瑜伽師地論 義疏通講 · 冊8

有心無心二地 · 合說 · 1 單元 · 第 817 冊 · 冊目次

有心無心二地 · 合說The Basic Section · The Two Stages, With Mind and Without Mind

全文五層 →Full five layers →
義疏Exposition

唯識視角。第八「有心地」與第九「無心地」,論不分開講,而是「合說」——因為要分清「有心/無心」,得先問一句:你說的「無心」,是哪一種無?論一連給了五把尺(五門),把「無心」的五種意思一層層量清楚,最後一把尺,正量出了阿賴耶識這個「心的底」。難處都用論裡本有的話講,不憑空添。地08(有心)是合說的家,地09(無心)即此中無心一面。

一、先問一句:為什麼「有心無心」要用五門,不一句話帶過?

因為「無心」這個詞,太容易含糊。一個睡著的人、一個昏倒的人、一個入了無想定的修行者、一個證了無餘涅槃的阿羅漢——都可以說「無心」,可這四個「無心」根本不是一回事。論深知這層歧義,所以不給一句空泛的定義,而是擺出五把尺:「謂此二地,俱由五門應知其相」——地施設、心亂不亂、生不生、分位、第一義。同一個人、同一個狀態,用不同的尺去量,「有心」還是「無心」的答案會不一樣。讀這一地,就是學會用這五把尺,把「無心」量精確。

二、五把量「無心」的尺

第一把·地施設門(按它在哪一地):五識身相應地、意地、有尋有伺、無尋唯伺,這四地一向是有心地;無尋無伺地裡,單把「無想定、無想生、滅盡定」挑出來算無心地,其餘仍是有心。這是最素樸的一把尺——按定境的歸屬劃。

第二把·心亂不亂門(按顛倒與否):這把尺最特別。被四顛倒(常樂我淨的顛倒)顛倒了的心,叫「亂心」;而論說「亂心,亦名無心,性失壞故」——顛倒亂心也算「無心」,因為它已失了心的本性。論還引了世間的說法:「如世間見心狂亂者,便言此人是無心人」。這把尺量的不是「心停了沒」,而是「心壞了沒」——一個顛倒迷亂的心,雖在動,卻已不是『正常的心』,故亦名無心。這提醒我們:「無心」有一層是「失心、壞心」的意思,不只是「心不起」。

第三把·生不生門(按心生得起生不起):心要生起,得眾緣具足;論列出八種讓心生不起來的因緣——根破壞、境不現前、闕作意、(定)未得、相違、(種子)已斷、(前念)已滅、(此念)已生。八緣裡只要落到「不生」這邊,當下就是無心地;八緣相違、心得生,就是有心地。這把尺接著意地所立的道理——根不壞、境現前、作意正起,識才生得起來——一路下來,把「有心」還原成「眾緣令心現起」的剎那事。

第四把·分位門(按所處的位次):除六個位次外都是有心地。哪六位無心?無心睡眠位、無心悶絕位、無想定位、無想生位、滅盡定位、無餘依涅槃界位。睡到無夢、昏到不省、入無想定、生無想天、入滅盡定、證無餘涅槃——這六種狀態裡,(前六識的)心不現行,故名無心。這是最常被引用的一把尺。

三、全篇的眼目:第一義門——真無心唯涅槃,阿賴耶識是心的底

前四把尺都還在「現象」層面量。第五把·第一義門,把尺立到了究竟處,也立出了整段最深的唯識義:論說「唯無餘依涅槃界中,是無心地」。為什麼唯獨它?因為「於此界中,阿賴耶識亦永滅故」。至於其餘那些「無心」狀態——無想定、滅盡定、睡眠、悶絕——論一句點破:「所餘諸位,轉識滅故,名無心地。阿賴耶識未永滅盡,於第一義非無心地」。

這一句,是整個唯識學最關鍵的支柱之一。它說:那六位「無心」,其實只是「轉識」(前七識)停了——並不是真的什麼識都沒有;阿賴耶識依舊在,並沒有永滅。所以從第一義(究竟真實)看,它們並不是真正的無心;真正、徹底的無心,只有一處——無餘依涅槃,因為唯有那裡,連阿賴耶識也永滅了。

換句話說,論在這裡反過來證明了阿賴耶識的存在:人入了滅盡定、無想定,前六識明明都斷了,可他並沒有死、出定後生命與記憶照樣相續——靠的是什麼?正是那個沒斷的阿賴耶識。「無心」幾乎從來不是『沒有阿賴耶』,只是『沒有轉識』;阿賴耶識,是貫穿一切「無心」狀態、撐住生命相續的那個底。有心無心二地用這最後一把尺,悄悄把阿賴耶識請了出來——這正是它寫在唯識論藏裡的分量。

四、這一地的用意

有心無心二地,是十七地裡專講「心之有無」的一道關。它的本事不在多,而在「精確」——用五把尺,把含糊的「無心」量成五種清清楚楚的意思:按地、按顛倒、按生不生、按分位、按第一義。而五把尺量到最後,量出的是同一個結論:除了無餘涅槃,所謂「無心」都只是轉識暫停、阿賴耶識仍在。識可以斷六、斷七,卻有一個底斷不掉,直到究竟涅槃。認清這個底,才算真懂了「有心」與「無心」。

承衍

第一義門·真無心唯無餘依(阿賴耶亦永滅)·餘位轉識滅而阿賴耶未滅 → 阿賴耶識存在之教證(承意地一切種子識 02-03·啟成唯識論阿賴耶五教十理·滅盡定有識證);生不生門·八因緣 → 意地/三相統攝「根境作意·識方生」02-05;分位六無心位(無想定·滅盡定…)→〈三摩呬多地 06〉二無心定·〈聲聞地 13〉滅盡定修證;心亂不亂·四顛倒 → 〈不如理作意 03-04〉顛倒·〈聲聞地〉四念住治顛倒。

A Consciousness-Only reading. The eighth stage, "with mind," and the ninth, "without mind," the treatise does not expound apart, but "together" — for to draw the line clearly between "with mind" and "without mind," one must first ask a single question: this "without mind" you speak of, which kind of "without" is it? In one stroke the treatise offers five measuring-rods (five gates), and measures the five senses of "without mind" clear, layer by layer; and the last rod measures out precisely the store consciousness, that "bottom of the mind." The hard points are all spoken in words the treatise itself already has; nothing is added out of the air. Stage 08 (with mind) is the home of the joint discussion; Stage 09 (without mind) is just the "without mind" face of it.

One · First, a Single Question: Why Should "With Mind, Without Mind" Take Five Gates, Rather Than Be Settled in a Sentence?

Because the word "without mind" is far too easy to blur. A sleeping person, a person in a faint, a practitioner who has entered the attainment of no-perception, an arhat who has realized nirvāṇa without remaining basis — every one of them may be said to be "without mind," yet these four "without minds" are not one and the same thing at all. The treatise knows this ambiguity through and through, and so it gives no vague single definition, but sets out five measuring-rods: "these two stages are both to be known in their characteristics through five gates" — the setting-forth of the stages, whether the mind is disordered or not, whether [mind] arises or not, phase, and the ultimate truth. One and the same person, one and the same state, measured by a different rod, yields a different answer to "with mind" or "without mind." To read this stage is to learn to take these five rods and measure "without mind" precisely.

Two · The Five Rods That Measure "Without Mind"

The first rod · the gate of the setting-forth of the stages (by which stage a state belongs to): the Stage Associated with the Five Sense-Consciousnesses, the Stage of the Mental, the Stage with Both Applied and Sustained Thought, and the Stage with Sustained Thought Only — these four are, without exception, stages with mind. Within the Stage with Neither Applied nor Sustained Thought, only "the attainment of no-perception, birth in no-perception, and the attainment of cessation" are singled out and counted as stages without mind; the rest remains with mind. This is the plainest of the rods — dividing by the belonging of the meditative states.

The second rod · the gate of disordered-or-not (by inversion or not): this rod is the most peculiar of all. A mind that the four inversions (the inversion of permanence-pleasure-self-purity) have inverted is called a "disordered mind"; and the treatise says, "the disordered mind is also named 'no mind,' because its very nature has been lost and ruined" — an inverted, disordered mind counts as "without mind" too, because it has lost the original nature of mind. The treatise even cites the world's own saying: "it is as when the world, seeing a person whose mind is deranged, straightaway says, 'This person is a mindless person.'" What this rod measures is not "has the mind stopped?" but "has the mind been ruined?" — an inverted, deluded mind, though it is stirring, is already no longer a "mind in its right state," and so it too is named "without mind." This alerts us: "without mind" carries one layer that means "a lost mind, a ruined mind," not only "the mind does not arise."

The third rod · the gate of arising-or-not (by whether the mind can arise or cannot): for the mind to arise, the many conditions must be complete; the treatise lists eight causes and conditions that keep the mind from arising — the faculty is impaired, the object is not present, attention is lacking, [the attainment] has not been gained, [something] is contrary, [the seed] has been cut off, [the prior thought] has ceased, and [this thought] has already arisen. If any one of the eight falls to the "not-arising" side, that is at once the stage without mind; when the eight are contrary and the mind does arise, that is the stage with mind. This rod carries on the principle laid down in the Stage of the Mental — the faculty unimpaired, the object present, attention properly arisen, and only then does consciousness arise — following it right through, restoring "with mind" to the momentary matter of "the many conditions making the mind appear."

The fourth rod · the gate of phase (by the phase or position one is in): apart from six phases, all the rest is with mind. Which six are without mind? The phase of mindless sleep, the phase of mindless swoon, the phase of the attainment of no-perception, the phase of birth in no-perception, the phase of the attainment of cessation, and the phase of the sphere of nirvāṇa without remaining basis. Sleeping without a dream, fainting past all awareness, entering the attainment of no-perception, being born in the heaven of no-perception, entering the attainment of cessation, realizing nirvāṇa without remaining basis — in these six states the mind (of the first six consciousnesses) does not operate, and so [each] is named without mind. This is the most often cited of the rods.

Three · The Point of the Eye for the Whole Piece: The Gate of the Ultimate Truth — True "Without Mind" Is Nirvāṇa Alone, and the Store Consciousness Is the Bottom of the Mind

The first four rods still measure at the level of "phenomena." The fifth rod · the gate of the ultimate truth sets the rod at the ultimate place, and there sets forth the deepest Consciousness-Only meaning of the whole passage: the treatise says, "only within the sphere of nirvāṇa without remaining basis is there the stage without mind." Why it alone? Because "within this sphere the store consciousness too is forever extinguished." As for all those other "without mind" states — the attainment of no-perception, the attainment of cessation, sleep, swoon — the treatise breaks it open in a single line: "as for all the remaining phases, they are named the stage without mind [only] because the turning consciousnesses have ceased; the store consciousness has not been forever and completely extinguished, and so, by the ultimate truth, they are not [truly] the stage without mind."

This one line is one of the most crucial pillars in all of Consciousness-Only learning. It says: those six phases of "without mind" are in fact only a case of the "turning consciousnesses" (the first seven consciousnesses) having stopped — it is not that there is truly no consciousness at all; the store consciousness is still there, and has not been forever extinguished. So, seen by the ultimate truth (ultimate reality), they are not truly without mind; the true and thorough "without mind" is at one place alone — nirvāṇa without remaining basis, because there alone the store consciousness too is forever extinguished.

Put another way, the treatise here proves, in reverse, the existence of the store consciousness: when a person enters the attainment of cessation or the attainment of no-perception, the first six consciousnesses have plainly all been cut off, yet he has not died, and on emerging from the attainment his life and memory continue on as before — on what does this rest? On precisely that store consciousness which was not cut off. "Without mind" is almost never "without a store consciousness," but only "without the turning consciousnesses"; the store consciousness is the bottom that runs through every "without mind" state and holds up the continuity of life. The Two Stages, With Mind and Without Mind, use this last rod to bring the store consciousness quietly out onto the stage — and this is exactly the weight the passage carries within the Consciousness-Only treasury of treatises.

Four · The Purport of This Stage

The Two Stages, With Mind and Without Mind, are, among the seventeen stages, the one pass that deals expressly with "the presence or absence of mind." Their skill lies not in bulk but in "precision" — using five rods to measure a blurry "without mind" into five clear, distinct senses: by stage, by inversion, by arising-or-not, by phase, by the ultimate truth. And measured to the end, the five rods measure out one and the same conclusion: apart from nirvāṇa without remaining basis, all so-called "without mind" is only the turning consciousnesses momentarily halted, with the store consciousness still there. Consciousness may cut off the six, may cut off the seven, yet there is one bottom that cannot be cut off — until the ultimate nirvāṇa. Only by recognizing this bottom does one truly understand "with mind" and "without mind."

Carrying Forward

The gate of the ultimate truth · true "without mind" is nirvāṇa without remaining basis alone (where the store consciousness too is forever extinguished) · in the remaining phases the turning consciousnesses cease while the store consciousness does not → the scriptural-and-treatise proof for the existence of the store consciousness (carrying forward the all-seeds store consciousness of the Stage of the Mental, 02–03; opening the way to the Cheng Weishi Lun's proof of the store consciousness by five scriptures and ten reasons, and to the proof that there is consciousness in the attainment of cessation). The gate of arising-or-not · the eight causes and conditions → the establishment of the many conditions of the mind's arising (carrying forward the Stage of the Mental / the threefold subsuming of "faculty, object, attention · and only then does consciousness arise," 02–05). The six phases without mind of the gate of phase (the attainment of no-perception, the attainment of cessation, …) → the two mindless attainments of the Stage of Meditative Equipoise (06) and the cultivation-and-realization of the attainment of cessation in the Śrāvaka Stage (13). The four inversions of the gate of disordered-or-not → the inversion of the Stage of the Mental's "unwise attention" (03–04) and the four foundations of mindfulness that heal inversion in the Śrāvaka Stage.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing — with AI-assisted consistency checking

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0