摩訶止觀 攝法

〔T46 0029c02〕
心要Essence

佛法的名字那麼多:理、惑、智、行、位、教,還有無數三昧、道品與經典。只說『止觀』,會不會太少?

智者先給兩個譬喻。止像灸病得穴,穴位一準,眾患都能消除;觀像得到珠王,一珠在手,眾寶都隨之而來。關鍵不在名字有多少,而在是否找到能使心寂、使理明的根本。

於是,一條完整的路顯出來:理性本來常住;因迷理而起惑;順理而有智;理解落實為行;由行而證位;位滿又轉身教人。從理到惑,從惑到智,從智到行,再到位與教,沒有一步離開止觀。

但攝法不只是把六項排成一列。最後,本論說一理能攝其餘五法,一惑、一智、一行、一位、一教,也各自攝盡全體。因為理若完全不關乎迷悟,它只是空名;智慧若不能轉成行,也到不了任何地方;位若不能化他,證得便停在自己。

所以,止觀不是一隻把萬法塞進去的箱子。它更像每一法中的寂與照:惑要被照見,也要止息;行要有觀照的眼,也要有安定的足;說位而不執位,說空而不壞因果;教從心開出,又回來照心。

名可以很少,路不能少走一步。真正的攝法,不是記住『一切都在止觀裡』,而是在眼前這一法中問:我是否看清了它?又是否真正停下了使它繼續流轉的那顆心?

The Buddha-Dharma has so many names: principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching, along with countless samādhis, factors of the path, and scriptures. Can it really be enough to say only “calming-and-contemplation”?

Zhiyi first gives two similes. Calming is like cauterizing an illness and finding the point: once the point is accurate, every ailment can be removed. Contemplation is like obtaining the jewel king: with this one jewel in hand, all treasures follow. The key is not how many names there are, but whether one has found the root that makes mind quiescent and principle clear.

A complete road then appears. The nature of principle constantly abides. Confusion about principle gives rise to delusion; accord with principle gives rise to wisdom; understanding is implemented as practice; practice realizes stations; and, when stations are fulfilled, one turns to teach others. From principle to delusion, from delusion to wisdom, from wisdom to practice, and onward to stations and teaching, not one step leaves calming-and-contemplation.

Yet embracing the Dharmas is not merely arranging six items in a row. At the end, the treatise says that one principle can embrace the other five Dharmas, and that one delusion, one wisdom, one practice, one station, and one teaching each likewise embraces the whole. For if principle had nothing to do with confusion and awakening, it would be an empty name. If wisdom could not become practice, it would never arrive anywhere. If a station could not transform others, realization would stop with oneself.

Calming-and-contemplation is therefore not a box into which all Dharmas are stuffed. It is more like the quiescence and illumination within every Dharma. Delusion must be illuminated and must also cease. Practice needs the eyes of contemplation and the steady feet of calming. One speaks of stations without grasping them, and of emptiness without destroying cause and result. Teaching unfolds from mind and returns to illuminate mind.

Names can be few, but no step on the road can be omitted. Truly embracing the Dharmas does not mean memorizing that “everything is in calming-and-contemplation.” It means asking within this very Dharma before me: have I seen it clearly, and have I actually brought to rest the mind that keeps it turning?

原典Canonical · verbatim

隋天台智者大師說・門人灌頂記《摩訶止觀》· 大正藏 T46n1911〔起 T46 0029c02〕。段/行首〔T46 …〕=大正藏頁·欄·行錨(換頁一枚)。

〔T46 0029c02〕第四、明攝法者,疑者謂:「止觀名略,攝法不周。」今則不然。止觀總持,遍收諸法。何者?止能寂諸法,如灸病得穴,眾患皆除;觀能照理,如得珠王,眾寶皆獲,具足一切佛法。《大品》有百二十條及一切法,皆言當學般若。般若秖是觀智,觀智已攝一切法。又止是王三昧,一切三昧悉入其中。 今更廣論攝法,即為六意:一、攝一切理,二、攝一切惑,三、攝一切智,四、攝一切行,五、攝一切位,六、攝一切教。此六次第者,有佛無佛,理性常住;由迷理故,起生死惑;順理而觀,是故論智;解故立行;由行故證位;位滿故教他。事理、解行、因果、自他等次第,皆止觀攝盡也。 ○一、以三止三觀攝一切理者,理是諦法,如上開合,偏圓不同;權實之外,更無別理。除摩黎山,餘無栴檀;若更有者,即是妄語。既以止觀顯體,即攝一切理也。 ○二、止觀攝一切惑者,以迷諦故,起生死惑。迷,即無明。若迷權理,則有界內相應、獨頭等無明。與見思諸使合者,名「相應」;不相應者名「獨頭」。是事不知,故起貪。不知者是「無明」;起貪是「行」;貪者是「識」;識共四陰起是「名色」;色動諸根是「六入」;六入所著是「觸」;觸隨順塵是「受」;受所喜樂是「愛」;愛俱生纏是「取」;造當來生業是「有」;未來陰起是「生」;陰熟是「老」;捨陰是「死」。是十二輪更互為因果:煩惱通業;業通苦;苦通煩惱,故名「三道」。 《成論》云:「前行後三中,後行前七中。七是業,復是道,能通後世;後三非業,而能通七,亦得是道。」經中亦呼為「十二牽連」、「十二輪」。束縛不窮,故名為「輪」;三世間隔,故名「分段」。覆真諦理,不得解脫,此即是病。說病即知藥,藥即從假入空止觀。觀藥即知病,故此惑為入空止觀所攝也。 〔T46 0030a06〕若迷實理,則有界外相應、獨頭等無明。所以者何?界內雖斷相應、獨頭,而習氣猶在。小乘中,習非正使;大乘實說,習即別惑,是界外無明也。故《寶性論》云:「二乘之人,雖有無常、苦、空、無我等對治,於佛法身猶是顛倒。」顛倒即是「無明」獨頭;無漏智業為「行」;三種意生身,亦是五種意生身——意即是「識」;身即「名色」、「六入」、「觸」、「受」;無明細惑、戲論未究竟滅,即是「愛」、「取」;煩惱染、業染、生染未究竟,即是「有」;三種意因移,即是「生」;其果變易,即是「老死」。 束此十二,是無漏界中四種障,謂:緣、相、生、壞。緣即煩惱道;相即業道;生、壞即苦道。故知界外有十二因緣。所以者何?降佛已下,皆有無明;無明潤業;業既被潤,那得無苦?此十二輪雖不退界墮下,不妨從無明輪至老死,從老死輪至無明。障於實理,良由此惑。此惑為「入假」、「入中」兩觀所治。 更料簡之。何以故?三種意生身,凡有多種。 若析、體二乘及通菩薩等,先斷界內惑盡,而未曾修習假、中者,生於界外,界外惑全未被伏,其根則鈍。若於彼習觀時,必須次第歷劫修行,學恒沙佛法,先破塵沙。塵沙雖不潤生,能障化道,故須前斷。斷此惑者,止是調心方便,伏界外惑;進斷三道,相應、獨頭,枝本皆去。故知假觀正攝得塵沙,亦攝得無明。 若別圓二人,通惑先盡,別惑被伏,生彼界者神根即利;但修中觀,治彼三道。從於初地乃至後地,地地中皆有三道。地地無明分分滅,業滅、苦滅。地地相應去時,獨頭亦去。地地雖有智,智與無明雜;雜故,亦得呼為智障,障上分智故。唯佛心中無無明,則煩惱道盡;煩惱道盡,故業盡;業盡,故苦盡。三道究竟,唯在如來。是故中觀攝得界外惑也。 ○三、止觀攝一切智者,諸智離合,如前所說;三觀往收,無不畢盡。世智不照理,十一智中已攝。若廣明二十智者,亦為三觀所攝也。 ○四、止觀攝一切行者,前智是解,解而無行,終無所至。行有兩種,所謂慧行、行行。若三藏中慧行、行行,乃至圓中慧行、行行。慧行是正行,行行是助行。 毘婆舍那能破煩惱,復須奢摩他力助正知見。正、助兩行隨智而轉,如足隨眼。若三藏中,無常、析觀是慧行;不淨、慈心等是行行。此兩行隨析智入空也。若通中,體法如幻化,是慧行;歷一切法數息、念處、緣事止觀,是行行。此兩行隨體法智入空也。若為化眾生,修道種智,緣俗理,屬慧行;緣俗事者,屬行行。此兩行隨道種智入假也。若中道緣於實相,一道清淨,是慧行;歷一切法門諸度皆是摩訶衍,十二因緣即是佛性,念處即是坐道場等,是行行。此兩行隨中智入實相也。 復次,根本四禪,定慧等故,兩攝。欲界,定少慧多,觀攝。中間亦爾。四空,定多慧少,止攝。四無量心:前三心,觀攝;捨心,止攝。九想、八念、十想,觀攝。八背捨:前三背捨,觀攝;後五,止攝。九次第定、師子奮迅、超越等,是止攝。 四念處是慧性,觀攝。若作四意止說者,作心記錄不淨等,此屬止攝;而終是觀為主。四正勤,為成念處,一往觀攝。若兩惡不生,止攝;兩善為生,觀攝。四如意足,從四因緣得定,即果為名,止攝。五根:信、進、慧三根,觀攝;念、定,止攝。又,信、念兩屬。五力亦如是。七覺分:擇法、喜、進等,觀攝;除捨、定,止攝;念,通兩處。八正:正見、正思惟,觀攝;正業、正語、正命,屬戒,即止攝;正念、正定、正精進,止攝。四諦:三諦是有為行,屬觀門;滅諦是無為行,屬止門。十六行,皆是觀門。 四弘誓,依四諦起,如彼。十八不共法:三業,隨智慧行,觀攝;三無失,止攝;知三世,觀攝;餘可知。四無畏者:一切智無畏,屬觀攝;漏盡,止攝;至處道,觀攝;障道,止攝。三三昧門,止攝。三解脫門,觀攝。六度者:前三是功德,止攝;後三是智慧,觀攝。又,五度功德,止攝;般若,觀攝。又,六度皆是功德莊嚴,止攝。 乃至九種大禪、百八三昧,皆屬止攝。十八空、十喻、五百陀羅尼,皆觀攝。如是等一切慧行、行行,無不為止觀所攝。當知止觀名略,攝義則廣。 ○五、攝一切位者,若云:「一地即二地,二地即三地,寂滅真如,有何次位?」此則無有次位。又大乘經中處處皆說一切地位。良以無生、無滅,正慧無所得,能治煩惱、業、苦。三道若淨,於無為法中而有差別,次位何嫌? 若析法入空,有無二門所斷三道,如《毘曇》所明七賢、七聖、四沙門果;《成論》所明二十七賢聖等,差別位相;乃至非有、非無門位,皆為析空觀攝。 〔T46 0031a02〕若體法四門入空所斷三道,如《大品》明三乘共位,乾慧乃至八地悉同入空止觀攝。 若從空入假,修歷別行,不得意者,成三十心伏惑之位,即用空假兩觀攝。若得意,能破三道,成十地位,即第三觀攝。或純用假觀攝,乃至四門亦如是。 若圓信、解、行,即事而真;從觀行入相似,進破無明,開、示、悟、入佛之知見;凡四十二位,同乘寶乘,直至道場。《涅槃》說十五日,月光用轉顯,譬其智德;十六日,月光用漸減,譬其斷德。亦如十四般若,是因位;十五如妙覺,是果位。皆用中觀攝。乃至四門亦如是。 問:大乘不明地位,止觀何所攝耶? 答:大乘經論皆明地、位,汝畏地位,入無地位,不免無縛。文字性離,即是解脫。雖說地位,即無地位。《中論》云:「如外人破世間因果,則無今世、後世;破出世因果,則無三寶、四諦、四沙門果。」無何等三寶?見既不滅,則無三藏中三寶、四諦、四沙門果。尚不得拙度道果,何處有後三番三寶、四諦、四沙門果?此斥外道全無四番三寶等也。若斥拙度者,但有三藏中三寶、四諦、四沙門果,無後三番道果也。 如我所破者,即有三寶、四諦、四沙門果。何者?析破界內煩惱、業、苦,即有三藏三寶、四諦、四沙門果;若體破者,即有三番三寶、四諦、四沙門果。點此一語,治內之留滯,破外以閑邪,去二邊之邪小,正三寶四諦則立,云何言無邪?但有位、無位,非證不了。今但信教,教有,則階位宛然;教無,則豁同空淨。無句義是菩薩句義,點空論位,位不可得,不應生諍也。 又約《中論》偈四句,亦得有地位義。偈云:「因緣所生法,我說即是空」者,即破煩惱、業、苦,便有須陀洹若智若斷,是菩薩無生法忍。六地齊二乘,七地為方便,十地為如佛,此位自明,云何言無?偈「亦名為假名」者,是漸次破界外三道,即有四十二賢聖位,云何言無?偈「亦名中道義」,即是圓破五住,便有六即之位,云何言無?秖用四句攝一切位;一切位不出四句,四句不出止觀,故言「攝位」也。 ○六、攝一切教者,《毘婆沙》云:「心能為一切法作名字;若無心則無一切名字。」當知世、出世名字悉從心起。若觀心僻越,順無明流,則有一切諸惡教起。所謂《僧佉》、《衛世》,九十五種邪見教生。亦有諸善教起:五行六甲、陰陽八卦、五經子史。世智無道名教,皆從心起。 云何出世名教皆從心起?堅意《寶性論》云:「有一大經卷,如三千大千世界大,記大千世界事。如中、如小,四天下、三界等大者,皆記其事在一微塵中。一塵既然,一切塵亦爾。一人出世,以淨天眼見此大經卷,而作是念:『云何大經在微塵內,而不饒益一切眾生?』即以方便,破出此經,以益於他。」如來無礙智慧經卷,具在眾生身中;顛倒覆之,不信、不見。佛教眾生修八聖道,破一切虛妄,見己智慧與如來等。此約微塵,附有為喻。 又約空為喻者,《發菩提心論》云:「譬如有人見佛法滅,以如來十二部經仰書虛空,宛然具足;一切眾生,無有知者。久久之後,更有一人遊行於空,見經嗟咄:『云何眾生不知不見?』即便寫取,示導眾生。」云何寫經?謂令眾生修八正道,破虛妄等。 修有多種,若觀心因緣生滅無常,修八正道者,即寫三藏之經。若觀心因緣即空,修八聖道,即寫通教之經。若觀心分別校計有無量種,凡夫二乘所不能測,法眼菩薩乃能見之,是修無量八正道,即寫別教之經。若觀心即是佛性,圓修八正道,即寫中道之經。明一切法悉出心中;心即大乘,心即佛性;自見己智慧與如來等。 又觀心即假、即中者,即攝《華嚴》之經;若觀心因緣生法生滅者,即攝三藏《四阿含》教,如乳之經;若觀心即空者,即攝共般若,如酪之經;若具觀心因緣生法,即空、即假、即中者,即攝《方等》,生酥之經;若但用即空、即假、即中者,即攝《大品》,熟酥之經;若用即中觀心者,即攝《法華》,開佛知見大事,正直醍醐之經;若用四句相即觀心,即有《涅槃》,同見佛性,醍醐之經。 又若觀因緣,又觀因緣即是佛性,佛性即是如來,是名乳中殺人;若觀析空,又觀析空即是佛性,佛性即是如來,是名酪中殺人;若觀即空,又觀即空即是佛性,是名生酥殺人;若觀假名,又觀假名即是佛性,是為熟酥殺人;若觀即中,又觀即中即是佛性,是名醍醐殺人。今通言殺人者,即二死已斷,三道清淨,名為殺人,是為止觀攝不定教。 略攝如上。廣攝者,絓一切經教,悉用止觀攝之,無不畢盡也。 復次,心攝諸教,略有兩意:一者一切眾生心中具足一切法門;如來明審,照其心法,按彼心說,無量教法從心而出。二者如來往昔曾作漸頓觀心,偏圓具足;依此心觀為眾生說,教化弟子令學如來破塵出卷,仰寫空經。故有一切經教,悉為三止三觀所攝也。 〔T46 0032a06〕○上六意攝法,次第可解。今直以一法攝一切法者:「一理」攝一切理、一切惑、一切智、一切行、一切位、一切教也。又「一惑」攝一切理、智、行、位、教也。又「一智」攝一切理、惑、行、位、教也。又「一行」攝一切理、惑、智、位、教也。又「一位」攝一切理、惑、智、行、教也。又「一教」攝一切理、惑、智、行、位也。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

止觀二名,為何能攝盡一切法

第四章說明攝法。有人懷疑:『止』與『觀』這兩個名稱太簡略,恐怕不能周遍收攝一切法。現在要說明,事實並非如此。止觀具有總攝的作用,能遍收一切法。

為什麼?止能使諸法寂靜,好像灸病時找準穴位,一切病患便都消除;觀能照見真理,好像得到寶珠之王,一切珍寶便都獲得,因而具足一切佛法。《大品》列有一百二十條及一切法,都說應當學般若。般若就是觀智;觀智既已收攝一切法,觀便無所不攝。止又是王三昧,一切三昧都收入其中。

現在再廣說止觀如何攝法,共有六意:第一,攝一切理;第二,攝一切惑;第三,攝一切智;第四,攝一切行;第五,攝一切位;第六,攝一切教。

這六項為什麼依此次第排列?無論有佛出世或沒有佛出世,真理的本性都常住不變。眾生因為迷失真理,所以生起生死之惑;順著真理觀察,所以接著論說智慧;有了解,才建立修行;由修行,所以證得位次;位次圓滿之後,便教化他人。事與理、理解與修行、因與果、自己與他人等前後次第,全都由止觀攝盡。

一、攝一切理

以三止、三觀攝一切理。理就是諦法,如前文所說,可以有不同的開合方式,也有偏、圓之別;但總不出權、實二理。權、實之外,再沒有另一種理。譬如除了摩黎山,其他地方沒有栴檀;若說權實之外另有一理,便是妄語。既然以止觀顯出真實之體,止觀也就攝盡一切理。

二、攝一切惑

止觀又攝一切惑。眾生因為迷於諦理,所以生起流轉生死的惑;所謂迷,就是無明。

迷於權理的界內惑

若迷於權理,便有三界內的相應無明、獨頭無明等。無明與見惑、思惑各種使相合,叫作『相應』;不與它們相應,叫作『獨頭』。

因為不明白眼前的事,所以生起貪著。不明白就是『無明』;貪念發動就是『行』;起貪的心就是『識』;識與其餘受、想、行及色一同生起,就是『名色』;色身使諸根發動,就是『六入』;六入攀著境界,就是『觸』;觸順著所緣境,就是『受』;對所受境生起喜樂,就是『愛』;愛與由愛俱生的纏縛,就是『取』;造作未來受生的業,就是『有』;未來五陰生起,就是『生』;五陰成熟,就是『老』;捨離五陰,就是『死』。

這十二支如輪轉動,展轉互為因果:煩惱通向業,業通向苦,苦又通向煩惱,所以合稱『三道』。

《成論》的話說:意的作用先發動於後列三業之中,身、口的造作後發動於前列七業之中。前七項既是業,也是能通向後世之道;後三不是業,卻能通向前七,因此也可稱為道。

經中又把十二支叫作『十二牽連』與『十二輪』。它們束縛不盡,所以叫輪;過去、現在、未來三世的受生彼此間隔,所以叫分段生死。這些惑覆蔽真諦,使眾生不能解脫,這就是病。說明病,便可知道對治的藥;藥就是從假入空的止觀。觀察對治之藥,也能反過來認識所治之病。因此,這一類惑由入空止觀所攝。

迷於實理的界外惑

若迷於實理,便有三界外的相應無明、獨頭無明等。為什麼?三界內的相應無明與獨頭無明雖已斷除,習氣仍然存在。小乘法中不把習氣列為正使;大乘依真實義說,習氣就是另一類惑,也就是界外無明。

所以《寶性論》說,二乘之人雖已修無常、苦、空、無我等對治,對佛的法身仍屬顛倒。這種顛倒就配作『無明』,而屬獨頭無明;無漏智慧所起的業就是『行』;三種意生身也可依開合說成五種意生身,其中意就是『識』,身就是『名色』『六入』『觸』『受』;無明細惑與戲論尚未究竟滅盡,就是『愛』『取』;煩惱染、業染、生染尚未究竟滅盡,就是『有』;三種意生身之因移轉,就是『生』;它的果報變易,就是『老死』。

把這十二支收束起來,就是無漏界中的四種障:緣、相、生、壞。緣屬煩惱道,相屬業道,生與壞屬苦道。因此可以知道,三界之外也有十二因緣。

為什麼?從佛以下的一切位都還有無明;無明滋潤業,業既被滋潤,怎會沒有苦?這十二支雖不會退回三界之內、墮到下界,仍不妨從無明輪轉到老死,再從老死輪轉到無明。障礙實理的,正是這種惑;它由入假、入中兩種觀所對治。

意生身的利鈍料簡

再進一步分別。為什麼?三種意生身本有多種情形。

若是以析法、體法入空的二乘人,以及通教菩薩等,他們先把三界內惑斷盡,卻從未修習假觀與中觀;生到界外以後,界外之惑完全沒有被伏,根性便鈍。他們在界外修觀時,必須依次經歷多劫修行,學習如恒河沙數的佛法,先破塵沙惑。塵沙惑雖不直接滋潤受生,卻會障礙教化眾生之道,所以須先斷除。斷塵沙惑,只是調伏自心的方便,能伏界外惑;再進一步斷除界外三道,相應與獨頭無明、枝末與根本也都去除。因此,假觀正面攝得塵沙惑,也連帶攝得無明。

若是別教、圓教兩類人,三界內的通惑先已斷盡,界外別惑也已被伏;生到界外時,根性便敏利。他們只修中觀,對治界外三道。從初地到後地,每一地都有三道;每一地都分分滅除無明,業隨之滅,苦也隨之滅。每一地的相應無明去除時,獨頭無明也去除。

各地雖已有智慧,智慧仍與未盡的無明夾雜;因為夾雜,也可稱為智障,因它障礙更上一分智慧。只有佛心中全無無明,煩惱道才究竟盡;煩惱道盡,所以業盡;業盡,所以苦盡。三道究竟滅盡,只在如來。因此,中觀能攝治界外之惑。

三、攝一切智

止觀又攝一切智慧。各種智慧如何分合,前文已經說過;用三觀往回收攝,沒有一種不能攝盡。世間智慧不能照見真理,已收入十一智之中;若廣說二十智,也同樣由三觀所攝。

四、攝一切行

止觀又攝一切修行。前一項智慧屬於理解;只有理解而沒有實行,終究不能到達目的。行有兩種,就是慧行與行行。從三藏教的慧行、行行,一直到圓教的慧行、行行,都不出這兩類。慧行是正行,行行是助行。

毘婆舍那能破煩惱,還須奢摩他的力量協助正知見。正行、助行兩者隨智慧運轉,好像雙腳跟隨眼睛前進。

在三藏教中,觀無常、析法入空是慧行;不淨觀、慈心觀等是行行。這兩類行隨析法之智入空。

在通教中,體達諸法如幻如化是慧行;歷緣一切法而修數息、念處,以及緣事止觀,是行行。這兩類行隨體法之智入空。

若為教化眾生而修道種智,緣俗諦之理屬慧行,緣世俗差別事相屬行行。這兩類行隨道種智入假。

若依中道緣於實相,一道清淨,是慧行;歷一切法門,知道諸度全是大乘,十二因緣就是佛性,念處就是坐道場等,是行行。這兩類行隨中道之智入實相。

再從各種行門分別收攝:

  • 根本四禪中,定、慧均等,所以止、觀兩邊都攝。欲界定少慧多,屬觀攝;中間禪也是如此。四空定多慧少,屬止攝。
  • 四無量心中,前三心屬觀攝,捨心屬止攝。九想、八念、十想都屬觀攝。
  • 八背捨中,前三背捨屬觀攝,後五屬止攝。九次第定、師子奮迅三昧、超越三昧等,都屬止攝。
  • 四念處以慧為體性,屬觀攝。若依四意止的說法,使心記持不淨等觀法,這一止心作用屬止攝,但終究仍以觀為主。
  • 四正勤為成就四念處,大體屬觀攝;細分而言,使兩種惡法不生,屬止攝;使兩種善法生起,屬觀攝。
  • 四如意足由四種因緣得定,從所得之果立名,所以屬止攝。
  • 五根中,信根、精進根、慧根屬觀攝,念根、定根屬止攝;另就一義,信、念兩根又可通屬止、觀。五力也同樣如此。
  • 七覺分中,擇法、喜、進等屬觀攝,除捨與定之外;捨、定屬止攝,念則通於兩邊。
  • 八正中,正見、正思惟屬觀攝;正業、正語、正命屬戒,所以屬止攝;正念、正定、正精進也屬止攝。
  • 四諦中,苦、集、道三諦是有為之行,屬觀門;滅諦是無為之行,屬止門。十六行全屬觀門。
  • 四弘誓依四諦生起,配屬也依前義。
  • 十八不共法中,三業隨智慧而行,屬觀攝;三種無失屬止攝;知三世屬觀攝;其餘可依其義類推。
  • 四無畏中,一切智無畏屬觀攝,漏盡屬止攝,至處道屬觀攝,障道屬止攝。
  • 三三昧門屬止攝,三解脫門屬觀攝。
  • 六度可以有三種收法:前三度是功德,屬止攝,後三度是智慧,屬觀攝;也可說前五度都屬功德莊嚴而由止攝,般若一度由觀攝;還可總說六度全是功德莊嚴,都由止攝。

乃至九種大禪、一百零八三昧,全屬止攝;十八空、十喻、五百陀羅尼,全屬觀攝。像這樣,一切慧行、行行,沒有一種不由止觀所攝。應當知道,止觀名稱雖簡略,所攝的意義卻廣大。

五、攝一切位

止觀又攝一切位次。

若有人說:『一地就是二地,二地就是三地;寂滅真如之中,哪裡還有次位?』從這一面看,確實沒有次位。但大乘經中處處又都宣說一切地位。因為諸法無生無滅,正慧無所得,卻能對治煩惱、業、苦;三道淨除既有深淺,在無為法中便有差別,建立次位有何妨礙?

若依析法入空,有、無等四門所斷的三道,《毘曇》說七賢、七聖、四沙門果,《成論》說二十七賢聖等差別位相;乃至非有、非無門中的位次,全由析空觀所攝。

若依體法四門入空而斷三道,如《大品》所說三乘共位,從乾慧地一直到八地,都由同一入空止觀所攝。

若從空入假,修歷別之行而沒有得其深意,便成三十心伏惑之位,由空、假兩觀收攝;若已得其意,能破三道,成就十地位,便由第三中觀收攝。也可單純從假觀說其所攝,乃至依四門分說也都如此。

若依圓教而信、解、行,當下事相就是真理;由觀行位進入相似位,再進而破無明,開、示、悟、入佛的知見。四十二位共同乘坐寶乘,直至道場。《涅槃》說十五日月光之用轉而顯著,譬喻智德;十六日月光之用逐漸減少,譬喻斷德。也可說十四般若是因位,第十五如妙覺是果位。這些都由中觀收攝,乃至依四門分說也同樣如此。

有位與無位的問答

問:大乘不說地位,止觀還能攝什麼位?

答:大乘經論都明說地與位。你因畏懼地位而進入所謂無地位,仍不能免除對『無縛』的執著。文字的本性遠離,當體就是解脫;雖然說地位,地位仍無自性。

《中論》的意思是:若像反對空義的人所難那樣,破壞世間因果,便沒有今世、後世;破壞出世間因果,便沒有三寶、四諦、四沙門果。究竟沒有哪一類三寶?若見惑尚未滅,三藏教中的三寶、四諦、四沙門果便無從建立,更不用說後面通、別、圓三種三寶、四諦、四沙門果。這是斥責外道連四種三寶等都全盤否定。

若只斥責拙度之法,便只是保留三藏教的三寶、四諦、四沙門果,而沒有後三教的道果。

至於《中論》自身所破之後,三寶、四諦、四沙門果仍然成立。以析法破除界內煩惱、業、苦,就有三藏教的三寶、四諦、四沙門果;若用體法空破惑,就有後三教的三寶、四諦、四沙門果。提點這一要語,既能治學佛人內在的滯礙,又能破外道而防止邪見;去除偏於二邊的邪見與小乘留滯,三寶、四諦便能正立,怎能說一概全無?

至於有位、無位,若非親證便不能究竟了知。現在只依佛教所說而信受:教中說有,階位就分明宛然;教中說無,便豁然同於空寂清淨。無句義就是菩薩句義;在空義中提點位次,位本不可得,所以不應因此爭論。

再依《中論》偈的四句,也可顯出地位義。

『因緣所生法,我說即是空』這一句,表示破除煩惱、業、苦;由此便有須陀洹的智慧與斷惑,也有菩薩無生法忍。六地與二乘齊,七地修方便,十地如佛,位次自然分明,怎能說沒有?

『也叫作假名』這一句,表示次第破除界外三道,因此有四十二賢聖位,怎能說沒有?

『也叫作中道義』這一句,表示圓滿破除五住煩惱,因此有六即之位,怎能說沒有?

只用這四句,便能攝一切位;一切位不出四句,四句又不出止觀,所以叫作攝位。

六、攝一切教

止觀又攝一切教。《毘婆沙》說,心能替一切法安立名字;若沒有心,也就沒有一切名字。由此應知,世間與出世間的一切名教,全都從心生起。

若觀心偏邪、越離正理,順著無明之流,便生起一切惡教,例如僧佉、衛世等九十五種邪見之教。由心也會生起各種世間善教,例如五行六甲、陰陽八卦、五經與諸子史書。這些都是世間智慧所立、不能通達出世之道的名教,也全從心起。

出世教如何從心生起

出世間名教為何也都從心生起?堅意《寶性論》說,譬如有一部極大的經卷,大小如三千大千世界,其中記載整個大千世界的事;中千、小千、四天下、三界等不同大小的經卷,也都記錄其事,藏在一粒微塵中。一塵如此,一切微塵也都如此。

後來有一人出世,以清淨天眼看見微塵內的大經卷,便想:『為什麼這麼大的經卷藏在微塵裡,不能利益一切眾生?』於是運用方便,破開微塵,取出經卷,用來利益他人。

如來無礙智慧的經卷,完整具足地存在眾生身中,只因顛倒覆蔽,眾生不能相信、不能看見。佛教眾生修八聖道,破除一切虛妄,使眾生看見自己的智慧與如來平等。這是依微塵而說、附著有為事相建立的譬喻。

又有依空而說的譬喻。《發菩提心論》說,譬如有人看見佛法將滅,把如來十二部經仰寫在虛空中,字句宛然具足,一切眾生卻都不知道。經過很久,又有一人在空中遊行,看見經文,感歎說:『為什麼眾生不知道、看不見?』他便把經文書寫下來,展示並引導眾生。

怎樣才叫書寫經文?就是使眾生修八正道,破除虛妄等。

修法有多種。若觀心因緣生滅無常,依此修八正道,就是寫出三藏教的經;若觀心的因緣生法當體即空,依此修八聖道,就是寫出通教的經;若觀心分別計度的法有無量種,凡夫與二乘不能測知,只有具法眼的菩薩能見,依此修無量八正道,就是寫出別教的經;若觀心當體就是佛性,圓滿修習八正道,就是寫出中道之經。這便顯明一切法全從心中生出;心就是大乘,心就是佛性,行者親自看見自己的智慧與如來平等。

再依觀心判攝諸教。觀心當體即假、即中,便攝《華嚴》之經。觀心的因緣生法有生有滅,便攝三藏《四阿含》教,如同乳味。觀心當體即空,便攝共般若,如同酪味。完整觀心的因緣生法當體即空、即假、即中,便攝《方等》教,如同生酥。只運用即空、即假、即中三觀,便攝《大品》,如同熟酥。只用即中觀觀心,便攝《法華》,開佛知見大事,是正直的醍醐之經。用四句相即來觀心,便有《涅槃》,同見佛性,也是醍醐之經。

又依乳、酪、生酥、熟酥、醍醐五層譬喻說不定教。若觀因緣,又觀因緣就是佛性、佛性就是如來,叫作乳中殺人;若觀析法空,又觀析空就是佛性、佛性就是如來,叫作酪中殺人;若觀當體即空,又觀即空就是佛性,叫作生酥殺人;若觀假名,又觀假名就是佛性,叫作熟酥殺人;若觀即中,又觀即中就是佛性,叫作醍醐殺人。

這裡通說『殺人』,是指兩種生死已斷,煩惱、業、苦三道已經清淨。這就是止觀攝不定教。

以上只是略說如何攝教。若要廣說,凡是一切經教,全都可以用止觀收攝,沒有不能攝盡的。

心攝諸教,又略有兩層意思。第一,一切眾生心中具足一切法門;如來明白審察,照見眾生心中的法,依照他的心而說法,因此無量教法從心而出。第二,如來過去曾修漸、頓觀心,偏、圓具足;如來依這些心觀為眾生說法,教導弟子學如來破開微塵、取出經卷,也學著仰寫空中經文。因此,一切經教全由三止三觀所攝。

一法又能攝一切法

以上六意依次攝法,次第容易理解。現在再直接說明:六法中的任何一法,都能攝一切法。

第一,一理不只攝一切理,也攝一切惑、一切智、一切行、一切位、一切教。

第二,一惑不只攝一切惑,也攝一切理、一切智、一切行、一切位、一切教。

第三,一智不只攝一切智,也攝一切理、一切惑、一切行、一切位、一切教。

第四,一行不只攝一切行,也攝一切理、一切惑、一切智、一切位、一切教。

第五,一位不只攝一切位,也攝一切理、一切惑、一切智、一切行、一切教。

第六,一教不只攝一切教,也攝一切理、一切惑、一切智、一切行、一切位。

所以,止觀的名稱雖然只有兩個字,理、惑、智、行、位、教以及每一法的全體開合,沒有一項在止觀之外。

How Can the Two Names Calming and Contemplation Embrace All Dharmas?

The fourth chapter explains Embracing the Dharmas. Someone doubts that the two names “calming” and “contemplation” are too concise and perhaps cannot gather all Dharmas comprehensively. What follows shows that this is not so. Calming-and-contemplation has the function of total inclusion and can universally gather every Dharma.

Why? Calming can make all Dharmas quiescent, just as finding the right point when cauterizing an illness removes every ailment. Contemplation can illuminate truth, just as obtaining the king of jewels brings every treasure with it; all Buddha-Dharmas are thereby complete. The Great Perfection of Wisdom lists 120 items and all Dharmas, and in every case says that prajñā should be studied. Prajñā is contemplative wisdom. Since contemplative wisdom embraces all Dharmas, nothing is outside contemplation. Calming, moreover, is the king samādhi into which all samādhis enter.

The comprehensive embrace of Dharmas by calming-and-contemplation is now explained broadly through six intents: first, embracing all principle; second, embracing all delusion; third, embracing all wisdom; fourth, embracing all practice; fifth, embracing all stations; and sixth, embracing all teaching.

Why are these six arranged in this order? Whether a Buddha appears in the world or does not appear, the nature of principle constantly abides unchanged. Because sentient beings lose sight of principle, the delusions of cyclic birth and death arise. Because they contemplate in accord with principle, wisdom is discussed next. With understanding, practice is established. Through practice, stations are realized. Once stations are fulfilled, one teaches and transforms others. Phenomena and principle, understanding and practice, cause and result, self and others, and every other preceding and following sequence are all embraced by calming-and-contemplation.

1. Embracing All Principle

The three calmings and three contemplations embrace all principle. Principle is the Dharma of truths. As explained earlier, it may be opened and gathered in different ways and distinguished as partial or perfect, but in summary it does not exceed the two principles provisional and real. Beyond provisional and real there is no other principle. Just as there is no sandalwood anywhere apart from Mount Moli, to say that another principle exists outside provisional and real would be false speech. Since calming-and-contemplation discloses the real essence, it also embraces all principle.

2. Embracing All Delusion

Calming-and-contemplation also embraces all delusion. Because sentient beings are confused about the principle of truth, they give rise to the delusions that perpetuate cyclic birth and death. What is called confusion is ignorance.

Delusions within the Realms from Confusion about Provisional Principle

Confusion about provisional principle gives rise to associated ignorance, solitary-head ignorance, and the rest within the three realms. Ignorance joined with the various dispositions of the delusions of views and thoughts is called “associated.” Ignorance not associated with them is called “solitary-head.”

Because one does not understand the present matter, craving arises. Not understanding is “ignorance.” The activation of craving is “formations.” The mind that craves is “consciousness.” Consciousness arising together with the remaining aggregates of feeling, perception, and formations and with form is “name-and-form.” The material body activating the faculties is the “six entrances.” The six entrances reaching toward an object is “contact.” Contact conforming to the object conditioned is “feeling.” Delight arising toward the object felt is “craving.” Craving together with the bonds born along with it is “grasping.” The karma producing a future birth is “existence.” The arising of the five aggregates in the future is “birth.” The maturation of the five aggregates is “aging.” Their abandonment is “death.”

These twelve links turn like a wheel and in succession become causes and results for one another. Affliction communicates with karma, karma with suffering, and suffering again with affliction; together they are therefore called the “three paths.”

The wording of the Satyasiddhi Śāstra says that the functions of intention operate first within the latter three kinds of karma, while the actions of body and speech operate later within the former seven. The former seven are both karma and paths leading toward later lives. The latter three are not karma, but they lead to the former seven and therefore may also be called paths.

Scripture also calls the twelve links the “twelve entangling connections” and the “twelve wheels.” Because their binding is not exhausted, they are called wheels. Because births in the three times—past, present, and future—are separated from one another, this is called segmentary birth and death. These delusions cover the true truth and prevent sentient beings from liberation; this is illness. Once illness is clarified, its medicine can be known. The medicine is the calming-and-contemplation that enters emptiness from provisionality. Contemplating the medicine can also disclose the illness it treats. Delusions of this kind are therefore embraced by calming-and-contemplation that enters emptiness.

Delusions beyond the Realms from Confusion about Real Principle

Confusion about real principle gives rise to associated ignorance, solitary-head ignorance, and the rest beyond the three realms. Why? Although associated and solitary-head ignorance within the realms has been severed, habituations remain. Hīnayāna Dharma does not classify habituations as primary dispositions, but the Mahāyāna, speaking according to real meaning, treats them as another kind of delusion: ignorance beyond the realms.

The Ratnagotravibhāga therefore says that although people of the Two Vehicles have cultivated counteractions such as impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and non-self, they remain inverted with respect to the Buddha’s Dharma body. This inversion corresponds to “ignorance” and belongs to solitary-head ignorance. The karma activated by non-outflow wisdom is “formations.” The three kinds of mind-made body may also, by opening and gathering, be explained as five kinds. Mind there is “consciousness,” while body comprises “name-and-form,” the “six entrances,” “contact,” and “feeling.” The subtle delusions of ignorance and conceptual play not yet exhausted are “craving” and “grasping.” The stains of affliction, karma, and birth not yet exhausted are “existence.” The transference of the causes of the three kinds of mind-made body is “birth,” while the transformation of their retribution is “aging and death.”

Gathering these twelve links together gives the four obstructions in the realm of non-outflow: condition, characteristic, arising, and destruction. Condition belongs to the path of affliction, characteristic to the path of karma, and arising and destruction to the path of suffering. One can therefore know that the twelve links of dependent origination also exist beyond the three realms.

Why? Every station below buddhahood still has ignorance. Ignorance moistens karma; once karma is moistened, how could there be no suffering? Although these twelve links neither retreat into the three realms nor fall into a lower realm, ignorance can still revolve toward aging and death, and aging and death toward ignorance. The delusion that obstructs real principle is precisely this. It is treated by the two contemplations that enter provisionality and the Middle.

Discerning Sharp and Dull Faculties in Mind-Made Bodies

A further distinction is needed. Why? The three kinds of mind-made body include several different situations.

People of the Two Vehicles who enter emptiness by analyzing Dharmas or embodying Dharmas, bodhisattvas of the Shared Teaching, and others first exhaust delusions within the three realms but have never cultivated the provisional or middle contemplation. When born beyond the realms, none of their delusions there has been subdued, so their faculties are dull. In contemplating beyond the realms, they must cultivate successively for many eons, learning Buddha-Dharmas as numerous as the sands of the Ganges and first breaking delusions like dust and sand. Although dust-and-sand delusions do not directly moisten birth, they obstruct the path of teaching and transforming sentient beings and must therefore be severed first. Severing dust-and-sand delusions is only an expedient for disciplining one’s mind and can subdue delusions beyond the realms. They then sever the three paths beyond the realms, removing associated and solitary-head ignorance as well as branches and root. Provisional contemplation therefore directly embraces dust-and-sand delusions and also embraces ignorance along with them.

Practitioners of the Separate and Perfect Teachings, by contrast, have first exhausted shared delusions within the realms and have also subdued the distinct delusions beyond the realms. When born beyond the realms, their faculties are sharp. They cultivate only the middle contemplation to treat the three paths beyond the realms. From the first ground through the later grounds, every ground has three paths. At each ground a portion of ignorance is extinguished, karma is extinguished accordingly, and suffering is likewise extinguished. When the associated ignorance of a ground is removed, its solitary-head ignorance is also removed.

Although every ground already has wisdom, that wisdom remains mixed with ignorance not yet exhausted. Because it is mixed, this too may be called an obstruction of wisdom, for it obstructs the next portion of wisdom. Only the Buddha’s mind is entirely free of ignorance, so only there is the path of affliction ultimately exhausted. Because affliction is exhausted, karma is exhausted; because karma is exhausted, suffering is exhausted. Only in the Tathāgata are the three paths ultimately extinguished. Middle contemplation therefore embraces the treatment of delusions beyond the realms.

3. Embracing All Wisdom

Calming-and-contemplation also embraces all wisdom. The ways in which the various kinds of wisdom are opened and gathered have already been explained. When gathered back through the three contemplations, none remains unembraced. Worldly wisdom cannot illuminate principle and has already been included within the eleven wisdoms; if twenty wisdoms are explained broadly, they too are embraced by the three contemplations.

4. Embracing All Practice

Calming-and-contemplation also embraces every practice. The preceding item, wisdom, belongs to understanding; with understanding but without actual practice, one can never reach the goal. Practice has two kinds: wisdom-practice and practice-practice. From the two practices in the Tripiṭaka Teaching through those in the Perfect Teaching, none lies outside these two classes. Wisdom-practice is primary practice, while practice-practice is auxiliary practice.

Vipaśyanā can break afflictions, yet it still needs the power of śamatha to assist right knowledge and vision. Primary and auxiliary practices move with wisdom, like two feet advancing behind the eyes.

In the Tripiṭaka Teaching, contemplating impermanence and analyzing Dharmas to enter emptiness are wisdom-practice; contemplation of impurity, contemplation of kindness, and the rest are practice-practice. Both kinds of practice follow the wisdom that analyzes Dharmas into emptiness.

In the Shared Teaching, directly comprehending all Dharmas as illusions and transformations is wisdom-practice. Cultivating mindfulness of breathing and the establishments of mindfulness through every conditioned Dharma, as well as phenomenal calming-and-contemplation, is practice-practice. Both kinds follow the wisdom that embodies Dharmas and enters emptiness.

When one cultivates wisdom of the varieties of the path to teach and transform sentient beings, conditioning the principle of conventional truth is wisdom-practice, while conditioning the differentiated phenomena of the conventional is practice-practice. Both kinds follow wisdom of the varieties of the path and enter provisionality.

When one conditions true mark through the Middle Way, the one path pure, this is wisdom-practice. Passing through every Dharma gate, knowing that all perfections are Mahāyāna, that the twelve links of dependent origination are themselves buddha-nature, and that the establishments of mindfulness are themselves sitting at the place of awakening, and so forth, is practice-practice. Both kinds follow wisdom of the Middle Way and enter true mark.

The various gates of practice can be embraced through further distinctions:

  • In the four root dhyānas, concentration and wisdom are equal, so both calming and contemplation embrace them. Concentration in the desire realm has little concentration and much wisdom and belongs to the embrace of contemplation; the intermediate dhyāna is the same. The four formless concentrations have much concentration and little wisdom and belong to the embrace of calming.
  • Among the four immeasurable minds, the first three belong to the embrace of contemplation, while equanimity belongs to calming. The nine perceptions, eight recollections, and ten perceptions all belong to contemplation.
  • Of the eight liberations, the first three belong to the embrace of contemplation and the last five to calming. The nine successive concentrations, Lion’s-Spring Samādhi, Transcending Samādhi, and the rest all belong to calming.
  • The four establishments of mindfulness take wisdom as their nature and belong to the embrace of contemplation. In the terminology of the Four Intentional Calmings, making mind retain contemplations such as impurity is a calming function and belongs to calming, but contemplation remains primary in the end.
  • The four right efforts accomplish the four establishments of mindfulness and in general belong to contemplation. More finely distinguished, preventing the two kinds of evil Dharma from arising belongs to calming, while causing the two kinds of wholesome Dharma to arise belongs to contemplation.
  • The four bases of spiritual power attain concentration through four conditions and are named from the result attained; they therefore belong to calming.
  • Among the five faculties, faith, effort, and wisdom belong to the embrace of contemplation, while mindfulness and concentration belong to calming. From another perspective, faith and mindfulness may both extend across calming and contemplation. The five powers are the same.
  • Among the seven factors of awakening, investigation of Dharmas, joy, effort, and the others apart from equanimity and concentration belong to contemplation. Equanimity and concentration belong to calming, while mindfulness extends across both.
  • Among the eight right practices, right view and right intention belong to contemplation. Right action, right speech, and right livelihood belong to precepts and therefore to calming. Right mindfulness, right concentration, and right effort also belong to calming.
  • Among the Four Truths, suffering, origin, and path are conditioned practices and belong to the gate of contemplation; cessation is an unconditioned practice and belongs to the gate of calming. All sixteen aspects belong to contemplation.
  • The four great vows arise in dependence on the Four Truths, so their assignments follow the preceding meanings.
  • Among the eighteen distinctive Dharmas, the three kinds of action following wisdom belong to contemplation, while the three kinds of freedom from error belong to calming. Knowledge of the three times belongs to contemplation; the remaining items may be inferred according to their meanings.
  • Among the four fearlessnesses, fearlessness in omniscience belongs to contemplation, freedom from outflows to calming, the path leading to every destination to contemplation, and what obstructs the path to calming.
  • The three gates of samādhi belong to calming, while the three gates of liberation belong to contemplation.
  • The six perfections can be embraced in three ways. The first three are merit and belong to calming, while the latter three are wisdom and belong to contemplation. Or the first five may all be merit-adornment embraced by calming and prajñā alone embraced by contemplation. Or all six may be described generally as merit-adornment and entirely embraced by calming.

Thus the nine kinds of great dhyāna and the 108 samādhis all belong to the embrace of calming, while the eighteen emptinesses, ten similes, and five hundred dhāraṇīs belong to contemplation. In this way, no wisdom-practice or practice-practice remains outside calming-and-contemplation. One should know that although its name is concise, the meaning it embraces is vast.

5. Embracing All Stations

Calming-and-contemplation also embraces every station.

Someone may say: “One ground is itself the second ground, and the second is itself the third. In quiescent true thusness, where could successive stations exist?” From that perspective there are indeed no successive stations. Yet throughout the Mahāyāna scriptures all stations are also taught. Dharmas neither arise nor cease, and right wisdom has nothing attained, yet it can treat affliction, karma, and suffering. Since purification of the three paths has greater and lesser depths, differences exist within the unconditioned Dharma. What obstruction is there to establishing stations?

When the three paths are severed through analyzing Dharmas and entering emptiness by the four gates of existence, nonexistence, and the rest, the Abhidharma describes the distinctive station-characteristics of seven worthies, seven sages, and four fruits of a śramaṇa; the Satyasiddhi Śāstra describes twenty-seven worthies and sages. Through to stations in the gate of neither existence nor nonexistence, all are embraced by analytical contemplation of emptiness.

When the three paths are severed by directly embodying Dharmas and entering emptiness through the four gates, the shared stations of the Three Vehicles taught in the Great Perfection of Wisdom, from the ground of dry wisdom through the eighth ground, are all embraced by the same calming-and-contemplation that enters emptiness.

If one enters provisionality from emptiness and cultivates differentiated practices without grasping their profound intent, this becomes the stations of the thirty minds that subdue delusion and is embraced by the contemplations of emptiness and provisionality. If one has grasped the intent, can break the three paths, and accomplishes the stations of the ten grounds, it is embraced by the third, middle contemplation. The embrace may also be explained solely through provisional contemplation, and likewise through distinctions according to the four gates.

In the Perfect Teaching, one has faith, understanding, and practice while immediate phenomena are themselves principle. From the station of contemplative practice one enters the station of resemblance, then breaks ignorance and opens, shows, awakens to, and enters the Buddha’s knowledge and vision. The forty-two stations together mount the jeweled vehicle and go directly to the place of awakening. The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra says that by the fifteenth day the function of moonlight becomes increasingly manifest, a simile for the virtue of wisdom; from the sixteenth day its function gradually diminishes, a simile for the virtue of severance. One may also say that the fourteen prajñās are causal stations while the fifteenth, such as wondrous awakening, is the resultant station. All are embraced by middle contemplation and can likewise be distinguished through the four gates.

Questions and Answers on Stations and No Stations

Question: The Mahāyāna does not teach grounds and stations. What stations could calming-and-contemplation embrace?

Answer: Mahāyāna scriptures and treatises explicitly teach grounds and stations. Afraid of stations, you enter what you call no stations, but still do not escape attachment to “no bondage.” The nature of written words is free and is itself liberation. Although stations are spoken, stations still have no intrinsic nature.

The meaning of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā is this: if, like an opponent of emptiness, one destroys worldly cause and result, then there is no present or future life; if one destroys world-transcending cause and result, then there are no Three Jewels, Four Truths, or four fruits of a śramaṇa. Which kinds of Three Jewels would be absent in the end? If delusions of views were not extinguished, the Three Jewels, Four Truths, and fruits of a śramaṇa in the Tripiṭaka Teaching could not be established, much less those of the later Shared, Separate, and Perfect Teachings. This rebukes non-Buddhist paths for denying all four kinds of Three Jewels and the rest.

If one rebukes only the clumsy method of crossing, one retains only the Three Jewels, Four Truths, and fruits of a śramaṇa in the Tripiṭaka Teaching and has none of the fruits of the path in the later three teachings.

After the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā has performed its own refutation, the Three Jewels, Four Truths, and fruits of a śramaṇa remain established. When analytical Dharma breaks affliction, karma, and suffering within the realms, there are the Three Jewels, Four Truths, and fruits of a śramaṇa of the Tripiṭaka Teaching. When emptiness that embodies Dharmas breaks delusions, there are those of the later three teachings. Pointing out this key statement can both treat the inner obstructions of Buddhist practitioners and break external paths so as to guard against wrong views. Once the errors of the two extremes and the obstructions retained by the Hīnayāna are removed, the Three Jewels and Four Truths can be rightly established. How could one say that everything is wholly absent?

As for stations and no stations, one cannot ultimately know them without personal realization. For now, one trusts what the Buddha’s teaching says. When the teaching says they exist, the graded stations stand distinctly present; when it says they do not, they open unobstructedly into empty, quiescent purity. No meaning of a phrase is the bodhisattva’s meaning of a phrase. When stations are pointed out within emptiness, the stations themselves cannot be attained, so there should be no contention over them.

The four clauses of the verse in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā can also disclose the meaning of stations.

“Dharmas arising from causes and conditions, I say, are emptiness itself” means breaking affliction, karma, and suffering. There is therefore the stream-enterer’s wisdom and severance of delusion, as well as the bodhisattva’s endurance of nonarising Dharmas. The sixth ground is equal to the Two Vehicles, the seventh cultivates skillful means, and the tenth is like a buddha. The sequence of stations is naturally distinct—how could it be absent?

“They are also called provisional names” means successively breaking the three paths beyond the realms. There are therefore the forty-two stations of worthies and sages—how could they be absent?

“They are also called the meaning of the Middle Way” means perfectly breaking the afflictions of the five dwellings. There are therefore the stations of the six identities—how could they be absent?

These four clauses alone can embrace every station. No station lies outside the four clauses, and the four clauses do not lie outside calming-and-contemplation. This is why the section is called Embracing Stations.

6. Embracing All Teaching

Calming-and-contemplation also embraces all teaching. A Vibhāṣā says that mind can establish names for all Dharmas; without mind, there would be no names for any Dharma. One should therefore know that every worldly and world-transcending name and teaching arises from mind.

If one contemplates mind in a partial and wrong way, departing from right principle and following the stream of ignorance, every evil teaching arises, such as the ninety-five kinds of teaching of wrong views represented by Sāṃkhya and Vaiśeṣika. Mind also gives rise to many wholesome worldly teachings, including the five phases and six cyclical signs, yin and yang and the eight trigrams, the Five Classics, philosophers, histories, and other writings. These are all names and teachings established by worldly wisdom that cannot penetrate the world-transcending path, and all arise from mind.

How Does World-Transcending Teaching Arise from Mind?

How do all world-transcending names and teachings also arise from mind? The Ratnagotravibhāga by Sthiramati says that it is like an immense scripture scroll the size of a great trichiliocosm, recording every matter in that entire cosmos. Scrolls of different sizes corresponding to the medium and small chiliocosms, the four continents, the three realms, and the rest likewise record their matters and are stored in a single mote. This is true of one mote and of every mote.

Later, a person appears in the world and with a pure divine eye sees the immense scroll inside the mote. The person thinks: “Why is such an immense scroll stored inside a mote, unable to benefit all sentient beings?” Skillful means are then employed to break open the mote and bring forth the scroll for the benefit of others.

The scripture scroll of the Tathāgata’s unobstructed wisdom exists complete within the bodies of sentient beings. Only because inversion covers it are sentient beings unable to believe or see it. The Buddha teaches them to cultivate the Eightfold Noble Path and break every falsehood, causing them to see their own wisdom as equal to the Tathāgata’s. This is a simile based on a mote and established by lodging in conditioned phenomena.

There is also a simile stated in dependence upon space. The Treatise on Arousing the Mind of Awakening says that it is like someone who sees the Buddha-Dharma approaching extinction and writes the Tathāgata’s twelve divisions of scripture upward upon space, with every phrase and graph clearly complete, although no sentient being knows of them. After a long time, another person travels through space, sees the scriptural text, and laments: “Why do sentient beings neither know nor see it?” That person copies down the text, displays it, and guides sentient beings.

What does it mean to copy the scripture? It means causing sentient beings to cultivate the Eightfold Noble Path, break falsehood, and so forth.

There are several modes of cultivation. If one contemplates mind’s causes and conditions as arising and ceasing and impermanent and accordingly cultivates the Eightfold Noble Path, one writes out the scripture of the Tripiṭaka Teaching. If one contemplates mind’s conditionally arisen Dharmas as empty in their very essence and accordingly cultivates the Eightfold Noble Path, one writes out the scripture of the Shared Teaching. If one contemplates the Dharmas discriminated and reckoned by mind as immeasurable, beyond the knowing of ordinary beings and the Two Vehicles and visible only to bodhisattvas possessing the Dharma eye, and accordingly cultivates immeasurable forms of the Eightfold Noble Path, one writes out the scripture of the Separate Teaching. If one contemplates mind in its very essence as buddha-nature and perfectly cultivates the Eightfold Noble Path, one writes out the scripture of the Middle Way. Thus all Dharmas are disclosed as coming forth from mind. Mind is itself Mahāyāna; mind is itself buddha-nature; practitioners personally see their own wisdom as equal to the Tathāgata’s.

The teachings are next classified and embraced through contemplation of mind. Contemplating mind in its very essence as provisional and as Middle embraces the Avataṃsaka scriptures. Contemplating conditionally arisen Dharmas in mind as arising and ceasing embraces the Tripiṭaka Teaching of the Four Āgamas, like the flavor of milk. Contemplating mind as empty in its very essence embraces the shared prajñā, like the flavor of curds. Contemplating conditionally arisen Dharmas in mind fully as empty, provisional, and Middle in their very essence embraces the Vaipulya Teaching, like raw cream. Employing only the three contemplations of immediate emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle embraces the Great Perfection of Wisdom, like clarified cream. Contemplating mind with only immediate middle contemplation embraces the Lotus, opening the one great work of the Buddha’s knowledge and vision, the scripture of upright ghee. Contemplating mind through the mutual identity of the four clauses gives the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra, in which all equally see buddha-nature, also a scripture of ghee.

The simile of the five levels—milk, curds, raw cream, clarified cream, and ghee—further explains indeterminate teaching. If one contemplates dependent origination and also contemplates dependent origination as itself buddha-nature and buddha-nature as itself the Tathāgata, this is called killing a person in milk. If one contemplates analytical Dharma-emptiness and also contemplates analytical emptiness as itself buddha-nature and buddha-nature as itself the Tathāgata, it is called killing a person in curds. If one contemplates emptiness in the very essence and also contemplates immediate emptiness as itself buddha-nature, it is called killing a person in raw cream. If one contemplates provisional names and also contemplates provisional names as themselves buddha-nature, it is called killing a person in clarified cream. If one contemplates the immediate middle and also contemplates the immediate middle as itself buddha-nature, it is called killing a person in ghee.

Here “killing a person” throughout means that the two kinds of birth and death have been severed and the three paths of affliction, karma, and suffering purified. This is how calming-and-contemplation embraces indeterminate teaching.

The foregoing only explains the embrace of teaching in brief. Explained broadly, every scriptural teaching can be embraced by calming-and-contemplation; none remains outside its reach.

Mind’s embrace of all teachings also has two meanings in brief. First, all Dharma gates are complete within the minds of sentient beings. The Tathāgata clearly examines and sees the Dharmas in their minds, then teaches according to those minds; immeasurable teachings therefore issue from mind. Second, in the past the Tathāgata cultivated gradual and sudden contemplation of mind, complete in partial and perfect forms. According to those contemplations of mind, the Tathāgata teaches sentient beings and instructs disciples to learn from the Tathāgata’s breaking open the mote and bringing forth the scroll, and also to learn to write the scriptural text upward upon space. Every scriptural teaching is therefore embraced by the three calmings and three contemplations.

One Dharma Can Also Embrace All Dharmas

The preceding six intents embrace Dharmas in sequence and are readily understood. Now it is stated directly that any one of the six Dharmas can embrace all Dharmas.

First, one principle embraces not only all principle but also every delusion, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching.

Second, one delusion embraces not only all delusion but also every principle, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching.

Third, one wisdom embraces not only all wisdom but also every principle, delusion, practice, station, and teaching.

Fourth, one practice embraces not only all practice but also every principle, delusion, wisdom, station, and teaching.

Fifth, one station embraces not only all stations but also every principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, and teaching.

Sixth, one teaching embraces not only all teaching but also every principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, and station.

Thus, although calming-and-contemplation has a name of only two words, nothing in principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, station, or teaching—and nothing in the complete opening and gathering of any one Dharma—lies outside it.

義疏Exposition

『止觀名略,攝法不周。』這個疑問十分自然。世間與出世間的法如此繁多,理有權實,惑有內外,智行有淺深,位次與教門又各自展開;只說止、觀,會不會只是用兩個簡單的名字,遮住了法的差別?

本論的回答不是先增添更多名稱,而是指出止觀本來就站在一切法的要處。止使諸法寂靜,如灸病得穴,穴位一準,眾患皆除;觀能照見真理,如得珠王,一珠在手,眾寶皆獲。止不是眾多三昧之外的另一法,而是一切三昧所入的王三昧;觀也不是眾多智慧之外的一智,般若所應學的一切法,都不離觀智。名雖只有兩個,作用卻直達根本。

六攝不是六隻箱子

止觀攝法先開六意:理、惑、智、行、位、教。這六項不是把佛法分裝在六隻互不相干的箱子裡,而是一條由理到人的完整次第。

有佛出世也好,無佛出世也好,理性常住;眾生迷理,所以起生死惑;順理而觀,所以有智;有了解而不實行,終究不能到達,因此由解立行;由行證位;位滿之後,又轉而教化他人。理與事、解與行、因與果、自己與他人,就在這條次第上前後相承。

第一是攝理。諦理雖可隨根機開合,雖有偏圓、權實之別,權實之外卻沒有另一個理。正如摩黎山外沒有栴檀,若另立一理,便只是虛妄增益。止觀既能顯出法體,也就沒有一理遺在所顯之外。

惑不是一團黑暗,而是一個會轉動的輪

第二是攝惑。惑從迷理而起,迷就是無明。迷於權理,便有三界內的相應無明與獨頭無明。無明與見思諸使相合,名為相應;不與它們相應,名為獨頭。這一念不知,接著發為貪著,便可沿著十二因緣看見生死如何成立:不知是無明,貪動是行,貪心是識;識與其餘諸陰共起成名色,色動諸根成六入,根著境成觸,觸順境成受,於受中喜樂成愛,愛所生的纏縛成取,造未來業成有,未來諸陰起成生,陰熟為老,捨陰為死。

十二支並非排到老死便停止。煩惱通向業,業通向苦,苦又通向煩惱,三道彼此牽連;老死仍可輪回無明,所以稱輪。三世受生彼此間隔,所以稱分段。這個輪覆蔽真諦,使人不得解脫,便是應治之病;知道病,便知道藥是從假入空的止觀;觀察藥的作用,也能反過來認清病。因此界內惑全由入空止觀收攝。

迷於實理,則三界外仍有相應與獨頭無明。界內惑雖斷,習氣尚存;二乘雖以無常、苦、空、無我對治,對佛法身仍有顛倒。於是無漏智業可配為行,意生身可配識、名色、六入、觸、受,未盡的細惑與戲論可配愛取,未盡的三染可配有,意因移轉與果報變易可配生、老死。十二支又收成緣、相、生、壞四障,仍不出煩惱、業、苦三道。

界外的十二輪雖不退墮三界,仍從無明至老死、由老死至無明。根鈍者先斷界內惑,未習假、中,生到界外還須歷劫學習恒沙佛法,先破障礙化他的塵沙惑,再進斷界外三道。假觀正治塵沙,也能兼伏無明。根利者通惑已盡、別惑已伏,只須修中觀,從初地到後地,分分滅無明,業與苦也隨之分分而滅。唯有佛心全無無明,三道才究竟清淨。止觀攝惑,所收的因此不只是一時煩惱,而是生死從何處發動、如何相續、又如何層層止息的全幅圖景。

有眼還要有足

第三是攝智。世間智不照理,各種出世智慧無論開合多少,都可由三觀收攝。但有了解而沒有實行,終究無所至,所以第四緊接著說攝行。

本論在這裡不重新列出十一智或二十智,而以『如前所說』承接前文。世間智雖不能照理,也已為十一智所收;若再廣明二十智,也仍由三觀完全收攝。分類可以開合,觀智照理的作用卻沒有遺漏。

行分慧行與行行。慧行是正行,行行是助行;毘婆舍那能破煩惱,還須奢摩他協助正知見。正行與助行隨智慧運轉,如雙足隨眼:眼辨方向,足使人抵達。三藏以無常、析法為慧行,以不淨、慈心等為行行;通教以體法如幻為慧行,以數息、念處及緣事止觀為行行;為化眾生而緣俗理,是慧行,歷俗事是行行;緣中道實相而一道清淨,是慧行,歷一切法門而見諸度皆是大乘、十二因緣即是佛性,是行行。

這一正一助,再展開便能收攝修道的一切行門。定慧均等者由止觀兩攝;定少慧多者偏於觀,定多慧少者偏於止。四無量心、九想、八念、十想、八背捨、九次第定,各按寂止或觀照而有所歸。四念處以慧為性,重在觀;若說四意止,使心記持不淨等,也有止的作用。四正勤可總歸於觀,又可細分惡不生屬止、善生長屬觀;四如意足由因得定,以果立名,歸於止。

五根、五力、七覺分、八正道也依其作用分攝,念有時通於兩邊。四諦中有為之行屬觀,無為之滅屬止;十六行屬觀。四弘依四諦而起。十八不共法與四無畏,也依三業、無失、知三世、一切智、漏盡、至處道、障道等作用歸入止觀。三三昧門由止攝,三解脫門由觀攝。六度既可前三歸功德、後三歸智慧,也可前五歸功德而般若歸觀,還可總以功德莊嚴歸止。乃至九種大禪、一百零八三昧,十八空、十喻、五百陀羅尼,所有慧行與行行,無一走出止觀。

這一長串分攝不是名相陳列。它反覆問同一件事:某一行門如何令心寂止,如何令理顯明,又如何讓眼與足彼此成就。名稱可以繁多,修行中的止與觀不能相離。

有位而不住位,無位而不壞因果

第五是攝位。有人以寂滅真如為理由,說一地就是二地、二地就是三地,真如之中無有次位。本論先承認無生無滅、正慧無所得,又隨即指出:正慧雖無所得,仍能對治煩惱、業、苦;三道清淨有深淺,無為法中也就可以說差別。大乘經處處明位,說無所得並不等於抹去修證因果。

析法入空有七賢、七聖、四沙門果等位;體法入空有三乘共位;從空入假,未得其意者成伏惑位,得意而能破三道者成十地位;圓教由信、解、行,從觀行進入相似,破無明而開示悟入佛知見,四十二位同乘寶乘直至道場。十五日月光之用轉而顯著,可以譬智德;十六日月光之用漸減,可以譬斷德。位次顯出智增惑減,卻沒有把真如切成一級一級的實物。

面對『大乘不明地位』的質問,本論先問:若執著無位,是否也把因果、三寶、四諦與四沙門果一併破壞?文字性本離,當體就是解脫;所以說位並不使位有自性,說無位也不應成為新的束縛。依教說有,階位宛然;依教說無,豁同空淨。在空義中說位,位不可得;正因不可得,也不必為有、無二句爭執。

本論接著分辨,破執不等於破壞一切。若把世間因果破到沒有今世、後世,把出世因果破到沒有三寶、四諦、四沙門果,連最初的道果都不能成立,更不可能有後三種道果。真正的空義不是如此:以析法破界內煩惱、業、苦,三藏的三寶、四諦、四沙門果便能成立;以體法破惑,後三種三寶、四諦、四沙門果也能成立。所破的是兩邊的滯著,因果與道果並未被破除。

因緣所生法可以說空,也可施設假名,並顯中道。依空破界內三道,有相應的智慧與斷惑之位;依假漸破界外三道,有賢聖位;依中圓破五住,有六即之位。四句攝一切位,四句又不出止觀。有位而不把位實體化,無位而不壞修證因果,才是止觀攝位所守的兩面。

教法如何從心中展開

第六是攝教。心能為一切法安立名字;若沒有心,便沒有一切名字。觀心偏邪而順無明流,會生各種邪見之教;心也能生五行、六甲、陰陽、經史等世間善教。世間名教如此,出世名教也從心起。

本論先用微塵藏經卷的譬喻說明。極大的經卷記錄大千世界的一切事,卻完整藏在一粒微塵中;一切微塵也都如此。有智慧的人看見經卷,便破塵出卷,使它利益眾生。如來智慧完整具足於眾生身中,只因顛倒覆蔽而不能得見;修八聖道、破除虛妄,便能看見自己的智慧與如來平等。

另一譬喻把十二部經仰寫在虛空中。字句宛然,眾生卻看不見;有人在空中看見,便將它書寫下來,開示眾生。觀心因緣生滅無常,修八正道,是寫出三藏之經;觀因緣生法當體即空,是寫出通教之經;觀心所具差別無量,是寫出別教之經;觀心即是佛性,是寫出中道之經。破塵與寫空,一從覆藏中開顯,一從空中施設文字,都在說教法不是外加於心的異物。

因此,觀心即假、即中,可攝《華嚴》;觀因緣生滅,可攝《四阿含》;觀當體即空,可攝共般若;具觀即空、即假、即中,可攝《方等》;用三觀可攝《大品》;用中觀開佛知見,可攝《法華》;以四句相即觀心,可攝《涅槃》。又依五層觀法顯不定教:觀因緣而同時見因緣即佛性,是乳中殺人;觀析空而見析空即佛性,是酪中殺人;觀即空而見即空即佛性,是生酥殺人;觀假名而見假名即佛性,是熟酥殺人;觀即中而見即中即佛性,是醍醐殺人。本論自釋所謂殺人,就是兩種生死已斷、三道已經清淨。

一切教從心開出,又有兩層意思。眾生心中具一切法門,如來照見其心,按其心法而說,所以無量教法從心而出;如來往昔也曾修漸頓觀心,偏圓具足,再依此心觀教眾生破塵出卷、仰寫空經。心不是把教法縮成一種內在感受,而是教法得以開顯、施設與化他的根源。

六法相攝,還剩哪一法在外

六意依次展開之後,本論沒有停在六條平行分類。它再說一法攝一切法:一理攝理、惑、智、行、位、教;一惑也攝其餘五法;一智、一行、一位、一教,皆各自攝盡六法。

這六句逐項列明:第一,一理不只攝一切理,也攝一切惑、一切智、一切行、一切位、一切教。第二,一惑不只攝一切惑,也攝一切理、一切智、一切行、一切位、一切教。第三,一智不只攝一切智,也攝一切理、一切惑、一切行、一切位、一切教。

第四,一行不只攝一切行,也攝一切理、一切惑、一切智、一切位、一切教。第五,一位不只攝一切位,也攝一切理、一切惑、一切智、一切行、一切教。第六,一教不只攝一切教,也攝一切理、一切惑、一切智、一切行、一切位。六句各從當門起說,所列都是同一組理、惑、智、行、位、教;每一句都把自身與其餘五法一同收入。到此,直接結論仍是止觀名略而攝法周遍:六法依次可分,任何一法又都不在止觀之外。

輔行之眼

上來順本論自身由六意到一法相攝的次第而讀。湛然《輔行》再把幾處容易混讀的關節分開。

第一,止觀二名雖略,其體並不因此不周;止觀是能攝,理、惑、智、行、位、教是所攝。這是能攝、所攝的上一層關係。文有六章;義有次第、不次第二義;意唯同歸圓頓止觀,也就是文六、義二、意一。末段湛然再逐門解釋一理至一教如何各攝餘五〔T1912 0245a06–0245b16〕;這些理由屬《輔行》所釋,不倒寫成本論已逐項說出的原句。

第二,界內惑段引用《成實論》,緊接十二因緣之後,卻不是再用十二因緣解那句話。湛然明辨論文所說的是十業道:意三先發而列在文後,身口七業後動而列在文前;引論正是以三業解三道。本論又用能通後世、能通前七說明彼此通達,不能把這些改寫冒充今本論文的逐字原句。若只因編排相鄰而把它讀成十二支,便改變了所釋對象。

第三,界內與界外雖同用無明、行乃至老死之名,所指的體並不相同。界外配釋又有開合:三種意生身可開為五種,四障可收三道;鈍根先斷塵沙,再進破相應、獨頭的枝本,假觀正攝塵沙而旁攝無明;利根則以中觀直治界外三道。這些是湛然對本論短句的分層,不可倒置成正文已逐項說出的定義。

第四,本論把慧行稱正、行行稱助,是隨文建立的分判;湛然另指出,定慧其實都屬正修,不淨、慈心等事觀才是助行。兩個層次並存,便不會把止當成只能附助觀的次要方法。各行門歸止、歸觀,也是在所攝作用上分說,不是把每一法永遠鎖在單一門中。

第五,經中說無位,在本論所引只見一處;上下文卻廣明位次。湛然據此斷定,執無位便會落入無因無果。無位須與有位相即而讀:位不可得,並不取消斷惑、證果的差別;建立位次,也不使真如變成有階級的實體。

第六,凡有指示、分判與辨說,都可納入教,所以世間邪正與出世偏圓皆在所攝之中。攝教的兩個譬喻又各有作用:破微塵取經卷,顯眾生心中本具法門而被惑覆藏;仰寫空經,顯依觀行施設教文。漸、頓等教既從眾生心法與如來往昔觀心而出,心攝教便不只是『一切名稱由心』的抽象命題,而同時含有開顯自具與隨機化他的方向。

這面鏡最後把名略與義廣重新扣緊。止觀不是把一切法壓成兩個標籤;它以寂照為能攝,以六法為所攝,先依次第展示迷悟、解行、因果與自他的路,再在一法相攝中顯出全體。能守住正文的次第,也看見末後的不次第,才不會在繁多名相中失去一根一穴,也不會以一根一穴抹平法門的差別。

“The names calming-and-contemplation are concise; their embrace of Dharmas is incomplete.” The doubt is entirely natural. Worldly and world-transcending Dharmas are so numerous: principle may be provisional or real, delusion internal or external, wisdom and practice shallow or deep, while stations and gates of teaching each unfold in their own way. If only calming and contemplation are spoken, do two simple names merely cover over the differences among Dharmas?

The treatise does not answer by first adding more names. It points out that calming-and-contemplation already stands at the vital point of all Dharmas. Calming makes them quiescent, like cauterizing illness and finding the point: once the point is accurate, every ailment is removed. Contemplation illuminates principle, like obtaining the jewel king: with this one jewel in hand, all treasures are acquired. Calming is not another Dharma outside the many samādhis, but the king samādhi into which they all enter. Nor is contemplation one wisdom outside the many wisdoms; none of the Dharmas that prajñā should study departs from contemplative wisdom. There are only two names, yet their function reaches the root directly.

The Six Embraces Are Not Six Boxes

The embrace of Dharmas by calming-and-contemplation first opens six intents: principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching. They do not pack the Buddha-Dharma into six unrelated boxes. They form one complete sequence extending from principle to persons.

Whether a Buddha appears or does not appear, the nature of principle constantly abides. Sentient beings are confused about principle, and so the delusions of birth and death arise. They contemplate in accord with principle, and so there is wisdom. Understanding without implementation can never reach its destination, so practice is established from understanding. Practice leads to realization of stations. When stations are fulfilled, one turns to teaching and transforming others. Principle and phenomena, understanding and practice, cause and result, and self and others follow one another within this sequence.

First is embracing principle. Although the principle of truths may be opened and gathered according to faculties, and although partial and perfect or provisional and real differ, no separate principle exists outside provisional and real. Just as there is no sandalwood beyond Mount Moli, establishing another principle would be a false addition. Since calming-and-contemplation can disclose Dharma-essence, no principle is left outside what it discloses.

Delusion Is Not a Mass of Darkness but a Turning Wheel

Second is embracing delusion. Delusion arises from confusion about principle, and confusion is ignorance. Confusion about provisional principle gives rise to associated and solitary-head ignorance within the three realms. Ignorance joined with the dispositions of views and thoughts is called associated; ignorance not associated with them is called solitary-head. From this one thought of not knowing, craving is activated, and the establishment of birth and death can be seen along the twelve links. Not knowing is ignorance; the movement of craving is formations; the craving mind is consciousness. Consciousness arising with the other aggregates is name-and-form; form activating the faculties becomes the six entrances; faculties adhering to objects become contact; contact conforming to objects becomes feeling; delight within feeling becomes craving; the bonds born from craving become grasping; making future karma becomes existence; the future aggregates arising become birth; the aggregates maturing become aging; abandoning them becomes death.

The twelve links do not stop when their list reaches aging and death. Affliction communicates with karma, karma with suffering, and suffering again with affliction; the three paths are bound together. Aging and death can still revolve back to ignorance, hence the name wheel. Births in the three times are separated from one another, hence segmentary. This wheel covers the true truth and prevents liberation, so it is the illness to be treated. Once the illness is known, the medicine is known as calming-and-contemplation that enters emptiness from provisionality. Observing the medicine’s action can in turn clarify the illness. All delusions within the realms are therefore embraced by calming-and-contemplation that enters emptiness.

Confusion about real principle means that associated and solitary-head ignorance remain beyond the three realms. Although delusions within the realms have been severed, habituations remain. Although the Two Vehicles treat them through impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and non-self, inversion remains with respect to the Buddha’s Dharma body. Karma produced by non-outflow wisdom may therefore correspond to formations; mind-made bodies to consciousness, name-and-form, the six entrances, contact, and feeling; subtle delusions and conceptual play not yet exhausted to craving and grasping; the three stains not yet exhausted to existence; and the transference of mind-made causes and transformation of their results to birth, aging, and death. The twelve links then gather into four obstructions—condition, characteristic, arising, and destruction—without leaving the three paths of affliction, karma, and suffering.

Although the twelve-spoked wheel beyond the realms does not fall back into the three realms, it still turns from ignorance to aging and death and from aging and death to ignorance. Those of dull faculties first sever delusions within the realms but have not cultivated the provisional and middle contemplations. Born beyond the realms, they must spend eons learning Buddha-Dharmas as numerous as the sands of the Ganges, first breaking dust-and-sand delusions that obstruct teaching others and then advancing to sever the three paths beyond the realms. Provisional contemplation directly treats dust-and-sand delusions and can also subdue ignorance. Those of sharp faculties have exhausted shared delusions and subdued distinct delusions; they need only cultivate middle contemplation. From the first ground through the later grounds, portions of ignorance are extinguished and karma and suffering extinguished portion by portion along with it. Only in the Buddha’s mind is ignorance entirely absent and the three paths ultimately pure. What calming-and-contemplation embraces as delusion is therefore not merely a temporary affliction, but the whole picture of how birth and death begin, continue, and cease layer by layer.

Eyes Still Need Feet

Third is embracing wisdom. Worldly wisdom does not illuminate principle, while every kind of world-transcending wisdom, however extensively opened or gathered, can be embraced by the three contemplations. Yet understanding without implementation reaches nowhere, so the fourth intent immediately follows: embracing practice.

The treatise does not list the eleven or twenty wisdoms again here; “as explained above” carries forward the preceding discussion. Although worldly wisdom cannot illuminate principle, it has already been included among the eleven wisdoms. If twenty wisdoms are explained more broadly, the three contemplations still embrace them completely. Classifications may open or gather, but no function of contemplative wisdom illuminating principle is omitted.

Practice divides into wisdom-practice and practice-practice. Wisdom-practice is primary and practice-practice auxiliary. Vipaśyanā can break afflictions, yet śamatha is still needed to assist right knowledge and vision. Primary and auxiliary practices move with wisdom like two feet following the eyes: the eyes discern direction and the feet make arrival possible. The Tripiṭaka Teaching takes impermanence and analytical Dharma as wisdom-practice and impurity, kindness, and the rest as practice-practice. The Shared Teaching takes embodying Dharmas as illusion for wisdom-practice and mindfulness of breathing, establishments of mindfulness, and phenomenal calming-and-contemplation for practice-practice. Conditioning conventional principle to transform sentient beings is wisdom-practice, while passing through conventional phenomena is practice-practice. Conditioning the true mark of the Middle Way so the one path is pure is wisdom-practice; passing through every Dharma gate and seeing all perfections as Mahāyāna and the twelve links as themselves buddha-nature is practice-practice.

This primary and auxiliary pair can expand to embrace all gates of practice on the path. Where concentration and wisdom are equal, calming and contemplation both embrace the gate. Little concentration and much wisdom inclines toward contemplation; much concentration and little wisdom toward calming. The four immeasurable minds, nine perceptions, eight recollections, ten perceptions, eight liberations, and nine successive concentrations are assigned according to quiescing or illuminating. The four establishments of mindfulness take wisdom as their nature and emphasize contemplation; when termed the Four Intentional Calmings and used to make mind retain impurity and the other contemplations, they also have a calming function. The four right efforts may generally belong to contemplation but may be distinguished so that preventing evil belongs to calming and causing goodness to grow to contemplation. The four bases of spiritual power obtain concentration through causes and are named from the result, so they belong to calming.

The five faculties, five powers, seven factors of awakening, and Eightfold Path are likewise divided according to function, with mindfulness sometimes extending across both sides. Among the Four Truths, conditioned practices belong to contemplation and unconditioned cessation to calming; the sixteen aspects belong to contemplation. The four great vows arise from the Four Truths. The eighteen distinctive Dharmas and four fearlessnesses enter calming or contemplation according to the functions of threefold action, freedom from error, knowledge of the three times, omniscience, exhaustion of outflows, the path to destinations, and obstruction of the path. The three gates of samādhi are embraced by calming and the three gates of liberation by contemplation. The six perfections may be divided so that the first three belong to merit and the latter three to wisdom, or the first five to merit and prajñā to contemplation, or all six as merit-adornment to calming. Through to the nine great dhyānas and 108 samādhis, the eighteen emptinesses, ten similes, and five hundred dhāraṇīs, no wisdom-practice or practice-practice escapes calming-and-contemplation.

This long series of assignments is not a display of technical names. It repeatedly asks the same question: how does a particular gate of practice make mind quiescent, how does it make principle clear, and how do eyes and feet accomplish one another? Names may be many, but calming and contemplation cannot be separated in cultivation.

Stations without Abiding in Stations, No Stations without Destroying Cause and Result

Fifth is embracing stations. Someone appeals to quiescent true thusness and says that one ground is the second and the second the third, so no successive stations exist in thusness. The treatise first acknowledges that there is neither arising nor cessation and that right wisdom attains nothing, but then points out that right wisdom can still treat affliction, karma, and suffering. Since purification of the three paths has greater and lesser depth, differences may be spoken even within unconditioned Dharma. Mahāyāna scriptures teach stations throughout; nothing attained does not mean erasing cause and result in cultivation and realization.

Analytical entry into emptiness has stations such as the seven worthies, seven sages, and four fruits of a śramaṇa. Direct entry into emptiness by embodying Dharmas has shared stations of the Three Vehicles. In entering provisionality from emptiness, those who have not grasped its intent attain stations that subdue delusion, while those who grasp it and can break the three paths attain the stations of the ten grounds. In the Perfect Teaching, faith, understanding, and practice lead from contemplative practice into resemblance; ignorance is broken, the Buddha’s knowledge and vision opened, shown, awakened to, and entered, and the forty-two stations together mount the jeweled vehicle to the place of awakening. Moonlight becoming more manifest through the fifteenth day can represent the virtue of wisdom; its diminishing from the sixteenth can represent the virtue of severance. Stations disclose wisdom increasing and delusion decreasing without cutting true thusness into a set of substantial levels.

When faced with the objection that Mahāyāna does not clarify grounds and stations, the treatise first asks whether attachment to no stations also destroys cause and result, the Three Jewels, Four Truths, and four fruits of a śramaṇa. The nature of written words is originally free and is liberation in its very essence. Speaking of stations therefore does not give stations an intrinsic nature, while speaking of no stations should not become a new bondage. According to teaching, when they exist the graded stations stand distinctly present; when they do not, they open unobstructedly into empty purity. Stations spoken within emptiness cannot be attained. Precisely because they cannot be attained, there is no reason to contend over the alternatives existence and nonexistence.

The treatise then distinguishes breaking attachment from destroying everything. If worldly cause and result are broken until present and future life no longer exist, and world-transcending cause and result until the Three Jewels, Four Truths, and fruits of a śramaṇa no longer exist, even the first fruits of the path cannot be established, much less the later three kinds. The true meaning of emptiness is not like this. When analytical Dharma breaks affliction, karma, and suffering within the realms, the Tripiṭaka Teaching’s Three Jewels, Four Truths, and fruits of a śramaṇa can be established. When direct embodiment of Dharmas breaks delusion, those of the later three teachings can also be established. What is broken is fixation on the two extremes, not cause and result or the fruits of the path.

Conditionally arisen Dharmas can be called empty, provisionally designated, and expressive of the Middle Way. Through emptiness, the three paths within the realms are broken and corresponding stations of wisdom and severance established. Through provisionality, the three paths beyond the realms are gradually broken and stations of worthies and sages established. Through the Middle, the five dwellings are perfectly broken and the stations of the six identities established. The four clauses embrace all stations, and the four clauses do not leave calming-and-contemplation. Stations without substantializing stations, and no stations without destroying cause and result in cultivation and realization: these are the two aspects preserved when calming-and-contemplation embraces stations.

How Teaching Unfolds from Mind

Sixth is embracing teaching. Mind can establish names for all Dharmas; without mind, there would be no names. Contemplating mind partially and wrongly while following the stream of ignorance gives rise to teachings of wrong views. Mind also gives rise to wholesome worldly teachings such as the five phases, six cyclical signs, yin and yang, classics, and histories. As worldly names and teachings arise from mind, so do world-transcending ones.

The treatise first explains this through the simile of a scripture scroll hidden in a mote. An immense scroll records every matter in a great trichiliocosm yet is stored complete inside one mote; every mote is the same. A person of wisdom sees the scroll, breaks open the mote, and brings it forth to benefit sentient beings. The Tathāgata’s wisdom exists complete in sentient beings’ bodies but cannot be seen because inversion covers it. By cultivating the Eightfold Noble Path and breaking falsehood, one sees one’s own wisdom as equal to the Tathāgata’s.

Another simile writes the twelve divisions of scripture upward upon space. Every phrase stands clearly present but sentient beings cannot see it. Someone sees it in space, copies it down, and discloses it to them. Contemplating mind’s causes and conditions as arising, ceasing, and impermanent and cultivating the Eightfold Path writes out the Tripiṭaka scripture. Contemplating conditionally arisen Dharmas as empty in their very essence writes out the Shared-Teaching scripture. Contemplating the immeasurable distinctions complete in mind writes out the Separate-Teaching scripture. Contemplating mind as buddha-nature writes out the scripture of the Middle Way. Breaking the mote and writing in space—one discloses from concealment, the other establishes written teaching within emptiness. Both say that teaching is not something alien added to mind.

Contemplating mind as immediately provisional and Middle therefore embraces the Avataṃsaka. Contemplating dependent origination as arising and ceasing embraces the Four Āgamas. Contemplating emptiness in the very essence embraces shared prajñā. Fully contemplating immediate emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle embraces the Vaipulya teachings. The three contemplations embrace the Great Perfection of Wisdom. Middle contemplation that opens the Buddha’s knowledge and vision embraces the Lotus. Contemplating mind through the mutual identity of the four clauses embraces the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra. Five levels of contemplation also disclose indeterminate teaching: contemplating dependent origination while seeing it as itself buddha-nature is killing in milk; contemplating analytical emptiness while seeing it as buddha-nature is killing in curds; contemplating immediate emptiness while seeing it as buddha-nature is killing in raw cream; contemplating provisional names while seeing them as buddha-nature is killing in clarified cream; contemplating the immediate Middle while seeing it as buddha-nature is killing in ghee. The treatise itself explains that killing here means that the two kinds of birth and death are severed and the three paths purified.

All teaching unfolds from mind in two senses. Every Dharma gate is present in the minds of sentient beings; the Tathāgata sees their minds and teaches according to their mental Dharmas, so immeasurable teachings issue from mind. The Tathāgata also cultivated gradual and sudden contemplation of mind in the past, complete in both partial and perfect forms, and according to those contemplations teaches sentient beings to break the mote and bring forth the scroll and to write scripture upon space. Mind does not reduce teaching to a kind of inward feeling. It is the source through which teaching is disclosed, established, and used to transform others.

When the Six Dharmas Mutually Embrace, What Could Remain Outside?

After the six intents unfold in sequence, the treatise does not stop with six parallel classifications. It further says that one Dharma embraces all Dharmas. One principle embraces principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching. One delusion likewise embraces the other five. One wisdom, one practice, one station, and one teaching each fully embraces all six.

The six statements spell this out item by item. First, one principle embraces not only all principle but also all delusion, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching. Second, one delusion embraces not only all delusion but also all principle, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching. Third, one wisdom embraces not only all wisdom but also all principle, delusion, practice, station, and teaching.

Fourth, one practice embraces not only all practice but also all principle, delusion, wisdom, station, and teaching. Fifth, one station embraces not only all stations but also all principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, and teaching. Sixth, one teaching embraces not only all teaching but also all principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, and station. Each statement begins from its own gate but lists the same set: principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching. Every one gathers itself and the other five together. The direct conclusion remains that the names calming-and-contemplation are concise while their embrace of Dharmas is comprehensive. The six may be distinguished in sequence, yet no one Dharma lies outside calming-and-contemplation.

Through the Eye of the Fuxing

The reading above follows the treatise’s own sequence from the six intents to the mutual embrace by one Dharma. Zhanran’s Fuxing further separates several junctures that can easily be conflated.

First, although the two names calming and contemplation are concise, their essence is not thereby incomplete. Calming-and-contemplation is what embraces; principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching are what is embraced. This is the higher-level relation between embracer and embraced. The text has six chapters; the meaning has two aspects, successive and nonsuccessive; the purport converges solely upon perfect-and-sudden calming-and-contemplation. Thus there are six in text, two in meaning, and one in purport. In the final passage, Zhanran separately explains how one principle through one teaching each embraces the remaining five〔T1912 0245a06–0245b16〕. Those reasons belong to the Fuxing’s explanation and are not retrojected as if the base treatise had stated them one by one.

Second, the passage on delusions within the realms cites the Satyasiddhi Śāstra immediately after the twelve links but does not use the twelve links to explain that sentence again. Zhanran distinguishes the ten paths of karma: the three intentional actions are activated first but listed later, while the seven bodily and verbal acts are activated later but listed earlier. The treatise is cited precisely to explain the three paths through the three kinds of karma. The base text also uses leading to future lives and leading to the former seven to explain mutual communication; these cannot be rewritten and passed off as verbatim sentences of the extant treatise. Reading them as the twelve links merely because of their adjacent arrangement changes the object being explained.

Third, although the same names—ignorance, formations, and so on through aging and death—are used within and beyond the realms, the essences indicated differ. The correspondence beyond the realms also opens and gathers in several ways: three mind-made bodies may open into five, while four obstructions may gather into three paths. Those of dull faculties first sever dust-and-sand delusions, then advance to break the branches and root of associated and solitary-head ignorance; provisional contemplation directly embraces dust-and-sand delusions and secondarily embraces ignorance. Those of sharp faculties use middle contemplation to treat the three paths beyond the realms directly. These are Zhanran’s layers of explanation for the treatise’s concise sentences and cannot be reversed into definitions already enumerated by the base text.

Fourth, the treatise calls wisdom-practice primary and practice-practice auxiliary as a distinction established within its immediate exposition. Zhanran separately points out that concentration and wisdom are actually both primary cultivation; only phenomenal contemplations such as impurity and kindness are auxiliary. When both levels remain present, calming is not reduced to a minor method that can only assist contemplation. Assigning different gates of practice to calming or contemplation also distinguishes their function as what is embraced; it does not lock every Dharma permanently into a single gate.

Fifth, the scripture’s statement of no stations appears only once in the passage cited by the treatise, whereas the surrounding text extensively clarifies stations. Zhanran therefore judges that attachment to no stations falls into having neither cause nor result. No stations must be read as immediately identical with stations: the unattainability of stations does not cancel differences in severing delusion and realizing fruits, while establishing stations does not turn true thusness into a graded substance.

Sixth, whatever gives indication, classification, or explanation can be included as teaching, so worldly teachings, wrong or right, and world-transcending teachings, partial or perfect, are all embraced. The two similes for embracing teaching also have separate functions. Breaking open the mote and taking out the scroll reveals the Dharma gates inherently complete in sentient beings’ minds but hidden by delusion. Writing scripture upward on space reveals the establishment of teaching-text through contemplative practice. Since gradual and sudden teachings issue both from sentient beings’ mental Dharmas and from the Tathāgata’s past contemplation of mind, the embrace of teaching by mind is not merely the abstract proposition that all names come from mind. It simultaneously points toward disclosing what is inherently complete and transforming others according to their faculties.

This mirror finally fastens concise names and expansive meaning together again. Calming-and-contemplation does not compress every Dharma into two labels. With quiescence and illumination as what embraces and the six Dharmas as what is embraced, it first displays in sequence the roads from confusion to awakening, understanding to practice, cause to result, and self to others, then discloses the whole through the mutual embrace by one Dharma. Only by preserving the base text’s sequence while also seeing the nonsuccessive conclusion can one avoid losing the one root and one point among the many names and characteristics—without using that root and point to flatten the differences among Dharma gates.

考據Apparatus

本單元是十廣第四。智者先破『止觀名略,攝法不周』之疑,再開理、惑、智、行、位、教六意,逐門說明三止三觀如何遍攝;最後又令六法各攝其餘五法,由次第開合轉入一法互攝。全文起於「第四、明攝法者」〔T1911 0029c02〕,止於0032a12所結的一教攝餘五之句。

一、科判定位

十廣依次為大意、釋名、體相、攝法、偏圓、方便、正觀、果報、起教、旨歸。攝法承體相而來,下接偏圓;所答的核心問題是:止、觀只有兩個簡約名目,何以能遍收一切法。論主以治病得穴、得珠王兩譬先作總答,再以六意廣說。

依本論文勢與《止觀輔行傳弘決》逐文對位,可分十五節:

本論範圍內容《止觀輔行傳弘決》對位
0029c02–0029c08來意、立疑、總答與能攝二譬0239b07–0239b16
0029c08–0029c14六意開章及其次第0239b17–0239c10
0029c15–0029c18三止三觀攝一切理0239c11–0239c13
0029c18–0030a05迷權理之界內惑、十二因緣與三道0239c13–0240b18
0030a06–0030a22迷實理之界外惑、意生身與四障0240b19–0241a07
0030a22–0030b08意生身利鈍料簡0241a07–0241a23
0030b09–0030b12三觀攝一切智0241a23–0241b14
0030b12–0030b26正助二行及四教慧行、行行0241b14–0241c01
0030b27–0030c22禪、道品、六度等諸行門總攝0241c02–0242a24
0030c23–0030c27無位、有位總論0242a25–0242c05
十一0030c27–0031a13四教諸位0242c05–0243a08
十二0031a13–0031b11破無位執,以《中論》四句攝位0243a09–0243c11
十三0031b11–0031b17世間名教從心起0243c12–0244b07
十四0031b17–0032a06出世教、四教五時與不定教皆從心起0244b08–0244c22
十五0032a06–0032a12六法各攝其餘五法0244c23–0245b23

論主先明六意相生:理常住而眾生迷理起惑;順理而觀,所以有智;有解而立行;由行證位;位滿而教他。末段則不再依此前後,只說一理乃至一教,各自攝盡其餘五法。

二、成立與傳本

本單元承緣起所誌玉泉一夏、智者說、灌頂記及現存傳本未完之事;未完三重證與會本沿革詳見緣起單元,本處只繫其來源,不再展開,也不據此推斷未完之故。《止觀輔行傳弘決》卷首序署「君山除饉男普門子敬序」〔T1912 0141b06〕,正文另署「唐毘陵沙門湛然述」〔T1912 0141b18〕;序者與述者分層,不可混作湛然自序。

三、所引經論覆核

本目依本論次第全列可識別引文、典籍指稱與經論場景。智者原句與今本異者並錄不判;部類稱、教類稱或未能唯一鎖定今本者,據實標明,不強配單一藏號。

本論明題的經論與教類

《摩訶止觀》原句今本對讀覆核
「《大品》有百二十條及一切法,皆言當學般若」〔T1911 0029c06〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223:「欲以一切種智知一切法,當習行般若波羅蜜」〔T223 0218c18〕;後文「當學般若波羅蜜」〔T223 0219a27〕反覆出現今本可證一切所欲皆歸學般若;『百二十條』是智者歸數,今本未自稱此數
「前行後三中,後行前七中」〔T1911 0029c28〕《成實論》T1646:「意即是業,於此中行故名業道」〔T1646 0305c14〕;又作「中三業道非業,七業亦業亦道」〔T1646 0305c16〕本論改寫語序,又增能通後世、能通七之義;不可配作十二因緣前七後三
「二乘之人,雖有無常、苦、空、無我等對治,於佛法身猶是顛倒」〔T1911 0030a09〕《究竟一乘寶性論》T1611:「如是四種顛倒對治,依如來法身,復是顛倒應知」〔T1611 0829b24〕本論把論中四對治與依法身復倒兩步壓成一句;今本該句未明列二乘之人
「《毘曇》所明七賢、七聖、四沙門果」〔T1911 0030c28〕『毘曇』是部類略稱;《止觀輔行傳弘決》只釋七賢、七聖名數目前不能由本句唯一鎖定一部今本,所指待考
「《成論》所明二十七賢聖等」〔T1911 0030c29〕《成實論》T1646:「先十八學人及九無學,是二十七人名為一切世間福田」〔T1646 0246c16〕總數相合;今本稱二十七人,本論稱二十七賢聖
「《大品》明三乘共位,乾慧乃至八地」〔T1911 0031a02〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223:「過乾慧地、性地、八人地、見地、薄地、離欲地、已作地、辟支佛地、菩薩地」〔T223 0259c12〕,後說過九地住佛地本論以乾慧乃至八地概稱三乘共位;今本具列九地後住佛地
「十五日,月光用轉顯」〔T1911 0031a10〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「譬如月光,從初一日至十五日,形色光明,漸漸增長」〔T374 0481b03〕;又說十六日至三十日漸減〔T374 0481b06〕今本以增、減說善根增長與煩惱漸滅;本論配為智德與斷德
「破世間因果,則無今世、後世」〔T1911 0031a17〕《中論》T1564 反方難說:「無有四果故,得向者亦無。若無八賢聖,則無有僧寶」〔T1564 0032b18〕,又說「空法壞因果,亦壞於罪福」〔T1564 0032c06〕本論總括為破世、出世因果之過;今本無完全相同的一句
「因緣所生法,我說即是空」〔T1911 0031b03〕《中論》T1564 偈作「眾因緣生法,我說即是無」〔T1564 0033b11〕;隨後釋文作「眾因緣生法,我說即是空」〔T1564 0033b15〕本論去眾字,並取釋文空字入偈;假名、中道二句仍依本論原形並錄
「心能為一切法作名字;若無心則無一切名字」〔T1911 0031b12〕《止觀輔行傳弘決》只說本段略引婆沙;已查數部婆沙今本,未勘得可逐字承擔全句者所指待考,不因略題即強繫《阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論》T1545
十一「所謂《僧佉》、《衛世》,九十五種邪見教生」〔T1911 0031b15〕《僧佉》《衛世》是本論明題的外學、論派名,無佛典藏號可配逐字列名,不強配佛典;兩名是世間邪見教由心生的例
十二「有一大經卷,如三千大千世界大」〔T1911 0031b18〕《究竟一乘寶性論》T1611:「佛子!譬如有一極大經卷如一三千大千世界」〔T1611 0827b04〕;又說「破彼微塵出此經卷饒益眾生」〔T1611 0827b18〕場景、結構、作用相合;本論節略諸天及大小世界等中間層
十三「以如來十二部經仰書虛空,宛然具足」〔T1911 0031b28〕《發菩提心經論》T1659:「譬如菩薩仰書虛空,悉寫如來十二部經」〔T1659 0516a24〕;後有他方淨智慧人見空中字〔T1659 0516a26–27〕本論略題作《發菩提心論》,正文典題依今本作《發菩提心經論》;本論改寫敘事主體
十四本論以破塵出卷譬說出世教,又說即攝《華嚴》之經《大方廣佛華嚴經》T278:「譬如有一經卷如一三千大千世界」〔T278 0623c27〕;又說「破彼微塵,出此經卷,饒益眾生」〔T278 0624a10〕本論明題的直接承載者是 T1611;T278 是其所承經證與平行原場景,兩層並存
十五「即攝三藏《四阿含》教」〔T1911 0031c13〕四阿含是《長阿含經》《中阿含經》《雜阿含經》《增壹阿含經》的集合稱此處是判教歸類,不作單一典籍與單一行錨
十六「即攝《方等》,生酥之經」〔T1911 0031c15〕『方等』是教類稱,不是此句可唯一指定的今本題名據實從闕,不造單一藏號
十七「即攝《大品》,熟酥之經」〔T1911 0031c16〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223本段只作判教歸攝,未引可唯一定位的逐字經句
十八「開佛知見大事,正直醍醐之經」〔T1911 0031c18〕《妙法蓮華經》T262:「欲令眾生開佛知見,使得清淨故」〔T262 0007a24〕;又說「正直捨方便,但說無上道」〔T262 0010a19〕本論合取兩處詞組,醍醐是本論自身的判教配屬;今本兩句不相鄰
十九本論由「是名乳中殺人」〔T1911 0031c21〕逐味說至「是名醍醐殺人」〔T1911 0031c26〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「譬如有人置毒乳中,乃至醍醐皆悉有毒」〔T374 0539b18〕;又說「若服醍醐亦能殺人」〔T374 0539b21〕本論把毒遍五味之譬配五類觀,並以斷二死、淨三道解釋殺人;不把所配之義倒寫成經文原說

本論未題名而由上下文或《止觀輔行傳弘決》鎖定的引線

《摩訶止觀》原句今本對讀覆核
二十「止是王三昧,一切三昧悉入其中」〔T1911 0029c08〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223:「入三昧王三昧,一切三昧悉入其中」〔T223 0217b09〕本論把佛所入三昧王三昧轉作止之總攝義,句法有別
二十一「除摩黎山,餘無栴檀」〔T1911 0029c17〕《大智度論》T1509:「諸好實語,皆從佛出;如栴檀香,出摩梨山。除摩梨山,無出栴檀」〔T1509 0066b18〕黎、梨及有無出字不同;各守其本
二十二「又大乘經中處處皆說一切地位」〔T1911 0030c25〕複數總括性指稱不是可由本句唯一定位的一部經;後文另有各部位次引線
二十三「同乘寶乘,直至道場」〔T1911 0031a09〕《妙法蓮華經》T262:「與諸菩薩,及聲聞眾,乘此寶乘,直至道場」〔T262 0015a13〕寶乘、直至道場相合;本論把四十二位承接到同乘
二十四「無句義是菩薩句義」〔T1911 0031b01〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223:「無句義是菩薩句義。何以故?阿耨多羅三藐三菩提無有義處亦無我」〔T223 0241c12〕本論節取首句,用以點空論位
二十五界內獨頭無明《阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論》T1545 說不共無明「自力而起非餘隨眠相應」〔T1545 0197a03〕是義近底據;今本術語是不共無明,不把獨頭冒充其逐字原名
二十六本論稱「十二牽連」〔T1911 0030a02〕《增壹阿含經》T125:「亦欲離十二牽連」〔T125 0767b13〕詞面與佛看病比丘的問答場景相合
二十七本論又稱「十二輪」〔T1911 0030a02〕《阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論》T1545 有「猶如車輪上下迴轉。終而復始」〔T1545 0122a06〕之近例近例不能證成稱名;《止觀輔行傳弘決》另指複數線索,仍不能唯一鎖定,所指待考
二十八「三種意生身,亦是五種意生身」〔T1911 0030a11〕《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》T670:「有三種意生身。云何為三」〔T670 0497c20〕,續列三名今本只列三名;五種是山門依義開合,不寫成經文另列五名
二十九「四種障,謂:緣、相、生、壞」〔T1911 0030a16〕《究竟一乘寶性論》T1611:「一者緣相、二者因相、三者生相、四者壞相」〔T1611 0830b02〕本論第二項只有相字,今本作因相;並錄不改
三十「毘婆舍那能破煩惱,復須奢摩他力助正知見」〔T1911 0030b15〕《大般涅槃經》T374 問:「若毘婆舍那能破煩惱,何故復修奢摩他耶」〔T374 0547c17〕本論抽取問句作正助說;今本後文另辨獨破與伴破
三十一「十二因緣即是佛性」〔T1911 0030b25〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「十二因緣名為佛性」〔T374 0524a03〕;又說「十二因緣即是佛性,佛性者即是如來」〔T374 0557a08〕核心相合;兩處各守其行錨
三十二「若作四意止說者,作心記錄不淨等」〔T1911 0030c03〕《佛說仁王般若波羅蜜經》T245:「四意止,身受心法,不淨、苦、無常、無我也」〔T245 0826c01〕四意止是四念處的異名,不另造一組法門
三十三「十六行,皆是觀門」〔T1911 0030c12〕《止觀輔行傳弘決》T1912 舊名全表:「無常苦空無我」〔T1912 0241c09〕、「集因緣生」〔T1912 0241c12〕、「盡滅妙離」〔T1912 0241c16〕、「道正迹乘」〔T1912 0241c18〕;《阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論》T1545 新名全表:「一苦二非常三空四非我」〔T1545 0408c10〕、「一因二集三生四緣」〔T1545 0408c11〕、「一滅二靜三妙四離」〔T1545 0408c12〕、「一道二如三行四出」〔T1545 0408c13〕湛然另明「舊云空。新云不淨。舊云盡。新云靜。舊名正。新云如。舊云迹。新云行舊云乘。新云出餘名並同大意可見。」〔T1912 0241c21–23〕;兩套全列並誌五處差異,不裁新舊
三十四「九種大禪、百八三昧,皆屬止攝」〔T1911 0030c19〕《菩薩地持經》T1581:「一者自性禪;二者一切禪;三者難禪;四者一切門禪;五者善人禪;六者一切行禪;七者除惱禪;八者此世他世樂禪;九者清淨禪」〔T1581 0921b29〕九名全列;不以『九種』代替枚舉
三十五百八三昧《大智度論》T1509:「《般若波羅蜜.摩訶衍義品》中,略說則有一百八三昧:初名首楞嚴三昧」〔T1509 0097a12〕名數與首名相合
三十六「十八空、十喻、五百陀羅尼,皆觀攝」〔T1911 0030c20〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223 具列十八空〔T223 0219c09〕、又有「住五百陀羅尼門」〔T223 0390b27〕;《大智度論》T1509 具列「如幻、如焰、如水中月、如虛空、如響、如犍闥婆城、如夢、如影、如鏡中像、如化」〔T1509 0101c08〕三組分屬多處,不合造一個行錨
三十七「一地即二地,二地即三地,寂滅真如,有何次位」〔T1911 0030c23〕《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》T670:「十地則為初,初則為八地」〔T670 0509c21〕,續以諸地互說而結無所有何次本論不是今本逐字引;只以同一無次場景對讀
三十八三十心與四十二位《菩薩瓔珞本業經》T1485:「四十二賢聖名門決定了義」〔T1485 1011b06〕;又說「是三十心入一乘信」〔T1485 1014b24〕本論未題經名;《止觀輔行傳弘決》明指此位表
三十九「十四般若,是因位;十五如妙覺,是果位」〔T1911 0031a11〕《佛說仁王般若波羅蜜經》T245 既有「五忍中十四忍具足」〔T245 0827a07〕,也有「其所說十四般若波羅蜜」〔T245 0828a20〕經內兩種字面皆存;不把十五冒充經文另列的第十五般若
四十「開、示、悟、入佛之知見」〔T1911 0031a08〕《妙法蓮華經》T262 自「欲令眾生開佛知見」〔T262 0007a24〕起,續列示、悟、入本論改為四個名詞式並列
四十一「文字性離,即是解脫」〔T1911 0031a15〕《維摩詰所說經》T475:「文字性離,無有文字,是則解脫」〔T475 0540c19〕本論節引;不由文字性離推出文字無用
四十二「治內之留滯,破外以閑邪」〔T1911 0031a26〕《中論》T1564 卷首僧叡序:「《百論》治外以閑邪,斯文袪內以流滯」〔T1564 0001b01〕本論倒置兩半並改治、祛等字;僧叡序不是龍樹偈文

四、輔行釋要〔鏡〕

《止觀輔行傳弘決》先把疑問分成名與體兩層:本論名目雖略,止觀之體並不因此不周。治病得穴、得珠王兩譬,分顯止寂諸法、觀照於理;《大品》所說一切皆學與一切入中,則作經證。

開六意時,湛然明判「實體止觀以為能攝。事理等六以為所攝」〔T1912 0239b17〕。六意的文字雖分六章,章法卻同時有次第與不次第兩義,而歸趣只在圓頓止觀;故說「此之六章。文六義二。各有次第及不次第。意唯在一」〔T1912 0239c07〕。別釋六意可從次第讀,也可從不次第讀;末段六法互攝則專顯不次第。

攝惑一節有一道重要的校讀界線。本論把《成實論》語接在十二因緣之後,但《止觀輔行傳弘決》直斥「人未見論。秖見續在十二緣後。便作十二因緣釋之」〔T1912 0240a21〕,明其正意是以意三、身口七解三業互通,不是把前七、後三配十二支。界外雖同樣使用相應、獨頭之名,其惑體與界內不同;意生身經名只有三,天台依教位開義可成五,故說「名唯有三義開成五」〔T1912 0240c26〕。

攝行一節,慧行、行行雖被本論標為正、助,《止觀輔行傳弘決》仍補明「其實定慧俱是正修。慈等事觀方名為助」〔T1912 0241b19〕。這使奢摩他不被一概降為輔助,四教二行也可依空、假、中三觀統攝。

攝位一節,湛然以真、俗兩面和會無位與有位:所引無位只約圓理一邊,其他經文多明次位;若據無位撥去位次,便連因果一併撥無。因此他說「經云無位唯此一文。上下諸文盡明次位」〔T1912 0242b07〕,又直指出「汝言無位即無因果」〔T1912 0243a15〕。文字性離不礙說位,說位也不把位執成自性。

攝教一節,把凡有指示、分判、辨說者都納入教,故世間邪正之說與出世偏圓之教,皆可從心起而受止觀統攝。破塵出卷約眾生心中法門被覆而後顯,仰寫空經又兼佛先自證而教他,能化、所化兩意互相成就。

末段六法互攝不是重複前面的相生次第。《止觀輔行傳弘決》說「前六但似相待。故須更明絕待之相」〔T1912 0245a05〕,再逐門解釋一理、一惑、一智、一行、一位、一教如何各具餘五;總結為「此六法不出寂照不思議中一妙止觀」〔T1912 0245b19〕,並判「此之六法即是前來不次第體」〔T1912 0245b22〕。

《止觀義例》又以「借名略義。如攝法中及識藥等」〔T1913 0447c09〕說明本章借諸法名相顯其相狀,不在一章內窮釋每一名;《止觀大意》則以「明體攝法。判法偏圓此四並在第三卷中」〔T1914 0459c29〕標明卷次綱要。

五、諸家異釋

本單元的直接後世承受,集中在『灸病得穴』及一境攝多法的譬喻結構。

知禮《四明十義書》T1936 說「故云伐樹得根。灸病得穴。乃是去其千枝百脈。唯取一根一穴。立所觀境」〔T1936 0835c05〕,又說「良由灸病得穴故。百病自差」〔T1936 0841b22〕。他把本章的一穴攝眾病轉用於所觀境之論辯;這是後世場景的承用,不倒寫成智者本章已在回答宋代爭題。

懷則《天台傳佛心印記》T1938 先說「的取識陰為所觀境。如去丈就尺去尺就寸。是為總無明心。若就總明別即第六識」〔T1938 0934a22〕,隨後承用「如伐樹得根。灸病得穴」〔T1938 0934a24〕,以一境任運攝法。元代闡釋的所觀境判語仍只屬後世見證。

《四明尊者教行錄》T1937 以攝法、灸病、十二牽連、破塵出卷、仰寫空經等標記檢索並讀其上下文,未勘得同時具備本單元獨特標記與相同場景結構的直接扣合文;近似句「同異與相攝云何得其意」〔T1937 0877b19〕位於觀心、觀色問答,故不列為直接承受。此只是所查標記與命中上下文的限界報告,不宣稱全書沒有任何間接承受。山家、山外後世論爭於此只誌其承用,不判是非。

六、術語

本論用法《止觀輔行傳弘決》釋讀
攝法「止觀總持,遍收諸法」〔T1911 0029c03〕止觀之實體是能攝,理、惑、智、行、位、教是所攝
「理是諦法」〔T1911 0029c15〕;權實之外無別理四教從能詮之教開,所詮之理只收權、實二門
「以迷諦故,起生死惑。迷,即無明」〔T1911 0029c19〕依迷權、實二理,分界內、界外惑;名雖有同,體不相同
相應、獨頭與見思諸使合名相應,不相應名獨頭界內獨頭以不共無明不與使俱釋;界外須另守其體
三道「煩惱通業;業通苦;苦通煩惱」〔T1911 0029c27〕道從三者展轉互通立名,障則從遮蔽聖道立名
意生身本論並說三種、五種《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》只有三名;五是天台依教位開義
慧行、行行慧行是正行,行行是助行定、慧皆是正修,慈等緣事之觀才從助行說
無位、有位無生無滅、正慧無所得,而三道淨故於無為中有差別約真說無位,寄俗說有位;二者不相妨
世、出世名字悉從心起凡有指示、分判、辨說皆名教,故邪正偏圓都可納入
破塵出卷破開覆蔽微塵,使經卷顯出約所化眾生心中法門被覆而顯
仰寫空經經字書於虛空,後人得見、書取而示眾又兼佛先自得、再以所證教他
次第、不次第六意依理至教相生;末段六法各攝其餘別釋可含二義,互攝專顯不次第與絕待

七、譬喻、互讀與承衍

本單元以兩個一攝多的譬喻起筆。治病若得穴,眾患皆除;得到珠王,眾寶皆獲。止寂諸法如前一譬,觀照於理如後一譬,先用最短的形象回答『二名何以周攝』。摩黎山外無栴檀,則顯權、實之外別無第三理。

攝惑以病、藥互照:界內惑覆真諦是病,從假入空止觀是藥;知病可識藥,觀藥也能反知所治之病。攝行以足隨眼說正、助二行;有解而無行,終究無所至。攝位又以月光增、減顯智德與斷德,說明無生無所得不妨有惑淨深淺。

攝教的兩大意象,一是微塵中包藏三千大千世界經卷,破塵而使經卷利益眾生;一是十二部經寫在虛空,後人見字而書取示導。前者從覆蔽中顯出本具智慧,後者從空中之文顯出讀取、傳示;兩譬都把『教從心起』寫成可以看見的動作。五味置毒的譬又顯不定:名稱與階段雖變,作用不失;本論轉以五類觀說斷二死、淨三道。

《止觀義例》以攝法為借名略義、開合歸一的範例,《止觀大意》把明體、攝法、偏圓同繫第三卷,二書可作唐代綱要互讀。宋知禮與元懷則再承『灸病得穴』,轉入揀取所觀境而任運攝法;這條承衍顯示同一譬喻如何移入後世觀心論域,而不改寫智者原章的當下所問。

全章末後由六意相生轉為六法互攝:一理攝惑、智、行、位、教,一惑乃至一教也都各攝其餘。前段如沿次第展開一張法門圖,末段則令圖中任何一點都可通向全體,最後仍歸止觀二名攝盡。

八、校本定位

本編以大正藏 T1911《摩訶止觀》為單一底本。讀者原典每逢換頁,於該頁第一段首標行錨;行錨取段首字前最近的大正行標。異讀只列大正校記所見原字,不判優劣。表中【大】為大正底本,【甲】為德川刊島地大等氏藏本,【校】為電子佛典校訂;『無』表示該見本缺字。

行錨採字異讀與互見
0029c04灸【校】炙【大】;校記互見《四明十義書》0835c06、《天台傳佛心印記》0934a24
0029c19生死【大】無【甲】
0030c22廣【大】廣云云【甲】
0031b15佉》、【校】法【大】;變體落在外學名末字及標點位置
0031c26二【大】取二【甲】
0032a06教【校】卷【大】;經教、經卷兩形分層並錄

0029c02 另有宮本卷終、卷首之原注,但不屬大正校記異讀,故不混入上表。六條校記已全列;後世互見只作校讀線索,不以多數見本自行定字。

This unit is the fourth of the Ten Broad Chapters. Zhiyi first breaks the doubt that “the names calming and contemplation are concise and do not embrace Dharmas comprehensively.” He then opens the six intents principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching and explains under each how the three calmings and three contemplations embrace throughout. Finally, each of the six Dharmas is made to embrace the other five, moving from successive opening and gathering into the mutual inclusion of one Dharma. The unit begins with 「第四、明攝法者」 tr. “Fourth, clarifying the embracing of Dharmas”〔T1911 0029c02〕 and ends with the sentence at 0032a12 concluding that one teaching embraces the other five.

1. Doctrinal-Outline Placement

The Ten Broad Chapters are Great Purport, Explaining the Name, Essence and Characteristics, Embracing the Dharmas, Partial and Perfect, Preparatory Means, Proper Contemplation, Retribution and Result, Giving Rise to Teaching, and Purport and Return. Embracing the Dharmas follows Essence and Characteristics and precedes Partial and Perfect. Its core question is: if calming and contemplation are only two concise names, how can they embrace every Dharma? The author first answers generally with two similes—treating illness by finding the point and obtaining the jewel king—then explains broadly through six intents.

According to the movement of the treatise and the line-by-line correspondences in the Zhiguan Fuxing Chuanhong Jue, the unit divides into fifteen sections:

SectionRange in the treatiseContentFuxing correspondence
10029c02–0029c08Reason for coming, statement of doubt, general answer, and two similes for that which embraces0239b07–0239b16
20029c08–0029c14Opening the six intents and their sequence0239b17–0239c10
30029c15–0029c18Three calmings and three contemplations embrace all principle0239c11–0239c13
40029c18–0030a05Delusion within the realms through confusion about provisional principle, twelve links, and three paths0239c13–0240b18
50030a06–0030a22Delusion beyond the realms through confusion about real principle, mind-made bodies, and four obstructions0240b19–0241a07
60030a22–0030b08Distinguishing sharp and dull faculties in mind-made bodies0241a07–0241a23
70030b09–0030b12Three contemplations embrace all wisdom0241a23–0241b14
80030b12–0030b26Primary and auxiliary practices; wisdom-practice and practice-practice in the Four Teachings0241b14–0241c01
90030b27–0030c22General inclusion of meditation, factors of the path, six perfections, and other gates of practice0241c02–0242a24
100030c23–0030c27General discussion of no stations and stations0242a25–0242c05
110030c27–0031a13Stations in the Four Teachings0242c05–0243a08
120031a13–0031b11Breaking attachment to no stations and using the four clauses of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā to embrace stations0243a09–0243c11
130031b11–0031b17Names and teachings of the world arise from mind0243c12–0244b07
140031b17–0032a06World-transcending teachings, the Four Teachings and five periods, and indeterminate teaching all arise from mind0244b08–0244c22
150032a06–0032a12Each of the six Dharmas embraces the other five0244c23–0245b23

The author first clarifies how the six intents give rise to one another. Principle constantly abides, but sentient beings become confused about principle and give rise to delusion. They contemplate in accord with principle, hence wisdom. With understanding, practice is established. Through practice, stations are realized. When stations are fulfilled, others are taught. The final passage no longer follows this before and after but says that one principle through one teaching each completely embraces the remaining five Dharmas.

2. Formation and Transmission

This unit continues the account in Origins of one summer at Yuquan, Zhiyi’s teaching, Guanding’s record, and the incompleteness of the extant transmission. The threefold evidence of incompleteness and the history of the composite recension are detailed in Origins. Here they are linked only as the unit’s source, not unfolded again or used to infer the cause of incompleteness. The opening preface of the Fuxing is signed 「君山除饉男普門子敬序」 tr. “Preface respectfully composed by Pumen, the man of reduced rations from Junshan”〔T1912 0141b06〕, while the body is separately signed 「唐毘陵沙門湛然述」 tr. “Composed by the śramaṇa Zhanran of Piling in the Tang”〔T1912 0141b18〕. Prefacer and commentator belong to different layers and cannot be conflated as Zhanran’s self-preface.

3. Verification of the Scriptures and Treatises Cited

In the treatise’s sequence, this section lists every identifiable quotation, title reference, and scriptural or treatise setting. Where Zhiyi’s wording differs from the extant text, both are recorded side by side without adjudication. Where a phrase names a class of texts or teachings or cannot be uniquely tied to one extant work, that fact is stated rather than forcing one canon number.

Scriptures, Treatises, and Teaching Classes Explicitly Named in the Treatise

No.Original wording in the Mohe ZhiguanExtant comparisonVerification
1「《大品》有百二十條及一切法,皆言當學般若」 tr. “The Great Perfection of Wisdom has 120 items and all Dharmas, all saying one should study prajñā”〔T1911 0029c06〕The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, T223, has 「欲以一切種智知一切法,當習行般若波羅蜜」 tr. “If one wishes to know all Dharmas through omniscience of all aspects, one should cultivate prajñāpāramitā”〔T223 0218c18〕, and later repeatedly has 「當學般若波羅蜜」 tr. “one should study prajñāpāramitā”〔T223 0219a27〕The extant text verifies that everything desired returns to studying prajñā. “120 items” is Zhiyi’s enumeration; the extant text does not call itself that number
2「前行後三中,後行前七中」 tr. “The former operate within the latter three, and the latter operate within the former seven”〔T1911 0029c28〕The Satyasiddhi Śāstra, T1646, has 「意即是業,於此中行故名業道」 tr. “Intention is itself karma; because it operates within these, they are called paths of karma”〔T1646 0305c14〕, and 「中三業道非業,七業亦業亦道」 tr. “The middle three paths of karma are not karma, while the seven are both karma and path”〔T1646 0305c16〕The treatise rewrites the order and adds the meanings that the former connect to the latter three and the latter to the seven; it cannot be assigned to the first seven and last three of the twelve links
3「二乘之人,雖有無常、苦、空、無我等對治,於佛法身猶是顛倒」 tr. “Although people of the Two Vehicles possess counteractions such as impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and non-self, with respect to the Buddha’s Dharma body they remain inverted”〔T1911 0030a09〕The Ratnagotravibhāga, T1611, has 「如是四種顛倒對治,依如來法身,復是顛倒應知」 tr. “Know that these four counteractions to inversion are again inversions when based upon the Tathāgata’s Dharma body”〔T1611 0829b24〕The treatise compresses the four counteractions and renewed inversion with respect to Dharma body into one sentence; the extant sentence does not explicitly name people of the Two Vehicles
4「《毘曇》所明七賢、七聖、四沙門果」 tr. “The seven worthies, seven sages, and four fruits of a śramaṇa clarified by the Abhidharma”〔T1911 0030c28〕“Abhidharma” is an abbreviated name for a class of works; the Fuxing explains only the enumerations of seven worthies and seven sagesThis sentence cannot presently be tied uniquely to one extant work; referent unresolved
5「《成論》所明二十七賢聖等」 tr. “The twenty-seven worthies and sages and others clarified by the Satyasiddhi”〔T1911 0030c29〕The Satyasiddhi Śāstra, T1646, has 「先十八學人及九無學,是二十七人名為一切世間福田」 tr. “The preceding eighteen trainees and nine beyond training are twenty-seven persons called fields of merit for the whole world”〔T1646 0246c16〕The total agrees; the extant text says twenty-seven persons, the treatise twenty-seven worthies and sages
6「《大品》明三乘共位,乾慧乃至八地」 tr. “The Great Perfection of Wisdom clarifies the shared stations of the Three Vehicles, from the ground of dry wisdom through the eighth ground”〔T1911 0031a02〕The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, T223, has 「過乾慧地、性地、八人地、見地、薄地、離欲地、已作地、辟支佛地、菩薩地」 tr. “Passing beyond the ground of dry wisdom, nature ground, ground of eight persons, ground of seeing, ground of attenuation, ground free from desire, accomplished ground, pratyekabuddha ground, and bodhisattva ground”〔T223 0259c12〕, then says to pass beyond nine grounds and abide in the Buddha groundThe treatise summarizes the shared stations of the Three Vehicles as dry wisdom through the eighth ground; the extant text lists nine grounds and then the Buddha ground
7「十五日,月光用轉顯」 tr. “By the fifteenth day, the function of moonlight becomes increasingly manifest”〔T1911 0031a10〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra, T374, has 「譬如月光,從初一日至十五日,形色光明,漸漸增長」 tr. “Like moonlight, from the first through the fifteenth day its form and brightness gradually increase”〔T374 0481b03〕, and says that from the sixteenth through thirtieth day they gradually diminish〔T374 0481b06〕The extant text uses increase and decrease for wholesome roots growing and afflictions gradually ceasing; the treatise assigns them to the virtues of wisdom and severance
8「破世間因果,則無今世、後世」 tr. “If worldly cause and result are broken, there is no present or future life”〔T1911 0031a17〕The objection in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, T1564, says 「無有四果故,得向者亦無。若無八賢聖,則無有僧寶」 tr. “Because the four fruits do not exist, those who attain and approach do not exist. If the eight worthies and sages do not exist, there is no jewel of Saṅgha”〔T1564 0032b18〕, and 「空法壞因果,亦壞於罪福」 tr. “The Dharma of emptiness destroys cause and result and also destroys offense and merit”〔T1564 0032c06〕The treatise summarizes the fault of breaking worldly and world-transcending cause and result; the extant text has no completely identical sentence
9「因緣所生法,我說即是空」 tr. “Dharmas arising from causes and conditions, I say, are emptiness itself”〔T1911 0031b03〕The verse in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, T1564, has 「眾因緣生法,我說即是無」 tr. “Dharmas arising from many causes and conditions, I say, are absence itself”〔T1564 0033b11〕; its prose has 「眾因緣生法,我說即是空」 tr. “Dharmas arising from many causes and conditions, I say, are emptiness itself”〔T1564 0033b15〕The treatise omits the graph “many” and takes the prose reading emptiness into the verse; the clauses provisional names and Middle Way are likewise preserved in the treatise’s own form
10「心能為一切法作名字;若無心則無一切名字」 tr. “Mind can make names for all Dharmas; without mind there would be no names for any Dharma”〔T1911 0031b12〕The Fuxing says only that this passage briefly cites a Vibhāṣā; several extant Vibhāṣā works were examined without finding a verbatim sentence that can bear the whole quotationReferent unresolved; the abbreviated title is not used to force an attribution to T1545
11「所謂《僧佉》、《衛世》,九十五種邪見教生」 tr. “Thus the Sāṃkhya and Vaiśeṣika and the ninety-five kinds of teaching of wrong views arise”〔T1911 0031b15〕Sāṃkhya and Vaiśeṣika are non-Buddhist schools and treatise traditions explicitly named in the base text; no Buddhist canon number appliesNames are listed verbatim without forcing a Buddhist source; they exemplify worldly teachings of wrong views arising from mind
12「有一大經卷,如三千大千世界大」 tr. “There is one great scripture scroll as large as the great trichiliocosm”〔T1911 0031b18〕The Ratnagotravibhāga, T1611, has 「佛子!譬如有一極大經卷如一三千大千世界」 tr. “Child of the Buddha, it is like one immense scripture scroll the size of a great trichiliocosm”〔T1611 0827b04〕, and 「破彼微塵出此經卷饒益眾生」 tr. “Break open that mote, bring forth this scripture scroll, and benefit sentient beings”〔T1611 0827b18〕Setting, structure, and function correspond; the treatise abbreviates the intermediate levels concerning devas and worlds of different sizes
13「以如來十二部經仰書虛空,宛然具足」 tr. “Write the Tathāgata’s twelve divisions of scripture upward upon space, clearly complete”〔T1911 0031b28〕The Fa Putixin Jing Lun (Treatise on the Scripture of Arousing the Mind of Awakening), T1659, has 「譬如菩薩仰書虛空,悉寫如來十二部經」 tr. “It is like a bodhisattva writing upward upon space, copying all twelve divisions of the Tathāgata’s scripture”〔T1659 0516a24〕, followed by a person of pure wisdom from another region seeing the graphs in space〔T1659 0516a26–27〕The treatise abbreviates the title as Fa Putixin Lun, while the extant title is Fa Putixin Jing Lun; the treatise rewrites the narrative subject
14The treatise uses the simile of breaking a mote and bringing forth the scroll for world-transcending teaching, then says it includes the scriptures of the AvataṃsakaThe Avataṃsaka Sūtra, T278, has 「譬如有一經卷如一三千大千世界」 tr. “It is like one scripture scroll the size of a great trichiliocosm”〔T278 0623c27〕 and 「破彼微塵,出此經卷,饒益眾生」 tr. “Break open that mote, bring forth this scripture scroll, and benefit sentient beings”〔T278 0624a10〕T1611 is the direct bearer explicitly named by the treatise; T278 is the scriptural witness and parallel original setting that it inherits. Both layers remain
15「即攝三藏《四阿含》教」 tr. “It embraces the Tripiṭaka Teaching of the Four Āgamas”〔T1911 0031c13〕“Four Āgamas” collectively names the Dīrgha, Madhyama, Saṃyukta, and Ekottarika ĀgamasA teaching-classification assignment, not one work and one line anchor
16「即攝《方等》,生酥之經」 tr. “It embraces the Vaipulya scriptures of raw cream”〔T1911 0031c15〕Vaipulya is a teaching class, not an extant title uniquely specified by this sentenceThe gap is recorded rather than a canon number fabricated
17「即攝《大品》,熟酥之經」 tr. “It embraces the Great Perfection of Wisdom scriptures of clarified cream”〔T1911 0031c16〕The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, T223This passage assigns a teaching class and contains no verbatim sentence with a uniquely locatable line
18「開佛知見大事,正直醍醐之經」 tr. “The scripture of the one great work of opening the Buddha’s knowledge and vision, upright ghee”〔T1911 0031c18〕The Lotus, T262, has 「欲令眾生開佛知見,使得清淨故」 tr. “Wishing to cause sentient beings to open the Buddha’s knowledge and vision and attain purity”〔T262 0007a24〕 and 「正直捨方便,但說無上道」 tr. “Uprightly cast aside skillful means and teach only the unsurpassed path”〔T262 0010a19〕The treatise combines phrases from two locations; assigning ghee is its own teaching classification, and the two extant sentences are not adjacent
19From 「是名乳中殺人」 tr. “This is called killing a person in milk”〔T1911 0031c21〕 through 「是名醍醐殺人」 tr. “This is called killing a person in ghee”〔T1911 0031c26〕, the treatise proceeds flavor by flavorThe Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra, T374, has 「譬如有人置毒乳中,乃至醍醐皆悉有毒」 tr. “It is like someone placing poison in milk: through to ghee, all are poisonous”〔T374 0539b18〕 and 「若服醍醐亦能殺人」 tr. “If one consumes the ghee, it can also kill”〔T374 0539b21〕The treatise assigns the poison-through-five-flavors simile to five kinds of contemplation and explains killing as severing the two deaths and purifying the three paths; those assignments are not written backward as the scripture’s wording

Leads Not Named by the Treatise but Secured by Context or the Zhiguan Fuxing Chuanhong Jue

No.Original wording in the Mohe ZhiguanExtant comparisonVerification
20「止是王三昧,一切三昧悉入其中」 tr. “Calming is the king samādhi; all samādhis enter within it”〔T1911 0029c08〕The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, T223, has 「入三昧王三昧,一切三昧悉入其中」 tr. “Entering the samādhi-king samādhi, all samādhis enter within it”〔T223 0217b09〕The treatise turns the samādhi-king samādhi entered by the Buddha into the comprehensive meaning of calming; the syntax differs
21「除摩黎山,餘無栴檀」 tr. “Apart from Mount Moli, there is no sandalwood elsewhere”〔T1911 0029c17〕The Treatise on the Great Perfection of Wisdom, T1509, has 「諸好實語,皆從佛出;如栴檀香,出摩梨山。除摩梨山,無出栴檀」 tr. “All excellent and true words come from the Buddha, just as the fragrance of sandalwood comes from Mount Moli. Apart from Mount Moli, no sandalwood comes forth”〔T1509 0066b18〕The graphs and and the presence or absence of differ; each text retains its own reading
22「又大乘經中處處皆說一切地位」 tr. “Moreover, throughout the Mahāyāna scriptures all stations are taught”〔T1911 0030c25〕A plural, comprehensive referenceThis sentence cannot uniquely locate one scripture; the ensuing passage contains separate leads for stations in particular works
23「同乘寶乘,直至道場」 tr. “Together they mount the jeweled vehicle and go directly to the place of awakening”〔T1911 0031a09〕The Lotus, T262, has 「與諸菩薩,及聲聞眾,乘此寶乘,直至道場」 tr. “Together with the bodhisattvas and the assembly of śrāvakas, they mount this jeweled vehicle and go directly to the place of awakening”〔T262 0015a13〕“Jeweled vehicle” and “directly to the place of awakening” agree; the treatise connects the forty-two stations to mounting together
24「無句義是菩薩句義」 tr. “No meaning of a phrase is the bodhisattva’s meaning of a phrase”〔T1911 0031b01〕The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, T223, has 「無句義是菩薩句義。何以故?阿耨多羅三藐三菩提無有義處亦無我」 tr. “No meaning of a phrase is the bodhisattva’s meaning of a phrase. Why? Unsurpassed complete awakening has no locus of meaning and no self”〔T223 0241c12〕The treatise excerpts the first sentence to mark the empty discussion of stations
25The solitary-head ignorance within the realmsThe Mahāvibhāṣā, T1545, says of unassociated ignorance, 「自力而起非餘隨眠相應」 tr. “It arises through its own power and is not associated with other latent tendencies”〔T1545 0197a03〕This is evidence close in meaning; the extant term is “unassociated ignorance,” and “solitary-head” is not passed off as its verbatim original name
26The treatise calls it 「十二牽連」 tr. “the twelve entangling connections”〔T1911 0030a02〕The Ekottarika Āgama, T125, has 「亦欲離十二牽連」 tr. “also wishing to leave the twelve entangling connections”〔T125 0767b13〕The wording and the setting of the Buddha’s dialogue with a sick monk agree
27The treatise also calls it 「十二輪」 tr. “the twelve wheels”〔T1911 0030a02〕The Mahāvibhāṣā, T1545, has the near example 「猶如車輪上下迴轉。終而復始」 tr. “Like a cartwheel revolving up and down, ending and beginning again”〔T1545 0122a06〕A near example cannot prove the name; the Fuxing points to several other leads, but they still do not secure a unique source. Referent unresolved
28「三種意生身,亦是五種意生身」 tr. “The three kinds of mind-made body are also the five kinds of mind-made body”〔T1911 0030a11〕The Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra, T670, has 「有三種意生身。云何為三」 tr. “There are three kinds of mind-made body. What are the three?”〔T670 0497c20〕 and continues by listing their three namesThe extant scripture lists only three names; Tiantai opens them into five by meaning and station, without rewriting the scripture as separately listing five
29「四種障,謂:緣、相、生、壞」 tr. “Four kinds of obstruction: condition, characteristic, arising, and destruction”〔T1911 0030a16〕The Ratnagotravibhāga, T1611, has 「一者緣相、二者因相、三者生相、四者壞相」 tr. “First, the characteristic of conditions; second, the characteristic of causes; third, the characteristic of arising; fourth, the characteristic of destruction”〔T1611 0830b02〕The treatise’s second item is only , while the extant text reads 因相; both are recorded without alteration
30「毘婆舍那能破煩惱,復須奢摩他力助正知見」 tr. “Vipaśyanā can break afflictions, yet the power of śamatha is also needed to assist right knowledge and vision”〔T1911 0030b15〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra, T374, asks 「若毘婆舍那能破煩惱,何故復修奢摩他耶」 tr. “If vipaśyanā can break afflictions, why cultivate śamatha as well?”〔T374 0547c17〕The treatise extracts the question for its discussion of primary and auxiliary; the extant text later distinguishes breaking alone from breaking with a companion
31「十二因緣即是佛性」 tr. “The twelve links of dependent origination are themselves buddha-nature”〔T1911 0030b25〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra, T374, has 「十二因緣名為佛性」 tr. “The twelve links of dependent origination are called buddha-nature”〔T374 0524a03〕 and 「十二因緣即是佛性,佛性者即是如來」 tr. “The twelve links of dependent origination are themselves buddha-nature; buddha-nature is itself the Tathāgata”〔T374 0557a08〕The core agrees; each of the two passages retains its own line anchor
32「若作四意止說者,作心記錄不淨等」 tr. “If explained in terms of the Four Intentional Calmings, form the mental recollection of impurity and the others”〔T1911 0030c03〕The Scripture of the Prajñāpāramitā for Humane Kings, T245, has 「四意止,身受心法,不淨、苦、無常、無我也」 tr. “The Four Intentional Calmings—body, feeling, mind, and dharmas—are impurity, suffering, impermanence, and non-self”〔T245 0826c01〕“Four Intentional Calmings” is an alternate name for the Four Establishments of Mindfulness, not a separate set of practices
33「十六行,皆是觀門」 tr. “The sixteen aspects are all gates of contemplation”〔T1911 0030c12〕The Fuxing, T1912, gives the complete old-name lists: 「無常苦空無我」 tr. “impermanent, suffering, empty, non-self”〔T1912 0241c09〕, 「集因緣生」 tr. “origin, cause, condition, production”〔T1912 0241c12〕, 「盡滅妙離」 tr. “exhaustion, cessation, wondrous, release”〔T1912 0241c16〕, and 「道正迹乘」 tr. “path, right, track, vehicle”〔T1912 0241c18〕. The Mahāvibhāṣā, T1545, gives the complete new-name lists: 「一苦二非常三空四非我」 tr. “first suffering, second impermanent, third empty, fourth non-self”〔T1545 0408c10〕, 「一因二集三生四緣」 tr. “first cause, second origin, third production, fourth condition”〔T1545 0408c11〕, 「一滅二靜三妙四離」 tr. “first cessation, second peace, third wondrous, fourth release”〔T1545 0408c12〕, and 「一道二如三行四出」 tr. “first path, second according-with, third practice, fourth emergence”〔T1545 0408c13〕Zhanran separately states, 「舊云空。新云不淨。舊云盡。新云靜。舊名正。新云如。舊云迹。新云行舊云乘。新云出餘名並同大意可見。」 tr. “The old says empty; the new says impure. The old says exhaustion; the new says peace. The old names right; the new says according-with. The old says track; the new says practice. The old says vehicle; the new says emergence. The remaining names are the same, and the broad purport can be seen”〔T1912 0241c21–23〕. Both complete sets and their five differences are recorded without adjudicating old and new
34「九種大禪、百八三昧,皆屬止攝」 tr. “The nine kinds of great dhyāna and the 108 samādhis all belong within the embrace of calming”〔T1911 0030c19〕The Bodhisattvabhūmi Sūtra, T1581, has 「一者自性禪;二者一切禪;三者難禪;四者一切門禪;五者善人禪;六者一切行禪;七者除惱禪;八者此世他世樂禪;九者清淨禪」 tr. “First, intrinsic dhyāna; second, all dhyāna; third, difficult dhyāna; fourth, dhyāna of every gate; fifth, dhyāna of the good person; sixth, dhyāna of every practice; seventh, dhyāna removing distress; eighth, dhyāna of happiness in this and other worlds; ninth, pure dhyāna”〔T1581 0921b29〕All nine names are listed; “nine kinds” does not substitute for their enumeration
35The 108 samādhisThe Treatise on the Great Perfection of Wisdom, T1509, has 「《般若波羅蜜.摩訶衍義品》中,略說則有一百八三昧:初名首楞嚴三昧」 tr. “In the Mahāyāna Meaning Chapter of the Prajñāpāramitā, an abbreviated account has 108 samādhis: the first is named Śūraṃgama Samādhi”〔T1509 0097a12〕The number and first name agree
36「十八空、十喻、五百陀羅尼,皆觀攝」 tr. “The eighteen emptinesses, ten similes, and five hundred dhāraṇīs are all embraced by contemplation”〔T1911 0030c20〕The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, T223, lists all eighteen emptinesses〔T223 0219c09〕 and also has 「住五百陀羅尼門」 tr. “dwelling in five hundred dhāraṇī gates”〔T223 0390b27〕. The Treatise on the Great Perfection of Wisdom, T1509, lists 「如幻、如焰、如水中月、如虛空、如響、如犍闥婆城、如夢、如影、如鏡中像、如化」 tr. “like an illusion, like a mirage, like the moon in water, like space, like an echo, like a gandharva city, like a dream, like a shadow, like an image in a mirror, like a transformation”〔T1509 0101c08〕The three sets occur in multiple places and are not made into one fabricated line anchor
37「一地即二地,二地即三地,寂滅真如,有何次位」 tr. “One ground is itself the second ground, and the second is itself the third; in quiescent true thusness, what successive stations could there be?”〔T1911 0030c23〕The Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra, T670, has 「十地則為初,初則為八地」 tr. “The tenth ground is the first, and the first is the eighth”〔T670 0509c21〕, continuing through the mutual statement of grounds and concluding that where there is nothing possessed, what succession could there beThe treatise is not a verbatim quotation of the extant text; they are cross-read only within the same scene of no succession
38The thirty minds and forty-two stationsThe Sūtra of the Bodhisattva’s Garland of the Primary Deeds, T1485, has 「四十二賢聖名門決定了義」 tr. “The named gate of the forty-two worthies and sages is the definitive complete meaning”〔T1485 1011b06〕 and 「是三十心入一乘信」 tr. “These thirty minds enter faith in the One Vehicle”〔T1485 1014b24〕The treatise does not name the scripture; the Fuxing explicitly points to this station table
39「十四般若,是因位;十五如妙覺,是果位」 tr. “The fourteen prajñās are causal stations; the fifteenth, such as wondrous awakening, is the resultant station”〔T1911 0031a11〕The Scripture of the Prajñāpāramitā for Humane Kings, T245, has both 「五忍中十四忍具足」 tr. “within the five endurances the fourteen endurances are complete”〔T245 0827a07〕 and 「其所說十四般若波羅蜜」 tr. “the fourteen prajñāpāramitās it teaches”〔T245 0828a20〕Both wordings occur within the scripture; the fifteenth is not passed off as another fifteenth prajñā separately listed in the scripture
40「開、示、悟、入佛之知見」 tr. “opening, showing, awakening to, and entering the Buddha’s knowledge and vision”〔T1911 0031a08〕The Lotus, T262, begins with 「欲令眾生開佛知見」 tr. “wishing to cause sentient beings to open the Buddha’s knowledge and vision”〔T262 0007a24〕 and continues by listing showing, awakening to, and enteringThe treatise recasts the four as parallel nominal expressions
41「文字性離,即是解脫」 tr. “The nature of written words is free; this itself is liberation”〔T1911 0031a15〕The Vimalakīrti Sūtra, T475, has 「文字性離,無有文字,是則解脫」 tr. “The nature of written words is free; there are no written words. This is liberation”〔T475 0540c19〕The treatise excerpts the passage; freedom in the nature of written words is not made to imply that written words are useless
42「治內之留滯,破外以閑邪」 tr. “Treat inner obstructions and break what is external so as to guard against error”〔T1911 0031a26〕Sengrui’s preface at the beginning of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, T1564, has 「《百論》治外以閑邪,斯文袪內以流滯」 tr. “The Śataśāstra treats what is external so as to guard against error; this text dispels what is internal so as to make obstructions flow”〔T1564 0001b01〕The treatise reverses the two halves and changes graphs including and ; Sengrui’s preface is not a verse by Nāgārjuna

4. Essential Explanations from the Fuxing [the Mirror]

The Zhiguan Fuxing Chuanhong Jue first divides the doubt into two levels, name and essence: though the treatise’s names are concise, the essence of calming-and-contemplation is not thereby incomplete. The two similes—treating illness by finding the point and obtaining the jewel king—respectively disclose calming as quiescing all Dharmas and contemplation as illuminating principle. The Great Perfection of Wisdom’s “study everything” and “everything enters within” then supply scriptural warrant.

When opening the six intents, Zhanran makes the explicit judgment 「實體止觀以為能攝。事理等六以為所攝」 tr. “Take the real essence, calming-and-contemplation, as that which embraces; take the six—principle, phenomena, and the rest—as what is embraced”〔T1912 0239b17〕. Although the words of the six intents divide into six chapters, their organization bears both successive and nonsuccessive meanings, while their purport lies only in perfect-and-sudden calming-and-contemplation. Thus he says, 「此之六章。文六義二。各有次第及不次第。意唯在一」 tr. “These six chapters are six in text and two in meaning. Each has the successive and the nonsuccessive; their purport lies solely in one”〔T1912 0239c07〕. The separate explanations of the six intents may be read successively or nonsuccessively; the final mutual inclusion of the six Dharmas specifically reveals the nonsuccessive.

The section embracing delusion contains an important boundary for textual reading. The treatise places wording from the Satyasiddhi Śāstra after the twelve links, but the Fuxing directly rebukes, 「人未見論。秖見續在十二緣後。便作十二因緣釋之」 tr. “People have not seen the treatise. They merely see that this follows after the twelve links, and thereupon explain it as the twelve links of dependent origination”〔T1912 0240a21〕. Its proper meaning is that the three of intention and the seven of body and speech explain the intercommunication of the three kinds of karma; it does not assign the former seven and latter three to the twelve links. Although the same names “associated” and “solitary-head” occur beyond the realms, the essence of those delusions differs from that within the realms. The scripture has only three names for mind-made bodies, while Tiantai may open their meanings through teachings and stations into five; hence 「名唯有三義開成五」 tr. “There are only three names, while the meanings open into five”〔T1912 0240c26〕.

In embracing practice, although the treatise labels wisdom-practice primary and practice-practice auxiliary, the Fuxing adds, 「其實定慧俱是正修。慈等事觀方名為助」 tr. “In fact, concentration and wisdom are both primary cultivation; only phenomenal contemplations such as kindness are called auxiliary”〔T1912 0241b19〕. Śamatha is thus not uniformly demoted to an auxiliary, and the two practices in the Four Teachings can both be comprehended through the three contemplations of emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle.

In embracing stations, Zhanran harmonizes no stations and stations through the two aspects true and conventional: the cited no-stations applies only from the side of perfect principle, while the other scriptural passages mostly clarify successive stations. If one uses no stations to dismiss stages, one thereby dismisses cause and result as well. He therefore says, 「經云無位唯此一文。上下諸文盡明次位」 tr. “The scripture’s statement of no stations is only this one passage; all the passages above and below clarify successive stations”〔T1912 0242b07〕, and directly points out, 「汝言無位即無因果」 tr. “Your claim of no stations is itself the absence of cause and result”〔T1912 0243a15〕. The freedom of the nature of written words does not obstruct speaking of stations, and speaking of stations does not reify them as intrinsic natures.

In embracing teaching, whatever gives indication, classification, and explanation is included as teaching. Thus worldly accounts, wrong or right, and world-transcending teachings, partial or perfect, can all arise from mind and be comprehended by calming-and-contemplation. Breaking the mote and bringing forth the scroll concerns Dharma gates in sentient beings’ minds being covered and then disclosed; writing the scripture upward on space also includes the Buddha first personally realizing and then teaching others. The intent of one who transforms and those transformed mutually completes the account.

The final mutual inclusion of the six Dharmas does not repeat their preceding sequence of generation. The Fuxing says, 「前六但似相待。故須更明絕待之相」 tr. “The preceding six only seemed mutually relative; therefore the characteristic of severing relativity must be clarified further”〔T1912 0245a05〕. It then explains in turn how one principle, one delusion, one wisdom, one practice, one station, and one teaching each contains the other five. It concludes, 「此六法不出寂照不思議中一妙止觀」 tr. “These six Dharmas do not go beyond the one wondrous calming-and-contemplation within the inconceivability of quiescence and illumination”〔T1912 0245b19〕, and judges, 「此之六法即是前來不次第體」 tr. “These six Dharmas are precisely the preceding nonsuccessive essence”〔T1912 0245b22〕.

The Zhiguan Yili also uses 「借名略義。如攝法中及識藥等」 tr. “borrowing names and abbreviating meanings, as in Embracing the Dharmas, Recognizing Medicines, and the rest”〔T1913 0447c09〕 to explain that this chapter borrows the names and characteristics of Dharmas without exhaustively explicating every name within a single chapter. The Zhiguan Dayi marks the fascicle outline with 「明體攝法。判法偏圓此四並在第三卷中」 tr. “Clarifying essence, embracing Dharmas, and judging Dharmas as partial or perfect—these four are all in the third fascicle”〔T1914 0459c29〕.

5. Explanations of Various Masters

This unit’s direct later reception centers on “treating illness by finding the point” and the simile-structure in which one object of contemplation embraces many Dharmas.

Zhili’s Siming Shiyi Shu, T1936, says, 「故云伐樹得根。灸病得穴。乃是去其千枝百脈。唯取一根一穴。立所觀境」 tr. “Thus it is said: felling a tree, obtain the root; cauterizing an illness, obtain the point. This is to remove its thousand branches and hundred vessels, taking only one root and one point to establish the object contemplated”〔T1936 0835c05〕, and also, 「良由灸病得穴故。百病自差」 tr. “Precisely because cauterizing illness obtains the point, the hundred illnesses naturally recover”〔T1936 0841b22〕. He reuses this chapter’s one point embracing many illnesses in debate over the object contemplated. This is a later reuse of the scene, not a retrojection that makes Zhiyi’s chapter answer a Song-dynasty dispute.

Huaize’s Tiantai Chuan Fo Xinyin Ji, T1938, first says, 「的取識陰為所觀境。如去丈就尺去尺就寸。是為總無明心。若就總明別即第六識」 tr. “Precisely take the consciousness aggregate as the object contemplated, as leaving the fathom for the foot and the foot for the inch. This is the general mind of ignorance; if the particular is clarified within the general, it is the sixth consciousness”〔T1938 0934a22〕. He immediately reuses 「如伐樹得根。灸病得穴」 tr. “like felling a tree and obtaining the root, cauterizing an illness and obtaining the point”〔T1938 0934a24〕 to explain one object naturally embracing Dharmas. The Yuan exposition’s judgment concerning the object contemplated remains only a later witness.

The Siming Zunzhe Jiaoxing Lu, T1937, was searched by the markers embracing Dharmas, cauterizing illness, twelve entangling connections, breaking the mote and bringing forth the scroll, and writing the scripture upward on space, with each hit read in context. No direct correspondence containing both this unit’s distinctive markers and the same scene-structure was found. The near sentence 「同異與相攝云何得其意」 tr. “How could one grasp the meaning of sameness and difference and mutual inclusion?”〔T1937 0877b19〕 occurs in questions and answers on contemplating mind and form and therefore is not listed as direct reception. This is a bounded report of the markers searched and contexts found; it does not claim that the entire work contains no indirect reception. Later Shanjia and Shanwai controversy is recorded only for reuse here, without adjudicating right and wrong.

6. Terminology

TermUsage in the treatiseReading in the Zhiguan Fuxing Chuanhong Jue
Embracing the Dharmas「止觀總持,遍收諸法」 tr. “Calming-and-contemplation totally retains and universally gathers all Dharmas”〔T1911 0029c03〕The real essence of calming-and-contemplation is what embraces; principle, delusion, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching are what is embraced
Principle「理是諦法」 tr. “Principle is the Dharma of truths”〔T1911 0029c15〕; beyond provisional and real there is no separate principleThe Four Teachings open from teaching as that which expresses; principle as what is expressed includes only the two gates provisional and real
Delusion「以迷諦故,起生死惑。迷,即無明」 tr. “Through confusion about truth, the delusions of birth and death arise. Confusion is ignorance”〔T1911 0029c19〕According to confusion about provisional and real principle, delusions within and beyond the realms are distinguished; though some names agree, their essences do not
Associated, solitary-headJoined to the dispositions of views and thoughts, it is called associated; not associated, it is called solitary-headSolitary-head within the realms is explained through unassociated ignorance not occurring together with dispositions; its essence beyond the realms must be kept separate
Three paths「煩惱通業;業通苦;苦通煩惱」 tr. “Affliction communicates with karma; karma communicates with suffering; suffering communicates with affliction”〔T1911 0029c27〕“Path” is named from the three mutually communicating in turn; “obstruction” from obstructing the noble path
Mind-made bodyThe treatise states both three kinds and five kindsThe Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra has only three names; the five are Tiantai’s opening by meaning according to teachings and stations
Wisdom-practice, practice-practiceWisdom-practice is primary practice; practice-practice is auxiliary practiceConcentration and wisdom are both primary cultivation; only phenomenal contemplation such as kindness is spoken of as auxiliary practice
No stations, stationsThere is neither arising nor cessation, and right wisdom has nothing attained; yet because the three paths are purified, differences exist within the unconditionedNo stations is stated in terms of the true; stations are stated by lodging in the conventional. The two do not obstruct one another
TeachingAll worldly and world-transcending names arise from mindWhatever gives indication, classification, or explanation is called teaching; wrong and right, partial and perfect, can therefore all be included
Breaking the mote and bringing forth the scrollBreak open the covering mote so the scripture scroll is disclosedIt concerns the Dharma gates in the minds of sentient beings who are transformed, covered and then disclosed
Writing the scripture upward on spaceThe graphs of scripture are written on space; a later person sees them, copies them, and shows them to the assemblyIt also includes the Buddha first realizing personally and then teaching others through what was realized
Successive, nonsuccessiveThe six intents arise from principle through teaching; in the final passage each of the six Dharmas embraces the remainderThe separate explanations may contain both meanings; mutual inclusion specifically reveals the nonsuccessive and the severing of relativity

7. Similes · Cross-Reading · Carrying Forward

This unit opens with two similes in which one embraces many. If treating an illness finds the point, all ailments are removed; if the jewel king is obtained, all jewels are acquired. The former compares to calming quiescing all Dharmas, the latter to contemplation illuminating principle. The shortest images thus first answer how two names can embrace comprehensively. That no sandalwood exists outside Mount Moli then reveals that beyond provisional and real there is no third principle.

The embrace of delusion cross-illuminates illness and medicine: delusions within the realms that cover the true truth are illness; the calming-and-contemplation that enters emptiness from provisionality is medicine. Knowing the illness makes the medicine recognizable, while contemplating the medicine can also disclose the illness it treats. The embrace of practice uses the feet following the eyes to speak of primary and auxiliary practices; with understanding but without practice, one ultimately arrives nowhere. The embrace of stations uses the waxing and waning of moonlight to reveal the virtues of wisdom and severance, showing that nonarising and nothing attained do not prevent degrees in the purification of delusion.

The embrace of teaching has two great images. In one, a scripture scroll the size of a great trichiliocosm is stored within a mote, which is broken open so the scroll may benefit sentient beings. In the other, the twelve divisions of scripture are written in space; a later person sees the graphs, copies them, and gives guidance. The former discloses inherent wisdom from within its covering, while the latter discloses reading and transmission from writing in space. Both turn “teaching arises from mind” into visible action. The simile of placing poison in the five flavors further reveals indeterminacy: although names and stages change, the function is not lost. The treatise repurposes it through five kinds of contemplation to explain severing the two deaths and purifying the three paths.

The Zhiguan Yili takes Embracing the Dharmas as a model of borrowing names, abbreviating meanings, opening, and gathering back into one. The Zhiguan Dayi places Clarifying Essence, Embracing the Dharmas, and Partial and Perfect together in fascicle three; the two works may be cross-read as Tang outlines. Zhili in the Song and Huaize in the Yuan again inherit “cauterizing illness by finding the point” and turn it toward selecting the object contemplated so that it naturally embraces Dharmas. This line of transmission shows how one simile moved into later discourse on contemplating mind without rewriting the question Zhiyi was answering in his own chapter.

At the chapter’s end the sequence in which the six intents arise changes into the mutual inclusion of the six Dharmas: one principle embraces delusion, wisdom, practice, station, and teaching; one delusion through one teaching likewise each embraces the other five. The earlier portion resembles unfolding a map of Dharma gates along a sequence; the final portion makes every point on the map open to the whole. It still returns at last to two names, calming and contemplation, embracing all.

8. Placement of the Editions

This edition takes the Taishō T1911 Mohe Zhiguan as its single base text. In the Reader’s Source, the first paragraph after every page change bears a line anchor taken from the nearest preceding Taishō line marker. Variant readings list only original graphs attested in the Taishō notes and are recorded without adjudication. In the table, 【Taishō】 is the Taishō base, 【A】 is the Tokugawa printed copy held by Shimaji Daitō and others, and 【Correction】 is the electronic Buddhist canon correction; 『無』 tr. “absent” means that the witness lacks the graph.

No.Line anchorAdopted readingVariant and parallels
10029c04【Correction】【Taishō】; the note cross-references the Siming Shiyi Shu 0835c06 and Tiantai Chuan Fo Xinyin Ji 0934a24
20029c19生死【Taishō】【A】
30030c22【Taishō】廣云云【A】
40031b15佉》、【Correction】【Taishō】; the variant falls at the final graph and punctuation of a non-Buddhist school name
50031c26【Taishō】取二【A】
60032a06【Correction】【Taishō】; the forms scripture-teaching and scripture-scroll are recorded as separate layers

At 0029c02 the Palace edition also has an original note marking the end and beginning of a fascicle, but this is not a Taishō-note variant and is therefore not mixed into the table. All six notes are listed. Later parallels serve only as textual clues; a majority of witnesses is not used to adjudicate the reading.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing — with AI-assisted consistency checking

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0