摩訶止觀 識通塞·道品調適
煩惱是塞,這容易看見;用智慧破煩惱,是通,也容易理解。真正危險的是:當你愛著那份能破的智慧,通就在手中翻成了塞。觀仍叫觀,卻開始保護一個『我在觀』的自己;能破也就和所破站到同一邊。
所以識通塞不是逢法便破。它像除去眼膜而養護明珠,像破除賊眾而保全良將:該破的破,該養的養,連能破之心也不放過。只會說空、假、中,可能像蟲蛀木頭偶成字形;真正識字,是在每一念、每一能觀、每一所觀中,都看見它何時通、何時塞。
五百由旬也不是一條可以硬配的直線。它同時是所歷的生死處所、所斷的五重煩惱、能照的空假中三觀。只拿一孔之匙,開不了三齒之鎖。路要從三面同時辨,還要把橫向的諦、緣、度織進竪向的空、假、中,初心的每一步才真正可查。
最後,一心三觀使山河石壁都如虛空,不必離低攀高、避山走谷。但連『無通無塞』也不能抓住;一抓,它又成為新塞。無通無塞不是什麼都不管,而是有塞便破、有通便護,卻不把破與護據為所得。
知道路,還要調步伐。三十七品像釀酒,也像種樹:暖度、麴糵失宜,水不能成酒;種子、芽、根、莖葉、花、果各失時節,道樹不能結果。心浮便以除、捨、定調低,心沉便以精進、擇法、喜振起,念通持兩邊。調適不是再添一法,只是讓已有的法在此刻恰好相生。
無漏城有空、無相、無作三門;由定入、由慧入,都能發真。一門又可具三門,三門也歸一門。真正的大導師不只知道終點在哪裡,而是能在通處不著通、塞處不困塞,讓腳下這一步,已經向著寶所。
Affliction is obstruction; that is easy to see. Breaking affliction with wisdom is passage; that is easy to understand. The real danger comes when you cherish the wisdom that actively breaks: passage turns into obstruction in your very hands. Contemplation is still called contemplation, but it begins protecting a self who says, “I am contemplating.” What actively breaks then takes the same side as what it breaks.
Discerning passage and obstruction therefore does not mean breaking every Dharma one meets. It resembles removing a film from the eye while nurturing its bright jewel, or defeating a band of thieves while preserving a good general: break what should be broken, nurture what should be nurtured, and do not exempt even the mind that actively breaks. Merely saying emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle may resemble insects boring into wood and accidentally forming written words. Truly knowing the words means seeing, within every thought, everything that contemplates, and everything contemplated, when passage appears and when obstruction appears.
Nor are the five hundred yojanas a straight line onto which one can force a rigid correlation. They are simultaneously the places of birth-and-death traversed, the five levels of affliction severed, and the three contemplations of emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle that illuminate. A key with one notch cannot open a lock with three teeth. The road must be discerned from all three sides, and the horizontal truths, dependent origination, and perfections must be woven into the vertical emptiness, provisionality, and Middle, so that every step of a beginner can truly be inspected.
In the end, three contemplations in one mind make mountains, rivers, and stone walls all like empty space; one need neither leave low ground to climb high nor avoid mountains to follow valleys. Yet even “neither passage nor obstruction” cannot be grasped. The moment it is grasped, it becomes a new obstruction. Neither passage nor obstruction does not mean neglecting everything. It means breaking obstruction when it appears and protecting passage when it appears, without appropriating breaking or protecting as an attainment.
Knowing the route is not enough; the pace must also be regulated. The thirty-seven factors resemble brewing wine and growing a tree. If warmth, yeast, and malt are out of balance, water cannot become wine. If seed, sprout, root, stems and leaves, flowers, and fruit each miss their season, the tree of the path cannot bear fruit. When mind floats, tranquility, equanimity, and concentration settle it. When mind sinks, diligence, investigation of Dharmas, and joy arouse it. Mindfulness holds both sides. Regulation does not add another Dharma; it lets the Dharmas already present mutually arise in just the right way now.
The uncontaminated city has three gates: emptiness, signlessness, and nonaction. Whether one enters through meditative concentration or wisdom, true wisdom can arise. One gate can also possess all three, and all three return to one. A true great guide does not merely know where the destination lies. Without clinging to passage where the way is open or being trapped by obstruction where it is blocked, the guide makes this very step already face the place of jewels.
隋天台智者大師說・門人灌頂記《摩訶止觀》· 大正藏 T46n1911〔起 T46 0086a13〕。段/行首〔T46 …〕=大正藏頁·欄·行錨(換頁一枚)。
〔T46 0086a13〕摩訶止觀卷第七〔上〕 隋天台智者大師說 門人灌頂記 第五、識通塞者,亦名「知得失」,亦名「知字非字」。如上破法遍應通入無生;若不入者,當尋得失,必滯是非,不得一向作解。何者?若同外道,愛著觀空智慧,宜以四句遍破,能破如所破,令眾塞得通。若不執觀空智慧,則能破不如所破,但破塞、存通。如除膜養珠,破賊護將。若爾,即大導師善知通塞,將導眾人能過五百由旬。 舊云:「六地見思盡為三百,七地、八地為四百,九地、十地為五百」。此義與《釋論》乖,論以二乘為四百;二乘之道非七地、八地。《攝大乘》人以三界為三百,方便、因緣兩生死足為五百。則攝義不盡,更有有後生死、無後生死,屬何百耶?地人以十信、住、行、向、地為五百。此與《法華》乖。《法華》過三百由旬作化城,此則二百由旬作化城。復有人解三界為三百,二乘足為五百。此義三失:一、出三界外立化城,云何二乘出三界外不入城,更行四百、五百?四百、五百之外更無化城,何所可入而稱二乘?二者滅化城方可得進,城猶未滅,而輒進四百、五百?三者二乘共入化城,云何聲聞為四百,支佛為五百?有人以五住煩惱為五百。然二乘已斷四住,應是四百由旬外立化城。有人以斷三界思為三百,塵沙為四百,無明為五百。此亦不然,由旬本譬煩惱,云何見多而不數,思少為三百? 此之名義,本出《法華》。《法華》舉五百為譬,本以生死險道,導師觀知合之,應作三番明五百,乃會經耳:一就生死處所,二就煩惱,三就智慧。諸師之釋,方圓動息,不與文會,如持一孔之匙開三須之鑰。初家約通位就四百立化城;攝家約生死割二種於荒外;地家約別位在界內立化城;次家徑侹不待開權即自顯實。 人師過如此,《釋論》意云何?論有二文,初以二乘為四百而止,不作五百;後文以二乘為一百。今通之,論明通意,通家以真諦為極,過三界已,未破化城,但入涅槃,即指涅槃為四百耳。而復以二乘為一百者,更明出假菩薩從空出假,非涅槃為一百,入三界為三百。作如此消文,於經論無妨也。 今明五百由旬者,一、約生死處所,謂三界果報為三百,方便有餘土、實報無礙土是為五百由旬處所;次、約煩惱者,所謂見諦惑為一百,五下分為二百,五上分為三百,塵沙為四百,無明為五百;次、約觀智者,空觀智知三百,假觀智知四百,中觀智知五百。此與文會,無前諸師過也。 又諸師判位遼遠,初心行人尚未斷見,何由超過五百由旬乎?今論由旬,有橫通塞、有竪通塞。橫者具約三法:苦集為塞,道滅為通;無明十二因緣為塞,無明滅為通;六蔽覆心為塞,六度為通。竪通塞者:見思分段生死為塞,從假入空觀為通;無知方便生死為塞,從空入假觀為通;無明因緣生死等為塞,中道正觀為通。 今當以橫織竪檢校通塞。如從假入空破諸見思,單、複、具足、無言等見,九九八十一思。如斯諸惑本是污穢,增長煩惱遮塞行人,那忽取著謂是謂非?起諸結業漏落生死,唯見苦集不見道滅。既不識見思中四諦,是事不知,名為「無明」,乃至老死。但構因緣,無明不滅。不滅故,堅著叵捨,唯在此岸,不到彼岸。《大經》云:「童子飢時取糞中果,智人呵之,赧然有愧。」失於淨法,是名為「塞」。若於諸見,介爾起心,知無性實、無常、無主;倒破則無業,無業則無果,是名為「道」,道故有滅。若識四諦,則無無明,亦無老死。因緣壞故,則捨諸有到於彼岸。當用此意歷一一心、歷一一能、歷一一所。若起三塞,破之令通;若是三通,養令成就。 復次,體見即空,能體亦即空。如羅漢之心尚名「無漏五陰」,我觀未真,那得非陰?若計陰實,則結業生死。若不識陰四諦,即是無明。若愛觀空智慧,則不能捨;用即空意歷一一心、歷一一能、歷一一所。若有三塞,破之令通;若是三通,養令成就。則巧過見思之塞,善通三百由旬也。 〔T46 0087a06〕次、用橫織竪檢校從空入假觀通塞者,此則易解。於病法、藥法、授藥法,於一一法、一一能、一一所,明識諦、緣、度。若起三塞,破之令通;若有三通,養令成就。則過無知之塞,通四百由旬。 次、用橫織竪檢校中道正觀者:於無明、法性、真緣等,一一法、一一能、一一所,明識諦、緣、度。若起三塞,破之令通;若有三通,養令成就。則過無明之塞,通五百由旬。 若作如此論通塞者,次第竪論六地、初地,動經劫數塞乃得通。《大經》云:「須陀洹者八萬劫到,乃至支佛十千劫到。」到菩薩初發心住。此論聖位,何益初心行人者乎? 復次,約橫別論通塞者,如《大品經》云「有菩薩從初發心即與薩婆若相應」者,與空相應也。若初未相應,當用諦、緣、度檢一一心。若有三塞,破之令通;若有三通,養令成就,得過三百由旬。又云:「有菩薩從初發心即能遊戲神通、淨佛國土。」此是出假之意。若初發心修假,亦用諦、緣、度檢一一心,破塞養通,過四百由旬。又云:「有菩薩從初發心即能坐道場成正覺。」此即中意。若初發心修中,亦用諦、緣、度檢一一心,破塞養通,過五百由旬也。 如此說者,雖初心得論通塞,而三法各別。《大論》引三喻,一則步涉,二則乘馬,三則神通。步、馬兩行,須知通塞;神通無礙,塞不能遮。山壁皆虛,何通可擇?初觀喻步,次觀喻馬,後觀喻飛。三義分張,亦非今所用也。若竪論三觀,兩觀當地為通,望上為塞;若後一觀勝下為通,隔小為塞。橫論三觀,當分為通,不相收為塞。法相淺深任有通塞,況復於中起苦、集、無明、蔽等?是故皆塞,無復有通。 若一心三觀法相,即破竪中之通塞;三觀一心破橫中之通塞。空即三觀,故破步涉山壁,三百之通塞;假即三觀,破乘馬四百之通塞;中即三觀,破神通之通塞。良以一心能即空、假、中者,一切山河石壁、眾魔群道皆如虛空。一心三觀遊之無礙,終不去下陵高,避山從谷。觸處諸塞皆通無礙,能過五百由旬到於寶所。是名為「通」。通本對塞,既觸處如空,則無復有塞;無塞則無通。 若於無塞、無通起苦、集、無明、障蔽者,非但失於神通,亦失馬、步。能破如所破,字為非字,如彼蟲道偶得三觀之名,是蟲不知是字非字。若於一一法、一一能、一一所,皆即空、即假、即中,具諦緣度,是名無通、無塞,雙照通塞。是為智者識字非字;亦名良醫知得、知失。於無生門明識通塞者,於餘法門亦如是。是為初心過五百由旬,應明六即義〔云云〕。 問:通塞、得失、字非字,為一、為異? 答:此是一意,種種說耳,亦有差別。通塞約解,得失約行,字非字約教。《金光明》云:「正聞、正聽、正分別、正解於緣、正能覺了。」知字非字是正聞、正聽;知得失是正分別、正解於緣;知通塞是正能覺了。雖此差別,同顯一致耳。 問:橫塞塞竪通不?竪塞塞橫通不?橫通通竪塞不?竪通通橫塞不? 答:一往然,二往不然。然者,無明即見思,何意非橫障?中智治一切,何不通橫塞?此是一往然義耳。若二往釋者,橫塞障近,不能塞竪通;橫通力弱,不能通竪塞;竪塞深遠,不作橫障;竪通對當別,不通於橫塞耳。 ○第六、明道品調適者,道品有四:一、當分,二、相攝,三、約位,四、相生。 一、明當分者:未必具品方能得道。三四二五,單七隻八,當分是道,故云「當依念處得道」。又云「是道場」;又云「是摩訶衍」。念處既爾,餘品亦然。是為當分道品而非調停也。 二、明相攝者:如念處一法皆攝諸品。引《釋論》文云:「念處既攝餘品,餘品亦攝念處。」是為相攝道品,亦非調停也。 三、約位者:如念處當其位,正勤是煖位,如意足是頂位,五根是忍位,五力是世第一位,八正是見諦位,七覺是修道位。此是約位,亦非調停也。 四、相生者:如修念處能生正勤,正勤發如意足,如意足生五根,五根生五力,五力生七覺,七覺入八正道,是為善巧調適。戒、定、慧等,皆名為正。「清淨心常一,則能見般若。」是為相生,亦是調適。 所以須此者,上來雖破法遍、識通塞,若不調停道品,何能疾與真法相應?真法名無漏,道品是有漏,有漏能作無漏方便。方便失所,真理難會。如釀酒法,酵煖得宜,變水成酒;麴糵失度,味則不成。《大論》云:「三十七品是行道法;涅槃城有三門。」三門是近因,道品是遠因。為是義故,應須道品調停也。 〔T46 0088a02〕問:道品是二乘法,云何是菩薩道耶? 答:《大論》呵此問:「誰作是語?三藏、摩訶衍皆不作是說,那得獨云是小乘法?」《淨名》云:「道品善知識,由是成正覺;道品是道場,亦是摩訶衍。」《涅槃》云:「能修八正道者,即見佛性,名得醍醐。」《大集》云:「三十七品是菩薩寶炬陀羅尼。」如此等經皆明道品,何時獨是小乘?若《大經》云「三十七品是涅槃因,非大涅槃因;無量阿僧祇助菩提法是大涅槃因」者,道品之外無別有道品,如四諦外無第五諦。一種苦集如爪上土,分別苦集有無量相,如十方土。直明一三十七品是涅槃因,復有無量三十七助道品名大涅槃因。云何無量?有四種道諦故,有十六門故。 又有漏道品:欲界二十二、未到三十六、初禪三十七,皆有漏道品,如乳;三藏道品如酪;通教道品如生酥;別教如熟酥;圓教如醍醐。《大經》之文義合於此,非道品外別有助法也。或言三十七品是助道;或言是正道。《大論》云:「是菩薩道。」此文似正也。《淨名》云:「道品善知識,由是成正覺。」此文似助也。 又若言三十七品是有漏者,云何言七覺是修道? 《法華》云:「無漏根、力、覺、道之財。」 云何八正在七覺前? 此應三句分別:一、三十七品皆有漏,二、皆是無漏,三、亦有漏亦無漏。 如《大論》云:「修八正道得初善有漏五陰。」善有漏五陰即是煖法,煖法之前尚得修於八正道。云何修邪?初從師受法,繫心憶念名「念處」;為求此法,勤而行之名「正勤」;一心中修名「如意足」;五善根生名「根」;根增長名「力」;分別道用名「七覺」;安隱道中行名「八正道」。能如是修,得善有漏五陰。當知道品皆是有漏。 皆是無漏者,即是見諦思惟所行道品,一向是無漏。《法華》之文意在此也。從來雖言有漏中得修八正、七覺等,未有文證。 而《毘婆沙》云:「若八正在七覺後,亦得是有漏,亦得是無漏。」何以故?依八正入見諦,即是亦無漏;「若八正在七覺前,一向是無漏。」此則可解。引《婆沙》文證成二意。又亦漏無漏即是對位意也。 諸道諦三十七品今不具記,但明無作道諦三十七品,成於一心三觀義也。 《大品》云:「欲以一切種修四念處者,念處是法界,攝一切法;一切法趣念處,是趣不過。」《華嚴》云:「譬如大地一,能生種種芽。」地是諸芽種也。《法華》云:「一切種相、體、性,皆是一種相、體、性。何謂一種?即佛種相、體、性也。」常途云:「《法華》不明佛性,經明一種,是何一種?」卉木叢林種種,喻七方便;大地一種,即一實事,名「佛種」也。 今一念心起不思議,即一切種,十界陰入不相妨礙。若觀法性因緣生故,一種一切種,則一色一切色。若法性空故,一切色一色,則一空一切空。法性假故,一色一切色,一假一切假。法性中故,非一非一切,雙照一、一切,亦名非空非假雙照空假,則一切非空非假雙照空假。九法界色即空、即假、即中,亦復如是。是名「身念處」。 若觀法性受,法性因緣生故,一種一切種,一受一切受。法性受空故,一切受一受,一空一切空。法性受假名故,一受一切受,一假一切假。法性受中故,非一受非一切受,非空非假雙照空假,則一切非空非假雙照空假。九法界受即空、即假、即中,亦復如是。是名「受念處」。 若觀法性心因緣生法,一種一切種,一心一切心。法性空故,一切心一心,一空一切空。法性假故,一心一切心,一假一切假。法性中故,非一非一切,非空非假雙照空假。九法界心亦復如是。是名「心念處」。 若觀法性想、行兩陰因緣生法,一種一切種,一行無量行。法性空故,一切行一行,一空一切空。法性假故,一行一切行,一假一切假。法性中故,非一非一切,非空非假雙照空假,一切非空非假雙照空假。九法界行皆即空、即假、即中,亦復如是。是名「法念處」。 如是念處力用廣博,義兼大小,俱破八倒,雙顯榮枯,雙非榮枯,即於中間入般涅槃,亦名「坐道場」,亦名「摩訶衍」,亦名「法界」。 兼廣之義,其相云何? 法性之色實非是淨,而凡夫橫計為淨,是名顛倒;實非不淨,二乘之人橫計不淨,是名顛倒。今觀色種即空,一切即空,空中無淨,云何染著?是名「凡夫計淨倒破,枯念處成」。色種即假,一切皆假,分別名相不可窮盡;假智常淨,不為無知塵惑所染,云何滯空而取灰滅,言色不淨?是名二乘不淨倒破,榮念處成。是名八倒俱破,枯榮雙立。觀色本際非空非假,則一切非空非假。非空故非不淨倒;非假故非淨倒。非淨倒故則非榮樹;非不淨倒故則非枯樹。非枯非榮則非二邊;無邊無中乃名「中間」。佛會此理故名「涅槃」,亦是非淨非不淨。八倒不生名為「涅槃」,如是涅槃名「祕密藏」。安置諸子祕密藏中,佛自住中,故言「入」也。 〔T46 0089a05〕法性之受本非是樂,而凡夫之人橫計為樂,是名顛倒。實非是苦,二乘之人橫計為苦。今觀受種即空,一切皆空;空中無樂,云何生染?則凡夫倒破,枯念處成。受種即假,一切皆假,以無所受而受諸受;名聞分別不生厭畏,云何棄之沈空灰斷?二乘倒破,榮念處成。是名「二倒雙破,枯榮雙立」。觀受本際即非空非假;非空故非枯,非假故非榮。邊倒不生名為「涅槃」;中間理顯名「祕密藏」,皆如上說〔云云〕。 法性之心本非是常,凡夫橫計,是名「常倒」;法性實非無常,二乘橫計無常。今觀心種即空,一切即空;空中非常,云何謂心念念相續?是名凡夫常倒破,枯念處成。心即假名,一切悉假;心若無常,那得分別無量心相?是名「二乘無常倒破,榮念處成」。又心即非空非假,非空故非無常,非假故非於常。非榮非枯邊倒不生名「入涅槃」;中道理顯名「祕密藏」。安置諸子,自亦入中〔云云〕。 法性之法本非有我,凡夫之人橫計有我。本非無我,二乘之人橫計無我。今觀法性即空,一切皆空;空中無我,是名「凡夫倒破,枯念處成」。法性即假,一切皆假施設,自在不滯,我義具足,是名「二乘倒破,榮念處成」。觀法本際即非空非假。非空故非無我;非假故非於我。邊倒不生名「入涅槃」;中間理顯名「祕密藏」。 治倒法藥其數有四;法性觀智名之為「念」;一諦三諦名之為「處」。一切即空,諸倒榮枯無不空寂;一切即假,二邊雙樹無不成立;一切即中,無非法界。祇一念心,廣遠若此。若能深觀念處,是坐道場,是摩訶衍,是雙樹間入般涅槃;始終具足,不須更修餘法。若不入者,更研餘品。 勤觀念處,名「正勤」。見思本起,名「已生惡」;觀於即空,令已生不生,故勤精進。塵沙無明,名「未生惡」;觀即假、即中,令未生不生,故勤精進。竭力盡誠,行四三昧,遮此二惡。一切智名「已生善」;此善易生,故言「泥洹道易得」也。道種智、一切種智名「未生善」;此分別智難生。空智已生,勤加增長;中智未生,令得開發。三觀無間,祇為生此二智耳。是四正勤亦能悟道,故言「一心勤精進故得三菩提」,不須餘法。若不入者,當是不勤,心過散動;須入善寂,審觀心性,名為「上定」。於上定中修如意足:欲、精進、心、思惟。 欲者,專向彼法,亦名「莊嚴彼法」。定中觀智,如密室中燈,照物則了。以照了故,斷行成就修如意足。精進者,成就彼法。法性不動而寂然精進,無間無雜。斷行成就修如意足。心者,正住觀察彼法一心中緣。制之一處無事不辦,斷行成就修如意足。思惟者,善能分別彼法方便。如此思惟不令動散。定思惟故,斷行成就修如意足。能如此修,定心而入,不須餘法。若不入者,當修五根。 信三諦理是三世佛母,能生一切十力、無畏、解脫、三昧。但念處修,不求餘法,是名「信根」。進者,以信攝於諸法。信諸法故,倍策精進。念者,但念正助之道,不令邪妄得入。又此法者為精進所修,是法不忘,故名「念根」。定者,一心寂定而行精進。又此法為念所攝,是法不忘、不動,故名「定根」。慧者,念處之慧為定法所攝,內性自照不從他知,是名「慧根」。但修五根亦能入道成摩訶衍。若不入者,進修五力,令根增長,遮諸煩惱名之為「力」。 信破諸疑,無能動者。精進除懈怠,如本所願,皆得成就。念破邪想,不為煩惱所壞。定破散亂,遠離憒鬧。雖有所說,不礙初禪;善住覺觀,不礙二禪;心生歡喜,不礙三禪;教化眾生,不礙四禪。妨四禪法不妨諸定,亦不捨定,亦不隨定,是名「定力」。慧破邪執,一切執、一切慧雙照具足,是名「慧力」。如是五力名「摩訶衍」。若不入者,用七覺均調。 心浮動時,以除覺除身口之麁;以捨覺捨於觀智;以定心入禪。若心沈時,精進、擇、喜起之。念通緣兩處。修此七覺即得入道。《大論》云:「若離五蓋專修七覺,不得入者無有是處。」若不入者,修八正道。 更以出世上上正見觀三諦理,以正思惟發動此觀。如法相說自他俱益,即是正語。若黑業得黑報,白業得白報,雜業得雜報,非白非黑業得非白非黑報;約小乘作可解。今言沈空是黑業,出假是白業,兩兼是雜業,中道是非白非黑業,皆名「邪命」。若業能盡業,名為「正業」;依此而行,名為「正業」。正業不為二邊所牽。見他得利心不惱熱,而於己利常知止足,是為「正命」。善入正諦,名「正精進」。心不動失,正直不忘,名「正念」。正住決定,名「正定」。因是八正道,即得入理。《大經》云:「若有能修八正道者,即得醍醐。」 〔T46 0090a04〕如是道品非是對位,但於初心觀法性理,即得具足。《大論》云:「四念處中四種精進,名『四正勤』;四種定心,名『四如意足』;五善根生,名為『根』;根增長,名為『力』;分別四念處道用,名為『覺』;四念處安隱道中行,名『八正道』。」故知初心行道,用三十七品調養止觀四種三昧,入菩薩位。如此道品是大涅槃近因,餘諸道品名為遠因〔云云〕。 今以譬顯此義:植種於地,芽嘴初開,生根下向,枝葉上布,其花敷榮,結果成實。法性、法界為大地;念處觀為種子;四正勤如抽芽;五根如生根;五力如莖葉增長;七覺如開花;八正如結果。結果者,即是入銅輪位,證無生忍,亦名「至寶所」,亦名「入祕藏」,亦名「得醍醐」,亦名「見佛性」,亦名「法身顯,八相作佛」。「道品善知識,由是成正覺。」此之謂也。 若通途釋道樹者:如《大品》明離三惡道名「葉益」,得人天身名「花益」,得四道果名「果益」;此偏就空為釋耳。免二乘地為葉益,得變通身為花益,具道種智為果益;此偏就假為釋耳。免二邊縛為葉益,受法性身為花益,證入佛性為果益;此偏就中為釋耳。若總就三觀者,即空名「葉益」,即假名「花益」,即中名「果益」〔云云〕。 復次,行三十七道品將到無漏城。域有三門,若入此門,即得發真;謂空、無相、無作門,亦名「三解脫門」,亦名「三三昧」。若從正見、正思惟入定,從定發無漏,是時正見智名「大臣」,正定為「大王」;從此得名,名「三三昧」。「非智不禪」,即此意也。 若由正定生正見,從正見發無漏,是時正定為大臣,智慧為大王,從此得名,名「三解脫」。「非禪不智」,即此意也。或可三昧是伏道;解脫是斷道、證道。或可定、慧合故,三昧即解脫,解脫即三昧。 若三藏,以苦下空、無我是空門;滅下四行是無相門;集道下八行、苦下兩行是無作門。此十六行王臣等〔云云〕。 若通教,明苦集皆如幻化即空門。古《釋論》本云:「若觀極微色,則有十八空。」今本云:「若觀一端疊,則有十八空。」疊是假名,極微是實法,以此為異。若得意者,假、實皆空耳。若未入空,情想戲論,計有空相;知空無空相,名「無相門」。空相雖空,猶計觀智,既無能所,誰作空觀?是名「無作門」。既無作者,誰起願求?亦名「無願」。此三三昧王臣〔云云〕。 若別教,明從假入空證真諦,名「空三昧」。二乘但證此空,猶有空相;菩薩知空非空,出假化物,無復空相,是名「無相三昧」;進修中道無中邊相,亦不求中邊,名「無作三昧」。此三觀智王臣〔云云〕。 復次,別約出假意者:分別無量藥、病,悉是假名;假名無實,無實故空,是名「空門」。空尚無空相,況有假相?故名「無相門」。空、假無相,亦不願求知病識藥,故名「無願」。此出假智王臣〔云云〕。 別約圓者,名雖同前,意義大異。《大論》云:「聲聞緣空修三解脫;菩薩緣諸法實相修三解脫。」智者見空及與不空,此空不空亦名「中道」。若見此空,即見佛性。又二乘觀夢中十八事,夢中內事不可得,名「內法空」;夢外事不可得,名「外法空」;乃至夢中十八有不可得,名「十八空」。今圓觀眠法不可得,無內法,從眠所生一切內法皆不可得,名「內法空」;一切法趣此內空。眠無外法,從眠所生一切外法不可得,即「外法空」;一切法趣此外空。乃至眠法十八種有不可得,名「十八空」;一切法趣十八空、歷十八緣,名「十八空」,但是一空。《方等》云「大空、小空皆歸一空。」一空即法性實相、諸佛實法。《大品》云「獨空」也。如前觀無明四句不可得,一空一切空,不見四門分別之相,非緣非真無誰所作。王臣〔云云〕。 如是空即無相、無作及一切法;一切法亦如是。當知一解脫門即三解脫門;三解脫門即一門。又四門中皆修三解脫,互無障礙。如此三門,意非次第。別雖次第,皆緣實相。又異通教,通緣空理。復異三藏,三藏緣四諦智。故知三脫及與道品節節有異,須善識之。 又《華嚴》日出先照高山,偏多四榮;鹿苑《三藏》偏多四枯;《方等》、《般若》多調枯以入榮、引小而歸大;鶴林施化已足,於榮枯中間而入涅槃。為極鈍難化,來至雙樹,始復畢功。利根明悟,處處得入。如身子等於《法華》中入祕密藏,得見佛性。所以《涅槃》遙指八千聲聞於《法華》中得記作佛,如秋收冬藏更無所作。約此一番施化早畢,不俟涅槃。又云:「誰能莊嚴娑羅雙樹?」即舉舍利弗六人,又別舉如來。若見佛性,能莊嚴雙樹,於其中間而入涅槃。身子六人既能莊嚴,豈不見佛性,於其中間入於涅槃?聲聞尚爾,諸菩薩等處處得入,其義可知。若入涅槃,成五解脫。不即六法,不離六法,三佛性意〔云云〕。
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
《摩訶止觀》卷第七〔上〕,由隋代天台智者大師宣說,門人灌頂記錄。
識通塞:破塞,也要護通
第五乘是識通塞,也叫『知得失』,又叫『知字非字』。前面以破法遍觀察,本應通達無生;若仍未能進入,就應追查究竟得在何處、失在何處,必定是滯著於某種是非,不能只作一面理解。
為什麼?如果像外道那樣愛著能觀空的智慧,就應再用四句周遍破除;此時,能破的觀智已和所破的執著一樣成了塞,必須使一切阻塞重新通達。若並不執著觀空智慧,能破便不同於所破,只須破除塞而保存通。這像除去眼膜而養護明珠,也像破除賊眾而保護良將。能如此,才是善知通塞的大導師,能率領眾人越過五百由旬。
五百由旬的舊解與三番正解
舊說把六地斷盡見思惑算作三百由旬,七地、八地算四百,九地、十地算五百。這一解釋和《大智度論》不合:論中把二乘算作四百,而二乘之道並不是七地、八地。
攝論師把三界算作三百,再以方便生死、因緣生死補成五百。可是這樣仍未收盡攝論的義理,因為還有有後生死、無後生死;這兩種又應歸在哪一百由旬?
地論師把十信、十住、十行、十迴向、十地配成五百。這又和《法華經》不合。《法華經》說越過三百由旬才化作一城,依這一配法,化城反而在二百由旬處便出現了。
又有人把三界配三百,把聲聞、辟支佛二乘補作四百、五百。這有三項過失。第一,既在三界之外建立化城,為什麼二乘出了三界還不入城,反要再走第四百、第五百由旬?第四百、第五百之外又沒有另一化城,他們究竟要進入何處,才可稱為二乘?第二,化城滅去以後才可再向前,城還沒有滅,怎能便越進第四百、第五百由旬?第三,聲聞、辟支佛共同進入化城,為什麼又把聲聞單配四百、辟支佛單配五百?
又有人把五住煩惱配成五百。然而二乘已斷四住,照此便應在四百由旬之外建立化城,仍不合經文。又有人以斷三界思惑為三百、塵沙惑為四百、無明惑為五百。這也不對:由旬原用來譬喻煩惱,為什麼數量多的見惑不計,反把較少的思惑算成三百?
五百由旬這一名義本出《法華經》。經中舉五百為譬,以生死為險道,又以導師能觀察、了知險道相合。要與經文相會,應從三方面各說一番五百:第一依生死的處所,第二依煩惱,第三依智慧。前述諸師的解釋,無論方圓配置或動止進退,都不能和經文契合,就像拿只有一孔的匙,想開有三道鎖齒的鎖。
第一家依通教位次,只說到四百便建立化城;攝論師依生死種類,把另外兩種生死割置於荒野之外;地論師依別教位次,反把化城立在三界以內;再下一家筆直前行,不待開除權法,便自行顯出實法。諸家都有這些過失。
那麼《大智度論》的本意又怎樣?論中有兩段文字:前一段以二乘為四百,到此便停止,並未立第五百;後一段卻把二乘算作一百。現在可以這樣會通:論中前段是依通教之意而說,通教以真諦為極處;越過三界以後,尚未破除化城,只是進入涅槃,所以就把涅槃指作四百。後段又把二乘算作一百,是另從出假菩薩說:菩薩從空出假,離開二乘涅槃算一百,進入三界則算三百。這樣解釋,對經、論都沒有妨礙。
現在正明五百由旬。第一,依生死處所說:三界果報是三百,方便有餘土是四百,實報無礙土是五百。第二,依煩惱說:見諦惑是一百,五下分結是二百,五上分結是三百,塵沙惑是四百,無明惑是五百。第三,依觀智說:空觀智知三百,假觀智知四百,中觀智知五百。這三番與經文相會,沒有前述諸師的過失。
橫通塞、竪通塞與橫織竪
諸師判定的位次太遙遠。初心行人連見惑都尚未斷,怎能一下越過五百由旬?現在所論的由旬有橫向的通塞,也有竪向的通塞。
橫向通塞具約三種法。第一,苦諦、集諦是塞,道諦、滅諦是通。第二,無明與其所起十二因緣是塞,無明滅及十二因緣滅是通。第三,六蔽覆心是塞,六度是通。
竪向通塞也有三層。第一,見思惑與分段生死是塞,從假入空觀是通。第二,無知與方便生死是塞,從空入假觀是通。第三,無明、因緣生死等是塞,中道正觀是通。
現在應以橫向三法交織竪向三觀,逐一檢查通與塞。先說從假入空,破除各種見思惑。見惑有單四句、複四句、具足四句、無言等見,思惑則有九九八十一品。這些惑本來污穢,會增長煩惱、遮塞行人,怎能忽然反取著它,認為它是或非?若因此生起種種結使與業,漏落生死,就只見苦、集而不見道、滅。不認識見思惑中的四諦,正是對此事無知,所以名為無明;由此一直構成十二因緣乃至老死。無明不滅,因緣便不壞;因為堅固執著、難以捨離,所以只留在此岸,不能到達彼岸。
《大般涅槃經》說,童子飢餓時拿取糞中的果子,智者呵責他,他便羞赧慚愧。執惑也使人失去清淨法,這就叫塞。若面對種種見解,只要才起一念,便知它沒有實在自性,是無常、無主;顛倒既破,便不造業;無業便沒有果,這叫道,因有道所以有滅。若能識得四諦,便沒有無明,也沒有老死。因緣壞了,就能捨離諸有而到彼岸。應依這一意思,遍歷每一念心、每一能觀、每一所觀。若在諦、緣、度三方面生起三種塞,就破除它,使它通;若是三種通,就養護它,使它成就。
再者,所觀之見體性即空,能觀之智也即空。阿羅漢之心尚且叫無漏五陰,我的觀智尚未真實,怎能說它不是陰?若執著這個陰為實有,便生結使、業與生死;若不識此陰中的四諦,就是無明;若愛著觀空智慧,便不能捨離。因此仍須以即空之意遍歷每一念心、每一能觀、每一所觀。若有三塞,就破而使通;若是三通,就養護成就。這才是善巧越過見思之塞,通過三百由旬。
其次,以橫織竪檢查從空入假觀的通塞,較容易明白。對病法、藥法、授藥法,都在每一法、每一能觀、每一所觀上清楚識別諦、緣、度。若生三塞,就破而使通;若有三通,就養護成就。如此便越過無知之塞,通過四百由旬。
再其次,以橫織竪檢查中道正觀。對無明、法性、真緣等,也在每一法、每一能觀、每一所觀上明白識別諦、緣、度。若生三塞,就破而使通;若有三通,就養護成就。如此便越過無明之塞,通過五百由旬。
如果只按這種次第竪向來說通塞,要到六地、初地,動輒經過多劫,塞才得通。《大般涅槃經》說,須陀洹經八萬劫才到,依次乃至辟支佛經十千劫才到,到的是菩薩初發心住。這是在論聖者位次,對初心行人有什麼幫助?
初心的橫別三觀
再從橫向各別說通塞。《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》說,有菩薩從初發心便與薩婆若相應,這是與空相應。初發心若尚未相應,就應以諦、緣、度檢查每一念心;若有三塞,破而使通;若有三通,養護成就,便能越過三百由旬。
經中又說,有菩薩從初發心便能遊戲神通、清淨佛國土,這是出假的意思。初發心若修假觀,也用諦、緣、度檢查每一念心,破塞養通,越過四百由旬。
經中又說,有菩薩從初發心便能坐道場、成正覺,這是中觀的意思。初發心若修中觀,也以諦、緣、度檢查每一念心,破塞養通,越過五百由旬。
這樣說雖使初心也能論通塞,空、假、中三法卻仍各自分開。《大智度論》舉三種譬喻:第一徒步跋涉,第二乘馬,第三運用神通。徒步、乘馬而行,都須識別道路通塞;神通本來無礙,阻塞不能遮蔽,山壁也都如虛空,還有什麼通路可供選擇?以初觀譬喻徒步,次觀譬喻乘馬,後觀譬喻飛行,三義仍然分張,也不是這裡所要採用的觀法。
若竪向論三觀,前兩觀在自己當下範圍內是通,對望上一觀又成為塞;最後一觀勝過下兩觀是通,卻也因隔別小法而成塞。若橫向論三觀,每一觀在自己範圍內是通,不能互相收攝便是塞。這些法相本已有淺深通塞,何況行者又在其中生起苦、集、無明、六蔽等?所以三觀都可能成塞,不再有通。
一心三觀:無通無塞而雙照通塞
若觀一心三觀的法相,就能破竪向三觀中的通塞;若觀三觀只是一心,就能破橫向三觀中的通塞。空觀當下即具三觀,所以破徒步、山壁與三百由旬的通塞;假觀當下即具三觀,所以破乘馬與四百由旬的通塞;中觀當下即具三觀,所以連神通本身的通塞也破。
正因一心當下能即空、即假、即中,一切山河石壁、眾魔群道便都如虛空。一心三觀遊行其中,全無障礙,終究不必離開低處去攀高處,也不必避開山嶺而改走谷地。所觸一切塞都通達無礙,便能越過五百由旬,到達寶所,這叫通。可是通本來相對於塞而立;既然所觸之處都如虛空,就不再有塞,沒有塞也便沒有通。
如果在無塞、無通之處又生起苦、集、無明與障蔽,就不只失去神通,也連乘馬、徒步都失去。此時能破已同於所破,字變成非字,如蟲蛀木頭偶然留下三觀二字的形跡,那隻蟲卻不知道這究竟是字還是非字。
若在每一法、每一能觀、每一所觀上,都即空、即假、即中,具足諦、緣、度,便叫無通無塞而雙照通塞。能如此,才是有智慧的人識得字與非字,也像良醫知道得與失。在無生門中能清楚識別通塞,在其餘法門也都應如此。這就是初心越過五百由旬,其中還應以六即義分判〔云云〕。
問:通塞、得失、字非字,究竟是一還是不同?
答:三者是同一意旨的不同說法,也各有差別。通塞約理解而說,得失約實行而說,字非字約教法而說。《金光明經》說:正聞、正聽、正分別、正解於緣、正能覺了。知字非字相當於正聞、正聽;知得失相當於正分別、正解於緣;知通塞相當於正能覺了。三者雖有這些差別,仍共同顯示同一意旨。
問:橫向的塞能不能塞住竪向的通?竪向的塞能不能塞住橫向的通?橫向的通能不能通過竪向的塞?竪向的通能不能通過橫向的塞?
答:從第一層說可以,從第二層細說則不可以。說可以,是因無明當下即是見思,怎會不是橫向障礙?中道智慧能治一切,又怎會不能通過橫向之塞?這只是一往而說的可以。若二往分別,橫塞所障較近,不能塞住竪通;橫通力量較弱,不能通過竪塞;竪塞深遠,不成為橫向障礙;竪通各自對治相應的塞,也不通於橫塞。
道品的四種組織
第六乘明道品調適。道品有四種組織:第一當分,第二相攝,第三約位,第四相生。
第一,當分。不一定要具足所有道品才可得道。四念處、四正勤、四如意足三組四法,五根、五力兩組五法,以及單獨的七覺支、八正道,各在自身當分都可以是道,所以說可以依念處得道,又說三十七品是道場、是摩訶衍。念處如此,其餘各品也同樣如此。這是當分道品,還不是調停。
第二,相攝。譬如四念處一法便能收攝其餘各品;《大智度論》的意思是,念處既能攝其餘道品,其餘道品也能攝念處。這是相攝道品,也不是調停。
第三,約位。四念處在念處自身之位,四正勤配煖位,四如意足配頂位,五根配忍位,五力配世第一位,八正道配見諦位,七覺支配修道位。這是依位次安立,也不是調停。
第四,相生。修四念處能生四正勤,四正勤發起四如意足,四如意足生五根,五根生五力,五力生七覺支,七覺支進入八正道,這才叫善巧調適。戒、定、慧等都名為正;清淨之心恆常專一,便能見般若。這是相生,也就是調適。
為什麼需要道品調適?前面雖已破法遍、識通塞,若不調停道品,怎能迅速與真法相應?真法名為無漏,道品在這裡是有漏;有漏道品能作無漏的方便。方便若失去適當分寸,便難以會入真理。這像釀酒:酵的暖度適宜,就能使水變成酒;麴與糵若失去分寸,酒味便不能成就。《大智度論》說,三十七品是行道之法,涅槃城有三門。三門是近因,道品是遠因。由於這一緣故,必須調停道品。
道品不是二乘專法
問:道品是二乘法,怎會也是菩薩道?
答:《大智度論》呵斥這個問題:是誰說這種話?三藏與摩訶衍都不作這種說法,怎能獨自斷定道品只是小乘法?《維摩詰所說經》說,道品是善知識,由它成就正覺;道品是道場,也是摩訶衍。《大般涅槃經》說,能修八正道的人便見佛性,名為得到醍醐。《大方等大集經》說,三十七品是菩薩的寶炬陀羅尼。這些經典都明說道品,道品何曾只是小乘?
《大般涅槃經》又說,三十七品是涅槃之因,卻不是大涅槃之因;無量阿僧祇助菩提法才是大涅槃之因。這不是說道品之外另有一套道品,正如四諦之外沒有第五諦。只直說一種苦、集,其量如爪上土;詳細分別苦、集,便有無量相,如十方世界所有大地。一套三十七品是涅槃因;另有無量套三十七助道品,便名大涅槃因。為何可以無量?因為有四種道諦,也有十六門。
又有有漏道品:欲界有二十二品,未到定有三十六品,初禪有三十七品,都是有漏道品,如乳;三藏教道品如酪;通教道品如生酥;別教道品如熟酥;圓教道品如醍醐。《大般涅槃經》的文義正與此相合,並不是在道品之外另有助法。
有時說三十七品是助道,有時又說它是正道。《大智度論》說這是菩薩道,文意似在說正道;《維摩詰所說經》說道品是善知識、由此成正覺,文意似在說助道。
又有人若說三十七品都是有漏,就要回答:七覺支為何被說成修道?《法華經》為何說有無漏的根、力、覺、道之財?八正道又為何排在七覺支之前?
這應分成三句:第一,三十七品全是有漏;第二,全是無漏;第三,也有漏也無漏。
先說全是有漏。《大智度論》說,修八正道能得到最初的善有漏五陰。善有漏五陰就是煖法;連煖法以前都能修八正道,究竟怎樣修呢?最初從老師領受法門,把心繫在其上而憶念,叫四念處;為求此法,勤勉實行,叫四正勤;在一心中修行,叫四如意足;五種善根生起,叫五根;根得到增長,叫五力;分別道的作用,叫七覺支;安穩地在道中行,叫八正道。能這樣修,就得到善有漏五陰,所以知道道品全可屬有漏。
再說全是無漏。見諦與思惟所行的道品,一向都是無漏,《法華經》的文意正在這裡。以往雖說有漏位中也能修八正道、七覺支等,卻沒有經論明文作證。
《阿毘曇毘婆沙論》卻說,若八正道排在七覺支之後,可以是有漏,也可以是無漏。為什麼?依八正道進入見諦,就也屬無漏。若八正道排在七覺支之前,則一向是無漏。這便容易理解。引婆沙文,是為證成前述兩種意思。既可有漏也可無漏,正是依位次相對而說。
各種道諦的三十七品,這裡不一一具錄;現在只明無作道諦的三十七品,用以成就一心三觀之義。
無作四念處
《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》的意思是:若要以一切種智修四念處,就應知念處就是法界,能收攝一切法;一切法都趨向念處,沒有任何一法超過這一趨向。《大方廣佛華嚴經》說,大地只有一個,卻能生起種種芽,大地便是眾芽之種。《法華經》說,一切種種的相、體、性,都是同一種相、體、性。是哪一種?就是佛種的相、體、性。通常有人說《法華經》不明佛性,可是經文明說一種,這究竟是哪一種?各類卉木叢林譬喻七方便,大地一種譬喻唯一實事,名為佛種。
現在一念心生起不可思議之觀,當下就是一切種,十法界的陰、入彼此不相妨礙。
先觀法性之色。因為法性由因緣生,所以一種就是一切種,一色就是一切色。因為法性空,所以一切色就是一色,一空就是一切空。因為法性是假,所以一色就是一切色,一假就是一切假。因為法性是中,所以既非一也非一切,卻雙照一與一切;這也叫非空非假而雙照空假,所以一切色也都非空非假而雙照空假。九法界之色都即空、即假、即中,也同樣如此。這就叫身念處。
再觀法性之受。因為法性之受由因緣生,所以一種就是一切種,一受就是一切受。因為法性之受空,所以一切受就是一受,一空就是一切空。因為法性之受是假名,所以一受就是一切受,一假就是一切假。因為法性之受是中,所以既非一受也非一切受,非空非假而雙照空假;一切受也都非空非假而雙照空假。九法界之受都即空、即假、即中,也同樣如此。這就叫受念處。
再觀法性之心是因緣生法,所以一種就是一切種,一心就是一切心。因為法性空,所以一切心就是一心,一空就是一切空。因為法性是假,所以一心就是一切心,一假就是一切假。因為法性是中,所以既非一也非一切,非空非假而雙照空假。九法界之心也同樣如此。這就叫心念處。
再觀法性中想、行兩陰是因緣生法,所以一種就是一切種,一行就是無量行。因為法性空,所以一切行就是一行,一空就是一切空。因為法性是假,所以一行就是一切行,一假就是一切假。因為法性是中,所以既非一也非一切,非空非假而雙照空假;一切行也都非空非假而雙照空假。九法界之行都即空、即假、即中,也同樣如此。這就叫法念處。
這樣的念處力量與作用廣大,義理兼攝大、小,能一同破除八倒,一同顯出榮、枯,又雙非榮枯,就在中間進入般涅槃。它也叫坐道場,也叫摩訶衍,也叫法界。
八倒、榮枯與中間
念處兼攝廣博的義相究竟如何?
法性之色實際並不是淨,凡夫卻橫計為淨,這叫顛倒;它實際也不是不淨,二乘人卻橫計為不淨,這也叫顛倒。現在觀色種即空,一切色也都即空;空中沒有淨,怎能再染著?這叫凡夫計淨之倒被破,枯念處成就。色種即假,一切色也都即假,名相分別無有窮盡;假智恆常清淨,不受無知與塵沙惑污染,怎能滯著空而取灰身滅智,說色定是不淨?這叫二乘計不淨之倒被破,榮念處成就。如此便是八倒一同被破,枯、榮兩種念處一同成立。
再觀色的本際非空非假,一切色也都非空非假。因為非空,所以不是不淨倒;因為非假,所以不是淨倒。不是淨倒,所以不是榮樹;不是不淨倒,所以不是枯樹。非枯非榮便不是兩邊;沒有邊,也沒有另一個中,才名為中間。佛會入這一理,所以名為涅槃,也就是非淨非不淨。八倒不生名為涅槃,這樣的涅槃名為祕密藏。佛把諸子安置在祕密藏中,自己也安住其中,所以說入。
法性之受本來不是樂,凡夫卻橫計為樂,這叫顛倒;它實際也不是苦,二乘人卻橫計為苦。現在觀受種即空,一切受都空;空中沒有樂,怎會生起染著?凡夫之倒便破,枯念處成就。受種即假,一切受都假;以無所受而受一切受,對名聞分別也不生厭惡恐懼,怎會把它捨棄,沉入空與灰斷?二乘之倒便破,榮念處成就。這叫兩倒一同破除、枯榮一同成立。
再觀受的本際非空非假。因為非空,所以非枯;因為非假,所以非榮。邊倒不生名為涅槃,中間之理顯現名為祕密藏,都和上面所說相同〔云云〕。
法性之心本來不是常,凡夫卻橫計為常,這叫常倒;法性實際也不是無常,二乘卻橫計為無常。現在觀心種即空,一切心都即空;空中沒有常,怎能說心念念相續?這叫凡夫常倒被破,枯念處成就。心即假名,一切心也都假;心若只可說是無常,又怎能分別無量心相?這叫二乘無常倒被破,榮念處成就。
再觀心即非空非假。因為非空,所以不是無常;因為非假,所以不是常。非榮非枯,邊倒不生,名為進入涅槃;中道之理顯現,名為祕密藏。佛安置諸子,自己也進入其中〔云云〕。
法性之法本來不是有我,凡夫卻橫計有我;它本來也不是無我,二乘卻橫計無我。現在觀法性即空,一切法都空;空中沒有我,這叫凡夫有我之倒被破,枯念處成就。法性即假,一切法都依假而施設,自在無滯,『我』之義具足,這叫二乘無我之倒被破,榮念處成就。再觀法的本際非空非假。因為非空,所以不是無我;因為非假,所以不是有我。邊倒不生,名為進入涅槃;中間之理顯現,名為祕密藏。
用以對治顛倒的法藥共有四種。以法性觀智名之為念,以一諦即三諦名之為處。一切即空,一切顛倒以及榮枯無不空寂;一切即假,兩邊的雙樹無不成立;一切即中,沒有一法不是法界。只是一念心,卻如此廣大深遠。
若能深觀念處,當下便是坐道場,是摩訶衍,是在雙樹中間進入般涅槃;從始至終已經具足,不必再修其餘法。若仍不能進入,就更進一步研修其餘道品。
四正勤與四如意足
勤勉觀察四念處,名為四正勤。見思惑原已生起,名為已生惡;觀它即空,使已生之惡不再生,所以勤加精進。塵沙惑與無明惑尚未現起,名為未生惡;觀它即假、即中,使未生之惡不生,所以勤加精進。行者竭盡力量與誠心,修行四種三昧,遮止這兩類惡。
一切智名為已生善;這種善較容易生,所以說泥洹之道容易得到。道種智與一切種智名為未生善;這種分別智較難生。空智既已生起,便勤使它增長;中智尚未生起,便使它開發。三觀相續無間,只是為生起這兩種智慧。四正勤也能使人悟道,所以說一心勤加精進,便得三菩提,不須再修其餘法。
若仍不能進入,應是勤力不足、心太散動,便須進入善寂,審細觀察心性,名為上定。在上定中修欲、精進、心、思惟四如意足。
欲如意足,是專心趨向所修之法,也叫莊嚴所修之法。定中的觀智像密室中的燈,照物便清楚明了;因為照了,所以斷行成就,修成欲如意足。
精進如意足,是成就所修之法。法性本來不動,行者卻在寂然中精進,相續無間、沒有夾雜;如此斷行成就,修成精進如意足。
心如意足,是正住觀察所修之法,在一心中緣取它。把心制在一處,就沒有事情不能辦成;如此斷行成就,修成心如意足。
思惟如意足,是善能分別所修之法及其方便。這樣思惟而不使心動散;因為定中思惟,所以斷行成就,修成思惟如意足。
能如此修,便以定心進入,不須其餘法。若仍不能進入,就應修五根。
五根與五力
信三諦之理是三世諸佛之母,能生一切十力、無畏、解脫與三昧。只修念處,不向外另求其餘法,名為信根。
精進根,是以信攝受一切法;因為信受諸法,所以加倍策勵精進。
念根,是只念正道與助道,不使邪妄得以進入。又因這一法是精進所修,便不忘失此法,所以名為念根。
定根,是一心寂定而行精進。又因這一法受念所攝,便不忘失、不動搖,所以名為定根。
慧根,是念處之慧受定法收攝,內在自性自己照見,不從別人而知,所以名為慧根。
只修五根也能入道,成就摩訶衍。若仍不能進入,就進一步修五力,使五根增長;能遮止種種煩惱,所以名為力。
信力能破種種疑惑,沒有任何事能動搖它。精進力能除懈怠,依自己本來所願,一切都得成就。念力能破邪想,不受煩惱破壞。
定力能破散亂,遠離憒鬧。即使有所言說,也不妨礙初禪;善住覺、觀,也不妨礙二禪;心生歡喜,也不妨礙三禪;教化眾生,也不妨礙四禪。能妨礙四禪之法,不妨礙其餘諸定;行者也不捨棄定,又不隨定流轉,這就叫定力。
慧力能破邪執,一切執與一切慧雙照具足,這就叫慧力。這五力都名為摩訶衍。若仍不能進入,就用七覺支均平調適。
七覺支與八正道
心浮動時,用除覺支除去身、口的麁重,用捨覺支捨離對觀智的取著,用定覺支使心入禪。心沉沒時,便用精進覺支、擇法覺支、喜覺支使它振起。念覺支通緣浮、沉兩邊。修這七覺支,便能入道。《大智度論》說,若已離五蓋,又專修七覺支,卻仍不得進入,絕沒有這種道理。若仍不能進入,就修八正道。
先用出世間最上品的正見觀三諦之理,再以正思惟發動此觀。依真實法相而說,使自己與他人都得利益,就是正語。
黑業得黑報,白業得白報,雜業得雜報,非白非黑業得非白非黑報;若依小乘解釋,容易明白。現在則說,沉空是黑業,出假是白業,空、假兩者兼行是雜業,中道是非白非黑業,這些都名為邪命。若所造之業能窮盡一切業,名為正業;依此而行,也名為正業。正業不受空、有二邊牽引。
看見別人得利,心中不惱熱;對自己的利養則恆常知止知足,這是正命。善能進入正諦,名為正精進。心不因境而動搖失守,正直而不忘失,名為正念。安住正法、決定不移,名為正定。由這八正道,便能進入真理。《大般涅槃經》說,若有人能修八正道,就能得到醍醐。
這樣的道品不是依位次相對而立,而是在初心觀法性理時便能具足。《大智度論》的意思是:四念處中的四種精進名為四正勤,四種定心名為四如意足,五種善根生起名為根,根得到增長名為力,分別四念處之道的作用名為覺,四念處安穩地在道中行名為八正道。
所以知道,初心行道便能用三十七品調養止觀與四種三昧,進入菩薩位。這樣的道品是大涅槃近因,其餘各種道品則名遠因〔云云〕。
道樹開花結果
現在用譬喻顯示這一義。把種子種在地中,芽嘴最初裂開,根向下生,枝葉向上舒展,花朵繁盛開放,最後結成果實。
法性、法界像大地;念處觀像種子;四正勤像抽芽;五根像根向下生;五力像莖葉增長;七覺支像開花;八正道像結果。結果就是進入銅輪位,證無生忍,也叫到達寶所,也叫進入祕密藏,也叫得到醍醐,也叫見佛性,也叫法身顯現而以八相作佛。所謂道品是善知識、由此成正覺,說的正是這件事。
若從通途解釋道樹,《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》明說:離開三惡道名為葉益,得到人、天之身名為花益,得到四道果名為果益;這是偏依空觀解釋。免離二乘地名為葉益,得到變化神通之身名為花益,具足道種智名為果益;這是偏依假觀解釋。免離空、有二邊繫縛名為葉益,領受法性身名為花益,證入佛性名為果益;這是偏依中觀解釋。若總依三觀解釋,即空名為葉益,即假名為花益,即中名為果益〔云云〕。
三三昧與三解脫門
再者,行三十七道品將要到達無漏城。城域有三門;進入這三門,便能發起真無漏,即空門、無相門、無作門,也叫三解脫門,也叫三三昧。
若從正見、正思惟進入定,再從定發起無漏,此時正見之智名為大臣,正定名為大王;依這一定為主的關係,名為三三昧。所謂沒有智慧便不成禪定,正是這個意思。
若由正定生起正見,再從正見發起無漏,此時正定是大臣,智慧是大王;依這一智慧為主的關係,名為三解脫。所謂沒有禪定便不成智慧,正是這個意思。
也可以說,三昧屬伏道,解脫屬斷道與證道。也可以說,定、慧相合,所以三昧當下就是解脫,解脫當下就是三昧。
若依三藏教,苦諦下的空、無我兩行是空門,滅諦下的四行是無相門,集諦、道諦下的八行加上苦諦下另外兩行是無作門。十六行中智慧與禪定互作王臣等義,均可依此推知〔云云〕。
若依通教,明苦、集都如幻化,就是空門。古本《大智度論》說,若觀極微之色,便有十八空;當時所見今本則說,若觀一端疊布,便有十八空。疊是假名,極微是實法,兩本的差異在此。若領會義旨,假法與實法其實都空。
若尚未進入空,便會生起情想戲論,執著有一個空相;知道空本身沒有空相,名為無相門。空相雖空,若還執著能觀的智慧,就仍有取著;既已沒有能觀與所觀,究竟是誰在作空觀?這名為無作門。既沒有作者,又有誰生起願求?所以也名無願。通教三三昧中禪定與智慧的王臣關係,也可依此推知〔云云〕。
若依別教,從假入空而證真諦,名為空三昧。二乘只證得這一空,仍留有空相;菩薩知道空並非固定的空,便出假教化眾生,不再留有空相,名為無相三昧;再進修中道,不存中、邊之相,也不求中或邊,名為無作三昧。別教三觀中智慧與禪定的王臣關係,也可依此推知〔云云〕。
再專依別教出假之意說:分別無量藥與無量病,全是假名;假名沒有實體,因無實體所以空,這名空門。空本身尚且沒有空相,何況還會有假相?所以名無相門。空、假既都無相,也不願求知病識藥,所以名無願。出假智中智慧與禪定的王臣關係,也可依此推知〔云云〕。
若專依圓教,名稱雖與前面相同,意義卻大不相同。《大智度論》的意思是,聲聞緣空而修三解脫,菩薩緣一切法實相而修三解脫。有智慧的人同時見空與不空,這個空、不空也名中道;見到這一空,便見佛性。
二乘觀夢中的十八種事:夢中內在之事不可得,名內法空;夢外之事不可得,名外法空;一直到夢中十八種有都不可得,名十八空。
現在圓觀作夢所依的睡眠法本身不可得。睡眠中沒有內法,從睡眠所生的一切內法也都不可得,名內法空;而一切法都趨向這一內空。睡眠中沒有外法,從睡眠所生的一切外法都不可得,就是外法空;而一切法都趨向這一外空。一直到睡眠法中的十八種有都不可得,名十八空;一切法都趨向十八空,遍歷十八種所緣,名十八空,其實只是一空。
《方等經》的意思是,大空、小空都歸一空。一空就是法性實相,是諸佛真實之法;《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》稱它為獨空。正如前面觀無明四句都不可得,一空就是一切空,不見四門分別之相;既非緣修、亦非真修,能觀與所觀皆不可得,便無作者可立。圓教中智慧與禪定的王臣關係,也可依此推知〔云云〕。
這樣的空當下就是無相、無作,也就是一切法;一切法也同樣如此。因此應知,一解脫門就是三解脫門,三解脫門也就是一門。又在四門中的每一門都修三解脫,彼此沒有障礙。這三門的意義並非次第。
別教雖依次第修,仍都緣於實相;它又不同於通教,因為通教只緣空理;更不同於三藏教,因為三藏教緣四諦之智。所以應知道,三解脫與道品每一節都有差異,必須善加識別。
一代施化與雙樹中間
《大方廣佛華嚴經》如日出先照高山,偏多四榮;鹿苑三藏教偏多四枯;方等與般若多用以調整四枯而使人進入四榮,引導小乘歸向大乘;到了鶴林,施化已經完足,佛便在榮枯中間進入涅槃。極為鈍根、難以教化的人,直到雙樹才終於完成;利根明悟的人,則處處都能進入。
例如舍利弗等人在《法華經》中進入祕密藏,得見佛性。所以《大般涅槃經》遙指八千聲聞已在《法華經》中受記作佛,像秋收冬藏,已沒有其餘事情可作。依這一番施化說,他們早已完成,不必等到《大般涅槃經》法會。
經中又問,誰能莊嚴娑羅雙樹?隨即舉出舍利弗等六人,又另外舉出如來。能見佛性,便能莊嚴雙樹,在雙樹中間進入涅槃。舍利弗等六人既能莊嚴雙樹,怎會沒有見佛性、沒有在其中間進入涅槃?聲聞尚且如此,諸菩薩等處處得入的義理,也就可以知道。
若入涅槃,便成就五解脫。五解脫不就是六法,卻也不離六法;其中具足三佛性之意〔云云〕。
Fascicle Seven [Upper] of the Mohe Zhiguan, taught by the Tiantai Great Master Zhizhe of the Sui dynasty and recorded by his disciple Guanding.
Discerning Passage and Obstruction: Break Obstruction and Protect Passage
The fifth vehicle is discerning passage and obstruction. It is also called “knowing gain and loss” and “knowing word and nonword.” The preceding contemplation that pervasively breaks through Dharmas should have opened passage into nonarising. If entry still has not occurred, one must investigate precisely where the gain and loss lie. One is necessarily caught in some affirmation or negation and cannot understand the matter from only one side.
Why? If, like a non-Buddhist, one cherishes the wisdom that contemplates emptiness, that wisdom must again be pervasively broken through the four alternatives. At this point the contemplation that actively breaks has become an obstruction just like the attachment it breaks, so every obstruction must be opened anew into passage. If one does not cling to the wisdom that contemplates emptiness, what actively breaks differs from what is broken; one need only break obstruction while preserving passage. This resembles removing a film from the eye while nurturing its bright jewel, or defeating a band of thieves while protecting a good general. Only one who can do this is a great guide skilled in knowing passage and obstruction, able to lead the multitude beyond five hundred yojanas.
Old Explanations of the Five Hundred Yojanas and the Correct Three Rounds
An old explanation counts the exhaustion of the delusions of views and thought at the sixth ground as three hundred yojanas, the seventh and eighth grounds as four hundred, and the ninth and tenth grounds as five hundred. This does not agree with the Great Treatise, which counts the Two Vehicles as four hundred, although the path of the Two Vehicles is not the seventh or eighth ground.
Masters of the Mahāyānasaṃgraha count the three realms as three hundred and add transformational birth-and-death and causal birth-and-death to make five hundred. Yet this still does not exhaust their own treatise’s meaning, for there are also birth-and-death with a remainder and birth-and-death without a remainder. To which hundred yojanas should these two belong?
Masters of the Daśabhūmika correlate the ten faiths, ten abodes, ten practices, ten dedications, and ten grounds with the five hundreds. This again disagrees with the Lotus Sūtra. The sūtra says that a city is conjured only after three hundred yojanas have been crossed; on this correlation, the phantom city would instead appear at the two-hundred-yojana point.
Others correlate the three realms with three hundred and add the two vehicles of śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas as the fourth and fifth hundreds. This has three faults. First, if the phantom city is established beyond the three realms, why do followers of the Two Vehicles leave the three realms without entering it and instead travel another fourth and fifth hundred yojanas? There is no further phantom city beyond the fourth and fifth hundreds. Where exactly would they enter so as to be called the Two Vehicles? Second, one can proceed only after the phantom city vanishes. How could they advance into the fourth and fifth hundreds while the city has not yet vanished? Third, śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas enter the phantom city together. Why assign śrāvakas alone to the fourth hundred and pratyekabuddhas alone to the fifth?
Others correlate the five abiding afflictions with the five hundreds. Yet followers of the Two Vehicles have already severed the four abiding afflictions, so this would require placing the phantom city beyond four hundred yojanas and would still disagree with the sūtra. Still others count the delusions of thought in the three realms as three hundred, delusions innumerable as dust and sand as four hundred, and ignorance as five hundred. This too is wrong. Yojanas originally symbolize afflictions; why exclude the more numerous delusions of views yet count the fewer delusions of thought as three hundred?
The expression “five hundred yojanas” comes from the Lotus Sūtra. The sūtra presents the five hundred as a simile, calls birth-and-death a dangerous road, and corresponds this with the guide’s ability to examine and know that road. To meet the sūtra’s text, one must explain five hundred in three distinct rounds: first according to the places of birth-and-death, second according to afflictions, and third according to wisdom. None of the foregoing masters’ arrangements—whether square or round, moving or still, advancing or retreating—accords with the sūtra. They resemble trying to open a lock with three teeth by using a key that has only one notch.
The first school follows the stages of the Shared Teaching, speaks only as far as four hundred, and then establishes the phantom city. The Mahāyānasaṃgraha masters follow types of birth-and-death but cut off the other two types and leave them beyond the wilderness. The Daśabhūmika masters follow the stages of the Distinct Teaching and instead place the phantom city within the three realms. The next school proceeds straight ahead and, without waiting for provisional Dharma to be opened and removed, reveals the real on its own. Each school has these faults.
What, then, is the original intent of the Great Treatise? It contains two passages. The first counts the Two Vehicles as four hundred and stops there, without establishing a fifth hundred. The second instead counts the Two Vehicles as one hundred. They can now be reconciled as follows. The first passage speaks according to the Shared Teaching, which takes the true truth as its utmost point. Having crossed the three realms, practitioners have not yet demolished the phantom city but merely enter nirvāṇa; nirvāṇa is therefore designated as the fourth hundred. The later passage counts the Two Vehicles as one hundred because it instead speaks of bodhisattvas entering the provisional: leaving the nirvāṇa of the Two Vehicles is counted as one hundred, and entering the three realms as three hundred. Understood this way, neither sūtra nor treatise is obstructed.
Now for the correct explanation of the five hundred yojanas. First, according to the places of birth-and-death, the recompense of the three realms is three hundred, the Land of Skillful Means with Remainder is four hundred, and the Land of Unobstructed Real Reward is five hundred. Second, according to afflictions, delusions concerning the truths are one hundred, the five lower fetters are two hundred, the five higher fetters are three hundred, delusions innumerable as dust and sand are four hundred, and ignorance is five hundred. Third, according to contemplative wisdom, the wisdom of contemplating emptiness knows three hundred, the wisdom of contemplating provisionality knows four hundred, and the wisdom of contemplating the Middle knows five hundred. These three rounds meet the sūtra’s text and have none of the foregoing masters’ faults.
Horizontal Passage and Obstruction, Vertical Passage and Obstruction, and Weaving the Horizontal through the Vertical
The stages fixed by the various masters are too remote. A beginner has not yet severed even the delusions of views; how could such a person immediately cross five hundred yojanas? The yojanas discussed here include horizontal passage and obstruction as well as vertical passage and obstruction.
Horizontal passage and obstruction are explained through three kinds of Dharma. First, the truths of suffering and origination are obstruction, while the truths of the path and cessation are passage. Second, ignorance and the twelve links of dependent origination it produces are obstruction, while the cessation of ignorance and of the twelve links is passage. Third, the six obscurations covering the mind are obstruction, while the six perfections are passage.
Vertical passage and obstruction also have three levels. First, the delusions of views and thought and fragmentary birth-and-death are obstruction, while contemplation entering emptiness from provisionality is passage. Second, lack of knowledge and transformational birth-and-death are obstruction, while contemplation entering provisionality from emptiness is passage. Third, ignorance, causal birth-and-death, and the rest are obstruction, while correct contemplation of the Middle Way is passage.
The three horizontal Dharmas must now be interwoven with the three vertical contemplations, inspecting passage and obstruction one by one. Begin with entering emptiness from provisionality and breaking the various delusions of views and thought. Delusions of views include simple four alternatives, compound four alternatives, complete four alternatives, ineffable views, and the rest; delusions of thought comprise nine times nine, or eighty-one, grades. These delusions are intrinsically defiled: they increase affliction and obstruct the practitioner. How could one suddenly cling to them instead, taking them to be right or wrong? If they consequently produce the various fetters and karma and one leaks back into birth-and-death, one sees only suffering and origination, not the path and cessation. Failing to recognize the four truths within the delusions of views and thought is precisely ignorance concerning them and is therefore called ignorance. From it arise the twelve links of dependent origination through aging-and-death. If ignorance does not cease, dependent origination is not dismantled. Because one grasps firmly and finds relinquishment difficult, one remains on this shore and cannot reach the other shore.
The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra tells of a hungry child who took fruit from excrement. When a wise person rebuked him, he felt ashamed and abashed. Attachment to delusion likewise causes one to lose pure Dharma; this is called obstruction. When faced with various views, one need only know, the instant a single thought arises, that it has no real intrinsic nature, is impermanent, and has no master. Once inversion is broken, no karma is produced; without karma there is no fruit. This is called the path, and because there is a path there is cessation. If one recognizes the four truths, there is neither ignorance nor aging-and-death. When dependent origination is dismantled, one can relinquish all modes of existence and reach the other shore. Following this meaning, one must pass through every thought-moment, everything that contemplates, and everything contemplated. If the three kinds of obstruction arise within truths, dependent origination, and perfections, break them and open passage. If the three kinds of passage are present, protect and bring them to fulfillment.
Moreover, the nature of the views contemplated is itself empty, and the wisdom that contemplates is itself empty too. Even an arhat’s mind is called the uncontaminated five aggregates. Since my contemplative wisdom is not yet real, how could it not be an aggregate? If one grasps this aggregate as truly existent, it produces fetters, karma, and birth-and-death. If one does not recognize the four truths within this aggregate, that is ignorance. If one cherishes the wisdom that contemplates emptiness, one cannot relinquish it. One must therefore still pass through every thought-moment, everything that contemplates, and everything contemplated by means of immediate emptiness. If the three obstructions are present, break them and open passage; if the three passages are present, protect and fulfill them. This is skillfully crossing the obstruction of views and thought and passing through three hundred yojanas.
Next, weaving the horizontal through the vertical to inspect the passage and obstruction of contemplation entering provisionality from emptiness is easier to understand. For Dharmas of illness, Dharmas of medicine, and the Dharma of administering medicine, clearly distinguish truths, dependent origination, and perfections in every Dharma, everything that contemplates, and everything contemplated. If the three obstructions arise, break them and open passage; if the three passages are present, protect and fulfill them. In this way one crosses the obstruction of lack of knowledge and passes through four hundred yojanas.
Next, weave the horizontal through the vertical to inspect correct contemplation of the Middle Way. For ignorance, Dharma-nature, true conditions, and the rest, clearly distinguish truths, dependent origination, and perfections in every Dharma, everything that contemplates, and everything contemplated. If the three obstructions arise, break them and open passage; if the three passages are present, protect and fulfill them. In this way one crosses the obstruction of ignorance and passes through five hundred yojanas.
If passage and obstruction are taught only in this sequential vertical fashion, one must reach the sixth ground or first ground, often after many eons, before obstruction opens into passage. The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra says that a stream-enterer arrives after eighty thousand eons and, successively, a pratyekabuddha after ten thousand eons; what they reach is a bodhisattva’s abode of initial arousal of mind. This discusses the stages of noble ones. What help is it to a beginner?
The Beginner’s Three Horizontally Distinct Contemplations
Passage and obstruction can next be explained through horizontally distinct contemplations. The Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra says that some bodhisattvas correspond with omniscience from their initial arousal of mind; this is correspondence with emptiness. If a beginner does not yet correspond, that person should inspect every thought-moment through truths, dependent origination, and perfections. If the three obstructions are present, break them and open passage; if the three passages are present, protect and fulfill them. One can thereby cross three hundred yojanas.
The sūtra also says that some bodhisattvas can roam in superknowledges and purify buddha lands from their initial arousal of mind; this is the meaning of entering the provisional. If beginners cultivate contemplation of provisionality, they likewise inspect every thought-moment through truths, dependent origination, and perfections, breaking obstruction, protecting passage, and crossing four hundred yojanas.
The sūtra also says that some bodhisattvas can sit at the site of awakening and accomplish correct awakening from their initial arousal of mind; this is the meaning of contemplation of the Middle. If beginners cultivate contemplation of the Middle, they likewise inspect every thought-moment through truths, dependent origination, and perfections, breaking obstruction, protecting passage, and crossing five hundred yojanas.
Although this account allows beginners to discuss passage and obstruction, the three Dharmas of emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle still remain separate. The Great Treatise gives three similes: first traveling on foot, second riding a horse, and third employing superknowledge. Those traveling on foot or horseback must discern where the road is open and where blocked. Superknowledge, however, is intrinsically unobstructed: obstruction cannot cover it, and mountain walls are all like empty space. What open route remains to be chosen? The first contemplation is compared to walking, the second to riding, and the last to flying. Because these three meanings remain divided, this too is not the contemplative method adopted here.
When the three contemplations are taught vertically, the first two are passage within their present respective scopes but become obstruction in relation to the higher contemplation. The last surpasses the lower two and is passage, yet it too becomes obstruction by remaining isolated as a separate minor Dharma. When the three contemplations are taught horizontally, each is passage within its own scope, but inability to include the others is obstruction. These Dharma-marks already possess shallow and deep forms of passage and obstruction; how much more so when practitioners produce suffering, origination, ignorance, the six obscurations, and the rest within them? All three contemplations can thus become obstruction, leaving no passage at all.
Three Contemplations in One Mind: Neither Passage nor Obstruction, Yet Illuminating Both
Contemplating the Dharma-mark of three contemplations in one mind breaks the passage and obstruction of the vertical three contemplations. Contemplating the three contemplations as only one mind breaks the passage and obstruction of the horizontal three contemplations. Contemplation of emptiness immediately possesses all three contemplations and therefore breaks the passage and obstruction of walking, mountain walls, and three hundred yojanas. Contemplation of provisionality immediately possesses all three and therefore breaks the passage and obstruction of riding and four hundred yojanas. Contemplation of the Middle immediately possesses all three and therefore breaks even the passage and obstruction of superknowledge itself.
Precisely because one mind can immediately be empty, provisional, and the Middle, every mountain, river, stone wall, horde of māras, and group following other paths is like empty space. Three contemplations in one mind roam among them without any obstruction. Ultimately, one need not leave low ground to climb high, nor avoid a mountain ridge to follow a valley. Every obstruction touched becomes open and unobstructed, so one can cross five hundred yojanas and arrive at the place of jewels. This is called passage. Yet passage is originally established in contrast to obstruction. Once everywhere touched is like empty space, there is no obstruction; without obstruction, there is no passage either.
If suffering, origination, ignorance, and obscuration arise anew at the point of neither obstruction nor passage, one loses not only superknowledge but also horseback travel and walking. What actively breaks then becomes the same as what is broken; the word becomes a nonword. It resembles insects boring into wood and accidentally leaving shapes that form the words “three contemplations,” although the insects do not know whether these are words or nonwords.
If every Dharma, everything that contemplates, and everything contemplated is immediately empty, provisional, and the Middle and fully possesses truths, dependent origination, and perfections, this is called neither passage nor obstruction while illuminating passage and obstruction together. Only one capable of this is a person of wisdom who knows word and nonword, like a good physician who knows gain and loss. Passage and obstruction should be clearly distinguished in the gate of nonarising, and likewise in all the other Dharma gates. This is how a beginner crosses five hundred yojanas; the meaning of the six identities should further be used to distinguish its levels, and so forth.
Question: Are passage and obstruction, gain and loss, and word and nonword ultimately identical or different?
Answer: The three are different expressions of one purport, yet they also differ. Passage and obstruction concern understanding, gain and loss concern practice, and word and nonword concern teaching. The Golden Light Sūtra speaks of correct hearing, correct listening, correct discrimination, correct understanding of conditions, and correct awakening. Knowing word and nonword corresponds to correct hearing and correct listening. Knowing gain and loss corresponds to correct discrimination and correct understanding of conditions. Knowing passage and obstruction corresponds to correct awakening. Although the three differ in these respects, they still reveal the same purport together.
Question: Can horizontal obstruction obstruct vertical passage? Can vertical obstruction obstruct horizontal passage? Can horizontal passage pass through vertical obstruction? Can vertical passage pass through horizontal obstruction?
Answer: At a first level one may say yes; examined more finely at a second level, one must say no. One may say yes because ignorance itself is views and thought, so how could it not be a horizontal obstruction? Wisdom of the Middle Way can treat everything, so how could it not pass through horizontal obstruction? This is only the first, provisional answer of yes. Distinguished a second time, horizontal obstruction blocks what is nearer and cannot obstruct vertical passage. Horizontal passage is weaker and cannot pass through vertical obstruction. Vertical obstruction is deep and remote and does not become a horizontal obstruction. Vertical passage treats its corresponding obstruction and does not pass through horizontal obstruction.
Four Arrangements of the Factors of the Path
The sixth vehicle explains regulating the factors of the path. They have four arrangements: first, individually defined; second, mutually inclusive; third, according to stages; and fourth, mutually arising.
First, individually defined. One need not necessarily possess all the factors of the path in order to attain the path. The three groups of four—the four foundations of mindfulness, four right efforts, and four bases of spiritual power—the two groups of five—the five faculties and five powers—and the separate groups of seven factors of awakening and the Noble Eightfold Path can each, in their own individually defined scope, be the path. Thus one may attain the path by relying on the foundations of mindfulness, and the thirty-seven factors are called the site of awakening and the Great Vehicle. What is true of the foundations is true of the remaining groups. These are individually defined factors of the path, not yet regulation.
Second, mutually inclusive. The single Dharma of the four foundations of mindfulness, for example, can include all the remaining groups. The meaning of the Great Treatise is that since the foundations include the remaining factors, the remaining factors also include the foundations. These are mutually inclusive factors of the path, also not regulation.
Third, according to stages. The four foundations of mindfulness occupy their own stage; the four right efforts correspond to the stage of warmth; the four bases of spiritual power to the stage of summit; the five faculties to the stage of tolerance; the five powers to the stage of foremost in the world; the Noble Eightfold Path to the stage of seeing the truths; and the seven factors of awakening to the path of cultivation. This establishes them according to stages and is also not regulation.
Fourth, mutually arising. Cultivating the four foundations of mindfulness can produce the four right efforts. The right efforts activate the four bases of spiritual power; these produce the five faculties; the faculties produce the five powers; the powers produce the seven factors of awakening; and the seven factors enter the Noble Eightfold Path. This alone is called skillful regulation. Moral discipline, meditative concentration, wisdom, and the rest are all called correct. When the pure mind remains constantly one, it can see prajñā. This is mutual arising, which is regulation.
Why must the factors of the path be regulated? Although one has already pervasively broken through Dharmas and discerned passage and obstruction, how could one rapidly correspond with true Dharma without regulating these factors? True Dharma is called uncontaminated, while the factors here are contaminated. Contaminated factors can serve as preparatory means for the uncontaminated. If preparatory means lose their proper measure, they have difficulty entering principle. It resembles brewing wine: when the warmth of fermentation is suitable, water can turn into wine, but if yeast and malt lose their proper balance, the flavor of wine cannot form. The Great Treatise says that the thirty-seven factors are Dharmas for practicing the path and that the city of nirvāṇa has three gates. The three gates are proximate causes; the factors are remote causes. For this reason, the factors of the path must be regulated.
The Factors of the Path Are Not Exclusive to the Two Vehicles
Question: The factors of the path belong to the Two Vehicles. How can they also be the bodhisattva path?
Answer: The Great Treatise rebukes this question: Who says such a thing? Neither the Tripiṭaka nor the Great Vehicle teaches so. How can one alone decide that these factors are only a Small Vehicle Dharma? The Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra says that the factors of the path are good spiritual friends through which correct awakening is accomplished; they are the site of awakening and the Great Vehicle. The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra says that one who can cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path sees buddha-nature and is called one who obtains ghee. The Mahāvaipulya Mahāsaṃnipāta Sūtra says that the thirty-seven factors are the bodhisattva’s Jeweled Torch dhāraṇī. All these scriptures expressly teach the factors of the path. When were they ever exclusive to the Small Vehicle?
The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra also says that the thirty-seven factors are a cause of nirvāṇa but not a cause of great nirvāṇa; immeasurable asaṃkhyeyas of Dharmas assisting awakening are the cause of great nirvāṇa. This does not mean there is another set of factors outside the factors themselves, just as there is no fifth truth beyond the four truths. Stated directly, suffering and origination are single, their measure like earth on a fingernail. Distinguished in detail, suffering and origination possess immeasurable marks, like all the earth in worlds throughout the ten directions. One set of thirty-seven factors is a cause of nirvāṇa; immeasurable sets of thirty-seven factors assisting the path are called a cause of great nirvāṇa. Why can they be immeasurable? Because there are four kinds of the truth of the path and sixteen gates.
There are also contaminated factors of the path. The desire realm has twenty-two, the access concentration has thirty-six, and the first dhyāna has thirty-seven; these are all contaminated factors, like milk. The factors of the Tripiṭaka Teaching are like curds, those of the Shared Teaching like raw butter, those of the Distinct Teaching like refined butter, and those of the Perfect Teaching like ghee. The textual meaning of the Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra corresponds precisely to this; it does not establish separate assisting Dharmas outside the factors.
Sometimes the thirty-seven factors are called aids to the path, while at other times they are called the direct path. The Great Treatise says they are the bodhisattva path, which seems to mean the direct path. The Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra says they are good spiritual friends through which correct awakening is accomplished, which seems to mean aids to the path.
If someone says all thirty-seven factors are contaminated, one must answer: Why are the seven factors of awakening described as the path of cultivation? Why does the Lotus Sūtra speak of the wealth of uncontaminated faculties, powers, factors of awakening, and path? And why is the Noble Eightfold Path ever placed before the seven factors of awakening?
This must be divided into three statements: first, all thirty-seven are contaminated; second, all are uncontaminated; and third, they are both contaminated and uncontaminated.
First, all are contaminated. The Great Treatise says that cultivating the Noble Eightfold Path enables one to obtain the initial wholesome contaminated five aggregates. These five aggregates are the Dharma of warmth. If even before warmth one can cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path, how is it cultivated? At first one receives a Dharma gate from a teacher, fixes the mind upon it, and recollects it: these are the four foundations of mindfulness. Diligently practicing in quest of this Dharma constitutes the four right efforts. Practicing in one mind constitutes the four bases of spiritual power. The arising of five wholesome roots constitutes the five faculties. Their increase constitutes the five powers. Distinguishing the path’s functions constitutes the seven factors of awakening. Traveling securely within the path constitutes the Noble Eightfold Path. Cultivated in this way, they yield the wholesome contaminated five aggregates. Thus all the factors can be contaminated.
Second, all are uncontaminated. The factors practiced in seeing the truths and in cultivation have always been uncontaminated; this is precisely the meaning of the Lotus Sūtra. Although it was formerly said that one can cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path, the seven factors of awakening, and the rest at contaminated stages, no explicit scriptural or treatise passage was adduced as proof.
The Abhidharma Vibhāṣā Treatise, however, says that if the Noble Eightfold Path is placed after the seven factors of awakening, it can be either contaminated or uncontaminated. Why? If one enters seeing the truths through the Noble Eightfold Path, it too is uncontaminated. If the Noble Eightfold Path is placed before the seven factors, it is always uncontaminated. This is easy to understand. The Vibhāṣā is cited to establish the two foregoing meanings. Its being both contaminated and uncontaminated is precisely relative to their stages.
The thirty-seven factors under the various truths of the path will not all be recorded here. Only the thirty-seven nonconstructed factors under the nonconstructed truth of the path are now explained, in order to establish the meaning of three contemplations in one mind.
The Nonconstructed Four Foundations of Mindfulness
The meaning of the Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra is this: if one wishes to cultivate the four foundations of mindfulness through wisdom of all modes, one should know that the foundations themselves are the Dharma realm and include all Dharmas. All Dharmas tend toward the foundations, and none surpasses this tending. The Avataṃsaka Sūtra says that there is only one earth, yet it can produce all kinds of sprouts, so the earth itself is the seed of all sprouts. The Lotus Sūtra says that every variety of mark, substance, and nature is the mark, substance, and nature of a single seed. What seed is this? It is the mark, substance, and nature of the Buddha seed. People commonly say that the Lotus Sūtra does not illuminate buddha-nature, yet the sūtra expressly speaks of one seed. What seed could this be? The various herbs, trees, groves, and forests symbolize the seven preparatory means; the single earth symbolizes the one real matter called the Buddha seed.
When an inconceivable contemplation now arises in one thought-moment, it immediately is every seed, and the aggregates and sense fields of the ten Dharma realms do not obstruct one another.
First contemplate the form of Dharma-nature. Because Dharma-nature arises through conditions, one seed is every seed and one form is every form. Because Dharma-nature is empty, every form is one form and one emptiness is every emptiness. Because Dharma-nature is provisional, one form is every form and one provisionality is every provisionality. Because Dharma-nature is the Middle, it is neither one nor all, yet illuminates both one and all. This is also called neither empty nor provisional yet illuminating both emptiness and provisionality; thus every form is likewise neither empty nor provisional yet illuminates both. The forms of the other nine Dharma realms are immediately empty, provisional, and the Middle in the same way. This is called the foundation of mindfulness of the body.
Next contemplate the feeling of Dharma-nature. Because this feeling arises through conditions, one seed is every seed and one feeling is every feeling. Because the feeling of Dharma-nature is empty, every feeling is one feeling and one emptiness is every emptiness. Because it is a provisional designation, one feeling is every feeling and one provisionality is every provisionality. Because the feeling of Dharma-nature is the Middle, it is neither one feeling nor all feelings, neither empty nor provisional yet illuminating both emptiness and provisionality. The feelings of the other nine Dharma realms are immediately empty, provisional, and the Middle in the same way. This is called the foundation of mindfulness of feelings.
Next contemplate the mind of Dharma-nature as a Dharma arising through conditions. Thus one seed is every seed and one mind is every mind. Because Dharma-nature is empty, every mind is one mind and one emptiness is every emptiness. Because Dharma-nature is provisional, one mind is every mind and one provisionality is every provisionality. Because Dharma-nature is the Middle, it is neither one nor all, neither empty nor provisional yet illuminating both emptiness and provisionality. The minds of the other nine Dharma realms are likewise. This is called the foundation of mindfulness of mind.
Next contemplate the aggregates of perception and formation within Dharma-nature as Dharmas arising through conditions. Thus one seed is every seed and one formation is immeasurable formations. Because Dharma-nature is empty, every formation is one formation and one emptiness is every emptiness. Because Dharma-nature is provisional, one formation is every formation and one provisionality is every provisionality. Because Dharma-nature is the Middle, it is neither one nor all, neither empty nor provisional yet illuminating both emptiness and provisionality. The formations of the other nine Dharma realms are immediately empty, provisional, and the Middle in the same way. This is called the foundation of mindfulness of Dharmas.
The power and function of these foundations of mindfulness are vast. Their meaning includes both Great and Small; they break the eight inversions together, reveal withering and flourishing together, and are also beyond both withering and flourishing, entering parinirvāṇa in their midst. They are also called sitting at the site of awakening, the Great Vehicle, and the Dharma realm.
The Eight Inversions, Withering and Flourishing, and the Midst
How exactly do the foundations of mindfulness encompass such extensive meanings?
The form of Dharma-nature is in reality not pure, yet ordinary beings arbitrarily reckon it pure; this is inversion. In reality it is also not impure, yet followers of the Two Vehicles arbitrarily reckon it impure; this too is inversion. Now contemplate the seed of form as immediately empty, so every form is immediately empty. Since there is no purity in emptiness, how could attachment to it arise? This breaks the ordinary being’s inversion of reckoning purity and fulfills the withered foundation of mindfulness. The seed of form is immediately provisional, so every form is immediately provisional; distinctions of names and marks are inexhaustible. Provisional wisdom remains constantly pure and is not defiled by lack of knowledge or delusions innumerable as dust and sand. How could one remain in emptiness, choose the extinction of body and knowledge, and declare form definitely impure? This breaks the Two Vehicles’ inversion of reckoning impurity and fulfills the flourishing foundation of mindfulness. In this way all eight inversions are broken together, and the withered and flourishing foundations are established together.
Next contemplate the original limit of form as neither empty nor provisional; every form is likewise neither empty nor provisional. Because it is not empty, it is not the inversion of impurity. Because it is not provisional, it is not the inversion of purity. Because it is not the inversion of purity, it is not the flourishing tree; because it is not the inversion of impurity, it is not the withered tree. Neither withered nor flourishing means neither extreme. Where there is no extreme, neither is there some separate middle; only this is called the midst. The Buddha enters this principle, and it is therefore called nirvāṇa, which is neither pure nor impure. The nonarising of the eight inversions is called nirvāṇa, and such nirvāṇa is called the secret treasury. The Buddha places all his children in the secret treasury and dwells there himself; hence it is called entry.
The feeling of Dharma-nature is originally not pleasant, yet ordinary beings arbitrarily reckon it pleasant; this is inversion. In reality it is also not painful, yet followers of the Two Vehicles arbitrarily reckon it painful. Now contemplate the seed of feeling as immediately empty, so every feeling is empty. There is no pleasure in emptiness; how could defiled attachment arise? The ordinary being’s inversion is broken, and the withered foundation of mindfulness is fulfilled. The seed of feeling is immediately provisional, so every feeling is provisional. Receiving every feeling through nonreception, one does not become disgusted or afraid when distinguishing name and reputation. How could one reject them and sink into emptiness and extinction? The Two Vehicles’ inversion is broken, and the flourishing foundation of mindfulness is fulfilled. This is the simultaneous breaking of the two inversions and establishment of withering and flourishing.
Next contemplate the original limit of feeling as neither empty nor provisional. Because it is not empty, it is not withered; because it is not provisional, it is not flourishing. The nonarising of inverted extremes is called nirvāṇa, and the appearance of the principle of their midst is called the secret treasury, just as explained above, and so forth.
The mind of Dharma-nature is originally not permanent, yet ordinary beings arbitrarily reckon it permanent; this is the inversion of permanence. In reality Dharma-nature is also not impermanent, yet followers of the Two Vehicles arbitrarily reckon it impermanent. Now contemplate the seed of mind as immediately empty, so every mind is immediately empty. There is no permanence in emptiness; how could one say that mind continues from thought to thought? This breaks the ordinary being’s inversion of permanence and fulfills the withered foundation of mindfulness. Mind is a provisional designation, so every mind is also provisional. If mind could only be said to be impermanent, how could immeasurable marks of mind be distinguished? This breaks the Two Vehicles’ inversion of impermanence and fulfills the flourishing foundation of mindfulness.
Next contemplate mind as immediately neither empty nor provisional. Because it is not empty, it is not impermanent; because it is not provisional, it is not permanent. Neither flourishing nor withered, with inverted extremes not arising, is called entry into nirvāṇa. The appearance of the principle of the Middle Way is called the secret treasury. The Buddha places all his children there and enters it himself, and so forth.
The Dharmas of Dharma-nature originally do not possess a self, yet ordinary beings arbitrarily reckon there is a self. They originally are also not without self, yet followers of the Two Vehicles arbitrarily reckon there is no self. Now contemplate Dharma-nature as immediately empty, so all Dharmas are empty. There is no self in emptiness; this breaks the ordinary being’s inversion of self and fulfills the withered foundation of mindfulness. Dharma-nature is immediately provisional, so all Dharmas are established through provisionality, freely and without obstruction, fully possessing the meaning of “self.” This breaks the Two Vehicles’ inversion of no-self and fulfills the flourishing foundation of mindfulness. Next contemplate the original limit of Dharmas as neither empty nor provisional. Because it is not empty, it is not no-self; because it is not provisional, it is not self. The nonarising of inverted extremes is called entry into nirvāṇa, and the appearance of the principle of their midst is called the secret treasury.
There are four Dharma medicines for treating inversion. Contemplative wisdom of Dharma-nature is called mindfulness, and one truth immediately being three truths is called a foundation. Everything is immediately empty, so all inversions and all withering and flourishing are quiescent. Everything is immediately provisional, so both twin trees of the two extremes are established. Everything is immediately the Middle, so no Dharma is anything but the Dharma realm. It is only one thought-moment, yet it is this vast and profound.
If one can deeply contemplate the foundations of mindfulness, that itself is sitting at the site of awakening, is the Great Vehicle, and is entering parinirvāṇa between the twin trees. Beginning and end are already complete, and no remaining Dharma need be cultivated. If entry still does not occur, one advances to cultivate the remaining factors of the path.
The Four Right Efforts and Four Bases of Spiritual Power
Diligently contemplating the four foundations of mindfulness is called the four right efforts. The delusions of views and thought have already arisen and are therefore called evils already arisen. Contemplate them as immediately empty so that evils already arisen do not arise again, and therefore apply diligent effort. Delusions innumerable as dust and sand and the delusion of ignorance have not yet appeared and are therefore called evils not yet arisen. Contemplate them as immediately provisional and immediately the Middle so that evils not yet arisen do not arise, and therefore apply diligent effort. Practitioners exert all their strength and sincerity in cultivating the four kinds of samādhi, checking these two kinds of evil.
Wisdom of all dharmas is called goodness already arisen. This goodness arises more easily, so the path to nirvāṇa is said to be easily attained. Wisdom of the varieties of the path and wisdom of all modes are called goodness not yet arisen; such discriminating wisdom is more difficult to produce. Once the wisdom of emptiness has arisen, one diligently causes it to increase. Since wisdom of the Middle has not yet arisen, one causes it to develop. The three contemplations continue without interruption solely to produce these two kinds of wisdom. The four right efforts can themselves cause awakening to the path; hence wholehearted, diligent effort attains the three awakenings, and no further Dharma need be cultivated.
If entry still does not occur, effort must be insufficient and the mind too scattered and agitated. One must therefore enter wholesome quiescence and carefully contemplate mind-nature; this is called superior concentration. Within superior concentration, cultivate the four bases of spiritual power of aspiration, diligence, mind, and contemplation.
The base of spiritual power of aspiration is single-mindedly tending toward the Dharma being cultivated and is also called adorning that Dharma. Contemplative wisdom within meditative concentration resembles a lamp in a sealed room: whatever it illuminates becomes clearly understood. Because it illuminates and understands, the formation of severance is accomplished and the base of aspiration is cultivated to completion.
The base of spiritual power of diligence is accomplishing the Dharma being cultivated. Dharma-nature is originally unmoving, yet within quiescence practitioners apply diligence continuously, without interruption or admixture. Thus the formation of severance is accomplished and the base of diligence is cultivated to completion.
The base of spiritual power of mind is correctly abiding in contemplation of the Dharma being cultivated, taking it as object within one mind. When mind is controlled in one place, nothing remains unaccomplished. Thus the formation of severance is accomplished and the base of mind is cultivated to completion.
The base of spiritual power of contemplation is skillfully distinguishing the Dharma being cultivated and its preparatory means. One contemplates in this way without allowing the mind to move or scatter. Because contemplation occurs within meditative concentration, the formation of severance is accomplished and the base of contemplation is cultivated to completion.
Cultivating this way, one enters through the concentrated mind and needs no other Dharma. If entry still does not occur, one should cultivate the five faculties.
The Five Faculties and Five Powers
Faith that the principle of the three truths is the mother of the buddhas of the three times can produce all ten powers, fearlessnesses, liberations, and samādhis. Cultivating only the foundations of mindfulness and seeking no Dharma outside them is called the faculty of faith.
The faculty of diligence means that faith gathers in all Dharmas; because one faithfully accepts them, one redoubles vigorous effort.
The faculty of mindfulness means attending only to the direct path and the assisting path and allowing no deviance or falsity to enter. Moreover, because this Dharma is cultivated through diligence, one does not forget or lose it; it is therefore called the faculty of mindfulness.
The faculty of concentration is practicing diligence with one mind quiescent and concentrated. Moreover, because this Dharma is gathered in by mindfulness, it is neither forgotten nor lost and does not waver; it is therefore called the faculty of concentration.
The faculty of wisdom is the wisdom of the foundations of mindfulness gathered in by the Dharma of concentration. Its intrinsic nature inwardly sees for itself and does not know through another; it is therefore called the faculty of wisdom.
Cultivating only the five faculties can also lead one into the path and accomplish the Great Vehicle. If entry still does not occur, one further cultivates the five powers, causing the five faculties to increase. Because they can check the various afflictions, they are called powers.
The power of faith can break every doubt, and nothing can shake it. The power of diligence can remove indolence, so everything is accomplished according to one’s original vows. The power of mindfulness can break deviant thinking and is not damaged by afflictions.
The power of concentration can break distraction and remain far from clamor. Even when one speaks, it does not obstruct the first dhyāna. Skillfully dwelling in initial and sustained application does not obstruct the second dhyāna. The mind’s production of joy does not obstruct the third dhyāna. Teaching and transforming beings does not obstruct the fourth dhyāna. A Dharma that obstructs one of the four dhyānas does not obstruct all the other concentrations. Practitioners neither abandon meditative concentration nor drift along with it; this is called the power of concentration.
The power of wisdom can break deviant attachment. Every attachment and every wisdom are fully illuminated together; this is called the power of wisdom. These five powers are all called the Great Vehicle. If entry still does not occur, use the seven factors of awakening to balance and regulate the mind.
The Seven Factors of Awakening and the Noble Eightfold Path
When the mind is buoyant, use the factor of tranquility to remove coarseness of body and speech, the factor of equanimity to relinquish attachment to contemplative wisdom, and the factor of concentration to bring the mind into dhyāna. When the mind sinks, use the factors of diligence, investigation of Dharmas, and joy to arouse it. The factor of mindfulness encompasses both buoyancy and sinking. Cultivating these seven factors enables entry into the path. The Great Treatise says that after one has left the five hindrances and single-mindedly cultivated the seven factors of awakening, it is impossible not to enter. If entry still does not occur, cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path.
First use the supramundane and highest grade of correct view to contemplate the principle of the three truths; then activate this contemplation through correct intention. Speaking according to the true mark of Dharma so that both oneself and others benefit is correct speech.
Black karma brings black recompense, white karma white recompense, mixed karma mixed recompense, and neither-white-nor-black karma neither-white-nor-black recompense; explained through the Small Vehicle, this is easy to understand. Here, however, sinking into emptiness is black karma, entering provisionality is white karma, practicing emptiness and provisionality together is mixed karma, and the Middle Way is neither-white-nor-black karma; all of these are called wrong livelihood. If the karma one performs can exhaust all karma, it is called correct action; acting according to it is likewise called correct action. Correct action is not drawn by either extreme, emptiness or existence.
When others gain benefit, the mind does not burn with distress; regarding one’s own gain, one remains content and knows when to stop. This is correct livelihood. Skillfully entering the correct truth is called correct effort. When mind is not shaken or dispossessed by objects but remains upright and does not forget, this is correct mindfulness. Abiding in correct Dharma with unwavering certainty is called correct concentration. Through this Noble Eightfold Path, one can enter true principle. The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra says that anyone able to cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path can obtain ghee.
These factors of the path are not established relative to sequential stages; they can be complete when a beginner contemplates the principle of Dharma-nature. The meaning of the Great Treatise is this: four kinds of diligence within the four foundations of mindfulness are called the four right efforts; four kinds of concentrated mind are called the four bases of spiritual power; the arising of five wholesome roots is called the faculties; the increase of those roots is called the powers; distinguishing the function of the path of the four foundations is called awakening; and traveling securely in the path of the four foundations is called the Noble Eightfold Path.
Thus beginners practicing the path can use the thirty-seven factors to nurture and regulate calming-and-contemplation and the four kinds of samādhi, entering the bodhisattva stages. These factors are a proximate cause of great nirvāṇa; the other kinds of factors are called remote causes, and so forth.
The Tree of the Path Flowers and Bears Fruit
A simile now reveals this meaning. A seed is planted in the earth; the tip of a sprout first splits open, roots grow downward, branches and leaves spread upward, flowers bloom in profusion, and finally fruit is produced.
Dharma-nature and the Dharma realm resemble the earth; contemplation of the foundations of mindfulness resembles the seed; the four right efforts resemble the emerging sprout; the five faculties resemble roots growing downward; the five powers resemble the growth of stems and leaves; the seven factors of awakening resemble flowering; and the Noble Eightfold Path resembles bearing fruit. The fruit is entry into the copper-wheel stage and realization of the tolerance of nonarising. It is also called reaching the place of jewels, entering the secret treasury, obtaining ghee, seeing buddha-nature, or the manifestation of the Dharma body and buddhahood through the eight marks. The statement that the factors of the path are good spiritual friends through which correct awakening is accomplished concerns precisely this.
Explained more generally through the tree of the path, the Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra expressly says that escaping the three evil destinations is benefit of leaves, obtaining a human or celestial body is benefit of flowers, and obtaining the four fruits of the path is benefit of fruit; this explanation leans toward contemplation of emptiness. Escaping the ground of the Two Vehicles is benefit of leaves, obtaining a body of transformational superknowledge is benefit of flowers, and fully possessing wisdom of the varieties of the path is benefit of fruit; this leans toward contemplation of provisionality. Escaping the bonds of the two extremes, emptiness and existence, is benefit of leaves, receiving a body of Dharma-nature is benefit of flowers, and realizing buddha-nature is benefit of fruit; this leans toward contemplation of the Middle. Explained generally through the three contemplations, immediate emptiness is benefit of leaves, immediate provisionality benefit of flowers, and immediate Middle benefit of fruit, and so forth.
The Three Samādhis and Three Gates of Liberation
Moreover, practicing the thirty-seven factors of the path brings one near the uncontaminated city. The city’s domain has three gates. Entering them can produce true uncontaminated wisdom: the gate of emptiness, gate of signlessness, and gate of nonaction. They are also called the three gates of liberation and the three samādhis.
If one enters meditative concentration through correct view and correct intention and then produces uncontaminated wisdom from concentration, the wisdom of correct view is called the chief minister and correct concentration the great king. Because concentration is primary in this relation, these are called the three samādhis. “Without wisdom, meditative concentration cannot be established” has precisely this meaning.
If correct view arises from correct concentration and uncontaminated wisdom then arises from correct view, correct concentration is the chief minister and wisdom the great king. Because wisdom is primary in this relation, these are called the three liberations. “Without meditative concentration, wisdom cannot be established” has precisely this meaning.
One may also say that the three samādhis belong to the path of suppression, while the liberations belong to the paths of severance and realization. Or one may say that meditative concentration and wisdom unite, so samādhi itself is liberation and liberation itself is samādhi.
According to the Tripiṭaka Teaching, the two practices of emptiness and no-self under the truth of suffering are the gate of emptiness; the four practices under the truth of cessation are the gate of signlessness; the eight practices under the truths of origination and the path, together with the other two practices under suffering, are the gate of nonaction. Within the sixteen practices, wisdom and meditative concentration alternately being king and minister can be inferred accordingly, and so forth.
According to the Shared Teaching, seeing suffering and origination as both illusory transformations is the gate of emptiness. An old recension of the Great Treatise said that if one contemplates extremely subtle form, there are eighteen emptinesses; the recension then current said that if one contemplates one end of cloth, there are eighteen emptinesses. Cloth is provisional designation, while extremely subtle form is a real Dharma; this is the difference between the two recensions. If one understands their purport, both provisional and real Dharmas are empty.
If one has not yet entered emptiness, emotional imaginings and conceptual proliferation arise, and one clings to a mark of emptiness. Knowing that emptiness itself has no mark of emptiness is called the gate of signlessness. Although the mark of emptiness is empty, if one still clings to the wisdom that contemplates, grasping remains. Once neither what contemplates nor what is contemplated exists, who ultimately performs the contemplation of emptiness? This is called the gate of nonaction. Since there is no agent, who could produce an aspiration? It is therefore also called wishlessness. The relation of meditative concentration and wisdom as king and minister within the Shared Teaching’s three samādhis can be inferred accordingly, and so forth.
According to the Distinct Teaching, entering emptiness from provisionality and realizing the true truth is called the samādhi of emptiness. The Two Vehicles realize only this emptiness and retain its mark. Bodhisattvas know that emptiness is not fixed emptiness, so they enter the provisional to teach and transform beings and no longer retain a mark of emptiness; this is called the samādhi of signlessness. They then advance to cultivate the Middle Way, retaining neither a mark of the Middle nor of the extremes and seeking neither Middle nor extremes; this is called the samādhi of nonaction. The relation of wisdom and meditative concentration as king and minister within the three contemplations of the Distinct Teaching can be inferred accordingly, and so forth.
Speaking specifically according to the Distinct Teaching’s entry into the provisional, distinguishing immeasurable medicines and illnesses is entirely provisional designation. Provisional designations have no real substance and are empty because they have no substance; this is called the gate of emptiness. Emptiness itself has no mark of emptiness, so how much less could there be a provisional mark? It is therefore called the gate of signlessness. Since emptiness and provisionality are both markless, one does not aspire to know illnesses or recognize medicines; it is therefore called wishlessness. The relation of wisdom and meditative concentration as king and minister within wisdom entering the provisional can be inferred accordingly, and so forth.
According specifically to the Perfect Teaching, although the names are the same as above, the meanings are entirely different. The meaning of the Great Treatise is that śrāvakas cultivate the three liberations taking emptiness as object, while bodhisattvas cultivate them taking the true mark of all dharmas as object. A wise person sees emptiness and nonemptiness simultaneously; this emptiness and nonemptiness are also called the Middle Way. Seeing this emptiness is seeing buddha-nature.
The Two Vehicles contemplate eighteen kinds of events in a dream. Internal events in the dream cannot be obtained and are called emptiness of internal Dharmas. Events outside the dream cannot be obtained and are called emptiness of external Dharmas. This continues until all eighteen kinds of existence in the dream cannot be obtained; these are called the eighteen emptinesses.
Perfect contemplation now takes as unobtainable the Dharma of sleep itself on which dreaming depends. There are no internal Dharmas within sleep, and all the internal Dharmas produced from sleep are likewise unobtainable; this is emptiness of internal Dharmas, and all Dharmas tend toward this internal emptiness. There are no external Dharmas within sleep, and all the external Dharmas produced from sleep are likewise unobtainable; this is emptiness of external Dharmas, and all Dharmas tend toward this external emptiness. This continues until all eighteen kinds of existence within the Dharma of sleep are unobtainable; these are called the eighteen emptinesses. All Dharmas tend toward the eighteen emptinesses, and passing through the eighteen kinds of object is called the eighteen emptinesses, although in reality there is only one emptiness.
The meaning of a Vaipulya scripture is that great emptiness and small emptiness both return to one emptiness. One emptiness is the true mark of Dharma-nature, the real Dharma of all buddhas; the Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra calls it solitary emptiness. Just as the four alternatives of ignorance contemplated earlier were all unobtainable, one emptiness is every emptiness and no differentiated marks of four gates are seen. Since it is neither cultivation through conditions nor true cultivation, both what contemplates and what is contemplated are unobtainable and no agent can be established. The relation of wisdom and meditative concentration as king and minister within the Perfect Teaching can be inferred accordingly, and so forth.
Such emptiness is immediately signlessness and nonaction and is also all Dharmas; all Dharmas are likewise. One should therefore know that one gate of liberation is the three gates, and the three gates are one gate. Moreover, one cultivates the three liberations within each of the four gates without mutual obstruction. The meaning of these three gates is not sequential.
Although the Distinct Teaching cultivates sequentially, all its gates still take the true mark as object. It differs from the Shared Teaching, which takes only the principle of emptiness as object, and differs still more from the Tripiṭaka Teaching, which takes wisdom concerning the four truths as object. One should therefore know that every section of the three liberations and factors of the path differs and must be skillfully distinguished.
A Lifetime of Teaching and the Midst of the Twin Trees
The Avataṃsaka Sūtra resembles the rising sun first illuminating high mountains and predominantly presents the four flourishing trees. The Tripiṭaka Teaching at Deer Park predominantly presents the four withered trees. The Vaipulya and Prajñā periods mostly regulate the four withered so that practitioners enter the four flourishing, guiding the Small Vehicle back toward the Great. At the Crane Grove, the teaching and transformation of a lifetime are complete, and the Buddha enters nirvāṇa amid flourishing and withering. Those with extremely dull faculties who are difficult to transform finally complete the path only at the twin trees; those with sharp faculties and clear understanding can enter everywhere.
Śāriputra and the others, for example, entered the secret treasury and saw buddha-nature in the Lotus Sūtra. The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra therefore points from afar to the eight thousand śrāvakas who had received predictions of buddhahood in the Lotus, like autumn harvest and winter storage, with nothing else left to do. According to this round of teaching and transformation, they had long since completed the task and did not need to wait for the assembly of the Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra.
The sūtra also asks who can adorn the twin śāla trees, immediately names six people including Śāriputra, and separately names the Tathāgata. One able to see buddha-nature can adorn the twin trees and enter nirvāṇa in their midst. Since Śāriputra and the other five could adorn the twin trees, how could they not have seen buddha-nature or entered nirvāṇa in their midst? If even śrāvakas are so, one can understand that bodhisattvas enter everywhere.
Entering nirvāṇa brings the five liberations to fulfillment. The five liberations are not themselves the six Dharmas, yet neither are they separate from them. They fully possess the meaning of the three buddha-natures, and so forth.
路上最難辨認的障礙,往往不是迎面而來的牆,而是那條看來已經走通的路。《摩訶止觀》把識通塞放在破法遍之後,正因行者可能已會觀空、會破執,卻又愛著這份能破的智慧;能破一旦被執取,也就和所破一樣成了塞。
於是第五乘不只問什麼是塞,更問什麼叫通、通會不會再翻成塞。第六乘緊接著也不另換題目:既已知道路通塞,身心的行法怎樣調到恰好,才不致浮沉失度?前一乘如導師識路,後一乘如釀者調味;一個辨方向,一個調步伐,都是初心當下的事。
通與塞,難道不是一眼就能分辨嗎
不一定。明顯的貪著、邪見、煩惱當然是塞;可是愛著觀空智慧,也同樣是塞。當能破的智慧被執取,它和所破的惑便站到同一邊,必須連能破也再加檢驗。若觀智不被執著,才可只破塞而保存通。
本論用兩幅意象把分寸說得很準。治眼病是為除膜、養珠,不能因除膜而傷明珠;討伐是為破賊、護將,不能因破賊而連良將也毀掉。識通塞不是把一切都破成空白,而是在每一次破除中知道什麼應去、什麼應護。
因此,識通塞也叫知得失、知字非字。通塞約理解說,得失約實行說,字非字約教法說。聽得正、分別得正、對緣理解得正,還要真正覺了何處通、何處塞;若只偶然得到三觀的名字,像蟲蛀木頭恰好留下字形,蟲本身並不識字。名稱、理解與實行必須互相照應。
五百由旬,究竟是五段什麼路
五百由旬出自化城險道的譬喻,卻不能拿一條單線硬套。本論檢討六種舊解:有人配地位,有人配生死種類,有人把三界與二乘接成五百,有人配五住煩惱,也有人只數思惑、塵沙、無明。每一說都抓到一個面向,卻不能同時會合五百、三百處化城、二乘共入城等經義。這就像拿一孔的匙去開三齒之鎖,匙並非全無形狀,只是對不上完整鎖齒。
智者因此不立一條唯一配法,而作三番五百。從生死處所看,三界果報是三百,方便有餘土是四百,實報無礙土是五百。從煩惱看,見惑、五下分結、五上分結、塵沙、無明,依次成五百。從觀智看,空觀知三百,假觀知四百,中觀知五百。處所是所歷,煩惱是所斷,觀智是能知;三面合看,導師才真正知道險道通塞。
這一改讀還解開《大智度論》兩段看似不同的配法。以二乘為四百,是依通教把三界外涅槃視為極處;以二乘為一百,則從出假菩薩離開二乘涅槃、再入三界說。數字沒有被勉強抹平,而是各自回到它所依的觀法。
位次那麼遙遠,初心怎樣檢查腳下這一步
若把通塞只放在多劫以後的聖位,初心連見惑尚未斷,便無從用功。所以本論把路重新拉回每一念,分成橫、竪兩面。
橫向同時檢查三種結構:苦、集是塞而道、滅是通;無明十二因緣是塞而無明滅是通;六蔽覆心是塞而六度是通。竪向則看三重進路:見思與分段生死是塞,從假入空是通;無知與方便生死是塞,從空入假是通;無明與因緣生死是塞,中道正觀是通。
只有橫列或竪列都不夠,還須橫織竪。修入空觀時,要在每一心、每一能觀、每一所觀中辨諦、緣、度;修出假觀時,對病、藥、授藥也作同樣檢校;修中觀時,面對無明、法性、真緣,仍不能省去這一步。空、假、中不是三張通行證,每一觀都可能在諦、緣、度上起塞,也都需要破塞養通。
最容易漏掉的是能觀本身。所觀之見即空,能體達它的心也即空;阿羅漢之心尚名無漏五陰,初心未真之觀,怎能被當作不屬五陰的純粹智慧?一旦把能觀計為實有,結、業、生死又由此生起。所觀要查,能觀也要查,識通塞才不是只向外找錯。
空、假、中已經具足,為什麼仍說不合所用
因為三觀若各自分張,仍留下通塞。竪看時,前兩觀在自身範圍是通,望向上一觀又成塞;最後一觀勝過下觀是通,與較小法隔開又成塞。橫看時,每一觀在當分是通,彼此不能相收便是塞。
本論以徒步、乘馬、神通作譬。徒步和乘馬都須選通路、避障礙;神通飛行時,山壁如虛空,似乎已無路可選。但若把三者分作三段,仍是三義分張。真正要處理的,不是把腳程換得越來越快,而是那顆心是否仍把三觀切成互不相入的三條路。
一心三觀破竪向的分隔,三觀一心破橫向的分隔。空當下具空、假、中,便不只是一段徒步;假當下具空、假、中,便不只是一程乘馬;中當下具空、假、中,連對神通無礙的執取也不留下。一心能即空、即假、即中,山河石壁、眾魔群道都如虛空,不必離低攀高,也不必避山走谷,觸處都可通達寶所。
這不是把空、假、中混成一句口號。每一法、每一能、每一所仍須具體檢查,每一處都要看諦、緣、度是否即空、即假、即中。一心不是省略分別,而是使所有分別不再彼此封閉。
既然無塞,還需要說通嗎
不需要另立一個通。通是對塞而說;若所觸之處都如虛空,塞不可得,通也無從單獨成立。但『無通無塞』本身若被握成新見解,苦、集、無明與障蔽便會在這裡再生。原來能越山壁的神通會失去,連乘馬、徒步的能力也一併失去。
所以無通無塞不是停止檢校,而是雙照通塞。面對一法、一能、一所,既不把塞固定為實物,也不把通據為所得;有塞便破,有通便養,連對破與養的執著也照見。這也解釋了四個交錯問題:橫塞從粗看可以障竪通,竪通也似乎能治橫塞;細分時,橫塞近而不能塞深遠的竪通,橫通力弱而不能通竪塞,竪塞不必成橫障,竪通也只對治自己相應的塞。回答隨觀察層次而變,不可拿一往之說封死二往分別。
已經破法遍,為什麼還要調道品
因為知道方向,不等於身心已調得能走。破法遍與識通塞之後,若三十七品沒有調停,仍難迅速與真法相應。有漏道品在初心作無漏方便,方便若失去分寸,真理便難會入。
釀酒的譬喻正說這個『適』字。酵的暖度恰好,水才變成酒;麴、糵過與不及,味都不成。道品也不是項目湊齊便有效,而要知道何時生起、怎樣承接、浮沉時如何互調。
本論先列四種組織。當分,是念處、正勤、如意足、根、力、覺、道每一品都可在自身當分得道。相攝,是念處能攝餘品,餘品也能攝念處。約位,是把七科分配煖、頂、忍、世第一、見道、修道等位。這三種都能說明道品,卻還不是調停。只有相生,從念處生正勤,正勤發如意足,如意足生五根,五根生五力,五力生七覺,七覺入八正,才顯出善巧調適。
道品也不是二乘專有。若一套三十七品是涅槃因,依四種道諦、十六門展開,便有無量三十七助菩提法而成大涅槃因;這不是在道品之外另造一套法,正如四諦之外沒有第五諦。道品可說正道,也可說助道;可在欲界、未到定、初禪作有漏方便,也可在見諦思惟中成無漏行。名稱隨位與作用而變,所調的仍是這三十七品。
三十七品很多,初心要從哪一品開始
從四念處開始,卻不是把其餘三十三品留待很遠以後。本論只廣明無作道諦的三十七品,先用一念心攝十法界陰入。法性因緣生,所以一種能是一切種;法性空,所以一切色受心法都不可固著;法性假,所以一色一切色、一受一切受、一心一切心、一行無量行;法性中,所以既不固定為一,也不割裂為一切,而雙照一與一切。身、受、心、法四念處,每一處都即空、即假、即中。
大地能生種種芽,是這一觀的核心意象。卉木叢林雖多,大地不因此分裂成許多地;十法界的色心雖無量,也不妨礙一念法性。反過來,大地是一,也不使芽葉失去各自形色。一切種與一種、一切法與一念心,在這裡不是彼此取消,而是互相通達。
四念處又同時破凡夫、二乘八倒。以身念處為例,法性之色不是固定的淨,凡夫計淨,便由即空破其染著,成枯念處;法性之色也不是固定的不淨,二乘計不淨,便由即假破其滯空灰滅,成榮念處。再觀色非空非假,便非淨、非不淨,非榮、非枯,離開兩邊,也不另立一個中點,這才叫雙樹中間。
受的苦樂倒、心的常無常倒、法的我無我倒,都依同一結構觀察。即空使諸倒與榮枯空寂,即假使兩邊雙樹都能成立,即中使一切皆是法界。治倒的法藥共有四種,能觀的法性觀智名為念,所觀的一諦即三諦名為處;只一念心,作用便如此廣遠。若能由此進入,始終具足,不須另修餘法;若仍未入,才展轉調下一品。
一品未入,下一品怎樣接手
不是宣判前一品失敗,而是看見當下偏差,再以後一品調整。勤觀念處就是四正勤:使已生見思惡不再生,使未生塵沙無明惡不生;使已生空智增長,使未生的道種智、一切種智開發。若心仍散動,就入善寂,在上定中修四如意足。
欲如意足使心專向所修法,精進如意足使修習無間無雜,心如意足使一心正住,思惟如意足善分別方便而不動散。若定心仍未入,五根接手:信三諦,倍策精進,只念正助,不忘不動,內性自照。根若仍弱,再修五力,使信破疑、進破懈怠、念破邪想、定破散亂、慧破邪執。
若心浮動,七覺以除、捨、定使它沉靜;若心沉沒,以精進、擇法、喜使它振起;念通持浮沉兩面。若仍未入,再用八正道:正見觀三諦,正思惟發觀,正語使自他俱益,正業不被二邊牽引,正命對他利不惱、於己利知足,正精進善入正諦,正念不動不忘,正定安住決定。
這個次第最後又回到四念處。四念處中的四種精進就是四正勤,四種定心就是四如意足;善根生起叫根,根增長叫力,分別念處之道用叫覺,安穩行於念處之道叫八正。七科不是七件拼裝零件,而是同一觀法在勤、定、增長、調停與安行中的不同名字。
道樹譬把這條生長線畫得更清楚。法性法界是地,念處是種,正勤是芽,五根向下生根,五力如莖葉上布,七覺如花開,八正如果實成熟。果成便到寶所、入祕密藏、見佛性。根、莖、花、果各有時節,卻從未離開同一大地與種子。
無漏城有三門,應從定入還是從慧入
兩路都可。三十七品將行者帶到無漏城,城有空、無相、無作三門,又名三解脫門、三三昧。若由正見、正思惟入定,再從定發無漏,智慧如大臣,正定如大王,因此從定立名三三昧。若由正定生正見,再從正見發無漏,定如大臣,智慧如大王,因此從慧立名三解脫。也可依伏道與斷證道分,也可因定慧相合而說三昧即解脫、解脫即三昧。
三門在不同觀法中意義不同。三藏依四諦十六行分空、無相、無作;通教先觀苦集如幻即空,再連空相與能觀也遣;別教從空出假,再進中道,或於無量病藥中明空、無相、無願;圓觀則緣諸法實相,空與不空都名中道。
夢與睡眠的譬喻顯出差別。只在夢中逐一找十八種事不可得,仍是就所生事物說十八空;圓觀連生夢的睡眠法也不可得,從它所生的一切內外法隨之不可得。十八空不是十八個封閉空室,而都歸法性實相的一空。一空即三門,三門即一門;每一門又都具三解脫,互不妨礙。
利根處處得入,為什麼還要一路走到雙樹
因為施化有不同時節。《華嚴》如日先照高山,偏顯四榮;鹿苑偏顯四枯;方等、般若調枯入榮,引小歸大;到鶴林雙樹,施化已足,佛在榮枯中間入涅槃。極鈍難化者直到最後才完成,利根明悟者卻可處處得入。
八千聲聞在《法華經》中受記作佛,如秋收冬藏,這一番教化已經完成,不必等到雙樹。舍利弗等六人也能莊嚴雙樹;既能莊嚴,便不能說他們未見佛性。聲聞尚可處處入,菩薩更可知。路有施化先後,入口卻不被最後一站壟斷。
識通塞由此與道品調適合成一條完整路線。先辨能破是否又成所破,再以橫竪檢校每一心;再看道品是否調得相生,浮沉時是否知道轉品;最後入一門而見三門、入一時而不礙諸時。善知通塞不是只會指出哪裡走不通,而是能讓每一步都回到一心三觀,使初心也真正向寶所前進。
輔行之眼
湛然先把識通塞分成橫、竪、橫別、一心四層。前文破法遍所破的是法執,這裡更細查能執;即使觀法本正,只要對能觀生著,著心便與邪執相同。所以『破塞存通』不是保留一個可據有的通,而是能破所破皆受檢校。
六家配釋之後,湛然以『今家正解』標出三番五百,並用經緯解橫織竪:竪三觀如經,橫向諦、緣、度如緯,交織才成三諦文章。入空、出假、中觀各自都要歷法、能、所,不能因已名中觀便免查通塞。
本論所引三類菩薩與三種行路譬,還有用經層次。湛然指出,三類菩薩的次序經過開分與移置;行路譬在論本原作乘羊、乘馬、神通,本論以徒步替代乘羊。這些差異顯示智者如何取義,不宜拿今本文字靜默改平。
一心段由湛然判得最緊:一心具三,破次第竪隔;三觀只是一心,破橫向分張。若又執『無通無塞』,仍是別相之塞。通塞、得失、字非字也分別約解、行、教,三名同旨而責任不同。
道品四義中,湛然只把相生判作調停,因它使七科次第調試。有漏道品作無漏方便,限在初心調停而能為初住無漏作因;正道、助道兩說都須保存,不能選一廢一。本論廣明無作三十七品,正是此段主意,其餘三種道諦暫置不展。
無作念處雖分身、受、心、法先後寫出,湛然提醒實觀不出一念;四正勤文字看來次第,意義仍是圓融。四如意足雖屬定,必須定慧均等;五根再修增長才名五力;七覺以寂照、除等、進等調停,念通持兩組;八正雖位次已極,這裡仍只說初心可修。
無作念處開端連用般若、華嚴、法華,湛然判為用後一部經展開前一部經的意思,不是三經各自重說同一句。他又以一念百界千如、三千世間收成空、假、中三諦,說明『一切種』怎樣落在現前一念。身、受、心、法雖依文字逐項展開,所觀始終沒有離開這一念,也沒有把九法界排除在佛界之外。
道樹譬中,本論由種、芽直接寫到五根,沒有明配如意足。湛然只在釋中補說莖幹上聳可譬如意足,沒有倒改正文。三三昧與三解脫的王臣配法也不可專取一說;圓門則空即無相、無作,一門即三門,但仍要先辨三藏、通、別、圓各自所緣,才不會以同名混義。
末段五時,湛然判作五味施化;雙樹則由六人與如來、五陰與五解脫,讀到三佛性及六法不即不離。這面鏡把全段的用力處收在『調』與『識』:識不是多立判斷,而是節節知道能觀是否成著;調不是另添一法,而是使已有道品在一念中浮沉得宜、展轉相生。
後來《止觀義例》以『三止三觀在一心中』與『節節檢校』概括識通塞,又以念處為道品之體;《止觀大意》則把『於通起塞便破、於塞得通便護』與七科次第調試連成一線。兩部短文都沒有另造方法,只把本段從能觀自檢到諸品相生的骨架再次顯出。
The hardest obstruction to recognize on a road is often not the wall directly ahead but the route that seems already open. The Mohe Zhiguan (Great Calming-and-Contemplation) places discerning passage and obstruction after pervasively breaking through Dharmas precisely because practitioners may already know how to contemplate emptiness and break attachment yet come to cherish the very wisdom that breaks it. Once what actively breaks is grasped, it becomes an obstruction just like what it breaks.
The fifth vehicle therefore asks not only what obstruction is but also what passage means and whether passage can turn back into obstruction. The sixth vehicle immediately continues the same question: once the road’s openings and blockages are known, how should bodily and mental practices be regulated to the proper measure so that buoyancy and sinking do not run out of balance? The first vehicle here resembles a guide who knows the route; the second, a brewer who balances flavor. One discerns direction and the other regulates the pace, and both concern the beginner’s present thought.
Are Passage and Obstruction Not Obvious at a Glance?
Not necessarily. Obvious greed, deviant views, and afflictions are certainly obstructions, but cherishing the wisdom that contemplates emptiness is an obstruction too. When the wisdom that actively breaks is grasped, it takes the same side as the delusion it breaks and must itself be examined again. Only when contemplative wisdom is not grasped can one break obstruction while preserving passage.
The treatise states this measure precisely through two images. Treating an eye disease means removing the film while nurturing the jewel; one must not damage the bright jewel while removing the film. A campaign means defeating bandits while protecting the general; one must not destroy the good general together with the bandits. Discerning passage and obstruction does not break everything into a blank. At every act of breaking it knows what should be removed and what should be protected.
Discerning passage and obstruction is therefore also called knowing gain and loss and knowing word and nonword. Passage and obstruction concern understanding; gain and loss, practice; word and nonword, teaching. One must hear correctly, distinguish correctly, understand conditions correctly, and genuinely awaken to where passage lies and where obstruction lies. Merely happening upon the names of the three contemplations resembles insects boring into wood and accidentally leaving the shapes of written words: the insects themselves do not read. Name, understanding, and practice must illuminate one another.
Five Hundred Yojanas: What Five Stretches of Road Are They?
The five hundred yojanas come from the simile of the dangerous road and phantom city, but they cannot be forced onto one linear scheme. The treatise examines six old explanations: some correlate them with stages; some with types of birth-and-death; some join the three realms to the Two Vehicles to make five hundred; some correlate them with the five abiding afflictions; and some count only the delusions of thought, dust-and-sand delusions, and ignorance. Each explanation catches one aspect but cannot simultaneously accord with the five hundred, the phantom city at the three-hundred point, the Two Vehicles entering the city together, and the other implications of the sūtra. This resembles using a key with one notch to open a lock with three teeth. The key is not wholly without shape; it simply does not match the complete lock.
Zhizhe therefore does not establish one exclusive correlation but gives three rounds of five hundred. Seen through places of birth-and-death, recompense in the three realms is three hundred, the Land of Skillful Means with Remainder four hundred, and the Land of Unobstructed Real Reward five hundred. Seen through afflictions, delusions of views, the five lower fetters, the five higher fetters, dust-and-sand delusions, and ignorance successively form the five hundreds. Seen through contemplative wisdom, contemplation of emptiness knows three hundred, contemplation of provisionality four hundred, and contemplation of the Middle five hundred. Places are what is traversed, afflictions what is severed, and contemplative wisdom what knows. Only by seeing all three sides together does the guide truly know the passage and obstruction of the dangerous road.
This rereading also resolves two apparently different correlations in the Great Treatise. Counting the Two Vehicles as four hundred follows the Shared Teaching in regarding nirvāṇa beyond the three realms as the utmost point. Counting them as one hundred instead speaks from the standpoint of bodhisattvas entering the provisional, who leave the nirvāṇa of the Two Vehicles and reenter the three realms. The numbers are not forcibly flattened into one scheme; each returns to the contemplative method on which it depends.
If the Stages Are So Remote, How Does a Beginner Inspect This Very Step?
If passage and obstruction are placed only at noble stages many eons away, beginners who have not even severed delusions of views have no way to practice. The treatise therefore draws the road back into every thought and divides its inspection into horizontal and vertical dimensions.
Horizontally, three structures are examined at once: suffering and origination are obstruction, while the path and cessation are passage; ignorance and the twelve links of dependent origination are obstruction, while the cessation of ignorance is passage; the six obscurations covering mind are obstruction, while the six perfections are passage. Vertically, three levels of advance are examined: views and thought together with fragmentary birth-and-death are obstruction, while entering emptiness from provisionality is passage; lack of knowledge and transformational birth-and-death are obstruction, while entering provisionality from emptiness is passage; ignorance and causal birth-and-death are obstruction, while correct contemplation of the Middle Way is passage.
Neither horizontal listing nor vertical listing alone is sufficient; the horizontal must be woven through the vertical. When cultivating contemplation entering emptiness, one must distinguish truths, dependent origination, and perfections within every mind, everything that contemplates, and everything contemplated. When cultivating contemplation entering the provisional, illness, medicine, and administering medicine undergo the same inspection. When cultivating contemplation of the Middle, this step cannot be omitted in relation to ignorance, Dharma-nature, and true conditions. Emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle are not three passes granting automatic passage. Each contemplation can generate obstruction within truths, dependent origination, and perfections, and each requires breaking obstruction and nurturing passage.
What is most easily overlooked is what contemplates. The view contemplated is immediately empty, but the mind that embodies and penetrates it is immediately empty too. Even an arhat’s mind is called the uncontaminated five aggregates; how could the beginner’s not-yet-real contemplation be treated as pure wisdom outside the five aggregates? Once what contemplates is reckoned truly existent, fetters, karma, and birth-and-death arise from it again. What is contemplated must be inspected, and what contemplates must also be inspected. Only then does discerning passage and obstruction cease to mean searching outward for errors.
If Emptiness, Provisionality, and the Middle Are Complete, Why Are They Still Said Not to Fit the Intended Use?
Because the three contemplations still leave passage and obstruction when divided from one another. Seen vertically, the first two are passage within their own scope but become obstruction in relation to the contemplation above. The last surpasses the lower contemplations and is passage, yet becomes obstruction again when isolated from the lesser Dharmas. Seen horizontally, each contemplation is passage within its own division, but their inability to include one another is obstruction.
The treatise uses walking, riding a horse, and superknowledge as similes. Walking and riding both require choosing open routes and avoiding obstructions. When one flies by superknowledge, mountain walls are like empty space and there seems no route left to choose. Yet dividing the three into separate stretches still leaves three meanings dispersed. The real issue is not replacing one mode of travel with another of increasing speed, but whether the mind still cuts the three contemplations into three mutually exclusive roads.
Three contemplations in one mind break vertical separation; the three contemplations as one mind break horizontal separation. Emptiness immediately possesses emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle and is therefore not merely a stretch traveled on foot. Provisionality immediately possesses all three and is therefore not merely a stretch traveled on horseback. The Middle immediately possesses all three and does not even retain attachment to the unobstructedness of superknowledge. When one mind can immediately be empty, provisional, and the Middle, mountains, rivers, stone walls, hordes of māras, and groups following other paths are all like empty space. One need neither leave low ground to climb high nor avoid mountains to follow valleys. Every place touched opens passage to the place of jewels.
This does not blend emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle into a slogan. Every Dharma, everything that contemplates, and everything contemplated must still be concretely inspected. At every point one must see whether truths, dependent origination, and perfections are immediately empty, provisional, and the Middle. One mind does not eliminate distinctions; it prevents all distinctions from becoming closed to one another.
If There Is No Obstruction, Must Passage Still Be Spoken Of?
No separate passage need be established. Passage is spoken of relative to obstruction. If everywhere touched is like empty space, obstruction is unobtainable and passage cannot stand alone. Yet if “neither passage nor obstruction” is itself seized as a new view, suffering, origination, ignorance, and obscuration arise there again. The superknowledge that formerly crossed mountain walls is lost, and even the capacities to ride and walk are lost with it.
Neither passage nor obstruction therefore does not mean ending inspection; it means illuminating passage and obstruction together. Faced with a Dharma, what contemplates, and what is contemplated, one neither fixes obstruction as a real thing nor appropriates passage as an attainment. If there is obstruction, one breaks it; if there is passage, one nurtures it; and one illuminates even attachment to breaking and nurturing. This also explains the four intersecting questions. Seen roughly, horizontal obstruction can obstruct vertical passage, and vertical passage seems able to treat horizontal obstruction. Distinguished finely, horizontal obstruction is near and cannot block the profound and remote vertical passage; horizontal passage is weak and cannot pass through vertical obstruction; vertical obstruction need not become a horizontal barrier; and vertical passage treats only its corresponding obstruction. The answer changes with the level of observation; a first-order answer must not be used to foreclose second-order distinctions.
Having Already Pervasively Broken through Dharmas, Why Regulate the Factors of the Path?
Because knowing the direction does not mean body and mind are tuned to walk it. Even after pervasively breaking through Dharmas and discerning passage and obstruction, one still has difficulty quickly corresponding with true Dharma if the thirty-seven factors are not regulated. At the initial mind, contaminated factors serve as preparatory means for the uncontaminated. When these means lose their measure, entry into true principle becomes difficult.
The simile of brewing wine speaks precisely to this word “proper.” Water turns into wine only when the ferment has the right warmth. If yeast and malt are excessive or deficient, no flavor forms. The factors of the path likewise do not work merely because all items are present. One must know when they arise, how one succeeds another, and how they mutually regulate buoyancy and sinking.
The treatise first presents four arrangements. Individually defined means that the foundations of mindfulness, right efforts, bases of spiritual power, faculties, powers, factors of awakening, and path can each attain the path within their own scope. Mutually inclusive means that the foundations include the other factors and the other factors also include the foundations. According to stages means distributing the seven groups across warmth, summit, tolerance, foremost in the world, seeing the path, cultivating the path, and other stages. All three explain the factors but do not yet regulate them. Only mutual arising—foundations producing right efforts, right efforts activating bases of spiritual power, bases producing five faculties, faculties producing five powers, powers producing seven factors of awakening, and seven factors entering the Eightfold Path—reveals skillful regulation.
Nor are the factors exclusive to the Two Vehicles. If one set of thirty-seven is a cause of nirvāṇa, unfolding it through four kinds of the truth of the path and sixteen gates produces immeasurable sets of thirty-seven Dharmas assisting awakening, which become causes of great nirvāṇa. This does not invent a separate set outside the factors, just as there is no fifth truth outside the four truths. The factors can be called the direct path or the assisting path. They can serve as contaminated preparatory means in the desire realm, access concentration, and first dhyāna, and can become uncontaminated practice within seeing the truths and cultivation. Their names change according to stage and function; what is regulated remains these same thirty-seven factors.
With So Many Factors, Where Does a Beginner Start?
Begin with the four foundations of mindfulness, but do not leave the other thirty-three for a remote future. The treatise extensively explains only the thirty-seven factors of the nonconstructed truth of the path and first gathers the aggregates and sense fields of the ten Dharma realms within one thought-moment. Because Dharma-nature arises through conditions, one seed can be every seed. Because Dharma-nature is empty, no form, feeling, mind, or Dharma can be fixed. Because Dharma-nature is provisional, one form is every form, one feeling every feeling, one mind every mind, and one formation immeasurable formations. Because Dharma-nature is the Middle, it is fixed neither as one nor divided into all, yet illuminates one and all together. Each of the four foundations—body, feelings, mind, and Dharmas—is immediately empty, provisional, and the Middle.
The earth’s power to produce various sprouts is the central image of this contemplation. However many herbs, trees, groves, and forests there are, the earth does not divide into many earths. However immeasurable the forms and minds of the ten Dharma realms are, they do not obstruct the Dharma-nature of one thought. Conversely, the earth’s oneness does not cause sprouts and leaves to lose their respective shapes and colors. Every seed and one seed, all Dharmas and one thought-moment, do not cancel one another here but open passage into one another.
The four foundations simultaneously break the eight inversions of ordinary beings and the Two Vehicles. Take the foundation of the body. The form of Dharma-nature is not fixed purity. When ordinary beings reckon it pure, immediate emptiness breaks their defiled attachment and fulfills the withered foundation. The form of Dharma-nature is also not fixed impurity. When followers of the Two Vehicles reckon it impure, immediate provisionality breaks their stagnation in emptiness and extinction of body and knowledge, fulfilling the flourishing foundation. Contemplating form next as neither empty nor provisional makes it neither pure nor impure, neither flourishing nor withered. It leaves the two extremes without establishing another midpoint; only this is called the midst of the twin trees.
The inversions of pain and pleasure in feelings, permanence and impermanence in mind, and self and no-self in Dharmas are contemplated through the same structure. Immediate emptiness makes all inversions and all flourishing and withering quiescent. Immediate provisionality establishes both twin trees of the extremes. Immediate Middle makes everything the Dharma realm. There are four Dharma medicines for treating inversion. Contemplative wisdom of Dharma-nature, which actively contemplates, is called mindfulness; the one truth immediately being three truths, which is contemplated, is called a foundation. In only one thought-moment, its function is this vast. If one can enter through it, beginning and end are complete and no other Dharma need be cultivated. Only if one still has not entered does regulation proceed to the next factor.
If One Has Not Entered through One Factor, How Does the Next Take Over?
The transition does not declare the preceding factor a failure. It sees the present imbalance and uses the next factor to regulate it. Diligently contemplating the foundations is the four right efforts: preventing already-arisen evils of views and thought from arising again; preventing not-yet-arisen evils of dust-and-sand delusions and ignorance from arising; increasing the already-arisen wisdom of emptiness; and developing the not-yet-arisen wisdom of the varieties of the path and wisdom of all modes. If mind remains scattered and agitated, one enters wholesome quiescence and cultivates the four bases of spiritual power within superior concentration.
The base of aspiration directs mind exclusively toward the Dharma cultivated. The base of diligence makes cultivation uninterrupted and unmixed. The base of mind makes one mind abide correctly. The base of contemplation skillfully distinguishes preparatory means without moving or scattering. If the concentrated mind still has not entered, the five faculties take over: faith in the three truths, redoubled diligence, mindfulness of direct and assisting paths alone, stability without forgetting or movement, and the intrinsic nature inwardly illuminating itself. If the faculties remain weak, cultivate the five powers, so faith breaks doubt, diligence breaks indolence, mindfulness breaks deviant thinking, concentration breaks distraction, and wisdom breaks deviant attachment.
When the mind is buoyant, the seven factors use tranquility, equanimity, and concentration to settle it. When the mind sinks, diligence, investigation of Dharmas, and joy arouse it. Mindfulness holds both buoyancy and sinking. If entry still does not occur, employ the Noble Eightfold Path: correct view contemplates the three truths; correct intention activates contemplation; correct speech benefits oneself and others; correct action is not drawn by the two extremes; correct livelihood feels no distress at others’ gain and remains content with one’s own; correct effort skillfully enters the correct truth; correct mindfulness neither moves nor forgets; and correct concentration abides with certainty.
This sequence finally returns to the four foundations. Four kinds of diligence within the foundations are the four right efforts, and four kinds of concentrated mind are the four bases of spiritual power. The arising of wholesome roots is called faculties; the growth of those roots is called powers; distinguishing the path’s function within the foundations is called awakening; and traveling securely on the path of the foundations is called the Eightfold Path. The seven groups are not seven assembled parts but different names for the same contemplative Dharma as it becomes diligent, concentrated, strengthened, regulated, and secure in practice.
The tree of the path makes this line of growth still clearer. Dharma-nature and the Dharma realm are the earth, the foundations of mindfulness the seed, the right efforts the sprout, the five faculties roots growing downward, the five powers stems and leaves spreading upward, the seven factors flowers, and the Eightfold Path ripened fruit. When the fruit forms, one reaches the place of jewels, enters the secret treasury, and sees buddha-nature. Root, stem, flower, and fruit each have their season, yet none ever leaves the same earth and seed.
The Uncontaminated City Has Three Gates: Should One Enter through Concentration or Wisdom?
Both routes are possible. The thirty-seven factors bring practitioners to the uncontaminated city, whose three gates are emptiness, signlessness, and nonaction, also called the three gates of liberation and three samādhis. If one enters meditative concentration through correct view and correct intention and then produces uncontaminated wisdom from concentration, wisdom is the chief minister and correct concentration the great king; because the name is established from concentration, these are the three samādhis. If correct view arises from correct concentration and uncontaminated wisdom then arises from correct view, concentration is the chief minister and wisdom the great king; because the name is established from wisdom, these are the three liberations. They can also be distinguished as the path of suppression and the paths of severance and realization, or, because meditative concentration and wisdom unite, samādhi can be called liberation and liberation samādhi.
The three gates mean different things within different contemplative methods. The Tripiṭaka Teaching distributes emptiness, signlessness, and nonaction across the sixteen practices of the four truths. The Shared Teaching first contemplates suffering and origination as illusory and immediately empty, then dispels both the mark of emptiness and attachment to what contemplates. The Distinct Teaching enters provisionality from emptiness and then advances to the Middle Way, or explains emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness amid immeasurable illnesses and medicines. Perfect contemplation takes the true mark of all dharmas as object and calls both emptiness and nonemptiness the Middle Way.
The simile of dream and sleep reveals the difference. Searching one by one for eighteen unobtainable events within a dream still explains the eighteen emptinesses through the events produced. Perfect contemplation also finds unobtainable the very Dharma of sleep that produces the dream, so all inner and outer Dharmas produced from it become unobtainable. The eighteen emptinesses are not eighteen sealed empty rooms; all return to the one emptiness of the true mark of Dharma-nature. One emptiness is three gates and three gates are one gate; each gate further possesses all three liberations without mutual obstruction.
If Sharp Faculties Can Enter Everywhere, Why Travel All the Way to the Twin Trees?
Because teaching and transformation have different seasons. The Avataṃsaka is like the sun first illuminating high mountains and predominantly reveals the four flourishing trees. Deer Park predominantly reveals the four withered trees. The Vaipulya and Prajñā periods regulate the withered into flourishing and guide the Small back toward the Great. At the twin trees of the Crane Grove, teaching and transformation are complete and the Buddha enters nirvāṇa amid flourishing and withering. Those of extremely dull faculties who are difficult to transform complete the path only at the end, while those of sharp faculties and clear understanding can enter everywhere.
Eight thousand śrāvakas received predictions of buddhahood in the Lotus Sūtra, like autumn harvest and winter storage. This round of teaching and transformation was already complete; they did not need to wait for the twin trees. Six people including Śāriputra could also adorn the twin trees, and if they could adorn them one cannot say they had not seen buddha-nature. If even śrāvakas can enter everywhere, this is all the clearer for bodhisattvas. The road has an order of teaching and transformation, but its entrances are not monopolized by the final station.
Discerning passage and obstruction thus combines with regulating the factors of the path to form one complete route. First discern whether what actively breaks has again become what is broken, then inspect every mind through the horizontal and vertical. Next see whether the factors are regulated into mutual arising and whether one knows how to shift factors when mind floats or sinks. Finally, enter one gate and see three gates, enter one season without obstructing all seasons. Skill in knowing passage and obstruction is not merely the ability to point out where the road is blocked. It returns every step to three contemplations in one mind so that even a beginner genuinely advances toward the place of jewels.
Through the Eye of the Fuxing
Zhanran first divides discerning passage and obstruction into four levels: horizontal, vertical, horizontally distinct, and one mind. Pervasively breaking through Dharmas in the preceding passage breaks attachment to Dharmas; here, what actively grasps is examined more finely. Even when the Dharma contemplated is itself correct, once attachment arises toward what contemplates, the attached mind is identical with deviant grasping. “Breaking obstruction and preserving passage” therefore does not preserve some passage that may be possessed; both what breaks and what is broken undergo inspection.
After the six schools’ correlated explanations, Zhanran marks the three rounds of five hundred as “the correct explanation of our tradition” and explains weaving the horizontal through the vertical with warp and weft. The three vertical contemplations are warp; the horizontal truths, dependent origination, and perfections are weft. Only their interweaving forms the patterned text of the three truths. Entering emptiness, entering provisionality, and contemplating the Middle must each pass through Dharma, what contemplates, and what is contemplated. Being called contemplation of the Middle does not exempt one from inspecting passage and obstruction.
The three kinds of bodhisattva and three similes of travel cited by the treatise also involve layers of scriptural use. Zhanran points out that the order of the three kinds of bodhisattva has been divided and rearranged. In the treatise recension, the travel similes originally use riding a sheep, riding a horse, and superknowledge; the present treatise substitutes walking for riding a sheep. These differences reveal how Zhizhe takes up a text’s meaning and should not be silently flattened against the wording of current recensions.
Zhanran judges the one-mind passage most strictly. One mind possesses three, breaking sequential vertical separation; the three contemplations are only one mind, breaking horizontal dispersion. If “neither passage nor obstruction” is grasped anew, it remains an obstruction with a distinct mark. Passage and obstruction, gain and loss, and word and nonword concern understanding, practice, and teaching respectively. The three names share one purport but carry different responsibilities.
Among the four meanings of the factors of the path, Zhanran judges only mutual arising to be regulation because it tests and adjusts the seven groups in sequence. Contaminated factors serve as preparatory means for the uncontaminated; their scope is regulation at the initial mind, yet they can become a cause for the uncontaminated first abode. Both direct-path and assisting-path readings must be preserved; one cannot be chosen to eliminate the other. The extensive explanation of the thirty-seven nonconstructed factors is the direct intent of this passage, while the other three kinds of the truth of the path are provisionally set aside.
Although the nonconstructed foundations are written sequentially as body, feelings, mind, and Dharmas, Zhanran reminds the reader that actual contemplation never leaves one thought-moment. Although the wording of the four right efforts appears sequential, their meaning remains perfectly interfused. Although the four bases of spiritual power belong to concentration, concentration and wisdom must be balanced. The five faculties are called the five powers only when cultivated further and increased. The seven factors regulate through quiescent illumination, the groups of tranquility and equanimity, and the group of diligence; mindfulness holds both groups. Although the Noble Eightfold Path is the highest in sequential stage, this passage still says only that it can be cultivated by a beginner.
The opening of the nonconstructed foundations successively uses the Prajñā, Avataṃsaka, and Lotus scriptures. Zhanran judges this as unfolding the meaning of the preceding scripture through the one that follows, not three scriptures independently restating one sentence. He further gathers one thought’s hundred realms and thousand suchnesses and the three thousand worlds into the three truths of emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle, explaining how “every seed” is present in the current thought. Although body, feelings, mind, and Dharmas are unfolded one by one in the wording, what is contemplated never leaves this thought and never excludes the nine Dharma realms from the Buddha realm.
In the simile of the tree of the path, the treatise moves directly from seed and sprout to the five faculties without explicitly correlating the bases of spiritual power. Zhanran merely adds in his explanation that the upward-reaching trunk may symbolize those bases; he does not rewrite the root text. Nor may one insist on only one correlation of king and ministers for the three samādhis and three liberations. In the Perfect gates, emptiness itself is signlessness and nonaction, and one gate is three gates; nevertheless, one must first distinguish the respective objects of the Tripiṭaka, Shared, Distinct, and Perfect teachings so that identical names do not conflate different meanings.
Zhanran judges the closing five periods as teaching and transformation through the five flavors. From the six disciples and the Tathāgata, the five aggregates and five liberations at the twin trees, he reads the three buddha-natures and the neither-identical-nor-separate relation of the six Dharmas. This mirror gathers the exertion of the entire passage into “regulating” and “discerning.” Discerning does not mean multiplying judgments but knowing at every joint whether what contemplates has become attached. Regulating does not mean adding another Dharma but causing the existing factors to rise and sink appropriately and mutually arise within one thought.
The later Zhiguan Yili summarizes discerning passage and obstruction through “three calmings and three contemplations within one mind” and “inspection at every joint,” and takes the foundations of mindfulness as the substance of the factors. The Zhiguan Dayi joins “when obstruction arises within passage, break it; when passage is gained within obstruction, protect it” into one line with the sequential testing and adjustment of the seven groups. Neither short text invents another method. Both reveal again the skeleton of this passage, from self-inspection of what contemplates through the mutual arising of all the factors.
考據Apparatus
本單元合十乘中第五識通塞與第六道品調適。前半以得失、字非字兩名開通塞之義,破諸家五百由旬之配釋,立處所、煩惱、觀智三番,再由橫、竪、橫別進至一心三觀;後半列道品當分、相攝、約位、相生四義,以相生為調適,繼而展開無作四念處、四正勤、四如意足、五根、五力、七覺、八正及三解脫門。自「第五、識通塞者」〔T1911 0086a17〕起,另名『知得失』『知字非字』,至「不即六法,不離六法」〔T1911 0091a04〕,是智者說、灌頂記之正文。
一、科判定位
本單元位於十廣第七正修止觀、十境第一陰入界境之十乘觀法。前承第四破法遍,後接第七助道對治。識通塞起於卷七上正文首句〔T46 0086a17〕;道品調適的前導圈在〔T46 0087c08〕,『第六』首字前最近行錨在〔T46 0087c09〕;下一乘助道對治起於〔T46 0091a05〕。
《止觀輔行傳弘決》T1912 以「次釋通塞中先列異名。次明來意有法譬合」〔T1912 0357b05〕開第五乘正釋,以「○次明道品調適者。先通列釋四道品相」〔T1912 0361b02〕開第六乘正釋。依本論科首與《止觀輔行傳弘決》逐文對位,可分十五節:
| 節 | 本論範圍 | 內容 | 《止觀輔行傳弘決》對位 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 一 | 0086a17–0086a24 | 三異名、來意、能破亦須檢校 | 0357b05–0357c23 |
| 二 | 0086a24–0086c08 | 六家異解、三番五百 | 0358a–0359a01 |
| 三 | 0086c08–0087a18 | 橫三、竪三與橫織竪 | 0359a04–0359c09 |
| 四 | 0087a18–0087b25 | 初心三觀、三喻、一心破橫竪 | 0359c09–0360c13 |
| 五 | 0087b25–0087c08 | 三名同異與橫竪四問 | 0360c19–0361b02 |
| 六 | 0087c08–0088b12 | 道品四義、來意、大小、正助、漏無漏 | 0361b02–0362b24 |
| 七 | 0088b12–0089b07 | 無作四念處 | 0362c02–0363b15 |
| 八 | 0089b07–0089b18 | 四正勤 | 0363b17–0363b28 |
| 九 | 0089b18–0089b27 | 四如意足 | 0363b29–0363c20 |
| 十 | 0089b27–0089c08 | 五根 | 0363c21–0364a11 |
| 十一 | 0089c08–0089c16 | 五力 | 0364a12–0364b04 |
| 十二 | 0089c16–0090a12 | 七覺、八正與初心總結 | 0364b05–0364c11 |
| 十三 | 0090a12–0090a27 | 道樹譬 | 0364c12–0364c28 |
| 十四 | 0090a27–0090c20 | 三解脫門之三藏、通、別、圓 | 0364c29–0365c23 |
| 十五 | 0090c20–0091a05 | 五時、雙樹、五解脫 | 0365c25–0366c11 |
《止觀義例》T1913 以「道品中不出念處。通塞中元治能執」〔T1913 0447c25〕總攝兩乘,又說「通塞只是上二細門。以一道品調停陰入」〔T1913 0449b12〕,可見本單元既承前檢校能執,又以道品調停陰入之觀。
二、成立與傳本
本單元承緣起所誌玉泉一夏說法、智者說、灌頂記及現存傳本未完之事,其未完三重證與《止觀輔行傳弘決》所記三本、第三再治本詳見緣起單元而不另推其故,卷題夾註『上』與異讀則分別照錄於原典及目八。
三、所引經論覆核
下表依本論次第全列本單元可識別的二十八組引文、題引與場景。左欄守《摩訶止觀》原句,右欄以所屬典籍的大正藏題名、短式 T 號與今本行錨對讀;今本無同句、只有平行或所指未定者,均明記而不強繫。
識通塞
| 次 | 《摩訶止觀》原句 | 今本對讀 | 覆核 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 一 | 「大導師善知通塞,將導眾人能過五百由旬」〔T1911 0086a23〕;「《法華》過三百由旬作化城」〔T1911 0086b02〕 | 《妙法蓮華經》T262:「譬如五百由旬險難惡道,曠絕無人、怖畏之處。」〔T262 0025c26〕;「有一導師,聰慧明達,善知險道通塞之相」〔T262 0025c28〕;「過三百由旬,化作一城」〔T262 0026a04〕 | 本論撮合五百、導師與通塞;三番五百的完整配置是智者會經 |
| 二 | 「《攝大乘》人以三界為三百,方便、因緣兩生死足為五百」〔T1911 0086a27〕 | 《攝大乘論釋》T1595 有「方便生死」〔T1595 0225c24〕、「因緣生死」〔T1595 0226b09〕及「七種生死」〔T1595 0257c24〕 | 《止觀輔行傳弘決》另列七名;現行攝論群未得七名同列之單一連文,完整所指待考 |
| 三 | 「論有二文,初以二乘為四百而止,不作五百;後文以二乘為一百」〔T1911 0086b22〕 | 《大智度論》T1509 今本先依一百、二百、三百、四百由旬配欲界、色界、無色界、聲聞辟支佛道〔T1509 0526b06–08〕,復倒列四百至一百配欲界、色界、無色界、聲聞辟支佛〔T1509 0526b08–10〕 | 今本同段有兩套;本論依通教、出假之義會通 |
| 四 | 「童子飢時取糞中果,智人呵之,赧然有愧」〔T1911 0086c21〕;「須陀洹者八萬劫到,乃至支佛十千劫到」〔T1911 0087a16〕 | 《大般涅槃經》T374:「婆羅門幼稚童子,為飢所逼,見人糞中有菴羅果即便取之」〔T374 0435c27〕;「有智見已,呵責之言」〔T374 0435c28〕。又列須陀洹八萬劫、斯陀含六萬劫〔T374 0491c01〕,阿那含四萬、阿羅漢二萬、辟支佛十千劫〔T374 0491c02〕 | 前者為場景壓縮;後者以『乃至』省中三人 |
| 五 | 「有菩薩從初發心即與薩婆若相應」〔T1911 0087a19〕;「有菩薩從初發心即能遊戲神通、淨佛國土」〔T1911 0087a22〕;「有菩薩從初發心即能坐道場成正覺」〔T1911 0087a25〕 | 《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223 原有一人初發意行六波羅蜜〔T223 0226a07〕,一人初發意即得菩提轉法輪〔T223 0226a08〕,另一人初發意與般若相應〔T223 0226a12〕並從國至國淨佛國土〔T223 0226a13〕 | 智者略第一人,開原第三為相應、淨國兩義,移原第二為第三;不是今本原序三句 |
| 六 | 「《大論》引三喻,一則步涉,二則乘馬,三則神通」〔T1911 0087a29〕 | 《大智度論》T1509:「如遠行,或有乘羊而去,或有乘馬而去,或有神通去者」〔T1509 0342c04〕 | 步、羊異;《止觀輔行傳弘決》亦明記本論以步替羊 |
| 七 | 「正聞、正聽、正分別、正解於緣、正能覺了」〔T1911 0087b28〕 | 《合部金光明經》T664:「是金光明經,正聞正聽有大神力」〔T664 0381c06〕;《金光明經》T663:「我於諸法正解正觀,得正分別,正解於緣,正能覺了」〔T663 0346c04〕;《合部金光明經》另收後段〔T664 0389c09〕 | 本論五項由兩處合引,並非單一今本同一連文 |
道品調適
| 次 | 《摩訶止觀》原句 | 今本對讀 | 覆核 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 八 | 「當依念處得道」〔T1911 0087c12〕;「是道場」〔T1911 0087c12〕;「是摩訶衍」〔T1911 0087c13〕;「念處既攝餘品,餘品亦攝念處」〔T1911 0087c15〕 | 《大智度論》T1509 有「四念處雖具足能得道」〔T1509 0198a12〕及念處不離正勤、如意足、根、力〔T1509 0192b13〕;《維摩詰所說經》T475:「三十七品是道場,捨有為法故」〔T475 0542c26〕;《大智度論》又說念處乃至八聖道分是摩訶衍〔T1509 0197b29〕 | 四組各有同義或平行;『當依念處得道』與『清淨心常一,則能見般若』〔T1911 0087c23〕的單一所指待考 |
| 九 | 「三十七品是行道法;涅槃城有三門」〔T1911 0087c29〕 | 《大智度論》T1509:「三十七品是趣涅槃道,行是道已,得到涅槃城。涅槃城有三門」〔T1509 0206a11〕 | 行道法、趣涅槃道異;本論據此分遠因、近因 |
| 十 | 「誰作是語?三藏、摩訶衍皆不作是說」〔T1911 0088a04〕 | 《大智度論》T1509 先問三十七品既是二乘道,何以菩薩道中說聲聞法〔T1509 0197b21–23〕,答「菩薩摩訶薩應學一切善法」〔T1509 0197b23〕,終說念處乃至八聖道分是摩訶衍〔T1509 0197b29〕 | 同一反詰義;今本無本論整句 |
| 十一 | 「道品善知識,由是成正覺」〔T1911 0088a05〕;「道品是道場,亦是摩訶衍」〔T1911 0088a06〕 | 《維摩詰所說經》T475:「道品善知識,由是成正覺」〔T475 0549c07〕;另有三十七品是道場〔T475 0542c26〕。《大智度論》有道品是摩訶衍〔T1509 0197b29〕 | 善知識句同文;道場、摩訶衍分見兩典 |
| 十二 | 「能修八正道者,即見佛性,名得醍醐」〔T1911 0088a07〕 | 《大般涅槃經》T374 先說「若有能修八聖道者,當知是人則得明見」〔T374 0539a11〕,隨後以忍辱草、牛食成醍醐譬佛性〔T374 0539a12〕 | 本論撮合相鄰兩層;今本無整句 |
| 十三 | 「三十七品是菩薩寶炬陀羅尼」〔T1911 0088a08〕 | 《大方等大集經》T397 逐組列道品並結寶炬陀羅尼;末有「成就定慧二翅翼,遊翔平坦八正路,趣向無上智解脫,是名寶炬陀羅尼」〔T397 0026a04〕 | 本論總括全組;今本不是該整句 |
| 十四 | 「三十七品是涅槃因,非大涅槃因;無量阿僧祇助菩提法是大涅槃因」〔T1911 0088a10〕 | 《大般涅槃經》T374:「三十七品是涅槃因,非大涅槃因,無量阿僧祇助菩提法,乃得名為大涅槃因」〔T374 0492c08〕 | 本論末句作『是』,今本作『乃得名為』 |
| 十五 | 「一種苦集如爪上土,分別苦集有無量相,如十方土」〔T1911 0088a12〕 | 《大般涅槃經》T374:「取地少土,置之爪上」〔T374 0563a25〕;「爪上土者,不比十方所有土也」〔T374 0563a26〕 | 經譬只比少土、十方土;道品配置是智者之用 |
| 十六 | 「欲界二十二、未到三十六、初禪三十七」〔T1911 0088a16〕;《大論》所引作「是菩薩道。」〔T1911 0088a21〕 | 《止觀輔行傳弘決》題《大智度論》而照錄計數;現行 T1509 未得同文。T1509 可見道品是摩訶衍〔T1509 0197b29〕 | 計數之現行所屬典籍所指待考;『菩薩道』是撮義 |
| 十七 | 「若八正在七覺後,亦得是有漏,亦得是無漏」〔T1911 0088b08〕;「若八正在七覺前,一向是無漏」〔T1911 0088b10〕 | 《阿毘曇毘婆沙論》T1546:「若覺支後說道支者,當知道支一向無漏」〔T1546 0362c11〕;「若道支後說覺支者,當知道支是有漏無漏」〔T1546 0362c12〕。《阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論》T1545 方向相同〔T1545 0493b12–13〕 | 現行兩婆沙的方向與本論所述相反,並錄不判;T1546 另有念處乃至道支各通有漏、無漏〔T1546 0364b23〕 |
| 十八 | 「修八正道得初善有漏五陰」〔T1911 0088a27〕 | 《大智度論》T1509 有「有漏者,善有漏五眾」〔T1509 0208a06〕,又在他段由聞法、憶念展開道品次第 | 本論據多段整合;未得整句與整套次第同一連文 |
| 十九 | 「無漏根、力、覺、道之財」〔T1911 0088a24〕 | 《妙法蓮華經》T262:「乘是三乘,以無漏根、力、覺、道、禪定、解脫、三昧等而自娛樂」〔T262 0013b16〕 | 今本無『之財』,並多禪定、解脫、三昧 |
| 二十 | 「欲以一切種修四念處者」〔T1911 0088b14〕;「念處是法界,攝一切法」〔T1911 0088b14〕;「譬如大地一,能生種種芽」〔T1911 0088b16〕;「一切種相、體、性,皆是一種相、體、性」〔T1911 0088b17〕 | 《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223 分見一切種修四念處〔T223 0246c26〕及一切法趣四念處〔T223 0333c09〕;《大方廣佛華嚴經》T278:「譬如大地一,能生種種芽」〔T278 0428b01〕;《妙法蓮華經》T262 分見佛種從緣起〔T262 0009b09〕與眾生種相體性〔T262 0019b26〕 | 本論以後經釋前經;『念處是法界』及一種相體性是天台配置,不是三經共有連文 |
| 二十一 | 「泥洹道易得」〔T1911 0089b12〕;「一心勤精進故得三菩提」〔T1911 0089b16〕;「若離五蓋專修七覺,不得入者無有是處」〔T1911 0089c20〕 | 《大智度論》T1509 有菩薩一心勤精進則必得大智慧之平行〔T1509 0602a10〕;又說不離五蓋、不修七覺不能得道,離蓋修覺則有是處〔T1509 0683a29–0683b01〕 | 七覺句是正反格式撮合;前兩句單一所指待考 |
| 二十二 | 《大經》題引:「若有能修八正道者,即得醍醐。」〔T1911 0090a04〕 | 《大般涅槃經》T374:「若有能修八聖道者,當知是人則得明見。善男子!雪山有草名曰忍辱,牛若食之則成醍醐,眾生佛性亦復如是。」〔T374 0539a11–13〕 | 本論再度撮合今本相鄰兩層;今本無整句同文 |
| 二十三 | 《大論》題引:「四念處中四種精進,名『四正勤』;四種定心,名『四如意足』;五善根生,名為『根』;根增長,名為『力』;分別四念處道用,名為『覺』;四念處安隱道中行,名『八正道』。」〔T1911 0090a06〕 | 《大智度論》T1509:「四念處中:四種精進,則是四正懃;四種定,是為四如意足;五種善法,是為五根、五力。」〔T1509 0192b14–16〕 | 本論展開根、力、覺、八正;今本此句明列正懃、如意足、五根、五力 |
| 二十四 | 《大品》所明,離三惡道名「葉益」〔T1911 0090a21〕 | 《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223 依次說離三惡道為葉益〔T223 0377a20〕、生剎利婆羅門等為華益〔T223 0377a21〕、得諸果乃至佛道為果益〔T223 0377a24〕 | 花、華異;本論再依空、假、中重釋 |
| 二十五 | 「行三十七道品將到無漏城。域有三門」〔T1911 0090a28〕;「聲聞緣空修三解脫;菩薩緣諸法實相修三解脫」〔T1911 0090b28〕 | 《大智度論》T1509 作涅槃城有三門〔T1509 0206a11〕;又說「是三解脫門,緣諸法實相」〔T1509 0207c18〕並分聲聞、菩薩用門 | 本論底本原字為『域』;聲聞、菩薩對句是撮合。『非智不禪』『非禪不智』之根本典所指待考 |
| 二十六 | 本論記古本作「若觀極微色,則有十八空。」〔T1911 0090b12〕,所見今本作「若觀一端疊,則有十八空。」〔T1911 0090b13〕 | 《大智度論》T1509 現行本分見極微色〔T1509 0147c16〕、疊因緣故有衣〔T1509 0147c18〕及疊中十八空相〔T1509 0148a21〕 | 是智者所見古、今論本的校讀紀錄;現行本不具兩個完整條件句並列 |
| 二十七 | 《方等》所引作「大空、小空皆歸一空。」〔T1911 0090c10〕;《大品》所引作「獨空」〔T1911 0090c12〕 | 『方等』是汎稱,未鎖定單一所屬典籍;《大般涅槃經》T374 只有大小空義近句〔T374 0503c06〕。《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223:「般若波羅蜜示佛世間獨空」〔T223 0326c27〕 | 前句所指待考,後句題名、T 號與今本相合 |
| 二十八 | 「《華嚴》日出先照高山」〔T1911 0090c20〕;「《涅槃》遙指八千聲聞於《法華》中得記作佛,如秋收冬藏更無所作」〔T1911 0090c26〕;「即舉舍利弗六人,又別舉如來」〔T1911 0090c28〕 | 《大方廣佛華嚴經》T278:「譬如日出時,先照大山王,又復次第照,一切諸大山」〔T278 0618a14〕。《大般涅槃經》T374:「如《法花》中,八千聲聞,得受記莂成大果實,如秋收冬藏,更無所作」〔T374 0420a23〕;又依次舉阿難、阿尼樓馱、迦葉、須菩提、目連、舍利弗及如來〔T374 0545b19–0545c26〕,另說「五種涅槃,謂色解脫,乃至識解脫」〔T374 0467b19〕 | 日照譬被本論用作五時判;八千句字異並錄;六人與五解脫分見同經不同段 |
未定所指共六組:『當依念處得道』、『清淨心常一,則能見般若』、『泥洹道易得』、『一心勤精進故得三菩提』、『非智不禪/非禪不智』及『大空、小空皆歸一空』。這裡只陳述現有材料未鎖定單一所屬典籍,不據此斷言任何典籍不存在。
四、輔行釋要〔鏡〕
《止觀輔行傳弘決》先把識通塞總判為橫、竪、橫別、一心四義〔T1912 0357c01〕。得失之別在有著、無著;即使觀法本正,若於能觀生著,著心仍與邪同〔T1912 0357b09–18〕。所以檢校不是只破明顯的塞,而是防行者在已得之通中再起塞。
六家異解之後,《止觀輔行傳弘決》以「今明下今家正解」〔T1912 0358c05〕標出三番五百的轉折。橫、竪相織則用經緯為喻:「竪三如經橫三如緯。織之令成三諦文章」〔T1912 0359a04〕。入空、出假、中觀各自仍須歷法、能、所與諦、緣、度,不因名為中觀便免於檢校。
《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》的三類菩薩,在本論中經過開、移、重排;《止觀輔行傳弘決》明記「今文所引開彼第三為第一第二。以第二為第三」〔T1912 0359c18〕。三喻的步、馬、神通,也由湛然明記「今此文中以步替羊」〔T1912 0360a08〕。兩處都只辨本論用經之形,不以今本靜默改寫本論。
一心段先斥橫、竪分張,再明一心功能〔T1912 0360a12〕。一心具三,破次第三觀;三觀只是一心,破橫向分張〔T1912 0360b05–07〕。但若在『無通無塞』上再起執著,仍是別相之塞,尚須檢校使塞得通〔T1912 0360c13〕。三異名因而各有分工:通塞約解,得失約行,字非字約教〔T1912 0360c19–23〕。
道品調適中,只有相生義使七科次第調停;《止觀輔行傳弘決》說「調停乃是諸品調試」〔T1912 0361b17〕。有漏道品作無漏方便,被限在初心調停、能為初住無漏作因〔T1912 0361b23〕。正道、助道兩種說法不可二選一,湛然直說「今文意須有正助」〔T1912 0362a26〕。
本論只廣明無作道諦三十七品,《止觀輔行傳弘決》判為本段正意而暫置其餘三種〔T1912 0362b24〕。它又說三經是以後後釋前前〔T1912 0362c02〕,並以一念百界千如、三千世間攝成三諦,釋無作念處〔T1912 0362c21〕。四念處文字有先後,實觀不出一念〔T1912 0362c25〕;四正勤的文字似次第,意則圓融〔T1912 0363b21〕。
四如意足屬定,但須定慧均等才是有慧之定〔T1912 0363b29、0363c05〕。五根再修令增長,便受五力之名〔T1912 0364a12〕。七覺以寂照、除等、進等調停,念則通持定慧兩組〔T1912 0364b05–07〕。至八正雖品位已極,仍說初心可修,尚未論深位〔T1912 0364b09、0364c02〕。
道樹譬中,本論由種子、芽、根、莖葉、花、果配道品,沒有明配如意足。《止觀輔行傳弘決》說「文並闕如意。譬中應云莖幹上聳即如意足」〔T1912 0364c16〕;這是湛然對譬項的補釋,不改本論原文。
三三昧與三解脫的王臣配法有多種,《止觀輔行傳弘決》說「準望聖教不可專一。故並云或」〔T1912 0365a10〕。圓教以空即無相、無作,一門即三門〔T1912 0365b16–17〕;三門之意不是次第,但仍須先知道三藏、通、別、圓的異相,才可觀其同〔T1912 0365c21–23〕。
末段五時由湛然判作五味〔T1912 0365c25〕;雙樹一段則列六人與如來〔T1912 0366b01〕,以五陰成五解脫〔T1912 0366b25〕,再說三佛性與六法不即不離〔T1912 0366b27〕。這些都是《止觀輔行傳弘決》的逐文判釋,各守其責任層。
《止觀義例》T1913 以「三止三觀在一心中」〔T1913 0451a05〕與「節節檢校」〔T1913 0451a06〕綱要識通塞,又說「須用諸品展轉調停」〔T1913 0451a15〕。《止觀大意》T1914 則說「於通起塞此塞須破。於塞得通此通須護」〔T1914 0460c22〕,並以「七科次第調試」〔T1914 0460c28〕收束道品。
五、諸家異釋
本單元除《止觀輔行傳弘決》宗內逐文之鏡外,後世天台文獻有三處直接承受,均只誌其讀法,不判後世宗諍。
一、《四明十義書》T1936 以『通塞已去』劃定後續觀五陰的範圍:「但為通塞已去。通約五陰修觀故」〔T1936 0840a10〕;又說「從此已去。乃至離愛。具約五陰」〔T1936 0840a12〕。此處直接承本單元在十乘中的序位。
二、《四明尊者教行錄》T1937 連寫破執、尋塞與道品:「仗茲遍破執情」〔T1937 0868b18〕、「據此反尋塞著」〔T1937 0868b19〕、「道品因其。中適」〔T1937 0868b20〕。『中適』守今本原字;此為兩乘連續承受的見證,不改寫為本論字樣。
三、《天台四教儀》T1931 連寫識通塞與道品調適:「苦集。十二因緣。六蔽。塵沙。無明為塞。道滅。滅因緣智。六度。一心三觀為通。若通須護。有塞須破。於通起塞。能破如所破。節節撿校。名識通塞。」〔T1931 0780c12–15〕;「六道品調適。謂無作道品。一一調停隨宜而入。」〔T1931 0780c15–17〕。此為兩乘法義的連續承受。
六、術語
| 詞 | 本論用法 | 《止觀輔行傳弘決》釋讀 |
|---|---|---|
| 通塞、得失、字非字 | 三名同旨而分別約解、行、教〔0087b25–0087c02〕 | 得失即有著、無著;教有名有實才叫知字〔0360c19–23〕 |
| 能破如所破 | 觀空智慧若被愛著,能破本身也轉成塞〔0086a21〕 | 觀法雖正,著心同邪〔0357b18〕 |
| 三番五百 | 依生死處所、煩惱、觀智三層各說五百〔0086b28–0086c08〕 | 今家正解,以由旬釋通塞意〔0358c05–0359a01〕 |
| 橫織竪 | 以諦、緣、度之橫三逐一檢校空、假、中之竪三〔0086c08–0087a18〕 | 如經、緯織成三諦文章〔0359a04〕 |
| 一心三觀、三觀一心 | 一心具空假中破竪分張,三觀不離一心破橫分張〔0087b08–16〕 | 一心具三、三只是一〔0360b05–07〕 |
| 無通無塞 | 觸處如空故無塞,無塞故無通;若於此再起障蔽仍成塞〔0087b14–24〕 | 無通塞之執仍須檢校〔0360c13〕 |
| 當分、相攝、約位、相生 | 道品四種組織;前三不是調停,相生才是善巧調適〔0087c09–23〕 | 相生使七科次第調停、諸品調試〔0361b16〕 |
| 正助 | 道品有時稱正道,有時稱助道〔0088a16–23〕 | 本段正、助兩義皆須保存〔0362a26〕 |
| 無作道品 | 本論不具記其餘道諦,只廣明無作三十七品〔0088b12〕 | 是今文正意,暫置其餘三種〔0362b24〕 |
| 中間 | 四念處破凡夫、二乘倒,雙立枯榮,再雙非枯榮〔0088c17–0089b07〕 | 非二邊,也不是另立一個實體中點 |
| 道品調適 | 相生、未入則轉進、浮沉則以七覺均調〔0087c20–0090a12〕 | 名異義同,用為調試〔0363b15〕 |
| 三三昧、三解脫 | 依定生慧或依慧生定分王臣,也可定慧合說〔0090a27–0090b11〕 | 不可專一;圓門中空即無相、無作〔0365a10–0365b17〕 |
七、譬喻、互讀與承衍
識通塞以除眼膜而養明珠、破賊而護良將,顯破塞不是連通一併毀去。化城五百由旬又被分作處所、煩惱、觀智三番,說明同一險道可從所歷、所斷、能觀三面檢校。匙孔與鎖齒不合,則顯單線配置不能會三番;橫竪如經緯,才把諦、緣、度與空、假、中織成可逐處檢驗的文章。
步涉、乘馬、神通本來分顯三觀快慢,本論隨即指出三義分張仍非所用。一心三觀如於虛空遊行,不必去下陵高、避山從谷;然而若執著『無通無塞』,通又翻成塞。蟲蝕木偶成字形,則把只有三觀之名而不知其義的危險照出。
道品以釀酒譬調停:酵暖與麴糵須得其宜,方便才可能轉成入理之因。無作四念處又以大地生芽、雙樹枯榮、祕密藏組織八倒之破與中道之入。道樹譬把法性作地、念處作種、正勤作芽、五根作根、五力作莖葉、七覺作花、八正作果;《止觀輔行傳弘決》所指出的如意足缺項,只在鏡中誌明。
三解脫門以王臣顯定慧互資,以夢事與眠法顯十八空歸於一空。末段日照高山、鹿苑四枯、方等般若調枯入榮、鶴林雙樹,將道品放入一代施化之次第;八千聲聞於《法華》得記,如秋收冬藏,顯利根可處處得入。
《止觀義例》把通塞說成治能執、道品說成以念處為體;《止觀大意》把破塞護通與七科調試連成一線。向前互讀破法遍,可見通塞專檢能破之執;向後互讀助道對治,可見道品調適仍不足時,另須對治助開。於全帙中,本單元又承《妙法蓮華經》化城、佛種、八千得記及《金光明經》五正之語,與法華、金光明兩帙可互照而不混其題署。
八、校本定位
本編以大正藏 T1911 為單一底本。原典每逢換頁,於該頁第一段首標〔T46 頁欄行〕;錨點取段首字前最近大正行標。下表全列本單元範圍內十八個校記;『原字』守正文,『異讀』守異本,空缺記作『無』。表中【大】為大正底本,【甲】為德川刊島地大等氏藏本,【宮】為宮內省圖書寮藏宋本,【洪武】為洪武南藏,【CB】標示電子本增補或校訂。其中兩個『疊』為同一星號連動而在底本分作兩個校記,故仍按十八項列。
| 次 | 行錨 | 原字/見本 | 異讀/見本 | 備註 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 一 | 0086a13 | 上【大】 | 之上【甲】 | 卷題夾註內校記 |
| 二 | 0086b05 | 三【大】 | 無【甲】 | |
| 三 | 0086b24 | 通【CB】【宮-CB】 | 道【大】 | 電子本增補 |
| 四 | 0087a03 | 意【大】 | 慧【甲】 | |
| 五 | 0087c22 | 道【大】 | 無【甲】 | |
| 六 | 0087c28 | 糵【CB】 | 蘖【大】 | 電子本增補 |
| 七 | 0088a09 | 明【大】 | 無【甲】 | |
| 八 | 0088a22 | 也【大】 | 無【甲】 | |
| 九 | 0088a26 | 皆【大】 | 皆是【甲】 | |
| 十 | 0088a27 | 修【大】 | 經【甲】 | |
| 十一 | 0088b08 | 毘【大】 | 無【甲】 | |
| 十二 | 0088b20 | 一【CB】【洪武-CB】【甲】 | 是【大】 | 電子本校訂 |
| 十三 | 0088c15 | 行【大】 | 想行【甲】 | |
| 十四 | 0090b13 | 疊【大】* | 㲲【甲】* | 關聯校記第一處 |
| 十五 | 0090b13 | 疊【大】* | 㲲【甲】* | 關聯校記第二處 |
| 十六 | 0090c16 | 一【大】 | 一解脫【甲】 | |
| 十七 | 0090c29 | 弗【大】 | 弗等【甲】 | |
| 十八 | 0091a01 | 子【大】 | 子等【甲】 |
卷題校記雖在正文首段之前,仍落在本單元指定範圍,故不從分母剔除。電子本校訂與大正原字、各見本異讀只作責任層誌錄,不在此裁其優劣。
This unit combines the fifth of the ten vehicles, discerning passage and obstruction, with the sixth, regulating the factors of the path. The first half opens the meaning of passage and obstruction through the alternate names gain and loss and word and nonword; breaks six masters’ correlations of the five hundred yojanas; establishes three rounds concerning places, afflictions, and contemplative wisdom; and proceeds from horizontal, vertical, and horizontal distinctions to the three contemplations in one mind. The second half lists four meanings of the factors of the path—as individually defined, mutually inclusive, according to stages, and mutually arising—and takes mutual arising as regulation. It then unfolds the nonconstructed four foundations of mindfulness, four right efforts, four bases of spiritual power, five faculties, five powers, seven factors of awakening, Eightfold Path, and three gates of liberation. The body taught by Zhiyi and recorded by Guanding extends from 「第五、識通塞者」 tr. “Fifth, discerning passage and obstruction”〔T1911 0086a17〕, also named knowing gain and loss and knowing word and nonword, through 「不即六法,不離六法」 tr. “neither identical with the six Dharmas nor apart from the six Dharmas”〔T1911 0091a04〕.
1. Doctrinal-Outline Placement
This unit lies within the seventh of the ten extensive chapters, direct cultivation of calming-and-contemplation, and within the ten vehicles for contemplating the first of the ten objects, the object of aggregates, sense fields, and elements. It follows the fourth vehicle, pervasive breaking through Dharmas, and precedes the seventh, counteraction through aids to the path. Discerning passage and obstruction begins at the first sentence of the first half of fascicle seven〔T46 0086a17〕. The introductory circle for regulating the factors of the path is at〔T46 0087c08〕, while the nearest line anchor before the first graph of “sixth” is〔T46 0087c09〕. The next vehicle, counteraction through aids to the path, begins at〔T46 0091a05〕.
The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue, T1912, opens its direct commentary on the fifth vehicle with 「次釋通塞中先列異名。次明來意有法譬合」 tr. “Next, in explaining passage and obstruction, it first lists alternate names, then explains the intent through Dharma, simile, and correlation”〔T1912 0357b05〕. It opens direct commentary on the sixth with 「○次明道品調適者。先通列釋四道品相」 tr. “Next, explaining regulation of the factors of the path: first generally list and explain four arrangements of these factors”〔T1912 0361b02〕. According to the sectional openings in the treatise and the line-by-line correspondences in the Fuxing Chuanhong Jue, the unit has fifteen sections:
| Section | Range in the treatise | Content | Corresponding Fuxing Chuanhong Jue passage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0086a17–0086a24 | Three alternate names, intent, and the need to inspect even what breaks | 0357b05–0357c23 |
| 2 | 0086a24–0086c08 | Six differing interpretations and three rounds of five hundred | 0358a–0359a01 |
| 3 | 0086c08–0087a18 | Three horizontal, three vertical, and horizontal woven with vertical | 0359a04–0359c09 |
| 4 | 0087a18–0087b25 | Three contemplations at the initial mind, three similes, and one mind breaking horizontal and vertical | 0359c09–0360c13 |
| 5 | 0087b25–0087c08 | Similarities and differences among the three names and four questions on horizontal and vertical | 0360c19–0361b02 |
| 6 | 0087c08–0088b12 | Four meanings of the factors of the path; intent; Great and Small; direct and assisting; contaminated and uncontaminated | 0361b02–0362b24 |
| 7 | 0088b12–0089b07 | Nonconstructed four foundations of mindfulness | 0362c02–0363b15 |
| 8 | 0089b07–0089b18 | Four right efforts | 0363b17–0363b28 |
| 9 | 0089b18–0089b27 | Four bases of spiritual power | 0363b29–0363c20 |
| 10 | 0089b27–0089c08 | Five faculties | 0363c21–0364a11 |
| 11 | 0089c08–0089c16 | Five powers | 0364a12–0364b04 |
| 12 | 0089c16–0090a12 | Seven factors of awakening, Eightfold Path, and conclusion at the initial mind | 0364b05–0364c11 |
| 13 | 0090a12–0090a27 | Simile of the tree of the path | 0364c12–0364c28 |
| 14 | 0090a27–0090c20 | Three gates of liberation in the Tripiṭaka, Shared, Distinct, and Perfect teachings | 0364c29–0365c23 |
| 15 | 0090c20–0091a05 | Five periods, twin trees, and five liberations | 0365c25–0366c11 |
The Zhiguan Yili, T1913, gathers the two vehicles through 「道品中不出念處。通塞中元治能執」 tr. “Within the factors of the path one does not go beyond the foundations of mindfulness; within passage and obstruction one fundamentally treats the active grasping”〔T1913 0447c25〕. It further says 「通塞只是上二細門。以一道品調停陰入」 tr. “Passage and obstruction are only the two subtle gates above; use one set of factors of the path to regulate the aggregates and sense fields”〔T1913 0449b12〕. This unit therefore both continues the preceding inspection of active grasping and uses the factors of the path to regulate contemplation of the aggregates and sense fields.
2. Formation and Transmission
This unit inherits the formation account’s record of the summer teaching at Yuquan, teaching by Zhiyi, recording by Guanding, and the unfinished state of the received transmission. Its threefold evidence for incompletion and the three recensions, including the third revised recension recorded by the Fuxing Chuanhong Jue, are treated in the formation unit without speculation here about their cause. The interlinear note “first half” in the fascicle title and its variant are recorded separately in the source text and Section 8.
3. Verification of the Scriptures and Treatises Cited
Following the treatise’s sequence, the table lists all twenty-eight identifiable groups of citations, titled citations, and scenes in this unit. The left column preserves the original wording of the Mohe Zhiguan; the right checks it against the relevant Taishō title, short T number, and current line anchor. Where the received text lacks identical wording, has only a parallel, or leaves the referent uncertain, that state is stated without forcing an identification.
Discerning Passage and Obstruction
| No. | Original sentence in the Mohe Zhiguan | Received parallel | Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 「大導師善知通塞,將導眾人能過五百由旬」 tr. “The great guide knows passage and obstruction well and can lead the multitude across five hundred yojanas”〔T1911 0086a23〕; 「《法華》過三百由旬作化城」 tr. “In the Lotus, after three hundred yojanas he creates a phantom city”〔T1911 0086b02〕 | Lotus Sūtra, T262: 「譬如五百由旬險難惡道,曠絕無人、怖畏之處。」 tr. “It resembles a dangerous evil road five hundred yojanas long, desolate, empty of people, and fearful”〔T262 0025c26〕; 「有一導師,聰慧明達,善知險道通塞之相」 tr. “There is a guide, intelligent, wise, and discerning, who knows well the marks of passage and obstruction on the dangerous road”〔T262 0025c28〕; 「過三百由旬,化作一城」 tr. “After three hundred yojanas, he conjures a city”〔T262 0026a04〕 | The treatise combines five hundred, the guide, and passage and obstruction; the complete configuration of three rounds of five hundred is Zhiyi’s integration of scripture |
| 2 | 「《攝大乘》人以三界為三百,方便、因緣兩生死足為五百」 tr. “Followers of the Mahāyānasaṃgraha take the three realms as three hundred, with the two kinds of birth-and-death—skillful means and conditions—completing five hundred”〔T1911 0086a27〕 | The Mahāyānasaṃgraha-bhāṣya, T1595, has 「方便生死」 tr. “birth-and-death of skillful means”〔T1595 0225c24〕, 「因緣生死」 tr. “birth-and-death of conditions”〔T1595 0226b09〕, and 「七種生死」 tr. “seven kinds of birth-and-death”〔T1595 0257c24〕 | The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue separately lists seven names; no single continuous passage listing all seven has been found in the current Mahāyānasaṃgraha corpus. Complete referent under investigation |
| 3 | 「論有二文,初以二乘為四百而止,不作五百;後文以二乘為一百」 tr. “The treatise has two passages: the first takes the Two Vehicles as four hundred and stops, without making five hundred; the later passage takes the Two Vehicles as one hundred”〔T1911 0086b22〕 | In the current Great Treatise, T1509, one sequence correlates one hundred, two hundred, three hundred, and four hundred yojanas with the desire, form, and formless realms and the paths of śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas〔T1509 0526b06–08〕; it then reverses four hundred through one hundred and correlates them with the desire, form, and formless realms and śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas〔T1509 0526b08–10〕 | The current passage has two configurations; the treatise integrates them through the meanings of the Shared Teaching and emerging into the provisional |
| 4 | 「童子飢時取糞中果,智人呵之,赧然有愧」 tr. “When hungry, a child takes fruit from excrement; a wise person rebukes him, and he blushes in shame”〔T1911 0086c21〕; 「須陀洹者八萬劫到,乃至支佛十千劫到」 tr. “A stream-enterer arrives after eighty thousand eons, down to a pratyekabuddha after ten thousand”〔T1911 0087a16〕 | Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra, T374: 「婆羅門幼稚童子,為飢所逼,見人糞中有菴羅果即便取之」 tr. “A young brahmin child, pressed by hunger, sees a mango in human excrement and immediately takes it”〔T374 0435c27〕; 「有智見已,呵責之言」 tr. “A wise person sees this and rebukes him”〔T374 0435c28〕. It also lists stream-enterers at eighty thousand and once-returners at sixty thousand eons〔T374 0491c01〕, nonreturners at forty thousand, arhats at twenty thousand, and pratyekabuddhas at ten thousand〔T374 0491c02〕 | The first scene is compressed; “down to” omits the three intermediate persons from the latter list |
| 5 | 「有菩薩從初發心即與薩婆若相應」 tr. “Some bodhisattvas correspond with omniscience from the first arousal of mind”〔T1911 0087a19〕; 「有菩薩從初發心即能遊戲神通、淨佛國土」 tr. “Some bodhisattvas can sport in superknowledges and purify buddha-lands from the first arousal of mind”〔T1911 0087a22〕; 「有菩薩從初發心即能坐道場成正覺」 tr. “Some bodhisattvas can sit at the site of awakening and accomplish correct awakening from the first arousal of mind”〔T1911 0087a25〕 | The Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra, T223, first has one person practice the six perfections from the first arousal〔T223 0226a07〕, another immediately attain awakening and turn the Dharma wheel〔T223 0226a08〕, and a third correspond with prajñā from the first arousal〔T223 0226a12〕 and travel from land to land purifying buddha-lands〔T223 0226a13〕 | Zhiyi omits the first person, divides the received third into correspondence and purification of lands, and moves the received second to third position; these are not the three sentences in the current sequence |
| 6 | 「《大論》引三喻,一則步涉,二則乘馬,三則神通」 tr. “The Great Treatise cites three similes: first traveling on foot, second riding a horse, third superknowledge”〔T1911 0087a29〕 | Great Treatise, T1509: 「如遠行,或有乘羊而去,或有乘馬而去,或有神通去者」 tr. “For a distant journey, some depart riding a sheep, some riding a horse, and some through superknowledge”〔T1509 0342c04〕 | Walking differs from riding a sheep; the Fuxing Chuanhong Jue explicitly records that the treatise substitutes walking for sheep |
| 7 | 「正聞、正聽、正分別、正解於緣、正能覺了」 tr. “Right hearing, right listening, right discrimination, right understanding of conditions, and right capacity for awakening”〔T1911 0087b28〕 | Combined Golden Light Sūtra, T664: 「是金光明經,正聞正聽有大神力」 tr. “Rightly hearing and rightly listening to this Golden Light Sūtra has great divine power”〔T664 0381c06〕; Golden Light Sūtra, T663: 「我於諸法正解正觀,得正分別,正解於緣,正能覺了」 tr. “Regarding all Dharmas, I rightly understand and contemplate, attain right discrimination, rightly understand conditions, and rightly awaken”〔T663 0346c04〕; the Combined Golden Light Sūtra also includes the latter passage〔T664 0389c09〕 | The treatise combines five items from two places rather than one continuous received passage |
Regulating the Factors of the Path
| No. | Original sentence in the Mohe Zhiguan | Received parallel | Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 「當依念處得道」 tr. “One should attain the path in reliance on the foundations of mindfulness”〔T1911 0087c12〕; 「是道場」 tr. “They are the site of awakening”〔T1911 0087c12〕; 「是摩訶衍」 tr. “They are the Great Vehicle”〔T1911 0087c13〕; 「念處既攝餘品,餘品亦攝念處」 tr. “Since the foundations of mindfulness include the remaining factors, the remaining factors also include the foundations”〔T1911 0087c15〕 | The Great Treatise, T1509, has 「四念處雖具足能得道」 tr. “Although the four foundations of mindfulness are sufficient to attain the path”〔T1509 0198a12〕 and says they do not depart from the right efforts, bases of spiritual power, faculties, or powers〔T1509 0192b13〕. The Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra, T475, says 「三十七品是道場,捨有為法故」 tr. “The thirty-seven factors are the site of awakening because they abandon conditioned Dharmas”〔T475 0542c26〕. The Great Treatise also says the foundations through the factors of the Noble Eightfold Path are the Great Vehicle〔T1509 0197b29〕 | Each of the four groups has the same or parallel meaning. The single referents of “one should attain the path in reliance on the foundations” and 『清淨心常一,則能見般若』 tr. “When the pure mind is constantly one, it can see prajñā”〔T1911 0087c23〕 remain under investigation |
| 9 | 「三十七品是行道法;涅槃城有三門」 tr. “The thirty-seven factors are Dharmas for practicing the path; the city of nirvāṇa has three gates”〔T1911 0087c29〕 | Great Treatise, T1509: 「三十七品是趣涅槃道,行是道已,得到涅槃城。涅槃城有三門」 tr. “The thirty-seven factors are the path leading to nirvāṇa; after practicing this path, one reaches the city of nirvāṇa. The city of nirvāṇa has three gates”〔T1509 0206a11〕 | “Dharmas for practicing the path” differs from “path leading to nirvāṇa”; the treatise uses this to distinguish remote and proximate causes |
| 10 | 「誰作是語?三藏、摩訶衍皆不作是說」 tr. “Who makes this statement? Neither the Tripiṭaka nor the Great Vehicle teaches so”〔T1911 0088a04〕 | The Great Treatise, T1509, first asks why śrāvaka Dharmas are taught in the bodhisattva path if the thirty-seven factors belong to the Two Vehicles〔T1509 0197b21–23〕, answers 「菩薩摩訶薩應學一切善法」 tr. “Bodhisattva mahāsattvas should learn every wholesome Dharma”〔T1509 0197b23〕, and concludes that the foundations through the factors of the Noble Eightfold Path are the Great Vehicle〔T1509 0197b29〕 | The same rhetorical intent; the current text lacks the complete sentence from the treatise |
| 11 | 「道品善知識,由是成正覺」 tr. “The factors of the path are good spiritual friends; through them one accomplishes correct awakening”〔T1911 0088a05〕; 「道品是道場,亦是摩訶衍」 tr. “The factors of the path are the site of awakening and are also the Great Vehicle”〔T1911 0088a06〕 | Vimalakīrtinirdeśa Sūtra, T475: 「道品善知識,由是成正覺」 tr. “The factors of the path are good spiritual friends; through them one accomplishes correct awakening”〔T475 0549c07〕; it separately says the thirty-seven factors are the site of awakening〔T475 0542c26〕. The Great Treatise says the factors are the Great Vehicle〔T1509 0197b29〕 | The good-spiritual-friend sentence is identical; site of awakening and Great Vehicle occur in two works |
| 12 | 「能修八正道者,即見佛性,名得醍醐」 tr. “One who can cultivate the Eightfold Path immediately sees buddha-nature and is called one who attains ghee”〔T1911 0088a07〕 | The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra, T374, first says 「若有能修八聖道者,當知是人則得明見」 tr. “Know that one who can cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path attains clear seeing”〔T374 0539a11〕, then uses the simile of cows eating tolerance-grass and producing ghee for buddha-nature〔T374 0539a12〕 | The treatise combines two adjacent layers; the current text has no complete identical sentence |
| 13 | 「三十七品是菩薩寶炬陀羅尼」 tr. “The thirty-seven factors are the bodhisattva’s Treasure-Torch Dhāraṇī”〔T1911 0088a08〕 | The Mahāvaipulya Great Collection Sūtra, T397, lists the groups of factors in succession and concludes the Treasure-Torch Dhāraṇī; it ends, 「成就定慧二翅翼,遊翔平坦八正路,趣向無上智解脫,是名寶炬陀羅尼」 tr. “Accomplishing the two wings of concentration and wisdom, soaring along the level road of the Eightfold Path, and proceeding toward unsurpassed wisdom-liberation: this is called the Treasure-Torch Dhāraṇī”〔T397 0026a04〕 | The treatise gathers the entire group; this is not one complete sentence in the current text |
| 14 | 「三十七品是涅槃因,非大涅槃因;無量阿僧祇助菩提法是大涅槃因」 tr. “The thirty-seven factors are causes of nirvāṇa, not causes of great nirvāṇa; immeasurable incalculable Dharmas assisting awakening are causes of great nirvāṇa”〔T1911 0088a10〕 | Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra, T374: 「三十七品是涅槃因,非大涅槃因,無量阿僧祇助菩提法,乃得名為大涅槃因」 tr. “The thirty-seven factors are causes of nirvāṇa, not causes of great nirvāṇa; immeasurable incalculable Dharmas assisting awakening only then receive the name causes of great nirvāṇa”〔T374 0492c08〕 | The treatise’s final sentence has “are,” while the current text has “only then receive the name” |
| 15 | 「一種苦集如爪上土,分別苦集有無量相,如十方土」 tr. “One kind of suffering and origination resembles soil on a fingernail; distinctly analyzed, suffering and origination have immeasurable marks like the earth of the ten directions”〔T1911 0088a12〕 | Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra, T374: 「取地少土,置之爪上」 tr. “Take a little earth and place it on a fingernail”〔T374 0563a25〕; 「爪上土者,不比十方所有土也」 tr. “The soil on a fingernail cannot compare with all the earth in the ten directions”〔T374 0563a26〕 | The scriptural simile compares only a little soil with the earth of the ten directions; the configuration through factors of the path is Zhiyi’s use |
| 16 | 「欲界二十二、未到三十六、初禪三十七」 tr. “Twenty-two in the desire realm, thirty-six in the access concentration, and thirty-seven in the first dhyāna”〔T1911 0088a16〕; the Great Treatise citation has 「是菩薩道。」 tr. “This is the bodhisattva path”〔T1911 0088a21〕 | The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue attributes the count to the Great Treatise and records it, but no identical wording has been found in the current T1509 text. T1509 does say the factors of the path are the Great Vehicle〔T1509 0197b29〕 | The current source of the counts remains under investigation; “bodhisattva path” is a condensed statement of meaning |
| 17 | 「若八正在七覺後,亦得是有漏,亦得是無漏」 tr. “If the eight right factors follow the seven factors of awakening, they can be contaminated or uncontaminated”〔T1911 0088b08〕; 「若八正在七覺前,一向是無漏」 tr. “If the eight right factors precede the seven factors of awakening, they are exclusively uncontaminated”〔T1911 0088b10〕 | Abhidharma Vibhāṣā Treatise, T1546: 「若覺支後說道支者,當知道支一向無漏」 tr. “If path factors are taught after awakening factors, know that the path factors are exclusively uncontaminated”〔T1546 0362c11〕; 「若道支後說覺支者,當知道支是有漏無漏」 tr. “If awakening factors are taught after path factors, know that the path factors are both contaminated and uncontaminated”〔T1546 0362c12〕. The Abhidharma Mahāvibhāṣā Treatise, T1545, has the same direction〔T1545 0493b12–13〕 | The direction in the two current Vibhāṣā witnesses is opposite the treatise and is recorded side by side without adjudication. T1546 elsewhere says the foundations of mindfulness through path factors each extend through contaminated and uncontaminated〔T1546 0364b23〕 |
| 18 | 「修八正道得初善有漏五陰」 tr. “Cultivating the Eightfold Path obtains the initial wholesome contaminated five aggregates”〔T1911 0088a27〕 | The Great Treatise, T1509, has 「有漏者,善有漏五眾」 tr. “The contaminated are the wholesome contaminated five aggregates”〔T1509 0208a06〕 and elsewhere unfolds the sequence of factors of the path from hearing Dharma and recollection | The treatise integrates multiple passages; no single continuous passage with the complete sentence and sequence has been found |
| 19 | 「無漏根、力、覺、道之財」 tr. “the wealth of uncontaminated faculties, powers, awakening factors, and path factors”〔T1911 0088a24〕 | Lotus Sūtra, T262: 「乘是三乘,以無漏根、力、覺、道、禪定、解脫、三昧等而自娛樂」 tr. “Riding these three vehicles, they delight themselves with uncontaminated faculties, powers, awakening factors, path factors, meditative concentration, liberations, samādhis, and the rest”〔T262 0013b16〕 | The current text lacks “wealth” and adds meditative concentration, liberations, and samādhis |
| 20 | 「欲以一切種修四念處者」 tr. “Those who wish to cultivate the four foundations of mindfulness through all modes”〔T1911 0088b14〕; 「念處是法界,攝一切法」 tr. “The foundations of mindfulness are the Dharma realm and include all Dharmas”〔T1911 0088b14〕; 「譬如大地一,能生種種芽」 tr. “It resembles the one great earth, which can produce various sprouts”〔T1911 0088b16〕; 「一切種相、體、性,皆是一種相、體、性」 tr. “Every kind, mark, substance, and nature is the one kind, mark, substance, and nature”〔T1911 0088b17〕 | The Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra, T223, separately has cultivation of the four foundations through all modes〔T223 0246c26〕 and all Dharmas proceeding toward the four foundations〔T223 0333c09〕. The Avataṃsaka Sūtra, T278, says 「譬如大地一,能生種種芽」 tr. “It resembles the one great earth, which can produce various sprouts”〔T278 0428b01〕. The Lotus Sūtra, T262, separately has the Buddha seed arising from conditions〔T262 0009b09〕 and beings’ kinds, marks, substances, and natures〔T262 0019b26〕 | The treatise explains an earlier scripture through later scriptures. “The foundations are the Dharma realm” and the single kind, mark, substance, and nature are Tiantai configurations, not shared continuous wording in the three scriptures |
| 21 | 「泥洹道易得」 tr. “The path of nirvāṇa is easily attained”〔T1911 0089b12〕; 「一心勤精進故得三菩提」 tr. “Through diligent effort with one mind, one attains complete awakening”〔T1911 0089b16〕; 「若離五蓋專修七覺,不得入者無有是處」 tr. “If one leaves the five hindrances and exclusively cultivates the seven factors of awakening, it is impossible not to enter”〔T1911 0089c20〕 | The Great Treatise, T1509, has the parallel that a bodhisattva diligently strives with one mind and necessarily attains great wisdom〔T1509 0602a10〕. It also says that without leaving the five hindrances and cultivating the seven factors one cannot attain the path, while leaving the hindrances and cultivating the factors makes attainment possible〔T1509 0683a29–0683b01〕 | The sentence on seven factors condenses positive and negative formulations; the single referents of the first two sentences remain under investigation |
| 22 | The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra is cited as 「若有能修八正道者,即得醍醐。」 tr. “One who can cultivate the Eightfold Path immediately attains ghee”〔T1911 0090a04〕 | Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra, T374: 「若有能修八聖道者,當知是人則得明見。善男子!雪山有草名曰忍辱,牛若食之則成醍醐,眾生佛性亦復如是。」 tr. “Know that one who can cultivate the Noble Eightfold Path attains clear seeing. Good man, in the Snow Mountains there is a grass called tolerance; when cows eat it, they produce ghee. The buddha-nature of beings is likewise”〔T374 0539a11–13〕 | The treatise again combines two adjacent layers of the current text; there is no complete identical sentence |
| 23 | The Great Treatise is cited as 「四念處中四種精進,名『四正勤』;四種定心,名『四如意足』;五善根生,名為『根』;根增長,名為『力』;分別四念處道用,名為『覺』;四念處安隱道中行,名『八正道』。」 tr. “The four kinds of diligence within the four foundations of mindfulness are called the four right efforts; the four kinds of concentrated mind are called the four bases of spiritual power; the arising of five wholesome roots is called faculties; the growth of the faculties is called powers; distinguishing the function of the path within the four foundations is called awakening; and secure practice on the path of the four foundations is called the Eightfold Path”〔T1911 0090a06〕 | Great Treatise, T1509: 「四念處中:四種精進,則是四正懃;四種定,是為四如意足;五種善法,是為五根、五力。」 tr. “Within the four foundations of mindfulness, the four kinds of diligence are the four right efforts; the four kinds of concentration are the four bases of spiritual power; and the five wholesome Dharmas are the five faculties and five powers”〔T1509 0192b14–16〕 | The treatise unfolds faculties, powers, awakening factors, and Eightfold Path; the current sentence explicitly lists right efforts, bases of spiritual power, five faculties, and five powers |
| 24 | The Great Version explains that leaving the three evil destinations is called 「葉益」 tr. “benefit of leaves”〔T1911 0090a21〕 | The Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra, T223, successively calls leaving the three evil destinations benefit of leaves〔T223 0377a20〕, birth as kṣatriyas, brahmins, and the rest benefit of flowers〔T223 0377a21〕, and attainment of the fruits through the Buddha path benefit of fruit〔T223 0377a24〕 | The graphs for flower differ; the treatise further reinterprets them through emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle |
| 25 | 「行三十七道品將到無漏城。域有三門」 tr. “Practicing the thirty-seven factors of the path, one approaches the uncontaminated city; the domain has three gates”〔T1911 0090a28〕; 「聲聞緣空修三解脫;菩薩緣諸法實相修三解脫」 tr. “Śrāvakas cultivate the three liberations taking emptiness as object; bodhisattvas cultivate them taking the true mark of all dharmas as object”〔T1911 0090b28〕 | The Great Treatise, T1509, says the city of nirvāṇa has three gates〔T1509 0206a11〕. It also says 「是三解脫門,緣諸法實相」 tr. “These three gates of liberation take the true mark of all dharmas as their object”〔T1509 0207c18〕 and distinguishes the śrāvaka and bodhisattva use of the gates | The original graph in the treatise’s base text is “domain”; the śrāvaka-bodhisattva pair is condensed. The root-scripture referent of “without wisdom there is no dhyāna; without dhyāna there is no wisdom” remains under investigation |
| 26 | The treatise records that an old recension had 「若觀極微色,則有十八空。」 tr. “If one contemplates extremely subtle form, there are eighteen emptinesses”〔T1911 0090b12〕, while the current recension it saw had 「若觀一端疊,則有十八空。」 tr. “If one contemplates one end of cloth, there are eighteen emptinesses”〔T1911 0090b13〕 | The current Great Treatise, T1509, separately has extremely subtle form〔T1509 0147c16〕, cloth existing through conditions〔T1509 0147c18〕, and eighteen marks of emptiness within cloth〔T1509 0148a21〕 | This is Zhiyi’s record of variant readings in old and current treatise recensions; the current text does not place the two complete conditional sentences side by side |
| 27 | The Vaipulya citation has 「大空、小空皆歸一空。」 tr. “Great emptiness and small emptiness all return to one emptiness”〔T1911 0090c10〕; the Great Version citation has 「獨空」 tr. “solitary emptiness”〔T1911 0090c12〕 | “Vaipulya” is generic and has not been tied to a single work. The Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra, T374, has only a sentence near in meaning concerning great and small emptiness〔T374 0503c06〕. The Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra, T223, says 「般若波羅蜜示佛世間獨空」 tr. “The perfection of prajñā reveals that in the Buddha’s world there is solitary emptiness”〔T223 0326c27〕 | The referent of the first sentence remains under investigation; the title, T number, and current text of the second agree |
| 28 | 「《華嚴》日出先照高山」 tr. “In the Avataṃsaka, when the sun rises it first illuminates the high mountains”〔T1911 0090c20〕; 「《涅槃》遙指八千聲聞於《法華》中得記作佛,如秋收冬藏更無所作」 tr. “The Nirvāṇa remotely indicates that eight thousand śrāvakas receive predictions of buddhahood in the Lotus, like autumn harvest and winter storage, with nothing more to do”〔T1911 0090c26〕; 「即舉舍利弗六人,又別舉如來」 tr. “It then lists six people including Śāriputra and separately lists the Tathāgata”〔T1911 0090c28〕 | Avataṃsaka Sūtra, T278: 「譬如日出時,先照大山王,又復次第照,一切諸大山」 tr. “When the sun rises, it first illuminates the king of great mountains and then in sequence illuminates all the great mountains”〔T278 0618a14〕. Great Nirvāṇa Sūtra, T374: 「如《法花》中,八千聲聞,得受記莂成大果實,如秋收冬藏,更無所作」 tr. “As in the Lotus, eight thousand śrāvakas receive predictions and accomplish the great fruit, like autumn harvest and winter storage, with nothing more to do”〔T374 0420a23〕. It also successively lists Ānanda, Aniruddha, Kāśyapa, Subhūti, Maudgalyāyana, Śāriputra, and the Tathāgata〔T374 0545b19–0545c26〕, and separately says 「五種涅槃,謂色解脫,乃至識解脫」 tr. “Five kinds of nirvāṇa: liberation of form through liberation of consciousness”〔T374 0467b19〕 | The treatise uses the sunlight simile for the five periods. Graphic differences in the eight-thousand sentence are recorded. The six people and five liberations occur in different passages of the same scripture |
Six groups remain without a definite referent: “one should attain the path in reliance on the foundations of mindfulness,” “when the pure mind is constantly one, it can see prajñā,” “the path of nirvāṇa is easily attained,” “through diligent effort with one mind, one attains complete awakening,” “without wisdom there is no dhyāna / without dhyāna there is no wisdom,” and “great emptiness and small emptiness all return to one emptiness.” This records only that current materials do not identify a single work; it does not assert that any scripture is nonexistent.
4. Essential Explanations from the Fuxing [the Mirror]
The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue first judges discerning passage and obstruction through four meanings: horizontal, vertical, distinct horizontal, and one mind〔T1912 0357c01〕. Gain and loss differ through attachment and nonattachment. Even if the contemplated Dharma is originally correct, when attachment arises toward the contemplating faculty, that attached mind remains the same as deviance〔T1912 0357b09–18〕. Inspection therefore does not merely break an obvious obstruction; it prevents practitioners from producing another obstruction within a passage already gained.
After the six differing explanations, the Fuxing Chuanhong Jue marks the turn to three rounds of five hundred with 「今明下今家正解」 tr. “Beginning with ‘now clarify’ below is the correct explanation of our tradition”〔T1912 0358c05〕. The interweaving of horizontal and vertical uses warp and weft as its simile: 「竪三如經橫三如緯。織之令成三諦文章」 tr. “The three vertical are like warp and the three horizontal like weft; weave them to form the patterned text of the three truths”〔T1912 0359a04〕. Entering emptiness, emerging into the provisional, and contemplating the Middle must each still pass through Dharma, active faculty, object, truth, conditions, and perfections. Being named contemplation of the Middle does not exempt one from inspection.
The three kinds of bodhisattvas in the Great Perfection of Wisdom Sūtra are divided, moved, and reordered in the treatise. The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue explicitly records, 「今文所引開彼第三為第一第二。以第二為第三」 tr. “The present citation divides their third into first and second, and takes their second as third”〔T1912 0359c18〕. For the three similes of walking, horse, and superknowledge, Zhanran likewise records 「今此文中以步替羊」 tr. “In the present passage walking substitutes for sheep”〔T1912 0360a08〕. Both distinguish the form in which the treatise uses scripture; neither silently rewrites the treatise from the received text.
The passage on one mind first rejects horizontal and vertical separation, then clarifies the function of one mind〔T1912 0360a12〕. One mind possesses all three and thus breaks sequential separation among three contemplations; the three contemplations are only one mind and thus break horizontal separation〔T1912 0360b05–07〕. Yet if attachment arises again toward “neither passage nor obstruction,” it is still the obstruction of a distinct mark; inspection remains necessary to make the obstruction passable〔T1912 0360c13〕. The three alternate names therefore divide their work: passage and obstruction concern understanding, gain and loss practice, and word and nonword teaching〔T1912 0360c19–23〕.
Within regulation of the factors of the path, only mutual arising puts the seven groups into a regulated sequence. The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue says 「調停乃是諸品調試」 tr. “Regulation is the testing and adjustment of the various factors”〔T1912 0361b17〕. Contaminated factors of the path serve as preparatory means for the uncontaminated and are limited to regulation at the initial mind, where they can become causes for the uncontaminated at the first abode〔T1912 0361b23〕. Direct path and assisting path are not alternatives from which one may select only one. Zhanran states directly, 「今文意須有正助」 tr. “The intent of the present text requires both direct and assisting”〔T1912 0362a26〕.
The treatise extensively explains only the thirty-seven nonconstructed factors of the truth of the path. The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue judges them the direct intent of the passage and provisionally sets aside the other three kinds〔T1912 0362b24〕. It also says that three scriptures explain the earlier through each later one〔T1912 0362c02〕 and interprets the nonconstructed foundations of mindfulness by gathering one thought, one hundred realms and thousand suchnesses, and three thousand worlds into the three truths〔T1912 0362c21〕. The wording of the four foundations has before and after, but real contemplation does not go beyond one thought〔T1912 0362c25〕. The wording of the four right efforts appears sequential, while the intent is perfectly interfused〔T1912 0363b21〕.
The four bases of spiritual power belong to concentration, but only equal concentration and wisdom make concentration possessed of wisdom〔T1912 0363b29、0363c05〕. When the five faculties are cultivated again and grow, they receive the name five powers〔T1912 0364a12〕. The seven factors of awakening are regulated through quiescence and illumination, elimination and its counterpart, and diligence and its counterpart; mindfulness retains both groups of concentration and wisdom〔T1912 0364b05–07〕. Even when the Eightfold Path reaches the highest grade among these factors, the text still says it can be cultivated at the initial mind and is not yet discussing profound stages〔T1912 0364b09、0364c02〕.
In the simile of the tree of the path, the treatise correlates seed, sprout, root, stem and leaves, flower, and fruit with the factors but does not explicitly correlate the bases of spiritual power. The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue says 「文並闕如意。譬中應云莖幹上聳即如意足」 tr. “The text throughout omits spiritual power; the simile should say that the trunk rising upward is the bases of spiritual power”〔T1912 0364c16〕. This is Zhanran’s supplementation of an element in the simile and does not change the wording of the treatise.
There are multiple ways of correlating king and ministers with the three samādhis and three liberations. The Fuxing Chuanhong Jue says 「準望聖教不可專一。故並云或」 tr. “Measured against the noble teachings, one cannot insist on only one; therefore each is introduced with ‘or’”〔T1912 0365a10〕. In the Perfect Teaching, emptiness is itself signlessness and wishlessness, and one gate is all three〔T1912 0365b16–17〕. The intent of the three gates is not sequential, but one must still know the distinct features of the Tripiṭaka, Shared, Distinct, and Perfect teachings before contemplating their identity〔T1912 0365c21–23〕.
Zhanran judges the five periods at the end to be the five flavors〔T1912 0365c25〕. The passage on the twin trees lists six people and the Tathāgata〔T1912 0366b01〕, uses the five aggregates to establish five liberations〔T1912 0366b25〕, and then says that the three buddha-natures and six Dharmas are neither identical nor separate〔T1912 0366b27〕. These are line-by-line judgments of the Fuxing Chuanhong Jue and each remains on its own responsibility layer.
The Zhiguan Yili, T1913, outlines discerning passage and obstruction through 「三止三觀在一心中」 tr. “the three calming practices and three contemplations are within one mind”〔T1913 0451a05〕 and 「節節檢校」 tr. “inspect at every joint”〔T1913 0451a06〕, and says 「須用諸品展轉調停」 tr. “one must use the various factors to regulate one another in succession”〔T1913 0451a15〕. The Zhiguan Dayi, T1914, says 「於通起塞此塞須破。於塞得通此通須護」 tr. “When obstruction arises within passage, that obstruction must be broken; when passage is gained within obstruction, that passage must be protected”〔T1914 0460c22〕 and gathers the factors of the path through 「七科次第調試」 tr. “the seven groups are tested and adjusted in sequence”〔T1914 0460c28〕.
5. Explanations of Various Masters
In addition to the lineage’s line-by-line mirror in the Fuxing Chuanhong Jue, later Tiantai literature has three passages of direct reception. Their readings are recorded without adjudicating later sectarian disputes.
First, the Siming Shiyi Shu, T1936, marks the scope of the subsequent contemplation of the five aggregates with “after passage and obstruction”: 「但為通塞已去。通約五陰修觀故」 tr. “Only because after passage and obstruction contemplation is cultivated generally through the five aggregates”〔T1936 0840a10〕. It further says 「從此已去。乃至離愛。具約五陰」 tr. “From here onward through freedom from attachment, all is explained fully through the five aggregates”〔T1936 0840a12〕. This directly receives the unit’s position within the ten vehicles.
Second, the Record of Teachings and Practices of Venerable Siming, T1937, writes breaking attachment, seeking obstruction, and factors of the path in sequence: 「仗茲遍破執情」 tr. “Relying on this, pervasively break attached conceptions”〔T1937 0868b18〕, 「據此反尋塞著」 tr. “Based on this, turn back and seek obstructive attachment”〔T1937 0868b19〕, and 「道品因其。中適」 tr. “The factors of the path thereby suitably mediate”〔T1937 0868b20〕. The original graphs for “suitably mediate” are preserved. This witnesses continuous reception of the two vehicles without rewriting them into the treatise’s wording.
Third, the Outline of the Four Teachings of Tiantai, T1931, writes discerning passage and obstruction together with regulating the factors of the path: 「苦集。十二因緣。六蔽。塵沙。無明為塞。道滅。滅因緣智。六度。一心三觀為通。若通須護。有塞須破。於通起塞。能破如所破。節節撿校。名識通塞。」 tr. “Suffering and origination, the twelvefold dependent arising, six obstructions, dust-and-sand delusions, and ignorance are obstruction. Path and cessation, wisdom extinguishing dependent arising, six perfections, and the three contemplations in one mind are passage. Passage must be protected and obstruction broken. If obstruction arises within passage, what breaks becomes like what is broken. Inspection at every joint is called discerning passage and obstruction”〔T1931 0780c12–15〕; 「六道品調適。謂無作道品。一一調停隨宜而入。」 tr. “Sixth, regulating the factors of the path: namely, the nonconstructed factors of the path, each regulated so that entry occurs according to what is suitable”〔T1931 0780c15–17〕. This is continuous reception of the Dharma meanings of both vehicles.
6. Terminology
| Term | Usage in the treatise | Reading in the Fuxing Chuanhong Jue on the Mohe Zhiguan |
|---|---|---|
| Passage and obstruction; gain and loss; word and nonword | Three names with one purport, respectively concerning understanding, practice, and teaching〔0087b25–0087c02〕 | Gain and loss mean attachment and nonattachment; only teaching with both name and reality counts as knowing the word〔0360c19–23〕 |
| What breaks becomes like what is broken | If wisdom contemplating emptiness is attached to, what breaks itself turns into obstruction〔0086a21〕 | Though the contemplated Dharma is correct, an attached mind is the same as deviance〔0357b18〕 |
| Three rounds of five hundred | Five hundred are explained at each of three layers: places of birth-and-death, afflictions, and contemplative wisdom〔0086b28–0086c08〕 | The correct explanation of our tradition, using yojanas to explain passage and obstruction〔0358c05–0359a01〕 |
| Horizontal woven with vertical | Inspecting the three vertical—emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle—one by one through the three horizontal—truths, conditions, and perfections〔0086c08–0087a18〕 | Like warp and weft woven into the patterned text of the three truths〔0359a04〕 |
| Three contemplations in one mind; one mind in the three contemplations | One mind possessing emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle breaks vertical separation; the three contemplations not leaving one mind breaks horizontal separation〔0087b08–16〕 | One mind possesses three, and the three are only one〔0360b05–07〕 |
| Neither passage nor obstruction | Encountering everything as empty means no obstruction, and no obstruction means no passage; if another veil is raised here, it remains obstruction〔0087b14–24〕 | Attachment to neither passage nor obstruction still requires inspection〔0360c13〕 |
| Individually defined, mutually inclusive, according to stages, mutually arising | Four arrangements of the factors of the path; the first three do not regulate, while mutual arising alone is skillful regulation〔0087c09–23〕 | Mutual arising puts the seven groups in regulated sequence and tests the factors〔0361b16〕 |
| Direct and assisting | The factors of the path are sometimes called the direct path and sometimes assisting path〔0088a16–23〕 | Both direct and assisting meanings must be preserved here〔0362a26〕 |
| Nonconstructed factors of the path | The treatise does not fully record the other truths of the path, but extensively explains the thirty-seven nonconstructed factors〔0088b12〕 | The direct intent of the present text, with the other three set aside for now〔0362b24〕 |
| The Middle | The four foundations break the inversions of ordinary beings and the Two Vehicles, establish withered and flourishing together, then negate both withered and flourishing〔0088c17–0089b07〕 | Neither of the two extremes, yet not another substantial midpoint |
| Regulating the factors of the path | Mutual arising, moving to the next group when entry does not occur, and balancing buoyancy and sinking with the seven factors〔0087c20–0090a12〕 | Different name, same meaning, used as testing and adjustment〔0363b15〕 |
| Three samādhis; three liberations | Concentration and wisdom can be king and ministers according to whether wisdom arises from concentration or concentration from wisdom, and can also be treated together〔0090a27–0090b11〕 | No single correlation may be insisted upon; in the Perfect gates, emptiness is itself signlessness and wishlessness〔0365a10–0365b17〕 |
7. Similes · Cross-Reading · Carrying Forward
Discerning passage and obstruction uses removing a film from the eye while preserving its bright jewel and defeating bandits while protecting a good general, revealing that breaking obstruction does not destroy passage with it. The five hundred yojanas of the phantom city are divided into three rounds concerning places, afflictions, and contemplative wisdom, showing how the same dangerous road can be inspected through what is traversed, what is severed, and what contemplates. A keyhole that does not match the key’s teeth shows that a single linear correlation cannot reconcile the three rounds. Horizontal and vertical as warp and weft instead weave truths, conditions, and perfections together with emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle into a pattern that can be inspected at every point.
Walking, riding a horse, and superknowledge initially reveal the relative speed of the three contemplations, but the treatise immediately points out that three meanings separated in this way are still not its method. The three contemplations in one mind resemble traveling through empty space without descending from low ground, climbing heights, avoiding mountains, or following valleys. Yet if “neither passage nor obstruction” is grasped, passage turns back into obstruction. Insects eating wood and accidentally making the shape of written characters reveal the danger of possessing only the names of three contemplations without knowing their meaning.
The factors of the path use brewing wine as a simile for regulation: fermenting warmth and yeast must be properly balanced before preparatory means can become a cause of entry into principle. The nonconstructed four foundations of mindfulness then use the earth producing sprouts, twin trees withered and flourishing, and the secret treasury to organize breaking the eight inversions and entering the Middle Way. The tree of the path takes Dharma-nature as earth, foundations of mindfulness as seed, right efforts as sprout, five faculties as roots, five powers as stem and leaves, seven factors as flowers, and Eightfold Path as fruit. The omission of the bases of spiritual power identified by the Fuxing Chuanhong Jue is noted only in the mirror.
The three gates of liberation use king and ministers to reveal concentration and wisdom mutually assisting one another, and dream-events and the Dharma of sleep to reveal eighteen emptinesses returning to one emptiness. The closing sequence of sunlight first illuminating high mountains, four withered trees at Deer Park, the Vaipulya and Prajñā periods regulating the withered into flourishing, and the twin trees at the Crane Grove places the factors of the path within the sequence of a lifetime of teaching. Eight thousand śrāvakas receive predictions in the Lotus like autumn harvest and winter storage, revealing that sharp faculties can enter everywhere.
The Zhiguan Yili describes passage and obstruction as treating active grasping and the factors of the path as taking the foundations of mindfulness as substance. The Zhiguan Dayi joins breaking obstruction and protecting passage with testing and adjusting the seven groups. Cross-reading backward with pervasive breaking through Dharmas shows that passage and obstruction specifically inspects attachment in what actively breaks. Cross-reading forward with counteraction through aids to the path shows that when regulation through the factors remains insufficient, counteractive aids must separately assist opening. Within the whole treatise, this unit also carries forward the Lotus Sūtra’s phantom city, Buddha seed, and predictions for eight thousand, and the Golden Light Sūtra’s five corrects. It can be cross-read with the Lotus and Golden Light corpora without conflating their titles.
8. Placement of the Editions
This edition takes Taishō T1911 as its single base text. Whenever the source changes page, a 〔T46 page-column-line〕 anchor is placed at the beginning of the first paragraph on that page, using the nearest Taishō line marker before the paragraph’s first graph. The table records all eighteen critical notes within the unit. “Original” preserves the main text, “variant” the collated witness, and an omission is recorded as none. Daben is the Taishō base, Jiaben the Tokugawa printed copy formerly held by Shimaji Daitō and others, Gong the Song edition held by the Imperial Household Library, Hongwu the Southern Canon of the Hongwu era, and CB an electronic-edition addition or correction. The two occurrences of the graph for cloth are linked by one asterisk yet form two critical notes in the base text, so the denominator remains eighteen.
| No. | Line anchor | Original / witness | Variant / witness | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0086a13 | 上 [Daben] | 之上 [Jiaben] | Note within the interlinear fascicle-title marker |
| 2 | 0086b05 | 三 [Daben] | None [Jiaben] | |
| 3 | 0086b24 | 通 [CB][Gong-CB] | 道 [Daben] | Electronic-edition addition |
| 4 | 0087a03 | 意 [Daben] | 慧 [Jiaben] | |
| 5 | 0087c22 | 道 [Daben] | None [Jiaben] | |
| 6 | 0087c28 | 糵 [CB] | 蘖 [Daben] | Electronic-edition addition |
| 7 | 0088a09 | 明 [Daben] | None [Jiaben] | |
| 8 | 0088a22 | 也 [Daben] | None [Jiaben] | |
| 9 | 0088a26 | 皆 [Daben] | 皆是 [Jiaben] | |
| 10 | 0088a27 | 修 [Daben] | 經 [Jiaben] | |
| 11 | 0088b08 | 毘 [Daben] | None [Jiaben] | |
| 12 | 0088b20 | 一 [CB][Hongwu-CB][Jiaben] | 是 [Daben] | Electronic-edition correction |
| 13 | 0088c15 | 行 [Daben] | 想行 [Jiaben] | |
| 14 | 0090b13 | 疊 [Daben]* | 㲲 [Jiaben]* | First linked critical note |
| 15 | 0090b13 | 疊 [Daben]* | 㲲 [Jiaben]* | Second linked critical note |
| 16 | 0090c16 | 一 [Daben] | 一解脫 [Jiaben] | |
| 17 | 0090c29 | 弗 [Daben] | 弗等 [Jiaben] | |
| 18 | 0091a01 | 子 [Daben] | 子等 [Jiaben] |
Although the fascicle-title note precedes the first main-text paragraph, it lies within the unit’s designated range and is not removed from the denominator. Electronic corrections, Taishō originals, and witness variants are recorded at their respective responsibility layers without adjudicating superiority.