楞嚴經 卷第四・三種相續The Śūraṅgama Sūtra · Fascicle Four: The Three Kinds of Continuity

〔T19 0119c02〕
心要Essence

富樓那問:清淨本然,怎麼忽然生出山河大地?

佛問回去:覺,本來就明?還是要去明它?

「性覺必明,妄為明覺。」

世界、眾生、業果

一念要明,就立了所。所一立,能就生。

風輪、金輪、火光、水輪。父母子孫。殺、盜、婬。

「皆是覺明明了知性,因了發相,從妄見生。」

悟後會再迷嗎

迷方的人,被指點了,還會再迷嗎?

「不也。世尊!」

「如金鑛雜於精金,其金一純,更不成雜」。

地水火風怎麼相容

虛空不是任何相,卻不拒任何相。

「非心、非空,非地、非水、非風、非火」——一路非到涅槃四德。再一路即回來。

「離即、離非,是即、非即。」

演若達多

早晨照鏡子,愛鏡裡的頭,瞋自己的頭看不見,狂走。

「忽然狂歇,頭非外得。縱未歇狂,亦何遺失?」

「歇即菩提,勝淨明心本周法界,不從人得」。

因緣?自然?

阿難說:三緣斷、三因不生,這不是因緣嗎?

頭本自然,何因緣狂走?狂若本有,未狂時藏在哪裡?

「因緣、自然俱為戲論。」

兩個決定

因地心,要不生滅的。生滅心修因,求不生不滅——「無有是處」。

煩惱根本在哪裡?「六為賊媒,自劫家寶」。

眼八百,耳一千二百。揀圓通的根,「一門深入」。

擊鐘

鐘響,問:聞不?聞。聲歇,問:聞不?不聞。

「聲於聞中自有生滅;非為汝聞聲生、聲滅,令汝聞性為有、為無。」

睡著的人,夢裡把舂米聽成鐘。「其形雖寐,聞性不昏。」

Pūrṇa asks: pure and originally so—how do mountains, rivers, and the great earth suddenly arise?

The Buddha asks back: awakening—is it bright of itself? Or must you go and brighten it?

“The nature-awakening is necessarily bright; falsely it is taken as a bright awakening.”

The World, Living Beings, Action and Result

One thought that would brighten sets up an object. Once the object is set up, the subject is born.

The wind-wheel, the metal-wheel, the light of fire, the water-wheel. Fathers, mothers, children, grandchildren. Killing, stealing, lust.

“All the nature of awakened brightness that would clearly know; because of knowing, appearances are sent forth; they arise from false seeing.”

After Awakening, Will One Be Confused Again?

The man confused about direction, once shown the way—will he be confused again?

“No, World-Honored One!”

“As when gold ore is mixed with pure gold—once the gold is pure, it does not become mixed again.”

How Do Earth, Water, Fire, and Wind Admit One Another?

Empty space is not any appearance, yet refuses none.

“Is not mind, is not space, is not earth, is not water, is not wind, is not fire”—all the way down to the four virtues of nirvāṇa, ‘is not.’ Then all the way back, ‘is.’

“Apart from ‘is,’ apart from ‘is not’; it is ‘is,’ and it is not ‘is.’”

Yajñadatta

One morning he looks into a mirror, loves the head in the mirror, is angry that his own head cannot be seen, and runs about madly.

“Suddenly the madness stops; the head was not got from outside. And even before the madness stopped, what was lost?”

“When it stops, that is bodhi: the supreme, pure, bright mind originally pervades the dharma-realm and is not got from anyone else.”

Causes and Conditions? Spontaneity?

Ānanda says: the three conditions cut off, the three causes not arising—is this not causes and conditions?

If the head is spontaneous, by what causes and conditions did he run mad? If the madness was originally there, where was it hidden before he went mad?

“Causes and conditions and spontaneity are both idle disputation.”

Two Decisions

The mind at the stage of cause must be one that neither arises nor perishes. To cultivate from an arising-and-perishing mind and seek what neither arises nor perishes—“there is no such thing.”

Where is the root of the afflictions? “The six are the thieves’ go-betweens, robbing your own house of its treasure.”

The eye, eight hundred; the ear, twelve hundred. Choose the perfectly penetrating faculty, and “enter deeply by one gate.”

Striking the Bell

The bell sounds. Do you hear? We hear. The sound dies away. Do you hear? We do not hear.

“Sound within hearing has its own arising and perishing; it is not that your hearing of sound’s arising and sound’s perishing makes your nature of hearing present or absent.”

The man asleep hears the husking of rice in his dream and takes it for a bell. “Though his body slept, his nature of hearing was not dimmed.”

原典Canonical · verbatim

大唐神龍元年龍集乙巳五月己卯朔二十三日辛丑中天竺沙門般剌蜜帝於廣州制止道場譯出·菩薩戒弟子前正諫大夫同中書門下平章事清河房融筆授·烏長國沙門彌伽釋迦譯語《大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經》〈卷第四・三種相續〉· 大正藏 T19n0945〔起 T19 0119c02〕。段/行首〔T19 …〕=大正藏頁・欄・行錨。

〔T19 0119c02〕大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經卷第四〔一名中印度那蘭陀大道場經,於灌頂部錄出別行〕 唐天竺沙門般剌蜜帝譯 爾時,富樓那彌多羅尼子在大眾中即從座起,偏袒右肩,右膝著地,合掌恭敬而白佛言:「大威德世尊!善為眾生敷演如來第一義諦。世尊常推說法人中我為第一,今聞如來微妙法音,猶如聾人逾百步外聆於蚊蚋,本所不見,何況得聞?佛雖宣明令我除惑,今猶未詳斯義究竟無疑惑地。世尊!如阿難輩,雖則開悟,習漏未除;我等會中登無漏者,雖盡諸漏,今聞如來所說法音,尚紆疑悔。世尊!若復世間一切根、塵、陰、處、界等皆如來藏清淨本然,云何忽生山河大地諸有為相,次第遷流,終而復始?又如來說地、水、火、風本性圓融、周遍法界,湛然常住,世尊!若地性遍,云何容水?水性周遍,火則不生。復云何明水、火二性俱遍虛空不相𣣋滅?世尊!地性障礙,空性虛通,云何二俱周遍法界?而我不知是義攸往,唯願如來宣流大慈,開我迷雲,及諸大眾!」作是語已,五體投地,欽渴如來無上慈誨。 爾時,世尊告富樓那及諸會中漏盡無學諸阿羅漢:「如來今日普為此會宣勝義中真勝義性,令汝會中定性聲聞,及諸一切未得二空迴向上乘阿羅漢等,皆獲一乘寂滅場地、真阿練若正修行處。汝今諦聽!當為汝說。」富樓那等欽佛法音,默然承聽。 〔T19 0120a02〕佛言:「富樓那!如汝所言『清淨本然,云何忽生山河大地?』汝常不聞如來宣說性覺妙明本覺明妙?」 富樓那言:「唯然,世尊!我常聞佛宣說斯義。」 佛言:「汝稱覺明,為復性明稱名為覺?為覺不明稱為明覺?」 富樓那言:「若此不明名為覺者,則無所明。」 佛言:「若無所明,則無明覺。有所非覺,無所非明,無明又非覺湛明性。性覺必明,妄為明覺。覺非所明,因明立所,所既妄立,生汝妄能,無同異中熾然成異。異彼所異,因異立同,同異發明,因此復立無同無異。如是擾亂相待生勞,勞久發塵自相渾濁,由是引起塵勞煩惱。起為世界,靜成虛空,虛空為同,世界為異。彼無同異真有為法,覺明、空昧相待成搖,故有風輪執持世界。因空生搖,堅明立礙,彼金寶者明覺立堅,故有金輪保持國土。堅覺寶成,搖明風出,風、金相摩故有火光為變化性;寶明生潤,火光上蒸,故有水輪含十方界。火騰、水降,交發立堅,濕為巨海,乾為洲潬。以是義故,彼大海中火光常起;彼洲潬中江河常注。水勢劣火,結為高山;是故山石擊則成炎,融則成水。土勢劣水,抽為草木;是故林藪遇燒成土,因絞成水,交妄發生,遞相為種;以是因緣世界相續。 「復次,富樓那,明妄非他,覺明為咎!所妄既立,明理不踰。以是因緣,聽不出聲,見不超色;色、香、味、觸六妄成就,由是分開見、覺、聞、知。同業相纏,合離成化,見明色發,明見想成。異見成憎,同想成愛,流愛為種,納想為胎。交遘發生,吸引同業,故有因緣生羯囉藍、遏蒱曇等。胎、卵、濕、化,隨其所應。卵唯想生,胎因情有,濕以合感,化以離應。情、想、合、離更相變易,所有受業逐其飛沈,以是因緣眾生相續。 「富樓那!想愛同結,愛不能離;則諸世間父母子孫相生不斷;是等則以欲貪為本。貪愛同滋,貪不能止,則諸世間卵、化、濕、胎,隨力強弱遞相吞食;是等則以殺貪為本。以人食羊,羊死為人,人死為羊,如是乃至十生之類,死死生生互來相噉,惡業俱生窮未來際;是等則以盜貪為本。汝負我命,我還汝債,以是因緣,經百千劫常在生死。汝愛我心,我憐汝色,以是因緣,經百千劫常在纏縛。唯殺、盜、婬三為根本,以是因緣業果相續。富樓那!如是三種顛倒相續,皆是覺明明了知性,因了發相,從妄見生。山河大地諸有為相,次第遷流;因此虛妄,終而復始。」 富樓那言:「若此妙覺本妙覺明與如來心不增不減,無狀忽生山河大地諸有為相;如來今得妙空明覺,山河大地有為習漏何當復生?」 佛告富樓那:「譬如迷人,於一聚落惑南為北,此迷為復因迷而有?因悟所出?」 富樓那言:「如是迷人,亦不因迷又不因悟。何以故?迷本無根,云何因迷?悟非生迷,云何因悟?」 佛言:「彼之迷人正在迷時,倐有悟人指示令悟;富樓那!於意云何?此人縱迷,於此聚落更生迷不?」 「不也。世尊!」 「富樓那!十方如來,亦復如是。此迷無本,性畢竟空。昔本無迷,似有迷覺,覺迷迷滅,覺不生迷。亦如瞖人見空中花,瞖病若除,花於空滅。忽有愚人,於彼空花所滅空地,待花更生;汝觀是人為愚為慧?」 富樓那言:「空元無花,妄見生滅,見花滅空已是顛倒,勅令更出斯實狂癡;云何更名如是狂人為愚為慧?」 佛言:「如汝所解,云何問言:『諸佛如來妙覺明空,何當更出山河大地?』又如金鑛雜於精金,其金一純,更不成雜;如木成灰,不重為木;諸佛如來菩提涅槃,亦復如是。 「富樓那!又汝問言:『地、水、火、風本性圓融周遍法界,疑水、火性不相𣣋滅?又徵虛空及諸大地俱遍法界,不合相容。』富樓那!譬如虛空體非群相,而不拒彼諸相發揮。所以者何?富樓那!彼太虛空,日照則明,雲屯則暗,風搖則動,霽澄則清,氣凝則濁,土積成霾,水澄成映。於意云何?如是殊方諸有為相,為因彼生?為復空有?若彼所生,富樓那!且日照時既是日明,十方世界同為日色,云何空中更見圓日?若是空明,空應自照,云何中宵雲霧之時,不生光耀?當知是明,非日、非空,不異空、日。觀相元妄,無可指陳,猶邀空花結為空菓,云何詰其相𣣋滅義?觀性元真,唯妙覺明,妙覺明心先非水、火;云何復問不相容者!真妙覺明,亦復如是。汝以空明則有空現,地、水、火、風各各發明,則各各現;若俱發明,則有俱現。云何俱現?富樓那!如一水中現於日影,兩人同觀水中之日,東西各行,則各有日隨二人去;一東一西,先無准的。不應難言:『此日是一,云何各行?各日既雙,云何現一?』宛轉虛妄,無可憑據。 「富樓那!汝以色空相傾相奪於如來藏,而如來藏隨為色空,周遍法界,是故於中風動、空澄、日明、雲暗。眾生迷悶背覺合塵,故發塵勞有世間相。我以妙明不滅不生合如來藏,而如來藏唯妙覺明,圓照法界,是故於中一為無量、無量為一,小中現大、大中現小,不動道場遍十方界,身含十方無盡虛空,於一毛端現寶王剎,坐微塵裏轉大法輪。滅塵合覺,故發真如妙覺明性。而如來藏本妙圓心,非心、非空,非地、非水、非風、非火;非眼、非耳、鼻、舌、身、意,非色、非聲、香、味、觸、法;非眼識界、如是乃至非意識界;非明、無明、明、無明盡,如是乃至非老、非死、非老死盡;非苦、非集、非滅、非道;非智、非得;非檀那、非尸羅、非毘梨耶、非羼提、非禪那、非鉢剌若、非波羅蜜多;如是乃至非怛闥阿竭,非阿羅訶、三耶三菩;非大涅槃,非常、非樂、非我、非淨,以是俱非世出世故。即如來藏元明心妙,即心、即空、即地、即水、即風、即火;即眼、即耳、鼻、舌、身、意、即色、即聲、香、味、觸、法;即眼識界、如是乃至即意識界;即明、無明、明、無明盡,如是乃至即老、即死、即老死盡;即苦、即集、即滅、即道;即智、即得;即檀那、即尸羅、即毘梨耶、即羼提、即禪那、即鉢剌若、即波羅蜜多;如是乃至即怛闥阿竭,即阿羅訶、三耶三菩;即大涅槃,即常、即樂、即我、即淨,以是即俱世出世故。即如來藏妙明心元,離即、離非,是即、非即。如何世間三有眾生,及出世間聲聞、緣覺,以所知心測度如來無上菩提!用世語言入佛知見!譬如琴、瑟、箜篌、琵琶,雖有妙音,若無妙指終不能發。汝與眾生亦復如是。寶覺真心各各圓滿,如我按指,海印發光;汝暫舉心,塵勞先起,由不勤求無上覺道,愛念小乘,得少為足。」 〔T19 0121b04〕富樓那言:「我與如來寶覺圓明真妙淨心無二圓滿;而我昔遭無始妄想久在輪迴,今得聖乘猶未究竟;世尊諸妄一切圓滅,獨妙真常。敢問如來,一切眾生何因有妄,自蔽妙明,受此淪溺?」 佛告富樓那:「汝雖除疑,餘惑未盡。吾以世間現前諸事,今復問汝,汝豈不聞室羅城中演若達多,忽於晨朝以鏡照面,愛鏡中頭眉目可見,瞋責己頭不見面目,以為魑魅,無狀狂走。於意云何?此人何因無故狂走?」 富樓那言:「是人心狂,更無他故。」 佛言:「妙覺明圓、本圓明妙,既稱為妄,云何有因?若有所因,云何名妄?自諸妄想展轉相因,從迷積迷以歷塵劫;雖佛發明,猶不能返。如是迷因,因迷自有。識迷無因,妄無所依;尚無有生,欲何為滅?得菩提者,如寤時人、說夢中事;心縱精明,欲何因緣取夢中物?況復無因本無所有。如彼城中演若達多,豈有因緣自怖頭走?忽然狂歇,頭非外得。縱未歇狂,亦何遺失?富樓那!妄性如是,因何為在?汝但不隨分別世間、業果、眾生、三種相續,三緣斷故,三因不生;則汝心中演若達多狂性自歇。歇即菩提,勝淨明心本周法界,不從人得;何藉劬勞肯綮修證? 「譬如有人,於自衣中、繫如意珠,不自覺知,窮露他方,乞食馳走;雖實貧窮,珠不曾失,忽有智者指示其珠,所願從心,致大饒富,方悟神珠非從外得。」 即時阿難在大眾中,頂禮佛足,起立白佛:「世尊現說殺、盜、婬業三緣斷故,三因不生;心中達多狂性自歇,歇即菩提,不從人得。斯則因緣皎然明白,云何如來頓棄因緣?我從因緣心得開悟。世尊!此義何獨我等年少有學聲聞,今此會中大目犍連,及舍利弗、須菩提等,從老梵志聞佛因緣,發心開悟得成無漏。今說菩提不從因緣,則王舍城拘舍梨等所說自然,成第一義!唯垂大悲開發迷悶!」 佛告阿難:「即如城中演若達多,狂性因緣,若得滅除,則不狂性自然而出。因緣、自然,理窮於是。阿難!演若達多頭本自然,本自其然,無然非自,何因緣故怖頭狂走?若自然頭因緣故狂,何不自然因緣故失?本頭不失,狂怖妄出,曾無變易,何藉因緣?本狂自然,本有狂怖,未狂之際狂何所潛?不狂自然,頭本無妄,何為狂走?若悟本頭,識知狂走,因緣、自然俱為戲論。是故我言『三緣斷故即菩提心』,菩提心生,生滅心滅。此但生滅,滅生俱盡,無功用道。若有自然,如是則明自然心生,生滅心滅,此亦生滅;無生滅者名為自然。猶如世間諸相雜和成一體者,名和合性;非和合者稱本然性。本然非然,和合非合,合、然俱離,離、合俱非,此句方名無戲論法。菩提涅槃尚在遙遠,非汝歷劫辛勤修證,雖復憶持十方如來十二部經清淨妙理如恒河沙,秖益戲論。汝雖談說因緣、自然決定明了,人間稱汝多聞第一,以此積劫多聞薰習,不能免離摩登伽難。何須待我佛頂神呪,摩登伽心婬火頓歇得阿那含;於我法中成精進林,愛河乾枯,令汝解脫。是故阿難!汝雖歷劫憶持如來祕密妙嚴,不如一日修無漏業,遠離世間憎、愛二苦。如摩登伽宿為婬女,由神呪力銷其愛欲,法中今名性比丘尼。與羅睺羅母耶輸陀羅同悟宿因,知歷世因貪愛為苦,一念薰修無漏善故,或得出纏,或蒙授記。如何自欺,尚留觀聽!」 〔T19 0122a10〕阿難及諸大眾,聞佛示誨,疑惑銷除,心悟實相;身意輕安得未曾有!重復悲淚,頂禮佛足,長跪合掌而白佛言:「無上大悲清淨寶王善開我心!能以如是種種因緣方便提獎,引諸沈冥出於苦海。世尊!我今雖承如是法音,知如來藏妙覺明心遍十方界,含育如來十方國土、清淨寶嚴妙覺王剎;如來復責多聞無功,不逮修習。我今猶如旅泊之人,忽蒙天王賜以華屋。雖獲大宅,要因門入,唯願如來不捨大悲,示我在會諸蒙暗者捐捨小乘,畢獲如來無餘涅槃本發心路!令有學者,從何攝伏疇昔攀緣,得陀羅尼,入佛知見?」作是語已,五體投地。在會一心,佇佛慈旨。 爾時,世尊哀愍會中緣覺、聲聞於菩提心未自在者,及為當來佛滅度後末法眾生發菩提心,開無上乘妙修行路。宣示阿難及諸大眾:「汝等決定發菩提心,於佛如來妙三摩提不生疲惓,應當先明發覺初心二決定義。 「云何初心二義決定? 「阿難!第一義者,汝等若欲捐捨聲聞,修菩薩乘,入佛知見,應當審觀因地發心,與果地覺為同、為異?阿難!若於因地,以生滅心為本修因,而求佛乘不生不滅,無有是處。以是義故,汝當照明諸器世間可作之法,皆從變滅。阿難!汝觀世間可作之法,誰為不壞?然終不聞爛壞虛空。何以故?空非可作,由是始終無壞滅故。則汝身中堅相為地,潤濕為水,煖觸為火,動搖為風。由此四纏,分汝湛圓妙覺明心為視、為聽、為覺、為察,從始入終,五疊渾濁。云何為濁?阿難!譬如清水清潔本然;即彼塵土灰沙之倫,本質留礙,二體法爾,性不相循。有世間人,取彼土塵投於淨水,土失留礙,水亡清潔,容貌汩然,名之為濁。汝濁五重,亦復如是。 「阿難!汝見虛空遍十方界,空見不分。有空無體,有見無覺,相織妄成;是第一重名為劫濁。汝身現摶四大為體,見、聞、覺、知壅令留礙,水、火、風、土旋令覺知,相織妄成;是第二重名為見濁。又汝心中憶識誦習,性發知見,容現六塵,離塵無相,離覺無性,相織妄成;是第三重名煩惱濁。又汝朝夕生滅不停,知見每欲留於世間,業運每常遷於國土,相織妄成;是第四重名眾生濁。汝等見聞元無異性,眾塵隔越,無狀異生,性中相知,用中相背,同異失準,相織妄成;是第五重名為命濁。 「阿難!汝今欲令見、聞、覺、知遠契如來常、樂、我、淨,應當先擇死生根本,依不生滅圓湛性成,以湛旋其虛妄滅生,伏還元覺,得元明覺無生滅性,為因地心;然後圓成果地修證。如澄濁水貯於淨器,靜深不動,沙土自沈,清水現前,名為初伏客塵煩惱。去泥純水,名為永斷根本無明。明相精純,一切變現不為煩惱,皆合涅槃清淨妙德。 「第二義者,汝等必欲發菩提心,於菩薩乘生大勇猛,決定棄捐諸有為相,應當審詳煩惱根本。此無始來發業潤生,誰作誰受?阿難!汝修菩提,若不審觀煩惱根本,則不能知虛妄根塵何處顛倒?處尚不知,云何降伏取如來位?阿難!汝觀世間解結之人,不見所結,云何知解?不聞虛空被汝隳裂。何以故?空無相形,無結、解故。則汝現前眼、耳、鼻、舌、及與身、心,六為賊媒,自劫家寶;由此無始眾生世界生纏縛故,於器世間不能超越。 「阿難!云何名為眾生世界?世為遷流,界為方位。汝今當知東、西、南、北、東南、西南、東北、西北、上、下為界,過去、未來、現在為世;方位有十,流數有三。一切眾生織妄相成,身中貿遷,世界相涉。而此界性設雖十方定位可明,世間秖目東、西、南、北;上、下無位,中無定方。四數必明,與世相涉;三四、四三,宛轉十二;流變三疊,一、十、百、千。總括始終,六根之中,各各功德有千二百。 「阿難!汝復於中克定優劣。如眼觀見,後暗、前明,前方全明,後方全暗,左、右傍觀三分之二,統論所作功德不全;三分言功,一分無德,當知眼唯八百功德。如耳周聽十方無遺,動若邇遙,靜無邊際,當知耳根圓滿一千二百功德。如鼻嗅聞通出入息,有出有入而闕中交,驗於鼻根三分闕一,當知鼻唯八百功德。如舌宣揚盡諸世間、出世間智,言有方分,理無窮盡,當知舌根圓滿一千二百功德。如身覺觸識於違順,合時能覺,離中不知,離一合雙,驗於身根三分闕一,當知身唯八百功德。如意默容十方三世一切世間出世間法,惟聖與凡無不苞容盡其涯際,當知意根圓滿一千二百功德。 〔T19 0123a05〕「阿難!汝今欲逆生死欲流,返窮流根至不生滅;當驗此等六受用根,誰合、誰離?誰深、誰淺?誰為圓通?誰不圓滿?若能於此悟圓通根,逆彼無始織妄業流,得循圓通;與不圓根日劫相倍。我今備顯六湛圓明本所功德,數量如是。隨汝詳擇其可入者,吾當發明令汝增進。十方如來於十八界一一修行,皆得圓滿無上菩提。於其中間,亦無優劣。但汝下劣,未能於中圓自在慧;故我宣揚,令汝但於一門深入,入一無妄,彼六知根一時清淨。」 阿難白佛言:「世尊!云何逆流深入一門,能令六根一時清淨?」 佛告阿難:「汝今已得須陀洹果,已滅三界眾生世間見所斷惑;然猶未知根中積生無始虛習,彼習要因修所斷得,何況此中生、住、異、滅分劑頭數?今汝且觀現前六根,為一、為六? 「阿難!若言一者,耳何不見?目何不聞?頭奚不履?足奚無語?若此六根決定成六,如我今會與汝宣揚微妙法門,汝之六根誰來領受?」 阿難言:「我用耳聞。」 佛言:「汝耳自聞,何關身、口?口來問義,身起欽承。是故應知,非一終六,非六終一。終不汝根元一、元六,阿難!當知是根非一、非六,由無始來顛倒淪替,故於圓湛一、六義生,汝須陀洹雖得六銷,猶未亡一。如太虛空參合群器,由器形異名之異空,除器觀空說空為一。彼太虛空,云何為汝成同、不同?何況更名是一、非一?則汝了知六受用根,亦復如是。由明、暗等二種相形,於妙圓中粘湛發見,見精映色,結色成根;根元目為清淨四大,因名眼體,如蒲萄朵,浮根四塵流逸奔色。由動、靜等二種相擊,於妙圓中粘湛發聽,聽精映聲,卷聲成根;根元目為清淨四大,因名耳體,如新卷葉,浮根四塵流逸奔聲。由通、塞等二種相發,於妙圓中粘湛發嗅,嗅精映香,納香成根;根元目為清淨四大,因名鼻體,如雙垂爪,浮根四塵流逸奔香。由恬、變等二種相參,於妙圓中粘湛發嘗,嘗精映味,絞味成根;根元目為清淨四大,因名舌體,如初偃月,浮根四塵流逸奔味。由離、合等二種相摩,於妙圓中粘湛發覺,覺精映觸,搏觸成根;根元目為清淨四大,因名身體,如腰鼓顙,浮根四塵流逸奔觸。由生、滅等二種相續,於妙圓中粘湛發知,知精映法,覽法成根;根元目為清淨四大,因名意思,如幽室見,浮根四塵流逸奔法。 「阿難!如是六根,由彼覺明有明明覺,失彼精了粘妄發光。是以汝今離暗、離明無有見體,離動、離靜元無聽質,無通、無塞嗅性不生,非變、非恬嘗無所出,不離、不合覺觸本無,無滅、無生了知安寄!汝但不循動靜、合離、恬變、通塞、生滅、暗明,如是十二諸有為相;隨拔一根,脫粘內伏,伏歸元真,發本明耀,耀性發明,諸餘五粘應拔圓脫,不由前塵所起知見。明不循根,寄根明發,由是六根互相為用。 「阿難!汝豈不知今此會中,阿那律陀無目而見;跋難陀龍無耳而聽;殑伽神女非鼻聞香;驕梵鉢提異舌知味;舜若多神無身有觸,如來光中映令暫現,既為風質,其體元無;諸滅盡定得寂聲聞,如此會中摩訶迦葉,久滅意根,圓明了知不因心念。阿難!今汝諸根若圓拔已,內瑩發光;如是浮塵及器世間諸變化相,如湯銷氷,應念化成無上知覺。阿難!如彼世人聚見於眼,若令急合,暗相現前。六根黯然,頭足相類。彼人以手循體外繞,彼雖不見,頭足一辯,知覺是同。緣見因明,暗成無見;不明自發,則諸暗相永不能昏。根塵既銷,云何覺明不成圓妙?」 阿難白佛言:「世尊!如佛說言『因地覺心欲求常住,要與果位名目相應』,世尊!如果位中,菩提、涅槃、真如、佛性、菴摩羅識、空如來藏、大圓鏡智,是七種名稱謂雖別,清淨圓滿體性堅凝,如金剛王常住不壞。若此見、聽離於暗明、動靜、通塞,畢竟無體;猶如念心離於前塵,本無所有。云何將此畢竟斷滅以為修因,欲獲如來七常住果?世尊!若離明暗,見畢竟空,如無前塵,念自性滅。進退循環,微細推求,本無我心及我心所,將誰立因求無上覺?如來先說湛精圓常,違越誠言,終成戲論;云何如來真實語者?唯垂大慈開我蒙悋!」 佛告阿難:「汝學多聞,未盡諸漏,心中徒知顛倒所因,真倒現前實未能識。恐汝誠心猶未信伏,吾今試將塵俗諸事,當除汝疑。」 即時如來勅羅睺羅擊鍾一聲,問阿難言:「汝今聞不?」 阿難、大眾俱言:「我聞。」 鍾歇無聲,佛又問言:「汝今聞不?」 〔T19 0124a01〕阿難、大眾俱言:「不聞。」 時羅睺羅又擊一聲,佛又問言:「汝今聞不?」 阿難、大眾又言:「俱聞。」 佛問阿難:「汝云何聞?云何不聞?」 阿難、大眾俱白佛言:「鍾聲若擊則我得聞;擊久聲銷,音響雙絕,則名無聞。」 如來又勅羅睺擊鍾,問阿難言:「爾今聲不?」 阿難、大眾俱言:「有聲。」 少選聲銷,佛又問言:「爾今聲不?」 阿難、大眾答言:「無聲。」 有頃,羅睺更來撞鍾,佛又問言:「爾今聲不?」 阿難、大眾俱言:「有聲。」 佛問阿難:「汝云何聲?云何無聲?」 阿難、大眾俱白佛言:「鍾聲若擊則名有聲;擊久聲銷,音響雙絕,則名無聲。」 佛語阿難及諸大眾:「汝今云何自語矯亂?」 大眾、阿難俱時問佛:「我今云何名為矯亂?」 佛言:「我問汝聞,汝則言聞;又問汝聲,汝則言聲。惟聞與聲報答無定,如是云何不名矯亂?阿難!聲銷無響,汝說無聞;若實無聞,聞性已滅同于枯木,鍾聲更擊,汝云何知?知有、知無,自是聲塵或無、或有,豈彼聞性為汝有、無?聞實云無,誰知無者?是故阿難!聲於聞中自有生滅;非為汝聞聲生、聲滅,令汝聞性為有、為無。汝尚顛倒,惑聲為聞,何怪昏迷,以常為斷?終不應言離諸動靜、閉塞、開通,說聞無性。如重睡人眠熟床枕,其家有人於彼睡時擣練、舂米,其人夢中聞舂擣聲別作他物,或為擊鼓,或復撞鍾;即於夢時,自怪其鍾為木石響。於時忽寤,遄知杵音。自告家人:『我正夢時,惑此舂音將為鼓響。』阿難!是人夢中,豈憶靜搖、開閉、通塞?其形雖寐,聞性不昏。縱汝形銷命光遷謝,此性云何為汝銷滅?以諸眾生從無始來,循諸色、聲逐念流轉,曾不開悟性淨妙常。不循所常,逐諸生滅,由是生生雜染流轉。若棄生滅,守於真常,常光現前,塵根、識心應時銷落。想相為塵,識情為垢,二俱遠離;則汝法眼應時清明,云何不成無上知覺?」 大佛頂萬行首楞嚴經卷第四

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

唐般剌蜜帝譯《楞嚴經》卷第四,自卷題至卷尾題;富樓那問清淨本然何以忽生山河大地、地水火風何以俱遍不相陵滅,如來答以性覺必明、妄為明覺,由是世界、眾生、業果三種相續,而如來藏隨為色空、離即離非;復以演若達多喻妄無因,斥因緣自然俱為戲論;阿難祈修,如來開二決定義——審因地發心、審煩惱根本,示六根功德優劣、根結之由,末以擊鍾驗聞性真常;段首(…)=大正藏頁·欄·行錨。

〔〇·卷題與譯署〕(0119c02)卷端題作「大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經卷第四〔一名中印度那蘭陀大道場經,於灌頂部錄出別行〕」〔T19 0119c02〕:經名是大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經,這是卷第四;題下夾注說,此經又名中印度那蘭陀大道場經,是從灌頂部中錄出、單獨流通的。譯署一行「唐天竺沙門般剌蜜帝譯」〔T19 0119c06〕——唐代天竺的沙門般剌蜜帝翻譯。大正藏本卷頭於卷題與譯署無校記。

〔1·致請·許宣〕(0119c07)這時,富樓那彌多羅尼子在大眾中即從座位起身,偏袒右肩,右膝著地,合掌恭敬,對佛說:『大威德世尊!您善於為眾生敷演如來的第一義諦。世尊常推許我在說法人中為第一,如今聽聞如來微妙的法音,就像聾人在百步之外去聽蚊蚋的聲音,本來連看都看不見,何況能聽得到?佛雖已宣說明白,要使我除去疑惑,如今我仍未能詳盡這義理,到達究竟無疑惑之地。世尊!像阿難這一輩,雖然已經開悟,習氣與有漏尚未除去;我們會中已登無漏的人,雖已盡除諸漏,如今聽聞如來所說的法音,心中還縈繞著疑悔。世尊!如果世間一切根、塵、陰、處、界等,都是如來藏清淨本然,為什麼忽然生出山河大地種種有為之相,次第遷流,終而復始?又如來說地、水、火、風本性圓融、周遍法界,湛然常住。世尊!如果地性周遍,怎麼容得下水?水性周遍,火就不能生起。又怎麼說明水、火二性都遍滿虛空,而不互相侵陵消滅?世尊!地性是障礙的,空性是虛通的,怎麼二者都周遍法界?我不知道這義理歸向何處,唯願如來宣流大慈,開啟我的迷雲,以及諸大眾的迷雲!』說完這話,五體投地,欽仰渴慕如來無上的慈誨。

〔1·致請·許宣〕(0119c25)這時,世尊告訴富樓那,以及會中諸位漏盡無學的阿羅漢:『如來今天普遍為這法會宣說勝義中的真勝義性,使你們會中的定性聲聞,以及一切尚未證得二空、迴向上乘的阿羅漢等,都獲得一乘寂滅的場地、真阿練若的正修行處。你們現在仔細聽!我當為你們解說。』富樓那等人欽仰佛的法音,默然承受聆聽。

〔2·答藏性生相疑〕(0120a02)佛說:『富樓那!如你所說:『清淨本然,為什麼忽然生出山河大地?』你不是常聽如來宣說性覺妙明、本覺明妙嗎?』富樓那說:『是的,世尊!我常聽佛宣說這義理。』佛說:『你所稱的覺明,是本性自明而稱名為覺?還是覺本來不明,要加上明才稱為明覺?』富樓那說:『如果這不明的叫作覺,那就無所明了。』佛說:『如果無所明,就沒有明覺。有所明就不是覺,無所明就不是明;無明又不是覺湛明之性。性覺必定本明,妄加以明,便成明覺。覺本不是所明,因為要明而立了所;所既然妄立,便生出你虛妄的能;在本無同異之中,熾然成了異。異於那所異的,因異而立同;同與異互相發明,又因此再立無同無異。這樣擾亂,相待而生勞,勞久了就發出塵,自相渾濁。

〔3·辨果相·世界相續〕(0120a12)『由此引起塵勞煩惱。動起而成為世界,靜止而成為虛空;虛空為同,世界為異。那無同無異的,才是真正的有為法。覺明與空昧相待而成搖動,所以有風輪執持世界。因空而生搖動,堅持其明而立礙,那金寶就是明覺所立的堅,所以有金輪保持國土。堅覺成了寶,搖明生出風,風與金相摩,所以有火光為變化之性;寶明生出潤,火光向上蒸騰,所以有水輪含容十方世界。火向上騰,水向下降,交互發動而立堅;濕的成為巨海,乾的成為洲潬。因為這個道理,那大海中火光常起,那洲潬中江河常流注。水勢劣於火,就凝結為高山,所以山石一擊就生火焰,一熔就成水。土勢劣於水,就抽長為草木,所以林藪遇燒就成土,因絞就成水。交互的妄相發生,遞相為種子;以這因緣,世界相續。

〔4·眾生相續〕(0120a25)『再者,富樓那!明的妄沒有別的,覺明本身就是過咎。所妄既然建立,明的理就不能踰越。以這因緣,聽不出於聲,見不超過色;色、香、味、觸等六妄成就,由此分開為見、覺、聞、知。同業互相纏縛,有合有離而成變化。見明則色發,明見則想成。異見成憎,同想成愛;流愛為種子,納想為胎。交遘發生,吸引同業,所以有因緣生出羯囉藍、遏蒱曇等。胎、卵、濕、化,隨其所應而生:卵唯由想而生,胎因情而有,濕以合而感,化以離而應。情、想、合、離更相變易,所有受業的眾生,隨其業或飛或沈;以這因緣,眾生相續。

〔5·業果相續〕(0120b05)『富樓那!想與愛同結,愛不能離,於是世間父母子孫相生不斷;這些都以欲貪為根本。貪與愛同滋長,貪不能止,於是世間卵生、化生、濕生、胎生,隨力量強弱遞相吞食;這些都以殺貪為根本。以人食羊,羊死為人,人死為羊,這樣乃至十類眾生,死死生生,互來相噉,惡業俱生,窮盡未來際;這些都以盜貪為根本。你欠我命,我還你債,以這因緣,經百千劫常在生死。你愛我心,我憐你色,以這因緣,經百千劫常在纏縛。唯有殺、盜、婬三者為根本,以這因緣,業果相續。

〔6·結答·如來喻釋〕(0120b14)『富樓那!這樣三種顛倒相續,都是覺明、明了知性,因了別而發相,從妄見而生。山河大地種種有為之相,次第遷流,因這虛妄,終而復始。』富樓那說:『如果這妙覺本來妙覺明,與如來心不增不減,無端忽然生出山河大地種種有為之相;如來如今已得妙空明覺,山河大地等有為習漏,什麼時候會再生起?』

〔6·結答·如來喻釋〕(0120b21)佛告訴富樓那:『譬如迷路的人,在一個聚落中把南當作北,這迷是因迷而有?還是因悟而出?』富樓那說:『這樣的迷人,既不因迷,也不因悟。為什麼呢?迷本來沒有根,怎麼說因迷?悟不會生迷,怎麼說因悟?』佛說:『那迷人正在迷的時候,忽有一個悟了的人指示他,使他覺悟。富樓那!你意下如何?這人縱然曾迷,在這聚落中還會再生迷嗎?』富樓那答:『不會的,世尊!』佛說:『富樓那!十方如來也是這樣。這迷沒有根本,其性畢竟是空。過去本來無迷,只是好像有迷有覺;覺了迷,迷就滅了,覺不再生迷。又如眼有瞖病的人看見空中的花,瞖病若除去,花就在空中滅了。忽有愚人,在那空花所滅的空處,等待花再生出來;你看這人是愚還是慧?』富樓那說:『空中原本無花,是妄見有生有滅;見花滅於空,已是顛倒,還要敕令它再生出來,這實在是狂癡;怎麼還要說這樣的狂人是愚是慧?』佛說:『如你所理解的,為什麼還問:『諸佛如來妙覺明空,什麼時候會再生出山河大地?』又如金鑛雜在精金之中,那金一旦純了,就不再成雜;如木成了灰,不會再成為木;諸佛如來的菩提涅槃,也是這樣。

〔7·答大性俱遍疑〕(0120c09)『富樓那!你又問:『地、水、火、風本性圓融周遍法界,疑惑水、火之性怎能不互相侵陵消滅?又徵問虛空與諸大地都遍法界,不應相容。』富樓那!譬如虛空,其體不是諸相,卻不拒絕那些相在其中發揮。為什麼呢?富樓那!那太虛空,日照就明,雲聚就暗,風搖就動,雨後天晴就清,氣凝就濁,土積成霾,水澄成映。你意下如何?這些不同方面的種種有為之相,是因那些而生?還是空所本有?如果是那些所生,富樓那!日照之時既是日的明,十方世界同為日色,為什麼空中還見一輪圓日?如果是空的明,空應當自己照,為什麼半夜雲霧之時,不生光耀?應當知道,這明不是日、不是空,又不異於空、日。觀相,原本是妄,無可指陳,就如同邀空花結成空菓,怎麼還詰問它們互相侵陵消滅的道理?觀性,原本是真,唯是妙覺明;妙覺明心本來就不是水、火,怎麼還問不相容呢!真妙覺明,也是這樣。

〔7·答大性俱遍疑〕(0120c23)『你以空來發明,就有空現;地、水、火、風各各發明,就各各現;如果一起發明,就一起現。怎麼一起現呢?富樓那!如同一片水中現出日影,兩人同觀水中的日,向東向西各自走去,就各有一日隨著二人而去;一東一西,原先並無定準。不應詰難說:『這日是一個,怎麼各自隨行?各日既是兩個,怎麼只現一個?』這樣宛轉虛妄,無可憑據。

〔7·答大性俱遍疑〕(0120c29)『富樓那!你以色與空在如來藏中相傾相奪,而如來藏便隨之為色、為空,周遍法界;所以其中有風動、空澄、日明、雲暗。眾生迷悶,背覺合塵,所以發出塵勞,有世間之相。我以不滅不生的妙明合於如來藏,而如來藏唯是妙覺明,圓照法界;所以其中一為無量、無量為一,小中現大、大中現小,不動道場而遍十方世界,身含十方無盡虛空,在一毛端現出寶王剎土,坐在微塵裏轉大法輪。滅塵合覺,所以發出真如妙覺明性。

〔7·答大性俱遍疑〕(0121a08)『而如來藏本妙圓心,不是心、不是空,不是地、不是水、不是風、不是火;不是眼、不是耳、鼻、舌、身、意,不是色、不是聲、香、味、觸、法;不是眼識界,如是乃至不是意識界;不是明、不是無明、不是明盡、不是無明盡,如是乃至不是老、不是死、不是老死盡;不是苦、不是集、不是滅、不是道;不是智、不是得;不是檀那〔布施〕、不是尸羅〔持戒〕、不是毘梨耶〔精進〕、不是羼提〔忍辱〕、不是禪那〔靜慮〕、不是鉢剌若〔智慧〕、不是波羅蜜多〔到彼岸〕;如是乃至不是怛闥阿竭〔如來〕,不是阿羅訶〔應供〕、三耶三菩〔正遍知〕;不是大涅槃,不是常、不是樂、不是我、不是淨;因為它俱非世間、出世間的緣故。而即如來藏元明心妙,即是心、即是空、即是地、即是水、即是風、即是火;即是眼、即是耳、鼻、舌、身、意,即是色、即是聲、香、味、觸、法;即是眼識界,如是乃至即是意識界;即是明、即是無明、即是明盡、即是無明盡,如是乃至即是老、即是死、即是老死盡;即是苦、即是集、即是滅、即是道;即是智、即是得;即是檀那、即是尸羅、即是毘梨耶、即是羼提、即是禪那、即是鉢剌若、即是波羅蜜多;如是乃至即是怛闥阿竭,即是阿羅訶、三耶三菩;即是大涅槃,即是常、即是樂、即是我、即是淨;因為它即俱世間、出世間的緣故。即如來藏妙明心元,既離於即,也離於非,是即,又是非即。怎麼能以世間三有眾生,以及出世間聲聞、緣覺的所知之心,測度如來的無上菩提!用世間的語言,入佛的知見!譬如琴、瑟、箜篌、琵琶,雖有妙音,若無妙指,終究不能發出。你與眾生也是這樣。寶覺真心各各圓滿,如我一按指,海印就發光;你暫一舉心,塵勞就先起;這是由於不勤求無上覺道,愛念小乘,得少為足。』

〔8·釋滿慈疑妄因〕(0121b04)富樓那說:『我與如來的寶覺圓明真妙淨心,無二而圓滿;但我往昔遭無始妄想,久在輪迴,如今得了聖乘,仍未究竟;世尊一切諸妄都已圓滅,獨有妙真常住。敢問如來:一切眾生因什麼而有妄,自己遮蔽了妙明,受這淪溺?』佛告訴富樓那:『你雖已除去疑,餘惑尚未盡。我以世間現前的事,如今再問你:你難道沒聽說,室羅城中的演若達多,忽然在早晨以鏡照面,喜愛鏡中的頭眉目可見,卻嗔責自己的頭看不見面目,以為是魑魅,無端狂走?你意下如何?這人因什麼無故狂走?』

〔8·釋滿慈疑妄因〕(0121b14)富樓那說:『這人是心狂,再沒有別的緣故。』佛說:『妙覺明圓、本圓明妙,既稱為妄,怎麼會有因?如果有所因,怎麼名為妄?只是諸妄想展轉相因,從迷積迷,以歷塵劫;雖經佛發明,仍不能返。這樣的迷因,是因迷而自有。認識到迷無因,妄便無所依;尚且沒有生,要滅什麼?得菩提的人,如同醒時的人說夢中事;心縱然精明,要以什麼因緣取得夢中之物?何況本來無因,本無所有。就如那城中的演若達多,難道有什麼因緣,自己怖頭而走?忽然狂歇,頭並不是從外得來;縱然狂未歇,又何曾遺失?富樓那!妄性就是這樣,因又在哪裡?你只要不隨順分別世間、業果、眾生三種相續,三緣斷了,三因就不生,那麼你心中演若達多的狂性自然歇止。歇即是菩提,殊勝清淨的明心本來周遍法界,不是從他人得來;何必藉著劬勞,在肯綮之處用力修證?

〔8·釋滿慈疑妄因〕(0121b28)『譬如有人,在自己衣中繫著如意珠,自己不覺知,窮困流落他方,乞食奔走;雖然確實貧窮,珠卻不曾失。忽有智者指示他那顆珠,於是所願隨心,得大饒富,方才悟到神珠不是從外得來。』

〔9·釋慶喜難緣起〕(0121c03)當即阿難在大眾中,頂禮佛足,起立對佛說:『世尊現在說:『殺、盜、婬業三緣斷了,三因就不生;心中達多的狂性自然歇止,歇即是菩提,不從他人得來。』這便是因緣,皎然明白,為什麼如來頓然捨棄因緣?我是從因緣而心得開悟的。世尊!這義理何止我們年少有學的聲聞,如今這會中的大目犍連,以及舍利弗、須菩提等,原是老梵志,從外道中來,聞佛說因緣,發心開悟,得成無漏。如今說菩提不從因緣,那麼王舍城拘舍梨等所說的自然,就成了第一義!唯願垂大悲,開發我們的迷悶!』

〔9·釋慶喜難緣起〕(0121c12)佛告訴阿難:『就如城中的演若達多,狂性的因緣若能滅除,那麼不狂之性就自然而出。因緣與自然的道理,窮盡於此。阿難!演若達多的頭本是自然,本來自是如此,無一不是自然,因什麼因緣而怖頭狂走?如果自然之頭因因緣而狂,為什麼不也自然地因因緣而失去?本頭不失,狂怖妄出,頭曾無變易,何必藉因緣?如果本來的狂是自然,本就有狂怖,那麼未狂之時,狂潛藏在哪裡?如果不狂是自然,頭本無妄,為什麼狂走?如果悟得本頭,識知狂走,因緣、自然都是戲論。所以我說:『三緣斷了,即是菩提心。』菩提心生,生滅心滅,這仍只是生滅;滅與生都盡,才是無功用道。如果有自然,像這樣便是顯明自然心生,生滅心滅,這也是生滅;無生滅的才名為自然。如同世間諸相雜和而成一體的,名為和合性;不和合的,稱為本然性。本然非然,和合非合,合與然都離,離與合都非,這句才名為無戲論法。

〔9·釋慶喜難緣起〕(0121c26)『菩提涅槃還在遙遠,不是你歷劫辛勤修證所能得;縱然你憶持十方如來十二部經的清淨妙理,多如恒河沙,只增益戲論。你雖談說因緣、自然,決定明了,人間稱你多聞第一,以這積劫多聞的薰習,卻不能免離摩登伽之難,還須等待我的佛頂神呪。摩登伽心中的婬火頓時歇止,得阿那含果,在我法中成為精進林,愛河乾枯,使你得以解脫。所以阿難!你雖歷劫憶持如來祕密妙嚴,不如一日修無漏業,遠離世間憎、愛二苦。如摩登伽過去本是婬女,由神呪之力銷除她的愛欲,在法中如今名為性比丘尼。她與羅睺羅之母耶輸陀羅同悟宿因,知道歷世以來因貪愛而苦,一念薰修無漏善的緣故,或得出離纏縛,或蒙佛授記。你怎麼還自欺,仍停留在觀聽之上!』

〔10·阿難領悟祈修·總告許宣〕(0122a10)阿難以及諸大眾,聽聞佛的開示教誨,疑惑銷除,心悟實相,身意輕安,得未曾有!又再悲泣流淚,頂禮佛足,長跪合掌,對佛說:『無上大悲清淨寶王,善開我心!能以這樣種種因緣方便提攜獎勸,引導諸沈冥的眾生出離苦海。世尊!我如今雖承受這樣的法音,知道如來藏妙覺明心遍十方世界,含育如來十方國土、清淨寶嚴妙覺王剎;如來又責備多聞無功,不及修習。我如今就像旅途寄宿的人,忽然蒙天王賜給一座華屋,雖然得到大宅,還要從門才能進入。唯願如來不捨大悲,指示我們在會中這些蒙昧闇鈍的人捐捨小乘,終獲如來無餘涅槃的本發心路!使有學的人知道從何處攝伏往日的攀緣,得陀羅尼,入佛知見?』說完這話,五體投地。在會大眾一心,佇候佛的慈旨。

〔10·阿難領悟祈修·總告許宣〕(0122a23)這時,世尊哀愍會中緣覺、聲聞於菩提心尚未自在的人,以及為了當來佛滅度後末法時期發菩提心的眾生,開示無上乘的妙修行路。宣示阿難及諸大眾:『你們決定發菩提心,對佛如來的妙三摩提不生疲惓,應當先明白發覺初心的二種決定義。

〔11·因果同異門〕(0122a27)『怎樣是初心的二義決定?阿難!第一義是:你們如果想捐捨聲聞,修菩薩乘,入佛知見,應當審觀因地的發心,與果地的覺是同還是異?阿難!如果在因地以生滅心為本修因,而求佛乘的不生不滅,沒有這樣的道理。

〔11·因果同異門〕(0122b03)『因為這個道理,你應當照明:諸器世間凡可造作之法,都歸於變滅。阿難!你看世間可造作之法,哪一樣不壞?然而終究不曾聽說虛空爛壞。為什麼呢?空不是可造作的,所以始終沒有壞滅。那麼你身中,堅相為地,潤濕為水,煖觸為火,動搖為風。由這四種纏縛,把你湛圓的妙覺明心分為視、為聽、為覺、為察,從始入終,五重疊加而成渾濁。什麼是濁?阿難!譬如清水,清潔本然;那些塵土灰沙之類,本質是留礙;二者的體性法爾如此,性不相隨。有世間人,取那土塵投入淨水,土失去了留礙,水失去了清潔,容貌汩然渾亂,名之為濁。你的五重濁,也是這樣。

〔11·因果同異門〕(0122b13)『阿難!你見虛空遍十方界,空與見不分。有空而無體,有見而無覺,二者相織,妄然而成;這是第一重,名為劫濁。你的身體現在摶取四大為體,見、聞、覺、知被壅塞而成留礙,水、火、風、土旋轉而成覺知,相織妄成;這是第二重,名為見濁。又你心中憶識誦習,自性發出知見,容現六塵;離塵則無相,離覺則無性,相織妄成;這是第三重,名為煩惱濁。又你朝夕生滅不停,知見常想留在世間,業運常常遷移於國土,相織妄成;這是第四重,名為眾生濁。你們的見與聞原本無異性,被眾塵隔越,無端生出差異;在性中相知,在用中相背,同異失去準則,相織妄成;這是第五重,名為命濁。

〔11·因果同異門〕(0122b24)『阿難!你如今想使見、聞、覺、知遠契如來的常、樂、我、淨,應當先擇定死生的根本,依不生滅的圓湛之性而成就;以湛旋轉那虛妄的滅與生,伏而還歸元覺,得元明覺無生滅之性,作為因地心;然後圓成果地的修證。如同澄清濁水,貯在淨器中,靜深不動,沙土自然沈下,清水現前,名為初伏客塵煩惱;去掉泥只留純水,名為永斷根本無明。明相精純,一切變現都不成煩惱,皆合於涅槃清淨妙德。

〔12·根塵結解門〕(0122c03)『第二義是:你們若必定要發菩提心,在菩薩乘生起大勇猛,決定棄捐諸有為相,應當審詳煩惱的根本:這無始以來發業潤生的,是誰作、誰受?阿難!你修菩提,若不審觀煩惱根本,就不能知道虛妄的根塵在何處顛倒;處尚且不知,怎麼降伏,取如來位?阿難!你看世間解結的人,不見所結之處,怎麼知道解?卻不曾聽說虛空被你毀裂。為什麼呢?空沒有相形,無結也無解。那麼你現前的眼、耳、鼻、舌,以及身、心,這六者為賊媒,自劫家中寶物;由此,無始以來眾生世界生起纏縛,對器世間不能超越。

〔13·別示根用優劣〕(0122c12)『阿難!什麼叫作眾生世界?世是遷流,界是方位。你如今應當知道,東、西、南、北、東南、西南、東北、西北、上、下為界,過去、未來、現在為世;方位有十,流數有三。一切眾生織妄相成,身中貿遷,世與界相涉。而這界性,縱然十方定位可以分明,世間只指東、西、南、北;上、下沒有定位,中間沒有定方。四方之數必然分明,與世相涉;三四、四三,宛轉成十二;流變三疊,一、十、百、千。總括始終,六根之中,各各功德有一千二百。

〔13·別示根用優劣〕(0122c20)『阿難!你再在其中克定優劣。如眼的觀見,後面暗、前面明,前方全明,後方全暗,左右旁觀只得三分之二;統論其所作,功德不全;三分之中言其有功,一分無德;應當知道眼唯有八百功德。如耳周遍聽聞十方無遺,動時若近若遠,靜時無有邊際;應當知道耳根圓滿一千二百功德。如鼻嗅聞,通於出入之息,有出有入,而缺中間交接;驗於鼻根,三分缺一;應當知道鼻唯有八百功德。如舌宣揚,窮盡諸世間、出世間之智,言有方分,理無窮盡;應當知道舌根圓滿一千二百功德。如身覺觸,識知違順,合時能覺,離時不知,離時只一分,合時具雙分;驗於身根,三分缺一;應當知道身唯有八百功德。如意默然容納十方三世一切世間、出世間法,無論聖與凡,無不包容,盡其涯際;應當知道意根圓滿一千二百功德。

〔14·令揀圓根修證〕(0123a05)『阿難!你如今想逆生死欲流,返窮流根,至於不生滅,應當驗察這六種受用根:誰合、誰離?誰深、誰淺?誰為圓通?誰不圓滿?如果能於此悟得圓通之根,逆那無始織妄的業流,得以隨順圓通,與不圓之根相比,功效如日與劫相倍。我如今具顯六湛圓明本所具的功德,數量如此。隨你詳細選擇其中可入的,我當為你發明,使你增進。十方如來於十八界一一修行,都得圓滿無上菩提,其中也無優劣。只因你下劣,未能於其中得圓融自在之慧,所以我宣揚,使你只於一門深入;入一而無妄,那六知根一時清淨。』

〔14·令揀圓根修證〕(0123a15)阿難對佛說:『世尊!怎樣逆流深入一門,能使六根一時清淨?』

〔14·令揀圓根修證〕(0123a17)佛告訴阿難:『你如今已得須陀洹果,已滅三界眾生世間見所斷之惑;然而仍不知根中積生的無始虛習,那習要因修所斷才能斷得,何況這當中生、住、異、滅的分劑頭數?現在你且觀察現前的六根,是一還是六?阿難!如果說是一,耳為什麼不能見?目為什麼不能聞?頭為什麼不能行走?足為什麼不能言語?如果這六根決定成六,如我如今在會中與你宣揚微妙法門,你的六根是誰來領受?』阿難說:『我用耳朵聽聞。』佛說:『你的耳自己聽聞,與身、口有什麼相干?口來問義,身起欽承。所以應當知道:不是一,終成六;不是六,終成一。終究不是你的根元本是一、元本是六。阿難!應當知道,這根非一非六;由無始以來顛倒淪替,所以在圓湛之中,生出一與六之義。你這須陀洹,雖得六銷,仍未亡一。如同太虛空參合在群器之中,由於器形不同,名之為異空;除去器物觀空,說空為一。那太虛空,怎麼會為你成同、不同?何況更名之為是一、非一?那麼你所了知的六受用根,也是這樣。

〔15·廣明根結之由·正示入一之門〕(0123b03)『由明、暗等二種相形,在妙圓之中粘湛而發見,見精映色,結色而成根;根元稱為清淨四大,因此名為眼體,形如蒲萄朵,浮根四塵流逸奔向於色。由動、靜等二種相擊,在妙圓之中粘湛而發聽,聽精映聲,卷聲而成根;根元稱為清淨四大,因此名為耳體,形如新卷的葉,浮根四塵流逸奔向於聲。由通、塞等二種相發,在妙圓之中粘湛而發嗅,嗅精映香,納香而成根;根元稱為清淨四大,因此名為鼻體,形如雙垂的爪,浮根四塵流逸奔向於香。由恬、變等二種相參,在妙圓之中粘湛而發嘗,嘗精映味,絞味而成根;根元稱為清淨四大,因此名為舌體,形如初偃的月,浮根四塵流逸奔向於味。由離、合等二種相摩,在妙圓之中粘湛而發覺,覺精映觸,搏觸而成根;根元稱為清淨四大,因此名為身體,形如腰鼓之顙,浮根四塵流逸奔向於觸。由生、滅等二種相續,在妙圓之中粘湛而發知,知精映法,覽法而成根;根元稱為清淨四大,因此名為意思,如在幽室中見物,浮根四塵流逸奔向於法。

〔15·廣明根結之由·正示入一之門〕(0123b20)『阿難!這樣的六根,由那覺明,有了明明之覺,失去那精了,粘妄而發光。所以你如今離暗、離明就沒有見的體,離動、離靜原本沒有聽的質,無通、無塞則嗅性不生,非變、非恬則嘗無所出,不離、不合則覺觸本無,無滅、無生則了知安寄!你只要不隨順動靜、合離、恬變、通塞、生滅、暗明這十二種有為之相;隨拔一根,脫粘內伏,伏歸元真,發出本明之耀;耀性發明,其餘五粘應時拔除,圓滿解脫;不由前塵所起的知見,明不循根,寄託於根而明發,由此六根互相為用。

〔15·廣明根結之由·正示入一之門〕(0123b29)『阿難!你難道不知道,如今這會中,阿那律陀無目而能見;跋難陀龍無耳而能聽;殑伽神女非鼻而聞香;驕梵鉢提以異舌而知味;舜若多神無身而有觸,在如來光中映照,使其暫現,既是風質,其體原本是無;諸滅盡定得寂的聲聞,如這會中的摩訶迦葉,久已滅了意根,圓明了知,不因心念。阿難!如今你的諸根若圓滿拔除,內瑩發光;這樣浮塵以及器世間的種種變化之相,如同熱湯銷氷,應念化成無上知覺。阿難!如那世人把見聚在眼上,若使眼急合,暗相現前;六根黯然,頭足相類。那人以手沿著身體外面循繞,他雖不見,頭與足一一辨別,知覺是同。緣見因明,暗時就成無見;不明而自發,那麼諸暗相永不能使之昏昧。根塵既已銷盡,怎麼覺明不成圓妙?』

〔16·別破疑情〕(0123c13)阿難對佛說:『世尊!如佛說:『在因地的覺心想求常住,要與果位的名目相應。』世尊!如果位中,菩提、涅槃、真如、佛性、菴摩羅識、空如來藏、大圓鏡智,這七種名稱,稱謂雖然有別,清淨圓滿,體性堅凝,如金剛王常住不壞。如果這見、聽離開暗明、動靜、通塞,畢竟無體;就像念心離開前塵,本無所有。怎麼能將這畢竟斷滅的作為修因,想獲得如來七常住果?世尊!如果離開明暗,見畢竟是空;如同沒有前塵,念自性滅。我進退循環,微細推求,本無我心以及我心所,將誰來立因,求無上覺?如來先前說湛精圓常,違越了誠實之言,終成戲論;怎麼說如來是真實語者?唯願垂大慈,開我蒙悋!』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0123c25)佛告訴阿難:『你學習多聞,尚未盡諸漏,心中只知道顛倒的所因,真正的顛倒現前,實在未能認識。恐怕你的誠心仍未信伏,我如今試著拿塵俗諸事,來除你的疑。』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0123c27)當即如來敕令羅睺羅擊鍾一聲,問阿難說:『你現在聽到了嗎?』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0123c29)阿難和大眾都說:『我聽到了。』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0123c29)鍾聲歇止,沒有聲音,佛又問:『你現在聽到了嗎?』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a01)阿難和大眾都說:『聽不到。』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a01)這時羅睺羅又擊一聲,佛又問:『你現在聽到了嗎?』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a02)阿難和大眾又說:『都聽到了。』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a03)佛問阿難:『你怎麼叫作聽到?怎麼叫作聽不到?』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a03)阿難和大眾都對佛說:『鍾聲若擊,我就得以聽到;擊久了聲音銷歇,音響都斷絕了,就叫作聽不到。』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a05)如來又敕令羅睺擊鍾,問阿難說:『你現在有聲嗎?』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a06)阿難和大眾都說:『有聲。』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a06)不一會兒聲音銷歇,佛又問:『你現在有聲嗎?』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a07)阿難和大眾答說:『無聲。』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a07)過了一會兒,羅睺又來撞鍾,佛又問:『你現在有聲嗎?』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a08)阿難和大眾都說:『有聲。』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a09)佛問阿難:『你怎麼叫作有聲?怎麼叫作無聲?』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a09)阿難和大眾都對佛說:『鍾聲若擊,就叫作有聲;擊久了聲音銷歇,音響都斷絕了,就叫作無聲。』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a11)佛對阿難及諸大眾說:『你們現在為什麼自語矯亂?』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a12)大眾和阿難同時問佛:『我們現在為什麼叫作矯亂?』

〔17·如來為斷〕(0124a13)佛說:『我問你們聞,你們就說聞;又問你們聲,你們就說聲。只是聞與聲,你們的報答沒有定準,這樣怎麼不叫作矯亂?

〔18·就聞性破其斷見〕(0124a15)『阿難!聲音銷歇,沒有響聲,你說沒有聞;如果真的沒有聞,聞性已滅,同於枯木,鍾聲再擊時,你怎麼知道?知有、知無,自是聲塵或無或有,難道那聞性會為你而有、無?聞如果真的是無,誰知道那無?所以阿難!聲在聞中自有生滅;並非因為你聞到聲生、聲滅,就使你的聞性為有、為無。你尚且顛倒,把聲誤當作聞,難怪昏迷,以常為斷?終究不應說離開諸動靜、閉塞、開通,聞就沒有性。

〔18·就聞性破其斷見〕(0124a22)『如同熟睡的人眠於床枕,他家中有人在他睡時擣練、舂米,那人在夢中聽到舂擣之聲,別作他物,或以為擊鼓,或以為撞鍾;就在夢時,自己奇怪那鍾怎麼發出木石之響。這時忽然醒來,立刻知道是杵的聲音。自己告訴家人:『我正做夢時,誤把這舂米聲當作鼓響。』阿難!這人在夢中,難道會憶念靜搖、開閉、通塞?他的形體雖然睡著,聞性並不昏昧。縱然你形體銷亡、命光遷謝,這性怎麼會為你而銷滅?因為諸眾生從無始以來,隨順諸色、聲,逐念流轉,不曾開悟性淨妙常。不隨順所常,追逐諸生滅,由此生生世世雜染流轉。如果捨棄生滅,守於真常,常光現前,塵根、識心應時銷落。想相是塵,識情是垢,二者都遠離,那麼你的法眼應時清明,怎麼不成無上知覺?』

卷尾題:『大佛頂萬行首楞嚴經卷第四』。

Fascicle Four of the Śūraṅgama Sūtra, translated by Pramiti of the Tang, from the fascicle title to the closing title of the fascicle. Pūrṇa asks how, being pure and originally so, there suddenly arise mountains, rivers, and the great earth, and how earth, water, fire, and wind can all pervade without encroaching upon and destroying one another; the Tathāgata answers that the nature-awakening is necessarily bright and falsely it is taken as a bright awakening, whence the three kinds of continuity—of the world, of living beings, and of action and result—while the tathāgatagarbha accordingly becomes form and emptiness, apart from ‘is’ and apart from ‘is not.’ Further, by the simile of Yajñadatta he shows that falsity has no cause, and rejects causes and conditions and spontaneity alike as idle disputation. Ānanda asks for the practice, and the Tathāgata opens up the two decisive meanings—carefully examining the resolve at the stage of cause, and carefully examining the root of the afflictions—shows the superior and inferior merits of the six faculties and the origin of the faculties’ knots, and at the end, by striking the bell, verifies that the nature of hearing is truly permanent. The figures in parentheses at the head of each segment give the Taishō page, register, and line.

〔0 · Title and Translator’s Attribution〕(0119c02)The head of the fascicle bears the title “The Great Buddha-Crown Sūtra of the Tathāgata’s Secret Cause, Cultivation and Realization of the Complete Meaning, and the Myriad Practices of All Bodhisattvas, Called Śūraṅgama, Fascicle Four [also called the Great Bodhimaṇḍa Sūtra of Nālandā in Central India, copied out from the Consecration Section to circulate separately]”: the name of the sūtra is The Great Buddha-Crown Sūtra of the Tathāgata’s Secret Cause, Cultivation and Realization of the Complete Meaning, and the Myriad Practices of All Bodhisattvas, Called Śūraṅgama, and this is Fascicle Four; the interlinear note beneath the title says that this sūtra is also called the Great Bodhimaṇḍa Sūtra of Nālandā in Central India, and that it was copied out from the Consecration Section and circulates on its own. The translator’s attribution is a single line, “Translated by the śramaṇa Pramiti of India, of the Tang.”—Pramiti, a śramaṇa of India in the Tang dynasty, translated it. In the Taishō text, the head of the fascicle has no collation notes on the fascicle title or the attribution.

〔1 · The Request · Consent to Expound〕(0119c07)At that time Pūrṇa Maitrāyaṇīputra, in the midst of the great assembly, rose at once from his seat, bared his right shoulder, knelt on his right knee, joined his palms respectfully, and said to the Buddha: ‘Greatly majestic and virtuous World-Honored One! You skillfully expound for beings the truth of the foremost meaning of the Tathāgata. The World-Honored One has always commended me as foremost among those who teach the Dharma; yet now, hearing the subtle and wondrous Dharma-voice of the Tathāgata, I am like a deaf man a hundred paces away listening for a mosquito: from the first he cannot even see it, much less hear it. Although the Buddha has proclaimed it clearly, to make me rid myself of doubt, I still cannot yet fully grasp this meaning and reach the ground of ultimate freedom from doubt. World-Honored One! Those like Ānanda, although they have awakened, have not yet rid themselves of habit-energy and of what has outflows; and those of us in the assembly who have ascended to the state without outflows, although we have exhausted all the outflows, now on hearing the Dharma-voice spoken by the Tathāgata still have doubt and regret entangling our minds. World-Honored One! If all the faculties, dusts, aggregates, bases, realms, and so on in the world are all the tathāgatagarbha, pure and originally so, why do there suddenly arise mountains, rivers, and the great earth, and all the conditioned appearances, shifting and flowing in sequence, ending and beginning again? Further, the Tathāgata says that earth, water, fire, and wind are by nature perfectly interfused, pervading the dharma-realm, profoundly clear and permanently abiding. World-Honored One! If the nature of earth pervades everywhere, how can it admit water? If the nature of water pervades everywhere, fire cannot arise. And how is it explained that the two natures of water and fire both fill all of space without encroaching upon and destroying each other? World-Honored One! The nature of earth is obstructive and the nature of space is open and penetrating; how can both pervade the dharma-realm? I do not know where this meaning leads. I only ask that the Tathāgata let his great compassion flow forth and open the clouds of my confusion, and the clouds of confusion of all the great assembly!’ Having said this, he cast his five limbs to the ground, reverently longing for the Tathāgata’s unsurpassed compassionate teaching.

〔1 · The Request · Consent to Expound〕(0119c25)At that time the World-Honored One said to Pūrṇa and to all the arhats in the assembly whose outflows were exhausted, beyond training: ‘Today the Tathāgata will proclaim, universally for this assembly, the nature of true supreme meaning within the supreme meaning, so that the fixed-nature śrāvakas in your assembly, and all the arhats who have not yet realized the two emptinesses and who turn toward the higher vehicle, may all obtain the ground of quiescence of the One Vehicle, the place of right practice of the true araṇya. Listen now attentively! I will explain it for you.’ Pūrṇa and the others, reverently awaiting the Buddha’s Dharma-voice, received it in silence and listened.

〔2 · Answering the Doubt about How Appearances Arise from the Nature of the tathāgatagarbha〕(0120a02)The Buddha said: ‘Pūrṇa! As you say, “Pure and originally so—why do there suddenly arise mountains, rivers, and the great earth?” Have you not always heard the Tathāgata proclaim that the nature-awakening is wondrously bright and the original awakening is brightly wondrous?’ Pūrṇa said: ‘Yes, World-Honored One! I have always heard the Buddha proclaim this meaning.’ The Buddha said: ‘What you call awakened brightness—is it that the nature is bright of itself and so is named awakening? Or is it that awakening is originally not bright, and is called bright awakening only when brightness is added to it?’ Pūrṇa said: ‘If this which is not bright is called awakening, then there is nothing that is brightened.’ The Buddha said: ‘If there is nothing that is brightened, there is no bright awakening. What has something brightened is not awakening; what has nothing brightened is not brightness; and non-brightness, again, is not the nature of awakening’s profound brightness. The nature-awakening is necessarily bright of itself; falsely adding brightness to it, it becomes a bright awakening. Awakening is originally not something brightened; because of brightening, an object is set up; once the object is falsely set up, your false subject is born. Within what is originally neither-same-nor-different, difference blazes forth. Differing from what is differentiated, sameness is set up because of difference; sameness and difference bringing each other to light, because of this there is further set up what is neither same nor different. Disturbed in this way, each waiting on the other gives rise to strain; strain long continued gives rise to dust, which muddies itself.

〔3 · Discerning the Resultant Appearances · The Continuity of the World〕(0120a12)‘From this arise the toils of the dusts and the afflictions. Arising, it becomes the world; at rest, it becomes empty space; empty space is sameness, the world is difference. That which is neither same nor different is truly the conditioned dharma. Awakened brightness and the dimness of space, waiting on each other, become shaking; so there is the wind-wheel holding up the world. Because of space, shaking arises; holding firm to its brightness, obstruction is set up; that metal treasure is the hardness set up by bright awakening; so there is the metal-wheel safeguarding the lands. Hardened awakening becomes treasure; shaking brightness gives rise to wind; wind and metal rub against each other, so there is the light of fire as the nature of transformation. The brightness of the treasure gives rise to moisture, and the light of fire steams upward, so there is the water-wheel containing the worlds of the ten directions. Fire rises upward and water descends; acting on each other they set up what is firm: the wet becomes the great ocean, the dry becomes continents and sandbanks. Because of this principle, in that great ocean the light of fire constantly rises, and on those continents and sandbanks the rivers constantly flow. Where the force of water is weaker than fire, it congeals into high mountains; so stone from the mountains gives out flame when struck and becomes water when melted. Where the force of earth is weaker than water, it draws out into grasses and trees; so forests and thickets become earth when burned and give out water when wrung. Falsities arising in exchange, each in turn becomes the seed of the other; by these causes and conditions, there is the continuity of the world.

〔4 · The Continuity of Living Beings〕(0120a25)‘Further, Pūrṇa! The falsity of brightening is nothing other: awakened brightness itself is the fault. Once the false object is set up, the principle of brightening cannot be passed beyond. By these causes and conditions, hearing does not go beyond sound, and seeing does not pass beyond form; the six falsities of form, scent, taste, touch, and so on are accomplished, and from them are divided seeing, feeling, hearing, and knowing. Those of the same action bind one another; uniting and separating, they bring about transformation. When seeing is bright, form arises; when brightness is seen, thought is formed. Differing views become hatred; shared thoughts become love; flowing love becomes the seed, and taking in thought becomes the embryo. Coupling gives rise to it and draws in those of the same action; so, through causes and conditions, there are born the kalala, the arbuda, and so on. The mother-born, egg-born, moisture-born, and transformation-born are born each as is fitting: the egg-born arise only from thought, the mother-born exist because of feeling, the moisture-born are stirred through union, and the transformation-born respond through separation. Feeling, thought, union, and separation change into one another in turn; all beings who receive action, according to their action, fly up or sink down; by these causes and conditions, there is the continuity of living beings.

〔5 · The Continuity of Action and Result〕(0120b05)‘Pūrṇa! Thought and love bind together, and love cannot part; so in the world fathers and mothers, children and grandchildren, beget one another without ceasing; all of these have the greed of desire as their root. Greed and love grow together, and greed cannot stop; so in the world the egg-born, transformation-born, moisture-born, and mother-born, according to the strength or weakness of their power, devour one another in turn; all of these have the greed of killing as their root. A person eats a sheep; the sheep dies and becomes a person, the person dies and becomes a sheep; and so on to the ten classes of beings, dying and being born, being born and dying, coming to devour one another, evil action arising together, to the end of the future; all of these have the greed of stealing as their root. You owe me a life, I repay you a debt; by these causes and conditions, through hundreds of thousands of kalpas one is constantly in birth and death. You love my mind, I cherish your form; by these causes and conditions, through hundreds of thousands of kalpas one is constantly in bondage. Only killing, stealing, and lust, these three, are the root; by these causes and conditions, there is the continuity of action and result.

〔6 · Concluding the Answer · The Tathāgata Explains by Simile〕(0120b14)‘Pūrṇa! These three kinds of inverted continuity are all awakened brightness, the nature of clear knowing: because of discerning, appearances are sent forth, arising from false seeing. Mountains, rivers, and the great earth, all the conditioned appearances, shift and flow in sequence; because of this falsity, they end and begin again.’ Pūrṇa said: ‘If this wondrous awakening is originally wondrously awakened and bright, neither increased nor decreased with the mind of the Tathāgata, and without cause there suddenly arise mountains, rivers, and the great earth and all the conditioned appearances—then now that the Tathāgata has attained the wondrous, empty, bright awakening, when will mountains, rivers, the great earth, and the conditioned habits and outflows arise again?’

〔6 · Concluding the Answer · The Tathāgata Explains by Simile〕(0120b21)The Buddha said to Pūrṇa: ‘It is like a man who has lost his way and, in a village, takes south for north. Is this confusion there because of confusion? Or does it come out because of awakening?’ Pūrṇa said: ‘Such a confused man is neither because of confusion nor because of awakening. Why? Confusion originally has no root; how can it be said to be because of confusion? Awakening does not give birth to confusion; how can it be said to be because of awakening?’ The Buddha said: ‘While that confused man is confused, suddenly an awakened man points it out to him and makes him awaken. Pūrṇa! What do you think? Even though this man was once confused, will he become confused again in this village?’ Pūrṇa answered: ‘No, World-Honored One!’ The Buddha said: ‘Pūrṇa! The Tathāgatas of the ten directions are also like this. This confusion has no root; its nature is ultimately empty. In the past there was originally no confusion; it only seemed that there was confusion and awakening. When confusion is awakened from, confusion perishes, and awakening does not give birth to confusion again. Again, it is like a man whose eyes have cataracts seeing flowers in the sky; if the cataract is removed, the flowers vanish in the sky. Suppose a foolish man, at the place in the sky where those sky-flowers vanished, waits for the flowers to be born again; would you consider this man foolish or wise?’ Pūrṇa said: ‘There were originally no flowers in the sky; it is false seeing that they arise and perish. To see the flowers vanish into the sky is already inverted; to go further and command them to be born again is truly madness and folly. Why go on to ask whether such a madman is foolish or wise?’ The Buddha said: ‘As you understand it, why do you still ask, “When will the wondrous awakened bright emptiness of the Buddhas, the Tathāgatas, give rise again to mountains, rivers, and the great earth?” Again, it is like gold ore mixed with pure gold: once the gold is pure, it does not become mixed again; as when wood becomes ash, it does not become wood again. The bodhi and nirvāṇa of the Buddhas, the Tathāgatas, are also like this.

〔7 · Answering the Doubt about the Elements All Pervading〕(0120c09)‘Pūrṇa! You also asked: “Earth, water, fire, and wind are by nature perfectly interfused, pervading the dharma-realm; so I doubt how the natures of water and fire could fail to encroach upon and destroy each other; and I further question how empty space and all the great earth could both pervade the dharma-realm, since they ought not to admit each other.” Pūrṇa! It is like empty space, whose substance is not any of the many appearances, and yet which does not refuse those appearances their display. Why? Pūrṇa! That great empty space is bright when the sun shines, dark when clouds gather, moving when the wind stirs, clear when the sky clears after rain, turbid when vapors congeal, hazy when earth accumulates, and reflecting when water is still. What do you think? These conditioned appearances of different aspects—are they born because of those things? Or does space possess them of itself? If they are born of those things, Pūrṇa! then when the sun shines, since it is the sun’s brightness, the worlds of the ten directions would all be the color of the sun; why is a round sun still seen in the sky? If it were the brightness of space, space ought to shine of itself; why, at midnight when there are clouds and mist, does it not give off light? You should know that this brightness is neither the sun nor space, and yet is not different from space and the sun. Looking at the appearances, they are originally false and cannot be pointed out; it is like inviting sky-flowers to bear the fruit of the void—how then can you question the principle of their encroaching upon and destroying each other? Looking at the nature, it is originally true, only the wondrous awakened brightness; the wondrous awakened bright mind is from the first not water or fire—how then can you ask about their not admitting each other! The true, wondrous awakened brightness is also like this.

〔7 · Answering the Doubt about the Elements All Pervading〕(0120c23)‘When you bring it to light by means of space, there is space appearing; when earth, water, fire, and wind are each brought to light, each appears; if they are brought to light together, they appear together. How do they appear together? Pūrṇa! It is like the reflection of the sun appearing in one body of water: two people look together at the sun in the water and go off east and west, and then each has a sun following the two people as they go—one east, one west, with no fixed standard from the first. One should not object, saying, “This sun is one; how does it follow each? Since each sun is two, how does only one appear?” Twisting and turning in falsity like this, there is nothing to rely on.

〔7 · Answering the Doubt about the Elements All Pervading〕(0120c29)‘Pūrṇa! You take form and emptiness to overturn and seize from each other within the tathāgatagarbha, and the tathāgatagarbha accordingly becomes form and becomes emptiness, pervading the dharma-realm; so within it there is the wind moving, space clear, the sun bright, and clouds dark. Beings, confused and stupefied, turn from awakening to join the dusts; so the toils of the dusts arise, and there are the appearances of the world. I, with the wondrous brightness that neither perishes nor arises, join the tathāgatagarbha, and the tathāgatagarbha is only the wondrous awakened brightness, perfectly illumining the dharma-realm; so within it the one is immeasurable and the immeasurable is one; in the small the great appears, and in the great the small appears; without moving from the bodhimaṇḍa it pervades the worlds of the ten directions; the body contains the endless empty space of the ten directions; on the tip of a single hair it manifests the land of a Jeweled King; sitting within a mote of dust it turns the great Dharma-wheel. Extinguishing the dusts to join awakening, it therefore gives rise to the wondrous awakened bright nature of suchness.

〔7 · Answering the Doubt about the Elements All Pervading〕(0121a08)‘And the tathāgatagarbha, the originally wondrous perfect mind, is not mind, not space, not earth, not water, not wind, not fire; not eye, not ear, nose, tongue, body, or mind; not form, not sound, scent, taste, touch, or dharmas; not the realm of eye-consciousness, and so on up to not the realm of mind-consciousness; not brightness, not ignorance, not the ending of brightness, not the ending of ignorance, and so on up to not old age, not death, not the ending of old age and death; not suffering, not origination, not cessation, not the path; not wisdom, not attainment; not dāna [giving], not śīla [keeping the precepts], not vīrya [vigor], not kṣānti [patience], not dhyāna [stillness and reflection], not prajñā [wisdom], not pāramitā [reaching the other shore]; and so on up to not tathāgata [Thus Come One], not arhat [Worthy of Offerings] or samyak-saṃbuddha [Right and Universal Knowledge]; not great nirvāṇa, not permanence, not bliss, not self, not purity—because it is neither of them all, worldly or world-transcending. And that very tathāgatagarbha, the original bright wondrous mind, is mind, is space, is earth, is water, is wind, is fire; is eye, is ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind; is form, is sound, scent, taste, touch, and dharmas; is the realm of eye-consciousness, and so on up to is the realm of mind-consciousness; is brightness, is ignorance, is the ending of brightness, is the ending of ignorance, and so on up to is old age, is death, is the ending of old age and death; is suffering, is origination, is cessation, is the path; is wisdom, is attainment; is dāna, is śīla, is vīrya, is kṣānti, is dhyāna, is prajñā, is pāramitā; and so on up to is tathāgata, is arhat and samyak-saṃbuddha; is great nirvāṇa, is permanence, is bliss, is self, is purity—because it is each and every one of them all, worldly and world-transcending. That very tathāgatagarbha, the source of the wondrous bright mind, is apart from ‘is’ and apart from ‘is not’; it is ‘is,’ and it is not ‘is.’ How can the knowing minds of the beings of the three existences of the world, and of the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas beyond the world, fathom the unsurpassed bodhi of the Tathāgata! How can one enter the knowledge and vision of the Buddha with the language of the world! It is like the qin, the se, the konghou, and the pipa: although they have wondrous sounds, without wondrous fingers they can never sound them forth. You and beings are also like this. The jeweled-awakening true mind is perfect and full in each; when I press my finger, the ocean-seal emits light; when you raise your mind for a moment, the toils of the dusts arise first; this is because you do not diligently seek the unsurpassed path of awakening, but love the Lesser Vehicle and are content with a little attainment.’

〔8 · Resolving Pūrṇa’s Doubt about the Cause of Falsity〕(0121b04)Pūrṇa said: ‘I and the Tathāgata are without duality, perfect and full in the jeweled-awakening, perfectly bright, true, wondrous, pure mind; but in the past I met with beginningless false thinking and long remained in the cycle of rebirth; now, though I have obtained the sagely vehicle, I have not yet reached the ultimate. The World-Honored One has perfectly extinguished all falsities, and only the wondrous true abides permanently. I venture to ask the Tathāgata: because of what do all beings have falsity, so that they themselves cover over the wondrous brightness and suffer this sinking and drowning?’ The Buddha said to Pūrṇa: ‘Although you have rid yourself of doubt, your remaining delusion is not yet exhausted. I will now ask you again with a matter present before the world: have you not heard of Yajñadatta in the city of Śrāvastī, who suddenly one morning looked at his face in a mirror, delighted that the head, eyebrows, and eyes in the mirror could be seen, yet angrily reproached his own head for not showing its face and eyes; taking it to be a mountain-demon, he ran about madly for no reason? What do you think? Because of what did this man run madly for no reason?’

〔8 · Resolving Pūrṇa’s Doubt about the Cause of Falsity〕(0121b14)Pūrṇa said: ‘This man’s mind was mad; there is no other reason.’ The Buddha said: ‘The wondrous awakening, bright and perfect, originally perfect, bright, and wondrous—since it is called falsity, how could it have a cause? If it had a cause, how could it be called falsity? It is only that all false thoughts in turn become causes of one another, accumulating confusion upon confusion, through kalpas as many as dust-motes; although the Buddha has brought it to light, still one cannot turn back. Such a cause of confusion exists of itself because of confusion. Recognize that confusion has no cause, and falsity has nothing to rely on; since there was never any arising, what is there to extinguish? One who has attained bodhi is like a man awake telling of things in a dream: however keen and bright his mind, by what causes and conditions could he take hold of a thing from the dream? How much more so, since there is originally no cause, and originally nothing at all. It is like Yajñadatta in that city: what causes and conditions could there be for him to fear for his head and run about of himself? Suddenly the madness stops, and the head was not got from outside; and even before the madness stopped, when was it ever lost? Pūrṇa! The nature of falsity is like this; where then is its cause? You need only not follow the discriminations of the three kinds of continuity—of the world, of action and result, and of living beings: when the three conditions are cut off, the three causes are not born, and the madness of the Yajñadatta in your mind stops of itself. When it stops, that is bodhi: the supremely pure bright mind originally pervades the dharma-realm and is not got from another. Why rely on toil and labor, exerting effort at the joints and sinews to cultivate and realize it?

〔8 · Resolving Pūrṇa’s Doubt about the Cause of Falsity〕(0121b28)‘It is like a man who has a wish-fulfilling jewel tied within his own garment and does not know it himself; impoverished, he wanders to other lands, begging for food and running about; though he is truly poor, the jewel has never been lost. Suddenly a wise man shows him the jewel; then whatever he wishes comes as his mind desires, and he gains great wealth, and only then does he realize that the spirit-jewel was not got from outside.’

〔9 · Resolving Ānanda’s Objection about Dependent Arising〕(0121c03)At once Ānanda, in the great assembly, bowed with his head at the Buddha’s feet, rose, and said to the Buddha: ‘The World-Honored One now says, “When the three conditions of the actions of killing, stealing, and lust are cut off, the three causes are not born; the madness of the Datta in the mind stops of itself, and when it stops, that is bodhi, not got from another.” This is plainly causes and conditions, clear and evident; why does the Tathāgata abruptly cast aside causes and conditions? It was from causes and conditions that my mind came to awakening. World-Honored One! This meaning is not only for us young śrāvakas still in training: now in this assembly Mahāmaudgalyāyana, together with Śāriputra, Subhūti, and the others, who were formerly old brahmins and came from among the outsiders, heard the Buddha speak of causes and conditions, aroused the resolve, awakened, and attained the state without outflows. Now you say that bodhi is not from causes and conditions; then the spontaneity taught by Gośālī and the others of Rājagṛha becomes the foremost meaning! I only ask that you bestow your great compassion and open up our confusion and stupefaction!’

〔9 · Resolving Ānanda’s Objection about Dependent Arising〕(0121c12)The Buddha said to Ānanda: ‘It is like Yajñadatta in the city: if the causes and conditions of his madness can be extinguished, then the nature that is not mad comes forth of itself. The principles of causes and conditions and of spontaneity are exhausted in this. Ānanda! Yajñadatta’s head is originally spontaneous—originally so of itself; there is nothing that is not spontaneous—so because of what causes and conditions did he fear for his head and run madly? If his spontaneous head went mad because of causes and conditions, why was it not also, spontaneously, lost because of causes and conditions? The original head was not lost; the madness and fear arose falsely; the head never changed at all—why rely on causes and conditions? If the original madness were spontaneous, there would originally be madness and fear; then before he went mad, where was the madness hidden? If the absence of madness were spontaneous, the head being originally without falsity, why did he run madly? If one awakens to the original head and recognizes the mad running, causes and conditions and spontaneity are both idle disputation. Therefore I say, “When the three conditions are cut off, that is the bodhi mind.” The bodhi mind arising and the arising-and-perishing mind perishing—this is still only arising and perishing; when perishing and arising are both exhausted, that is the effortless path. If there were spontaneity, then like this it would be making clear that the spontaneous mind arises and the arising-and-perishing mind perishes, and this too is arising and perishing; only what is without arising and perishing is called spontaneity. Just as in the world the various appearances mingled and combined into one body are called the nature of union, and what is not in union is called the nature of what is originally so. What is originally so is not so, and what is in union is not union; union and so-ness are both left behind, and leaving and union are both negated—only this phrase is called the dharma free of idle disputation.

〔9 · Resolving Ānanda’s Objection about Dependent Arising〕(0121c26)‘Bodhi and nirvāṇa are still far off; they are not what you can obtain by laborious cultivation and realization through kalpas. Even if you remembered and retained the pure, wondrous principles of the twelve divisions of the scriptures of the Tathāgatas of the ten directions, as many as the sands of the Ganges, it would only increase idle disputation. Although you discourse on causes and conditions and on spontaneity with decisive clarity, and people call you foremost in learning, with the perfuming of this learning accumulated over kalpas you could not escape the calamity of Mātaṅgī, but had to wait for my Buddha-crown divine spell. The fire of lust in Mātaṅgī’s mind ceased at once; she attained the fruit of anāgāmin and became in my Dharma a forest of vigor; the river of love dried up, and she enabled you to be freed. Therefore, Ānanda! although through kalpas you have remembered and retained the secret, wondrous adornment of the Tathāgata, it is not as good as cultivating action without outflows for a single day, far leaving behind the two sufferings of hatred and love in the world. Mātaṅgī was in the past originally a courtesan; by the power of the divine spell her desire of love was dissolved, and in the Dharma she is now named the bhikṣuṇī Prakṛti. She and Yaśodharā, the mother of Rāhula, together awakened to their past causes, knowing that through lifetimes they had suffered because of greed and love; because of a single thought of perfuming cultivation of goodness without outflows, one gained release from bondage, and one received the Buddha’s prediction. How can you still deceive yourself, still lingering in looking and listening!’

〔10 · Ānanda Understands and Asks for the Practice · The General Address and Consent to Expound〕(0122a10)Ānanda and all the great assembly, hearing the Buddha’s instruction and teaching, had their doubts and delusions dissolved; their minds awakened to true reality; body and mind were light and at ease, and they gained what they had never had! Again weeping with sorrow and shedding tears, he bowed with his head at the Buddha’s feet, knelt upright with joined palms, and said to the Buddha: ‘Unsurpassed, greatly compassionate, pure Jeweled King, you skillfully open my mind! You are able, by such various causes and conditions and expedient means, to lift up, encourage, and exhort, guiding all beings sunk in darkness out of the sea of suffering. World-Honored One! Although I have now received such a Dharma-voice and know that the tathāgatagarbha, the wondrous awakened bright mind, pervades the worlds of the ten directions, containing and nurturing the Tathāgata’s lands of the ten directions, the pure, jewel-adorned lands of the King of Wondrous Awakening; and although the Tathāgata has also rebuked much learning as without merit, not equal to cultivation; I am now like a traveler lodging on the road who suddenly receives from a heavenly king the gift of a splendid house: although he has obtained a great mansion, he must still enter by the gate. I only ask that the Tathāgata not abandon his great compassion, and show us in this assembly who are benighted and dull how to cast off the Lesser Vehicle and in the end obtain the road of the original resolve toward the Tathāgata’s nirvāṇa without remainder! Let those still in training know from where to gather in and subdue their past clinging to conditions, obtain dhāraṇī, and enter the knowledge and vision of the Buddha?’ Having said this, he cast his five limbs to the ground. The great assembly present, with one mind, waited for the Buddha’s compassionate intent.

〔10 · Ānanda Understands and Asks for the Practice · The General Address and Consent to Expound〕(0122a23)At that time the World-Honored One took pity on the pratyekabuddhas and śrāvakas in the assembly who were not yet at ease with regard to the bodhi mind, and, for the sake of beings who in the future, after the Buddha’s extinction, would arouse the bodhi mind in the age of the Dharma’s ending, opened up the wondrous path of practice of the unsurpassed vehicle. He proclaimed to Ānanda and all the great assembly: ‘You who have decisively aroused the bodhi mind and do not tire of the wondrous samādhi of the Buddha, the Tathāgata, should first make clear the two decisive meanings of arousing awakening in the initial mind.

〔11 · The Gate of Sameness and Difference of Cause and Result〕(0122a27)‘What are the two decisive meanings of the initial mind? Ānanda! The first meaning is this: if you wish to cast off the way of the śrāvaka, cultivate the bodhisattva vehicle, and enter the knowledge and vision of the Buddha, you should carefully contemplate whether the resolve at the stage of cause and the awakening at the stage of result are the same or different. Ānanda! If, at the stage of cause, one takes the arising-and-perishing mind as the root cause of cultivation and seeks the Buddha-vehicle’s neither arising nor perishing, there is no such principle.

〔11 · The Gate of Sameness and Difference of Cause and Result〕(0122b03)‘Because of this principle, you should illuminate this: all the dharmas that can be made in the container worlds return to change and perishing. Ānanda! Look at the dharmas that can be made in the world—which one does not decay? Yet one never hears of empty space rotting away. Why? Space is not something that can be made, and so from beginning to end it has no decay or perishing. Then in your body, what is solid is earth, what is moist is water, warm touch is fire, and movement is wind. Through these four bindings, your profoundly perfect, wondrous awakened bright mind is divided into seeing, into hearing, into feeling, and into discerning; from beginning to end, five layers pile up and form turbidity. What is turbidity? Ānanda! It is like clear water, pure and clean as it originally is; and that dust, earth, ash, sand, and the like are by nature obstructive; the natures of the two are so by their own law, and their natures do not follow each other. Someone in the world takes that earth and dust and throws it into pure water; the earth loses its obstructiveness, the water loses its purity, and its appearance becomes murky and disordered; this is named turbidity. Your five layers of turbidity are also like this.

〔11 · The Gate of Sameness and Difference of Cause and Result〕(0122b13)‘Ānanda! You see empty space pervading the realms of the ten directions, space and seeing undivided. There is space without substance, and seeing without awareness; the two weave together and are falsely formed; this is the first layer, named the turbidity of the kalpa. Your body now grasps the four elements as its substance; seeing, hearing, feeling, and knowing are blocked and made obstructive; water, fire, wind, and earth are revolved into awareness and knowing; they weave together and are falsely formed; this is the second layer, named the turbidity of views. Further, in your mind, remembering, recognizing, reciting, and practicing, the nature gives forth knowing and seeing and admits the appearance of the six dusts; apart from the dusts there are no appearances, and apart from awareness there is no nature; they weave together and are falsely formed; this is the third layer, named the turbidity of afflictions. Further, you arise and perish morning and evening without stopping; knowing and seeing constantly wish to remain in the world, while the turning of action constantly shifts you from land to land; they weave together and are falsely formed; this is the fourth layer, named the turbidity of living beings. Your seeing and hearing originally have no different natures; separated by the many dusts, they give rise without cause to difference; in nature they know each other, in function they oppose each other; sameness and difference lose their standard; they weave together and are falsely formed; this is the fifth layer, named the turbidity of life.

〔11 · The Gate of Sameness and Difference of Cause and Result〕(0122b24)‘Ānanda! If you now wish your seeing, hearing, feeling, and knowing to accord far off with the Tathāgata’s permanence, bliss, self, and purity, you should first choose and settle the root of death and birth, and accomplish it by relying on the perfect, profound nature that neither arises nor perishes. With the profound, revolve that false perishing and arising, subdue it and return to the original awakening, and obtain the original bright awakening’s nature without arising or perishing as the mind at the stage of cause; then perfectly accomplish the cultivation and realization at the stage of result. It is like clarifying turbid water: store it in a pure vessel, still and deep, unmoving; the sand and earth sink of themselves and the clear water appears before you; this is named first subduing the guest-dust afflictions. Removing the mud and leaving only pure water is named forever cutting off fundamental ignorance. When the bright appearance is essential and pure, no transformation or manifestation becomes affliction; all accord with the pure, wondrous virtues of nirvāṇa.

〔12 · The Gate of the Knotting and Untying of Faculties and Dusts〕(0122c03)‘The second meaning is this: if you are determined to arouse the bodhi mind, give rise to great valor in the bodhisattva vehicle, and decisively cast off all conditioned appearances, you should carefully examine the root of the afflictions: who makes, and who receives, this giving rise to action and moistening birth since beginningless time? Ānanda! In cultivating bodhi, if you do not carefully contemplate the root of the afflictions, you cannot know where the false faculties and dusts are inverted; when you do not even know the place, how can you subdue them and attain the Tathāgata’s position? Ānanda! Look at those in the world who untie knots: if they do not see where it is knotted, how will they know how to untie it? Yet one never hears of empty space being torn apart by you. Why? Space has no appearance or form; there is neither knotting nor untying. Then your present eye, ear, nose, and tongue, together with body and mind—these six are the thieves’ go-betweens, robbing the treasures of their own house; from this, since beginningless time, the world of living beings has given rise to bondage, and within the container world one cannot transcend it.

〔13 · Separately Showing the Superiority and Inferiority of the Faculties’ Functions〕(0122c12)‘Ānanda! What is called the world of living beings? ‘World’ is flowing passage, and ‘realm’ is direction and position. You should now know that east, west, south, north, southeast, southwest, northeast, northwest, above, and below are the realm, and past, future, and present are the world; the directions are ten, and the flows are three. All beings weave falsity into one another; within the body there is exchange and shifting, and world and realm involve each other. And of this nature of the realm, although the ten directions can be fixed and clearly distinguished, the world points only to east, west, south, and north; above and below have no fixed position, and the in-between has no fixed direction. The number four is necessarily clear, and involves the world; three fours and four threes, turning around, make twelve; flowing and changing in three layers—one, ten, hundred, thousand. Taking it all together from beginning to end, within the six faculties each has twelve hundred merits.

〔13 · Separately Showing the Superiority and Inferiority of the Faculties’ Functions〕(0122c20)‘Ānanda! Within this, determine further which are superior and which inferior. As for the eye’s seeing: dark behind and bright in front—in front, fully bright; behind, fully dark; looking sideways to left and right, only two-thirds; taking its whole operation together, its merits are not complete; among the three parts, it is said to have merit, but one part has no virtue; you should know that the eye has only eight hundred merits. As for the ear, it hears everywhere in the ten directions without omission: in movement it is as if near and as if far, in stillness it is without boundary; you should know that the ear-faculty is complete with twelve hundred merits. As for the nose’s smelling, it passes through the breath going out and coming in: there is going out and coming in, but it lacks the junction in between; examining the nose-faculty, of three parts one is lacking; you should know that the nose has only eight hundred merits. As for the tongue’s proclaiming, it exhausts all worldly and world-transcending wisdom: words have their portions, but principle has no end; you should know that the tongue-faculty is complete with twelve hundred merits. As for the body’s feeling of touch, it recognizes the adverse and the agreeable: when united it can feel, when separate it does not know; separation is only one part, union has both parts; examining the body-faculty, of three parts one is lacking; you should know that the body has only eight hundred merits. As for the mind, it silently contains all the worldly and world-transcending dharmas of the ten directions and the three times; whether sagely or ordinary, there is nothing it does not embrace, to their very limits; you should know that the mind-faculty is complete with twelve hundred merits.

〔14 · Directing the Choice of the Perfectly Penetrating Faculty for Cultivation and Realization〕(0123a05)‘Ānanda! If you now wish to go against the flow of desire of birth and death, turning back to trace the flow to its root, and reach what neither arises nor perishes, you should examine these six faculties of reception and use: which unite and which separate? which are deep and which shallow? which is perfectly penetrating and which not perfect? If you can here awaken to the faculty of perfect penetration, go against that beginningless current of action woven of falsity, and so follow perfect penetration, then compared with a faculty that is not perfect, the effect is as a day to a kalpa. I have now fully revealed the merits originally possessed by the six, profound, perfectly bright, and their numbers are thus. Choose carefully among them the one by which you can enter, and I will bring it to light for you and let you advance. The Tathāgatas of the ten directions cultivated through each of the eighteen realms and all attained perfect, unsurpassed bodhi, and among them there is no superior or inferior. It is only because you are low and inferior, and cannot yet attain within them the wisdom of perfect interfusion and freedom, that I proclaim it, so that you need only enter deeply by one gate; entering the one, without falsity, those six knowing faculties are at once purified.’

〔14 · Directing the Choice of the Perfectly Penetrating Faculty for Cultivation and Realization〕(0123a15)Ānanda said to the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! How does one go against the flow and enter deeply by one gate, so that the six faculties can be purified at once?’

〔14 · Directing the Choice of the Perfectly Penetrating Faculty for Cultivation and Realization〕(0123a17)The Buddha said to Ānanda: ‘You have now attained the fruit of srota-āpanna and have already extinguished the delusions of the world of beings of the three realms that are cut off by seeing; yet you still do not know the beginningless false habits accumulated life after life within the faculties—those habits can be cut off only by what is cut off by cultivation—how much less the divisions and number of arising, abiding, changing, and perishing within them? Now observe the six faculties before you: are they one or six? Ānanda! If you say they are one, why can the ear not see? Why can the eye not hear? Why can the head not walk? Why can the feet not speak? If these six faculties are decisively six, then as I now in this assembly proclaim to you the subtle and wondrous Dharma-gate, which of your six faculties receives it?’ Ānanda said: ‘I hear with my ears.’ The Buddha said: ‘Your ear hears by itself—what has that to do with your body and mouth? Your mouth comes to ask about the meaning, and your body rises in reverent acceptance. Therefore you should know: not one, yet in the end it becomes six; not six, yet in the end it becomes one. In the end it is not that your faculties are originally one or originally six. Ānanda! You should know that these faculties are neither one nor six; because of beginningless inversion and sinking, within the perfect profundity the meanings of one and six arise. You, a srota-āpanna, although you have attained the dissolving of the six, have not yet forgotten the one. It is like the great empty space mixed among many vessels: because the shapes of the vessels differ, it is named different spaces; remove the vessels and look at space, and space is said to be one. How could that great empty space become same or not same for you? How much less could it further be named one or not one? Then the six faculties of reception and use that you know are also like this.

〔15 · Expounding at Length the Origin of the Faculties’ Knots · Directly Showing the Gate of Entering the One〕(0123b03)‘Because of the two kinds of appearances, brightness and darkness, shaping each other, within the wondrous perfection, adhering to the profound, seeing arises; the essence of seeing reflects form, and knotting form, it forms the faculty; the faculty in its origin is called the pure four elements, and so it is named the substance of the eye, shaped like a grape cluster; the four dusts of the floating faculty flow out and rush toward form. Because of the two kinds of appearances, movement and stillness, striking each other, within the wondrous perfection, adhering to the profound, hearing arises; the essence of hearing reflects sound, and rolling up sound, it forms the faculty; the faculty in its origin is called the pure four elements, and so it is named the substance of the ear, shaped like a newly rolled leaf; the four dusts of the floating faculty flow out and rush toward sound. Because of the two kinds of appearances, openness and blockage, arising from each other, within the wondrous perfection, adhering to the profound, smelling arises; the essence of smelling reflects scent, and taking in scent, it forms the faculty; the faculty in its origin is called the pure four elements, and so it is named the substance of the nose, shaped like two hanging claws; the four dusts of the floating faculty flow out and rush toward scent. Because of the two kinds of appearances, blandness and change, mingling with each other, within the wondrous perfection, adhering to the profound, tasting arises; the essence of tasting reflects taste, and wringing taste, it forms the faculty; the faculty in its origin is called the pure four elements, and so it is named the substance of the tongue, shaped like a crescent moon just lying down; the four dusts of the floating faculty flow out and rush toward taste. Because of the two kinds of appearances, separation and union, rubbing each other, within the wondrous perfection, adhering to the profound, feeling arises; the essence of feeling reflects touch, and grasping touch, it forms the faculty; the faculty in its origin is called the pure four elements, and so it is named the substance of the body, shaped like the drumhead of a waist-drum; the four dusts of the floating faculty flow out and rush toward touch. Because of the two kinds of appearances, arising and perishing, continuing each other, within the wondrous perfection, adhering to the profound, knowing arises; the essence of knowing reflects dharmas, and surveying dharmas, it forms the faculty; the faculty in its origin is called the pure four elements, and so it is named the mind’s thinking, like seeing things in a dark room; the four dusts of the floating faculty flow out and rush toward dharmas.

〔15 · Expounding at Length the Origin of the Faculties’ Knots · Directly Showing the Gate of Entering the One〕(0123b20)‘Ānanda! These six faculties, from that awakened brightness, come to have the awakening of brightening brightness; losing that essential clarity, they adhere to falsity and give forth light. Therefore now, apart from darkness and apart from brightness, you have no substance of seeing; apart from movement and apart from stillness, there is originally no substance of hearing; without openness and without blockage, the nature of smelling does not arise; neither change nor blandness, tasting has nowhere to come forth; neither separation nor union, the feeling of touch is originally nonexistent; without perishing and without arising, where would clear knowing lodge! You need only not follow these twelve conditioned appearances—movement and stillness, union and separation, blandness and change, openness and blockage, arising and perishing, darkness and brightness; pull out any one faculty as it suits you, free it from adhesion and subdue it inwardly; subdued, it returns to the original truth and sends forth the radiance of the original brightness; when the radiant nature comes to light, the other five adhesions are pulled out at that very moment, in perfect and complete liberation; not by the knowing and seeing produced by the dusts before one, the brightness does not follow the faculty, but lodging in the faculty the brightness comes forth; from this the six faculties function for one another.

〔15 · Expounding at Length the Origin of the Faculties’ Knots · Directly Showing the Gate of Entering the One〕(0123b29)‘Ānanda! Do you not know that now in this assembly Aniruddha sees without eyes; the dragon Upananda hears without ears; the goddess of the Gaṅgā smells scents without a nose; Gavāṃpati knows taste with an unusual tongue; the spirit Śūnyatā has touch without a body—illumined within the Tathāgata’s light, it is made to appear for a moment, but being of the substance of wind, its body is originally nonexistent; and the śrāvakas who have attained quiescence through the samādhi of cessation, like Mahākāśyapa in this assembly, have long since extinguished the mind-faculty, yet know with perfect brightness, not by way of the mind’s thought. Ānanda! Now if your faculties are all perfectly pulled out, inwardly lustrous and giving forth light, then the floating dusts and all the changing appearances of the container world will be like ice melted by hot water, transformed in response to thought into unsurpassed knowing-awareness. Ānanda! It is like a person of the world who gathers his seeing in his eyes: if he suddenly closes his eyes, the appearance of darkness appears before him; the six faculties are dim, head and feet alike. That person feels around the outside of his body with his hands; although he does not see, he distinguishes head and feet one by one, and his knowing-awareness is the same. Seeing that depends on brightness becomes no seeing in the dark; what arises of itself without brightness can never be darkened by any appearance of darkness. When the faculties and dusts are dissolved, how could awakened brightness not become perfectly wondrous?’

〔16 · Separately Refuting the Doubt〕(0123c13)Ānanda said to the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! As the Buddha said, “The awakened mind at the stage of cause, seeking permanent abiding, must accord with the names at the stage of result.” World-Honored One! At the stage of result, bodhi, nirvāṇa, suchness, buddha-nature, the amala-consciousness, the empty tathāgatagarbha, and the great perfect mirror wisdom—these seven names, though their designations differ, are pure and perfect, their substance and nature firm and congealed, permanently abiding and indestructible like the Vajra King. If this seeing and hearing, apart from darkness and brightness, movement and stillness, openness and blockage, ultimately have no substance—just as the thinking mind, apart from the dusts before it, is originally nothing at all—how can one take what is ultimately annihilated as the cause of cultivation and wish to obtain the Tathāgata’s seven permanently abiding fruits? World-Honored One! If, apart from brightness and darkness, seeing is ultimately empty—just as when there are no dusts before it, thought perishes of itself—then as I go back and forth around it, searching subtly, there is originally no mind of mine and nothing belonging to my mind; with what shall I set up the cause and seek unsurpassed awakening? The Tathāgata earlier spoke of the profound, essential, perfect, and permanent, contradicting his truthful words, and in the end it becomes idle disputation; how is the Tathāgata said to be one who speaks the truth? I only ask that you bestow your great compassion and open my dullness and obstinacy!’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0123c25)The Buddha said to Ānanda: ‘You study much learning but have not yet exhausted the outflows; in your mind you know only the causes of inversion, but when true inversion appears before you, you truly cannot recognize it. Fearing that your sincere mind has not yet believed and submitted, I will now try taking up worldly matters of the dusts to remove your doubt.’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0123c27)At once the Tathāgata commanded Rāhula to strike the bell once, and asked Ānanda: ‘Do you hear now?’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0123c29)Ānanda and the great assembly all said: ‘I hear.’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0123c29)When the sound of the bell had stopped and there was no sound, the Buddha asked again: ‘Do you hear now?’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a01)Ānanda and the great assembly all said: ‘I do not hear.’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a01)At that time Rāhula struck once more, and the Buddha asked again: ‘Do you hear now?’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a02)Ānanda and the great assembly again said: ‘All hear.’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a03)The Buddha asked Ānanda: ‘What do you call hearing? What do you call not hearing?’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a03)Ānanda and the great assembly all said to the Buddha: ‘If the bell is struck, then I get to hear; when it has been struck long and the sound fades away, and sound and echo are both cut off, that is called not hearing.’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a05)The Tathāgata again commanded Rāhula to strike the bell, and asked Ānanda: ‘Is there sound now?’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a06)Ānanda and the great assembly all said: ‘There is sound.’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a06)After a short while the sound faded away, and the Buddha asked again: ‘Is there sound now?’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a07)Ānanda and the great assembly answered: ‘There is no sound.’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a07)After a moment Rāhula came again and struck the bell, and the Buddha asked again: ‘Is there sound now?’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a08)Ānanda and the great assembly all said: ‘There is sound.’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a09)The Buddha asked Ānanda: ‘What do you call there being sound? What do you call there being no sound?’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a09)Ānanda and the great assembly all said to the Buddha: ‘If the bell is struck, that is called there being sound; when it has been struck long and the sound fades away, and sound and echo are both cut off, that is called there being no sound.’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a11)The Buddha said to Ānanda and all the great assembly: ‘Why do you now speak in equivocation?’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a12)The great assembly and Ānanda at the same time asked the Buddha: ‘Why do you now call us equivocating?’

〔17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It〕(0124a13)The Buddha said: ‘When I ask you about hearing, you speak of hearing; when I ask you again about sound, you speak of sound. Only, about hearing and sound, your answers have no fixed standard; how is this not called equivocation?

〔18 · Refuting His View of Annihilation by the Nature of Hearing〕(0124a15)‘Ānanda! When the sound fades and there is no echo, you say there is no hearing. If there were truly no hearing, the nature of hearing would already have perished, the same as a withered tree; when the bell is struck again, how would you know it? Knowing there is and knowing there is not are of themselves the dust of sound sometimes being absent and sometimes present; how could that nature of hearing be present or absent for you? If hearing were truly absent, who would know that absence? Therefore, Ānanda! sound within hearing has of itself arising and perishing; it is not that because you hear sound arise and sound perish your nature of hearing is made present or absent. You are still inverted, mistaking sound for hearing; no wonder you are confused and take the permanent for the annihilated. In the end you should not say that apart from movement and stillness, blockage and opening, hearing has no nature.

〔18 · Refuting His View of Annihilation by the Nature of Hearing〕(0124a22)‘It is like a person sound asleep on his bed and pillow; while he sleeps, someone in his household pounds silk or hulls rice; in his dream that person hears the sound of pounding and hulling and takes it for something else—either the beating of a drum or the striking of a bell; while dreaming, he himself wonders why the bell makes the sound of wood and stone. Then suddenly he wakes and at once knows it is the sound of the pestle. He tells his household himself: “Just as I was dreaming, I mistook this sound of hulling rice for the sound of a drum.” Ānanda! In his dream does this person remember stillness and shaking, opening and closing, openness and blockage? Although his body sleeps, the nature of hearing is not darkened. Even if your body dissolves and perishes and the light of your life passes away, how could this nature be dissolved and destroyed for you? Because all beings, since beginningless time, have followed forms and sounds and flowed along pursuing thoughts, they have never awakened to the nature pure, wondrous, and permanent. Not following the permanent, they pursue all that arises and perishes; because of this, life after life, they flow on in defilement. If one casts aside arising and perishing and guards true permanence, the permanent light appears before one, and the dusts and faculties and the cognizing mind fall away at that very moment. The appearances of thought are dust, and the feelings of consciousness are defilement; when both are left far behind, then your dharma-eye at that very moment becomes clear and bright; how could it not become unsurpassed knowing-awareness?’

The closing title of the fascicle: ‘The Great Buddha-Crown Sūtra of the Myriad Practices, Śūraṅgama, Fascicle Four’.

義疏Exposition

一、這一卷在整部經裡的位置

卷第三末,七大一一說到「清淨本然周遍法界」,阿難與大眾悟入,說偈讚佛。卷第四換了問的人。富樓那彌多羅尼子起座,先說自己的處境:「世尊常推說法人中我為第一,今聞如來微妙法音,猶如聾人逾百步外聆於蚊蚋,本所不見,何況得聞?」說法第一的人,聽這一段法像聾子隔百步聽蚊子叫。他替會中已證無漏的人問,問的是前三卷留下來的兩個難處。第一個:「若復世間一切根、塵、陰、處、界等皆如來藏清淨本然,云何忽生山河大地諸有為相,次第遷流,終而復始?」既然一切本來清淨,山河大地從哪裡來?第二個:「若地性遍,云何容水?水性周遍,火則不生。」地水火風各各周遍法界,怎麼容得下彼此?

佛許他說,說這一說是為了誰:「令汝會中定性聲聞,及諸一切未得二空迴向上乘阿羅漢等,皆獲一乘寂滅場地、真阿練若正修行處。」定性的聲聞、未得二空而迴向上乘的阿羅漢,都要由此得一乘寂滅之地。佛的回答佔了這一卷的前半。先答第一問:清淨本然何以忽生——由「性覺必明,妄為明覺」一念,起世界、眾生、業果三種相續。次答第二問:地水火風何以俱遍——以虛空不拒諸相為喻,說如來藏「隨為色空,周遍法界」,而後以一長串「非」與「即」收到「離即、離非,是即、非即」。富樓那再問:妄從哪裡來?佛以演若達多答。阿難接著問:那因緣呢?佛說因緣、自然俱為戲論。後半轉到修行:阿難祈修,佛開二決定義——審因地發心,審煩惱根本——說五濁、六根功德、六根結成的由來、入一無妄之門,末後以擊鐘驗聞,說聞性不隨聲滅。

子璿把這一卷科為兩大段:破滿慈執相難性顯如來藏,釋慶喜難緣起。本書依子璿科判分為十八節:致請許宣一節,答性覺一節,三種相續三節,結答喻釋一節,答大性俱遍一節,釋妄因一節,釋阿難難緣起一節,阿難祈修一節,二決定義二節,六根功德一節,揀圓根一節,根結之由一節,阿難伸疑一節,擊鐘二節。科判是讀法的導引,卷的界限以經文自標的卷題為準。卷端仍標全題,題下仍夾注「一名中印度那蘭陀大道場經,於灌頂部錄出別行」,譯署「唐天竺沙門般剌蜜帝譯」,與前三卷同。

本書以『三種相續』為這一卷的題。這四字是經文自有的:「如是三種顛倒相續」「世間、業果、眾生、三種相續」。

二、性覺必明,妄為明覺

佛先把富樓那的話牒出來:「如汝所言『清淨本然,云何忽生山河大地?』汝常不聞如來宣說性覺妙明本覺明妙?」富樓那說常聞。佛問:「汝稱覺明,為復性明稱名為覺?為覺不明稱為明覺?」你說的覺明,是覺性本來就明、所以叫覺,還是覺本來不明、要加一個明上去才叫明覺?富樓那答:「若此不明名為覺者,則無所明。」如果不明也叫覺,那就沒有所明的東西了。他的意思是:覺要有所明,才算覺。

佛就在這一句上轉。「若無所明,則無明覺。有所非覺,無所非明,無明又非覺湛明性。」你說沒有所明就沒有明覺——可是一有所明,那就不是覺了;沒有所明,又不是你說的明;而不明,又不是覺的湛明之性。然後是這一卷最要緊的一句:「性覺必明,妄為明覺。」覺性本來就明;硬要去明它,那就是妄。「覺非所明,因明立所,所既妄立,生汝妄能」。覺不是被明的對象;因為要去明,就立了一個所明;所一立,相對的能就生出來了。

接下來是能所一分之後的推演。「無同異中熾然成異。異彼所異,因異立同,同異發明,因此復立無同無異。」本來無同無異,一下子成了異;對著異,又立了同;同異相顯,又立了無同無異。「如是擾亂相待生勞,勞久發塵自相渾濁,由是引起塵勞煩惱。」卷第三說「瞪發勞相」,這裡說「相待生勞」——勞是同一個字。

讀這一段,要看見佛沒有說無明從哪裡來。佛說的是:你以為覺必須有所明,這一「以為」本身就是明覺之妄。所以富樓那問「云何忽生」,佛不答一個時間、一個原因,佛答的是你現在怎麼在想。

三、三種相續

「起為世界,靜成虛空,虛空為同,世界為異。」擾亂而起的,是世界;靜的,是虛空。虛空是同,世界是異;「彼無同異真有為法」——那個無同無異,才是真正的有為法。

世界從這裡開始。「覺明、空昧相待成搖,故有風輪執持世界。」覺明與空昧相對而搖動,有風輪。「因空生搖,堅明立礙,彼金寶者明覺立堅,故有金輪保持國土。」有金輪。「堅覺寶成,搖明風出,風、金相摩故有火光為變化性」,有火。「寶明生潤,火光上蒸,故有水輪含十方界」,有水。然後水火交發,「濕為巨海,乾為洲潬」。所以大海中火光常起,洲潬中江河常注;水勢弱於火,結為高山,「是故山石擊則成炎,融則成水」;土勢弱於水,抽為草木,「是故林藪遇燒成土,因絞成水」。「交妄發生,遞相為種;以是因緣世界相續。」風、金、火、水,四樣東西從一念搖動出來,互相為種。

眾生從同一個咎起。「復次,富樓那,明妄非他,覺明為咎!」明之為妄沒有別的原因,就是那個要去明覺的一念。「所妄既立,明理不踰。以是因緣,聽不出聲,見不超色」。所一立,明就被所限住了:聽出不了聲,見超不過色。色香味觸六妄成就,見覺聞知由此分開。「同業相纏,合離成化,見明色發,明見想成。異見成憎,同想成愛,流愛為種,納想為胎。」於是「交遘發生,吸引同業,故有因緣生羯囉藍、遏蒱曇等」——受生的因緣從這裡起。胎卵濕化,「卵唯想生,胎因情有,濕以合感,化以離應」。「情、想、合、離更相變易,所有受業逐其飛沈,以是因緣眾生相續。」

業果從眾生的相待來。「想愛同結,愛不能離;則諸世間父母子孫相生不斷;是等則以欲貪為本。」「貪愛同滋,貪不能止,則諸世間卵、化、濕、胎,隨力強弱遞相吞食;是等則以殺貪為本。」「以人食羊,羊死為人,人死為羊,如是乃至十生之類,死死生生互來相噉,惡業俱生窮未來際;是等則以盜貪為本。」欲、殺、盜三貪。「汝負我命,我還汝債,以是因緣,經百千劫常在生死。汝愛我心,我憐汝色,以是因緣,經百千劫常在纏縛。唯殺、盜、婬三為根本,以是因緣業果相續。」

然後結:「如是三種顛倒相續,皆是覺明明了知性,因了發相,從妄見生。」三種相續,都是那個覺明要去了知的性,因了知而發出相來。富樓那問的「山河大地諸有為相,次第遷流」,到這裡答了:「因此虛妄,終而復始。」

四、迷無本,花於空滅

富樓那聽完,問了一個很自然的問題:「若此妙覺本妙覺明與如來心不增不減,無狀忽生山河大地諸有為相;如來今得妙空明覺,山河大地有為習漏何當復生?」如果本覺無端忽生山河大地,那麼如來已經證得妙覺,山河大地什麼時候會再生出來?——悟了之後,妄會不會再起?

佛用迷方喻。有人在一個聚落裡認南為北,這個迷是因迷而有,還是因悟而出?富樓那答得好:「迷本無根,云何因迷?悟非生迷,云何因悟?」迷沒有根,怎麼能從迷生出來?悟不生迷,怎麼能從悟生出來?佛再問:這個迷人正在迷時,忽然有悟的人指示他,他明白了——「此人縱迷,於此聚落更生迷不?」會不會再迷?「不也。世尊!」佛說:「十方如來,亦復如是。此迷無本,性畢竟空。昔本無迷,似有迷覺,覺迷迷滅,覺不生迷。」迷沒有本,本來就沒有迷,只是好像有一個迷覺;覺了迷,迷就滅,覺不會再生迷。

再舉翳人見空花。翳病若除,花於空滅。「忽有愚人,於彼空花所滅空地,待花更生」——這人是愚是慧?富樓那說:「空元無花,妄見生滅,見花滅空已是顛倒,勅令更出斯實狂癡」。空裡本來沒有花,妄見才有生滅;看見花在空中滅,已經是顛倒了;還要它再生出來,那是狂癡。佛說:你既然這麼懂,為什麼問「諸佛如來妙覺明空,何當更出山河大地?」然後兩個喻收:「如金鑛雜於精金,其金一純,更不成雜;如木成灰,不重為木」。

這一節答的是『悟後會不會再迷』。答法不是保證,是指出問題本身的顛倒:你把迷當成一樣曾經有過的東西,才會問它什麼時候回來。

五、虛空不拒諸相,離即離非

第二問:地水火風各各周遍,怎麼容得下彼此?佛的喻是虛空。「譬如虛空體非群相,而不拒彼諸相發揮。」虛空自己不是任何一相,卻不拒絕任何相在裡面發揮。「日照則明,雲屯則暗,風搖則動,霽澄則清,氣凝則濁,土積成霾,水澄成映。」這些相,是從日雲風霽那邊生的,還是空自己有的?若是日生的,那日照時十方世界都該成日色,「云何空中更見圓日?」若是空自己的明,空該自己照,「云何中宵雲霧之時,不生光耀?」所以「當知是明,非日、非空,不異空、日」。「觀相元妄,無可指陳,猶邀空花結為空菓,云何詰其相𣣋滅義?觀性元真,唯妙覺明,妙覺明心先非水、火;云何復問不相容者!」看相,相本來是妄,像要空花結果;看性,性本來是真,妙覺明心本來就不是水不是火,怎麼還問它們相不相容。

然後是一句總的話:「汝以空明則有空現,地、水、火、風各各發明,則各各現;若俱發明,則有俱現。」你以明照空就現空,照地水火風各各現,一起照就一起現。「云何俱現?」兩個人同看水中的日影,一個往東走一個往西走,各有一個日跟著走;「不應難言:『此日是一,云何各行?各日既雙,云何現一?』宛轉虛妄,無可憑據。」

再進一層,說到如來藏。「汝以色空相傾相奪於如來藏,而如來藏隨為色空,周遍法界,是故於中風動、空澄、日明、雲暗。眾生迷悶背覺合塵,故發塵勞有世間相。」眾生以色空互相傾奪,如來藏就隨順成了色空。「我以妙明不滅不生合如來藏,而如來藏唯妙覺明,圓照法界,是故於中一為無量、無量為一,小中現大、大中現小,不動道場遍十方界,身含十方無盡虛空,於一毛端現寶王剎,坐微塵裏轉大法輪。」同一個如來藏,背覺合塵就是世間相,滅塵合覺就是「一為無量、無量為一」。

接著是這一卷最長的一串句子。先是「非」:「如來藏本妙圓心,非心、非空,非地、非水、非風、非火;非眼、非耳、鼻、舌、身、意,非色、非聲、香、味、觸、法;非眼識界、如是乃至非意識界;非明、無明、明、無明盡,如是乃至非老、非死、非老死盡;非苦、非集、非滅、非道;非智、非得;非檀那、非尸羅、非毘梨耶、非羼提、非禪那、非鉢剌若、非波羅蜜多;如是乃至非怛闥阿竭,非阿羅訶、三耶三菩;非大涅槃,非常、非樂、非我、非淨,以是俱非世出世故。」七大、六根、六塵、十八界、十二因緣、四諦、六度、如來、涅槃四德——世間法、出世間法,一一說非。然後是「即」:同樣一串,一一說即,「以是即俱世出世故」。最後:「即如來藏妙明心元,離即、離非,是即、非即。」離開即,也離開非;是即,又不是即。

接著責:「如何世間三有眾生,及出世間聲聞、緣覺,以所知心測度如來無上菩提!用世語言入佛知見!」琴瑟箜篌琵琶雖有妙音,若無妙指終不能發。「寶覺真心各各圓滿,如我按指,海印發光;汝暫舉心,塵勞先起,由不勤求無上覺道,愛念小乘,得少為足。」

這一節是這一卷的中心。富樓那問地水火風怎麼相容,佛從虛空說到如來藏,說到俱非俱即,最後說到為什麼你會這樣問:以所知心測度,用世間語言去入佛知見。問題不在地水火風,在問的人舉心的那一念。

六、演若達多:狂歇即菩提,因緣自然俱戲論

富樓那再問一次,問得很誠懇:「我與如來寶覺圓明真妙淨心無二圓滿;而我昔遭無始妄想久在輪迴,今得聖乘猶未究竟;世尊諸妄一切圓滅,獨妙真常。敢問如來,一切眾生何因有妄,自蔽妙明,受此淪溺?」眾生為什麼有妄?

佛用演若達多。室羅城中有個人叫演若達多,早晨照鏡子,愛鏡子裡的頭眉目可見,「瞋責己頭不見面目,以為魑魅,無狀狂走」。他為什麼無故狂走?富樓那說:「是人心狂,更無他故。」佛說:「妙覺明圓、本圓明妙,既稱為妄,云何有因?若有所因,云何名妄?」既然叫作妄,怎麼會有因?若有因,就不叫妄了。「自諸妄想展轉相因,從迷積迷以歷塵劫;雖佛發明,猶不能返。如是迷因,因迷自有。識迷無因,妄無所依;尚無有生,欲何為滅?」認得迷沒有因,妄就無所依;妄本來沒有生,要滅什麼?「得菩提者,如寤時人、說夢中事;心縱精明,欲何因緣取夢中物?」

然後說回演若達多:「忽然狂歇,頭非外得。縱未歇狂,亦何遺失?」狂忽然歇了,頭不是從外面得回來的;就算狂還沒歇,頭也沒有丟。「妄性如是,因何為在?」接著是這一卷在修行上最直接的一句:「汝但不隨分別世間、業果、眾生、三種相續,三緣斷故,三因不生;則汝心中演若達多狂性自歇。歇即菩提,勝淨明心本周法界,不從人得;何藉劬勞肯綮修證?」只要不隨著分別三種相續,三緣一斷三因不生,狂性自歇;歇了就是菩提,不是從誰那裡得來。再舉衣中繫如意珠的喻:窮人衣中有珠,自己不知道,到他方乞食;「雖實貧窮,珠不曾失,忽有智者指示其珠,所願從心,致大饒富,方悟神珠非從外得。」

阿難聽到這裡,站起來問:佛說「殺、盜、婬業三緣斷故,三因不生;心中達多狂性自歇,歇即菩提,不從人得」——這明明是因緣,怎麼如來又頓棄因緣?「我從因緣心得開悟。」會中大目犍連、舍利弗、須菩提都是從老梵志聞佛因緣發心開悟;「今說菩提不從因緣,則王舍城拘舍梨等所說自然,成第一義!」若不是因緣,那外道的自然豈不成了第一義?

佛還是用演若達多答。「演若達多,狂性因緣,若得滅除,則不狂性自然而出。因緣、自然,理窮於是。」若說狂是因緣,不狂就是自然;因緣與自然,道理到此為止。然後把兩邊都推倒:「演若達多頭本自然,本自其然,無然非自,何因緣故怖頭狂走?若自然頭因緣故狂,何不自然因緣故失?本頭不失,狂怖妄出,曾無變易,何藉因緣?本狂自然,本有狂怖,未狂之際狂何所潛?不狂自然,頭本無妄,何為狂走?」頭若是自然,為什麼會因緣而狂?若因緣能讓它狂,為什麼不能讓它丟?狂若是自然本有,沒狂的時候狂藏在哪裡?不狂若是自然,頭本來沒有妄,為什麼狂走?「若悟本頭,識知狂走,因緣、自然俱為戲論。」

「是故我言『三緣斷故即菩提心』,菩提心生,生滅心滅。此但生滅,滅生俱盡,無功用道。」我說三緣斷就是菩提心,那是菩提心生、生滅心滅——這還是生滅;生滅都盡了,才是無功用道。「若有自然,如是則明自然心生,生滅心滅,此亦生滅;無生滅者名為自然。」若你立一個自然,那自然心生生滅心滅,也還是生滅;真正無生滅的才叫自然。世間雜和成一體的叫和合性,不和合的叫本然性;「本然非然,和合非合,合、然俱離,離、合俱非,此句方名無戲論法。」

然後責阿難。「菩提涅槃尚在遙遠,非汝歷劫辛勤修證,雖復憶持十方如來十二部經清淨妙理如恒河沙,秖益戲論。」你能說因緣自然說得決定明了,人稱多聞第一,「以此積劫多聞薰習,不能免離摩登伽難」。摩登伽宿為婬女,由神呪力銷其愛欲,今名性比丘尼,與羅睺羅母耶輸陀羅同悟宿因,對舉是直的:「汝雖歷劫憶持如來祕密妙嚴,不如一日修無漏業,遠離世間憎、愛二苦。」歷劫憶持,不如一日修無漏業。「一念薰修無漏善故,或得出纏,或蒙授記。如何自欺,尚留觀聽!」多聞的人聽到這裡,被問的是:你還在看、還在聽嗎?

七、二決定義:因地心與煩惱根本

阿難悔淚頂禮,說:「我今雖承如是法音,知如來藏妙覺明心遍十方界」,而「如來復責多聞無功,不逮修習。我今猶如旅泊之人,忽蒙天王賜以華屋。雖獲大宅,要因門入」。知道了如來藏遍十方界,像有人賜了一座大屋;可是要進去,得有門。他請佛示「本發心路」:「令有學者,從何攝伏疇昔攀緣,得陀羅尼,入佛知見?」

佛為會中於菩提心未自在的緣覺、聲聞、為當來末法眾生,宣示:「汝等決定發菩提心,於佛如來妙三摩提不生疲惓,應當先明發覺初心二決定義。」兩個先要決定的義。

第一義:「汝等若欲捐捨聲聞,修菩薩乘,入佛知見,應當審觀因地發心,與果地覺為同、為異?」你發心的因,和你要證的果,是同是異?「若於因地,以生滅心為本修因,而求佛乘不生不滅,無有是處。」用生滅心修因,求不生不滅的果,不可能。所以要看清世間可作之法「皆從變滅」——有什麼是不壞的?只有虛空沒聽說過爛壞,「空非可作,由是始終無壞滅故」。你身中堅相是地、潤濕是水、煖觸是火、動搖是風,「由此四纏,分汝湛圓妙覺明心為視、為聽、為覺、為察,從始入終,五疊渾濁」。什麼叫濁?清水本來清潔,塵土灰沙本來留礙,兩個各有自性;有人把土投進水,「土失留礙,水亡清潔,容貌汩然,名之為濁」。

五濁依次說。「汝見虛空遍十方界,空見不分。有空無體,有見無覺,相織妄成;是第一重名為劫濁。」空與見分不開,空沒有體,見沒有覺,交織成第一重。「汝身現摶四大為體,見、聞、覺、知壅令留礙,水、火、風、土旋令覺知,相織妄成;是第二重名為見濁。」四大把見聞覺知壅成留礙,見聞覺知又把四大旋成覺知,第二重。「又汝心中憶識誦習,性發知見,容現六塵,離塵無相,離覺無性,相織妄成;是第三重名煩惱濁。」「又汝朝夕生滅不停,知見每欲留於世間,業運每常遷於國土,相織妄成;是第四重名眾生濁。」想留,又被業遷。「汝等見聞元無異性,眾塵隔越,無狀異生,性中相知,用中相背,同異失準,相織妄成;是第五重名為命濁。」見聞本來一性,被塵隔開,性裡相知,用上相背。五重都是「相織妄成」。

因地心怎麼立?「汝今欲令見、聞、覺、知遠契如來常、樂、我、淨,應當先擇死生根本,依不生滅圓湛性成,以湛旋其虛妄滅生,伏還元覺,得元明覺無生滅性,為因地心;然後圓成果地修證。」依不生滅的圓湛性,以湛旋轉虛妄的生滅,回到元覺——以這個無生滅性為因地心。喻是澄濁水:「如澄濁水貯於淨器,靜深不動,沙土自沈,清水現前,名為初伏客塵煩惱。去泥純水,名為永斷根本無明。」沙土沈下,是初伏;把泥去掉只剩水,是永斷。

第二義:「汝等必欲發菩提心,於菩薩乘生大勇猛,決定棄捐諸有為相,應當審詳煩惱根本。此無始來發業潤生,誰作誰受?」要知道煩惱的根本在哪裡——是誰在造業、誰在受。「若不審觀煩惱根本,則不能知虛妄根塵何處顛倒?處尚不知,云何降伏取如來位?」喻是解結:世間解結的人,看不見結在哪裡,怎麼解?沒聽說虛空被人撕裂,「空無相形,無結、解故」。「則汝現前眼、耳、鼻、舌、及與身、心,六為賊媒,自劫家寶」。六根是賊的媒介,自己劫自己的家寶。

然後說眾生世界:「世為遷流,界為方位。」十方為界,三世為世;「方位有十,流數有三」。世間只目東西南北,上下無位,中無定方,「四數必明,與世相涉;三四、四三,宛轉十二;流變三疊,一、十、百、千。總括始終,六根之中,各各功德有千二百。」每一根本有一千二百功德。再論優劣:眼「後暗、前明,前方全明,後方全暗,左、右傍觀三分之二」,三分功一分無德,「當知眼唯八百功德」;耳「周聽十方無遺,動若邇遙,靜無邊際,當知耳根圓滿一千二百功德」;鼻有出有入「而闕中交」,八百;舌「言有方分,理無窮盡」,一千二百;身「合時能覺,離中不知,離一合雙」,八百;意「默容十方三世一切世間出世間法」,一千二百。耳、舌、意圓滿,眼、鼻、身不圓。

「汝今欲逆生死欲流,返窮流根至不生滅;當驗此等六受用根,誰合、誰離?誰深、誰淺?誰為圓通?誰不圓滿?若能於此悟圓通根,逆彼無始織妄業流,得循圓通;與不圓根日劫相倍。」在圓通的根上修,和在不圓的根上修,一日與一劫之別。佛沒有替阿難選,佛說「隨汝詳擇其可入者,吾當發明令汝增進」。十方如來於十八界一一修行皆得圓滿,本無優劣,「但汝下劣,未能於中圓自在慧;故我宣揚,令汝但於一門深入,入一無妄,彼六知根一時清淨」。

這一節的兩個決定義,一個看因,一個看根。因要是不生滅的,根要揀圓通的。前半卷說的如來藏、三種相續、歇即菩提,到這裡落到一個人怎麼起修。

八、根結之由,擊鐘驗聞

阿難問:怎樣逆流深入一門,能令六根一時清淨?佛先說他現在的位置:「汝今已得須陀洹果,已滅三界眾生世間見所斷惑;然猶未知根中積生無始虛習,彼習要因修所斷得」——見所斷的惑已滅,根中積生的無始虛習還在,那要修所斷。然後才問:你現前六根,是一是六?「若言一者,耳何不見?目何不聞?頭奚不履?足奚無語?」若是六,我現在說法,是哪一根在領受?阿難說:「我用耳聞。」佛說:「汝耳自聞,何關身、口?口來問義,身起欽承。」耳自己聽,為什麼口來問、身起立?「是故應知,非一終六,非六終一。」太虛空參合群器,器形不同就說空不同,去掉器看空就說空是一;「彼太虛空,云何為汝成同、不同?」

然後說六根怎麼結成。六段同構。「由明、暗等二種相形,於妙圓中粘湛發見,見精映色,結色成根;根元目為清淨四大,因名眼體,如蒲萄朵,浮根四塵流逸奔色。」明暗兩種相對,在妙圓中粘住湛性而發出見;見精映色,結色成根;根元是清淨四大,名為眼體,形如葡萄,浮根四塵流逸奔向色。耳「由動、靜等二種相擊」,如新卷葉;鼻「由通、塞等二種相發」,如雙垂爪;舌「由恬、變等二種相參」,如初偃月;身「由離、合等二種相摩」,如腰鼓顙;意「由生、滅等二種相續」,如幽室見。卷第三破六入時說每一入都在一對塵中間生起;這裡說的是同一件事的由來:「粘湛」二字——本來湛然的性,被一對塵粘住了,發出一個根。

「如是六根,由彼覺明有明明覺,失彼精了粘妄發光。」六根是那個覺明要去明的一念,失了精了,粘住妄而發光。所以離暗離明無見體,離動離靜無聽質,無通無塞嗅性不生,非變非恬嘗無所出,不離不合覺觸本無,無滅無生了知安寄。然後是入一之門:「汝但不循動靜、合離、恬變、通塞、生滅、暗明,如是十二諸有為相;隨拔一根,脫粘內伏,伏歸元真,發本明耀,耀性發明,諸餘五粘應拔圓脫,不由前塵所起知見。明不循根,寄根明發,由是六根互相為用。」不循十二相,隨便拔一根,脫粘內伏,回到元真;一根拔,餘五根一起脫。明不循根,寄根而發,六根就互相為用。

六根互用有例證。「阿那律陀無目而見;跋難陀龍無耳而聽;殑伽神女非鼻聞香;驕梵鉢提異舌知味;舜若多神無身有觸,如來光中映令暫現,既為風質,其體元無;諸滅盡定得寂聲聞,如此會中摩訶迦葉,久滅意根,圓明了知不因心念。」沒有眼能見,沒有耳能聽,沒有身有觸,滅了意根仍圓明了知。所以「汝諸根若圓拔已,內瑩發光;如是浮塵及器世間諸變化相,如湯銷氷,應念化成無上知覺」——六根圓拔,浮塵與器世間的變化相像熱湯化冰。再舉一個近身的例:人把見聚在眼上,急閉眼,暗相現前,六根黯然,頭足一樣;可是這人用手循身外繞,雖不見,頭足一摸就辨,「知覺是同」。「緣見因明,暗成無見;不明自發,則諸暗相永不能昏。」見若依明,暗就不見;若不依明而自發,暗就不能使它昏。「根塵既銷,云何覺明不成圓妙?」

阿難又疑。佛說因地覺心要與果位名目相應;果位中「菩提、涅槃、真如、佛性、菴摩羅識、空如來藏、大圓鏡智,是七種名稱謂雖別,清淨圓滿體性堅凝,如金剛王常住不壞」。可是「若此見、聽離於暗明、動靜、通塞,畢竟無體」——見聽離了塵就沒有體,「云何將此畢竟斷滅以為修因,欲獲如來七常住果?」拿一個離塵就斷滅的東西作因,求常住的果,豈不違背佛先前說的「湛精圓常」?

佛說:「汝學多聞,未盡諸漏,心中徒知顛倒所因,真倒現前實未能識。」你知道顛倒的道理,可是真的顛倒現在面前,你認不出來。於是用一樁俗事。「即時如來勅羅睺羅擊鍾一聲,問阿難言」:「汝今聞不?」阿難、大眾說聞。鐘聲歇了,佛再問:聞不?說不聞。再擊,再問,說聞。佛問:「汝云何聞?云何不聞?」答:「鍾聲若擊則我得聞;擊久聲銷,音響雙絕,則名無聞。」佛又令擊鐘,改問:「爾今聲不?」答有聲。聲銷,問:聲不?答無聲。再擊,答有聲。佛問:「汝云何聲?云何無聲?」答:「鍾聲若擊則名有聲;擊久聲銷,音響雙絕,則名無聲。」

佛說:「汝今云何自語矯亂?」大眾、阿難問:我怎麼矯亂了?佛說:「我問汝聞,汝則言聞;又問汝聲,汝則言聲。惟聞與聲報答無定,如是云何不名矯亂?」問聞,答聞;問聲,答聲——聞與聲,到底是一件事還是兩件事?「聲銷無響,汝說無聞;若實無聞,聞性已滅同于枯木,鍾聲更擊,汝云何知?」若聲一銷聞性就滅了,像枯木,鐘再響你怎麼知道?「知有、知無,自是聲塵或無、或有,豈彼聞性為汝有、無?聞實云無,誰知無者?」有無,是聲的有無,不是聞性的有無;你說「無聞」,是誰知道這個無?「是故阿難!聲於聞中自有生滅;非為汝聞聲生、聲滅,令汝聞性為有、為無。」聲在聞中自己生滅,不是聲生聲滅使你的聞性有或無。「汝尚顛倒,惑聲為聞,何怪昏迷,以常為斷?」把聲當成聞,所以把常當成斷。

末後是重睡人的喻。有人睡熟,家人在他睡時擣練、舂米,他夢中聽到舂擣聲,當作擊鼓撞鐘,夢裡還怪這鐘怎麼像木石響;醒了,才知道是杵聲,告家人說「我正夢時,惑此舂音將為鼓響」。「是人夢中,豈憶靜搖、開閉、通塞?其形雖寐,聞性不昏。」他睡著,聞性沒有睡。「縱汝形銷命光遷謝,此性云何為汝銷滅?」身體銷了,命光遷了,這個性為什麼會跟著滅?

卷末收在修行上:「以諸眾生從無始來,循諸色、聲逐念流轉,曾不開悟性淨妙常。不循所常,逐諸生滅,由是生生雜染流轉。若棄生滅,守於真常,常光現前,塵根、識心應時銷落。想相為塵,識情為垢,二俱遠離;則汝法眼應時清明,云何不成無上知覺?」卷第四到這裡止,卷尾題「大佛頂萬行首楞嚴經卷第四」。

這一卷從富樓那問「云何忽生」起,到阿難聽鐘止。前半說妄怎麼起、怎麼歇;後半說從哪一根起修。擊鐘這一段,把前面所說的拿到耳邊來驗:聲有生滅,聞性沒有。阿難先前問「云何將此畢竟斷滅以為修因」,答案不在佛的話裡,在鐘聲歇了之後他自己還聽得見那個靜。

承衍——真妄二覺,離即非即

上來是經文自身的義。此下另以注家之眼旁照——注非經,只是同一樁事,換一個位置來看。

富樓那所問,子璿說得重:「然此是法空門下疑難大節,最障修證」。他說富樓那「迹雖小聖,今經圓通述悟無非大途,故所陳難剛藏無異,學者至此請細觀之」。所問的分量與《圓覺經》金剛藏之問相同,所以勸學者細看。對佛所許宣的「勝義中真勝義性」,子璿說:「如來常依二諦說法,謂世俗諦、勝義諦。今所說者異乎常說,謂勝義勝義諦也。一真法界中道實相,無法不收、無法不遍,上聖下凡、情與非情皆成佛道,斯為極唱最後垂範也。」

「性覺必明,妄為明覺」一句,子璿釋為真妄二覺之結:「上句結真,下句結妄。性覺必有真明,故云性覺妙明、本覺明妙。妄謂明異於覺,是故汝言:若無所明則無明覺,以有所明方稱覺明故。解惑之見於焉可辨。」真覺本有妙明;妄是把明看成覺之外的另一樣東西,所以才會說「若無所明則無明覺」。釋「覺非所明,因明立所」:「真覺之體本有妙明,不逐緣生、非由境起,本來寂照,法界一相,故云覺非所明。因此真明,無明不了,妄執為所」。

對世界相續一段,子璿把四輪的次第收成幾句:「先從明昧搖動有風輪,風搖明立有金寶,金風相摩生火性,火蒸金潤有水生,水火相交,勢有勝劣,水勝火劣為海洲,火勝水劣為山」。

「離即、離非,是即、非即」,子璿以二門不二釋之:「此約二門不二,唯是一心。雙遮真俗,故曰離即離非;雙照真俗,故云是即非即。三諦一體,是故皆云即如來藏。」他又說這一段文字的次第:「初且以非遣相,次乃以即遣非,終帶名言,未極一真之旨。離即非即、無非不非,言語道斷,心行處滅,方顯一真法界如來藏心。」先以非遣相,再以即遣非,最後連即與非都離,才是言語道斷。這解釋了經文為什麼要先說一長串非、再說一長串即、最後說離即離非。

演若達多,子璿說:「演若達多,此云祠授。本頭與鏡俱喻性覺。照面喻強覺忽生,所相妄立。愛喻堅執不捨,認相為真。既喜有相,反惡無相,故嗔己頭不見面目。真無形相,不順妄情,便生驚怖。執相迷性,輪迴不息,故云狂走。魑魅,山澤之怪也。」頭與鏡都喻性覺,照面是強覺忽生,愛是認相為真,瞋責己頭是惡無相,狂走是輪迴不息。

二決定義,子璿以止觀二門釋之:「妙三摩提首楞嚴定,即真如觀。欲修此觀,先須方便,方便若成,真修可冀。故以止觀二門,名為發覺初心,即最初方便也。」

六根功德「三四四三宛轉十二,流變三疊」,子璿說「三變之義古今多解,各見其文不能具敘。今所解者,不加別法以變其數,只將今文過、現、未來進動算位,便成一千二百功德。」他不另加法,只以三世四方進動算位:「如第一位,三世、四方宛轉十二,便成一疊,算位即是一橫二竪已成過去。」

「見精映色,結色成根」,子璿釋:「見精,即妄覺也。能所相熏,互相交織,根結便成,故云結色成根。」「根元目為清淨四大」:「既覺明相雜,粘湛合成,由是名為清淨四大,即勝義根也。」

擊鐘一段,子璿釋「矯亂」:「汝今但執隨聲之聞,此聞既不離聲,只合是聲,不合名聞。又言是聲、又言是聞,既隨言印順,故成矯亂。」釋「豈彼聞性為汝有無」:「若實此聞隨聲而滅,則汝一身應如木石,再擊鍾時如何聞響?知有下五句對釋無生,有無之知自屬聲境,且不關聞,故云自是聲塵或有或無,聞性常然未曾起滅,故云豈彼聞性為汝有無。」

I. Where This Fascicle Stands in the Whole Sūtra

At the end of Fascicle Three the Buddha has said of each of the seven elements that it is “pure and originally so, pervading the dharma-realm”; Ānanda and the assembly enter into it and speak a verse in praise of the Buddha. Fascicle Four changes the questioner. Pūrṇa Maitrāyaṇīputra rises from his seat and first states his own position: “The World-Honored One has always put me first among those who preach the Dharma; now, hearing the Tathāgata’s subtle and wondrous Dharma-voice, I am like a deaf man straining to hear a mosquito from more than a hundred paces away—he never saw it in the first place, how much less could he hear it?” The man who is first among preachers hears this teaching the way a deaf man hears a mosquito a hundred paces off. He asks on behalf of those in the assembly who have already realized the state without outflows, and what he asks are the two difficulties the first three fascicles have left behind. The first: “If all the faculties, dusts, aggregates, bases, and realms of the world are the tathāgatagarbha, pure and originally so, how is it that mountains, rivers, and the great earth, all the conditioned appearances, suddenly arise, shifting and flowing in sequence, ending and beginning again?” If everything is originally pure, where do the mountains and rivers come from? The second: “If the nature of earth pervades everything, how can it admit water? If the nature of water pervades everywhere, fire could not arise.” Earth, water, fire, and wind each pervade the dharma-realm; how do they make room for one another?

The Buddha consents, and says for whom this teaching is given: “so that the fixed-nature śrāvakas in your assembly, and all the arhats who have not yet attained the two emptinesses yet turn toward the higher vehicle, may all obtain the ground of quiescence of the One Vehicle, the true araṇya, the place of right practice.” The śrāvakas of fixed nature, and the arhats who have not yet attained the two emptinesses yet turn toward the higher vehicle, are all to obtain by this the ground of quiescence of the One Vehicle. The Buddha’s answer takes up the first half of this fascicle. He answers the first question first: how pure and original nature suddenly gives rise—through the one thought in which “the nature-awakening is necessarily bright; falsely it is taken as a bright awakening,” the three kinds of continuity arise, of the world, of living beings, and of action and result. Then he answers the second: how earth, water, fire, and wind all pervade—using empty space, which refuses no appearance, as the simile, saying that the tathāgatagarbha “accordingly becomes form and emptiness, pervading the dharma-realm,” and then gathering a long string of ‘is not’ and ‘is’ into “apart from ‘is,’ apart from ‘is not’; it is ‘is,’ and it is not ‘is.’” Pūrṇa asks again: where does falsity come from? The Buddha answers with Yajñadatta. Ānanda then asks: what of causes and conditions? The Buddha says that causes and conditions and spontaneity are both idle disputation. The second half turns to practice: Ānanda asks for the practice, and the Buddha opens the two decisive meanings—examine the resolve at the stage of cause, examine the root of the afflictions—speaking of the five turbidities, the merits of the six faculties, the way the six faculties were knotted together, and the gate of entering the one without falsity; at the end he has a bell struck to test hearing, and says that the nature of hearing does not perish with the sound.

Zixuan outlines this fascicle in two great sections: refuting Pūrṇa’s difficulty, which clings to appearances against the nature, and so revealing the tathāgatagarbha; and resolving Ānanda’s objection about dependent arising. This edition follows Zixuan’s outline in eighteen sections: one for the request and the consent to expound; one for the answer about the nature-awakening; three for the three kinds of continuity; one for concluding the answer with similes; one for the answer about the elements all pervading; one for resolving the cause of falsity; one for resolving Ānanda’s objection about dependent arising; one for Ānanda’s request for the practice; two for the two decisive meanings; one for the merits of the six faculties; one for choosing the perfectly penetrating faculty; one for the origin of the faculties’ knots; one for Ānanda’s doubt; and two for the striking of the bell. The outline is a guide for reading; the boundary of the fascicle is set by the fascicle title the sūtra gives itself. The head of the fascicle still bears the full title, with the interlinear note “also called the Great Bodhimaṇḍa Sūtra of Nālandā in Central India, copied out from the Consecration Section to circulate separately,” and the translator’s line “Translated by the śramaṇa Pramiti of India, of the Tang,” the same as in the first three fascicles.

This edition takes ‘the three kinds of continuity’ as the title of this fascicle. The words are the sūtra’s own: “these three kinds of inverted continuity”; “the three kinds of continuity—the world, action and result, and living beings.”

II. The Nature-Awakening Is Necessarily Bright; Falsely It Is Taken as a Bright Awakening

The Buddha first repeats Pūrṇa’s words back to him: “As you say, ‘pure and originally so—how do mountains, rivers, and the great earth suddenly arise?’ Have you not constantly heard the Tathāgata proclaim that the nature-awakening is wondrously bright, and the original awakening is brightly wondrous?” Pūrṇa says he has constantly heard it. The Buddha asks: “You speak of ‘awakened brightness.’ Is it that the nature is bright, and so is called awakening? Or is it that awakening is not bright, and is called ‘bright awakening’ because brightness is added?” The awakened brightness you speak of—is the awakening-nature bright of itself, and therefore called awakening, or is the awakening not bright of itself, so that a brightness must be added before it can be called a bright awakening? Pūrṇa answers: “If what is not bright is called awakening, then there is nothing that is brightened.” If what is not bright is also called awakening, then there is nothing for it to brighten. His meaning is: awakening must have something it brightens before it counts as awakening.

The Buddha turns on exactly this sentence. “If there is nothing that is brightened, then there is no bright awakening. Where there is something brightened, that is not awakening; where there is nothing brightened, that is not brightness; and not-bright is not the profoundly bright nature of awakening either.” You say that without something brightened there is no bright awakening—but as soon as there is something brightened, that is no longer awakening; where there is nothing brightened, that is not the brightness you speak of; and what is not bright is not the profoundly bright nature of awakening. Then comes the most important sentence of the fascicle: “The nature-awakening is necessarily bright; falsely it is taken as a bright awakening.” The awakening-nature is bright of itself; to insist on brightening it is falsity. “Awakening is not something brightened; because of brightening, an object is set up; once the object is falsely set up, your false subject is born.” Awakening is not an object to be brightened; because one sets out to brighten it, an object-to-be-brightened is set up; once the object is set up, the subject that stands over against it is born.

What follows is the unfolding once subject and object have split. “In what is neither same nor different, difference blazes up. Over against that difference, sameness is set up because of difference; as sameness and difference show each other forth, from this neither-same-nor-different is set up again.” Originally there was neither sameness nor difference; all at once there is difference; over against difference, sameness is set up; sameness and difference show each other forth, and neither-same-nor-different is set up once more. “Thus the disturbance, each waiting on the other, gives rise to strain; strain long continued gives rise to dust, which muddies itself; from this arise the toils of the dusts and the afflictions.” Fascicle Three said “the strained appearance of staring”; here it says “each waiting on the other gives rise to strain”—the word for strain is the same.

In reading this passage one must see that the Buddha does not say where ignorance comes from. What the Buddha says is: you think awakening must have something it brightens, and this very ‘thinking’ is the falsity of the bright awakening. So when Pūrṇa asks “how does it suddenly arise,” the Buddha does not answer with a time or a cause; what the Buddha answers is how you are thinking right now.

III. The Three Kinds of Continuity

“Arising becomes the world; stillness becomes empty space. Empty space is sameness; the world is difference.” What arises out of the disturbance is the world; what is still is empty space. Empty space is sameness, the world is difference; “that which is neither same nor different is the truly conditioned dharma”—that neither-same-nor-different is the truly conditioned dharma.

The world begins here. “Awakened brightness and the dimness of space, waiting on each other, become shaking; so there is the wind-wheel holding up the world.” Awakened brightness and the dimness of space stand over against each other and shake; there is the wind-wheel. “Because of space, shaking arises; the hardening of brightness sets up obstruction; that metal treasure is the hardness set up by bright awakening; so there is the metal-wheel holding the lands.” There is the metal-wheel. “Hardened awakening becomes treasure; shaking brightness sends out wind; wind and metal rub against each other, so there is the light of fire as the nature of transformation”—there is fire. “The brightness of the treasure gives rise to moisture; the light of fire steams upward; so there is the water-wheel containing the realms of the ten directions”—there is water. Then water and fire act on each other: “the wet becomes the great ocean, the dry becomes continents and sandbanks.” So the light of fire constantly rises in the great ocean, and rivers constantly pour through the continents and sandbanks; where the force of water is weaker than fire, it binds into high mountains, “so stone from the mountains gives out flame when struck and becomes water when melted”; where the force of earth is weaker than water, it is drawn out into grass and trees, “so forests and thickets become earth when burned and give out water when wrung.” “Falsity crossing falsity gives rise to them; each in turn becomes the seed of the other; by these causes and conditions the world continues.” Wind, metal, fire, water—four things come out of one thought’s shaking, and each becomes the seed of the other.

Living beings arise from the same fault. “Furthermore, Pūrṇa, the falsity of brightening has no other source: the fault is awakened brightness!” The falsity of brightening has no other cause than that one thought of wanting to brighten awakening. “Once the false object is set up, the brightening cannot pass beyond its principle. By these causes and conditions, hearing does not go beyond sound, and seeing does not go past form.” Once the object is set up, the brightening is confined by the object: hearing cannot get past sound, seeing cannot get past form. The six falsities of form, scent, taste, and touch come into being, and seeing, awareness, hearing, and knowing are parted from this. “Those of the same action entangle one another; by union and separation, transformation comes about. Seeing brightness, form arises; brightened seeing, thought is formed. Different views become hatred; the same thoughts become love; flowing love becomes the seed; taking in thought becomes the embryo.” Then “coupling gives rise to them; those of the same action are drawn in; so by causes and conditions the kalala, the arbuda, and the rest are born”—the causes and conditions of taking birth begin here. Mother-born, egg-born, moisture-born, transformation-born—“egg-born arise only from thought; the mother-born exist because of feeling; moisture-born respond to union; transformation-born answer to separation.” “Feeling, thought, union, and separation change into one another; all who receive action follow them up and down; by these causes and conditions living beings continue.”

Action and result come from living beings’ standing over against one another. “Thought and love bind together; love cannot part; then in all the worlds fathers, mothers, children, and grandchildren beget one another without ceasing; these have the greed of desire as their root.” “Greed and love nourish each other; greed cannot stop; then in all the worlds the egg-born, transformation-born, moisture-born, and mother-born, according to the strength or weakness of their power, devour one another in turn; these have the greed of killing as their root.” “When men eat sheep, the sheep die and become men, the men die and become sheep; so on through the ten kinds of birth, dying and being born, they come to eat one another in turn; evil action is born along with them to the limit of the future; these have the greed of stealing as their root.” Desire, killing, stealing: three greeds. “You owe me a life; I repay you a debt; by these causes and conditions, through a hundred thousand kalpas they are constantly in birth and death. You love my heart; I pity your beauty; by these causes and conditions, through a hundred thousand kalpas they are constantly in bondage. Only killing, stealing, and lust, these three, are the root; by these causes and conditions, action and result continue.”

Then he concludes: “These three kinds of inverted continuity are all the nature of awakened brightness that would clearly know; because of knowing, appearances are sent forth; they arise from false seeing.” The three kinds of continuity are all that awakened brightness’s nature that would go and know; because of the knowing, appearances come forth. What Pūrṇa asked—“mountains, rivers, and the great earth, all the conditioned appearances, shifting and flowing in sequence”—is answered here: “because of this falsity, ending and beginning again.”

IV. Confusion Has No Root; the Flowers Vanish in the Sky

Having heard this, Pūrṇa asks a very natural question: “If this wondrous awakening, originally wondrous awakened brightness, neither increases nor decreases with the Tathāgata’s mind, and without cause it suddenly gives rise to mountains, rivers, and the great earth, all the conditioned appearances—then now that the Tathāgata has attained the wondrous, empty, bright awakening, when will the mountains, rivers, and the great earth, the conditioned habits and outflows, arise again?” If the original awakening gave rise to mountains, rivers, and the great earth for no reason, then now that the Tathāgata has realized wondrous awakening, when will mountains, rivers, and the great earth arise again?—after awakening, will falsity arise again or not?

The Buddha uses the simile of the man confused about direction. A man in a village takes south for north; does this confusion exist because of confusion, or does it come out of awakening? Pūrṇa answers well: “Confusion originally has no root; how could it be because of confusion? Awakening does not give birth to confusion; how could it be because of awakening?” Confusion has no root; how could it arise from confusion? Awakening does not give birth to confusion; how could it arise from awakening? The Buddha asks again: while this confused man is in his confusion, suddenly someone awakened points the way to him, and he understands—“even though this man was confused, would he become confused again in this village?” Would he be confused again? “No, World-Honored One!” The Buddha says: “The Tathāgatas of the ten directions are also like this. This confusion has no root; its nature is ultimately empty. Formerly there was originally no confusion; there seemed to be a confused awareness; when confusion is awakened to, confusion perishes; awakening does not give birth to confusion.” Confusion has no root; originally there was no confusion; there only seemed to be a confused awareness; once the confusion is awakened to, it perishes, and awakening will not give birth to confusion again.

Next he brings up the man with a cataract who sees flowers in the sky. If the cataract is removed, the flowers vanish in the sky. “Suppose a foolish man, at the place in the sky where those sky-flowers vanished, waits for the flowers to appear again”—is this man foolish or wise? Pūrṇa says: “The sky originally had no flowers; false seeing produced their arising and vanishing. To see the flowers vanish in the sky is already inverted; to command them to come out again is truly mad and foolish.” The sky never had flowers; only false seeing had them arise and vanish; to see the flowers vanish in the sky is already inverted; to want them to appear again is madness and folly. The Buddha says: since you understand this so well, why do you ask “when will the wondrous awakened bright emptiness of the Buddhas, the Tathāgatas, bring forth mountains, rivers, and the great earth again?” Then two similes close it: “as when gold ore is mixed with pure gold—once the gold is pure, it does not become mixed again; as when wood becomes ash, it does not become wood again.”

What this section answers is ‘whether one becomes confused again after awakening.’ The way it answers is not a guarantee but a pointing out of the inversion in the question itself: you take confusion to be something that once existed, and only so can you ask when it will come back.

V. Empty Space Refuses No Appearance; Apart from ‘Is,’ Apart from ‘Is Not’

The second question: earth, water, fire, and wind each pervade everywhere; how do they make room for one another? The Buddha’s simile is empty space. “It is like empty space, whose substance is not any of the many appearances, and yet which does not refuse those appearances their display.” Empty space itself is not any appearance, yet it does not refuse any appearance its display within it. “When the sun shines there is brightness; when clouds gather there is darkness; when the wind stirs there is movement; when the sky clears there is clarity; when the air condenses there is murk; when dust piles up there is haze; when water settles there is reflection.” Are these appearances born from the sun, the clouds, the wind, and the clearing, or does space have them of itself? If they were born from the sun, then when the sun shines the worlds of the ten directions should all turn the color of the sun—“why is a round sun still seen in the sky?” If the brightness were space’s own, then space should shine of itself—“why, at midnight when there are clouds and mist, does it not give off light?” Therefore “know that this brightness is neither the sun nor space, and yet is not different from space and the sun.” “Look at the appearances: they are originally false, and nothing can be pointed to; it is like begging sky-flowers to bear fruit of the void—how can you question the meaning of their mutually overcoming and destroying each other? Look at the nature: it is originally true, only the wondrous awakened brightness; the wondrous awakened bright mind was never water or fire in the first place; how can you still ask about their not admitting one another!” Looking at the appearances, the appearances are originally false, like asking sky-flowers to bear fruit; looking at the nature, the nature is originally true; the wondrous awakened bright mind was never water, never fire; how can you still ask whether they admit one another.

Then a sentence that sums it up: “When you brighten space, space appears; when earth, water, fire, and wind are each brought to light, each appears; if all are brought to light together, all appear together.” When you brighten space with your brightness, space appears; brighten earth, water, fire, and wind, each appears; brighten them together, they appear together. “How do they appear together?” Two men look together at the sun’s reflection in water; one walks east and one walks west, and each has a sun that follows him; “you should not object, saying, ‘This sun is one; how does it go with each? Each sun being two, how does it appear as one?’ Twisting and turning in falsity, there is nothing to rely on.”

He goes a step further, to the tathāgatagarbha. “You, with form and emptiness, push and snatch at one another within the tathāgatagarbha, and the tathāgatagarbha accordingly becomes form and emptiness, pervading the dharma-realm; so within it the wind moves, space is clear, the sun is bright, clouds are dark. Living beings, confused and troubled, turn from awakening to join the dusts, and so send forth the toils of the dusts and have the appearances of the world.” Living beings push and snatch with form and emptiness, and the tathāgatagarbha accordingly becomes form and emptiness. “I, with the wondrous brightness that neither perishes nor arises, join the tathāgatagarbha, and the tathāgatagarbha is only wondrous awakened brightness, perfectly illuminating the dharma-realm; so within it one is immeasurable and the immeasurable is one, the great appears in the small and the small in the great; the unmoving bodhimaṇḍa pervades the realms of the ten directions; the body contains the endless empty space of the ten directions; on the tip of a single hair the lands of the Jeweled Kings appear; seated within a mote of dust, one turns the great Dharma-wheel.” The same tathāgatagarbha: turning from awakening to join the dusts is the appearance of the world; extinguishing the dusts to join awakening is “one is immeasurable and the immeasurable is one.”

Next comes the longest string of sentences in the fascicle. First the ‘is not’: “The tathāgatagarbha, the originally wondrous perfect mind, is not mind, is not space, is not earth, is not water, is not wind, is not fire; is not eye, is not ear, nose, tongue, body, mind; is not form, is not sound, scent, taste, touch, dharmas; is not the realm of eye-consciousness, and so on to not the realm of mind-consciousness; is not brightness, ignorance, the end of brightness, the end of ignorance, and so on to not aging, not death, not the end of aging and death; is not suffering, is not accumulation, is not cessation, is not the path; is not wisdom, is not attainment; is not dāna, is not śīla, is not vīrya, is not kṣānti, is not dhyāna, is not prajñā, is not pāramitā; and so on to not tathāgata, not arhat, samyak-saṃbuddha; is not great nirvāṇa, is not permanence, is not bliss, is not self, is not purity—because all of these, worldly and beyond the world, it is not.” The seven elements, the six faculties, the six dusts, the eighteen realms, the twelve links, the four truths, the six pāramitās, the Tathāgata, the four virtues of nirvāṇa—worldly dharmas and dharmas beyond the world, one by one he says ‘is not.’ Then the ‘is’: the same string, one by one he says ‘is,’ “because all of these, worldly and beyond the world, it is.” Finally: “That is, the tathāgatagarbha, the source of the wondrous bright mind, apart from ‘is,’ apart from ‘is not’; it is ‘is,’ and it is not ‘is.’” Apart from ‘is,’ and apart from ‘is not’ as well; it is ‘is,’ and yet it is not ‘is.’

Then the reproach: “How can the living beings of the three existences in the world, and the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas beyond the world, use the mind of what they know to measure the Tathāgata’s unsurpassed bodhi, and use worldly language to enter the Buddha’s knowing and seeing!” The lute, the zither, the harp, and the pipa, though they hold wondrous sound, can never bring it forth without wondrous fingers. “The jeweled-awakening true mind is perfectly complete in each and every one; as when I press my finger, the ocean-seal sends forth light; when you raise your mind for a moment, the toils of the dusts arise first—because you do not diligently seek the unsurpassed path of awakening, but cherish the Lesser Vehicle and are content with a little.”

This section is the center of the fascicle. Pūrṇa asks how earth, water, fire, and wind admit one another; the Buddha goes from empty space to the tathāgatagarbha, to ‘is not’ and ‘is’ together, and at the end to why you ask this way at all: using the mind of what you know to measure, using worldly language to enter the Buddha’s knowing and seeing. The problem is not earth, water, fire, and wind; it is the one thought in which the questioner raises his mind.

VI. Yajñadatta: When the Madness Stops, That Is Bodhi; Causes and Conditions and Spontaneity Are Both Idle Disputation

Pūrṇa asks once more, and asks very sincerely: “I and the Tathāgata are perfectly complete without distinction in the jeweled-awakening, perfectly bright, truly wondrous pure mind; yet I formerly met with beginningless false thought and have long been in the wheel of rebirth, and now, having attained the holy vehicle, I am still not at the end; the World-Honored One has perfectly extinguished every falsity and is alone wondrous, true, and permanent. I venture to ask the Tathāgata: by what cause do all living beings have falsity, covering over their own wondrous brightness and suffering this drowning?” Why do living beings have falsity?

The Buddha uses Yajñadatta. In the city of Śrāvastī there was a man named Yajñadatta who, looking into a mirror one morning, loved the head in the mirror because its eyebrows and eyes could be seen, “and angrily reproached his own head for not showing its face; taking it to be a mountain-demon, he ran about madly for no reason.” Why did he run about madly for no reason? Pūrṇa says: “This man’s mind was mad; there is no other reason.” The Buddha says: “The wondrous awakening is bright and perfect, originally perfect, bright, and wondrous. Since it is called falsity, how could it have a cause? If it had a cause, how could it be called falsity?” Since it is called falsity, how could it have a cause? If it had a cause, it would not be called falsity. “From false thoughts turning upon one another as cause, piling confusion on confusion through kalpas as many as dust-motes, even when the Buddha brings it to light, they still cannot turn back. Such a cause of confusion exists of itself because of confusion. Know that confusion has no cause, and falsity has nothing to rest on; it never even arose—what would you extinguish?” Recognize that confusion has no cause, and falsity has nothing to rest on; falsity never arose in the first place—what is there to extinguish? “One who has attained bodhi is like a man awake telling of things in a dream; however keen and bright his mind, by what causes and conditions could he take hold of a thing from the dream?”

Then he returns to Yajñadatta: “Suddenly the madness stops; the head was not got from outside. And even before the madness stopped, what was lost?” The madness suddenly stops; the head is not got back from outside; and even while the madness had not yet stopped, the head was never lost. “The nature of falsity is like this; by what could it exist?” Then comes the most direct sentence of the fascicle for practice: “You need only not follow the discriminations of the three kinds of continuity—the world, action and result, and living beings; because the three conditions are cut off, the three causes do not arise; then the mad nature of the Yajñadatta in your mind stops of itself. When it stops, that is bodhi: the supreme, pure, bright mind originally pervades the dharma-realm and is not got from anyone else—why should you toil over the joints and sinews to cultivate and realize it?” Only do not follow the discriminations of the three kinds of continuity; when the three conditions are cut off and the three causes do not arise, the mad nature stops of itself; when it stops, that is bodhi, not obtained from anyone. Then he brings up the simile of the wish-fulfilling jewel tied in the clothing: a poor man has a jewel in his clothes and does not know it himself, and goes begging in other lands; “though truly poor, he never lost the jewel; suddenly a wise man shows him the jewel, and his wishes are fulfilled, and he becomes very rich, and only then realizes that the divine jewel was not got from outside.”

Hearing this, Ānanda rises and asks: the Buddha has said “because the three conditions of killing, stealing, and lust are cut off, the three causes do not arise; the mad nature of the Yajñadatta in your mind stops of itself; when it stops, that is bodhi, not got from anyone else”—this is plainly causes and conditions; how is it that the Tathāgata now abruptly casts causes and conditions aside? “It was from causes and conditions that my mind came to awakening.” In the assembly, Mahāmaudgalyāyana, Śāriputra, and Subhūti were all formerly old brahmins who came from among the outsiders, heard the Buddha speak of causes and conditions, and their minds awakened; “now you say that bodhi is not from causes and conditions; then the spontaneity taught by Gośālī and the others of Rājagṛha becomes the foremost meaning!” If it is not causes and conditions, does not the spontaneity of the non-Buddhists become the foremost meaning?

The Buddha still answers with Yajñadatta. “Yajñadatta’s mad nature—if its causes and conditions could be removed, then the nature that is not mad would come out spontaneously. Causes and conditions, spontaneity: the reasoning ends here.” If the madness is causes and conditions, then not-madness is spontaneity; causes and conditions and spontaneity—the reasoning goes this far and no further. Then he knocks down both sides: “Yajñadatta’s head was originally spontaneous; originally it was so of itself, and there was never a time when it was not so of itself; by what causes and conditions did he fear for his head and run about madly? If the head is spontaneous and he went mad because of causes and conditions, why did he not spontaneously lose it because of causes and conditions? The original head was not lost; the mad fear came forth falsely; there was never any change—what need of causes and conditions? If the madness were originally spontaneous, the mad fear originally existing, then before he went mad, where was the madness hidden? If not-being-mad is spontaneous, and the head was originally without falsity, why did he run about madly?” If the head is spontaneous, why would it go mad because of causes and conditions? If causes and conditions could make it mad, why could they not make it lost? If the madness is spontaneous and originally there, where was it hidden before he went mad? If not-being-mad is spontaneous, and the head originally had no falsity, why did he run about madly? “If one awakens to the original head and recognizes the mad running, then causes and conditions and spontaneity are both idle disputation.”

“Therefore I say, ‘When the three conditions are cut off, that is the mind of bodhi.’ The mind of bodhi arises; the arising-and-perishing mind perishes. This is still only arising and perishing; when perishing and arising are both exhausted, that is the path without effort.” I say that cutting off the three conditions is the mind of bodhi, and that is the mind of bodhi arising and the arising-and-perishing mind perishing—this is still arising and perishing; only when arising and perishing are both exhausted is it the path without effort. “If there is spontaneity, then clearly the spontaneous mind arises and the arising-and-perishing mind perishes; this too is arising and perishing; what has no arising and perishing is called spontaneous.” If you set up a spontaneity, then the spontaneous mind arising and the arising-and-perishing mind perishing is still arising and perishing; only what truly has no arising and perishing is called spontaneous. In the world, what is mixed and blended into one body is called the nature of union; what is not united is called the nature of what is originally so; “originally-so is not so; union is not union; union and so-ness both left behind, leaving-behind and union both negated—this sentence alone is called the dharma free of idle disputation.”

Then he reproaches Ānanda. “Bodhi and nirvāṇa are still far away; it is not through your toiling through kalpas to cultivate and realize them; even if you remember and hold the pure and wondrous principles of the twelve divisions of the scriptures of the Tathāgatas of the ten directions, as many as the sands of the Ganges, it only adds to idle disputation.” You can speak of causes and conditions and spontaneity with decisive clarity, and people call you first in learning, yet “with this perfuming of much learning through accumulated kalpas, you could not escape the trouble with Mātaṅgī.” Mātaṅgī was formerly a prostitute; by the power of the divine spell her lust was extinguished; she is now the bhikṣuṇī Prakṛti, and together with Rāhula’s mother Yaśodharā she awakened to the causes of her past lives; The contrast is set out directly: “Though you remember and hold the Tathāgata’s secret and wondrous adornments through kalpas, it is not equal to a single day of cultivating action without outflows, leaving far behind the two sufferings of the world, hatred and love.” Remembering through kalpas is not equal to one day of cultivating action without outflows. “Because of a single thought’s perfuming cultivation of the good without outflows, the one was freed from bondage and the other received the prediction. How can you deceive yourself and still linger in watching and listening!” The man of much learning, hearing this, is asked: are you still watching, still listening?

VII. The Two Decisive Meanings: The Mind at the Stage of Cause and the Root of the Afflictions

Ānanda, in tears of regret, bows his head and says: “Now, although I have received such a Dharma-voice and know that the tathāgatagarbha, the wondrous awakened bright mind, pervades the realms of the ten directions,” yet “the Tathāgata again rebukes my much learning as of no use, not equal to cultivation. Now I am like a traveler lodging on the road who is suddenly given a splendid house by a heavenly king. Though he has gained the great mansion, he must enter it by the door.” He knows now that the tathāgatagarbha pervades the ten directions, as if someone had been given a great house; but to enter it, there must be a door. He asks the Buddha to show “the original road of the resolve”: “so that those still learning may know from where to subdue their former clinging to conditions, obtain the dhāraṇī, and enter the Buddha’s knowing and seeing.”

The Buddha, for the pratyekabuddhas and śrāvakas in the assembly who are not yet at ease in the mind of bodhi, and for the living beings of the Dharma-ending age to come, proclaims: “You who have decisively resolved on the mind of bodhi and do not weary of the Buddha Tathāgata’s wondrous samādhi should first understand the two decisive meanings of the first resolve to awaken.” Two meanings that must first be decided.

The first meaning: “If you wish to abandon the śrāvaka path and cultivate the bodhisattva vehicle, entering the Buddha’s knowing and seeing, you should examine carefully whether the resolve at the stage of cause and the awakening at the stage of result are the same or different.” Is the cause you set out from the same as the result you would realize, or different? “If, at the stage of cause, you take the arising-and-perishing mind as the basis of your cultivation and seek the Buddha-vehicle that neither arises nor perishes, there is no such thing.” To cultivate from an arising-and-perishing mind and seek a result that neither arises nor perishes is impossible. So one must see clearly that the made things of the world “all pass away in change”—what is it that does not decay? Only of empty space has one never heard that it rots and decays, “space cannot be made; therefore from beginning to end it never decays or perishes.” In your body, the hard is earth, the moist is water, the warm is fire, the moving is wind; “by these four bindings your profound, perfect, wondrous awakened bright mind is divided into seeing, hearing, awareness, and examining; from beginning to end, five layers of turbidity.” What is turbidity? Clear water is originally clean; dust, earth, ash, and sand are originally obstructive; each has its own nature; someone throws earth into the water, and “the earth loses its obstruction, the water loses its cleanness, the appearance becomes murky, and that is called turbidity.”

The five turbidities are told in order. “You see empty space pervading the realms of the ten directions; space and seeing are not parted. There is space but no substance; there is seeing but no awareness; woven together, falsely they come to be; this is the first layer, called the turbidity of the kalpa.” Space and seeing cannot be parted; space has no substance, seeing has no awareness; woven together they form the first layer. “Your body now gathers the four elements as its substance; seeing, hearing, awareness, and knowing are blocked and made obstructive; water, fire, wind, and earth are turned about and made to be aware and to know; woven together, falsely they come to be; this is the second layer, called the turbidity of views.” The four elements block seeing, hearing, awareness, and knowing into obstruction, and seeing, hearing, awareness, and knowing turn the four elements into awareness and knowing: the second layer. “Again, in your mind, memory, recognition, recitation, and habit—the nature sends forth knowing and seeing, its appearance shows forth the six dusts; apart from the dusts there is no appearance, apart from awareness there is no nature; woven together, falsely they come to be; this is the third layer, called the turbidity of afflictions.” “Again, from morning to night you arise and perish without stopping; your knowing and seeing always wish to remain in the world; the movement of action always shifts you to other lands; woven together, falsely they come to be; this is the fourth layer, called the turbidity of living beings.” Wanting to stay, yet shifted by action. “Your seeing and hearing are originally of no different nature; the many dusts divide them, and for no reason difference arises; in the nature they know each other, in function they turn their backs on each other; sameness and difference lose their standard; woven together, falsely they come to be; this is the fifth layer, called the turbidity of life.” Seeing and hearing are originally one nature, parted by the dusts; in the nature they know each other, in function they turn away from each other. All five layers are “woven together, falsely they come to be.”

How is the mind at the stage of cause established? “Now, if you wish to have seeing, hearing, awareness, and knowing accord from afar with the Tathāgata’s permanence, bliss, self, and purity, you should first choose the root of death and birth, and relying on the perfectly profound nature that neither arises nor perishes, with the profound turn about its false perishing and arising, subdue them and return to the original awakening, and obtain the original bright awakening’s nature that neither arises nor perishes as the mind at the stage of cause; and then perfectly accomplish the cultivation and realization of the stage of result.” Relying on the perfectly profound nature that neither arises nor perishes, with the profound turn about the false arising and perishing, and return to the original awakening—take this nature that neither arises nor perishes as the mind at the stage of cause. The simile is settling turbid water: “as when turbid water is stored in a clean vessel; still, deep, and unmoving, the sand and earth settle of themselves, and clear water comes before you; this is called the first subduing of the guest-dust afflictions. Removing the mud and leaving pure water is called permanently cutting off fundamental ignorance.” The sand and earth settling is the first subduing; removing the mud and leaving only water is the permanent cutting off.

The second meaning: “If you must resolve on the mind of bodhi and bring forth great courage in the bodhisattva vehicle, decisively abandoning all conditioned appearances, you should examine in detail the root of the afflictions. From beginningless time, giving rise to action and moistening birth—who does it, and who receives it?” One must know where the root of the afflictions lies—who it is that does the action and who it is that receives. “If you do not examine the root of the afflictions, you cannot know where the false faculties and dusts are inverted. Not knowing even the place, how can you subdue them and take the Tathāgata’s position?” The simile is untying knots: if one who unties knots in the world cannot see where the knot is, how can he untie it? One has never heard of empty space being torn apart by anyone, “space has no shape or form, so there is no knotting or untying.” “Then your present eyes, ears, nose, tongue, and body and mind—the six are the thieves’ go-betweens, robbing your own house of its treasure.” The six faculties are the go-betweens of the thieves, robbing one’s own house of its own treasure.

Then he speaks of the world of living beings: “‘World’ is flowing passage; ‘realm’ is direction and position.” The ten directions are the realm, the three times are the world; “directions and positions are ten; the numbers of the flow are three.” The world names only east, west, south, and north; above and below have no position, and the center has no fixed direction; “the four numbers are clearly settled and interlock with the world; three fours and four threes, turning about, make twelve; the flow changes in three layers—one, ten, a hundred, a thousand. Taking in beginning and end, within the six faculties each has twelve hundred merits.” Each faculty originally has twelve hundred merits. Then he judges their superiority and inferiority: the eye “is dark behind and bright in front; the front is wholly bright, the back wholly dark, and looking to left and right sideways it takes in two-thirds,” three parts of merit and one part without, “know that the eye has only eight hundred merits”; the ear “hears all around the ten directions without missing anything; in movement it seems near or far, in stillness it has no bounds; know that the ear faculty is perfectly complete with twelve hundred merits”; the nose has out-breath and in-breath “but lacks the meeting in between,” eight hundred; the tongue, “in speech there is a limit of direction, in principle there is no end,” twelve hundred; the body, “in contact it can be aware, in separation it does not know; separation is one and contact is two,” eight hundred; the mind “silently contains all worldly and beyond-worldly dharmas of the ten directions and the three times,” twelve hundred. Ear, tongue, and mind are complete; eye, nose, and body are not.

“Now, if you wish to go against the flow of birth and death and desire, and turning back to search out the root of the flow, reach what neither arises nor perishes, you should test these six faculties of reception and use: which is in contact, which apart? Which deep, which shallow? Which is perfectly penetrating? Which is not perfectly complete? If in this you can awaken to the perfectly penetrating faculty, going against that beginningless woven flow of false action and following perfect penetration, then compared with a faculty that is not perfectly complete, the difference is as a day to a kalpa.” To cultivate on a perfectly penetrating faculty and to cultivate on one that is not: the difference between a day and a kalpa. The Buddha does not choose for Ānanda; he says “choose carefully for yourself which can be entered, and I shall bring it to light so that you advance.” The Tathāgatas of the ten directions, cultivating on each one of the eighteen realms, all attain perfect completion; there is originally no superior or inferior; “but you are inferior and cannot yet attain the wisdom of perfect ease among them; so I proclaim and have you enter deeply by one gate only; entering the one, without falsity, those six knowing faculties are at once pure.”

The two decisive meanings of this section: one looks at the cause, one looks at the faculty. The cause must be one that neither arises nor perishes; the faculty must be chosen for perfect penetration. The tathāgatagarbha of the first half of the fascicle, the three kinds of continuity, when-it-stops-that-is-bodhi—here they come down to how one person begins to practice.

VIII. The Origin of the Faculties’ Knots; Striking the Bell to Test Hearing

Ānanda asks: how can one go against the flow and enter deeply by one gate so that the six faculties are at once pure? The Buddha first tells him where he stands: “You have now attained the fruit of the srota-āpanna and have extinguished the confusions cut off by seeing among living beings of the three realms; yet you do not know the beginningless false habits accumulated in the faculties, and those habits must be cut off by cultivation”—the confusions cut off by seeing are extinguished, the beginningless false habits accumulated in the faculties remain, and those are for cultivation to cut off. Only then does he ask: your six faculties before you now—are they one or six? “If you say one, why does the ear not see? Why does the eye not hear? Why does the head not walk? Why do the feet not speak?” If six, then as I now preach the Dharma, which faculty receives it? Ānanda says: “I hear with my ears.” The Buddha says: “Your ear hears of itself; what has that to do with body and mouth? The mouth comes to ask the meaning; the body rises in reverence.” The ear hears of itself; why does the mouth come to ask and the body rise? “Therefore know: not one, yet in the end six; not six, yet in the end one.” The great empty space is mixed with the many vessels; because the vessels differ in shape, one says the spaces differ; take away the vessels and look at the space, and one says the space is one; “that great empty space—how could it become same or not-same for you?”

Then he tells how the six faculties were knotted. Six passages of the same build. “Because of the two kinds of appearance, bright and dark, showing each other forth, within the wondrous perfect, adhering to the profound, seeing is sent forth; the essence of seeing reflects form; form is knotted into the faculty; the faculty’s origin is called the pure four elements, and so it is named the eye-substance, like a cluster of grapes; the floating faculty, four dusts, flows out and runs after form.” Bright and dark, two appearances standing over against each other, adhere to the profound nature within the wondrous perfect and send forth seeing; the essence of seeing reflects form, and form is knotted into the faculty; the faculty’s origin is the pure four elements, named the eye-substance, shaped like a cluster of grapes; the floating faculty of four dusts flows out toward form. The ear, “because of the two kinds, moving and still, striking each other,” like a newly curled leaf; the nose, “because of the two kinds, open and blocked, giving rise to each other,” like two hanging claws; the tongue, “because of the two kinds, bland and changing, mingling with each other,” like a new crescent moon; the body, “because of the two kinds, separation and contact, rubbing against each other,” like the drumhead of a waist-drum; the mind, “because of the two kinds, arising and perishing, continuing each other,” like seeing in a dark room. When Fascicle Three refuted the six entrances, it said that each entrance arises between a pair of dusts; what is said here is the origin of the same thing: the two words “adhering to the profound”—the nature that was originally profound and still, adhered to by a pair of dusts, sends forth a faculty.

“These six faculties, because that awakened brightness has a brightening of the bright awakening, lose that essential clarity and, adhering to falsity, send forth light.” The six faculties are that one thought in which awakened brightness would go and brighten; losing the essential clarity, adhering to falsity, they send forth light. So apart from dark and bright there is no substance of seeing; apart from moving and still there is no stuff of hearing; without open and blocked the nature of smelling does not arise; neither changing nor bland, tasting has nothing to come from; neither apart nor in contact, the awareness of touch is originally absent; without perishing and arising, where would clear knowing lodge? Then comes the gate of entering the one: “You need only not follow moving and still, contact and separation, bland and changing, open and blocked, arising and perishing, dark and bright, these twelve conditioned appearances; pluck out any one faculty, free it from adhesion, subdue it within, and the subdued returns to the original truth and sends forth the original bright radiance; as the radiant nature sends forth brightness, the remaining five adhesions are plucked out in response and perfectly freed, and knowing and seeing no longer arise from the dusts before you. Brightness does not follow the faculties; lodging in the faculties, brightness is sent forth; from this the six faculties function for one another.” Not following the twelve appearances, pluck out any one faculty, free it from adhesion, subdue it within, and return to the original truth; when one faculty is plucked out, the other five are freed with it. Brightness does not follow the faculties but is sent forth lodging in them, and the six faculties function for one another.

The six faculties functioning for one another has its witnesses. “Aniruddha sees without eyes; the dragon Upananda hears without ears; the goddess of the Gaṅgā smells scent without a nose; Gavāṃpati knows taste with a different tongue; the spirit Śūnyatā has touch without a body—in the Tathāgata’s light he is made to appear for a moment; being of the substance of wind, his body is originally nothing; the śrāvakas who have attained quiescence in the samādhi of cessation, like Mahākāśyapa in this assembly, have long extinguished the mind faculty and know perfectly and brightly without depending on mental thought.” Seeing without eyes, hearing without ears, touch without a body, knowing perfectly and brightly with the mind faculty extinguished. Therefore, “once your faculties are perfectly plucked out, they shine within and send forth light; then the floating dusts and all the changing appearances of the vessel-world, like hot water melting ice, are at the very thought transformed into unsurpassed knowing-awareness”—when the six faculties are perfectly plucked out, the floating dusts and the changing appearances of the vessel-world are like ice melting in hot water. Then an example close to home: a man gathers his seeing in his eyes, shuts them quickly, and the appearance of darkness comes before him; the six faculties go dark, and head and feet are alike; yet if this man follows his body about with his hands, though he does not see, he tells head from foot at a touch, “the awareness and knowing are the same.” “Seeing depends on brightness; in darkness there is no seeing; if it is sent forth of itself without brightness, then the appearances of darkness can never dim it.” If seeing depends on brightness, in darkness it does not see; if it is sent forth of itself without depending on brightness, darkness cannot dim it. “Once faculties and dusts are dissolved, how could awakened brightness fail to become perfect and wondrous?”

Ānanda doubts again. The Buddha has said that the awakened mind at the stage of cause must accord with the names of the stage of result; at the stage of result, “bodhi, nirvāṇa, suchness, buddha-nature, the amala-consciousness, the empty tathāgatagarbha, the great perfect mirror wisdom—these seven names, though their designations differ, are pure and perfectly complete, their substance and nature firm and solid, like the Vajra King, permanently abiding and indestructible.” Yet “if this seeing and hearing, apart from dark and bright, moving and still, open and blocked, ultimately have no substance”—seeing and hearing, apart from the dusts, have no substance—“how can one take this ultimate annihilation as the cause of cultivation and hope to obtain the Tathāgata’s seven permanently abiding fruits?” To take something that is annihilated apart from the dusts as the cause and seek a permanently abiding result—does this not contradict what the Buddha said earlier, “profound, essential, perfect, and permanent”?

The Buddha says: “You are learned but have not exhausted the outflows; in your mind you know only the cause of inversion; when the true inversion comes before you, you truly cannot recognize it.” You know the reasoning of inversion, but when real inversion is right in front of you, you do not recognize it. So he uses an ordinary matter. “Then the Tathāgata ordered Rāhula to strike the bell once, and asked Ānanda”: “Do you hear now?” Ānanda and the assembly say they hear. The sound of the bell dies away, and the Buddha asks again: do you hear? They say they do not hear. He strikes again, asks again, they say they hear. The Buddha asks: “How is it that you hear? How is it that you do not hear?” They answer: “When the bell is struck we hear; when, after it has been struck a while, the sound dies away, and sound and echo are both cut off, that is called not hearing.” The Buddha again has the bell struck, and changes the question: “Is there sound now?” They answer, there is sound. The sound dies away; he asks: is there sound? They answer, no sound. He strikes again; they answer, there is sound. The Buddha asks: “How is it that there is sound? How is it that there is no sound?” They answer: “When the bell is struck, that is called there being sound; when, after it has been struck a while, the sound dies away, and sound and echo are both cut off, that is called there being no sound.”

The Buddha says: “How is it that your own words now equivocate?” The assembly and Ānanda ask: how have we equivocated? The Buddha says: “I ask you about hearing, and you say hearing; I ask you again about sound, and you say sound. Only hearing and sound—your answers are not settled; how is this not called equivocation?” Asked about hearing, they answer hearing; asked about sound, they answer sound—are hearing and sound, after all, one thing or two? “When the sound dies away without echo, you say there is no hearing; if there were truly no hearing, the nature of hearing would have perished, like dry wood; when the bell is struck again, how would you know?” If the nature of hearing perished as soon as the sound died away, like dry wood, then when the bell rings again, how do you know it? “Knowing there is, knowing there is not—it is the dust of sound that is at one time absent and at another present; how could that nature of hearing be present or absent for you? If hearing were truly absent, who would know that it is absent?” Present and absent belong to the sound, not to the nature of hearing; when you say “no hearing,” who is it that knows this absence? “Therefore, Ānanda, sound within hearing has its own arising and perishing; it is not that your hearing of sound’s arising and sound’s perishing makes your nature of hearing present or absent.” Sound arises and perishes of itself within hearing; it is not that the arising and perishing of sound make your nature of hearing present or absent. “You are still inverted, mistaking sound for hearing; what wonder that you are confused, and take the permanent for the annihilated?” Taking sound for hearing, and so taking the permanent for the annihilated.

At the end is the simile of the man sound asleep. A man is fast asleep, and while he sleeps his household pounds cloth and husks rice; in his dream he hears the pounding and husking and takes it for the beating of a drum or the striking of a bell, and in the dream he even wonders why this bell sounds like wood or stone; when he wakes, he knows it was the sound of the pestle, and tells his household, “just now, while I dreamed, I mistook this husking for the sound of a drum.” “While this man was dreaming, did he remember stillness and movement, opening and closing, open and blocked? Though his body slept, his nature of hearing was not dimmed.” He was asleep; his nature of hearing was not. “Even when your body dissolves and the light of your life passes away, how could this nature dissolve and perish for you?” The body dissolves, the light of life passes—why would this nature perish with it?

The fascicle closes on practice: “Because living beings, from beginningless time, have followed forms and sounds, pursuing their thoughts, flowing on and on, they have never awakened to the nature that is pure, wondrous, and permanent. Not following what is permanent, they pursue what arises and perishes; so, life after life, they flow on in mixed defilement. If you abandon arising and perishing and keep to true permanence, the permanent light comes before you, and the dusts, the faculties, and the cognizing mind at once dissolve and fall away. The appearances of thought are dust; the feelings of consciousness are defilement; when both are left far behind, your dharma-eye at once becomes clear and bright—how could you fail to become unsurpassed knowing-awareness?” Fascicle Four stops here; the closing title of the fascicle reads “The Great Buddha-Crown Sūtra of the Myriad Practices, Śūraṅgama, Fascicle Four.”

This fascicle begins with Pūrṇa asking “how does it suddenly arise” and ends with Ānanda listening to a bell. The first half says how falsity arises and how it stops; the second half says from which faculty to begin the practice. The passage on striking the bell brings all that has been said up to the ear and tests it there: sound arises and perishes; the nature of hearing does not. Ānanda had asked earlier, “how can one take this ultimate annihilation as the cause of cultivation”; the answer is not in the Buddha’s words but in the stillness that he himself can still hear after the bell has died away.

Carrying Forward — The Two Awakenings, True and False; Apart from ‘Is’ and Not ‘Is’

What has gone before is the meaning of the sūtra text itself. What follows looks on from the side, with a commentator’s eye—the commentary is not the sūtra; it is the same matter seen from another position.

Of what Pūrṇa asks, Zixuan speaks gravely: “This is a great node of doubt and difficulty under the gate of the emptiness of dharmas, the greatest obstacle to cultivation and realization.” He says that Pūrṇa, “though in his traces a lesser saint, in this sūtra of perfect penetration tells of an awakening that is nothing but the great way, so that the difficulty he states is no different from Vajragarbha’s; let students look closely here.” The weight of the question is the same as Vajragarbha’s question in the Sūtra of Perfect Awakening, and so he urges students to look closely. On “the nature of true supreme meaning within the supreme meaning,” which the Buddha consents to expound, Zixuan says: “The Tathāgata always teaches according to the two truths, the conventional truth and the truth of supreme meaning. What is taught now differs from the usual teaching; it is the supreme-meaning truth of supreme meaning. The one true dharma-realm, the real character of the middle way, gathers in every dharma and pervades every dharma; the highest saints and the lowest common people, the sentient and the insentient, all accomplish the Buddha-way. This is the ultimate proclamation, the final bequest.”

The sentence “the nature-awakening is necessarily bright; falsely it is taken as a bright awakening” Zixuan reads as the knot of the two awakenings, true and false: “The first clause concludes the true, the second concludes the false. The nature-awakening necessarily has true brightness, hence the words ‘the nature-awakening is wondrously bright, the original awakening is brightly wondrous.’ Falsity is to take brightness as different from awakening; hence your words, ‘if there is nothing brightened there is no bright awakening,’ since only when there is something brightened can it be called awakened brightness. Here the views of understanding and of delusion can be told apart.” The true awakening originally has wondrous brightness; falsity is to take brightness as another thing outside awakening, and so one says “if there is nothing brightened there is no bright awakening.” Explaining “awakening is not something brightened; because of brightening, an object is set up”: “The substance of true awakening originally has wondrous brightness; it does not arise following conditions, nor does it come from objects; originally quiescent and illuminating, the dharma-realm one characteristic; hence ‘awakening is not something brightened.’ Because of this true brightness, ignorance fails to understand, and falsely grasps it as an object.”

On the continuity of the world, Zixuan gathers the sequence of the four wheels into a few sentences: “First from brightness and dimness, shaking, there is the wind-wheel; from the wind’s shaking and brightness’s setting up there is the metal treasure; metal and wind rubbing gives rise to the nature of fire; fire steaming and metal moistening gives rise to water; water and fire crossing, with one force stronger and the other weaker—where water is stronger and fire weaker there are ocean and continents; where fire is stronger and water weaker there are mountains.”

“Apart from ‘is,’ apart from ‘is not’; it is ‘is,’ and it is not ‘is’” Zixuan explains as the two gates not two: “This is in terms of the two gates not being two, being only the one mind. Negating both the true and the conventional, hence ‘apart from is, apart from is not’; illuminating both the true and the conventional, hence ‘it is is, and it is not is.’ The three truths are one substance; therefore all are said to be the tathāgatagarbha.” He also speaks of the order of this passage: “First it uses ‘is not’ to dismiss appearances; next it uses ‘is’ to dismiss ‘is not’; at the end it still carries names and words, and has not reached the ultimate purport of the one truth. Apart from ‘is’ and not ‘is,’ without ‘not’ and not ‘not’—the way of language is cut off, the place of mental activity extinguished; only then is the one true dharma-realm, the tathāgatagarbha mind, revealed.” First ‘is not’ dismisses appearances, then ‘is’ dismisses ‘is not,’ and at the end even ‘is’ and ‘is not’ are left behind—only then is the way of language cut off. This explains why the sūtra first says a long string of ‘is not,’ then a long string of ‘is,’ and finally ‘apart from is, apart from is not.’

Of Yajñadatta Zixuan says: “Yajñadatta means ‘given by the sacrifice.’ The original head and the mirror together stand for the nature-awakening. Looking at the face stands for the forced awakening suddenly arising and the object falsely set up. Loving stands for firmly grasping without letting go, taking the appearance for the real. Delighting in having an appearance, he turns and loathes having none, and so is angry that his own head does not show its face. The true has no shape or appearance and does not comply with false feeling, so fright arises. Grasping appearance and confused about the nature, the wheel of rebirth does not cease, hence ‘ran about madly.’ A mountain-demon is a monster of the hills and marshes.” Head and mirror both stand for the nature-awakening; looking at the face is the forced awakening suddenly arising; loving is taking the appearance for the real; reproaching his own head is loathing the absence of appearance; running about madly is the wheel of rebirth not ceasing.

The two decisive meanings Zixuan explains through the two gates of calming and contemplation: “The wondrous samādhi, the Śūraṅgama concentration, is the contemplation of suchness. One who wishes to cultivate this contemplation must first have the expedient means; when the expedient means are accomplished, true cultivation can be hoped for. Therefore the two gates of calming and contemplation are called the first resolve to awaken, that is, the very first expedient means.”

Of the merits of the six faculties, “three fours and four threes, turning about, make twelve; the flow changes in three layers,” Zixuan says: “The meaning of the three changes has been explained in many ways, ancient and modern; each follows its own text and they cannot all be set out. The explanation given here adds no other method to change the number; it simply takes the present text’s past, present, and future and advances the positions of the reckoning, and so arrives at twelve hundred merits.” He adds no other method; he reckons by advancing the positions of the three times and four directions: “Thus at the first position, three times and four directions, turning about, make twelve, forming one layer; the reckoning position is one horizontal and two vertical, already past.”

“The essence of seeing reflects form; form is knotted into the faculty,” Zixuan explains: “The essence of seeing is false awareness. Subject and object perfume each other and are woven together, and the knot of the faculty is formed; hence ‘form is knotted into the faculty.’” “The faculty’s origin is called the pure four elements”: “Since awakening and brightness are mixed together, adhering to the profound and forming a compound, this is therefore called the pure four elements, which is the faculty of supreme meaning.”

Of the striking of the bell, Zixuan explains “equivocate”: “Now you grasp only a hearing that follows sound; this hearing, not being apart from sound, should only be called sound, and should not be called hearing. You say both that it is sound and that it is hearing; since you follow the words and assent to each, it becomes equivocation.” Explaining “how could that nature of hearing be present or absent for you”: “If this hearing truly perished with the sound, then your whole body should be like wood or stone; when the bell is struck again, how would you hear its echo? The five clauses from ‘knowing there is’ explain in contrast that there is no arising: the knowing of presence and absence belongs to the object of sound and has nothing to do with hearing; hence ‘it is the dust of sound that is at one time absent and at another present.’ The nature of hearing is permanently so and has never arisen or perished; hence ‘how could that nature of hearing be present or absent for you.’”

考據Apparatus

一、科判定位

本卷分節依長水子璿《首楞嚴義疏注經》科判;科判為讀法之導,非切分之權源,單元之界以底本卷題自標為準。

卷第四承卷第三七大皆如來藏清淨本然周遍法界之義,自卷題起,至卷尾題止;次卷另起。子璿判富樓那之問與如來之答為一大科:「二、破滿慈執相難性顯如來藏」〔T39n1799 0873b05〕本卷依子璿科判分為十八節,上位科照子璿逐字:

節子璿上位科科判題起字數
1「二、破滿慈執相難性顯如來藏」〔T39n1799 0873b05〕致請·許宣〔T19 0119c02〕452
2「四、答釋」〔T39n1799 0874b15〕答藏性生相疑〔T19 0120a02〕170
3「二、辨果相」〔T39n1799 0875c17〕辨果相·世界相續〔T19 0120a12〕215
4「二、辨果相」〔T39n1799 0875c17〕眾生相續〔T19 0120a25〕149
5「二、辨果相」〔T39n1799 0875c17〕業果相續〔T19 0120b05〕153
6「一、答藏性生相疑」〔T39n1799 0874b16〕結答·如來喻釋〔T19 0120b14〕391
7「四、答釋」〔T39n1799 0874b15〕答大性俱遍疑〔T19 0120c09〕886
8「二、釋別疑」〔T39n1799 0880c14〕釋滿慈疑妄因〔T19 0121b04〕430
9「二、釋別疑」〔T39n1799 0880c14〕釋慶喜難緣起〔T19 0121c03〕609
10「故此第二、明修行方便」〔T39n1799 0883b19〕阿難領悟祈修·總告許宣〔T19 0122a10〕284
11「二、別明二義」〔T39n1799 0884a22〕因果同異門〔T19 0122a27〕571
12「二、別明二義」〔T39n1799 0884a22〕根塵結解門〔T19 0122c03〕153
13「二、根塵結解門」〔T39n1799 0885b21〕別示根用優劣〔T19 0122c12〕372
14「二、根塵結解門」〔T39n1799 0885b21〕令揀圓根修證〔T19 0123a05〕446
15「三、令揀圓根修證」〔T39n1799 0886c06〕廣明根結之由·正示入一之門〔T19 0123b03〕650
16「二、別破疑情」〔T39n1799 0889a28〕別破疑情〔T19 0123c13〕199
17「一、真識斷滅疑」〔T39n1799 0889a28〕如來為斷〔T19 0123c25〕325
18「二、約事廣明」〔T39n1799 0889c07〕就聞性破其斷見〔T19 0124a15〕341

節 1 合子璿「一、致請」〔T39n1799 0873b05〕與「二、許宣」〔T39n1799 0874a23〕為一節,卷題與譯署在其首。節 2 為「一、答藏性生相疑」〔T39n1799 0874b16〕之初。節 3 起於子璿「二、辨果相」〔T39n1799 0875c17〕所牒首句「由是引起塵勞煩惱」〔T19 0120a12〕,其下先「一、由因引果」〔T39n1799 0875c17〕;世界相續起句「起為世界,靜成虛空」〔T19 0120a13〕在本節之內,子璿科為「二、正明果相」〔T39n1799 0876a14〕下之「一、世界相續」〔T39n1799 0876a14〕。節 4、節 5 為「二、眾生相續」〔T39n1799 0876c13〕、「三、業果相續」〔T39n1799 0877b10〕。節 6 合「二、結答」〔T39n1799 0877c05〕與「二、如來喻釋」〔T39n1799 0877c23〕,起於「富樓那!如是三種顛倒相續」〔T19 0120b14〕。節 7 為「二、答大性俱遍疑」〔T39n1799 0878c10〕。節 8、節 9 為「一、釋滿慈疑妄因」〔T39n1799 0880c15〕、「二、釋慶喜難緣起」〔T39n1799 0882a15〕。節 10 合「一、阿難領悟祈修」〔T39n1799 0883b20〕與「二、如來廣陳修證」〔T39n1799 0883c27〕下之「一、總告許宣」〔T39n1799 0883c27〕。節 11 為「一、因果同異門」〔T39n1799 0884a23〕,起於「云何初心二義決定?」〔T19 0122a27〕;節 12 為「二、根塵結解門」〔T39n1799 0885b21〕之初。節 13 為「二、別示根用優劣」〔T39n1799 0885c21〕,起於「阿難!云何名為眾生世界?」〔T19 0122c12〕;節 14 為「三、令揀圓根修證」〔T39n1799 0886c06〕,起於「阿難!汝今欲逆生死欲流」〔T19 0123a05〕。節 15 合「二、廣明根結之由」〔T39n1799 0887b29〕與「三、正示入一之門」〔T39n1799 0888a29〕,起於「由明、暗等二種相形」〔T19 0123b03〕。節 16 為「二、別破疑情」〔T39n1799 0889a28〕下「一、真識斷滅疑」〔T39n1799 0889a28〕之「一、阿難伸疑」〔T39n1799 0889a29〕。節 17 為「二、如來為斷」〔T39n1799 0889b29〕,擊鍾之事在其下「二、約事廣明」〔T39n1799 0889c07〕。節 18 為「二、就聞性破其斷見」〔T39n1799 0890a12〕,起於「阿難!聲銷無響」〔T19 0124a15〕。

說者:節 1 富樓那致請:「爾時,富樓那彌多羅尼子在大眾中即從座起」〔T19 0119c07〕;佛許宣:「爾時,世尊告富樓那及諸會中漏盡無學諸阿羅漢」〔T19 0119c25〕。節 2 佛牒富樓那之問「清淨本然,云何忽生山河大地?」〔T19 0120a02〕,與富樓那問答往復五轉;其下至節 6「因此虛妄,終而復始」〔T19 0120b16〕為佛長答。富樓那再問「如來今得妙空明覺,山河大地有為習漏何當復生?」〔T19 0120b19〕;迷人之喻佛問富樓那答,「不也。世尊!」〔T19 0120b26〕不標說者,為富樓那答佛。節 7 佛牒富樓那之問「地、水、火、風本性圓融周遍法界」〔T19 0120c09〕,長答至「得少為足」〔T19 0121b03〕。節 8 富樓那問妄因,演若達多之問富樓那答「是人心狂,更無他故」〔T19 0121b14〕,其下佛長答。節 9 阿難牒佛語「殺、盜、婬業三緣斷故,三因不生」〔T19 0121c04〕而伸疑,「佛告阿難」〔T19 0121c12〕以下為佛答。節 10 阿難領悟祈修;世尊「宣示阿難及諸大眾」〔T19 0122a25〕,二決定義長說至「彼六知根一時清淨」〔T19 0123a14〕。節 14 阿難問一門深入,佛答中阿難一句「我用耳聞」〔T19 0123a24〕。節 16 阿難伸斷滅之疑。節 17 佛告阿難,「勅羅睺羅擊鍾一聲」〔T19 0123c28〕以下佛問、阿難與大眾答,凡十九轉;佛「我問汝聞,汝則言聞」〔T19 0124a13〕以下長說,至節 18 卷末。

卷題與一名夾注逐字:「大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經卷第四〔一名中印度那蘭陀大道場經,於灌頂部錄出別行〕」〔T19 0119c02〕。

譯署一行逐字:「唐天竺沙門般剌蜜帝譯」〔T19 0119c06〕。「般剌蜜帝」照底本錄。

卷尾題逐字:「大佛頂萬行首楞嚴經卷第四」〔T19 0124b06〕。

本卷無偈。「佛頂神呪」〔T19 0122a02〕、「神呪力」〔T19 0122a06〕為經中之語,非呪文之段。卷四正文連卷題、譯署、卷尾題,計六千七百九十六字。

二、異譯對勘

本經唯一漢譯,無異譯;大正無別本注。

三、經論宗依

子璿於本卷所引經論,逐字並錄,依節次:

  • 節 1:子璿引《正理論》曰:「或有於境,智不及愚。所謂凡夫善通三藏,羅漢不識赤鹽。」〔T39n1799 0873c03〕又引《涅槃經》曰:「我於餘經說有聲聞不得作佛,非於此經作如是說。」〔T39n1799 0874b07〕
  • 節 2:子璿引《圓覺》曰:「一切覺故,圓覺普照,寂滅無二。」〔T39n1799 0874c08〕又引見道偈曰:「若時於所緣,智都無所得,爾時住唯識,離二取相故。」〔T39n1799 0875a07〕又引經曰:「不了心及緣,則生二妄想;了心及境界,妄想則不生。」〔T39n1799 0875a08〕又引《起信》曰:「由不如實知真如法一故,不覺心起而有於念。」〔T39n1799 0875a27〕又引《纓絡經》曰:「四住地前更無法起。」〔T39n1799 0875b03〕
  • 節 3:子璿引《起信》曰:「以有境界緣故,復生六種相。」〔T39n1799 0875c24〕
  • 節 6:子璿引《維摩》曰:「佛為增上慢人說離婬怒癡;若無增上慢,佛說婬怒癡性即是解脫。」〔T39n1799 0878b11〕
  • 節 7:子璿引《圓覺經》曰:「但諸聲聞所圓境界,身心語言皆悉斷滅,終不能至彼之親證所現涅槃」〔T39n1799 0880b21〕又引《大集經》曰:「閻浮所有色像,大海皆有印文」〔T39n1799 0880c09〕
  • 節 8:子璿引《起信》曰:「覺心初起,心無初相。」〔T39n1799 0881b21〕又引曰:「所言覺義者,謂心體離念,離念相者等虛空界,無所不遍,法界一相,即是如來平等法身,依此法身說名本覺。」〔T39n1799 0881c14〕
  • 節 9:子璿引《圓覺》曰:「有照有覺俱名障礙,是故菩薩常覺不住,照與照者同時寂滅。」〔T39n1799 0882c10〕又引曰:「種種取捨皆是輪迴,未出輪迴而辨圓覺,彼圓覺性即同流轉,若免輪迴無有是處。」〔T39n1799 0883a12〕
  • 節 10:子璿引《華嚴》曰:「譬如有力王,率土咸戴仰,止觀亦如是,一切所依賴。」〔T39n1799 0884a11〕又引《起信》曰:「所言止者,謂止一切境界相,隨順奢摩他觀義故。」〔T39n1799 0884a15〕
  • 節 11:子璿引《維摩》曰:「無以生滅心行說實相法。」〔T39n1799 0884b05〕又引《普賢觀》曰:「大乘因者諸法實相,大乘果者亦諸法實相。」〔T39n1799 0884b07〕又依《法華論》說:「日月歲年總名為劫,乃至成住壞空不離時分。」〔T39n1799 0884c10〕
  • 節 12:子璿引《涅槃》曰:「六入空聚,當有六大惡賊必斷汝命,當即遠離。」〔T39n1799 0885c18〕
  • 節 14:子璿引《殃掘經》曰:「所謂彼眼根,於諸如來常,具足無減修,了了分明見。」〔T39n1799 0887a03〕又引《般若》曰:「須陀洹名為入流,而無所入,不入色聲香味觸法。」〔T39n1799 0887b18〕
  • 節 15:子璿引《楞伽》曰:「不了心及緣,則生二妄想,了心及境界,妄想則不生。」〔T39n1799 0888b08〕又引《圓覺》曰:「無知覺明不依諸礙」〔T39n1799 0888b16〕又引《維摩》曰:「不起滅定而現諸威儀」〔T39n1799 0888c24〕

節 4、節 5、節 13、節 16、節 17、節 18,子璿疏中不引經論。節 2 所引偈子璿但題「見道偈」,所引經不題經名,照錄。子璿於節 8 另引《莊子》釋肯綮,非經論,錄於目四。

四、本段釋要

子璿逐節釋要,逐字並錄;子璿牒經多略作『…至…』,此不補經文。

節 1 致請·許宣 子璿曰:「如來藏心不空不有、即性即相,名第一義。」〔T39n1799 0873b12〕釋真勝義性,子璿曰:「如來常依二諦說法,謂世俗諦、勝義諦。今所說者異乎常說,謂勝義勝義諦也。」〔T39n1799 0874a27〕釋定性聲聞,子璿曰:「方便教說定性二乘、無性闡提不得成佛,如焦芽敗種等。今此會通,咸歸一乘,究竟涅槃。」〔T39n1799 0874b05〕又曰:「阿練若,云無諠雜。」〔T39n1799 0874b11〕

節 2 答藏性生相疑 子璿曰:「一真如心是佛常說,或名法界、或名實相、或如來藏性、或妙淨明心。」〔T39n1799 0874b20〕釋性覺妙明、本覺明妙,子璿曰:「性覺、本覺指體也。妙明、明妙,顯用也。」〔T39n1799 0874b29〕又曰:「夫真覺者,離能所相。」〔T39n1799 0875a06〕釋性覺必明、妄為明覺,子璿曰:「上句結真,下句結妄。」〔T39n1799 0875a17〕又曰:「性覺必有真明,故云性覺妙明、本覺明妙。」〔T39n1799 0875a18〕

節 3 辨果相·世界相續 子璿曰:「由前三細引起四麁,謂智相相續,執取計名也。」〔T39n1799 0875c19〕釋世界之名,子璿曰:「世為遷流,界為方位,前後改轉隔別不同,故名世界」〔T39n1799 0875c28〕釋風輪,子璿曰:「是故世界之初風輪為始,虛空即為世界所依。」〔T39n1799 0876a22〕釋洲潬,子璿曰:「水中可居曰洲,水中沙聚曰潬。」〔T39n1799 0876b26〕結世界相續,子璿曰:「外相雖爾,皆由內心;內心無變,外豈差別?」〔T39n1799 0876c11〕

節 4 眾生相續 釋明妄非他、覺明為咎,子璿曰:「明謂顯發,妄之顯發別非他緣,但由自己一念不了,能所妄分,以為過咎」〔T39n1799 0876c16〕釋同業相纏,子璿曰:「胎、卵有情要因父母同業相感,故云同業相纏。」〔T39n1799 0877a01〕又曰:「羯羅藍,云凝滑。」〔T39n1799 0877a21〕結眾生相續,子璿曰:「捨身受身無能斷絕,故云眾生相續。」〔T39n1799 0877b09〕

節 5 業果相續 釋欲貪,子璿曰:「愛欲情深互相纏縛,結滯難捨,故云不離。」〔T39n1799 0877b13〕釋殺貪,子璿曰:「為貪故殺,用滋我命。」〔T39n1799 0877b18〕釋盜貪,子璿曰:「不與而取,故名為盜。今非理食他,即奪其命也。」〔T39n1799 0877b23〕結業果相續,子璿曰:「殺、盜、婬三正是業道,皆由貪愛以之為緣,故此三種皆云貪也。」〔T39n1799 0877c03〕

節 6 結答·如來喻釋 釋覺明明了知性,子璿曰:「覺明妙體本有明了知性,即性覺妙明也。」〔T39n1799 0877c08〕釋迷方之喻,子璿曰:「迷人,眾生也。聚落,如來藏也。」〔T39n1799 0878a08〕釋木成灰之喻,子璿曰:「覺性如地,惑障如木,加行如燧,智照如火,涅槃如灰。」〔T39n1799 0878b20〕又曰:「菩提智果,涅槃斷果,雙合二喻也。」〔T39n1799 0878b24〕

節 7 答大性俱遍疑 子璿曰:「虛空,藏性也。群相,七大也。」〔T39n1799 0878c18〕又曰:「七大性真,元如來藏。」〔T39n1799 0879a13〕釋俱非,子璿曰:「此上總非諸相者,即約真如門,顯真諦義一切皆空」〔T39n1799 0880a05〕釋俱即,子璿曰:「前約真如不變絕相,此約隨緣成生滅門,顯俗諦也。」〔T39n1799 0880a24〕釋離即離非、是即非即,子璿曰:「此約二門不二,唯是一心。雙遮真俗,故曰離即離非;雙照真俗,故云是即非即。三諦一體,是故皆云即如來藏。」〔T39n1799 0880b01〕釋琴瑟之喻,子璿曰:「琴等,眾生也。妙音,藏性也。妙指,實智也。」〔T39n1799 0880b28〕又曰:「無上覺道如寶所,小乘涅槃如化城。」〔T39n1799 0880c13〕

節 8 釋滿慈疑妄因 子璿曰:「障盡者必知妄始,故此問也。」〔T39n1799 0880c22〕釋演若達多,子璿曰:「演若達多,此云祠授。」〔T39n1799 0881a08〕又曰:「魑魅,山澤之怪也。」〔T39n1799 0881a13〕釋妄無因,子璿曰:「直明妄無因也。妄必無因,有因不妄,妄之一字甚好思量。」〔T39n1799 0881a21〕釋三緣三因,子璿曰:「煩惱為緣,能潤業故。殺等為因,正是業故。」〔T39n1799 0881c03〕釋歇即菩提,子璿曰:「分別不生,前後際斷,故名為歇。」〔T39n1799 0881c13〕釋肯綮,子璿曰:「言肯綮者,骨邊細肉也。」〔T39n1799 0881c21〕又引《莊子》曰:「經肯綮之未甞,而況大觚乎。」〔T39n1799 0881c22〕釋衣珠之喻,子璿曰:「《法華》中亦有此喻,彼約結緣,此約本有,意不同耳。」〔T39n1799 0882a07〕

節 9 釋慶喜難緣起 子璿曰:「老梵志者,竝是年長。」〔T39n1799 0882a27〕又曰:「因緣、自然依假建立,菩提真性眾相都亡」〔T39n1799 0882b02〕釋菩提心生、生滅心滅,子璿曰:「若有執言真心可得、分別可亡,斯則菩提心生、生滅心滅,但是生滅,無菩提生;無生滅滅,方無功用。」〔T39n1799 0882c08〕釋本然和合,子璿曰:「本然,自然也。和合,因緣也。二皆不立,故云俱離。此離亦離,故云俱非。」〔T39n1799 0882c28〕釋一日修無漏業,子璿曰:「應知理觀兼修,定慧雙運,豈但辨義說文而已哉!」〔T39n1799 0883a21〕釋性比丘尼,子璿曰:「過去為婆羅門女,名為本性,今從昔號名性比丘尼。耶輸陀羅,云華色。」〔T39n1799 0883b07〕

節 10 阿難領悟祈修·總告許宣 子璿曰:「超過一切世出世間,故云無上。」〔T39n1799 0883c02〕釋旅泊華屋之喻,子璿曰:「天王,佛也。賜與,開示也。華屋,藏體也。雖獲,信解也。門入,修行也。」〔T39n1799 0883c14〕又曰:「捐棄,畢盡也。疇昔,往日也。無餘者,無明永盡,二死已亡,究竟之無餘也。」〔T39n1799 0883c20〕釋妙三摩提,子璿曰:「妙三摩提首楞嚴定,即真如觀。」〔T39n1799 0884a07〕釋二決定義,子璿曰:「一者審觀因地及與果心,起隨順行,即依真如門修止也。」〔T39n1799 0884a13〕又曰:「二者審觀煩惱結解根元,起對治行,即依生滅門修觀也。」〔T39n1799 0884a16〕

節 11 因果同異門 子璿曰:「既能信解果海無念,絕名離相,本非生滅。」〔T39n1799 0884a27〕釋可作之法與虛空,子璿曰:「妄心如器界,所作性故。真心如虛空,理無為故。」〔T39n1799 0884b15〕釋劫濁,子璿曰:「梵云劫波,此云時分。」〔T39n1799 0884c10〕又曰:「一念初起無明之始,時之初分,故名為劫,非劫末時之劫濁也。」〔T39n1799 0884c17〕釋見濁,子璿曰:「身之質礙,由見聞知織水火風」〔T39n1799 0884c21〕釋煩惱濁,子璿曰:「六識分別三世遍緣,憶過去境,識現在塵,誦習未來諸有境界。」〔T39n1799 0884c28〕釋眾生濁,子璿曰:「生滅是行,行即是業」〔T39n1799 0885a07〕釋命濁,子璿曰:「命是報法,依業所引。」〔T39n1799 0885a13〕釋澄濁水之喻,子璿曰:「真覺如水,見聞如濁,定身如靜器,定法如澄靜。砂如煩惱,泥如無明,地前名伏,地上名斷,究竟名精純,變現即起用。」〔T39n1799 0885b16〕

節 12 根塵結解門 子璿曰:「前第一義令止妄心,伏還元覺,即是修止。此第二義,令審詳煩惱,觀察對治,即是修觀。先止後觀,法應如是。」〔T39n1799 0885b25〕釋發業潤生、誰作誰受,子璿曰:「無明發業,愛取潤生,六識能作,第八能受」〔T39n1799 0885b28〕釋六為賊媒,子璿曰:「六根為賊媒者,一引外賊,即六塵也;二起內賊,即煩惱也。」〔T39n1799 0885c16〕

節 13 別示根用優劣 子璿曰:「世界有三,謂眾生、五陰、器界也,揀非餘二,故標眾生。」〔T39n1799 0885c27〕釋三四四三、宛轉十二、流變三疊,子璿曰:「今所解者,不加別法以變其數,只將今文過、現、未來進動算位,便成一千二百功德。」〔T39n1799 0886a10〕又曰:「此約眾生身中六根取境本分功能作用名為功德,非同《法華》持經所熏令成淨用。」〔T39n1799 0886a29〕釋眼根,子璿曰:「左右旁觀三分之二者」〔T39n1799 0886b09〕釋鼻根,子璿曰:「出、入、中交共成三分,一分四百,闕於中交,故得八百。」〔T39n1799 0886b19〕釋舌根,子璿曰:「能詮言句猶可分限,所詮理趣莫能盡極,故千二百。」〔T39n1799 0886b24〕釋身根,子璿曰:「合具違、順,離但捨受,故云不知。」〔T39n1799 0886b29〕釋意根,子璿曰:「意能遍緣三世三性世、出世法,無不具足,文顯易知。」〔T39n1799 0886c05〕

節 14 令揀圓根修證 子璿曰:「返妄歸真,真為流根,故云至不生滅」〔T39n1799 0886c10〕又曰:「欲得此覺,應選圓根為趣入之要,若圓聽十方,耳根最勝,意令選擇以入圓通。」〔T39n1799 0886c12〕又曰:「此是如來知時知機,令自選擇」〔T39n1799 0886c17〕釋一六,子璿曰:「一六之情正是法執,執根是實,有一六故。」〔T39n1799 0887a20〕又曰:「若言一者,六用應同,眼合能聞,足應解說。」〔T39n1799 0887a28〕又曰:「若言六異,應不相干,一處聞經,二何欽問?」〔T39n1799 0887b04〕釋太虛空參合群器之喻,子璿曰:「太虛,如來藏也。群器,六塵也。異空,六根也。」〔T39n1799 0887b26〕

節 15 廣明根結之由·正示入一之門 子璿曰:「本一圓常妙湛明性,所相妄現,分明暗殊」〔T39n1799 0887c03〕釋清淨四大,子璿曰:「既覺明相雜,粘湛合成,由是名為清淨四大,即勝義根也。」〔T39n1799 0887c08〕又曰:「勝義根色屬不可見,而有對礙,故寄世俗根所依處蒲萄之相,表顯勝義。」〔T39n1799 0887c11〕釋幽室見,子璿曰:「居在身中不彰外相,如幽室見。」〔T39n1799 0888a14〕釋失彼精了、粘妄發光,子璿曰:「性覺之體本有真明,由彼妄覺影明忽起,遂令真覺隱於精了」〔T39n1799 0888a20〕又曰:「由境有根,如風起浪,境風不息,識浪奚窮?故離塵境無根識耳。」〔T39n1799 0888a28〕釋明不循根,子璿曰:「謂真妙覺明不循根境,即不逐緣生、不因境起,了然自覺,即是性明。」〔T39n1799 0888b14〕釋阿那律陀,子璿曰:「阿那律陀,云無滅,白飯王子,以多睡故如來呵之,從此精進,七日不眠,則失雙目。」〔T39n1799 0888b21〕釋六人之例,子璿曰:「然上所說,欲顯真覺不假根塵,且引六人略以為比」〔T39n1799 0888c25〕釋湯銷氷,子璿曰:「三界萬法皆由無明妄念而得分別,今六根既拔,塵無所粘,妄念不生,性明內瑩」〔T39n1799 0889a03〕釋急合眼之喻,子璿曰:「此則近以世人六根隔越不相通用,尚有知覺同者,豈況真覺須假根塵耶?」〔T39n1799 0889a17〕

節 16 別破疑情 釋七常住果,子璿曰:「菩提,云知覺,即智果。涅槃,云寂滅,即斷果。離偽妄無遷改,故曰真如。照察不變,名為佛性。」〔T39n1799 0889b07〕又曰:「菴摩羅,云無垢,離障所顯,即白淨無垢識也。」〔T39n1799 0889b09〕又曰:「七名雖別,一體無殊,堅固凝然,常住不動如金剛也。」〔T39n1799 0889b12〕釋畢竟斷滅,子璿曰:「因緣所起,自體本無,故云畢竟斷滅。」〔T39n1799 0889b21〕又曰:「如來說有湛精圓常,洎今所推唯是斷滅,明言雖有,考實元無,若此相違,真實何在?」〔T39n1799 0889b26〕

節 17 如來為斷 子璿曰:「分別見妄能所強生,為顛倒因。迷常執斷,名為真倒。」〔T39n1799 0889c04〕釋擊鍾,子璿曰:「擊鍾三問,審定稱聞,欲轉問宗,又令重釋。」〔T39n1799 0889c16〕又曰:「一則斥成矯亂,一則顯其性常,令知生滅之中有不生滅,不因聲滅、不因聲生,生滅圓離即常真實,斯則了然常住,何斷滅之有乎?」〔T39n1799 0889c17〕釋少選、有頃,子璿曰:「少選猶少頃也,有頃猶頃剋也,皆時之少分也。」〔T39n1799 0889c25〕釋矯亂,子璿曰:「斥破意者,此聞若因聲有,則不離聲。若離聲有,此是真聞。」〔T39n1799 0890a08〕又曰:「又言是聲、又言是聞,既隨言印順,故成矯亂。」〔T39n1799 0890a11〕

節 18 就聞性破其斷見 子璿曰:「有無之知自屬聲境,且不關聞」〔T39n1799 0890a20〕又曰:「聞性常然未曾起滅」〔T39n1799 0890a21〕釋重睡人之喻,子璿曰:「睡人六識歸種,思覺不行,但任運聞,即真聞性。」〔T39n1799 0890b15〕又曰:「形命雖遷,真常不動,妄識尚在,況乎聞性隨汝消謝?」〔T39n1799 0890b22〕釋守於真常,子璿曰:「若能亡緣內照,不逐前塵,塵既不緣,根無所偶,返流全一,六用不行,淨覺現前,寂照明露,斯則守於真常,根塵銷落也。」〔T39n1799 0890c03〕釋想相為塵、識情為垢,子璿曰:「想相即境,情即是根,根境識三俱能染污,障翳般若。」〔T39n1799 0890c06〕

五、諸家異釋

本卷唯依子璿;交光真鑑《楞嚴經正脈疏》存目,本卷不引。

子璿疏中自錄之異說與存疑,逐字並錄,不判:

  • 性覺本覺之古解:子璿曰:「古人所解各隨其意,云云在彼,不能具敘。」〔T39n1799 0874c09〕
  • 四輪之次:子璿並錄小乘之說:「然小乘宗,水輪在前、金輪在後,與此不同者,而不知風輪持水即是堅礙。」〔T39n1799 0876b14〕
  • 縱立認真自然:子璿錄古人之解而不取:「古人於此不言縱立認真自然,斯則不唯增戲論心,反令圓文成外道教,焉敢聞命!」〔T39n1799 0882c23〕
  • 登伽證果:子璿設問:「問:阿難尚在初果,登伽何以却證第三?」〔T39n1799 0883a22〕自答:「答:一、約權實,阿難示迹現多聞無功,故在初果;登伽實人,顯呪力功大,速證第三。」〔T39n1799 0883a23〕
  • 三變之義:子璿曰:「三變之義古今多解,各見其文不能具敘。」〔T39n1799 0886a09〕
  • 有色無色之諍:子璿曰:「若以有色、無色為諍論者,猶邀空華結為空果,故此所明六皆四大,無相違也。」〔T39n1799 0888a16〕
  • 六人緣起存疑:子璿於跋難陀龍曰:「無耳而聽,未詳緣起。」〔T39n1799 0888b29〕於殑伽神女曰:「非鼻聞香,未見其緣。」〔T39n1799 0888c04〕於驕梵鉢提曰:「異舌者,未見別緣,或可既云牛相,即其牛舌也。」〔T39n1799 0888c09〕
  • 迦葉入定:子璿並錄二說:「《俱舍》即云已入涅槃,餘說入定。」〔T39n1799 0888c21〕又曰:「故知入定、涅槃俱不可測。」〔T39n1799 0888c23〕
  • 睡人聞性:子璿設難而自通:「若唯約喻,睡人應無聞性,但約不隨根起,非由作意,故是真聞。」〔T39n1799 0890b16〕

子璿牒經之字與底本有異者,並錄不判:「生羯羅藍、遏蒲曇等」〔T39n1799 0877a14〕,底本作羯囉藍、遏蒱曇;「隨力彊弱」〔T39n1799 0877b17〕,底本作強;「因悟而出」〔T39n1799 0878a05〕,底本作所,明本作而;「倏有悟人」〔T39n1799 0878a13〕,底本作倐;「亦如翳人見空中華」〔T39n1799 0878a27〕,底本作瞖、花;「相陵滅義」〔T39n1799 0879a09〕,底本作𣣋;「先無準的」〔T39n1799 0879a29〕,底本作准;「非般剌若」〔T39n1799 0879c25〕,底本作鉢,宋元明本作般;「離即離非、是即非即」〔T39n1799 0880a29〕,底本作「離即、離非,是即、非即」;「嗔責己頭」〔T39n1799 0881a07〕,底本作瞋;「大目揵連」〔T39n1799 0882a26〕,底本作犍,宋本作揵;「消其愛欲」〔T39n1799 0883b04〕,底本作銷;「羅睺母」〔T39n1799 0883b05〕,底本作羅睺羅母,宋元明本無羅字;「疑惑消除」〔T39n1799 0883b22〕,底本作銷;「賜與華屋」〔T39n1799 0883c13〕,底本作以,宋元明本作與;「不生疲倦」〔T39n1799 0884a06〕,底本作惓;「汝身現搏四大為體」〔T39n1799 0884c19〕,底本作摶;「當先擇生死根本」〔T39n1799 0885a23〕,底本作死生;「復還元覺」〔T39n1799 0885a28〕,底本作伏,明本作復;「貯於靜器」〔T39n1799 0885b13〕,底本作淨,宋元明本作靜;「墮裂」〔T39n1799 0885c11〕,底本作隳,大正原刊作墮;「空無形相」〔T39n1799 0885c11〕,底本作相形;「世間只目」〔T39n1799 0886a03〕,底本作秖;「左右旁觀」〔T39n1799 0886b06〕,底本作傍,明本作旁;「唯聖與凡無不包容」〔T39n1799 0886c03〕,底本作惟、苞;「雖得六消,猶末亡一」〔T39n1799 0887b11〕,底本作銷、未;「摶觸成根」〔T39n1799 0888a04〕,底本作搏;「攬法成根」〔T39n1799 0888a10〕,底本作覽,明本作攬;「生滅、明暗」〔T39n1799 0888b01〕,底本作暗明;「離於明暗」〔T39n1799 0889b14〕,底本作暗明;「擊久聲消」〔T39n1799 0889c15〕,底本作銷;「唯聞與聲」〔T39n1799 0890a07〕,底本作惟,宋本作唯;「或為撞鍾」〔T39n1799 0890b12〕,底本作復,元明本作為;「靜搖、開閑、通塞」〔T39n1799 0890b15〕,底本作開閉;「根塵識心」〔T39n1799 0890c01〕,底本作塵根、識心,宋元明本作根塵。

六、術語

富樓那、摩登伽、圓通、六根、如來藏、三緣、佛性等七名已見卷首序目。塵勞、浮根四塵、禪那、三摩提、識心、真心、前塵等七名相已於卷第一釋,不重列;見、聞、覺、知、第一義、梵志、斷滅、見精、浮塵、非和合等十名相已於卷第二釋,不重列;陀羅尼、阿那律陀、矯亂三名,卷第二已出大陀羅尼、阿那律、四種不死矯亂論議,亦不重列;清淨本然、周遍法界、四大、十八界、戲論、寶王、舜若多、無上覺等八名相已於卷第三釋,不重列。菩提、涅槃、根、塵、識、因緣、自然、和合、妄想、無漏、顛倒、無始、第一義諦等十三名相已於起信論/楞伽經術語釋,不重列。

本卷首見名相,依出現次第;卷中自有釋語者並錄其句,無自釋者唯列名與錨:

  • 富樓那彌多羅尼子〔T19 0119c07〕:卷首序目已見富樓那,本卷首出全名。
  • 真勝義性〔T19 0119c26〕:「如來今日普為此會宣勝義中真勝義性」〔T19 0119c26〕
  • 定性聲聞〔T19 0119c27〕・二空〔T19 0119c27〕
  • 一乘寂滅場地〔T19 0119c28〕・真阿練若〔T19 0119c29〕
  • 性覺妙明・本覺明妙〔T19 0120a03〕:「汝常不聞如來宣說性覺妙明本覺明妙?」〔T19 0120a03〕
  • 明覺〔T19 0120a06〕:「性覺必明,妄為明覺。」〔T19 0120a08〕
  • 無同異〔T19 0120a10〕:「無同異中熾然成異」〔T19 0120a10〕
  • 風輪〔T19 0120a15〕・金輪〔T19 0120a16〕・水輪〔T19 0120a18〕
  • 洲潬〔T19 0120a20〕:「濕為巨海,乾為洲潬。」〔T19 0120a19〕
  • 世界相續〔T19 0120a24〕:「交妄發生,遞相為種;以是因緣世界相續。」〔T19 0120a23〕
  • 羯囉藍・遏蒱曇〔T19 0120b01〕
  • 胎、卵、濕、化〔T19 0120b01〕:「卵唯想生,胎因情有,濕以合感,化以離應。」〔T19 0120b02〕
  • 眾生相續〔T19 0120b04〕:「情、想、合、離更相變易,所有受業逐其飛沈,以是因緣眾生相續。」〔T19 0120b03〕
  • 欲貪〔T19 0120b06〕・殺貪〔T19 0120b08〕・盜貪〔T19 0120b11〕
  • 業果相續〔T19 0120b14〕:「唯殺、盜、婬三為根本,以是因緣業果相續。」〔T19 0120b13〕
  • 三種相續〔T19 0120b14〕:「如是三種顛倒相續,皆是覺明明了知性,因了發相,從妄見生。」〔T19 0120b14〕又「世間、業果、眾生、三種相續」〔T19 0121b23〕
  • 妙空明覺〔T19 0120b19〕
  • 瞖〔T19 0120b29〕:「亦如瞖人見空中花,瞖病若除,花於空滅。」〔T19 0120b29〕
  • 金鑛〔T19 0120c06〕
  • 空菓〔T19 0120c20〕:「猶邀空花結為空菓」〔T19 0120c20〕
  • 妙覺明心〔T19 0120c21〕:「觀性元真,唯妙覺明,妙覺明心先非水、火」〔T19 0120c21〕
  • 如來藏隨為色空〔T19 0120c29〕:「而如來藏隨為色空,周遍法界」〔T19 0120c29〕
  • 背覺合塵〔T19 0121a02〕:「眾生迷悶背覺合塵」〔T19 0121a02〕
  • 滅塵合覺〔T19 0121a07〕:「滅塵合覺,故發真如妙覺明性。」〔T19 0121a07〕
  • 檀那・尸羅・毘梨耶・羼提・禪那・鉢剌若・波羅蜜多〔T19 0121a13〕:俱非、俱即二列中並出,白話附漢義一次。
  • 怛闥阿竭〔T19 0121a14〕・阿羅訶・三耶三菩〔T19 0121a15〕
  • 俱非・俱即〔T19 0121a16〕:「以是俱非世出世故」〔T19 0121a16〕;「以是即俱世出世故」〔T19 0121a24〕
  • 離即、離非,是即、非即〔T19 0121a25〕:「即如來藏妙明心元,離即、離非,是即、非即。」〔T19 0121a25〕
  • 三有〔T19 0121a26〕
  • 寶覺真心〔T19 0121a29〕
  • 海印〔T19 0121b01〕:「如我按指,海印發光」〔T19 0121b01〕
  • 演若達多〔T19 0121b10〕
  • 魑魅〔T19 0121b11〕
  • 歇即菩提〔T19 0121b25〕:「歇即菩提,勝淨明心本周法界,不從人得」〔T19 0121b25〕
  • 肯綮〔T19 0121b26〕
  • 如意珠〔T19 0121b28〕
  • 拘舍梨〔T19 0121c10〕:卷第二作拘舍離,本卷照底本作拘舍梨。
  • 和合性・本然性〔T19 0121c24〕:「猶如世間諸相雜和成一體者,名和合性;非和合者稱本然性。」〔T19 0121c23〕
  • 無戲論法〔T19 0121c26〕:「本然非然,和合非合,合、然俱離,離、合俱非,此句方名無戲論法。」〔T19 0121c25〕
  • 十二部經〔T19 0121c27〕
  • 阿那含〔T19 0122a02〕・精進林〔T19 0122a03〕
  • 性比丘尼・耶輸陀羅〔T19 0122a07〕
  • 無餘涅槃〔T19 0122a20〕
  • 二決定義〔T19 0122a27〕:「應當先明發覺初心二決定義。」〔T19 0122a27〕
  • 因地發心・果地覺〔T19 0122a29〕:「應當審觀因地發心,與果地覺為同、為異?」〔T19 0122a29〕
  • 五疊渾濁〔T19 0122b09〕:「從始入終,五疊渾濁」〔T19 0122b08〕
  • 劫濁〔T19 0122b15〕:「汝見虛空遍十方界,空見不分。有空無體,有見無覺,相織妄成;是第一重名為劫濁。」〔T19 0122b13〕
  • 見濁〔T19 0122b17〕:「汝身現摶四大為體,見、聞、覺、知壅令留礙,水、火、風、土旋令覺知,相織妄成;是第二重名為見濁。」〔T19 0122b15〕
  • 煩惱濁〔T19 0122b19〕:「又汝心中憶識誦習,性發知見,容現六塵,離塵無相,離覺無性,相織妄成;是第三重名煩惱濁。」〔T19 0122b17〕
  • 眾生濁〔T19 0122b21〕:「又汝朝夕生滅不停,知見每欲留於世間,業運每常遷於國土,相織妄成;是第四重名眾生濁。」〔T19 0122b19〕
  • 命濁〔T19 0122b24〕:「汝等見聞元無異性,眾塵隔越,無狀異生,性中相知,用中相背,同異失準,相織妄成;是第五重名為命濁。」〔T19 0122b21〕
  • 因地心〔T19 0122b27〕:「得元明覺無生滅性,為因地心」〔T19 0122b26〕
  • 客塵煩惱〔T19 0122b29〕・根本無明〔T19 0122c01〕:「清水現前,名為初伏客塵煩惱。去泥純水,名為永斷根本無明。」〔T19 0122b29〕
  • 發業潤生〔T19 0122c05〕
  • 六為賊媒〔T19 0122c10〕:「六為賊媒,自劫家寶」〔T19 0122c10〕
  • 眾生世界〔T19 0122c11〕:「云何名為眾生世界?世為遷流,界為方位。」〔T19 0122c12〕
  • 千二百功德〔T19 0122c20〕:「六根之中,各各功德有千二百。」〔T19 0122c20〕
  • 六受用根〔T19 0123a06〕
  • 六湛圓明〔T19 0123a09〕
  • 一門深入〔T19 0123a13〕:「令汝但於一門深入,入一無妄,彼六知根一時清淨。」〔T19 0123a13〕
  • 須陀洹〔T19 0123a17〕・見所斷〔T19 0123a18〕・修所斷〔T19 0123a19〕・分劑頭數〔T19 0123a20〕
  • 粘湛〔T19 0123b03〕
  • 清淨四大〔T19 0123b04〕:「根元目為清淨四大」〔T19 0123b04〕
  • 六根互相為用〔T19 0123b28〕:「明不循根,寄根明發,由是六根互相為用。」〔T19 0123b28〕
  • 跋難陀龍・殑伽神女〔T19 0123c01〕・驕梵鉢提〔T19 0123c02〕
  • 滅盡定・摩訶迦葉〔T19 0123c04〕
  • 無上知覺〔T19 0123c07〕
  • 七常住果〔T19 0123c20〕:中含菴摩羅識・空如來藏・大圓鏡智〔T19 0123c15〕;「菩提、涅槃、真如、佛性、菴摩羅識、空如來藏、大圓鏡智,是七種名稱謂雖別,清淨圓滿體性堅凝,如金剛王常住不壞。」〔T19 0123c14〕
  • 金剛王〔T19 0123c17〕
  • 湛精圓常〔T19 0123c23〕
  • 擊鍾〔T19 0123c28〕
  • 聞性〔T19 0124a16〕:「若實無聞,聞性已滅同于枯木」〔T19 0124a16〕
  • 性淨妙常〔T19 0124b01〕
  • 真常〔T19 0121b06〕:「若棄生滅,守於真常,常光現前」〔T19 0124b02〕
  • 法眼〔T19 0124b04〕

七、譬喻·修辭

聾人聆蚊蚋:「猶如聾人逾百步外聆於蚊蚋」〔T19 0119c11〕

迷人惑南為北:「譬如迷人,於一聚落惑南為北」〔T19 0120b21〕

瞖人空花:「亦如瞖人見空中花」〔T19 0120b29〕

金鑛精金·木成灰:「又如金鑛雜於精金,其金一純,更不成雜;如木成灰,不重為木」〔T19 0120c06〕

太虛空不拒諸相:「譬如虛空體非群相,而不拒彼諸相發揮。」〔T19 0120c11〕其相七事:「彼太虛空,日照則明,雲屯則暗,風搖則動,霽澄則清,氣凝則濁,土積成霾,水澄成映。」〔T19 0120c13〕

水中日影:「如一水中現於日影,兩人同觀水中之日,東西各行,則各有日隨二人去」〔T19 0120c25〕

琴瑟箜篌琵琶:「譬如琴、瑟、箜篌、琵琶,雖有妙音,若無妙指終不能發。」〔T19 0121a28〕

按指海印:「如我按指,海印發光;汝暫舉心,塵勞先起」〔T19 0121b01〕

演若達多照面:「室羅城中演若達多,忽於晨朝以鏡照面」〔T19 0121b09〕

寤時說夢:「得菩提者,如寤時人、說夢中事」〔T19 0121b19〕

衣中如意珠:「譬如有人,於自衣中、繫如意珠,不自覺知」〔T19 0121b28〕

旅泊華屋:「我今猶如旅泊之人,忽蒙天王賜以華屋。」〔T19 0122a17〕

清水投塵:「譬如清水清潔本然;即彼塵土灰沙之倫,本質留礙」〔T19 0122b09〕下五濁同以『相織妄成;是第N重名為X濁』結(目六)。

澄濁水淨器:「如澄濁水貯於淨器,靜深不動,沙土自沈,清水現前」〔T19 0122b28〕

解結之人:「汝觀世間解結之人,不見所結,云何知解?」〔T19 0122c08〕

六為賊媒:「六為賊媒,自劫家寶」〔T19 0122c10〕

三四四三:「三四、四三,宛轉十二;流變三疊,一、十、百、千。」〔T19 0122c18〕

六根功德:六根同以『當知X根若唯若圓滿若干功德』結:

根結句
眼「當知眼唯八百功德」〔T19 0122c23〕
耳「當知耳根圓滿一千二百功德」〔T19 0122c25〕
鼻「當知鼻唯八百功德」〔T19 0122c27〕
舌「當知舌根圓滿一千二百功德」〔T19 0122c28〕
身「當知身唯八百功德」〔T19 0123a02〕
意「當知意根圓滿一千二百功德」〔T19 0123a04〕

太虛空參合群器:「如太虛空參合群器,由器形異名之異空,除器觀空說空為一。」〔T19 0123a28〕

六根形喻:六根同以『由X、Y等二種相Z,於妙圓中粘湛發W』起,各一形喻:

根形喻
眼「如蒲萄朵」〔T19 0123b05〕
耳「如新卷葉」〔T19 0123b08〕
鼻「如雙垂爪」〔T19 0123b10〕
舌「如初偃月」〔T19 0123b13〕
身「如腰鼓顙」〔T19 0123b16〕
意「如幽室見」〔T19 0123b19〕

六人互用之例:「阿那律陀無目而見;跋難陀龍無耳而聽;殑伽神女非鼻聞香;驕梵鉢提異舌知味」〔T19 0123b29〕;「舜若多神無身有觸,如來光中映令暫現,既為風質,其體元無」〔T19 0123c02〕;「摩訶迦葉,久滅意根,圓明了知不因心念」〔T19 0123c04〕

湯銷氷:「如湯銷氷,應念化成無上知覺」〔T19 0123c07〕

急合眼循體:「如彼世人聚見於眼,若令急合,暗相現前。」〔T19 0123c08〕

擊鍾:「即時如來勅羅睺羅擊鍾一聲」〔T19 0123c27〕下問聞三轉、問聲三轉,各以一問結,佛斥為矯亂。

重睡人聞舂擣:「如重睡人眠熟床枕,其家有人於彼睡時擣練、舂米」〔T19 0124a22〕

八、徵引承衍

子璿《首楞嚴義疏注經》逐節牒釋本卷,判破滿慈執相難性顯如來藏、釋別疑、阿難領悟祈修、如來廣陳修證、別破疑情諸科(目一、目四),本卷科判即承衍於此。

九、校本定位

本卷校記五十八處,並錄不判:

  • 〔T19 0119c21〕「不相𣣋滅」之𣣋:底本此字作𣣋,宋元明本作陵;大正原刊所刊字形與此有別。
  • 〔T19 0119c22〕「唯願如來」之唯:底本此字作唯,麗本、宋本同;大正原刊作惟。
  • 〔T19 0120a07〕「則無所明」之所:底本此字作所,磧砂藏、宋元明本同;大正原刊、麗本作無。
  • 〔T19 0120a18〕「火光上蒸」之蒸:底本此字作蒸,明本作烝。
  • 〔T19 0120b01〕「羯囉藍」之囉:底本此字作囉,宋元明本作羅。
  • 〔T19 0120b11〕「我還汝債」之汝債:底本作汝債,磧砂藏、宋元明本同;大正原刊、麗本作債汝。
  • 〔T19 0120b22〕「因悟所出」之所:底本此字作所,明本作而。
  • 〔T19 0120b29〕「見空中花」之花:底本此字作花,麗本同;大正原刊作華。
  • 〔T19 0120c10〕「不相𣣋滅」之𣣋:底本此字作𣣋;大正原刊所刊字形與此有別。
  • 〔T19 0120c20〕「結為空菓」之菓:底本此字作菓,麗本同;大正原刊作果。
  • 〔T19 0120c21〕「相𣣋滅義」之𣣋:底本此字作𣣋;大正原刊所刊字形與此有別。
  • 〔T19 0121a14〕「非鉢剌若」之鉢:底本此字作鉢,宋元明本作般。
  • 〔T19 0121a22〕「即鉢剌若」之鉢:底本此字作鉢,元本、明本作般。
  • 〔T19 0121a24〕「以是即俱世出世故」之即俱:底本作即俱,宋元明本作俱即。
  • 〔T19 0121c08〕「大目犍連」之犍:底本此字作犍,宋本作揵。
  • 〔T19 0121c11〕「唯垂大悲」之唯:底本此字作唯,麗本、宋本同;大正原刊作惟。
  • 〔T19 0122a01〕「多聞薰習」之薰:底本此字作薰,麗本同;大正原刊作熏。
  • 〔T19 0122a02〕「須待我」之須:底本此字作須,磧砂藏、宋元明本同;大正原刊作因。
  • 〔T19 0122a06〕「銷其愛欲」之銷:底本此字作銷,麗本同;大正原刊作鎖。
  • 〔T19 0122a07〕「羅睺羅母」之羅:底本有此羅字,宋元明本無。
  • 〔T19 0122a18〕「賜以華屋」之以:底本此字作以,宋元明本作與。
  • 〔T19 0122a19〕「畢獲」之畢:底本此字作畢,磧砂藏、宋元明本同;大正原刊、麗本作必。
  • 〔T19 0122a25〕「提心,開無上乘」之提:底本此字作提,宋元明本同;大正原刊作薩。
  • 〔T19 0122b12〕「容貌汩然」之汩:底本此字作汩;大正原刊作汨。
  • 〔T19 0122b12〕「名之為濁」之名:底本此字作名,麗本、磧砂藏同;大正原刊作明。
  • 〔T19 0122b16〕「壅令留礙」之壅:底本此字作壅,麗本作擁。
  • 〔T19 0122b26〕「伏還元覺」之伏:底本此字作伏,明本作復。
  • 〔T19 0122b28〕「貯於淨器」之淨:底本此字作淨,宋元明本作靜。
  • 〔T19 0122c09〕「被汝隳裂」之隳:底本此字作隳,麗本同;大正原刊作墮。
  • 〔T19 0122c09〕「空無相形」之相形:底本作相形,宋元明本作形相。
  • 〔T19 0122c15〕「方位有十」之方位:底本作方位,磧砂藏、宋元明本同;大正原刊作位方。
  • 〔T19 0122c22〕「左、右傍觀」之傍:底本此字作傍,明本作旁。
  • 〔T19 0122c24〕「靜無邊際」之靜:底本此字作靜,麗本同;大正原刊作諍。
  • 〔T19 0122c26〕「驗於鼻根」之鼻:底本此字作鼻,磧砂藏、宋元明本同;大正原刊作耳。
  • 〔T19 0123a01〕「驗於身」之身:底本此字作身,磧砂藏、宋元明本同;大正原刊作舌。
  • 〔T19 0123a03〕「惟聖與凡」之惟:底本此字作惟,宋本作唯。
  • 〔T19 0123a20〕「滅分劑頭數」之劑:底本此字作劑,明本作齊。
  • 〔T19 0123b03〕「粘湛發見」之粘:底本此字作粘,宋元明本作黏。
  • 〔T19 0123b06〕「粘湛發聽」之粘:底本此字作粘,宋元明本作黏。
  • 〔T19 0123b09〕「粘湛發嗅」之粘:底本此字作粘,宋元明本作黏。
  • 〔T19 0123b12〕「粘湛發嘗」之粘:底本此字作粘,宋元明本作黏。
  • 〔T19 0123b15〕「粘湛發覺」之粘:底本此字作粘,宋元明本作黏。
  • 〔T19 0123b15〕「搏觸成根」之搏:底本此字作搏,磧砂藏、宮本、嘉興藏作摶。
  • 〔T19 0123b18〕「粘湛發知」之粘:底本此字作粘,宋元明本作黏。
  • 〔T19 0123b18〕「覽法成根」之覽:底本此字作覽,明本作攬。
  • 〔T19 0123b21〕「粘妄發光」之粘:底本此字作粘,宋元明本作黏。
  • 〔T19 0123b25〕「生滅、暗明」之暗明:底本作暗明,宋元明本作明暗。
  • 〔T19 0123b26〕「脫粘內伏」之粘:底本此字作粘,宋元明本作黏。
  • 〔T19 0123b27〕「諸餘五粘」之粘:底本此字作粘,宋元明本作黏。
  • 〔T19 0123c03〕「無身有觸」之有:底本此字作有,宋元明本作覺。
  • 〔T19 0123c10〕「頭足一辯」之辯:底本此字作辯,宋元明本作辨。
  • 〔T19 0123c17〕「離於暗明」之暗明:底本作暗明,宋元明本作明暗。
  • 〔T19 0123c24〕「唯垂大慈」之唯:底本此字作唯,麗本、宋本同;大正原刊作惟。
  • 〔T19 0124a06〕「阿難、大眾俱言」之大眾俱言:底本作大眾俱言,磧砂藏同;大正原刊作言,宋元明本作大眾俱言有。
  • 〔T19 0124a06〕「有聲」之有:底本有此字,磧砂藏同;大正原刊無。
  • 〔T19 0124a14〕「惟聞與聲」之惟:底本此字作惟,宋本作唯。
  • 〔T19 0124a24〕「或復撞鍾」之復:底本此字作復,元本、明本作為。
  • 〔T19 0124b03〕「塵根、識心」之塵根:底本作塵根,宋元明本作根塵。

卷題與譯署:本卷卷題、一名夾注與譯署一行,大正藏本皆無校記。

字形:本卷罕用字唯「𣣋」三見(〔T19 0119c21〕、〔T19 0120c10〕、〔T19 0120c21〕),照底本錄。「呪」「鍾」「倐」「瞖」「潬」「惓」「囉」「蒱」「菓」「氷」「于」「秖」「粘」諸字皆照底本錄。

十、大正頭注·別本異文

① 本卷頭注與校記凡八十一則:大正頭注三十三則,CBETA 校與之相應者三十三則,CBETA 另增校記十五則(內按語二則)。大正頭注逐字照錄;CBETA 校記與之字差並錄於末欄:

錨注號大正頭注CBETA 校
〔T19 0119c21〕0119009𣣋=陵【三】*𣣋【大】*,陵【宋】*【元】*【明】*
〔T19 0119c22〕0119010惟=唯【宋】唯【CB】【麗-CB】【宋】,惟【大】
〔T19 0120a07〕0120001無=所【三】所【CB】【磧-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,無【大】,無【麗-CB】
〔T19 0120a18〕0120002蒸=烝【明】蒸【大】,烝【明】
〔T19 0120b01〕0120003囉=羅【三】囉【大】,羅【宋】【元】【明】
〔T19 0120b11〕0120004債汝=汝債【三】汝債【CB】【磧-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,債汝【大】,債汝【麗-CB】
〔T19 0120b22〕0120005所=而【明】所【大】,而【明】
〔T19 0120b29〕0120b2901(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)花【CB】【麗-CB】,華【大】
〔T19 0120c10〕0120c1001(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)𣣋【CB】,(大正原刊罕用字形)【大】
〔T19 0120c20〕0120c2001(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)菓【CB】【麗-CB】,果【大】
〔T19 0120c21〕0120c2101(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)𣣋【CB】,(大正原刊罕用字形)【大】
〔T19 0121a11〕0121a1201(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)CBETA 按:前後文均作「非A非B非C,非D、非E、F、G……」句型,此處應是指:「非明、非無明、非明盡、非無明盡」。
〔T19 0121a14〕0121001鉢=般【三】鉢【大】,般【宋】【元】【明】
〔T19 0121a19〕0121a2001(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)CBETA 按:此處應是指:「即明、即無明、即明盡、即無明盡」。
〔T19 0121a22〕0121002鉢=般【元】【明】鉢【大】,般【元】【明】
〔T19 0121a24〕0121003即俱=俱即【三】即俱【大】,俱即【宋】【元】【明】
〔T19 0121c08〕0121004犍=揵【宋】犍【大】,揵【宋】
〔T19 0121c11〕0121005惟=唯【宋】*唯【CB】【麗-CB】【宋】*,惟【大】*
〔T19 0122a01〕0122a0101(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)薰【CB】【麗-CB】,熏【大】
〔T19 0122a02〕0122001因=須【三】須【CB】【磧乙-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,因【大】
〔T19 0122a06〕0122a0601(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)銷【CB】【麗-CB】,鎖【大】
〔T19 0122a07〕0122002〔羅〕-【三】羅【大】,〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
〔T19 0122a18〕0122003以=與【三】以【大】,與【宋】【元】【明】
〔T19 0122a19〕0122004必=畢【三】畢【CB】【磧-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,必【大】,必【麗-CB】
〔T19 0122a25〕0122005薩=提【三】提【CB】【宋】【元】【明】,薩【大】
〔T19 0122b12〕0122b1201(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)汩【CB】,汨【大】
〔T19 0122b12〕0122b1202(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)名【CB】【麗-CB】【磧乙-CB】,明【大】
〔T19 0122b16〕0122b1601(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)壅【大】,擁【麗-CB】
〔T19 0122b26〕0122006伏=復【明】伏【大】,復【明】
〔T19 0122b28〕0122007淨=靜【三】淨【大】,靜【宋】【元】【明】
〔T19 0122c09〕0122008相形=形相【三】相形【大】,形相【宋】【元】【明】
〔T19 0122c09〕0122c0901(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)隳【CB】【麗-CB】,墮【大】
〔T19 0122c15〕0122009位方=方位【三】方位【CB】【磧乙-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,位方【大】
〔T19 0122c22〕0122010傍=旁【明】傍【大】,旁【明】
〔T19 0122c24〕0122c2401(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)靜【CB】【麗-CB】,諍【大】
〔T19 0122c26〕0122011耳=鼻【三】鼻【CB】【磧乙-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,耳【大】
〔T19 0123a01〕0123001舌=身【三】身【CB】【磧乙-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,舌【大】
〔T19 0123a20〕0123002劑=齊【明】劑【大】,齊【明】
〔T19 0123b03〕0123003粘=黏【三】*粘【大】*,黏【宋】*【元】*【明】*
〔T19 0123b15〕0123b1501(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)搏【大】,摶【磧乙-CB】【宮-CB】【嘉興乙-CB】
〔T19 0123b18〕0123004覽=攬【明】覽【大】,攬【明】
〔T19 0123b25〕0123005暗明=明暗【三】*暗明【大】*,明暗【宋】*【元】*【明】*
〔T19 0123c03〕0123006有=覺【三】有【大】,覺【宋】【元】【明】
〔T19 0123c10〕0123007辯=辨【三】辯【大】,辨【宋】【元】【明】
〔T19 0124a06〕0124001言=大眾俱言有【三】大眾俱言【CB】【磧乙-CB】,言【大】,大眾俱言有【宋】【元】【明】
〔T19 0124a06〕0124a0601(CBETA 校記,大正無頭注)有【CB】【磧乙-CB】,〔-〕【大】
〔T19 0124a24〕0124002復=為【元】【明】復【大】,為【元】【明】
〔T19 0124b03〕0124003塵根=根塵【三】塵根【大】,根塵【宋】【元】【明】

表中【三】=宋元明三本,*=同注之字下文再見者同此。

② 大正無別本注。

I. Doctrinal-Outline Placement

This fascicle is divided according to the doctrinal outline of Zixuan of Changshui’s Commentary on the Śūraṅgama Sūtra with Annotated Text; the outline is a guide for reading, not the authority for dividing the text, and the bounds of the unit follow what the base text itself marks by its fascicle titles.

Fascicle Four carries on the meaning of Fascicle Three, that the seven elements are all the tathāgatagarbha, pure and originally so, pervading the dharma-realm, running from the fascicle title to the closing title of the fascicle; the next fascicle begins anew. Zixuan judges Pūrṇa’s question and the Tathāgata’s answer as one major heading: 「二、破滿慈執相難性顯如來藏」—“Second, refuting Pūrṇa’s clinging to appearances in challenging the nature, and disclosing the tathāgatagarbha” 〔T39n1799 0873b05〕 Following Zixuan’s outline this fascicle is divided into eighteen sections; the higher-level headings follow Zixuan word for word:

SectionZixuan’s higher-level headingOutline titleBeginsCharacters
1「二、破滿慈執相難性顯如來藏」—“Second, refuting Pūrṇa’s clinging to appearances in challenging the nature, and disclosing the tathāgatagarbha” 〔T39n1799 0873b05〕The Request · Consent to Expound〔T19 0119c02〕452
2「四、答釋」—“Fourth, answering and explaining” 〔T39n1799 0874b15〕Answering the Doubt about How Appearances Arise from the Nature of the tathāgatagarbha〔T19 0120a02〕170
3「二、辨果相」—“Second, discerning the resultant appearances” 〔T39n1799 0875c17〕Discerning the Resultant Appearances · The Continuity of the World〔T19 0120a12〕215
4「二、辨果相」—“Second, discerning the resultant appearances” 〔T39n1799 0875c17〕The Continuity of Living Beings〔T19 0120a25〕149
5「二、辨果相」—“Second, discerning the resultant appearances” 〔T39n1799 0875c17〕The Continuity of Action and Result〔T19 0120b05〕153
6「一、答藏性生相疑」—“First, answering the doubt about how appearances arise from the nature of the tathāgatagarbha” 〔T39n1799 0874b16〕Concluding the Answer · The Tathāgata Explains by Simile〔T19 0120b14〕391
7「四、答釋」—“Fourth, answering and explaining” 〔T39n1799 0874b15〕Answering the Doubt about the Elements All Pervading〔T19 0120c09〕886
8「二、釋別疑」—“Second, resolving the particular doubts” 〔T39n1799 0880c14〕Resolving Pūrṇa’s Doubt about the Cause of Falsity〔T19 0121b04〕430
9「二、釋別疑」—“Second, resolving the particular doubts” 〔T39n1799 0880c14〕Resolving Ānanda’s Objection about Dependent Arising〔T19 0121c03〕609
10「故此第二、明修行方便」—“therefore this second part, making clear the expedient means of practice” 〔T39n1799 0883b19〕Ānanda Understands and Asks for the Practice · The General Address and Consent to Expound〔T19 0122a10〕284
11「二、別明二義」—“Second, separately making clear the two meanings” 〔T39n1799 0884a22〕The Gate of Sameness and Difference of Cause and Result〔T19 0122a27〕571
12「二、別明二義」—“Second, separately making clear the two meanings” 〔T39n1799 0884a22〕The Gate of the Knotting and Untying of Faculties and Dusts〔T19 0122c03〕153
13「二、根塵結解門」—“Second, the gate of the knotting and untying of faculties and dusts” 〔T39n1799 0885b21〕Separately Showing the Superiority and Inferiority of the Faculties’ Functions〔T19 0122c12〕372
14「二、根塵結解門」—“Second, the gate of the knotting and untying of faculties and dusts” 〔T39n1799 0885b21〕Directing the Choice of the Perfectly Penetrating Faculty for Cultivation and Realization〔T19 0123a05〕446
15「三、令揀圓根修證」—“Third, directing the choice of the perfectly penetrating faculty for cultivation and realization” 〔T39n1799 0886c06〕Expounding at Length the Origin of the Faculties’ Knots · Directly Showing the Gate of Entering the One〔T19 0123b03〕650
16「二、別破疑情」—“Second, separately refuting the doubt” 〔T39n1799 0889a28〕Separately Refuting the Doubt〔T19 0123c13〕199
17「一、真識斷滅疑」—“First, the doubt that true consciousness is annihilated” 〔T39n1799 0889a28〕The Tathāgata Resolves It〔T19 0123c25〕325
18「二、約事廣明」—“Second, making it clear at length by way of an event” 〔T39n1799 0889c07〕Refuting His View of Annihilation by the Nature of Hearing〔T19 0124a15〕341

Section 1 joins Zixuan’s 「一、致請」—“First, the request” 〔T39n1799 0873b05〕 and 「二、許宣」—“Second, consent to expound” 〔T39n1799 0874a23〕 into one section, with the fascicle title and the attribution at its head. Section 2 is the beginning of 「一、答藏性生相疑」—“First, answering the doubt about how appearances arise from the nature of the tathāgatagarbha” 〔T39n1799 0874b16〕. Section 3 begins with the first sentence that Zixuan restates under 「二、辨果相」—“Second, discerning the resultant appearances” 〔T39n1799 0875c17〕, 「由是引起塵勞煩惱」—“From this arise the toils of the dusts and the afflictions” 〔T19 0120a12〕, under which comes first 「一、由因引果」—“First, the cause drawing forth the result” 〔T39n1799 0875c17〕; the opening sentence of the continuity of the world, 「起為世界,靜成虛空」—“Arising, it becomes the world; at rest, it becomes empty space” 〔T19 0120a13〕, lies within this section, and Zixuan places it beneath 「二、正明果相」—“Second, directly making clear the resultant appearances” 〔T39n1799 0876a14〕, under 「一、世界相續」—“First, the continuity of the world” 〔T39n1799 0876a14〕. Sections 4 and 5 are 「二、眾生相續」—“Second, the continuity of living beings” 〔T39n1799 0876c13〕 and 「三、業果相續」—“Third, the continuity of action and result” 〔T39n1799 0877b10〕. Section 6 joins 「二、結答」—“Second, concluding the answer” 〔T39n1799 0877c05〕 and 「二、如來喻釋」—“Second, the Tathāgata explains by simile” 〔T39n1799 0877c23〕, beginning with 「富樓那!如是三種顛倒相續」—“Pūrṇa! These three kinds of inverted continuity” 〔T19 0120b14〕. Section 7 is 「二、答大性俱遍疑」—“Second, answering the doubt about the elements all pervading” 〔T39n1799 0878c10〕. Sections 8 and 9 are 「一、釋滿慈疑妄因」—“First, resolving Pūrṇa’s doubt about the cause of falsity” 〔T39n1799 0880c15〕 and 「二、釋慶喜難緣起」—“Second, resolving Ānanda’s objection about dependent arising” 〔T39n1799 0882a15〕. Section 10 joins 「一、阿難領悟祈修」—“First, Ānanda understands and asks for the practice” 〔T39n1799 0883b20〕 and, beneath 「二、如來廣陳修證」—“Second, the Tathāgata sets forth cultivation and realization at length” 〔T39n1799 0883c27〕, 「一、總告許宣」—“First, the general address and consent to expound” 〔T39n1799 0883c27〕. Section 11 is 「一、因果同異門」—“First, the gate of sameness and difference of cause and result” 〔T39n1799 0884a23〕, beginning with 「云何初心二義決定?」—“What are the two decisive meanings of the initial mind?” 〔T19 0122a27〕; Section 12 is the beginning of 「二、根塵結解門」—“Second, the gate of the knotting and untying of faculties and dusts” 〔T39n1799 0885b21〕. Section 13 is 「二、別示根用優劣」—“Second, separately showing the superiority and inferiority of the faculties’ functions” 〔T39n1799 0885c21〕, beginning with 「阿難!云何名為眾生世界?」—“Ānanda! What is called the world of living beings?” 〔T19 0122c12〕; Section 14 is 「三、令揀圓根修證」—“Third, directing the choice of the perfectly penetrating faculty for cultivation and realization” 〔T39n1799 0886c06〕, beginning with 「阿難!汝今欲逆生死欲流」—“Ānanda! If you now wish to go against the flow of desire of birth and death” 〔T19 0123a05〕. Section 15 joins 「二、廣明根結之由」—“Second, expounding at length the origin of the faculties’ knots” 〔T39n1799 0887b29〕 and 「三、正示入一之門」—“Third, directly showing the gate of entering the one” 〔T39n1799 0888a29〕, beginning with 「由明、暗等二種相形」—“Because of the two kinds of appearances, brightness and darkness, shaping each other” 〔T19 0123b03〕. Section 16 is, beneath 「二、別破疑情」—“Second, separately refuting the doubt” 〔T39n1799 0889a28〕 and 「一、真識斷滅疑」—“First, the doubt that true consciousness is annihilated” 〔T39n1799 0889a28〕, the part 「一、阿難伸疑」—“First, Ānanda states his doubt” 〔T39n1799 0889a29〕. Section 17 is 「二、如來為斷」—“Second, the Tathāgata resolves it” 〔T39n1799 0889b29〕, and the striking of the bell lies beneath it in 「二、約事廣明」—“Second, making it clear at length by way of an event” 〔T39n1799 0889c07〕. Section 18 is 「二、就聞性破其斷見」—“Second, refuting his view of annihilation by the nature of hearing” 〔T39n1799 0890a12〕, beginning with 「阿難!聲銷無響」—“Ānanda! When the sound fades and there is no echo” 〔T19 0124a15〕.

Speakers: in Section 1 Pūrṇa makes the request: 「爾時,富樓那彌多羅尼子在大眾中即從座起」—“At that time Pūrṇa Maitrāyaṇīputra, in the midst of the great assembly, rose at once from his seat” 〔T19 0119c07〕; the Buddha consents to expound: 「爾時,世尊告富樓那及諸會中漏盡無學諸阿羅漢」—“At that time the World-Honored One said to Pūrṇa and to all the arhats in the assembly whose outflows were exhausted, beyond training” 〔T19 0119c25〕. In Section 2 the Buddha restates Pūrṇa’s question, 「清淨本然,云何忽生山河大地?」—“Pure and originally so—why do there suddenly arise mountains, rivers, and the great earth?” 〔T19 0120a02〕, and the Buddha and Pūrṇa go back and forth in question and answer five times; from there to 「因此虛妄,終而復始」—“because of this falsity, they end and begin again” 〔T19 0120b16〕 in Section 6 is the Buddha’s long answer. Pūrṇa asks again, 「如來今得妙空明覺,山河大地有為習漏何當復生?」—“now that the Tathāgata has attained the wondrous, empty, bright awakening, when will mountains, rivers, the great earth, and the conditioned habits and outflows arise again?” 〔T19 0120b19〕; in the simile of the confused man the Buddha asks and Pūrṇa answers, and 「不也。世尊!」—“No, World-Honored One!” 〔T19 0120b26〕, which names no speaker, is Pūrṇa’s answer to the Buddha. In Section 7 the Buddha restates Pūrṇa’s question, 「地、水、火、風本性圓融周遍法界」—“earth, water, fire, and wind are by nature perfectly interfused, pervading the dharma-realm” 〔T19 0120c09〕, and answers at length up to 「得少為足」—“content with a little attainment” 〔T19 0121b03〕. In Section 8 Pūrṇa asks about the cause of falsity; to the question about Yajñadatta Pūrṇa answers 「是人心狂,更無他故」—“This man’s mind was mad; there is no other reason” 〔T19 0121b14〕, and below this is the Buddha’s long answer. In Section 9 Ānanda restates the Buddha’s words, 「殺、盜、婬業三緣斷故,三因不生」—“When the three conditions of the actions of killing, stealing, and lust are cut off, the three causes are not born” 〔T19 0121c04〕, and states his doubt; from 「佛告阿難」—“The Buddha said to Ānanda” 〔T19 0121c12〕 on is the Buddha’s answer. In Section 10 Ānanda understands and asks for the practice; the World-Honored One 「宣示阿難及諸大眾」—“proclaimed to Ānanda and all the great assembly” 〔T19 0122a25〕, and speaks of the two decisive meanings at length up to 「彼六知根一時清淨」—“those six knowing faculties are at once purified” 〔T19 0123a14〕. In Section 14 Ānanda asks about entering deeply by one gate, and within the Buddha’s answer comes Ānanda’s one sentence 「我用耳聞」—“I hear with my ears” 〔T19 0123a24〕. In Section 16 Ānanda states his doubt about annihilation. In Section 17 the Buddha speaks to Ānanda; from 「勅羅睺羅擊鍾一聲」—“commanded Rāhula to strike the bell once” 〔T19 0123c28〕 on, the Buddha asks and Ānanda and the great assembly answer, nineteen exchanges in all; from the Buddha’s 「我問汝聞,汝則言聞」—“When I ask you about hearing, you speak of hearing” 〔T19 0124a13〕 on, he speaks at length, to the end of the fascicle in Section 18.

The fascicle title and the interlinear note on its other name, word for word: 「大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經卷第四〔一名中印度那蘭陀大道場經,於灌頂部錄出別行〕」—“The Great Buddha-Crown Sūtra of the Tathāgata’s Secret Cause, Cultivation and Realization of the Complete Meaning, and the Myriad Practices of All Bodhisattvas, Called Śūraṅgama, Fascicle Four [also called the Great Bodhimaṇḍa Sūtra of Nālandā in Central India, copied out from the Consecration Section to circulate separately]” 〔T19 0119c02〕.

The single line of the translator’s attribution, word for word: 「唐天竺沙門般剌蜜帝譯」—“Translated by the śramaṇa Pramiti of India, of the Tang.” 〔T19 0119c06〕. 「般剌蜜帝」—“Pramiti” is recorded as in the base text.

The closing title of the fascicle, word for word: 「大佛頂萬行首楞嚴經卷第四」—“The Great Buddha-Crown Sūtra of the Myriad Practices, Śūraṅgama, Fascicle Four” 〔T19 0124b06〕.

This fascicle has no verse. 「佛頂神呪」—“the Buddha-crown divine spell” 〔T19 0122a02〕 and 「神呪力」—“the power of the divine spell” 〔T19 0122a06〕 are words within the sūtra, not a passage of spell text. The main text of Fascicle Four, together with the fascicle title, the attribution, and the closing title, totals six thousand seven hundred and ninety-six characters.

II. Collation with the Alternate Translations

This sūtra has only one Chinese translation and no alternate translation; the Taishō has no notes from other recensions.

III. Scriptural and Treatise Grounding (the “eye”)

The sūtras and treatises Zixuan cites on this fascicle are recorded word for word, in order of section:

  • Section 1: Zixuan cites the Treatise Conforming to Correct Principle: 「或有於境,智不及愚。所謂凡夫善通三藏,羅漢不識赤鹽。」—“With regard to some objects, the wise do not match the foolish: thus an ordinary person may be well versed in the three baskets, while an arhat does not recognize red salt.” 〔T39n1799 0873c03〕 He also cites the Nirvāṇa Sūtra: 「我於餘經說有聲聞不得作佛,非於此經作如是說。」—“In other sūtras I said that there are śrāvakas who cannot become buddhas; it is not in this sūtra that I speak so.” 〔T39n1799 0874b07〕
  • Section 2: Zixuan cites the Perfect Awakening: 「一切覺故,圓覺普照,寂滅無二。」—“Because all is awakening, perfect awakening shines universally, quiescent and without duality.” 〔T39n1799 0874c08〕 He also cites the verse on the path of seeing: 「若時於所緣,智都無所得,爾時住唯識,離二取相故。」—“When, with regard to the object, wisdom obtains nothing at all, then one abides in consciousness-only, because one is apart from the marks of the two graspings.” 〔T39n1799 0875a07〕 He also cites a sūtra: 「不了心及緣,則生二妄想;了心及境界,妄想則不生。」—“Not understanding the mind and its conditions, the two false thoughts arise; understanding the mind and its objects, false thought does not arise.” 〔T39n1799 0875a08〕 He also cites the Awakening of Faith: 「由不如實知真如法一故,不覺心起而有於念。」—“Because one does not know as it truly is that the dharma of suchness is one, the unawakened mind arises and there is thought.” 〔T39n1799 0875a27〕 He also cites the Necklace Sūtra: 「四住地前更無法起。」—“Before the four abodes there is no further dharma that arises.” 〔T39n1799 0875b03〕
  • Section 3: Zixuan cites the Awakening of Faith: 「以有境界緣故,復生六種相。」—“Because there are objects as conditions, six kinds of appearances further arise.” 〔T39n1799 0875c24〕
  • Section 6: Zixuan cites the Vimalakīrti: 「佛為增上慢人說離婬怒癡;若無增上慢,佛說婬怒癡性即是解脫。」—“For those of overweening pride the Buddha teaches leaving lust, anger, and delusion; for those without overweening pride, the Buddha teaches that the nature of lust, anger, and delusion is itself liberation.” 〔T39n1799 0878b11〕
  • Section 7: Zixuan cites the Sūtra of Perfect Awakening: 「但諸聲聞所圓境界,身心語言皆悉斷滅,終不能至彼之親證所現涅槃」—“As for the realm the śrāvakas have perfected: body, mind, and speech are all cut off and extinguished, yet they can never reach the nirvāṇa manifested in that personal realization” 〔T39n1799 0880b21〕 He also cites the Great Collection Sūtra: 「閻浮所有色像,大海皆有印文」—“Of all the forms and images in Jambudvīpa, the great ocean bears the seal-print of each” 〔T39n1799 0880c09〕
  • Section 8: Zixuan cites the Awakening of Faith: 「覺心初起,心無初相。」—“Awakening to the mind’s first arising, the mind has no first mark.” 〔T39n1799 0881b21〕 He also cites it: 「所言覺義者,謂心體離念,離念相者等虛空界,無所不遍,法界一相,即是如來平等法身,依此法身說名本覺。」—“What is called the meaning of awakening is that the substance of the mind is free of thought; the mark of freedom from thought is equal to the realm of empty space, pervading everywhere; the one mark of the dharma-realm is the equal Dharma body of the Tathāgata, and on the basis of this Dharma body it is called original awakening.” 〔T39n1799 0881c14〕
  • Section 9: Zixuan cites the Perfect Awakening: 「有照有覺俱名障礙,是故菩薩常覺不住,照與照者同時寂滅。」—“Having illumination and having awareness are both called obstruction; therefore the bodhisattva is ever aware without abiding, and illumination and the illuminer are quiescent at the same time.” 〔T39n1799 0882c10〕 He also cites it: 「種種取捨皆是輪迴,未出輪迴而辨圓覺,彼圓覺性即同流轉,若免輪迴無有是處。」—“All kinds of grasping and rejecting are the cycle of rebirth; to discern perfect awakening before leaving the cycle of rebirth makes the nature of perfect awakening share in the flowing round; that one so escapes the cycle of rebirth is impossible.” 〔T39n1799 0883a12〕
  • Section 10: Zixuan cites the Avataṃsaka: 「譬如有力王,率土咸戴仰,止觀亦如是,一切所依賴。」—“Just as a mighty king is upheld and revered throughout his land, so too stopping and contemplation are what all things rely on.” 〔T39n1799 0884a11〕 He also cites the Awakening of Faith: 「所言止者,謂止一切境界相,隨順奢摩他觀義故。」—“What is called stopping means stopping all the marks of objects, because it accords with the meaning of śamatha contemplation.” 〔T39n1799 0884a15〕
  • Section 11: Zixuan cites the Vimalakīrti: 「無以生滅心行說實相法。」—“Do not use the workings of the arising-and-perishing mind to speak the dharma of true reality.” 〔T39n1799 0884b05〕 He also cites the Samantabhadra Contemplation Sūtra: 「大乘因者諸法實相,大乘果者亦諸法實相。」—“The cause of the Great Vehicle is the true reality of all dharmas; the result of the Great Vehicle is also the true reality of all dharmas.” 〔T39n1799 0884b07〕 He also relies on the Treatise on the Lotus in saying: 「日月歲年總名為劫,乃至成住壞空不離時分。」—“Days, months, and years are all called kalpas, and so on up to formation, abiding, destruction, and emptiness, none apart from divisions of time.” 〔T39n1799 0884c10〕
  • Section 12: Zixuan cites the Nirvāṇa: 「六入空聚,當有六大惡賊必斷汝命,當即遠離。」—“The six entrances are an empty village; there will be six great evil bandits who will surely cut off your life; you should leave it far behind at once.” 〔T39n1799 0885c18〕
  • Section 14: Zixuan cites the Aṅgulimāla Sūtra: 「所謂彼眼根,於諸如來常,具足無減修,了了分明見。」—“That is to say, that eye-faculty, permanent in all the Tathāgatas, is cultivated complete and undiminished, seeing clearly and distinctly.” 〔T39n1799 0887a03〕 He also cites the Prajñā: 「須陀洹名為入流,而無所入,不入色聲香味觸法。」—“Srota-āpanna is called entering the stream, yet there is nothing entered: one does not enter form, sound, scent, taste, touch, or dharmas.” 〔T39n1799 0887b18〕
  • Section 15: Zixuan cites the Laṅkāvatāra: 「不了心及緣,則生二妄想,了心及境界,妄想則不生。」—“Not understanding the mind and its conditions, the two false thoughts arise; understanding the mind and its objects, false thought does not arise.” 〔T39n1799 0888b08〕 He also cites the Perfect Awakening: 「無知覺明不依諸礙」—“the bright awareness without knowing does not rely on any obstruction” 〔T39n1799 0888b16〕 He also cites the Vimalakīrti: 「不起滅定而現諸威儀」—“without rising from the samādhi of cessation, manifesting all the deportments” 〔T39n1799 0888c24〕

In Sections 4, 5, 13, 16, 17, and 18 Zixuan cites no sūtras or treatises in his commentary. Of what is cited in Section 2, Zixuan titles the verse only 「見道偈」—“the verse on the path of seeing,” and does not name the sūtra he cites; both are recorded as they are. In Section 8 Zixuan also cites the Zhuangzi to explain the joints and sinews; this is not a sūtra or treatise, and is recorded in IV.

IV. Essentials of the Commentary on This Passage

Zixuan’s essentials, section by section, recorded word for word; Zixuan often cites the sūtra in abbreviated form as ‘… to …’, and the sūtra text is not supplied here.

Section 1 · The Request · Consent to Expound Zixuan says: 「如來藏心不空不有、即性即相,名第一義。」—“The tathāgatagarbha mind is neither empty nor existent, at once the nature and at once the appearances; this is called the foremost meaning.” 〔T39n1799 0873b12〕 Explaining the nature of true supreme meaning, Zixuan says: 「如來常依二諦說法,謂世俗諦、勝義諦。今所說者異乎常說,謂勝義勝義諦也。」—“The Tathāgata always teaches the Dharma according to the two truths, namely the conventional truth and the truth of supreme meaning. What is taught now differs from the usual teaching: it is the truth of supreme meaning within supreme meaning.” 〔T39n1799 0874a27〕 Explaining the fixed-nature śrāvakas, Zixuan says: 「方便教說定性二乘、無性闡提不得成佛,如焦芽敗種等。今此會通,咸歸一乘,究竟涅槃。」—“The expedient teaching says that the fixed-nature two vehicles and the icchantikas without the nature cannot become buddhas, like scorched sprouts and spoiled seeds. Here they are reconciled: all return to the One Vehicle and the ultimate nirvāṇa.” 〔T39n1799 0874b05〕 He also says: 「阿練若,云無諠雜。」—“Araṇya means without noise and bustle.” 〔T39n1799 0874b11〕

Section 2 · Answering the Doubt about How Appearances Arise from the Nature of the tathāgatagarbha Zixuan says: 「一真如心是佛常說,或名法界、或名實相、或如來藏性、或妙淨明心。」—“The one mind of suchness is what the Buddha always teaches; it is called the dharma-realm, or true reality, or the nature of the tathāgatagarbha, or the wondrous pure bright mind.” 〔T39n1799 0874b20〕 Explaining ‘the nature-awakening is wondrously bright’ and ‘the original awakening is brightly wondrous,’ Zixuan says: 「性覺、本覺指體也。妙明、明妙,顯用也。」—“Nature-awakening and original awakening point to the substance. Wondrously bright and brightly wondrous disclose the function.” 〔T39n1799 0874b29〕 He also says: 「夫真覺者,離能所相。」—“True awakening is apart from the marks of subject and object.” 〔T39n1799 0875a06〕 Explaining ‘the nature-awakening is necessarily bright; falsely it is taken as a bright awakening,’ Zixuan says: 「上句結真,下句結妄。」—“The first phrase concludes the true; the second phrase concludes the false.” 〔T39n1799 0875a17〕 He also says: 「性覺必有真明,故云性覺妙明、本覺明妙。」—“The nature-awakening necessarily has true brightness; therefore it is said that the nature-awakening is wondrously bright and the original awakening is brightly wondrous.” 〔T39n1799 0875a18〕

Section 3 · Discerning the Resultant Appearances · The Continuity of the World Zixuan says: 「由前三細引起四麁,謂智相相續,執取計名也。」—“The three subtle marks before draw forth four of the coarse ones, namely the mark of discernment, continuity, grasping, and the calculation of names.” 〔T39n1799 0875c19〕 Explaining the name of the world, Zixuan says: 「世為遷流,界為方位,前後改轉隔別不同,故名世界」—“‘World’ is flowing passage and ‘realm’ is direction and position; before and after change and turn, separated and not the same; therefore it is called the world” 〔T39n1799 0875c28〕 Explaining the wind-wheel, Zixuan says: 「是故世界之初風輪為始,虛空即為世界所依。」—“Therefore at the beginning of the world the wind-wheel comes first, and empty space is what the world relies on.” 〔T39n1799 0876a22〕 Explaining continents and sandbanks, Zixuan says: 「水中可居曰洲,水中沙聚曰潬。」—“A place in the water where one can dwell is called a continent; sand gathered in the water is called a sandbank.” 〔T39n1799 0876b26〕 Concluding the continuity of the world, Zixuan says: 「外相雖爾,皆由內心;內心無變,外豈差別?」—“Though the outer appearances are so, all come from the inner mind; if the inner mind did not change, how could the outer differ?” 〔T39n1799 0876c11〕

Section 4 · The Continuity of Living Beings Explaining ‘the falsity of brightening is nothing other: awakened brightness itself is the fault,’ Zixuan says: 「明謂顯發,妄之顯發別非他緣,但由自己一念不了,能所妄分,以為過咎」—“Brightening means bringing forth; the bringing forth of falsity has no other condition; it is only that one’s own single thought does not understand, and subject and object are falsely divided; this is the fault” 〔T39n1799 0876c16〕 Explaining ‘those of the same action bind one another,’ Zixuan says: 「胎、卵有情要因父母同業相感,故云同業相纏。」—“Mother-born and egg-born sentient beings must, through the father and mother, respond to one another by the same action; therefore it says ‘those of the same action bind one another.’” 〔T39n1799 0877a01〕 He also says: 「羯羅藍,云凝滑。」—“Kalala means congealed and slippery.” 〔T39n1799 0877a21〕 Concluding the continuity of living beings, Zixuan says: 「捨身受身無能斷絕,故云眾生相續。」—“Leaving one body and receiving another, it cannot be cut off; therefore it is called the continuity of living beings.” 〔T39n1799 0877b09〕

Section 5 · The Continuity of Action and Result Explaining the greed of desire, Zixuan says: 「愛欲情深互相纏縛,結滯難捨,故云不離。」—“The feeling of love and desire is deep and they bind one another; knotted and stuck, it is hard to let go; therefore it says ‘cannot part.’” 〔T39n1799 0877b13〕 Explaining the greed of killing, Zixuan says: 「為貪故殺,用滋我命。」—“One kills out of greed, to nourish one’s own life.” 〔T39n1799 0877b18〕 Explaining the greed of stealing, Zixuan says: 「不與而取,故名為盜。今非理食他,即奪其命也。」—“Taking what is not given is therefore called stealing. Here, wrongfully eating another is robbing it of its life.” 〔T39n1799 0877b23〕 Concluding the continuity of action and result, Zixuan says: 「殺、盜、婬三正是業道,皆由貪愛以之為緣,故此三種皆云貪也。」—“Killing, stealing, and lust, these three, are precisely the paths of action; all have greed and love as their condition; therefore all three are called greed.” 〔T39n1799 0877c03〕

Section 6 · Concluding the Answer · The Tathāgata Explains by Simile Explaining ‘awakened brightness, the nature of clear knowing,’ Zixuan says: 「覺明妙體本有明了知性,即性覺妙明也。」—“The wondrous substance of awakened brightness originally has the nature of clear knowing; this is the nature-awakening being wondrously bright.” 〔T39n1799 0877c08〕 Explaining the simile of losing one’s way, Zixuan says: 「迷人,眾生也。聚落,如來藏也。」—“The confused man is beings. The village is the tathāgatagarbha.” 〔T39n1799 0878a08〕 Explaining the simile of wood becoming ash, Zixuan says: 「覺性如地,惑障如木,加行如燧,智照如火,涅槃如灰。」—“The nature of awakening is like the ground, the obstruction of delusion like wood, applied practice like the fire-drill, the illumination of wisdom like fire, and nirvāṇa like ash.” 〔T39n1799 0878b20〕 He also says: 「菩提智果,涅槃斷果,雙合二喻也。」—“Bodhi, the fruit of wisdom, and nirvāṇa, the fruit of cutting off, together match the two similes.” 〔T39n1799 0878b24〕

Section 7 · Answering the Doubt about the Elements All Pervading Zixuan says: 「虛空,藏性也。群相,七大也。」—“Empty space is the nature of the tathāgatagarbha. The many appearances are the seven elements.” 〔T39n1799 0878c18〕 He also says: 「七大性真,元如來藏。」—“The nature of the seven elements is true, originally the tathāgatagarbha.” 〔T39n1799 0879a13〕 Explaining ‘neither of them all,’ Zixuan says: 「此上總非諸相者,即約真如門,顯真諦義一切皆空」—“The foregoing general negation of all appearances is in terms of the gate of suchness, disclosing the meaning of the true truth, that all is empty” 〔T39n1799 0880a05〕 Explaining ‘each and every one of them,’ Zixuan says: 「前約真如不變絕相,此約隨緣成生滅門,顯俗諦也。」—“The former was in terms of suchness, unchanging and beyond appearances; this is in terms of according with conditions and forming the gate of arising and perishing, disclosing the conventional truth.” 〔T39n1799 0880a24〕 Explaining ‘apart from is, apart from is not; it is is, and it is not is,’ Zixuan says: 「此約二門不二,唯是一心。雙遮真俗,故曰離即離非;雙照真俗,故云是即非即。三諦一體,是故皆云即如來藏。」—“This is in terms of the two gates being not two, only the one mind. Negating both the true and the conventional, it says ‘apart from is, apart from is not’; illumining both the true and the conventional, it says ‘it is is, and it is not is.’ The three truths are one substance; therefore all are said to be the tathāgatagarbha.” 〔T39n1799 0880b01〕 Explaining the simile of the qin and the se, Zixuan says: 「琴等,眾生也。妙音,藏性也。妙指,實智也。」—“The qin and the others are beings. The wondrous sound is the nature of the tathāgatagarbha. The wondrous fingers are real wisdom.” 〔T39n1799 0880b28〕 He also says: 「無上覺道如寶所,小乘涅槃如化城。」—“The unsurpassed path of awakening is like the place of treasure; the nirvāṇa of the Lesser Vehicle is like the conjured city.” 〔T39n1799 0880c13〕

Section 8 · Resolving Pūrṇa’s Doubt about the Cause of Falsity Zixuan says: 「障盡者必知妄始,故此問也。」—“One whose obstructions are exhausted must know the beginning of falsity; therefore he asks this.” 〔T39n1799 0880c22〕 Explaining Yajñadatta, Zixuan says: 「演若達多,此云祠授。」—“Yajñadatta here means Given by Sacrifice.” 〔T39n1799 0881a08〕 He also says: 「魑魅,山澤之怪也。」—“A mountain-demon is an uncanny being of the mountains and marshes.” 〔T39n1799 0881a13〕 Explaining that falsity has no cause, Zixuan says: 「直明妄無因也。妄必無因,有因不妄,妄之一字甚好思量。」—“This directly makes clear that falsity has no cause. Falsity necessarily has no cause; what has a cause is not false; the single word ‘falsity’ is well worth pondering.” 〔T39n1799 0881a21〕 Explaining the three conditions and the three causes, Zixuan says: 「煩惱為緣,能潤業故。殺等為因,正是業故。」—“The afflictions are the conditions, because they moisten action. Killing and the rest are the causes, because they are action itself.” 〔T39n1799 0881c03〕 Explaining ‘when it stops, that is bodhi,’ Zixuan says: 「分別不生,前後際斷,故名為歇。」—“Discrimination does not arise and the bounds of before and after are cut off; therefore it is called ceasing.” 〔T39n1799 0881c13〕 Explaining the joints and sinews, Zixuan says: 「言肯綮者,骨邊細肉也。」—“What is called the joints and sinews is the fine flesh beside the bone.” 〔T39n1799 0881c21〕 He also cites the Zhuangzi: 「經肯綮之未甞,而況大觚乎。」—“He has never touched even the joints and sinews, much less a great bone!” 〔T39n1799 0881c22〕 Explaining the simile of the jewel in the garment, Zixuan says: 「《法華》中亦有此喻,彼約結緣,此約本有,意不同耳。」—“The Lotus also has this simile; there it is in terms of forming a connection, here in terms of what is originally possessed; the intent is not the same.” 〔T39n1799 0882a07〕

Section 9 · Resolving Ānanda’s Objection about Dependent Arising Zixuan says: 「老梵志者,竝是年長。」—“The old brahmins were all advanced in years.” 〔T39n1799 0882a27〕 He also says: 「因緣、自然依假建立,菩提真性眾相都亡」—“Causes and conditions and spontaneity are established provisionally; in the true nature of bodhi all appearances vanish” 〔T39n1799 0882b02〕 Explaining ‘the bodhi mind arising and the arising-and-perishing mind perishing,’ Zixuan says: 「若有執言真心可得、分別可亡,斯則菩提心生、生滅心滅,但是生滅,無菩提生;無生滅滅,方無功用。」—“If one clings, saying that the true mind can be attained and discrimination can be made to vanish, this is the bodhi mind arising and the arising-and-perishing mind perishing; it is only arising and perishing; only when there is no arising of bodhi and no perishing of arising and perishing is it effortless.” 〔T39n1799 0882c08〕 Explaining ‘what is originally so’ and ‘union,’ Zixuan says: 「本然,自然也。和合,因緣也。二皆不立,故云俱離。此離亦離,故云俱非。」—“What is originally so is spontaneity. Union is causes and conditions. Neither is set up; therefore it says both are left behind. This leaving is itself left; therefore it says both are negated.” 〔T39n1799 0882c28〕 Explaining ‘cultivating action without outflows for a single day,’ Zixuan says: 「應知理觀兼修,定慧雙運,豈但辨義說文而已哉!」—“One should know that contemplation of principle is cultivated together with it, samādhi and wisdom working as a pair; how could it be merely discerning meanings and expounding texts!” 〔T39n1799 0883a21〕 Explaining the bhikṣuṇī Prakṛti, Zixuan says: 「過去為婆羅門女,名為本性,今從昔號名性比丘尼。耶輸陀羅,云華色。」—“In the past she was a brahmin woman named Original Nature; now, following her former name, she is called the bhikṣuṇī Nature. Yaśodharā means Flower-Color.” 〔T39n1799 0883b07〕

Section 10 · Ānanda Understands and Asks for the Practice · The General Address and Consent to Expound Zixuan says: 「超過一切世出世間,故云無上。」—“Surpassing all that is worldly and world-transcending; therefore it is called unsurpassed.” 〔T39n1799 0883c02〕 Explaining the simile of the traveler and the splendid house, Zixuan says: 「天王,佛也。賜與,開示也。華屋,藏體也。雖獲,信解也。門入,修行也。」—“The heavenly king is the Buddha. The gift is the opening and showing. The splendid house is the substance of the tathāgatagarbha. ‘Although he has obtained’ is faith and understanding. Entering by the gate is practice.” 〔T39n1799 0883c14〕 He also says: 「捐棄,畢盡也。疇昔,往日也。無餘者,無明永盡,二死已亡,究竟之無餘也。」—“Casting off means bringing to an end. ‘Past’ means former days. Without remainder means that ignorance is forever exhausted and the two kinds of death have already vanished: the ultimate absence of remainder.” 〔T39n1799 0883c20〕 Explaining the wondrous samādhi, Zixuan says: 「妙三摩提首楞嚴定,即真如觀。」—“The wondrous samādhi, the Śūraṅgama samādhi, is the contemplation of suchness.” 〔T39n1799 0884a07〕 Explaining the two decisive meanings, Zixuan says: 「一者審觀因地及與果心,起隨順行,即依真如門修止也。」—“The first is carefully contemplating the stage of cause together with the mind of the result, giving rise to the practice of according; this is cultivating stopping on the basis of the gate of suchness.” 〔T39n1799 0884a13〕 He also says: 「二者審觀煩惱結解根元,起對治行,即依生滅門修觀也。」—“The second is carefully contemplating the root of the knotting and untying of the afflictions, giving rise to the practice of counteracting; this is cultivating contemplation on the basis of the gate of arising and perishing.” 〔T39n1799 0884a16〕

Section 11 · The Gate of Sameness and Difference of Cause and Result Zixuan says: 「既能信解果海無念,絕名離相,本非生滅。」—“Being able to have faith and understanding that the ocean of the result is without thought, beyond names and apart from appearances, originally not arising and perishing.” 〔T39n1799 0884a27〕 Explaining the dharmas that can be made and empty space, Zixuan says: 「妄心如器界,所作性故。真心如虛空,理無為故。」—“The false mind is like the container world, because its nature is to be made. The true mind is like empty space, because in principle it is unconditioned.” 〔T39n1799 0884b15〕 Explaining the turbidity of the kalpa, Zixuan says: 「梵云劫波,此云時分。」—“The Sanskrit is kalpa, which here means a division of time.” 〔T39n1799 0884c10〕 He also says: 「一念初起無明之始,時之初分,故名為劫,非劫末時之劫濁也。」—“The first arising of a single thought, the beginning of ignorance, is the first division of time; therefore it is called the kalpa; it is not the turbidity of the kalpa at the kalpa’s end.” 〔T39n1799 0884c17〕 Explaining the turbidity of views, Zixuan says: 「身之質礙,由見聞知織水火風」—“The obstructive substance of the body comes from seeing, hearing, and knowing being woven together with water, fire, and wind” 〔T39n1799 0884c21〕 Explaining the turbidity of afflictions, Zixuan says: 「六識分別三世遍緣,憶過去境,識現在塵,誦習未來諸有境界。」—“The six consciousnesses discriminate, taking all three times as conditions: remembering past objects, recognizing present dusts, and reciting and practicing all future objects of existence.” 〔T39n1799 0884c28〕 Explaining the turbidity of living beings, Zixuan says: 「生滅是行,行即是業」—“Arising and perishing are formations, and formations are action” 〔T39n1799 0885a07〕 Explaining the turbidity of life, Zixuan says: 「命是報法,依業所引。」—“Life is a dharma of retribution, drawn forth by action.” 〔T39n1799 0885a13〕 Explaining the simile of clarifying turbid water, Zixuan says: 「真覺如水,見聞如濁,定身如靜器,定法如澄靜。砂如煩惱,泥如無明,地前名伏,地上名斷,究竟名精純,變現即起用。」—“True awakening is like the water, seeing and hearing like the turbidity, the body of samādhi like the still vessel, the method of samādhi like settling and stilling. The sand is like the afflictions and the mud like ignorance; before the grounds it is called subduing, on the grounds it is called cutting off, at the ultimate it is called essential purity, and transformation and manifestation are the giving rise of function.” 〔T39n1799 0885b16〕

Section 12 · The Gate of the Knotting and Untying of Faculties and Dusts Zixuan says: 「前第一義令止妄心,伏還元覺,即是修止。此第二義,令審詳煩惱,觀察對治,即是修觀。先止後觀,法應如是。」—“The first meaning before had one stop the false mind, subdue it, and return to the original awakening: this is cultivating stopping. This second meaning has one carefully examine the afflictions, observe them, and counteract them: this is cultivating contemplation. First stopping, then contemplation: the method ought to be so.” 〔T39n1799 0885b25〕 Explaining ‘giving rise to action and moistening birth’ and ‘who makes and who receives,’ Zixuan says: 「無明發業,愛取潤生,六識能作,第八能受」—“Ignorance gives rise to action, and craving and grasping moisten birth; the six consciousnesses are what makes, and the eighth is what receives” 〔T39n1799 0885b28〕 Explaining ‘the six are the thieves’ go-betweens,’ Zixuan says: 「六根為賊媒者,一引外賊,即六塵也;二起內賊,即煩惱也。」—“The six faculties are the thieves’ go-betweens: first, they draw in the outer thieves, which are the six dusts; second, they stir up the inner thieves, which are the afflictions.” 〔T39n1799 0885c16〕

Section 13 · Separately Showing the Superiority and Inferiority of the Faculties’ Functions Zixuan says: 「世界有三,謂眾生、五陰、器界也,揀非餘二,故標眾生。」—“There are three worlds: of living beings, of the five aggregates, and the container world; distinguishing it from the other two, it names living beings.” 〔T39n1799 0885c27〕 Explaining ‘three fours and four threes,’ ‘turning around, make twelve,’ and ‘flowing and changing in three layers,’ Zixuan says: 「今所解者,不加別法以變其數,只將今文過、現、未來進動算位,便成一千二百功德。」—“The present explanation adds no other method to change the numbers; simply by advancing past, present, and future of the present text through the places of reckoning, it becomes twelve hundred merits.” 〔T39n1799 0886a10〕 He also says: 「此約眾生身中六根取境本分功能作用名為功德,非同《法華》持經所熏令成淨用。」—“Here the original capacity and function of the six faculties in beings’ bodies in taking objects is called merit; it is not the same as in the Lotus, where they are perfumed by keeping the sūtra and made into pure functions.” 〔T39n1799 0886a29〕 Explaining the eye-faculty, Zixuan says: 「左右旁觀三分之二者」—“looking sideways to left and right, two-thirds” 〔T39n1799 0886b09〕 Explaining the nose-faculty, Zixuan says: 「出、入、中交共成三分,一分四百,闕於中交,故得八百。」—“Going out, coming in, and the junction in between together make three parts, each part four hundred; lacking the junction, it gets eight hundred.” 〔T39n1799 0886b19〕 Explaining the tongue-faculty, Zixuan says: 「能詮言句猶可分限,所詮理趣莫能盡極,故千二百。」—“The words and phrases that express can still be limited, but the principle expressed cannot be exhausted; therefore twelve hundred.” 〔T39n1799 0886b24〕 Explaining the body-faculty, Zixuan says: 「合具違、順,離但捨受,故云不知。」—“In union there are both the adverse and the agreeable; in separation there is only neutral feeling; therefore it says it does not know.” 〔T39n1799 0886b29〕 Explaining the mind-faculty, Zixuan says: 「意能遍緣三世三性世、出世法,無不具足,文顯易知。」—“The mind can take as conditions all dharmas of the three times and the three natures, worldly and world-transcending, lacking nothing; the text is plain and easy to know.” 〔T39n1799 0886c05〕

Section 14 · Directing the Choice of the Perfectly Penetrating Faculty for Cultivation and Realization Zixuan says: 「返妄歸真,真為流根,故云至不生滅」—“Turning back from the false and returning to the true, the true is the root of the flow; therefore it says ‘reach what neither arises nor perishes’” 〔T39n1799 0886c10〕 He also says: 「欲得此覺,應選圓根為趣入之要,若圓聽十方,耳根最勝,意令選擇以入圓通。」—“To obtain this awakening one should choose the perfect faculty as the key to entry; as for hearing perfectly in the ten directions, the ear-faculty is most superior; the intent is to have one choose and so enter perfect penetration.” 〔T39n1799 0886c12〕 He also says: 「此是如來知時知機,令自選擇」—“Here the Tathāgata, knowing the time and knowing the capacity, has them choose for themselves” 〔T39n1799 0886c17〕 Explaining one and six, Zixuan says: 「一六之情正是法執,執根是實,有一六故。」—“The sense of one and six is precisely clinging to dharmas: clinging to the faculties as real, there are one and six.” 〔T39n1799 0887a20〕 He also says: 「若言一者,六用應同,眼合能聞,足應解說。」—“If one says one, the six functions ought to be the same: the eye ought to be able to hear, and the feet ought to be able to speak.” 〔T39n1799 0887a28〕 He also says: 「若言六異,應不相干,一處聞經,二何欽問?」—“If one says the six are different, they ought not to concern one another: when one place hears the sūtra, why would the other two reverently ask?” 〔T39n1799 0887b04〕 Explaining the simile of the great empty space mixed among many vessels, Zixuan says: 「太虛,如來藏也。群器,六塵也。異空,六根也。」—“The great void is the tathāgatagarbha. The many vessels are the six dusts. The different spaces are the six faculties.” 〔T39n1799 0887b26〕

Section 15 · Expounding at Length the Origin of the Faculties’ Knots · Directly Showing the Gate of Entering the One Zixuan says: 「本一圓常妙湛明性,所相妄現,分明暗殊」—“The originally one, perfect, permanent, wondrous, profound, bright nature—the appearances it shapes falsely manifest, divided into the difference of brightness and darkness” 〔T39n1799 0887c03〕 Explaining the pure four elements, Zixuan says: 「既覺明相雜,粘湛合成,由是名為清淨四大,即勝義根也。」—“Since awakening and brightness are mixed together, adhering to the profound they are joined and formed; therefore they are named the pure four elements, which is the faculty of supreme meaning.” 〔T39n1799 0887c08〕 He also says: 「勝義根色屬不可見,而有對礙,故寄世俗根所依處蒲萄之相,表顯勝義。」—“The form of the faculty of supreme meaning belongs to the invisible, yet has resistance; therefore it lodges in the appearance of a grape cluster, the place the worldly faculty relies on, to display the supreme meaning.” 〔T39n1799 0887c11〕 Explaining ‘seeing things in a dark room,’ Zixuan says: 「居在身中不彰外相,如幽室見。」—“Dwelling in the body without showing an outer appearance, it is like seeing in a dark room.” 〔T39n1799 0888a14〕 Explaining ‘losing that essential clarity, they adhere to falsity and give forth light,’ Zixuan says: 「性覺之體本有真明,由彼妄覺影明忽起,遂令真覺隱於精了」—“The substance of the nature-awakening originally has true brightness; because the shadow-brightness of that false awakening suddenly arises, the true awakening is hidden in its essential clarity” 〔T39n1799 0888a20〕 He also says: 「由境有根,如風起浪,境風不息,識浪奚窮?故離塵境無根識耳。」—“Because of objects there are faculties, as wind raises waves; if the wind of objects does not stop, how could the waves of consciousness end? Therefore apart from dust-objects there is no faculty or consciousness.” 〔T39n1799 0888a28〕 Explaining ‘the brightness does not follow the faculty,’ Zixuan says: 「謂真妙覺明不循根境,即不逐緣生、不因境起,了然自覺,即是性明。」—“That is, the true wondrous awakened brightness does not follow faculties and objects: it is not born pursuing conditions and does not arise because of objects; clearly aware of itself, it is the brightness of the nature.” 〔T39n1799 0888b14〕 Explaining Aniruddha, Zixuan says: 「阿那律陀,云無滅,白飯王子,以多睡故如來呵之,從此精進,七日不眠,則失雙目。」—“Aniruddha means Unextinguished; he was the son of King Śuklodana. Because he slept a great deal, the Tathāgata rebuked him; from then on he practiced with vigor and did not sleep for seven days, and so lost both his eyes.” 〔T39n1799 0888b21〕 Explaining the examples of the six persons, Zixuan says: 「然上所說,欲顯真覺不假根塵,且引六人略以為比」—“What is said above wishes to disclose that true awakening does not borrow faculties and dusts; and so he cites six persons briefly as comparisons” 〔T39n1799 0888c25〕 Explaining ice melted by hot water, Zixuan says: 「三界萬法皆由無明妄念而得分別,今六根既拔,塵無所粘,妄念不生,性明內瑩」—“The myriad dharmas of the three realms are all discriminated by ignorance and false thought; now that the six faculties are pulled out, the dusts have nothing to adhere to, false thought does not arise, and the brightness of the nature is inwardly lustrous” 〔T39n1799 0889a03〕 Explaining the simile of suddenly closing the eyes, Zixuan says: 「此則近以世人六根隔越不相通用,尚有知覺同者,豈況真覺須假根塵耶?」—“Here, taking a near example: even worldly people, whose six faculties are separated and do not function for one another, still have the same knowing-awareness; how much less would true awakening need to borrow faculties and dusts?” 〔T39n1799 0889a17〕

Section 16 · Separately Refuting the Doubt Explaining the seven permanently abiding fruits, Zixuan says: 「菩提,云知覺,即智果。涅槃,云寂滅,即斷果。離偽妄無遷改,故曰真如。照察不變,名為佛性。」—“Bodhi means knowing-awareness: the fruit of wisdom. Nirvāṇa means quiescent extinction: the fruit of cutting off. Apart from the spurious and the false, without shifting or change: therefore it is called suchness. Illumining and examining without change: this is called buddha-nature.” 〔T39n1799 0889b07〕 He also says: 「菴摩羅,云無垢,離障所顯,即白淨無垢識也。」—“Amala means stainless: disclosed in being apart from obstruction, it is the white, pure, stainless consciousness.” 〔T39n1799 0889b09〕 He also says: 「七名雖別,一體無殊,堅固凝然,常住不動如金剛也。」—“Though the seven names differ, they are one substance without distinction, firm and congealed, permanently abiding and unmoving like vajra.” 〔T39n1799 0889b12〕 Explaining ‘ultimately annihilated,’ Zixuan says: 「因緣所起,自體本無,故云畢竟斷滅。」—“What arises from causes and conditions originally has no self-substance; therefore it says ultimately annihilated.” 〔T39n1799 0889b21〕 He also says: 「如來說有湛精圓常,洎今所推唯是斷滅,明言雖有,考實元無,若此相違,真實何在?」—“The Tathāgata said there is the profound, essential, perfect, and permanent, but what is now investigated is only annihilation; though it was plainly said to exist, examined in fact it is originally nonexistent; with such a contradiction, where is the truth?” 〔T39n1799 0889b26〕

Section 17 · The Tathāgata Resolves It Zixuan says: 「分別見妄能所強生,為顛倒因。迷常執斷,名為真倒。」—“Discriminating views are false, and subject and object forcibly arise: these are the causes of inversion. Confused about the permanent and clinging to annihilation: this is called true inversion.” 〔T39n1799 0889c04〕 Explaining the striking of the bell, Zixuan says: 「擊鍾三問,審定稱聞,欲轉問宗,又令重釋。」—“Striking the bell and asking three times, he made sure they declared that they heard; wishing to turn the question to its point, he had them explain again.” 〔T39n1799 0889c16〕 He also says: 「一則斥成矯亂,一則顯其性常,令知生滅之中有不生滅,不因聲滅、不因聲生,生滅圓離即常真實,斯則了然常住,何斷滅之有乎?」—“On the one hand it rebukes them for falling into equivocation; on the other it discloses that the nature is permanent, making them know that within arising and perishing there is what neither arises nor perishes, which does not perish because sound perishes or arise because sound arises; perfectly apart from arising and perishing, it is permanent and truly real; so it clearly abides permanently—what annihilation is there?” 〔T39n1799 0889c17〕 Explaining ‘after a short while’ and ‘after a moment,’ Zixuan says: 「少選猶少頃也,有頃猶頃剋也,皆時之少分也。」—“‘After a short while’ is like ‘a little while’; ‘after a moment’ is like ‘a brief instant’; both are small divisions of time.” 〔T39n1799 0889c25〕 Explaining equivocation, Zixuan says: 「斥破意者,此聞若因聲有,則不離聲。若離聲有,此是真聞。」—“The meaning of the rebuke and refutation: if this hearing exists because of sound, it is not apart from sound. If it exists apart from sound, this is true hearing.” 〔T39n1799 0890a08〕 He also says: 「又言是聲、又言是聞,既隨言印順,故成矯亂。」—“They say now that it is sound, now that it is hearing; since they follow his words and assent, it becomes equivocation.” 〔T39n1799 0890a11〕

Section 18 · Refuting His View of Annihilation by the Nature of Hearing Zixuan says: 「有無之知自屬聲境,且不關聞」—“The knowing of presence and absence belongs of itself to the object of sound and has nothing to do with hearing” 〔T39n1799 0890a20〕 He also says: 「聞性常然未曾起滅」—“The nature of hearing is permanently so and has never arisen or perished” 〔T39n1799 0890a21〕 Explaining the simile of the sound sleeper, Zixuan says: 「睡人六識歸種,思覺不行,但任運聞,即真聞性。」—“In the sleeper the six consciousnesses return to their seeds and thought and awareness do not operate; he simply hears spontaneously: this is the true nature of hearing.” 〔T39n1799 0890b15〕 He also says: 「形命雖遷,真常不動,妄識尚在,況乎聞性隨汝消謝?」—“Though body and life shift, true permanence does not move; even false consciousness still remains—how much less would the nature of hearing dissolve away with you?” 〔T39n1799 0890b22〕 Explaining ‘guards true permanence,’ Zixuan says: 「若能亡緣內照,不逐前塵,塵既不緣,根無所偶,返流全一,六用不行,淨覺現前,寂照明露,斯則守於真常,根塵銷落也。」—“If one can forget conditions and illumine within, not pursuing the dusts before one, then since the dusts are not taken as conditions, the faculties have nothing to pair with; turning back the flow, wholly one, the six functions do not operate, pure awakening appears before one, and quiescent illumination is clearly revealed; this is guarding true permanence, and faculties and dusts falling away.” 〔T39n1799 0890c03〕 Explaining ‘the appearances of thought are dust, and the feelings of consciousness are defilement,’ Zixuan says: 「想相即境,情即是根,根境識三俱能染污,障翳般若。」—“The appearances of thought are objects, and feeling is the faculty; faculty, object, and consciousness, all three, can defile and obscure prajñā.” 〔T39n1799 0890c06〕

V. Divergent Readings of the Commentators

This fascicle relies only on Zixuan; Jiaoguang Zhenjian’s Commentary on the True Vein of the Śūraṅgama Sūtra is listed by title only and is not cited in this fascicle.

The divergent readings and doubts that Zixuan himself records in his commentary are recorded word for word, without adjudication:

  • The ancients’ explanations of nature-awakening and original awakening: Zixuan says: 「古人所解各隨其意,云云在彼,不能具敘。」—“The ancients each explained it according to their own ideas; what they said is there, and cannot be set out in full.” 〔T39n1799 0874c09〕
  • The order of the four wheels: Zixuan also records the teaching of the Lesser Vehicle: 「然小乘宗,水輪在前、金輪在後,與此不同者,而不知風輪持水即是堅礙。」—“Yet in the school of the Lesser Vehicle the water-wheel comes first and the metal-wheel after; this differs from the present text, but they do not know that the wind-wheel’s holding up the water is itself hardness and obstruction.” 〔T39n1799 0876b14〕
  • Provisionally setting up the recognition of true spontaneity: Zixuan records the ancients’ explanation without adopting it: 「古人於此不言縱立認真自然,斯則不唯增戲論心,反令圓文成外道教,焉敢聞命!」—“Here the ancients did not say that it is provisionally set up as recognizing true spontaneity; this not only increases the mind of idle disputation, but on the contrary turns the perfect text into an outsiders’ teaching—how could I dare accept it!” 〔T39n1799 0882c23〕
  • Mātaṅgī’s realization of the fruit: Zixuan raises a question: 「問:阿難尚在初果,登伽何以却證第三?」—“Question: Ānanda is still at the first fruit; why does Mātaṅgī instead realize the third?” 〔T39n1799 0883a22〕 He answers it himself: 「答:一、約權實,阿難示迹現多聞無功,故在初果;登伽實人,顯呪力功大,速證第三。」—“Answer: First, in terms of the provisional and the real: Ānanda displays traces, showing that much learning is without merit, and so he is at the first fruit; Mātaṅgī is a real person, disclosing that the power of the spell is great in merit, and so she swiftly realizes the third.” 〔T39n1799 0883a23〕
  • The meaning of the three changes: Zixuan says: 「三變之義古今多解,各見其文不能具敘。」—“The meaning of the three changes has many explanations old and new; each is seen in its own text and cannot be set out in full.” 〔T39n1799 0886a09〕
  • The dispute over having form or being formless: Zixuan says: 「若以有色、無色為諍論者,猶邀空華結為空果,故此所明六皆四大,無相違也。」—“If one disputes over having form or being formless, it is like inviting sky-flowers to bear the fruit of the void; therefore what is made clear here is that all six are the four elements, with no contradiction.” 〔T39n1799 0888a16〕
  • Doubts left on the circumstances of the six persons: on the dragon Upananda Zixuan says: 「無耳而聽,未詳緣起。」—“Hearing without ears: its circumstance is not known in detail.” 〔T39n1799 0888b29〕 On the goddess of the Gaṅgā: 「非鼻聞香,未見其緣。」—“Smelling scents without a nose: its circumstance is not found.” 〔T39n1799 0888c04〕 On Gavāṃpati: 「異舌者,未見別緣,或可既云牛相,即其牛舌也。」—“As for the unusual tongue, no separate circumstance is found; perhaps, since he is said to have the marks of an ox, it is his ox’s tongue.” 〔T39n1799 0888c09〕
  • Kāśyapa’s entering samādhi: Zixuan records two accounts side by side: 「《俱舍》即云已入涅槃,餘說入定。」—“The Kośa says he has already entered nirvāṇa; other accounts say he entered samādhi.” 〔T39n1799 0888c21〕 He also says: 「故知入定、涅槃俱不可測。」—“Therefore one knows that entering samādhi and nirvāṇa are both unfathomable.” 〔T39n1799 0888c23〕
  • The sleeper’s nature of hearing: Zixuan raises an objection and resolves it himself: 「若唯約喻,睡人應無聞性,但約不隨根起,非由作意,故是真聞。」—“If one takes it only in terms of the simile, the sleeper should have no nature of hearing; but in terms of its not arising according to the faculty and not coming from deliberate attention, it is true hearing.” 〔T39n1799 0890b16〕

Where the characters of the sūtra as Zixuan restates it differ from the base text, they are recorded side by side without adjudication: 「生羯羅藍、遏蒲曇等」—“there are born the kalala, the arbuda, and so on” 〔T39n1799 0877a14〕, where the base text reads 羯囉藍 and 遏蒱曇; 「隨力彊弱」—“according to the strength or weakness of their power” 〔T39n1799 0877b17〕, where the base text reads 強; 「因悟而出」—“does it come out because of awakening” 〔T39n1799 0878a05〕, where the base text reads 所 and the Ming recension reads 而; 「倏有悟人」—“suddenly an awakened man” 〔T39n1799 0878a13〕, where the base text reads 倐; 「亦如翳人見空中華」—“again, it is like a man whose eyes have cataracts seeing flowers in the sky” 〔T39n1799 0878a27〕, where the base text reads 瞖 and 花; 「相陵滅義」—“the principle of their encroaching upon and destroying each other” 〔T39n1799 0879a09〕, where the base text reads 𣣋; 「先無準的」—“with no fixed standard from the first” 〔T39n1799 0879a29〕, where the base text reads 准; 「非般剌若」—“not prajñā” 〔T39n1799 0879c25〕, where the base text reads 鉢 and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 般; 「離即離非、是即非即」—“apart from is, apart from is not; it is is, and it is not is” 〔T39n1799 0880a29〕, where the base text punctuates it as 「離即、離非,是即、非即」—“apart from ‘is,’ apart from ‘is not’; it is ‘is,’ and it is not ‘is’”; 「嗔責己頭」—“angrily reproached his own head” 〔T39n1799 0881a07〕, where the base text reads 瞋; 「大目揵連」—“Mahāmaudgalyāyana” 〔T39n1799 0882a26〕, where the base text reads 犍 and the Song recension reads 揵; 「消其愛欲」—“her desire of love was dissolved” 〔T39n1799 0883b04〕, where the base text reads 銷; 「羅睺母」—“the mother of Rāhula” 〔T39n1799 0883b05〕, where the base text reads 羅睺羅母 and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions lack the character 羅; 「疑惑消除」—“their doubts and delusions were dissolved” 〔T39n1799 0883b22〕, where the base text reads 銷; 「賜與華屋」—“the gift of a splendid house” 〔T39n1799 0883c13〕, where the base text reads 以 and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 與; 「不生疲倦」—“not giving rise to weariness” 〔T39n1799 0884a06〕, where the base text reads 惓; 「汝身現搏四大為體」—“your body now grasps the four elements as its substance” 〔T39n1799 0884c19〕, where the base text reads 摶; 「當先擇生死根本」—“you should first choose the root of birth and death” 〔T39n1799 0885a23〕, where the base text reads 死生; 「復還元覺」—“return to the original awakening” 〔T39n1799 0885a28〕, where the base text reads 伏 and the Ming recension reads 復; 「貯於靜器」—“store it in a still vessel” 〔T39n1799 0885b13〕, where the base text reads 淨 and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 靜; 「墮裂」—“torn apart” 〔T39n1799 0885c11〕, where the base text reads 隳 and the Taishō first printing reads 墮; 「空無形相」—“space has no form or appearance” 〔T39n1799 0885c11〕, where the base text reads 相形; 「世間只目」—“the world points only to” 〔T39n1799 0886a03〕, where the base text reads 秖; 「左右旁觀」—“looking sideways to left and right” 〔T39n1799 0886b06〕, where the base text reads 傍 and the Ming recension reads 旁; 「唯聖與凡無不包容」—“whether sagely or ordinary, there is nothing it does not embrace” 〔T39n1799 0886c03〕, where the base text reads 惟 and 苞; 「雖得六消,猶末亡一」—“although you have attained the dissolving of the six, you have not yet forgotten the one” 〔T39n1799 0887b11〕, where the base text reads 銷 and 未; 「摶觸成根」—“grasping touch, it forms the faculty” 〔T39n1799 0888a04〕, where the base text reads 搏; 「攬法成根」—“surveying dharmas, it forms the faculty” 〔T39n1799 0888a10〕, where the base text reads 覽 and the Ming recension reads 攬; 「生滅、明暗」—“arising and perishing, brightness and darkness” 〔T39n1799 0888b01〕, where the base text reads 暗明; 「離於明暗」—“apart from brightness and darkness” 〔T39n1799 0889b14〕, where the base text reads 暗明; 「擊久聲消」—“when it has been struck long and the sound fades away” 〔T39n1799 0889c15〕, where the base text reads 銷; 「唯聞與聲」—“only, about hearing and sound” 〔T39n1799 0890a07〕, where the base text reads 惟 and the Song recension reads 唯; 「或為撞鍾」—“or the striking of a bell” 〔T39n1799 0890b12〕, where the base text reads 復 and the Yuan and Ming recensions read 為; 「靜搖、開閑、通塞」—“stillness and shaking, opening and closing, openness and blockage” 〔T39n1799 0890b15〕, where the base text reads 開閉; 「根塵識心」—“the faculties and dusts and the cognizing mind” 〔T39n1799 0890c01〕, where the base text reads 塵根、識心 and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 根塵.

VI. Terms (first occurrences)

Seven names—Pūrṇa (富樓那), Mātaṅgī (摩登伽), perfect penetration (圓通), the six faculties (六根), tathāgatagarbha (如來藏), the three conditions (三緣), and buddha-nature (佛性)—already appear in the table of contents of the front matter. Seven terms—the toils of the dusts (塵勞), the four dusts of the floating faculty (浮根四塵), dhyāna (禪那), samādhi (三摩提), the cognizing mind (識心), the true mind (真心), and the dusts before one (前塵)—have already been glossed in Fascicle One, and are not listed again; ten terms—seeing (見), hearing (聞), feeling (覺), knowing (知), the foremost meaning (第一義), brahmin (梵志), annihilation (斷滅), the essence of seeing (見精), floating dust (浮塵), and non-union (非和合)—have already been glossed in Fascicle Two, and are not listed again; for three names—dhāraṇī (陀羅尼), Aniruddha (阿那律陀), and equivocation (矯亂)—Fascicle Two has already given the great dhāraṇī (大陀羅尼), Aniruddha (阿那律), and the four kinds of equivocating argument about the deathless (四種不死矯亂論議), and they too are not listed again; eight terms—pure and originally so (清淨本然), pervading the dharma-realm (周遍法界), the four elements (四大), the eighteen realms (十八界), idle disputation (戲論), the Jeweled King (寶王), Śūnyatā (舜若多), and unsurpassed awakening (無上覺)—have already been glossed in Fascicle Three, and are not listed again. Thirteen terms—bodhi (菩提), nirvāṇa (涅槃), faculty (根), dust (塵), consciousness (識), causes and conditions (因緣), spontaneity (自然), union (和合), false thought (妄想), without outflows (無漏), inversion (顛倒), beginningless (無始), and the truth of the foremost meaning (第一義諦)—have already been glossed among the terms of the Awakening of Faith and the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra, and are not listed again.

Terms first seen in this fascicle, in order of appearance; where the fascicle supplies its own gloss, its sentence is recorded as well, and where it does not, only the name and anchor are listed:

  • 富樓那彌多羅尼子 — Pūrṇa Maitrāyaṇīputra 〔T19 0119c07〕: Pūrṇa already appears in the table of contents of the front matter; this fascicle gives his full name for the first time.
  • 真勝義性 — the nature of true supreme meaning 〔T19 0119c26〕: 「如來今日普為此會宣勝義中真勝義性」—“Today the Tathāgata will proclaim, universally for this assembly, the nature of true supreme meaning within the supreme meaning” 〔T19 0119c26〕
  • 定性聲聞 — the fixed-nature śrāvakas 〔T19 0119c27〕 · 二空 — the two emptinesses 〔T19 0119c27〕
  • 一乘寂滅場地 — the ground of quiescence of the One Vehicle 〔T19 0119c28〕 · 真阿練若 — the true araṇya 〔T19 0119c29〕
  • 性覺妙明 — the nature-awakening is wondrously bright · 本覺明妙 — the original awakening is brightly wondrous 〔T19 0120a03〕: 「汝常不聞如來宣說性覺妙明本覺明妙?」—“Have you not always heard the Tathāgata proclaim that the nature-awakening is wondrously bright and the original awakening is brightly wondrous?” 〔T19 0120a03〕
  • 明覺 — bright awakening 〔T19 0120a06〕: 「性覺必明,妄為明覺。」—“The nature-awakening is necessarily bright; falsely it is taken as a bright awakening.” 〔T19 0120a08〕
  • 無同異 — neither-same-nor-different 〔T19 0120a10〕: 「無同異中熾然成異」—“within what is neither-same-nor-different, difference blazes forth” 〔T19 0120a10〕
  • 風輪 — the wind-wheel 〔T19 0120a15〕 · 金輪 — the metal-wheel 〔T19 0120a16〕 · 水輪 — the water-wheel 〔T19 0120a18〕
  • 洲潬 — continents and sandbanks 〔T19 0120a20〕: 「濕為巨海,乾為洲潬。」—“The wet becomes the great ocean, the dry becomes continents and sandbanks.” 〔T19 0120a19〕
  • 世界相續 — the continuity of the world 〔T19 0120a24〕: 「交妄發生,遞相為種;以是因緣世界相續。」—“Falsities arising in exchange, each in turn becomes the seed of the other; by these causes and conditions, there is the continuity of the world.” 〔T19 0120a23〕
  • 羯囉藍 — kalala · 遏蒱曇 — arbuda 〔T19 0120b01〕
  • 胎、卵、濕、化 — mother-born, egg-born, moisture-born, and transformation-born 〔T19 0120b01〕: 「卵唯想生,胎因情有,濕以合感,化以離應。」—“The egg-born arise only from thought, the mother-born exist because of feeling, the moisture-born are stirred through union, and the transformation-born respond through separation.” 〔T19 0120b02〕
  • 眾生相續 — the continuity of living beings 〔T19 0120b04〕: 「情、想、合、離更相變易,所有受業逐其飛沈,以是因緣眾生相續。」—“Feeling, thought, union, and separation change into one another in turn; all beings who receive action, according to their action, fly up or sink down; by these causes and conditions, there is the continuity of living beings.” 〔T19 0120b03〕
  • 欲貪 — the greed of desire 〔T19 0120b06〕 · 殺貪 — the greed of killing 〔T19 0120b08〕 · 盜貪 — the greed of stealing 〔T19 0120b11〕
  • 業果相續 — the continuity of action and result 〔T19 0120b14〕: 「唯殺、盜、婬三為根本,以是因緣業果相續。」—“Only killing, stealing, and lust, these three, are the root; by these causes and conditions, there is the continuity of action and result.” 〔T19 0120b13〕
  • 三種相續 — the three kinds of continuity 〔T19 0120b14〕: 「如是三種顛倒相續,皆是覺明明了知性,因了發相,從妄見生。」—“These three kinds of inverted continuity are all awakened brightness, the nature of clear knowing: because of discerning, appearances are sent forth, arising from false seeing.” 〔T19 0120b14〕 Also 「世間、業果、眾生、三種相續」—“the three kinds of continuity—of the world, of action and result, and of living beings” 〔T19 0121b23〕
  • 妙空明覺 — the wondrous, empty, bright awakening 〔T19 0120b19〕
  • 瞖 — cataract 〔T19 0120b29〕: 「亦如瞖人見空中花,瞖病若除,花於空滅。」—“Again, it is like a man whose eyes have cataracts seeing flowers in the sky; if the cataract is removed, the flowers vanish in the sky.” 〔T19 0120b29〕
  • 金鑛 — gold ore 〔T19 0120c06〕
  • 空菓 — the fruit of the void 〔T19 0120c20〕: 「猶邀空花結為空菓」—“it is like inviting sky-flowers to bear the fruit of the void” 〔T19 0120c20〕
  • 妙覺明心 — the wondrous awakened bright mind 〔T19 0120c21〕: 「觀性元真,唯妙覺明,妙覺明心先非水、火」—“Looking at the nature, it is originally true, only the wondrous awakened brightness; the wondrous awakened bright mind is from the first not water or fire” 〔T19 0120c21〕
  • 如來藏隨為色空 — the tathāgatagarbha accordingly becomes form and emptiness 〔T19 0120c29〕: 「而如來藏隨為色空,周遍法界」—“and the tathāgatagarbha accordingly becomes form and becomes emptiness, pervading the dharma-realm” 〔T19 0120c29〕
  • 背覺合塵 — turning from awakening to join the dusts 〔T19 0121a02〕: 「眾生迷悶背覺合塵」—“Beings, confused and stupefied, turn from awakening to join the dusts” 〔T19 0121a02〕
  • 滅塵合覺 — extinguishing the dusts to join awakening 〔T19 0121a07〕: 「滅塵合覺,故發真如妙覺明性。」—“Extinguishing the dusts to join awakening, it therefore gives rise to the wondrous awakened bright nature of suchness.” 〔T19 0121a07〕
  • 檀那 — dāna · 尸羅 — śīla · 毘梨耶 — vīrya · 羼提 — kṣānti · 禪那 — dhyāna · 鉢剌若 — prajñā · 波羅蜜多 — pāramitā 〔T19 0121a13〕: they appear in both the list of ‘neither’ and the list of ‘each and every one’; the vernacular rendering adds the meaning in brackets once.
  • 怛闥阿竭 — tathāgata 〔T19 0121a14〕 · 阿羅訶 — arhat · 三耶三菩 — samyak-saṃbuddha 〔T19 0121a15〕 (怛闥阿竭 is a transcription of the same word as 如來).
  • 俱非 — neither of them all · 俱即 — each and every one of them 〔T19 0121a16〕: 「以是俱非世出世故」—“because it is neither of them all, worldly or world-transcending” 〔T19 0121a16〕; 「以是即俱世出世故」—“because it is each and every one of them all, worldly and world-transcending” 〔T19 0121a24〕
  • 離即、離非,是即、非即 — apart from ‘is,’ apart from ‘is not’; it is ‘is,’ and it is not ‘is’ 〔T19 0121a25〕: 「即如來藏妙明心元,離即、離非,是即、非即。」—“That very tathāgatagarbha, the source of the wondrous bright mind, is apart from ‘is’ and apart from ‘is not’; it is ‘is,’ and it is not ‘is.’” 〔T19 0121a25〕
  • 三有 — the three existences 〔T19 0121a26〕
  • 寶覺真心 — the jeweled-awakening true mind 〔T19 0121a29〕
  • 海印 — the ocean-seal 〔T19 0121b01〕: 「如我按指,海印發光」—“when I press my finger, the ocean-seal emits light” 〔T19 0121b01〕
  • 演若達多 — Yajñadatta 〔T19 0121b10〕
  • 魑魅 — a mountain-demon 〔T19 0121b11〕
  • 歇即菩提 — when it stops, that is bodhi 〔T19 0121b25〕: 「歇即菩提,勝淨明心本周法界,不從人得」—“When it stops, that is bodhi: the supremely pure bright mind originally pervades the dharma-realm and is not got from another” 〔T19 0121b25〕
  • 肯綮 — the joints and sinews 〔T19 0121b26〕
  • 如意珠 — the wish-fulfilling jewel 〔T19 0121b28〕
  • 拘舍梨 — Gośālī 〔T19 0121c10〕: Fascicle Two writes 拘舍離; this fascicle writes 拘舍梨, following the base text.
  • 和合性 — the nature of union · 本然性 — the nature of what is originally so 〔T19 0121c24〕: 「猶如世間諸相雜和成一體者,名和合性;非和合者稱本然性。」—“Just as in the world the various appearances mingled and combined into one body are called the nature of union, and what is not in union is called the nature of what is originally so.” 〔T19 0121c23〕
  • 無戲論法 — the dharma free of idle disputation 〔T19 0121c26〕: 「本然非然,和合非合,合、然俱離,離、合俱非,此句方名無戲論法。」—“What is originally so is not so, and what is in union is not union; union and so-ness are both left behind, and leaving and union are both negated—only this phrase is called the dharma free of idle disputation.” 〔T19 0121c25〕
  • 十二部經 — the twelve divisions of the scriptures 〔T19 0121c27〕
  • 阿那含 — anāgāmin 〔T19 0122a02〕 · 精進林 — a forest of vigor 〔T19 0122a03〕
  • 性比丘尼 — the bhikṣuṇī Prakṛti · 耶輸陀羅 — Yaśodharā 〔T19 0122a07〕 (性, “nature,” renders the name Prakṛti by its meaning; Yaśodharā is the mother of Rāhula, written 羅睺羅 in the base text and 羅睺 in Zixuan’s restatement, and rendered Rāhula in both forms).
  • 無餘涅槃 — nirvāṇa without remainder 〔T19 0122a20〕
  • 二決定義 — the two decisive meanings 〔T19 0122a27〕: 「應當先明發覺初心二決定義。」—“should first make clear the two decisive meanings of arousing awakening in the initial mind.” 〔T19 0122a27〕
  • 因地發心 — the resolve at the stage of cause · 果地覺 — the awakening at the stage of result 〔T19 0122a29〕: 「應當審觀因地發心,與果地覺為同、為異?」—“you should carefully contemplate whether the resolve at the stage of cause and the awakening at the stage of result are the same or different.” 〔T19 0122a29〕
  • 五疊渾濁 — the five layers of turbidity 〔T19 0122b09〕: 「從始入終,五疊渾濁」—“from beginning to end, five layers pile up and form turbidity” 〔T19 0122b08〕
  • 劫濁 — the turbidity of the kalpa 〔T19 0122b15〕: 「汝見虛空遍十方界,空見不分。有空無體,有見無覺,相織妄成;是第一重名為劫濁。」—“You see empty space pervading the realms of the ten directions, space and seeing undivided. There is space without substance, and seeing without awareness; the two weave together and are falsely formed; this is the first layer, named the turbidity of the kalpa.” 〔T19 0122b13〕
  • 見濁 — the turbidity of views 〔T19 0122b17〕: 「汝身現摶四大為體,見、聞、覺、知壅令留礙,水、火、風、土旋令覺知,相織妄成;是第二重名為見濁。」—“Your body now grasps the four elements as its substance; seeing, hearing, feeling, and knowing are blocked and made obstructive; water, fire, wind, and earth are revolved into awareness and knowing; they weave together and are falsely formed; this is the second layer, named the turbidity of views.” 〔T19 0122b15〕
  • 煩惱濁 — the turbidity of afflictions 〔T19 0122b19〕: 「又汝心中憶識誦習,性發知見,容現六塵,離塵無相,離覺無性,相織妄成;是第三重名煩惱濁。」—“Further, in your mind, remembering, recognizing, reciting, and practicing, the nature gives forth knowing and seeing and admits the appearance of the six dusts; apart from the dusts there are no appearances, and apart from awareness there is no nature; they weave together and are falsely formed; this is the third layer, named the turbidity of afflictions.” 〔T19 0122b17〕
  • 眾生濁 — the turbidity of living beings 〔T19 0122b21〕: 「又汝朝夕生滅不停,知見每欲留於世間,業運每常遷於國土,相織妄成;是第四重名眾生濁。」—“Further, you arise and perish morning and evening without stopping; knowing and seeing constantly wish to remain in the world, while the turning of action constantly shifts you from land to land; they weave together and are falsely formed; this is the fourth layer, named the turbidity of living beings.” 〔T19 0122b19〕
  • 命濁 — the turbidity of life 〔T19 0122b24〕: 「汝等見聞元無異性,眾塵隔越,無狀異生,性中相知,用中相背,同異失準,相織妄成;是第五重名為命濁。」—“Your seeing and hearing originally have no different natures; separated by the many dusts, they give rise without cause to difference; in nature they know each other, in function they oppose each other; sameness and difference lose their standard; they weave together and are falsely formed; this is the fifth layer, named the turbidity of life.” 〔T19 0122b21〕
  • 因地心 — the mind at the stage of cause 〔T19 0122b27〕: 「得元明覺無生滅性,為因地心」—“obtain the original bright awakening’s nature without arising or perishing as the mind at the stage of cause” 〔T19 0122b26〕
  • 客塵煩惱 — the guest-dust afflictions 〔T19 0122b29〕 · 根本無明 — fundamental ignorance 〔T19 0122c01〕: 「清水現前,名為初伏客塵煩惱。去泥純水,名為永斷根本無明。」—“The clear water appears before you; this is named first subduing the guest-dust afflictions. Removing the mud and leaving only pure water is named forever cutting off fundamental ignorance.” 〔T19 0122b29〕
  • 發業潤生 — giving rise to action and moistening birth 〔T19 0122c05〕
  • 六為賊媒 — the six are the thieves’ go-betweens 〔T19 0122c10〕: 「六為賊媒,自劫家寶」—“these six are the thieves’ go-betweens, robbing the treasures of their own house” 〔T19 0122c10〕
  • 眾生世界 — the world of living beings 〔T19 0122c11〕: 「云何名為眾生世界?世為遷流,界為方位。」—“What is called the world of living beings? ‘World’ is flowing passage, and ‘realm’ is direction and position.” 〔T19 0122c12〕
  • 千二百功德 — twelve hundred merits 〔T19 0122c20〕: 「六根之中,各各功德有千二百。」—“within the six faculties each has twelve hundred merits.” 〔T19 0122c20〕
  • 六受用根 — the six faculties of reception and use 〔T19 0123a06〕
  • 六湛圓明 — the six, profound, perfectly bright 〔T19 0123a09〕
  • 一門深入 — enter deeply by one gate 〔T19 0123a13〕: 「令汝但於一門深入,入一無妄,彼六知根一時清淨。」—“so that you need only enter deeply by one gate; entering the one, without falsity, those six knowing faculties are at once purified.” 〔T19 0123a13〕
  • 須陀洹 — srota-āpanna 〔T19 0123a17〕 · 見所斷 — what is cut off by seeing 〔T19 0123a18〕 · 修所斷 — what is cut off by cultivation 〔T19 0123a19〕 · 分劑頭數 — the divisions and number 〔T19 0123a20〕
  • 粘湛 — adhering to the profound 〔T19 0123b03〕
  • 清淨四大 — the pure four elements 〔T19 0123b04〕: 「根元目為清淨四大」—“the faculty in its origin is called the pure four elements” 〔T19 0123b04〕
  • 六根互相為用 — the six faculties function for one another 〔T19 0123b28〕: 「明不循根,寄根明發,由是六根互相為用。」—“the brightness does not follow the faculty, but lodging in the faculty the brightness comes forth; from this the six faculties function for one another.” 〔T19 0123b28〕
  • 跋難陀龍 — the dragon Upananda · 殑伽神女 — the goddess of the Gaṅgā 〔T19 0123c01〕 · 驕梵鉢提 — Gavāṃpati 〔T19 0123c02〕
  • 滅盡定 — the samādhi of cessation · 摩訶迦葉 — Mahākāśyapa 〔T19 0123c04〕
  • 無上知覺 — unsurpassed knowing-awareness 〔T19 0123c07〕
  • 七常住果 — the seven permanently abiding fruits 〔T19 0123c20〕: including 菴摩羅識 — the amala-consciousness · 空如來藏 — the empty tathāgatagarbha · 大圓鏡智 — the great perfect mirror wisdom 〔T19 0123c15〕; 「菩提、涅槃、真如、佛性、菴摩羅識、空如來藏、大圓鏡智,是七種名稱謂雖別,清淨圓滿體性堅凝,如金剛王常住不壞。」—“Bodhi, nirvāṇa, suchness, buddha-nature, the amala-consciousness, the empty tathāgatagarbha, and the great perfect mirror wisdom—these seven names, though their designations differ, are pure and perfect, their substance and nature firm and congealed, permanently abiding and indestructible like the Vajra King.” 〔T19 0123c14〕
  • 金剛王 — the Vajra King 〔T19 0123c17〕
  • 湛精圓常 — profound, essential, perfect, and permanent 〔T19 0123c23〕
  • 擊鍾 — striking the bell 〔T19 0123c28〕
  • 聞性 — the nature of hearing 〔T19 0124a16〕: 「若實無聞,聞性已滅同于枯木」—“If there were truly no hearing, the nature of hearing would already have perished, the same as a withered tree” 〔T19 0124a16〕
  • 性淨妙常 — the nature pure, wondrous, and permanent 〔T19 0124b01〕
  • 真常 — true permanence 〔T19 0121b06〕: 「若棄生滅,守於真常,常光現前」—“If one casts aside arising and perishing and guards true permanence, the permanent light appears before one” 〔T19 0124b02〕
  • 法眼 — the dharma-eye 〔T19 0124b04〕

VII. Similes and Rhetoric

The deaf man listening for a mosquito: 「猶如聾人逾百步外聆於蚊蚋」—“like a deaf man a hundred paces away listening for a mosquito” 〔T19 0119c11〕

The confused man taking south for north: 「譬如迷人,於一聚落惑南為北」—“It is like a man who has lost his way and, in a village, takes south for north” 〔T19 0120b21〕

The sky-flowers of the man with cataracts: 「亦如瞖人見空中花」—“Again, it is like a man whose eyes have cataracts seeing flowers in the sky” 〔T19 0120b29〕

Gold ore and pure gold · wood becoming ash: 「又如金鑛雜於精金,其金一純,更不成雜;如木成灰,不重為木」—“Again, it is like gold ore mixed with pure gold: once the gold is pure, it does not become mixed again; as when wood becomes ash, it does not become wood again” 〔T19 0120c06〕

Great empty space does not refuse the appearances: 「譬如虛空體非群相,而不拒彼諸相發揮。」—“It is like empty space, whose substance is not any of the many appearances, and yet which does not refuse those appearances their display.” 〔T19 0120c11〕 Its seven appearances: 「彼太虛空,日照則明,雲屯則暗,風搖則動,霽澄則清,氣凝則濁,土積成霾,水澄成映。」—“That great empty space is bright when the sun shines, dark when clouds gather, moving when the wind stirs, clear when the sky clears after rain, turbid when vapors congeal, hazy when earth accumulates, and reflecting when water is still.” 〔T19 0120c13〕

The sun’s reflection in the water: 「如一水中現於日影,兩人同觀水中之日,東西各行,則各有日隨二人去」—“It is like the reflection of the sun appearing in one body of water: two people look together at the sun in the water and go off east and west, and then each has a sun following the two people as they go” 〔T19 0120c25〕

The qin, the se, the konghou, and the pipa: 「譬如琴、瑟、箜篌、琵琶,雖有妙音,若無妙指終不能發。」—“It is like the qin, the se, the konghou, and the pipa: although they have wondrous sounds, without wondrous fingers they can never sound them forth.” 〔T19 0121a28〕

Pressing the finger, the ocean-seal: 「如我按指,海印發光;汝暫舉心,塵勞先起」—“when I press my finger, the ocean-seal emits light; when you raise your mind for a moment, the toils of the dusts arise first” 〔T19 0121b01〕

Yajñadatta looking at his face: 「室羅城中演若達多,忽於晨朝以鏡照面」—“Yajñadatta in the city of Śrāvastī, who suddenly one morning looked at his face in a mirror” 〔T19 0121b09〕

Telling of a dream on waking: 「得菩提者,如寤時人、說夢中事」—“One who has attained bodhi is like a man awake telling of things in a dream” 〔T19 0121b19〕

The wish-fulfilling jewel in the garment: 「譬如有人,於自衣中、繫如意珠,不自覺知」—“It is like a man who has a wish-fulfilling jewel tied within his own garment and does not know it himself” 〔T19 0121b28〕

The traveler and the splendid house: 「我今猶如旅泊之人,忽蒙天王賜以華屋。」—“I am now like a traveler lodging on the road who suddenly receives from a heavenly king the gift of a splendid house.” 〔T19 0122a17〕

Dust thrown into clear water: 「譬如清水清潔本然;即彼塵土灰沙之倫,本質留礙」—“It is like clear water, pure and clean as it originally is; and that dust, earth, ash, sand, and the like are by nature obstructive” 〔T19 0122b09〕; below, the five turbidities all conclude alike with ‘they weave together and are falsely formed; this is the Nth layer, named the turbidity of X’ (VI).

Clarifying turbid water in a pure vessel: 「如澄濁水貯於淨器,靜深不動,沙土自沈,清水現前」—“It is like clarifying turbid water: store it in a pure vessel, still and deep, unmoving; the sand and earth sink of themselves and the clear water appears before you” 〔T19 0122b28〕

Those who untie knots: 「汝觀世間解結之人,不見所結,云何知解?」—“Look at those in the world who untie knots: if they do not see where it is knotted, how will they know how to untie it?” 〔T19 0122c08〕

The six are the thieves’ go-betweens: 「六為賊媒,自劫家寶」—“these six are the thieves’ go-betweens, robbing the treasures of their own house” 〔T19 0122c10〕

Three fours and four threes: 「三四、四三,宛轉十二;流變三疊,一、十、百、千。」—“three fours and four threes, turning around, make twelve; flowing and changing in three layers—one, ten, hundred, thousand.” 〔T19 0122c18〕

The merits of the six faculties: the six faculties each conclude alike with ‘you should know that the X faculty has only, or is complete with, so many merits’:

FacultyConcluding line
The eye「當知眼唯八百功德」—“you should know that the eye has only eight hundred merits” 〔T19 0122c23〕
The ear「當知耳根圓滿一千二百功德」—“you should know that the ear-faculty is complete with twelve hundred merits” 〔T19 0122c25〕
The nose「當知鼻唯八百功德」—“you should know that the nose has only eight hundred merits” 〔T19 0122c27〕
The tongue「當知舌根圓滿一千二百功德」—“you should know that the tongue-faculty is complete with twelve hundred merits” 〔T19 0122c28〕
The body「當知身唯八百功德」—“you should know that the body has only eight hundred merits” 〔T19 0123a02〕
The mind「當知意根圓滿一千二百功德」—“you should know that the mind-faculty is complete with twelve hundred merits” 〔T19 0123a04〕

The great empty space mixed among many vessels: 「如太虛空參合群器,由器形異名之異空,除器觀空說空為一。」—“It is like the great empty space mixed among many vessels: because the shapes of the vessels differ, it is named different spaces; remove the vessels and look at space, and space is said to be one.” 〔T19 0123a28〕

Similes for the shapes of the six faculties: the six faculties each begin alike with ‘because of the two kinds of appearances, X and Y, Z-ing each other, within the wondrous perfection, adhering to the profound, W arises,’ and each has one simile for its shape:

FacultySimile for its shape
The eye「如蒲萄朵」—“shaped like a grape cluster” 〔T19 0123b05〕
The ear「如新卷葉」—“shaped like a newly rolled leaf” 〔T19 0123b08〕
The nose「如雙垂爪」—“shaped like two hanging claws” 〔T19 0123b10〕
The tongue「如初偃月」—“shaped like a crescent moon just lying down” 〔T19 0123b13〕
The body「如腰鼓顙」—“shaped like the drumhead of a waist-drum” 〔T19 0123b16〕
The mind「如幽室見」—“like seeing things in a dark room” 〔T19 0123b19〕

The examples of the six persons whose faculties function for one another: 「阿那律陀無目而見;跋難陀龍無耳而聽;殑伽神女非鼻聞香;驕梵鉢提異舌知味」—“Aniruddha sees without eyes; the dragon Upananda hears without ears; the goddess of the Gaṅgā smells scents without a nose; Gavāṃpati knows taste with an unusual tongue” 〔T19 0123b29〕; 「舜若多神無身有觸,如來光中映令暫現,既為風質,其體元無」—“the spirit Śūnyatā has touch without a body—illumined within the Tathāgata’s light, it is made to appear for a moment, but being of the substance of wind, its body is originally nonexistent” 〔T19 0123c02〕; 「摩訶迦葉,久滅意根,圓明了知不因心念」—“Mahākāśyapa … has long since extinguished the mind-faculty, yet knows with perfect brightness, not by way of the mind’s thought” 〔T19 0123c04〕

Ice melted by hot water: 「如湯銷氷,應念化成無上知覺」—“like ice melted by hot water, transformed in response to thought into unsurpassed knowing-awareness” 〔T19 0123c07〕

Suddenly closing the eyes and feeling along the body: 「如彼世人聚見於眼,若令急合,暗相現前。」—“It is like a person of the world who gathers his seeing in his eyes: if he suddenly closes his eyes, the appearance of darkness appears before him.” 〔T19 0123c08〕

Striking the bell: 「即時如來勅羅睺羅擊鍾一聲」—“At once the Tathāgata commanded Rāhula to strike the bell once” 〔T19 0123c27〕; below come three rounds asking about hearing and three rounds asking about sound, each concluded with one question, and the Buddha rebukes it as equivocation.

The sound sleeper hearing the pounding and hulling: 「如重睡人眠熟床枕,其家有人於彼睡時擣練、舂米」—“It is like a person sound asleep on his bed and pillow; while he sleeps, someone in his household pounds silk or hulls rice” 〔T19 0124a22〕

VIII. Citation and Carrying Forward

Zixuan’s Commentary on the Śūraṅgama Sūtra with Annotated Text cites and explains this fascicle section by section, judging it under the headings of refuting Pūrṇa’s clinging to appearances in challenging the nature and disclosing the tathāgatagarbha, resolving the particular doubts, Ānanda understanding and asking for the practice, the Tathāgata setting forth cultivation and realization at length, and separately refuting the doubt (I, IV); the outline of this fascicle is carried forward from it.

IX. Placement Among the Recensions

There are fifty-eight collation notes in this fascicle, recorded side by side without adjudication:

  • 〔T19 0119c21〕 The character 𣣋 in 「不相𣣋滅」—“without encroaching upon and destroying each other”: the base text reads 𣣋; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 陵; the glyph printed in the Taishō first printing differs from this.
  • 〔T19 0119c22〕 The character 唯 in 「唯願如來」—“I only ask that the Tathāgata”: the base text reads 唯, and the Korean and Song recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing reads 惟.
  • 〔T19 0120a07〕 The character 所 in 「則無所明」—“then there is nothing that is brightened”: the base text reads 所, and the Qisha Canon and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing and the Korean recension read 無.
  • 〔T19 0120a18〕 The character 蒸 in 「火光上蒸」—“the light of fire steams upward”: the base text reads 蒸; the Ming recension reads 烝.
  • 〔T19 0120b01〕 The character 囉 in 「羯囉藍」—“kalala”: the base text reads 囉; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 羅.
  • 〔T19 0120b11〕 The characters 汝債 in 「我還汝債」—“I repay you a debt”: the base text reads 汝債, and the Qisha Canon and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing and the Korean recension read 債汝.
  • 〔T19 0120b22〕 The character 所 in 「因悟所出」—“does it come out because of awakening”: the base text reads 所; the Ming recension reads 而.
  • 〔T19 0120b29〕 The character 花 in 「見空中花」—“seeing flowers in the sky”: the base text reads 花, and the Korean recension reads the same; the Taishō first printing reads 華.
  • 〔T19 0120c10〕 The character 𣣋 in 「不相𣣋滅」—“without encroaching upon and destroying each other”: the base text reads 𣣋; the glyph printed in the Taishō first printing differs from this.
  • 〔T19 0120c20〕 The character 菓 in 「結為空菓」—“to bear the fruit of the void”: the base text reads 菓, and the Korean recension reads the same; the Taishō first printing reads 果.
  • 〔T19 0120c21〕 The character 𣣋 in 「相𣣋滅義」—“the principle of their encroaching upon and destroying each other”: the base text reads 𣣋; the glyph printed in the Taishō first printing differs from this.
  • 〔T19 0121a14〕 The character 鉢 in 「非鉢剌若」—“not prajñā”: the base text reads 鉢; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 般.
  • 〔T19 0121a22〕 The character 鉢 in 「即鉢剌若」—“is prajñā”: the base text reads 鉢; the Yuan and Ming recensions read 般.
  • 〔T19 0121a24〕 The characters 即俱 in 「以是即俱世出世故」—“because it is each and every one of them all, worldly and world-transcending”: the base text reads 即俱; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 俱即.
  • 〔T19 0121c08〕 The character 犍 in 「大目犍連」—“Mahāmaudgalyāyana”: the base text reads 犍; the Song recension reads 揵.
  • 〔T19 0121c11〕 The character 唯 in 「唯垂大悲」—“I only ask that you bestow your great compassion”: the base text reads 唯, and the Korean and Song recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing reads 惟.
  • 〔T19 0122a01〕 The character 薰 in 「多聞薰習」—“the perfuming of this learning”: the base text reads 薰, and the Korean recension reads the same; the Taishō first printing reads 熏.
  • 〔T19 0122a02〕 The character 須 in 「須待我」—“had to wait for my”: the base text reads 須, and the Qisha Canon and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing reads 因.
  • 〔T19 0122a06〕 The character 銷 in 「銷其愛欲」—“her desire of love was dissolved”: the base text reads 銷, and the Korean recension reads the same; the Taishō first printing reads 鎖.
  • 〔T19 0122a07〕 The character 羅 in 「羅睺羅母」—“the mother of Rāhula”: the base text has this 羅; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions lack it.
  • 〔T19 0122a18〕 The character 以 in 「賜以華屋」—“the gift of a splendid house”: the base text reads 以; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 與.
  • 〔T19 0122a19〕 The character 畢 in 「畢獲」—“in the end obtain”: the base text reads 畢, and the Qisha Canon and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing and the Korean recension read 必.
  • 〔T19 0122a25〕 The character 提 in 「提心,開無上乘」—“… mind, opened up the … of the unsurpassed vehicle”: the base text reads 提, and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing reads 薩.
  • 〔T19 0122b12〕 The character 汩 in 「容貌汩然」—“its appearance becomes murky and disordered”: the base text reads 汩; the Taishō first printing reads 汨.
  • 〔T19 0122b12〕 The character 名 in 「名之為濁」—“this is named turbidity”: the base text reads 名, and the Korean recension and the Qisha Canon read the same; the Taishō first printing reads 明.
  • 〔T19 0122b16〕 The character 壅 in 「壅令留礙」—“are blocked and made obstructive”: the base text reads 壅; the Korean recension reads 擁.
  • 〔T19 0122b26〕 The character 伏 in 「伏還元覺」—“subdue it and return to the original awakening”: the base text reads 伏; the Ming recension reads 復.
  • 〔T19 0122b28〕 The character 淨 in 「貯於淨器」—“store it in a pure vessel”: the base text reads 淨; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 靜.
  • 〔T19 0122c09〕 The character 隳 in 「被汝隳裂」—“being torn apart by you”: the base text reads 隳, and the Korean recension reads the same; the Taishō first printing reads 墮.
  • 〔T19 0122c09〕 The characters 相形 in 「空無相形」—“space has no appearance or form”: the base text reads 相形; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 形相.
  • 〔T19 0122c15〕 The characters 方位 in 「方位有十」—“the directions are ten”: the base text reads 方位, and the Qisha Canon and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing reads 位方.
  • 〔T19 0122c22〕 The character 傍 in 「左、右傍觀」—“looking sideways to left and right”: the base text reads 傍; the Ming recension reads 旁.
  • 〔T19 0122c24〕 The character 靜 in 「靜無邊際」—“in stillness it is without boundary”: the base text reads 靜, and the Korean recension reads the same; the Taishō first printing reads 諍.
  • 〔T19 0122c26〕 The character 鼻 in 「驗於鼻根」—“examining the nose-faculty”: the base text reads 鼻, and the Qisha Canon and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing reads 耳.
  • 〔T19 0123a01〕 The character 身 in 「驗於身」—“examining the body”: the base text reads 身, and the Qisha Canon and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing reads 舌.
  • 〔T19 0123a03〕 The character 惟 in 「惟聖與凡」—“whether sagely or ordinary”: the base text reads 惟; the Song recension reads 唯.
  • 〔T19 0123a20〕 The character 劑 in 「滅分劑頭數」—“… perishing, the divisions and number”: the base text reads 劑; the Ming recension reads 齊.
  • 〔T19 0123b03〕 The character 粘 in 「粘湛發見」—“adhering to the profound, seeing arises”: the base text reads 粘; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 黏.
  • 〔T19 0123b06〕 The character 粘 in 「粘湛發聽」—“adhering to the profound, hearing arises”: the base text reads 粘; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 黏.
  • 〔T19 0123b09〕 The character 粘 in 「粘湛發嗅」—“adhering to the profound, smelling arises”: the base text reads 粘; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 黏.
  • 〔T19 0123b12〕 The character 粘 in 「粘湛發嘗」—“adhering to the profound, tasting arises”: the base text reads 粘; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 黏.
  • 〔T19 0123b15〕 The character 粘 in 「粘湛發覺」—“adhering to the profound, feeling arises”: the base text reads 粘; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 黏.
  • 〔T19 0123b15〕 The character 搏 in 「搏觸成根」—“grasping touch, it forms the faculty”: the base text reads 搏; the Qisha Canon, the Palace edition, and the Jiaxing Canon read 摶.
  • 〔T19 0123b18〕 The character 粘 in 「粘湛發知」—“adhering to the profound, knowing arises”: the base text reads 粘; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 黏.
  • 〔T19 0123b18〕 The character 覽 in 「覽法成根」—“surveying dharmas, it forms the faculty”: the base text reads 覽; the Ming recension reads 攬.
  • 〔T19 0123b21〕 The character 粘 in 「粘妄發光」—“they adhere to falsity and give forth light”: the base text reads 粘; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 黏.
  • 〔T19 0123b25〕 The characters 暗明 in 「生滅、暗明」—“arising and perishing, darkness and brightness”: the base text reads 暗明; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 明暗.
  • 〔T19 0123b26〕 The character 粘 in 「脫粘內伏」—“free it from adhesion and subdue it inwardly”: the base text reads 粘; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 黏.
  • 〔T19 0123b27〕 The character 粘 in 「諸餘五粘」—“the other five adhesions”: the base text reads 粘; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 黏.
  • 〔T19 0123c03〕 The character 有 in 「無身有觸」—“has touch without a body”: the base text reads 有; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 覺.
  • 〔T19 0123c10〕 The character 辯 in 「頭足一辯」—“distinguishes head and feet one by one”: the base text reads 辯; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 辨.
  • 〔T19 0123c17〕 The characters 暗明 in 「離於暗明」—“apart from darkness and brightness”: the base text reads 暗明; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 明暗.
  • 〔T19 0123c24〕 The character 唯 in 「唯垂大慈」—“I only ask that you bestow your great compassion”: the base text reads 唯, and the Korean and Song recensions read the same; the Taishō first printing reads 惟.
  • 〔T19 0124a06〕 The characters 大眾俱言 in 「阿難、大眾俱言」—“Ānanda and the great assembly all said”: the base text reads 大眾俱言, and the Qisha Canon reads the same; the Taishō first printing reads 言, and the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 大眾俱言有.
  • 〔T19 0124a06〕 The character 有 in 「有聲」—“There is sound”: the base text has this character, and the Qisha Canon reads the same; the Taishō first printing lacks it.
  • 〔T19 0124a14〕 The character 惟 in 「惟聞與聲」—“only, about hearing and sound”: the base text reads 惟; the Song recension reads 唯.
  • 〔T19 0124a24〕 The character 復 in 「或復撞鍾」—“or the striking of a bell”: the base text reads 復; the Yuan and Ming recensions read 為.
  • 〔T19 0124b03〕 The characters 塵根 in 「塵根、識心」—“the dusts and faculties and the cognizing mind”: the base text reads 塵根; the Song, Yuan, and Ming recensions read 根塵.

The fascicle title and the attribution: in this fascicle the Taishō text has no collation notes on the fascicle title, the interlinear note on its other name, or the single line of the attribution.

Character forms: the only rare character in this fascicle is 「𣣋」, seen three times (〔T19 0119c21〕, 〔T19 0120c10〕, 〔T19 0120c21〕), recorded as in the base text. 「呪」, 「鍾」, 「倐」, 「瞖」, 「潬」, 「惓」, 「囉」, 「蒱」, 「菓」, 「氷」, 「于」, 「秖」, and 「粘」 are all recorded as in the base text.

X. Taishō Head-Notes and Variants of the Alternate Recensions

① This fascicle has eighty-one head-notes and collation notes in all: thirty-three Taishō head-notes, thirty-three [CBETA collation] notes corresponding to them, and fifteen further [CBETA collation] notes (two of them remarks). The Taishō head-notes are copied word for word; the character differences of the [CBETA collation] notes against them are recorded alongside in the last column:

AnchorNote no.Taishō head-note[CBETA collation]
〔T19 0119c21〕0119009𣣋=陵【三】* — 𣣋 reads 陵 in the three recensions, likewise where it recurs𣣋【大】*,陵【宋】*【元】*【明】* — 𣣋 in the Taishō; 陵 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming, likewise where it recurs
〔T19 0119c22〕0119010惟=唯【宋】 — 惟 reads 唯 in the Song唯【CB】【麗-CB】【宋】,惟【大】 — 唯 in the CB text, the Korean, and the Song; 惟 in the Taishō
〔T19 0120a07〕0120001無=所【三】 — 無 reads 所 in the three recensions所【CB】【磧-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,無【大】,無【麗-CB】 — 所 in the CB text, the Qisha, and the Song, Yuan, and Ming; 無 in the Taishō; 無 in the Korean
〔T19 0120a18〕0120002蒸=烝【明】 — 蒸 reads 烝 in the Ming蒸【大】,烝【明】 — 蒸 in the Taishō; 烝 in the Ming
〔T19 0120b01〕0120003囉=羅【三】 — 囉 reads 羅 in the three recensions囉【大】,羅【宋】【元】【明】 — 囉 in the Taishō; 羅 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming
〔T19 0120b11〕0120004債汝=汝債【三】 — 債汝 reads 汝債 in the three recensions汝債【CB】【磧-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,債汝【大】,債汝【麗-CB】 — 汝債 in the CB text, the Qisha, and the Song, Yuan, and Ming; 債汝 in the Taishō; 債汝 in the Korean
〔T19 0120b22〕0120005所=而【明】 — 所 reads 而 in the Ming所【大】,而【明】 — 所 in the Taishō; 而 in the Ming
〔T19 0120b29〕0120b2901([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)花【CB】【麗-CB】,華【大】 — 花 in the CB text and the Korean; 華 in the Taishō
〔T19 0120c10〕0120c1001([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)𣣋【CB】,(a rare glyph of the Taishō first printing)【大】 — 𣣋 in the CB text; a rare glyph of the Taishō first printing in the Taishō
〔T19 0120c20〕0120c2001([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)菓【CB】【麗-CB】,果【大】 — 菓 in the CB text and the Korean; 果 in the Taishō
〔T19 0120c21〕0120c2101([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)𣣋【CB】,(a rare glyph of the Taishō first printing)【大】 — 𣣋 in the CB text; a rare glyph of the Taishō first printing in the Taishō
〔T19 0121a11〕0121a1201([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)[CBETA collation: the text before and after all takes the sentence pattern 「非A非B非C,非D、非E、F、G……」—“not A, not B, not C; not D, not E, F, G …”; this place should mean 「非明、非無明、非明盡、非無明盡」—“not brightness, not ignorance, not the ending of brightness, not the ending of ignorance”.]
〔T19 0121a14〕0121001鉢=般【三】 — 鉢 reads 般 in the three recensions鉢【大】,般【宋】【元】【明】 — 鉢 in the Taishō; 般 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming
〔T19 0121a19〕0121a2001([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)[CBETA collation: this place should mean 「即明、即無明、即明盡、即無明盡」—“is brightness, is ignorance, is the ending of brightness, is the ending of ignorance”.]
〔T19 0121a22〕0121002鉢=般【元】【明】 — 鉢 reads 般 in the Yuan and Ming鉢【大】,般【元】【明】 — 鉢 in the Taishō; 般 in the Yuan and Ming
〔T19 0121a24〕0121003即俱=俱即【三】 — 即俱 reads 俱即 in the three recensions即俱【大】,俱即【宋】【元】【明】 — 即俱 in the Taishō; 俱即 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming
〔T19 0121c08〕0121004犍=揵【宋】 — 犍 reads 揵 in the Song犍【大】,揵【宋】 — 犍 in the Taishō; 揵 in the Song
〔T19 0121c11〕0121005惟=唯【宋】* — 惟 reads 唯 in the Song, likewise where it recurs唯【CB】【麗-CB】【宋】*,惟【大】* — 唯 in the CB text, the Korean, and the Song; 惟 in the Taishō; likewise where it recurs
〔T19 0122a01〕0122a0101([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)薰【CB】【麗-CB】,熏【大】 — 薰 in the CB text and the Korean; 熏 in the Taishō
〔T19 0122a02〕0122001因=須【三】 — 因 reads 須 in the three recensions須【CB】【磧乙-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,因【大】 — 須 in the CB text, the Qisha, and the Song, Yuan, and Ming; 因 in the Taishō
〔T19 0122a06〕0122a0601([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)銷【CB】【麗-CB】,鎖【大】 — 銷 in the CB text and the Korean; 鎖 in the Taishō
〔T19 0122a07〕0122002〔羅〕-【三】 — 羅 absent in the three recensions羅【大】,〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】 — present in the Taishō; absent in the Song, Yuan, and Ming
〔T19 0122a18〕0122003以=與【三】 — 以 reads 與 in the three recensions以【大】,與【宋】【元】【明】 — 以 in the Taishō; 與 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming
〔T19 0122a19〕0122004必=畢【三】 — 必 reads 畢 in the three recensions畢【CB】【磧-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,必【大】,必【麗-CB】 — 畢 in the CB text, the Qisha, and the Song, Yuan, and Ming; 必 in the Taishō; 必 in the Korean
〔T19 0122a25〕0122005薩=提【三】 — 薩 reads 提 in the three recensions提【CB】【宋】【元】【明】,薩【大】 — 提 in the CB text and the Song, Yuan, and Ming; 薩 in the Taishō
〔T19 0122b12〕0122b1201([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)汩【CB】,汨【大】 — 汩 in the CB text; 汨 in the Taishō
〔T19 0122b12〕0122b1202([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)名【CB】【麗-CB】【磧乙-CB】,明【大】 — 名 in the CB text, the Korean, and the Qisha; 明 in the Taishō
〔T19 0122b16〕0122b1601([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)壅【大】,擁【麗-CB】 — 壅 in the Taishō; 擁 in the Korean
〔T19 0122b26〕0122006伏=復【明】 — 伏 reads 復 in the Ming伏【大】,復【明】 — 伏 in the Taishō; 復 in the Ming
〔T19 0122b28〕0122007淨=靜【三】 — 淨 reads 靜 in the three recensions淨【大】,靜【宋】【元】【明】 — 淨 in the Taishō; 靜 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming
〔T19 0122c09〕0122008相形=形相【三】 — 相形 reads 形相 in the three recensions相形【大】,形相【宋】【元】【明】 — 相形 in the Taishō; 形相 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming
〔T19 0122c09〕0122c0901([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)隳【CB】【麗-CB】,墮【大】 — 隳 in the CB text and the Korean; 墮 in the Taishō
〔T19 0122c15〕0122009位方=方位【三】 — 位方 reads 方位 in the three recensions方位【CB】【磧乙-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,位方【大】 — 方位 in the CB text, the Qisha, and the Song, Yuan, and Ming; 位方 in the Taishō
〔T19 0122c22〕0122010傍=旁【明】 — 傍 reads 旁 in the Ming傍【大】,旁【明】 — 傍 in the Taishō; 旁 in the Ming
〔T19 0122c24〕0122c2401([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)靜【CB】【麗-CB】,諍【大】 — 靜 in the CB text and the Korean; 諍 in the Taishō
〔T19 0122c26〕0122011耳=鼻【三】 — 耳 reads 鼻 in the three recensions鼻【CB】【磧乙-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,耳【大】 — 鼻 in the CB text, the Qisha, and the Song, Yuan, and Ming; 耳 in the Taishō
〔T19 0123a01〕0123001舌=身【三】 — 舌 reads 身 in the three recensions身【CB】【磧乙-CB】【宋】【元】【明】,舌【大】 — 身 in the CB text, the Qisha, and the Song, Yuan, and Ming; 舌 in the Taishō
〔T19 0123a20〕0123002劑=齊【明】 — 劑 reads 齊 in the Ming劑【大】,齊【明】 — 劑 in the Taishō; 齊 in the Ming
〔T19 0123b03〕0123003粘=黏【三】* — 粘 reads 黏 in the three recensions, likewise where it recurs粘【大】*,黏【宋】*【元】*【明】* — 粘 in the Taishō; 黏 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming, likewise where it recurs
〔T19 0123b15〕0123b1501([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)搏【大】,摶【磧乙-CB】【宮-CB】【嘉興乙-CB】 — 搏 in the Taishō; 摶 in the Qisha, the Palace edition, and the Jiaxing Canon
〔T19 0123b18〕0123004覽=攬【明】 — 覽 reads 攬 in the Ming覽【大】,攬【明】 — 覽 in the Taishō; 攬 in the Ming
〔T19 0123b25〕0123005暗明=明暗【三】* — 暗明 reads 明暗 in the three recensions, likewise where it recurs暗明【大】*,明暗【宋】*【元】*【明】* — 暗明 in the Taishō; 明暗 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming, likewise where it recurs
〔T19 0123c03〕0123006有=覺【三】 — 有 reads 覺 in the three recensions有【大】,覺【宋】【元】【明】 — 有 in the Taishō; 覺 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming
〔T19 0123c10〕0123007辯=辨【三】 — 辯 reads 辨 in the three recensions辯【大】,辨【宋】【元】【明】 — 辯 in the Taishō; 辨 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming
〔T19 0124a06〕0124001言=大眾俱言有【三】 — 言 reads 大眾俱言有 in the three recensions大眾俱言【CB】【磧乙-CB】,言【大】,大眾俱言有【宋】【元】【明】 — 大眾俱言 in the CB text and the Qisha; 言 in the Taishō; 大眾俱言有 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming
〔T19 0124a06〕0124a0601([CBETA collation] note; the Taishō has no head-note)有【CB】【磧乙-CB】,〔-〕【大】 — present in the CB text and the Qisha; absent in the Taishō
〔T19 0124a24〕0124002復=為【元】【明】 — 復 reads 為 in the Yuan and Ming復【大】,為【元】【明】 — 復 in the Taishō; 為 in the Yuan and Ming
〔T19 0124b03〕0124003塵根=根塵【三】 — 塵根 reads 根塵 in the three recensions塵根【大】,根塵【宋】【元】【明】 — 塵根 in the Taishō; 根塵 in the Song, Yuan, and Ming

In the table, 【三】 = the three recensions Song, Yuan, and Ming; * = the same note holds where the character recurs below.

② The Taishō has no notes from other recensions.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing. The full statement of AI's role across the 指月 project is maintained at methodology.

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0