瑜伽師地論 三摩呬多地 · 攝諸經宗要·三摩缽底
門五(攝諸經宗要)第三段,亦三摩呬多地之唯識結穴:五現見・無想・滅盡三等至。
一句話:等至到最後三種——五現見(見諦人觀識流轉)、無想(觀想如病如癰如箭)、滅盡(諸心心法滅);而把全地推到頂點的,是滅盡定『心都滅了還剩什麼』一問——答曰:剩那個執持轉識種子、執持根身的第八阿賴耶識,定學之底徹是唯識。
三個眼目
-
五現見=見諦人的觀,連「識在流轉」都看分明。五皆聖得、親明了觀(不同小宗)〔窺基 T1829 0084a07〕。先不淨觀(內身·骨人),再「觀識流轉」——麁觀行緣識一期相續、細觀剎那心識異生異滅(遁倫引《俱舍》算臘縛牟呼栗多時分〔T1828 0398c10〕)。見諦定不按死心,是把識的流轉看透。
-
滅盡定一問=三摩呬多地的結穴。「諸心心法並皆滅盡,云何說識不離於身?」答:「由不變壞諸色根中,有能執持轉識種子阿賴耶識不滅盡故」〔T1579 0340c28〕——停的是前六(七)轉識,第八阿賴耶不滅、執持根身。經論四層相銜:阿含「滅盡定不捨壽煖根≠死」〔雜568 0150b13〕→解深密「阿陀那於身隨逐執持」〔T676 0692b15〕→攝決擇分八相證之「處無心定·識不離身」〔T1579 0579c13〕→成唯識論「不離身者彼識即第八識」〔T1585 0018c20〕。此即地01「種子依即阿賴耶識」在定學最深處的兌現。
-
入有止觀·出觸三空。入滅盡定須二法多有所作:八次第定=奢摩他、所有聖慧=毘鉢舍那,缺一不入。出定觸三觸(不動·無所有·無相,緣有境/境境/滅境),與等持門空·無願·無相三三摩地相應。無想「如病如癰如箭」三喻、滅盡「八次第定/聖慧」配,皆論本自立(古德此段從闕);「識不離身」之唯識義依攝決擇八相證+成唯識論。
The third passage of Gate Five (Gathering the Purport of the Sūtras), and also the Consciousness-Only knot where the Stage of Meditative Equipoise is tied off: the three attainments of present-seeing, no-perception, and cessation.
In one line: The attainments, down to their last three — present-seeing (one who has seen the truths contemplating consciousness turning-and-flowing), no-perception (contemplating perception as a sickness, a boil, an arrow), and cessation (the various minds and mental factors ceasing); and what drives the whole stage to its summit is the attainment of cessation's one question, "the mind itself has ceased — what remains?" The answer: there remains that eighth store consciousness which appropriates and holds the seeds of the turning consciousnesses and appropriates the faculty-body. The very floor of the science of concentration is, through and through, Consciousness-Only.
Three Points of the Eye
-
Present-seeing = the contemplation of one who has seen the truths, seeing even "consciousness turning-and-flowing" clearly and distinctly. These five are all attained by the noble ones alone, a directly-clear contemplation (differing from the Lesser Vehicle's account) 〔Kuiji, T1829 0084a07〕. First the contemplation of the impure (one's own body, the skeleton-person), then "the contemplation of the turning-and-flowing of consciousness" — the coarse contemplation of the continuity of "consciousness conditioned by formations" across a single span of life, the fine contemplation of consciousness instant by instant "arising differently and ceasing differently" (Dunlun cites the Abhidharmakośa, reckoning out the time-units lava and muhūrta 〔T1828 0398c10〕). The concentration of one who has seen the truths does not press the mind to death; it sees clean through how consciousness turns-and-flows.
-
The one question of the attainment of cessation = the knot where the Stage of Meditative Equipoise is tied off. "The various minds and mental factors have one and all ceased — how then can it be said that consciousness does not depart from the body?" Answer: "It is because, among the unaltered, unbroken material faculties, there is the store consciousness that is able to appropriate and hold the seeds of the turning consciousnesses, and it does not cease" 〔T1579 0340c28〕 — what stops is the former six (seven) turning consciousnesses; the eighth store consciousness does not cease and appropriates the faculty-body. A four-layered chain of scripture and treatise interlocks: the Āgama ("the attainment of cessation, not relinquishing life and warmth and the faculties, ≠ death") 〔Saṃyukta 568, 0150b13〕 → the Saṃdhinirmocana ("the ādāna follows along and appropriates the body") 〔T676 0692b15〕 → the Section on Ascertainment, the eight-characteristic proof, at "the mindless concentrations · consciousness does not depart from the body" 〔T1579 0579c13〕 → the Cheng Weishi Lun ("that which does not depart from the body — that consciousness is just the eighth consciousness") 〔T1585 0018c20〕. This is Stage One's "the seed-support is the store consciousness," redeemed at the very deepest point of the science of concentration.
-
Entering has stilling and insight; emerging touches three emptinesses. To enter the attainment of cessation two dharmas must "have much to do" with it: the eight successive concentrations = tranquillity (śamatha), all the noble wisdom = insight (vipaśyanā); lacking either, one cannot enter. On emerging one touches three contacts (the unmoving, nothingness, the markless — by way of the existent-field / the object-field / the ceased-field), answering to the emptiness, wishlessness, and marklessness concentrations of the "concentration" gate. No-perception's three similes ("as a sickness, a boil, an arrow") and cessation's pairing ("the eight successive concentrations / the noble wisdom") are both set up by the treatise itself (the ancient masters offer no gloss on this passage); the Consciousness-Only meaning of "consciousness does not depart from the body" rests on the Section on Ascertainment's eight-characteristic proof together with the Cheng Weishi Lun.
復次,
云何五現見三摩鉢底?謂諸苾芻,即於此身等,廣說如經。已見諦者修此等至,是故名為現見等至。是諸修道所斷煩惱制伏對治、斷滅對治,及觀察斷。當知此中總略體性。初不淨觀,方便念住以為依止,為令欲貪不現行故,觀察內身種種不淨。第二不淨觀,即彼念住以為依止,乃至觀察骨人之相,為令彼貪不現行故,觀察此身種種不淨。當知齊此,名具觀察一切不淨。最極通達者,是青瘀等觀品類次第、極逾越義。初不淨觀,觀察內身現前安住種種不淨。後不淨觀,通達法性。觀察此身有如是法,有如是性,乃至廣說。觀識流轉者,觀察此識生滅相續。或觀生身展轉相續。謂麁觀察行緣識等。或觀剎那展轉相續。謂細觀察若有貪心、離貪心等品類差別,荏苒過度彼彼日夜、剎那、臘縛、牟呼栗多,於其中間非一眾多種種心識異生異滅。觀察有學未離欲者,俱住二世;已離欲者,惟住他世;阿羅漢果,俱無所住。如是名為觀察於斷。勝處等至遍處等至。如前已說。
復次,
云何無想三摩鉢底?謂已離遍淨欲,未離上欲,求出離想作意為先,諸心心法滅。 問:以何方便入此等至? 答:觀想如病、如癰、如箭,入第四靜慮,修背想作意,於所生起種種想中厭背而住。唯謂無想寂靜微妙,於無想中持心而住。如是漸次離諸所緣,心便寂滅。於此生中,亦入亦起。若生於彼,唯入不起。其想若生,便從彼沒。
復次,
云何滅盡三摩鉢底?謂已離無所有處欲,暫安住想作意為先,諸心心法滅。 問:以何方便入此等至? 答:若諸聖者,已離無所有處欲。或依非想非非想處相而入於定,或依滅盡相而入於定。依非想非非想處相而入定者,謂於此上心深生厭捨,非想非非想處進趣所緣皆滅盡故,心便寂滅。依滅盡相而入定者,亦復如是。將欲趣入滅盡定時,有二種法多有所作。謂奢摩他、毘鉢舍那。
云何奢摩他?
云何毘鉢舍那?
云何此二多有所作?謂於此義中,八次第定名奢摩他,所有聖慧名毘鉢舍那。於此二中隨闕一種,即不能入滅盡等至;要具此二,方能趣入。是故此二多有所作。 問:入滅定時,
云何次第滅三種行? 答:此有二種。謂行時、住時。若於行時,亦起言說。於初靜慮有此作用,有語行故。若於住時,從第二靜慮已上次第定力,彼三種行次第而滅。當知出時,由逆次第次第而起。 問:滅盡定中,諸心心法並皆滅盡。
云何說識不離於身? 答:由不變壞諸色根中,有能執持轉識種子阿賴耶識不滅盡故,後時彼法從此得生。 問:入滅定時,無有分別:我當入定,我當出定。正在定時,心寂滅故,遠離加行。將出定時,心先滅故,亦無作意。
云何能入?
云何能出? 答:先於其心善修治故。若有諸行、諸狀、諸相,能入於定、能出於定,於彼修習、極多修習;由修習故,任運能入、任運能出。
云何出滅定時觸三種觸?一、不動觸,二、無所有觸,三、無相觸。謂出定時,多由三境而出於定。一、由有境,二、由境境,三、由滅境。由此三境,於出定時,如其次第觸三種觸。緣於有境而出定時,無有我慢擾動其心。謂此為我、而起我慢,或計未來我當有等,乃至廣說。是故說言觸不動觸。緣於境境而出定時,無貪所有、無瞋所有、無癡所有。是故言觸無所有觸。緣於滅境而出定時,於一切相不思惟故,緣無相界。是故說言觸無相觸。如是已說靜慮、解脫、等持、等至。
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
一、五現見三摩缽底
什麼是五現見三摩缽底?「諸苾芻即於此身等」(廣說如經)。已見諦(見道)的人修這等至,所以名為「現見等至」。這是對諸修道所斷煩惱的「制伏對治、斷滅對治,及觀察斷」——當知此中是總略體性。
- 初不淨觀:以「方便念住」為依止,為令欲貪不現行,觀察內身種種不淨。
- 第二不淨觀:即以那念住為依止,乃至觀察「骨人之相」,為令彼貪不現行,觀察此身種種不淨——當知到此,名「具觀察一切不淨」。所謂「最極通達」,是青瘀等觀的品類次第、極逾越(貪等)之義。
- 〔兩番釋〕初不淨觀,觀察內身現前安住種種不淨;後不淨觀,通達法性,觀察此身有如是法、有如是性(乃至廣說)。
- 觀識流轉:觀察此識生滅相續。或觀「生身展轉相續」(麁觀,即觀行緣識等);或觀「剎那展轉相續」(細觀,即觀有貪心、離貪心等品類差別,荏苒過度彼彼日夜、剎那、臘縛、牟呼栗多,於其中間非一眾多種種心識異生異滅)。
- 觀察於斷:觀有學未離欲者,識俱住二世(現在、未來);已離欲者,唯住他世(未來);阿羅漢果,俱無所住。如是名為觀察於斷。
(勝處等至、遍處等至,如前〔解脫子段〕已說。)
二、無想三摩缽底
什麼是無想三摩缽底?已離遍淨欲、未離上欲的人,以「求出離想」作意為先,諸心、心法滅。 問:以什麼方便入此等至?答:觀想「如病、如癰、如箭」,入第四靜慮,修「背想」作意,於所生起的種種想中厭背而住;唯謂無想寂靜微妙,於無想中持心而住。如是漸次離諸所緣,心便寂滅。於此生中,亦入亦起;若生於彼〔無想天〕,唯入不起;其想若生,便從彼沒〔退〕。
三、滅盡三摩缽底
什麼是滅盡三摩缽底?已離無所有處欲的人,以「暫安住想」作意為先,諸心、心法滅。 問:以什麼方便入此等至?答:若諸聖者已離無所有處欲,或依「非想非非想處相」而入定、或依「滅盡相」而入定。依非想非非想處相入定者,是於此上心深生厭捨,非想非非想處進趣的所緣皆滅盡故,心便寂滅;依滅盡相入定者也這樣。 將欲趣入滅盡定時,有二種法「多有所作」,就是奢摩他、毘鉢舍那。什麼是奢摩他?什麼是毘鉢舍那?什麼是此二多有所作?此中,「八次第定」名奢摩他、「所有聖慧」名毘鉢舍那;此二中隨缺一種即不能入滅盡等至,要具此二方能趣入,所以此二多有所作。
問:入滅定時,如何次第滅三種行?答:有二種,謂行時、住時。若於行時,亦起言說(於初靜慮有此作用,有語行);若於住時,從第二靜慮以上,由次第定力,那三種行次第而滅。當知出時,由逆次第而起。
問:滅盡定中,諸心心法並皆滅盡,怎麼說「識不離於身」?答:由不變壞的諸色根中,有「能執持轉識種子的阿賴耶識」不滅盡故,後時那些法從此〔阿賴耶〕得生。
問:入滅定時,沒有「我當入定、我當出定」的分別;正在定時心寂滅故、遠離加行;將出定時心先滅故、亦無作意——那怎麼能入、怎麼能出?答:先於其心善修治故。若有諸行、諸狀、諸相能入定、能出定,於彼修習、極多修習,由修習故便任運能入、任運能出。
〔出定三觸〕什麼是出滅定時觸三種觸?一、不動觸,二、無所有觸,三、無相觸。出定時多由三境而出:一由有境、二由境境、三由滅境,如其次第觸三種觸。緣有境出定時,無有我慢擾動其心(不起「此為我」的我慢、或計未來我當有等),故說觸「不動觸」;緣境境出定時,無貪所有、無瞋所有、無癡所有,故說觸「無所有觸」;緣滅境出定時,於一切相不思惟、緣無相界,故說觸「無相觸」。
如是已說靜慮、解脫、等持、等至〔三摩呬多地門五攝諸經宗要畢〕。
The 漢 root text (Xuanzang, T30n1579) is kept as a de-emphasized visual anchor for bilingual readers; the English below renders every word of it in plain, continuous prose.
One · The Five Attainments of Present-Seeing (五現見三摩缽底)
What is the attainment of present-seeing that is fivefold? "The various monks, [contemplating] just upon this body, and so on" (expounded at length as in the sūtra). It is one who has already seen the truths (the path of seeing) who cultivates this attainment, and so it is named "the attainment of present-seeing." This is, with respect to the afflictions to be cut off by the various paths of cultivation, a "counteragent that suppresses, a counteragent that severs, and the contemplation-that-severs" — it should be understood that what is given here is the intrinsic nature stated overall and in brief.
- The first contemplation of the impure: taking "the skillful-means establishment of mindfulness" as its support, so as to keep sensual craving from becoming active, one contemplates the many kinds of impurity within one's own body.
- The second contemplation of the impure: taking that very establishment of mindfulness as its support, and going on to contemplate "the aspect of the skeleton-person," so as to keep that craving from becoming active, one contemplates the many kinds of impurity of this body — it should be understood that, reaching this point, it is named "possessing the contemplation of all that is impure." What is called "reaching the very utmost through-and-through" is the sense of the categorical sequence of the contemplation of the livid-bruised [corpse] and the like, and of the utter overleaping (of craving and the rest).
- 〔A twofold gloss〕In the first contemplation of the impure, one contemplates the many kinds of impurity abiding present within one's own body; in the latter contemplation of the impure, one penetrates the nature of the dharma, contemplating that this body has such-and-such a dharma and has such-and-such a nature (expounded at length, and so on).
- The contemplation of the turning-and-flowing of consciousness: one contemplates the arising-and-ceasing and continuity of this consciousness. Either one contemplates "the successive continuity of the born body" (the coarse contemplation — that is, contemplating consciousness-conditioned-by-formations and the rest); or one contemplates "the successive continuity of instant-by-instant" (the fine contemplation — that is, contemplating the categorical distinctions of a mind-with-craving, a mind-free-of-craving, and so on, elapsing and passing over those several days and nights, instants, lavas, and muhūrtas, and in the intervals between them the non-single, manifold, many-kinded arising-differently and ceasing-differently of consciousness).
- The contemplation directed at severance: one contemplates that, for a learner not yet freed from craving, consciousness together [with its factors] abides in two times (present and future); for one already freed from craving, it abides only in the other time (the future); at the fruit of the arhat, it abides in neither. In this way it is named the contemplation directed at severance.
(The attainments of the bases-of-mastery and the attainments of the totalities have already been stated above 〔in the passage on the liberations〕.)
Two · The Attainment of No-Perception (無想三摩缽底)
What is the attainment of no-perception? It is one who has already become free from craving for the Universally-Pure [heaven] but not yet free from craving above it who, taking as prior the attending "with the perception that seeks release," brings the various minds and mental factors to cessation.
Question: By what skillful means does one enter this attainment? Answer: One contemplates the perception [of the lower states] "as a sickness, as a boil, as an arrow," enters the fourth dhyāna, cultivates the attending "that turns its back on perception," and abides turning away in aversion from the various perceptions that arise; regarding only the stilled, subtle, and sublime state of no-perception, one holds the mind steady and abides within no-perception. In this way, gradually departing from the various objects, the mind comes to be stilled and ceased. Within this present life one both enters and emerges [from it]; but if one is born there 〔in the heaven of no-perception〕, one only enters and does not emerge; and if perception arises, one at once passes away from there 〔falls back〕.
Three · The Attainment of Cessation (滅盡三摩缽底)
What is the attainment of cessation? It is one who has already become free from craving for the sphere of nothingness who, taking as prior the attending "with the perception of a brief abiding," brings the various minds and mental factors to cessation.
Question: By what skillful means does one enter this attainment? Answer: If the various noble ones have already become free from craving for the sphere of nothingness, they enter concentration either "in dependence on the aspect of the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception" or "in dependence on the aspect of cessation." For one who enters concentration in dependence on the aspect of the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, it is because, generating a deep aversion-and-relinquishing toward the mind above this, all the objects that the advance-and-approach of the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception [would take] come to be ceased, and so the mind comes to be stilled and ceased; and for one who enters concentration in dependence on the aspect of cessation, it is likewise so.
When one is about to advance into the attainment of cessation, there are two dharmas that "have much to do" [with the entering] — namely tranquillity (śamatha) and insight (vipaśyanā). What is tranquillity? What is insight? What is it for these two to "have much to do" with it? Herein, "the eight successive concentrations" are named tranquillity, and "all the noble wisdom [there is]" is named insight; if either one of these two is lacking, one cannot enter the attainment of cessation; only by possessing these two can one advance into it — and so these two "have much to do" with it.
Question: When one enters the attainment of cessation, in what sequence do the three kinds of formation cease? Answer: There are two [cases], namely the time of moving-about and the time of abiding. If it is at the time of moving-about, verbal expression too arises (this activity is present in the first dhyāna, where there is the formation of speech); if it is at the time of abiding, then from the second dhyāna upward, by the force of the successive concentrations, those three kinds of formation cease in sequence. And it should be understood that, at the time of emerging, they arise in the reverse sequence.
Question: Within the attainment of cessation, the various minds and mental factors have one and all ceased — how then can it be said that "consciousness does not depart from the body"? Answer: It is because, among the unaltered, unbroken material faculties, there is "the store consciousness that is able to appropriate and hold the seeds of the turning consciousnesses," and it does not cease — so that afterward those dharmas [the turning consciousnesses] come to arise again from this 〔store consciousness〕.
Question: When one enters the attainment of cessation, there is no discriminating thought "I shall enter the attainment, I shall emerge from the attainment"; and while properly within the attainment the mind is stilled and ceased and so is far from any preparatory effort; and when one is about to emerge, since the mind has ceased beforehand, there is likewise no attending [that reaches out] — how then is one able to enter, and able to emerge? Answer: It is because one has beforehand well cultivated-and-purified one's mind. If there are formations, states, and aspects that are able to enter the attainment and able to emerge from it, and one cultivates them, cultivates them exceedingly much — then, by the force of that cultivation, one comes to enter effortlessly and to emerge effortlessly.
〔The three contacts on emerging from the attainment〕What are the three kinds of contact that one touches when emerging from the attainment of cessation? First, the contact of the unmoving; second, the contact of nothingness; third, the contact of the markless. On emerging from the attainment, one emerges for the most part by way of three fields: first by way of the existent-field, second by way of the object-field, third by way of the ceased-field — and in that very sequence one touches the three kinds of contact. When one emerges from the attainment taking the existent-field as object, there is no self-conceit stirring and disturbing one's mind (there does not arise the self-conceit "this is I," or the reckoning "in the future I shall be," and the like), and so it is said that one touches "the contact of the unmoving." When one emerges taking the object-field as object, there is nothing that is craving, nothing that is aversion, nothing that is delusion, and so it is said that one touches "the contact of nothingness." When one emerges taking the ceased-field as object, one does not think upon any mark [whatsoever] but takes the markless realm as object, and so it is said that one touches "the contact of the markless."
In this way there have now been stated the dhyānas, the liberations, the concentrations, and the attainments 〔the fifth gate of the Stage of Meditative Equipoise, "Gathering the Purport of the Sūtras," is herewith complete〕.
等至到最後三種:現見、無想、滅盡
「攝諸經宗要」門前面講了解脫、等持,這「三摩缽底」(等至)是第三段。等至本有六種(五現見、八勝處、十遍處、四無色、無想、滅盡),可勝處遍處前面解脫子段講過了、四無色與解脫不異,所以這裡只釋三種:五現見、無想、滅盡。而這三種裡,前一種講「觀」、後兩種講「滅」——一步步把心收到極處,直收到「諸心心法並皆滅盡」。問題就在這個極處冒出來:心都滅了,還剩什麼?這一問,把整個三摩呬多地推到了它的結穴。
五現見:見諦人的觀,連「識在流轉」都看給你看
五現見三摩缽底,是「已見諦者」(見道以上的聖者)才修的,所以叫「現見」——親自明了地觀,不是凡夫的想像。古德特別點出:這五種「五皆聖得」,跟小乘把前二叫現見、後三只是緣起所生不同(窺基《略纂》)。它先修不淨觀(觀內身不淨、觀骨人之相),再進到「觀識流轉」——這一觀最見唯識的眼力:觀「此識生滅相續」,麁的觀「行緣識」一期生死的相續,細的觀一剎那一剎那的心識「異生異滅」,在日夜、剎那、臘縛、牟呼栗多之間,無數心識生了又滅、滅了又生(遁倫還引《俱舍》把這些時分單位一一算給你聽)。見諦人的定,不是把心按死,是把『識怎麼流轉』看得分明——這已經為後面「滅盡定還剩第八識」埋了線。
無想與滅盡:把「想」當病、當癰、當箭
無想、滅盡這兩種,都是「諸心心法滅」的定,可入法不同。無想定,是「已離遍淨欲、未離上欲」的人,以「求出離想」為先而入——論用了三個極利的喻說它的入法:「觀想如病、如癰、如箭」。把「想」當作身上的病、化膿的癰、扎進的箭,厭它、背它,於是入第四靜慮修「背想作意」,種種想都厭背了,心便寂滅。這三喻是論本自己設的,古德此段沒有別釋。
滅盡定更深一層,是「已離無所有處欲」的聖者,到非想非非想處之上、連那最細的想也厭捨,諸心心法滅盡。論說,要入滅盡定,有兩樣「多有所作」的法——奢摩他與毘鉢舍那;而且把這一對配得很具體:「八次第定」是奢摩他、「所有聖慧」是毘鉢舍那,二者缺一就入不了滅盡定。止與觀,到了定的最深處,仍是一雙不可缺的腳。
結穴一問:心都滅了,怎麼還說「識不離於身」?
滅盡定講到這裡,論替我們問出了那個最尖的問題:「滅盡定中,諸心心法並皆滅盡,云何說識不離於身?」——前六轉識(連意識)全停了,經裡卻偏說「識不離身」,這「識」是什麼?
論答得極簡、極重:「由不變壞諸色根中,有能執持轉識種子阿賴耶識不滅盡故」。原來滅盡定裡停掉的,是前六(乃至七)轉識;可那個含藏一切轉識種子、執持根身的第八阿賴耶識,並沒有滅——正因它還在執持,根身才不壞,出定後諸識才能從它重新生起。
這一答,不是論主孤立的斷言,它接著一條完整的經論鏈:佛在《雜阿含》早說,滅盡定異於死,正在「不捨壽命、不離於暖、諸根不壞」——可誰在執持這壽、煖、根?《解深密經》答:是阿陀那識,「於身隨逐執持」,這阿陀那即是阿賴耶。本論自己的後分〈攝決擇分〉更以「八相」證阿賴耶決定是有,其中第七相正是「處無心定」:「謂入無想定、或滅盡定,應如捨命識,離於身,非不離身。如世尊說:當於爾時,識不離身故」——若無阿賴耶,入滅盡定的人豈不與死人一樣?可他出定還活著,足見定中有一個微細識持身未去。到了《成唯識論》,更把這話挑明了:「故契經言不離身者,彼識即是此第八識,入滅定時不為止息,此極寂靜執持識故」。
一問一答之間,三摩呬多地完成了它的結穴:定學修到「心都滅了」的滅盡定,剩下的不是斷滅、不是死,而是那個含藏一切種、執持根身的第八識——這正是地一『眼識所依的種子依即阿賴耶識』一句,在定學最深處的兌現。一部唯識,從一念眼識的種子依起手,到滅盡定識不離身作結,首尾相銜。
出定三觸:從定裡回來,碰到三種「空」
論末講出滅盡定時「觸三種觸」——不動觸、無所有觸、無相觸,分別由緣有境、緣境境、緣滅境而起。緣有境出定時,不起「此為我」的我慢擾動,故觸「不動」;緣境境出定時,無貪瞋癡所有,故觸「無所有」;緣滅境出定時,於一切相不思惟、緣無相界,故觸「無相」。出定的這三觸,恰與前面「等持」門的空、無願、無相三三摩地相應——定到極深處出來,觸著的仍是無我、無所有、無相的那份寂靜。
「如是已說靜慮、解脫、等持、等至」——一句話,三摩呬多地的「攝諸經宗要」門到此收束。
承衍
三摩缽底子段,是攝諸經宗要門的最後一段,也是整個三摩呬多地的唯識結穴。它釋五現見(見諦人觀識流轉)、無想(觀想如病如癰如箭)、滅盡(諸心心法滅)三種等至,而把全地推到頂點的,是滅盡定「識不離身」一問——論答以「能執持轉識種子阿賴耶識不滅盡」,接通了阿含(滅盡定不捨壽煖)、解深密(阿陀那執持)、攝決擇分(八相證之處無心定)、成唯識論(不離身者即第八識)一整條唯識鏈。定學修到心法俱滅之處,照見的正是第八阿賴耶識——這與總標經據眼「心一境性即通達三摩地影像唯是其識」、與解脫子段第八解脫「棄背想受」(同此滅盡),首尾一義。三摩呬多地的門五至此畢,下一門「最後眾雜義」(門六),要收的是諸經散說的雜義,為這座定地作最後的補綴。
The Last Three of the Attainments: Present-Seeing, No-Perception, Cessation
Earlier, the gate of "Gathering the Purport of the Sūtras" set forth the liberations and the concentrations; this "attainment" (samāpatti) is its third passage. The attainments are properly of six kinds (the five of present-seeing, the eight bases-of-mastery, the ten totalities, the four formless, no-perception, and cessation); but the bases-of-mastery and the totalities were already treated above in the passage on the liberations, and the four formless attainments are no different from the liberations, so here only three are explained: present-seeing, no-perception, and cessation. And within these three, the first speaks of "contemplation" and the latter two of "cessation" — step by step the mind is gathered in to its very limit, gathered right down to where "the various minds and mental factors have one and all ceased." It is just at this limit that the question breaks out: the mind has ceased — what then remains? This one question drives the whole Stage of Meditative Equipoise up to the knot where it is tied off.
Present-Seeing: The Contemplation of One Who Has Seen the Truths — Which Shows You Even "Consciousness Turning-and-Flowing"
The five attainments of present-seeing are cultivated only by "one who has already seen the truths" (a noble one at the path of seeing or above), and so it is named "present-seeing" — a contemplation that is directly and clearly manifest, not the imagining of an ordinary being. The ancient masters make a special point of it: these five are all "attained by the noble ones alone," differing from the Lesser Vehicle's [account], which calls the first two present-seeing and holds the latter three to be merely conditionally-arisen 〔Kuiji, Concise Compendium〕. It first cultivates the contemplation of the impure (contemplating the impurity within one's own body, contemplating the aspect of the skeleton-person), and then advances to "the contemplation of the turning-and-flowing of consciousness" — and it is this contemplation that most displays the discerning eye of Consciousness-Only: one contemplates "the arising-and-ceasing and continuity of this consciousness," coarsely contemplating the continuity of "consciousness conditioned by formations" across a single span of birth-and-death, and finely contemplating how, instant by instant, consciousness "arises differently and ceases differently," so that, in the intervals of days and nights, of instants, of lavas and muhūrtas, countless consciousnesses arise and then cease, cease and then arise again (Dunlun goes on to cite the Abhidharmakośa, reckoning out these time-units one by one for you). The concentration of one who has seen the truths is not a pressing of the mind to death; it is a seeing, clear and distinct, of "how consciousness turns-and-flows" — and this has already laid a thread for what comes later, that "in the attainment of cessation the eighth consciousness still remains."
No-Perception and Cessation: Taking "Perception" as a Sickness, a Boil, an Arrow
These two, no-perception and cessation, are both concentrations in which "the various minds and mental factors cease"; but the means of entering them differ. The attainment of no-perception is entered by one "already free from craving for the Universally-Pure [heaven] but not yet free from craving above it," taking "the perception that seeks release" as prior — and the treatise uses three exceedingly sharp similes to state its means of entry: "one contemplates the perception as a sickness, as a boil, as an arrow". Taking "perception" as a sickness upon the body, as a suppurating boil, as an arrow driven in, one is averse to it, turns one's back on it, and so enters the fourth dhyāna and cultivates the attending "that turns its back on perception"; the various perceptions all being turned away in aversion, the mind comes to be stilled and ceased. These three similes are set up by the treatise itself; the ancient masters offer no separate gloss on this passage.
The attainment of cessation is a layer deeper still: it is the noble one "already free from craving for the sphere of nothingness" who, above the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, is averse to and relinquishes even that subtlest perception, so that the various minds and mental factors are brought to cessation. The treatise says that to enter the attainment of cessation there are two dharmas that "have much to do" with it — tranquillity (śamatha) and insight (vipaśyanā); and it pairs them very concretely: "the eight successive concentrations" are tranquillity, and "all the noble wisdom [there is]" is insight, and if either of the two is lacking one cannot enter the attainment of cessation. Stilling and insight, at the very deepest point of concentration, are still a pair of feet neither of which can be spared.
The Knot, and Its One Question: The Mind Has Ceased — How Can It Still Be Said That "Consciousness Does Not Depart from the Body"?
Reaching this point in the attainment of cessation, the treatise poses on our behalf the very sharpest question: "Within the attainment of cessation, the various minds and mental factors have one and all ceased — how then can it be said that consciousness does not depart from the body?" — The former six turning consciousnesses (down to mental consciousness) have all stopped, yet the sūtra insistently says "consciousness does not depart from the body." What is this "consciousness"?
The treatise's answer is exceedingly terse, exceedingly weighty: "It is because, among the unaltered, unbroken material faculties, there is the store consciousness that is able to appropriate and hold the seeds of the turning consciousnesses, and it does not cease". So then, what is stopped within the attainment of cessation is the former six (and up to the seventh) turning consciousnesses; but that eighth store consciousness — which holds in store all the seeds of the turning consciousnesses and appropriates the faculty-body — has not ceased. It is precisely because it is still appropriating that the faculty-body does not decay, and that, after emerging from the attainment, the various consciousnesses can arise again from it.
This one answer is no isolated assertion of the treatise's author; it draws behind it a complete chain of scripture and treatise. The Buddha, in the Saṃyukta-āgama, said long ago that the attainment of cessation differs from death in just this — "life is not relinquished, warmth does not depart, the faculties are unbroken" — but who is it that appropriates and holds this life, this warmth, these faculties? The Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra answers: it is the appropriating (ādāna) consciousness, which "follows along and appropriates the body," and this ādāna is none other than the store consciousness. This treatise's own later section, the Section on Ascertainment, further proves by "eight characteristics" that the store consciousness definitely exists, and the seventh of these characteristics is exactly "abiding in the mindless concentrations": "That is, one who enters the attainment of no-perception or the attainment of cessation ought, like the consciousness at the relinquishing of life, to depart from the body, [and it would be] not that it does not depart from the body. As the World-Honored One has said: at that very time, consciousness does not depart from the body" — for if there were no store consciousness, would not one who enters the attainment of cessation be no different from a corpse? Yet he emerges from the attainment still alive, which is proof enough that within the attainment there is a subtle consciousness holding the body, not yet departed. And by the time of the Cheng Weishi Lun, this saying is made fully explicit: "Therefore, as for the sūtra's saying 'it does not depart from the body' — that consciousness is just this eighth consciousness, which, when one enters the attainment of cessation, is not brought to rest, for it is this utterly stilled appropriating consciousness".
Between the one question and the one answer, the Stage of Meditative Equipoise completes the knot where it is tied off: a science of concentration cultivated down to the attainment of cessation, where "the mind itself has ceased," leaves remaining not annihilation, not death, but that eighth consciousness which holds in store all the seeds and appropriates the faculty-body — and this is precisely the line from Stage One, "the seed-support of eye-consciousness is the store consciousness," redeemed at the very deepest point of the science of concentration. A whole Consciousness-Only [teaching], setting out from the seed-support of a single moment of eye-consciousness, comes to its close at "in the attainment of cessation consciousness does not depart from the body" — head and tail joined together.
The Three Contacts on Emerging: Coming Back from the Attainment, One Meets Three Kinds of "Emptiness"
At its end the treatise speaks of the "three kinds of contact one touches" when emerging from the attainment of cessation — the contact of the unmoving, the contact of nothingness, and the contact of the markless — arising respectively by way of the existent-field, the object-field, and the ceased-field. When one emerges taking the existent-field as object, no self-conceit "this is I" stirs and disturbs one, and so one touches "the unmoving"; when one emerges taking the object-field as object, there is nothing that is craving, aversion, or delusion, and so one touches "nothingness"; when one emerges taking the ceased-field as object, one does not think upon any mark but takes the markless realm as object, and so one touches "the markless." These three contacts on emerging answer exactly to the three concentrations of the earlier "concentration" gate — emptiness, wishlessness, and marklessness: concentration cultivated to its utmost depth and then emerged from still touches upon that same stillness of no-self, of nothingness, and of the markless.
"In this way there have now been stated the dhyānas, the liberations, the concentrations, and the attainments" — with this single sentence, the gate of "Gathering the Purport of the Sūtras" within the Stage of Meditative Equipoise is drawn to a close.
Carrying Forward
The passage on the meditative attainments is the last passage of the gate of "Gathering the Purport of the Sūtras," and it is also the Consciousness-Only knot where the whole Stage of Meditative Equipoise is tied off. It explains three attainments — present-seeing (one who has seen the truths contemplating consciousness turning-and-flowing), no-perception (contemplating perception as a sickness, a boil, an arrow), and cessation (the various minds and mental factors ceasing) — and what drives the whole stage to its summit is the one question of the attainment of cessation, "consciousness does not depart from the body." The treatise answers it with "the store consciousness that is able to appropriate and hold the seeds of the turning consciousnesses does not cease," and so connects up a whole Consciousness-Only chain: the Āgama (the attainment of cessation not relinquishing life and warmth), the Saṃdhinirmocana (the ādāna appropriating [the body]), the Section on Ascertainment (the eight characteristics proving it, at the "mindless concentrations"), and the Cheng Weishi Lun ("that which does not depart from the body is the eighth consciousness"). Where the science of concentration is cultivated to the very place where mind and mental factors alike have ceased, what is illumined is precisely the eighth store consciousness — and this is of one meaning, head and tail, with the overall-heading's scriptural point-of-the-eye, "one-pointedness of mind is the penetration that the reflected image within concentration is only its own consciousness," and with the eighth liberation of the passage on the liberations, "turning one's back on perception and feeling" (identical with this cessation). The five gates of the Stage of Meditative Equipoise are herewith complete; the next gate, "the Last, of Various Miscellaneous Meanings" (Gate Six), gathers up the miscellaneous meanings scattered through the sūtras, as a final patching-in for this ground of concentration.
考據Apparatus
三摩缽底(等至)類者,攝諸經宗要門(門五)之三、亦三摩呬多地之唯識結穴:五現見(已見諦者修不淨觀・觀識流轉)・無想・滅盡三等至。其滅盡定「識不離於身」一問,論本答以「能執持轉識種子阿賴耶識不滅盡」——第八阿賴耶識於無心位之證,正接地01「種子依即阿賴耶識」、攝決擇分八相證之「處無心定」相,為一部唯識定學之收。
一、科判定位
三摩缽底類為攝諸經宗要門(門五)之三(等持類之後)。古德科判〔窺基《略纂》T43n1829 0083c25「下釋等至。上列有六,下文分四:初解五現見三摩鉢底……」〕;五現見科判分四:引經標・釋現見等至義・出總略體性・別釋行相〔窺基 0083c25;遁倫 T1828 0398b12〕。等至六(五現見・八勝處・十遍處・四無色・無想・滅盡),勝處遍處前已釋、四無色不異解脫,故此但釋五現見・無想・滅盡三。
最勝子《釋》T1580 於本門全從闕(序釋止 0888a03)。
二、異譯·經內平行對勘
- 古譯:真諦《十七地論》不及卷12,且佚——本子段無真諦異譯,從闕。
- 經內平行=攝決擇分三摩呬多地決擇(卷62–63):「滅故心不得生」之決擇〔T30n1579 0652b26「謂如有一,生無想天、入無想定、入滅盡定;於其中間經爾所時,由斷滅故,心不得生」〕——明無想/滅盡定中轉識(心)不生,正與本子段「識不離身者唯第八識」相成(轉識滅・第八不滅);又「想受滅解脫,最勝住所攝」〔0645c07〕・「滅盡定最第一住」〔0647c15〕。
- 校勘(大正原書校記全枚舉):本子段(0340b08–0341a22)大正原書校記共 6 條(
<app>校勘元素雖 0,原書校記以註記形式收錄——「校勘元素零」不等於「無校記」)。底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印);本子段無一條升定本案(無古德牒文+義理雙證支持異讀者),異讀並錄備考。真諦本佚,無異譯對勘:
| 註號 | 錨 | 底本【大】 | 異讀 | 語境 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0340002 | 0340b14 | 二 | 一【明】 | 第二不淨觀(二/一) |
| 0340003 | 0340b18 | 第 | 等【明】 | 青瘀等觀品類次第(第/等) |
| 0340004 | 0340b27 | 惟 | 唯【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 已離欲者惟住他世(惟/唯) |
| 0340005 | 0340c02 | 求 | 永【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 無想·求出離想作意(求/永) |
| 0341001 | 0341a05 | 治 | 持【明】 | 善修治其心(治/持) |
| 0340006 | 0340c13 | 〔滅盡相以下至卷末·宮本〕 | 「盡相以下至卷末等至五百五十五字宮本缺」(宮本整段缺) | 滅盡相入定以下至卷12末(宮本闕) |
附註:0340006 係宮本自「滅盡相而入於定」以下至卷末(等至結句)整段五百五十五字缺,非字異,係宮本傳本整段闕文,據實並錄。其餘 5 條為藏本字異,底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印),無升定本案。
三、聖教義之經據(眼)
本子段之眼,在滅盡定「識不離身」一問——第八阿賴耶識於無心位之證。論本答「由不變壞諸色根中,有能執持轉識種子阿賴耶識不滅盡故」〔T30n1579 0340c28–0341a03〕,其經論四層俱在藏中:
(一) 阿含經證——滅盡定不捨壽煖根(≠死)〔《雜阿含》568經 T02n0099 0150b13,求那跋陀羅譯〕:
「滅盡定者,身、口、意行滅,不捨壽命,不離於暖,諸根不壞,身命相屬,此則命終、入滅正受差別之相。」
滅盡定異於死者,正在「不捨壽・不離煖・諸根不壞」——而執持壽煖根者,即第八識(下三層釋)。
(二) 解深密·心意識相品——阿陀那(=阿賴耶)執持根身〔T16n0676 0692b15〕:
「此識亦名阿陀那識。何以故?由此識於身隨逐執持故。亦名阿賴耶識。何以故?由此識於身攝受、藏隱、同安危義故。」
阿陀那「於身隨逐執持」,正本子段「能執持轉識種子阿賴耶識」之經本(接地01種子依・總標經據眼)。
(三) 攝決擇分·八相證阿賴耶——第七「處無心定」相〔T30n1579 卷51 0579a20〕:「由八種相,證阿賴耶識決定是有……處無心定不應道理……」;其詳〔0579c13〕:
「何故若無阿賴耶識,處無心定不應道理?謂入無想定、或滅盡定,應如捨命識,離於身,非不離身。如世尊說:當於爾時,識不離身故。」
復明命終時識相,結云「故知唯有阿賴耶識能執持身」。本子段「識不離身」之問,論內攝決擇分以八相之一證之(本地「立」、決擇「證」,與地01同一論法)。
(四) 成唯識論——「不離身者即第八識」〔T31n1585〕:住滅定「身、語、心行無不皆滅,而壽不滅,亦不離煖,根無變壞,識不離身」〔0017c25〕;其結〔0018c20〕:
「故契經言不離身者,彼識即是此第八識,入滅定時不為止息,此極寂靜執持識故。無想等位,類此應知。」
滅盡定定義「令不恒行、恒行染污心、心所滅,立滅盡名……由偏厭受、想,亦名滅彼定」〔0037c14〕。本子段「識不離身→阿賴耶」之義,成唯識論直明其識即第八。
本子段之要,是把總標經據眼「心一境性=通達三摩地影像唯是其識」推到極處:連諸心心法皆滅的滅盡定,仍有第八識執持不滅——定學之底,徹是唯識。
四、諸家異釋(古德·標宗)
五現見:五皆聖得・初後不淨觀・觀識流轉(窺基・遁倫)
「現見」立名——「已見諦者修此等至,故名現見」;五皆聖得、親明了觀(不同小宗初二名現見、後三緣起所生亦名現見)〔窺基 T1829 0084a07;遁倫 T1828 0398b22〕。初二不淨觀兩番釋(所依加行緣起差別/所緣事理淺深差別)〔窺基 0084a10;遁倫 0398b25〕。觀識流轉之麁細——遁倫獨引《俱舍》釋時分〔T42n1828 0398c10「百二十剎那為怛剎那量,臘縛此六十,此三十須臾……牟呼栗多此云須臾」〕,窺基無此。觀察於斷「俱住二世/唯住他世/俱無所住」〔窺基 0084a24;遁倫 0398c13〕。
無想・滅盡:入起中有・入方便(窺基・遁倫)
無想等至「於此生中亦入亦起」「若生於彼唯入不起」,古德引《唯識》第七釋入起之心位〔窺基 T1829 0084a28;遁倫 0398c19〕。滅盡定「已離無所有欲」「依非想處相/滅盡相入定」之久修任運〔窺基 0084b10;遁倫 0399a01〕。
論本自立、古德此段從闕者:無想「觀想如病如癰如箭・修背想作意」、滅盡「八次第定=奢摩他・聖慧=毘鉢舍那」——皆論本語,窺基遁倫此段未釋。「識不離身→阿賴耶」之答,古德此段亦從闕(窺基略纂卷五・遁倫論記卷四之下俱止於出定三觸結語,論本卷12/13 之交方有此答);二師之「識不離身」量破釋在抉擇分滅心定段(窺基 T1829 0172・遁倫 T1828 0595c),屬別處對小宗之論諍,可互讀而非本段之釋——本段「識不離身」之唯識義,依攝決擇分八相證及成唯識論(目三)。
次第滅三行・出定三觸(窺基・遁倫·變體)
次第滅三行(行時/住時・逆次第起)〔窺基 T1829 0084b16;遁倫 0399a13〕。出定三觸(不動/無所有/無相觸,緣有境/境境/滅境),遁倫並引《正理》卷十二・《摩訶俱稀羅經》・三師釋〔T42n1828 0399a23–0399c04〕——唯徵引存異,窺基唯配空/無願/無相等持〔T1829 0084b24〕。
古德傳本異寫(兩讀並錄):滅三種行之「二定滅某行」,窺基《略纂》作「二定滅語行」〔T1829 0084b20〕、遁倫《論記》大正本作「二定滅識行」〔T1828 0399a18〕;又「俱住二世」窺基作「有縛」、遁倫作「有轉」;出定三觸「內三有體名有境(窺基)/名境(遁倫)」。此係古德二疏傳本字異,論本正字依大正底本,異本兩讀並錄備考。
五、術語
| 漢 | 古德傳梵(羅馬字·發音輔助) | 精確義 |
|---|---|---|
| 三摩缽底(等至) | samāpatti | 有心無心諸定位所有定體;此釋五現見・無想・滅盡 |
| 五現見三摩缽底 | pañca abhijñā?/darśana | 已見諦者修·不淨觀·觀識流轉(五皆聖得) |
| 無想三摩缽底 | asaṃjñi-samāpatti | 離遍淨欲·求出離想·觀想如病如癰如箭 |
| 滅盡(想受滅)三摩缽底 | nirodha-samāpatti | 離無所有處欲·諸心心法滅·識不離身(第八識執持) |
| 阿賴耶識 | ālaya-vijñāna | 能執持轉識種子·滅盡定中不滅(接地01種子依) |
| 牟呼栗多 | muhūrta | 須臾(時分·遁倫引俱舍:三十臘縛為一) |
本子段古德傳梵音寫少出;牟呼栗多・臘縛・怛剎那等時分梵音繫古德(遁倫引俱舍 0398c10);標「—」或「?」者表示古德所傳音寫從闕,不據現代校本擬補。
六、譬喻·修辭
(一) 如病・如癰・如箭(無想·觀想過患)〔T30n1579 0340c03〕「觀想如病、如癰、如箭,入第四靜慮,修背想作意」:以三喻顯「想」之過患(如病之苦、如癰之穢、如箭之傷),為入無想之厭背所緣。
(二) 如捨命識離身(攝決擇·處無心定喻)〔T30n1579 0579c14〕「應如捨命識,離於身,非不離身」:以「死時識離身」反顯——若無阿賴耶,則入滅定者應同死人;今入滅定者識仍不離身,故知有阿賴耶執持。
「識不離身」一段論本以問答顯義,喻具主在攝決擇分(目三·三)。
七、互讀
本子段為三摩呬多地之唯識結穴,上承經(阿含滅盡定・解深密阿陀那)、論內攝決擇(八相證)、後衍唯識(成唯識論第八識):
- 《雜阿含》568〔T02n0099 0150b13〕:滅盡定不捨壽煖根(≠死)——本段「識不離身」之阿含經源。
- 解深密·心意識相品〔T16n0676 0692b15〕:阿陀那執持根身——本段阿賴耶執持之經本。
- 攝決擇分(卷51)八相證〔T30n1579 0579a20・0579c13〕:處無心定・命終時識——本段「識不離身」之論內證(地01種子依→此八相證,首尾相銜)。
- 成唯識論〔T31n1585 0017c25・0018c20・0037c14〕:住滅定識不離身即第八識・滅盡定定義——本段第八識義之論承。
- 本地分內:三摩缽底上承等持子段(攝諸經宗要)、與解脫子段第八解脫「想受滅」相銜(同滅盡);下啟雜義門(門六)。
八、校本定位
- 玄奘 T1579 本地分三摩呬多地·攝諸經宗要·三摩缽底(底本):〔T30n1579 0340b08〕「復次,云何五現見三摩鉢底」起—〔0341a22〕「如是已說靜慮、解脫、等持、等至」訖(五現見 0340b08・無想 0340c01・滅盡 0340c08・識不離身 0340c28・出定三觸 0341a)。本子段末「如是已說靜慮、解脫、等持、等至」即門五結句、卷12 末(卷12/13 界=門五/門六界)。
- 窺基略纂 T1829:五現見〔0083c25〕・無想入起〔0084a28〕・滅盡入方便〔0084b10〕・次第滅三行〔0084b16〕・出定三觸〔0084b24〕。
- 遁倫論記 T1828:五現見〔0398b12〕・時分引俱舍〔0398c10〕・無想〔0398c19〕・滅盡〔0399a01〕・次第滅三行〔0399a13〕・出定三觸引正理俱稀羅三師〔0399a23〕。
- 最勝子 T1580:本門全從闕(序釋止 0888a03)。
- 《雜阿含》T0099:滅盡定≠死〔568經 0150b13〕。《中阿含》T0026:想知滅定〔分別聖諦 0449c09・鄔陀夷〕。
- 解深密 T676:阿陀那執持〔心意識相品 0692b15〕。攝決擇分(卷51):八相證・處無心定〔0579a20・0579c13〕。成唯識論 T1585:識不離身即第八識〔0018c20〕・住滅定〔0017c25〕・滅盡定定義〔0037c14〕。
- 校勘:本子段(0340b08–0341a22)大正原書校記 6 條全枚舉(目二·正文錨全定位·底本從 CBETA 承字·無升定本案,含宮本整段闕文一條 0340006),見目二;真諦本佚,無異譯對勘;古德二疏傳本字異(二定滅語/識行・縛/轉・有境/境)見目四,正字依大正底本,兩讀並錄。
The meditative-attainment (samāpatti) class is the third of the gate "Gathering the Purport of the Sūtras" (Gate Five), and also the Consciousness-Only knot where the Stage of Meditative Equipoise is tied off: the three attainments of present-seeing (one who has seen the truths cultivating the contemplation of the impure · the contemplation of the turning-and-flowing of consciousness), no-perception, and cessation. Its attainment-of-cessation question, "consciousness does not depart from the body," the treatise answers with "the store consciousness that is able to appropriate and hold the seeds of the turning consciousnesses does not cease" — the eighth store consciousness proved at the mindless phase, joining exactly to Stage 01's "the seed-support is the store consciousness" and to the Section on Ascertainment's eight-characteristic proof at "the mindless concentrations," and drawing to a close a whole Consciousness-Only science of concentration.
I. Doctrinal-Outline Placement
The meditative-attainment class is the third of the gate "Gathering the Purport of the Sūtras" (Gate Five), following the concentration class. The ancient masters' outline 〔Kuiji, Concise Compendium T43n1829 0083c25「下釋等至。上列有六,下文分四:初解五現見三摩鉢底……」 tr. "Below, the attainments are explained. Six were listed above; the text below divides into four: first, an explanation of the five attainments of present-seeing…"〕; the outline of present-seeing divides into four — citing the sūtra and setting up the theme · explaining the sense of the attainment of present-seeing · setting out the overall-and-brief intrinsic nature · explaining the modes of activity severally 〔Kuiji 0083c25; Dunlun T1828 0398b12〕. Of the six attainments (the five of present-seeing · the eight bases-of-mastery · the ten totalities · the four formless · no-perception · cessation), the bases-of-mastery and the totalities were already explained above, and the four formless are no different from the liberations, so here only three are explained: present-seeing, no-perception, and cessation.
Jinaputra's Commentary T1580 is absent throughout this gate (its prefatory exposition stops at 0888a03).
II. Alternate Translations · Collation of In-Treatise Parallels
- Old translation: Paramārtha's Treatise on the Seventeen Stages (十七地論) does not reach fascicle 12, and is moreover lost — this sub-passage has no Paramārtha alternate translation; omitted here.
- In-treatise parallel = the ascertainment of the Stage of Meditative Equipoise in the Section on Ascertainment (fasc. 62–63): the ascertainment of "because of ceasing, the mind does not come to arise" 〔T30n1579 0652b26「謂如有一,生無想天、入無想定、入滅盡定;於其中間經爾所時,由斷滅故,心不得生」 tr. "That is, suppose someone is born in the heaven of no-perception, or enters the attainment of no-perception, or enters the attainment of cessation; throughout that stretch of time, because of severance-and-ceasing, the mind does not come to arise"〕 — showing that within the attainments of no-perception and cessation the turning consciousnesses (the mind) do not arise, in exact complement with this sub-passage's "that which does not depart from the body is only the eighth consciousness" (the turning consciousnesses cease · the eighth does not cease); also「想受滅解脫,最勝住所攝」 tr. "the liberation of the cessation of perception-and-feeling is subsumed under the most excellent abiding" 〔0645c07〕 ·「滅盡定最第一住」 tr. "the attainment of cessation is the very foremost abiding" 〔0647c15〕.
- Collation (full enumeration of the Taishō base text's collation notes): this sub-passage (0340b08–0341a22) carries in all 6 collation notes in the Taishō base text (although the
<app>collation elements number zero, the base text's collation notes are recorded in note form — "zero collation elements" does not equal "no collation notes"). The base text follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); not a single note in this sub-passage rises to a critical-edition emendation (none has both an ancient-master lemma citation and doctrinal support for the variant); variants are recorded alongside for the record. Paramārtha's edition is lost, so there is no alternate translation to collate against:
| Note # | Anchor | Base 【大 Taishō】 | Variant | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0340002 | 0340b14 | 二 | 一【明】 | The second contemplation of the impure ("second" / "first") |
| 0340003 | 0340b18 | 第 | 等【明】 | The categorical sequence of the contemplation of the livid-bruised and the rest ("sequence" 第 / 等) |
| 0340004 | 0340b27 | 惟 | 唯【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | "one already freed from craving abides only in the other time" (惟 / 唯) |
| 0340005 | 0340c02 | 求 | 永【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | No-perception · the attending "with the perception that seeks release" (求 / 永) |
| 0341001 | 0341a05 | 治 | 持【明】 | "well cultivating-and-purifying one's mind" (治 / 持) |
| 0340006 | 0340c13 | 〔滅盡相以下至卷末·宮本〕 | 「盡相以下至卷末等至五百五十五字宮本缺」(宮本整段缺) | From "the aspect of cessation" downward to the end of the fascicle · the Palace edition (整段缺 — the whole passage is absent) |
Note: note 0340006 is the Palace edition's absence, as an entire block, of the five hundred and fifty-five characters from 「滅盡相而入於定」 tr. "in dependence on the aspect of cessation, enters concentration" downward to the end of fascicle 12 (the attainments' closing sentence); it is not a character-variant but a whole-block lacuna in the Palace transmission, recorded here as it stands. The other 5 notes are canon-edition character-variants; the base text follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); none rises to a critical-edition emendation.
III. Scriptural Grounds for the Consciousness-Only Meaning (the Point of the Eye)
The point of the eye of this sub-passage lies in the attainment-of-cessation question, "consciousness does not depart from the body" — the proof of the eighth store consciousness at the mindless phase. The treatise answers 「由不變壞諸色根中,有能執持轉識種子阿賴耶識不滅盡故」 tr. "it is because, among the unaltered, unbroken material faculties, there is the store consciousness that is able to appropriate and hold the seeds of the turning consciousnesses, and it does not cease" 〔T30n1579 0340c28–0341a03〕; and its four layers of scripture-and-treatise are all present in the canon:
(1) The Āgama grounds — the attainment of cessation does not relinquish life, warmth, or the faculties (≠ death) 〔Saṃyukta-āgama sūtra 568, T02n0099 0150b13, translated by Guṇabhadra〕:
「滅盡定者,身、口、意行滅,不捨壽命,不離於暖,諸根不壞,身命相屬,此則命終、入滅正受差別之相。」
tr. "As for the attainment of cessation: the formations of body, speech, and mind cease; yet life is not relinquished, warmth does not depart, the faculties are unbroken, and body and life still cohere — this is the mark distinguishing the end of life from the entering into the equipoise of cessation." What makes the attainment of cessation differ from death is precisely "not relinquishing life · not departing from warmth · the faculties unbroken" — and that which appropriates and holds this life, warmth, and faculties is the eighth consciousness (explained in the three layers below).
(2) The Saṃdhinirmocana · Chapter on the Marks of Mind, Mentation, and Consciousness — the ādāna (= ālaya) appropriates the faculty-body 〔T16n0676 0692b15〕:
「此識亦名阿陀那識。何以故?由此識於身隨逐執持故。亦名阿賴耶識。何以故?由此識於身攝受、藏隱、同安危義故。」
tr. "This consciousness is also named the ādāna (appropriating) consciousness. Why? Because this consciousness follows along the body and appropriates it. It is also named the ālaya (store) consciousness. Why? Because this consciousness, with respect to the body, takes it up, conceals it within, and shares one lot of safety-and-peril with it." The ādāna "follows along the body and appropriates it" is exactly the scriptural source of this sub-passage's "the store consciousness that is able to appropriate and hold the seeds of the turning consciousnesses" (joining to Stage 01's seed-support · the overall-heading's scriptural point-of-the-eye).
(3) The Section on Ascertainment · the eight-characteristic proof of the ālaya — the seventh characteristic, "abiding in the mindless concentrations" 〔T30n1579 fasc. 51 0579a20〕:「由八種相,證阿賴耶識決定是有……處無心定不應道理……」 tr. "by eight characteristics, [it is] proved that the store consciousness definitely exists … [without it] abiding in the mindless concentrations would not stand to reason …"; in detail 〔0579c13〕:
「何故若無阿賴耶識,處無心定不應道理?謂入無想定、或滅盡定,應如捨命識,離於身,非不離身。如世尊說:當於爾時,識不離身故。」
tr. "Why, if there were no store consciousness, would abiding in the mindless concentrations not stand to reason? That is: one who enters the attainment of no-perception or the attainment of cessation ought, like the consciousness at the relinquishing of life, to depart from the body, [and it would be] not that it does not depart from the body. As the World-Honored One has said: at that very time, consciousness does not depart from the body." It further clarifies the mark of consciousness at the end of life, concluding「故知唯有阿賴耶識能執持身」 tr. "therefore it is known that it is the store consciousness alone that is able to appropriate and hold the body." This sub-passage's question "consciousness does not depart from the body" is, within the treatise, proved by the Section on Ascertainment by one of the eight characteristics (the Basic Section "states," the Ascertainment "proves" — the same treatise-method as at Stage 01).
(4) The Cheng Weishi Lun — "that which does not depart from the body is the eighth consciousness" 〔T31n1585〕: abiding in the attainment of cessation,「身、語、心行無不皆滅,而壽不滅,亦不離煖,根無變壞,識不離身」 tr. "there is nothing among the formations of body, speech, and mind that does not entirely cease; yet life does not cease, warmth too does not depart, the faculties suffer no alteration-or-breaking, and consciousness does not depart from the body" 〔0017c25〕; its conclusion 〔0018c20〕:
「故契經言不離身者,彼識即是此第八識,入滅定時不為止息,此極寂靜執持識故。無想等位,類此應知。」
tr. "Therefore, as for the sūtra's saying 'it does not depart from the body' — that consciousness is just this eighth consciousness, which, when one enters the attainment of cessation, is not brought to rest, for it is this utterly stilled appropriating consciousness. The phase of no-perception and the like should be understood after this pattern." The definition of the attainment of cessation:「令不恒行、恒行染污心、心所滅,立滅盡名……由偏厭受、想,亦名滅彼定」 tr. "bringing to cessation the non-constantly-operating [minds] and the constantly-operating defiled mind and mental factors, one establishes the name 'cessation' … because it is one-sidedly averse to feeling and perception, it is also named the concentration that ceases those [two]" 〔0037c14〕. This sub-passage's sense of "consciousness does not depart from the body → the ālaya" the Cheng Weishi Lun makes plain outright: that consciousness is the eighth.
The essential point of this sub-passage is to drive the overall-heading's scriptural point-of-the-eye, "one-pointedness of mind = the penetration that the reflected image within concentration is only its own consciousness," to its very limit: even in the attainment of cessation, where the various minds and mental factors all cease, there is still the eighth consciousness appropriating-and-holding without ceasing — the floor of the science of concentration is, through and through, Consciousness-Only.
IV. The Explanations of the Various Masters (the Ancients · Setting the Theme)
Present-Seeing: All Five Attained by the Noble Ones Alone · The First and Latter Contemplations of the Impure · The Contemplation of the Turning-and-Flowing of Consciousness (Kuiji · Dunlun)
The naming of "present-seeing" —「已見諦者修此等至,故名現見」 tr. "it is one who has already seen the truths who cultivates this attainment, and so it is named present-seeing"; all five are attained by the noble ones alone, a directly-clear contemplation (differing from the Lesser Vehicle, which names the first two present-seeing and holds the latter three, being conditionally-arisen, to be present-seeing too) 〔Kuiji T1829 0084a07; Dunlun T1828 0398b22〕. The first two contemplations of the impure have a twofold gloss (a distinction of support · preparatory effort · conditioned-arising / a distinction of object · principle-and-fact · shallow-and-deep) 〔Kuiji 0084a10; Dunlun 0398b25〕. On the coarse-and-fine of the contemplation of the turning-and-flowing of consciousness — Dunlun alone cites the Abhidharmakośa to explain the time-units 〔T42n1828 0398c10「百二十剎那為怛剎那量,臘縛此六十,此三十須臾……牟呼栗多此云須臾」 tr. "one hundred and twenty instants make the measure of a tatkṣaṇa; sixty of these make a lava; thirty of these make a muhūrta … muhūrta, here rendered 'a moment'"〕, which Kuiji does not have. The contemplation directed at severance —「俱住二世/唯住他世/俱無所住」 tr. "abiding in two times together / abiding only in the other time / abiding in neither" 〔Kuiji 0084a24; Dunlun 0398c13〕.
No-Perception · Cessation: Entering-and-Emerging in the Intermediate Existence · The Means of Entry (Kuiji · Dunlun)
The attainment of no-perception —「於此生中亦入亦起」「若生於彼唯入不起」 tr. "within this present life one both enters and emerges" · "if one is born there, one only enters and does not emerge"; the ancient masters cite the Vijñaptimātratā (fasc. 7) to explain the mind-phase of entering-and-emerging 〔Kuiji T1829 0084a28; Dunlun 0398c19〕. The attainment of cessation —「已離無所有欲」「依非想處相/滅盡相入定」 tr. "already free from craving for [the sphere of] nothingness" · "entering concentration in dependence on the aspect of the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception / the aspect of cessation" — and its effortlessness after long cultivation 〔Kuiji 0084b10; Dunlun 0399a01〕.
Set up by the treatise itself · absent from the ancient masters at this passage: no-perception's「觀想如病如癰如箭・修背想作意」 tr. "contemplating perception as a sickness, a boil, an arrow · cultivating the attending that turns its back on perception," and cessation's「八次第定=奢摩他・聖慧=毘鉢舍那」 tr. "the eight successive concentrations = tranquillity · the noble wisdom = insight" — both are the treatise's own words, on which Kuiji and Dunlun offer no gloss at this passage. The answer "consciousness does not depart from the body → the ālaya" is likewise absent from the ancient masters at this passage (Kuiji's Concise Compendium fascicle 5 and Dunlun's Notes the latter part of fascicle 4 both stop at the closing words on the three contacts of emerging; this answer comes only at the juncture of the treatise's fascicles 12/13); the two masters' reasoned refutation of the Lesser Vehicle over "consciousness does not depart from the body" is at the ascertainment-section passage on the mind-ceasing concentration (Kuiji T1829 0172 · Dunlun T1828 0595c), belonging to a separate-place debate against the Lesser Vehicle, which may be cross-read but is not a gloss on this passage — the Consciousness-Only meaning of this passage's "consciousness does not depart from the body" rests on the Section on Ascertainment's eight-characteristic proof and the Cheng Weishi Lun (Heading III).
The Sequential Ceasing of the Three Formations · The Three Contacts of Emerging (Kuiji · Dunlun · variants)
The sequential ceasing of the three formations (at the time of moving-about / the time of abiding · arising in the reverse sequence) 〔Kuiji T1829 0084b16; Dunlun 0399a13〕. The three contacts of emerging (the unmoving / nothingness / the markless, by way of the existent-field / the object-field / the ceased-field) — Dunlun in addition cites the Nyāyānusāra fasc. 12 · the Mahākauṣṭhila-sūtra · and three masters' glosses 〔T42n1828 0399a23–0399c04〕 — a citation-only recording of the divergences; Kuiji only matches [the three contacts] with the emptiness / wishlessness / markless concentrations 〔T1829 0084b24〕.
Ancient-transmission variant readings (two readings recorded alongside): for "the second concentration ceases such-and-such formation" in the sequential ceasing of the three formations, Kuiji's Concise Compendium reads "the second concentration ceases the formation of speech" 〔T1829 0084b20〕, while Dunlun's Notes in the Taishō edition reads "the second concentration ceases the formation of consciousness" 〔T1828 0399a18〕; again, for "abiding in two times together" Kuiji reads "there is binding," Dunlun "there is turning"; for the three contacts of emerging, "the inner-three-having-substance is named the existent-field (Kuiji) / named the field (Dunlun)." These are character-variants in the transmissions of the two ancient-master commentaries; the correct characters of the treatise follow the Taishō base text, and the variant readings are recorded alongside for the record.
V. Terminology
| 漢 | Ancient-transmitted Sanskrit (romanization · pronunciation aid) | Precise sense |
|---|---|---|
| 三摩缽底(等至) | samāpatti | The concentration-substance of the various concentration-phases, with mind and mindless; here explaining present-seeing · no-perception · cessation |
| 五現見三摩缽底 | pañca abhijñā?/darśana | Cultivated by one who has already seen the truths · the contemplation of the impure · the contemplation of the turning-and-flowing of consciousness (all five attained by the noble ones alone) |
| 無想三摩缽底 | asaṃjñi-samāpatti | Free from craving for the Universally-Pure [heaven] · the perception that seeks release · contemplating perception as a sickness, a boil, an arrow |
| 滅盡(想受滅)三摩缽底 | nirodha-samāpatti | Free from craving for the sphere of nothingness · the various minds and mental factors cease · consciousness does not depart from the body (the eighth consciousness appropriating-and-holding) |
| 阿賴耶識 | ālaya-vijñāna | Able to appropriate and hold the seeds of the turning consciousnesses · not ceasing within the attainment of cessation (joining to Stage 01's seed-support) |
| 牟呼栗多 | muhūrta | A moment (a time-unit · Dunlun cites the Abhidharmakośa: thirty lavas make one) |
Ancient-transmitted Sanskrit transliterations are few for this sub-passage; the time-units muhūrta, lava, tatkṣaṇa, and the like are anchored to the ancient masters (Dunlun cites the Abhidharmakośa 0398c10); entries marked "—" or "?" lack an attestable ancient-master transliteration and are not reconstructed from modern critical editions.
VI. Similes · Rhetoric
(1) As a sickness · as a boil · as an arrow (no-perception · contemplating the fault [of perception]) 〔T30n1579 0340c03〕「觀想如病、如癰、如箭,入第四靜慮,修背想作意」 tr. "one contemplates perception as a sickness, as a boil, as an arrow, enters the fourth dhyāna, and cultivates the attending that turns its back on perception": three similes display the fault of "perception" (like the suffering of a sickness, like the foulness of a boil, like the wounding of an arrow), as the object turned-away-from-in-aversion for entering no-perception.
(2) Like the consciousness that departs the body at the relinquishing of life (the Section on Ascertainment · the mindless-concentrations simile) 〔T30n1579 0579c14〕「應如捨命識,離於身,非不離身」 tr. "[it] ought, like the consciousness at the relinquishing of life, to depart from the body, [and it would be] not that it does not depart from the body": by "at death, consciousness departs from the body" it shows by contrast — if there were no store consciousness, then one who enters the attainment of cessation ought to be the same as a dead man; yet one who enters the attainment of cessation, his consciousness still not departing from the body, [shows that] it is therefore known there is a store consciousness appropriating-and-holding.
The "consciousness does not depart from the body" passage the treatise displays by question-and-answer; the simile that furnishes it is principally in the Section on Ascertainment (Heading III · (3)).
VII. Cross-Reading
This sub-passage is the Consciousness-Only knot where the Stage of Meditative Equipoise is tied off; above it inherits scripture (the Āgama's attainment of cessation · the Saṃdhinirmocana's ādāna), within the treatise the ascertainment (the eight-characteristic proof), and from there it is carried forward by Consciousness-Only [thought] (the Cheng Weishi Lun's eighth consciousness):
- the Saṃyukta-āgama sūtra 568 〔T02n0099 0150b13〕: the attainment of cessation not relinquishing life, warmth, or the faculties (≠ death) — the Āgama scriptural source of this passage's "consciousness does not depart from the body."
- the Saṃdhinirmocana · Chapter on the Marks of Mind, Mentation, and Consciousness 〔T16n0676 0692b15〕: the ādāna appropriating the faculty-body — the scriptural source of this passage's ālaya appropriating-and-holding.
- the Section on Ascertainment (fasc. 51) · the eight-characteristic proof 〔T30n1579 0579a20 · 0579c13〕: the mindless concentrations · consciousness at the end of life — the in-treatise proof of this passage's "consciousness does not depart from the body" (Stage 01's seed-support → this eight-characteristic proof, head and tail joined together).
- the Cheng Weishi Lun 〔T31n1585 0017c25 · 0018c20 · 0037c14〕: abiding in the attainment of cessation, consciousness not departing from the body is the eighth consciousness · the definition of the attainment of cessation — the treatise-inheritance of this passage's eighth-consciousness meaning.
- within the Basic Section: the meditative attainments above inherit the concentration sub-passage (Gathering the Purport of the Sūtras), and join with the eighth liberation of the passage on the liberations, "the cessation of perception-and-feeling" (identical with this cessation); below they open the way to the miscellaneous-meanings gate (Gate Six).
Cross-readings use stable canon and fascicle citations.
VIII. Placement of the Critical Editions
- Xuanzang T1579 Basic Section · The Stage of Meditative Equipoise · Gathering the Purport of the Sūtras · the Meditative Attainments (base text): from 〔T30n1579 0340b08〕「復次,云何五現見三摩鉢底」 tr. "Further, what is the fivefold attainment of present-seeing" to 〔0341a22〕「如是已說靜慮、解脫、等持、等至」 tr. "in this way there have now been stated the dhyānas, the liberations, the concentrations, and the attainments" (present-seeing 0340b08 · no-perception 0340c01 · cessation 0340c08 · consciousness not departing from the body 0340c28 · the three contacts of emerging 0341a). This sub-passage's closing sentence「如是已說靜慮、解脫、等持、等至」 is the closing sentence of Gate Five and the end of fascicle 12 (the fascicle 12 / 13 boundary = the Gate Five / Gate Six boundary).
- Kuiji, Concise Compendium T1829: present-seeing 〔0083c25〕 · no-perception entering-and-emerging 〔0084a28〕 · cessation, the means of entry 〔0084b10〕 · the sequential ceasing of the three formations 〔0084b16〕 · the three contacts of emerging 〔0084b24〕.
- Dunlun, Notes T1828: present-seeing 〔0398b12〕 · the time-units, citing the Abhidharmakośa 〔0398c10〕 · no-perception 〔0398c19〕 · cessation 〔0399a01〕 · the sequential ceasing of the three formations 〔0399a13〕 · the three contacts of emerging, citing the Nyāyānusāra, the Kauṣṭhila [sūtra], and three masters 〔0399a23〕.
- Jinaputra T1580: absent throughout this gate (its prefatory exposition stops at 0888a03).
- the Saṃyukta-āgama T0099: the attainment of cessation ≠ death 〔sūtra 568 0150b13〕. the Madhyama-āgama T0026: the concentration of the cessation of perception-and-cognition 〔the Analysis of the Noble Truths 0449c09 · Udāyin〕.
- the Saṃdhinirmocana T676: the ādāna appropriating-and-holding 〔Chapter on the Marks of Mind, Mentation, and Consciousness 0692b15〕. the Section on Ascertainment (fasc. 51): the eight-characteristic proof · the mindless concentrations 〔0579a20 · 0579c13〕. the Cheng Weishi Lun T1585: consciousness not departing from the body is the eighth consciousness 〔0018c20〕 · abiding in the attainment of cessation 〔0017c25〕 · the definition of the attainment of cessation 〔0037c14〕.
- Collation: this sub-passage (0340b08–0341a22) carries 6 collation notes in the Taishō base text, fully enumerated (Heading II · the body-text anchors all located · the base follows the CBETA character-readings · no note rises to a critical-edition emendation, including the one whole-block Palace-edition lacuna, note 0340006), see Heading II; Paramārtha's edition is lost, so there is no alternate translation to collate against; the ancient-master commentaries have transmission character-variants (the second concentration ceasing the formation of speech / consciousness · binding / turning · existent-field / field), see Heading IV, the correct characters following the Taishō base text, both readings recorded alongside.