瑜伽師地論 聲聞地 · 第二瑜伽處 · 善巧淨惑+修學六科

心要Essence

補齊所緣(善巧治愚·淨惑斷惑·四種所緣竟),再立修學骨架(教授·學·隨順·壞·瑜伽·作意)。眼:脊樑=三勝學(戒定慧)——聲聞道總綱,亦後出唯識修道之所本。

一句話:所緣後二——善巧所緣(蘊界處緣起處非處五·攝自相/共相二·蘊善巧「唯蘊可得·非離蘊有我」破我執)+淨惑所緣(世間道觀麁靜伏惑·出世間道觀四諦斷惑·四諦四病喻);四種所緣竟。修學六科——教授(四教授+三神變)·三勝學(戒「建立定」·心「智所依」·慧「辨所作」·戒果鏈·所趣/最勝二增上義·三根·三解脫門)·隨順學法(十違逆·十想·四光明)·瑜伽壞(四·邪行「像似正法」誡)·四瑜伽(信欲精進方便·十六)·四作意(力勵/有間/無間/無功用·+四相·九勝解·三瑜伽師)。

三個眼目

  1. 三勝學=戒定慧總綱(脊樑·後出所本)〔T30 0435c–0436b〕:唯三所以=戒「建立定」(令心一境觸三摩地)·心「智所依」(正定令如實智見)·慧「辨所作」(證究竟煩惱斷)。次第=戒果鏈(尸羅淨→無憂悔→歡喜→安樂→正定→如實知見→厭→離染→解脫→無作涅槃)。增上=所趣義(趣上學修下學)+最勝義(唯聖教不共外道)。有慧必具三學(慧為宗·戒定為基)。三根(未知欲知/已知/具知)·三解脫門(空/無願/無相)。→ 此即《百法》《三十頌》乃至唯識五位修道之所本綱。

  2. 善巧破我·四諦四喻(治愚斷惑):蘊善巧三義(種種差別·非一眾多·除此更無所得「唯蘊可得·非離蘊有我·無少法是我所有」〔T30 0433c〕)=破薩迦耶見;界(因/種子)·處(三緣生六識)·緣起(唯法引法無常無我)·處非處(因果不亂);攝自相/共相二善巧。淨惑:世間道麁靜(暫斷·伏)·出世間四諦——苦如病〔遍知〕·集如病因〔遠離〕·滅如無病〔觸證〕·道如良藥〔修習〕〔T30 0435a〕;三苦(苦苦/壞苦/行苦)。

  3. 瑜伽壞·像似正法誡+賴耶伏線(誡與唯識底色):瑜伽壞四(畢竟〔無種姓〕/暫時〔有種姓〕/退失所得/邪行);邪行=自立不順契經/不現戒律/違逆法性之偽瑜伽·為利養覆藏不示三藏者·「像似正法·非真正法·能障正法」〔T30 0437c〕——凡瑜伽以經律法三尺撿驗。賴耶伏線:識蘊二解「賴耶名心·末那稱意·六識名識」·行苦「賴耶捨受是體」〔遁倫 T42 0450a07·0451b01〕——聲聞地四諦已露賴耶/末那,與種姓地「墮賴耶意界」一線(古德唯識讀法·唯錄·非單向承用)。

附註:善巧承遍滿《頡隸伐多經》「愚自相→蘊善巧」之機;淨惑世間道啟第三瑜伽處離欲、出世間四諦啟見道;四作意/三瑜伽師→瑜伽修(13-02-04 三十七菩提分·四念住承上子十六勝行)。古德偏倚遁倫《論記》卷七〔T42 0449c19–0453b23·諸論善巧數異唯錄·三勝學·四光明景師三暗對治·瑜伽壞三釋·賴耶捨受行苦·景/泰/基/法師〕;窺基《略纂》卷八〔T43 0115a03–0115a26〕高度闕釋(僅三學·瑜伽壞退失所得一句;善巧/淨惑/教授/作意四 闕)。義理開講見〈義疏〉。

Complete the objects (skillfulness cures dullness · affliction-purifying severs affliction · the four kinds of object told out), then set up the skeleton of training (instruction · the trainings · conformity · ruin · yoga · attention). The point of the eye: the spine = the three higher trainings (discipline, concentration, wisdom) — the master-outline of the śrāvaka path, and the ground on which the later Consciousness-Only path of cultivation rests.

In one line: The latter two objects — the skillfulness objects (five: aggregates, elements, sense-fields, dependent origination, the possible-and-impossible · gathering into the two, intrinsic and common characteristics · skillfulness in the aggregates: "only aggregates are to be found · apart from the aggregates there is no self," breaking self-grasping) and the affliction-purifying objects (the mundane path contemplates coarse-and-peaceful and subdues affliction · the supramundane path contemplates the four truths and severs affliction · the four-truths-four-sickness simile); the four kinds of object are told out. The six rubrics of training — instruction (four instructions + three miracles) · the three higher trainings (discipline "establishes concentration" · mind "is that on which knowledge rests" · wisdom "discerns what is to be done" · the chain of the fruits of discipline · the two senses of "higher," that-toward-which-one-tends / the most excellent · three faculties · three doors of liberation) · the factors conducive to training (ten contrary · ten conceptions · four lights) · the ruining of yoga (four · the "semblance of the true Dharma" caution against wrong conduct) · the four yogas (trust, aspiration, effort, skillful means · sixteen) · the four attentions (forcing / with-intervals / without-interval / effortless · + four aspects · nine resolute convictions · three kinds of yoga-practitioner).

Three Points of the Eye

  1. The three higher trainings = the master-outline of discipline-concentration-wisdom (the spine · the ground of what comes later) 〔T30 0435c–0436b〕: why only three = discipline "establishes concentration" (brings the mind to a single object, touches samādhi) · mind "is that on which knowledge rests" (right concentration brings true knowing-and-seeing) · wisdom "discerns what is to be done" (realizes the final severance of affliction). The order = the chain of the fruits of discipline (pure śīla → freedom from worry and regret → gladness → ease and joy → right concentration → knowing-and-seeing as it truly is → disenchantment → freedom from defilement → liberation → the actionless nirvāṇa). "Higher" = the sense of that-toward-which-one-tends (cultivate the lower training to tend toward the upper) + the sense of the most excellent (belonging to the holy teaching alone, not held in common with the outer paths). One who has wisdom necessarily possesses all three trainings (wisdom is the highest term · discipline and concentration the foundation). Three faculties (I-shall-come-to-know-the-unknown / already-knowing / endowed-with-knowing) · three doors of liberation (emptiness / wishlessness / marklessness). → This is the master-outline on which the Hundred Dharmas, the Thirty Verses, and even the five-stage Consciousness-Only path of cultivation rest.

  2. Skillfulness breaks the self · the four truths and four similes (curing dullness, severing affliction): skillfulness in the aggregates, three senses (manifold differences · not-one-but-many · apart from these nothing is to be found, "only aggregates are to be found · apart from the aggregates there is no self · not any single dharma is 'mine'" 〔T30 0433c〕) = breaking the view of the transitory collection as a self; elements (cause / seed) · sense-fields (six consciousnesses arise by three conditions) · dependent origination (dharmas drawing forth dharmas, impermanent and without self) · the possible-and-impossible (cause and effect not disordered); gathering into the two skillfulnesses, intrinsic and common characteristics. Affliction-purifying: the mundane path, coarse-and-peaceful (temporary severance · subduing) · the supramundane four truths — suffering like a sickness 〔thoroughly known〕 · origination like the cause of the sickness 〔kept far off〕 · cessation like the state of no-sickness 〔touched-and-realized〕 · the path like a fine medicine 〔cultivated〕 〔T30 0435a〕; the three sufferings (of suffering / of change / of conditioned states).

  3. The ruining of yoga · the "semblance of the true Dharma" caution + the buried thread of the store consciousness (caution and the ground-color of Consciousness-Only): the ruining of yoga is fourfold (final 〔without lineage〕 / temporary 〔with lineage〕 / loss of what was attained / wrong conduct); wrong conduct = a forged yoga set up on one's own, not according with the discourses / not appearing in the disciplines / running counter to the nature of dharmas · covered over for the sake of gain and not shown to one versed in the Tripiṭaka · "a semblance of the true Dharma · not the truly true Dharma · able to obstruct the true Dharma" 〔T30 0437c〕 — every yoga is to be checked against the three rulers of the discourses, the disciplines, and the nature of dharmas. The buried thread of the store consciousness: the two glosses of the consciousness-aggregate, "the store consciousness named 'mind' · mentation named 'the deliberating' · the six consciousnesses named 'consciousness,'" and the suffering of conditioned states, "the store consciousness's indifferent feeling is its substance" 〔Dunlun T42 0450a07 · 0451b01〕 — the Śrāvaka Stage's four truths already let show the store consciousness and mentation, one line with "falling into the store, into the element of mentation" in the Stage of Lineage (the ancient masters' Consciousness-Only reading · recorded only · not a one-way inheritance).

Note: skillfulness carries on the all-pervading Hastikakṣya-sūtra's occasion, "dullness toward the intrinsic characteristic → skillfulness in the aggregates"; the affliction-purifying mundane path opens the way to the dispassion of the third yoga-station, the supramundane four truths to the path of seeing; the four attentions / three kinds of yoga-practitioner → the cultivation-of-yoga (13-02-04 the thirty-seven factors of awakening · the four foundations of mindfulness carrying on the sixteen excellent practices of the preceding unit). The ancient masters lean chiefly on Dunlun's Notes on the Treatise, fascicle seven 〔T42 0449c19–0453b23 · the several treatises' varying counts of skillfulness recorded only · the three higher trainings · Jing's countering of the three darknesses by the four lights · the three glosses of the ruining of yoga · the store consciousness's indifferent feeling as the suffering of conditioned states · the masters Jing / Tai / Kuiji / Fa〕; Kuiji's Concise Compendium, fascicle eight 〔T43 0115a03–0115a26〕 is highly abbreviated in its glossing (only the three trainings · a single line on the "loss of what was attained" among the ruinings of yoga; skillfulness / affliction-purifying / instruction / attention, all four, unglossed). The doctrinal opening-out is seen in the 〈Exposition〉.

原典Canonical · verbatim

云何名為善巧所緣? 謂此所緣略有五種。一、蘊善巧,二、界善巧,三、處善巧,四、緣起善巧,五、處非處善巧。 蘊善巧者,云何蘊?云何蘊善巧? 謂蘊有五。則色蘊、受蘊、想蘊、行蘊、識蘊。 云何色蘊?謂諸所有色,一切皆是四大種及四大種所造。此復若過去、若未來、若現在、若內、若外、若麁、若細、若劣、若勝、若遠、若近。總名色蘊。 云何受蘊?謂或順樂觸為緣諸受,或順苦觸為緣諸受,或順不苦不樂觸為緣諸受。復有六受身。則眼觸所生受,耳、鼻、舌、身、意觸所生受。總名受蘊。 云何想蘊?謂有相想、無相想、狹小想、廣大想、無量想、無諸所有無所有處想。復有六想身。則眼觸所生想,耳、鼻、舌、身、意觸所生想。總名想蘊。 云何行蘊?謂六思身。則眼觸所生思,耳、鼻、舌、身、意觸所生思。復有所餘,除受及想諸心法等。總名行蘊。 云何識蘊?謂心、意、識。復有六識身。則眼識,耳、鼻、舌、身、意識。總名識蘊。前受、想、行蘊及此識蘊,皆有過去、未來、現在、內、外等差別,如前廣說。是名為蘊。 云何蘊善巧?謂善了知如所說蘊種種差別性、非一眾多性,除此法外,更無所得、無所分別,是名略說蘊善巧義。 云何名蘊種種差別性?謂色蘊異、受蘊異,乃至識蘊異,是名種種差別性。 云何名蘊非一眾多性?謂色蘊非一眾多品類。大種所造差別故,去來今等品類差別故。是名色蘊非一眾多性。如是餘蘊,隨其所應皆當了知。 云何除此法外,更無所得、無所分別?謂唯蘊可得、唯事可得。非離蘊外有我可得,有常恒住無變易法是可得者。亦無少法是我所有。故除此外,更無所得、無所分別。 云何界?云何界善巧? 謂界有十八。則眼界、色界、眼識界,耳界、聲界、耳識界,鼻界、香界、鼻識界,舌界、味界、舌識界,身界、觸界、身識界,意界、法界、意識界。是名為界。 若復於彼十八種法,從別別界、別別種子、別別種姓生起出現,如實了知、忍可、審察,名界善巧。如實了知十八種法,從別別界別別而轉,即於因緣而得善巧,是故說此名界善巧。 云何處?云何處善巧? 謂處有十二。則眼處、色處、耳處、聲處、鼻處、香處、舌處、味處、身處、觸處、意處、法處。是名為處。 處善巧者,謂眼為增上緣,色為所緣緣,等無間滅意為等無間緣,生起眼識,及相應法。耳為增上緣,聲為所緣緣,等無間滅意為等無間緣,生起耳識及相應法。如是乃至意為等無間緣,此生作意為增上緣,法為所緣緣,生起意識及相應法。如是六識身及相應法,皆由三緣而得流轉。謂增上緣、所緣緣、等無間緣。若於如是諸內外處緣得善巧,名處善巧。 云何緣起?云何緣起善巧? 謂無明緣行,行緣識,識緣名色,名色緣六處,六處緣觸,觸緣受,受緣愛,愛緣取,取緣有,有緣生,生緣老死,乃至招集如是純大苦蘊。是名緣起。 若復了知唯有諸法滋潤諸法,唯有諸法等潤諸法,唯有諸行引發諸行;而彼諸行因所生故、緣所生故,本無而有,有已散滅,體是無常。是無常故,即是生法,老法,病法,死法,愁、悴、悲、嘆、憂、苦、惱法;是生法故,乃至是惱法故,則名為苦。由是苦故,不得自在,其力羸劣,由是因緣,定無有我。若於如是緣生法中,由如是等種種行相,善巧了達,或無常智、或苦智、或無我智,是名緣起善巧。 又處非處善巧,當知即是緣起善巧差別。此中差別者,謂由處非處善巧故,能正了知非不平等因果道理。則善不善法有果異熟。若諸善法能感可愛果異熟法,諸不善法能感非愛果異熟法。若能如是如實了知,名處非處善巧。 此五善巧略則為二。一、自相善巧,二、共相善巧。由蘊善巧顯自相善巧;由餘善巧顯共相善巧。 如是總名善巧所緣。 云何淨惑所緣?謂觀下地麁性、上地靜性。如欲界對初靜慮,乃至無所有處對非想非非想處。云何麁性?謂麁性有二。一、體麁性,二、數麁性。體麁性者,謂欲界望初靜慮,雖皆具五蘊,而欲界中過患深重,苦住增上,最為鄙劣,甚可厭惡,是故說彼為體麁性。 初靜慮中則不如是,極靜、極妙,是故說彼為體靜性。數麁性者,謂欲界色蘊有多品類,應知應斷,如是乃至識蘊亦爾,是故說彼為數麁性。如是上地展轉相望,若體麁性、若數麁性,隨其所應,當知亦爾。如是麁性,於諸上地展轉相望,乃至極於無所有處,一切下地苦惱增多,壽量減少;一切上地苦惱減少,壽量增多。非想非非想處唯靜、唯妙,更無上地勝過此故。以要言之,有過患義是麁性義。若彼彼地中過患增多,即由如是過患增多性故,名為麁性。若彼彼地中過患減少,即由如是過患減少性故,名為靜性。此是世間由世俗道淨惑所緣。何以故?彼觀下地多諸過患,如病、如癰,猶如毒箭,不安隱性,以為麁性;觀於上地與彼相違,以為靜性。斷除下地所有煩惱,始從欲界乃至上極無所有處。此是暫斷,非究竟斷。以於後時、更相續故。 出世間道淨惑所緣復有四種。一、苦聖諦,二、集聖諦,三、滅聖諦,四、道聖諦。 云何苦聖諦?謂生苦、老苦、病苦、死苦、怨憎會苦、愛別離苦、求不得苦、略說一切五取蘊苦、名苦聖諦。 云何集聖諦?謂若愛、若後有愛、若喜貪俱行愛、若彼彼喜樂愛等,名集聖諦。 云何滅聖諦?謂即此愛等無餘斷滅,名滅聖諦。 云何道聖諦?謂八支等聖道,名道聖諦。當知此中,依黑品白品果因建立故,建立四聖諦。謂苦諦是黑品果;集諦是黑品因;滅諦是白品果;道諦是白品因,能得、能證故。又苦諦如病,初應遍知;集諦如病因緣,次應遠離;滅諦如無病,次應觸證;道諦如良藥,復應修習及多修習。 又苦諦苦義,乃至道諦道義,是如是實,非不如實;是無顛倒,非是顛倒;故名為諦。又彼自相無有虛誑,及見彼故無倒覺轉。是故名諦。 問:何故諸諦唯名聖諦? 答:唯諸聖者於是諸諦同謂為諦,如實了知、如實觀見;一切愚夫不如實知、不如實見。是故諸諦唯名聖諦。又於愚夫,唯由法爾說名為諦,不由覺悟。於諸聖者俱由二種。 又生苦者,謂於生時發生種種身心苦受,非生自體即是其苦。為苦因緣,故名為苦。廣說乃至求不得苦,謂由所求不得因緣發生種種身心苦受,非求不得體即是苦。為苦因緣,故名為苦。 如是當知略說一切五取蘊苦。謂由生等異門,唯顯了苦苦;由此五取蘊苦,亦顯了所餘壞苦、行苦。所以者何?如五取蘊具攝三受,如是能與如前所說苦苦為器;當知此中,亦即具有前所未說壞苦、行苦。 問:何故世尊苦苦一種以自聲說,壞苦、行苦以異門說? 答:於苦苦中,若凡、若聖,一切等有苦覺慧轉。又苦苦性極可厭患。又從先來未習慧者,纔為說時則便易入。又於諸諦,令所調伏可化有情易得入故。 云何建立三種苦性?謂先所說生苦乃至求不得苦,即顯苦受及所依處為苦苦性,如是名為建立苦苦性。諸有是彼所對治法。謂少是老所治,無病是病所治,命是死所治,親愛合會是怨憎會所治,非愛別離是愛別離所治,所求稱遂是求不得所治。復有苦受及所依處所起煩惱,復有無病等順樂受處等及彼所生受所起煩惱,如是總說為壞苦性。此中樂受及所依處,由無常故,若變若異,受彼增上所生眾苦。若諸煩惱,於一切處正生起時,纏縛其心,令心變壞,即生眾苦。故名壞苦。如世尊言:入變壞心,執母邑手,乃至廣說。又如說言:住貪欲纏,領受貪欲纏緣所生身心憂苦;如是住瞋恚、惛沈睡眠、掉舉惡作、疑纏,領受彼纏緣所生身心憂苦。由此至教第一至教,諸煩惱中苦義可得,壞義可得,故說煩惱為壞苦性。如是名為建立壞苦性。若行苦性,遍行一切五取蘊中。以要言之,除苦苦性,除煩惱攝變壞苦性,除樂受攝及所依處變壞苦性,諸餘不苦不樂受俱行,若彼所生、若生彼緣、若生住器所有諸蘊,名行苦性。由彼諸蘊其性無常,生滅相應,有一切取,三受麁重之所隨逐,不安隱攝,不脫苦苦及以壞苦,不自在轉。由行苦故,說名為苦。如是名為建立行苦性。又即彼愛亦名希求,亦名欣欲,亦名喜樂。即此希求由三門轉。謂希求後有,及希求境界。若希求後有,名後有愛。希求境界復有二種。謂於已得境界,有喜著俱行愛;若於未得境界,有希求和合俱行愛。當知此中,於已得境界喜著俱行愛,名喜貪俱行愛;於未得境界希求和合俱行愛,名彼彼喜樂愛。 滅有二種。一、煩惱滅,二、所依滅。道有二種。一、有學道,二、無學道。 如是當知名出世道淨惑所緣。 如是已說四種所緣。一、遍滿所緣,二、淨行所緣,三、善巧所緣,四、淨惑所緣。 云何教授?謂四教授。一、無倒教授,二、漸次教授,三、教教授,四、證教授。 云何無倒教授?謂無顛倒宣說法義,令其受持、讀誦、修學,如實出離,正盡眾苦,作苦邊際。如是名為無倒教授。 云何漸次教授?謂稱時機宣說法義,先令受持讀誦淺近,後方令彼學深遠處。又為令入初諦現觀,先教苦諦,後集滅道。又為令得靜慮等至,先教最初靜慮等至,後教其餘靜慮等至。如是等類,應知名為漸次教授。 云何教教授?謂從尊重、若似尊重,達解瑜伽軌範、親教,或諸如來,或佛弟子所聞正教,即如其教不增不減教授於他,名教教授。 云何證教授?謂如自己獨處空閑所得、所觸、所證諸法,為欲令他得、觸、證故,方便教授,名證教授。 復有諸相圓滿教授。其事云何?謂由三種神變教授。三神變者,一、神境神變,二、記說神變,三、教誡神變。由神境神變,能現種種神通境界,令他於己生極尊重;由彼於己生尊重故,於屬耳聽瑜伽作意,極生恭敬。由記說神變,能尋求他心行差別。由教誡神變,如根、如行、如所悟入為說正法,於所修行能正教誡。故三神變能攝諸相圓滿教授。 本地分中聲聞地第十三第二瑜伽處之三 云何為學?謂三勝學。一、增上戒學,二、增上心學,三、增上慧學。云何增上戒學?謂安住具戒等,如前廣說。是名增上戒學。云何增上心學?謂離欲惡不善法,有尋、有伺,離生喜樂,入初靜慮具足安住,乃至能入第四靜慮具足安住,是名增上心學。又諸無色,及餘所有等持、等至,亦皆名為增上心學。然依靜慮,能最初入聖諦現觀,正性離生,非全遠離一切靜慮能成此事。是故靜慮最為殊勝,故偏說為增上心學。云何增上慧學?謂於四聖諦等所有如實智見。是名增上慧學。 問:何緣唯有三學,非少非多? 答:建立定義故,智所依義故,辨所作義故。建立定義者,謂增上戒學。所以者何?由戒建立心一境性,能令其心觸三摩地。智所依義者,謂增上心學。所以者何?由正定心念一境性,於所知事有如實智、如實見轉。辨所作義者,謂增上慧學。所以者何?由善清淨若智、若見,能證究竟諸煩惱斷。以煩惱斷是自義利,是勝所作,過此更無勝所作故。由是因緣,唯有三學。 問:何緣三學如是次第? 答:先於尸羅善清淨故,便無憂悔;無憂悔故,歡喜安樂;由有樂故,心得正定;心得定故,能如實知、能如實見;如實知見,故能起厭;厭故離染;由離染故,便得解脫;得解脫故,證無所作究竟涅槃。如是最初修習淨戒,漸次進趣,後證無作究竟涅槃。是故三學如是次第。 問:何緣三學名為增上戒、心、慧耶? 答:所趣義故,最勝義故,名為增上。 云何所趣義?謂為趣增上心而修淨戒,名增上戒學。為趣增上慧而修定心,名增上心學。為趣煩惱斷而修智見,名增上慧學。如是名為所趣義故,名為增上。 云何最勝義?謂若增上戒學、若增上心學、若增上慧學,唯於聖教獨有此三,不共外道。如是名為最勝義故,名為增上。 又或有增上心學能引發增上慧學,或有增上慧學能引發增上心學。謂聖弟子未得根本靜慮,先學見跡,後為進斷修道所斷一切煩惱,正勤加行,修念覺支,乃至修捨覺支,是名增上慧學引發增上心學。增上心學引發增上慧學者,如前已說。 又或有增上戒學,無增上心、無增上慧;或有增上戒學,亦有增上心,唯無增上慧;非有增上慧學,而無增上戒及無增上心。是故若有增上慧學,當知必定具足三學。於此建立三種學中,諸瑜伽師當勤修學。 復有三種補特伽羅,依此三學入諦現觀。何等為三?一、未離欲,二、倍離欲,三、已離欲。當知此中,於一切欲全未離者,勤修加行,入諦現觀;既於諸諦得現觀已,證預流果。倍離欲者,當於爾時證一來果。 已離欲者,當於爾時證不還果。 復有三根。一、未知欲知根,二、已知根,三、具知根。云何建立如是三根?謂於諸諦未現觀者,加行勤修諸諦現觀,依此建立未知欲知根。若於諸諦已得現觀,而居有學,依此建立已知根。若阿羅漢所作已辦,住無學位,依此建立具知根。 復有三解脫門。一、空解脫門,二、無願解脫門,三、無相解脫門。云何建立三解脫門?謂所知境略有二種。有及非有。有有二種。一者、有為,二者、無為。於有為中,且說三界所繫五蘊;於無為中,且說涅槃。如是二種有為、無為,合說名有。若說於我,或說有情、命者、生者等,是名非有。於有為中見過失故、見過患故,無所祈願;無祈願故,依此建立無願解脫門。於有為中無祈願故,便於涅槃深生祈願,見極寂靜、見甚微妙、見永出離;由於中見永出離故,依此建立無相解脫門。於其非有無所有中,非有祈願、非無祈願;如其非有,還則如是知為非有、見為非有,依此建立空解脫門。是名建立三解脫門。 云何隨順學法?謂有十種違逆學法,對治彼故,應知十種隨順學法。 云何十種違逆學法?一者、所有母邑少年、盛壯、可愛形色,是正修學善男子等上品障礙。二者、於薩迦耶所攝諸行生起愛著。三者、嬾墮懈怠。四者、薩迦耶見。五者、依於段食貪著美味。六者、於諸世聞種種戲論非一眾多別別品類所思念中,發欲貪愛。七者、思惟諸法瑜伽作意所有過患。此復云何?謂十一種。一、於諸諦寶蘊業果中猶預疑惑。二、樂修斷者,身諸麁重。三、有慢緩者,於修止觀過患作意,惛沈睡眠映蔽其心,令心極略。四、太猛精進者,身疲心惱。五、太劣精進者,不得勝進,善品衰退。六、於少利養名譽稱讚隨一樂中,深生欣喜。七、掉舉不靜踊躍躁擾。八、於薩迦耶永滅涅槃而生驚恐。九、於諸言說非量加行,言論太過;雖說法論,而好折伏,起諍方便。十、於先所見、所聞、所受非一眾多別別品類諸境界中,心馳心散。十一、不應思處而強沈思。應知是名思惟諸法瑜伽作意所有過患。八者、於諸靜慮、等至樂中深生愛味。九者、樂欲證入無相定者,於諸行中隨順流散。十者、觸身苦受乃至奪命苦受時,貪愛壽命,希望存活;隨此希望,傷歎迷悶。是名十種違逆學法。 云何對治如是十種違逆學法隨順學法?謂有十種。一、不淨想,二、無常想,三、無常苦想,四、苦無我想,五、厭逆食想,六、一切世間不可樂想,七、光明想,八、離欲想,九、滅想,十、死想。如是十想,善修、善習、善多修習,能斷十種障礙學法、違逆學法。當知此中有四光明。一、法光明,二、義光明,三、奢摩他光明,四、毘鉢舍那光明。依此四種光明增上立光明想。今此義中,意取能斷思惟諸法瑜伽作意障礙法者。 當知此中,復有十種隨順學法。何等為十?一者、宿因,二者、隨順教,三者、如理加行,四者、無間殷重所作,五者、猛利樂欲,六者、持瑜伽力,七者、止息身心麁重,八者、數數觀察,九者、無有怯弱,十者、離增上慢。 云何宿因?謂先所習諸根成熟、諸根積集。 云何隨順教?謂所說教無倒、漸次。 云何如理加行?謂如其教無倒修行,如是修行能生正見。 云何無間、殷重所作?謂由如是正加行故,於諸善品不虛捨命,速能積習所有善品。 云何猛利樂欲?謂如有一,於上解脫發生希慕。謂我何時當於是處能具足住,如諸聖者於是處所具足而住。 云何持瑜伽力?謂二因緣能令獲得持瑜伽力。一者、本性是利根故;二者、長時串修習故。 云何止息身心麁重?謂如有一,或由身勞身乏,發身麁重,發心麁重;此因易脫威儀而便止息。或由太尋太伺,發身麁重、發心麁重;此因內心寂止方便而便止息。或由心略心劣,惛沈睡眠之所纏遶、發身麁重、發心麁重;此因增上慧法毘鉢舍那順淨作意而便止息。或由本性煩惱未斷,有煩惱品身心麁重未能捨離;此因相續勤修正道而便止息。 云何數數觀察?謂依尸羅,數數觀察惡作不作,數數觀察善作而作。於其惡作不作不轉;於其善作不作不退。於其惡作作而棄捨,於其善作作而不捨。又於煩惱斷與未斷觀察作意增上力故,數數觀察。若知已斷,便生歡喜;若知未斷,則便數數勤修正道。 云何無有怯弱?謂於後時應知、應見、應證得中,未知、未見、未證得故,發生怯弱,其心勞倦、其心匱損,彼既生已而不堅執,速能斷滅。 云何離增上慢?謂於所得、所觸、所證,無增上慢,離顛倒執。於真所得起於得想,於真所觸起於觸想,於真所證起於證想。如是十法,於樂修學諸瑜伽師所應修學,初中後時恒常隨順,無有違逆,是故名為隨順學法。 云何瑜伽壞?謂壞瑜伽略有四種。何等為四?一者、畢竟瑜伽壞,二者、暫時瑜伽壞,三者、退失所得瑜伽壞,四者、邪行所作瑜伽壞。 畢竟瑜伽壞者,謂無種姓補持伽羅。何以故?由彼身中無能趣向涅槃法故,畢竟失壞出世瑜伽。 暫時瑜伽壞者,謂有種姓補特伽羅。何以故?由彼身中有能趣向涅槃法故,雖闕外緣,時經久遠,定當緣會;修習瑜伽,令其現起;善修習已,當般涅槃。是故說彼所有瑜伽暫時失壞。 退失所得瑜伽壞者,謂如有一,退失所得、所觸、所證,若智、若見、若安樂住。 邪行所作瑜伽壞者,謂如有一,不如正理精勤修行,雖多用功,無所成辦,不能成辦一切瑜伽,亦非善法。又如有一,多諸煩惱,性多塵穢,而識聰銳,覺慧猛利,成俱生覺,善攝所聞;於聞究竟,或少或多。或住空閑,有在家者及出家者,為性質直,來至其所,因為說法,令心歡喜。又行矯詐,妄現種種身語相應調善所作。由是因緣,招集利養恭敬稱頌、大福德想,及得種種衣、食、臥具、病緣醫藥資身什物,為諸國王、大臣、居士乃至商主恭敬尊重,咸共謂之是阿羅漢。或於隨彼迴轉弟子,若諸出家、若在家眾,戀著親愛,隨順而轉。為多招引,復生是念:此諸出家在家弟子,信順於我,咸共謂我是阿羅漢。彼若依於瑜伽作意止觀等處來請問我,我得彼問或不能對,彼因是事,當於我所捨信向心,不復謂我是阿羅漢,由斯退失利養恭敬。我於今者,應自思惟、籌量、觀察,安立瑜伽。彼由是事增上力故,耽著利養恭敬名譽,獨處空閑,自諦思惟、籌量、觀察,安立瑜伽。然此瑜伽,不順契經、不現戒律、違逆法性。若諸比丘善持三藏,彼於其所覆自瑜伽,不欲開示。若諸在家、出家弟子,於此瑜伽私竊教示,不令彰顯。所以者何?恐有善持三藏教者,聞彼如是瑜伽處已,以經撿驗,不順契經;以律顯照,不現戒律;以法觀察,違逆法性。由是因緣,便不信受,以不信言詰難於我,諍競舉發。由是國王、大臣、居士乃至饒財長者、商主,不復恭敬尊重於我,更不獲得衣、食、臥具、病緣醫藥資身什物。彼由貪著利養恭敬增上力故,於非法中起於法想、起覆藏想、起惡欲樂,顯發開示非法為法。諸有忍許彼所見者,亦於非法起是法想,愚昧頑鈍。於非法中起法想故,雖如其教精進修行,當知一切皆是邪行。如是名為邪行所作瑜伽失壞,像似正法,非真正法,能障正法。諸有比丘勤修靜慮,是瑜伽師,於此四種瑜伽壞法,應正遍知,當遠捨離。 云何瑜伽?謂四瑜伽。何等為四?一、信,二、欲,三、精進,四、方便。 當知其信有二行相及二依處。二行相者,一、信順行相,二、清淨行相。二依處者,一、觀察諸法道理依處,二、信解補特伽羅神力依處。 欲有四種。何等為四?一、為證得欲,二、為請問欲,三、為修集資糧欲,四、為隨順瑜伽欲。為證得欲者,謂如有一,於上解脫發生希慕,如前廣說。為請問欲者,謂如有一,生希慕已,往僧伽藍,詣諸有識同修梵行成就瑜伽妙智者所,為聽未聞,為聞究竟。為修集資糧欲者,謂如有一,為戒律儀清淨、為根律儀清淨故,於食知量、減省睡眠、正知住中,展轉增勝,發生希慕。為隨順瑜伽欲者,謂於無間加行、殷重加行修習道中,發生希慕、發生欣樂,欲有所作。 精進有四。何等為四?一、為聞精進,二、為思精進,三、為修精進,四、為障淨精進。為聞精進者,謂為聽未聞,聞已究竟,勤心勇猛審決加行。為思精進者,謂如所聞法,獨處空閑,思惟其義,籌量、觀察。為修精進者,謂入寂靜,於時時間勤修止觀。為障淨精進者,謂於晝夜策勵精勤經行、宴坐,從諸障法淨修其心,勤心勇猛,審決精進。 方便有四。謂尸羅律儀增上力故,善守其念;善守念故,能無放逸,防護其心,修諸善法;無放逸故,心正於內修奢摩他、增上慧法毘鉢舍那。 此四瑜伽有十六種。 當知此中,初由信故,於應得義深生信解;信應得已,於諸善法生起樂欲;由樂欲故,晝夜策勵,安住精勤、堅固、勇猛;發精進已,攝受方便,能得未得、能觸未觸、能證未證,故此四法說名瑜伽。 云何作意?謂四作意。何等為四?一、力勵運轉作意,二、有間運轉作意,三、無間運轉作意,四、無功用運轉作意。 云何力勵運轉作意?謂初修業者,令心於內安住等住,或於諸法無倒簡擇,乃至未得所修作意,爾時作意力勵運轉。由倍勵力折挫其心,令住一境,故名力勵運轉作意。 云何有間運轉作意?謂得所修作意已後,世出世道漸次勝進了相作意,由三摩地思所間雜,未能一向純修行轉,故名有間運轉作意。 云何無間運轉作意?謂從了相作意已後,乃至加行究竟作意,是名無間運轉作意。 云何無功用運轉作意?謂加行究竟果作意,是名無功用運轉作意。 復有所餘四種作意。一、隨順作意,二、對治作意,三、順清淨作意,四、順觀察作意。 云何隨順作意?謂於所緣深生厭壞,起正加行,而未斷惑。 云何對治作意?謂能斷惑。 云何順清淨作意?謂心下蹙,取淨妙相策令歡悅。 云何順觀察作意?謂觀察作意。由此作意增上力故,順觀煩惱斷與未斷。 問:於所緣境正作意時,思惟幾相? 答:四。何等為四?一、所緣相,二、因緣相,三、應遠離相,四、應修習相。所緣相者,謂所知事同分影像明了顯現。因緣相者,謂三摩地資糧積集,隨順教導,與修俱行猛利樂欲,於可厭法深生厭患,能審遍知亂與不亂,他不惱觸。或人所作,或非人作,或音聲作,或功用作。若毘鉢舍那而為上首,內略其心,極猛盛觀後因緣相。若奢摩他而為上首,發起勝觀,極猛盛止後因緣相。應遠離相復有四種。一者、沈相,二者、掉相,三者、著相,四者、亂相。沈相者,謂由所緣相、因緣相故,令心下劣。掉相者,謂由所緣相、因緣相故,令心高舉。著相者,謂由所緣相、因緣相故,令心於境起染、起著,作諸惱亂。亂相者,謂由所緣相、因緣相故,令心於外馳散擾動。如是諸相,如前等引地中已說。 問:如是作意於所緣境起勝解時,有幾勝解? 答:九。何等為九?一、有光淨勝解,二、無光淨勝解,三、遲鈍勝解,四、捷利勝解,五、狹小勝解,六、廣大勝解,七、無量勝解,八、清淨勝解,九、不清淨勝解。 有光淨勝解者,謂於光明相澄心善取,與光明俱所有勝解。 無光淨勝解者,謂於光明相不能善取,與闇昧俱所有勝解。 遲鈍勝解者,謂鈍根身中所有勝解。 捷利勝解者,謂利根身中所有勝解。 狹小勝解者,謂狹小信欲俱行勝解,及狹小所緣意解勝解。如是作意狹小故,及所緣狹小故,名狹小勝解。 廣大勝解者,謂廣大信欲俱行勝解,及廣大所緣意解勝解。如是作意廣大故,及所緣廣大故,名廣大勝解。 無量勝解者,謂無邊無際信欲俱行勝解,及無邊無際所緣意解勝解。如是作意無量故,及所緣無量故,名無量勝解。 清淨勝解者,謂已善修、已成滿、已究竟俱行勝解。 不清淨勝解者,謂未善修、未成滿、未究竟俱行勝解。 問:修瑜伽者凡有幾種瑜伽所作? 答:四。何等為四?一、所依滅,二、所依轉,三、遍知所緣,四、愛樂所緣。 所依滅及所依轉者,謂勤修習瑜伽作意故,所有麁重俱行所依漸次而滅,所有輕安俱行所依漸次而轉,是名所依滅及所依轉瑜伽所作。 遍知所緣及愛樂所緣者,謂或有遍知所緣、愛樂所緣與所依滅轉而為上首;由此遍知所緣、愛樂所緣增上力故,令所依滅及所依轉。或有遍知所緣、愛樂所緣用所依清淨而為上首;由此所依清淨增上力故,令遍知所緣得善清淨,及愛樂所緣得善清淨,於其所作成辦時轉。是名四種修瑜伽者瑜伽所作。 問:修瑜伽師凡有幾種? 答:三。何等為三?一、初修業瑜伽師,二、已習行瑜伽師,三、已度作意瑜伽師。 云何初修業瑜伽師?謂有二種初修業者。一、於作意初修業者,二、淨煩惱初修業者。 云何於作意初修業者?謂初修業補特伽羅,安住一緣,勤修作意,乃至未得所修作意,未能觸證心一境性。 云何淨煩惱初修業者?謂已證得所修作意,於諸煩惱欲淨其心,發起攝受正勤修習了相作意,名淨煩惱初修業者。 云何已習行瑜伽師?謂除了相作意,於餘乃至加行究竟五作意中已善修習。 云何已度作意瑜伽師?謂住加行究竟果作意位中,由此超過加行方便所修作意,安住修果,是故說名已度作意。 又始從修習善法欲已去,乃至未起順決擇分善根,於爾所時,名初修業。若已起順決擇分善根,所謂煖、頂、隨順諦忍、世第一法,名已習行。若已證入正性離生,得諦現觀,不由他緣,於佛聖教不為餘緣之所引奪。當於爾時,名度作意。由彼超過他緣作意,住非他緣所有作意,是故名為已度作意。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

接所緣前二(遍滿·淨行),本子說所緣後二——善巧所緣(蘊界處緣起處非處五善巧,治愚)與淨惑所緣(世間道觀麁靜·出世間道觀四諦,斷惑)——四種所緣至此說竟;再順走第二瑜伽處的修學六科:教授·學·隨順學法·瑜伽壞·瑜伽·作意。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

一、善巧所緣(治愚·五善巧)

什麼是善巧所緣?略有五種:一、蘊善巧,二、界善巧,三、處善巧,四、緣起善巧,五、處非處善巧。

(一)蘊善巧。什麼是蘊?什麼是蘊善巧?蘊有五種:色蘊、受蘊、想蘊、行蘊、識蘊。

什麼是色蘊?所有一切色法,都是四大種(地、水、火、風)以及四大種所造的色。這一切色又分為過去、未來、現在,內、外,麁、細,劣、勝,遠、近。把這一切總合起來,名為色蘊。

什麼是受蘊?就是以順樂受之觸為緣所生的受、以順苦受之觸為緣所生的受,以及以順不苦不樂受之觸為緣所生的受。又有六種受身:眼觸所生受、耳觸所生受、鼻觸所生受、舌觸所生受、身觸所生受、意觸所生受。把這一切總合起來,名為受蘊。

什麼是想蘊?就是有相想、無相想、狹小想、廣大想、無量想,以及無諸所有的無所有處想。又有六種想身:眼觸所生想、耳觸所生想、鼻觸所生想、舌觸所生想、身觸所生想、意觸所生想。把這一切總合起來,名為想蘊。

什麼是行蘊?就是六種思身:眼觸所生思、耳觸所生思、鼻觸所生思、舌觸所生思、身觸所生思、意觸所生思。此外,還包括除受與想以外的其餘各種心法。把這一切總合起來,名為行蘊。

什麼是識蘊?就是心、意、識,又包括六種識身:眼識、耳識、鼻識、舌識、身識、意識。把這一切總合起來,名為識蘊。前面所說的受蘊、想蘊、行蘊,以及這裡的識蘊,也都像色蘊一樣,各有過去、未來、現在,內、外,麁、細,劣、勝,遠、近等差別。以上就名為五蘊。

什麼是蘊善巧?就是善能了知上述諸蘊的種種差別性、並非單一而有眾多品類的性質;同時了知,除了這些蘊法以外,更沒有別的所得,也沒有別的所分別。這是略說蘊善巧的意義。

什麼叫作蘊的種種差別性?就是色蘊不同於受蘊,受蘊不同於想蘊,想蘊不同於行蘊,行蘊不同於識蘊;乃至識蘊也各有自己的差別。這就名為種種差別性。

什麼叫作蘊的非一眾多性?例如色蘊並非單一,而有眾多品類:四大種與四大種所造各有差別,過去、未來、現在等品類也各有差別。這就名為色蘊的非一眾多性。其餘受、想、行、識四蘊,也應依各自相應的差別而如實了知。

什麼叫作除這些法以外更無所得、無所分別?就是只有蘊可得、只有事可得;離開五蘊之外,並沒有一個「我」可以得到,也沒有一個常恒安住而永不變易的法可以得到,更沒有任何少分之法可以說是「我所有」。因此,除五蘊以外,更無所得,也無所分別。

(二)界善巧。什麼是界?什麼是界善巧?界有十八種:眼界、色界、眼識界,耳界、聲界、耳識界,鼻界、香界、鼻識界,舌界、味界、舌識界,身界、觸界、身識界,意界、法界、意識界。這些就名為十八界。若能對這十八種法如實了知、如實認可並審察:它們各從不同的界、不同的種子、不同的種姓而生起出現,便名為界善巧。如實了知十八種法各從不同的界而運轉,就是對它們的因緣得到善巧,所以名為界善巧。

(三)處善巧。什麼是處?什麼是處善巧?處有十二種:眼處、色處、耳處、聲處、鼻處、香處、舌處、味處、身處、觸處、意處、法處。這些就名為十二處。

什麼是處善巧?以眼識為例:眼處作增上緣,色處作所緣緣,前一念剛滅的意作等無間緣,由這三緣生起眼識及其相應法。以耳識為例:耳處作增上緣,聲處作所緣緣,前一念剛滅的意作等無間緣,由這三緣生起耳識及其相應法。其餘鼻識、舌識、身識也同樣各依三緣而生。到了意識,意作等無間緣,當下生起的作意作增上緣,法處作所緣緣,由這三緣生起意識及其相應法。如此,六識身及其相應法都由三緣而流轉,也就是增上緣、所緣緣、等無間緣。若能對這些內處、外處所作的緣得到善巧,便名為處善巧。

(四)緣起善巧。什麼是緣起?什麼是緣起善巧?緣起是:無明為緣而有行,行為緣而有識,識為緣而有名色,名色為緣而有六處,六處為緣而有觸,觸為緣而有受,受為緣而有愛,愛為緣而有取,取為緣而有有,有為緣而有生,生為緣而有老死,乃至由此招集成整個純大苦蘊。這就名為緣起。

什麼是緣起善巧?就是了知只有諸法滋潤諸法、只有諸法同等滋潤諸法、只有諸行引發諸行,並沒有離法之外的作者。那些諸行由因而生、由緣而生,原本沒有而後來生起,生起以後又散壞滅去,所以它們的體性無常。因為無常,它們就是會生的法、會老的法、會病的法、會死的法,也是會有愁、憔悴、悲、嘆、憂、苦、惱的法。因為它們是會生乃至會惱的法,所以名為苦;因為是苦,便不得自在,力量羸弱。由這個道理,可以確定其中沒有一個主宰的我。若能對這些緣生法,以如此種種行相善巧了達,生起無常智、苦智或無我智,這就名為緣起善巧。

(五)處非處善巧。當知處非處善巧,就是緣起善巧中的一種差別。它的差別在於:由處非處善巧,能正確了知因果道理並不是不平等、沒有規律的;善法與不善法各有自己的異熟果。各種善法能感得可愛的異熟果,各種不善法能感得不可愛的異熟果。若能如此如實了知,便名為處非處善巧。

這五善巧略則為二:自相善巧(由蘊善巧顯)與共相善巧(由餘四善巧顯)。如是總名善巧所緣。

二、淨惑所緣(斷惑·世間道+出世間道)

什麼是淨惑所緣?就是觀「下地麁性、上地靜性」——如欲界對初靜慮,乃至無所有處對非想非非想處。

什麼是麁性?麁性有二種:一、體麁性,二、數麁性。

什麼是體麁性?以欲界對照初靜慮來說,雖然兩地都具足五蘊,但欲界中的過患深重,苦惱的住處增上,是最鄙劣、最可厭惡的,所以說欲界具有體麁性。初靜慮卻不是如此;初靜慮極為寂靜、極為微妙,所以說它具有體靜性。

什麼是數麁性?欲界色蘊有許多不同品類,都應當了知、應當斷除;受蘊、想蘊、行蘊乃至識蘊也同樣有許多應知應斷的品類,所以說欲界具有數麁性。像這樣,各個上地展轉與下地相比,無論是體麁性還是數麁性,都應當依其相應情形了知。從欲界逐層比較到無所有處,一切下地都是苦惱增多、壽量減少,一切上地都是苦惱減少、壽量增多;非想非非想處只有寂靜、只有微妙,因為再沒有更高的地勝過它。

簡要說來,「有過患」就是麁性的意思。某一地的過患較多,便由過患增多而名為麁性;某一地的過患較少,便由過患減少而名為靜性。這是世間行者依世俗道而修的淨惑所緣。為什麼?因為他把下地的許多過患觀為疾病、毒瘡、毒箭,觀見它沒有安隱的性質,所以把下地觀為麁;又把上地觀為與此相反,所以觀為靜。由此斷除下地所有煩惱,從欲界開始,逐層直到最上的無所有處。但這只是暫時斷除,不是究竟斷除,因為以後那些煩惱還會相續生起。

出世間道淨惑所緣有四種:一、苦聖諦,二、集聖諦,三、滅聖諦,四、道聖諦。

什麼是苦聖諦?就是生苦、老苦、病苦、死苦、怨憎會苦、愛別離苦、求不得苦;簡要總說,就是一切五取蘊苦。這名為苦聖諦。

什麼是集聖諦?就是愛、後有愛、與喜貪共同運行的愛,以及對彼彼境界生起喜樂的愛等。這名為集聖諦。

什麼是滅聖諦?就是上述愛等煩惱無餘斷除、無餘止滅。這名為滅聖諦。

什麼是道聖諦?就是八支聖道等正道。這名為道聖諦。

應知四聖諦是依黑品、白品各自的果與因而建立:苦諦是黑品的果,集諦是黑品的因;滅諦是白品的果,道諦是白品的因,因為道能令行者得到並證得滅。又可譬喻說:苦諦如病,最初應當遍知;集諦如病的因緣,其次應當遠離;滅諦如沒有疾病,其次應當親自觸證;道諦如良藥,又應當修習並多加修習。

又從苦諦的苦義直到道諦的道義,都是如實如此,並非不如實;都是沒有顛倒,並非顛倒,所以名為「諦」。它們各自的相沒有虛妄欺誑;如實見到它們時,便有不顛倒的覺慧運轉。因此名為諦。

問:為什麼這些諦只名為「聖諦」?答:只有諸聖者一致認定這些諦確實是諦,並且能如實了知、如實觀見;一切愚夫都不能如實了知、如實觀見,所以這些諦只名為聖諦。又對愚夫來說,只因法爾如此而說它們是諦,並不是由於愚夫已經覺悟;對諸聖者來說,則同時具足法爾如此與親自覺悟二種理由。

又,所謂生苦,是說有情出生時會發生種種身體與心理的苦受;並不是「生」的自體就是苦,而是因為生能作苦受的因緣,所以名為生苦。從老苦、病苦、死苦、怨憎會苦、愛別離苦一直到求不得苦,也都應作同樣理解。例如求不得苦,是由所求不能得到這個因緣,發生種種身心苦受;並不是「求不得」的自體就是苦,而是它能作苦受的因緣,所以名為苦。

應知簡要總說的一切五取蘊苦,是以生苦等不同門徑顯明「苦苦」;而由五取蘊苦,也顯明其餘的「壞苦」與「行苦」。為什麼?五取蘊具足攝受苦受、樂受、不苦不樂受三種受,所以既能作前述苦苦的容器,其中也具足前面還沒有明說的壞苦與行苦。

問:為什麼世尊只把「苦苦」用它自己的名稱直接說出,而把壞苦、行苦改用其他門徑來說?答:因為對苦苦,不論凡夫或聖者,一切人都同樣會生起覺知是苦的智慧;苦苦的性質又極可厭患;從來沒有修習智慧的人,一聽到苦苦也很容易明白;而且直接說苦苦,能使在四諦中可以調伏、可以教化的有情容易趣入。因此世尊直接說苦苦。

怎樣建立三種苦性

第一,建立苦苦性。前面所說的生苦直到求不得苦,顯示的就是苦受以及苦受所依的身心處所,這些名為苦苦性。與這些苦相對、能治這些苦的法是:年少是衰老所對治的法,無病是疾病所對治的法,生命是死亡所對治的法,與親愛者相聚是怨憎會所對治的法,不與不可愛者別離是愛別離所對治的法,所求如願成就是求不得所對治的法。

第二,建立壞苦性。苦受及其所依處所生起的煩惱,無病等隨順樂受的處所、那些處所所生的樂受,以及由它們所生起的煩惱,總合起來都說為壞苦性。這裡的樂受及其所依處,由於無常而發生變化、成為異樣時,有情便受領由它們增上所生的眾苦。各種煩惱在任何地方生起時,也會纏縛其心、令心變壞,當下生出眾苦,所以名為壞苦。正如世尊所說:「心進入變壞,便執持女人之手。」又如經中說:住在貪欲纏中,便領受以貪欲纏為緣所生的身心憂苦;住在瞋恚、惛沈睡眠、掉舉惡作、疑等纏中,也各自領受以那些纏為緣所生的身心憂苦。由這些至教,可以在煩惱中見到苦義,也見到變壞義,所以說煩惱屬於壞苦性。這就名為建立壞苦性。

第三,建立行苦性。行苦遍行在一切五取蘊中。簡要說來,除去苦苦性,除去煩惱所攝的壞苦性,也除去樂受及其所依處所攝的壞苦性,其餘一切與不苦不樂受共同運行的諸蘊——無論是由那種受所生的蘊、能生那種受之緣所攝的蘊,或作為那種受生起與安住容器的諸蘊——都名為行苦性。因為這些蘊的性質無常,與生滅相應,帶有一切取著,被三受的麁重所隨逐;它們不安隱,不能脫離苦苦與壞苦,也不能自在運轉。由於具有行苦,所以說它們是苦。這就名為建立行苦性。

又,前面所說的,也名希求,也名欣欲,也名喜樂。這種希求由三門運轉:一是希求後有,二、三是希求境界中的兩種。希求後有,名為後有愛。希求境界又有二種:對已經得到的境界,有與喜著共同運行的愛,這名喜貪俱行愛;對尚未得到的境界,有希求與它和合的愛,這名彼彼喜樂愛。

滅有二種:一、煩惱滅,二、所依滅。道有二種:一、有學道,二、無學道。以上就名為出世間道的淨惑所緣。

如此已說四種所緣:一遍滿、二淨行、三善巧、四淨惑。〔所緣一目竟。〕

三、教授(四教授+諸相圓滿教授)

什麼是教授?教授有四種:一、無倒教授,二、漸次教授,三、教教授,四、證教授。

什麼是無倒教授?就是不顛倒地宣說正法與法義,使學人受持、讀誦、修學,因而如實出離,正確窮盡眾苦,做到苦的邊際。這就名為無倒教授。

什麼是漸次教授?就是配合時機與根器宣說法義:先使學人受持、讀誦淺近的法,然後才使他學習深遠之處。又為使他最初進入聖諦現觀,先教苦諦,然後教集、滅、道諦;為使他得到靜慮等至,先教最初靜慮等至,然後再教其餘靜慮等至。這些同類的次第教法,都名為漸次教授。

什麼是教教授?就是從尊重者、與尊重者相似而通達瑜伽的軌範師或親教師、諸如來,或佛弟子處聽聞正教,再完全依照所聞之教,不增加也不減少地教授他人。這就名為教教授。

什麼是證教授?就是把自己獨處空閑時所得、所觸、所證的諸法,為了使他人也能得到、觸及、證得,而以方便善巧教授他人。這就名為證教授。

另外還有諸相圓滿教授。它是怎樣圓滿的?就是由三種神變教授:一、神境神變,二、記說神變,三、教誡神變。由神境神變,能顯現種種神通境界,使他人對自己生起極大尊重;他既生尊重,對正在傾聽的瑜伽作意便極生恭敬。由記說神變,能尋求並了知他人心行的差別。由教誡神變,能依學人的根、行與所悟入處為他宣說正法,對他的修行作正確教誡。因此,三種神變能攝受一切相狀圓滿的教授。

〔本地分中聲聞地第十三第二瑜伽處之三〕

四、學(三勝學)

什麼是學?三勝學:一增上戒學、二增上心學、三增上慧學。  增上戒學=安住具戒等(如前廣說)。  增上心學=離欲惡不善法,有尋有伺、離生喜樂,入初靜慮乃至第四靜慮具足安住;諸無色及其餘等持等至也都名增上心學。然而依靜慮才能最初入聖諦現觀、得正性離生(不是全離靜慮能成此事),故靜慮最殊勝,偏說為增上心學。  增上慧學=於四聖諦等的如實智見。

問:何緣唯有三學,不少不多?答:由「建立定」義(增上戒——戒立心一境性,令心觸三摩地)、「智所依」義(增上心——正定令於所知事有如實智見轉)、「辨所作」義(增上慧——清淨智見能證究竟煩惱斷,斷惑是自義利、勝所作,過此更無),故唯三學。

問:何緣三學如是次第?答:先清淨尸羅便無憂悔,無憂悔故歡喜安樂,由樂故心得正定,定故能如實知見,如實知見故能起厭,厭故離染,離染故得解脫,解脫故證無作究竟涅槃。故三學如是次第。

問:何緣名「增上」戒心慧?答:由「所趣義」與「最勝義」。所趣義=為趣增上心而修淨戒(名增上戒學)、為趣增上慧而修定心(名增上心學)、為趣煩惱斷而修智見(名增上慧學)。最勝義=這三學唯聖教獨有、不共外道。

又或有增上心學引發增上慧學、或有增上慧學引發增上心學(如聖弟子未得根本靜慮,先學見跡,後為斷修道煩惱而修念覺支乃至捨覺支,即慧引發心)。又:有增上戒學而無增上心慧者、有增上戒心而無慧者,卻沒有「有增上慧而無戒無心」者——故若有增上慧學,必定具足三學。瑜伽師應於此三學勤修。

又有三種補特伽羅依三學入諦現觀:未離欲、倍離欲、已離欲——全未離欲者勤修入諦現觀,得現觀已證預流果;倍離欲者證一來果;已離欲者證不還果。

又有三根:未知欲知根(於諸諦未現觀而加行勤修者)、已知根(於諸諦已現觀而居有學者)、具知根(阿羅漢所作已辦、住無學位者)。

又有三解脫門:空、無願、無相。所知境略有二——「有」與「非有」;有又分有為(三界五蘊)、無為(涅槃),合說名「有」;若說我、有情、命者、生者等即是「非有」。於有為見過失過患故無所祈願,依此立無願解脫門;無祈願故便於涅槃深生祈願(見極寂靜、甚微妙、永出離),依此立無相解脫門;於非有中非有祈願非無祈願,如其非有知為非有、見為非有,依此立空解脫門

五、隨順學法(十違逆·十隨順·十想·四光明)

什麼是隨順學法?有十種違逆學法,對治它們故有十種隨順學法。

十種違逆學法:一、母邑(女色)少年盛壯可愛形色(正修學者的上品障礙);二、於薩迦耶諸行生愛著;三、嬾墮懈怠;四、薩迦耶見;五、依段食貪著美味;六、於世間種種戲論所思念中發欲貪愛;七、思惟諸法瑜伽作意的種種過患——這又有十一種:(1)於諦寶蘊業果猶豫疑惑、(2)樂修斷者身諸麁重、(3)慢緩者於修止觀過患作意被惛沈睡眠映蔽令心極略、(4)太猛精進者身疲心惱、(5)太劣精進者不得勝進善品衰退、(6)於少利養名譽稱讚隨一樂中深生欣喜、(7)掉舉不靜踊躍躁擾、(8)於薩迦耶永滅涅槃而生驚恐、(9)於諸言說作非量加行、言論太過、好折伏起諍、(10)於先所見聞受種種境界心馳心散、(11)不應思處而強沈思;八、於諸靜慮等至樂中深生愛味;九、樂欲證入無相定者於諸行中隨順流散;十、觸身苦受乃至奪命苦受時貪愛壽命希望存活、隨此傷歎迷悶。這名十種違逆學法。

對治這十種的十想:一不淨想、二無常想、三無常苦想、四苦無我想、五厭逆食想、六一切世間不可樂想、七光明想、八離欲想、九滅想、十死想。善修這十想能斷十種障礙違逆學法。其中「光明想」依四光明而立:法光明、義光明、奢摩他光明、毘鉢舍那光明(今此義中,意取能斷「思惟諸法瑜伽作意障礙」者)。

又有十種隨順學法。哪十種?一、宿因,二、隨順教,三、如理加行,四、無間殷重所作,五、猛利樂欲,六、持瑜伽力,七、止息身心麁重,八、數數觀察,九、無有怯弱,十、離增上慢。

什麼是宿因?就是先前所修習的各根已經成熟,諸根所需資糧已經積集。

什麼是隨順教?就是所宣說的教法沒有顛倒,而且次第井然。

什麼是如理加行?就是完全依照所受教法,沒有顛倒地修行;如此修行能生起正見。

什麼是無間殷重所作?就是由正確加行的緣故,對各種善品不讓生命空過而白白捨棄,並能迅速積習所有善法。

什麼是猛利樂欲?就是有人對上等解脫生起強烈希慕,心想:「我什麼時候才能像諸聖者一樣,在那解脫處具足安住?」

什麼是持瑜伽力?有二種因緣能使行者獲得維持瑜伽的力量:一、本性是利根,二、長時不斷串習修行。

什麼是止息身心麁重?有人因身體勞累疲乏而生身麁重與心麁重,這可藉由容易舒展的威儀使它止息;有人因尋思、伺察過多而生身心麁重,這可藉由使內心寂止的方便止息;有人因心收縮低劣,被惛沈睡眠纏繞而生身心麁重,這可藉由依增上慧法修毗鉢舍那、作隨順清淨的作意而止息;有人因本性煩惱尚未斷除,仍有煩惱品的身心麁重不能捨離,這可藉由相續不斷地勤修正道而止息。

什麼是數數觀察?就是依止尸羅,一再觀察不應作的惡行而不作,一再觀察應作的善行而去作;對尚未作的惡行不使它發生,對尚未作的善行不令自己退轉,對已作的惡行加以棄捨,對已作的善行不加捨棄。又由觀察煩惱已斷、未斷的作意增上力,一再觀察:若知道煩惱已斷,便生歡喜;若知道還未斷,便一再勤修正道。

什麼是無有怯弱?行者對以後應當了知、應當見到、應當證得的法,因為現在尚未知、未見、未證,可能生起怯弱,使心勞倦、使心匱乏;這怯弱生起以後,他不牢牢執持,能迅速斷滅。

什麼是離增上慢?就是對自己所得、所觸、所證之法,沒有未得謂得的增上慢,遠離顛倒執著;只對真正所得之法生所得想,對真正所觸之法生所觸想,對真正所證之法生所證想。

以上十法,是喜愛修學的瑜伽師所應修學的法;它們在修學的初時、中時、後時都恒常隨順,沒有違逆,所以名為隨順學法。

六、瑜伽壞(四種)

什麼是瑜伽壞?略有四種:畢竟、暫時、退失所得、邪行所作。  畢竟瑜伽壞=無種姓補特伽羅——身中無能趣涅槃之法,畢竟失壞出世瑜伽。  暫時瑜伽壞=有種姓補特伽羅——身中有能趣涅槃之法,雖闕外緣、久經時日,終定緣會、修習瑜伽令現起,善修已當般涅槃,故說其瑜伽暫時失壞。  退失所得瑜伽壞=退失已得已觸已證的智、見、安樂住。  邪行所作瑜伽壞=不如正理精勤修行,雖多用功,仍無所成辦,不能成辦一切瑜伽,也不是善法。又有一種人:煩惱眾多、本性多有塵穢,卻識性聰銳、覺慧猛利,成就俱生覺,善能攝持所聞;無論所聞少或多,都能在聽聞上達到究竟。他或住在空閑處,有本性質直的在家人與出家人來到他那裡,他便為他們說法,使其心歡喜;又行矯詐,妄現種種身語相應的調善所作。因此招集利養、恭敬、稱頌,被人作大福德想,又得到種種衣服、飲食、臥具、病緣醫藥及資身什物;國王、大臣、居士乃至饒財長者、商主都恭敬尊重他,咸謂他是阿羅漢。他又對隨他迴轉的出家或在家弟子戀著親愛,為了招引更多人,便想:「這些出家、在家弟子信順於我,咸謂我是阿羅漢。若他們依瑜伽作意、止觀等處來請問我,我得到他們的問題卻不能回答,他們便會捨棄對我的信向,不再謂我是阿羅漢;由此我會失去利養恭敬。所以我現在應當自己思惟、籌量、觀察,安立瑜伽。」他受這件事的增上力所驅,耽著利養恭敬名譽,獨處空閑,自己如實思惟、籌量、觀察,安立瑜伽。然而這套瑜伽「不順契經、不現戒律、違逆法性」。對於善持三藏的比丘,他覆藏自己的瑜伽,不肯開示;對在家、出家弟子,則私下竊自教示,不令彰顯。為什麼?他恐怕善持三藏教法的人聽到這瑜伽處後,以經檢驗,發現它不順契經;以律顯照,發現它不現戒律;以法觀察,發現它違逆法性。由此他們便不信受,以不信之語詰難他、與他諍競並舉發他;國王、大臣、居士乃至饒財長者、商主便不再恭敬尊重他,他也不再得到衣服、飲食、臥具、病緣醫藥及資身什物。他由貪著利養恭敬的增上力,於非法中起法想、起覆藏想、起惡欲樂,把非法顯發開示為法;容忍、認可他所見的人,也於非法起法想,愚昧頑鈍,雖依他的教法精進修行,應知一切都是邪行。這名邪行所作瑜伽失壞——「像似正法、非真正法、能障正法」。修靜慮的瑜伽師對這四種瑜伽壞應正遍知、當遠捨離。

七、瑜伽(四瑜伽:信欲精進方便)

什麼是瑜伽?瑜伽有四種。哪四種?一、信,二、欲,三、精進,四、方便。

應知有二種行相與二種依處。二種行相是:一、信順行相,二、清淨行相。二種依處是:一、觀察諸法道理的依處,二、信解補特伽羅神力的依處。

有四種。哪四種?一、為證得欲,二、為請問欲,三、為修集資糧欲,四、為隨順瑜伽欲。為證得欲,是對上等解脫生起希慕,如前面所詳說。為請問欲,是有人生起希慕以後,前往僧伽藍,拜訪有識、同修梵行而成就瑜伽妙智的人,為了聽聞未曾聽聞的法,也為了把已聞之法聽到究竟。為修集資糧欲,是有人為使戒律儀清淨、根律儀清淨,並在飲食知量、減少睡眠、正知而住等法上展轉增勝,因而生起希慕。為隨順瑜伽欲,是在以無間加行、殷重加行修道時,生起希慕、欣樂與想要有所作為的願欲。

精進有四種。哪四種?一、為聞精進,二、為思精進,三、為修精進,四、為障淨精進。為聞精進,是為了聽未曾聽聞的法、使已聞之法達到究竟,而以勤奮勇猛之心作審決加行。為思精進,是依自己所聞之法,獨處空閑,思惟其義,籌量、觀察。為修精進,是進入寂靜處,在不同時段勤修止觀。為障淨精進,是晝夜策勵精勤地經行、宴坐,從各種障礙法中淨修其心,以勤奮勇猛之心審決精進。

方便有四種相續次第:由尸羅律儀的增上力而善守其念;由善守其念而能不放逸,防護其心,修習諸善法;由不放逸而使心正確地向內修奢摩他,也修增上慧法的毗鉢舍那。由此分成四種方便。

以上四類瑜伽各有四種,合成十六種。應知最初由信,對應當證得之義深生信解;既信解那應得之義,便對各種善法生起樂欲;由有樂欲,便日夜策勵,安住於精勤、堅固、勇猛;發起精進以後,再攝受種種方便,於是能得到未得、觸及未觸、證得未證。因此,這四種法說名為瑜伽。

八、作意(四作意+餘四+四相+九勝解+四所作+三瑜伽師)

什麼是作意?四作意:力勵運轉、有間運轉、無間運轉、無功用運轉。  力勵運轉作意=初修業者令心於內安住等住、或於諸法無倒簡擇,乃至未得所修作意時,倍勵其力折挫其心令住一境。  有間運轉作意=已得所修作意後,世出世道漸次勝進的了相作意,因被三摩地之「思」間雜、未能一向純修。  無間運轉作意=從了相作意已後,乃至加行究竟作意。  無功用運轉作意=加行究竟果作意。

又有餘四種作意:隨順作意(於所緣深生厭壞、起正加行而未斷惑)、對治作意(能斷惑)、順清淨作意(心下蹙時取淨妙相策令歡悅)、順觀察作意(觀察煩惱斷與未斷)。

問:於所緣境正作意時思惟幾相?答:四相——所緣相(所知事同分影像明了顯現)、因緣相(三摩地資糧積集、隨順教導、與修俱行猛利樂欲、於可厭法深生厭患、能審遍知亂與不亂、令他不惱觸(擾亂之相或人所作、或非人作、或音聲作、或功用作);若毗鉢舍那為上首則內略其心極猛盛觀之後因緣相,若奢摩他為上首則發起勝觀極猛盛止之後因緣相)、應遠離相(四種:沈相令心下劣、掉相令心高舉、著相令心於境起染著惱亂、亂相令心於外馳散擾動,如等引地已說)、應修習相。

問:作意於所緣起勝解時有幾勝解?答:九——有光淨勝解(於光明相澄心善取、與光明俱)、無光淨勝解(不能善取、與闇昧俱)、遲鈍勝解(鈍根身中)、捷利勝解(利根身中)、狹小勝解(狹小信欲及狹小所緣)、廣大勝解(廣大信欲及廣大所緣)、無量勝解(無邊信欲及無邊所緣)、清淨勝解(已善修成滿究竟俱行)、不清淨勝解(未善修成滿究竟俱行)。

問:修瑜伽者有幾種瑜伽所作?答:四——所依滅、所依轉、遍知所緣、愛樂所緣。所依滅及所依轉=勤修瑜伽作意故,麁重俱行所依漸滅、輕安俱行所依漸轉。遍知所緣及愛樂所緣=或以所依滅轉為上首(由遍知愛樂所緣增上令所依滅轉),或以所依清淨為上首(由所依清淨增上令遍知愛樂所緣得善清淨、於所作成辦時轉)。

問:修瑜伽師有幾種?答:三——初修業瑜伽師、已習行瑜伽師、已度作意瑜伽師。  初修業瑜伽師有二:於作意初修業者(安住一緣勤修作意,未得所修作意、未觸心一境性)、淨煩惱初修業者(已證所修作意,於諸煩惱欲淨其心,發起、攝受並正勤修習了相作意)。  已習行瑜伽師=除了相作意,於其餘乃至加行究竟的五作意中已善修習。  已度作意瑜伽師=住加行究竟果作意位、超過加行方便所修作意、安住修果。  又:從修習善法欲起、乃至未起順決擇分善根,名初修業;已起順決擇分善根(煖、頂、隨順諦忍、世第一法)名已習行;已證入正性離生、得諦現觀、不由他緣、於佛聖教不為餘緣引奪,名已度作意(超過他緣作意、住非他緣作意)。

Continuing from the first two of the four objects (the pervasive object and the purifying-of-conduct object), this unit sets out the latter two objects — the skillfulness objects (the five skillfulnesses: in the aggregates, the elements, the sense-fields, dependent origination, and the possible-and-impossible; these cure delusion) and the affliction-purifying objects (by the mundane path, contemplating the coarse and the calm; by the supramundane path, contemplating the four truths; these sever the afflictions). With this, the four kinds of object are stated in full. Then it goes on, in order, to the six rubrics of the training within the Second Yoga-Station: instruction · the training · dharmas that accord with the training · the ruin of yoga · yoga · attention. The technical terms are left as they stand; every phrase is rendered into today's language, with no doctrinal addition, no citation of treatises, and no annotation of Sanskrit; where the treatise-text is compressed, it is filled back out within 〔…〕.

One · The Skillfulness Objects (Curing Delusion · the Five Skillfulnesses)

What are the skillfulness objects? In brief there are five kinds: first, skill in the aggregates; second, skill in the elements; third, skill in the sense-fields; fourth, skill in dependent origination; fifth, skill in the possible-and-impossible.

(1) Skill in the aggregates. What are the aggregates, and what is skill in the aggregates? There are five aggregates: the form aggregate, feeling aggregate, perception aggregate, formations aggregate, and consciousness aggregate.

What is the form aggregate? All form whatsoever consists of the four great elements—earth, water, fire, and wind—and form derived from those four great elements. All such form is further distinguished as past, future, or present; inner or outer; coarse or fine; inferior or superior; far or near. Taken together, all of it is named the form aggregate.

What is the feeling aggregate? It includes feelings that arise with contact conducive to pleasure as their condition, feelings that arise with contact conducive to pain as their condition, and feelings that arise with contact conducive to neither pain nor pleasure as their condition. It also includes the six bodies of feeling: feeling born of eye-contact, ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact. Taken together, all of these are named the feeling aggregate.

What is the perception aggregate? It includes perception with marks, perception without marks, small perception, vast perception, measureless perception, and the perception of the sphere of nothing-whatever, in which nothing at all is perceived as present. It also includes the six bodies of perception: perception born of eye-contact, ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact. Taken together, all of these are named the perception aggregate.

What is the formations aggregate? It includes the six bodies of volition: volition born of eye-contact, ear-contact, nose-contact, tongue-contact, body-contact, and mind-contact. It also includes all the remaining mental factors apart from feeling and perception. Taken together, all of these are named the formations aggregate.

What is the consciousness aggregate? It is mind, mentation, and consciousness, and it also includes the six bodies of consciousness: eye-, ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mental consciousness. Taken together, all of these are named the consciousness aggregate. The feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness aggregates all have, as does form, the distinctions of past, future, and present; inner and outer; coarse and fine; inferior and superior; far and near. These are what is named the five aggregates.

What is skill in the aggregates? It is to know well the manifold differences among the aggregates, to know that each aggregate is not a single thing but has many classes, and to know that apart from these aggregate-dharmas nothing further can be found or discriminated. This is the meaning of skill in the aggregates stated in brief.

What is their manifold differentiation? The form aggregate is distinct from the feeling aggregate, feeling from perception, perception from formations, and formations from consciousness; each of the five is distinct. This is named manifold differentiation.

What is their character of not being one but many? The form aggregate, for example, is not a single thing but has many classes: the great elements differ from the forms derived from them, and the classes of past, future, present, and so forth also differ. This is the form aggregate's not being one but many. The remaining four aggregates should be understood in the same way, each according to its corresponding distinctions.

What does it mean that apart from these dharmas nothing further can be found or discriminated? Only the aggregates can be found, and only bare events can be found. Apart from the aggregates, no self can be found; no permanent, enduring, unchanging dharma can be found; and not even the least dharma can be found that is truly "mine." Therefore, apart from the aggregates, nothing further can be found or discriminated.

(2) Skill in the elements. What are the elements, and what is skill in the elements? There are eighteen elements: the eye-, form-, and eye-consciousness-elements; the ear-, sound-, and ear-consciousness-elements; the nose-, smell-, and nose-consciousness-elements; the tongue-, taste-, and tongue-consciousness-elements; the body-, tangible-, and body-consciousness-elements; and the mind-, dharma-, and mental-consciousness-elements. These are named the eighteen elements. If one knows as it truly is, accepts, and carefully examines that each of these eighteen dharmas arises and appears from its own distinct element, seed, and lineage, this is named skill in the elements. To know as it truly is that the eighteen dharmas each turn from a distinct element is to become skillful regarding their causes and conditions. Hence it is named skill in the elements.

(3) Skill in the sense-fields. What are the sense-fields, and what is skill in the sense-fields? There are twelve sense-fields: the eye- and form-fields; ear- and sound-fields; nose- and smell-fields; tongue- and taste-fields; body- and tangible-fields; mind- and dharma-fields. These are named the twelve sense-fields.

What is skill in the sense-fields? For eye-consciousness, the eye serves as dominant condition, form as object-condition, and the just-ceased mentation as immediately antecedent condition; these three give rise to eye-consciousness and its associated dharmas. For ear-consciousness, the ear serves as dominant condition, sound as object-condition, and the just-ceased mentation as immediately antecedent condition; these three give rise to ear-consciousness and its associated dharmas. Nose-, tongue-, and body-consciousness arise in the corresponding way. For mental consciousness, mentation serves as immediately antecedent condition, the attention arising now as dominant condition, and dharmas as object-condition; these give rise to mental consciousness and its associated dharmas. Thus the six bodies of consciousness and their associated dharmas all flow through three conditions: dominant condition, object-condition, and immediately antecedent condition. One who becomes skillful regarding the conditions furnished by these inner and outer sense-fields is named skillful in the sense-fields.

(4) Skill in dependent origination. What is dependent origination, and what is skill in dependent origination? Dependent origination is this: ignorance conditions formations; formations condition consciousness; consciousness conditions name-and-form; name-and-form conditions the six sense-fields; the six sense-fields condition contact; contact conditions feeling; feeling conditions craving; craving conditions grasping; grasping conditions becoming; becoming conditions birth; and birth conditions aging and death, thereby amassing this entire great mass of suffering. This is named dependent origination.

What is skill in dependent origination? It is to know that only dharmas moisten dharmas, only dharmas evenly moisten dharmas, and only formations draw forth formations; no agent stands apart from them. Those formations are born from causes and conditions. Originally absent, they come to be; having come to be, they scatter and cease. Their nature is therefore impermanent. Because they are impermanent, they are dharmas subject to birth, aging, sickness, and death, and to sorrow, wasting away, grief, lamentation, distress, pain, and vexation. Because they are subject to birth through vexation, they are suffering. Because they are suffering, they are not under mastery and their power is weak. For this reason, it is certain that there is no self in them. To comprehend these dependently arisen dharmas skillfully in such modes, through knowledge of impermanence, suffering, or no-self, is named skill in dependent origination.

(5) Skill in the possible and impossible. This should be known as a particular differentiation of skill in dependent origination. Through it one rightly understands that the principle of cause and effect is not irregular or uneven: wholesome and unwholesome dharmas each have their distinct maturation. Wholesome dharmas can produce agreeable results of maturation, while unwholesome dharmas can produce disagreeable results. To know this as it truly is is named skill in the possible and impossible.

These five skillfulnesses, in brief, come to two: skill in the particular character (shown by skill in the aggregates) and skill in the common character (shown by the remaining four skillfulnesses). Thus, all together, these are named the skillfulness objects.

Two · The Affliction-Purifying Objects (Severing the Afflictions · the Mundane Path and the Supramundane Path)

What are the affliction-purifying objects? They are the contemplation of "the coarseness of the lower ground and the calmness of the upper ground" — as with the desire-realm set against the first meditative absorption, on up to the sphere of nothing-whatever set against the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.

What is coarseness? Coarseness is of two kinds: first, coarseness of substance; second, coarseness of number.

What is coarseness of substance? Compared with the first absorption, the desire realm has the five aggregates just as the first absorption does, but its faults and troubles are deep and heavy, painful dwelling predominates there, and it is exceedingly inferior and repellent. Therefore, the desire realm is said to be coarse in substance. The first absorption is not like this: it is exceedingly calm and sublime, and so it is said to be calm in substance.

What is coarseness of number? The form aggregate in the desire realm has many distinct classes that must be known and severed. The feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness aggregates likewise have many such classes. Therefore, the desire realm is said to be coarse in number. As each higher ground is compared in turn with the ground below it, both coarseness of substance and coarseness of number should be understood according to what is appropriate. From the desire realm through the sphere of nothing-whatever, every lower ground has more suffering and a shorter lifespan, while every higher ground has less suffering and a longer lifespan. The sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception is only calm and sublime, because no higher ground surpasses it.

In brief, having faults and troubles is the meaning of coarseness. A ground with more faults is named coarse precisely because its faults are more numerous; a ground with fewer faults is named calm precisely because its faults are fewer. This is the affliction-purifying object of the mundane conventional path. Why? The practitioner contemplates the many faults of a lower ground as a disease, a boil, or a poisoned arrow, seeing it as insecure, and therefore regards it as coarse. He contemplates the higher ground as the opposite and therefore regards it as calm. In this way he severs the afflictions of each lower ground in turn, from the desire realm through the sphere of nothing-whatever. Yet this severance is only temporary, not ultimate, because the afflictions will later resume their continuity.

The affliction-purifying object of the supramundane path is of four kinds: first, the noble truth of suffering; second, the noble truth of origination; third, the noble truth of cessation; fourth, the noble truth of the path.

What is the noble truth of suffering? It is the suffering of birth, aging, sickness, death, union with what is hated, separation from what is loved, and not obtaining what one seeks. Stated briefly, it is all the suffering of the five appropriated aggregates. This is named the noble truth of suffering.

What is the noble truth of origination? It is craving, craving for further becoming, craving accompanied by delight and greed, and craving that delights in this or that object. This is named the noble truth of origination.

What is the noble truth of cessation? It is the severance and cessation without remainder of that craving and the other afflictions. This is named the noble truth of cessation.

What is the noble truth of the path? It is the noble path with eight limbs and the other factors of the path. This is named the noble truth of the path.

The four truths are established through the causes and results of the dark and bright classes. Suffering is the result of the dark class, and origination its cause. Cessation is the result of the bright class, and the path its cause, because the path enables one to attain and realize cessation. Suffering is like a disease and must first be fully known. Origination is like the cause of disease and must next be abandoned. Cessation is like freedom from disease and must next be personally realized. The path is like good medicine and must be cultivated repeatedly.

Moreover, the suffering meant by the truth of suffering through the path meant by the truth of the path are just so and real, not otherwise than real; they are undistorted, not distorted. Thus they are called truths. Their own characteristics contain no falsity or deception, and on seeing them an undistorted cognition arises. For this reason they are named truths.

Question: Why are these truths named specifically "noble" truths? Answer: Only noble ones agree that these truths are indeed truths and know and see them as they truly are. Ordinary, childish beings neither know nor see them as they truly are. Therefore these truths are named specifically noble truths. For ordinary beings they are called truths only because their nature is so, not because those beings have awakened to them. For noble ones, both reasons apply: their nature is so, and the noble ones have awakened to them.

Again, the suffering of birth means the various painful bodily and mental feelings that arise at the time of birth. It is not that birth's own substance is itself suffering; birth is called suffering because it is a cause and condition for painful feelings. Aging, sickness, death, union with what is hated, separation from what is loved, and not obtaining what one seeks should be understood in the same way. In the last case, failure to obtain what is sought causes various painful bodily and mental feelings. It is not that failure itself is intrinsically suffering; it is called suffering because it serves as a condition for suffering.

The brief expression "all suffering of the five appropriated aggregates" should be understood as follows. Birth and the other headings directly reveal only the suffering that is suffering. The suffering of the five appropriated aggregates also reveals the other two, the suffering of change and the suffering of conditioned formations. Why? The five appropriated aggregates include all three kinds of feeling. They are therefore a vessel for the suffering already described and also contain the not-yet-explicit suffering of change and suffering of conditioned formations.

Question: Why did the World-Honored One state the suffering that is suffering directly by its own name, while stating the suffering of change and the suffering of conditioned formations through other headings? Answer: Ordinary and noble beings alike immediately recognize the suffering that is suffering as painful. Its nature is also intensely repellent. A person who has not previously trained in wisdom can understand it as soon as it is explained, and direct explanation of it allows beings capable of being tamed and taught to enter the truths more easily. Therefore it is stated directly.

How are the three characteristics of suffering established?

First, the suffering that is suffering. The suffering of birth through the suffering of not obtaining what one seeks reveals painful feeling and the bodily or mental basis on which it depends. Their opposites are the conditions that counteract them: youth counters aging, health counters sickness, life counters death, union with loved ones counters union with the hated, non-separation from the loved counters separation from the loved, and successful fulfillment of one's aim counters not obtaining what one seeks. This establishes the suffering that is suffering.

Second, the suffering of change. The afflictions arising from painful feeling and its basis, together with healthy and other states conducive to pleasant feeling, the pleasant feelings they produce, and the afflictions arising from those states and feelings, are collectively called the suffering of change. Because pleasant feeling and its basis are impermanent, when they change or become otherwise, one undergoes the many sufferings produced under the dominant force of that change. When afflictions arise anywhere, they bind the mind, damage it, and immediately produce suffering. Thus they are called the suffering of change. As the World-Honored One said, "Entering a changed mind, he grasps a woman's hand." Likewise, one who abides in the entanglement of sensual desire experiences bodily and mental grief and pain produced with that entanglement as condition. The same is true of the entanglements of ill will, dullness and drowsiness, restlessness and remorse, and doubt. These authoritative teachings reveal both suffering and change within affliction. Therefore afflictions are included in the suffering of change. This is the establishment of the suffering of change.

Third, the suffering of conditioned formations. This suffering pervades all five appropriated aggregates. In brief, after excluding the suffering that is suffering, the suffering of change included in affliction, and the suffering of change included in pleasant feeling and its basis, all remaining aggregates that accompany neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling are named the suffering of conditioned formations. This includes aggregates produced by that feeling, aggregates serving as conditions for its production, and aggregates that serve as the vessel in which it arises and abides. These aggregates are impermanent and associated with arising and ceasing; they bear every form of appropriation, are followed by the coarseness and heaviness of all three feelings, are insecure, cannot escape either the suffering that is suffering or the suffering of change, and do not operate under mastery. Because they are subject to the suffering of conditioned formations, they are called suffering. This establishes the suffering of conditioned formations.

The craving mentioned above is also called longing, eager desire, and delight. This longing operates through three gates: longing for future becoming, and two kinds of longing for objects. Longing for future becoming is named craving for further becoming. Longing for objects has two forms. With regard to an object already obtained, craving accompanies delight and attachment; this is craving accompanied by delight and greed. With regard to an object not yet obtained, craving longs for union with it; this is craving that delights in this or that object.

Cessation is of two kinds: first, cessation of the afflictions; second, cessation of the basis. The path is of two kinds: first, the path of the learner; second, the path of the non-learner. This is named the affliction-purifying object of the supramundane path.

Thus have been stated the four kinds of object: first, the pervasive object; second, the purifying-of-conduct object; third, the skillfulness object; fourth, the affliction-purifying object. 〔The rubric of "the object" is now complete.〕

Three · Instruction (the Four Instructions and the Instruction of Perfect Marks)

What is instruction? Instruction is of four kinds: first, unmistaken instruction; second, gradual instruction; third, instruction by teaching; fourth, instruction by realization.

What is unmistaken instruction? It is to explain the Dharma and its meaning without distortion, causing students to receive and retain it, recite it, and train in it so that they truly emerge, rightly exhaust all suffering, and reach suffering's end. This is named unmistaken instruction.

What is gradual instruction? It is to teach the Dharma and its meaning in accord with the time and the students' capacities: first causing them to receive and recite what is shallow and accessible, and only afterward causing them to train in what is deep and far-reaching. To lead them into the first direct realization of the truths, one first teaches suffering and then origination, cessation, and the path. To lead them into meditative absorption and equipoise, one first teaches the first absorption and then the remaining attainments. Instructions of these kinds are named gradual instruction.

What is instruction by teaching? It is to hear the true teaching from a venerable teacher; from one resembling a venerable teacher, such as a preceptor or ordaining teacher versed in yoga; from the Tathāgatas; or from disciples of the Buddha—and then to teach others exactly what was heard, adding nothing and taking nothing away. This is named instruction by teaching.

What is instruction by realization? It is to use skillful means to teach others the dharmas one has personally attained, touched, and realized while dwelling alone in seclusion, so that they too may attain, touch, and realize them. This is named instruction by realization.

There is also instruction complete in every feature. How is it complete? Through instruction by three miracles: the miracle of spiritual power, the miracle of declaration, and the miracle of admonition. Through the miracle of spiritual power, one manifests various extraordinary fields, causing others to feel profound reverence; because they revere the instructor, they listen to the yoga-attention with great respect. Through the miracle of declaration, one discerns the differences in another person's mental conduct. Through the miracle of admonition, one teaches the true Dharma according to the person's faculties, conduct, and point of entry, and gives correct guidance regarding the practice. Thus the three miracles encompass instruction complete in every feature.

〔Within the Basic Section, the Śrāvaka Stage, the thirteenth, the third [portion] of the Second Yoga-Station — 本地分中聲聞地第十三第二瑜伽處之三〕

Four · The Training (the Three Higher Trainings)

What is the training? There are three higher trainings: first, the higher training in discipline; second, the higher training in mind; third, the higher training in wisdom.  The higher training in discipline = dwelling in the possession of the precepts, and so forth (as explained at length before).  The higher training in mind = separated from desires and from evil, unwholesome dharmas, with applied and sustained thought, with the joy-and-pleasure born of seclusion, entering the first meditative absorption and dwelling in its full attainment, on up to being able to enter the fourth meditative absorption and dwell in its full attainment; the formless [attainments] and all the remaining concentrations and equipoises are also all named the higher training in mind. Yet it is in dependence on the meditative absorptions that one can first enter the direct realization of the noble truths and attain the assurance of the right course (this cannot be accomplished by wholly forsaking all the meditative absorptions) — therefore the meditative absorptions are the most excellent, and so [this training] is stated by preference as the higher training in mind.  The higher training in wisdom = the knowledge-and-vision, as they truly are, of the four noble truths and the like.

Question: Why are there only three trainings, neither fewer nor more? Answer: By reason of the sense of "establishing concentration" (the higher discipline — discipline establishes one-pointedness of mind, causing the mind to touch meditative absorption), the sense of "the basis for knowledge" (the higher mind — right concentration causes true knowledge-and-vision to operate with regard to what is to be known), and the sense of "carrying out what is to be done" (the higher wisdom — pure knowledge-and-vision can realize the ultimate severing of the afflictions; severing the afflictions is one's own aim-and-benefit, is the excellent thing to be done, and beyond this there is no further excellent thing to be done) — therefore there are only three trainings.

Question: Why do the three trainings follow this sequence? Answer: First, discipline being purified, there is then no worry-or-remorse; there being no worry-or-remorse, there is gladness-and-ease; by reason of ease, the mind attains right concentration; the mind being concentrated, one can know-and-see as it truly is; knowing-and-seeing truly, one can give rise to disenchantment; being disenchanted, one is freed from defilement; being free from defilement, one attains liberation; being liberated, one realizes the actionless, ultimate nirvāṇa. Therefore the three trainings follow this sequence.

Question: Why are they named the "higher" discipline, mind, and wisdom? Answer: By reason of "the sense of what it tends toward" and "the sense of being most excellent." The sense of what it tends toward = in order to tend toward the higher mind one cultivates pure discipline (named the higher training in discipline); in order to tend toward the higher wisdom one cultivates the concentrated mind (named the higher training in mind); in order to tend toward the severing of the afflictions one cultivates knowledge-and-vision (named the higher training in wisdom). The sense of being most excellent = these three trainings exist solely within the noble teaching, not in common with the outsiders.

Again, there may be a higher training in mind that draws forth the higher training in wisdom, or a higher training in wisdom that draws forth the higher training in mind (as when a noble disciple who has not yet attained the fundamental meditative absorption first trains in seeing-the-traces, and afterward, in order to sever the afflictions to be severed by the path of cultivation, cultivates the awakening-factor of mindfulness on up to the awakening-factor of equanimity — this is wisdom drawing forth mind). Again: there may be a higher training in discipline without the higher training in mind or wisdom; there may be the higher training in discipline and in mind without wisdom; but there is no "higher training in wisdom without discipline and without mind" — therefore, if there is a higher training in wisdom, it necessarily possesses all three trainings. The yoga practitioner should diligently cultivate these three trainings.

There are also three [types of] person who, in dependence on the three trainings, enter the direct realization of the truths: one not yet separated from desire, one twice-separated from desire, and one already separated from desire — one wholly not-yet-separated from desire, diligently cultivating, enters the direct realization of the truths, and having attained the direct realization, realizes the fruit of stream-entry; one twice-separated from desire realizes the fruit of once-returning; one already separated from desire realizes the fruit of non-returning.

There are also three faculties: the faculty of "wishing-to-know-the-not-yet-known" (one who, not having directly realized the truths, applies himself with diligent cultivation), the faculty of "already-knowing" (one who, having directly realized the truths, still dwells as a learner), and the faculty of "one-who-fully-knows" (the arhat, who has done what was to be done and dwells in the non-learner's station).

There are also three gates of liberation: emptiness, wishlessness, and marklessness. The objects to be known are, in brief, of two kinds — "the existent" and "the non-existent." The existent is further divided into the conditioned (the five aggregates of the three realms) and the unconditioned (nirvāṇa), which, spoken of together, are named "the existent"; whereas if one speaks of a self, a sentient being, a life-holder, a being-that-is-born, and the like, that is "the non-existent." Because one sees the faults and troubles within the conditioned, one has nothing to pray-for; and because one has nothing to pray-for, on this basis is established the gate of liberation of wishlessness; because one has nothing to pray-for [within the conditioned], one then gives rise to a deep prayer for nirvāṇa (seeing it as utterly calm, most sublime, forever emerged-and-released), and on this basis is established the gate of liberation of marklessness; and with regard to the non-existent one neither prays-for nor does-not-pray-for — knowing the non-existent for the non-existent just as it is non-existent, seeing it as non-existent — and on this basis is established the gate of liberation of emptiness.

Five · Dharmas That Accord with the Training (the Ten Contraries · the Ten Concordances · the Ten Perceptions · the Four Illuminations)

What are the dharmas that accord with the training? There are ten kinds of dharma contrary to the training; because they counteract these, there are ten kinds of dharma that accord with the training.

The ten kinds of dharma contrary to the training: first, the lovely form of a woman, young, in the flush of vigor (a superior-grade obstacle to the good man and the rest who are rightly training); second, giving rise to clinging-attachment toward the formations included in the false-view-of-self; third, laziness and slackness; fourth, the false view of self; fifth, clinging-attachment to fine tastes in dependence on morsel-food; sixth, giving rise to desire-craving amid the various worldly idle-proliferations one thinks upon; seventh, the faults and troubles [that arise from] reflecting upon the yoga-attention of the various dharmas — this in turn is of eleven kinds: (1) wavering doubt with regard to the truths, the Jewels, the aggregates, and karma-and-fruit; (2) for one who delights in cultivating severance, the coarse-and-heavy states of the body; (3) for one who is lax and slack, being over-shadowed by dullness-and-drowsiness in the attention to the faults-and-troubles of cultivating tranquillity-and-insight, so that the mind becomes utterly shrunk; (4) for one whose vigor is too fierce, the body wearied and the mind vexed; (5) for one whose vigor is too weak, not attaining excellent advancement, and the wholesome qualities declining; (6) with regard to some small gain, fame, or praise — some one pleasure — giving rise to deep delight; (7) restlessness, the un-calm, leaping-and-agitated turmoil; (8) giving rise to alarm-and-terror at the everlasting-cessation-nirvāṇa of the false-view-of-self; (9) with regard to speech, making immoderate exertion, talking to excess, fond of overpowering [others] and stirring up the means of dispute; (10) with regard to the manifold objects previously seen, heard, and received, the mind galloping, the mind scattering; (11) forcibly sinking into thought where one ought not to think; eighth, giving rise to deep relish-and-clinging amid the pleasure of the meditative absorptions and equipoises; ninth, for one who wishes to realize-and-enter the markless concentration, drifting-and-scattering in accordance with the formations; tenth, when one touches bodily painful feelings on up to the life-robbing painful feeling, craving-and-cherishing one's lifespan and hoping to stay alive, and, following upon this hoping, grieving-lamenting and being confused-and-distressed. These are named the ten kinds of dharma contrary to the training.

The ten perceptions that counteract these ten: first, the perception of the impure; second, the perception of impermanence; third, the perception of impermanence-and-suffering; fourth, the perception of suffering-and-no-self; fifth, the perception of loathing-food; sixth, the perception that the whole world is not to be delighted in; seventh, the perception of light; eighth, the perception of dispassion; ninth, the perception of cessation; tenth, the perception of death. Cultivating these ten perceptions well can sever the ten obstacles, the dharmas contrary to the training. Among them, "the perception of light" is established in dependence on the four illuminations: the illumination of the dharma, the illumination of the meaning, the illumination of tranquillity, and the illumination of insight (in the present sense, the intent is to take up that which can sever "the obstacle of the yoga-attention that reflects upon the various dharmas").

There are also ten kinds of dharma that accord with the training. What are the ten? First, a past cause; second, an accordant teaching; third, application in accord with principle; fourth, what is done uninterruptedly and earnestly; fifth, fierce eager desire; sixth, the power to sustain yoga; seventh, stilling the coarseness and heaviness of body and mind; eighth, repeated examination; ninth, freedom from timidity; tenth, freedom from overweening pride.

What is a past cause? It is that faculties cultivated in the past have matured and the necessary capacities have accumulated.

What is an accordant teaching? It is a teaching that is undistorted and presented in proper sequence.

What is application in accord with principle? It is to practice without distortion exactly as instructed. Such practice gives rise to right view.

What is what is done uninterruptedly and earnestly? Through correct application, one does not let one's life pass vainly without cultivating wholesome qualities, and one rapidly accumulates all such qualities.

What is fierce eager desire? One develops a powerful longing for higher liberation, thinking, "When shall I be able to abide fully in that state, as noble ones abide fully there?"

What is the power to sustain yoga? Two causes enable one to obtain this power: being of sharp faculties by nature and having cultivated continuously for a long time.

What is stilling the coarseness and heaviness of body and mind? When physical weariness produces bodily and mental heaviness, a more relaxed posture stills it. When excessive applied and sustained thought produces bodily and mental heaviness, the means of inwardly calming the mind stills it. When a constricted, weakened mind is entangled in dullness and drowsiness and produces bodily and mental heaviness, a purifying attention based on insight into the higher-wisdom Dharma stills it. When innate afflictions not yet severed produce an afflictive heaviness of body and mind that cannot yet be relinquished, continuous diligent cultivation of the true path stills it.

What is repeated examination? Depending on discipline, one repeatedly examines the bad deed that should not be done and the good deed that should be done. One prevents an uncommitted bad deed from occurring, does not retreat from a good deed not yet performed, relinquishes a bad deed already done, and does not abandon a good deed already done. Through the force of attention examining whether afflictions have or have not been severed, one also repeatedly examines them: knowing them severed, one rejoices; knowing them not severed, one repeatedly and diligently cultivates the true path.

What is freedom from timidity? Because one has not yet known, seen, or realized what must later be known, seen, and realized, timidity may arise, wearying and depleting the mind. Once it arises, one does not cling to it but quickly severs and extinguishes it.

What is freedom from overweening pride? One has no overweening pride regarding what has been attained, touched, or realized and is free from distorted grasping. One forms the thought "attained" only regarding what has truly been attained, "touched" only regarding what has truly been touched, and "realized" only regarding what has truly been realized.

These ten dharmas should be cultivated by yoga practitioners who delight in training. At the beginning, middle, and end they remain constantly accordant and never contrary. Therefore they are named dharmas that accord with the training.

Six · The Ruin of Yoga (Four Kinds)

What is the ruin of yoga? In brief there are four kinds: the final, the temporary, the loss of what was attained, and what is done by wrong conduct.  Final ruin of yoga = the person without lineage — within whose body there is no dharma able to tend toward nirvāṇa, so that the supramundane yoga is finally lost-and-ruined.  Temporary ruin of yoga = the person with lineage — within whose body there is a dharma able to tend toward nirvāṇa; though the outer conditions be lacking and a long time pass by, in the end the conditions will surely converge, and he will cultivate yoga and make it manifest, and having cultivated it well he shall attain final nirvāṇa — therefore it is said that his yoga is temporarily lost-and-ruined.  Ruin of yoga through the loss of what was attained = losing the knowledge, the vision, and the pleasant dwelling one had attained, touched, and realized.  Ruin of yoga done by wrong conduct = practicing with diligent effort not in accord with right principle, so that though much effort is expended nothing is accomplished: one cannot accomplish any yoga at all, and this is not a wholesome dharma. There is also a certain sort of person: one with many afflictions, of a nature much sullied, yet whose cognition is keen and whose awareness-wisdom is fierce, who possesses inborn awareness and well gathers what he has heard, and who brings his hearing to completion whether it is little or much. He may dwell in a secluded place, where upright householders and renunciants come to him; he teaches them the Dharma and makes their minds glad. He also practices deceit, falsely displaying various tamed-and-good bodily and verbal deeds. Thereby he amasses gain, reverence, and praise, is thought to possess great merit, and obtains various robes, food, bedding, medicines for illness, and bodily requisites. Kings, great ministers, householders, wealthy elders, and merchant-chiefs revere and honor him, all declaring him to be an arhat. Cherishing an intimate affection for the lay and monastic disciples who follow and revolve around him, and wishing to draw in more, he thinks: "These lay and monastic disciples trust and follow me, and all declare me to be an arhat. If they come to question me about yoga-attention, tranquillity, insight, and the like, and, on receiving their question, I cannot answer, they will abandon their faithful inclination toward me and no longer declare me to be an arhat; thereby I shall lose gain and reverence. I should now reflect, weigh, examine, and establish a yoga for myself." Driven by this matter and attached to gain, reverence, and fame, he dwells alone in seclusion and himself carefully reflects, weighs, examines, and establishes a yoga. Yet this yoga "does not accord with the discourses, does not appear in the discipline, and contravenes the nature of dharma." Before monks who hold the three baskets well, he conceals his yoga and is unwilling to reveal it; to his lay and monastic disciples he teaches it privately and secretly, not letting it come to light. Why? He fears that those who hold the three baskets well, on hearing this yoga topic, would test it against the discourses and find that it does not accord with them, illuminate it by the discipline and find that it does not appear there, and examine it by the Dharma and find that it contravenes the nature of dharma. They would therefore not accept it, would challenge him with words of disbelief, dispute with him, and expose him. Kings, great ministers, householders, wealthy elders, and merchant-chiefs would then no longer revere and honor him, and he would no longer obtain robes, food, bedding, medicines for illness, and bodily requisites. Through the predominant force of attachment to gain and reverence, with regard to what is not the Dharma he gives rise to the perception of Dharma, the perception of concealment, and evil desire-and-pleasure, openly revealing and teaching what is not the Dharma as the Dharma. Those who tolerate and approve his view likewise give rise to the perception of Dharma regarding what is not the Dharma and are benighted and dull-witted; though they practice diligently according to his teaching, all of it should be known as wrong conduct. This is named the ruin of yoga done by wrong conduct — "a semblance of the right dharma, not the true right dharma, able to obstruct the right dharma." The yoga practitioner who diligently cultivates the meditative absorptions should rightly and thoroughly know these four kinds of ruin of yoga, and should keep far off from them.

Seven · Yoga (the Four Yogas: Trust, Desire, Vigor, Means)

What is yoga? Yoga is of four kinds. What are the four? First, trust; second, desire; third, vigor; fourth, means.

Trust has two modes and two bases. The two modes are confidence and compliance, and purity. The two bases are examination of the principles of dharmas and confident understanding of a person's spiritual power.

Desire is of four kinds. What are the four? First, desire to attain; second, desire to inquire; third, desire to gather provisions; fourth, desire to accord with yoga. Desire to attain is longing for higher liberation, as explained above. Desire to inquire is this: after longing has arisen, one goes to a monastery and approaches a knowledgeable fellow practitioner who has achieved subtle wisdom in yoga, in order to hear what one has not heard and to bring one's hearing to completion. Desire to gather provisions is the longing to advance in purifying disciplinary restraint and restraint of the faculties, knowing moderation in food, reducing sleep, and dwelling with clear comprehension. Desire to accord with yoga is the longing, delight, and wish to act that arise on the path cultivated through uninterrupted and earnest application.

Vigor is of four kinds. What are the four? First, vigor for hearing; second, vigor for reflection; third, vigor for cultivation; fourth, vigor for purifying obstacles. Vigor for hearing is the diligent, courageous, and decisive application made to hear what has not been heard and to bring what has been heard to completion. Vigor for reflection is to dwell alone in seclusion and reflect on, weigh, and examine the meaning of the Dharma as heard. Vigor for cultivation is to enter quietude and diligently cultivate tranquillity and insight from time to time. Vigor for purifying obstacles is to rouse oneself day and night in walking and seated meditation, cleansing the mind of obstructive dharmas through diligent, courageous, decisive effort.

Means has four successive aspects: through the strengthening power of disciplinary restraint, one guards mindfulness well; through guarding mindfulness well, one becomes heedful, protects the mind, and cultivates wholesome dharmas; through heedfulness, the mind correctly cultivates inward tranquillity and insight into the higher-wisdom Dharma. These form the four aspects of means.

The four classes of yoga contain sixteen kinds in all. First, through trust one develops deep confident understanding of the aim to be attained. Once confident in that aim, one develops eager desire for wholesome dharmas. Through eager desire, one rouses oneself day and night and abides diligent, firm, and courageous. Once vigor has arisen, one embraces the means and can attain what was not attained, touch what was not touched, and realize what was not realized. Therefore these four dharmas are named yoga.

Eight · Attention (the Four Attentions · the Further Four · the Four Aspects · the Nine Resolute Convictions · the Four Tasks · the Three Yoga Practitioners)

What is attention? There are four attentions: attention that operates by forceful exertion, attention that operates with intervals, attention that operates without intervals, and attention that operates effortlessly.  Attention that operates by forceful exertion = the beginner, causing his mind inwardly to abide-in-equipoise and to settle-in-equipoise, or unmistakenly discerning the dharmas, on up to the point where he has not yet attained the attention he is cultivating: at that time, redoubling his strength, he curbs-and-checks his mind and makes it dwell on a single object.  Attention that operates with intervals = after he has attained the attention he is cultivating, the apprehending-the-aspect attention that gradually advances along the mundane and supramundane path, which — being intermixed by the "reflection" of meditative absorption — is not yet able to cultivate single-mindedly and purely.  Attention that operates without intervals = from the apprehending-the-aspect attention onward, up to the culmination-of-effort attention.  Attention that operates effortlessly = the fruit-of-the-culmination-of-effort attention.

There are also the further four kinds of attention: the accordant attention (giving rise to deep disenchantment-and-abhorrence toward the object, rousing right application, but not yet having severed the afflictions); the counteracting attention (able to sever the afflictions); the attention conducive to purity (when the mind is downcast, taking up a pure-and-sublime mark and rousing it to gladness-and-joy); the attention conducive to contemplation (contemplating whether the afflictions are severed or not yet severed).

Question: When one rightly attends to the object, how many aspects does one reflect upon? Answer: Four aspects — the object-aspect (the image, of the same class as the thing to be known, appearing clearly-and-distinctly); the cause-and-condition-aspect (the amassing of the provisions of meditative absorption, the accordant guidance, the fierce eager desire that co-operates with cultivation, the deep disenchantment-and-abhorrence toward what is to be loathed, the ability thoroughly to know whether one is disturbed or undisturbed, and the not being harassed-and-touched by others (the marks of disturbance being either what a person does, or what a non-person does, or what a sound does, or what exertion does); if insight is chief, then after inwardly shrinking his mind and contemplating with utmost fierce vigor comes the cause-and-condition-aspect; if tranquillity is chief, then after rousing excellent insight and stopping with utmost fierce vigor comes the cause-and-condition-aspect); the aspect to be kept far off (of four kinds: the mark of sinking, which makes the mind inferior-and-low; the mark of restlessness, which makes the mind lifted-up-high; the mark of clinging, which makes the mind give rise to defilement-and-clinging toward the object and stir up disturbance; and the mark of distraction, which makes the mind gallop-and-scatter outwardly and be agitated — as already stated in the Stage of Meditative Equipoise); and the aspect to be cultivated.

Question: When attention gives rise to resolute conviction toward the object, how many resolute convictions are there? Answer: Nine — the resolute conviction that is light-and-clear (with regard to the mark of light, clarifying the mind and taking it up well, so as to be together with light); the resolute conviction that is not light-and-clear (unable to take it up well, so as to be together with murk-and-darkness); the dull resolute conviction (in one of dull faculties); the quick-and-keen resolute conviction (in one of sharp faculties); the small resolute conviction (small confidence-and-desire, and a small object); the vast resolute conviction (vast confidence-and-desire, and a vast object); the measureless resolute conviction (boundless confidence-and-desire, and a boundless object); the pure resolute conviction (already well-cultivated, accomplished, and ultimate in its operation); the impure resolute conviction (not yet well-cultivated, accomplished, or ultimate in its operation).

Question: How many kinds of yoga-task does one who cultivates yoga have? Answer: Four — the cessation of the basis, the transformation of the basis, the thorough knowing of the object, and the delighting in the object. The cessation of the basis and the transformation of the basis = because one diligently cultivates the yoga-attention, the basis co-operating with coarse-and-heavy states gradually ceases, and the basis co-operating with pliancy gradually transforms. The thorough knowing of the object and the delighting in the object = either they take the cessation-and-transformation of the basis as chief (whereby the thorough-knowing-and-delighting-in the object, as dominant condition, causes the cessation-and-transformation of the basis), or they take the purity of the basis as chief (whereby the purity of the basis, as dominant condition, causes the thorough-knowing-and-delighting-in the object to attain a good purity, operating at the time when what is to be done is accomplished).

Question: How many kinds of yoga practitioner are there? Answer: Three — the beginner yoga practitioner, the yoga practitioner already in habitual practice, and the yoga practitioner who has passed beyond attention.  The beginner yoga practitioner is of two: the beginner with regard to attention (dwelling on a single object, diligently cultivating attention, but not yet having attained the attention to be cultivated, not yet having touched-and-realized one-pointedness of mind), and the beginner with regard to purifying the afflictions (one who, having already realized the attention to be cultivated, wishes to purify his mind of the afflictions and rouses, takes up, and rightly and diligently cultivates the apprehending-the-aspect attention).  The yoga practitioner already in habitual practice = having, apart from the apprehending-the-aspect attention, well cultivated the remaining attentions on up to the culmination-of-effort attention.  The yoga practitioner who has passed beyond attention = dwelling in the station of the fruit-of-the-culmination-of-effort attention, having surpassed the attention cultivated by the means-of-effort, and dwelling in the fruit of cultivation.  Again: from the arising of the eager desire to cultivate the wholesome dharmas, on up to before the wholesome roots conducive to penetration have arisen, one is named a beginner; when the wholesome roots conducive to penetration have arisen (warmth, summit, accordant-acceptance-of-the-truths, the supreme worldly dharma), one is named already in habitual practice; when one has realized-and-entered the assurance of the right course, attained the direct realization of the truths, [being] not [other-dependent] on other conditions, and not carried off by other conditions with regard to the Buddha's noble teaching, one is named having passed beyond attention (having surpassed the attention dependent on other conditions, dwelling in the attention not dependent on other conditions).

義疏Exposition

教學弧:前一子配好了『對病的藥』(五停心)。這一子先把所緣補齊——善巧(治愚)、淨惑(斷惑),四種所緣到此說竟;接著論換一個高度,把「修學」這件事整個的骨架攤開:怎麼受教(教授)、學什麼(三勝學)、靠什麼相順(隨順學法)、哪些會壞(瑜伽壞)、靠哪些力(四瑜伽)、用什麼樣的用心(四作意)。眼,是中間那根脊樑——三勝學(戒定慧):它不只是聲聞道的總綱,更是後來整個唯識修道(資糧→加行→見→修→究竟)的所本。

把所緣補齊:善巧治愚,淨惑斷惑

五停心是「對五種行性下藥」,但還有兩種所緣是「通治愚與惑」的。

善巧所緣治「愚」——蘊、界、處、緣起、處非處五善巧。最關鍵的是蘊善巧:論說,善了知五蘊的「種種差別、非一眾多」之後,要進一步看到「除這些蘊之外,更無所得」——「唯蘊可得、唯事可得,蘊外並沒有一個『我』可得,也沒有常恒不變的東西可得,更沒有一法是『我所有』」。換句話說,蘊善巧就是拿五蘊的解剖刀,把「我」這個錯覺切掉。界善巧看十八界各從別別種子生(界=因義),處善巧看六識由三緣(增上/所緣/等無間)流轉,緣起善巧看十二支唯法引法、無常無我,處非處善巧看因果不亂(善感愛果、不善感非愛果)。五善巧收攏成兩種:蘊善巧顯「自相善巧」,其餘四顯「共相善巧」。

淨惑所緣治「惑」,分兩條路。一條是世間道:觀下地「麁」、上地「靜」——欲界比起初靜慮,過患深重、苦多壽短,所以是「麁」;初靜慮極靜極妙,所以是「靜」。這樣一層層往上厭下欣上,從欲界伏到無所有處。但這只是「暫斷」,不是究竟斷(後時還會相續)。另一條是出世間道:觀四聖諦。論在這裡打了一組好記的醫病比喻——苦諦如病(應遍知)、集諦如病的因緣(應遠離)、滅諦如無病(應觸證)、道諦如良藥(應修習、多修習)。又把苦講成三層:苦苦(苦受本身)、壞苦(樂受變壞、煩惱纏心而生苦)、行苦(連不苦不樂的五取蘊,因無常麁重、不自在,本身就是苦)。

這裡有一處值得留意的伏線:古德遁倫說,「若依真實理門,賴耶捨受是行苦之體」;又解識蘊的「心意識」可以是「賴耶名心、末那稱意、六識名識」。聲聞地講四諦、講識蘊,骨子裡已經透出阿賴耶、末那的影子——這和種姓地「墮賴耶意界」(13-01-01)是同一條線。(這是古德的唯識讀法,並錄,不作單向承用。)

至此,遍滿、淨行、善巧、淨惑四種所緣全部說竟。

全段的脊樑:三勝學

所緣講完,論轉入「修學」。先說怎麼受教(四教授:無倒、漸次、教、證,再加三神變的「諸相圓滿教授」),然後就到了全段的脊樑——三勝學:增上戒學、增上心學、增上慧學

論問得好:為什麼學就是三個,不多不少?答案點出三者的分工:戒是「建立定」(持戒令心一境、能觸三摩地),定是「智所依」(正定令對所知事生如實智見),慧是「辨所作」(清淨智見能證究竟的煩惱斷,而斷惑就是最高的自利,再無更勝)。三者的次第也不是隨意排的,論給了一條漂亮的「戒果鏈」:尸羅清淨→無憂悔→歡喜→安樂→心得正定→如實知見→厭→離染→解脫→無作究竟涅槃。一條從持戒到涅槃的因果鏈,環環相生。

為什麼叫「增上」?兩義:所趣義(為了趣向上一學而修下一學——為趣定而持戒、為趣慧而修定、為趣斷惑而修慧)、最勝義(這三學唯佛聖教獨有,不共外道)。論還補一句要緊的:「有戒未必有慧,有慧必定具足三學」——慧是宗極,戒定是它的根基。

這三勝學,不只收束聲聞道,更是後世整個唯識修道的總綱:《百法》《三十頌》乃至成佛之道講的資糧、加行、見道、修道、究竟,骨架都本於這「戒→定→慧」的增上學。聲聞地在這裡立的,是一張通貫大小乘的修道底圖。論接著還依三學分出三種人(未離欲/倍離欲/已離欲,對應預流/一來/不還)、三根(未知欲知/已知/具知)、三解脫門(空/無願/無相)。

怎麼相順,怎麼會壞

光有學的框架還不夠,論再講「隨順」與「壞」兩面。

隨順學法:先列十種「違逆學法」(女色、愛著諸行、懈怠、薩迦耶見、貪美味、世間戲論、思惟瑜伽作意的十一種過患、愛味定樂、流散、貪命……),再給對治的「十想」(不淨/無常/無常苦/苦無我/厭逆食/世間不可樂/光明/離欲/滅/死想)。其中「光明想」依四光明而立:法光明(聞慧達教法)、義光明(思慧決了義)、奢摩他光明、毘鉢舍那光明。古德景師點得透:教法暗就用聞慧法光明治、義理暗就用思慧義光明治;至於止觀光明,這裡刻意「除而不取」——因為止觀本身正是「學的體」,不能拿學體去當對治障礙的工具。再加十種正向的「隨順學法」(宿因、隨順教、如理加行……離增上慢)。

瑜伽壞有四種,最值得一讀的是第四「邪行所作」。論在這裡几乎是寫了一則警世故事:有人煩惱重卻聰明,會說法、能招來供養,被人尊為阿羅漢;他怕弟子拿真瑜伽來問、自己答不出而失了供養,於是『自己編一套瑜伽』——可這套東西「不順契經、不現戒律、違逆法性」,所以他只敢私下傳、不敢給通三藏的人看(怕被以經律法一撿驗就揭穿)。論一句斷語:這是「像似正法、非真正法、能障正法」。對耽著名利而偽造修法的人,這是一面照妖鏡——也提醒修行人,凡瑜伽都要拿契經、戒律、法性三把尺撿驗。

修行人的齒輪:四瑜伽與四作意

最後兩科,是修行人運作的「齒輪」。四瑜伽=信、欲、精進、方便——由信深生信解,由信起樂欲,由樂欲晝夜策勵精進,由精進攝受方便,能得未得、證未證(各開四種,合十六)。四作意=力勵運轉(初修業折心令住一境)、有間運轉(已得作意而被思間雜、未純)、無間運轉(純修不間)、無功用運轉(加行究竟果·任運無功用)。論還細分餘四作意、所思惟的四相(所緣/因緣/應遠離〔沈掉著亂〕/應修習)、九種勝解,以及三種瑜伽師(初修業/已習行/已度作意)——把一個行者從生手到老參的整個用心歷程,鋪成了一張清楚的階梯。

這一子,把「所緣」收齊,又把「修學」的整副骨架立起來:善巧破我、淨惑斷惑、三學為綱、隨順為助、辨壞為誡、瑜伽作意為用。所緣與修學都備了,下一子(13-02-04)便要正式進入「修」的內容——三十七菩提分,而它的頭一品「四念住」,正是上一子十六勝行已經接通的。

承衍

這一子把「所緣」收攏、把「修學」立骨,兩頭都有承接。承前:善巧(蘊界處緣起處非處)治「愚於自相共相」之機,正承遍滿所緣《頡隸伐多經》「愚諸行自相→蘊善巧」一脈;淨惑世間道(觀麁靜)啟第三瑜伽處之離欲,出世間道(觀四諦)啟見道(13-02-02 所緣)。脊樑向後:三勝學(戒定慧)不只收束聲聞道,更是《百法》《三十頌》乃至全唯識五位修道(資糧→加行→見→修→究竟)之所本綱——本子所立「唯三學所以·次第·增上義」即其根;四作意(力勵/有間/無間/無功用)與三摩呬多地的七作意互讀(地06),十隨順學法的止觀光明、三瑜伽師(初修業/已習行/已度作意),則啟下一子瑜伽修的三十七菩提分(四念住為首·13-02-04)。至於古德在識蘊、行苦處讀出的賴耶/末那伏線(「賴耶名心·末那稱意」·「行苦賴耶捨受為體」),與種姓地「墮賴耶意界」一線相貫——此係古德的唯識讀法,並錄,非單向承用。一子之內,所緣治愚、三學立綱、賴耶露伏線,聲聞地的修道底圖與唯識底色同時鋪就。

Teaching arc: the preceding unit fitted out the "medicine to match the sickness" (the five settling-the-mind objects). This unit first completes the objects — skillfulness (which cures dullness) and affliction-purifying (which severs affliction); with these, the four kinds of object are told out to the end. Then the treatise shifts altitude and lays open the whole skeleton of the matter of "training": how one is instructed (the instruction), what one learns (the three higher trainings), by what one is set in accord (the factors conducive to training), what ruins it (the ruining of yoga), by which powers it goes (the four yogas), and with what manner of attention it is applied (the four attentions). The point of the eye is the spine down the middle — the three higher trainings (discipline, concentration, wisdom): they are not only the master-outline of the śrāvaka path, but the very ground on which the whole of the later Consciousness-Only path of cultivation (equipment → intensified practice → seeing → cultivation → culmination) rests.

Completing the Objects: Skillfulness Cures Dullness, Affliction-Purifying Severs Affliction

The five settling-the-mind objects were "medicine laid down against the five kinds of conduct-nature," but there remain two kinds of object that "cure dullness and affliction alike."

The skillfulness objects cure "dullness" — the five skillfulnesses in aggregates, elements, sense-fields, dependent origination, and the possible-and-impossible. The most crucial is skillfulness in the aggregates: the treatise says that, once one skillfully knows the "manifold differences, the not-one-but-many" of the five aggregates, one must go further and see that "apart from these aggregates, nothing whatever is to be found" — "only aggregates are to be found, only bare events are to be found; apart from the aggregates there is no 'self' to be found, nor anything constant and unchanging to be found, nor is there any single dharma that is 'mine'". In other words, skillfulness in the aggregates is to take the dissecting-knife of the five aggregates and cut away the illusion of "self." Skillfulness in the elements sees that the eighteen elements each arise from their own separate seeds (element = the sense of cause); skillfulness in the sense-fields sees the six consciousnesses flowing on by way of three conditions (the dominant, the object, and the immediately-antecedent-and-equal); skillfulness in dependent origination sees the twelve links as merely dharmas drawing forth dharmas, impermanent and without self; skillfulness in the possible-and-impossible sees that cause and effect are not disordered (the wholesome brings a liked fruit, the unwholesome an unliked fruit). The five skillfulnesses gather down into two: skillfulness in the aggregates manifests "skillfulness in intrinsic characteristics," the other four manifest "skillfulness in common characteristics."

The affliction-purifying objects cure "affliction," and divide into two roads. One is the mundane path: one contemplates the lower ground as "coarse" and the upper as "peaceful" — the desire-realm, set beside the first meditative absorption, is deep in fault, heavy in suffering, its life-span short, and so is "coarse"; the first absorption is utterly peaceful and utterly sublime, and so is "peaceful." Thus, ground by ground, one loathes the lower and delights in the upper, subduing from the desire-realm up to the base of nothing-whatever. But this is only a "temporary severance," not a final one (in a later time it will resume its course). The other is the supramundane path: one contemplates the four noble truths. Here the treatise strikes off a set of easily-remembered sickness-and-cure similes — the truth of suffering is like a sickness (to be thoroughly known), the truth of origination is like the cause-and-condition of the sickness (to be kept far off), the truth of cessation is like the state of no-sickness (to be touched-and-realized), and the truth of the path is like a fine medicine (to be cultivated, cultivated much). It also expounds suffering as threefold: the suffering of suffering (painful feeling itself), the suffering of change (the suffering that arises when pleasant feeling deteriorates and affliction binds the mind), and the suffering of conditioned states (even the neither-painful-nor-pleasant five appropriating-aggregates, being impermanent, gross-and-heavy, and not one's own to command, are of themselves suffering).

Here there is one buried thread worth marking. The ancient master Dunlun says: "If one goes by the gate of true principle, the store consciousness's feeling of indifference is the very substance of the suffering of conditioned states"; and, glossing the consciousness-aggregate's "mind, mentation, and consciousness," he allows that "the store consciousness may be named 'mind,' mentation named 'the deliberating,' and the six consciousnesses named 'consciousness'". The Śrāvaka Stage, in speaking of the four truths and of the consciousness-aggregate, has at bottom already let show the shadow of the store consciousness and of mentation — this is one line with "falling into the store, into the element of mentation" in the Stage of Lineage (13-01-01). (This is the ancient masters' Consciousness-Only reading, recorded here and not taken over as a one-way inheritance.)

With this, all four kinds of object — the all-pervading, the purifying-of-conduct, the skillfulness, and the affliction-purifying — are told out to the end.

The Spine of the Whole Passage: The Three Higher Trainings

The objects told out, the treatise turns into "training." First it says how one is to be instructed (the four instructions: unerring, gradual, teaching, realization, with the "instruction complete in every aspect" of the three miracles added), and then it comes to the spine of the whole passage — the three higher trainings: the higher training in discipline, the higher training in mind, and the higher training in wisdom.

The treatise poses a good question: why are the trainings just three, no more and no fewer? The answer points out the division of labor among the three: discipline "establishes concentration" (keeping the precepts brings the mind to a single object and can touch samādhi); concentration is "that on which knowledge rests" (right concentration causes a true knowing-and-seeing of the thing to be known to arise); and wisdom "discerns what is to be done" (a purified knowing-and-seeing can realize the final severance of affliction, and to sever affliction is the highest self-benefit, than which there is none more excellent). The order of the three, too, is not idly arranged; the treatise gives a fine "chain of the fruits of discipline": pure śīla → freedom from worry and regret → gladness → ease and joy → the mind's attaining of right concentration → knowing-and-seeing as it truly is → disenchantment → freedom from defilement → liberation → the actionless final nirvāṇa. A single chain of cause and effect running from keeping the precepts to nirvāṇa, link engendering link.

Why are they called "higher"? In two senses: the sense of that-toward-which-one-tends (one cultivates the lower training for the sake of tending toward the upper — keeping precepts for the sake of tending toward concentration, cultivating concentration for the sake of tending toward wisdom, cultivating wisdom for the sake of tending toward the severance of affliction), and the sense of the most excellent (these three trainings belong to the Buddha's holy teaching alone, not held in common with the outer paths). The treatise adds one further and pressing line: "one who has discipline does not necessarily have wisdom, but one who has wisdom necessarily possesses all three trainings" — wisdom is the highest term, discipline and concentration its foundation.

These three higher trainings do not only draw the śrāvaka path to a close; they are the whole master-outline of the later Consciousness-Only path of cultivation. What the Hundred Dharmas, the Thirty Verses, and even the path to buddhahood teach — the equipment, the intensified practice, the path of seeing, the path of cultivation, and the culmination — all have their skeleton in this "discipline → concentration → wisdom" higher training. What the Śrāvaka Stage sets up here is a base-map of the path of cultivation running through both the great and the small vehicles. The treatise then, in accordance with the three trainings, distinguishes three persons (not-yet-freed-from-desire / doubly-freed-from-desire / already-freed-from-desire, answering to the stream-enterer / the once-returner / the non-returner), three faculties (the "I-shall-come-to-know-the-unknown," the "already-knowing," and the "endowed-with-knowing"), and three doors of liberation (emptiness / wishlessness / marklessness).

How One Is Set in Accord, How It Comes to Ruin

Merely having the framework of training is not yet enough; the treatise further speaks of the two faces of "conformity" and "ruin."

The factors conducive to training: it first lists ten "factors contrary to training" (women's beauty, clinging attachment to the conditioned, indolence, the view of the transitory collection as a self, craving for fine flavors, worldly frivolous talk, the eleven kinds of fault in pondering the attention of yoga, relishing the pleasure of concentration, dissipation, craving for life…), and then gives the countering "ten conceptions" (the conception of the impure, of impermanence, of the suffering in impermanence, of the no-self in suffering, of loathing food, of the world as not to be delighted in, of light, of dispassion, of cessation, of death). Among them, the "conception of light" is established upon four kinds of light: the light of the Dharma (the wisdom-of-hearing reaching to the taught teaching), the light of the meaning (the wisdom-of-reflection deciding the meaning), the light of tranquillity, and the light of insight. The ancient master Jing puts the point through: when the teaching is dark, one cures it with the wisdom-of-hearing's light of the Dharma; when the meaning is dark, one cures it with the wisdom-of-reflection's light of the meaning; but as for the light of tranquillity-and-insight, here one deliberately "sets it aside and does not take it up" — because tranquillity-and-insight are themselves precisely "the substance of the training," and one cannot take the substance of the training and make of it a tool for countering hindrances. Added to these are ten positive "factors conducive to training" (past causes, conformity to the teaching, application in accordance with principle… freedom from over-weening pride).

The ruining of yoga is of four kinds, and the one most worth reading is the fourth, "that which is done by wrong conduct". Here the treatise all but writes out a cautionary tale: there is one heavy with affliction yet clever, who can preach the Dharma and can draw in offerings, and is honored by people as an arhat; fearing that his disciples will bring true yoga to question him and that, unable to answer, he will lose his offerings, he "makes up a yoga of his own" — but this thing "does not accord with the discourses, does not appear in the disciplines, and runs counter to the nature of dharmas," and so he dares only transmit it in private and dares not show it to one versed in the Tripiṭaka (fearing to be exposed the moment it is checked against sūtra, discipline, and the nature of dharmas). The treatise's one verdict upon it: this is "a semblance of the true Dharma, not the truly true Dharma, able to obstruct the true Dharma." For those who, greedy for name and gain, forge a method of cultivation, this is a demon-revealing mirror — and it warns the practitioner too that every yoga must be checked against the three rulers of the discourses, the disciplines, and the nature of dharmas.

The Practitioner's Gears: The Four Yogas and the Four Attentions

The last two rubrics are the "gears" by which the practitioner operates. The four yogas = trust, aspiration, effort, and skillful means — from trust one deeply gives rise to conviction, from trust one raises glad aspiration, from glad aspiration one goads on effort day and night, from effort one takes up skillful means, and one is able to attain the not-yet-attained and realize the not-yet-realized (each divided into four, sixteen in all). The four attentions = the attention that operates by forcing (the beginner in the work reins in the mind and makes it abide on a single object), the attention that operates with intervals (having gained attention, but broken into by scattered thought, not yet pure), the attention that operates without interval (pure cultivation without break), and the attention that operates effortlessly (the fruit of the culmination of effort · spontaneous and effortless). The treatise further subdivides the four remaining attentions, the four aspects of what is pondered (the object, the cause-and-condition, what is to be kept far off 〔sinking, agitation, attachment, distraction〕, and what is to be cultivated), the nine resolute convictions, and the three kinds of yoga-practitioner (the beginner in the work / one already practiced in conduct / one who has passed beyond attention) — laying out the whole course by which a practitioner, from raw hand to seasoned adept, applies the mind, as a clear stair.

This unit both gathers up "the objects" and sets up the whole skeleton of "training": skillfulness breaks the self, affliction-purifying severs affliction, the three trainings are the master-cord, conformity is the aid, the discernment of ruin is the caution, and yoga-and-attention are the function. With both the objects and the training made ready, the next unit (13-02-04) will formally enter the content of "cultivation" — the thirty-seven factors of awakening — and its very first item, "the four foundations of mindfulness," is precisely what the sixteen excellent practices of the preceding unit have already connected up to.

Carrying Forward

This unit gathers "the objects" together and sets up the bones of "training," and both ends have their taking-up. Carrying forward from before: skillfulness (in aggregates, elements, sense-fields, dependent origination, the possible-and-impossible) cures the occasion of "dullness toward intrinsic and common characteristics," carrying on precisely the one vein of the all-pervading objects' Hastikakṣya-sūtra — "dullness toward the intrinsic characteristic of the conditioned → skillfulness in the aggregates"; the affliction-purifying mundane path (contemplating coarse-and-peaceful) opens the way to the dispassion of the third yoga-station, and the supramundane path (contemplating the four truths) opens the way to the path of seeing (13-02-02 objects). The spine reaches backward: the three higher trainings (discipline, concentration, wisdom) not only draw the śrāvaka path to a close, but are the master-outline on which the Hundred Dharmas, the Thirty Verses, and even the whole five-stage Consciousness-Only path of cultivation (equipment → intensified practice → seeing → cultivation → culmination) rest — the "why only three trainings · their order · the sense of 'higher'" set up in this unit is their very root; the four attentions (forcing / with-intervals / without-interval / effortless) are to be read together with the seven attentions of the Stage of Meditative Equipoise (Stage 06), and the light of tranquillity-and-insight of the ten factors conducive to training, together with the three kinds of yoga-practitioner (beginner in the work / already practiced in conduct / passed beyond attention), open the way to the next unit's thirty-seven factors of awakening of the cultivation-of-yoga (the four foundations of mindfulness first · 13-02-04). As for the buried thread of the store consciousness and mentation that the ancient masters read out at the consciousness-aggregate and at the suffering of conditioned states ("the store consciousness named 'mind,' mentation named 'the deliberating'" · "the suffering of conditioned states has the store consciousness's indifferent feeling for its substance"), it runs one line with "falling into the store, into the element of mentation" in the Stage of Lineage — this being the ancient masters' Consciousness-Only reading, recorded and not taken over as a one-way inheritance. Within a single unit, the objects cure dullness, the three trainings raise the master-cord, and the store consciousness lets show its buried thread: the base-map of the Śrāvaka Stage's path of cultivation and the ground-color of Consciousness-Only are laid down at one and the same time.

考據Apparatus

本子古德偏倚遁倫遁倫《論記》卷七〔T42 0449c19–0453c18〕逐門詳釋(含 瑜伽所作 0453b23·瑜伽師 0453c10)(善巧·淨惑·教授·三勝學·隨順學法·瑜伽壞·瑜伽·作意;並引景·泰·基·法師〔備〕,及婆沙/顯揚/辨中邊/大菩薩藏經/對法/正理/雜心/俱舍等);窺基《略纂》卷八〔T43 0115a03–0115a26〕於本塊高度闕釋——僅釋三學(增上慧唯無漏·定學漏無漏)與瑜伽壞「退失所得」一句,餘多闕(善巧·淨惑·教授·作意四 俱無)。最勝子《釋》無逐句專釋。


一、科判定位

科判系統此段之位
玄奘 T1579 本地分十七地第十三聲聞地·第二瑜伽處·之二末–之三·所緣後二(善巧·淨惑)+修學諸科(教授·學·隨順學法·瑜伽壞·瑜伽·作意·瑜伽所作·瑜伽師)〔T30 0433c01–0437a〕
論文自身善巧五(蘊·界·處·緣起·處非處;攝為自相/共相二善巧)→淨惑(世間道觀麁靜·出世間道四聖諦)→四種所緣竟→四教授(無倒/漸次/教/證+三神變諸相圓滿)→三勝學(戒/心/慧·三根·三解脫門)→十隨順學法(十違逆·十想·四光明)→四瑜伽壞→四瑜伽(信欲精進方便)→四作意(+餘四·四相·九勝解·四瑜伽所作·三瑜伽師)
遁倫《論記》卷七「自下第三解善巧所緣」「第四解淨惑所緣」「第四〔門〕解教授」「第五解三學」「第六解隨順學法」「第七解瑜伽壞」「第八解瑜伽」「第九解作意」〔T42 0449c19·0450b19·0451b05·0451b13·0452a14·0452b28·0452c10·0452c29〕
窺基《略纂》卷八僅三學〔T43 0115a03〕·瑜伽壞退失所得〔0115a26〕;餘高度闕

二、異譯·經內平行對勘

  • 異譯:真諦《十七地論》漢傳僅卷1–3,不涵卷27–28,漢無傳本(佚)·從闕
  • 諸論「善巧」數開合(遁倫·唯錄不判)〔T42 0449c21〕:婆沙第六=四善巧(界處緣起處非處);本《瑜伽》此卷=五(加蘊);攝決擇五十七=六(加根);顯揚十四=七(加諦);辨中邊第二=十(蘊界處緣起處非處·根·世·諦·乘·有為無為);大菩薩藏經第十七=十(蘊·界·處·諦·無礙解·依趣·資糧·道法·緣起·一切法)。唯錄諸數,不判孰是。
  • 八苦俗智/出世智(對法/此論·遁倫問答唯錄)〔T42 0450c06〕:「對法說八苦中前七是世俗智境、後一是出世智境,何故此論八苦竝名出世智境?答:俗智有二〔六行智·聖行智〕…對法約聖行智緣前七苦,此論據六行智緣麁靜,義無相違…」唯錄二論建立之別。
  • 「至教」勘梵(遁倫·古德勘梵·經與古德徵引之約之旁證)〔T42 0451a14〕:「至教者,舊云聖教,梵本無此語,唯云至教,至理之教故。」(古德於「至教量」之名有勘梵之記,唯錄。)
  • 經內平行(攝決擇):攝決擇分聲聞地〔T30 0669b 起〕;三學決擇「亦作是說」(遁倫指下決擇文 0451b17)。
  • 校勘:本段(0433c01–0439b21)大正原書校記全枚舉見目二(附)(<app> 逐條校勘元素雖 0,原書校記以註記形式收錄——「校勘元素零」不等於「無校記」)。窺基 lemma「退失所得瑜伽境」對論本「瑜伽壞」一字異,唯錄。

(附) 校勘(大正原書校記全枚舉)

本段(0433c01–0439b21)大正原書校記共 28 條藏本異讀;另有大正編者原註 1 條(卷末題記類,不採,另列)。底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印);本段無一條升定本案(無古德牒文+義理雙證支持異讀者),異讀並錄備考:

註號底本【大】異讀語境
04330040433c15即【宋】【元】【明】【聖】色蘊·總名(則/即)
04330050433c21〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】是名為蘊
04340010434a08性【明】界善巧·別別界種子
04350010435a02諸【宋】【元】【明】淨惑·世間道(謂/諸)
04350020435a15今【宋】【元】於諸諦·令(令/今)
04350040435c25第十三〔-〕【明】卷首品題行
04360010436a06遍【宋】【元】【明】三勝學段(偏/遍)
04360020436a09辨*辦【宋】*【元】*【明】*慧·辨所作(辨/辦)
04360030436b14持【元】勤修學(特/持)
04360040436c15惰【宋】【元】【明】違逆學法·嬾墮(墮/惰)
04360050436c17間【宋】【元】【明】世間戲論(聞/間)
04360060436c20實【宋】【元】【明】隨順學法(寶/實)
04370010437a21到【聖】無倒教授(倒/到)
04370020437b01之【聖】止息麁重(乏/之)
04370030437b11不作作而【甲】隨順·惡作不作
04370040437b27性【明】瑜伽壞·無種姓
04370050437b27特【宋】【元】【明】同段(持/特)
04370060437c13中【元】語相應調善(由/中)
04370070437c27比丘*苾芻【宋】【元】【明】【聖】*邪行·比丘(比丘/苾芻)
04370080437c29影【聖】私竊教示(彰/影)
04380010438b23揀【元】【明】四作意·無倒(簡/揀)
04380020438b26升【宋】【元】【明】【聖】得所修作意·世出世(勝/升)
04380030438c07慼【聖】淨惑段(蹙/慼)
04380040438c14道【聖】順教·導(導/道)
04380050438c19心【聖】猛盛(止/心)
04390010439b02已*〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】*三瑜伽師·已習行
04390020439b18若【元】【明】段末·名(名/若)
04390030439b18住【元】【明】段末·性(性/住)

全 28 條底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印),無升定本案。帶*者係大正原欄星標,照錄。異讀多屬形近訛(謂/諸·辨/辦·墮/惰·聞/間·寶/實·倒/到)與同詞異譯(比丘/苾芻)。0437003「不作/作而【甲】」之【甲】為別本(唯此段一見),照錄。

附註·不採類 1 條(大正編者原註·非藏本異讀):0435003「此下聖本有光明皇后願文」(卷末題記)——非古德牒文、非字句異讀,錄之以明,不入正表、不升定本案。


三、聖教義之經據(眼·重——三勝學總綱·蘊善巧破我·四諦四喻)

(一) 三勝學=戒心慧次第之全綱(眼·論本自說)〔T30 0435c–0436b〕——唯三學之故:增上戒「建立定」(戒立心一境性令觸三摩地)·增上心「智所依」(正定令如實智見轉)·增上慧「辨所作」(清淨智見證究竟煩惱斷)。次第=戒淨→無憂悔→歡喜安樂→心正定→如實知見→厭→離染→解脫→無作究竟涅槃。增上義=所趣義(為趣上一學而修下一學)+最勝義(唯聖教獨有·不共外道)。「有增上慧必具三學」——慧為宗極,戒定為基。(此即根本論之修道總綱,下諸論〔百法/三十頌〕增上學皆本此。)

(二) 蘊善巧=破我執(眼·論本自說)〔T30 0433c〕——蘊善巧三義(種種差別性·非一眾多性·除此更無所得):「唯蘊可得、唯事可得,非離蘊外有我可得,有常恒住無變易法是可得者,亦無少法是我所有。」蘊外無我、無我所——善巧所緣之治愚,正治薩迦耶見之我執。

(三) 四聖諦·四喻·黑白品因果(論本自說)〔T30 0434c–0435b〕——苦諦黑品果(如病·應遍知)·集諦黑品因(如病因·應遠離)·滅諦白品果(如無病·應觸證)·道諦白品因(如良藥·應修習)。三苦:苦苦(苦受及所依處)·壞苦(樂受變壞·煩惱纏心令變壞)·行苦(遍行五取蘊·不苦不樂受俱行諸蘊無常麁重不自在)。

(四) 三解脫門(論本自說)〔T30 0436b〕——緣有為見過患→無願解脫門;緣涅槃深祈願(極寂靜·甚微妙·永出離)→無相解脫門;於非有(我/有情等)知見為非有→空解脫門。


四、諸家異釋(古德·唯錄不判)

識蘊·二解(遁倫·六識體/賴耶末那六識)

〔遁倫 T42 0450a07〕:「識蘊謂心意識,此有兩解:一云,即六識體有集起義名心、有思量籌慮義名意、了別名識;一云,賴耶名心、末那稱意、六識名識。」(聲聞地識蘊已露賴耶/末那骨架·唯錄二解。)

★ 行苦·賴耶捨受為體(遁倫·真實理門)

〔遁倫 T42 0451b01〕:「若依真實理門,賴耶捨受是行體,常有餘二苦〔苦苦·壞苦〕種所隨,名行苦。」(行苦之體歸阿賴耶捨受·聲聞地四諦中之唯識讀法·唯錄。)

三苦·攝八為三(景·基)

〔遁倫 T42 0450c24·0451a02〕:景云「由約異門故前七苦唯顯苦苦,以因生等多增苦受故」;基云〔苦苦判別〕;「至教者舊云聖教,梵本無此語」〔0451a14〕。

三勝學·增上慧唯無漏/定學漏無漏(基師·遁倫義曰·窺基略纂同)

〔遁倫 T42 0451b17·0451b27;窺基 T43 0115a03·0115a06〕:

基師:「謂於四諦如實知見名增上慧學者,此唯據無漏慧說名慧學,非名有漏。」 〔定學二釋〕初番唯約四無漏靜慮說定學,第二釋「又諸無色及餘等持等至亦名定學」即通漏無漏。 遁倫義曰:「其定亦唯無漏…准下文若有戒定未必有慧,有慧必有戒定,故前解為勝。」 窺基略纂同此辨(增上戒「如前廣說」闕釋)。

隨順學法·四光明·三暗對治(景師·基師·除止觀為學體)

〔遁倫 T42 0452a28·0452b02·0452b08;窺基 T43 0115a22〕:

四光明:「一法光明〔聞慧了達教法〕·二義光明〔思慧於義決了〕·後二〔奢摩他·毘鉢舍那光明〕可知。」 景師判:「於教法心暗→聞慧法光明治·於義心暗→思慧義光明治·於起行為障→止觀光明治;亦可此中但取聞思法義光明治『思惟諸法所有過患』,不取止觀光明——以止觀正是學體。」 〔基師同·窺基略纂同:「意取法義二光明能斷思惟瑜伽時障礙法」〕

瑜伽壞·退失所得三釋(景·泰·基)+邪行(泰師)

〔遁倫 T42 0452c02·0452c05;窺基 T43 0115a26〕:

〔退失所得〕景云「如初預流等伏欲界修得上靜慮、遇緣退失安樂住」;泰云「退失凡夫所觸所證有漏禪定若知見」;基云「即有漏禪定等是也」(窺基略纂同)。 〔邪行〕泰云「性多煩惱、覺慧猛利生便而有、在性聰銳俱生覺知即失瑜伽」;迴轉弟子「隨彼教故名迴轉」(基)。

四瑜伽·方便四(景師判·泰基同·泰師問法師)

〔遁倫 T42 0452c10·0452c22〕:信二行相(信順·清淨·景師準對法);方便四「景師判:護尸羅善守念·無放逸·一心修奢摩他·增上慧法毘鉢舍那;泰基同;泰師又解或有方便不同於此,將問法師,法師云『方便瑜伽義有眾多,隨一為定便違道理』」。

四作意·因緣相(景師·基師「此乃法師之義」)+ 教授·三輪(泰師)

〔遁倫 T42 0451b06·0453a25·0453b07〕:教授「泰云:由神變生尊重〔身輪〕·他心輪尋他心行·漏盡輪如三乘根行悟入為說正法,三輪攝化名攝相圓滿」;作意因緣相景師釋、基師辨「人非人所作即覺知亂相·此乃法師之義」。

〔按目:遁倫·窺基·景師·泰師·基師·法師(備)皆古德;婆沙/顯揚/辨中邊/大菩薩藏經/對法/順正理/雜心/俱舍/智度論=經論(古德所引)。本目唯錄古德異釋與頁錨,不判可否。善巧五蘊界處逐釋·四教授四目·十違逆十隨順逐目·九勝解·三瑜伽師,古德或無別釋(窺基於善巧/淨惑/教授/作意四 闕釋),其義依論本自說。〕


五、術語(漢/古德傳梵·發音輔助)

傳梵(音寫·發音輔助)
阿賴耶ālaya賴耶·藏識(識蘊心·行苦體·遁倫)〔T42 0450a07·0451b01〕
末那manas意(思量·識蘊意)
尸羅śīla戒(增上戒學)
三摩地/等持/等至samādhisamāhitasamāpatti定·等持·等至
奢摩他śamatha
毘鉢舍那vipaśyanā
補特伽羅pudgala數取趣·人
薩迦耶見satkāyadṛṣṭi身見(蘊善巧所破)
善巧/淨惑/教授/三勝學·麁性靜性·四光明·三解脫門·瑜伽壞·力勵運轉—(義譯·從闕)義譯名相·非古德音寫

梵僅古德音寫;義譯名相 IAST 從闕(經與古德徵引之約),不據現代校本擬補。


六、譬喻·修辭

(一) 四諦·四病喻(論本自立)〔T30 0435a〕——苦諦如病(應遍知)·集諦如病因緣(應遠離)·滅諦如無病(應觸證)·道諦如良藥(應修習及多修習)。以醫病四節喻四諦四行相,聲聞道之骨幹。 (二) 「像似正法」(邪行瑜伽壞·論本自立·誡)〔T30 0437c〕——邪行所作瑜伽壞者自立不順契經、不現戒律、違逆法性之瑜伽,覆藏不示善持三藏者,「像似正法、非真正法、能障正法」——以「似法亂真」誡耽利養恭敬而偽立瑜伽者。 (三) 戒果鏈(三學次第·論本自立)〔T30 0436a〕——尸羅清淨→無憂悔→歡喜→安樂→正定→如實知見→厭→離染→解脫→無作究竟涅槃;與初瑜伽處戒律儀之戒果鏈(13-01-03)同骨,於三學處再申。


七、互讀(承衍)

  • 善巧承所緣治愚·淨惑啟離欲道:善巧(蘊界處緣起處非處)治「愚於自相/共相」之機(承遍滿所緣《頡隸伐多經》「愚諸行自相→蘊善巧…」);淨惑世間道(麁靜)啟第三瑜伽處之離欲,出世間道(四諦)啟見道。
  • 三勝學=根本論修道總綱 → 後出諸論:增上戒/心/慧三學,為《百法》《三十頌》乃至全唯識修道(資糧→加行→見→修→究竟)之所本綱;本段「唯三學所以·次第·增上義」即其根。
  • 四念住·四作意 → 瑜伽修·三摩呬多地:四作意(力勵/有間/無間/無功用)與七作意(三摩呬多地·地06)互讀;十隨順學法之止觀光明、三瑜伽師(初修業/已習行/已度作意)啟下文瑜伽修(13-02-04 三十七菩提分·四念住為首)。
  • 賴耶/末那骨架(聲聞地之唯識伏線):識蘊二解(賴耶名心·末那稱意)·行苦賴耶捨受為體(遁倫)——聲聞地四諦中已露阿賴耶/末那,與種姓地「墮賴耶意界」(13-01-01)一線;唯錄古德讀法,非單向承用。

八、校本定位

  • 底本:CBETA T30n1579 卷27–28·第二瑜伽處·善巧淨惑+修學諸科 0433c01–0437a。
  • 古德頁錨:遁倫《論記》卷七 T42 0449c19–0453c18。最勝子 T1580 無逐句專釋。
  • 校勘:本段(0433c01–0439b21)大正原書校記 28 條藏本異讀全枚舉(目二(附)·正文錨全定位·底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印)·無升定本案)+不採類 1 條(卷末題記);諸論善巧數開合·八苦俗/出世智·至教勘梵·定學漏無漏(唯錄目二/四);真諦卷27–28 佚從闕。

Eight-heading apparatus · the canonical verbatim of the treatise itself is the ground · the cited grounds = scripture and the ancient masters (T1580 Jinaputra's Commentary / T1829 Kuiji's Concise Compendium / T1828 Dunlun's Notes) · fully 漢. A single-source Western Sanskrit edition + the Tibetan translation = not a ground; Sanskrit appears only as the ancient masters' transliteration, and where there is none it is left blank. Where the ancient masters diverge, it is recorded only and not adjudicated. This stage has no "East–West cross-view" heading. This unit leans toward Dunlun among the ancient masters: Dunlun's Notes, fasc. 7 〔T42 0449c19–0453c18〕 glosses each doorway in detail (including "the doings of yoga" 0453b23 · "the yoga practitioner" 0453c10) (skillfulness · affliction-purifying · instruction · the three superior trainings · the dharmas of according-with training · the impairment of yoga · yoga · attention; and it cites Jing · Tai · Kuiji · the Dharma-master 〔Bei〕, and the Mahāvibhāṣā / Xianyang / Madhyāntavibhāga / Mahābodhisattvapiṭaka-sūtra / Abhidharma[-samuccaya] / Nyāyānusāra / Kṣudraka / Kośa, etc.); Kuiji's Concise Compendium, fasc. 8 〔T43 0115a03–0115a26〕 is largely absent of glosses on this block — it glosses only the three trainings (higher wisdom is exclusively uncontaminated · the training in concentration is both contaminated and uncontaminated) and the one line of the impairment of yoga, "the falling-away of what has been attained," the rest mostly absent (skillfulness · affliction-purifying · instruction · the four attentions — none). Jinaputra's Commentary has no sequential dedicated gloss.


I. Doctrinal-Outline Placement

Outline systemPlacement of this passage
Xuanzang T1579, the seventeen stages of the Basic SectionThe thirteenth stage, the Śrāvaka Stage · the Second Yoga-Station · the latter part of "part two" through "part three" · the last two objects (skillfulness · affliction-purifying) + the several divisions of training (instruction · training · the dharmas of according-with training · the impairment of yoga · yoga · attention · the doings of yoga · the yoga practitioner) 〔T30 0433c01–0437a〕
The treatise itselfThe five skillfulnesses (aggregates · elements · sense-spheres · dependent origination · the possible-and-impossible; gathered into the two skillfulnesses of own-mark / common-mark) → affliction-purifying (the mundane path contemplating the coarse-and-calm · the four noble truths of the supramundane path) → the four objects complete → the four instructions (non-erroneous / gradual / teaching / realization + the perfection of the marks of the three miracles) → the three superior trainings (discipline / mind / wisdom · the three faculties · the three gates of liberation) → the ten dharmas of according-with training (the ten contraventions · the ten perceptions · the four illuminations) → the four impairments of yoga → the four yogas (faith, aspiration, vigor, skillful means) → the four attentions (+ another four · the four marks · the nine resolute convictions · the four doings of yoga · the three yoga practitioners)
Dunlun's Notes, fasc. 7"From here on, third, the explanation of the object skillfulness"; "fourth, the explanation of the affliction-purifying object"; "the fourth 〔doorway〕, the explanation of instruction"; "fifth, the explanation of the three trainings"; "sixth, the explanation of the dharmas of according-with training"; "seventh, the explanation of the impairment of yoga"; "eighth, the explanation of yoga"; "ninth, the explanation of attention" 〔T42 0449c19 · 0450b19 · 0451b05 · 0451b13 · 0452a14 · 0452b28 · 0452c10 · 0452c29〕
Kuiji's Concise Compendium, fasc. 8Only the three trainings 〔T43 0115a03〕 · the impairment of yoga, "the falling-away of what has been attained" 〔0115a26〕; the rest largely absent

II. Alternate Translations · Collation of In-Scripture Parallels

  • Alternate translation: Paramārtha's Treatise on the Seventeen Stages survives in Chinese transmission only in fasc. 1–3, and does not cover fasc. 27–28, so there is no transmitted Chinese witness (lost) · omitted.
  • The opening-and-combining of the number of "skillfulnesses" in the various treatises (Dunlun · recorded only, not adjudicated) 〔T42 0449c21〕: Mahāvibhāṣā fasc. 6 = four skillfulnesses (elements, sense-spheres, dependent origination, the possible-and-impossible); this fascicle of the present Yogācārabhūmi = five (adding the aggregates); the Section on Ascertainment fasc. 57 = six (adding the faculties); Xianyang fasc. 14 = seven (adding the truths); Madhyāntavibhāga fasc. 2 = ten (aggregates, elements, sense-spheres, dependent origination, the possible-and-impossible · faculties · time · truths · vehicles · the conditioned and the unconditioned); Mahābodhisattvapiṭaka-sūtra fasc. 17 = ten (aggregates · elements · sense-spheres · truths · the unobstructed knowledges · resort · the requisites · the dharmas of the path · dependent origination · all dharmas). It records the several numbers only and does not adjudicate which is right.
  • The eight sufferings, mundane knowledge / supramundane knowledge (the Abhidharma[-samuccaya] / the present treatise · Dunlun's question-and-answer, recorded only) 〔T42 0450c06〕: 「對法說八苦中前七是世俗智境、後一是出世智境,何故此論八苦竝名出世智境?答:俗智有二〔六行智·聖行智〕…對法約聖行智緣前七苦,此論據六行智緣麁靜,義無相違…」 tr. "The Abhidharma[-samuccaya] says that among the eight sufferings the first seven are the object of conventional knowledge and the last one is the object of supramundane knowledge — why does the present treatise name all eight sufferings alike the object of supramundane knowledge? Answer: conventional knowledge is of two kinds 〔the knowledge of the six aspects · the knowledge of the noble course〕 … The Abhidharma[-samuccaya], taking the knowledge of the noble course, has it apprehend the first seven sufferings; the present treatise, based on the knowledge of the six aspects, has it apprehend the coarse-and-calm — there is no contradiction in meaning …" It records only the difference in what the two treatises establish.
  • "The utmost teaching," collated against the Sanskrit (Dunlun · the ancient masters' Sanskrit-collation · a side-witness to the convention of citing scripture and the ancient masters) 〔T42 0451a14〕: 「至教者,舊云聖教,梵本無此語,唯云至教,至理之教故。」 tr. "As for 'the utmost teaching': the old rendering said 'holy teaching,' but the Sanskrit text has no such word — it says only 'the utmost teaching,' the teaching of the utmost principle." (The ancient masters have a note collating the Sanskrit on the term "the measure of the utmost teaching"; recorded only.)
  • In-scripture parallel (the Section on Ascertainment): the Section on Ascertainment, the Śrāvaka Stage 〔T30 0669b et seq.〕; the ascertainment of the three trainings "also speaks thus" (Dunlun points to the ascertainment text below, 0451b17).
  • Collation: for this passage (0433c01–0439b21) the Taishō base text's collation notes are fully enumerated under Heading II (Appendix) (although the <app> collation elements are zero item-by-item, the base text's collation notes are gathered in annotation form — "zero collation elements" does not equal "no collation notes."). Kuiji's lemma 「退失所得瑜伽境」 tr. "the yoga-object of what has been lost by falling away" differs by one character from the treatise's 「瑜伽壞」 tr. "the impairment of yoga"; recorded only.

(Appendix) Collation (full enumeration of the Taishō base text's collation notes)

For this passage (0433c01–0439b21) the Taishō base text's collation notes total 28 canon-edition variant readings; there is also 1 Taishō-editor's original annotation (of the fascicle-end colophon type, not adopted, listed separately). The base text follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); not a single note in this passage rises to a critical-edition emendation (none has both an ancient-master lemma citation and doctrinal support for the variant); variants are recorded alongside for the record:

Note #AnchorBase 【大 Taishō】VariantContext
04330040433c15即【宋】【元】【明】【聖】Form-aggregate · the collective name (則/即)
04330050433c21〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】"these are called the aggregate"
04340010434a08性【明】Element-skillfulness · the distinct seeds of the several elements
04350010435a02諸【宋】【元】【明】Affliction-purifying · the mundane path (謂/諸)
04350020435a15今【宋】【元】On the truths · 令 (令/今)
04350040435c25第十三〔-〕【明】The chapter-title line at the fascicle head
04360010436a06遍【宋】【元】【明】The three-superior-trainings passage (偏/遍)
04360020436a09辨*辦【宋】*【元】*【明】*Wisdom · the accomplishing of tasks (辨/辦)
04360030436b14持【元】Diligent training (特/持)
04360040436c15惰【宋】【元】【明】The dharmas contravening training · sloth (墮/惰)
04360050436c17間【宋】【元】【明】Worldly idle talk (聞/間)
04360060436c20實【宋】【元】【明】The dharmas of according-with training (寶/實)
04370010437a21到【聖】Non-erroneous instruction (倒/到)
04370020437b01之【聖】The stilling of coarse heaviness (乏/之)
04370030437b11不作作而【甲】According-with · the not-doing of wrongdoing
04370040437b27性【明】The impairment of yoga · lack of lineage
04370050437b27特【宋】【元】【明】The same passage (持/特)
04370060437c13中【元】Speech being fitting and well-controlled (由/中)
04370070437c27比丘*苾芻【宋】【元】【明】【聖】*Wrong conduct · the monk (比丘/苾芻)
04370080437c29影【聖】Teaching secretly and privately (彰/影)
04380010438b23揀【元】【明】The four attentions · non-erroneous (簡/揀)
04380020438b26升【宋】【元】【明】【聖】The attention of attaining what is cultivated · mundane-and-supramundane (勝/升)
04380030438c07慼【聖】The affliction-purifying passage (蹙/慼)
04380040438c14道【聖】According-with the teaching · leading (導/道)
04380050438c19心【聖】Fierce and intense (止/心)
04390010439b02已*〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】*The three yoga practitioners · the one who has practiced
04390020439b18若【元】【明】Passage-end · 名 (名/若)
04390030439b18住【元】【明】Passage-end · 性 (性/住)

All 28 notes: the base text follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); none rises to a critical-edition emendation. The variants are mostly form-close errors (謂/諸 · 辨/辦 · 墮/惰 · 聞/間 · 寶/實 · 倒/到) and one-and-the-same-word alternate renderings (比丘/苾芻). At 0437003, the 【甲】 of 「不作/作而【甲】」 is a separate edition (seen only once, in this passage); recorded as-is.

Appendix note · not-adopted class, 1 item (a Taishō-editor's original annotation · not a canon-edition variant reading): at 0435003, 「此下聖本有光明皇后願文」 tr. "below this the Sheng edition has the vow-text of Empress Kōmyō" (a fascicle-end colophon) — neither an ancient-master lemma nor a character-and-phrase variant; recorded for clarity, not entered into the main table and not raised to a critical-edition emendation.


III. The Scriptural Grounds for the Holy Teaching's Meaning (the Point of the Eye · weighty — the whole rubric of the three superior trainings · aggregate-skillfulness breaking the self · the four truths and the four similes)

(1) The three superior trainings = the entire rubric of the sequence discipline-mind-wisdom (the Point of the Eye · the treatise's own statement) 〔T30 0435c–0436b〕 — the reason there are only three trainings: the higher discipline "sets up concentration" (discipline sets up one-pointedness of mind and brings about the touching of samādhi) · the higher mind is "the basis of knowledge" (right concentration lets the knowledge-and-vision-as-it-really-is turn) · the higher wisdom is "the accomplishing of tasks" (pure knowledge-and-vision realizes the ultimate severing of affliction). The sequence = purity of discipline → freedom from regret → gladness and joy → ease and happiness → right concentration of mind → knowledge-and-vision-as-it-really-is → disenchantment → freedom from taint → liberation → the nirvāṇa of the actionless ultimate. The sense of "higher" = the sense of what-one-tends-toward (cultivating the lower training in order to tend toward the higher training) + the sense of the utmost (unique to the holy teaching · not shared with the outsiders). "Wherever there is higher wisdom, there must be all three trainings" — wisdom is the culminating aim, discipline and concentration the basis. (This is precisely the general rubric of the path of cultivation in the root treatise; the higher trainings in the later treatises 〔the Hundred Dharmas / the Thirty Verses〕 all take root here.)

(2) Aggregate-skillfulness = breaking the grasping at self (the Point of the Eye · the treatise's own statement) 〔T30 0433c〕 — the three senses of aggregate-skillfulness (the various-and-distinct nature · the not-one, manifold nature · that apart from these nothing further is found): 「唯蘊可得、唯事可得,非離蘊外有我可得,有常恒住無變易法是可得者,亦無少法是我所有。」 tr. "Only the aggregates are found, only the events are found; there is no self to be found apart from the aggregates, nor any permanent, ever-abiding, unchanging dharma to be found, nor is there the least dharma that is owned by a self." Apart from the aggregates there is no self and nothing owned by a self — the remedy for delusion in the object of skillfulness precisely counters the grasping at self of the view of the transitory collection.

(3) The four noble truths · the four similes · the cause-and-effect of the dark and bright classes (the treatise's own statement) 〔T30 0434c–0435b〕 — the truth of suffering is the fruit of the dark class (like an illness · to be fully known) · the truth of arising is the cause of the dark class (like the cause of an illness · to be kept away from) · the truth of cessation is the fruit of the bright class (like the absence of illness · to be touched and realized) · the truth of the path is the cause of the bright class (like a good medicine · to be cultivated). The three sufferings: the suffering of suffering (painful feeling and its supporting bases) · the suffering of change (the transformation-and-decay of pleasant feeling · the afflictions binding the mind and bringing about the transformation-and-decay) · the suffering of formations (the all-pervading five appropriating aggregates · the aggregates that operate together with neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling, impermanent, coarse-and-heavy, not under one's own mastery).

(4) The three gates of liberation (the treatise's own statement) 〔T30 0436b〕 — apprehending the conditioned and seeing its faults → the liberation-gate of the wishless; apprehending nirvāṇa and aspiring deeply to it (utterly calm · exceedingly subtle · everlastingly beyond) → the liberation-gate of the markless; knowing-and-seeing the non-existent (self / sentient being, etc.) as non-existent → the liberation-gate of emptiness.


IV. The Explanations of the Various Masters (the Ancients · recorded only, not adjudicated)

The consciousness-aggregate · two glosses (Dunlun · the essence of the six consciousnesses / store consciousness, mentation, and the six consciousnesses)

〔Dunlun T42 0450a07〕: 「識蘊謂心意識,此有兩解:一云,即六識體有集起義名心、有思量籌慮義名意、了別名識;一云,賴耶名心、末那稱意、六識名識。」 tr. "The consciousness-aggregate means mind, mentation, and consciousness; there are two glosses of this. One says: it is the essence of the six consciousnesses — having the sense of amassing-and-arising it is called 'mind,' having the sense of deliberating-and-calculating it is called 'mentation,' discerning it is called 'consciousness.' One says: the store consciousness is called 'mind,' the mentation (manas) is termed 'mentation,' the six consciousnesses are called 'consciousness.'" (Even in the Śrāvaka Stage the consciousness-aggregate already discloses the framework of the store consciousness / the mentation · two glosses recorded only.)

★ The suffering of formations · the store consciousness's neutral feeling as its substance (Dunlun · the doorway of ultimate principle)

〔Dunlun T42 0451b01〕: 「若依真實理門,賴耶捨受是行體,常有餘二苦〔苦苦·壞苦〕種所隨,名行苦。」 tr. "If one goes by the doorway of ultimate principle, the store consciousness's neutral feeling is the substance of the formations, ever attended by the seeds of the other two sufferings 〔the suffering of suffering · the suffering of change〕, and so is named the suffering of formations." (The substance of the suffering of formations is traced to the ālaya's neutral feeling · a consciousness-only reading within the four truths of the Śrāvaka Stage · recorded only.)

The three sufferings · gathering the eight into three (Jing · Kuiji)

〔Dunlun T42 0450c24 · 0451a02〕: Jing says, 「由約異門故前七苦唯顯苦苦,以因生等多增苦受故」 tr. "because it is by a different doorway, the first seven sufferings display only the suffering of suffering, since cause-and-birth and the rest mostly increase painful feeling"; Kuiji 〔on distinguishing the suffering of suffering〕; 「至教者舊云聖教,梵本無此語」 tr. "as for 'the utmost teaching,' the old rendering said 'holy teaching,' but the Sanskrit text has no such word" 〔0451a14〕.

The three superior trainings · higher wisdom is exclusively uncontaminated / the training in concentration is both contaminated and uncontaminated (Master Kuiji · Dunlun's "the meaning says" · Kuiji's Concise Compendium agrees)

〔Dunlun T42 0451b17 · 0451b27; Kuiji T43 0115a03 · 0115a06〕:

Master Kuiji: 「謂於四諦如實知見名增上慧學者,此唯據無漏慧說名慧學,非名有漏。」 tr. "As for 'knowing-and-seeing the four truths as they really are, named the training in higher wisdom' — this names the training in wisdom exclusively on the basis of uncontaminated wisdom, not naming the contaminated." 〔Two glosses on the training in concentration〕 The first round names the training in concentration exclusively on the basis of the four uncontaminated meditative absorptions; the second gloss, 「又諸無色及餘等持等至亦名定學」 tr. "moreover the formless [attainments] and the other concentrations and meditative attainments are also named the training in concentration," is then inclusive of both contaminated and uncontaminated. Dunlun's meaning says: 「其定亦唯無漏…准下文若有戒定未必有慧,有慧必有戒定,故前解為勝。」 tr. "That concentration too is exclusively uncontaminated … in accord with the text below, if there is discipline and concentration there need not be wisdom, but where there is wisdom there must be discipline and concentration; therefore the former gloss is superior." Kuiji's Concise Compendium agrees with this discernment (the higher discipline, "as widely explained before," is left unglossed).

The dharmas of according-with training · the four illuminations · the remedy for the three darknesses (Master Jing · Master Kuiji · excluding tranquillity-and-insight as the substance of training)

〔Dunlun T42 0452a28 · 0452b02 · 0452b08; Kuiji T43 0115a22〕:

The four illuminations: 「一法光明〔聞慧了達教法〕·二義光明〔思慧於義決了〕·後二〔奢摩他·毘鉢舍那光明〕可知。」 tr. "First, the illumination of dharma 〔the wisdom of hearing comprehending the teaching-dharma〕 · second, the illumination of meaning 〔the wisdom of reflection deciding upon the meaning〕 · the latter two 〔the illumination of tranquillity · of insight〕 may be understood." Master Jing's judgment: 「於教法心暗→聞慧法光明治·於義心暗→思慧義光明治·於起行為障→止觀光明治;亦可此中但取聞思法義光明治『思惟諸法所有過患』,不取止觀光明——以止觀正是學體。」 tr. "Darkness of mind toward the teaching-dharma → remedied by the dharma-illumination of the wisdom of hearing · darkness of mind toward the meaning → remedied by the meaning-illumination of the wisdom of reflection · obstruction toward setting-out-in-practice → remedied by the illumination of tranquillity-and-insight; but it is also admissible that here one takes only the dharma-and-meaning illuminations of hearing-and-reflection to remedy 'reflecting on the faults present in all dharmas,' and does not take the illumination of tranquillity-and-insight — because tranquillity-and-insight is precisely the substance of training." 〔Master Kuiji agrees · Kuiji's Concise Compendium agrees: 「意取法義二光明能斷思惟瑜伽時障礙法」 tr. "the intent is to take the two illuminations of dharma and meaning as able to sever the dharmas that obstruct at the time of reflecting on yoga."〕

The impairment of yoga · the three glosses on the falling-away of what has been attained (Jing · Tai · Kuiji) + wrong conduct (Master Tai)

〔Dunlun T42 0452c02 · 0452c05; Kuiji T43 0115a26〕:

〔The falling-away of what has been attained〕 Jing says, 「如初預流等伏欲界修得上靜慮、遇緣退失安樂住」 tr. "as when a first stream-enterer and the like, having suppressed the desire realm and cultivated-and-attained a higher meditative absorption, on meeting a condition falls away from and loses the blissful dwelling"; Tai says, 「退失凡夫所觸所證有漏禪定若知見」 tr. "the falling-away and losing of the contaminated meditative concentration touched and realized by an ordinary being, or of its knowledge-and-vision"; Kuiji says, 「即有漏禪定等是也」 tr. "it is precisely the contaminated meditative concentration and the like" (Kuiji's Concise Compendium agrees). 〔Wrong conduct〕 Tai says, 「性多煩惱、覺慧猛利生便而有、在性聰銳俱生覺知即失瑜伽」 tr. "one whose nature is much-afflicted, whose awakened-wisdom is keen and sharp, present readily from birth, sharp and acute in nature, whose innate awareness at once loses yoga"; the wheeling-round disciple, 「隨彼教故名迴轉」 tr. "following that one's teaching, is therefore named 'wheeling-round'" (Kuiji).

The four yogas · the four skillful means (Master Jing's judgment · Tai and Kuiji agree · Master Tai asks the Dharma-master)

〔Dunlun T42 0452c10 · 0452c22〕: the two aspects of faith (accordant-faith · purity · Master Jing, in accord with the Abhidharma[-samuccaya]); the four skillful means, 「景師判:護尸羅善守念·無放逸·一心修奢摩他·增上慧法毘鉢舍那;泰基同;泰師又解或有方便不同於此,將問法師,法師云『方便瑜伽義有眾多,隨一為定便違道理』」 tr. "Master Jing's judgment: guarding the śīla and well-keeping mindfulness · non-heedlessness · single-mindedly cultivating tranquillity · the insight of the dharma of higher wisdom; Tai and Kuiji agree; Master Tai further glosses that there may be skillful means different from these, and being about to ask the Dharma-master, the Dharma-master said, 'the sense of skillful-means yoga is manifold; to fix upon any single one straightaway contravenes the principle.'"

The four attentions · the mark of cause-and-condition (Master Jing · Master Kuiji "this is the Dharma-master's meaning") + instruction · the three wheels (Master Tai)

〔Dunlun T42 0451b06 · 0453a25 · 0453b07〕: instruction, 「泰云:由神變生尊重〔身輪〕·他心輪尋他心行·漏盡輪如三乘根行悟入為說正法,三輪攝化名攝相圓滿」 tr. "Tai says: by the miracle [of transformation] reverence arises 〔the wheel of the body〕 · the wheel of others' minds probes the workings of others' minds · the wheel of the exhaustion of outflows, in accord with the faculties and practice of the three vehicles, brings about entering-and-awakening for the sake of expounding the right dharma; gathering-and-transforming by the three wheels is named the perfection of the marks of gathering"; the mark of cause-and-condition of attention is glossed by Master Jing, and Master Kuiji discerns, 「人非人所作即覺知亂相·此乃法師之義」 tr. "what is done by humans and non-humans is precisely the awareness of disturbed marks · this is the Dharma-master's meaning."

〔Note on this heading: Dunlun · Kuiji · Master Jing · Master Tai · Master Kuiji · the Dharma-master (Bei) are all ancient masters; the Mahāvibhāṣā / Xianyang / Madhyāntavibhāga / Mahābodhisattvapiṭaka-sūtra / Abhidharma[-samuccaya] / Nyāyānusāra / Kṣudraka / Kośa / [Mahāprajñāpāramitā-]śāstra = scriptures and treatises (cited by the ancient masters). This heading records only the ancient masters' divergent explanations and their page-anchors, and does not adjudicate whether they are admissible. The sequential glosses on the five skillfulnesses of aggregates-elements-sense-spheres · the four headings of the four instructions · the item-by-item ten contraventions and ten according-withs · the nine resolute convictions · the three yoga practitioners — for these the ancient masters may have no separate gloss (Kuiji is absent of glosses on all four of skillfulness / affliction-purifying / instruction / attention), and their meaning rests on the treatise's own statement.〕


V. Terminology (漢 / the ancient masters' transmitted Sanskrit · pronunciation aid)

Transmitted Sanskrit (transliteration · pronunciation aid)Sense
阿賴耶ālayaThe store consciousness · the store-house consciousness (the consciousness-aggregate as "mind" · the substance of the suffering of formations · Dunlun) 〔T42 0450a07 · 0451b01〕
末那manasMentation (deliberation · the consciousness-aggregate as "mentation")
尸羅śīlaDiscipline (the higher discipline training)
三摩地/等持/等至samādhisamāhitasamāpattiConcentration · concentration · meditative attainment
奢摩他śamathaTranquillity
毘鉢舍那vipaśyanāInsight
補特伽羅pudgalaThe one who takes up rebirth · the person
薩迦耶見satkāyadṛṣṭiThe view of the transitory collection (broken by aggregate-skillfulness)
善巧/淨惑/教授/三勝學·麁性靜性·四光明·三解脫門·瑜伽壞·力勵運轉— (rendered by meaning · omitted)Meaning-rendered terms · not the ancient masters' transliterations

The Sanskrit is only the ancient masters' transliteration; for terms rendered by meaning the IAST is omitted (the convention of citing scripture and the ancient masters), and is not supplemented from modern critical editions.


VI. Similes · Rhetoric

(1) The four truths · the four illness-similes (established by the treatise itself) 〔T30 0435a〕 — the truth of suffering is like an illness (to be fully known) · the truth of arising is like the cause-and-condition of an illness (to be kept away from) · the truth of cessation is like the absence of illness (to be touched and realized) · the truth of the path is like a good medicine (to be cultivated and cultivated much). It figures the four truths and their four aspects by the four phases of doctoring an illness — the backbone of the śrāvaka path. (2) "Semblance of the right dharma" (the impairment of yoga of wrong conduct · established by the treatise itself · an admonition) 〔T30 0437c〕 — one whose impairment of yoga is by wrong conduct sets up on his own a yoga that does not accord with the discourses, does not show forth in the disciplinary code, and contravenes the nature of the dharma, covering it over and not disclosing it to those who well uphold the Tripiṭaka: it is 「像似正法、非真正法、能障正法」 tr. "a semblance of the right dharma, not the truly right dharma, able to obstruct the right dharma" — figuring by "a semblance-dharma confounding the true" an admonition to those who, coveting gain and reverence, falsely set up a yoga. (3) The chain of the fruits of discipline (the sequence of the three trainings · established by the treatise itself) 〔T30 0436a〕 — purity of śīla → freedom from regret → gladness → happiness → right concentration → knowledge-and-vision-as-it-really-is → disenchantment → freedom from taint → liberation → the nirvāṇa of the actionless ultimate; sharing the same bone with the chain of the fruits of discipline of the discipline-restraint of the first yoga-station (13-01-03), restated here at the site of the three trainings.


VII. Cross-Reading (Carrying-Forward)

  • Skillfulness carries forward the object's remedy for delusion · affliction-purifying opens the path of freedom from craving: skillfulness (aggregates, elements, sense-spheres, dependent origination, the possible-and-impossible) remedies the disposition of "delusion about own-mark / common-mark" (carrying forward the all-pervading object's Revata-sūtra, "deluded about the own-mark of the formations → aggregate-skillfulness …"); the affliction-purifying mundane path (coarse-and-calm) opens the freedom from craving of the third yoga-station, and the supramundane path (the four truths) opens the path of vision.
  • The three superior trainings = the general rubric of the path of cultivation in the root treatise → the treatises issuing later: the three trainings of higher discipline / mind / wisdom are the rubric on which the whole path of cultivation of the Hundred Dharmas, the Thirty Verses, and indeed all Consciousness-Only (the requisites → the intensified effort → vision → cultivation → the ultimate) takes root; this passage's "the reason there are only three trainings · the sequence · the sense of 'higher'" is its root.
  • The four foundations of mindfulness · the four attentions → the cultivation of yoga · the Stage of Meditative Equipoise: the four attentions (with-exertion / with-interval / without-interval / effortless) cross-read with the seven attentions (the Stage of Meditative Equipoise · stage 06); the illumination of tranquillity-and-insight among the ten dharmas of according-with training, and the three yoga practitioners (the beginner in undertaking / the one who has practiced / the one who has passed beyond attention), open the cultivation of yoga below (13-02-04 · the thirty-seven factors of awakening · the four foundations of mindfulness at the head).
  • The framework of the store consciousness / the mentation (the Consciousness-Only undercurrent of the Śrāvaka Stage): the two glosses of the consciousness-aggregate (the store consciousness called "mind" · the mentation termed "mentation") · the suffering of formations with the store consciousness's neutral feeling as its substance (Dunlun) — within the four truths of the Śrāvaka Stage the ālaya / the mentation are already disclosed, of a piece with "falling into the ālaya mentation-element" of the Lineage Stage (13-01-01); the ancient masters' readings are recorded only, not carried forward in a single direction.

VIII. Placement of the Critical Editions

  • Base text: CBETA T30n1579, fasc. 27–28 · the Second Yoga-Station · skillfulness and affliction-purifying + the several divisions of training, 0433c01–0437a.
  • Ancient-master page-anchors: Dunlun's Notes, fasc. 7, T42 0449c19–0453c18. 8, T43 0115a03–0115a26. Jinaputra T1580 has no sequential dedicated gloss.
  • Collation: for this passage (0433c01–0439b21) the Taishō base text's 28 canon-edition variant readings are fully enumerated (Heading II Appendix · all anchors located word-for-word in the main text · the base follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded) · none rises to a critical-edition emendation) + 1 not-adopted item (a fascicle-end colophon); the opening-and-combining of the number of skillfulnesses among the treatises · the eight sufferings, mundane/supramundane knowledge · "the utmost teaching" collated against the Sanskrit · the training in concentration being contaminated-and-uncontaminated (recorded only, Headings II / IV); Paramārtha's fasc. 27–28 are lost, omitted.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing — with AI-assisted consistency checking

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0