11
Part 1 · The Measure
Four Śrāmaṇa Fruitions · 2 papers
This book walks the four stations of the śrāvaka path: sotāpanna, sakadāgāmin, anāgāmin, arahant—the stream-enterer, the once-returner, the non-returner, and the one in whom the de[ from the book's part intro ]
論Study the papersfootnotes · abstracts
01Measuring Fruit by SubtractionHow is progress on the path to be measured? A widespread intuition answers: by attainment felt — by the depth of absorption, the brightness of experience, the altitude of the states one reaches. This paper argues that the intuition runs exactly counter to how the canon itself defines the fruits. When the Buddha in the Saṃyukta-āgama and Vasubandhu in the Abhidharmakośa define the four śrāmaṇya-phalas head-on, the sole ruler they use is which fetters (saṃyojana) have been severed: the stream-enterer severs three fetters; the once-returner severs three and attenuates greed, hatred, and delusion; the non-returner exhausts the five lower fetters; the arahant exhausts every defilement. No state-attainment appears as a definitional term. Two further claims are pressed. First, in the Susīma episode the "wisdom-liberated" (paññāvimutta) arahants explicitly lack jhāna and the formless attainments, yet the Buddha ratifies their declaration of exhausted taints — direct scriptural proof that fruit does not hang on experience. Second, the Kośa identifies the very substance of a fruit as pratisaṃkhyā-nirodha, cessation-through-discrimination; so to measure by fetters-severed is to measure the fruit's own body, not to impose a foreign yardstick. The conclusion: the four fruits form a measurable subtraction — they count what is gone, not what is gained — and this division of the axis walks that subtraction fruit by fruit.02The Hinge of Approach and FruitThe preceding paper established that the four śrāmaṇya-phalas are measured by severance — a subtraction. This paper asks after that subtraction's inner grammar: why are the four fruits not four isolated marks, but unfold as the four pairs and eight persons (cattāri purisayugāni, aṭṭha purisapuggalā) — four approaches, four fruits, eight kinds of noble one? The thesis: approach and fruit are two phases of one and the same severing. The approach is the dynamic cutting — the wall coming down; the fruit is the static establishment — the wall standing down. Hinged one before the other, they form the minimal unit of the subtraction. Scripturally, the Saṃyukta- and Madhyama-āgamas list the eight as paired approach/fruit in so many words. The fine mechanics of the turn — "upon the sixteenth mind, the knowledge-of-the-type-of-the-path, one is called 'abiding in the fruit,' no longer 'approaching'" — is by contrast chiefly elaborated in the Abhidharmakośa; this paper marks that difference of register honestly. It further argues that the Kośa's "the names are eight but the substances five" discloses the hinge's deep sense: the latter three fruits' approaches are not separate from the prior fruit, so eight names reduce to five substances — proof that approach and fruit are not two things joined, but the moving and resting faces of a single severance. Conclusion: the eight persons are the joint of the subtraction, and the approach-fruit hinge is the grammar of the fruit-by-fruit walk to come.Same part, two ways in — papers keep the scholarly apparatus; the book is continuous prose for reading. Same source.