大乘莊嚴經論 菩提品
「成佛」到底成的是什麼?這一品,給出最精的答案。
譯經序稱本品『最為微妙』。本品依「八七六五識,次第轉得」說八識與四智的次第關係;至於是否同一識體、智性是否本具,本頌並未明判。
依本品所列:轉第八識得鏡智,轉第七識得平等智,轉第六識得觀智,轉前五識得作事智。此處如實傳述本論配對,不另以『煩惱當體即菩提』替它加判。
這四智,再收成佛三身。〔疏借喻〕為便於初讀,可借一月千江提示『一/三』關係;此喻不是本論所引,也不作三身義的證據。
以下且看本品如何次第說四智與三身。
"Becoming a buddha" — what exactly is it that becomes? This chapter gives the most refined answer.
The translation preface calls this chapter “the most subtle and wondrous.” The chapter states that the eighth, seventh, sixth, and first five consciousnesses are turned in sequence to attain the four wisdoms. The verse does not itself decide that they are one identical substance or that wisdom is innately complete.
In the chapter’s sequence, turning the eighth consciousness attains mirror wisdom; turning the seventh attains equality wisdom; turning the sixth attains observing wisdom; and turning the first five attains accomplishing wisdom. This layer reports those pairings without adding the claim that affliction itself is awakening.
These four wisdoms are then related to the Buddha’s three bodies. 〔exposition-borrowed simile〕One moon over many rivers may suggest a “one/three” relation, but this image is not cited by the treatise and is not evidence for the three bodies.
What follows shows how this chapter presents the four wisdoms and the three bodies in sequence.
〔釋〕已說菩薩成熟眾生,次說菩薩得一切種智。
【偈】
一切難已行, 一切善已集,
一切時已度, 一切障已斷。
〔釋〕此偈顯一切種智因圓滿。一切難已行者,由具足行無量百千種難行行未曾疲倦故。一切善已集者,由具足聚集諸波羅蜜自性善根故。一切時已度者,由具足經長時大劫阿僧祇故。一切障已斷者,由具足斷一切大乘障,謂諸地所有微細障故。
【偈】
成就一切種, 此即為佛身,
譬如大篋開, 眾寶無不現。
〔釋〕此偈顯一切種智果圓滿。有三義分別:一至得、二自性、三譬喻。成就一切種者,謂至得分別,從此已後成就一切種智故。此即為佛身者,謂自性分別,即說一切種智為佛身體故。譬如大篋開眾寶無不現者,謂譬喻分別,不可思議菩提分寶皆現前故。已說一切種智為佛身,次說此身無二相。
【偈】
白法為佛身, 非無亦非有,
佛為法寶因, 法則善根因。
〔釋〕白法為佛身者,轉六波羅蜜等一切善法為佛體故。非無亦非有者,此體非無。何以故?真如無別故。亦復非有。何以故?自性不成就故。是名無二相。佛為法寶因者,佛說一切法故,及以神通力故。法則善根因者,眾生為田,善根為穀,如是法寶於所化眾生田生長善根穀故。
【偈】
具法亦離法, 如藏亦如雲,
生法雨法雨, 故成如是譬。
〔釋〕此偈重顯前義。具法亦離法者,諸佛具足一切善法故、遠離一切不善法故。如藏亦如雲者,佛寶如藏,法寶如雲。問:此以何義?答:生法雨。法雨故,成如是譬。佛寶能出生法寶,與大藏相似。法寶能生長一切眾生善根,與大雲相似。已說佛身無二相,次說是無上歸依。
【偈】
諸佛常救護, 眾生三染污,
諸惑諸惡行, 及以生老死。
〔釋〕此偈略顯救護義。諸佛常救護者,由畢竟救護故。問:救護何法?答:眾生三染污,謂煩惱染污、業染污、生染污。諸惑者,即煩惱染污。諸惡行者,即業染污。及以生老死者,即生染污。問:云何救護?答:於此三種眾生,一切時救護不捨,即是畢竟義。
【偈】
諸災及惡趣, 身見亦小乘,
如是諸眾生, 一切皆救護。
〔釋〕此偈廣顯救護義。諸災者,謂盲聾瘖瘂狂亂形殘等眾生。由佛力故,盲者得視、聾者得聽、瘂者能言、狂者得正、亂者得定、形殘者得具足,如是救護。惡趣者,謂地獄等眾生,放光照觸,令得離苦不復更入,如是救護。身見者,謂著我眾生,令得人無我,解入二乘涅槃,如是救護。小乘者,謂二乘性不定眾生,方便引入大乘,如是救護。
【偈】
佛為勝歸處, 無比故無上,
如前種種畏, 無不令脫者。
〔釋〕此偈顯歸依勝。由佛無譬喻,故為無上。是故如前所說三種染污眾生,及餘災等眾生,一切皆能救護。
【偈】
諸佛善滿身, 一切世間勝,
妙法化眾生, 以度悲海故。
〔釋〕此偈顯歸依勝因。諸佛善滿身一切世間勝者,此由自利究竟,由力無畏等諸善功德自性滿故。妙法化眾生以度悲海故者,善解教化眾生方便,及度大悲海岸究竟故。
【偈】
盡於未來際, 普及一切生,
恒時利益彼, 是說歸依大。
〔釋〕此偈顯歸依大。大有三義:一者時大,窮一切眾生生死際故。二者境大,以一切眾生為境故。三者事大,恒時作利益救脫其苦令出離故。已說無上歸依,次說如來轉依相。
【偈】
二障種恒隨, 彼滅極廣斷,
白法圓滿故, 依轉二道成。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉依有離有得。二障種恒隨彼滅極廣斷者,此明所治遠離,謂煩惱障、智障二種種子,無始已來恒時隨逐,今得永滅。極者,一切地。廣者,一切種。此皆斷故。白法圓滿故依轉二道成者,此明能治成就。謂佛體與最上圓滿白法相應,爾時依轉得二道成就:一得極清淨出世智道、二得無邊所識境界智道,是名轉依。
【偈】
彼處如來住, 不動如山王,
尚悲樂滅人, 況著諸有者。
〔釋〕此偈顯示如來轉依諸轉中勝。何以故?如來轉依住無漏界處,如山王鎮地安住不動。如此轉已,見於聲聞緣覺樂寂滅人尚生憐愍,何況遠邊下賤著有苦惱眾生。
【偈】
他利及無上, 不轉及不生,
廣大與無二, 無住亦平等,
殊勝與遍授, 是說如來轉,
顯示十功德, 差別義應知。
〔釋〕此二偈顯示如來轉依有十種功德差別。何等為十?一者他義轉,謂轉依已,為利他故。二者無上轉,謂轉依已,一切法中而得自在,過二乘轉故。三者不轉轉,謂轉依已,染污諸因不能轉此依,彼依轉故。四者不生轉,謂轉依已,一切染污法畢竟不起故。五者廣大轉,謂轉依已,示現得大菩提及般涅槃故。六者無二轉,謂轉依已,生死涅槃無有二故。七者不住轉,謂轉依已,有為無為俱不住故。八者平等轉,謂轉依已,與聲聞緣覺同解脫煩惱障故。九者殊勝轉,謂轉依已,力無畏等一切佛法無與等故。十者遍授轉,謂轉依已,恒以一切乘而教授故。
【偈】
如空遍一切, 佛亦一切遍;
虛空遍諸色, 諸佛遍眾生。
〔釋〕此偈顯示佛體一切遍,與虛空相似。初二句直說,後二句釋說。譬如虛空遍一切色聚,佛體亦爾,遍一切眾生聚。若以眾生現非佛故,言佛體不遍者,是義不然,未成就故。
【偈】
譬如水器壞, 月像不現前;
如是眾生過, 佛像亦不現。
〔釋〕此偈顯示佛體雖遍而眾生不見。譬如水器破壞不見月像,如是眾生過失不見佛像,此義得成。
【偈】
譬如火聚性, 或然或滅盡;
如是諸佛化, 或出或涅槃。
〔釋〕此偈顯示諸佛教化有出有沒。譬如火性有時熾然有時滅盡,諸佛教化亦復如是,有時示現出世、有時示現涅槃。如是已說如來轉依,次說如來事業恒無功用。
【偈】
意珠及天鼓, 自然成自事;
佛化及佛說, 無思亦如是。
〔釋〕此偈顯示佛事無功用。譬如如意寶珠雖復無心,自然能作種種變現。如來亦爾,雖復無功用心,自然能起種種變化。譬如天鼓雖復無心,自然能出種種音聲。如來亦爾,雖復無功用心,自然能說種種妙法。
【偈】
依空業無間, 而業有增減;
依界事不斷, 而事有生滅。
〔釋〕此偈顯示佛事無間。譬如世間,依空所作無時斷絕。諸佛亦爾,依無漏界而作佛事亦無斷絕。譬如世間,依空所作有增有減。諸佛亦爾,依無漏界而作佛事亦有生滅。已說無功用心不捨佛事,次說無漏法界甚深。
【偈】
如前後亦爾, 及離一切障,
非淨非不淨, 佛說名為如。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界清淨相。如前後亦爾者,所謂非淨。由自性不染故,及離一切障者,所謂非不淨。由後時客塵離故,非淨非不淨佛說名為如者。是故佛說是如非淨非不淨,是名法界清淨相。
【偈】
清淨空無我, 佛說第一我;
諸佛我淨故, 故佛名大我。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界大我相。清淨空無我者,此無漏界由第一無我為自性故。佛說第一我者,第一無我謂清淨如,彼清淨如即是諸佛我自性。諸佛我淨故故佛名大我者,由佛此我最得清淨,是故號佛以為大我。由此義意,諸佛於無漏界建立第一我,是名法界大我相。
【偈】
非體非非體, 如是說佛體;
是故作是論, 定是無記法。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界無記相。非體者,人法二相不可說故。非非體者,如相實有故。如是說佛體者,由此因緣故說佛體非體非非體。是故作是論定是無記法者,無記謂死後有如來、死後無如來、死後亦有如來亦無如來、死後非有如來非無如來,如是四句不可記故,是故法界是無記相。
【偈】
譬如鐵熱息, 譬如眼瞖除,
心智息亦爾, 不說有無體。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界解脫相。譬如鐵熱息譬如眼瞖除者,如是二物熱息瞖除,可說非體非非體。何以故?非體者,由熱瞖無相故。非非體者,由息相有體故。心智息亦爾不說有無體者,諸佛心智以貪為熱、以無明為瞖,彼二若息,亦說非體非非體。何以故?非體者,由貪及無明息故。非非體者,由心慧解脫有故。是名法界解脫相。已說相甚深,次說處甚深。
【偈】
諸佛無漏界, 非一亦非多,
前身隨順故, 非身如空故。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界處甚深。諸佛無漏法界非一亦非多。何以故?非一者,由前身隨順故。非多者,由非身故。問:云何非身?答:如虛空故。是名法界處甚深。已說處甚深,次說業甚深。
【偈】
譬如大寶藏, 眾寶之所依;
淨界亦如是, 佛法之依止。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界依止業,由清淨法界為力無畏等諸菩提分寶所依止故。
【偈】
譬如密雲布, 灑雨成百穀;
淨界亦如是, 流善熟眾生。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界成熟眾生業,由從清淨法界流諸善根成熟眾生故。
【偈】
譬如日月盈, 皎淨輪圓滿;
淨界亦如是, 善淨聚圓滿。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界到究竟業。聚謂福智,由清淨法界,如此二聚得圓滿故。
【偈】
譬如日輪出, 流光照一切;
淨界亦如是, 流說化群生。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界說正法業。
【偈】
譬如日光合, 同事照世間;
淨界亦如是, 佛合同業化。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界化所作業。譬如多日多光一時和合同作一事,謂乾熟等。如是多佛多智一時和合同作一業,謂變化等。
【偈】
譬如日光照, 無限亦一時;
淨界佛光照, 二事亦如是。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界無分別業。譬如日光普照,無有分限亦復一時。如是佛光普照,無限一時亦復如是。
【偈】
譬如諸日光, 說有雲等翳;
淨界諸佛智, 說有眾生障。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界不作業。譬如日光,雲等為翳,是故不照。如是佛光,眾生過失為障,五濁多故,是故不有所作。
【偈】
譬如滋灰力, 染衣種種色;
淨界行願力, 解脫種種智。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界解脫智業。譬如別衣由滋灰力,有處得種種色、有處不得種種色。三乘淨界亦爾,由行願力,諸佛解脫得種種智、二乘解脫不得種種智。
【偈】
無漏界甚深, 相處業三種,
諸佛如是說, 譬如染畫空。
〔釋〕此偈重顯前甚深義。無漏界甚深相處業三種者,此無漏界,世尊略說三種甚深:一者相甚深、二者處甚深、三者業甚深。相甚深有四種:一清淨相、二大我相、三無記相、四解脫相,如其次第。由前四偈所顯處甚深一種,謂一多不住故。由第五偈所顯業甚深有八種:一寶依止業、二成熟眾生業、三到究竟業、四說正法業、五化所作業、六無分別業、七智不作業、八解脫智業,如其次第。由後八偈所顯,諸佛如是說,譬如染畫空者,此無漏界無有戲論,譬如虛空是故甚深。如是甚深差別說者,譬如染於虛空、畫於虛空,是義應知。
【偈】
一切無別故, 得如清淨故,
故說諸眾生, 名為如來藏。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界是如來藏。一切無別故者,一切眾生、一切諸佛等無差別,故名為如。得如清淨故者,得清淨如以為自性,故名如來。以是義故,可說一切眾生名為如來藏。已說無漏界甚深,次說諸佛變化。
【偈】
聲聞及緣覺, 菩薩與如來,
初化退世間, 至佛退菩薩。
〔釋〕此偈顯示增上變化。一切世間變化,聲聞變化能退。一切聲聞變化、緣覺變化能退。一切緣覺變化,菩薩變化能退。一切菩薩變化,諸佛變化能退。無有一人變化,能退諸佛變化,是故如來變化最得增上。
【偈】
如是佛變化, 無量不思議,
隨人隨世界, 隨時種種現。
〔釋〕此偈顯示甚深變化。此甚深有二種:一者無量、二者不思議。問:此事云何?答:隨何根人、隨何世界、隨何時節,如其差別,若多若少種種變化。如是無量亦不思議,是故如來變化最為甚深。自下次說別轉變化。
【偈】
如是五根轉, 變化得增上,
諸義遍所作, 功德千二百。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉五根變化。此變化得二種增上:一者得諸義遍所作,謂一一根皆能互用一切境界故。二者得功德千二百,謂一一根各得千二百功德故。
【偈】
如是意根轉, 變化得增上,
極淨無分別, 恒隨變化行。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉意根變化。意根,謂染污識。由此轉故,得極淨無分別智,恒與一切變化隨行共所作故。
【偈】
如是義受轉, 變化得增上,
淨土如所欲, 受用皆現前。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉義受變化。義謂五塵,受謂五識,由此二轉,剎土清淨,所欲現前隨意受用。
【偈】
如是分別轉, 變化得增上,
諸智所作業, 恒時無礙行。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉分別變化。分別謂意識,由此轉故,諸智所作一切時變化無有障礙。
【偈】
如是安立轉, 變化得增上,
住佛不動句, 不住於涅槃。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉安立變化。安立謂器世界,由此轉故,住佛不動無漏法界,得不般涅槃,恒起增上變化。
【偈】
如是欲染轉, 變化得增上,
住佛無上樂, 示現妻無染。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉欲染變化。由此轉故得二種變化:一者得無上樂住、二者得於妻無染。
【偈】
如是空想轉, 變化得增上,
隨欲一切得, 所去皆無擁。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉空想變化。由此轉故得二種變化:一者所欲皆得,得虛空藏故。二者所去無擁,得虛空解故。
【偈】
如是無量轉, 如是無量化,
不思議所作, 諸佛依無垢。
〔釋〕此偈總結前義。由無量轉故,得無量變化。如是諸佛不思議業,一切皆依無漏法界,是義應知。已說諸佛變化,次說諸佛成熟眾生。
【偈】
令集亦令長, 令熟亦令脫,
熟熟不無餘, 世間無盡故。
〔釋〕此偈顯示次第成熟因。未集善根者令聚集、已集善根者令增長、已長善根者令成熟、已熟善根者令解脫,使得最極清淨,如是十方諸佛各各善說。熟已復熟不般涅槃。何以故?由諸世間無有盡故。
【偈】
難得已具得, 處處為物歸,
希有非希有, 由得善方便。
〔釋〕此偈顯示已熟菩薩行非希有相。難得已具得處處為物歸者,無上菩提最上功德此未曾有,今已具足相應,由此相應故能恒於十方世界為物歸處。希有非希有者,如是處處成熟眾生,是為希有。如此希有亦非希有。何以故?由得善方便故。善方便者,謂隨機道即是清淨行。
【偈】
轉法及法沒, 得道亦涅槃,
處處方便起, 不動真法界。
〔釋〕此偈顯示普遍成熟因。轉法及法沒得道亦涅槃者,謂於一剎那中,有處示現轉無量法輪、有處示現正法滅盡、有處示現得大菩提、有處示現入於涅槃,此由眾生行不同故。處處方便起不動真法界者,若眾生應可成熟,如來隨彼住處處處教化,然於無漏法界亦復不動。
【偈】
不起分別意, 成熟去來今,
處處化眾生, 三門常示現。
〔釋〕此偈顯示自然成熟因。不起分別意成熟去來今者,一切諸佛不作是念:我曾成熟眾生、我當成熟眾生、我今成熟眾生。何以故?由無分別故。處處化眾生三門常示現者,雖無功用,而一切時以諸善根於十方世界遍以三門成熟眾生。三門者,謂三乘教門故。
【偈】
如日自然光, 照闇成百穀,
法日光亦爾, 滅惑熟眾生。
〔釋〕此偈譬顯自然義。譬如日輪無勤方便自然放光,處處破闇成熟百穀。諸佛亦爾,雖無功用,以法日光處處滅惑成熟眾生。
【偈】
一燈燃眾燈, 極聚明無盡;
一熟化多熟, 無盡化亦然。
〔釋〕此偈顯示展轉成熟因。譬如一燈傳然眾燈,極大燈聚無量無數,而一燈無盡。諸佛亦爾,一佛成熟,化多成熟極大眾生聚無量無數,然其化力亦復無盡。
【偈】
巨海納眾流, 無厭復無溢;
佛界攝眾善, 不滿亦不增。
〔釋〕此偈顯示無厭成熟因。譬如巨海廣納百川,無有厭足亦無盈溢,為容受故。佛界亦爾,常攝無量清淨善根,而不滿足亦不增長,由希有故。已說諸佛成熟眾生,次說諸佛法界清淨。
【偈】
二障已永除, 法如得清淨,
諸物及緣智, 自在亦無盡。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界性義。二障已永除法如得清淨者,謂清淨相,由煩惱障及智障悉永盡故。諸物及緣智自在亦無盡者,謂自在相,由於諸物及緣彼智二種自在永無盡故。
【偈】
一切種如智, 修淨法界因,
利樂化眾生, 此果亦無盡。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界因義。一切種如智修淨法界因者,謂為清淨法界,於一切時修一切種如門智以為因故。利樂化眾生此果亦無盡者,謂為教化眾生,於一切時與一切眾生利樂二果恒無盡故。
【偈】
發起身口心, 三業恒時化,
二門及二聚, 方便悉圓滿。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界業義。發起身口心三業恒時化者,謂起身業口業心業,一切時教化眾生故。二門及二聚方便悉圓滿者,謂具足二門二聚為方便故。二門,謂三昧門、陀羅尼門。二聚,謂福德聚、智慧聚。
【偈】
自性及法食, 變化位差別,
此由法界淨, 諸佛之所說。
〔釋〕此偈顯示法界位義。自性及法食變化位差別者,謂自性身、食身、化身,位差別故。此由法界淨諸佛之所說者,若法界不清淨,此位不成故。已說諸佛法界清淨,次說諸佛三身。
【偈】
性身及食身、 化身合三身,
應知第一身, 餘二之依止。
〔釋〕一切諸佛有三種身。一者自性身,由轉依相故。二者食身,由於大集眾中作法食故。三者化身,由作所化眾生利益故。此中應知,自性身為食身、化身依止,由是本故。
【偈】
食身於諸界, 受用有差別,
眾土名身業, 一切皆異故。
〔釋〕食身於一切世界中,諸徒眾、諸剎土、諸名號、諸身、諸業,如此諸受用事悉皆不同。
【偈】
平等微細身, 受用身相合,
應知受用身, 得是化身因。
〔釋〕平等,謂自性身,一切諸佛等無別故。微細者,由此身難知故。受用身,謂食身,此身與平等身合,由依起故。應知受用身復是化身因者,由所欲受用,一切示現故。
【偈】
化佛無量化, 是故名化身,
二身二利成, 一切種建立。
〔釋〕由化身諸佛於一切時化作無量差別,佛由此化故名為化身。二身者,謂食身、化身。二利者,謂自利、他利。食身以自利成就為相,化身以他利成就為相。如此二利,一切種成就故,次第建立食身及化身。
【偈】
工巧及出生, 得道般涅槃,
示此大方便, 令他得解脫。
〔釋〕復次化身者,於一切時教化眾生,或現工巧、或現出生、或現得菩提、或現般涅槃,如是種種示大方便,皆令眾生而得解脫。此是他利成就相。
【偈】
應知佛三身, 是佛身皆攝,
自他利依止, 示現悉三身。
〔釋〕應知此三身攝一切諸佛身,示現一切自利他利依止故。
【偈】
由依心業故, 三佛俱平等,
自性無間續, 三佛俱常住。
〔釋〕彼三種身,如其次第,一切諸佛悉皆平等。由依故,一切諸佛自性身平等,法界無別故。由心故,一切諸佛食身平等,佛心無別故。由業故,一切諸佛化身平等,同一所作故。復次一切諸佛悉同常住,由自性常故,一切諸佛自性身常住,畢竟無漏故。由無間常故,一切諸佛食身常住,說法無斷絕故。由相續常故,一切諸佛化身常住,雖於此滅復彼現故。已說諸佛身,次說諸佛智。
【偈】
四智鏡不動, 三智之所依,
八七六五識, 次第轉得故。
〔釋〕四智鏡不動三智之所依者,一切諸佛有四種智:一者鏡智、二者平等智、三者觀智、四者作事智。彼鏡智以不動為相,恒為餘三智之所依止。何以故?三智動故。八七六五識次第轉得故者,轉第八識得鏡智,轉第七識得平等智,轉第六識得觀智,轉前五識得作事智,是義應知。
【偈】
鏡智緣無分, 相續恒不斷,
不愚諸所識, 諸相不現前。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉第八識得鏡智。鏡智緣無分者,於一切境界不作分段緣故。相續恒不斷者,於一切時常行不斷絕故。不愚諸所識者,了知一切境界障永盡故。諸相不現前者,於諸境界離行相緣無分別故。
【偈】
鏡智諸智因, 說是大智藏,
餘身及餘智, 像現從此起。
〔釋〕此偈顯示鏡智用。鏡智諸智因說是大智藏者,彼平等智等諸智一切種皆以鏡智為因,是故此智譬如大藏,由是諸智藏故。餘身及餘智像現從此起者,餘身,謂受用身等。餘智,謂平等智等。由彼身像及彼智像,一切皆從此智出生,是故佛說此智以為鏡智。
【偈】
眾生平等智, 修淨證菩提,
不住於涅槃, 以無究竟故。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉第七識得平等智。眾生平等智修淨證菩提者,若諸菩薩證法現前時,即得一切眾生平等智。若修習此智最極清淨,即得無上菩提。不住於涅槃以無究竟故者,由眾生無盡故無究竟,無究竟故不住涅槃。由此義故,說為平等智。
【偈】
大慈與大悲, 是二恒無絕,
眾生若有信, 佛像即現前。
〔釋〕此偈顯示平等智用。大慈與大悲是二恒無絕者,諸佛如來於一切時隨逐眾生。何以故?大慈大悲無斷絕故。眾生若有信佛像即現前者,如其所信,隨彼現故。是故或有眾生見如來青色、或有眾生見如來黃色,如是一切。此前二智即是法身。
【偈】
觀智識所識, 恒時無有礙,
此智如大藏, 總持三昧依。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉第六識得觀智。觀智於所識一切境界恒無障礙,譬如大藏,與一切陀羅尼門、一切三昧門而為依止。何以故?如是二門皆從此智生故。
【偈】
恒在大眾中, 種種皆示現,
能斷諸疑網, 雨大法雨故。
〔釋〕此偈顯示觀智用,義如偈說。此觀智即是食身。
【偈】
事智於諸界, 種種化事起,
無量不思議, 為利群生故。
〔釋〕此偈顯示轉前五識得作事智。彼作事智於一切世界中作種種變化事,無量無邊不可思議。如此等業,皆為利益一切眾生故。此作事智即是化身。
【偈】
攝持及等心, 開法亦作事,
如是依四義, 次第四智起。
〔釋〕攝持者,謂聞法攝持故。等心者,謂於一切眾生得自他平等故。開法者,謂演說正法故。作事者,謂起種種化業故。依第一義,鏡智起。依第二義,平等智起。依第三義,觀智起。依第四義,作事智起。
【偈】
性別及不虛, 一切亦無始,
無別故不一, 依同故不多。
〔釋〕此偈顯示諸佛不一不多。不一者,由性別故、不虛故、一切故、無始故、無別故。性別者,由無邊諸佛性別。若言唯有一佛,而有當得菩提者,是義不然,故佛不一。不虛者,若福智聚虛,則應餘菩薩不得菩提;由二聚不虛故,是義不然,故佛不一。一切者,若言唯有一佛,則應是佛不利益一切眾生;由佛建立一切眾生作佛故,是義不然,故佛不一。無始者,若言唯有最初一佛,是佛應無福智二聚而得成佛,是義不然,故佛不一。無別者,若言有別佛無福智二聚,是義不然,故佛不一。不多者,由依同故,一切諸佛法身由依無漏界故。已說諸佛智,次說入佛方便。
【偈】
分別若恒有, 真實則永無;
分別若永無, 真實則恒有。
〔釋〕若分別自性是恒有,則真實自性是永無,由不可得故。若分別自性是永無,則真實自性是恒有,由可得故。
【偈】
欲修最上修, 不見一切修;
欲得最上得, 不見一切得。
〔釋〕彼如是最上修,彼修不可得。彼如是最上得,彼得不可得。
【偈】
尊重及長時, 觀佛希有法,
緣此速得佛, 去佛菩提遠。
〔釋〕若有菩薩於佛世尊極生尊重,及長時正勤觀佛未曾有法,緣此觀心及長時精進,而謂我當速得無上菩提。應知如是菩薩,去佛菩提則為甚遠。何以故?彼有慢故。
【偈】
觀法唯分別, 此義如前知;
菩薩無分別, 說彼速成佛。
〔釋〕若菩薩觀一切諸法唯是分別,觀彼分別亦無分別,即得入彼無生忍位。由如此義,說得菩提。已說入佛方便,次說諸佛同事。
【偈】
應知諸河水, 別依亦別事,
水少虫用少, 未入大海故。
一切入大海, 一依亦一事,
水大虫用大, 亦復常無盡。
如是諸別解, 別意亦別業,
解少利益少, 未入佛體故。
一切入佛體, 一解亦一意,
解大利益大, 極聚亦無盡。
〔釋〕別水,譬諸菩薩別解。別依,譬諸菩薩別意。一水,譬諸如來一解。一依,譬諸如來一意。由諸河水別故,水事業亦別。由水少故,水虫受用亦少。何以故?未得同入大海故。諸菩薩亦爾,由解別故作業亦別,由解少故利益眾生亦少。何以故?未得同入佛體故。諸水若入大海,即同一依、即同一體,由水一故事業亦一,由水大故水虫受用亦大。若諸菩薩同入佛體,即同一意、即同一解,由解一故作業亦一,由解大故利益亦大,極一切眾生聚亦無有盡。如是已說諸佛體用,次說一偈勸進悕求。
【偈】
無比圓白法, 眾生利樂因,
樂住無盡藏, 智者應求發。
〔釋〕無比圓白法者,由佛自利成就故。眾生利樂因者,由佛利他成就故。樂住無盡藏者,由佛善根無過無上,是無盡樂藏故。智者應求發者,有智之人應求如此最勝樂住而發大菩提心故。菩提品究竟。
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
本品為全論『經眼』:聚焦轉八識成四智、束四智具三身,以及無漏法界的甚深義。
前面已說「菩薩成熟眾生」,接著說「菩薩得一切種智」。
一切難已行, 一切善已集, 一切時已度, 一切障已斷。
這偈顯示「一切種智」的「因」已圓滿。
- 一切難已行:因為具足修行了無量百千種難行之行,未曾疲倦。
- 一切善已集:因為具足聚集了諸波羅蜜為自性的善根。
- 一切時已度:因為具足經歷了長時的大劫阿僧祇。
- 一切障已斷:因為具足斷除了一切大乘的障——也就是諸地所有的微細障。
成就一切種, 此即為佛身, 譬如大篋開, 眾寶無不現。
這偈顯示「一切種智」的「果」已圓滿。有三層意義分別:一是「至得」、二是「自性」、三是「譬喻」。
- 成就一切種:是就「至得」而分別——從此以後成就了一切種智。
- 此即為佛身:是就「自性」而分別——就說這一切種智是佛的身體。
- 譬如大篋開,眾寶無不現:是就「譬喻」而分別——不可思議的菩提分之寶都現在眼前。
已說一切種智是佛身,接著說這身「無二相」(不落有無二邊)。
白法為佛身, 非無亦非有, 佛為法寶因, 法則善根因。
- 白法為佛身:把六波羅蜜等一切善法轉成佛的本體。
- 非無亦非有:這本體並非「無」,為什麼?因為它與真如無別。卻也並非「有」,為什麼?因為它的自性不成就(無有實自性可成立)。這就叫「無二相」。
- 佛為法寶因:佛是「法寶」之因——因為佛宣說一切法,又以神通力(顯發法寶)。
- 法則善根因:法是「善根」之因——以眾生為田、善根為穀;如此法寶在所教化的眾生田中,生長善根之穀。
具法亦離法, 如藏亦如雲, 生法雨法雨, 故成如是譬。
這偈再次顯前面的義理。
- 具法亦離法:諸佛具足一切善法、遠離一切不善法。
- 如藏亦如雲:佛寶如「大藏」,法寶如「大雲」。〔問〕這是取什麼義?〔答〕取『生法、雨法』之義——能生法、能雨法,所以成這譬喻:佛寶能出生法寶,與大藏相似;法寶能生長一切眾生的善根,與大雲相似。
已說佛身「無二相」,接著說這(佛)是「無上歸依」。
諸佛常救護, 眾生三染污, 諸惑諸惡行, 及以生老死。
這偈略說「救護」之義。
- 諸佛常救護:因為畢竟救護(究竟到底地救護)。〔問〕救護什麼法?〔答〕救護眾生的三種染污——煩惱染污、業染污、生染污。
- 諸惑:就是煩惱染污。
- 諸惡行:就是業染污。
- 及以生老死:就是生染污。 〔問〕怎麼個救護?〔答〕對這三種(染污的)眾生,一切時中救護不捨,這就是「畢竟」之義。
諸災及惡趣, 身見亦小乘, 如是諸眾生, 一切皆救護。
這偈廣說「救護」之義。
- 諸災:指盲、聾、瘖、瘂、狂、亂、形體殘缺等眾生。由佛力故,盲者得見、聾者得聽、瘂者能言、狂者得正、亂者得定、形殘者得具足——如此救護。
- 惡趣:指地獄等眾生。佛放光照觸,令他們得離苦、不再墮入——如此救護。
- 身見:指執著有「我」的眾生。令他們得「人無我」,解悟而入二乘涅槃——如此救護。
- 小乘:指二乘種性不定的眾生。以方便引導他們趣入大乘——如此救護。
佛為勝歸處, 無比故無上, 如前種種畏, 無不令脫者。
這偈顯示『歸依殊勝』。由於佛無可譬喻,所以是「無上」。因此前面所說三種染污的眾生、以及其餘諸災等眾生,一切都能救護。
諸佛善滿身, 一切世間勝, 妙法化眾生, 以度悲海故。
這偈顯示『歸依殊勝』之因。
- 諸佛善滿身,一切世間勝:這是由於「自利究竟」——因為十力、四無畏等諸種善功德為自性而圓滿。
- 妙法化眾生,以度悲海故:善於了解教化眾生的方便,並且度到了「大悲海」的彼岸而究竟。
盡於未來際, 普及一切生, 恒時利益彼, 是說歸依大。
這偈顯示『歸依廣大』。「大」有三義:一是「時大」——窮盡一切眾生的生死邊際。二是「境大」——以一切眾生為境。三是「事大」——一切時中作利益、救脫其苦、令得出離。
已說「無上歸依」,接著說「如來轉依相」。
二障種恒隨, 彼滅極廣斷, 白法圓滿故, 依轉二道成。
這偈顯示「轉依」有「離」也有「得」。
- 二障種恒隨,彼滅極廣斷:這是說明『所治的遠離』——所謂煩惱障、智障兩種種子,無始以來恒常隨逐(眾生),如今得以永滅。「極」,指一切地;「廣」,指一切種——這些都斷除了。
- 白法圓滿故,依轉二道成:這是說明『能治的成就』——佛體與最上圓滿的白法相應,那時「依」一轉,便得二道成就:一是得到『極清淨的出世智道』、二是得到『無邊所識境界的智道』,這就叫「轉依」。
彼處如來住, 不動如山王, 尚悲樂滅人, 況著諸有者。
這偈顯示「如來轉依」在諸轉之中最為殊勝。為什麼?因為如來轉依後安住於「無漏界」之處,如同山王鎮地、安住不動。如此一轉之後,見到聲聞、緣覺這些樂於寂滅的人,尚且生起憐愍,何況那些遠在下劣、執著「有」而苦惱的眾生(更要憐愍救護)。
他利及無上, 不轉及不生, 廣大與無二, 無住亦平等, 殊勝與遍授, 是說如來轉, 顯示十功德, 差別義應知。
這兩偈顯示「如來轉依」有十種功德差別。哪十種?
- 他義轉:轉依之後,是為了利他。
- 無上轉:轉依之後,於一切法中而得自在,超過了二乘的轉。
- 不轉轉:轉依之後,染污諸因不能再轉動此「依」,因為那「依」已轉(已成無漏)。
- 不生轉:轉依之後,一切染污法畢竟不再生起。
- 廣大轉:轉依之後,示現得大菩提以及般涅槃。
- 無二轉:轉依之後,生死與涅槃沒有二別。
- 不住轉:轉依之後,有為、無為都不住著。
- 平等轉:轉依之後,與聲聞、緣覺同樣解脫了煩惱障。
- 殊勝轉:轉依之後,十力、四無畏等一切佛法無與倫比。
- 遍授轉:轉依之後,恒常以一切乘來教授(眾生)。
如空遍一切, 佛亦一切遍; 虛空遍諸色, 諸佛遍眾生。
這偈顯示「佛體一切遍」,與虛空相似。前二句是直說、後二句是釋說:譬如虛空遍滿一切色聚,佛體也是這樣,遍滿一切眾生聚。若有人因為現見眾生並非是佛,便說「佛體不遍」,這道理不對——那是因為(眾生的佛性)還未成就(並非佛體不遍)。
譬如水器壞, 月像不現前; 如是眾生過, 佛像亦不現。
這偈顯示『佛體雖遍,而眾生不見』。譬如水器破壞了,就不見月的影像;同樣,眾生因過失(業障)而不見佛的形像——這道理是成立的。
譬如火聚性, 或然或滅盡; 如是諸佛化, 或出或涅槃。
這偈顯示『諸佛的教化有出有沒』。譬如火的性質有時熾然、有時滅盡;諸佛的教化也是這樣,有時示現出世、有時示現涅槃。
如此已說「如來轉依」,接著說「如來事業恒無功用」(佛的事業恒常自然而起、不假造作)。
意珠及天鼓, 自然成自事; 佛化及佛說, 無思亦如是。
這偈顯示「佛事無功用」。譬如如意寶珠,雖然無心,卻能自然作種種變現;如來也是這樣,雖然沒有功用之心,卻能自然起種種變化。又譬如天鼓,雖然無心,卻能自然出種種音聲;如來也是這樣,雖然沒有功用之心,卻能自然說種種妙法。
依空業無間, 而業有增減; 依界事不斷, 而事有生滅。
這偈顯示「佛事無間」(不間斷)。譬如世間萬事依著虛空而作,無時斷絕;諸佛也是這樣,依著無漏界而作佛事,也無斷絕。又譬如世間依空所作之事有增有減;諸佛也是這樣,依無漏界而作佛事,也有生有滅。
已說『無功用心而不捨佛事』,接著說「無漏法界甚深」。
如前後亦爾, 及離一切障, 非淨非不淨, 佛說名為如。
這偈顯示「法界清淨相」。
- 如前後亦爾:所謂「非淨」——因為(法界)自性本不染污(本來如此,不是後來才被洗淨,故不可說它是「淨」)。
- 及離一切障:所謂「非不淨」——因為後來客塵已離(既已離障,也不可說它是「不淨」)。
- 非淨非不淨,佛說名為如:所以佛說這(法界)是「如」——非淨、非不淨。這就叫「法界清淨相」。
清淨空無我, 佛說第一我; 諸佛我淨故, 故佛名大我。
這偈顯示「法界大我相」。
- 清淨空無我:這無漏界以「第一無我」為自性。
- 佛說第一我:所謂「第一無我」就是「清淨如」,那清淨如就是諸佛「我」的自性。
- 諸佛我淨故,故佛名大我:由於佛的這個「我」最得清淨,所以稱佛為「大我」。由這層義意,諸佛在無漏界中建立「第一我」,這就叫「法界大我相」。
非體非非體, 如是說佛體; 是故作是論, 定是無記法。
這偈顯示「法界無記相」。
- 非體:因為人、法二相不可說(不可說有實體相)。
- 非非體:因為「如」相實有(真如非全無)。
- 如是說佛體:由這緣故,說佛體『非體、非非體』。
- 是故作是論,定是無記法:所謂「無記」,指『死後有如來、死後無如來、死後亦有亦無如來、死後非有非無如來』——這樣的四句不可記別,所以說法界是「無記相」。
譬如鐵熱息, 譬如眼瞖除, 心智息亦爾, 不說有無體。
這偈顯示「法界解脫相」。
- 譬如鐵熱息、譬如眼瞖除:這兩件事——鐵的熱止息了、眼的瞖(翳障)除去了——可以說是『非體、非非體』。為什麼?「非體」,因為熱與瞖已無相;「非非體」,因為止息之相仍有體(鐵還在、眼還在)。
- 心智息亦爾,不說有無體:諸佛的心智,以「貪」為熱、以「無明」為瞖;那二者若止息了,也說是『非體、非非體』。為什麼?「非體」,因為貪與無明已息;「非非體」,因為心慧的解脫仍有。這就叫「法界解脫相」。
已說「相甚深」,接著說「處甚深」。
諸佛無漏界, 非一亦非多, 前身隨順故, 非身如空故。
這偈顯示「法界處甚深」。諸佛的無漏法界『非一、亦非多』。為什麼?
- 非一:因為隨順前身(隨各各因地之身而有別,故不可說唯一)。
- 非多:因為(其體)非身。〔問〕怎麼說「非身」?〔答〕因為如同虛空(無形質可分,故不可說多)。 這就叫「法界處甚深」。已說「處甚深」,接著說「業甚深」。
譬如大寶藏, 眾寶之所依; 淨界亦如是, 佛法之依止。
這偈顯示『法界的依止業』——由於清淨法界是十力、四無畏等諸菩提分之寶的所依止。
譬如密雲布, 灑雨成百穀; 淨界亦如是, 流善熟眾生。
這偈顯示『法界成熟眾生的業』——由於從清淨法界流出諸善根、成熟眾生。
譬如日月盈, 皎淨輪圓滿; 淨界亦如是, 善淨聚圓滿。
這偈顯示『法界到究竟的業』。「聚」指福、智二聚——由於清淨法界,這福智二聚得以圓滿。
譬如日輪出, 流光照一切; 淨界亦如是, 流說化群生。
這偈顯示『法界宣說正法的業』。
譬如日光合, 同事照世間; 淨界亦如是, 佛合同業化。
這偈顯示『法界變化所作的業』。譬如眾多日、眾多光一時和合,同作一事——所謂使物乾、使物熟等。同樣,眾多佛、眾多智一時和合,同作一業——所謂變化等。
譬如日光照, 無限亦一時; 淨界佛光照, 二事亦如是。
這偈顯示『法界無分別的業』。譬如日光普照,沒有分限、也是一時(同時遍照)。同樣,佛光普照,也是無限、一時。
譬如諸日光, 說有雲等翳; 淨界諸佛智, 說有眾生障。
這偈顯示『法界不作(業)』(有時不起所作)。譬如日光被雲等遮翳,所以不照;同樣,佛光被眾生過失所障——五濁太多——所以不有所作。
譬如滋灰力, 染衣種種色; 淨界行願力, 解脫種種智。
這偈顯示『法界解脫智的業』。譬如染衣,由於「滋灰」(媒染劑)之力,有的地方能得種種色、有的地方不得種種色。三乘的淨界也是這樣:由於「行願」之力,諸佛的解脫得種種智、二乘的解脫不得種種智。
無漏界甚深, 相處業三種, 諸佛如是說, 譬如染畫空。
這偈再次顯前面「甚深」之義。
- 無漏界甚深,相處業三種:這無漏界,世尊略說三種甚深——一是「相甚深」、二是「處甚深」、三是「業甚深」。「相甚深」有四種:一清淨相、二大我相、三無記相、四解脫相,依次(由前四偈所顯)。「處甚深」一種:所謂『非一非多、不住』(由第五偈所顯)。「業甚深」有八種:一寶依止業、二成熟眾生業、三到究竟業、四說正法業、五化所作業、六無分別業、七智不作業、八解脫智業,依次(由後八偈所顯)。
- 諸佛如是說,譬如染畫空:這無漏界沒有戲論,譬如虛空,所以甚深。要這樣分別地解說它的甚深,就好像在虛空上染色、在虛空上作畫——這道理應當了知。
一切無別故, 得如清淨故, 故說諸眾生, 名為如來藏。
這偈顯示「法界是如來藏」。
- 一切無別故:一切眾生、一切諸佛平等無有差別,所以名為「如」。
- 得如清淨故:得到清淨的「如」作為自性,所以名為「如來」。 由這道理,可以說一切眾生名為「如來藏」。
已說「無漏界甚深」,接著說「諸佛變化」。
聲聞及緣覺, 菩薩與如來, 初化退世間, 至佛退菩薩。
這偈顯示「增上變化」。一切世間的變化,聲聞的變化能退(勝過、覆退);一切聲聞的變化,緣覺的變化能退;一切緣覺的變化,菩薩的變化能退;一切菩薩的變化,諸佛的變化能退。沒有任何一人的變化能退諸佛的變化——所以如來的變化最得增上。
如是佛變化, 無量不思議, 隨人隨世界, 隨時種種現。
這偈顯示「甚深變化」。這甚深有二種:一是「無量」、二是「不思議」。〔問〕這事怎麼說?〔答〕隨什麼根器的人、隨什麼世界、隨什麼時節,照其差別,或多或少作種種變化。如此既無量、又不思議——所以如來的變化最為甚深。以下接著說「別轉變化」(一一別別轉識而起的變化)。
如是五根轉, 變化得增上, 諸義遍所作, 功德千二百。
這偈顯示『轉五根的變化』。這變化得到二種增上:一是得「諸義遍所作」——一一根都能互用一切境界(眼能作耳之用等)。二是得「功德千二百」——一一根各得一千二百種功德。
如是意根轉, 變化得增上, 極淨無分別, 恒隨變化行。
這偈顯示『轉意根的變化』。「意根」指染污識(第七識)。由這一轉,得到『極清淨的無分別智』,恒常與一切變化隨行、共同所作。
如是義受轉, 變化得增上, 淨土如所欲, 受用皆現前。
這偈顯示『轉義、受的變化』。「義」指五塵(色聲香味觸)、「受」指五識;由這二者一轉,剎土清淨,所欲之物現前、隨意受用。
如是分別轉, 變化得增上, 諸智所作業, 恒時無礙行。
這偈顯示『轉分別的變化』。「分別」指意識(第六識);由這一轉,諸智所作的一切時變化都無有障礙。
如是安立轉, 變化得增上, 住佛不動句, 不住於涅槃。
這偈顯示『轉安立的變化』。「安立」指器世界;由這一轉,安住於佛的「不動」無漏法界,得「不般涅槃」(不入寂滅),恒起增上變化。
如是欲染轉, 變化得增上, 住佛無上樂, 示現妻無染。
這偈顯示『轉欲染的變化』。由這一轉,得二種變化:一是得安住於佛的「無上樂」、二是得「於妻無染」(雖示現有妻而無染著)。
如是空想轉, 變化得增上, 隨欲一切得, 所去皆無擁。
這偈顯示『轉空想的變化』。由這一轉,得二種變化:一是「所欲皆得」——因為得了「虛空藏」。二是「所去無擁」(去處無有阻礙)——因為得了「虛空解」。
如是無量轉, 如是無量化, 不思議所作, 諸佛依無垢。
這偈總結前面的義理。由於有無量的「轉」,便得無量的「變化」。如此諸佛的不思議事業,一切都依著無漏法界——這道理應當了知。
已說「諸佛變化」,接著說「諸佛成熟眾生」。
令集亦令長, 令熟亦令脫, 熟熟不無餘, 世間無盡故。
這偈顯示『次第成熟(眾生)之因』。未集善根的,令他聚集;已集善根的,令他增長;已長善根的,令他成熟;已熟善根的,令他解脫,使得最極清淨——如此十方諸佛各各善加宣說。『成熟了又成熟,卻不入般涅槃(不無餘而捨)』,為什麼?因為諸世間無有窮盡(眾生度不盡,故佛不捨)。
難得已具得, 處處為物歸, 希有非希有, 由得善方便。
這偈顯示『已成熟菩薩之行,非希有相』。
- 難得已具得,處處為物歸:無上菩提的最上功德是未曾有的,如今已具足相應;由這相應,便能恒在十方世界作眾生的歸處。
- 希有非希有:如此處處成熟眾生,是為「希有」;但這希有也是「非希有」。為什麼?因為已得善方便。所謂「善方便」,就是隨眾生根機之道——也就是清淨之行。
轉法及法沒, 得道亦涅槃, 處處方便起, 不動真法界。
這偈顯示『普遍成熟(眾生)之因』。
- 轉法及法沒,得道亦涅槃:在一剎那中,有處示現轉無量法輪、有處示現正法滅盡、有處示現得大菩提、有處示現入於涅槃——這是因為眾生的行(根機)各各不同。
- 處處方便起,不動真法界:若眾生應當可被成熟,如來便隨他的住處、處處教化,然而在無漏法界中卻也不動(不曾移動)。
不起分別意, 成熟去來今, 處處化眾生, 三門常示現。
這偈顯示『自然成熟(眾生)之因』。
- 不起分別意,成熟去來今:一切諸佛不作這樣的念頭:「我曾成熟眾生、我當成熟眾生、我今成熟眾生。」為什麼?因為無分別。
- 處處化眾生,三門常示現:雖然無功用,卻在一切時中以諸善根,於十方世界普遍以「三門」成熟眾生。「三門」,指三乘的教門。
如日自然光, 照闇成百穀, 法日光亦爾, 滅惑熟眾生。
這偈用譬喻顯「自然」之義。譬如日輪不費勤勞方便、自然放光,處處破暗、成熟百穀;諸佛也是這樣,雖然無功用,卻以「法日」之光處處滅惑、成熟眾生。
一燈燃眾燈, 極聚明無盡; 一熟化多熟, 無盡化亦然。
這偈顯示『展轉成熟(眾生)之因』。譬如一盞燈傳燃眾燈,極大的燈聚無量無數,而那一燈(之明)並不窮盡;諸佛也是這樣,一佛成熟(一眾生),又化使眾多成熟,極大的眾生聚無量無數,然而其化度之力也是無有窮盡。
巨海納眾流, 無厭復無溢; 佛界攝眾善, 不滿亦不增。
這偈顯示『無厭成熟(眾生)之因』。譬如巨海廣納百川,沒有厭足、也不盈溢,因為(其量)能容受。佛界也是這樣,常攝無量清淨善根,卻不滿足、也不增長,因為(佛界之德)希有(不可以滿增測度)。
已說「諸佛成熟眾生」,接著說「諸佛法界清淨」。
二障已永除, 法如得清淨, 諸物及緣智, 自在亦無盡。
這偈顯示「法界性義」。
- 二障已永除,法如得清淨:這是「清淨相」——由於煩惱障與智障都已永盡。
- 諸物及緣智,自在亦無盡:這是「自在相」——由於對「諸物」與『緣彼之智』這兩種都得自在、永無窮盡。
一切種如智, 修淨法界因, 利樂化眾生, 此果亦無盡。
這偈顯示「法界因義」。
- 一切種如智,修淨法界因:為了使法界清淨,在一切時中修習「一切種如門智」作為因。
- 利樂化眾生,此果亦無盡:為了教化眾生,在一切時中給予一切眾生『利、樂』二種果,恒無窮盡。
發起身口心, 三業恒時化, 二門及二聚, 方便悉圓滿。
這偈顯示「法界業義」。
- 發起身口心,三業恒時化:發起身業、口業、心業,一切時中教化眾生。
- 二門及二聚,方便悉圓滿:具足『二門、二聚』作為方便。「二門」,指三昧門、陀羅尼門;「二聚」,指福德聚、智慧聚。
自性及法食, 變化位差別, 此由法界淨, 諸佛之所說。
這偈顯示「法界位義」。
- 自性及法食,變化位差別:所謂自性身、食身(受用身)、化身,這是「位」的差別。
- 此由法界淨,諸佛之所說:若法界不清淨,這三位就不成立。
已說「諸佛法界清淨」,接著說「諸佛三身」。
性身及食身、 化身合三身, 應知第一身, 餘二之依止。
一切諸佛有三種身:一是「自性身」,由「轉依」之相而立。二是「食身」,由在大集會眾中作「法食」(以法為食、施法滋養)而立。三是「化身」,由作所化眾生的利益而立。這當中應當了知:自性身是食身、化身的依止,因為它是「本」。
食身於諸界, 受用有差別, 眾土名身業, 一切皆異故。
「食身」在一切世界中,諸徒眾、諸剎土、諸名號、諸身、諸業——這些受用之事都各各不同。
平等微細身, 受用身相合, 應知受用身, 得是化身因。
- 平等:指「自性身」——一切諸佛平等無別。
- 微細:因為這身難以了知。
- 受用身(與平等身相合):「受用身」就是「食身」,這身與平等身(自性身)相合,因為它是依著(自性身)而起的。
- 應知受用身復是化身因:因為(受用身)隨所欲受用而一切示現(化身),所以又是化身之因。
化佛無量化, 是故名化身, 二身二利成, 一切種建立。
由於「化身」諸佛在一切時中化作無量差別,佛由這「化」而名為「化身」。「二身」,指食身、化身;「二利」,指自利、他利。食身以「自利成就」為相,化身以「他利成就」為相。如此二利在一切種上都成就,便依次建立食身與化身。
工巧及出生, 得道般涅槃, 示此大方便, 令他得解脫。
再者,「化身」在一切時中教化眾生,或現工巧(技藝)、或現出生、或現得菩提、或現般涅槃——如此種種示現大方便,都令眾生得解脫。這是「他利成就」之相。
應知佛三身, 是佛身皆攝, 自他利依止, 示現悉三身。
應當了知這三身攝盡一切諸佛之身,因為它示現了一切「自利、他利」的依止。
由依心業故, 三佛俱平等, 自性無間續, 三佛俱常住。
那三種身,依次來說,一切諸佛都平等:
- 由「依」(依止)故,一切諸佛的自性身平等——因為法界無別。
- 由「心」故,一切諸佛的食身平等——因為佛心無別。
- 由「業」故,一切諸佛的化身平等——因為同一所作。
再者,一切諸佛同樣「常住」:
- 由「自性常」故,一切諸佛的自性身常住——因為畢竟無漏。
- 由「無間常」故,一切諸佛的食身常住——因為說法無有斷絕。
- 由「相續常」故,一切諸佛的化身常住——因為雖在此處滅、卻又在彼處現。
已說「諸佛身」,接著說「諸佛智」。
四智鏡不動, 三智之所依, 八七六五識, 次第轉得故。
- 四智鏡不動,三智之所依:一切諸佛有四種智——一是「鏡智」(大圓鏡智)、二是「平等智」(平等性智)、三是「觀智」(妙觀察智)、四是「作事智」(成所作智)。那「鏡智」以「不動」為相,恒常作為其餘三智的依止。為什麼?因為(其餘)三智是「動」的。
- 八七六五識,次第轉得故:轉第八識(阿賴耶識)得鏡智,轉第七識(末那識)得平等智,轉第六識(意識)得觀智,轉前五識(眼耳鼻舌身)得作事智——這道理應當了知。
鏡智緣無分, 相續恒不斷, 不愚諸所識, 諸相不現前。
這偈顯示「轉第八識得鏡智」。
- 鏡智緣無分:(鏡智)緣一切境界時,不作分段去緣(不把對象切成一塊塊)。
- 相續恒不斷:在一切時中常行、不曾斷絕。
- 不愚諸所識:了知一切境界,障已永盡(對所識無有愚昧)。
- 諸相不現前:緣諸境界時,離開(粗顯的)行相之緣、無有分別。
鏡智諸智因, 說是大智藏, 餘身及餘智, 像現從此起。
這偈顯示『鏡智的作用』。
- 鏡智諸智因,說是大智藏:那平等智等諸智,一切種都以鏡智為因,所以這智譬如「大藏」——因為它是諸智之藏。
- 餘身及餘智,像現從此起:『其餘的身』指受用身等、『其餘的智』指平等智等;由那些身的影像、智的影像,一切都從這智出生,所以佛說這智為「鏡智」(如鏡現像)。
眾生平等智, 修淨證菩提, 不住於涅槃, 以無究竟故。
這偈顯示「轉第七識得平等智」。
- 眾生平等智,修淨證菩提:若諸菩薩證法現前時,就得到『對一切眾生平等』的智;若把這智修習到最極清淨,就得無上菩提。
- 不住於涅槃,以無究竟故:由於眾生無盡,所以(度生之事)沒有終極;正因沒有終極,所以不住涅槃。由這層義,說它為「平等智」。
大慈與大悲, 是二恒無絕, 眾生若有信, 佛像即現前。
這偈顯示『平等智的作用』。
- 大慈與大悲,是二恒無絕:諸佛如來在一切時中隨逐眾生。為什麼?因為大慈、大悲無有斷絕。
- 眾生若有信,佛像即現前:照眾生所信,隨之而現——所以有的眾生見如來是青色、有的見如來是黃色,如此一切。 以上鏡智、平等智這前二智,就是「法身」。
觀智識所識, 恒時無有礙, 此智如大藏, 總持三昧依。
這偈顯示「轉第六識得觀智」。觀智對於所認識的一切境界恒無障礙,譬如大藏,是一切「陀羅尼門」(總持)、一切「三昧門」(定)的依止。為什麼?因為這二門都從這智而生。
恒在大眾中, 種種皆示現, 能斷諸疑網, 雨大法雨故。
這偈顯示『觀智的作用』,其義如偈所說(觀智恒在大眾會中種種示現、能斷眾生疑網、降下大法雨)。這觀智就是「食身」。
事智於諸界, 種種化事起, 無量不思議, 為利群生故。
這偈顯示「轉前五識得作事智」。那作事智在一切世界中作種種變化之事,無量無邊、不可思議。如此等業,都是為了利益一切眾生。這作事智就是「化身」。
攝持及等心, 開法亦作事, 如是依四義, 次第四智起。
- 攝持:指聞法的攝持。
- 等心:指對一切眾生得「自他平等」。
- 開法:指演說正法。
- 作事:指起種種化業。 依第一義,鏡智起;依第二義,平等智起;依第三義,觀智起;依第四義,作事智起。
性別及不虛, 一切亦無始, 無別故不一, 依同故不多。
這偈顯示『諸佛不一、不多』。 不一——由於『性別、不虛、一切、無始、無別』五義:
- 性別:因為無邊諸佛的性各別。若說只有一佛,卻又有「當得菩提」的(菩薩將成佛),這道理不對,所以佛「不一」。
- 不虛:若福智之聚是虛(無實效),那麼其餘菩薩就不該得菩提;由福智二聚不虛故,可知(一佛之說)不對,所以佛「不一」。
- 一切:若說只有一佛,那這佛就不能利益一切眾生;由於佛建立(成就)一切眾生作佛,可知(一佛之說)不對,所以佛「不一」。
- 無始:若說只有最初的一佛,那這佛應當沒有福智二聚就成佛了,這道理不對,所以佛「不一」。
- 無別:若說另有某佛沒有福智二聚(而成佛),這道理不對,所以佛「不一」。
不多——由於「依同」故:一切諸佛的法身都依著無漏界(同一所依,故不多)。
已說「諸佛智」,接著說「入佛方便」。
分別若恒有, 真實則永無; 分別若永無, 真實則恒有。
若「分別」自性是恒有,那麼「真實」自性就永無——因為(真實)不可得。若「分別」自性是永無,那麼「真實」自性就恒有——因為(真實)可得。
欲修最上修, 不見一切修; 欲得最上得, 不見一切得。
那「最上修」是這樣的:那修不可得(無修相可見,才是最上修)。那「最上得」是這樣的:那得不可得(無得相可見,才是最上得)。
尊重及長時, 觀佛希有法, 緣此速得佛, 去佛菩提遠。
若有菩薩對佛世尊極生尊重、又長時正勤觀佛的未曾有法,緣著這觀心及長時的精進,便以為「我當速得無上菩提」——應知這樣的菩薩,離佛的菩提反而甚遠。為什麼?因為他有「慢」(我慢之心)。
觀法唯分別, 此義如前知; 菩薩無分別, 說彼速成佛。
若菩薩觀一切諸法唯是「分別」(如前面所知之義),又觀那「分別」也無分別,便得入「無生忍位」。由這道理,說他得菩提。
已說「入佛方便」,接著說「諸佛同事」(諸佛同一體用)。
應知諸河水, 別依亦別事, 水少虫用少, 未入大海故。 一切入大海, 一依亦一事, 水大虫用大, 亦復常無盡。 如是諸別解, 別意亦別業, 解少利益少, 未入佛體故。 一切入佛體, 一解亦一意, 解大利益大, 極聚亦無盡。
- 「別水」譬諸菩薩的「別解」;「別依」譬諸菩薩的「別意」;「一水」譬諸如來的「一解」;「一依」譬諸如來的「一意」。
- 由於諸河水各別,所以水的事業也各別;由於水少,所以水中之虫的受用也少。為什麼?因為還未同入大海。諸菩薩也是這樣:由於解(理解)各別,所作之業也各別;由於解少,利益眾生也少。為什麼?因為還未同入佛體。
- 諸水若入大海,就同一依、同一體;由於水成一,事業也成一;由於水大,水虫的受用也大。若諸菩薩同入佛體,就同一意、同一解;由於解成一,所作之業也成一;由於解大,利益也大,乃至遍盡一切眾生聚也無有窮盡。
如此已說「諸佛體用」,接著說一偈勸勉精進、悕求(菩提)。
無比圓白法, 眾生利樂因, 樂住無盡藏, 智者應求發。
- 無比圓白法:由於佛的「自利成就」。
- 眾生利樂因:由於佛的「利他成就」。
- 樂住無盡藏:由於佛的善根無過、無上,是『無盡的樂藏』。
- 智者應求發:有智之人,應當為求得這最殊勝的「樂住」而發大菩提心。
菩提品究竟(圓滿)。
This chapter is the “eye” of the whole treatise: the turning of the eight consciousnesses into the four wisdoms, the gathering of the four wisdoms into the three bodies, and the profundity of the untainted dharma-realm.
Having spoken of how "the bodhisattva matures sentient beings," the text next speaks of how "the bodhisattva attains the wisdom of all modes" (一切種智, omniscience in every aspect).
All that is hard, he has already done; all that is good, he has already amassed; all time, he has already traversed; all obstruction, he has already cut off.
This verse shows that the cause of the wisdom of all modes is fulfilled.
- All that is hard, he has already done: because he has fully practiced countless hundreds of thousands of kinds of arduous practice, never once weary.
- All that is good, he has already amassed: because he has fully gathered the roots of good whose own-nature is the perfections (諸波羅蜜, the pāramitās).
- All time, he has already traversed: because he has fully passed through the long span of the great incalculable eons (大劫阿僧祇, the great asaṃkhyeya kalpas).
- All obstruction, he has already cut off: because he has fully severed every obstruction of the great vehicle — that is, all the subtle obstructions belonging to the [bodhisattva] grounds.
Accomplished in every mode — this itself is the buddha-body; as when a great chest is opened, none of its many jewels fail to appear.
This verse shows that the fruit of the wisdom of all modes is fulfilled. There are three senses distinguished: first, attainment; second, own-nature; third, simile.
- Accomplished in every mode: this is the distinction by attainment — from this point onward one has accomplished the wisdom of all modes.
- This itself is the buddha-body: this is the distinction by own-nature — one says that this very wisdom of all modes is the body of a buddha.
- As when a great chest is opened, none of its many jewels fail to appear: this is the distinction by simile — the inconceivable jewels of the factors of awakening all appear before one.
Having stated that the wisdom of all modes is the buddha-body, the text next states that this body has "the mark of non-duality" (無二相, being free of the two extremes of existent and non-existent).
The white dharmas are the buddha-body — neither non-existent nor existent; the Buddha is the cause of the dharma-jewel, and the Dharma is the cause of roots of good.
- The white dharmas are the buddha-body: the six perfections and all other good dharmas (白法, the pure, wholesome dharmas) are transformed into the very substance of a buddha.
- Neither non-existent nor existent: this substance is not "non-existent" — why? because it is no different from suchness (真如, tathatā). Yet it is also not "existent" — why? because its own-nature is not [independently] established (it has no substantial own-nature that could stand on its own). This is called the mark of non-duality.
- The Buddha is the cause of the dharma-jewel: the Buddha is the cause of the "dharma-jewel" — because he proclaims all dharmas, and by his supernormal power [reveals the dharma-jewel].
- The Dharma is the cause of roots of good: the Dharma is the cause of "roots of good" — taking sentient beings as the field and roots of good as the grain; thus the dharma-jewel, in the field of the sentient beings it teaches, grows the grain of the roots of good.
Endowed with the dharmas yet apart from the dharmas, like a store and like a cloud; giving birth to dharma and raining down the rain of dharma — thus is the simile made.
This verse again brings out the previous meaning.
- Endowed with the dharmas yet apart from the dharmas: the buddhas are endowed with all good dharmas and apart from all unwholesome dharmas.
- Like a store and like a cloud: the buddha-jewel is like a "great store," the dharma-jewel like a "great cloud." 〔Question〕 In what sense is this taken? 〔Answer〕 It is taken in the sense of "giving birth to dharma, raining down dharma" — able to give birth to dharma, able to rain down dharma, and so the simile is made: the buddha-jewel can produce the dharma-jewel, resembling a great store; the dharma-jewel can grow the roots of good of all sentient beings, resembling a great cloud.
Having stated that the buddha-body has "the mark of non-duality," the text next states that it is "the unsurpassed refuge" (無上歸依).
The buddhas ever rescue and protect sentient beings from the three defilements — the afflictions, the evil deeds, and birth-old-age-death.
This verse states the meaning of "rescue and protection" in brief.
- The buddhas ever rescue and protect: because they rescue and protect ultimately (畢竟, to the very end). 〔Question〕 What do they rescue and protect from? 〔Answer〕 From the three defilements of sentient beings — the defilement of the afflictions, the defilement of karma, the defilement of birth.
- The afflictions: that is, the defilement of the afflictions.
- The evil deeds: that is, the defilement of karma.
- And birth-old-age-death: that is, the defilement of birth. 〔Question〕 How do they rescue and protect? 〔Answer〕 Toward these three [defiled] kinds of sentient beings they rescue and protect at all times without abandoning them — this is the meaning of "ultimately."
The various calamities and the evil destinies, the view of self and also the lesser vehicle — sentient beings such as these, all of them he rescues and protects.
This verse states the meaning of "rescue and protection" at length.
- The various calamities: this refers to sentient beings who are blind, deaf, mute, dumb, mad, deranged, or physically maimed. By the Buddha's power the blind come to see, the deaf to hear, the mute to speak, the mad to become sane, the deranged to gain concentration, the maimed to become whole — thus he rescues and protects.
- The evil destinies: this refers to sentient beings in the hells and the like. He emits light that touches them, causing them to escape suffering and never fall in again — thus he rescues and protects.
- The view of self: this refers to sentient beings who cling to a "self." He causes them to attain the no-self of persons (人無我), to understand and enter the nirvāṇa of the two vehicles — thus he rescues and protects.
- The lesser vehicle: this refers to sentient beings of the two vehicles whose lineage is not fixed. By skillful means he draws and guides them into the great vehicle — thus he rescues and protects.
The Buddha is the supreme place of refuge — because he is beyond compare, therefore unsurpassed; from all the various terrors named before, there is none whom he does not set free.
This verse shows the "excellence of the refuge." Because the Buddha is beyond any simile, he is "unsurpassed." Therefore the three kinds of defiled sentient beings stated before, together with the beings of the various calamities and the rest, all of them he is able to rescue and protect.
The buddhas, their bodies replete with good, supreme in all the world, teach beings with the wondrous Dharma, for they have crossed the ocean of compassion.
This verse shows the "cause of the excellence of the refuge."
- The buddhas, their bodies replete with good, supreme in all the world: this is by "the ultimacy of self-benefit" — because the various good qualities such as the [ten] powers and the [four] fearlessnesses are fulfilled as their own-nature.
- Teach beings with the wondrous Dharma, for they have crossed the ocean of compassion: they well understand the skillful means of teaching sentient beings, and have crossed to the far shore of the "ocean of great compassion," ultimately.
To the very end of the future, reaching universally to every being, ever benefiting them — this is called the greatness of the refuge.
This verse shows the "greatness of the refuge." "Greatness" has three senses: first, greatness of time — exhausting the very limit of the birth-and-death of all sentient beings. Second, greatness of scope — taking all sentient beings as its scope. Third, greatness of activity — at all times performing benefit, rescuing and freeing them from suffering, causing them to escape.
Having stated the "unsurpassed refuge," the text next states "the mark of the Tathāgata's transformation of the basis" (如來轉依相, āśraya-parāvṛtti, the root turning of the defiled into the pure).
The seeds of the two obstructions ever attend; their cessation is a cutting-off most extreme and vast; because the white dharmas are fulfilled, the transformation of the basis accomplishes the two paths.
This verse shows that the transformation of the basis has both a "leaving-behind" and an "attaining."
- The seeds of the two obstructions ever attend; their cessation is a cutting-off most extreme and vast: this clarifies the "leaving-behind of what is to be countered" — namely, the seeds of the two obstructions (二障, the afflictive obstruction 煩惱障 and the cognitive obstruction 智障), which from time without beginning have ever attended [sentient beings], are now permanently extinguished. "Most extreme" means all the grounds; "vast" means all the modes — all of these are cut off.
- Because the white dharmas are fulfilled, the transformation of the basis accomplishes the two paths: this clarifies the "attaining of what does the countering" — the buddha-substance is joined with the supremely fulfilled white dharmas, and at that time, once the basis is turned, the two paths are accomplished: first, the attaining of "the path of the utterly pure supramundane wisdom"; second, the attaining of "the path of the wisdom whose objects are the boundless knowable realms." This is called the transformation of the basis.
There the Tathāgata dwells, unmoving as the king of mountains; still he pities those who delight in [mere] cessation — how much more those attached to existence.
This verse shows that the Tathāgata's transformation of the basis is the most excellent among all transformations. Why? Because after the Tathāgata's transformation of the basis he dwells in the place of the untainted realm (無漏界, the anāsrava-dhātu), like the king of mountains anchoring the earth, abiding unmoved. Having thus turned, he still gives rise to pity even toward the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas who delight in [mere] quiescent cessation — how much more toward the sentient beings, far off and lowly, who cling to "existence" and are steeped in suffering.
Benefiting others, and the unsurpassed; the un-turned and the unborn; the vast and the non-dual; the non-abiding and the equal; the excellent and the universally-conferring — this is called the Tathāgata's turning, displaying ten qualities: their distinctions should be understood.
These two verses show that the Tathāgata's transformation of the basis has ten distinct qualities. What are the ten?
- The turning that benefits others: after the transformation of the basis, it is for the benefit of others.
- The unsurpassed turning: after the transformation of the basis, one attains mastery over all dharmas, surpassing the turning of the two vehicles.
- The un-turned turning: after the transformation of the basis, the various defiling causes can no longer turn this "basis," because that basis has [already] been turned (become untainted).
- The unborn turning: after the transformation of the basis, all defiling dharmas ultimately no longer arise.
- The vast turning: after the transformation of the basis, one manifests the attaining of great awakening and of parinirvāṇa.
- The non-dual turning: after the transformation of the basis, saṃsāra and nirvāṇa are without duality.
- The non-abiding turning: after the transformation of the basis, one abides in neither the conditioned nor the unconditioned.
- The equal turning: after the transformation of the basis, one is, equally with the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas, liberated from the afflictive obstruction.
- The excellent turning: after the transformation of the basis, the powers, fearlessnesses, and all the other buddha-dharmas are without equal.
- The universally-conferring turning: after the transformation of the basis, one ever teaches by means of all the vehicles.
As space pervades everything, so the Buddha too pervades all; space pervades all forms, the buddhas pervade all beings.
This verse shows that "the buddha-substance pervades everything," resembling space. The first two lines state it directly, the latter two explain it: just as space pervades all aggregations of form, so too the buddha-substance pervades all aggregations of sentient beings. If someone, because sentient beings are seen not to be buddhas, were to say "the buddha-substance does not pervade [them]," this is not so — it is [only] that [the buddha-nature in beings] is not yet accomplished (not that the buddha-substance fails to pervade).
As when a water-vessel is broken, the moon's image does not appear before one, so through the faults of sentient beings the buddha-image likewise does not appear.
This verse shows that "though the buddha-substance pervades [all], sentient beings do not see it." Just as when a water-vessel is broken one does not see the moon's image, so through their faults (their karmic obstructions) sentient beings do not see the buddha-image — this principle holds.
As the nature of a mass of fire — now blazing, now burnt out, so the buddhas' teaching-work — now appearing, now [entering] nirvāṇa.
This verse shows that "the buddhas' teaching-work has its appearing and its passing." Just as the nature of fire is at times to blaze and at times to burn out, so too the buddhas' teaching-work: at times it manifests appearance in the world, at times it manifests nirvāṇa.
Having thus stated the Tathāgata's transformation of the basis, the text next states that "the Tathāgata's activity is ever without effort" (the buddha's activity ever arises naturally, without deliberate contrivance).
The wish-granting jewel and the heavenly drum accomplish their own work of themselves; the buddha's transforming and the buddha's teaching, though without thought, are likewise so.
This verse shows that "the buddha's activity is without effort." Just as the wish-granting jewel, though mindless, can of itself produce all manner of manifestations, so too the Tathāgata: though without a mind of effort, he can of himself give rise to all manner of transformations. And just as the heavenly drum, though mindless, can of itself send forth all manner of sounds, so too the Tathāgata: though without a mind of effort, he can of himself teach all manner of wondrous dharmas.
In dependence on space, activity is unbroken, yet activity has its increase and decrease; in dependence on the [untainted] realm, the work is uninterrupted, yet the work has its arising and ceasing.
This verse shows that "the buddha's activity is uninterrupted." Just as, in the world, all things are done in dependence on space, unbroken at any time, so too the buddhas: in dependence on the untainted realm they perform the buddha-work, and it too is unbroken. And just as, in the world, what is done in dependence on space has its increase and decrease, so too the buddhas: in dependence on the untainted realm they perform the buddha-work, and it too has its arising and ceasing.
Having stated that "with a mind free of effort [the buddha] does not forsake the buddha-work," the text next states that "the untainted dharma-realm is profound."
As before, so afterward as well; and apart from all obstruction — neither pure nor impure: the Buddha calls it "suchness."
This verse shows "the mark of the dharma-realm's purity."
- As before, so afterward as well: this is what is meant by "not pure" — because its own-nature is [always] undefiled (it is thus originally, not made clean only afterward, so it cannot be called "pure").
- And apart from all obstruction: this is what is meant by "not impure" — because the adventitious defilements (客塵, āgantuka-kleśa) have afterward been left behind (since obstruction is already gone, it cannot be called "impure").
- Neither pure nor impure: the Buddha calls it "suchness": therefore the Buddha says this [dharma-realm] is "suchness" — neither pure nor impure. This is called the mark of the dharma-realm's purity.
Pure, empty, without self — the Buddha calls it the supreme self; because the buddhas' self is pure, the Buddha is therefore named the great self.
This verse shows "the mark of the dharma-realm's great self."
- Pure, empty, without self: this untainted realm has "supreme no-self" as its own-nature.
- The Buddha calls it the supreme self: what is called "supreme no-self" is the "pure suchness," and that pure suchness is the own-nature of the buddhas' "self."
- Because the buddhas' self is pure, the Buddha is therefore named the great self: because this "self" of the buddhas most fully attains purity, the Buddha is therefore titled "the great self." By this meaning, the buddhas establish the "supreme self" within the untainted realm. This is called the mark of the dharma-realm's great self.
Neither substance nor non-substance — thus is the buddha-substance spoken of; therefore this thesis is set forth: it is surely an indeterminate matter.
This verse shows "the mark of the dharma-realm's indeterminacy."
- Neither substance: because the two marks of person and dharma cannot be asserted [as a substantial substance].
- Nor non-substance: because the mark of "suchness" truly exists (suchness is not wholly nonexistent).
- Thus is the buddha-substance spoken of: for this reason, the buddha-substance is said to be "neither substance nor non-substance."
- Therefore this thesis is set forth: it is surely an indeterminate matter: what is called "indeterminate" refers to [the four theses]: "after death the Tathāgata exists, after death the Tathāgata does not exist, after death the Tathāgata both exists and does not exist, after death the Tathāgata neither exists nor does not exist" — such four propositions cannot be determinately declared, and therefore the dharma-realm is [said to be] "the mark of indeterminacy."
As when the heat of iron subsides, as when the film upon the eye is removed, so too the subsiding of the mind's cognition — one speaks of it as neither having nor lacking substance.
This verse shows "the mark of the dharma-realm's liberation."
- As when the heat of iron subsides, as when the film upon the eye is removed: of these two things — the iron's heat subsided, the eye's film removed — one may say "neither substance nor non-substance." Why? "Not substance," because the heat and the film are now without mark; "not non-substance," because the mark of subsiding still has substance (the iron remains, the eye remains).
- So too the subsiding of the mind's cognition — one speaks of it as neither having nor lacking substance: the buddhas' mind-cognition takes "greed" as its heat and "ignorance" as its film; when those two subside, this too is said to be "neither substance nor non-substance." Why? "Not substance," because greed and ignorance have subsided; "not non-substance," because the liberation of mind and wisdom still exists. This is called the mark of the dharma-realm's liberation.
Having stated "the profundity of the mark," the text next states "the profundity of the place."
The buddhas' untainted realm is neither one nor many; because it accords with their former bodies, and because it is bodiless, like space.
This verse shows "the profundity of the dharma-realm's place." The buddhas' untainted dharma-realm is "neither one nor many." Why?
- Neither one: because it accords with their former bodies (it differs according to each buddha's body at the causal stage, so it cannot be said to be a single one).
- Neither many: because [its substance] is bodiless. 〔Question〕 How is it "bodiless"? 〔Answer〕 Because it is like space (having no divisible form, so it cannot be said to be many). This is called the profundity of the dharma-realm's place. Having stated "the profundity of the place," the text next states "the profundity of the activity."
As a great jewel-store is the support of the many jewels, so too the pure realm is the basis of the buddha-dharmas.
This verse shows "the supporting activity of the dharma-realm" — because the pure dharma-realm is the support of the jewels of the factors of awakening, such as the [ten] powers and the [four] fearlessnesses.
As dense clouds gather and pour down rain to ripen the hundred grains, so too the pure realm streams forth good and matures sentient beings.
This verse shows "the activity of the dharma-realm in maturing sentient beings" — because from the pure dharma-realm there stream forth the various roots of good that mature sentient beings.
As the sun and moon wax full, their disks clear, bright, and complete, so too the pure realm: the accumulation of the good and pure is complete.
This verse shows "the activity of the dharma-realm in reaching the ultimate." "Accumulation" refers to the two accumulations of merit and wisdom (福智二聚) — because through the pure dharma-realm these two accumulations attain completion.
As the sun's disk rises and streams its light to illumine everything, so too the pure realm streams forth its teaching to transform the host of beings.
This verse shows "the activity of the dharma-realm in proclaiming the true Dharma."
As sunbeams combine to do their common work of illumining the world, so too the pure realm: the buddhas combine to do their common transforming work.
This verse shows "the activity of the dharma-realm in doing its transformative work." Just as many suns and many rays combine at one time to do one work — namely, drying and ripening [the crops] and the like — so too many buddhas and many wisdoms combine at one time to do one work — namely, [their] transformations and the like.
As the sun's light shines both boundlessly and all at once, so too the pure realm and the buddhas' light shine — these two matters are likewise so.
This verse shows "the non-discriminating activity of the dharma-realm." Just as the sun's light shines universally, without any limit and also all at one time, so too the buddhas' light shines universally — boundless and all at once, likewise so.
As the various sunbeams are said to have clouds and the like for their veiling, so too the pure realm and the buddhas' wisdom are said to have the obstruction of sentient beings.
This verse shows "the non-acting [of the activity] of the dharma-realm" (at times it does not give rise to its work). Just as the sunbeams, veiled by clouds and the like, therefore do not shine, so too the buddhas' light, obstructed by the faults of sentient beings — because the five turbidities are many — therefore does not perform its work.
As by the power of the mordant-ash a garment is dyed its various colors, so too the pure realm: by the power of practice and vow, liberation attains its various wisdoms.
This verse shows "the activity of the dharma-realm's liberation-wisdom." Just as, in dyeing a garment, by the power of the "mordant-ash" (滋灰, the mordant that fixes dye) some places take on the various colors and some do not, so too with the pure realm of the three vehicles: by the power of "practice and vow" (行願), the buddhas' liberation attains the various wisdoms while the liberation of the two vehicles does not attain the various wisdoms.
The untainted realm is profound in its three: mark, place, and activity; the buddhas speak of it thus — like dyeing or painting upon space.
This verse again brings out the previous meaning of "profundity."
- The untainted realm is profound in its three: mark, place, and activity: this untainted realm the World-Honored One states in brief to have three [kinds of] profundity — first, profundity of mark; second, profundity of place; third, profundity of activity. The profundity of mark has four kinds: first the mark of purity, second the mark of the great self, third the mark of indeterminacy, fourth the mark of liberation — in that order (shown by the four preceding verses). The profundity of place is one: namely, "neither one nor many, and non-abiding" (shown by the fifth verse). The profundity of activity has eight kinds: first the supporting activity, second the activity of maturing sentient beings, third the activity of reaching the ultimate, fourth the activity of proclaiming the true Dharma, fifth the transformative work, sixth the non-discriminating activity, seventh the wisdom's non-acting, eighth the liberation-wisdom activity — in that order (shown by the latter eight verses).
- The buddhas speak of it thus — like dyeing or painting upon space: this untainted realm is free of conceptual elaboration, and like space it is therefore profound. To expound its profundity thus, distinguishing it [into parts], is like dyeing colors upon space, like painting upon space — this principle should be understood.
Because all [beings and buddhas] are without difference, and because the pure suchness is attained, therefore it is said that all sentient beings are named "the womb of the Tathāgata" (如來藏, tathāgata-garbha).
This verse shows "the dharma-realm is the womb of the Tathāgata."
- Because all are without difference: all sentient beings and all buddhas are equal and without distinction, therefore they are named "suchness" (如).
- Because the pure suchness is attained: the pure "suchness" is attained as one's own-nature, therefore [one is] named "Tathāgata" (如來, the thus-come). By this principle, one may say that all sentient beings are named "the womb of the Tathāgata."
Having stated "the profundity of the untainted realm," the text next states "the buddhas' transformations."
The śrāvakas and the pratyekabuddhas, the bodhisattvas and the Tathāgatas — the first [tier of] transformation outmatches the worldly, and up to the Buddha [each] outmatches the bodhisattva.
This verse shows "the ascending [scale of] transformation." The transformations of all the world, the śrāvaka's transformations can outmatch (surpass and override). The transformations of all śrāvakas, the pratyekabuddha's transformations can outmatch. The transformations of all pratyekabuddhas, the bodhisattva's transformations can outmatch. The transformations of all bodhisattvas, the buddhas' transformations can outmatch. There is no one whose transformations can outmatch the buddhas' transformations — therefore the Tathāgata's transformations are the most surpassingly ascendant.
Thus the buddha's transformations are measureless and inconceivable, manifesting variously according to the being, the world-realm, and the time.
This verse shows "profound transformation." This profundity has two kinds: first, measureless; second, inconceivable. 〔Question〕 How is this matter to be understood? 〔Answer〕 According to what capacity of being, according to what world-realm, according to what season — corresponding to their distinctions, whether much or little — he performs the various transformations. Thus they are both measureless and inconceivable — therefore the Tathāgata's transformations are the most profound. Below, the text next states "the transformations by the distinct turnings" (the transformations arising from the turning of each consciousness distinctly).
Thus, the five faculties being turned, transformation attains its ascendancy: [each] performs all the objects universally, and there are the twelve hundred qualities.
This verse shows "the transformation of the turning of the five faculties." This transformation attains two kinds of ascendancy: first, the attaining of "performing all the objects universally" — namely, each single faculty can use all the objects interchangeably (the eye can serve the ear's function, and so on). Second, the attaining of "the twelve hundred qualities" — namely, each single faculty attains one thousand two hundred qualities.
Thus, the mind-faculty being turned, transformation attains its ascendancy: utterly pure, non-discriminating, ever accompanying the [work of] transformation.
This verse shows "the transformation of the turning of the mind-faculty." The "mind-faculty" refers to the defiled consciousness (染污識, the seventh consciousness, kliṣṭa-manas). By this turning one attains "utterly pure non-conceptual knowledge" (極淨無分別智), which ever runs alongside all transformations and works together with them.
Thus, object and sensation being turned, transformation attains its ascendancy: the pure land is as one wishes, and the objects of enjoyment all appear before one.
This verse shows "the transformation of the turning of object and sensation." "Object" refers to the five sense-fields (五塵, form, sound, scent, taste, touch); "sensation" refers to the five [sense-]consciousnesses. By the turning of these two, the buddha-field is purified, and what one wishes appears before one, to be enjoyed at will.
Thus, discrimination being turned, transformation attains its ascendancy: the works performed by the [various] wisdoms run at all times without hindrance.
This verse shows "the transformation of the turning of discrimination." "Discrimination" refers to the mental consciousness (意識, the sixth consciousness); by this turning, the transformations that are the works performed by the [various] wisdoms are at all times without any obstruction.
Thus, the establishing [of the world] being turned, transformation attains its ascendancy: one abides in the Buddha's unmoving phrase, not abiding in nirvāṇa.
This verse shows "the transformation of the turning of the establishing [of the world]." "The establishing" refers to the receptacle-world (器世界, the physical world); by this turning one abides in the Buddha's "unmoving" untainted dharma-realm, attaining "not entering parinirvāṇa" (not lapsing into [mere] cessation), and ever gives rise to ascendant transformation.
Thus, the defilement of desire being turned, transformation attains its ascendancy: one abides in the Buddha's unsurpassed bliss, and manifests a spouse without defilement.
This verse shows "the transformation of the turning of the defilement of desire." By this turning one attains two kinds of transformation: first, the attaining of abiding in the Buddha's "unsurpassed bliss"; second, the attaining of "being without defilement toward a spouse" (though manifesting the having of a spouse, one is without attachment or defilement).
Thus, the notion of space being turned, transformation attains its ascendancy: whatever one wishes is all attained, and wherever one goes is all unimpeded.
This verse shows "the transformation of the turning of the notion of space." By this turning one attains two kinds of transformation: first, "whatever one wishes is all attained" — because one has attained the "treasury of space" (虛空藏). Second, "wherever one goes is all unimpeded" (the places one goes have no obstruction) — because one has attained the "comprehension of space" (虛空解).
Thus [there is] measureless turning, and thus measureless transformation; the inconceivable works [of the buddhas] all rely on the stainless [realm].
This verse sums up the previous meaning. Because there is measureless "turning," one attains measureless "transformation." Thus the buddhas' inconceivable activity all relies on the untainted dharma-realm — this principle should be understood. Having stated "the buddhas' transformations," the text next states "the buddhas' maturing of sentient beings."
Causing [beings] to amass and to increase, causing to ripen and also to liberate, ripening and ripening without remainder [ceasing], because the worlds are inexhaustible.
This verse shows "the cause of maturing [sentient beings] in sequence." Those who have not yet amassed roots of good, he causes to amass; those who have amassed roots of good, he causes to increase; those whose roots of good have increased, he causes to ripen; those whose roots of good have ripened, he causes to be liberated, so that they attain the utmost purity — thus the buddhas of the ten directions each well proclaim [the Dharma]. "Ripening and ripening again, yet not entering parinirvāṇa" — why? Because the worlds are inexhaustible (sentient beings can never be entirely delivered, so the buddha does not forsake them).
Having attained the hard-to-attain, everywhere he becomes the refuge of beings; [it is] wondrous yet not wondrous, because he has attained the skillful means.
This verse shows "the practice of the already-matured bodhisattva, and its mark of being not [merely] wondrous."
- Having attained the hard-to-attain, everywhere he becomes the refuge of beings: the supreme qualities of unsurpassed awakening, unprecedented, are now fully attained in accord [with him]; and by this accord he can ever be the refuge of beings throughout the world-realms of the ten directions.
- [It is] wondrous yet not wondrous: to mature sentient beings everywhere in this way is "wondrous"; yet this wondrous is also "not wondrous." Why? Because he has attained the skillful means. What is called "the skillful means" is the path that accords with [beings'] capacities — that is, the pure practice.
Turning the wheel of Dharma and the [wheel's] passing; attaining the path and also nirvāṇa — everywhere skillful means arise, [yet] the true dharma-realm is unmoved.
This verse shows "the cause of maturing [sentient beings] universally."
- Turning the wheel of Dharma and the passing [of the Dharma]; attaining the path and also nirvāṇa: within a single instant, in one place he manifests turning the measureless wheel of Dharma, in one place he manifests the extinction of the true Dharma, in one place he manifests attaining great awakening, in one place he manifests entering nirvāṇa — this is because the practices (capacities) of sentient beings each differ.
- Everywhere skillful means arise, [yet] the true dharma-realm is unmoved: if sentient beings are ripe for maturing, the Tathāgata, according to their dwelling-places, teaches everywhere; yet within the untainted dharma-realm he likewise remains unmoved.
Not raising a discriminating mind, he matures [beings of] past, future, and present; everywhere transforming sentient beings, ever manifesting the three gates.
This verse shows "the cause of maturing [sentient beings] naturally."
- Not raising a discriminating mind, he matures [beings of] past, future, and present: none of the buddhas think this thought: "I have matured sentient beings, I shall mature sentient beings, I am now maturing sentient beings." Why? Because of non-discrimination.
- Everywhere transforming sentient beings, ever manifesting the three gates: though without effort, at all times, by means of the various roots of good, he matures sentient beings everywhere throughout the world-realms of the ten directions by means of "the three gates." "The three gates" refers to the teaching-gates of the three vehicles.
As the sun's light, natural, illumines the dark and ripens the hundred grains, so too the light of the dharma-sun: it dispels delusion and ripens sentient beings.
This verse shows the sense of "naturalness" by simile. Just as the sun's disk, without any diligent contrivance, of itself sends forth light, dispelling darkness everywhere and ripening the hundred grains, so too the buddhas: though without effort, by the light of the "dharma-sun" they dispel delusion everywhere and ripen sentient beings.
One lamp kindles a host of lamps — the utmost gathering of brightness is inexhaustible; one ripened [being] transforms many into ripening, and the inexhaustible transforming is likewise so.
This verse shows "the cause of maturing [sentient beings] by succession." Just as one lamp passes its flame to a host of lamps — a supremely great gathering of lamps, measureless and numberless — yet that one lamp['s brightness] is not exhausted, so too the buddhas: one buddha matures [one being], then transforms many into ripening — a supremely great gathering of sentient beings, measureless and numberless — yet the power of that transforming is likewise inexhaustible.
The vast ocean receives the myriad streams, without surfeit and without overflowing; the buddha-realm gathers the host of good, neither filling up nor increasing.
This verse shows "the cause of maturing [sentient beings] without weariness." Just as the vast ocean broadly receives the hundred rivers, without any satiety and without overflowing, because it can hold them, so too the buddha-realm: it ever gathers the measureless pure roots of good, yet does not fill up nor increase, because [its virtue] is wondrous (beyond measure by "filling" or "increasing").
Having stated "the buddhas' maturing of sentient beings," the text next states "the buddhas' purity of the dharma-realm."
The two obstructions already forever removed, the dharma-suchness attains purity; as to the things [known] and the wisdom cognizing them — [there is] mastery and also inexhaustibility.
This verse shows "the sense of the 'nature' of the dharma-realm."
- The two obstructions already forever removed, the dharma-suchness attains purity: this is the "mark of purity" — because both the afflictive obstruction and the cognitive obstruction are forever exhausted.
- As to the things [known] and the wisdom cognizing them — [there is] mastery and also inexhaustibility: this is the "mark of mastery" — because over both "the things" and "the wisdom that takes them as its object," one attains mastery, forever inexhaustible.
The wisdom of suchness in all its modes is the cause that purifies the dharma-realm; benefiting and gladdening, transforming sentient beings — this fruit too is inexhaustible.
This verse shows "the sense of the 'cause' of the dharma-realm."
- The wisdom of suchness in all its modes is the cause that purifies the dharma-realm: in order to purify the dharma-realm, one cultivates at all times "the wisdom of the gate of suchness in all its modes" (一切種如門智) as the cause.
- Benefiting and gladdening, transforming sentient beings — this fruit too is inexhaustible: in order to teach sentient beings, one gives to all sentient beings at all times the two fruits of "benefit and gladness," ever inexhaustible.
Setting in motion body, speech, and mind, the three actions ever transform [beings]; the two gates and the two accumulations — the skillful means are all complete.
This verse shows "the sense of the 'activity' of the dharma-realm."
- Setting in motion body, speech, and mind, the three actions ever transform [beings]: giving rise to the action of body, the action of speech, and the action of mind, one teaches sentient beings at all times.
- The two gates and the two accumulations — the skillful means are all complete: one is fully endowed with "the two gates and the two accumulations" as skillful means. "The two gates" are the gate of samādhi (三昧門) and the gate of dhāraṇī (陀羅尼門); "the two accumulations" are the accumulation of merit (福德聚) and the accumulation of wisdom (智慧聚).
Own-nature and the dharma-repast, and transformation — the distinction of the stations; this is because the dharma-realm is pure — so the buddhas have declared.
This verse shows "the sense of the 'stations' of the dharma-realm."
- Own-nature and the dharma-repast, and transformation — the distinction of the stations: namely, the self-nature body (自性身), the enjoyment body (食身, "the dharma-repast body"), and the emanation body (化身) — this is the distinction of the "stations."
- This is because the dharma-realm is pure — so the buddhas have declared: if the dharma-realm were not pure, these three stations would not be established.
Having stated "the buddhas' purity of the dharma-realm," the text next states "the buddhas' three bodies."
The self-nature body and the enjoyment body, and the emanation body — combined, the three bodies; know that the first body is the support of the other two.
All the buddhas have three kinds of body. First, the self-nature body (自性身; 玄奘系 the dharma-body 法身, svābhāvika-kāya), established by the mark of the transformation of the basis. Second, the enjoyment body (食身; 玄奘系 the enjoyment body 受用身, sāṃbhogika-kāya — the treatise's word "repast" carries the sense of enjoyment/nourishment), established by serving as the "dharma-repast" (nourishing [beings] with the Dharma) within the great assemblies. Third, the emanation body (化身, nairmāṇika-kāya), established by performing the benefit of the sentient beings to be transformed. Herein it should be understood: the self-nature body is the support of the enjoyment body and the emanation body, because it is the root.
The enjoyment body, in the various realms, has distinctions in its enjoyment: the assemblies, lands, names, bodies, and works — all of them differ.
The enjoyment body, in all the world-realms, has these matters of enjoyment — the various retinues, the various buddha-fields, the various names, the various bodies, the various works — all of them are different [from one another].
The equal, subtle body is joined with the enjoyment body; know that the enjoyment body is the cause of the emanation body.
- The equal: refers to the self-nature body — all the buddhas being equal and without distinction.
- The subtle: because this body is hard to know.
- The enjoyment body [joined with the equal body]: the "enjoyment body" is the "repast body"; this body is joined with the equal body (the self-nature body), because it arises in dependence on it.
- Know that the enjoyment body is furthermore the cause of the emanation body: because it manifests everything according to what is to be enjoyed (the emanation body), it is therefore also the cause of the emanation body.
The emanation-buddha [performs] measureless emanations, and is therefore named the emanation body; the two bodies accomplish the two benefits, established in every mode.
Because the "emanation body" — the buddhas — at all times emanate measureless distinctions, the buddha is, by this emanating, named the "emanation body." "The two bodies" are the enjoyment body and the emanation body; "the two benefits" are self-benefit and the benefit of others. The enjoyment body has "the accomplishment of self-benefit" as its mark; the emanation body has "the accomplishment of the benefit of others" as its mark. Thus the two benefits are accomplished in every mode, and accordingly the enjoyment body and the emanation body are established.
Craft-skills and taking birth, attaining the path and parinirvāṇa — displaying these great skillful means, he causes others to attain liberation.
Furthermore, the "emanation body," at all times teaching sentient beings, at times manifests craft-skills, at times manifests taking birth, at times manifests attaining awakening, at times manifests parinirvāṇa — displaying in this way the various great skillful means, all of which cause sentient beings to attain liberation. This is the mark of the accomplishment of the benefit of others.
Know that the buddha's three bodies embrace all buddha-bodies, [for] they are the support of self-benefit and the benefit of others, [and] all three bodies are manifested.
Know that these three bodies embrace all the bodies of all buddhas, because they manifest the support of all self-benefit and benefit of others.
By reason of support, mind, and work, the three buddha[-bodies] are all equal; by own-nature, unbroken[ness], and continuity, the three buddha[-bodies] are all everlasting.
Those three kinds of body, in their respective order, are for all the buddhas entirely equal:
- By reason of "support" (依, the basis), the self-nature body of all buddhas is equal — because the dharma-realm is without distinction.
- By reason of "mind" (心), the enjoyment body of all buddhas is equal — because the buddha-mind is without distinction.
- By reason of "work" (業), the emanation body of all buddhas is equal — because their work is one and the same.
Furthermore, all the buddhas are likewise "everlasting" (常住):
- By reason of "essential constancy" (自性常, essential constancy), the self-nature body of all buddhas is everlasting — because it is ultimately untainted.
- By reason of "unbroken constancy" (無間常, unbroken constancy), the enjoyment body of all buddhas is everlasting — because the teaching of the Dharma is without interruption.
- By reason of "continuous constancy" (相續常, continuous constancy), the emanation body of all buddhas is everlasting — because though it ceases here, it appears again there.
Having stated "the buddhas' bodies," the text next states "the buddhas' wisdoms."
The four wisdoms: the mirror is unmoving, the support of the [other] three wisdoms; the eighth, seventh, sixth, and fifth [group of] consciousnesses — because they are turned in sequence.
- The four wisdoms: the mirror is unmoving, the support of the [other] three wisdoms: all the buddhas have four kinds of wisdom — first, mirror wisdom (鏡智; 大圓鏡智 the great perfect mirror wisdom, ādarśa-jñāna); second, equality wisdom (平等智; 平等性智, samatā-jñāna); third, observing wisdom (觀智; 妙觀察智, pratyavekṣaṇā-jñāna); fourth, accomplishing wisdom (作事智; 成所作智, kṛtya-anuṣṭhāna-jñāna). That mirror wisdom has "the unmoving" as its mark, and ever serves as the support of the other three wisdoms. Why? Because the [other] three wisdoms are "moving."
- The eighth, seventh, sixth, and fifth [group of] consciousnesses — because they are turned in sequence: turning the eighth consciousness (the store consciousness, 阿賴耶識) one attains mirror wisdom; turning the seventh consciousness (manas, the deliberating mind) one attains equality wisdom; turning the sixth consciousness (the mental consciousness) one attains observing wisdom; turning the first five consciousnesses (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body) one attains accomplishing wisdom — this principle should be understood.
Mirror wisdom takes its objects without partition, its continuity ever unbroken; not confused about all that is cognized, [yet] the various marks do not appear before it.
This verse shows "the turning of the eighth consciousness to attain mirror wisdom."
- Mirror wisdom takes its objects without partition: when it takes all objects [as its field], it does not take them in segments (it does not cut the object into pieces).
- Its continuity ever unbroken: at all times it runs on constantly, never interrupted.
- Not confused about all that is cognized: it fully knows all objects, its obstruction forever exhausted (it has no confusion about what is cognized).
- [Yet] the various marks do not appear before it: when it takes objects [as its field], it is apart from the taking-up of [coarse] mental images, without discrimination.
Mirror wisdom is the cause of [all] the wisdoms; it is called the great treasury of wisdom; the other bodies and the other wisdoms — their images arise from this.
This verse shows "the function of mirror wisdom."
- Mirror wisdom is the cause of the wisdoms; it is called the great treasury of wisdom: those wisdoms — equality wisdom and the rest — in every mode have mirror wisdom for their cause, and therefore this wisdom is like a "great treasury," because it is the treasury of [all] the wisdoms.
- The other bodies and the other wisdoms — their images arise from this: "the other bodies" refers to the enjoyment body and so on; "the other wisdoms" refers to equality wisdom and so on. The images of those bodies and the images of those wisdoms all arise from this wisdom, and therefore the Buddha calls this wisdom "mirror wisdom" (mirroring forth images).
The wisdom of equality with sentient beings — cultivated to purity, it realizes awakening; not abiding in nirvāṇa, because there is no final end.
This verse shows "the turning of the seventh consciousness to attain equality wisdom."
- The wisdom of equality with sentient beings — cultivated to purity, it realizes awakening: when the bodhisattvas realize the dharma present before them, they attain the "wisdom of equality with all sentient beings"; and when they cultivate this wisdom to the utmost purity, they attain unsurpassed awakening.
- Not abiding in nirvāṇa, because there is no final end: because sentient beings are inexhaustible there is no final end, and because there is no final end one does not abide in nirvāṇa. By this meaning, it is called "equality wisdom."
Great loving-kindness and great compassion — these two are ever unbroken; if sentient beings have faith, the buddha-image appears at once before them.
This verse shows "the function of equality wisdom."
- Great loving-kindness and great compassion — these two are ever unbroken: the buddhas, the Tathāgatas, at all times attend upon sentient beings. Why? Because great loving-kindness and great compassion are without interruption.
- If sentient beings have faith, the buddha-image appears at once before them: according to what they have faith in, it appears in accordance with them — and so some sentient beings see the Tathāgata as blue in color, some see the Tathāgata as yellow, and so with all [colors]. These first two wisdoms, mirror wisdom and equality wisdom, are the dharma-body.
Observing wisdom, [as to] cognition and the cognized, is at all times without hindrance; this wisdom is like a great treasury, the support of the retentions and the concentrations.
This verse shows "the turning of the sixth consciousness to attain observing wisdom." Observing wisdom, toward all the objects that are cognized, is ever without obstruction, and is like a great treasury — the support of all the "gates of dhāraṇī" (the retentions) and all the "gates of samādhi" (the concentrations). Why? Because these two gates both arise from this wisdom.
Ever within the great assemblies, it manifests all manner of things, able to cut through the nets of doubt, for it rains down the great rain of Dharma.
This verse shows "the function of observing wisdom," its meaning being as the verse states (observing wisdom, ever within the great assemblies, manifests all manner of things, is able to cut through sentient beings' nets of doubt, and rains down the great rain of Dharma). This observing wisdom is the enjoyment body.
The wisdom of accomplishment, in the various realms, gives rise to all manner of transforming works, measureless and inconceivable, for the sake of benefiting the host of beings.
This verse shows "the turning of the first five consciousnesses to attain accomplishing wisdom." That accomplishing wisdom, in all the world-realms, performs all manner of transforming works, measureless and boundless, inconceivable. Works such as these are all for the sake of benefiting all sentient beings. This accomplishing wisdom is the emanation body.
Retentive holding, and the equal mind, the opening of Dharma and also the doing of works — thus, in dependence on the four senses, the four wisdoms arise in sequence.
- Retentive holding: refers to the retentive holding of what is heard [of the Dharma].
- The equal mind: refers to attaining "the equality of self and other" toward all sentient beings.
- The opening of Dharma: refers to expounding the true Dharma.
- The doing of works: refers to giving rise to all manner of transforming deeds. In dependence on the first sense, mirror wisdom arises; in dependence on the second sense, equality wisdom arises; in dependence on the third sense, observing wisdom arises; in dependence on the fourth sense, accomplishing wisdom arises.
Distinctness of nature and non-vanity, all-ness and beginninglessness — because [buddhas] are without distinction, [they are] not one; because they share one support, [they are] not many.
This verse shows that "the buddhas are neither one nor many." Not one — by reason of the five senses of "distinctness of nature, non-vanity, all-ness, beginninglessness, and without-distinction":
- Distinctness of nature: because the natures of the boundless buddhas are each distinct. If one said there is only a single buddha, and yet there are those "who will attain awakening" (bodhisattvas about to become buddhas), this would not hold — therefore buddhas are "not one."
- Non-vanity: if the accumulations of merit and wisdom were vain (without real effect), then the other bodhisattvas ought not to attain awakening; since the two accumulations are not vain, [the "single buddha" thesis] does not hold — therefore buddhas are "not one."
- All-ness: if one said there is only a single buddha, then this buddha could not benefit all sentient beings; because the Buddha establishes all sentient beings in becoming buddhas, [the "single buddha" thesis] does not hold — therefore buddhas are "not one."
- Beginninglessness: if one said there is only a single first buddha, then this buddha ought to have become a buddha without the two accumulations of merit and wisdom, which does not hold — therefore buddhas are "not one."
- Without-distinction: if one said there is some other buddha [who became a buddha] without the two accumulations of merit and wisdom, this does not hold — therefore buddhas are "not one." Not many — by reason of "sharing one support": the dharma-body of all buddhas relies on the untainted realm (one and the same support, so not many). Having stated "the buddhas' wisdoms," the text next states "the skillful means for entering buddhahood."
If discrimination is ever-existent, then the real is forever non-existent; if discrimination is forever non-existent, then the real is ever-existent.
If the own-nature of "discrimination" (分別性, the wholly-imagined nature) were ever-existent, then the own-nature of "the real" (真實性, the true nature) would be forever non-existent, because [the real] could not be found. If the own-nature of "discrimination" is forever non-existent, then the own-nature of "the real" is ever-existent, because [the real] can be found.
Wishing to cultivate the supreme cultivation, one sees no cultivation at all; wishing to attain the supreme attainment, one sees no attainment at all.
That "supreme cultivation" is such that that cultivation cannot be found (only when no mark of cultivation is seen is it the supreme cultivation). That "supreme attainment" is such that that attainment cannot be found (only when no mark of attainment is seen is it the supreme attainment).
With reverence and over long time, one contemplates the Buddha's unprecedented dharmas; relying on this to "swiftly become a buddha" [in fact] takes one far from the Buddha's awakening.
If there is a bodhisattva who, toward the Buddha, the World-Honored One, gives rise to utmost reverence, and over a long time diligently contemplates the Buddha's unprecedented dharmas, and — relying on this contemplating mind and long-time diligence — supposes "I shall swiftly attain unsurpassed awakening," know that such a bodhisattva is in fact very far from the Buddha's awakening. Why? Because he has conceit (慢, the conceit of a self).
Contemplating that dharmas are mere discrimination — this meaning is as known before — the bodhisattva who is without discrimination is said to swiftly become a buddha.
If the bodhisattva contemplates all dharmas as mere discrimination (the meaning as known before), and contemplates that that discrimination too is without discrimination, he then attains entry into "the station of the acceptance of the non-arising [of dharmas]" (無生忍位). By this meaning, he is said to attain awakening. Having stated "the skillful means for entering buddhahood," the text next states "the buddhas' shared work" (the buddhas' one and the same substance and function).
Know that the waters of the various rivers each have a separate support and a separate work; the water being little, the [water-]creatures' use is little, because they have not yet entered the great ocean. All entering the great ocean, [they have] one support and one work; the water being great, the creatures' use is great, and it is likewise ever inexhaustible. So too the various separate understandings [of the bodhisattvas] each have a separate intent and a separate work; the understanding being little, the benefit is little, because they have not yet entered the buddha-substance. All entering the buddha-substance, [they have] one understanding and one intent; the understanding being great, the benefit is great, and the utmost gathering is likewise inexhaustible.
- The "separate waters" are a simile for the bodhisattvas' "separate understandings"; the "separate supports" are a simile for the bodhisattvas' "separate intents"; the "one water" is a simile for the Tathāgatas' "one understanding"; the "one support" is a simile for the Tathāgatas' "one intent."
- Because the waters of the various rivers are separate, the works of the waters are also separate; because the water is little, the enjoyment of the creatures in the water is also little. Why? Because they have not yet entered the great ocean together. The bodhisattvas are likewise: because their understanding is separate, their works are also separate; because their understanding is little, their benefiting of sentient beings is also little. Why? Because they have not yet entered the buddha-substance together.
- If the various waters enter the great ocean, they share one support and one substance; because the water becomes one, the works also become one; because the water is great, the water-creatures' enjoyment is also great. If the bodhisattvas enter the buddha-substance together, they share one intent and one understanding; because the understanding becomes one, the works also become one; because the understanding is great, the benefit is also great, so as to reach, exhaustively, the whole gathering of all sentient beings, likewise inexhaustible.
Having thus stated "the buddhas' substance and function," the text next speaks one verse to exhort [beings] to press on and aspire [to awakening].
The incomparable, complete white dharmas, the cause of the benefit and gladness of beings, the blissful abiding, the inexhaustible treasury — the wise should seek to arouse it.
- The incomparable, complete white dharmas: by reason of the Buddha's "accomplishment of self-benefit."
- The cause of the benefit and gladness of beings: by reason of the Buddha's "accomplishment of benefiting others."
- The blissful abiding, the inexhaustible treasury: because the Buddha's roots of good are without fault and unsurpassed, an "inexhaustible treasury of bliss."
- The wise should seek to arouse it: the person of wisdom should, in order to attain this most excellent "blissful abiding," arouse the great mind of awakening.
The chapter on Awakening is complete.
菩提品,是《大乘莊嚴經論》的「眼」——李百藥的譯經序裡,獨獨點出這一品「最為微妙」,說它「轉八識以成四智、束四智以具三身,詳諸經論所未曾有」。但這『轉識成智、四智三身』只是全品最亮的一顆眼珠;整品依次說佛果的因、身、智、事業與無漏法界,最後勸人發心去求。本篇循其主要次第,一段一段講開。
它與真實品恰成一對:真實品講修證的路(五位,終於「轉依」);菩提品講修證的果(轉依圓滿,便是這裡的智、身、業、界)。路走到底,結的就是這一整樹的果。
先把貫串全品的一把鑰匙交代清楚,就是「八識」與「轉依」。唯識把心識分成八個:前五識(眼、耳、鼻、舌、身,對五塵作了別)、第六意識(分別、思量)、第七末那識(恆審思量、執第八為「我」的染污識)、第八阿賴耶識(含藏種子的根本識)。本品後文依「八七六五識,次第轉得」把四組識配於四智;這一配對是全品的重要線索,但本頌沒有明判轉前轉後是否同一識體,也沒有在此句建立雜染八識必不斷滅的命題。本疏因此只循「轉得」的次第說明佛果的智、身、界與業,不另加當體同一之判。
一、一切種智:成佛的「因」與「果」都已圓滿
釋文說:前面講完了「菩薩成熟眾生」,接著要說「菩薩得一切種智」——也就是佛果的那個無所不知的智。
開頭先問一句:一個人要走到「成佛」,到底得備齊什麼?第一頌答的是「因」這一面:
一切難已行, 一切善已集, 一切時已度, 一切障已斷。
「一切種智」的因圓滿,就是這四個「一切」都做盡了:一切難已行——無量百千種難行的事都行過了,未曾疲倦;一切善已集——以六波羅蜜為自性的善根都聚齊了;一切時已度——長劫長時都歷盡了(不是一生兩生的事);一切障已斷——連諸地上最細的微細障都斷盡了。要體會這四句的份量:成佛不是一念頓得的便宜,是難行、善根、長時、斷障,樣樣修到「一切」二字,因地才算圓。
因圓了,「果」是什麼樣?第二頌答:
成就一切種, 此即為佛身, 譬如大篋開, 眾寶無不現。
釋文從三層說這個果:至得(從此以後,成就了一切種智)、自性(這一切種智,當體就是佛的身體)、譬喻——這譬喻最堪玩味:佛果好比一只大寶箱忽然打開,裡頭的眾寶一時全現眼前。為什麼用『箱開眾寶』?因為『不可思議的菩提分之寶』——力、無畏、不共法那一切功德——不是一件一件慢慢添上去的,而是因地圓滿的那一刻,箱蓋一掀,萬德齊現。修因如積寶入篋,證果如開篋現珍:所積的,正是當下所現的。
到這裡,釋文點出全品的第一個樞紐:這「一切種智」就是「佛身」。下文便接著問:這個「身」,是「有」還是「無」?
二、佛身無二相:說它「有」也不是,說它「無」也不是
白法為佛身, 非無亦非有, 佛為法寶因, 法則善根因。
既說一切種智即是佛身,那這佛身是「白法」(六波羅蜜等一切清淨善法)轉成的本體。可一旦要問它是「有」是「無」,釋文立刻撥正:非無亦非有。說它『不是無』,因為它與真如無別(真如非斷滅);說它『不是有』,因為它沒有可成立的實自性。這就叫「無二相」——不落「有」「無」兩邊。為什麼緊接著佛身就要立這「無二」?因為一執佛身為實「有」,便墮增益;一執為斷「無」,便墮損減——佛身正是離這兩邊的中道體。
後二句把佛身的『生發力』帶出:佛為法寶因(佛宣說一切法、又以神通力顯發,所以佛是「法寶」之因)、法則善根因(法又是眾生「善根」之因)。釋文打了個田稼的比方:以眾生為田、善根為穀——法寶落在眾生這片田裡,便長出善根之穀。一條生長的鏈子:佛生法、法生善根。
下一頌「重顯前義」,把這條鏈子收成兩個更鮮明的像:
具法亦離法, 如藏亦如雲, 生法雨法雨, 故成如是譬。
具法亦離法:諸佛具足一切善法、又遠離一切不善法——一具一離,德便圓。要緊的是後一句的雙喻:佛寶如「大藏」、法寶如「大雲」。為什麼這樣配?釋文自答:取『生法、雨法』之義——佛寶能出生法寶,正像大寶藏能出生眾寶(藏是「出生」的源);法寶能滋長眾生善根,正像大雲降雨能滋長百穀(雲是『潤生』的施)。一個是藏(萬寶所從出),一個是雲(甘霖遍灑而萬物自長):佛與法之於眾生善根,正是這樣一源一潤。
三、無上歸依:佛為什麼是眾生『最後可歸投』的那一處
佛身既明,下面問一個更切身的:眾生在生死苦海裡,到底有沒有一個靠得住、靠到底的歸投處?這一大段就講「無上歸依」——先略說、再廣說,再點出它「勝」在哪、「大」在哪。
諸佛常救護, 眾生三染污, 諸惑諸惡行, 及以生老死。
略說「救護」:諸佛畢竟救護(救到底、不中途撒手)。救護什麼?眾生的三種染污——煩惱染污(諸惑,貪瞋癡那一類)、業染污(諸惡行,造作的惡業)、生染污(生老死,輪迴本身)。注意這三層是有次第的:惑起業、業招生——從根上的煩惱,到所造的業,到所受的苦果,整條輪迴鏈,佛都「一切時救護不捨」。這「不捨」二字,就是「畢竟」的意思。
諸災及惡趣, 身見亦小乘, 如是諸眾生, 一切皆救護。
廣說「救護」,把所救的眾生鋪開來看,一類一類都不漏:諸災——盲、聾、瘂、狂、亂、形殘的眾生,由佛力故,盲得見、聾得聽、瘂能言、狂得正、亂得定、殘得全;惡趣——地獄等眾生,佛放光照觸,令離苦不再墮;身見——執著有「我」的眾生,令悟「人無我」而入二乘涅槃;小乘——二乘種性不定的,以方便引他迴入大乘。從身根殘缺的、到墮惡趣的、到執我的、到滯小的,四類盡攝:可見「救護」不是只救一種人,是上下深淺一切眾生都在這張網裡。
佛為勝歸處, 無比故無上, 如前種種畏, 無不令脫者。
歸依「勝」在哪?——無比,故無上。佛無可與之相比,所以是「無上」的歸處;正因無上,前面所說的三染污、諸災等一切怖畏,沒有一樣不能令眾生解脫。這裡藏著「歸依」的真義:你歸投的對象越是究竟無上,你被救拔的底線就越深——歸於無上者,才有「無不令脫」的保證。
諸佛善滿身, 一切世間勝, 妙法化眾生, 以度悲海故。
歸依勝的「因」——佛憑什麼能當這無上歸處?憑兩樣:一是自利究竟(諸佛善滿身、一切世間勝——力、無畏等功德為自性而圓滿,自己先到了岸);二是利他究竟(妙法化眾生、度悲海——善解教化的方便,且度盡了「大悲海」的彼岸)。自己未到岸的人救不了人;佛是自利圓、悲願更圓,所以堪作歸依。
盡於未來際, 普及一切生, 恒時利益彼, 是說歸依大。
歸依「大」在哪?三義:時大(窮盡一切眾生的生死邊際,救到未來際)、境大(以一切眾生為所緣,一個不揀)、事大(一切時作利益、救苦、令出離)。時間上無盡、對象上無遺、事業上無歇——「大」在這三無上。一句話收住這一段:佛之為歸依,勝(無上)、因(自他二利究竟)、大(時境事三無盡),所以是眾生最後、最穩、最徹底的歸投處。
四、如來轉依相:佛果的根,是凡夫「所依」的整個翻轉
這一大段是全品的脊梁——講「轉依」。前面說佛身、說歸依,都好;可這一切的根在哪?根在「轉依」:把雜染的「所依」翻成清淨。先問:這一「轉」,到底翻掉了什麼、得著了什麼?
二障種恒隨, 彼滅極廣斷, 白法圓滿故, 依轉二道成。
轉依有「離」也有「得」。離的一面(所治遠離):煩惱障、智障兩種種子,無始以來恒常隨逐著我們,如今「極廣斷」——「極」是一切地、「廣」是一切種,連最深最細的種子都永滅。得的一面(能治成就):佛體與最上圓滿的白法相應,那一刻「依」一轉,便成就二道——一是「極清淨出世智道」(照真)、二是「無邊所識境界智道」(照俗)。這就叫「轉依」:斷二障種子(離),得二智道(得),同一翻轉的兩面。
彼處如來住, 不動如山王, 尚悲樂滅人, 況著諸有者。
這一轉,在一切「轉」當中為什麼最殊勝?因為如來轉依後安住的那個「無漏界」,是「不動如山王」——像群山之王鎮在大地上,安住不搖。為什麼借「山王」?要顯那份安住不動、不再退轉的份量:凡夫的心隨境流轉,二乘的證還可動;唯佛這一轉,如山王鎮地,永不退墮。而且這不動裡含著大悲:佛這樣安住了,回頭看那些「樂寂滅」的聲聞緣覺,尚且生憐愍(歎他們只求自了);何況那些遠在下劣、執「有」受苦的眾生?——不動而不冷,安住而悲心更切,這才是佛的『轉依勝』。
他利及無上, 不轉及不生, 廣大與無二, 無住亦平等, 殊勝與遍授, 是說如來轉, 顯示十功德, 差別義應知。
這兩頌把「如來轉」的好處列成十種功德,不妨一條條認:①他義轉(轉了是為利他)、②無上轉(於一切法得自在,過二乘)、③不轉轉(染污諸因再也轉不動這「依」了)、④不生轉(一切染污法畢竟不起)、⑤廣大轉(能示現大菩提及般涅槃)、⑥無二轉(生死涅槃無二)、⑦不住轉(有為無為俱不住)、⑧平等轉(與二乘同解脫煩惱障)、⑨殊勝轉(力無畏等佛法無與等)、⑩遍授轉(恒以一切乘教授眾生)。十條看似零散,其實一線串起:這一「轉」,對下能利他、能遍授(悲),對上能自在、能殊勝(智),對自己能不退、不生(穩),對生死涅槃能無二、不住(中道)——智、悲、穩、中,佛德的綱目都在這一轉裡。
轉依既明,釋文接著用三個鮮明的譬喻,把『轉依後的佛體』與眾生的關係講透——遍不遍?見不見?出沒如何?
如空遍一切, 佛亦一切遍; 虛空遍諸色, 諸佛遍眾生。
先說「遍」:佛體像虛空——虛空遍在一切色法之中,頌文則說諸佛遍於眾生。有人要問:眾生現在明明不是佛,怎能說佛體「遍」眾生?釋文答「未成就故」:眾生尚未成就佛果。本疏依此傳述,不把「未成就」擴作佛性已具而暫被遮蔽的判語。
譬如水器壞, 月像不現前; 如是眾生過, 佛像亦不現。
可既然佛體遍一切,為什麼眾生看不見佛?——這就要第二喻:水器與月影。天上月本來一直在,可若盛水的器皿破了、水漏了,水面就映不出月影——不是月不在,是承月的器壞了。同樣,佛像本來遍照,只因眾生的過失(業障),如同破漏的水器,映不出那本來就在的佛。看不見,過在眾生的器,不在佛的月。這一喻最能解眾生的疑:佛不曾不在,是我這盆水濁了、漏了。
譬如火聚性, 或然或滅盡; 如是諸佛化, 或出或涅槃。
第三喻說『出沒』:頌文把諸佛的「出」與「涅槃」,比作一聚火的「然」與「滅」。此喻所比的是諸佛化現的出世、入涅槃;本疏不由火聚滅盡另推出『火性仍在』或其他常住實體的結論。
五、如來事業恒無功用:佛度生,卻不費一念造作
承上,佛既如火之或出或沒,那佛做這一切事業,是不是很『用力』、很『刻意』?這一段答:不。佛的事業是「無功用」的——不假造作,自然而成。
意珠及天鼓, 自然成自事; 佛化及佛說, 無思亦如是。
兩個極好的譬喻並出:如意寶珠雖然無心,卻能自然變現種種(隨人所求,珠自應之);天鼓雖然無心,卻能自然出種種妙音。佛也這樣——佛現種種變化(佛化),像意珠之變現,無心而現;佛說種種妙法(佛說),像天鼓之鳴響,無思而說。要體會這「無功用」的妙:凡夫做事要起念、要使力,佛度生卻如珠之映物、鼓之自鳴,不待起心動念,任運而成。越是究竟,越不費力。
依空業無間, 而業有增減; 依界事不斷, 而事有生滅。
再從「依空」一喻說佛事的「無間」與「生滅」並行不悖:世間萬事依著虛空而作,虛空從不斷絕(所以世間事「無間」),可世間事本身卻有增有減。佛也一樣——依「無漏界」而作佛事,那作佛事的「依」(無漏界)無有斷絕(所以佛事「無間」),而所現的佛事相,卻可有出有沒、有生有滅。一句話:佛事的「體」(所依的無漏界)恒常無間,佛事的「相」(隨機示現)卻有起有伏——如空恒在而世事有增減。
六、無漏法界甚深:佛所安住的那個「界」,深在何處
到這裡,全品轉入最深的一段。佛的身、業都明了,可佛究竟安住在一個什麼樣的「處」?——無漏法界。這個界「甚深」,釋文從三個面剖開:相甚深(它是什麼樣的)、處甚深(它是一是多)、業甚深(它起什麼用)。
相甚深之一——清淨相:它本來就乾淨,不是後來才洗淨的
如前後亦爾, 及離一切障, 非淨非不淨, 佛說名為如。
法界的清淨,妙在「非淨非不淨」。說它「非淨」——因為它自性本來不染(「如前後亦爾」:它前後一如,本自清淨,不是後來才被漂白的,所以不能說它是被『淨化』出來的「淨」);說它「非不淨」——因為後來的客塵已離(障既已除,也不能說它『髒』)。本自潔淨故不待淨、客塵可離故不名垢:這就是法界的「清淨相」。
這『本淨而為客塵所染、染而本淨不失』的弔詭,《究竟一乘寶性論》以虛空作喻最為分明:「如虛空淨心,常明無轉變,為虛妄分別,客塵煩惱染」——心如虛空,本來常明、不曾轉變,只是被妄分別的「客塵」蒙著。又說:「譬如虛空中,離垢淨日月,為彼厚密雲,羅網之所覆」——日月本自清淨,被厚雲羅網覆著,雲一去,「日無雲翳等,無垢功德具,顯現即彼體」。要體會這喻的兩面:說「非不淨」,因為雲翳(客塵)實實在在覆著,可開可離,不是無事;說「非淨」,因為虛空、日月之淨乃本有,開雲只是顯它本明,不是替它添一分淨。客塵是『客』、是覆而非染體,本淨是『主』、是顯而非新得——「非淨非不淨」,就落在這虛空與雲翳的分際上。
相甚深之二——大我相:無我之中,有個「大我」
清淨空無我, 佛說第一我; 諸佛我淨故, 故佛名大我。
這一頌最易生誤會,須細認。佛法明明說「無我」,怎麼又冒出個「大我」?關鍵在:這無漏界以「第一無我」為自性——所謂「第一無我」,就是那「清淨如」(徹底空掉妄執之我後所顯的真如);而這清淨如,正是諸佛之「我」的自性。因為佛這個「我」最得清淨(無一毫妄執),所以稱「大我」。要分清:凡夫的「我」是妄執出來的小我;佛的「大我」恰恰是把妄我空盡後所顯的清淨真如。空掉妄我,才見大我——不是無我之外另立一我,是無我到底,當體即名大我。
此處只取一個現成的像,幫初學者跨過『空了又立』這道坎〔此喻借自他經,但助開解,非謂本論引之〕:《圓覺經》說眼有翳時,妄見虛空裡有花,「如眾空花滅於虛空,不可說言有定滅處,何以故?無生處故」——所謂「空花」,本是翳眼妄見,空裡原無此花。翳除花亡,並不是另外得了一朵『真花』,只是還虛空一個本來無花的清淨。妄我之亡,亦復如是:空掉妄執之我,不是在無我之外又安一個「大我」當作新得的東西;妄我本如空花無生,亡時只還那本來清淨的真如一個本然——這本然,就名「大我」。先有此像墊著,『無我中說大我』便不致聽成『先說沒有、又偷偷立一個有』。
相甚深之三——無記相:佛體『是有是無』,不可定答
非體非非體, 如是說佛體; 是故作是論, 定是無記法。
佛體,說它『有(體)』也不是、說它『無(非體)』也不是。非體——因為人、法二相不可說(無實體相可指);非非體——因為「如」相實有(真如非全無)。正因如此,『佛死後是有、是無、亦有亦無、非有非無』這四句,都「不可記」(不能定答)——這就是法界的「無記相」。為什麼不可記?因為一旦定答「有」或「無」,就把離兩邊的真如拖回有無的計度裡了。佛在此處的『不答』,不是不知,是那真實本不落這四句。
相甚深之四——解脫相:像鐵的熱退了、眼的翳除了
譬如鐵熱息, 譬如眼瞖除, 心智息亦爾, 不說有無體。
解脫是什麼相?兩個身邊的譬喻:燒紅的鐵,熱退了;害翳的眼,翳除了。這兩件,可說「非體非非體」——「非體」,因為熱與翳已無相(那要除的東西沒了);「非非體」,因為鐵還在、眼還在(止息之相仍有體)。佛的心智解脫也這樣:以「貪」為熱、以「無明」為翳,二者一息——「非體」(貪與無明已息)、「非非體」(心慧的解脫仍有)。妙在這一喻:解脫不是把心智整個滅掉(鐵眼還在),是把熱與翳(貪與無明)退去——去病不去身。
處甚深——這個界,是一還是多
諸佛無漏界, 非一亦非多, 前身隨順故, 非身如空故。
無漏法界,『非一、亦非多』。非一——因為『隨順前身』(隨各佛因地之身而有別,不可說死板一個);非多——因為其體「非身」,如同虛空(虛空無形質可割裂,故不可說多)。又借虛空:虛空你說它一塊嗎?它遍一切;你說它多塊嗎?它無界可分。法界之『非一非多』,正如虛空之不可數。
業甚深——清淨法界起的八種大用:八個「日」的譬喻
下面一連八頌,釋文用一串日喻,把無漏法界所起的八種業(作用)一一畫出。同是一個「淨界」,起用卻有八樣,妙在這八喻多半繞著『藏、雲、日』打轉,層層遞進:
譬如大寶藏, 眾寶之所依; 淨界亦如是, 佛法之依止。
①依止業:淨界像大寶藏,是力、無畏等一切菩提分寶的所依——萬德有處安身。
譬如密雲布, 灑雨成百穀; 淨界亦如是, 流善熟眾生。
②成熟眾生業:淨界像密雲降雨、潤成百穀,從淨界流出善根、成熟眾生——德如雨,眾生如苗。
譬如日月盈, 皎淨輪圓滿; 淨界亦如是, 善淨聚圓滿。
③到究竟業:淨界像滿月之輪,皎潔圓滿,使福、智二聚得以圓滿——德如月圓,無一分虧欠。
譬如日輪出, 流光照一切; 淨界亦如是, 流說化群生。
④說正法業:淨界像日輪一出、流光普照,從淨界流出正法、教化群生——法如日光,所照無遺。
譬如日光合, 同事照世間; 淨界亦如是, 佛合同業化。
⑤化所作業:像眾多日光一時和合、同作一事(令物乾、令物熟),眾多佛、眾多智也一時和合、同作一業(變化等)——多佛同事,如多日合明。
譬如日光照, 無限亦一時; 淨界佛光照, 二事亦如是。
⑥無分別業:像日光普照,無有分限、又是一時(不揀貴賤、不分先後,同時遍照),佛光普照也這樣無限一時——無分別,如日之不揀物。
譬如諸日光, 說有雲等翳; 淨界諸佛智, 說有眾生障。
⑦不作業(有時不起所作):像日光被雲翳遮著就照不到,佛光也被眾生過失(五濁)所障,所以有時不有所作——不是日無光,是雲遮;不是佛不化,是障厚。這一喻與前面『水器壞、月不現』同一機杼:過在眾生這邊。
譬如滋灰力, 染衣種種色; 淨界行願力, 解脫種種智。
⑧解脫智業:換一個染坊的譬喻——染衣靠「滋灰」(媒染劑)之力,有的地方能上種種色、有的地方上不了。三乘的淨界也這樣:諸佛靠「行願」之力,解脫中得種種智;二乘的解脫卻得不到這種種智。同是「淨界」,因行願力的深淺,所成的智便有「種種」與『不種種』之別——如同染坊,有灰處色備、無灰處色缺。
無漏界甚深, 相處業三種, 諸佛如是說, 譬如染畫空。
這一頌「重顯」前義,把上面總收:無漏界的甚深,就是相(清淨、大我、無記、解脫四相)、處(一多不住)、業(上述八業)這三類。最後一個總喻最妙:譬如染畫空——這無漏界沒有戲論,像虛空一樣;而我們這樣分門別類地去『說它甚深』,就好比在虛空上染色、在虛空上作畫。虛空哪裡染得上、畫得上?——可知一切言說分別,於這無漏界都只是「畫空」,說而無所說。這一喻,把前面所有的『相、處、業』分別,輕輕一收:都是畫空之筆。
一切無別故, 得如清淨故, 故說諸眾生, 名為如來藏。
這一段最後說:諸眾生,名為「如來藏」。釋文依頌中兩句解名:由「一切無別」而說「如」,由「得如清淨」而說「如來」,故以如來藏稱諸眾生。本疏只報此頌的名義與論證範圍;它沒有在此建立『每一位讀者已具足圓滿佛果』的命題,也沒有裁決一種性、五種性的爭議,更不把真如平等另判為佛與眾生同一實體。
七、諸佛變化:佛的『化現』有多廣、多深、怎麼來的
無漏界既明,佛從這界裡起的第一樣大用,就是「變化」(化身示現)。這一段先說化之「增上」(最勝)、化之「甚深」,再細數八種「別轉變化」——也就是逐一轉某識某根而得的化用,最後總結。
聲聞及緣覺, 菩薩與如來, 初化退世間, 至佛退菩薩。
先顯「增上變化」(佛化最勝):變化有個由低到高的次第——世間的變化,聲聞的變化能勝過它(退,即覆退、勝伏);聲聞的,緣覺能勝;緣覺的,菩薩能勝;菩薩的,諸佛能勝。而沒有任何一人的變化能勝過諸佛的變化——所以如來的化,登峰造極。一級壓一級,到佛為止,可見佛化之「增上」。
如是佛變化, 無量不思議, 隨人隨世界, 隨時種種現。
再顯「甚深變化」:佛化甚深,深在兩字——無量、不思議。隨什麼根器的人、隨什麼世界、隨什麼時節,照其差別,或多或少,種種而現。為什麼「不思議」?因為它不是一個固定模子套出來的,是對機而現、千變萬化——這才接得上下面『八別轉』:佛化的無量,正由八樣根識的轉而開出。
下面八頌,逐一講「別轉變化」——轉某一根、某一識,便得某一種增上的化用:
如是五根轉, 變化得增上, 諸義遍所作, 功德千二百。
轉五根(眼耳鼻舌身):得二種增上——「諸義遍所作」(一一根都能互用一切境界,眼能作耳之用等,根根互通)、「功德千二百」(一一根各得一千二百種功德)。凡夫的根各管各的、彼此隔礙;佛轉了,根根互用無礙。
如是意根轉, 變化得增上, 極淨無分別, 恒隨變化行。
轉意根(此指染污識,即第七末那):得『極清淨的無分別智』,恒與一切變化隨行共作。最染的我執之根,一轉,成了最淨的無分別智。
如是義受轉, 變化得增上, 淨土如所欲, 受用皆現前。
轉義、受(「義」指五塵、「受」指五識):由這一轉,剎土清淨,所欲之物現前、隨意受用——淨土的受用自在,由此而成。
如是分別轉, 變化得增上, 諸智所作業, 恒時無礙行。
轉分別(指第六意識):由這一轉,諸智所作的變化,一切時無有障礙——最會分別計較的意識,轉成無礙的善巧。
如是安立轉, 變化得增上, 住佛不動句, 不住於涅槃。
轉安立(指器世界):由這一轉,安住於佛的「不動」無漏法界,卻『不入涅槃』(不取寂滅),恒起增上變化——安住不動而又不捨度生。
如是欲染轉, 變化得增上, 住佛無上樂, 示現妻無染。
轉欲染:由這一轉,得二化——一安住佛的「無上樂」,二「於妻無染」(雖示現有妻室,而心無染著)。煩惱的欲染,轉成無上法樂,示現世間相而不為所染。
如是空想轉, 變化得增上, 隨欲一切得, 所去皆無擁。
轉空想:由這一轉,得二化——「所欲皆得」(得「虛空藏」,故隨欲皆滿)、「所去無擁」(得「虛空解」,故去處無礙)。
如是無量轉, 如是無量化, 不思議所作, 諸佛依無垢。
末一頌總結:由無量的「轉」,得無量的「化」——這一切諸佛的不思議事業,通通都依著『無漏法界(無垢)』而起。前面說了八樣別轉,到此一收:轉雖無量,本只一界。所有的化,都從那一個無漏法界流出。
八、諸佛成熟眾生:佛怎樣把眾生『養』到成佛
佛化既廣,化的目的是「成熟眾生」。這一段專講佛成熟眾生的種種「因」(門路、樣式),一連用日、燈、海三組譬喻。
令集亦令長, 令熟亦令脫, 熟熟不無餘, 世間無盡故。
先說「次第成熟因」:成熟有次第——未集善根的令他聚集、已集的令增長、已長的令成熟、已熟的令解脫,使臻最極清淨。妙在後二句:『成熟了又成熟,卻不入般涅槃』,為什麼?因為世間無有窮盡——眾生度不盡,所以佛永不歇手。這一句把佛的悲心講到了底:不是度完就走,是因眾生無盡而度亦無盡。
難得已具得, 處處為物歸, 希有非希有, 由得善方便。
說「非希有相」(已成熟的菩薩之行):無上菩提的最上功德,本是「未曾有」的難得,如今已具足相應,便能恒在十方世界作眾生的歸處。這樣處處成熟眾生,是「希有」;可說它「非希有」——為什麼?因為已得善方便。所謂善方便,就是『隨機之道』,也就是清淨之行。妙在這『希有而非希有』:在眾生看是稀奇難得,在佛分上卻是任運自然(得了善方便,便如家常),不以為奇。
轉法及法沒, 得道亦涅槃, 處處方便起, 不動真法界。
說「普遍成熟因」:在「一剎那中」,佛能於此處示現轉法輪、於彼處示現正法滅、於某處示現成菩提、於某處示現入涅槃——同一剎那,八方異現,只因眾生根機不同。可奇的是末句:這樣處處方便而起,而於無漏法界卻不曾動。動的是隨機的示現,不動的是所依的法界——又是『相動而體不動』(與前「依空業無間」一脈)。
不起分別意, 成熟去來今, 處處化眾生, 三門常示現。
說「自然成熟因」:諸佛從不起這樣的念頭——『我曾度、我當度、我今度眾生』。為什麼?因為無分別(佛度生不存能度所度之念)。雖無功用,卻一切時以善根,於十方世界用「三門」(三乘的教門)成熟眾生。妙在「不起分別意」而「成熟去來今」:無心而化,正是化得徹底——存一念『我在度生』,便落功用;無此一念,化乃遍三世。
如日自然光, 照闇成百穀, 法日光亦爾, 滅惑熟眾生。
譬顯「自然」之義:像日輪不費勤勞、自然放光,處處破暗、成熟百穀;佛也這樣,雖無功用,以「法日」之光處處滅惑、成熟眾生。『無功用而成大事』,日是最好的樣板——日何曾起心要照誰、要熟誰?自然遍照而百穀自成。
一燈燃眾燈, 極聚明無盡; 一熟化多熟, 無盡化亦然。
「展轉成熟因」用燈喻:一盞燈去點燃眾燈,點成極大的燈聚、無量無數,而那一燈之明並不因分點而減損。佛也這樣:一佛成熟眾生,化使眾多成熟,成極大眾生聚,而其化力也無有窮盡。妙在「一燈無盡」:分明遍傳,自身不減——佛德分施無量眾生而自體不虧。
巨海納眾流, 無厭復無溢; 佛界攝眾善, 不滿亦不增。
「無厭成熟因」用海喻:巨海廣納百川,既無「厭足」(不嫌多)、也無「盈溢」(不嫌滿),因為它能容受。佛界也這樣:常攝無量清淨善根,卻『不滿、不增』(不會因攝得多而「滿」了、「增」了),因為佛德希有,本不可以滿增來量。海納百川而不溢,佛攝眾善而不滿——量大到無「滿」可言。
九、諸佛法界清淨:從性、因、業、位四面,再看這清淨界
這一小段是承前無漏法界,換一個角度,從性、因、業、位四義,把「法界清淨」再點一遍,引出下文的三身。
二障已永除, 法如得清淨, 諸物及緣智, 自在亦無盡。
法界的「性」義:清淨相——煩惱、智二障都已永盡(法界如得清淨);自在相——對「諸物」及『緣彼之智』二者都得自在、永無窮盡。性,就是它『淨而自在』的本相。
一切種如智, 修淨法界因, 利樂化眾生, 此果亦無盡。
法界的「因」義:為使法界清淨,一切時修「一切種如門智」作為因;為教化眾生,一切時與眾生『利、樂』二果,恒無窮盡。修如智是因,利樂眾生是果——因果都「無盡」。
發起身口心, 三業恒時化, 二門及二聚, 方便悉圓滿。
法界的「業」義:發起身、口、心三業,一切時教化眾生;以「二門」(三昧門、陀羅尼門)、「二聚」(福德聚、智慧聚)為方便,悉皆圓滿。業,就是它『三業化生、二門二聚為具』的作用。
自性及法食, 變化位差別, 此由法界淨, 諸佛之所說。
法界的「位」義:自性身、食身(受用身)、化身,這是「位」的差別;而這三位之所以能成立,全由「法界清淨」——法界若不清淨,這三身之位便不成。這一頌是個橋:從「法界清淨」直接逗出下面的「三身」——三身正是清淨法界的三種位差別。
十、諸佛三身:法、食、化,一本而二依
承上「位」義,專講「三身」。先立三身、辨其依止與相,再說三身的二利、常住、平等。
性身及食身、 化身合三身, 應知第一身, 餘二之依止。
一切諸佛有三身:自性身(由「轉依相」而立——清淨法界當體)、食身(在大集會眾中作「法食」,以法滋養聖眾)、化身(作所化眾生的利益)。要緊的一句:自性身,是食身、化身的依止——它是「本」。一本(自性身)而二末(食、化),二身皆從自性身起。
食身於諸界, 受用有差別, 眾土名身業, 一切皆異故。
單說「食身」:它在一切世界中,徒眾、剎土、名號、身、業——這些受用之事,各各不同。為什麼受用身要「有差別」?因為它是對地上菩薩受用法樂而現的,隨界隨眾而異。
平等微細身, 受用身相合, 應知受用身, 得是化身因。
把三身的關係再理一層:平等指自性身(一切諸佛平等無別)、微細(此身難知)、受用身(食身)與平等身相合(依自性身而起);而受用身又是化身之因(隨所欲受用而一切示現,化身從此出)。一條依生的鏈:自性身(平等)→ 受用身(食)→ 化身。
化佛無量化, 是故名化身, 二身二利成, 一切種建立。
單說「化身」:化佛一切時化作無量差別,故名「化身」。再點「二身二利」:「二身」即食身、化身;「二利」即自利、他利——食身以「自利成就」為相、化身以「他利成就」為相,二利在一切種上都成就,便依次建立食、化二身。
工巧及出生, 得道般涅槃, 示此大方便, 令他得解脫。
化身的「他利」相,鋪開來看:化身一切時教化眾生,或現工巧(技藝)、或現出生、或現得菩提、或現般涅槃——種種示大方便,都令眾生得解脫。釋迦一代示現(降生、成道、涅槃),正是這『化身他利』的樣子。
應知佛三身, 是佛身皆攝, 自他利依止, 示現悉三身。
收一句:這三身攝盡一切諸佛之身,因為它示現了「自利、他利」的一切依止——佛身雖萬,不出此三。
由依心業故, 三佛俱平等, 自性無間續, 三佛俱常住。
最後說三身的「平等」與「常住」。平等:由「依」故自性身平等(法界無別)、由「心」故食身平等(佛心無別)、由「業」故化身平等(同一所作)。常住:由「自性常」故自性身常住(畢竟無漏)、由「無間常」故食身常住(說法無斷絕)、由「相續常」故化身常住(雖此滅、復彼現)。妙在化身的「常住」:化身明明有生有滅,怎麼也「常住」?——因為「相續常」:此處隱了、彼處又現,如燈燈相續,光明不斷。三身各有各的「常」,合成佛之恒在。這一偈在古德那裡分量很重:太賢《成唯識論學記》論佛身之常,便全句引「自性無間續,三佛俱常住」為明據(學記引文末二字作「堂中」,是傳寫之異)——佛身常住之義,古德即以本品此偈為所本。
十一、諸佛智:轉八識成四智,束四智具三身(全品經眼)
到此,佛的身講完了,釋文說:「已說諸佛身,次說諸佛智。」——這就是李百藥序裡獨標的那顆眼珠:轉識成智、四智三身。佛果的「智」是什麼、它怎樣從凡夫八識「轉」出來、又怎樣與前面的三身相配。
本品明說「八七六五識,次第轉得」,由八識次第配得四智;但此頌並未明判識、智是否同一實體,也未明說八識智性本具。故本疏在此只傳述『轉某識得某智』的次第,不以冰水、雲日另證同體或本具。
〔他論借喻〕《究竟一乘寶性論》有『糞穢中真金』『弊衣纏金像』二喻,可供比較其去垢顯金的說法;但這是他論語境,只作旁參,不用來證成本品識智同體或智性本具。
總標:八識翻成四智
四智鏡不動, 三智之所依, 八七六五識, 次第轉得故。
一切諸佛都有四種智:一鏡智(即大圓鏡智)、二平等智(平等性智)、三觀智(妙觀察智)、四作事智(成所作智)。
- 「鏡不動,三智之所依」——鏡智以「不動」為相,恒作其餘三智的依止。為什麼?因為那三智是「動」的(隨機應緣而起用),而鏡智如如不動,是其餘三智的根。
- 「八七六五識,次第轉得」——本品依次配為:轉第八阿賴耶識得鏡智,轉第七末那識得平等智,轉第六意識得觀智,轉前五識得作事智。本疏止於傳述此配對,不另加『煩惱當體即菩提』之判。
鏡智:轉第八識,萬像之所從現
鏡智緣無分, 相續恒不斷, 不愚諸所識,諸相不現前。
這顯「轉第八識得鏡智」,逐句解它的四個特質:緣無分(緣一切境不作分段,一味平等地照)、相續恒不斷(一切時恒運,不曾斷絕)、不愚諸所識(對一切境的障永斷,無所不了)、諸相不現前(照一切境卻離粗顯行相,照而不執)。
鏡智諸智因, 說是大智藏, 餘身及餘智,像現從此起。
這顯鏡智的「用」,點出它在四智中的根本地位:平等智等其餘諸智,種種都以鏡智為因,所以鏡智好比一個「大寶藏」——萬德從中出。不止智,連佛的「餘身」(受用身等)和「餘智」(平等智等),它們的影像也都從這鏡智中生起。這裡藏著「鏡智」得名的由來:正因萬身萬智的影像,都像鏡中影那樣從它如實現起——現一切而自體不動——所以佛把這智叫「鏡智」。不妨把前頌四個特質都收到這面鏡上看:鏡照物不揀大小、不切成塊,是「緣無分」;鏡長明不滅,是「相續恒不斷」;鏡無所不照、纖毫畢現,是「不愚諸所識」;鏡現影而不黏影、影來不迎影去不留,是「諸相不現前」。一面鏡子,四義齊備。
這『現一切而自體不動』的鏡德,諸經各有其說,可與本智互參。《楞伽經》說:「譬如明鏡,頓現一切無相色像」——一面鏡子一時頓現萬象,卻不揀次第、不留行相,正是「諸相不現前」而「緣無分」的那一味。《大乘起信論》說「覺體」的鏡德更細,列為四鏡,其中說那如實不空的鏡:「一切世間境界悉於中現,不出不入、不失不壞,常住一心」——萬境於鏡中現,鏡卻不因像來而「入」、不因像去而「失」,故鏡體不隨像轉。鏡智之為萬智所依、為「大寶藏」,正在這「不出不入、不失不壞」八字——照而不黏,現而不動。
平等智:轉第七識,我執翻成大悲
眾生平等智, 修淨證菩提, 不住於涅槃, 以無究竟故。
這顯「轉第七識得平等智」。第七末那,本是恆執第八為「我」的那個識——我執的老巢;一轉,恰成『對一切眾生平等』的智。證法現前的那一刻,即得視一切眾生平等的智;修到最極清淨,便證無上菩提。而「不住涅槃」——因為眾生無窮無盡,度生之事沒有終點;正因沒有終點,佛才不安住涅槃,恒在生死中度眾。不住涅槃不是做不到涅槃,而是悲心太大,不肯獨自歇下。這一轉可借兩個像體會:末那執「我」,像在自己與他人之間砌起一道牆,牆內是「我」、牆外是「他」;牆一拆,內外成一片,再看眾生與己無二——這是「平等」;再無內外之隔,眾生苦樂便如自己苦樂,大悲自然湧出,攔都攔不住。又像一位慈母,自己縱已登上安岸,眼看孩子還困在險難裡,斷無獨自歇下之理,必一回回涉水去救——佛之「不住涅槃」,正是這樣的悲心。
大慈與大悲, 是二恒無絕, 眾生若有信, 佛像即現前。
這顯平等智的「用」:大慈大悲恒常不斷,諸佛一切時隨護眾生。『眾生只要有信,佛的形象就現前』——佛隨眾生所信而示現:有的見如來青色、有的見黃色,皆隨其信心而應現。釋文在此收一句要緊的話:以上鏡智、平等智這「前二智」,就是「法身」。
觀智:轉第六識,分別翻成妙觀察
觀智識所識, 恒時無有礙, 此智如大藏, 總持三昧依。
這顯「轉第六識得觀智」。第六意識本是最會分別計較的識;一轉,恰成『妙觀察』——分別的力量不再用於妄執,而成無礙的善巧觀照。觀智對所識一切境恒無障礙,好比一個大寶藏,是一切「陀羅尼門」(總持——總攝憶持一切法義的力量)和一切「三昧門」(種種正定)的依止;因為這兩類法門都從觀智而生。
恒在大眾中, 種種皆示現, 能斷諸疑網, 雨大法雨故。
這顯觀智的「用」:觀智恒在大眾法會中,種種示現,能斷盡眾生的疑網、降下大法雨——說法度生、解疑釋惑,正是妙觀察智的本領。釋文再收一句配身:這觀智,就是「食身」(受用身)。
作事智:轉前五識,成種種化事
事智於諸界, 種種化事起, 無量不思議, 為利群生故。
這顯「轉前五識得作事智」。前五識本是對五塵作了別的識;一轉,成了能在一切世界中作種種變化之事的智——作種種變化之事,無量無邊、不可思議,這一切事業都為利益一切眾生。釋文收一句配身:這作事智,就是「化身」。
四智具三身:束四智以成三身
到此,四智各別講完,釋文隨各智已點出它所成的身。把它收攏,便是序所說的「束四智以具三身」:鏡智、平等智 → 法身(前二智即是法身);觀智 → 食身(受用身);作事智 → 化身。
攝持及等心, 開法亦作事, 如是依四義, 次第四智起。
最後一頌把四智的生起總結成一個次第,四義配四智,井然有序:「攝持」(總攝聞法,是鏡智)、「等心」(於一切眾生得自他平等,是平等智)、「開法」(演說正法、斷疑說法,是觀智)、「作事」(起種種化業,是作事智)——依著這四種意義,四智依次生起。一根(鏡智)三用(平等、觀、作事),收成三身,佛果的智與身於是圓備。
〔疏借喻〕為便於初讀,可借一月千江體會三身的『一/三』關係:天上只一輪明月(借喻法身),月光遍灑(借喻受用身),千江萬水各映月影(借喻化身)。月只一個,水面的月影卻有千萬——不是把月分成千份,而是隨水而現。此喻僅作讀法提示,不是本論所引,也不作三身義的獨立證據;本段義據仍在上引偈釋。
〔一點交代,留給有心深究的人:『四智配三身』,本論本品是這樣配的(鏡、平等二智為法身,觀智為受用身,作事智為化身)。到了後來慈恩一系(窺基《義林章》、《成唯識論》)所配略有不同——那邊是『平等性智、妙觀察智為受用身,大圓鏡智為自性身』。這是系內由早期(莊嚴)到集大成(成唯識)之間,配身之說的一段演移。兩說古德並傳,本疏依本論本品而講,那一段異同,〈考據〉裡並錄而不判,學者可自參。〕
十二、諸佛不一不多:佛是一尊,還是多尊
四智講畢,釋文附帶解一個容易卡住的問:佛到底是「一」是「多」?——答:非一,亦非多。
性別及不虛, 一切亦無始, 無別故不一, 依同故不多。
說佛「不一」(不只一尊),憑五義:性別(無邊諸佛性各別;若唯一佛,卻又有「當得菩提」的菩薩將成佛,豈不矛盾)、不虛(福智之聚若虛無實效,別的菩薩就不該得菩提;二聚不虛,可見不止一佛)、一切(若唯一佛,這佛就不能利益一切眾生;佛既成就一切眾生作佛,可見不止一)、無始(若唯最初一佛,他應沒積二聚就成佛了,不通)、無別(若另有佛沒積二聚而成,不通)。說佛「不多」(不是散亂多體),憑一義:依同——一切諸佛的法身都依著同一無漏界。一句話:從『成佛各有因地』看,佛不止一尊;從『法身同依無漏界』看,佛又不是各不相干的多。不一不多,正是佛的真相。
十三、入佛方便:怎樣才走得進這佛果
佛果(身、智、界)既明,最切要的問題來了:凡夫怎樣才入得了這佛果?這一段給「入佛方便」——四頌,層層逼出一條「無分別」的路。
分別若恒有, 真實則永無; 分別若永無, 真實則恒有。
先立一個此消彼長的鐵則:「分別」(妄計)與「真實」(真如),勢不兩立——分別若恒在,真實便永不可得;分別若盡除,真實便恒常現前。要入佛果,先得看清:擋在真實前面的,正是這個「分別」。
欲修最上修, 不見一切修; 欲得最上得, 不見一切得。
進一層:什麼是『最上的修』?——不見有「修」可修(無修相);什麼是『最上的得』?——不見有「得」可得(無得相)。一存『我在修、我有得』的相,就落了分別,便不是最上。最上的修證,恰恰是修而無修相、得而無得相。
尊重及長時, 觀佛希有法, 緣此速得佛, 去佛菩提遠。
下一頌敲一記警鐘:有菩薩對佛極生尊重、又長時精勤觀佛的未曾有法,卻緣著這觀心與精進,起一念「我當速得無上菩提」——這樣的菩薩,反而離佛菩提甚遠。為什麼?因為他有「慢」(暗藏一個『我要速得』的我慢)。這一句最是切中要害:連『尊重佛、長時精進』這樣的善,一旦夾帶「我當速得」的我相,都成了去佛之遠的障——可見『分別、我慢』之難除。
觀法唯分別, 此義如前知; 菩薩無分別, 說彼速成佛。
末一頌給出正路:若菩薩觀『一切法唯是分別』(如前所知之義),又進一步觀『那能分別的心也無分別』,便得入「無生忍位」——由此說他得菩提。一條路:先觀法唯分別(破所取)、再觀分別亦無分別(破能取),能所雙泯,便是「速成佛」的正方便。前頌『欲速得反遠』、此頌『無分別反速』——正反一照,「入佛方便」的眼目全在「無分別」三字。
十四、諸佛同事:菩薩各別,入了佛體便同一味
入了佛果,諸佛之間是什麼關係?——這一段用一個極好的江海喻,說諸佛『同一體用』。
應知諸河水, 別依亦別事, 水少虫用少, 未入大海故。 一切入大海, 一依亦一事, 水大虫用大, 亦復常無盡。 如是諸別解, 別意亦別業, 解少利益少, 未入佛體故。 一切入佛體, 一解亦一意, 解大利益大, 極聚亦無盡。
譬喻分兩半,對得極工整:未入海時——諸河各有各的河床(別依)、各作各的事(別事),水量少、水中之虫的受用也少,因為『還沒同入大海』。菩薩也這樣:未入佛體時,理解各別(別解)、用心各別(別意)、所作各別(別業),解得少、利益眾生也少。一旦入海——眾水同一海床(一依)、同一海體,水成一、事業也成一,水量浩大、水虫受用也大,且常無窮盡。菩薩也這樣:一旦同入佛體,便同一用心(一意)、同一理解(一解),作業成一、利益廣大,乃至遍盡一切眾生聚也無有窮盡。妙在這『百川入海便同一味』:諸佛不是各據一方的多體,是同入一佛體後的『一解一意』——所以前面說「不多」,根據正在這裡。眾水入海,便不復分彼此;眾菩薩入佛體,便同一智海。
結:勸進悕求——這樣的佛果,智者應當去求
全品最後,釋文以一頌勸發菩提心作結——把前面講盡的佛果,化成一句『你也該去求』。
無比圓白法, 眾生利樂因, 樂住無盡藏, 智者應求發。
把佛果三面收成三句:無比圓白法(佛的自利成就——萬德圓滿,無可與比)、眾生利樂因(佛的利他成就——是一切眾生利樂的根源)、樂住無盡藏(佛的善根無過無上,是一座取之不竭的「無盡樂藏」)。所以末句直勸:有智之人,應當為求得這最殊勝的佛果而發大菩提心。 前面一品講佛果的因、果、身、智、界、業,末後落在「應求發」:此頌以勸求、勸發作結,不以『讀者已具足佛果』作為理由。「菩提品究竟」,而本品給學人的收束,是為求佛果而發菩提心。
結:全品的一條線
把這一品連起來看,菩提品是一幅佛果的全圖,一段扣一段:
先說因果圓滿(難善時障已盡,如大篋開而眾寶現)→ 說佛身無二相(白法為身,如藏如雲)→ 說無上歸依(救護三染、勝因大,眾生最後的歸投)→ 說如來轉依(斷二障、得二道,不動如山王;佛體遍眾生如空遍色,雖遍不見如水器壞、月不現,出沒如火聚)→ 說事業無功用(如意珠、天鼓,無心而成)→ 說無漏法界甚深(相、處、業三甚深;八業如八日;說之如染畫空;諸眾生名為如來藏)→ 說諸佛變化(化最增上、最甚深;八別轉變化,皆依無垢)→ 說成熟眾生(次第、普遍、自然、展轉、無厭;如日成穀、一燈燃眾燈、巨海納流)→ 說法界清淨(性因業位四義)→ 說諸佛三身(法食化,一本二依,平等常住)→ 說諸佛智(轉八識成四智、束四智具三身——此即經眼)→ 說佛不一不多(因別故不一,依同故不多)→ 說入佛方便(無分別乃速成佛)→ 說諸佛同事(入佛體如百川入海,同一味)→ 終於勸進悕求(智者應發菩提心)。
這正接續真實品『五位』走到底所說的轉依之果。本品依「八七六五識,次第轉得」列出八識與四智的配對,又由四智說到三身;本頌未明判轉前轉後同一識體,本疏也不把『當體即是』加作結論。譯經序稱此品「詳諸經論所未曾有」「聞所未聞、見所未見」——全品把佛果從因到果、從身到智、從界到業次第鋪開,而『轉識成智、四智三身』一段尤為其眼。
The Awakening Chapter (菩提品) is the "eye" of the Treatise Adorning the Mahāyāna Scriptures (大乘莊嚴經論). In his preface to the translation, Li Baiyao singles out this one chapter as "the most subtle and wondrous of all," saying that it "transforms the eight consciousnesses so as to accomplish the four wisdoms, and gathers the four wisdoms so as to furnish the three bodies — set out in fullness as the scriptures and treatises had never done before." Yet this "transforming consciousness into wisdom, the four wisdoms and the three bodies" is only one especially prominent section; the chapter proceeds through the causes, body, wisdom, works, and uncontaminated dharma-realm of buddhahood, and closes by urging one to arouse the mind and seek. This exposition follows that major sequence section by section.
It stands as a pair with the Chapter on Reality: the Chapter on Reality expounds the path of cultivation-and-realization (the five positions, ending in "the transformation of the basis"); the Awakening Chapter expounds the fruit of cultivation-and-realization (once the transformation of the basis is complete, that is precisely the wisdom, the body, the works, and the realm set forth here). Walk the path to its end, and what it bears is this whole tree of fruit.
Let one key that runs through the entire chapter be made plain at the outset: the eight consciousnesses (八識) and the transformation of the basis (轉依, āśraya-parāvṛtti). Consciousness-Only (唯識) divides mind-consciousness into eight: the prior five consciousnesses (eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body, which discriminate the five sense-objects); the sixth, mind-consciousness (第六意識, which discriminates and deliberates); the seventh, manas (第七末那識, the defiled consciousness that grasps the eighth as a "self"); and the eighth, store consciousness (第八阿賴耶識, the root consciousness that holds seeds). Later the chapter pairs these four groups with the four wisdoms through "the eighth, seventh, sixth, and five consciousnesses are attained in sequence through transformation." This sequence is an important thread of the chapter, but the verse does not decide whether what precedes and follows is one identical consciousness-substance, nor does this line establish that the defiled eight consciousnesses are not annihilated. This exposition therefore follows the sequence in explaining the wisdom, body, realm, and works of buddhahood without adding a verdict of substantial identity.
1. The Wisdom of All Modes: Both the "Cause" and the "Fruit" of Becoming a Buddha Are Already Complete
The prose commentary says: the foregoing has finished expounding "the bodhisattva maturing sentient beings"; next is to be expounded "the bodhisattva's attaining the wisdom of all modes" (一切種智) — that all-knowing wisdom which is the fruit of Buddhahood.
At the outset one line is put as a question: for a person to walk all the way to "becoming a Buddha," what, after all, must be complete? The first verse answers the side of the "cause":
All hardships already done, all good already gathered, all time already traversed, all obstruction already cut.
The cause of "the wisdom of all modes" is complete when these four "alls" have been carried to the very end: all hardships already done — the immeasurable hundreds of thousands of kinds of hard practice have all been practiced through, never once wearying; all good already gathered — the roots of good whose very nature is the six perfections (六波羅蜜) have all been gathered in; all time already traversed — the long kalpas and long stretches of time have all been passed through (this is no matter of one or two lifetimes); all obstruction already cut — even the subtlest, finest obstructions on all the grounds have been cut off to the last. One must feel the weight of these four lines: becoming a Buddha is no bargain won in a single thought; it is hard practice, roots of good, long time, and the cutting of obstruction — each and every one cultivated to the two words "all," before the ground of the cause is counted complete.
The cause being complete, what is the "fruit" like? The second verse answers:
The accomplishing of all modes — this itself is the Buddha's body; as when a great chest is opened, and no jewel within fails to appear.
The prose commentary speaks of this fruit from three layers: attainment (from this point on, the wisdom of all modes is accomplished); essential nature (this very wisdom of all modes, in its own substance, is the Buddha's body); and simile — and this simile most repays reflection: the fruit of Buddhahood is like a great treasure-chest suddenly flung open, all the jewels within appearing at once before the eye. Why "a chest opened, the jewels appearing"? Because "the inconceivable jewels of the factors of awakening" — the powers, the fearlessnesses, the exclusive dharmas, that whole store of qualities — are not added on one by one at leisure; rather, at the very moment the ground of the cause is completed, the lid lifts and the myriad virtues appear all together. Cultivating the cause is like heaping jewels into the chest, realizing the fruit is like opening the chest and the treasures appearing: what was heaped up is precisely what now, in this very moment, appears.
Here the prose commentary points out the first pivot of the whole chapter: this "wisdom of all modes" is itself the "Buddha's body." What follows then asks: this "body" — is it "existent" or "non-existent"?
2. The Buddha's Body Free of the Two Extremes: To Call It "Existent" Is Wrong, To Call It "Non-existent" Is Wrong
The white dharmas are the Buddha's body — not non-existent, not existent either; the Buddha is the cause of the dharma-jewel, the Dharma in turn the cause of roots of good.
Since the wisdom of all modes has been said to be the Buddha's body, then this Buddha-body is the substance into which the "white dharmas" (白法, all the pure and good dharmas, the six perfections and the rest) have been transformed. But the moment one goes to ask whether it is "existent" or "non-existent," the prose commentary at once sets the matter straight: not non-existent, not existent either. To say it is "not non-existent," because it is no different from suchness (真如 is not annihilation); to say it is "not existent," because it has no establishable real self-nature. This is called "free of the two extremes" (無二相) — falling into neither the "existent" side nor the "non-existent" side. Why must "free of the two extremes" be established for the Buddha-body right after? Because to grasp the Buddha-body as really "existent" falls into superimposition; to grasp it as annihilated "non-existent" falls into denial — the Buddha-body is precisely the middle-way substance that departs from these two extremes.
The latter two lines bring out the Buddha-body's "generative power": the Buddha is the cause of the dharma-jewel (the Buddha proclaims all dharmas, and further manifests them by supernormal power, and so the Buddha is the cause of the "dharma-jewel"); the Dharma in turn is the cause of roots of good (the Dharma is in turn the cause of sentient beings' "roots of good"). The prose commentary draws a farming comparison: with sentient beings as the field and roots of good as the grain — the dharma-jewel falls into the field of sentient beings, and there the grain of roots of good grows up. A single chain of growth: the Buddha gives birth to the Dharma, the Dharma gives birth to roots of good.
The next verse "brings out the foregoing meaning again," gathering this chain into two still more vivid images:
Possessing the dharmas and free of the dharmas, like a treasury and like a cloud; giving birth to the Dharma and raining down the rain of Dharma — so are these similes made.
Possessing the dharmas and free of the dharmas: the Buddhas fully possess all good dharmas, and are also free of all unwholesome dharmas — one possessing, one freeing, and the virtue is complete. What matters is the twofold simile in the latter line: the Buddha-jewel is like a "great treasury," the dharma-jewel is like a "great cloud." Why matched this way? The prose commentary itself answers it: the sense taken is "giving birth to the Dharma, raining down the Dharma" — the Buddha-jewel can give birth to the dharma-jewel, just as a great treasury of jewels can give birth to the many jewels (the treasury is the source that "gives birth"); the dharma-jewel can nourish and grow sentient beings' roots of good, just as a great cloud sending down rain can nourish and grow the hundred grains (the cloud is the bestowal that "moistens-and-gives-life"). One is a treasury (whence the myriad jewels come forth), one is a cloud (the sweet rain sprinkled everywhere so that all things grow of themselves): the Buddha and the Dharma stand to sentient beings' roots of good just so — one a source, one a moistening.
3. The Unsurpassed Refuge: Why the Buddha Is That One Place to Which Sentient Beings Can Finally Return
The Buddha-body being now clear, the following section asks a more intimate thing: within the bitter sea of birth-and-death, is there, after all, a place of refuge for sentient beings that can be relied on, relied on to the very end? This whole section expounds the "unsurpassed refuge" (無上歸依) — first in brief, then at large, then pointing out wherein it is "surpassing" and wherein it is "great."
The Buddhas ever save and protect sentient beings' three defilements: the afflictions, the evil deeds, and birth, old age, and death.
Briefly setting forth "saving and protecting": the Buddhas save and protect to the very last (they save all the way, never letting go halfway). Save and protect from what? Sentient beings' three kinds of defilement — the defilement of affliction (the afflictions, the class of greed, hatred, and delusion), the defilement of karma (the evil deeds, the evil karma wrought), and the defilement of birth (birth, old age, and death, saṃsāra itself). Note that these three layers stand in sequence: affliction gives rise to karma, karma summons birth — from the affliction at the root, to the karma wrought, to the fruit of suffering undergone, the Buddha saves and protects the whole chain of saṃsāra, "at all times saving and protecting without letting go." These two words, "not letting go," are the meaning of "to the very last."
The various calamities and the evil destinies, the view of self and also the lesser vehicle — sentient beings such as these, one and all, are saved and protected.
Setting forth "saving and protecting" at large, spreading out the sentient beings who are saved so that class by class none is omitted: the various calamities — the blind, the deaf, the mute, the mad, the deranged, the maimed; by the Buddha's power the blind come to see, the deaf to hear, the mute to speak, the mad to right mind, the deranged to concentration, the maimed to wholeness; the evil destinies — the beings of the hells and the rest, whom the Buddha's light touches and illumines, causing them to be freed of suffering and to fall no more; the view of self — the beings who grasp at a "self," made to awaken to the "no-self of persons" and enter the nirvāṇa of the two vehicles; the lesser vehicle — those of indeterminate two-vehicle lineage, drawn by skillful means to turn back and enter the great vehicle (大乘). From the maimed in bodily faculty, to those fallen into evil destinies, to those grasping at self, to those stalled in the lesser — all four classes are gathered in entire: one may see that "saving and protecting" is not the saving of one kind of person only, but that all sentient beings, high and low, deep and shallow, are within this net.
The Buddha is the surpassing place of refuge, unsurpassed because beyond compare; the manifold fears as spoken above — there is not one from which he does not set free.
Wherein is the refuge "surpassing"? — Beyond compare, therefore unsurpassed. The Buddha has no one that can be set beside him, and so he is the "unsurpassed" place of refuge; and just because he is unsurpassed, of the three defilements, the various calamities, and all the fears spoken above, there is not one from which he cannot set sentient beings free. Herein lies the true meaning of "refuge": the more ultimate and unsurpassed the object to which you return, the deeper the floor of the rescue that reaches you — only in returning to the unsurpassed is there the guarantee of "not one from which he does not set free."
The Buddhas, bodies full of good, surpassing all the world, convert sentient beings with wondrous Dharma, for they have crossed the sea of compassion.
The "cause" of the refuge's surpassing — on what strength can the Buddha be this unsurpassed refuge? On two things: first, self-benefit brought to the ultimate (the Buddhas' bodies full of good, surpassing all the world — the qualities of power, fearlessness, and the rest, complete as their very nature, so that they themselves have first reached the far shore); second, benefit of others brought to the ultimate (they convert sentient beings with wondrous Dharma, having crossed the sea of great compassion to the far shore). One who has not himself reached the shore cannot save others; the Buddha is complete in self-benefit and yet more complete in the vow of compassion, and so is fit to be a refuge.
To the very limit of the future, reaching universally all beings, benefiting them at all times — this is called the greatness of the refuge.
Wherein is the refuge "great"? In three senses: greatness of time (exhausting the very limit of all sentient beings' birth-and-death, saving to the limit of the future); greatness of scope (taking all sentient beings as its object, choosing out not one); greatness of work (at all times performing benefit, saving from suffering, causing deliverance). Unending in time, unremitting in object, unresting in work — the "greatness" lies in these three "un-"s. One line gathers this section: the Buddha as refuge is surpassing (unsurpassed), caused (the twofold benefit of self and other brought to the ultimate), and great (the three inexhaustibles of time, scope, and work), and so is the last, the surest, the most thorough place of return for sentient beings.
4. The Characteristic of the Tathāgata's Transformation of the Basis: The Root of the Fruit of Buddhahood Is the Whole Overturning of the Ordinary Being's "Basis"
This whole section is the spine of the entire chapter — it expounds "the transformation of the basis." What has gone before, expounding the Buddha-body and the refuge, is all well; but where is the root of all this? The root lies in the transformation of the basis: turning the defiled "basis" over into purity. First it asks: this one "turning" — what, after all, does it overturn, and what does it attain?
The seeds of the two obstructions ever pursue; their cessation is a cutting most vast, for the white dharmas are complete — the basis being turned, the two paths are accomplished.
The transformation of the basis has a "freeing-from" and also an "attaining." The side of freeing-from (the counteracted set at a distance): the seeds of the two obstructions — the afflictive obstruction and the cognitive obstruction — from beginningless time have ever pursued us; now they are "cut most vast" — "most" is on all the grounds, "vast" is in all their kinds, so that even the deepest, finest seeds are forever extinguished. The side of attaining (the counteragent accomplished): the Buddha's substance corresponds with the supreme and complete white dharmas, and at that moment, the "basis" once turned, the two paths are accomplished — one, "the path of the utterly pure supramundane wisdom" (illumining the true), and two, "the path of the wisdom whose objects are the boundless knowables" (illumining the conventional). This is what is called the transformation of the basis: cutting the seeds of the two obstructions (freeing-from), attaining the two paths of wisdom (attaining) — the two sides of one and the same overturning.
There the Tathāgata abides, unmoving as the king of mountains; he pities even those who delight in cessation — how much more those attached to existence.
This one turning — why, among all "turnings," is it the most surpassing? Because the uncontaminated realm in which the Tathāgata abides after the transformation of the basis is "unmoving as the king of mountains" — like the king of the mountain ranges set firm upon the great earth, abiding without shaking. Why borrow the "king of mountains"? To bring out that weight of abiding unmoving, never again to fall back: the ordinary being's mind flows and turns with objects; even the two vehicles' realization can still be shaken; the Buddha alone, in this one turning, is like the king of mountains set firm upon the earth, never to fall away. And within this unmoving there is held a great compassion: the Buddha, abiding thus, looks back upon those śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas who "delight in quiescent cessation" and still gives rise to pity (sighing that they seek only their own release); how much more those, far off in the low and the mean, who are attached to "existence" and undergo suffering? — unmoving yet not cold, abiding yet the compassionate heart the more urgent: this is the Buddha's "surpassing transformation."
Benefit of others and the unsurpassed, not-turned and unarisen, vast and free of the two, non-abiding and equal, excellent and universally bestowed — this is called the Tathāgata's turning, displaying ten qualities, whose differing meanings should be known.
These two verses list the merits of "the Tathāgata's turning" as ten kinds of quality; it is worth acknowledging them one by one: ① the turning that is for others' benefit (once turned, it is for benefiting others); ② the unsurpassed turning (attaining mastery over all dharmas, surpassing the two vehicles' turning); ③ the not-turned turning (the defiling causes can no longer turn this "basis"); ④ the unarisen turning (all defiled dharmas utterly do not arise); ⑤ the vast turning (able to display great awakening and the great final nirvāṇa); ⑥ the turning free of the two (birth-and-death and nirvāṇa are without duality); ⑦ the non-abiding turning (abiding in neither the conditioned nor the unconditioned); ⑧ the equal turning (together with the two vehicles equally liberated from the afflictive obstruction); ⑨ the excellent turning (the powers, fearlessnesses, and the rest of the Buddha-dharmas without equal); ⑩ the universally-bestowed turning (ever instructing sentient beings by all the vehicles). The ten seem scattered, but in truth a single thread strings them: this one "turning" — downward it can benefit others and bestow universally (compassion), upward it can be masterful and excellent (wisdom), toward itself it can be not-turned and unarisen (steadfast), and toward birth-and-death and nirvāṇa it can be free of the two and non-abiding (the middle way) — wisdom, compassion, steadfastness, and the middle way, the whole rubric of the Buddha's virtues, are all within this one turning.
The transformation of the basis being now clear, the prose commentary goes on to use three vivid similes to expound thoroughly the relation between "the Buddha-substance after the transformation of the basis" and sentient beings — does it pervade or not? Is it seen or not? How does it come forth and pass away?
As space pervades all things, so the Buddha too pervades all; as space pervades all forms, so the Buddhas pervade sentient beings.
First, "pervasion": the Buddha-substance is like space — space pervades all form-dharmas, while the verse says that the Buddhas pervade sentient beings. Someone will ask: sentient beings plainly are not now Buddhas, so how can the Buddha-substance be said to "pervade" sentient beings? The prose commentary answers, "because they are not yet accomplished": sentient beings have not yet accomplished the fruit of buddhahood. This exposition reports that answer without expanding "not yet accomplished" into a verdict that an already-present Buddha-nature is merely screened over.
As when the water-vessel is broken, the moon's image appears not; so through sentient beings' faults, the Buddha's image too appears not.
But since the Buddha-substance pervades all, why do sentient beings not see the Buddha? — for this the second simile is needed: the water-vessel and the moon's reflection. The moon in the sky has all along been there; yet if the vessel that holds the water is broken and the water leaks away, then the water's surface reflects no image of the moon — it is not that the moon is not there, but that the vessel that bears the moon is broken. In the same way, the Buddha's image has all along pervaded and illumined; only through sentient beings' faults (the karmic obstructions), like a broken and leaking water-vessel, is there no reflecting of the Buddha who has been there all along. That it is not seen — the fault lies in the vessel of sentient beings, not in the moon of the Buddha. This simile best resolves sentient beings' doubt: the Buddha has never not been there; it is that this basin of mine has grown turbid, has leaked away.
As the nature of a mass of fire is now ablaze, now burned out, so the transformations of the Buddhas now come forth, now enter nirvāṇa.
The third simile speaks of "coming forth and entering nirvāṇa": the verse compares the transformations of the Buddhas coming forth and entering nirvāṇa to a mass of fire blazing and going out. That is the scope of the comparison. This exposition does not infer from the extinguished fire-mass that "the nature of fire remains," or use the simile to establish some further enduring substance.
5. The Tathāgata's Works Are Ever Effortless: The Buddha Delivers Beings, Yet Spends Not a Single Thought of Contrivance
Following the above, since the Buddha is like a fire now coming forth, now passing away, is the Buddha then very "forceful," very "deliberate," in doing all these works? This section answers: no. The Buddha's works are "effortless" (無功用) — accomplished of themselves, without recourse to contrivance.
The wish-fulfilling jewel and the heavenly drum accomplish their own work of themselves; the Buddha's transforming and the Buddha's teaching are, without thought, likewise so.
Two excellent similes are set out together: the wish-fulfilling jewel (如意寶珠), though it has no mind, can yet of itself manifest all manner of things (in accord with what a person seeks, the jewel of itself responds); the heavenly drum (天鼓), though it has no mind, can yet of itself send forth all manner of wondrous sounds. The Buddha is like this too — the Buddha manifests all manner of transformations (the Buddha's transforming), like the jewel's manifesting, manifesting without mind; the Buddha teaches all manner of wondrous Dharma (the Buddha's teaching), like the heavenly drum's resounding, teaching without thought. One must feel the wonder of this "effortlessness": the ordinary being, to do a thing, must set a thought stirring, must exert force; but the Buddha delivers beings as the jewel reflects things, as the drum sounds of itself, without waiting to set the mind stirring and thought moving — accomplished by letting things run their course. The more ultimate, the less forceful.
Resting on space, the works are unbroken, yet the works have their increase and decrease; resting on the realm, the deeds are unceasing, yet the deeds have their arising and ceasing.
Again, from a simile of "resting on space," it expounds how the "unbroken" and the "arising and ceasing" of the Buddha's deeds run side by side without contradiction: the myriad affairs of the world are done resting upon space, and space is never cut off (so the world's affairs are "unbroken"), yet the world's affairs in themselves have their increase and decrease. The Buddha too is so — resting upon the uncontaminated realm he performs the Buddha's deeds, and that "basis" on which the Buddha's deeds are performed (the uncontaminated realm) is never cut off (so the Buddha's deeds are "unbroken"), while the aspect of the Buddha's deeds manifested may yet have its coming forth and passing away, its arising and ceasing. In a word: the "substance" of the Buddha's deeds (the uncontaminated realm rested upon) is ever constant and unbroken, while the "aspect" of the Buddha's deeds (manifested in accord with capacities) has its rising and its subsiding — as space is ever present while the world's affairs have their increase and decrease.
6. The Profundity of the Uncontaminated Dharma-Realm: Wherein the "Realm" in Which the Buddha Abides Is Deep
Here the whole chapter turns into its deepest section. The Buddha's body and works are now clear, but in what kind of "place," after all, does the Buddha abide? — the uncontaminated dharma-realm. This realm is "profound"; the prose commentary cuts it open from three faces: the profundity of characteristic (what kind of thing it is), the profundity of place (whether it is one or many), and the profundity of work (what function it sets in motion).
The first of the profundity of characteristic — the characteristic of purity: it is clean of itself from the start, not something washed clean afterward
As before, so after; and free of all obstruction: not pure, not impure — this the Buddha calls suchness.
The purity of the dharma-realm is wondrous in that it is "not pure, not impure." To say it is "not pure" — because its own nature is undefiled from the start ("as before, so after": it is one and the same before and after, of itself pure from the start, not something bleached white afterward, and so it cannot be called a "purity" that has been "purified" into being); to say it is "not impure" — because the adventitious defilements have afterward departed (the obstructions being now removed, it cannot be called "dirty" either). Clean of itself, so it waits on no purifying; the adventitious defilements departable, so it bears not the name of stain: this is the dharma-realm's "characteristic of purity."
This paradox — "clean of itself yet defiled by adventitious defilements, defiled yet its native cleanness not lost" — the Treatise on the Ultimate One Vehicle, the Jewel-Nature sets forth most plainly with the simile of space: "As the pure mind, like space, is ever bright and without alteration, yet by false discrimination is defiled by adventitious afflictions" — the mind is like space, of itself ever bright, never once altered, only screened over by the "adventitious defilements" of false discrimination. It says again: "As in space the undefiled, pure sun and moon are covered over by dense thick clouds and by a spread of netting" — the sun and moon are of themselves pure, covered over by thick clouds and netting; and once the clouds are gone, "the sun, without cloud-veil and the rest, complete with undefiled qualities, appears — that very substance itself." One must feel the two sides of this simile: to say "not impure," because the cloud-veil (the adventitious defilement) is really and truly covering over, openable and departable, not a nothing; to say "not pure," because the cleanness of space, of sun and moon, is native — parting the clouds only makes manifest its native brightness, not adding a jot of purity to it. The adventitious defilement is a "guest," a covering and not the substance defiled; the native cleanness is the "host," a making-manifest and not a fresh gain — "not pure, not impure" falls exactly upon this dividing-line between space and cloud-veil.
The second of the profundity of characteristic — the characteristic of the great self: within no-self, there is a "great self"
Pure, empty, without self — the Buddha calls it the foremost self; the Buddhas' self being pure, therefore the Buddha is named the great self.
This verse is the most liable to misunderstanding, and must be acknowledged with care. The Buddha-dharma plainly says "no-self" — how then does a "great self" spring up? The key lies here: this uncontaminated realm takes the "foremost no-self" (第一無我) as its own nature — the so-called "foremost no-self" is that "pure suchness" (the true suchness made manifest once the falsely-grasped self has been utterly emptied); and this pure suchness is precisely the own-nature of the Buddhas' "self." Because this "self" of the Buddha most attains purity (with not a hair's-breadth of false grasping), it is called the "great self." One must distinguish: the ordinary being's "self" is a small self grasped up out of falsity; the Buddha's "great self" is precisely the pure suchness made manifest once the false self has been emptied to the end. Empty the false self, and only then is the great self seen — it is not that a self is set up apart from no-self, but that, no-self carried to the very end, that very substance is named the great self.
Here only a ready-made image is taken, to help the beginner cross this threshold of "emptied and yet set up" 〔this image is borrowed from another scripture, and helps open understanding; it is not that the present treatise cites it〕: the Scripture of Complete Awakening (圓覺經) says that when the eye has cataracts, it falsely sees flowers in the sky, and "as those sky-flowers cease within space, one cannot speak of a fixed place where they cease — why? because there is no place where they arose." The so-called "sky-flowers" are the false sight of the cataracted eye; in space there was originally no such flower. The cataract removed, the flower gone, it is not that one has gained another "true flower" apart; it is only to give space back its original cleanness, where flower there was none. The vanishing of the false self is likewise: to empty the falsely-grasped self is not to set up, apart from no-self, some "great self" as a thing freshly gained; the false self was from the start, like the sky-flower, without arising, and its vanishing only gives back to that native pure suchness its own suchness — and this suchness is named the "great self." With this image laid down first, "within no-self a great self is spoken" will not be heard as "first saying there is none, then slipping in an existent."
The third of the profundity of characteristic — the indeterminate characteristic: whether the Buddha-substance "is or is not," admits of no fixed answer
Not substance, not non-substance — thus is the Buddha-substance spoken; and so this discourse is made: it is fixedly an indeterminate dharma.
The Buddha-substance — to say it "is (substance)" is wrong, and to say it "is not (non-substance)" is wrong. Not substance — because the two characteristics, of person and of dharma, are unspeakable (no real substantial characteristic can be pointed to); not non-substance — because the characteristic of "suchness" really is (suchness is not sheer nothing). Just for this reason, the four propositions — "after death the Tathāgata is, is not, both is and is not, neither is nor is not" — are all "indeterminate" (not to be answered with fixity) — and this is the dharma-realm's "indeterminate characteristic." Why is it indeterminate? Because the moment one answers with fixity "is" or "is not," one drags suchness, which departs from the two extremes, back into the reckoning of is and is not. The Buddha's "not answering" here is not that he does not know; it is that this reality simply does not fall into these four propositions.
The fourth of the profundity of characteristic — the characteristic of liberation: like the heat withdrawn from iron, the cataract removed from the eye
As when the iron's heat is stilled, as when the eye's cataract is removed, so too the stilling of mind-and-wisdom — one speaks not of it as having or lacking substance.
What is the characteristic of liberation? Two similes near at hand: the red-hot iron, its heat withdrawn; the cataracted eye, its cataract removed. Of these two it may be said "not substance, not non-substance" — "not substance," because the heat and the cataract are now without characteristic (the thing to be removed is gone); "not non-substance," because the iron still is, the eye still is (the characteristic of the stilling still has substance). The liberation of the Buddha's mind-and-wisdom is likewise: taking "greed" as the heat and "ignorance" as the cataract, the two being once stilled — "not substance" (greed and ignorance are stilled), "not non-substance" (the liberation of mind and wisdom still is). The wonder of this simile: liberation is not extinguishing mind-and-wisdom entire (the iron and eye still are); it is withdrawing the heat and the cataract (greed and ignorance) — removing the disease, not removing the body.
The profundity of place — is this realm one, or is it many
The Buddhas' uncontaminated realm is not one, nor is it many; because it accords with the prior bodies, and because it is not a body, being like space.
The uncontaminated dharma-realm is "not one, nor many." Not one — because it "accords with the prior bodies" (differing with each Buddha's body on the ground of the cause, so that it cannot be spoken of as one rigid thing); not many — because its substance is "not a body," like space (space has no shape or matter to be cut apart, and so cannot be spoken of as many). Again space is borrowed: is space, would you say, one block? It pervades all things; is it, would you say, many blocks? It has no boundary to divide. The dharma-realm's being "not one, not many" is just like space, which cannot be counted.
The profundity of work — the eight great functions the pure dharma-realm sets in motion: the simile of eight "suns"
Below, in a string of eight verses, the prose commentary uses a series of sun-similes to draw out one by one the eight works (functions) that the uncontaminated dharma-realm sets in motion. It is one and the same "pure realm," yet its functioning has eight kinds; the wonder is that these eight similes mostly circle about "treasury, cloud, sun," advancing layer upon layer:
As a great treasure-store is the resting-place of all jewels, so too the pure realm is the support of the Buddha-dharmas.
① The work of being the support: the pure realm is like a great treasure-store, the resting-place of all the jewels of the factors of awakening — the powers, fearlessnesses, and the rest — a place where the myriad virtues find their lodging.
As the dense clouds spread out and pour down rain to ripen the hundred grains, so too the pure realm streams forth good and matures sentient beings.
② The work of maturing sentient beings: the pure realm is like the dense clouds sending down rain, moistening the hundred grains to ripeness; from the pure realm streams forth roots of good and matures sentient beings — virtue like rain, sentient beings like sprouts.
As the sun and moon at the full are bright, pure, their orbs complete, so too the pure realm is complete in the pure gatherings of good.
③ The work of reaching the ultimate: the pure realm is like the orb of the full moon, bright and pure, complete, causing the two gatherings of merit and of wisdom to become complete — virtue like the full moon, without a jot lacking.
As the sun's orb comes forth and its streaming light illumines all, so too the pure realm streams forth teaching and converts the flock of beings.
④ The work of teaching the true Dharma: the pure realm is like the sun's orb once risen, its streaming light illumining everywhere; from the pure realm streams forth the true Dharma and converts the flock of beings — the Dharma like sunlight, illumining without remainder.
As the sun's beams joined together illumine the world in a common work, so too the pure realm — the Buddhas joined, converting in a common deed.
⑤ The work of the transformations wrought: like many sunbeams joined together at one time in a common work (drying things, ripening things), many Buddhas and many wisdoms are joined at one time in a common deed (transformation and the rest) — many Buddhas in a common work, as many suns joined in brightness.
As the sunlight illumines without limit and all at once, so the Buddha-light of the pure realm illumines — these two things likewise.
⑥ The non-discriminating work: like sunlight illumining everywhere, without division and all at once (choosing out neither noble nor mean, dividing neither before nor after, illumining all together), the Buddha-light illumines everywhere likewise without limit and all at once — non-discriminating, as the sun chooses out no thing.
As the various sunbeams are said to have clouds and the like for veil, so the Buddha-wisdoms of the pure realm are said to have sentient beings' obstruction.
⑦ The non-acting work (at times not setting works in motion): like sunlight veiled by clouds so that it cannot illumine, the Buddha-light too is veiled by sentient beings' faults (the five turbidities), and so at times sets no work in motion — it is not that the sun has no light, but that clouds screen it; not that the Buddha does not convert, but that the obstruction is thick. This simile is of one loom with the earlier "the water-vessel broken, the moon appears not": the fault is on the side of sentient beings.
As by the force of the mordant-ash the garment is dyed all manner of colours, so by the pure realm's force of practice-and-vow, liberation attains all manner of wisdoms.
⑧ The work of the wisdom of liberation: to change the simile to a dyer's house — a garment dyed relies on the force of the "mordant-ash" (the dye-fixing agent); in some places it takes all manner of colours, in some places it does not. The pure realm of the three vehicles is likewise: the Buddhas, by the force of "practice-and-vow" (行願), attain all manner of wisdoms in liberation; but the two vehicles' liberation attains not these manifold wisdoms. It is one and the same "pure realm," yet by the depth or shallowness of the force of practice-and-vow, the wisdom accomplished differs as "manifold" or "not manifold" — as in the dyer's house, where colours are complete where the ash is and lacking where it is not.
The uncontaminated realm is profound in three: in characteristic, place, and work. Thus the Buddhas speak of it — as though one dyed or painted upon space.
This verse "brings out the foregoing meaning again," gathering up the above into a whole: the profundity of the uncontaminated realm is just these three classes — characteristic (the four characteristics of purity, the great self, the indeterminate, and liberation), place (not abiding as one or many), and work (the eight works above). The last, and finest, total simile: as though one dyed or painted upon space — this uncontaminated realm has no idle elaboration, like space; and our dividing it into departments and classes to "speak of its profundity" is just like dyeing colours upon space, painting pictures upon space. Where can space be dyed, be painted? — one may know that all speech and discrimination, upon this uncontaminated realm, are but "painting upon space," speaking with nothing spoken. This simile lightly gathers up all the foregoing "characteristic, place, and work": all are strokes painted upon space.
Because all are without distinction, and because the pure suchness is attained, therefore it is said that sentient beings are named the Tathāgata-womb.
At the end of this section, the text says that sentient beings are named the "Tathāgata-womb" (如來藏). The prose commentary explains the name from the verse's two clauses: "such" from "all are without distinction," and "Thus-Come" from "the pure suchness is attained"; on that basis it applies the name tathāgatagarbha to sentient beings. This exposition reports the name and the scope of the argument here. The passage does not establish that every reader already possesses the perfected fruit of buddhahood, does not decide the one-lineage/five-lineage dispute, and does not turn equality in suchness into an independent claim that Buddhas and sentient beings are one identical substance.
7. The Transformations of the Buddhas: How Vast, How Deep the Buddha's Manifesting Is, and Whence It Comes
The uncontaminated realm being now clear, the first great function the Buddha sets in motion from within this realm is "transformation" (變化, the manifesting of the emanation body). This section first expounds the "surpassingness" (foremost) of transformation and the "profundity" of transformation, then reckons in detail the eight "particular-turning transformations" — that is, the transformative functions attained by turning, one by one, some consciousness or some faculty — and at last gathers all up.
The śrāvaka and the pratyekabuddha, the bodhisattva and the Tathāgata: the first transformation drives back the worldly, and up to the Buddha it drives back the bodhisattva.
First it displays "surpassing transformation" (the Buddha's transformation is foremost): transformation has a sequence from low to high — the worldly transformation, the śrāvaka's transformation can surpass ("drive back," that is, overturn, surpass, and quell); the śrāvaka's, the pratyekabuddha can surpass; the pratyekabuddha's, the bodhisattva can surpass; the bodhisattva's, the Buddhas can surpass. And no one's transformation can surpass the Buddhas' transformation — so the Tathāgata's transformation reaches the very summit. Rank presses rank, up to the Buddha where it stops: one may see the "surpassingness" of the Buddha's transformation.
Thus the Buddha's transformations, immeasurable and inconceivable, in accord with person, with world, with time, manifest all manner of things.
Next it displays "profound transformation": the Buddha's transformation is profound, deep in two words — immeasurable, inconceivable. In accord with what capacity of person, with what world, with what season, according to their differences, it manifests all manner of things, now more, now fewer. Why "inconceivable"? Because it is not stamped out from a single fixed mould; it is manifested in accord with the capacity, changing in a thousand ways — and this is just what leads into the "eight particular-turnings" below: the immeasurableness of the Buddha's transformation is opened out precisely by the turning of the eight kinds of faculty-and-consciousness.
Below, in eight verses, the "particular-turning transformations" are expounded one by one — turning some faculty, some consciousness, and thereby attaining some kind of surpassing transformative function:
Thus the five faculties being turned, transformation attains surpassingness: the various meanings performed throughout, the qualities twelve hundred.
Turning the five faculties (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body): two kinds of surpassingness are attained — "the various meanings performed throughout" (each faculty can use all objects interchangeably, the eye able to do the ear's work and so on, faculty and faculty freely interpenetrating) and "the qualities twelve hundred" (each faculty severally attains twelve hundred kinds of quality). The ordinary being's faculties each manage their own and obstruct one another; the Buddha having turned them, faculty and faculty use one another without obstruction.
Thus the mind-faculty being turned, transformation attains surpassingness: utterly pure, non-discriminating, ever following transformation in its course.
Turning the mind-faculty (here referring to the defiled consciousness, that is, the seventh, manas): "the utterly pure non-conceptual knowledge" (無分別智) is attained, ever running along in common work with all transformation. The root of self-grasping, most defiled, being once turned, becomes the purest non-conceptual knowledge.
Thus meaning-and-sensation being turned, transformation attains surpassingness: the pure land as one wishes, and enjoyments all appearing before one.
Turning meaning-and-sensation ("meaning" refers to the five sense-objects, "sensation" to the five consciousnesses): by this one turning, the buddha-field is pure, the things one wishes appear before one, enjoyed at will — the sovereign enjoyment of the pure land is accomplished from this.
Thus discrimination being turned, transformation attains surpassingness: the works performed by the wisdoms proceed at all times without obstruction.
Turning discrimination (referring to the sixth mind-consciousness): by this one turning, the transformations performed by the wisdoms proceed at all times without any obstruction — the mind-consciousness, most given to discriminating and reckoning, is turned into unobstructed skill.
Thus the establishing being turned, transformation attains surpassingness: abiding in the Buddha's unmoving phrase, yet not abiding in nirvāṇa.
Turning the establishing (referring to the receptacle-world): by this one turning, one abides in the Buddha's "unmoving" uncontaminated dharma-realm, yet "does not enter nirvāṇa" (does not take up quiescent cessation), ever setting surpassing transformation in motion — abiding unmoving and yet not forsaking the delivering of beings.
Thus the defilement of desire being turned, transformation attains surpassingness: abiding in the Buddha's unsurpassed bliss, manifesting a wife yet undefiled.
Turning the defilement of desire: by this one turning, two transformations are attained — one, abiding in the Buddha's "unsurpassed bliss"; two, "undefiled amid a wife" (though manifesting a household with a wife, the mind is without defiled attachment). The defilement of the desire of affliction is turned into the unsurpassed bliss of Dharma, manifesting the worldly aspect yet not stained by it.
Thus the notion of space being turned, transformation attains surpassingness: all attained as one wishes, and wherever one goes, nothing hindering.
Turning the notion of space: by this one turning, two transformations are attained — "all that one wishes attained" (attaining the "space-treasury," and so all wishes fulfilled) and "wherever one goes, nothing hindering" (attaining the "space-release," and so the places one goes are without obstruction).
Thus, by immeasurable turnings, come immeasurable transformations; the inconceivable works of all the Buddhas rest upon the undefiled.
The last verse gathers all up: by immeasurable "turnings," immeasurable "transformations" are attained — and all these inconceivable works of the Buddhas rest, one and all, upon "the uncontaminated dharma-realm (the undefiled)." Having expounded the eight particular-turnings, here it gathers them in: the turnings, though immeasurable, are basically one realm only. All the transformations stream forth from that one uncontaminated dharma-realm.
8. The Buddhas Maturing Sentient Beings: How the Buddha "Rears" Sentient Beings to Buddhahood
The Buddha's transformation being now vast, the aim of transformation is "maturing sentient beings." This section expounds specifically the manifold "causes" (gateways, modes) by which the Buddha matures sentient beings, in a string of three sets of similes — sun, lamp, and sea.
Causing to gather, and causing to grow; causing to ripen, and causing to be freed; ripening and ripening, without remainder — for the world is without end.
First, the "cause of maturing in sequence": maturing has its sequence — those who have not gathered roots of good are caused to gather them, those who have gathered are caused to increase, those who have grown are caused to ripen, those who have ripened are caused to be freed, until the utmost purity is reached. The wonder is in the latter two lines: "ripening and again ripening, yet not entering the final nirvāṇa" — why? Because the world is without end — sentient beings cannot be delivered to the last, and so the Buddha never rests his hand. This one line expounds the Buddha's compassion to its very floor: it is not that, having delivered them all, he departs; it is that, sentient beings being endless, the delivering too is endless.
The hard-to-attain now fully attained, everywhere a refuge for beings — rare, and yet not rare, by reason of attaining the good skillful means.
Setting forth the "characteristic of the not-rare" (the practice of the bodhisattva already matured): the highest quality of unsurpassed awakening was from the start "never-before-had," hard to attain; now, fully possessed and corresponding, one can ever be a refuge for beings in the worlds of the ten directions. To mature sentient beings everywhere thus is "rare"; yet it may be called "not rare" — why? Because the good skillful means has been attained. The so-called good skillful means is "the way that accords with capacity," which is pure practice. The wonder is in this "rare and yet not rare": in the eyes of sentient beings it is wondrous and hard to attain; but on the Buddha's part it is accomplished by letting things run their course (the good skillful means once attained, it is as everyday as home life), taken as nothing wondrous.
Turning the Dharma and the Dharma's passing, attaining the path and nirvāṇa — everywhere skillful means arise, while the true dharma-realm does not move.
Setting forth the "cause of universal maturing": in "a single instant," the Buddha can, here manifest the turning of the Dharma-wheel, there manifest the passing-away of the true Dharma, in one place manifest the attaining of awakening, in another place manifest the entering of nirvāṇa — in the same instant, differently manifested in the eight directions, only because sentient beings' capacities differ. Yet the marvel is the last line: setting skillful means in motion everywhere thus, yet upon the uncontaminated dharma-realm never once moving. What moves is the manifesting in accord with capacity; what does not move is the dharma-realm rested upon — again "the aspect moves while the substance does not move" (of one vein with the earlier "resting on space the works are unbroken").
Raising no discriminating thought, maturing the past, future, and present, everywhere converting sentient beings, ever manifesting the three gateways.
Setting forth the "cause of spontaneous maturing": the Buddhas never raise such a thought as — "I have delivered, I shall deliver, I now deliver sentient beings." Why? Because of non-discrimination (the Buddha, in delivering beings, keeps no thought of a deliverer and a delivered). Though effortless, yet at all times, with roots of good, he matures sentient beings throughout the worlds of the ten directions by the "three gateways" (the teaching-gateways of the three vehicles). The wonder is that "raising no discriminating thought" and yet "maturing past, future, and present": to convert without mind is precisely to convert to the very end — keep one thought of "I am delivering beings," and one falls into effort; without this one thought, the converting pervades the three times.
As the sun's light of itself illumines, breaks the dark and ripens the hundred grains, so too the Dharma-sun's light extinguishes affliction and matures sentient beings.
Illustrating by simile the sense of "spontaneous": like the sun's orb, spending no toil, of itself giving forth light, everywhere breaking the dark and ripening the hundred grains; the Buddha too is so — though effortless, with the light of the "Dharma-sun" he everywhere extinguishes affliction and matures sentient beings. "Effortlessly accomplishing a great work" — the sun is the best model: when did the sun ever set the mind to illumine someone, to ripen someone? It illumines everywhere of itself, and the hundred grains ripen of themselves.
One lamp lights the many lamps, the great gathering of brightness inexhaustible; one matured converts many to maturity, the converting too inexhaustible.
The "cause of maturing in continuation" uses the lamp simile: one lamp goes to light the many lamps, kindling them into a great gathering of lamps, immeasurable and numberless, yet the brightness of that one lamp is not diminished by being shared out. The Buddha too is so: one Buddha matures sentient beings, converting many to maturity, forming a great gathering of sentient beings, yet the power of that converting is without end. The wonder is in "one lamp inexhaustible": plainly transmitted everywhere, yet undiminished in itself — the Buddha's virtue shared out to immeasurable sentient beings, yet its own substance unimpaired.
The vast sea takes in the many streams, without surfeit and without overflow; the Buddha-realm gathers in the many goods, neither filled nor increased.
The "cause of maturing without surfeit" uses the sea simile: the vast sea broadly takes in the hundred rivers, with neither "surfeit" (never sated with more) nor "overflow" (never brimming with fullness), because it can receive and hold. The Buddha-realm too is so: ever gathering in immeasurable pure roots of good, yet "neither filled nor increased" (never, by gathering in much, becoming "full" or "increased"), because the Buddha's virtue is rare, not to be measured by fullness or increase from the start. The sea takes in the hundred rivers and does not overflow; the Buddha gathers in the many goods and is not filled — its measure so vast that there is no "fullness" to speak of.
9. The Purity of the Buddhas' Dharma-Realm: From Nature, Cause, Work, and Position, Looking Again at This Pure Realm
This short section, following on from the uncontaminated dharma-realm above, changes the angle and, from the four senses of nature, cause, work, and position, points out "the purity of the dharma-realm" once more, leading into the three bodies of the following text.
The two obstructions now forever removed, the dharma of suchness attains purity; over things and the wisdom that cognizes them, sovereign and inexhaustible too.
The "nature" sense of the dharma-realm: the characteristic of purity — the two obstructions of affliction and of the cognitive are both forever exhausted (the dharma of suchness attains purity); the characteristic of sovereignty — over both "things" and "the wisdom that takes them as object" it attains sovereignty, forever inexhaustible. Nature is just its native aspect of "pure and sovereign."
The wisdom of suchness in all modes, the cause of cultivating the pure dharma-realm; benefiting and gladdening, converting sentient beings — this fruit too is inexhaustible.
The "cause" sense of the dharma-realm: to make the dharma-realm pure, one cultivates at all times "the wisdom of the gateway of suchness in all modes" as the cause; to convert sentient beings, one bestows at all times the two fruits of "benefit and gladness" upon sentient beings, ever inexhaustible. Cultivating the wisdom of suchness is the cause, benefiting and gladdening sentient beings is the fruit — cause and fruit both "inexhaustible."
Setting in motion body, speech, and mind, the three works ever converting; the two gateways and the two gatherings, the skillful means all complete.
The "work" sense of the dharma-realm: setting in motion the three works of body, speech, and mind, at all times converting sentient beings; with the "two gateways" (the gateway of concentration, the gateway of dhāraṇī) and the "two gatherings" (the gathering of merit, the gathering of wisdom) as skillful means, all made complete. Work is just its function of "the three works converting beings, the two gateways and two gatherings as its instruments."
The self-nature and the Dharma-enjoyment and the transformation — the difference of positions; this by the purity of the dharma-realm, so the Buddhas have spoken.
The "position" sense of the dharma-realm: the self-nature body, the enjoyment body (受用身), and the emanation body — this is the difference of "positions"; and that these three positions can be established is entirely by "the purity of the dharma-realm" — were the dharma-realm not pure, these positions of the three bodies would not stand. This verse is a bridge: from "the purity of the dharma-realm" it directly draws out the "three bodies" below — the three bodies are precisely the three positional differences of the pure dharma-realm.
10. The Three Bodies of the Buddhas: Dharma, Enjoyment, and Transformation — One Root and Two Dependents
Following on from the "position" sense above, this section expounds specifically the "three bodies." First it establishes the three bodies and discerns their support and characteristic, then expounds the twofold benefit, the constancy, and the equality of the three bodies.
The self-nature body and the enjoyment body and the emanation body — joined, the three bodies; it should be known that the first body is the support of the other two.
Every Buddha has three bodies: the self-nature body (自性身, established by the "characteristic of the transformation of the basis" — the very substance of the pure dharma-realm); the enjoyment body (食身, which in the great assembly performs the "Dharma-food," nourishing the holy multitude with Dharma); and the emanation body (化身, which performs the benefit of the sentient beings to be converted). The one line that matters: the self-nature body is the support of the enjoyment body and the emanation body — it is the "root." One root (the self-nature body) and two branches (enjoyment and emanation); the two bodies both arise from the self-nature body.
The enjoyment body, in the various realms, has differences of enjoyment: the lands, the names, the bodies, the works — all being different.
Speaking of the "enjoyment body" alone: in all worlds, its retinues, buddha-fields, names, bodies, and works — these matters of enjoyment are each and all different. Why must the enjoyment body "have differences"? Because it is manifested for the bodhisattvas on the grounds to enjoy the bliss of Dharma, and so differs with realm and with multitude.
The equal, subtle body, joined with the enjoyment body: it should be known that the enjoyment body is the cause of the emanation body.
Ordering the relation of the three bodies one layer more: "equal" refers to the self-nature body (all Buddhas equal and without distinction); "subtle" (this body being hard to know); "the enjoyment body (食身) joined with the equal body" (arising in dependence on the self-nature body); and the enjoyment body is in turn the cause of the emanation body (in accord with the enjoyment desired, it manifests everything, and the emanation body comes forth from this). A single chain of dependent arising: self-nature body (equal) → enjoyment body → emanation body.
The emanation-Buddha's immeasurable emanations — therefore it is named the emanation body; the two bodies and the two benefits accomplished, established in all modes.
Speaking of the "emanation body" alone: the emanation-Buddha at all times emanates immeasurable differing forms, and so it is named the "emanation body." Further pointing out the "two bodies and two benefits": the "two bodies" are the enjoyment body and the emanation body; the "two benefits" are self-benefit and others'-benefit — the enjoyment body has "the accomplishing of self-benefit" for its characteristic, the emanation body has "the accomplishing of others'-benefit" for its characteristic; the two benefits both accomplished in all modes, the two bodies of enjoyment and emanation are accordingly established.
The crafts and the taking of birth, the attaining of the path and the final nirvāṇa — displaying these great skillful means, causing others to attain liberation.
The "others'-benefit" characteristic of the emanation body, spread out to view: the emanation body at all times converts sentient beings, now manifesting crafts (skills and arts), now manifesting the taking of birth, now manifesting the attaining of awakening, now manifesting the final nirvāṇa — displaying all manner of great skillful means, all causing sentient beings to attain liberation. Śākyamuni's manifesting of a whole lifetime (descent to birth, attaining the path, nirvāṇa) is precisely the look of this "emanation body's others'-benefit."
It should be known that the Buddha's three bodies gather in every Buddha-body, the support of self-benefit and others'-benefit — all manifested as the three bodies.
Gathering it in one line: these three bodies gather in every one of all the Buddhas' bodies, for they manifest the support of "self-benefit and others'-benefit" entire — though Buddha-bodies be myriad, they go not beyond these three.
By reason of the basis, the mind, and the work, the three Buddhas are alike equal; by self-nature, by the unbroken, by the continuous, the three Buddhas are alike ever-abiding.
Last, the "equality" and the "ever-abiding" of the three bodies. Equality: by reason of the "basis," the self-nature body is equal (the dharma-realm without distinction); by reason of the "mind," the enjoyment body is equal (the Buddha-mind without distinction); by reason of the "work," the emanation body is equal (one and the same performing). Ever-abiding: by reason of "essential constancy," the self-nature body is ever-abiding (uncontaminated to the very last); by reason of "unbroken constancy," the enjoyment body is ever-abiding (the teaching of Dharma without cease); by reason of "continuous constancy," the emanation body is ever-abiding (though hidden here, it appears again there). The wonder is the "ever-abiding" of the emanation body: the emanation body plainly has arising and ceasing — how too is it "ever-abiding"? — because of "continuous constancy": hidden in this place, it appears again in that, like lamp succeeding lamp, the brightness unbroken. Each of the three bodies has its own "constancy," and joined they make the Buddha's constant presence. This verse weighs heavily with the ancient masters: Taehyŏn, in his Record of Study on the Cheng Weishi Lun, in treating the constancy of the Buddha-body, cites in full "the self-nature the unbroken and the continuous — the three Buddhas alike ever-abiding" as clear proof 〔the Record's citation gives its last two graphs as "in the hall," a variant of transmission〕 — the sense of the Buddha-body's ever-abiding, the ancient masters took this very verse of this chapter for its ground.
11. The Wisdom of the Buddhas: Transforming the Eight Consciousnesses into the Four Wisdoms, Gathering the Four Wisdoms to Furnish the Three Bodies (the Eye of the Whole Chapter)
Having reached this point, the Buddha's body has been expounded, and the prose commentary says: "The bodies of the Buddhas being now expounded, next are expounded the wisdoms of the Buddhas." — this is the very pupil of the eye that Li Baiyao's preface singled out: transforming consciousness into wisdom, the four wisdoms and the three bodies. What the "wisdom" of Buddhahood is, how it is "turned" out of the ordinary being's eight consciousnesses, and how it is matched, in turn, with the three bodies above.
The chapter explicitly says that the eighth, seventh, sixth, and first five consciousnesses are “turned in sequence and attained” as the four wisdoms. This verse does not itself decide that consciousness and wisdom are one identical substance or that the wisdom-nature of the eight consciousnesses is innately complete. The exposition therefore reports the sequence without using ice-and-water or cloud-and-sun images to prove identity or innateness.
〔cross-text borrowed simile〕The Ratnagotravibhāga offers the images of true gold in filth and a gold image wrapped in rags. They may be compared as an account of removing defilement and revealing gold, but they belong to another treatise and are not evidence that this chapter teaches identity of consciousness and wisdom or innate wisdom.
The general statement: the eight consciousnesses turned into the four wisdoms
The four wisdoms — the mirror unmoving — the support of the three wisdoms; the eighth, seventh, sixth, and fifth consciousnesses, being turned in sequence, are attained.
Every Buddha has four kinds of wisdom: first, the mirror wisdom (鏡智, that is, the great perfect mirror wisdom); second, the equality wisdom (平等智, the wisdom of the equal nature); third, the observing wisdom (觀智, the wisdom of wondrous observing); fourth, the accomplishing wisdom (作事智, the wisdom that accomplishes what is to be done).
- "The mirror unmoving, the support of the three wisdoms" — the mirror wisdom has "unmoving" for its characteristic, and ever serves as the support of the other three wisdoms. Why? Because those three wisdoms are "moving" (arising in function in accord with capacities and conditions), while the mirror wisdom is suchness-like and unmoving, the root of the other three.
- “The eighth, seventh, sixth, and first five consciousnesses, being turned in sequence, are attained” — the chapter pairs them in order: turning the eighth store consciousness attains mirror wisdom; turning the seventh manas attains equality wisdom; turning the sixth mind-consciousness attains observing wisdom; turning the first five attains accomplishing wisdom. The exposition reports this pairing without adding that affliction itself is awakening.
The mirror wisdom: turning the eighth consciousness, whence the myriad images appear
The mirror wisdom takes objects without division, continuous and ever unbroken, not deluded as to all that is known, yet the characteristics appear not before it.
This displays "turning the eighth consciousness to attain the mirror wisdom," and expounds line by line its four qualities: it takes objects without division (taking all objects without cutting them into portions, illumining with one even flavour); continuous and ever unbroken (proceeding at all times, never once cut off); not deluded as to all that is known (the obstruction to all objects forever cut, nothing not comprehended); the characteristics appear not before it (it illumines all objects yet departs from coarse manifest characteristic-aspects, illumining without grasping).
The mirror wisdom is the cause of all wisdoms, called the great store of wisdom; the other bodies and the other wisdoms — their images appear arising from this.
This displays the "function" of the mirror wisdom, pointing out its root position among the four wisdoms: the equality wisdom and the rest, all the other wisdoms, have the mirror wisdom in all their modes for their cause, and so the mirror wisdom is like a "great treasure-store" — the myriad virtues come forth from within it. Not the wisdoms only: even the Buddha's "other bodies" (the enjoyment body and the rest) and "other wisdoms" (the equality wisdom and the rest) — their images too arise from within this mirror wisdom. Herein lies the source of the name "mirror wisdom": precisely because the images of the myriad bodies and myriad wisdoms all arise from it, like images in a mirror — manifesting all while its own substance does not move — the Buddha names this wisdom the "mirror wisdom." One may gather all four qualities of the prior verse onto this one mirror: the mirror illumines things without choosing great or small, without cutting them into blocks — this is "taking objects without division"; the mirror is ever bright and unextinguished — this is "continuous and ever unbroken"; the mirror illumines all, every fine hair fully shown — this is "not deluded as to all that is known"; the mirror manifests images yet does not stick to the images, not welcoming the coming image nor detaining the going — this is "the characteristics appear not before it." A single mirror, and the four senses are complete in it.
This virtue of the mirror — "manifesting all while its own substance does not move" — the various scriptures have each their saying of it, that may be read across with this wisdom. The Laṅkāvatāra Scripture says: "As a bright mirror all at once manifests all the imageless form-images" — a single mirror manifests the myriad forms all at once, yet chooses out no sequence and detains no characteristic-aspect, precisely that one flavour of "the characteristics appear not before it" and yet "taking objects without division." The Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna speaks of the mirror-virtue of the "substance of awakening" more finely still, listing it as four mirrors, of which it says the "truly-real, not-empty" mirror: "all the objects of the world manifest within it, neither coming forth nor entering, neither lost nor destroyed, ever abiding as the one mind" — the myriad objects manifest within the mirror, yet the mirror does not "enter" because an image comes, does not "lose" because an image goes, and so the mirror-substance does not turn with the images. That the mirror wisdom is the support of the myriad wisdoms, the "great treasure-store," lies just in these eight graphs, "neither coming forth nor entering, neither lost nor destroyed" — illumining without sticking, manifesting without moving.
The equality wisdom: turning the seventh consciousness, self-grasping turned into great compassion
The wisdom of the equality of sentient beings, cultivated pure, realizing awakening, abiding not in nirvāṇa, because there is no final end.
This displays "turning the seventh consciousness to attain the equality wisdom." The seventh, the manas, is that consciousness which ever grasps the eighth as a "self" — the old nest of self-grasping; turned over, it becomes precisely the wisdom "equal toward all sentient beings." At the very moment when the realization of dharma is present, one attains the wisdom that regards all sentient beings as equal; and cultivating to the utmost purity, one realizes unsurpassed awakening. And "abiding not in nirvāṇa" — because sentient beings are without end, and the work of delivering beings has no terminus; and just because there is no terminus, the Buddha does not abide in nirvāṇa, but ever delivers beings within birth-and-death. Abiding not in nirvāṇa is not that one cannot attain nirvāṇa; it is that the compassionate heart is too great to be willing to rest alone. This one turning may be felt through two images: the manas grasping a "self" is like raising a wall between oneself and others — within the wall is "self," outside the wall is "other"; the wall once torn down, inner and outer become one stretch, and looking again at sentient beings, they are not two from oneself — this is "equality"; with no more partition of inner and outer, sentient beings' joy and pain become as one's own joy and pain, and great compassion wells up of itself, not to be dammed. Again, it is like a loving mother who, though she herself have already climbed to the safe shore, seeing her child still trapped in peril, could by no means rest alone, but must wade in time and again to save it — the Buddha's "abiding not in nirvāṇa" is just such a compassionate heart.
Great loving-kindness and great compassion, these two ever without break; if sentient beings but have faith, the Buddha's image at once appears.
This displays the "function" of the equality wisdom: great loving-kindness and great compassion are ever unbroken, the Buddhas at all times following and guarding sentient beings. "So long as sentient beings but have faith, the Buddha's form appears before them" — the Buddha manifests in accord with what sentient beings have faith in: some see the Tathāgata blue in colour, some see him yellow, each in accord with his faith and answering thereto. Here the prose commentary gathers a line that matters: the foregoing two wisdoms, the mirror wisdom and the equality wisdom, these "prior two wisdoms," are the Dharma-body.
The observing wisdom: turning the sixth consciousness, discrimination turned into wondrous observing
The observing wisdom, as to the known and the cognizer, is at all times without obstruction; this wisdom is like a great store, the support of the dhāraṇīs and samādhis.
This displays "turning the sixth consciousness to attain the observing wisdom." The sixth mind-consciousness is originally the consciousness most given to discriminating and reckoning; turned over, it becomes precisely "wondrous observing" — the force of discrimination is no longer put to false grasping, but becomes unobstructed and skillful observing illumination. The observing wisdom, as to all that is known, all objects, is ever without obstruction, like a great treasure-store, the support of all "dhāraṇī gateways" (総持 — the power to gather and hold in memory all the meanings of the Dharma) and all "samādhi gateways" (all manner of right concentration); because these two classes of gateway both arise from the observing wisdom.
Ever in the great assembly, manifesting all manner of things, able to cut off the nets of doubt, for it rains down the great rain of Dharma.
This displays the "function" of the observing wisdom: the observing wisdom is ever in the great assembly of the Dharma-gathering, manifesting all manner of things, able to cut off entirely sentient beings' nets of doubt and to send down the great rain of Dharma — teaching Dharma and delivering beings, resolving doubt and loosening perplexity, is precisely the office of the wisdom of wondrous observing. The prose commentary gathers another line, matching it to a body: this observing wisdom is the "enjoyment body" (the body of enjoyment).
The accomplishing wisdom: turning the prior five consciousnesses, becoming all manner of transformative works
The accomplishing wisdom, in the various realms, sets in motion all manner of transformative works, immeasurable and inconceivable, for the sake of benefiting the flock of beings.
This displays "turning the prior five consciousnesses to attain the accomplishing wisdom." The prior five consciousnesses are originally the consciousnesses that discriminate the five sense-objects; turned over, they become the wisdom that can, in all worlds, set in motion all manner of transformative works — setting in motion all manner of transformative works, immeasurable and boundless, inconceivable, and all these works are for the sake of benefiting all sentient beings. The prose commentary gathers a line, matching it to a body: this accomplishing wisdom is the "emanation body."
The four wisdoms furnishing the three bodies: gathering the four wisdoms to accomplish the three bodies
Having reached this point, the four wisdoms have each been expounded severally, and along with each wisdom the prose commentary has pointed out the body it accomplishes. Gathering them together is precisely what the preface calls "gathering the four wisdoms to furnish the three bodies": the mirror wisdom and the equality wisdom → the Dharma-body (the prior two wisdoms are the Dharma-body); the observing wisdom → the enjoyment body; the accomplishing wisdom → the emanation body.
Gathering-and-holding, and the even mind; the opening of the Dharma, and the accomplishing of works — thus, by reason of the four senses, the four wisdoms arise in sequence.
The last verse gathers the arising of the four wisdoms into a single sequence, four senses matched to four wisdoms in orderly array: "gathering-and-holding" (the total gathering-in of the Dharma heard — this is the mirror wisdom); "the even mind" (attaining, toward all sentient beings, the equality of self and other — this is the equality wisdom); "the opening of the Dharma" (setting forth the true Dharma, resolving doubt and teaching Dharma — this is the observing wisdom); "the accomplishing of works" (setting in motion all manner of transformative works — this is the accomplishing wisdom) — by reason of these four senses, the four wisdoms arise in sequence. One root (the mirror wisdom) and three functions (equality, observing, accomplishing), gathered into three bodies, and the wisdom and the body of Buddhahood are thereupon complete and whole.
〔exposition-borrowed simile〕For an initial reading, one moon over a thousand rivers may illustrate the relation of “one” and “three”: the single moon figures the Dharma-body, its light the enjoyment body, and its reflections in many waters the emanation body. This is only an expository aid. It is not a simile cited by the treatise and does not independently prove the doctrine of the three bodies; the doctrinal ground remains the verse and prose commentary quoted above.
〔One matter to make plain, left for those minded to inquire deeply: "the four wisdoms matched to the three bodies" — the present treatise, in this chapter, matches them thus (the mirror wisdom and the equality wisdom as the Dharma-body, the observing wisdom as the enjoyment body, the accomplishing wisdom as the emanation body). By the later Cien lineage (Kuiji's Forest of Meanings, the Cheng Weishi Lun), the matching is somewhat different — there it is "the wisdom of the equal nature and the wisdom of wondrous observing as the enjoyment body, the great perfect mirror wisdom as the self-nature body." This is a stretch of shift, within the lineage, in the account of matching the bodies, from the early (the Ornament) to the culmination (the Cheng Weishi Lun). Both accounts the ancient masters transmit together; this exposition expounds according to the present treatise and this chapter, and that difference the 〈Textual Apparatus〉 records side by side without adjudicating — the scholar may inquire for himself.〕
12. The Buddhas Neither One nor Many: Is the Buddha One, or Many
The four wisdoms being expounded, the prose commentary incidentally resolves a question that easily catches one up: is the Buddha, after all, "one" or "many"? — the answer: not one, nor yet many.
Difference of nature, and the not-in-vain, the all and the beginningless too; without distinction, therefore not one; on the same support, therefore not many.
The Buddha is "not one" (not one alone) on the strength of five senses: difference of nature (the natures of the boundless Buddhas are each distinct; were there but one Buddha, there would yet be bodhisattvas "to attain awakening in time to come" — a contradiction); the not-in-vain (were the gathering of merit and wisdom in vain and without real effect, then other bodhisattvas ought not to attain awakening; the two gatherings being not in vain, one may see there is more than one Buddha); the all (were there but one Buddha, that Buddha could not benefit all sentient beings; the Buddha having accomplished all sentient beings' becoming Buddhas, one may see there is more than one); the beginningless (were there but a single first Buddha, he should have become a Buddha without having gathered the two gatherings — which does not hold); without distinction (were there another Buddha who became a Buddha without gathering the two gatherings — which does not hold). The Buddha is "not many" (not a scatter of many substances) on the strength of one sense: the same support — the Dharma-body of all the Buddhas rests upon one and the same uncontaminated realm. In a word: seen from "each Buddha having his own ground of the cause," the Buddhas are more than one; seen from "the Dharma-body resting on one and the same uncontaminated realm," the Buddhas are yet not a set of many unrelated ones. Not one, not many, is precisely the Buddha's true state.
13. The Skillful Means of Entering Buddhahood: How One May Walk into This Fruit of Buddhahood
Buddhahood (body, wisdom, realm) being now clear, the most urgent question comes: how may the ordinary being enter this fruit of Buddhahood? This section gives "the skillful means of entering Buddhahood" — four verses, pressing out, layer by layer, a single road of "non-discrimination."
If discrimination ever is, the real is forever not; if discrimination is forever not, the real ever is.
First it establishes an iron rule of the one waxing as the other wanes: "discrimination" (false reckoning) and "the real" (suchness) are irreconcilably opposed — if discrimination ever abides, the real can never be attained; if discrimination is exhausted, the real is ever present. To enter the fruit of Buddhahood, one must first see clearly: what stands before the real is precisely this "discrimination."
Would one cultivate the supreme cultivation, one sees not any cultivation; would one attain the supreme attainment, one sees not any attainment.
A layer deeper: what is "the supreme cultivation"? — seeing no "cultivation" to be cultivated (the characteristic-less of cultivation); what is "the supreme attainment"? — seeing no "attainment" to be attained (the characteristic-less of attainment). Keep one characteristic of "I am cultivating, I have attained," and one falls into discrimination, and it is no longer the supreme. The supreme cultivation-and-realization is precisely cultivating without a characteristic of cultivation, attaining without a characteristic of attainment.
With reverence and over long time, contemplating the Buddha's never-before-had dharmas, and by reason of this to attain Buddhahood swiftly — this is far from the Buddha's awakening.
The next verse sounds an alarm: there is a bodhisattva who conceives the utmost reverence for the Buddha, and over long time diligently contemplates the Buddha's never-before-had dharmas, yet, by reason of this contemplating mind and this diligence, raises the one thought "I shall swiftly attain unsurpassed awakening" — such a bodhisattva is on the contrary very far from the Buddha's awakening. Why? Because he has "conceit" (a hidden self-conceit of "I shall swiftly attain"). This one line strikes right at the heart of the matter: even a good like "revering the Buddha, diligent over long time," once it carries the self-characteristic of "I shall swiftly attain," becomes an obstruction that puts one far from the Buddha — one may see how hard "discrimination and self-conceit" are to remove.
Contemplating dharmas as only discrimination — this sense, as known before — the bodhisattva without discrimination, of him it is said he swiftly becomes a Buddha.
The last verse gives the right road: if a bodhisattva contemplates "all dharmas as only discrimination" (the sense as known before), and further contemplates "that discriminating mind too as without discrimination," he attains entry into "the position of the forbearance of the unarisen," and by this it is said he attains awakening. A single road: first contemplate dharmas as only discrimination (breaking the grasped-object), then contemplate discrimination too as without discrimination (breaking the grasping-subject); grasped and grasping both dissolved, and this is the right skillful means of "swiftly becoming a Buddha." The prior verse: "would one attain swiftly, one is on the contrary far"; this verse: "without discrimination, one is on the contrary swift" — front and back illumining each other, the whole eye of "the skillful means of entering Buddhahood" lies in these three words, "without discrimination."
14. The Buddhas' Common Deed: Bodhisattvas Are Each Distinct; Once Entered the Buddha-Substance, They Are of One Flavour
Once one has entered the fruit of Buddhahood, what is the relation among the Buddhas? — this section, with an excellent river-and-sea simile, expounds that the Buddhas are "of one substance and function."
It should be known that the various river-waters have their separate supports and separate deeds, the water little, the creatures' enjoyment little, because they have not yet entered the great sea. All having entered the great sea, one support and one deed, the water great, the creatures' enjoyment great, and ever, moreover, without end. So too the various separate understandings, separate intents and separate works, the understanding little, the benefit little, because they have not yet entered the Buddha-substance. All having entered the Buddha-substance, one understanding and one intent, the understanding great, the benefit great, the utmost gathering too without end.
The simile falls into two halves, matched with the utmost neatness: before entering the sea — the rivers each have their own riverbed (separate supports), each perform their own deeds (separate deeds), the water scant, and the creatures within the water enjoying scantly too, because "they have not yet entered the great sea together." The bodhisattvas are likewise: before entering the Buddha-substance, understanding is severally distinct (separate understandings), intent is severally distinct (separate intents), works are severally distinct (separate works), understanding little and benefiting sentient beings little. Once entered the sea — the many waters share one seabed (one support), one sea-substance, the water becomes one, the deeds too become one, the water vast, the water-creatures' enjoyment great, and ever, moreover, without end. The bodhisattvas are likewise: once entered the Buddha-substance together, they share one intent (one intent), one understanding (one understanding), works become one, benefit vast, reaching even to pervade the whole gathering of all sentient beings without end. The wonder is in this "the hundred streams entering the sea are then of one flavour": the Buddhas are not a set of many substances each holding their own quarter; they are, having entered one Buddha-substance together, of "one understanding and one intent" — so the "not many" said earlier has its ground precisely here. The many waters entering the sea are no more parted into this and that; the many bodhisattvas entering the Buddha-substance are of one and the same sea of wisdom.
Conclusion: Urging Toward and Longing to Seek — Such a Fruit of Buddhahood, the Wise Should Go and Seek
At the very last of the chapter, the prose commentary closes with a single verse urging the arousing of the mind of awakening — turning the fruit of Buddhahood, which the foregoing has expounded to the full, into one line: "you too should go and seek it."
The peerless, perfect white dharmas, the cause of sentient beings' benefit and gladness, the blissful abode, the inexhaustible store — the wise should seek and arouse.
Gathering the three faces of the fruit of Buddhahood into three lines: the peerless, perfect white dharmas (the Buddha's accomplishing of self-benefit — the myriad virtues complete, beyond compare); the cause of sentient beings' benefit and gladness (the Buddha's accomplishing of others'-benefit — the root of all sentient beings' benefit and gladness); the blissful abode, the inexhaustible store (the Buddha's roots of good, without fault and unsurpassed, an "inexhaustible store of bliss" not to be drawn dry). And so the last line urges outright: the person of wisdom should arouse the great mind of awakening in order to seek this most excellent fruit of buddhahood. The foregoing chapter discusses the cause, fruit, body, wisdom, realm, and works of buddhahood, and its final "the wise should seek and arouse" closes by exhorting seeking and arousal, not by claiming that the reader already possesses the perfected fruit. "The Awakening Chapter is completed"; its concluding address to the learner is to arouse the mind for the sake of seeking buddhahood.
Conclusion: The Single Thread of the Whole Chapter
Take this chapter joined together, and the Awakening Chapter is a complete picture of Buddhahood, section clasping section:
First it expounds the completeness of cause and fruit (hardship, good, time, and obstruction all exhausted, as the great chest opened and the jewels appearing) → then the Buddha-body free of the two extremes (the white dharmas as body, like a treasury and like a cloud) → then the unsurpassed refuge (saving from the three defilements, surpassing in cause and great, the last place of return for sentient beings) → then the Tathāgata's transformation of the basis (cutting the two obstructions, attaining the two paths, unmoving as the king of mountains; the Buddha-substance pervading sentient beings as space pervades forms, pervading yet unseen as the water-vessel broken and the moon appearing not, coming forth and passing away as the mass of fire) → then the works effortless (the wish-fulfilling jewel and the heavenly drum, accomplished without mind) → then the profundity of the uncontaminated dharma-realm (profound in characteristic, place, and work; the eight works as eight suns; the speaking of it as painting upon space; sentient beings are named the Tathāgata-womb) → then the transformations of the Buddhas (transformation most surpassing, most profound; the eight particular-turning transformations, all resting on the undefiled) → then maturing sentient beings (in sequence, universally, spontaneously, in continuation, without surfeit; as the sun ripening the grains, one lamp lighting the many lamps, the vast sea taking in the streams) → then the purity of the dharma-realm (the four senses of nature, cause, work, and position) → then the three bodies of the Buddhas (Dharma, enjoyment, and emanation, one root and two dependents, equal and ever-abiding) → then the wisdom of the Buddhas (transforming the eight consciousnesses into the four wisdoms, gathering the four wisdoms to furnish the three bodies — this is the eye of the chapter) → then the Buddha neither one nor many (by difference of cause not one, by the same support not many) → then the skillful means of entering Buddhahood (non-discrimination is the swift becoming of a Buddha) → then the Buddhas' common deed (entering the Buddha-substance as the hundred streams enter the sea, of one flavour) → ending in urging toward and longing to seek (the wise should arouse the mind of awakening).
This continues the fruit of transformation of the basis taught at the end of the "five positions" in the Chapter on Reality. The present chapter pairs the eight consciousnesses with the four wisdoms through "the eighth, seventh, sixth, and five consciousnesses are attained in sequence through transformation," and then relates the four wisdoms to the three bodies. The verse does not decide that what precedes and follows is one identical consciousness-substance, and this exposition does not add "their very substance is" as its conclusion. The translation preface calls this "set out in fullness as the scriptures and treatises had never done before" and "heard as never heard, seen as never seen": the chapter lays out buddhahood from cause to fruit, body to wisdom, and realm to works, with the section on transforming consciousness into wisdom and the four wisdoms and three bodies as its particular eye.
考據Apparatus
古有異說並錄而不判。
一 科判定位
菩提品居脊樑第十,為序所獨標「最微妙」之經眼:「轉八識以成四智、束四智以具三身,詳諸經論所未曾有」。瑜伽·菩薩地〈菩提品〉與之相當。 李百藥序 T31n1604 0589c25–c27 原文稱:「其菩提一品最為微妙」;並以「轉八識以成四智,束四智以具三身,詳諸經論所未曾有」標舉此品,謂其「聞所未聞、見所未見」。 本段(諸佛智)自分:四智總標·轉識 →鏡智(二偈)→平等智(二偈·結『前二智即法身』)→觀智(二偈·結「即食身」)→作事智(一偈·結「即化身」)→總結偈。
二 譯名對校(本論無別譯·與玄奘系同義對列)
| 本品(波羅頗譯) | 玄奘系同義 |
|---|---|
| 鏡智 | 大圓鏡智(ādarśa-jñāna) |
| 平等智 | 平等性智(samatā-jñāna) |
| 觀智 | 妙觀察智(pratyavekṣaṇā-jñāna) |
| 作事智 | 成所作智(kṛtya-anuṣṭhāna-jñāna) |
| 食身 | 受用身(saṃbhoga-kāya) |
| 自性身/化身 | 自性身/變化身 |
三 義之所立(眼·序所標)
本段立轉識成智與四智具三身:
- 轉八識成四智:轉第八阿賴耶識得鏡智、轉第七末那識得平等智、轉第六意識得觀智、轉前五識得作事智。
- 四智具三身(本論本品所配):鏡智、平等智合為法身(「此前二智即是法身」);觀智為食身(受用身,「此觀智即是食身」);作事智為化身。
- 鏡智為諸智之因、大智藏,餘身餘智之像皆從鏡智現起,故名「鏡智」。
下游承用:成唯識論卷十(四智相應心品·三身)、佛地經論 T1530、三十頌(轉依·第二十九至三十頌)。
四 古德徵引(四智配三身·古有異配並錄)
窺基《大乘法苑義林章》T45n1861(0359b27)引本論以配三身:「阿賴耶識得自性身。莊嚴論說。轉第八識得圓鏡智。故合二法為自性身。平等性智、妙觀察智為受用身……」
按:『四智配三身』,本論本品與慈恩(義林·成唯識)所配不同,並錄之:
- 本論本品:鏡智、平等智 → 法身;觀智 → 食身(受用身);作事智 → 化身。
- 慈恩系(義林 0359b27·成唯識論卷十):大圓鏡智 → 自性身;平等性智、妙觀察智 → 受用身;成所作智 → 變化身。
二說古德並傳,並錄而不判。系內由莊嚴而至成唯識,配身之說有所演移,如實傳之。
古德徵引彙錄(依古德著作分繫·皆引本品四智·三身·轉依·常之說)
下錄三家古德於著作中逕引本品(轉識成智·四智配身·三身常義)之文,逐條 verbatim、繫藏經頁碼、一句點所引之義。皆為『古德如何引用本品』之誌錄,於系內配身異說(§四上文)仍並錄不判。
一 窺基《大乘法苑義林章》T45n1861
- 0359b27 verbatim:「莊嚴論說。轉第八識得圓鏡智」——〔四智〕引本品『轉第八識成鏡智』配自性身。
- 0359c21 verbatim:「莊嚴論等說。自性身本性常故」——〔三身·常〕引本品證自性身(法身)本性常。
- 0360a03 verbatim:「莊嚴論中說。大圓鏡智是受用佛」——〔四智·三身〕引本品『鏡智屬受用』一面(與成唯識『鏡智配自性身』並存,見§四上)。
- 0367b16 verbatim:「莊嚴論說。常有三種。一本性常。二不斷常。三相續常」——〔常〕引本品三常(本性常·不斷常·相續常)判佛身之常。
二 窺基《成唯識論述記》T43n1830
- 0391b15 verbatim:「《佛地經》、《莊嚴論》說:平等智初起,第八初得淨時」——〔四智·轉依〕引本品明平等智初起與第八識初淨同時。
- 0405c14 verbatim:「《莊嚴論》、《攝論》第九,轉第七得平等智」——〔四智〕引本品證『轉第七末那得平等智』。
- 0409a29 verbatim:「《莊嚴論》說轉第七識得,此唯大乘所信」——〔四智〕引本品立「轉第七得平等智」為大乘所信之義。
- 0599b23 verbatim:「無性菩薩及《莊嚴論》說,且觀智轉五識等」——〔四智〕引本品論轉識(觀智·五識)之說。
- 0600a26 verbatim:「《莊嚴論》說於一切境皆不愚迷故」——〔四智〕引本品明觀智(妙觀察智)於一切境遍緣不愚。
- T43n1830 0602b19 verbatim:「《涅槃經》、《莊嚴論》等說,轉無常蘊,獲得常蘊」——〔轉依·常〕引本品證轉依果「轉無常蘊獲常蘊」。
- T43n1830 0603c28 verbatim:「《莊嚴論》說三種常,如《佛地論》第七等引」——〔常〕引本品三常釋自性身本常。
- T43n1830 0603c23 verbatim:「說成事智於十方土現難思化故」者,《佛地論》說《莊嚴論》說——〔四智·化身〕引本品明成事智(成所作智)十方現難思化。
- 0604a19 verbatim:「說圓鏡智是受用佛,此《莊嚴論》文」——〔四智·三身〕指明「鏡智是受用佛」一語即出本品。
- 0417a28 verbatim:「彼第二卷中〈菩薩品〉說,此能唯在成所作中……實緣一切皆無障礙」——〔未繫定〕原文自稱「彼第二卷中〈菩薩品〉」,現存 T1604 無對應〈菩薩品〉;故只錄《述記》引文,不繫本品,亦不列入本品確證數。
三 太賢《成唯識論學記》X50n0818
- X50n0818 0064c11 verbatim:「遍緣一切法者,如莊嚴論,於一切境不愚迷故」——〔四智〕引本品明觀智遍緣不愚。
- 0076a21 verbatim:「亦佛影像,如莊嚴論、地論」——〔四智·鏡智〕引本品明鏡智現佛影像。
- 0124c01 verbatim:「第三轉成門,廣如佛地莊嚴論等」——〔轉依〕指轉識成智門廣見本品。
- X50n0818 0125b05 verbatim:「轉無常蘊獲常蘊等,謂涅槃經、莊嚴論等」——〔轉依·常〕引本品證轉依果常蘊。
- 0126a06 verbatim:「觀智說法引莊嚴論」——〔四智〕指觀智說法之說引自本品。
- 0126a07 verbatim:「作智難思化者,莊嚴論也」——〔四智·化身〕指作事智(成所作智)難思化之說即出本品。
- X50n0818 0126a10–a11 verbatim:「莊嚴云:自性無間續,三佛俱堂中。既說身自性常」——〔三身·常〕引本品偈「由依心業故,三佛俱平等,自性無間續,三佛俱常住」證自性身之常;學記引文末二字作「堂中」,本論作「常住」,古德傳寫之異,並錄不改。
〔窺基暫定·須勘抄——不逕採為確證〕
下二條,窺基自標「須勘抄」(謂尚待覆勘本品原文、未經勘定),故僅錄其指向、標〔窺基暫定〕,不作確證 verbatim:
- 述記 0603c19 verbatim:「《莊嚴論》說:然須勘抄」——窺基自註:所引化身一義出處待勘本品。
- 述記 0603c21 verbatim:「亦在《莊嚴論》,須勘抄諸文」——窺基自註:觀智(大集會中說法)一義亦待覆勘本品諸文。
〔覆核:上列二十條確證徵引,皆屬本品『轉八識成四智·四智具三身·轉依·常』之經眼義;0417a28 另列為未繫定,不以篇名相似強繫本品。〕
五 名相(首見·義·羅馬字檢索輔助,非古傳音寫證據)
- 鏡智(大圓鏡智·ādarśa-jñāna):轉第八識所得,如大圓鏡離垢、無分別而現一切影像之智。
- 平等智(平等性智·samatā-jñāna):轉第七識所得,證自他平等、為大慈悲所依之智。
- 觀智(妙觀察智·pratyavekṣaṇā-jñāna):轉第六識所得,於諸法善能觀察、斷疑說法之智。
- 作事智(成所作智·kṛtya-anuṣṭhāna-jñāna):轉前五識所得,於諸世界作種種化事、利益眾生之智。
- 三身:法身(自性身·svābhāvika),佛之真如理體;食身(受用身·saṃbhoga-kāya),佛受法樂、為地上菩薩說法之身;化身(變化身·nirmāṇa-kāya),佛隨機示現化度眾生之身。
- 陀羅尼(dhāraṇī·總持)、三昧(samādhi·定)。
六 譬喻
- 大智藏喻:鏡智如大寶藏,餘智餘身之像皆從之生,顯鏡智為諸智之因。
- 鏡(像現)喻:萬像如鏡中影從鏡智現起,故名「鏡智」。
義疏借喻坐實(非本論自有)
義疏為助開解所引之他經譬喻/經證,本論無此文;坐實出處如下,與本論自有諸喻區別,並錄以對等底料。
- 〔虛空淨心喻〕:《究竟一乘寶性論》T31n1611 0814b09–b10 —「如虛空淨心,常明無轉變,為虛妄分別,客塵煩惱染。」義疏用於〔相甚深·清淨相段·釋「非淨非不淨」之本淨為客塵所染〕。
- 〔離垢日月·厚雲羅網喻〕:《究竟一乘寶性論》T31n1611 0816b08–b09 —「譬如虛空中,離垢淨日月,為彼厚密雲,羅網之所覆」;0816b15–b16 —「日無雲翳等,無垢功德具,顯現即彼體」。義疏用於〔相甚深·清淨相段·釋客塵可離、本淨乃顯非新得〕。
- 〔空花喻〕:《大方廣圓覺經》T17n0842 0913c01–c02 —「如眾空花滅於虛空,不可說言有定滅處,何以故?無生處故。」義疏用於〔相甚深·大我相段·釋妄我之亡如空花無生、非無我外別立一我〕。
- 〔糞穢真金·弊衣金像喻〕:《究竟一乘寶性論》T31n1611 卷四 —「如人行遠路,遺金糞穢中,經百千歲住,如本不變異。」「有天眼者見,為淨示眾人。」義疏用於〔諸佛智·轉識成智總引·釋轉去客塵而金性本有不改〕。
- 〔明鏡頓現喻〕:《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》T16n0670 0486a08 —「譬如明鏡,頓現一切無相色像。」義疏用於〔諸佛智·鏡智段·互參「諸相不現前」而「緣無分」之鏡德〕。
- 〔如實不空鏡(四鏡之一)喻〕:《大乘起信論》T32n1666 0576c20 稱「覺體」;0576c23–c25 —「謂如實不空,一切世間境界悉於中現,不出不入、不失不壞,常住一心。」義疏用於〔諸佛智·鏡智段·互參鏡智『照而不黏、現而不動』為萬智所依〕。
七 互讀
- 成唯識論卷十(四智相應心品·三身):本段四智三身之集大成所承,二者直接相接。
- 佛地經論 T1530(四智三身)、三十頌 T1586(轉依·第二十九至三十頌)。
八 校本定位
經眼段 T31n1604 0606c22–0607b22。古德引(見§四彙錄):義林 T45n1861(0359b27·0359c21·0360a03·0367b16)、述記 T43n1830(0391b15·0405c14·0409a29·0599b23·0600a26·0602b19·0603c28·0603c23·0604a19;未繫定 0417a28;另〔窺基暫定〕0603c19·0603c21)、學記 X50n0818(0064c11·0076a21·0124c01·0125b05·0126a06·0126a07·0126a10)。瑜伽·菩薩地〈菩提品〉T1579(僅確認同名品平行)。全品 0602a06–0608b03。
Where the ancients differ, both readings are set down and neither is adjudicated.
I. Doctrinal-structural placement (科判定位)
The Chapter on Awakening stands tenth along the spine and is the sūtra-eye that the preface singles out as "most subtle and wondrous": 「轉八識以成四智、束四智以具三身,詳諸經論所未曾有」 ["transforming the eight consciousnesses so as to complete the four wisdoms, and gathering the four wisdoms so as to be furnished with the three bodies — set out in detail as the scriptures and treatises had never done before"]. The Yogācārabhūmi, Bodhisattva-stage, Chapter on Awakening (瑜伽·菩薩地〈菩提品〉) corresponds to it. Li Baiyao's preface, T31n1604 0589c25–c27, calls it 「其菩提一品最為微妙」 ["its one Chapter on Awakening is the most subtle and wondrous"], singles it out with 「轉八識以成四智,束四智以具三身,詳諸經論所未曾有」 ["transforming the eight consciousnesses so as to complete the four wisdoms, gathering the four wisdoms so as to be furnished with the three bodies, set out in detail as the scriptures and treatises had never done before"], and calls it 「聞所未聞、見所未見」 ["what had never been heard or seen before"]. This passage (the wisdoms of the buddhas) divides of itself: the general statement of the four wisdoms · the transforming of consciousness → mirror wisdom (two verses) → equality wisdom (two verses · concluding "the former two wisdoms are precisely the dharma-body") → observing wisdom (two verses · concluding "it is precisely the enjoyment body") → accomplishing wisdom (one verse · concluding "it is precisely the emanation body") → the summarizing verse.
II. Comparison of rendered names (譯名對校 · this treatise has no separate translation · set out alongside the synonyms of the Xuanzang system)
| This chapter (Prabhākaramitra's rendering) | Xuanzang-system synonym |
|---|---|
| 鏡智 [mirror wisdom] | 大圓鏡智 [great perfect mirror wisdom] (ādarśa-jñāna) |
| 平等智 [equality wisdom] | 平等性智 [equality-nature wisdom] (samatā-jñāna) |
| 觀智 [observing wisdom] | 妙觀察智 [wondrous observing wisdom] (pratyavekṣaṇā-jñāna) |
| 作事智 [accomplishing wisdom] | 成所作智 [wisdom accomplishing what is to be done] (kṛtya-anuṣṭhāna-jñāna) |
| 食身 [the enjoyment body] | 受用身 [the enjoyment body] (saṃbhoga-kāya) |
| 自性身/化身 [the self-nature body / the emanation body] | 自性身/變化身 [the self-nature body / the transformation body] |
III. The meaning established (義之所立 · the eye · what the preface singles out)
This passage establishes the transforming of consciousness into wisdom and the four wisdoms being furnished with the three bodies:
- Transforming the eight consciousnesses into the four wisdoms (轉八識成四智): transforming the eighth consciousness, the store consciousness (阿賴耶識, ālaya-vijñāna), one obtains mirror wisdom; transforming the seventh consciousness, the manas (末那識), one obtains equality wisdom; transforming the sixth consciousness, the mind-consciousness (意識), one obtains observing wisdom; transforming the first five consciousnesses (前五識), one obtains accomplishing wisdom.
- The four wisdoms furnished with the three bodies (as this treatise, this chapter, configures them) 〔四智具三身(本論本品所配)〕: mirror wisdom and equality wisdom together make the dharma-body (法身) (「此前二智即是法身」 ["these former two wisdoms are precisely the dharma-body"]); observing wisdom is the enjoyment body (食身, the enjoyment body, 「此觀智即是食身」 ["this observing wisdom is precisely the enjoyment body"]); accomplishing wisdom is the emanation body (化身).
- Mirror wisdom is the cause of all the wisdoms, the great treasury of wisdom; the reflected images of the remaining bodies and remaining wisdoms all arise from mirror wisdom, and hence it is named "mirror wisdom."
Downstream inheritance: the Cheng Weishi Lun, scroll 10 (the mind-and-associates in accord with the four wisdoms · the three bodies), the Buddhabhūmi-śāstra T1530, the Thirty Verses (the transformation of the basis · verses twenty-nine to thirty).
IV. The ancient masters' citations (古德徵引 · the four wisdoms configured with the three bodies · where the ancients differ in configuration, both are set down)
Kuiji's Dharma-Garden Forest of Categories of the Mahāyāna 《大乘法苑義林章》 T45n1861 (0359b27) cites this treatise in configuring the three bodies: 「阿賴耶識得自性身。莊嚴論說。轉第八識得圓鏡智。故合二法為自性身。平等性智、妙觀察智為受用身……」 ["the store consciousness obtains the self-nature body. The Ornament of the Sūtras says: transforming the eighth consciousness one obtains perfect-mirror wisdom. Hence the two dharmas are combined into the self-nature body. Equality-nature wisdom and wondrous observing wisdom make the enjoyment body…"]
Note: as to "the four wisdoms configured with the three bodies," this treatise and this chapter configure them differently from Cien (the Forest of Categories · the Cheng Weishi Lun), and both are set down:
- This treatise, this chapter: mirror wisdom, equality wisdom → the dharma-body; observing wisdom → the enjoyment body (受用身); accomplishing wisdom → the emanation body.
- The Cien system (the Forest of Categories 0359b27 · the Cheng Weishi Lun scroll 10): great perfect mirror wisdom → the self-nature body; equality-nature wisdom, wondrous observing wisdom → the enjoyment body; wisdom-accomplishing-what-is-to-be-done → the transformation body.
Both accounts are transmitted by the ancient masters together, set down and not adjudicated. Within the system, from the Ornament on to the Cheng Weishi Lun, the account of configuring the bodies has undergone some shift and development; it is transmitted as it is.
A gathered record of the ancient masters' citations (arranged by the master's work · each citing this chapter's four wisdoms · three bodies · transformation of the basis · constancy)
Recorded below are the passages in which three masters, in their works, directly cite this chapter (transforming consciousness into wisdom · configuring the wisdoms with the bodies · the constancy-meaning of the three bodies), each verbatim, fastened to its canon-page, with a one-line note of the meaning cited. All are a record of "how the ancient masters cite this chapter"; as to the intra-system difference in configuring the bodies (§IV above), both are still set down and not adjudicated.
One — Kuiji, Dharma-Garden Forest of Categories of the Mahāyāna 《大乘法苑義林章》 T45n1861
- 0359b27 verbatim: 「莊嚴論說。轉第八識得圓鏡智」 ["the Ornament of the Sūtras says: transforming the eighth consciousness one obtains perfect-mirror wisdom"] — 〔four wisdoms〕 cites this chapter's "transforming the eighth consciousness into mirror wisdom," configured to the self-nature body.
- 0359c21 verbatim: 「莊嚴論等說。自性身本性常故」 ["the Ornament of the Sūtras and the rest say: the self-nature body is by essential nature constant"] — 〔three bodies · constancy〕 cites this chapter to attest that the self-nature body (the dharma-body) is by essential nature constant.
- 0360a03 verbatim: 「莊嚴論中說。大圓鏡智是受用佛」 ["in the Ornament of the Sūtras it says: great perfect mirror wisdom is the enjoyment buddha"] — 〔four wisdoms · three bodies〕 cites this chapter for the one aspect "mirror wisdom belongs to the enjoyment" (coexisting with the Cheng Weishi Lun's "mirror wisdom configured to the self-nature body," see §IV above).
- 0367b16 verbatim: 「莊嚴論說。常有三種。一本性常。二不斷常。三相續常」 ["the Ornament of the Sūtras says: constancy is of three kinds — first, essential constancy; second, unbroken constancy; third, continuous constancy"] — 〔constancy〕 cites this chapter's three constancies (essential constancy · unbroken constancy · continuous constancy) to judge the constancy of the buddha's bodies.
Two — Kuiji, Notes on the Cheng Weishi Lun 《成唯識論述記》 T43n1830
- 0391b15 verbatim: 「《佛地經》、《莊嚴論》說:平等智初起,第八初得淨時」 ["the Buddhabhūmi-sūtra and the Ornament of the Sūtras say: equality wisdom first arises at the time when the eighth consciousness first becomes pure"] — 〔four wisdoms · transformation of the basis〕 cites this chapter to show that the first arising of equality wisdom is simultaneous with the first purifying of the eighth consciousness.
- 0405c14 verbatim: 「《莊嚴論》、《攝論》第九,轉第七得平等智」 ["the Ornament of the Sūtras and the Mahāyāna-saṃgraha, ninth, [say] transforming the seventh one obtains equality wisdom"] — 〔four wisdoms〕 cites this chapter to attest that "transforming the seventh, the manas, one obtains equality wisdom."
- 0409a29 verbatim: 「《莊嚴論》說轉第七識得,此唯大乘所信」 ["the Ornament of the Sūtras says one obtains it by transforming the seventh consciousness; this is believed only in the Great Vehicle"] — 〔four wisdoms〕 cites this chapter to establish "transforming the seventh one obtains equality wisdom" as a meaning believed in the Great Vehicle.
- 0599b23 verbatim: 「無性菩薩及《莊嚴論》說,且觀智轉五識等」 ["the bodhisattva Asvabhāva and the Ornament of the Sūtras say that observing wisdom, for its part, transforms the five consciousnesses, and so forth"] — 〔four wisdoms〕 cites this chapter's account of transforming consciousness (observing wisdom · the five consciousnesses).
- 0600a26 verbatim: 「《莊嚴論》說於一切境皆不愚迷故」 ["the Ornament of the Sūtras says that toward all objects [it is] without confusion or delusion"] — 〔four wisdoms〕 cites this chapter to show that observing wisdom (wondrous observing wisdom) pervasively cognizes all objects without confusion.
- T43n1830 0602b19 verbatim: 「《涅槃經》、《莊嚴論》等說,轉無常蘊,獲得常蘊」 ["the Nirvāṇa-sūtra, the Ornament of the Sūtras, and the rest say: transforming the impermanent aggregates, one obtains the constant aggregates"] — 〔transformation of the basis · constancy〕 cites this chapter to attest the fruit of the transformation of the basis, "transforming the impermanent aggregates one obtains the constant aggregates."
- T43n1830 0603c28 verbatim: 「《莊嚴論》說三種常,如《佛地論》第七等引」 ["the Ornament of the Sūtras speaks of three kinds of constancy, as the Buddhabhūmi-śāstra, seventh, and the rest cite"] — 〔constancy〕 cites this chapter's three constancies in explaining that the self-nature body is by essence constant.
- T43n1830 0603c23 verbatim: 「說成事智於十方土現難思化故」者,《佛地論》說《莊嚴論》說 ["as for the saying 'accomplishing wisdom manifests inconceivable transformations in the lands of the ten directions,' the Buddhabhūmi-śāstra says [it], the Ornament of the Sūtras says [it]"] — 〔four wisdoms · emanation body〕 cites this chapter to show that accomplishing wisdom (wisdom-accomplishing-what-is-to-be-done) manifests inconceivable transformations in the ten directions.
- 0604a19 verbatim: 「說圓鏡智是受用佛,此《莊嚴論》文」 ["the saying 'perfect-mirror wisdom is the enjoyment buddha' — this is text of the Ornament of the Sūtras"] — 〔four wisdoms · three bodies〕 points out that the very phrase "mirror wisdom is the enjoyment buddha" issues from this chapter.
- 0417a28 verbatim: 「彼第二卷中〈菩薩品〉說,此能唯在成所作中……實緣一切皆無障礙」 ["in its second scroll, the Chapter on the Bodhisattva says that this capacity lies only within wisdom-accomplishing-what-is-to-be-done … it really cognizes all things without any obstruction"] — 〔unplaced〕 the citation itself names “its second scroll, Chapter on the Bodhisattva,” for which extant T1604 has no corresponding chapter. It is therefore recorded only as a citation in the Notes, not fastened to this chapter and not counted among this chapter's confirmed attestations.
Three — Taehyŏn, Study-Notes on the Cheng Weishi Lun 《成唯識論學記》 X50n0818
- X50n0818 0064c11 verbatim: 「遍緣一切法者,如莊嚴論,於一切境不愚迷故」 ["as for pervasively cognizing all dharmas — as the Ornament of the Sūtras [says], toward all objects it is without confusion or delusion"] — 〔four wisdoms〕 cites this chapter to show that observing wisdom pervasively cognizes without confusion.
- 0076a21 verbatim: 「亦佛影像,如莊嚴論、地論」 ["also the reflected images of buddhas, as the Ornament of the Sūtras and the Yogācārabhūmi [say]"] — 〔four wisdoms · mirror wisdom〕 cites this chapter to show that mirror wisdom manifests the reflected images of buddhas.
- 0124c01 verbatim: 「第三轉成門,廣如佛地莊嚴論等」 ["the third, the gate of transforming-and-completing — at length as in the Buddhabhūmi [-śāstra], the Ornament of the Sūtras, and the rest"] — 〔transformation of the basis〕 points out that the gate of transforming consciousness into wisdom is seen at length in this chapter.
- X50n0818 0125b05 verbatim: 「轉無常蘊獲常蘊等,謂涅槃經、莊嚴論等」 ["transforming the impermanent aggregates one obtains the constant aggregates, and so forth — namely the Nirvāṇa-sūtra, the Ornament of the Sūtras, and the rest"] — 〔transformation of the basis · constancy〕 cites this chapter to attest the constant-aggregates fruit of the transformation of the basis.
- 0126a06 verbatim: 「觀智說法引莊嚴論」 ["observing wisdom's expounding of the Dharma cites the Ornament of the Sūtras"] — 〔four wisdoms〕 points out that the account of observing wisdom's expounding of the Dharma is cited from this chapter.
- 0126a07 verbatim: 「作智難思化者,莊嚴論也」 ["accomplishing wisdom's inconceivable transformations — [this is] the Ornament of the Sūtras"] — 〔four wisdoms · emanation body〕 points out that the account of accomplishing wisdom's (wisdom-accomplishing-what-is-to-be-done's) inconceivable transformations issues precisely from this chapter.
- X50n0818 0126a10–a11 verbatim: 「莊嚴云:自性無間續,三佛俱堂中。既說身自性常」 ["the Ornament says: the self-nature unbrokenly continues, and the three buddhas alike are in the hall [堂中]. Since it speaks of the body's self-nature being constant"] — 〔three bodies · constancy〕 cites this chapter's verse 「由依心業故,三佛俱平等,自性無間續,三佛俱常住」 ["because they rest on the mind and its activity, the three buddhas are alike equal; the self-nature unbrokenly continues, and the three buddhas alike constantly abide"] to attest the constancy of the self-nature body; at the close of the Study-Notes' citation the last two graphs read 「堂中」 ["in the hall"], whereas this treatise reads 「常住」 ["constantly abide"] — a difference of the ancient masters' transmitted copying, set down together and left unaltered.
〔Kuiji's provisional note · "to be verified against the copy" — not to be taken outright as confirmed attestation〕
The two entries below Kuiji himself marks "to be verified against the copy" (that is, they still await a re-checking of this chapter's original text and have not been settled); therefore only their pointing is recorded, marked 〔Kuiji provisional〕, and they are not treated as confirmed verbatim:
- Notes 0603c19 verbatim: 「《莊嚴論》說:然須勘抄」 ["the Ornament of the Sūtras says [it]; but it must be verified against the copy"] — Kuiji's own note: the source for the one meaning of the emanation body cited awaits verification against this chapter.
- Notes 0603c21 verbatim: 「亦在《莊嚴論》,須勘抄諸文」 ["it is also in the Ornament of the Sūtras; the several passages must be verified against the copy"] — Kuiji's own note: the one meaning of observing wisdom (expounding the Dharma in the great assembly) also awaits a re-checking of this chapter's several passages.
〔Re-check: the twenty confirmed citations listed above belong to this chapter's sūtra-eye meaning of "transforming the eight consciousnesses into the four wisdoms · the four wisdoms furnished with the three bodies · the transformation of the basis · constancy." The citation at 0417a28 is separately recorded as unplaced rather than forced into this chapter.〕
V. Terms (first appearance · meaning · romanized retrieval labels, not ancient-transmission witnesses)
- 鏡智 [mirror wisdom] (大圓鏡智 great perfect mirror wisdom · ādarśa-jñāna): obtained by transforming the eighth consciousness; the wisdom that, like a great perfect mirror parted from defilement, without discrimination manifests all reflected images.
- 平等智 [equality wisdom] (平等性智 equality-nature wisdom · samatā-jñāna): obtained by transforming the seventh consciousness; the wisdom that realizes the equality of self and other and is the ground of great compassion.
- 觀智 [observing wisdom] (妙觀察智 wondrous observing wisdom · pratyavekṣaṇā-jñāna): obtained by transforming the sixth consciousness; the wisdom that well observes the dharmas, cuts off doubt, and expounds the Dharma.
- 作事智 [accomplishing wisdom] (成所作智 wisdom accomplishing what is to be done · kṛtya-anuṣṭhāna-jñāna): obtained by transforming the first five consciousnesses; the wisdom that performs all manner of transforming deeds in the various world-realms and benefits sentient beings.
- 三身 [the three bodies]: the dharma-body (自性身 the self-nature body · svābhāvika), the buddha's true-suchness principle-substance; the enjoyment body (受用身 · saṃbhoga-kāya), the body by which the buddha enjoys the joy of the Dharma and expounds the Dharma to the bodhisattvas of the grounds; the emanation body (變化身 the transformation body · nirmāṇa-kāya), the body by which the buddha, responding to capacities, manifests to transform and deliver sentient beings.
- 陀羅尼 (dhāraṇī · total retention) [dhāraṇī, that which holds all], 三昧 (samādhi · concentration) [samādhi, concentration].
VI. Similes & figures (譬喻)
- The simile of the great treasury of wisdom (大智藏喻): mirror wisdom is like a great jewel-treasury from which the reflected images of the remaining wisdoms and remaining bodies are all born, showing mirror wisdom to be the cause of all the wisdoms.
- The simile of the mirror (the manifesting of images) (鏡〔像現〕喻): the myriad images arise from mirror wisdom like the reflections within a mirror, and hence it is named "mirror wisdom."
Similes borrowed by the Exposition, secured to source (not the treatise's own) (義疏借喻坐實 · 非本論自有)
The similes and scriptural attestations from other scriptures that the Exposition layer draws in as an aid to understanding — the present treatise has no such text; the sources are secured below, kept distinct from the treatise's own similes, and set down together as equal underlying material.
- 〔The simile of space and the pure mind〕 (虛空淨心喻): the Ratnagotravibhāga 《究竟一乘寶性論》 T31n1611 0814b09–b10 — 「如虛空淨心,常明無轉變,為虛妄分別,客塵煩惱染。」 ["like the space-like pure mind, ever luminous, without alteration, defiled by false discrimination and by adventitious dust-defilements."] The Exposition uses it at 〔the profundity of the characteristic · the passage on the pure characteristic · in explaining "neither pure nor impure," where the intrinsically pure is defiled by adventitious dust〕.
- 〔The simile of the defilement-freed sun and moon · the thick cloud and net〕 (離垢日月·厚雲羅網喻): the Ratnagotravibhāga 《究竟一乘寶性論》 T31n1611 0816b08–b09 — 「譬如虛空中,離垢淨日月,為彼厚密雲,羅網之所覆」; 0816b15–b16 — 「日無雲翳等,無垢功德具,顯現即彼體」 ["in space, the defilement-freed pure sun and moon are covered by that thick dense cloud and net"; "the sun without cloud-veil and the rest, furnished with defilement-free qualities — its manifesting is precisely that substance"]. The Exposition uses it at 〔the profundity of the characteristic · the passage on the pure characteristic · in explaining that the adventitious can be parted from, and the intrinsically pure is thereupon manifest, not newly attained〕.
- 〔The simile of the sky-flower〕 (空花喻): the Sūtra of Perfect Enlightenment 《大方廣圓覺經》 T17n0842 0913c01–c02 — 「如眾空花滅於虛空,不可說言有定滅處,何以故?無生處故。」 ["like the many sky-flowers ceasing in space, of which one cannot say there is a fixed place of cessation — why? because there is no place of arising."] The Exposition uses it at 〔the profundity of the characteristic · the passage on the great-self characteristic · in explaining that the vanishing of the false self is like the sky-flower's non-arising, and that no self is separately set up apart from selflessness〕.
- 〔The simile of true gold in filth · the golden image in tattered cloth〕 (糞穢真金·弊衣金像喻): the Ratnagotravibhāga 《究竟一乘寶性論》 T31n1611, scroll four — 「如人行遠路,遺金糞穢中,經百千歲住,如本不變異。」「有天眼者見,為淨示眾人。」 ["like a man travelling a distant road who drops gold into filth, where it remains a hundred thousand years, unchanged as at the first." "One who has the divine eye sees it and, having cleaned it, shows it to the people."] The Exposition uses it at 〔the wisdoms of the buddhas · the general citation for transforming consciousness into wisdom · in explaining that the adventitious dust is transformed away while the gold-nature is intrinsically present and unaltered〕.
- 〔The simile of the bright mirror's instant manifesting〕 (明鏡頓現喻): the Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra 《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》 T16n0670 0486a08 — 「譬如明鏡,頓現一切無相色像。」 ["it is like a bright mirror that instantly manifests all markless form-images."] The Exposition uses it at 〔the wisdoms of the buddhas · the passage on mirror wisdom · cross-referencing "the characteristics do not appear before it" while "the object-condition is nil," the virtue of the mirror〕.
- 〔The simile of the mirror of the really-not-empty (one of the four mirrors)〕 (如實不空鏡〔四鏡之一〕喻): the Awakening of Faith in the Mahāyāna 《大乘起信論》 T32n1666 uses 「覺體」 at 0576c20; at 0576c23–c25 it says 「謂如實不空,一切世間境界悉於中現,不出不入、不失不壞,常住一心。」 ["that is, the really-not-empty: all the world's objects appear within it, neither issuing forth nor entering in, neither lost nor spoiled, constantly abiding in the one mind."] The Exposition uses it at 〔the wisdoms of the buddhas · the passage on mirror wisdom · cross-referencing mirror wisdom as "illumining yet not adhering, manifesting yet not moving," the ground of the myriad wisdoms〕.
VII. Cross-readings (互讀)
- The Cheng Weishi Lun, scroll 10 (the mind-and-associates in accord with the four wisdoms · the three bodies): the culminating inheritance of this passage's four wisdoms and three bodies, the two joining directly.
- The Buddhabhūmi-śāstra T1530 (the four wisdoms and three bodies), the Thirty Verses T1586 (the transformation of the basis · verses twenty-nine to thirty).
VIII. Witness collation (校本定位)
The sūtra-eye passage is T31n1604 0606c22–0607b22. The ancient masters' citations (see the gathered record, §IV): the Forest of Categories T45n1861 (0359b27 · 0359c21 · 0360a03 · 0367b16), the Notes T43n1830 (0391b15 · 0405c14 · 0409a29 · 0599b23 · 0600a26 · 0602b19 · 0603c28 · 0603c23 · 0604a19; unplaced 0417a28; and 〔Kuiji provisional〕 0603c19 · 0603c21), the Study-Notes X50n0818 (0064c11 · 0076a21 · 0124c01 · 0125b05 · 0126a06 · 0126a07 · 0126a10). The Yogācārabhūmi, Bodhisattva-stage, Chapter on Awakening T1579 is retained here only as a verified chapter-name parallel. The whole chapter is 0602a06–0608b03.