清淨道論 觀之隨染・道非道之確定Visuddhimagga · The Corruptions of Insight and Determining What Is and Is Not the Path

〔CSCD §732–736〕
心要Essence

全書最該記的一頁。修觀到生滅智初熟,會湧出十種東西:光明、智、喜、輕安、樂、勝解、策勵、現起、捨,乃至一絲微細的欣求。它們只生在修得對、修得勤的人身上——遇到它,表示你走對了路;也正因走對了,才有這個陷阱。它們大多是真的好:金剛一般的智、五喜遍身、非人之樂、如山王的念。問題在你會把它們當成「我證道了」,捨了根本業處,只是味著光明而坐——論主叫這「越出了觀之路」:不是掉進坑,是走岔了。真正的染是第十項欣求:對前九的微細貪喜,偽裝成寂靜,甚至不能把它把握為煩惱。前九本身不壞,黏上去才壞——每一樣都有三種抓法:「我的」是見,「真可意」是慢,「味著」是渴愛;十乘三,三十執。

有位老長老,六十年以為自己是阿羅漢,能答一千個問題、能化白象;學生請他讓象作可怖之鳴衝過來,他起身要逃。學生抓住衣角:漏盡者難道還會有怯懦?他當下蹲坐學生足下:請作我的依怙。三步得果。被指出時的乾脆,才是功夫。

解法沒有新招:把光明當成任何一個行來看——無常、有為、緣生、盡法、衰法、離貪法、滅法;不是我的、不是我、不是我的我。看穿、不黏、繼續走原路。認出「這十樣不是道,離了隨染繼續看生滅的觀智才是道」,就是道非道智見清淨。到此三諦已定:見清淨定苦諦,度疑清淨定集諦,這裡定道諦。第四品的禪樂、第九品慈的近敵,都是同一堂課;這裡是最高一層——連你自己修出來的好境界,都要看穿、不黏、放手。

This is the page most worth remembering in the whole book. When insight in arising and passing away first matures, ten things may surge up: illumination, knowledge, rapture, tranquillity, happiness, resolution, exertion, manifestation, equanimity, and even a trace of subtle delight. They arise only in someone who practices rightly and diligently—encountering them means you are on the right road, but precisely because you are on the right road, this trap exists. Most are genuinely good: knowledge like a thunderbolt, five raptures filling the body, superhuman delight, mindfulness like the king of mountains. The problem is taking them to mean “I have attained the path,” abandoning the root meditation subject, and sitting there savoring illumination. The Commentator calls this “leaving the course of insight”: not falling into a pit but taking a side road. The real corruption is the tenth, delight in the first nine—subtle pleasure disguised as peace, which cannot even be apprehended as a defilement. The first nine are not themselves bad; attachment makes them bad. Each has three ways of grasping: “mine” is view, “how agreeable” is conceit, and “savoring” is craving. Ten times three makes thirty graspings.

An old elder believed for sixty years that he was an arahant. He could answer a thousand questions and conjure a white elephant. His student asked him to make the elephant charge with a terrifying cry, and he rose to flee. The student caught the corner of his robe: is there timidity in one whose influxes are destroyed? The elder immediately squatted at his student’s feet and said, “Please be my refuge.” Three steps later he attained the fruit. How cleanly you respond when shown—that is the practice.

The remedy has no new trick: regard illumination as any other formation—impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated, subject to exhaustion, decay, dispassion, and cessation; not mine, not I, not my self. See through it, do not cling, and continue on the original road. Recognizing that “these ten are not the path; insight knowledge free from corruptions that continues seeing arising and passing away is the path” is purification by knowledge and vision of what is and is not the path. Three truths are now determined: purification of view determines the truth of suffering, purification by overcoming doubt the truth of origin, and this purification the truth of the path. The jhāna happiness of Chapter 4 and the near enemy of loving-kindness in Chapter 9 teach the same lesson; here it reaches its highest level—even a good state produced by your own practice must be seen through, not clung to, and released.

白話Plain reading

本單元白話為本編自巴利原典之譯疏(tr. mine);底本事項詳本單元考據。


§1 十觀隨染之名與其所起之人 〔CSCD §732〕

觀之隨染之說

那時,於這以少年觀而已發起觀的人,十種觀之隨染¹就生起了。因為觀之隨染不生起於已得通達的聖弟子,也不生起於行邪道而捨了業處的懈怠之人;而於正行道、勤修不懈、已發起觀的善男子,它們是一定會生起的。

那麼,那十種隨染是哪些呢?光明、智、喜、輕安、樂、勝解、策勵、現起、捨、欣求²。因為說過:

「怎樣是心為法之掉舉所執持呢?以無常作意時,光明生起;『光明是法』而轉向於光明,由此而有散亂——這就是掉舉。心為那掉舉所執持的人,就不如實了知以無常之現起。以苦……以無我〔作意時〕……就不如實了知〔其〕現起。」

同樣:「以無常作意時,智生起……乃至(廣說如前)……喜……輕安……樂……勝解……策勵……現起……捨……欣求生起;『欣求是法』而轉向於欣求,由此而有散亂——這就是掉舉。心為那掉舉所執持的人,就不如實了知以無常之現起。以苦……以無我〔作意時〕……就不如實了知〔其〕現起。」


§2 光明之染——自結跏之處至一萬世界之量 〔CSCD §733〕

其中,「光明」,就是觀之光明。它生起時,瑜伽者就執非道為「道」、執非果為「果」:「我從前確實不曾生起過這樣的光明,我必定是已得道、已得果了。」在他這樣執非道為「道」、非果為「果」之時,就叫作越出了觀之路。他捨了自己的根本業處,只是味著光明而坐。

而這光明,於某些比丘唯照耀結跏之處而生起;於某些人〔照耀〕室內;於某些人也〔照耀〕室外;於某些人〔照耀〕全寺、一俱盧舍、半由旬、一由旬、二由旬、三由旬……乃至(廣說如前)……於某些人,自地面直到色究竟天,作成一片光明。而於世尊,則是照耀一萬世界而生起的。

而關於它的這種差別,有這樣一則事:據說在質多羅山(Cittalapabbata),有兩位長老坐在一座雙壁之屋(dvikuṭṭageha)之內。那一天是黑分布薩日,四方為雲層所覆,夜分之中轉起具四支的黑闇。這時一位長老說:「尊者,我現在看見塔院之中師子座上五色的花。」另一位對他說:「賢友,你所說的並不希奇;我現在看見大海之中一由旬之處的魚與龜。」


§3 三事之敘——二長老、三長老、法施長老試大龍長老 〔CSCD §733〕

而這觀之隨染,多分生起於得止觀者。他由於為等至所鎮伏的諸煩惱不現行,就生起「我是阿羅漢」之心——如住鬱遮婆利迦(Uccavālika)的大龍長老,如住漢迦那迦(Haṃkanaka)的大達多長老,又如住質多羅山之寧迦鵬那迦(Niṅkapeṇṇaka)精勤堂的小善意長老。

這裡有這樣一則事的說明:據說有一位住多藍伽羅(Talaṅgara)的法施長老,是得無礙解的大漏盡者³,為大比丘眾的教誡者。

他有一天坐在自己的晝住之處,轉向思惟:「我們的阿闍梨、住鬱遮婆利迦的大龍長老,他的沙門之事是否已到頂了呢?」見到他還只是凡夫之位,又知道「我若不去,他就要以凡夫而命終了」,於是以神通飛上空中,下降到坐在晝住之處的長老身邊,禮拜、示敬之後,坐於一邊。

〔長老〕說:「賢友法施啊,你怎麼非時而來呢?」他就說:「尊者,我是為了問問題而來的。」於是〔長老〕說:「賢友,你問吧;凡我所知的,我會說。」他就問了一千個問題。

長老對所問的一一都毫無滯礙地說了。於是〔法施〕說:「尊者,您的智極為銳利;您是什麼時候證得這個法的呢?」〔長老〕說:「賢友,是六十年前。」「尊者,也請運用定吧。」「賢友,這並不難。」「那麼尊者,請化作一頭象。」

長老化作了一頭純白的象。「尊者,現在請讓這象豎起耳朵、伸直尾巴、把鼻子放進口中,作可怖的象鳴,向著您衝來。」

長老照著作了,卻在見到那疾馳而來的象的可怖之相時,起身要逃。那漏盡的長老就伸手抓住他的衣角,說:「尊者,漏盡者難道還會有怯懦嗎?」

他在那時知道了自己還是凡夫之位,就說:「賢友法施啊,請作我的依怙。」而在他足下蹲坐。〔法施說:〕「尊者,我正是為了作您的依怙而來的,請不要憂慮。」就為他說了業處。長老取了業處,登上經行處,在第三步就得到了最上果——阿羅漢果。據說那位長老是瞋行者。像這樣的比丘們,也會在光明之中動搖。


§4 九染之逐一釋——智、喜、輕安、樂、勝解、策勵、現起、捨、欣求 〔CSCD §734〕

「智」,就是觀之智。據說在他衡量、度察色法與非色法之時,就生起如同所放出的帝釋之金剛一般勢不可遏的、銳利的、勇猛的、極明淨的智。

「喜」,就是觀之喜。據說他在那時,小喜、剎那喜、繼起喜、踊躍喜、遍滿喜⁴這五種喜就遍滿全身而生起。

「輕安」,就是觀之輕安。據說他在那時,無論坐在夜住之處或晝住之處,身與心都沒有惱、沒有重、沒有粗、沒有不堪任、沒有病、沒有曲;反而他的身與心是輕安的、輕的、柔的、堪任的、極明淨的、正直的。他為這輕安等所攝持而身心〔調適〕,在那時就領受所謂非人之樂。就是就這個而說了:

  入於空閑之屋,心已寂靜的比丘,
  正觀於法者,有非人之樂。
  隨其所思惟,諸蘊之生滅,
  得喜與悅——那是知者的不死。

這樣,成就他這非人之樂的、與輕快性等相應的輕安就生起了。

「樂」,就是觀之樂。據說他在那時,就生起遍潤全身的極勝妙之樂。

「勝解」,就是信。因為他就生起與觀相應的、成為心與心所之極淨的強信。

「策勵」,就是精進。因為他就生起與觀相應的、不緩、不過勤、善策勵的精進。

「現起」,就是念⁵。因為他就生起與觀相應的、善住的、善立的、深入的、不動的、如山王一般的念。他所轉向、所攝持、所作意、所省察的那一一之處,就深入、躍入而為他的念所現起,如同他世之為天眼〔所現起〕一般。

「捨」,就是觀捨與轉向捨⁶。因為他在那時,於一切諸行成為中庸的觀捨也強力地生起;於意門,轉向捨也〔生起〕。因為在他轉向於那一一之處時,它就如同所放出的帝釋之金剛、如同投入葉器的熾熱的鐵箭一般,勇猛而銳利地轉起。

「欣求」,就是觀之欣求。因為對他這樣以光明等所莊嚴的觀,就生起作愛著而微細寂靜之相的欣求;那欣求,甚至不能把它把握為煩惱。

而如同於光明,於這些之中的任何一種生起時,瑜伽者也就執非道為「道」、執非果為「果」:「我從前確實不曾生起過這樣的智,也不曾生起過這樣的喜、輕安、樂、勝解、策勵、現起、捨、欣求;我必定是已得道、已得果了。」在他這樣執非道為「道」、非果為「果」之時,就叫作越出了觀之路。他捨了自己的根本業處,只是味著欣求而坐。


§5 十染之三十執——見執、慢執、渴愛執 〔CSCD §735〕

而在這裡,光明等是以其為隨染之事⁷而說為隨染的,並不是因為它們是不善。而欣求則既是隨染,也是隨染之事。它們依事而言唯有這十種,依執則成為三十。怎麼說呢?執「我的光明生起了」,就有見執;執「光明生起了,真是可意」,就是慢執;味著光明,就是渴愛執——這樣,於光明就依見、慢、渴愛而有三執。其餘的也是同樣。這樣,依執而言,隨染就有三十種。

由於它們,不善巧不聰慧的瑜伽者就在光明等之中動搖、散亂。他把光明等的一一隨觀為「這是我的,這是我,這是我的我」。所以古師們說:

  於光明、於智,於喜而動搖,
  於輕安、於樂——為此諸法而心震動。
  於勝解、於策勵,於現起而動搖,
  於捨之轉向,於捨、於欣求〔亦然〕。


§6 道非道之確定——三諦之確定與品末 〔CSCD §736〕

道非道之確定之說

而善巧、賢明、聰慧、具覺的瑜伽者,在光明等生起時,就以慧這樣限定、觀察它:「我的這光明生起了;而這光明是無常的、有為的、緣生的、盡法、衰法、離貪法、滅法。」

或者他這樣想:「假使光明是我,執它為『我』倒也可以;然而它是無我而被執為『我』。所以它以不自在之義而無我,以已有而無之義而無常,以為生滅所逼之義而苦。」——這一切都應當依無色七法之中所說的理趣而廣說。如同於光明,於其餘的也是同樣。

他這樣觀察之後,就把光明隨觀為「這不是我的,這不是我,這不是我的我」。把智……乃至(廣說如前)……把欣求隨觀為「這不是我的,這不是我,這不是我的我」。這樣隨觀的人,就不在光明等之中動搖、震動。所以古師們說:

  這十種處,為他的慧所遍知,
  他就善巧於法之掉舉,而不趣於散亂。

他這樣不趣於散亂,解開了那三十種的隨染之結,而確定道與非道:「光明等諸法不是道;而離了隨染、已入於路的觀智才是道。」他這樣知道了「這是道,這不是道」而住立的智,就應當知道那就是道非道智見清淨。

而到此為止,他也就作了三諦的確定。怎麼說呢?先於見清淨,以名色的安立而作了苦諦的確定;於度疑清淨,以緣的把握而〔作了〕集諦的確定;於這道非道智見清淨,以正道的確定而作了道諦的確定。這樣,先以世間之智就作了三諦的確定⁸。

於為令善人歡喜而造的《清淨道論》中

慧之修習之章裡

名為道非道智見清淨之解釋的

第二十品〔已竟〕。


¹ 觀之隨染(vipassanupakkilesa):於觀之進途所起而令行者誤認為證果之十法;論自標其唯生於正行道而已發起觀之人。

² 欣求(nikanti):於所修之觀所起之微細欣樂;十隨染之末一,論自標其不可把握為煩惱。

³ 得無礙解者・大漏盡者(pabhinnapaṭisambhida・mahākhīṇāsava):前者謂四無礙解已通達,後者謂諸漏已盡;本篇以此二相狀法施長老。

⁴ 小喜等五喜(khuddakāpīti 等):喜之五種,其逐一之釋在〈地遍〉一品之初禪之單元。

⁵ 念(sati):憶持所緣而不忘失之心所,論中恆與智、精進、定並行。與今日通行之「正念」一語所指之泛然覺察不同科,宜依本論所立而讀。

⁶ 觀捨・轉向捨(vipassanupekkhā・āvajjanupekkhā):前者於一切諸行成中庸,後者於意門轉向之時而起。

⁷ 隨染之事(upakkilesavatthu):光明等九者本身非不善,唯以其為隨染所依之事而名為隨染。

⁸ 三諦之確定:苦、集、道三諦分由見清淨、度疑清淨、道非道智見清淨而確定;三清淨之開演在第十八品、第十九品與本品。

The vernacular of this unit is this edition’s own rendering-with-exposition from the Pāli original (tr. mine); see this unit’s apparatus for the base-text particulars.


§1 The Names of the Ten Corruptions of Insight and the Person in Whom They Arise 〔CSCD §732〕

The Exposition of the Corruptions of Insight

At that point, the ten corruptions of insight¹ arise in one who has initiated insight by means of this tender insight. For the corruptions of insight do not arise in a noble disciple who has reached penetration. Nor do they arise in the indolent person who follows a wrong path and has laid aside the meditation subject. But they certainly arise in a clansman who is practicing rightly, devoted to the work, and has initiated insight.

What, then, are these ten corruptions? Illumination, knowledge, rapture, tranquillity, happiness, resolution, exertion, manifestation, equanimity, and delight.² For it has been said:

“How does the mind become seized by agitation about phenomena? When one attends as impermanent, illumination arises. Adverting to illumination with the thought ‘illumination is a phenomenon,’ distraction arises from that; this is agitation. One whose mind is seized by that agitation does not understand the manifestation as impermanent as it actually is. When attending as suffering … as not-self … one does not understand the manifestation as it actually is.”

Likewise: “When one attends as impermanent, knowledge arises … and so on, as stated above … rapture … tranquillity … happiness … resolution … exertion … manifestation … equanimity … delight arises. Adverting to delight with the thought ‘delight is a phenomenon,’ distraction arises from that; this is agitation. One whose mind is seized by that agitation does not understand the manifestation as impermanent as it actually is. When attending as suffering … as not-self … one does not understand the manifestation as it actually is.”


§2 The Corruption of Illumination—In Extent from One’s Cross-Legged Seat to Ten Thousand Worlds 〔CSCD §733〕

Here “illumination” is the illumination of insight. When it arises, the meditator takes what is not the path to be “the path” and what is not the fruit to be “the fruit”: “Surely such illumination has never arisen in me before. I have certainly attained the path and attained the fruit.” When he thus takes what is not the path to be “the path” and what is not the fruit to be “the fruit,” he is said to have left the course of insight. He abandons his own root meditation subject and sits savoring only the illumination.

For some bhikkhus this illumination arises lighting only the place where they sit cross-legged; for some it lights the room; for some, outside the room as well; for some, the whole monastery, a quarter yojana, half a yojana, one yojana, two yojanas, three yojanas … and so on, as stated above … and for some, it makes one mass of light from the surface of the earth up to the Brahmā world of Akaniṭṭha. For the Blessed One, however, it arose illuminating the ten-thousandfold world-system.

Here is a story illustrating its variation. It is said that two elders were seated inside a double-walled house (dvikuṭṭageha) at Cittalapabbata. That day was the observance day of the dark fortnight; the directions were covered by banks of cloud, and during the night a four-factored darkness prevailed. Then one elder said, “Venerable sir, I can now see five-colored flowers on the lion throne in the shrine courtyard.” The other said to him, “Friend, what you say is not remarkable. I can now see the fish and turtles in the ocean at a distance of one yojana.”


§3 Three Accounts—Two Elders, Three Elders, and Elder Dhammadinna’s Test of Elder Mahānāga 〔CSCD §733〕

This corruption of insight arises mostly in one who has attained serenity and insight. Because the defilements suppressed by attainment do not occur, the thought “I am an arahant” arises in him—as it did in Elder Mahānāga, resident of Uccavālika; Elder Mahādatta, resident of Haṃkanaka; and Elder Cūḷasumana, resident of the Niṅkapeṇṇaka striving hall at Cittalapabbata.

Here a particular story illustrates this. It is said that an elder named Dhammadinna, resident of Talaṅgara, had attained the analytical knowledges, was a great one whose influxes were destroyed,³ and instructed a large community of bhikkhus.

One day, seated in his daytime dwelling place, he adverted: “Has the ascetic’s task of our teacher, Elder Mahānāga, resident of Uccavālika, reached its summit or not?” Seeing that the elder was still in the state of an ordinary person and knowing, “If I do not go, he will die an ordinary person,” he rose into the air by supernormal power, descended beside the elder seated in his daytime dwelling place, paid homage and showed the proper courtesies, and sat to one side.

The elder said, “Friend Dhammadinna, why have you come at an untimely hour?” He replied, “Venerable sir, I have come to ask a question.” The elder then said, “Ask, friend; whatever I know, I shall tell you.” He asked a thousand questions.

The elder answered every question without hesitation. Dhammadinna then said, “Venerable sir, your knowledge is exceedingly sharp. When did you attain this Dhamma?” The elder replied, “Sixty years ago, friend.” “Venerable sir, please also make use of concentration.” “That is not difficult, friend.” “Then, venerable sir, please create an elephant.”

The elder created an entirely white elephant. “Venerable sir, now make this elephant raise its ears, extend its tail, put its trunk into its mouth, sound a terrifying elephant cry, and charge toward you.”

The elder did so, but when he saw the terrifying aspect of the elephant charging swiftly toward him, he rose to flee. The elder whose influxes were destroyed stretched out his hand, caught the corner of his robe, and said, “Venerable sir, is there such a thing as timidity in one whose influxes are destroyed?”

At that moment he knew that he was still in the state of an ordinary person. He said, “Friend Dhammadinna, please be my refuge,” and squatted at his feet. Dhammadinna said, “Venerable sir, I came precisely to be your refuge. Do not worry,” and taught him a meditation subject. The elder took up the meditation subject, ascended the walking path, and on the third step attained the highest fruit, the fruit of arahantship. It is said that this elder was of a hating temperament. Bhikkhus of this kind too are shaken by illumination.


§4 The Nine Remaining Corruptions Explained One by One—Knowledge, Rapture, Tranquillity, Happiness, Resolution, Exertion, Manifestation, Equanimity, and Delight 〔CSCD §734〕

“Knowledge” is knowledge of insight. It is said that as he weighs and investigates material and immaterial phenomena, knowledge arises that is irresistible in force like Indra’s released thunderbolt, sharp, courageous, and exceedingly clear.

“Rapture” is the rapture of insight. It is said that at that time the five kinds of rapture—minor rapture, momentary rapture, showering rapture, uplifting rapture, and pervading rapture⁴—arise filling his whole body.

“Tranquillity” is the tranquillity of insight. It is said that at that time, whether seated in a nighttime or daytime dwelling place, his body and mind have no distress, heaviness, rigidity, unwieldiness, sickness, or crookedness. Instead, his body and mind are tranquil, light, malleable, wieldy, exceedingly clear, and upright. With body and mind supported by this tranquillity and the rest, at that time he experiences what is called superhuman delight. It was with reference to this that the following was said:

  For the bhikkhu who has entered an empty dwelling, his mind at peace,
  Who rightly sees phenomena, there is a delight that is more than human.
  Whenever he comprehends the aggregates’ arising and passing,
  He gains rapture and gladness—that is the deathless for one who knows.

Thus tranquillity associated with lightness and the rest arises in him, bringing about this superhuman delight.

“Happiness” is the happiness of insight. It is said that at that time exceedingly sublime happiness arises suffusing his entire body.

“Resolution” is faith. For strong faith arises in him, associated with insight and constituting an extraordinary clarity of mind and mental factors.

“Exertion” is energy. For energy arises in him associated with insight, neither slack nor over-strained, but well exerted.

“Manifestation” is mindfulness.⁵ For mindfulness arises in him associated with insight, well established, firmly established, deeply planted, immovable, and like the king of mountains. Whatever place he adverts to, gathers, attends to, or reviews, mindfulness enters and plunges into it, and it becomes manifest to him as the other world does to one with the divine eye.

“Equanimity” is insight equanimity and equanimity in adverting.⁶ For at that time insight equanimity, which is neutral toward all formations, arises strongly in him; equanimity in adverting at the mind door also arises. Whenever he adverts to any place, it proceeds courageously and sharply, like Indra’s released thunderbolt and like a red-hot iron arrow thrown into a receptacle of leaves.

“Delight” is delight in insight. For when his insight is thus adorned with illumination and the rest, delight arises making attachment and having a subtle and peaceful aspect. That delight cannot even be apprehended as a defilement.

Just as with illumination, when any one of these arises, the meditator takes what is not the path to be “the path” and what is not the fruit to be “the fruit”: “Surely such knowledge has never arisen in me before, nor such rapture, tranquillity, happiness, resolution, exertion, manifestation, equanimity, or delight. I have certainly attained the path and attained the fruit.” When he thus takes what is not the path to be “the path” and what is not the fruit to be “the fruit,” he is said to have left the course of insight. He abandons his own root meditation subject and sits savoring only delight.


§5 The Thirty Graspings of the Ten Corruptions—Grasping by View, Conceit, and Craving 〔CSCD §735〕

Here illumination and the rest are called corruptions because they are bases for corruption,⁷ not because they are unwholesome. Delight, however, is both a corruption and a basis for corruption. As bases they are only ten; as graspings they become thirty. How? When one grasps, “My illumination has arisen,” there is grasping by view. When one grasps, “How agreeable that illumination has arisen,” there is grasping by conceit. When one savors illumination, there is grasping by craving. Thus there are three graspings regarding illumination—by view, conceit, and craving. It is the same for the rest. In this way, as graspings, the corruptions become thirty.

Because of them, an unskillful, undiscerning meditator is shaken and distracted among illumination and the rest. He contemplates each of them as “this is mine, this I am, this is my self.” Therefore the Ancients said:

  He is shaken by illumination, knowledge, and rapture;
  By tranquillity and happiness, his mind trembles at these phenomena.
  He is shaken by resolution, exertion, and manifestation;
  By adverting to equanimity, equanimity itself, and delight.


§6 Determining What Is and Is Not the Path—Determining Three Truths and the Chapter’s Close 〔CSCD §736〕

The Exposition of Determining What Is and Is Not the Path

But when illumination and the rest arise, a skillful, wise, discerning meditator endowed with understanding delimits and examines them with wisdom in this way: “This illumination of mine has arisen; yet this illumination is impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated, subject to exhaustion, subject to decay, subject to dispassion, and subject to cessation.”

Or he thinks: “If illumination were self, it would be proper to apprehend it as ‘self’; yet it is not-self and is apprehended as ‘self.’ Therefore it is not-self in the sense of not being subject to mastery, impermanent in the sense of having been and then not being, and suffering in the sense of being oppressed by arising and passing away.” All this should be developed in detail according to the method stated under the sevenfold method for the immaterial. As with illumination, so with the rest.

Having examined it in this way, he contemplates illumination as “this is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self.” He contemplates knowledge … and so on, as stated above … through delight as “this is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self.” One who contemplates in this way is not shaken or made to tremble among illumination and the rest. Therefore the Ancients said:

  When these ten bases have been fully understood by his wisdom,
  He becomes skillful in agitation about phenomena and does not proceed to distraction.

Thus, without proceeding to distraction, he untangles that thirtyfold tangle of corruptions and determines the path and what is not the path: “Phenomena such as illumination are not the path; insight knowledge free from corruptions and entered upon the course is the path.” The knowledge that stands after he has thus known “this is the path; this is not the path” and determined both the path and what is not the path should be understood as purification by knowledge and vision of what is and is not the path.

By this point he has also determined three truths. How? First, in purification of view he determined the truth of suffering by delimiting name-and-form. In purification by overcoming doubt he determined the truth of origin by apprehending conditions. In this purification by knowledge and vision of what is and is not the path he determined the truth of the path by determining the right path. Thus, for the time being, he has determined three truths through mundane knowledge.⁸

In the Visuddhimagga, made for the gladness of good people,

In the Division on the Development of Wisdom,

The twentieth chapter, called

The Exposition of Purification by Knowledge and Vision of What Is and Is Not the Path, is concluded.


Notes

¹ Corruptions of insight (vipassanupakkilesa): ten phenomena that arise as insight advances and cause a practitioner to mistake them for attainment of the fruit; the treatise itself states that they arise only in one who practices rightly and has initiated insight.

² Delight (nikanti): the subtle enjoyment that arises toward the insight being developed; the last of the ten corruptions, which the treatise itself says cannot be apprehended as a defilement.

³ One who has attained the analytical knowledges and a great one whose influxes are destroyed (pabhinnapaṭisambhida; mahākhīṇāsava): the former means one who has penetrated the four analytical knowledges, and the latter one whose influxes are exhausted; this unit characterizes Elder Dhammadinna by both.

⁴ The five kinds of rapture beginning with minor rapture (khuddakāpīti, etc.): the five kinds of rapture, each of which is explained in the unit on the first jhāna in the chapter on the earth kasiṇa.

⁵ Mindfulness (sati): the mental factor that retains its object and does not forget it; throughout the treatise it proceeds together with knowledge, energy, and concentration. It is a distinct category from the diffuse awareness commonly intended by the modern expression “mindfulness” and should be read according to the analysis established in this treatise.

⁶ Insight equanimity and equanimity in adverting (vipassanupekkhā; āvajjanupekkhā): the former is neutral toward all formations; the latter arises at the time of adverting at the mind door.

⁷ Basis for corruption (upakkilesavatthu): the first nine, illumination and the rest, are not themselves unwholesome; they are called corruptions only because they are the bases upon which corruption depends.

⁸ Determining three truths: the truths of suffering, origin, and the path are determined respectively by purification of view, purification by overcoming doubt, and purification by knowledge and vision of what is and is not the path. These three purifications are expounded in Chapters 18, 19, and the present chapter.

義疏Exposition

全書最該記的一頁:修觀到少年觀智,會湧出光明、智、喜、輕安、樂、勝解、策勵、現起、捨與一絲微細的欣求——它們大多不是壞的;問題在你會把它們當成「我證道了」;認出「這十樣不是道」,就是道非道智見清淨

大局 — 贗品出現的時刻,與這一弧全書那把尺最精純的一次

上一單元末句給行者戴上「已發起觀者」的頭銜;本單元第一句就說:於此人,十種觀之隨染生起——且唯生於正行道、勤修不懈、已發起觀的善男子,不生於聖弟子、也不生於邪道者與懈怠者(§1)。十名:光明・智・喜・輕安・樂・勝解・策勵・現起・捨・欣求。論主先詳說「光明」——它生起時行者執非道為道、非果為果,捨根本業處而味著光明;光明之量自結跏處至一萬世界,附二長老於黑闇夜見花見魚之事(§2);並錄三位以為自己是阿羅漢的長老,及法施長老以化象試大龍長老、六十年老修行者見象而起身欲逃、方知凡夫、三步而得阿羅漢的故事(§3)。再逐一釋其餘九染(§4),末一「欣求」以愛著而微細寂靜之相生起、甚至不能把握為煩惱。§5 說十染依執成三十(見執・慢執・愛執),不聰慧者於此動搖。§6 是解法:善巧者以慧限定「此光明無常有為緣生……」、隨觀「這不是我的、不是我、不是我的我」,解開三十結,確定「光明等非道;離了隨染已入於路的觀智才是道」——即道非道智見清淨;並收三諦之確定:見清淨定苦諦、度疑清淨定集諦、此清淨定道諦。〔所見〕這一頁是本弧、也是全書減法之尺的引爆點。把它和前面接起來看:第四品禪那的喜樂光明湧出時,論主提醒過那是腳手架不是終點;第九品慈的近敵是一個感覺幾乎一樣的贗品;這裡是同一堂課的最高一層——十隨染裡的光明喜樂幾乎就是第四品那杯酒的觀道版,而真正的染是第十項欣求:對前九的微細貪喜。前九本身不壞,黏上去才壞。道非道清淨的全部功夫就一句話:認出「這十樣不是道;繼續看生滅的無常苦無我,才是道」——連你自己修出來的好境界,都要看穿、不黏、放手。

§01 十觀隨染之名與其所起之人 → 白話 §1

於以少年觀已發起觀者,十種觀之隨染生起——不生於已得通達之聖弟子、不生於行邪道者與捨業處之懈怠者,而於正行道勤修不懈已發起觀之善男子必生。十者:光明・智・喜・輕安・樂・勝解・策勵・現起・捨・欣求(聖典:以無常作意時光明生,「光明是法」而轉向於光明,由此散亂——此即掉舉;心為掉舉所執者不如實了知以無常之現起;苦、無我亦然;智乃至欣求同)(白話 §1)。〔讀法〕先看誰會遇到它:只有修得對、修得勤的人——這是一個安慰也是一個警告:遇到隨染表示你走對了路,但正因走對了才有這個陷阱。聖典把它歸為「法之掉舉」:光明本身不是掉舉,「光明是法」而轉向於它、於是散亂——那才是。〔所見〕十名之中前九皆是好東西的名字(智、喜、樂、念、捨……),只有第十「欣求」是煩惱的名字;論主把它們並列,是要讀者一開始就別急著分好壞——先看它們怎麼把你帶離觀之路。

§02 光明之染——自結跏之處至一萬世界之量 → 白話 §2

光明=觀之光明;生起時瑜伽者執非道為道、非果為果:「我從前不曾有此光明,必已得道得果」——越出觀之路,捨根本業處而味著光明而坐。其量:或唯照結跏處、或室內、室外、全寺、一俱盧舍、半由旬、一由旬乃至自地至色究竟天成一片光明;於世尊照一萬世界。質多羅山雙壁屋中二長老於黑分布薩四方雲覆之夜:一說見塔院師子座上五色花,一說見大海一由旬處之魚龜(白話 §2)。〔讀法〕光明可以真的很大——大到照一萬世界(佛的),大到在黑夜裡看見一由旬深海裡的魚。論主不否認它的真實,只說:它不是道。「越出觀之路」是很準的一句:不是掉進坑,是走岔了——從觀生滅走到看光。〔所見〕二長老在黑夜裡比誰看得更遠——這則小故事沒有一句評語,但兩位比較的正是那個「我的光明」;讀者自己會看出他們在哪裡走岔。

§03 三事之敘——二長老、三長老、法施長老試大龍長老 → 白話 §3

隨染多生於得止觀者:為等至鎮伏之煩惱不現行,故起「我是阿羅漢」之心——如大龍長老、大達多長老、小善意長老。事:住多藍伽羅之法施長老(得無礙解之大漏盡者)思其阿闍梨大龍長老沙門事是否已到頂,見其仍凡夫、知不往則以凡夫命終,飛往問千問,長老一一無滯答之;問證得何時,答六十年前;請運定,請化白象,請令象豎耳直尾納鼻於口作可怖鳴衝來——長老照作,見象疾馳可怖之相,起身欲逃;法施抓其衣角:「漏盡者豈有怯懦?」長老知己凡夫,蹲坐足下求作依怙;法施說業處,長老登經行處第三步得阿羅漢果。彼長老瞋行者。如此比丘亦於光明中動搖(白話 §3)。〔讀法〕這是全書最動人的故事之一:六十年——一個能答一千個問題、能化白象的老修行者,六十年以為自己是阿羅漢;學生用一頭衝過來的象,讓他看見自己還會怕。然後他做了最了不起的一件事:在學生足下蹲坐,說「請作我的依怙」——三步得果。〔所見〕故事的重點不在老師錯了六十年,在他被指出時的乾脆——那乾脆正是他六十年功夫的證明。論主錄此事,是替所有「多分生於得止觀者」的隨染受害者留一條路:被人指出,馬上放下,路還在腳下。

§04 九染之逐一釋——智、喜、輕安、樂、勝解、策勵、現起、捨、欣求 → 白話 §4

智=觀之智:衡量度察色非色時生如帝釋所放金剛勢不可遏之銳利勇猛極明淨之智;喜=觀之喜:小喜・剎那喜・繼起喜・踊躍喜・遍滿喜五喜遍身;輕安=觀之輕安:身心無惱無重無粗無不堪任無病無曲,輕安輕柔堪任極明淨正直,領受非人之樂(偈:入空閑屋心寂靜之比丘正觀於法有非人之樂;隨所思惟諸蘊生滅得喜與悅——知者之不死);樂=觀之樂:遍潤全身極勝妙之樂;勝解=信:與觀相應成心心所極淨之強信;策勵=精進:不緩不過勤善策勵;現起=念:善住善立深入不動如山王之念,所轉向攝持作意省察之一一處皆深入躍入而現起如天眼見他世;捨=觀捨與轉向捨:於一切行中庸之觀捨強力生起,意門轉向捨亦然,如帝釋金剛、如投葉器之熾熱鐵箭勇猛銳利;欣求=觀之欣求:對以光明等所莊嚴之觀生作愛著而微細寂靜之相之欣求,甚至不能把握為煩惱。如光明,於此任一生起時瑜伽者執非道為道非果為果——越出觀之路,捨根本業處味著欣求而坐(白話 §4)。〔讀法〕九染逐一讀,會發現論主每一個都用最高的形容詞:金剛之智、五喜遍身、非人之樂、如山王之念、如熾熱鐵箭之捨——它們是真的好,好到像果。而第十「欣求」的描述最要命:「微細寂靜之相」「甚至不能把握為煩惱」——它偽裝成寂靜。〔所見〕「現起」是念——與 21-08 之後隨順智前的「至出起觀」不同科;這裡是念強到「如天眼見他世」的地步——連念都能成隨染,可見隨染不是「壞東西來了」,是「好東西被抓了」。這與 20-05 §5「我在觀」的病同源。

§05 十染之三十執——見執、慢執、愛執 → 白話 §5

光明等以其為隨染之事而說為隨染,非因其不善;欣求則既是隨染亦是隨染之事。依事十種,依執三十:執「我的光明生起了」=見執;執「光明生起了真可意」=慢執;味著光明=愛執——於光明依見慢渴愛三執,餘同。不善巧不聰慧者於此動搖散亂,把一一隨染隨觀為「這是我的、這是我、這是我的我」。古師偈:於光明於智於喜而動搖,於輕安於樂為此諸法心震動,於勝解於策勵於現起而動搖,於捨之轉向於捨於欣求亦然(白話 §5)。〔讀法〕十乘三等於三十:每一樣好東西都有三種抓法——「我的」(見)、「真可意」(慢)、「味著」(渴愛)。這三個正是 20-05 §5 那三句「我在觀・我觀得好・我能夠觀」的同一組病。〔所見〕「並不是因為它們是不善」——論主替前九樣正名:光明智喜輕安樂信精進念捨都是善法;染的是執。這一句救了很多修行人:你不用害怕光明,只用害怕「我的」。

§06 道非道之確定——三諦之確定與品末 → 白話 §6

善巧賢明聰慧具覺者於光明等生起時以慧限定觀察:「我的此光明生起了;而它無常有為緣生盡法衰法離貪法滅法」;或:「假使光明是我,執為我倒也可以;然而無我而被執為我——故以不自在之義無我、以已有而無之義無常、以生滅所逼之義苦」——依無色七法之理趣廣說;隨觀光明乃至欣求「這不是我的、不是我、不是我的我」——不動搖不震動(古師偈:此十處為其慧所遍知,善巧於法之掉舉而不趣散亂);解開三十隨染之結,確定「光明等非道;離了隨染已入於路的觀智才是道」——知「這是道這不是道」而住立之智=道非道智見清淨。至此亦作三諦之確定:見清淨以名色安立定苦諦、度疑清淨以緣把握定集諦、此清淨以正道確定定道諦——先以世間智定三諦。品末(白話 §6)。〔讀法〕解法只有一個動作:把光明當成任何一個行來觀——它無常、有為、緣生、盡衰離貪滅;它不是我的、不是我、不是我的我。用的正是 20-05 三句與 20-01 七法公式,沒有新法門。「離了隨染、已入於路的觀智才是道」——道不是另一個更高的境界,是把這十樣看穿之後繼續走的那條原路。〔所見〕三諦之確定是本品極漂亮的收筆:三個清淨各定一諦(苦・集・道),滅諦要留給智見清淨。這正是全弧那把尺最精純的一次:連你自己修出來的好境界,都要看穿、不黏、放手——第一品拆的是戒的勳章,第四品是禪的酒,第九品是慈的近敵,這裡是觀的光明。同一堂課,最高一層。

給一般讀者

最該記的一句:你最好的禪修經驗,也不是終點。光明、喜、樂、甚至觀捨與轉向捨與如山王的念,都可能湧出——它們大多是真的好東西,問題在你會把它們當成「我證道了」;黏上去,好東西就成了障。真正的染是第十項那絲微細的欣求,它偽裝成寂靜。解法沒有新招:把光明當成任何一個行來看——無常、有為、緣生;不是我的、不是我、不是我的我。看穿、不黏、繼續走原路。記住那位六十年的老長老:被學生一頭象指出還會怕,蹲坐求教,三步得果——被指出時的乾脆,才是功夫。

想讀本單元全文白話 §1–§6 即十觀隨染之名與所起之人、光明之染與其量、三長老與法施試大龍之事、九染逐一之釋、三十執、道非道之確定與三諦之確定的全段逐段全譯。

The page most worth remembering in the whole book: when insight reaches tender insight knowledge, illumination, knowledge, rapture, tranquillity, happiness, resolution, exertion, manifestation, equanimity, and a trace of subtle delight surge up. Most are not bad; the problem is that you may take them to mean “I have attained the path.” Recognizing that “these ten are not the path” is purification by knowledge and vision of what is and is not the path

The Big Picture — The Moment the Counterfeit Appears, and This Arc’s Purest Application of the Book’s Measure

The final sentence of the preceding unit gives the practitioner the title “one who has initiated insight.” This unit’s first sentence immediately says that the ten corruptions of insight arise in such a person—and only in a clansman who practices rightly, works diligently, and has initiated insight. They do not arise in a noble disciple, someone on a wrong path, or an indolent person (§1). Their names are illumination, knowledge, rapture, tranquillity, happiness, resolution, exertion, manifestation, equanimity, and delight. The Commentator first treats “illumination” in detail: when it arises, the practitioner takes what is not the path to be the path and what is not the fruit to be the fruit, abandons the root meditation subject, and sits savoring illumination. The extent of illumination ranges from the place where one sits cross-legged to ten thousand worlds, and the text adds a story of two elders seeing flowers and fish on a dark night (§2). It then records three elders who believed themselves arahants and tells how Elder Dhammadinna tested Elder Mahānāga with a conjured elephant: the practitioner of sixty years rose to flee when he saw the elephant, recognized that he was still an ordinary person, and attained arahantship in three steps (§3). The remaining nine corruptions are then explained in turn (§4); the last, “delight,” arises as attachment in a subtle, peaceful guise and cannot even be apprehended as a defilement. Section 5 says that the ten become thirty according to grasping—by view, conceit, and craving—and that an undiscerning person is shaken by them. Section 6 gives the remedy: one endowed with understanding delimits the illumination as “impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated,” contemplates it as “not mine, not I, not my self,” untangles the thirtyfold tangle, and determines: “Illumination and the rest are not the path; insight knowledge free from corruptions and entered upon the course is the path.” This is purification by knowledge and vision of what is and is not the path. The chapter closes by determining three truths: purification of view determines the truth of suffering, purification by overcoming doubt the truth of origin, and this purification the truth of the path. 〔Observation〕 This is the page where the subtractive measure of this arc—and of the whole book—detonates. Read it together with what came before: when the rapture, happiness, and illumination of jhāna surged up in Chapter 4, the Commentator warned that they were scaffolding rather than the destination; the near enemy of loving-kindness in Chapter 9 was a counterfeit with almost the same feeling. Here is the highest level of the same lesson. The illumination, rapture, and happiness among the ten corruptions are almost the insight-path version of Chapter 4’s cup of wine, while the real corruption is the tenth, delight: subtle pleasure in the first nine. The first nine are not themselves bad; attachment makes them bad. The entire work of this purification comes down to one sentence: recognize that “these ten are not the path; continuing to see arising and passing away as impermanent, suffering, and not-self is the path.” Even a good state produced by your own practice must be seen through, not clung to, and released.

§01 The Names of the Ten Corruptions of Insight and the Person in Whom They Arise → Vernacular §1

The ten corruptions of insight arise in one who has initiated insight through tender insight. They do not arise in a noble disciple who has reached penetration, in one following a wrong path, or in an indolent person who has abandoned the meditation subject; they certainly arise in a clansman who is practicing rightly, devoted to the work, and has initiated insight. The ten are illumination, knowledge, rapture, tranquillity, happiness, resolution, exertion, manifestation, equanimity, and delight. The canonical text says: when one attends as impermanent, illumination arises; adverting to illumination with the thought “illumination is a phenomenon” produces distraction, which is agitation. A mind seized by that agitation does not understand the manifestation as impermanent as it actually is; the same applies when attending as suffering or not-self, and the same pattern extends from knowledge through delight (vernacular §1). 〔Reading〕 First notice who encounters these corruptions: only someone who practices rightly and diligently. This is both consolation and warning. Encountering them means you are on the right road, but precisely because you are on the right road, this trap exists. The canonical text classifies it as “agitation about phenomena.” Illumination itself is not agitation; adverting to it with the thought “illumination is a phenomenon” and thereby becoming distracted is agitation. 〔Observation〕 The first nine of the ten bear the names of good things—knowledge, rapture, happiness, mindfulness, equanimity—while only the tenth, “delight,” bears the name of a defilement. The Commentator places them side by side so that the reader does not rush to divide them into good and bad, but first sees how they draw the practitioner away from the course of insight.

§02 The Corruption of Illumination—In Extent from One’s Cross-Legged Seat to Ten Thousand Worlds → Vernacular §2

Illumination is the illumination of insight. When it arises, the meditator takes what is not the path to be the path and what is not the fruit to be the fruit: “I never had such illumination before; I must have attained the path and fruit.” He leaves the course of insight, abandons the root meditation subject, and sits savoring illumination. Its extent may light only the cross-legged seat, or the room, outside the room, the whole monastery, a quarter yojana, half a yojana, one yojana, and so on, even forming one mass of light from earth to the Brahmā world of Akaniṭṭha. The Blessed One’s illumination lit ten thousand worlds. In a double-walled house at Cittalapabbata on a dark-fortnight observance night, with clouds covering every direction, two elders sat in darkness: one said that he saw five-colored flowers on the lion throne in the shrine courtyard; the other said he saw fish and turtles in the ocean a yojana away (vernacular §2). 〔Reading〕 Illumination can truly be immense—large enough to light ten thousand worlds in the Buddha’s case, or to see fish in the deep ocean a yojana away on a dark night. The Commentator does not deny its reality; he only says it is not the path. “Leaving the course of insight” is precise: one has not fallen into a pit but taken a side road—from observing arising and passing away to watching light. 〔Observation〕 The two elders compare who can see farther in the dark. The story offers no explicit comment, yet what they compare is precisely “my illumination.” Readers can see for themselves where the road forked.

§03 Three Accounts—Two Elders, Three Elders, and Elder Dhammadinna’s Test of Elder Mahānāga → Vernacular §3

The corruption mostly arises in those who have attained serenity and insight. Since defilements suppressed by attainment do not occur, the thought “I am an arahant” arises—as with Elders Mahānāga, Mahādatta, and Cūḷasumana. The story: Elder Dhammadinna of Talaṅgara, who had attained the analytical knowledges and was a great one whose influxes were destroyed, wondered whether his teacher Elder Mahānāga’s ascetic task had reached its summit. Seeing that the teacher was still an ordinary person and knowing that without his visit the elder would die as one, he flew there, asked a thousand questions, and received an unhindered answer to each. Asked when he had attained the Dhamma, the elder replied, “Sixty years ago.” Dhammadinna asked him to use concentration, create a white elephant, and make it raise its ears, extend its tail, put its trunk into its mouth, sound a terrifying cry, and charge. The elder did so, but at the sight of the terrifying elephant rushing toward him, he rose to flee. Dhammadinna caught the corner of his robe: “Is there timidity in one whose influxes are destroyed?” The elder recognized that he was an ordinary person, squatted at Dhammadinna’s feet, and asked him to be his refuge. Dhammadinna taught him a meditation subject; the elder mounted the walking path and attained arahantship on the third step. He was of a hating temperament. Bhikkhus of this kind too are shaken by illumination (vernacular §3). 〔Reading〕 This is one of the book’s most moving stories: sixty years—an old practitioner able to answer a thousand questions and conjure a white elephant had believed himself an arahant for sixty years. His student used an elephant charging toward him to show him that fear remained. Then the teacher did the most remarkable thing: he squatted at his student’s feet and said, “Please be my refuge.” Three steps later he attained the fruit. 〔Observation〕 The point is not that the teacher was wrong for sixty years but how cleanly he responded when shown. That clean response proves the work of those sixty years. The Commentator records this story to leave a road open for everyone harmed by corruptions that “mostly arise in those who have attained serenity and insight”: when shown, release it immediately; the road is still beneath your feet.

§04 The Nine Remaining Corruptions Explained One by One—Knowledge, Rapture, Tranquillity, Happiness, Resolution, Exertion, Manifestation, Equanimity, and Delight → Vernacular §4

Knowledge is knowledge of insight: as material and immaterial phenomena are weighed and investigated, sharp, courageous, exceedingly clear knowledge arises with irresistible force like Indra’s released thunderbolt. Rapture is the rapture of insight: the five kinds—minor, momentary, showering, uplifting, and pervading—fill the whole body. Tranquillity is the tranquillity of insight: body and mind are free of distress, heaviness, rigidity, unwieldiness, illness, and crookedness; tranquil, light, malleable, wieldy, exceedingly clear, and upright; they experience superhuman delight. The verse says that a peaceful-minded bhikkhu in an empty dwelling, rightly seeing phenomena, has superhuman delight; whenever he comprehends the aggregates’ arising and passing away, he gains rapture and gladness—the deathless for one who knows. Happiness is the happiness of insight, exceedingly sublime and suffusing the whole body. Resolution is faith, a strong faith associated with insight that is exceptional clarity of mind and mental factors. Exertion is energy, neither slack nor over-strained, but well exerted. Manifestation is mindfulness, well and firmly established, deeply planted, immovable like the king of mountains; whatever one adverts to, gathers, attends to, or reviews becomes manifest to mindfulness like the other world to the divine eye. Equanimity is insight equanimity and equanimity in adverting: the first is forceful neutrality toward all formations, while the second occurs at the mind door and proceeds sharply like Indra’s thunderbolt or a red-hot iron arrow thrown into a leaf receptacle. Delight is delight in insight: toward insight adorned with illumination and the rest, it arises as attachment in a subtle, peaceful guise and cannot even be apprehended as a defilement. As with illumination, when any of these arises, the meditator takes what is not the path for the path and what is not the fruit for the fruit, leaves the course of insight, abandons the root meditation subject, and sits savoring delight (vernacular §4). 〔Reading〕 Read the nine one by one and notice that the Commentator uses the highest descriptors for each: thunderbolt knowledge, five raptures filling the body, superhuman delight, mindfulness like the king of mountains, equanimity like a red-hot iron arrow. They are genuinely good—good enough to resemble the fruit. The description of the tenth, “delight,” is the most dangerous: it has “a subtle, peaceful guise” and “cannot even be apprehended as a defilement.” It disguises itself as peace. 〔Observation〕 “Manifestation” here is mindfulness and belongs to a different category from the “insight leading to emergence” before conformity knowledge after 21-08. Here mindfulness has become as strong as “the other world to the divine eye.” Even mindfulness can become a corruption, showing that corruption does not mean “a bad thing appeared”; it means “a good thing was grasped.” This has the same root as the illness “I contemplate” in 20-05 §5.

§05 The Thirty Graspings of the Ten Corruptions—Grasping by View, Conceit, and Craving → Vernacular §5

Illumination and the rest are called corruptions because they are bases for corruption, not because they are unwholesome; delight is both corruption and basis. As bases there are ten, but as graspings there are thirty: grasping “my illumination has arisen” is grasping by view; grasping “how agreeable that illumination has arisen” is grasping by conceit; savoring illumination is grasping by craving. Thus illumination has three graspings—view, conceit, and craving—and so does each of the rest. An unskillful, undiscerning person is shaken and distracted by them, contemplating each as “this is mine, this I am, this is my self.” The Ancients’ verse says he is shaken by illumination, knowledge, and rapture; his mind trembles because of tranquillity and happiness; he is shaken by resolution, exertion, manifestation, adverting to equanimity, equanimity itself, and delight (vernacular §5). 〔Reading〕 Ten times three equals thirty: each good thing can be grasped in three ways—“mine” is view, “how agreeable” is conceit, and “savoring” is craving. These are the same illnesses as the three statements in 20-05 §5: “I contemplate,” “I contemplate well,” and “I am able to contemplate.” 〔Observation〕 “Not because they are unwholesome”: the Commentator clears the names of the first nine. Illumination, knowledge, rapture, tranquillity, happiness, faith, energy, mindfulness, and equanimity are wholesome phenomena; grasping is the corruption. This sentence rescues many practitioners: you need not fear illumination, only “mine.”

§06 Determining What Is and Is Not the Path—Determining Three Truths and the Chapter’s Close → Vernacular §6

When illumination and the rest arise, a skillful, wise, discerning person endowed with understanding delimits and examines them with wisdom: “This illumination of mine has arisen; yet it is impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated, subject to exhaustion, decay, dispassion, and cessation.” Or: “If illumination were self, it would be proper to apprehend it as self; yet it is not-self and is apprehended as self. Therefore it is not-self in the sense of not being subject to mastery, impermanent in the sense of having been and then not being, and suffering in the sense of being oppressed by arising and passing away.” The method of the sevenfold method for the immaterial should be applied in detail. Illumination through delight is contemplated as “this is not mine, this I am not, this is not my self,” and the practitioner is not shaken. The Ancients’ verse says that when these ten bases are fully understood by wisdom, one is skillful in agitation about phenomena and does not proceed to distraction. Untangling the thirtyfold tangle, one determines: “Illumination and the rest are not the path; insight knowledge free from corruptions and entered upon the course is the path.” Knowledge standing after knowing “this is the path; this is not the path” is purification by knowledge and vision of what is and is not the path. Three truths have now been determined: purification of view determines the truth of suffering through the delimitation of name-and-form; purification by overcoming doubt determines the truth of origin through apprehension of conditions; and this purification determines the truth of the path through determining the right path. Thus three truths are first determined by mundane knowledge. The chapter ends (vernacular §6). 〔Reading〕 The remedy is one action: observe illumination as any other formation—it is impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated, subject to exhaustion, decay, dispassion, and cessation; it is not mine, not I, not my self. This uses the three statements of 20-05 and the sevenfold formula of 20-01; there is no new method. “Insight knowledge free from corruptions and entered upon the course is the path.” The path is not another, higher state; it is the original road continued after seeing through these ten. 〔Observation〕 The determination of three truths is a beautiful close to the chapter: three purifications each determine one truth—suffering, origin, and the path—while cessation remains for purification by knowledge and vision. This is the purest application of the whole arc’s measure: even a good state produced by your own practice must be seen through, not clung to, and released. Chapter 1 dismantles the medal of virtue, Chapter 4 the wine of jhāna, Chapter 9 the near enemy of loving-kindness, and here the illumination of insight. The same lesson at its highest level.

For the General Reader

The sentence most worth remembering is: your best meditation experience is not the destination. Illumination, rapture, happiness, even insight equanimity and equanimity in adverting and mindfulness like the king of mountains can surge up. Most are genuinely good; the problem is that you may take them to mean “I have attained the path.” Attach to them and good things become obstacles. The real corruption is the tenth, that trace of subtle delight, which disguises itself as peace. The remedy is not a new trick: regard illumination as any other formation—impermanent, conditioned, dependently originated; not mine, not I, not my self. See through it, do not cling, and continue on the original road. Remember the old elder of sixty years: when a student used an elephant to show that fear remained, he squatted down for instruction and attained the fruit in three steps. How cleanly you respond when shown—that is the practice.

To read this unit in full: Vernacular §§1–6 gives the complete, paragraph-by-paragraph translation of the names of the ten corruptions of insight and the people in whom they arise; the corruption of illumination and its extent; the three elders and Dhammadinna’s test of Mahānāga; the remaining nine corruptions; the thirty graspings; determining what is and is not the path; and determining the three truths.

考據Apparatus

一、科判定位

譯底 本單元之譯底=CSCD(內用不上站)。本層一切巴利逐字取自本單元原典欄之譯底,定位一式:〔CSCD §NN〕式對譯底欄逐字可核。本品無自家對頁之巴利,故頁域一概不記。

品名 道非道智見清淨 Maggāmaggañāṇadassanavisuddhi(品題行落於本品之首單元,本檔不重錄)。

篇名 譯底欄自帶 ### 行 2 個:### Vipassanupakkilesakathā(觀之隨染之說)與 ### Maggāmaggavavatthānakathā(道非道之確定之說)。後者為段內之題,本單元不再切——〔CSCD §732〕至〔CSCD §735〕落前題之下,〔CSCD §736〕落後題之下。

段號域 譯底欄之段號自〔CSCD §732〕至〔CSCD §736〕,實落段號 5 個,無缺、無重、無降序階。本篇於譯底欄之幅為 11,357 位元組——居本品七單元之第二(唯色七法思惟之單元之 17,342 為長)。

篇之骨——三層 ①〔CSCD §732〕出十觀隨染之名與其所起之人,引無礙解道之文;②〔CSCD §733〕至〔CSCD §734〕逐一釋十染,光明一染獨以三事實之,餘九各以一二句;③〔CSCD §735〕立十染之三十執而以古德偈收,〔CSCD §736〕以道非道之確定收全品,末總結三諦之確定與品末四行。

十觀隨染之名與其序 〔CSCD §732〕之名逐字為 Obhāso, ñāṇaṃ, pīti, passaddhi, sukhaṃ, adhimokkho, paggaho, upaṭṭhānaṃ, upekkhā, nikantī——十名之數與序於譯底欄逐字可核,本欄實測與本編既有校讀 §C 之十項逐一相符(其漢名逐字為光明・智・喜・輕安・樂・勝解・策勵・現起・捨・欣求)。既有校讀所附之三括注(勝解即信、策勵即精進、現起即念)亦逐一為論主之自釋:〔CSCD §734〕作 Adhimokkhoti saddhāPaggahoti vīriyaṃUpaṭṭhānanti sati校文所自陳之「十項之名與次第待校驗」一事,本欄已逐字核之而其名與序無一之差——誌其實。

論主自標之三類人 〔CSCD §732〕明十染之所不起與所起:不起者二類(paṭivedhappattassa ariyasāvakassa〔已得通達之聖弟子〕與 vippaṭipannakassa ca nikkhittakammaṭṭhānassa kusītapuggalassa〔邪行而棄業處之懈怠人〕),起者一類(Sammāpaṭipannakassa pana yuttapayuttassa āraddhavipassakassa kulaputtassa)。「唯正行者乃起」為本篇之關鍵判,論以 uppajjantiyeva 之強調式收之。

十染之釋之極不均 光明一染獨佔〔CSCD §733〕全段(約全篇之三分之一),其中三事實之——二長老之見(花與魚龜)、三長老之自謂阿羅漢、法施長老試大龍長老之事;而餘九染各唯一二句(〔CSCD §734〕)。釋之詳略懸殊,為本篇章法之特徵——本目誌其實而不代評。

論自標「隨染」之義 〔CSCD §735〕obhāsādayo upakkilesavatthutāya upakkilesāti vuttā, na akusalattā. Nikanti pana upakkileso ceva upakkilesavatthu ca.——光明等九以「為隨染之事」故名隨染而非以其為不善;唯欣求兼為隨染與隨染之事此為論主自釋其名之界,本欄逐字錄其位而不代評

三十執之算 〔CSCD §735〕Vatthuvaseneva cete dasa. Gāhavasena pana samatiṃsa honti.——依事為十,依執(見執、慢執、渴愛執)為三十。十乘三為三十之算於譯底欄逐字可核

篇末之收 本篇收於三諦之確定(evaṃ lokiyeneva tāva ñāṇena tiṇṇaṃ saccānaṃ vavatthānaṃ kataṃ hoti)——論以見清淨立苦諦、度疑清淨立集諦、本品立道諦,三品之功於此一句總收。其後為品末定式四行(Iti sādhujanapāmojjatthāya kate visuddhimaggePaññābhāvanādhikāreMaggāmaggañāṇadassanavisuddhiniddeso nāmaVīsatimo paricchedo.)。本品之品末四行落於本單元而不落於他單元——本品七單元之中唯此一單元載之。

前後接點 前承生滅智之單元:本篇首句 Athassa imāya taruṇavipassanāya āraddhavipassakassa dasa vipassanupakkilesā uppajjanti——逐字取前篇末之二語taruṇavipassanāāraddhavipassaka)。後接第 21 品:本品收於品末四行,次品即以離隨染之生滅智起——次品之首即承本篇「離隨染之觀智為道」之判

movement 品夾《總覽》繫本單元於 §C〈道非道智見清淨(第 20 品)— 認出「不是道」的那十樣〉一節;其所繫之章§逐字見該表,本目不重錄、不截取——段號與章§二系不明對映,不推估不換算。《總覽》§C 之題「認出『不是道』的那十樣」與其所立之「nikanti 為染之要」二事,其逐字所本皆在本篇:十染在〔CSCD §732〕,欣求之獨兼二義在〔CSCD §735〕。

二、詞義與譯語

本目只記本篇用法與其定位;名相定讀以規範詞表為準,詞表所未定者,本目不代定。前此諸品或本品前單元已立之讀不重解。以下唯列本篇新出者。

十觀隨染之名〔CSCD §732〕–〔CSCD §734〕

巴利本編用語本篇用法之要定位
vipassanupakkilesa觀之隨染本篇之題與其綱;本篇之屈折二形(vipassanupakkilesāvipassanupakkileso〔CSCD §732〕
obhāsa光明十染之一;論釋為 vipassanobhāso〔CSCD §732〕・〔CSCD §733〕
ñāṇa十染之二;論釋為 vipassanāñāṇaṃ〔CSCD §734〕
pīti十染之三;論釋為 vipassanāpīti,出五種〔CSCD §734〕
passaddhi輕安十染之四;論釋為 vipassanāpassaddhi〔CSCD §734〕
sukha十染之五;論釋為 vipassanāsukhaṃ〔CSCD §734〕
adhimokkha勝解十染之六;論自釋 Adhimokkhoti saddhā(即信)〔CSCD §734〕
paggaha策勵十染之七;論自釋 Paggahoti vīriyaṃ(即精進)〔CSCD §734〕
upaṭṭhāna現起十染之八;論自釋 Upaṭṭhānanti sati(即念)〔CSCD §734〕
upekkhā十染之九;論分 vipassanupekkhā(觀捨)與 āvajjanupekkhā(轉向捨)二〔CSCD §734〕
nikanti欣求十染之十;論釋為 vipassanānikanti,並自標其 kilesoti pariggahetumpi na sakkā(不可執之為煩惱)〔CSCD §734〕

光明之染與其事〔CSCD §733〕

巴利本編用語本篇用法之要定位
amaggameva maggoti以非道為道誤認之語;本篇二見〔CSCD §733〕・〔CSCD §734〕
vipassanāvīthi ukkantā越觀之路誤認之果;本篇二見〔CSCD §733〕・〔CSCD §734〕
mūlakammaṭṭhāna根本業處所棄者;本篇二見〔CSCD §733〕・〔CSCD §734〕
pallaṅkaṭṭhānamatta唯結跏之處光明之最小之量〔CSCD §733〕
dasasahassilokadhātu一萬世界世尊之光明之量——與行者之量為對〔CSCD §733〕
vemattatā差別光明之量之不齊之名〔CSCD §733〕
kāḷapakkhuposatha黑分布薩二長老之事之時〔CSCD §733〕
caturaṅgasamannāgataṃ tamaṃ具四支之闇同上之相〔CSCD §733〕
samathavipassanālābhī得止觀者此染多起之人〔CSCD §733〕
samāpattivikkhambhitā kilesā為等至所鎮伏之諸煩惱自謂阿羅漢之由〔CSCD §733〕
pabhinnapaṭisambhida得無礙解者法施長老之相〔CSCD §733〕
mahākhīṇāsava大漏盡者同上之第二相〔CSCD §733〕
puthujjanakālakiriyā凡夫之命終法施長老所預見者〔CSCD §733〕
sārajja怯懦試之所顯:khīṇāsavassa sārajjaṃ nāma hotī〔CSCD §733〕
dosacarita瞋行者大龍長老之性行〔CSCD §733〕

九染之相〔CSCD §734〕

巴利本編用語本篇用法之要定位
vissaṭṭhaindavajira所放之帝釋之金剛智與轉向捨二處之喻;本篇二見〔CSCD §734〕
khuddakāpīti小喜五喜之一〔CSCD §734〕
khaṇikāpīti剎那喜五喜之二〔CSCD §734〕
okkantikāpīti繼起喜五喜之三〔CSCD §734〕
ubbegāpīti踊躍喜五喜之四〔CSCD §734〕
pharaṇāpīti遍滿喜五喜之五〔CSCD §734〕
daratha・gārava・kakkhaḷatā・akammaññatā・gelañña・vaṅkatā惱・重・粗・不堪任・病・曲輕安所無之六過〔CSCD §734〕
passaddha・lahu・mudu・kammañña・suvisada・uju輕安・輕・柔・堪任・極明淨・直輕安所有之六德——與上六過逐一為對〔CSCD §734〕
amānusī rati非人之樂輕安之果;論引法句之偈證之〔CSCD §734〕
atisayapasādabhūtā balavatī saddhā成極淨之強信勝解之相〔CSCD §734〕
asithila・anaccāraddha・supaggahita不緩・不過勤・善策勵策勵之三相〔CSCD §734〕
supaṭṭhitā supatiṭṭhitā nikhātā acalā pabbatarājasadisā善住・善立・深入・不動・如山王現起之五相〔CSCD §734〕
vipassanupekkhā觀捨捨之二分之一:sabbasaṅkhāresu majjhattabhūtā〔CSCD §734〕
āvajjanupekkhā轉向捨捨之二分之二:於意門〔CSCD §734〕
ālayaṃ kurumānā sukhumā santākārā作愛著而微細寂靜之相愛著之相〔CSCD §734〕

三十執與道非道之確定〔CSCD §735〕–〔CSCD §736〕

巴利本編用語本篇用法之要定位
upakkilesavatthu隨染之事十染之所以名染之由;本篇二見(upakkilesavatthutāyaupakkilesavatthu〔CSCD §735〕
gāhavasena samatiṃsa依執為三十十染各三執之總〔CSCD §735〕
diṭṭhigāha見執三執之一:Mama obhāso uppanno〔CSCD §735〕
mānagāha慢執三執之二:manāpo vata obhāso uppanno〔CSCD §735〕
taṇhāgāha渴愛執三執之三:obhāsaṃ assādayato〔CSCD §735〕
akusalo abyatto不善巧不聰慧者為三十執所動者〔CSCD §735〕
kusalo paṇḍito byatto buddhisampanno善巧・賢・聰慧・具覺者不為所動者——與上為對〔CSCD §736〕
upakkilesajaṭa隨染之結所當解者:taṃ samatiṃsavidhaṃ upakkilesajaṭaṃ vijaṭetvā〔CSCD §736〕
upakkilesavimutta離隨染者道之定義之前分〔CSCD §736〕
vīthipaṭipanna已入路者道之定義之後分〔CSCD §736〕
maggāmaggavavatthāna道非道之確定本篇後段之題與其所成〔CSCD §736〕
tiṇṇaṃ saccānaṃ vavatthāna三諦之確定全品之收;本段二見〔CSCD §736〕
sammāmaggassa avadhāraṇa正道之確定道諦之確定之由〔CSCD §736〕

三、異讀

材料之面 本篇無自家對頁之巴利,故無校勘段可錄;可查之面唯譯底欄自身。誌錄不判。

普查之實測 譯底欄全篇逐字普查:異讀括注式((sī.)(syā.)(kaṃ.)(pī.) 等)零命中;異誦之標識詞 pāṭho 零命中異說之標識詞 porāṇā 實測 2 見——其為引古德之偈之標識(Tenāhu porāṇā –),非異讀之記,故不入異讀之列而別記於引據之目。方括注唯二式([§NN] 段號 5 個與版頁記 12 個,後者皆在註記之內)。圓括注 7 處,逐一為出處標記,無非出處之括注。引號標記 '' 實測 74 處——為本品七單元之最多查無即記無:譯底欄自身無異讀之記。

本欄自出之一處字面之不齊 同一「已得道果」之自謂,〔CSCD §733〕作 addhā maggappattosmi phalapattosmī,而〔CSCD §734〕作 addhā maggappattosmi phalappattosmī——前者之第二詞作 phalapattosmī 而後者作 phalappattosmī——一單一雙同句二見而一字之形不齊。本目誌其字面之實而不判其為傳本之別、清檔之記或論主之筆。

本欄自出之第二處 〔CSCD §732〕之十染之名,其第十作 nikantī(長 ī),而〔CSCD §734〕之釋作 Nikantīti vipassanānikanti(釋語之首作長 ī 而所釋之詞作短 i)。誌其實而不判。

本編既有校讀所待校驗之一事,本欄已核 既有校讀之 §C 自陳「十觀隨染十項之名與次第待校驗」。本欄對譯底欄逐字核之:〔CSCD §732〕之十名與其序為 Obhāso, ñāṇaṃ, pīti, passaddhi, sukhaṃ, adhimokkho, paggaho, upaṭṭhānaṃ, upekkhā, nikantī與既有校讀之十項逐一相符,無一之差;〔CSCD §734〕之釋序與〔CSCD §735〕之古德偈之序亦同。校讀所附之三括注(信・精進・念)亦逐一為論主之自釋。誌其核之實。

本欄之界 上列皆為譯底欄之字面之實;未與 PTS 掃描頁對勘。本欄之零命中唯就譯底欄一面,不以之推斷他本。

四、論主引據

論主自引之處,逐處繫段號錨;出處唯本文自標者記之,不代考定。「本文自標之出處」欄之括注逐字照錄,不代譯其經名。

位置引式〔逐字〕所引之要本文自標之出處
〔CSCD §732〕Vuttañhetaṃ –''Kathaṃ dhammuddhaccaviggahitamānasaṃ hoti? Aniccato manasikaroto obhāso uppajjati, 'obhāso dhammo'ti obhāsaṃ āvajjati, tato vikkhepo uddhaccaṃ.十染之所本——為法之掉舉所持之心(paṭi. ma. 2.6)
〔CSCD §734〕Yaṃ sandhāya vuttaṃ –''Suññāgāraṃ paviṭṭhassa, santacittassa bhikkhuno; Amānusī rati hoti, sammā dhammaṃ vipassato.非人之樂之所本(dha. pa. 373-374)
〔CSCD §735〕Obhāsādīsu ekekaṃ ''etaṃ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā''ti括注插於引句與 samanupassati 之間,引截至括注之前三執之經句(ma. ni. 1.241)
〔CSCD §735〕Tenāhu porāṇā –''Obhāse ceva ñāṇe ca, pītiyā ca vikampati;古德偈之一——十處之動(paṭi. ma. 2.7)
〔CSCD §736〕So evaṃ upaparikkhitvā obhāsaṃ ''netaṃ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā''ti括注插於引句與 samanupassati 之間三執之反之經句(ma. ni. 1.241)
〔CSCD §736〕Ñāṇaṃ…pe… nikantiṃ ''netaṃ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā''ti括注插於引句與 samanupassati 之間同上之推廣(ma. ni. 1.241)
〔CSCD §736〕Tenāhu porāṇā –''Imāni dasa ṭhānāni, paññāyassa pariccitā; Dhammuddhaccakusalo hoti, na ca vikkhepaṃ gacchatī''ti.古德偈之二——善巧者不散亂(paṭi. ma. 2.7)

引式之數〔本欄實測〕 Vuttañhetaṃ 1 處Tenāhu 2 處Yaṃ sandhāya vuttaṃ 1 處kira 7 處——kira(傳說)為本品七單元之最多,逐一在九染之相之敘(Tassa kira 之族 6 見)與二長老之事之開(cittalapabbate kira)之內。YathāhaVuttampi cetaṃTenāha 俱零命中。本文自標之圓括注出處 7 處・4 種,其分布為無礙解道 3(paṭi. ma. 2.6paṭi. ma. 2.7 二見)・中部 3(ma. ni. 1.241 三見)・法句 1。中部之同一句三見etaṃ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā 之正反二式)——同一出處三繫,為本篇引之特徵。此數唯就本篇之域,不及全書。

古德偈二首之對稱 〔CSCD §735〕之偈言「不善巧者於十處動」,〔CSCD §736〕之偈言「善巧者不散亂」——二偈同繫 (paṭi. ma. 2.7) 而分立於本篇之二段,其義正相反為本篇「非道—道」二分之偈證

三事之敘與其人名 〔CSCD §733〕之三事,其人名逐字為:cittalapabbate 之二長老(不出名)・uccavālikavāsī mahānāgattherohaṃkanakavāsī mahādattattherocittalapabbate niṅkapeṇṇakapadhānagharavāsī cūḷasumanattherotalaṅgaravāsī dhammadinnatthero五名皆繫其住處而不繫出處括注——論以傳說之事實之而不引經,本目逐字錄其名與位而不代考定其人。

五、譬喻·修辭

本目只記本篇譬喻之所在與其所配,不作文學評價。

甲・譬喻 本篇之比況語實測:viya 詞界 5 見、連聲之比況形 2 見vissaṭṭhaindavajiramiva 二見)、sadisa 諸形 1 見pabbatarājasadisā)、upamā 諸形 零命中Yathā ca 起之對句式喻 1 見

位置譬喻所配之義
〔CSCD §733〕uccavālikavāsī mahānāgatthero viya haṃkanakavāsī mahādattatthero viya cittalapabbate niṅkapeṇṇakapadhānagharavāsī cūḷasumanatthero viya ca如三長老之自謂阿羅漢——viya 並列而其喻體為人事
〔CSCD §734〕vissaṭṭhaindavajiramiva avihatavegaṃ tikhiṇaṃ sūraṃ ativisadaṃ ñāṇaṃ uppajjati如所放之帝釋之金剛——觀智之銳
〔CSCD §734〕dibbacakkhuno paraloko viya satiyā upaṭṭhāti如天眼者之他世——念之現起
〔CSCD §734〕nikhātā acalā pabbatarājasadisā sati如山王之不動——念之相
〔CSCD §734〕vissaṭṭhaindavajiramiva pattapuṭe pakkhitta tattanārāco viya ca sūrā tikhiṇā hutvā vahati如所放之金剛、如投於葉器之熱鐵箭——轉向捨之銳

譬喻之分布 本篇之喻五處之中四處皆在〔CSCD §734〕之九染之相之內,而〔CSCD §733〕之光明一段唯一處(三長老之並列),〔CSCD §735〕與〔CSCD §736〕全無喻光明一段之長而喻之少,其由為該段以事實之而不以喻明——本目誌其實而不代評。

乙・修辭之可核觀察 ①Kathaṃ? 之引釋式實測 2 見(〔CSCD §735〕之三十執之算與〔CSCD §736〕之三諦之確定),? 全篇 4 見——其一在所引之經文之內Kathaṃ dhammuddhaccaviggahitamānasaṃ hoti?);Katame pana te dasa upakkilesāti? 為論主自問,在〔CSCD §732〕之 Vuttañhetaṃ 之前。②Tassa kira tasmiṃ samaye 之敘式實測 3 見(喜、輕安、樂三染各一;捨之段作 Tasmiṃ hissa samaye)——四染之相以同一句式起,為〔CSCD §734〕之節拍。③以「觀」為冠之複合語實測 16 見,其形逐字為 vipassanāya(二見)・vipassanupakkilesāvipassanobhāsovipassanāvīthi(二見)・vipassanupakkilesovipassanālābhinovipassanāñāṇaṃ(二見)・vipassanāpītivipassanāpassaddhivipassanāsukhaṃvipassanupekkhāvipassanupekkhāpivipassanānikanti——十染之釋皆以「觀之某某」冠之,為本篇之定式。④amaggameva ''maggo''ti aphalameva ca ''phala''nti gaṇhāti 之句於〔CSCD §733〕與〔CSCD §734〕逐字二見——同句二重出,為十染之通患之標識。⑤縮排之偈行:四空格之行 10 行(法句偈 4 行、古德偈二首 6 行),二空格之行 4 行(品末定式)。⑥…pe… 省略式 3 見。⑦Yathā ca obhāse, evaṃ etesupiYathā ca obhāse, evaṃ sesesupi 之推廣式 2 見——二式之後半不齊(一作 etesupi 一作 sesesupi)。 以上諸數唯就本篇之域實測,不及全書。

六、章內互讀

每指皆帶段號錨;所指之處唯就本篇文中可核之名相立——本篇之段號與章§二系不明對映,故所指不繫章§,亦不推估換算。不代考定。

本篇之處所指可核之由
〔CSCD §732〕 Athassa imāya taruṇavipassanāya āraddhavipassakassa dasa vipassanupakkilesā uppajjanti生滅智之單元〔CSCD §731〕前篇末立少年觀智與已發起觀者二名,本篇首句逐字取之
〔CSCD §732〕 Vipassanupakkilesā hi paṭivedhappattassa ariyasāvakassa ceva思惟智之單元〔CSCD §692〕彼篇立「已發起觀者起光明等故有道非道智」,本篇即其廣說
〔CSCD §733〕 Bhagavato pana dasasahassilokadhātuṃ obhāsento udapādi六隨念之諸單元佛德之諸單元立世尊之光明之量,本篇以之與行者之量為對
〔CSCD §734〕 khuddakāpīti, khaṇikāpīti, okkantikāpīti, ubbegāpīti, pharaṇāpītīti ayaṃ pañcavidhā pīti地遍之諸單元五種喜之立在彼,本篇取其名而不重釋
〔CSCD §736〕無色七法思惟之單元〔CSCD §721〕論自標本段之廣說當依彼篇之三假設式(sabbaṃ arūpasattake vuttanayena vitthāretabbaṃ
〔CSCD §736〕 Diṭṭhivisuddhiyaṃ tāva nāmarūpassa vavatthāpanena dukkhasaccassa vavatthānaṃ kataṃ見清淨之品彼品以名色之確定立苦諦
〔CSCD §736〕 Kaṅkhāvitaraṇavisuddhiyaṃ paccayapariggahaṇena samudayasaccassa vavatthānaṃ度疑清淨之品彼品以緣之攝受立集諦

七、傳本

作者、傳本與注疏源流諸問題,本編不於考據內立說。

I. Placement in the Outline

Base text This unit’s base text is CSCD (for internal use and never published online). Every Pāli string in this layer is copied verbatim from this unit’s base-text column, and loci uniformly take the form 〔CSCD §NN〕 for verbatim checking against that column. Because this chapter has no edition-owned facing Pāli, no page range is recorded.

Chapter title Purification by Knowledge and Vision of What Is and Is Not the Path, Maggāmaggañāṇadassanavisuddhi (the chapter-title line occurs in the first unit of this chapter and is not repeated here).

Section titles The base-text column contains two ### lines: ### Vipassanupakkilesakathā (The Exposition of the Corruptions of Insight) and ### Maggāmaggavavatthānakathā (The Exposition of Determining What Is and Is Not the Path). The latter is an internal title and does not create another unit: 〔CSCD §732〕 through 〔CSCD §735〕 fall under the former title, while 〔CSCD §736〕 falls under the latter.

Paragraph-number range The base-text column runs from 〔CSCD §732〕 through 〔CSCD §736〕, with 5 paragraph numbers actually present and no omissions, repetitions, or descending sequence. This section spans 11,357 bytes in the base-text column—the second longest of this chapter’s seven units (only the unit on comprehension of form by the sevenfold method, at 17,342 bytes, is longer).

The section’s three-tier skeleton (1) 〔CSCD §732〕 gives the names of the ten corruptions of insight and the persons in whom they arise, citing the Paṭisambhidāmagga; (2) 〔CSCD §733〕 through 〔CSCD §734〕 explain the ten one by one, substantiating illumination alone with three accounts while treating each of the other nine in one or two sentences; (3) 〔CSCD §735〕 establishes the thirty graspings of the ten corruptions and closes with a stanza of the Ancients, while 〔CSCD §736〕 concludes the entire chapter by determining what is and is not the path, then summarizes the determination of three truths and gives the four-line chapter colophon.

The names and order of the ten corruptions of insight The names in 〔CSCD §732〕 are verbatim Obhāso, ñāṇaṃ, pīti, passaddhi, sukhaṃ, adhimokkho, paggaho, upaṭṭhānaṃ, upekkhā, nikantītheir number and order are verifiable verbatim in the base-text column, and a literal measurement here matches each of the ten items in this edition’s existing checked reading for §C (illumination, knowledge, rapture, tranquillity, happiness, resolution, exertion, manifestation, equanimity, and delight). The three parenthetical identifications in that checked reading—resolution as faith, exertion as energy, and manifestation as mindfulness—are likewise the Commentator’s own explanations: 〔CSCD §734〕 has Adhimokkhoti saddhā, Paggahoti vīriyaṃ, and Upaṭṭhānanti sati. The checked reading’s own statement that “the names and sequence of the ten corruptions of insight await verification” has now been tested verbatim against this column, with no difference in any name or its order. The fact is recorded.

Three classes of persons expressly marked by the Commentator 〔CSCD §732〕 states in whom the ten corruptions do and do not arise. They do not arise in two classes: paṭivedhappattassa ariyasāvakassa (a noble disciple who has reached penetration) and vippaṭipannakassa ca nikkhittakammaṭṭhānassa kusītapuggalassa (an indolent person who follows a wrong path and has laid aside the meditation subject). They arise in one class: Sammāpaṭipannakassa pana yuttapayuttassa āraddhavipassakassa kulaputtassa. “They arise only in one who practices rightly” is the section’s key judgment, and the treatise closes the statement with the emphatic uppajjantiyeva.

Extreme unevenness in the explanation of the ten corruptions Illumination alone occupies all of 〔CSCD §733〕 (about one-third of the entire section) and is substantiated through three accounts: the two elders’ visions of flowers and of fish and turtles; the three elders who took themselves to be arahants; and Elder Dhammadinna’s test of Elder Mahānāga. Each of the other nine corruptions receives only one or two sentences in 〔CSCD §734〕. This disparity in detail is a feature of the section’s composition; the apparatus records the fact without evaluating it.

The treatise’s own explanation of “corruption” 〔CSCD §735〕 states obhāsādayo upakkilesavatthutāya upakkilesāti vuttā, na akusalattā. Nikanti pana upakkileso ceva upakkilesavatthu ca.the first nine, illumination and the rest, are called corruptions because they are bases for corruption, not because they are unwholesome; delight alone is both a corruption and a basis for corruption. This is the boundary established by the Commentator’s own explanation of the term. The apparatus records its location verbatim without evaluating it.

Calculation of the thirty graspings 〔CSCD §735〕 states Vatthuvaseneva cete dasa. Gāhavasena pana samatiṃsa honti.—as bases they are ten; as graspings—by view, conceit, and craving—they are thirty. The calculation ten times three equals thirty is verifiable verbatim in the base-text column.

The section’s close The section closes with the determination of three truths (evaṃ lokiyeneva tāva ñāṇena tiṇṇaṃ saccānaṃ vavatthānaṃ kataṃ hoti)—the treatise establishes the truth of suffering through purification of view, the truth of origin through purification by overcoming doubt, and the truth of the path through this chapter, gathering the work of three chapters into one sentence. This is followed by the four-line chapter colophon (Iti sādhujanapāmojjatthāya kate visuddhimagge, Paññābhāvanādhikāre, Maggāmaggañāṇadassanavisuddhiniddeso nāma, Vīsatimo paricchedo.). The chapter’s four closing lines fall in this unit and no other—this is the only one of the chapter’s seven units that contains them.

Connections before and after This section follows the unit on knowledge of arising and passing away. Its opening sentence, Athassa imāya taruṇavipassanāya āraddhavipassakassa dasa vipassanupakkilesā uppajjanti, takes up two terms verbatim from the preceding section’s close (taruṇavipassanā and āraddhavipassaka). It is followed by Chapter 21: this chapter closes with the four-line colophon, and the next begins with knowledge of arising and passing away free from corruption—the next chapter’s opening directly carries forward this section’s judgment that insight knowledge free from corruption is the path.

Movement The chapter-level Overview links this unit to §C, “Purification by Knowledge and Vision of What Is and Is Not the Path (Chapter 20)—Recognizing Those Ten Things That Are ‘Not the Path.’” The chapter sections assigned there are given verbatim in that table and are neither repeated nor excerpted here. Because the paragraph-number and chapter-section systems have no known mapping, none is inferred or converted. Two matters in the title of Overview §C—“recognizing those ten things that are not the path” and its designation of nikanti as the crux of the corruption—are both grounded verbatim in this section: the ten corruptions appear in 〔CSCD §732〕, while delight’s unique double status appears in 〔CSCD §735〕.

II. Terms and Renderings

This section records only usage and placement within this unit. Normative terminology is governed by the registries; terms not determined there are not determined by this apparatus. Readings established in earlier chapters or earlier units of this chapter are not re-explained. Only terms new to this unit are listed below.

Names of the ten corruptions of insight 〔CSCD §732〕–〔CSCD §734〕

PāliRenderingUsage in this unitLocus
vipassanupakkilesacorruption of insightThis section’s title and framework; two inflected forms occur (vipassanupakkilesā and vipassanupakkileso)〔CSCD §732〕
obhāsailluminationFirst of the ten; explained as vipassanobhāso〔CSCD §732〕・〔CSCD §733〕
ñāṇaknowledgeSecond of the ten; explained as vipassanāñāṇaṃ〔CSCD §734〕
pītiraptureThird of the ten; explained as vipassanāpīti, with five kinds given〔CSCD §734〕
passaddhitranquillityFourth of the ten; explained as vipassanāpassaddhi〔CSCD §734〕
sukhahappinessFifth of the ten; explained as vipassanāsukhaṃ〔CSCD §734〕
adhimokkharesolutionSixth of the ten; the treatise itself explains Adhimokkhoti saddhā (that is, faith)〔CSCD §734〕
paggahaexertionSeventh of the ten; the treatise itself explains Paggahoti vīriyaṃ (that is, energy)〔CSCD §734〕
upaṭṭhānamanifestationEighth of the ten; the treatise itself explains Upaṭṭhānanti sati (that is, mindfulness)〔CSCD §734〕
upekkhāequanimityNinth of the ten; divided into vipassanupekkhā (insight equanimity) and āvajjanupekkhā (equanimity in adverting)〔CSCD §734〕
nikantidelightTenth of the ten; explained as vipassanānikanti, and expressly said to be kilesoti pariggahetumpi na sakkā (not apprehensible as a defilement)〔CSCD §734〕

The corruption of illumination and its accounts 〔CSCD §733〕

PāliRenderingUsage in this unitLocus
amaggameva maggotitaking what is not the path to be the pathLanguage of misidentification; occurs twice〔CSCD §733〕・〔CSCD §734〕
vipassanāvīthi ukkantāleaving the course of insightResult of the misidentification; occurs twice〔CSCD §733〕・〔CSCD §734〕
mūlakammaṭṭhānaroot meditation subjectWhat is abandoned; occurs twice〔CSCD §733〕・〔CSCD §734〕
pallaṅkaṭṭhānamattaonly the place of sitting cross-leggedThe smallest extent of illumination〔CSCD §733〕
dasasahassilokadhātuten-thousandfold world-systemExtent of the Blessed One’s illumination—contrasted with that of practitioners〔CSCD §733〕
vemattatāvariationDesignation for the unequal extent of illumination〔CSCD §733〕
kāḷapakkhuposathaobservance day of the dark fortnightTime of the account of the two elders〔CSCD §733〕
caturaṅgasamannāgataṃ tamaṃfour-factored darknessDescription in the same account〔CSCD §733〕
samathavipassanālābhīone who has attained serenity and insightPerson in whom this corruption mostly arises〔CSCD §733〕
samāpattivikkhambhitā kilesādefilements suppressed by attainmentReason for taking oneself to be an arahant〔CSCD §733〕
pabhinnapaṭisambhidaone who has attained the analytical knowledgesCharacteristic of Elder Dhammadinna〔CSCD §733〕
mahākhīṇāsavagreat one whose influxes are destroyedHis second characteristic〔CSCD §733〕
puthujjanakālakiriyādeath as an ordinary personWhat Elder Dhammadinna foresaw〔CSCD §733〕
sārajjatimidityWhat the test revealed: khīṇāsavassa sārajjaṃ nāma hotī〔CSCD §733〕
dosacaritaone of hating temperamentElder Mahānāga’s temperament〔CSCD §733〕

Characteristics of the nine remaining corruptions 〔CSCD §734〕

PāliRenderingUsage in this unitLocus
vissaṭṭhaindavajiraIndra’s released thunderboltSimile for knowledge and equanimity in adverting; occurs twice〔CSCD §734〕
khuddakāpītiminor raptureFirst of the five kinds of rapture〔CSCD §734〕
khaṇikāpītimomentary raptureSecond of the five〔CSCD §734〕
okkantikāpītishowering raptureThird of the five〔CSCD §734〕
ubbegāpītiuplifting raptureFourth of the five〔CSCD §734〕
pharaṇāpītipervading raptureFifth of the five〔CSCD §734〕
daratha・gārava・kakkhaḷatā・akammaññatā・gelañña・vaṅkatādistress, heaviness, rigidity, unwieldiness, sickness, crookednessSix defects absent when tranquillity arises〔CSCD §734〕
passaddha・lahu・mudu・kammañña・suvisada・ujutranquil, light, malleable, wieldy, exceedingly clear, uprightSix qualities present with tranquillity—corresponding one by one to the six defects above〔CSCD §734〕
amānusī ratisuperhuman delightResult of tranquillity; supported by a cited Dhammapada stanza〔CSCD §734〕
atisayapasādabhūtā balavatī saddhāstrong faith constituting extraordinary clarityCharacteristic of resolution〔CSCD §734〕
asithila・anaccāraddha・supaggahitanot slack, not over-strained, well exertedThree characteristics of exertion〔CSCD §734〕
supaṭṭhitā supatiṭṭhitā nikhātā acalā pabbatarājasadisāwell established, firmly established, deeply planted, immovable, like the king of mountainsFive characteristics of manifestation〔CSCD §734〕
vipassanupekkhāinsight equanimityFirst division of equanimity: sabbasaṅkhāresu majjhattabhūtā〔CSCD §734〕
āvajjanupekkhāequanimity in advertingSecond division of equanimity: at the mind door〔CSCD §734〕
ālayaṃ kurumānā sukhumā santākārāmaking attachment and having a subtle, peaceful aspectCharacteristic of delight〔CSCD §734〕

The thirty graspings and determining what is and is not the path 〔CSCD §735〕–〔CSCD §736〕

PāliRenderingUsage in this unitLocus
upakkilesavatthubasis for corruptionWhy the ten are called corruptions; two forms occur (upakkilesavatthutāya and upakkilesavatthu)〔CSCD §735〕
gāhavasena samatiṃsathirty as graspingsTotal of three graspings for each of the ten corruptions〔CSCD §735〕
diṭṭhigāhagrasping by viewFirst of three: Mama obhāso uppanno〔CSCD §735〕
mānagāhagrasping by conceitSecond of three: manāpo vata obhāso uppanno〔CSCD §735〕
taṇhāgāhagrasping by cravingThird of three: obhāsaṃ assādayato〔CSCD §735〕
akusalo abyattounskillful and undiscerningThe person shaken by the thirty graspings〔CSCD §735〕
kusalo paṇḍito byatto buddhisampannoskillful, wise, discerning, endowed with understandingThe person not shaken—contrasted with the preceding〔CSCD §736〕
upakkilesajaṭatangle of corruptionsWhat is to be untangled: taṃ samatiṃsavidhaṃ upakkilesajaṭaṃ vijaṭetvā〔CSCD §736〕
upakkilesavimuttafree from corruptionsFirst part of the definition of the path〔CSCD §736〕
vīthipaṭipannaentered upon the courseSecond part of the definition of the path〔CSCD §736〕
maggāmaggavavatthānadetermining what is and is not the pathTitle of the latter section and what it accomplishes〔CSCD §736〕
tiṇṇaṃ saccānaṃ vavatthānadetermining three truthsClose of the chapter; occurs twice in the paragraph〔CSCD §736〕
sammāmaggassa avadhāraṇadetermining the right pathGround for determining the truth of the path〔CSCD §736〕

III. Variant Readings

Material surface This section has no edition-owned facing Pāli, so no collation passage can be recorded; the only searchable surface is the base-text column itself. Facts are recorded without judgment.

Exhaustive scan A literal whole-section scan of the base-text column found zero occurrences of parenthetical variant formulas such as (sī.), (syā.), (kaṃ.), and (pī.), and zero occurrences of the variant-reading marker pāṭho. The alternate-account marker porāṇā occurs twice—both are markers introducing stanzas of the Ancients (Tenāhu porāṇā –), not records of variant readings, and so are recorded separately under citations rather than included among variants. Square brackets occur only in two forms: five [§NN] paragraph numbers and twelve edition-page markers, all the latter within notes. There are 7 parentheticals, each a source reference, and no non-source parenthetical. The quotation marker '' occurs 74 timesthe most among this chapter’s seven units. Nothing found is recorded as nothing found: the base-text column itself contains no recorded variant.

One literal inconsistency arising within this column The self-claim of having attained path and fruit appears as addhā maggappattosmi phalapattosmī in 〔CSCD §733〕 and as addhā maggappattosmi phalappattosmī in 〔CSCD §734〕—the second word is phalapattosmī in the former and phalappattosmī in the latter, with a single consonant in one and a double in the other. The same sentence occurs twice with one form not identical. This section records the literal fact without judging whether it reflects a textual variant, a feature of the cleaned file, or the Commentator’s wording.

A second feature arising within this column In the list of the ten corruptions at 〔CSCD §732〕, the tenth is nikantī (long ī), while its explanation in 〔CSCD §734〕 is Nikantīti vipassanānikanti (the opening explanatory form has long ī, while the term being explained has short i). The fact is recorded without judgment.

One matter in the edition’s existing checked reading, tested in this column The existing checked reading for §C states that “the names and sequence of the ten corruptions of insight await verification.” A verbatim check against this base-text column finds the names and sequence in 〔CSCD §732〕 to be Obhāso, ñāṇaṃ, pīti, passaddhi, sukhaṃ, adhimokkho, paggaho, upaṭṭhānaṃ, upekkhā, nikantī, matching each of the ten items in the existing checked reading without difference. The order of the explanations in 〔CSCD §734〕 and the order of the Ancients’ stanza in 〔CSCD §735〕 are the same. The checked reading’s three parenthetical identifications—faith, energy, and mindfulness—are each the Commentator’s own explanation. The verified fact is recorded.

Boundary of this record Everything listed above is a literal fact of the base-text column; it has not been collated against the PTS scanned pages. Zero occurrences here concern this one surface only and do not warrant an inference about other editions.

IV. The Commentator’s Citations

Each place where the treatise cites another text is linked to a paragraph-number anchor. Only sources explicitly marked by the text itself are recorded, without deciding their identity. Parentheticals in the “Source Explicitly Marked by the Text” column are copied verbatim; their titles are not translated here.

LocationCitation Formula [Verbatim]Import of the CitationSource Explicitly Marked by the Text
〔CSCD §732〕Vuttañhetaṃ –''Kathaṃ dhammuddhaccaviggahitamānasaṃ hoti? Aniccato manasikaroto obhāso uppajjati, 'obhāso dhammo'ti obhāsaṃ āvajjati, tato vikkhepo uddhaccaṃ.Basis for the ten corruptions—the mind seized by agitation about phenomena(paṭi. ma. 2.6)
〔CSCD §734〕Yaṃ sandhāya vuttaṃ –''Suññāgāraṃ paviṭṭhassa, santacittassa bhikkhuno; Amānusī rati hoti, sammā dhammaṃ vipassato.Basis for superhuman delight(dha. pa. 373-374)
〔CSCD §735〕Obhāsādīsu ekekaṃ ''etaṃ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā''ti (the parenthetical is inserted between the quoted clause and samanupassati; the quotation ends before the parenthetical)Canonical statement of the three graspings(ma. ni. 1.241)
〔CSCD §735〕Tenāhu porāṇā –''Obhāse ceva ñāṇe ca, pītiyā ca vikampati;First stanza of the Ancients—being shaken in the ten bases(paṭi. ma. 2.7)
〔CSCD §736〕So evaṃ upaparikkhitvā obhāsaṃ ''netaṃ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā''ti (the parenthetical is inserted between the quoted clause and samanupassati)Canonical statement reversing the three graspings(ma. ni. 1.241)
〔CSCD §736〕Ñāṇaṃ…pe… nikantiṃ ''netaṃ mama, nesohamasmi, na meso attā''ti (the parenthetical is inserted between the quoted clause and samanupassati)Extension of the preceding statement(ma. ni. 1.241)
〔CSCD §736〕Tenāhu porāṇā –''Imāni dasa ṭhānāni, paññāyassa pariccitā; Dhammuddhaccakusalo hoti, na ca vikkhepaṃ gacchatī''ti.Second stanza of the Ancients—the skillful person is not distracted(paṭi. ma. 2.7)

Count of citation formulas [measured in this column] Vuttañhetaṃ occurs once, Tenāhu twice, Yaṃ sandhāya vuttaṃ once, and kira 7 timesthe most occurrences of kira (“it is said”) among this chapter’s seven units. They occur in the descriptions of the nine corruptions (six instances in the family Tassa kira) and at the opening of the account of the two elders (cittalapabbate kira). Yathāha, Vuttampi cetaṃ, and Tenāha all have zero occurrences. The text explicitly marks 7 parenthetical sources of 4 kinds, distributed as follows: Paṭisambhidāmagga 3 (paṭi. ma. 2.6 and two occurrences of paṭi. ma. 2.7), Majjhima Nikāya 3 (three occurrences of ma. ni. 1.241), and Dhammapada 1. The same statement from the Majjhima Nikāya occurs three times (the positive and negative forms of etaṃ mama, esohamasmi, eso me attā)—three links to the same source are a feature of this section’s citations. These figures apply only within this section, not to the whole work.

Symmetry of the two stanzas of the Ancients The stanza at 〔CSCD §735〕 says that the unskillful person is shaken in the ten bases, while the stanza at 〔CSCD §736〕 says that the skillful person does not become distracted. Both stanzas are linked to (paṭi. ma. 2.7) but stand in separate divisions of the section and have directly opposed meaningsverse testimony for the section’s division into “not the path” and “the path.”

The three accounts and their personal names The names in the three accounts of 〔CSCD §733〕 are verbatim: the two unnamed elders at cittalapabbate; uccavālikavāsī mahānāgatthero; haṃkanakavāsī mahādattatthero; cittalapabbate niṅkapeṇṇakapadhānagharavāsī cūḷasumanatthero; and talaṅgaravāsī dhammadinnatthero. All five are linked to their places of residence and none to a parenthetical source referencethe treatise substantiates the point through reported accounts, not scriptural citation. This apparatus records their names and locations verbatim without deciding their identity.

V. Similes and Rhetoric

This section records only where similes occur and the meanings with which they are paired; it offers no literary evaluation.

A. Similes The word-boundary form viya occurs 5 times; joined simile forms occur twice (two instances of vissaṭṭhaindavajiramiva); forms of sadisa occur once (pabbatarājasadisā); forms of upamā occur zero times; and a paired simile beginning with Yathā ca occurs once.

LocationSimileMeaning Paired with It
〔CSCD §733〕uccavālikavāsī mahānāgatthero viya haṃkanakavāsī mahādattatthero viya cittalapabbate niṅkapeṇṇakapadhānagharavāsī cūḷasumanatthero viya caLike the three elders taking themselves to be arahants—three instances of viya in sequence, with persons and events as their vehicle
〔CSCD §734〕vissaṭṭhaindavajiramiva avihatavegaṃ tikhiṇaṃ sūraṃ ativisadaṃ ñāṇaṃ uppajjatiLike Indra’s released thunderbolt—the sharpness of insight knowledge
〔CSCD §734〕dibbacakkhuno paraloko viya satiyā upaṭṭhātiLike the other world to one with the divine eye—the manifestation of mindfulness
〔CSCD §734〕nikhātā acalā pabbatarājasadisā satiImmovable like the king of mountains—a characteristic of mindfulness
〔CSCD §734〕vissaṭṭhaindavajiramiva pattapuṭe pakkhitta tattanārāco viya ca sūrā tikhiṇā hutvā vahatiLike a released thunderbolt and a red-hot iron arrow thrown into a leaf receptacle—the sharpness of equanimity in adverting

Distribution of the similes Four of the section’s five simile locations fall within the characteristics of the nine corruptions in 〔CSCD §734〕. The long paragraph on illumination in 〔CSCD §733〕 has only one location, the sequence of three elders, while 〔CSCD §735〕 and 〔CSCD §736〕 contain no similes at all. The illumination paragraph is long but sparse in similes because it substantiates its point through accounts rather than comparisons. This apparatus records the fact without evaluating it.

B. Verifiable rhetorical observations (1) The explanatory formula Kathaṃ? occurs twice, at the calculation of the thirty graspings in 〔CSCD §735〕 and the determination of the three truths in 〔CSCD §736〕. ? occurs 4 times in the whole section—one is within cited canonical text (Kathaṃ dhammuddhaccaviggahitamānasaṃ hoti?); Katame pana te dasa upakkilesāti? at 〔CSCD §732〕 is the Commentator’s own question, standing before Vuttañhetaṃ. (2) The narrative formula Tassa kira tasmiṃ samaye occurs 3 times, once each for rapture, tranquillity, and happiness; the paragraph on equanimity has Tasmiṃ hissa samayethe four descriptions begin with the same sentence pattern, giving rhythm to 〔CSCD §734〕. (3) Compounds prefixed with “insight” occur 16 times, in the following verbatim forms: vipassanāya (twice), vipassanupakkilesā, vipassanobhāso, vipassanāvīthi (twice), vipassanupakkileso, vipassanālābhino, vipassanāñāṇaṃ (twice), vipassanāpīti, vipassanāpassaddhi, vipassanāsukhaṃ, vipassanupekkhā, vipassanupekkhāpi, and vipassanānikantieach corruption is explained in the fixed form “a certain quality of insight.” (4) The sentence amaggameva ''maggo''ti aphalameva ca ''phala''nti gaṇhāti occurs verbatim twice, in 〔CSCD §733〕 and 〔CSCD §734〕—its repetition marks the common danger of all ten corruptions. (5) Indented verse lines: there are 10 four-space-indented lines (four lines from the Dhammapada stanza and six from the two stanzas of the Ancients), and 4 two-space-indented lines (the fixed chapter colophon). (6) The abbreviation …pe… occurs 3 times. (7) The extension formulas Yathā ca obhāse, evaṃ etesupi and Yathā ca obhāse, evaṃ sesesupi occur twicetheir latter halves are not identical, one using etesupi, the other sesesupi. All these figures were measured only within this section and do not apply to the whole work.

VI. Intratextual Cross-Reading

Every reference carries a paragraph-number anchor. Each target is established only through terms verifiable in this section; because the paragraph-number and chapter-section systems have no known mapping, no target is linked to a chapter section and none is inferred or converted. No source identification is decided here.

Place in This SectionTargetVerifiable Basis
〔CSCD §732〕 Athassa imāya taruṇavipassanāya āraddhavipassakassa dasa vipassanupakkilesā uppajjantiUnit on knowledge of arising and passing away 〔CSCD §731〕The preceding section establishes the two names tender insight knowledge and one who has initiated insight; this section’s opening sentence takes them up verbatim
〔CSCD §732〕 Vipassanupakkilesā hi paṭivedhappattassa ariyasāvakassa cevaUnit on knowledge of comprehension 〔CSCD §692〕That section establishes that knowledge of what is and is not the path arises because illumination and the rest arise in one who has initiated insight; the present section is its detailed exposition
〔CSCD §733〕 Bhagavato pana dasasahassilokadhātuṃ obhāsento udapādiUnits on the six recollectionsThe units on the Buddha’s qualities establish the extent of the Blessed One’s illumination; this section contrasts it with the extent of a practitioner’s
〔CSCD §734〕 khuddakāpīti, khaṇikāpīti, okkantikāpīti, ubbegāpīti, pharaṇāpītīti ayaṃ pañcavidhā pītiUnits on the earth kasiṇaThe five kinds of rapture are established there; this section takes their names without explaining them again
〔CSCD §736〕Unit on comprehension of the immaterial by the sevenfold method 〔CSCD §721〕The treatise itself states that this paragraph should be developed in detail according to that section’s three hypothetical formulas (sabbaṃ arūpasattake vuttanayena vitthāretabbaṃ)
〔CSCD §736〕 Diṭṭhivisuddhiyaṃ tāva nāmarūpassa vavatthāpanena dukkhasaccassa vavatthānaṃ kataṃChapter on purification of viewThat chapter establishes the truth of suffering through determining name-and-form
〔CSCD §736〕 Kaṅkhāvitaraṇavisuddhiyaṃ paccayapariggahaṇena samudayasaccassa vavatthānaṃChapter on purification by overcoming doubtThat chapter establishes the truth of origin through apprehending conditions

VII. Transmission

This edition does not advance a position in the apparatus on questions of authorship, textual transmission, or the lineage of the commentaries.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing — with AI-assisted rendering, translator-ruled

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0