瑜伽師地論 意地 · 意識勝作業十四門
提綱
- 七分別:有相·無相·任運·尋求·伺察·染污·不染污——染(顧戀/希樂/執著+欲恚害)vs 不染(出離/無恚/無害)。修行=轉染分別為不染。
- 審慮·如理:不增益(離四顛倒)·不損減(離邪見)=中道認識論。
- 斷善根·非拔種子:斷者唯現行善根相違相續,「非由永拔彼種子」;故能續善根。種子常在=回頭餘地永留(種子說之慈悲面)。
- 醉狂夢覺悶醒:意識變異位·會斷(反襯末那阿賴耶之恒·連「處無心定」八相)。
Outline
- The seven distinguishings: with-marks · without-marks · spontaneous · investigating · examining · defiled · undefiled — defiled (hankering after the past / hoping-and-delighting toward the future / clinging to the present + craving, ill-will, harm) vs. undefiled (renunciation / non-ill-will / non-harm). Practice = turning defiled distinguishing into undefiled distinguishing.
- Deliberating · in accord with principle: not superadding (free of the four inversions) · not subtracting (free of wrong views) = the epistemology of the Middle Way.
- Cutting off the wholesome roots · not uprooting the seed: what is cut off is only the contrary continuity against the present enactment of the wholesome roots; "it is not by reason of any permanent uprooting of those seeds" — hence the wholesome roots can be resumed. The seed abides always = room for turning back is always left (the compassionate face of the doctrine of seeds).
- Drunk-mad-dreaming-awake-faint-revived: the altered states of mental consciousness · it can be cut off (setting off by contrast the constancy of manas and the store consciousness · linked to the eight characteristics of the "attainment of mindlessness").
又諸意識望餘識身有勝作業。謂分別所緣,審慮所緣,若醉,若狂,若夢,若覺,若悶,若醒,若能發起身業、語業,若能離欲,若離欲退,若斷善根,若續善根,若死,若生等。云何分別所緣?由七種分別。謂有相分別、無相分別、任運分別、尋求分別、伺察分別、染污分別、不染污分別。有相分別者,謂於先所受義、諸根成就善名言者所起分別。無相分別者,謂隨先所引,及嬰兒等不善名言者所有分別。任運分別者,謂於現前境界,隨境勢力任運而轉所有分別。尋求分別者,謂於諸法觀察尋求所起分別。伺察分別者,謂於已所尋求、已所觀察,伺察安立所起分別。染污分別者,謂於過去顧戀俱行、於未來希樂俱行、於現在執著俱行所有分別。若欲分別、若恚分別、若害分別,或隨與一煩惱、隨煩惱相應所起分別。不染污分別者,若善、若無記。謂出離分別、無恚分別、無害分別、或隨與一信等善法相應。或威儀路、工巧處,及諸變化所有分別。如是等類,名分別所緣。云何審慮所緣?謂如理所引、不如理所引,非如理非不如理所引。如理所引者:謂不增益非真實有,如四顛倒。謂於無常常倒,於苦樂倒,於不淨淨倒,於無我我倒。亦不損減諸真實有,如諸邪見。謂無施與等諸邪見行。或法住智,如實了知諸所知事。或善清淨出世間智,如實覺知所知諸法。如是名為如理所引。與此相違,當知不如理所引。非如理非不如理所引者,謂依無記慧審察諸法。如是名為審慮所緣。云何醉?謂由依止性羸劣故,或不習飲故,或極數飲故,或過量飲故,便致醉亂。云何狂?謂由先業所引,或由諸界錯亂,或由驚怖失志,或由打觸末摩,或由鬼魅所著,而發癲狂。云何夢?謂由依止性羸劣;或由疲倦過失;或由食所沈重;或由於闇相作意思惟;或由休息一切事業;或由串習睡眠;或由他所引發,如由搖扇,或由明呪,或由於藥,或由威神;而發惛夢。云何覺?謂睡增者不勝疲極故,有所作者要期睡故,或他所引,從夢而覺。云何悶?謂由風熱亂故;或由捶打故;或由瀉故,如過量轉痢及出血;或由極勤勞;而致悶絕。云何醒?謂於悶已而復出離。云何發起身業、語業?謂由發身語業智前行故;次欲生故;次功用起故;次隨順功用為先,身語業風轉故;從此發起身業、語業。云何離欲?謂隨順離欲根成就故,從他獲得隨順教誨故,遠離彼障故,方便正修無倒思惟故,方能離欲。云何離欲退?謂性軟根故;新修善品者,數數思惟彼形狀相故;受行順退法故;煩惱所障故;惡友所攝故;從離欲退。云何斷善根?謂利根者,成就上品諸惡意樂現行法故;得隨順彼惡友故;彼邪見纏極重圓滿到究竟故;彼於一切惡現行中,得無畏故;無哀愍故;能斷善根。此中種子亦名善根,無貪瞋等亦名善根。但由安立現行善根相違相續,名斷善根;非由永拔彼種子故。云何續善根?謂由性利根故;見親朋友修福業故;詣善丈夫聞正法故;因生猶豫,證決定故;還續善根。
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
意識比起其餘諸識,另有種種殊勝作業:分別所緣、審慮所緣,以及醉、狂、夢、覺、悶、醒,能發起身語業、能離欲、離欲退、斷善根、續善根、死、生等。〔死·生詳 M3。〕
分別所緣(七種分別)
什麼是分別所緣?由七種分別:有相、無相、任運、尋求、伺察、染污、不染污。有相分別:對先前所受之義、由諸根成就而善於名言者所起的分別。無相分別:隨先前所引、以及嬰兒等不善名言者所有的分別。任運分別:對現前境界,隨境的勢力任運而轉的分別。尋求分別:對諸法觀察尋求所起的分別。伺察分別:對已尋求、已觀察者,再伺察安立所起的分別。染污分別:與對過去的顧戀俱行、與對未來的希樂俱行、與對現在的執著俱行的分別;以及欲、恚、害的分別,或隨與某一煩惱、隨煩惱相應所起的分別。不染污分別:屬善或無記者——出離、無恚、無害的分別,或隨與信等善法相應,或威儀路、工巧處、及諸變化所有的分別。如是等類,名分別所緣。
審慮所緣(如理·不如理·非如理非不如理)
什麼是審慮所緣?有如理所引、不如理所引、非如理非不如理所引。如理所引:「不增益非真實有」——不在不真實處妄添,如四顛倒(於無常執常、於苦執樂、於不淨執淨、於無我執我,都是增益);「亦不損減諸真實有」——不在真實處妄減,如種種邪見(說無施與等,是損減);又如法住智如實了知所知事,或善清淨出世間智如實覺知諸法。這名為如理所引。與此相違的,當知是不如理所引。至於依無記慧審察諸法者,則是非如理非不如理所引。這名為審慮所緣。
醉·狂·夢·覺·悶·醒(意識的變異位)
醉:由依止(身)羸劣、或不慣飲、或極頻飲、或過量飲,而致醉亂。狂:由先業所引、或諸界錯亂、或驚怖失志、或打觸末摩(致命處)、或鬼魅所著,而發癲狂。夢:由依止羸劣、或疲倦、或食重、或於暗相作意思惟、或休息一切事業、或串習睡眠、或他所引發(如搖扇、明咒、藥、威神),而發惛夢。覺(寤):睡足者不勝疲極、或有事要期而睡、或他所引,從夢而覺。悶:由風熱亂、或捶打、或瀉(如過量痢及出血)、或極勤勞,而致悶絕。醒:於悶絕之後而復出離。
發起身業·語業
什麼是發起身語業?由「發身語業之智」前行,次起「欲」,次起「功用」(作意努力),次以隨順功用為先、「身語業風」轉動,從此發起身業與語業。
離欲·離欲退
離欲:由隨順離欲的善根成就、從他獲得隨順教誨、遠離彼障、方便正修無倒思惟,方能離欲。離欲退:由性軟根、新修善品者數數思惟彼(欲境)形狀相、受行順退之法、煩惱所障、惡友所攝,而從離欲退墮。
斷善根·續善根
斷善根:利根者成就上品諸惡意樂的現行、得惡友隨順、邪見纏極重圓滿到究竟、於一切惡現行中得無畏、無哀愍,能斷善根。但要緊的是:這裡所謂善根,種子也名善根、無貪無瞋等也名善根;所謂「斷善根」,只是由安立「現行善根」的相違相續(被惡現行打斷),故名斷善根——並非永拔那善根的種子。續善根:由性利根、見親友修福業、詣善丈夫聞正法、因生猶豫而證得決定,還能續起善根。
The 漢 root text (Xuanzang, T30n1579) is kept as a de-emphasized visual anchor for bilingual readers; the English below renders every word of it in plain, continuous prose.
又諸意識望餘識身有勝作業。謂分別所緣,審慮所緣,若醉,若狂,若夢,若覺,若悶,若醒,若能發起身業、語業,若能離欲,若離欲退,若斷善根,若續善根,若死,若生等。
Mental consciousness, as against the other bodies of consciousness, has further kinds of distinctive activity: discerning-and-distinguishing its object; deliberating over its object; and being drunk, mad, dreaming, awake, faint, and revived; being able to set bodily action and verbal action in motion, being able to become free of craving, falling back from freedom from craving, cutting off the roots of the wholesome, and resuming the roots of the wholesome; and dying and being born, and so on. 〔Dying and being born are treated in detail in M3.〕
Discerning-and-Distinguishing Its Object (the Seven Distinguishings)
云何分別所緣?由七種分別。謂有相分別、無相分別、任運分別、尋求分別、伺察分別、染污分別、不染污分別。有相分別者,謂於先所受義、諸根成就善名言者所起分別。無相分別者,謂隨先所引,及嬰兒等不善名言者所有分別。任運分別者,謂於現前境界,隨境勢力任運而轉所有分別。尋求分別者,謂於諸法觀察尋求所起分別。伺察分別者,謂於已所尋求、已所觀察,伺察安立所起分別。染污分別者,謂於過去顧戀俱行、於未來希樂俱行、於現在執著俱行所有分別。若欲分別、若恚分別、若害分別,或隨與一煩惱、隨煩惱相應所起分別。不染污分別者,若善、若無記。謂出離分別、無恚分別、無害分別、或隨與一信等善法相應。或威儀路、工巧處,及諸變化所有分別。如是等類,名分別所緣。
What is discerning-and-distinguishing its object? It proceeds by seven kinds of distinguishing: distinguishing-with-marks, distinguishing-without-marks, spontaneous distinguishing, investigating distinguishing, examining distinguishing, defiled distinguishing, and undefiled distinguishing. Distinguishing-with-marks is the distinguishing that arises, in one who is accomplished in the sense-faculties and skilled in naming and language, with regard to a meaning previously received. Distinguishing-without-marks is the distinguishing found in one who merely follows what was drawn forth before, and in infants and the like, who are not yet skilled in naming and language. Spontaneous distinguishing is the distinguishing that, with regard to an object present before one, turns of its own accord along the force of that object. Investigating distinguishing is the distinguishing that arises from observing and searching into phenomena. Examining distinguishing is the distinguishing that arises from examining and settling what has already been searched into and already observed. Defiled distinguishing is the distinguishing that goes along with hankering after the past, with hoping-and-delighting toward the future, and with clinging to the present; and the distinguishing of craving, of ill-will, and of harm, or the distinguishing that arises in association with some one affliction or secondary affliction. Undefiled distinguishing is that which is wholesome or neutral — namely the distinguishing of renunciation, of non-ill-will, and of non-harm, or that which is associated with some wholesome factor such as faith; or the distinguishing found in the paths of deportment, in the crafts, and in the various transformational displays. Distinguishing of such kinds as these is named discerning-and-distinguishing its object.
Deliberating over Its Object (in Accord with Principle · Not in Accord with Principle · Neither)
云何審慮所緣?謂如理所引、不如理所引,非如理非不如理所引。如理所引者:謂不增益非真實有,如四顛倒。謂於無常常倒,於苦樂倒,於不淨淨倒,於無我我倒。亦不損減諸真實有,如諸邪見。謂無施與等諸邪見行。或法住智,如實了知諸所知事。或善清淨出世間智,如實覺知所知諸法。如是名為如理所引。與此相違,當知不如理所引。非如理非不如理所引者,謂依無記慧審察諸法。如是名為審慮所緣。
What is deliberating over its object? It is that which is drawn forth in accord with principle, that which is drawn forth not in accord with principle, and that which is drawn forth neither in accord with principle nor out of accord with it. That which is drawn forth in accord with principle: it does not superadd to what does not truly exist — as do the four inversions, namely the inversion that takes the impermanent for permanent, that takes the painful for pleasant, that takes the impure for pure, and that takes the not-self for a self; and it does not subtract from the things that truly do exist — as do the various wrong views, namely such wrong-view conduct as saying that there is no giving, and so on. Or it is the knowledge of the abiding-order of things (dharma-sthiti-jñāna), which knows the objects of knowledge just as they are; or the wholesome, thoroughly pure, world-transcending knowledge, which awakens to the phenomena to be known just as they are. This is named that which is drawn forth in accord with principle. What runs contrary to this should be known as that which is drawn forth not in accord with principle. That which is drawn forth neither in accord with principle nor out of accord with it is the examining of phenomena by means of a neutral discernment. This is named deliberating over its object.
Drunk · Mad · Dreaming · Awake · Faint · Revived (the Altered States of Mental Consciousness)
云何醉?謂由依止性羸劣故,或不習飲故,或極數飲故,或過量飲故,便致醉亂。云何狂?謂由先業所引,或由諸界錯亂,或由驚怖失志,或由打觸末摩,或由鬼魅所著,而發癲狂。云何夢?謂由依止性羸劣;或由疲倦過失;或由食所沈重;或由於闇相作意思惟;或由休息一切事業;或由串習睡眠;或由他所引發,如由搖扇,或由明呪,或由於藥,或由威神;而發惛夢。云何覺?謂睡增者不勝疲極故,有所作者要期睡故,或他所引,從夢而覺。云何悶?謂由風熱亂故;或由捶打故;或由瀉故,如過量轉痢及出血;或由極勤勞;而致悶絕。云何醒?謂於悶已而復出離。
Drunk: because the supporting body is weak, or because one is unused to drinking, or drinks too often, or drinks beyond measure, one comes to drunken confusion. Mad: whether drawn on by prior karma, or through the elements falling into disorder, or through losing one's wits from fright and terror, or through a blow to a vital point (marman), or through possession by a ghost or goblin, one breaks out in madness. Dreaming: whether because the supporting body is weak; or through the fault of fatigue; or through being weighed down by food; or through attending to and pondering a dark image; or through the resting of all one's undertakings; or through the habituation of sleep; or through being induced by another — as by the fanning of a fan, or by a bright spell, or by a drug, or by spiritual power — one falls into clouded dreaming. Awake: whether the over-sleeper, unable to bear extreme fatigue [any longer], or one with work to do who set a term for sleep, or one induced by another, wakes from the dream. Faint: whether through a disorder of wind and heat; or through being beaten; or through a discharge — as with excessive dysentery and the letting of blood; or through utter exhaustion — one comes to fainting away. Revived: emerging again out of a faint.
Setting Bodily and Verbal Action in Motion
云何發起身業、語業?謂由發身語業智前行故;次欲生故;次功用起故;次隨順功用為先,身語業風轉故;從此發起身業、語業。
What is the setting in motion of bodily and verbal action? Because the knowledge that sets bodily and verbal action in motion goes ahead; next, desire arises; next, effort is set to work; next, with concordant effort leading the way, the wind of bodily-and-verbal action turns — and from this, bodily action and verbal action are set in motion.
Becoming Free of Craving · Falling Back from Freedom from Craving
云何離欲?謂隨順離欲根成就故,從他獲得隨順教誨故,遠離彼障故,方便正修無倒思惟故,方能離欲。云何離欲退?謂性軟根故;新修善品者,數數思惟彼形狀相故;受行順退法故;煩惱所障故;惡友所攝故;從離欲退。
Becoming free of craving: because the wholesome faculties that accord with freedom from craving are accomplished, because one obtains from another the fitting instruction, because one keeps far from the obstacles to it, and because through skillful means one rightly cultivates undistorted contemplation — only so can one become free of craving. Falling back from freedom from craving: because one's faculties are soft by nature; because one newly cultivating the wholesome again and again ponders the shapes and forms of [the objects of craving]; because one takes up and practices things that accord with backsliding; because one is obstructed by the afflictions; and because one is drawn in by bad friends — one falls back from freedom from craving.
Cutting Off the Roots of the Wholesome · Resuming the Roots of the Wholesome
云何斷善根?謂利根者,成就上品諸惡意樂現行法故;得隨順彼惡友故;彼邪見纏極重圓滿到究竟故;彼於一切惡現行中,得無畏故;無哀愍故;能斷善根。此中種子亦名善根,無貪瞋等亦名善根。但由安立現行善根相違相續,名斷善根;非由永拔彼種子故。云何續善根?謂由性利根故;見親朋友修福業故;詣善丈夫聞正法故;因生猶豫,證決定故;還續善根。
Cutting off the roots of the wholesome: it is one of keen faculties who — because there come to be present in him the phenomena of a superior grade of evil intent and inclination; because he gains bad friends who go along with it; because the entanglement of his wrong views, extremely heavy, reaches its full completion to the utmost; because in all his enactment of evil he comes to be without fear; and because he is without pity — is able to cut off the roots of the wholesome. Now here, the seed too is called a root of the wholesome, and non-greed, non-hatred, and the like are also called roots of the wholesome. But it is only by reason of a contrary continuity being set up against the present enactment of the wholesome roots that this is named cutting off the roots of the wholesome; it is not by reason of any permanent uprooting of those seeds. Resuming the roots of the wholesome: because one is of keen faculties by nature; because one sees kin and friends cultivating deeds of merit; because one goes to a good man and hears the true Dharma; and because, doubt having arisen therefrom, one comes to a settled conviction — one resumes the roots of the wholesome once more.
意識為分別與諸「位」之舞台——七分別之染淨一念之轉、審慮如理之中道、醉狂夢覺悶醒反襯末那阿賴耶之恒、斷善根非拔種子。
意識的分別與位差別:能染能淨、可斷可續
意識「望餘識身有勝作業」,鋪開一長串——分別、審慮、醉狂夢覺悶醒、發業、離欲、斷續善根、死生。這不是雜湊清單,而在說一事:意識是「分別」的舞台,也是種種「位」的舞台。五識只了別現前自境,意識卻能分別、能審慮、能在種種狀態間起落,甚至能斷善根又能續。
七分別:染與不染,只在一念之轉
「分別所緣」列七分別,分水嶺在末二。染污分別——「於過去顧戀、於未來希樂、於現在執著」,加欲恚害:對三世起黏著。不染污分別——出離、無恚、無害,與信等善相應。同一個意識、同樣是分別,向顧戀執著去便染,向出離無瞋去便淨。修行不在廢分別(意識本性即分別,廢不了),而在轉染分別為不染分別——把「顧戀—希樂—執著」的慣性,換成「出離—無恚—無害」的相續。
審慮如理:不增不減地如實
如理所引,論下二句極精:「不增益非真實有」(不在不真實處妄添,如四顛倒:無常添常、苦添樂、不淨添淨、無我添我)、「亦不損減諸真實有」(不在真實處妄減,如邪見:撥無施與因果)。如理=不增不減地如實——顛倒是增益、邪見是損減、如理居中如其所是地照。此即中道的認識論。
醉狂夢覺悶醒:意識會斷,末那不斷
醉亂、狂失志、夢惛昧、悶絕、醒復出——意識的種種變異位,暗點一義:意識會被擾亂、會中斷。悶絕時意識斷了人卻沒死,正是地一所伏、攝決擇所證的「處無心定」之理:六識可斷,持身的阿賴耶不斷。對照第七恒行意之「恒」愈分明:六識麁動間斷(醉狂悶絕便無),唯末那、阿賴耶恒行不斷。意識的變異,反襯深層二識之恒。
斷善根非拔種子:回頭,永遠留著餘地
最堪玩味是「斷善根」。斷善根者,利根而上品惡意樂、得惡友、邪見纏極重到究竟、作惡無畏無哀愍——惡到極處。可論隨即補一句要命的話:「此中種子亦名善根……但由安立現行善根相違相續,名斷善根;非由永拔彼種子故。」斷的只是現行善根的相續(被上品惡現行打斷),那善根的種子並未永拔。正因種子在,論緊接說「續善根」:見親友修福、聞正法、生疑而證決定,善根便又續起。
這是種子說落到「人能不能回頭」最切身處的答案:即便惡到斷善根,回頭的餘地也永遠留著——斷的是現行,種子常在。地一、地二所鋪的種子依、阿賴耶,到此顯出它最慈悲的一面:那含藏一切種的藏識,也含藏著任何人回頭的可能。
此地之要
五識身相應地是海面的浪,意地是整片海的深層結構:心(藏識·一切種子之倉)、意(末那·恒審執我之暗流)、識(六轉·了別之表層),加上五十一心所的全部心理活動,盡在此地鋪開。其中第七恒行意「恒審思量為我」一義,是本地分埋得最深的一根伏線——它把「我執」從地一表層的「決定後染」,推進到深層的「恒行執我」。一部唯識所要轉、所要破的那個「我」,到意地才現出它真正的暗軸。
承衍
意地自性「心意識三」,後出唯識論藏承衍而大備:成唯識論卷四–五立第七末那章(恒審思量·四惑相應·三位差別)·卷二–三廣第八與心所;三十頌「次第二能變,是識名末那,依彼轉緣彼,思量為性相」承「恒行意」之頌;《百法明門論》心所五位(遍行·別境·善·煩惱·隨煩惱·不定)即本地助伴所列之論本。攝決擇分復就五識身地·意地重決擇(八相證阿賴耶·廣末那)。
Mental consciousness is the stage on which distinguishing and the several "states" play out — the turn of defilement and purity in a single thought within the seven distinguishings, the middle way of deliberating in accord with principle, the drunk-mad-dreaming-awake-faint-revived that set off by contrast the constancy of manas and the store consciousness, and the cutting off of the wholesome roots that does not uproot the seed.
Mental Consciousness's Distinguishing and Its Differences of State: It Can Defile and Can Purify, Can Be Cut Off and Can Be Resumed
Mental consciousness "has distinctive activity as against the other bodies of consciousness," and the treatise spreads out a long string of them — distinguishing, deliberating, drunk-mad-dreaming-awake-faint-revived, setting action in motion, becoming free of craving, cutting off and resuming the wholesome roots, dying and being born. This is no random heap of a list; it is stating one thing: mental consciousness is the stage of "distinguishing," and also the stage of the several "states." The five sense-consciousnesses discern only the object of their own field present before them, whereas mental consciousness can distinguish, can deliberate, can rise and fall among the several states, and can even cut off the roots of the wholesome and then resume them.
The Seven Distinguishings: Defiled or Undefiled Turns on a Single Thought
"Discerning-and-distinguishing its object" lists seven kinds of distinguishing, and the watershed lies in the last two. Defiled distinguishing — "hankering after the past, hoping-and-delighting toward the future, clinging to the present," together with craving, ill-will, and harm: a sticking-fast to the objects of the three times. Undefiled distinguishing — renunciation, non-ill-will, non-harm, associated with wholesome factors such as faith. One and the same mental consciousness, and one and the same distinguishing: turned toward hankering and clinging, it defiles; turned toward renunciation and non-hatred, it purifies. Practice does not lie in abolishing distinguishing (the very nature of mental consciousness is distinguishing; it cannot be abolished), but in turning defiled distinguishing into undefiled distinguishing — exchanging the habitual momentum of "hankering — hoping-and-delighting — clinging" for a continuity of "renunciation — non-ill-will — non-harm."
Deliberating in Accord with Principle: The Just-as-It-Is That Neither Adds Nor Subtracts
For that which is drawn forth in accord with principle, the treatise's two lower phrases are exceedingly precise: "it does not superadd to what does not truly exist" (it does not falsely add where there is no reality — as with the four inversions: adding permanence to the impermanent, pleasure to the painful, purity to the impure, self to the not-self), and "neither does it subtract from the things that truly do exist" (it does not falsely subtract where there is reality — as with wrong views: denying that there is giving, cause, and effect). Accord-with-principle = a just-as-it-is that neither adds nor subtracts — inversion is superaddition, wrong view is subtraction, and accord-with-principle stands in the middle, illumining things just as they are. This is precisely the epistemology of the Middle Way.
Drunk-Mad-Dreaming-Awake-Faint-Revived: Mental Consciousness Can Be Cut Off, Manas Cannot
Drunken confusion, the wit-loss of madness, the clouded dimness of dreaming, fainting away, and reviving out of it — these several altered states of mental consciousness quietly mark one point: mental consciousness can be disturbed and can be interrupted. In fainting the mental consciousness is cut off, yet the person has not died — which is exactly the principle of the "attainment of mindlessness" that Stage One held down in reserve and that the Section on Ascertainment proves: the six consciousnesses may be cut off, but the appropriating store consciousness (ālaya) is not cut off. Set against this, the "constancy" of the seventh, the ever-active manas, grows all the clearer: the six consciousnesses are coarse, in motion, and intermittent (in drunkenness, madness, and fainting they are gone), and only manas and the store consciousness are ever-active and uninterrupted. The variability of mental consciousness sets off, by contrast, the constancy of the two deeper consciousnesses.
Cutting Off the Wholesome Roots Does Not Uproot the Seed: For Turning Back, Room Is Always Left
Most worth savoring is "cutting off the roots of the wholesome." The one who cuts off the wholesome roots is of keen faculties, with a superior grade of evil intent, gaining bad friends, the entanglement of wrong views extremely heavy to the utmost, doing evil without fear and without pity — evil to the extreme. Yet the treatise at once adds a line of decisive weight: "Here the seed too is called a root of the wholesome … but it is only by reason of a contrary continuity being set up against the present enactment of the wholesome roots that this is named cutting off the roots of the wholesome; it is not by reason of any permanent uprooting of those seeds." What is cut off is only the continuity of the present enactment of the wholesome roots (interrupted by a superior grade of evil enactment); the seed of those wholesome roots is not permanently uprooted. It is exactly because the seed remains that the treatise goes straight on to "resuming the roots of the wholesome": seeing kin and friends cultivate merit, hearing the true Dharma, having doubt arise and thereby coming to a settled conviction — the wholesome roots then are resumed once more.
This is the answer, at its most intimate bearing on "whether a person can turn back," that the doctrine of seeds gives: even in one so evil as to cut off the wholesome roots, the room for turning back is always left — what is cut off is the present enactment; the seed abides always. The seed-support and the store consciousness laid down by Stages One and Two here show their most compassionate face: that store consciousness which holds all seeds also holds the possibility, for anyone whatever, of turning back.
The Essential Point of This Stage
The Stage Associated with the Five Sense-Consciousnesses is the wave on the surface of the sea; the Stage of the Mental is the deep structure of the whole sea: mind (the store consciousness · the granary of all seeds), mentation (manas · the hidden current that ever examines and grasps a self), and consciousness (the six turning consciousnesses · the surface layer of discernment), together with the whole psychological activity of the fifty-one mental factors, all spread out in this stage. Among them, the one sense in which the seventh, the ever-active manas, "ever examines and reckons [things] as a self" is the most deeply buried thread of the whole Basic Section — it drives "self-grasping" onward from the surface-layer "defilement after deciding" of Stage One into the deep-layer "ever-active grasping at a self." That very "self" which the whole of Consciousness-Only sets out to transform and to break through shows its true dark axis only at the Stage of the Mental.
Carrying Forward
The Stage of the Mental's own nature, "mind, mentation, and consciousness — the three," is inherited and greatly amplified by the later Consciousness-Only treatises: the Cheng Weishi Lun, in fascicles four and five, sets up the chapter on the seventh, manas (ever examining and reckoning · associated with the four afflictions · the differences of the three phases), and in fascicles two and three expounds at length the eighth consciousness and the mental factors; the Thirty Verses' "next, the second that can transform is the consciousness named manas; in dependence on that it turns, and it takes that as object; its nature and character are reckoning" inherits the verse of the "ever-active mentation"; and the Hundred Dharmas Treatise's five classes of mental factors (the universal · the object-specific · the wholesome · the afflictions · the secondary afflictions · the indeterminate) are the treatise-source of the accompanying aids listed in this very stage. The Section on Ascertainment further re-ascertains the Stage of the Five Sense-Consciousnesses and the Stage of the Mental (proving the store consciousness by eight characteristics · expounding manas at length).
考據Apparatus
科判:別釋五相之「作業」下,明意識勝作業十四門〔T30n1579 0280b26〕。M2 涵:分別所緣(七分別)〔0280c02〕·審慮所緣〔0280c18〕·醉狂夢覺悶醒·發身語業·離欲〔0281a16〕·離欲退·斷善根〔0281a22〕·續善根〔0281a29〕。死·生=M3〔0281b03+〕。
經據(眼):
- 七分別〔0280c02〕:有相·無相·任運·尋求·伺察·染污·不染污。染污分別=顧戀(過)/希樂(未)/執著(現)+欲恚害;不染污=出離·無恚·無害·信等善相應。→ 修道轉染分別為不染分別之論本。
- 審慮·如理所引〔0280c20〕:「不增益非真實有(如四顛倒)·亦不損減諸真實有(如諸邪見)」——離增益(顛倒)損減(邪見)二邊之中道認識論。→ 辨中邊論·成唯識中道義之先聲。
- 斷善根·種子義〔0281a26〕:「種子亦名善根……但由安立現行善根相違相續,名斷善根;非由永拔彼種子故」——斷善根唯斷現行、種子不拔,故能續善根。→ 成唯識論種子六義(恒隨轉·性決定)·一闡提斷善根而種子在之論本;上承地01–02 種子依阿賴耶。
諸家異釋(古德·標宗·唯錄不判):
- 遁倫《瑜伽論記》T1828·悶絕四緣〔T42n1828 0320a18〕:「四緣故悶,通有心、無心位,亦以心心所為性。」——判醉狂夢覺悶醒之「悶絕」位通有心無心(遁倫錄)。
- 窺基《略纂》T1829·悶絕四緣〔T43n1829 0008b13〕同判:「悶有四緣,通有心、無心,有心位亦以心、心所為性。由彼悶觸,引生心悶。醒體亦然。」——與遁倫同源,悶·醒二體並釋(窺基自著)。二家於「悶絕識斷而身不壞」正扣攝決擇「處無心定·命終時識」六識可斷、阿賴耶不斷之義(見互讀)。
- 二家於斷善根·續善根一段無別出專釋,從闕。
校勘(大正原書校記全枚舉):本段(0280b26–0281b03)大正原書校記共 4 條(校勘標記元素雖無,原書校記以註記形式收錄,全枚舉如下)。底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印);本段無一條升定本案,異讀並錄備考:
| 錨 | 底本【大】 | 異讀 | 語境 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0280c05 | 就* | 熟【宋】【元】【明】【宮】* | 「成就/成熟」句(帶大正星標,照錄) |
| 0280c11 | 顧 | 願【元】 | 染污分別「於過去顧戀」句 |
| 0281a05 | 息 | 意【元】【明】 | 離欲退段 |
| 0281a07 | 惛 | 昏【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 惛昧·醉狂夢覺段 |
互讀:醉狂夢覺悶醒「悶絕識斷而身不壞」↔ 攝決擇八相「處無心定·命終時識」〔T1579 0579a18〕(六識可斷·阿賴耶不斷);斷善根種子義 ↔ 成唯識種子六義〔T1585 0009c〕。
校本:T1579 分別所緣 0280c02·審慮 0280c18·醉狂夢覺悶醒 0280c末–0281a·發業 0281a13·離欲 0281a16·離欲退 0281a19·斷善根 0281a22·續善根 0281a29。大正校記 4 條全枚舉見上;遁倫悶絕四緣 0320a18·窺基悶絕四緣 0008b13。
Doctrinal-outline placement: under the "activity" of the separate exposition of the five characteristics [of mental consciousness], it sets forth the fourteen gates of mental consciousness's distinctive activity 〔T30n1579 0280b26〕. M2 covers: discerning-and-distinguishing its object (the seven distinguishings) 〔0280c02〕 · deliberating over its object 〔0280c18〕 · drunk-mad-dreaming-awake-faint-revived · setting bodily and verbal action in motion · becoming free of craving 〔0281a16〕 · falling back from freedom from craving · cutting off the wholesome roots 〔0281a22〕 · resuming the wholesome roots 〔0281a29〕. Dying and being born = M3 〔0281b03+〕.
Scriptural Grounds (the Point of the Eye)
- The seven distinguishings 〔0280c02〕: with-marks · without-marks · spontaneous · investigating · examining · defiled · undefiled. Defiled distinguishing = hankering (over the past) / hoping-and-delighting (over the future) / clinging (over the present) + craving, ill-will, and harm; undefiled = renunciation · non-ill-will · non-harm · associated with wholesome factors such as faith. → the treatise-source for the path-cultivation of turning defiled distinguishing into undefiled distinguishing.
- Deliberating · that which is drawn forth in accord with principle 〔0280c20〕: 「不增益非真實有(如四顛倒)·亦不損減諸真實有(如諸邪見)」 tr. "it does not superadd to what does not truly exist, as do the four inversions"; "neither does it subtract from the things that truly do exist, as do the various wrong views" — the epistemology of the Middle Way that keeps free of the two extremes of superaddition (inversion) and subtraction (wrong view). → the forerunner of the Middle-Way sense of the Madhyāntavibhāga and the Cheng Weishi Lun.
- Cutting off the wholesome roots · the sense of the seed 〔0281a26〕: 「此中種子亦名善根,無貪瞋等亦名善根。但由安立現行善根相違相續,名斷善根;非由永拔彼種子故」 tr. "Here the seed too is called a root of the wholesome, and non-greed, non-hatred, and the like are also called roots of the wholesome. But it is only by reason of a contrary continuity being set up against the present enactment of the wholesome roots that this is named cutting off the roots of the wholesome; it is not by reason of any permanent uprooting of those seeds" — cutting off the wholesome roots cuts off only the present enactment, the seed is not uprooted, and so the wholesome roots can be resumed. → the treatise-source for the six senses of the seed in the Cheng Weishi Lun (constant continuance · determinacy of nature) and for the icchantika's cutting off the wholesome roots while the seed abides; it carries forward the seed-support and store consciousness of Stages 01–02.
The Explanations of the Various Masters (the Ancients · Marking the School · Recorded Only, Not Adjudicated)
- Dunlun, Notes on the Yogācārabhūmi T1828 · the four conditions of fainting 〔T42n1828 0320a18〕: 「四緣故悶,通有心、無心位,亦以心心所為性。」 tr. "By four conditions there is fainting; it pertains to both the with-mind and the mindless phases, and it likewise has mind and mental factors for its nature." — placing the "fainting" state among the drunk-mad-dreaming-awake-faint-revived as pertaining to both the with-mind and the mindless (Dunlun's record).
- Kuiji, Concise Compendium T1829 · the four conditions of fainting 〔T43n1829 0008b13〕, judging the same: 「悶有四緣,通有心、無心,有心位亦以心、心所為性。由彼悶觸,引生心悶。醒體亦然。」 tr. "Fainting has four conditions; it pertains to both the with-mind and the mindless, and in the with-mind phase it likewise has mind and mental factors for its nature. By that fainting-contact, a fainting of the mind is drawn forth. The substance of reviving is likewise so." — of one source with Dunlun, expounding the two substances of fainting and reviving together (Kuiji's own composition). The two masters, on "in fainting the consciousness is cut off yet the body is not destroyed," fit exactly the sense of the Section on Ascertainment's "the attainment of mindlessness · the consciousness at the moment of dying" — that the six consciousnesses may be cut off but the store consciousness (ālaya) is not cut off (see Cross-Reading).
- The two masters give no separate dedicated exposition of the passage on cutting off and resuming the wholesome roots; wanting, and so omitted.
Collation (Full Enumeration of the Taishō Base Text's Collation Notes)
This span (0280b26–0281b03) carries 4 collation notes in the Taishō base text (although there are no <app> collation-marking elements, the base text's collation notes are recorded in note form, fully enumerated below). The base follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); not a single note in this span rises to a critical-edition emendation; variants are recorded alongside for the record:
| Anchor | Base 【大 Taishō】 | Variant | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0280c05 | 就* | 熟【宋】【元】【明】【宮】* | The "accomplished / matured" phrase (carries the Taishō asterisk mark, reproduced as printed) |
| 0280c11 | 顧 | 願【元】 | The defiled-distinguishing phrase 「於過去顧戀」 ("hankering after the past") |
| 0281a05 | 息 | 意【元】【明】 | The falling-back-from-freedom-from-craving passage |
| 0281a07 | 惛 | 昏【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 惛昧 ("clouded dimness") · the drunk-mad-dreaming-awake passage |
Cross-Reading
- The drunk-mad-dreaming-awake-faint-revived's "in fainting the consciousness is cut off yet the body is not destroyed" ↔ the eight characteristics of the Section on Ascertainment, "the attainment of mindlessness · the consciousness at the moment of dying" 〔T1579 0579a18〕 (the six consciousnesses may be cut off · the store consciousness is not cut off).
- The seed-sense of cutting off the wholesome roots ↔ the six senses of the seed in the Cheng Weishi Lun 〔T1585 0009c〕.
Placement of the Critical Editions
- T1579 discerning-and-distinguishing its object 0280c02 · deliberating 0280c18 · drunk-mad-dreaming-awake-faint-revived 0280c-end–0281a · setting action in motion 0281a13 · becoming free of craving 0281a16 · falling back from freedom from craving 0281a19 · cutting off the wholesome roots 0281a22 · resuming the wholesome roots 0281a29. The 4 Taishō collation notes are fully enumerated above.
- Dunlun, four conditions of fainting 0320a18 · Kuiji, four conditions of fainting 0008b13.