Pāli RootsThe Vow in the ĀgamasThe Vow as PerfectionThe Four Great VowsThe Original Vows of AmitābhaSamantabhadra's Conduct-VowsThe Vow and EmptinessAttaining Bodhi
61
Part 1 · Pāli Roots
Vow · 3 papers
This book is the last volume of the Six Practice Gates. Five volumes have gone before it—recollection, giving, repentance, discipline, concentration: the mind has learned to abide,[ from the book's part intro ]
論Study the papersfootnotes · abstracts
01What Praṇidhāna Actually MeansThis is the opening chapter of the praṇidhāna (vow) volume of the Six Practice Gates, and its task is to draw the propositional boundary for the volume as a whole. Contemporary Western (and Chinese) self-help culture habitually misreads making a vow as a more devout form of goal-setting or wishing; this chapter argues instead that praṇidhāna is not a wish, not craving, and not manifestation — the difference lying not in the intensity of will but in the object the will is oriented toward, and in whether the one who vows presupposes a self to be realized. The argument proceeds by distinguishing three terms: the Ekottarāgama and the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra establish the vow as the founding of an orientation toward awakening; the Upāsaka-śīla-sūtra establishes the pledge as the decisive undertaking of what is received; the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra's chapter on sympathetic-joy transference and the Avataṃsaka-sūtra's chapter on the ten transferences establish transference as the re-direction of merit's aim rather than a hand-over; and a single line of the Saṃyuktāgama sets the boundary between vow and craving. From these the chapter argues that the vow is a constitutive rather than an acquisitive act, that transference is the turning of an aim rather than the transfer of a thing, and that the three terms, mutually entailing, each block one of three misreadings — the vow is a wish, the vow is craving, the vow is a transaction. The conclusion: the three terms together define the gate of vows' thesis that the vow is not a wish, and lay the semantic ground for the chapters that follow.02The Vow before DīpaṃkaraThis paper, the spine-establishing essay of the Praṇidhāna (Vow) volume, treats a scene the Mahāyāna tradition places at the very origin of the path to awakening: in a remote past age, an ascetic named Sumedha (also rendered Megha, 善慧/儒童), meeting the Buddha Dīpaṃkara, spreads flowers and then his own hair over the mud, vows to become a Buddha, and at once receives the Buddha's prediction. This single vow is the point of departure for Śākyamuni's entire bodhisattva path. The thesis: the vow is not a life-mission bought through sacrifice or set up to author a self's biography; it is the founding vow that entrusts the whole arc of a life to one orientation — "awakening, and for the sake of beings" — an orientation whose terminus ultimately empties the one who vows. Through the continuous biography of the Sūtra on Past and Present Causes and Effects, the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra's gloss that to vow is already to be founded as a bodhisattva, and the early vow-language of the Ekottarāgama, the paper establishes the vow as the path's point of arousal — the spine's first end — while holding three corrections of the middle way: the vow is not heroic self-sacrifice, not a merit-for-result transaction, and not the kind of self-authored life-narrative the modern self constructs in its own service.03Adhiṭṭhāna and the Resolve of the BodhisattaThis paper addresses a problem internal to the vow: once aspiration has been raised and turned toward awakening, what makes it irreversible? The common picture equates the vow's endurance with willpower—forging the mind into steel so it neither bends nor breaks across years and setbacks. This paper argues the opposite: the vow's non-retreat is not a self strengthening its will to the limit, but adhiṭṭhāna ("resolve") understood as the immovability native to the vow itself. The argument proceeds in three layers. First, an honest accounting of a textual tension: adhiṭṭhāna is the eighth of the Theravāda ten perfections, yet classical Chinese translation and the Mahāyāna list of ten perfections contain no such item—Mahāyāna places praṇidhāna ("vow") in the eighth position instead. This substitution is not a defect but the very seam of the thesis. Second, working from Chinese-language treatises, the paper establishes "resolve is the vow's non-retreat": the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra constitutes the bodhisattva from three things—great vow, an unshakable mind, unflagging effort—and the Daśabhūmika-vibhāṣā binds raising the great-minded vow to entry into "the assured company" in a single clause. Third, the paper draws boundaries: adhiṭṭhāna must not be conflated with the Yogācāra mental factor adhimokṣa ("resolved conviction"), nor reduced to modern psychology's grit. The core finding: because the awakening toward which this vow aims empties the one who vows, the vow has no self-serving terminus from which to retreat or by which to be exhausted—its non-retreat rests on the ground of no-self.Same part, two ways in — papers keep the scholarly apparatus; the book is continuous prose for reading. Same source.