瑜伽師地論 菩薩地 · 菩提分品(子二 · 門10–15)
一句:門10–15 以「離言自性」一線貫穿——止安住離言唯事、觀離增減二邊,方便善巧會通空經「但說諸法所言自性都無所有」,忍陀羅尼從無義呪直取「唯有諸法離言自性是自性義」,空三摩地依離言而立,法無我即言說自性都無所有——真實義品之義在此長成六個行門,末以王子四車、病者良藥二喻教人於自己的理解莫執、於後後之法莫拒。
三眼目:
- 止觀四行·大乘不共(眼·重·唯識義):止=於諸法無所分別、觀=真俗二智〔0539c24 起·遁倫「靜慮一緣離諸分別」〔T42n1828 0555c09〕〕;止四行之四「離言唯事……趣向一切法平等性、一味實性」〔0539c29–0540a02〕(泰云「離言唯事依他性」〔0556a01〕·基云「入一味真如義」〔T43n1829 0154a16–a17〕·約位判:地前/初地至七地/八九地/十地入佛地〔0154a20–a22〕);觀四行=離增益邊·離損減邊〔0540a05〕;三三摩地「觀一切事,遠離一切言說自性,唯有諸法離言自性,心正安住」〔0543c07〕——景云「大乘不共三三摩地,以無分別智相應定數一體義說」〔T42n1828 0557c02–c04〕·基「在真觀中義用分立」〔T43n1829 0155b15〕·攝決擇三名寬狹對照〔0698c06–c14〕。
- 會通空經·忍陀羅尼(眼·重·唯識義):聞空性經驚怖謗非佛說〔0541a13–a18〕→「此經不說一切諸法都無所有,但說諸法所言自性都無所有」〔0541a21〕(窺基三性配:遍計無如兔角·非無依他·真如如空·依他如幻·圓成勝義有〔T43n1829 0154b25–c19〕)→「不取少分、不捨少分」〔0541b19〕(基「不取遍計,不捨二性」〔0154c20〕);忍陀羅尼呪「壹胝蜜胝……莎訶」〔0543a07–a08〕→「都無有義,是圓成實」〔0543a11〕→「唯有諸法離言自性是自性義」〔0543a17〕(三藏「加行道中持思此呪故速得真智證於真如,故下文在勝解行地」〔T42n1828 0557a08–a10〕·備云「呪句正詮依他圓成離言無生」〔0557b04〕);願體四說並陳(古師忍/備師智/三藏「思欲信上假立願」/景勝解欲思信〔0557b08–b12〕)。
- 四法嗢拕南·二喻(眼):無常二層(言說自性常無/離言事生滅〔0544a19–a21〕·景「執時熏種成因生彼依他」·測錄西方兩釋「唯識道理……現在見分體上有三世相而得顯現」〔T42n1828 0558b14 起〕);剎那四相(基:大乘生等三相在現在滅在過去·秤兩頭喻〔T43n1829 0155c15·0156a11〕·破生生/破滅相〔0544b27·0544c03〕);法無我=「一切言說自性諸法都無所有」〔0544c21–c22〕;涅槃三重配(無間道/解脫道·伏現行/斷種子〔T43n1829 0156c13–c17〕);王子四車喻(影像勝解→現證追愧〔0545a01 起〕·基配四涅槃「象喻無住」〔T42n1828 0559c12–c14〕)·病者良藥喻(執前藥不捨〔0545b03 起〕)·妙莊嚴車收〔0545b19–b21〕。
附指引:
- 承子一門9 循身觀(「遠離言說自性」〔0539c10〕→門10「離言唯事」);會通段·空三摩地·法無我皆承真實義品(15-01-04)。
- 攝決擇本品本體決擇=0712c07–0713b01(循身觀真如身·道品次第「根是下品力是上品」·十四相麁重縛·依空修念住·十一後後想縛——連「無自性相想」亦縛);品界景師/遁倫(承三藏)二判並錄〔T42n1828 0770b07–b10〕;相縛麁重縛通解深密術語系〔0716b16〕。見〈考據〉目二(二)。
- 異譯:曇無讖(止觀附道品段末·六種名 隨順/立要/異相/逼迫/報恩/清淨·十大願足十·四憂檀那「涅槃寂滅」)·求那跋摩(門12–15 在「助菩提數法餘品第十九」·辭陀羅尼實為神呪+持呪五法特有·大願無十數·涅槃段擴充「如來實常」〔0998a10 起〕);見〈考據〉目二。
- 校勘:本子段大正校記 26 條全枚舉——止四行「由無有相/想【宋元明宮】」〔0539009·義理眼句異讀〕·十大願「第二正願/大願【元明】」〔0543004〕皆並錄;底本從 CBETA 承字讀,無升定本案。見〈考據〉目二(三)。
In one line: Gates 10–15 are threaded through by the single line of the "ineffable intrinsic nature" — tranquillity settles upon the ineffable bare thing and insight keeps far from the two extremes of over-affirmation and under-denial; the skill in means reconciles the emptiness scriptures by "it says only that the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken of phenomena is altogether nothing at all"; the acceptance-dhāraṇī takes, from a spell of no meaning, straight hold of "there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, and this is the meaning of intrinsic nature"; the samādhi of emptiness is set up in dependence on the ineffable; and the no-self of phenomena is just that the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken of phenomena is altogether nothing at all — the meaning of the Chapter on the True Reality here grows into six gateways of practice, and it closes with two similes, the prince's four carts and the sick one's good medicine, teaching one not to cling to one's own understanding and not to refuse the later dharma.
Three points of the eye:
- The four practices of tranquillity-and-insight · uncommon to the Great Vehicle (eye · of weight · Consciousness-Only meaning): tranquillity = discerning nothing at all within all phenomena · insight = the two knowledges, true and conventional 〔0539c24 onward · Dunlun "meditative absorption on a single object, apart from the several discernments" 〔T42n1828 0555c09〕〕; the fourth of the four practices of tranquillity, "the ineffable bare thing … tending toward the equal nature, the single-flavored real nature of all phenomena" 〔0539c29–0540a02〕 (Tai "the ineffable bare thing that is the other-dependent nature" 〔0556a01〕 · Kuiji "enters the meaning of the single-flavored suchness" 〔T43n1829 0154a16–a17〕 · matched to grades of the path: before the grounds / the first to the seventh ground / the eighth and ninth / the tenth ground entering the buddha-ground 〔0154a20–a22〕); the four practices of insight = keeping far from over-affirmation · keeping far from under-denial 〔0540a05〕; the three samādhis "he contemplates all things, keeping far from all intrinsic nature as spoken, [seeing] that there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, and his mind is rightly settled" 〔0543c07〕 — Jing "the Great Vehicle's uncommon three samādhis, spoken in the sense that the non-conceptual knowledge and the associated absorption are of one substance" 〔T42n1828 0557c02–c04〕 · Kuiji "distinguished by function-in-meaning within the true contemplation" 〔T43n1829 0155b15〕 · the broad-and-narrow of the three names, cross-collated with the Section on Ascertainment 〔0698c06–c14〕.
- Reconciling the emptiness scriptures · the acceptance-dhāraṇī (eye · of weight · Consciousness-Only meaning): hearing the emptiness scriptures, [they take] fright and defame them as not the Buddha's word 〔0541a13–a18〕 → "this scripture does not say that all phenomena whatsoever are altogether nothing at all, but says that the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken of phenomena is altogether nothing at all" 〔0541a21〕 (Kuiji's threefold-nature matching: the wholly-imagined absent like a rabbit's horn · the other-dependent not non-existent · suchness like open space · the other-dependent like an illusion · the truly-accomplished present in the ultimate sense 〔T43n1829 0154b25–c19〕) → "grasps no small part and forsakes no small part" 〔0541b19〕 (Kuiji "does not grasp the wholly-imagined, does not forsake the two natures" 〔0154c20〕); the acceptance-dhāraṇī spell "iṭṭhi miṭṭhi … svāhā" 〔0543a07–a08〕 → "altogether without meaning, the perfectly-accomplished real" 〔0543a11〕 → "there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, and this is the meaning of intrinsic nature" 〔0543a17〕 (the Tripiṭaka-master "in the applied-effort path, by upholding-and-reflecting on this spell one swiftly gains the true knowledge and realizes suchness, and so the text below places it at the Ground of Practice-through-Resolute-Conviction" 〔T42n1828 0557a08–a10〕 · Bei "the spell-phrases rightly convey that the other-dependent and the perfectly-accomplished are ineffable and unarisen" 〔0557b04〕); the four readings of the essence of the vow set out together (the old masters, acceptance / Bei, knowledge / the Tripiṭaka-master, "a vow provisionally set up upon the willing-desire-and-faith of thought" / Jing, resolute-conviction-willing-thought-and-faith 〔0557b08–b12〕).
- The four dharma-uddānas · the two similes (eye): impermanence in two layers (the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken ever nothing at all / the ineffable thing arising and ceasing 〔0544a19–a21〕 · Jing "when grasping thus, it perfumes seeds and becomes a cause, giving birth to those other-dependent [dharmas]" · Woncheuk records the two Western glosses "by the reasoning of consciousness-only the three times are established — upon the substance of the seeing-part in the present the characters of the three times appear" 〔T42n1828 0558b14 onward〕); the four characters of the instant (Kuiji: by the Great Vehicle, arising and the three characters in the present, ceasing in the past · the simile of the two ends of a balance 〔T43n1829 0155c15 · 0156a11〕 · breaking the arising of arising / breaking the character of ceasing 〔0544b27 · 0544c03〕); the no-self of phenomena = "the phenomena that are the intrinsic nature of all speech are altogether nothing at all" 〔0544c21–c22〕; the threefold matching of nirvāṇa (the uninterrupted path / the path of liberation · subduing the present activity / cutting off the seeds 〔T43n1829 0156c13–c17〕); the simile of the prince and the four carts (resolute conviction in the image → shame at present realization 〔0545a01 onward〕 · Kuiji matches it to the four nirvāṇas, "the elephant figures the non-abiding" 〔T42n1828 0559c12–c14〕) · the simile of the sick one and the good medicine (clinging to the former medicine, unwilling to cast it away 〔0545b03 onward〕) · gathered up in the wondrously adorned cart 〔0545b19–b21〕.
Appended pointers:
- Carries forward from the first sub-part's Gate Nine, the contemplation of the body along the body ("keeping far from the intrinsic nature as spoken" 〔0539c10〕 → Gate Ten's "ineffable bare thing"); the reconciling passage, the samādhi of emptiness, and the no-self of phenomena all carry forward the Chapter on the True Reality (15-01-04).
- The Section on Ascertainment's ascertainment of the substance of this chapter = 0712c07–0713b01 (the contemplation of the body along the suchness-body · the sequence of the path-factors "the faculties are lower-grade, the powers are higher-grade" · the fourteen kinds of coarse-and-heavy bond of character · the cultivation of the foundations of mindfulness in dependence on emptiness · the eleven successive conception-bonds — where even "the conception of a characterless-of-intrinsic-nature" is a bond); the two judgments of the chapter-boundary, Jing's and Dunlun's (the latter following the Tripiṭaka-master), are set out together 〔T42n1828 0770b07–b10〕; the bond-of-character and coarse-and-heavy-bond run through to the terminology-system of the Saṃdhinirmocana 〔0716b16〕. See the Apparatus, Heading II (ii).
- Alternate translations: Dharmakṣema (the tranquillity-and-insight appended at the end of the path-factors passage · the six names according-establishing-a-covenant-a-differing-character-pressure-requiting-kindness-purity · the ten great vows complete at ten · the four udāna, "nirvāṇa-quiescent-cessation") · Guṇavarman (Gates 12–15 fall in the Chapter on the Dharmas Aiding Awakening, the nineteenth · the "eloquence-dhāraṇī" being in truth a divine spell, with the five practices of spell-upholding unique to it · no ten in the great vow · the nirvāṇa passage expanded, "the Tathāgata is in truth constant" 〔0998a10 onward〕); see the Apparatus, Heading II.
- Collation: this sub-part's span carries a full enumeration of the 26 Taishō collation notes — the fourth practice of tranquillity "by having no character / conception 【Song Yuan Ming Palace】" 〔0539009 · a variant reading at the doctrinal eye-line〕 and the tenth great vow "the second right vow / great vow 【Yuan Ming】" 〔0543004〕 are both recorded alongside; the base text follows the CBETA character-readings, with no critical-edition emendation raised. See the Apparatus, Heading II (iii).
此中菩薩即於諸法無所分別,當知名止。 若於諸法勝義理趣如實真智,及於無量安立理趣世俗妙智,當知名觀。 此中菩薩略有四行,當知名止。 一、勝義世俗智前行;二、勝義世俗智果;三、普於一切戲論想中無功用轉;四、即於如是離言唯事,由無有相無所分別,其心寂靜,趣向一切法平等性、一味實性。 由此四行,是諸菩薩止道運轉,漸次乃至能證無上正等菩提智見圓滿。 此中菩薩略有四行,當知名觀。 謂即四行止道前行,於一切法遠離增益不正執邊,遠離損減不正執邊,及與隨順無量諸法,差別安立理趣妙觀。 由此四行,是諸菩薩觀道運轉,漸次乃至能證無上正等菩提智見圓滿。 是名略說菩薩止觀。 云何菩薩方便善巧? 當知略說有十二種。 依內修證一切佛法,有其六種;依外成熟一切有情,亦有六種。 云何依內修證一切佛法六種方便善巧? 一者、菩薩於諸有情悲心俱行,顧戀不捨;二者、菩薩於一切行如實遍知;三者、菩薩恒於無上正等菩提所有妙智,深心欣樂;四者、菩薩顧戀有情為依止故,不捨生死;五者、菩薩於一切行如實遍知為依止故,輪轉生死而心不染;六者、菩薩欣樂佛智為依止故,熾然精進。 當知是名菩薩依內修證一切佛法六種方便善巧。 云何依外成熟一切有情六種方便善巧? 一者、菩薩方便善巧,能令有情以少善根感無量果;二者、菩薩方便善巧,能令有情少用功力,引攝廣大無量善根;三者、菩薩方便善巧,於佛聖教憎背有情,除其恚惱;四者、菩薩方便善巧,於佛聖教處中有情,令其趣入;五者、菩薩方便善巧,於佛聖教已趣入者,令其成熟;六者、菩薩方便善巧,於佛聖教已成熟者,令得解脫。 云何菩薩方便善巧,令諸有情以少善根感無量果? 謂諸菩薩方便善巧,勸諸有情捨微劣物,乃至最下唯一麨團,施鄙穢田乃至蠢動傍生之類,作是施已,迴求無上正等菩提。 如是善根,物田雖下,由迴向力,感無量果。 云何菩薩方便善巧,令諸有情以少功力,引攝廣大無量善根? 謂諸菩薩方便善巧,若有信解受邪齋戒,乃至一月都不食等諸有情類,為說八支聖齋戒法,令其棄捨最極艱辛感非愛果受邪齋戒,勸令修學無極艱辛感大愛果受正齋戒。 若諸有情修自苦行,精勤無懈,起邪方便欲求解脫,為說中道,令離二邊,使其趣入。 若諸有情求欲生天,起邪方便,投巖、赴火、斷飲食等,為其宣說無倒靜慮,令彼獲於現法樂住,逮得當來無諸艱苦、與喜樂俱生天勝果。 若諸有情信婆羅門吠地迦呪,妄計精勤受持、讀誦得究竟淨,方便勸令於佛聖教受持、讀誦、思惟其義。 又正為他如是如是宣揚開示如來所說甚深空性相應妙法,令彼發生勇決厭離猛利淨信。 但由如是一剎那頃厭離淨信俱行善心,尚能攝受不可稱數廣大善根,況其相續。 又諸菩薩,世間所有種種上妙珍寶、香鬘、諸供養具,起淨信俱增上意樂,於佛法僧勝解供養,亦勸導他令行如是勝解供養。 又於十方一切世界,一切供養佛法僧所,即以如是淨信俱行增上意樂,周匝普緣,深生隨喜,亦勸導他作是隨喜。 又諸菩薩,恒常修習念佛、念法,乃至念天,亦勸導他令修六念。 又諸菩薩,意言分別禮佛法僧,乃至命終時無虛度,亦勸導他行此禮業。 又諸菩薩,普於十方一切有情一切福業悉皆隨喜,亦勸導他作是隨喜。 又諸菩薩,普於十方一切有情,入廣大悲增上意樂,願以自身皆代彼受一切憂苦,亦勸導他興此悲願。 又諸菩薩,過去現在一切誤失、一切違犯,以淨調柔愛樂隨順所學戒心,想對十方佛世尊所,至誠發露,悔往修來,亦勸導他令行是事。 如是數數發露所犯,少用功力,一切業障皆得解脫。 又諸菩薩,已具神通得心自在,普於十方佛法僧所及有情處,化作眾多種種化事,攝受無量大福德聚。 又諸菩薩,恒常修習慈、悲、喜、捨,亦勸導他作此修習。 如是菩薩以少功力,引攝廣大無量善根諸勝妙果。 云何菩薩方便善巧,於佛聖教憎背有情,除其恚惱;處中住者,令其趣入;已趣入者,令其成熟;已成熟者,令得解脫? 謂諸菩薩,為欲成辦如是四種有情義利,當知略說復有六種方便善巧。 一者、隨順會通方便善巧,二者、共立要契方便善巧,三者、異分意樂方便善巧,四者、逼迫所生方便善巧,五者、施恩報恩方便善巧,六者、究竟清淨方便善巧。 云何菩薩隨順會通方便善巧? 謂諸菩薩,於彼有情將為說法,先當方便隨順現行軟美身語,亦復現行近施隨轉,除彼於己所生恚惱;彼恚惱除,便生愛敬。 愛敬生已,於法起樂;然後為其宣說正法。 所說正法,如其所宜,易入易解,應時漸次,無有顛倒,能引義利,堪任難擊。 於彼有情調伏事中,成就最勝欲作饒益哀愍之心,為現神通、記心、顯說如理正法。 或勸請他,或為化作種種眾多殊特化事,令彼有情皆悉調伏。 若引義利極略諸論,能為廣辯;若引義利極廣諸論,能為略說,令其受持。 為作憶念,施其問難。 彼既於法能受能持,復進為其廣開正義。 又於趣入遍緣一切三摩地門,能為隨順教授教誡,攝益有情令修利行。 若諸有情,於佛所說甚深空性相應經典,不解如來密意義趣。 於此經中,說一切法皆無自性、皆無有事、無生無滅,說一切法皆等虛空、皆如幻夢。 彼聞是已,如其義趣不能解了,心生驚怖,誹謗如是一切經典,言非佛說。 菩薩為彼諸有情類,方便善巧如理會通,如是經中如來密意甚深義趣,如實和會,攝彼有情。 菩薩如是正會通時,為彼說言:此經不說一切諸法都無所有,但說諸法所言自性都無所有。 是故說言一切諸法皆無自性。 雖有一切所言說事,依止彼故諸言說轉,然彼所說可說自性,據第一義非其自性。 是故說言一切諸法皆無有事。 一切諸法所言自性,理既如是從本已來都無所有,當何所生、當何所滅。 是故說言一切諸法無生無滅。 譬如空中有眾多色、色業可得,容受一切諸色、色業。 謂虛空中,現有種種若往、若來、若住,起墮屈伸等事。 若於爾時,諸色、色業皆悉除遣;即於爾時,唯無色性清淨虛空其相顯現。 如是即於相似虛空離言說事,有其種種言說所作邪想分別隨戲論著,似色業轉。 又即如是一切言說邪想分別隨戲論著似眾色業,皆是似空離言說事之所容受。 若時菩薩以妙聖智,遣除一切言說所起邪想分別隨戲論著;爾時菩薩最勝聖者,以妙聖智證得諸法離言說事,唯有一切言說自性非性所顯,譬如虛空清淨相現。 亦非過此有餘自性應更尋求。 是故宣說一切諸法皆等虛空。 又如幻夢,非如顯現如實是有,亦非一切幻夢形質都無所有。 如是諸法,非如愚夫言說串習勢力所現如實是有,亦非一切諸法勝義離言自性都無所有。 由此方便悟入道理,一切諸法非有非無,猶如幻夢,其性無二。 是故宣說一切諸法皆如幻夢。 如是菩薩,普於一切諸法法界不取少分、不捨少分、不作損減、不作增益、無所失壞。 若法實有,知為實有;若法實無,知為實無;如其所知,如是開示。 當知是名菩薩隨順會通方便善巧。 云何菩薩共立要契方便善巧? 謂諸菩薩,若見有情求飲食等十資身具,即便共彼立要契言:汝等若能知父母恩,恭敬供養,及諸沙門婆羅門等,廣說如前,乃至若能受持淨戒;如是我當隨汝所欲,施飲食等諸資身具,如其不能,我不施汝。 如是菩薩,若見有情來求種種田事、宅事、諸闤闠事、王事、域事、財事、穀事,或有來求諸工業處及諸明處,或有來求共為朋友,或有來求共結婚媾,或有來求共作邑會,或有來求助營事業,菩薩共彼立要契言:汝等若能知父母恩,恭敬供養,如前廣說:如是我當施汝田宅,廣說乃至助營事業。 又諸菩薩,若見有情有諸愆犯,或被舉訟;或作種種不饒益事,為他所拘,將欲刑縛、斷截、撾打、毀辱、迫脅、驅擯、流移;或他所執,欲捶、縛、賣。 菩薩爾時隨能隨力立要契言:汝等若能知父母恩,恭敬供養,如前廣說;如是我當方便救汝,令脫斯難。 又諸菩薩,若見有情遭遇種種王賊、水火、人及非人、不活、惡名諸怖畏等,爾時菩薩立要契言:汝等若能知父母恩,恭敬供養,如前廣說;如是我當方便救汝,令免斯畏。 又諸菩薩,若見有情欲所愛會,求非愛離,爾時菩薩立要契言:汝等若能知父母恩,恭敬供養,如前廣說;如是我當遂汝所願,令所愛會及非愛離。 又諸菩薩,若見有情為疾所苦,立要契言:汝等若能知父母恩,恭敬供養,如前廣說;如是我當救汝病苦,令得安樂。 彼諸有情,既為菩薩如是立要,於諸善品速疾受學,於諸惡品速疾除斷,菩薩皆能遂其所願。 當知是名菩薩共立要契方便善巧。 云何菩薩異分意樂方便善巧? 謂諸菩薩與諸有情立要契已,彼諸有情於上所說彼彼事中,不如所欲速疾修行,菩薩爾時於如上說彼所求事,皆不施與。 唯為利益彼有情故,非餘意樂而不施彼。 如是於其諸厄難處、諸怖畏處、欲所愛會、求非愛離、病苦所惱諸有情類,權時棄捨。 唯為利益彼有情故,非異意樂而棄捨之、非異意樂而不救拔。 如是菩薩,於諸有情方便現行剛捍業時,唯為利益,非餘意樂。 漸令餘時如其所欲,斷除諸惡,修學諸善,是故方便權時棄捨。 若諸有情於菩薩所,雖無所求,亦無眾難,廣說乃至無諸病苦,而與菩薩先為親厚。 菩薩於彼隨宜勸導,斷諸惡法,修諸善法。 所謂令彼知父母恩,恭敬供養,廣說乃至於淨尸羅隨順受學。 若彼有情雖蒙菩薩如是勸導,故肆輕躁而不奉行,菩薩爾時自現憤責,唯欲利益,非憤意樂。 於諸所作悉現乖背,唯為利益,非背意樂。 或於一類,現與世間不饒益事,唯為利益,非損意樂。 如是菩薩,於諸有情現外所作,與內意樂相不同分;由是因緣,方便安處,令彼有情漸斷諸惡、漸修諸善。 是故菩薩如是調伏有情方便,名為菩薩異分意樂方便善巧。 云何菩薩逼迫所生方便善巧? 謂諸菩薩,或為家主、或作國王,得增上力,於自親屬、於自臣民能正教誡。 如應告言:諸我親屬、諸我臣民,若於父母不知恩報,廣說乃至毀犯戒者,我當斷其常所給賜衣服、飲食,或當捶罰,或我親屬當與乖離,或我臣民當永驅擯。 立一善巧機捷士夫,於彼事業常令伺察。 由是因故,彼諸有情怖畏治罰,勤斷諸惡,勤修諸善。 彼於修善雖無樂欲,由是方便,強逼令修。 是故名為逼迫所生方便善巧。 云何菩薩施恩報恩方便善巧? 謂諸菩薩,先於有情隨力多少施作恩惠;或施所須,或濟厄難,或除恐怖,或會所愛,或離非愛,或療病苦,令得安樂。 彼諸有情深知恩惠,欲報德者,菩薩爾時勸令修善,以受報恩。 告言:汝等非餘世財來相酬遺,為大報恩;汝等若能知父母恩,恭敬供養,廣說乃至受持淨戒,如是乃名大報恩德。 菩薩如是於諸有情先施恩惠,勸讚修善名大報恩;由此方便,令他於善精勤修學。 是故名為施恩報恩方便善巧。 云何菩薩究竟清淨方便善巧? 謂諸菩薩,安住菩薩到究竟地,於菩薩道已善清淨,先現往生覩史多天眾同分中。 無量有情如是念言:某名菩薩,今已生處覩史多天眾同分中,不久當下生贍部洲,證得無上正等菩提。 願令我等當得值遇,非不值遇,隨是菩薩所生之處,願令我等亦當往生。 如是為令無量有情生正欲樂,為多修習此欲樂故。 又是菩薩,從覩史多天眾中沒,來下人間,生於高貴、或族望家。 所謂王家、若國師家。 棄捨世間上妙欲樂,無所顧戀,清淨出家。 令諸有情起尊敬故。 又現誓受難行苦行。 為令信解苦行有情捨所樂故。 又證無上正等菩提。 令餘有情,於所同趣菩提解脫欣殊勝故。 又證無上正等覺已,未為有情即說正法,待梵天王躬來啟請。 為諸有情於正法所起尊敬故。 作是念言:當所說法定應殊妙,故今梵王悕望世尊說是法故,躬自來請。 又以佛眼觀察世間,勿使有情作如是謗:但由梵王躬來啟請,敬梵王故,宣說正法,非於有情自起悲心;乃是為他之所激發,非自能了機宜可否。 為欲壞彼一類有情如是邪執,先以佛眼觀察世間,然後為轉無上法輪,一切世間所未曾轉。 如是更復宣說正法,制立學處。 是名菩薩究竟清淨方便善巧。 由此所說方便善巧,更無有餘方便善巧,在於此上若過若妙,是故說名究竟清淨。 如是菩薩所說六種若略若廣方便善巧,能除憎背聖教有情所有恚惱;處中住者,令其趣入;已趣入者,令其成熟;已成熟者,令得解脫。 除此無有若過若增。 是名菩薩方便善巧。 云何菩薩妙陀羅尼? 當知如是妙陀羅尼略有四種。 一者、法陀羅尼,二者、義陀羅尼,三者、呪陀羅尼,四者、能得菩薩忍陀羅尼。 云何菩薩法陀羅尼? 謂諸菩薩獲得如是念慧力持,由此力持,聞未曾聞,言未溫習、未善通利,名句文身之所攝錄,次第錯綜、次第結集無量經典,經無量時能持不忘。 是名菩薩法陀羅尼。 云何菩薩義陀羅尼? 謂如前說。 此差別者,即於彼法無量義趣,心未溫習、未善通利,經無量時能持不忘。 是名菩薩義陀羅尼。 云何菩薩呪陀羅尼? 謂諸菩薩獲得如是等持自在,由此自在加被能除有情災患諸呪章句,令彼章句悉皆神驗,第一神驗,無所唐捐,能除非一種種災患。 是名菩薩呪陀羅尼。 云何菩薩能得菩薩忍陀羅尼? 謂諸菩薩成就自然堅固因行,具足妙慧。 獨處空閑,寂無言說,曾無有物,見路而行。 知量而食,不雜穢食,一類而食。 常極靜慮,於夜分中少眠多寤。 於佛所說得菩薩忍諸呪章句,能諦思惟。 其呪詞曰:壹胝蜜胝吉胝毘羼底鉢陀膩莎訶即於如是呪章句義,審諦、思惟、籌量、觀察。 彼於如是呪章句義如是正行,不從他聞,自然通達;了知如是諸呪章句都無有義,是圓成實,但唯無義;如實了知此章句義,所謂無義。 是故過此,不求餘義,齊此名為妙善通達呪章句義。 彼於如是呪章句義正通達已,即隨此義,不從他聞,自正通達一切法義。 謂於此義如是通達,一切言說所說諸法自性之義皆不成實,唯有諸法離言自性是自性義。 彼於諸法此自性義正通達已,過此、更無餘義可求。 由於此義善通達故,獲得最勝廣大歡喜。 由是菩薩得陀羅尼,當言已得此陀羅尼章句所立菩薩勝忍。 得此忍故,是諸菩薩不久當得淨勝意樂,已依上品勝解行地勝忍而轉。 當知是名菩薩所有能得菩薩忍陀羅尼。 此中菩薩法陀羅尼、義陀羅尼,若過第一無數大劫,已入清淨勝意樂地,所得決定堅住廣大。 從此以下,或以願力、或依靜慮,雖有獲得,而不決定,亦不堅住、亦不廣大。 如說法義二陀羅尼,呪陀羅尼,當知亦爾。 能得菩薩忍陀羅尼,如前所釋,即如是得。 若諸菩薩具四功德,方獲如是諸陀羅尼,非隨闕一。 何等名為四種功德? 一者、於諸欲中,無所貪著。 二者、於他勝事不生姤忌,不嫉他榮。 三者、一切所求等施無悔。 四者、於正法中,深生忻樂;忻樂法者,於菩薩藏及菩薩藏摩怛理迦深心愛樂。 云何菩薩所修正願? 當知此願略有五種。 一者、發心願,二者、受生願,三者、所行願,四者、正願,五者、大願。 若諸菩薩,於其無上正等菩提最初發心,是名發心願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來往生隨順饒益有情諸善趣中,是名受生願。 若諸菩薩,願能無倒思擇諸法,願於境界修無量等殊勝善法,是名所行願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來攝受一切菩薩善法,攝受一切所有功德。 若總若別所有正願,是名正願。 菩薩大願,當知即從正願所出。 此復十種。 若諸菩薩,願於當來以一切種上妙供具,供養無量無邊如來,當知是名第一大願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來攝受防護諸佛世尊所有正法,傳持法眼令無斷壞,當知是名第二正願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來從覩史多天宮降下,如前乃至入大涅槃,當知是名第三大願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來行一切種菩薩正行,當知是名第四大願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來普能成熟一切有情,當知是名第五大願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來一切世界皆能示現,當知是名第六大願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來普能淨修一切佛土,當知是名第七大願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來一切菩薩,皆同一種意樂加行趣入大乘,當知是名第八大願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來所有一切無倒加行皆不唐捐,當知是名第九大願。 若諸菩薩,願於當來速證無上正等菩提,當知是名第十大願。 云何菩薩空三摩地? 謂諸菩薩觀一切事,遠離一切言說自性,唯有諸法離言自性,心正安住。 是名菩薩空三摩地。 云何菩薩無願三摩地? 謂諸菩薩,即等隨觀離言自性所有諸事,由邪分別所起煩惱,及以眾苦所攝受故,皆為無量過失所污;於當來世不願為先,心正安住。 是名菩薩無願三摩地。 云何菩薩無相三摩地? 謂諸菩薩,即正思惟離言自性所有諸事,一切分別戲論眾相永滅寂靜,如實了知,心正安住。 是名菩薩無相三摩地。 問:何故唯立三三摩地,無過無增? 答:法有二種。 謂有、非有。 有為、無為名之為有,我及我所名為非有。 於有為中,有無願故,可厭逆故,當知依此建立無願三摩地。 於無為中,願涅槃故,正樂攝故,當知依此建立無相三摩地。 於非有事,菩薩不願,亦無無願。 然於非有,菩薩如實見為非有。 依此見故,當知建立空三摩地。 如是菩薩於此三種三摩地中精勤修學,於是建立如實了知。 於餘行相三三摩地如實悟入,安立理趣如實悟入,修習理趣如實了知。 謂於其中,諸聲聞眾精勤修學及圓滿證。 本地分中菩薩地第十五初持瑜伽處菩提分品第十七之三復有四種法嗢拕南,諸佛菩薩欲令有情清淨故說。 何等為四? 一切諸行皆是無常,是名第一法嗢拕南。 一切諸行皆悉是苦,是名第二法嗢拕南。 一切諸法皆無有我,是名第三法嗢拕南。 涅槃寂靜,是名第四法嗢拕南。 諸佛菩薩多為有情宣說如是法相應義,是故說名法嗢拕南。 又從曩昔,其心寂靜諸牟尼尊,於一切時展轉宣說,是故說此名嗢拕南。 又此行迹能趣大生,亦復能趣出第一有,是故說此名嗢拕南。 云何菩薩等隨觀察一切諸行皆是無常? 謂諸菩薩,觀一切行言說自性,於一切時常無所有。 如是諸行常不可得,故名無常。 又即觀彼離言說事,由不了知彼真實故;無知為因,生滅可得。 如是諸行離言自性有生有滅,故名無常。 又諸菩薩,觀過去行已生已滅,由彼諸行無因可得,亦無自性,是故觀彼因性、自性皆無所有。 觀現在行已生未滅,由彼諸行因不可得,已與果故;自性可得,猶未滅故;是故觀彼自性是有,而無有因。 觀未來行未生未滅,由彼諸行有因可得,未與果故;無有自性,猶未生故;是故觀彼唯有因性,而無自性。 菩薩如是見三世中分段諸行相續轉已,等隨觀見一一剎那有為諸行,皆有三種有為之相。 於剎那後,復有第四有為之相。 即於此中,前剎那行自性滅壞。 無間非先諸行剎那自性生起。 正觀為生;諸行生已,即時未壞,正觀為住;此已生行,望前已滅諸行剎那自性別異,正觀為老;從此諸行生剎那後,即此已生諸行剎那自性滅壞,正觀為滅。 菩薩觀此已生剎那諸行自性,即是生住老之自性,不見生等別有自性。 如實觀見生剎那後,即此生等諸行剎那自性滅壞,無別有性。 如是四種有為之相,總攝諸行。 以要言之,二分所顯。 一者、有分所顯。 二者、無分所顯。 此中世尊依於有分,建立一種有為之相;依於無分,建立第二有為之相。 住、異二種,俱是諸行有分所顯,建立第三有為之相。 此中菩薩,觀一切時唯有諸行,除此更無生住老滅恒有實物自性成就。 何以故? 諸行生時,唯即如是諸行可得,無別有餘生住老滅。 如是諸行住老滅時,唯即如是諸行可得,無別有餘生住老滅。 又諸菩薩以理推求生等實物亦不可得。 如是推求不可得者,謂若離彼色等諸行別有生法,是即應如色等諸行自體有生。 如是此生亦應有生。 如是即應有二種生,一者、行生,二者、生生。 如是行生與彼生生為一為異? 若言一者,計生實有即為唐捐。 言別有生是實物有,不應道理。 若言異者,如是即應非行生生;是行生生,不應道理。 如說生相,如是廣說住老滅相,當知亦爾。 謂若滅法別有自性,是實成就;即應此滅有生有滅。 若滅生時,一切諸行皆應同滅。 如是即應少用功力,如入滅定,諸心心所一切皆滅。 若滅滅時,一切諸行雖皆已滅,復應還生,以滅無故。 是故言滅有生有滅,不應道理。 又善男子、或善女人,於一切時恒有實物自性成就,觀為假有,而能修厭、離欲、解脫,不應道理。 與此相違,是應道理。 由此行相,是諸菩薩如實了知一切諸行皆是無常。 又諸菩薩,觀無常行相續轉時,能為三種苦所依止。 一者、行苦,二者、壞苦,三者、苦苦。 如是菩薩如實了知一切諸行皆悉是苦。 又諸菩薩,如實了知有為、無為一切諸法二無我性。 一者、補特伽羅無我性,二者、法無我性。 於諸法中補特伽羅無我性者,謂非即有法,是真實有補特伽羅;亦非離有法,別有真實補特伽羅。 於諸法中法無我性者,謂於一切言說事中,一切言說自性諸法都無所有。 如是菩薩如實了知一切諸法皆無有我。 又諸菩薩,觀一切行先因永斷,後無餘滅,其餘畢竟不起不生,說名涅槃。 當知涅槃其體寂靜,一切眾苦畢竟息故,一切煩惱究竟滅故。 如是未得清淨增上意樂菩薩,未見聖諦諸聲聞乘,雖於涅槃發起勝解,如是說言涅槃寂靜;而於涅槃未如實解,未能如實正智見轉,然彼亦有如理作意。 譬如王子、或長者子,生育已來,未出王宮、長者內室;王及長者,各為幼童假作種種諸戲樂具,鹿車、牛車、馬車、象車而賜與之。 爾時王子及長者子,用為嬉戲,歡娛遊佚,即於如是假所造作鹿、牛、馬、象,發起真實鹿想、牛想、馬想、象想。 後於一時,王及長者各知其子漸已長大,諸根成熟,讚說真實鹿、牛、馬、象。 爾時王子及長者子聞父讚說,作是念言:今者父王及父長者,將非讚說我等所有鹿、牛、馬、象四種車耶? 復於後時,王及長者知子轉大,從內宮室引出外遊,示其真實鹿、牛、馬、象。 時彼見已,內自發生如實慧解,此為實義鹿車、牛車、馬車、象車。 父於長夜甞為我等讚說斯事,然唯我等以無智故,於不如實唯彼相似、唯彼影像發起真實鹿等勝解。 由是因緣,於先勝解追起羞愧。 如是宮室,喻於生死。 其所生育諸幼童子,喻未證得清淨增上意樂菩薩,及未見諦諸聲聞乘。 父喻諸佛及已證入大地菩薩。 先為假作鹿、牛等車,喻為宣說涅槃鹿相。 次為讚說真實鹿等,喻佛菩薩自現證見真實涅槃,如其所見,於彼菩薩及聲聞前,讚說涅槃真實功德。 所餘,喻彼既聞是已,但用隨順音聲覺慧,於涅槃德長夜勝解。 若於是時資糧成熟,漸次增長,成淨增上意樂菩薩、見諦聲聞,於真涅槃生現證智;即於爾時發生自內如實慧解,如是涅槃,一切聲聞、獨覺所證,諸佛菩薩先所讚說,我等先以愚夫覺慧,於不如實唯彼相似、唯彼影像發起真實涅槃勝解。 由是因緣,於先勝解追生羞愧。 依止於後如實勝解。 又如病者往大醫所,為除病故,求隨順藥,得已常服。 彼於是藥深生勝解、深生愛樂、唯見為實。 由是因緣,先病除愈,復起餘病,應服餘藥。 爾時大醫知先病愈,後病復生,更須餘藥;勸捨前藥,令服餘藥。 時彼病者愚癡無識,於前所服深生勝解,起所宜想,不肯棄捨。 時大良醫為其宣說前後藥性,於現所病前藥匪宜,後藥為勝。 時有病者雖聞是語,不生勝解,猶未深信良醫所言。 如是病者,喻諸凡夫、菩薩、聲聞,為煩惱病之所執持。 大良醫者,喻諸如來。 其良藥等,喻為宣說若上上勝及以上極,若深深勝及以深極,若劣、若勝及以勝極,法教正教教授教誡。 彼雖聞已,不能悟入,不生勝解,不能修行法隨法行。 諸有淨信菩薩、聲聞,於佛所說不生疑惑;乘佛所說喻如一切支具圓滿妙莊嚴車無上法乘,如善御者,隨所行地、隨所應到,疾疾進趣,無所稽留。
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
十、止觀
這當中,菩薩就於諸法無所分別,當知名為止。若於諸法勝義理趣的如實真智,及於無量安立理趣的世俗妙智,當知名為觀。
這當中,菩薩略有四行,當知名為止:一,勝義世俗智的前行;二,勝義世俗智的果;三,普於一切戲論之想中無功用而轉;四,就於如是離言唯事,由於無有相、無所分別,其心寂靜,趣向一切法的平等性、一味實性。由此四行,諸菩薩的止道運轉,漸次乃至能證無上正等菩提智見圓滿。
這當中,菩薩略有四行,當知名為觀:即彼四行止道的前行,與於一切法遠離「增益」的不正執邊、遠離「損減」的不正執邊,以及隨順無量諸法差別安立理趣的妙觀。由此四行,諸菩薩的觀道運轉,漸次乃至能證無上正等菩提智見圓滿。是名略說菩薩止觀。
十一、方便善巧
什麼是菩薩的方便善巧?當知略說有十二種:依內修證一切佛法,有六種;依外成熟一切有情,也有六種。
依內六種
什麼是依內修證一切佛法的六種方便善巧?一者,菩薩於諸有情與悲心俱行,顧戀不捨;二者,菩薩於一切行如實遍知;三者,菩薩恒於無上正等菩提的所有妙智深心欣樂;四者,菩薩以顧戀有情為依止故,不捨生死;五者,菩薩以於一切行如實遍知為依止故,輪轉生死而心不染;六者,菩薩以欣樂佛智為依止故,熾然精進。當知是名菩薩依內修證一切佛法的六種方便善巧。
依外六種總標
什麼是依外成熟一切有情的六種方便善巧?一者,菩薩方便善巧,能令有情以少善根感無量果;二者,能令有情少用功力,引攝廣大無量善根;三者,於佛聖教憎背的有情,除其恚惱;四者,於佛聖教處中的有情,令其趣入;五者,於佛聖教已趣入者,令其成熟;六者,於佛聖教已成熟者,令得解脫。
少善根感無量果
什麼是菩薩方便善巧,令諸有情以少善根感無量果?謂諸菩薩方便善巧,勸諸有情捨微劣之物——乃至最下只是一團麨食——施給鄙穢之田,乃至蠢動傍生之類;作此布施之後,迴向希求無上正等菩提。如是善根,所施之物與所施之田雖然低下,由迴向力故,感無量果。
少功力引廣大善根
什麼是菩薩方便善巧,令諸有情以少功力引攝廣大無量善根?謂諸菩薩方便善巧:若有信解而受邪齋戒、乃至一整月都不進食等的有情,為他們宣說八支聖齋戒法,令其棄捨最極艱辛而感非愛果的邪齋戒,勸令修學不極艱辛而感大愛果的正齋戒。若諸有情修自苦行,精勤無懈,起邪方便想求解脫,為說中道,令離二邊,使其趣入。若諸有情求想生天,起邪方便——投巖、赴火、斷飲食等——為其宣說無倒的靜慮,令他獲得現法樂住,逮得當來沒有諸艱苦、與喜樂俱起的生天勝果。若諸有情信婆羅門的吠地迦呪,妄計精勤受持、讀誦便得究竟清淨,方便勸令於佛聖教受持、讀誦、思惟其義。
又正為他人如是如是宣揚開示如來所說甚深空性相應的妙法,令他發生勇決厭離、猛利淨信——僅由這樣一剎那頃與厭離淨信俱行的善心,尚能攝受不可稱數的廣大善根,何況相續不斷。
又諸菩薩,以世間所有種種上妙珍寶、香鬘、諸供養具,起與淨信俱的增上意樂,於佛法僧作勝解供養,也勸導他人行如是勝解供養。又於十方一切世界一切供養佛法僧之所,即以如是與淨信俱行的增上意樂,周匝普緣,深生隨喜,也勸導他人作此隨喜。又諸菩薩恒常修習念佛、念法,乃至念天,也勸導他人令修六念。又諸菩薩,以意言分別禮敬佛法僧,乃至命終,時無虛度,也勸導他人行此禮業。又諸菩薩,普於十方一切有情的一切福業悉皆隨喜,也勸導他人作此隨喜。又諸菩薩,普於十方一切有情,入廣大悲增上意樂,願以自身皆代他們承受一切憂苦,也勸導他人興此悲願。又諸菩薩,對過去現在的一切誤失、一切違犯,以清淨調柔、愛樂隨順所學戒之心,觀想面對十方佛世尊之所,至誠發露,悔往修來,也勸導他人行此事——如是數數發露所犯,少用功力,一切業障皆得解脫。又諸菩薩,已具神通、得心自在,普於十方佛法僧所及有情之處,化作眾多種種化事,攝受無量大福德聚。又諸菩薩恒常修習慈悲喜捨,也勸導他人作此修習。如是菩薩以少功力,引攝廣大無量善根諸勝妙果。
六種方便善巧總標
什麼是菩薩方便善巧,於佛聖教憎背的有情除其恚惱、處中住者令其趣入、已趣入者令其成熟、已成熟者令得解脫?謂諸菩薩,為了成辦如是四種有情義利,當知略說又有六種方便善巧:一者隨順會通方便善巧,二者共立要契方便善巧,三者異分意樂方便善巧,四者逼迫所生方便善巧,五者施恩報恩方便善巧,六者究竟清淨方便善巧。
隨順會通
什麼是菩薩的隨順會通方便善巧?謂諸菩薩,將為那些有情說法之前,先當方便隨順,現行柔軟美好的身語,也現行近施隨轉,除去他對自己所生的恚惱;恚惱除了,便生愛敬;愛敬生了,於法起樂;然後為他宣說正法。所說的正法,如其所宜,易入易解,應時漸次,無有顛倒,能引義利,經得起質難。於彼有情的調伏事中,成就最勝的欲作饒益哀愍之心,為現神通、記心(知他心念)、顯說如理正法;或勸請他人,或為化作種種眾多殊特化事,令彼有情皆悉調伏。若能引義利的極簡略諸論,能為廣辯;若能引義利的極廣諸論,能為略說,令其受持。為作憶念,施其問難。他既於法能受能持,再進一步為他廣開正義。又於趣入遍緣一切三摩地門,能為隨順的教授教誡,攝益有情令修利行。
若諸有情,於佛所說甚深空性相應的經典,不解如來的密意義趣——這些經中說一切法皆無自性、皆無有事、無生無滅,說一切法皆等虛空、皆如幻夢——他們聽了之後,不能按其義趣解了,心生驚怖,誹謗如是一切經典,說不是佛說的。菩薩為這類有情,方便善巧如理會通,把這些經中如來密意的甚深義趣如實和會,攝受彼有情。
菩薩如是正會通時,為他們說:這經不是說一切諸法都無所有,而是說諸法「所言自性」都無所有——所以說「一切諸法皆無自性」。雖有一切所言說之事,依止於它,諸言說才得以運轉;然而它被說出的「可說自性」,就第一義而言,並非它的自性——所以說「一切諸法皆無有事」。一切諸法的所言自性,道理既是如此、從本以來都無所有,那有什麼可生、有什麼可滅?——所以說「一切諸法無生無滅」。
譬如空中有眾多色與色業可得,虛空容受一切諸色、色業——虛空之中,現有種種或往、或來、或住、起、墮、屈、伸等事;若在那時把諸色、色業全部除遣,即於那時,唯有無色性的清淨虛空其相顯現。同樣地,就於這相似虛空的離言說事上,有種種言說所作的邪想分別、隨戲論而執著,如色業般運轉;而這一切言說邪想分別隨戲論著的似眾色業,皆為似空的離言說事所容受。若時菩薩以妙聖智遣除一切由言說所起的邪想分別隨戲論著,那時菩薩最勝聖者以妙聖智證得諸法的離言說事——唯有「一切言說自性非性」所顯——譬如虛空清淨相現;也並非超過此外還有其餘自性應更尋求。所以宣說「一切諸法皆等虛空」。
又如幻與夢,並非如其顯現那樣如實是有,也不是一切幻夢的形質都無所有。同樣地,諸法並非如愚夫言說串習勢力所顯現那樣如實是有,也不是一切諸法的勝義離言自性都無所有。由此方便悟入的道理,一切諸法非有非無,猶如幻夢,其性無二——所以宣說「一切諸法皆如幻夢」。
如是菩薩,普於一切諸法法界,不取少分、不捨少分,不作損減、不作增益,無所失壞:若法實有,知為實有;若法實無,知為實無;如其所知,如是開示。當知是名菩薩隨順會通方便善巧。
共立要契
什麼是菩薩的共立要契方便善巧?謂諸菩薩,若見有情來求飲食等十種資身之具,便與他共立要契(約定)說:你們若能知父母恩、恭敬供養,及於諸沙門婆羅門等(如前廣說),乃至若能受持淨戒——這樣我就隨你所欲,施給飲食等諸資身具;如其不能,我就不施給你。如是菩薩,若見有情來求種種田事、宅事、諸闤闠(市場)事、王事、域事、財事、穀事,或有來求諸工業處及諸明處,或有來求共為朋友,或有來求共結婚媾,或有來求共作邑會,或有來求助營事業,菩薩與他立要契說:你們若能知父母恩、恭敬供養(如前廣說)——這樣我就施你田宅,廣說乃至助營事業。
又諸菩薩,若見有情有諸愆犯、或被舉發訴訟,或作種種不饒益事而為他人所拘,將要被刑縛、斷截、撾打、毀辱、迫脅、驅擯、流放;或被他人所執,將要被捶、縛、賣。菩薩那時隨能隨力立要契說:你們若能知父母恩、恭敬供養(如前廣說)——這樣我就方便救你,令你脫離此難。又諸菩薩,若見有情遭遇種種王、賊、水、火、人及非人、不活、惡名等怖畏,那時菩薩立要契說:你們若能知父母恩、恭敬供養(如前廣說)——這樣我就方便救你,令你免於此畏。又諸菩薩,若見有情想與所愛者相會、求與非愛者相離,那時菩薩立要契說:你們若能知父母恩、恭敬供養(如前廣說)——這樣我就遂你所願,令所愛相會、非愛相離。又諸菩薩,若見有情為疾病所苦,立要契說:你們若能知父母恩、恭敬供養(如前廣說)——這樣我就救你的病苦,令得安樂。
那些有情,既被菩薩如此立要,於諸善品速疾受學,於諸惡品速疾除斷;菩薩皆能遂其所願。當知是名菩薩共立要契方便善巧。
異分意樂
什麼是菩薩的異分意樂方便善巧?謂諸菩薩與諸有情立要契之後,那些有情於上面所說的種種事中,不如其所欲速疾修行,菩薩那時對上面所說他所求的事,皆不施與——唯獨為了利益那有情的緣故,不是出於別的意樂而不施給他。同樣地,對處於諸厄難處、諸怖畏處、欲求所愛相會、求非愛相離、為病苦所惱的諸有情類,權且暫時捨置——唯獨為了利益那有情的緣故,不是出於異心而捨置、不是出於異心而不救拔。如是菩薩,對諸有情方便現行剛硬強悍之業時,唯為利益,非出於其餘意樂;漸漸令他在別的時候如其所欲,斷除諸惡、修學諸善——所以方便權時捨置。
若諸有情對菩薩雖無所求,也無眾難(廣說乃至無諸病苦),而與菩薩先有親厚交情,菩薩對他隨宜勸導,斷諸惡法、修諸善法——即令他知父母恩、恭敬供養,廣說乃至於淨尸羅隨順受學。若那有情雖蒙菩薩如此勸導,仍故意輕率放肆而不奉行,菩薩那時外現憤怒責備之相——唯欲利益,非出於憤怒的意樂;於諸所作全都表現出乖違背離——唯為利益,非出於背棄的意樂;或對某一類人,現行世間不饒益之事——唯為利益,非出於損害的意樂。如是菩薩,對諸有情外現的所作,與內心的意樂相不同分(外相與內心不一致);由此因緣,方便安置,令彼有情漸斷諸惡、漸修諸善。所以菩薩這種調伏有情的方便,名為菩薩異分意樂方便善巧。
逼迫所生
什麼是菩薩的逼迫所生方便善巧?謂諸菩薩,或為家主、或作國王,得增上力,於自己的親屬、自己的臣民能正教誡。如應告言:「我的諸親屬、我的諸臣民,若於父母不知恩報,廣說乃至毀犯戒的,我當斷絕他常所給賜的衣服、飲食,或當捶罰,或者我的親屬將與他乖離,或者我的臣民將被永遠驅擯。」又設立一位善巧機敏快捷的士夫,常令他伺察那些事情。由此之故,那些有情怖畏治罰,勤斷諸惡、勤修諸善。他們於修善雖無樂欲,由此方便,強逼令修。是故名為逼迫所生方便善巧。
施恩報恩
什麼是菩薩的施恩報恩方便善巧?謂諸菩薩,先對有情隨力多少施作恩惠:或施其所須,或濟其厄難,或除其恐怖,或令會所愛,或令離非愛,或療其病苦,令得安樂。那些有情深知恩惠,想要報德時,菩薩那時勸令修善,以此接受報恩。告言:「你們不必以別的世間財物來相酬謝,才算大報恩;你們若能知父母恩、恭敬供養,廣說乃至受持淨戒——這樣才名為大大地報答恩德。」菩薩如是先對諸有情施恩惠,再勸讚「修善即是大報恩」;由此方便,令他於善精勤修學。是故名為施恩報恩方便善巧。
究竟清淨
什麼是菩薩的究竟清淨方便善巧?謂諸菩薩,安住於菩薩到究竟地,於菩薩道已善清淨,先示現往生於覩史多天的眾同分中。無量有情如是念言:「某某菩薩,如今已生於覩史多天眾同分中,不久當下生贍部洲,證得無上正等菩提。願令我等能得值遇、不要錯過;隨這位菩薩所生之處,願令我等也能往生。」如是為令無量有情生起正欲樂、為了多多修習此欲樂故。
又這位菩薩,從覩史多天眾中沒,來下人間,生於高貴或族望之家——所謂王家、或國師家——棄捨世間上妙欲樂,無所顧戀,清淨出家:為令諸有情生起尊敬故。又示現誓受難行苦行:為令信解苦行的有情捨其所樂故。又證無上正等菩提:令其餘有情於同趣的菩提解脫生起殊勝欣樂故。又證無上正等覺之後,不立即為有情說正法,等待梵天王親自來啟請:為令諸有情於正法生起尊敬故——他們會這樣想:「將要說的法必定殊妙,所以現在梵王悕望世尊說此法,親自來請。」又以佛眼觀察世間——不使有情作如是毀謗:「只因梵王親自來請、敬重梵王之故才宣說正法,不是對有情自起悲心;是被他人所激發,不是自己能了知機宜可否。」為了破除那一類有情的如是邪執,先以佛眼觀察世間,然後為轉無上法輪——一切世間所未曾轉。如是又再宣說正法、制立學處。是名菩薩究竟清淨方便善巧。由這裡所說的方便善巧,再沒有其餘的方便善巧在此之上更超過、更妙——是故說名究竟清淨。
如是菩薩所說的六種或略或廣的方便善巧,能除憎背聖教有情的所有恚惱;處中住者,令其趣入;已趣入者,令其成熟;已成熟者,令得解脫。除此之外沒有更過、更增的了。是名菩薩方便善巧。
十二、妙陀羅尼
什麼是菩薩的妙陀羅尼?當知如是妙陀羅尼略有四種:一者法陀羅尼,二者義陀羅尼,三者呪陀羅尼,四者能得菩薩忍陀羅尼。
什麼是菩薩的法陀羅尼?謂諸菩薩獲得如是念與慧的力持,由此力持,對聽聞所未曾聞、言語未經溫習、未善通利、為名句文身所攝錄、次第錯綜、次第結集的無量經典,經無量時能持不忘。是名菩薩法陀羅尼。
什麼是菩薩的義陀羅尼?謂如前說;差別在於:即於彼法的無量義趣,心未溫習、未善通利,經無量時能持不忘。是名菩薩義陀羅尼。
什麼是菩薩的呪陀羅尼?謂諸菩薩獲得如是等持自在,由此自在加被那些能除有情災患的呪章句,令彼章句悉皆神驗、第一神驗,無所唐捐,能除不只一種的種種災患。是名菩薩呪陀羅尼。
什麼是菩薩的能得菩薩忍陀羅尼?謂諸菩薩成就自然堅固的因行,具足妙慧;獨處空閑,寂無言說,曾無一物,見路而行;知量而食,不雜穢食,一類而食;常極靜慮,於夜分中少眠多寤;於佛所說能得菩薩忍的諸呪章句,能諦實思惟。其呪詞曰:壹胝蜜胝吉胝毘羼底鉢陀膩莎訶。就於如是呪章句之義,審諦、思惟、籌量、觀察。他對如是呪章句義如是正行時,不從他聞、自然通達:了知如是諸呪章句都無有義,是圓成實,但唯無義;如實了知此章句之義,就是「無義」。是故過此之外,不求餘義——到此名為妙善通達呪章句義。
他對如是呪章句義正通達之後,即隨此義,不從他聞,自正通達一切法義。謂於此義如是通達:一切言說所說諸法自性之義皆不成實,唯有諸法離言自性是自性義。他對諸法此自性義正通達已,過此更無餘義可求。由於此義善通達故,獲得最勝廣大歡喜。由是菩薩得陀羅尼,當說已得此陀羅尼章句所立的菩薩勝忍。得此忍故,是諸菩薩不久當得淨勝意樂,已依上品勝解行地的勝忍而轉。當知是名菩薩所有能得菩薩忍陀羅尼。
這當中,菩薩的法陀羅尼、義陀羅尼,若過第一無數大劫、已入清淨勝意樂地,所得的才決定、堅住、廣大;從此以下,或以願力、或依靜慮,雖有獲得,而不決定、不堅住、不廣大。如法義二陀羅尼所說,呪陀羅尼當知亦爾。能得菩薩忍陀羅尼,如前面所解釋的,即如是得。
若諸菩薩具四種功德,方獲得如是諸陀羅尼,缺一不可。哪四種功德?一者,於諸欲中無所貪著;二者,於他人的勝事不生姤忌、不嫉他榮;三者,一切所求等施無悔;四者,於正法中深生忻樂——忻樂法者,於菩薩藏及菩薩藏摩怛理迦(本母)深心愛樂。
十三、正願
什麼是菩薩所修的正願?當知此願略有五種:一者發心願,二者受生願,三者所行願,四者正願,五者大願。
若諸菩薩於無上正等菩提最初發心,是名發心願。若諸菩薩願於當來往生能隨順饒益有情的諸善趣中,是名受生願。若諸菩薩願能無倒思擇諸法、願於境界修無量等殊勝善法,是名所行願。若諸菩薩願於當來攝受一切菩薩善法、攝受一切所有功德——或總或別的所有正願,是名正願。菩薩大願,當知即從正願所出,這又有十種:
若諸菩薩,願於當來以一切種上妙供具供養無量無邊如來,當知是名第一大願。若諸菩薩,願於當來攝受防護諸佛世尊所有正法,傳持法眼令無斷壞,當知是名第二正願。若諸菩薩,願於當來從覩史多天宮降下,如前所說乃至入大涅槃,當知是名第三大願。若諸菩薩,願於當來行一切種菩薩正行,當知是名第四大願。若諸菩薩,願於當來普能成熟一切有情,當知是名第五大願。若諸菩薩,願於當來於一切世界皆能示現,當知是名第六大願。若諸菩薩,願於當來普能淨修一切佛土,當知是名第七大願。若諸菩薩,願於當來一切菩薩皆同一種意樂加行趣入大乘,當知是名第八大願。若諸菩薩,願於當來所有一切無倒加行皆不唐捐,當知是名第九大願。若諸菩薩,願於當來速證無上正等菩提,當知是名第十大願。
十四、三三摩地
什麼是菩薩的空三摩地?謂諸菩薩觀一切事,遠離一切言說自性,唯有諸法的離言自性,心正安住。是名菩薩空三摩地。
什麼是菩薩的無願三摩地?謂諸菩薩,即平等隨觀離言自性的所有諸事,由邪分別所起的煩惱及眾苦所攝受故,皆為無量過失所染污;於當來世以不願為先,心正安住。是名菩薩無願三摩地。
什麼是菩薩的無相三摩地?謂諸菩薩,即正思惟離言自性的所有諸事,一切分別戲論眾相永滅寂靜,如實了知,心正安住。是名菩薩無相三摩地。
問:為什麼唯立三種三摩地,無過無增?答:法有二種,謂有與非有。有為、無為名之為「有」;我及我所名為「非有」。於有為之中,有無願故、可厭逆故,當知依此建立無願三摩地。於無為之中,願涅槃故、正樂攝故,當知依此建立無相三摩地。於非有之事,菩薩不願、亦無無願;然而於非有,菩薩如實見為非有——依此見故,當知建立空三摩地。
如是菩薩於此三種三摩地中精勤修學,於此建立如實了知;於其餘行相的三三摩地如實悟入,於安立理趣如實悟入,於修習理趣如實了知——謂於其中,諸聲聞眾精勤修學及圓滿證得。
十五、四種法嗢拕南
(原典此處入卷界:本地分中菩薩地第十五初持瑜伽處菩提分品第十七之三)
復有四種法嗢拕南,諸佛菩薩為令有情清淨故說。哪四種?一切諸行皆是無常,是名第一法嗢拕南;一切諸行皆悉是苦,是名第二法嗢拕南;一切諸法皆無有我,是名第三法嗢拕南;涅槃寂靜,是名第四法嗢拕南。
諸佛菩薩多為有情宣說如是與法相應之義,是故說名法嗢拕南。又從往昔以來,其心寂靜的諸牟尼尊於一切時展轉宣說,是故說此名嗢拕南。又此行迹能趣大生,也能趣出第一有,是故說此名嗢拕南。
諸行無常
什麼是菩薩等隨觀察一切諸行皆是無常?謂諸菩薩,觀一切行的言說自性於一切時常無所有——如是諸行常不可得,故名無常。又觀彼離言說之事,由於不了知彼真實故,以無知為因,生滅可得——如是諸行的離言自性有生有滅,故名無常。
又諸菩薩,觀過去行已生已滅:由彼諸行無因可得,也無自性,是故觀彼因性、自性皆無所有。觀現在行已生未滅:由彼諸行因不可得(已與果故)、自性可得(猶未滅故),是故觀彼自性是有而無有因。觀未來行未生未滅:由彼諸行有因可得(未與果故)、無有自性(猶未生故),是故觀彼唯有因性而無自性。
菩薩如是見三世中分段諸行相續而轉之後,等隨觀見一一剎那的有為諸行皆有三種有為之相,於剎那之後又有第四有為之相。就於此中:前剎那行的自性滅壞,無間隔地,非先前諸行的剎那自性生起——正觀為「生」;諸行生已,即時未壞——正觀為「住」;此已生之行,望前已滅諸行的剎那自性有所別異——正觀為「老」;從此諸行生起的剎那之後,即此已生諸行的剎那自性滅壞——正觀為「滅」。
菩薩觀此已生剎那諸行的自性即是生、住、老的自性,不見生等別有自性;如實觀見生剎那之後,即此生等諸行的剎那自性滅壞,無別有性。如是四種有為之相總攝諸行,要言之,為二分所顯:一者有分所顯,二者無分所顯。此中世尊依於「有」分建立一種有為之相,依於「無」分建立第二有為之相;住、異二種俱是諸行「有」分所顯,建立第三有為之相。
此中菩薩觀一切時唯有諸行,除此更無「生住老滅」恒有實物、自性成就。為什麼?諸行生時,唯有如是諸行可得,無別有其餘的生住老滅;如是諸行住、老、滅時,唯有如是諸行可得,無別有其餘的生住老滅。
又諸菩薩以理推求,生等實物也不可得。如是推求不可得,是說:若離彼色等諸行別有「生」法,那就應該像色等諸行自體有生那樣,這個「生」也應有生;這樣就應有二種生——一者行生,二者生生。那麼行生與彼生生,是一還是異?若說是一,計「生」為實有就成了空話;說別有「生」是實物有,不應道理。若說是異,這樣就應成「非行生生」;而「是行生生」,不應道理。如說生相,如是廣說住、老、滅相,當知亦爾——若「滅」法別有自性、是實物成就,那此滅就應有生有滅;若滅生起之時,一切諸行皆應同滅,這樣就應該少用功力、如入滅定般,諸心心所一切皆滅;若「滅」滅了的時候,一切諸行雖皆已滅,又應該還生——因為「滅」已經沒有了。所以說「滅」有生有滅,不應道理。
又,善男子或善女人,若一切時恒有實物自性成就,卻能把它觀為假有,而能修厭、離欲、解脫——不應道理;與此相違,才是應理。由此行相,諸菩薩如實了知一切諸行皆是無常。
諸行是苦
又諸菩薩,觀無常諸行相續轉時,能為三種苦作所依止:一者行苦,二者壞苦,三者苦苦。如是菩薩如實了知一切諸行皆悉是苦。
諸法無我
又諸菩薩,如實了知有為、無為一切諸法的二種無我性:一者補特伽羅無我性,二者法無我性。於諸法中的補特伽羅無我性:謂並非「有法」即是真實的補特伽羅,也非離開「有法」另有真實的補特伽羅。於諸法中的法無我性:謂於一切言說事中,一切言說自性的諸法都無所有。如是菩薩如實了知一切諸法皆無有我。
涅槃寂靜
又諸菩薩,觀一切行先因永斷、後無餘滅、其餘畢竟不起不生,說名涅槃。當知涅槃其體寂靜——一切眾苦畢竟止息故,一切煩惱究竟寂滅故。
如是未得清淨增上意樂的菩薩、未見聖諦的諸聲聞乘人,雖於涅槃發起勝解,也這樣說「涅槃寂靜」,然而於涅槃尚未如實理解,尚未能以如實正智見而轉——但他們也有如理作意。
譬如王子或長者之子,生育以來未曾走出王宮、長者的內室;王及長者各為幼童假作種種遊戲之具——鹿車、牛車、馬車、象車——賜與他們。那時王子及長者子用來嬉戲,歡娛遊樂,就對這些假造的鹿、牛、馬、象,生起了真實的鹿想、牛想、馬想、象想。後來有一天,王及長者各知其子漸已長大、諸根成熟,向他們讚說真實的鹿、牛、馬、象。那時王子及長者子聽父親讚說,心想:「父王及父長者,莫不是在讚說我們所有的鹿、牛、馬、象四種車吧?」又到後來,王及長者知道兒子更大了,從內宮室引出外遊,指給他們看真實的鹿、牛、馬、象。他們見了,內心自然生起如實的慧解:「這才是實義的鹿車、牛車、馬車、象車!父親長久以來曾為我們讚說此事,只是我們無智,對那不如實的、只是相似、只是影像的東西,生起了真實鹿等的勝解。」由是因緣,對先前的勝解追起羞愧。
這裡:宮室,喻於生死;所生育的諸幼童子,喻未證得清淨增上意樂的菩薩及未見諦的諸聲聞乘人;父,喻諸佛及已證入大地的菩薩;先為他們假作鹿、牛等車,喻為宣說涅槃鹿相;後來讚說真實鹿等,喻佛菩薩自己現證親見真實涅槃,如其所見,於彼菩薩及聲聞之前讚說涅槃真實功德;其餘的部分,喻他們聽聞之後,只用隨順音聲的覺慧,於涅槃之德長夜勝解。若到那時資糧成熟、漸次增長,成為淨增上意樂的菩薩、見諦的聲聞,於真涅槃生起現證智;即於那時發生自內如實慧解:「這樣的涅槃,是一切聲聞獨覺所證、諸佛菩薩先前所讚說的;我們先前以愚夫的覺慧,對那不如實的、只是相似、只是影像的東西,生起了真實涅槃的勝解。」由是因緣,對先前的勝解追生羞愧,依止於後來的如實勝解。
又如病人前往大醫之所,為了除病,求隨順的藥,得到後常服。他對這藥深生勝解、深生愛樂、唯見為實。由此因緣,先前的病除愈了,又生起別的病,應服別的藥。那時大醫知道先病已愈、後病又生、更須別的藥,勸他捨棄前藥、令服餘藥。那時病人愚癡無識,對先前所服的藥深生勝解,起「這才適合我」之想,不肯棄捨。那時大良醫為他宣說前後藥性:對現在所患的病,前藥不宜,後藥為勝。那時病人雖聽到這話,不生勝解,還不深信良醫所言。
這裡:病者,喻諸凡夫、菩薩、聲聞,為煩惱病所執持;大良醫,喻諸如來;那些良藥,喻所宣說的或上、上勝、以至上極,或深、深勝、以至深極,或劣、或勝、以至勝極的法教、正教、教授教誡。他們雖然聽了,不能悟入、不生勝解,不能修行法隨法行。而諸有淨信的菩薩、聲聞,於佛所說不生疑惑,乘著佛所說的、猶如一切支具圓滿的妙莊嚴車的無上法乘,如善御者,隨所行之地、隨所應到之處,快快進趣,無所稽留。
Ten · Tranquillity and Insight
Herein, the bodhisattva, right within all phenomena, discerns nothing at all — this should be known as tranquillity. If, with respect to all phenomena, there is the true knowledge in accord with the real that ranges over the ultimate mode of principle, and the wondrous conventional knowledge that ranges over the immeasurable mode of principle established by convention — this should be known as insight.
Herein, the bodhisattva has, in brief, four practices that should be known as tranquillity: first, that which goes before the ultimate and conventional knowledge; second, the fruit of the ultimate and conventional knowledge; third, that which, throughout all conceptions of idle proliferation, turns without effort; fourth, that which, right within such an ineffable bare thing, by having no character and discerning nothing at all, is stilled in mind and tends toward the equal nature, the single-flavored real nature of all phenomena. By these four practices, the bodhisattvas' path of tranquillity turns onward, until, step by step, they are able to realize the fullness of the knowing and seeing of unsurpassed perfect awakening.
Herein, the bodhisattva has, in brief, four practices that should be known as insight: namely, that which goes before those four practices of the path of tranquillity, together with the wondrous insight that, with respect to all phenomena, keeps far from the wrong-grasping extreme of "over-affirmation" and keeps far from the wrong-grasping extreme of "under-denial," and that accords with the immeasurable mode of principle by which the distinctions among all phenomena are established. By these four practices, the bodhisattvas' path of insight turns onward, until, step by step, they are able to realize the fullness of the knowing and seeing of unsurpassed perfect awakening. This is called the brief account of the bodhisattva's tranquillity and insight.
Eleven · Skill in Means
What is the bodhisattva's skill in means (upāya-kauśalya)? It should be known that, stated in brief, there are twelve kinds: those directed inward, toward cultivating and realizing all the buddha-dharmas, are six in kind; those directed outward, toward ripening all sentient beings, are also six in kind.
The Six Directed Inward
What are the six kinds of skill in means directed inward, toward cultivating and realizing all the buddha-dharmas? First, the bodhisattva, toward all sentient beings, moves along in company with a heart of compassion, longing for them and not forsaking them. Second, the bodhisattva knows all conditioned activities thoroughly, in accord with the real. Third, the bodhisattva forever, toward all the wondrous knowledge of unsurpassed perfect awakening, with a deep heart takes delight. Fourth, the bodhisattva, because he takes as his ground his longing for sentient beings, does not forsake birth-and-death. Fifth, the bodhisattva, because he takes as his ground his knowing all conditioned activities thoroughly in accord with the real, revolves in birth-and-death yet his heart is undefiled. Sixth, the bodhisattva, because he takes as his ground his delight in the buddha-knowledge, is blazingly diligent. It should be known that these are called the bodhisattva's six kinds of skill in means directed inward, toward cultivating and realizing all the buddha-dharmas.
The Six Directed Outward · General Statement
What are the six kinds of skill in means directed outward, toward ripening all sentient beings? First, the bodhisattva's skill in means is able to make sentient beings, by a slight root of goodness, draw down an immeasurable fruit. Second, it is able to make sentient beings, by employing but slight effort, draw in vast and immeasurable roots of goodness. Third, toward sentient beings who spurn and turn their backs on the Buddha's holy teaching, it removes their anger and vexation. Fourth, toward sentient beings who stand midway before the Buddha's holy teaching, it makes them enter in. Fifth, toward those who have already entered into the Buddha's holy teaching, it makes them ripen. Sixth, toward those who have already ripened in the Buddha's holy teaching, it makes them attain liberation.
A Slight Root of Goodness Draws Down an Immeasurable Fruit
What is the bodhisattva's skill in means that makes sentient beings, by a slight root of goodness, draw down an immeasurable fruit? Namely, the bodhisattvas, by skill in means, exhort sentient beings to give away a poor and meager thing — down even to the very lowest, a single ball of roasted-grain meal — bestowing it upon a lowly and filthy field, down even to the class of squirming, creeping beasts; and, having made this gift, they turn it over toward the seeking of unsurpassed perfect awakening. Such a root of goodness, though the thing given and the field to which it is given are both lowly, by the force of the turning-over draws down an immeasurable fruit.
Slight Effort Draws In Vast Roots of Goodness
What is the bodhisattva's skill in means that makes sentient beings, by slight effort, draw in vast and immeasurable roots of goodness? Namely, the bodhisattvas' skill in means: if there are sentient beings who, out of resolute conviction, take up a wrong fasting-abstinence — down even to not taking food for a whole month, and the like — the bodhisattva proclaims for them the eightfold holy fasting-abstinence law, making them cast away the wrong fasting-abstinence that is utterly toilsome and draws down an unloved fruit, and exhorting them to train in the right fasting-abstinence that is not utterly toilsome and draws down a greatly loved fruit. If there are sentient beings who practice self-mortifying austerities, striving without slackening, who raise a wrong-means notion and seek liberation, he preaches for them the Middle Way, making them keep apart from the two extremes and causing them to enter in. If there are sentient beings who seek, in their notion, to be born in heaven, and who raise wrong means — hurling themselves off cliffs, rushing into fire, cutting off food and drink, and the like — he proclaims for them the meditative absorption free of error, making them win the abiding in ease within the present dharma, and reach the surpassing fruit of birth in heaven to come, which is without the several toils and hardships and arises together with joy and ease. If there are sentient beings who put faith in the brahmins' Vaidika spells, falsely reckoning that by diligently upholding, reciting, and reading them one attains ultimate purity, he by means exhorts them to uphold, recite, and reflect on the meaning within the Buddha's holy teaching.
Again, rightly for others, thus and thus proclaiming and disclosing the wondrous dharma, associated with the very deep emptiness that the Tathāgata has spoken, so as to make them give rise to a bold and decisive world-weariness and a fierce and keen pure faith — merely by such a single instant of a good mind moving along in company with world-weariness and pure faith, one can yet draw in vast roots of goodness beyond all reckoning, how much more when it is continuous and unbroken.
Again, the bodhisattvas, with all the sundry surpassing and wondrous rare treasures, fragrant garlands, and articles of offering that the world holds, raising a superior resolve that moves along with pure faith, make an offering of resolute conviction to the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Saṅgha, and also lead others to perform such an offering of resolute conviction. Again, at every place in all the worlds of the ten directions where offering is made to the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Saṅgha, they, with just such a superior resolve moving along with pure faith, take them all round about as their object, deeply giving rise to sympathetic rejoicing, and also lead others to make this sympathetic rejoicing. Again, the bodhisattvas forever cultivate the recollection of the Buddha, the recollection of the Dharma, and so on down to the recollection of the gods, and also lead others to cultivate the six recollections. Again, the bodhisattvas, by mind-and-word discernment, pay reverent homage to the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Saṅgha, down even to the end of their lives, letting no time pass in vain, and also lead others to perform this deed of homage. Again, the bodhisattvas, toward all the meritorious deeds of all sentient beings in the ten directions, rejoice sympathetically in every one, and also lead others to make this sympathetic rejoicing. Again, the bodhisattvas, toward all sentient beings in the ten directions, enter into the superior resolve of vast compassion, vowing with their own bodies to bear in every one's stead all their grief and suffering, and also lead others to raise up this vow of compassion. Again, the bodhisattvas, toward all lapses and all transgressions past and present, with a heart pure and pliant, loving and gladly following the precepts they have trained in, contemplate themselves as facing the place of the Buddhas, the World-Honored Ones of the ten directions, and with utmost sincerity lay them bare, repenting the past and cultivating the future, and also lead others to perform this deed — thus, again and again laying bare what has been transgressed, by employing slight effort, all the karmic obstacles attain release. Again, the bodhisattvas, having already possessed the supernormal powers and gained mastery of mind, everywhere in the ten directions, at the places of the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Saṅgha and in the midst of sentient beings, conjure up many and sundry conjured deeds, drawing in an immeasurable, great store of merit. Again, the bodhisattvas forever cultivate loving-kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity, and also lead others to make this cultivation. In such ways the bodhisattva, by slight effort, draws in the several surpassing and wondrous fruits of vast and immeasurable roots of goodness.
The Six Kinds of Skill in Means · General Statement
What is the bodhisattva's skill in means that, toward sentient beings who spurn and turn their backs on the Buddha's holy teaching, removes their anger and vexation; that, toward those who dwell midway, makes them enter in; that, toward those who have already entered in, makes them ripen; and that, toward those who have already ripened, makes them attain liberation? Namely, the bodhisattvas, in order to accomplish these four kinds of benefit-and-welfare for sentient beings, have — it should be known, stated in brief — a further six kinds of skill in means: first, the skill in means of according-and-reconciling; second, the skill in means of jointly setting up a covenant; third, the skill in means of a resolve of a differing part; fourth, the skill in means arising from pressure; fifth, the skill in means of bestowing kindness and requiting kindness; sixth, the skill in means of ultimate purity.
According-and-Reconciling
What is the bodhisattva's skill in means of according-and-reconciling? Namely, the bodhisattvas, before preaching the dharma for those sentient beings, should first, by means, accord with them: they display and set in motion a soft and lovely bearing of body and speech, and also display and set in motion a drawing-near, a giving, and a going-along, removing the anger and vexation that has arisen in the being toward himself; the anger and vexation removed, love and respect are born; love and respect born, delight arises in the dharma; and thereupon he proclaims for him the right dharma. The right dharma proclaimed, as befits him, is easy to enter and easy to understand, timely and step by step, without inversion, able to draw down benefit-and-welfare, and able to withstand challenge. In the matter of taming that being, [the bodhisattva] perfects the most surpassing heart that wishes to do him good and to be compassionate: he displays supernormal powers, mind-reading (knowing the being's mental intentions), and the disclosing preaching of the right dharma in accord with principle; or he requests others [to do so], or for his sake conjures up many and sundry extraordinary conjured deeds, so that that being is entirely tamed. If treatises that draw down benefit-and-welfare are exceedingly brief, he is able to elaborate them; if treatises that draw down benefit-and-welfare are exceedingly broad, he is able to state them briefly, causing him to take them up and hold them. He makes for him a bringing-to-mind, and grants him the raising of challenges. Once the being is able to receive and hold the dharma, [the bodhisattva] further, a step onward, opens the right meaning broadly for him. Again, in the matter of the samādhi-gateways of entering-in and of universally taking all as object, he is able to give a teaching and admonition that accords, benefiting sentient beings by making them cultivate the practice of benefit.
If there are sentient beings who, toward the scriptures associated with the very deep emptiness that the Buddha has spoken, do not understand the hidden intent and meaning of the Tathāgata — these scriptures saying that all phenomena are without intrinsic nature, are without any thing, are without arising and without ceasing, saying that all phenomena are all equal to open space, all like an illusion or a dream — they, having heard them, are unable to understand them according to their meaning, and their hearts give rise to fright and dread, and they defame all such scriptures, saying they are not what the Buddha spoke. The bodhisattva, for such sentient beings, by skill in means reconciles them in accord with principle, taking the very deep meaning of the Tathāgata's hidden intent within these scriptures and harmonizing it just as it is, and drawing in that being.
The bodhisattva, when he rightly reconciles in this way, says for them: this scripture does not say that all phenomena whatsoever are altogether nothing at all, but says that the "intrinsic nature as it is spoken" of phenomena is altogether nothing at all — and so it says "all phenomena are without intrinsic nature." Although there is all that is spoken of and expressed, and in dependence on it the expressings-in-speech come to turn, yet the "speakable intrinsic nature" that is expressed of it, in the sense of the highest meaning, is not its intrinsic nature — and so it says "all phenomena are without any thing." Since the reasoning of the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken of all phenomena is thus, and it has from the very origin been nothing at all, then what is there that could arise, what is there that could cease? — and so it says "all phenomena are without arising and without ceasing."
For example, in open space there are many forms and form-activities to be found, and open space contains and receives all the several forms and form-activities — within open space there presently appear the sundry deeds of going, or coming, or standing, of rising, falling, bending, and stretching; if at that time one removes and dispels all the forms and form-activities, then at that very time only the pure open space of the nature-without-form appears in its character. In just the same way, right upon this ineffable thing that resembles open space, there are the several wrong conceivings-and-discernments made by speech, and the graspings that follow along with idle proliferation, turning like form-activities; and all these wrong conceivings-and-discernments and graspings-following-idle-proliferation by speech, resembling the several form-activities, are contained and received by the ineffable thing that resembles open space. If at some time the bodhisattva, by wondrous holy knowledge, removes and dispels all the wrong conceivings-and-discernments and graspings-following-idle-proliferation that arise from speech, then at that time the bodhisattva, the most surpassing holy one, by wondrous holy knowledge realizes the ineffable thing of phenomena — shown forth as only "the intrinsic-nature of all speech is a non-nature" — for example, as the pure character of open space appears; and neither is there any further remaining intrinsic nature, beyond this, that ought to be sought out. And so it proclaims "all phenomena are all equal to open space."
Again, just as an illusion and a dream are not, as they appear, really existent in accord with the real, and yet the shape and stuff of all illusions and dreams are not altogether nothing at all — in just the same way, phenomena are not, as they appear by the force of the habituation of fools' speech, really existent in accord with the real, and yet the ineffable intrinsic nature, in the sense of the ultimate, of all phenomena is not altogether nothing at all. By the reasoning entered into through this means, all phenomena are neither existent nor non-existent, being like an illusion or a dream, their nature not-two — and so it proclaims "all phenomena are all like an illusion or a dream."
In this way the bodhisattva, everywhere throughout the dharma-realm of all phenomena, grasps no small part and forsakes no small part, makes no under-denial and makes no over-affirmation, and there is nothing he lets go to ruin: if a phenomenon is really existent, he knows it as really existent; if a phenomenon is really non-existent, he knows it as really non-existent; and as he knows it, thus does he disclose it. It should be known that this is called the bodhisattva's skill in means of according-and-reconciling.
Jointly Setting Up a Covenant
What is the bodhisattva's skill in means of jointly setting up a covenant? Namely, the bodhisattvas, if they see sentient beings who come seeking food and drink and the other ten kinds of things for sustaining the body, then set up a covenant (an agreement) jointly with them, saying: if you can know the kindness of father and mother and reverently make offering to them, and to the several śramaṇas and brahmins and the rest (as broadly stated before), down even to being able to uphold the pure precepts — then I, according to your wish, will give you food and drink and the several things for sustaining the body; but if you cannot, then I will not give them to you. In this way the bodhisattva, if he sees sentient beings who come seeking the several matters of fields, matters of dwellings, the several matters of markets, matters of the king, matters of walled cities, matters of wealth, matters of grain, or who come seeking the several crafts-industries and the several sciences, or who come seeking to be friends together, or who come seeking to make a marriage together, or who come seeking to hold a town-gathering together, or who come seeking help in managing an enterprise — the bodhisattva sets up a covenant with him, saying: if you can know the kindness of father and mother and reverently make offering to them (as broadly stated before) — then I will give you fields and dwellings, and, broadly stated, down to helping you manage your enterprise.
Again, the bodhisattvas, if they see sentient beings who have the several faults and transgressions, or who are accused and prosecuted, or who, for having done the several unbeneficial deeds, are seized by others and are about to be punished with bonds, severing, beating, humiliation, coercion, banishment, and exile; or who are seized by others and are about to be flogged, bound, and sold — the bodhisattva then, as far as he is able and with all his strength, sets up a covenant, saying: if you can know the kindness of father and mother and reverently make offering to them (as broadly stated before) — then I will by means rescue you, making you escape from this peril. Again, the bodhisattvas, if they see sentient beings who meet with the several dreads — of kings, robbers, water, fire, humans and non-humans, of not being able to live, of ill repute, and the like — the bodhisattva then sets up a covenant, saying: if you can know the kindness of father and mother and reverently make offering to them (as broadly stated before) — then I will by means rescue you, making you avoid this dread. Again, the bodhisattvas, if they see sentient beings who wish to meet with one they love, or seek to be parted from one they do not love, the bodhisattva then sets up a covenant, saying: if you can know the kindness of father and mother and reverently make offering to them (as broadly stated before) — then I will fulfill your wish, making the loved one meet and the unloved one part. Again, the bodhisattvas, if they see sentient beings afflicted by the suffering of illness, set up a covenant, saying: if you can know the kindness of father and mother and reverently make offering to them (as broadly stated before) — then I will save you from your illness-suffering, making you attain ease.
Those sentient beings, having thus had a covenant set up for them by the bodhisattva, swiftly receive-and-train in the several classes of the good, and swiftly remove-and-cut off the several classes of evil; and the bodhisattva is able in every case to fulfill their wish. It should be known that this is called the bodhisattva's skill in means of jointly setting up a covenant.
A Resolve of a Differing Part
What is the bodhisattva's skill in means of a resolve of a differing part? Namely, the bodhisattvas, having set up a covenant with sentient beings, if those sentient beings, in the several matters spoken of above, do not, according to their wish, swiftly practice — the bodhisattva then, toward the several matters spoken of above that he had sought, in no case gives them — solely for the sake of benefiting that being, and not out of some other resolve does he not give them to him. In just the same way, toward the several kinds of sentient beings who are amid the several places of peril, the several places of dread, who wish to meet with one they love, seek to part from one they do not love, or are troubled by illness-suffering, he provisionally, for the time, sets them aside — solely for the sake of benefiting that being, and not out of some differing mind does he set them aside, not out of some differing mind does he fail to rescue them. In this way the bodhisattva, when toward sentient beings he by means displays and sets in motion a deed that is hard and fierce, does so solely to benefit, not out of any remaining resolve; step by step making him, at another time, according to his wish, cut off the several evils and train in the several goods — and so by means he provisionally, for the time, sets him aside.
If there are sentient beings who, though they seek nothing of the bodhisattva, and have no manifold perils (broadly stated, down to having no illness-suffering), yet have with the bodhisattva a prior intimate and warm acquaintance, the bodhisattva, toward him, as is fitting, exhorts and guides him to cut off the several evil dharmas and cultivate the several good dharmas — namely, making him know the kindness of father and mother and reverently make offering to them, broadly stated down to receiving-and-training in accord with pure moral discipline. If that being, though favored with such exhortation and guidance from the bodhisattva, still deliberately, out of levity and license, does not carry it out, the bodhisattva then outwardly displays a bearing of wrath and reproach — solely wishing to benefit, not out of a resolve of wrath; in all that he does he displays perverseness and turning-away — solely to benefit, not out of a resolve of forsaking; or toward a certain class of person he displays and sets in motion the deed of an unbeneficial worldly one — solely to benefit, not out of a resolve of harm. In this way the bodhisattva, in the deeds he outwardly displays toward sentient beings, is of a "differing part" from the character of his inner resolve (the outer character and the inner mind not agreeing); by this cause-and-condition he by means settles that being in place, making him step by step cut off the several evils and step by step cultivate the several goods. And so this means of the bodhisattva's for taming sentient beings is called the bodhisattva's skill in means of a resolve of a differing part.
Arising from Pressure
What is the bodhisattva's skill in means arising from pressure? Namely, the bodhisattvas, whether being a householder-master or acting as a king, gain a dominant power, and toward their own kinsfolk and their own subjects are able rightly to instruct and admonish. As is fitting they say: "My several kinsfolk, my several subjects — if any of them, toward father and mother, does not know to requite kindness, broadly stated down to breaking the precepts, then I shall cut off the clothing and food and drink that I regularly grant him, or shall flog and punish him; or my kinsfolk shall become estranged from him, or my subjects shall be forever banished." And [the bodhisattva] moreover installs a man skillful, alert, and quick, ever making him observe and watch those matters. By this cause, those sentient beings, in dread of chastisement, diligently cut off the several evils and diligently cultivate the several goods. Though they have no wish or desire toward cultivating the good, by this means they are forcibly pressed to cultivate it. Therefore it is called the skill in means arising from pressure.
Bestowing Kindness and Requiting Kindness
What is the bodhisattva's skill in means of bestowing kindness and requiting kindness? Namely, the bodhisattvas first, toward sentient beings, according to their strength, in greater or lesser measure perform an act of kindness: either giving what they need, or relieving their peril, or removing their terror, or making them meet with the loved, or making them part from the unloved, or curing their illness-suffering, so that they attain ease. When those sentient beings, deeply aware of the kindness, wish to requite the virtue, the bodhisattva then exhorts them to cultivate the good, and by this receives the requital of kindness. He says: "You need not repay me with some other worldly wealth or goods to count as a great requital of kindness; if you can know the kindness of father and mother and reverently make offering to them, broadly stated down to upholding the pure precepts — this alone is called requiting kindness greatly, most greatly." The bodhisattva thus first, toward sentient beings, bestows kindness, and then exhorts and praises "cultivating the good is itself a great requital of kindness"; and by this means he makes them, toward the good, diligently train. Therefore it is called the skill in means of bestowing kindness and requiting kindness.
Ultimate Purity
What is the bodhisattva's skill in means of ultimate purity? Namely, the bodhisattvas, abiding at the ultimate ground of the bodhisattva, having well purified the bodhisattva-path, first display taking birth within the like-part [company] of the Tuṣita heaven. Immeasurable sentient beings think thus, saying: "That bodhisattva, so-and-so, has now been born within the like-part company of the Tuṣita heaven, and before long shall descend to be born in Jambudvīpa and shall realize unsurpassed perfect awakening. May we be able to meet with him and not miss him; and wherever this bodhisattva is born, may we too be able to be born there." Thus, in order to make immeasurable sentient beings raise up a right wish and delight, and in order to have them cultivate this wish and delight much.
Again, this bodhisattva, passing away from the company of the Tuṣita heaven, descends to the human realm, and is born into a house of high nobility or of eminent lineage — namely a royal house, or the house of a state-preceptor — and casts away the sundry surpassing and wondrous desirable pleasures of the world, with no longing left, and in purity leaves the household life: in order to make sentient beings give rise to reverence. Again, he displays vowing to undertake hard-to-practice austerities: in order to make sentient beings who are resolutely convinced of austerities cast away what they delight in. Again, he realizes unsurpassed perfect awakening: in order to make the remaining sentient beings, toward the awakening-and-liberation of the same course, give rise to a surpassing delight. Again, having realized unsurpassed perfect awakening, he does not at once preach the right dharma for sentient beings, but waits for the god-king Brahmā to come in person and request it: in order to make sentient beings give rise to reverence toward the right dharma — they will think thus: "The dharma about to be preached must be surpassing and wondrous, and that is why now Brahmā, longing for the World-Honored One to preach this dharma, has come in person to request it." Again, he contemplates the world with the buddha-eye — so as not to let sentient beings make such a defamation: "It was only because Brahmā came in person to request it, and out of respect for Brahmā, that he preached the right dharma; it was not out of his own compassion for sentient beings; he was spurred on by another, and was not himself able to know whether the occasion was suitable or not." In order to break through such a wrong grasping of that class of sentient beings, he first contemplates the world with the buddha-eye, and then turns the unsurpassed wheel of the dharma — such as no one in all the world had ever turned. In this way he again proclaims the right dharma and lays down the training-precepts. This is called the bodhisattva's skill in means of ultimate purity. By the skill in means spoken of here, there is no further skill in means that yet surpasses or is more wondrous than this — and so it is called ultimate purity.
In this way the six kinds — whether brief or broad — of skill in means that the bodhisattva has spoken of are able to remove all the anger and vexation of sentient beings who spurn and turn their backs on the holy teaching; those who dwell midway, they make enter in; those who have already entered in, they make ripen; those who have already ripened, they make attain liberation. Beyond this there is nothing further or fuller. This is called the bodhisattva's skill in means.
Twelve · The Wondrous Dhāraṇīs
What are the bodhisattva's wondrous dhāraṇīs? It should be known that such wondrous dhāraṇīs are, in brief, of four kinds: first, the dharma-dhāraṇī; second, the meaning-dhāraṇī; third, the spell-dhāraṇī; fourth, the dhāraṇī for attaining the bodhisattva's acceptance.
What is the bodhisattva's dharma-dhāraṇī? Namely, the bodhisattvas gain such a sustaining force of mindfulness and wisdom, and by this sustaining force, toward the immeasurable scriptures that they have heard but never before heard, whose wording they have not rehearsed, that they have not thoroughly mastered, that are gathered up under name-body, phrase-body, and syllable-body, whose sequence is intricately interwoven, whose sequence is compiled — across immeasurable time they are able to hold them without forgetting. This is called the bodhisattva's dharma-dhāraṇī.
What is the bodhisattva's meaning-dhāraṇī? Namely, as said before; the difference being: right upon the immeasurable meaning of that dharma, which their mind has not rehearsed and has not thoroughly mastered, across immeasurable time they are able to hold it without forgetting. This is called the bodhisattva's meaning-dhāraṇī.
What is the bodhisattva's spell-dhāraṇī? Namely, the bodhisattvas gain such mastery in meditative equipoise, and by this mastery empower those spell-phrases that are able to remove sentient beings' calamities and afflictions, making those phrases all become potent, potent in the highest degree, nothing wasted, able to remove not one kind only but the several kinds of calamities and afflictions. This is called the bodhisattva's spell-dhāraṇī.
What is the bodhisattva's dhāraṇī for attaining the bodhisattva's acceptance? Namely, the bodhisattvas accomplish the naturally-firm cause-conduct and are fully furnished with wondrous wisdom; dwelling alone in an empty and idle place, stilled and without speech, never with a single thing, they walk seeing the path; they eat knowing the measure, do not eat mixed with filth, and eat one class only; ever in deepest meditative absorption, in the night-watch they sleep little and are awake much; and toward the spell-phrases that the Buddha has spoken for attaining the bodhisattva's acceptance, they are able to reflect on them in truth and reality. Their spell-words say: iṭṭhi miṭṭhi kiṭṭhi bhikṣānti padāni svāhā. Right upon the meaning of such spell-phrases they examine, reflect, weigh, and contemplate. When he thus rightly practices toward the meaning of such spell-phrases, not hearing it from another, he naturally penetrates through: he knows that such spell-phrases are altogether without meaning, are the perfectly-accomplished real, and are only meaning-less; he knows in accord with the real that the meaning of these phrases is just "meaning-less." Therefore, beyond this, he seeks no further meaning — reaching this, it is called the wondrous-and-good penetration of the meaning of the spell-phrases.
After he has rightly penetrated the meaning of such spell-phrases, then following this meaning, not hearing it from another, he himself rightly penetrates the meaning of all phenomena. Namely, toward this meaning he penetrates in this way: the meaning of the intrinsic nature of all phenomena that is spoken and expressed in all speech is one and all not accomplished as real; there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, and this is the meaning of intrinsic nature. After he has rightly penetrated this meaning of the intrinsic nature of phenomena, beyond this there is no further meaning to be sought. Because of well penetrating this meaning, he gains the most surpassing, vast gladness. Thereby the bodhisattva attains dhāraṇī, and it should be said that he has attained the bodhisattva's surpassing acceptance established by these dhāraṇī-phrases. Because he attains this acceptance, these bodhisattvas shall before long attain the pure surpassing resolve, having turned by the surpassing acceptance of the higher-grade Ground of Practice-through-Resolute-Conviction. It should be known that this is called the bodhisattva's dhāraṇī for attaining the bodhisattva's acceptance.
Herein, the bodhisattva's dharma-dhāraṇī and meaning-dhāraṇī, if [attained] after passing the first incalculable great eon, after already entering the Ground of Pure Surpassing Resolve, are then settled, firmly established, and vast; below this, whether by the force of a vow or in dependence on meditative absorption, though there is some attaining, it is not settled, not firmly established, not vast. As said for the two dhāraṇīs of dharma and meaning, so should the spell-dhāraṇī be known to be. The dhāraṇī for attaining the bodhisattva's acceptance is, as explained above, attained just so.
If the bodhisattvas are furnished with four kinds of quality, they then gain such dhāraṇīs, and lacking any one it cannot be. Which four kinds of quality? First, toward the several desires they have no craving-attachment; second, toward another's surpassing affairs they raise no jealous grudge, and are not envious of another's glory; third, toward all that is sought they give equally, without regret; fourth, toward the right dharma they deeply give rise to gladness — one who gladdens in the dharma, toward the bodhisattva-canon and the mātṛkā (the matrix) of the bodhisattva-canon deeply and heartily loves and delights.
Thirteen · The Right Vow
What is the right vow that the bodhisattva cultivates? It should be known that this vow is, in brief, of five kinds: first, the vow of arousing the mind; second, the vow of taking birth; third, the vow of what is to be practiced; fourth, the right vow; fifth, the great vow.
If the bodhisattvas, toward unsurpassed perfect awakening, arouse the mind for the very first time, this is called the vow of arousing the mind. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, to take birth among the several good destinies that are able to accord with and benefit sentient beings, this is called the vow of taking birth. If the bodhisattvas vow to be able, without inversion, to consider-and-discern all phenomena, and to vow, with respect to the [meditative] object, to cultivate the immeasurable and equal surpassing good dharmas, this is called the vow of what is to be practiced. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, to draw in all the bodhisattva good dharmas, and to draw in all merits there are — all the right vows, whether general or particular — this is called the right vow. The bodhisattva's great vow, it should be known, issues from the right vow, and this again is of ten kinds:
If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, with every kind of surpassing and wondrous article of offering to make offering to the immeasurable and boundless Tathāgatas, it should be known that this is called the first great vow. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, to draw in and guard the right dharma that all the Buddhas, the World-Honored Ones, have, transmitting and upholding the dharma-eye so that it is not cut off and ruined, it should be known that this is called the second right vow. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, to descend from the palace of the Tuṣita heaven, as spoken of before, down even to entering great parinirvāṇa, it should be known that this is called the third great vow. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, to practice every kind of the bodhisattva's right practice, it should be known that this is called the fourth great vow. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, to be able everywhere to ripen all sentient beings, it should be known that this is called the fifth great vow. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, to be able to display themselves in all the worlds, it should be known that this is called the sixth great vow. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, to be able everywhere to purify-and-cultivate all buddha-lands, it should be known that this is called the seventh great vow. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, that all bodhisattvas may, of one and the same kind of resolve and applied practice, enter into the Great Vehicle, it should be known that this is called the eighth great vow. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, that all their uninverted applied practices there are may none of them be in vain, it should be known that this is called the ninth great vow. If the bodhisattvas vow, in the time to come, swiftly to realize unsurpassed perfect awakening, it should be known that this is called the tenth great vow.
Fourteen · The Three Samādhis
What is the bodhisattva's samādhi of emptiness? Namely, the bodhisattvas contemplate all things, keeping far from all intrinsic nature as spoken, [seeing] that there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, and their mind is rightly settled. This is called the bodhisattva's samādhi of emptiness.
What is the bodhisattva's samādhi of wishlessness? Namely, the bodhisattvas, right upon all the things of the ineffable intrinsic nature that they contemplate with even regard, [seeing] that, being drawn in by the afflictions raised through wrong discernment and by the several sufferings, they are all defiled by immeasurable faults; toward the world to come, with non-wishing going before, their mind is rightly settled. This is called the bodhisattva's samādhi of wishlessness.
What is the bodhisattva's samādhi of no-character? Namely, the bodhisattvas, right upon all the things of the ineffable intrinsic nature that they rightly reflect on, [seeing] that all the characters of discernment and idle proliferation are forever extinguished and stilled, know this in accord with the real, and their mind is rightly settled. This is called the bodhisattva's samādhi of no-character.
Question: Why are only three samādhis set up, with none too few and none too many? Answer: Phenomena are of two kinds, namely the existent and the non-existent. The conditioned and the unconditioned are named "the existent"; self and what belongs to self are named "the non-existent." Within the conditioned, because there is nothing to wish for and because it is to be found loathsome, it should be known that on this basis the samādhi of wishlessness is established. Within the unconditioned, because one wishes for nirvāṇa and because it is drawn in by right delight, it should be known that on this basis the samādhi of no-character is established. Toward the thing that is non-existent, the bodhisattva neither wishes nor even not-wishes; yet toward the non-existent, the bodhisattva sees it in accord with the real as non-existent — on the basis of this seeing, it should be known, the samādhi of emptiness is established.
In this way the bodhisattva, within these three kinds of samādhi, diligently trains, and upon this basis knows [them] in accord with the real; toward the three samādhis of the remaining modes-of-apprehension he penetrates in accord with the real, toward the mode of principle established by convention he penetrates in accord with the real, and toward the mode of principle of cultivation he knows in accord with the real — namely, [that mode] in which the several śrāvakas diligently train and fully realize.
Fifteen · The Four Dharma-Uddānas
(The root text here crosses a fascicle boundary: the Bodhisattva Stage, the fifteenth, of the Basic Section · the Preliminary Yoga-Station · the Chapter on the Factors of Awakening, the seventeenth, third part.)
There are, further, four dharma-uddānas, which the buddhas and bodhisattvas speak in order to make sentient beings pure. Which four? All conditioned activities are impermanent — this is called the first dharma-uddāna; all conditioned activities are, one and all, suffering — this is called the second dharma-uddāna; all phenomena are without a self — this is called the third dharma-uddāna; nirvāṇa is quiescent — this is called the fourth dharma-uddāna.
The buddhas and bodhisattvas, mostly for sentient beings, proclaim such meaning that is associated with the dharma, and therefore it is called a dharma-uddāna. Again, from of old, the several honored sages of silence, whose minds are stilled, at all times pass it on and proclaim it in turn, and therefore this is called an uddāna. Again, this track of conduct is able to lead onward to the great birth, and is also able to lead onward out of the summit of existence, and therefore this is called an uddāna.
All Conditioned Activities Are Impermanent
What is it for the bodhisattva to contemplate with even regard that all conditioned activities are impermanent? Namely, the bodhisattvas contemplate that the intrinsic nature as spoken of all conditioned activities is at all times ever nothing at all — such conditioned activities being ever unattainable, they are therefore named impermanent. Again, they contemplate that in that ineffable thing, because it is not thoroughly known in its true reality, with not-knowing (ajñāna) as the cause, arising and ceasing are to be found — such conditioned activities' ineffable intrinsic nature having arising and having ceasing, they are therefore named impermanent.
Again, the bodhisattvas contemplate past activities as already arisen and already ceased: because for those activities no cause is to be found, and there is no intrinsic nature either, they therefore contemplate that both their causal nature and their intrinsic nature are nothing at all. They contemplate present activities as already arisen but not yet ceased: because for those activities the cause is not to be found (having already given the fruit) and the intrinsic nature is to be found (not yet having ceased), they therefore contemplate that their intrinsic nature is present but there is no cause. They contemplate future activities as not yet arisen and not yet ceased: because for those activities a cause is to be found (not yet having given the fruit) and there is no intrinsic nature (not yet having arisen), they therefore contemplate that there is only causal nature and no intrinsic nature.
The bodhisattva, having thus seen the segmented conditioned activities of the three times turning on in continuity, contemplates with even regard that the conditioned activities of each single instant all have the three characters of the conditioned, and after the instant there is further a fourth character of the conditioned. Right herein: the intrinsic nature of the prior-instant activity perishing, and without interval, the instant-intrinsic-nature of activities not prior arising — this is rightly contemplated as "arising"; the activities having arisen, being for the moment not yet perished — this is rightly contemplated as "abiding"; this already-arisen activity, being somewhat different from the instant-intrinsic-nature of the prior already-ceased activities — this is rightly contemplated as "aging"; from the instant after these activities arise, this same already-arisen activities' instant-intrinsic-nature perishing — this is rightly contemplated as "ceasing."
The bodhisattva contemplates that this already-arisen instant activities' intrinsic nature is just the intrinsic nature of arising, abiding, and aging, and does not see that arising and the rest have any separate intrinsic nature; he contemplates in accord with the real that, in the instant after arising, this same arising-and-the-rest activities' instant-intrinsic-nature perishes, and has no separate nature. In this way the four characters of the conditioned gather up all activities, and, to state it essentially, are shown forth by two divisions: first, that shown by the "existent" division; second, that shown by the "non-existent" division. Herein the World-Honored One, in dependence on the "existent" division, establishes one character of the conditioned, and in dependence on the "non-existent" division establishes the second character of the conditioned; abiding and altering, the two kinds, being both shown by the "existent" division of activities, establish the third character of the conditioned.
Herein the bodhisattva contemplates that at all times there is only activities, and beyond this there is no "arising, abiding, aging, ceasing" ever really a thing, accomplished as an intrinsic nature. Why? When activities arise, there is only such activities to be found, and there is no other separate arising, abiding, aging, ceasing; when such activities abide, age, and cease, there is only such activities to be found, and there is no other separate arising, abiding, aging, ceasing.
Again, the bodhisattvas, seeking by reasoning, [find that] arising and the rest as real things are also not to be found. This seeking-and-not-finding means: if apart from those forms and the other activities there were a separate "arising" dharma, then, just as forms and the other activities have arising in their own substance, so this "arising" too ought to have arising; and thus there ought to be two kinds of arising — first, the arising of activity; second, the arising of arising. Then, are the arising of activity and that arising of arising one, or different? If they are said to be one, then to reckon "arising" as really existent becomes empty talk; and to say that there is a separate "arising" that is really a thing existent does not fit the reasoning. If they are said to be different, then it ought to become "the arising of arising that is not [the arising] of activity"; whereas "it is the arising of arising that is [the arising] of activity" does not fit the reasoning. As is said of the character of arising, so, broadly stated, of the characters of abiding, aging, and ceasing, it should be known to be likewise — if the "ceasing" dharma had a separate intrinsic nature and were accomplished as a real thing, then this ceasing ought to have arising and have ceasing; if at the time ceasing arises, all activities ought to cease together, and thus, by employing slight effort, as though entering the attainment of cessation, the several minds and mental factors would one and all cease; if at the time "ceasing" ceases, all activities, though already one and all ceased, ought again to arise — because "ceasing" is already gone. Therefore to say that "ceasing" has arising and has ceasing does not fit the reasoning.
Again, if for a good man or a good woman there were at all times something ever really a thing, accomplished as an intrinsic nature, and yet they could contemplate it as provisionally existent, and could thereby cultivate world-weariness, dispassion, and liberation — this does not fit the reasoning; the reverse of this is what fits the reasoning. By this mode-of-apprehension, the bodhisattvas know in accord with the real that all conditioned activities are impermanent.
All Conditioned Activities Are Suffering
Again, the bodhisattvas, contemplating impermanent activities as they turn on in continuity, [find that] they are able to serve as the ground for the three kinds of suffering: first, the suffering of conditionedness; second, the suffering of change; third, the suffering of suffering. In this way the bodhisattva knows in accord with the real that all conditioned activities are, one and all, suffering.
All Phenomena Are Without a Self
Again, the bodhisattvas know in accord with the real the two kinds of no-self-nature of all phenomena, conditioned and unconditioned: first, the no-self-nature of the person; second, the no-self-nature of phenomena. The no-self-nature of the person within phenomena: namely, it is not that "the dharmas-that-are" are the real person, nor is it that apart from "the dharmas-that-are" there is a separate real person. The no-self-nature of phenomena within phenomena: namely, that within all that is spoken and expressed, the phenomena that are the intrinsic nature of all speech are altogether nothing at all. In this way the bodhisattva knows in accord with the real that all phenomena are without a self.
Nirvāṇa Is Quiescent
Again, the bodhisattvas contemplate that all activities, their prior cause forever cut off, thereafter ceasing without remainder, and the rest utterly not rising and not arising, is named nirvāṇa. It should be known that nirvāṇa is in its substance quiescent — because all the several sufferings are utterly stilled, and because all the afflictions are ultimately quenched.
Thus the bodhisattvas who have not attained the pure surpassing resolve, and the several śrāvaka-vehicle persons who have not seen the holy truths, though toward nirvāṇa they raise a resolute conviction and likewise say "nirvāṇa is quiescent," yet toward nirvāṇa they do not yet understand in accord with the real, and are not yet able to turn by the true knowing-and-seeing in accord with the real — but they too have attention in accord with principle.
For example, a prince or the son of an elder, from his birth and rearing has never yet walked out of the palace of the king or the inner chambers of the elder; the king and the elder each, for the young child, make up the several playthings — a deer-cart, an ox-cart, a horse-cart, an elephant-cart — and bestow them on them. At that time the prince and the son of the elder use them to play, delighting and disporting themselves, and thereupon, toward these made-up deer, oxen, horses, and elephants, give rise to a real deer-notion, ox-notion, horse-notion, elephant-notion. Later, one day, the king and the elder each know that their son has gradually grown up and his faculties have ripened, and praise for them the real deer, oxen, horses, and elephants. At that time the prince and the son of the elder, hearing the father's praise, think: "Could it be that our royal father and our elder father are praising the four kinds of cart — the deer, oxen, horses, and elephants — that we have?" Again, later on, the king and the elder, knowing that the son has grown larger, lead him out from the inner chambers to roam abroad, and point out to them the real deer, oxen, horses, and elephants. They, having seen them, naturally give rise within to an understanding-of-wisdom in accord with the real: "These are the deer-cart, ox-cart, horse-cart, and elephant-cart of real meaning! Father has, over a long time, praised this matter for us; it is only that we, without wisdom, toward those things that were not in accord with the real, that were merely resemblances, merely images, gave rise to a resolute conviction of real deer and the rest." By this cause-and-condition, toward their former resolute conviction they follow up with shame.
Herein: the palace-chamber figures birth-and-death; the several young children born and reared figure the bodhisattvas who have not realized the pure surpassing resolve and the several śrāvaka-vehicle persons who have not seen the truths; the father figures the buddhas and the bodhisattvas who have already realized-and-entered the great grounds; the making-up for them, at first, of the deer, oxen, and the other carts figures the proclaiming for them of the deer-character of nirvāṇa; the later praising of the real deer and the rest figures the buddhas and bodhisattvas themselves presently realizing and personally seeing the real nirvāṇa, and, as they have seen it, praising before those bodhisattvas and śrāvakas the real qualities of nirvāṇa; the remaining part figures their, after hearing, using only an understanding-of-wisdom that goes along with the sound, and, toward the virtue of nirvāṇa, holding a resolute conviction through the long night. If at that time the store of provisions ripens and step by step increases, and they become bodhisattvas of the pure surpassing resolve and śrāvakas who have seen the truths, giving rise, toward the true nirvāṇa, to the knowledge of present realization; then at that time there arises within them an understanding-of-wisdom in accord with the real: "Such a nirvāṇa is what all śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas realize, and what the buddhas and bodhisattvas praised before; we formerly, with the understanding-of-wisdom of fools, toward those things that were not in accord with the real, that were merely resemblances, merely images, gave rise to a resolute conviction of a real nirvāṇa." By this cause-and-condition, toward their former resolute conviction they follow up with shame, and take as their ground the later resolute conviction in accord with the real.
Again, it is like a sick person who goes to a great physician, and in order to remove his illness seeks the medicine that accords, and, having got it, regularly takes it. Toward this medicine he deeply gives rise to resolute conviction, deeply gives rise to fond delight, and sees it as real alone. By this cause-and-condition, the former illness is cured, and again a different illness arises, and he ought to take a different medicine. At that time the great physician knows that the former illness is already cured, that a later illness has arisen again, and that a different medicine is further needed, and exhorts him to cast away the former medicine and have him take the other medicine. At that time the sick person, foolish and without discernment, toward the medicine he formerly took deeply gives rise to resolute conviction, raises the notion "this alone suits me," and is unwilling to cast it away. At that time the great good physician proclaims for him the nature of the former and later medicines: for the illness he now suffers, the former medicine is unsuitable, the later medicine is superior. At that time the sick person, though he hears this word, gives rise to no resolute conviction, and still does not deeply trust what the good physician says.
Herein: the sick one figures the several ordinary beings, bodhisattvas, and śrāvakas, held fast by the illness of the afflictions; the great good physician figures the several Tathāgatas; those good medicines figure the dharma-teachings, right teachings, and teachings-and-admonitions that are proclaimed — whether high, higher-and-surpassing, on up to the utmost; or deep, deeper-and-surpassing, on up to the deepest; or inferior, or surpassing, on up to the utmost-surpassing. They, though they have heard them, are unable to enter in and give rise to no resolute conviction, and are unable to practice the practice-in-accord-with-the-dharma. But the several bodhisattvas and śrāvakas who have pure faith, toward what the Buddha has spoken give rise to no doubt, and mounting the unsurpassed dharma-vehicle — spoken by the Buddha, like a wondrously adorned cart complete in all its parts and fittings — like a good driver, according to the ground they travel and according to the place they should reach, swiftly and swiftly press onward, with nothing detaining them.
止觀:八個字的止,兩種智的觀
子一末尾,菩薩的四念住觀到「遠離言說自性」;本子開頭,論本緊接著問:那能觀的心,如何安立?答案極簡:「此中菩薩即於諸法無所分別,當知名止。若於諸法勝義理趣如實真智,及於無量安立理趣世俗妙智,當知名觀」——止是無所分別,觀是真俗二智。遁倫總括:「靜慮一緣離諸分別當知名止,次明真俗二智名觀」。
止有四行:勝義世俗智前行、勝義世俗智果、普於一切戲論想中無功用轉、「即於如是離言唯事,由無有相無所分別,其心寂靜,趣向一切法平等性、一味實性」。古德逐行拆解(景泰基三師,遁倫並錄):第一行是二智之前的方便定(基云「與加行智同時定」);第四行,泰云「於離言唯事依他性其心寂靜是真智也」,基云「說正智觀依他,不分別有性,故入一味真如義」。窺基還給四行配了位次:「第一、在地前加行道中;第二、入地已去乃至七地以前;第三、在八地以上乃至九地;第四、十地為之,入於佛地」——四行止就是一條從地前直到佛地的定學階梯。
觀四行以止道為前行,「於一切法遠離增益不正執邊,遠離損減不正執邊」,及隨順安立理趣妙觀——又是真實義品的無二中道,在觀門上重現。
方便善巧:內外各六
方便善巧十二種:依內修證佛法六(悲心顧戀、如實遍知、欣樂佛智,及依此三而不捨生死、輪轉不染、熾然精進),依外成熟有情六(少善根感無量果、少功力引廣大善根,及對憎背、處中、已趣入、已成熟四類有情的四種成辦)。
「少善根感無量果」的教法極平實:勸人捨「乃至最下唯一麨團」施與傍生,迴向無上菩提——「物田雖下,由迴向力,感無量果」。「少功力引廣大善根」則是一整串轉邪為正的路數:以八支聖齋替換自餓邪齋、以中道替換苦行、以靜慮替換投巖赴火、以佛聖教替換吠地迦呪(窺基:「此云明呪也」);乃至勝解供養、隨喜、六念、意言禮敬、代苦悲願、發露悔往——「數數發露所犯,少用功力,一切業障皆得解脫」。
隨順會通:替驚怖空經的人解開死結
依外六種方便中的第一種,藏著本子最重的一段義理。有情聞佛所說甚深空性相應經典——「說一切法皆無自性、皆無有事、無生無滅,說一切法皆等虛空、皆如幻夢」——「如其義趣不能解了,心生驚怖,誹謗如是一切經典,言非佛說」。菩薩怎麼辦?不迴避,不改口,而是「如理會通」如來密意:
「此經不說一切諸法都無所有,但說諸法所言自性都無所有」——經說「無自性」,無的是言說安立的自性,不是把一切法說成空無。窺基以三性讀之:「不說依他等二性都無性,說遍計所言自性是無也」;所言自性之無,「如兔角」。「無有事」是無遍計之事,非無依他;「無生無滅」是所言自性從本無故無可生滅。
「皆等虛空」,論本自設一喻:虛空中色來色往,若把色與色業盡皆除遣,「唯無色性清淨虛空其相顯現」——以妙聖智遣除言說戲論之後,「唯有一切言說自性非性所顯」,如虛空清淨相現。窺基:「此喻真如如空,遍計如色等」。「皆如幻夢」:幻夢「非如顯現如實是有,亦非一切幻夢形質都無所有」——諸法「非有非無,其性無二」。窺基:「喻依他如幻等」;三性各自非有非無,圓成「非無,勝義有也」。
收束八個字,正是善取空的行門版:「不取少分、不捨少分,不作損減、不作增益」——「若法實有,知為實有;若法實無,知為實無;如其所知,如是開示」。窺基:「不取遍計,不捨二性……名無失壞」。
其後四種方便(共立要契——「汝等若能知父母恩,恭敬供養……如是我當施汝」;異分意樂——外現剛捍「唯為利益,非餘意樂」;逼迫所生——家主國王以賞罰「強逼令修」;施恩報恩——「汝等若能……受持淨戒,如是乃名大報恩德」),是把善巧用到人情世故的粗糲處。第六究竟清淨方便善巧則是佛自身的示現:生兜率、下人間、出家、苦行、證覺、待梵王請、佛眼觀世、轉法輪——遁倫記其開合「闕少四事,加一苦行」;泰云補「梵王初請不則為說……後至鹿園方說法也」。
妙陀羅尼:一句無義的呪,如何開出離言的忍
四陀羅尼:法(聞持不忘)、義(義趣不忘)、呪(等持自在加被呪句「悉皆神驗」)、能得菩薩忍。前三是總持力,第四是一樁奇特的修法:具足妙慧的菩薩,獨處空閑、節食少眠,對佛所說的忍呪章句「審諦思惟」——呪詞曰:壹胝蜜胝吉胝毘羼底鉢陀膩莎訶。
想破頭去求這句呪的意思嗎?論本的答案翻轉一切:他「不從他聞,自然通達;了知如是諸呪章句都無有義,是圓成實,但唯無義;如實了知此章句義,所謂無義」——呪的意義,就是「無義」本身。由此翻上一層:「一切言說所說諸法自性之義皆不成實,唯有諸法離言自性是自性義」——從一句無所詮的呪,通達一切法的離言自性,得陀羅尼所立的菩薩勝忍,不久當得淨勝意樂。
古德於此各下一手:三藏(玄奘)云「此以無分別智為體。若爾,何故言能得忍?此於加行道中,持思此呪故速得真智證於真如,故下文在勝解行地」;基云「地前菩薩誦此無義之呪,欲除計執……由此思惟故,便能入真觀,證菩薩忍」;備師云「呪句正詮依他圓成離言無生故,菩薩諦思自然得解無生法忍。論云:無義意在於此」。呪不靈在音聲,靈在把『求義的心』逼到言語道斷之處。
得此陀羅尼有四功德為門檻:於欲無貪、不嫉他榮、等施無悔、深樂菩薩藏——缺一不可。
正願:從一念發心到十大願
五願:發心願(最初發心)、受生願(願生饒益有情善趣)、所行願、正願、大願;大願從正願開出十種——供養無量諸佛、攝受防護正法「傳持法眼令無斷壞」、從兜率下生乃至涅槃、行一切菩薩正行、成熟一切有情、一切世界示現、淨修一切佛土、一切菩薩同一意樂趣入大乘、無倒加行皆不唐捐、速證無上正等菩提。願體是什麼?古德四說並陳(遁倫錄):古師依成實以忍為體、備師以智為性、三藏云「思欲信上假立願也」、景師用勝解欲思信為體——玄奘之說亦在列,唯錄不判。
三三摩地:空,安住在離言自性上
菩薩的空三摩地,定義只有一句:「觀一切事,遠離一切言說自性,唯有諸法離言自性,心正安住」——空不是觀『什麼都沒有』,是心安住在離言自性上。無願三摩地:於離言自性的諸事,見其為煩惱眾苦所污,「於當來世不願為先,心正安住」。無相三摩地:於離言自性的諸事,「一切分別戲論眾相永滅寂靜,如實了知,心正安住」。
為什麼恰好三個?論本自答:法有二種——有(有為、無為)與非有(我、我所)。於有為,可厭故立無願;於無為,願涅槃故立無相;於非有,「菩薩不願,亦無無願。然於非有,菩薩如實見為非有。依此見故,當知建立空三摩地」——空三摩地的本質是一個「如實見非有」的見。
景師給本段下了定位:「此明大乘不共三三摩地,以無分別智相應定數一體義說。下約十六行辨三三摩地與二乘共」——依離言自性立的三三摩地是大乘不共門;依四諦十六行立的,才與二乘共。基師則作行相攝配(空唯苦下二行等,引《顯揚》第二卷),自判「此論文意,在真觀中義用分立此三解脫門」。
四種法嗢拕南:四句老話,講出三性的深度
「復有四種法嗢拕南,諸佛菩薩欲令有情清淨故說」:諸行無常、諸行皆苦、諸法無我、涅槃寂靜。遁倫在譯名上留下正名一條:「若作嗢字皆須改正,舊語不正,名四優陀那,翻名為印……如說無常是有為標相,苦是有漏法標相,無我是一切法標相,涅槃寂靜是無為法標相」;窺基「此云說也,即世尊常誦說」——「翻名為印」,古德此條明文。
無常,論本給出兩層:言說自性於一切時常無所有,「諸行常不可得,故名無常」——遍計層的無常,是根本沒有那個東西;離言事以無知為因而生滅可得——依他層的無常,才是有生有滅。景云把兩層串成一氣:「隨其言說執有定性遍計所執,如此執時熏種成因,生彼依他色心等法有生即滅,故名無常」——執言說為實的那一念,熏成種子,生出會生滅的依他諸行。三世觀(過去無因無自性、現在有自性無因、未來有因無自性)之下,測師錄西方兩釋:「一云,法相道理於一現在法建立三世……二云:唯識道理建立三世,謂於現在見分體上有三世相而得顯現,故說三世,據實是現在攝」;三藏於「過未等無云何無常」亦有兩解——並錄。
剎那四相一段是精微的法相功夫:前剎那滅、新剎那生,生(正生)、住(生已未壞)、老(望前別異)、滅(生後自性滅壞),而「不見生等別有自性」——生住老滅只是諸行自身的分位,不是行外另有四個實物。窺基判宗:「若依小乘,生在未來,三相在現在;今依大乘,生等三相在現在,滅在過去」,並以秤喻答生滅同時之疑:「如秤兩頭,平等平等,故一剎那有生有滅」。論本更以理破「生」實有:若生外有生,應有「生生」,行生與生生一則計生唐捐、異則非行生生;破「滅」實有:若滅有生滅,「若滅生時,一切諸行皆應同滅,這樣就應該少用功力、如入滅定般,諸心心所一切皆滅;若滅滅時,一切諸行雖皆已滅,復應還生」——把「無常」從常識推到勝義。
苦:無常行為行苦、壞苦、苦苦三苦所依。無我:二無我——補特伽羅無我(非即諸法有實我、非離諸法有實我;窺基「謂破即蘊、異蘊計我也」)、法無我(「於一切言說事中,一切言說自性諸法都無所有」)——法無我的定義,仍是那一句離言。
涅槃寂靜:先因永斷、後無餘滅、畢竟不起。窺基三重配:「即有餘、無餘涅槃也。又先因永斷,在無間道;後無餘斷,在解脫道。又先因永斷,在加行伏上心;後無餘斷,斷種子」。
而後論本說了兩個長喻。王子四車喻:王子生於深宮,只玩過父親假作的鹿車牛車馬車象車,便於假車起真實鹿馬之想;長大出宮,見了真鹿真馬,才「於先勝解追起羞愧」——宮室喻生死,幼童喻未得淨勝意樂的菩薩與未見諦的聲聞,父喻諸佛與大地菩薩,假車喻宣說中的涅槃之相,出宮親見喻現證。未見諦的人說「涅槃寂靜」,說的其實是影像;見諦之後回頭看,自愧先前把影像當了真——但論本並不因此叫人閉口,因為「彼亦有如理作意」:影像的勝解,是走向現證的必經之路。基師更把四車配四涅槃:「象喻無住涅槃……鹿始終常居山靜,喻本來淨。牛有角故,喻有餘依。馬無角故,喻無餘依」(另有三乘配,並錄)。
病者良藥喻:前藥治好了前病,後病生了該換藥,病人卻對前藥「深生勝解……不肯棄捨」——佛說法教前後淺深,執著前藥的人聽不進後藥。收在一輛車上:淨信的菩薩聲聞「乘佛所說喻如一切支具圓滿妙莊嚴車無上法乘,如善御者……疾疾進趣,無所稽留」。
此子照出的一義
門10 到門15,論本其實只教了一個字的功夫——離言:止的第四行安住「離言唯事」,會通空經靠「所言自性都無所有」一句解開驚怖,忍陀羅尼從一句無義的呪直取「唯有諸法離言自性是自性義」,空三摩地把心安放在離言自性上,法無我的定義是言說自性都無所有,連「無常」都先從言說自性常無講起。真實義品立的離言自性,在這裡長成了六個行門。而後兩喻收尾:假車與真鹿提醒行人——你此刻對「涅槃」「離言」的理解仍是影像,莫執;前藥與後藥提醒行人——莫抱著已懂的法不放。內證行的最後一課,是對自己的理解保持慚愧,而腳下不停。
承衍
本子前承子一(門9 循身觀「遠離言說自性」直開門10「離言唯事」);會通段·空三摩地·法無我皆承真實義品(15-01-04)離言自性·善取空之脈;「現神通、記心、顯說」窺基釋三輪通威力品(15-01-05)。攝決擇分對本品本體的決擇,詳論循身觀真如身、十四相麁重縛、依空修念住與十一後後想縛——連「無自性相想」亦縛(詳考據目二);品界則並錄景師與遁倫二判。品末下接功德品第十八——初持十八品至此十七竟。
Tranquillity and Insight: A Tranquillity of Eight Words, an Insight of Two Kinds of Knowledge
At the close of the first sub-part, the bodhisattva's four foundations of mindfulness contemplate "keeping far from the intrinsic nature as spoken"; at the head of this sub-part, the treatise at once asks: that mind which can contemplate — how is it to be set up? The answer is exceedingly brief: "Herein the bodhisattva, right within all phenomena, discerns nothing at all — this should be known as tranquillity. If, with respect to all phenomena, there is the true knowledge in accord with the real that ranges over the ultimate mode of principle, and the wondrous conventional knowledge that ranges over the immeasurable mode of principle established by convention — this should be known as insight" — tranquillity is discerning nothing at all; insight is the two knowledges, the true and the conventional. Dunlun sums it up: "meditative absorption on a single object, apart from the several discernments, should be known as tranquillity; next, showing the two knowledges, true and conventional, is named insight".
Tranquillity has four practices: that which goes before the ultimate and conventional knowledge; the fruit of the ultimate and conventional knowledge; that which throughout all conceptions of idle proliferation turns without effort; and "right within such an ineffable bare thing, by having no character and discerning nothing at all, stilled in mind, tending toward the equal nature, the single-flavored real nature of all phenomena". The ancient masters take the four practices apart line by line (Jing, Tai, and Kuiji — the three masters — set out together by Dunlun): the first practice is the expedient absorption prior to the two knowledges (Kuiji: "the absorption simultaneous with the applied-effort knowledge"); of the fourth practice, Tai judges, "in the ineffable bare thing that is the other-dependent nature, stilled in mind — this is the true knowledge", and Kuiji, "it says that the right knowledge contemplates the other-dependent, and does not discern that it has any nature, and so enters the meaning of the single-flavored suchness". Kuiji further matches the four practices to grades of the path: "the first, in the applied-effort path before the grounds; the second, from entering the grounds up to before the seventh ground; the third, above the eighth ground up to the ninth; the fourth is done by the tenth ground, entering the buddha-ground" — the four practices of tranquillity are just such a ladder of the absorption-discipline, from before the grounds straight through to the buddha-ground.
Insight's four practices take the path of tranquillity as their forerunner: "with respect to all phenomena, keeping far from the wrong-grasping extreme of over-affirmation, keeping far from the wrong-grasping extreme of under-denial," together with the wondrous insight that accords with the mode of principle established by convention — once again the non-dual Middle Way of the Chapter on the True Reality, reappearing in the gateway of insight.
Skill in Means: Six Inward, Six Outward
The twelve kinds of skill in means: six directed inward, toward cultivating and realizing the buddha-dharmas (a heart of compassion and longing, thorough knowing in accord with the real, delight in the buddha-knowledge, and, on the ground of these three, not forsaking birth-and-death, revolving undefiled, being blazingly diligent); and six directed outward, toward ripening sentient beings (a slight root of goodness draws down an immeasurable fruit; slight effort draws in vast roots of goodness; and the four accomplishments toward the four classes of being — those who spurn, those midway, those already entered in, those already ripened).
The teaching of "a slight root of goodness draws down an immeasurable fruit" is exceedingly plain: exhort a person to give away "down even to the very lowest, a single ball of roasted-grain meal" to a beast, and turn it over toward unsurpassed awakening — "though the thing and the field are lowly, by the force of the turning-over, it draws down an immeasurable fruit". "Slight effort draws in vast roots of goodness" is then a whole string of ways for turning the wrong into the right: replacing the self-starving wrong fast with the eightfold holy fast, replacing austerities with the Middle Way, replacing hurling-oneself-off-cliffs-and-rushing-into-fire with meditative absorption, replacing the Vaidika spell with the Buddha's holy teaching (Kuiji: "this means the illumining spell"); on down to the offering of resolute conviction, sympathetic rejoicing, the six recollections, homage by mind-and-word, the vow of compassion to bear suffering in another's stead, and the laying-bare and repenting of the past — "again and again laying bare what has been transgressed, by employing slight effort, all the karmic obstacles attain release."
According-and-Reconciling: Unknotting the Death-Knot for One Frightened by the Emptiness Scriptures
Within the first of the six kinds of outward means lies the weightiest passage of doctrine in this sub-part. Sentient beings hear the very deep emptiness-associated scriptures the Buddha has spoken — "saying that all phenomena are without intrinsic nature, without any thing, without arising and without ceasing, saying that all phenomena are all equal to open space, all like an illusion or a dream" — and, "unable to understand them according to their meaning, their hearts give rise to fright and dread, defaming all such scriptures, saying they are not what the Buddha spoke". What is the bodhisattva to do? He does not evade, does not change his word, but "reconciles in accord with principle" the Tathāgata's hidden intent:
"This scripture does not say that all phenomena whatsoever are altogether nothing at all, but says that the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken of phenomena is altogether nothing at all" — when the scripture says "without intrinsic nature," what is without is the intrinsic nature that speech sets up, not that all phenomena are spoken of as void-and-nothing. Kuiji reads it by the threefold nature: "it does not say that the two natures, the other-dependent and the rest, are altogether without nature; it says that the wholly-imagined intrinsic-nature-as-spoken is what is absent"; and the absence of the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken is "like a rabbit's horn". "Without any thing" means without the wholly-imagined thing, not without the other-dependent; "without arising and without ceasing" means that the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken, being from the origin nothing at all, has nothing that can arise or cease.
"All equal to open space" — the treatise sets up a simile of its own: within open space forms come and forms go, and if one dispels the forms and form-activities altogether, "only the pure open space of the nature-without-form appears in its character" — so, after the wondrous holy knowledge dispels the idle proliferation of speech, "there is shown forth only the intrinsic-nature of all speech as a non-nature," as the pure character of open space appears. Kuiji: "this figures suchness as being like open space, and the wholly-imagined as being like forms and the rest". "All like an illusion or a dream": an illusion and a dream are "not, as they appear, really existent in accord with the real, and yet the shape and stuff of all illusions and dreams are not altogether nothing at all" — phenomena are "neither existent nor non-existent, their nature not-two." Kuiji: "this figures the other-dependent as being like an illusion and the rest"; each of the three natures is itself neither existent nor non-existent, and the truly-accomplished "is not non-existent — it is present in the ultimate sense".
The closing eight words are precisely the practice-form of the well-grasped emptiness: "he grasps no small part and forsakes no small part, makes no under-denial and makes no over-affirmation" — "if a phenomenon is really existent, he knows it as really existent; if a phenomenon is really non-existent, he knows it as really non-existent; as he knows it, thus does he disclose it". Kuiji: "he does not grasp the wholly-imagined, and does not forsake the two natures … this is named not letting it go to ruin".
The four means that follow (jointly setting up a covenant — "if you can know the kindness of father and mother and reverently make offering to them … then I will give you"; a resolve of a differing part — outwardly displaying hardness and fierceness, "solely to benefit, not out of any remaining resolve"; arising from pressure — a householder-master or a king who by reward and chastisement "forcibly presses him to cultivate"; bestowing kindness and requiting kindness — "if you can … uphold the pure precepts, this alone is called requiting kindness greatly") take the skill in means down to the coarse-grained places of human affairs and worldly dealings. The sixth, the skill in means of ultimate purity, is then the display of the Buddha's own person: birth in Tuṣita, descent to the human realm, leaving home, austerities, realizing awakening, waiting for Brahmā's request, contemplating the world with the buddha-eye, turning the wheel of the dharma — Dunlun notes of its arrangement that "it is short four matters and adds one, the austerities"; Tai supplies, "at Brahmā's first request he does not straightway preach … only later, on reaching the Deer Park, does he preach the dharma".
The Wondrous Dhāraṇīs: How a Spell of No Meaning Opens the Ineffable Acceptance
The four dhāraṇīs: dharma (holding what is heard without forgetting), meaning (holding the meaning without forgetting), spell (the mastery of equipoise empowering the spell-phrases so that they "all become potent"), and the one for attaining the bodhisattva's acceptance. The first three are sustaining forces; the fourth is a strange method of cultivation: a bodhisattva furnished with wondrous wisdom, dwelling alone in an empty place, eating sparingly and sleeping little, "examines and reflects in truth and reality" on the spell-phrases of acceptance the Buddha has spoken — the spell-words being: iṭṭhi miṭṭhi kiṭṭhi bhikṣānti padāni svāhā.
Do you want to rack your brains to seek out the meaning of this spell? The treatise's answer overturns everything: he, "not hearing it from another, naturally penetrates through; he knows that such spell-phrases are altogether without meaning, are the perfectly-accomplished real, and are only meaning-less; he knows in accord with the real that the meaning of these phrases is just what is called meaning-less" — the meaning of the spell is "meaning-less" itself. And by this he turns up one level: "the meaning of the intrinsic nature of all phenomena that is spoken and expressed in all speech is one and all not accomplished as real; there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, and this is the meaning of intrinsic nature" — from a spell that expresses nothing he penetrates the ineffable intrinsic nature of all phenomena, attains the bodhisattva's surpassing acceptance established by the dhāraṇī, and before long shall attain the pure surpassing resolve. Here the ancient masters each lay down a hand: the Tripiṭaka-master (Xuanzang) says, "this takes non-conceptual knowledge as its essence. If so, why is it said to be for 'attaining acceptance'? In the applied-effort path, by upholding-and-reflecting on this spell one swiftly gains the true knowledge and realizes suchness, and so the text below places it at the Ground of Practice-through-Resolute-Conviction"; Kuiji, "a bodhisattva before the grounds recites this spell of no meaning, wishing to remove the grasping-and-reckoning … and by this reflection he is then able to enter true contemplation and realize the bodhisattva's acceptance"; Bei, "the spell-phrases rightly convey that the other-dependent and the perfectly-accomplished are ineffable and unarisen, and so the bodhisattva, reflecting truly, naturally comes to understand the acceptance of the unarisen dharmas. The treatise saying 'without meaning' intends just this". The spell's potency is not in the sound; it is in driving "the mind that seeks a meaning" to the place where the road of language is cut off.
Attaining this dhāraṇī has four qualities for its threshold: having no craving toward desires, not being envious of another's glory, giving equally without regret, and deeply delighting in the bodhisattva-canon — lacking any one, it cannot be.
The Right Vow: From a Single Arousing of the Mind to the Ten Great Vows
The five vows: the vow of arousing the mind (the first arousing), the vow of taking birth (vowing to be born in good destinies that benefit beings), the vow of what is to be practiced, the right vow, and the great vow; the great vow opens out from the right vow into ten kinds — to make offering to immeasurable buddhas; to draw in and guard the right dharma, "transmitting and upholding the dharma-eye so that it is not cut off"; to descend from Tuṣita on down to nirvāṇa; to practice every bodhisattva right practice; to ripen all sentient beings; to display oneself in all worlds; to purify-and-cultivate all buddha-lands; that all bodhisattvas of one resolve enter the Great Vehicle; that no uninverted applied practice be in vain; and swiftly to realize unsurpassed perfect awakening. What is the essence of the vow? The ancient masters set out four readings together (Dunlun): the old masters, following the Satyasiddhi, take acceptance as its essence; Bei takes knowledge as its nature; the Tripiṭaka-master says, "it is a vow provisionally set up upon the willing-desire-and-faith of thought"; Jing takes resolute-conviction, willing, thought, and faith as its essence — Xuanzang's reading too is among them, only recorded, not adjudicated.
The Three Samādhis: Emptiness, Settled upon the Ineffable Intrinsic Nature
The bodhisattva's samādhi of emptiness has but one line for its definition: "he contemplates all things, keeping far from all intrinsic nature as spoken, [seeing] that there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, and his mind is rightly settled" — emptiness is not contemplating "there is nothing whatever," but the mind settled upon the ineffable intrinsic nature. The samādhi of wishlessness: toward the things of the ineffable intrinsic nature, seeing them as defiled by the afflictions and the several sufferings, "toward the world to come, with non-wishing going before, his mind is rightly settled". The samādhi of no-character: toward the things of the ineffable intrinsic nature, "all the characters of discernment and idle proliferation forever extinguished and stilled, knowing in accord with the real, his mind is rightly settled".
Why exactly three? The treatise answers itself: phenomena are of two kinds — the existent (the conditioned and the unconditioned) and the non-existent (self and what belongs to self). Toward the conditioned, because it is loathsome, wishlessness is set up; toward the unconditioned, because one wishes for nirvāṇa, no-character is set up; toward the non-existent, "the bodhisattva neither wishes nor even not-wishes; yet toward the non-existent, the bodhisattva sees it in accord with the real as non-existent — on the basis of this seeing, it should be known, the samādhi of emptiness is established" — the essence of the samādhi of emptiness is a "seeing the non-existent in accord with the real."
Jing sets a placement for this passage: "this shows the Great Vehicle's uncommon three samādhis, spoken in the sense that the non-conceptual knowledge and the associated absorption are of one substance. Below, in terms of the sixteen aspects, it distinguishes the three samādhis that are held in common with the two vehicles" — the three samādhis set up upon the ineffable intrinsic nature are the uncommon gateway of the Great Vehicle; those set up upon the four truths and sixteen aspects are what is held in common with the two vehicles. Kuiji makes a matching of the aspects (emptiness only the latter two aspects under "suffering," and the rest, citing the Xianyang fascicle two), and judges of himself, "the intent of this treatise's text is that, within the true contemplation, these three gates of liberation are distinguished by function-in-meaning".
The Four Dharma-Uddānas: Four Old Sayings That Speak Out the Depth of the Threefold Nature
"There are, further, four dharma-uddānas, which the buddhas and bodhisattvas speak in order to make sentient beings pure": all conditioned activities are impermanent, all conditioned activities are suffering, all phenomena are without a self, nirvāṇa is quiescent. Dunlun leaves a note of correction upon the name: "if it is written with the character wà, it must all be corrected; the old wording is not correct — it is named the four udāna, translated as 'seal' … as it is said, impermanence is the seal-character of the conditioned, suffering the seal-character of the contaminated dharmas, no-self the seal-character of all dharmas, and nirvāṇa-quiescence the seal-character of the unconditioned dharmas"; Kuiji, "this means 'to speak' — namely what the World-Honored One constantly recites and speaks" — "translated as 'seal,'" the ancients say plainly on this point.
Impermanence the treatise gives in two layers: the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken is at all times ever nothing at all, "such conditioned activities being ever unattainable, they are named impermanent" — the impermanence of the wholly-imagined layer is that there is simply no such thing there; the ineffable thing, with not-knowing (ajñāna) as cause, has arising and ceasing to be found — the impermanence of the other-dependent layer is what has arising and ceasing. Jing strings the two layers into one: "grasping speech as having a settled nature is the wholly-imagined; when grasping thus, it perfumes seeds and becomes a cause, giving birth to those other-dependent forms, minds, and the rest, which have arising and forthwith ceasing, and so are named impermanent" — the one thought that grasps speech as real perfumes a seed and gives birth to the other-dependent activities that arise and cease. Beneath the contemplation of the three times (the past without cause and without intrinsic nature; the present with intrinsic nature and without cause; the future with cause and without intrinsic nature ), Woncheuk records two Western glosses: "one says, by the reasoning of the dharma-characters, the three times are established upon a single present dharma … a second says, by the reasoning of consciousness-only the three times are established — namely, upon the substance of the seeing-part in the present there appear the characters of the three times, and so the three times are spoken of, though in truth they are subsumed under the present"; and the Tripiṭaka-master too has two glosses on "the past and the future being alike absent, how are they impermanent" — all set out together.
The passage on the four characters of the instant is a work of subtle dharma-character skill: the prior instant perishes and the new instant arises, and there are arising (the true arising), abiding (arisen but not yet perished), aging (differing from the prior), and ceasing (perishing after arising), while "he does not see that arising and the rest have any separate intrinsic nature" — arising, abiding, aging, ceasing are only the phase-positions of the activities themselves, not four real things existing apart from the activities. Kuiji settles the school-position: "if by the Lesser Vehicle, arising is in the future and the three characters in the present; now by the Great Vehicle, arising and the three characters are in the present, and ceasing in the past," and he answers the doubt of arising and ceasing being simultaneous with the balance simile: "like the two ends of a balance, level and even, and so in a single instant there is arising and there is ceasing". The treatise goes further and breaks the real existence of "arising" by reasoning: if apart from arising there were an arising, there ought to be an "arising of arising," and the arising of activity and the arising of arising, if one, makes the reckoning of arising vain, if different, makes it "not the arising of activity"; and breaks the real existence of "ceasing": if ceasing had arising and ceasing, "if at the time ceasing arises, all activities ought to cease together, and thus by employing slight effort, as though entering the attainment of cessation, the several minds and mental factors would one and all cease; if at the time ceasing ceases, all activities, though already ceased, ought again to arise" — pushing "impermanence" from common sense up to the ultimate sense.
Suffering: the impermanent activities are the ground of the three sufferings — the suffering of conditionedness, the suffering of change, the suffering of suffering. No-self: the twofold no-self — the no-self of the person (it is not that "the dharmas-that-are" are the real self, nor that apart from "the dharmas-that-are" there is a real self; Kuiji: "this means breaking the reckoning of a self as identical-with or different-from the aggregates") and the no-self of phenomena ("that within all that is spoken and expressed, the phenomena that are the intrinsic nature of all speech are altogether nothing at all") — the definition of the no-self of phenomena is still that single "ineffable."
Nirvāṇa-quiescence: the prior cause forever cut off, thereafter ceasing without remainder, utterly not rising. Kuiji's threefold matching: "these are the nirvāṇa-with-remainder and the nirvāṇa-without-remainder. Again, the prior cause forever cut off is in the uninterrupted path; the later cutting-off-without-remainder is in the path of liberation. Again, the prior cause forever cut off is subduing the higher mind in the applied-effort; the later cutting-off-without-remainder is cutting off the seeds".
And thereupon the treatise speaks two long similes. The simile of the prince and the four carts: a prince born in the deep palace has played only with the deer-, ox-, horse-, and elephant-carts his father made up, and so gives rise to a real deer- or horse-notion toward the made-up carts; grown up and out of the palace, seeing real deer and real horses, he then "toward his former resolute conviction follows up with shame" — the palace figures birth-and-death, the young child figures the bodhisattva who has not attained the pure surpassing resolve and the śrāvaka who has not seen the truths, the father figures the buddhas and the great-ground bodhisattvas, the made-up cart figures nirvāṇa as it is proclaimed, and the going-out-and-seeing-in-person figures present realization. The one who has not seen the truths, saying "nirvāṇa is quiescent," is in truth speaking of an image; only after seeing the truths, looking back, does he feel shame that he formerly took the image for the real — yet the treatise does not on this account bid a person shut his mouth, for "he too has attention in accord with principle": the resolute conviction in the image is the road that must be traveled toward present realization. Kuiji further matches the four carts to the four nirvāṇas: "the elephant figures the non-abiding nirvāṇa … the deer, from first to last ever dwelling in the mountain-stillness, figures the originally-pure; the ox, having horns, figures [the nirvāṇa] with remaining basis; the horse, being hornless, figures [the nirvāṇa] without remaining basis" (there is also a matching to the three vehicles, set out alongside).
The simile of the sick one and the good medicine: the former medicine has cured the former illness, a later illness is born and the medicine should be changed, but the sick person, "deeply giving rise to resolute conviction toward the former medicine … is unwilling to cast it away" — the Buddha's dharma-teachings are shallower and deeper, prior and later, and the one who clings to the former medicine cannot take in the later. It is gathered up upon a single cart: the bodhisattvas and śrāvakas of pure faith, "mounting the unsurpassed dharma-vehicle spoken by the Buddha, like a wondrously adorned cart complete in all its parts, like a good driver … swiftly and swiftly press onward, with nothing detaining them".
The One Meaning This Sub-Part Lights Up
From Gate Ten to Gate Fifteen, the treatise in truth teaches the skill of but a single word — the ineffable: the fourth practice of tranquillity settles upon "the ineffable bare thing"; the reconciling of the emptiness scriptures unknots the fright by the one line "the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken is altogether nothing at all"; the acceptance-dhāraṇī takes, from a spell of no meaning, straight hold of "there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, and this is the meaning of intrinsic nature"; the samādhi of emptiness sets the mind upon the ineffable intrinsic nature; the definition of the no-self of phenomena is that the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken is altogether nothing at all; and even "impermanence" is spoken of first from the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken being ever nothing at all. The ineffable intrinsic nature set up in the Chapter on the True Reality has here grown into six gateways of practice. And two similes gather it to a close: the made-up cart and the real deer warn the traveler — your present understanding of "nirvāṇa" and "the ineffable" is still an image, do not cling to it; the former medicine and the later medicine warn the traveler — do not hug the dharma you already understand and refuse to let it go. The last lesson of the practice of inner realization is to keep a sense of shame toward one's own understanding, while the feet beneath do not stop.
Carrying Forward
This sub-part carries forward from the first sub-part (Gate Nine's contemplation of the body along the body, "keeping far from the intrinsic nature as spoken", opens directly into Gate Ten's "ineffable bare thing"); the reconciling passage, the samādhi of emptiness, and the no-self of phenomena all carry forward the vein of the ineffable intrinsic nature and the well-grasped emptiness of the Chapter on the True Reality (15-01-04); "displaying supernormal powers, mind-reading, and disclosing preaching," which Kuiji glosses as "the three spheres", runs through to the Chapter on Might (15-01-05). The Section on Ascertainment treats the substance of this chapter through the contemplation of the body along the suchness-body, the fourteen kinds of coarse-and-heavy bond of character, the cultivation of the foundations of mindfulness in dependence on emptiness, and the eleven successive conception-bonds — where even "the conception of a characterless-of-intrinsic-nature" is a bond (detailed in Apparatus Heading II); the two judgments of the chapter-boundary, Jing's and Dunlun's, are set out together. The chapter then gives way to the Chapter on Qualities, the eighteenth — with this, seventeen of the eighteen chapters of the Preliminary Sustaining are complete.
考據Apparatus
本子承門10–15(止觀·方便善巧·四陀羅尼·正願·三三摩地·四種法嗢拕南)——離言自性一線之行門總匯:止之第四行「離言唯事」、會通空經之如來密意、忍陀羅尼「無義是圓成實」、空三摩地「唯有諸法離言自性」、法無我「一切言說自性諸法都無所有」。
一、科判定位
| 科判系統 | 此子之位 |
|---|---|
| 玄奘 T1579 本地分 | 菩提分品第十七(之二後半+之三)門10–15〔0539c24–0545b21〕(卷四十五–卷四十六;之三卷題 0544a06–a07 恰在門15 前;下接功德品第十八品題 0545b23) |
| 論文自身 | 門10 止觀〔0539c24「此中菩薩即於諸法無所分別,當知名止」·科目界 0539c23 末〕(止四行〔0539c26–0540a02〕:智前行/智果/戲論想中無功用轉/離言唯事…趣向一切法平等性一味實性〔0539c29–0540a02〕·觀四行:離增益邊/離損減邊〔0540a05〕)→ 門11 方便善巧〔0540a10〕(依內六依外六〔0540a11〕·少善根感無量果:一麨團〔0540b03〕迴向力〔0540b05〕·少功力引廣大善根:八支聖齋〔0540b10〕中道離二邊〔0540b14〕投巖赴火〔0540b15〕吠地迦呪〔0540b18〕空性妙法一剎那淨信〔0540b21〕·六種:隨順會通〔0540c27〕共立要契〔0541b24〕異分意樂〔0541c26〕逼迫所生〔0542a21〕施恩報恩〔0542b03〕究竟清淨〔0542b13〕;會通密意段:不解密意心生驚怖〔0541a13–a17〕·「此經不說一切諸法都無所有,但說諸法所言自性都無所有」〔0541a21〕·虛空喻〔0541a28–0541b10〕·幻夢喻〔0541b13–b17〕·不取不捨〔0541b19–b21〕)→ 門12 妙陀羅尼〔0542c16〕(法〔0542c19〕義〔0542c23〕呪〔0542c26〕能得菩薩忍〔0543a01〕;呪詞 0543a07–a08·無義是圓成實〔0543a11〕·唯有諸法離言自性是自性義〔0543a17〕·勝解行地勝忍〔0543a23〕·四功德〔0543b02〕)→ 門13 正願〔0543b08〕(五願·十大願〔0543b17 起〕)→ 門14 三三摩地〔0543c07〕(空:離言自性心正安住·無願〔0543c09〕·無相〔0543c15〕·唯立三問答:法有二種有非有〔0543c17–c24〕)→ 門15 四種法嗢拕南〔0544a08〕(無常:言說自性常無〔0544a19〕離言事生滅〔0544a21〕三世觀〔0544a23 起〕剎那四相〔0544b04 起〕破生生〔0544b27〕破滅相〔0544c03〕·苦三苦〔0544c13〕·二無我〔0544c16–c23〕·涅槃寂靜:王子四車喻〔0545a01〕病者良藥喻〔0545b03〕妙莊嚴車〔0545b19〕) |
| 遁倫《瑜伽論記》T1828 | 本子當〔0555c07–0560a08〕(門15 在卷十一之下·論本第四十六〔0558a06 起〕);止觀四行景泰基三師〔0555c10–0556a25〕;陀羅尼景基三藏備〔0556c27–0557b06〕;願體四說〔0557b08–b12〕;三三摩地景「大乘不共」判〔0557c02〕;嗢拕南譯名〔0558a10〕;三世西方兩釋〔0558b11–b26〕;四相〔0558b26–0559a03〕;王子喻基四涅槃配〔0559c12〕 |
| 窺基《略纂》T1829 | 本子當〔0153c29–0156c25〕(0155b29 卷界標「第四十六卷 菩提分法第十七之三」);止四行約位判〔0154a20–a22〕;會通三性配〔0154b23–c21〕;陀羅尼出體〔0154c22–0155a03〕;三三摩地行相攝配〔0155b05–b19〕;四相大條〔0155c12–0156a28〕;破生滅〔0156a29–c08〕;涅槃三重配〔0156c13–c17〕 |
| 最勝子 T1580 | 無品釋(「三摩地」十五見皆十七地地名層·「嗢拕南」三見皆十七地攝頌名義·陀羅尼 0 見) |
二、異譯·經內平行對勘
(一) 二家漢譯(玄奘 · 曇無讖 · 求那跋摩)
| 義點 | 玄奘 T1579 | 曇無讖 T1581 菩提品第十七 | 求那跋摩 T1582(十八+十九品) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 門10 止觀定義 | 「即於諸法無所分別,當知名止。若於諸法勝義理趣如實真智,及於無量安立理趣世俗妙智,當知名觀」〔0539c24 起〕 | 「若彼菩薩於此法如是不起妄想者,是名為止。及彼如實知第一義,及無量處方便知法,是名為觀」〔0930a05–a07〕(不立獨立問端,附三十七道分段末) | 「菩薩若知不以覺觀觀三十七品,是名舍摩他。菩薩若知法界真實不可宣說,是名毘婆舍那」〔0994c28–0995a02〕(止觀作音譯) |
| 門11 十二種 | 依內六依外六〔0540a11〕 | 「云何菩薩巧方便?略說十二種,為起內佛法有六種、為外成熟眾生有六種」〔0930a16–a17〕 | 「善方便者有十二種,內六種、外六種」〔0995a09–a11〕 |
| 門11 六種名 | 隨順會通/共立要契/異分意樂/逼迫所生/施恩報恩/究竟清淨〔0540c27 起〕 | 「一者隨順;二者立要;三者異相;四者逼迫;五者報恩;六者清淨」〔0932c17–c19〕(此段在「菩提分品之餘」——門11 被四攝重出段〔0930c02–0932c09〕攔腰截斷,詳子一目二) | 「一者隨他;二者無障;三者不動;四者心相似;五者報恩;六者清淨」〔0995b16〕;且「無障」「不動」合說收於一句「是名無障不動」〔0996a12〕,與玄奘要契/異分/逼迫三門開合不對齊 |
| 門12 四陀羅尼 | 法/義/呪/能得菩薩忍〔0542c16 起〕 | 「一者法陀羅尼;二者義陀羅尼;三者呪術陀羅尼;四者得菩薩忍陀羅尼」〔0934a03〕 | 「一者法陀羅尼;二者義陀羅尼;三者辭陀羅尼;四者忍陀羅尼」〔0996b23〕——第三名「辭」而內容實為神呪:「受持神呪讀誦通利利益眾生」〔0996c01〕;並增出持呪五法:「一者不食肉;二者不飲酒;三者不食五辛;四者不婬;五者不淨之家不在中食」〔0996c02–c04〕(地持、玄奘所無) |
| 忍陀羅尼呪詞 | 壹胝蜜胝吉胝毘羼底鉢陀膩莎訶〔0543a07–a08〕 | 「伊致 密致 吉胝鼻 羼提跛大㗩波呵」〔0934a17〕 | 「乙致 蜜致 䩭致毘 羼提 般檀那 莎呵」〔0996c10–c11〕 |
| 門13 願 | 發心/受生/所行/正/大願五種+十大願〔0543b08 起〕 | 「一者發心願;二者生願;三者境界願;四者平等願;五者大願」〔0934b10–b11〕;「又說十種大願」〔0934b16〕十數足,「十者願成無上正覺」〔0934b22〕 | 「一者發心發願;二者有發願;三者行發願;四者善發願;五者大發願」〔0996c25–c26〕;大願無十數——「大發願」僅連串鋪陳約六事〔0997a01–a09〕 |
| 門14 空三摩地 | 「觀一切事,遠離一切言說自性,唯有諸法離言自性,心正安住」〔0543c07〕 | 「菩薩離一切言說自性,觀無言說自性心住,是名空三昧」〔0934b24〕 | 「菩薩深觀一切諸法有可說性,是可說性不可說性中無,故名空三昧」〔0997a10–a11〕 |
| 門15 四法嗢拕南 | 無常/苦/無我/涅槃寂靜〔0544a08 起〕 | 「四憂檀那法」:「一切行無常是憂檀那法……涅槃寂滅是憂檀那法」〔0934c10–c12〕 | 「四法」=「一切有為法無常、苦、無我、涅槃寂靜」〔0997b01〕,名「優陀那」;釋名「能作上者名優陀那,增長善法名優陀那」〔0997b04〕 |
| 涅槃段譬喻 | 王子四車喻〔0545a01〕·病者良藥喻〔0545b03〕 | (簡) | 擴充:非象馬生象馬想之喻+病者服藥方信之喻,並說「如來實常」〔0998a10 起〕,篇幅遠逾二本 |
二家唯錄不判。三本呪詞音寫互異(各依其時音);玄奘本呪詞大正原書作陀羅尼分書段式並附音註「丁里反」(見目二(三) 0543002)。
(二) 經內平行=攝決擇分〈決擇菩提分品〉本體段
品17 本體之決擇=0712c07–0713b01(其前 0710c29–0712c06 為戒品三聚·施等六度重決,各歸其品)。四段:
- 循身觀真如身〔0712c07〕:「云何菩薩於身住循身觀?謂於相身循環觀真如身。如於身,於受、心、法,隨其所應,當知亦爾。」正斷決擇〔0712c10〕:「謂於真如境繫心令住,為令一切相及麁重未得現前……」——四正斷之「惡不善法」決擇為相縛·麁重縛二縛(與《解深密》「眾生為相縛,及為麁重縛」〔本論卷七十五引 0716b16〕同一術語系)。
- 道品一貫次第〔0712c15–c23〕:念住(繫心置所緣)→正斷(令心安住)→神足(定圓滿)→根力(「加行道中,根是下品,力是上品」〔0712c20〕)→覺支(通達實際)→道支→證菩提。
- 十四種相麁重縛〔0712c24〕:「相麁重縛,當知差別有十四種。一、根縛。二、境縛。三、有情展轉更相愛縛。四、建立縛,謂器世間……十四、法遍知增上慢縛。」
- 六種妄想縛·十一後後想縛〔0713a03–b01〕:「依空勤修念住菩薩,略於六種妄想縛中,當令其心速得解脫」;「復有十一後後想縛」〔0713a12〕;收句「於此想縛得解脫故,一切想縛皆得解脫」〔0713a29–b01〕——十一後後想縛之末,連「無自性相想」亦縛(遁倫釋〔T42n1828 0770b04〕:「唯知諸法無決定性,亦由情帶取執說名為縛」)。
品界古德二判(穩定徵引·並錄):遁倫〔T42n1828 0770b07–b10〕:「若依景師釋,此下乃至八殊勝來猶是決擇是菩提分法品,其深密經文全是決擇功德品。雖有此判,今還依前判。玄師親承三藏有此傳也」——0713b01 以下(惡取空破~八殊勝)景師判仍屬決擇菩提分品;遁倫依前判(0713b01 起即功德品決擇),並記此判承三藏之傳。兩判並錄,本考據依 CBETA 科判以 0713b01 為界。
另攝決擇他處可資對照者(皆非品17 專章):真實義品決擇五事章「若無差別,總說為空、無願、無相……若唯以三摩地名而宣說者,當知此中,唯修所成為性……若唯以解脫門名而宣說者,當知此中,唯出世間修所成為性」〔0698c06–c14·「正智通三種,是空所行境」0698c09〕——空/三摩地/解脫門三名寬狹之決擇,門14 對照錨。
(三) 校勘(大正原書校記全枚舉·本子段 0539c24–0545b21)
本子段大正原書校記共 26 條(含卷品題 2+願文題記 1+正文 23)。底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印);本子無一條升定本案,異讀並錄備考:
| 註號 | 錨 | 底本【大】 | 異讀 | 語境 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0539009 | 0539c29 | 相 | 想【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 止四行第四「由無有相無所分別」(四本作「無有想」·義理眼句異讀·並錄) |
| 0540003 | 0540b03 | 一 | 二【元】【明】 | 最下唯一麨團(「麨」原書缺字 CB00595,底本正字化) |
| 0540004 | 0540b09 | 齋 | 齊【聖】* | 邪齋戒 |
| 0540006 | 0540c19 | 情 | 性【聖】 | 有情 |
| 0540007 | 0540c27 | 於 | 隨於【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 隨順會通起首 |
| 0541001 | 0541b13 | 如 | 知【宋】【元】【明】【聖】 | 幻夢喻段 |
| 0541002 | 0541c02 | 域 | 役【宋】,城【元】【明】【宮】 | 共立要契·王事域事 |
| 0541003 | 0541c20 | 令 | 爾【宋】【元】【明】 | 要契段 |
| 0542001 | 0542a22 | 主 | 正【元】 | 或為家主 |
| 0542002 | 0542a24 | 正 | 止【元】 | 能正教誡 |
| 0542003 | 0542b04 | 多少 | 少多【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 隨力多少 |
| 0542004 | 0542b05 | 厄 | 危【聖】 | 濟厄難 |
| 0542005 | 0542c01 | 今 | 令【三】【宮】【聖】 | 究竟清淨段 |
| 0543001 | 0543a07 | — | 胝毘間宋元明宮聖五本連續而毘下間空 | 呪詞連書格式(五本「吉胝毘」連書) |
| 0543002 | 0543a07 | 里 | 理【三】【宮】【聖】 | 呪詞音註「丁里反」之「里」 |
| 0543003 | 0543b04 | 姤 | 妬【三】【宮】【聖】 | 不生姤忌 |
| 0543004 | 0543b22 | 正 | 大【元】【明】 | 「當知是名第二正願」(十大願之第二;元明作「第二大願」與前後九願一律——底本從 CBETA 承字存「正願」〔大正原印同〕,異讀並錄) |
| 0543005 | 0543b24 | 願於 | 於願【聖】 | 第三大願 |
| 0543006 | 0543c26 | 三 | 〔三〕-【聖】 | 三三摩地結段 |
| 0543007 | 0543c28 | — | 此下聖本有光明皇后願文 | 卷四十五末(傳本題記) |
| 0544001 | 0544a06 | 第十五 | 〔第十五〕-【明】* | 之三卷題 |
| 0544002 | 0544a08 | 拕 | 柁【三】【宮】 | 法嗢拕南 |
| 0544003 | 0544a27 | 猶 | 由【三】【宮】 | 無常三世觀段 |
| 0544004 | 0544c02 | 老 | 若【明】 | 四相段 |
| 0544005 | 0544c26 | 體 | 能【元】 | 涅槃其體寂靜 |
| 0545001 | 0545b06 | 爾 | 今【聖】 | 病者喻段 |
另大正編者附梵文擬註(0540001 止觀 · 0540002 方便善巧 · 0540005 吠地迦呪)——現代編者擬補,非古德所傳,不採、不入術語目。
三、聖教義之經據(眼·重)
本子=離言自性一線之行門總匯,古德明文密集:
- 止第四行·離言唯事〔0539c29–0540a02〕:「即於如是離言唯事,由無有相無所分別,其心寂靜,趣向一切法平等性、一味實性」〔0539c29–0540a02〕——泰云「於離言唯事依他性其心寂靜是真智也」〔T42n1828 0556a01〕;基云「說正智觀依他,不分別有性,故入一味真如義」〔T43n1829 0154a16–a17〕;窺基四行約位判:「第一、在地前加行道中;第二、入地已去乃至七地以前;第三、在八地以上乃至九地;第四、十地為之,入於佛地」〔0154a20–a22〕。
- ★會通空經·如來密意〔0541a21〕:「此經不說一切諸法都無所有,但說諸法所言自性都無所有」——窺基三性配:「不說依他等二性都無性,說遍計所言自性是無也」〔T43n1829 0154b25〕;「如此言說所說自性如兔角故……言無事,即無遍計事也,非無依他」〔0154c01〕;「此喻真如如空,遍計如色等」〔0154c05〕;「喻依他如幻等」〔0154c09〕;三性各非有非無「非無,勝義有也」〔0154c19〕;「不取遍計,不捨二性……名無失壞」〔0154c20〕。(遁倫錄同文〔T42n1828 0556b18–c14〕。)
- ★忍陀羅尼·無義是圓成實〔0543a11·0543a17〕:「都無有義,是圓成實,但唯無義」「一切言說所說諸法自性之義皆不成實,唯有諸法離言自性是自性義」——三藏云(遁倫錄):「此以無分別智為體。若爾,何故言能得忍?此於加行道中,持思此呪故速得真智證於真如,故下文在勝解行地」〔T42n1828 0557a08–a10〕(略纂錄作「法師云」〔T43n1829 0155a01–a03〕,兩傳互證=玄奘義);備云:「呪句正詮依他圓成離言無生故,菩薩諦思自然得解無生法忍。論云:無義意在於此」〔T42n1828 0557b04–b06〕;窺基:「此釋上無義是圓成實義……但由此呪下無所詮故……而證圓成實」〔T43n1829 0155a21 起〕。
- ★三三摩地·大乘不共:空三摩地「觀一切事,遠離一切言說自性,唯有諸法離言自性,心正安住」〔0543c07〕——景云:「此明大乘不共三三摩地,以無分別智相應定數一體義說。下約十六行辨三三摩地與二乘共」〔T42n1828 0557c02–c04〕;基自判:「此論文意,在真觀中義用分立此三解脫門,若斷惑,唯空行」〔T43n1829 0155b15〕;攝決擇對照:空/三摩地/解脫門三名寬狹〔0698c06–c14〕。
- ★三世唯識讀(西方傳):測云(遁倫錄)〔T42n1828 0558b14–b26〕:「於此文中西方兩釋。一云,法相道理於一現在法建立三世……二云:唯識道理建立三世,謂於現在見分體上有三世相而得顯現,故說三世,據實是現在攝」;又「三藏兩解」〔0558b22〕過未無而名無常之二釋。
- 法無我〔0544c21–c22〕:「於一切言說事中,一切言說自性諸法都無所有」;攝決擇·依空修念住〔0713a03〕:「依空勤修念住菩薩,略於六種妄想縛中,當令其心速得解脫」——空(離言)貫念住。
- 基師·王子喻四涅槃配(遁倫錄)〔T42n1828 0559c12–c14〕:「喻四涅槃,象喻無住涅槃……謂鹿始終常居山靜,喻本來淨。牛有角故,喻有餘依。馬無角故,喻無餘依。」
四、諸家異釋(古德·標宗)
藏內古德涉本子:遁倫(景泰基測+三藏三則+備師二則+遁倫自判二則;遠法師本品無出現)·窺基(有文/有義/法師云/詳曰之式)·最勝子(無品釋)。諸說唯錄不判。
(一) 止觀四行——景/泰/基三師逐句(遁倫錄;窺基自著同)
遁倫總標〔T42n1828 0555c07–c10〕:「言無所分別,當知名止者,靜慮一緣離諸分別當知名止,次明真俗二智名觀。」四行止〔0555c10–0556a08〕:第一行 景云「先起於定依定修智名智前行,亦可先起於智依智修定」/基云「即無分別智、後得智之前方便定,即與加行智同時定」〔T43n1829 0154a01〕;第三行 景云「明離惡也」/泰云「是俗諦智也」/基云「轉即轉滅,謂正智普於一切戲論想中皆能轉滅」;第四行 景云「明無分別定正證真如」/泰云「則於如是俗諦中推求言說分別性不可得,於離言唯事依他性其心寂靜是真智也」〔0556a01〕/基云(一味真如,見目三)+約位四判〔T43n1829 0154a20–a22〕。四行觀〔T42n1828 0556a09–a25〕:景云逐句(第二句知遍計無相·第三句了知圓成有·第四句依他差別觀)/泰云「四止道前方便思量觀察故名四觀也,從四觀後任運而轉不作意思量即名四止」/基云「此四智地地皆有,別配稍難」〔T43n1829 0154a29〕。
(二) 會通密意三性配——窺基(遁倫錄同文)
〔T43n1829 0154b23–c21;T42n1828 0556b18–c14〕見目三★。另隨順會通分界〔T43n1829 0154b09–b18〕:「明隨順;以下明會通。隨順,順彼;會通,為釋經說」;「現神通、記心、顯說」等者,「即三輪也」〔0154b18〕;「謂有三摩地,能遍緣一切,即一切種智所依定也」〔0154b19–b22·遁倫「則一切種智定也」〔T42n1828 0556b17〕〕。
(三) 一月不食·投巖赴火·吠地迦呪——窺基訓(遁倫錄同)
〔T43n1829 0154b05–b08〕:論言「一月不食」是外道計;「投巖、赴火」是尼揵子計;論言「婆羅門吠陀迦呪」者,「此云明呪也。究竟淨,謂為無漏出世淨也」。
(四) 十資身具·究竟八相——遁倫(含文本判語一則·泰云一則)
「十資身具者,相傳云:如下田宅等以為十種,此說不然。今依意識相應地文」〔T42n1828 0556c14–c15〕;究竟清淨八相「文中,闕少四事,加一苦行」〔0556c20〕(對八相成道之開合,據實錄);梵王請法 泰云:「為壞計等一類有情故,於菩提樹下梵王初請不則為說,以佛眼觀五拘隣等有機故,後至鹿園方說法也」〔0556c23 起〕。
(五) 四陀羅尼出體——景/基/三藏(遁倫錄;窺基自著「法師云」同源)
〔T42n1828 0556c27–0557a10〕:景云「法義呪三持用如量智為性,忍持通用如理如量二智為性。若約法數出體,法義二持即用念慧為性,呪持一種用自在定為性,以禪定力加被諸呪文句令有神驗。第四忍持即用智慧為性」;基云「能得忍陀羅尼者,以無分別智為忍體,即證真如。能得忍者,即加行智」〔窺基自著 T43n1829 0154c22–0155a01〕;三藏云「此以無分別智為體。若爾,何故言能得忍?此於加行道中,持思此呪故速得真智證於真如,故下文在勝解行地」〔0557a08–a10〕——署名互證:略纂此條作「法師云」〔T43n1829 0155a01〕,論記明署「三藏云」=玄奘,兩傳互證。
(六) 忍陀羅尼修相——景/基/備三師(遁倫錄)
〔T42n1828 0557a10–b06〕:基云「言成就自然堅固因行者,謂在地前。具足妙慧者,即成就趣出世妙慧也」〔0557a13 起〕(窺基自著牒文作「成熟自然堅固因行」,釋云「是忍云因,不可動故」〔T43n1829 0155a04–a05〕——兩傳並錄);泰云「空寂之處眼所遊略無物可觀,故名空無有物見路而行也」;景云「不畜資緣見路而行,夜無他涉待曉方進」;廣明修相:景云「謂依於無義呪句正起思惟,類知一切,言說自性皆不可得名為通達……都無有義是圓成實」;基云「謂此呪無有義,但唯有名。謂地前菩薩誦此無義之呪,欲除計執……由此思惟故,便能入真觀,證菩薩忍」〔T43n1829 0155a15 起〕;備云(見目三★)。
(七) 願體四說——古師/備師/三藏/景(遁倫錄,並陳)
〔T42n1828 0557b08–b12〕:「論願體性諸師不同,有古師依成實以忍為體。備師云:以智為性。故此論云:智於後後希求故。三藏云:思欲信上假立願也。景師云:用勝解欲思信為體。」另受生願何不言惡趣,基師解二意〔0557b12 起;略纂自著〔T43n1829 0155a28–b04〕:「一、謂善趣利多,惡趣利少,略不論也;二、順八相唯在善趣故。又惡趣無自在,為王等化故」〕;十大願「案地經辨十願與此論大義同」(引《十地經》《十地經論》〔0557b12–c01〕)。
(八) 三三摩地——景(不共判)/基(行相攝配·引顯揚)
景云〔T42n1828 0557c02–c04〕見目三★。基云〔T43n1829 0155b05–b19;遁倫錄同 0557c04–c17〕:「此中空意,若相見道,唯苦下二行;無願文意,由有煩惱等言,故唯集四行、苦二行;無相文意,由有永滅寂靜言,唯滅下四」;備列異說「有義:空行若約斷惑,通四諦」,「如《顯揚》第二卷」〔0155b12〕「如《對法抄》」;基自判「又此論文意,在真觀中義用分立此三解脫門,若斷惑,唯空行」〔0155b15〕。建立門遁倫補:「云我及我所,名為非有者,地持云:無我我所名無有」〔T42n1828 0557c17–c18〕;結文遁倫「今解」〔0557c18–0558a02〕。
(九) 嗢拕南譯名——遁倫(正名條)/窺基
遁倫〔T42n1828 0558a10–a16〕:「自下第十五解四烏拕南,若作嗢字皆須改正,舊語不正,名四優陀那,翻名為印,今翻名說,即世尊常誦說……隨義傍翻亦得名印,或名總略義或名標相。如說無常是有為標相,苦是有漏法標相,無我是一切法標相,涅槃寂靜是無為法標相。若名嗢拕南則名集施。」窺基〔T43n1829 0155c01–c05〕:「此云說也,即世尊常誦說。此若嗢柁南,名攝散,即以略偈而攝長行……此義似無問自說也。」
(十) 無常三義·三世——景/測(西方兩釋)/三藏(兩解)
〔T42n1828 0558a23–b26〕:景云「此明依他自相不可言說。如眼證色……如飲冷水,證者自知必言說之不稱所證……隨其言說執有定性遍計所執,如此執時熏種成因,生彼依他色心等法有生即滅,故名無常」;測云「由不了知如所有性等二種真實及世間等四種真實故,起諸戲論無明法執」;三世條 測云「於此文中西方兩釋……二云:唯識道理建立三世,謂於現在見分體上有三世相而得顯現」〔0558b14 起〕;「三藏兩解」〔0558b22〕:「一云,未來本無以當有故故名無常……第二解云:當有名未來,正有之時當有無故名無常。」
(十一) 剎那四相——景/測/基/遁倫(今更有釋)
〔T42n1828 0558b26–0559a03〕:景云「三相現在同體,義說滅相過去。問曰:若爾即違經說即生即老即滅之言?解云:未必四相同時名為即也」;測云「述西方兩釋。一云,三相無前後……一云,三相有前後」〔0558c04〕;基云「若即現在與異同時而名滅者,則滅是無法……如秤兩頭,平等平等,故一剎那有生有滅」〔窺基自著 T43n1829 0155c12–0156a28:「若依小乘,生在未來,三相在現在;今依大乘,生等三相在現在,滅在過去」·秤喻 0156a11·攝住入異/攝異入住二義·文末自注「下〈決擇〉五十三及〈本地〉第三卷抄」〕;遁倫今更有釋:「滅相約位雖在過去而假立為相者,猶在現在將滅之時……以此義故一剎那具有四相。然此論中約實無位說」〔0558c28 起〕。
(十二) 破生生·破滅相——窺基(內部「法師/義曰」駁議一則)
〔T43n1829 0156a29–c08〕:「以攝法遮法故……故遮遍遮」;「破生色之生亦應有生,即小乘中小生也」〔0156b09–b11〕;「非行生生即小生也,是行生生即大生也……故二生異,不應道理」〔0156b20 起;遁倫錄基師解同〔T42n1828 0559a03–b20〕〕;滅相科判「法師:上來一重破訖,次下第二別破滅相。義曰:不然……下舉後滅破,總是一翻」〔0156b26 起〕——基駁「法師」科判,唯錄。「若滅為生所生時,一切諸法皆應不用功力而自然滅,如入滅定」〔0156c02–c03〕。宗判(遁倫):「若依薩婆多,法外別有非色非心四相之體,別體同時而用有先後。若依成實,同體各時……今大乘說……」〔T42n1828 0559a03 起〕。
(十三) 二無我·涅槃三重配——窺基/遁倫(相傳解正誤一則)
無我:窺基「謂破即蘊、異蘊計我也」〔T43n1829 0156c11〕;遁倫「舊論云:於一切法有為無為無我我我所……相傳解云:無我者人無我,我我所者法無我,今則不爾……謂破則蘊異計我也」〔T42n1828 0559b21–b26〕。涅槃「先因永斷,後無餘滅」三重配(窺基〔T43n1829 0156c13–c17〕):「即有餘、無餘涅槃也。又先因永斷,在無間道;後無餘斷,在解脫道。又先因永斷,在加行伏上心;後無餘斷,斷種子。」
(十四) 王子四車喻——有釋(三乘配)/基師(四涅槃配)並陳(遁倫錄)
〔T42n1828 0559b26–c21〕:「言鹿、牛、馬、象者,有釋:鹿居山藪故喻獨覺,牛遲、馬疾,喻彼聲聞有鈍、有利。象,喻菩薩。基師云:喻四涅槃,象喻無住涅槃……謂鹿始終常居山靜,喻本來淨。牛有角故,喻有餘依。馬無角故,喻無餘依」〔0559c12–c14〕;病人喻六段科。
(十五) 法教正教三句——景/泰/基三家(遁倫錄;窺基自著同)
〔T42n1828 0559c21–0560a08〕:景云「初三句者,下名正教……法教是總,下三句別」;泰云「初三句為說菩薩乘三品……方便教名法教,根本教名正教也」;基云「上極等三句一釋是聞慧,深極等三句是思慧,勝極等三句是修慧……又前三慧中,一一皆有法教正教等三句,次第配之」〔窺基自著 T43n1829 0156c18–c25〕。
五、術語
| 漢 | 古德傳梵(音寫·發音輔助) | 所徵 | 精確義 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 嗢拕南/烏拕南/優陀那 | 音寫字(遁倫正名:「若作嗢字皆須改正,舊語不正,名四優陀那」〔T42n1828 0558a10〕) | 〔本論 0544a08〕 | 遁倫:翻名為印/說/總略義/標相;集施。窺基:「此云說也」〔T43n1829 0155c01〕 |
| 陀羅尼 | 音寫字 | 〔本論 0542c16〕 | 總持;四種(法/義/呪/能得菩薩忍) |
| 忍陀羅尼呪詞 | 壹胝蜜胝吉胝毘羼底鉢陀膩莎訶(大正附音註「丁里反」·校記 0543001/0543002) | 〔本論 0543a07–a08〕 | 「都無有義,是圓成實」——呪無所詮,正詮離言(備云「呪句正詮依他圓成離言無生」) |
| 吠地迦呪 | 音寫字(窺基「此云明呪也」〔T43n1829 0154b07〕) | 〔本論 0540b18〕 | 婆羅門吠陀呪法 |
| 覩史多天 | 音寫字 | 〔本論 0542b15〕 | 兜率天(究竟清淨方便善巧八相之首) |
| 摩怛理迦 | 音寫字 | 〔本論 0543b07〕 | 本母(菩薩藏摩怛理迦) |
| 舍摩他·毘婆舍那 | 音寫字(T1582 止觀作音譯〔0994c28–0995a02〕) | 〔對勘〕 | 止·觀 |
六、譬喻·修辭
(一) 虛空喻(會通「皆等虛空」)——〔0541a28–0541b10〕色色業除遣、唯無色性清淨虛空相現:喻以妙聖智遣言說戲論、唯離言事顯現;窺基「此喻真如如空,遍計如色等」〔T43n1829 0154c04–c05〕。
(二) 幻夢喻(會通「皆如幻夢」)——〔0541b13–b17〕「非如顯現如實是有,亦非一切幻夢形質都無所有……非有非無,其性無二」;窺基「喻依他如幻等」〔0154c09〕。
(三) 兔角(窺基釋喻)——〔T43n1829 0154c01〕「如此言說所說自性如兔角故」:遍計所言自性畢竟無之古德習用喻。
(四) 一麨團(少善根感無量果)——〔0540b03〕「乃至最下唯一麨團,施鄙穢田乃至蠢動傍生之類……由迴向力,感無量果」:至微之施緣迴向成無量。
(五) 秤兩頭(剎那生滅同時)——〔T43n1829 0156a11〕「如秤兩頭,平等平等,故一剎那有生有滅」:窺基釋喻。
(六) 王子四車喻(涅槃勝解)——〔0545a01–0545b02〕假鹿牛馬象車→真鹿牛馬象:喻未見諦者於涅槃唯依相似影像起勝解,見諦方知,追愧先解;基師配四涅槃(象=無住)〔T42n1828 0559c12–c14〕。喻依段「先為假作鹿、牛等車,喻為宣說涅槃鹿相」〔0545a20–a21〕——「鹿相」底本原文如此(大正無校記;兩疏無牒文),與下句「次為讚說真實鹿等」〔0545a21〕對映(假鹿之相/真實鹿),白話存底本字。
(七) 病者良藥喻(法教漸次)——〔0545b03–b18〕前藥治前病、後病須後藥、病者執前藥不捨:喻於佛所說前後法教不能捨執進修;收於「妙莊嚴車無上法乘,如善御者……疾疾進趣,無所稽留」〔0545b19–b21〕。
七、互讀
- 子一(15-01-17-01):門9 循身觀「遠離言說自性」〔0539c10〕直開本子門10 止「離言唯事」〔0539c29〕;窺基三性配釋(子一目三★)為本子會通段三性配之同源。
- 真實義品(15-01-04):會通密意段「但說諸法所言自性都無所有」〔0541a21〕+「不取少分、不捨少分」〔0541b19〕=真實義品離言自性·無二中道·善取空之行門化;空三摩地〔0543c07〕同線。
- 威力品(15-01-05):「現神通、記心、顯說」窺基釋「即三輪也」〔T43n1829 0154b18〕。
- 成熟品/攝事品(15-01-06/15):依外六種(趣入/成熟/解脫)與成熟品六門·攝事品四攝行相相貫。
- 攝決擇分:品17 本體決擇 0712c07–0713b01(目二(二));三摩地/解脫門名寬狹 0698c06–c14;品界景師/遁倫(承三藏)二判並錄〔T42n1828 0770b07–b10〕。
- 解深密經:相縛·麁重縛術語系(本論卷七十五引〔0716b16〕)——止觀章廣決在彼(依遁倫判屬功德品決擇範圍,穩定徵引)。
- 異譯:曇無讖 菩提品第十七(門11 被四攝重出段截斷·十大願足十)·求那跋摩 十八/十九兩品(大願無十數·持呪五法特有·如來實常段擴充〔0998a10〕)——對勘見目二。
互讀以穩定徵引(藏經號·頁錨)為主。
八、校本定位
- 玄奘 T1579(底本):本子〔0539c24–0545b21〕,門界(逐錨自驗):門10 首句 0539c24(科目界 0539c23 末) · 止四行 0539c26–0540a02 · 觀四行 0540a04–a08 · 門11 0540a10(六種 0540c27/0541b24/0541c26/0542a21/0542b03/0542b13·會通密意 0541a13–0541b21)· 門12 0542c16(法 0542c19·義 0542c23·呪 0542c26·忍 0543a01·呪詞 0543a07–a08·圓成實 0543a11·離言自性是自性義 0543a17·勝解行地 0543a23·四功德 0543b02)· 門13 0543b08(十大願 0543b17 起)· 門14 0543c07(無願 0543c09·無相 0543c15·建立 0543c17–c24)· 之三卷題 0544a06–a07 · 門15 0544a08(三義釋名 0544a13–a17·無常 0544a19–0544c12·苦 0544c13·無我 0544c16–c23·涅槃 0544c24 起·王子喻 0545a01·病藥喻 0545b03·收 0545b19–b21)· 品末句 0545b21 · 功德品地題/品題 0545b22–b23。
- 異譯:曇無讖 T1581〔止觀 0930a05–a07 · 巧方便十二 0930a16–a17 · 六種名 0932c17–c19 · 陀羅尼四 0934a03 · 呪詞 0934a17 · 五願 0934b10–b11 · 十大願 0934b16–b22 · 空三昧 0934b24 · 四憂檀那 0934c10–c12〕。
- 攝決擇分:0712c07 循身觀真如身 · 0712c10 真如境繫心 · 0712c15–c23 道品次第(根下品力上品 0712c20)· 0712c24 十四相麁重縛 · 0713a03 依空修念住 · 0713a12 十一後後想縛 · 0713a29–b01 收句 · 0698c06–c14 三名寬狹(0698c09 正智通三種)。
- 遁倫 T1828:本子當〔0555c07–0560a08〕。
- 窺基 T1829:本子當〔0153c29–0156c25〕。
- 最勝子 T1580:無品釋(據實標,見目一)。
- 校勘:本子段大正校記 26 條全枚舉(目二(三)·底本從 CBETA 承字讀·無升定本案;止四行「無有相/想」四本異讀·十大願「第二正願/大願」元明異讀 皆並錄);大正梵擬註三條不採。
This sub-part takes up Gates 10–15 (tranquillity-and-insight · skill in means · the four dhāraṇīs · the right vow · the three samādhis · the four dharma-uddānas) — a gathering-together of the gateways of practice along the single line of the ineffable intrinsic nature: the fourth practice of tranquillity, "the ineffable bare thing"; the reconciling of the emptiness scriptures' hidden intent of the Tathāgata; the acceptance-dhāraṇī's "without meaning is the perfectly-accomplished real"; the samādhi of emptiness's "there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena"; and the no-self of phenomena's "within all that is spoken and expressed, the phenomena that are the intrinsic nature of all speech are altogether nothing at all."
I. Doctrinal-Outline Placement
| Outline system | Placement of this sub-part |
|---|---|
| Xuanzang T1579, the Basic Section | The Chapter on the Factors of Awakening, the seventeenth, second part (latter half) + third part, Gates 10–15 〔0539c24–0545b21〕 (fasc. 45–46; the third-part fascicle title 0544a06–a07 falls just before Gate 15; the Chapter on Qualities, the eighteenth, chapter title follows at 0545b23) |
| The treatise's own text | Gate 10 tranquillity-and-insight 〔0539c24 「此中菩薩即於諸法無所分別,當知名止」 tr. "herein the bodhisattva, right within all phenomena, discerns nothing at all — this should be known as tranquillity" · outline-item boundary at the close of 0539c23〕 (the four practices of tranquillity 〔0539c26–0540a02〕: that which goes before the knowledge / the fruit of the knowledge / turning without effort throughout the conceptions of idle proliferation / the ineffable bare thing … tending toward the equal nature and single-flavored real nature of all phenomena 〔0539c29–0540a02〕 · the four practices of insight: keeping far from the extreme of over-affirmation / keeping far from the extreme of under-denial 〔0540a05〕) → Gate 11 skill in means 〔0540a10〕 (six inward, six outward 〔0540a11〕 · a slight root of goodness draws down an immeasurable fruit: a single ball of meal 〔0540b03〕, the force of the turning-over 〔0540b05〕 · slight effort draws in vast roots of goodness: the eightfold holy fast 〔0540b10〕, the Middle Way apart from the two extremes 〔0540b14〕, hurling-oneself-off-cliffs-and-rushing-into-fire 〔0540b15〕, the Vaidika spell 〔0540b18〕, a single instant of pure faith toward the emptiness dharma 〔0540b21〕 · the six kinds: according-and-reconciling 〔0540c27〕, jointly setting up a covenant 〔0541b24〕, a resolve of a differing part 〔0541c26〕, arising from pressure 〔0542a21〕, bestowing-and-requiting kindness 〔0542b03〕, ultimate purity 〔0542b13〕; the reconciling-the-hidden-intent passage: not understanding the hidden intent, the heart gives rise to fright and dread 〔0541a13–a17〕 · 「此經不說一切諸法都無所有,但說諸法所言自性都無所有」 tr. "this scripture does not say that all phenomena whatsoever are altogether nothing at all, but says that the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken of phenomena is altogether nothing at all" 〔0541a21〕 · the open-space simile 〔0541a28–0541b10〕 · the illusion-and-dream simile 〔0541b13–b17〕 · grasping-nothing-and-forsaking-nothing 〔0541b19–b21〕) → Gate 12 the wondrous dhāraṇīs 〔0542c16〕 (dharma 〔0542c19〕, meaning 〔0542c23〕, spell 〔0542c26〕, attaining the bodhisattva's acceptance 〔0543a01〕; the spell-words 0543a07–a08 · without meaning is the perfectly-accomplished real 〔0543a11〕 · there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, and this is the meaning of intrinsic nature 〔0543a17〕 · the surpassing acceptance of the Ground of Practice-through-Resolute-Conviction 〔0543a23〕 · the four qualities 〔0543b02〕) → Gate 13 the right vow 〔0543b08〕 (the five vows · the ten great vows 〔0543b17 onward〕) → Gate 14 the three samādhis 〔0543c07〕 (emptiness: the ineffable intrinsic nature, the mind rightly settled · wishlessness 〔0543c09〕 · no-character 〔0543c15〕 · the sole-establishment question-and-answer: phenomena are of two kinds, existent and non-existent 〔0543c17–c24〕) → Gate 15 the four dharma-uddānas 〔0544a08〕 (impermanence: the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken ever nothing 〔0544a19〕, the ineffable thing arising and ceasing 〔0544a21〕, the contemplation of the three times 〔0544a23 onward〕, the four characters of the instant 〔0544b04 onward〕, breaking the arising of arising 〔0544b27〕, breaking the character of ceasing 〔0544c03〕 · suffering: the three sufferings 〔0544c13〕 · the twofold no-self 〔0544c16–c23〕 · nirvāṇa-quiescence: the simile of the prince and the four carts 〔0545a01〕, the simile of the sick one and the good medicine 〔0545b03〕, the wondrously adorned cart 〔0545b19〕) |
| Dunlun, Notes on the Yogācārabhūmi T1828 | This sub-part corresponds to 〔0555c07–0560a08〕 (Gate 15 is in the latter part of fascicle 11 · the root treatise's fascicle 46 〔0558a06 onward〕); the four practices of tranquillity-and-insight, the three masters Jing / Tai / Kuiji 〔0555c10–0556a25〕; the dhāraṇīs, Jing / Kuiji / the Tripiṭaka-master / Bei 〔0556c27–0557b06〕; the four readings of the essence of the vow 〔0557b08–b12〕; Jing's judgment of the three samādhis as "uncommon to the Great Vehicle" 〔0557c02〕; the translation of the name uddāna 〔0558a10〕; the two Western glosses of the three times 〔0558b11–b26〕; the four characters 〔0558b26–0559a03〕; Kuiji's matching of the four nirvāṇas to the prince simile 〔0559c12〕 |
| Kuiji, Concise Compendium T1829 | This sub-part corresponds to 〔0153c29–0156c25〕 (0155b29 the fascicle-boundary signature "fascicle 46, the Factors-of-Awakening Dharmas, the seventeenth, third part"); the four practices of tranquillity, judged by grades 〔0154a20–a22〕; the reconciling matched to the threefold nature 〔0154b23–c21〕; the dhāraṇī-essence stated 〔0154c22–0155a03〕; the three samādhis, the aspects matched-and-assigned 〔0155b05–b19〕; the four characters, the great topic 〔0155c12–0156a28〕; breaking arising-and-ceasing 〔0156a29–c08〕; nirvāṇa, the threefold matching 〔0156c13–c17〕 |
| Jinaputra T1580 | No chapter-level exposition (the fifteen occurrences of "samādhi" are all at the level of the stage-name of the seventeen stages · the three occurrences of "uddāna" are all the naming of the summary-verse of the seventeen stages · zero occurrences of "dhāraṇī") |
II. Alternate Translations · Collation of In-Treatise Parallels
(i) The Two Other Chinese Translations (Xuanzang · Dharmakṣema · Guṇavarman)
| Point of meaning | Xuanzang T1579 | Dharmakṣema T1581, the Chapter on Awakening, the seventeenth | Guṇavarman T1582 (Chapters 18 + 19) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gate 10 · the definition of tranquillity-and-insight | 「即於諸法無所分別,當知名止。若於諸法勝義理趣如實真智,及於無量安立理趣世俗妙智,當知名觀」 tr. "right within all phenomena, discerning nothing at all, should be known as tranquillity. If, with respect to all phenomena, there is the true knowledge in accord with the real that ranges over the ultimate mode of principle, and the wondrous conventional knowledge that ranges over the immeasurable mode of principle established by convention, this should be known as insight" 〔0539c24 onward〕 | 「若彼菩薩於此法如是不起妄想者,是名為止。及彼如實知第一義,及無量處方便知法,是名為觀」 tr. "if that bodhisattva, toward this dharma, thus does not raise a false conceiving, this is named tranquillity. And his knowing in accord with the real the highest meaning, and his knowing the dharma by means in immeasurable places, is named insight" 〔0930a05–a07〕 (setting up no separate question-head, appended at the end of the thirty-seven path-factors passage) | 「菩薩若知不以覺觀觀三十七品,是名舍摩他。菩薩若知法界真實不可宣說,是名毘婆舍那」 tr. "if the bodhisattva knows so as not to contemplate the thirty-seven [awakening-]classes by applied-and-sustained thought, this is named śamatha. If the bodhisattva knows that the dharma-realm is in truth not to be proclaimed, this is named vipaśyanā" 〔0994c28–0995a02〕 (rendering tranquillity-and-insight by transliteration) |
| Gate 11 · the twelve kinds | 依內六依外六 tr. six inward, six outward 〔0540a11〕 | 「云何菩薩巧方便?略說十二種,為起內佛法有六種、為外成熟眾生有六種」 tr. "what is the bodhisattva's skillful means? Stated in brief, there are twelve kinds: for raising the inner buddha-dharmas there are six kinds, for ripening sentient beings outwardly there are six kinds" 〔0930a16–a17〕 | 「善方便者有十二種,內六種、外六種」 tr. "of the good means there are twelve kinds, six inward and six outward" 〔0995a09–a11〕 |
| Gate 11 · the six names | 隨順會通/共立要契/異分意樂/逼迫所生/施恩報恩/究竟清淨 tr. according-and-reconciling / jointly setting up a covenant / a resolve of a differing part / arising from pressure / bestowing-and-requiting kindness / ultimate purity 〔0540c27 onward〕 | 「一者隨順;二者立要;三者異相;四者逼迫;五者報恩;六者清淨」 tr. "first, according; second, setting up a covenant; third, a differing character; fourth, pressure; fifth, requiting kindness; sixth, purity" 〔0932c17–c19〕 (this passage falls in "the remainder of the Chapter on the Factors of Awakening" — Gate 11 is cut across the middle by the four-means re-emerging passage 〔0930c02–0932c09〕, detailed in sub-part one, Heading II) | 「一者隨他;二者無障;三者不動;四者心相似;五者報恩;六者清淨」 tr. "first, according with another; second, without obstruction; third, unmoving; fourth, mind-resembling; fifth, requiting kindness; sixth, purity" 〔0995b16〕; and "without obstruction" and "unmoving" are stated together, gathered into a single line 「是名無障不動」 tr. "this is named without-obstruction-and-unmoving" 〔0996a12〕, not aligning with Xuanzang's opening-and-closing of the three gates covenant / differing-part / pressure |
| Gate 12 · the four dhāraṇīs | 法/義/呪/能得菩薩忍 tr. dharma / meaning / spell / attaining the bodhisattva's acceptance 〔0542c16 onward〕 | 「一者法陀羅尼;二者義陀羅尼;三者呪術陀羅尼;四者得菩薩忍陀羅尼」 tr. "first, the dharma-dhāraṇī; second, the meaning-dhāraṇī; third, the spell-craft-dhāraṇī; fourth, the attaining-the-bodhisattva's-acceptance-dhāraṇī" 〔0934a03〕 | 「一者法陀羅尼;二者義陀羅尼;三者辭陀羅尼;四者忍陀羅尼」 tr. "first, the dharma-dhāraṇī; second, the meaning-dhāraṇī; third, the eloquence-dhāraṇī; fourth, the acceptance-dhāraṇī" 〔0996b23〕 — the third named "eloquence," but its content is in truth the divine spell: 「受持神呪讀誦通利利益眾生」 tr. "upholding the divine spell, reciting and reading it fluently, benefiting sentient beings" 〔0996c01〕; and it adds the five practices of spell-upholding: 「一者不食肉;二者不飲酒;三者不食五辛;四者不婬;五者不淨之家不在中食」 tr. "first, not eating meat; second, not drinking wine; third, not eating the five pungent herbs; fourth, no sexual conduct; fifth, not eating within an impure house" 〔0996c02–c04〕 (absent from the Bodhisattvabhūmi and from Xuanzang) |
| The acceptance-dhāraṇī spell-words | 壹胝蜜胝吉胝毘羼底鉢陀膩莎訶 〔0543a07–a08〕 | 「伊致 密致 吉胝鼻 羼提跛大㗩波呵」 〔0934a17〕 | 「乙致 蜜致 䩭致毘 羼提 般檀那 莎呵」 〔0996c10–c11〕 |
| Gate 13 · the vow | 發心/受生/所行/正/大願 five kinds + the ten great vows tr. arousing-the-mind / taking-birth / what-is-to-be-practiced / the right vow / the great vow 〔0543b08 onward〕 | 「一者發心願;二者生願;三者境界願;四者平等願;五者大願」 tr. "first, the vow of arousing the mind; second, the vow of birth; third, the vow of the object-sphere; fourth, the vow of equality; fifth, the great vow" 〔0934b10–b11〕; 「又說十種大願」 tr. "and it speaks of ten kinds of great vow" 〔0934b16〕, the ten in full, 「十者願成無上正覺」 tr. "tenth, the vow to accomplish unsurpassed perfect awakening" 〔0934b22〕 | 「一者發心發願;二者有發願;三者行發願;四者善發願;五者大發願」 tr. "first, arousing-the-mind vowing; second, the existent vowing; third, the practice vowing; fourth, the good vowing; fifth, the great vowing" 〔0996c25–c26〕; the great vow has no set of ten — "the great vowing" only strings out about six matters in a row 〔0997a01–a09〕 |
| Gate 14 · the samādhi of emptiness | 「觀一切事,遠離一切言說自性,唯有諸法離言自性,心正安住」 tr. "contemplating all things, keeping far from all intrinsic nature as spoken, there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, the mind rightly settled" 〔0543c07〕 | 「菩薩離一切言說自性,觀無言說自性心住,是名空三昧」 tr. "the bodhisattva keeps apart from all the intrinsic nature as spoken, contemplates the intrinsic nature that is without speech, the mind abiding — this is named the samādhi of emptiness" 〔0934b24〕 | 「菩薩深觀一切諸法有可說性,是可說性不可說性中無,故名空三昧」 tr. "the bodhisattva deeply contemplates that all phenomena have a speakable nature, and this speakable nature is absent within the unspeakable nature, and so it is named the samādhi of emptiness" 〔0997a10–a11〕 |
| Gate 15 · the four dharma-uddānas | 無常/苦/無我/涅槃寂靜 tr. impermanence / suffering / no-self / nirvāṇa-quiescence 〔0544a08 onward〕 | 「四憂檀那法」 tr. "the four udāna dharmas": 「一切行無常是憂檀那法……涅槃寂滅是憂檀那法」 tr. "all activities are impermanent, this is an udāna dharma … nirvāṇa is quiescent-cessation, this is an udāna dharma" 〔0934c10–c12〕 | 「四法」 tr. "the four dharmas" = 「一切有為法無常、苦、無我、涅槃寂靜」 tr. "all conditioned dharmas are impermanent, suffering, without a self; nirvāṇa is quiescent" 〔0997b01〕, named 「優陀那」 tr. "udāna"; the name glossed 「能作上者名優陀那,增長善法名優陀那」 tr. "what is able to make [one] go up is named udāna; what increases the good dharmas is named udāna" 〔0997b04〕 |
| The nirvāṇa-passage similes | 王子四車喻 tr. the simile of the prince and the four carts 〔0545a01〕 · 病者良藥喻 tr. the simile of the sick one and the good medicine 〔0545b03〕 | (abridged) | Expanded: the simile of "not the born of elephants and horses, [yet] raising an elephant-and-horse notion" + the simile of the sick one trusting only after taking the medicine, and it says 「如來實常」 tr. "the Tathāgata is in truth constant" 〔0998a10 onward〕, far exceeding the two [others] in length |
The two other [translations] are only recorded, not adjudicated. The spell-words of the three [translations] transliterate mutually differently (each following the sound of its own time); Xuanzang's spell-words are in the Taishō base text set as a dhāraṇī-division passage-format and carry the phonetic gloss 「丁里反」 tr. "spelled dīng-lǐ" (see Heading II (iii) note 0543002).
(ii) The In-Treatise Parallel = the Substance-Passage of the Section on Ascertainment's Chapter Ascertaining the Factors of Awakening
The ascertainment of the substance of Chapter 17 = 0712c07–0713b01 (before it, 0710c29–0712c06 is the three-clusters of the precepts-chapter · a re-ascertainment of giving and the other six perfections, each returning to its own chapter). Four passages:
- The contemplation of the body along the suchness-body 〔0712c07〕: 「云何菩薩於身住循身觀?謂於相身循環觀真如身。如於身,於受、心、法,隨其所應,當知亦爾。」 tr. "how does the bodhisattva, in the body, abide in the contemplation of the body along the body? Namely, along the character-body he circulates and contemplates the suchness-body. As with the body, so with feelings, mind, and dharmas, each as befits it, it should be known likewise." The ascertainment of the right exertions 〔0712c10〕: 「謂於真如境繫心令住,為令一切相及麁重未得現前……」 tr. "namely, toward the object of suchness he ties his mind and makes it abide, so that all character and coarse-and-heavy that have not yet been gained do not come present …" — the "evil and unwholesome dharmas" of the four right exertions are ascertained as the two bonds, the character-bond and the coarse-and-heavy-bond (the same terminology-system as the Saṃdhinirmocana's 「眾生為相縛,及為麁重縛」 tr. "sentient beings are by the character-bond and by the coarse-and-heavy-bond" 〔cited in the root treatise fasc. 75, 0716b16〕).
- The one continuous sequence of the path-factors 〔0712c15–c23〕: the foundations of mindfulness (tying the mind, placing it on the object) → the right exertions (making the mind abide in ease) → the bases of supernormal power (the fullness of absorption) → the faculties and powers (「加行道中,根是下品,力是上品」 tr. "in the applied-effort path, the faculties are the lower grade, the powers are the higher grade" 〔0712c20〕) → the awakening-factors (penetrating the real limit) → the path-factors → realizing awakening.
- The fourteen kinds of character-and-coarse-and-heavy bond 〔0712c24〕: 「相麁重縛,當知差別有十四種。一、根縛。二、境縛。三、有情展轉更相愛縛。四、建立縛,謂器世間……十四、法遍知增上慢縛。」 tr. "of the character-and-coarse-and-heavy bond, it should be known that there are fourteen kinds of distinction. First, the faculty-bond. Second, the object-bond. Third, the bond by which sentient beings, turning about, love one another in turn. Fourth, the establishment-bond, namely the receptacle-world … Fourteenth, the bond of conceit-of-superiority in the thorough knowing of dharmas."
- The six kinds of false-conception bond · the eleven successive conception-bonds 〔0713a03–b01〕: 「依空勤修念住菩薩,略於六種妄想縛中,當令其心速得解脫」 tr. "the bodhisattva who, in dependence on emptiness, diligently cultivates the foundations of mindfulness should, within the six kinds of false-conception bond, make his mind swiftly attain liberation"; 「復有十一後後想縛」 tr. "there are, further, eleven successive conception-bonds" 〔0713a12〕; the gathering-line 「於此想縛得解脫故,一切想縛皆得解脫」 tr. "because he attains liberation from this conception-bond, from all conception-bonds he attains liberation" 〔0713a29–b01〕 — at the last of the eleven successive conception-bonds, even 「無自性相想」 tr. "the conception of a characterless-of-intrinsic-nature" is a bond (Dunlun's gloss 〔T42n1828 0770b04〕: 「唯知諸法無決定性,亦由情帶取執說名為縛」 tr. "merely knowing that dharmas have no settled nature — this too, because the affect carries a grasping, is named a bond").
Two ancient-master judgments of the chapter-boundary (stable citation · recorded together): Dunlun 〔T42n1828 0770b07–b10〕: 「若依景師釋,此下乃至八殊勝來猶是決擇是菩提分法品,其深密經文全是決擇功德品。雖有此判,今還依前判。玄師親承三藏有此傳也」 tr. "if by Jing's gloss, from here down as far as the eight excellences it is still the ascertainment of the Chapter on the Factors of Awakening, and the Saṃdhinirmocana scripture-text is wholly the ascertainment of the Chapter on Qualities. Although there is this judgment, we now follow the former judgment. Master Xuan, having in person received it from the Tripiṭaka-master, had this transmission" — from 0713b01 down (from "the breaking of the wrongly-grasped emptiness" to "the eight excellences") Jing judges to still belong to the ascertainment of the Chapter on the Factors of Awakening; Dunlun follows the former judgment (that from 0713b01 on it is the ascertainment of the Chapter on Qualities), and records that this judgment carries the Tripiṭaka-master's transmission. Both judgments are recorded together; this apparatus, following the CBETA outline, takes 0713b01 as the boundary.
A further passage in the Section on Ascertainment available for comparison (all not a dedicated chapter for Chapter 17): the five-events section of the Chapter Ascertaining the True Reality 〔0698c06–c14 · 「正智通三種,是空所行境」 tr. "right knowledge runs through the three [samādhis]; it is the sphere ranged over by emptiness" 0698c09〕: 「若無差別,總說為空、無願、無相……若唯以三摩地名而宣說者,當知此中,唯修所成為性……若唯以解脫門名而宣說者,當知此中,唯出世間修所成為性」 tr. "if without distinction, they are stated together as emptiness, wishlessness, and no-character … if proclaimed only under the name 'samādhi,' it should be known that herein it is only cultivation-attained by nature … if proclaimed only under the name 'gate of liberation,' it should be known that herein it is only the world-transcending cultivation-attained by nature" — the ascertainment of the broad-and-narrow of the three names, emptiness / samādhi / gate-of-liberation, a comparison-anchor for Gate 14.
(iii) Collation (full enumeration of the Taishō base text's collation notes · this sub-part's span 0539c24–0545b21)
This sub-part's span carries in all 26 collation notes in the Taishō base text (2 fascicle/chapter titles + 1 vow-text colophon + 23 in the body). The base text follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); not a single note in this sub-part rises to a critical-edition emendation; variants are recorded alongside for the record:
| Note # | Anchor | Base 【大 Taishō】 | Variant | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0539009 | 0539c29 | 相 | 想【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The fourth practice of tranquillity, "by having no character and discerning nothing at all" (the four editions read "no conception" · a variant reading at a doctrinal eye-line · recorded alongside) |
| 0540003 | 0540b03 | 一 | 二【元】【明】 | The very lowest, a single ball of meal (the character 「麨」 is a missing glyph in the base print, CB00595, normalized in the base text) |
| 0540004 | 0540b09 | 齋 | 齊【聖】* | The wrong fasting-abstinence |
| 0540006 | 0540c19 | 情 | 性【聖】 | Sentient beings |
| 0540007 | 0540c27 | 於 | 隨於【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The opening of according-and-reconciling |
| 0541001 | 0541b13 | 如 | 知【宋】【元】【明】【聖】 | The illusion-and-dream simile passage |
| 0541002 | 0541c02 | 域 | 役【宋】,城【元】【明】【宮】 | Jointly setting up a covenant · matters of the king, matters of walled cities |
| 0541003 | 0541c20 | 令 | 爾【宋】【元】【明】 | The covenant passage |
| 0542001 | 0542a22 | 主 | 正【元】 | Whether being a householder-master |
| 0542002 | 0542a24 | 正 | 止【元】 | Able rightly to instruct and admonish |
| 0542003 | 0542b04 | 多少 | 少多【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | According to their strength, in greater or lesser measure |
| 0542004 | 0542b05 | 厄 | 危【聖】 | Relieving peril |
| 0542005 | 0542c01 | 今 | 令【三】【宮】【聖】 | The ultimate-purity passage |
| 0543001 | 0543a07 | — | 胝毘間宋元明宮聖五本連續而毘下間空 | The spell-words' continuous-writing format (the five editions write 「吉胝毘」 continuously) |
| 0543002 | 0543a07 | 里 | 理【三】【宮】【聖】 | The 「里」 of the spell-words' phonetic gloss 「丁里反」 |
| 0543003 | 0543b04 | 姤 | 妬【三】【宮】【聖】 | Raising no jealous grudge |
| 0543004 | 0543b22 | 正 | 大【元】【明】 | "It should be known that this is called the second right vow" (the second of the ten great vows; Yuan and Ming read "the second great vow," uniform with the nine vows before and after — the base text follows the CBETA character-reading, keeping "the right vow" 〔the Taishō original print is the same〕, the variant recorded alongside) |
| 0543005 | 0543b24 | 願於 | 於願【聖】 | The third great vow |
| 0543006 | 0543c26 | 三 | 〔三〕-【聖】 | The closing passage of the three samādhis |
| 0543007 | 0543c28 | — | 此下聖本有光明皇后願文 | The end of fascicle 45 (a transmitted-edition colophon: below this the Sheng edition has the vow-text of Empress Kōmyō) |
| 0544001 | 0544a06 | 第十五 | 〔第十五〕-【明】* | The third-part fascicle title |
| 0544002 | 0544a08 | 拕 | 柁【三】【宮】 | The dharma-uddāna |
| 0544003 | 0544a27 | 猶 | 由【三】【宮】 | The impermanence three-times-contemplation passage |
| 0544004 | 0544c02 | 老 | 若【明】 | The four-characters passage |
| 0544005 | 0544c26 | 體 | 能【元】 | Nirvāṇa is in its substance quiescent |
| 0545001 | 0545b06 | 爾 | 今【聖】 | The sick-one simile passage |
Further, the Taishō editor appends conjectural Sanskrit notes (0540001 tranquillity-and-insight · 0540002 skill in means · 0540005 the Vaidika spell) — modern-editor conjectural supplements, not transmitted by the ancient masters, not adopted, not entered into the terminology heading.
III. Scriptural Grounds for the Consciousness-Only Meaning (the Point of the Eye · of weight)
This sub-part = a gathering-together of the gateways of practice along the single line of the ineffable intrinsic nature, dense with the plain text of the ancient masters:
- The fourth practice of tranquillity · the ineffable bare thing 〔0539c29–0540a02〕: 「即於如是離言唯事,由無有相無所分別,其心寂靜,趣向一切法平等性、一味實性」 tr. "right within such an ineffable bare thing, by having no character and discerning nothing at all, stilled in mind, tending toward the equal nature, the single-flavored real nature of all phenomena" 〔0539c29–0540a02〕 — Tai: 「於離言唯事依他性其心寂靜是真智也」 tr. "in the ineffable bare thing that is the other-dependent nature, stilled in mind — this is the true knowledge" 〔T42n1828 0556a01〕; Kuiji: 「說正智觀依他,不分別有性,故入一味真如義」 tr. "it says that the right knowledge contemplates the other-dependent, and does not discern that it has any nature, and so enters the meaning of the single-flavored suchness" 〔T43n1829 0154a16–a17〕; Kuiji's judgment of the four practices by grades: 「第一、在地前加行道中;第二、入地已去乃至七地以前;第三、在八地以上乃至九地;第四、十地為之,入於佛地」 tr. "the first, in the applied-effort path before the grounds; the second, from entering the grounds up to before the seventh ground; the third, above the eighth ground up to the ninth; the fourth is done by the tenth ground, entering the buddha-ground" 〔0154a20–a22〕.
- ★ Reconciling the emptiness scriptures · the hidden intent of the Tathāgata 〔0541a21〕: 「此經不說一切諸法都無所有,但說諸法所言自性都無所有」 tr. "this scripture does not say that all phenomena whatsoever are altogether nothing at all, but says that the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken of phenomena is altogether nothing at all" — Kuiji's threefold-nature matching: 「不說依他等二性都無性,說遍計所言自性是無也」 tr. "it does not say that the two natures, the other-dependent and the rest, are altogether without nature; it says that the wholly-imagined intrinsic-nature-as-spoken is what is absent" 〔T43n1829 0154b25〕; 「如此言說所說自性如兔角故……言無事,即無遍計事也,非無依他」 tr. "since the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken that is expressed in such speech is like a rabbit's horn … saying 'without any thing' means without the wholly-imagined thing, and not without the other-dependent" 〔0154c01〕; 「此喻真如如空,遍計如色等」 tr. "this figures suchness as being like open space, and the wholly-imagined as being like forms and the rest" 〔0154c05〕; 「喻依他如幻等」 tr. "it figures the other-dependent as being like an illusion and the rest" 〔0154c09〕; each of the three natures being neither existent nor non-existent, 「非無,勝義有也」 tr. "it is not non-existent — it is present in the ultimate sense" 〔0154c19〕; 「不取遍計,不捨二性……名無失壞」 tr. "he does not grasp the wholly-imagined, and does not forsake the two natures … this is named not letting it go to ruin" 〔0154c20〕. (Dunlun records the same text 〔T42n1828 0556b18–c14〕.)
- ★ The acceptance-dhāraṇī · without meaning is the perfectly-accomplished real 〔0543a11 · 0543a17〕: 「都無有義,是圓成實,但唯無義」「一切言說所說諸法自性之義皆不成實,唯有諸法離言自性是自性義」 tr. "altogether without meaning, it is the perfectly-accomplished real, and is only meaning-less"; "the meaning of the intrinsic nature of all phenomena that is spoken and expressed in all speech is one and all not accomplished as real; there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, and this is the meaning of intrinsic nature" — the Tripiṭaka-master says (recorded by Dunlun): 「此以無分別智為體。若爾,何故言能得忍?此於加行道中,持思此呪故速得真智證於真如,故下文在勝解行地」 tr. "this takes non-conceptual knowledge as its essence. If so, why is it said to be 'attaining acceptance'? In the applied-effort path, by upholding-and-reflecting on this spell one swiftly gains the true knowledge and realizes suchness, and so the text below places it at the Ground of Practice-through-Resolute-Conviction" 〔T42n1828 0557a08–a10〕 (the Concise Compendium records it as "the Master says" 〔T43n1829 0155a01–a03〕, the two transmissions cross-confirming = Xuanzang's meaning); Bei says: 「呪句正詮依他圓成離言無生故,菩薩諦思自然得解無生法忍。論云:無義意在於此」 tr. "the spell-phrases rightly convey that the other-dependent and the perfectly-accomplished are ineffable and unarisen, and so the bodhisattva, reflecting truly, naturally comes to understand the acceptance of the unarisen dharmas. The treatise saying 'without meaning' intends just this" 〔T42n1828 0557b04–b06〕; Kuiji: 「此釋上無義是圓成實義……但由此呪下無所詮故……而證圓成實」 tr. "this glosses the above 'without meaning is the perfectly-accomplished real' meaning … it is only because this spell below expresses nothing … that he realizes the perfectly-accomplished real" 〔T43n1829 0155a21 onward〕.
- ★ The three samādhis · uncommon to the Great Vehicle: the samādhi of emptiness 「觀一切事,遠離一切言說自性,唯有諸法離言自性,心正安住」 tr. "contemplating all things, keeping far from all intrinsic nature as spoken, there is only the ineffable intrinsic nature of phenomena, the mind rightly settled" 〔0543c07〕 — Jing says: 「此明大乘不共三三摩地,以無分別智相應定數一體義說。下約十六行辨三三摩地與二乘共」 tr. "this shows the Great Vehicle's uncommon three samādhis, spoken in the sense that the non-conceptual knowledge and the associated absorption are of one substance. Below, in terms of the sixteen aspects, it distinguishes the three samādhis that are held in common with the two vehicles" 〔T42n1828 0557c02–c04〕; Kuiji's own judgment: 「此論文意,在真觀中義用分立此三解脫門,若斷惑,唯空行」 tr. "the intent of this treatise's text is that, within the true contemplation, these three gates of liberation are distinguished by function-in-meaning; if for cutting off delusion, only the emptiness-aspect" 〔T43n1829 0155b15〕; the Section-on-Ascertainment comparison: the broad-and-narrow of the three names, emptiness / samādhi / gate-of-liberation 〔0698c06–c14〕.
- ★ The consciousness-only reading of the three times (the Western transmission): Woncheuk says (recorded by Dunlun) 〔T42n1828 0558b14–b26〕: 「於此文中西方兩釋。一云,法相道理於一現在法建立三世……二云:唯識道理建立三世,謂於現在見分體上有三世相而得顯現,故說三世,據實是現在攝」 tr. "within this text there are two Western glosses. One says, by the reasoning of the dharma-characters the three times are established upon a single present dharma … a second says: by the reasoning of consciousness-only the three times are established — namely, upon the substance of the seeing-part in the present there appear the characters of the three times, and so the three times are spoken of, though in truth they are subsumed under the present"; and 「三藏兩解」 tr. "the Tripiṭaka-master's two glosses" 〔0558b22〕, the two glosses of "the past and the future being absent, yet named impermanent."
- The no-self of phenomena 〔0544c21–c22〕: 「於一切言說事中,一切言說自性諸法都無所有」 tr. "within all that is spoken and expressed, the phenomena that are the intrinsic nature of all speech are altogether nothing at all"; the Section on Ascertainment · cultivating the foundations of mindfulness in dependence on emptiness 〔0713a03〕: 「依空勤修念住菩薩,略於六種妄想縛中,當令其心速得解脫」 tr. "the bodhisattva who, in dependence on emptiness, diligently cultivates the foundations of mindfulness should, within the six kinds of false-conception bond, make his mind swiftly attain liberation" — emptiness (the ineffable) runs through the foundations of mindfulness.
- Master Kuiji · matching the four nirvāṇas to the prince simile (recorded by Dunlun) 〔T42n1828 0559c12–c14〕: 「喻四涅槃,象喻無住涅槃……謂鹿始終常居山靜,喻本來淨。牛有角故,喻有餘依。馬無角故,喻無餘依。」 tr. "it figures the four nirvāṇas: the elephant figures the non-abiding nirvāṇa … namely, the deer, from first to last ever dwelling in the mountain-stillness, figures the originally-pure; the ox, having horns, figures [the nirvāṇa] with remaining basis; the horse, being hornless, figures [the nirvāṇa] without remaining basis."
IV. The Explanations of the Various Masters (the Ancients · Setting the Theme)
The ancient masters within the canon touching this sub-part: Dunlun (Jing / Tai / Kuiji / Woncheuk + the Tripiṭaka-master, three instances + Master Bei, two instances + Dunlun's own judgment, two instances; the Yuan master [Faxian] does not appear in this chapter) · Kuiji (in the modes "there is a text / there is a meaning / the Master says / the detailed statement says") · Jinaputra (no chapter-level exposition). The several explanations are only recorded, not adjudicated.
(i) The Four Practices of Tranquillity-and-Insight — Jing / Tai / Kuiji, the Three Masters, Line by Line (recorded by Dunlun; Kuiji's own work agrees)
Dunlun's general statement 〔T42n1828 0555c07–c10〕: 「言無所分別,當知名止者,靜慮一緣離諸分別當知名止,次明真俗二智名觀。」 tr. "as for 'discerning nothing at all, should be known as tranquillity': meditative absorption on a single object, apart from the several discernments, should be known as tranquillity; next, showing the two knowledges, true and conventional, is named insight." The four practices of tranquillity 〔0555c10–0556a08〕: of the first practice, Jing says, 「先起於定依定修智名智前行,亦可先起於智依智修定」 tr. "first raising the absorption, and in dependence on the absorption cultivating the knowledge, is named 'going before the knowledge'; it is also possible first to raise the knowledge, and in dependence on the knowledge cultivate the absorption" / Kuiji says, 「即無分別智、後得智之前方便定,即與加行智同時定」 tr. "that is, the expedient absorption before the non-conceptual knowledge and the subsequently-attained knowledge, namely the absorption simultaneous with the applied-effort knowledge" 〔T43n1829 0154a01〕; of the third practice, Jing says, 「明離惡也」 tr. "it clarifies keeping-apart-from-evil" / Tai says, 「是俗諦智也」 tr. "this is the conventional-truth knowledge" / Kuiji says, 「轉即轉滅,謂正智普於一切戲論想中皆能轉滅」 tr. "'turns' means turns-and-extinguishes — namely, the right knowledge, throughout all conceptions of idle proliferation, is everywhere able to turn-and-extinguish [them]"; of the fourth practice, Jing says, 「明無分別定正證真如」 tr. "it clarifies that the non-conceptual absorption rightly realizes suchness" / Tai says, 「則於如是俗諦中推求言說分別性不可得,於離言唯事依他性其心寂靜是真智也」 tr. "then, within such a conventional truth, seeking out the intrinsic nature of speech-and-discernment, it is not to be found; in the ineffable bare thing that is the other-dependent nature, stilled in mind — this is the true knowledge" 〔0556a01〕 / Kuiji says (the single-flavored suchness, see Heading III) + the four-fold judgment by grades 〔T43n1829 0154a20–a22〕. The four practices of insight 〔T42n1828 0556a09–a25〕: Jing says line by line (the second line, knowing the wholly-imagined is without character · the third line, knowing thoroughly that the truly-accomplished is present · the fourth line, the contemplation of the distinctions of the other-dependent) / Tai says, 「四止道前方便思量觀察故名四觀也,從四觀後任運而轉不作意思量即名四止」 tr. "the four are the expedient thinking-and-contemplating before the path of tranquillity, and so are named the four insights; from after the four insights, turning spontaneously, not applying deliberate thought, is named the four tranquillities" / Kuiji says, 「此四智地地皆有,別配稍難」 tr. "these four knowledges are present in every ground, and to assign them separately is somewhat hard" 〔T43n1829 0154a29〕.
(ii) The Reconciling of the Hidden Intent, Matched to the Threefold Nature — Kuiji (Dunlun records the same text)
〔T43n1829 0154b23–c21; T42n1828 0556b18–c14〕, see Heading III ★. Further, the dividing-line of according-and-reconciling 〔T43n1829 0154b09–b18〕: 「明隨順;以下明會通。隨順,順彼;會通,為釋經說」 tr. "it clarifies according; below, it clarifies reconciling. 'According' means according with that [being]; 'reconciling' means glossing what the scripture says"; as for 「現神通、記心、顯說」 tr. "displaying supernormal powers, mind-reading, disclosing preaching" and the rest, 「即三輪也」 tr. "these are the three spheres" 〔0154b18〕; 「謂有三摩地,能遍緣一切,即一切種智所依定也」 tr. "namely, there is a samādhi able to take all as object universally — that is, the absorption on which the all-kinds-of-knowledge depends" 〔0154b19–b22 · Dunlun 「則一切種智定也」 tr. "then it is the all-kinds-of-knowledge absorption" 〔T42n1828 0556b17〕〕.
(iii) The One-Month Not Eating · Hurling-Oneself-off-Cliffs and Rushing-into-Fire · the Vaidika Spell — Kuiji's Gloss (Dunlun records the same)
〔T43n1829 0154b05–b08〕: the treatise's 「一月不食」 tr. "not eating for a month" is the outsiders' reckoning; 「投巖、赴火」 tr. "hurling-oneself-off-cliffs, rushing-into-fire" is the Nirgrantha's reckoning; the treatise's 「婆羅門吠陀迦呪」 tr. "the brahmin's Vaidika spell," 「此云明呪也。究竟淨,謂為無漏出世淨也」 tr. "this means the illumining spell. 'Ultimate purity' means the uncontaminated, world-transcending purity."
(iv) The Ten Things for Sustaining the Body · the Eight Characters of Ultimate [Awakening] — Dunlun (including one text-judgment · one instance of Tai)
「十資身具者,相傳云:如下田宅等以為十種,此說不然。今依意識相應地文」 tr. "as for 'the ten things for sustaining the body,' it is transmitted, saying: taking the fields, dwellings, and the rest below as the ten kinds — this saying is not so. We now follow the text of the Stage Associated with Mental Consciousness" 〔T42n1828 0556c14–c15〕; the eight characters of ultimate purity, 「文中,闕少四事,加一苦行」 tr. "in the text, it is short four matters and adds one, the austerities" 〔0556c20〕 (on the opening-and-closing of the eight characters of accomplishing-the-way, recorded as it stands); on Brahmā's requesting the dharma, Tai says: 「為壞計等一類有情故,於菩提樹下梵王初請不則為說,以佛眼觀五拘隣等有機故,後至鹿園方說法也」 tr. "in order to break the reckoning of that class of sentient beings, beneath the bodhi tree, at Brahmā's first request he does not then preach; because with the buddha-eye he sees that the five, Kauṇḍinya and the rest, have the capacity, only later, on reaching the Deer Park, does he preach the dharma" 〔0556c23 onward〕.
(v) The Essence of the Four Dhāraṇīs — Jing / Kuiji / the Tripiṭaka-master (recorded by Dunlun; Kuiji's own work's "the Master says" of the same source)
〔T42n1828 0556c27–0557a10〕: Jing says, 「法義呪三持用如量智為性,忍持通用如理如量二智為性。若約法數出體,法義二持即用念慧為性,呪持一種用自在定為性,以禪定力加被諸呪文句令有神驗。第四忍持即用智慧為性」 tr. "the three dhāraṇīs of dharma, meaning, and spell take as their nature the knowledge-of-measure; the acceptance-dhāraṇī takes commonly as its nature the two knowledges, the knowledge-of-principle and the knowledge-of-measure. If the essence is stated by the dharma-count, the two dhāraṇīs of dharma and meaning take mindfulness-and-wisdom as their nature, the one kind, the spell-dhāraṇī, takes the mastery-absorption as its nature, empowering by the force of meditative absorption the several spell-phrases so that they have potency; the fourth, the acceptance-dhāraṇī, takes wisdom as its nature"; Kuiji says, 「能得忍陀羅尼者,以無分別智為忍體,即證真如。能得忍者,即加行智」 tr. "as for the dhāraṇī for attaining acceptance, it takes non-conceptual knowledge as the essence of acceptance, namely realizing suchness. As for the attaining-acceptance, it is the applied-effort knowledge" 〔Kuiji's own work T43n1829 0154c22–0155a01〕; the Tripiṭaka-master says, 「此以無分別智為體。若爾,何故言能得忍?此於加行道中,持思此呪故速得真智證於真如,故下文在勝解行地」 tr. "this takes non-conceptual knowledge as its essence. If so, why is it said to be 'attaining acceptance'? In the applied-effort path, by upholding-and-reflecting on this spell one swiftly gains the true knowledge and realizes suchness, and so the text below places it at the Ground of Practice-through-Resolute-Conviction" 〔0557a08–a10〕 — the signature cross-confirmation: the Concise Compendium has this passage as "the Master says" 〔T43n1829 0155a01〕, the Notes signs it plainly "the Tripiṭaka-master says" = Xuanzang, the two transmissions cross-confirming.
(vi) The Cultivation-Character of the Acceptance-Dhāraṇī — Jing / Kuiji / Bei, the Three Masters (recorded by Dunlun)
〔T42n1828 0557a10–b06〕: Kuiji says, 「言成就自然堅固因行者,謂在地前。具足妙慧者,即成就趣出世妙慧也」 tr. "as for 'accomplishing the naturally-firm cause-conduct,' it means being before the grounds. 'Fully furnished with wondrous wisdom' means accomplishing the wondrous wisdom that tends toward the world-transcending" 〔0557a13 onward〕 (Kuiji's own work's catch-phrase reads 「成熟自然堅固因行」 tr. "ripening the naturally-firm cause-conduct," glossing 「是忍云因,不可動故」 tr. "acceptance is called the cause, because it cannot be moved" 〔T43n1829 0155a04–a05〕 — both transmissions recorded together); Tai says, 「空寂之處眼所遊略無物可觀,故名空無有物見路而行也」 tr. "in the empty and still place, where the eye's ranging finds almost no thing to contemplate, it is therefore named 'empty, with never a single thing, walking seeing the path'"; Jing says, 「不畜資緣見路而行,夜無他涉待曉方進」 tr. "storing up no provisions, walking seeing the path, in the night having no other doings, waiting for dawn to go on"; broadly clarifying the cultivation-character: Jing says, 「謂依於無義呪句正起思惟,類知一切,言說自性皆不可得名為通達……都無有義是圓成實」 tr. "namely, in dependence on the meaning-less spell-phrases, rightly raising reflection, knowing all by analogy — that the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken is one and all not to be found is named penetration … altogether without meaning is the perfectly-accomplished real"; Kuiji says, 「謂此呪無有義,但唯有名。謂地前菩薩誦此無義之呪,欲除計執……由此思惟故,便能入真觀,證菩薩忍」 tr. "namely, this spell has no meaning, but only a name. Namely, a bodhisattva before the grounds recites this spell of no meaning, wishing to remove the grasping-and-reckoning … and by this reflection he is then able to enter true contemplation and realize the bodhisattva's acceptance" 〔T43n1829 0155a15 onward〕; Bei says (see Heading III ★).
(vii) The Four Readings of the Essence of the Vow — the Old Masters / Bei / the Tripiṭaka-master / Jing (recorded by Dunlun, set out together)
〔T42n1828 0557b08–b12〕: 「論願體性諸師不同,有古師依成實以忍為體。備師云:以智為性。故此論云:智於後後希求故。三藏云:思欲信上假立願也。景師云:用勝解欲思信為體。」 tr. "on the essence of the vow the treatise's several masters differ. There is an old master who, following the Satyasiddhi, takes acceptance as its essence. Master Bei says: it takes knowledge as its nature — hence this treatise says, 'knowledge, because of the successive seeking.' The Tripiṭaka-master says: it is a vow provisionally set up upon the willing-desire-and-faith of thought. Master Jing says: it takes resolute-conviction, willing, thought, and faith as its essence." Further, on why the vow of taking birth does not mention the evil destinies, Kuiji gives two intents 〔0557b12 onward; the Concise Compendium's own work 〔T43n1829 0155a28–b04〕: 「一、謂善趣利多,惡趣利少,略不論也;二、順八相唯在善趣故。又惡趣無自在,為王等化故」 tr. "first, the good destinies have much benefit, the evil destinies little, and so, abbreviating, it does not discuss them; second, according with the eight characters, [it is] only in the good destinies. Again, in the evil destinies there is no mastery, being a transformation as a king and the like"〕; the ten great vows, 「案地經辨十願與此論大義同」 tr. "considering the Daśabhūmika-sūtra's distinguishing of the ten vows, it agrees in general meaning with this treatise" (citing the Daśabhūmika-sūtra and the Daśabhūmika-sūtra-śāstra 〔0557b12–c01〕).
(viii) The Three Samādhis — Jing (the uncommon judgment) / Kuiji (the aspects matched-and-assigned · citing the Xianyang)
Jing says 〔T42n1828 0557c02–c04〕, see Heading III ★. Kuiji says 〔T43n1829 0155b05–b19; Dunlun records the same 0557c04–c17〕: 「此中空意,若相見道,唯苦下二行;無願文意,由有煩惱等言,故唯集四行、苦二行;無相文意,由有永滅寂靜言,唯滅下四」 tr. "the intent of emptiness herein, if by the characteristic path of seeing, is only the latter two aspects under 'suffering'; the intent of the wishlessness text, because there is the wording 'the afflictions and the rest,' is only the four aspects of 'origination' and the two aspects of 'suffering'; the intent of the no-character text, because there is the wording 'forever extinguished and stilled,' is only the four aspects under 'cessation'"; Bei sets out a differing account, 「有義:空行若約斷惑,通四諦」 tr. "there is a meaning: the emptiness-aspect, if with respect to cutting off delusion, runs through the four truths," 「如《顯揚》第二卷」 tr. "as in the Xianyang fascicle two" 〔0155b12〕, 「如《對法抄》」 tr. "as in the Abhidharma-notes"; Kuiji's own judgment, 「又此論文意,在真觀中義用分立此三解脫門,若斷惑,唯空行」 tr. "again, the intent of this treatise's text is that, within the true contemplation, these three gates of liberation are distinguished by function-in-meaning; if for cutting off delusion, only the emptiness-aspect" 〔0155b15〕. On the establishment-gateway Dunlun supplies: 「云我及我所,名為非有者,地持云:無我我所名無有」 tr. "as for 'self and what belongs to self, named the non-existent,' the Bodhisattvabhūmi says: without self and what-belongs-to-self is named the non-existent" 〔T42n1828 0557c17–c18〕; the concluding text, Dunlun's 「今解」 tr. "the present gloss" 〔0557c18–0558a02〕.
(ix) The Translation of the Name Uddāna — Dunlun (the name-correction entry) / Kuiji
Dunlun 〔T42n1828 0558a10–a16〕: 「自下第十五解四烏拕南,若作嗢字皆須改正,舊語不正,名四優陀那,翻名為印,今翻名說,即世尊常誦說……隨義傍翻亦得名印,或名總略義或名標相。如說無常是有為標相,苦是有漏法標相,無我是一切法標相,涅槃寂靜是無為法標相。若名嗢拕南則名集施。」 tr. "from here below, the fifteenth, glossing the four uḍḍāna: if it is written with the character wà, it must all be corrected — the old wording is not correct; it is named the four udāna, translated as 'seal,' now translated as 'to speak' — namely what the World-Honored One constantly recites and speaks … translated according to the sense, it may also be named 'seal,' or named 'the sense of the overall-abbreviation,' or named 'the seal-character.' As it is said, impermanence is the seal-character of the conditioned, suffering the seal-character of the contaminated dharmas, no-self the seal-character of all dharmas, nirvāṇa-quiescence the seal-character of the unconditioned dharmas. If named uḍḍāna, then it is named 'gathering-and-bestowing.'" Kuiji 〔T43n1829 0155c01–c05〕: 「此云說也,即世尊常誦說。此若嗢柁南,名攝散,即以略偈而攝長行……此義似無問自說也。」 tr. "this means 'to speak' — namely what the World-Honored One constantly recites and speaks. If this is uḍḍāna, it is named 'gathering the scattered' — namely, by a brief verse gathering the prose passage … this sense resembles the 'spoken without being asked.'"
(x) The Three Senses of Impermanence · the Three Times — Jing / Woncheuk (the two Western glosses) / the Tripiṭaka-master (the two glosses)
〔T42n1828 0558a23–b26〕: Jing says, 「此明依他自相不可言說。如眼證色……如飲冷水,證者自知必言說之不稱所證……隨其言說執有定性遍計所執,如此執時熏種成因,生彼依他色心等法有生即滅,故名無常」 tr. "this clarifies that the other-dependent's own character is not to be put into words. Just as the eye realizes form … as drinking cold water, the one who realizes it himself knows — surely speech would not answer to what is realized … grasping speech as having a settled nature is the wholly-imagined; when grasping thus, it perfumes seeds and becomes a cause, giving birth to those other-dependent forms, minds, and the like, which have arising and forthwith cease, and so are named impermanent"; Woncheuk says, 「由不了知如所有性等二種真實及世間等四種真實故,起諸戲論無明法執」 tr. "because of not thoroughly knowing the two kinds of reality, the nature 'just as it is' and the rest, and the four kinds of reality, the worldly and the rest, one raises the several idle proliferations and the ignorance-grasping of dharmas"; the three-times entry, Woncheuk says, 「於此文中西方兩釋……二云:唯識道理建立三世,謂於現在見分體上有三世相而得顯現」 tr. "within this text there are two Western glosses … a second says: by the reasoning of consciousness-only the three times are established — namely, upon the substance of the seeing-part in the present there appear the characters of the three times" 〔0558b14 onward〕; the Tripiṭaka-master's two glosses 〔0558b22〕: 「一云,未來本無以當有故故名無常……第二解云:當有名未來,正有之時當有無故名無常。」 tr. "one says, the future is originally absent, [named impermanent] because it is 'to be' … the second gloss says: 'to be' is named the future; and at the time of its being present, because 'to be' is absent, it is named impermanent."
(xi) The Four Characters of the Instant — Jing / Woncheuk / Kuiji / Dunlun (a further present gloss)
〔T42n1828 0558b26–0559a03〕: Jing says, 「三相現在同體,義說滅相過去。問曰:若爾即違經說即生即老即滅之言?解云:未必四相同時名為即也」 tr. "the three characters are in the present, of one substance; in sense, the character of ceasing is said to be in the past. Question: if so, does it not contradict the scripture's words 'just-arising, just-aging, just-ceasing'? Gloss: not necessarily are the four characters simultaneous, that they are called 'just-'"; Woncheuk says, 「述西方兩釋。一云,三相無前後……一云,三相有前後」 tr. "he sets out the two Western glosses. One says, the three characters have no before-and-after … one says, the three characters have before-and-after" 〔0558c04〕; Kuiji says, 「若即現在與異同時而名滅者,則滅是無法……如秤兩頭,平等平等,故一剎那有生有滅」 tr. "if, being simultaneous in the present with 'altering,' it is named ceasing, then ceasing is a non-existent dharma … like the two ends of a balance, level and even, and so in a single instant there is arising and there is ceasing" 〔Kuiji's own work T43n1829 0155c12–0156a28: 「若依小乘,生在未來,三相在現在;今依大乘,生等三相在現在,滅在過去」 tr. "if by the Lesser Vehicle, arising is in the future and the three characters in the present; now by the Great Vehicle, arising and the three characters are in the present, and ceasing in the past" · the balance simile 0156a11 · the two senses of gathering-abiding-into-altering and gathering-altering-into-abiding · the closing self-note 「下〈決擇〉五十三及〈本地〉第三卷抄」 tr. "see the notes on the Ascertainment fascicle 53 and the Basic Section fascicle 3 below"〕; Dunlun, a further present gloss: 「滅相約位雖在過去而假立為相者,猶在現在將滅之時……以此義故一剎那具有四相。然此論中約實無位說」 tr. "the character of ceasing, with respect to position, though it is in the past, yet as it is provisionally set up as a character, is still in the present, at the time about to cease … by this sense, a single instant is furnished with the four characters. Yet in this treatise it is spoken with respect to the real, positionless" 〔0558c28 onward〕.
(xii) Breaking the Arising of Arising · Breaking the Character of Ceasing — Kuiji (one instance of an internal "the Master / the meaning-statement" rebuttal)
〔T43n1829 0156a29–c08〕: 「以攝法遮法故……故遮遍遮」 tr. "because it gathers the dharma and blocks the dharma … and so the blocking is a universal blocking"; 「破生色之生亦應有生,即小乘中小生也」 tr. "breaking [the notion] that the arising of the arising of form ought also to have arising — that is the 'lesser arising' within the Lesser Vehicle" 〔0156b09–b11〕; 「非行生生即小生也,是行生生即大生也……故二生異,不應道理」 tr. "the arising of arising that is not [the arising] of activity is the lesser arising; the arising of arising that is [the arising] of activity is the greater arising … and so, the two arisings being different, it does not fit the reasoning" 〔0156b20 onward; Dunlun records Kuiji's gloss, the same 〔T42n1828 0559a03–b20〕〕; the outline of the character of ceasing, 「法師:上來一重破訖,次下第二別破滅相。義曰:不然……下舉後滅破,總是一翻」 tr. "the Master: from above, one round of breaking is done; next below, the second, separately breaking the character of ceasing. The meaning-statement: not so … below, it raises the later ceasing to break — it is altogether one round" 〔0156b26 onward〕 — Kuiji rebuts "the Master's" outline, only recorded. 「若滅為生所生時,一切諸法皆應不用功力而自然滅,如入滅定」 tr. "if ceasing, at the time it is produced by arising, then all phenomena ought, without employing effort, to cease of themselves, as though entering the attainment of cessation" 〔0156c02–c03〕. The school-judgment (Dunlun): 「若依薩婆多,法外別有非色非心四相之體,別體同時而用有先後。若依成實,同體各時……今大乘說……」 tr. "if by the Sarvāstivāda, apart from the dharma there is separately a substance of the four characters that is neither form nor mind, of separate substance simultaneous, its function having a before-and-after. If by the Satyasiddhi, of one substance at differing times … now the Great Vehicle says …" 〔T42n1828 0559a03 onward〕.
(xiii) The Twofold No-Self · the Threefold Matching of Nirvāṇa — Kuiji / Dunlun (one instance of correcting a transmitted gloss)
No-self: Kuiji 「謂破即蘊、異蘊計我也」 tr. "namely, breaking the reckoning of a self as identical-with or different-from the aggregates" 〔T43n1829 0156c11〕; Dunlun 「舊論云:於一切法有為無為無我我我所……相傳解云:無我者人無我,我我所者法無我,今則不爾……謂破則蘊異計我也」 tr. "the old treatise says: within all dharmas, conditioned and unconditioned, no-self and self-and-what-belongs-to-self … the transmitted gloss says: no-self is the no-self of the person, self-and-what-belongs-to-self is the no-self of dharmas; now it is not so … namely, breaking the reckoning of a self as identical-with or different-from the aggregates" 〔T42n1828 0559b21–b26〕. Nirvāṇa 「先因永斷,後無餘滅」, the threefold matching (Kuiji 〔T43n1829 0156c13–c17〕): 「即有餘、無餘涅槃也。又先因永斷,在無間道;後無餘斷,在解脫道。又先因永斷,在加行伏上心;後無餘斷,斷種子。」 tr. "these are the nirvāṇa-with-remainder and the nirvāṇa-without-remainder. Again, the prior cause forever cut off is in the uninterrupted path; the later cutting-off-without-remainder is in the path of liberation. Again, the prior cause forever cut off is subduing the higher mind in the applied-effort; the later cutting-off-without-remainder is cutting off the seeds."
(xiv) The Simile of the Prince and the Four Carts — There-Is-a-Gloss (matched to the three vehicles) / Master Kuiji (matched to the four nirvāṇas), Set Out Together (recorded by Dunlun)
〔T42n1828 0559b26–c21〕: 「言鹿、牛、馬、象者,有釋:鹿居山藪故喻獨覺,牛遲、馬疾,喻彼聲聞有鈍、有利。象,喻菩薩。基師云:喻四涅槃,象喻無住涅槃……謂鹿始終常居山靜,喻本來淨。牛有角故,喻有餘依。馬無角故,喻無餘依」 tr. "as for 'deer, ox, horse, elephant': there is a gloss — the deer, dwelling in the mountain thickets, figures the pratyekabuddha; the ox slow, the horse swift, figure that the śrāvakas are dull or keen. The elephant figures the bodhisattva. Master Kuiji says: it figures the four nirvāṇas — the elephant figures the non-abiding nirvāṇa … namely, the deer, from first to last ever dwelling in the mountain-stillness, figures the originally-pure; the ox, having horns, figures [the nirvāṇa] with remaining basis; the horse, being hornless, figures [the nirvāṇa] without remaining basis" 〔0559c12–c14〕; the sick-person simile, six passages of outline.
(xv) The Three Phrases of the Dharma-Teaching and Right-Teaching — Jing / Tai / Kuiji, the Three Houses (recorded by Dunlun; Kuiji's own work agrees)
〔T42n1828 0559c21–0560a08〕: Jing says, 「初三句者,下名正教……法教是總,下三句別」 tr. "as for the first three phrases, below they are named the right teaching … the dharma-teaching is the general, the three phrases below the particular"; Tai says, 「初三句為說菩薩乘三品……方便教名法教,根本教名正教也」 tr. "the first three phrases are for preaching the three grades of the bodhisattva-vehicle … the expedient teaching is named the dharma-teaching, the root teaching is named the right teaching"; Kuiji says, 「上極等三句一釋是聞慧,深極等三句是思慧,勝極等三句是修慧……又前三慧中,一一皆有法教正教等三句,次第配之」 tr. "the three phrases 'high, utmost,' and the rest, in one gloss, are the wisdom-from-hearing; the three phrases 'deep, deepest,' and the rest are the wisdom-from-reflection; the three phrases 'surpassing, utmost-surpassing,' and the rest are the wisdom-from-cultivation … again, within the former three wisdoms, each and every one has the three phrases, dharma-teaching, right-teaching, and the rest, matched to them in sequence" 〔Kuiji's own work T43n1829 0156c18–c25〕.
V. Terminology
| 漢 | Ancient-transmitted Sanskrit (transliteration · pronunciation aid) | Attestation | Precise sense |
|---|---|---|---|
| 嗢拕南/烏拕南/優陀那 | transliterated glyphs (Dunlun's name-correction: 「若作嗢字皆須改正,舊語不正,名四優陀那」 tr. "if written with the character wà it must all be corrected — the old wording is not correct; it is named the four udāna" 〔T42n1828 0558a10〕) | 〔this treatise 0544a08〕 | Dunlun: translated as "seal" / "to speak" / "the sense of the overall-abbreviation" / "the seal-character"; "gathering-and-bestowing." Kuiji: 「此云說也」 tr. "this means 'to speak'" 〔T43n1829 0155c01〕 |
| 陀羅尼 | transliterated glyph | 〔this treatise 0542c16〕 | Dhāraṇī, the sustaining; four kinds (dharma / meaning / spell / attaining the bodhisattva's acceptance) |
| 忍陀羅尼呪詞 | 壹胝蜜胝吉胝毘羼底鉢陀膩莎訶 (the Taishō appends the phonetic gloss 「丁里反」 · collation notes 0543001/0543002) | 〔this treatise 0543a07–a08〕 | 「都無有義,是圓成實」 tr. "altogether without meaning, it is the perfectly-accomplished real" — the spell expresses nothing, rightly conveying the ineffable (Bei: 「呪句正詮依他圓成離言無生」 tr. "the spell-phrases rightly convey that the other-dependent and the perfectly-accomplished are ineffable and unarisen") |
| 吠地迦呪 | transliterated glyphs (Kuiji 「此云明呪也」 tr. "this means the illumining spell" 〔T43n1829 0154b07〕) | 〔this treatise 0540b18〕 | The brahmin Vaidika spell-craft |
| 覩史多天 | transliterated glyphs | 〔this treatise 0542b15〕 | The Tuṣita heaven (the first of the eight characters of the skill in means of ultimate purity) |
| 摩怛理迦 | transliterated glyphs | 〔this treatise 0543b07〕 | The matrix (mātṛkā) (the mātṛkā of the bodhisattva-canon) |
| 舍摩他·毘婆舍那 | transliterated glyphs (T1582 renders tranquillity-and-insight by transliteration 〔0994c28–0995a02〕) | 〔collation〕 | Tranquillity · insight |
For this sub-part the ancient-transmitted Sanskrit transliterations are, apart from the spell-words and the several transliterated names above, largely absent; entries not attested are not reconstructed from modern critical editions (the Taishō editor's three conjectural Sanskrit notes — 0540001 / 0540002 / 0540005 — are not transmitted by the ancient masters and are not adopted).
VI. Similes · Rhetoric
(1) The open-space simile (reconciling "all equal to open space") — 〔0541a28–0541b10〕 forms and form-activities dispelled, only the pure open space of the nature-without-form appearing in its character: figuring the dispelling, by wondrous holy knowledge, of the idle proliferation of speech, only the ineffable thing appearing; Kuiji 「此喻真如如空,遍計如色等」 tr. "this figures suchness as being like open space, and the wholly-imagined as being like forms and the rest" 〔T43n1829 0154c04–c05〕.
(2) The illusion-and-dream simile (reconciling "all like an illusion or a dream") — 〔0541b13–b17〕 「非如顯現如實是有,亦非一切幻夢形質都無所有……非有非無,其性無二」 tr. "not, as they appear, really existent in accord with the real, and yet the shape and stuff of all illusions and dreams are not altogether nothing at all … neither existent nor non-existent, their nature not-two"; Kuiji 「喻依他如幻等」 tr. "it figures the other-dependent as being like an illusion and the rest" 〔0154c09〕.
(3) The rabbit's horn (Kuiji's gloss-simile) — 〔T43n1829 0154c01〕 「如此言說所說自性如兔角故」 tr. "since the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken that is expressed in such speech is like a rabbit's horn": the ancients' habitual simile for the wholly-imagined intrinsic-nature-as-spoken being utterly absent.
(4) A single ball of meal (a slight root of goodness draws down an immeasurable fruit) — 〔0540b03〕 「乃至最下唯一麨團,施鄙穢田乃至蠢動傍生之類……由迴向力,感無量果」 tr. "down even to the very lowest, a single ball of meal, bestowed on a lowly and filthy field, down even to the class of squirming, creeping beasts … by the force of the turning-over, it draws down an immeasurable fruit": the gift of the utmost smallness, by the condition of the turning-over, becoming immeasurable.
(5) The two ends of a balance (arising and ceasing simultaneous in the instant) — 〔T43n1829 0156a11〕 「如秤兩頭,平等平等,故一剎那有生有滅」 tr. "like the two ends of a balance, level and even, and so in a single instant there is arising and there is ceasing": Kuiji's gloss-simile.
(6) The simile of the prince and the four carts (the resolute conviction in nirvāṇa) — 〔0545a01–0545b02〕 the made-up deer-, ox-, horse-, and elephant-carts → the real deer, ox, horse, and elephant: figuring that the one who has not seen the truths, toward nirvāṇa, raises a resolute conviction only in dependence on a resembling image, and only on seeing the truths knows, and follows up with shame at his former understanding; Master Kuiji matches it to the four nirvāṇas (the elephant = the non-abiding) 〔T42n1828 0559c12–c14〕. In the simile's figuring passage, 「先為假作鹿、牛等車,喻為宣說涅槃鹿相」 tr. "the making-up for them, at first, of the deer, ox, and the other carts figures the proclaiming for them of the deer-character of nirvāṇa" 〔0545a20–a21〕 — 「鹿相」 "deer-character" is as the base text has it (the Taishō has no collation note; the two commentaries have no catch-phrase), matching the following line 「次為讚說真實鹿等」 tr. "next praising the real deer and the rest" 〔0545a21〕 (the character of the made-up deer / the real deer); the vernacular keeps the base-text glyph.
(7) The simile of the sick one and the good medicine (the graded sequence of the dharma-teaching) — 〔0545b03–b18〕 the former medicine cures the former illness, the later illness needs the later medicine, the sick one grasps the former medicine and will not cast it off: figuring being unable, toward the Buddha's prior-and-later, shallower-and-deeper dharma-teachings, to cast off one's grasp and advance in practice; gathered up in 「妙莊嚴車無上法乘,如善御者……疾疾進趣,無所稽留」 tr. "the wondrously adorned cart, the unsurpassed dharma-vehicle, like a good driver … swiftly and swiftly pressing onward, with nothing detaining him" 〔0545b19–b21〕.
VII. Cross-Reading
- Sub-part one (15-01-17-01): Gate 9's contemplation of the body along the body 「遠離言說自性」 tr. "keeping far from the intrinsic nature as spoken" 〔0539c10〕 opens directly into this sub-part's Gate 10 tranquillity 「離言唯事」 tr. "the ineffable bare thing" 〔0539c29〕; Kuiji's threefold-nature matching gloss (sub-part one, Heading III ★) is of the same source as this sub-part's threefold-nature matching in the reconciling passage.
- The Chapter on the True Reality (15-01-04): the reconciling-the-hidden-intent passage's 「但說諸法所言自性都無所有」 tr. "it says only that the intrinsic-nature-as-spoken of phenomena is altogether nothing at all" 〔0541a21〕 + 「不取少分、不捨少分」 tr. "grasping no small part, forsaking no small part" 〔0541b19〕 = the practice-form of the Chapter on the True Reality's ineffable intrinsic nature · non-dual Middle Way · well-grasped emptiness; the samādhi of emptiness 〔0543c07〕 is along the same line.
- The Chapter on Might (15-01-05): 「現神通、記心、顯說」 tr. "displaying supernormal powers, mind-reading, disclosing preaching," Kuiji glossing 「即三輪也」 tr. "these are the three spheres" 〔T43n1829 0154b18〕.
- The Chapter on Maturation / the Chapter on the Gathering of Events (15-01-06 / 15): the six outward kinds (entering-in / ripening / liberation) run in a vein with the Chapter on Maturation's six gateways and the Chapter on the Gathering of Events' four-means modes.
- The Section on Ascertainment: the ascertainment of the substance of Chapter 17, 0712c07–0713b01 (Heading II (ii)); the broad-and-narrow of the names samādhi / gate-of-liberation, 0698c06–c14; the chapter-boundary, Jing's and Dunlun's (following the Tripiṭaka-master) two judgments recorded together 〔T42n1828 0770b07–b10〕.
- The Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra: the terminology-system of the character-bond and the coarse-and-heavy-bond (cited in the root treatise fasc. 75 〔0716b16〕) — the tranquillity-and-insight chapter's broad ascertainment is there (by Dunlun's judgment belonging to the range of the ascertainment of the Chapter on Qualities, stable citation).
- The alternate translations: Dharmakṣema, the Chapter on Awakening, the seventeenth (Gate 11 cut across by the four-means re-emerging passage · the ten great vows complete at ten) · Guṇavarman, the two Chapters 18 / 19 (the great vow has no set of ten · the five practices of spell-upholding unique to it · the nirvāṇa-passage expanded, "the Tathāgata is in truth constant" 〔0998a10〕) — for the collation, see Heading II.
Cross-reading is by stable citation (canon number · page-anchor) for the most part.
VIII. Placement of the Critical Editions
- Xuanzang T1579 (base text): this sub-part 〔0539c24–0545b21〕, gate-boundaries (self-verified anchor by anchor): Gate 10 opening line 0539c24 (outline-item boundary at close of 0539c23) · the four practices of tranquillity 0539c26–0540a02 · the four practices of insight 0540a04–a08 · Gate 11 0540a10 (the six kinds 0540c27/0541b24/0541c26/0542a21/0542b03/0542b13 · reconciling the hidden intent 0541a13–0541b21) · Gate 12 0542c16 (dharma 0542c19 · meaning 0542c23 · spell 0542c26 · acceptance 0543a01 · the spell-words 0543a07–a08 · the perfectly-accomplished real 0543a11 · the ineffable intrinsic nature is the meaning of intrinsic nature 0543a17 · the Ground of Practice-through-Resolute-Conviction 0543a23 · the four qualities 0543b02) · Gate 13 0543b08 (the ten great vows from 0543b17) · Gate 14 0543c07 (wishlessness 0543c09 · no-character 0543c15 · the establishment 0543c17–c24) · the third-part fascicle title 0544a06–a07 · Gate 15 0544a08 (the three-sense naming 0544a13–a17 · impermanence 0544a19–0544c12 · suffering 0544c13 · no-self 0544c16–c23 · nirvāṇa from 0544c24 · the prince simile 0545a01 · the sick-one-medicine simile 0545b03 · the gathering 0545b19–b21) · the chapter-closing line 0545b21 · the Chapter-on-Qualities fascicle-title / chapter-title 0545b22–b23.
- The alternate translations: Dharmakṣema T1581 〔tranquillity-and-insight 0930a05–a07 · the twelve skillful means 0930a16–a17 · the six names 0932c17–c19 · the four dhāraṇīs 0934a03 · the spell-words 0934a17 · the five vows 0934b10–b11 · the ten great vows 0934b16–b22 · the samādhi of emptiness 0934b24 · the four udāna 0934c10–c12〕.
- The Section on Ascertainment: 0712c07 the contemplation of the body along the suchness-body · 0712c10 tying the mind to the object of suchness · 0712c15–c23 the sequence of the path-factors (the faculties lower-grade, the powers higher-grade 0712c20) · 0712c24 the fourteen character-and-coarse-and-heavy bonds · 0713a03 cultivating the foundations of mindfulness in dependence on emptiness · 0713a12 the eleven successive conception-bonds · 0713a29–b01 the gathering-line · 0698c06–c14 the broad-and-narrow of the three names (0698c09 right knowledge running through the three).
- Dunlun T1828: this sub-part corresponds to 〔0555c07–0560a08〕.
- Kuiji T1829: this sub-part corresponds to 〔0153c29–0156c25〕.
- Jinaputra T1580: no chapter-level exposition (recorded as it stands, see Heading I).
- Collation: this sub-part's span's Taishō collation notes, all 26 enumerated (Heading II (iii) · the base text follows the CBETA character-readings · no critical-edition emendation raised; the fourth practice of tranquillity "no character / conception" the four editions' variant · the tenth great vow "the second right vow / great vow" the Yuan-Ming variant — all recorded alongside); the Taishō's three conjectural Sanskrit notes not adopted.