成唯識論 義疏通講 · 冊6
釋結施願分Concluding Interpretation and Dedication
全文五層 →Full five layers →〔所釋之頌〕第三十頌釋竟·結施願
走到這裡,三十頌已經講盡,整部論也到了收尾。這一節很短卻很要緊:論主先把『這部論為什麼叫《成唯識論》』交代清楚,再把世親本頌的名字、以及那首把功德迴向眾生的結願偈一併收結。其後附一篇唐代沈玄明所撰的〈後序〉——那不是論的義理,而是記造論的緣起、玄奘譯場的始末、以及窺基撰疏傳後的一段史筆,文采極盛,史料價值也高。下面先講論本身的收結,再逐段把後序講通。
這一分要先說清它的「所本」。流通分的結頌,不像前面釋唯識性相那樣有特定的經、論作宗依——它是造論者自陳的願文,是把所成的功德迴向眾生的一段話,並不是在解釋某一部經、某一條論的義理;所以這裡沒有別的『經所宗』可指。可以對讀的,是慈氏、無著、世親這一系造論末了多半都附的『歸功施群生』之式。《大乘莊嚴經論》在講完利他隨順之後,立了一首迴向偈,意思是:菩薩在不同的根性、不同的處所、做著不同的行業,凡是所作的一切,都迴轉過來利益眾生。這正與本論結偈「所獲功德施群生、願共速登無上覺」同一個格——造論、修行所成就的功德,不自己受用,而普施一切有情。這是唯識系造論迴向的通軌;底下講本論的結頌,便當就著這一通軌來看。
釋結施願分
一、結釋示正名——為什麼叫《成唯識論》
這部論用「三分」把「唯識」之義立起來——所謂三分,是指境、行、果,或說相、性、位這樣的三重結構;全論就是循著這三重把唯識的道理成立起來,所以才叫《成唯識論》,意思就是『成立唯識(之理)的論』。窺基《述記》在這裡有兩處點撥:一是說這「三分」之立,是要同於佛說法的『初、中、後皆善』、純一、圓滿、清白、梵行那樣的完整體式,所以判此論亦具三分;二是釋這「成」字,通著兩重意思——「以教成教」(用聖教成立聖教)和「以教成理」(用聖教成立義理),教、理兩面都通,並非單取一邊。
二、釋亦名——又叫《淨唯識論》
這部論還有另一個名字,叫《淨唯識論》。為什麼又這樣叫?因為它所顯的「唯識」之理,極為明白、極為清淨——把心外實境的種種妄執都掃乾淨了,只剩下這一分明淨的識理,所以用「淨」字來標它。窺基《述記》釋這「淨」字,是『從喻而顯』:就像真如的本性雖然本來清淨,可是若不去修習,那分清淨便無從彰顯出來;同樣地,唯識之理本自明淨,須由這部論的教、理把它顯發,「淨」之名才坐實——所以「淨」字在教、在理兩面都說得通。
三、示本論名·釋結施願——本頌叫《唯識三十》,並把功德迴向眾生
要分清兩層:上面說的是『這部釋論』的名字,而世親所造的那本「頌」另有自己的名字,叫《唯識三十(論頌)》。為什麼是「三十」?因為唯識之理,恰好用這三十頌就圓滿顯盡了——不多一頌、也不少一頌,三十之數正好把這道理收圓,所以以「三十」為名。窺基《述記》在這一句「由三十頌顯唯識理、乃得圓滿、非增減」上補了一筆:這「非增非減」之義,可以依著相、性、位三重來分別配釋——無論就哪一重去配,都見得三十之數恰恰圓滿,沒有可增、沒有可減。
頌的末尾,世親附了一首結願偈,把全論作個迴向。窺基《述記》判這四句偈的結構是:前兩句「已依聖教及正理、分別唯識性相義」是「結牒上文」——把全論所造的本懷收束牒起;後兩句「所獲功德施群生、願共速登無上覺」是「正迴施發願」——正式把功德迴施、發起共登覺果的願。順著這個分判來看:以上所講,都是依著佛的聖教、又依著正當的道理,去分別辨明「唯識」的「性」與「相」這兩重義理的;如今造論所得的這一切功德,並不自留,而是全數施與一切眾生,但願自己與眾生一同,迅速登上「無上覺」——也就是無上正等菩提、究竟的佛果。論主不把善根攬在自身,這一念迴向,正是大乘造論的本懷。
〔後序〕——唐·沈玄明撰
接下來是唐代沈玄明所撰〈後序〉。全文用駢儷文記述本論成書、玄奘糅譯的始末與譯場人物,非論本義理;以下依篇章次第逐段疏解。
一、覺海與一音——佛法的氣象
文章一開頭,用一連串恢宏的比喻來形容佛的覺境。覺悟的大海澄澈而幽深,它涵納了萬條支流,一直通向最究竟的宗極之理;佛那神妙的心幾闡發著最幽微之處,覆被萬象而凝成「至真」。這覺智像高懸的慧日,照亮了六道的幽暗(六幽);又像佈散的慈雲,清涼了八方(八㝢)。佛以「一音」說法,眾生卻能隨各自的根器各得理解(懸解);佛法超出了聲聞、緣覺、菩薩這三乘的拘限,向著大道疾馳遠行。
二、半器與滿機——一代教法的開展
接著回顧佛一生說法的開合。世尊體察憍陳如那一輩人的根器還只是「半器」(小乘的器量),便先在鹿野苑為他們津渡「說有」的教法,講四聖諦這些「有」的道理;待時節到了,又照鑒須菩提(善現)那圓滿的根機,在靈鷲山演繹「空空」的般若。然而佛雖已遠離「常、見」與「斷、滅」這兩種偏邊,又何嘗真的把「有」與「空」的方便言教(筌蹄)整個丟開?——最終要顯的,是那無上靈妙的宗極,而把「中道」凝定在這部唯識的教法裡。這一句,正把唯識安立為非空非有的中道之教。
三、滅後法亂——外道與部執的紛紜
再寫佛滅之後的局面。佛在金河(拘尸那)入滅、斂去了光景,那淳正的法源就此派分四散,再難追回;後世的經典像紛紛飄落的花瓣一樣散逸,澆薄之風你接著我地競相煽動。於是『二十八種外道見』在五印度間迷亂橫行,就像桑間的雁群失了方向;「十六師」那些外道宗主,在四方人主的疆域裡彼此攪擾,就像雲裡的牛難以分辨。法海一時濁亂——這正是世親出世、唯識立教的背景。
四、世親出世——歸根之作《唯識三十偈》
亂世將近五百年,聖者方才出世,這位聖者就是世親,實在是賢劫中應世而生的真人。他把那份天縱的智慧隱藏起來、用來提攜化導眾生,一生飛光毓彩、照映群靈。他先把常明的智光發揮在《發智》的「八蘊」上、又在「六足」諸論上藻飾初發的義解,在《俱舍》裡秀發談辯、標舉說一切有部的餘宗;其後又把幽深的法波攝歸大乘,文飾那「研空」的至理,使化道步步升高、照徹到極處,最終湛然凝定於這三十頌。——所以說,《唯識三十偈》是世親晚年「歸根」、歸宗大乘的遺製。
五、本頌幽深而未廣釋——世親但造頌而隱
這一段嘆世親本頌的深與簡。它的義理深藏得像淵海,把唯識的境相泛現在光華之河上;它的義味鬱盛如雲氣,又華麗如玄圃仙苑上的虹彩文章。一句話能含攝萬象,一個字能包納千種訓解,妙旨天然超逸、辭采深邃如星華。然而這樣幽微的義緒,世親還來不及廣為宣布,那冥奧的神思就絕於凡境之外,孤明斂藏、祕思潛沉——意思是說:世親只造了這本根本頌,還來不及作詳盡的解釋就隱去了。這正為下文『十大菩薩各作釋論』埋下伏筆。
六、十大菩薩各作釋——《成唯識論》之名的由來
世親之後,有護法、安慧等「十大菩薩」(也就是十大論師)出來。他們把幽深的法寶(玄珠)藏蘊於教藏(八藏)之中,在四方聳起層層的義學樓構。他們宅心照察「二因」、棲神安住於清淨的「三觀」,智慧升暉如登「十地」,以澄澈的智水滋潤賢者之林;又鄰近「七覺支」的微妙之幾,以皎潔的行月照破重重長夜。他們從容而又芳烈,景仰並蹈循前賢的軌跡;其言如箭涌如泉湧,其思如風飛如寶散——這十位都各自觀著世親的本頌,各自裁定、各作了一部解釋。後來玄奘把這十家的釋論糅合成一部,就名為《成唯識論》,也叫《淨唯識論》。論名的根由,就在這裡。
七、唯識中道的功用——空二取、立一心
這一段點出這部論的宗旨功用。它把心外的「二取」(能取的見分妄計與所取的相分妄計)空掉,止息那些執著心外實有(滯有)的迷途;同時又安立識內的「一心」,遣除那種把一切都撥成空無(惡取空、歸空)的妄執。若昧於這「心、境」之理,眾生就在苦海裡長久沉淪;若悟得這「非空非有」的旨趣,便能在覺岸上高高立足。於是『九十五種外道』亂了的風塵車轍被掃平、邪見的星旗也倒伏,『十八部小乘』那些只到羊車(羬軒)的便停了下來、轉而扶上大乘的龍轂。這部論窮究神妙、探到最深之處與最關鍵之機,貫通「十支」之論、洞徹「九分」之教,旁參《周易》「十翼」如搏仙羽、俯觀諸子「九流」以深濬瓊波,把幽邃的至理盡數抉發、把佛這位法王的奧典闡明。到此地步,連名相與言象都一併泯忘——把玄妙的光景顯耀於西天竺、又把這虹光珍藏傳入中國(震旦),濟度眾生、弘揚大道,最終默然歸於這宗門之德。
八、玄奘西行求法——取經與東歸
下面轉寫玄奘。這位大和尚、三藏法師玄奘,體性睿哲、捨離了對「真」的妄執,履仁而又翔慧;他在『九門禪定』中證得寂靜如融山,『八萬法門』如玄津在他胸中如海騰流。他的智德像疊起的金牆而如明月朗耀,像高峻的玉宇而如雲霞飛舉,那芳粹勝過澄蘭、那風華孕於龍翼。他痛惜微言的光彩被埋沒、嗟嘆大義的光暉淪喪,於是發下誓願、毅然踏上這趟遙遠的求法之行:泳渡祥河、攀折寶樹的低枝、循著雕鏤的橋樑神遊、踏著雪峯安步而行,登上紫階而證道、俯瞰玄影以莊嚴自己的修因。他在印度採擷奧義、遍觀奇珍,前後經歷約二十四年(二紀);最後緘封檀香、篆寫貝葉經本,馱著經典如白馬東歸長安(三秦)。
九、大唐譯場——詔令翻譯與譯場人事
再寫玄奘東歸後的大唐譯場盛況。我大唐的祥瑞表現於『金輪聖王』之德、禎祥資藉於帝王的天威,奄有大千而光被天下、駕御「六辯」而如天飛,神化潛通、九方仙獻寶,玄妙的法猷四方闡揚、百靈各各聳然盡職;皇帝垂拱而治,杳然在夜暉中通夢;又鋪展文華、煥然以文章來幽贊佛法。於是降下詔令(綸旨),普令翻譯:敕命尚書左僕射燕國公于志寧、中書令高陽公許敬宗等人負責「潤色」文辭,沙門釋神泰等人負責「證義」(勘定義理),沙門釋靖邁等人負責「質文」(校理文質)。這翻譯事業,從貞觀十九年(六四五)開始,一直到顯慶末年,譯出的部數將近六十、卷數出到一千。其盛況超過蓬萊、浩瀚如環海,使法寶大為昌隆、廣啟群迷;連頌德文與序經文都蒙皇帝親自製作(宸藻),這樣玄風之盛,前所未聞。
十、糅十釋為一部——《成唯識論》的成書
這一段專記《成唯識論》本身的糅譯。就在顯慶四年(六五九,歲次己未),時值冬令、閏在陽月,玄奘把「十釋」——也就是十大論師的十部釋論,共四千五百頌——彙聚起來,各遵其本而分別取捨,合成一部、勒定為十卷。到那年歲末,整理銓綜方才完畢。他精審詁訓、研詳梵漢(夷夏)的對應,文調驚動於韶律、辭采揮灑於天庭,如白鳳甄選奇珍、如紫微呈現祥瑞——終於使這十家『文同而義異』的釋論,糅合得宛如出自一位大師之手。這正說明:古聖(世親與十大論師)與今賢(玄奘),他們的理趣其實是一致的。
十一、窺基撰疏傳後——後記之終
最後寫玄奘的弟子窺基。三藏玄奘的弟子窺基,出身鼎族高門、玉田華胄那樣的名門世家,壯年就潛心於道、少年便已參究玄理,學業之峻比得上道安、慧遠,識見之清如同雲鏡,閑雅的儀容如玉之瑩潔,超越道之幽邃而自澄明;逸發的韻致如蘭之芳,他的飛辯掩過了竺法汰。他理出仙音於『八種梵音』,如舞動的霄鶴翔集祥禎;他鋪布麗範於「九章」之文,如桐上的鸞影絢爛生藻。在譯侶之中他光采昇起,謙俯於僧叡而與之融暉;在義學之徒中他登上彩席,回顧慧猷而高瞻遠視。他秀如初晨的美玉之光,照徹玄學與儒學;他矯健如『彌天釋道安』那樣的絕世文翰,超騰於真、俗二諦之上。他親承玄奘的「四無礙辯」、得到「三明」之獎掖,為後學疏通門徑、引渡津要,以才華資其素養、以通理寄其神思,綜理《成唯識論》的綱領、甄定它的品第,並且兼撰一部《義疏》(也就是《成唯識論述記》)以傳給後學。他但願這教法能盤據中土、跨越並合美於河圖洛書(龜疇),祥光浮於紫宮、輝映勝過古文(麟籀)。沈玄明於是說:自己就用盡這些淺陋之辭,把這部論造、譯、傳的宗旨原委,記述如上。——後序至此而終,全論也就收尾了。
承衍
這一分是全論的結頌——結釋論名、歸功迴向,不再立新的法相義理,所以在唯識系的次第裡,它的『承用』也別有其相。
在《百法明門論》那邊,結頌歸功迴向之文並不是百法明門所攝的法相,沒有正面對得上的一條,這裡從闕。
在《唯識三十論頌》那邊,本頌寫到第三十頌(究竟位、「大牟尼名法」)就盡了;本論這首結施願偈,乃是糅釋之論在頌文之末所附的歸功迴向,正與三十頌逐章相承——頌盡而論結,於此首尾相接。
在《二十唯識論》那邊,那部論末了是破外人的實境之執而收,並沒有『結頌歸功、迴施群生』的對應之文,這裡從闕。
在《辯中邊論》那邊,卻有一個最直接的對位:它在〈辯無上乘品〉的末了,同樣附了一首造論歸功偈,意思是把辯說這部論所成就的種種功德,全數普施一切眾生,願他們獲得殊勝的生處、增長福德與智慧,迅速證得廣大的菩提。這正與本論「所獲功德施群生、願共速登無上覺」是同一個格——造論到末了,以所成的功德普施群生、發願共證菩提。這是唯識系造論迴向最切近的對讀。
在《攝大乘論》那邊,論本是終於「彼果智」、「究竟住」的辯說,並沒有在造論之末另立歸功迴向的結頌,所以在這一式上也沒有對位,這裡從闕。
We have arrived. The thirty verses have all been expounded, and the treatise as a whole now draws to its close. This final section is short but weighty. The author of the treatise first makes clear why this work bears the title Cheng Weishi Lun — "The Treatise that Establishes consciousness-only"; then he gathers up, in one motion, the title of Vasubandhu's root verses themselves, together with the closing verse of aspiration that dedicates the whole work's merit to all beings. After this comes an Afterword written by the Tang-dynasty author Shen Xuanming. That afterword is not doctrine; it is a record of how the treatise came to be made, of the full course of Xuanzang's translation bureau, and of how Kuiji composed his commentary and handed the teaching on to later generations. It is a historian's pen at full literary flourish, and its value as a source document is high. Below we first treat the treatise's own closing, and then work through the Afterword section by section until its sense is plain.
This part must first have its "basis" made clear. The concluding verse of the dissemination section is unlike the earlier exposition of the nature and characteristics of consciousness-only, which had particular scriptures and treatises as its basis. It is rather the composer's own statement of aspiration — a passage that turns the accomplished merit over to all beings — and not an explanation of the doctrine of any one scripture or any one line of treatise; so there is no separate "scripture taken as basis" to point to here. What can be read alongside it is the formula of "dedicating the merit to the multitude of beings" that the lineage of Maitreya, Asaṅga, and Vasubandhu mostly appends at the close of composing a treatise. The Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra, after expounding the conformity that benefits others, sets up a verse of turning-over whose sense is this: that whatever the bodhisattva does — in differing capacities, in differing places, engaged in differing kinds of work — all that he does, he turns back to benefit sentient beings. This is exactly the same form as this treatise's closing verse, "the merit gained I give to the multitude of beings; may we together swiftly mount to supreme awakening" — the merit accomplished in composing a treatise and in cultivating the path is not enjoyed for oneself, but bestowed universally upon all sentient beings. This is the common rule of dedication for one who composes a treatise in the consciousness-only lineage; and the treatise's own closing verse, treated below, should be read in light of this common rule.
C. The Concluding, Dedicatory, and Aspirational Part
One. Explaining the conclusion and showing the proper title — why it is called the Cheng Weishi Lun
This treatise uses a "threefold" framework to set up the meaning of "consciousness-only." By the threefold is meant object, practice, and fruit — or, put another way, the three-tiered structure of characteristic (the appearance of things), nature (their underlying reality), and stage (the levels of the path). The whole treatise follows out these three tiers and, in doing so, establishes the truth of consciousness-only. That is exactly why it is called the Cheng Weishi Lun: it means "the treatise that establishes the truth of consciousness-only." Kuiji's Notes (the Shuji) makes two points here. The first concerns the setting-up of this "threefold": it is meant to match the complete form of the Buddha's preaching of the dharma — "good in the beginning, the middle, and the end, unalloyed, fulfilled, pure, the holy life" — and so this treatise too is judged to possess its three parts. The second explains the word "establish": it runs through two senses at once — "establishing the teaching by the teaching" (using the holy teaching to establish the holy teaching) and "establishing the principle by the teaching" (using the holy teaching to establish the meaning) — both sides, teaching and principle, hold good, and it is not that only one is taken.
Two. Explaining the alternate title — it is also called the Treatise that Purifies Consciousness-Only
This treatise has another name as well: the Treatise that Purifies consciousness-only. Why is it also called this? Because the truth of "consciousness-only" that it reveals is utterly clear and utterly pure — it sweeps away every deluded clinging to real objects standing outside the mind, leaving only this one clear and pure principle of consciousness. It is for this that the word "pure" is set as its marker. Kuiji's Notes explains this word "pure" as "shown by way of a simile": just as the nature of suchness, though pure of itself from the very first, has no way of manifesting that purity unless one cultivates it — so too the principle of consciousness-only is of itself clear and pure, yet it must be drawn forth and displayed by this treatise's teaching and principle before the name "pure" is borne out. Hence the word "pure" holds good on both sides, in the teaching and in the principle.
Three. Showing the title of the root verses, with the dedication and aspiration — the root verses are called the Thirty Verses on Consciousness-Only, and the merit is turned over to all beings
Two layers must be kept distinct. What was said above is the title of this commentarial treatise. But the verses that Vasubandhu composed have a title of their own: they are called the Thirty Verses on consciousness-only. Why "thirty"? Because the truth of consciousness-only is brought to its full and complete display in exactly these thirty verses — not one verse too many, not one verse too few. The number thirty rounds the principle out precisely, and so "thirty" is taken as its name. On this very line — "by the thirty verses the truth of consciousness-only is brought to its full and complete display, neither added to nor subtracted from" — Kuiji's Notes adds a remark: this sense of "neither added to nor subtracted from" can be assigned, tier by tier, to the threefold of characteristic, nature, and stage — and however one assigns it, against whichever tier, the number thirty is seen to be exactly complete, with nothing that could be added and nothing that could be removed.
At the close of the verses, Vasubandhu appended a single verse of aspiration that turns the whole work over as a dedication. Kuiji's Notes judges the structure of these four lines thus: the first two lines — "having relied on the holy teaching and on right reasoning, I have distinguished the meaning of the nature and characteristic of consciousness-only" — are the "gathering-up and citing of the text above," drawing together and citing the original intent of all that the treatise has composed; while the latter two lines — "the merit gained I give to the multitude of beings; may we together swiftly mount to supreme awakening" — are the "formal dedication and arising of the aspiration," the formal turning-over of the merit and the rousing of the aspiration to mount together to the fruit of awakening. Following out this division: everything expounded above has been carried out by relying on the Buddha's holy teaching and by relying on right reasoning, in order to distinguish and clarify the two tiers of meaning in "consciousness-only" — its nature and its characteristic. And now, all the merit gained in composing this treatise is not kept for oneself; it is given over, in full, to all sentient beings, with the wish that oneself and all beings together may swiftly mount to "supreme awakening" — that is, to unsurpassed, perfect, complete enlightenment, the ultimate fruit of buddhahood. The author does not gather the roots of goodness to himself. This single thought of dedication is precisely the original heart of one who composes a treatise in the Great Vehicle.
[Afterword] — composed by Shen Xuanming of the Tang dynasty
What follows is the Afterword by Shen Xuanming of the Tang dynasty. Written in parallel prose, it records the treatise's composition, Xuanzang's compilation and translation, and the personnel of the translation bureau rather than expounding the treatise's doctrine. The exposition below follows its sequence section by section.
One. The ocean of awakening and the single voice — the grandeur of the Buddha-dharma
The piece opens with a series of vast images describing the Buddha's awakened realm. The great ocean of awakening is clear and deep; it draws in ten thousand tributary streams and runs all the way to the most ultimate principle of all. The Buddha's marvelous mind unfolds the most subtle and hidden of things, covers the ten thousand appearances of the world, and condenses them into "the utterly true." This awakened wisdom is like a sun of insight hung on high, lighting up the darkness of the six destinies; and like a spread of compassionate cloud, cooling the eight directions. The Buddha teaches with a "single voice," yet sentient beings, each according to their own capacity, are each able to reach understanding in their own way. The Buddha-dharma surpasses the confines of the three vehicles — those of the hearers, the solitary realizers, and the bodhisattvas — and races swiftly and far toward the great Way.
Two. The half-vessel and the ripe capacity — the unfolding of a lifetime of teaching
The afterword then looks back over the opening and closing of the Buddha's lifetime of teaching. The World-honored One, discerning that the capacity of Kauṇḍinya and his company was still only a "half-vessel" — the limited measure of the Lesser Vehicle — first ferried them across at the Deer Park with the teaching that "speaks of existence," expounding the Four Noble Truths and the other principles of what "exists." Then, when the time was ripe, he looked upon the full and ripe capacity of Subhūti and, on Vulture Peak, set forth the perfection of wisdom that "empties even emptiness." Yet though the Buddha had already left far behind the two biased extremes — the extreme of permanence-and-view and the extreme of annihilation-and-extinction — when did he ever truly throw away, in their entirety, the skillful verbal teachings of "existence" and "emptiness," the fish-trap and the snare that catch the meaning and are then set down? What he meant in the end to reveal was that unsurpassed, marvelous ultimate principle, and to fix the "middle way" firmly within this teaching of consciousness-only. This single clause is exactly what installs consciousness-only as the teaching of the middle way that is neither emptiness nor existence.
Three. The disorder of the dharma after the Buddha's passing — the tangle of heterodox schools and partisan doctrines
The afterword next describes the situation after the Buddha's passing. When the Buddha entered final extinction by the Golden River, at Kuśinagara, and gathered in his light and radiance, the pure source of the dharma split and scattered in four directions and could no longer be drawn back. The scriptures of later ages drifted apart like petals falling in confusion, and a thinning, corrupting wind was fanned up by one party after another. And so the "twenty-eight kinds of heterodox views" ran wild in disorder across the Five Indias, like a flock of geese over the mulberry fields that had lost their bearings; and the "sixteen masters," those heads of heterodox schools, stirred one another up within the realms of the rulers of the four quarters, like cattle in the clouds that cannot be told apart. The ocean of dharma was for a time turbid and disordered — and this is precisely the background against which Vasubandhu appeared in the world and consciousness-only was established as a teaching.
Four. Vasubandhu appears in the world — the work of returning to the root, the Thirty Verses on Consciousness-Only
When the disordered age had run nearly five hundred years, a sage at last appeared in the world, and this sage was Vasubandhu — truly a genuine man born in response to the needs of this fortunate eon. He concealed his heaven-sent wisdom and used it to uphold and guide sentient beings; throughout his life his radiance flew forth in brilliant colors, illuminating the host of beings. He first set the lamp of his ever-bright wisdom to work upon the "eight aggregates" of the Jñānaprasthāna, and embellished the first unfolding of his understanding upon the "six-footed" treatises of the Abhidharma; in the Abhidharmakośa he came forth brilliantly in debate, raising up the remaining tenets of the Sarvāstivāda. Afterward he drew the deep waves of the dharma back into the Great Vehicle, gave literary form to the ultimate principle of "investigating emptiness," and made the work of guidance rise step by step until it shone through to the utmost — and at last it came to rest, serenely settled, in these thirty verses. This is why we say: the Thirty Verses on consciousness-only is the late-life work in which Vasubandhu "returned to the root," returning home to the Great Vehicle.
Five. The root verses are deep yet were never given a full commentary — Vasubandhu composed the verses and then withdrew
This passage sighs over the depth and the brevity of Vasubandhu's root verses. Their meaning lies hidden deep as an abyssal sea, floating the objects and appearances of consciousness-only upon a river of radiance; their flavor is rich and dense as cloud-vapor, and ornate as the rainbow-patterned writings above the immortals' gardens of the mysterious mounts. A single line can embrace ten thousand appearances; a single word can hold a thousand kinds of interpretation; the marvelous import is by nature transcendent, and the diction is deep as the splendor of the stars. And yet this subtle thread of meaning Vasubandhu had no time to proclaim at length: that abstruse and profound mind was cut off beyond the bounds of the ordinary world; his solitary brilliance was withdrawn and gathered in, his secret thought sank from sight. The meaning is this: Vasubandhu composed only this fundamental set of verses, and withdrew before he could compose any detailed explanation of it. This is precisely what lays the ground for what follows — "the ten great bodhisattvas each composed a commentary."
Six. The ten great bodhisattvas each compose a commentary — the origin of the title Cheng Weishi Lun
After Vasubandhu came the "ten great bodhisattvas" — that is, the ten great commentator-masters — among them Dharmapāla and Sthiramati. They stored the deep treasure of the dharma, the dark pearl, within the storehouse of the teaching, and raised up, in the four quarters, tier upon tier of edifices of doctrinal learning. They settled their minds upon discerning the "two causes" and lodged their spirits in repose within the pure "three contemplations"; their wisdom climbed and shone as one ascends the "ten grounds," and with clear waters of wisdom they nourished the grove of the worthy; they drew near to the subtle workings of the "seven factors of awakening," and with the bright moon of their practice broke through layer upon layer of long night. Unhurried and yet ardent, they looked up to and walked in the tracks of the worthies before them; their words welled up like arrows, like springs, and their thought flew like the wind, scattered like jewels. These ten each contemplated Vasubandhu's root verses, each made their own determinations, and each composed a commentary. Later, Xuanzang blended the commentaries of these ten houses into a single work, and named it the Cheng Weishi Lun — also called the Treatise that Purifies consciousness-only. The very root of the treatise's title lies here.
Seven. The function of the consciousness-only middle way — emptying the two graspings, establishing the one mind
This passage points out the essential function and purport of this treatise. It empties the "two graspings" that lie outside the mind — the deluded reckoning of a grasping subject in the seeing-portion and the deluded reckoning of a grasped object in the appearance-portion — and so brings to rest those who have lost their way by clinging to real existence outside the mind, those mired in existence. At the same time it establishes the "one mind" within consciousness, and so dispels the deluded clinging that strikes everything down into sheer nothingness — the wrongly grasped emptiness, the falling into nihilism. If one is blind to this principle of "mind and object," then beings sink and drift long in the sea of suffering; but if one awakens to this purport of "neither emptiness nor existence," then one can stand high upon the far shore of awakening. And so the disordered dust and wheel-ruts of the "ninety-five kinds of heterodox paths" are swept flat and the star-banners of wrong views are toppled; the "eighteen schools of the Lesser Vehicle," which had carried beings only as far as the sheep-cart, come to a halt, and turn instead to be lifted onto the dragon-hub of the Great Vehicle. This treatise probes the marvelous to its very depths and to its most crucial pivots; it threads together the "ten branches" of the treatises and penetrates the "nine divisions" of the teaching, glancing aside at the "Ten Wings" of the Book of Changes as if soaring on immortal plumage, and looking down upon the "nine streams" of the various philosophers as if dredging deep the jade waves — drawing out in full the abstruse ultimate principle, and bringing to light the profound canon of the Buddha, that king of the dharma. Reaching this height, even names and verbal images are alike forgotten — displaying its marvelous radiance in western India, and storing this rainbow-light to be transmitted into China, ferrying beings across and spreading the great Way, until at last it returns in silence to the virtue of this school.
Eight. Xuanzang's journey west in search of the dharma — fetching the scriptures and returning east
The afterword now turns to Xuanzang. This great monk, the Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang, was by nature wise and penetrating, and had let go of the deluded clinging even to "the true"; he walked in benevolence and soared in wisdom. In the "nine gateways of meditative absorption" he realized a stillness like a mountain at rest, and the "eighty thousand gateways of the dharma" surged within his breast like a dark ford brimming into an ocean. His wisdom and virtue were like a wall of gold rising in tiers and shining like the bright moon, like a tall jade hall with the clouds and rosy mists flying up; his fragrant purity surpassed the clear orchid, and his grace and brilliance were nurtured as on the wings of dragons. He grieved that the radiance of the subtle words had been buried, and lamented that the splendor of the great meaning had been lost; and so he made a vow and resolutely set out upon that distant journey in search of the dharma: swimming across the auspicious river, plucking the low branches of the jewel-trees, roaming in spirit along carved and ornamented bridges, walking calmly over the snow-peaks, climbing the purple steps to realize the Way, and looking down upon the dark reflections to adorn the cause of his own cultivation. In India he gathered the deep meaning and surveyed its rare treasures, all told for some twenty-four years; and at the last he sealed up the sandalwood, inscribed the palm-leaf scriptures, and, like the white horse bearing the canon, returned east to Chang'an, to the land of the Three Qin.
Nine. The translation bureau of the great Tang — the imperial decree to translate, and the personnel of the bureau
The afterword next describes the flourishing of the great Tang translation bureau after Xuanzang's return east. The auspicious fortune of our great Tang was manifest in the virtue of the "golden-wheel-turning sage king," and its blessings drew upon the heavenly majesty of the sovereign; it held the great thousand-fold world and its light covered all under heaven; it rode the "six eloquences" as though flying through the heavens; its divine transformation ran secretly through all, and the immortals of the nine quarters offered up their treasures; the marvelous plan of the dharma was set forth in the four directions, and the hundred spirits each rose up in awe to do their offices. The emperor governed with folded hands and ruled in stillness, communing with dreams in the dim glow of night; and he spread out his literary brilliance, illustrious in using fine writing to give hidden support to the Buddha-dharma. And so an imperial decree was handed down, ordering a general translation: it was commanded that the Vice Director of the Department of State Affairs, the Duke of Yan, Yu Zhining, and the Director of the Secretariat, the Duke of Gaoyang, Xu Jingzong, and others should be in charge of "polishing" the diction; that the monk Shen Tai and others should be in charge of "verifying the meaning," fixing the doctrine; and that the monk Jing Mai and others should be in charge of "examining the text," collating substance and style. This enterprise of translation began in the nineteenth year of the Zhenguan era and continued to the close of the Xianqing era; the number of works rendered came to nearly sixty, and the number of fascicles ran to a thousand. Its splendor surpassed the isles of Penglai and was vast as the encircling sea, making the treasure of the dharma flourish greatly and opening the way wide for the multitude of the lost; and even the writings praising its virtue and prefacing the scriptures were composed by the emperor's own hand, his imperial brush. Such a flourishing of the mysterious teaching had never been heard of before.
Ten. Blending the ten commentaries into one work — the making of the Cheng Weishi Lun
This passage records, specifically, the blended translation of the Cheng Weishi Lun itself. In the fourth year of the Xianqing era, the year jiwei, in the season of winter, with the intercalary month falling in the bright month, Xuanzang gathered together the "ten commentaries" — the ten works of the ten great commentator-masters, four thousand five hundred verses in all — and, following each of their originals and making his selections among them, combined them into a single work, fixed in ten fascicles. By the year's end the ordering and synthesizing were at last completed. He examined the glosses with precision and studied closely the correspondences between Sanskrit and Chinese, between the foreign and the native; his literary cadence startled the very modes of music and his diction flowed forth as in the courts of heaven, like a white phoenix selecting rare treasures, like the pole-star presenting auspicious signs — until at last these ten houses, "alike in words but differing in meaning," were blended together as though they had come from the hand of a single master. This is precisely what shows that the ancient sages — Vasubandhu and the ten great masters — and the present worthy — Xuanzang — were, in their guiding purport, in fact of one accord.
Eleven. Kuiji composes the commentary and hands it on — the end of the afterword
Finally the afterword writes of Xuanzang's disciple Kuiji. Kuiji, the disciple of the Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang, came from an illustrious clan of high station, a distinguished house of jade fields and flowering lineage; in the prime of life he gave his heart to the Way, and as a youth he was already inquiring into the deep principles. The loftiness of his learning matched that of Dao'an and Huiyuan, and the clarity of his insight was like a mirror of cloud; his easeful bearing was pure as the gleam of jade, surpassing the depth of the Way and self-luminous in its clarity; the soaring grace of his rhythm was fragrant as the orchid, and his flying eloquence outshone that of Zhu Fatai. He drew out a heavenly music in the "eight kinds of pure Sanskrit sound," like dancing cranes of the empyrean gathering in auspicious throngs; he spread out a beautiful pattern in the writing of the "nine sections," like the shadows of phoenixes on the paulownia, brilliant and richly wrought. Among his fellow translators his luster rose, and he bowed humbly toward Sengrui and blended his radiance with his; among the company of doctrinal scholars he ascended to the painted seat, and looking back to the wise plans of the past he gazed far ahead. He shone as the light of fine jade in the first of morning, illumining both the mysterious learning and the Confucian; he was vigorous as that peerless literary brush of "Dao'an who covers the heavens," soaring above the two truths, the ultimate and the conventional. He directly received Xuanzang's "four kinds of unobstructed eloquence" and was favored with the "three clear knowledges"; for those who came after, he cleared the gateways and ferried them across the crucial fords, with his talent supporting his cultivation and his penetration of principle lodging his spirit. He organized the framework of the Cheng Weishi Lun, fixed its order and divisions, and in addition composed a Commentary — that is, the Notes on the Cheng Weishi Lun — to hand on to later learners. He wished that this teaching might take firm hold of the central land, surpass and harmonize with the River Chart and Luo Writing, that its auspicious light might float above the purple palace and shine more brightly than the ancient writings. And so Shen Xuanming said: with these few poor words he had exhausted his powers in recording, as above, the whole origin and purport of how this treatise was composed, translated, and handed on. With this the afterword reaches its end, and the whole treatise is brought to its close.
Onward Transmission
This part is the concluding verse of the whole treatise — it explains the title of the treatise and dedicates the merit in turning-over; it sets up no new doctrinal characteristics. And so, within the sequence of the consciousness-only lineage, its "onward use" too takes on a distinct character.
In the Hundred Dharmas treatise, the words of the concluding verse, dedicating and turning over the merit, are not among the dharma-characteristics that the gateway of the hundred dharmas embraces; there is no single item that answers to it head-on, and so here it is left aside.
In the Thirty Verses on consciousness-only, the root verses run out at the thirtieth verse (the ultimate stage, "named the dharma of the great Sage"); and this treatise's closing verse of dedication and aspiration is the turning-over of merit that the blended commentary appends at the very end of the verse-text — answering, chapter by chapter, to the Thirty Verses: the verses run out and the treatise concludes, and here head and tail meet.
In the Twenty Verses on consciousness-only, that treatise closes by refuting the outsiders' clinging to real external objects, and has no text corresponding to "a concluding verse that dedicates and turns the merit over to the multitude of beings"; so here it is left aside.
In the Madhyānta-vibhāga, however, there is the most direct correspondence: at the close of its chapter on the unsurpassed vehicle, it likewise appends a verse dedicating the merit of composing the treatise, whose sense is to bestow universally upon all sentient beings the whole of the merit accomplished in expounding this treatise, wishing that they may gain superior places of birth, increase in merit and wisdom, and swiftly realize the vast awakening. This is exactly the same form as this treatise's "the merit gained I give to the multitude of beings; may we together swiftly mount to supreme awakening" — at the close of composing a treatise, the merit accomplished is bestowed universally upon the multitude of beings, with the aspiration roused to realize awakening together. This is the closest cross-reading for the dedication of one who composes a treatise in the consciousness-only lineage.
In the Mahāyāna-saṃgraha, the treatise ends in the exposition of "the wisdom that is the fruit of those" and of "the ultimate abiding," and sets up no separate concluding verse of dedication and turning-over at the close of composing the treatise; so on this point too there is no correspondence, and here it is left aside.