Pāli RootsGiving in the ĀgamasThe Field of Merit in the VinayaFrom Giving to PāramitāThe Three Wheels EmptyThe Reverse Side of the ŚūraṅgamaThe LotusThe Huayan Dharma-RealmThe Modern Diagnosis, and a Coda
25
Part 5 · The Three Wheels Empty
Giving · 3 papers
Part Four followed the great treatises of the Mahāyāna and laid the matter of "the three wheels empty" wide open, talked it through to the bottom. That is what treatises are good a[ from the book's part intro ]
論Study the papersfootnotes · abstracts
15Diamond Sutra Giving TreatiseThis paper examines the Vajracchedikā-prajñāpāramitā (T0235, Kumārajīva's Diamond Sūtra) on the reconfiguration of dāna-pāramitā through the paradox of "non-abiding giving" (無住施) and "empty merit" (福德性空). Using CBETA XML as ground truth and systematic vault searches across prajñāpāramitā, Yogācāra, and madhyamaka corpora -- with parallel comparison against Xuanzang's Mahāprajñāpāramitā-sūtra (T0220c), Vasubandhu's Vajracchedikā-śāstra (T1511), and six Chinese translations -- I argue that T0235's "non-abiding giving" is not a negative negation of giving but the epistemic condition of giving itself. The merit paradox ("because merit is empty, the Tathāgata says great merit is gained") employs a truncated X is-not X triad (missing the third step "is named") to prevent grasping at emptiness itself. A philological finding: T0235 contains zero instances of the term "three wheels empty" (三輪體空) -- a later scholastic summary -- so the text's own vocabulary is "non-grasping at marks" (不住相). The core finding: non-abiding giving is not a utilitarian merit-accumulation strategy but the genuine expression of dharma-empty; when the giver grasps at no marks, merit shifts from limited saṃvṛti-causality to unlimited nirvāṇa-oriented causality.16The Silence of the Heart SūtraThis paper examines the Heart Sūtra's (T0251) silence on dāna-pāramitā, arguing that giving's absence is not oversight but theological statement. Using CBETA primary sources, systematic comparison across seven Chinese Heart Sūtra translations, Kuiji's Xinjing Youzan (T33n1710), and the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra (T1509), alongside the Āgama's giving-wisdom pairing tradition and the Chiliastikon's six pāramitās sequence, I argue that the Heart Sūtra's silence on dāna is not passive omission but active theological choice. Seven doctrinal Heart Sūtra translations all contain zero mentions of dāna--silence is a structural, cross-version feature. Kuiji's "總合說故" explicitly states that the Heart Sūtra's "no cognition and no attainment" comprehensively expresses all six pāramitās, so dāna's absence is subsumption not omission. The Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra formalizes the six pāramitās into two poles--"the merit group" (功德分: dāna first) and "the wisdom group" (慧明分: prajñā last)--and the Heart Sūtra presents only the wisdom pole. The metaphor "when the king arrives, his retinue follows"--prajñāpāramitā as the guiding principle of all six pāramitās means naming prajñā implicitly includes dāna. "Wealth autonomy is gained through giving"--dāna's achieved presence in the sūtra's framework of Avalokiteśva's ten autonomies. The core finding: the Heart Sūtra's silence on dāna is not passive omission but active theological choice--it provides the condition under which giving becomes pāramitā (perfection), rather than discussing dāna itself.17The Broad Canon Panorama of DānaThis paper examines the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra's (T0220, 600 chapters) discourse on dāna-pāramitā, arguing that the "broad canon" (廣本) and the Heart Sūtra's "abbreviated canon" (略本) are not contradictory but the same prajñāpāramitā principle manifesting through different adaptive contexts. Using CBETA primary sources, the analysis examines: (1) the dāna→śīla→dhyāna→prajñā gradual arc in chapter 528; (2) the "no attainment + giving" structural formula co-occurring across 196 chapters (~299 passages); (3) the density of 68 "should practice giving" commands in chapters 162–165; and (4) Fazang's (法藏) "廣略隨緣" (broad and abbreviated adapting to context) hermeneutical framework.Same part, two ways in — papers keep the scholarly apparatus; the book is continuous prose for reading. Same source.