Practice · BookRepentancePart 2 · Ch. 1

One Remorse, Two Roads

2.1 One Remorse, Two Roads

When a person has done wrong, an ache rises in the heart. This ache — should it be kept, or should it be released?

People today answer this in great confusion. On one side, some say: you must be able to own a mistake, be able to reproach yourself — nothing is more frightening than a person who cannot reflect. On the other side, some say: stop forever holding things against yourself; chewing over old errors only drags a person down — learn to let yourself off the hook. So the same ache carries two faces on its back: it looks at once like the mark of maturity and like the symptom of illness.

The Buddha saw this ache more finely than we do. He did not blur it — He set both faces, plainly and openly, on one and the same word: remorse.

Look First at the Good Face

Teaching His own son Rāhula, the Buddha once laid out how remorse should walk.

It was at the Bamboo Grove of Kalandaka, by Rājagṛha. Rāhula was staying then in the Hot Springs Grove outside the city. The Buddha came to see him, and did not open with grand principles; He asked for a basin of water, and before the boy's eyes washed His feet and poured the water out, borrowing that basin — full, emptied, overturned, clean — to teach him one thing at a time. When it came to what one should do after an evil deed had arisen in body, speech, or mind, His words were clear:

Having done such a deed of body, disclose it wholeheartedly; you should confess the fault and on no account conceal it, and guard yourself the better hereafter.

See that you have done an impure deed, go to a good friend, a fellow practitioner, and wholeheartedly disclose it, speak it out, on no account conceal it, and guard yourself well hereafter. This is the first step: say it out. But when it came to the deed of mind, He added one more line:

Rāhula! Let go of that past deed of mind.

What is already past, already disclosed, is to be set down, not seized back again. This is the second step: let it go.

Look at these two steps. One step is "saying it out" — disclosing the fault, not concealing it. One step is "letting it go" — what has been spoken is not clutched and replayed. One handing-over, one releasing: only this is the complete course the Buddha sanctions, the road remorse ought to walk to its end. And the problem hides in just these two steps: what happens if either one is missing? Not spoken, but tucked instead into the heart, remorse ferments in the dark. Spoken, yet not let go — the old matter seized back and replayed over and over — remorse becomes a replay with no endpoint. For this second kind, the remorse that turns without stopping, the Buddha gave another name, and listed it among the five hindrances that veil practice: restlessness-and-remorse. The restlessness is the mind's agitation; the remorse is that surge of regret. Agitation and remorse welded together, set spinning — and it becomes a hindrance.

The Good Edge Closes Itself Out

What does good remorse look like? The Āgamas have an utterly steady formula for it, three beats: see the fault, disclose it, guard against its recurrence — see that you have erred, say it out, hold the future and do not offend again. When the three beats are walked, the Buddha always adds one clause: such a person grows the noble Dharma and suffers no loss.

Most moving of all: this good edge closes itself out.

In Jeta's Grove, Anāthapiṇḍada's Park, at Śrāvastī, two young monks once fell into a quarrel. One was named Bhaṇḍa, a disciple of Ānanda; the other Abhiñjika, a disciple of Maudgalyāyana. What they quarreled over was nothing else than who knew more, who was the cleverer — they had turned the Buddha's teaching into capital for a contest. The venerable Mahākāśyapa could not look on, and reported it to the Buddha. The Buddha summoned the two and laid them bare: I teach you these things so that you may tame yourselves, still yourselves, and tend toward nirvāṇa — and you two foolish men take them to contend over who has more, who wins? The two woke on the spot, came forward, bowed, and repented in a stream of words:

Repentance, World-Honored One! Repentance, Well-Gone One! We were foolish, we were unwholesome, and could not reason, and we fell to disputing.

The Buddha received their remorse:

I now receive you, out of compassion, that your wholesome states may grow and never decline.

And then this story has a clean and definite tail:

The two monks, hearing what the Buddha said, rejoiced and were gladdened, bowed, and departed.

Those words matter. Remorse here has a point of closure: the fault seen, the fault spoken, the remorse received by the Buddha — and the ache comes undone; the two bow and take their leave in gladness, and do not tuck it back in to carry home. This is precisely the mark of good remorse: once spoken, once received, it concludes — it does not keep turning.

This closing can be seen even at the moment remorse first stirs.

There was also a venerable of the Kāśyapa clan. Once, in a grove at Paṅkadhā, the Buddha was teaching the monks the precepts and praising the keeping of them; this venerable, listening at the side, felt a moment of resistance, and thought to himself: this ascetic makes rather too much of the rules. Later the Buddha wandered on to Śrāvastī. Not long after the Buddha had gone, remorse rose in Kāśyapa's heart; early the next morning he gathered robe and bowl, followed all the way to Śrāvastī, bowed before the Buddha, and disclosed it:

Today I myself know the fault and feel remorse, I myself see the fault and feel remorse; may the World-Honored One receive my repentance, out of compassion!

And the Buddha received it, saying:

One who feels remorse thus — his wholesome states grow and never decline.

The remorse that rose in Kāśyapa's heart in that very instant is the same surge of feeling as the restlessness-and-remorse that hardens into a hindrance, treated above. But the moment it stirred, it pushed him to disclose, to ask that his repentance be received; it found its exit, and so it became a gate.

The Bad Edge, Idling

Now strip the exit away, and look at the other road of the same remorse.

The Buddha lodges bad remorse within the five hindrances. And here is a detail easily missed: the Āgamas do not grant "remorse" a hindrance-slot of its own; they bind "restlessness" (the agitation) and "remorse" (the regret) into a single hindrance. The sūtras themselves take it apart plainly:

There is agitation, there is remorse; that agitation, that remorse, is just the hindrance — not knowledge, not full awakening, not turning toward Nibbāna.

What forms the hindrance is not remorse in isolation but remorse bound to agitation, welded to the mind's restlessness and turning round and round. In other words, remorse is not by nature a hindrance; only when it joins the mind's agitation and begins to spin does it become one.

How, then, does it tip from good to bad? The Buddha is very concrete: a hindrance has its food and its anti-food — there is what nourishes it, and what starves it out. What feeds restlessness-and-remorse is repeated recollection — kin, company, pleasures once enjoyed, turned over and over oneself, or prompted by another, and turned over in a way that is not wise. What starves it is the stilling of the mind:

What is the anti-food of the hindrance of restlessness-and-remorse? Attention that stills: the unarisen hindrance does not arise, and the arisen hindrance is made to cease.

Put plainly: once regret becomes a compulsive replay of old matters, it is fed mouthful by mouthful; the moment the mind comes to rest, it is starved out. Good remorse concludes itself through saying-out and letting-go; bad remorse keeps itself alive through thinking-without-stop — the watershed lies exactly here.

On this idling remorse the Āgamas have their plainest line: a person who constantly produces an agitated, remorseful mind cannot, for that very reason, see the marks of things clearly; restlessness-and-remorse becomes a cause of scatter, leaving the person unable to find the way out. A surge of remorse that could have been the occasion for seeing a fault, once it loses its exit and starts to spin, turns the other way — into an obstruction that keeps a person from seeing clearly and from walking out.

And it has one flavor it cannot escape: suffering. Good remorse runs to its end in "rejoiced, bowed, and departed"; bad remorse winds down, at the last, to "the mind gives rise to anguish." The same feeling — one closing in gladness, one trapped in suffering — and the difference is only this: whether it can walk out, or cannot.

For this remorse that turns without stopping, the medicine the Buddha prescribes is not more thinking, more analysis — that would be adding fuel to the fire — but letting the mind first grow still. A mind churned by restlessness-and-remorse looks like a bowl of water stirred by the wind: once the surface is troubled, it will not show even a face. The more anxiously you try to make out, in that murky water, exactly where you went wrong, the murkier the water gets. To see the reflection, you must first let the water grow still.

One Thing to See Clearly Here

So, facing that ache in your own heart, the question to ask is not "am I remorseful enough," but "does this remorse have an exit."

To see the fault, speak it, guard the future, and then set it down — this road is itself growth, not disgrace. The other way — replaying the old error in the heart again and again, refusing to hand it over, refusing to set it down — turns that same remorse from a helper into an obstruction.

The worth of remorse lies not in how thick it is, but in where it goes. With an exit, it is a gate; without one, it is a cell.

Walking On

This blade we have now seen clearly — on ordinary faults.

But what if it is driven to its end? If that remorse falls on the heaviest karma — on a man who killed his own father — how much force is left in the blade? Can it pull such a person, whole, out of the deepest pit?

In the next chapter we go to look at that limit — a king who killed his father and, before the Buddha, made the most complete of remorses.