楞伽阿跋多羅寶經 卷首 · 宋人序
之奇嘗苦《楞伽經》難讀又難得善本,會南都太子太保致政張公施此經,而眉山蘇子瞻為書而刻之板,以為金山常住。金山長老佛印大師了元持以見寄,之奇為之言曰:佛之所說經總十二部,而其多至於五千卷。方其正法流行之時,人有聞半偈、得一句而悟入者,蓋不可為量數。至於像法、末法之後,去聖既遠,人始溺於文字,有入海算沙之困,而於一真之體乃漫不省解,於是有祖師出焉,直指人心見性成佛,以為教外別傳,於動容發語之頃,而上根利器之人已目擊而得之矣。故雲門至於罵佛,而藥山至戒人不得讀經,皆此意也。由是去佛而謂之禪,離義而謂之玄,故學佛者必詆禪而諱義者,亦必宗玄二家之徒更相非而不知其相為用也。且禪者六度之一也,顧豈異於佛哉? 之奇以為,禪出於佛,而玄出於義,不以佛廢禪,不以玄廢義,則其近之矣。冉求問:「聞斯行諸?」孔子曰:「聞斯行之。」子路問:「聞斯行諸?」曰:「有父兄在。如之何?」其聞斯行之,求也退故進之,由也兼人故退之。說豈有常哉?救其偏而已。學佛之敝至於溺經文、惑句義而人不體玄,則言禪以救之;學禪之敝至於馳空言、玩琦辯而人不了義,則言佛以救之。二者更相救,而佛法完矣。 昔達磨西來,既已傳心印於二祖,且云:「吾有《楞伽經》四卷,亦用付汝。即是如來心地要門,令諸眾生開示悟入。」此亦佛與禪並傳而玄與義俱付也。至五祖始易以《金剛經》傳授,故六祖聞客讀《金剛經》而問其所從來。客云:「我從蘄州黃梅縣東五祖山來。五祖大師常勸僧俗,但持《金剛經》即自見性成佛矣。」則是持《金剛經》者始於五祖。故《金剛》以是盛行於世,而《楞伽》遂無傳焉。 今之傳者,寔自張公倡之。之奇過南都謁張公,親聞公說《楞伽》因緣。始張公自三司使翰林學士出守滁,一日入琅琊僧舍,見一經函發而視之,乃《楞伽經》也。恍然覺其前生之所書,筆畫宛然,其殆神先受之甚明也。之奇聞:羊叔子五歲時,令乳母取所弄金鐶。乳母謂之:「汝初無是物。」祜即自詣隣人李氏東垣桑木中探得之。主人驚曰:「此吾亡兒所失物也。云何持去?」乳母具言之,知祜之前身為李氏子也。白樂天始生七月,姆指之無兩字,雖試百數不差;九歲諳識聲律,史氏以為篤於才章蓋天稟,然而樂天固自以為宿習之緣矣。 人之以是一真不滅之性,而死生去來於天地之間。其為世數,雖折天下之草木以為籌箸,不能算之矣。然以淪於死生,神識疲耗不能復記,惟圓明不昧之人知焉。有如張公以高文大冊再中制舉登侍從,秉鈞軸出入朝廷逾四十年,風烈事業播人耳目,則其前身嘗為大善知識,無足疑者。其能記憶前世之事,豈不謂信然哉。故因讀《楞伽》新經,而記其因緣於經之端云。 《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》——先佛所說微妙第一真實了義,故謂之佛語心品。祖師達磨以付二祖曰:「吾觀震旦所有經教,惟《楞伽》四卷可以印心。」祖祖相授,以為心法。如醫之《難經》,句句皆理、字字皆法。後世達者神而明之,如盤走珠、如珠走盤,無不可者。若出新意,而棄舊學以為無用,非愚無知,則狂而已。近歲學者各宗其師,務從簡便,得一句一偈,自謂了證,至使婦人孺子抵掌嬉笑爭談禪悅。高者為名,下者為利,餘波末流無所不至,而佛法微矣。譬如俚俗醫師,不由經論直授方藥以之療病,非不或中;至於遇病,輒應懸斷死生,則與知經學古者不可同日語矣。世人徒見其有一至之功,或捷於古人,因謂《難經》不學而可,豈不誤哉! 《楞伽》義輒幽𦕈,文字簡古。讀者或不能句,而況遺文以得義,忘義以了心者乎?此其所以寂寥於世,幾廢而僅存也。太子太保樂全先生張公安道,以廣大心,得清淨覺。慶曆中嘗為滁州,至一僧舍,偶見此經,入手恍然如獲舊物。開卷未終,夙障冰解,細視筆畫,手迹宛然。悲喜太息,從是悟入,常以經首四偈發明心要。軾遊於公之門三十年矣,今年二月過南都,見公於私第。公時年七十九,幻滅都盡,惠光渾圜,而軾亦老於憂患百念灰冷。公以為可教者,乃授此經,且以錢三十萬使印施於江淮間。而金山長老佛印大師了元曰:「印施有盡,若書而刻之則無盡。」軾乃為書之,而元使其侍者曉機走錢塘,求善工刻之板,遂以為金山常住。 元豐八年九月九日
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
此為宋人為《楞伽》所作之序(蔣之奇撰·蘇軾書·元豐八年),非經文正說。原序為四卷本《楞伽》流傳於世之緣起,並載達磨以四卷楞伽印心之事。人名、書名、典故一仍其舊。
蔣之奇 序
我(之奇)向來苦於《楞伽經》既難讀、又難得到好本子。恰逢南都的太子太保、已致仕的張公(張安道)施刊此經,而眉山的蘇子瞻(蘇軾)為它書寫、刻成經板,安置在金山寺作為常住之物。金山寺的長老佛印大師了元,把這刻本拿來寄給我。我便為它說道:佛所說的經,總共十二部,多到五千卷。當正法流行的時候,有人聽到半偈、得到一句就悟入的,多得無法計數。到了像法、末法之後,離聖人已遠,人們才開始沉溺於文字,陷入「入海算沙」那樣的困境,而對那「一真」之體反倒茫然不能理解。於是有祖師出世,直指人心、見性成佛,作為教外別傳;在一舉一動、一言一語之間,上根利器的人已當下目擊而得。所以雲門甚至到了罵佛,藥山甚至告誡人不要讀經,都是這個用意。由此,離開佛而稱之為「禪」,離開義理而稱之為「玄」;於是學佛的人一定詆毀禪,而諱言義理的人,也一定崇尚玄——兩家之徒互相非難,卻不知彼此本是相輔為用的。況且禪本是六度之一,難道與佛有什麼不同嗎?
我以為:禪出於佛,玄出於義;不因為重佛而廢禪,不因為重玄而廢義,這就接近了。冉求問孔子:「聽到了就去做嗎?」孔子說:「聽到了就去做。」子路問:「聽到了就去做嗎?」孔子卻說:「有父兄在,怎能自作主張就去做呢?」同樣一句「聽到了就去做」——冉求性子退縮,所以孔子鼓勵他進取;子路好勇過人,所以孔子要他退讓。說法哪裡有一定?不過是各救其偏罷了。學佛的弊病,到了沉溺經文、迷惑句義而人不體悟玄旨,就用禪來救它;學禪的弊病,到了空談玄言、玩弄巧辯而人不通了義理,就用佛來救它。二者互相救治,佛法就完備了。
從前達磨西來,既已把心印傳給二祖(慧可),並且說:「我有《楞伽經》四卷,也一併付囑給你。這就是如來心地的要門,能令一切眾生開示悟入。」這也正是佛與禪一同傳授、玄與義一併付囑啊。到了五祖,才改以《金剛經》傳授,所以六祖聽到客人讀《金剛經》,便問他從何處來。客人說:「我從蘄州黃梅縣東邊的五祖山來。五祖大師常勸僧俗,只要持誦《金剛經》,就能自見本性、成佛。」可見持《金剛經》是從五祖開始的。因此《金剛經》由此盛行於世,而《楞伽經》就漸漸沒有傳承了。
如今《楞伽》之所以重新流傳,實在是張公倡導的。我路過南都拜謁張公,親耳聽他說《楞伽》的因緣。當初張公由三司使、翰林學士出任滁州太守,一天走進琅琊寺的僧舍,見到一個經函,打開一看,正是《楞伽經》。他恍然覺得這是自己前生所書寫的,筆畫宛然如舊——這大概是他的神識前世早已領受過,明明白白。我聽說:羊叔子(羊祜)五歲時,叫乳母去取他所玩的金環。乳母說:「你本來就沒有這件東西。」羊祜便自己走到鄰居李家東牆的桑樹中,探取而得。主人吃驚地說:「這是我亡兒失落的東西,怎麼被你拿走了?」乳母把經過都說了,才知道羊祜的前身是李家的兒子。白樂天(白居易)出生才七個月,乳母指著「之」「無」兩個字教他,即使試上百次也不會認錯;九歲就通曉聲律。史家以為他篤於文才是天生稟賦,然而樂天自己一向認為,那是宿世熏習的因緣。
人正因為有這「一真不滅」之性,才在天地之間有生有死、有來有去。其間所經歷的世數,即使折盡天下的草木來做籌碼,也算不完。只是因為淪落於生死之中,神識疲耗,不能再記得;唯有那圓明不昧的人才能知道。像張公,以宏文大冊兩度考中制舉、位登侍從,執掌朝政、出入朝廷四十多年,功業風烈為人耳目所傳——那麼他的前身曾是大善知識,是不必懷疑的了。他能記得前世的事,難道不正說明這是真實的嗎?所以我因讀《楞伽》新刻之經,把這段因緣記在經的卷端。
蘇軾 序
《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》,是先佛所說微妙、第一、真實、了義之法,所以稱它為「佛語心品」。祖師達磨把它付囑二祖說:「我看震旦(中國)所有的經教,只有《楞伽》四卷可以印心。」祖祖相傳,把它當作心法。它就像醫家的《難經》,句句都是道理、字字都是法則。後世通達的人神而明之,如同盤上走珠、珠上走盤,無不通達自如。若自出新意、而拋棄舊學以為無用,那不是愚昧無知,就是狂妄罷了。近年來學者各自宗奉其師,只圖簡便,得了一句一偈,就自以為了悟證得,甚至使婦人小孩都拍掌嬉笑、爭談禪悅。高的為名、低的為利,末流餘波無所不至,佛法就衰微了。譬如鄉里的庸俗醫師,不依經論、直接授人藥方去治病,未必不偶爾治中;可是一遇重病,動不動就妄斷人的生死,那就和通曉醫經、研習古法的人不可同日而語了。世人只見他偶有一時之功、或比古人來得快捷,就說《難經》不學也可以——豈不是大錯嗎!
《楞伽》的義理幽深,文字簡古。讀的人有時連句讀都斷不開,何況要撇開文字去領會義理、忘掉義理去了悟本心呢?這正是它之所以在世上寂寥冷落、幾乎廢絕而僅存的緣故。太子太保、樂全先生張公安道,以廣大之心,得清淨之覺。慶曆年間他曾任滁州太守,到一處僧舍,偶然見到此經,一入手便恍然如同尋回舊物。經卷還沒讀完,多生的宿障已如冰消解;細看筆畫,竟是自己的手跡宛然。他悲喜交集、長歎不已,從此悟入,常以經首的四偈發明心要。我(蘇軾)在張公門下交遊已三十年了,今年二月路過南都,在他私宅相見。張公當時年七十九,浮幻消滅殆盡,慧光渾然圓滿;而我也在憂患中老去、百念灰冷。張公認為我還可教,就把此經授予我,並且拿出三十萬錢,讓我在江淮一帶印施流通。金山長老佛印大師了元說:「印施的本子總有印完之時,若書寫而刻成經板,就流傳無盡了。」我便為它書寫,了元又派他的侍者曉機趕往錢塘,尋訪好的刻工刻成經板,於是安置在金山寺作為常住之物。
元豐八年九月九日。
This is a preface composed by Song-dynasty literati for the Laṅkāvatāra (written by Jiang Zhiqi, in the calligraphy of Su Shi, in the eighth year of the Yuanfeng era, 1085) — not the scripture's own teaching. The original preface tells how the four-scroll Laṅkāvatāra came to circulate in the world, and records how Bodhidharma sealed the mind with the four-scroll Laṅkā. Personal names, book titles, and allusions are kept as they stand.
Preface by Jiang Zhiqi
I (Zhiqi) have long suffered that the Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra is both hard to read and hard to obtain in a good edition. It happened that the Grand Guardian of the Heir Apparent, the retired Lord Zhang of the Southern Capital (Zhang Andao), had this scripture cut for printing, and that Su Zizhan (Su Shi) of Meishan wrote it out and had the printing-blocks carved, to be housed at Jinshan Monastery as its permanent possession. The elder of Jinshan, the great master Foyin, Liaoyuan, took this carved edition and sent it to me. And so I speak of it thus: the scriptures the Buddha taught number, in all, twelve divisions, running to as many as five thousand scrolls. In the age when the True Dharma flourished, those who heard half a verse or caught a single line and thereupon entered awakening were beyond counting. But after the ages of the Semblance and the Final Dharma, far removed from the sages, people began to drown in the written word and to fall into the plight of "counting the sands of the sea," while toward that substance of "the One Real" they grew blank and unable to understand. Then the Patriarchs appeared in the world, pointing directly at the human mind — see your nature and become a Buddha — as a separate transmission outside the teaching; and within a single gesture, a single word, those of the sharpest, highest capacity had already grasped it on the spot. This is why Yunmen went so far as to revile the Buddha, and Yaoshan so far as to warn people not to read the scriptures — both had just this intent. From this, departing from the Buddha, one came to call it "Chan"; departing from the doctrine, one came to call it "the Mysterious." And so the student of the Buddha is sure to disparage Chan, while the one who is shy of doctrine is sure to exalt the Mysterious — the followers of the two houses reproach each other, not knowing that the two were from the first mutually of use. Besides, Chan is itself one of the six perfections — how could it be anything different from the Buddha?
I hold that Chan issues from the Buddha, and the Mysterious issues from doctrine; not to discard Chan out of esteem for the Buddha, and not to discard doctrine out of esteem for the Mysterious — this comes near the mark. Ran Qiu asked Confucius, "On hearing a thing, should one do it?" Confucius said, "On hearing it, do it." Zilu asked, "On hearing a thing, should one do it?" But Confucius said, "While one's father and elder brothers are alive, how can one, on one's own judgment, simply go and do it?" One and the same line, "on hearing it, do it" — Ran Qiu's temper was to shrink back, and so Confucius urged him forward; Zilu's courage outran others, and so Confucius made him yield. Where is teaching ever fixed? It is only a matter of remedying each one's particular excess. When the malady of the student of the Buddha reaches drowning in the scriptural text and being confounded by the sense of the phrases so that a person does not realize the Mysterious purport, then one uses Chan to remedy it; when the malady of the student of Chan reaches empty talk of the Mysterious and toying with clever debate so that a person does not penetrate the doctrine's meaning, then one uses the Buddha to remedy it. The two remedying each other, the Buddha-dharma is made complete.
Long ago Bodhidharma came from the West, and having transmitted the mind-seal to the Second Patriarch (Huike), he further said: "I have the four scrolls of the Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra, and these too I entrust to you. This is the essential gate to the Tathāgata's mind-ground, able to make all sentient beings reveal, awaken to, and enter it." This is precisely the Buddha and Chan transmitted together, the Mysterious and doctrine entrusted as one. It was only at the Fifth Patriarch that the transmission was changed to the Diamond Sūtra, which is why the Sixth Patriarch, hearing a traveler recite the Diamond Sūtra, asked him where he had come from. The traveler said: "I come from Mount of the Fifth Patriarch, east of Huangmei county in Qizhou. The great master, the Fifth Patriarch, constantly exhorts monks and laity that if they will but hold and recite the Diamond Sūtra, they can see their own nature and become Buddhas." One sees that the holding of the Diamond Sūtra began with the Fifth Patriarch. From this the Diamond Sūtra thereupon flourished in the world, while the Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra gradually lost its transmission.
That the Laṅkāvatāra now circulates anew is truly owing to Lord Zhang's championing of it. Passing through the Southern Capital, I paid my respects to Lord Zhang and heard from his own lips the circumstances of the Laṅkāvatāra. Long ago, when Lord Zhang went out from Commissioner of the Three Finance Offices and Hanlin Academician to be Prefect of Chuzhou, he walked one day into the monks' quarters at Langya Monastery, saw a scripture-case, opened it and looked — and it was precisely the Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra. He was struck with the sudden sense that this was what he himself had written out in a former life, the very strokes of the brush plainly as of old — this was surely because his spirit-consciousness had received and held it in a former life, clear beyond doubt. I have heard: when Yang Shuzi (Yang Hu) was five years old, he told his wet-nurse to fetch the gold ring he used to play with. The nurse said, "You never had any such thing." Yang Hu then went himself to the mulberry tree by the east wall of the neighboring Li family, reached into it and drew it out. The master of the house said in astonishment, "This is what my dead son lost — how has it come into your hands?" The nurse told the whole story, and only then was it known that Yang Hu's former body had been the Li family's son. When Bai Letian (Bai Juyi) was born, barely seven months old, his nurse pointed out the two graphs 之 and 無 and taught him, and though tried a hundred times he would not mistake them; at nine he had mastered the rules of prosody. The historians held that his devotion to letters was an inborn endowment; yet Letian himself always held it to be the causal perfuming of former lives.
It is precisely because a person has this nature of "the One Real that does not perish" that, between heaven and earth, there is for him being-born and dying, coming and going. The number of world-ages passed through in the meantime could not be counted out though one used up all the grasses and trees of the world for counting-rods. It is only because, sunk in birth-and-death, the spirit-consciousness is worn out and exhausted, that one can no longer remember; only one who is perfectly clear and unclouded can know it. As for Lord Zhang, who twice passed the special examination with grand compositions and rose to the ranks of the attendant officials, who held the reins of government and came and went at court for more than forty years, whose achievements and stern brilliance are handed down by ear and eye — that his former body was a great and good spiritual guide is therefore not to be doubted. That he can remember the affairs of a former life — does this not precisely show that it is real? And so, on the occasion of reading the newly-carved scripture of the Laṅkāvatāra, I have set down these circumstances at the head of the scroll.
Preface by Su Shi
The Laṅkāvatāra-ratna-sūtra is the subtle, foremost, real, and definitive-meaning dharma taught by the former Buddha, and so it is called "the Chapter on the Heart of All Buddha-Word." The Patriarch Bodhidharma entrusted it to the Second Patriarch, saying: "I have looked over all the scriptures and teachings in Cīnasthāna, and only the four scrolls of the Laṅkāvatāra can seal the mind." Patriarch handed it to Patriarch, taking it as the mind-dharma. It is like the physicians' Classic of Difficulties: every line is a principle, every word a rule. Later masters who penetrated it grew wondrously clear in it, like a pearl running on a plate and the plate running under the pearl — nowhere not free and unobstructed. But to put forth new notions of one's own and cast aside the old learning as useless — that is, if not benighted ignorance, then reckless arrogance. In recent years, students each revere their own master and seek only ease; having got a single line or verse, they take themselves to have awakened and realized, to the point of making women and children clap their hands and laugh and vie in chattering of the joys of Chan. The higher sort do it for fame, the lower for gain; the dregs of the current run to every excess, and the Buddha-dharma has grown weak. It is like the vulgar physician of the villages who, without relying on the medical classics, hands people a prescription directly to treat illness: he may not fail to hit the mark now and then; but let him meet a grave illness, and at every turn he recklessly pronounces on a person's living or dying — then he cannot be spoken of in the same breath as one who has mastered the medical canon and studied the ancient methods. People, seeing only that he has a chance success for a moment, or is quicker than the ancients, say that the Classic of Difficulties need not be learned — is this not a great error!
The doctrine of the Laṅkāvatāra is deep and hidden, its wording spare and archaic. Those who read it cannot always even break the phrasing — how much less put aside the words to grasp the doctrine, or forget the doctrine to awaken to the original mind? This is precisely why it has been so forlorn and neglected in the world, all but abolished and barely surviving. The Grand Guardian of the Heir Apparent, Mr. Lequan, Lord Zhang Andao, with a vast mind, attained the pure awakening. In the Qingli years he had been Prefect of Chuzhou; coming to a monks' quarters, he chanced upon this scripture, and the moment it was in his hand he was struck as though recovering some old possession. Before the scroll was even read through, the karmic hindrances of many lives melted away like ice; and looking closely at the brush-strokes, they were his own hand, plainly as could be. In a mingling of grief and joy he sighed on and on, and from this entered awakening, ever using the four verses at the head of the scripture to make clear the heart's essence. I (Su Shi) have been in company at Lord Zhang's gate now for thirty years; this year, in the second month, passing through the Southern Capital, I saw him at his private residence. Lord Zhang was then seventy-nine; the floating illusions all but extinguished, the light of his wisdom whole and complete; while I too was growing old amid troubles, a hundred thoughts gone cold as ashes. Lord Zhang held that I could still be taught, and so he handed this scripture to me, and moreover produced three hundred thousand cash for me to have it printed and given freely throughout the Jiang-Huai region. The elder of Jinshan, the great master Foyin, Liaoyuan, said: "A printed edition will always have a time when the printing is used up; but if it is written out and carved into blocks, it will be transmitted without end." So I wrote it out, and Liaoyuan further sent his attendant Xiaoji hurrying to Qiantang to seek out a fine carver and have the blocks cut, whereupon it was housed at Jinshan Monastery as its permanent possession.
The ninth day of the ninth month, the eighth year of the Yuanfeng era.