摩訶止觀 破法遍·從空入假

〔T46 0075b27〕
心要Essence

若一切法皆空,還有誰可度、甚麼病可治、哪一味法可以給人?住在空中,看來乾淨,也不再受縛;《摩訶止觀》卻說:若因此永遠不回到眾生中,便永遠不能利益眾生。

從空入假,不是把已破的執著重新撿回來。菩薩入空,破自己的縛;走入假有,破他人的縛。這一步須有五種力量:看見眾生苦如己苦的慈悲,不忘拔苦與樂的本誓,能看見住空之過的智慧,入世而不受世染的方便,以及不因佛道長遠、眾生無數而疲退的精進。

所以本論把菩薩寫成大醫。大醫不能只會說『一切皆空』;他要知道病從哪裡起、積了多久、因甚麼環境與習性而異,也要知道藥的名稱、分量、時節與用法。有人先須世間善法安住人身,有人宜修戒定慧,有人宜從四念處、八正道入門,有人能直聞一實諦。同一場雨落下,草木各依根性生長;不是雨有偏私,而是受法不同。

舊方也不必永遠照用。南北水土不同,人的強弱、飲食鹹淡、疾病輕重也不同;神農之方到了後世,華他、扁鵲仍須觀時製方。菩薩通經作論也是如此:不是離經另造,而是使法在當前根機上真正成為療治。若守住舊方而堵塞教化,便已離開入假的用意。

那麼,要到多高的位次才有資格回來?本論不給所有人同一答案。下根或須久久伏斷,才能決定不退;中根可以較早出用;上根初發心時,已因不捨眾生而學病學藥。不能把初心冒充究竟,也不能因路遠,便把利他推到永遠不會到來的以後。

最後,『遍』不是知道的名目最多。病、藥、授藥有一處不通,還不能叫遍;一層層破到下一層,也還不是究竟的遍。真正的問題是:這一心能否在空中不住,在假中不染,照見無量差別而不離實相?

走出空,不是回頭。是空慧終於長出能承接眾生的翅膀。

If all Dharmas are empty, who remains to be delivered, what illness remains to be treated, and what Dharma medicine could be given? Abiding in emptiness appears clean and free from bondage. Yet the Mohe Zhiguan’s path of calming-and-contemplation says that if one therefore never returns among beings, one can never benefit them.

Entering the provisional from emptiness does not mean picking up an attachment already broken. The bodhisattva enters emptiness to break his own bondage; he enters provisional existence to break the bondage of others. This step requires five powers: compassion that sees beings’ suffering as one’s own, the original vow that does not forget to remove suffering and give happiness, wisdom that sees the fault of abiding in emptiness, skillful means that enters the world without being stained by it, and diligence that does not weary or retreat before the length of the Buddha path and the countlessness of beings.

The treatise therefore portrays the bodhisattva as a great physician. A great physician cannot merely say, “Everything is empty.” He must know where an illness began, how long it has accumulated, and how environment and habit have shaped it. He must also know the names, doses, seasons, and uses of medicines. Some first need worldly wholesome Dharmas to stabilize human life. Some should cultivate ethical discipline, concentration, and wisdom. Some should enter through the four foundations of mindfulness or the Eightfold Path. Some can directly hear the single truth of reality. One rain falls, and plants and trees grow according to their faculties. The rain is not partial; what receives Dharma differs.

Nor must an old prescription be followed forever. Northern and southern regions differ; people differ in strength, foods in intensity, and illnesses in gravity. In later ages, Hua Tuo and Bian Que still had to examine the time and formulate new prescriptions from Shennong’s original ones. A bodhisattva’s transmission of scripture and composition of treatise are the same. This is not invention apart from scripture, but making Dharma truly curative for present faculties. Preserving an old prescription in a way that blocks transformation has already departed from the intent of entering the provisional.

How high a stage, then, qualifies someone to return? The treatise does not give everyone the same answer. Lower faculties may need long suppression and severance before irreversibility is certain. Middling faculties can emerge and function earlier. From the initial arousal of mind, higher faculties already study illness and medicine because they will not abandon beings. The initial mind must not be passed off as the ultimate; neither may benefiting others be postponed, because the road is long, to a future that never arrives.

Finally, “pervasive” does not mean knowing the greatest number of categories. If even one point among illness, medicine, and administration remains unpenetrated, knowledge is not yet pervasive. Breaking one layer only to proceed to the next is likewise not ultimate pervasiveness. The real question is whether this one mind can refrain from abiding in emptiness, remain unstained within the provisional, and illuminate immeasurable distinctions without departing from the true mark.

Emerging from emptiness is not turning back. It is the wisdom of emptiness finally growing wings that can bear beings.

原典Canonical · verbatim

隋天台智者大師說・門人灌頂記《摩訶止觀》· 大正藏 T46n1911〔起 T46 0075b27〕。段/行首〔T46 …〕=大正藏頁·欄·行錨(換頁一枚)。

〔T46 0075b27〕○第二、從空入假破法遍者,即為四:一、入假意,二、明入假因緣,三、明入假觀,四、明入假位。 入假意者:自有但從空入假;自有知空非空,破空入假。夫二乘智斷亦同證真,無大悲故不名菩薩。《華嚴》云:「諸法實性相,二乘亦皆得,而不名為佛。」若論自行,入空有分;若論化物,出假則無。菩薩從假入空,自破縛著,不同凡夫;從空入假,破他縛著,不同二乘。處有不染,法眼識藥,慈悲逗病,博愛無限,兼濟無倦,心用自在。善巧方便如空中種樹;又如仰射空中,筈筈相拄,不令墮地。若住於空,則於眾生永無利益。志存利他,即入假之意也。 ○入假因緣者,略言有五。一、慈悲心重:初破假時,見諸眾生顛倒獄縛不能得出,起大慈悲,愛同一子。今既斷惑入空,同體哀傷倍復隆重;先人後己,與拔彌篤。 二、憶本誓願者:本發弘誓,拔苦與樂,令得安隱。今眾生苦多,未能得度,我若獨免,辜違先心。不忘本懷,豈捨含識?入假同事而引導之。二乘初業不愚於法,亦有大願;隔生中忘,退大取小,眾聖所呵。菩薩不爾,如母得食常憶其兒。 三、智慧猛利:若入空時,即知空中有棄他之過。何以故?若住於空,則無淨佛國土、教化眾生、具足佛法,皆不能辦。既知過已,非空入假。 四、善巧方便:能入世間,雖生死煩惱,不能損智慧;遮障留難,彌助化道。 五、大精進力:雖佛道長遠不以為遙,雖眾生數多而意有勇。心堅無退,精進發趣,初無疲怠。是名「五緣」。 如此五意與《淨名經》同。彼文有三種慰喻:先明觀身無常等,是入空慰喻;最後云「當作醫王」,是入中慰喻;中間是入假慰喻。即有五意:以己之疾愍於彼疾,即是同體大悲。當識宿世無數劫苦,豈非本誓?當念饒益一切眾生,豈非知空之過?憶所修福,念於淨命,即是善巧方便。勿生憂惱,常起精進,即是第五意。此義與彼文懸合云云。 〔T46 0076a06〕從空入假,四法若無,決不能出。利根一種,今當分別。但住空聲聞未必鈍根;入假菩薩未必利根。如身子智利而不出假。當用四句釋之:或根利住空,或根鈍住空,或根利入假,或根鈍入假。譬如身羸無力而膽勇成就,入險破敵,前無橫陣;自有身力雄壯,膽勇復強,左推右盪,無能當者;自有身力雖多,怯弱畏懼,雖有好力,望陣失膽;自有無力、無膽,兩事不具,何能有功?今住空之人亦有兩種,出假亦然。具五緣者如有親、有約、有策、有力、有膽,故能入假。智根雖鈍,四事因緣亦能入假。聲聞之人雖有利智,全無四事,故不能入假也。 ○三、明入假觀者,即為三:一、知病,二、識藥,三、授藥。 知病者,知「見」、「思」病。知見根本、知起見因緣、知起見久近、知見惑重數。 云何知見根本?我見為諸見本;一念惑心為我見本。從此惑心起無量見,縱橫稠密不可稱計。為此見故造眾結業,墮墜三途沈迴無已。如旋火輪,若欲息之,應當止手。知心無心,妄想故心起;亦知我無我,顛倒故我生。顛倒及妄想息者,即是根本息,枝條自去。 云何知見起因緣?因緣不同,生見亦異。何以得知?內外相故知。內外相者:眾生居處相異,時序寒熱,國土高低,產育精麁,食物濃淡,處所異故,果報相異。雖土風所出,蓄散豐儉,或有或無,或得或失,貧富飢飽云云。形貌相異:矬長端醜,偉瘠健病云云。根性欣惡相異:忽榮棄位,樵漁自樂,扣牛干相,負鼎邀卿,專文專武,耽酒嗜味,多貪多奢,多瞋多喜,多癡多黠;如是參差百千萬品。直置人道,各各殊別,何況異類,不可勝言!如此依正種種不同者,必知業異;業異故起見異。是故則見末知本,見外識內。 云何知起見久近?知如是見積累重沓非止一世;知如是見近世所起;知如是見此世適起;知如是見未來方盛。 云何知見重數多少?從一有見派出三假,又從三假派出四句;三假合十二句。又從四句出四悉檀;十二句合四十八悉檀。又一悉檀派出性空、相空;四十八悉檀合有九十六性、相空。一一句各有止、觀,合一百九十二句止觀。就前根本,都合三百四十八句。此就信行人如此,法行人亦如是。信行轉為法行亦如是,法行轉為信行亦如是。就四人,合有一千三百九十二句。此約一有見如此,無見亦如是,亦有亦無見亦如是,非有非無見亦如是。就四見,有五千五百六十八句。單四見如此,複四見亦如是,具足四見亦如是。就三種四見,合有一萬六千七百四句不可說見。如初有見,但有一千三百九十二句,是則合有一萬八千九十六句。此是所破如此,能破亦如是;能、所合論則有三萬六千一百九十二句。自行如此,化他亦如是;自行、化他都合七萬二千三百八十四句。若更約六十二見、八十八使,論三假、四句等者,則有無量無邊不可窮盡。 病相無量,菩薩悉知。知若干句共成此見,知若干句共成彼見。深淺輕重,善巧分別而無僻謬,是名知集。既知集已,亦能知苦。苦集流轉,精曉本末。又入空之前,遍觀見思,總知病相,為出假方便,後用一門斷惑入空。若出假時分別見思,照之則易;薄修止觀,法眼則明。 二乘入空專依一門,無此弄引,教二弟子,謬授於藥。又少五意,何能入假?而菩薩善巧,大悲本願,大精進力,或寂諸想而發法眼,識知見病;或觀達見法,發道種智,明了惑法。若不悟者,但精進力勤研止觀,內因既熟,外被佛加,或冥或顯,豁然開悟,於諸見病,句句明了。如於鏡中見諸色像,自識識他,諦審無礙。 次、明知思病本、知思起因緣、知思起久近、知思病重數。三意例見病可知,思假以癡為本云云。 重數者:九地則有八十一品。初一品有三假,有四句止觀;三假合十二句。一句即有信解、見得,各各用四悉檀;信、法各有八合,則十六番。此信、法互有轉義,復為十六;合前則有三十二句。一句既三十二句,十二句三假,合有十二句,則有三百八十四句。一一句復有性、相二空,則合有七百六十八句;足前合為一千一百五十二句。含根本,合為一千一百六十四句。一品如此,九品合有一萬四百七十六句。欲界九品如此,三界九品合有九萬四千二百八十四句。所破如此,能破亦然;能、所合有十八萬八千五百六十八句。自行如此,化他亦然;合有二十七萬七千一百三十六句止觀。 〔T46 0077a05〕若細論,一一品復有無量品,一一禪復有無量禪。通明、背捨等,直置諸禪發時,已自不可說,況復禪禪品品。品品之內,復有三假、四觀等句,其數難知。若准見惑四十里水,此緣一諦,應是一十里水。不橫起故,稱之一渧。重數甚多,亦可十里。 二乘直入故不分別;菩薩初破思假已作方便。先總知竟。今出假修觀助開法眼,通用止觀為知假之門。別修各有方法,息諸緣念名「止」;緣此思假名「觀」。大悲本願,大精進力,諸佛威加,豁然開解,得法眼見,道種智知,分別思假病相分明云云。 上見、思重數雖煩,知之何妨?如五部律不填人胸,對緣行事能自正正他?學此諸句即行即用,自行化他隨意無礙。 ○二、入假識藥者,病相無量,藥亦無量。略言為三:一、世間法藥,二、出世間法藥,三、出世間上上法藥。 《大品》有三種法施:「三歸、五戒、十善道、四禪、無量心等,名世間法施;二、出世間法施;三、出世間上上法施。」可知云云。 《釋論》云:「何惠用世間法施?譬如王子從高墮下,父王愛念,積以繒綿於地接之,令免苦痛。眾生亦爾,應墮三途,聖人愍念,以世善法權接引之,令免惡趣。」然施法藥,凡愚本自不知,皆是聖人託迹同凡,出無佛世,誘誨童蒙。《大經》云:「一切世間外道經書皆是佛說,非外道說。」《光明》云:「一切世間所有善論皆因此經。」若深識世法,即是佛法。何以故?束於十善即是五戒;深知五常、五行義亦似五戒。仁慈矜養,不害於他,即不殺戒;義讓推廉,抽己惠彼,是不盜戒;禮制規矩,結髮成親,即不邪婬戒;智鑒明利,所為秉直,中當道理,即不飲酒戒;信契實錄,誠節不欺,是不妄語戒。周孔立此五常,為世間法藥,救治人病。又五行似五戒:不殺防木;不盜防金;不婬防水;不妄語防土;不飲酒防火。又五經似五戒:《禮》明撙節,此防飲酒;《樂》和心,防婬;《詩》風刺,防殺;《尚書》明義讓,防盜;《易》測陰陽,防妄語。 如是等世智之法,精通其極,無能逾,無能勝,咸令信伏而師導之。出假菩薩欲知此法,當別於通明觀中勤心修習。大悲誓願,精進無怠;諸佛威加,豁然明解,於世法藥永無疑滯。然世法藥非畢竟治,屈步移足雖垂盡三有,當復退還。故云:「凡夫雖修有漏禪,其心行穿如漏器;雖生非想當復退還,如雨彩衣其色駮脫。」世醫雖差,差復還生,此之謂也。 次、明知出世法藥者:如《大經》云:「或說信為道,或說樂欲,或說不放逸,或說精進,或說身念處,或說正定,或說修無常,或說蘭若處,或說為他說法,或說持戒,或說親近善友,或說修慈等也。」 又如諸經中,或一道為藥,如一行三昧。如佛告比丘:「他物莫取,一切法皆是他物;於一切法不受成羅漢。」如前所明,單、複諸見皆悉不受。或二道為藥,定愛智策,二輪平等;或三法為藥,謂戒定慧;或四法為藥,謂四念處;或五法為藥,謂五力;或六法謂六念;七覺、八正道、九想、十智,如是等增數明道,乃至八萬四千不可稱數。或眾多一法乃至無量一法,不可說一法。或眾多十法,無量十法,不可說十法。是一一法有種種名、種種相、種種治,出假菩薩皆須識知。為眾生故集眾法藥,如海導師。若不知者,不能利物。為欲知故,一心通修止觀,大悲誓願及精進力;諸佛威加,法眼開發,皆能了知,如觀掌果。 又、知出世上上法藥,約止觀一法為藥者,謂一實諦。無明心與法性合,則有一切病相。觀此法性尚無法性,何況無明及一切法? 或二法為藥,即是止、觀,體達心性,虛妄休息。 或三法為藥,即是止、觀及隨道戒,任運防護。又三三昧,從假入空名空三昧;亦不見空相名無相三昧;生死業息名無作三昧。 或四法為藥,謂四念處。諸見皆依色,此色非污穢、非不污穢;受諸見思非苦、非樂;諸見想行非我、非無我;諸見思心尚非心,豈是常、無常? 或五法為藥,即是五根。修止觀時無疑名信根;常念止觀不念餘事即念根;止觀不息即精進根;一心在定即定根;四句體達無性故即慧根。五根增長,名為「五力」。 或六法為藥,謂六念處。以止觀覺見思惑即是佛法界,不破法身名「念佛」;常憶持止觀,不分別止觀一異相名「念法」;止觀理和,是無為相,故名「念僧」;止觀有隨道戒名「念戒」;止觀即第一義名「念天」;止觀捨見思惑名「念捨」。 〔T46 0078a01〕或七法為藥者,止是除、捨、定三覺分;觀是擇、喜、精進覺分;念通兩處。 或八法為藥,四句破假名「正見」;動發正見名「思惟」;依此修行名「正業」;說此止觀名「正語」;不以邪諂養身為「正命」;不離不忘名「正念」;止名「正定」;無間念名「精進」。 或九法為藥者,謂四見是污穢五陰,五陰變壞名「色變想」乃至九云云。 或十法為藥,即十智。見思兩假是集苦智;止觀是道智;二十五有不生是滅智;知三界皆爾是比智;以世間名字故說即世智;知他眾生亦然是他心智;知諸法差別是等智;知苦集盡名盡智;無漏之慧名無生智。 當知止觀為益眾生,隨根增減,既得為十,亦得為恒河沙佛法也。譬如神農甞草立方,或一藥、二藥乃至十藥為方,眾多藥為方;為病立方,非無因緣。入假菩薩亦復如是,知諸法門,一法、二法至無量法;或為一病,或為兼病。又如諸藥,皮肉汁果、根莖枝葉各各如是。山海水陸、四方土地各有所出。採掘乾濕,各各有時。又知諸藥各有所治。入假菩薩知眾生根,識所宜法,亦復如是。知此一一法乃至多法是其樂欲;知彼一法、二法,非其樂欲。知此一法、二法是其便宜、非其便宜;是對治、非對治;是入第一義、非入第一義,皆審識之。 欲治一病,一藥即足;欲為大醫,遍須諸藥。二乘治惑,一法即足;菩薩大誓,須一切知。又如大地產藥而分劑作方;如大河水分劑升合,不過不減。法藥亦爾,於一寂定開無量止;於一大慧開無量觀,皆實不虛。又如眾生病緣種種不同;諸病苦痛種種不同;諸藥方治種種不同;病差因緣種種不同。湯飲吐下,針炙丸散,得差之緣亦復非一。入假菩薩亦如是,知一切眾生見思煩惱集不同,是知集;知一切眾生善惡苦果不同,是知苦;知一切法門,是知道;知一切眾生入證不同,是知滅。種種四諦,入假菩薩無不遍知。 摩訶止觀卷第六〔上〕 摩訶止觀卷第六〔下〕 隋天台智者大師說 門人灌頂記 復次,神農本方用治後人,未必併益。華他、扁鵲觀時、觀藥更立於方。所以者何?鄉土有南北,人有儜健,食有鹹淡,藥有濃淡,病有輕重,依本方治不能效益,隨時製立仍得差愈。佛初出世,眾生機熟,逗根說法,無不得悟。後代澆漓,情惑轉異,直用佛經,於其無益。菩薩觀機,通經作論,令眾生得悟。唯悟益彼是入假正意,豈可守舊壅於化道耶?《釋論》云:「依隨經法,廣立名字而為作義,名為法施。」菩薩為修如此慧故,大悲誓願,勤精進力,通修止觀;諸佛加威,豁然鑒朗,於入假智而得自在。 ○三、應病授藥者,既知苦集之病,又識道滅之藥。若眾生無出世機,根性薄弱不堪深化,但授世藥。如孔丘、姬旦,制君臣,定父子,故敬上愛下,世間大治。禮律節度,尊卑有序,此扶於戒也;樂以和心,移風易俗,此扶於定;先王至德要道,此扶於慧。元古混沌,未宜出世;邊表根性,不感佛興。我遣三聖化彼真丹;禮義前開,大小乘經然後可信。真丹既然,十方亦爾,故前用世法而授與之云云。 又授出世藥者,十種因緣所成眾生根性不同,則是病異。隨其病故,授藥亦異,謂下、中、上、上上。 下根四義:一者、志樂狹劣,二、行力微弱,三、五濁障重,四、智慧極鈍。樂小法故,說生滅法;行力微弱,修事六度;五濁障重,勤苦對治;智慧鈍故,斷婬怒癡,名為解脫。是為授因緣生法之藥,治下根病也。 雖是下根,欣樂不同,諸聖作論,復開為四。樂聞有者,說《阿毘曇》,生其小善,破其五濁,因此方便見於真諦。樂聞無者,說《成實論》,生其小善,破惡入真。樂聞有無,說《昆勒論》,生善破惡入真。樂聞非有非無者,為說《離有無經》,生善破惡入真。是為入假菩薩作四論,申四門,授四藥,治諸病云云。 次、中根人授藥者:此人心志小強,行力小勝,宜生理善;五濁障輕,智慧小利。赴其樂欲,為說因緣即空;聞生理善,破於惡因,見第一義。是為授即空藥治中根人。此又為四:謂下、中、上、上上,即是四門入池,例前云云。 次、觀上根人授藥者:樂欲心廣,善根開闊,五濁已除,智慧又大。授無量四諦,生界外善;次第斷五住,得入中道。是為授即假藥治上根人。就此又為四,即是四門授藥,例上可知。 〔T46 0079a02〕次、觀上上根授藥者:此人樂欲乃至智慧悉無與等,故名上上。為如理直說,善如空生,障如空滅,入究竟道。是名授即中藥治上上根人。亦有四門授藥治病云云。 若入空觀,尚無一法,何有諸法?今授十六道、滅,治十六苦、集,正是入假。隨其類音,妙聲遍告,發彼耳識,轉度入心,令得服行,各獲利益。如一雲所雨,而諸草木各得生長云云。 ○四、明入假位者:一、先歷教判位,二、明利益,三、結破法遍。 人意咸言:「先除見假,後却思惟。」入空之果尚已迢遰;出假化物非已所能。望崖自絕!今當分別假位不同。 夫三乘之初,不愚於法,皆欲求佛;厭患生死,喜多退轉。譬如有人俱聞他方有七寶山,翹心束脚;若念路艱險,便退不前。行人亦爾,畏懼生死,退大沈空。後聞菩薩勝妙功德,自惟敗種,泣動大千,不待所因而懷憂悔。若依此義,但有入空,便無入假事也。 若三藏菩薩,初修空狼,伏煩惱羊而不斷結。若斷結者,則無六度功德身肥,是初阿僧祇位也。二僧祇,煩惱脂消,功德轉肥。三僧祇,正入假位,利益眾生。此下根人也。中根二僧祇已伏煩惱,肥六度身,即能化物,豈待三耶?上根初發心時為度一切,誓求作佛;因聞他說,心已明解,深識真理;為度他故,不求斷證。心又一轉,我應度他,不應不度;當勤分別一切藥病。何以故?五事重故。如人將兒過險,自既安隱,那得擲兒?雖自知空而不棄捨,是為初心即能入假,不待至二僧祇也。 通教位者,人多執經云:「八地修出假;或六地、七地斷結與羅漢齊,方修出假。」此一途之說,必不全爾。但佛為三根分別。下根斷惑盡,方能出假。佛於《法華》中破其取涅槃心,勸發無上道、起方便慧。二乘既然,極鈍菩薩亦應同此說。今判此為下根耳。中根者,斷見惑已,生死少寬,思任運斷。第二地名菩薩神通,從此已去即能入假。上根者,初心聞慧即能體達見思即空,已為眾生作依止處,何須七地方出假耶? 若七地者,為《大品》所呵。有大鳥身長三百由旬而無兩翅,從天而墮,若死、若死等苦。菩薩亦如是,從初一向專修於空,至于六地,是為三空身肥,假翅不生。若墮二乘方便道名「死等苦」;若墮初果名之為「死」。若見盡是死等;若無學是為死。是鳥欲還天上,可得去不?墮無學地,欲發菩薩心,永不能得。如人被閹,不能五欲。《華嚴》、《大品》不能治之,唯有《法華》能令無學還生善根,得成佛道,所以稱妙。又闡提有心,猶可作佛;二乘滅智,心不可生。《法華》能治,復稱為妙云云。 別教之人,十住心後,十行之位,修假方便。何以故?入理般若名為「住」;住生功德名為「行」云云。下根也。十住初心即能入假,已得無漏,一受不退即能出用,何須至十行方起大悲?中根也云云。又別教初心不愚於法,達解一切功德猶如幻化,於名字不滯而修方便,具五因緣以益眾生,上根也。 圓教十信六根淨時,即遍見聞十法界事。若是入空,尚無一物;既言六根互用,即是入假位也。又五品弟子正行六度廣能說法,即是入假之位,何必待六根淨耶?又初心之人能知如來祕密之藏,圓觀三諦,尚能即中,豈不即假?《大品》云:「初坐道場,尚便成正覺,轉法輪,度眾生。」又六即料簡便有出假之義,何須待至五品耶? 上來諸教皆有三位,若定判者,應取下根以明其位。則有二義:一、依教故,二、決不退轉。入假行成,中、上乍有進退,故不約其論位。 既有三根出假,例應三根入空? 謂情入、似入、真入。情入者,觸人能入,非謂散情。緣諦之觀,於似、真之前與空法塵相應。 若爾何益? 此有情益。 若益,無退? 不併退。設退,能憶念數修,後致大益。 問:通、別上根能入空出假,與圓何異? 答:通人出入,不能即中;別人次第出入,不能一心。圓人一心出入,亦能別出入,謂:多入中少入二,多入二少入中;多入空、中少入假,多入假少入空、中;多入假、中少入空,多入空少入假、中。雖別增減,而三諦不缺。 若爾,則非次第之別? 然尚能為勝別,況不能為劣耶? 二、明入假利益者:菩薩本不貴空而修空,本為眾生故修空。不貴空故不住,為益眾生故須出。故有從真起應,法眼稱機。應以佛身得度,即作佛身說法授藥;應以菩薩、二乘、天龍八部等形得度,而為現之。成就眾生,淨佛國土,乃名「利益」。 三藏菩薩雖復出假,有漏神通非真起應;世智分別非法眼明。雖利眾生而非成就;雖作佛事非淨佛土。止是少分教化,為益甚微云云。若通教入假,雖分別藥病,但依二諦,診病不深,識藥不遠,但是作意神通,非真起應。應有始終,為作父母師長,世世結緣,處處調伏,動經無量阿僧祇劫。善根若熟,即生王宮;道樹作佛,漸頓度人,乃至入涅槃,舍利住世。久久利益,有始有終,乃名為「應」。無而欻有,暫出還沒,故非真應。一時片益,不名「成就」;灰身入滅,非淨佛土。 〔T46 0080a11〕別教十行,入假利益義同通教。若登地時,得如來一身無量身,湛然應一切。爾時知病,盡病淵源;爾時識藥,窮藥府藏;爾時授藥,如印不差。真道種智,最勝法眼,所可應化,任運普周。和光同塵結緣之始,八相成道以論其終。亦名為「化」,亦名為「應」。其見聞者無不蒙益,有所施為是淨佛國土,入假利益皆實不虛。登地既然,後地例爾。乃至圓教初住入假,真實利益;乃至後心,亦復如是。 若得此意,料簡變化即識真偽。所以者何?魔亦能以有漏心作無漏形,變為佛像。老子西升,亦云作佛化胡;諸外道等變釋為羊,停河在耳。世智五通靡所不作,如是邪化無量無邊。尚非三藏五通化,云何得是別圓任運真化?化語多種,無眼之人謬生信受。能深觀察,不可雷同。故知從法身地,垂應十界度脫眾生,如此入假,真利益位。 三、結破法遍者:未發真前,隨所計著,百千萬種皆名為見。如盲問乳,非乳真色;若繩若杵,何關象事?囈言之見,見即是假,故歷單、複、具足以觀破之。破若不遍,不得入空;見思若盡,乃名「破法遍」也。就文字論,乃當如此,意則不然。見思即是無明,無明即是法性。見思破即是無明破,無明破即是見法性。入實相空,方名「破法遍」也。從空入假破法遍亦爾。假有無量病法、藥法、授藥法,分別此三有所不達,不名「破法遍」。未發法眼之前,雖有分別,分有所見,不名「破遍」。六根淨時,分別一病有若干種,解一句法達無量句,十方諸佛說法一時受持,是為相似氣分。障通無知既破,雙照二諦,方名「破法遍」也。舉要而言,次第破者則不名「遍」,不次第破乃名為「遍」耳。前觀法重沓既多,恐人迷故,約二觀後結破法遍也。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

為何從空觀走入假觀

第二,說明從空入假而成就破法遍。這一部分分成四科:第一,說明入假的用意;第二,說明能夠入假的因緣;第三,說明入假的觀法;第四,判明入假的位次。

入假有兩種情形:一種只是從空觀進入假觀;一種是知道空也不是可以執著的實法,因而破除對空的執著,進入假觀。二乘人的智慧與斷惑,也同樣能證真諦;但因為沒有大悲,所以不叫作菩薩。《華嚴經》說,諸法的真實性相,二乘人也能證得,卻不能因此稱為佛。若只論自己修行,二乘人也有入空的分;若論教化眾生,他們便沒有出空入假的作用。

菩薩從假入空,破除自己的繫縛與執著,所以不同於凡夫;又從空入假,破除他人的繫縛與執著,所以不同於二乘。菩薩身處萬有而不受污染,以法眼辨識法藥,以慈悲配合眾生的病情,廣愛眾生而沒有邊際,兼濟群生而不知疲倦,心的運用自在無礙。這種善巧方便,好比在空中種樹;又好比仰身向空中射箭,後箭的箭尾接住前箭,使箭不落到地上。倘若停住在空,便永遠不能利益眾生。立志在利益他人,正是進入假觀的用意。

能夠入假的五種因緣

入假因緣,約略有五種。

第一,慈悲心深重。最初破除假有時,看見眾生受顛倒束縛,如同被囚在牢獄而不能脫出,便生起大慈悲,把眾生愛護得如同自己的孩子。如今自己已經斷惑入空,看見眾生受苦如同自己受苦,哀傷反而加倍深重;凡事先想到別人,後想到自己,拔苦與樂的心越發真切。

第二,憶念原有的誓願。菩薩起初曾發弘誓,要拔除眾生的苦,給予眾生安樂,使他們得到安穩。如今眾生苦患眾多,還未得到度脫;自己若獨自免除苦患,便辜負了先前的心願。既不忘本懷,怎會捨棄一切含識眾生?所以菩薩進入假有,與眾生共同生活,從中引導他們。二乘人在最初修業時,對佛法也並不愚昧,也曾有過大願;但經過隔世便忘失本心,從大乘退轉而取著小乘,因此受到眾聖呵責。菩薩不是這樣,正如母親得到食物,總會憶念自己的孩子。

第三,智慧猛利。菩薩進入空觀時,立刻知道停在空中會有捨棄他人的過失。為甚麼?如果住在空中,淨佛國土、教化眾生、具足一切佛法等事,全都不能成辦。既已知道這種過失,便不再以空為究竟,而從空進入假。

第四,善巧方便。菩薩能進入世間;縱然置身生死煩惱,生死煩惱也不能損害他的智慧。種種遮障、阻留與困難,反而更加幫助他的教化之道。

第五,大精進力。佛道雖然長遠,菩薩不認為遙不可及;眾生數量雖多,他的心意仍然勇健。其心堅固而不退轉,精進向前,從來沒有疲倦懈怠。這便叫作五種因緣。

這五種意思與《淨名經》相合。經中有三類安慰病人的譬喻:先說觀身無常等,是以入空安慰;最後說應當成為醫王,是以入中安慰;中間所說則是以入假安慰,其中也有五意。由自己的病憐憫他人的病,就是同體大悲;應當了知自己在宿世無數劫中所受的苦,豈不就是憶念本誓?應當念念饒益一切眾生,豈不就是知道住空的過失?憶念自己所修的福德,念念安住清淨的活命方式,就是善巧方便;不要生起憂愁苦惱,常常發起精進,就是第五意。此處的義理與該經遙相契合。〔云云〕

從空入假,若缺少慈悲、誓願、方便、精進這四法,決定不能走出空觀。至於利根這一項,還須另外分別:住在空中的聲聞不一定是鈍根,進入假觀的菩薩也不一定是利根。例如身子舍利弗智慧銳利,卻不走出空觀。應以四句分別:有根利而住空,有根鈍而住空,有根利而入假,也有根鈍而入假。

這好比有人身體羸弱、沒有力氣,膽量卻十分勇健,仍能進入險地破敵,面前沒有一支橫陣能阻擋他;有人身力雄壯,膽量也強,左推右衝,沒有人抵擋得住;有人雖然力氣很大,性情卻怯弱畏懼,空有好力氣,一望見敵陣便喪失膽量;也有人既沒有力量,又沒有膽量,兩者都不具足,怎能建立功業?住空的人有這兩類,出假的人也有這兩類。具足五緣,好比有親人相助、有盟約可憑、有策略可用、有力量可恃、有膽量可行,所以能夠入假。即使智慧根性稍鈍,只要具足其餘四種因緣,也能入假。聲聞人縱有銳利智慧,卻完全缺少這四事,所以不能入假。

入假觀的三件事

第三,說明入假觀。入假觀分成三件事:第一,知道病;第二,辨識藥;第三,依病授藥。

所謂知道病,就是知道見惑與思惑兩類病。對見惑,要知道它的根本,知道它生起的因緣,知道它生起得久遠或近期,也知道見惑病的輕重與數量。

知道見惑之病

怎樣知道見惑的根本?以我見為一切見的根本,而一念迷惑的心又是我見的根本。從這迷惑心生起無量邪見,縱橫交錯,稠密到不可計數。眾生因這些見而造作種種結使與業,墮入三惡道,沉淪迴轉,沒有止息。這好比旋轉火把所見的火輪;若要火輪止息,應當停下揮動火把的手。應當知道,心本來沒有真實的心,只因妄想而有心生起;我也本來沒有真實的我,只因顛倒而有我出生。顛倒與妄想止息,根本便止息,枝條自然隨之消失。

怎樣知道見惑生起的因緣?因緣各不相同,所生的見也各不相同。從甚麼知道?從內外的相狀就能知道。所謂內外相,是說眾生的居住環境彼此有別:季節有寒有熱,國土有高有低,出產與生育有精細、有粗糙,食物有濃有淡。因為處所有異,果報也就有異。即使同屬地方風土所產,仍有積蓄與散失、豐足與儉約,有時有、有時無,有時得到、有時失去,也有貧富、飢飽等分別。〔云云〕形貌也彼此不同:有矮有高,有端正有醜陋,有魁偉有瘦弱,有健康有疾病。〔云云〕

人的根性、喜好與厭惡也各不相同:有人忽然得到榮華卻拋棄官位,有人以砍柴捕魚為樂;有人叩擊牛角求取卿相,有人背著鼎器求取公卿之位;有人專長文事,有人專長武事;有人沉迷飲酒,有人貪嗜滋味;有人多貪,有人奢侈;有人多瞋,有人多喜;有人愚癡,有人機黠。如此參差錯落,有百千萬種。只說人道之中,人人已各自不同,何況其他種類的眾生,更是說之不盡。依報與正報有這種種差別,必可知道各自所造的業不同;業不同,生起的見便不同。因此,看見末端便能知道根本,看見外相便能辨識內因。

怎樣知道見惑生起得久或近?有的見是多生積累、層層重疊而來,不只一世;有的見是近一世才生起;有的見在這一世剛剛生起;也有的見將在未來才逐漸盛大。

怎樣知道見惑的重數有多少?從一種有見分出因成假、相續假、相待假三假,再由每一假分出有、無、亦有亦無、非有非無四句,三假合成十二句。每一四句再分出世界、為人、對治、第一義四悉檀,十二句合成四十八悉檀。每一悉檀又分出性空與相空,四十八悉檀便合成九十六種性空、相空。每一句各有止與觀,合成一百九十二句止觀;再計入前面的根本,總共三百四十八句。

這是約信行人而論,法行人也是如此;信行轉為法行也是如此,法行轉為信行也是如此。就這四類人,合有一千三百九十二句。以一種有見來說是這樣,無見、亦有亦無見、非有非無見也都是這樣;四見合有五千五百六十八句。單一的四見是這樣,複合的四見、具足的四見也都是這樣;三類四見合有一萬六千七百零四句不可說之見。再加上最初有見的一千三百九十二句,便合有一萬八千零九十六句。

以上是所破之見,能破的止觀也有同樣數目;合論能破與所破,便有三萬六千一百九十二句。自己修行是這樣,教化他人也同樣是這樣;自行與化他合計,共有七萬二千三百八十四句。若再依六十二見、八十八使來論三假、四句等,便有無量無邊,窮盡不了。

病相雖然無量,菩薩全都能知道。他知道多少句共同構成這一種見,也知道多少句共同構成那一種見;對其中深淺、輕重,都能善巧分別,不生偏差錯謬,這叫作知集。既知道集,也就能知道苦;苦集如何流轉,其根本與末端都能精細通曉。

菩薩在入空之前,曾遍觀見惑與思惑,總體知道病相,把這作為出假的方便,然後才以一門斷惑入空。等到出假時,再分別照察見思二惑,便很容易;稍微修習止觀,法眼就能明朗。二乘人入空,只依一門,沒有這一番預先的引導;日後教導兩個弟子,便會錯誤地給藥。他們又缺少前述五意,怎能入假?

菩薩具有善巧、大悲、本願與大精進力:有時寂滅種種妄想而開發法眼,辨識見惑的病;有時觀照通達見法,發起道種智,明白一切惑法。倘若尚未悟入,就以精進力勤勉研究止觀;內在因緣成熟,又在外受到諸佛加持,或在暗中、或在明顯處,忽然開悟。從此對種種見病,每一句都了然明白,如同在鏡中看見一切色像;無論辨識自己或辨識他人,都能審諦清楚,沒有障礙。

知道思惑之病

其次,要知道思惑病的根本,知道思惑生起的因緣,知道它生起得久遠或近期,也知道思惑病的輕重與數量。前三項可以比照見惑之病而知道,只是思惑的假相以愚癡為根本。〔云云〕

至於思惑的重數:三界九地共有八十一品。先說其中一品。這一品有三假,每一假都有四句止觀,所以三假合有十二句。每一句又有信解、見得兩類,兩類各用四悉檀;信行與法行各有八番,合為十六番。信行、法行彼此又都有轉變的意義,再成十六番;合前共三十二句。一句既展成三十二句,十二句三假合計便有三百八十四句。每一句又各有性空、相空二空,合成七百六十八句;再加前數,合成一千一百五十二句;連根本一併計入,合成一千一百六十四句。

一品如此,九品合有一萬零四百七十六句。欲界九品如此,推及三界九地的九品,合有九萬四千二百八十四句。所破如此,能破也如此;能破與所破合有十八萬八千五百六十八句。自己修行如此,教化他人也如此;自行、化他合有二十七萬七千一百三十六句止觀。

若再仔細分析,每一品中還有無量品,每一禪中也有無量禪。通明禪、八背捨等禪法,只說各種禪定發起之時,已經不可說盡,何況每一禪、每一品之中,又各有三假、四種觀法等句,其數更難知道。若以見惑譬作四十里水,思惑只緣一諦,應當譬作十里水;因為它不橫向生起,所以稱作一滴。它的重數實在很多,也仍可說有十里之水。

二乘人徑直入空,所以不作分別;菩薩在最初破思假時,已先作好方便,早已總體知道一切。如今從空出假,再修觀法以幫助開發法眼,便通用止觀作為知道假有的門。若分別修習,則各有方法:止息一切攀緣與念想,叫作止;緣著思惑的假相加以照察,叫作觀。憑大悲、本願、大精進力與諸佛威神加持,忽然明白開解,得到法眼之見、道種智之知,對思惑假相的病貌分別得清清楚楚。〔云云〕

以上見惑、思惑的重數雖然繁多,知道它們又有甚麼妨礙?如同五部律藏不會把人的胸中塞滿;學人面對具體因緣而行事,才能端正自己,也端正他人。學習這些句數,也是隨即學、隨即用;無論自行或化他,都能隨意運用而沒有障礙。

辨識世間法藥

第二,說明入假之人如何辨識法藥。病相無量,藥也無量;約略分為三類:一是世間法藥,二是出世間法藥,三是出世間上上法藥。

《大品般若經》說三種法施:三歸、五戒、十善道、四禪、無量心等,叫作世間法施;第二是出世間法施;第三是出世間上上法施。其義可以依此知道。〔云云〕

《大智度論》問:用世間法布施有何恩惠?好比王子從高處墜下,父王疼愛憐念他,便在地上堆積絲帛棉絮接住他,使他免受痛苦。眾生也是如此,本來將墮入三惡道,聖人憐憫他們,便以世間善法作為權宜接引,使他們免墮惡趣。

凡愚本來不知道怎樣布施法藥;世間的善法,都是聖人寄託形跡、示現為凡人,在沒有佛出世的時代誘導教誨初學。《大涅槃經》說,一切世間外道的經書都是佛所說,並不是外道自己所說。《金光明經》說,一切世間所有善論,都由這部經而來。若能深刻認識世間法,世間法也就是佛法。為甚麼?把十善收束起來,就是五戒;深入理解五常與五行的義理,也與五戒相近。

仁是慈愛矜恤、養護眾生,不傷害他人,便是不殺生戒;義是謙讓廉潔,把自己所有施惠給別人,便是不偷盜戒;禮制定規矩,男女結髮成婚,便是不邪婬戒;智是鑒照明利,行事正直,合乎中道理則,便是不飲酒戒;信是守約、如實記錄,誠實有節、不欺騙人,便是不妄語戒。周公、孔子建立這五常,作為世間法藥,救治世人的病。

五行也與五戒相似:不殺生防護木,不偷盜防護金,不邪婬防護水,不妄語防護土,不飲酒防護火。五經也與五戒相似:《禮》說撙節,防止飲酒;《樂》使心和諧,防止邪婬;《詩》以風雅諷刺過失,防止殺生;《尚書》闡明義與讓,防止偷盜;《易》測度陰陽,防止妄語。

菩薩要把這一類世間智慧之法精通到極處,使人不能超越、不能勝過,眾人全都信服,然後以師者身分引導他們。出假菩薩要知道這些法,應當另在通明觀中專心勤修。憑著大悲誓願、精進不懈與諸佛威神加持,他忽然明白開解,對世間法藥永遠不再疑惑滯礙。

然而世間法藥不是究竟的治療。即使一步步行去,幾乎走盡三有,最後仍會退回原處。所以說,凡夫雖修有漏禪,心行仍有破漏,如同漏器;縱使生到非想天,仍會退還,如同彩衣被雨淋濕,顏色斑駁脫落。世間醫生縱然把病治好,病癒之後仍會再發,說的正是這件事。

辨識出世間法藥

其次,說明怎樣知道出世間法藥。《大涅槃經》列舉不同說法:有時說信是道,有時說樂欲,有時說不放逸,有時說精進,有時說身念處,有時說正定,有時說修無常,有時說居住阿蘭若寂靜處,有時說為他人說法,有時說持戒,有時說親近善友,有時說修慈等。這些都可以成為對治的藥。

諸經有時以一道為藥,例如一行三昧。又如佛告訴比丘,不要取他人的東西;一切法都是他人的東西,對一切法都不領受、執取,便成阿羅漢。前面所說單見、複見等一切見,都不接受。也有以二道為藥,就是定愛與智策兩輪平等;以三法為藥,就是戒、定、慧;以四法為藥,就是四念處;以五法為藥,就是五力;以六法為藥,就是六念;又有七覺支、八正道、九想、十智。如此依數目遞增而說道法,乃至八萬四千法門,多得不可稱數。

可以有眾多個一法,乃至無量個一法、不可說個一法;也可以有眾多個十法、無量個十法、不可說個十法。這每一法都有種種名稱、種種相狀、種種對治作用,出假菩薩全須辨識清楚。他為眾生聚集各種法藥,猶如熟悉大海的導師;若不知道,便不能利益眾生。為了知道這一切,菩薩一心通修止觀,具足大悲誓願與精進力,再蒙諸佛威神加持,法眼開發,一切都能了知,如同觀看掌中的果實。

辨識出世間上上法藥

再說出世間上上法藥。若以一法止觀為藥,就是一實諦。無明心與法性和合,便有一切病相;觀察這個法性,連法性自身也沒有可執的法性,何況無明與其餘一切法。

若以二法為藥,就是止與觀;體認通達心性,虛妄便止息。

若以三法為藥,就是止、觀與隨順正道的戒;這種戒能自然運作,防護行人。又有三三昧:從假入空,叫作空三昧;在空中也不見有空相,叫作無相三昧;生死之業止息,叫作無作三昧。

若以四法為藥,就是四念處。種種見都依於色,而這個色既不是污穢,也不是不污穢;見惑、思惑所成的受,既不是苦,也不是樂;種種見的想與行,既不是我,也不是無我;見惑、思惑的心尚且不是心,哪裡可以說它是常或無常?

若以五法為藥,就是五根。修止觀時沒有疑惑,叫作信根;常念止觀,不念其他事情,叫作念根;止觀不止息,叫作精進根;一心安住於定,叫作定根;以四句體會通達一切法沒有自性,叫作慧根。五根增長,便叫作五力。

若以六法為藥,就是六念處。以止觀覺察見惑、思惑當下就是佛法界,不破壞法身,叫作念佛;經常憶持止觀,不分別止與觀是一或是異,叫作念法;止觀之理和合,呈現無為之相,叫作念僧;止觀之中具備隨順正道的戒,叫作念戒;止觀當下就是第一義,叫作念天;止觀捨離見惑、思惑,叫作念捨。

若以七法為藥,止就是除覺分、捨覺分、定覺分,觀就是擇法覺分、喜覺分、精進覺分,念覺分通於止觀兩邊。

若以八法為藥,以四句破假,叫作正見;由此發動正見,叫作正思惟;依這止觀修行,叫作正業;宣說這止觀,叫作正語;不用邪曲諂媚的方式養活身命,叫作正命;不離開也不忘失止觀,叫作正念;止叫作正定;念念相續而沒有間斷,叫作正精進。

若以九法為藥,四種見就是污穢的五陰;五陰變壞,叫作色變想,由此依次展開到第九想。〔云云〕

若以十法為藥,就是十智。見惑、思惑兩種假是集智與苦智;止觀是道智;二十五有不再出生是滅智;知道三界一切處都是這樣,是比智;依世間名字而說,是世智;知道其他眾生也是這樣,是他心智;知道諸法各有差別,是等智;知道苦集已經窮盡,是盡智;無漏的智慧,是無生智。

應當知道,止觀為利益眾生,可以隨根機增多或減少;既能開作十種,也能開作如恒河沙數的佛法。這好比神農品嘗草藥,建立藥方:有時用一味藥,有時用兩味藥,乃至用十味藥,也有用眾多藥合成一方。藥方依病而立,並不是沒有因緣。入假菩薩也是如此,知道一法、二法乃至無量法門;有時對治一種病,有時對治兼雜的病。

又如各種藥材,皮、肉、汁、果、根、莖、枝、葉,各有不同作用;山中、海中、水上、陸地,以及四方土地,各有自己的出產;採集、挖掘,取乾、取濕,也各有適當時節;每一種藥,又各有它所能治的病。入假菩薩知道眾生的根性,辨識適合他的法,也是這樣。菩薩審察知道:這一法乃至多法,是這位眾生所樂欲,另一法或二法不是他所樂欲;這一法或二法對他方便適宜,另一法或二法並不適宜;這是對治,那不是對治;這能使他進入第一義,那不能使他進入第一義。

要治一種病,一味藥便足夠;要成為大醫王,便須遍知一切藥。二乘人只要治自己的惑,一法便足夠;菩薩發大誓願,所以必須知道一切。又如大地生產藥材,醫師仍須斟酌分量,配成藥方;又如大河之水,仍須量作升合,不可過量,也不可不足。法藥也是如此:從一種寂定開出無量止,從一種大慧開出無量觀,全都真實不虛。

眾生致病的因緣種種不同,各種病的苦痛種種不同,各種藥方與治法種種不同,病得痊癒的因緣也種種不同。以湯藥飲服,或催吐、瀉下,或用針刺、火炙、丸、散,獲得痊癒的因緣不只一種。入假菩薩也是如此:知道一切眾生見思煩惱的積集各不相同,就是知集;知道一切眾生善惡所感的苦果各不相同,就是知苦;知道一切法門,就是知道道;知道一切眾生證入寂滅各不相同,就是知滅。對種種四諦,入假菩薩沒有一樣不知道。

卷第六上下交界

摩訶止觀卷第六〔上〕

摩訶止觀卷第六〔下〕

隋天台智者大師說

門人灌頂記

神農留下的原方,用來治療後世之人,未必全都有效。華他、扁鵲會觀察時勢、觀察藥性,另立新方。為甚麼?鄉土有南北之別,人的體質有柔弱、強健之別,飲食有鹹淡之別,藥性有濃淡之別,疾病有輕重之別;只依原方治療,不能收到功效,隨時重新制方,反而能使病痊癒。

佛最初出世時,眾生根機成熟;佛順應根機說法,沒有不能悟入的。後代人心日益澆薄,情執與惑障逐漸轉變;若只把佛經原文直接用在他們身上,對他們便沒有利益。菩薩觀察根機,疏通經義而造論,使眾生得悟。能令對方悟入而得利益,才是入假的真正用意,怎能死守舊方,反而堵塞教化之道?《大智度論》說,依隨經中法義,廣立種種名目而加以解說,便叫作法施。菩薩為了修得這種智慧,以大悲誓願與勤勉精進之力,通修止觀;又蒙諸佛威神加持,忽然照鑒明朗,對入假智得到自在。

依病授與世間法藥

第三,說明依病授藥。菩薩既知道苦、集二諦所顯的病,又辨識道、滅二諦所顯的藥。倘若眾生沒有出世的根機,根性薄弱,不能承受深法,菩薩便只授予世間法藥。

例如孔丘、姬旦制定君臣名分,確定父子倫理,使人在上者受敬重、在下者得愛護,世間因此大治。禮法與律則建立節度,使尊卑各有次序,這是在扶助戒;音樂調和人心,轉移風氣、改變習俗,這是在扶助定;先王最高的德行與切要之道,則是在扶助慧。上古混沌初開,眾生尚不適宜接受出世法;邊遠地區根性未熟,不能感得佛陀出興。佛便派遣三位聖人前往真丹教化,先以禮義開導,然後眾人才可能信受大乘、小乘經典。真丹如此,十方世界也是如此,所以先把世間法授給眾生。〔云云〕

依四種根性授出世法藥

其次授予出世間法藥。由十種因緣所成的眾生根性各不相同,也就是他們的病各不相同;病既不同,所授的藥也不同,分為下根、中根、上根、上上根。

下根有四個特徵:第一,志向與樂欲狹小低劣;第二,修行力量微弱;第三,五濁障礙深重;第四,智慧極為遲鈍。因為樂於小法,便為他說生滅法;因為行力微弱,便教他修事相上的六度;因為五濁障重,便教他勤苦對治;因為智慧遲鈍,便以斷除婬欲、瞋怒、愚癡叫作解脫。這是授予因緣所生法的藥,治療下根人的病。

即使同屬下根,所欣樂的內容仍不相同,所以諸聖造論,又開為四門。喜歡聽有的人,為他說《阿毘曇》,使他生起小乘善根、破除五濁,藉此方便得見真諦。喜歡聽無的人,為他說《成實論》,使他生起小善、破惡入真。喜歡聽亦有亦無的人,為他說《昆勒論》,使他生善、破惡、入真。喜歡聽非有非無的人,為他說《離有無經》,也使他生善、破惡、入真。入假菩薩因此作四部論,申明四門,授予四種藥,治療各類病。〔云云〕

其次,給中根人授藥。這種人的心志稍強,行力稍勝,適宜生起理善;五濁障礙較輕,智慧也稍微銳利。菩薩順應他的樂欲,為他說因緣所生法當下即空;他聽聞後生起理善,破除惡因,得見第一義。這就是授予即空之藥,治療中根人的病。中根又分下、中、上、上上四等,正如從四門進入同一座池,可以比照前文理解。〔云云〕

其次,觀察上根人而授藥。這種人樂欲廣大,善根開展,五濁已經除去,智慧也大。菩薩便授予無量四諦,使他生起界外善根,依次斷除五住煩惱,進入中道。這就是授予即假之藥,治療上根人的病。其中又分四等,也就是從四門授藥,可以比照上文知道。

其次,觀察上上根而授藥。這種人的樂欲乃至智慧都無人能及,所以叫作上上。菩薩依照實理,直接為他說法;善如虛空而生,障如虛空而滅,使他進入究竟道。這叫作授予即中之藥,治療上上根人的病;其中同樣有四門,用來授藥治病。〔云云〕

若在入空觀中,尚且沒有一法可得,哪裡會有這許多法?如今說十六種道諦、滅諦,正是為了對治十六種苦諦、集諦,所以正屬從空入假。菩薩隨順各類眾生的音聲,以微妙音聲普遍告知,使對方的耳識發動,法音轉入其心,使他服行法藥,各自得到利益。這如同一片雲降下同一場雨,各種草木卻各依自身根性得到生長。〔云云〕

入假位:先分四教三根

第四,說明入假的位次。這又分三項:第一,歷經四教判定位次;第二,說明所得利益;第三,總結從空入假的破法遍。

人們都認為:先除見惑,後除思惑;就連入空所得的果位都還遙遠,出假教化眾生更不是自己所能做到。於是望見高崖便自行斷絕前路。現在應當分別,入假的位次並不只有一種。

三乘人在最初都不愚於佛法,也都想求成佛;雖厭患生死,卻往往退轉。好比許多人一同聽說遠方有一座七寶山,便翹首嚮往、整束雙足準備前行;一想到道路艱難危險,便退縮不前。修行人也是這樣,因畏懼生死,從大乘退落而沉入空中。後來聽見菩薩殊勝微妙的功德,反觀自己已成敗壞的種子,便悲泣得震動大千世界,不必等待外在原因,內心已充滿憂悔。若只依這一種說法,修行便只有入空,不會再有入假的事。

三藏教的三根

三藏教菩薩在初阿僧祇劫修空時,好比狼制伏煩惱之羊,只伏煩惱而不斷結使。若斷盡結使,便不再有以六度功德養成的身軀,這是初阿僧祇劫的位次。到第二阿僧祇劫,煩惱之脂逐漸消減,功德之身更加肥盛;到第三阿僧祇劫,才正式進入假位,利益眾生。這是下根人。

中根人在第二阿僧祇劫,已伏煩惱,並以六度養成肥盛的功德身,當時便能教化眾生,何必等到第三阿僧祇劫?上根人在初發心時,就為度一切眾生而誓求作佛;因為聽他人說法,心中已經明白,深刻認識真理。為了度人,他不求先斷惑取證。其心又轉進一層:我應當度他,不應不度;所以應勤勉分別一切藥與一切病。為甚麼?因為慈悲、誓願、智慧、方便、精進五事深重。這好比帶著孩子走過險處,自己既已安穩,怎能把孩子丟下?菩薩雖然自己知道空,卻不捨棄眾生,所以初發心便能入假,不必等到第二阿僧祇劫。

通教的三根

判通教位時,很多人執著經文說,八地才修出假;也有人說,六地、七地斷結,與阿羅漢相同之後,才修出假。這只是一條路徑的說法,必定不能涵蓋全部。佛只是依三種根性分別宣說。

下根人要斷盡煩惱,才能出假。佛在《法華經》中破除二乘人取著涅槃的心,勸他們發無上道心、生起方便智慧。二乘既須如此,最鈍的菩薩也應按這種方式說;如今只把這判作下根。中根人斷除見惑後,生死逼迫稍得寬緩,思惑也會自然漸斷;第二地叫作菩薩神通,從此以後便能入假。上根人在初發心時,憑聞慧便能體會見思惑當下即空,也已成為眾生可以依止之處,何必等到七地才出假?

如果一定要到七地才出假,便是《大品般若經》所呵責的情形。經中譬喻,有一隻大鳥身長三百由旬,卻沒有兩翼,從天上墜落,將受死亡或等同死亡的苦。菩薩也是如此:從初發心起,一向專修空,到了六地,只把空、無相、無作三空的身軀養得肥大,入假的翅膀卻沒有長出。若墮入二乘方便道,叫作等同死亡之苦;若墮入初果,叫作死亡。見惑斷盡,是等同死亡;證得無學,則是真正死亡。那隻鳥還想回到天上,辦得到嗎?一旦墮入無學地,想再發菩薩心,永遠不能做到,如同被閹割的人,不能再享受五欲。

《華嚴經》、《大品般若經》都不能醫治這種情形,只有《法華經》能使無學人重新生起善根,成就佛道,所以稱為妙。又,一闡提尚且有心,還可以作佛;二乘人滅了智心,心不能再生。《法華經》能夠醫治這一病,所以再一次稱為妙。〔云云〕

別教的三根

別教人在十住心之後,到了十行位,才修入假的方便。為甚麼?進入真理的般若叫作住;安住此理而生起功德,叫作行。這是下根。〔云云〕

中根人在十住初發心時便能入假;既已得到無漏,一經納受便不再退轉,當下就能出而起用,何必等到十行位才生起大悲?這是中根。〔云云〕

上根的別教人,在初發心時便不愚於佛法;他通達理解一切功德猶如幻化,不受名言文字滯礙,仍修種種方便;又具足前述五種因緣,所以能利益眾生。

圓教從初心得入假

圓教行人到了十信六根清淨時,便能周遍見聞十法界的一切事。若只是入空,尚且沒有一物;既說六根能夠互用,當然已是入假的位次。又,五品弟子正行六度,能夠廣為說法,也就是入假之位,何必等到六根清淨?又,初發心人便能知道如來祕密之藏,圓觀三諦,尚且能當下即中,怎會不能當下即假?《大品般若經》說,初坐道場時,便已成就正覺、轉動法輪、度脫眾生。再以六即分別,也已顯出出假的義理,何必等到五品?

以上四教各有下、中、上三種入假位。若要固定判一個代表位,應取下根來說,理由有二:第一,這是依教相次第而判;第二,到了這一位便決定不再退轉。中根、上根雖可能較早成就入假之行,卻有時前進、有時退轉,所以不用他們來定判一教的入假位。

三種入空與三諦出入

既然有三根出假,照例也應有三根入空。這三種是情入、似入、真入。情入,是說這一類人都能以情解入空,不是指散亂凡情。他以緣真諦的觀,在相似證入與真實證入之前,先與空的法塵相應。

有人問:若只是情入,有甚麼利益?

回答:它有情解相應的利益。

又問:既然有利益,是否就不會退失?

回答:不會一概退失;即使有人退失,仍能憶念空觀而反覆修習,後來終會得到大利益。

又問:通教、別教的上根都能入空、出假,與圓教有甚麼不同?

回答:通教人能出空、入假,卻不能當下即中;別教人依次第出入,不能一心具足;圓教人能在一心中出入,也能分別有所出入。所謂分別出入,是有時多入中、少入空假二諦,有時多入空假二諦、少入中;有時多入空與中、少入假,有時多入假、少入空與中;有時多入假與中、少入空,有時多入空、少入假與中。雖然三諦的分量各有增減,三諦始終不缺。

又問:這樣一來,不就成為次第分別了嗎?

回答:圓教尚且能示現較殊勝的次第別相,何況不能示現較低的次第別相?圓融並不妨礙差別運用。

入假的利益

第二,說明入假的利益。菩薩本來不是因為珍重空而修空,而是為眾生才修空;正因不以空為可貴,所以不住在空中;正因要利益眾生,所以必須從空走出。於是他能從真理生起應化,以法眼契合根機。

應以佛身得度的人,菩薩便示現佛身,為他說法授藥;應以菩薩、二乘、天、龍、八部等身形得度的人,便為他示現相應身形。能如此成就眾生、清淨佛國土,才叫作利益。

三藏教菩薩雖然也出假,所得的仍是有漏神通,不是從真理生起的應化;他用世間智慧分別,也不是法眼明照。雖能利益眾生,卻還不能真正成就眾生;雖作佛事,也還不是清淨佛土。那只是少分教化,所得利益十分微小。〔云云〕

通教菩薩入假,雖能分別藥與病,卻只依真、俗二諦;診察病情不夠深,辨識法藥不夠遠。他的神通仍由作意而起,不是從真理自然生起的應化。

真正的應化有始有終:菩薩先示現為眾生的父母、師長,生生世世結下法緣,處處調伏他們,動輒經過無量阿僧祇劫。等善根成熟,便示現降生王宮,在道樹下成佛,以漸教、頓教度人,直到示現入涅槃,舍利留住世間。如此長久利益,有始有終,才叫作應。倏忽從無而有,短暫出現又消失,並不是真應;只給一時片段利益,不能叫作成就;最後灰身而入寂滅,也不能叫作清淨佛土。

別教十行入假,利益的意義與通教相同。到了登地時,便能得到如來一身、無量身,澄然寂靜而應現一切。這時知道病,能窮盡疾病的淵源;這時辨識藥,能窮盡法藥府藏;這時依病授藥,如印合印,絲毫不差。真實的道種智、最殊勝的法眼,使一切應化自然遍及眾生。

菩薩和光同塵,是結緣的開始;示現八相成道,是一期教化的終點。這既叫作化,也叫作應。凡見聞他的人,無不得到利益;他的一切施為都在清淨佛國土,入假的利益真實不虛。初地既然如此,其後各地也可依例知道;乃至圓教初住入假,已能給予真實利益,直到最後心也是如此。

分辨真應與邪化

明白這個意思,便能在判別變化時辨識真偽。為甚麼?魔也能以有漏心變作無漏的形貌,示現佛像。老子西行,也有人說他曾作佛教化胡人;各種外道還能把帝釋變成羊,把河水停放在耳中。世間智慧所得的五通,沒有甚麼不能造作;這類邪化無量無邊,尚且不及三藏教的五通變化,怎能算作別教、圓教自然運作的真實應化?

變化之說有許多種,沒有法眼的人容易錯誤信受。若能深細觀察,便不可把它們混為一談。因此應當知道,從法身地垂示應身,在十法界度脫眾生,這才是入假的真實利益位。

從空入假的破法遍

第三,總結破法遍。在真實智慧尚未發起以前,眾生隨自己所計著的內容,生出百千萬種見,全都叫作見惑。這如同盲人詢問乳的顏色,所答並不是乳的真色;又如摸象的人說象像繩或像杵,哪裡觸及整頭象的實情?也像病中胡言亂語。這些見本身就是假,所以要歷經單四見、複四見、具足四見,一一用觀破除。若破得不周遍,便不能入空;見惑、思惑都窮盡,才叫作破法遍。

若只從文字次第來說,彷彿必須這樣逐層破除;真正的意思卻不只如此。見惑、思惑當下就是無明,無明當下就是法性。見思破,也就是無明破;無明破,也就是得見法性。進入實相之空,才叫作破法遍。

從空入假所說的破法遍也是如此。假有之中,有無量病法、無量藥法、無量授藥法;對這三類法作分別時,只要還有一處不能通達,就不能叫作破法遍。在法眼尚未發起以前,雖能有所分別,所見仍然只及一部分,也不能叫作遍破。

到了六根清淨時,分別一種病,便能知道其中有多少種類;理解一句法,便能通達無量句;十方諸佛同時說法,也能在一時全部受持。這是相似位所得的一分氣息。等障礙不思議化道神通的無知也被破除,能同時照見真、俗二諦,才真正叫作破法遍。

總要而言,依次第一層層破,仍不能叫作遍;不依次第、當下周遍地破,才叫作遍。前面所列觀法層層重疊,數量很多,恐怕使人迷失,所以在入空觀、入假觀兩重觀法之後,才以破法遍作總結。

Why Move from the Contemplation of Emptiness into the Contemplation of the Provisional

Second is the explanation of entering the provisional from emptiness and thereby accomplishing pervasive breaking through Dharmas. This part has four divisions: first, explaining the intent of entering the provisional; second, explaining the conditions that make entry possible; third, explaining the contemplation for entering the provisional; and fourth, determining its stages.

Entering the provisional has two forms. In one, a person simply proceeds from contemplation of emptiness into contemplation of the provisional. In the other, one knows that emptiness is itself not a real Dharma to which one can cling; one therefore breaks attachment to emptiness and enters contemplation of the provisional. The wisdom and severance of delusion attained by people of the Two Vehicles can likewise realize the truth, but because they lack great compassion they are not called bodhisattvas. The Avataṃsaka Sūtra says that people of the Two Vehicles can also realize the true nature and marks of all dharmas, yet cannot on that account be called buddhas. In terms of their own cultivation, the Two Vehicles have a share in entering emptiness; in terms of transforming beings, they lack the function of emerging from emptiness and entering the provisional.

A bodhisattva enters emptiness from the provisional and breaks his own bondage and attachment, thereby differing from ordinary beings. He then enters the provisional from emptiness and breaks the bondage and attachment of others, thereby differing from the Two Vehicles. Dwelling amid the myriad existents without being stained, he discerns Dharma medicine with the Dharma eye, matches compassion to beings’ illnesses, loves beings without boundary, helps all living beings without weariness, and employs his mind in complete freedom. Such skillful means resemble planting a tree in empty space. They also resemble lying back and shooting arrows into the sky, each later arrow’s nock catching the preceding arrow so that it does not fall to the ground. If one stops in emptiness, one can never benefit beings. Resolving to benefit others is precisely the intent of entering contemplation of the provisional.

Five Conditions Enabling Entry into the Provisional

There are, in outline, five conditions for entering the provisional.

First is profound compassion. When first breaking provisional existence, the bodhisattva sees beings bound by inversion as though imprisoned and unable to escape. He therefore arouses great compassion and cares for them as his own children. Now that he himself has severed delusion and entered emptiness, he sees their suffering as his own, and his grief becomes doubly grave. In every matter he thinks of others before himself, and his wish to remove suffering and bestow happiness becomes ever more earnest.

Second is recollection of the original vow. At the outset the bodhisattva made a vast vow to remove beings’ suffering, give them happiness, and establish them in security. Beings still suffer innumerable afflictions and have not yet been delivered. Were he alone to escape suffering, he would betray his earlier resolve. Since he does not forget his original intent, how could he abandon all sentient beings? He therefore enters provisional existence, lives among beings, and guides them from within. When people of the Two Vehicles first undertook cultivation, they too were not ignorant of the Buddha Dharma and had once made great vows. But across successive lives they forgot their original resolve, retreated from the Great Vehicle, and clung to the Small Vehicle; they were therefore reproached by the sages. A bodhisattva is not like this. He resembles a mother who, on obtaining food, always remembers her children.

Third is keen and sharp wisdom. When entering contemplation of emptiness, the bodhisattva immediately knows the fault in remaining there and abandoning others. Why? If he abides in emptiness, he cannot accomplish the purification of buddha-lands, the transformation of beings, or the completion of all Buddha Dharmas. Knowing this fault, he no longer treats emptiness as ultimate and enters the provisional from emptiness.

Fourth is skillful means. A bodhisattva can enter the world. Even while living amid birth-and-death and affliction, birth-and-death and affliction cannot harm his wisdom. Every obstruction, impediment, and difficulty instead further assists his path of transformation.

Fifth is the power of great diligence. Although the Buddha path is long, the bodhisattva does not regard it as impossibly distant. Although beings are innumerable, his resolve remains vigorous. His mind is firm and irreversible; he advances diligently and is never weary or lax. These are the five conditions.

These five meanings correspond to the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra. That scripture gives three classes of similes for comforting a sick person. It first speaks of contemplating the body as impermanent and so forth, comfort through entering emptiness. It ends by saying one should become a king of physicians, comfort through entering the Middle. Between these is comfort through entering the provisional, also with five meanings. To pity others’ illness through one’s own illness is great compassion of the same body. Knowing the suffering one has undergone over innumerable past kalpas is recollection of the original vow. Thinking at every moment of benefiting all beings is knowing the fault of abiding in emptiness. Recollecting one’s cultivated merit and at every moment maintaining a pure livelihood is skillful means. Not giving rise to sorrow and distress, but constantly arousing diligence, is the fifth meaning. The meaning here corresponds to that scripture from afar, and so forth.

If compassion, vows, skillful means, and diligence—the four Dharmas other than wisdom—are lacking, one definitely cannot emerge from contemplation of emptiness. Sharp faculties, however, require separate analysis. A śrāvaka who abides in emptiness is not necessarily dull, and a bodhisattva who enters the provisional is not necessarily sharp. Śāriputra, for example, possessed keen wisdom yet did not emerge from contemplation of emptiness. Four alternatives must therefore be distinguished: sharp faculties while abiding in emptiness, dull faculties while abiding in emptiness, sharp faculties while entering the provisional, and dull faculties while entering the provisional.

It resembles a physically frail person without strength whose courage is nevertheless vigorous: he can still enter dangerous terrain and defeat the enemy, with not a single battle line able to stop him. Another person is physically strong and courageous; thrusting left and right, he is irresistible. Another has great strength but is timid and fearful; despite his strength, the moment he sees the enemy line he loses heart. Yet another has neither strength nor courage; lacking both, how could he establish any achievement? Those who abide in emptiness include the latter two types, while those who emerge into the provisional include the former two. Possessing the five conditions is like having kin to help, a compact to rely on, a strategy to use, strength to trust, and courage to act; one can therefore enter the provisional. Even when one’s wisdom is somewhat dull, possessing the other four conditions makes entry possible. A śrāvaka may possess sharp wisdom, but because all four are lacking, he cannot enter the provisional.

The Three Tasks of Contemplation in Entering the Provisional

Third is the explanation of contemplation in entering the provisional. It consists of three tasks: first, knowing illness; second, recognizing medicine; and third, administering medicine according to illness.

Knowing illness means knowing the two illnesses of views and thought. Regarding views, one must know their root, the conditions under which they arise, whether their arising is long-standing or recent, and the gravity and number of their grades.

Knowing the Illness of Views

How does one know the root of views? The view of self is the root of all views, and a single thought of deluded mind is the root of the view of self. From this deluded mind, immeasurable deviant views arise, crisscrossing and densely tangled beyond reckoning. Through these views, beings create fetters and karma of every kind, fall into the three evil destinations, and revolve in drowning without cease. This resembles the wheel of fire seen when a torch is whirled. To stop the wheel, stop the hand that whirls the torch. Know that mind originally contains no real mind; mind arises only because of deluded conception. The self originally contains no real self; a self is born only because of inversion. Once inversion and deluded conception cease, the root ceases, and its branches naturally disappear with it.

How does one know the conditions under which views arise? Because conditions differ, the views born from them also differ. How can this be known? It can be known from inner and outer characteristics. Outer characteristics include differences among the environments where beings live: seasons may be cold or hot, lands high or low, products and growth refined or coarse, and foods strong or mild. Because places differ, their resulting recompenses differ. Even within what a local region produces, there are accumulation and dispersal, abundance and scarcity, presence and absence, gain and loss, poverty and wealth, hunger and satiety, and so forth. Bodily forms likewise differ: short or tall, handsome or ugly, imposing or gaunt, healthy or ill, and so forth.

People’s faculties, preferences, and aversions also differ. One person suddenly gains honor yet casts aside office; another takes delight in gathering firewood or fishing. One strikes an ox horn while seeking ministerial rank; another carries a cooking vessel while seeking high office. Some excel in civil affairs and others in martial affairs. Some indulge in drink and others crave flavors. Some are greedy and others extravagant; some easily angry and others joyful; some foolish and others cunning. Such uneven intermixture has hundreds, thousands, and tens of thousands of forms. Even within the human path every person already differs; how much more so the other kinds of beings, which cannot be exhaustively described. These differences in dependent and direct recompense necessarily reveal differences in the karma each has made. Different karma gives rise to different views. Seeing the tip, one thus knows the root; seeing the outer characteristics, one discerns the inner causes.

How does one know whether views arose long ago or recently? Some views accumulated and layered across many births, not merely one lifetime. Some arose only in the most recent lifetime; some have just arisen in this life; and some will gradually become powerful only in the future.

How does one know the number of grades of views? From the single view of existence, distinguish the three provisionalities—formation by causes, continuity, and relation. Within each, distinguish four alternatives: existence, nonexistence, both existence and nonexistence, and neither existence nor nonexistence. The three provisionalities therefore make twelve alternatives. Each fourfold set is further distinguished by the four siddhāntas—worldly, individual, counteractive, and ultimate—so the twelve alternatives make forty-eight siddhāntas. Each siddhānta is further divided into nature-emptiness and mark-emptiness, making ninety-six kinds of nature-emptiness and mark-emptiness. Each alternative has calming and contemplation, making 192 calming-and-contemplation alternatives. Counting the preceding roots as well yields 348.

That count concerns practitioners through faith. Practitioners through Dharma are the same; those who turn from faith to Dharma are the same, and those who turn from Dharma to faith are the same. The four kinds of people together yield 1,392 alternatives. This is the count for the view of existence. The views of nonexistence, both existence and nonexistence, and neither existence nor nonexistence are the same, so the four views yield 5,568. What is true of the simple four views is also true of the compound and complete four views. These three classes yield 16,704 inexpressible views. Add the initial 1,392 for the view of existence, and the total becomes 18,096.

The foregoing are the views to be broken. The calming-and-contemplation that breaks them has the same number. Breaker and broken together therefore yield 36,192 alternatives. One’s own practice is like this, and transforming others is the same; together they yield 72,384. If the sixty-two views and eighty-eight agents are further analyzed through three provisionalities, four alternatives, and so forth, the number is immeasurable, boundless, and inexhaustible.

Although the marks of illness are immeasurable, the bodhisattva can know them all. He knows how many alternatives together constitute one view and how many constitute another. He skillfully distinguishes their depth, shallowness, gravity, and lightness without deviation or error; this is called knowing origination. Knowing origination, he also knows suffering. He thoroughly understands how suffering and origination circulate, from root to branch.

Before entering emptiness, the bodhisattva had pervasively contemplated the delusions of views and thought and understood the marks of illness in outline. He made this a preparation for emerging into the provisional, and only then severed delusion and entered emptiness through one gate. When he later emerges into the provisional and again distinctly illuminates the two delusions, this is easy. With a little cultivation of calming-and-contemplation, the Dharma eye becomes clear. People of the Two Vehicles enter emptiness through only one gate and lack this prior guidance. Later, when teaching even two disciples, they administer the wrong medicine. They also lack the foregoing five intentions; how could they enter the provisional?

The bodhisattva possesses skillful means, great compassion, the original vow, and the power of great diligence. At times he stills every deluded conception, opens the Dharma eye, and recognizes the illness of views. At times he illuminates and penetrates the Dharmas of views, arousing wisdom of the varieties of the path and understanding all forms of delusion. If awakening has not yet occurred, he diligently investigates calming-and-contemplation through the power of diligence. When inner conditions mature and the buddhas provide outer support, he suddenly awakens, whether obscurely or openly. From then on, every alternative among the illnesses of views is perfectly clear, like all visible forms appearing in a mirror. Whether recognizing himself or others, he examines them clearly and without obstruction.

Knowing the Illness of Thought

Next, one must know the root of the illness of thought, the conditions under which it arises, whether its arising is long-standing or recent, and the gravity and number of its grades. The first three can be understood by analogy with the illness of views, except that the provisional marks of thought take delusion as their root, and so forth.

As for the grades of thought, the nine grounds of the three realms contain eighty-one grades. Consider first a single grade. This grade has three provisionalities, each with four alternatives of calming-and-contemplation, making twelve. Each alternative also has the two types of understanding through faith and attainment through seeing, and each type employs the four siddhāntas. Practice through faith and practice through Dharma thus each have eight rounds, sixteen together. Each can also turn into the other, producing another sixteen, for thirty-two altogether. Since one alternative expands to thirty-two, the twelve alternatives of the three provisionalities yield 384. Each also has the two emptinesses of nature and mark, making 768. Add the preceding number to make 1,152; include the roots themselves to make 1,164.

One grade is like this, so nine grades yield 10,476. The nine grades of the desire realm are like this; extending them through the nine grounds of the three realms yields 94,284. The number to be broken is like this, and the breaking contemplation is the same; together they yield 188,568. One’s own practice is like this, and transforming others is the same; together they yield 277,136 alternatives of calming-and-contemplation.

On closer analysis, every grade contains immeasurable grades and every dhyāna immeasurable dhyānas. The meditative concentrations of luminous insight, the eight liberations, and the rest are already beyond exhaustive description merely when their various states arise. How much more difficult would it be to count the three provisionalities, four kinds of contemplation, and other alternatives within every dhyāna and grade? If the delusions of views are compared to forty li of water, thought conditions only one truth and should be compared to ten li. Because it does not arise laterally, it is called a single drop. Yet its grades are truly numerous and can still be said to fill ten li of water.

People of the Two Vehicles enter emptiness directly and therefore make no such distinctions. When bodhisattvas first broke the provisionality of thought, they prepared the means in advance and already knew the whole in outline. Now, emerging from emptiness into the provisional, they again cultivate contemplation to assist the opening of the Dharma eye, using calming-and-contemplation throughout as the gate for knowing provisional existence. If cultivated separately, each has its method. Stilling every condition and thought is called calming. Taking the provisional marks of thought as conditions and illuminating them is called contemplation. Through great compassion, the original vow, the power of great diligence, and the empowering majesty of the buddhas, the bodhisattva suddenly understands and opens. He gains the vision of the Dharma eye and the knowledge of wisdom of the varieties of the path, clearly distinguishing the illness-marks of the provisionality of thought, and so forth.

Although the foregoing counts of the delusions of views and thought are elaborate, what obstruction is there in knowing them? The five divisions of the Vinaya do not stuff a person’s chest full. Only by acting according to concrete conditions can a student correct himself and others. The same is true of learning these counted alternatives: one learns and immediately applies them. Whether in one’s own practice or in transforming others, they can be employed at will and without obstruction.

Recognizing Worldly Dharma Medicine

Second is the explanation of how one entering the provisional recognizes Dharma medicine. The marks of illness are immeasurable, and medicines are likewise immeasurable. In outline, they fall into three classes: worldly Dharma medicine, supramundane Dharma medicine, and supramundane supreme Dharma medicine.

The Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra teaches three kinds of Dharma giving. The Three Refuges, Five Precepts, ten wholesome paths of action, four dhyānas, immeasurable minds, and the like are called worldly Dharma giving. The second is supramundane Dharma giving, and the third supramundane supreme Dharma giving. Their meanings can be known accordingly, and so forth.

The Great Treatise asks: what benefit is there in giving worldly Dharmas? It resembles a prince falling from a high place. The king, his loving father, piles silk and cotton on the ground to catch him and spare him pain. Beings are the same. They are about to fall into the three evil destinations, so sages take pity on them and provisionally receive and guide them with worldly wholesome Dharmas, preventing their fall into evil destinations.

Ordinary foolish people originally did not know how to give Dharma medicine. All wholesome worldly Dharmas were taught by sages who lodged traces in the world and manifested as ordinary people to induce and instruct beginners during ages without a buddha. The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra says that all the scriptures of worldly non-Buddhists were taught by the Buddha, not by the non-Buddhists themselves. The Golden Light Sūtra says that every wholesome treatise in the world comes from that scripture. When worldly Dharmas are known deeply, worldly Dharmas are themselves Buddha Dharma. Why? Gather the ten wholesome actions, and they become the Five Precepts. A deep understanding of the five constant virtues and five phases likewise approaches the Five Precepts.

Benevolence means loving concern, pity, and nurturing beings without harming others; it is the precept against killing. Righteousness means yielding humbly, remaining incorrupt, and bestowing what one has on others; it is the precept against stealing. Ritual establishes standards, and men and women bind their hair in marriage; it is the precept against sexual misconduct. Wisdom illuminates keenly, acts uprightly, and accords with the principle of the Middle Way; it is the precept against intoxication. Trustworthiness keeps compacts, records matters as they are, remains honest and measured, and does not deceive; it is the precept against false speech. The Duke of Zhou and Confucius established these five constant virtues as worldly Dharma medicine to treat the illnesses of the people.

The five phases also resemble the Five Precepts: abstaining from killing protects wood, abstaining from stealing protects metal, abstaining from sexual misconduct protects water, abstaining from false speech protects earth, and abstaining from intoxication protects fire. The Five Classics likewise resemble the Five Precepts. The Book of Rites teaches restraint and prevents intoxication. The Book of Music harmonizes mind and prevents sexual misconduct. The Book of Odes uses airs and elegantiae to satirize faults and prevent killing. The Book of Documents clarifies righteousness and yielding and prevents stealing. The Book of Changes gauges yin and yang and prevents false speech.

A bodhisattva must master such forms of worldly wisdom to their utmost, so that no one can surpass or defeat him and everyone trusts him; only then can he guide them as a teacher. A bodhisattva emerging into the provisional must know these Dharmas and should cultivate them diligently and single-mindedly within the contemplation of luminous insight. Through compassionate vows, tireless diligence, and the empowering majesty of the buddhas, he suddenly understands and opens, never again doubting or becoming obstructed by worldly Dharma medicine.

Worldly Dharma medicine, however, is not the ultimate treatment. Even if one advances step by step and nearly reaches the end of the three existences, one eventually returns to the starting point. Thus, although ordinary beings cultivate contaminated meditative concentrations, their mental conduct still leaks and breaks like a cracked vessel. Even if they are born in the Heaven of Neither Perception nor Nonperception, they fall back again, like colored clothing soaked by rain until its hues mottle and peel away. A worldly physician may cure an illness, but after recovery it returns. This is precisely what is meant.

Recognizing Supramundane Dharma Medicine

Next is the explanation of how to know supramundane Dharma medicine. The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra lists different teachings. At times it says faith is the path; at other times aspiration, heedfulness, diligence, mindfulness of the body, right concentration, cultivation of impermanence, dwelling in the quiet of an araṇya, teaching Dharma to others, keeping precepts, approaching good spiritual friends, or cultivating loving-kindness and the rest. Each can be a counteractive medicine.

The scriptures sometimes take one path as medicine, as with the samādhi of one practice. The Buddha also told the bhikṣus not to take what belongs to others. All Dharmas belong to others: by neither accepting nor grasping any Dharma, one becomes an arhat. None of the simple, compound, or other views discussed above is accepted. Two paths can also serve as medicine: the two wheels of concentration’s moistening and wisdom’s spur are balanced. Three Dharmas are medicine: ethical discipline, concentration, and wisdom. Four are medicine: the four foundations of mindfulness. Five are medicine: the five powers. Six are medicine: the six recollections. There are also the seven factors of awakening, Eightfold Path, nine perceptions, and ten knowledges. Thus the Dharmas of the path are taught in increasing numerical order, up to the 84,000 Dharma gates, too many to count.

There can be many single Dharmas, immeasurable single Dharmas, and inexpressibly many single Dharmas. There can likewise be many tenfold Dharmas, immeasurable tenfold Dharmas, and inexpressibly many tenfold Dharmas. Every Dharma has its various names, marks, and counteractive functions. A bodhisattva emerging into the provisional must clearly recognize all of them. He gathers every Dharma medicine for beings like a guide thoroughly familiar with the ocean; without such knowledge he cannot benefit beings. To know them all, the bodhisattva single-mindedly cultivates calming-and-contemplation throughout, possesses compassionate vows and the power of diligence, and receives the empowering majesty of the buddhas. The Dharma eye opens, and he can know everything as plainly as seeing a fruit in his palm.

Recognizing Supramundane Supreme Dharma Medicine

Next comes supramundane supreme Dharma medicine. When one Dharma of calming-and-contemplation serves as medicine, it is the single truth of reality. The mind of ignorance combines with Dharma-nature, and every mark of illness appears. Contemplate this Dharma-nature: even Dharma-nature itself contains no Dharma-nature to be grasped, much less ignorance and all other Dharmas.

When two Dharmas serve as medicine, they are calming and contemplation. Embodying and penetrating mind-nature, delusion ceases.

When three Dharmas serve as medicine, they are calming, contemplation, and the ethical discipline that follows the right path. This discipline functions naturally and protects the practitioner. There are also the three samādhis. Entering emptiness from the provisional is the samādhi of emptiness. Seeing no mark of emptiness even within emptiness is the signless samādhi. The cessation of the karma of birth-and-death is the wishless samādhi.

When four Dharmas serve as medicine, they are the four foundations of mindfulness. Every view relies on form, yet this form is neither impure nor not impure. Feeling produced by the delusions of views and thought is neither suffering nor pleasure. The perceptions and formations within every view are neither self nor no-self. Since the mind of views and thought is not even mind, how could it be called permanent or impermanent?

When five Dharmas serve as medicine, they are the five faculties. Having no doubt while cultivating calming-and-contemplation is the faculty of faith. Constantly remembering calming-and-contemplation and not thinking of other matters is the faculty of mindfulness. Calming-and-contemplation never ceasing is the faculty of diligence. Abiding one-pointedly in concentration is the faculty of concentration. Embodying and penetrating through four alternatives that all Dharmas lack self-nature is the faculty of wisdom. When the five faculties grow, they are called the five powers.

When six Dharmas serve as medicine, they are the six recollections. Using calming-and-contemplation to awaken to the fact that views and thought are immediately the Buddha Dharma realm and do not damage the Dharma body is recollection of the Buddha. Constantly retaining calming-and-contemplation without distinguishing calming and contemplation as identical or different is recollection of Dharma. The principle of calming-and-contemplation harmoniously revealing the mark of the unconditioned is recollection of the Saṅgha. Calming-and-contemplation possessing ethical discipline that follows the right path is recollection of ethical discipline. Calming-and-contemplation being immediately the ultimate is recollection of deities. Calming-and-contemplation abandoning views and thought is recollection of relinquishment.

When seven Dharmas serve as medicine, calming comprises the factors of tranquility, equanimity, and concentration; contemplation comprises the factors of investigation of Dharmas, joy, and diligence; and the factor of mindfulness extends through both calming and contemplation.

When eight Dharmas serve as medicine, breaking provisionality through four alternatives is right view. The arousal produced by this right view is right intention. Practicing according to this calming-and-contemplation is right action. Teaching this calming-and-contemplation is right speech. Sustaining one’s life without crooked flattery is right livelihood. Neither leaving nor forgetting calming-and-contemplation is right mindfulness. Calming is right concentration. Continuity from thought to thought without interruption is right effort.

When nine Dharmas serve as medicine, the four views are the impure five aggregates. The deterioration of the aggregates is the perception of a discolored corpse, from which the sequence unfolds through the ninth perception, and so forth.

When ten Dharmas serve as medicine, they are the ten knowledges. The two provisionalities of views and thought are knowledge of origination and knowledge of suffering. Calming-and-contemplation is knowledge of the path. The nonarising of the twenty-five existences is knowledge of cessation. Knowing that every place in the three realms is like this is inferential knowledge. Speaking according to worldly names is worldly knowledge. Knowing that other beings are likewise is knowledge of others’ minds. Knowing the distinctions among all Dharmas is differentiated knowledge. Knowing that suffering and origination have been exhausted is knowledge of exhaustion. Uncontaminated wisdom is knowledge of nonarising.

Know that calming-and-contemplation can be increased or decreased according to faculties for the benefit of beings. It can be unfolded as ten or as Buddha Dharmas as numerous as the sands of the Ganges. This resembles Shennong tasting medicinal plants and establishing prescriptions: sometimes one ingredient is used, sometimes two, up to ten, while other formulas combine many medicines. Prescriptions are established according to illness, never without conditions. Bodhisattvas entering the provisional are the same. They know one Dharma, two Dharmas, up to immeasurable Dharma gates, sometimes treating one illness and sometimes a mixed illness.

Medicinal substances likewise have bark, flesh, sap, fruit, roots, stems, branches, and leaves, each with a different function. Mountains, seas, water, land, and the soils of the four directions each produce their own substances. Gathering, digging, taking them dry or moist—all have suitable seasons. Each medicine also has the illnesses it can treat. A bodhisattva entering the provisional knows beings’ faculties and recognizes the Dharma suited to each in just this way. He examines and knows that one or many Dharmas accord with this being’s aspirations, while another one or two do not; that one or two are suitable means for him, while another one or two are not; that this is counteractive and that is not; that this can bring him into the ultimate and that cannot.

To treat one illness, one medicine is enough. To become a great king of physicians, one must pervasively know every medicine. People of the Two Vehicles need only treat their own delusion, so one Dharma is enough. Bodhisattvas make great vows and therefore must know all. The earth may produce medicinal substances, yet a physician must still determine their quantities and combine them into prescriptions. A great river contains water, yet it must still be measured in sheng and ge, neither excessive nor deficient. Dharma medicine is the same. One concentration of quiescence unfolds as immeasurable calming practices, and one great wisdom unfolds as immeasurable contemplations, all true and without falsity.

The conditions that make beings ill differ in every way; the pains of their illnesses, their prescriptions and treatments, and the conditions of their recovery all differ. Medicines may be drunk as decoctions, induce vomiting or purging, or take the form of needles, cautery, pills, or powders. The conditions of recovery are not confined to one method. Bodhisattvas entering the provisional are the same. Knowing all the different accumulations of beings’ afflictions of views and thought is knowing origination. Knowing all the different painful results caused by their wholesome and unwholesome conduct is knowing suffering. Knowing every Dharma gate is knowing the path. Knowing all the different ways beings realize quiescent cessation is knowing cessation. There is no form of the Four Truths that bodhisattvas entering the provisional do not know.

Transition between the First and Second Halves of Fascicle Six

Mohe Zhiguan, Fascicle Six 〔First Half〕

Mohe Zhiguan, Fascicle Six 〔Second Half〕

Taught by the Great Master Zhizhe of Tiantai in the Sui dynasty

Recorded by his disciple Guanding

Shennong’s original prescriptions do not necessarily cure every person of later ages. Hua Tuo and Bian Que examined the times and the properties of medicines and established new prescriptions. Why? Northern and southern regions differ; people’s constitutions are frail or robust; foods are salty or mild; medicines are strong or weak; and illnesses are light or grave. Following only an old prescription fails to produce results, while remaking prescriptions according to the time can bring recovery.

When the Buddha first appeared in the world, beings’ faculties were mature. He taught according to their faculties, and none failed to awaken and enter. In later ages, people’s minds grew increasingly shallow, and their emotional attachments and delusive obstructions gradually changed. Applying only the Buddha’s scriptural words directly to them would bring no benefit. Bodhisattvas examine faculties, open the meaning of scripture, and compose treatises so that beings awaken. Causing others to awaken, enter, and gain benefit is the true intent of entering the provisional. How could rigidly keeping an old prescription be allowed to block the path of transformation? The Great Treatise says that to establish and explain many names in accordance with the Dharma and meaning in the scriptures is Dharma giving. To cultivate this wisdom, the bodhisattva thoroughly cultivates calming-and-contemplation through compassionate vows and diligent effort. With the empowering majesty of the buddhas, illumination suddenly becomes clear, and he gains freedom in the wisdom of entering the provisional.

Administering Worldly Dharma Medicine According to Illness

Third is the explanation of administering medicine according to illness. The bodhisattva knows the illness revealed by the truths of suffering and origination and recognizes the medicine revealed by the truths of path and cessation. If beings lack supramundane faculties and are too weak to bear the profound Dharma, the bodhisattva administers only worldly Dharma medicine.

Confucius and the Duke of Zhou, for example, established the duties of ruler and minister and fixed the ethics of parent and child, so that those above were respected, those below cherished, and the world brought into good order. Rites and laws established measured standards and proper ranks, thereby assisting ethical discipline. Music harmonized minds, transformed customs, and improved habits, thereby assisting concentration. The highest virtue and essential path of the ancient kings assisted wisdom. In remote antiquity, when the world had just emerged from primal confusion, beings were not yet suited to receive supramundane Dharma. The faculties of distant lands were not mature enough to call forth a buddha’s appearance. The Buddha therefore dispatched three sages to China, first guiding people through ritual and righteousness so that they might later accept the Great- and Small-Vehicle scriptures. As in China, so throughout the worlds of the ten directions: worldly Dharmas are first given to beings, and so forth.

Administering Supramundane Dharma Medicine to Four Kinds of Faculties

Next comes the administration of supramundane Dharma medicine. Beings’ faculties, formed through ten conditions, differ; that is, their illnesses differ. Because illnesses differ, the medicines administered also differ, for lower, middling, higher, and supreme faculties.

Lower faculties have four characteristics. First, their aims and aspirations are narrow and inferior. Second, the power of their practice is weak. Third, the five turbidities obstruct them heavily. Fourth, their wisdom is extremely dull. Because they delight in lesser Dharmas, the bodhisattva teaches them arising and cessation. Because their power of practice is weak, he teaches the six perfections at the level of concrete practices. Because the five turbidities heavily obstruct them, he teaches arduous counteraction. Because their wisdom is dull, he calls the severance of sexual desire, anger, and delusion liberation. This is administering the medicine of Dharmas arisen through conditions to treat the illness of people with lower faculties.

Even among lower faculties, aspirations differ. The sages therefore composed treatises and unfolded four gates. For those who delight in hearing existence, they taught the Abhidharma, enabling them to produce Small-Vehicle wholesome roots, break the five turbidities, and through this skillful means see the truth. For those who delight in hearing nonexistence, they taught the Satyasiddhi Treatise, enabling them to produce lesser wholesome roots, break evil, and enter the true. For those who delight in hearing both existence and nonexistence, they taught the Kunle Treatise, likewise enabling them to produce wholesomeness, break evil, and enter the true. For those who delight in hearing neither existence nor nonexistence, they taught the Scripture Apart from Existence and Nonexistence, likewise enabling them to produce wholesomeness, break evil, and enter the true. Bodhisattvas entering the provisional thus composed four kinds of treatises, clarified four gates, and administered four medicines to treat each kind of illness, and so forth.

Next comes medicine for middling faculties. Their resolve is somewhat stronger and their power of practice somewhat greater, so they are suited to produce principial wholesomeness. The obstructions of the five turbidities are lighter, and their wisdom somewhat sharper. In accordance with their aspirations, the bodhisattva teaches that Dharmas arisen through conditions are immediately empty. On hearing this, they produce principial wholesomeness, break evil causes, and see the ultimate. This is administering the medicine of immediate emptiness to treat the illness of middling faculties. Middling faculties are again divided into lower, middling, higher, and supreme, just as four gates lead into the same pool; this can be understood by comparison with the foregoing, and so forth.

Next, the bodhisattva examines people with higher faculties and administers medicine. Their aspirations are vast, their wholesome roots developed, the five turbidities already removed, and their wisdom great. He administers the immeasurable Four Truths, causing them to produce wholesome roots beyond the realms, sequentially sever the afflictions of the five abodes, and enter the Middle Way. This is administering the medicine of immediate provisionality to treat the illness of higher faculties. These too have four grades, corresponding to medicine administered through the four gates, as can be known by analogy with the foregoing.

Next, he examines supreme faculties and administers medicine. Such people are unsurpassed in aspiration through wisdom and are therefore called supreme. In accordance with real principle, the bodhisattva teaches them directly. Wholesomeness arises like empty space, obstruction ceases like empty space, and they enter the ultimate path. This is administering the medicine of the immediate Middle to treat the illness of supreme faculties. It too has four gates through which medicine is administered and illness treated, and so forth.

Within contemplation for entering emptiness, not even one Dharma is obtainable; how could there be so many Dharmas? The sixteen truths of path and cessation are now taught precisely to counteract sixteen truths of suffering and origination. This therefore belongs directly to entering the provisional from emptiness. The bodhisattva follows the voices of every kind of being and universally informs them through wondrous sound. Their auditory consciousness is activated, the sound of Dharma enters their minds, they take up the Dharma medicine, and each gains benefit. This resembles one cloud releasing one rain, while the various plants and trees each grow according to their own faculties, and so forth.

Stages of Entering the Provisional: First Distinguishing Three Faculties across the Four Teachings

Fourth is the explanation of the stages of entering the provisional. It has three parts: first, determining stages across the four teachings; second, explaining the benefits attained; and third, concluding pervasive breaking through Dharmas in entering the provisional from emptiness.

People commonly assume that views must be removed first and thought afterward. Since even the fruits attained by entering emptiness seem distant, they regard emerging into the provisional to transform beings as still further beyond their capacity. On seeing such a high cliff, they cut off their own path. It must now be distinguished that the stages of entering the provisional are not limited to one pattern.

At first, practitioners of all three vehicles were not ignorant of the Buddha Dharma and all sought buddhahood. Yet while weary of birth-and-death, they often retreated. It resembles many people hearing together of a mountain of seven treasures in a distant land. They crane their heads toward it and bind their feet in readiness, but when they think of the difficult and dangerous road, they retreat and do not advance. Practitioners are the same. Fearing birth-and-death, they fall away from the Great Vehicle and sink into emptiness. Later, hearing of the bodhisattvas’ superior and wondrous merit, they see themselves as ruined seeds and weep until the great-thousand world shakes. No outer cause need appear; their minds are already filled with grief and remorse. If only this account were accepted, cultivation would entail entry into emptiness but never another entry into the provisional.

Three Faculties in the Tripiṭaka Teaching

During the first incalculable eon of cultivating emptiness, a Tripiṭaka-Teaching bodhisattva resembles a wolf subduing the sheep of affliction: he suppresses affliction but does not sever the fetters. If he exhausted the fetters, the body nourished through the merits of the six perfections could no longer remain. This is the stage of the first incalculable eon. During the second incalculable eon, the fat of affliction gradually diminishes while the body of merit becomes more robust. Only in the third incalculable eon does he formally enter the stage of the provisional and benefit beings. This is the person of lower faculties.

A person of middling faculties has already suppressed affliction and nourished a robust body of merit through the six perfections during the second incalculable eon. He can transform beings then; why wait for the third? A person of higher faculties vows at the first arousal of mind to seek buddhahood for the deliverance of all beings. Through hearing others teach, he already understands inwardly and deeply recognizes true principle. To deliver people, he does not seek first to sever delusion and obtain realization. His mind advances another step: I should deliver them and should not fail to do so; I must therefore diligently distinguish every medicine and illness. Why? Because the five—compassion, vows, wisdom, skillful means, and diligence—are profound. It resembles carrying a child across a dangerous place. Once secure oneself, how could one abandon the child? Although the bodhisattva knows emptiness for himself, he does not abandon beings. He can therefore enter the provisional at the first arousal of mind without waiting for the second incalculable eon.

Three Faculties in the Shared Teaching

In determining the stages of the Shared Teaching, many people cling to a scriptural statement that the provisional is cultivated only at the eighth ground. Others say the fetters are severed at the sixth or seventh ground, making one equal to an arhat, and only then is the provisional cultivated. This is merely one path of explanation and cannot cover everything. The Buddha distinguishes his teaching according to three faculties.

People of lower faculties must exhaust affliction before emerging into the provisional. In the Lotus Sūtra, the Buddha breaks the Two Vehicles’ attachment to nirvāṇa and exhorts them to arouse the mind of the unsurpassed path and produce the wisdom of skillful means. Since even the Two Vehicles require this, the dullest bodhisattvas should be addressed in the same manner; here it is judged only as the lower faculty. After people of middling faculties sever the delusions of views, the pressure of birth-and-death relaxes somewhat and the delusions of thought naturally diminish. The second ground is called the ground of a bodhisattva’s superknowledges; from then on, they can enter the provisional. At the first arousal of mind, people of higher faculties can embody the immediate emptiness of views and thought through wisdom born of hearing. They have already become a refuge for beings; why would they need to wait until the seventh ground to emerge into the provisional?

If one insists on waiting until the seventh ground, one falls under the rebuke in the Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra. That scripture gives the simile of a great bird three hundred yojanas long, without two wings, falling from heaven and suffering death or pain equal to death. Bodhisattvas are the same. From the first arousal of mind, they cultivate only emptiness. By the sixth ground they have nourished the body of the three emptinesses—emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness—until it is enormous, yet the wings of entering the provisional have not grown. Falling into the preparatory path of the Two Vehicles is pain equal to death; falling into the first fruit is death. Exhausting the delusions of views is equal to death; realizing the state beyond training is actual death. Could that bird still return to heaven? Once someone has fallen into the ground beyond training, seeking to arouse the bodhisattva mind again is forever impossible, like a castrated person unable to enjoy the five desires.

Neither the Avataṃsaka Sūtra nor the Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra can treat this condition. Only the Lotus Sūtra can cause those beyond training to produce wholesome roots again and accomplish the Buddha path; it is therefore called wondrous. Moreover, an icchantika still has mind and can become a buddha, while people of the Two Vehicles have extinguished the mind of wisdom, which cannot arise again. The Lotus Sūtra can treat this illness and is therefore called wondrous a second time, and so forth.

Three Faculties in the Distinct Teaching

After the mind of the ten abodes, a person of the Distinct Teaching reaches the ten practices and only then cultivates the preparatory means for entering the provisional. Why? Prajñā that enters true principle is called abode. Abiding in this principle and producing merit is called practice. This is the person of lower faculties, and so forth.

A person of middling faculties can enter the provisional at the first arousal of mind in the ten abodes. Having attained the uncontaminated, once he receives it he does not retreat; he can immediately emerge and function. Why wait until the ten practices to arouse great compassion? This is the person of middling faculties, and so forth.

A person of higher faculties in the Distinct Teaching is not ignorant of the Buddha Dharma at the first arousal of mind. He thoroughly understands that every merit is like an illusion, is not obstructed by names or words, yet still cultivates skillful means of every kind. He also possesses the five foregoing conditions and can therefore benefit beings.

The Perfect Teaching Enters the Provisional from the Initial Mind

When practitioners of the Perfect Teaching reach the purification of the six faculties within the ten faiths, they can pervasively see and hear everything in the ten Dharma realms. Were this merely entry into emptiness, not one thing would remain. Since the six faculties are said to function interchangeably, this must already be a stage of entering the provisional. Furthermore, disciples at the five grades directly practice the six perfections and can teach Dharma extensively; that too is a stage of entering the provisional, so why wait for purification of the six faculties? Again, a person at the first arousal of mind can know the Tathāgata’s secret treasury and perfectly contemplate the three truths. Since he can already be immediately the Middle, how could he not be immediately provisional? The Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra says that on first sitting at the site of awakening, one has already accomplished correct awakening, turned the Dharma wheel, and delivered beings. Distinguishing this through the six identities likewise reveals the meaning of emerging into the provisional; why wait for the five grades?

Each of the four teachings therefore has lower, middling, and higher stages for entering the provisional. If a single representative stage must be fixed, it should be that of lower faculties for two reasons. First, this accords with the teaching’s sequential structure. Second, on reaching this stage one is definitely irreversible. People of middling and higher faculties may accomplish the practice of entering the provisional earlier, but sometimes advance and sometimes retreat; their stages are therefore not used to fix the representative stage in each teaching.

Three Kinds of Entry into Emptiness and Movement among the Three Truths

Since three faculties emerge into the provisional, by analogy three faculties should also enter emptiness. These are conceptual entry, approximate entry, and true entry. Conceptual entry means that such people all enter emptiness through conceptual understanding; it does not mean the scattered emotions of ordinary beings. Through contemplation taking the truth as its object, they first correspond to the Dharma-object of emptiness before approximate and true realization.

Someone asks: If this is only conceptual entry, what benefit does it have?

Answer: It has the benefit of correspondence through conceptual understanding.

Another question: Since it has benefit, does that mean it is never lost?

Answer: It is not universally lost. Even if some lose it, they can still recall the contemplation of emptiness and cultivate it repeatedly, eventually gaining great benefit.

Another question: People of higher faculties in the Shared and Distinct teachings can both enter emptiness and emerge into the provisional. How do they differ from the Perfect Teaching?

Answer: People of the Shared Teaching can emerge from emptiness and enter the provisional, but cannot immediately be the Middle. People of the Distinct Teaching enter and emerge sequentially and cannot possess all within one mind. People of the Perfect Teaching can enter and emerge within one mind and can also enter and emerge distinctly. Distinct entering and emerging means that at times they enter the Middle more and the truths of emptiness and provisionality less; at times they enter the truths of emptiness and provisionality more and the Middle less. At times they enter emptiness and the Middle more and provisionality less; at times they enter provisionality more and emptiness and the Middle less. At times they enter provisionality and the Middle more and emptiness less; at times they enter emptiness more and provisionality and the Middle less. Although the proportions of the three truths increase and decrease, none of the three is ever absent.

Another question: Does this not make them sequentially distinct?

Answer: The Perfect Teaching can manifest even the superior distinct marks of sequence; how could it be unable to manifest the inferior? Perfect interfusion does not obstruct differentiated function.

Benefits of Entering the Provisional

Second is the explanation of the benefits of entering the provisional. The bodhisattva did not originally cultivate emptiness because he prized emptiness, but for the sake of beings. Precisely because he does not prize emptiness, he does not abide in it. Precisely because he seeks to benefit beings, he must emerge from emptiness. He can therefore arise in response from true principle, with the Dharma eye according with faculties.

For those who should be delivered through a buddha-body, the bodhisattva manifests a buddha-body, teaches them Dharma, and administers medicine. For those who should be delivered through the forms of a bodhisattva, the Two Vehicles, gods, nāgas, the eight classes, and so forth, he manifests the corresponding forms. Only accomplishing beings and purifying buddha-lands in this way are called benefit.

Although bodhisattvas of the Tripiṭaka Teaching also emerge into the provisional, they attain only contaminated superknowledges, not a response arising from true principle. They distinguish through worldly wisdom, not the illumination of the Dharma eye. Although they can benefit beings, they cannot yet truly accomplish them. Although they perform Buddha work, they do not yet purify buddha-lands. This is only limited transformation, yielding very slight benefit, and so forth.

When bodhisattvas of the Shared Teaching enter the provisional, they can distinguish medicine from illness, but rely only on the two truths of true and conventional. Their diagnosis does not reach deeply enough, nor does their knowledge of Dharma medicine reach far enough. Their superknowledges still arise through intentional effort rather than naturally emerging in response from true principle.

A true response has beginning and end. The bodhisattva first manifests as beings’ parents and teachers, forming Dharma affinities with them lifetime after lifetime and regulating them everywhere, often over immeasurable incalculable eons. When their wholesome roots mature, he manifests birth in a royal palace, becomes a buddha beneath the tree of awakening, delivers beings through gradual and sudden teachings, and finally manifests entry into nirvāṇa while relics remain in the world. Such long benefit, with beginning and end, is called response. Suddenly appearing from nowhere and vanishing after a moment is not true response. A fragmentary benefit for one brief time cannot be called accomplishment. Finally reducing the body to ash and entering quiescent cessation cannot be called purification of a buddha-land.

The meaning of the benefit attained by entering the provisional at the ten practices of the Distinct Teaching is the same as in the Shared Teaching. On entering the grounds, however, one can obtain the Tathāgata’s single body and immeasurable bodies, serenely quiescent yet responding to everything. At that point, knowing illness reaches the very source of illnesses. Recognizing medicine exhausts the treasury of Dharma medicine. Administering medicine according to illness fits as one seal to another, without the slightest error. True wisdom of the varieties of the path and the most excellent Dharma eye make every response naturally pervade beings.

The bodhisattva harmonizing his light and mingling with the dust is the beginning of forming affinities. Manifesting the eight marks of awakening is the conclusion of one period of transformation. This is called both transformation and response. None who see or hear him fail to gain benefit. Everything he does occurs within the purification of buddha-lands, and the benefit of entering the provisional is real and unfailing. Since this is so at the first ground, later grounds can be known by analogy. From the first abode of the Perfect Teaching, entering the provisional already gives true benefit, and so it continues through the final mind.

Distinguishing True Response from Deviant Transformation

Understanding this meaning makes it possible to distinguish true from false among transformations. Why? Māra too can use a contaminated mind to assume an uncontaminated appearance and manifest a buddha image. Laozi traveled westward, and some say he became a buddha to transform the Hu peoples. Non-Buddhists can transform Śakra into a ram and hold a river in an ear. Nothing lies beyond the five superknowledges gained through worldly wisdom. Such deviant transformations are immeasurable and boundless, yet do not even equal the transformations of the Tripiṭaka Teaching’s five superknowledges. How could they count as the naturally functioning true responses of the Distinct and Perfect teachings?

There are many accounts of transformation, and people without the Dharma eye easily believe them in error. Careful and subtle examination shows that they cannot be conflated. Know, therefore, that extending a response-body from the ground of the Dharma body to deliver beings throughout the ten Dharma realms is the stage of the true benefit of entering the provisional.

Pervasive Breaking through Dharmas in Entering the Provisional from Emptiness

Before true wisdom arises, beings produce hundreds, thousands, and tens of thousands of views according to what they themselves conceive and cling to. All are called delusions of views. It resembles a blind person asking the color of milk: the answers are not milk’s true color. It also resembles people touching an elephant and saying the elephant is like a rope or pestle: how could either touch the reality of the whole animal? It is also like delirious speech during illness. Since these views are themselves provisional, one passes through the simple, compound, and complete four views and breaks each through contemplation. If the breaking is not pervasive, one cannot enter emptiness. Only when the delusions of views and thought are exhausted is it called pervasive breaking through Dharmas.

According only to textual sequence, it appears that the layers must be broken one after another. The true intent is not limited to this. The delusions of views and thought are immediately ignorance; ignorance is immediately Dharma-nature. Breaking views and thought is itself breaking ignorance. Breaking ignorance is itself seeing Dharma-nature. Only entry into the emptiness of the true mark is called pervasive breaking through Dharmas.

Pervasive breaking through Dharmas in entering the provisional from emptiness is the same. Within provisional existence are immeasurable illness-Dharmas, medicine-Dharmas, and administration-of-medicine Dharmas. When distinguishing these three classes, as long as even one point remains unpenetrated, it cannot be called pervasive breaking through Dharmas. Before the Dharma eye arises, although distinctions can be made, what one sees is still only partial and cannot be called pervasive breaking.

At purification of the six faculties, distinguishing one illness reveals how many kinds it contains; understanding one sentence of Dharma penetrates immeasurable sentences. Even if the buddhas of the ten directions all teach at once, one can receive and retain everything in that single moment. This is one share of the breath attained at the approximate stage. When ignorance obstructing the superknowledges of the inconceivable path of transformation is also broken and one can illuminate the true and conventional truths simultaneously, only then is it truly called pervasive breaking through Dharmas.

In summary, sequential breaking layer by layer still cannot be called pervasive. Only nonsequential breaking that is immediately pervasive is called pervasive. The foregoing contemplations are layered and numerous and might cause people to lose their way. Pervasive breaking through Dharmas is therefore used as the conclusion only after the two contemplations of entering emptiness and entering the provisional.

義疏Exposition

入空以後,還有路嗎?若一切法皆空,眾生、煩惱、佛土與教化都不可得,菩薩為甚麼還要回到千差萬別的人間?若再分別眾生的病與法門的藥,是否又把已破的假有重新立實?

《摩訶止觀》不以一句『空而不空』匆匆回答。它先問為甚麼要入假,再問憑甚麼能入假;繼而把教化拆成知道病、辨識藥、依病授藥三件事;最後追問,這種能力從哪一位開始,何時才是真實利益,又怎樣才配稱破法遍。於是,從空入假不是離開觀心而另談教化,而是檢驗空慧能否在一切差別中自由運作。

一、空若不能利人,便不是菩薩的住處

二乘也能證真,為何不稱菩薩?分界不在有沒有入空,而在有沒有大悲。只論自己解脫,入空已能斷縛;若論救拔他人,停在空中便沒有作用。菩薩從假入空,是破自己的執著;從空入假,是破他人的執著。前一步使他不同凡夫,後一步使他不同二乘。

因此,入假不是重新受有染污。它的形狀是身處萬有而不染,以法眼識別藥性,以慈悲配合病情,兼濟眾生而不疲倦。空慧沒有被放棄,恰恰因為不受假有束縛,才有能力進入假有。

本論接連用了兩個幾乎不可能的意象。第一是在空中種樹:沒有土地,樹怎樣落根、開花、結果?第二是向空中不斷射箭:後箭的箭尾承住前箭,使它們不落地。兩個譬喻都把難處說到極致:樹沒有地可依,仍要成就枝葉華果;箭不落地,仍須一箭接住一箭。菩薩不住在空中,仍維持利他的作用。若住空不出,眾生永遠得不到利益;所以志在利他,不是入假之後附加的善意,而是入假的根本用意。

二、是智慧把人帶出空嗎

若智慧銳利便能入假,舍利弗為何仍住空?本論列出五種因緣,正為拆開這個誤會。

第一是慈悲。菩薩最初看見眾生被顛倒囚禁,已把他們愛同一子;自己斷惑入空以後,同體哀傷反而加深。第二是本誓。自己若獨免苦患,便辜負從前拔苦與樂的弘願;所以要進入眾生生活,與他們同事而引導。第三是利智。它真正銳利之處,是一入空便看見住空的過失:不能淨佛國土,不能教化眾生,也不能具足佛法。第四是善巧。進入生死煩惱而不損智慧,遮障困難反而成為教化的助緣。第五是精進。佛道雖遠、眾生雖多,心仍堅固,不因路長而疲退。

這五項不是五種漂亮德目,而像進入險陣所須的五件實物:有親可援,有約可守,有策可行,有力可用,有膽可進。四種戰士又把身力與膽勇拆開:身弱可以膽勇,身強可以膽勇,有力也可能怯弱,也有人力膽俱無。反過來,根性稍鈍的人,只要其餘四種因緣深厚,仍能走入假有。於是有根利住空、根鈍住空、根利入假、根鈍入假四句,不能用利鈍一條線判定誰是菩薩。

《淨名經》的病室又讓五緣有了具體聲音。由自己的病憐憫他人的病,是同體大悲;記得宿世所受無量苦,是不忘本誓;念念饒益眾生,是知道住空有過;憶所修福而守清淨命,是方便;不生憂惱而常起精進,是勇健。安慰病者並非只勸他看身無常而入空,也不是立即說最高的中道;在兩者之間,還要教他因病走向眾生。

三、為何知道一種病,要列出無量句

入假觀先做三件事:知道病、辨識藥、依病授藥。病有見惑與思惑,藥有世間、出世間與出世間上上,授藥又須隨根性分別;三件事由此合成大醫之學。

知道病,先知見惑與思惑。見惑以我見為根,而我見又以一念惑心為根。一念心因妄想而起,我因顛倒而生;從這裡開出無量邪見,邪見再造結業,使眾生墮落沉迴,像手中火把轉成一輪火。要使火輪止息,不是追著輪上的每一道火光撲打,而是停下轉火的手。妄想與顛倒止息,根本便息,枝條自然離去。

既然根本只是一念惑心,為何還須分別居處、時節、國土、食物、貧富、形貌與性情?因為同一顛倒落在不同依報、正報與業緣中,會形成不同的見。有人棄榮辭位,有人以樵漁為樂;有人扣牛角求相,有人負鼎器求卿;有人喜文,有人尚武;有人貪味,有人嗜酒;有人多瞋,有人多喜。見外相,可以識內業;見末端,可以推根本。若只說一切都是妄想,卻看不見妄想如何因地、因時、因人而異,便還不能按病給藥。

久近也是病歷。有些見累積多世,有些近世才起,有些此生剛生,有些將在未來盛大。同一句見落在不同積習中,深淺輕重不同;同一劑藥,也不能不問病程便照量投下。

最令人望而生畏的是重數。從一有見開三假,三假各開四句,四句再開四悉檀,又各有性空、相空、止、觀;再乘信行、法行與彼此轉變,乘四見、單複具足,乘能破所破、自行化他,便有七萬二千三百八十四句。若再連六十二見、八十八使展開,數目無量。

這些算式的意思不是要人把煩惱變成一份龐大名冊,彷彿多背一個數便多破一分惑。它要指出,一個『見』從來不是孤立的一句意見;它有生起方式,有表達句型,有說法機宜,有能治與所治,有自己修與教他修。菩薩知道多少條件共同構成這一見,也知道多少條件共同構成另一見,才能對深淺輕重不生錯謬。這叫知集;由集如何流轉而知苦。

思惑同樣要知根本、因緣、久近、重數,只是以癡為根。九地八十一品,一品又開信解、見得、四悉檀、信法互轉、三假、四句、性相二空;逐層推展,自行與化他合計成二十七萬七千一百三十六句。再細分每一禪、每一品,數目不可說盡。見惑像四十里水,思惑雖不橫起,只緣一諦,仍可如十里之水,絕不是一滴之名便表示其量微少。

二乘徑直以一門入空,所以不預先分別;菩薩入空以前已總知病相,出假時再以止息緣念為止,以緣思假為觀,助開法眼。這好比學律不必把五部律書塞在胸中,卻必須在因緣現前時能正己正人。句數若不能即行即用,只是負擔;能在病緣中運用,繁多便不妨礙清明。

四、世間善法為何也能叫藥

病無量,藥也無量。本論把藥分成世間、出世間、出世間上上三類。這個次第先承認一件常被忽略的事:眾生若還沒有出世根機,直接給深法未必能受;使他先免惡趣、安定人倫的世善,也是真正的權宜救護。

仁、義、禮、智、信可與不殺、不盜、不邪婬、不飲酒、不妄語相應;木、金、水、土、火也可與五戒互相會通;禮、樂、詩、書、易各從節制、和心、風刺、義讓、測度陰陽而防護相應過失。周公、孔子所立五常,因此可以成為治世的法藥。菩薩不是略知其名便算入世,而要在世智上通達到眾人信伏,才可能作師引導。

可是世間藥不治究竟病。有漏禪像水裝進漏器,雖盛終失;世善像彩衣受雨,色澤終會斑駁脫落。病暫時治好,後來仍會再發。承認世藥有用,不等於把它抬成出世解脫;看見它不究竟,也不等於在眾生尚不能受深法時拒絕救護。

出世法藥可以是一道、二道、三法,乃至八萬四千法門。一行三昧是一道;定與慧是二輪;戒定慧是三學;又有四念處、五力、六念、七覺支、八正道、九想、十智。每一法又有種種名、種種相、種種治。海上導師若只知一條航路,遇風候與水勢變化便不能領眾;菩薩為眾生集法藥,也須遍識這些開合。

出世間上上法藥也可由一至十展開。一法是一實諦;二法是止與觀;三法是止、觀、隨道戒,也是空、無相、無作三三昧;四法以四念處觀色非淨穢、受非苦樂、想行非我無我、心非常無常;五法把止觀開成五根五力;六法在止觀中念佛、法、僧、戒、天、捨;七法使止攝除、捨、定,觀攝擇、喜、精進,念通兩邊;八法把四句破假開成八正道;九法從污穢五陰開九想;十法以十智知苦集道滅與眾生差別。

為何同一止觀能開成這許多藥?因為藥方不是由數字決定,而由病決定。神農嘗草,一味、二味、十味或眾味都可成方;藥材又有皮、肉、汁、果、根、莖、枝、葉,有山海水陸、四方土地,有乾濕採掘的時節。菩薩同樣要知道,哪一法是眾生所樂,哪一法不合樂欲;哪一法方便適宜,哪一法不適宜;哪一法正能對治,哪一法不能;哪一法能引入第一義,哪一法不能。

治自己一病,一藥也許足夠;要成大醫,便須遍知諸藥。止觀於一寂定開無量止,於一大慧開無量觀,仍如河水量作升合,不增不減。病因、苦痛、方治、痊癒因緣各各不同,便有湯飲、吐下、針灸、丸散種種方法。知見思煩惱之集,知善惡所感之苦,知一切法門之道,知眾生證入之滅,所有藥病仍不離種種四諦。

五、為何不可以永遠照舊方治病

神農留下原方,華他、扁鵲為何還要觀時、觀藥,另立新方?因為南北鄉土不同,人體強弱不同,飲食鹹淡、藥性濃淡、病勢輕重也不同。固守原方,可能不能治後人的病;因時制方,反而使病痊癒。

佛出世時,根機成熟,隨根說法,眾生無不得悟。後代情惑轉變,若只把經文直接交給眾生,可能不能利益。菩薩因此通經作論,依經法廣立名字、解說義理。判準不是新舊,而是眾生有沒有因之悟入。守舊若堵住教化,便違背入假本意;另立名義若離經失理,也不再是法施。空慧使菩薩不執舊方,慈悲使他不以創新自娛,法眼則在時、地、人、藥之間判斷真正適宜。

授藥也從眾生實際能受之處開始。沒有出世根機,就先以君臣、父子、禮樂、德慧安定世間;禮扶戒,樂扶定,至德要道扶慧。上古未宜出世、邊地未感佛興,先開禮義,大小乘經才可能被信受。世藥不是終點,卻可能是走向深法以前不可缺的承接。

已有出世根機,又依下、中、上、上上四根給藥。下根志樂狹、行力弱、五濁重、智慧鈍,便以生滅法、事六度、勤對治、斷婬欲瞋怒愚癡來治;又隨有、無、亦有亦無、非有非無的樂欲,開四論四門。中根稍強,授因緣即空之藥。上根心廣、障輕、慧大,授無量四諦、次第入中之藥。上上根無與等者,直說善如空生、障如空滅,入究竟道。四根各有四門,便有十六道滅,對治十六苦集。

同一片雲降下雨水,各種草木卻各依自身而生長。菩薩也隨眾生的類別發出妙聲,使法音進入其心,令他們服行相應法藥,各自得到利益。若因空中無法而不說十六門,就沒有入假;若在說十六門時離開空慧,又失去入空所得。

六、一定要修到很高,才能回來度人嗎

行人常想:見惑尚未盡,思惑更遙遠,哪有能力出假?這念頭像聽見遠方有七寶山,才整束雙足,隨即因路險而退。又像已沉入空的敗種,後來聽見菩薩功德,只能悲泣懊悔。若把入假一律推到遙遠果位,今天便永遠沒有第一步。

本論依四教各判三根。三藏教下根到第三阿僧祇劫才正式入假;中根在第二阿僧祇劫已能化物;上根初發心便為度一切,雖知空而不捨眾生。通教下根要斷惑盡,中根斷見惑後便能入假,上根初心聞慧已體見思即空,當下便可作眾生依止。別教下根十住後到十行修假,中根十住初心得無漏不退便能出用,上根初發心已知功德如幻而修方便。圓教六根清淨固然遍見十界,五品弟子能行六度、廣說法,也已入假;初心既圓觀三諦,能即中,也能即假。

為何經中又有八地、六地、七地方修出假的說法?那是隨一類根機而說的一條路,不足以概括所有根性。專修空到六地,好像三百由旬的大鳥身軀肥大,卻沒有兩翼,從天墜落。空、無相、無作之身越肥,假觀之翅若不生,越可能墮入二乘地。能治這種敗種的妙法,不是否定曾修的空,而是使滅智之心重新生起大乘善根。

四教都有三根,若一定要標出一個固定入假位,本論取下根為準。一是依一教次第,二是到此決定不退;中上根雖可能早入,也可能進退,所以不以他們定教位。這個判法同時保住兩件事:不能因上根能早入,便把所有人都說成初心具足;也不能因下根須後入,便否認初心利他的可能。

入空本身也有情入、似入、真入。情入不是散亂情想,而是緣諦之觀在似證、真證以前,先與空法相應;即使會退,仍能憶念數修,後來得到大利益。通教能出入而不能即中,別教次第出入而不能一心,圓教則一心出入,也能隨機多入一諦、少入二諦。分量雖有增減,三諦不缺;能圓,並不妨礙示現差別。

七、甚麼才是真正的利益

菩薩修空,本來就是為眾生;不以空為珍貴,所以不住空;要利益眾生,所以從真起應,以法眼稱合根機。應以佛身得度便現佛身,應以菩薩、二乘、天龍八部得度便現相應身。成就眾生、清淨佛土,才是利益的完整形狀。

三藏菩薩雖出假,仍是有漏神通與世智分別,只能少分利益。通教菩薩雖知藥病,診病與識藥還不深遠,神通仍由作意而起。真正的應化有始有終:先作父母師長,世世結緣,處處調伏,直到根熟而生王宮、坐道樹、轉法輪、入涅槃、留舍利。倏忽出現又消失,只成一時片益,還不能叫作成就。

別教登地以後,一身能現無量身,知病能盡淵源,識藥能窮府藏,授藥如印不差。和光同塵是結緣之始,八相成道是一期之終;所見聞者無不蒙益,所有施為皆成清淨佛土。圓教初住及其後心,真實利益亦然。

所以變化本身不是證明。魔能變佛像,外道能示奇術,世間五通也能造作無量形相。若只因看見奇異便信是真應,便把邪化與法身垂應混為一談。判準不在形貌多麼驚人,而在是否從法身地任運垂應十界,是否真能成就眾生、淨佛國土。

八、為何最後還要再說一個遍

未發真智以前,所執百千萬種都叫作見。盲人問乳色,把別物之色當成乳色;盲人摸象,說象像繩、像杵;病人囈語,把妄見當真。單四見、複四見、具足四見若有一處未破,便不能入空。從文字次第看,見思盡才叫破法遍。

可是本論立即轉深一層:見思就是無明,無明就是法性;破見思就是破無明,破無明就是見法性。入實相空,才是真正的遍。從空入假也一樣:病法、藥法、授藥法無量,其中只要有一處不能通達,就還不是遍;法眼未發以前,雖有分別,所見仍只是一分。

六根清淨時,分別一病便知若干種,解一句法便達無量句,十方諸佛同時說法也能一時受持,這只是相似氣分。等障通無知也破,雙照真俗二諦,才稱破法遍。

於是,最後的答案不是把七萬句再乘到更大的數目。次第一層層破,仍不能叫遍;不次第破,才叫遍。前面觀法重疊既多,恐怕使人迷失,所以本論在入空觀、入假觀之後,以破法遍作總結。

輔行之眼

湛然先以『大悲利物』總攝入假意,並把空中種樹明判為出假之相。箭喻也不只表示技術高妙:般若之箭先向空射,方便之箭在後承接,使它不墮在涅槃地。這一解釋把不落生死、不住涅槃兩面同時照出。至於『同體哀傷』,湛然限為見眾生苦如自己苦,不把它讀成無緣大悲所說的同一實體。

五緣與五譬也由鏡中逐一扣合:親是天性,對應同體慈悲;約是要約,對應本誓;策是奇謀,對應善巧;力是勇健,對應利智;膽是勇悍,對應精進。這使前文的利鈍四句不再抽象:智慧只佔一項,能否出假還須看另外四緣是否具足。《淨名經》的三分慰喻屬智者對問疾品所作的判釋,入假正位在入空與入中之間;經文未自列三標。

知道病、辨識藥、依病授藥三法,湛然明說缺一不可,並以大醫、善知識之義為其古典背景。見惑算式中,直接合算與連根本計入兩種算法並存,數列因此看似跳接。五部律譬的重點,也不是胸中背滿部名,而是預作開法眼之因,對緣時能正己正人。

三種法藥在湛然判釋中,同屬菩薩從空出假所須遍識;本論結尾自己的名稱卻是『障通無知』,兩者不可互相替換。出世間藥與上上藥雖有相同數目、相同名目,上上藥的釋義須歸圓、別。藥材譬中,皮、肉、汁、果依次配四悉檀,根、莖、枝、葉依次配信、戒、定、慧,四方土地則譬四教各有四門;這些都是鏡中展義,不是論主在正文已逐項明說。

神農、華他、扁鵲一段,湛然以神農譬佛,以後世良醫譬出假菩薩,依經造論就是重新制方。至於『我遣三聖』,鏡中另題一部古經,並列顏回、孔子、老子的菩薩對應;但湛然緊接著記錄諸目錄多疑其偽。本論原說未題該經名;《輔行》所記則兼具補源與疑語。

四根的下、中、上、上上,是以四教彼此相望而立;十六門則是門門各具四諦,所以有十六道滅對治十六苦集。一雲所雨,鏡中判雲為現身、雨為說法;天雨無私,草木所受各異。這一限義說明差別在受法根性,不在法雨偏私。

位次方面,通教經文所見八地等說,只是一往隨機之說,不能遍括通方之意。大鳥譬又是智者隨義轉用,其細節並非通教經文逐字所列。湛然把圓教六根清淨判作下根入假,並說其功用已超過別教十向;位後五重問答的核心,則是一心能兼作差別,因為殊勝之能可以兼有較低之能。

利益段的鏡判更為嚴格:真實出假利益必至別教初地、圓教初住;藏、通二教菩薩並非真起應。本論先敘藏、通二教的少分利益,《輔行》則另以位判限定真實出假利益。分辨邪正變化,也正因魔境能作相似形貌,才須從起應之地與成就之實來決擇。

結遍處,湛然先分文字與元意:文字上破見思遍只是入空,意中則須見見思即無明、無明即法性。從空入假也有文相次第與文意不次第兩面;所破的『障通無知』,鏡中明指為障礙不思議化道神通的無明。結遍本可留到中道觀後,卻在此預先收束,是因前面一切重疊開展終究不出一心。這一眼使『遍』不成為類目總數,而回到一心能否即空、即假、通達無礙。

旋火輪一喻,湛然又把結業判為集、墮墜判為苦,指出苦集彼此迴轉;漏器綵衣一喻,則以禪法為水、心性為器、心行為漏,又以世禪為彩衣、心行為雨、退失為色脫。兩處都把譬喻的每一部件繫回所說法義,卻不把譬喻擴成論主未說的另一套次第。

After entering emptiness, is there still a road? If all Dharmas are empty and beings, afflictions, buddha-lands, and transformation cannot be obtained, why should the bodhisattva return to the human world of ten thousand distinctions? If he again distinguishes the illnesses of beings and the medicines of Dharma gates, does he not reestablish as real the provisional existence already broken?

The Mohe Zhiguan does not rush past the problem with a single formula such as “empty yet not empty.” It first asks why one must enter the provisional, then what enables one to enter. It next unfolds transformation into three tasks—knowing illness, recognizing medicine, and administering medicine according to illness—and finally asks at what stage this capacity begins, when its benefit becomes true, and what makes it worthy of the name pervasive breaking through Dharmas. Entering the provisional from emptiness is therefore not a departure from contemplating mind in order to discuss transformation elsewhere. It tests whether the wisdom of emptiness can function freely within every distinction.

1. If Emptiness Cannot Benefit Others, It Is Not the Bodhisattva’s Dwelling Place

People of the Two Vehicles can also realize the true. Why are they not called bodhisattvas? The boundary lies not in whether one has entered emptiness, but whether one has great compassion. In terms of one’s own liberation, entry into emptiness can sever bondage. In terms of rescuing others, remaining in emptiness has no function. The bodhisattva enters emptiness from the provisional to break his own attachment; he enters the provisional from emptiness to break the attachments of others. The first step distinguishes him from ordinary beings; the second distinguishes him from the Two Vehicles.

Entering the provisional is therefore not renewed contamination by existence. Its form is to dwell amid the myriad existents without being stained, recognize the properties of medicines with the Dharma eye, match compassion to illness, and help beings without weariness. The wisdom of emptiness has not been abandoned. Precisely because provisional existence cannot bind it, it can enter provisional existence.

The treatise then uses two nearly impossible images. The first is planting a tree in empty space: without earth, how could the tree take root, flower, and bear fruit? The second is continuously shooting arrows into the air: the nock of each later arrow supports the preceding one so that none falls to earth. Both similes drive the difficulty to its extreme. With no ground to rely on, the tree must still produce branches, leaves, flowers, and fruit. Without falling to earth, each arrow must still be supported by the next. The bodhisattva does not abide in emptiness, yet retains the function of benefiting others. If he abides in emptiness and never emerges, beings can never gain benefit. The resolve to benefit others is therefore not a benevolent addition made after entering the provisional; it is the fundamental intent of entry itself.

2. Is Wisdom What Carries a Person Out of Emptiness?

If sharp wisdom by itself enabled entry into the provisional, why did Śāriputra still abide in emptiness? The treatise lists five conditions precisely to dismantle this misunderstanding.

The first is compassion. When the bodhisattva first sees beings imprisoned by inversion, he already cherishes them as his only child. After severing delusion and entering emptiness himself, his grief of the same body becomes still deeper. The second is the original vow. Were he alone to escape suffering, he would betray his former vast vow to remove suffering and give happiness. He must therefore enter beings’ lives, share their affairs, and guide them. The third is sharp wisdom. Its true sharpness consists in seeing the fault of abiding in emptiness the moment one enters it: one cannot purify buddha-lands, transform beings, or complete Buddha Dharma. The fourth is skillful means. One enters birth-and-death and affliction without damaging wisdom; obstructions and difficulties instead become supporting conditions for transformation. The fifth is diligence. Though the Buddha path is distant and beings innumerable, the mind remains firm and does not weary or retreat because the road is long.

These five are not five attractive virtues displayed for admiration. They resemble five concrete resources needed to enter a dangerous battle: kin who can help, a compact one must keep, a strategy one can follow, strength one can employ, and courage with which to advance. Four kinds of warriors further separate bodily strength from courage. A weak body can possess courage, and a strong body can possess courage; a person with strength may still be timid, while another may lack both strength and courage. Conversely, someone with somewhat dull faculties can still enter provisional existence if the other four conditions are profound. There are therefore four alternatives: sharp faculties abiding in emptiness, dull faculties abiding in emptiness, sharp faculties entering the provisional, and dull faculties entering the provisional. A single scale from sharp to dull cannot decide who is a bodhisattva.

The sickroom of the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra gives the five conditions a concrete voice. Pitying another’s illness through one’s own is great compassion of the same body. Remembering immeasurable suffering undergone in former lives is not forgetting the original vow. Benefiting beings from thought to thought is recognizing the fault of abiding in emptiness. Recalling cultivated merit while maintaining pure livelihood is skillful means. Not giving rise to sorrow but constantly arousing diligence is vigor. Comforting the sick is not only exhorting them to contemplate the body’s impermanence and enter emptiness, nor is it immediately proclaiming the highest Middle Way. Between the two, they must also be taught to move through illness toward beings.

3. Why Does Knowing One Illness Require Immeasurable Alternatives?

Contemplation in entering the provisional first undertakes three tasks: knowing illness, recognizing medicine, and administering medicine according to illness. Illness includes the delusions of views and thought. Medicine includes the worldly, supramundane, and supramundane supreme. Administration must also be distinguished according to faculties. These three together form the discipline of the great physician.

Knowing illness begins with the delusions of views and thought. Views take the view of self as their root, and the view of self in turn takes one thought of deluded mind as its root. A thought of mind arises through deluded conception, and a self arises through inversion. From here immeasurable deviant views unfold; deviant views produce fetters and karma, and beings fall and revolve as a torch in the hand becomes a wheel of fire. To stop the wheel, one does not chase and extinguish every streak of fire around its rim. One stops the hand that turns the torch. When deluded conception and inversion cease, the root ceases and the branches naturally depart.

If the root is only one thought of deluded mind, why still distinguish dwelling place, season, land, food, poverty and wealth, bodily form, and temperament? Because the same inversion, situated within different dependent recompenses, direct recompenses, and karmic conditions, forms different views. One person renounces honor and office, another delights in gathering wood and fishing; one strikes an ox horn seeking ministerial rank, another carries a cooking vessel seeking high office; one favors civil arts, another martial affairs; one craves flavors, another drink; one is irascible, another joyful. Outer marks reveal inner karma; the tip discloses the root. If one merely says that everything is deluded conception but cannot see how deluded conception differs by place, time, and person, one still cannot administer medicine according to illness.

Duration is likewise a case history. Some views have accumulated across many lives; some arose only recently; some have just appeared in this life; others will flourish in the future. The same view takes different depths and degrees of gravity within different habits. The same dose of medicine cannot be administered without first asking how the illness has developed.

The counts of grades are the most daunting. One view of existence unfolds as three provisionalities; each provisionality as four alternatives; the four alternatives as four siddhāntas; each again as nature-emptiness, mark-emptiness, calming, and contemplation. Multiply these by practice through faith and Dharma and their mutual transitions, by the four views and their simple, compound, and complete forms, by breaker and broken, and by one’s own practice and transforming others: the result is 72,384 alternatives. Further unfold the sixty-two views and eighty-eight agents, and their number becomes immeasurable.

The point of these calculations is not to turn affliction into an enormous catalog, as though memorizing another number removed another portion of delusion. A “view” is never one isolated opinion. It has a manner of arising, a form of expression, an occasion for teaching, a treatment and what is treated, one’s own cultivation and cultivation taught to others. Only by knowing how many conditions together constitute this view and how many constitute another can the bodhisattva avoid error regarding their depth and gravity. This is called knowing origination; through knowing how origination circulates, he knows suffering.

The delusion of thought likewise requires knowledge of its root, conditions, duration, and grades, except that it takes delusion as its root. The eighty-one grades of the nine grounds each unfold through understanding by faith, attainment by seeing, the four siddhāntas, mutual transition between faith and Dharma, the three provisionalities, four alternatives, and the two emptinesses of nature and mark. Layer by layer, one’s own practice and transforming others yield 277,136 alternatives. If every meditative concentration and grade is further subdivided, the count cannot be exhausted. Views resemble forty li of water. Though thought does not arise laterally and conditions only one truth, it can still resemble ten li of water; calling it one drop certainly does not mean that its quantity is small.

People of the Two Vehicles enter emptiness directly through one gate and therefore make no prior distinctions. Before entering emptiness, bodhisattvas have already known the marks of illness in outline. When emerging into the provisional, they again use the calming that stills conditioned thoughts and the contemplation that takes the provisionality of thought as its object, thereby assisting the opening of the Dharma eye. It resembles the study of Vinaya. One need not stuff the five divisions into one’s chest, but must be able to correct oneself and others when conditions arise. If the numbered alternatives cannot be put immediately into practice, they are only a burden. When they can be used amid the conditions of illness, their abundance does not obstruct clarity.

4. Why Can Worldly Wholesome Dharmas Also Be Called Medicine?

Illnesses are immeasurable, and medicines are likewise immeasurable. The treatise divides medicines into worldly, supramundane, and supramundane supreme. This sequence first acknowledges something easily overlooked: if beings do not yet possess supramundane faculties, directly giving them profound Dharma may exceed what they can receive. Worldly wholesomeness that first keeps them from evil destinations and stabilizes human relationships is a genuine provisional rescue.

Benevolence, righteousness, ritual, wisdom, and trustworthiness can correspond to not killing, not stealing, not committing sexual misconduct, not becoming intoxicated, and not speaking falsely. Wood, metal, water, earth, and fire can likewise be integrated with the Five Precepts. The Book of Rites, Book of Music, Book of Odes, Book of Documents, and Book of Changes protect against corresponding faults through restraint, harmonizing mind, moral satire, righteousness and yielding, and gauging yin and yang. The five constant virtues established by the Duke of Zhou and Confucius can thus become Dharma medicine for governing the world. The bodhisattva cannot enter the world merely by knowing their names. He must penetrate worldly wisdom until people trust and follow him; only then can he guide them as a teacher.

Worldly medicine does not, however, treat the ultimate illness. Contaminated meditative concentration resembles water poured into a leaking vessel: though filled, it will empty. Worldly wholesomeness resembles colored clothing caught in rain: its hues eventually mottle and peel away. An illness temporarily cured later returns. Acknowledging the usefulness of worldly medicine does not elevate it into supramundane liberation. Seeing that it is not ultimate does not justify refusing rescue when beings cannot yet receive profound Dharma.

Supramundane Dharma medicine can consist of one path, two paths, or three Dharmas, up to 84,000 Dharma gates. The samādhi of one practice is one path. Concentration and wisdom are two wheels. Ethical discipline, concentration, and wisdom are three trainings. There are also the four foundations of mindfulness, five powers, six recollections, seven factors of awakening, Eightfold Path, nine perceptions, and ten knowledges. Every Dharma again has various names, marks, and treatments. If a maritime guide knows only one route, he cannot lead others when winds and currents change. A bodhisattva gathering Dharma medicine for beings must likewise pervasively know these unfoldings and contractions.

Supramundane supreme Dharma medicine also unfolds from one through ten. One Dharma is the single truth of reality. Two are calming and contemplation. Three are calming, contemplation, and ethical discipline following the path, as well as the three samādhis of emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness. Four are the foundations of mindfulness contemplating form as neither pure nor impure, feeling as neither suffering nor pleasure, perception and formations as neither self nor no-self, and mind as neither permanent nor impermanent. Five unfold calming-and-contemplation as the five faculties and powers. Six recollect Buddha, Dharma, Saṅgha, ethical discipline, deities, and relinquishment within calming-and-contemplation. Seven gather tranquility, equanimity, and concentration under calming; investigation, joy, and diligence under contemplation; and mindfulness under both. Eight unfold the four alternatives that break provisionality as the Eightfold Path. Nine unfold the nine perceptions from the impure aggregates. Ten employ the ten knowledges to know suffering, origination, path, cessation, and the differences among beings.

How can one calming-and-contemplation unfold into so many medicines? Because a prescription is determined not by a number but by an illness. Shennong tasted plants: one, two, ten, or many ingredients could form a prescription. Medicinal substances have bark, flesh, sap, fruit, roots, stems, branches, and leaves; come from mountain, sea, water, land, and soils in the four directions; and must be harvested and dug, dry or moist, in season. The bodhisattva must likewise know which Dharma accords with a being’s aspirations and which does not; which is suitable as skillful means and which is not; which directly counteracts and which cannot; which leads into the ultimate and which does not.

One medicine may suffice to treat one illness in oneself. To become a great physician, one must pervasively know all medicines. From one concentration of quiescence, calming-and-contemplation unfolds immeasurable calming practices; from one great wisdom, immeasurable contemplations. Yet it still resembles measuring river water into sheng and ge, neither increasing nor decreasing the dose. Causes of illness, pain, prescription, treatment, and recovery all differ; therefore there are decoctions, emetics, purgatives, needles, cautery, pills, and powders. Knowing the origination of the afflictions of views and thought, the suffering caused by wholesome and unwholesome conduct, the path of every Dharma gate, and the cessations realized by beings, all medicine and illness remain within the various Four Truths.

5. Why Can an Old Prescription Not Be Followed Forever?

Shennong left original prescriptions. Why did Hua Tuo and Bian Que still examine the time and the medicines and establish new prescriptions? Because northern and southern regions differ; bodies differ in strength; foods and medicines differ in intensity; and illnesses differ in gravity. Rigidly preserving an original prescription may fail to treat later people. Formulating one according to the time can instead bring recovery.

When the Buddha appeared, beings’ faculties were mature. He taught according to their faculties, and none failed to awaken. In later ages, emotional attachments and delusions changed. Simply handing scriptural words directly to beings might not benefit them. Bodhisattvas therefore transmit scripture and compose treatises, establishing names and explaining meanings in accordance with scriptural Dharma. The criterion is not newness or antiquity but whether beings thereby awaken and enter. Preserving the old in a way that blocks transformation betrays the intent of entering the provisional. Establishing new terms apart from scripture and principle ceases to be Dharma giving. The wisdom of emptiness prevents the bodhisattva from clinging to an old prescription; compassion prevents him from amusing himself with novelty; the Dharma eye judges what is truly suitable amid differences of time, place, person, and medicine.

Administering medicine also begins from what beings can actually receive. If they lack supramundane faculties, the bodhisattva first stabilizes the world through the relations of ruler and minister, parent and child, ritual, music, virtue, and wisdom. Ritual assists ethical discipline; music assists concentration; the highest virtue and essential path assist wisdom. Remote antiquity was not suited to the supramundane, and distant lands had not called forth a buddha’s appearance. Ritual and righteousness were therefore opened first so that Great- and Small-Vehicle scriptures could later be trusted and received. Worldly medicine is not the destination, but it can be the indispensable bridge preceding profound Dharma.

Once supramundane faculties are present, medicine is administered according to lower, middling, higher, and supreme faculties. Those with lower faculties have narrow aspirations, weak practice, heavy five turbidities, and dull wisdom; they are treated through arising and cessation, the six perfections as concrete practices, strenuous counteraction, and severance of sexual desire, anger, and delusion. Four treatises and gates further accord with their aspirations toward existence, nonexistence, both, or neither. Middling faculties are somewhat stronger and receive the medicine that conditioned arising is immediately empty. Higher faculties have broad minds, lighter obstructions, and great wisdom; they receive the immeasurable Four Truths and sequential entry into the Middle. Supreme faculties have no equal; they are directly taught that wholesomeness arises like empty space, obstruction ceases like empty space, and the ultimate path is entered. Each of the four faculties has four gates, making sixteen truths of path and cessation that counteract sixteen truths of suffering and origination.

One cloud releases rain, yet every plant and tree grows according to its own nature. The bodhisattva likewise emits wondrous sounds according to beings’ kinds, causing Dharma sound to enter their minds so they take the corresponding medicine and each gains benefit. If one refuses to teach sixteen gates because there are no Dharmas in emptiness, there is no entry into the provisional. If one abandons the wisdom of emptiness while teaching the sixteen gates, one loses what was gained by entry into emptiness.

6. Must One Reach a Very High Stage before Returning to Deliver Others?

Practitioners often think: the delusions of views are not yet exhausted, and the delusions of thought are more distant still; how could I have the capacity to emerge into the provisional? This thought resembles hearing of a distant mountain of seven treasures and binding one’s feet for the journey, only to retreat immediately because the road is dangerous. It also resembles a ruined seed already sunk into emptiness that later hears of bodhisattva merit and can only weep in remorse. If entry into the provisional is always postponed to a distant fruit, there will never be a first step today.

The treatise distinguishes three faculties within each of the four teachings. A person of lower faculties in the Tripiṭaka Teaching formally enters the provisional only in the third incalculable eon; one of middling faculties can transform beings in the second; one of higher faculties seeks from the first arousal of mind to deliver everyone and, although knowing emptiness, does not abandon beings. A person of lower faculties in the Shared Teaching must exhaust delusion; one of middling faculties can enter the provisional after severing views; through wisdom born of hearing, one of higher faculties embodies the immediate emptiness of views and thought at the initial mind and can at once become a refuge for beings. A person of lower faculties in the Distinct Teaching cultivates the provisional in the ten practices after the ten abodes; one of middling faculties obtains the uncontaminated and irreversible at the initial mind of the ten abodes and can immediately emerge and function; one of higher faculties already knows at the first arousal of mind that merit is illusory while still cultivating skillful means. In the Perfect Teaching, purification of the six faculties certainly sees all ten realms, yet disciples of the five grades who practice the six perfections and teach Dharma extensively have already entered the provisional. Since the initial mind perfectly contemplates the three truths, it can be immediately the Middle and immediately provisional.

Why, then, do scriptures also say that one cultivates emergence into the provisional only at the eighth, sixth, or seventh ground? Those are single paths explained according to particular faculties and do not encompass every kind. Cultivating only emptiness through the sixth ground resembles a great bird three hundred yojanas long whose body is enormous but whose two wings are absent, falling from heaven. The more the body of emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness is fattened while the wings of contemplating the provisional fail to grow, the more one risks falling into the ground of the Two Vehicles. The wondrous Dharma that can treat such a ruined seed does not deny the emptiness previously cultivated. It causes the mind whose wisdom was extinguished to produce Great-Vehicle wholesome roots anew.

All four teachings have three faculties. If one fixed stage of entering the provisional must be designated, the treatise uses lower faculties as the standard. First, this follows the sequence of a teaching. Second, on reaching this point one is definitely irreversible. People of middling or higher faculties may enter earlier but can still advance or retreat, so their stages do not define the teaching’s representative stage. This judgment preserves two things at once. One may not say that everyone is complete at the initial mind merely because higher faculties can enter early. Nor may one deny the possibility of benefiting others from the initial mind merely because lower faculties enter later.

Entry into emptiness itself also has conceptual, approximate, and true entry. Conceptual entry is not scattered emotion or imagination. Before approximate and true realization, contemplation taking truth as its object first corresponds to the Dharma of emptiness. Even if one retreats, repeated recollection and cultivation later yield great benefit. The Shared Teaching can enter and emerge but cannot immediately be the Middle. The Distinct Teaching enters and emerges sequentially but cannot do so in one mind. The Perfect Teaching enters and emerges in one mind and, according to faculties, can enter one truth more and the other two less. Although their proportions increase and decrease, none of the three truths is absent. The ability to be perfect does not obstruct the manifestation of distinctions.

7. What Is True Benefit?

The bodhisattva originally cultivates emptiness for beings. Because he does not prize emptiness, he does not abide in it. Because he seeks to benefit beings, he arises in response from the true, with the Dharma eye according with faculties. For those to be delivered through a buddha-body, he manifests a buddha-body. For those to be delivered through bodhisattvas, the Two Vehicles, gods, nāgas, and the eight classes, he manifests the corresponding bodies. Accomplishing beings and purifying buddha-lands together form the complete shape of benefit.

Although Tripiṭaka-Teaching bodhisattvas emerge into the provisional, they still rely on contaminated superknowledges and worldly discrimination and can provide only limited benefit. Although Shared-Teaching bodhisattvas know medicine and illness, their diagnosis and recognition of medicine are not yet deep or far-reaching, and their superknowledges still arise through intentional effort. True response-transformation has beginning and end. One first becomes parent or teacher, forms affinities life after life, and regulates beings everywhere; when their faculties mature, one is born in a royal palace, sits beneath the tree of awakening, turns the Dharma wheel, enters nirvāṇa, and leaves relics. A sudden appearance followed by disappearance provides only a fragmentary moment of benefit and cannot yet be called accomplishment.

After entry into the grounds in the Distinct Teaching, one body can manifest immeasurable bodies; knowing illness exhausts its sources, recognizing medicine exhausts its treasury, and administering medicine fits as one seal to another without error. Harmonizing one’s light and mingling with the dust begins the formation of affinities; the eight marks of awakening conclude a period of transformation. All who see or hear gain benefit, and everything done purifies buddha-lands. True benefit is likewise present from the first abode onward in the Perfect Teaching.

Transformation by itself is therefore not proof. Māra can transform into a buddha image, non-Buddhists can display strange arts, and the five worldly superknowledges can produce immeasurable forms. If the mere sight of something extraordinary were enough to establish true response, deviant transformation would be confused with response descending from the Dharma body. The criterion is not how astonishing an appearance may be, but whether it arises naturally in response from the ground of the Dharma body throughout the ten realms and truly accomplishes beings and purifies buddha-lands.

8. Why Must the Text Conclude by Speaking of Pervasiveness Again?

Before true wisdom arises, the hundreds, thousands, and tens of thousands of objects of clinging are all called views. Blind people asked the color of milk and mistook the colors of other objects for milk’s color. Blind people touched an elephant and said it resembled a rope or pestle. A sick person spoke deliriously and took deluded perception as true. If even one point among the simple, compound, and complete four views remains unbroken, one cannot enter emptiness. According to textual sequence, pervasive breaking through Dharmas occurs only when views and thought are exhausted.

The treatise immediately moves one level deeper. Views and thought are ignorance; ignorance is Dharma-nature. Breaking views and thought is breaking ignorance; breaking ignorance is seeing Dharma-nature. Only entry into the emptiness of the true mark is true pervasiveness. The same applies to entering the provisional from emptiness. Illness-Dharmas, medicine-Dharmas, and administration-of-medicine Dharmas are immeasurable. As long as even one point among them remains unpenetrated, breaking is not yet pervasive. Before the Dharma eye arises, one may distinguish, but one’s vision remains only partial.

At purification of the six faculties, distinguishing one illness reveals many kinds, understanding one sentence of Dharma penetrates immeasurable sentences, and the simultaneous teaching of the buddhas of the ten directions can all be received and retained at once. Yet this is only the breath of approximation. When ignorance obstructing superknowledge is broken and true and conventional are illuminated together, it is called pervasive breaking through Dharmas.

The final answer, then, is not to multiply the seventy-two thousand alternatives into a still larger number. Sequential breaking layer by layer cannot yet be called pervasive; only nonsequential breaking is pervasive. Because the preceding contemplations unfold in so many overlapping layers that practitioners might lose their way, the treatise uses pervasive breaking through Dharmas as its conclusion after contemplation in entering emptiness and contemplation in entering the provisional.

Through the Eye of the Fuxing

Zhanran first gathers the intent of entering the provisional under “great compassion benefiting beings” and clearly judges planting a tree in empty space to be the mark of emerging into the provisional. The arrow simile does more than display remarkable technique. The arrow of prajñā is shot into emptiness first; the arrow of skillful means follows and supports it, preventing its fall onto the ground of nirvāṇa. This explanation illuminates at once not falling into birth-and-death and not abiding in nirvāṇa. As for “grief of the same body,” Zhanran limits it to seeing beings’ suffering as one’s own and does not read it as the identity of substance associated with unconditioned great compassion.

The five conditions and five similes are paired one by one in the mirror. Kinship is an inborn bond corresponding to compassion of the same body. Compact is a binding covenant corresponding to the original vow. Strategy is an extraordinary plan corresponding to skillful means. Strength is vigor corresponding to sharp wisdom. Courage is intrepidity corresponding to diligence. This makes the preceding four alternatives of sharp and dull faculties concrete: wisdom occupies only one place, and emergence into the provisional still depends on whether the other four conditions are complete. The threefold consolation in the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra is Zhiyi’s judgment of the chapter on inquiring about illness. Entry into the provisional occupies the place between entry into emptiness and entry into the Middle; the scripture itself does not list these three headings.

Zhanran explicitly says that not one of the three Dharmas—knowing illness, recognizing medicine, and administering medicine according to illness—may be lacking, and gives the great physician and good spiritual friend as their classical background. Within the calculations of the delusions of views, direct totals and totals that include the roots coexist, which makes the number sequence appear to jump. The point of the five divisions of the Vinaya is likewise not to memorize a chestful of titles, but to prepare a cause for opening the Dharma eye so one can correct oneself and others when conditions arise.

In Zhanran’s judgment, the three kinds of Dharma medicine all belong to what a bodhisattva emerging from emptiness into the provisional must pervasively know. The treatise’s own term at the conclusion, however, is “ignorance obstructing superknowledge”; the two cannot be substituted for one another. Supramundane and supreme medicines may share counts and names, but the meanings of supreme medicines must return to the Perfect and Distinct. In the simile of medicinal substances, bark, flesh, sap, and fruit respectively correspond to the four siddhāntas; roots, stems, branches, and leaves correspond to faith, ethical discipline, concentration, and wisdom; and the soils of the four directions represent the four gates within each of the four teachings. These are meanings unfolded in the mirror, not items explicitly stated one by one by the author in the main text.

In the passage on Shennong, Hua Tuo, and Bian Que, Zhanran compares Shennong to the Buddha and later skilled physicians to bodhisattvas emerging into the provisional. Composing treatises in reliance on scriptures is the making of new prescriptions. Regarding “I dispatched three sages,” the mirror separately names an old scripture and associates Yan Hui, Confucius, and Laozi with particular bodhisattvas, but Zhanran immediately records that many catalogs suspect the work to be spurious. The main treatise names no scripture there. What the Fuxing records therefore combines a supplementary source attribution with language of doubt.

The four faculties—lower, middling, higher, and supreme—are named by viewing the four teachings in relation to one another. The sixteen gates arise because every gate possesses the Four Truths, yielding sixteen truths of path and cessation to counteract sixteen truths of suffering and origination. For the rain from one cloud, the mirror judges the cloud to be manifested bodies and the rain to be the teaching of Dharma. Heavenly rain is impartial, yet what plants and trees receive differs. This qualification locates difference in the faculties receiving Dharma, not in partiality of the Dharma rain.

Regarding stages, scriptural references to the eighth and other grounds in the Shared Teaching are only initial explanations according to faculties; they cannot comprehensively cover the universally applicable intent. The great-bird simile is likewise Zhiyi’s adaptive reuse according to meaning, and its details are not listed verbatim in a Shared-Teaching scripture. Zhanran judges purification of the six faculties in the Perfect Teaching to be entry into the provisional for lower faculties and says its function already exceeds the ten dedications of the Distinct Teaching. The core of the five exchanges that follow the stage discussion is that one mind can also make distinctions, because superior capacity can encompass inferior capacity.

The mirror’s judgment of the benefits passage is stricter still. True benefit from emerging into the provisional necessarily begins at the first ground of the Distinct Teaching or first abode of the Perfect Teaching. Bodhisattvas of the Tripiṭaka and Shared teachings do not truly arise in response. The treatise first describes their limited benefits; the Fuxing separately uses stages to restrict what counts as true benefit from emerging into the provisional. Distinguishing deviant from correct transformation is necessary precisely because demonic objects can assume similar appearances; the ground from which a response arises and the reality of its accomplishment must determine the judgment.

At the conclusion of pervasiveness, Zhanran first distinguishes wording from original intent. Textually, pervasively breaking views and thought is only entry into emptiness. In intent, one must see that views and thought are ignorance and ignorance is Dharma-nature. Entering the provisional from emptiness likewise has both sequential textual marks and nonsequential textual intent. The “ignorance obstructing superknowledge” that is broken is explicitly identified in the mirror as ignorance that obstructs the superknowledges of the inconceivable path of transformation. The conclusion could have been left until after contemplation of the Middle Way, yet it gathers the discussion here because all the preceding layered unfoldings ultimately do not go beyond one mind. Through this eye, “pervasive” does not become a total count of categories but returns to whether one mind can be immediately empty, immediately provisional, and unobstructedly penetrating.

For the simile of the whirling wheel of fire, Zhanran further judges fettering karma to be origination and falling into painful destinations to be suffering, showing suffering and origination revolving through one another. In the similes of the leaking vessel and colored garment, meditative Dharma is water, mind-nature the vessel, and mental conduct the leak; worldly meditative concentration is the colored garment, mental conduct the rain, and loss of attainment the fading of color. In both cases, every element of the simile is bound back to the Dharma meaning being taught without expanding the image into another sequence never stated by the author.

考據Apparatus

本單元是十境正觀中破法遍的第三個子位。智者由從假入空轉入從空出假,先明利他的用意與五種因緣,次以知病、識藥、授藥展開入假觀,再歷藏、通、別、圓判位與利益,終以不次第破收束『遍』義。全段兼有密集算式、醫藥譬喻、四教位次與經論撮引;本論直說、湛然判釋、今本平行與後世承受各有不同出處與層次。

一、科判定位

本單元起於「○第二、從空入假破法遍者,即為四」〔T1911 0075b27〕,止於「前觀法重沓既多,恐人迷故,約二觀後結破法遍也」〔T1911 0080b15〕;下一段「○第三、明中道止觀破法遍者」〔T1911 0080b16〕已入中道止觀。首尾都與相鄰段落共用行錨,故界線依段落而定,不以行號大小代替段界。

本論先列四科:入假意、入假因緣、入假觀、入假位;第四科又自列先歷教判位、明利益、結破法遍三項。依正文與《止觀輔行傳弘決》正釋,可作如下讀路:

本論範圍內容《止觀輔行傳弘決》對位
0075b29–0075c10入假意0339b18–0339c07
0075c11–0076a18入假五緣、淨名五意、利鈍料簡0339c08–0340b20
三之一0076a19–0077a18入假觀之知見思病0340b20–0341b21
三之二0077a19–0078b27識世間、出世間、出世間上上三藥0341b22–0343c11
三之三0078b28–0079a09應病授藥0343c12–0344a22
四之一0079a10–0079c23歷藏通別圓判入假位0344a23–0346a11
四之二0079c24–0080a27入假利益與邪正變化0346a12–0346c09
四之三0080a28–0080b15結破法遍0346c10–0347c02

本論明列「明入假觀者,即為三:一、知病,二、識藥,三、授藥」〔T1911 0076a19〕,三者是入假觀內部次第;「明入假位者:一、先歷教判位,二、明利益,三、結破法遍」〔T1911 0079a11〕,又表明利益與結遍仍收在第四大科。讀路雖細分為八節,不能倒說成智者原列八科。

二、成立與傳本

本單元承〈緣起〉所誌玉泉一夏智者說、灌頂記及現存本未完之事,自身跨卷六上、下而正說連續;傳本三本與第三再治本的沿革詳見緣起單元,此處只一句繫之,不據會本先後裁斷文義。

三、所引經論覆核

以下依本論次第全列二十六組明題、撮引與可識別場景。左欄守《摩訶止觀》原字,右欄只用所屬典籍卷首題名與短式藏號;同文、節引、合攝、異文及所指待考均並錄不判。

入假意、五緣與知病

《摩訶止觀》原句今本對讀覆核
「善巧方便如空中種樹」〔T1911 0075c08〕《大智度論》T1509:「譬如人欲於虛空中種樹,是為甚難」〔T1509 0651c12〕空中、虛空中異;本論撮成喻名
「又如仰射空中,筈筈相拄,不令墮地」〔T1911 0075c08〕《大智度論》T1509:「譬如仰射空中,箭箭相柱,不令落地」〔T1509 0197c17〕;又「譬如仰射虛空,箭箭相拄,不令墮地」〔T1509 0323a03〕本論兼取兩處今本的空中、相拄、墮地字樣
「諸法實性相,二乘亦皆得,而不名為佛」〔T1911 0075c03〕《大方廣佛華嚴經》T278:「諸法實性相,常住無變異,二乘亦得此,而不名為佛」〔T278 0566c19〕今本多常住無變異;亦皆得、亦得此異
「一、知病,二、識藥,三、授藥」〔T1911 0076a20〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「知病、知藥、應病授藥故」〔T374 0511b16〕識藥、知藥異;三法次序同
「若准見惑四十里水,此緣一諦,應是一十里水」〔T1911 0077a08〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「須陀洹人所斷煩惱,猶如縱廣四十里水,其餘在者如一毛渧」〔T374 0577b18〕一諦十里是智者依四諦所作算法;今本對舉四十里與一毛渧
「五部律不填人胸」〔T1911 0077a17〕《止觀輔行傳弘決》T1912 列曇無德四分、薩婆多十誦、彌沙塞五分、婆麁富羅未來、迦葉遺解脫五部〔T1912 0341b16〕五部是律藏群,不強繫一部典籍

《維摩詰所說經》問疾段在本論中開為三種慰喻與五意。今本逐項如下:

《摩訶止觀》原句《維摩詰所說經》T475 今本覆核
「先明觀身無常等」〔T1911 0075c28〕「說身無常,不說厭離於身」〔T475 0544c18〕本論以等字攝後續諸句
「當作醫王」〔T1911 0075c29〕「當作醫王,療治眾病」〔T475 0544c24〕節引
「以己之疾愍於彼疾」〔T1911 0076a01〕「以己之疾,愍於彼疾」〔T475 0544c22〕原字同,標點分合異
「當識宿世無數劫苦」〔T1911 0076a02〕「當識宿世無數劫苦」〔T475 0544c22〕同文
「當念饒益一切眾生」〔T1911 0076a03〕「當念饒益一切眾生」〔T475 0544c23〕同文
「憶所修福,念於淨命」〔T1911 0076a04〕「憶所修福,念於淨命」〔T475 0544c23〕同文
「勿生憂惱,常起精進」〔T1911 0076a05〕「勿生憂惱,常起精進」〔T475 0544c24〕同文

三種慰喻的空、假、中分判不是 T475 原有三標。《止觀輔行傳弘決》明記「此是大師判釋淨名問疾品中為三慰喻」〔T1912 0339c14〕,故經文與智者判釋須分層。

世間、出世間與上上法藥

《摩訶止觀》原句今本對讀覆核
「三歸、五戒、十善道、四禪、無量心等,名世間法施;二、出世間法施;三、出世間上上法施」〔T1911 0077a21〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223 有「教三歸依」〔T223 0394a18〕、「或教受五戒,或教一日戒,或教初禪」〔T223 0394a19〕、「或教慈悲喜捨」〔T223 0394a21〕,後明「法施有二種:一者世間,二者出世間」〔T223 0394b04〕今本材料散見而分類為二種;本論作三種。另《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》T670 有「世間、出世間、出世間上上法」〔T670 0483b18〕,但不是三種法施
「譬如王子從高墮下,父王愛念,積以繒綿於地接之,令免苦痛」〔T1911 0077a24〕《大智度論》T1509:「如國王子在高危處立,不可救護,欲自投地;王使人敷厚綿褥,墮則不死,差於墮地故」〔T1509 0227c19〕父王與王使人、繒綿與厚綿褥、免痛與不死等字異
「一切世間外道經書皆是佛說,非外道說」〔T1911 0077a29〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「所有種種異論、呪術、言語、文字,皆是佛說,非外道說」〔T374 0412c29〕本論以世間外道經書攝今本列舉
「一切世間所有善論皆因此經」〔T1911 0077b01〕《金光明經》T663:「世間出世間所作國事,所造世論皆因此經」〔T663 0344a09〕善論、所造世論異;今本另有國事語

本論以五常配五戒、五行配五戒,又以《禮》《樂》《詩》《尚書》《易》配五戒〔T1911 0077b02–13〕;這些都是功能配當,並非五部書的逐字引文,亦無藏號可繫。《止觀輔行傳弘決》另以《白虎通》《博物誌》會釋五行〔T1912 0342a04〕,只屬湛然補釋。

《摩訶止觀》原句今本對讀覆核
十二「凡夫雖修有漏禪,其心行穿如漏器;雖生非想當復退還,如雨彩衣其色駮脫」〔T1911 0077b19〕《修行道地經》T606:「設使始學得漏禪,其修行穿如漏器,雖生梵天當復還,如雨綵衣其色變」〔T606 0213b05〕漏器、退還、雨綵衣場景同;凡夫、始學,非想、梵天,駮脫、色變異。今本只作平行見證,所指仍待考
十三「或說信為道,或說樂欲,或說不放逸」〔T1911 0077b22〕至「或說修慈」〔T1911 0077b25〕《大般涅槃經》T374 自「如來或說信心為道」〔T374 0441b07〕起,續列不放逸、精進、身念處、正定、念佛三昧、無常想、阿蘭若、為人演法、持戒、親近善友、修慈本論省略各句證成,另有樂欲;今本該連段沒有樂欲
十四「他物莫取,一切法皆是他物;於一切法不受成羅漢」〔T1911 0077b27〕《思惟略要法》T617 有「他物莫取」〔T617 0298a09〕;《五門禪經要用法》T619 亦有「他物莫取」〔T619 0332c01〕兩本同有恒河邊問道場景,均無本論後兩句;無唯一經名,所指待考
十五「依隨經法,廣立名字而為作義,名為法施」〔T1911 0078b25〕《大智度論》T1509:「依隨經法,自演作義理、譬喻,莊嚴法施,為眾生說」〔T1509 0227b20〕廣立名字、自演義理譬喻與名為、莊嚴等字異

本論「我遣三聖化彼真丹」〔T1911 0078c06〕沒有題名。《止觀輔行傳弘決》補題《清淨法行經》,並說「月光菩薩彼稱顏回。光淨菩薩彼稱仲尼。迦葉菩薩彼稱老子」〔T1912 0343c18〕,旋即記「准諸目錄皆推此經以為疑偽」〔T1912 0343c20〕。《開元釋教錄》T2154 記「清淨法行經〔已上三經先在偽錄〕」〔T2154 0485a20〕,《貞元新定釋教目錄》T2157 記「清淨法行經一卷記說孔老顏回事」〔T2157 1015c23〕。今無單一經文可作所屬本,只誌傳本狀況,不代目錄裁斷。

本論以四題配有、無、有無、非有非無四門,傳本狀態須分開:

本論題名與用法今本狀態覆核
十七之一《阿毘曇》〔T1911 0078c16〕說有門阿毘曇是類稱,本段未指定單一論本所指待考,不強繫一論
十七之二「說《成實論》,生其小善」〔T1911 0078c18〕T1646 卷題「成實論卷第一」〔T1646 0239a03〕《成實論》T1646 題名相合;本論未逐字引論句
十七之三《昆勒論》〔T1911 0078c19〕說有無門今藏無單一所屬本所指待考
十七之四「說《離有無經》,生善破惡入真」〔T1911 0078c20〕《成實論》T1646 有「應為車匿說離有無經」〔T1646 0240a03〕古證只證題名與場景,不等於完整經本現存;所指待考

授藥、判位、利益與結遍

《摩訶止觀》原句今本對讀覆核
十八「如一雲所雨,而諸草木各得生長」〔T1911 0079a09〕《妙法蓮華經》T262:「一雲所雨,稱其種性而得生長華菓敷實」〔T262 0019b04〕;又「而諸草木,各有差別」〔T262 0019b06〕本論合攝兩句;各得生長不是今本連文
十九「譬如有人俱聞他方有七寶山,翹心束脚;若念路艱險,便退不前」〔T1911 0079a16〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「譬如二人俱聞他方有七寶山」〔T374 0534b12〕;又「唯路懸遠,嶮阻多難」〔T374 0534b14〕本論縮攝二人進退譬
十九「自惟敗種,泣動大千」〔T1911 0079a18〕《維摩詰所說經》T475:「我等何為永絕其根,於此大乘已如敗種」〔T475 0547a08〕;又「皆應號泣,聲震三千大千世界」〔T475 0547a10〕本論合攝敗種與號泣兩句
二十「八地修出假;或六地、七地斷結與羅漢齊,方修出假」〔T1911 0079b03〕《止觀輔行傳弘決》只說「於諸經中有此一往隨機之說。未可遍該通方之意」〔T1912 0344b28〕未得可承擔原句的單一根本經連文,所指待考;不以後代教判充當經文
二十一「有大鳥身長三百由旬而無兩翅,從天而墮,若死、若死等苦」〔T1911 0079b13〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223:「有鳥身長百由旬若二百三百由旬而無有翅,從三十三天自投閻浮提」〔T223 0336b23〕;又「若痛若惱若死、若死等苦」〔T223 0336c01〕本論取三個長度之一並撮合墮苦
二十一同上《大智度論》T1509:「金翅鳥在於天上」〔T1509 0566b19〕,下以無般若、無方便為無兩翅本論兼攝經與論釋;《止觀輔行傳弘決》明說「今文兩釋並是大師隨義轉用」〔T1912 0345a07〕
二十二「《華嚴》、《大品》不能治之,唯有《法華》能令無學還生善根」〔T1911 0079b20〕所題分別是《大方廣佛華嚴經》T278、《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223、《妙法蓮華經》T262這是智者教判式總結,不是三經逐字連引;不虛配單句來源
二十三「初坐道場,尚便成正覺,轉法輪,度眾生」〔T1911 0079c07〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223:「有菩薩摩訶薩初發意時,便得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提轉法輪,與無量阿僧祇眾生作益厚已」〔T223 0226a08〕初坐道場、初發意時及度眾生、作益厚等字異;場景與義序相合
二十四「應以佛身得度,即作佛身說法授藥;應以菩薩、二乘、天龍八部等形得度,而為現之」〔T1911 0079c27〕《妙法蓮華經》T262:「若有國土眾生應以佛身得度者,觀世音菩薩即現佛身而為說法;應以辟支佛身得度者,即現辟支佛身而為說法;應以聲聞身得度者,即現聲聞身而為說法」〔T262 0057a23〕作、現異;本論加入授藥並總攝菩薩與天龍八部

邪化三場景分別有如下傳本:

《摩訶止觀》原句今本對讀覆核
二十五之一「魔亦能以有漏心作無漏形,變為佛像」〔T1911 0080a21〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「若天魔梵為欲破壞,變為佛像,具足莊嚴三十二相、八十種好」〔T374 0397b01〕場景直接扣合
二十五之二「老子西升,亦云作佛化胡」〔T1911 0080a22〕《止觀輔行傳弘決》題《化胡經》並記其傳本判語〔T1912 0346b28〕無可承擔此句的單一現存經本,所指待考
二十五之三「諸外道等變釋為羊,停河在耳」〔T1911 0080a23〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「阿竭多仙十二年中,恒河之水停耳中」〔T374 0592b15〕;又「令釋身作羝羊形」〔T374 0592b17〕本論倒置兩場景次序並縮句

結遍三譬的今本如下:

《摩訶止觀》原句今本對讀覆核
二十六之一「如盲問乳,非乳真色」〔T1911 0080b01〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「如盲問乳,佛性亦爾」〔T374 0569a06〕本論取喻名並接自家判語
二十六之二「若繩若杵,何關象事」〔T1911 0080b01〕《大般涅槃經》T374:「其觸鼻者,言象如杵」〔T374 0556a15〕;又「其觸尾者,言象如繩」〔T374 0556a17〕本論把繩、杵次序倒置;場景同
二十六之三「囈言之見」〔T1911 0080b02〕異譯《大般涅槃經》T375:「寱言:『刀刀。』」〔T375 0653b07〕;《大般涅槃經》T374 另作「讇語刀刀」〔T374 0412b21〕囈、寱、讇三字並錄,不判版本優劣

四、輔行釋要〔鏡〕

《止觀輔行傳弘決》正釋本單元,起於「○次明入假破遍。初文意者大悲利物」〔T1912 0339b17〕,止於「此是第五示文旨也」〔T1912 0347c01〕;下一句已轉中道四門。

入假意先由利他定向。湛然說「初文意者大悲利物。是故二乘但住於空。不能從空出假利物」〔T1912 0339b18〕;空中種樹是出假之難,箭喻則以「後以方便箭射般若箭。不令墮於涅槃之地」〔T1912 0339c05〕限其方向。『同體』不是無緣同一實體,而是「見眾生苦同於己苦。名為同體。非謂無緣同實體也」〔T1912 0339c08〕。

五緣與五譬的對位,湛然完整列為:「有親如天性即同體也。有約謂要約即本誓也。有策謂奇謀即善巧也。有力謂勇健即利智也。有膽謂勇捍即精進也」〔T1912 0340b17〕。這一配對解開本論『親、約、策、力、膽』,但仍屬注釋層。

入假觀三法,湛然判「○次入假觀中列三法者。闕一不可」〔T1912 0340b20〕,並引《大般涅槃經》的大醫之說:「佛及菩薩為大醫故。名善知識。何以故。知病知藥應病授藥」〔T1912 0340b22〕。知見病時,結業是集、墮墜是苦,「苦集更互如旋火輪」〔T1912 0340c01〕;重數雖多,須守本論算法與校記,湛然只說「知重數中本文多有不同。但依算法合之」〔T1912 0341a10〕。預學五部律也不是堆塞記憶,而是「勸令預作助法眼因」〔T1912 0341b13〕。

識藥三分同屬從空出假之差別知。湛然判「並是菩薩從空出假破塵沙惑。應須遍識世法等三」〔T1912 0341c12〕,又明「故無明病非入假正意」〔T1912 0341c17〕。出世間上上法藥雖與前層名目相同,「釋義皆須歸於圓別」〔T1912 0342c19〕;世間、出世間、上上諸藥終不出四諦,故說「止觀所開不出四諦。乃至前來世出世及上上等。不出四諦」〔T1912 0343a22〕。

神農本方與華他、扁鵲新方,湛然判為通經造論:「神農如佛。華他等如出假菩薩。依經造論名為作方」〔T1912 0343b19〕。四根授藥則「以四教相望。作下中上上上之名」〔T1912 0344a01〕;一雲普雨的差別利益,是「雲現身也。雨說法也。天雨無私所稟各異」〔T1912 0344a19〕。

入假位不可只取某一經的一途。湛然說「權位下根入假未期。實位上根一生可到」〔T1912 0344a28〕;對八地出假之說則限為「一往隨機」,不可遍攝通方〔T1912 0344b28〕。大鳥譬又明本論是隨義轉用〔T1912 0345a07〕。圓教雖一心出入,仍能別出入,因為「一心亦能作別者。謂勝能兼劣能別能圓」〔T1912 0346a02〕。

利益段的嚴格位限在別、圓。湛然說「明出假利益者。欲明出假真實利益。必在別圓初地初住」〔T1912 0346a12〕,判藏、通「非真起應」〔T1912 0346a20〕,再以別教登地以上正明真應〔T1912 0346a28〕。這不抹去本論所說藏、通少分利益,只辨『真起應』的位義。

結遍先分文字次第與行意。湛然以「不次第假雖即從初不次第破。復約不次而論次位」〔T1912 0347b13〕說明不次第不礙施設次位;又把障通無知釋為障礙不思議化道神通之惑〔T1912 0347b18〕。末後一句「向之重沓不出一心」〔T1912 0347b27〕,收束前文繁複病藥與位次,而不取消其分辨功能。

五、諸家異釋

本單元有宋代四明一系直接扣合之問答。《四明尊者教行錄》T1937 篇題「教門雜問答七章」〔T1937 0882c18〕,責任文字為「四明法師問 門人〔自仁〕答」〔T1937 0882c19〕。第七問直指本相:

「七問。止觀破法遍中。先約四句破見思假。次約藥病破塵沙惑。後約真緣破無明惑。次第如此。如何謂之一心三觀破法遍耶」〔T1937 0884a02〕

答文先說「言不頓舒。文似次第。文雖次第。意實圓融」〔T1937 0884a05〕,再分「文似次第者。為對破三惑故。先空次假後中」〔T1937 0884a06〕與「意實圓融者。良由行人修之。乃舉一即三。非前非後」〔T1937 0884a07〕。這是宋世承受的文次、意圓判語,不倒灌為智者本句。

《四明十義書》T1936 有六個鄰接段落,均全列如下:

逐字見證關係
「乃用十乘法藥。委細治之」〔T1936 0834c08〕一般十乘法藥
「還曾於此境觀。分藥病否」〔T1936 0834c11〕一般境觀藥病
「亦由上人素不諳境觀藥病」〔T1936 0835c02〕一般境觀藥病
「用藥治病之義故也」〔T1936 0835c22〕一般能觀所觀與藥病
「如破法遍之後。例餘陰界入修圓破遍」〔T1936 0838a07〕破遍全科末例餘陰界入
「破遍文末例餘陰入。尚恐太早」〔T1936 0840a09〕同屬破遍末例

前四段是一般境觀藥病,後兩段是全科末例餘陰界入;六段都未同時具足從空入假、藥病與破塵沙三個本相要素。故只誌鄰接承受,不據有限命中建立全書負命題;山家、山外之諍亦只誌所見,不判是非。

六、術語

本論用法《止觀輔行傳弘決》釋讀
從空入假「從空入假,破他縛著,不同二乘」〔T1911 0075c05〕菩薩證空而不住空,能在空中分別藥病〔T1912 0339b29〕;不是退回實有
五緣慈悲心重、憶本誓願、智慧猛利、善巧方便、大精進力〔T1911 0075c11–27〕以親、約、力、策、膽顯其具足;其中四法是除利智外的四緣
同體哀傷「同體哀傷倍復隆重」〔T1911 0075c13〕見眾生苦如己苦,不作無緣同實體解〔T1912 0339c08〕
知病、識藥、授藥知見思病,識三種法藥,依苦集病授道滅藥三者闕一不可〔T1912 0340b20〕,共同構成入假觀
法眼、道種智「得法眼見,道種智知,分別思假病相分明」〔T1911 0077a15〕於一一法通以止觀研之而助發〔T1912 0341b05〕
三種法藥世間、出世間、出世間上上〔T1911 0077a19–21〕皆屬從空出假遍識差別法;上上藥名同而義歸圓、別
大醫「欲治一病,一藥即足;欲為大醫,遍須諸藥」〔T1911 0078a26〕約別教判作十行出假位〔T1912 0343a16〕
四根授藥下、中、上、上上〔T1911 0078c10–0079a05〕以四教相望立名〔T1912 0344a01〕
真起應「從真起應,法眼稱機」〔T1911 0079c26〕嚴格判在別教初地、圓教初住以上〔T1912 0346a12〕
障通無知「障通無知既破,雙照二諦」〔T1911 0080b12〕湛然釋為障不思議化道神通之惑〔T1912 0347b18〕
破法遍分別病、藥、授藥有所不達,便不名遍;不次第破方名遍文中仍可論次位,行意則不以前後隔裂三觀〔T1912 0347b13〕

七、譬喻、互讀與承衍

從空入假先以兩個近乎不可能的動作顯善巧:在空中種樹,使枝葉華果成就;向空中接連放箭,使後箭頂住前箭而不墮地。兩譬都不說菩薩拋棄空,而說智慧不墮偏空、方便仍能成辦利他。

五緣隨後化成親、約、策、力、膽,又用四種戰士辨智根與勇力:有身弱而膽勇,有身強而膽勇,有力而怯,有力膽俱無。入假不只看聰明利鈍;大悲、本誓、方便與精進能否具足,決定人是否走得出偏空。

知病、識藥、授藥把全段組成大醫之學。見思病有根本、因緣、久近、重數;法藥有世間、出世間、出世間上上;授藥又隨下、中、上、上上四根分別。神農本方與華他、扁鵲隨時另立方劑,說明經法不變成死方:鄉土南北、人有儜健、食藥濃淡、病有輕重,皆須審機分劑。

藥材的皮肉汁果、根莖枝葉,山海水陸與四方所出,採掘乾濕與時節不同,把『遍知』落在實際差別上。一寂定可開無量止,一大慧可開無量觀,仍如大河水分為升合,分劑不過不減。末以一雲普雨、草木各得生長,顯同一法雨不抹去受者根性。

位次段以七寶山顯聞勝而退,以無翅大鳥顯一向修空而方便不具;圓教又以一心出入而兼別出入,說明不次第並非沒有差別作用。利益段則把應身、說法、授藥連成一事:形貌神變本身不足證真,須看其是否從法身地稱機利物。

結遍再以盲人問乳、摸象得繩杵、病中囈語顯片面知見。前兩子位已詳破見、思,本單元轉而遍知病法、藥法、授藥法;末句又把文字次第推回行意,不次第才足以稱遍。

《止觀義例》T1913 以「文偏意圓」〔T1913 0448a02〕、「文雖次第行必隨人」〔T1913 0448a11〕、「竪破元為顯於不二」〔T1913 0448a12〕承接文次與體遍;又說「四入住應遍方名假遍。及以真遍」〔T1913 0451a01〕,只作湛然綱領。《止觀大意》T1914 以「於無生門遍破諸惑。復以無生度入餘門」〔T1914 0460c18〕與「縱橫俱破令識體遍」〔T1914 0460c19〕收束四門互入,亦不取代本論細科。

八、校本定位

本編以大正藏 T1911 為單一底本。正文換頁時,於該頁第一個段落或偈行之首標頁錨;錨點取首字前最近的大正行標。異讀只列本文採字與對校讀本原字,不判優劣。本單元共二十五條校記;表中【大】為大正底本,【甲】為德川刊島地大等氏藏本,【電子】為電子佛典校訂,【洪武】與【北藏】為相應對校本,空缺記為無。

行錨本文側對校讀本側
0075c23「辦」〔T1911 0075c23〕【大】「辨」〔T1911 0075c23〕【甲】
0076b04「貧」〔T1911 0076b04〕【大】「資」〔T1911 0076b04〕【甲】
0076b10「異」〔T1911 0076b10〕【大】「亦異」〔T1911 0076b10〕【甲】
0076b25「單」〔T1911 0076b25〕【大】「此就單」〔T1911 0076b25〕【甲】
0076c25「十」〔T1911 0076c25〕【大】「三十」〔T1911 0076c25〕【甲】
0077a03「十」〔T1911 0077a03〕【大】「一十」〔T1911 0077a03〕【甲】
0077a04「二」〔T1911 0077a04〕【大】「三」〔T1911 0077a04〕【甲】
0077a16「明」〔T1911 0077a16〕【大】「別」〔T1911 0077a16〕【甲】
0077a20「間」〔T1911 0077a20〕【大】「聞」〔T1911 0077a20〕【甲】
0077a21「三」〔T1911 0077a21〕【大】「一三」〔T1911 0077a21〕【甲】
十一0077a22「無」〔T1911 0077a22〕【大】「四無」〔T1911 0077a22〕【甲】
十二0077a24「惠」〔T1911 0077a24〕【大】「意」〔T1911 0077a24〕【甲】 惠取恩惠義、意取何意義,兩讀皆通;今守底本讀惠,白話作有何恩惠
十三0077a27「施」〔T1911 0077a27〕【大】「世」〔T1911 0077a27〕【甲】
十四0078b06「集」〔T1911 0078b06〕【大】「苦集」〔T1911 0078b06〕【甲】
十五0078b10「上」〔T1911 0078b10〕【大】「之上」〔T1911 0078b10〕【甲】
十六0078b13「下」〔T1911 0078b13〕【大】「之下」〔T1911 0078b13〕【甲】
十七0078c02「旦」〔T1911 0078c02〕【大】「且」〔T1911 0078c02〕【甲】
十八0078c15「下根病也」〔T1911 0078c15〕【大】無【甲】
十九0078c18「說」〔T1911 0078c18〕【電子】【洪武】【北藏】「論」〔T1911 0078c18〕【大】;「說」〔T1911 0078c18〕【甲】
二十0078c20「說」〔T1911 0078c20〕【大】「說者」〔T1911 0078c20〕【甲】
二十一0079a11「先」〔T1911 0079a11〕【大】「明」〔T1911 0079a11〕【甲】
二十二0079a22「斷」〔T1911 0079a22〕【大】「繼」〔T1911 0079a22〕【甲】
二十三0079a22「祇」〔T1911 0079a22〕【大】「秪」〔T1911 0079a22〕【甲】
二十四0079b15「于」〔T1911 0079b15〕【大】「千」〔T1911 0079b15〕【甲】
二十五0080b13「而言」〔T1911 0080b13〕【大】「言之」〔T1911 0080b13〕【甲】

卷題另保留兩枚所傳夾註:卷六上作〔上〕,卷六下作〔下〕;二者是卷次標記,不另視為正文異讀。

This unit is the third substage of pervasive breaking through Dharmas within proper contemplation of the ten objects. Zhiyi turns from entering emptiness through provisionality to emerging from emptiness into the provisional. He first explains the intent to benefit others and five kinds of cause and condition; next unfolds contemplation entering provisionality through knowing illness, recognizing medicine, and administering medicine; then judges stages and benefits through the Tripiṭaka, Shared, Distinct, and Perfect Teachings; and finally concludes the meaning of “pervasive” through nonsequential breaking. The passage combines dense calculations, medical similes, stages of the four teachings, and gathered scriptural citations. The treatise’s direct statements, Zhanran’s judgments, received parallels, and later reception each have different sources and levels.

1. Doctrinal-Outline Placement

This unit begins with 「○第二、從空入假破法遍者,即為四」 tr. “Second, pervasive breaking through Dharmas by entering the provisional from emptiness has four parts”〔T1911 0075b27〕 and ends with 「前觀法重沓既多,恐人迷故,約二觀後結破法遍也」 tr. “Because the preceding contemplative Dharmas overlap repeatedly and are numerous, it is feared that people may become confused; therefore pervasive breaking through Dharmas is concluded after the two contemplations”〔T1911 0080b15〕. The next passage, 「○第三、明中道止觀破法遍者」 tr. “Third, explaining pervasive breaking through Dharmas through Middle-Way calming-and-contemplation”〔T1911 0080b16〕, already belongs to Middle-Way calming-and-contemplation. Both boundaries share line anchors with neighboring passages, so divisions are determined by paragraphs rather than by treating line-number order as a substitute for sectional boundaries.

The treatise first lists four divisions: the intent of entering provisionality, causes and conditions for entering provisionality, contemplation entering provisionality, and stages of entering provisionality. The fourth then lists three internal topics: first judging stages through the teachings, explaining benefits, and concluding pervasive breaking through Dharmas. According to the main text and the direct commentary of the Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan, the reading path is as follows:

SectionRange in the treatiseContentCorresponding Fuxing Chuanhong Jue passage
10075b29–0075c10Intent of entering provisionality0339b18–0339c07
20075c11–0076a18Five conditions for entering provisionality, five intents in the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa, and analysis of sharp and dull faculties0339c08–0340b20
3.10076a19–0077a18Knowing the illnesses of views and thought within contemplation entering provisionality0340b20–0341b21
3.20077a19–0078b27Recognizing the three medicines: worldly, world-transcending, and supremely world-transcending0341b22–0343c11
3.30078b28–0079a09Administering medicine according to illness0343c12–0344a22
4.10079a10–0079c23Judging stages for entering provisionality through the Tripiṭaka, Shared, Distinct, and Perfect Teachings0344a23–0346a11
4.20079c24–0080a27Benefits of entering provisionality and deviant and correct transformations0346a12–0346c09
4.30080a28–0080b15Concluding pervasive breaking through Dharmas0346c10–0347c02

The treatise explicitly lists 「明入假觀者,即為三:一、知病,二、識藥,三、授藥」 tr. “Explaining contemplation entering provisionality has three parts: first, knowing illness; second, recognizing medicine; third, administering medicine”〔T1911 0076a19〕. These three form the internal sequence of contemplation entering provisionality. It also says 「明入假位者:一、先歷教判位,二、明利益,三、結破法遍」 tr. “Explaining the stages of entering provisionality: first, judge stages through the teachings; second, clarify benefits; third, conclude pervasive breaking through Dharmas”〔T1911 0079a11〕, making clear that benefits and the conclusion of pervasive breaking remain within the fourth major division. Although this reading path distinguishes eight sections, it must not be inverted into a claim that Zhiyi originally listed eight divisions.

2. Formation and Transmission

This unit inherits the account in “Origins” of Zhiyi teaching during one summer at Yuquan, Guanding’s record, and the incompletion of the extant text. Its direct teaching continues across the first and second parts of fascicle six. The transmission through three versions and the history of the third revised text are detailed in “Origins”; they are linked here only briefly, without adjudicating meaning according to the chronological order of conflated editions.

3. Verification of the Scriptures and Treatises Cited

The twenty-six groups of explicitly titled works, gathered citations, and identifiable scenes are listed below in the treatise’s sequence. The left column preserves the original graphs of the Mohe Zhiguan; the right uses only the title at the head of the relevant canonical work and an abbreviated canon number. Identical wording, excerpts, composites, variants, and referents still under investigation are recorded side by side without adjudication.

Intent, Five Conditions, and Knowing Illness

GroupOriginal sentence in the Mohe ZhiguanReceived parallelCheck
1「善巧方便如空中種樹」 tr. “Skillful means resembles planting a tree in empty space”〔T1911 0075c08〕Great Treatise T1509: 「譬如人欲於虛空中種樹,是為甚難」 tr. “It resembles a person wishing to plant a tree in empty space; this is exceedingly difficult”〔T1509 0651c12〕“In space” and “in empty space” differ; the treatise gathers the passage into the name of a simile
1「又如仰射空中,筈筈相拄,不令墮地」 tr. “It is also like shooting upward into the sky, each arrow’s nock supporting the preceding arrow and not letting it fall to earth”〔T1911 0075c08〕Great Treatise T1509: 「譬如仰射空中,箭箭相柱,不令落地」 tr. “It resembles shooting upward into the sky, each arrow supporting the preceding arrow and not letting it fall to earth”〔T1509 0197c17〕; also 「譬如仰射虛空,箭箭相拄,不令墮地」 tr. “It resembles shooting upward into empty space, each arrow supporting the preceding arrow and not letting it fall to earth”〔T1509 0323a03〕The treatise combines the received readings “in the sky,” “supporting,” and “fall to earth” from two locations
2「諸法實性相,二乘亦皆得,而不名為佛」 tr. “The real nature and marks of Dharmas are also all attained by the Two Vehicles, yet they are not called buddhas”〔T1911 0075c03〕Avataṃsaka Sūtra T278: 「諸法實性相,常住無變異,二乘亦得此,而不名為佛」 tr. “The real nature and marks of Dharmas constantly abide without change; the Two Vehicles also attain this, yet they are not called buddhas”〔T278 0566c19〕The received text additionally has “constantly abide without change”; “also all attain” differs from “also attain this”
4「一、知病,二、識藥,三、授藥」 tr. “First, know illness; second, recognize medicine; third, administer medicine”〔T1911 0076a20〕Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra T374: 「知病、知藥、應病授藥故」 tr. “Because one knows illness, knows medicine, and administers medicine according to illness”〔T374 0511b16〕“Recognize medicine” and “know medicine” differ; the three Dharmas occur in the same order
5「若准見惑四十里水,此緣一諦,應是一十里水」 tr. “If afflictions of views are compared to forty li of water, this conditions one truth and should equal ten li of water”〔T1911 0077a08〕Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra T374: 「須陀洹人所斷煩惱,猶如縱廣四十里水,其餘在者如一毛渧」 tr. “The afflictions severed by a stream-enterer resemble a body of water forty li long and wide; what remains is like one drop on a hair”〔T374 0577b18〕Ten li for one truth is Zhiyi’s calculation based on the four truths. The received text contrasts forty li with one hair-drop
6「五部律不填人胸」 tr. “The Vinayas of the five schools do not fill a person’s breast”〔T1911 0077a17〕The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan, T1912, lists the Dharmaguptaka Four-Part, Sarvāstivāda Ten Recitations, Mahīśāsaka Five-Part, Vātsīputrīya Future, and Kāśyapīya Liberation as five schools〔T1912 0341b16〕“Five schools” names a Vinaya group and is not forcibly attached to one work

The Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra’s passage on asking about illness is opened in the treatise as three kinds of consolation and five intents. Each received item follows:

GroupOriginal sentence in the Mohe ZhiguanReceived T475 Vimalakīrtinirdeśa SūtraCheck
3「先明觀身無常等」 tr. “First explain contemplation of the body as impermanent and the rest”〔T1911 0075c28〕「說身無常,不說厭離於身」 tr. “Teach the body as impermanent without teaching aversion toward the body”〔T475 0544c18〕The treatise’s “and the rest” gathers the following statements
3「當作醫王」 tr. “One should become a king of physicians”〔T1911 0075c29〕「當作醫王,療治眾病」 tr. “One should become a king of physicians and cure every illness”〔T475 0544c24〕Excerpt
3「以己之疾愍於彼疾」 tr. “Through one’s own illness, have compassion for their illness”〔T1911 0076a01〕「以己之疾,愍於彼疾」 tr. “Through one’s own illness, have compassion for their illness”〔T475 0544c22〕The graphs agree; punctuation differs
3「當識宿世無數劫苦」 tr. “One should recognize the suffering of innumerable eons in past lives”〔T1911 0076a02〕「當識宿世無數劫苦」 tr. “One should recognize the suffering of innumerable eons in past lives”〔T475 0544c22〕Identical wording
3「當念饒益一切眾生」 tr. “One should remember to benefit all beings”〔T1911 0076a03〕「當念饒益一切眾生」 tr. “One should remember to benefit all beings”〔T475 0544c23〕Identical wording
3「憶所修福,念於淨命」 tr. “Recall the merit cultivated and remain mindful of pure livelihood”〔T1911 0076a04〕「憶所修福,念於淨命」 tr. “Recall the merit cultivated and remain mindful of pure livelihood”〔T475 0544c23〕Identical wording
3「勿生憂惱,常起精進」 tr. “Do not produce sorrow and distress; constantly arouse effort”〔T1911 0076a05〕「勿生憂惱,常起精進」 tr. “Do not produce sorrow and distress; constantly arouse effort”〔T475 0544c24〕Identical wording

The classification of the three consolations as empty, provisional, and Middle is not present as three labels in T475. The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan explicitly records 「此是大師判釋淨名問疾品中為三慰喻」 tr. “This is the Great Master’s classificatory interpretation of three consolations within the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa chapter on asking about illness”〔T1912 0339c14〕. The scriptural wording and Zhiyi’s classification must therefore remain on separate levels.

Worldly, World-Transcending, and Supremely World-Transcending Dharma-Medicines

GroupOriginal sentence in the Mohe ZhiguanReceived parallelCheck
7「三歸、五戒、十善道、四禪、無量心等,名世間法施;二、出世間法施;三、出世間上上法施」 tr. “The three refuges, five precepts, ten wholesome paths, four dhyānas, immeasurable minds, and the rest are called worldly Dharma-giving; second is world-transcending Dharma-giving; third is supremely world-transcending Dharma-giving”〔T1911 0077a21〕Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra T223 has 「教三歸依」 tr. “teach the three refuges”〔T223 0394a18〕, 「或教受五戒,或教一日戒,或教初禪」 tr. “or teach receipt of the five precepts, a one-day precept, or the first dhyāna”〔T223 0394a19〕, and 「或教慈悲喜捨」 tr. “or teach loving-kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity”〔T223 0394a21〕; it later says 「法施有二種:一者世間,二者出世間」 tr. “Dharma-giving has two kinds: first worldly, second world-transcending”〔T223 0394b04〕The received materials are dispersed and classified as two, while the treatise gives three. The Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra T670 separately has 「世間、出世間、出世間上上法」 tr. “worldly, world-transcending, and supremely world-transcending Dharmas”〔T670 0483b18〕, but does not call them three kinds of Dharma-giving
8「譬如王子從高墮下,父王愛念,積以繒綿於地接之,令免苦痛」 tr. “It resembles a prince falling from a height; the royal father, loving and mindful of him, piles silk floss on the ground to catch him and spare him pain”〔T1911 0077a24〕Great Treatise T1509: 「如國王子在高危處立,不可救護,欲自投地;王使人敷厚綿褥,墮則不死,差於墮地故」 tr. “A royal prince stands in a high and dangerous place where he cannot be rescued and intends to throw himself down; the king has people spread thick cotton bedding so he will not die when he falls, unlike falling directly to earth”〔T1509 0227c19〕Royal father differs from the king having others act; silk floss from thick cotton bedding; avoiding pain from not dying, among other variants
9「一切世間外道經書皆是佛說,非外道說」 tr. “All worldly non-Buddhist scriptures and books are taught by the Buddha, not by non-Buddhists”〔T1911 0077a29〕Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra T374: 「所有種種異論、呪術、言語、文字,皆是佛說,非外道說」 tr. “All various heterodox treatises, spells, language, and writing are taught by the Buddha, not by non-Buddhists”〔T374 0412c29〕The treatise gathers the received enumeration under “worldly non-Buddhist scriptures and books”
10「一切世間所有善論皆因此經」 tr. “Every wholesome worldly treatise derives from this scripture”〔T1911 0077b01〕Golden Light Sūtra T663: 「世間出世間所作國事,所造世論皆因此經」 tr. “Worldly and world-transcending affairs of state and composed worldly treatises all derive from this scripture”〔T663 0344a09〕“Wholesome treatises” differs from “composed worldly treatises”; the received text also includes affairs of state

The treatise correlates the five constants with the five precepts, the five phases with the five precepts, and the Rites, Music, Odes, Documents, and Changes with the five precepts〔T1911 0077b02–13〕. These are functional correlations, not verbatim citations from the five books, and no canon number applies. The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan further uses the Baihu Tong and Bowu Zhi to integrate the five phases〔T1912 0342a04〕; this belongs only to Zhanran’s supplementary explanation.

GroupOriginal sentence in the Mohe ZhiguanReceived parallelCheck
12「凡夫雖修有漏禪,其心行穿如漏器;雖生非想當復退還,如雨彩衣其色駮脫」 tr. “Although ordinary people cultivate contaminated dhyāna, their mental practice is perforated like a leaking vessel; although born at neither-perception, they will retreat again, like rain mottling the color of dyed cloth”〔T1911 0077b19〕Sūtra on the Ground of Cultivating the Path T606: 「設使始學得漏禪,其修行穿如漏器,雖生梵天當復還,如雨綵衣其色變」 tr. “Even if a beginner attains contaminated dhyāna, the practice is perforated like a leaking vessel; although born in Brahmā heaven, one will return, like rain changing the color of dyed cloth”〔T606 0213b05〕The leaking vessel, return, and dyed-cloth-in-rain scene agree; ordinary person differs from beginner, neither-perception from Brahmā heaven, and mottling from color change. The received passage is only parallel testimony; the referent remains under investigation
13From 「或說信為道,或說樂欲,或說不放逸」 tr. “Sometimes faith is taught as the path, sometimes joyous aspiration, sometimes heedfulness”〔T1911 0077b22〕 through 「或說修慈」 tr. “sometimes cultivation of loving-kindness is taught”〔T1911 0077b25〕Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra T374 begins with 「如來或說信心為道」 tr. “The Tathāgata sometimes teaches faithful mind as the path”〔T374 0441b07〕 and continues with heedfulness, effort, mindfulness of body, correct concentration, buddha-recollection samādhi, perception of impermanence, forest dwelling, teaching Dharma to others, keeping precepts, approaching good friends, and cultivating loving-kindnessThe treatise omits the supporting statements for each item and separately includes joyous aspiration; that item does not occur in the received sequence
14「他物莫取,一切法皆是他物;於一切法不受成羅漢」 tr. “Do not take what belongs to another; every Dharma belongs to another. By not accepting any Dharma, one becomes an arhat”〔T1911 0077b27〕Brief Essentials of Contemplative Methods T617 has 「他物莫取」 tr. “Do not take what belongs to another”〔T617 0298a09〕; Essential Methods of the Five-Gate Dhyāna Sūtra T619 likewise has 「他物莫取」 tr. “Do not take what belongs to another”〔T619 0332c01〕Both received works contain the scene of asking for the path beside the Ganges, but neither has the latter two sentences. No unique scripture title is given; the referent remains under investigation
15「依隨經法,廣立名字而為作義,名為法施」 tr. “Following scriptural Dharma, broadly establish names and compose meanings; this is called Dharma-giving”〔T1911 0078b25〕Great Treatise T1509: 「依隨經法,自演作義理、譬喻,莊嚴法施,為眾生說」 tr. “Following scriptural Dharma, one unfolds and composes meanings, principles, and similes, adorns Dharma-giving, and teaches beings”〔T1509 0227b20〕Broadly establishing names differs from unfolding meanings, principles, and similes; “is called” differs from “adorns,” among other variants

The treatise says 「我遣三聖化彼真丹」 tr. “I sent three noble ones to transform that China”〔T1911 0078c06〕 without naming a work. The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan supplies the title Sūtra of Pure Dharma Practice and says 「月光菩薩彼稱顏回。光淨菩薩彼稱仲尼。迦葉菩薩彼稱老子」 tr. “There Moonlight Bodhisattva was called Yan Hui, Pure-Light Bodhisattva was called Confucius, and Kāśyapa Bodhisattva was called Laozi”〔T1912 0343c18〕. It immediately records 「准諸目錄皆推此經以為疑偽」 tr. “According to the catalogues, all classify this scripture as suspect and spurious”〔T1912 0343c20〕. The Kaiyuan Catalogue of Buddhist Teachings T2154 records 「清淨法行經〔已上三經先在偽錄〕」 tr.Sūtra of Pure Dharma Practice〔the preceding three scriptures previously appeared in catalogues of spurious works〕”〔T2154 0485a20〕, while the Zhenyuan Newly Revised Catalogue of Buddhist Teachings T2157 records 「清淨法行經一卷記說孔老顏回事」 tr. “One fascicle of the Sūtra of Pure Dharma Practice, recording matters concerning Confucius, Laozi, and Yan Hui”〔T2157 1015c23〕. No single scriptural text survives that can serve as the source work. Only its transmission status is recorded; the catalogues’ judgment is not replaced.

The four titles correlated in the treatise with the gates of existence, nonexistence, both, and neither have distinct transmission states:

GroupTitle and use in the treatiseReceived stateCheck
17.1Abhidharma〔T1911 0078c16〕 teaches the gate of existenceAbhidharma is a generic class; the passage specifies no single treatiseReferent under investigation; not forcibly attached to one treatise
17.2「說《成實論》,生其小善」 tr. “Teach the Satyasiddhi Treatise and produce their small wholesome roots”〔T1911 0078c18〕The heading of fascicle one in T1646 is 「成實論卷第一」 tr.Satyasiddhi Treatise, fascicle one”〔T1646 0239a03〕The title Satyasiddhi Treatise, T1646, agrees; the treatise does not quote a sentence verbatim
17.3The Kunle Treatise〔T1911 0078c19〕 teaches the gate of existence and nonexistenceNo single source work survives in the present canonReferent under investigation
17.4「說《離有無經》,生善破惡入真」 tr. “Teach the Sūtra of Leaving Existence and Nonexistence, produce wholesome roots, break evil, and enter the true”〔T1911 0078c20〕The Satyasiddhi Treatise, T1646, has 「應為車匿說離有無經」 tr. “One should teach Chanda the Sūtra of Leaving Existence and Nonexistence”〔T1646 0240a03〕The old testimony establishes only title and scene, not the survival of a complete scripture; the referent remains under investigation

Administering Medicine, Judging Stages, Benefits, and the Conclusion of Pervasiveness

GroupOriginal sentence in the Mohe ZhiguanReceived parallelCheck
18「如一雲所雨,而諸草木各得生長」 tr. “Like rain from one cloud, through which the various plants and trees each gain growth”〔T1911 0079a09〕Lotus Sūtra T262: 「一雲所雨,稱其種性而得生長華菓敷實」 tr. “Rain from one cloud accords with their kinds and natures, bringing growth, flowers, fruits, unfolding, and ripening”〔T262 0019b04〕; also 「而諸草木,各有差別」 tr. “Yet the various plants and trees each differ”〔T262 0019b06〕The treatise gathers the two sentences; “each gains growth” is not a continuous received phrase
19「譬如有人俱聞他方有七寶山,翹心束脚;若念路艱險,便退不前」 tr. “It resembles people who together hear of a mountain of seven treasures in another region and lift their hearts and bind their feet; if they think the road difficult and dangerous, they retreat and do not advance”〔T1911 0079a16〕Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra T374: 「譬如二人俱聞他方有七寶山」 tr. “It resembles two people who together hear of a mountain of seven treasures in another region”〔T374 0534b12〕; also 「唯路懸遠,嶮阻多難」 tr. “Only the road is suspended and distant, steep, obstructed, and full of difficulties”〔T374 0534b14〕The treatise compresses the simile of two persons advancing and retreating
19「自惟敗種,泣動大千」 tr. “Considering themselves ruined seeds, they weep and shake the great-thousand world”〔T1911 0079a18〕Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra T475: 「我等何為永絕其根,於此大乘已如敗種」 tr. “Why have we forever cut off the root? Within this Great Vehicle we are already like ruined seeds”〔T475 0547a08〕; also 「皆應號泣,聲震三千大千世界」 tr. “All should wail, their voices shaking the great trichiliocosm”〔T475 0547a10〕The treatise combines the ruined-seed and wailing statements
20「八地修出假;或六地、七地斷結與羅漢齊,方修出假」 tr. “Cultivate emergence into provisionality on the eighth ground; or sever fetters on the sixth or seventh ground, equal an arhat, and only then cultivate emergence into provisionality”〔T1911 0079b03〕The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan says only 「於諸經中有此一往隨機之說。未可遍該通方之意」 tr. “The scriptures contain this initial teaching according to faculties; it cannot comprehensively cover the universally applicable intent”〔T1912 0344b28〕No single continuous root-scripture passage has been found to support the original sentence. The referent remains under investigation, and a later doctrinal classification is not substituted for scriptural wording
21「有大鳥身長三百由旬而無兩翅,從天而墮,若死、若死等苦」 tr. “There is a great bird three hundred yojanas long without two wings; falling from heaven, it undergoes death or suffering equal to death”〔T1911 0079b13〕Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra T223: 「有鳥身長百由旬若二百三百由旬而無有翅,從三十三天自投閻浮提」 tr. “There is a bird one hundred, two hundred, or three hundred yojanas long without wings that throws itself from the Heaven of the Thirty-Three down to Jambudvīpa”〔T223 0336b23〕; also 「若痛若惱若死、若死等苦」 tr. “pain, distress, death, or suffering equal to death”〔T223 0336c01〕The treatise selects one of the three lengths and combines it with the suffering of the fall
21Same as aboveGreat Treatise T1509: 「金翅鳥在於天上」 tr. “The garuḍa is in heaven”〔T1509 0566b19〕, followed by interpreting lack of prajñā and skillful means as the absence of two wingsThe treatise combines scripture and commentary. The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan explicitly says 「今文兩釋並是大師隨義轉用」 tr. “Both explanations in the present text are the Great Master’s adaptive reuse according to meaning”〔T1912 0345a07〕
22「《華嚴》、《大品》不能治之,唯有《法華》能令無學還生善根」 tr. “The Avataṃsaka and the Great Version cannot treat them; only the Lotus can make those beyond training produce wholesome roots again”〔T1911 0079b20〕The works named are respectively the Avataṃsaka Sūtra, T278; Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra, T223; and Lotus Sūtra, T262This is Zhiyi’s doctrinal summary, not a continuous verbatim citation from the three scriptures; no sentence-source is falsely assigned
23「初坐道場,尚便成正覺,轉法輪,度眾生」 tr. “On first sitting at the site of awakening, one may immediately accomplish correct awakening, turn the Dharma wheel, and deliver beings”〔T1911 0079c07〕Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra T223: 「有菩薩摩訶薩初發意時,便得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提轉法輪,與無量阿僧祇眾生作益厚已」 tr. “When some bodhisattva mahāsattvas first arouse the aspiration, they immediately attain unsurpassed complete awakening, turn the Dharma wheel, and greatly benefit immeasurable incalculable beings”〔T223 0226a08〕“First sitting at the site of awakening” differs from “first arousing the aspiration,” and “delivering beings” from “greatly benefiting them”; scene and sequence agree
24「應以佛身得度,即作佛身說法授藥;應以菩薩、二乘、天龍八部等形得度,而為現之」 tr. “For those to be delivered through a buddha-body, make a buddha-body, teach Dharma, and administer medicine; for those to be delivered through the forms of bodhisattvas, the Two Vehicles, gods, nāgas, the eight classes, and the rest, manifest them”〔T1911 0079c27〕Lotus Sūtra T262: 「若有國土眾生應以佛身得度者,觀世音菩薩即現佛身而為說法;應以辟支佛身得度者,即現辟支佛身而為說法;應以聲聞身得度者,即現聲聞身而為說法」 tr. “For beings in a land who should be delivered through a buddha-body, Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva immediately manifests a buddha-body and teaches them Dharma; for those to be delivered through a pratyekabuddha-body, he immediately manifests a pratyekabuddha-body and teaches Dharma; for those to be delivered through a śrāvaka-body, he immediately manifests a śrāvaka-body and teaches Dharma”〔T262 0057a23〕“Make” differs from “manifest”; the treatise adds administering medicine and collectively includes bodhisattvas and the eight classes of gods and nāgas

The three scenes of deviant transformation have the following transmitted forms:

GroupOriginal sentence in the Mohe ZhiguanReceived parallelCheck
25.1「魔亦能以有漏心作無漏形,變為佛像」 tr. “Māra too can use a contaminated mind to produce an uncontaminated form and transform into a buddha image”〔T1911 0080a21〕Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra T374: 「若天魔梵為欲破壞,變為佛像,具足莊嚴三十二相、八十種好」 tr. “If celestial Māras or Brahmās wish to destroy, they transform into buddha images fully adorned with thirty-two marks and eighty excellences”〔T374 0397b01〕The scenes correspond directly
25.2「老子西升,亦云作佛化胡」 tr. “Laozi ascended westward and is also said to have become a buddha to transform the Hu peoples”〔T1911 0080a22〕The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan names the Scripture on Transforming the Hu and records its transmitted judgment〔T1912 0346b28〕No single extant scripture can support the sentence; referent under investigation
25.3「諸外道等變釋為羊,停河在耳」 tr. “The non-Buddhists and others transformed Śakra into a ram and held the river in an ear”〔T1911 0080a23〕Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra T374: 「阿竭多仙十二年中,恒河之水停耳中」 tr. “For twelve years the sage Agastya held the waters of the Ganges in his ear”〔T374 0592b15〕; also 「令釋身作羝羊形」 tr. “He made Śakra’s body take the form of a ram”〔T374 0592b17〕The treatise reverses the order of the two scenes and compresses them

The received forms of the three similes concluding pervasiveness follow:

GroupOriginal sentence in the Mohe ZhiguanReceived parallelCheck
26.1「如盲問乳,非乳真色」 tr. “Like a blind person asking about milk: it is not milk’s true color”〔T1911 0080b01〕Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra T374: 「如盲問乳,佛性亦爾」 tr. “Like a blind person asking about milk; buddha-nature is likewise”〔T374 0569a06〕The treatise takes the name of the simile and adds its own judgment
26.2「若繩若杵,何關象事」 tr. “Whether rope or pestle, how does it concern the elephant?”〔T1911 0080b01〕Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra T374: 「其觸鼻者,言象如杵」 tr. “The one who touches its trunk says the elephant resembles a pestle”〔T374 0556a15〕; also 「其觸尾者,言象如繩」 tr. “The one who touches its tail says the elephant resembles a rope”〔T374 0556a17〕The treatise reverses the order of rope and pestle; the scene agrees
26.3「囈言之見」 tr. “a view like delirious speech”〔T1911 0080b02〕The alternate Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra translation T375 has 「寱言:『刀刀。』」 tr. “talking in sleep: ‘knife, knife’”〔T375 0653b07〕; the Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra T374 instead has 「讇語刀刀」 tr. “flattering speech: ‘knife, knife’”〔T374 0412b21〕The three graphs for delirious speech, sleep-talking, and flattering speech are recorded without adjudicating the superior version

4. Essential Explanations from the Fuxing [the Mirror]

The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan directly comments on this unit from 「○次明入假破遍。初文意者大悲利物」 tr. “Next, it explains pervasiveness in breaking through by entering the provisional. The purport of the opening passage is great compassion benefiting beings”〔T1912 0339b17〕 through 「此是第五示文旨也」 tr. “This is the fifth, revealing the purport of the text”〔T1912 0347c01〕. The next sentence has already turned to the four gates of the Middle Way.

The intent of entering the provisional is first oriented by benefiting others. Zhanran says, 「初文意者大悲利物。是故二乘但住於空。不能從空出假利物」 tr. “The purport of the opening passage is great compassion benefiting beings. Therefore the Two Vehicles only abide in emptiness and cannot emerge from emptiness into the provisional to benefit beings”〔T1912 0339b18〕. Planting a tree in empty space shows the difficulty of emerging into the provisional, while the arrow simile fixes its direction: 「後以方便箭射般若箭。不令墮於涅槃之地」 tr. “Afterward, one shoots the arrow of prajñā with the arrow of skillful means, not allowing it to fall onto the ground of nirvāṇa”〔T1912 0339c05〕. “Same body” does not mean an unconditioned identity of substance: 「見眾生苦同於己苦。名為同體。非謂無緣同實體也」 tr. “Seeing the suffering of beings as the same as one’s own suffering is called same body; it does not mean an unconditioned sameness of real substance”〔T1912 0339c08〕.

Zhanran fully lists the correspondences between the five conditions and five similes: 「有親如天性即同體也。有約謂要約即本誓也。有策謂奇謀即善巧也。有力謂勇健即利智也。有膽謂勇捍即精進也」 tr. “Having kinship resembles an inborn bond and is precisely same body; having a compact means a binding covenant and is precisely the original vow; having strategy means an extraordinary plan and is precisely skillful means; having strength means bravery and vigor and is precisely sharp wisdom; having courage means bold intrepidity and is precisely diligence”〔T1912 0340b17〕. This pairing resolves the treatise’s kinship, compact, strategy, strength, and courage, while remaining on the commentarial layer.

For the three Dharmas of contemplation in entering the provisional, Zhanran judges, 「○次入假觀中列三法者。闕一不可」 tr. “Next, the three Dharmas listed in the contemplation of entering the provisional: not one may be lacking”〔T1912 0340b20〕. He then cites the Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra on the great physician: 「佛及菩薩為大醫故。名善知識。何以故。知病知藥應病授藥」 tr. “Because buddhas and bodhisattvas are great physicians, they are called good spiritual friends. Why? They know illnesses, know medicines, and administer medicine according to illness”〔T1912 0340b22〕. In knowing the illness of views, fettering karma is origination and falling into painful destinations is suffering: 「苦集更互如旋火輪」 tr. “Suffering and origination alternate like a whirling wheel of fire”〔T1912 0340c01〕. Although the counts of grades are numerous, one must keep to the treatise’s computation and critical notes; Zhanran says only, 「知重數中本文多有不同。但依算法合之」 tr. “Know that within the count of repeated grades the base texts have many differences; simply reconcile them according to the method of calculation”〔T1912 0341a10〕. Preliminary study of the five divisions of the Vinaya is not an accumulation of memorized material but 「勸令預作助法眼因」 tr. “an exhortation to prepare in advance a cause assisting the Dharma eye”〔T1912 0341b13〕.

The three divisions of knowing medicine all belong to differentiated knowledge in emerging from emptiness into the provisional. Zhanran judges, 「並是菩薩從空出假破塵沙惑。應須遍識世法等三」 tr. “All concern bodhisattvas emerging from emptiness into the provisional and breaking delusions innumerable as dust and sand; they must pervasively know the three, worldly Dharmas and the rest”〔T1912 0341c12〕, and further clarifies, 「故無明病非入假正意」 tr. “Thus the illness of ignorance is not the direct intent of entering the provisional”〔T1912 0341c17〕. Although the names of supramundane supreme medicines are the same as at the preceding layer, 「釋義皆須歸於圓別」 tr. “their interpreted meanings must all return to the Perfect and Distinct”〔T1912 0342c19〕. Worldly, supramundane, and supreme medicines ultimately do not go beyond the Four Truths: 「止觀所開不出四諦。乃至前來世出世及上上等。不出四諦」 tr. “What calming-and-contemplation unfolds does not go beyond the Four Truths; even the foregoing worldly, supramundane, supreme, and other teachings do not go beyond the Four Truths”〔T1912 0343a22〕.

Zhanran judges Shennong’s original prescriptions and the new prescriptions of Hua Tuo and Bian Que as transmitting scripture and composing treatise: 「神農如佛。華他等如出假菩薩。依經造論名為作方」 tr. “Shennong is like the Buddha; Hua Tuo and the others are like bodhisattvas emerging into the provisional. Composing treatises in reliance on scriptures is called making prescriptions”〔T1912 0343b19〕. In administering medicine to four faculties, 「以四教相望。作下中上上上之名」 tr. “the four teachings are viewed in relation to one another to establish the names lower, middling, higher, and supreme”〔T1912 0344a01〕. The differentiated benefit of rain falling universally from one cloud is explained as 「雲現身也。雨說法也。天雨無私所稟各異」 tr. “The cloud is manifestation of bodies; the rain is teaching Dharma. Heavenly rain is impartial, yet what each receives differs”〔T1912 0344a19〕.

The stage of entering the provisional cannot be taken solely from one provisional teaching of a particular scripture. Zhanran says, 「權位下根入假未期。實位上根一生可到」 tr. “For lower faculties in provisional stages, entering the provisional has no fixed time; higher faculties in real stages can arrive within one lifetime”〔T1912 0344a28〕. The statement about emerging into the provisional on the eighth ground is limited to 「一往隨機」 tr. “an initial explanation according to faculties” and cannot pervasively encompass the universally applicable intent〔T1912 0344b28〕. The great-bird simile likewise shows that the treatise adaptively reuses material according to meaning〔T1912 0345a07〕. Although the Perfect Teaching enters and emerges within one mind, it can still enter and emerge distinctly, because 「一心亦能作別者。謂勝能兼劣能別能圓」 tr. “One mind can also make distinctions: the superior can encompass the inferior, and can be both distinct and perfect”〔T1912 0346a02〕.

The benefits passage strictly limits the relevant stages to the Distinct and Perfect. Zhanran says, 「明出假利益者。欲明出假真實利益。必在別圓初地初住」 tr. “In explaining the benefits of emerging into the provisional, the intent is to clarify its true benefits, which necessarily lie at the first ground of the Distinct or first abode of the Perfect”〔T1912 0346a12〕. He judges the Tripiṭaka and Shared teachings 「非真起應」 tr. “not truly arising in response”〔T1912 0346a20〕, and then uses the Distinct Teaching at and above entry into the grounds to explain true response properly〔T1912 0346a28〕. This does not erase the limited benefits described by the treatise for the Tripiṭaka and Shared teachings; it distinguishes the stage-meaning of “truly arising in response.”

The conclusion of pervasiveness first distinguishes textual sequence from the intent of practice. Zhanran explains that nonsequentiality does not obstruct establishing sequential stages: 「不次第假雖即從初不次第破。復約不次而論次位」 tr. “Although nonsequential provisionality breaks nonsequentially from the outset, sequential stages are again discussed in terms of the nonsequential”〔T1912 0347b13〕. He also interprets ignorance obstructing superknowledge as delusion that obstructs the superknowledges of the inconceivable path of transformation〔T1912 0347b18〕. The final sentence, 「向之重沓不出一心」 tr. “The foregoing repetitions do not go beyond one mind”〔T1912 0347b27〕, gathers the elaborate illnesses, medicines, and stages without canceling their discriminative function.

5. Explanations of Various Masters

This unit has a directly corresponding Song-dynasty exchange in the Siming lineage. In T1937, the Record of Teachings and Practices of Venerable Siming, the section title is 「教門雜問答七章」 tr. “Seven Chapters of Miscellaneous Questions and Answers on the Teaching Gate”〔T1937 0882c18〕, and the statement of responsibility reads 「四明法師問 門人〔自仁〕答」 tr. “Questions by Dharma Master Siming; answers by the disciple 〔Ziren〕”〔T1937 0882c19〕. The seventh question directly addresses the defining marks of this unit:

「七問。止觀破法遍中。先約四句破見思假。次約藥病破塵沙惑。後約真緣破無明惑。次第如此。如何謂之一心三觀破法遍耶」 tr. “Seventh question: Within pervasive breaking through Dharmas in the Mohe Zhiguan, it first uses four alternatives to break the provisionality of views and thought, next uses medicine and illness to break delusions innumerable as dust and sand, and afterward uses true conditions to break the delusion of ignorance. Since the sequence is like this, how can it be called the three contemplations in one mind pervasively breaking through Dharmas?”〔T1937 0884a02〕

The answer first says, 「言不頓舒。文似次第。文雖次第。意實圓融」 tr. “Words cannot be unfolded all at once, so the text appears sequential. Although the text is sequential, its intent is truly perfectly interfused”〔T1937 0884a05〕. It then distinguishes 「文似次第者。為對破三惑故。先空次假後中」 tr. “The text appears sequential because it correspondingly breaks the three delusions: first emptiness, next the provisional, and afterward the Middle”〔T1937 0884a06〕 from 「意實圓融者。良由行人修之。乃舉一即三。非前非後」 tr. “Its intent is truly perfectly interfused because, when practitioners cultivate it, raising one is itself all three, neither before nor after”〔T1937 0884a07〕. This is the Song reception’s judgment of sequential text and perfectly interfused intent; it is not back-projected as a sentence by Zhiyi.

The Siming Shiyi Shu, T1936, has six neighboring passages, all listed here:

No.Verbatim witnessRelation
1「乃用十乘法藥。委細治之」 tr. “Then use the Dharma medicine of the ten vehicles to treat it in meticulous detail”〔T1936 0834c08〕Dharma medicine of the ten vehicles in general
2「還曾於此境觀。分藥病否」 tr. “Within this object and contemplation, have you ever distinguished medicine from illness?”〔T1936 0834c11〕Medicine and illness in object and contemplation generally
3「亦由上人素不諳境觀藥病」 tr. “This is also because the venerable has never been versed in medicine and illness within object and contemplation”〔T1936 0835c02〕Medicine and illness in object and contemplation generally
4「用藥治病之義故也」 tr. “This is because of the meaning of using medicine to treat illness”〔T1936 0835c22〕Active contemplation, contemplated object, medicine, and illness generally
5「如破法遍之後。例餘陰界入修圓破遍」 tr. “As after pervasive breaking through Dharmas, it analogically extends to the remaining aggregates, sense fields, and elements for cultivating perfect pervasive breaking”〔T1936 0838a07〕The analogy to the remaining aggregates, sense fields, and elements at the end of the entire rubric of pervasive breaking
6「破遍文末例餘陰入。尚恐太早」 tr. “At the end of the passage on pervasive breaking it analogically extends to the remaining aggregates and sense fields; even that may be too early”〔T1936 0840a09〕Also concerns the analogy at the end of pervasive breaking

The first four passages concern medicine and illness in object and contemplation generally; the last two concern the analogy to the remaining aggregates, sense fields, and elements at the end of the entire rubric. None of the six simultaneously possesses all three defining marks of emerging from emptiness into the provisional, medicine and illness, and breaking delusions innumerable as dust and sand. They are therefore noted only as neighboring reception, and no corpus-wide negative proposition is built from the limited matches. The disputes between the Shanjia and Shanwai lineages are likewise noted where encountered without adjudicating right and wrong.

6. Terminology

TermUsage in the treatiseReading in the Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan
Emerging from emptiness into the provisional「從空入假,破他縛著,不同二乘」 tr. “Emerging from emptiness into the provisional breaks others’ bondage and attachment and differs from the Two Vehicles”〔T1911 0075c05〕Bodhisattvas realize emptiness without abiding in it and can distinguish medicine and illness within emptiness〔T1912 0339b29〕; this is not a return to substantial existence
Five conditionsA weighty mind of compassion, recollection of the original vow, keen and sharp wisdom, skillful means, and the power of great diligence〔T1911 0075c11–27〕Kinship, compact, strength, strategy, and courage reveal their completeness; four of these are the four conditions other than sharp wisdom
Grief of the same body「同體哀傷倍復隆重」 tr. “Grief of the same body becomes doubly grave”〔T1911 0075c13〕Seeing the suffering of beings as one’s own suffering, not interpreting it as an unconditioned identity of substance〔T1912 0339c08〕
Knowing illness, recognizing medicine, administering medicineKnowing the illness of views and thought, recognizing three kinds of Dharma medicine, and administering the medicines of path and cessation according to the illnesses of suffering and originationNot one of the three may be lacking〔T1912 0340b20〕; together they constitute contemplation in entering the provisional
Dharma eye; wisdom of the varieties of the path「得法眼見,道種智知,分別思假病相分明」 tr. “One sees with the Dharma eye and knows with wisdom of the varieties of the path, clearly distinguishing the illness-marks of the provisionality of thought”〔T1911 0077a15〕Each Dharma is investigated throughout by calming-and-contemplation to assist its arising〔T1912 0341b05〕
Three kinds of Dharma medicineWorldly, supramundane, and supramundane supreme〔T1911 0077a19–21〕All belong to emerging from emptiness into the provisional and pervasively knowing differentiated Dharmas; the supreme medicines retain the same names while their meanings return to the Perfect and Distinct
Great physician「欲治一病,一藥即足;欲為大醫,遍須諸藥」 tr. “To treat one illness, one medicine is sufficient; to become a great physician, every medicine is required”〔T1911 0078a26〕Judged according to the Distinct Teaching as the stage of the ten practices emerging into the provisional〔T1912 0343a16〕
Administering medicine to four facultiesLower, middling, higher, and supreme〔T1911 0078c10–0079a05〕The names are established by viewing the four teachings in relation to one another〔T1912 0344a01〕
Truly arising in response「從真起應,法眼稱機」 tr. “Arising in response from the true, the Dharma eye accords with faculties”〔T1911 0079c26〕Strictly judged as occurring at or above the first ground of the Distinct Teaching and first abode of the Perfect Teaching〔T1912 0346a12〕
Ignorance obstructing superknowledge「障通無知既破,雙照二諦」 tr. “Once ignorance obstructing superknowledge is broken, one illuminates both truths together”〔T1911 0080b12〕Zhanran interprets it as delusion obstructing the superknowledges of the inconceivable path of transformation〔T1912 0347b18〕
Pervasive breaking through DharmasIf distinguishing illness, medicine, and administration of medicine fails to reach anywhere, it is not called pervasive; only nonsequential breaking is called pervasiveThe text can still discuss sequential stages, while the intent of practice does not separate the three contemplations into before and after〔T1912 0347b13〕

7. Similes · Cross-Reading · Carrying Forward

Emerging from emptiness into the provisional first uses two nearly impossible actions to reveal skillful means: planting a tree in empty space so that branches, leaves, flowers, and fruit mature; and shooting arrows successively into the air so that each later arrow supports the earlier one and prevents it from falling. Neither simile says that the bodhisattva abandons emptiness. They say that wisdom does not fall into one-sided emptiness while skillful means can still accomplish benefit for others.

The five conditions then become kinship, compact, strategy, strength, and courage, and four kinds of warriors distinguish intellectual faculties from bravery: one may be physically weak yet courageous, physically strong and courageous, strong yet timid, or lacking both strength and courage. Entering the provisional is not determined only by acuity or dullness. Whether great compassion, the original vow, skillful means, and diligence are complete determines whether one can emerge from one-sided emptiness.

Knowing illness, recognizing medicine, and administering medicine organize the whole passage as the discipline of the great physician. The illnesses of views and thought have roots, conditions, duration, and grades; Dharma medicines are worldly, supramundane, and supramundane supreme; administration then differs for lower, middling, higher, and supreme faculties. Shennong’s original prescriptions and the prescriptions newly established by Hua Tuo and Bian Que according to the times show that scriptural Dharmas do not become dead formulas. North and south, strong and weak people, thick and thin food and medicine, and light and grave illnesses all require examination of faculties and differentiated dosage.

The bark, flesh, sap, fruit, roots, stems, branches, and leaves of medicinal substances; what comes from mountains, seas, water, land, and the four directions; and differences in harvesting, dryness or moisture, and season bring “pervasive knowing” down to concrete distinctions. One concentration of quiescence can unfold immeasurable calming practices, and one great wisdom can unfold immeasurable contemplations, just as the water of a great river is apportioned into sheng and ge without excessive or deficient dosage. Finally, rain from one cloud universally falls and plants and trees each gain growth: one Dharma rain does not erase the faculties of those who receive it.

The stages passage uses the mountain of seven treasures to show hearing of the superior yet retreating, and the wingless great bird to show cultivation of emptiness alone without complete skillful means. The Perfect Teaching’s entering and emerging within one mind while also encompassing distinct entering and emerging shows that nonsequentiality is not the absence of differentiated function. The benefits passage then makes response-body, teaching Dharma, and administering medicine one event: miraculous transformation of form is not by itself proof of the true; one must see whether it accords with faculties and benefits beings from the ground of the Dharma body.

The conclusion of pervasiveness again uses the blind person asking about milk, touching the elephant and obtaining rope or pestle, and delirious speech during illness to reveal partial views. The two preceding subunits have already broken views and thought in detail; this unit turns to pervasive knowledge of illness-Dharmas, medicine-Dharmas, and administration-of-medicine Dharmas. Its final sentence returns textual sequence to the intent of practice: only the nonsequential is sufficient to be called pervasive.

The Zhiguan Yili, T1913, carries forward textual sequence and pervasive embodiment through 「文偏意圓」 tr. “the text is partial while the intent is perfect”〔T1913 0448a02〕, 「文雖次第行必隨人」 tr. “although the text is sequential, practice necessarily follows the person”〔T1913 0448a11〕, and 「竪破元為顯於不二」 tr. “vertical breaking is fundamentally for revealing nonduality”〔T1913 0448a12〕. It further says, 「四入住應遍方名假遍。及以真遍」 tr. “Only when the four—entering, abiding, and responding〔and the fourth〕—are pervasive is provisional pervasiveness, together with true pervasiveness, so named”〔T1913 0451a01〕; this serves only as Zhanran’s outline. The Zhiguan Dayi, T1914, gathers the mutual entry of the four gates through 「於無生門遍破諸惑。復以無生度入餘門」 tr. “Within the gate of nonarising, pervasively break all delusions; then use nonarising to pass into the remaining gates”〔T1914 0460c18〕 and 「縱橫俱破令識體遍」 tr. “Breaking both vertically and horizontally enables recognition of embodied pervasiveness”〔T1914 0460c19〕; it too does not replace the treatise’s detailed rubric.

8. Placement of the Editions

This edition takes Taishō T1911 as its single base text. At a page break in the main text, the page anchor is placed at the beginning of the first paragraph or verse line on that page, using the nearest Taishō line marker before its first graph. Variant readings list only the graph adopted in the main text and the original graph in the collated witness, without judging superiority. This unit has twenty-five critical notes. In the table, Daben is the Taishō base, Jiaben is the Tokugawa printed copy formerly held by Shimaji Daitō and others, “electronic” is the electronic Buddhist-canon correction, Hongwu and Northern Canon are the corresponding collated witnesses, and absence is recorded as none.

No.Line anchorMain-text sideCollated-witness side
10075c23「辦」 tr. “the graph ban, ‘accomplish’”〔T1911 0075c23〕[Daben]「辨」 tr. “the graph bian, ‘distinguish’”〔T1911 0075c23〕[Jiaben]
20076b04「貧」 tr. “poor”〔T1911 0076b04〕[Daben]「資」 tr. “resources”〔T1911 0076b04〕[Jiaben]
30076b10「異」 tr. “different”〔T1911 0076b10〕[Daben]「亦異」 tr. “also different”〔T1911 0076b10〕[Jiaben]
40076b25「單」 tr. “single”〔T1911 0076b25〕[Daben]「此就單」 tr. “this concerns the single”〔T1911 0076b25〕[Jiaben]
50076c25「十」 tr. “ten”〔T1911 0076c25〕[Daben]「三十」 tr. “thirty”〔T1911 0076c25〕[Jiaben]
60077a03「十」 tr. “ten”〔T1911 0077a03〕[Daben]「一十」 tr. “ten”〔T1911 0077a03〕[Jiaben]
70077a04「二」 tr. “two”〔T1911 0077a04〕[Daben]「三」 tr. “three”〔T1911 0077a04〕[Jiaben]
80077a16「明」 tr. “clear”〔T1911 0077a16〕[Daben]「別」 tr. “distinguish”〔T1911 0077a16〕[Jiaben]
90077a20「間」 tr. “among”〔T1911 0077a20〕[Daben]「聞」 tr. “hear”〔T1911 0077a20〕[Jiaben]
100077a21「三」 tr. “three”〔T1911 0077a21〕[Daben]「一三」 tr. “one, three”〔T1911 0077a21〕[Jiaben]
110077a22「無」 tr. “without”〔T1911 0077a22〕[Daben]「四無」 tr. “four without”〔T1911 0077a22〕[Jiaben]
120077a24「惠」 tr. “benefit”〔T1911 0077a24〕[Daben]「意」 tr. “meaning”〔T1911 0077a24〕[Jiaben]. The former yields the sense “what benefit,” the latter “what meaning”; both readings work. This edition retains the base-text reading “benefit,” and the vernacular renders it “what benefit is there?”
130077a27「施」 tr. “give”〔T1911 0077a27〕[Daben]「世」 tr. “world”〔T1911 0077a27〕[Jiaben]
140078b06「集」 tr. “origination”〔T1911 0078b06〕[Daben]「苦集」 tr. “suffering and origination”〔T1911 0078b06〕[Jiaben]
150078b10「上」 tr. “above”〔T1911 0078b10〕[Daben]「之上」 tr. “above it”〔T1911 0078b10〕[Jiaben]
160078b13「下」 tr. “below”〔T1911 0078b13〕[Daben]「之下」 tr. “below it”〔T1911 0078b13〕[Jiaben]
170078c02「旦」 tr. “dawn”〔T1911 0078c02〕[Daben]「且」 tr. “for the moment”〔T1911 0078c02〕[Jiaben]
180078c15「下根病也」 tr. “this is the illness of lower faculties”〔T1911 0078c15〕[Daben]None [Jiaben]
190078c18「說」 tr. “teaching”〔T1911 0078c18〕[electronic][Hongwu][Northern Canon]「論」 tr. “treatise”〔T1911 0078c18〕[Daben]; 「說」 tr. “teaching”〔T1911 0078c18〕[Jiaben]
200078c20「說」 tr. “teach”〔T1911 0078c20〕[Daben]「說者」 tr. “the one who teaches”〔T1911 0078c20〕[Jiaben]
210079a11「先」 tr. “first”〔T1911 0079a11〕[Daben]「明」 tr. “clarify”〔T1911 0079a11〕[Jiaben]
220079a22「斷」 tr. “sever”〔T1911 0079a22〕[Daben]「繼」 tr. “continue”〔T1911 0079a22〕[Jiaben]
230079a22「祇」 tr. “only”〔T1911 0079a22〕[Daben]「秪」 tr. “only”〔T1911 0079a22〕[Jiaben]
240079b15「于」 tr. “in”〔T1911 0079b15〕[Daben]「千」 tr. “thousand”〔T1911 0079b15〕[Jiaben]
250080b13「而言」 tr. “and yet say”〔T1911 0080b13〕[Daben]「言之」 tr. “say it”〔T1911 0080b13〕[Jiaben]

The fascicle title also preserves two transmitted interlinear notes: 〔first〕 for the first half of fascicle six and 〔second〕 for its second half. These are fascicle markers rather than additional main-text variants.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing — with AI-assisted consistency checking

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0