清淨道論 初道智・入流者Visuddhimagga · First Path Knowledge and the Stream-Enterer
隨順三心之後是種姓智:它站在門檻上,不屬於行道智見清淨也不屬於智見清淨,居中不可言說;但它第一次以涅槃為所緣——初轉、初傾心、初思念——超越凡夫的種姓,入聖者的種姓。想成就初道的人並沒有另外什麼要做的:該做的在前面二十一品全做完了。
三個譬喻連起來就是入道的一剎那。跳大溝:抓著從此岸垂下的繩子——諸行的無常苦無我——躍起、傾向彼岸、到對岸上方,那是三個隨順心;放手落地,是種姓;搖晃著還沒站穩,站穩是道。三個隨順心都不放繩,是靠諸行的力量盪過去的;放早了就掉溝裡。月與雲:三陣風吹散粗、中、細的雲,是三隨順除覆諦之闇;有眼的人見月,是種姓見涅槃——風不能見月,人不能吹雲,各做一件。蒙眼射師:另一人以杖給信號,射師不放信號,一箭射穿一百張板——道不放種姓的信號,以涅槃為所緣,貫穿貪瞋癡三蘊。這道還枯竭無始輪迴的苦海、關閉一切惡趣之門、令七聖財現前、令人成為正等覺者的胸生子。
然後二或三個果心,然後回頭看:我實是由這道而來的、這是我所得的功德、我所斷的是這些、我所餘的是這些、這法是我從所緣上所通達的——五種省察。這是全書減法的兌現:前面每一品拆掉的,在這一剎那被道貫穿;而終點不是空無,是被通達的止息。入流者即使極為放逸,也至多七返:腳踩上去,就不會退。至於還剩哪些煩惱,有學不一定知道——摩訶男問過佛這個問題。證了不等於什麼都知道。
After the three conformity consciousnesses comes change-of-lineage knowledge. It stands on the threshold, belonging neither to purification by knowledge and vision of the way nor to purification by knowledge and vision and not classed under either; yet it takes nibbāna as object for the first time—first turning, first inclination, first directing of attention—and crosses beyond the ordinary person’s lineage into the lineage of the noble ones. One who wishes to attain the first path has nothing further to do: everything to be done was completed in the preceding twenty-one chapters.
Three similes together portray the instant of entering the path. Leaping a great ditch: grasping the rope hanging from the near bank—the impermanence, suffering, and not-self of formations—one leaps, inclines toward the far bank, and arrives above it; these are the three conformity consciousnesses. Releasing the rope and landing is change-of-lineage; it still sways and has not gained firm footing, while firm footing is the path. All three conformity consciousnesses keep hold of the rope: the strength of formations swings the mind across, and releasing too early means falling into the ditch. The moon and clouds: three winds scatter the gross, medium, and fine clouds—the three conformity consciousnesses dispel the darkness concealing the truths; the person with sight sees the moon—change-of-lineage sees nibbāna. The winds cannot see the moon, and the person cannot scatter the clouds; each does one thing. The blindfolded archer: another person gives a stick signal, and without losing that signal the archer shoots one arrow through one hundred boards—the path, without losing change-of-lineage’s signal, takes nibbāna as object and pierces the aggregates of greed, hate, and delusion. This path also dries up the ocean of suffering in the beginningless round, closes every door to bad destinations, brings the seven noble treasures into one’s presence, and makes one a true-born child at the breast of the Rightly and Fully Enlightened One.
Then come two or three fruition consciousnesses, followed by the backward look: I have indeed come by this path; this is the benefit I obtained; these are what I abandoned; these are what remain; this is the Dhamma I penetrated by way of the object—the five reviews. Here the subtraction undertaken throughout the work is fulfilled: what each preceding chapter dismantled is pierced by the path in this instant, yet the endpoint is not nothingness but stilling that has been realized. Even if exceedingly negligent, a stream-enterer returns at most seven times: once the foot has landed, it does not fall back. As for which defilements remain, a trainee does not necessarily know—Mahānāma asked the Buddha precisely this question. Attainment does not mean knowing everything.
本單元白話為本編自巴利原典之譯疏(tr. mine);底本事項詳本單元考據。
§1 智見清淨之界與種姓智之生起 〔CSCD §806〕
二十二、智見清淨釋
自此以後是種姓智。因為它處在道之轉向的位置,所以既不屬於行道智見清淨,也不屬於智見清淨,而唯在二者中間、不可言說¹。然而因為它落在觀之流中,所以仍稱之為觀。而入流道、一來道、不還道、阿羅漢道——於這四道之中的智,就叫作智見清淨。
其中,想要成就初道智的人,並沒有另外什麼應當作的。因為凡是他所應作的,在生起以隨順為終的觀之時就已經作了。而這樣生起了隨順智的人,由那三個隨順智隨其自力而使粗厚的覆諦之闇隱沒之後,他的心於一切行之上不躍入、不住立、不勝解、不著、不黏、不縛。就如同水在蓮葉之上一般,它退縮、卷縮、退轉。一切以相為所緣者、一切以轉起為所緣者,都現為障礙。這樣,當一切以相與轉起為所緣者都現為障礙時,在隨順智之數習的末尾,以無相、不轉起、無為、滅、涅槃為所緣,超越凡夫之種姓、凡夫之名、凡夫之地,入於聖者之種姓、聖者之名、聖者之地,於涅槃之所緣而成為初轉、初傾心、初思念,依無間、等無間、數習、親依止、無有、離去而以六種行相成就其為道之緣,至於頂而為觀之頂、不復還——這樣的種姓智就生起了。
就是就這一點而說了——
『怎樣是於外之出起與還轉之慧、種姓智呢?勝過生起,所以是種姓。勝過轉起……乃至(廣說如前)……勝過惱,所以是種姓。勝過外之諸行之相,所以是種姓。躍入不生起,所以是種姓。躍入不轉起……乃至(廣說如前)……躍入不惱、滅、涅槃,所以是種姓。勝過生起而躍入不生起,所以是種姓。』——一切都應當廣說。
§2 渡溝之喻——隨順與種姓於一心路之所緣之異 〔CSCD §807〕
這裡,關於隨順與種姓雖以一轉向而在一心路中轉起、卻於不同所緣而轉起之相,有這樣一個譬喻:正如想要跳過大溝而立於彼岸的人,急急奔跑,抓住繫在溝之此岸樹枝上垂下的繩子或竿子而躍起,身體向彼岸而傾、而趣、而臨;到了彼岸的上方,就放開它,搖晃著落到彼岸,慢慢站穩。同樣地,這位瑜伽者也想要立於作為諸有、生、趣、住、居所之彼岸的涅槃,就以生滅隨觀等而急急奔跑,以隨順之轉向抓住繫在自體之樹枝上垂下的色之繩、或受等之中隨一之竿,取之為無常、或為苦、或為無我;他並不放開它,而以第一隨順心躍起,以第二隨順心如同身體向彼岸而傾、而趣、而臨一般,心向涅槃而傾、而趣、而臨;以第三隨順心如同到了彼岸的上方一般,接近了如今所應得的涅槃;隨著那心之滅,就放開那以行為所緣者,而以種姓心落到作為彼岸的無為之涅槃。然而因為在一所緣上未得數習,就像那搖晃的人一樣,還沒有善立;此後才以道智而立。
§3 隨順與種姓之分工——月雲之喻 〔CSCD §808〕
這裡,隨順能夠除去覆諦之煩惱的闇,卻不能以涅槃為所緣;種姓能夠唯以涅槃為所緣,卻不能除去覆諦之闇。這裡有這樣一個譬喻:據說有一位有眼的人想著「我要知道星宿之合」,在夜分出來,為了看月而向上仰望;因為月為諸雲所覆,月沒有顯現。這時起了一陣風,吹散了粗厚的雲;第二陣吹散中等的,第三陣吹散細的。於是那人在雲已散的空中見了月,就知道了星宿之合。
這裡,三種雲就如同覆諦的粗、中、細三重煩惱之暗,三陣風就如同三個隨順心,有眼的人就如同種姓智,月就如同涅槃;一一之風次第吹散雲,就如同一一之隨順心除去覆諦之闇;那人在雲已散的空中見清淨之月,就如同在覆諦之闇已除時種姓智見清淨之涅槃。
正如那三陣風唯能吹散覆月之雲而不能見月;同樣地,諸隨順也唯能除去覆諦之闇而不能見涅槃。正如那人唯能見月而不能吹散雲;同樣地,種姓智也唯能見涅槃而不能除去煩惱之闇。就因為這樣,才說它是道之轉向。因為它雖然不是轉向,卻同樣立在轉向的位置上,好像對道說了「你要這樣生起」而給了信號,然後就滅去。而道也不放開它所給的信號,以無間之相續而接續著那智,貫穿、破裂那先未貫穿、先未破裂的貪蘊、瞋蘊、癡蘊而生起。
§4 射師之喻與道之九功德 〔CSCD §809–810〕
這裡有這樣一個譬喻:據說有一位射師,在八烏薩婆²之地立了一百張板,用布蒙住臉,張弓搭箭,站在轉輪的機關上。另一個人轉動輪機,當那些板正對射師時,就用杖在那裡給信號。射師不放開杖之信號而放箭,就射穿了一百張板。這裡,杖之信號就如同種姓智,射師就如同道智。射師不放開杖之信號而射穿百板,就如同道智不放開種姓智所給的信號,而以涅槃為所緣,貫穿、破裂那先未貫穿、先未破裂的貪、瞋、癡三蘊。
而這道不但只作貪蘊等的貫穿而已,並且還枯竭無始輪迴之苦海,關閉一切惡趣之門,令七聖財現前,捨斷八支邪道,止息一切怨與怖畏,令得為正等覺者之胸生子的地位,並且導向其餘數百種功德的獲得——與這樣給與眾多功德的入流道相應的智,就叫作入流道之智。
初道智竟。
§5 果心之數與入流者之五省察・十九省察 〔CSCD §811–812〕
而在這智之後無間,作為它的異熟的二或三個果心生起。正因為出世間善的異熟是無間的,所以才有「他們說那定³是無間的」以及「遲得無間而至諸漏之盡」等等的說法。而有些人說果心是一、二、三或四,那不可取。
因為在隨順之數習的末尾種姓智才生起,所以至少也必須有兩個隨順心。因為一個心得不到數習之緣,而一轉向之心路又極於七心。所以,凡有兩個隨順的人,他的第三是種姓、第四是道心,就有三個果心;凡有三個隨順的人,他的第四是種姓、第五是道心,就有兩個果心。所以說「二或三個果心生起」。
而有些人說:凡有四個隨順的人,他的第五是種姓、第六是道心,就有一個果心。然而這個說法,因為安止唯在第四或第五,其後由於接近有分⁴而不再安止,所以已被遮止。因此不應當以之為實。
到這裡,這人就成了所謂入流者⁵、第二聖者。他即使極為放逸,也至多在天與人之中往返流轉七次而能作苦之邊際。而在果的終了,他的心落入有分;然後切斷有分,為了省察道而生起意門轉向;那滅了之後,就依次有七個省察道的速行。再落入有分之後,又依同樣的方法,為了省察果等等而生起轉向等等。由於它們的生起,這人就省察道、省察果、省察已斷之煩惱、省察餘殘之煩惱、省察涅槃。
因為他這樣省察道:「我實是由這道而來的。」然後這樣省察果:「這是我所得的功德。」然後這樣省察已斷之煩惱:「我所斷的就是這些煩惱。」然後這樣省察上三道所應斷的煩惱:「我所餘的就是這些煩惱。」最後這樣省察不死之涅槃:「這法是我從所緣上所通達的。」這樣,入流的聖弟子就有五種省察。而正如入流者,一來者與不還者也是這樣。至於阿羅漢,則沒有所謂餘殘煩惱之省察。這樣,一切合起來就叫作十九種省察。
而這唯是最上之限。因為已斷與餘殘之煩惱的省察,在有學也是或有或無。正因為沒有那省察,摩訶男才問世尊:「究竟我內心有什麼法未斷,以致我有時竟為貪法所纏心?」——一切都應當廣說。
註
¹ 不可言說(abbohārika):種姓智居於行道智見清淨與智見清淨之間而不入其數之判語。
² 烏薩婆(usabha):古印度之地之長度單位;本篇唯以之記射處之遠近,論不自釋其量,本編不代定。
³ 定(samādhi):心與心所於一所緣平等安住而不散亂。依其位有近行定(諸蓋已伏而尚未入安止)與安止定(心全然入於所緣而不動)二級;此處所引之「無間之定」則指道之定。
⁴ 有分:心相續之底流,心路起時自其轉出、路盡復落入其中;其轉起之開演在〈蘊〉一品之識蘊一篇。
⁵ 入流者(sotāpanna):入於聖道之流者;論自標其為第二聖者,極七返而作苦之邊際。
The vernacular of this unit is this edition’s own rendering-with-exposition from the Pāli original (tr. mine); see this unit’s apparatus for the base-text particulars.
§1 The Scope of Purification by Knowledge and Vision and the Arising of Change-of-Lineage Knowledge 〔CSCD §806〕
Chapter Twenty-Two: Explanation of Purification by Knowledge and Vision
From this point onward comes change-of-lineage knowledge. Because it occupies the position of adverting to the path, it belongs neither to purification by knowledge and vision of the way nor to purification by knowledge and vision; between the two, it is not classed as either.¹ Yet because it falls within the stream of insight, it is still called insight. The knowledge in the four paths—the path of stream-entry, the path of once-returning, the path of non-returning, and the path of arahantship—is called purification by knowledge and vision.
Here, one who wishes to accomplish knowledge of the first path has nothing further to do. For everything to be done has already been done when insight ending in conformity arose. After the three instances of conformity knowledge, each according to its own strength, have made the gross darkness concealing the truths disappear, the mind no longer plunges into, stands upon, resolves upon, adheres to, clings to, or becomes bound to anything among all formations. Like water on a lotus leaf, it draws back, contracts, and recoils. Everything that has the sign as object and everything that has occurrence as object manifests as an impediment. When everything having the sign and occurrence as object has thus manifested as an impediment, then, at the end of the repetition of conformity knowledge, [a knowledge] arises that takes the signless, non-occurrence, the unformed, cessation, and nibbāna as object; surmounts the lineage, designation, and plane of the ordinary person; enters the lineage, designation, and plane of the noble ones; is the first turning, first inclination, and first directing of attention toward nibbāna as object; fulfills its condition for the path in six modes—as proximity, contiguity, repetition, decisive support, absence, and disappearance; has reached the summit and become insight’s summit; and does not turn back. Such is the arising of change-of-lineage knowledge.
It was with reference to this that the following was said:
“How is the understanding of emergence outwardly and of turning away change-of-lineage knowledge? It is change-of-lineage because it surmounts arising. It surmounts occurrence … up to (expanded as above) … it surmounts distress, and so it is change-of-lineage. It surmounts the sign of formations externally, and so it is change-of-lineage. It plunges into non-arising, and so it is change-of-lineage. It plunges into non-occurrence … up to (expanded as above) … it plunges into non-distress, cessation, and nibbāna, and so it is change-of-lineage. Having surmounted arising, it plunges into non-arising, and so it is change-of-lineage.”—all of this should be stated in full.
§2 The Simile of Crossing a Ditch—The Difference in Object Between Conformity and Change-of-Lineage Within One Cognitive Process 〔CSCD §807〕
Here is a simile illustrating how conformity and change-of-lineage, although occurring with one adverting in one cognitive process, occur upon different objects. Suppose a person wishing to leap over a great ditch and stand on the far bank runs swiftly, grasps a rope or pole hanging from a tree branch on the near bank, and leaps. With the body inclining, tending, and leaning toward the far bank, the person reaches a point above it, lets go, falls swaying onto the far bank, and slowly gains firm footing. In the same way, this meditator wishes to stand in nibbāna, the far bank of the kinds of existence, birth, destination, station, and abode. Running swiftly through contemplation of arising and passing away and the rest, the meditator, with the adverting of conformity, grasps the rope of materiality hanging from the tree branch of the individual existence—or a pole consisting of any one among feeling and the rest—and takes it as impermanent, suffering, or not-self. Without releasing it, the meditator leaps with the first conformity consciousness; with the second, the mind inclines, tends, and leans toward nibbāna, just as the body inclines, tends, and leans toward the far bank; with the third, the meditator comes close to the nibbāna now to be attained, just as the person reaches a point above the far bank. When that consciousness ceases, the meditator releases the formations-object and, with change-of-lineage consciousness, falls into the unformed nibbāna that is the far bank. Yet, having obtained no repetition upon that single object, the meditator is not yet firmly established, like the person who is swaying; firm establishment comes afterward through path knowledge.
§3 The Division of Work Between Conformity and Change-of-Lineage—The Simile of the Moon and Clouds 〔CSCD §808〕
Here, conformity can dispel the defilement-darkness concealing the truths, but it cannot take nibbāna as object; change-of-lineage can take only nibbāna as object, but it cannot dispel the darkness concealing the truths. The following is a simile. It is said that a person with sight, thinking, “I shall determine the conjunction of the stars,” went out at night and looked upward to see the moon. Because the moon was covered by clouds, it did not appear. Then a wind arose and scattered the gross clouds; a second scattered the medium clouds; and a third scattered the fine clouds. The person then saw the moon in the cloudless sky and determined the conjunction of the stars.
Here, the three clouds are like the gross, medium, and fine defilement-darkness concealing the truths; the three winds are like the three conformity consciousnesses; the person with sight is like change-of-lineage knowledge; and the moon is like nibbāna. Each wind’s successive scattering of the clouds is like each conformity consciousness’s dispelling of the darkness concealing the truths; the person’s seeing the clear moon in a sky from which the clouds have vanished is like change-of-lineage knowledge’s seeing purified nibbāna when the darkness concealing the truths has been removed.
Just as the three winds can only scatter the clouds covering the moon and cannot see the moon, so the instances of conformity can only dispel the darkness concealing the truths and cannot see nibbāna. Just as the person can only see the moon and cannot scatter the clouds, so change-of-lineage knowledge can only see nibbāna and cannot dispel the defilement-darkness. It is precisely for this reason that it is called adverting to the path. Although it is not itself adverting, it stands in the position of adverting, gives the path a signal as though saying, “Arise in this way,” and then ceases. Without relinquishing the signal it has been given, the path immediately follows that knowledge in an unbroken continuity and arises piercing and splitting apart the aggregates of greed, hate, and delusion that have never before been pierced or split apart.
§4 The Archer Simile and the Nine Benefits of the Path 〔CSCD §809–810〕
Here is a simile. It is said that an archer set up one hundred boards at a distance of eight usabhas,² covered his face with cloth, readied bow and arrow, and stood on a revolving mechanism. Another person turned the mechanism and, when the boards came directly before the archer, gave a signal there with a stick. Without losing the stick’s signal, the archer released the arrow and pierced the one hundred boards. Here, the stick’s signal is like change-of-lineage knowledge, and the archer is like path knowledge. The archer’s piercing the hundred boards without losing the stick’s signal is like path knowledge, without losing the signal given by change-of-lineage knowledge, taking nibbāna as object and piercing and splitting apart the aggregates of greed, hate, and delusion that have never before been pierced or split apart.
This path not only pierces the aggregates of greed and the rest. It also dries up the ocean of suffering in the beginningless round, closes every door to bad destinations, brings the seven noble treasures into one’s presence, abandons the eightfold wrong path, stills every enmity and fear, brings one to the status of a true-born child at the breast of the Rightly and Fully Enlightened One, and leads to the acquisition of hundreds of other benefits. The knowledge associated with the path of stream-entry that bestows so many benefits is called knowledge in the path of stream-entry.
Here ends the account of first-path knowledge.
§5 The Number of Fruition Consciousnesses and the Stream-Enterer’s Five Reviews and the Nineteen Reviews 〔CSCD §811–812〕
Immediately after this knowledge, two or three fruition consciousnesses arise as its result. It is precisely because the result of supramundane wholesomeness is immediate that such statements are made as, “They call that concentration immediate,”³ and “One slowly attains the immediate [condition] leading to the destruction of the influxes.” Some, however, say that there are one, two, three, or four fruition consciousnesses; that should not be accepted.
For change-of-lineage knowledge arises at the end of the repetition of conformity, and so there must be at least two conformity consciousnesses. A single consciousness does not obtain repetition condition, and a cognitive process with one adverting has a maximum of seven consciousnesses. Therefore, for one who has two instances of conformity, the third is change-of-lineage and the fourth is path consciousness, leaving three fruition consciousnesses. For one who has three instances of conformity, the fourth is change-of-lineage and the fifth is path consciousness, leaving two fruition consciousnesses. Hence it was said, “Two or three fruition consciousnesses arise.”
Some say that, for one who has four instances of conformity, the fifth is change-of-lineage and the sixth is path consciousness, leaving one fruition consciousness. But this account has been rejected because absorption occurs only in the fourth or fifth consciousness and does not occur after that owing to the nearness of the life-continuum. It should therefore not be regarded as sound.
At this point the person becomes what is called a stream-enterer,⁵ the second noble person. Even if exceedingly negligent, after coursing and wandering at most seven times among devas and humans, the stream-enterer is capable of making an end of suffering. At the conclusion of fruition the mind descends into the life-continuum; then, interrupting the life-continuum, mind-door adverting arises for the purpose of reviewing the path. When that has ceased, seven impulsions reviewing the path occur in succession. After descending into the life-continuum again, adverting and the rest arise in the same manner to review fruition and the other objects. With their arising, the person reviews the path, reviews fruition, reviews the defilements abandoned, reviews the defilements remaining, and reviews nibbāna.
The person reviews the path thus: “I have indeed come by this path.” Then fruition: “This is the benefit I have obtained.” Then the defilements abandoned: “These are the defilements I have abandoned.” Then the defilements to be abandoned by the three higher paths: “These are the defilements remaining in me.” Finally the deathless nibbāna: “This is the Dhamma I have penetrated by way of the object.” Thus the noble disciple who is a stream-enterer has five reviews. As with the stream-enterer, so too with the once-returner and non-returner. The arahant, however, has no review of remaining defilements. Taken together, these are called the nineteen reviews.
This is only the highest limit. For trainees may or may not review the defilements abandoned and those remaining. It was precisely because this review was absent that Mahānāma asked the Blessed One, “What state remains unabandoned within me, such that at times states of greed obsess my mind?”—all of this should be understood in full.
Notes
¹ Not classed as either (abbohārika): the expression determining that change-of-lineage knowledge stands between purification by knowledge and vision of the way and purification by knowledge and vision without being counted under either.
² Usabha: an ancient Indian measure of distance. Here it indicates only how far away the archer stood; the treatise does not define its length, and this edition does not determine it on the treatise’s behalf.
³ Concentration (samādhi): the equal settling of mind and mental factors upon one object without distraction. According to its level, it has two stages: access concentration, in which the hindrances have been suppressed but absorption has not yet been entered, and absorption concentration, in which the mind has fully entered its object without wavering. Here, however, the cited “immediate concentration” refers to the concentration of the path.
⁴ Life-continuum: the underlying current of mental continuity, from which a cognitive process turns out when it begins and into which it descends again when the process ends. Its occurrence is explained in the chapter on the aggregates, in the unit on the consciousness aggregate.
⁵ Stream-enterer (sotāpanna): one who has entered the stream of the noble path. The treatise identifies this person as the second noble person, who makes an end of suffering within at most seven returns.
種姓智像跳大溝的人在半空放開了繩子——它已看見涅槃卻還不是道;道緊接著它,像射師不放開杖的信號、蒙著眼射穿一百張板,貫穿貪瞋癡三蘊;然後果心生起,然後回頭省察——「我實是由這道而來的」
大局 — 智見清淨開場:種姓・道・果・省察,四個心的一次心路
第二十一品末隨順智三心之後,本品開頭是種姓智:它在道之轉向的位置,不屬於行道智見清淨也不屬於智見清淨,居中不可言說,卻因落在觀之流仍稱為觀;四道之智才是智見清淨。初道智不需另作什麼——該作的在隨順為終的觀裡已作完;隨順三心使覆諦之粗中細闇隱沒,心於一切行不躍入不住立不著不黏,如水在蓮葉,一切以相與轉起為所緣者現為障礙——於是以無相・不轉起・無為・滅・涅槃為所緣,超越凡夫種姓入聖者種姓,於涅槃初轉初傾心初思念,以六緣為道之緣——種姓智生(§1)。三喻:渡溝(隨順抓繩躍起、身向彼岸傾趣臨、到彼岸上方放繩、搖晃落地——種姓已到彼岸但未站穩,道才站穩)(§2);月雲(三陣風吹散粗中細雲=三隨順除覆諦闇,有眼人見月=種姓見涅槃;風不能見月、人不能吹雲——各有所能所不能)(§3);射師(蒙眼立轉輪上,另一人以杖給信號,射師不放信號而射穿百板=道不放種姓之信號貫穿貪瞋癡三蘊)——道之九功德(§4)。末段:果心二或三(一或四之說不取)、入流者第二聖者極七返、五省察(道・果・已斷煩惱・餘殘煩惱・涅槃)、四聖者合十九省察、摩訶男之問(§5)。〔所見〕這裡是全弧減法之尺的兌現:道智以涅槃為所緣而斷結——前面每一品拆掉的(人・第一因・贗品・對諸行的抓取)在這一剎那被道「貫穿、破裂」。而減法的終點不是空無:道果之後的省察智回望所斷、所餘、與所證的涅槃——「這法是我從所緣上所通達的」。與第十七品同一句:這不是虛無,是止息。
§01 智見清淨之界與種姓智之生起 → 白話 §1
自此為種姓智:處道之轉向位,不屬行道智見清淨亦不屬智見清淨,唯在中間不可言說;落於觀之流故仍稱觀;四道之智為智見清淨。欲成初道智者無另應作——隨順為終之觀生起時已作;隨順三心隨其力使粗厚覆諦之闇隱沒,心於一切行不躍入不住立不勝解不著不黏不縛,如水在蓮葉退縮卷縮退轉;一切以相為所緣・以轉起為所緣者現為障礙——於隨順數習之末以無相・不轉起・無為・滅・涅槃為所緣,超凡夫之種姓名地入聖者之種姓名地,於涅槃所緣初轉初傾心初思念,依無間・等無間・數習・親依止・無有・離去六緣為道之緣,至於頂為觀之頂不復還——種姓智生。聖典:於外之出起與還轉之慧=種姓智——勝過生起乃至勝過惱、勝過外之諸行之相故種姓;躍入不生起乃至躍入不惱・滅・涅槃故種姓(白話 §1)。〔讀法〕種姓智的三個特徵:位置(在門檻上,兩邊都不算)、所緣(第一次以涅槃為所緣)、作用(超越凡夫種姓、給道作六種緣)。「初轉、初傾心、初思念」——三個「初」:這是心第一次朝涅槃轉。〔所見〕「想要成就初道智的人,並沒有另外什麼應當作的」——這一句是全弧最寬慰的一句:道不是一個要「做」出來的東西;該做的在前面二十一品全做完了,這裡是自然的。
§02 渡溝之喻——隨順與種姓於一心路之所緣之異 → 白話 §2
隨順與種姓以一轉向在一心路中轉起而所緣不同:如欲跳大溝立彼岸者急奔,抓此岸樹枝垂下之繩或竿躍起,身向彼岸傾趣臨,至彼岸上方放繩,搖晃落地慢慢站穩;瑜伽者欲立於作為諸有生趣住居彼岸之涅槃,以生滅隨觀等急奔,以隨順之轉向抓自體樹枝垂下之色繩或受等之竿取為無常苦無我不放,第一隨順心躍起,第二隨順心心向涅槃傾趣臨,第三隨順心接近所應得之涅槃;隨其滅放開以行為所緣者,以種姓心落於無為涅槃之彼岸;一所緣未得數習故如搖晃者未善立,此後以道智而立(白話 §2)。〔讀法〕這一喻把「一心路兩種所緣」講得可以看見:繩子(諸行)從此岸垂下,人抓著繩子躍起、傾向彼岸、到彼岸上方——這三步是隨順三心;放手落地——是種姓;站穩——是道。〔所見〕「並不放開它」——三個隨順心都還抓著諸行(無常苦無我),是靠著諸行的力量往涅槃盪過去的;種姓才放手。這一句對修行者很重要:入道前不能提早放掉三相,放早了就掉溝裡。
§03 隨順與種姓之分工——月雲之喻 → 白話 §3
隨順能除覆諦之煩惱闇而不能以涅槃為所緣;種姓能唯以涅槃為所緣而不能除覆諦之闇。喻:有眼者夜出仰望欲知星宿之合,月為雲覆不現;一風吹散粗雲、二風吹中雲、三風吹細雲,於雲散之空見月知星宿之合——三雲=覆諦之粗中細三重煩惱闇,三風=三隨順心,有眼人=種姓智,月=涅槃;風唯能吹雲不能見月=隨順唯除闇不見涅槃,人唯能見月不能吹雲=種姓唯見涅槃不除闇。故名道之轉向:非轉向而立於轉向位,如對道說「你要這樣生起」給信號而滅;道不放其信號,以無間相續接續,貫穿破裂先未貫穿之貪蘊瞋蘊癡蘊而生(白話 §3)。〔讀法〕分工要記清:隨順=吹雲的風(除闇、不見月);種姓=有眼的人(見月、不吹雲);道=下一節的射師(貫穿)。三者缺一不可,各做一件。〔所見〕「有眼的人想著『我要知道星宿之合』」——他仰望不是為了看月本身,是為了知道星宿的位置;同樣種姓見涅槃是為了給道信號。這個小細節說明種姓智是「服務性的」:它是最短暫、最不居功的一個心。
§04 射師之喻與道之九功德 → 白話 §4
射師於八烏薩婆之地立百板,布蒙面,張弓搭箭立於轉輪機關上;另一人轉輪,板正對射師時以杖給信號;射師不放杖之信號放箭射穿百板——杖之信號=種姓智、射師=道智;不放信號射穿百板=道智不放種姓之信號以涅槃為所緣貫穿破裂貪瞋癡三蘊。道不只貫穿貪蘊等,更枯竭無始輪迴之苦海、關閉一切惡趣之門、令七聖財現前、捨斷八支邪道、止息一切怨與怖畏、令得為正等覺者之胸生子之地位、導向其餘數百功德——與此入流道相應之智=入流道之智。〔初道智竟〕(白話 §4)。〔讀法〕射師蒙著眼——道不「看」涅槃的樣子,它靠種姓的信號射;一箭穿百板——一剎那斷三蘊。九功德讀一遍:枯竭苦海・關惡趣門・七聖財現前・斷八邪道・止怨與怖・成佛之胸生子……〔所見〕「令得為正等覺者之胸生子的地位」——入流者是佛的親生子;這一句與全書第一品開頭那位「住於戒的有慧者」遙遙相對:從一個住立於戒的人到佛的胸生子,二十二品的路在此接上。
§05 果心之數與入流者之五省察・十九省察 → 白話 §5
道智後無間二或三果心(出世間善之異熟無間——「那定是無間的」「遲得無間而至諸漏盡」);一二三四之說不取。種姓生於隨順數習之末故至少二隨順;一心不得數習之緣而一轉向之心路極於七心:二隨順者第三種姓第四道三果心;三隨順者第四種姓第五道二果心;四隨順者第五種姓第六道一果之說,以安止唯在第四或第五、其後近有分不再安止,已遮止不取。至此成入流者・第二聖者,極放逸亦至多七返天人而作苦之邊際。果終心落有分,切斷有分為省察道生意門轉向,七速行省察道;再落有分依次省察果等——省察道(我實由此道來)、果(此是我所得功德)、已斷煩惱(我所斷者是這些)、餘殘煩惱(上三道所應斷者是這些)、涅槃(此法是我從所緣上所通達的)——入流五省察;一來不還同;阿羅漢無餘殘之省察——合十九省察;此唯最上之限:已斷與餘殘之省察於有學或有或無——摩訶男問世尊「我內心有何法未斷,以致有時為貪法所纏心」(白話 §5)。〔讀法〕心路的算術:七心一路:隨順二或三+種姓一+道一+果三或二——加起來是七。論主用這個算術否定「四隨順一果」與「四果」之說。五省察是道果之後的回頭看:來路・所得・所斷・所餘・所證。〔所見〕「入流者即使極為放逸,也至多七返」——這是全弧「腳已踩在對的地上」(19-01 小須陀洹)的正式版:從此不會退。而摩訶男之問是一筆極誠實的旁證:有學不一定知道自己還剩哪些煩惱——省察智不是全知,是可能有可能沒有的回望。論主把這一則放在品初,是替讀者卸下「證了就什麼都知道」的想像。
給一般讀者
三個譬喻連起來就是入道的一剎那:跳大溝——抓著諸行的繩子(無常苦無我)盪向涅槃那岸,三個隨順心是抓著繩子躍起、傾過去、到對岸上方;種姓智是放手落地,還沒站穩;道才站穩。月與雲——隨順是吹雲的風,種姓是見月的人,各做一件。蒙眼射師——道不放種姓的信號,一箭穿百板:貫穿貪瞋癡三蘊。然後回頭看:我由這道來、我得了這果、我斷了這些、還剩這些、我通達了那個法。這是減法的兌現——而終點不是空無,是被通達的止息。還有一句安慰:入流者即使極為放逸,也至多七返;腳踩上去,就不會退。
想讀本單元全文:白話 §1–§5 即智見清淨之界與種姓智、渡溝之喻、月雲之喻、射師之喻與道之九功德、果心之數與五省察十九省察的全段逐段全譯。
Change-of-lineage knowledge is like a person letting go of the rope in midair while leaping a great ditch—it has seen nibbāna but is not yet the path; the path follows immediately, like a blindfolded archer who, without losing the stick’s signal, shoots through a hundred boards and pierces the aggregates of greed, hate, and delusion; fruition consciousnesses then arise, followed by the backward look—“I have indeed come by this path”
The Big Picture — The Opening of Purification by Knowledge and Vision: Change-of-Lineage, Path, Fruition, and Reviewing Within a Single Cognitive Process
After the three conformity consciousnesses at the end of Chapter 21, this chapter opens with change-of-lineage knowledge. It occupies the position of adverting to the path, belongs neither to purification by knowledge and vision of the way nor to purification by knowledge and vision, and is not classed under either while standing between them; yet, because it falls within the stream of insight, it is still called insight. The knowledge in the four paths alone is purification by knowledge and vision. First-path knowledge requires nothing further to be done—what had to be done was completed in the insight ending in conformity. The three conformity consciousnesses make the gross, medium, and fine darkness concealing the truths disappear; the mind does not plunge into, stand upon, adhere to, or cling to any formation, like water on a lotus leaf, and everything having the sign and occurrence as object manifests as an impediment. It therefore takes the signless, non-occurrence, the unformed, cessation, and nibbāna as object, crosses beyond the ordinary person’s lineage into the lineage of the noble ones, and makes its first turning, first inclination, and first directing of attention toward nibbāna, serving as condition for the path in six modes—change-of-lineage knowledge arises (§1). Three similes follow: crossing a ditch (conformity grasps the rope and leaps; the body inclines, tends, and leans toward the far bank; above the bank the rope is released; the person lands swaying—change-of-lineage has reached the far bank but is not yet steady, while the path gains firm footing) (§2); the moon and clouds (three winds disperse the gross, medium, and fine clouds—the three instances of conformity remove the darkness concealing the truths; the person with sight sees the moon—change-of-lineage sees nibbāna; the winds cannot see the moon and the person cannot disperse the clouds, each having what it can and cannot do) (§3); and the archer (blindfolded on a revolving mechanism, the archer receives another person’s stick signal and, without losing it, shoots through a hundred boards—the path, without losing change-of-lineage’s signal, pierces the three aggregates of greed, hate, and delusion), followed by the path’s nine benefits (§4). The close gives two or three fruition consciousnesses (rejecting accounts of one or four), the stream-enterer as the second noble person who returns at most seven times, five reviews (path, fruition, abandoned defilements, remaining defilements, and nibbāna), nineteen reviews across the four noble persons, and Mahānāma’s question (§5). [What is seen] Here the measuring rule of subtraction across the entire arc is fulfilled: path knowledge takes nibbāna as object and cuts the fetters—what each preceding chapter dismantled (person, first cause, counterfeit, and grasping at formations) is pierced and split apart by the path in this instant. Yet subtraction does not end in nothingness. After path and fruition, reviewing knowledge looks back upon what was abandoned, what remains, and the nibbāna realized—“This is the Dhamma I have penetrated by way of the object.” This is the same statement as in Chapter 17: not annihilation, but stilling.
§01 The Scope of Purification by Knowledge and Vision and the Arising of Change-of-Lineage Knowledge → Vernacular §1
From this point comes change-of-lineage knowledge. It occupies the position of adverting to the path, belongs neither to purification by knowledge and vision of the way nor to purification by knowledge and vision, and is not classed under either while standing between them; because it falls within the stream of insight, it is still called insight. The knowledge in the four paths is purification by knowledge and vision. One who wishes to accomplish first-path knowledge has nothing further to do—everything was done when insight ending in conformity arose. The three conformity consciousnesses, each according to its strength, make the gross darkness concealing the truths disappear; the mind neither plunges into nor stands upon, resolves upon, adheres to, clings to, or becomes bound to any formation. Like water on a lotus leaf, it draws back, contracts, and recoils; everything having the sign or occurrence as object manifests as an impediment. At the end of conformity’s repetition, it takes the signless, non-occurrence, the unformed, cessation, and nibbāna as object; crosses beyond the ordinary person’s lineage, designation, and plane into the lineage, designation, and plane of the noble ones; makes its first turning, first inclination, and first directing of attention toward nibbāna as object; serves as condition for the path through proximity, contiguity, repetition, decisive support, absence, and disappearance; reaches the summit, becomes insight’s summit, and does not return—change-of-lineage knowledge arises. The canonical text says that the understanding of emergence outwardly and of turning away is change-of-lineage knowledge: it is change-of-lineage because it surmounts the range from arising up to distress and the sign of formations outwardly, and because it plunges into the range from non-arising up to non-distress, cessation, and nibbāna (Vernacular §1). [How to read] Change-of-lineage knowledge has three features: position (on the threshold, counted on neither side), object (taking nibbāna as object for the first time), and function (surmounting the ordinary person’s lineage and serving as condition for the path in six modes). “First turning, first inclination, first directing of attention”—three “firsts”: for the first time, the mind turns toward nibbāna. [What is seen] “One who wishes to accomplish first-path knowledge has nothing further to do”—this is the most reassuring sentence in the entire arc. The path is not something to be “made”; everything to be done was completed in the preceding twenty-one chapters, and here the result follows naturally.
§02 The Simile of Crossing a Ditch—The Difference in Object Between Conformity and Change-of-Lineage Within One Cognitive Process → Vernacular §2
Conformity and change-of-lineage occur with one adverting in one cognitive process, but upon different objects. A person wishing to leap a great ditch and stand on the far bank runs swiftly, grasps a rope or pole hanging from a branch on the near bank, leaps, inclines, tends, and leans toward the far bank, releases the rope above it, lands swaying, and slowly gains firm footing. Likewise, wishing to stand in nibbāna—the far bank of the kinds of existence, birth, destination, station, and abode—the meditator runs swiftly through contemplation of arising and passing away and the rest, grasps with the adverting of conformity the rope of materiality hanging from the tree branch of the individual existence or a pole consisting of feeling or another aggregate, and takes it as impermanent, suffering, or not-self without releasing it. With the first conformity consciousness the meditator leaps; with the second the mind inclines, tends, and leans toward nibbāna; with the third the meditator comes close to the nibbāna now to be attained. With its cessation, the formations-object is released and change-of-lineage consciousness falls upon the unformed nibbāna that is the far bank. Because repetition has not been obtained on the single object, however, it is not yet firmly established, like the person who is swaying; firm establishment comes afterward with path knowledge (Vernacular §2). [How to read] The simile makes “two objects within one cognitive process” visible: the rope (formations) hangs from the near bank; grasping it, the person leaps, inclines toward the far bank, and reaches a point above it—these three steps are the three conformity consciousnesses; letting go and landing is change-of-lineage; gaining firm footing is the path. [What is seen] “Without releasing it”—all three conformity consciousnesses still hold formations (impermanence, suffering, and not-self); the strength of formations swings the mind toward nibbāna. Change-of-lineage alone lets go. This sentence matters for practice: before entry upon the path, one cannot release the three characteristics too soon; an early release drops one into the ditch.
§03 The Division of Work Between Conformity and Change-of-Lineage—The Simile of the Moon and Clouds → Vernacular §3
Conformity can dispel the defilement-darkness concealing the truths but cannot take nibbāna as object; change-of-lineage can take only nibbāna as object but cannot dispel that darkness. The simile is of a person with sight who goes out at night to determine the conjunction of the stars, looks upward, and cannot see the moon because it is covered by clouds. A first wind disperses gross clouds, a second medium clouds, and a third fine clouds; in the cloudless sky the person sees the moon and determines the conjunction of the stars. The three clouds are the gross, medium, and fine darkness concealing the truths; the three winds are the three conformity consciousnesses; the person with sight is change-of-lineage knowledge; and the moon is nibbāna. The winds can only disperse clouds and cannot see the moon—conformity only dispels darkness and does not see nibbāna. The person can only see the moon and cannot disperse clouds—change-of-lineage only sees nibbāna and does not remove darkness. Hence it is called adverting to the path: without itself being adverting, it occupies adverting’s position, gives the path a signal as though saying, “Arise in this way,” and ceases. The path, without losing that signal, follows in immediate continuity and arises piercing and splitting apart the aggregates of greed, hate, and delusion that have never before been pierced (Vernacular §3). [How to read] Keep the division of labor clear: conformity is the wind that scatters clouds (it removes darkness but does not see the moon); change-of-lineage is the person with sight (who sees the moon but does not scatter clouds); the path is the archer in the next section (which pierces). Each does one thing, and none is dispensable. [What is seen] “The person with sight thinks, ‘I shall determine the conjunction of the stars.’” The person looks up not merely to see the moon, but to determine the stars’ positions; likewise, change-of-lineage sees nibbāna in order to signal the path. This small detail shows that change-of-lineage knowledge is “in service”: it is the most fleeting and least self-claiming of consciousnesses.
§04 The Archer Simile and the Nine Benefits of the Path → Vernacular §4
An archer sets up one hundred boards at a distance of eight usabhas, covers his face with cloth, readies bow and arrow, and stands on a revolving mechanism. Another person turns it and gives a stick signal when the boards face the archer. Without losing the signal, the archer releases the arrow and pierces the hundred boards. The stick’s signal is change-of-lineage knowledge; the archer is path knowledge; piercing the hundred boards without losing the signal is path knowledge, without losing the signal given by change-of-lineage, taking nibbāna as object and piercing and splitting apart the aggregates of greed, hate, and delusion. The path not only pierces the aggregates of greed and the rest; it dries up the ocean of suffering in the beginningless round, closes every door to bad destinations, brings the seven noble treasures into one’s presence, abandons the eightfold wrong path, stills enmity and fear, gives one the status of a true-born child at the breast of the Rightly and Fully Enlightened One, and leads to hundreds of other benefits. Knowledge associated with this path of stream-entry is knowledge in the path of stream-entry. [Here ends the account of first-path knowledge] (Vernacular §4). [How to read] The archer is blindfolded—the path does not “look” at nibbāna’s appearance; it shoots by change-of-lineage’s signal. One arrow goes through a hundred boards—one moment cuts through three aggregates. Read the nine benefits in order: drying the ocean of suffering, closing the doors to bad destinations, making the seven noble treasures present, abandoning the eightfold wrong path, stilling enmity and fear, becoming the Buddha’s true-born child at the breast … [What is seen] “Brings one to the status of a true-born child at the breast of the Rightly and Fully Enlightened One”—the stream-enterer is the Buddha’s own child. This sentence answers the wise person “established in virtue” at the opening of Chapter 1 from afar: from a person established in virtue to the Buddha’s true-born child, the road of twenty-two chapters joins here.
§05 The Number of Fruition Consciousnesses and the Stream-Enterer’s Five Reviews and the Nineteen Reviews → Vernacular §5
Immediately after path knowledge come two or three fruition consciousnesses, since supramundane wholesome result is immediate—“that concentration is immediate” and “one slowly attains the immediate [condition] leading to the destruction of the influxes”; the accounts of one, two, three, or four should not be accepted. Because change-of-lineage arises at the end of conformity’s repetition, there must be at least two conformity consciousnesses: one consciousness cannot obtain repetition condition, and a cognitive process with one adverting has at most seven consciousnesses. With two instances of conformity, the third is change-of-lineage, the fourth path, and three are fruition; with three instances of conformity, the fourth is change-of-lineage, the fifth path, and two are fruition. The account of four instances of conformity, with change-of-lineage fifth, path sixth, and one fruition consciousness, is rejected because absorption occurs only in the fourth or fifth consciousness and, after that, no longer occurs owing to the nearness of the life-continuum. At this point the person becomes a stream-enterer, the second noble person, and, even if exceedingly negligent, makes an end of suffering within at most seven returns among devas and humans. At fruition’s end the mind descends into the life-continuum; interrupting it, mind-door adverting arises to review the path, followed by seven impulsions reviewing the path. It descends into the life-continuum again, and in sequence reviews fruition and the rest—the path (“I have indeed come by this path”), fruition (“This is the benefit I have obtained”), abandoned defilements (“These are what I abandoned”), remaining defilements (“These are what the three higher paths must abandon”), and nibbāna (“This is the Dhamma I have penetrated by way of the object”). These are the stream-enterer’s five reviews; once-returners and non-returners have the same, while arahants have no review of remaining defilements—nineteen in all. This is only the highest limit, for trainees may or may not review abandoned and remaining defilements. Mahānāma therefore asked the Blessed One, “What state remains unabandoned within me, such that states of greed sometimes obsess my mind?” (Vernacular §5). [How to read] The arithmetic of the cognitive process is seven consciousnesses in one process: two or three conformity + one change-of-lineage + one path + three or two fruition—the sum is seven. The Commentator uses this arithmetic to reject both “four conformity and one fruition” and “four fruition.” The five reviews are the backward look after path and fruition: the road traveled, what was gained, what was abandoned, what remains, and what was realized. [What is seen] “Even if exceedingly negligent, a stream-enterer returns at most seven times”—this is the formal version of “the foot has landed on the right ground” (19-01, lesser stream-enterer): from here there is no falling back. Mahānāma’s question provides a remarkably honest corroboration: a trainee does not necessarily know which defilements remain—reviewing knowledge is not omniscience, but a backward look that may or may not occur. The Commentator places this at the chapter’s opening to remove the reader’s imagining that “once attainment occurs, everything is known.”
For the General Reader
The three similes together portray the instant of entering the path. Leaping a great ditch—holding the rope of formations (impermanence, suffering, and not-self) and swinging toward nibbāna’s bank: the three conformity consciousnesses are grasping the rope and leaping, inclining across, and arriving above the far bank; change-of-lineage knowledge lets go and lands but is not yet steady; the path gains firm footing. The moon and clouds—conformity is the wind that scatters clouds, change-of-lineage the person who sees the moon; each does one thing. The blindfolded archer—the path, without losing change-of-lineage’s signal, shoots one arrow through a hundred boards and pierces the aggregates of greed, hate, and delusion. Then comes the backward look: I came by this path; I attained this fruit; I abandoned these; these remain; I penetrated that Dhamma. This fulfills subtraction, yet it does not end in nothingness—it ends in stilling that has been realized. One further reassurance: even if exceedingly negligent, a stream-enterer returns at most seven times; once the foot has landed, it does not fall back.
To read this unit in full: Vernacular §§1–5 give the complete paragraph-by-paragraph rendering of the scope of purification by knowledge and vision and change-of-lineage knowledge, the ditch-crossing simile, the moon-and-clouds simile, the archer simile and the path’s nine benefits, the number of fruition consciousnesses, and the five and nineteen reviews.
考據Apparatus
一、科判定位
譯底 本單元之譯底=CSCD(內用不上站)。本層一切巴利逐字取自本單元原典欄之譯底,定位一式:〔CSCD §NN〕式對譯底欄逐字可核。本品無自家對頁之巴利,故頁域一概不記。
篇名 譯底欄自帶 ### 行 3 個:其一為品題行 ### 22. Ñāṇadassanavisuddhiniddeso(品題歸首單元之律,不入讀者面題名),其二為 ### Paṭhamamaggañāṇakathā,其三為 ### Sotāpannapuggalakathā——本單元承二科(讀者面題名取首科之題)。
段號域 譯底欄之段號自〔CSCD §806〕至〔CSCD §812〕,實落段號 7 個,無缺無重。本篇於譯底欄之幅為 9,978 位元組——為本品七單元中第二長之篇(次於所斷法之斷之單元之 16,210)。
篇之骨——五層 ①〔CSCD §806〕立本品之界:四道之智為智見清淨,而種姓智不屬前後二清淨,antarā abbohārikameva hoti(於中間不可言說);次述種姓智之生起與其六種緣;②〔CSCD §807〕以渡溝之喻明隨順三心與種姓心於一心路中所緣之異;③〔CSCD §808〕辨隨順與種姓之分工——隨順能除覆諦之闇而不能緣涅槃,種姓能緣涅槃而不能除闇,並以月雲之喻明之;④〔CSCD §809〕以射師之喻明「種姓與道之相承」,〔CSCD §810〕列道之九功德;⑤〔CSCD §811〕至〔CSCD §812〕為第二科:果心之數(二或三)與諸師異說之破,入流者之位與其七返,末立五省察與十九省察。
論主自標之破 〔CSCD §811〕Keci pana ekaṃ dve tīṇi cattāri vā phalacittānīti vadanti, taṃ na gahetabbaṃ.(有諸師言一二三四果心者,其說不可取)——本篇之破之句;其理據為 sattacittaparamā ca ekāvajjanavīthi(一轉向之心路極於七心)。〔CSCD §811〕之末復破第二說(Keci pana yassa cattāri anulomāni, tassa pañcamaṃ gotrabhu),而以 Tasmā na sārato paccetabbaṃ(故不應以為實)收。
篇末之收與二科之界 第一科收於一縮排之句 Paṭhamamaggañāṇaṃ niṭṭhitaṃ.(初道智竟),其後即為第二科之題行;第二科無收句而以摩訶男之問收——本品七單元之中,收句之有無不一(見目六)。
前後接點 前承隨順智・至出起觀之單元:本篇首句 Ito paraṃ gotrabhuñāṇaṃ hoti(自此以後為種姓智)之「自此以後」,即彼篇末所立之界。後接第二三四道智・阿羅漢之單元:本篇末所立之省察,即次篇 Evaṃ paccavekkhitvā pana so sotāpanno ariyasāvako 之所承——「如是省察已」一語為二篇之接,而其式於次篇之內復二見(配第三第四道)。
movement 品夾《總覽》繫本單元於 §E〈智見清淨(第 22 品)— 四道四果,斷結〉;其所繫之章§逐字見該表,本目不重錄、不截取——段號與章§二系不明對映,不推估不換算。本品七單元皆繫此一節。
二、詞義與譯語
本目只記本篇用法與其定位;名相定讀以規範詞表為準,詞表所未定者,本目不代定。前此諸品或本品前單元已立之讀不重解——本篇所涉者為 vipassanā(觀)・anuloma(隨順)・saṅkhāra(行)・nibbāna(涅槃)・bhavaṅga(有分)・javana(速行)・magga(道)等。以下唯列本篇新出者。
智見清淨與種姓智〔CSCD §806〕–〔CSCD §808〕
| 巴利 | 本編用語 | 本篇用法之要 | 定位 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ñāṇadassanavisuddhi | 智見清淨 | 本品之名:imesu pana catūsu maggesu ñāṇaṃ ñāṇadassanavisuddhi nāma | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| gotrabhuñāṇa | 種姓智 | 本篇之樞:其位不屬二清淨,論自標 maggassa āvajjanaṭṭhāniyattā(以其在道之轉向之位故) | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| abbohārika | 不可言說 | 種姓智之位之判語:於二清淨之間而不入其數 | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| vipassanāsota | 觀之流 | 種姓智所以仍名為觀之由:Vipassanāsote patitattā | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| saccapaṭicchādaka tama | 覆諦之闇 | 隨順三心所除者,實測其諸形 5 見 | 〔CSCD §806〕・〔CSCD §808〕 |
| puthujjanagotta・puthujjanasaṅkhā・puthujjanabhūmi | 凡夫之種姓・凡夫之名・凡夫之地 | 種姓智所超越之三;其對為 ariyagottaṃ ariyasaṅkhaṃ ariyabhūmiṃ | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| paṭhamāvaṭṭana・paṭhamābhoga・paṭhamasamannāhāra | 初轉・初傾心・初思念 | 種姓智於涅槃所緣之三「初」 | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| anantara・samanantara・āsevana・upanissaya・natthi・vigata | 無間・等無間・數習・親依止・無有・離去 | 種姓智為道之緣之六種:chahi ākārehi paccayabhāvaṃ sādhayamānaṃ | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| muddhabhūta | 為頂 | 種姓智為觀之頂;與 sikhāppattaṃ 並舉 | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| apunarāvaṭṭaka | 不復還 | 種姓智之相 | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| ekāvajjana ekavīthi | 一轉向・一心路 | 隨順與種姓同在一心路而所緣異之判 | 〔CSCD §807〕 |
| visaṅkhāra | 無為 | 涅槃之名之一,與 animittaṃ appavattaṃ・nirodhaṃ 並舉 | 〔CSCD §806〕・〔CSCD §807〕 |
道之功德與果心〔CSCD §810〕–〔CSCD §811〕
| 巴利 | 本編用語 | 本篇用法之要 | 定位 |
|---|---|---|---|
| lobhakkhandha・dosakkhandha・mohakkhandha | 貪蘊・瞋蘊・癡蘊 | 道所貫穿破裂者,實測 2 見(其一作 lobhadosamohakkhandhānaṃ) | 〔CSCD §808〕・〔CSCD §809〕 |
| anibbiddhapubba・apadālitapubba | 先未貫穿・先未破裂 | 二語連舉,狀三蘊 | 〔CSCD §808〕・〔CSCD §809〕 |
| anamataggasaṃsāravaṭṭadukkhasamudda | 無始輪迴之苦海 | 道所枯竭者——九功德之第二 | 〔CSCD §810〕 |
| satta ariyadhanāni | 七聖財 | 道所令現前者——九功德之第四 | 〔CSCD §810〕 |
| aṭṭhaṅgika micchāmagga | 八支邪道 | 道所捨者——九功德之第五 | 〔CSCD §810〕 |
| orasaputtabhāva | 胸生子之位 | 道所令得者:為正等覺者之胸生子——九功德之第七 | 〔CSCD §810〕 |
| anantaravipāka | 無間異熟 | 出世善之相:其果無間而生 | 〔CSCD §811〕 |
| āsevanapaccaya | 數習緣 | 論破「一隨順」之說之據:一心不得數習緣 | 〔CSCD §811〕 |
入流者與省察〔CSCD §812〕
| 巴利 | 本編用語 | 本篇用法之要 | 定位 |
|---|---|---|---|
| sotāpanna | 入流者 | 第二聖者;論自標其 sattakkhattuṃ devesu ca manussesu ca sandhāvitvā saṃsaritvā dukkhassantassa karaṇasamattho | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
| maggapaccavekkhaṇa | 省察道 | 五省察之第一 | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
| pahīnakilesa・avasiṭṭhakilesa | 已斷之煩惱・餘殘之煩惱 | 五省察之第三第四 | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
| pañca paccavekkhaṇāni | 五省察 | 入流・一來・不還三者各五 | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
| ekūnavīsati paccavekkhaṇāni | 十九省察 | 本篇之數之判:三聖者各五=十五,阿羅漢無「餘殘煩惱之省察」故唯四,合十九 | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
| ukkaṭṭhapariccheda | 最上之限 | 論自標十九之數為「最上之限」:有學之「已斷餘殘」二省察或有或無 | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
論主自標之限與其證 〔CSCD §812〕Ukkaṭṭhaparicchedoyeva ceso. Pahīnāvasiṭṭhakilesapaccavekkhaṇañhi sekkhānampi hoti vā na vā.——十九之數非定數而為最上之限;其證為摩訶男問世尊「何法未斷於內,故我一時為貪法所纏心」一事(kosu nāma me dhammo ajjhattaṃ appahīno)。論以「無此省察」釋摩訶男之所以問——本目逐字錄其位而不代釋其義。
本編用語與本編既有校讀相左之一處(誌其由) 本編既有校讀 §E 立道果後起之智作「反照智(paccavekkhaṇa)」,而規範詞表定 paccavekkhaṇa-ñāṇa=「省察智」;本目與本篇之諸列(五省察・十九省察・省察道等)從規範詞表作「省察」。同語二讀,本欄誌其實而不自裁——以俟來哲。
三、異讀
材料之面 本篇無自家對頁之巴利,故無校勘段可錄;可查之面唯譯底欄自身。誌錄不判。
普查之實測 譯底欄全篇逐字普查:異讀括注式((sī.)・(syā.)・(kaṃ.)・(pī.) 等)零命中;異誦之標識詞 pāṭho 零命中;異說之標識詞 porāṇā 零命中。方括注唯二式(段號 7 個與版頁記 10 個,後者皆在註記之內)。圓括注 4 處,逐一為出處標記,無非出處之括注。引號 '' 實測 24 處為偶數,逐一成對。
本品段號域之正面記載(就全品之域,本目記之,他六篇不重記) 本品譯底欄之段號自〔CSCD §806〕至〔CSCD §853〕,實落 47 個而其域當 48——〔CSCD §839〕一號不落。其詳見遍知等之作用之單元之目三校記(本編已對源之標記檔逐字核之:其段在源而唯號無文,本編清檔之「空段不出」律連號略之,源不缺)。除此一號之外,本品之號無缺、無重、無降序階。本欄之判為字面之判,非教義之判。
本欄之界 上列皆為譯底欄之字面之實;未與 PTS 掃描頁對勘。本欄之零命中唯就譯底欄一面,不以之推斷他本。
四、論主引據
論主自引之處,逐處繫段號錨;出處唯本文自標者記之,不代考定。「本文自標之出處」欄之括注逐字照錄,不代譯其經名。
| 位置 | 引式〔逐字〕 | 所引之要 | 本文自標之出處 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 〔CSCD §806〕 | Yaṃ sandhāya vuttaṃ –/''Kathaṃ +版頁記+ bahiddhā vuṭṭhānavivaṭṭane paññā gotrabhuñāṇaṃ? | 種姓智之定義問答:勝生起而入不生 | (paṭi. ma. 1.59) |
| 〔CSCD §811〕 | ''samādhimānantarikaññamāhū''ti | 「說無間之定」——證出世善之異熟無間 | (khu. pā. 6.5) |
| 〔CSCD §811〕 | ''dandhaṃ ānantarikaṃ pāpuṇāti āsavānaṃ khayāyā''ti | 「遲得無間而漏盡」——同上之第二證 | (a. ni. 4.162) |
| 〔CSCD §812〕 | ''kosu nāma me dhammo ajjhattaṃ appahīno, yena me ekadā lobhadhammāpi cittaṃ pariyādāya tiṭṭhantī''ti | 摩訶男之問——證有學之「餘殘煩惱之省察」或有或無 | (ma. ni. 1.175) |
引之用〔本欄實測〕 本篇之引 4 處:一為本智之定義(繫於種姓智之立),三為理據之證(二證無間、一證省察之非定)。四引之三皆以 ādi vuttaṃ/vitthārato veditabbaṃ/sabbaṃ vitthāretabbaṃ 之式收——論自標其引之未盡而令讀者自廣,三處逐一可核。Yathāha・Vuttaṃ hetaṃ・Vuttampi cetaṃ・porāṇā 俱零命中;Tena vuttaṃ 1 見(〔CSCD §811〕回提果心之數之處);kira 2 見,皆為喻之開場(eko kira cakkhumā puriso・eko kira issāso)。此數唯就本篇之域,不及全書。
五、譬喻·修辭
本目只記本篇譬喻之所在與其所配,不作文學評價。
甲・譬喻 本篇之比況語實測:viya 詞界 14 見、upamā 諸形 3 見、Yathā hi 1 見、sadisa 諸形 零命中。本篇之喻三而其配十四——三喻皆為敘事喻,各配一事。
| 位置 | 譬喻 | 所配之義 |
|---|---|---|
| 〔CSCD §807〕 | yathā hi mahāmātikaṃ laṅghitvā paratīre patiṭṭhātukāmo puriso vegena dhāvitvā mātikāya orimatīre rukkhasākhāya bandhitvā olambitaṃ rajjuṃ vā yaṭṭhiṃ vā gahetvā ullaṅghitvā | 渡溝之喻:欲至彼岸者執繫於此岸樹枝之繩或杖而躍,至彼岸上方乃放之而落——明隨順三心猶執行之所緣而種姓心方捨之入涅槃 |
| 〔CSCD §808〕 | eko kira cakkhumā puriso ''nakkhattayogaṃ jānissāmī''ti rattibhāge nikkhamitvā candaṃ passituṃ uddhaṃ ullokesi | 月雲之喻:三風次第破粗中細三雲而後見月——三隨順心除三重覆諦之闇,種姓智乃見涅槃 |
| 〔CSCD §809〕 | eko kira issāso aṭṭhausabhamatte padese phalakasataṃ ṭhapāpetvā vatthena mukhaṃ veṭhetvā saraṃ sannahitvā cakkayante aṭṭhāsi | 射師之喻:蒙目之射師依他人以杖為號而射穿百板——明道智不捨種姓智所與之號而貫穿三蘊 |
三喻之配之數〔本欄實測〕 渡溝喻之配 5 目(繩杖=所緣之行・第一隨順=躍・第二=身傾彼岸・第三=至彼岸上方・種姓=落於彼岸);月雲喻之配 6 目(三雲=三重之闇・三風=三隨順心・有眼者=種姓智・月=涅槃・破雲=除闇・見月=見涅槃);射師喻之配 2 目(杖之號=種姓智・射師=道智)而其配句復以一長句總之。三喻之配之數不齊而其配句之式全同(皆以 viya 逐一相對)。
乙・修辭之可核觀察 ①否定之連舉為〔CSCD §806〕之骨:na pakkhandati, na santiṭṭhati, nādhimuccati, na sajjati, na laggati, na bajjhati 六否定連下,其後即以蓮葉水滴之喻收(Padumapalāsato udakaṃ viya patilīyati patikuṭati pativattati)——與行捨智之單元之四連語同族而此處省其第四。②? 全篇 1 見(所引之文之問)。③Tena vuttaṃ 之收 1 見、vuccati 1 見。④縮排之行 19 行,其中所引之文之行與二收句居多。⑤〔CSCD §810〕之九功德以 karoti/pidahati/pajahati/vūpasameti/upaneti/saṃvattatīti 六動詞逐一收之,九句平行而動詞不重複用於同一目。⑥paccavekkhati 10 見(省察一語之屈折諸形合 18 見),皆在五省察之立與其逐一列舉之內。
以上諸數唯就本篇之域實測,不及全書。
六、章內互讀
每指皆帶段號錨;所指之處唯就本篇文中可核之名相立——本篇之段號與章§二系不明對映,故所指不繫章§,亦不推估換算。不代考定。
| 本篇之處 | 所指 | 可核之由 |
|---|---|---|
〔CSCD §806〕 Ito paraṃ gotrabhuñāṇaṃ hoti | 隨順智・至出起觀之單元〔CSCD §805〕 | 彼篇以 Sabbena sabbaṃ pana gotrabhuñāṇaṃ vuṭṭhānagāminiyā vipassanāya pariyosānaṃ 立界,本篇即承其位 |
〔CSCD §806〕 ''Kathaṃ +版頁記+ bahiddhā vuṭṭhānavivaṭṭane paññā gotrabhuñāṇaṃ? | 出起與力之相應之單元〔CSCD §827〕 | 彼篇引同一聖典之同一句(bahiddhāvuṭṭhānavivaṭṭane paññā gotrabhuñāṇa)而以之立「種姓唯一向出起」之判——二篇同引而其用不同 |
〔CSCD §806〕 puthujjanagottaṃ puthujjanasaṅkhaṃ puthujjanabhūmiṃ atikkamamānaṃ | 遍知等之分別・品末之單元〔CSCD §849〕 | 彼篇列十三種彼分斷而以 Anulomena saccapaṭilomagāhassa 收,其序與本篇之隨順・種姓之位相貫 |
〔CSCD §808〕 Padumapalāsato udakaṃ viya patilīyati patikuṭati pativattati | 行捨智之單元〔CSCD §766〕 | 彼篇以 padumapalāse īsakapoṇe udakaphusitāni patilīyanti patikuṭanti pativattanti na sampasāriyanti 出同一喻而其語四連,本篇則三連——同喻而語之數異,誌其實而不判 |
〔CSCD §812〕 pañca paccavekkhaṇāni | 第二三四道智・阿羅漢之單元〔CSCD §814〕 | 彼篇三處皆以 paccavekkhaṇaṃ vuttanayameva(省察如前說)承本篇之五省察——本篇立其式,彼篇三度援之 |
〔CSCD §811〕 sattacittaparamā ca ekāvajjanavīthi | 隨順智・至出起觀之單元〔CSCD §804〕 | 彼篇列意門轉向與三速行之心路,本篇以「一轉向之心路極於七心」為破諸師之據——二篇之心路之說相承 |
〔CSCD §810〕 sabbaapāyadvārāni pidahati | 所斷法之斷之單元〔CSCD §830〕 | 彼篇立初智所斷之五結中有 apāyagamanīyā ca kāmarāgapaṭighā(能趣惡趣之欲貪瞋恚)——本篇之功德與彼篇之所斷逐一相對 |
七、傳本
作者、傳本與注疏源流諸問題,本編不於考據內立說。
I. Placement in the Outline
Base text The base text for this unit is the CSCD internal working base, which is not published. Every Pāli form in this layer is copied verbatim from this unit’s source column. There is one form of location: 〔CSCD §NN〕, directly verifiable against the source column. This chapter has no in-house Pāli collated to pages, and page ranges are therefore not recorded.
Division titles The source column contains 3 ### lines: the chapter-title line ### 22. Ñāṇadassanavisuddhiniddeso (under the rule assigning the chapter title to the first unit, it does not enter the reader-facing title), ### Paṭhamamaggañāṇakathā, and ### Sotāpannapuggalakathā. Thus this unit contains two divisions, while its reader-facing title takes the title of the first.
Paragraph-number range The source-column paragraph numbers run from 〔CSCD §806〕 through 〔CSCD §812〕, with 7 numbers actually present and none missing or repeated. The source-column span is 9,978 bytes—the second-longest of this chapter’s seven units, after the 16,210-byte unit on the abandonment of what is to be abandoned.
The unit’s fivefold spine ① 〔CSCD §806〕 establishes the chapter’s scope: knowledge in the four paths is purification by knowledge and vision, while change-of-lineage knowledge belongs to neither the preceding nor the following purification, antarā abbohārikameva hoti (between them, not classed as either); it then describes the arising of change-of-lineage knowledge and its six conditions. ② 〔CSCD §807〕 uses the ditch-crossing simile to show the difference in object between the three conformity consciousnesses and change-of-lineage consciousness within one cognitive process. ③ 〔CSCD §808〕 distinguishes the functions of conformity and change-of-lineage—conformity can dispel the darkness concealing the truths but cannot take nibbāna as object, while change-of-lineage can take nibbāna as object but cannot dispel the darkness—and illustrates this with the moon-and-clouds simile. ④ 〔CSCD §809〕 uses the archer simile to show “the succession from change-of-lineage to the path,” and 〔CSCD §810〕 lists the path’s nine benefits. ⑤ 〔CSCD §811〕 through 〔CSCD §812〕 form the second division: the number of fruition consciousnesses (two or three) and the refutation of other teachers’ accounts, the stream-enterer’s position and seven returns, and finally the five reviews and nineteen reviews.
The author’s expressly marked refutation At 〔CSCD §811〕, Keci pana ekaṃ dve tīṇi cattāri vā phalacittānīti vadanti, taṃ na gahetabbaṃ. (some say that there are one, two, three, or four fruition consciousnesses; that should not be accepted)—the unit’s sentence of refutation. Its ground is sattacittaparamā ca ekāvajjanavīthi (a cognitive process with one adverting has a maximum of seven consciousnesses). At the end of 〔CSCD §811〕 the author again refutes a second account (Keci pana yassa cattāri anulomāni, tassa pañcamaṃ gotrabhu) and closes with Tasmā na sārato paccetabbaṃ (therefore it should not be regarded as sound).
The close and the boundary between the two divisions The first division closes with the indented sentence Paṭhamamaggañāṇaṃ niṭṭhitaṃ. (here ends first-path knowledge), immediately followed by the title line of the second division. The second division has no closing sentence and ends with Mahānāma’s question—among this chapter’s seven units, the presence or absence of a closing sentence varies (see Heading VI).
Forward and backward joins The preceding unit treats conformity knowledge and insight leading to emergence. The opening words here, Ito paraṃ gotrabhuñāṇaṃ hoti (from this point onward comes change-of-lineage knowledge), take “from this point onward” directly from the boundary established at the preceding unit’s close. The following unit treats knowledge in the second, third, and fourth paths and the arahant. The reviews established at this unit’s end are taken up by the following unit’s Evaṃ paccavekkhitvā pana so sotāpanno ariyasāvako—“having reviewed thus” is the join between the two units, and the same form occurs twice more within the following unit, in connection with the third and fourth paths.
Movement The chapter overview associates this unit with §E, “Purification by Knowledge and Vision (Chapter 22)—the Four Paths and Four Fruits, Cutting the Fetters.” The chapter-section locus associated with it appears verbatim in that table; this heading neither repeats nor extracts it. The paragraph-number and chapter-section systems have no established conversion, and none is inferred. All seven units in this chapter belong to this one movement.
II. Terms and Renderings
This heading records only usage and location in the present unit. The normative glossary governs settled terms; this heading does not determine terms the glossary leaves unsettled. Readings established in preceding chapters or units are not explained again. Terms occurring here include vipassanā (insight), anuloma (conformity), saṅkhāra (formation), nibbāna (nibbāna), bhavaṅga (life-continuum), javana (impulsion), and magga (path). Only terms new to this unit are listed below.
Purification by knowledge and vision and change-of-lineage knowledge 〔CSCD §806〕–〔CSCD §808〕
| Pāli | Rendering | Usage in this unit | Locus |
|---|---|---|---|
| ñāṇadassanavisuddhi | purification by knowledge and vision | The chapter’s name: imesu pana catūsu maggesu ñāṇaṃ ñāṇadassanavisuddhi nāma | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| gotrabhuñāṇa | change-of-lineage knowledge | The unit’s pivot: it belongs to neither purification, expressly because maggassa āvajjanaṭṭhāniyattā (it occupies the position of adverting to the path) | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| abbohārika | not classed as either | The determination of change-of-lineage knowledge’s position: it stands between the two purifications without being counted under either | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| vipassanāsota | stream of insight | Why change-of-lineage knowledge is still called insight: Vipassanāsote patitattā | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| saccapaṭicchādaka tama | darkness concealing the truths | What the three conformity consciousnesses remove; its forms occur 5 times by direct count | 〔CSCD §806〕・〔CSCD §808〕 |
| puthujjanagotta・puthujjanasaṅkhā・puthujjanabhūmi | ordinary person’s lineage・designation・plane | The three surmounted by change-of-lineage; their counterparts are ariyagottaṃ ariyasaṅkhaṃ ariyabhūmiṃ | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| paṭhamāvaṭṭana・paṭhamābhoga・paṭhamasamannāhāra | first turning・first inclination・first directing of attention | The three “firsts” of change-of-lineage knowledge with nibbāna as object | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| anantara・samanantara・āsevana・upanissaya・natthi・vigata | proximity・contiguity・repetition・decisive support・absence・disappearance | The six modes in which change-of-lineage knowledge conditions the path: chahi ākārehi paccayabhāvaṃ sādhayamānaṃ | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| muddhabhūta | become the summit | Change-of-lineage knowledge as insight’s summit, stated together with sikhāppattaṃ | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| apunarāvaṭṭaka | not turning back | A characteristic of change-of-lineage knowledge | 〔CSCD §806〕 |
| ekāvajjana ekavīthi | one adverting・one cognitive process | The determination that conformity and change-of-lineage occur in the same cognitive process but upon different objects | 〔CSCD §807〕 |
| visaṅkhāra | the unformed | One name for nibbāna, stated with animittaṃ appavattaṃ and nirodhaṃ | 〔CSCD §806〕・〔CSCD §807〕 |
The path’s benefits and fruition consciousnesses 〔CSCD §810〕–〔CSCD §811〕
| Pāli | Rendering | Usage in this unit | Locus |
|---|---|---|---|
| lobhakkhandha・dosakkhandha・mohakkhandha | aggregate of greed・aggregate of hate・aggregate of delusion | What the path pierces and splits apart; 2 occurrences by direct count (one appears as lobhadosamohakkhandhānaṃ) | 〔CSCD §808〕・〔CSCD §809〕 |
| anibbiddhapubba・apadālitapubba | never before pierced・never before split apart | The paired expressions describing the three aggregates | 〔CSCD §808〕・〔CSCD §809〕 |
| anamataggasaṃsāravaṭṭadukkhasamudda | ocean of suffering in the beginningless round | What the path dries up—the second of the nine benefits | 〔CSCD §810〕 |
| satta ariyadhanāni | seven noble treasures | What the path brings into one’s presence—the fourth of the nine benefits | 〔CSCD §810〕 |
| aṭṭhaṅgika micchāmagga | eightfold wrong path | What the path abandons—the fifth of the nine benefits | 〔CSCD §810〕 |
| orasaputtabhāva | status of a true-born child at the breast | What the path brings one to: being a true-born child at the breast of the Rightly and Fully Enlightened One—the seventh of the nine benefits | 〔CSCD §810〕 |
| anantaravipāka | immediate result | A characteristic of supramundane wholesomeness: its result arises immediately | 〔CSCD §811〕 |
| āsevanapaccaya | repetition condition | The ground for refuting “one conformity”: a single consciousness does not obtain repetition condition | 〔CSCD §811〕 |
The stream-enterer and reviewing 〔CSCD §812〕
| Pāli | Rendering | Usage in this unit | Locus |
|---|---|---|---|
| sotāpanna | stream-enterer | The second noble person, expressly described as sattakkhattuṃ devesu ca manussesu ca sandhāvitvā saṃsaritvā dukkhassantassa karaṇasamattho | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
| maggapaccavekkhaṇa | reviewing the path | The first of five reviews | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
| pahīnakilesa・avasiṭṭhakilesa | abandoned defilements・remaining defilements | The third and fourth of five reviews | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
| pañca paccavekkhaṇāni | five reviews | Five each for stream-enterers, once-returners, and non-returners | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
| ekūnavīsati paccavekkhaṇāni | nineteen reviews | The numerical determination in this unit: five for each of three noble persons gives fifteen, while the arahant has only four because there is no “review of remaining defilements,” giving nineteen | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
| ukkaṭṭhapariccheda | highest limit | The author expressly calls nineteen the “highest limit”: a trainee may or may not have the two reviews of abandoned and remaining defilements | 〔CSCD §812〕 |
The limit expressly marked by the author and its evidence At 〔CSCD §812〕, Ukkaṭṭhaparicchedoyeva ceso. Pahīnāvasiṭṭhakilesapaccavekkhaṇañhi sekkhānampi hoti vā na vā.—nineteen is not a fixed count but the highest limit. The evidence is Mahānāma’s question to the Blessed One about “what state remains unabandoned within me, such that states of greed sometimes obsess my mind” (kosu nāma me dhammo ajjhattaṃ appahīno). The treatise explains Mahānāma’s question by “the absence of this review.” This heading records the location verbatim and does not explain its meaning on the treatise’s behalf.
One place where this edition’s rendering differs from its existing critical reading (the reason is recorded) This edition’s existing critical reading under §E calls the knowledge arising after path and fruition “retrospective knowledge (paccavekkhaṇa),” while the normative glossary renders paccavekkhaṇa-ñāṇa as “reviewing knowledge.” This heading and the lists in this unit (five reviews, nineteen reviews, reviewing the path, and so forth) follow the normative glossary and use “reviewing.” Two renderings of one term are present; this column records the literal fact and does not decide it independently—left open for the wise who come after.
III. Variant Readings
Material basis This unit has no in-house Pāli collated to pages, so there is no collation passage to record. The only available surface is the base-text column itself. This apparatus records without adjudicating.
Comprehensive scan [measured in this column] A literal scan of the entire source column found zero matches for parenthetical variant sigla such as (sī.), (syā.), (kaṃ.), and (pī.); zero matches for the variant-recitation marker pāṭho; and zero matches for the marker of variant opinion porāṇā. Square brackets occur in only two forms: seven paragraph numbers and ten edition-page notes, all the latter within comments. There are 4 parenthetical notes, each a source marker, and no parenthetical notes other than source markers. The quotation marks '' occur 24 times, an even number, and form pairs throughout.
Positive record of the chapter’s paragraph-number range [for the whole chapter; not repeated in the other six units] The paragraph numbers in this chapter’s source columns run from 〔CSCD §806〕 through 〔CSCD §853〕, with 47 numbers actually present in a range that would contain 48—〔CSCD §839〕 is absent. Details appear under Heading III of the unit on the functions of full understanding and the rest. This edition directly checked the marked source file: the paragraph is present there but its number has no text; under the clean-file rule that omits empty numbered paragraphs, the consecutive number is omitted, but the source is not missing. Apart from this one number, the chapter’s numbering has no omissions, repetitions, or descending steps. This determination concerns the literal surface, not doctrine.
Boundary of this column All the measurements above concern the literal source-column surface; no collation against PTS scan pages was made. A zero count here applies only to this source column and implies nothing about other witnesses.
IV. The Commentator’s Citations
Each authorial citation is tied to a paragraph-number anchor. A source is recorded only where the text itself marks one, and its title is not independently determined. Parenthetical annotations in the “source marked by the text” column are copied verbatim rather than translated.
| Location | Citation formula [verbatim] | Import of the citation | Source marked by the text |
|---|---|---|---|
| 〔CSCD §806〕 | Yaṃ sandhāya vuttaṃ –/''Kathaṃ + edition-page note + bahiddhā vuṭṭhānavivaṭṭane paññā gotrabhuñāṇaṃ? | Defining question and answer for change-of-lineage knowledge: surmounting arising and entering non-arising | (paṭi. ma. 1.59) |
| 〔CSCD §811〕 | ''samādhimānantarikaññamāhū''ti | “They call the concentration immediate”—evidence that the result of supramundane wholesomeness is immediate | (khu. pā. 6.5) |
| 〔CSCD §811〕 | ''dandhaṃ ānantarikaṃ pāpuṇāti āsavānaṃ khayāyā''ti | “One slowly attains the immediate [condition] leading to the destruction of the influxes”—the second piece of evidence for the same point | (a. ni. 4.162) |
| 〔CSCD §812〕 | ''kosu nāma me dhammo ajjhattaṃ appahīno, yena me ekadā lobhadhammāpi cittaṃ pariyādāya tiṭṭhantī''ti | Mahānāma’s question—evidence that a trainee’s review of remaining defilements may or may not occur | (ma. ni. 1.175) |
Use of citations [measured in this column] The unit contains 4 citations: one defines the knowledge and establishes change-of-lineage; three provide grounds (two for immediacy and one for reviewing’s nonfixed occurrence). Three of the four close with a form of ādi vuttaṃ, vitthārato veditabbaṃ, or sabbaṃ vitthāretabbaṃ—the treatise itself marks the citations as incomplete and directs the reader to expand them, each occurrence being individually verifiable. Yathāha, Vuttaṃ hetaṃ, Vuttampi cetaṃ, and porāṇā have zero matches; Tena vuttaṃ occurs once, where 〔CSCD §811〕 returns to the number of fruition consciousnesses; kira occurs twice, both opening similes (eko kira cakkhumā puriso and eko kira issāso). These counts apply only to this unit, not to the whole work.
V. Similes and Rhetoric
This heading records only the locations of the unit’s similes and their correspondences; it offers no literary evaluation.
A. Similes Direct measurement found 14 token-bounded occurrences of viya, 3 forms of upamā, 1 occurrence of Yathā hi, and zero forms of sadisa. The unit has three similes and fourteen correspondences—all three are narrative similes, each corresponding to a single doctrinal point.
| Location | Simile | Doctrinal correspondence |
|---|---|---|
| 〔CSCD §807〕 | yathā hi mahāmātikaṃ laṅghitvā paratīre patiṭṭhātukāmo puriso vegena dhāvitvā mātikāya orimatīre rukkhasākhāya bandhitvā olambitaṃ rajjuṃ vā yaṭṭhiṃ vā gahetvā ullaṅghitvā | Ditch-crossing simile: one wishing to reach the far bank grasps a rope or pole attached to a branch on the near bank, leaps, and releases it only above the far bank—the three conformity consciousnesses still grasp formations as object, while change-of-lineage consciousness releases them and enters nibbāna |
| 〔CSCD §808〕 | eko kira cakkhumā puriso ''nakkhattayogaṃ jānissāmī''ti rattibhāge nikkhamitvā candaṃ passituṃ uddhaṃ ullokesi | Moon-and-clouds simile: three winds successively disperse three clouds, gross, medium, and fine, after which the moon is seen—the three conformity consciousnesses remove the threefold darkness concealing the truths, after which change-of-lineage knowledge sees nibbāna |
| 〔CSCD §809〕 | eko kira issāso aṭṭhausabhamatte padese phalakasataṃ ṭhapāpetvā vatthena mukhaṃ veṭhetvā saraṃ sannahitvā cakkayante aṭṭhāsi | Archer simile: a blindfolded archer follows another person’s stick signal and shoots through one hundred boards—path knowledge, without relinquishing the signal given by change-of-lineage knowledge, pierces the three aggregates |
Number of correspondences in the three similes [measured in this column] The ditch-crossing simile has 5 correspondences (rope or pole = formations as object; first conformity = leaping; second = body inclining toward the far bank; third = reaching above the far bank; change-of-lineage = landing on the far bank). The moon-and-clouds simile has 6 correspondences (three clouds = threefold darkness; three winds = three conformity consciousnesses; person with sight = change-of-lineage knowledge; moon = nibbāna; scattering clouds = dispelling darkness; seeing the moon = seeing nibbāna). The archer simile has 2 correspondences (stick signal = change-of-lineage knowledge; archer = path knowledge), followed by one long sentence summarizing their correspondence. The numbers of correspondences differ, but every correspondence uses the same viya pattern, matching each item in turn.
B. Verifiable rhetorical observations ① A sequence of negations forms the spine of 〔CSCD §806〕: na pakkhandati, na santiṭṭhati, nādhimuccati, na sajjati, na laggati, na bajjhati, six negations in succession, immediately closed by the lotus-leaf water simile (Padumapalāsato udakaṃ viya patilīyati patikuṭati pativattati)—the same family as the fourfold sequence in the unit on equanimity about formations, but with the fourth expression absent here. ② ? occurs once in the unit, in the quoted question. ③ The closing formula Tena vuttaṃ occurs once, and vuccati once. ④ There are 19 indented lines, most belonging to the quoted passage and the two closing sentences. ⑤ The nine benefits in 〔CSCD §810〕 close successively with the six verbs karoti, pidahati, pajahati, vūpasameti, upaneti, and saṃvattatīti; the nine clauses are parallel, and no one item repeats its verb. ⑥ paccavekkhati occurs 10 times (forms of the word for reviewing total 18), all within the establishment and itemization of the five reviews.
These measurements apply only to this unit, not to the whole work.
VI. Intratextual Cross-Reading
Every reference carries a paragraph-number anchor. Each is established only from terminology verifiable in the present text. Because no conversion between this unit’s paragraph numbers and chapter-section system is established, the references are not tied to chapter sections, and no conversion is inferred. This heading does not independently adjudicate.
| This unit | Referent | Verifiable relation |
|---|---|---|
〔CSCD §806〕 Ito paraṃ gotrabhuñāṇaṃ hoti | Unit on conformity knowledge and insight leading to emergence, 〔CSCD §805〕 | That unit establishes the boundary with Sabbena sabbaṃ pana gotrabhuñāṇaṃ vuṭṭhānagāminiyā vipassanāya pariyosānaṃ; this unit immediately takes up that position |
〔CSCD §806〕 ''Kathaṃ + edition-page note + bahiddhā vuṭṭhānavivaṭṭane paññā gotrabhuñāṇaṃ? | Unit on the correspondence between emergence and the powers, 〔CSCD §827〕 | That unit cites the same canonical sentence (bahiddhāvuṭṭhānavivaṭṭane paññā gotrabhuñāṇa) to establish that “change-of-lineage turns only toward emergence”—the two units cite the same words but use them differently |
〔CSCD §806〕 puthujjanagottaṃ puthujjanasaṅkhaṃ puthujjanabhūmiṃ atikkamamānaṃ | Unit on the divisions of full understanding and the rest and the chapter close, 〔CSCD §849〕 | That unit lists thirteen abandonments by the opposite factor and closes with Anulomena saccapaṭilomagāhassa; its sequence connects with the position of conformity and change-of-lineage in this unit |
〔CSCD §808〕 Padumapalāsato udakaṃ viya patilīyati patikuṭati pativattati | Unit on knowledge of equanimity about formations, 〔CSCD §766〕 | That unit gives the same simile in the fourfold expression padumapalāse īsakapoṇe udakaphusitāni patilīyanti patikuṭanti pativattanti na sampasāriyanti, whereas this unit has three expressions—the simile is the same but the number of expressions differs; the fact is recorded without judgment |
〔CSCD §812〕 pañca paccavekkhaṇāni | Unit on knowledge in the second, third, and fourth paths and the arahant, 〔CSCD §814〕 | That unit says paccavekkhaṇaṃ vuttanayameva (reviewing is as already stated) in all three places, taking up this unit’s five reviews—this unit establishes the pattern and the next invokes it three times |
〔CSCD §811〕 sattacittaparamā ca ekāvajjanavīthi | Unit on conformity knowledge and insight leading to emergence, 〔CSCD §804〕 | That unit lists the cognitive process of mind-door adverting and three impulsions; this unit uses “a cognitive process with one adverting has a maximum of seven consciousnesses” as the ground for refuting other teachers—the accounts of the cognitive process in the two units are continuous |
〔CSCD §810〕 sabbaapāyadvārāni pidahati | Unit on the abandonment of what is to be abandoned, 〔CSCD §830〕 | That unit’s five fetters abandoned by first knowledge include apāyagamanīyā ca kāmarāgapaṭighā (sensual desire and aversion that lead to bad destinations)—the benefit in this unit corresponds item by item to what is abandoned there |
VII. Transmission
This edition makes no claim in the apparatus concerning the author, textual transmission, or the lineage of commentaries.