Pāli RootsThe Vow in the ĀgamasThe Vow as PerfectionThe Four Great VowsThe Original Vows of AmitābhaSamantabhadra's Conduct-VowsThe Vow and EmptinessAttaining Bodhi
63
Part 3 · The Vow as Perfection
Vow · 3 papers
The first two parts saw the vow's root and the vow's fuel clearly: the vow is the arousing that turns a direction around, and the arousing itself does not retreat; the force it rel[ from the book's part intro ]
論Study the papersfootnotes · abstracts
06Praṇidhāna as the Eighth PerfectionIn the Mahāyāna scheme of ten perfections, vow (praṇidhāna) holds the eighth place. This paper asks on what grounds vow deserves to be called a "perfection" at all: it is, after all, only one mental act among the many of practice, so how can it stand beside giving, discipline, and wisdom as a way of crossing to the far shore? Drawing on the Yogācārabhūmi, the Cheng weishi lun, the Mahāyāna-saṃgraha, and the chapter on the Ten Grounds in the eighty-fascicle Avataṃsaka, the paper argues that vow earns the name not because it is one practice among others but on three counts. First, it passes the very test that makes a perfection a perfection—it is matured across three immeasurable eons, it is supremely pure in its own nature, and it secures the consummate fruit of awakening. Second, its nature embraces two vows at once, the vow to seek awakening and the vow to benefit beings, so that it is complete on both the self-benefiting and the other-benefiting faces. Third, it is a forward-leaning vow, forever drawing in what is to come and longing for the knowledge that lies further and further ahead; its standing therefore lies not in being "already completed" but in "not yet having reached the far shore." The paper holds further that pāramitā, on the Yogācāra masters' own gloss, means "crossing to the far shore" rather than "perfection" in the sense of completion; and that reading vow through "the far shore" fits it far better than reading it through "completion"—for vow is precisely the power that has not yet arrived, yet has already settled the direction of the whole road. Most telling is the scene recorded in the Avataṃsaka: when the bodhisattva of the eighth ground enters the effortless and a quietude close to nirvāṇa, the buddhas must come, by the power of his original vow, to rouse him—reminding him to "be mindful of the vow you first made." The highest showing of vow lies not in the vehemence of its first arising but in its being a power that must be continually roused, and that is not self-sufficient. The paper closes by setting two signposts—how vow becomes the very skeleton of practice across the Ten Grounds, and how the power of vow integrates merit and wisdom toward awakening—reserved for the papers that follow in this Part.07The Ten Vows of the Ten GroundsWhen a bodhisattva first reaches the first ground—the Ground of Joy (pramuditā)—the first thing done is not to take up some particular practice but to raise ten great vows. Drawing on the Avataṃsaka-sūtra's "Ten Grounds" chapter (Book 26, in the eighty-fascicle recension), this paper argues that these ten vows are not a checklist to be ticked off one practice at a time but the architectural spine of the entire path of the ten grounds: the vow stands before practice, and it steers both practice and the wisdom on which practice rests. The case is built across three commentarial layers. The sūtra itself secures the vows' governing status, declaring that "taking these ten vow-gates as chief" fulfills a hundred thousand myriad incalculable vows. Vasubandhu's commentary then places the vow first among "three excellences"—vow, practice, fruit-benefit—and shows, with the image of one vow generating myriads of vows as its retinue, that vows breed vows. Chengguan's commentary completes the frame: practice and wisdom are steered by the vow, and every great vow in the tradition is gathered under these ten. The whole argument turns on the tenth vow's "inexhaustible" close: should the realm of beings end, my vow would end—but because the realm of beings cannot be exhausted, neither can the wholesome root of this vow. That single line locks the spine into a frame built never to close: the vow can serve as the spine of a path precisely because its terminal condition is one that, by design, can never be met. The paper sets this beside contemporary action theory—planning, joint commitment, self-constitution—and finds that each models commitment as something meant to be completed, released, or unified, leaving no slot for a commitment whose constitutive form is to remain forever open. The ten vows of the ten grounds occupy exactly that empty slot.08Nāgārjuna and the Bodhisattva's Vow-PowerThis paper asks after the power of aspiration: in Nāgārjuna's Treatise on the Great Perfection of Wisdom (Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra, T1509), what does vow-power (praṇidhāna-bala) actually do? The author first voices a pragmatic farmer's objection—if sowing melons yields melons and meritorious deeds yield merit by natural recompense, why add a vow at all?—and then dismantles it: merit done without a vow "sets up no aim," so that merit, though gained, does not know what it builds; a vow is not one more deed of merit added to the heap but a direction given to the heap. One simile sets the key: "merit is like the ox, the vow like the driver"—the ox has the strength to pull the cart, but only the driver makes it arrive somewhere. On this basis the paper argues for two layers of vow-power's work. First, the vow steers rather than adds: it integrates and orients scattered merit so that it tends toward adorning a buddha-field and toward supreme awakening ("by the power of the vow one receives the surpassing fruit"). Second, and more deeply, vow-power is the force that keeps the wisdom which "sees all dharmas as actionless" and the merit-conduct which "accumulates moment by moment" from cancelling each other—letting them instead converge. Prajñā sees all dharmas as unconditioned and actionless, and so should tend toward cessation; yet the bodhisattva "does not cease, because the manifold merits are not yet complete, and by great compassion and the power of the original vow does not cease," indeed "within the actionless, by the power of effort, liberates all." Vow-power thus becomes the hinge between wisdom and great conduct: it does not increase the quantity of merit but fixes its direction; it does not negate the emptiness seen by wisdom but raises, within that emptiness, the conduct of liberating beings. The paper closes with a signpost toward the non-duality of conduct and vow, reserved for later in the volume.Same part, two ways in — papers keep the scholarly apparatus; the book is continuous prose for reading. Same source.