瑜伽師地論 白話全本 · 冊11

聲聞地 · 19 單元 · 第 1115 冊 · 冊目次

聲聞地 · 初瑜伽處 · 種姓地The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · The First Yoga-Station · The Stage of Lineage

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

聲聞地以四瑜伽處立,初瑜伽處先說種姓地。本門以四門攝種姓:自性·安立·諸相·數取趣〔補特伽羅〕。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;音寫名相偶以〔〕略示其指,嗢拕南壓縮處以〔〕補回所略。

〔彌勒菩薩說 · 三藏法師玄奘奉詔譯〕

聲聞地總標

修所成地已經說完了。什麼是聲聞地?統攝一切聲聞地的總攝頌〔嗢拕南〕說:

〔頌〕若簡略說這一地,以種姓等、補特伽羅〔數取趣,即有情〕為綱,隨其所應而安立世間道與出世間道。此地簡略有三分:種姓地、趣入地、以及出離想地〔「想」即名想、言說〕。這就名為聲聞〔地〕。

種姓地·四門總標

什麼是種姓地?其攝頌〔嗢拕南〕說:

〔頌〕若簡略說這一切種姓地,應知有四門:種姓自性、種姓安立、〔住種姓者的〕諸相、〔住種姓的〕補特伽羅〔數取趣〕。

就是說:種姓的自性、種姓的安立、安住於種姓者所有的諸相、以及安住種姓的補特伽羅——這一切總攝為一,就名為種姓地。

一、種姓自性

什麼是種姓?就是說:安住於種姓的補特伽羅,有一種「種子法」。由於這種子法現前實有的緣故,安住種姓的補特伽羅,若遇到殊勝的助緣,便有堪任〔能力〕、便有勢力,對於涅槃能夠獲得、能夠證得。

問:這「種姓」之名有什麼差別〔別名〕?答:或名為「種子」,或名為「界」,或名為「性」——這就是它的名稱差別。

問:如今這種姓以什麼為體?答:它附在所依〔身心〕之上,有如此這般的相狀,為六處〔六根〕所攝。它從無始以來輾轉相傳而來,是法爾〔自然本具,非造作所成〕所得的。在這上面安立種種別名,所謂種姓、種子、界、性。這就名為種姓。

二、種姓安立

什麼是種姓安立?就是應這樣問:如今這種姓,應當說它是「細」,還是說它是「麁」?應這樣答:是細。為什麼?因為這種子尚未能生果、尚未修習成果,所以名為細。若已生果、已修習成果,那時種姓無論是種〔因〕還是果,都說名為麁。

問:這樣的種姓,應說它墮於一個相續,還是墮於多個相續〔身心相續〕?答:應說墮於一個相續。為什麼?若是相狀互異之法,雖同時俱有而轉,卻見它們各自有種種相續、種種流轉〔那才墮多相續〕;而這種子並不是在六處之上另有別異的相狀,而就在如此的種類、分位之中,使六處〔較凡夫〕殊勝。它從無始輾轉傳來、法爾所得,於其上有如此的想與言說,稱為種姓、種子、界、性,所以應說它墮於一個相續。

三、四因緣,雖有涅槃法而不般涅槃

問:若安住種姓的補特伽羅本有涅槃法〔得入涅槃之性〕,那麼這位住種姓、有涅槃法的補特伽羅,是什麼因緣:既有涅槃法,卻從前際以來長時流轉、不入涅槃?

答:由四種因緣,不入涅槃。哪四種?一、生於無暇〔無閒暇之處〕的緣故;二、放逸的過失;三、邪解行的緣故;四、有障的過失。

什麼是生無暇?就是譬如有一類人,生在邊國,以及生在達須、蔑戾車〔邊地未開化之族〕當中,四眾〔出家在家男女〕、賢良、正至〔已得果者〕、善士都不前往遊化。這就名為生無暇。

什麼是放逸過?就是譬如有一類人,雖生在中國〔有佛法之地〕,或者並非達須、並非蔑戾車,四眾、賢良、正至、善士也都前往遊化;然而他生在富貴之家,財寶具足,對於種種妙欲耽著受用,不見其過患、不知出離。這就名為放逸過。

什麼是邪解行?就是譬如有一類人,雖生在中國,乃至〔如前〕廣說〔善士皆往遊涉〕;然而懷有外道的種種惡見。就是生起這樣的見、立這樣的論:「沒有施與〔布施無果〕」,廣說乃至「我自己了知再無後有」〔斷見〕。又由於這樣的外道見,不值遇諸佛出現世間,也沒有善友為他宣說正法。這就名為邪解行。

什麼是有障過?就是譬如有一類人,雖生在中國,如前廣說,也值遇諸佛出現於世、遇到善友為他宣說正法;然而他生性愚鈍,頑騃〔愚癡〕無知,又或瘖瘂〔不能言〕,只能以手代言,沒有能力了解善說、惡說的一切法義;或者又造作諸無間業;或者又長時生起諸煩惱。這就名為有障過。

如此就名為四種因緣。由於這些因緣,雖有般涅槃法,卻不入般涅槃。那人若值遇諸佛出世、聽聞正法、獲得隨順的教授教誡,沒有了那些〔障道〕因緣,那時才能善根成熟,漸次乃至得入般涅槃。至於無涅槃法的補特伽羅,安住於「決定聚」〔決定不能解脫之類〕:他無論遇緣、不遇緣,遍於一切種〔種種情況〕,畢竟不能得入般涅槃。

四、涅槃法之緣:勝緣與劣緣

問:什麼名為涅槃法之緣——說因為它「闕少、沒有、不會遇」的緣故,所以不入涅槃?

答:有二種緣。哪二種?一、勝〔緣〕,二、劣〔緣〕。

什麼是勝緣?就是「正法增上的他音」〔他人宣說正法之聲〕,以及「內在的如理作意」。

什麼是劣緣?這劣緣乃有許多種,就是:若自圓滿、若他圓滿、若善法欲、若正出家、若戒律儀、若根律儀、若於食知量、若初夜後夜常勤修習覺寤瑜伽、若正知而住、若樂遠離、若清淨諸蓋、若依三摩地。

(一)自圓滿(五支)

什麼是自圓滿?就是善得人身、生於聖處、諸根無缺、勝處淨信、離諸業障。

什麼名為善得人身?就是譬如有一類人,生在人同分中,得了丈夫身、男根成就;或者得了女身。如此名為善得人身。

什麼名為生於聖處?就是譬如有一類人,生在中國,如前廣說,乃至善士都前往遊化。如此名為生於聖處。

什麼名為諸根無缺?就是譬如有一類人,生性不愚鈍,也不頑騃,又不瘖瘂,乃至廣說支節無減〔肢體不殘缺〕。他由於這樣支節無缺、耳等諸根無缺,能在善品上精勤修集。如此名為諸根無缺。

什麼名為勝處淨信?就是譬如有一類人,對於諸如來正覺所說的法與毘奈耶〔律〕,得了清淨的信心。如此名為勝處淨信。所謂「勝處」,就是諸如來正覺所說的法與毘奈耶,能生一切世間、出世間的白淨法。在這上面所起的、為前導而增上的種種清淨信,名為勝處淨信,因為它能除遣一切所有的煩惱垢穢與染濁。

什麼名為離諸業障?就是能遠離五無間業,所謂在那害母、害父、害阿羅漢、破和合僧、於如來身上起惡心出血。隨有其中任何一種無間業障,若在現法〔今生〕之中不作、不行,如此名為離諸業障。若有人造作增長這五無間業,在現法中終究不能轉成、不能得入般涅槃、不能生起聖道;就針對那種人說「離諸業障」〔以反顯離障之要〕。唯由這樣五種支分,自體圓滿,所以說這名為自圓滿。

(二)他圓滿(五支)

什麼是他圓滿?就是諸佛出世、說正法教、法教久住、法住隨轉、他所哀愍。

什麼名為諸佛出世?就是譬如有一〔位菩薩〕,普於一切諸有情類起善利益的增上意樂,修習許多千的難行苦行,經三大劫阿僧企耶〔無數長劫〕,積集廣大的福德、智慧二種資糧;獲得最後上妙之身,安坐無上殊勝的菩提座,斷除五蓋,於四念住善能安住其心,修三十七菩提分法,現證無上正等菩提。如此名為諸佛出世。過去、未來、現在諸佛,都由如此而名為出世。

什麼名為說正法教?就是這樣的諸佛世尊出現於世,哀愍一切諸聲聞,依四聖諦,宣說真實的苦、集、滅、道無量法教,所謂契經、應頌、記別、諷誦、自說、因緣、譬喻、本事、本生、方廣、希法、論議〔十二分教〕。如此名為說正法教。諸佛世尊以及聖弟子、一切正士,都乘這正法而得出離,然後為他人宣說稱讚,所以說這名為正法;宣說此法的緣故,名為正法教。

什麼名為法教久住?就是說正法已、轉法輪已,乃至世尊壽量久住,以及涅槃之後,經過那麼長的時間,正行未減、正法未隱,如此名為正法久住。如此久住,應知是就那「勝義正法」作證的道理而說。

什麼名為法住隨轉?就是這樣證得正法的人,了知有能力能證如此正法的眾生,便就其所證,隨之轉教、隨順為他教授教誡。如此名為法住隨轉。

什麼名為他所哀愍?「他」就是施主。他對修行者起哀愍心,惠施隨順淨命的資具,所謂如法的衣服、飲食、種種坐臥具、病緣醫藥。如此名為他所哀愍。

(三)善法欲以下諸支

什麼是善法欲?就是譬如有一類人,或從佛所、或從弟子所,聽聞正法以後,獲得了清淨信。得淨信已,便應這樣學:「在家煩擾,若住塵世居所;出家閑曠,猶如身處虛空。所以我今應捨一切妻子眷屬、財穀珍寶,於善說的法與毘奈耶中,正捨家法、趣向非家〔出家〕。」既出家已,勤修正行、令得圓滿。在善法之中生起這樣的欲求,名為善法欲。

什麼是正出家?就是由這勝善法欲的增上力,以白四羯磨〔受戒法〕受具足戒;或者受勞策〔沙彌〕所學的尸羅〔戒〕。這就名為正出家。

什麼是戒律儀?就是他這樣正出家以後,安住於具足戒,堅牢地防護別解脫律儀,軌則、所行都得圓滿,於微小的罪也見為大怖畏,受學一切所有的學處。這就名為戒律儀。

什麼是根律儀?就是依這尸羅律儀,守護正念、修習常委之念〔恒常周密之念〕,以念防心、行於平等之位。眼見色已,而不取相、不取隨好〔不執總相別相〕;唯恐依此處〔六根門〕,由不修習眼根律儀防護而住,他的心便漏泄一切貪、憂、惡不善法,所以就在那處修律儀行、防護眼根,依眼根而修律儀行。如此而行者,耳聞聲已、鼻嗅香已、舌嘗味已、身覺觸已、意了法已,也都不取相、不取隨好;唯恐依此處,由不修習意根律儀防護而住,他的心便漏泄一切貪、憂、惡不善法,所以就在那處修律儀行、防護意根,依意根而修律儀行。這就名為根律儀。

什麼是於食知量?就是他這樣守護諸根以後,以正思擇而食所食:不為倡蕩〔放縱〕、不為憍逸、不為飾好、不為端嚴而食所食;然而所以食所食,是為了身體安住、為了暫時支持、為了除去飢渴、為了攝持梵行、為了斷除舊受〔故有的飢苦〕、為了使新受當來不更生起、為了存養體力而安樂無罪、安隱而住。如此名為於食知量。

什麼是初夜後夜常勤修習覺寤瑜伽?就是他這樣於食知量以後,在白晝時分,以經行、宴坐二種威儀,從隨順障道之法中淨修其心;在初夜時分,也以經行、宴坐二種威儀,從隨順障道之法中淨修其心。過了這初夜分以後,出住處外,洗濯雙足,右脇而臥、重累其足,安住光明想、正念、正知、思惟起想〔作將起之想〕;到夜後分,迅速覺寤〔醒起〕,又以經行、宴坐二種威儀,從隨順障道之法中淨修其心。如此名為初夜後夜常勤修習覺寤瑜伽。

什麼是正知而住?就是他這樣常勤修習覺寤瑜伽以後:若往、若來都正知而住,若覩、若瞻都正知而住,若屈、若伸都正知而住,持僧伽胝〔大衣〕及以衣鉢都正知而住,若食、若飲、若噉、若嘗都正知而住,若行、若住、若坐、若臥都正知而住,於覺寤時正知而住,若語、若默都正知而住,如解除勞睡〔小憩〕時也正知而住。如此名為正知而住。

什麼是樂遠離?就是由這樣所修的善法,無顛倒地修治初業地〔初學階位〕以後,遠離一切臥具的貪著,安住於阿練若〔空閑處〕、樹下、空室、山谷、峯穴、草藉、逈露〔露地〕、塚間、林藪、虛曠平野等邊際〔粗陋〕臥具〔之處〕。這就名為樂遠離。

什麼是清淨諸蓋?就是他這樣安住於阿練若、或樹下、或空室等處,於五種蓋淨修其心,所謂貪欲、瞋恚、惛沈睡眠、掉舉惡作、以及疑蓋。從那諸蓋淨修心已,心離諸蓋,安住於賢善的勝三摩地。如此名為清淨諸蓋。

什麼是依三摩地?就是他這樣斷除五蓋以後,便能遠離心的隨煩惱:遠離諸欲、惡不善法,有尋有伺、離〔欲界〕生喜樂,入初靜慮具足安住;尋伺寂靜、於內等淨、心一趣性、無尋無伺、定生喜樂,第二靜慮具足安住;遠離喜貪、安住於捨與念以及正知、身領受樂——這就是聖者所宣說的「捨、念具足、安樂而住」,第三靜慮具足安住;究竟斷樂、先已斷苦、喜憂俱沒、不苦不樂、捨念清淨,第四靜慮具足安住。如此名為依三摩地。

修集勝劣緣之結

他由如此漸次修行,後後轉勝、轉增、轉上,修集諸緣——從「初自圓滿」起,以「依三摩地」為最後——而得到如此心地清淨鮮白、無諸瑕穢、離隨煩惱、質直堪能、安住不動。若再獲得依四聖諦、為令〔對四諦〕遍知、永斷、作證、修習的他音教授教誡,便有如此的堪能勢力,發起如理所引的作意、以及以此為先的所有正見。由此便能於四聖諦入真現觀,圓滿解脫,於無餘依般涅槃界而般涅槃。

應知此中,從「正見」起,乃至「圓滿解脫、於無餘依般涅槃界而般涅槃」,這名為種性的真實修集。

從「自圓滿」起,乃至最後「依三摩地」,應知這名為修集劣緣。若依四諦法教而增上的所有教授教誡的他音,若如正理所引的作意,應知這名為修集勝緣。如此就名為種姓安立。

五、住種姓者的諸相(以無種姓相反顯)

什麼是住種姓者所有的諸相?就是與一切無涅槃法補特伽羅的諸相相違〔相反〕者,應知就名為安住種姓補特伽羅所有的諸相。

問:什麼名為無涅槃法補特伽羅所有的諸相——成就那些相,便應知說名為無涅槃法補特伽羅?答:無涅槃法補特伽羅有許多相,我今且說那相的少分〔一部分〕。

〔相一〕就是那最初不住種姓、無涅槃法的補特伽羅,阿賴耶愛〔對自體的深愛〕遍於一切種〔種種處〕都緊緊隨縛,附屬於所依〔身心〕,成為無量法、不可傾拔,久遠隨逐、畢竟堅固、依附相續,一切諸佛都不能救拔。這名為第一不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相。

〔相二〕又有其餘不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相:就是那人聽聞以無量門呵毀生死的眾多過失,又聽聞以無量門稱讚涅槃的眾多功德,然而對於生死不見少分的戲論過失、不見少分的所有過患,也不能少分厭離——這樣的「見〔過〕、厭〔離〕」,於過去世不曾已生、於未來世不能當生、於現在世不能正生;又對於愛盡寂滅的涅槃,不見少分的下劣功德〔意謂連粗淺的好處也不見〕、不見少分的所有勝利,也不能少分欣樂——這樣的「見〔利〕、樂〔求〕」,於過去世不曾已生、於未來世不能當生、於現在世不能正生。這名為第二不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相。

〔相三〕又有其餘不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相:就是那人本性成就上品的無慚、無愧。由這緣故,對〔惡〕無有厭惡、心無怯畏,以歡喜心現行眾惡;由這緣故,未曾追悔;唯觀現法〔只顧眼前〕;由這緣故,自身財寶衰退、招致過患。這名為第三不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相。

〔相四〕又有其餘不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相:就是當以一切種圓滿分明、稱當道理、美妙殊勝、易可解了的方式,或依苦諦、或依集諦、或依滅諦、或依道諦宣說開示正法教時,那人卻不能獲得微小的發心、微小的信解,何況能獲得身毛為竪、悲泣墮淚〔深受感動之相〕?如此〔不能感發〕也依過去、未來、現在三世而別。這名為第四不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相。

〔相五〕又有其餘不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相:就是那人或時於善說的法與毘奈耶中暫且出家——或為國王所逼迫,或為狂賊所逼迫,或為債主所逼迫,或為怖畏所逼迫,或為不活畏〔怕無以維生〕所逼迫;並非為了自調伏、非為自寂靜、非為自涅槃、非為沙門性、非為婆羅門性而求出家。既出家已,樂與在家及出家眾共相諠雜而住;或發邪願而修諸梵行,所謂求生天上、或求其餘天處;或樂於退捨所學的禁戒,或毀犯尸羅,內懷朽敗、外現真實,如同水中所生雜穢的蝸牛,發出螺音、行於狗行〔徒具其表〕——實非沙門,自稱沙門;非行梵行,自稱梵行。如此也依過去、未來、現在三世而別。應知這樣不住種姓的補特伽羅,是假相出家;不是那不樂學的補特伽羅〔反之,真出家者乃樂學者〕才名真出家——真出家者受具足戒、成就苾芻〔比丘〕之性。由這異門、由這意趣,義理顯示:那人本非出家,只是任持出家的相狀、墮在出家之數〔徒列出家之列〕罷了。這名為第五不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相。

〔相六〕又有其餘不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相:就是那人縱有少許所作的善業——或由於身、或由於語、或由於意——一切都是為了希求諸有〔三界果報〕:或求當來殊勝的後有,或求財寶,或求殊勝的所有財寶。這名為第六不住種姓補特伽羅的無種姓相。如此等類,有許多相;成就那些相,便墮在不般涅槃法之數。

六、安住種姓補特伽羅的差別

什麼是安住種姓的補特伽羅?就是說,住種姓的補特伽羅:或有唯住種姓,而未趣入、也未出離;或有安住種姓、也已趣入,而未出離;或有安住種姓、也已趣入、及已出離。或有軟根、或有中根、或有利根。或有貪行、或有瞋行、或有癡行。或生無暇、或生有暇。或有縱逸、或無縱逸。或有邪行、或無邪行。或有障礙、或無障礙。或遠、或近。或未成熟、或已成熟。或未清淨、或已清淨。

什麼名為安住種姓的補特伽羅唯住種姓、而未趣入、也未出離?就是譬如有一補特伽羅,成就了出世聖法的種子,而尚未獲得親近善士、聽聞正法,尚未於如來正覺正說的法與毘奈耶獲得正信,尚未受持淨戒,尚未攝受多聞,尚未增長慧捨〔慧與施捨〕,尚未調柔諸見。如此名為唯住種姓、而未趣入、也未出離的補特伽羅。

什麼名為安住種姓、也已趣入、而未出離的補特伽羅?就是前面所說的所有黑品〔過失之品〕相違的白品〔善淨之品〕,應知就名為安住種姓、也已趣入的補特伽羅。而其差別者,就是猶未證得所有的聖道及聖道果、煩惱的離繫〔解脫〕。

什麼名為安住種姓、也已趣入、及已出離的補特伽羅?就如前說,而其差別者,是已證得聖道及聖道果、煩惱的離繫。

什麼是軟根補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,對於所知事、所緣境界,所有諸根極為遲鈍運轉、微劣運轉——或與聞所成、或思所成、或修所成的作意相應,所謂或信根、或精進根、或念根、或定根、或慧根——沒有堪能、沒有勢力通達法義、速證真實。這名為軟根補特伽羅。

什麼是中根補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,對於所知事、所緣境界,所有諸根稍稍遲鈍運轉,一切如前〔軟根〕應當廣說。這名為中根補特伽羅。

什麼是利根補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,對於所知事、所緣境界,所有諸根不遲運轉、也不微劣運轉——或與聞所成、或思所成、或修所成的作意相應,所謂或信根、或精進根、或念根、或定根、或慧根——有所堪能、有大勢力通達法義、速證真實。這名為利根補特伽羅。

什麼是貪行補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,對於可愛事、可染著事的所緣境界,有猛利的貪、有長時的貪。這名為貪行補特伽羅。

什麼是瞋行補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,對於可憎事、可瞋恚事的所緣境界,有猛利的瞋、有長時的瞋。這名為瞋行補特伽羅。

什麼是癡行補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,對於所知事、所緣境界,有猛利的癡、有長時的癡。這名為癡行補特伽羅。

若生無暇、若有縱逸、若有邪行、若有障礙的補特伽羅,如此一切如前〔種種過失〕應知。與此相違者,應知就是生於有暇、無有縱逸、無有邪行、無有障礙的補特伽羅。

什麼名為遠補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,由於「時遠」的緣故,去涅槃遠;或又由於「加行遠」的緣故,說名為遠。

什麼名為由時遠故、去涅槃遠?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,要經多百生、或多千生、多百千生,然後才能值遇勝緣、得入般涅槃。

什麼名為加行遠故、說名為遠?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,唯住種姓、而未趣入,不能迅速值遇勝緣、得入般涅槃,因為他對於涅槃尚未能發起殊勝的加行。由「加行遠」而說名為遠,不是由「時遠」。如此二種〔時遠、加行遠〕總略為一,說名為遠補特伽羅。

什麼名為近補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,由於「時近」的緣故,去涅槃近;或又由於「加行近」的緣故,說名為近。

什麼名為由時近故、去涅槃近?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,住於最後生、住於最後有、住於最後身,即由此身當得涅槃;或即由此剎那無間,於煩惱斷當得作證。如此名為由時近故、去涅槃近。

什麼名為由加行近、說名為近?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,安住種姓、也已趣入。如此二種〔時近、加行近〕總略為一,說名為近補特伽羅。

什麼是未成熟補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,尚未能獲得最後有身——所謂住於此〔身〕能般涅槃,或能趣入正性離生〔見道〕。這名為未成熟補特伽羅。

什麼是已成熟補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,已能獲得最後有身——所謂住於此〔身〕能般涅槃,或能趣入正性離生。這名為已成熟補特伽羅。

什麼是未清淨補特伽羅?就是有這樣的補特伽羅,尚未生起聖道,於聖道果、煩惱的離繫尚未能作證。這名為未清淨補特伽羅。

什麼是已清淨補特伽羅?就是與上相違者,應知其相。如此就名為安住種姓補特伽羅所有的差別。

為了度脫他們,諸佛世尊出現於世:若未趣入,令他趣入;若未成熟,令他成熟;若未清淨,令他清淨;轉正法輪、制立學處。

The Śrāvaka Stage is set up in four yoga-stations, and the first yoga-station begins by expounding the Stage of Lineage. This gate gathers lineage under four sub-headings: intrinsic nature · establishment · characteristics · the person (pudgala). Technical terms are kept as in the old rendering, and every phrase is put into present-day language, without adding doctrinal exposition, without citing the treatises, without glossing the Sanskrit; where a transliterated term appears, its referent is sometimes indicated in brief within 〔 〕, and where the uddāna has compressed the wording, what was elided is restored within 〔 〕.

〔Spoken by the bodhisattva Maitreya · translated by the Tripiṭaka master Xuanzang at imperial command〕

The Overall Heading of the Śrāvaka Stage

The Stage of What is Attained through Cultivation has now been expounded in full. What is the Śrāvaka Stage? The gathering-verse 〔uddāna〕 that subsumes all of the Śrāvaka Stage says:

〔Verse〕If this stage is stated in brief, taking lineage and the rest, and the person 〔the pudgala, that is, the sentient being〕, as its main threads, it establishes — each according to what befits it — the mundane path and the supramundane path. This stage, stated in brief, has three parts: the Stage of Lineage, the Stage of Entry, and the Stage of the Conception of Emergence 〔"conception" means the naming-conception, that is, verbal designation〕. This is named the Śrāvaka 〔Stage〕.

The Stage of Lineage · The Overall Heading of the Four Sub-Headings

What is the Stage of Lineage? Its gathering-verse 〔uddāna〕 says:

〔Verse〕If this whole Stage of Lineage is stated in brief, it should be known to have four sub-headings: the intrinsic nature of lineage, the establishment of lineage, the characteristics 〔of one who dwells in lineage〕, and the person 〔the pudgala〕 〔who dwells in lineage〕.

That is to say: the intrinsic nature of lineage, the establishment of lineage, all the characteristics possessed by one who dwells in lineage, and the person who dwells in lineage — all of these gathered together as one is named the Stage of Lineage.

One · The Intrinsic Nature of Lineage

What is lineage? It is this: the person who dwells in lineage has a certain "seed-dharma." Because this seed-dharma is present and really existent, the person who dwells in lineage, should he meet with an excellent conducing condition, then has the fitness 〔the capacity〕 and then has the power to be able to attain and able to realize nirvāṇa.

Question: What are the differences 〔the other names〕 of this name "lineage"? Answer: It may be named "seed," or named "element," or named "nature" — these are the differences of its names.

Question: With what is this lineage now constituted as its substance? Answer: It adheres to the support 〔the body-and-mind〕, has such-and-such a character, and is subsumed under the six sense-fields 〔the six faculties〕. It has come down, transmitted onward and onward, from beginningless time, and is attained as a natural endowment 〔innately possessed of itself, not produced by contrivance〕. Upon it are set up various distinct names — namely lineage, seed, element, nature. This is named lineage.

Two · The Establishment of Lineage

What is the establishment of lineage? It is to be asked in this way: This lineage now — should it be said to be "fine," or should it be said to be "coarse"? It should be answered in this way: it is fine. Why? Because this seed is not yet able to yield a fruit and has not yet been cultivated into a fruit, it is therefore named fine. If it has already yielded a fruit and has already been cultivated into a fruit, then at that point the lineage, whether as seed 〔as cause〕 or as fruit, is both said to be named coarse.

Question: A lineage of this kind — should it be said to fall within a single continuum, or to fall within many continuums 〔body-and-mind continuums〕? Answer: It should be said to fall within a single continuum. Why? If it were a case of dharmas mutually differing in character, then, though they exist together and operate at the same time, one would still see each of them as having its own various continuums and various flowings-on 〔and that would be to fall within many continuums〕; but this seed does not have a character distinct and other upon the six sense-fields — rather, it is precisely within such a kind and phase that it makes the six sense-fields excellent 〔beyond those of the ordinary being〕. It has come down transmitted onward from beginningless time and is attained as a natural endowment; upon it there is such a conception and verbal designation, called lineage, seed, element, nature — and so it should be said to fall within a single continuum.

Three · The Four Causes and Conditions Whereby One Who Has the Dharma of Nirvāṇa Yet Does Not Attain Final Nirvāṇa

Question: If a person who dwells in lineage has, from the start, the dharma of nirvāṇa 〔the nature that gains entry into nirvāṇa〕, then this person who dwells in lineage and has the dharma of nirvāṇa — by what cause and condition is it that, though he has the dharma of nirvāṇa, he nonetheless flows on for a long time from the prior limit onward and does not enter nirvāṇa?

Answer: By four kinds of cause and condition, he does not enter nirvāṇa. Which four? First, because of being born into an unfree state 〔a place without leisure〕; second, the fault of heedlessness; third, because of wrong understanding-and-practice; fourth, the fault of being obstructed.

What is being born into an unfree state? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person born in a borderland, or born among the Dasyus and the Mlecchas 〔the border tribes, uncivilized〕, where the fourfold assembly 〔renunciant and lay, male and female〕, the worthy and good, the rightly-arrived 〔those who have already attained the fruit〕, and the virtuous never come to travel and teach. This is named being born into an unfree state.

What is the fault of heedlessness? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, though born in a central land 〔a place where the Buddha's Dharma is present〕, or though not among the Dasyus and not among the Mlecchas, and where the fourfold assembly, the worthy and good, the rightly-arrived, and the virtuous do come to travel and teach — nonetheless is born into a wealthy and noble family, with treasures complete, and clings to and indulges in the enjoyment of the various fine desires, seeing no danger in them and knowing no emergence from them. This is named the fault of heedlessness.

What is wrong understanding-and-practice? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, though born in a central land, and so on down to 〔as before〕 stated in full 〔the virtuous all coming to travel and range〕 — nonetheless harbors the various evil views of the outsiders. That is, he gives rise to such a view and sets up such a thesis: "There is no such thing as giving 〔giving bears no fruit〕," and so on stated in full down to "I myself understand that there is no further existence hereafter" 〔the annihilationist view〕. And on account of such an outsider's view, he does not meet the buddhas appearing in the world, nor is there a good friend to proclaim the true Dharma to him. This is named wrong understanding-and-practice.

What is the fault of being obstructed? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, though born in a central land, as stated in full before, and though he does meet the buddhas appearing in the world and encounters a good friend proclaiming the true Dharma to him — nonetheless is by nature dull and stupid, foolish and witless and without knowledge; or else is mute 〔unable to speak〕, able only to signal with his hands in place of speech, with no capacity to understand any of the meaning of the dharmas well spoken or ill spoken; or else again commits the deeds of immediate 〔retribution〕; or else again gives rise to the afflictions over a long time. This is named the fault of being obstructed.

Thus these are named the four kinds of cause and condition. By these causes and conditions, though he has the dharma of final nirvāṇa, he nonetheless does not attain final nirvāṇa. Should that person meet the buddhas appearing in the world, hear the true Dharma, and gain the concordant instruction and admonition, and should those 〔path-obstructing〕 causes and conditions be no more — then at that point his wholesome roots can ripen, and gradually, and at last, he can attain final nirvāṇa. As for the person who has no dharma of nirvāṇa, who dwells within the "fixed heap" 〔the class fixedly incapable of liberation〕: whether he meets conditions or does not meet conditions, throughout all kinds 〔of situations〕, he can never in the end attain final nirvāṇa.

Four · The Conditions for the Dharma of Nirvāṇa: The Excellent Condition and the Inferior Condition

Question: What is named a condition for the dharma of nirvāṇa — such that, because it is "deficient in, absent, or not met with," one does not enter nirvāṇa?

Answer: There are two kinds of condition. Which two? First, the excellent 〔condition〕; second, the inferior 〔condition〕.

What is the excellent condition? It is "the voice of another, dominant in the true Dharma" 〔the sound of another proclaiming the true Dharma〕, together with "inward attention in accord with principle."

What is the inferior condition? This inferior condition is of many kinds, namely: self-perfection; other-perfection; the desire for wholesome dharmas; right going-forth into homelessness; the discipline of moral restraint; the discipline of the faculties; knowing the right measure in food; being ever diligent in the practice of the yoga of wakefulness in the first and last watches of the night; dwelling with right knowing; delighting in seclusion; the purifying of the hindrances; and relying upon meditative concentration.

(1) Self-Perfection (Five Members)

What is self-perfection? It is: gaining a human body well, being born in a noble place, having the faculties unimpaired, pure faith toward the excellent object, and being free of the karmic obstructions.

What is named gaining a human body well? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person born within the human company, who gains the body of a man, with the male faculty complete; or else who gains a woman's body. This is named gaining a human body well.

What is named being born in a noble place? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person born in a central land, as stated in full before, down to the virtuous all coming to travel and teach. This is named being born in a noble place.

What is named having the faculties unimpaired? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who is by nature not dull and stupid, also not foolish and witless, and again not mute, down to being stated in full as having his limbs and joints undiminished 〔the body not maimed〕. Because he thus has limbs and joints unimpaired, and the ear and the other faculties unimpaired, he is able to strive diligently to cultivate and gather within the wholesome class. This is named having the faculties unimpaired.

What is named pure faith toward the excellent object? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, toward the Dharma and the Vinaya 〔the discipline〕 spoken by the Tathāgatas, the Fully Awakened Ones, gains a pure faith. This is named pure faith toward the excellent object. As for "the excellent object": it is the Dharma and the Vinaya spoken by the Tathāgatas, the Fully Awakened Ones, which are able to generate all the pure-and-white dharmas, mundane and supramundane. The various pure faith arising upon it, as a forerunner and as dominant, is named pure faith toward the excellent object, because it is able to expel and remove all the defiling filth and pollution of the afflictions.

What is named being free of the karmic obstructions? It is being able to keep far from the five deeds of immediate 〔retribution〕, namely, in that case, the killing of one's mother, the killing of one's father, the killing of an arhat, the splitting of the harmonious Saṅgha, and, upon the body of a Tathāgata, giving rise to an evil mind and drawing blood. Should there be any one among these deeds of immediate obstruction, if in the present dharma 〔this present life〕 one does not do it and does not carry it out, this is named being free of the karmic obstructions. If someone commits and increases these five deeds of immediate 〔retribution〕, in the present dharma he can in the end not become able and not able to attain final nirvāṇa, and not able to give rise to the noble path; it is with regard to that kind of person that "being free of the karmic obstructions" is spoken 〔setting off, by contrast, how vital it is to be free of obstruction〕. It is solely by these five members that the self-substance is perfected, and so this is said to be named self-perfection.

(2) Other-Perfection (Five Members)

What is other-perfection? It is: the buddhas appearing in the world; the speaking of the teaching of the true Dharma; the long endurance of the teaching of the Dharma; the teaching-abiding and its being handed on accordingly; and being an object of another's compassion.

What is named the buddhas appearing in the world? It is like this: there is a certain one 〔a bodhisattva〕 who, universally toward all classes of sentient being, gives rise to the dominant resolve of wholesome benefit; who cultivates many thousands of difficult and ascetic practices; who, over three great eons of incalculable 〔length〕 〔the innumerable long eons〕, gathers the vast two provisions of merit and of wisdom; who gains the last, fine and excellent body, sits at the unsurpassed and superlative seat of awakening, severs the five hindrances, is well able to settle his mind upon the four foundations of mindfulness, cultivates the thirty-seven factors of awakening, and directly realizes the unsurpassed, right and perfect awakening. This is named the buddhas appearing in the world. The buddhas past, future, and present are all, by this very course, named as appearing in the world.

What is named the speaking of the teaching of the true Dharma? It is: such buddhas, the world-honored ones, appearing in the world, out of compassion for all the śrāvakas, relying on the four noble truths, proclaim the true teaching of the Dharma of suffering, origin, cessation, and path in immeasurable measure — namely, the discourses, the mingled prose-and-verse, the prophecies, the verses, the spontaneous utterances, the circumstantial accounts, the parables, the accounts of past events, the birth-stories, the extensive teachings, the marvels, and the expositions 〔the twelvefold division of the teaching〕. This is named the speaking of the teaching of the true Dharma. The buddhas, the world-honored ones, together with the noble disciples and all the true persons, all ride upon this true Dharma and gain emergence, and thereafter proclaim and extol it to others, and so this is said to be named the true Dharma; because this Dharma is proclaimed, it is named the teaching of the true Dharma.

What is named the long endurance of the teaching of the Dharma? It is: having spoken the true Dharma and turned the wheel of the Dharma, down through the World-Honored One's abiding for the length of his life span, and after his nirvāṇa, throughout that great length of time, the right practice is not diminished and the true Dharma is not hidden — this is named the long endurance of the true Dharma. Such long endurance should be known to be spoken with regard to the principle of realizing that "true Dharma in the ultimate sense."

What is named the teaching-abiding and its being handed on accordingly? It is: one who has thus realized the true Dharma, knowing that there are beings with the capacity to be able to realize such true Dharma, then, in accord with what he has realized, hands on the teaching accordingly and, conforming to them, gives them instruction and admonition. This is named the teaching-abiding and its being handed on accordingly.

What is named being an object of another's compassion? "Another" is the donor. He gives rise to a mind of compassion toward the practitioner and bestows the requisites concordant with pure livelihood, namely, robes in accord with the Dharma, food and drink, the various sitting-and-lying furnishings, and medicine for the occasion of illness. This is named being an object of another's compassion.

(3) The Desire for Wholesome Dharmas and the Members That Follow

What is the desire for wholesome dharmas? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, whether from the Buddha or from a disciple, having heard the true Dharma, gains a pure faith. Having gained the pure faith, he should then train in this way: "The household life is vexing and cramped, like dwelling in a dusty abode; going forth is open and free, as though the body dwelt in empty space. Therefore I should now cast off all wife and children and kin, wealth and grain and precious things, and, within the well-spoken Dharma and Vinaya, rightly cast off the household state and turn toward the homeless 〔go forth〕." Having gone forth, he diligently cultivates right practice and brings it to perfection. To give rise to such a desire within the wholesome dharmas is named the desire for wholesome dharmas.

What is right going-forth into homelessness? It is: by the dominant force of this excellent desire for wholesome dharmas, receiving the full precepts by the white-and-fourfold motion 〔the ordination procedure〕; or receiving the moral discipline 〔the precepts〕 to be trained in by a novice 〔a śrāmaṇera〕. This is named right going-forth into homelessness.

What is the discipline of moral restraint? It is: he, having thus rightly gone forth, dwells in the full precepts, firmly guarding the discipline of individual liberation, with rule and range brought to perfection, and, toward even a minute offense, seeing it as a great terror, receiving and training in all the points of training. This is named the discipline of moral restraint.

What is the discipline of the faculties? It is: relying upon this moral discipline, guarding right mindfulness, cultivating a constant and close mindfulness 〔a mindfulness ever-abiding and minute〕, guarding the mind with mindfulness, and coursing in the station of equanimity. Having seen a form with the eye, he does not grasp its overall mark and does not grasp its features 〔he does not seize upon the general mark or the particular mark〕; fearing only that, in dependence on this station 〔the gate of the six faculties〕, by not cultivating the guarding-discipline of the eye-faculty and so dwelling, his mind should leak out all greed, sorrow, and evil unwholesome dharmas — therefore, at that very station he cultivates the practice of discipline and guards the eye-faculty, cultivating the practice of discipline in dependence on the eye-faculty. One who thus practices, having heard a sound with the ear, having smelled a scent with the nose, having tasted a flavor with the tongue, having felt a touch with the body, having cognized a dharma with the mind — likewise does not grasp their overall mark and does not grasp their features; fearing only that, in dependence on this station, by not cultivating the guarding-discipline of the mind-faculty and so dwelling, his mind should leak out all greed, sorrow, and evil unwholesome dharmas — therefore, at that very station he cultivates the practice of discipline and guards the mind-faculty, cultivating the practice of discipline in dependence on the mind-faculty. This is named the discipline of the faculties.

What is knowing the right measure in food? It is: he, having thus guarded the faculties, eats the food he eats with right discernment: he eats the food he eats not for wanton indulgence 〔dissipation〕, not for arrogance, not for adornment, not for a fine appearance; rather, the reason he eats the food he eats is for the sake of the body's abiding, for the sake of momentary support, for the sake of removing hunger and thirst, for the sake of upholding the practice of purity, for the sake of severing the old feeling 〔the pre-existing distress of hunger〕, for the sake of not letting a new feeling arise again in the future, and for the sake of nourishing his strength so as to dwell blamelessly at ease and dwell securely. This is named knowing the right measure in food.

What is being ever diligent in the practice of the yoga of wakefulness in the first and last watches of the night? It is: he, having thus known the right measure in food, in the daytime purifies his mind of the dharmas that conduce to obstruction by the two postures of walking meditation and seated meditation; in the first watch of the night, likewise purifies his mind of the dharmas that conduce to obstruction by the two postures of walking meditation and seated meditation. Having passed this first watch, he goes outside his dwelling place, washes his two feet, and lies down on his right side, laying his feet one upon the other, dwelling in the conception of light, in right mindfulness, in right knowing, and in the conception of rising 〔the conception of being about to rise〕; and at the last watch of the night he swiftly wakes 〔rouses himself〕 and again purifies his mind of the dharmas that conduce to obstruction by the two postures of walking meditation and seated meditation. This is named being ever diligent in the practice of the yoga of wakefulness in the first and last watches of the night.

What is dwelling with right knowing? It is: he, having thus ever diligently practiced the yoga of wakefulness: whether going or coming, he dwells with right knowing; whether looking straight ahead or looking about, he dwells with right knowing; whether bending or stretching, he dwells with right knowing; carrying the outer robe 〔the great robe〕 and also the robes and bowl, he dwells with right knowing; whether eating, drinking, chewing, or tasting, he dwells with right knowing; whether walking, standing, sitting, or lying, he dwells with right knowing; at the time of being awake, he dwells with right knowing; whether speaking or silent, he dwells with right knowing; and at the time of relieving fatigue by sleep 〔a brief rest〕, likewise he dwells with right knowing. This is named dwelling with right knowing.

What is delighting in seclusion? It is: by the wholesome dharmas thus cultivated, having without error cultivated and cleansed the ground of the beginner 〔the beginner's stage〕, he keeps far from all clinging to bedding, and dwells at the marginal 〔rough〕 bedding 〔places〕 of the āraṇya 〔the free and open place〕, beneath a tree, in an empty room, in a mountain valley, in a peak-cave, on a grass mat, in the open 〔in the open air〕, in a charnel ground, in a forest thicket, on the empty broad level plain. This is named delighting in seclusion.

What is the purifying of the hindrances? It is: he, thus dwelling in the āraṇya, or beneath a tree, or in an empty room and such places, purifies his mind of the five kinds of hindrance, namely sensual desire, ill-will, dullness-and-drowsiness, restlessness-and-remorse, and the hindrance of doubt. Having purified his mind of those hindrances, his mind is freed of the hindrances and dwells in the wholesome and excellent meditative concentration. This is named the purifying of the hindrances.

What is relying upon meditative concentration? It is: he, having thus severed the five hindrances, then is able to keep far from the secondary afflictions of the mind: keeping far from the desires and the evil unwholesome dharmas, with applied thought and with sustained thought, with the joy and bliss born of seclusion 〔from the desire realm〕, he enters and fully abides in the first meditative absorption; with applied and sustained thought stilled, with inward serene clarity, with the mind's single-pointed continuity, without applied thought and without sustained thought, with the joy and bliss born of concentration, he fully abides in the second meditative absorption; keeping far from the craving for joy, abiding in equanimity and in mindfulness and also in right knowing, with the body experiencing bliss — this being what the noble ones proclaim as "abiding at ease, complete in equanimity and mindfulness" — he fully abides in the third meditative absorption; with bliss ultimately severed, with suffering already severed before, with joy and sorrow both sunk away, with neither-suffering-nor-bliss, with equanimity and mindfulness purified, he fully abides in the fourth meditative absorption. This is named relying upon meditative concentration.

The Conclusion on Cultivating and Gathering the Excellent and Inferior Conditions

By thus practicing gradually, more and more excellent, more and more increasing, more and more advancing later and later, he cultivates and gathers the conditions — beginning from "self-perfection at the first" and taking "relying upon meditative concentration" as the last — and gains such a mind-ground pure and white and bright, free of all flaw and defilement, freed of the secondary afflictions, straightforward and capable, abiding and unshaken. Should he further gain the voice of another giving instruction and admonition — relying on the four noble truths, for the sake of causing 〔the four truths〕 to be fully known, forever severed, realized, and cultivated — then he has such a capacity and power to give rise to the attention drawn forth in accord with principle, and to all the right view of which this is the forerunner. By this he is then able, toward the four noble truths, to enter the true direct realization, to be perfectly liberated, and to attain final nirvāṇa in the realm of nirvāṇa without remaining basis.

It should be known that herein, from "right view" onward, down to "perfect liberation, and the attainment of final nirvāṇa in the realm of nirvāṇa without remaining basis" — this is named the true cultivating-and-gathering of lineage.

From "self-perfection" onward, down to the last, "relying upon meditative concentration," it should be known that this is named the cultivating-and-gathering of the inferior conditions. And the voice of another that is dominant in accord with the teaching of the four truths — all the instruction and admonition — and the attention drawn forth in accord with right principle: it should be known that this is named the cultivating-and-gathering of the excellent conditions. Thus this is named the establishment of lineage.

Five · The Characteristics of One Who Dwells in Lineage (Set Off by Contrast Through the Marks of No Lineage)

What are all the characteristics possessed by one who dwells in lineage? It is: whatever is contrary 〔the opposite〕 to all the characteristics of the person who has no dharma of nirvāṇa should be known to be named the characteristics possessed by the person who dwells in lineage.

Question: What is named all the characteristics possessed by the person who has no dharma of nirvāṇa — such that, accomplishing those characteristics, one should be known to be named the person who has no dharma of nirvāṇa? Answer: The person who has no dharma of nirvāṇa has many characteristics; I will now state a lesser portion 〔a part〕 of those characteristics.

〔Characteristic One〕It is this: that person who, from the very first, does not dwell in lineage and has no dharma of nirvāṇa — the craving for the store-consciousness 〔the deep craving for one's own substance〕 tightly binds him throughout all kinds 〔all stations〕, is subordinate to the support 〔the body-and-mind〕, becomes measureless dharmas that cannot be uprooted, follows along from afar, is in the end firm and solid, and clings to and adheres to the continuum — all the buddhas cannot rescue him from it. This is named the first mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage.

〔Characteristic Two〕Further, there is the other mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage: it is this — that person hears through immeasurable gateways the many faults of birth-and-death reviled, and hears through immeasurable gateways the many virtues of nirvāṇa extolled, yet toward birth-and-death he sees not the least portion of the fault of idle proliferation and sees not the least portion of any danger, nor is he able to feel the least portion of weariness — such "seeing 〔the fault〕 and wearying 〔of it〕" neither has already arisen in a past life, nor can arise in a future life, nor can rightly arise in the present life; and again, toward the nirvāṇa of the exhaustion of craving and stilling, he sees not the least portion of even its lowly virtue 〔meaning he sees not even its coarse and shallow good〕 and sees not the least portion of any benefit, nor is he able to feel the least portion of delight — such "seeing 〔the benefit〕 and delighting 〔in seeking it〕" neither has already arisen in a past life, nor can arise in a future life, nor can rightly arise in the present life. This is named the second mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage.

〔Characteristic Three〕Further, there is the other mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage: it is this — that person is by nature accomplished in shamelessness and non-embarrassment of the highest grade. Because of this, he has no aversion toward 〔evil〕 and his mind has no timidity or fear, and with a delighting mind he carries out the many evils; because of this, he has never any remorse; he regards only the present dharma 〔he cares only for what is before his eyes〕; because of this, his own person's treasures decline and he brings danger upon himself. This is named the third mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage.

〔Characteristic Four〕Further, there is the other mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage: it is this — when, in every way complete and clear, fitting to principle, fine and excellent, easy to understand, one proclaims and reveals the teaching of the true Dharma, whether in reliance on the truth of suffering, or on the truth of origin, or on the truth of cessation, or on the truth of the path, that person nonetheless is not able to gain the least resolve, the least faith-and-understanding — how much less able to gain the hair of his body standing on end, or grieving and weeping and shedding tears 〔the mark of being deeply moved〕? Such 〔inability to be moved and stirred〕 likewise differs according to the three times of past, future, and present. This is named the fourth mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage.

〔Characteristic Five〕Further, there is the other mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage: it is this — that person may at some time go forth for a while within the well-spoken Dharma and Vinaya — whether pressed by a king, or pressed by a raging bandit, or pressed by a creditor, or pressed by terror, or pressed by the fear of not making a living 〔the fear of having no means to survive〕; and not for the sake of self-taming, not for self-stilling, not for self-nirvāṇa, not for the state of the renunciant, not for the state of the brahmin does he seek to go forth. Having gone forth, he delights in dwelling in noisy commotion together with lay and renunciant crowds; or he gives rise to a wrong vow and cultivates the practices of purity, namely seeking birth in a heaven, or seeking some other heavenly place; or he delights in casting off and abandoning the disciplinary precepts he has trained in, or he violates the moral discipline, harboring rot and decay within, presenting the true and real without — like the foul and filthy snail born in the water, uttering a conch-tone and coursing in the coursing of a dog 〔with the mere semblance and nothing more〕 — truly not a renunciant, yet calling himself a renunciant; not practicing the practice of purity, yet calling it the practice of purity. Such likewise differs according to the three times of past, future, and present. It should be known that a person of this kind, who does not dwell in lineage, has gone forth in mere semblance; it is not the person who does not delight in training 〔on the contrary, the one who truly goes forth is the one who delights in training〕 who is named as truly gone forth — the one who truly goes forth receives the full precepts and accomplishes the state of a bhikṣu 〔a fully ordained monk〕. By this alternative approach, by this intent, the meaning is revealed: that person is by his very ground not one gone forth, but merely upholds the semblance of going-forth and falls within the number of the gone-forth 〔is listed, for nothing, among the gone-forth〕. This is named the fifth mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage.

〔Characteristic Six〕Further, there is the other mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage: it is this — that person, even if he does some slight wholesome deed — whether by body, or by speech, or by mind — does it all for the sake of longing after existences 〔the fruits of the three realms〕: either seeking an excellent future existence, or seeking treasures, or seeking excellent treasures of every kind. This is named the sixth mark of no lineage of the person who does not dwell in lineage. Of such a kind there are many characteristics; accomplishing those characteristics, one falls within the number of those who have no dharma of final nirvāṇa.

Six · The Distinctions Among the Persons Who Dwell in Lineage

What is the person who dwells in lineage? It is to say: the person who dwells in lineage — there may be one who only dwells in lineage, but has not yet entered and has not yet emerged; or one who dwells in lineage and has also entered, but has not yet emerged; or one who dwells in lineage, has also entered, and has also emerged. There may be one of soft faculties, or one of middling faculties, or one of sharp faculties. There may be one whose coursing is greed, or whose coursing is hatred, or whose coursing is delusion. There may be one born into an unfree state, or one born into a free state. There may be one heedless, or one not heedless. There may be one of wrong practice, or one of no wrong practice. There may be one obstructed, or one unobstructed. There may be one far, or one near. There may be one not yet ripened, or one already ripened. There may be one not yet purified, or one already purified.

What is named the person who dwells in lineage but only dwells in lineage, and has not yet entered and has not yet emerged? It is like this: there is a certain person who has accomplished the seed of the supramundane noble Dharma, yet has not yet gained the drawing-near to a virtuous one and the hearing of the true Dharma, has not yet gained right faith toward the Dharma and Vinaya rightly spoken by the Tathāgatas, the Fully Awakened Ones, has not yet received and upheld the pure precepts, has not yet taken in much learning, has not yet increased wisdom and generosity 〔wisdom and giving〕, and has not yet made supple his views. This is named the person who only dwells in lineage, and has not yet entered and has not yet emerged.

What is named the person who dwells in lineage and has also entered, but has not yet emerged? It is: all the white class 〔the wholesome and pure class〕 that is contrary to the black class 〔the class of faults〕 spoken of before should be known to be named the person who dwells in lineage and has also entered. And its distinction is: that he has still not yet realized any of the noble path and the fruit of the noble path, and the detachment 〔liberation〕 from the afflictions.

What is named the person who dwells in lineage, has also entered, and has also emerged? It is as stated before, and its distinction is that he has already realized the noble path and the fruit of the noble path, and the detachment from the afflictions.

What is the person of soft faculties? It is: there is such a person, toward the object known and the objective realm, whose faculties all operate exceedingly slowly and operate weakly — whether associated with the attention constituted by hearing, or that constituted by reflection, or that constituted by cultivation, namely the faith faculty, the effort faculty, the mindfulness faculty, the concentration faculty, or the wisdom faculty — without capacity, without power to penetrate the meaning of the dharmas and swiftly realize the true. This is named the person of soft faculties.

What is the person of middling faculties? It is: there is such a person, toward the object known and the objective realm, whose faculties all operate somewhat slowly, all as before 〔for soft faculties〕 to be stated in full. This is named the person of middling faculties.

What is the person of sharp faculties? It is: there is such a person, toward the object known and the objective realm, whose faculties all operate not slowly and do not operate weakly — whether associated with the attention constituted by hearing, or that constituted by reflection, or that constituted by cultivation, namely the faith faculty, the effort faculty, the mindfulness faculty, the concentration faculty, or the wisdom faculty — with capacity, with great power to penetrate the meaning of the dharmas and swiftly realize the true. This is named the person of sharp faculties.

What is the person whose coursing is greed? It is: there is such a person, toward the objective realm of things lovable and things to be tainted with, who has fierce greed, has greed for a long time. This is named the person whose coursing is greed.

What is the person whose coursing is hatred? It is: there is such a person, toward the objective realm of things hateful and things to be angered at, who has fierce hatred, has hatred for a long time. This is named the person whose coursing is hatred.

What is the person whose coursing is delusion? It is: there is such a person, toward the object known and the objective realm, who has fierce delusion, has delusion for a long time. This is named the person whose coursing is delusion.

As for the person born into an unfree state, the one heedless, the one of wrong practice, or the one obstructed — all of these should be known as before 〔with the various faults〕. Whatever is contrary to this should be known to be the person born into a free state, not heedless, of no wrong practice, and unobstructed.

What is named the far person? It is: there is such a person who, because of "farness in time," is far from nirvāṇa; or else who, because of "farness in effort," is said to be named far.

What is named being far from nirvāṇa because of farness in time? It is: there is such a person who must pass through many hundreds of births, or many thousands of births, or many hundreds of thousands of births, and only then can meet with the excellent condition and attain final nirvāṇa.

What is named being said to be far because of farness in effort? It is: there is such a person who only dwells in lineage but has not yet entered, and cannot swiftly meet with the excellent condition and attain final nirvāṇa, because he has not yet been able to give rise to an excellent effort toward nirvāṇa. He is said to be named far by "farness in effort," not by "farness in time." Thus these two kinds 〔farness in time and farness in effort〕 gathered together in brief as one are named the far person.

What is named the near person? It is: there is such a person who, because of "nearness in time," is near to nirvāṇa; or else who, because of "nearness in effort," is said to be named near.

What is named being near to nirvāṇa because of nearness in time? It is: there is such a person who dwells in the last birth, dwells in the last existence, dwells in the last body, and by this very body is to attain nirvāṇa; or by this very instant, without interval, is to realize the severance of the afflictions. This is named being near to nirvāṇa because of nearness in time.

What is named being said to be near because of nearness in effort? It is: there is such a person who dwells in lineage and has also entered. Thus these two kinds 〔nearness in time and nearness in effort〕 gathered together in brief as one are named the near person.

What is the person not yet ripened? It is: there is such a person who has not yet been able to gain the body of the last existence — namely, dwelling in this 〔body〕 he can attain final nirvāṇa, or can enter the right certainty of freedom from birth 〔the path of seeing〕. This is named the person not yet ripened.

What is the person already ripened? It is: there is such a person who has already been able to gain the body of the last existence — namely, dwelling in this 〔body〕 he can attain final nirvāṇa, or can enter the right certainty of freedom from birth. This is named the person already ripened.

What is the person not yet purified? It is: there is such a person who has not yet given rise to the noble path, and, toward the fruit of the noble path and the detachment from the afflictions, has not yet been able to realize it. This is named the person not yet purified.

What is the person already purified? It is: whatever is contrary to the above — its characteristics should be known. Thus this is named all the distinctions possessed by the persons who dwell in lineage.

In order to deliver them, the buddhas, the world-honored ones, appear in the world: those not yet entered, they cause to enter; those not yet ripened, they cause to ripen; those not yet purified, they cause to be purified; they turn the wheel of the true Dharma and set up the points of training.

聲聞地 · 初瑜伽處 · 趣入地The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · First Yoga-Station · Entry

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

種姓地說「本有」的種子,趣入地說那種子怎樣「發動」上道。仍以四門攝:趣入自性·安立·〔已趣入者〕諸相·〔已趣入〕補特伽羅。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;嗢拕南壓縮處以〔〕補回所略。

趣入地·四門總標

種姓地已經說完了。什麼是趣入地?攝頌〔嗢拕南〕說:

〔頌〕若簡略說一切趣入地,應知有四門:趣入自性、趣入安立、〔已趣入者的〕諸相、〔已趣入的〕補特伽羅(數取趣)。

就是說:趣入的自性、趣入的安立、趣入者所有的諸相、以及已趣入的補特伽羅——這一切總攝為一,名為趣入地。

一、趣入自性

什麼是趣入自性?就是安住於種姓的補特伽羅,本性成就涅槃的種子。若在那時有佛出世,他又生在中國、不生在達須、蔑戾車當中,乃至廣說——最初得以見佛及佛弟子,前往承事,從他們聞法,得了最初的正信、受持淨戒、攝受多聞、增長惠捨〔施捨〕、調柔諸見。從此以後,由這「法受」〔領受正法〕、由這因緣,此身滅壞、度過此生之後,獲得六處異熟所攝的殊勝諸根,能長時作「轉勝正信」生起的依止;也能使他那受持淨戒、攝受多聞、增長惠捨、調柔諸見,轉上、轉勝、轉復微妙,而為所依止。又由這樣轉上、轉勝、轉復微妙的信等諸法,更得其餘殊勝的異熟;由這異熟,又得其餘隨順出世的轉勝善法。如此展轉互為依因、互與勢力,於後後生轉轉勝進,乃至獲得最後有身——所謂住於此〔身〕得般涅槃,或能趣入正性離生〔見道〕。這就名為趣入。

為什麼?若是「道」、若是「路」、若是「正行跡」,能得涅槃、能趣涅槃;他在那時,能昇、能入、能正行履,漸次趣向,到達至極究竟。所以說這名為已趣入。如此名為趣入自性。

二、建立趣入

什麼是建立趣入?就是說:或有〔唯〕種姓,或有趣入,或有將成熟,或有已成熟。〔合而為四句:〕或有唯趣入,非將成熟、非已成熟;或有也趣入、也將成熟,非已成熟;或有也趣入、也已成熟,非將成熟;或有非趣入、非將成熟、非已成熟。

什麼是有種姓?就如前〔種姓地〕所說。

什麼是有趣入?就是住種姓的補特伽羅,最初獲得了往昔未曾得的——對諸如來正覺正說的法與毘奈耶,所有的正信、受持淨戒、攝受多聞、增長惠捨、調柔諸見。這就名為趣入。

什麼是將成熟?就是這樣已得趣入的補特伽羅,除去「所獲得最後有身」〔那一階〕——所謂住於此得般涅槃、或能趣入正性離生〔那是已成熟〕;從趣入以後,於後後生修集諸根,轉上、轉勝、轉復微妙。這就名為將成熟。

什麼是已成熟?就是所獲得的最後有身。若住於此得般涅槃,或能趣入正性離生。這就名為已成熟。

什麼是唯趣入,非將成熟、非已成熟?就是最初獲得對諸如來正覺正說法毘奈耶所有的正信,廣說乃至調柔諸見;而未從此之後再經一生。這就名為唯趣入,非將成熟、非已成熟。

什麼是也趣入、也將成熟,非已成熟?就是最初獲得對諸如來正覺正說法毘奈耶所有的正信,廣說乃至調柔諸見;從此以後,又經一生、或二、或多,而未獲得最後有身——所謂住於此得般涅槃。其餘如前所說。這就名為也趣入、也將成熟,非已成熟。

什麼是也趣入、也已成熟,非將成熟?就是這樣已得趣入的補特伽羅,又已獲得最後有身。若住於此得般涅槃,其餘如前所說。這就名為也已趣入、也已成熟,非將成熟。什麼是非已趣入、非將成熟、非已成熟?就是這樣有涅槃法的補特伽羅,唯住種姓,而未趣入。這就名為非已趣入、非將成熟、非已成熟的補特伽羅——然而他有堪能,定當趣入、當得成熟。

又有一類補特伽羅,定無堪能當得趣入、當得成熟,就是離了種姓、無涅槃法的補特伽羅。應知這樣的補特伽羅,因無種姓,定無堪能當得趣入及當成熟,何況當能得般涅槃?

三、六位補特伽羅

應知此中,這樣一切補特伽羅,為六位所攝。哪六位?一、有堪能補特伽羅,二、成就下品善根補特伽羅,三、成就中品善根補特伽羅,四、成就上品善根補特伽羅,五、究竟方便補特伽羅,六、已到究竟補特伽羅。

什麼是堪能補特伽羅?就是安住種姓的補特伽羅,而尚未獲得最初對佛正覺正說法毘奈耶所有的正信,廣說乃至調柔諸見。這就名為堪能補特伽羅。

什麼是成就下品善根補特伽羅?就是安住種姓的補特伽羅,已能獲得最初對佛正覺正說法毘奈耶所有的正信,廣說乃至調柔諸見。這就名為成就下品善根補特伽羅。

什麼是成就中品善根補特伽羅?就是安住種姓的補特伽羅,已能獲得最初對佛正覺正說法毘奈耶所有的正信,廣說乃至調柔諸見;從此以後,或經一生、或二、或多,展轉勝進,而未獲得最後有身——所謂住於此能般涅槃,或能趣入正性離生。這就名為成就中品善根補特伽羅。

什麼是成就上品善根補特伽羅?就是這樣展轉勝進的補特伽羅,已能獲得最後有身。若住於此能般涅槃,或能趣入正性離生。這就名為成就上品善根補特伽羅。

什麼名為究竟方便補特伽羅?就是已獲得最後有身的補特伽羅,為了盡諸漏而聽聞正法,或得無顛倒的教授教誡,正修加行,而尚未能得遍一切種諸漏永盡,未到究竟。如此名為究竟方便補特伽羅。

什麼名為已到究竟補特伽羅?就是這樣的補特伽羅,為盡諸漏而聽聞正法、獲得無顛倒的教授教誡,如此這般正修加行,已能獲得遍一切種諸漏永盡,所作已辦,究竟獲得第一清涼。如此名為已到究竟補特伽羅。

應知此中:堪能種類的補特伽羅,即以種姓為依為住,便能獲得下品善根,並能趣入;既趣入已,以下品善根為依為住,又能獲得中品善根,以此善根而自成熟;他這樣自成熟時,以中品善根為依為住,又能獲得上品善根,已得成熟;他由這樣上品善根修集為因所得的自體,又能修集轉勝的資糧。由此觸證心一境性〔定〕,又能趣入正性離生,證預流果、或一來果、或不還果,而尚未能證最殊勝第一的阿羅漢果——如此名為究竟方便補特伽羅。若已證得一切煩惱皆悉永斷的阿羅漢果,那時名為已到究竟補特伽羅。這就顯示:由初、中、後一切聲聞所修的正行,所立的六種補特伽羅。

由「有種姓」的聲聞正行,顯示最初的補特伽羅;由「到究竟」的聲聞正行,顯示最後的補特伽羅;由其餘聲聞所修的正行,顯示中間的補特伽羅。

四、趣入安立(得般涅槃無定量·三生七有)

問:已得趣入的補特伽羅,是有定量、一切時都齊等地得般涅槃?還是無定量、一切時分而不齊等地得般涅槃?

答:沒有定量,也不是一切時分齊等地得般涅槃,而是隨其所應、如所遇緣有差別而般涅槃。應知此中,或有一類極經久遠,或有一類非極久遠,或有一類最極速疾得般涅槃。所謂住種姓的補特伽羅,最極速疾般涅槃的,也要經三生:第一生中,最初趣入;第二生中,修令成熟;第三生中,修成熟已——或即此身得般涅槃,或若不得般涅槃的,必入學位〔有學〕方可夭沒,至多經七有〔七番生死〕得般涅槃。

如此名為趣入安立。

五、已趣入者所有諸相(八相)

什麼名為已趣入者所有的諸相?

〔相一〕就是安住種姓的補特伽羅纔一趣入,縱使轉到別的生中,於自己的大師〔佛〕及善說的法與毘奈耶中,雖偶有妄念〔忘失〕:若遇世間現有的惡說法毘奈耶、與善說的法毘奈耶,雖久聽人以無量門讚美惡說法毘奈耶有殊勝功德,他卻不信解、不愛樂修行,也不於彼求出家;即使暫且出家,纔一趣入便很快棄捨退還——天性對那惡法不樂安住,如同蜜中所生的蟲,把牠放進釅酢〔濃醋〕裡;又如貪愛受用妙欲的人,把他放進淤泥中〔處之難安〕。他由宿世妙善因力的任持,若暫聽人讚美善說法毘奈耶的少分功德、或全然未聞,雖只暫少聞、或全未聞,卻能很快信解趣入、愛樂修行、或求出家;既出家已,畢竟趣入、終無退轉——天性對此愛樂安住,如同蜜中所生的蟲,把牠放進上等的蜜裡;又如貪愛受用妙欲的人,把他放進殊勝的妙欲中〔處之安樂〕。他由宿世妙善因力的任持。這就名為第一、已得趣入補特伽羅的已趣入相。

〔相二〕又有其餘已得趣入補特伽羅的已趣入相:就是雖未得「能往一切惡趣、無暇」的煩惱離繫〔斷盡〕,卻已能不生惡趣、無暇。世尊依這已得趣入的補特伽羅,密意說言:若有世間上品正見,雖歷千生不墮惡趣。他若已入上品善根、漸向成熟,那時便能不生無暇及其餘惡趣。這就名為第二相。

〔相三〕又有其餘相:就是暫聞佛、或法、或僧的殊勝功德,便得隨念清淨的信心,引發廣大的出離善法;數數緣念、融練淨心,身遂毛竪、悲泣雨淚。這就名為第三相。

〔相四〕又有其餘相:就是天性成就猛利的慚愧,於所現行的諸有罪處,深生羞恥。這就名為第四相。

〔相五〕又有其餘相:就是於受持、讀誦、請問、思惟、觀行、求善法之中,有深厚欲樂、猛利欲樂。這就名為第五相。

〔相六〕又有其餘相:就是於一切無罪的事業、修集一切善品加行的正方便中,能善加修集,堅固發起、長時發起、決定發起。這就名為第六相。

〔相七〕又有其餘相:就是他天性塵垢微薄、煩惱羸劣,雖起諸纏〔現行煩惱〕,卻不長時相續久住;無諂、無誑,能制伏憍慢與我我所執;好取功德、憎背過失。這就名為第七相。

〔相八〕又有其餘相:就是能善巧地藏護其心,於諸廣大所應證之處不自輕蔑,不把自己安處在「無力能」之中,他的信解增多猛盛。這就名為第八相。

如此等類,已得趣入補特伽羅的已趣入相,應知無量,我於此中已說少分。如此諸相:若有安住下品善根而趣入的,當知是下品,名「有間隙」,未能無間〔不能相續不斷〕,未善清淨;若有安住中品善根而趣入的,當知是中品;若有安住上品善根而趣入的,當知是上品,無有間隙、已能無間、已善清淨。

如此名為已得趣入補特伽羅的已趣入相。成就如此趣入相的,當知墮在「已趣入」之數。應知這樣安住種姓、已得趣入的補特伽羅,所有眾多的吉祥士相,唯有佛世尊及到第一究竟的弟子,以善清淨的勝妙智見,現見現證;隨其種姓、隨所趣入,如其所應而救濟。

六、已得趣入補特伽羅(差別)

什麼名為已得趣入補特伽羅?就是說:或有已得趣入的補特伽羅,唯已趣入,未將成熟、未已成熟、未得出離;或有也已趣入、也將成熟,未已成熟、未得出離;或有也已趣入、也已成熟,未得出離、隨欲而行。如此差別,應知如前已辨其相。

又有其餘的,如種姓地所說軟根等補特伽羅的所有差別,如今在此中,如其所應,也當了知所有差別。

如此所說:若趣入自性、若趣入安立、若已趣入者所有諸相、若已趣入補特伽羅,一切總說名為趣入地。

Where the Lineage Stage speaks of the seed that is "there from the outset," the Entry Stage speaks of how that seed is "set going" onto the path. It is still gathered under four gates: the intrinsic nature of entry · its establishment · the marks of 〔those who have entered〕 · the persons 〔who have entered〕. Terms are kept as of old, rendered clause by clause into today's language, without adding doctrine, without citing the treatises, without annotating the Sanskrit; where the summary verse (uddāna) compresses, what was abridged is restored within 〔brackets〕.

The Four Gates of the Entry Stage · General Heading

The Lineage Stage has now been fully expounded. What is the Entry Stage? The summary verse 〔uddāna〕 says:

〔Verse〕 If one states all of the Entry Stage in brief, it should be known to have four gates: the intrinsic nature of entry, the establishment of entry, the marks 〔of those who have entered〕, and the persons 〔who have entered〕 (the pudgala, "those who repeatedly take up a destiny").

That is: the intrinsic nature of entry, the establishment of entry, all the marks belonging to those who enter, and the persons who have already entered — all of this, gathered together into one, is named the Entry Stage.

One · The Intrinsic Nature of Entry

What is the intrinsic nature of entry? It is the person who abides in the lineage, in whom the seeds of nirvāṇa are constituted by their very nature. If, at that time, a Buddha has arisen in the world, and this person is furthermore born in a central country and not born among the Daśyus or the Mlecchas, and so on at length — then, for the first time, he is able to see a Buddha and the Buddha's disciples, goes forth to attend upon them, and hears the Dharma from them; and he gains, for the first time, right faith, upholds the pure precepts, takes on much learning, increases his generosity 〔giving〕, and softens his views. From then on, by this "receiving of the Dharma" 〔receiving the true Dharma〕, and by this cause and condition, once this body has perished and this life has been passed through, he obtains the excellent faculties subsumed under the maturation of the six sense-fields, faculties that can for a long time serve as the support for the arising of a "still more excellent right faith"; and they also cause his upholding of the pure precepts, his taking on of much learning, his increase of generosity, and his softening of views to turn higher, turn more excellent, and turn yet more subtle, serving thereby as the support. And by these ever higher, ever more excellent, ever more subtle phenomena of faith and the rest, he gains yet other excellent maturations; and by these maturations, he again gains yet other excellent wholesome phenomena conducive to the supramundane. In this way, serving in turn as one another's supporting cause and lending one another force, in each later and later birth he advances turn by turn, until he obtains a body in his final existence — that is, one abiding in this 〔body〕 who attains final nirvāṇa, or one who is able to enter the certainty of rightness 〔the path of seeing〕. This is named entry.

Why? Because if there is a "way," if there is a "road," if there is a "right course of conduct" that can attain nirvāṇa and can proceed toward nirvāṇa; then this person, at that time, is able to ascend, able to enter, able to conduct himself rightly along it, advancing step by step, reaching the utmost final consummation. Therefore it is said that this is named having entered. In this way is named the intrinsic nature of entry.

Two · The Establishment of Entry

What is the establishment of entry? It is stated: there is one who 〔only〕 has the lineage, there is one who has entered, there is one who is about to be ripened, and there is one who has already been ripened. 〔Combined, this makes four alternatives:〕 there is one who has only entered, who is neither about to be ripened nor already ripened; there is one who has both entered and is about to be ripened, but is not already ripened; there is one who has both entered and is already ripened, but is not about to be ripened; and there is one who has neither entered, nor is about to be ripened, nor is already ripened.

What is one who has the lineage? It is just as was stated before 〔in the Lineage Stage〕.

What is one who has entered? It is the person abiding in the lineage who, for the first time, has obtained what was never obtained in times past — namely, toward the Dharma and Vinaya rightly awakened to and rightly proclaimed by the Tathāgatas, all of the right faith, upholding of the pure precepts, taking on of much learning, increase of generosity, and softening of views. This is named entry.

What is one who is about to be ripened? It is this person who has thus already gained entry, setting aside "the obtaining of a body in the final existence" 〔that one stage〕 — namely, one abiding in this who attains final nirvāṇa, or one able to enter the certainty of rightness 〔that is the already-ripened〕; who, from entry onward, in each later and later birth cultivates and gathers the faculties, so that they turn higher, turn more excellent, turn yet more subtle. This is named being about to be ripened.

What is one who is already ripened? It is the obtaining of a body in the final existence. Whether one abides in this and attains final nirvāṇa, or is able to enter the certainty of rightness. This is named being already ripened.

What is one who has only entered, who is neither about to be ripened nor already ripened? It is one who, for the first time, has obtained toward the Dharma and Vinaya rightly awakened to and rightly proclaimed by the Tathāgatas all of the right faith — stated at length down to the softening of views — but who has not, from this point on, passed through even one further birth. This is named having only entered, neither about to be ripened nor already ripened.

What is one who has both entered and is about to be ripened, but is not already ripened? It is one who, for the first time, has obtained toward the Dharma and Vinaya rightly awakened to and rightly proclaimed by the Tathāgatas all of the right faith — stated at length down to the softening of views — and who, from this point on, has passed through one further birth, or two, or many, but has not obtained a body in the final existence — namely, one abiding in this who attains final nirvāṇa. The rest is as stated before. This is named having both entered and being about to be ripened, but not already ripened.

What is one who has both entered and is already ripened, but is not about to be ripened? It is this person who has thus already gained entry, and who has furthermore already obtained a body in the final existence. If he abides in this and attains final nirvāṇa, the rest is as stated before. This is named having both already entered and being already ripened, but not about to be ripened. What is one who has neither already entered, nor is about to be ripened, nor is already ripened? It is such a person possessing the property of nirvāṇa who abides only in the lineage but has not yet entered. This is named the person who has neither already entered, nor is about to be ripened, nor is already ripened — yet he has the capacity, and will certainly enter and will attain ripening.

There is, further, a class of person who definitely has no capacity to attain entry or to attain ripening — namely, the person apart from the lineage, without the property of nirvāṇa. It should be known that such a person, being without the lineage, definitely has no capacity to attain entry or to attain ripening — how much less to be able to attain final nirvāṇa?

Three · The Six Classes of Person

It should be known that herein, all such persons are subsumed under six classes. Which six? First, the person with capacity; second, the person who has accomplished the lower grade of wholesome roots; third, the person who has accomplished the middle grade of wholesome roots; fourth, the person who has accomplished the higher grade of wholesome roots; fifth, the person of the final means; sixth, the person who has arrived at the final consummation.

What is the person with capacity? It is the person abiding in the lineage who has not yet obtained, for the first time, toward the Dharma and Vinaya rightly awakened to and rightly proclaimed by the Buddha, all of the right faith — stated at length down to the softening of views. This is named the person with capacity.

What is the person who has accomplished the lower grade of wholesome roots? It is the person abiding in the lineage who has already been able to obtain, for the first time, toward the Dharma and Vinaya rightly awakened to and rightly proclaimed by the Buddha, all of the right faith — stated at length down to the softening of views. This is named the person who has accomplished the lower grade of wholesome roots.

What is the person who has accomplished the middle grade of wholesome roots? It is the person abiding in the lineage who has already been able to obtain, for the first time, toward the Dharma and Vinaya rightly awakened to and rightly proclaimed by the Buddha, all of the right faith — stated at length down to the softening of views; and who, from this point on, whether passing through one birth, or two, or many, advances turn by turn, but has not obtained a body in the final existence — namely, one abiding in this who is able to attain final nirvāṇa, or is able to enter the certainty of rightness. This is named the person who has accomplished the middle grade of wholesome roots.

What is the person who has accomplished the higher grade of wholesome roots? It is this person, thus advancing turn by turn, who has already been able to obtain a body in the final existence. If he abides in this and is able to attain final nirvāṇa, or is able to enter the certainty of rightness. This is named the person who has accomplished the higher grade of wholesome roots.

What is named the person of the final means? It is the person who has already obtained a body in the final existence, who, in order to exhaust all the contaminants, listens to the true Dharma, or gains the unerring instruction and admonition, and rightly cultivates the intensified practice, but has not yet been able to attain the utter and total exhaustion, throughout every kind, of all the contaminants — has not yet arrived at the final consummation. In this way is named the person of the final means.

What is named the person who has arrived at the final consummation? It is such a person who, in order to exhaust all the contaminants, listens to the true Dharma, gains the unerring instruction and admonition, and, cultivating the intensified practice in just this way, has already been able to attain the utter and total exhaustion, throughout every kind, of all the contaminants; whose task is done, and who has finally attained the foremost coolness. In this way is named the person who has arrived at the final consummation.

It should be known that herein: the person of the capable kind, taking the lineage itself as his support and abode, then becomes able to obtain the lower grade of wholesome roots, and is able to enter; and having entered, taking the lower grade of wholesome roots as his support and abode, he becomes able again to obtain the middle grade of wholesome roots, and by these wholesome roots ripens himself; when he has thus ripened himself, taking the middle grade of wholesome roots as his support and abode, he becomes able again to obtain the higher grade of wholesome roots, and has attained ripening; by the self-body thus obtained as fruit of cultivating and gathering the higher grade of wholesome roots, he is able again to cultivate and gather the still more excellent provisions. Thereby he touches and realizes one-pointedness of mind 〔concentration〕, and is able again to enter the certainty of rightness, realizing the fruit of stream-entry, or the fruit of once-returning, or the fruit of non-returning, but has not yet been able to realize the most excellent, the foremost fruit of the arhat — in this way is named the person of the final means. If he has already realized the fruit of the arhat, in which all the afflictions are wholly and forever cut off, then he is named the person who has arrived at the final consummation. This displays: the six kinds of person established by the right conduct cultivated by all the śrāvakas of the beginning, the middle, and the end.

By the right conduct of the śrāvaka "having the lineage," the first person is displayed; by the right conduct of the śrāvaka "having arrived at the final consummation," the last person is displayed; by the right conduct cultivated by the remaining śrāvakas, the intermediate persons are displayed.

Four · The Establishment of Entry (Attaining Final Nirvāṇa Has No Fixed Measure · Three Births, Seven Existences)

Question: Does the person who has already gained entry attain final nirvāṇa by a fixed measure, at all times uniformly? Or does he attain final nirvāṇa by no fixed measure, unevenly across all periods of time?

Answer: There is no fixed measure, nor is it uniformly across all periods of time that he attains final nirvāṇa; rather, he attains final nirvāṇa according to what is fitting, with differences according to the conditions met. It should be known that herein, there is one class that passes through an extremely long duration, one class that passes through a not-extremely-long duration, and one class that attains final nirvāṇa with the utmost speed. That is, of persons abiding in the lineage, even the one who attains final nirvāṇa with the utmost speed must still pass through three births: in the first birth, he enters for the first time; in the second birth, he cultivates so as to ripen; in the third birth, having cultivated to ripeness — either he attains final nirvāṇa in this very body, or, if he does not attain final nirvāṇa, he must enter the stage of the learner 〔the trainee〕 before he can pass away, and at the most passes through seven existences 〔seven rounds of birth-and-death〕 before attaining final nirvāṇa.

In this way is named the establishment of entry.

Five · All the Marks Belonging to Those Who Have Entered (the Eight Marks)

What is named all the marks belonging to those who have entered?

〔Mark One〕 It is that the person abiding in the lineage, the moment he enters, even though he passes over into another birth, in regard to his own great teacher 〔the Buddha〕 and the well-proclaimed Dharma and Vinaya, though he may on occasion have false recollection 〔forgetting〕: should he meet a badly-proclaimed Dharma and Vinaya present in the world, and a well-proclaimed Dharma and Vinaya, then, though he long hears others praise, through countless gateways, the badly-proclaimed Dharma and Vinaya as possessing excellent virtues, he still does not believe or understand it, does not delight in cultivating it, and does not seek to go forth into homelessness therein; and even if he goes forth for a while, the moment he enters he very quickly casts it off and turns back — his nature does not delight in abiding in that bad Dharma, like an insect born in honey that is placed into strong vinegar 〔thick vinegar〕; or like one who loves to enjoy fine sense-pleasures who is placed into mire 〔ill at ease therein〕. Yet, sustained by the force of the fine and wholesome causes of former lives, should he hear others for a while praise even a small portion of the virtues of the well-proclaimed Dharma and Vinaya, or hear nothing at all, then — though he hears but a little for a while, or hears nothing at all — he is able very quickly to believe, understand, and enter, to delight in cultivating it, or to seek to go forth; and having gone forth, he enters to the very end, never turning back — his nature delights in abiding therein, like an insect born in honey that is placed into the finest honey; or like one who loves to enjoy fine sense-pleasures who is placed among excellent fine sense-pleasures 〔at ease and joyful therein〕. This is sustained by the force of the fine and wholesome causes of former lives. This is named the first — the mark of entry of the person who has already gained entry.

〔Mark Two〕 There is, further, another mark of entry of the person who has already gained entry: it is that, although he has not yet gained the freedom from the bond 〔the utter cutting-off〕 of the afflictions "that can lead to all evil destinies and the unfavorable conditions," he is already able not to be born into an evil destiny or an unfavorable condition. The World-Honored One, with a hidden intent regarding this person who has already gained entry, spoke, saying: If there is right view of the higher grade in the world, then though one passes through a thousand births, one does not fall into an evil destiny. When he has already entered the higher grade of wholesome roots and gradually approaches ripening, at that time he is able not to be born into an unfavorable condition or into any other evil destiny. This is named the second mark.

〔Mark Three〕 There is, further, another mark: it is that, hearing for a while the excellent virtues of the Buddha, or the Dharma, or the Saṅgha, he gains the faith of remembrance and purity, drawing forth the vast wholesome dharmas of renunciation; and, dwelling on them again and again and refining his pure mind, his body then bristles with hair on end, and he weeps aloud with tears raining down. This is named the third mark.

〔Mark Four〕 There is, further, another mark: it is that his nature is accomplished in fierce conscience and shame, so that in regard to the places of offense that come to be enacted, he gives rise to deep shame. This is named the fourth mark.

〔Mark Five〕 There is, further, another mark: it is that, in upholding, reciting, inquiring, reflecting, contemplative practice, and seeking the wholesome Dharma, he has deep desire and delight, fierce desire and delight. This is named the fifth mark.

〔Mark Six〕 There is, further, another mark: it is that, in all blameless undertakings, and in the right means of cultivating and gathering the intensified practice of all wholesome categories, he is able to cultivate and gather well, giving rise to it firmly, giving rise to it over a long time, giving rise to it with resolve. This is named the sixth mark.

〔Mark Seven〕 There is, further, another mark: it is that his nature is thin in dust and grime, weak in affliction; even when he gives rise to the enwrappings 〔the actively-arisen afflictions〕, they do not continue and abide for a long time; he is without flattery and without deceit, able to subdue arrogance and the grasping at "I" and "mine"; he is fond of taking up virtues and averse to faults. This is named the seventh mark.

〔Mark Eight〕 There is, further, another mark: it is that he is able skillfully to store and protect his mind, does not belittle himself in regard to the vast things to be realized, does not settle himself into "being without the strength and capacity," and his faith and understanding grow abundant and fierce. This is named the eighth mark.

Marks of this kind and class, the marks of entry of the person who has already gained entry, should be known to be immeasurable; herein I have stated but a small portion. As for these marks: if there is one who abides in the lower grade of wholesome roots and enters, it should be known that he is of the lower grade, named "having gaps," not yet able to be without interval 〔not able to be unbroken and continuous〕, not yet well purified; if there is one who abides in the middle grade of wholesome roots and enters, it should be known that he is of the middle grade; if there is one who abides in the higher grade of wholesome roots and enters, it should be known that he is of the higher grade, without gaps, already able to be without interval, already well purified.

In this way is named the marks of entry of the person who has already gained entry. One who has accomplished such marks of entry, it should be known, falls within the number of "those who have entered." It should be known that, of the person thus abiding in the lineage who has already gained entry, all the many auspicious marks of a great being — these only the Buddha, the World-Honored One, and the disciples who have arrived at the foremost final consummation, with well-purified and excellent, subtle knowledge and vision, directly see and directly realize; and they succor him according to his lineage, according to what he has entered, as is fitting.

Six · The Person Who Has Already Gained Entry (Distinctions)

What is named the person who has already gained entry? It is stated: there is a person who has already gained entry who has only entered, and is not about to be ripened, not already ripened, and has not gained deliverance; there is one who has both already entered and is about to be ripened, but is not already ripened, and has not gained deliverance; there is one who has both already entered and is already ripened, but has not gained deliverance, and courses according to his wish. Distinctions such as these, it should be known, are as their marks were already discerned before.

There are, further, others: as the distinctions belonging to the persons of soft faculties and the rest, stated in the Lineage Stage, so now herein, as is fitting, all the distinctions should likewise be known.

Thus stated: whether the intrinsic nature of entry, or the establishment of entry, or all the marks belonging to those who have entered, or the persons who have already entered — all of this, stated together, is named the Entry Stage.

聲聞地 · 初瑜伽處 · 出離地 · 二道+戒律儀The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · The First Yoga-Station · Deliverance · The Two Paths + Restraint by the Precepts

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

種姓地說種子之「有」、趣入地說其「動」,出離地說它怎樣「成」——依世間道、出世間道二道而趣離欲,並修二道的資糧十四門。本子起出離地總標、世間道、出世間道、二道資糧十四門之名,與第四門「戒律儀」的廣釋。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;嗢拕南壓縮處以〔〕補回所略。

出離地·總標

趣入地已經說完了。什麼是出離地?攝頌〔嗢拕南〕說:

〔頌〕若世間離欲、若如是的出世間〔離欲〕,以及這二者的資糧,這就名為出離地。

就是說:若由世間道而趣離欲、若由出世道而趣離欲、若這二道所有的資糧,總攝為一,名為出離地。

一、由世間道而趣離欲

什麼名為由世間道而趣離欲?就是譬如有一類人,對下地的欲界,觀為麁相;對初靜慮的「離生喜樂」——無論是定地、還是生地——觀為靜相。他由於多住在這樣的觀中,便於欲界而得離欲,也能證入最初靜慮。如此又於初靜慮之上,漸次如其所應,把一切下地觀為麁相、一切上地觀為靜相;他由多住這樣的觀,便乃至於無所有處而得離欲,也能證入乃至非想非非想處。如此名為由世間道而趣離欲。除此之外,再沒有更過、更增的了。

二、由出世道而趣離欲

什麼名為由出世道而趣離欲?就是譬如有一類人,親近善士,於聖法中已成聰慧、於聖法中已得調順:於苦聖諦如實知苦,於集聖諦如實知集,於滅聖諦如實知滅,於道聖諦如實知道。既成就了有學的智見,從此以後漸修聖道,遍於三界見所斷、修所斷的一切法中,自能離繫、自得解脫。如此便能超過三界。如此名為由出世道而趣離欲。

三、二道資糧(十四門)

什麼名為二道資糧?攝頌〔嗢拕南〕說:

〔頌〕自圓滿、他圓滿、善法欲、戒〔律儀〕、根律儀、食知量、覺寤〔瑜伽〕、正知〔而〕住、善友〔性〕、聞〔正法〕、思〔正法〕、無障〔礙〕、〔修惠〕捨、〔沙門〕莊嚴。

就是說:若自圓滿、若他圓滿、若善法欲、若戒律儀、若根律儀、若於食知量、若初夜後夜常勤修習覺寤瑜伽、若正知而住、若善友性、若聞正法、若思正法、若無障礙、若修惠捨、若沙門莊嚴。這樣等法,就名為世間及出世間諸離欲道的趣向資糧。

應知此中,若自圓滿、若他圓滿、若善法欲,這三者如同前面〔種姓地〕「修集種子諸劣緣」中,已經辨過它們的相了。〔故此處從第四門起。〕

四、第四門·戒律儀

什麼是戒律儀?攝頌〔嗢拕南〕說:

〔頌〕戒律儀,應知有「辨三」、「虧滿十」、「六異門」、「三淨」、與「勝功德十種」。

戒律儀者,就是譬如有一類人,安住於具足戒,廣說乃至受學學處。

(甲)辨三——戒律儀的六種行相

什麼名為安住具戒?就是於所受學的所有學處,不虧損身業、不虧損語業,無缺、無穿。如此名為安住具戒。

什麼名為善能守護別解脫律儀?就是能守護七眾所受的別解脫律儀。這律儀,因眾〔的差別〕而成多種律儀;今此義中,唯依苾芻〔比丘〕律儀而說「善能守護別解脫律儀」。

什麼名為軌則圓滿?就是譬如有一類人,或於威儀路、或於所作事、或於善品加行的處所,成就軌則:隨順世間,不越世間;隨順毘奈耶〔律〕,不越毘奈耶。

什麼名為「於威儀路成就軌則,隨順世間不越世間、隨順毘奈耶不越毘奈耶」?就是譬如有一類人,於所應行、於如所行,即於此中如是而行;由這樣行,不為世間所譏毀,不為賢良、正至、善士、諸同法者、諸持律者、諸學律者所呵責。如於所行,於其所住、所坐、所臥,當知也是如此。如此名為於威儀路成就軌則。

什麼名為「於所作事成就軌則」?就是譬如有一類人,於其所作——若衣服事、若便利事、若用水事、若楊枝事〔潔牙〕、若入聚落行乞食事、若受用事、若盪鉢事、若安置事、若洗足事、若為敷設臥具等事;此略說衣事、鉢事,還有其餘如此等類諸所應作,名所作事——如其所應,於所應作、於如所作,即於此中如是而作;由這樣作,不為世間譏毀,不為賢良乃至諸學律者呵責。如此名為於所作事成就軌則。

什麼名為「於諸善品加行處所成就軌則」?就是於種種善品加行:若於正法受持讀誦;若於尊長修和敬業、參覲承事;若於病者起慈悲心、殷重供侍;若於如法宣白〔僧事〕加行,住慈悲心,展轉與欲〔授與同意〕;若於正法請問聽受,翹勤無墮;於諸有智的同梵行者,盡其身力而修敬事;於他人善品常勤讚勵;常樂為他宣說正法;入於靜室,結跏趺坐,繫念思惟——如此等類,諸餘無量所修的善法,都名為善品加行。他於這樣所說的善品加行,如其所應而作,由是不為世間譏毀、不為諸學律者呵責。如此名為於諸善品加行處所成就軌則。若於這樣所說行相的軌則差別悉皆具足,應知名為軌則圓滿。

什麼名為所行圓滿?就是諸苾芻,略有五種非所行處〔不該去的地方〕,哪五種?一、唱令家〔屠宰唱賣處〕,二、婬女家,三、酤酒家,四、國王家,五、旃荼羅、羯恥那家〔賤族、獵戶〕。若於這樣如來所制的非所行處能善遠離,於其餘無罪的所有行處知時而行,如此名為所行圓滿。

什麼名為於微小罪見大怖畏?就是於諸小、隨小的學處,若有所犯而可令還淨的,名微小罪——於諸學處現行毀犯,說名為罪;既毀犯已,少用功力便得還淨,說名微小;由此因緣,名微小罪。怎樣於其中見大怖畏?就是作這樣的觀:莫教我因這毀犯的緣故,再不堪能得所未得、觸所未觸、證所未證;莫教我由此親近諸惡趣、往諸惡趣;或當自責,或為大師、諸天、有智同梵行者以法呵責;莫教我由此遍諸方所,惡名、惡稱、惡聲、惡頌遠近流布。他對這樣現法、當來毀犯所生的諸非愛果,見大怖畏;由此因緣,於小、隨小的所有學處,縱有命難因緣也不故犯;或時、或處因失念而犯,便速疾如法發露,令得還淨。如此名為於微小罪見大怖畏。

什麼名為受學學處?就是於先受別解脫戒、白四羯磨受具足戒時,從戒師處得聞少分學處的體性;又從親教師、軌範師處,得聞其餘的別解脫經,總略宣說過於二百五十學處,都自誓言「一切當學」;又從其餘恒言議者、同言議者、常交往者、有親愛者,聞所學處,又於半月常所宣說的別解脫經聞所學處,一切自誓「皆當修學」。因為對一切所應學處皆受學的緣故,說名獲得別解脫律儀。從此以後,於諸學處若已善巧,便能無犯;設有所犯,便如法悔;若諸學處未得善巧、未能曉悟,由先自誓願受持的緣故,便於今時求受善巧、欲求曉悟——於如前所說的諸所學處,從親教師或軌範師如先請問;既得善巧及曉悟已,隨所教誨無增無減,又能受學;又於尊重及等尊重者所說的學處,若文、若義都能無顛倒地領受。如此名為受學學處。如此就廣辨了戒律儀。

(乙)略義·三相

怎樣應知此中的略義?就是在這裡,世尊顯示「戒蘊」的略義,有三種相:一者、無失壞相,二者、自性相,三者、自性功德相。

這又是怎樣?就是若說「安住具戒」,由此顯示尸羅律儀的「無失壞相」。若說「能善守護別解脫律儀」,由此顯示尸羅律儀的「自性相」。若說「軌則、所行皆悉圓滿」,由此顯示別解脫律儀「如其所受、觀他增上」的自性功德相。

為什麼?由他人觀見這樣軌則、所行圓滿,未信者信、信者增長,由是發生清淨信處,心無厭惡、言不譏毀。若不是這樣具足尸羅、軌則所行皆圓滿的,「觀他增上」所有的功德勝利就應沒有,與此相違的過失就應有。若又說「於微小罪見大怖畏、受學學處」,由此顯示別解脫律儀「如其所受、觀自增上」的自性功德相。

為什麼?雖由這樣軌則、所行皆圓滿,獲得如前「觀他增上」的功德勝利,然而由毀犯淨戒的緣故,當生惡趣,或無堪能得所未得,如前廣說;若能於那微小罪中見大怖畏,於先所受的上品學處能正修學,由此因緣,身壞已後當生善趣,也有堪能得所未得,如前廣說。由此因緣,說這名為別解脫律儀「如其所受、觀自增上」的功德勝利。

(丙)六異門·三戒性

又有異門:就是佛世尊此中略顯三種戒性——一、受持戒性,二、出離戒性,三、修習戒性。

若說「安住具戒」,由此顯示受持戒性。若說「能善守護別解脫律儀」,由此顯示出離戒性。為什麼?別解脫律儀所攝的淨戒,當知名為「增上戒學」;即依這樣的增上戒學,修「增上心學」、「增上慧學」,由此能得一切苦盡、究竟出離;這樣的出離,以增上戒為前行所依止處,所以說這別解脫律儀名為出離戒性。若說「軌則、所行皆悉圓滿,於微小罪見大怖畏,受學學處」,由此顯示修習戒性。為什麼?若由這樣所說諸相的別解脫律儀修習淨戒,名「善修習、極善修習」。

如此一種尸羅律儀現前宣說,當知〔開為〕六種〔即上辨三、略義、異門所顯〕。

(丁)十種虧損因緣

又即這樣的尸羅律儀,由十因緣當知虧損;即與此相違的十因緣,當知圓滿。

哪十種虧損因緣?一、最初惡受尸羅律儀,二、太極沈下,三、太極浮散,四、放逸懈怠所攝,五、發起邪願,六、軌則虧損所攝,七、淨命虧損所攝,八、墮在二邊,九、不能出離,十、所受失壞。

什麼名為最初惡受尸羅律儀?就是譬如有一類人,被國王逼迫而求出家,或為狂賊、或為債主、或為怖畏、或為不活畏所逼迫而求出家;不為沙門性、不為婆羅門性、不為自調伏、不為自寂靜、不為自涅槃而求出家。如此名為最初惡受尸羅律儀。

什麼名為太極沈下?就是譬如有一類人,天性無羞恥,惡作〔悔過之心〕羸劣,為性慢緩,於諸學處所作慢緩。如此名為太極沈下。

什麼名為太極浮散?就是譬如有一類人,堅執惡取,於非處〔不該悔的事〕生惡作,於不應作的諸惡作中浪作惡作;於非處對他人起輕蔑心、或惱害心,於其非處強生曉悟〔強人從己〕。如此名為太極浮散。

什麼名為放逸懈怠所攝?就是譬如有一類人,於過去世所毀犯的,由失念故,一類不能如法還淨;如由過去,由未來、現在世也是如此——所毀犯的,由失念故不能如法還淨。又不是先時就對所毀犯發起猛利的「無犯樂欲」(即立志「我定當如如所行、如是而行、終不毀犯」);由是因緣,隨所行住而屢屢毀犯,由此成就前際、後際、中際俱行、先時所作及俱隨行的種種放逸。又自執取睡眠為樂、偃臥為樂、脇臥為樂;天性不翹勤、為性懶惰、不具起發;於諸有智同梵行者,不能時時覲問供事。這名為放逸懈怠所攝。

什麼名為發起邪願?就是譬如有一類人,依止邪願而修梵行,說「我所有的若戒、若禁,若常精勤、若修梵行,當得生天,或餘天處」;或又愛樂利養恭敬而修梵行——因此從他人希求利養恭敬,即於這樣的利養恭敬深生染著。如此名為發起邪願。

什麼名為軌則虧損所攝?就是譬如有一類人,於威儀路、或所作事、或諸善品加行處所的所有軌則,不順世間、違越世間,不順毘奈耶、違越毘奈耶,如前廣說。這名為軌則虧損所攝。

什麼名為淨命虧損所攝?就是譬如有一類人,天性大欲、不知喜足、難養難滿:常以非法追求衣服、飲食、臥具、病緣醫藥及諸資具,不以正法。又為貪求種種衣食臥具醫藥資具的緣故,方便顯示自己有勝功德,矯詐構集非常的威儀——為誑騙他人,恒常詐現諸根無掉、諸根無動、諸根寂靜,由是令他人以為他有德、當有所施、當有所作(所謂承事、供給衣食臥具醫藥資具)。又多凶悖、強口、矯傲,修飾己名、執恃種姓;或求多聞、或住持法,為利養故也為他宣說正法(或佛所說、或弟子所說、或自宣說自己實有德、或稍加增益);或於他人面前方便現相,為求衣服、或求隨一沙門資具;或為求多、或求精妙,雖無匱乏卻故意穿著破舊衣裳,為令淨信的長者、居士、婆羅門等,知他衣服有所匱乏而殷重承事、給施眾多上妙衣服(如為衣服,為餘隨一沙門資生眾具也是如此)。或於淨信的長者居士婆羅門所,如其所欲不得稱遂,或彼財物有所闕乏、求不得時,便強逼、研磨〔糾纏〕、麁語而苦求索;或彼財物無所闕乏而所得下劣時,便當著施主面毀棄所得財物,這樣告言:「咄哉男子!某善男子、某善女人,比起你的族姓財寶極為下劣、又極貧匱,尚能惠施這麼多妙好悅意的資產眾具;你論族姓尊貴、財寶豐饒,為何只施這麼少劣、不悅意之物?」他這樣或依矯詐、或邪妄語、或假現相、或苦研逼、或利求利〔以小利釣大利〕種種狀相,而從他人非法希求所有衣食臥具醫藥諸資生具,不以正法而求——由非法故,說名邪命。如此名為尸羅淨命虧損所攝。

什麼名為墮在二邊?就是譬如有一類人,耽著受用「極樂行邊」:從他人所得的、或如法或非法的衣食臥具醫藥及諸資具,愛玩受用,不觀過患、不知出離——這是一邊。又有一類人,好求受用「自苦行邊」:以無量門而自煎迫、受極苦楚——或依棘刺、或依灰坌、或依木杵、或依木板、或狐蹲住、或狐蹲坐而修斷瑜伽;或復事火(謂乃至三度承事於火);或復昇水(謂乃至三度昇上其水);或一足而住、隨日而轉;或其餘如此等類修自苦行——這是第二邊。如此名為墮在二邊。

什麼名為不能出離?就是譬如有一類人,或戒、或禁,由「見」而執取,說「我因此若戒、若禁,當得清淨、解脫、出離」。一切外道所有的禁戒,雖善防護、雖善清淨,如其清淨,卻不名出離。如此名為不能出離。

什麼名為所受失壞?就是譬如有一類人,都無羞恥、不顧沙門〔之分〕,毀犯淨戒、習諸惡法,內懷腐敗、外現貞實,猶如淨水所生的蝸牛、發螺音而行狗行——實非沙門,自稱沙門;實非梵行,自稱梵行。如此名為所受失壞。

略由如此十種因緣,名「戒虧損」。世尊或說「尸羅虧損」,或時又說「尸羅艱難」;當知於那諸因緣中,由二因緣——即「不能出離」與「所受失壞」——〔世尊說為尸羅艱難〕;由其餘的因緣,當知唯說「尸羅虧損」。

與這安立黑品的因緣相違的白品所有因緣,當知名為「尸羅圓滿、尸羅清淨」。

(戊)六伽他·尸羅異名

有處,世尊宣說尸羅名為「根本」。如伽他說: 〔頌〕若善住根本,其心便寂靜;〔由此〕因聖見、惡見,相應、不相應〔而別〕。

有處,世尊宣說尸羅名為「莊嚴具」。如伽他說: 〔頌〕苾芻、苾芻尼,戒莊嚴圓滿;於不善能捨,於善能修習。

有處,世尊宣說尸羅名為「塗香」。如伽他說: 〔頌〕苾芻、苾芻尼,戒塗香圓滿;於不善能捨,於善能修習。

有處,世尊宣說尸羅名為「薰香」。如伽他說: 〔頌〕阿難!有香類,順風善能薰,逆風亦能薰,順逆薰亦爾。

有處,世尊宣說尸羅名為「妙行」。如伽他說: 〔頌〕身妙行能感可愛諸異熟,於現法、當來,語妙行亦爾。

有處,世尊宣說尸羅名為「律儀」。如伽他說: 〔頌〕諸有惠施主,具戒、住律儀,有阿笈摩〔聖教〕見,及有〔業〕果正見。

又有說言:安住具戒,善能守護別解脫律儀,乃至廣說。

問:什麼緣故世尊宣說尸羅名為「根本」?答:能建立的義、能任持的義,就是根本義。由這尸羅建立、任持一切世間及出世間,能引無罪、最勝第一的快樂功德,令生、令證,所以尸羅說名根本。譬如大地,建立、任持一切藥草、卉木、叢林,令生、令長;尸羅也是如此,如前廣說。

問:什麼緣故世尊宣說尸羅名為「莊嚴具」?答:其餘世間的耳環、指環、腕釧、臂釧、寶印、金銀、華鬘等妙莊嚴具,若由幼稚、黑髮、少年、盛壯、姝妙形色者而服飾之,稍增妙好;若由朽老、衰邁、齒落、髮白、年逾八十或九十者而服飾之,便無妙好(唯除俳戲令眾歡笑);若遭病苦、財貨匱乏、親戚喪亡時服之,也無妙好。而戒莊嚴具,於一切類、一切時,凡有服者皆為妙好。所以尸羅名莊嚴具。

問:什麼緣故世尊宣說尸羅名為「塗香」?答:由這所受清淨無罪的妙善尸羅,能正除遣「一切所受惡戒為因」的身心熱惱。譬如最極炎熾的熱時,塗以栴檀、龍腦香等,一切欝蒸皆得除滅。所以尸羅說名塗香。

問:什麼緣故世尊宣說尸羅名為「薰香」?答:具戒的士夫補特伽羅,遍諸方域,妙善的稱譽聲頌普聞。譬如種種根香、莖香等,隨風飄颺遍諸方所,悅意芬馥、周流彌遠。所以尸羅名為薰香。

問:什麼緣故世尊宣說尸羅名為「妙行」?答:由這尸羅清淨善行,能趣妙樂、往妙天趣、向妙安隱,故名妙行。

問:什麼緣故世尊宣說尸羅名為「律儀」?答:由這尸羅清淨善法,是防護性、是息除相、是遠離體,故名律儀。

(己)三觀清淨因——觀身語意業

又戒律儀有三種「觀清淨因相」,哪三種?一、觀身業,二、觀語業,三、觀意業。

怎樣觀察這些業,令戒律儀皆得清淨?就是將要造、或正要造身業時,這樣觀察:「我此身業,是能自損、及以損他,是不善性、能生眾苦、招苦異熟?還是不自損、亦不損他,是其善性、能生諸樂、招樂異熟?」這樣觀已:若自知我此身業自損損他、是不善性能生眾苦招苦異熟,即於此業攝斂不作、也不給它方便;若自知我此身業不損自他、是其善性〔餘如前說〕,即於此業不攝斂、而造作、給它方便。又對過去已造的身業也數數觀察:「我此身業為能自損〔餘如前說〕」;這樣觀已,若自知自損損他,便於有智同梵行者前如實發露、如法悔除;若自知不損自他,便生歡喜,晝夜安住、多隨修學。如此他於去、來、今世所造的身業,能善觀察、能善清淨。

如於身業,於其語業,當知也是如此。

〔意業:〕由過去行為緣而生意、由未來行為緣而生意、由現在行為緣而生意,即於此意數數觀察:「我此意業為能自損〔餘如前說〕」;這樣觀已,若自知我此意業是其黑品,即於此業攝斂不起、不給方便;若自知是其白品,即於此業不斂攝、而發起、給方便。如此他於去來今世所起的意業,能善觀察、能善清淨。為什麼?去來今世所有的沙門、婆羅門,於身語意三種業中,或已觀察、或當觀察、或正觀察,或已清淨、或當清淨、或正清淨,或已多住、或當多住、或正多住——一切都由這樣觀察、這樣清淨。

如佛世尊曾為長老羅怙羅〔羅睺羅〕說: 〔頌〕你如今羅怙羅!於身、語、意業,應數數正觀察,憶念諸佛聖教。羅怙羅!你應學這沙門之業;若能於此學,唯有勝善、無有惡。

若於這樣身語意業審正思擇「我此諸業為能自損」〔廣說如前〕,這名為觀察;若於一分攝斂不作、亦不給便〔廣說乃至發露悔除〕,又於一分不斂攝、而造作給便〔廣說乃至便生歡喜、晝夜安住、多隨修學〕,這名為清淨。

(庚)十種功德勝利

如此清淨的尸羅律儀,應知有十種功德勝利,哪十種?

就是諸所有具戒的士夫補特伽羅,自觀戒淨便得「無悔」;無悔故「歡」;歡故生「喜」;由心喜故,身得「輕安」;身輕安故便受「勝樂」;樂故心「定」;心得定故,能「如實知、如實見」;實知見故便能「起厭」;能起厭故便得「離染」;由離染故證得「解脫」;得解脫故便自知見「我已解脫」,乃至「我能於無餘依般涅槃界當般涅槃」。如此具戒的補特伽羅,由尸羅清淨的增上力,獲得無悔、漸次乃至能到涅槃。這名為第一尸羅律儀功德勝利。

又有具戒補特伽羅,於臨終時起這樣的念:「我已善作身語意行,非我惡作身語意行」〔乃至廣說〕;若有那作福業者、作善業者、能救濟諸怖畏者所應往的趣,我於那趣必定當往——如此獲得「能往善趣」的第二無悔。由這無悔恨的補特伽羅,名「賢善死、賢善夭逝、賢善過往」。這名為第二功德勝利。

又有具戒補特伽羅,遍諸方域,妙善的稱譽聲頌普聞。這名為第三功德勝利。

又有具戒補特伽羅,寢安、覺安,遠離一切身心熱惱。這名為第四功德勝利。

又有具戒補特伽羅,若寢、若覺,諸天保護。這名為第五功德勝利。

又有具戒補特伽羅,於他人凶暴不憂慮其惡,無諸怖畏、心離驚恐。這名為第六功德勝利。

又有具戒補特伽羅,那些喜殺者、怨讎惡友,雖得其隙也常加保護——了知此是具戒士夫補特伽羅,或為善友、或住中平〔不加害〕。這名為第七功德勝利。

又有具戒補特伽羅,一切魍魎、藥叉、宅神、非人之類,雖得其便、雖得其隙,卻常加保護——謂由具尸羅的增上力。這名為第八功德勝利。

又有具戒補特伽羅,於法無艱難,從他人獲得種種利養——所謂衣服、飲食、臥具、病緣醫藥及諸資具;由依尸羅的增上因力,國王、大臣及諸黎庶、饒財長者及商主等恭敬尊重。這名為第九功德勝利。

又有具戒補特伽羅,一切所願皆得稱遂:若於欲界,願樂當生剎帝利大族姓家、或婆羅門大族姓家、或諸居士大族姓家、或諸長者大族姓家,或四大王眾天、或三十三天、或夜摩天、或覩史多天、或化樂天、或他化自在天眾同分中——由戒淨故,即隨所願當得往生;若願樂入諸靜慮的現法樂住,或於有色天眾同分中若住、若生——由戒淨故便得離欲,所願皆遂;若願樂寂靜勝解、超過色定、入無色定具足安住,或於無色天眾同分中當得往生〔餘如前說〕;若願樂當證最極究竟涅槃——由戒淨故便證一切究竟離欲。這名為第十功德勝利。

如此就說了戒蘊的廣辨、虧損、圓滿、異門、觀察及清淨、以及所有功德勝利。於此宣說、明了開示一切種相,最極圓滿、資糧所攝的尸羅律儀。若有自愛樂沙門性、婆羅門性的諸善男子,應勤修學。

The Stage of the Lineage spoke of the seed's "being," the Stage of Entry spoke of its "stirring"; the Stage of Deliverance speaks of how it "comes to be" — how, by the two paths, the mundane path and the supramundane path, one proceeds toward the freedom from desire, and how one cultivates the fourteen gateways of provisions for the two paths. This unit gives the overall heading of the Stage of Deliverance, the mundane path, the supramundane path, the names of the fourteen gateways of provisions for the two paths, and the extended exposition of the fourth gateway, "restraint by the precepts." Technical terms are kept as of old; each sentence is rendered into today's language, adding no doctrine, citing no treatise, glossing no Sanskrit; where the uddāna compresses, what it abbreviates is supplied back within 〔brackets〕.

The Stage of Deliverance · Overall Heading

The Stage of Entry has already been finished. What is the Stage of Deliverance? The summary verse 〔uddāna〕 says:

〔Verse〕 The freedom from desire that is mundane; the freedom from desire that is thus supramundane; and the provisions for these two — this is named the Stage of Deliverance.

That is to say: whether the proceeding toward freedom from desire by the mundane path, or the proceeding toward freedom from desire by the supramundane path, or all the provisions belonging to these two paths — gathered together as one, these are named the Stage of Deliverance.

One · Proceeding toward Freedom from Desire by the Mundane Path

What is named the proceeding toward freedom from desire by the mundane path? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who regards the lower ground, the desire-realm, as coarse in aspect, and who regards the first meditative absorption's "joy and bliss born of seclusion" — whether as the ground of concentration or as the ground of rebirth — as calm in aspect. Because he dwells much in contemplation of this kind, he thereupon attains freedom from desire with respect to the desire-realm, and is able to enter the first meditative absorption. In the same way, again, above the first meditative absorption, gradually and each as is fitting, he regards every lower ground as coarse in aspect and every higher ground as calm in aspect; because he dwells much in contemplation of this kind, he thereupon, on up to the base of nothing-whatever, attains freedom from desire, and is able to enter, on up to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception. In this way is it named the proceeding toward freedom from desire by the mundane path. Beyond this, there is nothing further, nothing more added.

Two · Proceeding toward Freedom from Desire by the Supramundane Path

What is named the proceeding toward freedom from desire by the supramundane path? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who draws near to good persons, who has become sagacious within the noble Dharma and has become well-tamed within the noble Dharma: with respect to the noble truth of suffering he knows suffering as it really is; with respect to the noble truth of origination he knows origination as it really is; with respect to the noble truth of cessation he knows cessation as it really is; with respect to the noble truth of the path he knows the path as it really is. Having accomplished the knowledge-and-vision of one still in training, from this point on he gradually cultivates the noble path, and throughout all the phenomena to be abandoned by seeing and to be abandoned by cultivation across the three realms, he is himself able to be freed from bondage and himself attains liberation. In this way he is able to pass beyond the three realms. In this way is it named the proceeding toward freedom from desire by the supramundane path.

Three · The Provisions for the Two Paths (Fourteen Gateways)

What is named the provisions for the two paths? The summary verse 〔uddāna〕 says:

〔Verse〕 Self-completeness; other-completeness; the aspiration for the wholesome Dharma; the precepts 〔the restraint of the precepts〕; restraint of the sense-faculties; knowing the measure in food; wakefulness 〔yoga〕; dwelling with clear comprehension; good-friendship 〔its nature〕; hearing 〔the true Dharma〕; reflecting 〔on the true Dharma〕; being without obstruction; 〔cultivating〕 munificent giving; and the 〔śramaṇa's〕 adornment.

That is to say: whether self-completeness, or other-completeness, or the aspiration for the wholesome Dharma, or restraint by the precepts, or restraint of the sense-faculties, or knowing the measure in food, or, in the first and last watches of the night, constantly and diligently cultivating the yoga of wakefulness, or dwelling with clear comprehension, or the nature of good-friendship, or hearing the true Dharma, or reflecting on the true Dharma, or being without obstruction, or cultivating munificent giving, or the śramaṇa's adornment. Dharmas of this kind are named the provisions for proceeding along the mundane and supramundane paths of freedom from desire.

It should be known that here, as for self-completeness, other-completeness, and the aspiration for the wholesome Dharma — these three, just as before in the Stage of the Lineage under "the inferior conditions for gathering and amassing the seeds," have already had their characteristics distinguished. 〔Hence here it begins from the fourth gateway.〕

Four · The Fourth Gateway · Restraint by the Precepts

What is restraint by the precepts? The summary verse 〔uddāna〕 says:

〔Verse〕 As for restraint by the precepts, it should be known to have the "distinguishing of three," the "ten of loss and completion," the "six alternative gateways," the "three purities," and the "ten kinds of excellent merit."

Restraint by the precepts is like this: there is a certain kind of person who dwells in the fullness of the precepts, and — to speak at length — on up to receiving and training in the training-precepts.

(a) The Distinguishing of Three — the Six Modes of Restraint by the Precepts

What is named dwelling in the full precepts? It is that, with respect to all the training-precepts he has received to train in, he does not damage his bodily action and does not damage his verbal action, being without lack and without breach. In this way is it named dwelling in the full precepts.

What is named being well able to guard the restraint of the individual liberation? It is that he is able to guard the restraint of the individual liberation received by the seven assemblies. This restraint, because of the 〔differences among the〕 assemblies, becomes many kinds of restraint; but in the present meaning, it is only in dependence on the restraint of the bhikṣu 〔monk〕 that "being well able to guard the restraint of the individual liberation" is spoken of.

What is named fullness of comportment? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, whether upon the paths of deportment, or in the tasks to be done, or in the places for the preparatory practice of the wholesome classes, accomplishes his comportment: conforming to the world, not transgressing the world; conforming to the Vinaya 〔the discipline〕, not transgressing the Vinaya.

What is named "upon the paths of deportment he accomplishes his comportment, conforming to the world and not transgressing the world, conforming to the Vinaya and not transgressing the Vinaya"? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, with respect to what should be done and to how it is done, acts within just this in such a way; and by acting in this way, he is not mocked or reviled by the world, and is not censured by the worthy and good, the truly arrived, good persons, all fellow followers of the Dharma, all upholders of the discipline, and all trainees in the discipline. As with what is walked, so with what is stood in, sat in, and lain in — it should be known to be likewise. In this way is it named "upon the paths of deportment he accomplishes his comportment."

What is named "in the tasks to be done he accomplishes his comportment"? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, with respect to his tasks — whether the matter of robes, or the matter of relieving oneself, or the matter of using water, or the matter of the tooth-stick 〔cleaning the teeth〕, or the matter of entering a village on the alms-round for food, or the matter of enjoying use, or the matter of rinsing the bowl, or the matter of setting things in place, or the matter of washing the feet, or such matters as spreading out bedding and the like; this, stated briefly, is the matter of robes and the matter of the bowl, and there remain still other such classes of things that should be done, named the tasks to be done — each as is fitting, with respect to what should be done and to how it is done, acts within just this in such a way; and by acting in this way, he is not mocked or reviled by the world, and is not censured by the worthy and good on down to all trainees in the discipline. In this way is it named "in the tasks to be done he accomplishes his comportment."

What is named "in the places for the preparatory practice of the wholesome classes he accomplishes his comportment"? It is with respect to the manifold preparatory practices of the wholesome classes: whether receiving, upholding, reading, and reciting the true Dharma; or, toward elders, cultivating the deeds of concord and reverence, calling upon and attending them; or, toward the sick, giving rise to a mind of loving-kindness and compassion, earnestly and gravely nursing and attending them; or, in the preparatory practice of proclaiming and announcing 〔the affairs of the Saṃgha〕 in accord with the Dharma, dwelling in a mind of loving-kindness and compassion, in turn granting consent 〔conveying one's assent〕; or, requesting, questioning, listening to, and receiving the true Dharma, rousing oneself diligently without falling away; toward all wise fellow practitioners of the pure life, cultivating reverence and service to the full of one's bodily strength; toward the wholesome classes of others, constantly and diligently praising and encouraging; constantly delighting to proclaim the true Dharma for others; entering a quiet room, sitting cross-legged, fixing mindfulness and reflecting — such classes as these, and all the remaining measureless wholesome dharmas that are cultivated, are all named the preparatory practice of the wholesome classes. He, with respect to the preparatory practice of the wholesome classes thus stated, acts as is fitting, and thereby is not mocked or reviled by the world, is not censured by all the trainees in the discipline. In this way is it named "in the places for the preparatory practice of the wholesome classes he accomplishes his comportment." If, with respect to the distinctions of comportment of the modes thus stated, he is possessed of them all in full, it should be known to be named fullness of comportment.

What is named fullness of the domain of conduct? It is that, for the bhikṣus, there are in brief five kinds of place-that-is-not-a-domain-of-conduct 〔places one should not go〕. Which five? First, the house of the crier 〔where slaughtered goods are hawked〕; second, the house of the harlot; third, the house of the liquor-seller; fourth, the house of the king; fifth, the house of the caṇḍāla and the kaṭhina 〔the outcastes and the hunters〕. If, with respect to the places-that-are-not-a-domain-of-conduct thus prescribed by the Tathāgata, he is well able to keep far away, and, in the remaining blameless places of conduct, he acts knowing the time — in this way is it named fullness of the domain of conduct.

What is named seeing great dread in the slightest fault? It is that, with respect to all the slight and following-slight training-precepts, if there is anything transgressed that can be made pure again, this is named a slight fault — with respect to the training-precepts, the present committing of a transgression is called a fault; once transgressed, with but little application of effort it can be made pure again, and this is called slight; for this reason it is named a slight fault. How does one, within this, see great dread? It is that he makes this contemplation: "May I not, on account of this transgression, be no longer able to attain what has not been attained, to touch what has not been touched, to realize what has not been realized; may I not, on account of this, draw near the evil destinies and go to the evil destinies; may I not blame myself, or be reproved in accord with the Dharma by the Great Teacher, the gods, and the wise fellow practitioners of the pure life; may I not, on account of this, have evil repute, evil report, evil sound, and evil verses spread abroad near and far throughout every quarter." He, with respect to the various unwished-for fruits arising from transgression in this present life and in the life to come, sees great dread; and for this reason, with respect to all the slight and following-slight training-precepts, even were there a cause endangering life, he does not deliberately transgress; and if, at some time or in some place, through loss of mindfulness he does transgress, he then swiftly, in accord with the Dharma, reveals it and lets it be made pure again. In this way is it named seeing great dread in the slightest fault.

What is named receiving and training in the training-precepts? It is that, at the time of formerly receiving the individual-liberation precepts and receiving the full precepts by the formal act of one motion and three announcements, from the precept-master he came to hear a small portion of the essential nature of the training-precepts; and again, from his preceptor and his instructor, he came to hear the remaining individual-liberation sūtra, which sets forth in brief summary more than two hundred and fifty training-precepts, and he vowed of himself, "I shall train in them all"; and again, from the remaining constant discussants, fellow discussants, constant associates, and dear ones, he heard the training-precepts, and again, from the individual-liberation sūtra constantly proclaimed each fortnight, he heard the training-precepts, and he vowed of himself with respect to all of them, "I shall train in them all." Because he receives to train in all the training-precepts that should be trained in, it is said that he obtains the restraint of the individual liberation. From this point on, with respect to the training-precepts, if he is already skilled, he is then able to be without transgression; should there be anything transgressed, he then repents of it in accord with the Dharma; if, with respect to the training-precepts, he has not yet gained skill, has not yet been able to understand, then because he formerly vowed of himself to receive and uphold them, he now, at this time, seeks to receive skill and wishes to seek understanding — with respect to the training-precepts as stated above, from his preceptor or his instructor he asks as formerly; and having gained skill and understanding, in accord with the instruction, without adding and without subtracting, he is again able to receive and train; and again, with respect to the training-precepts stated by those he reveres and those equally to be revered, whether the letter or the meaning, he is able to receive them without inversion. In this way is it named receiving and training in the training-precepts. In this way, then, restraint by the precepts has been extensively distinguished.

(b) The Brief Meaning · Three Characteristics

How should the brief meaning here be known? It is that here the World-Honored One displays the brief meaning of the "aggregate of the precepts," which has three characteristics: first, the characteristic of being without loss-and-ruin; second, the characteristic of intrinsic nature; third, the characteristic of the merit of the intrinsic nature.

How is this again? It is that if it is said "dwelling in the full precepts," by this is displayed the "characteristic of being without loss-and-ruin" of the restraint of the precepts, of śīla. If it is said "being well able to guard the restraint of the individual liberation," by this is displayed the "characteristic of intrinsic nature" of the restraint of the precepts, of śīla. If it is said "comportment and domain of conduct are all in full," by this is displayed the characteristic of the merit of the intrinsic nature of the restraint of the individual liberation, "as it is received, in regard to the augmentation upon others."

Why so? Because when others behold comportment and domain of conduct thus in full, the unbelieving come to believe and the believing are increased, and from this there arises a site of pure faith, with the mind free of aversion and speech free of mockery. Were it not thus — the precepts complete, comportment and domain of conduct all in full — the merit and excellence of "the augmentation upon others" would have to be absent, and the fault contrary to this would have to be present. And if it is again said "seeing great dread in the slightest fault, and receiving and training in the training-precepts," by this is displayed the characteristic of the merit of the intrinsic nature of the restraint of the individual liberation, "as it is received, in regard to the augmentation upon oneself."

Why so? Although by comportment and domain of conduct being thus in full one obtains, as before, the merit and excellence of "the augmentation upon others," yet because of transgressing the pure precepts one will be reborn in the evil destinies, or be without the capacity to attain what has not been attained, as extensively said before; whereas if one is able, within those slight faults, to see great dread, and is able rightly to train in the superior training-precepts formerly received, then for this reason, after the body's breaking-up, one will be reborn in the good destinies, and will also have the capacity to attain what has not been attained, as extensively said before. For this reason, this is said to be named the merit and excellence of the restraint of the individual liberation, "as it is received, in regard to the augmentation upon oneself."

(c) The Six Alternative Gateways · The Three Natures of the Precepts

Again there is an alternative gateway: it is that the Buddha, the World-Honored One, here displays in brief three natures of the precepts — first, the receiving-and-upholding nature of the precepts; second, the deliverance nature of the precepts; third, the cultivating nature of the precepts.

If it is said "dwelling in the full precepts," by this is displayed the receiving-and-upholding nature of the precepts. If it is said "being well able to guard the restraint of the individual liberation," by this is displayed the deliverance nature of the precepts. Why so? The pure precepts subsumed under the restraint of the individual liberation should be known to be named the "higher discipline training"; and it is in dependence on this higher discipline training that one cultivates the "higher mind training" and the "higher wisdom training," and thereby is able to attain the exhaustion of all suffering, the ultimate deliverance; such deliverance takes the higher discipline as the site of support for what goes before, and therefore this restraint of the individual liberation is said to be named the deliverance nature of the precepts. If it is said "comportment and domain of conduct are all in full, seeing great dread in the slightest fault, receiving and training in the training-precepts," by this is displayed the cultivating nature of the precepts. Why so? If, by the restraint of the individual liberation of the modes thus stated, one cultivates the pure precepts, it is named "well cultivated, most excellently cultivated."

Thus one restraint by the precepts of śīla, set forth as present, should be known to be 〔opened out into〕 six kinds 〔namely those displayed by the distinguishing-of-three, the brief meaning, and the alternative gateway above〕.

(d) The Ten Causal Conditions of Loss

Again, this very restraint by the precepts of śīla should be known to be lost by ten causal conditions; and by the ten causal conditions contrary to these, it should be known to be complete.

Which ten causal conditions of loss? First, the initial evil receiving of the restraint by the precepts of śīla; second, being too extremely sunk-down; third, being too extremely floating-scattered; fourth, being subsumed under negligence and indolence; fifth, giving rise to wrong vows; sixth, being subsumed under loss of comportment; seventh, being subsumed under loss of pure livelihood; eighth, falling into the two extremes; ninth, being unable to bring deliverance; tenth, ruin of what was received.

What is named the initial evil receiving of the restraint by the precepts of śīla? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, pressed by a king, seeks to go forth into homelessness, or who, on account of a raging bandit, or of a creditor, or of dread, or of the fear of not staying alive, being pressed by these, seeks to go forth; who seeks to go forth not for the sake of the śramaṇa-nature, not for the sake of the brāhmaṇa-nature, not for the sake of self-taming, not for the sake of self-stilling, not for the sake of self-nirvāṇa. In this way is it named the initial evil receiving of the restraint by the precepts of śīla.

What is named being too extremely sunk-down? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who is by nature without shame, whose remorse 〔the mind of contrition for a fault〕 is feeble, whose disposition is slack, and who acts slackly with respect to the training-precepts. In this way is it named being too extremely sunk-down.

What is named being too extremely floating-scattered? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who firmly grasps at an evil grasping, who gives rise to remorse over what is not an occasion for it 〔a matter not to be repented〕, who recklessly makes remorse over deeds that ought not to be made objects of remorse; who, over what is not the occasion for it, gives rise to a mind of contempt or a mind of vexing-harm toward others, and who, over what is not the occasion for it, forcibly gives rise to "understanding" 〔forcing others to follow himself〕. In this way is it named being too extremely floating-scattered.

What is named being subsumed under negligence and indolence? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, with respect to what was transgressed in a past lifetime, through loss of mindfulness is in one class unable to make it pure again in accord with the Dharma; and as with the past, so too with the future and the present — what is transgressed, through loss of mindfulness, he is unable to make pure again in accord with the Dharma. And he did not, at an earlier time, give rise, toward what is transgressed, to a keen "wish-and-delight for non-transgression" (that is, resolving, "I shall assuredly, just as it should be walked, act in such a way, and shall never transgress"); and for this reason, following whatever he walks and dwells in, he transgresses again and again, and thereby accomplishes the manifold negligences that are together-operating in the earlier phase, the later phase, and the middle phase, and are done at an earlier time and are together-following. And again he grasps at sleep as bliss, at reclining as bliss, at lying on his side as bliss; he is by nature not rousing himself, is by disposition lazy, does not fully rouse himself up; toward the wise fellow practitioners of the pure life he is unable, from time to time, to call upon and attend and serve them. This is named being subsumed under negligence and indolence.

What is named giving rise to wrong vows? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, in dependence on a wrong vow, cultivates the pure life, saying, "By whatever precepts or restraints I have, or by constant diligent striving, or by cultivating the pure life, I shall attain rebirth in heaven, or in some other heavenly place"; or who again, out of delight in gain and reverence, cultivates the pure life — and therefore, from others he longs for gain and reverence, and thus toward such gain and reverence he gives rise to deep attachment. In this way is it named giving rise to wrong vows.

What is named being subsumed under loss of comportment? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, with respect to all the comportment that belongs to the paths of deportment, or the tasks to be done, or the places for the preparatory practice of the wholesome classes, does not conform to the world but transgresses the world, does not conform to the Vinaya but transgresses the Vinaya, as extensively said before. This is named being subsumed under loss of comportment.

What is named being subsumed under loss of pure livelihood? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who is by nature of great desire, not knowing contentment, hard to nurture and hard to fill: he constantly pursues robes, food and drink, bedding, medicine for illness, and all requisites by non-Dharmic means, not by the right Dharma. And again, for the sake of coveting the manifold robes, food, bedding, medicine, and requisites, by contrivance he displays his own excellent merits, and by fraud and deceit fashions an uncommon comportment — in order to delude others, he constantly and deceitfully makes a show that his faculties are without agitation, his faculties without stirring, his faculties stilled, and thereby causes others to suppose that he has virtue, that something ought to be given, something ought to be done (namely, attending upon and supplying robes, food, bedding, medicine, and requisites). And he is much given to violence, harsh of speech, and arrogant, embellishing his own name and relying upon his family lineage; or he seeks much learning, or upholds the Dharma, and for the sake of gain he also proclaims the true Dharma for others (whether what the Buddha spoke, or what the disciples spoke, or himself proclaiming that he himself truly has virtue, or slightly adding to it); or before others, by contrivance he displays a show, in order to seek robes, or to seek some one of the śramaṇa's requisites; or in order to seek much, or to seek the fine and marvelous, though without lack he deliberately wears worn and old garments, in order to cause the elders, householders, brāhmaṇas, and the like of pure faith, knowing that his robes are lacking, earnestly to attend upon him and give him many superb and marvelous robes (as with robes, so too for the seeking of some one of the requisites that sustain a śramaṇa's life). Or, at the place of an elder, householder, or brāhmaṇa of pure faith, when what he wishes is not obtained as he would have it, or when their goods are somewhat lacking and, seeking, he does not obtain — he then forcibly presses, grinds upon them 〔pesters〕, and with coarse words bitterly demands; or, when their goods are not lacking, yet what he obtains is inferior, he then, before the donor's face, casts away and discards what he obtained, saying thus: "Alas, sir! Such a good man, such a good woman, compared with your lineage and wealth, are far more inferior and far poorer, and yet were able to give this much that is marvelous, good, and delightful; you, who by lineage are noble and by wealth abundant, why do you give only this little, inferior, undelightful thing?" He thus, whether relying on fraud and deceit, or on wrong and false speech, or by falsely displaying a show, or by bitter grinding-pressure, or by "using gain to angle for gain" 〔using a small gain to fish for a large one〕, by manifold appearances, from others by non-Dharmic means longs for all the robes, food, bedding, medicine, and life-sustaining requisites — not seeking by the right Dharma. Because it is non-Dharmic, it is named wrong livelihood. In this way is it named being subsumed under loss of the pure livelihood of śīla.

What is named falling into the two extremes? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who is addicted to the enjoyment of the "extreme of the practice of extreme pleasure": the robes, food, bedding, medicine, and all requisites obtained from others, whether by the Dharma or against the Dharma, he cherishes, plays with, and enjoys, not regarding the peril, not knowing deliverance — this is the one extreme. And there is a certain kind of person who is fond of pursuing the enjoyment of the "extreme of the practice of self-mortification": by measureless gateways he broils and presses himself, receiving the extreme of bitter torment — whether relying on thorns, or relying on ashes-dust, or relying on a wooden pestle, or relying on a wooden board, or dwelling in a fox-squat, or sitting in a fox-squat, he cultivates the yoga of cutting-off; or again he serves fire (that is, attending upon the fire up to three times); or again he mounts the water (that is, mounting up his water up to three times); or he stands on one foot and turns following the sun; or the remaining classes of such kind cultivate the practice of self-mortification — this is the second extreme. In this way is it named falling into the two extremes.

What is named being unable to bring deliverance? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who, by some precept or restraint, grasps at it through a 〔wrong〕 view, saying, "By this precept or restraint of mine I shall attain purity, liberation, deliverance." All the restraint-precepts held by the outsiders, though well guarded and well made pure — such as their purity is — are yet not named deliverance. In this way is it named being unable to bring deliverance.

What is named ruin of what was received? It is like this: there is a certain kind of person who is altogether without shame, who has no regard for the śramaṇa's 〔portion〕, who transgresses the pure precepts and practices all evil dharmas, inwardly harboring rot while outwardly showing chastity and truth, like the snail born in pure water, giving off the conch's cry and going the dog's way 〔behaving like a dog〕 — truly no śramaṇa, yet calling himself a śramaṇa; truly no practitioner of the pure life, yet calling himself a practitioner of the pure life. In this way is it named ruin of what was received.

In brief, by such ten causal conditions, it is named "loss of the precepts." The World-Honored One sometimes says "loss of śīla," and sometimes again says "the hardship of śīla"; it should be known that among those causal conditions, by two causal conditions — namely "being unable to bring deliverance" and "ruin of what was received" — 〔the World-Honored One speaks of the hardship of śīla〕; and by the remaining causal conditions, it should be known that he says only "loss of śīla."

The white-class causal conditions contrary to these causal conditions that establish the black class should be known to be named "fullness of śīla, purity of śīla."

(e) The Six Verses · Alternative Names of Śīla

In one place, the World-Honored One proclaims that śīla is named "the root." As the verse says: 〔Verse〕 If one dwells well in the root, one's mind is then at peace; 〔thereby〕 through the noble view and the evil view, one is set apart as corresponding and not-corresponding.

In one place, the World-Honored One proclaims that śīla is named "the adornment." As the verse says: 〔Verse〕 The bhikṣu and the bhikṣuṇī, complete in the adornment of the precepts; able to renounce the unwholesome, able to cultivate the wholesome.

In one place, the World-Honored One proclaims that śīla is named "the anointing fragrance." As the verse says: 〔Verse〕 The bhikṣu and the bhikṣuṇī, complete in the anointing fragrance of the precepts; able to renounce the unwholesome, able to cultivate the wholesome.

In one place, the World-Honored One proclaims that śīla is named "the wafting fragrance." As the verse says: 〔Verse〕 Ānanda! There is a class of fragrance that, downwind, can waft well, and upwind can waft too, and so likewise waft both down and upwind.

In one place, the World-Honored One proclaims that śīla is named "excellent conduct." As the verse says: 〔Verse〕 Excellent bodily conduct can call forth lovable maturations; in the present life and in the life to come, excellent verbal conduct is likewise.

In one place, the World-Honored One proclaims that śīla is named "restraint." As the verse says: 〔Verse〕 All those who are lords of munificent giving, complete in the precepts and dwelling in restraint, who have the āgama 〔the noble teaching〕 view, and the right view of the fruit 〔of karma〕.

And there is also this saying: dwelling in the full precepts, being well able to guard the restraint of the individual liberation, and so on as extensively said.

Question: for what reason does the World-Honored One proclaim that śīla is named "the root"? Answer: the sense of "that which is able to establish," the sense of "that which is able to sustain," these are the sense of "root." Because this śīla establishes and sustains all that is mundane and supramundane, and causes the merits of blameless, most excellent, foremost bliss to be produced and to be realized, therefore śīla is said to be named the root. It is like the great earth, which establishes and sustains all herbs, plants, and thickets and forests, causing them to be produced and to grow; śīla is likewise, as extensively said before.

Question: for what reason does the World-Honored One proclaim that śīla is named "the adornment"? Answer: the remaining worldly marvelous adornments — earrings, finger-rings, wrist-bracelets, arm-bracelets, jeweled seals, gold and silver, flower-garlands, and the like — if worn and put on by those of tender years, black hair, youth, full vigor, and lovely form, are somewhat increased in marvelous beauty; but if worn and put on by the decayed and aged, the failing, those whose teeth have fallen and whose hair is white, those past eighty or ninety years, they are then without marvelous beauty (excepting only in play-acting to make the crowd laugh); and if worn when beset by the suffering of illness, by lack of goods and wealth, or at the time of the death of kin, they too are without marvelous beauty. But the adornment of the precepts, for every class and at every time, is marvelously beautiful in whoever wears it. Therefore śīla is named the adornment.

Question: for what reason does the World-Honored One proclaim that śīla is named "the anointing fragrance"? Answer: because by this pure, blameless, marvelously-wholesome śīla that is received, one is able rightly to dispel the bodily-and-mental burning-vexation "of which all the evil precepts received are the cause." It is like the time of most extreme scorching heat, when by anointing with sandalwood, dragon-brain fragrance, and the like, all the sultry steaming is dispelled. Therefore śīla is said to be named the anointing fragrance.

Question: for what reason does the World-Honored One proclaim that śīla is named "the wafting fragrance"? Answer: for the person, the pudgala, who is complete in the precepts, throughout every quarter the sound of his marvelously-wholesome praise and fame is heard everywhere. It is like the manifold root-fragrances, stalk-fragrances, and the like, which, following the wind, drift and scatter throughout every quarter, delightfully fragrant, flowing round and reaching afar. Therefore śīla is named the wafting fragrance.

Question: for what reason does the World-Honored One proclaim that śīla is named "excellent conduct"? Answer: because this pure wholesome conduct of śīla is able to proceed toward marvelous bliss, to go to the marvelous heavenly destinies, to head toward marvelous security, it is named excellent conduct.

Question: for what reason does the World-Honored One proclaim that śīla is named "restraint"? Answer: because this pure wholesome Dharma of śīla is guarding-in-nature, is stilling-and-dispelling in characteristic, is keeping-far-away in essence, it is named restraint.

(f) The Three Contemplations That Are Causes of Purity — Contemplating Bodily, Verbal, and Mental Action

Again, restraint by the precepts has three kinds of "characteristic-of-the-cause-of-purity by contemplation." Which three? First, contemplating bodily action; second, contemplating verbal action; third, contemplating mental action.

How does one contemplate these actions, causing the restraint by the precepts all to attain purity? It is that, when about to do, or just about to do, a bodily action, one contemplates thus: "This bodily action of mine — is it such as can harm oneself, and harm others, of unwholesome nature, able to give rise to manifold suffering, drawing on a suffering maturation? Or is it such as neither harms oneself nor harms others, of wholesome nature, able to give rise to manifold bliss, drawing on a blissful maturation?" Having contemplated thus: if one knows of oneself that this bodily action of mine harms oneself and harms others, is of unwholesome nature, able to give rise to manifold suffering, drawing on a suffering maturation, then with respect to this action one draws back and does not do it, and does not give it means; if one knows of oneself that this bodily action of mine harms neither oneself nor others, is of wholesome nature 〔the rest as said before〕, then with respect to this action one does not draw back, but does it and gives it means. And with respect to the bodily actions already done in the past, one contemplates again and again: "This bodily action of mine — was it such as can harm oneself 〔the rest as said before〕"; having contemplated thus, if one knows of oneself that it harmed oneself and harmed others, then before the wise fellow practitioners of the pure life one reveals it as it really is and repents and removes it in accord with the Dharma; if one knows of oneself that it harmed neither oneself nor others, then one gives rise to joy, dwelling at peace day and night, and following it much in one's training. In this way, with respect to the bodily actions done in the past, future, and present, he is able well to contemplate and able well to make pure.

As with bodily action, so with his verbal action, it should be known to be likewise.

〔Mental action:〕 By reason of a past deed there arises mind; by reason of a future deed there arises mind; by reason of a present deed there arises mind; and with respect to just this mind one contemplates again and again: "This mental action of mine — is it such as can harm oneself 〔the rest as said before〕"; having contemplated thus, if one knows of oneself that this mental action of mine is of the black class, then with respect to this action one draws back and does not give rise to it, and does not give it means; if one knows of oneself that it is of the white class, then with respect to this action one does not draw back, but gives rise to it and gives it means. In this way, with respect to the mental actions given rise to in the past, future, and present, he is able well to contemplate and able well to make pure. Why so? All the śramaṇas and brāhmaṇas of the past, future, and present, with respect to the three kinds of action — bodily, verbal, and mental — whether already contemplated, or yet to be contemplated, or now contemplating, whether already made pure, or yet to be made pure, or now making pure, whether already dwelt much in, or yet to be dwelt much in, or now dwelling much in — all of it is by contemplating thus and making pure thus.

As the Buddha, the World-Honored One, once said for the venerable Rāhula: 〔Verse〕 You, now, Rāhula! In bodily, verbal, and mental action, should contemplate rightly again and again, keeping in mind the noble teaching of the buddhas. Rāhula! You should train in this śramaṇa's deed; if you can train in this, there is only the excellent-and-wholesome, and no evil.

If, with respect to such bodily, verbal, and mental action, one deliberates rightly and closely, "These actions of mine — are they such as can harm oneself" 〔extensively said as before〕, this is named contemplating; if, with respect to one portion, one draws back and does not do it, and does not give it means 〔extensively said on down to revealing, repenting, and removing it〕, and again, with respect to one portion, one does not draw back but does it and gives it means 〔extensively said on down to giving rise to joy, dwelling at peace day and night, and following it much in one's training〕, this is named making pure.

(g) The Ten Kinds of Excellent Merit

Restraint by the precepts, thus made pure, should be known to have ten kinds of merit and excellence. Which ten?

It is that all the persons, the pudgalas, complete in the precepts, on beholding of themselves that their precepts are pure, thereupon attain "non-remorse"; because of non-remorse there is "gladness"; because of gladness there arises "joy"; because the mind is joyful, the body attains "pliancy"; because the body is pliant one then receives "excellent bliss"; because of bliss the mind is "concentrated"; because the mind attains concentration one is able to "know as it really is and to see as it really is"; because of really knowing-and-seeing one is then able to "give rise to disenchantment"; because of being able to give rise to disenchantment one then attains "freedom from defilement"; because of freedom from defilement one realizes "liberation"; because of attaining liberation one then knows-and-sees of oneself, "I am liberated," on up to "I am able, in the sphere of parinirvāṇa without remaining basis, to be one who will attain parinirvāṇa." In this way the person, the pudgala, complete in the precepts, by the augmenting power of the purity of śīla, attains non-remorse and, gradually, on up to being able to reach nirvāṇa. This is named the first merit and excellence of the restraint by the precepts.

Again there is a pudgala complete in the precepts who, at the time of death, gives rise to this thought: "I have well done bodily, verbal, and mental conduct; I have not evilly done bodily, verbal, and mental conduct" 〔on down to as extensively said〕; if there be any destiny to which those who make merit-deeds, who make wholesome deeds, who are able to rescue from all dreads should go, to that destiny I shall assuredly go — thus does he attain the second non-remorse, "being able to go to the good destiny." By this pudgala free of remorse-and-regret, he is named one who "dies well, deceases well, passes on well." This is named the second merit and excellence.

Again there is a pudgala complete in the precepts, throughout every quarter of whom the sound of his marvelously-wholesome praise and fame is heard everywhere. This is named the third merit and excellence.

Again there is a pudgala complete in the precepts who sleeps at peace and wakes at peace, keeping far from all bodily-and-mental burning-vexation. This is named the fourth merit and excellence.

Again there is a pudgala complete in the precepts who, whether sleeping or waking, is protected by the gods. This is named the fifth merit and excellence.

Again there is a pudgala complete in the precepts who, over the violence of others, does not fret over their evil, being without all dreads, his mind free of alarm and fright. This is named the sixth merit and excellence.

Again there is a pudgala complete in the precepts of whom those fond of killing, enemies and evil companions, even should they find their opening, yet constantly extend protection — knowing that this is a person, a pudgala, complete in the precepts, they either act as good friends or dwell in the middle, evenly 〔doing no harm〕. This is named the seventh merit and excellence.

Again there is a pudgala complete in the precepts of whom all the demons, yakṣas, house-spirits, and non-human kinds, even should they find their advantage or find their opening, yet constantly extend protection — namely, by the augmenting power of being complete in śīla. This is named the eighth merit and excellence.

Again there is a pudgala complete in the precepts who, with respect to the Dharma is without hardship, and from others obtains the manifold gains — namely robes, food and drink, bedding, medicine for illness, and all requisites; by reason of the augmenting causal power in dependence on śīla, the king, the great ministers, and all the common folk, wealthy elders, and caravan-leaders and the like revere and honor him. This is named the ninth merit and excellence.

Again there is a pudgala complete in the precepts, all of whose vows are fulfilled as he would have them: if, in the desire-realm, he vows and delights to be reborn in a great kṣatriya lineage-house, or a great brāhmaṇa lineage-house, or the great lineage-houses of the householders, or the great lineage-houses of the elders, or among the like-portioned of the Heaven of the Four Great Kings, or the Heaven of the Thirty-Three, or the Yāma Heaven, or the Tuṣita Heaven, or the Heaven of Delight-in-Emanation, or the Heaven of Mastery-over-Others'-Emanations — because his precepts are pure, then in accord with his vow he will attain rebirth there; if he vows and delights to enter the meditative absorptions' blissful dwelling in the present life, or to dwell or to be reborn among the like-portioned of the heavens of form — because his precepts are pure he then attains freedom from desire, and his vows are all fulfilled; if he vows and delights in the stilled resolution that surpasses the concentrations of form, entering the formless concentrations and dwelling therein in fullness, or he will attain rebirth among the like-portioned of the formless heavens 〔the rest as said before〕; if he vows and delights to realize the most extremely ultimate nirvāṇa — because his precepts are pure he then realizes the entire ultimate freedom from desire. This is named the tenth merit and excellence.

In this way, then, has been spoken the aggregate of the precepts' extensive distinguishing, its loss, its completion, its alternative gateways, its contemplation and purification, and all its merits and excellences. Herein is proclaimed and clearly revealed, in every kind and characteristic, the restraint by the precepts of śīla, most extremely full and subsumed under the provisions. If there be good sons who of themselves love and delight in the śramaṇa-nature or the brāhmaṇa-nature, they should diligently train in it.

聲聞地 · 初瑜伽處 · 出離地·根律儀+飲食知量The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · The First Yoga-Station · Deliverance — Restraint of the Faculties and Moderation in Eating

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

二道資糧十四門,戒律儀之後是第五門「根律儀」(守護六根門)、第六門「飲食知量」(如量而食)。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;嗢拕南壓縮處以〔〕補回所略。

第五門·根律儀

什麼是根律儀?就是譬如有一類人,能善安住、密護根門,防守正念、常委正念,以念防心,行於平等位;眼見色已,不取其相、不取隨好〔不執總相別相〕;耳聞聲、鼻嗅香、舌甞味、身覺觸,也各不取其相、不取隨好;乃至意了法已,同樣不取其相、不取隨好。〔下逐目廣釋。〕

密護根門·防守正念·常委正念

什麼名為密護根門?就是防守正念、常委正念,廣說乃至防護意根,及正修行意根律儀。如此名為密護根門。

什麼名為防守正念?就是譬如有一類人,由密護根門的增上力,攝受多聞、思惟、修習;由聞思修的增上力,獲得正念;為令這所得的正念無忘失、能趣證、不失壞,於時時中即於多聞、若思、若修,正作瑜伽、正勤修習,不息加行、不離加行。如此由這多聞思修所集成的念,於時時中善能防守正聞思修的瑜伽作用。如此名為防守正念。

什麼名為常委正念?就是於此念「恒常所作、委細所作」——恒常所作名「無間作」,委細所作名「殷重作」;這無間所作、殷重所作,總說名為常委正念。如其所有的防守正念,便於此念能不忘失;如其所有的常委正念,便於不忘失念得任持力;即由這樣的功能勢力,制伏色聲香味觸法。

念防護意·行平等位

什麼名為念防護意?就是眼、色為緣生眼識,眼識無間生分別意識;由此分別意識,於可愛色將生染著、於不可愛色將生憎恚——即由這樣念的增上力,能防護這「非理分別起煩惱」的意,令它不生所有煩惱。耳、鼻、舌、身也廣說如此。意、法為緣生意識,這意識有與非理分別俱行而能起煩惱者;由此意識於可愛法將生染著、於不可愛法將生憎恚——也由這念的增上力,能防護它,令不生煩惱。如此名為念防護意。

什麼名為行平等位?「平等位」就是或善捨、或無記捨。由他對這非理分別起煩惱的意善加防護後,正行於善捨、無記捨中,由是說名行平等位。如此名為行平等位。

不取相·不取隨好(二相防護)

怎樣對這非理分別起煩惱的意能善防護?就是於色聲香味觸法「不取其相、不取隨好」,終不依彼發生諸惡不善尋思、令心流漏;若有時由忘失念、或由煩惱極熾盛,雖已離取相及取隨好,卻又發生惡不善法令心流漏,便修律儀。由這二相,故能善防護。

怎樣由這二相善防護後,正行善捨或無記捨?就是由這二種相。哪二相?就是如所說「防護眼根,及正修行眼根律儀」;耳鼻舌身意根也如此。由這二相,於善捨、無記捨中令意正行。

什麼名為於眼所識色中不取其相?「取相」者,就是於眼識所行的色中,由眼識取所行相,這名為執取其相。若能遠離這眼識所行的境相,名為不取其相。如在眼所識色中一樣,在耳所識聲、鼻所識香、舌所識味、身所識觸,以及意所識法中,也都依此理解。

什麼名為於眼所識色中不取隨好?「取隨好」者,就是於眼所識色中,眼識無間俱生的分別意識,執取所行境相,或能起貪、或起瞋、或起癡,這名為執取隨好。若能遠離這所行相、於此所緣不生意識,名為不取隨好。如在眼所識色中一樣,在耳所識聲、鼻所識香、舌所識味、身所識觸,以及意所識法中,也都不取隨好。

又有另一類的「取相、取隨好」:「取相」者,就是色境界在可見處,能生作意正現在前,眼見眾色——這名執取其相。「取隨好」者,就是色境在可見處、眼見色已,然而他先時從他人聽聞「有如是如是眼所識色」,便隨所聞的名句文身為增上、為依、為住,這樣的人隨其所聞而種種分別眼所識色——這名執取隨好。如在眼所識色中一樣,在耳所識聲、鼻所識香、舌所識味、身所識觸,以及意所識法中,也都依此理解。這取相與取隨好有兩種結果:有時由這一因緣、依處和增上力,發生種種惡不善法,使心向外流漏;有時雖有同樣因緣、依處和增上力,卻不生惡不善法,也不使心流漏。若其中的取相、取隨好不合正理,並因此發生惡不善法、令心流漏,修行者便對這一類色境遠離取相與取隨好。

什麼名為惡不善法?就是諸貪欲,及貪所起的諸身、語、意惡行;若諸瞋恚、若諸愚癡,及二者所起的諸身語意惡行。這名種種惡不善法。

什麼名為「由彼令心流漏」?就是若於那些所緣境界,心、意、識生起,遊行流散;即於那些境界與心意識種種相應,能起所有身語惡行、貪瞋癡生,遊行流散。這名為由彼令心流漏。

如此於眼所識色乃至意所識法中,執取相、取隨好,由是發生種種雜染;他能遠離取相取隨好,便不發生種種雜染。

若由忘念、或由煩惱極熾盛,雖獨自閑居,由先所見眼所識色、或先所受耳鼻舌身意所識法的增上力而發生惡不善法,隨所發生而不執著,便速疾斷滅、除棄、變吐〔吐出捨離〕,這名於彼修行律儀。

若於眼所識色中應策眼根、乃至於意所識法中應策意根,便於彼作意策發〔提策振作〕;這樣策發令不雜染,由是於此雜染防護眼根乃至防護意根。若於眼所識色中不應策發眼根、乃至意根,便於彼遍一切種而不策發;不策發故令不雜染。由是於此雜染修根律儀。如此名為能正修行眼根律儀乃至意根律儀。如此已廣分別根律儀相。

根律儀略義(兩番)

怎樣應知此中略義?這略義就是:若能防護、若所防護、若從防護、若如防護、若正防護,這一切總略為一,名根律儀。此中問「誰能防護」?能防護者,就是防守正念,以及所修習的常委正念。再問「防護什麼」?所防護者,就是眼根、耳根、鼻根、舌根、身根,乃至意根。再問「從什麼境界加以防護」?就是從可愛或不可愛的色境開始,乃至從可愛或不可愛的法境中,對諸根作正防護。再問「用什麼方式防護」?就是不取其相、不取隨好;若依是處發生惡不善法令心流漏,即於此處修行律儀(防守根故名修律儀)。最後問「什麼是正防護」?就是由正念防護分別意識,使它行於善捨或無記捨的平等位,這才名為正防護。

又略義者:若防護方便、若所防護事、若正防護,總略為一名根律儀。什麼是「防護方便」?就是防守正念、常委正念,眼見色乃至意知法不取相不取隨好,若依任何一處發生種種惡不善法、使心流漏,便正在那一處修行律儀;因為守護諸根,所以名為修習律儀。如此名為防護方便。什麼是「所防護事」?就是眼色乃至意法。如此名為所防護事。什麼是「正防護」?就是由正念防護於意、行平等位。

二種根律儀(思擇力·修習力)

又根律儀略有二種:一、思擇力所攝,二、修習力所攝。

「思擇力所攝根律儀」者,就是於境界深見過患,而不能於這所有過患除遣斷滅。「修習力所攝根律儀」者,就是於境界深見過患,亦能於這所有過患除遣斷滅。又由思擇力所攝根律儀,於所緣境令煩惱「纏」不復生起、不復現前,而於依附所依的「隨眠」,不能斷除、不能永拔;由修習力所攝根律儀,於所緣境煩惱隨眠不復生起、不復現前,一切時分依附所依的所有隨眠也能斷除、能永拔。如此思擇力、修習力二種根律儀,有此差別、此意趣、此殊異。應知思擇力所攝根律儀是「資糧道」所攝,修習力所攝根律儀當知墮在「離欲地」攝。

第六門·飲食知量

什麼名為於食知量?就是譬如有一類人,由正思擇而食所食:不為倡蕩、不為憍逸、不為飾好、不為端嚴〔乃至廣說〕。

正思擇·觀段食三過患

什麼名為「由正思擇食於所食」?「正思擇」者,就是以妙慧等隨觀察段食的過患;見過患已、深生厭惡,然後吞咽。怎樣觀見過患?就是於這所食段食,或觀「受用種類過患」、或觀「變異種類過患」、或觀「追求種類過患」。

什麼是受用種類過患?就是譬如有一,將要食時,所受段食的色香味觸皆悉圓滿、甚為精妙;從此無間進至口中,牙齒咀嚼、津唾浸爛、涎液纏裹、轉入咽喉——那時此食先前所有的悅意妙相一切皆捨,轉成可惡穢相,當其變異時狀如變吐〔嘔吐物〕。能食的人若正思念這一位的穢相,對其餘未變的一切精妙飲食,尚且不能安住食的欣樂,何況此位?由這樣種種相貌漸次受用的增上力,令其飲食的淨妙相沒、過患相生,為不淨所攝。這名為於食受用種類的過患。

什麼是變異種類過患?就是這飲食既噉食已,一分消變,至中夜或後夜分,於身中便生起養育增長血、肉、筋、脈、骨、髓、皮等眾多種種品類的諸不淨物;次後一分變成糞穢,變已趣下、展轉流出,由是日日須數數洗淨;或手、足、餘支節誤觸著時,若自若他皆生厭惡。又由此緣,發生身中多種疾病——所謂癰、痤、乾癬、濕癬、疥、癩、疽、疔、上氣、咳嗽、皰漿、噦噎、乾消、癲癇、寒熱、黃病、熱血、陰㾽〔諸病名〕,如此等類無量疾病由飲食而於身中生起;或由所食不平和,於身中不消而住。這名為飲食變異種類的過患。

什麼是追求種類過患?就是於飲食的追求有多過患:應知共有六類:一是積集飲食所作的過患,二是防護所得所作的過患,三是壞失親愛所作的過患,四是無有厭足所作的過患,五是不得自在所作的過患,六是因飲食造作惡行所作的過患。

「於食積集所作過患」——就是譬如有一,為食的緣故,寒時為寒所逼、熱時為熱所逼,種種策勵、劬勞勤苦:營農、牧牛、商估、計算、書數、雕印及其餘工巧業處,為了得到尚未得到的飲食,或為了積聚飲食;如同直接為飲食而作,凡為飲食因緣而作的種種事業,也都依此理解;這樣勤苦求時,若所作事業不諧遂,由是愁憂燋惱、拊胸傷歎、悲泣迷悶〔歎〕「我這功夫怎麼白費無果」?這名於食積集所作過患。

「於食防護所作過患」——就是所作業若諧遂了,又為守護而起大憂慮:唯恐我財寶當為王、賊侵奪,或火焚、水漂,或宿世惡業當令滅壞,或現非理作業當令散失,或為非愛、宿共財者所奪,或家中生火,由是令財寶虧損。這名於食防護所作過患。

「於食壞親愛所作過患」——就是世間為食的緣故多起鬪諍:父子、母女、兄弟、朋友尚且會為飲食彼此非毀,何況不是親里的人,豈會不因飲食而展轉鬪訟?所謂大族婆羅門、剎帝利、長者、居士,為食迭興違諍,以手足、土塊、刀杖互相加害。這名於食壞親愛所作過患。

「於食無厭足所作過患」——就是諸國王剎帝利種,位登灌頂,仍於自國王都聚落不住喜足,俱帥兵戈互相征討:吹貝角、扣鍾鼓,揮刀、槃矟、放箭、𥎞矛,車馬象步交橫馳亂,種種戈仗傷害其身,或致死、或等死苦。此外還有其餘同類的征戰傷害。以上名為於食無有厭足所作的過患。

「因食不得自在所作過患」——就是譬如一類為王所使、討伐堅城,遭種種極熱脂油、熱牛糞汁及鎔銅鐵相注灑,或被戈杖傷身,或致死、或等死苦。此外還有其餘同類的逼害。以上名為因食而不得自在所作的過患。

「因食起諸惡行所作過患」——就是譬如有一,為食的緣故造作積集身諸惡行(語、意惡行亦爾);臨命終時為諸重病苦所逼切,由先所作身語意種種惡行的增上力,於日後分見有諸山、或山峯垂影懸覆、近覆、極覆,便作念:「我自昔來依身語意所造諸業唯罪非福;若有那造惡者當生的趣,我今定往。」這樣追悔已,便即捨命;既捨命已,隨業差別生諸惡趣——所謂那洛迦〔地獄〕、傍生、餓鬼。這名因食惡行所作過患。

總之,這種段食在追求之時已有上述種種過患,在取得後受用之時也有過患,在身中消化轉變之時仍有過患。

段食少勝利·如子肉想

又這段食有少分勝利。怎樣?就是這身由食而住、依食而立,非無食〔能存〕。怎樣名為「有少勝利」?就是這依食而住的身,最極久住或經百年;若善加將養,或過少分,或未滿而便夭沒。若只修「此身暫住」之行,非為妙行;若只於「身暫時住」而生喜足,非妙喜足,也非領受飲食所作的圓滿無罪功德勝利。若不只修身暫住行、也不只於身暫住生喜足,而即依此暫時住的身修集梵行令得圓滿,纔是妙行、妙喜足,又能領受飲食所作的圓滿無罪功德勝利。

應自思惟:「我若與愚夫同分、修諸愚夫同分之行,非我所宜;我若於這下劣段食的少分勝利安住喜足,也非我宜。」若於這樣遍一切種的段食過患圓滿知已,以正思擇深見過患而求出離。為求這食的出離,便「如子肉想」而食段食〔如食愛子之肉,但為續命、毫無貪味〕。應作念:「那些施主極大艱難積集財寶、具受廣大追求的種種過患,由悲愍故、求勝果故,如割皮肉及以刺血而相惠施;我得此食,宜應這樣方便受用——如法自處、無倒受用,報施主恩,令他獲最勝大果、大利、大榮、大盛。」當隨「月喻」往施主家〔如月清涼利人,入施主家令其清涼得益〕,盪滌身心、安住慚愧。

遠離憍傲,不自高舉、不輕蔑他;如自己獲得利養心生喜悅,於他人所得利養心也喜悅。又應這樣自持其心往施主家:豈有出家者往詣他所,「要望他施、非不惠施,要望他敬、非不恭敬,要多非少、要妙非麁、要速非緩」?應作這樣的心往施主家:縱不惠施,終不於彼起怨害心、瞋恚心而相嫌恨——唯恐我由此瞋心的增上緣,身壞後生諸惡趣多受困厄;同樣,即使對方不恭敬而非恭敬,只施少量而非多量,只施麁食而非妙食,或施與遲緩而非速疾,也都終不對他生起怨害心、瞋恚心而互相嫌恨;否則仍會由怨害與瞋恚的增上緣力,身壞後生於惡趣,多受困厄。又我應依所食段食,發起如是正行,並於其量如實了達:「我命根由此不滅,又於此食不苦耽著,纔能隨順攝受梵行。」如此我今住沙門性、住出家性,受用飲食如法清淨、遠離眾罪。由這些相,以正思擇而食所食。

四食·段食·食之異名

什麼是「所食」?就是四種食:一、段食,二、觸食,三、意等思食,四、識食。今此義中是說段食。這又是什麼?就是餅、麨、飯、羹、臛〔肉羹〕、糜、粥、酥油、糖、蜜、魚、肉、菹鮓〔醃菜醃魚〕、乳、酪、生酥、薑、鹽、酢等種種品類,和雜為摶、段段吞食,故名段食。所言「食」者,就是飡、噉、咀嚼、吞咽、甞、啜、飲等的名稱差別。

不為倡蕩·憍逸·飾好·端嚴

什麼名為「不為倡蕩」?就是譬如有一樂受欲者,為受諸欲而食所食,他作這樣的思:「我食所食,令身飽滿、令身充悅;過了日晚到夜分,當與姝妙嚴飾的女人共為嬉戲、歡娛受樂、倡掉縱逸。」所謂「倡蕩」,於此聖法毘奈耶中是說受欲者被欲貪所引、婬逸所引的所有惡不善尋思;由此食噉時令諸根皆掉舉、令意躁擾、令意不安、令意不靜。若為此事而食,名為倡蕩食於所食。諸有多聞聖弟子眾,以思擇力深見過患、善知出離而食所食,不像前說的受欲者,所以名為「不為倡蕩」。

什麼名為「不為憍逸、不為飾好、不為端嚴」?就是譬如有一樂受欲者,為受諸欲而食,他作這樣的思:「我今宜多食、飽食,隨力隨能食噉肥膩、增房補益、色香味俱精妙的飲食;過今夜到明日,於『角武事』〔競技〕當有力能。」所謂按摩、拍毱、托石、跳躑、蹴蹋、攘臂、扼腕、揮戈、擊劍、伏弩、控弦、投輪、擲索,依這等角武事當得勇健、膚體充實、長夜無病、久時少壯、不速衰老、壽命長遠、能多噉食、食已能正消化、除諸疾患——這樣是為「無病憍逸、少壯憍逸、長壽憍逸」而食。

既角武已,又作這樣的思:「我應沐浴。」便以種種清淨香水沐浴其身;沐浴已梳理其髮;梳理髮已,種種妙香塗身;既塗身已,又以種種上妙衣服、花鬘、嚴具莊飾其身。此中沐浴、理髮、塗香,名為「飾好」;既飾好已,又以上妙衣服花鬘嚴具莊飾其身,名為「端嚴」。如此總名為飾好、為端嚴而食所食。他既這樣憍逸、飾好、端嚴已,於日中分或日後分臨欲食時,飢渴並至,於諸飲食極生悕欲、極欣、極樂,不見過患、不知出離,隨得隨食;又數數倡蕩、憍逸、飾好、端嚴,多食多飲令身充悅。諸有多聞聖弟子眾,以思擇力深見過患、善知出離而食所食,不像前說受欲者;唯作這樣的念:「我今習近所不應習、所應斷之食,是為了永斷如是食。」

為身安住·為暫支持(二種存養)

什麼名為「為身安住食於所食」?就是飲食已壽命得存、非不飲食壽命得存,名身安住;「我今受此飲食,壽命得存、當不夭沒,由是身得安住、能修正行、永斷諸食。」

什麼名為「為暫支持食於所食」?就是略說有二種存養:一、有艱難存養,二、無艱難存養。「有艱難存養」者,就是受這樣的飲食,數增飢羸、困苦重病;或以非法追求飲食而非以正法,得已染愛、耽嗜、饕餮、迷悶、堅執、湎著而受用;或有食已令身沈重、無所堪能、不任修斷;或食已令心遲鈍不速得定;或食已令出入息來往艱難;或食已令心數為惛沈睡眠所纏擾。這名有艱難存養。「無艱難存養」者,就是受這樣的飲食令無飢羸、無困苦重病;或以正法追求飲食而非非法,獲得已不染不愛、不耽嗜饕餮迷悶堅執湎著而受用,如此受用身無沈重、有所堪能、堪任修斷,令心速疾得三摩地、令出入息無艱難、令心不為惛沈睡眠所纏擾。這名無艱難存養。若由有艱難存養而壽命得存、身得安住,這名有罪、亦有染污;若由無艱難存養而壽命得存、身得安住,這名無罪、亦無染污。諸有多聞聖弟子眾,遠離有罪有染存養、習近無罪無染存養,由是說「為暫支持」。

六為·無罪安隱而住

問:怎樣習近前說無罪無染的存養以自存活?答:若受飲食,「為除飢渴、為攝梵行、為斷故受、為令新受當不更生、為當存養力樂無罪安隱而住」,如此習近無罪無染的存養以自存活。

「為除飢渴」受諸飲食——就是至食時多生飢渴、氣力虛羸、希望飲食,為息此飢渴纏逼而知量食;這樣食用以後,便使自己在非食時不再被飢餓虛羸所纏逼;所謂日暮、夜間,乃至翌日尚未到食時,都不受飢羸逼迫。這就名為「為除飢渴」而受諸飲食。

「為攝梵行」受諸飲食——就是知量受食,由是修善品者於現法、於此日飲食後身無沈重、有所堪能、堪任修斷,令心速疾得三摩地、出入息無艱難、心不為惛眠纏擾,由此便能迅速具有力量與堪能,得到先前未得的法、觸證先前未觸的境、證得先前未證的果。這就名為「為攝梵行」而受諸飲食。

「為斷故受」受諸飲食——就是譬如有一,由過去世食不知量、食所匪宜、不消而食,由是於身中生起種種疾病(疥癩、皰漿、咳嗽等如前廣說),由此發生身中極重猛利熾然的苦惱不可意受;為息除這疾病及其所生苦受,習近良醫所說饒益所宜的醫藥及悅意飲食,由此便能斷除已經生起的疾病,以及由那些疾病因緣所生的苦受。這就名為「為斷故受」而受諸飲食。

「為令新受當不更生」受諸飲食——就是譬如有一,由現在世安樂無病、氣力具足,不過量食、不食匪宜、不重食而令未來食住身中成不消病、或當生身諸疾病(疥癩皰漿咳嗽等),若作那些不如量、不適宜或未消又食之事,未來食物住在身中便會成為不消之病,或生起疥、癩、皰漿、咳嗽等任一身病,並由此生起前說的種種苦受;所以現在知量而食,使這些新的苦受將來不再生起。這就名為「為令新受當不更生」而受諸飲食。

「為當存養力樂無罪安隱而住」受諸飲食——飲食已壽命得存,是名「存養」;若除飢羸,是名為「力」;若斷故受、新受不生,是名為「樂」;若以正法追求飲食、不染不愛乃至受用,是名「無罪」;若受食已身無沈重、有所堪能、堪任修斷,是名「安隱而住」。

所以說「由正思擇食於所食,不為倡蕩、不為憍逸、不為飾好、不為端嚴,乃至廣說」。這名廣辨於食知量。

飲食知量略義(三番)

怎樣應知此中略義?就是從「所受用的是什麼食物」與「以什麼方式進食」兩方面,總攝此處的略義。什麼是所受食?就是諸段食(餅、麨、飯、羹、臛、糜、粥,如前廣說)。怎樣食用?就是正思擇食於所食,不為倡蕩憍逸飾好端嚴乃至廣說。

又應知略義:為攝受對治、為遠離欲樂行邊、為遠離自苦行邊、為攝受梵行而受飲食。怎樣為攝受對治而受飲食?就是所說「由正思擇食於所食」。怎樣為遠離欲樂行邊而受飲食?就是不為倡蕩、不為憍逸、不為飾好、不為端嚴而食。怎樣為遠離自苦行邊而受飲食?就是為除飢渴、為斷故受、為令新受當不更生,以及為當存養、得力、得樂而食。怎樣為攝受梵行而受飲食?就是為攝梵行、為得無罪安隱而住而食。

又應知略義有二種:一、無所食,二、有所食。「無所食」=一切種都無所食,無所食故便夭沒。「有所食」有二:一、平等食,二、不平等食。「平等食」=非極少、非極多、非不宜、非不消、非染污食;「不平等食」=或極少、或極多、或不宜、或不消、或染污食。此中:由平等食非極少食,令身飢羸未生不生、已生斷滅;由非極多食,身無沈重、有所堪能、堪任修斷;由非不宜、非不消食,能斷故受、不生新受,由是當得存養若力若樂;由非染污食,當得無罪安隱而住。而由極少食,雖存壽命卻有飢羸、少存活;由極多食,如極重擔鎮壓其身、不能以時消變;由不消食,或成不消病、或生身病苦(不宜食亦爾,且於身中集諸過患、觸極重病苦);由染污食,非法追求、有染有愛耽嗜饕餮而受用。由受用平等所食、遠離不平等食,故說「於食平等所作」。

這「於食平等所作」,又以諸句廣為宣示開顯,所謂「由正思擇食於所食,不為倡蕩憍逸飾好端嚴」(如前廣說):其中「由正思擇食於所食,不為倡蕩、不為憍逸、不為飾好、不為端嚴,並為身安住、為暫支持」,由此遮止「都無所食」;若又說「為除飢渴、為攝梵行,廣說乃至為無罪安隱而住」,由此遮止「不平等食」。怎樣遮止不平等食?若說「為除飢渴」,由此遮止所食極少;若說「為攝梵行」,由此遮止所食極多;若說「為斷故受、為令新受當不更生」,由此遮止食物未消又食,以及食用所不適宜的食物;若說「為當存養、為當得力」,由此顯示既不極少食、也不極多食;若說「為當得樂」,由此顯示食物消化後才食,並且只食所宜;若說「為當無罪安隱而住」,由此顯示的是無染污食。為什麼?若以非法追求飲食、得已染愛而受用,名染污食、亦名有罪;若於善品勤修者,於住空閑、瑜伽作意、受持讀誦思惟義中,由諸惡不善尋思令心流漏、令心相續隨順趣向臨入而轉,由是不安隱住。這「安隱住」又有二種:一、遠離所食極多,由是身無沈重、堪任修斷;二、於食不生味著,由是遠離諸惡尋思擾動的不安隱住。

所以這一切諸句,皆為宣示開顯「於食平等所作」。如此名為廣略宣說於食知量。

Among the fourteen items of provisions for the twofold path, after the restraint of discipline (戒律儀) comes the fifth item, "restraint of the faculties" (根律儀, the guarding of the six faculty-gates), and the sixth item, "moderation in eating" (飲食知量, eating measure-wise). The term-names are kept as of old; the rendering is line by line into today's language, adding no doctrinal exposition, citing no treatise, glossing no Sanskrit; where the summary verse (嗢拕南, uddāna) compresses, what was abridged is restored back within 〔 〕.

The Fifth Item · Restraint of the Faculties

What is the restraint of the faculties? It is like this: there is a certain class of person able to abide well and closely guard the faculty-gates, to defend right mindfulness and to keep right mindfulness ever at the ready, guarding the mind with mindfulness, coursing in the position of equanimity; the eye, having seen a form, does not grasp at its mark and does not grasp at the accompanying features 〔does not cling to either the general mark or the particular marks〕; the ear having heard a sound, the nose having smelled an odor, the tongue having tasted a flavor, and the body having felt a tangible likewise do not grasp at their marks or accompanying features; down to the mind, having cognized a phenomenon, likewise not grasping at its mark or accompanying features. 〔What follows expounds each item at length.〕

Closely Guarding the Faculty-Gates · Defending Right Mindfulness · Keeping Right Mindfulness Ever at the Ready

What is called closely guarding the faculty-gates? It is defending right mindfulness and keeping right mindfulness ever at the ready, extending broadly down to guarding the mind-faculty and rightly cultivating the restraint of the mind-faculty. This is called closely guarding the faculty-gates.

What is called defending right mindfulness? It is like this: there is a certain class of person who, by the strengthening force of closely guarding the faculty-gates, takes up much learning, reflection, and cultivation; and by the strengthening force of that learning, reflection, and cultivation, obtains right mindfulness; and in order that this right mindfulness once obtained be not lost, be able to lead on to realization, and not fall away, at all times, upon that same much learning, and whether reflecting or cultivating, he rightly does yoga and rightly and diligently cultivates, not resting from the exertion, not departing from the exertion. Thus the mindfulness accumulated out of that much learning, reflection, and cultivation is, at all times, well able to defend the yogic operation of right learning, reflection, and cultivation. This is called defending right mindfulness.

What is called keeping right mindfulness ever at the ready? It is that with regard to this mindfulness one acts "constantly and acts minutely" — what is done constantly is called "acting without interruption," what is done minutely is called "acting with earnest care"; and this acting-without-interruption and acting-with-earnest-care, stated together, is called keeping right mindfulness ever at the ready. According to whatever defending of right mindfulness there is, one is thereby able not to lose this mindfulness; and according to whatever keeping-ever-ready of right mindfulness there is, one gains, in this non-losing of mindfulness, the power to sustain it; and it is precisely by this functional force that one subdues form, sound, smell, taste, touch, and phenomena.

Guarding the Mind with Mindfulness · Coursing in the Position of Equanimity

What is called guarding the mind with mindfulness? It is like this: the eye and form together as condition give rise to eye-consciousness; eye-consciousness without interval gives rise to the discriminating mental consciousness; through this discriminating mental consciousness, toward an agreeable form defilement-and-attachment is about to arise, and toward a disagreeable form aversion-and-anger is about to arise — and it is precisely by the strengthening force of such mindfulness that one is able to guard this mind that "gives rise to afflictions through unprincipled discrimination," causing it not to give rise to any afflictions. The ear, nose, tongue, and body are also to be expounded at length in this way. The mind and phenomena together as condition give rise to mental consciousness, and this mental consciousness has that which, coursing together with unprincipled discrimination, is able to give rise to afflictions; through this mental consciousness, toward an agreeable phenomenon defilement-and-attachment is about to arise, and toward a disagreeable phenomenon aversion-and-anger is about to arise — also by the strengthening force of this mindfulness one is able to guard it, causing it not to give rise to afflictions. This is called guarding the mind with mindfulness.

What is called coursing in the position of equanimity? The "position of equanimity" is either wholesome equanimity or indeterminate equanimity. After he has well guarded this mind that gives rise to afflictions through unprincipled discrimination, he rightly courses in wholesome equanimity and in indeterminate equanimity, and for that reason it is called coursing in the position of equanimity. This is called coursing in the position of equanimity.

Not Grasping at the Mark · Not Grasping at the Accompanying Features (the Twofold-Mark Guarding)

How is it that toward this mind which gives rise to afflictions through unprincipled discrimination one is able to guard well? It is that toward form, sound, smell, taste, touch, and phenomena one "does not grasp at their mark and does not grasp at the accompanying features," so as never, in dependence on them, to give rise to any evil, unwholesome cogitations that make the mind leak and flow; and if at some time, through loss of mindfulness, or because affliction is exceedingly blazing, one has already departed from grasping the mark and grasping the accompanying features, yet again gives rise to evil, unwholesome states that make the mind leak and flow, one then cultivates restraint. By these two marks, therefore, one is able to guard well.

How is it that after one has, by these two marks, guarded well, one rightly courses in wholesome equanimity or indeterminate equanimity? It is by these two kinds of mark. Which two marks? They are, as was said, "guarding the eye-faculty, and rightly cultivating the restraint of the eye-faculty"; and so too for the ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-faculties. By these two marks one causes the mind to course rightly in wholesome and indeterminate equanimity.

What is called, among the forms cognized by the eye, not grasping at their mark? "Grasping the mark": it is that, among the forms ranged over by eye-consciousness, one grasps by eye-consciousness the mark ranged over — this is called grasping at its mark. If one is able to keep far from this object-mark ranged over by eye-consciousness, it is called not grasping at the mark. As with forms cognized by the eye, so too with sounds cognized by the ear, odors by the nose, flavors by the tongue, tangibles by the body, and phenomena by the mind: each is to be understood in the same way.

What is called, among the forms cognized by the eye, not grasping at the accompanying features? "Grasping the accompanying features": it is that, among the forms cognized by the eye, the discriminating mental consciousness that co-arises without interval upon eye-consciousness grasps the object-mark ranged over, and there arises either greed, or anger, or delusion — this is called grasping at the accompanying features. If one is able to keep far from this ranged-over mark, and toward this object does not give rise to mental consciousness, it is called not grasping at the accompanying features. As with forms cognized by the eye, so too with sounds cognized by the ear, odors by the nose, flavors by the tongue, tangibles by the body, and phenomena by the mind: in each case one does not grasp at the accompanying features.

There is, further, another kind of "grasping the mark, grasping the accompanying features." "Grasping the mark": it is that a form-object, being in a visible place, is able to give rise to attention rightly present before one, and the eye sees the many forms — this is called grasping at its mark. "Grasping the accompanying features": it is that a form-object, being in a visible place, and the eye having seen the form, yet he had earlier heard from another person that "there is such-and-such a form cognized by the eye," and so, taking the names, phrases, and syllables he has heard as the strengthener, as the support, as the abode, such a person, according to what he has heard, discriminates in various ways the form cognized by the eye — this is called grasping at the accompanying features. As with forms cognized by the eye, so too with sounds cognized by the ear, odors by the nose, flavors by the tongue, tangibles by the body, and phenomena by the mind: each is to be understood in the same way. This grasping of the mark and of the accompanying features has two possible results: in some cases, through this cause, this basis, and this strengthening, various evil and unwholesome states arise and make the mind leak and flow; in other cases, despite such cause, basis, and strengthening, no evil or unwholesome state arises and the mind does not leak and flow. If the grasping of the mark and accompanying features is contrary to right principle and thereby gives rise to evil and unwholesome states that make the mind leak and flow, the practitioner keeps far from grasping the mark and accompanying features toward that class of form-object.

What is called evil, unwholesome states? They are the various greeds, and the various evil actions of body, speech, and mind that arise from greed; and the various angers, and the various delusions, and the various evil actions of body, speech, and mind that arise from these two. These are called the various evil, unwholesome states.

What is called "by them the mind is made to leak and flow"? It is that if, toward those object-fields, mind, mentation, and consciousness arise and go roaming and scattering; if, precisely toward those fields, mind, mentation, and consciousness are variously associated, and there can arise all evil actions of body and speech, and greed, anger, and delusion arise, roaming and scattering — this is called "by them the mind is made to leak and flow."

Thus, among the forms cognized by the eye down to the phenomena cognized by the mind, grasping the mark and grasping the accompanying features gives rise thereby to the various defilements; when he is able to keep far from grasping the mark and grasping the accompanying features, the various defilements do not arise.

If, through loss of mindfulness, or because affliction is exceedingly blazing, even while dwelling alone in seclusion, through the strengthening force of forms cognized by the eye and formerly seen, or of phenomena cognized by the ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind and formerly experienced, there arise evil, unwholesome states, then, as they arise, he does not cling to them, but quickly cuts them off, dispels and casts them away, and vomits them out 〔spits out and relinquishes them〕 — this is called, toward them, cultivating restraint.

If, among the forms cognized by the eye, the eye-faculty is to be spurred on, down to: if, among the phenomena cognized by the mind, the mind-faculty is to be spurred on, he then, toward them, applies attention to spur and rouse 〔to prod and rally〕; spurring and rousing them thus so that they are not defiled, he thereby, toward this defilement, guards the eye-faculty down to guards the mind-faculty. If, among the forms cognized by the eye, the eye-faculty is not to be spurred and roused, down to the mind-faculty, he then, toward them, does not spur and rouse them in every kind whatsoever; and because he does not spur and rouse them, they are made not to be defiled. He thereby, toward this defilement, cultivates the restraint of the faculties. This is called being able rightly to cultivate the restraint of the eye-faculty down to the restraint of the mind-faculty. Thus has the mark of the restraint of the faculties been expounded at length.

The Condensed Meaning of the Restraint of the Faculties (Two Rounds)

How is the condensed meaning here to be known? This condensed meaning is: that which is able to guard, that which is guarded, that from which one guards, the manner in which one guards, and the right guarding — all these, gathered briefly into one, are called the restraint of the faculties. Here one asks, "Who is able to guard?" That which is able to guard is defending right mindfulness together with the cultivated keeping-ever-ready of right mindfulness. "What does one guard?" That which is guarded is the eye-faculty, ear-faculty, nose-faculty, tongue-faculty, body-faculty, and mind-faculty. "From what objects does one guard?" One rightly guards the faculties from agreeable or disagreeable forms, down to agreeable or disagreeable mental phenomena. "By what manner does one guard?" By not grasping the mark and not grasping the accompanying features; if, in dependence on that ground, there arise evil, unwholesome states that make the mind leak and flow, then, precisely at that ground, one cultivates restraint (because it guards the faculties it is called cultivating restraint). "What is right guarding?" By right mindfulness one guards the discriminating mind and causes it to course in the balanced position of wholesome or neutral equanimity; this is called right guarding.

Again, the condensed meaning is: the means of guarding, the thing that is guarded, and the right guarding, gathered briefly into one, are called the restraint of the faculties. What are "the means of guarding"? They are defending right mindfulness, keeping right mindfulness ever at the ready; the eye seeing form down to the mind knowing phenomena, not grasping the mark and not grasping the accompanying features; and if, in dependence on that ground, there arise evil, unwholesome states that make the mind leak and flow, then, precisely at that ground, one cultivates restraint; because this guards the faculties, it is called cultivating restraint. This is called the means of guarding. What is "the thing that is guarded"? It is the eye and form down to the mind and phenomena. This is called the thing that is guarded. What is "right guarding"? It is by right mindfulness guarding the mind and coursing in the position of equanimity.

The Two Kinds of Restraint of the Faculties (the Power of Discernment · the Power of Cultivation)

Again, the restraint of the faculties is, in brief, of two kinds: first, that subsumed under the power of discernment; second, that subsumed under the power of cultivation.

"The restraint of the faculties subsumed under the power of discernment" is that one deeply sees the peril in the object-field, but is not able, toward all this peril, to dispel it and cut it off and annihilate it. "The restraint of the faculties subsumed under the power of cultivation" is that one deeply sees the peril in the object-field, and is also able, toward all this peril, to dispel it and cut it off and annihilate it. Again, by the restraint of the faculties subsumed under the power of discernment, toward the object taken as condition, the "enwrapment" of affliction is made to arise no more, to be present no more; but toward the "latent proclivity" clinging to and adhering to its basis, one is not able to cut it off, not able to uproot it forever. By the restraint of the faculties subsumed under the power of cultivation, toward the object taken as condition, the latent proclivity of affliction is made to arise no more, to be present no more; and at all times whatsoever, all the latent proclivities clinging to and adhering to their basis are also able to be cut off, able to be uprooted forever. Thus the two kinds of restraint of the faculties — of the power of discernment and of the power of cultivation — have this difference, this intent, and this distinction. It should be known that the restraint of the faculties subsumed under the power of discernment is subsumed under the path of provisions, and the restraint of the faculties subsumed under the power of cultivation should be known to fall within, and be subsumed under, the stage of freedom from desire.

The Sixth Item · Moderation in Eating

What is called moderation in eating? It is like this: there is a certain class of person who, by rightly discerning, eats what is to be eaten — not for wanton play, not for intoxicated indulgence, not for adornment, not for beautification 〔and so on at length〕.

Rightly Discerning · Contemplating the Three Perils of Material Food

What is called "by rightly discerning, eating what is to be eaten"? "Rightly discerning" is that with excellent wisdom one contemplates in due order the peril of material food; and having seen the peril, one gives rise to deep disgust, and only then swallows. How does one contemplate and see the peril? It is that, toward this material food to be eaten, one contemplates either "the peril of the class of enjoyment," or "the peril of the class of transformation," or "the peril of the class of seeking."

What is the peril of the class of enjoyment? It is like this: there is a certain one who, when he is about to eat, has the color, smell, taste, and touch of the material food he receives all complete and exceedingly fine; and from there, without interval, it advances into the mouth, and the teeth chew it, spittle soaks it soft, saliva enwraps it, and it turns down into the throat — and at that time all the pleasing fine marks that this food formerly had are utterly relinquished, and it turns into a loathsome, filthy mark, its condition when it alters being like vomit 〔the matter of vomiting〕. If the one able to eat rightly bears in mind the filthy mark of this one phase, then even toward all the other, not-yet-altered, exceedingly fine food and drink he is unable to abide in the joy of eating — how much more at this phase? By the strengthening force of thus enjoying it in gradual succession through such marks and features, the pure and fine mark of his food and drink sinks away and the mark of peril arises, and it is subsumed under the impure. This is called the peril of the class of enjoyment in eating.

What is the peril of the class of transformation? It is that this food and drink, once it has been eaten, one portion is digested and transformed, and by the middle watch or the last watch of the night there arise within the body the many, various kinds of impure substances that nourish and increase blood, flesh, sinews, veins, bone, marrow, skin, and the rest; and the next portion transforms into feces, and having transformed, it heads downward and, turning and turning, flows out, so that day by day one must repeatedly wash clean; and if the hands, feet, or other limbs accidentally touch it, whether oneself or another, all give rise to disgust. And by this condition there arise within the body many kinds of illnesses — namely, boils, sores, dry ringworm, wet ringworm, scabies, leprosy, carbuncles, ulcers, panting, cough, blisters, hiccups and choking, wasting, epilepsy, chills and fever, jaundice, hot blood, and the hidden-part disorder 〔the names of various maladies〕 — thus and so, measureless illnesses arise within the body through food and drink; or, through what is eaten being not in balance, it does not digest but lodges within the body. This is called the peril of the class of transformation in food and drink.

What is the peril of the class of seeking? It is that in the seeking of food and drink there are many perils: six kinds should be known: first, the peril made by amassing food; second, the peril made by guarding what has been gained; third, the peril made by ruining what is dear; fourth, the peril made by insatiability; fifth, the peril made by lack of mastery; sixth, the peril made by evil conduct for the sake of food.

"The peril made by hoarding in eating" — it is like this: there is a certain one who, for the sake of food, when it is cold is oppressed by cold, when it is hot is oppressed by heat, and in various ways drives and exhausts himself in bitter toil: farming, herding cattle, trading, reckoning, writing and figuring, engraving and printing, and the other crafts and occupations, in order to gain food not yet gained or to amass food; just as these occupations are undertaken directly for food, so too are all the undertakings that serve as conditions for food to be understood; and when, toiling bitterly thus in the seeking, the enterprise he undertakes does not go smoothly, he thereby grieves and worries, is scorched with distress, beats his breast and laments, weeps and is stupefied 〔laments〕, "How is it that this labor of mine has been squandered without fruit?" This is called the peril made by hoarding in eating.

"The peril made by guarding in eating" — it is that when the enterprise undertaken has gone smoothly, again, for the sake of protecting it, one gives rise to great anxiety: fearing only that my wealth and treasure will be seized and plundered by kings or thieves, or burned by fire, or swept away by water, or that past-life evil karma will cause it to be ruined, or that present unprincipled undertakings will cause it to be scattered and lost, or that it will be seized by the unloved, or by those with whom one shares wealth from a former life, or that fire will break out in the house, thereby causing the wealth and treasure to be diminished. This is called the peril made by guarding in eating.

"The peril made by ruining what is dear in eating" — it is that in the world, for the sake of food, there frequently arise quarrels and disputes: fathers and sons, mothers and daughters, brothers, and friends still revile one another for food and drink; how much more would those who are not kin fail to turn upon one another in dispute for food? Namely, the great clans of brahmins, kṣatriyas, elders, and householders, for the sake of food, again and again raise up strife, and with hands and feet, clods of earth, blades and staves harm one another. This is called the peril made by ruining what is dear in eating.

"The peril made by insatiability in eating" — it is that the kings of kṣatriya kind, having ascended to the rank of consecration, still, toward their own realm's royal capitals and settlements, do not abide content, and together lead their troops and weapons to attack one another: they blow conch-horns, strike bells and drums, brandish blades and lances, shoot arrows and hurl spears; chariots, horses, elephants, and foot-soldiers dash across and rush about in confusion; the various blades and staves harm their bodies, bringing about either death or sufferings equal to death. There are still further injuries of the same kind arising from warfare. All these are called the peril made by insatiability in eating.

"The peril, on account of food, of not gaining mastery" — it is like this: a certain class of person, employed by a king to attack a firm citadel, meets with various things — exceedingly hot lard and oil, hot cow-dung juice, and molten copper and iron poured and sprinkled upon him, or is wounded in body by blade and staff, bringing about either death or sufferings equal to death. There are still further coercions and injuries of the same kind. All these are called the peril, on account of food, of not gaining mastery.

"The peril, on account of food, of giving rise to evil conduct" — it is like this: there is a certain one who, for the sake of food, commits and amasses the evil actions of the body (evil actions of speech and mind likewise); and when his life is about to end, oppressed by the sufferings of grave illness, by the strengthening force of the various evil actions of body, speech, and mind formerly committed, in the latter part of the day he sees mountains, or the shadows of mountain peaks hanging down and covering him, drawing near to cover, extremely covering, and he then thinks: "The deeds I have done from of old in dependence on body, speech, and mind are all sin and not merit; if there is a destiny into which those who do evil are to be reborn, I now shall surely go there." Having thus regretted, he then relinquishes his life; and having relinquished his life, according to the difference of his karma he is reborn in the evil destinies — namely, the naraka 〔the hells〕, the animal realm, and the hungry ghosts. This is called the peril made by evil conduct on account of food.

In sum, material food has the foregoing perils already while it is being sought, has perils after it is gained and enjoyed, and still has perils while it is digested and transformed within the body.

The Slight Benefit of Material Food · The Thought "As of the Flesh of One's Child"

Again, this material food has a slight portion of benefit. How so? It is that this body abides through food and stands in dependence on food, and does not [survive] without food. How is this called "having a slight benefit"? It is that this body which abides in dependence on food, at the very utmost, abides long, or passes a hundred years; if well nourished, [it lasts] a little beyond, or, before that is fulfilled, it dies young. If one cultivates only the practice of "this body's temporary abiding," it is no excellent practice; if one gives rise to contentment merely with "the body's abiding for a time," it is no excellent contentment, nor is it the receiving of the complete, faultless meritorious benefit that food and drink accomplish. If one does not cultivate only the practice of the body's temporary abiding, nor give rise to contentment merely with the body's temporary abiding, but, in dependence upon this temporarily-abiding body, cultivates and gathers the holy life so as to bring it to completion — this alone is excellent practice, excellent contentment, and is furthermore the receiving of the complete, faultless meritorious benefit that food and drink accomplish.

He should reflect thus of himself: "If I were of one lot with fools and cultivated the practice that is of one lot with fools, it would not befit me; if, toward this inferior material food's slight portion of benefit, I were to abide content, it would also not befit me." If, toward the peril of material food in every kind whatsoever, he has thus fully known it, then, rightly discerning and deeply seeing the peril, he seeks deliverance. In order to seek this deliverance from food, he then eats material food "with the thought as of the flesh of one's child" 〔as one eats the flesh of a beloved child, only to continue life, with not the least craving for its taste〕. He should think: "Those donors, with exceedingly great hardship, amass wealth and treasure, and undergo the various perils of vast seeking; and out of compassion, and to seek an excellent fruit, as though cutting their own skin and flesh and drawing their own blood, they bestow it upon me; having gained this food, I ought to enjoy it in such a skillful way — dwelling in accord with the Dharma, enjoying without error, requiting the donors' kindness, so as to cause them to gain the most excellent great fruit, great benefit, great glory, great flourishing." One should go to the donor's house in accord with "the simile of the moon" 〔as the moon, cool and refreshing, benefits people, and entering the donor's house makes them cool and benefited〕, washing clean body and mind, and abiding in conscience and shame.

Keeping far from pride and arrogance, not exalting oneself, not disdaining others; as one delights in mind at gaining gain and support for oneself, so too one delights in mind at others' gaining gain and support. And one should thus hold one's mind in going to the donor's house: How should there be a renunciant who goes to another's dwelling "requiring that he give and not fail to give, requiring that he revere and not fail to revere, requiring much and not little, requiring the fine and not the coarse, requiring the swift and not the slow"? One should go to the donor's house with a mind like this: even if he does not give, still one never gives rise, toward him, to a mind of harm or a mind of anger and resents him — fearing only that, by the strengthening condition of this angry mind, after the body's breaking up I should be reborn in the evil destinies and undergo much distress; Likewise, even if the donor does not show reverence, gives little rather than much, gives coarse rather than fine food, or gives slowly rather than swiftly, one never gives rise toward him to a mind of harm or anger and does not resent him; otherwise, through the strengthening condition of harm and anger, after the body's breakup one would still be born in an evil destiny and undergo much distress. And I ought, in dependence on the material food I eat, to give rise to such right practice, and, as to its measure, to understand truly as it is: "My life-faculty is by this not extinguished; and toward this food I do not bitterly crave, and so I am able to conform to and take up the holy life." Thus I now abide in the nature of a recluse, abide in the nature of one gone forth, enjoying food and drink in accord with the Dharma, pure, keeping far from the many sins. By these marks, by rightly discerning, one eats what is to be eaten.

The Four Foods · Material Food · The Synonyms of Food

What is "what is to be eaten"? It is the four kinds of food: first, material food; second, food of contact; third, food of mental volition; fourth, food of consciousness. In the present sense, what is spoken of is material food. And what is this again? It is cakes, parched grain, boiled rice, broth, meat-broth 〔a broth of flesh〕, gruel, congee, ghee-oil, sugar, honey, fish, meat, pickled vegetables and pickled fish 〔salted greens and salted fish〕, milk, curd, fresh butter, ginger, salt, vinegar, and the like — various kinds mixed together into a ball, and swallowed piece by piece; hence it is called material food. What is spoken of as "eating" is the differing names of feeding, gorging, chewing, swallowing, tasting, sipping, drinking, and so on.

Not for Wanton Play · Intoxicated Indulgence · Adornment · Beautification

What is called "not for wanton play"? It is like this: there is a certain one delighting in the enjoyment of desires, who for the sake of enjoying the desires eats what is to be eaten, thinking thus: "I eat what is to be eaten so as to make the body full and to make the body glad; and when the day grows late and passes into the night watches, I shall together with fair, finely-adorned women sport and play, take pleasure and delight, wantonly frolic and give myself to license." What is called "wanton play" is, in this noble Dharma and Vinaya, said to be all the evil, unwholesome cogitations, drawn on by the greed for desires and drawn on by lascivious license, of one who enjoys desires; through this, when he feeds and gorges, all the faculties are made agitated, the mind is made restless, the mind is made unquiet, the mind is made unstill. If one eats for the sake of this matter, it is called eating what is to be eaten for wanton play. All the many learned noble disciples, by the power of discernment deeply seeing the peril, and well knowing deliverance, eat what is to be eaten, and are not like the enjoyer of desires spoken of above; therefore it is called "not for wanton play."

What is called "not for intoxicated indulgence, not for adornment, not for beautification"? It is like this: there is a certain one delighting in the enjoyment of desires, who for the sake of enjoying the desires eats, thinking thus: "I ought now to eat much and eat to the full, and, as far as my strength and ability allow, to feed on fatty, rich food that increases the chamber-work and supplements and benefits, food fine in color, smell, and taste alike; so that when this night passes and the next day comes, in the 'contests of martial skill' 〔athletic competitions〕 I shall have the strength and ability." Namely, massaging, ball-batting, stone-lifting, leaping, kicking, baring the arm, gripping the wrist, brandishing the halberd, striking with the sword, drawing the crossbow, pulling the bowstring, throwing the discus, and hurling the lasso; in dependence on these contests of martial skill I shall become brave and hale, my skin and body solid and full, through the long night free of illness, for a long time young and vigorous, not swiftly aging, my lifespan long and far-reaching, able to feed on much, and after feeding able to digest well, and free from the various maladies — thus, it is for the sake of "the intoxicated indulgence of the healthy, the intoxicated indulgence of the young and vigorous, the intoxicated indulgence of the long-lived" that he eats.

Having finished the contest of martial skill, he again thinks thus: "I ought to bathe." And so with the various kinds of pure fragrant water he bathes his body; having bathed, he combs and dresses his hair; having combed his hair, he anoints his body with various fine perfumes; having anointed his body, he further, with various superb garments, flower-garlands, and ornaments, adorns his body. Herein, the bathing, hair-dressing, and anointing with perfume are called "adornment"; and having adorned himself, further adorning his body with superb garments, flower-garlands, and ornaments is called "beautification." Thus, taken together, it is called eating what is to be eaten for adornment and for beautification. Having thus indulged himself intoxicatedly, adorned, and beautified, when at midday or in the latter part of the day he is about to eat, hunger and thirst arrive together, and toward all food and drink he gives rise to exceeding craving, exceeding delight, exceeding pleasure, not seeing the peril, not knowing deliverance, eating whatever he gets as he gets it; and again and again he wantonly plays, intoxicatedly indulges, adorns, and beautifies himself, eating much and drinking much to make the body glad. All the many learned noble disciples, by the power of discernment deeply seeing the peril, and well knowing deliverance, eat what is to be eaten, and are not like the enjoyer of desires spoken of above; they think only thus: "I now draw near to and practice a food I ought not to practice, that ought to be cut off — and this is in order forever to cut off such food."

For the Body's Abiding · For Temporary Sustenance (the Two Kinds of Maintaining)

What is called "for the body's abiding, eating what is to be eaten"? It is that having eaten and drunk, the lifespan is preserved, and not that without eating and drinking the lifespan is preserved — this is called the body's abiding; "I now receive this food and drink, and the lifespan is preserved, and I shall not die young, and thereby the body gains its abiding, is able to cultivate right practice, and forever cuts off the various foods."

What is called "for temporary sustenance, eating what is to be eaten"? It is that, stated briefly, there are two kinds of maintaining: first, maintaining with hardship; second, maintaining without hardship. "Maintaining with hardship" is that one receives such food and drink as repeatedly increases hunger and emaciation, distress and grave illness; or one seeks food and drink by what is not the Dharma and not by the right Dharma, and having gained it, enjoys it with defiled craving, addiction, gluttony, stupefaction, obstinate clinging, and wallowing; or, having eaten, the body is made heavy, incapable of anything, unfit to cultivate cutting-off; or, having eaten, the mind is made dull and does not swiftly gain concentration; or, having eaten, the in-breath and out-breath are made to come and go with hardship; or, having eaten, the mind is repeatedly beset and disturbed by the enwrapment of dullness and drowsiness. This is called maintaining with hardship. "Maintaining without hardship" is that one receives such food and drink as makes one free of hunger and emaciation, free of distress and grave illness; or one seeks food and drink by the right Dharma and not by what is not the Dharma, and having gained it, enjoys it undefiled and uncraving, without addiction, gluttony, stupefaction, obstinate clinging, and wallowing; and enjoying it thus, the body is without heaviness, has some capacity, is fit to cultivate cutting-off, makes the mind swiftly gain concentration (samādhi), makes the in-breath and out-breath free of hardship, makes the mind not beset by the enwrapment of dullness and drowsiness. This is called maintaining without hardship. If, by maintaining with hardship, the lifespan is preserved and the body gains its abiding, this is called having sin and having defilement; if, by maintaining without hardship, the lifespan is preserved and the body gains its abiding, this is called without sin and without defilement. All the many learned noble disciples keep far from the maintaining that has sin and defilement, and draw near to and practice the maintaining that is without sin and without defilement; therefore it is said "for temporary sustenance."

The Six "For the Sake Of" · Dwelling Faultlessly and at Ease

Question: How does one draw near to and practice the maintaining without sin and without defilement, spoken of above, so as to keep oneself alive? Answer: If, in receiving food and drink, it is "for the sake of dispelling hunger and thirst, for the sake of taking up the holy life, for the sake of cutting off the old feeling, for the sake of causing that a new feeling shall not arise afresh, for the sake of nourishing strength and ease to come, and dwelling faultlessly and at ease" — thus one draws near to and practices the maintaining without sin and without defilement so as to keep oneself alive.

"For the sake of dispelling hunger and thirst" one receives all food and drink — it is that when it comes to eating-time, much hunger and thirst arise, one's vital strength is emaciated and weak, and one hopes for food and drink; in order to still this oppression by the enwrapment of hunger and thirst, one eats measure-wise; having thus eaten, at a time that is not the proper eating-time one is no longer oppressed by the enwrapment of hunger and emaciation — namely, late in the day, during the night, and down to the next day before eating-time. This is called receiving food and drink for the sake of dispelling hunger and thirst.

"For the sake of taking up the holy life" one receives all food and drink — it is that eating measure-wise, thereby one who cultivates the wholesome factors, in the present life, on this day after food and drink, has the body without heaviness, has some capacity, is fit to cultivate cutting-off, makes the mind swiftly gain concentration (samādhi), makes the in-breath and out-breath free of hardship, makes the mind not beset by the enwrapment of dullness and drowsiness, and thereby swiftly has the strength and ability to gain what has not yet been gained, contact what has not yet been contacted, and realize what has not yet been realized. This is called receiving food and drink for the sake of taking up the holy life.

"For the sake of cutting off the old feeling" one receives all food and drink — it is like this: there is a certain one who, through eating without measure in a past time, eating what was unfit, and eating without digesting, thereby gave rise within the body to various illnesses (scabies, leprosy, blisters, cough, and the rest as expounded at length above), and through this there arose within the body exceedingly grave, fierce, blazing, distressful, disagreeable feelings; in order to still and dispel this illness and the suffering-feelings it gives rise to, he draws near to and practices the medicines and the pleasing food and drink, beneficial and fitting, spoken of by a good physician, and thereby is able to cut off illnesses already arisen together with the suffering-feelings produced by those illnesses and their conditions. This is called receiving food and drink for the sake of cutting off the old feeling.

"For the sake of causing that a new feeling shall not arise afresh" one receives all food and drink — it is like this: there is a certain one who, being in the present time at ease and free of illness, with vital strength complete, does not eat beyond measure, does not eat the unfit, does not eat over-heavily, and thereby avoids the contrary: if one ate beyond measure, ate what was unfit, or ate again before the former food was digested, future food would lodge within the body and become an illness of indigestion, or some bodily illness — scabies, leprosy, blisters, cough, and the rest — would arise, and through it the various suffering-feelings described above would arise. Therefore one eats measure-wise now so that these new feelings will not arise again in the future. This is called receiving food and drink for the sake of causing that a new feeling shall not arise afresh.

"For the sake of nourishing strength and ease to come, and dwelling faultlessly and at ease" one receives all food and drink — having eaten and drunk, the lifespan is preserved: this is called "nourishing"; if hunger and emaciation are dispelled, this is called "strength"; if the old feeling is cut off and a new feeling does not arise, this is called "ease"; if one seeks food and drink by the right Dharma, undefiled and uncraving down to enjoying it [thus], this is called "faultless"; if, having received the food, the body is without heaviness, has some capacity, is fit to cultivate cutting-off, this is called "dwelling at ease."

Therefore it is said, "by rightly discerning, one eats what is to be eaten, not for wanton play, not for intoxicated indulgence, not for adornment, not for beautification, and so on at length." This is called the extensive exposition of moderation in eating.

The Condensed Meaning of Moderation in Eating (Three Rounds)

How is the condensed meaning here to be known? It is that the condensed meaning is gathered under two questions: "What food is received?" and "In what manner is it eaten?" "What food is received?" The various material foods (cakes, parched grain, boiled rice, broth, meat-broth, gruel, congee, as expounded at length before). "In what manner is it eaten?" By rightly discerning one eats what is to be eaten, not for wanton play, intoxicated indulgence, adornment, or beautification, and so on at length.

Again, the condensed meaning should be known: for the sake of taking up the counteragent, for the sake of keeping far from the extreme of the practice of desire-pleasure, for the sake of keeping far from the extreme of the practice of self-mortification, and for the sake of taking up the holy life, one receives food and drink. How does one receive food for the sake of taking up the counteragent? As stated, by rightly discerning one eats what is to be eaten. How does one receive food for the sake of keeping far from the extreme of desire-pleasure? One does not eat for wanton play, intoxicated indulgence, adornment, or beautification. How does one receive food for the sake of keeping far from the extreme of self-mortification? One eats for the sake of dispelling hunger and thirst, cutting off the old feeling, causing that a new feeling shall not arise afresh, and obtaining future nourishment, strength, and ease. How does one receive food for the sake of taking up the holy life? One eats for the sake of taking up the holy life and attaining a faultless dwelling at ease.

Again, the condensed meaning should be known to be of two kinds: first, having nothing to eat; second, having something to eat. "Having nothing to eat" = in every kind whatsoever having nothing to eat, and because of having nothing to eat one then dies young. "Having something to eat" is of two: first, balanced eating; second, unbalanced eating. "Balanced eating" = eating that is not too little, not too much, not unfit, not undigested, not defiled; "unbalanced eating" = eating that is either too little, or too much, or unfit, or undigested, or defiled. Herein: by balanced eating that is not-too-little eating, the body's hunger and emaciation, not yet arisen, is made not to arise, and, already arisen, is cut off; by not-too-much eating, the body is without heaviness, has some capacity, is fit to cultivate cutting-off; by not-unfit, not-undigested eating, one is able to cut off the old feeling and not give rise to a new feeling, and thereby shall gain nourishing of strength and of ease; by not-defiled eating, one shall gain a faultless dwelling at ease. Whereas by too-little eating, although the lifespan is preserved, yet there is hunger and emaciation and a scant keeping-alive; by too-much eating, like an exceedingly heavy burden it presses down the body, and one is not able in time to digest and transform it; by undigested eating, either it becomes an undigested illness, or gives rise to the body's sickness and suffering (unfit eating likewise, and moreover it gathers within the body the various perils, and one contacts exceedingly grave illness and suffering); by defiled eating, one seeks by what is not the Dharma, and enjoys it with defilement, craving, addiction, and gluttony. By enjoying balanced food and keeping far from unbalanced eating, therefore it is said "acting in balance toward food."

This "acting in balance toward food" is again, by the several phrases, extensively displayed and disclosed — namely, "by rightly discerning one eats what is to be eaten, not for wanton play, intoxicated indulgence, adornment, or beautification" (as expounded at length before): therein "by rightly discerning one eats what is to be eaten, not for wanton play, intoxicated indulgence, adornment, or beautification, but for the body's abiding and for temporary sustenance," by this one wards off "having nothing at all to eat"; "for the sake of dispelling hunger and thirst, for taking up the holy life, down to a faultless dwelling at ease," by this one wards off "unbalanced eating." How does one ward off unbalanced eating? If it says "for the sake of dispelling hunger and thirst," this wards off eating too little; if it says "for the sake of taking up the holy life," this wards off eating too much; "for the sake of cutting off the old feeling, for causing that a new feeling shall not arise afresh" wards off eating without digesting and eating what is unfit; "for the sake of nourishing strength and for gaining strength to come" displays eating that is not-too-little, not-too-much; "for the sake of gaining ease to come" displays eating after digesting and eating what is fit; "for the sake of a faultless dwelling at ease to come" displays undefiled eating. Why so? If one seeks food and drink by what is not the Dharma, and having gained it enjoys it with defiled craving, it is called defiled eating, and is also called having sin; and if one who diligently cultivates the wholesome factors, while dwelling in emptiness and seclusion, in yogic attention, and in taking up, reciting, and reflecting on the meaning, is made by the various evil, unwholesome cogitations to have the mind leak and flow, to have the continuum of mind conform to, tend toward, and enter upon [defilement] and so turn, thereby one does not dwell at ease. This "dwelling at ease" is again of two kinds: first, keeping far from eating too much, whereby the body is without heaviness and is fit to cultivate cutting-off; second, not giving rise to relish and attachment toward food, whereby one keeps far from the unease of the disturbance of the various evil cogitations.

Therefore all these several phrases are for displaying and disclosing "acting in balance toward food." Thus is it called the exposition, extensive and condensed, of moderation in eating.

聲聞地 · 初瑜伽處 · 出離地 · 覺寤瑜伽+正知而住The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · The First Yoga-Station · Deliverance · The Yoga of Wakefulness + Dwelling with Right Knowing

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

二道資糧十四門,第七門「初夜後夜常勤修習覺寤瑜伽」(晝夜不貪眠、淨修其心)、第八門「正知而住」(一切威儀皆了了正知)。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;嗢拕南壓縮處以〔〕補回所略。

〔本地分中聲聞地第十三初瑜伽處出離地第三之三〕

第七門·初夜後夜常勤修習覺寤瑜伽

復次,「初夜後夜常勤修習覺寤瑜伽」——什麼是初夜?什麼是後夜?什麼是覺寤瑜伽?什麼是常勤修習覺寤瑜伽?

所言「初夜」,就是夜分四分中,過了最初一分,是夜初分。所言「後夜」,就是夜四分中,過了最後一分,是夜後分。〔中間二分為中夜。〕

「覺寤瑜伽」者,就如所說:於晝日分經行、宴坐,從順障法淨修其心;於初夜分經行、宴坐,從順障法淨修其心;淨修心已,出住處外洗濯雙足,還入住處,右脇而臥、重累其足,住光明想、正念、正知、思惟起想,巧便而臥;至夜後分速疾覺寤,經行、宴坐,從順障法淨修其心。

「常勤修習覺寤瑜伽」者,就是譬如有一世尊弟子,聽聞覺寤瑜伽法已、欲樂修學,便依這覺寤瑜伽作這樣的念:「我當成辦佛所聽許的覺寤瑜伽。」發生樂欲、精進勤劬、超越勇猛、勢力發起、勇悍、剛決、不可制伏、策勵其心,無間相續〔不斷地修〕。

經行·宴坐·五蓋·順障法

此中怎樣「於晝日分經行、宴坐,從順障法淨修其心」?所言「晝日」,就是從日出時至日沒時。所言「經行」,就是於廣長、稱其度量的一塊地方,若往、若來相應的身業〔來回行走〕。所言「宴坐」,就是譬如有一,或於大床、或小繩床、或草葉座,結跏趺坐、端身正願、安住背念〔心念背離生死、趣向涅槃〕。

所言「障」者,就是五種蓋。「順障法」者,就是能引蓋、隨順蓋的法。怎樣五蓋?就是貪欲蓋、瞋恚蓋、惛沈睡眠蓋、掉舉惡作蓋、以及疑蓋。怎樣順障法?就是淨妙相〔順貪〕、瞋恚相〔順瞋〕、黑闇相〔順惛眠〕、親屬尋思·國土尋思·不死尋思〔順掉舉〕、追憶昔時笑戲喜樂承事的隨念〔順惡作〕、以及三世或於三世非理的法思〔順疑〕。

問:於經行時,從幾種障法淨修其心?怎樣從彼淨修?答:從惛沈睡眠蓋及能引惛眠的障法淨修其心。為除它,於「光明想」善巧精懇,善取、善思、善了、善達,以有明俱心、有光俱心,或於屏處、或於露處往返經行;經行時隨緣一種淨妙境界,極善示現,勸導、讚勵、慶慰其心——或念佛、或念法、或念僧、或念戒、或念捨、或念天;或於宣說惛沈睡眠過患相應的正法中,以無量門訶責毀呰惛眠的過失、以無量門稱揚讚歎惛眠永斷的功德(所謂契經、應頌、記別、諷誦、自說、因緣、譬喻、本事、本生、方廣、希法、論議〔十二分教〕),於此正法聽聞受持,以大音聲讀誦、為他開示,思惟其義、稱量觀察;或觀方隅、或瞻星月諸宿的道度〔星宿運行〕,或以冷水洗灑面目。由是惛沈睡眠纏蓋未生不生、已生除遣。如此方便,從順障法淨修其心。

問:於宴坐時,從幾種障法淨修其心?怎樣從彼淨修?答:從四種障法淨修其心——就是貪欲、瞋恚、掉舉惡作、疑蓋及能引它們的法。為令已生的貪欲纏蓋速除遣、未生的極遠離,結跏趺坐、端身正願、安住背念:或觀青瘀、或觀膿爛、或觀變壞、或觀膖脹、或觀食噉、或觀血塗、或觀其骨、或觀其鎖、或觀骨鎖〔不淨觀九相〕,或於隨一賢善的定相作意思惟;或於宣說貪欲過患相應的正法中,以無量門訶責毀呰欲貪、欲愛、欲藏、欲護、欲著的過失,以無量門稱揚讚歎一切貪欲永斷的功德(契經應頌記別乃至廣說),於此正法聽聞受持、言善通利、意善尋思、見善通達,即於此法如是宴坐、如理思惟。由是貪欲纏蓋未生不生、已生除遣。如此方便,從順障法淨修其心。

於瞋恚蓋法有差別者——就是這樣宴坐,以慈俱心,無怨、無敵、無損、無惱,廣大無量,極善修習;普於一方發起勝解、具足安住,如是第二、第三、第四,上下傍布,普遍一切無邊世界發起勝解、具足安住〔慈無量〕。其餘如前說。

於掉舉惡作蓋法有差別者——就是這樣宴坐,令心內住、成辦一趣、得三摩地。其餘如前說。

於疑蓋法有差別者——就是這樣宴坐,於過去世、未來世、現在世非不如理作意思惟:「我於過去曾經存在嗎?曾經不存在嗎?我在過去曾經是什麼?曾經怎樣存在?我在未來將是什麼?將怎樣存在?我於現在為何所有?云何而有?今此有情從何而來?於此殞沒當往何所?」於這等不如正理的作意思惟,應正遠離;而如理思惟去來今世,「唯見有法,唯見有事;知有為有、知無為無;唯觀有因、唯觀有果;於實無事不增不益、於實有事不毀不謗,於其實有了知實有」——就是於無常、苦、空、無我一切法中,了知無常、苦、空、無我。能這樣如理思惟,便於佛所無惑無疑;於法、於僧、於苦、於集、於滅、於道、於因及因所生諸法,無惑無疑。其餘如前說。

又於瞋恚蓋應這樣說:為斷瞋恚及瞋恚相,於此正法聽聞受持乃至廣說。於掉舉惡作蓋應這樣說:為斷掉舉惡作及順彼法,於此正法聽聞受持乃至廣說。於疑蓋應這樣說:為斷疑蓋及順彼法,於此正法聽聞受持乃至廣說。如此方便,從貪欲、瞋恚、惛沈睡眠、掉舉惡作、疑蓋及順彼法,淨修其心。所以說「經行、宴坐,從順障法淨修其心」。

法增上·自增上·世增上

如此已說「由法增上」從順障法淨修其心。又有「由自增上」及「由世增上」從順障法淨修其心。

什麼名為由自增上?就是譬如有一,於諸蓋中隨起一種,便自了知「此非善法」,於所生蓋不堅執著,速疾棄捨、擯遣、變吐;又能自觀此所生蓋甚可羞恥,令心染惱、令慧羸劣,是損害品。如此名為由自增上淨修其心。

什麼名為由世增上?就是譬如有一,於諸蓋中隨一已生、或將生時,便作念:「我若生起所未生的蓋,當為大師訶責,亦為諸天及諸有智同梵行者以法輕毀。」他由這世增上,未生諸蓋能令不生、已生諸蓋能速棄捨。如此名為由世增上淨修其心。

右脇而臥·師子王臥法

又為護持諸臥具、順世儀,盡夜初分經行、宴坐,從順障法淨修其心;淨修心已,出住處外洗濯雙足,洗足已還入住處,如法寢臥——為令寢臥長養大種;得增長已,長益其身、轉有勢力、轉能隨順無間常委的善品加行。

問:以何因緣右脇而臥?答:與師子王的臥法相似。問:哪一法相似?答:如師子王,於一切獸中勇悍堅猛、最為第一;比丘也是這樣,於常修習覺寤瑜伽發勤精進、勇悍堅猛、最為第一——由此因緣,與師子王臥法相似,不像其餘的鬼臥、天臥、受欲者臥(那些都嬾墮懈怠、下劣精進、勢力薄弱)。又法理應如此:如師子王右脇而臥,這樣臥時「身無掉亂、念無忘失、睡不極重、不見惡夢」;異於此臥的,與此相違,當知具有一切過失。所以說「右脇而臥,重累其足」。

四巧便臥(光明想·正念·正知·思惟起想)

什麼名為「住光明想巧便而臥」?就是於光明想善巧精懇,善取、善思、善了、善達,思惟諸天光明俱心,巧便而臥;由此因緣,雖復寢臥,心不惛闇。如此名為住光明想巧便而臥。

什麼名為「正念巧便而臥」?就是若諸法已聞、已思、已熟修習,體性是善、能引義利,由正念故乃至睡夢亦常隨轉;由正念故於睡夢中亦常記憶,令彼法相分明現前,即於彼法心多隨觀;由正念故隨其所念,或善心眠、或無記心眠。這名正念巧便而臥。

什麼名為「正知巧便而臥」?就是由正念而寢臥時,若有隨一煩惱現前、染惱其心,於此煩惱生起時能正覺了、令不堅著、速疾棄捨,既通達已令心轉還。這名正知巧便而臥。

什麼名為「思惟起想巧便而臥」?就是以精進策勵其心然後寢臥;於寢臥時時時覺寤,如林野的鹿〔警覺〕,不應一切縱放其心、隨順趣向臨入睡眠。又作念:「我今應於諸佛所許的覺寤瑜伽一切皆當具足成辦;為成辦故,應住精勤、最極濃厚的加行欲樂。」又作念:「我今為修覺寤瑜伽,應正發起勤精進住;為修習諸善法故,應正翹勤、離諸嬾墮、起發具足;過今夜分至明清旦,倍增發起勤精進住、起發具足。」應知此中:由第一思惟起想,無重睡眠,於應起時速疾能起、終不過時方覺;由第二思惟起想,能於諸佛共所聽許的師子王臥如法而臥、無增無減;由第三思惟起想,令善欲樂常無懈廢,雖有失念而能後後展轉受學、令無斷絕。如此名為思惟起想巧便而臥。

後夜速疾覺寤·略義(四正所作事)

什麼名為「至夜後分速疾覺寤,經行、宴坐,從順障法淨修其心」?「夜後分」就是夜四分中過後一分。他由這樣住光明想、正念、正知、思惟起想巧便而臥,於夜中分(夜四分中過於一分)正習睡眠,令於起時身有堪能、應時而起,不被上品惛沈睡眠纏所制伏(令將起時闇鈍、薄弱、嬾墮、懈怠);由無這闇鈍薄弱嬾墮懈怠,暫一作意便無艱難、速疾能起。從諸障法淨修心,如前應知。如此廣辨初夜後夜常勤修習覺寤瑜伽已。

又怎樣知此中略義?就是常勤修習覺寤瑜伽的補特伽羅,略有四種正所作事,哪四種?一者、乃至覺寤〔醒著時〕常不捨離所修善品,於無間常委修善法中勇猛精進;二者、以時而臥,不以非時;三者、無染污心而習睡眠,非染污心;四者、以時覺寤,起不過時。這名四種正所作事。

依這四種正所作事,諸佛世尊為聲聞眾宣說修習覺寤瑜伽。怎樣宣說?「於晝日分經行宴坐從順障法淨修其心,於初夜分經行宴坐從順障法淨修其心」——由此宣說第一正所作事(乃至覺寤常不捨善品、勇猛精進);「出住處外洗濯其足,還入住處,右脇而臥,重累其足」——由此宣說第二正所作事(以時而臥、不以非時);「住光明想、正念、正知、思惟起想巧便而臥」——由此宣說第三正所作事(無染污心而習睡眠);「於夜後分速疾覺寤,經行宴坐從順障法淨修其心」——由此宣說第四正所作事(以時覺寤、起不過時)。

此中所說「住光明想、正念、正知、思惟起想巧便臥」者,顯由二緣「無染污心而習睡眠」——謂由正念、由正知;又由二緣「以時覺寤、起不過時」——謂由住光明想、由思惟起想。這又怎樣?由正念故於善所緣攝斂而臥;由正知故於善所緣若心退失、起諸煩惱即便速疾能正了知——這名由二緣無染污心而習睡眠。由住光明想及思惟起想,無重睡眠、非睡眠纏能遠隨逐——這名由二緣以時覺寤、起不過時。如此宣說覺寤瑜伽的略義,及前所說的廣辨釋義,總名為初夜後夜常勤修習覺寤瑜伽。

第八門·正知而住

什麼名為正知而住?就是譬如有一:若往、若還正知而住,若覩、若瞻正知而住,若屈、若伸正知而住,持僧伽胝及以衣鉢正知而住,若食、若飲、若噉、若甞正知而住,若行、若住、若坐、若臥正知而住,於覺寤時正知而住,若語、若默正知而住,解勞睡時正知而住。

若往·若還

「若往若還正知住」者——怎樣為往?怎樣為還?怎樣往還正知而住?所言「往」者,就是往詣聚落、往聚落間,往詣家屬、往家屬間,往詣道場、往道場間。所言「還」者,就是從聚落還、聚落間還,從家屬還、家屬間還,從道場還、道場間還。所言「往還正知住」者,就是於自往正知「我往」、於自還正知「我還」;於所應往及非所往能正了知,於所應還及非所還能正了知;於應往時及非往時能正了知,於應還時及非還時能正了知;於那如是如是應往及不應往能正了知,於那如是如是應還及不應還能正了知——這名正知。他由成就此正知,自知而往、自知而還;往所應往、非非所往,還所應還、非非所還;以時往還、不以非時;如其色類的動止軌則、禮式、威儀,應往應還,如是而往、如是而還。如此名為若往若還正知而住。

若覩·若瞻

「若覩若瞻正知住」者——什麼是覩?什麼是瞻?怎樣在覩瞻時正知而住?所言「覩」者,就是於如前所列諸事若往若還,先無覺慧、先無功用、先無欲樂,於其中間眼見眾色〔不經意一瞥〕,這名為覩。所言「瞻」者,就是於如前諸事若往若還,覺慧為先、功用為先、欲樂為先而眼見眾色〔有意觀看〕——謂或諸王、或諸王等、或諸僚佐、或諸黎庶、或婆羅門、或諸居士、或饒財長者商主,或餘外物、房舍、屋宇、殿堂、廊廟,或餘世間眾雜妙事,觀見此等,這名為瞻。若於此覩瞻的自相能正了知,於所應覩、所應瞻能正了知,於應覩時、應瞻時能正了知,如所應覩、如所應瞻能正了知,這名正知。他由成就此正知,便自知而覩、自知而瞻;覩所應覩、瞻所應瞻;在應覩時、應瞻時正確覩瞻;依所應覩、所應瞻的方式,如是而覩、如是而瞻。如此名為若覩若瞻正知而住。

若屈·若伸

「若屈若申正知住」者——什麼是屈?什麼是伸?怎樣在屈伸時正知而住?就是他這樣覩時、瞻時,若往為先、若還為先,或屈伸足、或屈伸臂、或屈伸手、或屈伸隨一支節,這名屈伸。若於屈伸的自相能正了知,若所屈伸、若屈伸時、若如是屈如是伸能正了知,這名正知。他由成就此正知,於屈於伸自知而屈、自知而伸;對所應屈、所應伸的支節正確屈伸;在應屈、應伸之時正確屈伸;依所應屈、所應伸的方式,如是而屈、如是而伸。如此名為若屈若伸正知而住。

持僧伽胝及衣鉢

「持僧伽胝及以衣鉢正知住」者——什麼是持僧伽胝?什麼是持衣?什麼是持鉢?怎樣在持僧伽胝、衣、鉢時正知而住?「僧伽胝」謂有大衣,或六十條、或九條等,或兩重刺,名僧伽胝;被服受用、能正將護,說名為持。若有中衣、若有下衣,或持為衣,或有長衣,或應作淨、或已作淨,如此一切說名為衣;被服受用、能正將護,說名為持。若堪受持的或鐵、或瓦乞食應器,說名為鉢;現充受用、能正將護,說名為持。若於這僧伽胝、衣、鉢的自相能正了知,於所應持、或淨或不淨能正了知,於此時已持應持能正了知,於應如是持能正了知,這名正知。他由成就此正知,對應持的僧伽胝、衣、鉢自知而持;持其所應持,並在應持之時正確持用;依所應持的方式如是持用。如此名為持僧伽胝及以衣鉢正知而住。

若食·若飲·若噉·若甞

「若食若飲若噉若甞正知住」者——什麼是食?什麼是飲?什麼是噉?什麼是甞?怎樣在食、飲、噉、甞時正知而住?諸所有受用飲食總名為食,此復二種:一、噉,二、甞。怎樣為噉?就是噉餅、麨、或飯、或糜、或羹、或臛,或有所餘造作轉變可噉可食、能持生命的,如此等類皆名為噉,亦名為食。怎樣為甞?就是甞乳、酪、生酥、熟酥、油、蜜、沙糖、魚、肉、醯〔醋〕、鮓〔醃魚〕,或新果實,或種種咀嚼品類,如此一切總名為甞,亦名為食。怎樣為飲?就是沙糖汁、或石蜜汁、或飯漿飲、或鑽酪飲、或酢為飲、或抨酪飲乃至於水,總名為飲。若於這食飲噉甞的自相能正了知,於一切所食所飲所噉所甞能正了知,於爾時應食應飲應噉應甞能正了知,於如是應食乃至應甞能正了知,這名正知。他由成就此正知,對自己所有的食、飲、噉、甞,自知而食、自知而飲、自知而噉、自知而甞;於所應食、應飲、應噉、應甞者,正食、正飲、正噉、正甞;在應食、應飲、應噉、應甞之時,應時而食、應時而飲、應時而噉、應時而甞;依所應食乃至所應甞的方式,如是而食乃至如是而甞。如此名為若食若飲若噉若甞正知而住。

若行·住·坐·臥·覺寤·語·默·解勞睡

「若行若住廣說乃至若解勞睡正知住」者——什麼是行?什麼是住?什麼是坐?什麼是臥?什麼是覺寤?什麼是語?什麼是默?什麼是解於勞睡?怎樣於行、住、坐、臥、覺寤、語、默,乃至解勞睡時正知而住?

「行」——就是於經行處來往經行,或往詣同法者所,或涉道路,如此等類說名為行。「住」——就是住經行處,住諸同法的阿遮利耶〔軌範師〕、鄔波馱耶〔親教師〕及諸尊長、等尊長前,如此等類說名為住。「坐」——就是或於大床、小繩床、草葉座、諸敷具、尼師檀〔坐具〕,結跏趺坐、端身正願、安住背念,如此等類說名為坐。「臥」——就是出住處外洗濯雙足、還入住處,或於大床、小繩床、草葉座、或阿練若、或樹下、或空閑室,右脇而臥、重疊其足,如此等類說名為臥。「覺寤」——就是於晝日分經行宴坐從順障法淨修其心,於初夜分、後夜分經行宴坐從順障法淨修其心,說名覺寤。「語」——就是常勤修習這覺寤,於未受法正受正習令得究竟(契經應頌記別廣說如前),即於已受法言善通利(以大音聲讀誦、或為他廣說開示),於時時間與諸有智同梵行者、或餘在家賢善者語言談論、共相慶慰(為勸勵及求資具),如此等類說名為語。「默」——就是隨先所聞所習言善通利、究竟諸法,獨處空閑思惟其義、籌量觀察,或處靜室令心內住、等住、安住、近住、調伏、寂靜、最極寂靜、一趣、等持〔九住心〕,或於毘鉢舍那〔觀〕修瑜伽行,如此等類說名為默。「解勞睡」——就是於熱分極炎暑時,或為熱逼、或為劬勞便生疲倦,非時惛寐、樂著睡眠,是名勞睡。若於行乃至解勞睡各自的自相能正了知,於所應行乃至所應解勞睡能正了知,於應行之時乃至應解勞睡之時能正了知,依所應行乃至所應解勞睡的方式能正了知,這名正知。他由成就此正知,對自己的行乃至解勞睡,正知而行乃至正知而解勞睡;凡所應行乃至所應解勞睡,便行其所應行乃至解其所應解的勞睡;在應行乃至應解勞睡之時,便於該時行乃至解勞睡;依所應行乃至所應解勞睡的方式,如是而行乃至如是而解勞睡。如此名為於行、住、坐、臥、覺寤、語、默、解勞睡正知而住。

正知而住的次第(往施主家·應觀不應觀·威儀)

復次,這樣的正知而住,怎樣次第?為顯何事?就是譬如有一,依止這樣的村邑、聚落、亭邏而住,作這樣的思:「我今應往如是村邑聚落亭邏巡行乞食;如是乞已,出還本處。」

又於這村邑等中,有的居家我不應往,哪些?就是唱令家、或酤酒家、或婬女家、或國王家、或旃荼羅羯恥那家;或有一向誹謗、不可迴轉之家。有的居家我所應往——就是剎帝利大族姓家、或婆羅門大族姓家、或諸居士大族姓家、或僚佐家、或饒財家、或長者家、或商主家。又有居家我雖應往,卻不應太早太晚而往;若施主家有急務時不應往,若戲樂時、若有營搆嚴飾事時、若為世間弊穢法時、若忿競時,亦不應往。

又如所往如是應往:不與暴亂的惡象同行,不與暴亂眾車、惡馬、惡牛、惡狗同行,不入鬧叢、不蹈棘刺、不踰垣牆、不越坑塹、不墮山岸、不溺深水、不履糞穢。應隨「月喻」往施主家,具足慚愧、遠離憍傲,盪滌身心,不求利養、不希恭敬;如自己獲得利養心生喜悅,於他人所得利養心亦喜悅;不自高舉、不輕蔑他、心懷哀愍。又應這樣自持其心往施主家:豈有出家者往詣他所,要望他施、非不惠施〔廣說乃至〕要當速疾而非遲緩?又作念:「我今暫往施主家,所受施物應知其量;又我不應為利養而矯詐虛誑、現惑亂相、以利求利。」得利養已,無染、無愛,不耽嗜、饕餮、迷悶、堅執、湎著而受用之。

又於已往、或正往時觀見眾色,於此眾色一分應觀、一分不應觀。於不應觀的眾色當攝其眼、善護諸根;於所應觀的眾色應善住念而正觀察。哪一類色不應觀?就是諸伎樂、戲笑、歡娛,或餘遊戲所作的歌舞音樂等事;又有母邑〔女人〕殊勝,幼少盛年、美妙形色;或餘所見眾色能壞梵行、能障梵行、能令種種惡不善尋思現行——這一類色不應觀視。哪一類色是所應觀?就是諸所有衰老朽邁、上氣者的身,傴僂憑杖戰掉者的身;或諸疾苦重病者的身,腳腫、手腫、腹腫、面腫,膚色萎黃,瘡癬、疥癩,眾苦逼迫,身形委頓、洪爛,諸根闇鈍;或有夭喪、死經一日二日乃至七日,被烏鵲、餓狗、鵄鷲、狐狼、野干種種暴惡禽獸所食噉;或命終已出置高床、上施幰帳,前後大眾或哀或哭,以灰土塵坌身髮,生愁、生苦、生悲、生怨、生憂、生惱——這一類眾色我應觀察;觀這眾色,能順梵行、能攝梵行、能令諸善尋思現行。

不應搖身、搖臂、搖頭、跳躑、携手、叉腰、竦肩而入施主家;不應就坐所不許的座,不應不審觀座而坐,不應放縱一切身分,不應翹足、不應交足、不太狹足、不太廣足,端嚴而坐。不應開紐、不軒〔不掀〕、不磔〔不張〕,亦不褰張〔撩起〕而被法服;所服法衣並皆齊整,不高、不下,不如象鼻,非如多羅樹間的房穗、非如龍首、非如豆摶而被法服。不應持鉢預就其食,不應持鉢在飲食上,不應置鉢在雜穢處、坑澗處、崖岸處。又應次第受用飲食:不應以飯覆羹臛上,不以羹臛覆飯上,不應饕餮受諸飲食,不應嫌恨受諸飲食,不太麁食、不太細食,不應圓摶食,不應舐手、舐鉢,不振手食、不振足食,不應齧斷而食。

從施主家還歸住處,於晝夜分在自別人〔自己分得〕所經行處往返經行,非於他處、非不委處〔非未許之處〕、非不恣處、非不與處而輒經行;非身劬勞、非身疲倦、非心掉舉所制伏時而習經行;為修善品、為善思惟,內攝諸根、心不外亂而習經行,不太馳速、不太躁動,亦非一向專事往來而習經行,時時進步、時時停住而習經行。如此於自所居住處〔自院、自房、自別人處、僧分與處〕經行已,又於大床、小繩床、草葉座、尼師壇,或阿練若、樹下、塚間、空閑室,結跏趺坐、端身正願、安住背念而習宴坐。

於夜中分如法寢息,於晝日分及夜初分修諸善品不應太急;如此寢時應如前說,住光明想、正念、正知、思惟起想;於夜後分速疾覺寤。

或於語論、或於讀誦勤修加行;或為修斷而閑居宴默思惟法時,應當遠離順世的典籍——綺字、綺句、綺飾文詞,能引無義、不能令證神通、等覺、究竟涅槃〔的雜書〕。又於如來所說正法,最極甚深、相似甚深、空性相應,隨順緣性及諸緣起,殷重無間善攝善受,令堅、令住、令無失壞,為成正行、不為利養恭敬稱譽;又於是法言善通利、慧善觀察,於諠雜眾不樂習近、不樂多業、不樂多言,於時時間安住正念;與諸有智同梵行者語言談論、共相慶慰,樂興請問、樂求諸善、無違諍心,言詞稱量、合理、正直、寂靜,樂勤為他宣說正法。又應宴默:於惡不善的尋思不樂尋思,於非理諸法不樂思惟;於自所證離增上慢,於少下劣的差別證中不生喜足,於上所證中無退屈;善能遠離不應思處,時時修習止觀瑜伽,樂斷、樂修,無間修習、殷重修習。

又於熱分極炎暑時,勇猛策勵、發勤精進,隨作一種所應作事,因勞倦而於非時發起惛睡;為此義故暫應寢息,欲令惛睡疾疾除遣、勿經久時損減善品、障礙善品;於寢息時或關閉門、或令苾芻在傍看守、或以毘奈耶隱密軌則以衣蔽身,在深隱處須臾寢息,令諸勞睡皆悉除遣。

如此名為正知而住的先後次第——謂依行時及依住時。又於善品先未趣入時,心興加行、如理作意俱行的妙慧,說名正知;即此正知,於行時、住時一切成辦無所減少。如此名為正知而住。

正知而住略義(行時五業·住時五業·四業)

應知此中,「若往、若還、若覩、若瞻、若屈、若申、持僧伽胝及以衣鉢、若食、若飲、若噉、若甞正知而住」,由是名為「於村邑等如法行時」正知而住;「若行、若住、若坐、若臥、若習覺寤、若語、若默、若解勞睡正知而住」,由是名為「於其住處如法住時」正知而住。如此已廣分別正知而住。

又怎樣知此中略義?就是於行時有五種業、於住時有五種業、行時住時正知而住有四種業,這名正知而住的略義。

怎樣行時五業?一、身業,二、眼業,三、一切支節業,四、衣鉢業,五、飲食業。「若往若還」顯行時身業;「若覩若瞻」顯行時眼業;「若屈若申」顯行時一切支節業;「持僧伽胝及以衣鉢」顯行時衣鉢業;「若食若飲若噉若甞」顯行時飲食業。

怎樣住時五業?一、身業,二、語業,三、意業,四、晝業,五、夜業。「若行若住若坐」顯住時身業;「若語」顯住時語業;「若臥、若默、若解勞睡」顯住時意業;「若習覺寤」顯住時晝業、夜業、身業、語業;又「若臥」顯住時夜業。當知這名住時五業。

怎樣行時住時正知而住的四業?就是初依那行業、住業起如是業,即於彼業安守正念、不放逸住——當知此業是正念所攝、不放逸攝〔第一、第二業〕;若於是事、是處、是時,如量、如理、如其品類所應作的,即於此事、此處、此時,如量、如理、如其品類正知而作〔第三業〕;他由這樣正知而作,於現法中無罪、無犯、無有惡作、無變、無悔,於當來世亦無有罪,身壞死後不墮惡趣、不生一切那落迦中,為得未得積習資糧〔第四業〕。如此名為正知而住的略義。前已廣分別,今此略義,一切總名正知而住。

Of the fourteen doorways of the provisions for the two paths, the seventh doorway is "constantly and diligently cultivating the yoga of wakefulness through the first and last watches of the night" (not craving sleep by day or night; purifying one's mind), and the eighth doorway is "dwelling with right knowing" (being clearly and rightly aware in every posture and deportment). The technical terms are kept in their old forms, and the text is rendered clause by clause into today's language, without adding doctrinal exposition, without citing the treatises, and without annotating the Sanskrit; where the uddāna summary verse has compressed things, what was abbreviated is restored within 〔brackets〕.

〔Within the Basic Section, the Śrāvaka Stage, the thirteenth; the First Yoga-Station; the Stage of Deliverance, the third; the third part thereof.〕

The Seventh Doorway · Constantly and Diligently Cultivating the Yoga of Wakefulness through the First and Last Watches of the Night

Furthermore, as to "constantly and diligently cultivating the yoga of wakefulness through the first and last watches of the night" — what is the first watch? What is the last watch? What is the yoga of wakefulness? What is constantly and diligently cultivating the yoga of wakefulness?

What is called the "first watch" is this: of the four divisions of the night, once the very first division has passed, this is the first portion of the night. What is called the "last watch" is this: of the four divisions of the night, once the very last division has passed, this is the last portion of the night. 〔The middle two divisions are the middle of the night.〕

As for the "yoga of wakefulness," it is just as was stated: during the daytime portion, walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, purifying one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances; during the first-watch portion of the night, walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, purifying one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances; and when the mind has been purified, going outside the dwelling-place and washing both feet, then returning into the dwelling-place, lying down on the right side with the feet stacked one upon the other, abiding in the perception of light, in right mindfulness, in right knowing, and in the perception of rising, and so lying down skillfully; and at the last-watch portion of the night, awakening swiftly, walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, purifying one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances.

As for "constantly and diligently cultivating the yoga of wakefulness," it is like this: suppose there is a certain disciple of the World-Honored One who, having heard the teaching of the yoga of wakefulness, wishes and delights to train in it, and so, relying on this yoga of wakefulness, forms this thought: "I shall accomplish the yoga of wakefulness that the Buddha has permitted." He gives rise to aspiration and delight, to energy and diligent toil, to surpassing valor, the arousing of strength, boldness, firm resolve, an unconquerable spirit, and the spurring on of his mind, without interval and in unbroken succession 〔cultivating unceasingly〕.

Walking to and Fro · Sitting in Quietude · The Five Hindrances · The Factors That Go Along with the Hindrances

Now within this, how does one "during the daytime portion walk to and fro and sit in quietude, purifying one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances"? What is called "daytime" is this: from the time the sun rises to the time the sun sets. What is called "walking to and fro" is this: on a stretch of ground broad and long, of a measure suited to the purpose, the bodily act of going and coming as is fitting 〔pacing back and forth〕. What is called "sitting in quietude" is this: suppose there is a certain one who, whether on a large bed, or on a small rope-cot, or on a seat of grass and leaves, sits cross-legged, holds the body erect and the aspiration upright, and settles into the mindfulness that turns the back 〔the mind turning its back on birth-and-death and heading toward nirvāṇa〕.

What is called the "hindrances" is this: the five kinds of covering. As for the "factors that go along with the hindrances," they are the factors that are able to draw on the hindrances and that fall in with the hindrances. What are the five hindrances? They are the hindrance of sensual craving, the hindrance of ill-will, the hindrance of dullness-and-drowsiness, the hindrance of restlessness-and-remorse, and the hindrance of doubt. What are the factors that go along with the hindrances? They are: the sign of the lovely and fine 〔which goes along with craving〕; the sign of ill-will 〔which goes along with ill-will〕; the sign of darkness 〔which goes along with dullness-and-drowsiness〕; the thought-currents concerning relatives, concerning the country, and concerning not-dying 〔which go along with restlessness〕; the recollection of times past — of laughter, play, joy, delight, and being waited upon 〔which goes along with remorse〕; and the improper thinking about the three times, or about anything within the three times 〔which goes along with doubt〕.

Question: When walking to and fro, from how many kinds of hindering factors does one purify one's mind? And how does one purify it of them? Answer: One purifies one's mind of the hindrance of dullness-and-drowsiness and of the hindering factors that are able to draw on dullness-and-drowsiness. In order to remove it, one applies oneself to the perception of light with skill and earnest care, taking it up well, thinking it well, understanding it well, and penetrating it well, with a mind accompanied by clarity and a mind accompanied by light; and whether in a sheltered place or in an open place, one walks to and fro. While walking to and fro, following along with some one agreeable and fine object, one displays it most excellently, encouraging, exhorting, and consoling one's mind — whether by recollecting the Buddha, or recollecting the Dharma, or recollecting the Saṅgha, or recollecting moral discipline, or recollecting generosity, or recollecting the gods; or, within the true Dharma that sets forth what accords with the perils of dullness-and-drowsiness, by censuring and decrying the faults of dullness-and-drowsiness through countless approaches, and by extolling and praising the merit of the everlasting cutting-off of dullness-and-drowsiness through countless approaches (namely, the discourses in prose, the verse-summaries, the prophetic expositions, the metrical hymns, the utterances spoken unasked, the accounts of occasions, the parables, the narratives of past events, the birth-stories, the extensive teachings, the accounts of marvels, and the discussions 〔the twelvefold division of the teaching〕); and, within this true Dharma, hearing and upholding it, reading and reciting it aloud in a great voice, expounding it to others, pondering its meaning, and weighing and examining it; or observing the directions and their quarters, or gazing at the courses and degrees of the stars, the moon, and the constellations 〔the movements of the heavenly bodies〕, or splashing cold water on one's face and eyes. By these means the enwrapping hindrance of dullness-and-drowsiness, being not yet arisen, does not arise, and, having arisen, is removed. By such skillful means one purifies one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances.

Question: When sitting in quietude, from how many kinds of hindering factors does one purify one's mind? And how does one purify it of them? Answer: One purifies one's mind of four kinds of hindering factors — namely, sensual craving, ill-will, restlessness-and-remorse, and the hindrance of doubt, together with the factors that are able to draw on them. In order to swiftly remove the enwrapping hindrance of sensual craving that has already arisen, and to keep at the utmost distance that which has not yet arisen, one sits cross-legged, holds the body erect and the aspiration upright, and settles into the mindfulness that turns the back: contemplating the discolored blue corpse, or the festering-and-rotting, or the decomposing, or the bloated, or the devoured, or the blood-smeared, or its bones, or its linked bones, or the chain of bones 〔the nine aspects of the contemplation of the unlovely〕; or bringing to mind and pondering some one worthy and good sign of concentration; or, within the true Dharma that sets forth what accords with the perils of sensual craving, censuring and decrying, through countless approaches, the faults of the craving for sense-desire, the love of sense-desire, the hoarding of sense-desire, the guarding of sense-desire, and the clinging to sense-desire, and extolling and praising, through countless approaches, the merit of the everlasting cutting-off of all sensual craving (the discourses in prose, the verse-summaries, the prophetic expositions, and so on at length); and, within this true Dharma, hearing and upholding it, becoming well-versed in it in speech, well-reflecting on it in mind, and well-penetrating it in view, and, in this very Dharma, thus sitting in quietude and reflecting in accordance with principle. By these means the enwrapping hindrance of sensual craving, being not yet arisen, does not arise, and, having arisen, is removed. By such skillful means one purifies one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances.

Where the case of the hindrance of ill-will differs — it is this: thus sitting in quietude, with a mind accompanied by loving-kindness, free of enmity, free of adversary, free of harm, free of vexation, vast and immeasurable, one cultivates it most excellently; toward one direction one arouses conviction and abides fully endowed with it, and so too the second, the third, and the fourth, spreading above, below, and to the sides, and toward all the boundless world-systems one arouses conviction and abides fully endowed with it 〔the immeasurable of loving-kindness〕. The rest is as stated before.

Where the case of the hindrance of restlessness-and-remorse differs — it is this: thus sitting in quietude, one makes the mind abide inwardly, accomplishes single-pointedness, and attains concentration. The rest is as stated before.

Where the case of the hindrance of doubt differs — it is this: thus sitting in quietude, one does not fail to reflect improperly upon the past, the future, and the present: "Did I exist in the past, or did I not exist? What was I in the past? How did I exist? What shall I be in the future? How shall I exist? What do I have in the present? How do I come to be? Whence has this sentient being come? And when it perishes from here, where will it go?" Such reflecting that does not accord with right principle one should properly keep at a distance; and reflecting in accordance with principle upon the past, future, and present, one "sees only that there are factors, sees only that there are events; knows the existent as existent and the non-existent as non-existent; observes only that there are causes and only that there are fruits; toward what is truly a non-event neither adds nor increases, and toward what is truly an event neither disparages nor slanders; and toward what truly exists understands it as truly existent" — that is, within all factors that are impermanent, suffering, empty, and without self, one understands the impermanent, the suffering, the empty, and the without-self. Being able thus to reflect in accordance with principle, one then has no confusion and no doubt about the Buddha; and about the Dharma, about the Saṅgha, about suffering, about its origin, about its cessation, about the path, about causes, and about the factors produced from causes, one has no confusion and no doubt. The rest is as stated before.

Again, concerning the hindrance of ill-will, one should speak thus: in order to cut off ill-will and the sign of ill-will, one hears and upholds this true Dharma, and so on at length. Concerning the hindrance of restlessness-and-remorse, one should speak thus: in order to cut off restlessness-and-remorse and the factors that fall in with them, one hears and upholds this true Dharma, and so on at length. Concerning the hindrance of doubt, one should speak thus: in order to cut off the hindrance of doubt and the factors that fall in with it, one hears and upholds this true Dharma, and so on at length. By such skillful means, from sensual craving, ill-will, dullness-and-drowsiness, restlessness-and-remorse, the hindrance of doubt, and the factors that fall in with them, one purifies one's mind. This is why it is said, "walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, one purifies one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances."

By the Governance of the Dharma · by the Governance of Oneself · by the Governance of the World

Thus has it been stated how, "by the governance of the Dharma," one purifies one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances. There is also purifying one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances "by the governance of oneself" and "by the governance of the world."

What is called purifying by the governance of oneself? It is like this: suppose there is a certain one for whom, among the hindrances, some one kind arises, and he himself knows that "this is not a wholesome factor," and does not firmly cling to the hindrance that has arisen, but swiftly casts it off, drives it out, and spits it up; and he is also able himself to observe that this hindrance that has arisen is deeply worthy of shame, defiling and vexing the mind and making wisdom feeble — that it belongs to the class of the harmful. This is called purifying one's mind by the governance of oneself.

What is called purifying by the governance of the world? It is like this: suppose there is a certain one for whom, among the hindrances, some one has already arisen, or is about to arise, and he then forms this thought: "If I give rise to a hindrance not yet arisen, I shall be censured by the Great Teacher, and shall also be lightly esteemed, in accordance with the Dharma, by the gods and by wise fellow-practitioners of the holy life." By this governance of the world, he is able to keep hindrances not yet arisen from arising, and is able swiftly to cast off hindrances that have arisen. This is called purifying one's mind by the governance of the world.

Lying Down on the Right Side · The Manner of the Lion-King's Lying Down

Further, in order to safeguard the bedding and to accord with worldly propriety, one spends the first portion of the night walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, purifying one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances; and when the mind has been purified, one goes outside the dwelling-place and washes both feet, and having washed the feet, one returns into the dwelling-place and lies down to sleep in accordance with the Dharma — so that the lying down may nourish and increase the great elements; and having gained this increase, the body is benefited and increased, becomes more possessed of strength, and becomes more capable of falling in with the wholesome, applied exertion that is unbroken and constantly attentive.

Question: For what reason does one lie down on the right side? Answer: Because it resembles the manner of the lion-king's lying down. Question: In what respect does it resemble it? Answer: Just as the lion-king, among all the beasts, is bold, firm, and fierce, and foremost of all; so too the monk, in constantly cultivating the yoga of wakefulness, rouses diligent energy and is bold, firm, and fierce, and foremost of all — for this reason it resembles the manner of the lion-king's lying down, and is unlike the lying down of ghosts, the lying down of the gods, or the lying down of those who indulge in sense-desires (for those are all slothful and lax, of low energy and feeble strength). Moreover, the principle rightly ought to be so: just as the lion-king lies down on its right side, so when one lies down in this manner "the body is without agitation and disorder, mindfulness is without lapse and loss, sleep is not overly heavy, and one does not see bad dreams"; whereas one who lies down otherwise than this is the opposite of this, and should be known to possess every one of these faults. This is why it is said, "lying down on the right side, with the feet stacked one upon the other."

The Four Skillful Ways of Lying Down (the Perception of Light · Right Mindfulness · Right Knowing · the Perception of Rising)

What is called "abiding in the perception of light and lying down skillfully"? It is this: with skill and earnest care as to the perception of light — taking it up well, thinking it well, understanding it well, and penetrating it well — one ponders the mind accompanied by the light of the gods, and lies down skillfully; and by this cause, even though one lies down, the mind is not dulled and darkened. This is called abiding in the perception of light and lying down skillfully.

What is called "right mindfulness and lying down skillfully"? It is this: if there are factors that one has already heard, already reflected on, and already cultivated to maturity, whose intrinsic nature is wholesome and which are able to draw on benefit and welfare, then by right mindfulness they keep operating, even as far as into sleep and dreams; by right mindfulness one keeps remembering them even within sleep and dreams, making the marks of those factors appear clearly and vividly present, so that toward those factors the mind mostly follows and contemplates; and by right mindfulness, following upon what one is mindful of, one sleeps either with a wholesome mind or with an indeterminate mind. This is called right mindfulness and lying down skillfully.

What is called "right knowing and lying down skillfully"? It is this: when, by right mindfulness, one lies down to sleep, if some one affliction becomes present and defiles and vexes the mind, then when this affliction arises one is able to rightly become aware of it, to keep from firmly clinging to it, and swiftly to cast it off, and having thoroughly penetrated it, one makes the mind turn back. This is called right knowing and lying down skillfully.

What is called "the perception of rising and lying down skillfully"? It is this: with energy one spurs on the mind and only then lies down to sleep; while lying down to sleep, from time to time one awakens, like a deer in the wild 〔alert and wary〕, and one should not in every respect let the mind run loose, falling in with, heading toward, and drawing near to sinking into sleep. And one forms this thought: "I should now accomplish, in full and complete measure, the whole of the yoga of wakefulness that the Buddhas have permitted; and in order to accomplish it, I should abide in the most extremely thick and intense aspiration and delight of applied exertion." And one forms this thought: "In order now to cultivate the yoga of wakefulness, I should rightly rouse and abide in diligent energy; and in order to cultivate the various wholesome factors, I should rightly stir up diligence, be free of all sloth, and be fully endowed with rousing; and as this portion of the night passes into the bright dawn, I should redouble the rousing of diligent energy in which I abide, and be fully endowed with rousing." Herein it should be known: by the first perception of rising, there is no heavy sleep, and at the time one ought to rise one is able to rise swiftly and never awakens only after the time has passed; by the second perception of rising, one is able, in the lion-king's lying down that the Buddhas together have permitted, to lie down in accordance with the Dharma, with neither excess nor deficiency; by the third perception of rising, one makes the wholesome aspiration and delight always without slackening or lapse, so that even if there is a lapse of mindfulness, one is able, again and again in succession, to take it up and train, so that there be no breaking-off. This is called the perception of rising and lying down skillfully.

Swiftly Awakening in the Last Watch · The Condensed Meaning (the Four Right Things to Be Done)

What is called "at the last-watch portion of the night, awakening swiftly, walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, purifying one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances"? The "last portion of the night" is, of the four divisions of the night, the division after the last one has passed. Having thus abided in the perception of light, in right mindfulness, in right knowing, and in the perception of rising, and lain down skillfully, he sleeps duly in the middle portion of the night (the division after one of the four divisions of the night has passed), so that at the time of rising the body is capable and rises in due time, and is not overpowered by the enwrapping of the highest grade of dullness-and-drowsiness (which, at the time about to rise, makes one dull, feeble, slothful, and lax); and because he is without this dullness, feebleness, sloth, and laxity, a single momentary act of attention suffices, without any difficulty, and he is able to rise swiftly. As for purifying the mind of the various hindering factors, it should be understood as before. Thus has been extensively expounded "constantly and diligently cultivating the yoga of wakefulness through the first and last watches of the night."

And how is the condensed meaning of this to be known? It is this: the person who constantly and diligently cultivates the yoga of wakefulness has, in brief, four kinds of right things to be done. Which four? First, as long as one is awake 〔while awake〕, always not forsaking the wholesome factors one is cultivating, and, within the cultivation of wholesome factors that is unbroken and constantly attentive, being boldly energetic; second, lying down at the proper time and not at an improper time; third, sleeping with a mind that is undefiled, not with a defiled mind; fourth, awakening at the proper time, rising not past the time. These are called the four right things to be done.

In accordance with these four right things to be done, the Buddhas, the World-Honored Ones, proclaim to the assembly of śrāvakas the cultivation of the yoga of wakefulness. How is it proclaimed? "During the daytime portion, walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, one purifies one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances; during the first-watch portion of the night, walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, one purifies one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances" — by this is proclaimed the first right thing to be done (as long as one is awake, always not forsaking the wholesome factors, being boldly energetic); "going outside the dwelling-place and washing the feet, then returning into the dwelling-place, lying down on the right side, with the feet stacked one upon the other" — by this is proclaimed the second right thing to be done (lying down at the proper time and not at an improper time); "abiding in the perception of light, in right mindfulness, in right knowing, and in the perception of rising, and lying down skillfully" — by this is proclaimed the third right thing to be done (sleeping with an undefiled mind); "at the last-watch portion of the night, awakening swiftly, walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, purifying one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances" — by this is proclaimed the fourth right thing to be done (awakening at the proper time, rising not past the time).

What is here stated — "abiding in the perception of light, in right mindfulness, in right knowing, and in the perception of rising, and lying down skillfully" — reveals that it is by two conditions that one "sleeps with an undefiled mind," namely by right mindfulness and by right knowing; and again that it is by two conditions that one "awakens at the proper time, rising not past the time," namely by abiding in the perception of light and by the perception of rising. How is this? By right mindfulness, one gathers oneself in upon a wholesome object and lies down; by right knowing, if upon the wholesome object the mind falls away and the various afflictions arise, one is then able swiftly and rightly to understand it — this is called, by two conditions, sleeping with an undefiled mind. By abiding in the perception of light and the perception of rising, there is no heavy sleep and the enwrapping of sleep cannot pursue one from afar — this is called, by two conditions, awakening at the proper time, rising not past the time. Thus proclaimed is the condensed meaning of the yoga of wakefulness; and this, together with the extensive expounding and explanation of the meaning stated before, is altogether named "constantly and diligently cultivating the yoga of wakefulness through the first and last watches of the night."

The Eighth Doorway · Dwelling with Right Knowing

What is called dwelling with right knowing? It is like this: suppose there is a certain one who — whether going or returning — dwells with right knowing; whether glancing or gazing, dwells with right knowing; whether bending or stretching, dwells with right knowing; in carrying the outer robe together with the [under-]robes and the alms-bowl, dwells with right knowing; whether eating, drinking, chewing, or tasting, dwells with right knowing; whether walking, standing, sitting, or lying down, dwells with right knowing; at the time of wakefulness, dwells with right knowing; whether speaking or keeping silent, dwells with right knowing; and at the time of relieving fatigue-sleep, dwells with right knowing.

Whether Going · Whether Returning

As for "whether going or returning, dwelling with right knowing" — what is going? What is returning? And how does one dwell with right knowing in going and returning? What is called "going" is this: going to a village, going among villages; going to households, going among households; going to a religious ground, going among religious grounds. What is called "returning" is this: returning from a village, returning among villages; returning from households, returning among households; returning from a religious ground, returning among religious grounds. What is called "dwelling with right knowing in going and returning" is this: as to one's own going, rightly knowing "I am going"; and as to one's own returning, rightly knowing "I am returning"; being able rightly to understand what one ought to go to and what one ought not to go to, and being able rightly to understand what one ought to return to and what one ought not to return to; being able rightly to understand the time one ought to go and the time not to go, and being able rightly to understand the time one ought to return and the time not to return; being able rightly to understand, in this way and that, what one ought and ought not to go to, and being able rightly to understand, in this way and that, what one ought and ought not to return to — this is called right knowing. Because he has accomplished this right knowing, he knowingly goes and knowingly returns; he goes to what ought to be gone to, not to what ought not to be gone to, and returns to what ought to be returned to, not to what ought not to be returned to; he goes and returns at the proper time, and not at an improper time; and in keeping with the rules of movement and stillness, the etiquette, and the deportment proper to his kind and station, whatever he ought to go to and ought to return to, thus he goes and thus he returns. This is called, whether going or returning, dwelling with right knowing.

Whether Glancing · Whether Gazing

As for "whether glancing or gazing, dwelling with right knowing" — what is glancing? What is gazing? How does one dwell with right knowing while glancing and gazing? what is called "glancing" is this: in the matters listed above, whether going or returning, with no prior awareness, no prior effort, and no prior wish, in the midst of them the eye sees the manifold forms 〔an inadvertent glimpse〕 — this is called glancing. What is called "gazing" is this: in the matters listed above, whether going or returning, with awareness beforehand, effort beforehand, and wish beforehand, the eye sees the manifold forms 〔a deliberate looking〕 — namely, kings, or those of the rank of kings, or their officials, or the common people, or brahmins, or householders, or wealthy elders and caravan-leaders; or other external things, houses, dwellings, halls, corridors, and shrines; or other manifold and various fine things of the world; contemplating and seeing such things, this is called gazing. If, as to the particular marks of this glancing and gazing, one is able rightly to understand them, and is able rightly to understand what one ought to glance at and what one ought to gaze at, and the time one ought to glance and the time one ought to gaze, and as one ought to glance and as one ought to gaze — this is called right knowing. Because he has accomplished this right knowing, he knowingly glances and knowingly gazes; he glances at what ought to be glanced at and gazes at what ought to be gazed at; at the proper times for glancing and gazing, he rightly glances and gazes; and in the manner in which he ought to glance and gaze, he thus glances and thus gazes. This is called, whether glancing or gazing, dwelling with right knowing.

Whether Bending · Whether Stretching

As for "whether bending or stretching, dwelling with right knowing" — what is bending? What is stretching? How does one dwell with right knowing while bending and stretching? it is this: as he thus glances and gazes, with going beforehand or returning beforehand, he either bends or stretches a foot, or bends or stretches an arm, or bends or stretches a hand, or bends or stretches some one limb or joint — this is called bending and stretching. If, as to the particular marks of bending and stretching, one is able rightly to understand them, and as to what is bent and stretched, the time of bending and stretching, and bending thus and stretching thus, one is able rightly to understand them — this is called right knowing. Because he has accomplished this right knowing, in bending and stretching he knowingly bends and knowingly stretches; he rightly bends and stretches what ought to be bent and stretched; at the proper times for bending and stretching, he rightly bends and stretches; and in the manner in which he ought to bend and stretch, he thus bends and thus stretches. This is called, whether bending or stretching, dwelling with right knowing.

Carrying the Outer Robe together with the Robes and the Alms-Bowl

As for "carrying the outer robe together with the [under-]robes and the alms-bowl, dwelling with right knowing" — what is carrying the outer robe? What is carrying the other robes? What is carrying the alms-bowl? How does one dwell with right knowing while carrying the outer robe, the other robes, and the alms-bowl? the "outer robe" means the large robe, whether of sixty strips, or of nine strips and the like, or stitched in two layers — this is named the outer robe; wearing it and putting it to use, being able rightly to look after it, is called carrying. If there is a middle robe, or a lower robe, or one carried as a robe, or a spare robe, or one that ought to be made allowable, or one already made allowable — all such are called robes; wearing them and putting them to use, being able rightly to look after them, is called carrying. Whatever begging-bowl fit to be received and kept, whether of iron or of clay, is called the alms-bowl; presently putting it to use, being able rightly to look after it, is called carrying. If, as to the particular marks of this outer robe, robes, and alms-bowl, one is able rightly to understand them, and is able rightly to understand what ought to be carried, and whether it is allowable or not allowable, and is able rightly to understand that at this time what has been carried ought to be carried, and is able rightly to understand that it ought to be carried in such a way — this is called right knowing. Because he has accomplished this right knowing, he knowingly carries the outer robe, the other robes, and the alms-bowl that ought to be carried; he carries what ought to be carried, and carries it rightly at the proper time; and in the manner in which it ought to be carried, he thus carries it. This is called, carrying the outer robe together with the [under-]robes and the alms-bowl, dwelling with right knowing.

Whether Eating · Drinking · Chewing · Tasting

As for "whether eating, drinking, chewing, or tasting, dwelling with right knowing" — what is eating? What is drinking? What is chewing? What is tasting? How does one dwell with right knowing while eating, drinking, chewing, and tasting? all food and drink that are put to use are altogether named food; and this is again of two kinds: first, chewing; second, tasting. What is chewing? It is chewing cakes, parched flour, or rice, or gruel, or broth, or thick soup, or anything else prepared and transformed that may be chewed and eaten, and that is able to sustain life; all such kinds are named chewing, and are also named food. What is tasting? It is tasting milk, curds, fresh butter, clarified butter, oil, honey, sugar, fish, meat, vinegar 〔sour condiment〕, or pickled fish 〔salt-cured fish〕, or fresh fruits, or the various kinds of things to be masticated; all such are altogether named tasting, and are also named food. What is drinking? It is sugar-water, or rock-sugar water, or rice-gruel drink, or churned-curd drink, or vinegar as drink, or beaten-curd drink, and so on down to water; these are altogether named drinking. If, as to the particular marks of this eating, drinking, chewing, and tasting, one is able rightly to understand them, and is able rightly to understand all that is eaten, drunk, chewed, and tasted, and is able rightly to understand that at that time one ought to eat, drink, chew, and taste, and is able rightly to understand that in such a way one ought to eat, and so on down to ought to taste — this is called right knowing. Because he has accomplished this right knowing, with respect to his own eating, drinking, chewing, and tasting, he knowingly eats, knowingly drinks, knowingly chews, and knowingly tastes; what ought to be eaten, drunk, chewed, and tasted, he rightly eats, rightly drinks, rightly chews, and rightly tastes; at the proper times for eating, drinking, chewing, and tasting, he eats, drinks, chews, and tastes at the proper time; and in the manner in which he ought to eat, and so on down to taste, he thus eats, and so on down to thus tastes. This is called, whether eating, drinking, chewing, or tasting, dwelling with right knowing.

Whether Walking · Standing · Sitting · Lying · Wakefulness · Speaking · Silence · Relieving Fatigue-Sleep

As for "whether walking or standing, and so on at length down to relieving fatigue-sleep, dwelling with right knowing" — what is walking? What is standing? What is sitting? What is lying? What is wakefulness? What is speaking? What is silence? What is relieving fatigue-sleep? And how does one dwell with right knowing in walking, standing, sitting, lying, wakefulness, speaking, silence, and relieving fatigue-sleep?

"Walking" — it is going to and fro upon the walking-place, or going to where fellow-practitioners in the Dharma are, or traveling along the road; such kinds are named walking. "Standing" — it is standing upon the walking-place, and standing before fellow-practitioners in the Dharma — the ācārya 〔the teacher of conduct-rules〕, the upādhyāya 〔the preceptor〕, and the elders and those equal to elders; such kinds are named standing. "Sitting" — it is, whether on a large bed, a small rope-cot, a seat of grass and leaves, various spreads, or a sitting-cloth 〔the sitting-mat〕, sitting cross-legged, holding the body erect and the aspiration upright, and settling into the mindfulness that turns the back; such kinds are named sitting. "Lying" — it is going outside the dwelling-place and washing both feet, then returning into the dwelling-place, and, whether on a large bed, a small rope-cot, a seat of grass and leaves, or in a forest-hermitage, or beneath a tree, or in an empty and quiet room, lying down on the right side with the feet stacked one upon the other; such kinds are named lying. "Wakefulness" — it is, during the daytime portion, walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, purifying one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances, and, during the first-watch and last-watch portions of the night, walking to and fro and sitting in quietude, purifying one's mind of the factors that go along with the hindrances; this is named wakefulness. "Speaking" — it is, constantly and diligently cultivating this wakefulness, bringing to completion the right receiving and right practicing of the Dharma not yet received (the discourses in prose, the verse-summaries, the prophetic expositions, and so on at length as before), and, as to the Dharma already received, becoming well-versed in it in speech (reading and reciting it aloud in a great voice, or extensively expounding and revealing it to others), and, from time to time, with wise fellow-practitioners of the holy life, or with other worthy and good laypeople, engaging in talk and discussion and mutual consolation (in order to exhort and encourage, and to seek the necessaries of life); such kinds are named speaking. "Silence" — it is, having become well-versed in speech in accordance with what was previously heard and previously practiced, and having brought the various teachings to completion, dwelling alone in an empty and quiet place, pondering their meaning, and weighing and examining them; or, in a quiet room, making the mind abide inwardly, abide evenly, abide settled, abide close, and be tamed, calmed, most extremely calmed, single-pointed, and evenly held 〔the nine ways of settling the mind〕; or, in insight 〔vipaśyanā, contemplation〕, cultivating the practice of yoga; such kinds are named silence. "Relieving fatigue-sleep" — it is, in the extremely hot and blazing time of the hot season, being either oppressed by the heat or wearied by toil and so growing tired, dully drowsing at an improper time and delighting in and clinging to sleep; this is named fatigue-sleep. If, as to the particular marks of walking and so on down to relieving fatigue-sleep, one is able rightly to understand them; if one rightly understands what walking and so on down to relieving fatigue-sleep ought to be done; if one rightly understands the proper time for walking and so on down to relieving fatigue-sleep; and if one rightly understands the manner in which walking and so on down to relieving fatigue-sleep ought to be done — this is called right knowing. Because he has accomplished this right knowing, in his own walking and so on down to relieving fatigue-sleep he walks with right knowing and so on down to relieves fatigue-sleep with right knowing; whatever walking and so on down to relieving fatigue-sleep ought to be done, he does that walking and so on down to that relieving of fatigue-sleep; at the proper time for walking and so on down to relieving fatigue-sleep, he then walks and so on down to relieves fatigue-sleep; and in the manner in which he ought to walk and so on down to relieve fatigue-sleep, he thus walks and so on down to thus relieves fatigue-sleep. This is called, in walking, standing, sitting, lying, wakefulness, speaking, silence, and relieving fatigue-sleep, dwelling with right knowing.

The Sequence of Dwelling with Right Knowing (Going to the Donor's House · What Ought and Ought Not to Be Observed · Deportment)

Furthermore, this dwelling with right knowing — what is its sequence? And to reveal what matter is it set forth? It is like this: suppose there is a certain one who, relying on and dwelling in a village, settlement, or hamlet of such a kind, forms this thought: "I should now go to such a village, settlement, or hamlet to make the rounds and beg for alms; and having thus begged, I should go out and return to my own place."

Again, among these villages and the like, there are certain households I ought not to go to. Which ones? They are the household of a public crier, or a wine-selling household, or a courtesan's household, or a royal household, or the household of a caṇḍāla or a butcher; or a household that is wholly given to slander and cannot be turned around. There are certain households I ought to go to — namely, the household of a great kṣatriya clan, or of a great brahmin clan, or of great householder clans, or an official's household, or a wealthy household, or an elder's household, or a caravan-leader's household. There are again households that, though I ought to go to them, I ought not to go to too early or too late; and if the donor's household has urgent business at the time, I ought not to go; and at a time of play and amusement, or when there is the business of construction and adornment, or when they are engaged in the world's foul and defiling affairs, or at a time of angry quarreling, I likewise ought not to go.

Again, just as one goes, so one ought to go: not going together with a violent and vicious elephant, not going together with violent throngs of carts, vicious horses, vicious oxen, or vicious dogs; not entering into noisy crowds, not treading on thorns and brambles, not climbing over walls, not crossing over pits and ditches, not falling down mountainsides, not sinking into deep water, not stepping in filth. One should go to the donor's house after the "simile of the moon," fully endowed with conscience and shame, keeping far from arrogance and pride, cleansing body and mind, not seeking gain and offerings, not hankering after respect; just as one rejoices in the mind when one obtains gain and offerings for oneself, so one rejoices in the mind at the gain and offerings obtained by others; not exalting oneself, not slighting others, bearing a mind of compassion. And one should uphold one's mind in this way in going to the donor's house: "How could there be a home-leaver who goes to another's place set on their giving — not that they should fail to give 〔and so on at length〕 — and who requires it to be swift rather than slow?" And one forms this thought: "As I now go for a while to the donor's house, I should know the measure of the offerings I receive; and I ought not, for the sake of gain and offerings, to practice fraud and deceit, display signs meant to confuse and mislead, or use gain to seek gain." Having obtained gain and offerings, without defilement and without craving, one puts them to use without gluttony, greed, infatuation, firm clinging, or besotted attachment.

Again, whether one has already gone or is in the course of going, when one sees the manifold forms, of these manifold forms one part ought to be observed and one part ought not to be observed. As to the manifold forms that ought not to be observed, one should draw in the eye and well guard the sense-faculties; as to the manifold forms that ought to be observed, one should abide well in mindfulness and rightly contemplate them. What class of form ought not to be observed? It is the various kinds of music, laughter, and merriment, or the singing, dancing, music, and the like made in other games and amusements; and again, the surpassing charm of women, young and in the bloom of years, of lovely and fine form; or other manifold forms one might see that are able to spoil the holy life, able to obstruct the holy life, and able to make the various kinds of evil, unwholesome thought-currents operate — such classes of manifold form ought not to be looked upon. What class of form is to be observed? It is all the bodies of those aged, worn, and decrepit, gasping for breath; the bodies of the bent-over, leaning on a staff and trembling; or the bodies of the diseased, sick, and gravely ill — feet swollen, hands swollen, belly swollen, face swollen, skin sallow and yellowed, ulcers, scabies, mange, and leprosy, pressed hard by every kind of suffering, the body worn out and slumped, the body swollen and festering, the sense-faculties dull and darkened; or those who have died young, dead now one day, two days, and so on up to seven days, devoured by crows and magpies, starving dogs, owls and vultures, foxes, wolves, and jackals — every kind of fierce and vicious bird and beast; or those whose life has ended and who have been placed out on a high bed, with a canopy spread above, before and behind which a great crowd wails or weeps, sprinkling ashes, earth, and dust upon body and hair, giving rise to sorrow, giving rise to suffering, giving rise to grief, giving rise to resentment, giving rise to distress, giving rise to vexation — such classes of manifold form I ought to observe; observing these manifold forms is able to accord with the holy life, able to sustain the holy life, and able to make the various wholesome thought-currents operate.

One ought not to enter the donor's house shaking the body, shaking the arms, shaking the head, leaping about, holding hands, hands on the hips, or with shoulders hunched up; one ought not to sit down at once upon a seat not permitted, and ought not to sit without carefully inspecting the seat; one ought not to let all the parts of the body run loose, ought not to prop up the feet, ought not to cross the feet, ought not to draw the feet in too narrowly, ought not to spread the feet too widely, but should sit with dignified composure. One ought not, when wearing the Dharma-robe, to leave the fastening open, nor to raise it up, nor to spread it out, nor to hitch it up 〔pull it aside〕; the Dharma-robes one wears should all be even and neat, neither high nor low, not like an elephant's trunk, and not worn like the seed-cluster in the fronds of a palmyra tree, nor like a dragon's head, nor like a lump of beans. One ought not to hold the bowl in anticipation of getting its food, ought not to hold the bowl over the food and drink, ought not to set the bowl in a defiled place, a place of pits and gullies, or a place at the edge of a cliff. And one should partake of food and drink in order: one ought not to cover the broth or soup with rice, nor cover the rice with broth or soup, ought not to receive the food and drink greedily, ought not to receive the food and drink with resentment, ought not to eat too coarsely, nor eat too finely, ought not to eat in rounded lumps, ought not to lick the hand or lick the bowl, ought not to eat while shaking the hand or shaking the foot, and ought not to bite off pieces as one eats.

Returning home to the dwelling-place from the donor's house, one walks to and fro during the day and night portions upon one's own separately-apportioned walking-place 〔the portion allotted to oneself〕, and does not walk to and fro heedlessly upon another's place, upon a place not entrusted 〔a place not permitted〕, upon a place not freely granted, or upon a place not given; one does not practice walking to and fro at a time when one is overpowered by bodily toil, by bodily weariness, or by restlessness of mind; but in order to cultivate the wholesome factors and in order to think well, drawing the sense-faculties inward and keeping the mind from straying outward, one practices walking to and fro, not too swift and hurried, not too agitated, and not one-sidedly bent solely on going and coming, but practicing walking to and fro with steps taken from time to time and pauses made from time to time. Having thus walked to and fro upon one's own place of residence 〔one's own courtyard, one's own room, one's own separately-apportioned place, the place the Saṅgha has apportioned〕, one then, whether on a large bed, a small rope-cot, a seat of grass and leaves, or a sitting-cloth, or in a forest-hermitage, beneath a tree, in a charnel-ground, or in an empty and quiet room, sits cross-legged, holds the body erect and the aspiration upright, and settles into the mindfulness that turns the back, and so practices sitting in quietude.

In the middle portion of the night one rests in accordance with the Dharma, and during the daytime portion and the first-watch portion of the night one ought not to cultivate the various wholesome factors too urgently; when thus sleeping, one should, as stated before, abide in the perception of light, right mindfulness, right knowing, and the perception of rising; and in the last-watch portion of the night one awakens swiftly.

Whether in discussion and debate, or in reading and reciting, one diligently cultivates the applied practice; or, when for the sake of cultivating cutting-off one dwells at leisure in silent quietude and ponders the Dharma, one ought to keep far from the treatises that accord with the world — ornate letters, ornate phrases, and ornately embellished wording, which are able to draw on the meaningless and are not able to bring about the realization of the higher knowledges, of perfect awakening, or of ultimate nirvāṇa 〔such miscellaneous writings〕. And as to the true Dharma that the Tathāgata has spoken — most extremely profound, resembling the profound, and joined to emptiness, according with the nature of conditions and with the various dependent originations — one earnestly and unbrokenly takes it up well and receives it well, making it firm, making it abide, making it without loss or ruin, in order to accomplish right conduct and not for the sake of gain, offerings, respect, or fame; and as to this Dharma, one becomes well-versed in it in speech, and observes it well with wisdom; toward noisy crowds one does not delight to draw near, does not delight in much activity, and does not delight in much talk, and from time to time abides in right mindfulness; with wise fellow-practitioners of the holy life one engages in talk and discussion and mutual consolation, delighting to raise inquiries, delighting to seek out the various wholesome things, with a mind free of contention and dispute, one's words measured, in accord with reason, upright, and calm, delighting to expound the true Dharma diligently for others. And one ought also to keep silent quietude: as to the evil and unwholesome thought-currents, not delighting to think them; as to the factors that are contrary to principle, not delighting to reflect on them; as to what one has oneself realized, being free of overweening pride; among the small and low kinds of distinguished realization, not giving rise to complacent contentment; among the higher realizations, being without shrinking back; being well able to keep far from the places that ought not to be thought upon, from time to time cultivating the yoga of tranquillity and insight, delighting to cut off and delighting to cultivate, cultivating unbrokenly and cultivating earnestly.

And in the extremely hot and blazing time of the hot season, being boldly diligent and rousing energy, and doing some one thing that ought to be done, on account of toil and weariness one gives rise to dull drowsing at an improper time; for this reason one should rest for a while, wishing to make the dull drowsiness be swiftly removed, and not, by letting a long time pass, to diminish the wholesome factors or obstruct the wholesome factors; and when resting, one either shuts the door, or has a bhikṣu keep watch at one's side, or, by the concealed and proper rule of the Vinaya, covers the body with a robe and rests for a brief while in a deeply secluded place, making all the fatigue-sleep be entirely removed.

This is called the prior-and-subsequent sequence of dwelling with right knowing — namely, in reliance on the time of acting and in reliance on the time of dwelling. And as to the wholesome factors before one has yet entered upon them, the excellent wisdom that operates together with the mind's raising of applied practice and with attention in accordance with principle is called right knowing; and it is this very right knowing that, at the time of acting and at the time of dwelling, accomplishes everything without any deficiency. This is called dwelling with right knowing.

The Condensed Meaning of Dwelling with Right Knowing (Five Acts in the Time of Acting · Five Acts in the Time of Dwelling · Four Acts)

Herein it should be known: "whether going, returning, glancing, gazing, bending, stretching, carrying the outer robe together with the [under-]robes and the alms-bowl, eating, drinking, chewing, or tasting, dwelling with right knowing" — by this is named dwelling with right knowing "in the time of duly acting among the villages and the like"; "whether walking, standing, sitting, lying, cultivating wakefulness, speaking, keeping silent, or relieving fatigue-sleep, dwelling with right knowing" — by this is named dwelling with right knowing "in the time of duly dwelling in one's dwelling-place." Thus has dwelling with right knowing been extensively analyzed.

And how is the condensed meaning of this to be known? It is this: in the time of acting there are five kinds of act, in the time of dwelling there are five kinds of act, and dwelling with right knowing in the time of acting and the time of dwelling has four kinds of act — this is called the condensed meaning of dwelling with right knowing.

What are the five acts in the time of acting? First, bodily act; second, ocular act; third, the act of all the limbs and joints; fourth, the act concerning robes and bowl; fifth, the act concerning food and drink. "Whether going or returning" reveals the bodily act in the time of acting; "whether glancing or gazing" reveals the ocular act in the time of acting; "whether bending or stretching" reveals the act of all the limbs and joints in the time of acting; "carrying the outer robe together with the [under-]robes and the alms-bowl" reveals the act concerning robes and bowl in the time of acting; "whether eating, drinking, chewing, or tasting" reveals the act concerning food and drink in the time of acting.

What are the five acts in the time of dwelling? First, bodily act; second, verbal act; third, mental act; fourth, day-act; fifth, night-act. "Whether walking, standing, or sitting" reveals the bodily act in the time of dwelling; "whether speaking" reveals the verbal act in the time of dwelling; "whether lying, keeping silent, or relieving fatigue-sleep" reveals the mental act in the time of dwelling; "whether cultivating wakefulness" reveals the day-act, night-act, bodily act, and verbal act in the time of dwelling; and again, "whether lying" reveals the night-act in the time of dwelling. It should be known that these are called the five acts in the time of dwelling.

What are the four acts of dwelling with right knowing in the time of acting and the time of dwelling? It is this: at the outset, in reliance on that act of acting and act of dwelling, one gives rise to such an act, and toward that act one keeps guard over right mindfulness and abides without heedlessness — it should be known that this act is subsumed under right mindfulness and subsumed under non-heedlessness 〔the first and second acts〕; if, as to this matter, this place, and this time, in the measure, in accordance with principle, and according to its kind, there is something that ought to be done, then as to this matter, this place, and this time, in the measure, in accordance with principle, and according to its kind, one does it with right knowing 〔the third act〕; and because he thus acts with right knowing, in the present life he is without offense, without transgression, without wrongdoing, without alteration, and without regret, and in the world to come he is likewise without offense, and when the body breaks up and he dies he does not fall into the evil destinies, is not born into any of the hells, and, in order to obtain what has not yet been obtained, amasses and cultivates the provisions 〔the fourth act〕. This is called the condensed meaning of dwelling with right knowing. It has been extensively analyzed before; this condensed meaning now, all together, is named dwelling with right knowing.

聲聞地 · 初瑜伽處 · 出離地 · 善友性~沙門莊嚴The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · The First Yoga-Station · Deliverance · Good Friendship through the Adornments of the Ascetic

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

二道資糧十四門的最後六門:第九善友性、第十聞正法、第十一思正法、第十二無障礙、第十三修惠捨、第十四沙門莊嚴。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;嗢拕南壓縮處以〔〕補回所略。

〔本地分中聲聞地第十三初瑜伽處出離地第三之四〕

第九門·善友性

什麼名為善友性?就是由八種因緣,應知一切種圓滿的善友性。哪八種?就是譬如有一,安住禁戒、具足多聞、能有所證、性多哀愍、心無厭倦、善能堪忍、無有怖畏、語具圓滿。

什麼名為安住禁戒?就是安住具足戒、善能守護別解脫律儀(如前廣說),樂沙門性、樂婆羅門性,為自調伏、為自寂靜、為自涅槃而修行正行。如此名為安住禁戒。

什麼名為具足多聞?就是若有法宣說開示,「初、中、後善,文義巧妙,獨一、圓滿、清白、梵行」,於這樣眾多妙法能善受持,言善通利、意善尋思、見善通達。如此名為具足多聞。

什麼名為能有所證?就是能證得「勝無常想、無常苦想、苦無我想、厭逆食想、一切世間不可樂想、有過患想、斷想、離想、滅想、死想、不淨想、青瘀想、膿爛想、破壞想、膖脹想、噉食想、血塗想、離散想、骨鎖想、觀察空想」〔諸想〕;又能證得初靜慮、第二、第三、第四靜慮,空無邊處、識無邊處、無所有處、非想非非想處〔四無色〕;又能證得慈悲喜捨〔四無量〕,或預流果、一來果、不還果,或神境通、宿住通、天耳通、死生通、心差別通,或阿羅漢;具八解脫、靜慮等定,有大堪能、具大勢力,能善為他現「三神變」教授教誡。三神變者,一、神力神變,二、記說神變,三、教導神變。如此名為能有所證。

什麼名為為性哀愍?就是於他人常起悲憐,樂與其義、樂與其利、樂與其樂、樂與猗觸〔身心安適〕、樂與安隱。如此名為為性哀愍。

什麼名為心無厭倦?就是善能示現、教導、讚勵、慶慰,處於四眾宣說正法不辭勞倦,翹勤無墮、起發圓滿、為性好樂、發勤精進。如此名為心無厭倦。

什麼名為善能堪忍?就是「罵不報罵、瞋不報瞋、打不報打、弄不報弄」,堪耐椎杵;於諸逼迫、縛錄、禁閉、捶打、毀辱、迫愶、斫截等眾苦事中,自推己過、以業異熟為所依趣,終不於他發生憤恚,也不懷恨、隨眠不捨;如此雖遭輕陵毀辱而本性都無變改,唯常於彼思為義利。又能堪忍寒熱、飢渴、蚊虻、風日、蛇蠍惡觸,他所干犯、磣毒語言,及身內所生猛利堅勁辛楚切心奪命的苦受,為性堪忍、能有容納。如此名為善能堪忍。

什麼名為無有怖畏?就是處大眾說正法時,心無怯劣、聲無戰掉、辯無誤失,終不由怯懼因緣為諸怖畏所逼,腋不流汗、身毛不竪。如此名為無有怖畏。

什麼名為語具圓滿?就是成就最上首語、極美妙語、甚顯了語、易悟解語、樂欲聞語、無違逆語、無所依語、無邊際語。如此名為語具圓滿,言詞巧妙。

成就如此八種因緣,便善能諫舉、善作憶念、善能教授、善能教誡、善說正法。

「善能諫舉」——就是若有他人於增上戒毀犯尸羅、於增上軌毀犯軌則,由見、聞、疑而能正諫舉:真實不以虛妄、應時不以非時、饒益不以衰損、柔軟不以麁獷、善友〔之心〕不以憎嫉。如此名為善能諫舉。

「善作憶念」——就是令憶念先所犯的罪,或法、或義。〔令憶念罪:〕若有他人先起毀犯而不能憶,善作方便令彼憶念,告言:「長老!曾於某處、某事、某時,毀犯如是色類。」〔令憶念法:〕若有他人於先所聞所受的正法(契經應頌記別等)獨處思念而不能憶,令其憶念,或稱述授與令憶、或興請問詰難令憶。〔令憶念義:〕若有他人於先所聞所受的正義有所忘失,為作憶念、宣說開示,令新令顯;又若善能引義利、引梵行、久時所作所說的,彼若忘失也令憶念。如此名為善作憶念。

「善能教授」——就是於遠離、寂靜的瑜伽作意止觀,時時隨順教授而轉,時時宣說與彼相應的無倒言論——所謂能趣心離障蓋、甚可愛樂的尸羅言論、等持言論、聖慧言論、解脫言論、解脫智見言論;少欲言論、喜足言論;永斷言論、離欲言論、寂滅言論;損減言論、無雜言論、隨順緣性緣起言論。如此名為善能教授。

「善能教誡」——就是於大師所說的聖教,能以正法、以毘奈耶平等教誨;或軌範師、親教師、同法者、餘尊重等,如實知彼隨於一處違越毀犯,便時時如法呵責、治罰、驅擯,令其調伏;既調伏已,如法平等受諸利養,和同、曉悟、收斂、攝受;於所應作及不應作,為令現行、不現行,於積習及不積習,教導教誨。如此名為善能教誡。

「善說正法」——就是時時能善宣說「初時所作」的無倒言論,所謂施論、戒論、生天之論,於諸欲中能廣開示過患、出離、清淨品法;又時時宣說超勝的四種聖諦相應言論,所謂苦論、集論、滅論、道論。為令有情得成熟、得清淨、為令正法久住,宣說相應、助伴、隨順、清亮、有用、相稱、應順、合名句文身的言論;又此言論應時而發、殷重、漸次、相續、俱有,令其欣慶、愛樂、歡喜、勇悍,無所訶擯、相應助伴、無亂如法、稱順眾會;有慈憐心、利益心、哀愍心,不依利養恭敬讚頌,不自高舉、不陵蔑他。如此名為善說正法。

由他成就如此八支,於時時間善能諫舉、憶念、教授、教誡、說法,所以說彼名為善友。如此廣辨善友性已。

又怎樣知此中略義?就是善友心善稠密、為性哀愍,最初於彼樂為利益、樂為安樂〔一〕;又即於此利益安樂如實了知、無有顛倒、離顛倒見〔二〕;又即於此利益安樂有大勢力、方便善巧,能令積集、能令引發〔三〕;又即於此利益安樂翹勤無墮、起發圓滿、為性好樂、發勤精進〔四〕。當知由這四因緣,攝一切種總略圓滿的善知識性。如此名為善友性的略義。

第十門·聞正法

什麼名為聞思正法?所謂「正法」者,就是若佛世尊、若佛弟子、正士、正至、正善丈夫所宣說開顯分別照了的。這又是什麼?就是契經、應頌、記別……乃至論議〔十二分教〕,是名正法。

「契經」——就是薄伽梵〔佛〕於彼彼方所,為彼彼所化有情,依彼彼所化諸行差別,宣說無量的蘊相應語、處相應語、緣起相應語、食相應語、諦相應語、界相應語、聲聞乘相應語、獨覺乘相應語、如來乘相應語、念住正斷神足根力覺支道支等相應語、不淨息念諸學證淨等相應語;結集如來正法藏者攝聚這種種聖語,為令聖教久住,以諸美妙名句文身如其所應次第安布、次第結集,貫穿縫綴種種能引義利、能引梵行的真善妙義。是名契經。

「應頌」——就是於中間或最後宣說伽他,或宣說未了義經。是名應頌。「記別」——就是於是中記別弟子命過已後當生等事,或宣說已了義經。是名記別。「諷頌」——就是非直說,是結句說(或二句、三句、四句、五句、六句等)。是名諷頌。「自說」——就是於是中不顯能請者的名字種姓,為令正法久住而不請自說。是名自說。「因緣」——就是於是中顯示能請者的名字種姓、因請而說,及諸毘奈耶相應、有因有緣的別解脫經。是名因緣。「譬喻」——就是於是中有譬喻說,由譬喻故本義明淨。是名譬喻。「本事」——就是諸宿世相應的事義言教。是名本事。「本生」——就是於是中宣說世尊在過去世彼彼方分若死若生、行菩薩行、行難行行。是名本生。「方廣」——就是於是中廣說一切諸菩薩道,為令修證無上正等菩提、十力、無畏、無障智等一切功德。是名方廣。「希法」——就是於是中宣說諸佛、佛弟子、比丘比丘尼、式叉摩那、勞策男女〔沙彌沙彌尼〕、近事男女〔優婆塞優婆夷〕等,若共不共、勝於其餘、勝諸世間、同意所許的甚奇希有最勝功德。是名希法。「論議」——就是一切摩呾履迦〔本母〕、阿毘達磨,研究甚深的素呾纜〔經〕義,宣暢一切契經宗要。是名論議。

如此十二分教,為三藏所攝:契經、應頌、記別、諷頌、自說、譬喻、本事、本生、方廣、希法,是名素怛纜藏〔經藏〕;因緣,是名毘奈耶藏〔律藏〕;論議,是名阿毘達磨藏〔論藏〕。所以這十二分教為三藏所攝。如此一切,正士、正至、正善丈夫共所宣說,故名正法。聽聞此故,名聞正法。這又是什麼?就是譬如有一,或受持素怛纜藏,或受持毘奈耶藏,或受持阿毘達磨藏;或兼持素怛纜藏與毘奈耶藏,或兼持素怛纜藏與阿毘達磨藏,或兼持毘奈耶藏與阿毘達磨藏,或三藏全部受持。如此一切名聞正法。這聞正法又有二種:一、聞其文,二、聞其義。

第十一門·思正法

什麼名為思正法?就是譬如有一,即依所聞所信的正法,獨處空閑,遠離六種不應思處——就是思議我、思議有情、思議世間、思議有情業果異熟、思議靜慮者的靜慮境界、思議諸佛諸佛境界〔此六非凡思所及,思之徒亂〕;而只正思惟所有諸法的「自相、共相」。

這樣思惟又有二種:一、以「算數行相」善巧方便地算計諸法;二、以「稱量行相」依正道理觀察諸法的功德過失。無論思惟與諸蘊相應的所有言教,或思惟前面所說其餘任何一類言教,都要由這算數、稱量兩種行相,以善巧方便加以思惟。

怎樣以「算數行相」思惟蘊相應的言教?就是:所言「色」者,即十色處及墮法處所攝的眾色,是名色蘊;所言「受」者,即三種受,是名受蘊;所言「想」者,即六想身,是名想蘊;所言「行」者,即六思身等,是名行蘊;所言「識」者,即六識身等,是名識蘊。如此名為以算數行相思惟蘊相應言教;或由此算數行相別別思惟、展轉差別,當知即有無量差別。

怎樣以「稱量行相」依正道理思惟蘊相應言教?就是依「四道理」無倒觀察。哪四種?一、觀待道理,二、作用道理,三、證成道理,四、法爾道理。

什麼名為「觀待道理」?略說有兩種觀待:第一是生起觀待,就是諸蘊由諸因、諸緣的勢力而生起,諸蘊的生起必須觀待那些因緣;第二是施設觀待,就是由名身、句身、文身施設諸蘊,諸蘊的施設必須觀待名句文身。這就是諸蘊的生起觀待與施設觀待。即此生起觀待、施設觀待而生起諸蘊、施設諸蘊,說名「道理瑜伽方便」,所以說為觀待道理。

「作用道理」——就是諸蘊生已,由自緣故有自作用、各各差別:眼能見色、耳能聞聲、鼻能嗅香、舌能甞味、身能覺觸、意能了法;色是眼根的境界、眼根的所行,乃至法是意根的境界、意根的所行。其餘同類諸法在各別境界中所有的各別作用,也都應依此理解。即此諸法各別作用所有的道理瑜伽方便,皆名作用道理。

「證成道理」——就是「一切蘊皆是無常,眾緣所生,苦、空、無我」,由三量如實觀察:由至教量〔聖言量〕、由現量、由比量。由此三量證驗道理,諸有智者心正執受、安置、成立「一切蘊皆無常性、眾緣生性、苦性、空性、無我性」。如此等名證成道理。

「法爾道理」——就是:何因緣故彼諸蘊如是種類、諸器世間如是安布?何因緣故地堅為相、水濕為相、火煖為相、風以輕動為相?何因緣故諸蘊無常、諸法無我、涅槃寂靜?何因緣故色變壞相、受領納相、想等了相、行造作相、識了別相?由彼諸法「本性應爾、自性應爾、法性應爾」,即此法爾名「道理瑜伽方便」;或即如是、或異如是、或非如是,一切皆以法爾為依、皆歸法爾道理,令心安住、令心曉了。如此名為法爾道理。

如此名為依四道理觀察蘊相應言教。如由算數行相及稱量行相觀察蘊相應言教,如此即由二種行相觀察其餘所有言教。如此總名審正觀察、思惟一切所說正法。如此名為聞思正法。

第十二門·無障礙

什麼名為無障?就是這無障略有二種:一、依內,二、依外。我當先說「依內障、依外障」,與彼相違的,當知即是二種無障。

什麼名為「依內障」?就是譬如有一,於先世不曾修福;不修福故,不能時時獲得隨順的資生眾具(衣、食、坐臥具、病緣醫藥及餘什物);有猛利貪及長時貪、猛利瞋及長時瞋、猛利癡及長時癡;或於先世積集造作多疾病業,由彼為因多諸疾病;或由現在行不平等,由是風熱痰癊數數發動,或有宿食住在身中;或食麁重,多事、多業、多有所作、多與眾會,樂著事業、語言、睡眠、諠眾、相雜住、戲論,樂自舉恃、掉亂、放逸、居止非處。如此等類,應知一切名依內障。

什麼名為「依外障」?就是譬如有一,依止不善士,由彼因緣不能時時獲得隨順的教授教誡;或居惡處,於此住處若晝日分多有種種諠雜眾集諸變異事、若於夜分多有種種高聲大聲大眾諠雜,又有種種猛利辛楚的風日惡觸,或有種種人及非人的怖畏驚恐。如此等類,應知一切名依外障。如此廣辨內外障已。

又怎樣知此中略義?就是此中略有三障:一、加行障,二、遠離障,三、寂靜障。

「加行障」——就是若此障現前,於諸善品所有加行皆無堪能、亦無勢力。這又是什麼?就是常疹疾、困苦、重病,風熱痰癊數數發動,或宿食住身中,或被蛇蠍百足蚰蜒所螫,或人非人逼惱,又不能得衣食臥具醫藥及餘什物。如此種種,應知一切都名為加行障。

什麼名為「遠離障」?第一,所食麁重;第二,多事、多業、多有所作,或者愛樂事業,由此愛樂種種事業、其心於彼彼事中流散。第三,愛樂語言,雖於遠離斷寂靜修有所堪能、有大勢力,然唯讀誦便生喜足。第四,愛樂睡眠,惛沈睡眠常所纏繞、為性懈怠,執睡、執倚、執臥為樂。第五,愛樂諠鬧群眾,樂與在家出家眾談說王論、賊論、食論、飲論、妙衣服論、婬女巷論、諸國土論、大人傳論、世間傳論、大海傳論等能引無義的虛綺論,抂度時日。第六,經常愛樂與大眾聚會,彼彼事中令心散動擾亂。第七,愛樂與眾雜住,在家出家眾未會則思慕欲見、已會則不欲別離。第八,愛樂戲論,樂著世間種種戲論,於應趣向處好樂前行、於遠離中喜捨善軛。如此種種眾多障法,應知一切都名為遠離障。若此障現前,難捨阿練若、山林曠野的貪著,也不能居阿練若、塚間、樹下、空閑靜室。

「寂靜障」——就是「寂靜」即奢摩他〔止〕、毘鉢舍那〔觀〕;有奢摩他障、有毘鉢舍那障。

「奢摩他障」——就是諸放逸及住非處:由放逸故或惛沈睡眠纏心、或唯得奢摩他便生愛味、或於下劣性心樂趣入、或於闇昧性其心樂著;由住如是非處,人或非人諠雜擾亂、他所逼惱、心外馳散。如此名為奢摩他障;應知這一障礙正能障蔽寂靜。

「毘鉢舍那障」——就是樂自恃舉及以掉亂。「樂自恃舉」者:譬如有一作這樣的思——「我生高族、淨信出家,非為下劣,諸餘比丘則不如是」,由此自高自舉、陵蔑於他;同樣,他又想:「我生在富族,以淨信出家,並不貧乏;我具足妙色,令人喜見而端嚴;我多聞、能持所聞,積集了眾多聞法;我善巧言詞,語具圓滿;其餘比丘卻不如此。」,由此自高自舉、陵蔑於他;他由自高舉故,於耆年多智、積修梵行的比丘不能時時恭敬請問,那些比丘也不時時為他開發未開發處、顯了未顯了處,也不為他殷懇以慧通達甚深句義方便開示、乃至令其智見清淨——如此名樂自恃舉的毘鉢舍那障。又如有一,唯得少分下劣的智見便安隱而住,由此自高舉、便生喜足、更不上求,是名樂自恃舉所住的毘鉢舍那障。「掉亂」者:譬如有一,根不寂靜、諸根掉亂囂舉,於一切時惡思所思、惡說所說、惡作所作,不能安住、不能堅固思惟諸法,由此毘鉢舍那不能圓滿、不得清淨,是名掉亂的毘鉢舍那障。如此二法障奢摩他(多放逸及住非處),二法障毘鉢舍那(樂自恃舉及以掉亂)。

如此若奢摩他障、若毘鉢舍那障,總名寂靜障。如此名為障的略義。即此略義及前廣辨總略為一,說名為障。此障相違,當知無障——就是這障的無性、遠離、不合、不會,說名無障。

第十三門·修惠捨

什麼名為惠捨?就是若布施其性無罪,為莊嚴心、為助伴心、為資瑜伽、為得上義而修布施,是名惠捨。

問:誰能施?誰所施?用何施?何相施?云何施?何故施?——由這因緣,施性無罪。

〔誰能施〕答:「能施」者,謂施者、施主。怎樣施者?怎樣施主?若自手施名為施者;若自物施、若欣樂施非不樂施,名為施主。

〔誰所施〕「所施」者有四種所施對象:一、有苦者,二、有恩者,三、親愛者,四、尊勝者。什麼是「有苦者」?就是貧窮者、乞匃者、行路者、悕求者、盲瞽者、聾騃者、無依者、無趣者、匱乏種種資生具者,以及其餘同類;這些名為有苦者。什麼是「有恩者」?就是父母、哺乳者、養育者、令其成長者;或在曠野沙磧中能救度者,飢饉時能賑恤者,畏懼怨敵時能救援者,被人執縛時能解救者,遭受疾病時能救療者;以及教人利益、教人安樂、引發利益、引發安樂者,在所生種種事務中作助伴者,同其歡喜者、同其憂愁者,遭遇厄難時不相棄者,以及其餘同類;這些名為有恩者。什麼是「親愛者」?就是諸親友,對他有愛、有敬,信順其語,時常與他語言談論、交往,或彼此親昵,以及其餘同類;這些名為親愛者。什麼是「尊勝者」?就是沙門或婆羅門,為世間共同認許的賢善者、遠離損害乃至極離損害者、離貪欲者、為調伏貪而修行者、離瞋恚者、為調伏瞋而修行者、離愚癡者、為調伏癡而修行者,以及其餘同類;這些名為尊勝者。

〔用何施〕「用何施」者,略說或用有情數物、或用無情數物而行惠施。什麼是以「有情數物」行惠施?就是或妻子、奴婢、作使,或象馬猪牛羊雞鴨駝騾等,或諸餘大男大女小男小女,或復內身頭目手足血肉骨髓隨願施與(這是諸菩薩所現行事,非此義中意所許施);若施者對那些有情確實具有支配權、有勢力並能制伏,而且應當把他惠施給他人;惠施時施者自己沒有罪過;不因這一惠施令他人心生嫌恨;並且明知那位有情不會因此受到損惱,這才名為無罪的有情數物惠施。什麼是以「無情數物」行惠施?略說有三種物:第一是財物(末尼、真珠、琉璃、螺貝、璧玉、珊瑚、馬瑙、彩石、生色〔金〕可染〔銀〕、赤珠、右旋〔螺貝右旋·吉祥之相;此字底本作「右旋」,宋元明本作「布施」、聖本作「右施」,三讀並錄〕,或諸珍寶、金銀、衣服、什物、香、鬘);這些以及其餘同類名為財物。第二是穀物(可食可飲的大麥、小麥、稻穀、粟穀、糜黍、胡麻、大小豆,甘蔗、蒲桃、乳酪、果汁、種種漿飲);這些以及其餘同類名為穀物。第三是處物(諸田宅、邸店、鄽肆,建立福舍及寺館等);這些以及其餘同類名為處物。這就名為無罪的無情數物惠施。所有有情數物與無情數物,合起來總名為所用來布施的物。

〔何相施〕「施相」者,謂無貪俱行的思造作心意業,及此所起的身業語業,捨所施物(或捨自相續、或捨他相續)。是名施相。

〔云何施〕怎樣布施?就是由淨信而行惠施,由正確的教法見而行惠施,由信見業果而行惠施,由極其殷重的心而行惠施;以恭敬心親手布施而不輕慢;在適當時候施與,濟助他人的迫切需要,不因施與損惱他人;依法平等,不以兇暴手段積集的財物布施;用鮮潔物、精妙物、清淨物布施,使自己與他人都沒有罪過;又數數惠施以制伏慳垢,積集布施的勢力;施前心生歡喜,正施時其心清淨,施後心無追悔。這就是所說的「如是而施」。

〔何故施〕「何故施」者——或慈悲故而施(於有苦者)、或知恩故而施(於有恩者)、或愛敬信順故而施(於親愛者)、或為悕求世出世間殊勝功德而施(於尊勝者)。由是因緣修惠施;由是行相,或在家、或出家修行布施,為莊嚴心、為助伴心、為資瑜伽、為得上義而行布施。由此施性無罪,是名惠捨。

第十四門·沙門莊嚴

什麼名為沙門莊嚴?攝頌〔嗢拕南〕說:

〔頌〕正信、無諂、少病、精進、慧;具少欲、喜足、易養、及易滿;杜多德、端嚴、知量、善士法;具聰慧者相、忍、柔和、賢善。

就是譬如有一,具足正信、無有諂曲、少諸疾病、性勤精進、成就妙慧、少欲、喜足、易養、易滿、具足成就杜多功德、端嚴、知量、具足成就賢善士法、具足成就聰慧者相、堪忍、柔和、為性賢善。

什麼名為「具足正信」?多淨信、多正敬順、多生勝解、多善欲樂,於諸善法及大師所深生淨信、無惑無疑,於大師所恭敬尊重承奉供養,專心親附、依止而住。如同對大師一樣,他對正法、同梵行者、所學的教授教誡、修習供養、無放逸與三摩地,也都深生淨信,恭敬尊重,專心親附,依止而住。如此名為具足正信。

什麼名為「無有諂曲」?有純質、為性正直,於大師及諸有智同梵行所如實自顯〔不藏覆〕。如此名為無有諂曲。

什麼名為「少諸疾病」?性無病、順時變熟、平等執受、不極溫熱、不極寒冷、無所損害、隨時安樂,由是所食所飲所噉所甞易正變熟〔消化〕。如此名為少諸疾病。

什麼名為「性勤精進」?能安住有勢、有勤、有勇、堅猛,於善法中能不捨軛〔不卸擔〕,翹勤無惰、起發圓滿、能有所作,於諸有智同梵行者躬自承奉。如此名為性勤精進。

什麼名為「成就妙慧」?聰、念、覺皆悉圓滿,根不闇鈍、不頑愚、不瘖瘂、非手代言,有力能了善說惡說的法義,不但具足成就與生俱來的覺慧,也具足成就由修習所生的加行覺慧。如此名為成就妙慧。

什麼名為「少欲」?雖成就善的少欲等功德,而不欲求他人知道「我具足少欲、成就功德」。如此名為少欲。

什麼名為「喜足」?於隨一衣服飲食臥具等便生歡喜、生正知足;於未得的衣服或麁或妙更無悕望思慮,於已得的不染不愛而受用之;如同衣服一樣,對飲食、臥具等事,也都對未得者不再悕望思慮,對已得者不染不愛而受用。如此名為喜足。

什麼名為「易養」?能獨一自得怡養、不待於他(或僮僕、或餘人眾),又不追求餘長財寶、令施主等謂為難養。如此名為易養。

什麼名為「易滿」?得微少便自支持,若得麁弊亦自支持。如此名為易滿。

「成就杜多功德」——就是常期乞食、次第乞食、但一坐食、先止後食、但持三衣、但持毳衣、持糞掃衣、住阿練若、常居樹下、常居逈露、常住塚間、常期端坐、處如常坐〔頭陀諸行〕;依止若食若衣若諸敷具的杜多功德,或十二種、或十三種。於乞食中分二:一、隨得乞食(隨往還家、隨獲隨得而受食),二、次第乞食(入里巷巡家而乞、隨得隨現而受食,不高舉手越趣餘家而願得精妙、乃至期願多得)。當知此中:若依乞食無差別性唯有十二,若依乞食有差別性〔分隨得/次第〕便有十三。

什麼名為「但一坐食」?就是坐一座,乃至應食悉皆受食,從此座起以後必不再次進食。如此名為但一坐食。什麼名為「先止後食」?就是為食故坐如應座,未食前先具受諸所應食,正了知「我今唯受爾所飲食、當自支持」「我過於此定不當食」,如此受取完畢,然後才開始進食。如此名為先止後食。什麼名為「但持三衣」?就是但三衣而自支持;何者三衣?一、僧伽胝〔大衣〕,二、嗢怛囉僧伽〔上衣,七條〕,三、安怛婆參〔下衣,五條〕;除此三衣以外,終不貯藏超過所需的長衣。如此名為但持三衣。什麼名為「但持毳衣」?就是所持衣(或三衣、或長衣)一切皆用毛毳而作,終不貯藏用其他材料製作的衣服。如此名為但持毳衣。什麼名為「持糞掃衣」?就是所有衣是他人捨棄擲於街巷市鄽道非道、或雜便穢膿血洟唾所塗染者,取如是不淨衣物除去麁穢、堅執洗浣、將它縫補、染色而後受持。如此名為持糞掃衣。什麼名為「住阿練若」?就是住空閑山林坰野,受用邊際臥具,遠離一切村邑聚落。如此名為住阿練若。什麼名為「常居樹下」?就是恒常立願住在樹下、依止樹根。如此名為常居樹下。什麼名為「常居逈露」?就是恒常立願住在空曠裸露、沒有遮蔽之處。如此名為常居逈露。什麼名為「常住塚間」?就是恒常立願住在塚墓之間,也就是人死後送置尸骸的地方。如此名為常住塚間。什麼名為「常期端坐」?就是於大床小繩床草葉座端身而坐、推度時日,從不以背部或脇部依靠大床、小繩床、牆壁、樹木或草葉座。如此名為常期端坐。什麼名為「處如常座」?就是所坐臥的草座葉座,如舊敷設而常坐臥,敷設一次以後,終不反覆翻動、舉起或修整。如此名為處如常座。

問:何故名為「杜多功德」?答:譬如世間或毛或㲲〔細毛布〕,未鞭、未彈、未紛、未擘時相著、不軟不輕,不堪造作縷綫氈褥;若鞭、若彈、若紛、若擘,則分散柔軟輕妙,堪任造作縷綫氈褥。修行者由飲食貪而對飲食心生染著,由衣服貪而對衣服心生染著,由敷具貪而對敷具心生染著;彼由這杜多功德能淨修治,令其純直、柔軟輕妙、有所堪任、隨順依止、能修梵行——所以名為杜多功德。其中的對治關係如下:飲食中有美食貪與多食貪兩種,能障礙修善;為斷美食貪故常期乞食、次第乞食,為斷多食貪故但一坐食、先止後食;衣服中有多衣貪、軟觸貪、上妙貪三種,能障礙修善;為斷多衣貪故但持三衣,為斷軟觸貪故但持毳衣,為斷上妙貪故持糞掃衣;敷具中有諠雜貪、屋宇貪、倚樂臥樂貪、敷具貪四種,能障礙修善;為斷諠雜貪故住阿練若,為斷屋宇貪故常居樹下、逈露、塚間(又為斷婬佚貪故常住塚間),為斷倚樂臥樂貪故常期端坐,為斷敷具貪故處如常座。是名成就杜多功德。

什麼名為「端嚴」?能成就若往若還、若覩若瞻、若屈若伸、持僧伽胝持衣持鉢的端嚴形相。如此名為端嚴。

什麼名為「知量」?於淨信的婆羅門、長者、居士極恣供養的衣服飲食敷具醫藥諸什物中,知量而聚〔不貪多〕。如此名為知量。

什麼名為「成就賢善士法」?或生高族、或生富族而淨信出家,顏容殊妙、喜見端嚴、具足多聞、語具圓滿,或隨獲得少智少見少安樂住,由此不自高舉、不陵蔑他,能知「唯有法隨法行是其諦實」,了知以後,便精進修習法隨法行。如此名為成就賢善士法。

什麼名為「成就聰慧者相」?由作業的相狀表知誰是愚夫,也由作業的相狀表知誰是聰慧者。具體說,諸愚夫惡思所思、惡說所說、惡作所作;諸聰慧者善思所思、善說所說、善作所作。如此名為成就聰慧者相。

什麼名為「堪忍」?罵不報罵、瞋不報瞋、打不報打、弄不報弄,又能忍受寒熱飢渴蚊虻風日蛇蠍毒觸、他所干犯麁惡語言,及身中猛利堅勁辛楚切心奪命的苦受,對這些都能以堪忍為性,有所容受。如此名為堪忍。

什麼名為「柔和」?於大師等具足成就慈愍的身業、語業、意業,與諸有智同梵行者和同受用所應受用,凡所飲食無有私密,如法所獲所得墮在鉢中、為鉢所攝而受用;同戒、同見,成就如此六種可樂可愛可重、無違諍的法,易可共住、性不惱他,與有智慧的同梵行者共住一處時,恒常令彼此歡喜〔即六和敬〕。如此名為柔和。

什麼名為「賢善」?遠離顰蹙、舒顏平視、含笑先言、常為愛語,性多攝受善法同侶、身心澄淨。如此名為賢善。

若有成就如此諸法,愛樂正法、愛樂功德,不樂利養恭敬稱譽;也不成就增益、損減二種邪見——於非有法未甞增益、於實有法未甞損減;於世間文綺者所造的順世種種綺飾文句詩論,能正了知無義無利而遠避棄捨、不習不愛、不流傳;不樂貯畜餘長衣鉢;遠離與在家共諠雜住(增煩惱故),樂與聖眾和合居止(淨修智故);不樂攝受親里朋友(唯恐由此親友因緣招無量擾亂事務,彼或變壞當生種種愁慼傷歎悲苦憂惱);隨所生起的本惑隨惑不堅執著、尋即棄捨除遣變吐(唯恐由此二惑因緣當生現法後法眾苦);終不虛損所有信施、終不毀犯清淨禁戒而受用信施、終不毀呰他人信施、終不棄捨所受學處;常樂省察己之過失、不喜伺求他所愆犯,隱覆自善、發露己惡;命難因緣亦不故思毀犯眾罪,設由忘念少有所犯即便速疾如法悔除;於應作事翹勤無墮、凡百所為自能成辦、終不求他為己給使;於佛世尊及佛弟子不可思議的威德神力、甚深法教深生信解、終不毀謗,能正了知「唯是如來所知所見、非我境界」;終不樂住自己妄見取、非理僻執、惡見所生的言論呪術。

若與如此功德相應,如此安住、如此修學,以正沙門諸莊嚴具而自莊嚴,甚為微妙。譬如有人,盛壯端正、好自莊嚴、樂受諸欲,沐浴身首、塗以妙香、服鮮白衣,飾以種種妙莊嚴具——所謂瓔珞、耳環、指環、腕釧、臂釧、諸妙寶印,并金銀等種種華鬘——這樣莊嚴極為奇妙。如此行者,以正沙門的種種功德妙莊嚴具而自莊嚴,其德熾然、威光遍照,所以說為沙門莊嚴。這就是沙門莊嚴具的義。

The last six of the fourteen gates of the provisions for the two paths: the ninth, good friendship; the tenth, hearing the true Dharma; the eleventh, reflecting on the true Dharma; the twelfth, freedom from obstruction; the thirteenth, cultivating generous giving; the fourteenth, the adornments of the ascetic (śramaṇa). Technical terms are kept as of old, and rendered clause by clause into present-day language, without adding doctrinal exposition, without citing treatises, without annotating Sanskrit; where the summary verse (uddāna) has compressed the matter, what it abridged is restored within 〔 〕.

〔The Śrāvaka Stage, the thirteenth, within the Basic Section; the First Yoga-Station; Deliverance, the third, part four〕

The Ninth Gate · Good Friendship

What is called good friendship? It is that, through eight causal factors, one should understand good friendship as complete in every mode. Which eight? Suppose there is one who abides in the moral discipline, is furnished with much learning, is able to attain realization, is by nature much given to compassion, is untiring in mind, is well able to endure, is without fear, and whose speech is complete.

What is called abiding in the moral discipline? It is to abide furnished with the discipline, well able to guard the code of individual liberation (the prātimokṣa, as explained at length before), to delight in the state of the ascetic and to delight in the state of the brahmin, and to practice right conduct for one's own taming, for one's own quiescence, for one's own nirvāṇa. This is called abiding in the moral discipline.

What is called being furnished with much learning? It is that, when there is a Dharma proclaimed and disclosed — "good in the beginning, good in the middle, good in the end; excellent in its words and its meaning; unique, complete, pure, the holy life" — one is able to receive and retain well these many wondrous Dharmas of that kind, penetrating them well in word, examining them well in thought, and understanding them well in insight. This is called being furnished with much learning.

What is called being able to attain realization? It is being able to attain the surpassing perception of impermanence, the perception of impermanence-as-suffering, the perception of suffering-as-not-self, the perception of the loathsomeness of food, the perception that nothing in all the world is to be delighted in, the perception of danger, the perception of cutting off, the perception of separation, the perception of cessation, the perception of death, the perception of the impure, the perception of the livid corpse, the perception of the festering corpse, the perception of the decomposing corpse, the perception of the bloated corpse, the perception of the devoured corpse, the perception of the blood-smeared corpse, the perception of the scattered corpse, the perception of the chained skeleton, and the perception that contemplates emptiness 〔these perceptions〕; and further, being able to attain the first meditative absorption, the second, the third, and the fourth absorption, the sphere of boundless space, the sphere of boundless consciousness, the sphere of nothing-at-all, and the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception 〔the four formless attainments〕; and further, being able to attain loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity 〔the four immeasurables〕, or the fruit of stream-entry, the fruit of once-returning, the fruit of non-returning, or the supernormal power over the sphere of objects, the power of recollecting former abodes, the divine ear, the power over death-and-rebirth, and the power of discerning others' minds, or arhatship; being furnished with the eight liberations, the meditative absorptions and such concentrations, having great capability and great power, being well able to display for others the "three miraculous transformations" as instruction and admonition. The three miraculous transformations are: first, the miraculous transformation of spiritual power; second, the miraculous transformation of declaration; third, the miraculous transformation of guiding instruction. This is called being able to attain realization.

What is called being by nature compassionate? It is that toward others one constantly gives rise to pity, delighting to give them what is of benefit, delighting to give them advantage, delighting to give them happiness, delighting to give them ease of body and mind 〔bodily and mental comfort〕, and delighting to give them security. This is called being by nature compassionate.

What is called being untiring in mind? It is that one is well able to demonstrate, to guide, to encourage, and to console; that among the fourfold assembly one proclaims the true Dharma without shrinking from toil and weariness, diligent and undeclining, complete in the arousing of effort, by nature glad to do so, and rousing energetic effort. This is called being untiring in mind.

What is called being well able to endure? It is that "one does not return abuse for abuse, does not return anger for anger, does not return a blow for a blow, does not return mockery for mockery," and can bear the mallet and pestle; that amid all the sufferings of oppression, binding and detention, imprisonment, beating, humiliation, coercion, and cutting, one lays the fault on oneself, takes the maturation of karma as the ground to which one resorts, and in the end gives rise to no rancor toward others, harbors no hatred, and does not fail to relinquish the latent proclivity; so that, though one meets with slight and humiliation in this way, one's fundamental nature undergoes no change at all, and one only ever thinks of what is of benefit for that person. And one is able also to endure cold and heat, hunger and thirst, mosquitoes and gadflies, wind and sun, the vile touch of snakes and scorpions, the encroachments of others and their bitter, stinging speech, and the sufferings arising within the body that are sharp, hard, acrid, cutting to the heart, and life-robbing — being by nature enduring and able to take them in. This is called being well able to endure.

What is called being without fear? It is that, when in a great assembly one expounds the true Dharma, the mind is without timidity, the voice is without trembling, and the eloquence is without error; that in the end one is not pressed by any fears through the causes of fright and dread; the armpits do not run with sweat and the body's hair does not stand on end. This is called being without fear.

What is called being complete in speech? It is that one accomplishes speech that is foremost, speech that is most beautiful and wondrous, speech that is very clear, speech easy to understand, speech that others wish to hear, speech without contrariety, speech unattached to anything, and speech without limit. This is called being complete in speech, with words that are skillful and wondrous.

Accomplishing these eight causal factors, one becomes well able to remonstrate and reprove, to prompt remembrance well, to teach well, to admonish well, and to expound the true Dharma well.

"Being well able to remonstrate and reprove" — it is that, if some other person has breached the moral precepts with respect to the higher discipline, or breached the rules with respect to the higher deportment, then, on the ground of what one has seen, heard, or suspected, one is able to remonstrate and reprove rightly: truthfully, not falsely; at the proper time, not the improper time; for their benefit, not their harm; gently, not roughly; as a good friend 〔in heart〕, not out of resentment and envy. This is called being well able to remonstrate and reprove.

"Prompting remembrance well" — it is to make one remember an offense formerly committed, or a Dharma, or a meaning. 〔To make one remember an offense:〕 if some other person has formerly committed a breach but cannot remember it, one skillfully devises a means to make them remember, saying: "Elder! At such a place, in such a matter, at such a time, you committed a breach of such-and-such a kind." 〔To make one remember a Dharma:〕 if some other person, pondering alone the true Dharma formerly heard and received (the discourses, verses in accord, predictions, and so on), cannot remember it, one makes them remember, either by reciting and imparting it to prompt remembrance, or by raising questions and challenges to prompt remembrance. 〔To make one remember a meaning:〕 if some other person has forgotten and lost the true meaning formerly heard and received, one prompts remembrance for them, proclaiming and disclosing it, making it fresh and making it clear; and further, if what was well able to draw forth benefit and to draw forth the holy life, done long ago and said long ago, has been forgotten by that person, one likewise prompts their remembrance. This is called prompting remembrance well.

"Teaching well" — it is that, with regard to the yogic attention of tranquillity and insight in seclusion and quiet, from time to time one instructs in accord with what is fitting, and from time to time proclaims the unerring discourse that corresponds to it — namely, the greatly delightful discourse able to lead the mind away from the hindrances and coverings: the discourse on moral discipline, the discourse on concentration, the discourse on holy wisdom, the discourse on liberation, and the discourse on the knowledge and vision of liberation; the discourse on having few wishes and the discourse on contentment; the discourse on eternal cutting off, the discourse on freedom from craving, and the discourse on quiescent cessation; the discourse on diminishing, the discourse without admixture, and the discourse on conformity to conditionality and dependent origination. This is called teaching well.

"Admonishing well" — it is that, with regard to the holy teaching spoken by the Great Master, one is able to instruct impartially by the true Dharma and by the discipline (the vinaya); or, when a preceptor of deportment, a personal preceptor, a fellow in the Dharma, or others worthy of reverence has, as one knows in accord with reality, transgressed and breached in any one respect, then from time to time one lawfully rebukes, penalizes, and expels them, so as to tame them; and once they are tamed, one lawfully and impartially receives the gains together with them, in harmony, enlightening, gathering in, and taking them in; and with regard to what should be done and what should not be done, so as to make it be practiced or not be practiced, and with regard to what should be habituated and what should not be habituated, one guides and instructs. This is called admonishing well.

"Expounding the true Dharma well" — it is that from time to time one is well able to proclaim the unerring discourse of "what is done at the outset," namely the discourse on giving, the discourse on discipline, and the discourse on rebirth in the heavens, and, with regard to the desires, is able to disclose at length the Dharma of their danger, the going-forth from them, and their purification; and from time to time one proclaims the surpassing discourse corresponding to the four holy truths, namely the discourse on suffering, the discourse on its origin, the discourse on its cessation, and the discourse on the path. So that sentient beings may attain maturation, may attain purification, and so that the true Dharma may long endure, one proclaims a discourse that corresponds, accompanies, accords, is clear, useful, fitting, and in accord — a discourse composed of names, phrases, and syllables; and this discourse is uttered at the proper time, earnest, gradual, continuous, and coherent, making them glad, delighted, joyful, and eager, with nothing to reprove, corresponding and accompanying, undisordered and lawful, in accord with the assembly; with a mind of loving pity, a mind of benefit, and a mind of compassion, not depending on gain, honor, and praise, not exalting oneself, and not disparaging others. This is called expounding the true Dharma well.

Because that person accomplishes these eight limbs and is well able, from time to time, to remonstrate and reprove, to prompt remembrance, to teach, to admonish, and to expound the Dharma, it is for this reason that they are called a good friend. Thus good friendship has been explained at length.

And how is the summary meaning here to be known? It is that the good friend is good and deeply devoted in mind, is by nature compassionate, and at the very first delights in doing what is of benefit for that person and delights in doing what brings happiness 〔one〕; and further, with regard to this very benefit and happiness, understands it in accord with reality, without distortion, free from distorted views 〔two〕; and further, with regard to this very benefit and happiness, has great power and skillful means, and is able to make it accumulate and able to make it draw forth 〔three〕; and further, with regard to this very benefit and happiness, is diligent and undeclining, complete in the arousing of effort, by nature glad, and rousing energetic effort 〔four〕. One should know that, through these four causal factors, the state of the spiritual friend is gathered up, complete in every mode, whole and in brief. This is called the summary meaning of good friendship.

The Tenth Gate · Hearing the True Dharma

What is called hearing and reflecting on the true Dharma? As to what is called "the true Dharma," it is that which is proclaimed, disclosed, distinguished, and illumined by the Blessed World-Honored One, by the Buddha's disciples, by the true, the rightly-arrived, and the truly good persons. And what is this? It is the discourses, the verses in accord, the predictions … and so on down to the doctrinal discussions 〔the twelvefold division of the teaching〕; these are called the true Dharma.

"The discourses" (sūtra) — it is that the Blessed One (bhagavat) 〔the Buddha〕, in this place and that, for the sentient beings to be trained here and there, in accordance with the differences of conduct of those to be trained, proclaimed measureless speech corresponding to the aggregates, speech corresponding to the sense-bases, speech corresponding to dependent origination, speech corresponding to nutriment, speech corresponding to the truths, speech corresponding to the elements, speech corresponding to the śrāvaka vehicle, speech corresponding to the pratyekabuddha vehicle, speech corresponding to the tathāgata vehicle, speech corresponding to the foundations of mindfulness, the right exertions, the bases of spiritual power, the faculties, the powers, the factors of awakening, the limbs of the path, and the like, and speech corresponding to the perception of impurity, the mindfulness of breathing, the trainings, and the assurances of purity; and those who compiled the treasury of the Tathāgata's true Dharma gathered together such manifold holy speech, so that the holy teaching might long endure, arranging it in order and compiling it in order by way of beautiful and wondrous names, phrases, and syllables in accord with what was fitting — that is, stringing and stitching together the various true, good, and wondrous meanings able to draw forth benefit and able to draw forth the holy life. These are called the discourses.

"The verses in accord" (geya) — it is that in the middle or at the end one proclaims stanzas (gāthā), or proclaims a discourse whose meaning is not yet drawn out. These are called the verses in accord. "The predictions" (vyākaraṇa) — it is that herein one predicts such matters as where the disciples will be reborn after their lives have passed, or one proclaims a discourse whose meaning is already drawn out. These are called the predictions. "The chants" (gāthā) — it is not the direct saying but the saying in verse-lines (whether two lines, three lines, four lines, five lines, six lines, and so on). These are called the chants. "The utterances" (udāna) — it is that herein the name and clan of the one who could request are not shown, and, so that the true Dharma may long endure, it is spoken without being requested. These are called the utterances. "The occasions" (nidāna) — it is that herein the name and clan of the one who could request are shown, and it is spoken because of a request, together with the discourses of individual liberation corresponding to the discipline, which have a cause and a condition. These are called the occasions. "The parables" (avadāna) — it is that herein there is speech by way of parable, and because of the parable the fundamental meaning becomes clear and pure. These are called the parables. "The past events" (itivṛttaka) — it is the teachings whose matters and meanings correspond to former lives. These are called the past events. "The birth stories" (jātaka) — it is that herein one proclaims how, in past lives in this place and that, the World-Honored One died and was born, practiced the bodhisattva's conduct, and practiced the difficult practices. These are called the birth stories. "The extensive expositions" (vaipulya) — it is that herein one expounds at length the whole path of the bodhisattvas, so that one may cultivate and realize unsurpassed perfect awakening, the ten powers, the fearlessnesses, unobstructed knowledge, and all such qualities. These are called the extensive expositions. "The marvels" (adbhutadharma) — it is that herein one proclaims the most wondrous, rare, and surpassing qualities — whether shared or unshared, surpassing all others, surpassing all the world, and approved by common consent — of the buddhas, the buddhas' disciples, monks and nuns, probationary nuns (śikṣamāṇā), male and female novices 〔the śrāmaṇera and śrāmaṇerī〕, and laymen and laywomen 〔the upāsaka and upāsikā〕, and so on. These are called the marvels. "The doctrinal discussions" (upadeśa) — it is all the matrices (mātṛkā) 〔the mothers-of-the-text〕 and the Abhidharma, which investigate the very deep meaning of the discourses (sūtra) 〔the scriptures〕 and expound the essentials of all the discourses. These are called the doctrinal discussions.

These twelvefold divisions of the teaching are subsumed under the three baskets: the discourses, the verses in accord, the predictions, the chants, the utterances, the parables, the past events, the birth stories, the extensive expositions, and the marvels are called the Sūtra Basket 〔the Basket of Discourses〕; the occasions are called the Vinaya Basket 〔the Basket of Discipline〕; the doctrinal discussions are called the Abhidharma Basket 〔the Basket of Treatises〕. Thus these twelvefold divisions of the teaching are subsumed under the three baskets. All this is proclaimed in common by the true, the rightly-arrived, and the truly good persons, and is therefore called the true Dharma. Because one listens to and hears this, it is called hearing the true Dharma. And what is this? It is that, suppose there is one who receives and retains the Sūtra Basket, the Vinaya Basket, or the Abhidharma Basket; who receives and retains together the Sūtra and Vinaya Baskets, the Sūtra and Abhidharma Baskets, or the Vinaya and Abhidharma Baskets; or who receives and retains all three, the Sūtra, Vinaya, and Abhidharma Baskets. All of this is called hearing the true Dharma. This hearing of the true Dharma is again of two kinds: first, hearing its words; second, hearing its meaning.

The Eleventh Gate · Reflecting on the True Dharma

What is called reflecting on the true Dharma? It is that, suppose there is one who, relying on the true Dharma heard and believed, dwells alone in a quiet, empty place, keeping away from the six kinds of matters that should not be pondered — namely, pondering the self, pondering sentient beings, pondering the world, pondering the karmic fruit and maturation of sentient beings, pondering the meditative range of those in absorption, and pondering the buddhas and the buddhas' range 〔these six are beyond the reach of ordinary pondering; to ponder them merely disorders the mind〕 — and only rightly contemplates the "particular mark and general mark" of all dharmas.

This contemplating is again of two kinds: first, reckoning up the dharmas by skillful means through the "mode of enumeration"; second, examining the qualities and faults of the dharmas in accord with right principle through the "mode of assessment." Whether one reflects on teachings associated with the aggregates or on any of the other teachings mentioned above, one reflects on all of them by the skillful means of these two modes: enumeration and assessment.

How does one contemplate the teaching corresponding to the aggregates through the "mode of enumeration"? It is thus: what is spoken of as "form" — that is, the ten form-bases and the forms subsumed under the dharma-base — is called the aggregate of form; what is spoken of as "feeling" — that is, the three kinds of feeling — is called the aggregate of feeling; what is spoken of as "perception" — that is, the sixfold body of perception — is called the aggregate of perception; what is spoken of as "formations" — that is, the sixfold body of volition and the rest — is called the aggregate of formations; what is spoken of as "consciousness" — that is, the sixfold body of consciousness and the rest — is called the aggregate of consciousness. This is called contemplating the teaching corresponding to the aggregates through the mode of enumeration; or, by this mode of enumeration, pondering them one by one in their successive differences, one should know that there are then measureless differences.

How does one contemplate the teaching corresponding to the aggregates in accord with right principle through the "mode of assessment"? It is examining without distortion in accord with the "four principles." Which four? First, the principle of dependence; second, the principle of function; third, the principle of establishment-by-proof; fourth, the principle of the way-things-are.

What is "the principle of dependence"? In brief there are two kinds of dependence: first, dependence for arising — the aggregates arise through the force of the various causes and conditions, and their arising must depend on those causes and conditions; second, dependence for designation — the aggregates are designated through the bodies of names, phrases, and syllables, and their designation must depend on those names, phrases, and syllables. These are the aggregates' dependence in arising and in designation. It is this very dependence for arising and dependence for designation, in the arising of the aggregates and the designating of the aggregates, that is called "the skillful means of the yoga of principle," and it is therefore spoken of as the principle of dependence.

"The principle of function" — it is that, once the aggregates have arisen, through their own conditions they have their own functions, each distinct: the eye is able to see form, the ear is able to hear sound, the nose is able to smell scent, the tongue is able to taste flavor, the body is able to feel the tangible, and the mind is able to cognize dharmas; form is the object of the eye and what the eye ranges over, and so on down to dharmas being the object of the mind and what the mind ranges over. The distinct functions of the other phenomena of this kind within their respective domains should likewise be understood. It is the principle — the skillful means of the yoga — that lies in these dharmas' each having its distinct function, all of which is called the principle of function.

"The principle of establishment-by-proof" — it is that "all the aggregates are impermanent, arisen from the assemblage of conditions, suffering, empty, and not-self," examined in accord with reality by way of the three means of valid knowledge: by way of the authoritative teaching 〔the means of holy words〕, by way of direct perception, and by way of inference. Verifying the principle by these three means of valid knowledge, those who have wisdom rightly grasp, settle, and establish in mind that "all the aggregates are impermanent in nature, arisen-from-the-assemblage-of-conditions in nature, suffering in nature, empty in nature, and not-self in nature." Such and the like is called the principle of establishment-by-proof.

"The principle of the way-things-are" — it is this: for what cause and condition are those aggregates of such a kind, and the receptacle-worlds arranged in such a way? For what cause and condition does earth have solidity for its mark, water wetness for its mark, fire warmth for its mark, and wind lightness-and-motion for its mark? For what cause and condition are the aggregates impermanent, the dharmas not-self, and nirvāṇa quiescent? For what cause and condition does form have the mark of deterioration, feeling the mark of experiencing, perception and the rest the mark of cognizing, formations the mark of fashioning, and consciousness the mark of discerning? Because those dharmas are "such by their fundamental nature, such by their own nature, such by their dharma-nature" — this very way-things-are is called "the skillful means of the yoga of principle"; and whether it be just so, or otherwise than so, or not so, all of it takes the way-things-are as its ground and all of it returns to the principle of the way-things-are, making the mind abide and making the mind clear. This is called the principle of the way-things-are.

This is called examining the teaching corresponding to the aggregates in accord with the four principles. As one examines the teaching corresponding to the aggregates through the mode of enumeration and the mode of assessment, so through these two modes one examines all the rest of the teaching. This whole is called scrutinizing rightly, examining, and contemplating all the true Dharma that has been spoken. This is called hearing and reflecting on the true Dharma.

The Twelfth Gate · Freedom from Obstruction

What is called freedom from obstruction? This freedom from obstruction is in brief of two kinds: first, that resting on the inner; second, that resting on the outer. I shall first speak of "obstruction resting on the inner and obstruction resting on the outer"; what is contrary to these, one should know, is precisely the two kinds of freedom from obstruction.

What is called "obstruction resting on the inner"? It is that, suppose there is one who has not cultivated merit in former lives; and because they have not cultivated merit, they cannot from time to time obtain the fitting requisites of life (clothing, food, seats and bedding, medicines for illness, and other utensils); who has sharp greed and long-standing greed, sharp anger and long-standing anger, sharp delusion and long-standing delusion; or who has amassed and wrought much disease-causing karma in former lives, and because of that has many diseases; or who, through present unbalanced conduct, has wind, heat, and phlegm again and again arising, or has undigested food remaining within the body; or who eats coarse and heavy fare, has many affairs, many undertakings, much to do, and much intercourse with crowds, being fond of business, of talk, of sleep, of noisy crowds, of dwelling mixed among others, and of idle proliferation, and being fond of self-exaltation, distraction, negligence, and dwelling in an improper place. Such and the like — one should know all of it is called obstruction resting on the inner.

What is called "obstruction resting on the outer"? It is that, suppose there is one who relies on an unvirtuous person, and through that cause cannot from time to time obtain fitting instruction and admonition; or who dwells in a bad place, where, in the daytime, there are many kinds of noisy, mixed crowds gathering and various disturbing events, and, in the night, many kinds of loud voices, great sounds, and the din of a great crowd, and again various kinds of sharp and bitter vile touches of wind and sun, or various kinds of frights and terrors from humans and non-humans. Such and the like — one should know all of it is called obstruction resting on the outer. Thus the inner and outer obstructions have been explained at length.

And how is the summary meaning here to be known? It is that herein there are in brief three obstructions: first, the obstruction to effortful practice; second, the obstruction to seclusion; third, the obstruction to quiescence.

"The obstruction to effortful practice" — it is that, when this obstruction is present, one has no capability and no power for any effortful practice with respect to the wholesome things. And what is this? It is chronic ailments, hardship, and grave illness; wind, heat, and phlegm arising again and again; or undigested food remaining within the body; or being bitten and stung by snakes, scorpions, centipedes, and millipedes; or being harassed by humans and non-humans; and, moreover, being unable to obtain clothing, food, bedding, medicines, and other utensils. All such things, it should be known, are called the obstruction to effortful practice.

What is "the obstruction to seclusion"? First, eating coarse and heavy fare; second, having many affairs, many undertakings, and much to do, or being fond of business, whereby, delighting in all sorts of business, one's mind scatters among this affair and that. Third, being fond of talk,though one has the capability and great power for the cultivation of seclusion, cutting off, and quiescence, yet with mere reciting one becomes content. Fourth, being fond of sleep,constantly bound by sluggishness and drowsiness, indolent by nature, taking sleeping, leaning, and lying down as pleasures. Fifth, being fond of noisy crowds,delighting to talk with laity and renunciants of the discourse on kings, the discourse on thieves, the discourse on food, the discourse on drink, the discourse on fine clothing, the discourse on the courtesans' lanes, the discourse on the various lands, the discourse handed down of great men, the discourse handed down of the world, and the discourse handed down of the great sea, and the like — the vain, ornate discourses that draw forth what is meaningless — thus idling away the days. Sixth, greatly delighting to gather often with crowds,whereby, among this affair and that, the mind is set moving and disturbed. Seventh, being fond of dwelling mixed among others,whereby, laity and renunciants alike, if one has not yet met them one longs to see them, and once one has met them one does not wish to part. Eighth, being fond of idle proliferation,delighting in the world's various idle proliferations, glad to press forward where one ought to turn toward practice, and gladly casting off the good yoke amid seclusion. All such numerous obstructive things, it should be known, are called the obstruction to seclusion. When this obstruction is present, it is hard to relinquish attachment to the wilderness, the mountain forests, and the open wastes, and one cannot dwell in the wilderness, among the tombs, beneath the trees, or in an empty quiet room.

"The obstruction to quiescence" — it is that "quiescence" means tranquillity (śamatha) 〔calming〕 and insight (vipaśyanā) 〔contemplation〕; there is the obstruction to tranquillity and the obstruction to insight.

"The obstruction to tranquillity" — it is negligence and dwelling in an improper place. Through negligence, either sluggishness and drowsiness bind the mind, or, having attained only tranquillity, one gives rise to relish for it, or the mind gladly enters upon what is inferior, or the mind gladly clings to what is dull; and by dwelling in such an improper place, humans or non-humans, noisy and mixed, disturb one, others harass one, and the mind gallops outward and scatters. This is called the obstruction to tranquillity; it should be known that this obstruction directly obstructs quiescence.

"The obstruction to insight" — it is being fond of self-reliant exaltation and being distracted. As for "being fond of self-reliant exaltation": suppose there is one who thinks thus — "I was born into a high clan, went forth in pure faith, am not inferior; the other monks are not so" — and through this exalts and elevates himself and disparages others; likewise, he thinks, "I was born into a wealthy clan and went forth in pure faith; I am not poor or deprived. I am furnished with fine appearance, delightful to behold and dignified; I am of much learning, retain what I have heard, and have accumulated my hearing; I am skilled in speech and complete in my words. The other monks are not so" — and through this exalts and elevates himself and disparages others; and because he thus exalts himself, he cannot from time to time respectfully question monks who are advanced in years, of much knowledge, and long-cultivated in the holy life, and those monks in turn do not from time to time open up for him what is not yet opened, or make clear for him what is not yet made clear, or earnestly and by wisdom penetrate the deep meaning of the phrases and disclose it to him by skillful means, on down to making his knowledge and vision pure — this is called the obstruction to insight of being fond of self-reliant exaltation. Again, suppose there is one who, having attained only a small portion of inferior knowledge and vision, dwells securely thereby, and through this exalts himself, and because he exalts himself he gives rise to contentment and seeks nothing higher — this is called the obstruction to insight in which one is fond of self-reliant exaltation and abides therein. As for "being distracted": suppose there is one whose faculties are not quiescent, whose faculties are distracted and clamorous, who at all times thinks evil thoughts, speaks evil speech, and does evil deeds, and cannot abide steadily or firmly in contemplating the dharmas, whereby his insight cannot be complete and cannot attain purity — this is called the obstruction to insight of distraction. Thus two things obstruct tranquillity (much negligence and dwelling in an improper place), and two things obstruct insight (being fond of self-reliant exaltation and being distracted).

Thus both the obstruction to tranquillity and the obstruction to insight are together called the obstruction to quiescence. This is called the summary meaning of obstruction. This very summary meaning together with the foregoing extensive explanation, taken together as one, is called obstruction. What is contrary to this obstruction, one should know, is freedom from obstruction — that is, the non-existence, the being-far-removed, the not-conjoining, and the not-coming-together of this obstruction is called freedom from obstruction.

The Thirteenth Gate · Cultivating Generous Giving

What is called generous giving? It is that, if a giving is by its nature without fault, and one cultivates giving in order to adorn the mind, to accompany the mind, to provide for the yoga, and to attain the higher goal, this is called generous giving.

Question: Who is able to give? Who is given to? With what does one give? What is the mark of giving? How does one give? For what reason does one give? — By these factors, the nature of giving is without fault.

〔Who is able to give〕 Answer: "The one able to give" means the giver and the donor. What is the giver? What is the donor? If one gives with one's own hand, this is called the giver; if one gives one's own property, and gives gladly, not unwillingly, this is called the donor.

〔Who is given to〕 "The one given to" means the four kinds of recipients: first, the suffering; second, the benefactors; third, the beloved; fourth, the venerable. What are "the suffering"? They are the poor, beggars, wayfarers, the needy, the blind, the deaf and dull, the destitute, the resourceless, those lacking the requisites of life, and others of the same kind; these are called the suffering. What are "the benefactors"? They are father and mother, the wet-nurse, those who reared one, those who raised one; or those who could ferry one across in the wilderness and the sandy wastes, those who could relieve one in times of famine, those who came to the rescue when one dreaded an enemy, those who could release one when one was bound in fetters, those who came to the aid and treatment when one met with illness, those who taught one benefit and taught one happiness, those who drew forth benefit and drew forth happiness, those who were companions amid all sorts of affairs, who shared one's joys and shared one's sorrows, and who did not abandon one when calamity struck, and others of the same kind; these are called benefactors. What are "the beloved"? They are one's kin and friends, in whose presence there is love and there is respect, or who speak trustingly, or who often speak and converse and keep company, or who are on intimate terms, and others of the same kind; these are called the beloved. What are "the venerable"? They are the ascetics and brahmins, those approved by common consent in the world as worthy and good, those free from doing harm and those utterly free from harming, those free from craving, those who practice for the taming of craving, those free from anger, those who practice for the taming of anger, those free from delusion, those who practice for the taming of delusion, and others of the same kind; these are called the venerable.

〔With what does one give〕 "With what one gives" — in brief, one practices generous giving using either things counted as sentient or things counted as non-sentient. What is practicing generous giving with "things counted as sentient"? It is either wife and children, servants and laborers, or elephants, horses, pigs, cattle, sheep, chickens, ducks, camels, mules, and the like, or other grown men and grown women, boys and girls, or again one's own inner body — head, eyes, hands, feet, blood, flesh, bone, and marrow — bestowed according to their wish (this is what the bodhisattvas practice, and is not the giving that is meant here). Only if someone truly has mastery, power, or control over those sentient beings; if it is proper to give them to another; if the giver incurs no fault in giving; if the gift does not cause resentment in another's mind; and if one knows that those beings will not thereby be harmed or troubled, is it called faultless generous giving with things counted as sentient. What is practicing generous giving with "things counted as non-sentient"? In brief there are three kinds of things: first, wealth-things (pearl-gems, true pearls, lapis lazuli, conch and cowrie, jade discs, coral, carnelian, colored stones, native-hued 〔gold〕 and dyeable 〔silver〕, red pearls, right-spiraling 〔"right-spiraling": the right-spiraling conch-shell, a mark of good fortune; this character in the base text reads 右旋 "right-spiraling," while the Song, Yuan, and Ming editions read 布施 "giving," and the Sheng edition reads 右施 "right-giving" — all three readings are recorded〕, or the various precious treasures, gold and silver, clothing, utensils, incense, and garlands); these and other things of the same kind are called wealth-things. Second, grain-things (things that may be eaten or drunk — barley, wheat, rice, millet, panic-millet, sesame, and the greater and lesser beans; sugarcane, grapes, milk and curd, fruit juice, and all sorts of drinks); these and other things of the same kind are called grain-things. Third, estate-things (fields and dwellings, shops and stalls, and the erecting of merit-houses, monasteries, and the like); these and other things of the same kind are called estate-things. This is called faultless generous giving with things counted as non-sentient. All things counted as sentient and non-sentient are together called the things used in giving.

〔What is the mark of giving〕 "The mark of giving" means the volition that operates conjoined with non-greed — the fashioning act of mind, together with the bodily act and verbal act that arise from it — in relinquishing the thing given (whether relinquishing one's own continuum or relinquishing another's continuum). This is called the mark of giving.

〔How does one give?〕 One gives through pure faith, through the view derived from the right teaching, through the view that deeds bear fruit, and with utmost earnestness; with a reverent mind one gives with one's own hand and does not slight the recipient; one gives at the proper time, meets another's pressing need, and does not harm or trouble another; lawfully and impartially, one does not give wealth amassed by cruel violence, but gives fresh and clean things, fine and wondrous things, and pure things, whereby self and other are both without fault; one gives repeatedly to subdue the stain of miserliness and accumulate the strength of giving; before giving the mind rejoices, while giving the mind is pure, and after giving it has no regret. This is what is meant by "thus one gives."

〔For what reason does one give〕 "For what reason one gives" — one gives out of loving-kindness and compassion (toward the suffering), or one gives out of gratitude (toward benefactors), or one gives out of love, respect, and trusting devotion (toward the beloved), or one gives seeking the surpassing qualities, worldly and world-transcending (toward the venerable). Through these factors one cultivates generous giving; and by these marks, whether laity or renunciant, one practices giving in order to adorn the mind, to accompany the mind, to provide for the yoga, and to attain the higher goal. Because of this, the nature of the giving is without fault, and this is called generous giving.

The Fourteenth Gate · The Adornments of the Ascetic

What is called the adornments of the ascetic? The summary verse 〔uddāna〕 says:

〔Verse〕 Right faith, without flattery, few illnesses, energetic effort, and wisdom; furnished with few wishes, contentment, being easy to support, and being easy to satisfy; the qualities of the purifying practices, dignity, knowing the measure, the ways of the good; furnished with the marks of the wise, endurance, gentle harmony, and being worthy and good.

It is that, suppose there is one furnished with right faith, without flattery or crookedness, with few illnesses, energetic by nature, accomplished in wondrous wisdom, of few wishes, content, easy to support, easy to satisfy, fully accomplished in the qualities of the purifying practices (the dhūta), dignified, knowing the measure, fully accomplished in the ways of the worthy and good, fully accomplished in the marks of the wise, enduring, gentle and harmonious, and worthy and good by nature.

What is being "furnished with right faith"? It is being of much pure faith, much right reverence and compliance, giving rise much to firm conviction, and much good wish and delight; toward the wholesome dharmas and toward the Great Master, giving rise to deep pure faith, without confusion and without doubt; toward the Great Master, being reverent, respectful, attending upon, and making offerings; and single-mindedly drawing near, relying on, and dwelling by. And as toward the Great Master, so likewise toward the Dharma, toward the fellows in the holy life, toward all the instructions and admonitions of the trainings, toward the making of offerings, toward non-negligence, and toward concentration. This is called being furnished with right faith.

What is being "without flattery or crookedness"? It is being of pure substance, upright by nature, and revealing oneself in accord with reality 〔not concealing anything〕 before the Great Master and the wise fellows in the holy life. This is called being without flattery or crookedness.

What is having "few illnesses"? It is being free from illness by nature, digesting in accord with the seasons, appropriating in balance, neither too warm nor too cold, without any harm, and at ease from time to time, so that what is eaten, drunk, chewed, and tasted is easily and rightly digested 〔assimilated〕. This is called having few illnesses.

What is being "energetic by nature"? It is being able to abide with strength, with diligence, with courage, firm and fierce; among the wholesome dharmas being able not to cast off the yoke 〔not to set down the burden〕; diligent and untiring, complete in the arousing of effort, able to accomplish things, and personally attending upon the wise fellows in the holy life. This is called being energetic by nature.

What is being "accomplished in wondrous wisdom"? It is having acuteness, mindfulness, and awareness all complete; the faculties not dull, not stupid, not mute, and not speaking by another's hand 〔not needing another to speak for one〕; having the power to understand the meaning of the dharmas well spoken and ill spoken, and being fully accomplished in the innate awareness-wisdom and the awareness-wisdom of applied practice. This is called being accomplished in wondrous wisdom.

What is "having few wishes"? It is, though accomplished in the good qualities of few wishes and the like, not wishing others to know that "I am furnished with few wishes and accomplished in these qualities." This is called having few wishes.

What is "contentment"? It is with any one sort of clothing, food, bedding, and the like, giving rise to gladness and to right contentment; with regard to clothing not yet obtained, whether coarse or fine, having no further longing or deliberation; and with regard to what is already obtained, using it without defilement and without attachment; and so likewise with food and bedding. This is called contentment.

What is being "easy to support"? It is being able, alone and by oneself, to nourish oneself well, without depending on others (whether servant-boys or other people), and moreover not pursuing surplus wealth and treasure, which would cause donors and the like to reckon one hard to support. This is called being easy to support.

What is being "easy to satisfy"? It is obtaining but little and sustaining oneself; if one obtains what is coarse and worn, one likewise sustains oneself. This is called being easy to satisfy.

"Accomplished in the qualities of the purifying practices" — that is, always begging for food, begging for food in sequence, eating at a single sitting only, taking one's fill first and then eating, keeping only the three robes, keeping only felt robes, keeping refuse-heap robes, dwelling in the wilderness, ever dwelling beneath the trees, ever dwelling in the open, ever dwelling among the tombs, ever seated upright, and dwelling in one's seat as it is 〔the various ascetic practices, the dhūta〕; the qualities of the purifying practices resting on food, on robes, and on the various furnishings are either twelve kinds or thirteen kinds. Within begging for food there is a twofold division: first, begging for food as it comes (receiving food according to the houses one comes and goes past, taking whatever one gains); second, begging for food in sequence (entering the lanes, going from house to house begging, and receiving food according to what appears and is obtained, not raising one's hand high to pass over toward another house in the wish to obtain fine food, and so on down to setting one's hope on obtaining much). One should know that herein: if one takes begging for food as undifferentiated, there are only twelve; if one takes begging for food as differentiated 〔dividing it into as-it-comes and in-sequence〕, there are then thirteen.

"Eating at a single sitting only" — sitting on one seat, receiving all that ought to be eaten, and once one has risen from that seat, never eating again. This is called eating at a single sitting only. "Taking one's fill first and then eating" — for the sake of eating, one sits on a fitting seat, and before eating one first fully receives all that ought to be eaten, rightly knowing "I now receive only this much food and drink, and will sustain myself thereby" and "beyond this I shall certainly not eat"; having received it thus, only then does one eat. This is called taking one's fill first and then eating. "Keeping only the three robes" — sustaining oneself with only three robes; what are the three robes? First, the saṃghāṭī 〔the great robe〕; second, the uttarāsaṅga 〔the upper robe, of seven strips〕; third, the antarvāsa 〔the lower robe, of five strips〕; apart from these, one never stores up surplus robes. This is called keeping only the three robes. "Keeping only felt robes" — the robes one keeps (whether the three robes or surplus robes) are all made of wool-felt, and one never stores up other kinds of made robes. This is called keeping only felt robes. "Keeping refuse-heap robes" — the robes that others have discarded, cast into the streets, lanes, markets, shops, roads and byroads, or soiled with excrement, or smeared and stained with excrement, pus, blood, snot, and spittle; one takes such impure cloth, removes the coarse filth, firmly washes it, sews and dyes it, and keeps it. This is called keeping refuse-heap robes. What is "dwelling in the wilderness"? It is dwelling in the empty and quiet mountain forests and open wastes, using the furthermost bedding, keeping far from all villages and settlements. This is called dwelling in the wilderness. "Ever dwelling beneath the trees" — ever vowing to dwell beneath the trees, resting on the roots of the trees. This is called ever dwelling beneath the trees. "Ever dwelling in the open" — ever vowing to dwell in the open, in a place without cover or shelter. This is called ever dwelling in the open. "Ever dwelling among the tombs" — ever vowing to dwell among the burial mounds, the places where the dead are sent off with their corpses. This is called ever dwelling among the tombs. "Ever seated upright" — on a large bed, a small rope-bed, or a seat of grass and leaves, sitting with the body upright and passing the days thus, never leaning one's back or side against the bed, wall, tree, or seat. This is called ever sitting upright. "Dwelling in one's seat as it is" — with the grass seat or leaf seat one sits and lies upon, one sits and lies constantly on the grass seat or leaf seat laid out as before, and once it is laid out one never turns it over and repairs it again and again. This is called dwelling in one's seat as it is.

Question: Why are they called "the qualities of the purifying practices"? Answer: It is like wool or fine wool-cloth 〔fine woolen felt〕 in the world: before it is beaten, plucked, teased, and pulled apart, it clings together, is neither soft nor light, and is unfit for making into thread, felt, and cushions; but once beaten, plucked, teased, and pulled apart, it scatters loose, becomes soft, light, and fine, and is fit for making into thread, felt, and cushions. So too the practitioner: through greed for food, greed for clothing, and greed for furnishings, the mind is defiled and attached to food, clothing, and furnishings; and that person, through these qualities of the purifying practices, is able to purify and refine, making the mind upright, soft, light, and fine, capable, in accord and resting well, and able to cultivate the holy life — and therefore they are called the qualities of the purifying practices. 〔The pairings:〕 With respect to food there is greed for tasty food and greed for much food, which are able to obstruct the cultivation of good: to cut off greed for tasty food, one always begs for food and begs in sequence; to cut off greed for much food, one eats at a single sitting only and takes one's fill first and then eats. With respect to clothing there is greed for many robes, greed for a soft touch, and greed for the fine and wondrous: to cut off greed for many robes, one keeps only the three robes; to cut off greed for a soft touch, one keeps only felt robes; to cut off greed for the fine and wondrous, one keeps refuse-heap robes. With respect to furnishings there is greed for noisy crowds, greed for buildings, greed for the pleasure of leaning and the pleasure of lying, and greed for furnishings: to cut off greed for noisy crowds, one dwells in the wilderness; to cut off greed for buildings, one ever dwells beneath the trees, in the open, and among the tombs (and to cut off greed for lust, one ever dwells among the tombs); to cut off greed for the pleasure of leaning and lying, one ever sits upright; to cut off greed for furnishings, one dwells in one's seat as it is. This is called being accomplished in the qualities of the purifying practices.

What is "Dignity" — being able to accomplish the dignified bearing in going and returning, in looking down and looking up, in bending and stretching, and in carrying the saṃghāṭī, carrying the robes, and carrying the bowl. This is called dignity.

What is "knowing the measure"? It is with regard to the clothing, food, furnishings, medicines, and various utensils that faithful brahmins, householders, and lay-lords bestow to the utmost, gathering in a measured way 〔not craving much〕. This is called knowing the measure.

What is "Accomplished in the ways of the worthy and good" — whether born into a high clan or born into a wealthy clan, one goes forth in pure faith, of fine countenance, delightful to behold and dignified, furnished with much learning, and complete in speech; or, having obtained but a little knowledge, a little vision, and a little dwelling-in-ease, one does not through this exalt oneself or disparage others, is able to know that "only the practice of the Dharma in accord with the Dharma is what is true and real," and, having understood this, energetically practices the Dharma in accord with the Dharma. This is called being accomplished in the ways of the worthy and good.

What is "Accomplished in the marks of the wise" — by the mark of one's deeds one is shown to be a fool, and by the mark of one's deeds one is shown to be wise: fools think evil thoughts, speak evil speech, and do evil deeds; the wise think good thoughts, speak good speech, and do good deeds. This is called being accomplished in the marks of the wise.

What is "Endurance" — not returning abuse for abuse, not returning anger for anger, not returning a blow for a blow, not returning mockery for mockery; and being able to bear cold and heat, hunger and thirst, mosquitoes and gadflies, wind and sun, the poisonous touch of snakes and scorpions, the encroachments of others and their coarse, evil speech, and the sharp, hard, acrid, cutting, and life-robbing sufferings arising within the body — being by nature enduring and having the capacity to take them in. This is called endurance.

What is "Gentle harmony" — toward the Great Master and the rest, being fully accomplished in bodily acts, verbal acts, and mental acts of loving pity; sharing in common with the wise fellows in the holy life the enjoyment of what ought to be enjoyed; with all food and drink having nothing kept privately, but using what has been lawfully gained and lawfully obtained, fallen into the bowl and gathered by the bowl; sharing the same precepts and the same views, and accomplishing these six things that are delightful, lovable, and worthy of esteem, free from contention, easy to dwell with, and by nature not troubling to others; ever making the fellows in the holy life glad while dwelling together in one place 〔that is, the six points of reverent harmony〕. This is called gentle harmony.

What is "Worthy and good" — being far removed from frowning, with an open countenance and level gaze, smiling and speaking first, ever using kindly speech, by nature much gathering in good-Dharma companions, and pure in body and mind. This is called being worthy and good.

If one accomplishes such dharmas, one delights in the true Dharma and delights in the qualities, and does not delight in gain, honor, and praise; nor does one accomplish the two wrong views of over-affirmation and under-denial — never over-affirming what is not existent, never under-denying what really exists; with regard to the various ornate-worded compositions of the world — the worldly, ornately embellished phrases and poetic discourses — one is able to know rightly that they are meaningless and without benefit, and so keeps far from them, casts them off, does not practice or love them, and does not spread them; one does not delight in storing up surplus robes and bowls; one keeps far from dwelling mixed among the laity in noisy crowds (because it increases the afflictions), and delights to dwell in harmony with the holy assembly (because it purifies and cultivates wisdom); one does not delight in gathering in kinsfolk and friends (fearing only that through such ties of kin and friendship one would draw upon oneself measureless disturbing affairs, and that if they should be ruined and lost, one would give rise to all sorts of grief, lament, sorrow, suffering, and distress); with regard to the root afflictions and the derivative afflictions that arise, one does not firmly cling to them but forthwith relinquishes, expels, and spews them out (fearing only that through the ties of these two afflictions one would give rise to the manifold sufferings of the present life and later lives); one never vainly wastes any gift of faith, never breaches the pure precepts while using a gift of faith, never disparages another's gift of faith, and never casts off the training rules one has received; one ever delights to examine one's own faults and does not delight in seeking out others' transgressions, concealing one's own good and disclosing one's own evil; even at the cost of one's life one does not deliberately breach the manifold offenses, and should one, through lapse of mindfulness, commit some small breach, one straightway and swiftly repents and removes it in accord with the Dharma; with regard to what ought to be done one is diligent and untiring, able to accomplish all one's affairs by oneself, and never seeks to have another serve as one's attendant; toward the inconceivable majesty and spiritual power and the very deep Dharma-teaching of the Blessed Buddha and the Buddha's disciples, one gives rise to deep faith and understanding and never slanders them, being able to know rightly that "this is only what the Tathāgata knows and sees; it is not my range"; and one never delights to dwell in the discourses and spells born of one's own deluded view-grasping, unreasonable perverse attachment, and evil views.

If one is furnished with such qualities, abiding thus, training thus, and adorning oneself with the various adornments of the true ascetic, it is exceedingly wondrous. It is like a person, hale and handsome, fond of adorning himself and glad to enjoy the desires, who bathes his body and head, anoints himself with fine fragrance, dons fresh white garments, and decks himself with all sorts of wondrous adornments — namely necklaces, earrings, finger-rings, wrist-bracelets, arm-bracelets, various fine jeweled seals, together with gold and silver and all sorts of flower-garlands — such adornment being exceedingly marvelous. So too the practitioner, adorning himself with the various wondrous adornments that are the qualities of the true ascetic — his virtue blazing, his majestic radiance shining everywhere — is therefore said to have the adornments of the ascetic. This is the meaning of the adornments of the ascetic.

聲聞地 · 第二瑜伽處 · 補特伽羅The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · Second Yoga-Station · The Person (Pudgala)

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

第二瑜伽處開卷。先以一段「科目嗢拕南」標出本處將廣說的十八個題目,再正說頭兩個——補特伽羅的二十八種品類,與由十一種差別道理建立補特伽羅。名相留舊(補特伽羅=數取趣、人;預流·一來·不還·阿羅漢=四沙門果),逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回所略。

〔本地分中聲聞地第十三第二瑜伽處之一〕

開卷·本處將說的十八個題目

問:在前面初瑜伽處所舉示、所開示的「出離地」中,有幾種品類的補特伽羅能證得出離?又——怎麼建立補特伽羅?什麼是所緣?什麼是教授?什麼是學?什麼是隨順學法?什麼是瑜伽壞?什麼是瑜伽?什麼是作意?什麼是瑜伽師、有幾種瑜伽師所作?什麼是瑜伽修?什麼是修果?有幾種補特伽羅的異門(不同名稱)?有幾種補特伽羅?有幾種建立補特伽羅的因緣?有幾種魔、幾種魔事?什麼是「發趣空無有果」(白費功夫、發起趣求卻空無所成)?

嗢拕南(攝頌)說:   諸補特伽羅、建立、所緣、教,
  學、隨順學法、壞、瑜伽、作意,
  瑜伽師、作、修、果、門、數取趣,
  因、魔事、無果——這些都將一一廣說。

〔以下先說頭兩目:補特伽羅品類、建立補特伽羅。〕

一、補特伽羅的二十八種品類

補特伽羅的品類差別有二十八種。哪二十八種?就是:鈍根者、利根者、貪增上者、瞋增上者、癡增上者、慢增上者、尋思增上者、得平等者、薄塵性者、行向者、住果者、隨信行者、隨法行者、信勝解者、見至者、身證者、極七返有者、家家者、一間者、中般涅槃者、生般涅槃者、無行般涅槃者、有行般涅槃者、上流者、時解脫者、不動法者、慧解脫者、俱分解脫者。

1. 鈍根補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,成就鈍根,對於所應了知的事,理解運轉遲鈍、微弱(如前面已說過)。這又有兩種,應知其相:一者、本來就是鈍根種姓;二者、是還沒有好好修習諸根。

2. 利根補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,成就利根,對於所應了知的事,理解運轉不遲鈍、不微弱(如前已說)。這也有兩種:一者、本來就是利根種姓;二者、是已經好好修習諸根。

3. 貪增上補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,在過去其餘各生中,對貪煩惱已修、已習、已多多修習;由這因緣,今生對於所愛之事,便有猛利的貪、有長時的貪。這名為貪增上補特伽羅。

4. 瞋增上補特伽羅:就是過去餘生中對瞋煩惱已修、已習、已多修習;由此因緣,今生對於所憎之事,有猛利瞋、有長時瞋。這名為瞋增上補特伽羅。

5. 癡增上補特伽羅:就是過去餘生中對癡煩惱已修、已習、已多修習;由此因緣,今生對於所愚之事,有猛利癡、有長時癡。這名為癡增上補特伽羅。

6. 慢增上補特伽羅:就是過去餘生中對慢煩惱已修、已習、已多修習;由此因緣,今生對於所慢之事,有猛利慢、有長時慢。這名為慢增上補特伽羅。

7. 尋思增上補特伽羅:就是過去餘生中對尋思已修、已習、已多修習;由此因緣,今生對於所尋思之事,有猛利尋思、有長時尋思。這名為尋思增上補特伽羅。

8. 得平等補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,過去餘生中對貪、瞋、癡、慢、尋思雖不修、不習、不多修習,但也未曾見其過患、未能厭壞、未善加推求。由此因緣,對於所愛、所憎、所愚、所慢、所尋思之事,雖無猛利貪、無長時貪,然而面對那些事時,貪還是會現行(貪等五者平平都有,不偏盛也未伏斷)。貪如此,瞋、癡、慢、尋思也一樣。這名為得平等補特伽羅。

9. 薄塵性補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,過去餘生中對貪煩惱雖不修、不習、不多修習,卻已能對它多見過患、已能厭壞、已善推求。由此因緣,今生面對所愛之事現前時,在眾多美妙的上品境界中只起微劣的貪;在中品、下品境界中,貪全然不起。貪如此,瞋、癡、慢、尋思也應知一樣。這名為薄塵性補特伽羅(煩惱塵垢稀薄)。

10. 行向補特伽羅:就是行於四向的補特伽羅。哪四向?一、預流果向,二、一來果向,三、不還果向,四、阿羅漢果向。這名為行向補特伽羅。

11. 住果補特伽羅:就是安住四果的補特伽羅。哪四果?一、預流果,二、一來果,三、不還果,四、阿羅漢果。這名為住果補特伽羅。

12. 隨信行補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,向他人求請教授教誡,靠這力量修證果行;他並不是依自己所聞、所受、所究竟、所思、所量、所觀察的法,自有功能、自有勢力而隨法修行,而只是隨順他人、由信而修行。這名為隨信行補特伽羅。

13. 隨法行補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,能依自己所聞、所受、所究竟、所思、所量、所觀察的法,自有功能、自有勢力而隨法修行,不必向他人求教授教誡而修證果行。這名為隨法行補特伽羅。

14. 信勝解補特伽羅:就是那隨信行補特伽羅,因他人教授教誡,到於沙門果得觸證之時,便名為信勝解補特伽羅。

15. 見至補特伽羅:就是那隨法行補特伽羅,到於沙門果得觸證之時,便名為見至補特伽羅(由見諦而至)。

16. 身證補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,對於八解脫能順逆入出、以身作證,多分安住其中,卻還未能證得諸漏永盡。這名為身證補特伽羅。

17. 極七返有補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,已能永斷薩迦耶見、戒禁取、疑這三種結,得預流果,成為「無墮法」(決不墮惡趣),決定趣向菩提。他在天、人之間往來受生,至多七返,便證得苦的邊際(盡苦)。這名為極七返有補特伽羅。

18. 家家補特伽羅:有兩種家家。一、天家家,二、人家家。天家家,就是在天上從一家轉生到另一家,或往或來,而證得苦邊際;人家家,就是在人間從一家轉生到另一家,或往或來,而證得苦邊際。應知這兩種都是預流補特伽羅(預流位中將近一來者)。

19. 一間補特伽羅:就是那一來補特伽羅,正行於不還果向,已能永斷欲界煩惱的上品、中品,只餘下品;只需再受一次欲界天有,就在那裡得般涅槃,不再還來生於此世間。「一間」即只隔一生。這名為一間補特伽羅。

20. 中般涅槃補特伽羅:有三種中般涅槃補特伽羅(皆於「中有」位般涅槃)。  一、有一種:從此處命終後,中有續生;中有一生起,便即般涅槃。就像小小一片札火,微星才一揚起,隨即就謝滅了。  二、有一種:從此命終後,中有續生;中有生起後,稍停片時,還未趣向「生有」,便般涅槃。就像一塊燒紅的鐵摶鋌,炎熾通紅,鎚打時火星迸流,星子還沒落下就滅了。  三、有一種:從此命終後,中有續生;中有生起後,已趣向生有,卻還未得生有,便般涅槃。就像那塊熱鐵,椎打時火星迸流,星子落下、還未到地,就即謝滅了。  這三種中般涅槃補特伽羅,總說為一種「中般涅槃補特伽羅」。

21. 生般涅槃補特伽羅:就是才一生到那(色界)處,便即般涅槃。這名為生般涅槃補特伽羅。

22. 無行般涅槃補特伽羅:就是生到那處後,不必另起加行、不作功用、不由勞倦,聖道便自然現前而般涅槃。這名為無行般涅槃補特伽羅。

23. 有行般涅槃補特伽羅:就是生到那處後,要發起加行、作大功用、經極勞倦,聖道才現前而般涅槃。這名為有行般涅槃補特伽羅。

24. 上流補特伽羅:就是有一種不還補特伽羅,從此處上生到初靜慮後,住在那裡並不般涅槃;從那裡命終,又輾轉上生到更上的各個所生之處,乃至或到色究竟天,或到非想非非想處(才般涅槃)。「上流」即向上流轉。這名為上流補特伽羅。

25. 時解脫補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,是鈍根種姓,對於世間的現法樂住(諸禪定樂)容或有退失,或思自害、或守護解脫,便奮力勤修不放逸行——為了防退失的緣故,或只安住自分善品,或經由一日一夜、剎那、瞬息、須臾,努力勝進,乃至還未證到最極猛利(的不退)。「時解脫」即須待時、待緣方得解脫。這名為時解脫補特伽羅。

26. 不動法補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,與上面(時解脫)相反——利根、於現法樂住定無退失,應知這名為不動法補特伽羅。

27. 慧解脫補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,已能證得諸漏永盡,但對於八解脫還未能以身證、具足安住(只斷煩惱障,未得滅盡定)。這名為慧解脫補特伽羅。

28. 俱分解脫補特伽羅:就是有一種補特伽羅,已能證得諸漏永盡,又對於八解脫已以身作證、具足安住——對「煩惱障分」與「解脫障分(定障)」這兩分,心都得到解脫。所以名為俱分解脫補特伽羅。

二、由十一種差別道理建立補特伽羅

怎麼建立補特伽羅?就是由十一種差別道理,應知建立補特伽羅。哪十一種差別道理?一、根差別,二、眾差別,三、行差別,四、願差別,五、行迹差別,六、道果差別,七、加行差別,八、定差別,九、生差別,十、退不退差別,十一、障差別。

(一)由根差別建立:由根的差別,建立兩種補特伽羅——一者鈍根,二者利根。

(二)由眾差別建立:由眾(僧團身分)的差別,建立七種補特伽羅——比丘、比丘尼、式叉摩那(正學女)、勞策男(沙彌)、勞策女(沙彌尼)、近事男(優婆塞)、近事女(優婆夷)。

(三)由行差別建立:由行(煩惱習性)的差別,建立七種補特伽羅——貪增上者名「貪行者」,瞋增上者名「瞋行者」,癡增上者名「癡行者」,慢增上者名「慢行者」,尋思增上者名「尋思行者」,得平等者名「等分行者」,薄塵性者名「薄塵行者」。

問:貪行補特伽羅應知是什麼相? 答:貪行補特伽羅,對於那些微劣的所愛之事,尚且能生起最極、厚重、上品的貪纏,何況中品、上品的境界。而且這貪纏住在身中,經久相續、長時隨縛。由於貪纏,他被可愛之法所制伏,卻不能制伏那可愛之法。他諸根悅豫、諸根不剛強、諸根不澀、諸根不粗;為性不喜歡用惡身語去損惱他人;難使他遠離、難使他厭患(所愛);勝解下劣;所作事業堅牢、久固,禁戒堅牢、久固,能忍、能受。對資生之具為性耽染,深生愛重,多喜多悅,遠離顰蹙(不皺眉),舒顏平視,含笑先言。如此等類,應知這名為貪行者相。

問:瞋行補特伽羅應知是什麼相? 答:瞋行補特伽羅,對於那些微劣的所憎之事,尚且能生起最極、厚重、上品的瞋纏,何況中品、上品境界。這瞋纏住在身中,經久相續、長時隨縛。由此瞋纏,他被可憎之法所制伏,不能制伏那可憎之法。他諸根枯槁、諸根剛強、諸根疏澀、諸根粗燥;為性好用惡身語損惱他人;容易使他遠離、容易使他厭患;兇暴、強口,形相稜層(峻刻);無多勝解;所作事業不堅、不固,禁戒不堅、不固;不忍、不受;多憂多惱,性好違背,所取不順,性多愁慼,性好粗言,多懷嫌恨,意樂慘烈,悖惡尤甚,好相拒對,得人少許言語便多恚多憤,憔悴而住,喜生忿怒,眉面顰蹙,恆不舒顏,斜眼下視,對他人的榮利多憎多嫉。如此等類,應知這名為瞋行者相。

問:癡行補特伽羅應知是什麼相? 答:癡行補特伽羅,對於那些微劣的所愚之事,尚且能生起最極、厚重、上品的癡纏,何況中品、上品境界。這癡纏住在身中,經久相續、長時隨縛。由此癡纏,他被可癡之法所制伏,不能制伏那可癡之法。他諸根闇鈍、諸根愚昧、諸根羸劣;身業遲緩、語業遲緩;惡思所思、惡說所說、惡作所作;懶惰懈怠,起事不圓滿;言詞辯才薄弱,性不聰敏,念多忘失,安住時不正知;所取偏邪(左僻);難使遠離、難使厭患;勝解下劣;頑騃、瘖瘂,以手代言;沒有能力領解善說、惡說的法義;被所緣牽纏,被他人引奪,被他人差使。如此等類,應知這名為癡行者相。

問:慢行補特伽羅應知是什麼相? 答:慢行補特伽羅,對於那些微劣的所慢之事,尚且能生起最極、厚重、上品的慢纏,何況中品、上品境界。這慢纏住在身中,經久相續、長時隨縛。由於慢纏,他被可慢之法所制伏,不能制伏那可慢之法。他諸根掉動、諸根高舉、諸根散亂;勤於樂著嚴飾己身,言語高大,不樂謙下;對父母、眷屬、師長不能時時如法承事;多懷憍傲,不肯以身禮敬、問訊、合掌、迎逆、修和敬之業;自高自舉,陵蔑他人。樂著利養、樂著恭敬、樂著世間的稱譽聲頌;所為輕舉,喜作嘲調戲弄;難使遠離、難使厭患;勝解廣大;慈悲微劣;計著「我、有情、命者、養者、補特伽羅、生者」等諸見,多分屬上品;多怨、多恨。如此等類,應知這名為慢行者相。

問:尋思行補特伽羅應知是什麼相? 答:尋思行補特伽羅,對於那些微劣的所尋思之事,尚且能發起最極厚重、上品的尋思纏,何況中品、上品境界。這尋思纏住在身中,經久相續、長時隨縛。由此纏故,他被可尋思之法所制伏,不能制伏那可尋思之法。他諸根不住、諸根飄舉、諸根掉動、諸根散亂;身業誤失、語業誤失;難使遠離、難使厭患;喜為戲論、樂著戲論;多惑、多疑、多懷樂欲;禁戒不堅、不定,事業不堅、不定;多懷恐慮,念多忘失,不樂遠離,多樂散動;對世間種種妙事貪欲隨流而轉;卻又翹勤無惰,起事圓滿(精力旺而難收)。如此等類,應知這名為尋思行者相。

以上就名為「由行差別建立補特伽羅」。

(四)由願差別建立:或有補特伽羅於聲聞乘已發正願,或於獨覺乘已發正願,或於大乘已發正願。應知這當中——若補特伽羅於聲聞乘已發正願,他或是聲聞種姓、或獨覺種姓、或大乘種姓;若於獨覺菩提已發正願,他或獨覺種姓、或聲聞種姓、或大乘種姓;若於大乘已發正願,他或大乘種姓、或獨覺種姓、或聲聞種姓(願與種姓未必相符)。但若聲聞種姓的補特伽羅,對獨覺菩提、或對無上正等菩提已發正願,他既是聲聞種姓,後來決定還要捨那願,終必唯安住於聲聞乘願;獨覺乘種姓、大乘種姓的補特伽羅,也應知一樣。所以,這當中所有補特伽羅,「願」可以移轉、可以捨離,「種姓」卻決定不可移轉、不可捨離。今此義中,應知只說「於聲聞乘已發正願、且是聲聞種姓」的補特伽羅。這就名為由願差別建立補特伽羅。

(五)由行迹差別建立:如前所舉、所開示的補特伽羅,依四種行迹而得出離。哪四種?或有行迹是「苦遲通」,或是「苦速通」,或是「樂遲通」,或是「樂速通」。應知這當中:若鈍根性補特伽羅,還未得根本靜慮(只憑未至定等修),所有行迹名「苦遲通」(修起來苦、通達又慢);若利根性而未得根本靜慮,名「苦速通」(苦而快);若鈍根性而已得根本靜慮,名「樂遲通」(樂而慢);若利根性而已得根本靜慮,名「樂速通」(樂而快)。這名為由行迹差別建立補特伽羅。

(六)由道果差別建立:就是「行四向」與「住四果」。行四向者:一、預流果向,二、一來果向,三、不還果向,四、阿羅漢果向補特伽羅。住四果者:一、預流果,二、一來果,三、不還果,四、阿羅漢果。若在向道上轉的,名「行向者」,由向道建立四種補特伽羅;若已得沙門果的,名「住果者」,由道果建立四種補特伽羅。這名為由道果差別建立補特伽羅。

(七)由加行差別建立:就是隨信行與隨法行補特伽羅。若隨順補特伽羅(他人)的信而勤修正行,名隨信行補特伽羅;若對諸法不待他緣、隨毗柰耶(律/法則)而勤修正行,名隨法行補特伽羅。這名為由加行差別建立補特伽羅。

(八)由定差別建立:就是身證補特伽羅,對八解脫已以身作證、具足安住,卻還未獲得諸漏永盡。應知這種補特伽羅,對於「有色觀諸色解脫、內無色想觀外諸色解脫、淨解脫身作證具足住、空無邊處解脫、識無邊處解脫、無所有處解脫、非想非非想處解脫、想受滅解脫」這八解脫,已能順逆入出自在。這名為由定差別建立補特伽羅。

(九)由生差別建立:就是極七返有、家家、一間、中般涅槃、生般涅槃、無行般涅槃、有行般涅槃、以及上流補特伽羅(皆以「受生」之相差別而立)。這名為由生差別建立補特伽羅。

(十)由退不退差別建立:由「退」,建立時解脫阿羅漢——他對現法樂住容或有退失;由「不退」,建立不動法阿羅漢——他對現法樂住決定無退失。這名為由退不退差別建立補特伽羅。

(十一)由障差別建立:就是慧解脫與俱分解脫阿羅漢。慧解脫阿羅漢,是已解脫煩惱障、未解脫定障;俱分解脫阿羅漢,是已解脫煩惱障、又已解脫定障,所以說名俱分解脫。這名為由障差別建立補特伽羅。

由以上所舉、所開示的種種差別道理,照其次第,應知就這樣建立補特伽羅。

The Second Yoga-Station opens. First, a "topic-heading uddāna" sets out the eighteen subjects that will be expounded at length in this station; then it directly expounds the first two — the twenty-eight classifications of the person, and the establishment of the person by eleven differentiating principles. Names are kept as of old (person = pudgala, "the one who repeatedly takes up the destinies," the human being; stream-enterer · once-returner · non-returner · arhat = the four fruits of the śramaṇa). Rendered clause by clause into today's language, without adding doctrine, without citing treatises, without annotating Sanskrit; where the treatise-text compresses, what it abbreviates is supplied back in 〔brackets〕.

〔Within the Basic Section, the Śrāvaka Stage, the thirteenth · the first part of the Second Yoga-Station〕

Opening: The Eighteen Subjects This Station Will Expound

Question: Within the "stage of departure" that was raised and shown in the earlier First Yoga-Station, how many classifications of persons can attain departure? And — how is the person established? What is the object? What is instruction? What is training? What are the dharmas conducive to training? What is the ruin of yoga? What is yoga? What is attention? What is the yoga practitioner, and how many kinds of doing does the yoga practitioner have? What is the cultivation of yoga? What is the fruit of cultivation? How many alternate designations (different names) are there for the person? How many persons are there? How many causes and conditions are there for establishing the person? How many kinds of Māra, and how many deeds of Māra, are there? What is "setting out in vain, without fruit" (laboring to no purpose, giving rise to the pursuit yet accomplishing nothing)?

The uddāna (the summary verse) says:

  The persons, their establishment, the object, instruction,
  training, the dharmas conducive to training, ruin, yoga, attention,
  the yoga practitioner, doing, cultivation, fruit, the alternate names, the one who takes up the destinies,
  cause, the deeds of Māra, and the fruitless — all these will be expounded at length one by one.

〔What follows first expounds the first two subjects: the classifications of the person, and the establishment of the person.〕

One · The Twenty-Eight Classifications of the Person

The differences in the classification of the person are of twenty-eight kinds. Which twenty-eight? They are: one of dull faculties, one of sharp faculties, one in whom craving is predominant, one in whom hatred is predominant, one in whom delusion is predominant, one in whom conceit is predominant, one in whom discursive thought is predominant, one who has attained the even balance, one of thin dust-nature, one coursing toward [a fruit], one abiding in a fruit, one who practices by following through faith, one who practices by following the dharma, one who is convinced through faith, one who has arrived at seeing, one who is a body-witness, one who has at most seven returns of existence, one who is "household-to-household," one who has a single interval, one who reaches parinirvāṇa in the interim, one who reaches parinirvāṇa upon being born, one who reaches parinirvāṇa without exertion, one who reaches parinirvāṇa with exertion, one who flows upward, one liberated at [certain] times, one of the unshakable dharma, one liberated by wisdom, and one liberated in both parts.

1. The person of dull faculties: that is, there is a kind of person who has achieved dull faculties, whose understanding operates, with respect to the matters that ought to be known, sluggishly and feebly (as already stated earlier). This is again of two kinds, whose marks should be known: first, one who is by original lineage of dull faculties; second, one who has not yet well cultivated the faculties.

2. The person of sharp faculties: that is, there is a kind of person who has achieved sharp faculties, whose understanding operates, with respect to the matters that ought to be known, neither sluggishly nor feebly (as already stated). This too is of two kinds: first, one who is by original lineage of sharp faculties; second, one who has already well cultivated the faculties.

3. The person in whom craving is predominant: that is, there is a kind of person who, in his various past other lives, has already cultivated, already practiced, already much cultivated the affliction of craving; by this cause and condition, in the present life, toward the things that are craved, he has sharp craving and long-lasting craving. This is named the person in whom craving is predominant.

4. The person in whom hatred is predominant: that is, one who in his past other lives has already cultivated, already practiced, already much cultivated the affliction of hatred; by this cause and condition, in the present life, toward the things that are hated, he has sharp hatred and long-lasting hatred. This is named the person in whom hatred is predominant.

5. The person in whom delusion is predominant: that is, one who in his past other lives has already cultivated, already practiced, already much cultivated the affliction of delusion; by this cause and condition, in the present life, toward the things about which he is deluded, he has sharp delusion and long-lasting delusion. This is named the person in whom delusion is predominant.

6. The person in whom conceit is predominant: that is, one who in his past other lives has already cultivated, already practiced, already much cultivated the affliction of conceit; by this cause and condition, in the present life, toward the things about which he is conceited, he has sharp conceit and long-lasting conceit. This is named the person in whom conceit is predominant.

7. The person in whom discursive thought is predominant: that is, one who in his past other lives has already cultivated, already practiced, already much cultivated discursive thought; by this cause and condition, in the present life, toward the things that are discursively thought about, he has sharp discursive thought and long-lasting discursive thought. This is named the person in whom discursive thought is predominant.

8. The person who has attained the even balance: that is, there is a kind of person who, in his past other lives, did not cultivate, did not practice, did not much cultivate craving, hatred, delusion, conceit, and discursive thought, yet who also did not once see their fault and danger, was not able to become weary of and undo them, and did not well investigate them. By this cause and condition, toward the things craved, hated, deluded about, conceited about, and discursively thought about, although he has no sharp craving and no long-lasting craving, still, when he faces those things, craving does yet arise into activity (craving and the other four are all present evenly, neither predominant nor suppressed-and-severed). As it is with craving, so it is with hatred, delusion, conceit, and discursive thought. This is named the person who has attained the even balance.

9. The person of thin dust-nature: that is, there is a kind of person who, in his past other lives, did not cultivate, did not practice, did not much cultivate the affliction of craving, yet who has already been able to see much of its fault and danger, has already been able to become weary of and undo it, and has already well investigated it. By this cause and condition, in the present life, when the things craved appear before him, among the many fine, superior-grade objects he raises only a slight and inferior craving; toward middling-grade and lower-grade objects, craving does not arise at all. As it is with craving, so it should be known with hatred, delusion, conceit, and discursive thought. This is named the person of thin dust-nature (the dust and grime of affliction being thin).

10. The person coursing toward [a fruit]: that is, the person who courses along the four coursings-toward. Which four coursings-toward? First, the coursing toward the fruit of stream-entry; second, the coursing toward the fruit of once-returning; third, the coursing toward the fruit of non-returning; fourth, the coursing toward the fruit of arhatship. This is named the person coursing toward [a fruit].

11. The person abiding in a fruit: that is, the person who abides in the four fruits. Which four fruits? First, the fruit of stream-entry; second, the fruit of once-returning; third, the fruit of non-returning; fourth, the fruit of arhatship. This is named the person abiding in a fruit.

12. The person who practices by following through faith: that is, there is a kind of person who requests instruction and admonition from another, and by that strength cultivates-and-realizes the practice toward the fruit; he does not, by the dharma that he has himself heard, received, brought to a conclusion, thought over, weighed, and examined, having his own competence and his own force, practice by following the dharma — but only, following after another, practices out of faith. This is named the person who practices by following through faith.

13. The person who practices by following the dharma: that is, there is a kind of person who is able, by the dharma that he has himself heard, received, brought to a conclusion, thought over, weighed, and examined, having his own competence and his own force, to practice by following the dharma, and who need not request instruction and admonition from another in order to cultivate-and-realize the practice toward the fruit. This is named the person who practices by following the dharma.

14. The person convinced through faith: that is, that person who practices by following through faith, at the time when — through another's instruction and admonition — he reaches and gains the touching-realization of a śramaṇa-fruit, is then named the person convinced through faith.

15. The person who has arrived at seeing: that is, that person who practices by following the dharma, at the time when he reaches and gains the touching-realization of a śramaṇa-fruit, is then named the person who has arrived at seeing (having arrived by seeing the truths).

16. The person who is a body-witness: that is, there is a kind of person who, with respect to the eight liberations, is able to enter and emerge in forward and reverse order, and bears witness with the body, abiding in them for the most part, yet has not yet been able to realize the perpetual exhaustion of the outflows. This is named the person who is a body-witness.

17. The person who has at most seven returns of existence: that is, there is a kind of person who has already been able to perpetually sever the three fetters — the view of the transitory collection, the clinging to precepts-and-observances, and doubt — has gained the fruit of stream-entry, and has become one of "the dharma of not-falling" (one who will surely never fall into an evil destiny), determinedly heading toward awakening. He takes birth, going and coming among gods and humans, at most seven times over, and then realizes the limit of suffering (the exhaustion of suffering). This is named the person who has at most seven returns of existence.

18. The person who is "household-to-household": there are two kinds of household-to-household. First, god-household-to-household; second, human-household-to-household. God-household-to-household is one who, in the heavens, is reborn from one household into another household, now going, now coming, and realizes the limit of suffering; human-household-to-household is one who, among humans, is reborn from one household into another household, now going, now coming, and realizes the limit of suffering. It should be known that both of these are stream-enterer persons (ones in the stream-entry station who are nearing the once-returner).

19. The person of a single interval: that is, that once-returner person who, coursing in the coursing toward the fruit of non-returning, has already been able to perpetually sever the superior-grade and middling-grade afflictions of the desire realm, with only the lower grade remaining; needing only to undergo one further existence among the gods of the desire realm, he there reaches parinirvāṇa, and no longer returns to be born in this world. "A single interval" means separated by but a single [life]. This is named the person of a single interval.

20. The person who reaches parinirvāṇa in the interim: there are three kinds of person who reach parinirvāṇa in the interim (all of whom reach parinirvāṇa in the "intermediate existence" station).  First, there is a kind: after his life ends here, the intermediate existence continues to arise; the moment the intermediate existence arises, he at once reaches parinirvāṇa. Just like a tiny sliver of kindling-fire, whose faint spark has barely leapt up when it thereupon dies away.  Second, there is a kind: after his life ends here, the intermediate existence continues to arise; after the intermediate existence has arisen, it pauses a little while, and, not yet having headed toward the "existence-of-birth," he reaches parinirvāṇa. Just like a lump-ingot of red-hot iron, blazing and glowing crimson, from which, when it is struck with the hammer, sparks flow forth — the sparks die out before they have fallen.  Third, there is a kind: after his life ends here, the intermediate existence continues to arise; after the intermediate existence has arisen, it has already headed toward the existence-of-birth, but, not yet having gained the existence-of-birth, he reaches parinirvāṇa. Just like that hot iron, from which, when it is beaten, sparks flow forth — the sparks fall, and, before they have reached the ground, they thereupon die away.  These three kinds of person who reach parinirvāṇa in the interim are, taken all together, spoken of as one single kind, "the person who reaches parinirvāṇa in the interim."

21. The person who reaches parinirvāṇa upon being born: that is, one who, the very moment he is born into that (form-realm) place, thereupon reaches parinirvāṇa. This is named the person who reaches parinirvāṇa upon being born.

22. The person who reaches parinirvāṇa without exertion: that is, one who, after being born into that place, need not further rouse preparatory effort, does not apply exertion, and undergoes no toil — the noble path becomes manifest of itself and he reaches parinirvāṇa. This is named the person who reaches parinirvāṇa without exertion.

23. The person who reaches parinirvāṇa with exertion: that is, one who, after being born into that place, must rouse preparatory effort, apply great exertion, and pass through extreme toil — only then does the noble path become manifest and he reaches parinirvāṇa. This is named the person who reaches parinirvāṇa with exertion.

24. The person who flows upward: that is, there is a kind of non-returner person who, from here rising to be born into the first meditative absorption, abides there and does not reach parinirvāṇa; from there his life ends, and he again, by turns, rises to be born into each of the further, higher places of birth, up to — either reaching the Highest-of-Form Heaven, or reaching the station of neither-perception-nor-non-perception (only there reaching parinirvāṇa). "Flowing upward" means flowing-and-turning ever upward. This is named the person who flows upward.

25. The person liberated at [certain] times: that is, there is a kind of person who is of dull-faculty lineage, who, with respect to the "abiding in the pleasant state within the present dharma" (the pleasures of the various meditative concentrations) in the world, may possibly regress; or, contemplating self-harm, or guarding his liberation, he rouses himself to diligent cultivation of the practice of non-heedlessness — for the sake of guarding against regression, either abiding merely in the wholesome portion of his own share, or, through a single day and a single night, through instants, moments, and brief spans, striving to advance to the superior, yet still not having realized the utmost, most sharp [non-regression]. "Liberated at times" means that he must await the [right] time and await conditions before he can gain liberation. This is named the person liberated at [certain] times.

26. The person of the unshakable dharma: that is, there is a kind of person who is the opposite of the above (the one liberated at times) — of sharp faculties, and with respect to the abiding in the pleasant state within the present dharma he definitely does not regress; it should be known that this is named the person of the unshakable dharma.

27. The person liberated by wisdom: that is, there is a kind of person who has already been able to realize the perpetual exhaustion of the outflows, but who, with respect to the eight liberations, has not yet been able to bear witness with the body and abide in them in full measure (he has severed only the affliction-obstruction, and has not gained the attainment of cessation). This is named the person liberated by wisdom.

28. The person liberated in both parts: that is, there is a kind of person who has already been able to realize the perpetual exhaustion of the outflows, and who, moreover, with respect to the eight liberations, has already borne witness with the body and abides in them in full measure — with respect to both parts, "the part that is the affliction-obstruction" and "the part that is the liberation-obstruction (the obstruction to meditative attainment)," his mind has gained liberation. Therefore he is named the person liberated in both parts.

Two · The Establishment of the Person by Eleven Differentiating Principles

How is the person established? That is, by eleven differentiating principles it should be known that the person is established. Which eleven differentiating principles? First, the differentiation of faculties; second, the differentiation of assembly; third, the differentiation of practice; fourth, the differentiation of vow; fifth, the differentiation of the mode of coursing; sixth, the differentiation of path-and-fruit; seventh, the differentiation of preparatory effort; eighth, the differentiation of concentration; ninth, the differentiation of birth; tenth, the differentiation of regression and non-regression; eleventh, the differentiation of obstruction.

(1) Establishment by the differentiation of faculties: by the differentiation of the faculties, two kinds of person are established — first, one of dull faculties; second, one of sharp faculties.

(2) Establishment by the differentiation of assembly: by the differentiation of the assembly (one's status within the Saṅgha), seven kinds of person are established — the bhikṣu, the bhikṣuṇī, the śikṣamāṇā (the probationary female trainee), the toil-diligent male (the śrāmaṇera), the toil-diligent female (the śrāmaṇerikā), the male who serves-in-proximity (the upāsaka), and the female who serves-in-proximity (the upāsikā).

(3) Establishment by the differentiation of practice: by the differentiation of practice (one's habitual disposition of affliction), seven kinds of person are established — one in whom craving is predominant is named a "craving-practitioner," one in whom hatred is predominant is named a "hatred-practitioner," one in whom delusion is predominant is named a "delusion-practitioner," one in whom conceit is predominant is named a "conceit-practitioner," one in whom discursive thought is predominant is named a "discursive-thought-practitioner," one who has attained the even balance is named an "even-portion practitioner," and one of thin dust-nature is named a "thin-dust practitioner."

Question: By what mark should the craving-practitioner person be known? Answer: The craving-practitioner person, even toward those slight and inferior things that are craved, is yet able to give rise to the utmost, thick-and-heavy, superior-grade enwrapment of craving — how much more so toward middling-grade and superior-grade objects. And this enwrapment of craving abides within his body, continuing over a long time, binding him along for a long span. Because of the enwrapment of craving, he is subdued by the lovable dharma, yet is not able to subdue that lovable dharma. His faculties are glad-and-cheerful; his faculties are not rigid; his faculties are not harsh; his faculties are not coarse; by nature he does not delight in using evil bodily and verbal deeds to injure and vex others; he is hard to make leave [what he craves], hard to make weary of it; his resolute conviction is low and inferior; the tasks he undertakes are firm and long-enduring, his precepts firm and long-enduring, and he is able to endure and able to bear. Toward the goods of livelihood he is by nature deeply attached, giving rise to deep craving and esteem, with much delight and much cheer; he keeps far from frowning (does not knit his brow), with relaxed countenance and level gaze, smiling and speaking first. By such classes as these, it should be known, this is named the mark of the craving-practitioner.

Question: By what mark should the hatred-practitioner person be known? Answer: The hatred-practitioner person, even toward those slight and inferior things that are hated, is yet able to give rise to the utmost, thick-and-heavy, superior-grade enwrapment of hatred — how much more so toward middling-grade and superior-grade objects. This enwrapment of hatred abides within his body, continuing over a long time, binding him along for a long span. By this enwrapment of hatred, he is subdued by the hateful dharma, and is not able to subdue that hateful dharma. His faculties are withered-and-dry; his faculties are rigid; his faculties are rough-and-harsh; his faculties are coarse-and-parched; by nature he is fond of using evil bodily and verbal deeds to injure and vex others; he is easy to make leave, easy to make weary; he is fierce-and-violent, harsh of mouth, his features angular (severe-and-cutting); he has not much resolute conviction; the tasks he undertakes are not firm, not solid, his precepts not firm, not solid; he does not endure, does not bear; he has much worry and much distress, by nature fond of going against, taking things unaccommodatingly, by nature much given to grief-and-sorrow, by nature fond of coarse speech, harboring much resentment and hatred, his disposition savage-and-cruel, extremely perverse-and-malicious, fond of standing in mutual opposition; getting from another only a few words, he grows greatly incensed and greatly wrathful, abiding haggard-and-wan, prone to giving rise to fury, his brow and face knitted-and-frowning, never with a relaxed countenance, looking askance and downward, and toward others' glory and gain much given to hatred and much given to envy. By such classes as these, it should be known, this is named the mark of the hatred-practitioner.

Question: By what mark should the delusion-practitioner person be known? Answer: The delusion-practitioner person, even toward those slight and inferior things about which he is deluded, is yet able to give rise to the utmost, thick-and-heavy, superior-grade enwrapment of delusion — how much more so toward middling-grade and superior-grade objects. This enwrapment of delusion abides within his body, continuing over a long time, binding him along for a long span. By this enwrapment of delusion, he is subdued by the delusion-inducing dharma, and is not able to subdue that delusion-inducing dharma. His faculties are dim-and-dull; his faculties are stupid-and-benighted; his faculties are frail-and-weak; his bodily deeds are slow, his verbal deeds are slow; what he thinks is ill thought, what he says is ill said, what he does is ill done; he is lazy-and-slack, and does not bring the tasks he starts to completion; his eloquence in speech is thin-and-weak, his nature not sharp-and-quick, his mindfulness much given to forgetting-and-losing, and in his abiding he lacks correct knowing; what he takes up is slanted-and-wrong (crooked-and-perverse); he is hard to make leave, hard to make weary; his resolute conviction is low and inferior; he is dull-and-stupid, mute-and-dumb, using his hands in place of speech; he has no ability to comprehend the meaning of dharmas well-spoken or ill-spoken; he is entangled-and-bound by the object, drawn-and-plundered by others, dispatched-and-ordered about by others. By such classes as these, it should be known, this is named the mark of the delusion-practitioner.

Question: By what mark should the conceit-practitioner person be known? Answer: The conceit-practitioner person, even toward those slight and inferior things about which he is conceited, is yet able to give rise to the utmost, thick-and-heavy, superior-grade enwrapment of conceit — how much more so toward middling-grade and superior-grade objects. This enwrapment of conceit abides within his body, continuing over a long time, binding him along for a long span. Because of the enwrapment of conceit, he is subdued by the conceit-inducing dharma, and is not able to subdue that conceit-inducing dharma. His faculties are agitated-and-stirring; his faculties are held-high; his faculties are scattered-and-distracted; he is diligent in taking delight in adorning his own body, lofty and grand in speech, taking no pleasure in humbling himself; toward his parents, his kin, and his teachers-and-elders he is not able, time and again, to serve them in accord with the dharma; he harbors much haughtiness-and-pride, unwilling with his body to pay homage, to inquire after, to join palms, to go out to meet, or to perform the deeds of harmony-and-reverence; he exalts and raises himself, slighting and belittling others. He takes delight in gains-and-support, delights in respect-and-honor, delights in the worldly praise-and-acclaim of reputation-and-eulogy; what he does is flighty-and-frivolous, and he is fond of making mockery, teasing, and jest; he is hard to make leave, hard to make weary; his resolute conviction is broad-and-vast; his loving-kindness and compassion are slight and inferior; he reckons-and-clings to the views of "a self, a sentient being, one who lives, one who is nourished, a person, one who is born," and the rest, for the most part belonging to the superior grade; he has much enmity and much hatred. By such classes as these, it should be known, this is named the mark of the conceit-practitioner.

Question: By what mark should the discursive-thought-practitioner person be known? Answer: The discursive-thought-practitioner person, even toward those slight and inferior things that are discursively thought about, is yet able to rouse the utmost thick-and-heavy, superior-grade enwrapment of discursive thought — how much more so toward middling-grade and superior-grade objects. This enwrapment of discursive thought abides within his body, continuing over a long time, binding him along for a long span. Because of this enwrapment, he is subdued by the dharma that is discursively thought about, and is not able to subdue that dharma discursively thought about. His faculties do not stay put; his faculties are drifting-and-flighty; his faculties are agitated-and-stirring; his faculties are scattered-and-distracted; his bodily deeds are mistaken-and-erring, his verbal deeds mistaken-and-erring; he is hard to make leave, hard to make weary; he is fond of idle proliferation, delighting in idle proliferation; he has much bewilderment, much doubt, and harbors much wishful desire; his precepts are not firm, not settled, his tasks not firm, not settled; he harbors much dread-and-anxiety, his mindfulness much given to forgetting-and-losing, taking no delight in seclusion, much delighting in scattered-agitation; toward the world's various fine matters he goes drifting and turning along with craving and desire; and yet he is briskly diligent without slackness, bringing to completion the tasks he starts (his energy vigorous yet hard to rein in). By such classes as these, it should be known, this is named the mark of the discursive-thought-practitioner.

The above is what is named "the establishment of the person by the differentiation of practice."

(4) Establishment by the differentiation of vow: there may be a person who has already made the right vow in the śrāvaka vehicle, or has already made the right vow in the pratyekabuddha vehicle, or has already made the right vow in the Great Vehicle. It should be known that, among these — if a person has already made the right vow in the śrāvaka vehicle, he may be of the śrāvaka lineage, or of the pratyekabuddha lineage, or of the Great-Vehicle lineage; if he has already made the right vow toward pratyekabuddha awakening, he may be of the pratyekabuddha lineage, or of the śrāvaka lineage, or of the Great-Vehicle lineage; if he has already made the right vow in the Great Vehicle, he may be of the Great-Vehicle lineage, or of the pratyekabuddha lineage, or of the śrāvaka lineage (vow and lineage do not necessarily match). But if a person of the śrāvaka lineage has already made the right vow toward pratyekabuddha awakening, or toward unsurpassed perfect awakening — being of the śrāvaka lineage, he will later determinedly still cast off that vow, and will in the end surely abide only in the śrāvaka-vehicle vow; and it should be known that it is likewise for the person of the pratyekabuddha-vehicle lineage and of the Great-Vehicle lineage. Therefore, among these, for all these persons, the "vow" can be shifted and can be cast off, but the "lineage" is determinedly unable to be shifted, unable to be cast off. In the present sense here, it should be known that only the person "who has already made the right vow in the śrāvaka vehicle, and is of the śrāvaka lineage" is being spoken of. This is named the establishment of the person by the differentiation of vow.

(5) Establishment by the differentiation of the mode of coursing: as with the persons raised and shown before, they gain departure by relying on four modes of coursing. Which four? A mode of coursing may be "painful-and-slow in penetration," or "painful-and-swift in penetration," or "pleasant-and-slow in penetration," or "pleasant-and-swift in penetration." It should be known that, among these: if a person of dull-faculty nature has not yet gained a root meditative absorption (cultivating by relying only on the access-concentration and the like), all his modes of coursing are named "painful-and-slow in penetration" (painful to work at, and slow in penetration); if of sharp-faculty nature but not yet having gained a root meditative absorption, it is named "painful-and-swift in penetration" (painful yet swift); if of dull-faculty nature but having already gained a root meditative absorption, it is named "pleasant-and-slow in penetration" (pleasant yet slow); if of sharp-faculty nature and having already gained a root meditative absorption, it is named "pleasant-and-swift in penetration" (pleasant yet swift). This is named the establishment of the person by the differentiation of the mode of coursing.

(6) Establishment by the differentiation of path-and-fruit: that is, the "coursing along the four coursings-toward" and the "abiding in the four fruits." Those coursing along the four coursings-toward: first, the coursing toward the fruit of stream-entry; second, the coursing toward the fruit of once-returning; third, the coursing toward the fruit of non-returning; fourth, the person coursing toward the fruit of arhatship. Those abiding in the four fruits: first, the fruit of stream-entry; second, the fruit of once-returning; third, the fruit of non-returning; fourth, the fruit of arhatship. Those who turn upon the path of coursing-toward are named "ones coursing toward," and by the path of coursing-toward four kinds of person are established; those who have already gained a śramaṇa-fruit are named "ones abiding in a fruit," and by the path-and-fruit four kinds of person are established. This is named the establishment of the person by the differentiation of path-and-fruit.

(7) Establishment by the differentiation of preparatory effort: that is, the person who practices by following through faith and the person who practices by following the dharma. If, following after the faith of a person (another), he diligently cultivates right practice, he is named the person who practices by following through faith; if, toward the dharmas, not awaiting another's condition, following the vinaya (the discipline / rule), he diligently cultivates right practice, he is named the person who practices by following the dharma. This is named the establishment of the person by the differentiation of preparatory effort.

(8) Establishment by the differentiation of concentration: that is, the body-witness person, who, with respect to the eight liberations, has already borne witness with the body and abides in them in full measure, yet has not yet obtained the perpetual exhaustion of the outflows. It should be known that this kind of person, with respect to the eight liberations — "the liberation of one who, possessing form, contemplates forms; the liberation of one who, being inwardly without perception of form, contemplates outward forms; the liberation of the pure, borne witness with the body, abided in in full measure; the liberation of the station of boundless space; the liberation of the station of boundless consciousness; the liberation of the station of nothing-whatever; the liberation of the station of neither-perception-nor-non-perception; the liberation of the cessation of perception-and-feeling" — has already been able to enter and emerge, in forward and reverse order, at will. This is named the establishment of the person by the differentiation of concentration.

(9) Establishment by the differentiation of birth: that is, the person who has at most seven returns of existence, the household-to-household one, the one of a single interval, the one who reaches parinirvāṇa in the interim, the one who reaches parinirvāṇa upon being born, the one who reaches parinirvāṇa without exertion, the one who reaches parinirvāṇa with exertion, and the one who flows upward (all of them established by the mark of the differences in their "undergoing of birth"). This is named the establishment of the person by the differentiation of birth.

(10) Establishment by the differentiation of regression and non-regression: by "regression," the arhat liberated at times is established — he, with respect to the abiding in the pleasant state within the present dharma, may possibly regress; by "non-regression," the arhat of the unshakable dharma is established — he, with respect to the abiding in the pleasant state within the present dharma, definitely does not regress. This is named the establishment of the person by the differentiation of regression and non-regression.

(11) Establishment by the differentiation of obstruction: that is, the arhat liberated by wisdom and the arhat liberated in both parts. The arhat liberated by wisdom is one who has already been liberated from the affliction-obstruction, but not yet liberated from the concentration-obstruction; the arhat liberated in both parts is one who has already been liberated from the affliction-obstruction, and has also already been liberated from the concentration-obstruction, and therefore is spoken of by the name "liberated in both parts." This is named the establishment of the person by the differentiation of obstruction.

By the various differentiating principles raised and shown above, in their proper sequence, it should be known that the person is established in just this way.

聲聞地 · 第二瑜伽處 · 所緣 · 遍滿+淨行The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · Second Yoga-Station · Objects · Pervasive and Conduct-Purifying

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

第二瑜伽處第三目「所緣」。先標四種所緣(遍滿·淨行·善巧·淨惑),本子說頭兩種:遍滿所緣(一切觀行通用的四種影像,附《頡隸伐多經》)與淨行所緣——也就是對治五種行性的「五停心觀」(不淨治貪·慈愍治瞋·緣性緣起治癡·界差別治慢·阿那波那念治尋思)。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

所緣總綱:四種所緣境事

什麼是所緣?就是有四種所緣境事。哪四種?一、遍滿所緣境事,二、淨行所緣境事,三、善巧所緣境事,四、淨惑所緣境事。〔本子說前二,善巧·淨惑見 13-02-03。〕

一、遍滿所緣(一切觀行通用的四種影像)

什麼是遍滿所緣境事?又有四種:一、有分別影像,二、無分別影像,三、事邊際性,四、所作成辦。

(一)有分別影像:什麼是有分別影像?就是有一種人,以聽聞正法、或受到教授教誡為依止,由見、由聞、由分別,對於「所知事的同分影像」,憑三摩呬多地(等引地·定地)的毗鉢舍那(觀)去觀察、簡擇、極簡擇、遍尋思、遍伺察。

這裡的「所知事」是什麼?就是:或不淨、或慈愍、或緣性緣起、或界差別、或阿那波那念,或蘊善巧、或界善巧、或處善巧、或緣起善巧、或處非處善巧,或下地的麁性、上地的靜性,或苦諦、集諦、滅諦、道諦。這些就名為所知事。

這所知事,憑教授教誡、或聽聞正法為依止,令定地的作意現前,就對那法起勝解、對那所知事起勝解。他這時對所知事,便如同正在親領受般、帶著勝解而轉。雖然那所知事並不是真的當前領受、和合現前,也不是別的同類之物,然而由定地的勝解,領受到一個「相似的作意」、領受到那所知事的「相似顯現」。由這道理,名為「所知事同分影像」。修觀行的人,推求這影像,便在那本性所知事中觀察、審定它的功德與過失。這就名為有分別影像。

(二)無分別影像:什麼是無分別影像?就是修觀行的人,取得這影像相之後,不再去觀察、簡擇、極簡擇、遍尋思、遍伺察,而只對這所緣影像,以奢摩他(止)行寂靜其心——也就是用九種行相令心安住:令心內住、等住、安住、近住、調伏、寂靜、最極寂靜、一趣、等持〔九住心〕。他這時便成就「無分別影像」所緣:對這所緣影像,一向一趣安住其念,不再觀察簡擇尋伺。這就名為無分別影像。

這個影像,也名影像、也名三摩地相、也名三摩地所行境界、也名三摩地口、也名三摩地門、也名作意處、也名內分別體、也名光影——這些都是「所知事同分影像」的種種異名。

(三)事邊際性:什麼是事邊際性?就是所緣的「盡所有性」與「如所有性」。什麼是盡所有性?就是色蘊之外更無餘色,受想行識蘊之外更無餘受想行識;一切有為事都被五法(色受想行識)所攝,一切諸法都被界、處所攝,一切所知事都被四聖諦所攝——這名為盡所有性(窮盡事相之量)。什麼是如所有性?就是所緣的真實性、真如性,由四道理(觀待·作用·證成·法爾)而具道理性——這名為如所有性(事相的真實本性)。所緣的盡所有性與如所有性,總說為一個「事邊際性」。

(四)所作成辦:什麼是所作成辦?就是修觀行的人,對奢摩他、毗鉢舍那若修、若習、若多修習,以此為因緣,種種緣影像的作意都得圓滿;由於作意圓滿,便得「轉依」,一切麁重(身心粗濁的種子)悉皆息滅;由於已得轉依,便「超過影像」——直接對所知事,生起無分別的現量智見。入初靜慮者,得初靜慮時,就在初靜慮所行境界生起這智見;入第二靜慮者,得第二靜慮時,就在第二靜慮所行境界生起這智見;入第三靜慮者,得第三靜慮時,就在第三靜慮所行境界生起這智見;入第四靜慮者,得第四靜慮時,就在第四靜慮所行境界生起這智見。入空無邊處者,得彼定時,就在空無邊處定所行境界生起這智見;入識無邊處者,得彼定時,就在識無邊處定所行境界生起這智見;入無所有處者,得彼定時,就在無所有處定所行境界生起這智見;入非想非非想處者,得彼定時,就在非想非非想處定所行境界生起這智見。這就名為所作成辦。

為何名「遍滿」:這四種所緣境事,遍行一切、隨入一切所緣境中,是過去、未來、現在的正等覺者共同宣說的,所以名遍滿所緣。又這所緣遍於毗鉢舍那品、遍於奢摩他品、遍於一切事、遍於真實事、遍於因果相屬事,所以名為遍滿。若說有分別影像,就是這裡所說的毗鉢舍那品;若說無分別影像,就是這裡所說的奢摩他品;若說事邊際性,就是這裡所說的一切事與真實事;若說所作成辦,就是這裡所說的因果相屬事。

附《頡隸伐多經》:如世尊曾為長老頡隸伐多說此義。曾聞長老頡隸伐多問世尊:「大德!諸有比丘勤修觀行、是瑜伽師,能於所緣安住其心。他為何於緣安住其心?怎樣於緣安住其心?到什麼程度才名心善安住?」佛讚許:「善哉善哉!你能問這義,今諦聽善思,我為你宣說。」

佛說:頡隸伐多!諸修觀行的瑜伽師能於所緣安住其心,他或樂淨行、或樂善巧、或樂令心解脫諸漏,於「相稱緣」安住其心、於「相似緣」安住其心、於「緣無倒」安住其心,並能於其中不捨靜慮。

——什麼是「於相稱緣安住其心」?就是那比丘若唯有貪行,應於不淨緣安住其心;若唯有瞋行,應於慈愍安住其心;若唯有癡行,應於緣性緣起安住其心;若唯有慢行,應於界差別安住其心;若唯有尋思行,應於阿那波那念安住其心〔五停心對五行〕。又若愚於諸行自相、愚於「我·有情·命者·生者·能養育者·補特伽羅」事,應於蘊善巧安住其心;若愚其因,於界善巧;若愚其緣,於處善巧;若愚無常苦空無我,於緣起、處非處善巧;若樂離欲界欲,於諸欲麁性、諸色靜性安住其心;若樂離色界欲,於諸色麁性、無色靜性;若樂通達及解脫遍一切處的薩迦耶事,於苦集滅道四諦安住其心。這就名為於相稱緣安住其心(藥對病)。

——什麼是「於相似緣安住其心」?就是那比丘為了簡擇、極簡擇、遍尋思、遍伺察那所知事,於先前所見、所聞、所覺、所知之事,憑見聞覺知的增上力,以定地作意思惟分別而起勝解;雖不能把本所知事和合現前觀察,卻能生起與本事相似之相,對那所緣有相似的「唯智、唯見、唯正憶念」;又於時時間令心寂靜,於時時間依增上慧的法毗鉢舍那勤修觀行。這名為於相似緣安住其心(緣影像而非緣本事)。

——什麼是「於緣無倒安住其心」?就是那瑜伽師於所緣境安住其心,隨所應而解了所知境界,如實無倒地遍了知。這名為於緣無倒安住其心。

——什麼是「能於其中不捨靜慮」?就是那瑜伽師如是於緣正修行時,以無間加行、殷重加行,於時時間修習「止相、舉相、捨相」;由修習、多修習為因緣,一切麁重悉皆息滅,隨而觸證「所依清淨」;於所知事由現見故,觸證「所緣清淨」;由離貪故,觸證「心遍清淨」;離無明故,觸證「智遍清淨」。這名為能於其中不捨靜慮。頡隸伐多!這比丘如是於所緣境安住其心、如是安住心已,名為善安住。

世尊於此重說一頌:「行者行諸相,知一切實義,常於影靜慮,得證遍清淨。」——「行者行諸相」說的是於止、舉、捨相無間殷重修行;「知一切實義」說的是事邊際性;「常於影靜慮」說的是有分別影像、無分別影像;「得證遍清淨」說的是所作成辦。世尊又說一頌:「於心相遍知,能受遠離味;靜慮常委念,受喜樂離染。」——「於心相遍知」謂以「心相」之名說有分別、無分別影像,以「遍知」之名說事邊際性;「能受遠離味」說的是於所緣樂斷樂修;「靜慮常委念」說的是於止觀常勤修習、委練(細密熟練)修習;「受喜樂離染」說的是所作成辦。應知這樣的遍滿所緣,隨順淨教、契合正理。這就名為遍滿所緣。

二、淨行所緣(五停心觀)

什麼名為淨行所緣?就是不淨、慈愍、緣性緣起、界差別、阿那波那念等所緣的差別。

(一)不淨所緣——對治貪行

什麼是不淨所緣?就是略說有六種不淨:一、朽穢不淨,二、苦惱不淨,三、下劣不淨,四、觀待不淨,五、煩惱不淨,六、速壞不淨。

什麼叫作朽穢不淨?這種不淨略依二種而說:一、依內,二、依外。什麼是依內朽穢不淨?就是這身中的髮、毛、爪、齒、塵、垢、皮、肉、骸、骨、筋、脈、心、膽、肝、肺、大腸、小腸、生藏、熟藏、肚、胃、脾、腎、膿、血、熱痰、肪、膏、肌、髓、腦、膜、鼻涕、唾液、淚、汗、屎、尿。這些同類事物,名為依內朽穢不淨。什麼是依外朽穢不淨?就是或青瘀、或膿爛、或變壞、或膖脹、或被食噉、或變赤、或散壞、或骨、或骨鎖、或骨與骨鎖、或由屎所成、或由尿所成、或由唾液所成、或由鼻涕所成、或被血塗污、或被膿塗污、或大小便的污穢處。這些同類事物,名為依外朽穢不淨。依內與依外的朽穢不淨,總合說為一種朽穢不淨。

什麼叫作苦惱不淨?就是以隨順苦受的觸為緣,所生起的身體或心理不平等感受;它屬於受蘊所攝。這就名為苦惱不淨。

什麼叫作下劣不淨?就是最下劣的事、最下劣的界,也就是欲界。除了欲界以外,再也找不到更下、更劣、更為鄙穢的其餘界。這就名為下劣不淨。

什麼叫作觀待不淨?就是一種較劣的清淨事,與其餘更殊勝的清淨事相對時,便顯得不淨。例如,與無色界的殊勝清淨事相對時,色界諸法便顯得不淨;與薩迦耶寂滅的涅槃相對時,從欲界直到有頂都顯得不淨。這些同類情形,一切都名為觀待不淨。

什麼叫作煩惱不淨?就是三界之中所有的一切結、縛、隨眠、隨煩惱與纏,這一切都名為煩惱不淨。

什麼叫作速壞不淨?就是五取蘊具有無常、無恒、不可保信、終必變壞的法性。這就名為速壞不淨。

這樣的六種不淨,為什麼是能使「貪行」清淨的所緣?因為貪有五種:一、於內身的「欲欲欲貪」,二、於外身的「婬欲婬貪」,三、境欲境貪,四、色欲色貪,五、薩迦耶欲薩迦耶貪——這名五貪。為令這五種欲貪斷滅、除遣、不現行,便建立六種不淨所緣:  由依內朽穢不淨所緣,令對內身的欲欲欲貪,心得清淨。  由依外朽穢不淨所緣,令對外身的婬欲婬貪,心得清淨。婬相應貪又有四種:一、顯色貪,二、形色貪,三、妙觸貪,四、承事貪;由依四種「外不淨所緣」,對這四種婬貪令心清淨——若於青瘀、膿爛、變壞、膖脹、食噉作意思惟,對「顯色貪」令心清淨;若於變赤作意思惟,對「形色貪」令心清淨;若於骨、鎖、骨鎖作意思惟,對「妙觸貪」令心清淨;若於散壞作意思惟,對「承事貪」令心清淨。這四種名為對婬貪令心清淨。

是故世尊就「依外朽穢不淨」的種種差別,都依四種「憺怕路」(屍陀林·停屍處)而建立:  若說「由憺怕路見諸屍,死經一日、二日、乃至七日,被烏鵲、餓狗、鵄鷲、狐狼、野干、禽獸所食噉,便取其相,以譬自身亦如是性、如是類,不能超過如是法性」——這顯示從青瘀乃至食噉。  若說「由憺怕路見諸屍,離皮肉血、筋脈纏裹」——這顯示變赤。  若說「由憺怕路見諸骨,或骨、或鎖」——這顯示骨、鎖、骨鎖。  若說「由憺怕路見諸骨,手骨、足骨、臗骨、膝骨、臂骨、肘骨、脊骨、髆骨、肋骨、頷輪、齒鬘、頂髑髏等各各分散,或經一年二三乃至七年,其色鮮白猶如螺貝、或如鴿色,或見彼骨和雜塵土」——這顯示散壞。

如此依外的朽穢不淨所緣,令對四種婬相應貪心得清淨;由苦惱、下劣二不淨所緣,令對「境相應」的欲貪心得清淨;由觀待不淨所緣,令對「色相應」的欲貪心得清淨;由煩惱、速壞二不淨所緣,令對「從欲界乃至有頂諸薩迦耶」的欲貪心得清淨。這名為貪行的淨行所緣——以上且就「能淨貪行」,總說一切通治所攝的不淨所緣。今此義中,本意唯取「朽穢不淨」(其餘五種不淨,也分別是其餘淨行所緣所攝)。

(二)慈愍所緣——對治瞋行

什麼是慈愍所緣?就是對親品、或怨品、或中品,平等安住「利益意樂」(願其得益之心),能引下中上品快樂的定地勝解。當知這裡:親品、怨品、中品三者是「所緣」;利益意樂、能引快樂的定地勝解是「能緣」;所緣、能緣總略為一,名慈愍所緣。

若經說「慈俱心」,這即顯示對親怨中三品所緣的利益意樂。若說「無怨、無敵、無損害」,這顯示利益意樂的三種相:由無怨故名增上利益意樂,此無怨性由「無敵對」(不欲相違諍)與「無損惱」(不欲不饒益)二句所顯。若說「廣大無量」,這顯示能引下中上品快樂——欲界快樂名「廣」,初二靜慮地快樂名「大」,第三靜慮地快樂名「無量」。若說「勝解遍滿具足住」,這顯示能引快樂的定地勝解,此勝解即是能引快樂利益增上意樂所攝的勝解作意俱行。若對「無苦無樂」的親怨中三品有情平等欲與其樂,當知是「慈」;若對「有苦、有樂」的三品有情平等欲拔其苦、欲慶其樂,當知是「悲、是喜」——有苦有情是悲所緣,有樂有情是喜所緣。這名慈愍所緣。若有瞋行補特伽羅,於諸有情修習慈愍,令瞋微薄,名於瞋恚心得清淨。

〔本地分中聲聞地第十三第二瑜伽處之二〕

(三)緣性緣起所緣——對治癡行

什麼是緣性緣起所緣?就是於三世唯行、唯法、唯事、唯因、唯果,墮入正道理——也就是觀待道理、作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理(四道理):唯有諸法能引諸法,無有作者、也無受者。這名緣性緣起所緣。對這所緣作意思惟,癡行增上補特伽羅的一切癡行皆得微薄,於諸癡行心得清淨。這就名為緣性緣起所緣。

(四)界差別所緣——對治慢行

什麼是界差別所緣?就是六界差別:一、地界,二、水界,三、火界,四、風界,五、空界,六、識界。

什麼是地界?地界有二:一、內地界,二、外地界。內地界,是這身體內部各別的堅實性;它屬於堅硬,也屬於地大,與身體親附而為身心所執取。內地界具體是什麼?就是髮、毛、爪、齒、塵垢、皮、肉、骸骨、筋、脈、肝、膽、心、肺、脾、腎、肚、胃、大腸、小腸、生藏、熟藏,以及糞穢等,這些名為內地界。外地界,是外在的堅實性;它屬於堅硬,也屬於地大,不與身體親附,也不為身心所執取。外地界具體是什麼?就是瓦、木、土塊、砂礫、樹木、石頭、山、巖等,這些名為外地界。

什麼是水界?水界有二:一、內水界,二、外水界。內水界,是這身體內部各別的濕潤性;它屬於濕潤,也屬於水大,與身體親附而為身心所執取。內水界具體是什麼?就是淚、汗、鼻涕、唾液、肪、膏、脂、髓、熱痰、膿血、腦、膜、尿等,這些名為內水界。外水界,是外在的濕潤性;它屬於濕潤,也屬於水大,不與身體親附,也不為身心所執取。外水界具體是什麼?就是井、泉、池、沼、陂、湖、河、海等,這些名為外水界。

什麼是火界?火界有二:一、內火界,二、外火界。內火界,是這身體內部各別的溫熱性;它屬於溫熱,也屬於煖性,與身體親附而為身心所執取。內火界具體是什麼?就是身體中所有的溫煖,能使身體發熱、均勻發熱、周遍發熱;由於這種溫煖,所吃、所喝、所嚼、所嘗的飲食容易正常消化變化;它若增盛,便歸入蒸熱一類。這些名為內火界。外火界,是外在的溫熱性;它屬於溫熱,也屬於煖性,不與身體親附,也不為身心所執取。外火界具體是什麼?就是人間依鑽燧、牛糞末等求得的火;火生起以後,能燒牛糞、草、薪、榛叢、曠野、山、洲渚、村落或村落的一部分、城市或城市的一部分、國土或國土的一部分,以及其餘同類事物。這些名為外火界。

什麼是風界?風界有二:一、內風界,二、外風界。內風界,是這身體內部各別的風性;它屬於風吹飄動,具有輕性與動性,與身體親附而為身心所執取。內風界具體是什麼?就是身中有上行風、下行風、脇臥風、脊臥風、腰間風、臗間風、小刀風、大刀風、針刺風、畢鉢羅風、入出息風、隨支節風。這些名為內風界。外風界,是外在的風性;它屬於風吹飄動,具有輕性與動性,不與身體親附,也不為身心所執取。外風界具體是什麼?就是身外的東來風、西來風、南來風、北來風、有塵風、無塵風、狹小風、廣大風、毘濕婆風、吠藍婆風、風輪風。有時大風突然生起而聚集,折斷樹木、吹倒牆壁、崩壞山岳、激盪大海;吹動過後,它無所依憑,自然止息。若有情想要得風,便抖動衣服、搖扇,或搖動多羅樹葉。這些名為外風界。

什麼是空界?就是眼、耳、鼻、口、咽喉等處所有的孔穴;由這些孔穴吞咽,在這些孔穴中吞咽,吞咽以後,又由這些孔穴向下漏泄。這些同類的孔穴,名為空界。

什麼是識界?就是眼識、耳識、鼻識、舌識、身識、意識;又有心、意、識三種差別。這就名為識界。

若諸慢行補特伽羅,於界差別作意思惟,便於身中離開「一合想」(把身當作渾然一體之想),得「不淨想」,無復高舉,憍慢微薄,於諸慢行心得清淨。這名慢行補特伽羅由界差別的淨行所緣。

(五)阿那波那念所緣——對治尋思行

什麼是阿那波那念所緣?就是緣入息、出息的念,名阿那波那念;此念所緣的入出息等,名阿那波那念所緣。

當知這裡,入息有二。哪二種?一、入息,二、中間入息。什麼是入息?就是出息之後沒有間隔,風從內門轉入,一直到臍處。什麼是中間入息?就是入息已滅、出息還未生起時,在兩者中間的停息處,暫時生起彷彿是氣息的微細風,這名中間入息。

出息也有二。哪二種?一、出息,二、中間出息。它們的情形如同入息與中間入息;差別在於,出息是入息之後沒有間隔,風從外門轉出,從臍處開始,一直到面門,或到鼻端,或再出到身外。中間出息,則是出息已滅、入息還未生起時,在中間停息處暫時生起的微細風。

入息、出息有二種因緣。哪二種?一、牽引業,二、臍處的孔穴,或上半身所有的孔穴。

入息、出息有二種所依。哪二種?一、身,二、心。為什麼?因為必須依身、依心,而且各如其所應,入出息才會運轉。假使只依身而有息,進入無想定、進入滅盡定,以及生在無想天的有情,也應當有息運轉;但他們並沒有。假使只依心而有息,進入無色定或生在無色界的有情,也應當有息運轉;但他們並沒有。假使只要依身心便有息,而不必各如其所應,那麼進入第四靜慮、生在第四靜慮的有情,以及處在羯羅藍、頞部曇、閉尸等胎位的有情,也應當有息運轉;但他們並沒有。因此應知,必須依身、依心,而且各如其所應,入出息才會運轉。

入息、出息有二種行向。哪二種?一、入息向下而行,二、出息向上而行。

入息、出息有二種運行處。哪二種?一、麁孔穴,二、細孔穴。什麼是麁孔穴?就是從臍處的孔穴到面門、鼻門,再從面門、鼻門到臍處的孔穴。什麼是細孔穴?就是身中的一切毛孔。

入息、出息有四種異名。哪四種?一名風,二名阿那波那,三名入息出息,四名身行。「風」這一名是各種風共通的名稱;其餘三名,是入出息特有的名稱。

修入出息有二種過患。哪二種?一、用功太緩,二、用功太急。由用功太緩,便生起懈怠,或被惛沈睡眠纏擾其心,或使心向外散亂。由用功太急,便使身體不平衡,或使心不平衡。怎樣使身體不平衡?就是強行用力把持入出息;入出息被強持,便使身中不調和的風運轉,最初令各處肢節都生起顫動,所以名為「能戰掉」。這顫動之風若再增長,便能引生疾病,因此在各處肢節生起各種疾病,這名使身體不平衡。怎樣使心不平衡?就是使心生起種種散亂,或被極重的憂惱逼迫,這名使心不平衡。

又這阿那波那念,應知略有五種修習:一、算數修習,二、悟入諸蘊修習,三、悟入緣起修習,四、悟入聖諦修習,五、十六勝行修習。

1. 算數修習:略有四種——以一為一、以二為一、順算數、逆算數。  「以一為一算數」:入息入時緣入出息住念,數為一;入息滅、出息生而出向外時,數為第二;如是展轉數至其十(不略不廣,故唯至十)。  「以二為一算數」:入息入而已滅、出息生而已出時,總合二者數為一,數至其十——入出息名為二,總合數之為一,故名以二為一。  「順算數」:或以一為一、或以二為一,順次展轉數至其十。  「逆算數」:即由前二,逆次從第十、九、八、七、六、五、四、三、二、一而數。  行者於順逆算數已串修習、中間心無散亂後,再為說「勝進算數」:合二為一而算——若依「以一為一」則入出息二合為一,若依「以二為一」則入出息四合為一,如是展轉數至十;後後漸增,乃至「以百為一」而算。由這「以百為一」的算數,漸次數到十;如此勤修數息念,乃至「十十數以為一」,再漸次數到滿十。由這「以十為一」的算數,中間心無散亂,齊此名「已串修習」。中間若心散亂,應退還從初數起(或順或逆)。算數極串習故,心自然乘任運道,安住入出息所緣,無斷無間相續而轉——於入息能取、入息滅已於「息空位」能取,於出息能取、出息滅已於息空位能取,如是相續流注、無動無搖、無散亂行、有愛樂轉,齊此名「過算數地」,不應復數,唯令心安住入息、出息所緣。對入出息應正確隨行、審慎了達;對入息、出息及兩個中間息的轉、還分位差別,都善能覺了。這名算數修習。  又:鈍根者應為說此息念算數修習,他由此於散亂處令心安住愛樂;若不修算數,其心便為惛沈睡眠所擾、或於外馳散,由勤修數息便皆無有。若是利根、覺慧聰俊,不好乘此算數加行(雖為說也能速疾無倒了達,然不愛樂)。他於入出息緣安住念後,對「是處轉、乃至轉、如所轉、時而轉」一切,皆由安住念能正隨行、正了達;於此加行若多修習為因緣,便起身輕安、心輕安,證得一境性,於所緣愛樂趣入。

2. 悟入諸蘊修習:他於算數息念善修習後,復於「所取、能取」二事作意思惟,悟入諸蘊——於入出息及息所依的身作意思惟,悟入色蘊;於那能取息的念相應的領納作意思惟,悟入受蘊;於那念相應的等了(取像)作意思惟,悟入想蘊;於那念若相應的思及慧等作意思惟,悟入行蘊;於那念相應的諸心意識作意思惟,悟入識蘊。如是於諸蘊中乃至多住,名已悟入。這名悟入諸蘊修習。

3. 悟入緣起修習:若無倒能見能知唯有諸蘊、唯有諸行、唯事、唯法,他便能於諸行悟入緣起。怎麼悟入?觀行者如是尋求:「此入出息何依何緣?」既尋求已,如實悟入:此入出息依身緣身、依心緣心。又尋求:「此身心何依何緣?」悟入:依緣命根。又尋求:「命根何依何緣?」悟入:依緣先行(過去業)。又尋求:「先行何依何緣?」悟入:依緣無明。如是了知無明緣行、行緣命根、命根緣身心、身心緣入出息;又了知無明滅故行滅、行滅故命根滅、命根滅故身心滅、身心滅故入出息滅。這名悟入緣起。於緣起悟入多住,名善習修。這名悟入緣起修習。

4. 悟入聖諦修習:他於緣起善修習後,復於諸行如實了知從眾緣生,悟入無常——諸行無常故本無而有、有已散滅;若本無而有、有已散滅,即是生法、老法、病法、死法;若是生老病死法,即是苦;若是苦,即是無我、不得自在、遠離宰主。如是由無常、苦、空、無我行悟入苦諦。又正悟入諸有為行眾緣生起其性是苦,如病、如癰,一切皆以貪愛為緣;又悟入這能生眾苦的貪愛若無餘斷,即是畢竟寂靜微妙——「我若於此如是了知、觀見、多住,當能無餘斷貪愛」。如是悟入集諦、滅諦、道諦。於此悟入多住,便於諸諦中證得現觀。這名悟入聖諦修習。

5. 十六勝行修習:他於聖諦中善修習後,於見道所斷一切煩惱皆悉永斷,唯餘修道所斷煩惱;為斷彼故,復進修「十六勝行」。什麼是十六勝行?  (1)對於有念的入息,我現在能學習:有念地入息;對於有念的出息,我現在能學習:有念地出息。  (2)息或長,或短。  (3)對於覺了全身的入息,我現在能學習:覺了全身而入息;對於覺了全身的出息,我現在能學習:覺了全身而出息。  (4)對於止息身行的入息,我現在能學習:止息身行而入息;對於止息身行的出息,我現在能學習:止息身行而出息。  (5)對於覺了喜的入息,我現在能學習:覺了喜而入息;對於覺了喜的出息,我現在能學習:覺了喜而出息。  (6)對於覺了樂的入息,我現在能學習:覺了樂而入息;對於覺了樂的出息,我現在能學習:覺了樂而出息。  (7)對於覺了心行的入息,我現在能學習:覺了心行而入息;對於覺了心行的出息,我現在能學習:覺了心行而出息。  (8)對於止息心行的入息,我現在能學習:止息心行而入息;對於止息心行的出息,我現在能學習:止息心行而出息。  (9)對於覺了心的入息,我現在能學習:覺了心而入息;對於覺了心的出息,我現在能學習:覺了心而出息。  (10)對於喜悅心的入息,我現在能學習:喜悅其心而入息;對於喜悅心的出息,我現在能學習:喜悅其心而出息。  (11)對於制持心的入息,我現在能學習:制持其心而入息;對於制持心的出息,我現在能學習:制持其心而出息。  (12)對於解脫心的入息,我現在能學習:解脫其心而入息;對於解脫心的出息,我現在能學習:解脫其心而出息。  (13)對於隨觀無常的入息,我現在能學習:隨觀無常而入息;對於隨觀無常的出息,我現在能學習:隨觀無常而出息。  (14)對於隨觀斷的入息,我現在能學習:隨觀斷而入息;對於隨觀斷的出息,我現在能學習:隨觀斷而出息。  (15)對於隨觀離欲的入息,我現在能學習:隨觀離欲而入息;對於隨觀離欲的出息,我現在能學習:隨觀離欲而出息。  (16)對於隨觀滅的入息,我現在能學習:隨觀滅而入息;對於隨觀滅的出息,我現在能學習:隨觀滅而出息。

問:這十六的差別怎麼說?答:  有學見迹(已見道)已得四念住等,於入出息所緣作意更進修、為斷餘結,故念「念入息/念出息」〔第1〕。緣入出息境時念「念長入息出息」、緣中間入出息境時念「念短」,如其長短即如是了知,是名「若長若短」〔第2〕。若緣身中微細孔穴、入出息周遍隨入諸毛孔而起勝解,便念「覺了遍身入息出息」〔第3〕。若入息(及中間入息)已滅、出息(及中間出息)未生,緣入出息空無位、遠離位為境;或出息已滅、入息未生,緣其空無位、遠離位為境〔此二句底本作「出息…入息未生」,聖本「出/入」二字互易(0432c15)——底本從大正讀,聖本異讀並錄〕——便念「息除身行入息出息」;又由多修習故,先前未串習時剛強的苦觸隨轉,今已串習則皆息除、有柔軟樂觸隨轉,便念「息除身行」〔第4〕。  又勤修者若得初靜慮、或第二靜慮時,便念「覺了喜入息出息」〔第5〕;若得離喜的第三靜慮時,念「覺了樂」〔第6〕。第三靜慮以上,於阿那波那念無更修加行之理,故乃至第三靜慮宣說息念加行所攝。又覺了喜、覺了樂者或暫生忘念——或謂有我我所、或發我慢、或謂我當有/當無/當有色/當無色/當有想/當無想/當非有想非無想,生起這些愚癡想思俱行的動慢、戲論、造作、貪愛;纔生起便速疾以慧通達、不深染著,方便斷滅除遣變吐——由此加行便念「覺了心行入息出息」〔第7〕、「息除心行」〔第8〕。  又若得根本第一二三靜慮(或所得初靜慮近分未至依定),依此觀察所生起的心:如實知如實覺了——或有貪心/離貪心、有瞋心/離瞋心、有癡心/離癡心、略心/散心、下心/舉心、有掉動心/無掉動心、有寂靜心/無寂靜心、有等引心/無等引心、善修習心/不善修習心、善解脫心/不善解脫心——皆如實知,故念「覺了心入息出息」〔第9〕。若見惛沈睡眠蓋覆障其心,由極於內住寂止故,便於外隨緣一種淨妙境界示現、教導、讚勵、慶喜,策發其心,故念「喜悅心」〔第10〕。若見掉舉惡作蓋覆障其心,由極於外住囂舉故,便於內安住寂靜、制持其心,故念「制持心」〔第11〕。若心善修習故令現行蓋皆得遠離、於諸蓋中心得清淨,故念「解脫心」〔第12〕。  他於諸蓋已心解脫,餘有隨眠應斷;為斷彼起道現前,於諸行無常法性極善精懇如理觀察,故念「無常隨觀」〔第13〕。又彼先依下三靜慮或未至依定已於奢摩他修瑜伽行,今依無常隨觀復於毗鉢舍那修瑜伽行;如是止觀熏修心已,於諸界中從隨眠求解脫。什麼諸界?所謂三界:一斷界(見道所斷一切行斷),二離欲界(修道所斷一切行斷),三滅界(一切依滅)。思惟這三界寂靜、安隱、無患,修止觀;由多修習故,從餘修道所斷煩惱心得解脫,故念「斷隨觀、離欲隨觀、滅隨觀入息出息」〔第14、15、16〕。如是於見、修所斷一切煩惱皆永斷故,成阿羅漢、諸漏永盡,此後更無所應作事、於所決擇已得究竟。這名十六勝行。

如是修習,名為五種修習阿那波那念。多尋思行補特伽羅應於此正勤修學、愛樂乘御;若於所緣有思慮遽務、有散亂者,應於內各別親近這觀行。若於此勤修習,尋思散動皆無所有,心於所緣速疾安住、深生愛樂——這就名第五「多尋思行補特伽羅」的淨行所緣。

如是總名淨行所緣。

The third item of the Second Yoga-Station, "the object (ālambana)." It first sets out four kinds of object (pervasive · conduct-purifying · skill-in-means · defilement-cleansing); this file covers the first two: the pervasive object (the four images that all contemplative practice holds in common, with the appended Revata-sūtra) and the conduct-purifying objects — that is, the "five mind-stilling contemplations" that counter five kinds of conduct-disposition (the impure counters greed · loving-kindness counters hatred · the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures counters delusion · element-analysis counters conceit · mindfulness of breathing counters discursive thinking). Technical terms are kept in their old forms, rendered phrase by phrase into today's language, without adding doctrinal exposition, without citing śāstra, without annotating Sanskrit; where the treatise-text compresses, it is filled back out within 〔brackets〕.

The Overall Framework of the Object: The Four Kinds of Objective Field

What is the object? It is that there are four kinds of objective field. Which four? First, the pervasive objective field; second, the conduct-purifying objective field; third, the skill-in-means objective field; fourth, the defilement-cleansing objective field. 〔This file covers the first two; for skill-in-means and defilement-cleansing, see 13-02-03.〕

One. The Pervasive Object (the Four Images That All Contemplative Practice Holds in Common)

What is the pervasive objective field? It too is of four kinds: first, the image accompanied by discernment; second, the image without discernment; third, the exhaustive extent of the entity; fourth, the accomplishment of the task.

(1) The image accompanied by discernment: What is the image accompanied by discernment? There is a certain person who, taking as his basis either hearing the true Dharma or receiving instruction and admonition, and by way of seeing, of hearing, of discerning, examines, discriminates, thoroughly discriminates, thoroughly investigates, and thoroughly scrutinizes — by the insight-practice (vipaśyanā) of the stage of meditative equipoise (the stage of equipoise · the stage of concentration) — the "image concordant with the object-to-be-known."

What is this "object-to-be-known" here? It is: either the impure, or loving-kindness, or the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures, or element-analysis, or mindfulness of breathing; or skill regarding the aggregates, skill regarding the elements, skill regarding the sense-bases, skill regarding dependent origination, skill regarding what-is-and-is-not-a-basis; or the coarseness of a lower stage and the calmness of a higher stage; or the truth of suffering, the truth of origination, the truth of cessation, the truth of the path. These are named the object-to-be-known.

As for this object-to-be-known: taking as his basis either instruction and admonition or hearing the true Dharma, he brings the attention of the stage of equipoise before him, and toward that dharma he gives rise to resolute conviction, and toward that object-to-be-known he gives rise to resolute conviction. At that time, toward the object-to-be-known, he proceeds bearing resolute conviction as though he were directly receiving it in person. Although that object-to-be-known is not truly presently received, not conjoined and present before him, and is also not some other thing of the same type, nevertheless, through the resolute conviction of the stage of equipoise, he receives a "concordant attention" and receives a "concordant manifestation" of that object-to-be-known. By this principle it is named "the image concordant with the object-to-be-known." The practitioner of contemplation, seeking out this image, thereupon examines and determines its merits and faults within that original-nature object-to-be-known. This is named the image accompanied by discernment.

(2) The image without discernment: What is the image without discernment? The practitioner of contemplation, having taken up this image-mark, no longer examines, discriminates, thoroughly discriminates, thoroughly investigates, or thoroughly scrutinizes; rather, toward this objective image alone, he stills his mind by the practice of tranquillity (śamatha) — that is, he settles the mind by nine modes of activity: settling the mind inwardly, settling it evenly, settling it steadily, settling it closely, taming, stilling, utterly stilling, making it single-directed, and holding it evenly 〔the nine mind-settlings〕. At that time he then accomplishes the object that is "the image without discernment": toward this objective image, single-directedly and in one direction he settles his mindfulness upon it, no longer examining, discriminating, investigating, or scrutinizing. This is named the image without discernment.

This image is also named the image; also named the mark of concentration; also named the field ranged over by concentration; also named the mouth of concentration; also named the gateway of concentration; also named the locus of attention; also named the inner discerning-substance; also named the light-reflection — these are all various alternative names for "the image concordant with the object-to-be-known."

(3) The exhaustive extent of the entity: What is the exhaustive extent of the entity? It is the "extent of what there is" and the "way that things truly are" of the object. What is the extent of what there is? It is that apart from the form-aggregate there is no further form, and apart from the aggregates of feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness there is no further feeling, perception, formations, or consciousness; that all conditioned entities are subsumed by the five dharmas (form, feeling, perception, formations, consciousness), that all dharmas are subsumed by the elements and the sense-bases, that all objects-to-be-known are subsumed by the four noble truths — this is named the extent of what there is (the exhausting of the measure of the entity's characteristics). What is the way that things truly are? It is that the object is the truly-real nature, the nature of suchness, possessing rational-nature through the four principles (of dependence · of function · of proving-establishment · of the way-things-are) — this is named the way that things truly are (the truly-real basic nature of the entity's characteristics). The extent-of-what-there-is and the way-things-truly-are of the object are together stated as a single "exhaustive extent of the entity."

(4) The accomplishment of the task: What is the accomplishment of the task? Taking the cultivation, repeated practice, and abundant cultivation of tranquillity and insight as cause and condition, the practitioner brings to fullness all the varieties of attention that take an image as their object. Because those attentions are full, he attains transformation of the basis, and all coarse and heavy states wholly cease. Because he has attained transformation of the basis, he passes beyond the image and directly gives rise to non-discerning, direct-perception knowledge and vision of the object to be known. One who enters the first absorption gives rise to this knowledge and vision in the field of the first absorption when he attains it. One who enters the second absorption does so in the field of the second absorption; one who enters the third, in the field of the third; and one who enters the fourth, in the field of the fourth. One who enters the base of the infinity of space, the infinity of consciousness, nothing-whatever, or neither-perception-nor-non-perception gives rise to this knowledge and vision in the field of that respective attainment when he attains it. This is named the accomplishment of the task.

Why it is named "pervasive": these four objective fields course through everything and enter into every objective field, and they are what the Fully and Perfectly Awakened Ones of past, future, and present proclaim in common. Therefore they are named the pervasive object. Again, this object pervades the class of insight, the class of tranquillity, all entities, the truly real entity, and entities in which cause and effect belong together. Therefore it is named pervasive. When the image accompanied by discernment is spoken of, it is the class of insight spoken of here. When the image without discernment is spoken of, it is the class of tranquillity. When the exhaustive extent of the entity is spoken of, it is all entities and the truly real entity. When the accomplishment of the task is spoken of, it is the entity in which cause and effect belong together.

Appended: the Revata-sūtra: as the World-Honored One once explained this meaning for the elder Revata. It was heard that the elder Revata asked the World-Honored One: "Venerable one! When the various monks who diligently cultivate contemplation, being yoga practitioners, are able to settle their minds upon an object — for what reason do they settle their minds upon an object? How do they settle their minds upon an object? To what degree is the mind then named 'well settled'?" The Buddha commended him: "Well said, well said! You are able to ask this meaning. Now listen closely and reflect well, and I will proclaim it for you."

The Buddha said: Revata! The yoga practitioners who cultivate contemplation are able to settle their minds upon an object; whether they delight in conduct-purifying, or delight in skill-in-means, or delight in freeing the mind from the outflows, they settle their minds upon a "concordant object," settle their minds upon a "resembling object," settle their minds upon "the object without error," and are able therein not to relinquish meditative absorption.

—— What is "settling the mind upon a concordant object"? It is that if a monk has only greed-conduct, he should settle his mind upon the impure object; if he has only hatred-conduct, he should settle his mind upon loving-kindness; if he has only delusion-conduct, he should settle his mind upon the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures; if he has only conceit-conduct, he should settle his mind upon element-analysis; if he has only discursive-thinking-conduct, he should settle his mind upon mindfulness of breathing 〔the five mind-stillings against the five conducts〕. Again, if he is confused about the particular marks of the formations, and confused about the matter of "self · sentient being · living being · one-who-is-born · one-who-can-nourish · person," he should settle his mind upon skill regarding the aggregates; if he is confused about their cause, upon skill regarding the elements; if he is confused about their condition, upon skill regarding the sense-bases; if he is confused about impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and no-self, upon skill regarding dependent origination and what-is-and-is-not-a-basis; if he delights in departing from the desire of the desire-realm, he should settle his mind upon the coarseness of the desires and the calmness of forms; if he delights in departing from the desire of the form-realm, upon the coarseness of forms and the calmness of the formless; if he delights in penetrating and in being liberated from the all-pervasive substantialist-view of self (satkāya), he should settle his mind upon the four truths of suffering, origination, cessation, and the path. This is named settling the mind upon a concordant object (the medicine matched to the disease).

—— What is "settling the mind upon a resembling object"? It is that the monk, in order to discriminate, thoroughly discriminate, thoroughly investigate, and thoroughly scrutinize that object-to-be-known, gives rise to resolute conviction by contemplating and discerning, with the attention of the stage of equipoise, that which was previously seen, heard, sensed, and known — by the dominant force of seeing, hearing, sensing, and knowing. Although he cannot conjoin the original object-to-be-known and examine it present before him, he is able to generate a mark resembling the original entity, and toward that object he has a resembling "mere-knowing, mere-seeing, mere-right-recollection"; and from time to time he stills his mind, and from time to time he diligently cultivates contemplation by way of the higher-wisdom Dharma-insight. This is named settling the mind upon a resembling object (taking the image as object, not the original entity).

—— What is "settling the mind upon the object without error"? It is that the yoga practitioner settles his mind upon the objective field, and in accordance with what is fitting comprehends the object-to-be-known field, thoroughly knowing it as it truly is, without error. This is named settling the mind upon the object without error.

—— What is "being able therein not to relinquish meditative absorption"? It is that the yoga practitioner, thus rightly practicing upon the object, by uninterrupted application and by earnest application, from time to time cultivates the "mark of stopping, the mark of uplifting, and the mark of equanimity"; and by taking cultivation and abundant cultivation as cause and condition, all the coarse-and-heavy states are wholly extinguished, and accordingly he touches-and-realizes the "purity of the basis"; toward the object-to-be-known, because of directly seeing it, he touches-and-realizes the "purity of the object"; because of departing from greed, he touches-and-realizes the "thorough purity of the mind"; because of departing from ignorance (avidyā), he touches-and-realizes the "thorough purity of knowledge." This is named being able therein not to relinquish meditative absorption. Revata! When this monk thus settles his mind upon the objective field, and having thus settled his mind, it is named being well settled.

Upon this the World-Honored One again spoke a verse: "The practitioner practices the various marks, / knows the true meaning of everything, / constantly in the image absorbs in dhyāna, / and attains the realization of thorough purity." —— "The practitioner practices the various marks" states the uninterrupted and earnest practice upon the marks of stopping, uplifting, and equanimity; "knows the true meaning of everything" states the exhaustive extent of the entity; "constantly in the image absorbs in dhyāna" states the image accompanied by discernment and the image without discernment; "attains the realization of thorough purity" states the accomplishment of the task. The World-Honored One again spoke a verse: "Thoroughly knowing the mark of mind, / one can savor the taste of seclusion; / in dhyāna, with constant devoted mindfulness, / one savors joy and bliss, free of defilement." —— "Thoroughly knowing the mark of mind" means that the image accompanied by discernment and the image without discernment are stated under the name "mark of mind," and the exhaustive extent of the entity is stated under the name "thorough knowing"; "one can savor the taste of seclusion" states the delighting-in-severing and delighting-in-cultivating toward the object; "in dhyāna, with constant devoted mindfulness" states the constant diligent cultivation and the devoted-practicing (fine, close, and well-trained) cultivation of tranquillity and insight; "one savors joy and bliss, free of defilement" states the accomplishment of the task. It should be understood that a pervasive object such as this accords with the pure teaching and conforms to right principle. This is named the pervasive object.

Two. The Conduct-Purifying Objects (the Five Mind-Stilling Contemplations)

What is named the conduct-purifying object? It is the differentiation of objects such as the impure, loving-kindness, the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures, element-analysis, and mindfulness of breathing.

(1) The Impure Object — Counters Greed-Conduct

What is the impure object? Stated briefly, there are six kinds of impurity: first, the impurity of rot-and-filth; second, the impurity of suffering-and-distress; third, the impurity of the base-and-inferior; fourth, the impurity of comparison; fifth, the impurity of afflictions; sixth, the impurity of swift-decay.

What is the impurity of rot and filth? This impurity is explained in dependence on two kinds: first, the inner; second, the outer. What is the impurity of rot and filth that rests upon the inner? It is the hair of the head, body hair, nails, teeth, dirt, grime, skin, flesh, bones, skeleton, sinews, vessels, heart, gallbladder, liver, lungs, large intestine, small intestine, raw receptacle, cooked receptacle, belly, stomach, spleen, kidneys, pus, blood, hot phlegm, fat, grease, muscle, marrow, brain, membrane, nasal mucus, spittle, tears, sweat, feces, and urine within this body. Things of those kinds are named the impurity of rot and filth that rests upon the inner. What is the impurity of rot and filth that rests upon the outer? It is lividity, festering and rotting, decomposition, bloating, being devoured, turning crimson, scattering and breaking apart, bones, a chain of bones, bones together with a chain of bones, what is produced by feces, urine, spittle, or nasal mucus, what is smeared with blood or pus, and places fouled by excrement. Things of those kinds are named the impurity of rot and filth that rests upon the outer. The inner and outer kinds are together stated as the single impurity of rot and filth.

What is the impurity of suffering and distress? It is an unbalanced bodily or mental feeling that arises with contact consonant with painful feeling as its condition, and it is included in the aggregate of feeling. This is named the impurity of suffering and distress.

What is the impurity of the base and inferior? It is the most base and inferior entity and the most base and inferior realm, namely, the desire realm. Apart from this, no other realm can be found that is still lower, more inferior, or more utterly vile and filthy. This is named the impurity of the base and inferior.

What is the impurity of comparison? A lesser pure entity, when compared with another, superior pure entity, appears impure. Compared with the superior purity of the formless realm, the dharmas of the form realm appear impure. Compared with nirvāṇa, the cessation of the embodied collection, everything up to the summit of existence appears impure. All cases of those kinds are named the impurity of comparison.

What is the impurity of afflictions? All bonds, fetters, latent proclivities, secondary afflictions, and entanglements throughout the three realms are named the impurity of afflictions.

What is the impurity of swift decay? The five appropriated aggregates are impermanent, not enduring, unreliable, and of a nature that rapidly decays and transforms. This is named the impurity of swift decay.

Why are these six kinds of impurity objects that can purify greed-conduct? Because greed is of five kinds: first, the "desire, craving-for-desire, greed-for-desire" toward the inner body; second, the "sexual desire, sexual greed" toward the outer body; third, object-desire and object-greed; fourth, form-desire and form-greed; fifth, substantialist-view-of-self-desire and substantialist-view-of-self-greed — these are named the five greeds. In order to make these five kinds of desire-greed be severed, dispelled, and no longer active, six kinds of impure objects are established:  By the object of the impurity of rot-and-filth resting upon the inner, the mind is made pure with respect to the desire, craving-for-desire, greed-for-desire toward the inner body.  By the object of the impurity of rot-and-filth resting upon the outer, the mind is made pure with respect to the sexual desire and sexual greed toward the outer body. The greed associated with sexuality is again of four kinds: first, greed for color [complexion]; second, greed for shape; third, greed for exquisite touch; fourth, greed for attendance-and-service. By the four kinds of "outer impure object," the mind is made pure with respect to these four sexual greeds — if one attends to and contemplates the livid-blue, the festering-and-rotten, the transforming-and-decaying, the bloated, and the devoured, the mind is made pure with respect to "greed for color"; if one attends to and contemplates the turned-crimson, the mind is made pure with respect to "greed for shape"; if one attends to and contemplates bones, a chain, and a bone-chain, the mind is made pure with respect to "greed for exquisite touch"; if one attends to and contemplates the scattered-and-broken, the mind is made pure with respect to "greed for attendance-and-service." These four are named making the mind pure with respect to sexual greed.

Therefore the World-Honored One, regarding the various differentiations of "the impurity of rot-and-filth resting upon the outer," established them all in dependence upon the four kinds of "charnel-ground" (the śītavana · the corpse-depositing place):  If it is said "by way of the charnel-ground one sees the corpses, dead one day, two days, up to seven days, devoured by crows, magpies, starving dogs, kites, vultures, foxes, wolves, jackals, and beasts, and one then takes up that mark, likening one's own body to be of just such a nature, of just such a kind, unable to surpass such a dharma-nature" — this displays [everything] from the livid-blue up to the devoured.  If it is said "by way of the charnel-ground one sees the corpses, stripped of skin, flesh, and blood, bound about by sinews and vessels" — this displays the turned-crimson.  If it is said "by way of the charnel-ground one sees the bones, either bones or a chain" — this displays bones, a chain, and a bone-chain.  If it is said "by way of the charnel-ground one sees the bones — hand-bones, foot-bones, hip-bones, knee-bones, arm-bones, elbow-bones, spine-bones, shoulder-bones, rib-bones, the jawbone, the garland of teeth, the crown-skull, and so on, each scattered apart, and after one year, two, three, up to seven years, their color fresh-white like a conch-shell or like the color of a dove, or one sees those bones mixed together with dust and earth" — this displays the scattered-and-broken.

Thus the outer object of the impurity of rot-and-filth makes the mind pure with respect to the four kinds of greed associated with sexuality; by the two objects of the impurity of suffering-and-distress and the impurity of the base-and-inferior, the mind is made pure with respect to the desire-greed "associated with objects"; by the object of the impurity of comparison, the mind is made pure with respect to the desire-greed "associated with form"; by the two objects of the impurity of afflictions and the impurity of swift-decay, the mind is made pure with respect to the desire-greed "toward all the substantialist-views-of-self from the desire-realm up to the summit of existence." This is named the conduct-purifying object of greed-conduct — the above, taking "what can purify greed-conduct," states in sum all the impure objects subsumed under the general remedy. Now in the present meaning, the basic intent takes only "the impurity of rot-and-filth" (the remaining five kinds of impurity are likewise subsumed, respectively, under the remaining conduct-purifying objects).

(2) The Loving-Kindness Object — Counters Hatred-Conduct

What is the loving-kindness object? It is, toward the class of the dear, or the class of the hostile, or the class of the neutral, equally settling in the "intention-of-benefit" (the mind that wishes them to gain benefit), the resolute conviction of the stage of equipoise that can draw forth low, middling, and superior pleasure. It should be understood that here: the three — the class of the dear, the class of the hostile, and the class of the neutral — are the "object"; the intention-of-benefit and the resolute conviction of the stage of equipoise that can draw forth pleasure are the "object-taker"; the object and the object-taker are together abbreviated into one, named the loving-kindness object.

If the sūtra says "the mind conjoined with loving-kindness," this displays the intention-of-benefit toward the object of the three classes — dear, hostile, and neutral. If it says "without enmity, without adversary, without harm," this displays the three marks of the intention-of-benefit: because of being without enmity it is named the dominant intention-of-benefit, and this without-enmity nature is displayed by the two phrases "being without adversary" (not wishing to be mutually opposed and contentious) and "being without harm-and-distress" (not wishing to be un-beneficial). If it says "vast, great, and measureless," this displays the drawing-forth of low, middling, and superior pleasure — the pleasure of the desire-realm is named "vast," the pleasure of the first and second absorption-stages is named "great," and the pleasure of the third absorption-stage is named "measureless." If it says "dwelling complete in resolute conviction pervasively filling," this displays the resolute conviction of the stage of equipoise that can draw forth pleasure; this resolute conviction is precisely the resolute-conviction-attention that co-operates and is subsumed under the dominant intention-of-benefit that can draw forth pleasure. If, toward the sentient beings of the three classes — dear, hostile, and neutral — who are "without suffering and without pleasure," one equally wishes to give them pleasure, it should be understood this is "loving-kindness"; if, toward the sentient beings of the three classes who "have suffering, have pleasure," one equally wishes to remove their suffering and wishes to rejoice in their pleasure, it should be understood this is "compassion, this is sympathetic joy" — suffering sentient beings are the object of compassion, and pleasured sentient beings are the object of sympathetic joy. This is named the loving-kindness object. If there is a person of hatred-conduct who cultivates loving-kindness toward sentient beings, causing hatred to become slight, this is named making the mind pure with respect to hatred.

〔Within the Basic Section, the Śrāvaka Stage, the thirteenth, the second part of the Second Yoga-Station.〕

(3) The Dependent-Origination-of-Conditioned-Natures Object — Counters Delusion-Conduct

What is the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures object? It is that, throughout the three times, there is only coursing, only dharmas, only entities, only causes, only effects, falling into right principle — that is, the principle of dependence, the principle of function, the principle of proving-establishment, and the principle of the way-things-are (the four principles): there are only dharmas able to draw forth dharmas, and there is neither a doer nor a receiver. This is named the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures object. Attending to and contemplating this object, all the delusion-conduct of a person in whom delusion-conduct is dominant becomes slight, and the mind is made pure with respect to the various kinds of delusion-conduct. This is named the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures object.

(4) The Element-Analysis Object — Counters Conceit-Conduct

What is the element-analysis object? It is the differentiation of the six elements: first, the earth-element; second, the water-element; third, the fire-element; fourth, the wind-element; fifth, the space-element; sixth, the consciousness-element.

What is the earth-element? The earth-element is of two kinds: first, the inner earth-element; second, the outer earth-element. The inner earth-element is the distinct solidity within this body. It is included in hardness and in earth-as-earth, is attached to the body, and is appropriated. What are its concrete instances? The hair of the head, body hair, nails, teeth, dirt and grime, skin, flesh, skeleton and bones, sinews, vessels, liver, gallbladder, heart, lungs, spleen, kidneys, belly, stomach, large intestine, small intestine, the raw receptacle, the cooked receptacle, and feces and other filth are named the inner earth-element. The outer earth-element is external solidity. It is included in hardness and in earth-as-earth, is not attached to the body, and is not appropriated. What are its concrete instances? Tiles, wood, clods, gravel, trees, stones, mountains, cliffs, and things of those kinds are named the outer earth-element.

What is the water-element? The water-element is of two kinds: first, the inner water-element; second, the outer water-element. The inner water-element is the distinct moisture within this body. It is included in wetness and in water-as-water, is attached to the body, and is appropriated. What are its concrete instances? Tears, sweat, nasal mucus, spittle, fat, grease, oil, marrow, hot phlegm, pus and blood, brain, membrane, urine, and things of those kinds are named the inner water-element. The outer water-element is external moisture. It is included in wetness and in water-as-water, is not attached to the body, and is not appropriated. What are its concrete instances? Wells, springs, pools, marshes, reservoirs, lakes, rivers, seas, and things of those kinds are named the outer water-element.

What is the fire-element? The fire-element is of two kinds: first, the inner fire-element; second, the outer fire-element. The inner fire-element is the distinct warmth within this body. It is included in heat and in warmth-as-warmth, is attached to the body, and is appropriated. What are its concrete instances? All the warmth within the body that makes the body hot, evenly hot, and pervasively hot belongs here. Through that warmth, what is eaten, drunk, chewed, and tasted is properly and readily digested and transformed. When that warmth becomes excessive, it enters the category of steaming heat. Things of those kinds are named the inner fire-element. The outer fire-element is external warmth. It is included in heat and in warmth-as-warmth, is not attached to the body, and is not appropriated. What are its concrete instances? People produce fire by means of a fire drill, powdered cow dung, and the like. Once arisen, that fire can burn cow dung, grass, firewood, thickets, wilderness, mountains, islets, villages or parts of villages, cities or parts of cities, countries or parts of countries, and other things of those kinds. These are named the outer fire-element.

What is the wind-element? The wind-element is of two kinds: first, the inner wind-element; second, the outer wind-element. The inner wind-element is the distinct wind-nature within this body. It is included in blowing movement, has the nature of lightness and motion, is attached to the body, and is appropriated. What are its concrete instances? Within the body there are the upward-coursing wind, the downward-coursing wind, the flank-lying wind, the spine-lying wind, the waist wind, the hip wind, the small-knife wind, the great-knife wind, the needle-pricking wind, the pippala wind, the in-and-out-breath wind, and the wind that follows the limbs and joints. Things of those kinds are named the inner wind-element. The outer wind-element is external wind-nature. It is included in blowing movement, has the nature of lightness and motion, is not attached to the body, and is not appropriated. What are its concrete instances? Outside the body there are winds from the east, west, south, and north; dusty and dustless winds; narrow and vast winds; the vaiśvabhya wind, the vairambhaka wind, and the wind-disc wind. Sometimes a great wind suddenly arises and gathers, breaking trees, toppling walls, collapsing mountains, and churning the sea. After it has blown, having nothing on which to depend, it naturally becomes still. When sentient beings wish to obtain wind, they shake clothing, wave a fan, or wave a palm leaf. Things of those kinds are named the outer wind-element.

What is the space-element? It is the orifices of the eyes, ears, nose, mouth, throat, and the like. Through these one swallows, within these swallowing occurs, and once something has been swallowed, through these orifices it passes downward and is discharged. Things of those kinds are named the space-element.

What is the consciousness-element? It is the eye-, ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousnesses, and also the three differentiations of mind, mentation, and consciousness. This is named the consciousness-element.

If a person of conceit-conduct attends to and contemplates the element-analysis, he then departs, within the body, from the "notion of a single whole" (the notion that takes the body as a seamless unity), and gains the "notion of the impure," no longer haughtily lifting himself up, so that his pride-and-conceit becomes slight, and the mind is made pure with respect to the various kinds of conceit-conduct. This is named the conduct-purifying object of a person of conceit-conduct by way of element-analysis.

(5) The Mindfulness-of-Breathing Object — Counters Discursive-Thinking-Conduct

What is the mindfulness-of-breathing object? It is that the mindfulness that takes the in-breath and out-breath as object is named mindfulness of breathing; and the in-and-out-breaths and the like that are this mindfulness's object are named the mindfulness-of-breathing object.

It should be understood that here the in-breath is of two kinds. What are the two? First, the in-breath; second, the intermediate in-breath. What is the in-breath? It is the wind that, without any interval after the out-breath, turns inward through the inner gateway as far as the region of the navel. What is the intermediate in-breath? After the in-breath has ceased and before the out-breath has arisen, at the resting place between them a subtle wind resembling breath arises briefly. This is named the intermediate in-breath.

The out-breath is likewise of two kinds. What are the two? First, the out-breath; second, the intermediate out-breath. Their pattern is like that of the in-breath and intermediate in-breath. The difference is that the out-breath is the wind that, without any interval after the in-breath, turns outward through the outer gateway, beginning at the navel and reaching the face-gate, the tip of the nose, or beyond the body. The intermediate out-breath is the subtle wind that arises briefly at the resting place after the out-breath has ceased and before the in-breath has arisen.

The in- and out-breaths have two causes and conditions. What are the two? First, propelling karma; second, the orifice at the navel or the orifices in the upper part of the body.

The in- and out-breaths have two supports. What are the two? First, the body; second, the mind. Why is this? The breaths turn only in dependence on body and mind, each as is fitting. If breath turned in dependence on the body alone, then beings entering the no-perception concentration or the attainment of cessation, and beings born in the no-perception heaven, ought to breathe; yet breath does not turn in them. If breath turned in dependence on the mind alone, then beings entering a formless concentration or born in the formless realm ought to breathe; yet breath does not turn in them. If mere dependence on body and mind were enough, without each being present as is fitting, then beings entering or born in the fourth absorption, and beings at the embryonic stages of kalala, arbuda, and peśī, ought to breathe; yet breath does not turn in them. Therefore, the in- and out-breaths turn only in dependence on body and mind, each as is fitting.

The in- and out-breaths have two directions of movement. What are the two? First, the in-breath moves downward; second, the out-breath moves upward.

The in- and out-breaths have two kinds of ground. What are the two? First, the coarse orifices; second, the fine orifices. What are the coarse orifices? They extend from the navel orifice to the face-gate and nose-gate, and again from the face-gate and nose-gate to the navel orifice. What are the fine orifices? They are all the pores throughout the body.

The in- and out-breaths have four alternative names. What are the four? First, wind; second, āna-apāna; third, in-breath and out-breath; fourth, body-formation. "Wind" is a name shared with all wind, while the remaining three are names distinctive to the in- and out-breaths.

Cultivating the in- and out-breaths has two faults. What are the two? First, applying the method too slackly; second, applying it too urgently. Applying it too slackly gives rise to indolence, allows dullness and drowsiness to bind and disturb the mind, or makes the mind scatter outward. Applying it too urgently makes either the body or the mind unbalanced. How does it make the body unbalanced? One forcibly holds the in- and out-breaths. Because the breaths are held, an unbalanced wind turns within the body and at first causes all the limbs and joints to tremble; it is therefore called "the trembling-inducing wind." If this trembling wind increases, it can give rise to illness, producing diseases in the limbs and joints. This is how it makes the body unbalanced. How does it make the mind unbalanced? It either causes various forms of distraction or presses the mind with extremely heavy grief and distress. This is how it makes the mind unbalanced.

Again, this mindfulness of breathing should be understood to have, briefly, five kinds of cultivation: first, the cultivation of counting; second, the cultivation of penetrating the aggregates; third, the cultivation of penetrating dependent origination; fourth, the cultivation of penetrating the noble truths; fifth, the cultivation of the sixteen superior practices.

1. The cultivation of counting: briefly, there are four kinds — taking one as one, taking two as one, forward-counting, and reverse-counting.  "Taking one as one, counting": when the in-breath enters, taking the in-and-out-breath as object he settles his mindfulness, and counts it as one; when the in-breath ceases and the out-breath arises and turns outward, he counts it as the second; and thus turning about he counts up to ten (neither abridging nor extending, hence only up to ten).  "Taking two as one, counting": when the in-breath has entered and already ceased, and the out-breath has arisen and already gone out, at that time he combines the two together and counts them as one, counting up to ten — the in-breath and out-breath are named "two," and combining the two together he counts them as one, hence it is named taking two as one.  "Forward-counting": either taking one as one, or taking two as one, in forward sequence turning about he counts up to ten.  "Reverse-counting": that is, from the former two, in reverse sequence he counts from the tenth — nine, eight, seven, six, five, four, three, two, one.  After the practitioner has continuously cultivated the forward and reverse counting and in the interval his mind is without distraction, one further explains for him "advancing counting": counting by combining two into one — if by "taking one as one," then in-and-out-breath, the two combined into one; if by "taking two as one," then in-and-out-breath, the four combined into one; and thus turning about he counts up to ten. Afterward he gradually increases, up to counting by "taking a hundred as one." By this counting that takes a hundred as one, he gradually counts up to ten. Thus one who diligently cultivates mindfulness of counting the breaths goes on to "take ten tens as one" and gradually counts up to a full ten. Through this counting that takes ten as one, his mind is without distraction in the interval — up to this point it is named "having continuously cultivated." If in the interval the mind is distracted, he should withdraw and count again from the beginning (either forward or reverse). Because the counting is extremely continuously practiced, the mind naturally rides the spontaneous course, settling upon the object of the in-and-out-breaths, turning uninterruptedly and without interval in continuity — grasping upon the in-breath, and when the in-breath has ceased grasping upon the "empty position of breath," grasping upon the out-breath, and when the out-breath has ceased grasping upon the empty position of breath, and thus continuously flowing on, unmoving and unshaking, without distracted activity, turning with delight — up to this point it is named "having passed beyond the ground of counting," and he should count no more, but only make the mind settle upon the object of the in-breath and out-breath. With regard to the in- and out-breaths, he should rightly follow them and carefully comprehend them; and he should be well aware of the differentiations of the turning and returning phases among the in-breath, the out-breath, and the two intervals. This is named the cultivation of counting.  Again: for one of dull faculties, one should explain this counting-cultivation of breath-mindfulness; by it he makes the mind settle and delight in a place of distraction; if he did not cultivate counting, his mind would be disturbed by dullness and drowsiness, or would gallop outward and scatter, but by diligently cultivating breath-counting these are all absent. If one is of sharp faculties, of keen and quick understanding, he does not care to ride upon this counting-application (though if it is explained for him he too can swiftly and without error comprehend it, yet he does not delight in it). Having settled his mindfulness upon the object of the in-and-out-breaths, toward "where it turns, up to where it turns, as it turns, and when it turns," in all of this he is able, by settled mindfulness, rightly to accord-and-follow and rightly to comprehend; and if he takes this application, abundantly cultivated, as cause and condition, there arise bodily pliancy and mental pliancy, he realizes one-pointedness, and he enters with delight upon the object.

2. The cultivation of penetrating the aggregates: having well cultivated the counting of breath-mindfulness, he further attends to and contemplates the two matters of "the grasped and the grasper," penetrating the aggregates — attending to and contemplating the in-and-out-breaths and the body upon which the breath depends, he penetrates the form-aggregate; attending to and contemplating the feeling associated with the mindfulness that grasps the breath, he penetrates the feeling-aggregate; attending to and contemplating the "even-comprehending" (image-taking) associated with that mindfulness, he penetrates the perception-aggregate; attending to and contemplating the volition and wisdom and the like associated with that mindfulness, he penetrates the formations-aggregate; attending to and contemplating the minds, mentations, and consciousnesses associated with that mindfulness, he penetrates the consciousness-aggregate. Thus, dwelling much within the aggregates, he is named having penetrated. This is named the cultivation of penetrating the aggregates.

3. The cultivation of penetrating dependent origination: if, without error, he can see and can know that there are only aggregates, only formations, only entities, only dharmas, he can then penetrate dependent origination within the formations. How does he penetrate? The practitioner of contemplation seeks thus: "On what does this in-and-out-breath depend, and on what is it conditioned?" Having sought, he penetrates as it truly is: this in-and-out-breath depends on the body and is conditioned by the body, depends on the mind and is conditioned by the mind. Again he seeks: "On what do this body and mind depend, and on what are they conditioned?" He penetrates: they depend on and are conditioned by the life-faculty. Again he seeks: "On what does the life-faculty depend, and on what is it conditioned?" He penetrates: it depends on and is conditioned by prior action (past karma). Again he seeks: "On what does prior action depend, and on what is it conditioned?" He penetrates: it depends on and is conditioned by ignorance. Thus he understands that ignorance conditions the formations, the formations condition the life-faculty, the life-faculty conditions body-and-mind, and body-and-mind conditions the in-and-out-breaths; and again he understands that because ignorance ceases the formations cease, because the formations cease the life-faculty ceases, because the life-faculty ceases body-and-mind ceases, and because body-and-mind ceases the in-and-out-breaths cease. This is named penetrating dependent origination. Dwelling much in the penetration of dependent origination is named well-practiced cultivation. This is named the cultivation of penetrating dependent origination.

4. The cultivation of penetrating the noble truths: having well cultivated dependent origination, he further, toward the formations, knows as it truly is that they arise from a multitude of conditions, and penetrates impermanence — because the formations are impermanent, they were originally not and yet come to be, and having come to be, disperse and cease; if what was originally not comes to be, and having come to be disperses and ceases, then it is a dharma of birth, a dharma of aging, a dharma of sickness, a dharma of death; if it is a dharma of birth, aging, sickness, and death, then it is suffering; if it is suffering, then it is no-self, not gaining mastery, remote from any sovereign-master. Thus, by the practice of impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and no-self, he penetrates the truth of suffering. Again he rightly penetrates that all the conditioned formations, arising from a multitude of conditions, are of a nature that is suffering, like a disease, like a boil, all having craving as their condition; and he penetrates that if this craving that gives rise to the multitude of sufferings is severed without remainder, this is the ultimate stillness and subtlety — "if toward this I thus understand, contemplate-and-see, and dwell much, I shall be able to sever craving without remainder." Thus he penetrates the truth of origination, the truth of cessation, and the truth of the path. Dwelling much in this penetration, he then realizes direct-comprehension within the truths. This is named the cultivation of penetrating the noble truths.

5. The cultivation of the sixteen superior practices: having well cultivated within the noble truths, all the afflictions to be severed by the path-of-seeing are wholly and permanently severed, and only the afflictions to be severed by the path-of-cultivation remain; in order to sever those, he further advances in the cultivation of the "sixteen superior practices." What are the sixteen superior practices?  (1) With respect to a mindful in-breath, "I now can train in breathing in mindfully"; with respect to a mindful out-breath, "I now can train in breathing out mindfully."  (2) Whether the breath is long or short.  (3) With respect to an in-breath that is aware of the whole body, "I now can train in breathing in while aware of the whole body"; with respect to an out-breath that is aware of the whole body, "I now can train in breathing out while aware of the whole body."  (4) With respect to an in-breath that stills the body-formation, "I now can train in breathing in while stilling the body-formation"; with respect to an out-breath that stills the body-formation, "I now can train in breathing out while stilling the body-formation."  (5) With respect to an in-breath that is aware of joy, "I now can train in breathing in while aware of joy"; with respect to an out-breath that is aware of joy, "I now can train in breathing out while aware of joy."  (6) With respect to an in-breath that is aware of bliss, "I now can train in breathing in while aware of bliss"; with respect to an out-breath that is aware of bliss, "I now can train in breathing out while aware of bliss."  (7) With respect to an in-breath that is aware of the mind-formation, "I now can train in breathing in while aware of the mind-formation"; with respect to an out-breath that is aware of the mind-formation, "I now can train in breathing out while aware of the mind-formation."  (8) With respect to an in-breath that stills the mind-formation, "I now can train in breathing in while stilling the mind-formation"; with respect to an out-breath that stills the mind-formation, "I now can train in breathing out while stilling the mind-formation."  (9) With respect to an in-breath that is aware of the mind, "I now can train in breathing in while aware of the mind"; with respect to an out-breath that is aware of the mind, "I now can train in breathing out while aware of the mind."  (10) With respect to an in-breath that gladdens the mind, "I now can train in breathing in while gladdening the mind"; with respect to an out-breath that gladdens the mind, "I now can train in breathing out while gladdening the mind."  (11) With respect to an in-breath that restrains and holds the mind, "I now can train in breathing in while restraining and holding the mind"; with respect to an out-breath that restrains and holds the mind, "I now can train in breathing out while restraining and holding the mind."  (12) With respect to an in-breath that liberates the mind, "I now can train in breathing in while liberating the mind"; with respect to an out-breath that liberates the mind, "I now can train in breathing out while liberating the mind."  (13) With respect to an in-breath that contemplates impermanence, "I now can train in breathing in while contemplating impermanence"; with respect to an out-breath that contemplates impermanence, "I now can train in breathing out while contemplating impermanence."  (14) With respect to an in-breath that contemplates severance, "I now can train in breathing in while contemplating severance"; with respect to an out-breath that contemplates severance, "I now can train in breathing out while contemplating severance."  (15) With respect to an in-breath that contemplates dispassion, "I now can train in breathing in while contemplating dispassion"; with respect to an out-breath that contemplates dispassion, "I now can train in breathing out while contemplating dispassion."  (16) With respect to an in-breath that contemplates cessation, "I now can train in breathing in while contemplating cessation"; with respect to an out-breath that contemplates cessation, "I now can train in breathing out while contemplating cessation."

Question: How are the differentiations of these sixteen stated? Answer:  One in training who has seen the trace (has entered the path-of-seeing) has already gained the four foundations of mindfulness and the rest, and toward the object of the in-and-out-breaths further advances in cultivating attention, in order to sever the remaining fetters, hence being mindful "being mindful of the in-breath / being mindful of the out-breath" 〔the first〕. When taking the in-and-out-breath field as object he is mindful "being mindful of the long in-breath, out-breath"; when taking the intermediate in-and-out-breath field as object he is mindful "being mindful of the short," and comprehends the length and shortness just as they are — this is named "whether long or short" 〔the second〕. If, taking as object the fine orifices within the body and the in-and-out-breaths pervasively entering along all the pores, he gives rise to resolute conviction, he is then mindful "being aware of the whole-body in-breath, out-breath" 〔the third〕. If the in-breath (and the intermediate in-breath) has ceased and the out-breath (and the intermediate out-breath) has not yet arisen, taking as object the empty-and-nonexistent position, the remote position of the in-and-out-breath; or if the out-breath has ceased and the in-breath has not yet arisen, taking as object its empty-and-nonexistent position, its remote position 〔for these two phrases the base text reads "the out-breath… the in-breath has not yet arisen"; in the Sheng edition the two characters "out / in" are interchanged (0432c15) — the base text follows the Taishō reading, and the Sheng edition's variant reading is also recorded〕 — he is then mindful "stilling the body-formation on the in-breath, out-breath"; and moreover, because of abundant cultivation, the rigid painful contact that formerly, when not yet continuously practiced, turned along [with the breath] is now, being continuously practiced, wholly stilled, and a soft, blissful contact turns along, so that he is mindful "stilling the body-formation" 〔the fourth〕.  Again, the diligent cultivator, when he gains the first absorption or the second absorption, is then mindful "being aware of joy on the in-breath, out-breath" 〔the fifth〕; when he gains the joy-free third absorption, he is mindful "being aware of bliss" 〔the sixth〕. Above the third absorption there is no principle of further cultivating application within mindfulness of breathing, hence up to the third absorption it is stated as subsumed under the application of breath-mindfulness. Again, one who is aware of joy and aware of bliss may momentarily give rise to forgetfulness of mindfulness — either supposing there is a self and what belongs to a self, or giving rise to the conceit "I am," or supposing "I shall exist / shall not exist / shall have form / shall be formless / shall have perception / shall be without perception / shall be neither with perception nor without perception," giving rise to these deluded notions-and-thoughts and their co-operating stirring-conceit, conceptual proliferation, fabrication, and craving; as soon as they arise, he can swiftly penetrate them with wisdom, not becoming deeply defiled-and-attached, and by skillful means severs, dispels, and expels them — by this application he is then mindful "being aware of the mind-formation on the in-breath, out-breath" 〔the seventh〕, "stilling the mind-formation" 〔the eighth〕.  Again, if he gains the fundamental first, second, or third absorption (or the access-concentration, the threshold-concentration, of the first absorption he has gained), in dependence upon this he examines the mind that has arisen: knowing it as it truly is and being aware of it as it truly is — whether a mind with greed / a mind free of greed, a mind with hatred / a mind free of hatred, a mind with delusion / a mind free of delusion, a contracted mind / a scattered mind, a lowered mind / an uplifted mind, a mind with excitement / a mind without excitement, a stilled mind / an unstilled mind, a mind in equipoise / a mind not in equipoise, a well-cultivated mind / a poorly-cultivated mind, a well-liberated mind / a poorly-liberated mind — all as they truly are, hence being mindful "being aware of the mind on the in-breath, out-breath" 〔the ninth〕. If he sees dullness-and-drowsiness covering-and-obstructing his mind, because he is dwelling too much inwardly in tranquil-stopping, he then, toward some pure and sublime object outward, displays, instructs, exhorts, and gladdens, rousing his mind, hence being mindful "gladdening the mind" 〔the tenth〕. If he sees excitement-and-regret covering-and-obstructing his mind, because he is dwelling too much outwardly in clamorous-uplifting, he then settles inwardly in stillness and restrains-and-holds his mind, hence being mindful "restraining-and-holding the mind" 〔the eleventh〕. If, because his mind is well-cultivated, he makes the actively-operating hindrances all become remote, and within the various hindrances the mind is made pure, hence being mindful "liberating the mind" 〔the twelfth〕.  His mind having been liberated from the hindrances, remaining latent proclivities should be severed; in order to sever them he brings the path before him, and toward the impermanent dharma-nature of the formations he examines with utmost goodness, earnestness, and accord with principle, hence being mindful "contemplating impermanence" 〔the thirteenth〕. Moreover, he, having formerly, in dependence on the lower three absorptions or the threshold-concentration, cultivated the yogic practice of tranquillity, now, in dependence on the contemplation of impermanence, again cultivates the yogic practice of insight; and having thus perfumed-and-cultivated the mind with tranquillity and insight, he seeks liberation from the latent proclivities within the various elements. What various elements? Namely, the three elements: first, the element of severance (the severing of all formations to be severed by the path-of-seeing); second, the element of dispassion (the severing of all formations to be severed by the path-of-cultivation); third, the element of cessation (the cessation of all bases). Contemplating these three elements as stilled, secure, and free of trouble, he cultivates tranquillity and insight; and because of abundant cultivation, his mind is liberated from the remaining afflictions to be severed by the path-of-cultivation, hence being mindful "contemplating severance, contemplating dispassion, contemplating cessation on the in-breath, out-breath" 〔the fourteenth, fifteenth, sixteenth〕. Thus, because all the afflictions to be severed by the path-of-seeing and the path-of-cultivation are permanently severed, he becomes an arhat, with the outflows permanently exhausted; thereafter there is nothing further to be done, and toward what is to be ascertained he has reached the ultimate. This is named the sixteen superior practices.

Cultivating in this way is named the five kinds of cultivation of mindfulness of breathing. A person of much-discursive-thinking-conduct should rightly and diligently train herein and delight in mastering it; one who, toward the object, has anxious preoccupation and distraction should individually and inwardly draw near to this contemplation. If one diligently cultivates herein, discursive-thinking and agitation are wholly absent, and the mind settles swiftly upon the object, giving rise to deep delight — this is named the conduct-purifying object of the fifth, "a person of much-discursive-thinking-conduct."

Thus, in sum, this is named the conduct-purifying object.

聲聞地 · 第二瑜伽處 · 善巧淨惑+修學六科The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · Second Yoga-Station · The Skillfulness and Affliction-Purifying Objects, and the Six Rubrics of the Training

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

接所緣前二(遍滿·淨行),本子說所緣後二——善巧所緣(蘊界處緣起處非處五善巧,治愚)與淨惑所緣(世間道觀麁靜·出世間道觀四諦,斷惑)——四種所緣至此說竟;再順走第二瑜伽處的修學六科:教授·學·隨順學法·瑜伽壞·瑜伽·作意。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

一、善巧所緣(治愚·五善巧)

什麼是善巧所緣?略有五種:一、蘊善巧,二、界善巧,三、處善巧,四、緣起善巧,五、處非處善巧。

(一)蘊善巧。什麼是蘊?什麼是蘊善巧?蘊有五種:色蘊、受蘊、想蘊、行蘊、識蘊。

什麼是色蘊?所有一切色法,都是四大種(地、水、火、風)以及四大種所造的色。這一切色又分為過去、未來、現在,內、外,麁、細,劣、勝,遠、近。把這一切總合起來,名為色蘊。

什麼是受蘊?就是以順樂受之觸為緣所生的受、以順苦受之觸為緣所生的受,以及以順不苦不樂受之觸為緣所生的受。又有六種受身:眼觸所生受、耳觸所生受、鼻觸所生受、舌觸所生受、身觸所生受、意觸所生受。把這一切總合起來,名為受蘊。

什麼是想蘊?就是有相想、無相想、狹小想、廣大想、無量想,以及無諸所有的無所有處想。又有六種想身:眼觸所生想、耳觸所生想、鼻觸所生想、舌觸所生想、身觸所生想、意觸所生想。把這一切總合起來,名為想蘊。

什麼是行蘊?就是六種思身:眼觸所生思、耳觸所生思、鼻觸所生思、舌觸所生思、身觸所生思、意觸所生思。此外,還包括除受與想以外的其餘各種心法。把這一切總合起來,名為行蘊。

什麼是識蘊?就是心、意、識,又包括六種識身:眼識、耳識、鼻識、舌識、身識、意識。把這一切總合起來,名為識蘊。前面所說的受蘊、想蘊、行蘊,以及這裡的識蘊,也都像色蘊一樣,各有過去、未來、現在,內、外,麁、細,劣、勝,遠、近等差別。以上就名為五蘊。

什麼是蘊善巧?就是善能了知上述諸蘊的種種差別性、並非單一而有眾多品類的性質;同時了知,除了這些蘊法以外,更沒有別的所得,也沒有別的所分別。這是略說蘊善巧的意義。

什麼叫作蘊的種種差別性?就是色蘊不同於受蘊,受蘊不同於想蘊,想蘊不同於行蘊,行蘊不同於識蘊;乃至識蘊也各有自己的差別。這就名為種種差別性。

什麼叫作蘊的非一眾多性?例如色蘊並非單一,而有眾多品類:四大種與四大種所造各有差別,過去、未來、現在等品類也各有差別。這就名為色蘊的非一眾多性。其餘受、想、行、識四蘊,也應依各自相應的差別而如實了知。

什麼叫作除這些法以外更無所得、無所分別?就是只有蘊可得、只有事可得;離開五蘊之外,並沒有一個「我」可以得到,也沒有一個常恒安住而永不變易的法可以得到,更沒有任何少分之法可以說是「我所有」。因此,除五蘊以外,更無所得,也無所分別。

(二)界善巧。什麼是界?什麼是界善巧?界有十八種:眼界、色界、眼識界,耳界、聲界、耳識界,鼻界、香界、鼻識界,舌界、味界、舌識界,身界、觸界、身識界,意界、法界、意識界。這些就名為十八界。若能對這十八種法如實了知、如實認可並審察:它們各從不同的界、不同的種子、不同的種姓而生起出現,便名為界善巧。如實了知十八種法各從不同的界而運轉,就是對它們的因緣得到善巧,所以名為界善巧。

(三)處善巧。什麼是處?什麼是處善巧?處有十二種:眼處、色處、耳處、聲處、鼻處、香處、舌處、味處、身處、觸處、意處、法處。這些就名為十二處。

什麼是處善巧?以眼識為例:眼處作增上緣,色處作所緣緣,前一念剛滅的意作等無間緣,由這三緣生起眼識及其相應法。以耳識為例:耳處作增上緣,聲處作所緣緣,前一念剛滅的意作等無間緣,由這三緣生起耳識及其相應法。其餘鼻識、舌識、身識也同樣各依三緣而生。到了意識,意作等無間緣,當下生起的作意作增上緣,法處作所緣緣,由這三緣生起意識及其相應法。如此,六識身及其相應法都由三緣而流轉,也就是增上緣、所緣緣、等無間緣。若能對這些內處、外處所作的緣得到善巧,便名為處善巧。

(四)緣起善巧。什麼是緣起?什麼是緣起善巧?緣起是:無明為緣而有行,行為緣而有識,識為緣而有名色,名色為緣而有六處,六處為緣而有觸,觸為緣而有受,受為緣而有愛,愛為緣而有取,取為緣而有有,有為緣而有生,生為緣而有老死,乃至由此招集成整個純大苦蘊。這就名為緣起。

什麼是緣起善巧?就是了知只有諸法滋潤諸法、只有諸法同等滋潤諸法、只有諸行引發諸行,並沒有離法之外的作者。那些諸行由因而生、由緣而生,原本沒有而後來生起,生起以後又散壞滅去,所以它們的體性無常。因為無常,它們就是會生的法、會老的法、會病的法、會死的法,也是會有愁、憔悴、悲、嘆、憂、苦、惱的法。因為它們是會生乃至會惱的法,所以名為苦;因為是苦,便不得自在,力量羸弱。由這個道理,可以確定其中沒有一個主宰的我。若能對這些緣生法,以如此種種行相善巧了達,生起無常智、苦智或無我智,這就名為緣起善巧。

(五)處非處善巧。當知處非處善巧,就是緣起善巧中的一種差別。它的差別在於:由處非處善巧,能正確了知因果道理並不是不平等、沒有規律的;善法與不善法各有自己的異熟果。各種善法能感得可愛的異熟果,各種不善法能感得不可愛的異熟果。若能如此如實了知,便名為處非處善巧。

這五善巧略則為二:自相善巧(由蘊善巧顯)與共相善巧(由餘四善巧顯)。如是總名善巧所緣。

二、淨惑所緣(斷惑·世間道+出世間道)

什麼是淨惑所緣?就是觀「下地麁性、上地靜性」——如欲界對初靜慮,乃至無所有處對非想非非想處。

什麼是麁性?麁性有二種:一、體麁性,二、數麁性。

什麼是體麁性?以欲界對照初靜慮來說,雖然兩地都具足五蘊,但欲界中的過患深重,苦惱的住處增上,是最鄙劣、最可厭惡的,所以說欲界具有體麁性。初靜慮卻不是如此;初靜慮極為寂靜、極為微妙,所以說它具有體靜性。

什麼是數麁性?欲界色蘊有許多不同品類,都應當了知、應當斷除;受蘊、想蘊、行蘊乃至識蘊也同樣有許多應知應斷的品類,所以說欲界具有數麁性。像這樣,各個上地展轉與下地相比,無論是體麁性還是數麁性,都應當依其相應情形了知。從欲界逐層比較到無所有處,一切下地都是苦惱增多、壽量減少,一切上地都是苦惱減少、壽量增多;非想非非想處只有寂靜、只有微妙,因為再沒有更高的地勝過它。

簡要說來,「有過患」就是麁性的意思。某一地的過患較多,便由過患增多而名為麁性;某一地的過患較少,便由過患減少而名為靜性。這是世間行者依世俗道而修的淨惑所緣。為什麼?因為他把下地的許多過患觀為疾病、毒瘡、毒箭,觀見它沒有安隱的性質,所以把下地觀為麁;又把上地觀為與此相反,所以觀為靜。由此斷除下地所有煩惱,從欲界開始,逐層直到最上的無所有處。但這只是暫時斷除,不是究竟斷除,因為以後那些煩惱還會相續生起。

出世間道淨惑所緣有四種:一、苦聖諦,二、集聖諦,三、滅聖諦,四、道聖諦。

什麼是苦聖諦?就是生苦、老苦、病苦、死苦、怨憎會苦、愛別離苦、求不得苦;簡要總說,就是一切五取蘊苦。這名為苦聖諦。

什麼是集聖諦?就是愛、後有愛、與喜貪共同運行的愛,以及對彼彼境界生起喜樂的愛等。這名為集聖諦。

什麼是滅聖諦?就是上述愛等煩惱無餘斷除、無餘止滅。這名為滅聖諦。

什麼是道聖諦?就是八支聖道等正道。這名為道聖諦。

應知四聖諦是依黑品、白品各自的果與因而建立:苦諦是黑品的果,集諦是黑品的因;滅諦是白品的果,道諦是白品的因,因為道能令行者得到並證得滅。又可譬喻說:苦諦如病,最初應當遍知;集諦如病的因緣,其次應當遠離;滅諦如沒有疾病,其次應當親自觸證;道諦如良藥,又應當修習並多加修習。

又從苦諦的苦義直到道諦的道義,都是如實如此,並非不如實;都是沒有顛倒,並非顛倒,所以名為「諦」。它們各自的相沒有虛妄欺誑;如實見到它們時,便有不顛倒的覺慧運轉。因此名為諦。

問:為什麼這些諦只名為「聖諦」?答:只有諸聖者一致認定這些諦確實是諦,並且能如實了知、如實觀見;一切愚夫都不能如實了知、如實觀見,所以這些諦只名為聖諦。又對愚夫來說,只因法爾如此而說它們是諦,並不是由於愚夫已經覺悟;對諸聖者來說,則同時具足法爾如此與親自覺悟二種理由。

又,所謂生苦,是說有情出生時會發生種種身體與心理的苦受;並不是「生」的自體就是苦,而是因為生能作苦受的因緣,所以名為生苦。從老苦、病苦、死苦、怨憎會苦、愛別離苦一直到求不得苦,也都應作同樣理解。例如求不得苦,是由所求不能得到這個因緣,發生種種身心苦受;並不是「求不得」的自體就是苦,而是它能作苦受的因緣,所以名為苦。

應知簡要總說的一切五取蘊苦,是以生苦等不同門徑顯明「苦苦」;而由五取蘊苦,也顯明其餘的「壞苦」與「行苦」。為什麼?五取蘊具足攝受苦受、樂受、不苦不樂受三種受,所以既能作前述苦苦的容器,其中也具足前面還沒有明說的壞苦與行苦。

問:為什麼世尊只把「苦苦」用它自己的名稱直接說出,而把壞苦、行苦改用其他門徑來說?答:因為對苦苦,不論凡夫或聖者,一切人都同樣會生起覺知是苦的智慧;苦苦的性質又極可厭患;從來沒有修習智慧的人,一聽到苦苦也很容易明白;而且直接說苦苦,能使在四諦中可以調伏、可以教化的有情容易趣入。因此世尊直接說苦苦。

怎樣建立三種苦性

第一,建立苦苦性。前面所說的生苦直到求不得苦,顯示的就是苦受以及苦受所依的身心處所,這些名為苦苦性。與這些苦相對、能治這些苦的法是:年少是衰老所對治的法,無病是疾病所對治的法,生命是死亡所對治的法,與親愛者相聚是怨憎會所對治的法,不與不可愛者別離是愛別離所對治的法,所求如願成就是求不得所對治的法。

第二,建立壞苦性。苦受及其所依處所生起的煩惱,無病等隨順樂受的處所、那些處所所生的樂受,以及由它們所生起的煩惱,總合起來都說為壞苦性。這裡的樂受及其所依處,由於無常而發生變化、成為異樣時,有情便受領由它們增上所生的眾苦。各種煩惱在任何地方生起時,也會纏縛其心、令心變壞,當下生出眾苦,所以名為壞苦。正如世尊所說:「心進入變壞,便執持女人之手。」又如經中說:住在貪欲纏中,便領受以貪欲纏為緣所生的身心憂苦;住在瞋恚、惛沈睡眠、掉舉惡作、疑等纏中,也各自領受以那些纏為緣所生的身心憂苦。由這些至教,可以在煩惱中見到苦義,也見到變壞義,所以說煩惱屬於壞苦性。這就名為建立壞苦性。

第三,建立行苦性。行苦遍行在一切五取蘊中。簡要說來,除去苦苦性,除去煩惱所攝的壞苦性,也除去樂受及其所依處所攝的壞苦性,其餘一切與不苦不樂受共同運行的諸蘊——無論是由那種受所生的蘊、能生那種受之緣所攝的蘊,或作為那種受生起與安住容器的諸蘊——都名為行苦性。因為這些蘊的性質無常,與生滅相應,帶有一切取著,被三受的麁重所隨逐;它們不安隱,不能脫離苦苦與壞苦,也不能自在運轉。由於具有行苦,所以說它們是苦。這就名為建立行苦性。

又,前面所說的,也名希求,也名欣欲,也名喜樂。這種希求由三門運轉:一是希求後有,二、三是希求境界中的兩種。希求後有,名為後有愛。希求境界又有二種:對已經得到的境界,有與喜著共同運行的愛,這名喜貪俱行愛;對尚未得到的境界,有希求與它和合的愛,這名彼彼喜樂愛。

滅有二種:一、煩惱滅,二、所依滅。道有二種:一、有學道,二、無學道。以上就名為出世間道的淨惑所緣。

如此已說四種所緣:一遍滿、二淨行、三善巧、四淨惑。〔所緣一目竟。〕

三、教授(四教授+諸相圓滿教授)

什麼是教授?教授有四種:一、無倒教授,二、漸次教授,三、教教授,四、證教授。

什麼是無倒教授?就是不顛倒地宣說正法與法義,使學人受持、讀誦、修學,因而如實出離,正確窮盡眾苦,做到苦的邊際。這就名為無倒教授。

什麼是漸次教授?就是配合時機與根器宣說法義:先使學人受持、讀誦淺近的法,然後才使他學習深遠之處。又為使他最初進入聖諦現觀,先教苦諦,然後教集、滅、道諦;為使他得到靜慮等至,先教最初靜慮等至,然後再教其餘靜慮等至。這些同類的次第教法,都名為漸次教授。

什麼是教教授?就是從尊重者、與尊重者相似而通達瑜伽的軌範師或親教師、諸如來,或佛弟子處聽聞正教,再完全依照所聞之教,不增加也不減少地教授他人。這就名為教教授。

什麼是證教授?就是把自己獨處空閑時所得、所觸、所證的諸法,為了使他人也能得到、觸及、證得,而以方便善巧教授他人。這就名為證教授。

另外還有諸相圓滿教授。它是怎樣圓滿的?就是由三種神變教授:一、神境神變,二、記說神變,三、教誡神變。由神境神變,能顯現種種神通境界,使他人對自己生起極大尊重;他既生尊重,對正在傾聽的瑜伽作意便極生恭敬。由記說神變,能尋求並了知他人心行的差別。由教誡神變,能依學人的根、行與所悟入處為他宣說正法,對他的修行作正確教誡。因此,三種神變能攝受一切相狀圓滿的教授。

〔本地分中聲聞地第十三第二瑜伽處之三〕

四、學(三勝學)

什麼是學?三勝學:一增上戒學、二增上心學、三增上慧學。  增上戒學=安住具戒等(如前廣說)。  增上心學=離欲惡不善法,有尋有伺、離生喜樂,入初靜慮乃至第四靜慮具足安住;諸無色及其餘等持等至也都名增上心學。然而依靜慮才能最初入聖諦現觀、得正性離生(不是全離靜慮能成此事),故靜慮最殊勝,偏說為增上心學。  增上慧學=於四聖諦等的如實智見。

問:何緣唯有三學,不少不多?答:由「建立定」義(增上戒——戒立心一境性,令心觸三摩地)、「智所依」義(增上心——正定令於所知事有如實智見轉)、「辨所作」義(增上慧——清淨智見能證究竟煩惱斷,斷惑是自義利、勝所作,過此更無),故唯三學。

問:何緣三學如是次第?答:先清淨尸羅便無憂悔,無憂悔故歡喜安樂,由樂故心得正定,定故能如實知見,如實知見故能起厭,厭故離染,離染故得解脫,解脫故證無作究竟涅槃。故三學如是次第。

問:何緣名「增上」戒心慧?答:由「所趣義」與「最勝義」。所趣義=為趣增上心而修淨戒(名增上戒學)、為趣增上慧而修定心(名增上心學)、為趣煩惱斷而修智見(名增上慧學)。最勝義=這三學唯聖教獨有、不共外道。

又或有增上心學引發增上慧學、或有增上慧學引發增上心學(如聖弟子未得根本靜慮,先學見跡,後為斷修道煩惱而修念覺支乃至捨覺支,即慧引發心)。又:有增上戒學而無增上心慧者、有增上戒心而無慧者,卻沒有「有增上慧而無戒無心」者——故若有增上慧學,必定具足三學。瑜伽師應於此三學勤修。

又有三種補特伽羅依三學入諦現觀:未離欲、倍離欲、已離欲——全未離欲者勤修入諦現觀,得現觀已證預流果;倍離欲者證一來果;已離欲者證不還果。

又有三根:未知欲知根(於諸諦未現觀而加行勤修者)、已知根(於諸諦已現觀而居有學者)、具知根(阿羅漢所作已辦、住無學位者)。

又有三解脫門:空、無願、無相。所知境略有二——「有」與「非有」;有又分有為(三界五蘊)、無為(涅槃),合說名「有」;若說我、有情、命者、生者等即是「非有」。於有為見過失過患故無所祈願,依此立無願解脫門;無祈願故便於涅槃深生祈願(見極寂靜、甚微妙、永出離),依此立無相解脫門;於非有中非有祈願非無祈願,如其非有知為非有、見為非有,依此立空解脫門

五、隨順學法(十違逆·十隨順·十想·四光明)

什麼是隨順學法?有十種違逆學法,對治它們故有十種隨順學法。

十種違逆學法:一、母邑(女色)少年盛壯可愛形色(正修學者的上品障礙);二、於薩迦耶諸行生愛著;三、嬾墮懈怠;四、薩迦耶見;五、依段食貪著美味;六、於世間種種戲論所思念中發欲貪愛;七、思惟諸法瑜伽作意的種種過患——這又有十一種:(1)於諦寶蘊業果猶豫疑惑、(2)樂修斷者身諸麁重、(3)慢緩者於修止觀過患作意被惛沈睡眠映蔽令心極略、(4)太猛精進者身疲心惱、(5)太劣精進者不得勝進善品衰退、(6)於少利養名譽稱讚隨一樂中深生欣喜、(7)掉舉不靜踊躍躁擾、(8)於薩迦耶永滅涅槃而生驚恐、(9)於諸言說作非量加行、言論太過、好折伏起諍、(10)於先所見聞受種種境界心馳心散、(11)不應思處而強沈思;八、於諸靜慮等至樂中深生愛味;九、樂欲證入無相定者於諸行中隨順流散;十、觸身苦受乃至奪命苦受時貪愛壽命希望存活、隨此傷歎迷悶。這名十種違逆學法。

對治這十種的十想:一不淨想、二無常想、三無常苦想、四苦無我想、五厭逆食想、六一切世間不可樂想、七光明想、八離欲想、九滅想、十死想。善修這十想能斷十種障礙違逆學法。其中「光明想」依四光明而立:法光明、義光明、奢摩他光明、毘鉢舍那光明(今此義中,意取能斷「思惟諸法瑜伽作意障礙」者)。

又有十種隨順學法。哪十種?一、宿因,二、隨順教,三、如理加行,四、無間殷重所作,五、猛利樂欲,六、持瑜伽力,七、止息身心麁重,八、數數觀察,九、無有怯弱,十、離增上慢。

什麼是宿因?就是先前所修習的各根已經成熟,諸根所需資糧已經積集。

什麼是隨順教?就是所宣說的教法沒有顛倒,而且次第井然。

什麼是如理加行?就是完全依照所受教法,沒有顛倒地修行;如此修行能生起正見。

什麼是無間殷重所作?就是由正確加行的緣故,對各種善品不讓生命空過而白白捨棄,並能迅速積習所有善法。

什麼是猛利樂欲?就是有人對上等解脫生起強烈希慕,心想:「我什麼時候才能像諸聖者一樣,在那解脫處具足安住?」

什麼是持瑜伽力?有二種因緣能使行者獲得維持瑜伽的力量:一、本性是利根,二、長時不斷串習修行。

什麼是止息身心麁重?有人因身體勞累疲乏而生身麁重與心麁重,這可藉由容易舒展的威儀使它止息;有人因尋思、伺察過多而生身心麁重,這可藉由使內心寂止的方便止息;有人因心收縮低劣,被惛沈睡眠纏繞而生身心麁重,這可藉由依增上慧法修毗鉢舍那、作隨順清淨的作意而止息;有人因本性煩惱尚未斷除,仍有煩惱品的身心麁重不能捨離,這可藉由相續不斷地勤修正道而止息。

什麼是數數觀察?就是依止尸羅,一再觀察不應作的惡行而不作,一再觀察應作的善行而去作;對尚未作的惡行不使它發生,對尚未作的善行不令自己退轉,對已作的惡行加以棄捨,對已作的善行不加捨棄。又由觀察煩惱已斷、未斷的作意增上力,一再觀察:若知道煩惱已斷,便生歡喜;若知道還未斷,便一再勤修正道。

什麼是無有怯弱?行者對以後應當了知、應當見到、應當證得的法,因為現在尚未知、未見、未證,可能生起怯弱,使心勞倦、使心匱乏;這怯弱生起以後,他不牢牢執持,能迅速斷滅。

什麼是離增上慢?就是對自己所得、所觸、所證之法,沒有未得謂得的增上慢,遠離顛倒執著;只對真正所得之法生所得想,對真正所觸之法生所觸想,對真正所證之法生所證想。

以上十法,是喜愛修學的瑜伽師所應修學的法;它們在修學的初時、中時、後時都恒常隨順,沒有違逆,所以名為隨順學法。

六、瑜伽壞(四種)

什麼是瑜伽壞?略有四種:畢竟、暫時、退失所得、邪行所作。  畢竟瑜伽壞=無種姓補特伽羅——身中無能趣涅槃之法,畢竟失壞出世瑜伽。  暫時瑜伽壞=有種姓補特伽羅——身中有能趣涅槃之法,雖闕外緣、久經時日,終定緣會、修習瑜伽令現起,善修已當般涅槃,故說其瑜伽暫時失壞。  退失所得瑜伽壞=退失已得已觸已證的智、見、安樂住。  邪行所作瑜伽壞=不如正理精勤修行,雖多用功,仍無所成辦,不能成辦一切瑜伽,也不是善法。又有一種人:煩惱眾多、本性多有塵穢,卻識性聰銳、覺慧猛利,成就俱生覺,善能攝持所聞;無論所聞少或多,都能在聽聞上達到究竟。他或住在空閑處,有本性質直的在家人與出家人來到他那裡,他便為他們說法,使其心歡喜;又行矯詐,妄現種種身語相應的調善所作。因此招集利養、恭敬、稱頌,被人作大福德想,又得到種種衣服、飲食、臥具、病緣醫藥及資身什物;國王、大臣、居士乃至饒財長者、商主都恭敬尊重他,咸謂他是阿羅漢。他又對隨他迴轉的出家或在家弟子戀著親愛,為了招引更多人,便想:「這些出家、在家弟子信順於我,咸謂我是阿羅漢。若他們依瑜伽作意、止觀等處來請問我,我得到他們的問題卻不能回答,他們便會捨棄對我的信向,不再謂我是阿羅漢;由此我會失去利養恭敬。所以我現在應當自己思惟、籌量、觀察,安立瑜伽。」他受這件事的增上力所驅,耽著利養恭敬名譽,獨處空閑,自己如實思惟、籌量、觀察,安立瑜伽。然而這套瑜伽「不順契經、不現戒律、違逆法性」。對於善持三藏的比丘,他覆藏自己的瑜伽,不肯開示;對在家、出家弟子,則私下竊自教示,不令彰顯。為什麼?他恐怕善持三藏教法的人聽到這瑜伽處後,以經檢驗,發現它不順契經;以律顯照,發現它不現戒律;以法觀察,發現它違逆法性。由此他們便不信受,以不信之語詰難他、與他諍競並舉發他;國王、大臣、居士乃至饒財長者、商主便不再恭敬尊重他,他也不再得到衣服、飲食、臥具、病緣醫藥及資身什物。他由貪著利養恭敬的增上力,於非法中起法想、起覆藏想、起惡欲樂,把非法顯發開示為法;容忍、認可他所見的人,也於非法起法想,愚昧頑鈍,雖依他的教法精進修行,應知一切都是邪行。這名邪行所作瑜伽失壞——「像似正法、非真正法、能障正法」。修靜慮的瑜伽師對這四種瑜伽壞應正遍知、當遠捨離。

七、瑜伽(四瑜伽:信欲精進方便)

什麼是瑜伽?瑜伽有四種。哪四種?一、信,二、欲,三、精進,四、方便。

應知有二種行相與二種依處。二種行相是:一、信順行相,二、清淨行相。二種依處是:一、觀察諸法道理的依處,二、信解補特伽羅神力的依處。

有四種。哪四種?一、為證得欲,二、為請問欲,三、為修集資糧欲,四、為隨順瑜伽欲。為證得欲,是對上等解脫生起希慕,如前面所詳說。為請問欲,是有人生起希慕以後,前往僧伽藍,拜訪有識、同修梵行而成就瑜伽妙智的人,為了聽聞未曾聽聞的法,也為了把已聞之法聽到究竟。為修集資糧欲,是有人為使戒律儀清淨、根律儀清淨,並在飲食知量、減少睡眠、正知而住等法上展轉增勝,因而生起希慕。為隨順瑜伽欲,是在以無間加行、殷重加行修道時,生起希慕、欣樂與想要有所作為的願欲。

精進有四種。哪四種?一、為聞精進,二、為思精進,三、為修精進,四、為障淨精進。為聞精進,是為了聽未曾聽聞的法、使已聞之法達到究竟,而以勤奮勇猛之心作審決加行。為思精進,是依自己所聞之法,獨處空閑,思惟其義,籌量、觀察。為修精進,是進入寂靜處,在不同時段勤修止觀。為障淨精進,是晝夜策勵精勤地經行、宴坐,從各種障礙法中淨修其心,以勤奮勇猛之心審決精進。

方便有四種相續次第:由尸羅律儀的增上力而善守其念;由善守其念而能不放逸,防護其心,修習諸善法;由不放逸而使心正確地向內修奢摩他,也修增上慧法的毗鉢舍那。由此分成四種方便。

以上四類瑜伽各有四種,合成十六種。應知最初由信,對應當證得之義深生信解;既信解那應得之義,便對各種善法生起樂欲;由有樂欲,便日夜策勵,安住於精勤、堅固、勇猛;發起精進以後,再攝受種種方便,於是能得到未得、觸及未觸、證得未證。因此,這四種法說名為瑜伽。

八、作意(四作意+餘四+四相+九勝解+四所作+三瑜伽師)

什麼是作意?四作意:力勵運轉、有間運轉、無間運轉、無功用運轉。  力勵運轉作意=初修業者令心於內安住等住、或於諸法無倒簡擇,乃至未得所修作意時,倍勵其力折挫其心令住一境。  有間運轉作意=已得所修作意後,世出世道漸次勝進的了相作意,因被三摩地之「思」間雜、未能一向純修。  無間運轉作意=從了相作意已後,乃至加行究竟作意。  無功用運轉作意=加行究竟果作意。

又有餘四種作意:隨順作意(於所緣深生厭壞、起正加行而未斷惑)、對治作意(能斷惑)、順清淨作意(心下蹙時取淨妙相策令歡悅)、順觀察作意(觀察煩惱斷與未斷)。

問:於所緣境正作意時思惟幾相?答:四相——所緣相(所知事同分影像明了顯現)、因緣相(三摩地資糧積集、隨順教導、與修俱行猛利樂欲、於可厭法深生厭患、能審遍知亂與不亂、令他不惱觸(擾亂之相或人所作、或非人作、或音聲作、或功用作);若毗鉢舍那為上首則內略其心極猛盛觀之後因緣相,若奢摩他為上首則發起勝觀極猛盛止之後因緣相)、應遠離相(四種:沈相令心下劣、掉相令心高舉、著相令心於境起染著惱亂、亂相令心於外馳散擾動,如等引地已說)、應修習相。

問:作意於所緣起勝解時有幾勝解?答:九——有光淨勝解(於光明相澄心善取、與光明俱)、無光淨勝解(不能善取、與闇昧俱)、遲鈍勝解(鈍根身中)、捷利勝解(利根身中)、狹小勝解(狹小信欲及狹小所緣)、廣大勝解(廣大信欲及廣大所緣)、無量勝解(無邊信欲及無邊所緣)、清淨勝解(已善修成滿究竟俱行)、不清淨勝解(未善修成滿究竟俱行)。

問:修瑜伽者有幾種瑜伽所作?答:四——所依滅、所依轉、遍知所緣、愛樂所緣。所依滅及所依轉=勤修瑜伽作意故,麁重俱行所依漸滅、輕安俱行所依漸轉。遍知所緣及愛樂所緣=或以所依滅轉為上首(由遍知愛樂所緣增上令所依滅轉),或以所依清淨為上首(由所依清淨增上令遍知愛樂所緣得善清淨、於所作成辦時轉)。

問:修瑜伽師有幾種?答:三——初修業瑜伽師、已習行瑜伽師、已度作意瑜伽師。  初修業瑜伽師有二:於作意初修業者(安住一緣勤修作意,未得所修作意、未觸心一境性)、淨煩惱初修業者(已證所修作意,於諸煩惱欲淨其心,發起、攝受並正勤修習了相作意)。  已習行瑜伽師=除了相作意,於其餘乃至加行究竟的五作意中已善修習。  已度作意瑜伽師=住加行究竟果作意位、超過加行方便所修作意、安住修果。  又:從修習善法欲起、乃至未起順決擇分善根,名初修業;已起順決擇分善根(煖、頂、隨順諦忍、世第一法)名已習行;已證入正性離生、得諦現觀、不由他緣、於佛聖教不為餘緣引奪,名已度作意(超過他緣作意、住非他緣作意)。

Continuing from the first two of the four objects (the pervasive object and the purifying-of-conduct object), this unit sets out the latter two objects — the skillfulness objects (the five skillfulnesses: in the aggregates, the elements, the sense-fields, dependent origination, and the possible-and-impossible; these cure delusion) and the affliction-purifying objects (by the mundane path, contemplating the coarse and the calm; by the supramundane path, contemplating the four truths; these sever the afflictions). With this, the four kinds of object are stated in full. Then it goes on, in order, to the six rubrics of the training within the Second Yoga-Station: instruction · the training · dharmas that accord with the training · the ruin of yoga · yoga · attention. The technical terms are left as they stand; every phrase is rendered into today's language, with no doctrinal addition, no citation of treatises, and no annotation of Sanskrit; where the treatise-text is compressed, it is filled back out within 〔…〕.

One · The Skillfulness Objects (Curing Delusion · the Five Skillfulnesses)

What are the skillfulness objects? In brief there are five kinds: first, skill in the aggregates; second, skill in the elements; third, skill in the sense-fields; fourth, skill in dependent origination; fifth, skill in the possible-and-impossible.

(1) Skill in the aggregates. What are the aggregates, and what is skill in the aggregates? There are five aggregates: the form aggregate, feeling aggregate, perception aggregate, formations aggregate, and consciousness aggregate.

What is the form aggregate? All form whatsoever consists of the four great elements—earth, water, fire, and wind—and form derived from those four great elements. All such form is further distinguished as past, future, or present; inner or outer; coarse or fine; inferior or superior; far or near. Taken together, all of it is named the form aggregate.

What is the feeling aggregate? It includes feelings that arise with contact conducive to pleasure as their condition, feelings that arise with contact conducive to pain as their condition, and feelings that arise with contact conducive to neither pain nor pleasure as their condition. It also includes the six bodies of feeling: feeling born of eye-contact, ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact. Taken together, all of these are named the feeling aggregate.

What is the perception aggregate? It includes perception with marks, perception without marks, small perception, vast perception, measureless perception, and the perception of the sphere of nothing-whatever, in which nothing at all is perceived as present. It also includes the six bodies of perception: perception born of eye-contact, ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact. Taken together, all of these are named the perception aggregate.

What is the formations aggregate? It includes the six bodies of volition: volition born of eye-contact, ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact. It also includes all the remaining mental factors apart from feeling and perception. Taken together, all of these are named the formations aggregate.

What is the consciousness aggregate? It is mind, mentation, and consciousness, and it also includes the six bodies of consciousness: eye-, ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mental consciousness. Taken together, all of these are named the consciousness aggregate. The feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness aggregates all have, as does form, the distinctions of past, future, and present; inner and outer; coarse and fine; inferior and superior; far and near. These are what is named the five aggregates.

What is skill in the aggregates? It is to know well the manifold differences among the aggregates, to know that each aggregate is not a single thing but has many classes, and to know that apart from these aggregate-dharmas nothing further can be found or discriminated. This is the meaning of skill in the aggregates stated in brief.

What is their manifold differentiation? The form aggregate is distinct from the feeling aggregate, feeling from perception, perception from formations, and formations from consciousness; each of the five is distinct. This is named manifold differentiation.

What is their character of not being one but many? The form aggregate, for example, is not a single thing but has many classes: the great elements differ from the forms derived from them, and the classes of past, future, present, and so forth also differ. This is the form aggregate's not being one but many. The remaining four aggregates should be understood in the same way, each according to its corresponding distinctions.

What does it mean that apart from these dharmas nothing further can be found or discriminated? Only the aggregates can be found, and only bare events can be found. Apart from the aggregates, no self can be found; no permanent, enduring, unchanging dharma can be found; and not even the least dharma can be found that is truly "mine." Therefore, apart from the aggregates, nothing further can be found or discriminated.

(2) Skill in the elements. What are the elements, and what is skill in the elements? There are eighteen elements: the eye-, form-, and eye-consciousness-elements; the ear-, sound-, and ear-consciousness-elements; the nose-, smell-, and nose-consciousness-elements; the tongue-, taste-, and tongue-consciousness-elements; the body-, tangible-, and body-consciousness-elements; and the mind-, dharma-, and mental-consciousness-elements. These are named the eighteen elements. If one knows as it truly is, accepts, and carefully examines that each of these eighteen dharmas arises and appears from its own distinct element, seed, and lineage, this is named skill in the elements. To know as it truly is that the eighteen dharmas each turn from a distinct element is to become skillful regarding their causes and conditions. Hence it is named skill in the elements.

(3) Skill in the sense-fields. What are the sense-fields, and what is skill in the sense-fields? There are twelve sense-fields: the eye- and form-fields; ear- and sound-fields; nose- and smell-fields; tongue- and taste-fields; body- and tangible-fields; mind- and dharma-fields. These are named the twelve sense-fields.

What is skill in the sense-fields? For eye-consciousness, the eye serves as dominant condition, form as object-condition, and the just-ceased mentation as immediately antecedent condition; these three give rise to eye-consciousness and its associated dharmas. For ear-consciousness, the ear serves as dominant condition, sound as object-condition, and the just-ceased mentation as immediately antecedent condition; these three give rise to ear-consciousness and its associated dharmas. Nose-, tongue-, and body-consciousness arise in the corresponding way. For mental consciousness, mentation serves as immediately antecedent condition, the attention arising now as dominant condition, and dharmas as object-condition; these give rise to mental consciousness and its associated dharmas. Thus the six bodies of consciousness and their associated dharmas all flow through three conditions: dominant condition, object-condition, and immediately antecedent condition. One who becomes skillful regarding the conditions furnished by these inner and outer sense-fields is named skillful in the sense-fields.

(4) Skill in dependent origination. What is dependent origination, and what is skill in dependent origination? Dependent origination is this: ignorance conditions formations; formations condition consciousness; consciousness conditions name-and-form; name-and-form conditions the six sense-fields; the six sense-fields condition contact; contact conditions feeling; feeling conditions craving; craving conditions grasping; grasping conditions becoming; becoming conditions birth; and birth conditions aging and death, thereby amassing this entire great mass of suffering. This is named dependent origination.

What is skill in dependent origination? It is to know that only dharmas moisten dharmas, only dharmas evenly moisten dharmas, and only formations draw forth formations; no agent stands apart from them. Those formations are born from causes and conditions. Originally absent, they come to be; having come to be, they scatter and cease. Their nature is therefore impermanent. Because they are impermanent, they are dharmas subject to birth, aging, sickness, and death, and to sorrow, wasting away, grief, lamentation, distress, pain, and vexation. Because they are subject to birth through vexation, they are suffering. Because they are suffering, they are not under mastery and their power is weak. For this reason, it is certain that there is no self in them. To comprehend these dependently arisen dharmas skillfully in such modes, through knowledge of impermanence, suffering, or no-self, is named skill in dependent origination.

(5) Skill in the possible and impossible. This should be known as a particular differentiation of skill in dependent origination. Through it one rightly understands that the principle of cause and effect is not irregular or uneven: wholesome and unwholesome dharmas each have their distinct maturation. Wholesome dharmas can produce agreeable results of maturation, while unwholesome dharmas can produce disagreeable results. To know this as it truly is is named skill in the possible and impossible.

These five skillfulnesses, in brief, come to two: skill in the particular character (shown by skill in the aggregates) and skill in the common character (shown by the remaining four skillfulnesses). Thus, all together, these are named the skillfulness objects.

Two · The Affliction-Purifying Objects (Severing the Afflictions · the Mundane Path and the Supramundane Path)

What are the affliction-purifying objects? They are the contemplation of "the coarseness of the lower ground and the calmness of the upper ground" — as with the desire-realm set against the first meditative absorption, on up to the sphere of nothing-whatever set against the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.

What is coarseness? Coarseness is of two kinds: first, coarseness of substance; second, coarseness of number.

What is coarseness of substance? Compared with the first absorption, the desire realm has the five aggregates just as the first absorption does, but its faults and troubles are deep and heavy, painful dwelling predominates there, and it is exceedingly inferior and repellent. Therefore, the desire realm is said to be coarse in substance. The first absorption is not like this: it is exceedingly calm and sublime, and so it is said to be calm in substance.

What is coarseness of number? The form aggregate in the desire realm has many distinct classes that must be known and severed. The feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness aggregates likewise have many such classes. Therefore, the desire realm is said to be coarse in number. As each higher ground is compared in turn with the ground below it, both coarseness of substance and coarseness of number should be understood according to what is appropriate. From the desire realm through the sphere of nothing-whatever, every lower ground has more suffering and a shorter lifespan, while every higher ground has less suffering and a longer lifespan. The sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception is only calm and sublime, because no higher ground surpasses it.

In brief, having faults and troubles is the meaning of coarseness. A ground with more faults is named coarse precisely because its faults are more numerous; a ground with fewer faults is named calm precisely because its faults are fewer. This is the affliction-purifying object of the mundane conventional path. Why? The practitioner contemplates the many faults of a lower ground as a disease, a boil, or a poisoned arrow, seeing it as insecure, and therefore regards it as coarse. He contemplates the higher ground as the opposite and therefore regards it as calm. In this way he severs the afflictions of each lower ground in turn, from the desire realm through the sphere of nothing-whatever. Yet this severance is only temporary, not ultimate, because the afflictions will later resume their continuity.

The affliction-purifying object of the supramundane path is of four kinds: first, the noble truth of suffering; second, the noble truth of origination; third, the noble truth of cessation; fourth, the noble truth of the path.

What is the noble truth of suffering? It is the suffering of birth, aging, sickness, death, union with what is hated, separation from what is loved, and not obtaining what one seeks. Stated briefly, it is all the suffering of the five appropriated aggregates. This is named the noble truth of suffering.

What is the noble truth of origination? It is craving, craving for further becoming, craving accompanied by delight and greed, and craving that delights in this or that object. This is named the noble truth of origination.

What is the noble truth of cessation? It is the severance and cessation without remainder of that craving and the other afflictions. This is named the noble truth of cessation.

What is the noble truth of the path? It is the noble path with eight limbs and the other factors of the path. This is named the noble truth of the path.

The four truths are established through the causes and results of the dark and bright classes. Suffering is the result of the dark class, and origination its cause. Cessation is the result of the bright class, and the path its cause, because the path enables one to attain and realize cessation. Suffering is like a disease and must first be fully known. Origination is like the cause of disease and must next be abandoned. Cessation is like freedom from disease and must next be personally realized. The path is like good medicine and must be cultivated repeatedly.

Moreover, the suffering meant by the truth of suffering through the path meant by the truth of the path are just so and real, not otherwise than real; they are undistorted, not distorted. Thus they are called truths. Their own characteristics contain no falsity or deception, and on seeing them an undistorted cognition arises. For this reason they are named truths.

Question: Why are these truths named specifically "noble" truths? Answer: Only noble ones agree that these truths are indeed truths and know and see them as they truly are. Ordinary, childish beings neither know nor see them as they truly are. Therefore these truths are named specifically noble truths. For ordinary beings they are called truths only because their nature is so, not because those beings have awakened to them. For noble ones, both reasons apply: their nature is so, and the noble ones have awakened to them.

Again, the suffering of birth means the various painful bodily and mental feelings that arise at the time of birth. It is not that birth's own substance is itself suffering; birth is called suffering because it is a cause and condition for painful feelings. Aging, sickness, death, union with what is hated, separation from what is loved, and not obtaining what one seeks should be understood in the same way. In the last case, failure to obtain what is sought causes various painful bodily and mental feelings. It is not that failure itself is intrinsically suffering; it is called suffering because it serves as a condition for suffering.

The brief expression "all suffering of the five appropriated aggregates" should be understood as follows. Birth and the other headings directly reveal only the suffering that is suffering. The suffering of the five appropriated aggregates also reveals the other two, the suffering of change and the suffering of conditioned formations. Why? The five appropriated aggregates include all three kinds of feeling. They are therefore a vessel for the suffering already described and also contain the not-yet-explicit suffering of change and suffering of conditioned formations.

Question: Why did the World-Honored One state the suffering that is suffering directly by its own name, while stating the suffering of change and the suffering of conditioned formations through other headings? Answer: Ordinary and noble beings alike immediately recognize the suffering that is suffering as painful. Its nature is also intensely repellent. A person who has not previously trained in wisdom can understand it as soon as it is explained, and direct explanation of it allows beings capable of being tamed and taught to enter the truths more easily. Therefore it is stated directly.

How are the three characteristics of suffering established?

First, the suffering that is suffering. The suffering of birth through the suffering of not obtaining what one seeks reveals painful feeling and the bodily or mental basis on which it depends. Their opposites are the conditions that counteract them: youth counters aging, health counters sickness, life counters death, union with loved ones counters union with the hated, non-separation from the loved counters separation from the loved, and successful fulfillment of one's aim counters not obtaining what one seeks. This establishes the suffering that is suffering.

Second, the suffering of change. The afflictions arising from painful feeling and its basis, together with healthy and other states conducive to pleasant feeling, the pleasant feelings they produce, and the afflictions arising from those states and feelings, are collectively called the suffering of change. Because pleasant feeling and its basis are impermanent, when they change or become otherwise, one undergoes the many sufferings produced under the dominant force of that change. When afflictions arise anywhere, they bind the mind, damage it, and immediately produce suffering. Thus they are called the suffering of change. As the World-Honored One said, "Entering a changed mind, he grasps a woman's hand." Likewise, one who abides in the entanglement of sensual desire experiences bodily and mental grief and pain produced with that entanglement as condition. The same is true of the entanglements of ill will, dullness and drowsiness, restlessness and remorse, and doubt. These authoritative teachings reveal both suffering and change within affliction. Therefore afflictions are included in the suffering of change. This is the establishment of the suffering of change.

Third, the suffering of conditioned formations. This suffering pervades all five appropriated aggregates. In brief, after excluding the suffering that is suffering, the suffering of change included in affliction, and the suffering of change included in pleasant feeling and its basis, all remaining aggregates that accompany neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling are named the suffering of conditioned formations. This includes aggregates produced by that feeling, aggregates serving as conditions for its production, and aggregates that serve as the vessel in which it arises and abides. These aggregates are impermanent and associated with arising and ceasing; they bear every form of appropriation, are followed by the coarseness and heaviness of all three feelings, are insecure, cannot escape either the suffering that is suffering or the suffering of change, and do not operate under mastery. Because they are subject to the suffering of conditioned formations, they are called suffering. This establishes the suffering of conditioned formations.

The craving mentioned above is also called longing, eager desire, and delight. This longing operates through three gates: longing for future becoming, and two kinds of longing for objects. Longing for future becoming is named craving for further becoming. Longing for objects has two forms. With regard to an object already obtained, craving accompanies delight and attachment; this is craving accompanied by delight and greed. With regard to an object not yet obtained, craving longs for union with it; this is craving that delights in this or that object.

Cessation is of two kinds: first, cessation of the afflictions; second, cessation of the basis. The path is of two kinds: first, the path of the learner; second, the path of the non-learner. This is named the affliction-purifying object of the supramundane path.

Thus have been stated the four kinds of object: first, the pervasive object; second, the purifying-of-conduct object; third, the skillfulness object; fourth, the affliction-purifying object. 〔The rubric of "the object" is now complete.〕

Three · Instruction (the Four Instructions and the Instruction of Perfect Marks)

What is instruction? Instruction is of four kinds: first, unmistaken instruction; second, gradual instruction; third, instruction by teaching; fourth, instruction by realization.

What is unmistaken instruction? It is to explain the Dharma and its meaning without distortion, causing students to receive and retain it, recite it, and train in it so that they truly emerge, rightly exhaust all suffering, and reach suffering's end. This is named unmistaken instruction.

What is gradual instruction? It is to teach the Dharma and its meaning in accord with the time and the students' capacities: first causing them to receive and recite what is shallow and accessible, and only afterward causing them to train in what is deep and far-reaching. To lead them into the first direct realization of the truths, one first teaches suffering and then origination, cessation, and the path. To lead them into meditative absorption and equipoise, one first teaches the first absorption and then the remaining attainments. Instructions of these kinds are named gradual instruction.

What is instruction by teaching? It is to hear the true teaching from a venerable teacher; from one resembling a venerable teacher, such as a preceptor or ordaining teacher versed in yoga; from the Tathāgatas; or from disciples of the Buddha—and then to teach others exactly what was heard, adding nothing and taking nothing away. This is named instruction by teaching.

What is instruction by realization? It is to use skillful means to teach others the dharmas one has personally attained, touched, and realized while dwelling alone in seclusion, so that they too may attain, touch, and realize them. This is named instruction by realization.

There is also instruction complete in every feature. How is it complete? Through instruction by three miracles: the miracle of spiritual power, the miracle of declaration, and the miracle of admonition. Through the miracle of spiritual power, one manifests various extraordinary fields, causing others to feel profound reverence; because they revere the instructor, they listen to the yoga-attention with great respect. Through the miracle of declaration, one discerns the differences in another person's mental conduct. Through the miracle of admonition, one teaches the true Dharma according to the person's faculties, conduct, and point of entry, and gives correct guidance regarding the practice. Thus the three miracles encompass instruction complete in every feature.

〔Within the Basic Section, the Śrāvaka Stage, the thirteenth, the third [portion] of the Second Yoga-Station — 本地分中聲聞地第十三第二瑜伽處之三〕

Four · The Training (the Three Higher Trainings)

What is the training? There are three higher trainings: first, the higher training in discipline; second, the higher training in mind; third, the higher training in wisdom.  The higher training in discipline = dwelling in the possession of the precepts, and so forth (as explained at length before).  The higher training in mind = separated from desires and from evil, unwholesome dharmas, with applied and sustained thought, with the joy-and-pleasure born of seclusion, entering the first meditative absorption and dwelling in its full attainment, on up to being able to enter the fourth meditative absorption and dwell in its full attainment; the formless [attainments] and all the remaining concentrations and equipoises are also all named the higher training in mind. Yet it is in dependence on the meditative absorptions that one can first enter the direct realization of the noble truths and attain the assurance of the right course (this cannot be accomplished by wholly forsaking all the meditative absorptions) — therefore the meditative absorptions are the most excellent, and so [this training] is stated by preference as the higher training in mind.  The higher training in wisdom = the knowledge-and-vision, as they truly are, of the four noble truths and the like.

Question: Why are there only three trainings, neither fewer nor more? Answer: By reason of the sense of "establishing concentration" (the higher discipline — discipline establishes one-pointedness of mind, causing the mind to touch meditative absorption), the sense of "the basis for knowledge" (the higher mind — right concentration causes true knowledge-and-vision to operate with regard to what is to be known), and the sense of "carrying out what is to be done" (the higher wisdom — pure knowledge-and-vision can realize the ultimate severing of the afflictions; severing the afflictions is one's own aim-and-benefit, is the excellent thing to be done, and beyond this there is no further excellent thing to be done) — therefore there are only three trainings.

Question: Why do the three trainings follow this sequence? Answer: First, discipline being purified, there is then no worry-or-remorse; there being no worry-or-remorse, there is gladness-and-ease; by reason of ease, the mind attains right concentration; the mind being concentrated, one can know-and-see as it truly is; knowing-and-seeing truly, one can give rise to disenchantment; being disenchanted, one is freed from defilement; being free from defilement, one attains liberation; being liberated, one realizes the actionless, ultimate nirvāṇa. Therefore the three trainings follow this sequence.

Question: Why are they named the "higher" discipline, mind, and wisdom? Answer: By reason of "the sense of what it tends toward" and "the sense of being most excellent." The sense of what it tends toward = in order to tend toward the higher mind one cultivates pure discipline (named the higher training in discipline); in order to tend toward the higher wisdom one cultivates the concentrated mind (named the higher training in mind); in order to tend toward the severing of the afflictions one cultivates knowledge-and-vision (named the higher training in wisdom). The sense of being most excellent = these three trainings exist solely within the noble teaching, not in common with the outsiders.

Again, there may be a higher training in mind that draws forth the higher training in wisdom, or a higher training in wisdom that draws forth the higher training in mind (as when a noble disciple who has not yet attained the fundamental meditative absorption first trains in seeing-the-traces, and afterward, in order to sever the afflictions to be severed by the path of cultivation, cultivates the awakening-factor of mindfulness on up to the awakening-factor of equanimity — this is wisdom drawing forth mind). Again: there may be a higher training in discipline without the higher training in mind or wisdom; there may be the higher training in discipline and in mind without wisdom; but there is no "higher training in wisdom without discipline and without mind" — therefore, if there is a higher training in wisdom, it necessarily possesses all three trainings. The yoga practitioner should diligently cultivate these three trainings.

There are also three [types of] person who, in dependence on the three trainings, enter the direct realization of the truths: one not yet separated from desire, one twice-separated from desire, and one already separated from desire — one wholly not-yet-separated from desire, diligently cultivating, enters the direct realization of the truths, and having attained the direct realization, realizes the fruit of stream-entry; one twice-separated from desire realizes the fruit of once-returning; one already separated from desire realizes the fruit of non-returning.

There are also three faculties: the faculty of "wishing-to-know-the-not-yet-known" (one who, not having directly realized the truths, applies himself with diligent cultivation), the faculty of "already-knowing" (one who, having directly realized the truths, still dwells as a learner), and the faculty of "one-who-fully-knows" (the arhat, who has done what was to be done and dwells in the non-learner's station).

There are also three gates of liberation: emptiness, wishlessness, and marklessness. The objects to be known are, in brief, of two kinds — "the existent" and "the non-existent." The existent is further divided into the conditioned (the five aggregates of the three realms) and the unconditioned (nirvāṇa), which, spoken of together, are named "the existent"; whereas if one speaks of a self, a sentient being, a life-holder, a being-that-is-born, and the like, that is "the non-existent." Because one sees the faults and troubles within the conditioned, one has nothing to pray-for; and because one has nothing to pray-for, on this basis is established the gate of liberation of wishlessness; because one has nothing to pray-for [within the conditioned], one then gives rise to a deep prayer for nirvāṇa (seeing it as utterly calm, most sublime, forever emerged-and-released), and on this basis is established the gate of liberation of marklessness; and with regard to the non-existent one neither prays-for nor does-not-pray-for — knowing the non-existent for the non-existent just as it is non-existent, seeing it as non-existent — and on this basis is established the gate of liberation of emptiness.

Five · Dharmas That Accord with the Training (the Ten Contraries · the Ten Concordances · the Ten Perceptions · the Four Illuminations)

What are the dharmas that accord with the training? There are ten kinds of dharma contrary to the training; because they counteract these, there are ten kinds of dharma that accord with the training.

The ten kinds of dharma contrary to the training: first, the lovely form of a woman, young, in the flush of vigor (a superior-grade obstacle to the good man and the rest who are rightly training); second, giving rise to clinging-attachment toward the formations included in the false-view-of-self; third, laziness and slackness; fourth, the false view of self; fifth, clinging-attachment to fine tastes in dependence on morsel-food; sixth, giving rise to desire-craving amid the various worldly idle-proliferations one thinks upon; seventh, the faults and troubles [that arise from] reflecting upon the yoga-attention of the various dharmas — this in turn is of eleven kinds: (1) wavering doubt with regard to the truths, the Jewels, the aggregates, and karma-and-fruit; (2) for one who delights in cultivating severance, the coarse-and-heavy states of the body; (3) for one who is lax and slack, being over-shadowed by dullness-and-drowsiness in the attention to the faults-and-troubles of cultivating tranquillity-and-insight, so that the mind becomes utterly shrunk; (4) for one whose vigor is too fierce, the body wearied and the mind vexed; (5) for one whose vigor is too weak, not attaining excellent advancement, and the wholesome qualities declining; (6) with regard to some small gain, fame, or praise — some one pleasure — giving rise to deep delight; (7) restlessness, the un-calm, leaping-and-agitated turmoil; (8) giving rise to alarm-and-terror at the everlasting-cessation-nirvāṇa of the false-view-of-self; (9) with regard to speech, making immoderate exertion, talking to excess, fond of overpowering [others] and stirring up the means of dispute; (10) with regard to the manifold objects previously seen, heard, and received, the mind galloping, the mind scattering; (11) forcibly sinking into thought where one ought not to think; eighth, giving rise to deep relish-and-clinging amid the pleasure of the meditative absorptions and equipoises; ninth, for one who wishes to realize-and-enter the markless concentration, drifting-and-scattering in accordance with the formations; tenth, when one touches bodily painful feelings on up to the life-robbing painful feeling, craving-and-cherishing one's lifespan and hoping to stay alive, and, following upon this hoping, grieving-lamenting and being confused-and-distressed. These are named the ten kinds of dharma contrary to the training.

The ten perceptions that counteract these ten: first, the perception of the impure; second, the perception of impermanence; third, the perception of impermanence-and-suffering; fourth, the perception of suffering-and-no-self; fifth, the perception of loathing-food; sixth, the perception that the whole world is not to be delighted in; seventh, the perception of light; eighth, the perception of dispassion; ninth, the perception of cessation; tenth, the perception of death. Cultivating these ten perceptions well can sever the ten obstacles, the dharmas contrary to the training. Among them, "the perception of light" is established in dependence on the four illuminations: the illumination of the dharma, the illumination of the meaning, the illumination of tranquillity, and the illumination of insight (in the present sense, the intent is to take up that which can sever "the obstacle of the yoga-attention that reflects upon the various dharmas").

There are also ten kinds of dharma that accord with the training. What are the ten? First, a past cause; second, an accordant teaching; third, application in accord with principle; fourth, what is done uninterruptedly and earnestly; fifth, fierce eager desire; sixth, the power to sustain yoga; seventh, stilling the coarseness and heaviness of body and mind; eighth, repeated examination; ninth, freedom from timidity; tenth, freedom from overweening pride.

What is a past cause? It is that faculties cultivated in the past have matured and the necessary capacities have accumulated.

What is an accordant teaching? It is a teaching that is undistorted and presented in proper sequence.

What is application in accord with principle? It is to practice without distortion exactly as instructed. Such practice gives rise to right view.

What is what is done uninterruptedly and earnestly? Through correct application, one does not let one's life pass vainly without cultivating wholesome qualities, and one rapidly accumulates all such qualities.

What is fierce eager desire? One develops a powerful longing for higher liberation, thinking, "When shall I be able to abide fully in that state, as noble ones abide fully there?"

What is the power to sustain yoga? Two causes enable one to obtain this power: being of sharp faculties by nature and having cultivated continuously for a long time.

What is stilling the coarseness and heaviness of body and mind? When physical weariness produces bodily and mental heaviness, a more relaxed posture stills it. When excessive applied and sustained thought produces bodily and mental heaviness, the means of inwardly calming the mind stills it. When a constricted, weakened mind is entangled in dullness and drowsiness and produces bodily and mental heaviness, a purifying attention based on insight into the higher-wisdom Dharma stills it. When innate afflictions not yet severed produce an afflictive heaviness of body and mind that cannot yet be relinquished, continuous diligent cultivation of the true path stills it.

What is repeated examination? Depending on discipline, one repeatedly examines the bad deed that should not be done and the good deed that should be done. One prevents an uncommitted bad deed from occurring, does not retreat from a good deed not yet performed, relinquishes a bad deed already done, and does not abandon a good deed already done. Through the force of attention examining whether afflictions have or have not been severed, one also repeatedly examines them: knowing them severed, one rejoices; knowing them not severed, one repeatedly and diligently cultivates the true path.

What is freedom from timidity? Because one has not yet known, seen, or realized what must later be known, seen, and realized, timidity may arise, wearying and depleting the mind. Once it arises, one does not cling to it but quickly severs and extinguishes it.

What is freedom from overweening pride? One has no overweening pride regarding what has been attained, touched, or realized and is free from distorted grasping. One forms the thought "attained" only regarding what has truly been attained, "touched" only regarding what has truly been touched, and "realized" only regarding what has truly been realized.

These ten dharmas should be cultivated by yoga practitioners who delight in training. At the beginning, middle, and end they remain constantly accordant and never contrary. Therefore they are named dharmas that accord with the training.

Six · The Ruin of Yoga (Four Kinds)

What is the ruin of yoga? In brief there are four kinds: the final, the temporary, the loss of what was attained, and what is done by wrong conduct.  Final ruin of yoga = the person without lineage — within whose body there is no dharma able to tend toward nirvāṇa, so that the supramundane yoga is finally lost-and-ruined.  Temporary ruin of yoga = the person with lineage — within whose body there is a dharma able to tend toward nirvāṇa; though the outer conditions be lacking and a long time pass by, in the end the conditions will surely converge, and he will cultivate yoga and make it manifest, and having cultivated it well he shall attain final nirvāṇa — therefore it is said that his yoga is temporarily lost-and-ruined.  Ruin of yoga through the loss of what was attained = losing the knowledge, the vision, and the pleasant dwelling one had attained, touched, and realized.  Ruin of yoga done by wrong conduct = practicing with diligent effort not in accord with right principle, so that though much effort is expended nothing is accomplished: one cannot accomplish any yoga at all, and this is not a wholesome dharma. There is also a certain sort of person: one with many afflictions, of a nature much sullied, yet whose cognition is keen and whose awareness-wisdom is fierce, who possesses inborn awareness and well gathers what he has heard, and who brings his hearing to completion whether it is little or much. He may dwell in a secluded place, where upright householders and renunciants come to him; he teaches them the Dharma and makes their minds glad. He also practices deceit, falsely displaying various tamed-and-good bodily and verbal deeds. Thereby he amasses gain, reverence, and praise, is thought to possess great merit, and obtains various robes, food, bedding, medicines for illness, and bodily requisites. Kings, great ministers, householders, wealthy elders, and merchant-chiefs revere and honor him, all declaring him to be an arhat. Cherishing an intimate affection for the lay and monastic disciples who follow and revolve around him, and wishing to draw in more, he thinks: "These lay and monastic disciples trust and follow me, and all declare me to be an arhat. If they come to question me about yoga-attention, tranquillity, insight, and the like, and, on receiving their question, I cannot answer, they will abandon their faithful inclination toward me and no longer declare me to be an arhat; thereby I shall lose gain and reverence. I should now reflect, weigh, examine, and establish a yoga for myself." Driven by this matter and attached to gain, reverence, and fame, he dwells alone in seclusion and himself carefully reflects, weighs, examines, and establishes a yoga. Yet this yoga "does not accord with the discourses, does not appear in the discipline, and contravenes the nature of dharma." Before monks who hold the three baskets well, he conceals his yoga and is unwilling to reveal it; to his lay and monastic disciples he teaches it privately and secretly, not letting it come to light. Why? He fears that those who hold the three baskets well, on hearing this yoga topic, would test it against the discourses and find that it does not accord with them, illuminate it by the discipline and find that it does not appear there, and examine it by the Dharma and find that it contravenes the nature of dharma. They would therefore not accept it, would challenge him with words of disbelief, dispute with him, and expose him. Kings, great ministers, householders, wealthy elders, and merchant-chiefs would then no longer revere and honor him, and he would no longer obtain robes, food, bedding, medicines for illness, and bodily requisites. Through the predominant force of attachment to gain and reverence, with regard to what is not the Dharma he gives rise to the perception of Dharma, the perception of concealment, and evil desire-and-pleasure, openly revealing and teaching what is not the Dharma as the Dharma. Those who tolerate and approve his view likewise give rise to the perception of Dharma regarding what is not the Dharma and are benighted and dull-witted; though they practice diligently according to his teaching, all of it should be known as wrong conduct. This is named the ruin of yoga done by wrong conduct — "a semblance of the right dharma, not the true right dharma, able to obstruct the right dharma." The yoga practitioner who diligently cultivates the meditative absorptions should rightly and thoroughly know these four kinds of ruin of yoga, and should keep far off from them.

Seven · Yoga (the Four Yogas: Trust, Desire, Vigor, Means)

What is yoga? Yoga is of four kinds. What are the four? First, trust; second, desire; third, vigor; fourth, means.

Trust has two modes and two bases. The two modes are confidence and compliance, and purity. The two bases are examination of the principles of dharmas and confident understanding of a person's spiritual power.

Desire is of four kinds. What are the four? First, desire to attain; second, desire to inquire; third, desire to gather provisions; fourth, desire to accord with yoga. Desire to attain is longing for higher liberation, as explained above. Desire to inquire is this: after longing has arisen, one goes to a monastery and approaches a knowledgeable fellow practitioner who has achieved subtle wisdom in yoga, in order to hear what one has not heard and to bring one's hearing to completion. Desire to gather provisions is the longing to advance in purifying disciplinary restraint and restraint of the faculties, knowing moderation in food, reducing sleep, and dwelling with clear comprehension. Desire to accord with yoga is the longing, delight, and wish to act that arise on the path cultivated through uninterrupted and earnest application.

Vigor is of four kinds. What are the four? First, vigor for hearing; second, vigor for reflection; third, vigor for cultivation; fourth, vigor for purifying obstacles. Vigor for hearing is the diligent, courageous, and decisive application made to hear what has not been heard and to bring what has been heard to completion. Vigor for reflection is to dwell alone in seclusion and reflect on, weigh, and examine the meaning of the Dharma as heard. Vigor for cultivation is to enter quietude and diligently cultivate tranquillity and insight from time to time. Vigor for purifying obstacles is to rouse oneself day and night in walking and seated meditation, cleansing the mind of obstructive dharmas through diligent, courageous, decisive effort.

Means has four successive aspects: through the strengthening power of disciplinary restraint, one guards mindfulness well; through guarding mindfulness well, one becomes heedful, protects the mind, and cultivates wholesome dharmas; through heedfulness, the mind correctly cultivates inward tranquillity and insight into the higher-wisdom Dharma. These form the four aspects of means.

The four classes of yoga contain sixteen kinds in all. First, through trust one develops deep confident understanding of the aim to be attained. Once confident in that aim, one develops eager desire for wholesome dharmas. Through eager desire, one rouses oneself day and night and abides diligent, firm, and courageous. Once vigor has arisen, one embraces the means and can attain what was not attained, touch what was not touched, and realize what was not realized. Therefore these four dharmas are named yoga.

Eight · Attention (the Four Attentions · the Further Four · the Four Aspects · the Nine Resolute Convictions · the Four Tasks · the Three Yoga Practitioners)

What is attention? There are four attentions: attention that operates by forceful exertion, attention that operates with intervals, attention that operates without intervals, and attention that operates effortlessly.  Attention that operates by forceful exertion = the beginner, causing his mind inwardly to abide-in-equipoise and to settle-in-equipoise, or unmistakenly discerning the dharmas, on up to the point where he has not yet attained the attention he is cultivating: at that time, redoubling his strength, he curbs-and-checks his mind and makes it dwell on a single object.  Attention that operates with intervals = after he has attained the attention he is cultivating, the apprehending-the-aspect attention that gradually advances along the mundane and supramundane path, which — being intermixed by the "reflection" of meditative absorption — is not yet able to cultivate single-mindedly and purely.  Attention that operates without intervals = from the apprehending-the-aspect attention onward, up to the culmination-of-effort attention.  Attention that operates effortlessly = the fruit-of-the-culmination-of-effort attention.

There are also the further four kinds of attention: the accordant attention (giving rise to deep disenchantment-and-abhorrence toward the object, rousing right application, but not yet having severed the afflictions); the counteracting attention (able to sever the afflictions); the attention conducive to purity (when the mind is downcast, taking up a pure-and-sublime mark and rousing it to gladness-and-joy); the attention conducive to contemplation (contemplating whether the afflictions are severed or not yet severed).

Question: When one rightly attends to the object, how many aspects does one reflect upon? Answer: Four aspects — the object-aspect (the image, of the same class as the thing to be known, appearing clearly-and-distinctly); the cause-and-condition-aspect (the amassing of the provisions of meditative absorption, the accordant guidance, the fierce eager desire that co-operates with cultivation, the deep disenchantment-and-abhorrence toward what is to be loathed, the ability thoroughly to know whether one is disturbed or undisturbed, and the not being harassed-and-touched by others (the marks of disturbance being either what a person does, or what a non-person does, or what a sound does, or what exertion does); if insight is chief, then after inwardly shrinking his mind and contemplating with utmost fierce vigor comes the cause-and-condition-aspect; if tranquillity is chief, then after rousing excellent insight and stopping with utmost fierce vigor comes the cause-and-condition-aspect); the aspect to be kept far off (of four kinds: the mark of sinking, which makes the mind inferior-and-low; the mark of restlessness, which makes the mind lifted-up-high; the mark of clinging, which makes the mind give rise to defilement-and-clinging toward the object and stir up disturbance; and the mark of distraction, which makes the mind gallop-and-scatter outwardly and be agitated — as already stated in the Stage of Meditative Equipoise); and the aspect to be cultivated.

Question: When attention gives rise to resolute conviction toward the object, how many resolute convictions are there? Answer: Nine — the resolute conviction that is light-and-clear (with regard to the mark of light, clarifying the mind and taking it up well, so as to be together with light); the resolute conviction that is not light-and-clear (unable to take it up well, so as to be together with murk-and-darkness); the dull resolute conviction (in one of dull faculties); the quick-and-keen resolute conviction (in one of sharp faculties); the small resolute conviction (small confidence-and-desire, and a small object); the vast resolute conviction (vast confidence-and-desire, and a vast object); the measureless resolute conviction (boundless confidence-and-desire, and a boundless object); the pure resolute conviction (already well-cultivated, accomplished, and ultimate in its operation); the impure resolute conviction (not yet well-cultivated, accomplished, or ultimate in its operation).

Question: How many kinds of yoga-task does one who cultivates yoga have? Answer: Four — the cessation of the basis, the transformation of the basis, the thorough knowing of the object, and the delighting in the object. The cessation of the basis and the transformation of the basis = because one diligently cultivates the yoga-attention, the basis co-operating with coarse-and-heavy states gradually ceases, and the basis co-operating with pliancy gradually transforms. The thorough knowing of the object and the delighting in the object = either they take the cessation-and-transformation of the basis as chief (whereby the thorough-knowing-and-delighting-in the object, as dominant condition, causes the cessation-and-transformation of the basis), or they take the purity of the basis as chief (whereby the purity of the basis, as dominant condition, causes the thorough-knowing-and-delighting-in the object to attain a good purity, operating at the time when what is to be done is accomplished).

Question: How many kinds of yoga practitioner are there? Answer: Three — the beginner yoga practitioner, the yoga practitioner already in habitual practice, and the yoga practitioner who has passed beyond attention.  The beginner yoga practitioner is of two: the beginner with regard to attention (dwelling on a single object, diligently cultivating attention, but not yet having attained the attention to be cultivated, not yet having touched-and-realized one-pointedness of mind), and the beginner with regard to purifying the afflictions (one who, having already realized the attention to be cultivated, wishes to purify his mind of the afflictions and rouses, takes up, and rightly and diligently cultivates the apprehending-the-aspect attention).  The yoga practitioner already in habitual practice = having, apart from the apprehending-the-aspect attention, well cultivated the remaining attentions on up to the culmination-of-effort attention.  The yoga practitioner who has passed beyond attention = dwelling in the station of the fruit-of-the-culmination-of-effort attention, having surpassed the attention cultivated by the means-of-effort, and dwelling in the fruit of cultivation.  Again: from the arising of the eager desire to cultivate the wholesome dharmas, on up to before the wholesome roots conducive to penetration have arisen, one is named a beginner; when the wholesome roots conducive to penetration have arisen (warmth, summit, accordant-acceptance-of-the-truths, the supreme worldly dharma), one is named already in habitual practice; when one has realized-and-entered the assurance of the right course, attained the direct realization of the truths, [being] not [other-dependent] on other conditions, and not carried off by other conditions with regard to the Buddha's noble teaching, one is named having passed beyond attention (having surpassed the attention dependent on other conditions, dwelling in the attention not dependent on other conditions).

聲聞地 · 第二瑜伽處 · 瑜伽修 · 三十七菩提分The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · The Second Yoga-Station · The Cultivation of Yoga · The Thirty-Seven Factors of Awakening

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

第二瑜伽處的「修」。瑜伽修分二:想修(修各種對治想)與菩提分修(修三十七菩提分法)。這一子是聲聞修證的骨幹——四念住·四正斷·四神足·五根·五力·七覺支·八支聖道,連同聖所愛戒。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

一、想修

什麼是瑜伽修?有二種:想修、菩提分修。

什麼是想修?修世間道時,對一切下地修習過患想;修趣向涅槃的道時,在斷界、離欲界、滅界中觀見最殊勝、最寂靜的功德,修習斷想、離欲想、滅想;修奢摩他(止)時,修習止品的上下想;修毗鉢舍那(觀)時,修習觀品的前後想。

什麼是上下想?就是觀察這個身體,如它現在安住的樣子,也如自己所願觀察的方式:從頭頂以上開始,向下直到腳底,身中充滿種種混雜的不淨物,也就是這身體中所有的髮、毛、爪、齒等,如前面已經廣說。這就名為上下想。

什麼是前後想?就是有人對所觀之相殷勤懇切,善能取得、善能思惟、善能了知、善能通達。他站立時觀察將要坐下,坐著時觀察將要躺臥,或處在後一作意時觀察前一作意。這顯示以毗鉢舍那行觀察過去、現在、未來三世緣生的諸行。

所謂「站立時觀察將要坐下」,顯示以現在作意觀察未來所知諸行。為什麼?現在作意位已經現在生起,所以譬喻為「住」;未來所知位還沒有現在生起,但即將生起,所以譬喻為「坐」。

所謂「坐著時觀察將要躺臥」,顯示以現在作意觀察過去所知諸行。為什麼?現在作意位即將滅去,所以譬喻為「坐」;過去所知位已經謝滅,所以譬喻為「臥」。

所謂「處在後行觀察前行」,顯示以現在作意觀察無間剛滅的現行作意。為什麼?已經生起而無間謝滅的所取作意,名為前行;在它之後無間新新生起、能取前一已滅作意的作意,名為後行。

應知,為了修習止與觀,行者修習這止觀二品的殊勝光明想,這就名為想修。

二、菩提分修——三十七菩提分

什麼是菩提分修?就是對三十七種菩提分法親近、積集,加以修習、反覆修習、多加修習。這就名為菩提分修。哪三十七種法名為菩提分法?就是四念住、四正斷、四神足、五根、五力、七覺支、八支聖道。

 四念住是:一、身念住,二、受念住,三、心念住,四、法念住。

 四正斷是:一、對已生的惡不善法,為使它斷除而生欲、策勵、發勤精進、策心、持心,作正確的斷除;二、對未生的惡不善法,為使它不生而生欲、策勵、發勤精進、策心、持心,作正確的斷除;三、對未生的善法,為使它生起而生欲、策勵、發勤精進、策心、持心,作正確的修習;四、對已生的善法,為使它安住、不忘失、修習圓滿、加倍修習、增長、廣大,而生欲、策勵、發勤精進、策心、持心,作正確的防護與增長。

 四神足是:一、欲三摩地斷行成就神足,二、勤三摩地斷行成就神足,三、心三摩地斷行成就神足,四、觀三摩地斷行成就神足。

 五根是:一、信根,二、精進根,三、念根,四、定根,五、慧根。五力是:一、信力,二、精進力,三、念力,四、定力,五、慧力。

 七覺支是:一、念等覺支,二、擇法等覺支,三、精進等覺支,四、喜等覺支,五、安等覺支,六、定等覺支,七、捨等覺支。

 八支聖道是:一、正見,二、正思惟,三、正語,四、正業,五、正命,六、正精進,七、正念,八、正定。

(甲)四念住

身念住。先問:什麼是身?什麼是「於身住循身觀」?什麼是念?什麼是念住?  身相略有三十五種:內身、外身、根所攝身、非根所攝身、有情數身、非有情數身、麁重俱行身、輕安俱行身、能造身、所造身、名身、色身、那落迦身、傍生身、祖父國身、人身、天身、有識身、無識身、中身、表身、變異身、不變異身、女身、男身、半擇迦身、親友身、非親友身、中庸身、劣身、中身、妙身、幼身、少身、老身——這是身相差別。  什麼是於身住循身觀?略有三種,也就是依身而生的聞所成慧、思所成慧、修所成慧。由這三種慧,行者對一切身、一切身相正確觀察、正確推求,隨順觀察而隨順覺知。這就名為於身住循身觀。

 什麼是?就是依身為增上,受持正法、思惟法義、修習並親自作證;在對經文與法義的修習作證之中,心不忘失。這就名為念。

 什麼是念住?行者仔細思惟:「我對正法是真正受持,還是沒有真正受持?我對每一項法義都以智慧善加了達,還是沒有了達?我對每一種解脫都善能親自觸證,還是沒有觸證?」如此審慎、如實地使念安住,便名為念住。

 又念住之名有三重理由:為了守護念,為了對境不生染著,為了使念安住所緣。為了守護念,如經所說「先守護念」或「恒常委念」。為了對境無染,如經所說以念守護其心,行於平等位,不取境界總相,也不取細微隨好;乃至守護意根,修習意根律儀。為了安住所緣,如經所說,對四種所緣安住其念,也就是遍滿所緣、淨行所緣、善巧所緣、淨惑所緣。由這三種相善加安住其念,所以名為念住。

受念住。什麼是受?先有樂受、苦受、不苦不樂受三種。三者各有身受與心受:樂身受、苦身受、不苦不樂身受,以及樂心受、苦心受、不苦不樂心受。三者又各有四類:樂、苦、不苦不樂的有愛味受;樂、苦、不苦不樂的無愛味受;樂、苦、不苦不樂的依耽嗜受;樂、苦、不苦不樂的依出離受。如此總有二十一受;另可約說為九種受。逐項說:樂受是以順樂受觸為緣所生、受所攝的「平等受」;苦受是以順苦受觸為緣所生、受所攝的「不平等受」;不苦不樂受是以順不苦不樂受觸為緣所生、受所攝的「非平等非不平等受」。這三受若與前五識相應,名為身受;若與意識相應,名為心受。若這些受隨順涅槃、隨順決擇,能畢竟出離、畢竟離垢、畢竟令梵行圓滿,名無愛味受;若墮在三界之中,名有愛味受;若繫屬色界、無色界,或隨順離欲,名依出離受;若繫屬欲界,或不隨順離欲,名依耽嗜受。

心念住。什麼是心?共有二十種:有貪心、離貪心、有瞋心、離瞋心、有癡心、離癡心、略心、散心、下心、舉心、掉心、不掉心、寂靜心、不寂靜心、定心、不定心、善修心、不善修心、善解脫心、不善解脫心。

 什麼是有貪心?就是對可愛的所緣境事,被貪纏纏縛的心。什麼是離貪心?就是遠離這種貪纏的心。什麼是有瞋心?就是對可憎的所緣境事,被瞋纏纏縛的心。什麼是離瞋心?就是遠離這種瞋纏的心。什麼是有癡心?就是對容易生起愚癡的所緣境事,被癡纏纏縛的心。什麼是離癡心?就是遠離這種癡纏的心。這六種心,都是行動時所生起的貪、瞋、癡三種煩惱品,以及三種對治品的差別。

 什麼是略心?就是由正確修行,把心繫縛在內在所緣上。什麼是散心?就是心隨順外在五種妙欲而流散。什麼是下心?就是與惛沈睡眠共同運行的心。什麼是舉心?就是淨妙所緣在心中明白顯現。什麼是掉心?就是心舉得過高,被掉舉纏擾動。什麼是不掉心?就是無論心舉起或收略,都能得到平等的捨。什麼是寂靜心?就是已從各種蓋障中得到解脫。什麼是不寂靜心?就是還沒有從各種蓋障中得到解脫。

 什麼是定心?就是從諸蓋得到解脫以後,又能證入根本靜慮。什麼是不定心?就是還不能證入根本靜慮。什麼是善修心?就是對這種定長時串習,能隨自己所欲,沒有艱難、沒有阻澀,迅速證入。什麼是不善修心?它的情形與善修心相反。什麼是善解脫心?就是從一切煩惱中得到究竟解脫。什麼是不善解脫心?就是沒有從一切煩惱中得到究竟解脫。

 以上後十四種心,都是安住時所生起的。依淨除蓋障的階段,安住時生起八種心,也就是從略心、散心一直到寂靜心、不寂靜心;依淨除煩惱的階段,安住時生起六種心,也就是定心、不定心一直到善解脫心、不善解脫心。

 又,內心有蓋時,能自己如實了知「我有諸蓋」;內心無蓋時,能自己如實了知「我無諸蓋」。那些蓋原先未生而後生起,也能了知;生起以後散壞滅去,也能了知。眼根上有結乃至意根上有結,能自己了知「我有眼結」乃至「我有意結」;眼根上無結乃至意根上無結,也能自己了知。那些眼結乃至意結原先未生而後生起,以及生起以後散壞滅去,都能如實了知。

法念住。什麼是法?就是貪與調伏貪的法、瞋與調伏瞋的法、癡與調伏癡的法;又有略法與散法、下法與舉法、掉法與不掉法、寂靜法與不寂靜法、定法與不定法、善修法與不善修法、善解脫法與不善解脫法。依這些相對差別,建立黑品、白品,染品、淨品二十種法。

 又,內心有念等覺支時,能自己如實了知「我有念等覺支」;內心沒有念等覺支時,能自己如實了知「我無念等覺支」。念等覺支原先未生而後生起,能如實了知;生起以後安住、不忘失、修習圓滿、加倍修習、增長廣大,也都能如實了知。對念等覺支如此,對擇法、精進、喜、安、定、捨等覺支,也都應作同樣理解。

 若能如此如實遍知各種雜染法的自性、因緣、過患與對治,便是法念住的體。

如說身念住的念與念住,受、心、法念住隨其所應也一樣。

四念住對治四顛倒。第一,為了對治在不淨中顛倒計為清淨,建立身念住。佛世尊在循身念住中,宣說與不淨相應的四種憺怕路;若能對此多加思惟,便能在不淨法中斷除計淨的顛倒。第二,為了對治在苦中顛倒計為樂,建立受念住。行者對各種受住循受觀,如實了知所有受全都是苦,便能在諸苦中斷除計樂的顛倒。第三,為了對治在無常中顛倒計為常,建立心念住。行者了知有貪心等種種差別的心,經歷一日一夜又一日一夜,在每一剎那、每一瞬息、每一須臾之間,以非一、眾多、種種品類生起又滅去,便能在無常中斷除計常的顛倒。第四,為了對治在無我中顛倒計為我,建立法念住。行者先前因有我見等煩惱、沒有無我見等善法,所以在五蘊中生起我見;現在對各種法住循法觀,如實了知所計五蘊各自的自相與共同的共相,便能在無我中斷除計我的顛倒。

 又有另一重差別。世間人大多不能如實了知,諸蘊只是蘊、諸法只是法,卻橫生計度,以為有一個我依止在身上;由於依身,所以有我受用苦樂;受苦受樂的我,又因法與非法而有染、有淨。為了除遣對「我所依之事」的愚癡,建立身念住;為了除遣對「我所領受之事」的愚癡,建立受念住;為了除遣把心、意、識執為我的愚癡,也就是對所執之我的愚癡,建立心念住;為了除遣對「所執的我心能成染、能成淨之事」的愚癡,建立法念住。

 又有另一重差別:依什麼而造作各種業,為了什麼而造業,是誰在造業,由什麼法而造業。為了總體顯示這一切,建立四念住。這裡應知:依止身而造作諸業,為了求受而造作諸業,心能造業,由善法、不善法而能造作諸業。

 又有另一重差別:依什麼而有染有淨,為了什麼而起染起淨,是誰染淨,由什麼法而成染成淨。為了總體顯示這一切,建立四念住。這裡應知:依止身而有染有淨,為了求受而起染起淨,心是染淨者,由各種法而成染成淨。

問:「念住」是什麼意思?答:在這一法上安住其念,或由這一法而使念安住,兩者都名為念住。「在這一法上安住其念」,是指作為所緣的念住。「由這一法而使念安住」,是指慧或念攝持於定,這是自性念住;其餘與它相應的各種心與心法,是相雜念住。又由身、受、心、法增上所生的善有漏道與無漏道,也都名為念住。這些道又分三種:一、聞所成,二、思所成,三、修所成。聞所成與思所成只有有漏;修所成則通於有漏與無漏。

〔本地分中聲聞地第十三第二瑜伽處之四〕

內外身等六重差別的逐項對應

內、外、內外的差別,共有六重:

 第一,緣自己內在、屬於有情數的身色為境,名於內身住循身觀;緣外界非有情數的色,名於外身;緣外在他有情的身色,名於內外身。若緣依這三種色所生的受、心、法,隨自身、外非有情數色、他有情身色而別,就名於內、於外、於內外受心法住循三觀。

 第二,緣根所攝、有執受的色,名於內身;緣非根所攝、無執受的色,名於外身;緣非根所攝而有執受的色,名於內外身。若緣依前三色所生的受、心、法,隨其所應,就是住循三觀。

 第三,緣自內定地輕安俱行的色,名於內身;緣自內不定地麤重俱行的色,名於外身;緣他人輕安俱行、麤重俱行的色,名於內外身。若緣依前三色所生的受、心、法,隨其所應,就是住循三觀。

 第四,緣內在能造大種色,名於內身;緣外在能造大種色,名於外身;緣依能造大種所生、根與境所攝的所造色,名於內外身。若緣依前三色所生的受、心、法,隨其所應,就是住循三觀。

 第五,緣有識身的內色,名於內身;緣無識身中屬有情數、已至青瘀等位的色,名於外身;緣無識身的色在過去曾是有識性,又緣有識身的色在未來將成無識性,以它們相似的法性、平等的法性為境,名於內外身。若緣依前三色所生的受、心、法,隨其所應,就是住循三觀。

 第六,緣自己內在中身的髮、毛、爪、齒等相,名於內身;緣他人中身的髮、毛、爪、齒等相,名於外身;緣內表身變異或不變異的青瘀等相,又緣外表身變異或不變異的青瘀等相,以它們相似的法性、平等的法性為境,名於內外身。若緣依前三色所生的受、心、法,隨其所應,就是住循三觀。如此身、受、心、法的差別門有多種,這裡只顯示其中少分。

(乙)四正斷

如此串習四念住以後,行者已能除遣最粗重的顛倒,也已能了達善法與不善法。緊接著,他對未生的惡不善法,為了使它不生;對已生的惡不善法,為了使它斷除;對未生的一切善法,為了使它生起;對已生的一切善法,為了使它安住、不忘失、修習圓滿,乃至策心、持心而修四正斷。

什麼叫作惡不善法?就是被欲纏染污的身業、語業、意業,屬於身、語、意三種惡行,以及能引起這些惡行的一切煩惱。這些法若還未和合、還未現在現前,就說是「未生」;若已經和合、已經現在現前,就說是「已生」。什麼叫作一切善法?就是惡不善法的對治、五蓋的對治、諸結的對治。它們的未生與已生,也應如前面對惡不善法的說明而理解。

什麼是對未生惡不善法為不生故而生欲?惡不善法原先尚未和合,行者為了使它不生,發起希願:「我應當使這一切惡不善法全都不再生起。」這就名為對未生惡不善法,為不生故而生欲。什麼是對已生惡不善法為令斷故而生欲?惡不善法原先已經和合,行者為了使它斷除,發起希願:「我對這一切惡不善法全都不肯忍受,應當斷滅、除遣。」這就名為對已生惡不善法,為令斷故而生欲。

所有惡不善法,有的緣過去事而生,有的緣未來事而生,有的緣現在事而生。因此,它們有的緣不現見境,有的緣現見境。緣過去、未來事境的,名為緣不現見境;緣現在事境的,名為緣現見境。

對於緣不現見境的惡不善法,未生的想使它不生,已生的想使它永斷,自己策發、自己勉勵,這名為策勵。對於緣現見境的惡不善法,未生的想使它不生,已生的想使它永斷,勇猛正勤,這名為發勤精進。為什麼?因為必須堅固地自策自勵、勇猛正勤,才能使那些法不再生起,或使已生者永遠斷滅。

又對下品、中品的煩惱纏,未生的想使它不生,已生的想使它永斷,因此自我策勵;對上品煩惱纏,未生的想使它不生,已生的想使它永斷,因此發勤精進。行於過去境界時,不使煩惱緣那境界而生;即使失念而暫時生起,也不肯忍受,迅速斷滅、除遣、排除。行於未來境界也同樣如此。這樣使未生惡法不生、已生惡法斷除,名為策勵。行於現在所緣境界時,同樣不使煩惱生起;即使暫時生起,也不肯忍受,迅速斷滅、除遣、排除。這樣使未生惡法不生、已生惡法斷除,名為發勤精進。

惡不善法又有兩種:有的只由分別力生,不由境界力生;有的既由分別力生,也由境界力生。只由分別力生而不由境界力生,是在安住時思惟過去、未來境界而生起。既由分別力也由境界力生,是在行動時緣現在境界而生起;這時必定也有不如理分別。只由分別力生的惡不善法,未生能令不生、已生能令斷,名為策勵;由分別力與境界力共同生的惡不善法,未生能令不生、已生能令斷,名為發勤精進。

什麼是對未生一切善法為令生故而生欲?就是對尚未得到、尚未現在現前的善法,為了得到它、使它現在現前,發心希願,發起猛利的求得欲、求現前欲,使這些願欲現在現前。什麼是對已生一切善法為令住、不忘失、修圓滿而生欲?已經得到、已經現在現前的善法,名為已生善法。對善法已得不失、已得不退,所以說「為欲令住」;善法明了現前,沒有闇鈍,所以說「令不忘失」;善法已經現前,又一再修習而達到成滿究竟,所以說「令修圓滿」。行者對這些善法發心希願,發起猛利的求堅住欲、求不忘欲、求修滿欲,使這些願欲現在現前,這就名為對已生一切善法,為令住、不忘失、修圓滿而生欲。

策勵,是要使已經得到的善法現在現前;發勤精進,是要使尚未得到的善法得到。策勵,也是要使已生善法安住、不忘失;發勤精進,則是要使善法修習圓滿。對下品、中品善法,未生令生,已生令住、不忘失,名為策勵;對上品善法,未生令生,已生乃至令它修習圓滿,名為發勤精進。

什麼是策心?心在修奢摩他一境性中正勤用功,從使未生惡法不生,一直到使已生善法安住、不忘失、修習圓滿;由這樣用功,心可能過度向內收略而變得下劣,或有變得下劣的危險。觀見這情形以後,行者便取一種淨妙的舉相,殷勤策勵,使心慶悅。這就名為策心。

什麼是持心?修習舉相時,心可能掉動,或有掉動的危險。觀見這情形以後,行者便重新向內收攝其心,修習奢摩他。這就名為持心。

這四種也名為四正勝。對黑品法,未生者令它不生,已生者令它斷滅,為此生欲、策勵、發勤精進、策心、持心,這是兩種正勝;對白品法,未生者令它生起,已生者令它安住圓滿,同樣生欲乃至持心,這是另外兩種正勝。

這四種也名為四正斷。第一名律儀斷:對已生惡不善法,為使它斷除而生欲、策勵乃至持心;因為對已生惡事應修律儀,使它斷滅而不應忍受,所以名律儀斷。第二名斷斷:對未生惡不善法,為使它不生而生欲、策勵乃至持心;為使它斷於不現行、斷於不現前,是為斷而斷,所以名斷斷。第三名修斷:對未生一切善法,為使它生起而生欲乃至策心、持心;因為一再修習善法,能使先前未得者現在現前,並能有所斷,所以名修斷。第四名防護斷:對已生一切善法,為使它安住而生欲乃至策心、持心;因為對已得、已現前的善法遠離放逸、修不放逸,能使善法安住不忘、修習圓滿,防護一切已生善法並能有所斷,所以名防護斷。

四正斷的簡要意義是:在黑品、白品應捨應取的事中,顯示增上意樂圓滿與加行圓滿。由於生起願欲,增上意樂圓滿;由於自策自勵、發勤精進、策心、持心,加行圓滿。修瑜伽師應作的事只有這些:為斷所應斷、得所應得,先發希願樂欲;為斷各種煩惱纏,時時正勤修習止相、舉相、捨相;為斷煩惱纏及隨眠,更修習能對治它們的善法。為了顯示這一切所作,宣說四正勝與四正斷。這就是它們的略義。

(丙)四神足

從此以後,行者再修四種三摩地:欲三摩地、勤三摩地、心三摩地、觀三摩地。應知,由欲的增上力所得三摩地,名欲三摩地;由勤的增上力所得三摩地,名勤三摩地;由心的增上力所得三摩地,名心三摩地;由觀察的增上力所得三摩地,名觀三摩地。

 什麼是欲增上力所得三摩地?行者純粹生起樂欲以後,對一切惡不善法的自性、因緣、過患、對治,正確而審慎地思察,生起安住一境的念;對一切善法的自性、因緣、功德、出離,也正確而審慎地思察,安住一境的念。由如此多加修習,便觸證心一境性,能使一切正在現行的惡不善法煩惱纏遠離,但還沒有永遠損害煩惱隨眠。這就名為欲增上力所得三摩地。

 什麼是勤增上力所得三摩地?對過去、未來、現在所緣境界中一切能隨順惡不善法、能隨順下中上品煩惱纏的法,未生者令它不生,已生者令它斷滅;為此自策、自勵、發勤精進。在行於那些所緣時,又對那些境界的自性、因緣、過患、對治正確而審慎地思察,安住一境的念。由如此多加安住,便能正確生起心一境性,使一切現行煩惱纏遠離,但還沒有永遠損害煩惱隨眠。這就名為勤增上力所得三摩地。

 什麼是心增上力所得三摩地?行者策發一切下劣的心,制持一切掉舉的心,又時時修習增上的捨;由這些因緣,對能隨順惡不善法者,以及能隨順善法者的自性、因緣、過患、功德、對治、出離,正確而審慎地思察,安住一境的念。由如此多加安住,便能正確生起心一境性。這就名為心增上力所得三摩地。

 什麼是觀增上力所得三摩地?行者把能隨順惡不善法的作意思惟觀為不如理,把能隨順一切善法的作意思惟觀為如理。由於遠離煩惱纏,又能生起以定為上首的種種對治善法,便使一切惡不善法都不現行。這時他自己思惟:「我現在是否仍有現成存在的惡不善法而自己沒有覺知?或者確實沒有現成存在的惡不善法而自己沒有覺知?我應當周遍審慎觀察。」他由觀察作意的增上力,親自正確觀察煩惱已斷或未斷,正審思察,安住一境的念;由多加安住,便正確觸證心一境性。由此遠離增上慢,如實自知:「我只對煩惱纏心得解脫,還沒有對一切煩惱隨眠心得解脫;我只獲得並修習了對治煩惱纏、以定為上首的善法,還沒有獲得並修習對治隨眠的善法。」這就名為觀增上力所得三摩地。  彼由四三摩地遠諸纏後,為永害一切隨眠、修集對治善法,更生樂欲策勵(如前四正斷加行);正修時有八斷行為永害隨眠、為三摩地圓滿而轉。哪八種?一欲(希望「我何時修三摩地當圓滿?何時斷隨眠?」)、二策勵(乃至修對治不捨加行)、三信(不捨加行安住故於上所證深生信解)、四安(清淨信為首心生歡喜、漸息惡不善品麁重)、五念(九種相、於九相安住其心、止品攝持)、六正知(觀品慧)、七思(心造作、於斷未斷正觀時造作其心、發起順止觀的身語業)、八捨(於三世隨順惡不善法中心無染污、心平等性;由境界不現見思及現見捨,於隨眠斷分別了知)。這八斷行也名勝行。  這八斷行即「為害隨眠的瑜伽」:欲=彼欲、策勵=彼精進、信=彼信、安念正知思捨=彼方便。若先欲等四三摩地、若今八斷行,於永斷隨眠、圓滿成辦三摩地時,總名「欲/勤/心/觀三摩地斷行成就神足」。  問:何故名「神足」?答:如有足者能往能還、騰躍勇健,能得能證世間殊勝法(殊勝法名「神」,能到此故名「足」);同樣,三摩地圓滿成辦者,心清淨鮮白、離隨煩惱、安住正直、有所堪能、獲得不動,能往能還騰躍勇健,能得能證出世間法(出世法最勝自在是最勝「神」,能證此故名「足」)。

(丁)五根·五力

彼以勝三摩地為所依,能進修增上心學、增上慧學的瑜伽;由此於大師、弟子所證深生勝解淨信——這清淨信「增上」故名信根(問:於何增上?答:於能生出世間法為上首,及於能起精進念定慧為增上;精進等亦於生出世法及展轉乃至慧為增上;慧唯於生出世法為增上——故信等名五根)。  若了知前後所證有差別、隨之於後後所證出世法深生勝解淨信——這清淨信「難伏」故名信力。問:誰不能伏?答:這清淨信,天、魔、沙門、婆羅門、餘世間都無有如法能引奪者,諸煩惱纏也不能屈,故名難伏;此為上首前行,餘精進等亦名為力——這些力具大威勢,能摧伏一切魔軍勢力、證一切諸漏永盡,故名力。  當觀此中:信根信力=四證淨中的淨信(證入正性離生的證淨皆由此因緣,是其增上果,依因果相屬說「即彼證淨」而非即彼體相);精進根力=四正斷中的精進(能永斷見道所斷一切煩惱的方便正斷);念根念力=四念住中的正念(能無餘斷一切顛倒);定根定力=四靜慮中的正定(為方便證不還果);慧根慧力=四聖諦中的正智(於四諦證現觀得沙門果)。  由這諸根諸力漸修漸習漸多修習,便能發起下中上品的順決擇分四善根:煗、頂、順諦忍、世第一法。鑽火喻:如人鑽火,下安乾木、上施鑽燧,精勤策勵勇猛鑽求——下木上最初生煗(喻「煗」善根,是燒煩惱無漏法火的前相)、煗增長熱氣上衝(喻「頂」)、次煙發(喻「順諦忍」)、無焰火欻然流出(喻「世第一法」)、火無間發生猛焰(喻世第一法所攝五根五力無間所生的出世無漏聖法);火既出便能作火所作。

(戊)七覺支

這出世無漏聖法是什麼?就是七覺支——已證入正性離生的補特伽羅,其如實覺慧用此七為支,故名覺支。七覺支三品所攝:擇法、精進、喜=觀(毗鉢舍那)品;安、定、捨=止(奢摩他)品;念一種俱品所攝,名遍行。彼此時最初獲得七覺支,名「初有學見聖諦迹」,已永斷見道所斷一切煩惱,唯餘修道所斷煩惱。

(己)八支聖道·聖所愛戒

為斷修道所斷煩惱,修「三蘊所攝的八支聖道」:正見、正思惟、正精進=慧蘊;正語、正業、正命=戒蘊;正念、正定=定蘊。  問:何故名八支聖道?答:諸聖有學已見迹者,由八支所攝的行迹正道,能無餘斷一切煩惱、於解脫究竟作證,故名八支聖道。  正見=覺支時所得真覺,及得後以慧如證而覺,二者合名正見。正思惟=由正見增上所起的出離、無恚、無害分別思惟;若心趣入各種所尋思,就只尋思具有這些相狀的尋思。正語=由正見增上起善思惟、發起種種如法言論。正業=如法求衣服飲食坐臥具醫藥什物時,往還、覩瞻、屈伸、持衣鉢僧伽胝、食飲噉甞正知而住;住時於已求衣服等事行住坐臥乃至解勞睡正知而住。正命=如法追求衣服飲食乃至什物、遠離一切邪命法。  遠離所攝的正語、業、命,於證得無漏作意諸覺支時先已獲得。問:何故名聖所愛戒?答:諸聖賢善正至者長夜愛樂欣慕悅意「我何時當正獲得『不作諸語惡行、身惡行、邪命事』的律儀」,由長夜於此尸羅深心愛樂欣慕,故獲得時名「聖所愛」。獲得聖愛戒已,終不正知而說妄語、終不故思害命、終不故思不與取、終不故思行欲邪行、終不非法求衣服等。由聖所愛戒增上力,於修道時所有語業身業養命事轉,也得名正語、業、命。  依正見及正思惟、正語、業、命勤修者,所有欲勤精進、出離勇猛、勢力發起策勵其心、相續無間,名正精進。成就正精進者,由四念住增上力得無顛倒的九種行相所攝正念、能攝九種行相心住——這是正念及正定。  八支聖道總立二種:無所作(正語、正業、正命)與住所作(止與觀:正見、正思惟、正精進=觀;正念、正定=止)。以清淨正語業命為所依,時時修止觀能斷諸結〔「能斷」底本作「斷」、宋·元·明·聖四本作「證」(能證諸結)——底本從大正「斷」讀,四本「證」異讀並錄(0445b22)〕、無餘永斷得最上阿羅漢果。長時相續名修道(多時串習斷煩惱)、暫時智起即能永斷名見道——正語業命於修道中方始建立。

由如此漸次修習三十七種菩提分法的加行方便,名菩提分修。

The "cultivation" of the second yoga-station. The cultivation of yoga is of two kinds: the cultivation of concepts (cultivating the various counteracting concepts) and the cultivation of the factors of awakening (cultivating the thirty-seven factors of awakening). This subsection is the backbone of the śrāvaka's practice and realization — the four foundations of mindfulness · the four right exertions · the four bases of psychic power · the five faculties · the five powers · the seven awakening-factors · the eightfold noble path, together with the discipline beloved of the noble ones. The technical terms are kept as of old, each phrase rendered into today's language; no doctrinal exposition is added, no treatise is cited, no Sanskrit is annotated; where the treatise-text is condensed, the fuller sense is restored within 〔brackets〕.

I. The Cultivation of Concepts

What is the cultivation of yoga? There are two kinds: the cultivation of concepts, and the cultivation of the factors of awakening.

What is the cultivation of concepts? When cultivating the mundane path, one cultivates the perception of peril regarding all lower grounds. When cultivating the path to nirvāṇa, one sees the supremely peaceful qualities of the element of severance, the element of dispassion, and the element of cessation, and cultivates perceptions of severance, dispassion, and cessation. When cultivating tranquillity, one cultivates the upward-and-downward perception belonging to the tranquillity class. When cultivating insight, one cultivates the before-and-after perception belonging to the insight class.

What is the upward-and-downward perception? One observes this body as it stands and in the manner one resolves to contemplate it: from above the crown of the head down to the soles of the feet, it is filled with many mixed kinds of impurity—the hair of the head, body hair, nails, teeth, and all the other substances explained above. This is named the upward-and-downward perception.

What is the before-and-after perception? With diligent earnestness, one takes up, reflects on, comprehends, and penetrates the contemplated sign. Standing, one observes sitting; sitting, one observes lying down; or, in the later activity, one observes the earlier activity. This displays how insight observes dependently arisen formations in the past, present, and future.

"Standing, one observes sitting" means that present attention observes future formations. Why? The present phase of attention has already arisen and is therefore called "standing." The future phase to be known has not yet arisen but is about to arise and is therefore called "sitting."

"Sitting, one observes lying down" means that present attention observes past formations. Why? The present phase of attention is about to cease and is therefore called "sitting." The past phase to be known has already passed away and is therefore called "lying down."

"In the later activity, one observes the earlier activity" means that present attention observes the immediately preceding attention that has just ceased. Why? The grasped attention that arose and immediately passed away is called the earlier activity. The newly arising grasping attention that takes the immediately preceding, now-ceased attention as its object is called the later activity.

Thus, for the cultivation of tranquillity and insight, one cultivates the surpassing perception of luminosity belonging to these two classes. This is named the cultivation of concepts.

II. The Cultivation of the Factors of Awakening — the Thirty-Seven Factors of Awakening

What is the cultivation of the factors of awakening? It is to draw near to and accumulate the thirty-seven factors of awakening, cultivating them, repeatedly practicing them, and cultivating them abundantly. This is named the cultivation of the factors of awakening. What are the thirty-seven factors? They are the four foundations of mindfulness, four right exertions, four bases of spiritual power, five faculties, five powers, seven awakening factors, and eightfold noble path.

 The four foundations of mindfulness are: first, mindfulness of the body; second, mindfulness of feeling; third, mindfulness of mind; fourth, mindfulness of dharmas.

 The four right exertions are: first, regarding already-arisen evil and unwholesome dharmas, to generate zeal, spur oneself on, exert diligent effort, brace the mind, and hold the mind so as to sever them; second, regarding not-yet-arisen evil and unwholesome dharmas, to apply the same effort so that they do not arise; third, regarding not-yet-arisen wholesome dharmas, to apply it so that they arise; fourth, regarding already-arisen wholesome dharmas, to apply it so that they abide, are not forgotten, are cultivated to completion, are repeatedly cultivated, increase, and become vast.

 The four bases of spiritual power are: first, the base of spiritual power accomplished by the concentration of aspiration and exertions of severance; second, that accomplished by the concentration of effort; third, that accomplished by the concentration of mind; fourth, that accomplished by the concentration of investigation.

 The five faculties are faith, effort, mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom. The five powers are the powers of faith, effort, mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom.

 The seven awakening factors are mindfulness, investigation of dharmas, effort, joy, tranquillity, concentration, and equanimity.

 The eightfold noble path is right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration.

(a) The Four Foundations of Mindfulness

The foundation of mindfulness of the body. First the question: What is the body? What is "abiding in the observation of the body along the body"? What is mindfulness? What is a foundation of mindfulness?  The marks of the body, briefly, are of thirty-five sorts: the inner body, the outer body, the body included among the faculties, the body not included among the faculties, the body reckoned as a sentient being, the body not reckoned as a sentient being, the body co-arising with grossness, the body co-arising with pliancy, the producing body, the produced body, the mental body, the material body, the body of a hell-being, the body of an animal, the body of the ancestral land, the human body, the divine body, the body with consciousness, the body without consciousness, the middling body, the manifest body, the altering body, the unaltering body, the female body, the male body, the body of a paṇḍaka, the body of a friend, the body of a non-friend, the neutral body, the inferior body, the middling body, the excellent body, the infant body, the young body, and the aged body — these are the differentiations of the marks of the body.  What is abiding in observation of the body along the body? In brief it has three forms: wisdom born of hearing, reflection, and cultivation with the body as their predominant basis. Through these three forms of wisdom, one correctly observes and investigates every body and every bodily mark, following and knowing them as they are. This is abiding in observation of the body along the body.

 What is mindfulness? Taking the body as predominant, one receives and retains the true Dharma, reflects on its meaning, and cultivates it for direct realization. Throughout the cultivation and realization of both wording and meaning, the mind does not forget. This is named mindfulness.

 What is a foundation of mindfulness? One carefully asks: "Am I correctly retaining the true Dharma, or not? Do I comprehend each meaning well through wisdom, or not? Can I personally touch and realize each liberation, or not?" To settle mindfulness through such careful, truthful examination is named a foundation of mindfulness.

 The name also has three further senses: guarding mindfulness, remaining undefiled by objects, and settling mindfulness on its object. Guarding mindfulness is expressed in teachings such as "first guard mindfulness" and "remain constantly mindful." Remaining undefiled by objects means guarding the mind through mindfulness, moving in an even state, grasping neither the general sign nor the secondary marks, and continuing through guarding the mental faculty and cultivating its restraint. Settling mindfulness on its object means settling it on the four objects: the pervasive, conduct-purifying, skillfulness, and affliction-purifying objects. Because mindfulness is well established through these three aspects, it is named a foundation of mindfulness.

The foundation of mindfulness of feeling. What is feeling? First there are pleasant feeling, painful feeling, and feeling that is neither-painful-nor-pleasant. Each has a bodily and a mental form: pleasant, painful, and neither-painful-nor-pleasant bodily feeling, and pleasant, painful, and neither-painful-nor-pleasant mental feeling. Each of the three also occurs in four classes: pleasant, painful, and neutral feeling with the relish of craving; the same three without that relish; the same three grounded in indulgent attachment; and the same three grounded in renunciation. Thus there are in all twenty-one feelings; they may also be stated in brief as nine kinds of feeling. Item by item: pleasant feeling is the "even feeling" included under feeling and arisen conditioned by contact conducive to pleasure; painful feeling is the "uneven feeling" included under feeling and arisen conditioned by contact conducive to pain; neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling is the "neither-even-nor-uneven feeling" included under feeling and arisen conditioned by contact conducive to neither pain nor pleasure. When these three are associated with the first five consciousnesses, they are called bodily feeling; when associated with mental consciousness, they are called mental feeling. Feelings that accord with nirvāṇa and discernment, ultimately renounce, are ultimately free of stain, and ultimately bring the holy life to fulfillment are called feelings without the relish of craving; those that fall within the three realms are called feelings with the relish of craving. Those bound to the form or formless realm, or according with freedom from desire, are called feelings grounded in renunciation; those bound to the desire realm, or not according with freedom from desire, are called feelings grounded in indulgent attachment.

The foundation of mindfulness of mind. What is mind? There are twenty kinds: mind with greed and free of greed; with hatred and free of hatred; with delusion and free of delusion; contracted and distracted; lowered and uplifted; agitated and unagitated; peaceful and unpeaceful; concentrated and unconcentrated; well cultivated and poorly cultivated; well liberated and poorly liberated.

 What is mind with greed? It is a mind bound by the entanglement of greed toward an attractive object. What is mind free of greed? It is a mind removed from that entanglement. Mind with hatred is bound by hatred toward a repellent object, while mind free of hatred is removed from it. Mind with delusion is bound by delusion regarding an object about which one can be confused, while mind free of delusion is removed from it. These six are the three afflictive classes and their counteractives as they arise during activity.

 What is contracted mind? Through correct practice, it binds itself to an inward object. Distracted mind flows outward among the five desirable objects. Lowered mind accompanies dullness and drowsiness. Uplifted mind clearly manifests a pure and sublime object. Agitated mind is excessively uplifted and shaken by agitation. Unagitated mind maintains even equanimity whether uplifted or contracted. Peaceful mind has been liberated from the hindrances; unpeaceful mind has not.

 What is concentrated mind? Having been freed from the hindrances, it can enter a fundamental absorption. Unconcentrated mind cannot yet enter. Well-cultivated mind has long habituated itself to concentration and can enter it swiftly, at will, without difficulty or obstruction. Poorly cultivated mind is the opposite. Well-liberated mind is ultimately liberated from every affliction; poorly liberated mind is not ultimately liberated from them all.

 These latter fourteen minds arise during abiding. Eight arise on the ground of purifying the hindrances, from contracted and distracted through peaceful and unpeaceful mind. Six arise on the ground of purifying afflictions, from concentrated and unconcentrated through well- and poorly liberated mind.

 When hindrances are present within, one knows, "Hindrances are present in me"; when absent, one knows they are absent. One also knows when previously unarisen hindrances arise and when arisen hindrances disperse and cease. In the same way, one knows whether fetters are present or absent at the eye through the mind, when previously unarisen fetters arise, and when arisen fetters disperse and cease.

The foundation of mindfulness of dharmas. What are dharmas here? They are greed and the dharma that disciplines greed; hatred and its discipline; delusion and its discipline; contracted and distracted dharmas; lowered and uplifted dharmas; agitated and unagitated dharmas; peaceful and unpeaceful dharmas; concentrated and unconcentrated dharmas; well- and poorly cultivated dharmas; and well- and poorly liberated dharmas. Through these contrasts, twenty dharmas are established in dark and bright, defiled and purified classes.

 When the awakening factor of mindfulness is present within, one knows it is present; when absent, one knows it is absent. One knows when it arises after not having arisen, and when, after arising, it abides, is not forgotten, is cultivated to fulfillment, is cultivated still further, increases, and becomes vast. The same should be understood for investigation of dharmas, effort, joy, tranquillity, concentration, and equanimity.

 To know thoroughly and as they truly are the intrinsic nature, causes and conditions, dangers, and counteractives of all defiled dharmas is the essence of the foundation of mindfulness of dharmas.

As has been said of the mindfulness and the foundation of mindfulness of the foundation of mindfulness of the body, so it is likewise, according to what fits, for the foundations of mindfulness of feeling, mind, and dharmas.

The four foundations of mindfulness counteract the four inversions. To counteract taking the impure as pure, mindfulness of the body is established. In observation of the body, the World-Honored One taught the four charnel-ground contemplations associated with impurity; repeated reflection on them ends the inversion of purity. To counteract taking suffering as pleasure, mindfulness of feeling is established. By observing feelings and knowing as it truly is that every feeling is suffering, one ends the inversion of pleasure. To counteract taking the impermanent as permanent, mindfulness of mind is established. One observes minds with greed and the other varieties arising and ceasing through days, nights, moments, instants, and brief intervals in many distinct classes, and thereby ends the inversion of permanence. To counteract taking what is without self as self, mindfulness of dharmas is established. Because self-view and other afflictions were formerly present while insight into no-self and other wholesome dharmas were absent, one projected self onto the aggregates. By observing dharmas and knowing the particular and common characteristics of the aggregates as they truly are, one ends the inversion of self.

 There is another distinction. Most people do not know as it truly is that aggregates are only aggregates and dharmas only dharmas. They wrongly imagine a self supported by the body, experiencing pain and pleasure through that body and becoming defiled or purified through dharma and non-dharma. Mindfulness of the body removes confusion about the supposed self's support. Mindfulness of feeling removes confusion about what the supposed self experiences. Mindfulness of mind removes confusion that grasps mind, mentation, or consciousness as self. Mindfulness of dharmas removes confusion about what supposedly defiles or purifies that self-mind.

 There is another distinction concerning karma: on what basis karma is made, for what purpose it is made, what makes it, and through what it is made. The four foundations disclose all of these: karma is made in dependence on the body, for the sake of feeling; mind makes karma; and wholesome or unwholesome dharmas are the means through which it is made.

 There is another distinction concerning defilement and purification: on what basis they occur, for what purpose they arise, what is defiled or purified, and through what they are accomplished. The four foundations disclose all of these: body is the basis of defilement and purification; they arise for the sake of feeling; mind is what becomes defiled or purified; and dharmas are that through which defilement and purification occur.

Question: What does "foundation of mindfulness" mean? Answer: Both "mindfulness abides on this" and "mindfulness abides by means of this" are called foundations of mindfulness. The first is the object that serves as the foundation. In the second, wisdom or mindfulness holds the mind in concentration and is the intrinsic foundation; the remaining associated minds and mental factors are commingled foundations. Wholesome contaminated and uncontaminated paths born under the predominance of body, feeling, mind, or dharmas are also called foundations of mindfulness. They are of three kinds: formed through hearing, reflection, and cultivation. Those formed through hearing and reflection are contaminated only; those formed through cultivation may be contaminated or uncontaminated.

〔Within the Basic Section, the Śrāvaka Stage, the thirteenth, the second yoga-station, part four.〕

The Six Detailed Mappings of Inner, Outer, and Inner-and-Outer

The distinction among inner, outer, and inner-and-outer has six mappings:

 First: one's own inner bodily form reckoned among sentient beings is the inner body; external form not reckoned among sentient beings is the outer body; the external bodily form of another sentient being is the inner-and-outer body. Feelings, minds, and dharmas arisen in dependence on one's own body, external non-sentient form, or another's sentient body are respectively the inner, outer, and inner-and-outer three observations.

 Second: form included among the faculties and appropriated is the inner body; form not included among the faculties and unappropriated is the outer body; form not included among the faculties yet appropriated is the inner-and-outer body. Feelings, minds, and dharmas arisen in dependence on these three forms are, according to what fits, the corresponding three observations.

 Third: one's own inner form co-arising with pliancy on a concentrated ground is the inner body; one's own inner form co-arising with grossness on a non-concentrated ground is the outer body; another's form co-arising with pliancy or with grossness is the inner-and-outer body. Feelings, minds, and dharmas arisen in dependence on these three forms are, according to what fits, the corresponding three observations.

 Fourth: inner great-element form that produces other form is the inner body; external great-element form that produces other form is the outer body; produced form included among faculties and objects and arisen in dependence on the producing great elements is the inner-and-outer body. Feelings, minds, and dharmas arisen in dependence on these three forms are, according to what fits, the corresponding three observations.

 Fifth: the inner form of a body with consciousness is the inner body; form in the livid and other phases of a body without consciousness yet reckoned among sentient beings is the outer body; a body-without-consciousness form that was conscious in the past, and a body-with-consciousness form that will be without consciousness in the future, taken as objects under their similar and even dharma-nature, are the inner-and-outer body. Feelings, minds, and dharmas arisen in dependence on these three forms are, according to what fits, the corresponding three observations.

 Sixth: the hair, body-hair, nails, teeth, and other marks of one's own inner middle body are the inner body; those marks in another's middle body are the outer body; the altered and unaltered livid and other marks of one's inner manifest body together with those of an outer manifest body, taken as objects under their similar and even dharma-nature, are the inner-and-outer body. Feelings, minds, and dharmas arisen in dependence on these three forms are, according to what fits, the corresponding three observations. The differentiating gateways of body, feeling, mind, and dharmas are thus of many kinds; here only a small portion is shown.

(b) The Four Right Exertions

Having thus habituated the four foundations of mindfulness, one is already able to remove the coarse-and-gross inversions and to comprehend wholesome and unwholesome dharmas. From this, without interval, one works so that not-yet-arisen evil, unwholesome dharmas may not arise, so that already-arisen evil, unwholesome dharmas may be cut off, so that not-yet-arisen wholesome dharmas may arise, and so that already-arisen wholesome dharmas may abide and not be forgotten, down through bracing the mind and holding the mind.  Evil, unwholesome dharmas = the defiled bodily, verbal, and mental actions bound to the desire realm (included among evil conduct), and the afflictions able to give rise to them; not yet conjoined and not yet manifestly present is called not-yet-arisen; already conjoined and already manifestly present is called already-arisen. Wholesome dharmas = that which counteracts them / counteracts the hindrances / counteracts the fetters; not-yet-arisen and already-arisen are as before.  Giving rise to zeal: toward not-yet-arisen evil, unwholesome dharmas, one raises the aspiration, "I shall cause them, one and all, never to arise again"; toward already-arisen evil, unwholesome dharmas, one raises the aspiration, "Toward them, one and all, I shall not consent, but shall cut off, destroy, and remove them." Again, those dharmas take as object past / future / present things, or take as object an object not-presently-seen (past and future) / an object presently-seen (present). Spurring oneself on = toward the evil, unwholesome dharmas that "take as object an object not-presently-seen," so that the not-yet-arisen may not arise and the already-arisen may be forever cut off, one spurs and braces oneself; exerting diligent effort = toward those [that take as object an object presently-seen], valiant right striving. Why? Only by remaining firm, spurring and bracing oneself, and striving valiantly and rightly can one cause them either not to arise again or to be forever cut off. Again, toward the enwrapments of the low and middling classes one spurs oneself on; toward the enwrapment of the high class one exerts diligent effort. Again, coursing amid past and future objects so as not to let the afflictions arise (and if they momentarily arise, cutting them off swiftly) = spurring oneself on; coursing amid the present object = exerting diligent effort. Again, an evil, unwholesome dharma arises either through the force of discrimination alone (pondering past and future objects at the time of abiding) or through the force of discrimination together with the force of the object (taking the present object as object at the time of active engagement) — for the former, causing the not-yet-arisen not to arise and being able to cut off what has arisen = spurring oneself on; for the latter = exerting diligent effort.  Giving rise to zeal for wholesome dharmas: toward wholesome dharmas not yet obtained, not yet manifestly present, one raises a keen zeal to obtain them, a zeal for their manifest presence, so as to bring them into manifest presence; toward wholesome dharmas already obtained, already manifestly present, one raises a zeal to make them firmly abide, a zeal that they not be forgotten, a zeal to cultivate them to fulfilment — causing them to abide (once obtained, not lost, not fallen back from), causing them not to be forgotten (clear and manifest, without dullness), causing their cultivation to be fulfilled (cultivated over and over, brought to complete fulfilment). Spurring oneself on = so that what is already obtained may be made manifestly present, so that already-arisen wholesome [dharmas] may abide and not be forgotten; exerting diligent effort = so that what is not yet obtained may be obtained, and cultivated to fulfilment. Wholesome dharmas of the low and middling classes = spurring oneself on; wholesome dharmas of the high class = exerting diligent effort.  Bracing the mind = when cultivating tranquillity, if the mind inwardly becomes overly contracted and inferior (or one fears it will become inferior), one then takes up some pure and excellent uplifting sign and diligently braces and gladdens the mind. Holding the mind = when cultivating uplift, if the mind becomes agitated and stirred (or one fears it will become agitated), one then again inwardly gathers the mind a little and cultivates tranquillity.  These four are also called the four right supremacies (toward the black class, causing the not-yet-arisen not to arise and the already-arisen to be cut off; toward the white class, causing the not-yet-arisen to arise and the already-arisen to be fulfilled — in each case "giving rise to zeal, spurring oneself on, exerting diligent effort, bracing the mind, holding the mind"). They are also called the four right exertions: the exertion of restraint (already-arisen evil, unwholesome [dharmas] to be cut off · one should cultivate restraint so as to cut them off and not consent to them), the exertion of cutting-off (not-yet-arisen evil, unwholesome [dharmas] to prevent from arising · cutting off for the sake of cutting off), the exertion of cultivation (not-yet-arisen wholesome [dharmas] to be made to arise · cultivating over and over so that they become manifestly present, able to cut off), the exertion of protection (already-arisen wholesome [dharmas] to be made to abide · keeping far from heedlessness, cultivating heedfulness, protecting the wholesome dharmas, able to cut off). The gist: it displays, within the affair of abandoning and taking up the black and white classes, "the fulfilment of the predominant intention" (through giving rise to zeal) and "the fulfilment of the applied practice" (through spurring oneself on, exerting diligent effort, bracing the mind, holding the mind). The yoga-practitioner has only just this much that ought to be done — so as to cut off what ought to be cut off and obtain what ought to be obtained, first he gives rise to aspiration and zeal-and-longing; so as to cut off the enwrapments, from time to time he cultivates the signs of tranquillity, uplift, and equanimity; so as to cut off the enwrapments together with the latent proclivities, he further cultivates the counteracting wholesome dharmas. To display all this, the four right supremacies and the four right exertions are taught.

(c) The Four Bases of Psychic Power

From this one further cultivates the four concentrations: the concentration of aspiration, of effort, of mind, and of investigation (the concentrations obtained through the predominant force of aspiration / effort / mind / investigation).  The concentration obtained through the predominant force of aspiration = after zeal alone has arisen, one rightly and carefully examines the intrinsic nature, causes and conditions, perils, and counteractives of the evil, unwholesome dharmas and gives rise to single-object mindfulness; and one rightly and carefully examines the intrinsic nature, causes and conditions, benefits, and renunciation of the wholesome dharmas and abides in single-object mindfulness; through cultivating this much, one touches one-pointedness, able to cause the presently-operating enwrapments to become distant (yet not having forever harmed the latent proclivities). The predominant force of effort = toward that which, in the three times, is conducive to evil, unwholesome dharmas and to the enwrapping afflictions of the low, middling, and high classes, causing the not-yet-arisen not to arise and the already-arisen to be cut off, one spurs and braces oneself and exerts diligent effort, and rightly and carefully examining, abides in single-object mindfulness, able rightly to give rise to one-pointedness of mind (yet not having forever harmed the latent proclivities). The predominant force of mind = spurring on the inferior mind, restraining and holding the agitated mind, and from time to time cultivating the predominant equanimity; rightly and carefully examining, abiding in single-object mindfulness, one gives rise to one-pointedness of mind. The predominant force of investigation = toward attention conducive to evil, unwholesome dharmas [taking it] as contrary-to-principle, and toward attention conducive to wholesome dharmas [taking it] as in-accord-with-principle, one keeps far from the enwrapments and gives rise to the wholesome dharmas that counteract the enwrapments, causing the evil, unwholesome dharmas not to operate; one then ponders for oneself, "Are presently-existing evil, unwholesome dharmas present without my being aware of them? Or are presently-existing evil, unwholesome dharmas absent without my being aware of their absence? I should now examine this thoroughly and carefully." Through the predominant force of this examining attention, he rightly examines for himself what is cut off and not yet cut off, rightly and carefully examines, abides in single-object mindfulness, and is able to touch-and-realize one-pointedness of mind — and thereby, "free of overweening pride," one truly knows for oneself, "I have only, with respect to the enwrapments, obtained liberation of mind; I have not, with respect to all the latent proclivities, obtained liberation of mind; I have only obtained and cultivated the wholesome dharmas headed by concentration that counteract the enwrapments, but have not obtained or cultivated the counteractive to the latent proclivities."  Having, through the four concentrations, made the enwrapments distant, then, so as to forever harm all the latent proclivities and to cultivate and amass the counteracting wholesome dharmas, one again gives rise to zeal and spurs oneself on (as in the applied practice of the four right exertions above); and while rightly cultivating there are the eight exertions of cutting-off, which operate so as to forever harm the latent proclivities and so that the concentration may be fulfilled. Which eight? (1) Aspiration (the hope-and-longing, "When shall my cultivation of concentration be fulfilled? When shall I cut off the latent proclivities?"); (2) spurring-oneself-on (down through cultivating the counteractive, not abandoning the applied practice); (3) faith (through not abandoning the applied practice and abiding rightly, giving rise to deep faith-and-conviction in what is realized above); (4) tranquillity (with pure faith foremost, the mind gives rise to gladness, and gradually the grossness of the evil, unwholesome class subsides); (5) mindfulness (the nine aspects; abiding the mind upon the nine aspects, upholding it by the tranquillity-class); (6) right knowing (the wisdom of the insight-class); (7) volition (the mind's shaping activity; when rightly observing what is cut off and not yet cut off, it shapes the mind and sets in motion bodily and verbal action conducive to tranquillity and insight); (8) equanimity (amid the past, future, and present [factors] conducive to evil, unwholesome dharmas, the mind's being undefiled, the mind's even state; through the pondering of the object-as-not-presently-seen and the equanimity toward the object-as-presently-seen, discerningly knowing the cutting-off of the latent proclivities). These eight exertions of cutting-off are also called the eminent practices.  These eight exertions of cutting-off are just "the yoga for harming the latent proclivities": aspiration = that aspiration; spurring-oneself-on = that effort; faith = that faith; tranquillity, mindfulness, right knowing, volition, and equanimity = that means. Whether the aspiration and the rest — the four concentrations spoken of first — or the eight exertions of cutting-off now spoken of, when, at the forever-cutting-off of all the latent proclivities, the concentration is fulfilled and fully accomplished, all together are named "the concentration of aspiration / effort / mind / investigation, accomplished through the exertions of cutting-off, a base of psychic power."  Question: Why is it called a "base of psychic power"? Answer: Just as one who has feet is able to go and to return, to leap and be vigorous, and is able to obtain and realize the excellent dharmas of the world (the excellent dharma being named "power," and that by which one reaches it being named "foot"); likewise, one for whom concentration is fulfilled and fully accomplished — the mind being pure and bright, free of the secondary afflictions, abiding upright, capable, and having attained the unshakable — is able to go and to return, to leap and be vigorous, and is able to obtain and realize the supramundane dharma (the supreme sovereignty of the supramundane dharma being the supreme "power," and that by which one realizes it being named "foot").

(d) The Five Faculties and the Five Powers

Taking excellent concentration as support, one is able to advance in the cultivation of the yoga of the higher training in mind and the higher training in wisdom; whereby, toward what has been realized by the Great Teacher and his disciples, one gives rise to deep resolute-conviction and pure faith — because this pure faith is "predominant," it is called the faculty of faith (Question: predominant with respect to what? Answer: it is foremost with respect to being able to give rise to the supramundane dharma, and it is predominant with respect to being able to arouse effort, mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom; effort and the rest are likewise predominant with respect to giving rise to the supramundane dharma and, in sequence down to wisdom; wisdom is predominant only with respect to giving rise to the supramundane dharma — hence faith and the rest are called the five faculties).  If one knows the difference between what was realized earlier and later, and accordingly gives rise to deep resolute-conviction and pure faith in the ever-later supramundane dharma realized — because this pure faith is "hard to overpower," it is called the power of faith. Question: Who is unable to overpower it? Answer: this pure faith — no deva, no Māra, no ascetic, no brahmin, none else in the world is able by any lawful means to draw it away; nor can the afflictive enwrapments bend it — hence it is called hard-to-overpower; being foremost and going first, effort and the rest are likewise called powers — these powers possess great might, able to crush all the might of Māra's armies and to realize the forever-ending of all the contaminants, and so they are called powers.  One should observe here: the faculty of faith and the power of faith = the pure faith among the four purities-of-clarity (the purity-of-clarity of one who has entered the certainty of rightness is due entirely to this cause-and-condition, and is its predominant fruit; on the principle of the mutual belonging of cause and effect it is said to be "just that purity-of-clarity," not that it is that in essence or in mark); the faculty of effort and the power of effort = the effort among the four right exertions (the effortful right cutting-off able to forever cut off all the afflictions to be abandoned on the path of seeing); the faculty of mindfulness and the power of mindfulness = the right mindfulness among the four foundations of mindfulness (able without remainder to cut off all the inversions); the faculty of concentration and the power of concentration = the right concentration among the four meditative absorptions (as a means to realize the fruit of non-returning); the faculty of wisdom and the power of wisdom = the right knowledge among the four noble truths (realizing direct comprehension with respect to the four truths and obtaining the fruits of the ascetic life).  Through these faculties and powers, cultivated gradually, practised gradually, and cultivated much gradually, one is then able to give rise to the low, middling, and high classes of the four wholesome roots conducive to penetration: warmth, summit, the acceptance-in-accord-with-the-truths, and the supreme worldly dharma. The fire-drilling simile: just as a person who drills fire lays dry wood below and applies the drill-and-fire above, and diligently, bracing himself, valiantly drills and seeks — upon the lower wood warmth first arises (a simile for the "warmth" wholesome root, which is the forerunning sign of the uncontaminated dharma-fire that burns the afflictions); as the warmth increases, the hot vapor rises upward (a simile for "summit"); next smoke issues forth (a simile for "the acceptance-in-accord-with-the-truths"); a flameless fire suddenly streams out (a simile for "the supreme worldly dharma"); the fire, without interval, gives rise to fierce flames (a simile for the supramundane uncontaminated noble dharma arisen without interval from the five faculties and five powers included within the supreme worldly dharma); and once the fire has come forth, it is able to perform the work of fire.

(e) The Seven Awakening-Factors

What is this supramundane uncontaminated noble dharma? It is the seven awakening-factors — the person who has entered the certainty of rightness employs these seven as the limbs of his true awakening-wisdom, and so they are named awakening-factors. The seven awakening-factors are included within three classes: discernment-of-dharmas, effort, and joy = the insight (vipaśyanā) class; tranquillity, concentration, and equanimity = the tranquillity (śamatha) class; mindfulness alone is included within both classes and is named all-pervading. At that time one first obtains the seven awakening-factors, and is named "one who, being at first a trainee, has seen the traces of the noble truths," having forever cut off all the afflictions to be abandoned on the path of seeing, with only the afflictions to be abandoned on the path of cultivation remaining.

(f) The Eightfold Noble Path and the Discipline Beloved of the Noble Ones

So as to cut off the afflictions to be abandoned on the path of cultivation, one cultivates "the eightfold noble path included within the three aggregates": right view, right thought, right effort = the aggregate of wisdom; right speech, right action, right livelihood = the aggregate of discipline; right mindfulness, right concentration = the aggregate of concentration.  Question: Why is it named the eightfold noble path? Answer: the noble trainees who have already seen the traces, through the right path with its course of practice included within the eight limbs, are able without remainder to cut off all the afflictions and to bring liberation to ultimate realization — hence it is named the eightfold noble path.  Right view = the true awakening obtained at the time of the awakening-factors, together with the awakening, after obtaining that, whereby one awakens by wisdom just as one has realized; the two together are named right view. Right thought = the discriminative thinking of renunciation, non-malice, and non-harm arisen through the predominance of right view. If the mind enters into the various things to be thought upon, it thinks only thoughts having these characteristics. Right speech = giving rise, through the predominance of right view, to wholesome thinking, and setting in motion the various kinds of lawful discourse. Right action = when lawfully seeking robes, food and drink, seats and bedding, medicine, and bodily requisites, abiding with right knowing in going and returning, in looking and gazing, in bending and stretching, in bearing the robes, the bowl, and the outer robe, in eating, drinking, chewing, and tasting; and, at the time of abiding, with respect to the robes and other things already sought, abiding with right knowing in walking, standing, sitting, and lying down, down through relieving fatigue in sleep. Right livelihood = lawfully seeking robes, food and drink, down to requisites, keeping far from every dharma of wrong livelihood.  The right speech, action, and livelihood included under keeping-far were already obtained at the time of the awakening-factors when the uncontaminated attention was realized. Question: Why is it named the discipline beloved of the noble ones? Answer: the noble, virtuous, rightly-arrived ones, through the long night, love, admire, and delight in the thought, "When shall I rightly obtain the restraint that is the not-committing of verbal evil conduct, bodily evil conduct, and affairs of wrong livelihood?" — because through the long night they deeply love, admire, and delight in this virtue-of-discipline (śīla), when they obtain it, it is named "beloved of the noble ones." Having obtained this discipline beloved of the noble ones, they never knowingly speak falsehood, never intentionally harm a life, never intentionally take what is not given, never intentionally engage in wrong conduct with respect to desire, never unlawfully seek robes and the rest. Through the predominant force of the discipline beloved of the noble ones, at the time of the path of cultivation the operation of verbal action, bodily action, and the affairs of sustaining life also come to be named right speech, action, and livelihood.  For one who diligently cultivates in dependence on right view together with right thought, right speech, action, and livelihood, all the zeal, effort, striving, valorous renunciation, and rousing of might that brace the mind, continuous and without interval, is named right effort. For one who has accomplished right effort, through the predominant force of the four foundations of mindfulness there is the uninverted right mindfulness included within the nine aspects, able to gather the mind that abides through the nine aspects — this is right mindfulness and right concentration.  The eightfold noble path is set up in two kinds altogether: that which has nothing to do (right speech, right action, right livelihood) and that which has abiding-work to do (tranquillity and insight: right view, right thought, right effort = insight; right mindfulness, right concentration = tranquillity). Taking pure right speech, action, and livelihood as support, from time to time one cultivates tranquillity and insight, able to cut off the fetters 〔for "able to cut off," the base reading has "cut off"; the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Sheng editions read "realize" (able to realize the fetters) — the base reading here follows the Taishō "cut off," while the four editions' variant "realize" is recorded alongside (0445b22)〕, forever cutting off without remainder, able to obtain the supreme fruit of arhatship. Long-continued and unbroken, it is named the path of cultivation (long habituation cutting off the afflictions); the moment the knowledge arises it is able to forever cut off, and this is named the path of seeing (knowledge arising momentarily is at once able to forever cut off the afflictions) — right speech, action, and livelihood are only then established within the path of cultivation.

Through thus cultivating in gradual sequence the applied means of the thirty-seven factors of awakening, this is named the cultivation of the factors of awakening.

聲聞地 · 第二瑜伽處 · 修果 · 補特伽羅異門 · 四魔The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · Second Yoga-Station · The Fruits of Cultivation · Alternate Terms for the Person · The Four Māras

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

第二瑜伽處的收尾:修的「果」(四沙門果)、三種行者修加行的快慢差別、補特伽羅(數取趣)的六種異名、八種補特伽羅與建立因緣、四魔與魔事、以及「白費功夫、空無所成」的三種原因。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

一、修果——四沙門果

什麼是修果?就是四沙門果:一、預流果,二、一來果,三、不還果,四、最上阿羅漢果。這裡「沙門」是什麼?「果」是什麼?——聖道名沙門,煩惱斷名果;又後生的中品或上品道,是前生道所生之果。

問:何故建立這四果?答:為對治四種煩惱。  預流果:那能感惡趣、是往惡趣之因的煩惱斷了,及能斷它的對治道生起,便立預流果。而世尊說「永斷三結」立此果——依三品有三種結障礙聖道令不生:依在家品有「薩迦耶見」(由此見先生怖畏,最初不想發趣聖道)、依惡說法毗奈耶品有「戒禁取」(由此雖已發趣卻行邪僻,不能生聖道)、依善說法毗奈耶品有「疑」(由此雖發趣不邪僻,卻於正道未串習而猶豫疑惑,障聖道不生)。所以唯說斷此三結立預流果。此預流果至多還受七有(故多生相續)。  一來果:若斷「再生相續」的煩惱、令生不重續,立一來果——永斷天有、人有所攝的再生相續煩惱,至多再受天有一生、人有一生。  不還果:若已永斷「能感還來生此」的煩惱,唯於天有當受生,立不還果。  阿羅漢果:若已永斷一切能感生有的煩惱,立最上阿羅漢果。  世尊又說:永斷三結、縛貪瞋癡〔此字大正底本作「縛」、宋·元·明·聖四本作「薄」(一來果義為貪瞋癡微薄、遁倫釋亦作「薄」)——一字異讀,存底本「縛」、錄異本「薄」,兩讀並錄〕,立一來果;永斷能順五下分結,立不還果;永斷一切煩惱究竟,立最上阿羅漢果。這就是修果。

二、三種行者修加行的差別(等分行·薄塵行)

又:貪、瞋、癡、慢、尋思行的人,須先以淨行所緣(五停心)淨修其行,然後才證心安住——他各別依所緣境界、由所緣差別之力勤修加行。而等分行的人,隨所愛樂攀緣彼境勤修,這樣修「只令心住,並不淨其行」;薄塵行的人也一樣。三者修加行的快慢有別:貪等行者要經久遠才證心住,等分行者不太久遠就證心住,薄塵行者最極速疾就證心住。

問:前面已廣說貪等行者的行相差別,等分行、薄塵行者有什麼行相? 答:等分行者——貪等行者所有的行相,他一切都有;但其行相非上、非勝(不像貪等行那麼盛),隨所遇緣有差別,施設這行與彼相似。  薄塵行者的行相差別是:無重障、最初清淨、資糧已具、多清淨信、成就聰慧、具諸福德、具諸功德。  什麼是無重障? 就是沒有三種障。哪三種?第一是業障,第二是煩惱障,第三是異熟障。

 業障,是五無間業,以及其餘所有出於故意思而造的特別重大之業。這些業的異熟果一旦成就,便能障礙正道,使正道不能生起;這就名為業障。煩惱障,是猛利的煩惱與長時相續的煩惱。由這些煩惱障蔽,在現法之中,即使用種種淨行所緣,也不能使其行清淨;這就名為煩惱障。異熟障,一類是所生之處的異熟果使聖道依彼不能生起、不能增長;另一類是聖道依彼雖能生起、增長,所生異熟卻使人聾騃愚鈍、盲瞽瘖瘂,只能用手勢代替言語,沒有力量、沒有能力了解善說法與惡說法的義理;這就名為異熟障。三障都沒有,才名為無重障。

 什麼是最初清淨? 就是善淨戒與正直見。善淨戒,是由前面所說十種因緣,使所受戒律善能清淨。正直見則由四種行相得名正直。

 第一,正直見與淨信相應。因為與淨信相應,所以對佛陀的正法及毘奈耶,任何人都不能把他引離、奪走。第二,正直見與勝解相應。因為與勝解相應,所以對諸如來及聖弟子不可思議的威德神力、不可思議的生處差別、甚深法教及不可記之事,深深生起勝解,沒有驚愕,沒有恐懼,也沒有怖畏。第三,正直見遠離誑諂。因為遠離誑諂,所以他的見解正直,屬於正直一類;他依聖教如實正修,也依自己的真實情況如實發露。第四,正直見能善思法義、無惑無疑、加行出離。因此,他對一切法無常、苦、空、無我等義,善能正思惟、善能正籌量、善能正觀察;以此為因而無惑無疑,遠離兩條歧路,得以向上昇進。由這四相,前面所說的見才名為正直見;善淨戒與正直見具足,才名最初清淨。

 什麼是資糧已具? 廣說的資糧如前,簡略則有四種:第一福德資糧,第二智慧資糧,第三先世資糧,第四現法資糧。

 福德資糧,是由此因緣,今生獲得隨順修行的資生眾具與豐饒財寶,遇到真實福田作善知識,遠離種種障礙,因而能夠精勤修行。智慧資糧,是由此因緣成就聰慧,有力量、有能力了解善說法與惡說法的義理,並獲得隨順的法教、義教、教授與教誡。先世資糧,是由宿世已積集善根,所以今生獲得諸根成就。現法資糧,是今世具足求善法的欲樂,諸根成熟,具戒律儀及根律儀,如前所廣說。這四種資糧具足,名為資糧已具。

 什麼是多清淨信? 就是對大師沒有迷惑、沒有疑惑,深深生起清淨信與勝解;如同對大師如此,對正法、對所學也同樣沒有迷惑疑惑,深生淨信勝解;其餘廣說如前。什麼是成就聰慧? 就是由此聰慧,對法、對義都能迅速領受;經過久遠時間,對法、對義仍能不忘不失;又能迅速通達法義。

 什麼是具諸福德? 就是由這些福德,形色端嚴,眾人樂於觀看,能使人發起清淨信;少病無病而且長壽,言辭敦厚嚴肅,具有廣大宗族門葉,為大眾所知識,成就大福,常能獲得衣服等眾多資生用具,又受國王、大臣等人的供養、恭敬、尊重與讚歎。什麼是具諸功德? 就是本性已成就極少欲等種種功德;其相就是前面所說的沙門莊嚴。如此等類,名為薄塵行補特伽羅的行相差別。

三、補特伽羅異門——數取趣的六種異名

什麼是補特伽羅異門(不同的名稱)?有六種:一、沙門,二、婆羅門,三、梵行,四、苾芻,五、精勤,六、出家。

(一)沙門有四種:勝道沙門、說道沙門、活道沙門、壞道沙門。諸善逝(已證貪瞋癡無餘永盡)名勝道沙門;諸說正法者(為調伏貪瞋癡而說正法)名說道沙門;諸修善行者(為調伏貪瞋癡而勤修正行)名活道沙門;諸行邪行者(犯戒行惡法)名壞道沙門。  又:學、無學名勝道沙門(以無漏道摧滅見修所斷一切煩惱);若沒有為了菩提而勤修正行的如來與諸菩薩,則持三藏的聲聞眾名說道沙門(任持世俗法毗奈耶、轉正法眼令不斷);性情調善、為自己利益勤修正行、有羞有悔、愛樂正學的異生,為得未得、為觸未觸、為證未證而勤修加行,又有力量、有能力堪得未得、堪觸未觸、堪證未證,名活道沙門(由現有諸善法煗能生長聖慧命根,名「活」非「死」);犯戒多行惡法乃至實非梵行自稱梵行者,名壞道沙門(破壞正道根本、無力非生道之器,雖現有說正道教及證正道者而彼不得)。  世尊依此說:這初沙門乃至第四沙門,於外道沙門婆羅門教中空無所有;若於是處八支聖道安立可得,即於是處有初沙門乃至第四沙門。

(二)婆羅門有三種:種姓婆羅門(生在婆羅門家、從母親產門出生、父母圓備)、名想婆羅門(世間由想假立言說而名)、正行婆羅門(所作事決定究竟、已能驅擯惡不善法——如說「當知婆羅門更無有所作,所作事已辦,是謂婆羅門」)。

(三)梵行有三種:受遠離梵行(受學遠離一切非梵行的習婬欲法)、暫時斷梵行(諸異生由世間道離欲界欲)、畢竟斷梵行(諸聖者得不還果、復得阿羅漢果)。

(四)苾芻有五種:乞匃苾芻、自稱苾芻、名想苾芻、破壞煩惱苾芻、白四羯磨受具足戒苾芻。

(五)精勤有三種:止息犯戒精勤(遠離一切不善身語業)、止息境界精勤(密護根門、修防守念及常委念)、止息煩惱精勤(永斷見修所斷一切煩惱;又對先前所生起的欲尋思、恚尋思、害尋思,或貪、或瞋、或各種邪見,或忿、恨、覆、惱、誑、諂等能往那落迦等險惡趣的非沙門法,無論哪一種隨所生起,都不肯忍受,隨即斷滅、除遣、變吐)——此中略有二種止息煩惱:止息隨眠、止息諸纏。

(六)出家有二種:於善說法毗奈耶中出家者(苾芻、苾芻尼、式叉摩那、沙彌、沙彌尼;又若自能出離身中一切惡不善法,名真實出家)、於惡說法毗奈耶中出家者(諸外道,或全無衣、或壞色衣、或塗灰等增上外道及其餘眾多外道)。  所以說:若沙門、若婆羅門、若修梵行、若苾芻、若精勤者、若出家者——這一切都是「數取趣」的異門。

四、八種補特伽羅與建立因緣

補特伽羅略有八種,建立他們的因緣略有四種。  什麼是八種補特伽羅? 第一有堪能者,第二無堪能者,第三善知方便者,第四不善知方便者,第五有無間修者,第六無無間修者,第七已串修習者,第八未串修習者。  什麼是四種補特伽羅建立因緣? 第一,由根有差別,所以建立根已成熟者與根未成熟者。第二,由瑜伽有差別,所以建立善知瑜伽者與不善知瑜伽者。第三,由加行有差別,所以建立有無間、慇重修者與無無間、慇重修者。第四,由時間有差別,所以建立已長時修道者與未長時修道者。  這四種差別怎樣成為前八種補特伽羅的建立因緣? 根已成就,就是有堪能者;根未成就,就是無堪能者。善知瑜伽,就是善知方便者;不善知瑜伽,就是不善知方便者。有無間、慇重修,就是有無間修者,又名有常委修者;沒有無間、慇重修,就是無無間修者,又名無常委修者。已長時修道,就是已串修習者;未長時修道,就是未串修習者。由根、瑜伽、加行與時間四種差別,便這樣建立八種補特伽羅。  若補特伽羅的根尚未成就,那麼所有善知方便、有無間修、已串修習之事,即使如理、如法、如其善巧,也都不能成辦。若根雖成熟,卻還不善知善巧方便,所有應辦之事仍不能成辦。若根已成熟、善知方便,卻沒有無間修,就不能得到速疾通慧。若根已成熟、善知方便、有無間修,卻還沒有串習修道,自己所有應作之事仍未成辦。若根已成就、善知方便、有無間修、又已串修習,那麼所有應辦之事都能成辦,也能獲得速疾通慧,自己所有應作之事已經成辦。

五、四魔與魔事

當知諸魔略有四種,魔所作事有無量種,修觀行的瑜伽師應善遍知、當正遠離。  四魔:一、蘊魔(五取蘊),二、煩惱魔(三界一切煩惱),三、死魔(諸有情從彼彼有情眾殀喪殞歿),四、天魔(於勤修勝善、求超越蘊煩惱死三魔者,有生欲界最上天的天子、得大自在,為作障礙、發起種種擾亂事業)。  這四魔依四義建立:依「死所依」(已生現在五取蘊,方有死)、「能令死」(由煩惱感當來生,生已便有殀喪)、「正是死」(命根盡滅殀喪,是死自性)、「於死作障礙」(勤修超死者正加行時,天子魔得大自在能為障礙,令不能出死法、或經多時極艱難方能超越)。又魔對人或暫不得自在(世間道離欲的異生,或在此或生彼)、或得大自在(未離欲者,在魔手中隨欲所作;世間道離欲者仍被魔縛、未脫魔羂,因必還來生此界)。

什麼是魔事?  所有能引出離的善法欲一生起,便因耽著諸欲之力尋即退捨——這就是魔事。  已安住密護根門,卻於可愛的色聲香味觸法,由執取相、執取隨好而心樂趣入——這就是魔事。  已安住於食知量,卻於美味、不平等食,由貪愛欲而心樂趣入——這就是魔事。  已安住精勤修初夜後夜的覺寤瑜伽,卻於睡眠樂、偃臥樂、脇臥樂,由懈怠力而心樂趣入——這就是魔事。  已安住正知而住,卻於往來等事業時,見幼少盛年美色的女子等,由不如理執取相好而心樂趣入;或見世間諸妙好事、或於多事多所作中、或見在家出家眾歡娛雜處、或見惡友共住便生隨喜而心樂趣入——這一切都是魔事。  於佛法僧、苦集滅道、此世他世若生疑惑——這一切都是魔事。  住阿練若、樹下、塚間、空閑靜室時,若見廣大可怖畏事而驚恐毛豎;或見沙門婆羅門像、人非人像欻爾而來,不如正理地勸捨白品、勸取黑品——這一切都是魔事。  若於利養恭敬稱譽心樂趣入;或於慳吝、廣大希欲、不知喜足、忿恨覆惱及矯詐等「沙門莊嚴的所對治法」心樂趣入——這一切都是魔事。  如此等類無量無邊的諸魔事業,一切都是四魔所作,隨其所應應當正知。

六、發趣空無有果——白費功夫的三種原因

由三種因緣,正修行者雖精勤發趣,卻空無所成。哪三種?一、諸根未積集;二、教授不隨順;三、等持力微劣。  若諸根未積集,縱得隨順教授、強盛等持,精勤發趣仍空無有果;  若諸根雖已積集、等持力亦強盛,卻不得隨順教授,精勤發趣仍空無有果;  若諸根雖已積集、亦得隨順教授,而等持力不強盛,精勤發趣仍空無有果。  若諸根已積集、教授隨順、等持強盛,精勤發趣便決定有果。這就名為「由三因緣空無有果、由三因緣決定有果」。

〔第二瑜伽處竟。〕

The closing of the Second Yoga-Station: the "fruit" of cultivation (the four fruits of asceticism), the difference in pace among three kinds of practitioner as they cultivate the preparatory effort, the six alternate names for the person (pudgala, "the one who takes up existence again and again"), the eight kinds of person and the causes for their establishment, the four māras and the deeds of Māra, and the three reasons why one may "labor in vain and accomplish nothing." Technical terms are kept as of old; rendered clause by clause into today's language, without adding doctrinal exposition, without citing the treatises, without annotating the Sanskrit; where the treatise-text is compressed, the fuller sense is restored within 〔 〕.

1. The Fruits of Cultivation — the Four Fruits of Asceticism

What are the fruits of cultivation? They are the four fruits of asceticism: first, the fruit of stream-entry; second, the fruit of once-return; third, the fruit of non-return; fourth, the supreme fruit of the arhat. Here, what is "asceticism" (śramaṇa)? What is "fruit"? — The noble path is called "asceticism"; the cutting-off of afflictions is called "fruit." Again, the middling or superior path arisen in a later life is the fruit produced by the path of a former life.

Question: On what ground are these four fruits established? Answer: In order to counteract four kinds of affliction.  The fruit of stream-entry: when the affliction that draws on the evil destinies — that is a cause of going to the evil destinies — is cut off, and the counteracting path able to cut it off has arisen, then the fruit of stream-entry is established. And the World-Honored One spoke of "forever cutting off the three fetters" to establish this fruit — for in dependence on three classes there are three kinds of fetter that obstruct the noble path and keep it from arising: in dependence on the class of the householder there is the "view of the transitory collection as a self" (satkāya-dṛṣṭi) (because of this view one first gives rise to dread and, at the very outset, does not wish to set out toward the noble path); in dependence on the class of the ill-spoken discipline there is the "clinging to precepts and observances" (because of this, though one has already set out, one practices deviant ways and cannot give rise to the noble path); in dependence on the class of the well-spoken discipline there is "doubt" (because of this, though one has set out and is not deviant, one has not yet grown familiar with the right path and so hesitates and doubts, and this obstructs the noble path from arising). Therefore, the cutting off of just these three fetters is said to establish the fruit of stream-entry. This fruit of stream-entry at most still undergoes seven existences (hence a continuity through many births).  The fruit of once-return: if one cuts off the affliction of "reborn continuation," causing birth not to continue on again, the fruit of once-return is established — forever cutting off the affliction of reborn continuation subsumed under existence-as-a-god and existence-as-a-human, one will at most undergo one further existence as a god and one existence as a human.  The fruit of non-return: if one has already forever cut off the affliction "able to draw one back to be born here again," so that one is to be reborn only in existence-as-a-god, the fruit of non-return is established.  The fruit of the arhat: if one has already forever cut off every affliction able to draw on existence-with-birth, the supreme fruit of the arhat is established.  The World-Honored One further said: forever cutting off the three fetters, "binding" greed, hatred, and delusion 〔the character here reads 縛 "bind" in the Taishō base text, but the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Sheng editions read 薄 "attenuate" (the sense of the fruit of once-return being the attenuation of greed, hatred, and delusion; Dunlun's gloss also reads 薄) — a one-character variant reading; the base-text 縛 is kept and the variant 薄 recorded, both readings preserved together〕, establishes the fruit of once-return; forever cutting off what conduces to the five lower fetters, establishes the fruit of non-return; forever and finally cutting off every affliction, establishes the supreme fruit of the arhat. These are the fruits of cultivation.

2. The Difference among Three Kinds of Practitioner in Cultivating the Preparatory Effort (the Even-Portioned Type · the Thin-Dust Type)

Further: those of the greed-, hatred-, delusion-, conceit-, and discursive-thought types must first, by means of the objects for purifying conduct (the five stilling-the-mind contemplations), purify and cultivate their conduct, and only then realize the settling of the mind — each of them, in dependence on his particular object-field, by the force of the differing objects, diligently cultivates the preparatory effort. But those of the even-portioned type, following what they take delight in, latch onto that object and diligently cultivate; and this cultivation "only makes the mind settle; it does not purify their conduct." Those of the thin-dust type are the same. The three differ in the pace at which they cultivate the preparatory effort: those of the greed-and-the-rest types must pass a long time before realizing the settling of the mind; those of the even-portioned type realize the settling of the mind in not too long a time; those of the thin-dust type realize the settling of the mind most exceedingly swiftly.

Question: Earlier the modes of the greed-and-the-rest types of practitioner have been expounded at length; what are the modes of those of the even-portioned type and the thin-dust type? Answer: The even-portioned type — whatever modes the greed-and-the-rest types have, he too has them all; but his modes are neither superior nor excelling (not as intense as the greed-and-the-rest types), and, differing according to whatever conditions he meets, this type is designated as resembling those.  The thin-dust type's modal differences are: no heavy obstruction; purity from the very outset; the requisites already complete; abundant pure faith; the accomplishment of keen intelligence; possession of the various merits; and possession of the various qualities.  What is having no heavy obstruction? It is having none of the three obstructions. Which three? First, the karmic obstruction; second, the affliction obstruction; third, the maturational obstruction.

 The karmic obstruction consists of the five acts of immediate retribution and the other exceptionally grave acts intentionally performed. When the maturational fruit of those acts comes to fruition, it can obstruct the right path and keep it from arising; this is named the karmic obstruction. The affliction obstruction consists of fierce afflictions and afflictions that continue for a long time. Because of these afflictions, here in the present life, the various objects for purifying conduct cannot make one's conduct pure; this is named the affliction obstruction. The maturational obstruction is, in one case, the maturational fruit of birth in a place upon which the noble path cannot arise or grow; in another, although the noble path could arise and grow there, the maturation makes one deaf and dull-witted, blind and mute, using hand-signs in place of speech, without the strength or capacity to comprehend the meaning of the well-spoken and ill-spoken Dharma; this is named the maturational obstruction. Having none of these three is named having no heavy obstruction.

 What is purity from the very outset? It is well-purified discipline and upright view. Well-purified discipline is discipline made thoroughly pure by the ten causes and conditions stated before. Upright view is named upright by four modes.

 First, upright view is associated with pure faith. Because it is associated with pure faith, no one can draw one away from, or deprive one of, the Buddha's true Dharma and discipline. Second, upright view is associated with resolute conviction. Because it is associated with resolute conviction, toward the inconceivable majestic power and spiritual might of the Tathāgatas and noble disciples, their inconceivable differences of birthplace, the profound Dharma-teaching, and the unrecordable matters, one gives rise to deep resolute conviction, without alarm, fear, or dread. Third, upright view is apart from deceit and flattery. Because it is apart from deceit and flattery, one's view is upright and belongs to the upright class; one cultivates rightly as the noble teaching directs and discloses oneself exactly as one truly is. Fourth, upright view reflects well upon the Dharma and its meaning, is without perplexity or doubt, and applies itself to going forth. Thus, concerning the meanings of all dharmas as impermanent, suffering, empty, and without self, one reflects rightly and well, weighs rightly and well, and examines rightly and well; by this cause one is without perplexity or doubt, leaves the two divergent roads, and attains upward progress. By these four modes the view stated before is named upright view. The completeness of well-purified discipline and upright view is named purity from the very outset.

 What is having the requisites already complete? The requisites have been expounded at length before; in brief, they are four: first, the requisite of merit; second, the requisite of wisdom; third, the requisite of former lives; fourth, the requisite of the present Dharma.

 The requisite of merit is that by this cause one now obtains favorable provisions and abundant wealth, meets a true field of merit as a good spiritual friend, remains apart from obstacles, and is able to cultivate diligently. The requisite of wisdom is that by this cause one accomplishes keen intelligence, has the strength and capacity to comprehend the meaning of the well-spoken and ill-spoken Dharma, and obtains favorable teaching of the Dharma, teaching of its meaning, instruction, and admonition. The requisite of former lives is that, through accumulating wholesome roots in former lives, one now attains accomplishment of the faculties. The requisite of the present Dharma is that in this present life one has wholesome zeal for the Dharma, mature faculties, the discipline of restraint, and the discipline of the faculties, as expounded before. Having all four is named having the requisites already complete.

 What is abundant pure faith? It is being without perplexity or doubt toward the Great Teacher and giving rise deeply to pure faith and resolute conviction; as toward the Great Teacher, so likewise toward the Dharma and toward the training, with the rest as expounded before. What is the accomplishment of keen intelligence? It is that, by this intelligence, one swiftly receives the Dharma and its meaning, does not forget or lose the Dharma and its meaning even over a long time, and swiftly penetrates the Dharma and its meaning.

 What is possession of the various merits? By these merits one is comely and dignified in form, delightful to the multitude, and causes others to give rise to pure faith; one is little afflicted by illness or free of illness and long-lived, earnest and grave in speech, possessed of a great clan and lineage, known by the multitude, accomplished in great merit, often obtaining robes and other requisites of life, and receiving offering, reverence, honor, and praise from kings, great ministers, and others. What is possession of the various qualities? It is by nature already accomplishing the various qualities of exceedingly few desires and the rest; their marks are the adornments of the ascetic stated before. Such classes are named the modal differences of the person of the thin-dust type.

3. Alternate Terms for the Person — the Six Alternate Names for "the One Who Takes Up Existence"

What are the alternate terms for the person (the different names)? There are six: first, ascetic (śramaṇa); second, brahmin; third, one of pure conduct; fourth, monk (bhikṣu); fifth, one who strives; sixth, one gone forth.

(1) Ascetic is of four kinds: the ascetic of the surpassing path, the ascetic of the taught path, the ascetic of the living path, and the ascetic of the ruined path. The Well-Gone Ones (who have realized the remainderless, forever-ended state of greed, hatred, and delusion) are called ascetics of the surpassing path; those who teach the right Dharma (teaching the right Dharma so as to tame greed, hatred, and delusion) are called ascetics of the taught path; those who cultivate wholesome conduct (diligently cultivating right conduct so as to tame greed, hatred, and delusion) are called ascetics of the living path; those who practice deviant conduct (transgressing the precepts, practicing evil dharmas) are called ascetics of the ruined path.  Again: the learner and the beyond-learner are called ascetics of the surpassing path (by the uncontaminated path they crush the whole range of afflictions to be cut off by seeing and by cultivation); if there are no Tathāgatas and bodhisattvas who diligently cultivate right conduct for the sake of awakening, then the community of śrāvakas who uphold the Tripiṭaka are called ascetics of the taught path (upholding the conventional Dharma and discipline, keeping the eye of the right Dharma turning unbroken); an ordinary being who is by nature well-tamed, who diligently cultivates right conduct for his own benefit, who has a sense of shame and remorse, and who takes delight in the right training, diligently applies himself so as to attain what has not been attained, touch what has not been touched, and realize what has not been realized, and has the strength and capacity to attain what has not been attained, touch what has not been touched, and realize what has not been realized — this is called an ascetic of the living path (because he has present in him the warmth of the various wholesome dharmas, able to give rise to and nourish the life-faculty of the noble wisdom, he is "living," not "dead"); one who transgresses the precepts, much practices evil dharmas, and so on, down to one who, being in truth no practitioner of pure conduct, claims to practice pure conduct, is called an ascetic of the ruined path (he ruins the very root of the right path, has no power, and is no vessel for the arising path; though there be present the teaching that expounds the right path and those who realize the right path, he does not obtain it).  The World-Honored One in dependence on this said: this first ascetic and so on down to the fourth ascetic are, in the teachings of the outsider ascetics and brahmins, empty and utterly absent; where the noble eightfold path can be found established, there and only there is the first ascetic and so on down to the fourth ascetic.

(2) Brahmin is of three kinds: the brahmin by caste (born into a brahmin family, born through the mother's birth passage, with father and mother complete); the brahmin by name and notion (named in the world by a notion, provisionally set up in speech); and the brahmin of right conduct (whose task is definitely accomplished to the end, who has been able to drive out the evil and unwholesome dharmas — as it is said, "know that the brahmin has nothing further to do; his task being done, this is called a brahmin").

(3) One of pure conduct is of three kinds: pure conduct undertaken as seclusion (undertaking to train in the seclusion from all that is not pure conduct — the practice of the dharma of sexual desire); pure conduct as temporary cutting-off (ordinary beings who, by the mundane path, become free of desire for the desire-realm); and pure conduct as final cutting-off (the noble ones who attain the fruit of non-return, and further attain the fruit of the arhat).

(4) Monk is of five kinds: the monk who begs; the monk by self-declaration; the monk by name and notion; the monk who has ruined the afflictions; and the monk who has received the full precepts by the formal act of the fourfold motion.

(5) One who strives is of three kinds: striving that stills transgression of the precepts (being apart from all unwholesome bodily and verbal karma); striving that stills the object-fields (guarding closely the gates of the faculties, cultivating the mindfulness of defending and the ever-entrusted mindfulness); and striving that stills the afflictions (forever cutting off the whole range of afflictions to be cut off by seeing and by cultivation; and, toward any previously arisen thought of desire, thought of ill will, thought of harm, greed, hatred, wrong view, wrath, resentment, concealment, vexation, deceit, flattery, and other non-ascetic dharmas able to lead to dangerous evil destinies such as the hells, whatever arises, being able not to tolerate it and immediately cutting it off, dispelling it, and expelling it) — herein there are, in brief, two kinds of stilling the afflictions: stilling the latent proclivities and stilling the enwrapments.

(6) One gone forth is of two kinds: one gone forth within the well-spoken Dharma and discipline (the monk, the nun, the probationer, the male novice, the female novice; and again, one who is himself able to go forth from every evil and unwholesome dharma within his body is called one truly gone forth); and one gone forth within the ill-spoken Dharma and discipline (the various outsiders — some wholly without clothing, some in dyed-and-marred garments, some the ash-smearing and other overweening outsiders, and the rest of the many outsiders).  Therefore it is said: whether the ascetic, whether the brahmin, whether one who cultivates pure conduct, whether the monk, whether one who strives, whether one gone forth — all of these are alternate terms for "the one who takes up existence again and again."

4. The Eight Kinds of Person and the Causes for Their Establishment

The person is, in brief, of eight kinds, and the causes by which they are established are, in brief, of four kinds.  What are the eight kinds of person? First, one who has the capacity; second, one who has no capacity; third, one who well knows the skillful means; fourth, one who does not well know the skillful means; fifth, one who has uninterrupted cultivation; sixth, one who has no uninterrupted cultivation; seventh, one who has grown familiar through practice; eighth, one who has not grown familiar through practice.  What are the four causes for establishing the persons? First, by the difference of faculties, those whose faculties have matured and those whose faculties have not matured are established. Second, by the difference of yoga, those who well know yoga and those who do not well know yoga are established. Third, by the difference of preparatory effort, those who have uninterrupted and earnest cultivation and those who do not have uninterrupted and earnest cultivation are established. Fourth, by the difference of time, those who have cultivated the path for a long time and those who have not cultivated the path for a long time are established.  How do these four differences become the causes for establishing the former eight persons? Faculties already accomplished means one who has the capacity; faculties not yet accomplished means one who has no capacity. Well knowing yoga means one who well knows the skillful means; not well knowing yoga means one who does not well know the skillful means. Having uninterrupted and earnest cultivation means one who has uninterrupted cultivation, also called one who has ever-entrusted cultivation; lacking uninterrupted and earnest cultivation means one who has no uninterrupted cultivation, also called one who has no ever-entrusted cultivation. Having cultivated the path for a long time means one who has grown familiar through practice; not having cultivated it for a long time means one who has not grown familiar through practice. Thus, by the four differences of faculties, yoga, preparatory effort, and time, the eight persons are established.  If a person's faculties are not yet accomplished, then all the matters of well knowing skillful means, having uninterrupted cultivation, and having grown familiar through practice — even when approached in accord with principle, Dharma, and skill — cannot be brought about. If the faculties have matured but one does not yet well know the skillful means, the matters to be brought about still cannot be accomplished. If the faculties have matured and one well knows the skillful means but has no uninterrupted cultivation, one cannot attain swift penetrating knowledge. If the faculties have matured, one well knows the skillful means, and one has uninterrupted cultivation but has not yet grown familiar through practice, one's own task to be done is still not accomplished. If the faculties are accomplished, one well knows the skillful means, one has uninterrupted cultivation, and one has grown familiar through practice, then every matter to be brought about can be accomplished, swift penetrating knowledge can be attained, and one's own task to be done is accomplished.

5. The Four Māras and the Deeds of Māra

It should be known that the māras are, in brief, of four kinds, and the deeds done by Māra are of measureless kinds; the yoga practitioner who cultivates contemplative practice should well and thoroughly know them, and should rightly keep apart from them.  The four māras: first, the aggregate-māra (the five appropriating aggregates); second, the affliction-māra (all the afflictions of the three realms); third, the death-māra (the untimely dying and perishing of sentient beings from this or that community of sentient beings); fourth, the deva-māra (toward those who diligently cultivate the surpassing wholesome and seek to transcend the three māras of the aggregates, the afflictions, and death, there is the god born in the highest heaven of the desire-realm, attaining great sovereignty, who makes obstruction for them and sets in motion all sorts of disturbing enterprises).  These four māras are established by four senses: in dependence on the "basis of death" (only when the present five appropriating aggregates have arisen is there death), on the "ability to cause death" (by the afflictions one draws on future birth, and once born there is dying), on "being death itself" (the exhaustion and cessation of the life-faculty, the dying — this is the intrinsic nature of death), and on "making obstruction to death" (when one who diligently cultivates the transcending of death is in the very midst of the right preparatory effort, the deva Māra, attaining great sovereignty, is able to make obstruction, keeping one from being able to escape the dharma of death, or letting one transcend it only after a long time and with extreme difficulty). Again, Māra may, with regard to a person, either temporarily not attain sovereignty (the ordinary being free of desire by the mundane path, whether here or born there) or attain great sovereignty (over one not yet free of desire, in Māra's hand doing as desire wills; and one free of desire by the mundane path is still bound by Māra, has not yet slipped Māra's snare, for he must return to be born in this realm again).

What are the deeds of Māra?  As soon as some wholesome zeal able to lead to going forth arises, one, by the force of clinging to the desires, straightway retreats and casts it aside — this is a deed of Māra.  Having settled into guarding closely the gates of the faculties, one, toward lovable forms, sounds, smells, tastes, tangibles, and dharmas, by grasping at their marks and grasping at their attendant fineness, delights the mind and goes toward them — this is a deed of Māra.  Having settled into knowing the measure in food, one, toward delicious flavors and unbalanced food, by greed and craving, delights the mind and goes toward them — this is a deed of Māra.  Having settled into diligently cultivating the yoga of wakefulness in the first and last watches of the night, one, toward the pleasure of sleep, the pleasure of lying down, the pleasure of lying on one's side, by the force of indolence, delights the mind and goes toward them — this is a deed of Māra.  Having settled into abiding with right knowing, one, at the time of going and coming and other tasks, on seeing a young woman in the bloom of years, of comely form, and the like, by grasping unreasoningly at her marks and fineness, delights the mind and goes toward them; or, on seeing the various fine and lovely things of the world, or amid many affairs and much to be done, or on seeing householders and those gone forth mingling in merriment together, or on seeing evil friends dwelling together, straightway gives rise to rejoicing and delights the mind and goes toward them — all of these are deeds of Māra.  If, toward the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Saṅgha, toward suffering, its origin, its cessation, and the path, toward this world and the other world, one gives rise to doubt — all of these are deeds of Māra.  When abiding in a forest hermitage, beneath a tree, in a charnel ground, or in an empty and quiet dwelling, if one sees vast and terrifying things and is frightened, the hairs standing on end; or sees the form of an ascetic or brahmin, or the form of a human or non-human, suddenly coming, and, unreasoningly, urging one to cast off the bright class and to take up the dark class — all of these are deeds of Māra.  If toward gain, reverence, and praise one delights the mind and goes toward them; or if toward miserliness, vast craving, not knowing contentment, wrath, resentment, concealment, vexation, and deceit — "the dharmas counteracted by the ascetic's adornment" — one delights the mind and goes toward them — all of these are deeds of Māra.  Such classes as these, the measureless and boundless enterprises of Māra, are all done by the four māras; each according to what is fitting should be rightly known.

6. Setting Out to Empty and Fruitless Result — the Three Reasons for Laboring in Vain

By three causes and conditions, one who rightly cultivates, though he diligently sets out, yet accomplishes nothing. Which three? First, the faculties are not yet gathered and accumulated; second, the instruction does not accord; third, the power of meditative stability is weak and feeble.  If the faculties are not yet gathered and accumulated, then even though one obtains accordant instruction and strong meditative stability, diligently setting out is still empty and fruitless;  If the faculties are already gathered and accumulated and the power of meditative stability is also strong, yet one does not obtain accordant instruction, diligently setting out is still empty and fruitless;  If the faculties are already gathered and accumulated and one also obtains accordant instruction, yet the power of meditative stability is not strong, diligently setting out is still empty and fruitless.  If the faculties are already gathered and accumulated, the instruction accords, and the meditative stability is strong, then diligently setting out definitely has its fruit. This is called "empty and fruitless by three causes and conditions; definitely fruitful by three causes and conditions."

〔Here the Second Yoga-Station is concluded.〕

聲聞地 · 第三瑜伽處 · 前行The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · Third Yoga-Station · The Preliminaries

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

第三瑜伽處的開端:怎麼起修。先標全處八科的總攝頌,再正說起修的前方便——往詣師長請問(往慶問)、師驗其願與種姓根行(尋求)、安立五處、護養定的資糧、遠離。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

開卷·全處總攝頌

這是《本地分》〈聲聞地〉第十三的第三瑜伽處第一部分。

前面已說了補特伽羅的品類、建立、所緣等,乃至「趣修有果、無果」(第二瑜伽處)。如何安立修行,我今當說。 總攝頌(嗢柁南)說:   往慶問、尋求、方安立;護養、
  出離、一境性、障淨、修作意。
〔這八個——往慶問·尋求·安立·護養·出離(遠離)·一境性·障淨·修作意——就是第三瑜伽處的全綱。〕

一、往慶問——往詣師長、慶慰、稱揚

若有自愛的補特伽羅、初修業者,剛起修時,為了證得自己的義利,先應於四處安住正念,然後往詣通達瑜伽的軌範師(阿闍黎)、親教師(和尚)、或其餘尊重、似尊重之處。哪四處?一、專求領悟,存「無難詰」之心;二、深生恭敬,存「無憍慢」之心;三、唯求勝善,存「非顯己能」之心;四、純為安立自他善根,存「非求利養恭敬名聞」之心。

如此帶著正念到了師處,先請求開許、問清可請教的時分,然後安詳地躬身請問。請問時,偏袒左肩、右膝著地,或居下座、曲躬而坐,合掌恭敬、深生愧畏,低顏軟語地請問瑜伽:「我於這瑜伽行中想求受學,唯願慈悲,為我宣說。」

如此請問了,通達瑜伽的師長,為安立初修業者的瑜伽作意,便以慈愍柔軟的言詞讚勵慶慰,又稱揚「修斷」的功德,讚歎說:「善哉!善哉!賢首——  你竟能在『墮放逸、樂著放逸、沈沒境界、樂著境界』的眾生裡,獨自不放逸、樂修出離之行;  你竟能在『久墮種種憂苦險惡牢獄』的眾生裡,獨求解脫這牢獄;  你竟能在『被貪瞋癡等杻械枷鎖常所固縛』的眾生裡,獨求斷壞這固縛;  你竟能在『入生死曠野險道』的眾生裡,獨求超度這曠野險道;  你竟能在『遭逢善根窮儉』的眾生裡,獨求獲得豐饒善根;  你竟能在『墮種種煩惱怨賊、廣大怖畏』的眾生裡,獨求證得究竟安隱、常樂涅槃;  你竟能在『被煩惱重病吞食』的眾生裡,獨求證得第一無病、常樂涅槃;  你竟能在『被四種瀑流漂溺』的眾生裡,獨求越度這瀑流;  你竟能在『入廣大無明黑闇』的眾生裡,獨求獲得大智光明。  長老當知:你若真能如此精勤修瑜伽行,才名為『不虛受用國人的信施』、真實奉行如來聖教、不捨靜慮、成就勝觀、增長樂居空閑的法侶、精勤修學自利的瑜伽,不辱有智的同梵行者。你今是為勤修自利利他的正行,為利益安樂無量眾生、哀愍世間及諸天人阿素洛等、令其獲得義利安樂,才來請問。」

以這樣的柔軟言詞讚勵慶慰、稱揚修斷功德之後,師長再就「四種審問處」審問他,告言:「長老!你已一向歸依佛法僧、而非外道師及其邪法弟子眾嗎?你已最初淨修梵行、善淨尸羅、具正直見嗎?你已對總標、別辯的諸聖諦法,或少或多,聞受持嗎?你已對涅槃深心信解、為證寂滅而出家嗎?」

二、尋求——驗其願、種姓、根、行

如此問已,他若答「是」,師長接著要於「四種處所」、以「四種因緣」正加尋求。 什麼叫四種處所? 所要尋求的四件事是:第一尋求其願,第二尋求種姓,第三尋求其根,第四尋求其行。 什麼叫四種因緣? 正加尋求的四種方法是:第一以審問而尋求,第二以言論而尋求,第三以所作〔相狀〕而尋求,第四以知他心差別智而尋求。

(一之一)什麼是以審問尋求其願? 就是這樣問——「長老!你發的是什麼正願?聲聞乘?獨覺乘?無上正等菩提乘?」他得此問,隨自己所願如實答。 (一之二)什麼是以審問尋求種姓及根行? 就是問——「長老!你能審察自己的種姓、根、行嗎?我本來是什麼種姓——聲聞乘?獨覺乘?大乘?有什麼根——鈍、中、利?有什麼行——貪行?瞋行?乃至尋思行?」他若黠慧,能自知前後差別的種姓根行、善取其相,便如問而答;若性愚鈍,不能自知、不能善取其相,便答不上來。

(二)什麼是以言論尋求種姓、根、行? 從這裡起,種姓、根、行三事改用言論驗察:  對他,師長以「顯了、合理、眾雜美妙、易解」的言詞,先說「聲聞乘相應」的言論。他聽時,身中若有聲聞種姓,便對此言論發最極踴躍歡喜、深生信解;若是獨覺種姓、大乘種姓,則不歡喜、不信解。次說「獨覺乘相應」言論——獨覺種姓者踴躍歡喜信解,餘二則否。後說「大乘相應」言論——大乘種姓者踴躍歡喜信解,餘二則否。  驗根:若鈍根,雖聞淺顯言論,也要勵力審思才能領受通達;若利根,雖聞深細言論,也能速領受通達;中根則居中。  驗行:若貪行,聞為說「淨妙」言論,便發最極淨信愛樂、悟入其趣,身毛皆豎、悲涕墮淚,外現潤滑相、內懷柔軟怡悅;若瞋行,與上全相反;若癡行,聞為說「決定通達涅槃、離染相應」言論,便生最極驚恐怖畏(如鈍根,癡行亦爾);若慢行,聞說正法言論,不甚恭敬屬耳、不安住求解奉行之心,雖以方便引發、令受正化,也不分明發言稱善;若尋思行,聞說正法言論,雖攝耳聽而心散亂、惡受所受,所領受不堅不住、隨受隨失、數數重問。如此名為以言論尋求種姓及根行。

(三)什麼是以所作尋求這三者? 如前所說聲聞種姓及貪等行的種種相狀,就是「所作」;由這相狀,隨其所應正尋求種姓、根、行。 (四)什麼是以知他心差別智尋求種姓、根、行? 若有通達瑜伽的師長已得「知他心差別智」,便由此智如實了知他的種姓、根、行。

三、安立——標五處

於四種處所、以四因緣正尋求之後,再於「五處」如應安立。哪五處?一、護養定資糧處,二、遠離處,三、心一境性處,四、障清淨處,五、修作意處。

四、護養定資糧

什麼是護養定資糧?就是若成就戒律儀者,便於此處為令不退而住於不放逸——如佛所誡、如佛所許,圓滿戒蘊的學處差別,精進修行、常無懈廢。如此既能令已證的尸羅相應學道不退,也能證得先前未證的尸羅相應殊勝學道。如說成就戒律儀,成就根律儀、於食知量、初夜後夜覺寤瑜伽、正知而住,乃至成就一切沙門莊嚴也都如此——隨所獲得的資糧所攝善法差別,皆能防護令不退失;對更殊勝的善法差別,為令速圓滿、為如所說「無增無減、平等現行」,發生樂欲、增上欣慕,恒常安住、勇猛精進。這名為護養定資糧。如此遠離順退分法、修習能順勝分法時,便樂住於遠離。

五、遠離

什麼是遠離?就是處所圓滿、威儀圓滿、遠離圓滿。

(一)處所圓滿。「處所」就是或阿練若、或林樹下、或空閑室——山谷、巖穴、稻稈積等名空閑室;大樹林中名林樹下;空逈、塚間、邊際臥坐名阿練若。所以應知,前述山谷、巖穴、稻稈積等,大樹林中,以及空逈、塚間、邊際的臥坐處,無論歸為阿練若、林樹下或空閑室,都總稱為修行的處所。處所圓滿又有五種:  一、那處所從本以來形相端嚴、眾所喜見、清淨無穢,園林池沼具足、清虛可樂,地無高下、處無毒刺、無眾多甎石瓦礫,能令見者心生清淨、樂住其中修斷加行,心悅心喜、任持於斷——是第一處所圓滿。  二、那處所晝無憒鬧、夜少音聲,也少蚊虻、風日、蛇蠍等惡毒之觸——這就是第二種處所圓滿。  三、那處所無惡師子、虎、豹、豺、狼、怨敵、盜賊、人非人等諸恐怖事,於此身意泰然、都無疑慮、安樂而住——這就是第三種處所圓滿。  四、那處所隨順身命的眾具易得,求衣服等不甚艱難、飲食支持無所匱乏——這就是第四種處所圓滿。  五、那處所有善知識攝受、有諸有智同梵行者居止,未開曉處能正開曉、已開曉處更令明淨,甚深句義以慧通達、善巧方便殷勤開示,能令智見速得清淨——這就是第五種處所圓滿。

(二)威儀圓滿。就是晝分經行、宴坐,初夜分也如此,中夜分右脇而臥,後夜分速速還起、經行宴坐。即於這圓滿臥具,依諸佛所許的大小繩床、草葉座等結加趺坐(乃至廣說)。為什麼結加趺坐?由正觀見五種因緣:一、由身收斂能速發輕安——這威儀最順生輕安;二、由此宴坐能經久時——這威儀不令身速疲倦;三、由此宴坐是不共法——外道他論皆無;四、由此宴坐形相端嚴——令他見已極生信敬;五、由此宴坐是佛佛弟子共所開許——一切賢聖同稱讚。正觀這五因緣,故應結加趺坐。  「端身正願」:什麼是端身?就是策舉其身令端直;什麼是正願?就是令其心離諂離詐、調柔正直。由策舉身令端直,心便不被惛沈睡眠所纏擾;由離諂詐,心便不被外境散動所纏擾。  「安住背念」:什麼是背念?就是與如理作意相應的念,名為背念——因為它「棄背、違逆一切黑品」;又緣定相為境的念,也名背念——因為它「棄背、除遣一切不定地所緣境」。如此名為威儀圓滿。

(三)遠離圓滿。有二種:身遠離、心遠離。身遠離=不與在家、出家眾共相雜住,獨一無侶。心遠離=遠離一切染污、無記的作意,修習一切「其性是善、能引義利」的定地作意,及定資糧的加行作意。  如此這裡,處所圓滿、威儀圓滿、身遠離、心遠離,總攝為一,名為遠離。

The opening of the Third Yoga-Station: how one sets out to cultivate. First it gives the summary verse that gathers all eight subjects of the station; then it directly expounds the preliminary means to setting out — going to the teacher and inquiring (going-and-greeting-and-inquiring), the teacher's testing of one's vow, lineage, faculties, and conduct (searching-out), the establishing of the five sites, the guarding-and-nurturing of the provisions for concentration, and seclusion. Names are kept as of old; rendered clause by clause into today's language, without adding doctrine, without citing treatises, without annotating Sanskrit; where the treatise-text compresses, what it abbreviates is supplied back in 〔brackets〕.

Opening · The Summary Verse Gathering the Whole Station

This is the first part of the Third Yoga-Station in the thirteenth division, the Śrāvaka Stage, within the Basic Section.

Already expounded above were the classifications, establishment, object, and the rest of the person, down to "setting out to cultivate, whether with fruit or without fruit" (the Second Yoga-Station). How the practice is to be established, I shall now expound.

The summary verse (uddāna) says:

  Going-and-greeting-and-inquiring, searching-out, and then establishing; guarding-and-nurturing,
  departure, one-pointedness, the purifying of obstruction, the cultivation of attention.

〔These eight — going-and-greeting-and-inquiring · searching-out · establishing · guarding-and-nurturing · departure (seclusion) · one-pointedness · the purifying of obstruction · the cultivation of attention — are the whole framework of the Third Yoga-Station.〕

One · Going-and-Greeting-and-Inquiring — Going to the Teacher, Consoling, Extolling

If there is a self-cherishing person, a beginner in cultivation, then at the very start of setting out, in order to attain his own benefit and welfare, he should first abide in right mindfulness at four sites, and then go to one who has penetrated yoga — a preceptor of conduct (ācārya), or a personal instructor (upādhyāya), or another who is honored or resembles one honored. Which four sites? First, seeking solely to comprehend, with a mind that has "no wrangling to dispute"; second, giving rise to deep reverence, with a mind that has "no conceit"; third, seeking only the surpassingly good, with a mind that is "not to display one's own ability"; fourth, purely for the establishing of the roots of good in oneself and others, with a mind that "does not seek gain, honor, or renown."

Having thus come to the teacher's place bearing right mindfulness, he first requests permission, asks about the proper time when he may inquire, and then, composedly, bends his body and makes his inquiry. When inquiring, he bares his left shoulder, sets his right knee to the ground, or sits on a lower seat with body bent forward, joins his palms in reverence, gives rise to deep humility and awe, and, with lowered face and gentle words, inquires about yoga: "In this practice of yoga I wish to seek instruction; may you, out of compassion, expound it for me."

Having thus inquired, the teacher who has penetrated yoga, in order to establish the beginner's yogic attention, then with compassionate and gentle words rouses, encourages, consoles, and further extols the merit of "cultivation-and-severance," praising him and saying: "Excellent! Excellent, worthy one! —

 You alone, among beings who fall into heedlessness, delight in heedlessness, sink in objects, and delight in objects, are unheedful and delight in cultivating the conduct of departure;  You alone, among beings long fallen into the various perilous dungeons of grief and suffering, seek liberation from this dungeon;  You alone, among beings constantly bound fast by the fetters, manacles, cangue, and chains of craving, hatred, delusion, and the rest, seek to break this binding;  You alone, among beings who have entered the perilous road of the wilderness of birth-and-death, seek to cross beyond this perilous road of the wilderness;  You alone, among beings who meet with a famine of the roots of good, seek to gain rich and abundant roots of good;  You alone, among beings who fall into the manifold robber-foes of affliction, into vast dread, seek to attain the ultimate ease and security, the ever-blissful nirvāṇa;  You alone, among beings devoured by the grievous illness of affliction, seek to attain the foremost illness-free, ever-blissful nirvāṇa;  You alone, among beings drowned in the four kinds of torrent, seek to cross over this torrent;  You alone, among beings who have entered the vast darkness of ignorance (avidyā), seek to gain the light of great wisdom.  Elder, you should know: if you can indeed thus diligently cultivate the practice of yoga, only then are you named one who 'does not use the faith-offerings of the people of the land in vain,' one who truly upholds the sacred teaching of the Tathāgata, does not forsake meditative absorption, accomplishes surpassing insight, increases the company of dharma-companions who delight in dwelling in solitude, and diligently cultivates and trains in the yoga of one's own benefit, not shaming the wise co-practitioners of the holy life. You now, for the sake of diligently cultivating the right practice of benefiting self and others, for the sake of benefiting and gladdening measureless beings, out of compassion for the world and the gods, humans, asuras, and the rest, that they may gain benefit, welfare, and gladness — you have come to inquire."

Having with such gentle words roused, encouraged, and consoled him, and extolled the merits of cultivation-and-severance, the teacher then, at the "four sites of examining inquiry," examines and inquires of him, saying: "Elder! Have you already, single-mindedly, taken refuge in the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Saṅgha, and not in an outsider teacher and the disciple-throng of his false dharma? Have you already, at the first, purely cultivated the holy life, well purified your moral discipline (śīla), and possess an upright view? Have you, with respect to the noble-truth teachings, both in general statement and in particular exposition, whether little or much, heard, received, and retained them? Do you, toward nirvāṇa, have deep-hearted faith and understanding, and did you go forth in order to realize [that] quiescence?"

Two · Searching-Out — Testing His Vow, Lineage, Faculties, and Conduct

Having thus inquired, if he answers "Yes," the teacher then, at "four sites," by "four means," is to search him out rightly.

What are the four sites? The four matters to be searched out are: first, his vow; second, his lineage; third, his faculties; fourth, his conduct. What are the four means? The four methods of searching out rightly are: first, examining inquiry; second, discourse; third, what he does 〔his marks and manner〕; fourth, the knowledge that discerns the differences in another's mind.

(1a) What is searching out his vow by examining inquiry? He asks thus — "Elder! What right vow have you set forth? The śrāvaka vehicle? The pratyekabuddha vehicle? The vehicle of unsurpassed perfect awakening?" Receiving this inquiry, he answers truthfully according to his own vow. (1b) What is searching out his lineage, faculties, and conduct by examining inquiry? He asks — "Elder! Can you examine your own lineage, faculties, and conduct? What lineage am I by origin — the śrāvaka vehicle? the pratyekabuddha vehicle? the Great Vehicle? What faculties do I have — dull, middling, or sharp? What conduct do I have — the conduct of craving? of hatred? on down to the conduct of discursive thought?" If he is astute, able to know for himself the differences of lineage, faculties, and conduct in their before-and-after, and to grasp their marks well, he answers as inquired; if his nature is dull, unable to know for himself, unable to grasp their marks well, then he cannot answer.

(2) What is searching out lineage, faculties, and conduct by discourse? From here, these three matters are tested by discourse:  To him the teacher, with words that are "clear, in accord with reason, richly varied and finely fair, and easy to understand," first speaks a discourse "corresponding to the śrāvaka vehicle." As he listens, if within him there is the śrāvaka lineage, he gives rise, at this discourse, to the utmost leaping joy and deep faith and understanding; if he is of the pratyekabuddha lineage or the Great-Vehicle lineage, he neither rejoices nor understands. Next the teacher speaks a discourse "corresponding to the pratyekabuddha vehicle" — one of the pratyekabuddha lineage leaps up in joy and understanding, the other two do not. Last he speaks a discourse "corresponding to the Great Vehicle" — one of the Great-Vehicle lineage leaps up in joy and understanding, the other two do not.  Testing the faculties: if he is of dull faculties, then even hearing a shallow and plain discourse, he must strain to examine and reflect before he can receive and penetrate it; if he is of sharp faculties, then even hearing a deep and subtle discourse, he can swiftly receive and penetrate it; the middling faculties stand in between.  Testing the conduct: if he is of the conduct of craving, then hearing a discourse spoken on "the pure and sublime," he gives rise to the utmost pure faith and loving delight, and enters into its meaning; his body-hairs all stand erect, he weeps tears of moving sorrow, outwardly showing a glossy and smooth aspect, inwardly harboring gentleness and glad contentment. If he is of the conduct of hatred, it is wholly the reverse of the above. If he is of the conduct of delusion, then hearing a discourse spoken on "the definite penetration of nirvāṇa, corresponding to freedom from defilement," he gives rise to the utmost fright and dread (as with dull faculties, so too with the conduct of delusion). If he is of the conduct of conceit, then hearing a discourse spoken on the right Dharma, he does not very reverently lend his ear, does not settle in a mind that seeks to understand and to uphold-and-practice; though by skillful means one draws him on and makes him receive the right transforming teaching, he does not clearly voice his approval. If he is of the conduct of discursive thought, then hearing a discourse spoken on the right Dharma, though he lends his ear to listen, his mind is scattered, poorly receiving what is received; whatever he takes in is not firm and does not abide — received, it is lost; received, it is lost — and again and again he asks anew. This is named searching out lineage, faculties, and conduct by discourse.

(3) What is searching out these three by what he does? The various marks and manner, as stated above, of the śrāvaka lineage and of the conduct of craving and the rest — these are "what he does"; by these marks, one searches out lineage, faculties, and conduct rightly, each according to what fits. (4) What is searching out lineage, faculties, and conduct by the knowledge that discerns the differences in another's mind? If there is a teacher who has penetrated yoga and has attained "the knowledge that discerns the differences in another's mind," then by this knowledge he knows truly, as it is, the other's lineage, faculties, and conduct.

Three · Establishing — Setting Out the Five Sites

Having searched him out rightly at the four sites by the four means, [the teacher] then establishes [him] at "five sites," each as fits. Which five sites? First, the site of guarding-and-nurturing the provisions for concentration; second, the site of seclusion; third, the site of the one-pointedness of mind; fourth, the site of the purifying of obstruction; fifth, the site of the cultivation of attention.

Four · Guarding-and-Nurturing the Provisions for Concentration

What is guarding-and-nurturing the provisions for concentration? It is that one who has accomplished the discipline of the moral code, right here, in order not to fall back, abides in heedfulness — as the Buddha has enjoined, as the Buddha has permitted, [fulfilling] the differentiated points of training of the whole body of moral discipline, cultivating with diligence, ever without slackening or ceasing. In this way he can keep the śīla-corresponding path of training he has already realized from falling back, and can also realize the surpassing śīla-corresponding path of training not previously realized. As is said of accomplishing the discipline of the moral code, so also with accomplishing the discipline of the faculties, knowing the right measure in food, the yoga of wakefulness in the first and last watches of the night, and abiding with right awareness, on down to accomplishing all the adornments of the śramaṇa — with respect to the differentiated wholesome dharmas subsumed under whatever provisions have been gained, he can guard them all so that they do not fall back and are not lost; and with respect to the more surpassing differentiated wholesome dharmas, in order to fulfill them swiftly, and in order that, as has been said, they may "operate evenly, with no increase and no decrease," he gives rise to joyful aspiration and heightened yearning, ever-abiding, valiant and diligent. This is named guarding-and-nurturing the provisions for concentration. Thus, when he secludes himself from the dharmas that conduce to falling back, and cultivates the dharmas that can conduce to the surpassing portion, he delights to dwell in seclusion.

Five · Seclusion

What is seclusion? It is fullness of place, fullness of deportment, and fullness of seclusion.

(1) Fullness of place. "Place" means an āraṇya, or the foot of a forest tree, or an empty and quiet room — mountain valleys, rock caverns, heaps of rice-straw, and the like are named "empty and quiet room"; within a great grove of trees is named "the foot of a forest tree"; open expanses, among tombs, and lying-and-sitting at the margins are named "āraṇya." Thus, it should be known that the mountain valleys, rock caverns, heaps of rice-straw, great groves of trees, open expanses, tombs, and marginal lying-and-sitting places just stated — whether classed as an āraṇya, the foot of a forest tree, or an empty and quiet room — are all together named places of practice. Fullness of place is again of five kinds:  First, that place is from the outset comely in form and appearance, delightful to the gaze of the many, pure and unsullied; provided with groves and pools, clear, open, and pleasant; the ground without high and low, the site without poisonous thorns, without many bricks, stones, tiles, or shards — able to make the one who sees it give rise to a mind of purity, to delight to dwell therein and to cultivate the preliminaries of severance, glad and joyful in mind, sustaining severance — this is the first fullness of place.  Second, that place is by day without clamor and confusion, by night with little sound, and also with little of the evil, poisonous touch of mosquitoes, gadflies, wind and sun, snakes, and scorpions — this is the second fullness of place.  Third, that place is without the frightful things of evil lions, tigers, leopards, jackals, wolves, foes, robbers, humans and non-humans, and the rest; therein, body and mind are at ease, wholly without misgiving, dwelling in ease and joy — this is the third fullness of place.  Fourth, that place is where the requisites conducive to body and life are easily obtained, where seeking robes and the like is not overly hard, and where food and drink to sustain one are not wanting — this is the fourth fullness of place.  Fifth, that place has good spiritual friends who take one in, and wise co-practitioners of the holy life who dwell there; where what is not yet made clear can be rightly made clear, and what is already made clear is made yet more lucid; where the deep import of the words is penetrated by wisdom, and by skillful means earnestly set forth, able to make knowledge and vision swiftly attain purity — this is the fifth fullness of place.

(2) Fullness of deportment. It is that by day one does walking meditation and seated meditation, in the first watch of the night likewise, in the middle watch lies down on the right side, and in the last watch quickly rises again to walking and seated meditation. Upon just such full bedding — the large and small rope-cots, the seats of grass and leaves, that the buddhas have permitted — one sits cross-legged (and so on at length). For what reason does one sit cross-legged? Because one rightly discerns five reasons: first, by drawing the body in, pliancy is swiftly aroused — this deportment is foremost in conducing to the arising of pliancy; second, by this seated meditation one can endure for a long while — this deportment does not let the body tire swiftly; third, this seated meditation is an uncommon dharma — outsiders and their treatises have none of it; fourth, this seated meditation is comely in form and appearance — making others, on seeing it, give rise to the utmost faith and reverence; fifth, this seated meditation is what buddha after buddha and their disciples alike have permitted — all the noble ones alike praise it. Rightly discerning these five reasons, one should therefore sit cross-legged.  "Straightening the body and rightening the vow": what is straightening the body? It is rousing and raising the body to make it straight and erect. What is rightening the vow? It is making the mind free of flattery and free of deceit, pliant, upright, and straight. By rousing and raising the body to make it straight and erect, the mind is not entangled and troubled by torpor and drowsiness; by being free of flattery and deceit, the mind is not entangled and troubled by the scattering stir of outer objects.  "Abiding in turned-back mindfulness": what is turned-back mindfulness? The mindfulness that corresponds to attention in accord with principle is named turned-back mindfulness — because it "turns its back on and runs counter to all the black class [of dharmas]"; and the mindfulness that takes the mark of concentration as its object is also named turned-back mindfulness — because it "turns its back on and dispels all the objects belonging to the non-concentrated ground." This is named fullness of deportment.

(3) Fullness of seclusion. It is of two kinds: bodily seclusion and mental seclusion. Bodily seclusion = not dwelling mingled together with the throngs of householders and those gone forth, alone and without companion. Mental seclusion = secluding oneself from all defiled and neutral attention, and cultivating all the attention of the concentrated ground "whose nature is wholesome and can draw forth benefit and welfare," together with the preliminary attention that is the provisions for concentration.  Thus here, fullness of place, fullness of deportment, bodily seclusion, and mental seclusion, gathered together as one, are named seclusion.

聲聞地 · 第三瑜伽處 · 止觀自性 · 九種心住The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · Third Yoga-Station · Tranquillity-and-Insight · The Nine Mental Abidings

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

安立五處的第三「心一境性」,從這裡正式開講。先界定心一境性,再分奢摩他(止)、毘鉢舍那(觀)兩品:止有九種心住、六種力、四種作意;觀有四種毘鉢舍那、三門、六事差別所緣,末了把六事所緣一一施於不淨、慈愍、緣起、界差別、阿那波那念五種淨行所緣。逐句依玄奘譯本今語,名相留舊,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

心一境性·同分所緣

什麼是心一境性?就是一次又一次地隨念同一類所緣(同分所緣),心相續地流注、與「無罪適悅」相應,令心相續不斷,這名為三摩地,也名為善的心一境性。

什麼叫「數數隨念」?就是對正法聽聞、受持,又從師長獲得教誡教授,由這增上力,令定地的種種相現前;緣這些相為境,流注、與無罪適悅相應,所有的正念隨之而轉、安住下來。什麼叫「同分所緣」?就是諸定地的所緣境界,不是一種、而是眾多種種品類;緣這些為境、令心正行,名為定,這就名為同分所緣。

問:這所緣境是「誰的同分」,而說為同分?

答:是「所知事」相似的品類,所以名同分。又因為那念,於所緣境無散亂、無缺、無間而行——無間又殷重地加行、與適悅相應而轉,所以名「流注適悅相應」;又因為那念,於所緣境沒有染污、極安隱地住、與熟道(純熟之道)的適悅相應而轉,所以名「無罪適悅相應」。所以才說:數數隨念同分所緣、流注無罪適悅相應、令心相續,名三摩地,也名善心一境性。

這樣的心一境性,或屬奢摩他品、或屬毘鉢舍那品:若在九種心住中的心一境性,名奢摩他品;若在四種慧行中的心一境性,名毘鉢舍那品。

九種心住:把心繫住的九個階位

什麼是九種心住?就是有比丘令心——內住、等住、安住、近住、調順、寂靜、最極寂靜、專注一趣、以及等持——這樣名為九種心住。

  • 什麼是內住? 把心從外面一切所緣境界收攝回來,繫在內裡,令它不散亂。這是最初繫縛其心、令住於內、不向外散,所以名內住。
  • 什麼是等住? 最初所繫的心,性還麁動,未能令它平等地住、遍滿地住;於是就在這所緣境界上,用「相續」的方便、「澄淨」的方便,把它挫得微細、遍攝令住,所以名等住。
  • 什麼是安住? 這心雖已內住、等住,但若由失念又向外散亂,便再收攝回來、安置於內境,所以名安住。
  • 什麼是近住? 他先要這樣那樣親近地修念住,由這念,一次次作意把心內住、不令此心遠住於外,所以名近住。
  • 什麼是調順? 種種相令心散亂——所謂色、聲、香、味、觸五相,以及貪、瞋、癡、男、女等相;他先要把這些相取作「過患想」,由這想的增上力,於那些相上把心折挫住、不令流散,所以名調順。
  • 什麼是寂靜? 有種種欲、恚、害等惡尋思,以及貪欲蓋等諸隨煩惱令心擾動;他先要把這些法取作過患想,由這想的增上力,於諸尋思及隨煩惱上把心止息住、不令流散,所以名寂靜。
  • 什麼是最極寂靜? 由失念故,那兩種〔惡尋思與隨煩惱〕暫一現行時,隨所生起的惡尋思及隨煩惱,能不忍受、隨即斷滅、除遣、變吐,所以名最極寂靜。
  • 什麼是專注一趣? 有加行、有功用,無缺、無間地三摩地相續而住,所以名專注一趣。
  • 什麼是等持? 由數修、數習、數多修習為因緣,得到「無加行、無功用、任運而轉」之道;由這因緣,不靠加行、不靠功用,心的三摩地任運相續、無散亂而轉,所以名等持。

六種力:靠什麼成辦九住

要知道,這當中是由六種力,才能成辦九種心住:一聽聞力、二思惟力、三憶念力、四正知力、五精進力、六串習力。

最初由聽聞、思惟二力,數聞數思的增上力,令心最初於內境住,並就在此用相續、澄淨方便等遍安住——成辦內住、等住。如是於內繫縛心已,由憶念力數數作意收攝其心、令不散亂——成辦安住、近住。從此以後,由正知力調息其心,於諸相、諸惡尋思、諸隨煩惱不令流散——成辦調順、寂靜。由精進力,那兩種暫現行時能不忍受、隨即斷滅除遣變吐——成辦最極寂靜、專注一趣。由串習力,等持圓滿。

四種作意:配九住的四種用心

就在這九種心住上,要知道又有四種作意:一力勵運轉作意、二有間缺運轉作意、三無間缺運轉作意、四無功用運轉作意。

於內住、等住中,是「力勵運轉」作意;於安住、近住、調順、寂靜、最極寂靜中,是「有間缺運轉」作意;於專注一趣中,是「無間缺運轉」作意;於等持中,是「無功用運轉」作意。要知道這四種作意,於九種心住中是奢摩他品。又這已獲內心奢摩他的人,於毘鉢舍那勤修習時,也正是由這四種作意才能修習毘鉢舍那,所以這四作意也是毘鉢舍那品。

四種毘鉢舍那:觀的四種慧行

什麼是四種毘鉢舍那?就是有比丘依止內心奢摩他,於諸法中能正思擇、最極思擇、周遍尋思、周遍伺察,名四種毘鉢舍那。

  • 什麼是能正思擇? 於淨行所緣境界、或善巧所緣境界、或淨惑所緣境界,能正思擇「盡所有性」。
  • 什麼是最極思擇? 就在那所緣境界上,最極思擇「如所有性」。
  • 什麼是周遍尋思? 就在那所緣境界上,由慧俱行的有分別作意,取其相狀,周遍地尋思。
  • 什麼是周遍伺察? 就在那所緣境界上,審諦推求,周遍地伺察。

三門毘鉢舍那

這毘鉢舍那,由「三門」與「六事差別所緣」,要知道又有多種差別。

什麼是三門毘鉢舍那?一唯隨相行、二隨尋思行、三隨伺察行。什麼是「唯隨相行」?就是於所聞所受持的法、或於教授教誡諸法,由等引地的如理作意,暫且思惟,還未思、未量、未推、未察——這名唯隨相行毘鉢舍那。若又於那法思量推察,那時名隨尋思行毘鉢舍那。若又於那法既已推察、就所安立的再審觀察,這名隨伺察行毘鉢舍那。這名三門毘鉢舍那。

六事差別所緣:尋思六事+三覺

什麼是六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?就是在尋思之時,把六件事逐一加以尋思:第一件是語義,第二件是內外事,第三件是諸法之相,第四件是黑白品類,第五件是過去未來現在三時,第六件是四種道理。把這六事逐項尋思過後,還要再對所尋思的內容審諦推求、周遍伺察。

  • 什麼是尋思於義? 正尋思「如是如是的語,有如是如是的義」。
  • 什麼是尋思於事? 正尋思內、外二事。
  • 什麼是尋思於相? 正尋思諸法二相——自相、共相。
  • 什麼是尋思於品? 正尋思諸法二品——黑品、白品;尋思黑品的過失過患,尋思白品的功德勝利。
  • 什麼是尋思於時? 正尋思過去、未來、現在三時——這事曾在過去世、當在未來世、今在現在世。
  • 什麼是尋思於理? 正尋思四種道理。一觀待道理:尋思世俗為世俗、勝義為勝義、因緣為因緣。二作用道理:尋思諸法所有作用——如是法有如是作用。三證成道理:尋思三量——至教量、比度量、現證量,即正尋思此義有沒有至教?是否現證可得?是否應比度?四法爾道理:於如實諸法成立的法性、難思法性、安住法性,應生信解,不應思議、不應分別。

這六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那,連同前面的三門毘鉢舍那,總攝一切毘鉢舍那。

問:什麼緣故,建立這六事差別毘鉢舍那?

答:依「三覺」而建立。哪三覺?一語義覺、二事邊際覺、三如實覺。尋思「義」故,起語義覺;尋思「事」及「自相」故,起事邊際覺;尋思「共相、品、時、理」故,起如實覺。修瑜伽師所知的境界唯有這麼多——所謂語義,以及所知事的盡所有性、如所有性。

六事所緣施於五淨行(一)不淨觀

什麼是勤修不淨觀者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?

尋思義:依不淨增上的正法聽聞受持的增上力,由等引地的如理作意,解了其義——知道這不淨實在是不淨,深可厭逆,其性朽穢、惡臭、生臭;由這種種行相,於先前所聞依諸不淨所說的正法,解了其義。

尋思彼事:解了義後,觀不淨物,建立二分——內、外。

尋思自相:先於內身所有穢朽不淨發起勝解,了知身中有髮、毛等,廣說乃至腦膜、小便;又把身中這許多不淨物攝為二界——地界、水界:從髮、毛乃至大便起地界勝解,從淚、污乃至小便起水界勝解。這是依內不淨尋思自相。  再於外的諸不淨物,由青瘀等種種行相發起勝解:所觀的死屍,或男或女或非男女,或親或怨或中庸,或劣或中或勝,或少年中年老年。取彼相已——若死經一日、血流已盡、未至膿爛,發起青瘀勝解;死經二日、已至膿爛、未生蟲蛆,發起膿爛勝解;死經七日、已生蟲蛆、身體已壞,發起爛壞、胮脹勝解;若為狐狼、鵄梟、鵰鷲、烏鵲、餓狗所食噉,發起食噉勝解;既被食已、皮肉血盡、唯筋纏骨,發起異赤勝解;或被食噉、支節分離、散在處處(或有肉、或無肉、或餘少肉),發起分散勝解;若骨節分散,手骨、足骨、膝骨、髀骨、髖骨、髆骨、臂骨、脊骨、頷輪、齒鬘、髑髏各在異處,起勝解;若思惟骸骨相連而不分散、只取麁相、不細取支節屈曲,這時起勝解;若細取支節屈曲,這時起骨鎖勝解。  又有二鎖:一形骸鎖(從血鑊脊骨乃至髑髏所住)、二支節鎖(臂髆等骨連鎖、髀膞等骨連鎖);形骸鎖名為「鎖」,支節鎖名為「骨鎖」。又有二種取骨鎖相:一取假名(綵畫、木、石、泥等所作的骨鎖相)、二取真實骨鎖相——思惟假名骨鎖相時只名起「鎖」勝解、不名骨鎖,思惟真實骨鎖相時才名起「骨鎖」勝解。  又這外造色的色相有三種變壞:一自然變壞(從青瘀乃至胮脹)、二他所變壞(從食噉乃至分散)、三俱品變壞(若骨、若鎖、及骨鎖)。能這樣如實了知外不淨相,名尋思外諸所有不淨自相。

尋思共相:內身的外淨色相還未變壞、外身的不淨色相已變壞;由內身不淨色相的「平等法性、相似法性」發起勝解,能自了知「我的淨色相也有同它一樣的法性;若諸有情成就這樣淨色相者,他的淨色相也有同它一樣的法性,譬如外面的不淨色相」。這名尋思不淨共相。

尋思彼品:作這樣思——我若於那諸淨色相的不淨法性不如實知,於內於外諸淨色相發起貪欲,便是顛倒、屬黑品,是有諍法,有苦、有害、有諸災患、有遍燒惱,由此因緣發起當來生老病死愁歎憂苦種種擾惱;我若於那諸淨色相的不淨法性如實隨觀,便無顛倒、屬白品,是無諍法,無苦無害,廣說乃至能滅當來生老病死乃至擾惱。諸黑品我今不應忍受、應斷應遣;諸白品我今未生應生、生已令住增長廣大。這名尋思彼品。

尋思彼時:作這樣思——內所有諸淨色相在現在世、外所有不淨色相也在現在世;過去世曾淨的色相,過去雖有淨相、如今現在已是種種不淨;現在世我所有似淨的色相,現在雖有淨相、到未來世必不會「不變不淨」如今現在的外不淨色,那是不可能的。我這色身,過去未來現在,曾如是相、當如是相、現如是相,不過如是不淨法性。這名尋思彼時。

尋思彼理:作這樣思——若內若外都無有「我、有情」可得、可說為淨或不淨,唯有色相、唯有身形,於中假想施設言論說之為淨或不淨。又如所說:壽、煖與識,棄捨身時,便離執持而臥,無所思如木;既死沒已,漸次變壞分位可知(青瘀等乃至骨鎖)。今我這身,是先業煩惱所引發、父母不淨和合所生、糜飯等食所增長;由此因、此緣、此由藉,雖暫時有似可了知的淨色相,而內身中若內若外,於常常時種種不淨皆悉充滿。這名依世俗、勝義及因緣的觀待道理尋思彼理。  又作這樣思——於此不淨若能善修、善習、善多修習,能斷欲貪;這欲貪定應當斷。這名依作用道理尋思彼理。  又作這樣思——如世尊說「若於不淨善修善習善多修習能斷欲貪」,是至教量;我也於內自能現見諸不淨,如如作意思惟修習、便如是令欲貪纏未生不生、生已除遣,是現證量;比度量法也有可得——作這樣思「云何今者作意思惟能對治法,可於能治所緣境界煩惱當生?」這名依證成道理尋思彼理。  又作這樣思——這樣的法成立法性、難思法性、安住法性,謂修不淨能與欲貪作斷的對治,不應思議、不應分別、唯應信解。這名依法爾道理尋思彼理。

這名勤修不淨觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。

六事所緣施於五淨行(二)慈愍觀

什麼是勤修慈愍觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?

尋思義:依慈愍增上的正法聽聞受持增上力,由「欲利益安樂」的意樂,於諸有情作意與樂、發起勝解,這是慈愍相;能這樣解了其義,名於諸慈愍尋思其義。

尋思事:解了義已,能思擇此為親品、此為怨品、此中庸品;這一切品都是他人相續所攝,於中發起「外事勝解」;又親品名為內事,怨、中庸品名為外事。這名於諸慈愍尋思其事。

尋思自相:思擇這三品若是「無苦無樂、欲求樂」者,願他得樂——有饒益相的名親品、不饒益相的名怨品、俱相違相的名中庸品。這三品若無苦樂欲求樂者,約有三種欲求樂心的差別:一欲求欲界諸樂、二欲求色界有喜勇悅諸樂、三欲求離喜諸樂;若於欲樂匱乏,願他皆得無罪欲樂,若於有喜、離喜諸樂有所匱乏也如此。這名尋思慈愍自相。

尋思共相:審思擇——對親、怨、中庸三品,我都當發起「相似性心、平等性心」。為什麼?我作意與親品樂不難、與中庸品樂也不甚難、與怨品樂才最難;我對怨品尚應作意願與其樂,何況親品、中庸品而不與樂?為什麼?這當中本無能罵所罵、能瞋所瞋、能弄所弄、能打所打,唯有音聲、唯有名字;又我這身隨所生起,是有色麁重四大所造,隨所住處便被這樣的觸所逼惱(略有二觸:音聲觸、及手足塊刀杖等觸),這身與觸都是無常,能作不饒益者也是無常;又一切有情皆有生老病死等法、本性是苦,我不應於本性苦的有情身上更加其苦而不與樂;又不應不與怨家作善知識、不攝一切有情以為自體;又世尊說「我不見有這樣一類有情,無始世來經歷生死、長時流轉,不曾互相做過父母、兄弟、姊妹、軌範師、親教師、或其餘尊重似尊重者」,由此因緣一切怨品無不皆是我的親品;又怨親品無有決定真實可得——親品餘時轉成怨品、怨品餘時轉成親品,所以一切無有決定。所以我今應於一切有情皆發起平等性心、平等性見,及起相似的利益意樂、安樂意樂、與樂勝解。這名尋思慈愍共相。

尋思品:審思擇——我若於那不饒益者起瞋恚,便是顛倒、屬黑品、是有諍法(廣說如前);我若不起瞋恚,便無顛倒、屬白品、是無諍法(廣說如前)。這名尋思慈愍黑品、白品。

尋思時:審思擇——過去世求欲得樂的有情,他們皆已過去,我當如何能與其樂?現在世的有情,我今願他盡未來世於一切時常受快樂。這名尋思諸慈愍時。

尋思理:審思擇——這當中都無「我及有情、或求樂者、或與樂者」,唯有諸蘊、唯有諸行,於中假想施設言論說此求樂者、此與樂者;又那諸行以業煩惱等為因緣。這名依觀待道理尋思慈愍。若於慈愍善修善習善多修習能斷瞋恚,這名依作用道理尋思慈愍。這樣的義有至教量、我內智見現轉可得、比度量法也有可得,這名依證成道理尋思慈愍。又這法成立法性、難思法性、安住法性,謂修慈愍能斷瞋恚,不應思議不應分別、應生勝解,這名依法爾道理尋思慈愍。

這名勤修慈愍觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。

〔本地分中聲聞地第十三第三瑜伽處之二〕

六事所緣施於五淨行(三)緣起觀

什麼是勤修緣起觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?

尋思義:依緣性緣起增上的正法聽聞受持增上力,能正了知「如是如是諸法生故、彼彼法生;如是如是諸法滅故、彼彼法滅」;這當中都無「自在、作者、生者、化者」能造諸法,也無「自性、士夫、中間能轉變者」轉變諸法。能了知這等義,名尋思諸緣起義。

尋思事:審思擇十二有支若內若外而起勝解。名尋思諸緣起事。

尋思自相:審思擇無明支等的「前際無知、後際無知」(如前分別緣起支中廣說)。名尋思緣起自相。

尋思共相:審思擇——這一切緣生諸行,無不皆是本無今有、有已散滅,所以前後皆是無常;皆有生老病死法故、其性是苦;不自在故、中間士夫不可得故,所以性空、無我。名尋思緣起共相。

尋思品:審思擇——我若於那無常苦空無我的諸行如實道理發生迷惑,便是顛倒、屬黑品(廣說如前);若不迷惑,便無顛倒、屬白品(廣說如前)。名尋思諸緣起品。

尋思時:審思擇——過去世所得自體無正常性、如是已住,現在世所得自體無正常性、如是今住,未來世所得自體無正常性、如是當住。名尋思諸緣起時。

尋思理:審思擇——唯有諸業及異熟果,其中「主宰」都不可得(所謂作者及受者);唯有於法假想建立——於「無明緣行乃至生緣老死」中發起假相、施設言論說為作者及受者,有如是名、如是種、如是姓、如是飲食、如是領受若苦若樂、如是長壽、如是久住、如是極於壽量邊際。又此中有二種果、二種因:二種果——一自體果(今世諸異熟生的六處等法)、二受用境界果(愛非愛業增上所起的六觸所生諸受);二種因——一牽引因、二生起因。  牽引因:於二果發起愚癡;愚癡為先,生福、非福及不動行;行能攝受後有之識、令生有芽——即能攝受識種子,令它展轉攝受後有的名色種子、六處種子、觸受種子;為令當來生支所攝的識、名色、六處、觸、受次第得生,今先攝受彼法種子。這一切名牽引因。  生起因:若領受諸無明觸所生受時,由「境界愛」生「後有愛」、及能攝受愛品癡品所有諸取;由這勢力、這功能,潤業種子,令它能與諸異熟果。這一切名生起因。  由這二因增上力,便為三苦所隨逐、招集一切純大苦蘊。這名依觀待道理尋思緣起所有道理。又審思擇於這緣性緣起觀善修善習善多修習能斷愚癡;又審思擇這道理有至教量、有內現證、有比度法、也有成立法性等義——這名依作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理尋思緣起所有道理。

這名勤修緣起觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。

六事所緣施於五淨行(四)界差別觀

什麼是勤修界差別觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?

尋思義:依界差別增上的正法聽聞受持增上力,能正解了一切界義——謂種姓義、種子義、因義、性義,是其界義。名尋思界義。

尋思事:正尋思地等六界的內外差別、發起勝解。名尋思界事。

尋思自相:正尋思——地為堅相、〔水為濕相、火為煖相、〕乃至風為輕動相,識為了別相,空界為虛空相、遍滿色相、無障礙相。名尋思諸界自相。

尋思共相:正尋思——這一切界,要言之皆是無常乃至無我。名尋思諸界共相。

尋思品:正尋思「於一合相的界差別性」——不了知者,由界差別所合成的身發起高慢,便是顛倒、屬黑品(廣說如前);與上相違,便無顛倒、屬白品(廣說如前)。名尋思界品。

尋思時:正尋思——去來今世以六界為緣、得入母胎。名尋思界時。

尋思理:正尋思——如草木等眾緣和合、圍遶虛空,數〔計〕名為舍;如是六界為所依故,筋骨血肉眾緣和合、圍遶虛空,由假想等想施設言論,數名為身;又由宿世諸業煩惱及自種子為因緣。這名依觀待道理尋思諸界差別道理。又正尋思若於界差別觀善修善習善多修習能斷憍慢;又正尋思這道理有至教量、有內證智、有比度法、有成立法性難思法性安住法性——這名依作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理尋思諸界差別道理。

這名勤修界差別觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。

六事所緣施於五淨行(五)阿那波那念

什麼是勤修阿那波那念〔入出息念〕者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?

尋思義:依入出息念增上的正法聽聞受持增上力,能正了知「於入出息所緣境界繫心了達、無忘明記」,是阿那波那念義。名尋思其義。

尋思事:正尋思——入息、出息在內可得,繫屬身故、外處攝故,有內外差別。名尋思其事。

尋思自相:正尋思——入息有二、出息有二:風入內名入息、風出外名出息;又正了知如是為長入息出息、如是為短入息出息、如是息遍一切身分。名尋思諸息自相。

尋思共相:正尋思——入息滅已有出息生、出息滅已有入息生,入出息轉繫屬命根及有識身,這入出息及所依止皆是無常。名尋思諸息共相。

尋思品:正尋思——若於入出息不住正念、為惡尋思擾亂其心,便是顛倒、屬黑品、是有諍法(廣說如前);與上相違便無顛倒、屬白品、是無諍法(廣說如前)。名尋思其品。

尋思時:正尋思——去來今世入出息轉繫屬身心、身心繫屬入出息。名尋思其時。

尋思理:正尋思——這當中都無「持入息者、持出息者」令入出息繫屬於他,唯於從因從緣所生諸行發起假想、施設言論說有能持入出息者。這名依觀待道理尋思其理。又正尋思若於入出息念善修善習善多修習能斷尋思;又正尋思這道理有至教量、有內證智、有比度法、有成立法性難思法性安住法性,不應思議不應分別唯應信解——這名依作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理尋思其理。

這名勤修阿那波那念者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。

止觀雙運·善巧淨惑後說

這樣依止淨行所緣、尋思六事差別觀已,一次次於內令心寂靜,又一次次於所尋思的、以勝觀行審諦伺察:他由奢摩他為依止故,令毘鉢舍那速得清淨;又由毘鉢舍那為依止故,令奢摩他增長廣大。至於依止善巧所緣及淨惑所緣而尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那,在其自處〔後文〕我當再說。

The third of the five things established, "one-pointedness of mind," is here formally taken up. First one-pointedness of mind is defined; then it divides into the two divisions of tranquillity (śamatha) and insight (vipaśyanā): tranquillity has the nine mental abidings, the six forces, and the four attentions; insight has the four insights, the three gateways, and the object-differentiated-by-six-matters, and at the last the object-of-six-matters is applied, one by one, to the five stilling contemplations of the impure, loving-kindness, dependent origination, the differentiation of elements, and mindfulness of in-and-out breathing. Rendered line by line in today's language from Xuanzang's translation; the technical terms are left in their old form, no doctrine is added, no treatise cited, no Sanskrit annotated; where the treatise's wording is compressed it is supplied back within 〔brackets〕.

One-Pointedness of Mind · The Object of the Same Class

What is one-pointedness of mind? It is recollecting again and again an object of one same class (an object of the same class), the mind flowing on continuously, consorting with a "blameless ease," so that the mind is kept in unbroken continuity — this is named concentration, and is also named the wholesome one-pointedness of mind.

What is called "recollecting again and again"? It is that, toward the true Dharma one has heard and retained, and having received instruction and teaching from a teacher, by this reinforcing force the various marks of the meditative stage come to appear before one; taking these marks as the object, flowing on, consorting with a blameless ease, all the right mindfulness turns along with them and abides. What is called "the object of the same class"? It is that the object-fields of the several meditative stages are not of one kind but of many various sorts and classes; to take these as the object and make the mind operate rightly is named meditation, and this is named the object of the same class.

Question: this object-field — of "what" is it the same class, that it is called of the same class?

Answer: it is a class resembling the thing-to-be-known, and so is named of the same class. Again, because that mindfulness operates upon the object-field without scattering, without lapse, without interval — operating without interval and with earnest, sustained application, and turning in consort with ease — it is therefore named "flowing on and consorting with ease"; and again, because that mindfulness operates upon the object-field without defilement, abiding in utmost security, and turning in consort with the ease of the ripened path (the path made thoroughly familiar), it is therefore named "consorting with a blameless ease." This is why it is said: recollecting again and again an object of the same class, flowing on and consorting with a blameless ease, keeping the mind in continuity, is named concentration, and is also named the wholesome one-pointedness of mind.

Such one-pointedness of mind belongs either to the tranquillity division or to the insight division: when it is the one-pointedness of mind within the nine mental abidings, it is named the tranquillity division; when it is the one-pointedness of mind within the four wisdom-practices, it is named the insight division.

The Nine Mental Abidings: The Nine Stations of Binding the Mind

What are the nine mental abidings? They are that a monk makes the mind — abide within, abide evenly, abide settled, abide close, become tamed, become stilled, become utterly stilled, become single-pointed in absorption, and become held-in-equipoise — and this is named the nine mental abidings.

  • What is inner abiding? Gathering the mind back from every outer object-field and binding it within, so that it does not scatter. This is the very first binding of the mind, making it abide within and not scatter outward, and so it is named inner abiding.
  • What is even abiding? The mind first bound is still coarse and restless in nature, not yet able to be made to abide evenly and to abide pervasively; and so, upon this object-field, by the expedient of "continuity" and the expedient of "clarifying," it is ground down fine and gathered all round into abiding, and so it is named even abiding.
  • What is settled abiding? Though this mind has already abided within and abided evenly, yet if through loss of mindfulness it scatters outward again, one gathers it back once more and sets it upon the inner object, and so it is named settled abiding.
  • What is close abiding? He must first draw near, in this way and that, and cultivate the abiding of mindfulness; by this mindfulness, attending again and again, he makes the mind abide within and does not let this mind abide far off outside, and so it is named close abiding.
  • What is taming? The various marks make the mind scatter — namely the five marks of color, sound, smell, taste, and touch, and the marks of greed, hatred, delusion, man, woman, and the like; he must first take these marks as the "thought of fault," and by the reinforcing force of this thought, upon those marks he breaks the mind down and abides, not letting it flow loose, and so it is named tamed.
  • What is stilling? There are the various evil thoughts of desire, ill-will, harm, and the like, and the several secondary afflictions such as the hindrance of covetousness, which come to disturb the mind; he must first take these dharmas as the thought of fault, and by the reinforcing force of this thought, upon the thoughts and the secondary afflictions he brings the mind to rest and abides, not letting it flow loose, and so it is named stilled.
  • What is utter stilling? Through loss of mindfulness, when those two 〔evil thoughts and secondary afflictions〕 briefly operate for a moment, whatever evil thoughts and secondary afflictions arise, he is able not to endure them, and at once severs, expels, removes, and vomits them out, and so it is named utterly stilled.
  • What is single-pointed absorption? With exertion, with effort, the meditative equipoise abides in continuity without lapse and without interval, and so it is named single-pointed absorption.
  • What is holding in equipoise? By repeated cultivation, repeated practice, and much repeated cultivation as cause and condition, one gains the path that is "without exertion, without effort, and runs on of itself"; by this cause and condition, without relying on exertion and without relying on effort, the mind's meditative equipoise continues of itself, turning without scattering, and so it is named held-in-equipoise.

The Six Forces: By What the Nine Abidings Are Accomplished

It should be known that herein it is by six forces that the nine mental abidings can be accomplished: first, the force of hearing; second, the force of reflection; third, the force of recollection; fourth, the force of full awareness; fifth, the force of vigor; sixth, the force of repeated practice.

At the first, by the two forces of hearing and reflection, by the reinforcing force of repeated hearing and repeated reflecting, one makes the mind first abide upon the inner object, and right there, by the expedients of continuity, clarifying, and the rest, makes it abide all round — accomplishing inner abiding and even abiding. Having thus bound the mind within, by the force of recollection one attends again and again, gathers the mind back, and makes it not scatter — accomplishing settled abiding and close abiding. From this point on, by the force of full awareness one regulates and stills the mind, so that upon the various marks, the various evil thoughts, and the various secondary afflictions it is not let to flow loose — accomplishing tamed and stilled. By the force of vigor, when those two briefly operate one is able not to endure them but at once to sever, expel, remove, and vomit them out — accomplishing utterly stilled and single-pointed absorption. By the force of repeated practice, holding-in-equipoise is brought to fullness.

The Four Attentions: The Four Ways of Applying the Mind That Match the Nine Abidings

Right upon these nine mental abidings, it should be known that there are again four attentions: first, the attention of striving-operation; second, the attention of interrupted-operation; third, the attention of uninterrupted-operation; fourth, the attention of effortless-operation.

Within inner abiding and even abiding, it is the attention of "striving-operation"; within settled abiding, close abiding, tamed, stilled, and utterly stilled, it is the attention of "interrupted-operation"; within single-pointed absorption, it is the attention of "uninterrupted-operation"; within holding-in-equipoise, it is the attention of "effortless-operation." It should be known that these four attentions, within the nine mental abidings, are the tranquillity division. Again, when one who has already gained inner tranquillity of mind diligently cultivates insight, it is precisely by these four attentions that he can cultivate insight, and so these four attentions are also the insight division.

The Four Insights: The Four Wisdom-Practices of Contemplation

What are the four insights? They are that a monk, resting upon inner tranquillity of mind, is able, among the several dharmas, to discern correctly, to discern utterly, to investigate thoroughly, and to examine thoroughly — this is named the four insights.

  • What is discerning correctly? Upon the object-field of the purifying practices, or the object-field of skill, or the object-field that purifies the afflictions, one is able to discern correctly the "extent-of-being."
  • What is discerning utterly? Right upon that object-field, one discerns utterly the "way-of-being."
  • What is investigating thoroughly? Right upon that object-field, by an attention that is discriminative and conjoined with wisdom, one grasps its mark and shape and investigates it thoroughly.
  • What is examining thoroughly? Right upon that object-field, one probes and searches with care, and examines it thoroughly.

The Three Gateways of Insight

This insight, by "three gateways" and by the "object-differentiated-by-six-matters," should be known to have again many differentiations.

What are the three gateways of insight? First, that which follows the mark only; second, that which follows investigation; third, that which follows examination. What is "following the mark only"? It is that, upon the dharmas one has heard and retained, or upon the dharmas of instruction and teaching, by an attention in accord with principle at the stage of equipoise, one reflects for the moment, but has not yet reflected, weighed, probed, or examined — this is named the insight that follows the mark only. If one further weighs, probes, and examines that dharma, then it is named the insight that follows investigation. If one further, having probed and examined that dharma, once more contemplates with care what has been established, this is named the insight that follows examination. This is named the three gateways of insight.

The Object-Differentiated-by-Six-Matters: Investigating the Six Matters plus the Three Cognitions

What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters? It is that, when investigating, one investigates six matters one by one: first, the meaning of the words; second, the inner and outer things; third, the marks of the dharmas; fourth, the dark and white classes; fifth, the three times of past, future, and present; and sixth, the four principles. Having investigated each of these six matters, one then probes with care and examines thoroughly what has been investigated.

  • What is investigating with regard to meaning? One correctly investigates that "such-and-such words have such-and-such meaning."
  • What is investigating with regard to thing? One correctly investigates the two things, inner and outer.
  • What is investigating with regard to mark? One correctly investigates the two marks of the several dharmas — the particular-mark and the common-mark.
  • What is investigating with regard to class? One correctly investigates the two classes of the several dharmas — the dark class and the white class; investigating the fault and disaster of the dark class, and investigating the merit and excellence of the white class.
  • What is investigating with regard to time? One correctly investigates the three times, past, future, and present — that this thing once was in the past age, will be in the future age, and now is in the present age.
  • What is investigating with regard to principle? One correctly investigates the four principles. First, the principle of reliance: investigating the conventional as conventional, the ultimate as ultimate, and cause-and-condition as cause-and-condition. Second, the principle of function: investigating the several dharmas and all their functions — such a dharma has such a function. Third, the principle of proof: investigating the three means — the means of authoritative teaching, the means of inference, and the means of direct realization; that is, correctly investigating whether this meaning has any authoritative teaching, whether it is attainable by direct realization, and whether it ought to be inferred. Fourth, the principle of the nature of things: toward the nature of things established truly, as the several dharmas truly are — the nature of things hard to conceive, the nature of things that abides — one should give rise to conviction, and should not deliberate, should not discriminate.

This insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters, together with the foregoing three gateways of insight, gathers in all insight altogether.

Question: for what reason is this insight differentiated-by-six-matters set up?

Answer: it is set up in dependence on the "three cognitions." Which three cognitions? First, the cognition of word-meaning; second, the cognition of the bounds of the thing; third, the cognition of things-as-they-are. Because one investigates "meaning," the cognition of word-meaning arises; because one investigates "thing" and "particular-mark," the cognition of the bounds of the thing arises; because one investigates "common-mark, class, time, and principle," the cognition of things-as-they-are arises. The field known to one who cultivates yoga is only this much — namely word-meaning, together with the extent-of-being and the way-of-being of the thing-to-be-known.

The Object-of-Six-Matters Applied to the Five Purifying Practices (1) The Contemplation of the Impure

What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of the impure?

Investigating meaning: in dependence on the reinforcing force of hearing and retaining the true Dharma that reinforces the impure, by an attention in accord with principle at the stage of equipoise, one understands its meaning — knowing that this impurity is truly impure, deeply to be loathed, its nature rotten and foul, malodorous, raw and rank; by these various aspects, one understands the meaning of the true Dharma formerly heard, which was spoken with reference to the several impurities.

Investigating that thing: having understood the meaning, one contemplates the impure things and sets up two divisions — inner and outer.

Investigating the particular-mark: first, toward the foul, rotten impurities within one's own inner body, one arouses resolute conviction, knowing that within the body there are hair, body-hair, and so on, spoken at length down to the membrane of the brain and the urine; and again one gathers these many impurities within the body into two elements — the earth-element and the water-element: from hair and body-hair down to feces one arouses the resolute conviction of the earth-element; from tears and sweat down to urine one arouses the resolute conviction of the water-element. This is investigating the particular-mark in dependence on the inner impurity.  Again, toward the outer impure things, by the various aspects of bruised-blue and the rest one arouses resolute conviction: the corpse one contemplates, whether man or woman or neither man nor woman, whether kin or foe or neutral, whether inferior or middling or superior, whether young, middle-aged, or old. Having grasped that mark — if the death is one day past, the blood already run dry but not yet come to festering, one arouses the resolute conviction of the bruised-blue; if the death is two days past, already come to festering but not yet grown worms and maggots, one arouses the resolute conviction of the festering; if the death is seven days past, already grown worms and maggots and the body already ruined, one arouses the resolute conviction of the rotted-and-bloated; if devoured by foxes and wolves, kites and owls, eagles and vultures, crows and magpies, and starving dogs, one arouses the resolute conviction of the devoured; once devoured, the skin, flesh, and blood exhausted, only sinews binding the bones, one arouses the resolute conviction of the discolored-red; or devoured, the limbs and joints parted and scattered here and there (some with flesh, some without flesh, some with a little flesh remaining), one arouses the resolute conviction of the scattered; if the bone-joints are parted and scattered, the hand-bones, foot-bones, knee-bones, thigh-bones, hip-bones, shoulder-bones, arm-bones, spine-bones, the ring of the jaw, the garland of teeth, and the skull each in a separate place, one arouses the resolute conviction of the bone; if one reflects that the skeleton is joined together and not scattered, grasping only the coarse mark and not grasping the bending of the limbs and joints in detail, then one arouses the resolute conviction of the chain; if one grasps the bending of the limbs and joints in detail, then one arouses the resolute conviction of the bone-chain.  Again there are two chains: first, the frame-chain (from the blood-cauldron and the spine-bones down to the seat of the skull); second, the limb-chain (the shoulder-bones and the rest linked in a chain, the thigh- and calf-bones and the rest linked in a chain); the frame-chain is named "chain," and the limb-chain is named "bone-chain." Again there are two ways of grasping the mark of a bone-chain: first, grasping the mere designation (the mark of a bone-chain made of painted work, wood, stone, clay, and the like); second, grasping the true mark of a bone-chain — when reflecting on the mark of the merely-designated bone-chain, it is only named arousing the resolute conviction of the "chain," and is not named bone-chain; when reflecting on the mark of the true bone-chain, only then is it named arousing the resolute conviction of the "bone-chain."  Again, the mark of this outer derived matter has three kinds of alteration-and-ruin: first, alteration of itself (from bruised-blue down to rotted-and-bloated); second, alteration by another (from devoured down to scattered); third, alteration of both kinds (whether bone, or chain, or bone-chain). To be able thus to know truly the mark of the outer impurity is named investigating the particular-mark of all the outer impurities.

Investigating the common-mark: the mark of the fine outer matter of the inner body has not yet altered, while the mark of the impure matter of the outer body has already altered; by the "sameness of the nature of things, the resemblance of the nature of things" of the impure matter-mark of the inner body, one arouses resolute conviction, and is able to know oneself: "the mark of my own fine matter also has the same nature of things as this; and if there are sentient beings possessed of such a mark of fine matter, the mark of their fine matter also has the same nature of things as this — like the mark of the outer impure matter." This is named investigating the common-mark of the impure.

Investigating that class: one reflects thus — if I do not truly know the impure nature of those several fine-matter marks, and arouse greed and desire toward the several fine-matter marks inner and outer, this is upside-down, belongs to the dark class, is a dharma of strife, has suffering, has harm, has all disasters and calamities, has all-round burning distress, and by this cause and condition gives rise to the various distresses of future birth, aging, sickness, death, sorrow, lament, grief, and pain; if I truly contemplate along with the impure nature of those several fine-matter marks, then I am not upside-down, belong to the white class, am a dharma without strife, without suffering and without harm, spoken at length down to being able to extinguish the future birth, aging, sickness, death, and on to the distresses. The several dark-class things I ought now not to endure, and ought to sever and expel; the several white-class things, unarisen in me, I ought to make arise, and once arisen, make abide, grow, and become vast and great. This is named investigating that class.

Investigating that time: one reflects thus — the several fine-matter marks I have within are in the present age, and the impure matter-marks I have without are also in the present age; the marks that were once fine in the past age, though they had a fine mark in the past, are now in the present already various impurities; the seemingly-fine matter-marks I have in the present age, though they have a fine mark now in the present, will by the future age certainly not remain "unaltered and pure" like the outer impure matter now present — that is impossible. This matter-body of mine, past, future, and present, once had such a mark, will have such a mark, and now has such a mark — nothing but such an impure nature of things. This is named investigating that time.

Investigating that principle: one reflects thus — whether inner or outer, no "self or sentient being" is to be found that could be called pure or impure; there is only the matter-mark, only the bodily shape, within which by conventional supposition and designation one speaks of it as pure or impure. Again, as it is said: lifespan, warmth, and consciousness, when the body is cast off, then depart from their holding-and-grasping and lie down, without thought, like wood; and once dead and gone, the successive phases of alteration-and-ruin can be known (bruised-blue and the rest down to the bone-chain). Now this body of mine is drawn forth by former karma and afflictions, born of the impure union of father and mother, and grown by the nourishment of rice-gruel and the like; by this cause, this condition, this dependence, though for a while it has a seemingly-knowable fine matter-mark, yet within the inner body, whether inner or outer, at all times the various impurities are all completely filled. This is named investigating that principle in dependence on the principle of reliance — the conventional, the ultimate, and cause-and-condition.  Again one reflects thus — if one can well cultivate, well practice, and well much-cultivate this impurity, one is able to sever desire and greed; this desire and greed most certainly ought to be severed. This is named investigating that principle in dependence on the principle of function.  Again one reflects thus — that "if one well cultivates, well practices, and well much-cultivates the impure, one is able to sever desire and greed," as the World-Honored One said, is the means of authoritative teaching; that I too, within, am able myself to see directly the several impurities, and, by attending, reflecting, and cultivating thus and thus, am able thus to make desire-and-greed's enwrapment, unarisen, not arise, and once arisen, expel it, is the means of direct realization; the means of inference too is to be had — one reflects thus, "how is it that now, by attending and reflecting on the counteracting dharma, upon the object-field that counteracts, the affliction is to arise?" This is named investigating that principle in dependence on the principle of proof.  Again one reflects thus — that this dharma is established the nature of things, the nature of things hard to conceive, the nature of things that abides — namely that cultivating the impure can serve as the severing counteragent of desire-and-greed — ought not to be deliberated, ought not to be discriminated, and ought only to be met with conviction. This is named investigating that principle in dependence on the principle of the nature of things.

This is named the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of the impure.

The Object-of-Six-Matters Applied to the Five Purifying Practices (2) The Contemplation of Loving-Kindness

What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of loving-kindness?

Investigating meaning: in dependence on the reinforcing force of hearing and retaining the true Dharma that reinforces loving-kindness, by the inclination of "wishing to benefit and bring ease," one attends to giving happiness to the several sentient beings and arouses resolute conviction — this is the mark of loving-kindness; to be able thus to understand its meaning is named investigating the meaning of the several loving-kindnesses.

Investigating thing: having understood the meaning, one is able to discern this as the friend-class, this as the foe-class, this as the neutral-class; all these classes are subsumed under the continua of others, and toward them one arouses "resolute conviction of the outer thing"; again, the friend-class is named the inner thing, and the foe- and neutral-classes are named the outer thing. This is named investigating the thing of the several loving-kindnesses.

Investigating the particular-mark: one discerns whether these three classes are "without suffering and without happiness, wishing to seek happiness," and wishes them to gain happiness — the one with a mark of benefit is named the friend-class, the one with a mark of no-benefit is named the foe-class, the one with a mark contrary to both is named the neutral-class. If these three classes are without suffering and happiness and wish to seek happiness, then as to the mind wishing to seek happiness there are three differences: first, wishing to seek the various happinesses of the desire realm; second, wishing to seek the various happinesses of the form realm that have joy and buoyant delight; third, wishing to seek the various happinesses apart from joy; if one is lacking in desire-happiness, one wishes them all to gain blameless desire-happiness, and if one is in any way lacking in the happinesses that have joy and apart from joy, likewise. This is named investigating the particular-mark of loving-kindness.

Investigating the common-mark: one considers with care and discerns — toward the three classes of friend, foe, and neutral, I should in all cases arouse a "mind of resemblance, a mind of evenness." Why? For me to attend to giving happiness to the friend-class is not hard, to give happiness to the neutral-class is also not very hard, and to give happiness to the foe-class is hardest; toward the foe-class I should still attend and wish to give it happiness — how much more the friend-class and the neutral-class, and not give them happiness? Why? For herein there is fundamentally no reviler and reviled, no angered and angerer, no mocker and mocked, no striker and struck; there is only sound, only names; and again this body of mine, arising as it does, is made of the coarse and heavy four great elements that have matter, and wherever it dwells is oppressed by such contacts (there are roughly two contacts: the contact of sound, and the contact of hand, foot, clod, blade, staff, and the like), and this body and these contacts are both impermanent, and the one who does me no benefit is also impermanent; and again all sentient beings have such dharmas as birth, aging, sickness, and death, and are by their very nature suffering — I ought not, upon the body of a sentient being by nature suffering, to add still more suffering and not give it happiness; and again I ought not to fail to be a good friend to a foe, nor to fail to gather all sentient beings as my own self; and again the World-Honored One said, "I do not see a single such kind of sentient being that, throughout the beginningless ages passing through birth-and-death, long turning in the round, has not at some time been to one another father, mother, brother, sister, preceptor, teacher, or one otherwise venerable or seemingly-venerable," and by this cause and condition every one of the foe-class is nothing but my friend-class; and again the foe- and friend-classes have nothing fixed and truly to be found — the friend-class at another time turns into the foe-class, the foe-class at another time turns into the friend-class, and so all are without fixity. Therefore I ought now, toward all sentient beings, to arouse a mind of evenness and a view of evenness, and to arouse a resembling inclination-to-benefit, inclination-to-ease, and resolute conviction of giving happiness. This is named investigating the common-mark of loving-kindness.

Investigating class: one considers with care and discerns — if I arouse anger and ill-will toward the one who does me no benefit, this is upside-down, belongs to the dark class, is a dharma of strife (spoken at length as before); if I do not arouse anger and ill-will, this is not upside-down, belongs to the white class, is a dharma without strife (spoken at length as before). This is named investigating the dark class and the white class of loving-kindness.

Investigating time: one considers with care and discerns — the sentient beings of the past age who sought and wished to gain happiness have all passed away, so how shall I be able to give them happiness? The sentient beings of the present age, I now wish that, throughout the whole future age, at all times they may constantly receive happiness. This is named investigating the times of the several loving-kindnesses.

Investigating principle: one considers with care and discerns — herein there is no "self or sentient being, no one seeking happiness, no one giving happiness"; there are only the several aggregates, only the several formations, within which by conventional supposition and designation one speaks of this one seeking happiness, this one giving happiness; and again those several formations have karma, affliction, and the rest as their cause and condition. This is named investigating loving-kindness in dependence on the principle of reliance. If, by well cultivating, well practicing, and well much-cultivating loving-kindness, one is able to sever anger and ill-will, this is named investigating loving-kindness in dependence on the principle of function. That such a meaning has the means of authoritative teaching, that my own inner knowledge-and-vision turns present and is to be had, and that the means of inference too is to be had, is named investigating loving-kindness in dependence on the principle of proof. And again, that this dharma is established the nature of things, the nature of things hard to conceive, the nature of things that abides — namely that cultivating loving-kindness can sever anger and ill-will — ought not to be deliberated, ought not to be discriminated, and ought to be met with resolute conviction, is named investigating loving-kindness in dependence on the principle of the nature of things.

This is named the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of loving-kindness.

〔Within the Basic Section, the Śrāvaka Stage, the thirteenth, the third yoga-station, part two.〕

The Object-of-Six-Matters Applied to the Five Purifying Practices (3) The Contemplation of Dependent Origination

What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of dependent origination?

Investigating meaning: in dependence on the reinforcing force of hearing and retaining the true Dharma that reinforces the conditioned nature and dependent origination, one is able to know correctly that "because such-and-such dharmas arise, such-and-such dharmas arise; because such-and-such dharmas cease, such-and-such dharmas cease"; herein there is no "sovereign lord, maker, producer, or transformer" that could fashion the several dharmas, nor any "intrinsic self, person, or intermediate transformer" that could transform the several dharmas. To be able to know such meanings is named investigating the meaning of the several dependent originations.

Investigating thing: one considers with care and discerns the twelve members of existence, whether inner or outer, and arouses resolute conviction. This is named investigating the thing of the several dependent originations.

Investigating the particular-mark: one considers with care and discerns the "ignorance (avidyā) about the prior bound, ignorance about the later bound" of the member of ignorance and the rest (spoken at length as before in the analysis of the members of dependent origination). This is named investigating the particular-mark of dependent origination.

Investigating the common-mark: one considers with care and discerns — all these conditionally-arisen formations are, without exception, non-existent before and existent now, existent and then dispersed and ceased, and so before and after they are all impermanent; because they all have the dharmas of birth, aging, sickness, and death, their nature is suffering; because they are not sovereign, and because the intermediate person is not to be found, therefore their nature is empty and without self. This is named investigating the common-mark of dependent origination.

Investigating class: one considers with care and discerns — if I, toward the true principle of those impermanent, suffering, empty, and selfless formations, give rise to confusion, this is upside-down, belongs to the dark class (spoken at length as before); if I am not confused, this is not upside-down, belongs to the white class (spoken at length as before). This is named investigating the class of the several dependent originations.

Investigating time: one considers with care and discerns — the self-body gained in the past age had no constancy of the normal, and so abided; the self-body gained in the present age has no constancy of the normal, and so now abides; the self-body to be gained in the future age will have no constancy of the normal, and so will abide. This is named investigating the time of the several dependent originations.

Investigating principle: one considers with care and discerns — there are only the several karmas and the fruits of maturation, within which no "master and controller" is to be found (namely a maker and an experiencer); there is only the conventional supposition established upon dharmas — within "ignorance conditioning formations down to birth conditioning aging-and-death" one arouses a false mark and by designation speaks of a maker and an experiencer, having such a name, such a kind, such a clan, such food and drink, experiencing such suffering or such happiness, such long life, such long abiding, and such reaching to the very bound of the lifespan. And again herein there are two kinds of fruit and two kinds of cause: the two kinds of fruit — first, the self-body fruit (the six bases and the rest, the dharmas born of maturation in this present life); second, the enjoyed-realm fruit (the several feelings born of the six contacts, arisen by the reinforcing force of agreeable and disagreeable karma); the two kinds of cause — first, the drawing-in cause; second, the giving-rise cause.  The drawing-in cause: toward the two fruits one arouses folly; with folly preceding, one produces meritorious, non-meritorious, and imperturbable formations; the formations are able to appropriate the consciousness of the later existence and make the sprouts of existence arise — that is, they are able to appropriate the seeds of consciousness and make them, turn by turn, appropriate the seeds of the name-and-form, the seeds of the six bases, and the seeds of contact-and-feeling of the later existence; in order that the consciousness, name-and-form, six bases, contact, and feeling subsumed under the future birth-member may in sequence come to arise, one now first appropriates the seeds of those dharmas. All this is named the drawing-in cause.  The giving-rise cause: when experiencing the several feelings born of the ignorance-contact, by "object-craving" one produces "craving for the later existence," and the several graspings that are able to appropriate the craving-portion and the folly-portion; by this force, this capacity, one moistens the karma-seeds and makes them able to yield the several fruits of maturation. All this is named the giving-rise cause.  By the reinforcing force of these two causes, one is then pursued by the three sufferings and gathers together the whole great mass of nothing but suffering. This is named investigating the whole principle of dependent origination in dependence on the principle of reliance. And again one considers with care and discerns that, by well cultivating, well practicing, and well much-cultivating this contemplation of the conditioned nature and dependent origination, one is able to sever folly; and again one considers with care and discerns that this principle has the means of authoritative teaching, has inner direct realization, has the dharma of inference, and also has such meanings as being established the nature of things — this is named investigating the whole principle of dependent origination in dependence on the principle of function, the principle of proof, and the principle of the nature of things.

This is named the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of dependent origination.

The Object-of-Six-Matters Applied to the Five Purifying Practices (4) The Contemplation of the Differentiation of Elements

What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of the differentiation of elements?

Investigating meaning: in dependence on the reinforcing force of hearing and retaining the true Dharma that reinforces the differentiation of elements, one is able to understand correctly the meaning of all "element" — namely the sense of lineage, the sense of seed, the sense of cause, and the sense of nature — such is the sense of "element." This is named investigating the meaning of element.

Investigating thing: one correctly investigates the inner and outer differentiation of the six elements, earth and the rest, and arouses resolute conviction. This is named investigating the thing of element.

Investigating the particular-mark: one correctly investigates — earth is the mark of hardness, 〔water is the mark of moisture, fire is the mark of warmth,〕 and on to wind being the mark of lightness-and-motion, consciousness being the mark of discerning, and the space-element being the mark of empty space, the mark of pervading matter, the mark of no obstruction. This is named investigating the particular-mark of the several elements.

Investigating the common-mark: one correctly investigates — all these elements, to say it in brief, are impermanent and on to without self. This is named investigating the common-mark of the several elements.

Investigating class: one correctly investigates "the differentiated nature of the elements within the one lumped mark" — one who does not know this, and toward the body composed of the differentiation of elements arouses lofty conceit, is upside-down, belongs to the dark class (spoken at length as before); the one contrary to the above is not upside-down, belongs to the white class (spoken at length as before). This is named investigating the class of element.

Investigating time: one correctly investigates — that in the past, future, and present age, with the six elements as condition, one gains entry into the mother's womb. This is named investigating the time of element.

Investigating principle: one correctly investigates — as grass, wood, and the rest, a concurrence of many conditions ringing round empty space, are reckoned 〔and counted〕 as a "house," so, because the six elements serve as support, sinew, bone, blood, and flesh, a concurrence of many conditions ringing round empty space, by conventional supposition and the several suppositions and designation, are reckoned as a "body"; and again the several karmas and afflictions of former lives, and one's own seeds, serve as cause and condition. This is named investigating the principle of the differentiation of the several elements in dependence on the principle of reliance. And again one correctly investigates that, by well cultivating, well practicing, and well much-cultivating the contemplation of the differentiation of elements, one is able to sever conceit; and again one correctly investigates that this principle has the means of authoritative teaching, has inner realization-knowledge, has the dharma of inference, and has the establishing of the nature of things, the nature of things hard to conceive, the nature of things that abides — this is named investigating the principle of the differentiation of the several elements in dependence on the principle of function, the principle of proof, and the principle of the nature of things.

This is named the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of the differentiation of elements.

The Object-of-Six-Matters Applied to the Five Purifying Practices (5) Mindfulness of In-and-Out Breathing

What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates mindfulness of in-and-out breathing 〔the mindfulness of the in-breath and the out-breath〕?

Investigating meaning: in dependence on the reinforcing force of hearing and retaining the true Dharma that reinforces mindfulness of in-and-out breathing, one is able to know correctly that "binding the mind to the object-field of the in- and out-breath, penetrating it, and keeping it unforgotten and clearly noted" is the meaning of mindfulness of in-and-out breathing. This is named investigating its meaning.

Investigating thing: one correctly investigates — the in-breath and out-breath are to be found within, and because they are bound to the body and subsumed under the outer bases, they have an inner and outer differentiation. This is named investigating its thing.

Investigating the particular-mark: one correctly investigates — the in-breath is twofold and the out-breath is twofold: the wind entering within is named the in-breath, and the wind going out is named the out-breath; and one also knows correctly that this is a long in-breath and out-breath, that this is a short in-breath and out-breath, and that the breath pervades every part of the body. This is named investigating the particular-mark of the several breaths.

Investigating the common-mark: one correctly investigates — once the in-breath has ceased there is the arising of an out-breath, and once the out-breath has ceased there is the arising of an in-breath; the turning of the in- and out-breath is bound to the life-faculty and the conscious body, and this in- and out-breath and its support are all impermanent. This is named investigating the common-mark of the several breaths.

Investigating class: one correctly investigates — if, with regard to the in- and out-breath, one does not abide in right mindfulness and, by evil discursive thoughts, has the mind disturbed, this is upside-down, belongs to the dark class, is a dharma of strife (spoken at length as before); the one contrary to the above is not upside-down, belongs to the white class, is a dharma without strife (spoken at length as before). This is named investigating its class.

Investigating time: one correctly investigates — that in the past, future, and present age the turning of the in- and out-breath is bound to body and mind, and body and mind are bound to the in- and out-breath. This is named investigating its time.

Investigating principle: one correctly investigates — herein there is no "holder of the in-breath, holder of the out-breath" that would make the in- and out-breath bound to it; there is only, upon the several formations arisen from causes and conditions, an arousing of conventional supposition and, by designation, the speaking of there being one able to hold the in- and out-breath. This is named investigating its principle in dependence on the principle of reliance. And again one correctly investigates that, by well cultivating, well practicing, and well much-cultivating mindfulness of in-and-out breathing, one is able to sever discursive thought; and again one correctly investigates that this principle has the means of authoritative teaching, has inner realization-knowledge, has the dharma of inference, and has the establishing of the nature of things, the nature of things hard to conceive, the nature of things that abides, which ought not to be deliberated, ought not to be discriminated, and ought only to be met with conviction — this is named investigating its principle in dependence on the principle of function, the principle of proof, and the principle of the nature of things.

This is named the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates mindfulness of in-and-out breathing.

The Joined Operation of Tranquillity and Insight · The Object of Skill and the Object That Purifies the Afflictions Spoken of Later

Thus, in dependence on the object of the purifying practices, having investigated the differentiated contemplation of the six matters, one again and again stills the mind within, and again and again examines with care, with the practice of superior contemplation, what one has investigated: because he takes tranquillity as his support, he makes insight swiftly gain purity; and because he takes insight as his support, he makes tranquillity grow and become vast and great. As for investigating the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters in dependence on the object of skill and the object that purifies the afflictions, I shall speak of it in its own place 〔in the text below〕.

聲聞地 · 第三瑜伽處 · 白品九加行 · 淨障The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · The Third Yoga-Station · The Nine Preparatory Efforts of the Bright Class · Purifying the Obstructions

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

止觀體相立了,這一葉講「修中的手眼」:白品九種加行(怎麼下功才令心速疾得定)·應時加行裡的止觀舉捨四行·正加行的數除數遣(畫師弟子喻)→ 收於「如是名為心一境性」;接著淨障(科7:四因緣淨除四障)·止觀雙運道;末了中嗢柁南總攝,再起修作意(科8)的四種作意與鍛金師喻。逐句依玄奘譯本今語,名相留舊,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

白品九種加行:九種下功的對與不對

其次,這當中有九種「白品所攝加行」(順修的九種下功法);與這相違的,就是九種黑品所攝加行。哪九種白品加行?一相應加行、二串習加行、三無倒加行、四不緩加行、五應時加行、六解了加行、七無厭足加行、八不捨軛加行、九正加行。由這九種白品加行,能令心速疾得定、令三摩地轉更勝進;又由此,於所應往的地、所應得的果,速疾能往能得,沒有稽遲。黑品九加行則相反——不能令心速疾得定、不令三摩地勝進,於所應往所應得極大稽遲,不能速疾往得。

  • 相應加行:貪行者應於不淨安住其心、瞋行者於慈愍、癡行者於緣起、憍慢行者於界差別、尋思行者於阿那波那念安住其心;等分行者或薄塵行者,隨所樂攀緣一境安住其心,勤修加行。這樣名為相應加行。
  • 串習加行:於奢摩他、毘鉢舍那已曾數習乃至少分,不是一切都還在初修。為什麼?初修業者雖於相應所緣勤修加行,但諸蓋數數現行、身心麁重,所以不能令心速疾得定。這樣名為串習加行。
  • 不緩加行:以無間方便、殷重方便勤修觀行。若從定出——或為乞食、恭敬承事師長、看病、隨順修和敬業、或其餘所作事——心對那些事不全隨順、不全趣向、不全臨入,只求速令事究竟,便回來精勤宴坐寂靜修觀。與比丘、比丘尼、鄔波索迦、剎帝利、婆羅門等種種異眾相遇,雖久雜處、現相寒暄,卻不接著安立言論,唯樂遠離勤修觀行。又能勇猛精進——想:我今定當趣證所應證得,不應慢緩。為什麼?我有多種橫死因緣:身中風、熱、痰發動,或飲食不消成宿食病,或被蛇蝎蚰蜒百足等惡毒蟲所蛆螫(啃咬螫刺),或被人非人類所驚恐,因此夭沒。於這些橫死處恒常思惟、修無常想、住不放逸。由住不放逸,恒自思惟:我這壽命,倘能再經七日、六日、五日、四日、三日、二日、一日、一時、半時、須臾、半須臾、或一頓飯頃、或從入息到出息、或從出息到入息,只要能活這麼點時候,就要於佛聖教精勤作意修習瑜伽,這麼點時候裡,我於佛聖教定要多有所作。這樣名為不緩加行。
  • 無倒加行:如善達瑜伽行的諸瑜伽師所開示的,就如是學——於法、於義不顛倒取,無我慢,不安住自己的見取,無邪僻執,對尊長教誨終不輕毀。這樣名為無倒加行。
  • 應時加行:於時時間修止相、修觀相、修舉相、修捨相;又能如實了知止與止相止時、觀與觀相觀時、舉與舉相舉時、捨與捨相捨時。〔下別明止觀舉捨四行——〕
    • :就是九相心住,能令心無相、無分別、寂靜、極寂靜、等住寂止、純一無雜,故名為止。止相有二:所緣相(奢摩他品所知事同分影像,由此令心寂靜)、因緣相(依奢摩他所熏習的心,為令後時奢摩他定清淨而修的毘鉢舍那加行)。止時:心掉舉時、或恐掉舉時,是修止時;又依毘鉢舍那所熏習的心,被尋思及事業擾惱時,是修止時。
    • :就是四行、三門、六事差別所緣的觀行。觀相有二:所緣相(毘鉢舍那品所知事同分影像,由此令慧觀察)、因緣相(依毘鉢舍那所熏習的心,為令後時毘鉢舍那清淨而修的奢摩他加行)。觀時:心沈沒時、或恐沈沒時,是修觀時;又依奢摩他所熏習的心,先應於所知事如實覺了,那時是修觀時。
    • :由隨取一種淨妙所緣,顯示、勸導、慶慰其心。舉相:由淨妙所緣策勵其心、及隨順發勤精進。舉時:心沈下時、或恐沈下時,是修舉時。
    • :於所緣心無染污、心平等性,於止觀品調柔正直任運轉性,及調柔心有堪能性,令心隨與任運作用。捨相:由所緣令心上捨,及於所緣不發太過精進。捨時:於止觀品所有掉舉心已解脫,是修捨時。〔以上名應時加行。〕
  • 解了加行:於上說諸相善取善了;善取了後,欲入定即能入、欲住定即能住、欲起定即能起;或時棄捨諸三摩地所行影像,作意思惟諸不定地的本性所緣境界。這樣名為解了加行。
  • 無厭足加行:於善法無有厭足,修斷無廢,於展轉上、展轉勝處多住希求;不只得了少小靜定就在中路退屈,於其餘所作常有進求。這樣名為無厭足加行。
  • 不捨軛加行:於一切所受學處無穿、無缺;雖見少年顏容端正可愛的女子,而不取相、不取隨好;於食平等;勤修覺寤;少事、少業、少散亂;於久所作、久所說等,能自隨憶、令他隨憶。由這些法能正隨順心一境性,不捨其軛(不卸下擔子)、令心不散、不馳外境、內不僵硬。這樣名為不捨軛加行。
  • 正加行:於所緣數數起勝解、數數正除遣。如勤修不淨觀者,數數除遣、又數數現前那不淨作意所思惟的不淨相;由隨相行毘鉢舍那起作意,於所緣數數除遣、數數現前。這樣名為正加行。

正除遣的五種,與「而行」

那「正除遣」又有五種:一內攝其心、二不念作意、三於餘作意、四對治作意、五無相界作意。當中——由九相心住、毘鉢舍那為上首,名「內攝其心」;由最初背一切相、無亂安住,名「不念作意」;由緣其餘定地的境、思惟其餘定地,名「於餘作意」;由思惟不淨對治淨,乃至思惟阿那波那念對治尋思、思惟虛空界對治諸色,名「對治作意」;由一切相不作意思惟、於無相界作意思惟,名「無相界作意」。雖然遍立的正除遣相總有五種,但這裡正取的,唯是「內攝其心」與「不念作意」二種。

初修業者剛起修時,最初全不於所緣境繫縛其心(不論不淨或別處),只作這念:我心怎麼才能得無散亂、無相、無分別、寂靜、極寂靜、無轉無動、無所希望、離諸作用、於內適悅?這樣精勤,對所生起的一切外相無所思惟,名「不念作意」;即由這不念作意,除遣所緣。

他在這裡修瑜伽、攝受適悅,又行「有相、有分別」的不淨等境。怎麼「而行」?就是由隨相行、隨尋思行、隨伺察行毘鉢舍那行那境界,卻不一向只精勤毘鉢舍那;還捨下觀相,又於所緣思惟止行。由此,他那時於所緣境「不捨、不取」——由於緣上止行轉故,不名為捨;於緣上不作相、無分別故,不名為取。即由這樣內攝其心、除遣所緣;又於其中不取觀相故,於緣無亂;取止行故,又緣於所知事相。

若於所緣只一味起勝解、不數除遣,就不能令所有勝解後後明淨究竟而轉,不能往趣乃至現觀所知境事;由數起勝解、數正除遣,後後勝解展轉明淨究竟而轉,也能往趣乃至現觀所知境事。

畫師弟子喻:譬如世間畫師的弟子初習畫業,先從師處受所學的樣本,諦觀諦觀、作那形相;作完又作完,隨即除毀;既除毀,又再作。如此除毀、數數更作,那後後的形相就轉明、轉淨、究竟顯現;這樣正學,經歷多時,世人共推他為大畫師、或入師之列。若不數除所作形相、只在其上數數重畫,那形相永無明淨究竟可期。修觀的道理也是這樣。

若於這境起了勝解,一定要於這境再正除遣;不是於這境正除遣了,就一定再於這境起勝解。於狹小境起勝解了,就於狹小正除遣;廣大、無量也如此。於狹小境正除遣了,或於狹小、或於廣大、或於無量再起勝解;廣大無量也如此。又:若諸色法的相貌影像顯現,當知是麁、是變化相似;諸無色法以假名為先,如所領受的增上力,影像顯現。這一切名正加行。

這九種白品加行,於奢摩他、毘鉢舍那當知是隨順的;與它相違的九種加行,於奢摩他毘鉢舍那當知是違逆的。這樣黑品、白品差別建立的加行,共有十八種。如是名為心一境性。〔科6 一境性,至此結。〕

淨障:四因緣淨除四障

什麼是淨障?就是這樣正修加行的諸瑜伽師,由四因緣能令其心淨除諸障。哪四因緣?一遍知自性、二遍知因緣、三遍知過患、四修習對治。

也就是說,先遍知障的自性,再遍知障生起的因緣,又遍知不遠離它的過患,最後實際修習相應對治;四者具足,才能令心淨除諸障。

遍知諸障自性:能遍知障有四種——一怯弱障、二蓋覆障、三尋思障、四自舉障。怯弱障,是於出離及遠離勤修行時,所有染污的思慕、不樂、希望、憂惱。蓋覆障,就是貪欲等五蓋。尋思障,就是欲尋思等染污尋思。自舉障,是於少分下劣的智見安隱住中而自高舉——說「我能得,別人就不能」,乃至廣說如前。

逐障收束:勤修出離、遠離時所起的染污思慕、不樂、希望、憂惱,名為怯弱障;貪欲等五蓋,名為蓋覆障;欲尋思等染污尋思,名為尋思障;住於少分下劣智見而自高舉,以為「我能得,別人不能」,名為自舉障。這樣名為遍知諸障自性。

遍知諸障因緣:初「怯弱障」有六因緣——一由先業增上力、或疾病擾惱故身羸劣,二太過加行,三不修加行,四初修加行,五煩惱熾盛,六於遠離猶未串習。蓋覆、尋思、自舉三障的因緣,是於隨順這三障的法中「非理作意」多分串習。什麼是這裡的非理作意?不作意思惟不淨、而於淨相作意思惟;不作意思惟慈愍、而於瞋相作意思惟;不作意思惟明相、而於闇相作意思惟;不作意思惟奢摩他相、而於親屬國土不死、昔曾經歷的歡娛戲笑承奉等惡尋思作意思惟;不作意思惟緣性緣起、而於三世諸行計我我所、不如理想作意思惟——這些都是非理作意。

逐項說:不思惟不淨、反而思惟淨相,這在此處名為非理作意;不思惟慈愍、反而思惟瞋相,這在此處名為非理作意;不思惟明相、反而思惟闇相,這在此處名為非理作意;不思惟奢摩他相、反而思惟親屬、國土、不死及往昔歡娛戲笑承奉等惡尋思,這在此處名為非理作意;不思惟緣性緣起、反而於三世諸行計度我及我所,作不如理想,這在此處也名為非理作意。

遍知諸障過患:遍知這障有故,於那四種「未證不證、已證退失」,敗壞瑜伽加行,有染污住、有苦惱住,自毀毀他,身壞命終生諸惡趣。

修習對治:諸「怯弱」,總用隨念為對治——由隨念作意慶悅其心,令已生怯弱除遣、未生不生。身羸劣、太過加行、初修加行,用「精進平等通達」為對治。不修加行,用恭敬聽聞、勤加請問為對治。煩惱熾盛,用不淨等所緣加行為對治。若未串習,就用這樣的思擇方便為對治——想:我昔於遠離不串習,故今修遠離生怯弱;我若今不習遠離,當來世定又如此,所以我今應正思擇,對遠離捨去不喜樂、修習喜樂。其餘蓋覆等的非理作意,用與它相違的如理作意為對治。

所以,怯弱總由隨念作意慶悅其心來對治,使已生的除去、未生的不生;身體羸劣、加行太過與初修加行,由平等通達精進來對治;不修加行,由恭敬聽聞、勤加請問來對治;煩惱熾盛,由不淨等所緣加行來對治;遠離尚未串習,由思擇今生若仍不習、來世必又如此而捨不喜樂、修習喜樂來對治;其餘蓋覆、尋思、自舉所依的非理作意,則一一由相違的如理作意來對治。這樣名為修習對治。  又:遍知諸障自性「是能障礙、能染污、黑品攝、應遠離」;遍知諸障遠離的因緣,方可遠離,故應尋求諸障因緣;遍知「於應遠離而不遠離有何過患」,故應尋求諸障過患;既遠離了,又尋思「這些障怎麼來世當得不生」,故應尋求修習對治。由這因緣,能令其心淨除諸障。

止觀眾多·展轉相依·雙運轉道

要知道,由隨順教有眾多,毘鉢舍那也有眾多;毘鉢舍那眾多,令奢摩他也眾多。又這毘鉢舍那,由所知境無邊際,當知其量也無邊際——由三門及六種事,一一無邊品類差別,悟入道理。

正修行者:如他的毘鉢舍那串習清淨的增上力越強,就越增長廣大;如此,能生身心的奢摩他品輕安也越增長廣大。如身心越得輕安,於所緣的心一境性就越增長;心一境性越增長,又越獲得身心輕安。心一境性、身心輕安二法,展轉相依、展轉相屬;這二法若得「轉依」,方才究竟。得轉依故,於所知事生起「現量智」。

問:到什麼地步才說「究竟獲得不淨觀」?乃至到什麼地步才說「究竟獲得阿那波那念」?

答:要言之,修觀者於不淨觀的正加行中,親近、修習、多修習故,若行若住雖有種種境界現前、雖觀察所有眾相,而住自性、不由加行,多分都是不淨行相顯現、不是諸淨相;由於不淨善修習,對能隨順貪欲纏處的法,心不趣入、不愛樂、不信解,安住於捨、深生厭逆。那時修觀者應自了知:我今已得不淨觀、已得所修果——這才名為於不淨觀已得究竟;與此相違,名未得究竟。不淨觀如此,慈愍、緣性緣起、界差別、阿那波那念也如此。其中差別:多分慈心行相顯現、非瞋恚相;對能隨順瞋恚纏處的法,心不趣入、不愛樂、不信解,安住於捨、深生厭逆。多分無常、苦、空、無我行相顯現,不是常、樂、身見俱行的愚癡行相;對隨順愚癡纏處法,心也不趣入、不愛樂、不信解,安住於捨、深生厭逆。多分種種界性、非一界性的身聚差別相想顯現,不是身聚想;對隨順憍慢纏處法,心同樣不趣入、不愛樂、不信解,安住於捨、深生厭逆。多分內寂靜想、奢摩他想顯現,不是戲論想;對隨順尋思纏處法,心同樣不趣入、不愛樂、不信解,安住於捨、深生厭逆。

問:到什麼地步才說「奢摩他、毘鉢舍那二種和合平等俱轉」——由此名為雙運轉道?

答:若已獲得九相心住中的第九相心住(謂三摩呬多),他用這圓滿三摩地為所依止,於法觀中修增上慧;那時由法觀故,任運轉道、無功用轉、不由加行,毘鉢舍那清淨鮮白,隨奢摩他調柔攝受、如奢摩他道攝受而轉——到這地步,名為奢摩他、毘鉢舍那二種和合平等俱轉,由此名為雙運轉道。

中嗢柁南

中嗢柁南說:

  相、尋思、伺察,隨行有三門。
  義、事、相、品、時、理,六事差別。
  初相應加行,次串習、無緩、
  無顛倒、應時、解了、無厭足、
  不棄捨善軛,最後正加行,
  是九應當知,有二品差別。
  知自性、因緣,見彼諸過患,
  正修習對治,令障得清淨。

修作意:四種作意(科8 起)

什麼是修作意?就是初修業者剛起修時,於這樣所安立的普遍相中,由心一境性及淨諸障,離邪加行、學正加行。他應最初作這念:我今為證心一境性及斷喜樂,當勤修習四種作意。哪四種?一調練心作意、二滋潤心作意、三生輕安作意、四淨智見作意。

  • 調練心作意:由此作意,於可厭患的法令心厭離。這名調練心作意。
  • 滋潤心作意:由此作意,於可欣尚的法令心欣樂。這名滋潤心作意。
  • 生輕安作意:由此作意,於時時間於可厭法令心厭離、於時時間於可欣法令心欣樂後,安住內寂靜、無相、無分別中,一境念轉;由此對治一切身心麁重,能令一切身心適悅、生起一切身心輕安。這名生輕安作意。
  • 淨智見作意:由此作意,於時時間即用這內心寂靜為所依止,由內靜心數數加行,於法觀中修增上慧;修行者於時時間於可厭法令心厭離,如此於漏及漏處法,能令心生熱、等熱,生厭、等厭。這名淨智見作意。

什麼名「可厭患處」?略有四種:自衰損及他衰損正現前時,如理作意數思惟,成可厭處;自興盛及他興盛在過去盡滅離變壞時,如理作意數思惟,成可厭處。修行者於時時間於可欣法令心欣樂,由生欣樂,能令心極成津潤、融適澄淨。

什麼名「可欣尚處」?略有三種:一三寶、二學處清淨尸羅清淨、三於自所證差別深生信解心無怯弱。  隨念三寶令心欣樂:作這念——我今善得大利,蒙如來應正等覺為我大師;我今善得大利,於善說法毘柰耶中我得出家;我今善得大利,我與諸具戒具德、忍辱柔和、成賢善法的同梵行者共為法侶;我當得賢善命終、賢善殞沒、賢善趣於後世。  隨念學處清淨尸羅清淨令心欣樂:作這念——我今善得大利,於如來大師、善說法毘柰耶、善修正行的聲聞眾中,我得與同梵行者同戒、同學、同修慈仁身語意業、同所見、同所受用;這是「無悔為先,發生歡喜」。這就名為隨念學處清淨、尸羅清淨,令心欣樂。  於自所證差別深生信解、心無怯弱令心欣樂:作這念——我今有力、有所堪能,尸羅清淨、堪為法器,得與同梵行者同清淨戒、與有智正至善士同所見,我有堪能精勤修習如是正行,於現法中能得未得、能觸未觸、能證未證,由此令心生大歡喜。這就名為於自所證差別深生信解、心無怯弱之處,令心欣樂。又由前後勇猛精進,已得安住所證差別;由隨念此,又於後時所證差別深生信解,令心欣樂(這是「異門」的說法)。

那修行者,於可厭法調練其心,對能隨順諸漏處的法令心不向,違逆、棄背、離隔而住;於可欣法悅潤其心,對出、離所生諸法有親愛故,令心趣向、附著、喜樂、和合而住。如此他的心由「厭」「欣」二種行相,背諸黑品、向諸白品,輕易脫轉。心背黑品,由調練心作意;向白品,由滋潤心作意;於時時間依奢摩他內攝持心,由生輕安作意;於時時間於法思擇、最極思擇、周遍尋思、周遍伺察,由淨智見作意。如此他的心於時時間為奢摩他毘鉢舍那所攝受,堪能與一切行相、一切功德作攝受因,經歷日夜、剎那、臘縛、須臾,漸得勝進。

鍛金師喻:譬如有智巧的鍛金銀師、或他的弟子,於時時間燒鍊金銀、令它棄捨一切垢穢;於時時間投入清冷水,令它對種種莊嚴具的造作有所堪任、調柔隨順;於是這鍛金師或弟子,以相似的妙工巧智善了知後,用它作業具,隨所樂的莊嚴具中種種轉變。如此勤修瑜伽的行者,為令心棄背貪等一切垢穢、及棄背染污憂惱,於可厭法深生厭離;為令趣向所有清淨善品喜樂,於可欣法發生欣樂。於是行者,隨於那欲自安立的奢摩他品或毘鉢舍那品,便能善親附、善和合、無轉無動,隨所樂的種種義中如所信解,皆能成辦。

With the essence and character of tranquillity-and-insight now set up, this leaf teaches the "working hand and eye of cultivation": the nine preparatory efforts subsumed under the bright class (how to apply oneself so that the mind swiftly gains concentration) · within timely preparatory effort, the four practices of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity · the repeated resolving and repeated clearing-away of correct preparatory effort (the simile of the painter's apprentice) → gathered into "such is what is called one-pointedness of mind"; then purifying the obstructions (sub-section 7: purging the four obstructions by four causal factors) · the path of the yoked working of tranquillity and insight; and at the close, the middle uddāna gathers all together, and then the cultivation of attention (sub-section 8) is raised — the four kinds of attention and the simile of the goldsmith. Every word follows Xuanzang's translation in today's language; the technical names are kept in their old form; no doctrinal exposition is added, no treatise is cited, no Sanskrit is annotated; where the treatise-text is compressed, it is filled back in with 〔brackets〕.

The Nine Preparatory Efforts of the Bright Class: the Right and Wrong of the Nine Ways of Applying Oneself

Further, within this there are nine "preparatory efforts subsumed under the bright class" (the nine methods of applying oneself in accord with cultivation); and contrary to these are the nine preparatory efforts subsumed under the dark class. Which nine bright-class preparatory efforts? First, corresponding preparatory effort; second, repeated-practice preparatory effort; third, unerring preparatory effort; fourth, unslackened preparatory effort; fifth, timely preparatory effort; sixth, understanding preparatory effort; seventh, insatiable preparatory effort; eighth, yoke-not-cast-off preparatory effort; ninth, correct preparatory effort. By these nine bright-class preparatory efforts, one is able to make the mind swiftly gain concentration and to make the meditative concentration advance ever more excellently; and by these, too, one is able to reach swiftly the ground that should be reached and to gain swiftly the fruit that should be gained, without delay. The nine dark-class preparatory efforts are the reverse — they cannot make the mind swiftly gain concentration, do not make the meditative concentration advance, and with respect to what should be reached and what should be gained there is extreme delay, no swift reaching and gaining.

  • Corresponding preparatory effort: one who acts from greed should settle his mind on the impure; one who acts from hatred, on loving-kindness; one who acts from delusion, on dependent origination; one who acts from conceit, on the difference of the elements; one who acts from discursive thought, on mindfulness of in-breath and out-breath. One of balanced conduct, or one of thin dust, may — as he takes pleasure in it — take some single object as support and settle his mind upon it, diligently cultivating preparatory effort. This is called corresponding preparatory effort.
  • Repeated-practice preparatory effort: with tranquillity and insight one has already practiced repeatedly, if only in some small part — it is not that everything is still in first cultivation. Why? Even though one who is at first cultivating the work diligently cultivates preparatory effort upon the corresponding object, the several hindrances are present again and again, and body and mind are coarse and heavy, and so he cannot make the mind swiftly gain concentration. This is called repeated-practice preparatory effort.
  • Unslackened preparatory effort: with uninterrupted means and with earnest means one diligently cultivates the practice of insight. If one comes out of concentration — whether to beg for food, to reverently attend and serve one's teacher, to nurse the sick, to comply with the practice of the duties of harmony and respect, or for any other thing to be done — one's mind does not wholly comply with, does not wholly turn toward, does not wholly enter into those matters; one only seeks to bring the matter swiftly to its end, and then returns to sit diligently in stillness and quiet, cultivating insight. When one meets with various assorted crowds — monks, nuns, laymen (upāsaka), warriors, brahmins, and so on — even after long mingling, though one shows the marks of exchanging greetings, one does not then set up any discourse, but only delights in seclusion and diligently cultivates the practice of insight. And one is able to be valiant and vigorous, thinking: I must now surely proceed to realize what should be realized; I ought not to be slow and slack. Why? I have many causes and conditions of sudden death: within this body, the disturbance of wind, heat, and phlegm; or food and drink not digested becoming the disease of undigested food; or being gnawed and stung (bitten, stung, and pierced) by snakes, scorpions, centipedes, millipedes, and other venomous vermin; or being terrified by humans or non-humans, and thereby dying untimely. Concerning these places of sudden death one should constantly reflect, cultivate the perception of impermanence, and abide in non-heedlessness. By abiding in non-heedlessness, one constantly reflects thus: this lifespan of mine — should it be able to last yet seven days, six days, five days, four days, three days, two days, one day, one hour, half an hour, a moment, half a moment, or the space of a single meal, or from an in-breath to an out-breath, or from an out-breath to an in-breath — for just so long as I can live, I will diligently direct attention upon the Buddha's holy teaching and cultivate yoga; in just so long a span, I must surely accomplish much in the Buddha's holy teaching. This is called unslackened preparatory effort.
  • Unerring preparatory effort: as the yoga practitioners well versed in the practice of yoga instruct, just so one learns — taking neither dharma nor meaning in an inverted way, without self-conceit, not settling into one's own dogmatic grasping of views, without deviant clinging, and never slighting or demeaning the instruction of one's elders. This is called unerring preparatory effort.
  • Timely preparatory effort: at each and every moment one cultivates the mark of tranquillity, cultivates the mark of insight, cultivates the mark of exertion, cultivates the mark of equanimity; and one is able to know as it really is: tranquillity, the mark of tranquillity, and the time for tranquillity; insight, the mark of insight, and the time for insight; exertion, the mark of exertion, and the time for exertion; equanimity, the mark of equanimity, and the time for equanimity. 〔What follows separately clarifies the four practices of tranquillity, insight, exertion, and equanimity —〕
    • Tranquillity: this is the nine marks of mental settling, able to make the mind markless, non-discriminating, quieted, utterly quieted, evenly abiding in stilled tranquillity, unmixedly pure and one — hence it is named tranquillity. The mark of tranquillity is twofold: the object-mark (the image corresponding in kind to the thing known within the class of tranquillity, whereby the mind is quieted) and the causal-condition-mark (the practice of insight cultivated, in dependence on a mind perfumed by tranquillity, so as to purify the tranquillity-concentration for a later time). The time for tranquillity: when the mind is agitated, or when one fears agitation, this is the time to cultivate tranquillity; and when the mind perfumed by insight is troubled by discursive thought and by activities, this is the time to cultivate tranquillity.
    • Insight: this is the practice of insight upon objects distinguished by the four practices, the three gateways, and the six matters. The mark of insight is twofold: the object-mark (the image corresponding in kind to the thing known within the class of insight, whereby wisdom examines) and the causal-condition-mark (the practice of tranquillity cultivated, in dependence on a mind perfumed by insight, so as to purify the insight for a later time). The time for insight: when the mind sinks, or when one fears sinking, this is the time to cultivate insight; and in dependence on a mind perfumed by tranquillity, when one should first understand the thing known as it really is, that is the time to cultivate insight.
    • Exertion: by taking up some one pure and excellent object, one displays, urges on, and gladdens one's mind. The mark of exertion: by a pure and excellent object one spurs on one's mind, and one accordingly gives rise to diligent vigor. The time for exertion: when the mind sinks down, or when one fears it will sink down, this is the time to cultivate exertion.
    • Equanimity: toward the object the mind is undefiled and of an even nature; within the class of tranquillity and insight there is the nature of being supple, upright, and spontaneously turning, and the mind, being supple, has capability, so that one lets the mind go along in spontaneous operation. The mark of equanimity: by the object one lets the mind be released above, and one does not put forth excessive vigor upon the object. The time for equanimity: when the agitated mind within the class of tranquillity and insight has been liberated, this is the time to cultivate equanimity. 〔The above is named timely preparatory effort.〕
  • Understanding preparatory effort: with respect to the several marks spoken of above, one takes them well and understands them well; and having taken and understood them well, when one wishes to enter concentration one can enter, when one wishes to abide in concentration one can abide, when one wishes to rise from concentration one can rise; or at times one casts off the images ranged over in the several meditative concentrations and directs one's attention to reflect upon the essential objects proper to the several non-concentrated grounds. This is called understanding preparatory effort.
  • Insatiable preparatory effort: with respect to wholesome dharmas one has no satiety, one cultivates cutting-off without letting it lapse, and in the successively higher, successively more excellent places one dwells much in aspiration; not merely gaining some small tranquil concentration does one shrink back midway on the road, but with respect to the rest that should be done one constantly has advancing aspiration. This is called insatiable preparatory effort.
  • Yoke-not-cast-off preparatory effort: with respect to all the points of training one has received, there is no breach and no lack; though one sees a young woman of upright and lovely countenance, one does not take up her mark and does not take up her fine features; toward food one is even-minded; one diligently cultivates wakefulness; one has few affairs, few undertakings, little distraction; with respect to what was long ago done and long ago said, one can call it back to oneself and cause others to call it back. By these dharmas one can rightly accord with one-pointedness of mind, not casting off its yoke (not laying down the load), keeping the mind from scattering, from racing after external objects, from becoming inwardly stiff. This is called yoke-not-cast-off preparatory effort.
  • Correct preparatory effort: with respect to the object one again and again arouses resolute conviction, and again and again correctly clears it away. As one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of the impure again and again clears away, and again and again brings before himself, that impure mark reflected upon by the impure attention; by the attention aroused through insight that practices in accordance with the mark, with respect to the object one again and again clears away and again and again brings before oneself. This is called correct preparatory effort.

The Five Kinds of Correct Clearing-Away, and "How One Practices"

That "correct clearing-away" is again of five kinds: first, inwardly gathering one's mind; second, the attention of not-minding; third, attention upon another [ground]; fourth, the attention of counteraction; fifth, the attention of the markless element. Among these — by the nine marks of mental settling with insight at the head, it is named "inwardly gathering one's mind"; by turning one's back at the very outset upon all marks and abiding without disorder, it is named "the attention of not-minding"; by taking as object the domains of the other meditative grounds and reflecting upon the other meditative grounds, it is named "attention upon another"; by reflecting on the impure as a counteraction to the pure, and so on down to reflecting on mindfulness of in-breath and out-breath as a counteraction to discursive thought, and reflecting on the element of empty space as a counteraction to the several materialities, it is named "the attention of counteraction"; by not directing attention or reflection upon any mark and by directing attention and reflection upon the markless element, it is named "the attention of the markless element." Although the correct clearing-away marks, universally established, come to five kinds in all, what is here properly taken up is only the two kinds "inwardly gathering one's mind" and "the attention of not-minding."

When one who is at first cultivating the work first sets to cultivation, at the very outset he does not at all bind his mind upon the object-domain (whether the impure or somewhere else), but makes only this thought: how might my mind gain being unscattered, markless, non-discriminating, quieted, utterly quieted, unturning and unmoving, without any longing, apart from all operations, inwardly at ease? Being thus diligent, with respect to all the external marks that arise he reflects upon nothing — this is named "the attention of not-minding"; and it is by this attention of not-minding that he clears away the object.

Here he cultivates yoga and takes up ease, and also practices the "having-mark, having-discrimination" objects — the impure and the like. How does he "practice"? It is that by the insight that practices in accordance with the mark, in accordance with discursive thought, in accordance with examination, he practices that domain, yet does not one-sidedly put forth diligence only in insight; he also lays down the mark of insight, and again reflects upon the practice of tranquillity with respect to the object. By this, at that time, with respect to the object-domain he "neither casts off nor takes up" — because the practice of tranquillity turns upon the object, it is not named casting-off; because upon the object he makes no mark and does not discriminate, it is not named taking-up. It is precisely by thus inwardly gathering his mind that he clears away the object; and because within this he does not take up the mark of insight, with respect to the object there is no disorder; and because he takes up the practice of tranquillity, he takes the thing known as his object-mark once more.

If with respect to the object one merely arouses resolute conviction and does not again and again clear it away, then one cannot make all the resolute convictions turn ever after clearer, purer, and more thoroughgoing, and cannot proceed onward, even to the direct realization of the object-thing known; by again and again arousing resolute conviction and again and again correctly clearing away, the later and later resolute convictions turn successively clearer, purer, and more thoroughgoing, and one can also proceed onward, even to the direct realization of the object-thing known.

The simile of the painter's apprentice: it is like the apprentice of a painter in the world, who at first learns the work of painting — he first receives from his master the model to be learned, contemplates it and contemplates it, and makes that shape; having made it and made it, he straightaway wipes it out; having wiped it out, he makes it once more. Thus wiping out, and making it again and again, those later and later shapes turn clearer, turn purer, and are thoroughly manifested; learning rightly in this way, after passing through much time, the people of the world together acclaim him as a great painter, or reckon him among the ranks of the masters. If he does not repeatedly wipe out the shape he has made, but only paints over it again and again upon the same, that shape can never have any hope of clarity, purity, and thoroughness. The principle of cultivating insight is likewise.

If one has aroused resolute conviction upon this object, one must surely correctly clear away again upon this object; it is not that, having correctly cleared away upon this object, one must surely arouse resolute conviction again upon this object. Having aroused resolute conviction upon a narrow-and-small object, one correctly clears away upon the narrow-and-small; the vast and the measureless are likewise. Having correctly cleared away upon a narrow-and-small object, one arouses resolute conviction again upon the narrow-and-small, or upon the vast, or upon the measureless; the vast and the measureless are likewise. Further: if the shape-images of the several material dharmas are manifested, one should know that they are coarse, resembling transformations; the several non-material dharmas take conceptual designation as prior, and, as by the dominant force of what is experienced, their images are manifested. All of this is named correct preparatory effort.

These nine bright-class preparatory efforts, one should know, are concordant with tranquillity and insight; the nine preparatory efforts contrary to them, one should know, are discordant with tranquillity and insight. The preparatory efforts thus established by the distinction of dark class and bright class come to eighteen kinds in all. Such is what is called one-pointedness of mind. 〔Sub-section 6, one-pointedness, concludes here.〕

Purifying the Obstructions: Purging the Four Obstructions by Four Causal Factors

What is purifying the obstructions? It is that the yoga practitioners who thus correctly cultivate preparatory effort are able, by four causal factors, to make their minds purge the several obstructions. Which four causal factors? First, thoroughly knowing the intrinsic nature; second, thoroughly knowing the causes and conditions; third, thoroughly knowing the faults; fourth, cultivating the counteraction.

That is: first one thoroughly knows the obstruction's intrinsic nature, then the causes and conditions by which it arises, then the faults of not keeping it far away, and finally one actually cultivates the corresponding counteraction. Only with all four does one make the mind purge the several obstructions.

Thoroughly knowing the intrinsic nature of the several obstructions: one is able to thoroughly know that the obstructions are of four kinds — first, the obstruction of faint-heartedness; second, the obstruction of covering-over; third, the obstruction of discursive thought; fourth, the obstruction of self-exaltation. The obstruction of faint-heartedness is, when one diligently cultivates renunciation and seclusion, all the defiled longing, displeasure, hankering, and grief. The obstruction of covering-over is precisely the five hindrances — sensual desire and the rest. The obstruction of discursive thought is precisely the defiled discursive thoughts — the discursive thought of desire and the rest. The obstruction of self-exaltation is exalting oneself while abiding at ease in some small and inferior knowledge-and-vision — saying "I am able to attain it, others then cannot," and so on as widely stated before.

To close each obstruction separately: the defiled longing, displeasure, hankering, and grief that arise while one diligently cultivates renunciation and seclusion are called the obstruction of faint-heartedness; the five hindrances, sensual desire and the rest, are called the obstruction of covering-over; defiled discursive thoughts, the thought of desire and the rest, are called the obstruction of discursive thought; and exalting oneself while abiding in some small and inferior knowledge-and-vision, thinking "I can attain it, others cannot," is called the obstruction of self-exaltation. This is called thoroughly knowing the intrinsic nature of the several obstructions.

Thoroughly knowing the causes and conditions of the several obstructions: the first, the "obstruction of faint-heartedness," has six causal conditions — first, being feeble in body through the dominant force of prior karma, or through the trouble of illness; second, excessive preparatory effort; third, not cultivating preparatory effort; fourth, first cultivating preparatory effort; fifth, the afflictions being ablaze; sixth, not yet having practiced seclusion repeatedly. The causes and conditions of the three obstructions of covering-over, discursive thought, and self-exaltation are the "unprincipled attention" practiced repeatedly, for the most part, within the dharmas that accord with these three obstructions. What is unprincipled attention here? Not directing attention to reflect upon the impure, but directing attention to reflect upon the pure mark; not directing attention to reflect upon loving-kindness, but directing attention to reflect upon the mark of hatred; not directing attention to reflect upon the mark of brightness, but directing attention to reflect upon the mark of darkness; not directing attention to reflect upon the mark of tranquillity, but directing attention to reflect upon evil discursive thoughts — of kin, of homeland, of not-dying, of the merriments, jests, laughter, and attendances one once passed through; not directing attention to reflect upon the causal nature of dependent origination, but directing attention to reflect, in an unprincipled way, upon a self and what belongs to a self among the formations of the three times — these are all unprincipled attention.

Item by item: not reflecting upon the impure but reflecting upon the pure mark is here called unprincipled attention; not reflecting upon loving-kindness but reflecting upon the mark of hatred is here called unprincipled attention; not reflecting upon the mark of brightness but reflecting upon the mark of darkness is here called unprincipled attention; not reflecting upon the mark of tranquillity but reflecting upon evil thoughts of kin, homeland, not-dying, and former merriment, jesting, laughter, and attendance is here called unprincipled attention; not reflecting upon the causal nature of dependent origination but construing a self and what belongs to a self among the formations of the three times is likewise here called unprincipled attention.

Thoroughly knowing the faults of the several obstructions: because one thoroughly knows that this obstruction is present, one, with respect to those four — "not realizing what is not yet realized, and losing what is already realized" — spoils the preparatory effort of yoga, has a defiled abiding, has a suffering-and-vexed abiding, ruins oneself and ruins others, and, when the body breaks up and life ends, is born into the several evil destinies.

Cultivating the counteraction: for the several "faint-hearted," recollection is used overall as the counteraction — by the attention of recollection one gladdens one's mind, so that faint-heartedness already arisen is cleared away and, not yet arisen, does not arise. For feebleness of body, excessive preparatory effort, and first cultivating preparatory effort, "the even and penetrating exercise of vigor" is used as the counteraction. For not cultivating preparatory effort, reverent listening and diligent inquiry are used as the counteraction. For the afflictions being ablaze, the preparatory effort upon such objects as the impure is used as the counteraction. If one has not practiced repeatedly, then such a means of reasoned discernment as this is used as the counteraction — thinking: because I once did not practice seclusion repeatedly, therefore now, cultivating seclusion, faint-heartedness arises; if I now do not practice seclusion, in the world to come it will surely be like this again, and so I now ought to reason correctly, casting off displeasure toward seclusion and cultivating delight in it. For the rest — the unprincipled attention of covering-over and the like — the principled attention contrary to it is used as the counteraction.

Thus faint-heartedness as a whole is counteracted by the recollective attention that gladdens the mind, clearing away what has arisen and preventing what has not arisen; bodily feebleness, excessive preparatory effort, and first cultivation are counteracted by evenly penetrating vigor; failure to cultivate is counteracted by reverent listening and diligent inquiry; blazing afflictions are counteracted by preparatory effort upon the impure and the other appropriate objects; seclusion not yet repeatedly practiced is counteracted by discerning that, if it is still not practiced in this life, the same faint-heartedness must recur in the next, and thus casting off displeasure and cultivating delight; the unprincipled attention underlying the remaining obstructions of covering-over, discursive thought, and self-exaltation is counteracted in each case by the contrary principled attention. This is called cultivating the counteraction.  Further: one thoroughly knows that the intrinsic nature of the several obstructions "is able to obstruct, is able to defile, is subsumed under the dark class, and should be kept far from"; one thoroughly knows that only by the causes and conditions of keeping far from the several obstructions can one keep far from them, and so one should seek out the causes and conditions of the several obstructions; one thoroughly knows "what fault there is in not keeping far from what should be kept far from," and so one should seek out the faults of the several obstructions; and having kept far from them, one reflects further, "how are these obstructions to be made not to arise in the world to come," and so one should seek out the cultivation of the counteraction. By these causal factors one is able to make one's mind purge the several obstructions.

Tranquillity and Insight Being Many · Successively Depending upon Each Other · the Path of Their Yoked Working

One should know that, because those that accord with the teaching are many, insight too is many; and because insight is many, it makes tranquillity too be many. And this insight — because the object known is boundless, one should know that its measure too is boundless — by the three gateways and the six kinds of matter, in each and every boundless class and distinction, one penetratingly enters into the principle.

For one who correctly cultivates: the stronger the dominant force by which his insight is practiced repeatedly and purified, the more it increases and grows vast; and thus the pliancy of body and mind, within the class of tranquillity that can be produced, also increases and grows vast. As body and mind gain more pliancy, the one-pointedness of mind toward the object increases the more; as one-pointedness of mind increases the more, one again gains more pliancy of body and mind. The two dharmas — one-pointedness of mind, and pliancy of body and mind — successively depend upon each other, successively belong to each other; and these two dharmas, only if they gain "the transformation of the basis," are then thoroughgoing. Because one gains the transformation of the basis, with respect to the thing known there arises "direct-perception knowledge."

Question: to what point does one say "one has thoroughgoingly gained the contemplation of the impure"? And so on, to what point does one say "one has thoroughgoingly gained mindfulness of in-breath and out-breath"?

Answer: to state it in brief, because one who cultivates insight, within the correct preparatory effort of the contemplation of the impure, draws near, cultivates, and cultivates much — then whether walking or abiding, though various object-domains be present before him and though he examine all the several marks, yet abiding in his own nature, not through preparatory effort, for the most part it is impure marks that are manifested, not the several pure marks; and because he has well cultivated the impure, toward the dharmas that are able to accord with the ground of the enwrapment of greed, his mind does not proceed inward, does not take delight, does not gain conviction, but abides in equanimity and deeply gives rise to weary aversion. At that time the one who cultivates insight should know for himself: I have now gained the contemplation of the impure, have gained the fruit of what I cultivated — this alone is named having thoroughgoingly gained the contemplation of the impure; contrary to this, it is named not having gained thoroughgoingness. As with the contemplation of the impure, so with loving-kindness, the causal nature of dependent origination, the difference of the elements, and mindfulness of in-breath and out-breath. Among these the distinctions are: for the most part it is the marks of the loving-kind mind that are manifested, not the marks of hatred; toward the dharmas that accord with the ground of the enwrapment of hatred, the mind does not proceed inward, take delight, or gain conviction, but abides in equanimity and deeply gives rise to weary aversion. For the most part it is the marks of impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and no-self that are manifested, not the deluded marks that go together with permanence, pleasure, and the view of a bodily self; toward the dharmas that accord with the ground of the enwrapment of delusion, the mind likewise does not proceed inward, take delight, or gain conviction, but abides in equanimity and deeply gives rise to weary aversion. For the most part it is the mark-perceptions of the difference of the body-aggregate as of various elemental natures, not of a single elemental nature, that are manifested, not the perception of a body-aggregate as one; toward the dharmas that accord with the ground of the enwrapment of conceit, the mind likewise does not proceed inward, take delight, or gain conviction, but abides in equanimity and deeply gives rise to weary aversion. For the most part it is the perception of inner quieting, the perception of tranquillity, that is manifested, not the perception of idle proliferation; toward the dharmas that accord with the ground of the enwrapment of discursive thought, the mind likewise does not proceed inward, take delight, or gain conviction, but abides in equanimity and deeply gives rise to weary aversion.

Question: to what point does one say "the two, tranquillity and insight, join together and, in even balance, turn together" — whereby it is named the path of the yoked working?

Answer: if one has already gained, within the nine marks of mental settling, the ninth mark of mental settling (that is, meditative equipoise), and, taking this consummate meditative concentration as his support, he cultivates the higher wisdom within the contemplation of dharmas; then, because of the contemplation of dharmas, the path turns spontaneously, turns without exertion, not through preparatory effort, and insight is pure and bright-white, and, following tranquillity, is supple, taken up, and turns as taken up by the path of tranquillity — to this point it is named the two, tranquillity and insight, joining together and, in even balance, turning together, and by this it is named the path of the yoked working.

The Middle Uddāna

The middle uddāna says:

  The mark, discursive thought, examination — the three gateways that follow along in practice.
  Meaning, thing, mark, class, time, principle — the six matters and their distinctions.
  First, corresponding preparatory effort; next, repeated-practice, unslackened,
  unerring, timely, understanding, insatiable,
  not casting off the wholesome yoke, and last, correct preparatory effort —
  these nine one should know, having two classes and their distinction.
  Knowing the intrinsic nature and the causes and conditions, seeing their several faults,
  correctly cultivating the counteraction, one makes the obstructions become purified.

The Cultivation of Attention: the Four Kinds of Attention (Sub-section 8 is raised)

What is the cultivation of attention? It is that when one who is at first cultivating the work first sets to cultivation, within the universal mark thus established, by one-pointedness of mind and the purging of the several obstructions, he departs from wrong preparatory effort and learns correct preparatory effort. He should at the very outset make this thought: I now, in order to realize one-pointedness of mind and to cut off delight, will diligently cultivate the four kinds of attention. Which four? First, the attention that trains the mind; second, the attention that moistens the mind; third, the attention that produces pliancy; fourth, the attention of pure knowledge-and-vision.

  • The attention that trains the mind: by this attention, toward the dharmas that may be found wearisome, one makes the mind avert in weariness. This is called the attention that trains the mind.
  • The attention that moistens the mind: by this attention, toward the dharmas that may be found admirable, one makes the mind rejoice with delight. This is called the attention that moistens the mind.
  • The attention that produces pliancy: by this attention, at each and every moment, having made the mind avert in weariness toward the dharmas that may be found wearisome and made the mind rejoice with delight toward the dharmas that may be found admirable, one abides in the inner quieting, markless, non-discriminating, and turns in one-pointed mindfulness; by this one counteracts all coarseness and heaviness of body and mind, and is able to make all body and mind be at ease and to give rise to all pliancy of body and mind. This is called the attention that produces pliancy.
  • The attention of pure knowledge-and-vision: by this attention, at each and every moment, taking this very inwardly quieted mind as his support, by repeated preparatory effort from the inwardly stilled mind he cultivates the higher wisdom within the contemplation of dharmas; the cultivator, at each and every moment, makes the mind avert in weariness toward the dharmas that may be found wearisome, and thus, toward the outflows and the dharmas that are grounds for outflows, is able to make the mind grow hot, evenly hot, grow weary, evenly weary. This is called the attention of pure knowledge-and-vision.

What is named "the ground of what may be found wearisome"? In brief there are four kinds: when the decline of oneself and the decline of another are present before one, and one reflects on them again and again with principled attention, they become grounds of the wearisome; when the flourishing of oneself and the flourishing of another are in the past, wholly perished, departed, and altered-and-ruined, and one reflects on them again and again with principled attention, they become grounds of the wearisome. The cultivator, at each and every moment, makes the mind rejoice with delight toward the dharmas that may be found admirable, and, by the arising of delight, is able to make the mind exceedingly saturated, softened, and clarified-and-cleared.

What is named "the ground of what may be found admirable"? In brief there are three kinds: first, the Three Jewels; second, the purity of the points of training, the purity of moral discipline; third, deeply giving rise to conviction, with a mind unfaint, toward the difference of what one has oneself realized.  Recollecting the Three Jewels so as to make the mind rejoice with delight: making this thought — I now well gain a great benefit, in that the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Fully and Perfectly Awakened, is my great teacher; I now well gain a great benefit, in that within the well-spoken Dharma-Vinaya I have gone forth to homelessness; I now well gain a great benefit, in that with fellow practitioners of the pure life who are endowed with discipline and endowed with virtue, patient, gentle, and accomplished in wholesome dharmas, I am joined as companions in the Dharma; I shall gain a wholesome ending of life, a wholesome passing away, a wholesome proceeding to the world to come.  Recollecting the purity of the points of training and the purity of moral discipline so as to make the mind rejoice with delight: making this thought — I now well gain a great benefit, in that within the great teacher the Tathāgata, the well-spoken Dharma-Vinaya, and the assembly of śrāvakas who well cultivate right conduct, I have gained, together with fellow practitioners of the pure life, the same discipline, the same training, the same cultivation of loving and kindly deeds of body, speech, and mind, the same views, the same things enjoyed; this is "having non-regret as its prior, giving rise to gladness." This is called recollecting the purity of the points of training and the purity of moral discipline so as to make the mind rejoice with delight.  Deeply giving rise to conviction, with a mind unfaint, toward the difference of what one has oneself realized, so as to make the mind rejoice with delight: making this thought — I now have power, have capability, my moral discipline is pure and fit to be a vessel of the Dharma; I have gained, together with fellow practitioners of the pure life, the same pure precepts, and, together with wise, rightly-arrived, good persons, the same views; I have the capability diligently to cultivate such right conduct, and within the present dharma am able to gain what is not yet gained, to touch what is not yet touched, to realize what is not yet realized — by this I make the mind give rise to great gladness. This is called making the mind rejoice with delight at the site where one deeply gives rise to conviction, with a mind unfaint, toward the difference of what one has oneself realized. And further, by valiant vigor before and after, I have already come to abide in the difference of what I have realized; by recollecting this, I again, at a later time, deeply give rise to conviction toward the difference of what I have realized, and make the mind rejoice with delight (this is the "alternate account").

That cultivator, toward the dharmas that may be found wearisome, trains his mind, and toward the dharmas that are able to accord with the grounds of the several outflows, makes the mind not turn toward them, but abide in a way that is discordant, cast off, and set apart; toward the dharmas that may be found admirable, he gladdens and moistens his mind, and, because he has affection for the dharmas produced from departure and seclusion, makes the mind proceed toward them, cleave to them, delight in them, and abide in harmony with them. Thus his mind, by the two marks of "weariness" and "delight," turns its back on the several dark classes and turns toward the several bright classes, easily loosed and turned. The mind's turning its back on the dark class is by the attention that trains the mind; its turning toward the bright class is by the attention that moistens the mind; at each and every moment, in dependence on tranquillity, inwardly gathering and holding the mind, is by the attention that produces pliancy; at each and every moment, discerning dharmas, discerning them utterly, universally seeking them out, universally examining them, is by the attention of pure knowledge-and-vision. Thus his mind, at each and every moment, being taken up by tranquillity and insight, becomes capable of serving as a cause that takes up all practice-marks and all virtues, and, passing through days and nights, instants, lava, and moments, gradually gains advancement.

The simile of the goldsmith: it is like a wise and skillful smith of gold and silver, or his apprentice, who at each and every moment smelts and refines the gold and silver, making it cast off all impurity and filth; and at each and every moment casts it into cool clear water, making it fit and pliant, supple and compliant, for the fashioning of the several ornaments; and then this smith, or his apprentice, having well understood by his corresponding fine and skillful knowledge, uses it as his working material and, among whatever ornaments he takes pleasure in, transforms it in various ways. Thus the one who diligently cultivates yoga, in order to make the mind turn its back on greed and all impurity and filth, and turn its back on defiled grief-and-vexation, deeply gives rise to weary aversion toward the dharmas that may be found wearisome; and in order to make it proceed toward the delight of all pure and wholesome classes, gives rise to rejoicing-delight toward the dharmas that may be found admirable. And then the practitioner, with respect to whichever class — of tranquillity or of insight — he wishes to establish himself in, is able to cleave to it well, to harmonize with it well, without turning and without moving, and, among whatever meanings he takes pleasure in, is able to accomplish all just as he is convinced.

聲聞地 · 第三瑜伽處 · 初修業者 · 行差別The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · Third Yoga-Station · The Beginner in Practice · The Differences of Conduct

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

修作意的框架立了,這末葉把整套止觀教授,落到一個剛上路的人身上:老師怎麼教初修業者取五種相、一步步從厭離到欣樂、用過患相與光明相校心、依不淨觀趣入四念住;中間以「油鉢喻」(世尊密意說)顯四念住的專注;末了貪行說完,慈愍·緣起·界差別·數息四行各別交代趣入門;最後講「作意成就」——身心輕安從微劣到強盛,行者始名「有作意」、墮有作意數,第三瑜伽處的修,到這裡才真正落地。逐句依玄奘譯本今語,名相留舊,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

初修業者起修:先取五種相

這是《本地分》〈聲聞地〉第十三的第三瑜伽處第三部分。

什麼是初修業者剛起修時,於修作意如應安立、隨所安立正修行,最初觸證「斷喜樂」的心一境性?

善通達瑜伽的師長,最初對初修業者這樣教誨:「善來賢首!你們今者,應依三種取相因緣——或見、或聞、或心比度增上分別——取五種相:一厭離相、二欣樂相、三過患相、四光明相、五了別事相。」

這三種取相因緣要逐項了知:親自看見所緣,就依「見」而取相;從他人處聽聞所緣,就依「聞」而取相;不是現見、現聞,而由心中比較推度,就依「心比度增上分別」而取相。依這三種因緣,厭離相、欣樂相、過患相、光明相、了別事相五者,各各都能成為初修業者所取的相。

問:若初修業者是貪行人,本該由不淨觀調伏,怎麼還教他取這五種相? 答:應這樣教誨——

貪行初修(一)取厭離相

「善來賢首!你隨所住的村邑聚落,若聽說別的村邑,有男有女先享安樂、後遭苦厄;或那男女自遭重病、命終殞沒;或他們的親友眷屬遭這樣的苦;或那聚落喪失財寶——或被強敵所奪、或火燒、或水漂、或由失誤喪失、或由不善經營喪失、或由不善處置喪失、或被人趁共財之便而失、或由家中失火而失。若是你親見、不是傳聞;或就在此村、不是別村;或不是別村別人、正是你自身——先前親嘗的猛利樂受,後來退失(廣說如前)。你聞了、見了,應當生起深深的厭患:這生死實在是重苦,所得的身軀極大艱辛,而其中竟有這許多自他衰損的差別——病的衰損、壽命的衰損、眷屬的衰損、財寶的衰損,有病、有病的法性,有死、有死的法性;又有一類,是淨戒的衰損、正見的衰損。由這因緣,那些眾生現法中住諸苦惱、當來世往諸惡趣。而那些興盛的人,雖現法安樂、當來生善趣,卻是無常——這無常當下就可證得:凡領受興盛的,後時衰損定當現前;凡領受衰損的,後時興盛難可現前。興盛之事,都是難得而易壞之法。你應這樣深心厭患、極善作意、如理受持:這樣的處所實難保信。我今在這生死流轉中,未般涅槃、未解脫心,難可保信。願這衰損、興盛二法莫現我前;莫由它教我墮在這處所,生起猛利、剛強、辛楚、不適意的苦。就由這事的增上力,我當至誠喜樂於斷、修不放逸;又由我這樣多安住,當能於無義作個邊際(了結)。你應這樣善極作意、如理受持。」

貪行初修(二)取欣樂相

「你取了厭離相,還應精勤取欣樂相。當自觀察所受的尸羅:是善清淨?是不清淨?我或失念、或不恭敬、或多煩惱、或由無知,於諸學處有所違犯;既違犯了,我當如法以本性增上意樂,於諸學處發起深心,更不毀犯——所作當作、非所作不作;要言之,於諸學處當令增上意樂圓滿、所有加行圓滿。你這樣正觀察時,若自知戒蘊清淨,雖不刻意作念『我當發起清淨無悔』,然法爾地,尸羅淨者定生這清淨無悔;既起無悔,雖不刻意作念『我起歡悅』,然法爾地,無悔者定生歡悅。如此先於一種歡悅的所依處,你應生起『以無悔為先』的歡悅。又於『除障』的喜悅處,當生喜悅——想:我今尸羅清淨,有力有能安住世尊所制學處,於現法中能得未得、能觸未觸、能證未證。由這處所生起喜悅之意。若你獲得前後所證的少分差別,就由這增上力,對他人(諸如來、或聖弟子)的圓滿所證、及自己後時的所證差別,當生信解、發喜悅意。這些適悅之意,先名歡悅、今名喜悅,總名悅意。這名為取欣樂相。」

貪行初修(三)教授:調練滋潤·住內等住

取了這相,又應教授,告言:「賢首!你由這厭離相調練其心,又由這欣樂相滋潤其心,於斷滅世間貪憂應多安住。隨於各各所緣境界勤修加行,或奢摩他品、或毘鉢舍那品;即於那所緣令心內住、等住。你當獲得身心輕安及一境性。」

貪行初修(四)取過患相·六種行取相

「你若這樣背諸黑品、向諸白品,由調練心、滋潤心,又應數數取過患相——於所有諸相、尋思、隨煩惱取過患相。所謂『諸相』,是色等十相;『尋思』,是欲等八尋思;『隨煩惱』,是貪欲等五。你應於它們取過患相:這些相能令心作用遽務(忙亂),這些尋思能令心思慕躁擾,這些隨煩惱能令心恒不寂靜;心的忙亂是諸相所作、思慕躁擾是尋思所作、恒不寂靜是隨煩惱所作,由此令心苦惱而住。所以這些相、尋思、隨煩惱,是苦、非聖、能引無義,令心散動、躁擾、染污——你應這樣取過患相。又你應依心一境性、心安住性、心無亂性,以六種行正取其相:一無相想、二於無相中無作用想、三無分別想、四於無分別中無所思慕無躁擾想、五寂靜想、六於寂靜中離諸燒惱寂滅樂想。」

六種行也要逐項修取:第一,於所緣修無相想;第二,在無相之中修無作用想;第三,於所緣修無分別想;第四,在無分別之中修無所思慕、無躁擾想;第五,於所緣修寂靜想;第六,在寂靜之中修離諸燒惱的寂滅樂想。這六種行依次安立於心一境、心安住、心無亂的狀態。

貪行初修(五)取光明相·了別事相(青瘀)

「你取了過患相,又應數數取光明相——或燈明、或大火明、或日輪明、或月輪明。既取光明相,又應到塚間取青瘀相(廣說乃至取骨鎖相)。你若不能去塚間,就取彩畫、木、石所作的這些相。」

取了這相,回到住處——或阿練若、或林樹下、或空閑室、或大床、小繩床、草葉座——先洗了足,結跏趺坐、端身正願、安住背念,先於一境令心不散、繫念在前;又於其中依六種想作意思惟:無相想、無分別想、寂靜想、無作用想、無所思慕無躁擾想、離諸燒惱寂滅樂想。

又於其中,你當審諦周遍了知「亂相、不亂相」分明現前。如此審諦周遍了知,你便能了知諸相、尋思、隨煩惱中的亂相,也能了知心一境性隨六想修的諸不亂相。又於這亂不亂相審諦了知,便能安住一所緣境、安住內心寂止,諸心相續、流注,前後一味,無相、無分別,寂靜而轉。

又若你心雖得寂止,由失念、及由久習諸相尋思隨煩惱的過失,那些境像如鏡中面、所緣影像數數現前;隨它生起,就於其中再修「不念作意」——由先所見的過患相增上力,於這所緣境相,由所修的不念作意除遣散滅,令它畢竟不現在前。賢首當知!這所緣甚為微細、難可通達,你應發起猛利樂欲、為求通達而發勤精進。

油鉢喻:四念住的專注(世尊密意說)

世尊依這所緣境相,密意說過這樣的話——

「諸位苾芻,當知『眾善』:所謂在大眾集會中那盛壯的美色;這眾善裡最殊勝的,是大集會中的歌舞倡伎。假使有一智慧丈夫從外面來,告訴一個人:『咄哉男子!你今者,可端著這滿滿一鉢油、莫令灩溢,經過這大眾中間走過;要避開其間所有眾善、及最勝的歌舞倡伎、大等生等。如今有一魁膾(劊子手),露拔利劍跟在你後面走——你若鉢油一滴墮地,這魁膾就以利劍當斬你首、斷你命根。』苾芻!你們意下如何?這持鉢人,難道會不專心顧那油鉢、那拔劍的魁膾、那不平的地,反去注意看那眾善、最勝歌舞倡伎大等生嗎?」「不也,世尊!為什麼?這持鉢人既見魁膾露拔利劍跟著走,極大怖畏,只專作這念:我端的鉢油已滿,過這大眾極難將度,萬一一滴墮地,定被這拔劍魁膾斬首斷命;他那時,對那眾善及最勝歌舞倡伎大等生等,都不作意、不思念、不觀視,唯於油鉢專心作意而正護持。」

「如是苾芻!我諸弟子恭敬殷重、專心憶念修四念住,當知也是這樣。」——〔此喻的對應:〕「眾善」喻能隨順貪欲纏等隨煩惱法;其中「最勝歌舞倡伎」喻能隨順尋思戲論躁擾處法;「大等生等」喻色相等十種相法;「智慧丈夫」喻瑜伽師;「平滿油鉢」喻奢摩他所安住的心(能令身心輕安潤澤,是奢摩他義);「露拔利劍隨行的魁膾」喻先所取的諸相、尋思、隨煩惱中的諸過患相;「專心將護、不令鉢油一滴墮地」喻能審諦周遍了知亂不亂相所攝受的奢摩他道——由此能令諸心相續流注,由精進力無間策發,前後一味,無相、無分別,寂靜而轉,不再起一心又去緣諸相、或緣尋思隨煩惱。

善修奢摩他道·退則還取有分別相

這瑜伽師又應這樣慇懃教誨初修業者,告言:「賢首!你若這樣精勤修習奢摩他道,這樣方便、攝受正念正知俱行的有喜樂心,才名善修奢摩他道。若由久習過失,不能於中深心喜樂,要極大艱辛勵力策發才現前,就應速疾出『無分別所緣境相』,於『有分別所緣境相』繫念在前——像先前所取的諸不淨相。

勝解作意→真實作意(青瘀無量·脅山·苦邊際)

「你今又應作意思惟,先用『唯隨相行毘鉢舍那』,或觀青瘀、或觀膿爛(廣說乃至觀骨、觀鎖、或觀骨鎖)。你初修觀時,於一青瘀(乃至一骨鎖)當起勝解。若於其中已久習、觀道明淨、於所緣相明了勝解相續時,又應於二、三、四、五、十、二十、三十、四十、五十,或百青瘀、千青瘀,乃至一切諸方諸維所有青瘀,起無量行、遍一切處、無間的勝解——其中乃至沒有容受一根杖端的空處。如青瘀,乃至骨鎖也這樣。

「你依這勝解作意,應當趣入真實作意。趣入時應這樣想:如我今者勝解所作的無量青瘀(乃至無量骨鎖),真實的青瘀乃至骨鎖,其量還過於此、不可數知。為什麼?從前際以來,我於各各有、各各趣中輪迴生死,命終夭沒所棄的尸骸、所起的青瘀(乃至骨鎖),無量無邊;推它前際,不可知故。假使有人能把這些所棄尸骸聚起、令不壞爛,一切大地也容不下;單一劫中所棄的尸骸乃至骨鎖,假使斂在一處,其聚量大如廣大脅山。從前際如此,後際也如此,乃至還未能作苦的邊際。如此你依勝解作意,應當趣入真實作意。

「又修青瘀乃至骨鎖的毘鉢舍那,不應一下子頓觀——纔於一尸骸青瘀起勝解,隨即令心於內寂靜;乃至於這所緣境相喜樂明淨、無諸擾惱、不必勉強用力,這麼點工夫裡,應於這尸骸青瘀發起勝解。若纔於此、乃至勵力方現前,那時就於內修寂靜。如青瘀,乃至骨鎖也這樣;由這道理乃至無量,也這樣。如此令心內寂靜了,又應發起『寂靜勝解』——從最後無量青瘀、乃至最後無量骨鎖,內略其心、方便除遣,安置於『眾相不顯現』中:不全棄捨有分別相,也不分別,唯即於這所緣安住其心,無相、無分別,寂靜而轉。」

光明想修止觀·依不淨觀趣入四念住

那瑜伽師又應教授,告言:「賢首!你先所取的諸光明相,於奢摩他品加行、毘鉢舍那品加行中,都應作意、如理思惟。你若能以光明俱心、照了俱心、明淨俱心、無闇俱心修止修觀,這才名於止觀道修光明想。若最初於所緣境多不分明、數習勝解而其相闇昧,後修的勝解也不分明,雖多串習而相闇昧;若最初於所緣境多分分明、數習勝解而其相明了,後修的轉復分明,雖少串習而相明了。如此你由善取厭離相、欣樂相、奢摩他相、毘鉢舍那相、光明相故——」

於時時中內以寂靜,於時時中由隨相行毘鉢舍那思擇諸法;即於不淨正修加行的增上力,於諸念住漸次趣入。將趣入時,你應先於內身所有三十六物(始從髮毛乃至小便)善取其相,先發起不淨勝解,數數發起後復令心於內寂靜——這名為「於內身修循身觀」(依自身內而起)。次應於外諸不淨物善取其相,發起青瘀勝解(乃至骨鎖勝解;或狹小、或廣大、或無量勝解),數數發起後復令心內寂靜——這名「於外身修循身觀」(依他外身而起)。後又於自身內外諸不淨物善取其相令心明了,又於他身內外不淨善取其相令心明了;於自所愛,當發起這勝解:他死後出送塚間、棄之在地、至青瘀位、膿爛位(乃至骨鎖位)發起勝解,數數發起後復令心內寂靜——這名「於內外身修循身觀」(依自他身若內若外而起)。

你又應於四無色蘊,由聞思增上力分別取相,於其三分發起勝解:一於奢摩他品、二於無散亂品、三於毘鉢舍那品。奢摩他品:你心於內略時,起無相、無分別、寂靜想行,及無作用、無思慕無躁動、離諸燒惱寂滅樂想行;於所緣無亂的受等四無色蘊,剎那剎那展轉別異、唯是新新而非故故、相續流轉,你應如理思惟、發起勝解——這名「於內受心法修循受心法觀」。無散亂品:你於先所取、所緣而墮不定地、過去盡滅、及今失念心亂所生的諸相尋思隨煩惱境的增上受等四無色蘊,應如理作意:這些法其性皆是誑幻所作、暫時而有、率爾現前、多諸過患、其性無常、不可保信,你應這樣發起勝解——這名「於外受心法修循受心法觀」。毘鉢舍那品:你善取毘鉢舍那相後,住有相有分別作意,於有分別有相所緣增上內所生的受等四無色蘊,如理作意思惟此法剎那剎那展轉別異、唯是新新而非故故、相續流轉,如前發起勝解——這名「於內外受心法修循受心法觀」。

如此你由依不淨觀正修加行的增上力,於四念住當得趣入。

念住中的乞食威儀·應量語·恒常畢竟作·願心

「又你應於念住加行,時時修習勝奢摩他、毘鉢舍那。你於這四念住中安住正念,隨依各各村邑聚落邊際而住。當你的心隨順、趣向、臨入所緣境界時,你應捨此所緣境相、入彼村邑乞食;應當善避惡象、惡馬、惡牛、惡狗、惡蛇、惡獸、坑澗濠塹、株杌、毒刺、泥水、糞穢,並遠離諸惡威儀、穢坐臥具——你應這樣善護己身。若於那些境界相不應策發諸根,你就不作功用、善守諸根;若應當策發諸根,你就正作功用、善住正念,令煩惱不起現行。你應這樣善護己身、善守諸根、善住正念,於彼作意,善知其量受用飲食。又你應與在家、出家者說應量語、應理語、應時語、正直語、寂靜語;一切世間非法言論皆當遠離。雖說如法言論,也不應諍競。為什麼?若有人住諍競語、互相難詰,其心便住多戲論中;多戲論故心掉舉,心掉舉故心不寂靜,不寂靜故便令其心遠離三摩地。這樣行過之後,你應速疾不捨所緣,結跏趺坐,於止觀如所取相,由『恒常作』及『畢竟作』修瑜伽行——猶如世間鑽火的方便(不停手才生火),起無間加行及殷重加行,你應這樣恒常修作、畢竟修作。

五種言語也要逐項實行:說話知所應有的分量,名為應量語;說話與正理相應,名為應理語;在適當時機才說,名為應時語;說話不諂不曲,名為正直語;說話能令自他心離躁擾,名為寂靜語。凡屬世間而不合正法的言論,一概遠離;即使宣說如法言論,也不得以諍競難詰的方式宣說。

「又你應起這樣的願心:假使一切贍部洲人、盡贍部洲曾經的壽量,今都總集在我一身,我也盡這無量壽命,決定於斷瑜伽作意、勝止勝觀精勤修習,時無暫捨——因為正了知這樣所修的瑜伽加行有大勝果、大勝利。何況我這少分壽量、少時存活,縱極遠也不過百年,仔細算來不過須臾頃。如此你應隨所教誨,恒常修作、畢竟修作。若為此義受習於『斷』,你於此義必當獲得:你當最初證得下劣的身心輕安、心一境性,後當證得世出世間廣大圓滿。」

初修業者起修時,善達瑜伽的師長依不淨觀這樣教誨,名「正教誨」;這樣修行,名「正修行」。

其餘四行的趣入門(慈愍·緣起·界差別·數息)

如說貪行由不淨觀調伏,瞋行由慈愍觀調伏,乃至最後尋思行由阿那波那念調伏,隨其所應都當了知。其中差別的「餘趣入門」,我今當顯示——

(一) 慈愍觀(瞋行):初修業者於外的親品、怨品、中庸品善取相後,如法而坐,由「利益安樂增上意樂」俱行的定地作意,先於一親、一怨、一中庸發起勝解;於這三品由平等的利益安樂意樂俱行作意,欲與其樂,這樣念:願那些求樂的有情皆當得樂——或無罪欲樂、或無罪有喜樂、或無罪無喜樂。次後或於二親、三親、四親、五親、十親、二十、三十,如前乃至遍諸方維,其中親品充滿無間發起勝解,乃至無有容受一杖端處;如於親品,於怨、中庸品也這樣。又他不捨慈愍加行,即由修這慈愍,於諸念住能正趣入。怎麼趣入?趣入時應發這勝解:如他於我謂親、謂怨、謂中庸,我既欲樂、厭背其苦——這名「於內身修循身觀」;其餘也於彼謂親謂怨謂中庸,如我,他也欲樂背苦——這名「於外身修循身觀」;如我既爾,彼諸有情亦如是,如我求得勝樂,彼亦如是,彼諸有情與己平等相似,我當與彼利益安樂——這名「於內外身修循身觀」。這四念住總緣諸蘊為境,當知名「壞緣念住」。  若修行者但取色相(顯相、形相、表相)於三品起勝解,由此建立「唯身念住」;他又依勝解作意能正趣入真實作意——趣入時起這勝解:我從先際以來,所有親品怨品中庸品落謝過去的有情,其數無量、甚過今者勝解所作;這些過去有情,為我親已復為我怨、為我怨已復為我親、為怨親已復為中庸、為中庸已復為怨親,由這義門,一切有情平等平等,無有少分真實的親性、怨性、中庸性,所以遍於三品起平等心、平等與利益安樂。從先際如此,後際於生死中當復流轉也這樣。又我於先際以來的有情未曾起慈愍,他們皆已過去,今起慈愍有何益?但為除遣自心垢穢、令得清淨,故起念言:當令過去諸有情皆得安樂、未來非曾有者亦皆當得安樂。如此趣入真實作意的慈愍住中,諸福滋潤、諸善滋潤;比起前修勝解作意慈愍住所獲的福聚,後者於百分不及此一、千分不及此一,乃至鄔波尼殺曇分不及此一(餘如前說)。

(二) 緣起觀(癡行):初修業者由聞思慧增上力分別取相——諸有情由種種無智愚癡,現見無常妄計為常、現見不淨妄計為淨、現見其苦妄計為樂、現見無我妄計為我,有這些顛倒;顛倒為因,於現法受及後所生的諸自體中發起貪愛;由貪愛造作種種生根本業;此煩惱、業為因緣,感得當來純大苦蘊。他善取相後,又於其內發起勝解:我今這純大苦蘊也這樣生,我自體無邊無際、從先際來初不可知也這樣生,彼諸有情去來現在一切自體皆苦蘊所攝、也都這樣已生當生。這緣性緣起正觀,一切皆是真實作意,更無所餘勝解作意。若於自身現在諸蘊作緣性緣生思惟,名「於內身受心法住彼循觀」;於他身,名「於外」;於自他過去未來諸蘊,名「於內外」(餘如前說)。

(三) 界差別觀(慢行):初修業者先取外的堅相——大地、山林、草木、塼石、瓦礫、末尼、真珠、琉璃、螺貝、珊瑚、玉等,取相後復於內堅起勝解。次取外的大水相——江河眾流、陂湖池沼井等,取後復於內濕起勝解。次取外的大火相——熱時烈日焚燒山澤、災火蔓延、窯室中諸火,取後復於內煗起勝解。次取外的大風相——東西南北等風乃至風輪,取後復於內風起勝解。次取外的大空相——諸方無障無礙、諸聚色中孔隙窟穴有所容受,善取後於內空界起勝解。後由聞思增上力起細分別、取識界相——內眼處不壞、外色處現前,若無能生作意正起,所生眼識亦不得生;與此相違,眼識得生(乃至意、法、意識也這樣)。取相後次起勝解,了知這四大身中有一切識的諸種子、界、種性、自性。  又於四大種中,先起支節麁大勝解,後起分析種種細分的微細勝解,如此漸次分析乃至向遊塵量、乃至極微而起勝解;一一支分尚起無量極微塵積集勝解,何況身中一切支分——這名界差別觀中「分析諸色界差別邊際」的微細勝解。次於空界,先發起麁大空界勝解(眼耳鼻喉筒等種種竅穴,由是吞咽、下分不淨流出),次漸發起微細勝解,乃至身中一切微細毛孔穴皆悉了知。後於識界,漸發起所依、所緣、及作意三世時分品類差別的無量勝解;即於識界起勝解時,由諸所依所緣勝解分析識界,也於十種所造諸色起勝解(如諸大種微細分析,此亦如是)。若於自身各別諸界起勝解,名「於內念住住彼循觀」;於非有情數諸界,名「於外」;於餘有情數諸界,名「於內外」。  又有「異門」:於己身起勝解——臨捨命時(如前廣說至青瘀位、或膿爛位),即於膿爛發起種種流出勝解,漸漸膿流展轉增廣、乃至大海大地邊際膿悉充滿;發起膿勝解後,次發起火燒勝解(此身分無量無邊品類差別,為大火聚無量無邊品類燒燼);火滅後復起餘骨餘灰勝解,又起無量勝解碎此骨灰為細末,又起無量大風勝解飄散此末遍諸方維;既飄散已,不復見所飄灰骨及能飄風,唯觀有餘渺茫空界。如此由勝解作意,依內外不淨加行入界差別,於身相住循身觀,從是趣入真實作意——由這勝解作意於內外身住循身觀,由勝解力知我所作的無量無邊水火地風空界相,比我從無始生死流轉所經的諸界(無量無邊、甚過於此):謂由父母兄弟姊妹眷屬喪亡、親友財寶祿位離散,悲泣雨淚;又飲母乳;又由作賊擁逼劫掠、穿牆解結,遭無量度截手刖足斬頭劓鼻、種種解割身節,血流無量。如此所有淚乳血所攝的水界水聚,四大海水皆盈滿也於百分不及其一(廣說如前)。又於諸趣死生經無量火焚燒尸骸,那火聚也無比;又經無量棄捨骸骨狼籍在地、無量風界生滅分析尸骸,也無比;又經無量尸骸中眼等竅穴、無量諸識流轉,後後尸骸新新發起、乃至今者最後尸骸諸識流轉。如此安立後際諸趣,期限無定,乃至無量識界。

(四) 阿那波那念(尋思行):初修業者先於舍宅前後窗門、或打鐵師、或鍛金銀師的吹筒橐袋、或風從外聚入出往來善取相後,由緣內入出息念,於入出息起勝解。他先於微細的息風經心胸處麁穴往來起勝解,然後漸於眾多風起勝解(乃至一切毛孔風皆隨入而起勝解);如此一切身分為風聚所隨、所攝、所藏,無量風聚於中積集,如妬羅綿(兜羅綿)、或疊絮等輕飄物,於這些相起勝解。他若於內入息出息流轉不絕作意思惟,名「於內身住循身觀」;若於他死尸骸青瘀等位入出息流轉斷絕作意思惟,名「於外身住循身觀」;若於自臨欲死時起勝解、或於已死入出息無流轉起勝解、或於未死入出息無流轉起勝解(由法爾故),名「於內外身住循身觀」。

遍於一切正加行中,應修這樣「止品助伴、止品所攝」的無倒加行;其餘一切,如前應知。

熾然·正知具念·調伏世間貪憂

如此一切初修業者,蒙正教誨修正行時,安住「熾然、正知具念、調伏一切世間貪憂」。若於正加行中恒常作、畢竟作、無倒作意,非諠鬧等所能動亂,名「熾然」;若於正加行中修止觀、審諦了知亂不亂相,名「正知具念」;若能善取諸厭離相、欣樂相,名「調伏一切世間貪憂」。由這因緣,說他能安住熾然、乃至調伏世間貪憂。

作意成就:身心輕安生起·名「有作意」

先發這正加行時,心一境性、身心輕安還微劣而轉、難可覺了;後由修勝止勝觀,身心澄淨、調柔、輕安,那先前微劣的心一境性、身心輕安便漸更增長,能引強盛、易可覺了的心一境性、身心輕安——由因力展轉引發的方便道理,他那時不久當起強盛易了的身心輕安、心一境性。

如此乃至有那「前相」:於頂上似有重物而起,卻不是損惱之相。即由這相在內生起,能障樂斷諸煩惱品的「心麁重性」皆得除滅,能對治它的「心調柔性、心輕安性」皆得生起;由此生起,有隨順生身輕安的「風大偏增」的眾多大種來入身中,因這大種入身,能障樂斷諸煩惱品的「身麁重性」皆得除遣,能對治它的「身調柔性、身輕安性」遍滿身中、狀如充溢。它初起時令心踊躍、悅豫、歡喜俱行,令心喜樂的所緣境性於心中現;從此以後,那初起的輕安勢力漸漸舒緩,有微妙輕安隨身而行、在身中轉——由是心的踊躍性漸次退減,由奢摩他所攝持,心於所緣寂靜行轉。

從此以後,這初修業者名「有作意」,始得墮在「有作意」之數。為什麼?由他最初獲得了色界定地所攝的少分微妙正作意,由這因緣名「有作意」。

得這作意的初修業者,有這樣的相狀:已獲得色界所攝的少分定心、少分身心輕安、心一境性,有力有能善修「淨惑所緣」加行,令心相續滋潤而轉,為奢摩他所攝護、能淨諸行;雖行種種可愛境中,猛利的貪纏也不生起,縱少生起,依少分微劣對治、暫一作意即能除遣(如可愛境,可憎、可愚、可生憍慢、可尋思的境也這樣);宴坐靜室、暫持其心,身心輕安疾疾生起,不極為身麁重性所逼惱、不極數起諸蓋現行、不極現行思慕不樂憂慮俱行的諸想作意;雖從定起、出外經行,也有少分輕安餘勢隨身心轉——這些類,當知名為「有作意者」的清淨相狀。

The framework of cultivating attention has been set up; this closing leaf brings the whole teaching of tranquillity-and-insight down onto a single person who has only just set out on the road: how the teacher instructs the beginner in practice to take up five signs, and step by step to move from world-weariness to gladness, to gauge the mind with the sign of danger and the sign of light, and, relying on the contemplation of the impure, to enter the four foundations of mindfulness; midway, by the "simile of the oil-bowl" (which the World-Honored One spoke with hidden intent) it displays the one-pointed attentiveness of the four foundations of mindfulness; then, once greed-conduct has been fully treated, the four practices — loving-kindness, dependent origination, the differentiation of elements, and mindfulness of breathing — are each given their own gate of entry; and finally it speaks of "the accomplishment of attention" — how bodily and mental pliancy grows from faint and feeble to strong and vigorous, so that the practitioner first comes to be called "one who possesses attention" and falls into the number of those who possess attention. Only here does the cultivation of the Third Yoga-Station truly touch the ground. Rendered clause by clause into present-day language following Xuanzang's translation, keeping the old technical terms, adding no doctrine, citing no treatise, glossing no Sanskrit; where the treatise-text is compressed, it is filled back in with 〔 〕.

The Beginner in Practice Begins Cultivation: First Take Up the Five Signs

This is the third part of the Third Yoga-Station in the thirteenth division, the Śrāvaka Stage, within the Basic Section.

What is it for the beginner in practice, when he first begins to cultivate, to establish the cultivation of attention as fitting, to practice rightly according to what has been established, and so, for the very first time, to touch and realize the "one-pointedness of mind that is the severing-joy"?

The teacher, well versed in yoga, first instructs the beginner in practice in this way: "Welcome, worthy friend! You, now, should take up five signs by the threefold occasion of taking up signs — whether by seeing, or by hearing, or by the mind's comparative reckoning and heightened discernment: first, the sign of world-weariness; second, the sign of gladness; third, the sign of danger; fourth, the sign of light; and fifth, the sign of discerning things."

The three occasions for taking up signs are to be understood one by one: when the object has been personally seen, one takes up its sign by "seeing"; when the object has been heard from another, one takes up its sign by "hearing"; when it is neither presently seen nor presently heard but is comparatively reckoned in the mind, one takes up its sign by "the mind's comparative reckoning and heightened discernment." By these three occasions, each of the five — the sign of world-weariness, gladness, danger, light, and discerning things — can become a sign taken up by the beginner in practice.

Question: If the beginner in practice is a person of greed-conduct, who ought properly to be subdued by the contemplation of the impure, why is he taught to take up these five signs? Answer: He should be instructed in this way —

Greed-Conduct's First Cultivation (One): Taking Up the Sign of World-Weariness

"Welcome, worthy friend! In whatever village or settlement you dwell, if you hear of some other village where there are men and women who first enjoyed comfort and later met with misery; or where those men and women themselves fell into grave illness and, at the end of life, perished; or where their friends, relatives, and dependents met with such suffering; or where that settlement lost its wealth and treasure — whether seized by a strong enemy who came against it, or burned by fire, or swept away by water, or lost through blundering, or lost through poor management of affairs, or lost through poor disposition of affairs, or lost when someone took advantage in the matter of shared property, or lost through fire in the household. If you saw it yourself and did not merely hear it reported; or it was in this very village and not some other; or it was not some other village and not another person but your very own self — where the fierce and keen pleasant feeling you had tasted before was afterwards lost again (as explained at length before). Having heard it, having seen it, you should give rise to a deep world-weariness and distress: this birth-and-death is truly heavy suffering, the body one obtains is gotten with vast hardship, and yet within it there are just these many differences of decline, one's own and others' — the decline of health, the decline of lifespan, the decline of kin, the decline of wealth; there is illness and the nature-that-is-liable-to-illness, there is death and the nature-that-is-liable-to-death; and there is a further kind, the decline of pure discipline and the decline of right view. By these causes, those beings, in the present life, dwell amid manifold sufferings and torments, and in the life to come go on to the evil destinies. As for those who flourish — though in the present life they dwell in comfort, and in the life to come go on to the good destinies, still it is impermanent; and this impermanence can be realized here and now: whoever receives flourishing, for him decline will surely come to pass in the after-time; whoever receives decline, for him flourishing can hardly come to pass in the after-time. Matters of flourishing are all things hard to get and easy to break. Thus should you, with deep mind, be world-weary and distressed, attend to it most well, and hold it in accordance with principle: a place such as this can hardly be trusted. I, now, in this flowing-round of birth-and-death, have not yet reached final nirvāṇa, have not yet liberated my mind — hardly to be trusted. May these two things, decline and flourishing, not appear before me; may they not, on their account, cause me to fall into such a place and give rise to fierce, harsh, bitter, disagreeable suffering. By the very force of this matter, may I with utmost sincerity delight in severing and cultivate non-negligence; and by dwelling much in this way, may I be able to make an end of the meaningless. Thus should you attend most well and hold it in accordance with principle."

Greed-Conduct's First Cultivation (Two): Taking Up the Sign of Gladness

"Having taken up the sign of world-weariness, you should further diligently take up the sign of gladness. You should examine for yourself the discipline (śīla) you have received: is it well purified, or is it not purified? Perhaps through loss of mindfulness, or through lack of reverence, or through many afflictions, or through not knowing, I have committed some transgression against the trainings; and having transgressed, I shall, in accordance with the Dharma, by my own intrinsic heightened resolve, give rise to a deep mind toward the trainings and transgress no further — doing what is to be done and not doing what is not to be done; in brief, toward the trainings I shall bring the heightened resolve to fullness and bring all preparatory effort to fullness. When you examine rightly in this way, if you know for yourself that your body of discipline is pure — even though you do not deliberately make the thought 'I shall give rise to pure non-regret,' still, as a matter of course, one whose discipline is pure will surely give rise to this pure non-regret; and having given rise to non-regret, even though you do not deliberately make the thought 'I give rise to gladness,' still, as a matter of course, one who is without regret will surely give rise to gladness. Thus, first, at one kind of basis-of-gladness, you should give rise to the gladness whose forerunner is non-regret. And at the joy-place of the 'removal of hindrances,' you should give rise to joy — thinking: my discipline is now pure, I have the strength and the capacity to dwell in the trainings laid down by the World-Honored One, and in the present life I can attain what was not attained, touch what was not touched, realize what was not realized. From this place there arises a mind of joy. And if you obtain some slight difference of the earlier and later that you have realized, then by this very force, toward the perfect realization of others (such as the Tathāgatas, or the noble disciples) and toward your own later difference of realization, you should give rise to conviction and give rise to a mind of joy. These agreeable minds were first named gladness and are now named joy, and together are named delight of mind. This is called taking up the sign of gladness."

Greed-Conduct's First Cultivation (Three): The Instruction — Tempering and Moistening; Dwelling in Inward Even Abiding

Having taken up this sign, he should further be instructed, being told: "Worthy friend! By this sign of world-weariness you temper your mind, and by this sign of gladness you moisten your mind; toward the severing and extinguishing of worldly greed and grief you should dwell much. In each and every object-domain, diligently cultivate preparatory effort — whether of the tranquillity (śamatha) side or of the insight (vipaśyanā) side; and upon that very object let the mind abide inwardly and abide evenly. You will attain bodily and mental pliancy, and one-pointedness."

Greed-Conduct's First Cultivation (Four): Taking Up the Sign of Danger · Taking Up the Sign by the Six Practices

"If you thus turn your back on the dark categories and turn toward the white categories, tempering the mind and moistening the mind, you should further, again and again, take up the sign of danger — taking up the sign of danger in all signs, discursive thoughts, and secondary afflictions. As for the 'signs,' they are the ten signs of visible form and the rest; as for 'discursive thoughts,' they are the eight discursive thoughts of desire and the rest; as for 'secondary afflictions,' they are the five, greed-desire and the rest. You should take up the sign of danger in them: these signs can make the mind hurried and busy in its functioning; these discursive thoughts can make the mind yearn and be agitated; these secondary afflictions can make the mind never quiet — the mind's busyness is the doing of the signs, the yearning and agitation are the doing of the discursive thoughts, the never-being-quiet is the doing of the secondary afflictions, and by this the mind dwells in torment. Therefore these signs, discursive thoughts, and secondary afflictions are suffering, are not noble, and can draw on the meaningless; they make the mind scattered, agitated, and defiled — thus should you take up the sign of danger. And you should, relying on the mind's one-pointedness, the mind's abiding-in-stability, and the mind's freedom-from-disturbance, take up the sign rightly by six practices: first, the notion of signlessness; second, in signlessness, the notion of no-functioning; third, the notion of non-discrimination; fourth, in non-discrimination, the notion of no-yearning-and-no-agitation; fifth, the notion of quietness; and sixth, in quietness, the notion of the bliss-of-extinction that is free of all burning torments."

The six practices are likewise to be taken up one by one: first, upon the object, the notion of signlessness; second, within signlessness, the notion of no-functioning; third, upon the object, the notion of non-discrimination; fourth, within non-discrimination, the notion of no-yearning and no-agitation; fifth, upon the object, the notion of quietness; sixth, within quietness, the notion of the bliss of extinction free of all burning torments. These six practices are established in order upon one-pointedness of mind, stability of mind, and freedom of mind from disturbance.

Greed-Conduct's First Cultivation (Five): Taking Up the Sign of Light · the Sign of Discerning Things (the Livid Corpse)

"Having taken up the sign of danger, you should further, again and again, take up the sign of light — the light of a lamp, or the light of a great fire, or the light of the disc of the sun, or the light of the disc of the moon. Having taken up the sign of light, you should further go to the charnel-ground and take up the sign of the livid corpse (as explained at length, down to taking up the sign of the chained skeleton). If you cannot go to the charnel-ground, then take up these signs as made in painting, wood, or stone."

Having taken up this sign, he returns to his dwelling-place — whether a wilderness hermitage, or the foot of a forest tree, or an empty quiet room, or a large bed, a small corded couch, a seat of grass and leaves — and having first washed his feet, he sits cross-legged, sets his body erect and his aspiration upright, and settles into keeping mindfulness before him; first, upon a single object he keeps the mind from scattering and ties his mindfulness before him; and within that he attends and reflects by six notions: the notion of signlessness, the notion of non-discrimination, the notion of quietness, the notion of no-functioning, the notion of no-yearning-and-no-agitation, and the notion of the bliss-of-extinction free of all burning torments.

And within that, you should thoroughly and comprehensively come to know the "sign of disturbance and the sign of non-disturbance" as they appear distinctly before you. Just so, thoroughly and comprehensively knowing, you will be able to know the disturbed signs among all signs, discursive thoughts, and secondary afflictions, and also able to know the various undisturbed signs of the mind's one-pointedness cultivated by way of the six notions. And thoroughly knowing this sign of disturbance and non-disturbance, you will be able to dwell upon a single object-domain and to dwell in inward mental tranquil-stilling, so that the mind's continuities and the mind's flowings-on, of one taste before and after, turn on signless, non-discriminating, and quiet.

And if your mind, though it has attained tranquil-stilling, on account of loss of mindfulness and the fault of long habituation to signs, discursive thoughts, and secondary afflictions, has those object-images appear again and again before it like a face in a mirror; then, as they arise, upon them you cultivate once more the "attention of non-attending" — by the force of the sign of danger seen before, upon this object-sign, by the cultivated attention of non-attending, you dispel and scatter them and make them, once and for all, not appear before you. Worthy friend, you should know: this object is exceedingly subtle and hard to penetrate. You should give rise to a fierce and keen delight and longing, and, in order to penetrate it, give rise to diligent effort.

The Simile of the Oil-Bowl: the One-Pointed Attentiveness of the Four Foundations of Mindfulness (Which the World-Honored One Spoke with Hidden Intent)

The World-Honored One, in reference to this object-sign, once spoke with hidden intent these words —

"Bhikṣus, you should know 'the crowd of fine things': namely, in a great assembly gathered together, the flush and vigorous beauties; and the most excellent among this crowd of fine things — the singing, dancing, and entertainments of that great gathering. Suppose there were a wise man who came from outside and said to a certain person: 'Hey there, man! You, now, are to carry this bowl brimful of oil and not let it spill over, and pass through the midst of this great crowd; and you must avoid all the fine things there, and the most excellent singing, dancing, and entertainments, the great and equal beings and the rest. Now there is an executioner following behind you with a bared, drawn, sharp sword — if a single drop of your oil falls to the ground, this executioner will, with the sharp sword, then and there cut off your head and sever your life-root.' Bhikṣus, what do you think? Would this bowl-bearing man, do you suppose, fail to attend with single mind to the oil-bowl, to the executioner with the drawn sword, and to the uneven ground, and instead be able to attend to and gaze upon the fine things and the most excellent singing, dancing, and entertainments and the great beings?" "No, World-Honored One! Why? This bowl-bearing man, having seen the executioner following with a bared, drawn, sharp sword, is in the greatest terror and singly makes just this thought: the oil-bowl I carry is already full, and to pass through this crowd is exceedingly hard to accomplish; should a single drop fall to the ground, I shall surely, by this sword-bearing executioner, have my head cut off and my life-root severed. That man, at that time, toward those fine things and the most excellent singing, dancing, and entertainments and the great beings and the rest, does not attend to them, think of them, or gaze upon them at all; only upon the oil-bowl does he attend with single mind and rightly guard it."

"So it is, bhikṣus! My disciples, who with reverence and gravity, single-minded and recollected, cultivate the four foundations of mindfulness — know that it is likewise." — 〔The correspondences of this simile:〕 "the crowd of fine things" is a simile for the secondary-affliction dharmas that conform to the entanglements of greed-desire and the rest; among them the "most excellent singing, dancing, and entertainments" is a simile for the dharmas that conform to the agitating places of discursive-thought and idle proliferation; "the great and equal beings and the rest" is a simile for the dharmas that are the ten signs of visible form and the rest; the "wise man" is a simile for the yoga practitioner; the "bowl brimful of oil" is a simile for the mind that is settled by tranquillity (śamatha) — that which can make body and mind pliant and moist, and this is the meaning of tranquillity; the "executioner following with a bared, drawn, sharp sword" is a simile for the signs of danger among the signs, discursive thoughts, and secondary afflictions taken up before; "singly guarding it, and not letting a single drop of the oil fall to the ground" is a simile for the path of tranquillity that is embraced by thoroughly and comprehensively knowing the signs of disturbance and non-disturbance — whereby the mind's continuities and flowings-on are, by the force of effort, roused on without interval, of one taste before and after, signless, non-discriminating, turning quiet, and never again arousing one thought that goes back to take signs as object, or discursive thoughts and secondary afflictions as object.

Well Cultivating the Path of Tranquillity · When It Recedes, Return to Taking Up the Discriminated Sign

This yoga practitioner should further, in this way, earnestly instruct the beginner in practice, being told: "Worthy friend! If you thus diligently cultivate the path of tranquillity, and by such skillful means take on a mind of joy accompanied by right mindfulness and right knowing — only then is it named well cultivating the path of tranquillity. If, on account of the fault of long habituation, you cannot deeply delight therein, and it comes before you only with the greatest hardship and forceful rousing, then you should swiftly come out of the 'object-sign that is non-discriminating' and tie your mindfulness before you upon the 'object-sign that is discriminating' — such as the signs of the impure taken up before.

Attention-by-Resolute-Conviction → Attention-by-the-Real (Boundless Livid Corpses · the Flanking Mountain · the Limit of Suffering)

"You, now, should further attend and reflect: first using that 'insight that merely operates along the signs,' contemplate the livid corpse, or contemplate the festering-and-rotting (as explained at length, down to contemplating the bone, contemplating the chain, or contemplating the chained skeleton). When you first cultivate this contemplation, upon a single livid corpse (down to a single chained skeleton) you should give rise to resolute conviction. If therein you have already long habituated it, the path of contemplation is bright and clear, and upon the object-sign your clear resolute conviction continues on, then you should further, upon two, three, four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, or a hundred livid corpses, a thousand livid corpses, down to all the livid corpses in every direction and quarter, give rise to a resolute conviction that operates boundlessly, pervades all places, and is without interval — within which there is not even the empty space to admit the tip of a single staff. As with the livid corpse, so down to the chained skeleton likewise.

"Relying on this attention-by-resolute-conviction, you should enter into attention-by-the-real. When you enter, you should think thus: just as the boundless livid corpses (down to boundless chained skeletons) that I now produce by resolute conviction, the real livid corpses down to chained skeletons are in their number still beyond this, past reckoning. Why? From the prior limit onward, in this or that existence and this or that destiny I have wheeled round in birth-and-death, and the corpses I have discarded at the end of life when I perished, the livid corpses I have raised (down to the chained skeletons), are boundless and without limit; and tracing their prior limit, it cannot be known. Suppose someone could gather up these discarded corpses and keep them from decaying and rotting — all the great earth still could not hold them; the corpses discarded, down to chained skeletons, in a single eon alone, suppose someone could pile them in one place, their heaped quantity would be as great as a vast flanking mountain. As it is from the prior limit, so too from the later limit, and even so I have not yet been able to make an end of suffering. Thus, relying on attention-by-resolute-conviction, you should enter into attention-by-the-real.

"Again, in cultivating the insight of the livid corpse down to the chained skeleton, you should not contemplate all at once — just as, upon a single corpse's livid state, you give rise to resolute conviction, right away you let the mind be inwardly quiet; down to the point where, toward this object-sign, there is joy and clarity, without any disturbance, and no need to force effort — in just this small span of work, you should give rise to resolute conviction upon this corpse's livid state. If it comes before you only when you force effort, then at that time you cultivate inward quietness. As with the livid corpse, so down to the chained skeleton likewise; and by this principle, down even to the boundless, likewise. Having thus let the mind be inwardly quiet, you should further give rise to a 'resolute conviction of quietness' — from the last of the boundless livid corpses down to the last of the boundless chained skeletons, you inwardly gather in your mind, by skillful means dispel them, and set them within the 'non-appearance of the crowd of signs': not wholly casting off the discriminated sign, yet not discriminating either, only, upon this very object, letting your mind abide — signless, non-discriminating, turning quiet."

Cultivating Tranquillity-and-Insight by the Notion of Light · Relying on the Contemplation of the Impure to Enter the Four Foundations of Mindfulness

That yoga practitioner should further instruct him, being told: "Worthy friend! The signs of light you took up before — in the preparatory effort of the tranquillity (śamatha) side and in the preparatory effort of the insight (vipaśyanā) side, you should in both attend to them and reflect in accordance with principle. If you can, with a mind together-with-light, a mind together-with-illumination, a mind together-with-clarity, a mind together-with-no-gloom, cultivate tranquillity and cultivate insight — only then is it named cultivating the notion of light on the path of tranquillity-and-insight. If, at the very first, upon the object-domain [the sign] is largely indistinct, and though you often habituate resolute conviction its sign is dim and dark, then the resolute conviction cultivated afterward is likewise indistinct — though you habituate it much, its sign is dim and dark. If, at the very first, upon the object-domain it is largely distinct, and habituating resolute conviction its sign is clear, then what is cultivated afterward turns still more distinct — though you habituate it little, its sign is clear. Thus it is because you have well taken up the sign of world-weariness, the sign of gladness, the sign of tranquillity, the sign of insight, and the sign of light —"

From time to time inwardly by quietness, and from time to time by the insight that operates along the signs discerning and examining dharmas; then, by the force of rightly cultivating the preparatory effort of the impure, you enter the foundations of mindfulness in gradual sequence. When about to enter, you should first, upon the thirty-six substances within your own body (beginning from the hair and body-hair down to the urine), well take up their sign, first giving rise to resolute conviction of the impure, and after giving rise to it again and again, further let the mind be inwardly quiet — this is called "cultivating the body-contemplation upon the inner body" (it is raised in dependence on one's own inner body). Next, upon the various outer impure things you should well take up their sign, giving rise to resolute conviction of the livid corpse (down to resolute conviction of the chained skeleton; whether a narrow, or a broad, or a boundless resolute conviction), and after giving rise to it again and again, further let the mind be inwardly quiet — this is called "cultivating the body-contemplation upon the outer body" (it is raised in dependence on another's outer body). Afterward, upon the various impure things both inner and outer of your own body you should well take up their sign and make the mind distinct, and further upon the inner and outer impurity of another's body well take up the sign and make the mind distinct; toward what you yourself love, you should give rise to this resolute conviction: after death it is sent out to the charnel-ground, discarded upon the ground, and reaches the livid state and the festering-and-rotting state (down to the chained-skeleton state) — give rise to resolute conviction, and after giving rise to it again and again, further let the mind be inwardly quiet — this is called "cultivating the body-contemplation upon the inner-and-outer body" (it is raised in dependence on one's own and another's body, whether inner or outer).

You should further, upon the four formless aggregates, by the force of hearing and reflection discriminate and take up the sign, and give rise to resolute conviction in three portions: first, the tranquillity (śamatha) side; second, the non-distraction side; third, the insight (vipaśyanā) side. The tranquillity side: when your mind inwardly gathers in, it gives rise to the practice of the notion of signlessness, non-discrimination, and quietness, and the practice of the notion of no-functioning, no-yearning-and-no-agitation, and the bliss-of-extinction free of all burning torments; and toward the undisturbed four formless aggregates — feeling and the rest — that take that object, instant by instant unfolding as distinct, being only ever new-and-new and not old-and-old, continuous and flowing on, you should reflect in accordance with principle and give rise to resolute conviction — this is called "cultivating the contemplation of feeling, mind, and dharmas upon inner feeling, mind, and dharmas." The non-distraction side: toward the four formless aggregates — feeling and the rest — heightened by the object-domains of signs, discursive thoughts, and secondary afflictions that arise from the objects taken up before and taken as object, which have fallen into the non-fixed ground, have passed away and ceased, and are now produced by the mind's disturbance through loss of mindfulness, you should attend in accordance with principle: these dharmas are all by nature made by deceptive illusion, exist but for a while, come before you abruptly, are full of dangers, are by nature impermanent, and cannot be trusted — thus should you give rise to resolute conviction — this is called "cultivating the contemplation of feeling, mind, and dharmas upon outer feeling, mind, and dharmas." The insight side: having well taken up the sign of insight, you dwell in the attention that has signs and has discrimination, and toward the four formless aggregates — feeling and the rest — heightened and inwardly produced upon the discriminated and sign-bearing object, you attend in accordance with principle and reflect that this dharma, instant by instant, unfolds as distinct, is only ever new-and-new and not old-and-old, continuous and flowing on, and, as said before, give rise to resolute conviction — this is called "cultivating the contemplation of feeling, mind, and dharmas upon inner-and-outer feeling, mind, and dharmas."

Thus, by the force of rightly cultivating the preparatory effort in dependence on the contemplation of the impure, you will attain entry into the four foundations of mindfulness.

Within the Foundations of Mindfulness: the Deportment of Alms-Gathering · Measured Speech · Constant and Final Practice · the Aspiring Mind

"You should further, in the preparatory effort of the foundations of mindfulness, from time to time cultivate the superior tranquillity and insight. Abiding in right mindfulness within these four foundations of mindfulness, you dwell according to the outskirts of this or that village and settlement. When your mind conforms to, tends toward, and is on the verge of entering the object-domain, you should relinquish this object-sign and enter that village to gather alms; you should well avoid vicious elephants, vicious horses, vicious oxen, vicious dogs, vicious snakes, vicious beasts, pits and ravines, moats and trenches, stumps and stakes, poisonous thorns, muddy water, and filth, and keep far from all bad deportment and defiled seats and bedding — thus should you well guard your own body. If toward those object-signs the faculties ought not to be roused, then you make no exertion and well guard the faculties; if the faculties ought to be roused, then you make right exertion, well abide in right mindfulness, and cause the afflictions not to arise and become active. Thus should you well guard your own body, well guard the faculties, and well abide in right mindfulness; attending therein, know well the measure of your use of food and drink. And you should, with householders and renunciants, speak measured speech, principled speech, timely speech, upright speech, and quiet speech; all worldly, non-Dharmic talk you should keep far away. Even when you set forth Dharmic talk, you should not wrangle in dispute. Why? If someone abides in disputatious speech, mutually challenging and refuting, his mind then dwells amid much idle proliferation; because of much idle proliferation the mind is agitated; because the mind is agitated the mind is not quiet; and because it is not quiet, it causes his mind to grow distant from concentration. Having so conducted yourself, you should swiftly, without relinquishing the object, sit cross-legged, and toward tranquillity-and-insight, according to the sign taken up, by 'constant practice' and 'final practice' cultivate the yoga-practice — just as, in the world, the skillful means of drilling for fire (only by not staying the hand does fire arise), giving rise to preparatory effort without interval and preparatory effort with gravity — thus should you constantly practice and finally practice.

The five kinds of speech are likewise to be practiced one by one: speech that knows the fitting measure is measured speech; speech that accords with right principle is principled speech; speech uttered only at the fitting occasion is timely speech; speech free of flattery and crookedness is upright speech; and speech that leaves one's own and another's mind free of agitation is quiet speech. Every worldly discourse that does not accord with Dharma is to be kept far away; even when one proclaims discourse in accord with Dharma, one must not proclaim it by wrangling and mutual challenge.

"And you should give rise to this aspiring mind: even if all the people of Jambudvīpa, and all the lifespans that Jambudvīpa has ever had, were now gathered together in my single body, I too, to the exhaustion of this boundless lifespan, would resolutely, in the yoga-attention of severing and in superior tranquillity and superior insight, diligently cultivate, at no moment briefly relinquishing — because I rightly know that yoga preparatory effort cultivated in this way has a great and excellent fruit and a great and excellent benefit. How much more so with this slight lifespan of mine, this brief span of living, which even at its furthest does not exceed a hundred years, and which, reckoned in detail, is but the space of an instant. Thus should you, according to what you have been instructed, constantly practice and finally practice. If for this purpose you take on the practice of 'severing,' you shall surely, for this purpose, attain: you shall at the very first realize the inferior bodily and mental pliancy and one-pointedness, and afterward realize the vast and perfect fulfilment, mundane and supramundane."

When the beginner in practice begins to cultivate, the teachers well versed in yoga instruct him in this way in dependence on the contemplation of the impure — this is named "right instruction"; and to practice in this way is named "right practice."

The Gates of Entry for the Remaining Four Practices (Loving-Kindness · Dependent Origination · the Differentiation of Elements · Mindfulness of Breathing)

Just as greed-conduct is subdued by the contemplation of the impure, so hatred-conduct is subdued by the contemplation of loving-kindness, down to the last, discursive-thought conduct, which is subdued by mindfulness of breathing (ānāpāna-smṛti); each should be understood according to what is fitting. As for the differing "remaining gates of entry" among them, I shall now display —

(One) The Contemplation of Loving-Kindness (Hatred-Conduct): The beginner in practice, having well taken up the sign of the outer category of the dear, category of the hostile, and category of the neutral, sits in accordance with the Dharma, and by an attention on the fixed ground accompanied by the heightened resolve of benefit-and-comfort, first gives rise to resolute conviction toward one dear person, one hostile person, and one neutral person; toward these three categories, by an attention accompanied by an even resolve of benefit-and-comfort, he wishes to give them happiness, thinking thus: may those sentient beings who seek happiness all attain happiness — whether blameless desire-happiness, or blameless happiness-with-joy, or blameless happiness-without-joy. Next, toward two dear persons, three dear persons, four dear persons, five dear persons, ten dear persons, twenty, thirty, as before down to pervading every direction and quarter, wherein the category of the dear is filled without interval, he gives rise to resolute conviction, down to there being not even the space to admit the tip of a single staff; as with the category of the dear, so too with the categories of the hostile and the neutral. And, not relinquishing the effort of loving-kindness, by this very cultivation of loving-kindness he is able rightly to enter the foundations of mindfulness. How does he enter? When he enters, he should give rise to this resolute conviction: just as, toward me, they are called dear, called hostile, called neutral, and I therefore wish happiness and turn my back on their suffering — this is named "cultivating the body-contemplation upon the inner body"; the rest too, toward those called dear, called hostile, called neutral — as I do, so they too wish happiness and turn their backs on suffering — this is named "cultivating the body-contemplation upon the outer body"; as I am so, those sentient beings are likewise, and as I seek to attain superior happiness, they too are likewise, and those sentient beings are equal and similar to myself, so I shall give them benefit-and-comfort — this is named "cultivating the body-contemplation upon the inner-and-outer body." These four foundations of mindfulness, taking the aggregates as a whole for their object-domain, should be known as named "the foundation of mindfulness by the destructuring object."  If the practitioner takes up only the sign of visible form (the manifest sign, the shape-sign, the expressive sign) and gives rise to resolute conviction toward the three categories, by this he establishes "the foundation of mindfulness of body alone"; and, relying further on attention-by-resolute-conviction, he is able rightly to enter attention-by-the-real — when he enters he gives rise to this resolute conviction: from the prior limit onward, the sentient beings of the category of the dear, category of the hostile, and category of the neutral who have fallen away into the past are without number, far surpassing what is now produced by resolute conviction; these past sentient beings, having been my dear ones, became again my hostile ones; having been my hostile ones, became again my dear ones; having been hostile and dear, became again neutral; having been neutral, became again hostile and dear — by this gateway of meaning, all sentient beings are equal, equal, without the least real quality of dearness, hostility, or neutrality; therefore, pervading the three categories, he gives rise to an even mind and evenly gives benefit-and-comfort. As it is from the prior limit, so from the later limit he will again wheel round in birth-and-death, likewise. And toward the sentient beings from the prior limit onward, I have never given rise to loving-kindness; they have all passed away — what benefit is there now in giving rise to loving-kindness? It is only to dispel the defilement of my own mind and make it attain purity; therefore he gives rise to the thought: may all past sentient beings attain comfort, and may those of the future who have never yet been also all attain comfort. Thus, entering into attention-by-the-real, within the abiding of loving-kindness there is the moistening of all merits and the moistening of all wholesome things; compared with the store of merit obtained in the abiding of loving-kindness by attention-by-resolute-conviction cultivated before, the latter does not equal one part in a hundred of this, does not equal one part in a thousand of this, down to not equaling one part in an upaniṣad-fraction of this (the rest as said before).

(Two) The Contemplation of Dependent Origination (Delusion-Conduct): The beginner in practice, by the force of the wisdom of hearing and reflection, discriminates and takes up the sign — sentient beings, by all manner of not-knowing (ajñāna) and delusion, seeing the impermanent falsely reckon it as permanent, seeing the impure falsely reckon it as pure, seeing what is suffering falsely reckon it as happiness, seeing the non-self falsely reckon it as self, having these inversions; with inversion as cause, toward the feeling in the present life and the various bodily-existences produced afterward, they give rise to craving; by craving they perform all manner of root-karma of birth; and with this affliction and karma as cause and condition, they draw down the whole great mass of suffering to come. Having well taken up the sign, he further within gives rise to resolute conviction: this whole great mass of suffering of mine, too, is thus produced; my bodily existence is boundless and limitless, from the prior limit its beginning cannot be known, thus produced; and the past, future, and present bodily existences of all those sentient beings, subsumed under the mass of suffering, have too all thus been produced and will be produced. This right contemplation of other-dependent nature and dependent-origination is wholly attention-by-the-real, with no remaining attention-by-resolute-conviction. If, upon your own body's present aggregates, you attend and reflect by other-dependent nature and dependent-arising, it is named "abiding in that following contemplation upon the inner body, feeling, mind, and dharmas"; upon another's body, it is named "upon the outer"; upon your own and another's past and future aggregates, it is named "upon the inner-and-outer" (the rest as said before).

(Three) The Contemplation of the Differentiation of Elements (Pride-Conduct): The beginner in practice first takes up the outer sign of solidity — the great earth, mountains and forests, grass and trees, brick and stone, tile and gravel, maṇi-gems, pearl, lapis lazuli, conch and shell, coral, jade, and the rest — and having taken up the sign, further gives rise to resolute conviction toward inner solidity. Next he takes up the outer sign of great water — rivers, streams, the many flowing waters, ponds, lakes, pools, marshes, wells, and the rest — and having taken it up, further gives rise to resolute conviction toward inner wetness. Next he takes up the outer sign of great fire — in the hot season the blazing sun scorching mountains and marshes, calamity-fire spreading and creeping, the various fires in kilns and chambers — and having taken it up, further gives rise to resolute conviction toward inner warmth. Next he takes up the outer sign of great wind — the winds of east, west, south, north, and the rest, down to the wind-disc — and having taken it up, further gives rise to resolute conviction toward inner wind. Next he takes up the outer sign of great space — the directions being without obstruction and without hindrance, the crevices and hollows within the aggregations of matter having capacity to admit — and having well taken up the sign of space, gives rise to resolute conviction toward the inner space-element. Afterward, by the force of hearing and reflection he raises a fine discrimination and takes up the sign of the consciousness-element — the inner eye-base being unimpaired, the outer form-base being present, if there is no productive attention properly arising, then the eye-consciousness to be produced also cannot arise; contrary to this, the eye-consciousness arises (down to mind, dharmas, and mental consciousness likewise). Having taken up the sign, he next gives rise to resolute conviction, knowing that within this body of four great elements there are the seeds, the elements, the lineage, and the intrinsic nature of all consciousness.  And within the four great elements, he first gives rise to a coarse resolute conviction of the limbs and joints, and afterward gives rise to a subtle resolute conviction analyzing the various fine portions, thus in gradual sequence analyzing down to the measure of a floating mote, down to the subtlest particle, giving rise to resolute conviction; toward each single limb-part he still gives rise to the resolute conviction of a boundless heap of subtlest particles piled together, how much more so all the limb-parts within the body — this is named, within the contemplation of the differentiation of elements, the subtle resolute conviction that "analyzes the differentiation of the form-elements to their limit." Next, toward the space-element, he first gives rise to the coarse resolute conviction of the space-element (the eye, ear, nose, throat-tube, and the various openings and hollows, whereby there is swallowing and whereby the lower impure part flows out), then gradually gives rise to a subtle resolute conviction, down to knowing fully all the subtle pores and hollows within the body. Afterward, toward the consciousness-element, he gradually gives rise to boundless resolute conviction of the differentiations of the support, the object, and attention across the three-time divisions and classes; that is, when he gives rise to resolute conviction toward the consciousness-element, by the resolute convictions of the supports and objects he analyzes the consciousness-element, and also gives rise to resolute conviction toward the ten kinds of derived form (as with the fine analysis of the great elements, so too here). If toward the several elements of one's own body he gives rise to resolute conviction, it is named "abiding in that following contemplation upon the inner foundations of mindfulness"; toward the elements of the non-sentient class, it is named "upon the outer"; toward the elements of other sentient beings, it is named "upon the inner-and-outer."  And there is a "further approach": toward one's own body he gives rise to resolute conviction — at the time of relinquishing life (as explained at length before, down to the livid state, or the festering-and-rotting state), then upon the festering-and-rotting he gives rise to the resolute conviction of all manner of outflow, the pus-flow gradually and successively spreading wider, down to the great sea and the limits of the great earth being wholly filled with pus; and having given rise to the resolute conviction of pus, he next gives rise to the resolute conviction of fire-burning (this body-part of boundless, limitless kinds and classes being burned to cinders by a great mass of fire of boundless, limitless kinds and classes); and after the fire is extinguished, he further gives rise to the resolute conviction of remaining bone and remaining ash, and further gives rise to boundless resolute conviction that grinds this bone-ash into fine powder, and further gives rise to the resolute conviction of a boundless great wind that scatters this powder to pervade every direction and quarter; and once it is scattered, he no longer sees the scattered ash and bone or the scattering wind, but contemplates only a remaining vast and dim space-element. Thus, by attention-by-resolute-conviction, relying on the preparatory effort of the impure both inner and outer, he enters the differentiation of elements, abides in the body-contemplation upon the body-sign, and from this enters attention-by-the-real — for by this attention-by-resolute-conviction, abiding in the body-contemplation upon the inner-and-outer body, by the force of resolute conviction he knows: the boundless, limitless signs of the water-element, fire-element, earth-element, wind-element, and space-element that I have made, compared with the various elements I have passed through wheeling round in birth-and-death from beginningless time (boundless, limitless, far surpassing this) — namely, by the death of parents, brothers, sisters, kin, and dependents, and by the parting and ruin of friends, wealth, and rank, weeping tears like rain; and again drinking mother's milk; and again by acting as a robber, coercing, plundering, breaking through walls and undoing knots, undergoing boundless times of having hands cut off, feet severed, head decapitated, nose sliced off, and the joints of the body all manner of dismembered and cleaved, blood flowing boundlessly. Thus all the water-element and heap of water subsumed under these tears, milk, and blood — the waters of the four great seas, though wholly filled, do not equal one part in a hundred of it (as explained at length before). And through the deaths and births in the various existences and destinies I have passed through, boundless fire has burned the corpses, and that mass of fire too is beyond compare; and I have passed through boundless discarded skeletons strewn upon the ground, and through boundless wind-elements arising and ceasing, analyzing the corpses, too beyond compare; and I have passed through the boundless eye-openings and the rest among the corpses, and through boundless consciousnesses flowing on, later and later corpses newly and newly raised, down to this present last corpse and the consciousnesses flowing on. Thus, establishing the destinies of the later limit, whose term is indefinite, down to the boundless consciousness-element.

(Four) Mindfulness of Breathing (Discursive-Thought Conduct): The beginner in practice first, upon the windows and doors before and behind a house, or the bellows-tube and sack of a blacksmith or a gold- and silver-smith, or the wind gathering outside and going in and out, coming and going, having well taken up the sign, by mindfulness of the inner in-breath and out-breath gives rise to resolute conviction toward the in-breath and out-breath. He first, upon the subtle breath-wind passing to and fro at the coarse hollow of the heart-and-chest region, gives rise to resolute conviction, and then gradually gives rise to resolute conviction toward the many winds (down to the winds of all the pores, each following as they enter, giving rise to resolute conviction); thus all the body-parts are followed by, embraced by, and stored-hidden by heaps of wind, and boundless heaps of wind are piled up therein, like tūla-cotton (kapok-down), or wadding and floss and such light floating things — toward these signs he gives rise to resolute conviction. If, upon the inner in-breath and out-breath flowing on unbroken, he attends and reflects, it is named "abiding in the body-contemplation upon the inner body"; if, upon the in-breath and out-breath's flowing-on being cut off in the livid state and the rest among another's dead corpse, he attends and reflects, it is named "abiding in the body-contemplation upon the outer body"; if he gives rise to resolute conviction upon the time of his own approaching death, or gives rise to resolute conviction upon the non-flowing of the in-breath and out-breath in one already dead, or gives rise to resolute conviction upon the non-flowing of the in-breath and out-breath in one not yet dead (because it is so by the nature of things), it is named "abiding in the body-contemplation upon the inner-and-outer body."

Pervading all right preparatory efforts, you should cultivate this kind of "aid-companion of the tranquillity-side, subsumed under the tranquillity-side" non-erroneous preparatory effort; all the rest is to be known as before.

Ardor · Right Knowing with Mindfulness · Subduing Worldly Greed and Grief

Thus, all beginners in practice, when they receive right instruction and cultivate right practice, abide in "ardor, right knowing with mindfulness, and subduing all worldly greed and grief." If, within the right preparatory effort, one constantly practices, finally practices, and attends non-erroneously, and cannot be moved and disturbed by uproar and the rest, this is named "ardor"; if, within the right preparatory effort, one cultivates tranquillity and insight and thoroughly knows the signs of disturbance and non-disturbance, this is named "right knowing with mindfulness"; if one can well take up the signs of world-weariness and the signs of gladness, this is named "subduing all worldly greed and grief." For these causes, it is declared that he can abide in ardor, down to subduing worldly greed and grief.

The Accomplishment of Attention: Bodily and Mental Pliancy Arises · Named "One Who Possesses Attention"

When he first gives rise to this right preparatory effort, the one-pointedness of mind and the bodily and mental pliancy still turn faint and feeble, hard to notice; afterward, by cultivating superior tranquillity and superior insight, body and mind become clear, supple, and pliant, and that formerly faint and feeble one-pointedness of mind and bodily-and-mental pliancy gradually grows further and can draw on a strong, vigorous, and easily noticed one-pointedness of mind and bodily-and-mental pliancy — by the skillful-means principle whereby causal force successively draws it forth, at that time it will not be long before he raises the strong, vigorous, easily noticed bodily-and-mental pliancy and one-pointedness of mind.

Thus even a "forerunning sign" arises: upon the crown of his head something like a heavy weight arises, yet it is not a sign of harm or torment. By this very sign arising within, the "coarse-heaviness of mind" that obstructs the joyous severing of the categories of affliction is all removed and extinguished, and the "suppleness of mind and pliancy of mind" that can counteract it are all made to arise; and because of this arising, there come into the body many great elements with a "predominant increase of the wind-element" that conform to and produce bodily pliancy, and because these great elements enter the body, the "coarse-heaviness of body" that obstructs the joyous severing of the categories of affliction is all dispelled, and the "suppleness of body and pliancy of body" that can counteract it pervade the whole body, in a state as of overflowing fullness. When it first arises, it makes the mind leap up, glad and delighted, accompanied by rejoicing, and makes the object-domain that gives the mind joy appear within the mind; from this point onward, the force of that first-arisen pliancy gradually slackens, and a subtle and marvelous pliancy travels along with the body and turns within the body — whereby the mind's leaping-up gradually recedes, and, held together by tranquillity, the mind turns quiet upon its object.

From this point onward, this beginner in practice is named "one who possesses attention," and first comes to fall within the number of those who "possess attention." Why? Because he has for the first time obtained the slight, subtle, and marvelous right attention subsumed under the meditative ground of the form realm, and by this cause he is named "one who possesses attention."

The beginner in practice who obtains this attention has these signs: he has obtained a slight portion of the concentrated mind subsumed under the form realm, a slight portion of bodily-and-mental pliancy and one-pointedness of mind; he has the strength and capacity to well cultivate the preparatory effort of the "object that purifies the afflictions," making the mind's continuities turn moistened, held and protected by tranquillity, able to purify the formations; though he moves amid all manner of lovable object-domains, the fierce entanglement of greed does not arise, and even if it arises slightly, relying on a slight, faint counteragent, a single moment of attention can dispel it (as with lovable object-domains, so too with the hateful, the deluding, the pride-provoking, and the discursive-thought-provoking object-domains); sitting quietly in a still room, briefly holding his mind, bodily-and-mental pliancy arises swiftly, he is not much oppressed by the coarse-heaviness of body, does not too frequently give rise to the active operation of the hindrances, and does not too frequently give rise to the notion-attentions accompanied by yearning, joylessness, and anxious grief; and though he rises from concentration and walks about outside, there is still a slight residual force of pliancy that travels along with body and mind — these and their kind should be known as the pure signs of "one who possesses attention."

聲聞地 · 第四瑜伽處 · 世間道 · 七種作意離欲The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · Fourth Yoga-Station · The Worldly Path: Freedom from Desire through the Seven Attentions

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

第四瑜伽處的開端。先標全處的「此嗢拕南」十科,再分判:修者已得作意之後,唯有「世間、出世間」二趣可行。本葉說「世間道」的離欲法——須由七種作意(了相·勝解·遠離·攝樂·觀察·加行究竟·加行究竟果)方能離欲界欲;其中了相作意以六事(義·事·相·品·時·理)覺知欲界的麁相、初靜慮的靜相。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

開卷·此嗢拕南(全處十科)

復次,這「此嗢拕南」(攝頌)說:   七作意離欲、及諸定、廣辯、
  二定、五神通、生差別、諸相。
  觀察於諸諦,如實而通達,
  廣分別於修,究竟為其後。
〔此十科即第四瑜伽處的全綱;下文先就「世間、出世間」二趣分判,本葉屬世間道。〕

一、二趣分判——世間道與出世間道

已得作意的諸瑜伽師,已證入這樣的少分樂斷〔即前所成作意之分斷〕。從此以後,唯有二條路,更無其餘。哪二條?一是「世間〔道〕」,二是「出世間〔道〕」。那初修業的諸瑜伽師,依這作意,或念「我當往世間趣」,或念「我當往出世趣」,並反覆多修習這作意。隨著在此極多修習,所有的輕安、心一境性,經歷一日一夜等種種階位,便轉轉增廣。若這作意堅固、相續、強盛地運轉,發起對清淨所緣的勝解,於奢摩他(止)品及毘鉢舍那(觀)品都能善取其相;他這時,或樂往世間道而發起加行,或樂往出世道而發起加行。

二、哪些人樂往世間道

問:這裡有幾種補特伽羅(眾生),是在現法(這一生)就樂往世間道發起加行、而不走出世道的? 答:略有四種:一、一切外道;二、於正法中根性羸劣、先修「止」行的人;三、根性雖利、但善根未成熟的人;四、一切菩薩——樂於當來世證大菩提,不在現法(求證)。這四種人,於現法中樂往世間道發起加行。  樂往世間道發起加行的人,又分二種:一、「具縛」者,即諸異生(凡夫);二、「不具縛」者,即諸有學(仍在學地、未證無學的聖者)。這怎麼說?就是先把欲界看作麁性,把初靜慮(無論是修得的「定」、還是受生的「生」)看作靜性,發起加行,離欲界的欲;如此展轉,乃至發起加行、離無所有處的欲,當知也都這樣。  又依靜慮等,能引發無想定等,及能發起五神通等;又即依此「生」與「相」,後文都當廣說〔見次葉「諸定廣辯」〕。  為了離欲界的欲,勤修觀行的諸瑜伽師,要由「七種作意」才能獲得離欲界欲。

三、七種作意

哪七種作意?就是:了相作意、勝解作意、遠離作意、攝樂作意、觀察作意、加行究竟作意、加行究竟果作意。

(一)了相作意——以六事覺欲界麁相、初靜慮靜相

什麼是了相作意?就是這樣一種作意,能正覺了「欲界的麁相」與「初靜慮的靜相」。怎麼覺了欲界的麁相?就是正尋思「欲界六事」。哪六事?一、義,二、事,三、相,四、品,五、時,六、理。

一、尋思諸欲的麁「義」:正尋思——這些欲有許多過患、許多損惱、許多疫癘(如病疫)、許多災害。於諸欲中「多過患」之義乃至「多災害」之義,名為麁義。 二、尋思諸欲的麁「事」:正尋思——於諸欲中有「內貪欲」,於諸欲中有「外貪欲」。 三、尋思諸欲的「自相」(與共相):正尋思——此是「煩惱欲」(貪欲煩惱本身),此是「事欲」(所貪求的境事)。這又有三種:順樂受處、順苦受處、順不苦不樂受處。順樂受處是貪欲的依處,是「想倒、心倒」的依處;順苦受處是瞋恚的依處,是忿、恨的依處;順不苦不樂受處是愚癡的依處,是覆、惱、誑、諂、無慚、無愧的依處,是「見倒」的依處。便正尋思:這些欲,是被極惡的諸受所隨逐、被極惡的煩惱所隨逐。這名為尋思諸欲的自相。 尋思諸欲的「共相」:正尋思——這一切欲,都被生苦、老苦,乃至求不得苦等所隨逐、所隨縛。受欲的人,被「圓滿欲」驅迫而轉,也還沒解脫生等法;那些欲縱然勝妙圓滿,也只是暫時而有。這名為尋思諸欲的共相。〔「相」一事開為自相、共相二門。〕 四、尋思諸欲的麁「品」:正尋思——這些欲都墮於黑品(染惡一類),猶如骨鎖、如凝血肉、如草炬火、如一分炭火、如大毒蛇、如夢所見、如假借得來的莊嚴具、如樹端的果。追求諸欲的有情,於諸欲中要受六種苦:追求所作苦、防護所作苦、親愛失壞所作苦、無厭足所作苦、不自在所作苦、惡行所作苦(一切如前應知)。如世尊所說:習近諸欲有五種過患——一者,這些欲極少滋味,多諸苦惱、多諸過患;二者,於習近時,能令人無厭、無足、無滿;三者,常被諸佛及佛弟子、賢善正行、正至善士以無量門呵責毀呰;四者,於習近時,能令諸結(煩惱)積集增長;五者,於習近時,我說「沒有惡不善業是不去造的」。這些欲令人無厭足、為多人所共有,是非法行、惡行之因,增長欲愛,為智者所遠離,速趣消滅,依託眾緣,是諸放逸危亡之地;是無常、虛偽、妄失之法,猶如幻化,誑惑愚夫。無論現法欲、後法欲、天上欲、人中欲,一切都是魔之所行、魔之所住,在這些處所能生無量「依意所起」的惡不善法——所謂貪、瞋及憤、諍等,於聖弟子正修學時能作障礙。由這些差別因緣,這些欲多分墮在黑品所攝。這名為尋思諸欲的麁品。 五、尋思諸欲的麁「時」:正尋思——這些欲,於過去、未來、現在世,於常常時、於恒恒時(一向地、長久地),多諸過患、多諸損惱、多諸疫癘、多諸災害。這名為尋思諸欲的麁時。 六、尋思諸欲的麁「理」:正尋思——這些欲,要由大資糧、由大追求、由大劬勞,及由種種無量差別的工巧業處,才能招集、生起、增長。又這些欲,雖善生起、雖善增長,大多是為了「外攝受事」——即父母、妻子、奴婢、作使、親友、眷屬;或是為了對治自身內部有色的麁重四大(地水火風),以糜飯(飲食)長養,還常須覆蔽、沐浴、按摩;而這身正是會壞、會斷、會離散、會消滅之法身,隨之生起種種苦惱。 食能對治飢渴苦;衣能對治寒熱苦,又能覆蔽可慚羞處;臥具能治勞睡苦,又能對治經行、住立的苦;病緣醫藥能治病苦。所以這些欲(資具)只能對治隨時生起的種種苦惱,不應染著而受用,唯應以正念受用——譬如被重病逼切的人,為除病故才服雜穢的藥。 又這些欲,有「至教量」(聖教的證量)證明它有麁相;又這些欲如此這般的所有麁相,我也於內心以「現智見」(自內現見)證知;又這些欲,有「比度量」(比量推度)可知它有麁相。 又這些欲,從無始以來本性麁穢,這是「成就法性、難思法性」的(本來如此、不可思議),不應思議、不應分別。這名為尋思諸欲的麁理。 如此,就是由六種事覺了欲界諸欲的麁相。又能覺了初靜慮中所有的靜相:就是欲界中一切的麁性,在初靜慮中都沒有了;由於離了欲界的諸麁性,所以說初靜慮中有靜性。這名為覺了初靜慮中所有的靜相。即由這樣的「定地作意」,於欲界了知為麁相、於初靜慮了知為靜相,所以名為「了相作意」。這了相作意,當說它還是「聞、思」間雜的(尚未純是修)。

(二)勝解作意

他既如此如理尋思,了知諸欲是麁相、初靜慮是靜相;從此以後,超過聞、思,唯用「修」行,於所緣相發起勝解,修奢摩他、毘鉢舍那。既修習了,就如先前所尋思的麁相、靜相,數數生起勝解。這名為勝解作意。

(三)遠離作意

即由這勝解善修、善習、善多修習為因緣,最初生起「斷煩惱道」;即與這所生起的斷煩惱道俱行的作意,這裡名為遠離作意。

(四)攝樂作意

由於能最初斷除欲界先前所應斷的諸煩惱,及能除遣那煩惱品的麁重性;從此以後,愛樂於「斷」、愛樂「遠離」,於諸斷中見到殊勝功德,觸證少分的遠離喜樂。於時時之間,作「欣樂作意」而深深慶悅;於時時之間,作「厭離作意」而深深厭患——為的是除遣惛沈睡眠、掉舉等。這名為攝樂作意。

(五)觀察作意

他由這樣樂斷、樂修,正修加行,以善品任持,欲界所繫的諸煩惱纏,無論行時、住時都不再現行。他便作念:「我如今對諸欲中的貪欲煩惱,是還有而不覺知呢?還是沒有了呢?」為審察這事,便隨取一種可愛的淨相作意思惟。因為還沒永斷諸隨眠,所以思惟這淨妙相時,便又發起「隨習近心、趣習近心、臨習近心」(趨近貪境之心),不能安住於捨,不能厭毀、制伏、違逆〔那貪〕。他便作念:「我對諸欲還沒解脫,我心還沒正得解脫,我心仍被諸行制伏——如水被〔器所〕持〔而不自在〕——還沒被法性所制伏。我今應當為永斷其餘的隨眠,正勤安住於樂斷、樂修。」這名為觀察作意。

(六)加行究竟作意

從此倍加樂斷、樂修,修奢摩他、毘鉢舍那,鄭重觀察,修習對治,時時觀察先前所已斷的。由這因緣,從欲界所繫的一切煩惱,心得離繫。這是由「暫時伏斷」的方便〔達成〕,並非畢竟永害煩惱的種子。當這時,初靜慮地的「前加行道」已得究竟,一切煩惱的對治作意都已生起。這名為加行究竟作意。

(七)加行究竟果作意

從此無間(緊接著),由這因緣,證入根本初靜慮定;即與這根本初靜慮定俱行的作意,名為加行究竟果作意。

四、證入初靜慮——圓滿五支、離欲界欲

又於「遠離作意、攝樂作意」現在運轉時,能適悅身的「離生喜樂」於時時間微薄現前;「加行究竟作意」運轉時,那喜樂轉復增廣,於時時間深重現前;「加行究竟果作意」運轉時,離生喜樂遍滿諸身分,無不充滿、無有間隙。他這時,遠離諸欲、遠離一切惡不善法,「有尋有伺,離生喜樂」,於初靜慮圓滿五支〔尋·伺·喜·樂·心一境性〕具足安住,名為「住欲界對治的修果」,名為「隨證得離欲界欲」。

五、七作意各斷何惑

又:了相作意,於所應斷的能正了知,於所應得的能正了知,為斷應斷、為得應得而心生希願;勝解作意,為斷、為得而正發加行;遠離作意,能捨所有「上品」煩惱;攝樂作意,能捨所有「中品」煩惱;觀察作意,能於所得離增上慢、安住其心;加行究竟作意,能捨所有「下品」煩惱;加行究竟果作意,能正領受那諸作意善修習的果。

六、七作意攝入四作意

又:若了相作意、若勝解作意,總名「隨順作意」——與「厭壞對治」俱行; 若遠離作意、若加行究竟作意,總名「對治作意」——與「斷對治」俱行;若攝樂作意,名「對治作意」兼「順清淨作意」; 若觀察作意,名「順觀察作意」。如此,其餘的四種作意,當知都攝入六作意中——即隨順作意、對治作意、順清淨作意、順觀察作意。

七、此七作意通於上地

如初靜慮定有七種作意,第二、第三、第四靜慮定,及空無邊處、識無邊處、無所有處、非想非非想處定,當知也各有七種作意。  〔了相舉第二靜慮為例〕若於「有尋有伺」的初靜慮地覺了麁相、於「無尋無伺」的第二靜慮地覺了靜相,為欲證入第二靜慮——應知這名為〔第二靜慮的〕了相作意。就是已證入初靜慮定、已得初靜慮的人,於諸「尋、伺」觀為麁性,能正了知:若在定地,於所緣最初率爾而起、匆遽而行的境,那「麁的意言性」就是「尋」;即於那所緣隨之而起、隨之而行、徐緩經歷的境,那「細的意言性」就是「伺」。又正了知:這尋、伺是「心法性」(心所之法),心生時生、共有、相應、同緣一境而轉。又正了知:這尋、伺依內而生,屬「外處」所攝。又正了知:這一切尋伺,是過去、未來、現在所攝,從因而生、從緣而生,或增或減、不久安住、暫時而有、率爾現前,令心躁擾、令心散動,不寂靜地運轉;求上地時,「苦住」隨逐——所以都是黑品所攝。〔尋伺〕隨逐諸欲,對「離生喜樂」只有少分的勝利;隨所在的地,自性能令〔心〕有這樣的相;於常常時、恒恒時,有尋有伺的心行所緣躁擾而轉,不得寂靜。以這樣種種行相,於諸尋伺覺了麁相。又正了知:第二靜慮無尋無伺,這一切所說的麁相都沒有了,所以說第二靜慮有它的靜相——因為那些麁相都遠離了。為欲證入第二靜慮,隨其所應,其餘的〔六〕作意如前應知。如此乃至為欲證入非想非非想處定,於地地中隨其所應,當知都有七種作意。  又那麁相,遍在一切下地都有:下從欲界,展轉上至無所有處。當知麁相略有二種:一是「諸下地苦住增上」(下地的苦住偏重)——因為望上地所住是不寂靜的;二是「諸壽量時分短促」——因為望上地的壽量是轉減少的。這二種麁相,由前面的六事,隨其所應,當正尋思。隨在那一地樂於離欲時,便隨其所應,於上一地尋思靜相,漸次乃至證得〔那地的〕加行究竟果作意。

The opening of the Fourth Yoga-Station. First the "uddāna here" that sets out the ten sub-topics of the whole station is stated; then the division is drawn: after a practitioner has attained attention, only two courses — the worldly and the world-transcending — remain to be walked. This leaf expounds the method of freedom from desire on the "worldly path": one can become free from the desires of the desire realm only through the seven attentions (apprehending-the-aspect · resolute-conviction · seclusion · joy-gathering · investigation · culmination-of-effort · fruit-of-culmination-of-effort); and among them, the attention that apprehends the aspect knows, through six matters (meaning · thing · characteristic · class · time · principle), the coarse aspect of the desire realm and the calm aspect of the first meditative absorption. The technical terms are kept as of old, rendered clause by clause into today's language; no doctrinal exposition is added, no treatise is cited, no Sanskrit is annotated; where the treatise's wording is compressed, it is restored within 〔 〕.

Opening · The Uddāna Here (the Ten Sub-topics of the Whole Station)

Further, this "uddāna here" (summary verse) says:   Freedom from desire through the seven attentions, and the several concentrations, extensively expounded;
  the two concentrations, the five supernormal powers, the differences of birth, the several characteristics.
  Investigating all the truths, penetrating them as they really are,
  extensively distinguishing cultivation, with culmination as their last.
〔These ten sub-topics are the whole outline of the Fourth Yoga-Station; below, the division is first drawn between the two courses — the worldly and the world-transcending — and this leaf belongs to the worldly path.〕

One · The Division of the Two Courses — the Worldly Path and the World-Transcending Path

The yoga practitioners who have attained attention have already entered upon such a partial delighting-in-severance 〔that is, the partial severance accomplished by the attention formed before〕. From this point on, there are only two paths, and no other. Which two? One is the "worldly 〔path〕," the other is the "world-transcending 〔path〕." Those yoga practitioners in the first stages of the undertaking, relying on this attention, either think "I shall proceed to the worldly course" or think "I shall proceed to the world-transcending course," and repeatedly cultivate this attention again and again. As they cultivate it exceedingly much herein, all the pliancy and one-pointedness of mind, passing through the various stations of a day and a night and the like, grow more and more expansive. If this attention operates firmly, continuously, and vigorously, it gives rise to a resolute conviction toward a pure object, and it can rightly grasp the characteristics of both the tranquillity (śamatha) class and the insight (vipaśyanā) class; at this time he either delights in proceeding on the worldly path and sets his intensified effort in motion, or delights in proceeding on the world-transcending path and sets his intensified effort in motion.

Two · Which Persons Delight in Proceeding on the Worldly Path

Question: How many kinds of person (pudgala, sentient being) are there here who, in the present life (this very life), delight in proceeding on the worldly path and set their intensified effort in motion, and do not proceed on the world-transcending path? Answer: In brief there are four kinds. First, all non-Buddhists; second, those in the true Dharma whose faculties are weak and inferior, who have first cultivated the practice of "tranquillity"; third, those whose faculties are indeed sharp but whose roots of goodness are not yet matured; fourth, all bodhisattvas — who delight in realizing great awakening in a future life, and not in the present life (as a matter of seeking realization now). These four kinds of person, in the present life, delight in proceeding on the worldly path and set their intensified effort in motion.  Those who delight in proceeding on the worldly path and set their intensified effort in motion are further of two kinds: first, those "with the full bond," namely the ordinary beings (worldlings); second, those "not with the full bond," namely those still in training (the noble ones still on the ground of training, who have not yet realized the state beyond training). How is this? It is that one first regards the desire realm as of coarse nature, and regards the first meditative absorption (whether the "concentration" that is cultivated and attained, or the "birth" that is taken through rebirth) as of calm nature; and, setting intensified effort in motion, becomes free from the desires of the desire realm; and thus, by successive stages — down to setting intensified effort in motion so as to become free from the desire of the sphere of nothing-whatever — it should be understood, in all cases, to be like this.  Further, relying on the meditative absorptions and the like, one can draw forth the attainment of no-perception and the like, and can set in motion the five supernormal powers and the like; and further, taking just this "birth" and this "characteristic," all of it is to be expounded extensively below 〔see the next leaf, "the several concentrations, extensively expounded"〕.  In order to become free from the desires of the desire realm, the yoga practitioners who diligently cultivate the practice of contemplation can obtain freedom from the desires of the desire realm only through the "seven attentions."

Three · The Seven Attentions

Which seven attentions? They are: the attention that apprehends the aspect, the attention of resolute conviction, the attention of seclusion, the attention that gathers joy, the attention of investigation, the attention of the culmination of effort, and the attention that is the fruit of the culmination of effort.

(i) The Attention that Apprehends the Aspect — Knowing, through Six Matters, the Coarse Aspect of the Desire Realm and the Calm Aspect of the First Absorption

What is the attention that apprehends the aspect? It is just such an attention as can rightly know and apprehend "the coarse aspect of the desire realm" and "the calm aspect of the first meditative absorption." How does one know the coarse aspect of the desire realm? It is by rightly investigating the "six matters of the desire realm." Which six matters? First, meaning; second, thing; third, characteristic; fourth, class; fifth, time; sixth, principle.

First, investigating the coarse "meaning" of the desires: one rightly investigates — these desires have many faults, many injuries and afflictions, many plagues (as of a pestilence), many calamities. In the desires, the meaning of "many faults," down to the meaning of "many calamities," is called the coarse meaning. Second, investigating the coarse "thing" of the desires: one rightly investigates — within the desires there is "inner covetous desire," within the desires there is "outer covetous desire." Third, investigating the "own-characteristic" (and the common-characteristic) of the desires: one rightly investigates — this is "affliction-desire" (the covetous-desire affliction itself), this is "thing-desire" (the object-thing coveted). This latter is again of three kinds: that which conduces to the site of pleasant feeling, that which conduces to the site of painful feeling, that which conduces to the site of neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling. That which conduces to the site of pleasant feeling is the basis of covetous desire, is the basis of the "distortion of perception and the distortion of mind"; that which conduces to the site of painful feeling is the basis of ill-will, is the basis of anger and enmity; that which conduces to the site of neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling is the basis of delusion, is the basis of concealment, vexation, deceit, dissimulation, non-conscience, and non-shame, and is the basis of the "distortion of view." Thus one rightly investigates: these desires are pursued by the most evil feelings, are pursued by the most evil afflictions. This is called investigating the own-characteristic of the desires. Investigating the "common-characteristic" of the desires: one rightly investigates — all these desires are pursued and bound by the suffering of birth, the suffering of aging, down to the suffering of not obtaining what one seeks, and so on. A person who partakes of desires is driven onward by "the desire for fullness," and still has not been liberated from the phenomena of birth and the rest; and those desires, though supreme, marvelous, and complete, exist only for a while. This is called investigating the common-characteristic of the desires. 〔The one matter "characteristic" is opened into the two gates of own-characteristic and common-characteristic.〕 Fourth, investigating the coarse "class" of the desires: one rightly investigates — these desires all fall within the black class (the tainted-and-evil kind), like a chain of bones, like a lump of congealed blood-and-flesh, like a torch of straw, like a portion of glowing coals, like a great venomous snake, like what is seen in a dream, like ornaments obtained on loan, like fruit at a tree's tip. The sentient beings who pursue the desires must, within the desires, undergo six kinds of suffering: the suffering that comes of pursuit, the suffering that comes of safeguarding, the suffering that comes of the loss and ruin of loved ones, the suffering that comes of insatiability, the suffering that comes of unfreedom, and the suffering that comes of evil conduct (all as should be understood before). As the World-Honored One has said: to become intimate with the desires has five kinds of fault — first, these desires have exceedingly little relish and much distress and affliction, many faults; second, in becoming intimate with them, they make a person without weariness, without sufficiency, without satiety; third, they are ever reproached and reviled through countless approaches by the buddhas and the disciples of the buddhas, by the wise and good who conduct themselves rightly and reach rightly; fourth, in becoming intimate with them, they cause the fetters (afflictions) to accumulate and grow; fifth, in becoming intimate with them, I say "there is no evil, unwholesome deed that is not committed." These desires make a person insatiable, are held in common by many people, are the cause of unlawful conduct and evil conduct, increase the craving for desire, are shunned by the wise, hasten toward extinction, rely on a host of conditions, and are a ground of the peril and ruin of all heedlessness; they are phenomena that are impermanent, false, and deceptive, like a magical conjuration deluding the foolish. Whether the desires of the present life, the desires of a later life, the desires of the heavens, or the desires among humans, all are the domain of Māra, the abode of Māra; in these sites can arise countless evil, unwholesome phenomena "that arise dependent on the mind" — namely covetousness, ill-will, and rancor, contention, and the rest, which can make obstruction when the noble disciple is rightly cultivating and training. By these differentiating causes and conditions, these desires for the most part fall within what is subsumed under the black class. This is called investigating the coarse class of the desires. Fifth, investigating the coarse "time" of the desires: one rightly investigates — these desires, in the past, future, and present periods, at all constant times and at all perpetual times (ever and enduringly), have many faults, many injuries and afflictions, many plagues, many calamities. This is called investigating the coarse time of the desires. Sixth, investigating the coarse "principle" of the desires: one rightly investigates — these desires must, by great provisions, by great pursuit, by great toil, and by all manner of countless differing sites of craft and occupation, be gathered together, arise, and grow. Again, these desires, though well arisen, though well grown, are for the most part for the sake of "the outer things one takes hold of" — that is, father and mother, wife and children, servants and bond-maids, hirelings and hands, friends and kin, and one's retinue; or else for the sake of countering the coarse-and-heavy four great elements (earth, water, fire, wind) that are the inner form of one's own body, nourished by gruel and rice (food and drink), and requiring, moreover, constant covering, bathing, and massage; and this very body is a body-of-phenomena that will decay, will break off, will disperse, will be extinguished, and, along with it, various sufferings and afflictions arise. Food can counter the suffering of hunger and thirst; clothing can counter the suffering of cold and heat, and can cover the places of shame; bedding can counter the suffering of fatigue and drowsiness, and can further counter the suffering of walking meditation and of standing; medicine on the occasion of illness can counter the suffering of illness. Therefore these desires (the necessaries) can only counter the various sufferings and afflictions that arise from time to time, and are not to be received with defiled attachment, but are to be received only with right mindfulness — just as a person hard-pressed by a grave illness, for the sake of ridding himself of the illness, takes a foul and impure medicine. Again, these desires have the "authoritative measure" (the attested measure of the noble teaching) to prove that they have a coarse aspect; and these desires, in all their being-thus-and-so coarse aspects, I also, within my own mind, by "the seeing of manifest knowledge" (direct inner seeing), know and attest; and these desires have the "comparative measure" (inferential reckoning) by which one may know that they have a coarse aspect. Again, these desires, from beginningless time, are by nature coarse and foul; this is a matter of "accomplished dharma-nature, hard-to-conceive dharma-nature" (thus of themselves, inconceivable), and are not to be pondered, not to be discriminated. This is called investigating the coarse principle of the desires. Thus it is that, by the six matters, one knows and apprehends the coarse aspect of the desires of the desire realm. And one can further know and apprehend the calm aspect present in the first meditative absorption: that is, all that is of coarse nature in the desire realm is absent in the first meditative absorption; because it is apart from the various coarse natures of the desire realm, it is said that there is calm nature in the first meditative absorption. This is called knowing and apprehending the calm aspect present in the first meditative absorption. Precisely by such a "concentration-ground attention," one knows the desire realm as the coarse aspect and knows the first meditative absorption as the calm aspect, and therefore it is named the "attention that apprehends the aspect." This attention that apprehends the aspect, it should be said, is still one mingled with "hearing and reflection" (not yet purely cultivation).

(ii) The Attention of Resolute Conviction

He, having thus investigated in accord with principle, knows that the desires are the coarse aspect and the first meditative absorption is the calm aspect; from this point on, he passes beyond hearing and reflection and uses "cultivation" alone, gives rise to resolute conviction toward the characteristics of the object, and cultivates tranquillity and insight. Having cultivated them, then, just as the coarse aspect and the calm aspect investigated before, he gives rise, again and again, to resolute conviction. This is called the attention of resolute conviction.

(iii) The Attention of Seclusion

Precisely by this resolute conviction well cultivated, well practiced, and well cultivated much, as its cause and condition, the "path that severs the afflictions" first arises; and precisely the attention that operates together with this arisen path that severs the afflictions is here named the attention of seclusion.

(iv) The Attention that Gathers Joy

Because one can first sever those afflictions of the desire realm that were formerly to be severed, and can dispel the coarse-and-heavy nature of that class of afflictions; from this point on, one takes delight in "severance," takes delight in "seclusion," sees supreme merit within the severances, and touches-and-attests a partial joy-and-bliss of seclusion. From time to time, one makes a "gladdening attention" and deeply rejoices; from time to time, one makes a "wearied-detachment attention" and deeply wearies-and-recoils — for the sake of dispelling dullness-and-drowsiness, agitation, and the like. This is called the attention that gathers joy.

(v) The Attention of Investigation

He, thus delighting in severance and delighting in cultivation, rightly cultivating the intensified effort, upheld by the wholesome class, so that the fetters of afflictions bound to the desire realm no longer become active whether while moving or while abiding. He then makes the thought: "As for the covetous-desire affliction within the desires, do I still have it, unawares? Or is it gone?" To examine this matter, he then takes up some one lovable, pure characteristic and attends to it in thought. Because he has not yet permanently severed the latent proclivities, when he ponders this pure-and-marvelous characteristic, there again arises "a mind that draws near to intimacy, a mind that proceeds toward intimacy, a mind that borders on intimacy" (a mind approaching the object of desire), so that he cannot abide in equanimity, cannot weary-of, subdue, or go against 〔that desire〕. He then makes the thought: "As for the desires, I am not yet liberated; my mind is not yet rightly attained to liberation; my mind is still subdued by the formations — like water held 〔by a vessel, and not free〕 — and is not yet subdued by the dharma-nature. I should now, in order permanently to sever the remaining latent proclivities, rightly and diligently abide in delighting-in-severance and delighting-in-cultivation." This is called the attention of investigation.

(vi) The Attention of the Culmination of Effort

From this he redoubles his delight in severance and delight in cultivation, cultivates tranquillity and insight, gravely investigates, cultivates the counteragents, and from time to time investigates what was formerly already severed. By this cause and condition, his mind attains release-from-bond from all the afflictions bound to the desire realm. This is 〔accomplished〕 by the expedient of "provisional suppression-and-severance," and is not the ultimate permanent harming of the seeds of the afflictions. At this time, the "path of preliminary effort" of the ground of the first meditative absorption has reached its culmination, and the counteragent-attention against all afflictions has arisen. This is called the attention of the culmination of effort.

(vii) The Attention that Is the Fruit of the Culmination of Effort

From this, without interval (immediately following), by this cause and condition, one enters upon the root first meditative absorption concentration; and precisely the attention that operates together with this root first meditative absorption concentration is named the attention that is the fruit of the culmination of effort.

Four · Entering the First Absorption — Perfecting the Five Factors, Free from the Desire of the Desire Realm

Further, while "the attention of seclusion and the attention that gathers joy" are presently operating, the "joy-and-bliss born of seclusion" that gladdens the body appears from time to time, thin and slight; while "the attention of the culmination of effort" operates, that joy-and-bliss grows more and more expansive and appears, from time to time, deep and weighty; while "the attention that is the fruit of the culmination of effort" operates, the joy-and-bliss born of seclusion pervades all the parts of the body, filling every one, without a gap. He, at this time, secluded from the desires, secluded from all evil and unwholesome phenomena, "with applied and sustained thought, joy-and-bliss born of seclusion," in the first meditative absorption abides fully endowed with the perfected five factors 〔applied thought · sustained thought · joy · bliss · one-pointedness of mind〕, and this is named "abiding in the fruit of cultivation that counters the desire realm," and is named "the successive realizing of freedom from the desire of the desire realm."

Five · What Affliction Each of the Seven Attentions Severs

Further: the attention that apprehends the aspect can rightly know what is to be severed, and can rightly know what is to be attained, and gives rise to aspiration in the mind for the severing of what is to be severed and the attaining of what is to be attained; the attention of resolute conviction rightly sets intensified effort in motion for the sake of severing and for the sake of attaining; the attention of seclusion can cast off all the "superior-class" afflictions; the attention that gathers joy can cast off all the "middle-class" afflictions; the attention of investigation can, with regard to what is attained, become free from overweening pride and settle its mind; the attention of the culmination of effort can cast off all the "inferior-class" afflictions; the attention that is the fruit of the culmination of effort can rightly receive the fruit of all those attentions well cultivated.

Six · The Seven Attentions Subsumed under Four Attentions

Further: if it is the attention that apprehends the aspect, or the attention of resolute conviction, both together are named "conforming attention" — operating together with "the counteragent of wearied-destruction"; if it is the attention of seclusion, or the attention of the culmination of effort, both together are named "counteragent attention" — operating together with "the counteragent that severs"; if it is the attention that gathers joy, it is named "counteragent attention," and also "attention conducive to purity"; if it is the attention of investigation, it is named "attention conducive to investigation." Thus, the remaining four kinds of attention should be understood to be subsumed, in all cases, within six attentions — namely conforming attention, counteragent attention, attention conducive to purity, and attention conducive to investigation.

Seven · These Seven Attentions Pertain to the Higher Grounds as Well

Just as the first meditative absorption concentration has seven kinds of attention, so the second, third, and fourth meditative absorption concentrations, and the concentrations of the sphere of infinite space, the sphere of infinite consciousness, the sphere of nothing-whatever, and the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, should be understood each to have seven kinds of attention as well.  〔Apprehending-the-aspect is illustrated by the second meditative absorption〕 If, at the first-absorption ground which "has applied and sustained thought," one knows the coarse aspect, and, at the second-absorption ground which "has neither applied nor sustained thought," one knows the calm aspect, in order to enter the second meditative absorption — this, it should be understood, is named the 〔second absorption's〕 attention that apprehends the aspect. That is, one who has already entered the first meditative absorption concentration, and has attained the first meditative absorption, regards the several "applied and sustained thoughts" as of coarse nature, and can rightly know: if, on the concentration-ground, with respect to an object that first arises spontaneously and courses hurriedly, that "coarse mind-speech nature" is "applied thought"; and, with respect to that object that arises along with it, courses along with it, and passes slowly and gradually, that "fine mind-speech nature" is "sustained thought." He further rightly knows: this applied thought and sustained thought are "of the nature of mental phenomena" (dharmas of the mental factors), arising when the mind arises, coexistent, associated, and operating with the same single object. He further rightly knows: this applied thought and sustained thought arise inwardly and are subsumed under the "outer sense-fields." He further rightly knows: all this applied and sustained thought is subsumed under past, future, and present, arises from causes, arises from conditions, now increasing and now decreasing, not abiding long, existing only for a while, appearing spontaneously, making the mind restless, making the mind scattered, operating without calm; and when one seeks the higher ground, the "abiding-in-suffering" pursues it — therefore all of it is subsumed under the black class. 〔Applied and sustained thought〕 pursue the several desires, and afford only a partial excellence toward the "joy-and-bliss born of seclusion"; according to whatever ground they are in, their intrinsic nature can make 〔the mind〕 have such an aspect; at all constant times and all perpetual times, the mental activity with applied and sustained thought, with its object, operates restlessly and does not attain calm. By such various aspects, he knows and apprehends the coarse aspect within the several instances of applied and sustained thought. He further rightly knows: the second meditative absorption has neither applied nor sustained thought, and all these coarse aspects spoken of are absent; therefore it is said that the second meditative absorption has its calm aspect — because those coarse aspects are all secluded-from. In order to enter the second meditative absorption, the remaining 〔six〕 attentions, according to what is fitting, are as should be understood before. And thus, down to the wish to enter the concentration of the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, in ground after ground, according to what is fitting, it should be understood that there are, in all cases, seven kinds of attention.  Further, that coarse aspect is present pervasively in all the lower grounds: from the desire realm below, successively up to the sphere of nothing-whatever. It should be understood that the coarse aspect is, in brief, of two kinds: first, "the predominance of the abiding-in-suffering of the lower grounds" (the abiding-in-suffering of the lower grounds being weighty) — because, as against the higher ground, what is abided-in is not calm; second, "the shortness of the measure of life-span and its time-portion" — because, as against the higher ground, the measure of life-span grows successively less. These two coarse aspects, by the aforesaid six matters, according to what is fitting, one should rightly investigate. In whatever ground one delights in freedom from desire, one accordingly investigates the calm aspect in the higher ground, and by successive stages, down to the attaining of 〔that ground's〕 attention that is the fruit of the culmination of effort.

聲聞地 · 第四瑜伽處 · 世間道 · 諸定廣辯The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · The Fourth Yoga-Station · The Mundane Path · The Concentrations, Extensively Analyzed

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

承前葉「七作意離欲」,本葉廣辯所證得的諸定:先逐句解四靜慮的定型句(離生喜樂…捨念清淨),次說四無色(空無邊處乃至非想非非想處)、二無心定(無想定·滅盡定)、依靜慮所發的五神通(修十二想)、修諸定當生的諸天(生差別),末說離欲者的相。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

一、離欲二種、離二種

復次,這裡所說的「離欲」,欲有二種:一、煩惱欲,二、事欲。「離」也有二種:一、相應離,二、境界離。

二、初靜慮——逐句解定型句

「離惡不善法」:「煩惱欲」為因所生的種種惡不善法,即身惡行、語惡行等,乃至持杖、持刀、鬪訟、諍競、諂誑、詐偽、起妄語等;由斷除這些,名為「離惡不善法」。 「有尋有伺」:因為對「尋、伺」還沒見到過失,且自地(初靜慮)還有「能對治欲界」的諸善尋伺,所以名為「有尋有伺」。 「離」:就是已獲得加行究竟作意。「生」:由此(加行究竟作意)為因、為緣,無間所生〔的初靜慮〕,所以名為「離生」。 「喜樂」:已獲得所希求的義利,又對「喜」還沒見到過失,一切麁重都已除遣,又已獲得廣大的輕安、身心調暢、有堪能性,所以名為「喜樂」。 「初」:從欲界最初向上進、最先獲得,依順著次第數,所以名為「初」。「靜慮」:於一個所緣繫念寂靜、正審思慮,所以名為「靜慮」。 「具足」:就是已獲得加行究竟果作意。 「安住」:後時由於多多修習、多有成辦,能得隨所樂、得無艱難、得無梗澁——對這靜慮定,其心晝夜都能正隨順、趣向、臨入,隨所欲樂,乃至七日七夜都能正安住,所以名為「安住」。

三、第二靜慮

對「有尋有伺」的三摩地相,心能棄捨;對「無尋無伺」的三摩地相,繫念安住;對匆遽所行的境界能正遠離,對不匆遽所行的境界安住其心,一味寂靜、極寂靜地運轉——所以說「尋伺寂靜故、內等淨故」。 又他即於「無尋無伺」三摩地中數數修習,超過了「尋伺有間缺」之位,能正獲得「無間缺」之位——所以說「心一趣故」。 「無尋無伺」:一切尋、伺都已斷。 「定」:就是已獲得加行究竟作意。「生」:由此為因、為緣,無間所生,所以名為「定生」。 「喜樂」:已獲得所希求的義利,又對「喜」還沒見到過失,有欣有喜;一切尋伺、初靜慮地的諸煩惱品所有麁重都已遠離,能對治那些的廣大輕安、身心調柔、有堪能樂相隨逐,所以名為「有喜樂」。 依順著次第數,這是「第二」。如此一切,如前(初靜慮)應知。

四、第三靜慮

他對「喜」相深見過失,所以說「於喜離欲」。又這時遠離了二種亂心的災患,能於「離喜」的第三靜慮攝持其心,所以說「安住於捨」。〔哪二種亂心?〕第二靜慮已離了尋、伺,如今這裡又離了喜——這二法(尋伺、喜)都能擾亂心、障礙「無間捨」:初靜慮中有尋伺,令無間捨不自在轉;第二靜慮中有喜,令無間捨不自在轉。由這因緣,這「捨」,初、二靜慮中說它沒有;修靜慮的人,到第三靜慮才名為「有捨」。 由於有捨,便能如如安住所有的正念,這樣那「喜俱行的想及作意」就不再現行。若於這第三靜慮不善修習,或時失念,那喜俱行的想及作意又時時現行,他便速疾以慧通達、正了知,隨所生起的都能不忍受,方便棄捨、除遣、變吐,心住於「上捨」——所以說「有正念、正知」。 他這時,住於這樣的捨、正念、正知,親近、修習、多修習,便令心踊躍俱行的「喜受」得以除滅;離喜而寂靜、最極寂靜,與喜相違的「心受」生起。他這時,色身、意身領納「受樂」及「輕安樂」——所以說「有身受樂」。 第三靜慮以下諸地,沒有這樣的樂、也沒有無間捨;第三靜慮以上諸地,無間捨雖也可得,卻沒有樂。下地樂、捨都沒有,上地有捨而無樂,所以說「於是處所,謂第三靜慮,諸聖宣說」——就是:依於此(第三靜慮)已得安住的補特伽羅,具足捨、念及正知,住於身受樂,第三靜慮具足安住。所說的「諸聖」,就是佛世尊及佛弟子。

五、第四靜慮

這裡因為對治的種類、勢用相似,所以略不宣說「樂斷」的對治,只說對治所作的「樂斷」。什麼是這裡的對治?就是捨、念、及正知。由即於此數數修習,便能棄捨「令不出離第三靜慮」的、第三靜慮地中的勝樂——所以說「由樂斷故」。修靜慮的人,這時所有的苦、樂都得超越。由這因緣,把先前所斷、如今所斷總集起來說,便說「樂斷、苦斷,先喜憂沒」:就是入第四靜慮定時樂受斷,入第二靜慮定時苦受斷,入第三靜慮定時喜受沒,入初靜慮定時憂受沒。如今這裡,且就苦、樂二受斷而說,故說有其餘的「非苦樂受」——所以說「彼於爾時不苦不樂」。 從初靜慮以來,一切下地的災患(尋、伺、喜樂、入息、出息)都已斷;由它們斷故,這裡「捨念清淨鮮白」。由這因緣,正入第四靜慮定時,心住無動,一切動亂都遠離——所以說「捨念清淨」。「第四」等字,如前所說初靜慮等,應知其相。

六、四無色

(一)空無邊處。由於對「虛空」起勝解,所有青、黃、赤、白等相應的顯色想,由於不顯現、又厭離欲,都能超越——所以說「色想出過故」。由不顯現、超越那(顯色)想為因,所有種種眾多品類、因諸顯色和合積集而有的「障礙想」都得除遣——所以說「有對想滅沒故」。由遠離那(障礙)想為因,所有於那種種聚中轉起的「差別想」(即飲、食、瓶、衣、乘、莊嚴具、城、舍、軍、園、山、林等想),於這一切都不作意——所以說「種種想不作意故」。除遣了這樣的有色、有對的種種想,便起「無邊相」的虛空勝解——所以說「入無邊空」。由已超過近分的加行究竟作意、入上地根本的加行究竟果作意定——所以說「空無邊處具足安住」。當知這裡,依於近分、乃至未入上地根本定時,唯緣虛空;若已得入上地根本定,則亦緣虛空、亦緣自地所有諸蘊;又近分中,也緣下地所有諸蘊。 (二)識無邊處。若由此「識」對「無邊空」發起勝解,當知此識與「無邊空相勝解」相應。若有意入識無邊處,先捨「虛空無邊處想」,即於那「識」,次起「無邊行相」的勝解。這時超過了近分、根本的空無邊處——所以說「超過一切空無邊處,入無邊識」。由超過識無邊處所有的近分、乃至加行究竟作意,入上地根本的加行究竟果作意定——所以說「識無邊處具足安住」。 (三)無所有處。從識無邊處求上進時,離那「識」之外更求其餘的境,都無所得(即諸所有或色、或非色相應的境性)。他求境界無所得時,超過近分及根本的識無邊處,發起「都無餘境」的勝解,這就名為「於無所有的假想勝解」。即於這樣的假想勝解多修習,便能超過無所有處的一切近分、乃至加行究竟作意,入那根本的加行究竟果作意定——所以說「超過一切識無邊處,無少所有,無所有處具足安住」。 (四)非想非非想處。從無所有處求上進時,由於對「無所有處想」起了麁想,便能棄捨無所有處想。由這因緣,先入無所有處定時超過了「一切有所有想」,如今又超過「無所有想」——所以說「非有想」(即不是「有所有想」、也不是「無所有想」);「非無想」(即不像無想定及滅盡定那樣,一切諸想都滅盡),唯有微細的想緣「無相境」而轉——所以說「非想非非想」。即於此處起勝解時,超過一切近分、根本的無所有處,及非想非非想處的近分、乃至加行究竟作意,入那根本的加行究竟果作意定——所以說「超過一切無所有處,於非想非非想處具足安住」。 〔總結相狀〕這裡入靜慮定時,其身相狀如處室中;入無色定時,其身相狀如處虛空。當知這裡,由「奢摩他相」安住於上捨、勤修加行。

七、二無心定

復次,依靜慮等,當知能入二種無心定:一、無想定,二、滅盡定。 無想定:唯諸異生(凡夫),由「棄背想作意」的方便能入。滅盡定:唯諸聖者,由「止息想受作意」的方便能入。這二定,由二種作意的方便能入。  無想定:由「棄背想作意」為上首,勤修加行,漸次能入。滅盡定:由從非想非非想處欲求上進、暫時「止息所緣作意」為上首,勤修加行,漸次能入。  〔無想定〕若諸異生作這樣的念:「諸想如病、諸想如癰、諸想如箭,唯有『無想』寂靜微妙」,便攝受這樣的「背想作意」,於所生起的一切想中,精勤修習「不念作意」。由此修習為因緣,加行道中還是「有心位」,入定無間,心便不再轉。如此以「出離想作意」為先,已離遍淨〔天〕貪、還沒離廣果〔天〕貪,諸心、心法滅,這名為無想定;由這方便證得此定。  〔滅盡定〕若諸聖者,已得非想非非想處,又欲暫時住於寂靜住,從「非有想非無想處」心求上進;心上進時,求上所緣竟無所得;無所得故,〔心〕滅而不轉。如此,已離無所有處貪的有學、或阿羅漢,以「求暫住想作意」為先,諸心、心法滅,這名為滅盡定;由這方便證得此定。

八、依靜慮發五神通——修十二想

復次,依止靜慮能發起五通等。怎麼能發?就是修靜慮的人已得「根本清淨靜慮」,即以這清淨靜慮為所依止,對「五通增上」的正法聽聞、受持,令善究竟——即對神境通、宿住通、天耳通、死生智通、心差別通等作意思惟。又由定地所起的作意,了知於義、了知於法;由了知義、法,便如此這般地修治其心;由此修習、多修習,便有時、有分發起修果的「五神通」等。  又即如此了知義、法,為引發諸神通等,要修「十二想」。哪十二?一、輕舉想,二、柔軟想,三、空界想,四、身心符順想,五、勝解想,六、先所受行次第隨念想,七、種種品類集會音聲想,八、光明色相想,九、煩惱所作色變異想,十、解脫想,十一、勝處想,十二、遍處想。

一、輕舉想:由此想,於身發起「輕舉」的勝解——如妬羅綿、如疊絮、或似風輪;發起這輕的勝解後,由勝解作意,便能於彼彼處飄轉其身(如從床上飄到几上、又從几上飄到床上;從床飄到草座、又從草座飄到床)。 二、柔軟想:由此想,於身發起「柔軟」的勝解——如綿囊、如毛毳、或如熟練(柔熟之物)。這柔軟想能長養、攝受前面的輕舉想,於攝受時令輕舉想增長廣大。 三、空界想:由此想,先於自身發起輕舉、柔軟二勝解後,隨所欲往,若中間有諸色聚能作障礙,這時便起勝解作意,於那色中作「空」的勝解,便能無礙而往。 四、身心符順想:由此想,或以心符順於身,或以身符順於心;由此令身轉轉輕舉、轉轉柔軟、轉轉堪任、轉轉光潔,隨順於心、繫屬於心、依心而轉。 五、勝解想:由此想,能「遠作近解、近作遠解,麁作細解、細作麁解,地作水解、水作地解」,如此一一差別的大種展轉相作(廣如「變化所作勝解」——或色變化、或聲變化)。由前述〔輕舉·柔軟·空界·身心符順·勝解〕這五想修習成滿,便領受種種勝妙的「神境通」:或從一身示現多身(由「現化勝解想」),或從多身示現一身(由「隱化勝解想」);或以身於牆壁、垣城等厚障隔事直過無礙;或於地出沒如水;或於水斷流往返、履水如地;或如飛鳥結加趺坐騰颺虛空;或對廣大威德勢力的日月光輪以手捫摸;或以其身乃至梵世自在迴轉。當知這種種神變,都由輕舉、柔軟、空界、身心符順想所攝受的勝解想,隨其所應一切能作。這裡以身於梵世,略有二種自在迴轉:一、往來自在迴轉;二、於梵世諸四大種的一分造色,如其所樂、隨勝解力自在迴轉。 六、先所受行次第隨念想:由此想,從童子位直到今日,隨憶念而轉、自在無礙;隨那彼彼位,無論行、住、坐、臥,廣說一切先前所經行的事,隨其麁略、次第不越,憶念了知;於此修習、多修習,證得修果——對無量種宿世所住,廣說乃至所有行相、所有宣說,皆能隨念〔即宿住通〕。 七、種種品類集會音聲想:由此想,遍於彼彼村邑、聚落,或長者眾、或邑義眾、或其餘大眾、或廣長處、或家、或室,種種品類諸眾集會所出的種種雜類音聲、名為諠譟的聲,或大河眾流激湍波浪的音聲,善取其相;以修所成的定地作意,對諸天、人,若遠若近、聖聲非聖聲,力勵聽採;於此修習、多修習,證得修果的清淨「天耳」,由是能聞人間、天上若遠若近一切音聲〔即天耳通〕。 八、光明色相想:對如前所說種種諸光明相極善取後,即於那相作意思惟;又對種種諸有情類善、不善等業用差別善取其相,即於那相作意思惟,這名為光明色相想;於此修習、多修習,證得修果的「死生智通」,由是以清淨天眼通,見諸有情,廣說乃至身壞已後往生善趣天世間中〔即死生智通/天眼通〕。 九、煩惱所作色變異想:由此想,對被貪、恚、癡、忿、恨、覆、惱、誑、諂、慳、嫉,及憍、害、無慚、無愧諸餘煩惱及隨煩惱纏繞其心的諸有情類,其種種色位、色相的變異,解了分別——如有貪欲者,諸根躁擾、諸根掉舉、言常含笑;有瞋恚者,面恒顰蹙、語音謇澁、言常變色;有愚癡者,多分瘖瘂、事義闇昧、言不辯了、語多下里(粗俗);由如此等行相流類,廣說乃至被無慚愧等所纏繞者的色位色相變異,善取其相,又於那相作意思惟;於此修習、多修習,發起修果的「心差別智」,由此智,對他有情、補特伽羅隨所尋思、伺察的心、意、識等,皆如實知〔即心差別通〕。 十、十一、十二、解脫想、勝處想、遍處想:如前「三摩呬多地」所說,應知其修相。由對這〔解脫·勝處·遍處〕想親近、修習、多修習,能引最勝的諸聖神通——即變事通、化事通、勝解通,及能引發無諍、願智、四無礙解(法無礙解、義無礙解、辭無礙解、辯無礙解)等種種功德。  又「聖、非聖」二種神境通有差別:聖神通,隨所變事、所化事、所勝解,一切都能如實成辦、無有改異、堪任有用;非聖神通則不能如此,猶如幻化,唯可觀見、不堪受用。  當知這十二種想,親近、修習、多修習,隨其所應便能引發五種神通,及能引發「不共異生」(凡夫所無)的、如其所應的諸聖功德。

九、生差別——修諸定當生諸天

復次,這裡:於初靜慮下、中、上品善修習,隨其所應,當生「梵眾天、梵輔天、大梵天」眾同分中;於第二靜慮下中上品善修習,當生「少光天、無量光天、極光淨天」眾同分中;於第三靜慮下中上品善修習,當生「少淨天、無量淨天、遍淨天」眾同分中;於第四靜慮下中上品善修習,當生「無雲天、福生天、廣果天」眾同分中。若是不還者,以「無漏第四靜慮」間雜熏修「有漏第四靜慮」,即於其中下品、中品、上品、上勝品、上極品善修習,隨其所應當生「五淨居天」眾同分中(即無煩、無熱、善現、善見、色究竟天)。若於空處、識處、無所有處、非想非非想處下中上品善修習,當生空處、識處、無所有處、非想非非想處的「隨行天」眾同分中——由那些天無有形色,所以也無處所差別,然而所住所作有其差別。於無想定善修習,當生「無想有情天」眾同分中。

十、離欲者相

復次,這裡怎麼知道「離欲者」的相?就是:離欲的人,身業安住,諸根無動,威儀進止無有躁擾,於一種威儀能經久時,不多驚懼,終不數數變換威儀;言詞柔軟、言詞寂靜,不樂諠雜、不樂眾集,言語安詳;眼見色後,唯覺了色,不因覺了而起色貪——如此耳聞聲、鼻嗅香、舌甞味、身覺觸後,唯覺了聲乃至覺了觸,不因覺了而起聲貪乃至觸貪;能無所畏,覺慧幽深,輕安廣大,身心隱密,無有貪婪、無有憤發,能有堪忍,不被種種欲尋思等諸惡尋思擾亂其心。如此等類,當知名為離欲者的相。

Carrying on from the previous leaf ("freedom from desire by the seven attentions"), this leaf extensively analyzes the concentrations that are thereby attained: first it glosses phrase by phrase the fixed formulas of the four meditative absorptions (born of seclusion, joy and bliss … the purity of equanimity and mindfulness), then it treats the four formless attainments (from the base of infinite space up to the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception), the two mindless attainments (the attainment of no-perception · the attainment of cessation), the five supernormal powers issued in dependence on the meditative absorptions (cultivating the twelve conceptions), and the several heavens into which one who cultivates the concentrations is due to be reborn (the differences of rebirth); it closes by stating the marks of one freed from desire. The technical terms are kept as of old, glossed phrase by phrase in present-day language, without adding doctrinal exposition, without citing the treatise-commentaries, without annotating Sanskrit; where the treatise-text compresses, the sense is filled back in with 〔brackets〕.

1. The Two Kinds of Desire, the Two Kinds of Freedom

Further, the "desire" spoken of here is of two kinds: first, the desire of affliction; second, the desire for things. "Freedom" too is of two kinds: first, freedom by way of association; second, freedom by way of the object-realm.

2. The First Meditative Absorption — Its Fixed Formula Glossed Phrase by Phrase

"Secluded from evil, unwholesome states": the various evil, unwholesome states produced with the "desire of affliction" as their cause — that is, bodily misconduct, verbal misconduct, and the rest, extending to the wielding of clubs, the wielding of blades, brawling, quarreling, contention, flattery, deceit, fraud, the raising of false speech, and so on; because these are cut off, this is named "secluded from evil, unwholesome states." "With applied and sustained thought": because one has not yet seen the fault in "applied thought and sustained thought," and because at one's own stage (the first meditative absorption) there are still wholesome applied and sustained thoughts "able to counteract the desire-realm," this is named "with applied and sustained thought." "Secluded": this is having obtained the attention of the culmination of effort. "Born": because, with this (the attention of the culmination of effort) as cause and as condition, 〔the first meditative absorption〕 is produced without interval, it is named "born of seclusion." "Joy and bliss": because one has obtained the aim-and-benefit one had sought, and moreover has not yet seen the fault in "joy," and all coarseness-and-heaviness has been dispelled, and one has moreover obtained a vast pliancy, a well-attuned harmony of body and mind, and the quality of being fit for work — this is named "joy and bliss." "First": because it advances upward from the desire-realm for the very first, is the first obtained, and is counted following the sequence, it is named "first." "Meditative absorption": because upon a single object one fixes mindfulness in stillness and correctly examines and reflects, it is named "meditative absorption." "Fully possessing": this is having obtained the attention that is the fruit of the culmination of effort. "Dwelling settled": because at a later time, through much cultivation and much accomplishment, one is able to attain it as one pleases, to attain it without difficulty, to attain it without obstruction or roughness — with regard to this absorption-concentration, one's mind can correctly, day and night, accord with it, tend toward it, and enter upon it, as one pleases and delights, up to seven days and seven nights being able to dwell settled in it correctly — this is named "dwelling settled."

3. The Second Meditative Absorption

Toward the samādhi-mark of "applied and sustained thought" the mind is able to cast off; toward the samādhi-mark of "neither applied nor sustained thought" it fixes mindfulness and dwells settled; from the object-realm coursed through in haste it correctly withdraws, and upon the object-realm coursed through without haste it settles its mind, coursing on in a single savor of stillness, of utmost stillness — and so it is said "because applied and sustained thought have become still, and because of inner unified purity." Again, within this samādhi of "neither applied nor sustained thought" one cultivates it again and again, surpasses the phase of "applied and sustained thought with intervals and gaps," and is able to obtain correctly the phase "without intervals and gaps" — and so it is said "because the mind has a single tendency." "Neither applied nor sustained thought": all applied and sustained thought has been cut off. "Concentration": this is having obtained the attention of the culmination of effort. "Born": because, with this as cause and as condition, it is produced without interval, it is named "born of concentration." "Joy and bliss": because one has obtained the aim-and-benefit one had sought, and moreover has not yet seen the fault in "joy," and there is delight and there is joy; and all the coarseness-and-heaviness belonging to the afflictive class of applied and sustained thought and of the ground of the first meditative absorption has been left behind, and the vast pliancy that counteracts them, the pliant harmony of body and mind, the blissful mark of being fit for work, follow along in train — this is named "having joy and bliss." Counted following the sequence, this is the "second." All of this is to be understood as before (the first meditative absorption).

4. The Third Meditative Absorption

He sees deeply the fault in the "joy"-mark, and so it is said "having become free of desire for joy." Moreover, at this time, having left behind the two kinds of calamity that disturb the mind, he is able to hold his mind upon the third meditative absorption that is "secluded from joy," and so it is said "dwelling settled in equanimity." 〔Which two kinds of mind-disturbing?〕 In the second meditative absorption he had already left behind applied and sustained thought; now, here, he further leaves behind joy — and these two states (applied-and-sustained thought, and joy) are both able to disturb the mind and obstruct "uninterrupted equanimity": in the first meditative absorption there are applied and sustained thought, causing the uninterrupted equanimity not to course freely; in the second meditative absorption there is joy, causing the uninterrupted equanimity not to course freely. For this reason, this "equanimity" is said, in the first and second meditative absorptions, not to be present; only when the cultivator of meditative absorption reaches the third meditative absorption is he named "having equanimity." Because he has equanimity, he is then able to dwell settled, just so, in all the correct mindfulness; and thus that "conception and attention conjoined with joy" no longer becomes active. Should he, in this third meditative absorption, cultivate poorly, then at times he loses mindfulness, and that conception and attention conjoined with joy again becomes active from time to time; he then swiftly, by insight, penetrates and correctly knows it, and whatever arises he is able not to endure — he casts it off, dispels it, and vomits it out by skillful means, and his mind dwells in "superior equanimity" — and so it is said "having correct mindfulness and correct knowing." He, at this time, dwelling thus in equanimity, correct mindfulness, and correct knowing, drawing near, cultivating, and cultivating much, brings it about that the "feeling of joy" conjoined with the mind's leaping-up is extinguished; secluded from joy, still and utterly still, a "mental feeling" contrary to joy arises. He, at this time, has his physical body and mental body take in "the bliss of feeling" and "the bliss of pliancy" — and so it is said "having bodily-felt bliss." The grounds below the third meditative absorption have neither this bliss nor uninterrupted equanimity; the grounds above the third meditative absorption, though uninterrupted equanimity may be found there too, have no bliss. The lower grounds have neither bliss nor equanimity, the higher grounds have equanimity without bliss, and so it is said "in this place, namely the third meditative absorption, the noble ones proclaim" — that is: in dependence on this (the third meditative absorption), the person who has attained dwelling, fully possessed of equanimity, mindfulness, and correct knowing, dwelling in bodily-felt bliss, dwells fully possessed of the third meditative absorption. The "noble ones" spoken of are the Buddha, the World-Honored One, and the Buddha's disciples.

5. The Fourth Meditative Absorption

Here, because the kind and the operative force of the counteragent are similar, it briefly does not proclaim the counteragent for "the cutting-off of bliss," and states only the "cutting-off of bliss" that the counteragent brings about. What is the counteragent here? It is equanimity, mindfulness, and correct knowing. By cultivating just this again and again, one is then able to cast off the superior bliss belonging to the ground of the third meditative absorption, the bliss that "keeps one from departing the third meditative absorption" — and so it is said "because of the cutting-off of bliss." The cultivator of meditative absorption, at this time, transcends all the pain and bliss he had. For this reason, gathering together in sum what was cut off before and what is cut off now, it is said "the cutting-off of bliss, the cutting-off of pain, the prior sinking-away of joy and sorrow": that is, when one enters the concentration of the fourth meditative absorption the feeling of bliss is cut off; when one enters the concentration of the second meditative absorption the feeling of pain is cut off; when one enters the concentration of the third meditative absorption the feeling of joy sinks away; when one enters the concentration of the first meditative absorption the feeling of sorrow sinks away. Now, here, it speaks with respect to the cutting-off of just the two feelings of pain and bliss, and so it states that there remains a further "feeling that is neither pain nor bliss" — and so it is said "he, at that time, is neither in pain nor in bliss." From the first meditative absorption onward, all the calamities of the lower grounds (applied thought, sustained thought, joy and bliss, in-breath, out-breath) have been cut off; because they are cut off, here there is "purity, mindfulness, purified and made clear-white." For this reason, when one correctly enters the concentration of the fourth meditative absorption, the mind dwells unmoving, and all agitation is left behind — and so it is said "the purity of equanimity and mindfulness." As for the words "fourth" and so on, their mark is to be understood as with "first meditative absorption" and the rest stated before.

6. The Four Formless Attainments

(1) The base of infinite space. Because one gives rise to a resolute conviction toward "empty space," all the conceptions of the manifest colors associated with blue, yellow, red, white, and the rest, by their not appearing and by aversion-and-freedom-from-desire, are able to be transcended — and so it is said "because the conception of form is passed beyond." Because that non-appearance, that transcending of the conception 〔of manifest color〕, is the cause, all the "conceptions of resistance" — the manifold sorts arising from the aggregation-and-accumulation of the manifest colors together — are able to be dispelled — and so it is said "because the conception of resistance is extinguished." Because leaving behind that conception 〔of resistance〕 is the cause, all the "conceptions of difference" that arise with respect to those manifold aggregations (that is, the conceptions of drink, food, jar, garment, vehicle, ornament, city, house, army, park, mountain, forest, and the like), toward all of these one does not give attention — and so it is said "because one gives no attention to the manifold conceptions." Having dispelled such manifold conceptions of what-has-form and what-is-resistant, one then gives rise to a resolute conviction of "space" as the "mark of the infinite" — and so it is said "one enters upon infinite space." Because one has passed beyond the attention of the culmination of effort of the access [-concentration], and entered the concentration of the attention that is the fruit of the culmination of effort of the root [-absorption] of the higher ground — and so it is said "one dwells fully possessed of the base of infinite space." Here it should be known: in dependence on the access [-concentration], and up until one has not yet entered the root [-absorption] of the higher ground, one takes only space as object; if one has already entered the root [-absorption] of the higher ground, then one takes as object both space and all the aggregates of one's own ground; and in the access [-concentration], one also takes as object all the aggregates of the lower ground. (2) The base of infinite consciousness. If, by this "consciousness," one gives rise to a resolute conviction toward "infinite space," it should be known that this consciousness is associated with the "resolute conviction of the mark of infinite space." If one intends to enter the base of infinite consciousness, one first casts off the "conception of the base of infinite space," and then, with respect to that "consciousness," gives rise to a resolute conviction of the "mark of the infinite." At this time one has passed beyond the access [-concentration] and the root [-absorption] of the base of infinite space — and so it is said "passing beyond all the base of infinite space, one enters upon infinite consciousness." Because one passes beyond all the attention from the access [-concentration] up to the culmination of effort belonging to the base of infinite consciousness, and enters the concentration of the attention that is the fruit of the culmination of effort of the root [-absorption] of the higher ground — and so it is said "one dwells fully possessed of the base of infinite consciousness." (3) The base of nothingness. When, seeking to advance upward from the base of infinite consciousness, one seeks, apart from that "consciousness," some further object, one obtains nothing at all (that is, whatever there is of the objecthood associated with form or with the formless). When he seeks the object-realm and obtains nothing, he passes beyond the access [-concentration] and the root [-absorption] of the base of infinite consciousness, and gives rise to a resolute conviction that "there is no remaining object at all"; this is named "the resolute conviction, by imagined supposition, of nothingness." By cultivating much just this resolute conviction by imagined supposition, one is then able to pass beyond all the access [-concentration] up to the culmination-of-effort attention of the base of nothingness, and enter that concentration of the attention that is the fruit of the culmination of effort of the root [-absorption] — and so it is said "passing beyond all the base of infinite consciousness, having no least thing whatsoever, one dwells fully possessed of the base of nothingness." (4) The base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception. When, seeking to advance upward from the base of nothingness, one gives rise to a coarse conception toward the "conception of the base of nothingness," one is then able to cast off the conception of the base of nothingness. For this reason, when one first entered the concentration of the base of nothingness one passed beyond "all conception that there is anything at all," and now one further passes beyond the "conception of nothingness" — and so it is said "not having perception" (that is, it is neither the "conception that there is anything at all" nor the "conception of nothingness"); "not being without perception" (that is, it is not like the attainment of no-perception and the attainment of cessation, where all the conceptions altogether are extinguished), for there is only a subtle conception coursing with respect to the "object that is without mark" — and so it is said "neither-perception-nor-non-perception." When, right here, one gives rise to a resolute conviction, one passes beyond all the access [-concentration] and root [-absorption] of the base of nothingness, and the access [-concentration] up to the culmination-of-effort attention of the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, and enters that concentration of the attention that is the fruit of the culmination of effort of the root [-absorption] — and so it is said "passing beyond all the base of nothingness, one dwells fully possessed of the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception." 〔A summing-up of the marks〕 Here, when one enters the concentration of the meditative absorptions, the mark of one's body is as though situated within a chamber; when one enters the formless concentrations, the mark of one's body is as though situated within empty space. Here it should be known: by the "mark of quiescence (śamatha)" one dwells settled in superior equanimity and diligently cultivates the effort.

7. The Two Mindless Attainments

Further, in dependence on the meditative absorptions and the rest, it should be known that one is able to enter two kinds of mindless attainment: first, the attainment of no-perception; second, the attainment of cessation. The attainment of no-perception: only the various ordinary beings (worldlings), by the skillful means of the "attention that turns away from perception," are able to enter it. The attainment of cessation: only the various noble ones, by the skillful means of the "attention that stills perception and feeling," are able to enter it. These two attainments are entered by the skillful means of two kinds of attention.  The attainment of no-perception: with the "attention that turns away from perception" as its foremost, diligently cultivating the effort, one is able to enter it by degrees. The attainment of cessation: with the "attention that stills the object for a while," foremost, at the point of seeking to advance upward from the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, diligently cultivating the effort, one is able to enter it by degrees.  〔The attainment of no-perception〕 If the various ordinary beings form this thought: "Perceptions are like a disease, perceptions are like a boil, perceptions are like an arrow; only 'no-perception' is still, subtle, and sublime," they then take up such an "attention that turns from perception," and, with respect to all the perceptions that arise, diligently cultivate the "attention of non-attending." Because of this cultivation as cause-and-condition, on the path of effort there is still a "phase with mind"; then, without interval upon entering the attainment, the mind no longer turns. In this way, with the "attention of departing perception" as the forerunner, one who has become free of desire for the Heaven of Universal Purity 〔but〕 not yet free of desire for the Heaven of Great Fruit, has his minds and mental factors cease — this is named the attainment of no-perception; by this skillful means one realizes this attainment.  〔The attainment of cessation〕 If the various noble ones, having attained the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, further wish to dwell for a while in the "dwelling of stillness," seek from the "base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception" mind to advance upward; and when the mind advances upward, it seeks the higher object and obtains nothing at all; because it obtains nothing, 〔the mind〕 ceases and does not turn. In this way, one who is free of desire for the base of nothingness — whether a trainee, or an arhat — with the "attention that seeks to dwell for a while" as the forerunner, has his minds and mental factors cease — this is named the attainment of cessation; by this skillful means one realizes this attainment.

8. Issuing the Five Supernormal Powers in Dependence on the Meditative Absorptions — Cultivating the Twelve Conceptions

Further, in dependence on the meditative absorptions one is able to issue the five supernormal powers and the rest. How is one able to issue them? It is that the cultivator of meditative absorption, having obtained the "root, pure meditative absorption," takes just this pure meditative absorption as his basis, and toward the true Dharma that is "superior in issuing the five powers" listens, receives, and upholds it, bringing it to a good culmination — that is, he gives attention to and contemplates the supernormal power of the divine bases, the supernormal power of former abodes, the supernormal power of the divine ear, the supernormal knowledge of death and rebirth, the supernormal power of the differences of mind, and the rest. Moreover, by the attention arisen from the concentration-ground he knows the meaning and knows the Dharma; by knowing the meaning and the Dharma, he then works upon his mind in just this way; by this cultivation and much cultivation, he then, at a certain time and in a certain measure, issues the five supernormal powers of the fruit of cultivation, and the rest.  Moreover, knowing the meaning and the Dharma in just this way, in order to draw forth the supernormal powers and the rest, one must cultivate the "twelve conceptions." Which twelve? First, the conception of lightness-and-buoyancy; second, the conception of softness; third, the conception of the element of space; fourth, the conception of the mutual conforming of body and mind; fifth, the conception of resolute conviction; sixth, the conception of recollecting in sequence what one has formerly undergone and done; seventh, the conception of the sounds of the gatherings of the manifold sorts; eighth, the conception of the marks of light and color; ninth, the conception of the alterations of color wrought by the afflictions; tenth, the conception of liberation; eleventh, the conception of the dominant bases; twelfth, the conception of the totalities.

One, the conception of lightness-and-buoyancy: by this conception, one gives rise, with respect to the body, to a resolute conviction of "lightness-and-buoyancy" — like tūla-cotton, like folded floss, or as though a wheel of wind; and having given rise to this resolute conviction of lightness, by the resolute-conviction attention one is then able to float and shift one's body from this place to that (as from atop a bed floating to atop a low table, and again from atop the low table floating to the bed; from the bed floating to a grass mat, and again from the grass mat floating to the bed). Two, the conception of softness: by this conception, one gives rise, with respect to the body, to a resolute conviction of "softness" — like a floss-sack, like fur-down, or like well-worked [soft material]. This conception of softness is able to nourish and take up the preceding conception of lightness-and-buoyancy, and in taking it up causes the conception of lightness-and-buoyancy to grow and become vast. Three, the conception of the element of space: by this conception, having first given rise, with respect to one's own body, to the two resolute convictions of lightness-and-buoyancy and softness, one goes wherever one wishes; and if in between there are aggregations of matter able to obstruct, at this time one gives rise to the resolute-conviction attention, forms a resolute conviction of "space" with respect to that matter, and is then able to go on unobstructed. Four, the conception of the mutual conforming of body and mind: by this conception, one either makes the mind conform to the body, or makes the body conform to the mind; by this one causes the body to become more and more light-and-buoyant, more and more soft, more and more capable, more and more bright-and-clean, according with the mind, bound to the mind, turning in dependence on the mind. Five, the conception of resolute conviction: by this conception, one is able to "resolve the far as near and the near as far, resolve the coarse as fine and the fine as coarse, resolve earth as water and water as earth," and thus each and every one of the great elements is made, in turn, into another (in full, as in "the resolute conviction of transformations made" — whether the transformation of color, or the transformation of sound). By the cultivation to fullness of these five conceptions 〔lightness-and-buoyancy · softness · the element of space · the mutual conforming of body and mind · resolute conviction〕, one then experiences the manifold, superb-and-sublime "supernormal power of the divine bases": whether manifesting many bodies from one body (by the "resolute conviction of manifesting transformations"), or manifesting one body from many bodies (by the "resolute conviction of concealing transformations"); or passing straight through, unobstructed, with one's body through thick obstacles-and-partitions such as walls, ramparts, and cities; or emerging and submerging in the earth as though in water; or cutting off the flow of water to go to and fro upon it, treading on water as on earth; or, like a flying bird, sitting cross-legged and soaring aloft in empty space; or touching with the hand the orbs of the sun and moon, of vast majestic power and might; or with one's body freely revolving as far as the Brahma-world. It should be known that these manifold supernormal transformations are all done by the resolute-conviction conception taken up by the conceptions of lightness-and-buoyancy, softness, the element of space, and the mutual conforming of body and mind, each accomplishing all according to what befits it. Here, with the body in the Brahma-world, there are in brief two kinds of free revolving: first, the free revolving of coming and going; second, the free revolving, according to one's pleasure and by the force of resolute conviction, of one portion of the derived matter of the four great elements of the Brahma-world. Six, the conception of recollecting in sequence what one has formerly undergone and done: by this conception, from the state of a young child down to the present day, one turns as one recollects, freely and without obstruction; according to this or that state, whether walking, standing, sitting, or lying down — in full, all the matters one has formerly passed through — according to their coarseness or brevity, in sequence and without skipping, one recollects and knows them; by cultivating this and cultivating it much, one realizes the fruit of cultivation — being able to recollect the measureless kinds of one's former abodes, in full down to all their modes and all their statements 〔that is, the supernormal power of former abodes〕. Seven, the conception of the sounds of the gatherings of the manifold sorts: by this conception, throughout this and that village, town, or hamlet, whether a gathering of elders, or an assembly of a town's association, or some other great assembly, or a broad and long place, or a household, or a chamber, the manifold sorts of assemblies-of-many give forth manifold mixed kinds of sound, called the sound of clamor, or the sound of the surging rapids and waves of the great rivers and streams; one grasps their mark well; and by the concentration-ground attention attained through cultivation, toward the gods and humans, whether far or near, noble sounds and un-noble sounds, one listens and takes them up with effort; by cultivating this and cultivating it much, one realizes the pure "divine ear" that is the fruit of cultivation, whereby one is able to hear all the sounds of the human world and the heavens above, whether far or near 〔that is, the supernormal power of the divine ear〕. Eight, the conception of the marks of light and color: having grasped exceedingly well the manifold marks of light as stated before, one gives attention to and contemplates just that mark; and moreover, having grasped well the marks of the distinctions in the karmic activity — wholesome, unwholesome, and the rest — of the manifold classes of sentient beings, one gives attention to and contemplates just that mark; this is named the conception of the marks of light and color; by cultivating this and cultivating it much, one realizes the "supernormal knowledge of death and rebirth" that is the fruit of cultivation, whereby, with the pure divine eye, one sees the sentient beings, in full down to their being reborn, after the body has broken up, into the heavenly worlds of the good destinies 〔that is, the supernormal knowledge of death and rebirth / the divine eye〕. Nine, the conception of the alterations of color wrought by the afflictions: by this conception, toward the classes of sentient beings whose minds are entangled by greed, hatred, delusion, wrath, rancor, concealment, vexation, deceit, flattery, stinginess, envy, and by conceit, harm, shamelessness, non-embarrassment, and the remaining afflictions and secondary afflictions, one understands and discerns the alterations of the manifold color-states and color-marks 〔of those beings〕 — as, for one with greed-and-desire, the sense-faculties are restless, the sense-faculties are excited, the speech constantly carries a smile; for one with hatred, the face is constantly knit-and-frowning, the voice is halting, the speech constantly changes color; for one with delusion, mostly mute-and-dumb, the matter-and-meaning obscure, the speech unclear, the words much of the low-and-vulgar sort; by such modes and their kinds, in full down to the alterations of the color-states and color-marks of one entangled by shamelessness-and-non-embarrassment and the rest, one grasps their mark well and moreover gives attention to and contemplates just that mark; by cultivating this and cultivating it much, one issues the "knowledge of the differences of mind" that is the fruit of cultivation, whereby, with respect to another sentient being, a person, one knows just as it is, as it is sought-out and examined, that being's mind, mentation, consciousness, and the rest 〔that is, the supernormal power of the differences of mind〕. Ten, eleven, twelve, the conception of liberation, the conception of the dominant bases, the conception of the totalities: as stated before in the "Stage of Meditative Equipoise," their mode of cultivation should be known. By drawing near, cultivating, and cultivating much these 〔conceptions of liberation · the dominant bases · the totalities〕, one is able to draw forth the most excellent noble supernormal powers — namely the supernormal power of transforming things, the supernormal power of the transformation of things, the supernormal power of resolute conviction, and the ability to draw forth non-contention, the knowledge of aspiration, the four unobstructed discernments (the unobstructed discernment of Dharma, the unobstructed discernment of meaning, the unobstructed discernment of expression, the unobstructed discernment of eloquence), and the rest of the manifold qualities.  Moreover, there is a difference between the two kinds of "noble" and "un-noble" supernormal power of the divine bases: the noble supernormal power — with respect to whatever it transforms, whatever it makes into a transformation, whatever it resolves by conviction — is in every case able to accomplish it just as it is, without change or alteration, capable and of use; the un-noble supernormal power is not able to be so, but is like an illusory conjuring, which can only be beheld but is not fit for use.  It should be known that these twelve kinds of conception, by being drawn near, cultivated, and cultivated much, are able, according to what befits each, to draw forth the five kinds of supernormal power, and are able to draw forth the noble qualities, according to what befits them, that are "not shared with ordinary beings" (that which worldlings do not have).

9. The Differences of Rebirth — The Heavens into Which One Cultivating the Concentrations Is Due to Be Reborn

Further, here: by cultivating well the lower, middling, and higher grades of the first meditative absorption, one is, according to what befits it, due to be reborn among the like-portion of the assemblies of "the Heaven of the Brahmā-multitude, the Heaven of the Brahmā-ministers, and the Great Brahmā"; by cultivating well the lower, middling, and higher grades of the second meditative absorption, one is due to be reborn among the like-portion of "the Heaven of Limited Radiance, the Heaven of Measureless Radiance, and the Heaven of Utmost-Pure Radiance"; by cultivating well the lower, middling, and higher grades of the third meditative absorption, one is due to be reborn among the like-portion of "the Heaven of Limited Purity, the Heaven of Measureless Purity, and the Heaven of Universal Purity"; by cultivating well the lower, middling, and higher grades of the fourth meditative absorption, one is due to be reborn among the like-portion of "the Heaven of No Clouds, the Heaven of Merit-Born, and the Heaven of Great Fruit." If one is a non-returner, who by "the uncontaminated fourth meditative absorption" interfusingly perfumes-and-cultivates "the contaminated fourth meditative absorption," then, cultivating well within it the lower grade, the middling grade, the higher grade, the higher-superior grade, and the higher-utmost grade, one is, according to what befits it, due to be reborn among the like-portion of "the Five Pure Abodes" (namely the Heaven of No Affliction, the Heaven of No Heat, the Heaven of Good Manifestation, the Heaven of Good Vision, and the Heaven at the Summit of Form). If one cultivates well the lower, middling, and higher grades of the base of space, the base of consciousness, the base of nothingness, and the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, one is due to be reborn among the like-portion of the "attendant heavens" of the base of space, the base of consciousness, the base of nothingness, and the base of neither-perception-nor-non-perception — because those heavens have no bodily form, there is likewise no difference of location among them; yet what is dwelt in and what is done there has its differences. By cultivating well the attainment of no-perception, one is due to be reborn among the like-portion of "the Heaven of Beings without Perception."

10. The Marks of One Freed from Desire

Further, here, how does one know the marks of "one freed from desire"? It is this: the person freed from desire — his bodily action dwells settled, his sense-faculties are unmoving, his deportment in advancing and halting is without restlessness, and in a single deportment he is able to pass a long time; he is not much startled-or-afraid, and never changes his deportment again and again; his words are soft, his words are still, he does not delight in clamor, does not delight in crowds, and his speech is calm-and-composed; having seen a form with the eye, he only becomes aware of the form, and does not, because of the awareness, give rise to greed for form — and so, likewise, having heard a sound with the ear, smelled a scent with the nose, tasted a flavor with the tongue, felt a touch with the body, he only becomes aware of the sound and so on down to becoming aware of the touch, and does not, because of the awareness, give rise to greed for sound and so on down to greed for touch; he is able to be without any fear, his awareness-and-insight is deep and hidden, his pliancy is vast, his body and mind are hidden-and-secure, he has no covetousness, no fits of anger, is able to be forbearing, and is not disturbed in mind by the manifold desire-thoughts and other evil thoughts. Kinds such as these should be known as the marks of one freed from desire.

聲聞地 · 第四瑜伽處 · 出世間道 · 四諦現觀 · 加行The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · The Fourth Yoga-Station · The Supramundane Path · Direct Realization of the Four Truths · The Preparatory Effort

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

世間道已辯,本葉轉入「出世間道」:依四聖諦境,漸次生起七作意。先說了相作意——以四諦各四行(十六行)覺諦相,於苦諦更開十行觀察、以三量(至教·現見·比度)成立無常,破外道自在論,攝十行為四行;次集、滅、道諦各四行。再說勝解作意(無邊際智·伏我慢·以心緣心),終至加行四善根:煗·頂·忍·世第一法。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回;論本「見此事便念諸行無常·餘如前說」之重複框架逐項保留。

一、出世間道——依四聖諦境起七作意

這是《本地分》〈聲聞地〉第十三的第四瑜伽處第二部分。

世間道已辯說完。若樂往趣出世間道,應當依止「四聖諦」境,漸次生起七種作意——所謂最初的了相作意,到最後的加行究竟果作意,乃至證得阿羅漢果。

二、了相作意——四諦各四行

修瑜伽師,對於四聖諦的略標、廣辯的增上教法,聽聞受持,或對作意已善修習,或已得根本靜慮、無色定。  由四種行了知「苦諦」相:無常行、苦行、空行、無我行。  由四種行了知「集諦」相:因行、集行、起行、緣行。  由四種行了知「滅諦」相:滅行、靜行、妙行、離行。  由四種行了知「道諦」相:道行、如行、行行、出行。 這樣名為了相作意。

三、苦諦——十行觀察、悟入四行

由十種行觀察苦諦,能隨之悟入苦諦的四行。哪十行?一、變異行,二、滅壞行,三、別離行,四、法性行,五、合會行,六、結縛行,七、不可愛行,八、不安隱行,九、無所得行,十、不自在行。這十行,依「證成道理」能正觀察。

(甲)至教量——諸行無常

這裡先依「至教量」之理。如世尊說「諸行無常」。又這些行略有二種:一、有情世間,二、器世間。世尊依有情世間說:「苾芻當知!我以過人的清淨天眼,觀諸有情死時、生時,乃至身壞已後當生善趣天世界中」——由此法門,顯示世尊以淨天眼現見一切有情世間是無常性。又世尊言:「苾芻當知!此器世間長時安住,過此以後漸次乃至七日輪現(如《七日經》廣說),乃至所有大地、諸山、大海及蘇迷盧大寶山王,乃至梵世諸器世界,皆被焚燒;災火滅後,灰燼不現,乃至餘影亦不可得」——由此法門,世尊顯示諸器世間是無常性。如此且依至教量之理,修觀行者由「淨信增上作意力」,對一切行的無常之性獲得決定。

(乙)現見增上——安立內外事

得決定後,即由這淨信增上作意力,數數尋思觀察一切「現見、不背、不由他緣」的無常之性。怎麼數數尋思觀察?就是先安立「內、外」二事。「內事」就是六處等;「外事」有十六種:一、地事(城邑、聚落、舍、市廛等),二、園事(藥草、叢林等),三、山事(種種山的安布差別),四、水事(江、河、陂、湖、眾流、池、沼),五、作業事,六、庫藏事,七、食事,八、飲事,九、乘事,十、衣事,十一、莊嚴具事,十二、舞歌樂事,十三、香鬘塗飾事,十四、資生具事,十五、諸光明事,十六、男女承奉事。安立了這內外事,再對那些事由「現見增上作意力」,以「變異行」尋思觀察無常之性。

(丙)內事十五種所作變異 + 八種變異因緣

內事有十五種所作變異:一、分位所作變異,二、顯色所作變異,三、形色所作變異,四、興衰所作變異,五、支節具不具所作變異,六、劬勞所作變異,七、他所損害所作變異,八、寒熱所作變異,九、威儀所作變異,十、觸對所作變異,十一、雜染所作變異,十二、疾病所作變異,十三、終沒所作變異,十四、青瘀等所作變異,十五、一切不現盡滅所作變異。  又有八種變異因緣:一、積時貯畜,二、他所損害,三、受用虧損,四、時節變異,五、火所焚燒,六、水所漂爛,七、風所鼓燥,八、異緣會遇。  〔逐一釋八因緣〕一、積時貯畜:有色諸法雖安置守護於好處,經久時自然敗壞,色相衰損變異可得。二、他所損害:種種色法若被他種種捶打損害,便種種形色變異。三、受用虧損:各別屬主的種種色物,由受者受用增上力,損減變異。四、時節變異:秋冬時叢林藥草華葉果等萎黃零落,春夏時枝葉華果青翠繁茂。五、火所焚燒:大火縱逸,焚燒村邑、國城、王都,悉為灰燼。六、水所漂爛:大水洪漫,漂蕩村邑、國城、王都,悉皆淪沒。七、風所鼓燥:大風飄扇,濕衣、濕地、稼穡、叢林乾枯。八、異緣會遇:緣樂受觸受樂受時遇苦受觸,緣苦受觸受苦受時遇樂受觸,緣不苦不樂受觸時遇樂受觸或苦受觸;又有貪者會遇瞋緣,貪纏止息而發起瞋纏,有瞋、癡者會遇異分煩惱生緣亦爾;又如眼識正現前,會遇聲、香、味、觸等餘境餘緣,起異分識,其餘一切如理應知。這名為八種變異因緣——一切有色及無色法所有變異都由這八因緣,除此更無若過若增。  〔依現見作意以十五行觀內事〕一、分位變異:見自或他從少年位乃至老位,諸行相續前後差別、互不相似,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。二、顯色變異:見先有妙色、肌膚鮮澤,後見惡色、肌膚枯槁,復後還見妙色,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。三、形色變異:如顯色,這由肥瘦故,當知亦爾。四、興衰變異:見眷屬財位先興盛、後衰損、復興盛,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。五、支節變異:見支節先無缺減、後有缺減(或王、賊、人、非人所作),見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。六、劬勞變異:見身疲勞極(馳走、跳踊、趒躑、騙騎或種種迅疾身業所作),後見遠離疲極,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。七、他所損害變異:見身被刀杖鞭革皮繩矛矟等壞、或蚊虻蛇蝎諸惡毒觸所損害,後見不變異,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。八、寒熱變異:見正寒時身不舒泰、踡跼戰慄,寒凍纏逼、希遇溫陽;正熱時身體舒泰、身奮乾流汗,熱渴纏逼、希遇清涼;復至寒時還如前,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。九、威儀變異:見行住坐臥隨一威儀或損或益,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十、觸對變異:由觸對順樂受觸領樂受時自能了別樂受分位,了別苦受、不苦不樂受分位亦爾;了別諸受前後變異、是新新性非故故性、或增或減、暫時而有、率爾現前尋即變壞,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十一、雜染變異:了知先所生起的有貪/離貪、有瞋/離瞋、有癡/離癡心,及隨一隨煩惱所染污/不染污心,又了知心相續由煩惱隨煩惱於前後位趣入變壞、不變壞性,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。(心由雜染所作變異現可得故)。十二、疾病變異:見自他先無病安樂強盛、後遭重病苦觸猛利身苦受、復後還無病,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十三、終沒變異:見今時存活安住、後時死沒唯有尸骸空無心識,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十四、青瘀等變異:見死已尸骸或至青瘀位、膿爛位,乃至骨鎖之位,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十五、一切不現盡滅變異:見那骨鎖位於餘時亦不現,皆敗壞、離散、磨滅,遍一切種眼不復見,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。如此且由現見增上作意力,以十五種行觀察內事種種變異無常之性。

(丁)外事十六種變異

觀察了內事,再觀察十六外事種種變異無常之性:一、地事:見此地方所先未造立道場、天寺、宅舍、市鄽、城牆等,後見新造善飾,復見朽故圮坼零落頹毀穿缺、火燒水蕩,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。二、園事:見諸園苑藥草叢林華果枝葉先茂盛青翠可愛,後見枯槁無華果、柯葉零落、火燒水蕩,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。三、山事:見其山叢林蓊欝、聳石巉巖,後見彫殘頹毀、高下參差、火燒水蕩,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。四、水事:見諸河瀆池泉井等先濤波涌溢、醴水盈滿,後見枯涸乾竭,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。五、業事:見殉利、牧、農、工巧、正論、行船等業先興盛、後衰損,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。六、庫藏事:見種種庫藏一時盈滿、一時滅盡,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。七、飲食事:見飲食一時未辦、一時已辦、一時入口牙齒咀嚼和雜涎唾細細吞咽、一時入腹漸消化、一時變為屎尿流出,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。八、乘事:見種種乘先新妙莊嚴可愛、後朽故離飾,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。九、衣事:見衣服一時新成、一時故壞、一時鮮潔、一時垢膩,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十、嚴具事:見莊嚴具一時未成、一時已成、一時堅固、一時破壞,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十一、舞歌樂事:見舞歌伎樂現在種種音曲異起異謝,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十二、香鬘塗飾事:見種種香鬘先鮮榮芬馥、後萎悴臭爛,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十三、資具事:見其未造、已造、成滿、破壞前後變異,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十四、光明事:見種種明闇生滅變異,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。十五、男女承奉事:見其或衰或盛、不久堅住,見到這一變異以後,便作這樣的思惟:「這些諸行,其性無常。」為什麼?因為這一事相的前後變異現前可得。〔論本廣釋此十五段,食、飲二事合為「飲食」一段而說。〕  〔總結外事〕這一切外事諸行,前之六種(地·園·山·水·業·庫藏,即「所攝受事」),後之十種(食·飲·乘·衣·莊嚴具·舞歌樂·香鬘塗飾·資生具·諸光明·男女承奉,即「身資具事」)——要言之,當知其性皆是無常(形相轉變現可得故)。由如前所說諸變異行,以現見增上作意力,對內外事如其所應以變異行觀察一切是無常性;由此於諸變異無常之性「現見、不背、不由他緣、非他所引」,隨念觀察、審諦決定——這就名為「現見增上作意」。

(戊)比度——剎那生滅·破自在論

即由現見增上作意力觀察了變異無常後:那些色行雖然現有剎那的生滅、滅壞無常,但因微細故,非現量所得,所以要依現見增上作意「正比度」。  怎麼比度?就是:那些行必定要有剎那的生滅、滅壞,才能有前後變異;不是如是〔不變地〕住而能有變異——所以諸行必定應有剎那生滅。又:由彼彼眾緣和合,如是如是諸行得生;生已不待滅壞的因緣,自然滅壞。所以那「變異因緣」(前八因緣)只是能令諸行轉變生起的「變異生起因緣」,並非諸行的「滅壞因緣」。為什麼?因為諸行與世間現見的滅壞因緣俱滅壞後,後面有「不相似」的生起可得,並非一切全不生起;或有諸行滅壞後一切生起全不可得(如煎水等最後皆消盡,災火焚燒器世間後都無灰燼乃至餘影不可得)——那也是因緣後後展轉漸減至盡,最後一切都無所有,並不是「火」作如是事。所以變異是由前說八因緣令其變異生起、自然滅壞。如此由比度作意力,以「滅壞行」對諸行的剎那生滅、滅壞無常得決定。  對這事得決定後,又對「他世非現見的諸行生起」應正比度。怎麼比度?就是:諸有情現有種種差別可得——或好形色或惡形色,或上族姓或下族姓,或富或貧,或大宗葉或小宗葉,或長壽或短壽,言或威肅或不威肅,或利根或鈍根;這一切有情差別,必定由「作業」有差別方可成立,並非無作業。如此有情色類差別,必定由先世善、不善業造作增長種種品類;由那因緣,於今自體差別生起,不應以「自在〔天〕變化」為因。為什麼?若說自在變化為因能生諸行,這所生行是只用那自在為緣?還是要待其餘緣,自在才能變化?若只用自在為緣,那諸行就與自在俱應本有,何須更生?若說先有自在體性然後行生,那諸行就不是只以自在為緣生起。若說自在隨其所欲、功用、祈願才能造化,那就也用「欲」為因緣,非唯自在。若這樣,這「欲」是有因還是無因?若說有因、即以自在為因,這就同前面所說的過失,不應道理;若說這欲更有其餘因,那就如「欲」一樣,功用、祈願離開自在之外另有餘法為因——如此也應一切諸行都用餘法為因,何須妄計那無用的自在?由如此等比度增上作意力,對「有他世」諸行生起獲得決定。  如此略由三種增上作意力,尋思觀察內外諸行是無常性:一、淨信增上作意力,二、現見增上作意力,三、比度增上作意力。

(己)無常五行·趣入苦行·空行·無我行

在前面所舉「能隨順修無常」的五行中,已辯了變異行、滅壞行。  怎麼再由「別離行」觀無常性?依內、外二種別離,當知諸行無常。依內別離:如有一人先為他主、非奴非使、能自受用、能驅役他作事業,後時退失主性、非奴使性,轉得「他之奴」及「所使」之性——於主性等名為別離無常。依外別離:現前有資生財寶,先未變異、未為別離滅壞,後時被王、盜賊、非愛及共財者所劫奪,或由惡作加行而失壞,或方便求而不得。這類名為由別離行知無常性。  怎麼再由「法性行」觀無常性?就是:所有變異無常、滅壞無常、別離無常,於現在世還未合會,於未來世「當有」這法性;如實通達這些行於未來世當有的法性——這類名為通達「法性無常」。  怎麼再由「合會行」觀無常性?就是:這變異、滅壞、別離無常,於現在世合會現前;如實通達這些行於現在世現前合會——這類名為通達「合會無常」。他對這內外諸行的「五無常性」,由五種行如其所應作意修習、多修習,獲得決定。  如此由「證成道理」及「修增上」,對無常行得決定後,從此無間趣入「苦行」:作這樣思惟——這些行皆是無常;既無常故,決定應是「有生」法性;既是生法,即有生苦;既有生苦,當知亦有老病死苦、怨憎會苦、愛別離苦、求不得苦。如此且由「不可愛行」趣入苦行。  如此又對「有漏、有取、能順樂受」的一切蘊中,由「結縛行」趣入苦行。為什麼?因為於愛等結處生愛等結、於貪等縛處生貪等縛,便能招集生老病死愁悲憂苦一切擾惱的純大苦蘊。  如此又對「有漏、有取、順非苦樂」的一切蘊中,由「不安隱行」趣入苦行。為什麼?有漏有取順非苦樂的一切諸蘊,被麁重俱行的苦、樂種子所隨逐,是苦苦、壞苦、不解脫的,所以一切皆是無常滅法。如此行者:於能隨順樂受的諸行及樂受中,由結縛行趣入「壞苦」;於能隨順苦受的諸行及苦受中,由不可愛行趣入「苦苦」;於能隨順不苦不樂受的諸行及不苦不樂受中,由不安隱行趣入「行苦」。  如此由結縛行、不可愛行、不安隱行的增上力,於三受中作這樣說:「諸所有受皆悉是苦。」這名為由無常行作意為先、趣入苦行。  〔空行〕又作這念:我如今唯有諸根、唯有境界、唯有從彼所生的諸受、唯有其心、唯有假名的「我、我所」法、唯有其見、唯有假立——這中可得,除此更無若過若增。如此唯有諸蘊可得,於諸蘊中無有「常恒、堅住、主宰」的,或說為我、或說有情,或於此說為生者、老者、病者、死者,或說彼能造諸業、能受種種果及異熟——由是諸行皆悉是空,無有我故。這名為由「無所得行」趣入空行。  〔無我行〕又作這念:所有諸行與其自相、及無常相、苦相相應;那也一切從緣生故,不得自在;不自在故,皆非是我。這名為由「不自在行」入無我行。

(庚)十行攝四行

如此行者,以這十行攝為四行,再以四行了知苦諦相:無常行為五行所攝(變異行、滅壞行、別離行、法性行、合會行);苦行為三行所攝(結縛行、不可愛行、不安隱行);空行為一行所攝(無所得行);無我行為一行所攝(不自在行)。他由十行悟入四行。

四、集諦四行

由四行於苦諦相正覺了後,再觀察這苦諦「何因?何集?何起?何緣?」——由斷彼故苦亦隨斷;如此即以集諦四行了知集諦相:了知「愛」能引苦故說名為「因」;既引苦已又能招集令其生故說名為「集」;既生苦已令彼起故說名為「起」;又於當來諸苦種子能攝受故、次第招引諸苦集故說名為「緣」。  復有差別:了知「愛」是「取」之因故〔說名因〕,又能招集——即以其取為因有故〔說名集〕,又能生起——以有為上首、招當來生故〔說名起〕,又能引發——以生為緣的老病死等諸苦法故〔說名緣〕;隨其所應,當知說名因、集、起、緣。  ★復有差別:正了知「煩惱隨眠附屬所依,愛隨眠等是當來世後有生因」〔說名因〕;又正了知「彼所生的纏」隨其所應是集、起、緣——即:「後有愛」能招引故即是「集」;此後有愛又能發起「喜貪俱行愛」;此喜貪俱行愛又與多種彼彼喜愛為緣。如此依止愛隨眠等及三種纏能生後有、能發起諸愛差別,所以說名因、集、起、緣。如此行者,由四種行了知集諦相。

五、滅諦四行·道諦四行

於集諦相正覺了後,再正覺了:這集諦「無餘息滅」故名為「滅」;一切苦諦「無餘寂靜」故名為「靜」;即這滅、靜,是第一故、是最勝故、是無上故,說名為「妙」;是常住故、永出離故,說名為「離」。如此行者,由四種行了知滅諦相。  於滅諦相正覺了後,再正覺了「真對治道」:於所知境能通尋求義故〔名道〕、能實尋求義故〔名如〕、由於四門隨轉義故〔名行〕、一向能趣涅槃義故〔名出〕,所以說名道、如、行、出。如此行者,由四種行了知道諦相。  如此名為「於四聖諦自內現觀」的了相作意。

六、法智、類智種子依處

他既如此於自內現見諸蘊、依諸諦理無倒尋思正觀察後,再對其餘「不同分界、不現見」的蘊比度觀察:就是那些有為、有漏的〔蘊〕遍一切處、遍一切種、於一切時皆有如是法、皆墮如是理、皆有如是性;彼所有滅皆永寂靜、常住安樂;彼所有道皆能永斷、究竟出離。當知這裡:若對現見諸蘊的「諦智」,若對其餘不同分界不現見境的「比度諦智」,即是「能生法智、類智種子」的依處。  又這了相作意,當知還是「聞、思」間雜的。

七、勝解作意——無邊際智·伏我慢·以心緣心

若觀行者於諸諦中如此數數正觀察,由十六行對四聖諦的「證成道理」已得決定,再對諸諦的「盡所有性、如所有性」超過聞思間雜作意,一向發起修行的勝解——這就名為勝解作意。  這作意唯緣諦境、一向在定。於此修習、多修習,於苦、集二諦境中得「無邊際智」。由此智了知無常,發起「無常無邊際勝解」;如此了知苦等,發起苦、空無我、惡行、往惡趣、興衰,及老病死愁悲憂苦一切擾惱的「無邊際勝解」。這「無邊際」就是生死流轉:這些法無邊無際,乃至生死流轉不絕,常有如是諸法;唯有生死無餘息滅,這可息滅,更無其餘息滅方便。即於這樣的諸有、諸趣死生法中,以「無願行、無所依行、深厭逆行」發起勝解,精勤修習勝解作意。又對這諸有、諸生的增上意樂深心厭怖,及對涅槃隨起一行深心願樂。  他長夜以來其心愛樂世間色聲香味觸等、為色聲香味觸等所滋長積集;由此因緣,雖對涅槃深心願樂,卻對它不能趣入、不能證淨、不能安住、不能勝解,其心退轉;對寂靜界未能深心生希仰、又有疑慮故,其心數數厭離、驚怖。雖對一切苦、集二諦數數深心厭離驚怖、及對涅槃數數發起深心願樂,然而還不能深心趣入。為什麼?因為他還有「能障現觀的麁品我慢」隨入作意,間、無間地運轉,作這樣思惟:「我於生死曾久流轉、我於生死當復流轉;我於涅槃當能趣入、我為涅槃修諸善法;我能觀苦真實是苦、我能觀集真實是集、我能觀滅真實是滅、我能觀道真實是道;我能觀空真實是空、我觀無願真是無願、我觀無相真是無相;如是諸法是我所有。」由此因緣,雖對涅槃深心願樂,然心於彼不能趣入。  他既了知這我慢是障礙,便能速疾以慧通達,棄捨「任運隨轉」的作意,制伏一切外所知境,趣入作意;隨作意而行,專精無間觀察聖諦;隨所生起的心謝滅時,無間生起後心作意觀察,方便流注、無有間斷。他既如此「以心緣心、專精無替」,便能令那「隨入作意、障礙現觀的麁品我慢」無容得生。

八、悟入四諦·煗·頂·忍·世第一法

如此勤修瑜伽行者:觀心相續展轉別異、新新而生、或增或減、暫時而有、率爾現前、前後變易,是無常性;觀心相續入「取蘊」所攝,是為苦性;觀心相續「離第二法」(無第二我法),是為空性;觀心相續從眾緣生、不得自在,是無我性——這名為悟入苦諦。次觀此心相續以愛為因、為集、為起、為緣——名為悟入集諦。次觀此心相續所有的擇滅,是永滅性、永靜性、永妙性、永離性——名為悟入滅諦。次觀此心相續究竟對治、趣滅之道,是真道性、真如性、真行性、真出性——名為悟入道諦。  如此先來未善觀察、今善作意方便觀察,以微妙慧於四聖諦能正悟入;即於此慧親近、修習、多修習,能「緣、所緣平等平等」的正智得生。由此生故,能斷「障礙愛樂涅槃」的所有麁品現行我慢;又對涅槃深心願樂、速能趣入,心無退轉、離諸怖畏、攝受增上意樂適悅。  如此行者,於諸聖諦:  ——「下忍」所攝的「能緣所緣平等平等智」生起,名為煗。  ——「中忍」所攝的能緣所緣平等平等智生起,名為頂。  諦順忍——「上忍」所攝的能緣所緣平等平等智生起,名諦順忍。  他既如此斷了能障礙的麁品我慢、及對涅槃攝受增上意樂適悅,便能捨離「後後觀心」的所有加行,住於「無加行、無分別」的心。他這時其心「似滅而非實滅、似無所緣而非無緣」;又這時其心寂靜,「雖似遠離而非〔真〕遠離」;又這時不被美睡眠所覆蓋,唯有分明、無高無下的奢摩他行。〔簡別〕另有一類闇昧愚癡的人,被美睡眠覆蓋,於「其心似滅非實滅」中起增上慢、自謂為現觀——這個不是〔真現觀〕。他既得這樣的「趣現觀心」,不久當入正性離生。  世第一法——即於這樣的寂靜心位,最後一念的無分別心,從此無間於前所觀的諸聖諦理起內作意,這就名為世第一法。從此以後出世心生、非世間心;這是世間諸行的最後界畔、邊際,所以名為世第一法。

The mundane path has been set forth; from here the fascicle turns into the "supramundane path": in dependence on the field that is the four noble truths, it gradually gives rise to the seven attentions. First comes the attention that apprehends the aspect — awakening to the aspect of the truths by way of the four modes of each of the four truths (the sixteen modes); with respect to the truth of suffering it further opens out ten modes of contemplation, and by the three sources of knowledge (authoritative teaching, direct seeing, and inference) it establishes impermanence, refutes the non-Buddhist doctrine of a Sovereign Lord, and gathers the ten modes back into four; then it gives the four modes each of the truths of origination, cessation, and the path. Next comes the attention of resolute conviction (the knowledge of the boundless, the subduing of the conceit "I am," the taking of mind as the object of mind), and finally the four wholesome roots of the preparatory effort: warmth, summit, acceptance, and the supreme worldly dharma. The terms are kept as of old, rendered clause by clause into today's language, adding no doctrinal exposition, citing no treatise, glossing no Sanskrit; where the treatise-text is compressed, it is filled back in with 〔brackets〕; the treatise's own repeating frame of "seeing this matter, one then reflects that all conditioned things are impermanent · the rest as before" is retained item by item.

1 · The Supramundane Path — In Dependence on the Field That Is the Four Noble Truths, Arousing the Seven Attentions

This is the second part of the Fourth Yoga-Station in the thirteenth division, the Śrāvaka Stage, within the Basic Section.

The mundane path has now been set forth in full. If one delights in proceeding toward the supramundane path, one should take as one's basis the field that is the "four noble truths," and gradually arouse seven kinds of attention — namely, from the first, the attention that apprehends the aspect, down to the last, the attention that is the fruit of the culmination of preparatory effort, and so on up to the realization of the fruit of arhatship.

2 · The Attention That Apprehends the Aspect — Four Modes for Each of the Four Truths

The yoga practitioner, with respect to the brief statement and the extensive discussion — the superior teaching — of the four noble truths, hears and upholds it; or has already well cultivated the attention; or has already attained the fundamental meditative absorption or the formless attainments.  By four modes he comes to know the aspect of the "truth of suffering": the mode of impermanence, the mode of suffering, the mode of emptiness, the mode of no-self.  By four modes he comes to know the aspect of the "truth of origination": the mode of cause, the mode of origination, the mode of arising, the mode of condition.  By four modes he comes to know the aspect of the "truth of cessation": the mode of cessation, the mode of stilling, the mode of the sublime, the mode of departure.  By four modes he comes to know the aspect of the "truth of the path": the mode of the path, the mode of the fitting, the mode of the coursing, the mode of the going-forth. This is what is named the attention that apprehends the aspect.

3 · The Truth of Suffering — Contemplating by Ten Modes, Entering by Four Modes

By ten kinds of mode he contemplates the truth of suffering, and can thereby enter into the four modes of the truth of suffering. Which ten modes? First, the mode of alteration; second, the mode of decay-and-ruin; third, the mode of separation; fourth, the mode of dharma-nature; fifth, the mode of coming-together; sixth, the mode of bondage-and-fetter; seventh, the mode of the unlovely; eighth, the mode of the insecure; ninth, the mode of the ungettable; tenth, the mode of the not-self-determining. These ten modes, by "the principle that establishes and proves," can be rightly contemplated.

(a) The Source of Authoritative Teaching — All Conditioned Things Are Impermanent

Here he relies first upon the principle of "the source of authoritative teaching." As the World-Honored One said, "all conditioned things are impermanent." Again, these conditioned things are, in brief, of two kinds: first, the world of sentient beings; second, the world as receptacle. Relying upon the world of sentient beings, the World-Honored One said: "Bhikṣus, you should know! With the purified divine eye that surpasses the human, I contemplate sentient beings at the time of their dying and at the time of their birth, down to their being reborn, after the body has broken up, into the world of the gods in a good destiny" — by this teaching-approach it is shown that the World-Honored One, with the purified divine eye, directly sees that the entire world of sentient beings is of the nature of impermanence. Again the World-Honored One said: "Bhikṣus, you should know! This world as receptacle abides for a long time, and after this, gradually, down to when the seven suns appear (as is extensively set forth in the Sūtra of the Seven Suns), down to all the great earth, the mountains, the great oceans, and Sumeru the King of great jeweled mountains, down to the receptacle-worlds up to the Brahmā-world, are all burned up; and after the disaster-fire has died out, the ash and cinders do not appear, down to where not even a remaining shadow can be got" — by this teaching-approach the World-Honored One shows that all receptacle-worlds are of the nature of impermanence. Thus, relying upon the principle of the source of authoritative teaching, the practitioner of contemplation, by "the power of the attention strengthened by pure faith," gains a settled determination regarding the impermanent nature of all conditioned things.

(b) The Strengthening of Direct Seeing — Establishing Inner and Outer Matters

Having gained the determination, then by this power of the attention strengthened by pure faith he repeatedly ponders and contemplates the impermanent nature of everything that is "directly seen, not contrary [to seeing], not [known] through another's condition." How does he repeatedly ponder and contemplate? He first establishes the two "matters," inner and outer. The "inner matters" are the six sense-bases and the like; the "outer matters" are of sixteen kinds: first, the matter of ground (city, town, house, marketplace, and so on); second, the matter of parks (medicinal herbs, groves, and so on); third, the matter of mountains (the various arrangements and differences of mountains); fourth, the matter of water (rivers, streams, embankments, lakes, the many currents, ponds, marshes); fifth, the matter of work; sixth, the matter of storehouses; seventh, the matter of food; eighth, the matter of drink; ninth, the matter of conveyances; tenth, the matter of clothing; eleventh, the matter of ornaments; twelfth, the matter of dance, song, and music; thirteenth, the matter of perfume, garlands, and unguents; fourteenth, the matter of the requisites of livelihood; fifteenth, the matter of the various lights; sixteenth, the matter of the attendance of men and women. Having established these inner and outer matters, he then, with respect to those matters, by "the power of the attention strengthened by direct seeing," ponders and contemplates their impermanent nature by the "mode of alteration."

(c) The Fifteen Kinds of Wrought Alteration in Inner Matters + the Eight Causes and Conditions of Alteration

Inner matters have fifteen kinds of wrought alteration: first, alteration wrought by phase; second, alteration wrought by color; third, alteration wrought by shape; fourth, alteration wrought by flourishing-and-declining; fifth, alteration wrought by the completeness or incompleteness of the limbs and joints; sixth, alteration wrought by toil; seventh, alteration wrought by injury from another; eighth, alteration wrought by cold and heat; ninth, alteration wrought by bodily posture; tenth, alteration wrought by contact-and-encounter; eleventh, alteration wrought by defilement; twelfth, alteration wrought by disease; thirteenth, alteration wrought by dying-and-passing; fourteenth, alteration wrought by the bruised-and-purple [corpse] and the rest; fifteenth, alteration wrought by the total non-appearance and utter extinction of everything.  And there are eight kinds of causes and conditions of alteration: first, the accumulation and storing-up over time; second, injury from another; third, loss through use; fourth, the alteration of the seasons; fifth, being burned by fire; sixth, being washed away and rotted by water; seventh, being fanned dry by wind; eighth, the meeting with a differing condition.  〔The eight causes and conditions explained one by one〕 First, accumulation and storing-up over time: material dharmas, though set down and guarded in a good place, of themselves decay after long time has passed, and a decline and alteration of their material appearance can be got. Second, injury from another: if the various material dharmas are struck and injured by another in various ways, then in various ways their shape alters. Third, loss through use: the various material things belonging severally to owners, by the power of the user's using them, decline and alter. Fourth, the alteration of the seasons: in autumn and winter the groves, medicinal herbs, flowers, leaves, and fruits wither yellow and fall; in spring and summer the branches, leaves, flowers, and fruits are green and luxuriant. Fifth, being burned by fire: a great fire, running wild, burns up villages, towns, kingdom-capitals, and royal cities, and all become ash and cinders. Sixth, being washed away and rotted by water: a great flood, overflowing, sweeps away villages, towns, kingdom-capitals, and royal cities, and all are drowned. Seventh, being fanned dry by wind: a great wind, blowing and fanning, dries up wet clothes, wet ground, crops, and groves. Eighth, the meeting with a differing condition: on the occasion of a pleasant-feeling contact when one is experiencing pleasant feeling, one meets a painful-feeling contact; on the occasion of a painful-feeling contact when one is experiencing painful feeling, one meets a pleasant-feeling contact; on the occasion of a neither-painful-nor-pleasant-feeling contact one meets a pleasant-feeling contact or a painful-feeling contact; again, one who has craving meets a condition for anger, the entangling craving is stilled and an entangling anger is aroused, and it is likewise for one who has anger or delusion meeting a condition for the arising of an affliction of another kind; again, just as when eye-consciousness is present before one, on meeting a further object and further condition of sound, smell, taste, touch, and the like, a consciousness of another kind arises — all the rest is to be understood in accordance with principle. This is named the eight kinds of causes and conditions of alteration — all the alteration belonging to every material and non-material dharma is by these eight causes and conditions; apart from these there is nothing further, whether beyond or in addition.  〔By the attention of direct seeing, contemplating inner matters by fifteen modes〕 First, alteration of phase: seeing that oneself or another, from the phase of youth down to the phase of old age, passes through a succession of conditioned states differing before and after and not resembling one another, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Second, alteration of color: seeing that there was formerly a fine color, the skin fresh and lustrous, and afterward seeing an ill color, the skin withered and dried, and later again seeing a fine color, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Third, alteration of shape: as with color, this too — by way of fatness and leanness — should be understood likewise. Fourth, alteration of flourishing-and-declining: seeing that one's kin and wealth-position first flourish, then decline, then flourish again, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Fifth, alteration of the limbs: seeing the limbs and joints first without lack or diminishment, then with lack or diminishment (whether wrought by a king, a robber, a human, or a non-human), seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Sixth, alteration of toil: seeing the body utterly wearied with toil (by galloping, leaping, hopping, riding, or the various swift bodily actions), and afterward seeing it freed from utter weariness, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Seventh, alteration of injury from another: seeing the body ruined by knife, staff, whip, hide-thong, spear, lance, and the like, or injured by the malignant venomous contact of mosquitoes, gadflies, snakes, and scorpions, and afterward seeing it not altered, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Eighth, alteration of cold and heat: seeing that in the very cold the body is not at ease, huddles and shivers, and is beset and oppressed by freezing cold, longing to meet warmth and sun; in the very heat the body is at ease, is parched and streams with sweat, and is beset and oppressed by heat and thirst, longing to meet coolness; and coming again to a cold time it is as before, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Ninth, alteration of posture: seeing that in walking, standing, sitting, and lying, in any one posture, [the body] is either impaired or benefited, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Tenth, alteration of contact-and-encounter: by a contact-and-encounter conforming to pleasant-feeling contact, when experiencing pleasant feeling, one can of oneself discern the phase of pleasant feeling; it is likewise for discerning the phase of painful feeling and of neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling; discerning that these feelings, before and after, are altering — that they are of a ceaselessly-new nature, not an old-and-enduring nature; that they either increase or decrease; that they are but momentary, coming spontaneously to the fore and then straightway altering and breaking up — seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Eleventh, alteration of defilement: knowing the mind that previously arose as having-craving / free-of-craving, having-anger / free-of-anger, having-delusion / free-of-delusion, and the mind defiled or not defiled by any of the secondary afflictions; and knowing further that the mind-continuum, by the afflictions and secondary afflictions, in its earlier and later states enters into an altering or a non-altering nature — seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Twelfth, alteration of disease: seeing that oneself or another, first without disease, at ease, strong and vigorous, afterward meets grave disease with a fierce contact of painful feeling and sharp bodily pain, and later again is without disease, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Thirteenth, alteration of dying-and-passing: seeing that one now living, at ease and abiding, at a later time dies and passes, having only a corpse, empty and without mind-consciousness, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Fourteenth, alteration of the bruised-and-purple and the rest: seeing that after death the corpse comes to the phase of being bruised-and-purple, the phase of festering-and-rotting, down to the phase of the chained bones, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Fifteenth, alteration of the total non-appearance and utter extinction: seeing that the phase of the chained bones at yet another time also does not appear, all decaying, scattering, and worn to extinction, in every way no longer seen by the eye, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Thus, by the power of the attention strengthened by direct seeing, he contemplates by fifteen kinds of mode the impermanent nature of the various alterations in inner matters.

(d) The Sixteen Kinds of Alteration in Outer Matters

Having contemplated the inner matters, he next contemplates the impermanent nature of the various alterations in the sixteen outer matters: first, the matter of ground: seeing that this locality formerly had no practice-place, heavenly temple, dwelling-house, marketplace, city-wall, and the like built and set up, and afterward seeing them newly built and well adorned, and again seeing them worn and old, collapsed and cracked, fallen and ruined, breached and gapped, burned by fire and washed by water, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Second, the matter of parks: seeing that the parks and gardens, medicinal herbs, groves, flowers, fruits, branches, and leaves were formerly luxuriant, green and lovable, and afterward seeing them withered, without flower or fruit, their boughs and leaves fallen, burned by fire and washed by water, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Third, the matter of mountains: seeing that its groves are dense and lush, its towering rocks steep and craggy, and afterward seeing them worn away and ruined, high and low uneven, burned by fire and washed by water, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Fourth, the matter of water: seeing that the rivers, canals, ponds, and springs first surge with billows and overflow, brimming with sweet water, and afterward seeing them dried up and run dry, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Fifth, the matter of work: seeing that the trades of pursuing profit, herding, farming, craftsmanship, right disputation, sailing, and the like first flourish and afterward decline, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Sixth, the matter of storehouses: seeing that the various storehouses are at one time brimful and at one time exhausted, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Seventh, the matter of food-and-drink: seeing that food-and-drink at one time is not yet prepared, at one time is prepared, at one time enters the mouth and, chewed by the teeth and mixed with saliva, is swallowed bit by bit, at one time enters the belly and is gradually digested, and at one time is transformed into feces and urine and flows out, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Eighth, the matter of conveyances: seeing that the various conveyances are first newly fine, adorned and lovable, and afterward worn out and stripped of adornment, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Ninth, the matter of clothing: seeing that clothing at one time is newly made, at one time worn out, at one time fresh and clean, at one time soiled and greasy, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Tenth, the matter of ornaments: seeing that ornaments at one time are not yet made, at one time already made, at one time firm and solid, at one time broken, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Eleventh, the matter of dance, song, and music: seeing that dance, song, and instrumental music, now the various tunes and airs, arise differently and pass away differently, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Twelfth, the matter of perfume, garlands, and unguents: seeing that the various perfumes and garlands are first fresh, glossy, and fragrant, and afterward wilted, faded, foul, and rotten, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Thirteenth, the matter of requisites: seeing the alteration, before and after, of their being not yet made, already made, complete, or broken, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Fourteenth, the matter of lights: seeing the arising-and-ceasing alteration of the various brightnesses and darknesses, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. Fifteenth, the matter of the attendance of men and women: seeing that they either decline or flourish, not abiding firm for long, seeing this alteration, he reflects: "These conditioned things are impermanent in nature." Why? Because the before-and-after alteration of this matter is directly observable. 〔The treatise-text extensively explains these fifteen segments, speaking of the two matters of food and drink combined as the one segment "food-and-drink."〕  〔A summary of the outer matters〕 All these outer matters, the conditioned things — the former six kinds (ground · park · mountain · water · work · storehouse, that is, "the matters received-and-retained"), and the latter ten kinds (food · drink · conveyance · clothing · ornaments · dance-song-music · perfume-garlands-unguents · the requisites of livelihood · the various lights · the attendance of men and women, that is, "the matters that are requisites of the body") — in short, it should be known that their nature is all impermanent (because the shifting and turning of their form and appearance can presently be got). By the aforesaid modes of alteration, by the power of the attention strengthened by direct seeing, he contemplates with respect to the inner and outer matters, as is fitting, by the mode of alteration, that all is of the nature of impermanence; and thereby, regarding the impermanent nature that is the alterations, which is "directly seen, not contrary [to seeing], not [known] through another's condition, not drawn forth by another," he in recollection contemplates and, with close scrutiny, comes to a settled determination — and this is what is named "the attention strengthened by direct seeing."

(e) Inference — Momentary Arising-and-Ceasing · Refuting the Doctrine of a Sovereign Lord

Now, by the power of the attention strengthened by direct seeing, having contemplated the impermanence that is alteration: those material conditioned things do indeed presently have a momentary arising-and-ceasing, a decaying impermanence, but because it is subtle, it is not got by direct perception; therefore one must, in dependence on the attention strengthened by direct seeing, "rightly infer."  How does he infer? Thus: those conditioned things must have a momentary arising-and-ceasing, a decay, before they can have alteration before and after; it is not that they can have alteration while abiding thus 〔unchanging〕 — therefore the conditioned things must have a momentary arising-and-ceasing. Again: by this and that concurrence of conditions, thus and thus do the conditioned things get to arise; having arisen, without waiting for a cause-and-condition of decay, they decay of themselves. Therefore that "cause-and-condition of alteration" (the former eight causes and conditions) is merely the "cause-and-condition of the arising of alteration" that can make the conditioned things shift and turn and arise, and is not the "cause-and-condition of the decay" of the conditioned things. Why? Because after the conditioned things, together with the world's directly-seen cause-and-condition of decay, have decayed, a "dissimilar" arising can afterward be got, and it is not that everything altogether does not arise; or there are conditioned things after whose decay every arising is altogether ungettable (as when boiled water and the like at last are all used up, or after the disaster-fire has burned the receptacle-world there is no ash or cinder, down to where not even a remaining shadow can be got) — that too is because the causes-and-conditions, one after another turning and gradually diminishing to the point of exhaustion, at last become altogether nonexistent; it is not that the "fire" does such a thing. Therefore the alteration is, by the aforesaid eight causes and conditions, made to arise as alteration and then decays of itself. Thus, by the power of the attention of inference, by the "mode of decay," he gains a settled determination regarding the momentary arising-and-ceasing, the decaying impermanence, of the conditioned things.  Having gained the determination regarding this matter, he should then rightly infer regarding "the arising of the conditioned things of other lives, which is not directly seen." How does he infer? Thus: sentient beings can presently be got as having various differences — some of fine color, some of ill color, some of high clan and lineage, some of low clan and lineage, some rich, some poor, some of great kindred, some of small kindred, some long-lived, some short-lived, some dignified and grave in speech, some not; some of sharp faculties, some of dull faculties; all these differences of sentient beings can only be established by there being a difference of "action-deeds," and not by there being no action-deeds. Thus the differences in the color-classes of sentient beings must be by former-life wholesome and unwholesome actions performing and increasing the various kinds; by that cause-and-condition the difference of their present self-body arises, and one should not take "the transformation of a Sovereign Lord" as its cause. Why? If one says that the transformation of a Sovereign Lord, as cause, can produce the conditioned things — do these produced conditioned things use only that Sovereign Lord as their condition? Or must they await further conditions before the Sovereign Lord can transform them? If they use only the Sovereign Lord as their condition, then the conditioned things, together with the Sovereign Lord, should originally exist — why need they arise anew? If one says the Sovereign Lord's self-nature first exists and then the conditioned things arise, then the conditioned things are not aroused with only the Sovereign Lord as their condition. If one says the Sovereign Lord, following upon his own wish, effort, and prayer, can then create — then this too uses "wish" as a cause-and-condition, and not the Sovereign Lord alone. If so, this "wish" — is it with cause or without cause? If one says it is with cause, and takes the Sovereign Lord as its cause, this is the same fault as stated before, and does not accord with principle; if one says this wish further has some other cause, then, just as with "wish," so effort and prayer, apart from the Sovereign Lord, have another dharma as their cause — and thus all conditioned things should likewise use another dharma as their cause; why falsely posit that useless Sovereign Lord? By the power of the attention strengthened by inference of this and the like kind, he gains a settled determination regarding the arising of the conditioned things of "there being other lives."  Thus, in brief, by the power of the three kinds of strengthened attention he ponders and contemplates the impermanent nature of the inner and outer conditioned things: first, the power of the attention strengthened by pure faith; second, the power of the attention strengthened by direct seeing; third, the power of the attention strengthened by inference.

(f) The Five Modes of Impermanence · Entering into the Mode of Suffering · the Mode of Emptiness · the Mode of No-Self

Among the five modes "conducive to the cultivation of impermanence" set out before, the mode of alteration and the mode of decay have already been discussed.  How again does he contemplate the nature of impermanence by the "mode of separation"? In dependence on the two kinds of separation, inner and outer, it should be known that conditioned things are impermanent. In dependence on inner separation: as when a certain man was formerly a master over others, neither slave nor servant, able to use [things] of himself and able to drive others to do work, and at a later time loses his master-nature and his not-being-slave-or-servant nature, and turns to acquire the nature of "another's slave" and of "one who is driven" — with respect to the master-nature and the like, this is named separation-impermanence. In dependence on outer separation: the requisites of livelihood, wealth, and treasure present before one, which had not yet altered, had not yet been separated and decayed, at a later time are plundered by a king, a robber, one unloved, or a co-owner of the property, or are lost through an evil-doing endeavor, or are sought by some means and not got. This kind is named coming to know impermanence by the mode of separation.  How again does he contemplate the nature of impermanence by the "mode of dharma-nature"? Thus: all the impermanence of alteration, the impermanence of decay, and the impermanence of separation, which in the present world have not yet come together, "will be" this dharma-nature in the future world; to penetrate as it really is that these conditioned things will have this dharma-nature in the future world — this kind is named penetrating "the impermanence of dharma-nature."  How again does he contemplate the nature of impermanence by the "mode of coming-together"? Thus: this impermanence of alteration, of decay, and of separation comes together and appears in the present world; to penetrate as it really is that these conditioned things come together and appear in the present world — this kind is named penetrating "the impermanence of coming-together." As to the "five natures of impermanence" of these inner and outer conditioned things, by five modes, as is fitting, he cultivates the attention and cultivates it much, and gains a settled determination.  Thus, by "the principle that establishes and proves" and by "the strengthening of cultivation," having gained the determination regarding the mode of impermanence, from this without interval he enters into the "mode of suffering," reflecting thus: these conditioned things are all impermanent; being impermanent, they must decidedly be of the dharma-nature of "having birth"; being of the nature that is born, there is the suffering of birth; there being the suffering of birth, it should be known that there is also the suffering of aging, sickness, and death, the suffering of meeting the hated, the suffering of parting from the loved, and the suffering of not getting what is sought. Thus, by the "mode of the unlovely," he enters into the mode of suffering.  Thus again, with respect to all the aggregates that are "with-outflow, with-appropriation, and conducive to pleasant feeling," by the "mode of bondage-and-fetter" he enters into the mode of suffering. Why? Because at the place of the fetter of craving and the like, the fetter of craving and the like arises, and at the place of the bond of greed and the like, the bond of greed and the like arises, and thus one is able to gather and amass the whole great heap of suffering — birth, aging, sickness, death, grief, lamentation, sorrow, pain, and every disturbance.  Thus again, with respect to all the aggregates that are "with-outflow, with-appropriation, and conducive to the neither-painful-nor-pleasant," by the "mode of the insecure" he enters into the mode of suffering. Why? All the aggregates that are with-outflow, with-appropriation, and conducive to the neither-painful-nor-pleasant are pursued by the seeds of suffering and pleasure that operate together with the coarse-and-heavy, and are the suffering of suffering, the suffering of decay, and unliberated; therefore all is a dharma of impermanent cessation. Thus the practitioner: with respect to the conditioned things conducive to pleasant feeling and to pleasant feeling itself, by the mode of bondage-and-fetter he enters into the "suffering of decay"; with respect to the conditioned things conducive to painful feeling and to painful feeling itself, by the mode of the unlovely he enters into the "suffering of suffering"; with respect to the conditioned things conducive to neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling and to neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling itself, by the mode of the insecure he enters into the "suffering of conditioning."  Thus, by the strengthening power of the mode of bondage-and-fetter, the mode of the unlovely, and the mode of the insecure, he speaks thus with respect to the three feelings: "all feelings whatsoever are suffering." This is named entering into the mode of suffering, having the mode of impermanence as attention going before.  〔The mode of emptiness〕 He reflects again thus: I have now only the faculties, only the objective fields, only the feelings that arise from them, only their mind, only the dharmas that are the "I and mine" of mere designation, only their view, only mere positing — this much can be got, and apart from this there is nothing further, whether beyond or in addition. Thus there are only the aggregates that can be got, and within the aggregates there is nothing "constant, enduring, abiding, and sovereign," whether called a self or called a sentient being, or here called the one who is born, the one who ages, the one who is sick, the one who dies, or called the one who can perform the various deeds and can receive the various fruits and maturations — hence all the conditioned things are empty, because they are without a self. This is named entering into the mode of emptiness by the "mode of the ungettable."  〔The mode of no-self〕 He reflects again thus: all the conditioned things are conjoined with their own particular mark, and with the mark of impermanence and the mark of suffering; and, being all born from conditions, they gain no self-determination; not being self-determining, they are none of them a self. This is named entering into the mode of no-self by the "mode of the not-self-determining."

(g) The Ten Modes Gathered into the Four Modes

Thus the practitioner, gathering these ten modes into four modes, comes by the four modes to know the aspect of the truth of suffering: the mode of impermanence is what is gathered by five modes (the mode of alteration, the mode of decay, the mode of separation, the mode of dharma-nature, the mode of coming-together); the mode of suffering is what is gathered by three modes (the mode of bondage-and-fetter, the mode of the unlovely, the mode of the insecure); the mode of emptiness is what is gathered by one mode (the mode of the ungettable); the mode of no-self is what is gathered by one mode (the mode of the not-self-determining). By the ten modes he enters into the four modes.

4 · The Four Modes of the Truth of Origination

Having by the four modes rightly awakened to the aspect of the truth of suffering, he then contemplates of this truth of suffering: "By what cause? By what origination? By what arising? By what condition?" — by cutting off that, suffering too is cut off along with it; thus, by the four modes of the truth of origination he comes to know the aspect of the truth of origination: knowing that "craving" can draw forth suffering, it is therefore named "cause"; having drawn forth suffering, it can also gather and amass so as to make it arise, and is therefore named "origination"; having already produced suffering, it makes it arise, and is therefore named "arising"; and because it can receive-and-retain the seeds of the future sufferings, and in due order draws forth and gathers the sufferings, it is therefore named "condition."  There is a further distinction: knowing that "craving" is the cause of "grasping" 〔hence named cause〕; and can gather-and-amass — being the cause of that grasping's being present 〔hence named origination〕; and can give arising — with existence at the head, gathering the future birth 〔hence named arising〕; and can draw forth — being the condition of the sufferings of aging, sickness, death, and the like that have birth as their condition 〔hence named condition〕; as is fitting, they should be known as named cause, origination, arising, and condition.  ★ There is a further distinction: rightly knowing that "the latent proclivity of affliction is attached to a support, and the latent proclivity of craving and the like is the cause of the arising of the after-existence of the future world" 〔hence named cause〕; and rightly knowing that "the enwrapment produced from it," as is fitting, is origination, arising, and condition — namely: the "craving for after-existence" can gather-and-draw-forth, and so is "origination"; and this craving for after-existence further arouses "the craving operating together with delight-and-greed"; and this craving operating together with delight-and-greed is further the condition for the many various delights-and-cravings. Thus, in dependence on the latent proclivity of craving and the like and the three kinds of enwrapment, being able to produce after-existence and to arouse the distinctions of the various cravings, they are therefore named cause, origination, arising, and condition. Thus the practitioner, by the four kinds of mode, comes to know the aspect of the truth of origination.

5 · The Four Modes of the Truth of Cessation · the Four Modes of the Truth of the Path

Having rightly awakened to the aspect of the truth of origination, he then rightly awakens: because this truth of origination has "ceased and been stilled without remainder," it is named "cessation"; because all the truth of suffering is "quiescent without remainder," it is named "stilling"; because this very cessation-and-stilling is the foremost, is the most excellent, is the unsurpassed, it is named "the sublime"; because it is constant and abiding and is a permanent going-forth-and-departure, it is named "departure." Thus the practitioner, by the four kinds of mode, comes to know the aspect of the truth of cessation.  Having rightly awakened to the aspect of the truth of cessation, he then rightly awakens to "the true path of counteraction": because with respect to the objects to be known it can thoroughly seek out the meaning 〔hence named the path〕, because it can truly seek out the meaning 〔hence named the fitting〕, because it turns in accordance by way of the four gateways 〔hence named the coursing〕, because it wholly and singly tends toward nirvāṇa 〔hence named the going-forth〕 — it is therefore named the path, the fitting, the coursing, and the going-forth. Thus the practitioner, by the four kinds of mode, comes to know the aspect of the truth of the path.  This is what is named the attention that apprehends the aspect of "the inward direct realization of the four noble truths."

6 · The Support That Is the Seed of the Knowledge of Dharmas and the Knowledge of the Kinds

Having thus inwardly, with respect to the directly-seen aggregates, in dependence on the principle of the truths, without error pondered and rightly contemplated, he then, with respect to the remaining aggregates that are "of a different portion of realms and not directly seen," contemplates by inference: namely, that those aggregates which are conditioned and with-outflow, in every place, in every kind, at every time, have such a dharma, fall under such a principle, have such a nature; that all cessation of them is a permanent quiescence, a constant abiding at ease; that all the path with respect to them can permanently cut off and be an ultimate going-forth-and-departure. It should be known that here: whether it be the "knowledge of the truths" with respect to the directly-seen aggregates, or the "knowledge of the truths by inference" with respect to the remaining objects of a different portion of realms and not directly seen — this is the support that is "able to produce the seed of the knowledge of dharmas and the knowledge of the kinds."  Again, this attention that apprehends the aspect, it should be known, is still interspersed with "hearing and reflection."

7 · The Attention of Resolute Conviction — the Knowledge of the Boundless · the Subduing of the Conceit "I Am" · Taking Mind as the Object of Mind

If the practitioner of contemplation, with respect to the truths, thus repeatedly rightly contemplates, and by the sixteen modes has gained a settled determination regarding "the principle that establishes and proves" of the four noble truths, and then, with respect to the truths' "being of the fullest extent and being just as it is," surpassing the attention interspersed with hearing and reflection, wholly and singly arouses the resolute conviction of cultivation — this is what is named the attention of resolute conviction.  This attention takes only the field of the truths as its object, and is wholly and singly within meditative concentration. Cultivating this and cultivating it much, within the field of the two truths of suffering and origination he gains "the knowledge of the boundless." By this knowledge he comes to know impermanence, and arouses "the resolute conviction of the boundlessness of impermanence"; thus coming to know suffering and the rest, he arouses "the resolute conviction of the boundlessness" of suffering, emptiness, no-self, evil conduct, going to evil destinies, flourishing-and-declining, and the aging, sickness, death, grief, lamentation, sorrow, pain, and every disturbance. This "boundlessness" is the flowing-and-turning of birth-and-death: these dharmas are boundless and limitless, down to where the flowing-and-turning of birth-and-death does not cease, and there are constantly such dharmas; only the ceasing-and-stilling of birth-and-death without remainder — this can be stilled, and there is no other means of stilling. With respect to just such dharmas of the various existences and destinies, of death and birth, by "the mode of wishlessness, the mode of relying on nothing, the mode of deep loathing-and-repulsion" he arouses resolute conviction, and diligently cultivates the attention of resolute conviction. And with respect to these various existences and various births he is, in the strengthened resolve, deeply and in his heart loathing and dreadful, and with respect to nirvāṇa he arouses in his heart, following upon a single practice, a deep aspiration and delight.  Through the long night, his mind has loved and delighted in the worldly forms, sounds, smells, tastes, and touches, and has been nourished and heaped up by forms, sounds, smells, tastes, and touches; by this cause-and-condition, though in his heart he deeply aspires and delights in nirvāṇa, yet he cannot enter into it, cannot realize its purity, cannot abide in it, cannot be resolutely convinced of it, and his mind draws back; with respect to the realm of quiescence he has not yet been able in his heart to give rise to a deep looking-up-and-longing, and, having moreover misgivings, his mind repeatedly loathes-and-departs and is startled-and-dread. Though with respect to all the two truths of suffering and origination he repeatedly and deeply in his heart loathes-and-departs and is startled-and-dread, and with respect to nirvāṇa he repeatedly arouses a deep aspiration-and-delight, still he cannot in his heart deeply enter in. Why? Because he still has "a coarse-grade conceit 'I am' that can obstruct direct realization" which enters into the attention, operating with interval and without interval, reflecting thus: "I have long flowed-and-turned in birth-and-death, I shall again flow-and-turn in birth-and-death; I shall be able to enter into nirvāṇa, I cultivate the various wholesome dharmas for the sake of nirvāṇa; I can contemplate suffering as truly being suffering, I can contemplate origination as truly being origination, I can contemplate cessation as truly being cessation, I can contemplate the path as truly being the path; I can contemplate emptiness as truly being emptiness, I contemplate the wishless as truly being wishless, I contemplate the markless as truly being markless; such dharmas are what I possess." By this cause-and-condition, though in his heart he deeply aspires and delights in nirvāṇa, yet his mind cannot enter into it.  Having come to know that this conceit "I am" is an obstruction, he can then swiftly, with wisdom, penetrate it, and cast off the attention that "operates spontaneously in accordance [with the conceit]," subdue every outer object to be known, and enter into the attention; proceeding in accordance with the attention, he singly and diligently, without interval, contemplates the noble truths; whenever a mind that has arisen fades and ceases, without interval a later mind arises to attend and contemplate, flowing on skillfully without interruption. Having thus "taken mind as the object of mind, singly diligent and without relief," he can cause that "coarse-grade conceit 'I am,' entering into the attention and obstructing direct realization," to have no room to arise.

8 · Entering into the Four Truths · Warmth · Summit · Acceptance · the Supreme Worldly Dharma

Thus the practitioner who diligently cultivates yoga: contemplating that the mind-continuum, turning-and-turning, is severally different, arising ever-newly, either increasing or decreasing, but momentary, coming spontaneously to the fore, altering before and after, is of the nature of impermanence; contemplating that the mind-continuum, being what is gathered under the "appropriating aggregates," is of the nature of suffering; contemplating that the mind-continuum, being "apart from a second dharma" (having no second self-dharma), is of the nature of emptiness; contemplating that the mind-continuum, being born from a concurrence of conditions and gaining no self-determination, is of the nature of no-self — this is named entering into the truth of suffering. Next, contemplating that the mind-continuum has craving as its cause, its origination, its arising, its condition — this is named entering into the truth of origination. Next, contemplating that the discriminating cessation belonging to this mind-continuum is of the nature of permanent cessation, permanent stilling, permanent sublimity, permanent departure — this is named entering into the truth of cessation. Next, contemplating that the ultimate counteraction of this mind-continuum, the path that tends toward cessation, is of the nature of the true path, the true fitting, the true coursing, the true going-forth — this is named entering into the truth of the path.  Thus, what was formerly not yet well contemplated is now, by the well-set attention as skillful means, contemplated; and by the subtle-and-fine wisdom he can rightly enter into the four noble truths; and, drawing near to, cultivating, and cultivating much this very wisdom, the right knowledge that "the object-that-apprehends and the object-apprehended are equal-and-equal" gets to arise. By its arising, he can cut off all the coarse-grade active conceit "I am" that "obstructs the loving delight in nirvāṇa"; and with respect to nirvāṇa he deeply and in his heart aspires and delights, and can swiftly enter in, his mind not drawing back, free of every dread, and receiving-and-retaining a strengthened resolve, glad and pleased.  Thus the practitioner, with respect to the noble truths:  Warmth — when the "knowledge that the object-that-apprehends and the object-apprehended are equal-and-equal" that is gathered by "lesser acceptance" arises, it is named warmth.  Summit — when the knowledge that the object-that-apprehends and the object-apprehended are equal-and-equal that is gathered by "middling acceptance" arises, it is named summit.  The acceptance in accord with the truths — when the knowledge that the object-that-apprehends and the object-apprehended are equal-and-equal that is gathered by "superior acceptance" arises, it is named the acceptance in accord with the truths.  Having thus cut off the obstructing coarse-grade conceit "I am," and, with respect to nirvāṇa, received-and-retained a strengthened resolve, glad and pleased, he can then cast off all the preparatory effort of "the further and further contemplating mind," and abide in a mind that is "without preparatory effort and without discrimination." At this time his mind "seems to cease but has not really ceased, seems to be without an object yet is not without a condition"; and at this time his mind is quiescent, "seeming as though secluded yet not 〔truly〕 secluded"; and at this time he is not overcast by delightful sleep, but has only a distinct tranquillity-practice, neither high nor low. 〔A distinction〕 There is another sort, the dark-and-dull, foolish person, overcast by delightful sleep, who within the "mind that seems to cease but has not really ceased" gives rise to overweening conceit, calling himself [one of] direct realization — this is not [true direct realization]. Having thus gained the "mind that tends toward direct realization," he will before long enter into the correct-nature-that-departs-from-birth.  The supreme worldly dharma — at just such a phase of the quiescent mind, the last moment of the non-discriminating mind, from this without interval, gives rise to an inward attention with respect to the aforecontemplated principle of the noble truths, and this is what is named the supreme worldly dharma. From this onward the supramundane mind arises, not a worldly mind; this is the last boundary, the very verge, of the worldly conditioned things, and is therefore named the supreme worldly dharma.

聲聞地 · 第四瑜伽處 · 出世間道 · 見道 · 究竟The Basic Section · The Śrāvaka Stage · The Fourth Yoga-Station · The Transcendent Path · The Path of Seeing · The Ultimate

全文五層 →Full five layers →
白話Vernacular

世第一法無間,出世心生——本葉即聲聞地的究竟收束:見道(三界見道所斷永斷·得三果)→ 現觀釋名 → 四智·四證淨 → 修道(進斷修惑)→ 修之自性·修業八種·修品類十一 → 攝樂作意 → 金剛喻三摩地(盡智·無生智·成阿羅漢·十無學·三住)→ 阿羅漢功德(梵行邊際·六恒住·有餘無餘依涅槃)→ 聲聞地總結。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

一、見道——見道所斷永斷·三果

從世第一法無間,於前所觀的諸聖諦理起內作意;作意無間,隨前次第所觀的諸諦——無論現見、非現見的諸聖諦中——如其次第,「無分別決定智、現見智」生起。由此生起故,三界所繫、見道所斷、「附屬所依」的諸煩惱品一切麁重,皆悉永斷。由此永斷故:  若先已離欲界貪的人,他此時既入這樣的諦現觀,便得「不還果」——他與前所說的離欲者相當知無異,然而這裡少有差別:當受化生,即於彼處當般涅槃,不再還來生此世間。  若先「倍離欲界貪」的人,他此時既入諦現觀,便得「一來果」。  若先未離欲界貪的人,他此時既入諦現觀,麁重永息,得「預流果」。

二、現觀釋名——剎帝利喻

由「能知智」與「所知境」和合無乖、現前觀察,所以名為「現觀」。如剎帝利與剎帝利和合無乖、現前觀察,名為現觀;婆羅門等當知亦爾。

三、四智·諦現觀眾多相狀·四證淨

這也成就眾多相狀:由證這樣的諦現觀,獲得「四智」——即於一切若行、若住的諸作意中善推求故,得「唯法智、非斷智、非常智、緣生行如幻事智」。又:若行於境界,由失念故雖起猛利諸煩惱纏,暫一作意便速疾除遣;又能畢竟不墮惡趣;終不故思違越所學,乃至傍生(畜生)亦不害命;終不退轉、棄捨所學;不復能造五無間業;定知苦樂非自所作、非他所作、非自他作、非「非自他無因」而生;終不求請外道為師、亦不對彼起福田想;對其他沙門、婆羅門等終不觀瞻其口及顏面〔不仰仗他人臉色〕;唯自見法、得法、知法、證法源底,越度疑惑、不由他緣;對大師(佛)之教非他所引;於諸法中得無所畏;終不妄計世間瑞相吉祥以為清淨;終不更受第八有生;具足成就「四種證淨」。  如此行者:乃至世第一法以前,名「勝解作意」;於諸聖諦現觀以後、乃至永斷見道所斷的一切煩惱,名「遠離作意」。

四、修道——進斷修惑·一來/不還果·觀察作意

從此以後,為了進斷「修所斷」的惑,如所得的道更數修習,永斷欲界上品、中品諸煩惱後,得「一來果」——如預流果所有諸相,這裡當知亦爾,然少差別:若行於境界,於能隨順上品猛利煩惱纏處由失念故暫起微劣諸煩惱纏,尋即作意速疾除遣;唯一度來生此世間,便能究竟作苦邊際。〔再進斷〕得「不還果」及不還相,如前已說。  當知這裡,由「觀察作意」,於一切修道數數觀察已斷、未斷,如所得道而正修習。

五、修——修自性·修業八種·修品類十一種

又這裡:怎麼名為修自性?怎麼名為修業?怎麼名為修品類差別?  修自性:由定地作意,於世間、出世間的善有為法修習增長,無間所作、殷重所作,令心相續會合那體性。這名為修之自性。  修業(八種):一、有一類法由修故「得」(先未得殊勝善法,修習令得);二、由修故「習」(先已得,令轉現前);三、由修故「淨」(先已得未令現前,由修彼種類法當令現前、令轉清淨鮮白生起);四、由修故「遣」(若失念染法現行,以修善法力令不忍受、斷除變吐);五、由修故「知」(未生起所應斷法,以修善法力了知如病,深心厭壞;了知如癰、如箭,障礙、無常、苦、空、無我,深心厭壞);六、由修故「斷」(如此知已數修習,無間道生、斷諸煩惱);七、由修故「證」(煩惱斷已,證得解脫);八、由修故「遠」(如如進趣上地善法,如是如是令下地已斷諸法轉成遠分,乃至究竟)。當知這名為八種修業。  修品類差別(十一種):一、奢摩他修(即九種行令心安住,如前已說);二、毘鉢舍那修(亦如前說);三、世間道修(於諸下地見麁相、於諸上地見靜相,乃至能趣無所有處一切離欲);四、出世道修(正思惟苦真是苦、集真是集、滅真是滅、道真是道,由正見等無漏聖道,乃至能趣非想非非想處一切離欲);五、下品道修(由此能斷最麁的上品煩惱);六、中品道修(由此能斷所有中品煩惱);七、上品道修(由此能斷所有最後所斷的下品煩惱);八、加行道修(由此為斷煩惱而發起加行);九、無間道修(由此正斷煩惱);十、解脫道修(由此於斷無間證得解脫);十一、勝進道修(由此從是已後修勝善法,乃至未起餘地煩惱的能治加行,或未起趣究竟位)。當知這名為十一種修品類差別。  如此於修勤修習的人,於時時之間,應正觀察所有煩惱已斷、未斷。

六、攝樂作意 → 金剛喻三摩地

於時時之間,於可厭法深心厭離;於時時之間,於可欣法深心欣慕——這名為攝樂作意。  他即於這攝樂作意親近、修習、多修習,便有「能無餘永斷修道所斷煩惱」的最後學位、喻如金剛的三摩地生起;由此生起,便能永斷修道所斷的一切煩惱。  問:什麼因緣,這三摩地名「金剛喻」?答:譬如金剛,望其餘一切末尼、真珠、琉璃、螺貝、璧玉、珊瑚等諸珍寶,最為堅固,能穿、能壞所餘寶物,而非餘寶物所能穿壞;如此這三摩地,於諸有學的三摩地中最上、最勝、最為堅固,能壞一切所有煩惱,非「上煩惱」所能蔽伏——所以這三摩地名「金剛喻」。  從這金剛喻三摩地,無間永害一切煩惱品的麁重「種子」,其心於彼究竟解脫,證得畢竟的「種姓清淨」。於諸煩惱究竟盡中,發起「盡智」;由因盡故,當來苦果畢竟不生,即於此中起「無生智」。他這時成阿羅漢——諸漏已盡、所作已辦、無復所作、證得自義、盡諸有結;已正奉行如來聖教,心善解脫;已具成就「十無學法」(即無學正見、正思惟,乃至無學正解脫、正智)。於諸住中及作意中,能隨自己的心自在而轉:隨所樂住——或「聖住」、或「天住」、或「梵住」中——即能安住;隨樂思惟所有正法、能引世間或出世間諸善義利,即能思惟。  「聖住」:謂空住、無願住、無相住、滅盡定住。「天住」:謂諸靜慮、諸無色住。「梵住」:謂慈住、悲住、喜住、捨住。

七、阿羅漢功德

又這時,至極究竟、畢竟無垢,畢竟證得「梵行邊際」:離諸關鍵,已出深坑、已度深塹,已能摧伏那「伊師迦」(高幢),是為真聖,摧滅高幢;已斷五支、成就六支;一向守護四所依止;最極遠離,獨一諦實,棄捨希求,無濁思惟,身行猗息;心善解脫、慧善解脫;獨一無侶,正行已立,名「已親近無上丈夫」。  具足成就「六恒住法」:眼見色後,無喜無憂,安住上捨,正念正知;如此耳聞聲後、鼻嗅香後、舌甞味後、身覺觸後、意了法後,都無喜無憂,安住上捨,正念正知。  他這時領受貪欲無餘永盡、瞋恚無餘永盡、愚癡無餘永盡;那貪瞋癡皆永盡故,不造諸惡、習近諸善,其心猶如虛空淨水、如妙香檀,普為一切天帝天王恭敬供養。住「有餘依」般涅槃界,度生死海、已到彼岸,亦名任持最後有身;先業煩惱所引的諸蘊自然滅故、餘取無故、不相續故,於「無餘依」般涅槃界而般涅槃——這中都無「般涅槃者」,如於生死無「流轉者」,唯有眾苦永滅、寂靜、清涼、滅沒;唯有此處最為寂靜,所謂棄捨一切所依,愛盡、離欲、永滅、涅槃。當知這中有如是相。  阿羅漢苾芻諸漏永盡,不能習近五種處所:一、不能故思殺害諸眾生命;二、不能不與而取;三、不能行非梵行、習婬欲法;四、不能知而妄語;五、不能貯畜、受用諸欲資具。如此也不能妄計苦樂自作、他作、自他俱作、非自他作無因而生;又不能怖畏一切「不應記」之事;又不能於雲、雷電、霹靂、災雹,及見種種怖畏事後深生驚怖。

八、配屬·依出世道證得究竟

當知這裡:金剛喻定所攝的作意,名「加行究竟作意」;最上阿羅漢果所攝的作意,名「加行究竟果作意」。由如此等多種作意,依出世道證得究竟。

九、聲聞地總結

如此一切,名為「聲聞地」。此是一切正等覺者所說的一切「聲聞相應教法」的根本——猶如一切名身、句身、文身,是所制造的文章、呪術、異論的根本。

With no interval after the highest-worldly dharmas, the transcendent mind arises — and this leaf is the ultimate consummation of the Śrāvaka Stage: the path of seeing (all that is to be eliminated by the path of seeing across the three realms is eliminated forever · the three fruits are gained) → the naming of direct realization → the four knowledges · the fourfold pure faith → the path of cultivation (progressively eliminating the afflictions of cultivation) → the intrinsic nature of cultivation · the eight acts of cultivation · the eleven classes of cultivation → the attention of joy-gathering → the vajra-like meditative concentration (the knowledge of exhaustion · the knowledge of non-arising · becoming an arhat · the ten [dharmas] of the adept · the three abidings) → the qualities of the arhat (the utmost limit of the holy life · the six constant abidings · nirvāṇa with and without remaining basis) → the general conclusion of the Śrāvaka Stage. The technical terms are kept as of old; every phrase is rendered into today's language, adding no doctrinal exposition, citing no treatise, glossing no Sanskrit; where the treatise-text is compressed, it is filled back in within 〔 〕.

1. The Path of Seeing — What Is to Be Eliminated by the Path of Seeing Is Eliminated Forever · the Three Fruits

With no interval after the highest-worldly dharmas, one raises an inward attention upon the principle of the noble truths contemplated before; with no interval after that attention, then — following the truths contemplated before in their proper sequence, whether among the noble truths that are directly seen or those not directly seen — there arises, in due order, the "non-discriminating decisive knowledge, the directly-seeing knowledge." Because this arises, all the coarse-and-heavy of the classes of affliction that are bound to the three realms, that are to be eliminated by the path of seeing, and that are "attached to the basis," are all eliminated forever. Because of this eliminating-forever:

 If one has already, beforehand, become free of craving for the desire realm, then, having now entered this direct realization of the truths, he gains the "fruit of the non-returner" — he should be known to be no different from the one who was said before to be free of craving, yet here there is a slight difference: he will take a birth by transformation, and precisely there will attain final nirvāṇa, no longer returning to be born again in this world.

 If one has beforehand "become doubly free of craving for the desire realm," then, having now entered the direct realization of the truths, he gains the "fruit of the once-returner."

 If one has beforehand not yet become free of craving for the desire realm, then, having now entered the direct realization of the truths, the coarse-and-heavy is stilled forever, and he gains the "fruit of the stream-enterer."

2. The Naming of Direct Realization — the Kṣatriya Simile

Because the "knowing knowledge" and the "known object" join together without discord and observe [each other] face to face, it is therefore named "direct realization." Just as a kṣatriya and a kṣatriya join together without discord and observe [each other] face to face, and this is named direct realization; and the brahmin and the rest should be understood likewise.

3. The Four Knowledges · the Many Marks of the Direct Realization of the Truths · the Fourfold Pure Faith

This too accomplishes many marks: by realizing this direct realization of the truths, one obtains the "four knowledges" — that is, because one well seeks out [the truth] within all the attentions, whether while moving or while staying, one gains "the knowledge that there is only dharma, the knowledge that is not [of] annihilation, the knowledge that is not [of] permanence, and the knowledge that conditioned formations are dependently arisen and like an illusion." Further: even if, while coursing among sense-objects, he should — through a lapse of mindfulness — give rise to fierce enwrapping afflictions, a single moment of attention swiftly dispels them; and he is able, once and for all, not to fall into the evil destinies; he will never deliberately transgress what he has trained in, and will not take the life even of an animal (a beast); he will never turn back or cast aside what he has trained in; he is no longer able to commit the five acts of immediate [retribution]; he knows for certain that pain and pleasure are not made by oneself, not made by another, not made by both oneself and another, and do not arise "without cause, made neither by oneself nor by another"; he will never seek to take a non-Buddhist as his teacher, nor conceive of such a one as a field of merit; toward other ascetics, brahmins, and the like, he will never watch their mouth and countenance 〔he does not rely on another's expression〕; he sees the dharma for himself alone, gains the dharma, knows the dharma, and realizes the very source and bottom of the dharma, crossing beyond doubt and hesitation, not [depending] on other conditions; regarding the teaching of the Great Master (the Buddha), he is not led by another; among the dharmas he gains fearlessness; he will never falsely reckon worldly auspicious signs and good omens to be purity; he will never again undergo an eighth existence-and-birth; and he fully accomplishes the "four kinds of pure faith."

 For such a practitioner: up to and before the highest-worldly dharmas, [his attention] is named the "attention of resolute conviction"; and from the direct realization of the noble truths onward, until he has eliminated forever all the afflictions to be eliminated by the path of seeing, [his attention] is named the "attention of seclusion."

4. The Path of Cultivation — Progressively Eliminating the Afflictions of Cultivation · the Fruit of the Once-Returner / Non-Returner · the Attention of Investigation

From this point onward, in order to progressively eliminate the afflictions "to be eliminated by cultivation," he cultivates the path he has gained yet more, again and again; and having eliminated forever the higher-grade and middle-grade afflictions of the desire realm, he gains the "fruit of the once-returner" — the various marks are as with the fruit of the stream-enterer, to be understood here likewise, yet with a slight difference: if, while coursing among sense-objects, at a spot able to conform to a higher-grade, fierce enwrapping affliction, he should, through a lapse of mindfulness, momentarily give rise to a faint, feeble enwrapping affliction, he at once brings an attention to bear and swiftly dispels it; he will come to be born in this world but a single time, and will then be able to bring about, once and for all, the limit of suffering. 〔Eliminating further〕, he gains the "fruit of the non-returner" and the marks of the non-returner, as already said before.

 Here it should be known: through the "attention of investigation," within all cultivation of the path he investigates again and again what has been eliminated and what has not been eliminated, and duly cultivates the path he has gained.

5. Cultivation — the Intrinsic Nature of Cultivation · the Eight Acts of Cultivation · the Eleven Classes of Cultivation

Further, here: what is called the intrinsic nature of cultivation? What is called the act of cultivation? What is called the differentiation of the classes of cultivation?

 The intrinsic nature of cultivation: by an attention on the ground of concentration, one cultivates and increases the wholesome conditioned dharmas of the world and beyond the world — done without interval, done with earnest esteem — causing the mental continuum to meet with and merge into that essential nature. This is named the intrinsic nature of cultivation.

 The acts of cultivation (eight kinds): (1) There is a class of dharma that, through cultivation, is "gained" (a surpassing wholesome dharma not gained before is, through cultivation, caused to be gained). (2) Through cultivation it is "practiced" (what is already gained is caused to turn into the present). (3) Through cultivation it is "purified" (what is already gained but not yet made present is, by cultivating dharmas of its kind, caused to become present, and caused to turn pure, white, and fresh, arising). (4) Through cultivation it is "expelled" (if, through a lapse of mindfulness, a defiled dharma becomes active, then by the power of cultivating wholesome dharmas one causes [oneself] not to endure it, and cuts it off, vomiting it out). (5) Through cultivation it is "known" (a dharma to be eliminated that has not yet arisen is, by the power of cultivating wholesome dharmas, understood as a disease and, with deep mind, held in aversion; understood as a boil, as an arrow, as an obstruction, as impermanent, suffering, empty, and without self, and, with deep mind, held in aversion). (6) Through cultivation it is "eliminated" (having known thus, one cultivates again and again, an uninterrupted path arises, and the afflictions are eliminated). (7) Through cultivation it is "realized" (the afflictions being eliminated, one realizes liberation). (8) Through cultivation it is "distanced" (as one advances toward the wholesome dharmas of a higher ground, so, in just that measure, one causes the dharmas already eliminated of a lower ground to turn into the "distant portion," and so on to the ultimate). This should be known as the eight kinds of act of cultivation.

 The differentiation of the classes of cultivation (eleven kinds): (1) the cultivation of calm-abiding (that is, the nine modes of causing the mind to settle in abiding, as already said before); (2) the cultivation of insight (likewise as said before); (3) the cultivation of the worldly path (seeing the coarse mark in the lower grounds and the calm mark in the higher grounds, and so on to the [path] that can proceed to the total freedom from craving of the sphere of nothing-whatever); (4) the cultivation of the transcendent path (rightly considering that suffering is truly suffering, that origination is truly origination, that cessation is truly cessation, that the path is truly the path — and, by the uncontaminated noble path of right view and the rest, and so on to the [path] that can proceed to the total freedom from craving of the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception); (5) the cultivation of the lower-grade path (by which one can eliminate the coarsest, higher-grade afflictions); (6) the cultivation of the middle-grade path (by which one can eliminate all the middle-grade afflictions); (7) the cultivation of the higher-grade path (by which one can eliminate all the last-eliminated, lower-grade afflictions); (8) the cultivation of the path of preparatory effort (by which one sets going the preparatory effort for the sake of eliminating the afflictions); (9) the cultivation of the uninterrupted path (by which one rightly eliminates the afflictions); (10) the cultivation of the path of liberation (by which, without interval after the eliminating, one realizes liberation); (11) the cultivation of the path of further distinction (by which, from that point onward, one cultivates surpassing wholesome dharmas, and so on until one has not yet given rise to the counteracting preparatory effort for the afflictions of a remaining ground, or has not yet given rise to the [effort] proceeding to the ultimate stage). This should be known as the eleven kinds of differentiation of the classes of cultivation.

 One who, cultivating thus, diligently cultivates should, from time to time, rightly investigate which afflictions have been eliminated and which have not.

6. The Attention of Joy-Gathering → the Vajra-Like Meditative Concentration

From time to time, toward the dharmas that may be held in aversion, [he sets] deep aversion; from time to time, toward the dharmas that may be gladly desired, [he sets] deep glad longing — this is named the attention of joy-gathering.

 Drawing near to, cultivating, and cultivating much just this attention of joy-gathering, there arises the meditative concentration of the last stage of the learner, likened to the vajra, "able to eliminate forever, without remainder, the afflictions to be eliminated by the path of cultivation"; because of its arising, one is able to eliminate forever all the afflictions to be eliminated by the path of cultivation.

 Question: for what cause and condition is this meditative concentration named "vajra-like"? Answer: just as the vajra, set against all the other precious things — jewel, pearl, beryl, conch and cowry, jade disc, coral, and the rest — is the most solid, able to pierce and to break the remaining treasures, while it cannot be pierced or broken by the remaining treasures; so too this meditative concentration, among the meditative concentrations of all who are still learners, is the highest, the most excellent, the most solid, able to break all the afflictions there are, and cannot be overshadowed and subdued by the "higher afflictions" — this is why this meditative concentration is named "vajra-like."

 From this vajra-like meditative concentration, without interval, one harms forever the coarse-and-heavy "seeds" of all the classes of affliction; his mind is ultimately liberated therefrom, and he realizes the final "purity of lineage." Within the ultimate exhaustion of all the afflictions, he sets going the "knowledge of exhaustion"; and because the cause is exhausted, the fruit of suffering to come is finally not born, and precisely herein he raises the "knowledge of non-arising." At this time he becomes an arhat — his contaminants exhausted, what was to be done done, nothing further to be done, his own aim realized, all the fetters of existence exhausted; he has rightly practiced the noble teaching of the Tathāgata, his mind well liberated; and he has fully accomplished the "ten dharmas of the adept" (namely the adept's right view, right thought, and so on to the adept's right liberation and right knowledge). Among the abidings and the attentions, he is able to turn as he wills, in mastery of his own mind: whatever abiding he takes joy in — whether "the noble abiding," "the heavenly abiding," or "the sublime abiding" (brahma-vihāra) — there he can settle and abide; and whatever right dharmas he takes joy in considering, able to draw forth wholesome benefits of the world or beyond the world, those he can consider.

 "The noble abiding": that is, the abiding in emptiness, the abiding in the wishless, the abiding in the markless, the abiding in the attainment of cessation. "The heavenly abiding": that is, the abidings in the meditative absorptions and in the formless [attainments]. "The sublime abiding": that is, the abiding in loving-kindness, the abiding in compassion, the abiding in sympathetic joy, the abiding in equanimity.

7. The Qualities of the Arhat

Further, at this time, at the very utmost and ultimate, finally without stain, he finally realizes the "utmost limit of the holy life": free of all the bolts and bars, he has climbed out of the deep pit and crossed the deep moat, and has been able to crush the "iṣīkā" (the lofty standard) — he is a true noble one, who has crushed and destroyed the lofty standard; he has severed the five limbs and accomplished the six limbs; he wholly guards the four bases of reliance; utterly secluded, single and truthful, casting off longing, with untroubled thought, his bodily activity stilled to rest; his mind well liberated and his wisdom well liberated; single and without companion, his right practice established, he is named "one who has drawn near to the supreme great man."

 He fully accomplishes the "six constant-abiding dharmas": having seen a form with the eye, he is without gladness and without sorrow, abiding in supreme equanimity, in right mindfulness and right awareness; likewise having heard a sound with the ear, having smelled a scent with the nose, having tasted a flavor with the tongue, having felt a touch with the body, and having cognized a dharma with the mind, he is in every case without gladness and without sorrow, abiding in supreme equanimity, in right mindfulness and right awareness.

 At this time he experiences the exhausting-forever, without remainder, of greed; the exhausting-forever, without remainder, of hatred; the exhausting-forever, without remainder, of delusion; and because that greed, hatred, and delusion are all exhausted forever, he commits no evils and draws near to the wholesome, his mind like the pure water of open space, like fine fragrant sandalwood, revered and made offering to by all the heavenly emperors and heavenly kings. Abiding in the realm of nirvāṇa "with remaining basis," he has crossed the sea of birth-and-death and reached the far shore — this is also named the sustaining of the last body possessed. And because the aggregates drawn forth by prior karma and affliction naturally cease, because there is no remaining grasping, and because there is no continuity, he attains final nirvāṇa in the realm of nirvāṇa "without remaining basis" — herein there is no "one who attains final nirvāṇa" at all, just as in birth-and-death there is no "one who transmigrates"; there is only the eternal ceasing of the mass of sufferings, the stillness, the coolness, the fading-away; only this place is the most still — namely the casting-off of all basis, the exhaustion of craving, the freedom from craving, the eternal ceasing, nirvāṇa. It should be known that herein there are marks such as these.

 The arhat, a bhikṣu whose contaminants are exhausted forever, is unable to draw near to five sorts of place: (1) he is unable deliberately to slay the life of living beings; (2) he is unable to take what is not given; (3) he is unable to engage in unchaste conduct and to practice the way of lust; (4) he is unable knowingly to speak falsely; (5) he is unable to hoard up and make use of the requisites of the desires. Thus too he is unable falsely to reckon that pain and pleasure are made by oneself, made by another, made by both oneself and another, or arise without cause, made neither by oneself nor by another; and he is unable to dread any of the "matters not to be declared"; and he is unable, upon cloud, thunder and lightning, thunderbolt, and hailstorm, and upon seeing manifold dreadful matters, to give rise to deep alarm and terror.

8. Assignment · Realizing the Ultimate by the Transcendent Path

Here it should be known: the attention subsumed under the vajra-like concentration is named the "attention of the culmination of preparatory effort"; and the attention subsumed under the highest fruit, the arhat, is named the "attention of the fruit of the culmination of preparatory effort." By such manifold attentions, one realizes the ultimate by the transcendent path.

9. The General Conclusion of the Śrāvaka Stage

All of this is named the "Śrāvaka Stage." This is the root of all the "teaching-dharma associated with the śrāvakas" spoken by all the Fully and Perfectly Awakened Ones — just as all the assemblages of names, of phrases, and of syllables are the root of the compositions, incantations, and heterodox treatises that are fashioned.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing — with AI-assisted consistency checking

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0