瑜伽師地論 聲聞地 · 第三瑜伽處 · 止觀自性 · 九種心住
安立既成,本葉正式修定。眼:聲聞止觀的所緣影像,《解深密經》判為唯識所現——此葉義眼重(與安立段眼·輕相對)。
一句話:心一境性(數數隨念同分所緣·流注·無罪適悅)開為止觀二品——奢摩他品有九種心住(內住→等住→安住→近住→調順→寂靜→最極寂靜→專注一趣→等持,從使勁到任運)·六種力·四種作意;毘鉢舍那品有四種毘鉢舍那(能正思擇盡所有性·最極思擇如所有性·周遍尋思·周遍伺察)·三門·六事差別所緣(義事相品時理+三覺),遍施五停心(不淨·慈愍·緣起·界差別·數息);末以止觀雙運結。
三個眼目
-
九住心=止之全程圖(從使勁到任運)·六力配·四作意通止觀:九住一線——內住(硬拉收心)→等住(挫細)→安住(失念再收)→近住(數數內住)→調順(取五相過患)→寂靜(止惡尋思隨煩惱)→最極寂靜(暫起即斷滅除遣變吐)→專注一趣(無間相續)→等持(無功用任運)〔T30 0450c18〕。六力成辦(聽聞思惟→內等住·憶念→安近住·正知→調順寂靜·精進→最極專注·串習→等持〔遁倫 T42 0463b·窺基 T43 0118c〕);四作意用心由緊到鬆(力勵→有間缺→無間缺→無功用),通止觀二品〔遁倫 T42 0463b〕。古德於九住唯揀等住/遍住/澄淨/最寂淨數名釋·餘準論文;窺基「九住未必定中心,但住一緣即是」〔T43 0118c〕。
-
四毘鉢舍那·六事·三覺(觀之格式)+五停心五帖藥:觀依止奢摩他起四慧行(思擇盡所有性/如所有性·尋思伺察);三門(唯隨相→隨尋思→隨伺察)·六事(義事相品時理·理含觀待作用證成法爾四道理·證成下至教比度現證三量);六事依三覺建立(尋思義→語義覺·事及自相→事邊際覺·共相品時理→如實覺,本論自說〔T30 0452a〕)。六事遍施五淨行=五停心五帖藥:不淨治貪(九變壞相:青瘀→膿爛→爛壞胮脹→食噉→異赤→分散→骨→鎖→骨鎖〔T30 0451c〕)·慈愍治瞋(親怨中庸·平等性心·怨親無定)·緣起治癡(十二支·二因〔牽引/生起〕二果〔自體/受用境界〕)·界差別治慢(六界假名為身)·數息治尋思(入出息長短遍身·無常)。
-
★所緣影像唯是識(義眼·重·《解深密·分別瑜伽品》):修觀所緣之定中影像,經判「我說識所緣,唯識所現故」+鏡喻「如依善瑩清淨鏡面,以質為緣還見本質」〔解深密 T16 0698b〕;心一境性即「通達三摩地所行影像唯是其識(盡所有性層)→復思惟如性(如所有性層)」〔T16 0698b22〕。聲聞止觀之所緣影像,經自判為唯識所現——聲聞止觀通唯識義之經內樞紐(據《解深密》經本·佛說玄奘譯·非現代之說)。
附註:止觀雙運(奢摩他依止→毘鉢舍那清淨·毘鉢舍那依止→奢摩他增長〔T30 0455b〕);善巧所緣·淨惑所緣亦走六事·論明「於其自處我後當說」指後(攝決擇/後分);九種心住為後出慈氏無著諸論(莊嚴經論 T31n1604·攝論系)「九種心住」之所本(承衍·穩定徵引)。古德二態:遁倫《論記》卷七之下〔T42 0462c28 起·六力/四作意/三覺/不淨/緣起/界/數息逐釋·引泰/基/備/三藏〕;窺基《略纂》卷八·論本卷30〔T43 0118b04 起·九住通定散/六力/法爾三法性/不淨〕;最勝子無逐句專釋〔T30 0884a24 唯一語〕。慈愍觀古德略(遁倫「如文可知」0464b01·窺基卷30 無)。義理開講見〈義疏〉。
The establishing done, this leaf takes up the cultivation of meditation in earnest. The point of the eye: the object-image that śrāvaka tranquillity-and-insight rests upon is judged by the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra to be nothing but the appearance of consciousness — so on this leaf the doctrinal eye is heavy (in contrast to the establishing passage, whose eye is light).
In one line: One-pointedness of mind (repeatedly recollecting an object of the same class · flowing on · consorting with a blameless ease) opens into the two divisions of tranquillity and insight — the tranquillity (śamatha) division has the nine mental abidings (inner abiding → even abiding → settled abiding → close abiding → tamed → stilled → utterly stilled → single-pointed absorption → holding-in-equipoise, from strain to spontaneity) · the six forces · the four attentions; the insight (vipaśyanā) division has the four insights (correctly discerning the extent-of-being · utterly discerning the way-of-being · thorough investigation · thorough examination) · the three gateways · the object-differentiated-by-six-matters (meaning · thing · mark · class · time · principle, together with the three cognitions), applied all through the five stilling contemplations (the impure · loving-kindness · dependent origination · the differentiation of elements · mindfulness of breathing); it closes with the joined operation of tranquillity and insight.
Three Points of the Eye
-
The nine abidings = the full itinerary of tranquillity (from strain to spontaneity) · matched with the six forces · the four attentions run through both tranquillity and insight: the nine abidings form one line — inner abiding (hauling the mind in) → even abiding (grinding it fine) → settled abiding (losing mindfulness, gathering it back) → close abiding (repeatedly abiding within) → tamed (taking the five marks as fault) → stilled (stilling evil thought and secondary afflictions) → utterly stilled (severing, expelling, vomiting out whatever momentarily rises) → single-pointed absorption (unbroken continuity) → holding-in-equipoise (spontaneous, effortless) 〔T30 0450c18〕. The six forces accomplish them (hearing and reflection → inner and even abiding · recollection → settled and close abiding · full awareness → tamed and stilled · vigor → utterly stilled and single-pointed absorption · repeated practice → holding-in-equipoise 〔Dunlun T42 0463b · Kuiji T43 0118c〕); the four attentions run the effort from tight to loose (striving-operation → interrupted-operation → uninterrupted-operation → effortless-operation), and pertain to both the tranquillity and insight divisions 〔Dunlun T42 0463b〕. Of the nine abidings the ancients gloss only a few names — even abiding / all-round abiding / clarifying / utterly stilled — the rest following the treatise's own statement; Kuiji cautions that these nine abidings "are not necessarily the mind within meditative equipoise, but abiding upon a single object is just this" 〔T43 0118c〕.
-
The four insights · the six matters · the three cognitions (the format of insight) + the five stilling contemplations, five remedies: insight rests upon tranquillity and gives rise to four wisdom-practices (discerning the extent-of-being / the way-of-being · investigating and examining); the three gateways (following-the-mark-only → following-investigation → following-examination) · the six matters (meaning · thing · mark · class · time · principle — principle contains the four principles of reliance, function, proof, and the nature of things, and under proof the three means: authoritative teaching, inference, direct realization); the six matters are established upon the three cognitions (discerning meaning → the cognition of word-meaning · thing and particular-mark → the cognition of the bounds of the thing · common-mark, class, time, principle → the cognition of things-as-they-are; the treatise says so itself 〔T30 0452a〕). The six matters applied through the five stilling contemplations = five remedies: the impure remedies desire (nine marks of decay: bruised-blue → festering → rotted-and-bloated → devoured → the discolored-red → scattered → bone → chain → bone-chain 〔T30 0451c〕) · loving-kindness remedies hatred (friend, foe, and neutral · a mind of evenness · foe and friend are not fixed) · dependent origination remedies delusion (the twelve members · two causes 〔the drawing-in / the giving-rise〕, two fruits 〔the self-body / the enjoyed-realm〕) · the differentiation of elements remedies conceit (the six elements, "body" but a designation) · mindfulness of breathing remedies discursive thought (in-breath and out-breath, long, short, pervading the whole body · impermanent).
-
★The object-image is nothing but consciousness (doctrinal eye · heavy · Saṃdhinirmocana, Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis): the object-image within meditation that insight rests upon is judged by the sūtra — "I say that the object of consciousness is nothing but the appearance of consciousness" + the mirror simile "as, in dependence on a well-burnished, clean mirror-face, with the substance as condition one sees again that very substance" 〔Saṃdhinirmocana T16 0698b〕; and one-pointedness of mind is just "penetrating that the image ranged over in meditative equipoise is nothing but consciousness (the extent-of-being layer) → and further reflecting on the way-of-being (the way-of-being layer)" 〔T16 0698b22〕. The object-image that śrāvaka tranquillity-and-insight rests upon is judged by the sūtra itself to be nothing but the appearance of consciousness — the in-scripture pivot on which śrāvaka tranquillity-and-insight communicates with the Consciousness-Only meaning (per the Saṃdhinirmocana scriptural text · spoken by the Buddha · Xuanzang's translation · not a modern reading).
Appended: the joined operation of tranquillity and insight (resting on tranquillity → insight is purified · resting on insight → tranquillity grows and expands 〔T30 0455b〕); the object of skill and the object that purifies the afflictions likewise run the six matters, and the treatise says plainly "I shall speak of that in its own place," pointing forward (to the Ascertainment / the later section); the nine mental abidings are the source of the "nine mental abidings" carried forward by the later Maitreya-Asaṅga treatises (the Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra T31n1604 · the Mahāyānasaṃgraha lineage) (carrying forward · stable citation). Two states of the ancients: Dunlun's Notes fascicle 7, latter part 〔from T42 0462c28 · glossing in sequence the six forces / four attentions / three cognitions / the impure / dependent origination / elements / breathing · citing Tai / Bei / the Tripiṭaka-master〕; Kuiji's Concise Compendium fascicle 8 · treatise fascicle 30 〔from T43 0118b04 · the nine abidings pertaining to both equipoise and the diffuse / the six forces / the three natures of the nature-of-things principle / the impure〕; Jinaputra has no line-by-line dedicated gloss 〔T30 0884a24, one line only〕. For loving-kindness the ancients are brief (Dunlun: "clear from the text" 0464b01 · Kuiji fascicle 30: absent). For the doctrinal exposition, see the Exposition.
云何心一境性?謂數數隨念同分所緣,流注、無罪適悅相應,令心相續,名三摩地,亦名為善心一境性。 何等名為數數隨念?謂於正法聽聞受持,從師獲得教誡教授增上力故,令其定地諸相現前。緣此為境,流注、無罪適悅相應,所有正念隨轉安住。云何名為同分所緣?謂諸定地所緣境界,非一眾多種種品類,緣此為境,令心正行,說名為定,此即名為同分所緣。 問:此所緣境是誰同分,說為同分? 答:是所知事相似品類,故名同分。復由彼念,於所緣境無散亂行,無缺無間。無間、殷重加行適悅相應而轉,故名流注適悅相應。又由彼念,於所緣境無有染污,極安隱住,熟道適悅相應而轉,故名無罪適悅相應。 是故說言:數數隨念同分所緣,流注、無罪適悅相應,令心相續,名三摩地,亦名為善心一境性。 復次,如是心一境性,或是奢摩他品,或是毘鉢舍那品。 若於九種心住中心一境性,是名奢摩他品;若於四種慧行中心一境性,是名毘鉢舍那品。 云何名為九種心住?謂有苾芻,令心內住、等住、安住、近住、調順、寂靜、最極寂靜、專注一趣,及以等持;如是名為九種心住。 云何內住?謂從外一切所緣境界攝錄其心,繫在於內,令不散亂。此則最初繫縛其心,令住於內,不外散亂,故名內住。 云何等住?謂即最初所繫縛心,其性麁動,未能令其等住、遍住故。次即於此所緣境界,以相續方便、澄淨方便,挫令微細,遍攝令住,故名等住。 云何安住?謂若此心雖復如是內住、等住,然由失念於外散亂,復還攝錄安置內境,故名安住。 云何近住?謂彼先應如是如是親近念住,由此念故,數數作意內住其心,不令此心遠住於外;故名近住。 云何調順?謂種種相令心散亂,所謂色、聲、香、味、觸相,及貪、瞋、癡、男、女等相故,彼先應取彼諸相為過患想。由如是想增上力故,於彼諸相折挫其心,不令流散,故名調順。 云何寂靜?謂有種種欲恚害等諸惡尋思、貪欲蓋等諸隨煩惱,令心擾動,故彼先應取彼諸法為過患想。由如是想增上力故,於諸尋思及隨煩惱,止息其心,不令流散,故名寂靜。 云何名為最極寂靜?謂失念故,即彼二種暫現行時,隨所生起諸惡尋思及隨煩惱,能不忍受,尋即斷滅、除遣、變吐,是故名為最極寂靜。 云何名為專注一趣?謂有加行、有功用、無缺無間三摩地相續而住,是故名為專注一趣。 云何等持?謂數修、數習、數多修習為因緣故,得無加行、無功用任運轉道。由是因緣,不由加行、不由功用,心三摩地任運相續,無散亂轉,故名等持。 當知此中,由六種力,方能成辦九種心住。一、聽聞力,二、思惟力,三、憶念力,四、正知力,五、精進力,六、串習力。初由聽聞、思惟二力,數聞數思增上力故,最初令心於內境住,及即於此相續方便、澄淨方便,等遍安住。如是於內繫縛心已,由憶念力、數數作意攝錄其心,令不散亂,安住、近住。從此已後,由正知力調息其心,於其諸相、諸惡尋思、諸隨煩惱,不令流散,調順、寂靜。由精進力,設彼二種暫現行時,能不忍受,尋即斷滅、除遣、變吐,最極寂靜、專注一趣。由串習力,等持成滿。 即於如是九種心住,當知復有四種作意。一、力勵運轉作意,二、有間缺運轉作意,三、無間缺運轉作意,四、無功用運轉作意。 於內住、等住中,有力勵運轉作意;於安住、近住、調順、寂靜、最極寂靜中,有有間缺運轉作意;於專注一趣中,有無間缺運轉作意;於等持中,有無功用運轉作意。當知如是四種作意,於九種心住中,是奢摩他品。又即如是獲得內心奢摩他者,於毘鉢舍那勤修習時,復即由是四種作意,方能修習毘鉢舍那,故此亦是毘鉢舍那品。 云何四種毘鉢舍那?謂有苾芻,依止內心奢摩他故,於諸法中能正思擇、最極思擇、周遍尋思、周遍伺察,是名四種毘鉢舍那。 云何名為能正思擇?謂於淨行所緣境界、或於善巧所緣境界、或於淨惑所緣境界,能正思擇盡所有性。 云何名為最極思擇?謂即於彼所緣境界,最極思擇如所有性。 云何名為周遍尋思?謂即於彼所緣境界,由慧俱行有分別作意,取彼相狀,周遍尋思。 云何名為周遍伺察?謂即於彼所緣境界,審諦推求,周遍伺察。 又即如是毘鉢舍那,由三門、六事差別所緣,當知復有多種差別。 云何三門毘鉢舍那?一、唯隨相行毘鉢舍那,二、隨尋思行毘鉢舍那,三、隨伺察行毘鉢舍那。云何名為唯隨相行毘鉢舍那?謂於所聞所受持法,或於教授教誡諸法,由等引地如理作意,暫爾思惟,未思、未量、未推、未察。如是名為唯隨相行毘鉢舍那。若復於彼思量推察,爾時名為隨尋思行毘鉢舍那。若復於彼既推察已,如所安立復審觀察,如是名為隨伺察行毘鉢舍那。是名三門毘鉢舍那。 云何六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?謂尋思時,尋思六事。一、義,二、事,三、相,四、品,五、時,六、理。既尋思已,復審伺察。 云何名為尋思於義?謂正尋思如是如是語,有如是如是義。如是名為尋思於義。 云何名為尋思於事?謂正尋思內外二事。如是名為尋思於事。 云何名為尋思於相?謂正尋思諸法二相。一者、自相,二者、共相。如是名為尋思於相。 云何名為尋思於品?謂正尋思諸法二品。一者、黑品,二者、白品。尋思黑品過失過患,尋思白品功德勝利。如是名為尋思於品。 云何名為尋思於時?謂正尋思過去、未來、現在三時。尋思如是事,曾在過去世;尋思如是事,當在未來世;尋思如是事,今在現在世。如是名為尋思於時。 云何名為尋思於理?謂正尋思四種道理。一、觀待道理,二、作用道理,三、證成道理,四、法爾道理。當知此中,由觀待道理,尋思世俗以為世俗,尋思勝義以為勝義,尋思因緣以為因緣。由作用道理,尋思諸法所有作用。謂如是如是法,有如是如是作用。由證成道理,尋思三量。一、至教量,二、比度量,三、現證量。謂正尋思如是如是義、為有至教不?為現證可得不?為應比度不?由法爾道理,於如實諸法成立法性、難思法性、安住法性,應生信解,不應思議、不應分別。如是名為尋思於理。如是六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那,及前三門毘鉢舍那,略攝一切毘鉢舍那。 問:何因緣故,建立如是六事差別毘鉢舍那? 答:依三覺故,如是建立。何等三覺?一、語義覺,二、事邊際覺,三、如實覺。尋思義故,起語義覺;尋思其事及自相故,起事邊際覺;尋思共相、品時、理故,起如實覺。修瑜伽師唯有爾所所知境界。所謂語義,及所知事盡所有性、如所有性。 云何勤修不淨觀者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那? 謂依不淨增上正法聽聞受持增上力故,由等引地如理作意,解了其義。知此不淨實為不淨,深可厭逆,其性朽穢,惡臭生臭。由如是等種種行相,於先所聞依諸不淨所說正法,解了其義。如是名為於諸不淨尋思其義。 云何名為尋思彼事?謂彼如是解了義已,觀不淨物,建立二分,謂內及外。如是名為尋思彼事。 云何名為尋思自相?謂且於內身中所有穢朽不淨,發起勝解。了知身中有髮、毛等,廣說乃至腦膜、小便。復於如是身中所有多不淨物,攝為二界,發起勝解。所謂地界及以水界。始於髮、毛,乃至大便,起地勝解;始於淚、污乃至小便,起水勝解。如是名為依內不淨尋思自相。 復於其外諸不淨物,由青瘀等種種行相,發起勝解。謂先發起青瘀勝解,或親自見、或從他聞、或由分別所有死屍。如是死屍,或男、或女、或非男女,或親、或怨、或是中庸,或劣、或中、或復是勝,或是少年、或是中年、或是老年。取彼相已,若此死屍死經一日,血流已盡,未至膿爛,於是發起青瘀勝解。若此死屍死經二日,已至膿爛,未生蟲蛆,於是發起膿爛勝解。若此死屍死經七日,已生蟲蛆,身體已壞,於是發起爛壞勝解、𮌨脹勝解。若此死屍為諸狐狼、鵄梟、鵰鷲、烏鵲、餓狗之所食噉,於是發起食噉勝解。即此死屍既被食已,皮肉血盡,唯筋纏骨,於是發起異赤勝解。若此死屍或被食噉,支節分離,散在處處,或有其肉,或無其肉,或餘少肉,於是發起分散勝解。若此死屍骨節分散,手骨異處、足骨異處、膝骨異處、髀骨異處、髖骨異處、髆骨異處、臂骨異處、脊骨異處、頷輪異處、齒鬘異處、髑髏異處,見是事已,起骨勝解。若復思惟如是骸骨共相連接而不分散,唯取麁相,不委細取支節屈曲,如是爾時起鎖勝解。若委細取支節屈曲,爾時發起骨鎖勝勝。又有二鎖。一、形骸鎖,二、支節鎖。形骸鎖者,謂從血鑊脊骨,乃至髑髏所住。支節鎖者,謂臂、髆等骨連鎖,及髀、膞等骨連鎖。此中形骸鎖,說名為鎖;若支節鎖,說名骨鎖。復有二種取骨鎖相。一、取假名綵畫木石泥等所作骨鎖相。二、取真實骨鎖相。若思惟假名骨鎖相時,爾時唯名起鎖勝解,不名骨鎖。若思惟真實骨鎖相時,爾時名起骨鎖勝解。又即此外造色色相,三種變壞。一、自然變壞,二、他所變壞,三、俱品變壞。始從青瘀乃至𮌨脹、是自然變壞。始從食噉乃至分散,是他所變壞。若骨、若鎖、及以骨鎖,是俱品變壞。若能如是如實了知外不淨相,是名尋思外諸所有不淨自相。 云何尋思不淨共相?謂若內身,外淨色相未有變壞;若在外身,不淨色相已有變壞。由在內身不淨色相平等法性、相似法性,發起勝解,能自了知我淨色相亦有如是同彼法性;若諸有情成就如是淨色相者,彼淨色相亦有如是同彼法性;譬如在外不淨色相。是名尋思不淨共相。 云何名為尋思彼品?謂作是思:若我於彼諸淨色相不淨法性不如實知,於內、於外諸淨色相發起貪欲,便為顛倒,黑品所攝,是有諍法,有苦、有害、有諸災患、有遍燒惱。由是因緣,發起當來生老病死愁歎憂苦種種擾惱。若我於彼諸淨色相不淨法性如實隨觀,便無顛倒,白品所攝,是無諍法,無苦、無害,廣說乃至由此因緣,能滅當來生老病死,乃至擾惱。若諸黑品,我今於彼不應忍受,應斷、應遣。若諸白品我今於彼未生應生;生已令住,增長廣大。如是名為尋思彼品。 云何名為尋思彼時?謂作是思:若內所有諸淨色相,在現在世;若外所有不淨色相,亦現在世。諸過去世曾淨色相,彼於過去雖有淨相,而今現在如是次第種種不淨。諸現在世我之所有似淨色相,此淨色相於現在世雖有淨相,於未來世不當不淨如今現在外不淨色,無有是處。我此色身,去來今世,曾如是相、當如是相、現如是相,不過如是不淨法性。如是名為尋思彼時。 云何名為尋思彼理?謂作是思:若內若外都無有我、有情可得,或說為淨、或說不淨;唯有色相、唯有身形,於中假想施設言論,謂之為淨、或為不淨。又如說言:壽煖及與識,若棄捨身時,離執持而臥,無所思如木。既死沒已,漸次變壞分位可知。謂青瘀等,乃至骨鎖。今我此身,先業煩惱之所引發,父母不淨和合所生,糜飯等食之所增長。此因、此緣、此由藉故,雖暫時有諸淨色相似可了知,而內身中若內若外,於常常時,種種不淨皆悉充滿。如是名依世俗、勝義及以因緣觀待道理尋思彼理。復作是思:於此不淨,若能如是善修、善習、善多修習,能斷欲貪。如是欲貪,定應當斷。如是名依作用道理尋思彼理。復作是思:如世尊說:若於不淨善修、善習、善多修習,能斷欲貪。是至教量。我亦於內自能現見於諸不淨;如如作意思惟修習,如是如是令欲貪纏未生不生,生已除遣。是現證量。 比度量法亦有可得。謂作是思:云何今者作意思惟能對治法,可於能治所緣境界煩惱當生?如是名依證成道理尋思彼理。 復作是思:如是之法成立法性,難思法性、安住法性。謂修不淨,能與欲貪作斷對治,不應思議、不應分別,唯應信解。如是名依法爾道理尋思彼理。 是名勤修不淨觀者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。 云何勤修慈愍觀者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?謂依慈愍增上正法聽聞受持增上力故,由欲利益安樂意樂,於諸有情作意與樂,發起勝解,是慈愍相。若能如是解了其義,如是名為於諸慈愍尋思其義。彼既如是解了義已,復能思擇:此為親品、此為怨品、此中庸品。是一切品,皆他相續之所攝故,於中發起外事勝解。又若親品,名為內事;怨、中庸品,名為外事。如是名為於諸慈愍尋思其事。復能思擇:如是三品,若無苦樂欲求樂者,願彼得樂。今於此中,有饒益相,名為親品;不饒益相,名為怨品;俱相違相,名中庸品。如是三品,若無苦樂欲求樂者,略有三種欲求樂心差別可得。一者、欲求欲界諸樂;二者、欲求色界有喜勇悅諸樂;三者、欲求離喜諸樂。如是若於欲樂匱乏,願彼皆得無罪欲樂。若於有喜、離喜諸樂有所匱乏,當知亦爾。是名尋思慈愍自相。復審思擇:若諸親品、若諸怨品、若中庸品,我於其中皆當發起相似性心、平等性心。何以故?我若作意與親品樂,此未為難;於中庸品作意與樂,亦未甚難;若於怨品作意與樂,乃甚為難。我於怨品尚應作意願與其樂,何況親品及中庸品而不與樂。何以故?此中都無能罵、所罵、能瞋、所瞋、能弄、所弄、能打、所打,唯有音聲、唯有名字。又我此身,隨所生起,有色麁重四大所造,隨所住處,便為如是觸所逼惱。略有二觸,謂音聲觸,及手足塊刀杖等觸。是身及觸皆是無常,能為如是不饒益者亦是無常。又復一切有情之類,皆有生老病死等法,本性是苦;故我不應於本性苦諸有情上,更加其苦,而不與樂。又亦不應不與怨家作善知識、不攝一切有情之類以為自體。又世尊言:我不觀見如是種類有情可得。無始世來經歷生死,長時流轉,不互相為或父、或母、兄弟、姊妹,若軌範師,若親教師、若餘尊重、似尊重者。由是因緣,一切怨品無不皆是我之親品。又怨、親品,無有決定真實可得。何以故?親品餘時轉成怨品;怨品餘時轉成親品,是故一切無有決定。故我今者,應於一切有情之類,皆當發起平等性心、平等性見;及起相似利益意樂、安樂意樂與樂勝解。是名尋思慈愍共相。復審思擇:我若於彼不饒益者發生瞋恚,便為顛倒,黑品所攝,是有諍法,廣說如前。我若於彼不起瞋恚,便無顛倒,白品所攝,是無諍法,廣說如前。如是名為尋思慈愍黑品、白品。復審思擇:諸過去世求欲得樂有情之類,彼皆過去,我當云何能與其樂?諸現在世有情之類,我今願彼盡未來世,於一切時常受快樂。是名尋思諸慈愍時。復審思擇:此中都無我及有情,或求樂者、或與樂者;唯有諸蘊、唯有諸行,於中假想施設言論,此求樂者、此與樂者。又彼諸行,業煩惱等以為因緣。如是名依觀待道理尋思慈愍。若於慈愍善修、善習、善多修習,能斷瞋恚。如是名依作用道理尋思慈愍。如是之義,有至教量;我內智見現轉可得;比度量法,亦有可得。如是名依證成道理尋思慈愍。又即此法成立法性、難思法性、安住法性。謂修慈愍能斷瞋恚,不應思議、不應分別;應生勝解。如是名依法爾道理尋思慈愍。是名勤修慈愍觀者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。 本地分中聲聞地第十三第三瑜伽處之二 云何勤修緣起觀者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?謂依緣性緣起增上正法聽聞受持增上力故,能正了知如是如是諸法生故,彼彼法生;如是如是諸法滅故,彼彼法滅。此中都無自在、作者、生者、化者,能造諸法;亦無自性、士夫、中間能轉變者,轉變諸法。若能了知如是等義,是名尋思諸緣起義。復審思擇十二有支若內若外,而起勝解,是名尋思諸緣起事。復審思擇:無明支等,前際無知、後際無知。如是廣說,如前分別緣起支中。是名尋思緣起自相。 復審思擇:如是一切緣生諸行,無不皆是本無今有,有已散滅,是故前後皆是無常。皆有生老病死法故,其性是苦。不自在故,中間士夫不可得故;性空、無我。是名尋思緣起共相。復審思擇:我若於彼無常、苦、空、無我諸行如實道理發生迷惑,便為顛倒,黑品所攝,廣說如前。若不迷惑,便無顛倒,白品所攝,廣說如前。是名尋思諸緣起品。復審思擇:於過去世所得自體無正常性,如是已住;於現在世所得自體無正常性,如是今住;於未來世所得自體無正常性,如是當住。是名尋思諸緣起時。復審思擇:唯有諸業及異熟果,其中主宰都不可得。所謂作者及與受者。唯有於法假想建立。謂於無明緣行乃至生緣老死中,發起假相,施設言論,說為作者及與受者。有如是名、如是種、如是姓、如是飲食、如是領受若苦若樂、如是長壽、如是久住、如是極於壽量邊際。又於此中有二種果及二種因。二種果者:一、自體果,二、受用境界果。二種因者:一、牽引因,二、生起因。自體果者,謂於今世諸異熟生六處等法。受用境界果者,謂愛非愛業增上所起六觸所生諸受。 牽引因者,謂於二果發起愚癡;愚癡為先,生福、非福及不動行;行能攝受後有之識,令生有芽。謂能攝受識種子故,令其展轉攝受後有名色種子、六處種子、觸受種子。為令當來生支想所攝識、名色、六處、觸、受次第生故,今先攝受彼法種子。如是一切名牽引因。 生起因者,謂若領受諸無明觸所生受時,由境界愛生後有愛,及能攝受愛品、癡品所有諸取;由此勢力、由此功能,潤業種子,令其能與諸異熟果。如是一切名生起因。由此二因增上力故,便為三苦之所隨逐,招集一切純大苦蘊。如是名依觀待道理尋思緣起所有道理。復審思擇:於是緣性緣起觀中,善修、善習、善多修習,能斷愚癡。又審思擇:如是道理,有至教量,有內現證,有比度法,亦有成立法性等義。如是名依作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理尋思緣起所有道理。是名勤修緣起觀者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。 云何勤修界差別觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?謂依界差別增上正法聽聞受持增上力故,能正解了一切界義。謂種姓義及種子義、因義、性義,是其界義。如是名為尋思界義。又正尋思地等六界內外差別,發起勝解。如是名為尋思界事。又正尋思:地為堅相,乃至風為輕動相,識為了別相,空界為虛空相、遍滿色相、無障礙相。是名尋思諸界自相。又正尋思:此一切界,以要言之,皆是無常乃至無我。是名尋思諸界共相。又正尋思於一合相界差別性。不了知者,由界差別所合成身,發起高慢,便為顛倒,黑品所攝,廣說如前。與上相違,便無顛倒,白品所攝,廣說如前。如是名為尋思界品。又正尋思:去來今世六界為緣,得入母胎。如是名為尋思界時。又正尋思:如草木等眾緣和合,圍遶虛空,數名為舍。如是六界為所依故,筋骨血肉眾緣和合,圍遶虛空,假想、等想施設言論,數名為身。復由宿世諸業煩惱及自種子以為因緣。如是名依觀待道理尋思諸界差別道理。又正尋思:若於如是界差別觀善修、善習、善多修習,能斷憍慢。又正尋思:如是道理,有至教量,有內證智,有比度法,有成立法性、難思法性、安住法性。如是名依作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理尋思諸界差別道理。是名勤修界差別觀者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。 云何勤修阿那波那念者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?謂依入出息念增上正法聽聞受持增上力故,能正了知於入出息所緣境界,繫心了達,無忘明記,是阿那波那念義。如是名為尋思其義。又正尋思:入息、出息在內可得;繫屬身故,外處攝故,內外差別。如是名為尋思其事。又正尋思:入息有二,出息有二。若風入內,名為入息;若風出外、名為出息。復正了知:如是為長入息、出息,如是為短入息、出息,如是息遍一切身分。是名尋思諸息自相。又正尋思:入息滅已有出息生,出息滅已有入息生,入出息轉繫屬命根及有識身;此入出息及所依止皆是無常。是名尋思諸息共相。又正尋思:若於如是入息、出息不住正念,為惡尋思擾亂其心,便為顛倒,黑品所攝,是有諍法,廣說如前。與上相違,便無顛倒,白品所攝,是無諍法,廣說如前。如是名為尋思其品。又正尋思:去來今世,入出息轉繫屬身心,身心繫屬入息、出息。如是名為尋思其時。又正尋思:此中都無持入息者、持出息者,入息、出息繫屬於彼;唯於從因從緣所生諸行,發起假想,施設言論,說有能持入出息者。如是名依觀待道理尋思其理。又正尋思:若於如是入出息念善修、善習、善多修習,能斷尋思。又正尋思:如是道理,有至教量,有內證智,有比度法,有成立法性、難思法性、安住法性,不應思議、不應分別,唯應信解。如是名依作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理尋思其理。是名勤修阿那波那念者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。 如是依止淨行所緣,尋思六事差別觀已,數數於內令心寂靜,數數復於如所尋思,以勝觀行審諦伺察。彼由奢摩他為依止故,令毘鉢舍那速得清淨;復由毘鉢舍那為依止故,令奢摩他增長廣大。若依止善巧所緣及淨惑所緣,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那,於其自處我後當說。
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
安立五處的第三「心一境性」,從這裡正式開講。先界定心一境性,再分奢摩他(止)、毘鉢舍那(觀)兩品:止有九種心住、六種力、四種作意;觀有四種毘鉢舍那、三門、六事差別所緣,末了把六事所緣一一施於不淨、慈愍、緣起、界差別、阿那波那念五種淨行所緣。逐句依玄奘譯本今語,名相留舊,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。
心一境性·同分所緣
什麼是心一境性?就是一次又一次地隨念同一類所緣(同分所緣),心相續地流注、與「無罪適悅」相應,令心相續不斷,這名為三摩地,也名為善的心一境性。
什麼叫「數數隨念」?就是對正法聽聞、受持,又從師長獲得教誡教授,由這增上力,令定地的種種相現前;緣這些相為境,流注、與無罪適悅相應,所有的正念隨之而轉、安住下來。什麼叫「同分所緣」?就是諸定地的所緣境界,不是一種、而是眾多種種品類;緣這些為境、令心正行,名為定,這就名為同分所緣。
問:這所緣境是「誰的同分」,而說為同分?
答:是「所知事」相似的品類,所以名同分。又因為那念,於所緣境無散亂、無缺、無間而行——無間又殷重地加行、與適悅相應而轉,所以名「流注適悅相應」;又因為那念,於所緣境沒有染污、極安隱地住、與熟道(純熟之道)的適悅相應而轉,所以名「無罪適悅相應」。所以才說:數數隨念同分所緣、流注無罪適悅相應、令心相續,名三摩地,也名善心一境性。
這樣的心一境性,或屬奢摩他品、或屬毘鉢舍那品:若在九種心住中的心一境性,名奢摩他品;若在四種慧行中的心一境性,名毘鉢舍那品。
九種心住:把心繫住的九個階位
什麼是九種心住?就是有比丘令心——內住、等住、安住、近住、調順、寂靜、最極寂靜、專注一趣、以及等持——這樣名為九種心住。
- 什麼是內住? 把心從外面一切所緣境界收攝回來,繫在內裡,令它不散亂。這是最初繫縛其心、令住於內、不向外散,所以名內住。
- 什麼是等住? 最初所繫的心,性還麁動,未能令它平等地住、遍滿地住;於是就在這所緣境界上,用「相續」的方便、「澄淨」的方便,把它挫得微細、遍攝令住,所以名等住。
- 什麼是安住? 這心雖已內住、等住,但若由失念又向外散亂,便再收攝回來、安置於內境,所以名安住。
- 什麼是近住? 他先要這樣那樣親近地修念住,由這念,一次次作意把心內住、不令此心遠住於外,所以名近住。
- 什麼是調順? 種種相令心散亂——所謂色、聲、香、味、觸五相,以及貪、瞋、癡、男、女等相;他先要把這些相取作「過患想」,由這想的增上力,於那些相上把心折挫住、不令流散,所以名調順。
- 什麼是寂靜? 有種種欲、恚、害等惡尋思,以及貪欲蓋等諸隨煩惱令心擾動;他先要把這些法取作過患想,由這想的增上力,於諸尋思及隨煩惱上把心止息住、不令流散,所以名寂靜。
- 什麼是最極寂靜? 由失念故,那兩種〔惡尋思與隨煩惱〕暫一現行時,隨所生起的惡尋思及隨煩惱,能不忍受、隨即斷滅、除遣、變吐,所以名最極寂靜。
- 什麼是專注一趣? 有加行、有功用,無缺、無間地三摩地相續而住,所以名專注一趣。
- 什麼是等持? 由數修、數習、數多修習為因緣,得到「無加行、無功用、任運而轉」之道;由這因緣,不靠加行、不靠功用,心的三摩地任運相續、無散亂而轉,所以名等持。
六種力:靠什麼成辦九住
要知道,這當中是由六種力,才能成辦九種心住:一聽聞力、二思惟力、三憶念力、四正知力、五精進力、六串習力。
最初由聽聞、思惟二力,數聞數思的增上力,令心最初於內境住,並就在此用相續、澄淨方便等遍安住——成辦內住、等住。如是於內繫縛心已,由憶念力數數作意收攝其心、令不散亂——成辦安住、近住。從此以後,由正知力調息其心,於諸相、諸惡尋思、諸隨煩惱不令流散——成辦調順、寂靜。由精進力,那兩種暫現行時能不忍受、隨即斷滅除遣變吐——成辦最極寂靜、專注一趣。由串習力,等持圓滿。
四種作意:配九住的四種用心
就在這九種心住上,要知道又有四種作意:一力勵運轉作意、二有間缺運轉作意、三無間缺運轉作意、四無功用運轉作意。
於內住、等住中,是「力勵運轉」作意;於安住、近住、調順、寂靜、最極寂靜中,是「有間缺運轉」作意;於專注一趣中,是「無間缺運轉」作意;於等持中,是「無功用運轉」作意。要知道這四種作意,於九種心住中是奢摩他品。又這已獲內心奢摩他的人,於毘鉢舍那勤修習時,也正是由這四種作意才能修習毘鉢舍那,所以這四作意也是毘鉢舍那品。
四種毘鉢舍那:觀的四種慧行
什麼是四種毘鉢舍那?就是有比丘依止內心奢摩他,於諸法中能正思擇、最極思擇、周遍尋思、周遍伺察,名四種毘鉢舍那。
- 什麼是能正思擇? 於淨行所緣境界、或善巧所緣境界、或淨惑所緣境界,能正思擇「盡所有性」。
- 什麼是最極思擇? 就在那所緣境界上,最極思擇「如所有性」。
- 什麼是周遍尋思? 就在那所緣境界上,由慧俱行的有分別作意,取其相狀,周遍地尋思。
- 什麼是周遍伺察? 就在那所緣境界上,審諦推求,周遍地伺察。
三門毘鉢舍那
這毘鉢舍那,由「三門」與「六事差別所緣」,要知道又有多種差別。
什麼是三門毘鉢舍那?一唯隨相行、二隨尋思行、三隨伺察行。什麼是「唯隨相行」?就是於所聞所受持的法、或於教授教誡諸法,由等引地的如理作意,暫且思惟,還未思、未量、未推、未察——這名唯隨相行毘鉢舍那。若又於那法思量推察,那時名隨尋思行毘鉢舍那。若又於那法既已推察、就所安立的再審觀察,這名隨伺察行毘鉢舍那。這名三門毘鉢舍那。
六事差別所緣:尋思六事+三覺
什麼是六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?就是在尋思之時,把六件事逐一加以尋思:第一件是語義,第二件是內外事,第三件是諸法之相,第四件是黑白品類,第五件是過去未來現在三時,第六件是四種道理。把這六事逐項尋思過後,還要再對所尋思的內容審諦推求、周遍伺察。
- 什麼是尋思於義? 正尋思「如是如是的語,有如是如是的義」。
- 什麼是尋思於事? 正尋思內、外二事。
- 什麼是尋思於相? 正尋思諸法二相——自相、共相。
- 什麼是尋思於品? 正尋思諸法二品——黑品、白品;尋思黑品的過失過患,尋思白品的功德勝利。
- 什麼是尋思於時? 正尋思過去、未來、現在三時——這事曾在過去世、當在未來世、今在現在世。
- 什麼是尋思於理? 正尋思四種道理。一觀待道理:尋思世俗為世俗、勝義為勝義、因緣為因緣。二作用道理:尋思諸法所有作用——如是法有如是作用。三證成道理:尋思三量——至教量、比度量、現證量,即正尋思此義有沒有至教?是否現證可得?是否應比度?四法爾道理:於如實諸法成立的法性、難思法性、安住法性,應生信解,不應思議、不應分別。
這六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那,連同前面的三門毘鉢舍那,總攝一切毘鉢舍那。
問:什麼緣故,建立這六事差別毘鉢舍那?
答:依「三覺」而建立。哪三覺?一語義覺、二事邊際覺、三如實覺。尋思「義」故,起語義覺;尋思「事」及「自相」故,起事邊際覺;尋思「共相、品、時、理」故,起如實覺。修瑜伽師所知的境界唯有這麼多——所謂語義,以及所知事的盡所有性、如所有性。
六事所緣施於五淨行(一)不淨觀
什麼是勤修不淨觀者,尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?
尋思義:依不淨增上的正法聽聞受持的增上力,由等引地的如理作意,解了其義——知道這不淨實在是不淨,深可厭逆,其性朽穢、惡臭、生臭;由這種種行相,於先前所聞依諸不淨所說的正法,解了其義。
尋思彼事:解了義後,觀不淨物,建立二分——內、外。
尋思自相:先於內身所有穢朽不淨發起勝解,了知身中有髮、毛等,廣說乃至腦膜、小便;又把身中這許多不淨物攝為二界——地界、水界:從髮、毛乃至大便起地界勝解,從淚、污乃至小便起水界勝解。這是依內不淨尋思自相。 再於外的諸不淨物,由青瘀等種種行相發起勝解:所觀的死屍,或男或女或非男女,或親或怨或中庸,或劣或中或勝,或少年中年老年。取彼相已——若死經一日、血流已盡、未至膿爛,發起青瘀勝解;死經二日、已至膿爛、未生蟲蛆,發起膿爛勝解;死經七日、已生蟲蛆、身體已壞,發起爛壞、胮脹勝解;若為狐狼、鵄梟、鵰鷲、烏鵲、餓狗所食噉,發起食噉勝解;既被食已、皮肉血盡、唯筋纏骨,發起異赤勝解;或被食噉、支節分離、散在處處(或有肉、或無肉、或餘少肉),發起分散勝解;若骨節分散,手骨、足骨、膝骨、髀骨、髖骨、髆骨、臂骨、脊骨、頷輪、齒鬘、髑髏各在異處,起骨勝解;若思惟骸骨相連而不分散、只取麁相、不細取支節屈曲,這時起鎖勝解;若細取支節屈曲,這時起骨鎖勝解。 又有二鎖:一形骸鎖(從血鑊脊骨乃至髑髏所住)、二支節鎖(臂髆等骨連鎖、髀膞等骨連鎖);形骸鎖名為「鎖」,支節鎖名為「骨鎖」。又有二種取骨鎖相:一取假名(綵畫、木、石、泥等所作的骨鎖相)、二取真實骨鎖相——思惟假名骨鎖相時只名起「鎖」勝解、不名骨鎖,思惟真實骨鎖相時才名起「骨鎖」勝解。 又這外造色的色相有三種變壞:一自然變壞(從青瘀乃至胮脹)、二他所變壞(從食噉乃至分散)、三俱品變壞(若骨、若鎖、及骨鎖)。能這樣如實了知外不淨相,名尋思外諸所有不淨自相。
尋思共相:內身的外淨色相還未變壞、外身的不淨色相已變壞;由內身不淨色相的「平等法性、相似法性」發起勝解,能自了知「我的淨色相也有同它一樣的法性;若諸有情成就這樣淨色相者,他的淨色相也有同它一樣的法性,譬如外面的不淨色相」。這名尋思不淨共相。
尋思彼品:作這樣思——我若於那諸淨色相的不淨法性不如實知,於內於外諸淨色相發起貪欲,便是顛倒、屬黑品,是有諍法,有苦、有害、有諸災患、有遍燒惱,由此因緣發起當來生老病死愁歎憂苦種種擾惱;我若於那諸淨色相的不淨法性如實隨觀,便無顛倒、屬白品,是無諍法,無苦無害,廣說乃至能滅當來生老病死乃至擾惱。諸黑品我今不應忍受、應斷應遣;諸白品我今未生應生、生已令住增長廣大。這名尋思彼品。
尋思彼時:作這樣思——內所有諸淨色相在現在世、外所有不淨色相也在現在世;過去世曾淨的色相,過去雖有淨相、如今現在已是種種不淨;現在世我所有似淨的色相,現在雖有淨相、到未來世必不會「不變不淨」如今現在的外不淨色,那是不可能的。我這色身,過去未來現在,曾如是相、當如是相、現如是相,不過如是不淨法性。這名尋思彼時。
尋思彼理:作這樣思——若內若外都無有「我、有情」可得、可說為淨或不淨,唯有色相、唯有身形,於中假想施設言論說之為淨或不淨。又如所說:壽、煖與識,棄捨身時,便離執持而臥,無所思如木;既死沒已,漸次變壞分位可知(青瘀等乃至骨鎖)。今我這身,是先業煩惱所引發、父母不淨和合所生、糜飯等食所增長;由此因、此緣、此由藉,雖暫時有似可了知的淨色相,而內身中若內若外,於常常時種種不淨皆悉充滿。這名依世俗、勝義及因緣的觀待道理尋思彼理。 又作這樣思——於此不淨若能善修、善習、善多修習,能斷欲貪;這欲貪定應當斷。這名依作用道理尋思彼理。 又作這樣思——如世尊說「若於不淨善修善習善多修習能斷欲貪」,是至教量;我也於內自能現見諸不淨,如如作意思惟修習、便如是令欲貪纏未生不生、生已除遣,是現證量;比度量法也有可得——作這樣思「云何今者作意思惟能對治法,可於能治所緣境界煩惱當生?」這名依證成道理尋思彼理。 又作這樣思——這樣的法成立法性、難思法性、安住法性,謂修不淨能與欲貪作斷的對治,不應思議、不應分別、唯應信解。這名依法爾道理尋思彼理。
這名勤修不淨觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。
六事所緣施於五淨行(二)慈愍觀
什麼是勤修慈愍觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?
尋思義:依慈愍增上的正法聽聞受持增上力,由「欲利益安樂」的意樂,於諸有情作意與樂、發起勝解,這是慈愍相;能這樣解了其義,名於諸慈愍尋思其義。
尋思事:解了義已,能思擇此為親品、此為怨品、此中庸品;這一切品都是他人相續所攝,於中發起「外事勝解」;又親品名為內事,怨、中庸品名為外事。這名於諸慈愍尋思其事。
尋思自相:思擇這三品若是「無苦無樂、欲求樂」者,願他得樂——有饒益相的名親品、不饒益相的名怨品、俱相違相的名中庸品。這三品若無苦樂欲求樂者,約有三種欲求樂心的差別:一欲求欲界諸樂、二欲求色界有喜勇悅諸樂、三欲求離喜諸樂;若於欲樂匱乏,願他皆得無罪欲樂,若於有喜、離喜諸樂有所匱乏也如此。這名尋思慈愍自相。
尋思共相:審思擇——對親、怨、中庸三品,我都當發起「相似性心、平等性心」。為什麼?我作意與親品樂不難、與中庸品樂也不甚難、與怨品樂才最難;我對怨品尚應作意願與其樂,何況親品、中庸品而不與樂?為什麼?這當中本無能罵所罵、能瞋所瞋、能弄所弄、能打所打,唯有音聲、唯有名字;又我這身隨所生起,是有色麁重四大所造,隨所住處便被這樣的觸所逼惱(略有二觸:音聲觸、及手足塊刀杖等觸),這身與觸都是無常,能作不饒益者也是無常;又一切有情皆有生老病死等法、本性是苦,我不應於本性苦的有情身上更加其苦而不與樂;又不應不與怨家作善知識、不攝一切有情以為自體;又世尊說「我不見有這樣一類有情,無始世來經歷生死、長時流轉,不曾互相做過父母、兄弟、姊妹、軌範師、親教師、或其餘尊重似尊重者」,由此因緣一切怨品無不皆是我的親品;又怨親品無有決定真實可得——親品餘時轉成怨品、怨品餘時轉成親品,所以一切無有決定。所以我今應於一切有情皆發起平等性心、平等性見,及起相似的利益意樂、安樂意樂、與樂勝解。這名尋思慈愍共相。
尋思品:審思擇——我若於那不饒益者起瞋恚,便是顛倒、屬黑品、是有諍法(廣說如前);我若不起瞋恚,便無顛倒、屬白品、是無諍法(廣說如前)。這名尋思慈愍黑品、白品。
尋思時:審思擇——過去世求欲得樂的有情,他們皆已過去,我當如何能與其樂?現在世的有情,我今願他盡未來世於一切時常受快樂。這名尋思諸慈愍時。
尋思理:審思擇——這當中都無「我及有情、或求樂者、或與樂者」,唯有諸蘊、唯有諸行,於中假想施設言論說此求樂者、此與樂者;又那諸行以業煩惱等為因緣。這名依觀待道理尋思慈愍。若於慈愍善修善習善多修習能斷瞋恚,這名依作用道理尋思慈愍。這樣的義有至教量、我內智見現轉可得、比度量法也有可得,這名依證成道理尋思慈愍。又這法成立法性、難思法性、安住法性,謂修慈愍能斷瞋恚,不應思議不應分別、應生勝解,這名依法爾道理尋思慈愍。
這名勤修慈愍觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。
〔本地分中聲聞地第十三第三瑜伽處之二〕
六事所緣施於五淨行(三)緣起觀
什麼是勤修緣起觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?
尋思義:依緣性緣起增上的正法聽聞受持增上力,能正了知「如是如是諸法生故、彼彼法生;如是如是諸法滅故、彼彼法滅」;這當中都無「自在、作者、生者、化者」能造諸法,也無「自性、士夫、中間能轉變者」轉變諸法。能了知這等義,名尋思諸緣起義。
尋思事:審思擇十二有支若內若外而起勝解。名尋思諸緣起事。
尋思自相:審思擇無明支等的「前際無知、後際無知」(如前分別緣起支中廣說)。名尋思緣起自相。
尋思共相:審思擇——這一切緣生諸行,無不皆是本無今有、有已散滅,所以前後皆是無常;皆有生老病死法故、其性是苦;不自在故、中間士夫不可得故,所以性空、無我。名尋思緣起共相。
尋思品:審思擇——我若於那無常苦空無我的諸行如實道理發生迷惑,便是顛倒、屬黑品(廣說如前);若不迷惑,便無顛倒、屬白品(廣說如前)。名尋思諸緣起品。
尋思時:審思擇——過去世所得自體無正常性、如是已住,現在世所得自體無正常性、如是今住,未來世所得自體無正常性、如是當住。名尋思諸緣起時。
尋思理:審思擇——唯有諸業及異熟果,其中「主宰」都不可得(所謂作者及受者);唯有於法假想建立——於「無明緣行乃至生緣老死」中發起假相、施設言論說為作者及受者,有如是名、如是種、如是姓、如是飲食、如是領受若苦若樂、如是長壽、如是久住、如是極於壽量邊際。又此中有二種果、二種因:二種果——一自體果(今世諸異熟生的六處等法)、二受用境界果(愛非愛業增上所起的六觸所生諸受);二種因——一牽引因、二生起因。 牽引因:於二果發起愚癡;愚癡為先,生福、非福及不動行;行能攝受後有之識、令生有芽——即能攝受識種子,令它展轉攝受後有的名色種子、六處種子、觸受種子;為令當來生支所攝的識、名色、六處、觸、受次第得生,今先攝受彼法種子。這一切名牽引因。 生起因:若領受諸無明觸所生受時,由「境界愛」生「後有愛」、及能攝受愛品癡品所有諸取;由這勢力、這功能,潤業種子,令它能與諸異熟果。這一切名生起因。 由這二因增上力,便為三苦所隨逐、招集一切純大苦蘊。這名依觀待道理尋思緣起所有道理。又審思擇於這緣性緣起觀善修善習善多修習能斷愚癡;又審思擇這道理有至教量、有內現證、有比度法、也有成立法性等義——這名依作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理尋思緣起所有道理。
這名勤修緣起觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。
六事所緣施於五淨行(四)界差別觀
什麼是勤修界差別觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?
尋思義:依界差別增上的正法聽聞受持增上力,能正解了一切界義——謂種姓義、種子義、因義、性義,是其界義。名尋思界義。
尋思事:正尋思地等六界的內外差別、發起勝解。名尋思界事。
尋思自相:正尋思——地為堅相、〔水為濕相、火為煖相、〕乃至風為輕動相,識為了別相,空界為虛空相、遍滿色相、無障礙相。名尋思諸界自相。
尋思共相:正尋思——這一切界,要言之皆是無常乃至無我。名尋思諸界共相。
尋思品:正尋思「於一合相的界差別性」——不了知者,由界差別所合成的身發起高慢,便是顛倒、屬黑品(廣說如前);與上相違,便無顛倒、屬白品(廣說如前)。名尋思界品。
尋思時:正尋思——去來今世以六界為緣、得入母胎。名尋思界時。
尋思理:正尋思——如草木等眾緣和合、圍遶虛空,數〔計〕名為舍;如是六界為所依故,筋骨血肉眾緣和合、圍遶虛空,由假想等想施設言論,數名為身;又由宿世諸業煩惱及自種子為因緣。這名依觀待道理尋思諸界差別道理。又正尋思若於界差別觀善修善習善多修習能斷憍慢;又正尋思這道理有至教量、有內證智、有比度法、有成立法性難思法性安住法性——這名依作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理尋思諸界差別道理。
這名勤修界差別觀者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。
六事所緣施於五淨行(五)阿那波那念
什麼是勤修阿那波那念〔入出息念〕者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那?
尋思義:依入出息念增上的正法聽聞受持增上力,能正了知「於入出息所緣境界繫心了達、無忘明記」,是阿那波那念義。名尋思其義。
尋思事:正尋思——入息、出息在內可得,繫屬身故、外處攝故,有內外差別。名尋思其事。
尋思自相:正尋思——入息有二、出息有二:風入內名入息、風出外名出息;又正了知如是為長入息出息、如是為短入息出息、如是息遍一切身分。名尋思諸息自相。
尋思共相:正尋思——入息滅已有出息生、出息滅已有入息生,入出息轉繫屬命根及有識身,這入出息及所依止皆是無常。名尋思諸息共相。
尋思品:正尋思——若於入出息不住正念、為惡尋思擾亂其心,便是顛倒、屬黑品、是有諍法(廣說如前);與上相違便無顛倒、屬白品、是無諍法(廣說如前)。名尋思其品。
尋思時:正尋思——去來今世入出息轉繫屬身心、身心繫屬入出息。名尋思其時。
尋思理:正尋思——這當中都無「持入息者、持出息者」令入出息繫屬於他,唯於從因從緣所生諸行發起假想、施設言論說有能持入出息者。這名依觀待道理尋思其理。又正尋思若於入出息念善修善習善多修習能斷尋思;又正尋思這道理有至教量、有內證智、有比度法、有成立法性難思法性安住法性,不應思議不應分別唯應信解——這名依作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理尋思其理。
這名勤修阿那波那念者尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那。
止觀雙運·善巧淨惑後說
這樣依止淨行所緣、尋思六事差別觀已,一次次於內令心寂靜,又一次次於所尋思的、以勝觀行審諦伺察:他由奢摩他為依止故,令毘鉢舍那速得清淨;又由毘鉢舍那為依止故,令奢摩他增長廣大。至於依止善巧所緣及淨惑所緣而尋思六事差別所緣毘鉢舍那,在其自處〔後文〕我當再說。
The third of the five things established, "one-pointedness of mind," is here formally taken up. First one-pointedness of mind is defined; then it divides into the two divisions of tranquillity (śamatha) and insight (vipaśyanā): tranquillity has the nine mental abidings, the six forces, and the four attentions; insight has the four insights, the three gateways, and the object-differentiated-by-six-matters, and at the last the object-of-six-matters is applied, one by one, to the five stilling contemplations of the impure, loving-kindness, dependent origination, the differentiation of elements, and mindfulness of in-and-out breathing. Rendered line by line in today's language from Xuanzang's translation; the technical terms are left in their old form, no doctrine is added, no treatise cited, no Sanskrit annotated; where the treatise's wording is compressed it is supplied back within 〔brackets〕.
One-Pointedness of Mind · The Object of the Same Class
What is one-pointedness of mind? It is recollecting again and again an object of one same class (an object of the same class), the mind flowing on continuously, consorting with a "blameless ease," so that the mind is kept in unbroken continuity — this is named concentration, and is also named the wholesome one-pointedness of mind.
What is called "recollecting again and again"? It is that, toward the true Dharma one has heard and retained, and having received instruction and teaching from a teacher, by this reinforcing force the various marks of the meditative stage come to appear before one; taking these marks as the object, flowing on, consorting with a blameless ease, all the right mindfulness turns along with them and abides. What is called "the object of the same class"? It is that the object-fields of the several meditative stages are not of one kind but of many various sorts and classes; to take these as the object and make the mind operate rightly is named meditation, and this is named the object of the same class.
Question: this object-field — of "what" is it the same class, that it is called of the same class?
Answer: it is a class resembling the thing-to-be-known, and so is named of the same class. Again, because that mindfulness operates upon the object-field without scattering, without lapse, without interval — operating without interval and with earnest, sustained application, and turning in consort with ease — it is therefore named "flowing on and consorting with ease"; and again, because that mindfulness operates upon the object-field without defilement, abiding in utmost security, and turning in consort with the ease of the ripened path (the path made thoroughly familiar), it is therefore named "consorting with a blameless ease." This is why it is said: recollecting again and again an object of the same class, flowing on and consorting with a blameless ease, keeping the mind in continuity, is named concentration, and is also named the wholesome one-pointedness of mind.
Such one-pointedness of mind belongs either to the tranquillity division or to the insight division: when it is the one-pointedness of mind within the nine mental abidings, it is named the tranquillity division; when it is the one-pointedness of mind within the four wisdom-practices, it is named the insight division.
The Nine Mental Abidings: The Nine Stations of Binding the Mind
What are the nine mental abidings? They are that a monk makes the mind — abide within, abide evenly, abide settled, abide close, become tamed, become stilled, become utterly stilled, become single-pointed in absorption, and become held-in-equipoise — and this is named the nine mental abidings.
- What is inner abiding? Gathering the mind back from every outer object-field and binding it within, so that it does not scatter. This is the very first binding of the mind, making it abide within and not scatter outward, and so it is named inner abiding.
- What is even abiding? The mind first bound is still coarse and restless in nature, not yet able to be made to abide evenly and to abide pervasively; and so, upon this object-field, by the expedient of "continuity" and the expedient of "clarifying," it is ground down fine and gathered all round into abiding, and so it is named even abiding.
- What is settled abiding? Though this mind has already abided within and abided evenly, yet if through loss of mindfulness it scatters outward again, one gathers it back once more and sets it upon the inner object, and so it is named settled abiding.
- What is close abiding? He must first draw near, in this way and that, and cultivate the abiding of mindfulness; by this mindfulness, attending again and again, he makes the mind abide within and does not let this mind abide far off outside, and so it is named close abiding.
- What is taming? The various marks make the mind scatter — namely the five marks of color, sound, smell, taste, and touch, and the marks of greed, hatred, delusion, man, woman, and the like; he must first take these marks as the "thought of fault," and by the reinforcing force of this thought, upon those marks he breaks the mind down and abides, not letting it flow loose, and so it is named tamed.
- What is stilling? There are the various evil thoughts of desire, ill-will, harm, and the like, and the several secondary afflictions such as the hindrance of covetousness, which come to disturb the mind; he must first take these dharmas as the thought of fault, and by the reinforcing force of this thought, upon the thoughts and the secondary afflictions he brings the mind to rest and abides, not letting it flow loose, and so it is named stilled.
- What is utter stilling? Through loss of mindfulness, when those two 〔evil thoughts and secondary afflictions〕 briefly operate for a moment, whatever evil thoughts and secondary afflictions arise, he is able not to endure them, and at once severs, expels, removes, and vomits them out, and so it is named utterly stilled.
- What is single-pointed absorption? With exertion, with effort, the meditative equipoise abides in continuity without lapse and without interval, and so it is named single-pointed absorption.
- What is holding in equipoise? By repeated cultivation, repeated practice, and much repeated cultivation as cause and condition, one gains the path that is "without exertion, without effort, and runs on of itself"; by this cause and condition, without relying on exertion and without relying on effort, the mind's meditative equipoise continues of itself, turning without scattering, and so it is named held-in-equipoise.
The Six Forces: By What the Nine Abidings Are Accomplished
It should be known that herein it is by six forces that the nine mental abidings can be accomplished: first, the force of hearing; second, the force of reflection; third, the force of recollection; fourth, the force of full awareness; fifth, the force of vigor; sixth, the force of repeated practice.
At the first, by the two forces of hearing and reflection, by the reinforcing force of repeated hearing and repeated reflecting, one makes the mind first abide upon the inner object, and right there, by the expedients of continuity, clarifying, and the rest, makes it abide all round — accomplishing inner abiding and even abiding. Having thus bound the mind within, by the force of recollection one attends again and again, gathers the mind back, and makes it not scatter — accomplishing settled abiding and close abiding. From this point on, by the force of full awareness one regulates and stills the mind, so that upon the various marks, the various evil thoughts, and the various secondary afflictions it is not let to flow loose — accomplishing tamed and stilled. By the force of vigor, when those two briefly operate one is able not to endure them but at once to sever, expel, remove, and vomit them out — accomplishing utterly stilled and single-pointed absorption. By the force of repeated practice, holding-in-equipoise is brought to fullness.
The Four Attentions: The Four Ways of Applying the Mind That Match the Nine Abidings
Right upon these nine mental abidings, it should be known that there are again four attentions: first, the attention of striving-operation; second, the attention of interrupted-operation; third, the attention of uninterrupted-operation; fourth, the attention of effortless-operation.
Within inner abiding and even abiding, it is the attention of "striving-operation"; within settled abiding, close abiding, tamed, stilled, and utterly stilled, it is the attention of "interrupted-operation"; within single-pointed absorption, it is the attention of "uninterrupted-operation"; within holding-in-equipoise, it is the attention of "effortless-operation." It should be known that these four attentions, within the nine mental abidings, are the tranquillity division. Again, when one who has already gained inner tranquillity of mind diligently cultivates insight, it is precisely by these four attentions that he can cultivate insight, and so these four attentions are also the insight division.
The Four Insights: The Four Wisdom-Practices of Contemplation
What are the four insights? They are that a monk, resting upon inner tranquillity of mind, is able, among the several dharmas, to discern correctly, to discern utterly, to investigate thoroughly, and to examine thoroughly — this is named the four insights.
- What is discerning correctly? Upon the object-field of the purifying practices, or the object-field of skill, or the object-field that purifies the afflictions, one is able to discern correctly the "extent-of-being."
- What is discerning utterly? Right upon that object-field, one discerns utterly the "way-of-being."
- What is investigating thoroughly? Right upon that object-field, by an attention that is discriminative and conjoined with wisdom, one grasps its mark and shape and investigates it thoroughly.
- What is examining thoroughly? Right upon that object-field, one probes and searches with care, and examines it thoroughly.
The Three Gateways of Insight
This insight, by "three gateways" and by the "object-differentiated-by-six-matters," should be known to have again many differentiations.
What are the three gateways of insight? First, that which follows the mark only; second, that which follows investigation; third, that which follows examination. What is "following the mark only"? It is that, upon the dharmas one has heard and retained, or upon the dharmas of instruction and teaching, by an attention in accord with principle at the stage of equipoise, one reflects for the moment, but has not yet reflected, weighed, probed, or examined — this is named the insight that follows the mark only. If one further weighs, probes, and examines that dharma, then it is named the insight that follows investigation. If one further, having probed and examined that dharma, once more contemplates with care what has been established, this is named the insight that follows examination. This is named the three gateways of insight.
The Object-Differentiated-by-Six-Matters: Investigating the Six Matters plus the Three Cognitions
What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters? It is that, when investigating, one investigates six matters one by one: first, the meaning of the words; second, the inner and outer things; third, the marks of the dharmas; fourth, the dark and white classes; fifth, the three times of past, future, and present; and sixth, the four principles. Having investigated each of these six matters, one then probes with care and examines thoroughly what has been investigated.
- What is investigating with regard to meaning? One correctly investigates that "such-and-such words have such-and-such meaning."
- What is investigating with regard to thing? One correctly investigates the two things, inner and outer.
- What is investigating with regard to mark? One correctly investigates the two marks of the several dharmas — the particular-mark and the common-mark.
- What is investigating with regard to class? One correctly investigates the two classes of the several dharmas — the dark class and the white class; investigating the fault and disaster of the dark class, and investigating the merit and excellence of the white class.
- What is investigating with regard to time? One correctly investigates the three times, past, future, and present — that this thing once was in the past age, will be in the future age, and now is in the present age.
- What is investigating with regard to principle? One correctly investigates the four principles. First, the principle of reliance: investigating the conventional as conventional, the ultimate as ultimate, and cause-and-condition as cause-and-condition. Second, the principle of function: investigating the several dharmas and all their functions — such a dharma has such a function. Third, the principle of proof: investigating the three means — the means of authoritative teaching, the means of inference, and the means of direct realization; that is, correctly investigating whether this meaning has any authoritative teaching, whether it is attainable by direct realization, and whether it ought to be inferred. Fourth, the principle of the nature of things: toward the nature of things established truly, as the several dharmas truly are — the nature of things hard to conceive, the nature of things that abides — one should give rise to conviction, and should not deliberate, should not discriminate.
This insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters, together with the foregoing three gateways of insight, gathers in all insight altogether.
Question: for what reason is this insight differentiated-by-six-matters set up?
Answer: it is set up in dependence on the "three cognitions." Which three cognitions? First, the cognition of word-meaning; second, the cognition of the bounds of the thing; third, the cognition of things-as-they-are. Because one investigates "meaning," the cognition of word-meaning arises; because one investigates "thing" and "particular-mark," the cognition of the bounds of the thing arises; because one investigates "common-mark, class, time, and principle," the cognition of things-as-they-are arises. The field known to one who cultivates yoga is only this much — namely word-meaning, together with the extent-of-being and the way-of-being of the thing-to-be-known.
The Object-of-Six-Matters Applied to the Five Purifying Practices (1) The Contemplation of the Impure
What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of the impure?
Investigating meaning: in dependence on the reinforcing force of hearing and retaining the true Dharma that reinforces the impure, by an attention in accord with principle at the stage of equipoise, one understands its meaning — knowing that this impurity is truly impure, deeply to be loathed, its nature rotten and foul, malodorous, raw and rank; by these various aspects, one understands the meaning of the true Dharma formerly heard, which was spoken with reference to the several impurities.
Investigating that thing: having understood the meaning, one contemplates the impure things and sets up two divisions — inner and outer.
Investigating the particular-mark: first, toward the foul, rotten impurities within one's own inner body, one arouses resolute conviction, knowing that within the body there are hair, body-hair, and so on, spoken at length down to the membrane of the brain and the urine; and again one gathers these many impurities within the body into two elements — the earth-element and the water-element: from hair and body-hair down to feces one arouses the resolute conviction of the earth-element; from tears and sweat down to urine one arouses the resolute conviction of the water-element. This is investigating the particular-mark in dependence on the inner impurity. Again, toward the outer impure things, by the various aspects of bruised-blue and the rest one arouses resolute conviction: the corpse one contemplates, whether man or woman or neither man nor woman, whether kin or foe or neutral, whether inferior or middling or superior, whether young, middle-aged, or old. Having grasped that mark — if the death is one day past, the blood already run dry but not yet come to festering, one arouses the resolute conviction of the bruised-blue; if the death is two days past, already come to festering but not yet grown worms and maggots, one arouses the resolute conviction of the festering; if the death is seven days past, already grown worms and maggots and the body already ruined, one arouses the resolute conviction of the rotted-and-bloated; if devoured by foxes and wolves, kites and owls, eagles and vultures, crows and magpies, and starving dogs, one arouses the resolute conviction of the devoured; once devoured, the skin, flesh, and blood exhausted, only sinews binding the bones, one arouses the resolute conviction of the discolored-red; or devoured, the limbs and joints parted and scattered here and there (some with flesh, some without flesh, some with a little flesh remaining), one arouses the resolute conviction of the scattered; if the bone-joints are parted and scattered, the hand-bones, foot-bones, knee-bones, thigh-bones, hip-bones, shoulder-bones, arm-bones, spine-bones, the ring of the jaw, the garland of teeth, and the skull each in a separate place, one arouses the resolute conviction of the bone; if one reflects that the skeleton is joined together and not scattered, grasping only the coarse mark and not grasping the bending of the limbs and joints in detail, then one arouses the resolute conviction of the chain; if one grasps the bending of the limbs and joints in detail, then one arouses the resolute conviction of the bone-chain. Again there are two chains: first, the frame-chain (from the blood-cauldron and the spine-bones down to the seat of the skull); second, the limb-chain (the shoulder-bones and the rest linked in a chain, the thigh- and calf-bones and the rest linked in a chain); the frame-chain is named "chain," and the limb-chain is named "bone-chain." Again there are two ways of grasping the mark of a bone-chain: first, grasping the mere designation (the mark of a bone-chain made of painted work, wood, stone, clay, and the like); second, grasping the true mark of a bone-chain — when reflecting on the mark of the merely-designated bone-chain, it is only named arousing the resolute conviction of the "chain," and is not named bone-chain; when reflecting on the mark of the true bone-chain, only then is it named arousing the resolute conviction of the "bone-chain." Again, the mark of this outer derived matter has three kinds of alteration-and-ruin: first, alteration of itself (from bruised-blue down to rotted-and-bloated); second, alteration by another (from devoured down to scattered); third, alteration of both kinds (whether bone, or chain, or bone-chain). To be able thus to know truly the mark of the outer impurity is named investigating the particular-mark of all the outer impurities.
Investigating the common-mark: the mark of the fine outer matter of the inner body has not yet altered, while the mark of the impure matter of the outer body has already altered; by the "sameness of the nature of things, the resemblance of the nature of things" of the impure matter-mark of the inner body, one arouses resolute conviction, and is able to know oneself: "the mark of my own fine matter also has the same nature of things as this; and if there are sentient beings possessed of such a mark of fine matter, the mark of their fine matter also has the same nature of things as this — like the mark of the outer impure matter." This is named investigating the common-mark of the impure.
Investigating that class: one reflects thus — if I do not truly know the impure nature of those several fine-matter marks, and arouse greed and desire toward the several fine-matter marks inner and outer, this is upside-down, belongs to the dark class, is a dharma of strife, has suffering, has harm, has all disasters and calamities, has all-round burning distress, and by this cause and condition gives rise to the various distresses of future birth, aging, sickness, death, sorrow, lament, grief, and pain; if I truly contemplate along with the impure nature of those several fine-matter marks, then I am not upside-down, belong to the white class, am a dharma without strife, without suffering and without harm, spoken at length down to being able to extinguish the future birth, aging, sickness, death, and on to the distresses. The several dark-class things I ought now not to endure, and ought to sever and expel; the several white-class things, unarisen in me, I ought to make arise, and once arisen, make abide, grow, and become vast and great. This is named investigating that class.
Investigating that time: one reflects thus — the several fine-matter marks I have within are in the present age, and the impure matter-marks I have without are also in the present age; the marks that were once fine in the past age, though they had a fine mark in the past, are now in the present already various impurities; the seemingly-fine matter-marks I have in the present age, though they have a fine mark now in the present, will by the future age certainly not remain "unaltered and pure" like the outer impure matter now present — that is impossible. This matter-body of mine, past, future, and present, once had such a mark, will have such a mark, and now has such a mark — nothing but such an impure nature of things. This is named investigating that time.
Investigating that principle: one reflects thus — whether inner or outer, no "self or sentient being" is to be found that could be called pure or impure; there is only the matter-mark, only the bodily shape, within which by conventional supposition and designation one speaks of it as pure or impure. Again, as it is said: lifespan, warmth, and consciousness, when the body is cast off, then depart from their holding-and-grasping and lie down, without thought, like wood; and once dead and gone, the successive phases of alteration-and-ruin can be known (bruised-blue and the rest down to the bone-chain). Now this body of mine is drawn forth by former karma and afflictions, born of the impure union of father and mother, and grown by the nourishment of rice-gruel and the like; by this cause, this condition, this dependence, though for a while it has a seemingly-knowable fine matter-mark, yet within the inner body, whether inner or outer, at all times the various impurities are all completely filled. This is named investigating that principle in dependence on the principle of reliance — the conventional, the ultimate, and cause-and-condition. Again one reflects thus — if one can well cultivate, well practice, and well much-cultivate this impurity, one is able to sever desire and greed; this desire and greed most certainly ought to be severed. This is named investigating that principle in dependence on the principle of function. Again one reflects thus — that "if one well cultivates, well practices, and well much-cultivates the impure, one is able to sever desire and greed," as the World-Honored One said, is the means of authoritative teaching; that I too, within, am able myself to see directly the several impurities, and, by attending, reflecting, and cultivating thus and thus, am able thus to make desire-and-greed's enwrapment, unarisen, not arise, and once arisen, expel it, is the means of direct realization; the means of inference too is to be had — one reflects thus, "how is it that now, by attending and reflecting on the counteracting dharma, upon the object-field that counteracts, the affliction is to arise?" This is named investigating that principle in dependence on the principle of proof. Again one reflects thus — that this dharma is established the nature of things, the nature of things hard to conceive, the nature of things that abides — namely that cultivating the impure can serve as the severing counteragent of desire-and-greed — ought not to be deliberated, ought not to be discriminated, and ought only to be met with conviction. This is named investigating that principle in dependence on the principle of the nature of things.
This is named the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of the impure.
The Object-of-Six-Matters Applied to the Five Purifying Practices (2) The Contemplation of Loving-Kindness
What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of loving-kindness?
Investigating meaning: in dependence on the reinforcing force of hearing and retaining the true Dharma that reinforces loving-kindness, by the inclination of "wishing to benefit and bring ease," one attends to giving happiness to the several sentient beings and arouses resolute conviction — this is the mark of loving-kindness; to be able thus to understand its meaning is named investigating the meaning of the several loving-kindnesses.
Investigating thing: having understood the meaning, one is able to discern this as the friend-class, this as the foe-class, this as the neutral-class; all these classes are subsumed under the continua of others, and toward them one arouses "resolute conviction of the outer thing"; again, the friend-class is named the inner thing, and the foe- and neutral-classes are named the outer thing. This is named investigating the thing of the several loving-kindnesses.
Investigating the particular-mark: one discerns whether these three classes are "without suffering and without happiness, wishing to seek happiness," and wishes them to gain happiness — the one with a mark of benefit is named the friend-class, the one with a mark of no-benefit is named the foe-class, the one with a mark contrary to both is named the neutral-class. If these three classes are without suffering and happiness and wish to seek happiness, then as to the mind wishing to seek happiness there are three differences: first, wishing to seek the various happinesses of the desire realm; second, wishing to seek the various happinesses of the form realm that have joy and buoyant delight; third, wishing to seek the various happinesses apart from joy; if one is lacking in desire-happiness, one wishes them all to gain blameless desire-happiness, and if one is in any way lacking in the happinesses that have joy and apart from joy, likewise. This is named investigating the particular-mark of loving-kindness.
Investigating the common-mark: one considers with care and discerns — toward the three classes of friend, foe, and neutral, I should in all cases arouse a "mind of resemblance, a mind of evenness." Why? For me to attend to giving happiness to the friend-class is not hard, to give happiness to the neutral-class is also not very hard, and to give happiness to the foe-class is hardest; toward the foe-class I should still attend and wish to give it happiness — how much more the friend-class and the neutral-class, and not give them happiness? Why? For herein there is fundamentally no reviler and reviled, no angered and angerer, no mocker and mocked, no striker and struck; there is only sound, only names; and again this body of mine, arising as it does, is made of the coarse and heavy four great elements that have matter, and wherever it dwells is oppressed by such contacts (there are roughly two contacts: the contact of sound, and the contact of hand, foot, clod, blade, staff, and the like), and this body and these contacts are both impermanent, and the one who does me no benefit is also impermanent; and again all sentient beings have such dharmas as birth, aging, sickness, and death, and are by their very nature suffering — I ought not, upon the body of a sentient being by nature suffering, to add still more suffering and not give it happiness; and again I ought not to fail to be a good friend to a foe, nor to fail to gather all sentient beings as my own self; and again the World-Honored One said, "I do not see a single such kind of sentient being that, throughout the beginningless ages passing through birth-and-death, long turning in the round, has not at some time been to one another father, mother, brother, sister, preceptor, teacher, or one otherwise venerable or seemingly-venerable," and by this cause and condition every one of the foe-class is nothing but my friend-class; and again the foe- and friend-classes have nothing fixed and truly to be found — the friend-class at another time turns into the foe-class, the foe-class at another time turns into the friend-class, and so all are without fixity. Therefore I ought now, toward all sentient beings, to arouse a mind of evenness and a view of evenness, and to arouse a resembling inclination-to-benefit, inclination-to-ease, and resolute conviction of giving happiness. This is named investigating the common-mark of loving-kindness.
Investigating class: one considers with care and discerns — if I arouse anger and ill-will toward the one who does me no benefit, this is upside-down, belongs to the dark class, is a dharma of strife (spoken at length as before); if I do not arouse anger and ill-will, this is not upside-down, belongs to the white class, is a dharma without strife (spoken at length as before). This is named investigating the dark class and the white class of loving-kindness.
Investigating time: one considers with care and discerns — the sentient beings of the past age who sought and wished to gain happiness have all passed away, so how shall I be able to give them happiness? The sentient beings of the present age, I now wish that, throughout the whole future age, at all times they may constantly receive happiness. This is named investigating the times of the several loving-kindnesses.
Investigating principle: one considers with care and discerns — herein there is no "self or sentient being, no one seeking happiness, no one giving happiness"; there are only the several aggregates, only the several formations, within which by conventional supposition and designation one speaks of this one seeking happiness, this one giving happiness; and again those several formations have karma, affliction, and the rest as their cause and condition. This is named investigating loving-kindness in dependence on the principle of reliance. If, by well cultivating, well practicing, and well much-cultivating loving-kindness, one is able to sever anger and ill-will, this is named investigating loving-kindness in dependence on the principle of function. That such a meaning has the means of authoritative teaching, that my own inner knowledge-and-vision turns present and is to be had, and that the means of inference too is to be had, is named investigating loving-kindness in dependence on the principle of proof. And again, that this dharma is established the nature of things, the nature of things hard to conceive, the nature of things that abides — namely that cultivating loving-kindness can sever anger and ill-will — ought not to be deliberated, ought not to be discriminated, and ought to be met with resolute conviction, is named investigating loving-kindness in dependence on the principle of the nature of things.
This is named the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of loving-kindness.
〔Within the Basic Section, the Śrāvaka Stage, the thirteenth, the third yoga-station, part two.〕
The Object-of-Six-Matters Applied to the Five Purifying Practices (3) The Contemplation of Dependent Origination
What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of dependent origination?
Investigating meaning: in dependence on the reinforcing force of hearing and retaining the true Dharma that reinforces the conditioned nature and dependent origination, one is able to know correctly that "because such-and-such dharmas arise, such-and-such dharmas arise; because such-and-such dharmas cease, such-and-such dharmas cease"; herein there is no "sovereign lord, maker, producer, or transformer" that could fashion the several dharmas, nor any "intrinsic self, person, or intermediate transformer" that could transform the several dharmas. To be able to know such meanings is named investigating the meaning of the several dependent originations.
Investigating thing: one considers with care and discerns the twelve members of existence, whether inner or outer, and arouses resolute conviction. This is named investigating the thing of the several dependent originations.
Investigating the particular-mark: one considers with care and discerns the "ignorance (avidyā) about the prior bound, ignorance about the later bound" of the member of ignorance and the rest (spoken at length as before in the analysis of the members of dependent origination). This is named investigating the particular-mark of dependent origination.
Investigating the common-mark: one considers with care and discerns — all these conditionally-arisen formations are, without exception, non-existent before and existent now, existent and then dispersed and ceased, and so before and after they are all impermanent; because they all have the dharmas of birth, aging, sickness, and death, their nature is suffering; because they are not sovereign, and because the intermediate person is not to be found, therefore their nature is empty and without self. This is named investigating the common-mark of dependent origination.
Investigating class: one considers with care and discerns — if I, toward the true principle of those impermanent, suffering, empty, and selfless formations, give rise to confusion, this is upside-down, belongs to the dark class (spoken at length as before); if I am not confused, this is not upside-down, belongs to the white class (spoken at length as before). This is named investigating the class of the several dependent originations.
Investigating time: one considers with care and discerns — the self-body gained in the past age had no constancy of the normal, and so abided; the self-body gained in the present age has no constancy of the normal, and so now abides; the self-body to be gained in the future age will have no constancy of the normal, and so will abide. This is named investigating the time of the several dependent originations.
Investigating principle: one considers with care and discerns — there are only the several karmas and the fruits of maturation, within which no "master and controller" is to be found (namely a maker and an experiencer); there is only the conventional supposition established upon dharmas — within "ignorance conditioning formations down to birth conditioning aging-and-death" one arouses a false mark and by designation speaks of a maker and an experiencer, having such a name, such a kind, such a clan, such food and drink, experiencing such suffering or such happiness, such long life, such long abiding, and such reaching to the very bound of the lifespan. And again herein there are two kinds of fruit and two kinds of cause: the two kinds of fruit — first, the self-body fruit (the six bases and the rest, the dharmas born of maturation in this present life); second, the enjoyed-realm fruit (the several feelings born of the six contacts, arisen by the reinforcing force of agreeable and disagreeable karma); the two kinds of cause — first, the drawing-in cause; second, the giving-rise cause. The drawing-in cause: toward the two fruits one arouses folly; with folly preceding, one produces meritorious, non-meritorious, and imperturbable formations; the formations are able to appropriate the consciousness of the later existence and make the sprouts of existence arise — that is, they are able to appropriate the seeds of consciousness and make them, turn by turn, appropriate the seeds of the name-and-form, the seeds of the six bases, and the seeds of contact-and-feeling of the later existence; in order that the consciousness, name-and-form, six bases, contact, and feeling subsumed under the future birth-member may in sequence come to arise, one now first appropriates the seeds of those dharmas. All this is named the drawing-in cause. The giving-rise cause: when experiencing the several feelings born of the ignorance-contact, by "object-craving" one produces "craving for the later existence," and the several graspings that are able to appropriate the craving-portion and the folly-portion; by this force, this capacity, one moistens the karma-seeds and makes them able to yield the several fruits of maturation. All this is named the giving-rise cause. By the reinforcing force of these two causes, one is then pursued by the three sufferings and gathers together the whole great mass of nothing but suffering. This is named investigating the whole principle of dependent origination in dependence on the principle of reliance. And again one considers with care and discerns that, by well cultivating, well practicing, and well much-cultivating this contemplation of the conditioned nature and dependent origination, one is able to sever folly; and again one considers with care and discerns that this principle has the means of authoritative teaching, has inner direct realization, has the dharma of inference, and also has such meanings as being established the nature of things — this is named investigating the whole principle of dependent origination in dependence on the principle of function, the principle of proof, and the principle of the nature of things.
This is named the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of dependent origination.
The Object-of-Six-Matters Applied to the Five Purifying Practices (4) The Contemplation of the Differentiation of Elements
What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of the differentiation of elements?
Investigating meaning: in dependence on the reinforcing force of hearing and retaining the true Dharma that reinforces the differentiation of elements, one is able to understand correctly the meaning of all "element" — namely the sense of lineage, the sense of seed, the sense of cause, and the sense of nature — such is the sense of "element." This is named investigating the meaning of element.
Investigating thing: one correctly investigates the inner and outer differentiation of the six elements, earth and the rest, and arouses resolute conviction. This is named investigating the thing of element.
Investigating the particular-mark: one correctly investigates — earth is the mark of hardness, 〔water is the mark of moisture, fire is the mark of warmth,〕 and on to wind being the mark of lightness-and-motion, consciousness being the mark of discerning, and the space-element being the mark of empty space, the mark of pervading matter, the mark of no obstruction. This is named investigating the particular-mark of the several elements.
Investigating the common-mark: one correctly investigates — all these elements, to say it in brief, are impermanent and on to without self. This is named investigating the common-mark of the several elements.
Investigating class: one correctly investigates "the differentiated nature of the elements within the one lumped mark" — one who does not know this, and toward the body composed of the differentiation of elements arouses lofty conceit, is upside-down, belongs to the dark class (spoken at length as before); the one contrary to the above is not upside-down, belongs to the white class (spoken at length as before). This is named investigating the class of element.
Investigating time: one correctly investigates — that in the past, future, and present age, with the six elements as condition, one gains entry into the mother's womb. This is named investigating the time of element.
Investigating principle: one correctly investigates — as grass, wood, and the rest, a concurrence of many conditions ringing round empty space, are reckoned 〔and counted〕 as a "house," so, because the six elements serve as support, sinew, bone, blood, and flesh, a concurrence of many conditions ringing round empty space, by conventional supposition and the several suppositions and designation, are reckoned as a "body"; and again the several karmas and afflictions of former lives, and one's own seeds, serve as cause and condition. This is named investigating the principle of the differentiation of the several elements in dependence on the principle of reliance. And again one correctly investigates that, by well cultivating, well practicing, and well much-cultivating the contemplation of the differentiation of elements, one is able to sever conceit; and again one correctly investigates that this principle has the means of authoritative teaching, has inner realization-knowledge, has the dharma of inference, and has the establishing of the nature of things, the nature of things hard to conceive, the nature of things that abides — this is named investigating the principle of the differentiation of the several elements in dependence on the principle of function, the principle of proof, and the principle of the nature of things.
This is named the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of the differentiation of elements.
The Object-of-Six-Matters Applied to the Five Purifying Practices (5) Mindfulness of In-and-Out Breathing
What is the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates mindfulness of in-and-out breathing 〔the mindfulness of the in-breath and the out-breath〕?
Investigating meaning: in dependence on the reinforcing force of hearing and retaining the true Dharma that reinforces mindfulness of in-and-out breathing, one is able to know correctly that "binding the mind to the object-field of the in- and out-breath, penetrating it, and keeping it unforgotten and clearly noted" is the meaning of mindfulness of in-and-out breathing. This is named investigating its meaning.
Investigating thing: one correctly investigates — the in-breath and out-breath are to be found within, and because they are bound to the body and subsumed under the outer bases, they have an inner and outer differentiation. This is named investigating its thing.
Investigating the particular-mark: one correctly investigates — the in-breath is twofold and the out-breath is twofold: the wind entering within is named the in-breath, and the wind going out is named the out-breath; and one also knows correctly that this is a long in-breath and out-breath, that this is a short in-breath and out-breath, and that the breath pervades every part of the body. This is named investigating the particular-mark of the several breaths.
Investigating the common-mark: one correctly investigates — once the in-breath has ceased there is the arising of an out-breath, and once the out-breath has ceased there is the arising of an in-breath; the turning of the in- and out-breath is bound to the life-faculty and the conscious body, and this in- and out-breath and its support are all impermanent. This is named investigating the common-mark of the several breaths.
Investigating class: one correctly investigates — if, with regard to the in- and out-breath, one does not abide in right mindfulness and, by evil discursive thoughts, has the mind disturbed, this is upside-down, belongs to the dark class, is a dharma of strife (spoken at length as before); the one contrary to the above is not upside-down, belongs to the white class, is a dharma without strife (spoken at length as before). This is named investigating its class.
Investigating time: one correctly investigates — that in the past, future, and present age the turning of the in- and out-breath is bound to body and mind, and body and mind are bound to the in- and out-breath. This is named investigating its time.
Investigating principle: one correctly investigates — herein there is no "holder of the in-breath, holder of the out-breath" that would make the in- and out-breath bound to it; there is only, upon the several formations arisen from causes and conditions, an arousing of conventional supposition and, by designation, the speaking of there being one able to hold the in- and out-breath. This is named investigating its principle in dependence on the principle of reliance. And again one correctly investigates that, by well cultivating, well practicing, and well much-cultivating mindfulness of in-and-out breathing, one is able to sever discursive thought; and again one correctly investigates that this principle has the means of authoritative teaching, has inner realization-knowledge, has the dharma of inference, and has the establishing of the nature of things, the nature of things hard to conceive, the nature of things that abides, which ought not to be deliberated, ought not to be discriminated, and ought only to be met with conviction — this is named investigating its principle in dependence on the principle of function, the principle of proof, and the principle of the nature of things.
This is named the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters for one who diligently cultivates mindfulness of in-and-out breathing.
The Joined Operation of Tranquillity and Insight · The Object of Skill and the Object That Purifies the Afflictions Spoken of Later
Thus, in dependence on the object of the purifying practices, having investigated the differentiated contemplation of the six matters, one again and again stills the mind within, and again and again examines with care, with the practice of superior contemplation, what one has investigated: because he takes tranquillity as his support, he makes insight swiftly gain purity; and because he takes insight as his support, he makes tranquillity grow and become vast and great. As for investigating the insight of the object-differentiated-by-six-matters in dependence on the object of skill and the object that purifies the afflictions, I shall speak of it in its own place 〔in the text below〕.
教學弧:前行立竟,這一葉正式教「修定」——心怎麼一步步繫住(止),又怎麼從繫住轉成觀照(觀)。止有一張全圖:九種心住,從硬把心拉回來,走到任運不費力;六種力是推手,四種作意是用心的鬆緊。觀則有四種毘鉢舍那、六事差別所緣,一帖一帖施於五停心。眼,在最後一層:聲聞所修止觀的「所緣影像」,《解深密經》一句判破——影像唯是識所現。聲聞地的心一境性,經自指向唯識。這是本葉與安立段(眼·輕)最大的不同:此葉義眼重。
心怎麼才算「定」?
先界定。什麼是「心一境性」?不是把一個念頭釘死不動,而是「數數隨念同分所緣,流注、無罪適悅相應,令心相續」——一次又一次地隨念同一類所緣,心像水一樣相續流注、不夾雜罪染、與一種安隱的適悅相應。「同分所緣」不是只緣一個點,而是『所知事相似的品類』(眾多而同類),緣這同類境令心正行,就名為定。
這心一境性,往兩邊開:在九種心住裡的,是奢摩他(止)品;在四種慧行裡的,是毘鉢舍那(觀)品。一葉之中,止觀俱備。
九個階位:從硬拉回來,到任運不費力
九種心住,是止的一張全程圖。別把它當九個並列的名相,它是一條心被馴服的線:
- 內住——最初,把心從外面的色聲香味觸一把收回來,繫在內裡。這是硬拉。
- 等住——剛繫的心還麁動,用「相續」「澄淨」兩種方便,把它挫得微細、遍攝令住。
- 安住——一失念又散出去了,再收回來、安置內境。
- 近住——靠著數數念住、一次次作意把心內住,不讓它遠走。
- 調順——色聲香味觸、貪瞋癡男女這些相最會勾人散亂;先把這些相看成「過患」,一起過患想,心就折挫不流散了。
- 寂靜——欲、恚、害等惡尋思,貪欲蓋等隨煩惱來擾動;同樣取作過患想,把心止息住。
- 最極寂靜——縱一時失念、那二種(惡尋思、隨煩惱)暫一冒頭,立刻不忍受、隨即「斷滅、除遣、變吐」。
- 專注一趣——到這裡,有加行有功用,但已無缺、無間,三摩地相續而住。
- 等持——數數修習成了因緣,得「無加行、無功用、任運而轉」之道;不靠使勁,心自相續、無散亂。
九階看下來,是一條「從使勁到任運」的路:前頭要硬拉、要挫、要一再收回;中段靠過患想壓住散亂與煩惱;末了水到渠成,心自己住下來。
推著這九階走的,是六種力——聽聞、思惟、憶念、正知、精進、串習。古德把力與住配得清楚:聽聞、思惟二力,成就內住、等住(最初聞思立心於內);憶念力,成就安住、近住(一失念就靠憶念收回);正知力,成就調順、寂靜(靠正知調息諸相煩惱);精進力,成就最極寂靜、專注一趣(暫起即斷靠精進);串習力,成就等持(遁倫·窺基)。
而用心的鬆緊,是四種作意:內住等住要「力勵運轉」(使勁);安住到最極寂靜是「有間缺運轉」(仍有斷續);專注一趣是「無間缺運轉」(不再斷續);等持是「無功用運轉」(任運不費力)。用心由緊到鬆,正配那條從使勁到任運的路。古德並指出:這同樣四作意,到修觀時也用得上,所以四作意「通止觀二品」(遁倫)。
〔附:古德於九住,唯揀「等住(離沈浮)·遍住(審悉遍觀)·澄淨(離亂寂靜)·最寂淨(失念欻起尋即除遣)」數名申釋,餘準論文自說。又窺基提醒:這九住「未必是定中心,但住一緣即是」——最初歛心未必就得定,故說「奢摩他品類」,非個個都已是奢摩他。〕
止轉成觀:四種毘鉢舍那,六事為門
定立住了,就轉修觀。四種毘鉢舍那(觀的四種慧行)依止內心奢摩他而起:能正思擇「盡所有性」(一切事相的範圍)、最極思擇「如所有性」(事相的真實理)、周遍尋思(取相分別)、周遍伺察(審諦推求)。
觀又有「三門」(唯隨相行→隨尋思行→隨伺察行,由淺入深)與「六事差別所緣」。六事是觀的六個著眼點——義(語有何義)、事(內外二事)、相(自相、共相)、品(黑品過患、白品功德)、時(過去未來現在)、理(觀待、作用、證成、法爾四道理,證成下又開至教、比度、現證三量)。論本自說:這六事其實是「三覺」開出來的——尋思義起語義覺,尋思事與自相起事邊際覺,尋思共相品時理起如實覺;修瑜伽師所知的境界,就這麼多:語義,加上所知事的盡所有性、如所有性。
一帖一帖配五停心
六事不是空講,論把它一一施於五停心觀——五帖對著五種煩惱的藥:
- 不淨觀治貪。最有畫面的就在這裡:觀死屍由新到壞,論排出九個變壞相——青瘀、膿爛、爛壞胮脹、食噉、異赤、分散,到骨、鎖、骨鎖。一具身軀從血流盡到唯餘白骨連鎖,貪欲對著這條路看下去,就淡了。古德順手點明「惡臭」「生臭」之別:變壞才臭的像糞穢,纔生就臭的像薤、蒜、韮䔉(遁倫·窺基)。
- 慈愍觀治瞋。把眾生分親、怨、中庸三品,都願他得樂——對親不難、對怨最難;可是「都無能罵所罵、能打所打,唯有音聲、唯有名字」,且無始來怨家無不曾做過我的父母師長,怨親本無定(親會轉怨、怨會轉親),所以該對一切起「平等性心」。
- 緣起觀治癡。觀十二有支「此生故彼生」,其中無作者、無受者,唯有二因(牽引因、生起因)牽出二果(自體果、受用境界果),招集純大苦蘊。
- 界差別觀治慢。把這一合相的身拆成六界(地堅、水濕、火煖、風動、空無礙、識了別),知道「身」只是六界眾緣圍遶虛空、假名為身,高慢就立不住。
- 阿那波那念(數息)治尋思。繫心入出息,知長知短知遍身,知入出息繫屬身心、皆是無常,散動的尋思就收住了。
每一帖都走完六事(義、事、相、品、時、理),這是論教觀的一貫格式。
★所緣影像唯是識:聲聞止觀的唯識結穴
到這裡要點出本葉最重的一眼。修觀時,心所緣的是個「影像」(定中現起的境相)。這影像是什麼?《解深密經·分別瑜伽品》裡,慈氏菩薩問、世尊答,一句判破——
「我說識所緣,唯識所現故。」(解深密)
世尊更打一個鏡喻:
「如依善瑩清淨鏡面,以質為緣還見本質,而謂我今見於影像。」(解深密)
像照著一面磨得極亮的鏡子,鏡裡現出的「影像」其實就是那本質所現,並非另有一物;修觀者所緣的定中影像,也「與此心無異,由彼影像唯是識故」。所以經接著說,心一境性正是「通達三摩地所行影像,唯是其識;或通達此已,復思惟如性」(解深密)——先通達影像唯識(這是「盡所有性」那一層),再思惟真如(這是「如所有性」那一層)。本葉「能正思擇盡所有性、最極思擇如所有性」,經就這樣讀成了唯識的兩層。
這一眼要緊:聲聞地所修的止觀,所緣影像經自判為唯識所現。聲聞修的止觀,與唯識義在此相通——這是經內的樞紐,不是後人附會(此據《解深密》經本·佛說玄奘譯,非現代之說)。
承衍
修到末了,止觀不是兩件事。論說:依奢摩他為依止,令毘鉢舍那速得清淨;又依毘鉢舍那為依止,令奢摩他增長廣大——止觀雙運、彼此增益。
本葉的六事所緣只施於「淨行五停心」;至於依「善巧所緣」(蘊界處緣起處非處)、「淨惑所緣」(世間出世間道)也走六事,論明說「於其自處我後當說」,指到後文。而這一葉的九種心住,更是後出慈氏無著諸論(如《大乘莊嚴經論》《攝大乘論》系)所承用的「九種心住」之所本——一張聲聞止的全圖,後來成了大乘止觀共依的階梯。聲聞修瑜伽的止觀體相,到此圓備;下一葉,便要講修中如何加行、如何淨障了。
Teaching arc: with the preliminaries established, this leaf takes up in earnest the teaching of "cultivating meditation" — how the mind is bound in place step by step (tranquillity), and how, from being bound, it turns into contemplative illumination (insight). Tranquillity has one full chart: the nine mental abidings, from hauling the mind back by force to running on effortlessly of itself; the six forces are what push it along, and the four attentions are the tightening and loosening of the mind's effort. Insight then has the four insights and the object-differentiated-by-six-matters, applied dose by dose to the five stilling contemplations. The eye is in the last layer: the "object-image" that the tranquillity-and-insight cultivated by the śrāvaka rests upon — the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra judges it in a single stroke — the image is nothing but the appearance of consciousness. The one-pointedness of mind of the Śrāvaka Stage is pointed by the sūtra itself toward Consciousness-Only. This is the greatest difference between this leaf and the establishing passage (whose eye is light): on this leaf the doctrinal eye is heavy.
What Counts as "Meditation" at All?
First the definition. What is "one-pointedness of mind"? It is not nailing a single thought fast and unmoving, but "repeatedly recollecting an object of the same class, flowing on, consorting with a blameless ease, keeping the mind in unbroken continuity" — again and again recollecting an object of one same class, the mind flowing on continuously like water, unmixed with any taint of fault, consorting with a certain settled ease. "An object of the same class" is not the grasping of one single point, but "a class resembling the thing-to-be-known" (many, yet of one same class); to make the mind operate rightly with this same-class object as its field is what is named meditation.
This one-pointedness of mind opens toward both sides: the one within the nine mental abidings is the tranquillity (śamatha) division; the one within the four wisdom-practices is the insight (vipaśyanā) division. Within one leaf, both tranquillity and insight are complete.
The Nine Stations: From Hauling the Mind Back by Force to Running On Effortlessly
The nine mental abidings are one full chart of the whole course of tranquillity. Do not take them for nine coordinate names set side by side; they are a single line along which the mind is broken in:
- Inner abiding — at the first, the mind is gathered back in one grip from the outer colors, sounds, smells, tastes, and touches, and bound within. This is hauling by force.
- Even abiding — the just-bound mind is still coarse and restless; by the two expedients of "continuity" and "clarifying," it is ground fine and gathered all round into abiding.
- Settled abiding — once mindfulness is lost it scatters out again, and one gathers it back and settles it upon the inner object.
- Close abiding — relying on repeated abiding in mindfulness, attending again and again so that the mind abides within, and not letting it wander off far.
- Tamed — the marks of color, sound, smell, taste, and touch, and of greed, hatred, delusion, man and woman, are what most hook the mind into scattering; first take these marks as "fault," and once the thought of fault is roused, the mind is broken and no longer flows loose.
- Stilled — evil thoughts of desire, ill-will, and harm, and the secondary afflictions such as the hindrance of covetousness, come to stir it; likewise take them as the thought of fault, and the mind is brought to rest.
- Utterly stilled — should mindfulness be lost for a moment and those two (evil thoughts, secondary afflictions) briefly poke up, at once they are not endured but "severed, expelled, vomited out."
- Single-pointed absorption — reaching here, there is still exertion and effort, but already the meditative equipoise abides continuously, without gap and without break.
- Holding-in-equipoise — repeated cultivation has become the cause and condition, and one attains the path that is "without exertion, without effort, running on of itself"; not relying on force, the mind continues of itself, unscattered.
Looked at across the nine stations, this is a road "from exertion to spontaneity": at the head one must haul by force, grind, and again and again gather back; in the middle one holds down scattering and affliction by the thought of fault; at the last it comes of itself, and the mind abides down of its own accord.
What pushes these nine stations along is the six forces — hearing, reflection, recollection, full awareness, vigor, and repeated practice. The ancients match force to abiding cleanly: the two forces of hearing and reflection accomplish inner abiding and even abiding (at the first, hearing and reflecting set the mind up within); the force of recollection accomplishes settled abiding and close abiding (once mindfulness is lost, one relies on recollection to gather it back); the force of full awareness accomplishes tamed and stilled (relying on full awareness to regulate the marks and afflictions); the force of vigor accomplishes utterly stilled and single-pointed absorption (severing what momentarily rises relies on vigor); the force of repeated practice accomplishes holding-in-equipoise 〔Dunlun · Kuiji〕.
And the tightening and loosening of the mind's effort is the four attentions: inner and even abiding require "striving-operation" (exertion); from settled abiding to utterly stilled is "interrupted-operation" (there is still gap and break); single-pointed absorption is "uninterrupted-operation" (no more gap and break); holding-in-equipoise is "effortless-operation" (running on of itself without strain). The effort goes from tight to loose, matching exactly that road from exertion to spontaneity. The ancients further point out that these same four attentions serve when one comes to cultivate insight, so the four attentions "run through both the tranquillity and insight divisions" 〔Dunlun〕.
〔Appended: of the nine abidings, the ancients gloss only a few names — "even abiding (apart from sinking and floating) · all-round abiding (examining and contemplating all round) · clarifying (apart from disorder, stilled) · utterly stilled (mindfulness lost, something suddenly rises, and is at once expelled)" — the rest following the treatise's own statement. Kuiji also cautions: these nine abidings "are not necessarily the mind within meditative equipoise, but abiding upon a single object is just this" — at the first, gathering the mind is not necessarily attaining meditative equipoise, and so it is said to be "of the tranquillity kind," not that every one is already tranquillity.〕
Tranquillity Turns into Insight: The Four Insights, the Six Matters as Gateway
Once meditation is set and settled, one turns to cultivating insight. The four insights (the four wisdom-practices of contemplation) arise resting upon inner tranquillity: correctly discerning the "extent-of-being" (the range of all things and their marks) · utterly discerning the "way-of-being" (the true principle of things and marks) · thorough investigation (grasping the mark, discerning) · thorough examination (probing and searching with care).
Insight further has "three gateways" (following-the-mark-only → following-investigation → following-examination, from shallow to deep) and the "object-differentiated-by-six-matters." The six matters are the six points of focus of insight — meaning (what meaning a word has) · thing (the two things, inner and outer) · mark (the particular-mark, the common-mark) · class (the fault of the dark class, the merit of the white class) · time (past, future, present) · principle (the four principles of reliance, function, proof, and the nature of things; under proof there open further the three means: authoritative teaching, inference, and direct realization). The treatise says of itself: these six matters are in fact opened out from the "three cognitions" — discerning meaning rouses the cognition of word-meaning, discerning the thing and the particular-mark rouses the cognition of the bounds of the thing, discerning the common-mark, class, time, and principle rouses the cognition of things-as-they-are; the field known to one who cultivates yoga is just this much: word-meaning, together with the extent-of-being and the way-of-being of the thing-to-be-known.
Dose by Dose, Matched to the Five Stilling Contemplations
The six matters are not spoken in a void; the treatise applies them one by one to the five stilling contemplations — five doses against five kinds of affliction:
- The contemplation of the impure remedies desire. The most vivid part is right here: contemplating a corpse from fresh to ruined, the treatise sets out nine marks of decay — bruised-blue, festering, rotted-and-bloated, devoured, the discolored-red, scattered, then bone, chain, bone-chain. One body, from its blood run dry to nothing but a white bone-chain — let desire look down this road, and it thins. In passing the ancients point out the difference between "malodor" and "raw stink": what stinks only once it has decayed is like dung and filth; what stinks the moment it is born is like scallion, garlic, leek, and shallot 〔Dunlun · Kuiji〕.
- The contemplation of loving-kindness remedies hatred. It divides beings into three classes — friend, foe, and neutral — and wishes them all to gain happiness; toward the friend it is not hard, toward the foe it is hardest; yet "there is no reviler and no reviled, no striker and no struck, only sound, only names," and from the beginningless past there is no foe who has not once been my father, mother, or teacher, and friend and foe are not fixed (a friend turns into a foe, a foe into a friend), so one should rouse toward all a "mind of evenness".
- The contemplation of dependent origination remedies delusion. Contemplating the twelve members, "this arising, that arises," within which there is no agent and no experiencer, only two causes (the drawing-in cause, the giving-rise cause) drawing out two fruits (the self-body fruit, the enjoyed-realm fruit), gathering together the whole great mass of nothing but suffering.
- The contemplation of the differentiation of elements remedies conceit. It takes apart this body of one lumped mark into the six elements (earth the hard, water the moist, fire the warm, wind the moving, space the unobstructing, consciousness the discerning), and knows that "body" is only the six elements, a concurrence of many conditions ringing round empty space, designated a "body"; and conceit can no longer stand.
- Mindfulness of breathing (counting the breath) remedies discursive thought. Binding the mind to the in- and out-breath, knowing it long, knowing it short, knowing it pervading the whole body, knowing that in- and out-breath are bound to body and mind and are all impermanent, the scattered, restless discursive thought is gathered in.
Each dose runs the full six matters (meaning, thing, mark, class, time, principle) — this is the consistent format in which the treatise teaches insight.
★The Object-Image Is Nothing but Consciousness: The Consciousness-Only Knot of Śrāvaka Tranquillity-and-Insight
Here we must bring out the heaviest single eye of this leaf. When cultivating insight, what the mind rests upon is an "image" (an object-mark that arises within meditation). What is this image? In the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, the Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis, the bodhisattva Maitreya asks and the World-Honored One answers, cutting through in a single stroke —
「我說識所緣,唯識所現故。」 tr. "I say that the object of consciousness is nothing but the appearance of consciousness." 〔Saṃdhinirmocana〕
The World-Honored One presses the point further with a mirror simile:
「如依善瑩清淨鏡面,以質為緣還見本質,而謂我今見於影像。」 tr. "As, in dependence on a well-burnished, clean mirror-face, with the substance as condition one sees again that very substance, and yet says, 'I now see an image.'" 〔Saṃdhinirmocana〕
Like gazing into a mirror ground to the highest polish, the "image" that appears in the mirror is in fact just the appearance of that substance, and there is no second thing there; the meditation-image that the one who cultivates insight rests upon is likewise "no different from this mind, because that image is nothing but consciousness." And so the sūtra goes on to say that one-pointedness of mind is precisely "penetrating that the image ranged over in meditative equipoise is nothing but consciousness; or, having penetrated this, further reflecting on the way-of-being" 〔Saṃdhinirmocana〕 — first penetrating that the image is nothing but consciousness (this is the "extent-of-being" layer), then reflecting on suchness (this is the "way-of-being" layer). This leaf's "correctly discerning the extent-of-being, utterly discerning the way-of-being" is thus read by the sūtra into the two layers of Consciousness-Only.
This eye is momentous: the tranquillity-and-insight cultivated by the Śrāvaka Stage — the object-image it rests upon is judged by the sūtra itself to be the appearance of consciousness. The tranquillity-and-insight that the śrāvaka cultivates communicates here with the Consciousness-Only meaning — this is a pivot within the scripture, not a later gloss forced on from outside (this rests on the Saṃdhinirmocana scriptural text · spoken by the Buddha · Xuanzang's translation · not a modern reading).
Carrying Forward
Cultivated to the last, tranquillity and insight are not two separate things. The treatise says: resting upon tranquillity, insight is swiftly purified; and resting upon insight, tranquillity grows and expands — tranquillity and insight operate jointly, each benefiting the other.
This leaf applies the object-of-six-matters only to "the five stilling contemplations of the purifying practices"; as for running the six matters upon "the object of skill" (the aggregates, elements, bases, dependent origination, and the possible-and-the-impossible) and "the object that purifies the afflictions" (the mundane and supramundane paths), the treatise says plainly, "I shall speak of these in their own place," pointing to the later section. And these nine mental abidings on this leaf are, moreover, the source of the "nine mental abidings" carried forward by the later Maitreya-Asaṅga treatises (such as the Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra and the Mahāyānasaṃgraha lineage) — one full chart of śrāvaka tranquillity, which became the ladder relied upon in common by the Mahāyāna's own tranquillity-and-insight. The essential form of the tranquillity-and-insight that the śrāvaka cultivates in yoga is here complete; on the next leaf, we come to how, within cultivation, one intensifies practice and purifies the obstacles.
考據Apparatus
本子古德二態:遁倫《論記》卷七之下〔T42 0462c28–0465a13〕逐科詳釋(心一境性科判·六力配九住〔三說料簡〕·四作意配七作意·四毘鉢舍那三門六事·三覺對應·不淨/緣起/界/阿那波那各觀·止觀雙運結·並引泰〔神泰〕·基〔窺基〕·備〔玄範〕·三藏〔玄奘〕);窺基《略纂》卷八(論本卷30)〔T43 0118b04–0119b18〕釋心一境性·九住通定散·六力配九住·法爾三法性·不淨觀(緣起/界/阿那波那於卷30 不重釋)。最勝子《釋》T1580 無逐句專釋,唯序釋中一語明「奢摩他、毘鉢舍那平等運道說名瑜伽」〔T30 0884a24〕。 古德於本葉「略」之處據實標:九住各名義(遁倫唯揀等住·遍住·澄淨·最寂淨釋·餘準論文)·慈愍觀(遁倫「如文可知」·窺基卷30 無·無逐句)·窺基緣起/界/阿那波那(卷30 無·其釋在卷27–28 安立段·別卷互見)。
一、科判定位
| 科判系統 | 此段之位 |
|---|---|
| 玄奘 T1579 本地分十七地 | 第十三聲聞地·第三瑜伽處·科6「一境性」(安立五處之三)〔T30 0450b27–0455b15〕 |
| 論文自身 | 心一境性(數數隨念·同分所緣·流注·無罪適悅)→通止觀二品→奢摩他品(九種心住·六種力·四種作意)→毘鉢舍那品(四種毘鉢舍那·三門·六事差別所緣〔義事相品時理〕+三覺)→六事所緣遍五淨行(不淨·慈愍·緣起·界差別·阿那波那念)→止觀雙運結 |
| 遁倫《論記》 | 「境性及與淨障,於中有三:初、解心一境性;次、解淨障;後、以頌總收」;心一境性中「先總、次別、後結」,又「明心一境性通於止觀」(開二門:奢摩他品九種心住·毘鉢舍那品四種慧行)〔T42 0462c28〕 |
| 窺基《略纂》 | 安立五門「護養·遠離·境性·障淨·修作意」之第三「境性」;釋九住「未必是定中心,但以住一緣即是」(通定散)〔T43 0118c11〕 |
二、異譯·經內平行對勘
- 異譯:真諦《十七地論》卷30 相當·漢無傳本(佚)·從闕。
- 經內平行(攝決擇)·僅部分相應:攝決擇分聲聞地〔T30 0669b08 起〕不以「九種心住·六事差別·四種毘鉢舍那」之名重決擇(此三類之名於攝決擇分聲聞地不復現)。唯〔T30 0686b01 起〕「有四種法,於所得定為增上緣」(科目 17 項·審諦聽聞·得正教授·宿世串習·具足多聞,各「由此因此緣得心一境性」)與本段六種力(聽聞·思惟·憶念·正知·精進·串習)為交疊而開合不同之列(攝決擇四·本地分六),餘〔0686b27 起〕涉奢摩他道·毘鉢舍那道(§19 正觀念住)。唯錄交疊,不判合一。
校勘(大正原書校記全枚舉)
本段(0450b27–0455b15)大正原書藏本異讀校記共 30 條+卷末大正編者原註 1 條(<app> 逐條校勘元素雖 0,原書校記以註記形式收錄——「校勘元素零」不等於「無校記」)。底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印);本段無一條升定本案,異讀並錄備考:
| 註號 | 錨 | 底本【大】 | 異讀(校本) | 語境 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0450005 | 0450c02 | 注 | 住【宋】【元】 | 心一境性·流注(注/住) |
| 0450006 | 0450c09 | 間 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】 | 無罪適悅段 |
| 0451001 | 0451a17 | 任 | 住【元】 | 奢摩他品(任/住) |
| 0451002 | 0451b06 | 有 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】 | 六種力段 |
| 0451003 | 0451b17 | 惑 | 戒【宋】【元】【明】 | 四作意段(惑/戒) |
| 0452001 | 0452a20 | 穢朽 | 朽穢【宋】【元】【明】【聖】 | 不淨觀·變壞相 |
| 0452002 | 0452a24 | 污 | 汗【宋】【元】【聖】 | 不淨相 |
| 0452003 | 0452b04 | 二 | 一【元】 | 不淨觀段 |
| 0452004 | 0452b14 | 髖 | 𬧅【宋】,腨【元】【明】,髆【聖】 | 骨鎖相·身分名(四傳異) |
| 0452005 | 0452b19 | 勝 | 解【宋】【元】【明】【聖】 | 不淨觀段(勝/解) |
| 0452006 | 0452b21 | 鑊 | 銷【宋】【元】【明】 | 骨相段 |
| 0452007 | 0452b22 | 膞 | 髆【宋】【元】【明】【聖】 | 身分名 |
| 0452008 | 0452c13 | 黑 | 異【宋】【元】 | 不淨相(黑/異) |
| 0452009 | 0452c14 | 災 | 害【宋】【元】【明】 | 不淨觀段 |
| 0453001 | 0453a19 | 令 | 今【元】【明】 | 慈愍觀段(令/今) |
| 0453002 | 0453c02 | 性 | 性是【聖】 | 緣起觀段 |
| 0453003 | 0453c19 | 過 | 道【元】 | 緣起觀段(過/道) |
| 0454002 | 0454a20 | 化 | 死【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 界差別段(化/死) |
| 0454003 | 0454a25 | 前 | 別【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | 界差別段 |
| 0454004 | 0454b12 | 相 | 想【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | 阿那波那念(相/想) |
| 0454005 | 0454b13 | 姓* | 性【宋】【元】【明】【宮】* | 種性(姓/性) |
| 0454006 | 0454b16 | 種 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 阿那波那段 |
| 0454007 | 0454c17 | 諸 | 識【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 息念段(諸/識) |
| 0454008 | 0454c19 | 合相 | 念想【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 息念·相(合相/念想) |
| 0454009 | 0454c20 | 合 | 念【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 息念段(合/念) |
| 0455001 | 0455a03 | 比 | 此【元】 | 止觀雙運段(比/此) |
| 0455002 | 0455a04 | 如 | 以【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | 雙運段(如/以) |
| 0455003 | 0455a08 | 謂 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 雙運段 |
| 0455004 | 0455b14 | 惑 | 行【明】 | 結段(惑/行) |
| 0455005 | 0455b14 | 所緣 | 〔-〕【元】【明】 | 結段 |
| 0454001 | 卷末(0454) | 大正編者原註 | 此下聖本有光明皇后願文(卷30末側·不採) | 不採 |
全 30 條藏本異讀底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印),無升定本案。帶*者係大正原欄星標,照錄。0454001 係大正編者原註(聖本卷末願文),非藏本異讀,並錄註明。此外古德引本字異(窺基「惡嗅/生嗅」·遁倫「惡臭/生臭」)非藏本校記,唯錄。
三、聖教義之經據(眼·重——心一境性·四毘鉢舍那·盡如所有性·止觀雙運,皆通《解深密·分別瑜伽品》之唯識義)
本段為止觀自性所在,義眼重:其心一境性·四種毘鉢舍那·盡所有性/如所有性·止觀雙運,皆與《解深密經·分別瑜伽品》(慈氏問·世尊答·同一玄奘譯系)逐義相通。錄經據四:
(一) 四種毘鉢舍那·逐字同經〔解深密 T16 0698a11〕——經云:「即於如是三摩地影像所知義中,能正思擇、最極思擇、周遍尋思、周遍伺察……是名毘鉢舍那。」與本段四毘鉢舍那(0451 本論)四句逐字相同;經之「有分別影像/無分別影像/事邊際/所作成辦」四種所緣境事,即分配奢摩他(無分別影像)·毘鉢舍那(有分別影像)·俱(事邊際·所作成辦)〔0697c19〕。
(二) 心一境性=通達影像唯識(義眼·結穴)〔解深密 T16 0698b22〕——經云:「云何心一境性?謂通達三摩地所行影像,唯是其識;或通達此已,復思惟如性。」此正以「影像唯識(盡所有性層)→復思惟如性(如所有性層)」釋止觀所緣之心一境性;本段「能正思擇盡所有性·最極思擇如所有性」(0451 本論)即此二層。
(三) 影像唯識所現·鏡喻〔解深密 T16 0698b02·0698b06〕——經云:「我說識所緣,唯識所現故……如依善瑩清淨鏡面,以質為緣還見本質,而謂我今見於影像。」毘鉢舍那三摩地所行影像,與此心當言無異——「由彼影像唯是識故」;此為本段毘鉢舍那所緣之唯識義眼(聲聞止觀之所緣影像,經判為唯識所現)。
(四) 盡所有性/如所有性·止觀雙運〔解深密 T16 盡所有性 0699c15·如所有性 0699c18·止觀雙運 0699b25〕——經云盡所有性「謂諸雜染清淨法中,所有一切品別邊際」(蘊處等)、如所有性「謂即一切染淨法中,所有真如」(七真如);又明止道·觀道·雙運轉道。本段「依奢摩他令毘鉢舍那速得清淨·依毘鉢舍那令奢摩他增長廣大」(0455 本論)即雙運義。
〔按〕本段唯識義眼悉據《解深密·分別瑜伽品》經本(佛說·玄奘譯),非現代詮釋;聲聞地止觀之所緣影像,經自判為唯識所現——錄經據以顯義眼,不別承、不引現代學者(經與古德徵引之約)。
四、諸家異釋(古德·唯錄不判)
止觀體·心一境性科判(遁倫)
〔遁倫 T42 0462c28〕:
「境性及與淨障,於中有三:初、解心一境性;次、解淨障;後、以頌總收。前中有三:初、正解心一境性;二、明心一境性通於止觀;三、明九種加行。……第二明心一境性通於止觀中……於中有二:初、解四品九種心住;二、『云何四種毘鉢舍那』下,釋觀品四種慧行。前中有四:初、列;二、釋;三、明六種力成九住心;四、明九種住心有四作意通止觀品。」
九種心住·名義(遁倫唯揀數名·餘準論文)
〔遁倫 T42 0463a 內·泰/基〕:
〔泰〕「離於沈浮名為等住;審悉遍觀名為遍住;始終無間名為相續方便;離亂寂靜名澄淨;破惡尋思隨煩惱、失念欻起尋即除遣,名最寂淨。」 〔基〕「謂有種種欲恚害等諸惡尋思、貪欲蓋等諸隨煩惱令心擾動者,此乃舉過患方生厭故。」 〔按〕內住·近住·專注一趣·等持,遁倫·窺基俱無別名義釋(準論文自說);窺基唯補「九住未必定中心,但住一緣即是;最初歛心未必得定,故云奢摩他品類、非皆奢摩他」(通定散)〔T43 0118c11〕。
六種力配九住(遁倫·窺基並詳·三說料簡·近同)
〔遁倫 T42 0463b11;窺基 T43 0118c22〕:
遁倫:「其安住通三力:若觀未成即初二力收,若觀行成即憶念力收……故知初二力但成內住、等住,由憶念力成其安住、近住。」 窺基:「其安住通三力,若觀未成即初二力收,若觀行成即憶念力收。……又『等遍安住』之言,即但等住一種,非取安住。」 〔按〕二師於「安住屬何力」設三說(初二力/憶念力/通三力)而同歸:聽聞思惟二力成內住等住·憶念力成安住近住;正知力→調順寂靜·精進力→最極寂靜專注一趣·串習力→等持,準論文。遁倫此段引基師為本(窺基《略纂》原文),知二記同源。
四種作意配七作意(遁倫·備〔玄範〕)
〔遁倫 T42 0463b23〕:
「〔備云〕前二住心是七作意前方便故,名為力勵。次五住心是了相作意所攝,故名為有間〔缺〕。第八住心有五作意〔勝解~加行究竟〕。第九住心有〔加行究竟〕果作意。問:為有四觀與七作意相攝耶?備云:論既不說故互不攝。今解,此文既云『即由四作意修毘鉢舍那』故亦是毘鉢舍那品,故知隨應相攝。」
四毘鉢舍那·三門·三覺對應(三覺對應=本論自說·古德唯申釋事邊際/如實覺)
三覺→六事之對應為本論自立(原典 0452a:尋思義故起語義覺·尋思其事及自相故起事邊際覺·尋思共相品時理故起如實覺)。古德就此申釋者:
〔窺基 T43 0119a16〕:「論云『三門、六事攝慧四種毘鉢舍那』者,此慧一一皆通三門、六事。」 〔遁倫 T42 0463c15·基〕:「尋思第二事、第三相中,自相故起事邊際覺等……尋思第三相中共相、第四品、第五時、第六理,稱法而知故起如實覺。」 〔按〕三覺全對應為本論自立(原典 0452a 段);古德(基)唯就事邊際覺·如實覺申釋·不別釋語義覺(「語義覺」T42 無·非古德語)。
法爾道理·三法性(窺基)
〔窺基 T43 0119a19〕:
「如所作性故,還成立聲無常,此為成立法性。如業、藥草、呪術,是難思法性。謂法爾種子三乘差別性,名安住法性。」
不淨觀·惡臭生臭+立量(遁倫·窺基·泰·基)
〔遁倫 T42 0463c 內;窺基 T43 0119a24〕:
遁倫〔泰/基〕:「〔泰〕如食至熟名惡臭,未至熟位名生臭。〔基〕變壞故臭名惡臭,如糞穢等;纔生便臭名生臭,如薤蒜等。」 窺基:「變壞故嗅名為惡嗅,如糞穢等;纔生便嗅名為生嗅,如韮䔉〔缺字 CB01942/CB05005〕等。……謂立量云:緣不淨時必能治欲貪,以緣能治故,如緣無相時能遣有相。」
★ 慈愍觀·古德略(遁倫「如文可知」·窺基卷30 無)
〔遁倫 T42 0464b01〕:
「第二明修慈觀者,尋思六事差別所緣觀,如文可知。」 〔按〕慈愍觀之平等性心·相似性心·怨親無定等,遁倫唯標「如文可知」·無逐句;窺基卷30 亦無(其「心平等性」釋在卷29 八斷行·別段)。古德略,不補。
緣起觀·二因(遁倫·三藏〔玄奘〕料簡牽引/生起因之取)
〔遁倫 T42 0464b27〕:
「三藏云:牽引因正取善惡業體;今此文中,通取行因無明及行所引五支種子,並名牽引因。……三藏云:生起因正取愛取,文中約受辨所生愛名生起因。」
界差別·阿那波那(遁倫釋·窺基卷30 無)
〔遁倫 T42 0464c 內〕:界差別「六界為緣得入母胎」·法爾道理「堅濕煗動性自成立、有佛無佛地常堅」;阿那波那「入息出息各二(含中間息)·起續多時名長·中間暫起名短」。〔窺基本段之阿那波那音寫「阿那名持來=入息·波那名持去=出息」在卷27 安立段·別卷互見,非本葉。〕
止觀雙運結(遁倫)
〔遁倫 T42 0465a 內〕:
「『如是依止淨行所緣尋思六事差別觀已』,下結及指也:結前五停心觀名淨行所緣;『若依止善巧所緣及淨惑所緣,於其自處我後當說』者,下辨善巧所緣、淨惑所緣處,名為自處。」(五淨行=五停心觀;善巧/淨惑所緣指後當說處·待後說。)
〔按目:遁倫·窺基·神泰·玄範〔備〕·玄奘〔三藏〕皆古德。二師於本葉「略」處(九住數名·慈愍·窺基緣起界數息)據實標·不補。最勝子無逐句專釋(目首凡例)。〕
五、術語(漢/古德傳梵·發音輔助)
| 漢 | 傳梵(音寫·發音輔助) | 義 |
|---|---|---|
| 奢摩他 | śamatha | 止(心一境·寂止) |
| 毘鉢舍那 | vipaśyanā | 觀(簡擇·慧觀) |
| 三摩地 | samādhi | 等持·定 |
| 阿那波那(念) | ānāpāna〔窺基音釋「阿那名持來=入息·波那名持去=出息」·卷27 別卷〕 | 入出息念 |
| 嗢柁南 | uddāna(玄奘譯本用·古德於本葉無別釋音) | 攝頌 |
| 九種心住/六種力/四種作意/四種毘鉢舍那/盡所有性/如所有性/止觀雙運 | —(義譯·從闕) | 義譯名相·非古德音寫 |
梵僅古德音寫;義譯名相 IAST 從闕(依古德所傳梵之約)。奢摩他·毘鉢舍那·三摩地為玄奘譯本通用音寫;阿那波那音釋為窺基卷27 自出(別卷錄)。
六、譬喻·修辭
(一) 鏡喻·影像唯識(解深密·眼·重)〔解深密 T16 0698b06〕——「如依善瑩清淨鏡面,以質為緣還見本質,而謂我今見於影像」:以鏡面緣質還現本質為喻,顯毘鉢舍那所行影像唯是識所現、實無異質。此喻為本段止觀所緣之唯識義眼所繫(經喻·非論本自立)。 (二) 不淨九變壞相(論本自立·所緣相非譬喻)〔T30 0451c–0452a〕——青瘀·膿爛·爛壞胮脹·食噉·異赤·分散·骨·鎖·骨鎖九相,及三變壞(自然·他所·俱品),為不淨觀之所緣境相,論本自立、次第宛然;非取譬之喻,乃修觀之所緣,錄為修辭之相。 (三) 惡臭/生臭·糞穢薤蒜(古德釋·喻體)〔遁倫 T42 0463c·窺基 T43 0119a24〕——釋不淨「惡臭·生臭」二相,古德以「糞穢(變壞故臭)·薤蒜韮䔉(纔生便臭)」為喻體,分判二臭之別。
七、互讀(承衍)
- 承科5遠離·啟科6一境性:安立五處之三「心一境性」即本葉所開;窺基釋安立五門至「云何心一境性第三」徑入本段〔T43 0118c〕。前行(13-03-01)立竟·止觀正修於此始。
- 止觀雙運→善巧所緣·淨惑所緣(指後·於其自處後說):本段六事所緣唯施於淨行五停心(不淨·慈愍·緣起·界·數息);依善巧所緣(蘊界處緣起處非處)及淨惑所緣(世間/出世間道)尋思六事,論明「於其自處我後當說」〔T30 0455b〕——指後當說處(攝決擇/後分),本葉不涉。
- 九種心住→後出慈氏無著諸論(承衍·穩定徵引):本段九種心住(內住~等持)為後出慈氏無著系論所承用之「九種心住」綱(如《大乘莊嚴經論》T31n1604·《攝大乘論》系),此據藏經號穩定徵引,不別判。
- 心一境性·四毘鉢舍那·盡如所有性·止觀雙運→《解深密·分別瑜伽品》(唯識義眼·經據互讀):見目三。聲聞地止觀之所緣影像,經(解深密)判為唯識所現·影像唯是識;此為本聲聞止觀通於唯識義之經內樞紐。
八、校本定位
- 底本:CBETA T30n1579 卷30–31·第三瑜伽處·科6 一境性(心一境性~止觀雙運結)0450b27–0455b15。
- 古德頁錨(皆就藏經原文逐字複驗):遁倫《論記》卷七之下 T42 0462c28 起(科判 0462c28·六力安住通三力 0463b11·四作意配七作意 0463b23·慈愍如文可知 0464b01·緣起三藏牽引因 0464b27·不淨惡臭生臭 0463c·界母胎/阿那波那 0464c·止觀雙運結 0465a)。最勝子 T30 0884a24(序釋一語「奢摩他、毘鉢舍那平等運道說名瑜伽」)·無逐句專釋。
- 義理錨經(皆就藏經原文複驗):解深密經分別瑜伽品 T16n0676——四毘鉢舍那 四句式 0698a11·唯識所現 0698b02·鏡喻 0698b06·心一境性通達影像 0698b22·盡所有性 0699c15·如所有性 0699c18。
- 經內平行:攝決擇分聲聞地 T30 0686b01「有四種法,於所得定為增上緣」(科目 17 項 0686a29)部分相應六力·不重決擇九住六事四毘鉢舍那(藏本逐字驗)。
- 校勘:本段大正原書藏本異讀校記 30 條全枚舉+卷末大正編者原註 1 條(目二·正文錨全定位·底本從 CBETA 承字讀·無升定本案);「校勘元素零」不等於「無校記」(原書校記以註記形式收錄);古德引本字異(惡臭/惡嗅·生臭/生嗅)非藏本校記唯錄;真諦卷30 相當佚·從闕。缺字:窺基不淨段「韮䔉」CB01942/CB05005(屬窺基淨障段·本葉引文邊際·已標)。
The eight headings, with the canonical text as the ground; the grounds cited = scripture and the ancients (T1828 Dunlun's Notes / T1829 Kuiji's Concise Compendium / T1580 Jinaputra's Commentary), the doctrinal anchor in scripture = the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis (T16n0676). Cited Chinese passages are retained in Chinese. A single-source Western Sanskrit manuscript + Tibetan translation = not a ground; Sanskrit only where the ancients transliterated, otherwise left blank. Divergent readings among the ancients are recorded only, not adjudicated. This stage has no "East-West comparison" heading. Two states of the ancients on this leaf: Dunlun's Notes fascicle 7, latter part 〔T42 0462c28–0465a13〕 glossing in sequence heading by heading (the outline-placement of one-pointedness of mind · the six forces matched to the nine abidings 〔three accounts weighed〕 · the four attentions matched to the seven attentions · the four insights, three gateways, six matters · the correspondence of the three cognitions · the contemplations of the impure / dependent origination / elements / mindfulness of breathing · the closing knot of the joined operation of tranquillity and insight · citing Tai 〔Shentai〕 · Bei 〔Xuanfan〕 · the Tripiṭaka-master 〔Xuanzang〕); Kuiji's Concise Compendium fascicle 8 (treatise fascicle 30) 〔T43 0118b04–0119b18〕 glossing one-pointedness of mind · the nine abidings as pertaining to both equipoise and the diffuse · the six forces matched to the nine abidings · the three natures of the nature-of-things · the contemplation of the impure (dependent origination / elements / breathing are not re-glossed in fascicle 30). Jinaputra's Commentary T1580 has no line-by-line dedicated gloss, only one line in its prefatory gloss making plain that 「奢摩他、毘鉢舍那平等運道說名瑜伽」 tr. "śamatha and vipaśyanā, the path of even operation, are called yoga" 〔T30 0884a24〕. Where the ancients are "brief" on this leaf, it is marked as it stands: the naming of each of the nine abidings (Dunlun glosses only even abiding · all-round abiding · clarifying · utterly stilled, the rest following the treatise's own statement) · the contemplation of loving-kindness (Dunlun: "clear from the text" · Kuiji fascicle 30: absent · no line-by-line gloss) · Kuiji on dependent origination / elements / mindfulness of breathing (absent in fascicle 30 · his gloss is in the establishing passage of fascicles 27–28 · to be found across separate fascicles).
I. Doctrinal-Outline Placement
| Outline system | Placement of this passage |
|---|---|
| Xuanzang T1579, the seventeen stages of the Basic Section | The thirteenth, the Śrāvaka Stage · the third yoga-station · rubric 6, "one-pointedness of mind" (the third of the five things established) 〔T30 0450b27–0455b15〕 |
| The treatise itself | One-pointedness of mind (recollecting again and again · the object of the same class · flowing on · blameless ease) → running through both the tranquillity and insight divisions → the tranquillity division (the nine mental abidings · the six forces · the four attentions) → the insight division (the four insights · the three gateways · the object-differentiated-by-six-matters 〔meaning · thing · mark · class · time · principle〕 + the three cognitions) → the object-of-six-matters run through the five purifying practices (the impure · loving-kindness · dependent origination · the differentiation of elements · mindfulness of in-and-out breathing) → the closing knot of the joined operation of tranquillity and insight |
| Dunlun's Notes | 「境性及與淨障,於中有三:初、解心一境性;次、解淨障;後、以頌總收」 tr. "one-pointedness and the purifying of obstacles — herein there are three: first, glossing one-pointedness of mind; next, glossing the purifying of obstacles; last, gathering all up in a verse"; within one-pointedness of mind, "first the general, next the particular, last the conclusion," and again "showing that one-pointedness of mind runs through both tranquillity and insight" (opening two gateways: the nine mental abidings of the tranquillity division · the four wisdom-practices of the insight division) 〔T42 0462c28〕 |
| Kuiji's Concise Compendium | The third, "one-pointedness," of the five gateways established, "protective nurture · seclusion · one-pointedness · the purifying of obstacles · the making of attention"; glossing the nine abidings as 「未必是定中心,但以住一緣即是」 tr. "not necessarily the mind within meditative equipoise, but abiding upon a single object is just this" (pertaining to both equipoise and the diffuse) 〔T43 0118c11〕 |
II. Alternate Translations · Collation of In-Scripture Parallels
- Alternate translation: Paramārtha's Treatise on the Seventeen Stages (十七地論), corresponding to fascicle 30, is not transmitted in Chinese (lost) · omitted here.
- In-scripture parallel (the Section on Ascertainment) · corresponding only in part: the Śrāvaka portion of the Section on Ascertainment 〔from T30 0669b08〕 does not re-ascertain under the names "the nine mental abidings · the object-differentiated-by-six-matters · the four insights" (these three sets of names do not reappear in the Śrāvaka portion of the Section on Ascertainment). Only 〔from T30 0686b01〕 「有四種法,於所得定為增上緣」 tr. "there are four dharmas that serve as the dominant condition for the meditation gained" (a rubric of 17 items · careful listening · gaining right teaching · repeated practice in former lives · being possessed of much learning, each "by this cause, by this condition, gaining one-pointedness of mind") overlaps with this passage's six forces (hearing · reflection · recollection · full awareness · vigor · repeated practice), as a list overlapping but opened-and-gathered differently (four in the Ascertainment · six in the Basic Section); the remainder 〔from 0686b27〕 touches on the path of tranquillity and the path of insight (§19, the right contemplation of the foundations of mindfulness). Only the overlap is recorded; they are not judged to be one.
Collation (full enumeration of the Taishō base text's collation notes)
For this passage (0450b27–0455b15), the Taishō base text's collation notes on canonical-edition variant readings total 30 notes + 1 original editorial note of the Taishō editors at the fascicle's end (although the <app> note-by-note collation elements number 0, the base text's collation notes are recorded in annotation form — "zero collation elements" does not equal "no collation notes"). The base follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); not a single note in this passage rises to a critical-edition emendation; variants are recorded alongside for the record:
| Note # | Anchor | Base 【大 Taishō】 | Variant (canonical edition) | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0450005 | 0450c02 | 注 | 住【宋】【元】 | One-pointedness of mind · flowing on (注 / 住) |
| 0450006 | 0450c09 | 間 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】 | The blameless-ease passage |
| 0451001 | 0451a17 | 任 | 住【元】 | The tranquillity division (任 / 住) |
| 0451002 | 0451b06 | 有 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】 | The six-forces passage |
| 0451003 | 0451b17 | 惑 | 戒【宋】【元】【明】 | The four-attentions passage (惑 / 戒) |
| 0452001 | 0452a20 | 穢朽 | 朽穢【宋】【元】【明】【聖】 | The contemplation of the impure · marks of decay |
| 0452002 | 0452a24 | 污 | 汗【宋】【元】【聖】 | Impure mark |
| 0452003 | 0452b04 | 二 | 一【元】 | The contemplation-of-the-impure passage |
| 0452004 | 0452b14 | 髖 | 𬧅【宋】,腨【元】【明】,髆【聖】 | The bone-chain mark · a body-part name (four transmissions differ) |
| 0452005 | 0452b19 | 勝 | 解【宋】【元】【明】【聖】 | The contemplation-of-the-impure passage (勝 / 解) |
| 0452006 | 0452b21 | 鑊 | 銷【宋】【元】【明】 | The bone-mark passage |
| 0452007 | 0452b22 | 膞 | 髆【宋】【元】【明】【聖】 | A body-part name |
| 0452008 | 0452c13 | 黑 | 異【宋】【元】 | Impure mark (黑 / 異) |
| 0452009 | 0452c14 | 災 | 害【宋】【元】【明】 | The contemplation-of-the-impure passage |
| 0453001 | 0453a19 | 令 | 今【元】【明】 | The contemplation-of-loving-kindness passage (令 / 今) |
| 0453002 | 0453c02 | 性 | 性是【聖】 | The contemplation-of-dependent-origination passage |
| 0453003 | 0453c19 | 過 | 道【元】 | The contemplation-of-dependent-origination passage (過 / 道) |
| 0454002 | 0454a20 | 化 | 死【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The differentiation-of-elements passage (化 / 死) |
| 0454003 | 0454a25 | 前 | 別【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | The differentiation-of-elements passage |
| 0454004 | 0454b12 | 相 | 想【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | Mindfulness of in-and-out breathing (相 / 想) |
| 0454005 | 0454b13 | 姓* | 性【宋】【元】【明】【宮】* | Lineage (姓 / 性) |
| 0454006 | 0454b16 | 種 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The mindfulness-of-breathing passage |
| 0454007 | 0454c17 | 諸 | 識【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The breath-mindfulness passage (諸 / 識) |
| 0454008 | 0454c19 | 合相 | 念想【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | Breath-mindfulness · mark (合相 / 念想) |
| 0454009 | 0454c20 | 合 | 念【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The breath-mindfulness passage (合 / 念) |
| 0455001 | 0455a03 | 比 | 此【元】 | The joined-operation passage (比 / 此) |
| 0455002 | 0455a04 | 如 | 以【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | The joined-operation passage (如 / 以) |
| 0455003 | 0455a08 | 謂 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The joined-operation passage |
| 0455004 | 0455b14 | 惑 | 行【明】 | The closing passage (惑 / 行) |
| 0455005 | 0455b14 | 所緣 | 〔-〕【元】【明】 | The closing passage |
| 0454001 | Fascicle end (0454) | Original editorial note of the Taishō editors | 此下聖本有光明皇后願文(卷30末側·不採) tr. below this, the Sheng edition has the votive text of Empress Kōmyō (at the side of the end of fascicle 30 · not adopted) | Not adopted |
All 30 canonical-edition variant readings follow the CBETA character-readings in the base (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); none rises to a critical-edition emendation. Those marked * carry the Taishō's original column asterisk, transcribed as is. 0454001 is an original editorial note of the Taishō editors (the votive text at the fascicle's end in the Sheng edition), not a canonical-edition variant, recorded alongside with a note. Besides these, the ancients' cited-text variants (Kuiji 「惡嗅/生嗅」 · Dunlun 「惡臭/生臭」) are not canonical-edition collation notes; recorded only.
III. Scriptural Grounds for the Sagely Teaching's Meaning (the Eye · Heavy — one-pointedness of mind · the four insights · the extent- and way-of-being · the joined operation of tranquillity and insight, all communicate with the Consciousness-Only meaning of the Saṃdhinirmocana, Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis)
This passage is the site of the essential nature of tranquillity-and-insight, and the doctrinal eye is heavy: its one-pointedness of mind · four insights · extent-of-being / way-of-being · joined operation of tranquillity and insight all communicate meaning by meaning with the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis (Maitreya asks · the World-Honored One answers · the same Xuanzang translation lineage). Four scriptural grounds are recorded:
(1) The four insights · word-for-word the same as the scripture 〔Saṃdhinirmocana T16 0698a11〕 — the scripture says: 「即於如是三摩地影像所知義中,能正思擇、最極思擇、周遍尋思、周遍伺察……是名毘鉢舍那。」 tr. "right within the object-meaning to be known, the image in such meditative equipoise, one is able correctly to discern, utterly to discern, thoroughly to investigate, and thoroughly to examine … this is named insight." Its four phrases are word-for-word the same as this passage's four insights (the treatise itself, at 0451); the scripture's four kinds of object-field — the image with discrimination / the image without discrimination / the bounds of the thing / the accomplishment of the task — are then apportioned to tranquillity (the image without discrimination) · insight (the image with discrimination) · both (the bounds of the thing · the accomplishment of the task) 〔0697c19〕.
(2) One-pointedness of mind = penetrating that the image is nothing but consciousness (the doctrinal eye · the knot) 〔Saṃdhinirmocana T16 0698b22〕 — the scripture says: 「云何心一境性?謂通達三摩地所行影像,唯是其識;或通達此已,復思惟如性。」 tr. "What is one-pointedness of mind? It is penetrating that the image ranged over in meditative equipoise is nothing but consciousness; or, having penetrated this, further reflecting on the way-of-being." This glosses the one-pointedness of mind that tranquillity-and-insight rests upon precisely as "the image is nothing but consciousness (the extent-of-being layer) → further reflecting on the way-of-being (the way-of-being layer)"; this passage's "correctly discerning the extent-of-being · utterly discerning the way-of-being" (the treatise itself, at 0451) is just these two layers.
(3) The image is the appearance of consciousness · the mirror simile 〔Saṃdhinirmocana T16 0698b02 · 0698b06〕 — the scripture says: 「我說識所緣,唯識所現故……如依善瑩清淨鏡面,以質為緣還見本質,而謂我今見於影像。」 tr. "I say that the object of consciousness is nothing but the appearance of consciousness … as, in dependence on a well-burnished, clean mirror-face, with the substance as condition one sees again that very substance, and yet says, 'I now see an image.'" The image ranged over in insight's meditative equipoise is to be said to be no different from this mind — "because that image is nothing but consciousness"; this is the Consciousness-Only doctrinal eye of what this passage's insight rests upon (the object-image that śrāvaka tranquillity-and-insight rests upon is judged by the scripture to be the appearance of consciousness).
(4) The extent-of-being / the way-of-being · the joined operation of tranquillity and insight 〔Saṃdhinirmocana T16 the extent-of-being 0699c15 · the way-of-being 0699c18 · the joined operation of tranquillity and insight 0699b25〕 — the scripture says the extent-of-being is 「謂諸雜染清淨法中,所有一切品別邊際」 tr. "all the class-distinctions and bounds within the several defiled and pure dharmas" (the aggregates, bases, and the rest), and the way-of-being is 「謂即一切染淨法中,所有真如」 tr. "the suchness within all defiled and pure dharmas" (the seven suchnesses); it also makes plain the path of tranquillity · the path of insight · the path of joined operation. This passage's "in dependence on tranquillity, insight swiftly gains purity · in dependence on insight, tranquillity grows and becomes vast and great" (the treatise itself, at 0455) is just the meaning of the joined operation.
〔Note〕 The Consciousness-Only doctrinal eye of this passage rests entirely on the Saṃdhinirmocana, Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis, scriptural text (spoken by the Buddha · Xuanzang's translation), not on a modern reading; the object-image that Śrāvaka-Stage tranquillity-and-insight rests upon is judged by the scripture itself to be the appearance of consciousness — the scriptural grounds are recorded to show the doctrinal eye, without separately inheriting from, or citing, modern scholars (the convention of citing scripture and the ancients).
IV. The Explanations of the Various Masters (the Ancients · Recorded Only, Not Adjudicated)
The essential nature of tranquillity-and-insight · the outline-placement of one-pointedness of mind (Dunlun)
〔Dunlun T42 0462c28〕:
「境性及與淨障,於中有三:初、解心一境性;次、解淨障;後、以頌總收。前中有三:初、正解心一境性;二、明心一境性通於止觀;三、明九種加行。……第二明心一境性通於止觀中……於中有二:初、解四品九種心住;二、『云何四種毘鉢舍那』下,釋觀品四種慧行。前中有四:初、列;二、釋;三、明六種力成九住心;四、明九種住心有四作意通止觀品。」
tr. "One-pointedness and the purifying of obstacles — herein there are three: first, glossing one-pointedness of mind; next, glossing the purifying of obstacles; last, gathering all up in a verse. Within the first there are three: first, correctly glossing one-pointedness of mind; second, showing that one-pointedness of mind runs through both tranquillity and insight; third, showing the nine kinds of intensified practice. … Within the second, showing that one-pointedness of mind runs through both tranquillity and insight … herein there are two: first, glossing the four-division nine mental abidings; second, from 'what are the four insights' onward, glossing the four wisdom-practices of the insight division. Within the first there are four: first, the listing; second, the glossing; third, showing the six forces that accomplish the nine mental abidings; fourth, showing that the nine abiding-minds have four attentions running through both the tranquillity and insight divisions."
The nine mental abidings · naming (Dunlun glosses only a few names · the rest following the treatise's own statement)
〔Dunlun T42 0463a, within · Tai / Ji〕:
〔泰〕「離於沈浮名為等住;審悉遍觀名為遍住;始終無間名為相續方便;離亂寂靜名澄淨;破惡尋思隨煩惱、失念欻起尋即除遣,名最寂淨。」 tr. 〔Tai〕 "apart from sinking and floating is named even abiding; examining and contemplating all round in detail is named all-round abiding; unbroken from beginning to end is named the expedient of continuity; apart from disorder, stilled, is named clarifying; breaking evil thoughts and secondary afflictions, and, when mindfulness is lost and something suddenly rises, at once expelling it, is named utterly stilled." 〔基〕「謂有種種欲恚害等諸惡尋思、貪欲蓋等諸隨煩惱令心擾動者,此乃舉過患方生厭故。」 tr. 〔Ji, i.e. Kuiji〕 "as for the various evil thoughts of desire, ill-will, harm, and the rest, and the several secondary afflictions such as the hindrance of covetousness, that come to disturb the mind — this raises the fault-and-disaster, and only then does aversion arise." 〔Note〕 Inner abiding · close abiding · single-pointed absorption · holding-in-equipoise — Dunlun and Kuiji both have no separate gloss of their naming (following the treatise's own statement); Kuiji only supplies "the nine abidings are not necessarily the mind within meditative equipoise, but abiding upon a single object is just this; at the first, gathering the mind is not necessarily attaining equipoise, and so it is said to be 'of the tranquillity kind,' not that every one is already tranquillity" (pertaining to both equipoise and the diffuse) 〔T43 0118c11〕.
The six forces matched to the nine abidings (Dunlun and Kuiji both in detail · three accounts weighed · nearly the same)
〔Dunlun T42 0463b11; Kuiji T43 0118c22〕:
Dunlun: 「其安住通三力:若觀未成即初二力收,若觀行成即憶念力收……故知初二力但成內住、等住,由憶念力成其安住、近住。」 tr. "settled abiding runs through three forces: if contemplation is not yet accomplished it is gathered by the first two forces, and if the contemplative practice is accomplished it is gathered by the force of recollection … so one knows that the first two forces only accomplish inner abiding and even abiding, and by the force of recollection settled abiding and close abiding are accomplished." Kuiji: 「其安住通三力,若觀未成即初二力收,若觀行成即憶念力收。……又『等遍安住』之言,即但等住一種,非取安住。」 tr. "settled abiding runs through three forces: if contemplation is not yet accomplished it is gathered by the first two forces, and if the contemplative practice is accomplished it is gathered by the force of recollection. … Again, the phrase 'abiding evenly and all round' means only the single kind, even abiding, and does not take settled abiding." 〔Note〕 The two masters set out three accounts on "to which force settled abiding belongs" (the first two forces / the force of recollection / running through three forces), yet come to the same conclusion: the two forces of hearing and reflection accomplish inner abiding and even abiding · the force of recollection accomplishes settled abiding and close abiding; the force of full awareness → tamed and stilled · the force of vigor → utterly stilled and single-pointed absorption · the force of repeated practice → holding-in-equipoise, following the treatise's own statement. Dunlun here takes Ji's account (the original text of Kuiji's Concise Compendium) as his base — so one knows the two sets of notes are of one source.
The four attentions matched to the seven attentions (Dunlun · Bei 〔Xuanfan〕)
〔Dunlun T42 0463b23〕:
「〔備云〕前二住心是七作意前方便故,名為力勵。次五住心是了相作意所攝,故名為有間〔缺〕。第八住心有五作意〔勝解~加行究竟〕。第九住心有〔加行究竟〕果作意。問:為有四觀與七作意相攝耶?備云:論既不說故互不攝。今解,此文既云『即由四作意修毘鉢舍那』故亦是毘鉢舍那品,故知隨應相攝。」 tr. "〔Bei says〕 the first two abiding-minds are the preliminary expedient of the seven attentions, and so are named striving. The next five abiding-minds are subsumed under the attention of apprehending-the-aspect, and so are named interrupted 〔with break〕. The eighth abiding-mind has five attentions 〔from resolute conviction to the culmination of effort〕. The ninth abiding-mind has the fruit-attention 〔the fruit of the culmination of effort〕. Question: do the four contemplations mutually subsume the seven attentions? Bei says: since the treatise does not say so, they do not mutually subsume. Now I gloss: since this text says 'it is by the four attentions that one cultivates insight,' therefore it is also the insight division, and so one knows they mutually subsume according to what is fitting."
The four insights · three gateways · the correspondence of the three cognitions (the correspondence of the three cognitions = the treatise's own statement · the ancients gloss only the cognition-of-the-bounds-of-the-thing / cognition-of-things-as-they-are)
The correspondence of the three cognitions to the six matters is set up by the treatise itself (the canonical text at 0452a: because one investigates meaning the cognition of word-meaning arises · because one investigates the thing and the particular-mark the cognition of the bounds of the thing arises · because one investigates the common-mark, class, time, and principle the cognition of things-as-they-are arises). Those among the ancients who gloss upon this:
〔Kuiji T43 0119a16〕: 「論云『三門、六事攝慧四種毘鉢舍那』者,此慧一一皆通三門、六事。」 tr. "as for the treatise's saying 'the three gateways and the six matters subsume the wisdom of the four insights,' each single one of this wisdom runs through the three gateways and the six matters." 〔Dunlun T42 0463c15 · Ji〕: 「尋思第二事、第三相中,自相故起事邊際覺等……尋思第三相中共相、第四品、第五時、第六理,稱法而知故起如實覺。」 tr. "in investigating the second, thing, and within the third, mark, because of the particular-mark the cognition of the bounds of the thing arises, and the rest … in investigating within the third, mark, the common-mark, and the fourth, class, the fifth, time, and the sixth, principle, because one knows in accord with the dharma, the cognition of things-as-they-are arises." 〔Note〕 The full correspondence of the three cognitions is set up by the treatise itself (the canonical-text passage at 0452a); the ancients (Ji) gloss only upon the cognition of the bounds of the thing · the cognition of things-as-they-are · and do not separately gloss the cognition of word-meaning ("the cognition of word-meaning" is absent in T42 · not a phrase of the ancients).
The principle of the nature of things · the three natures of the nature-of-things (Kuiji)
〔Kuiji T43 0119a19〕:
「如所作性故,還成立聲無常,此為成立法性。如業、藥草、呪術,是難思法性。謂法爾種子三乘差別性,名安住法性。」 tr. "because of the produced-nature, one establishes back that sound is impermanent — this is the established nature of things. As with karma, medicinal herbs, and spells, this is the nature of things hard to conceive. The differentiated nature of the three vehicles that is the seed of the nature-of-things is named the nature of things that abides."
The contemplation of the impure · malodor and raw stink + the setting-up of a proof (Dunlun · Kuiji · Tai · Ji)
〔Dunlun T42 0463c, within; Kuiji T43 0119a24〕:
Dunlun 〔Tai / Ji〕: 「〔泰〕如食至熟名惡臭,未至熟位名生臭。〔基〕變壞故臭名惡臭,如糞穢等;纔生便臭名生臭,如薤蒜等。」 tr. 〔Tai〕 "as when food comes to ripeness it is named malodor, and when it has not yet come to the ripe phase it is named raw stink. 〔Ji〕 because it stinks by having decayed it is named malodor, as with dung, filth, and the like; because it stinks the moment it is born it is named raw stink, as with scallion, garlic, and the like." Kuiji: 「變壞故嗅名為惡嗅,如糞穢等;纔生便嗅名為生嗅,如韮䔉〔缺字 CB01942/CB05005〕等。……謂立量云:緣不淨時必能治欲貪,以緣能治故,如緣無相時能遣有相。」 tr. "because it stinks by having decayed it is named malodor, as with dung, filth, and the like; because it stinks the moment it is born it is named raw stink, as with leek and shallot 〔missing character CB01942/CB05005〕 and the like. … That is, setting up a proof, one says: when one takes the impure as object, one is certainly able to counter desire-and-greed, because one takes the counteragent as object — as, when one takes the markless as object, one is able to expel the marked."
★ The contemplation of loving-kindness · the ancients are brief (Dunlun: "clear from the text" · Kuiji fascicle 30: absent)
〔Dunlun T42 0464b01〕:
「第二明修慈觀者,尋思六事差別所緣觀,如文可知。」 tr. "second, showing the one who cultivates the contemplation of loving-kindness, investigating the differentiated-object contemplation of the six matters, is clear from the text." 〔Note〕 The mind of evenness · the mind of resemblance · foe and friend not fixed, and the rest, of the contemplation of loving-kindness, Dunlun only marks with 'clear from the text' · with no line-by-line gloss; Kuiji fascicle 30 likewise has none (his gloss on "the evenness of mind" is in fascicle 29, the eight practices that sever, a separate passage). The ancients are brief; not supplemented.
The contemplation of dependent origination · the two causes (Dunlun · the Tripiṭaka-master 〔Xuanzang〕 weighs the grasping of the drawing-in / giving-rise causes)
〔Dunlun T42 0464b27〕:
「三藏云:牽引因正取善惡業體;今此文中,通取行因無明及行所引五支種子,並名牽引因。……三藏云:生起因正取愛取,文中約受辨所生愛名生起因。」 tr. "the Tripiṭaka-master says: the drawing-in cause properly takes the substance of wholesome and unwholesome karma; in this present text, it takes together the ignorance (avidyā) that is the cause of the formations and the seeds of the five members drawn forth by the formations, and all are named the drawing-in cause. … The Tripiṭaka-master says: the giving-rise cause properly takes craving and grasping, and the text, with reference to feeling, distinguishes the craving that is given rise to as the giving-rise cause."
The differentiation of elements · mindfulness of in-and-out breathing (Dunlun glosses · Kuiji fascicle 30: absent)
〔Dunlun T42 0464c, within〕: for the differentiation of elements, 「六界為緣得入母胎」 tr. "with the six elements as condition, one gains entry into the mother's womb" · for the principle of the nature of things, 「堅濕煗動性自成立、有佛無佛地常堅」 tr. "the natures of hardness, moisture, warmth, and motion establish themselves, and whether a buddha exists or not, the earth is ever hard"; for mindfulness of in-and-out breathing, "the in-breath and out-breath are each twofold (including the intermediate breath) · when it rises and continues a long while it is named long · when it briefly rises in between it is named short." 〔Kuiji's transliteration of ānāpāna for this passage, 「阿那名持來=入息·波那名持去=出息」 tr. "ana means 'bringing in' = the in-breath · pāna means 'carrying away' = the out-breath," is in fascicle 27, the establishing passage · to be found across separate fascicles, not on this leaf.〕
The closing knot of the joined operation of tranquillity and insight (Dunlun)
〔Dunlun T42 0465a, within〕:
「『如是依止淨行所緣尋思六事差別觀已』,下結及指也:結前五停心觀名淨行所緣;『若依止善巧所緣及淨惑所緣,於其自處我後當說』者,下辨善巧所緣、淨惑所緣處,名為自處。」 tr. "'thus, in dependence on the object of the purifying practices, having investigated the differentiated contemplation of the six matters' — below is the conclusion and the pointing-forward: it concludes the foregoing five stilling contemplations, named the object of the purifying practices; 'as for investigating in dependence on the object of skill and the object that purifies the afflictions, I shall speak of it in its own place' — below it discusses the site of the object of skill and the object that purifies the afflictions, named 'its own place.'" (The five purifying practices = the five stilling contemplations; the objects of skill / that purify the afflictions point to the site to be spoken of later · awaiting the later telling.)
〔Note on the heading: Dunlun · Kuiji · Shentai · Xuanfan 〔Bei〕 · Xuanzang 〔the Tripiṭaka-master〕 are all ancients. The two masters, where they are "brief" on this leaf (the naming of the nine abidings · loving-kindness · Kuiji on dependent origination, elements, and breathing), mark it as it stands · not supplemented. Jinaputra has no line-by-line dedicated gloss (as in the heading's prefatory convention).〕
V. Terminology (漢 / the ancients' transmitted Sanskrit · pronunciation aid)
| 漢 | Transmitted Sanskrit (transliteration · pronunciation aid) | Sense |
|---|---|---|
| 奢摩他 | śamatha | tranquillity (one-pointedness of mind · stilling) |
| 毘鉢舍那 | vipaśyanā | insight (discernment · the contemplation of wisdom) |
| 三摩地 | samādhi | concentration · meditation |
| 阿那波那(念) | ānāpāna 〔Kuiji's phonetic gloss "阿那名持來=入息·波那名持去=出息" · fascicle 27, a separate fascicle〕 | mindfulness of in-and-out breathing |
| 嗢柁南 | uddāna (used in Xuanzang's translation · the ancients give no separate phonetic gloss on this leaf) | summary verse |
| 九種心住/六種力/四種作意/四種毘鉢舍那/盡所有性/如所有性/止觀雙運 | — (rendered by meaning · left blank) | terms rendered by meaning · not transliterated by the ancients |
Sanskrit only where the ancients transliterated; the IAST of meaning-rendered terms is left blank (by the convention of the ancients' transmitted Sanskrit). 奢摩他 · 毘鉢舍那 · 三摩地 are the transliterations in common use in Xuanzang's translation; the phonetic gloss of 阿那波那 is Kuiji's own, from fascicle 27 (recorded from a separate fascicle).
VI. Similes · Rhetoric
(1) The mirror simile · the image is nothing but consciousness (the Saṃdhinirmocana · the eye · heavy) 〔Saṃdhinirmocana T16 0698b06〕 — 「如依善瑩清淨鏡面,以質為緣還見本質,而謂我今見於影像」 tr. "as, in dependence on a well-burnished, clean mirror-face, with the substance as condition one sees again that very substance, and yet says, 'I now see an image'": taking the mirror-face's seeing-again of the substance, with the substance as condition, as the simile, it shows that the image ranged over in insight is nothing but the appearance of consciousness, and truly is no separate substance. This simile is what the Consciousness-Only doctrinal eye of this passage's tranquillity-and-insight object hangs upon (a scriptural simile · not set up by the treatise itself). (2) The nine marks of decay of the impure (set up by the treatise itself · marks of the object, not similes) 〔T30 0451c–0452a〕 — the nine marks of bruised-blue · festering · rotted-and-bloated · devoured · the discolored-red · scattered · bone · chain · bone-chain, and the three alterations-and-ruins (of itself · by another · of both kinds), are the object-marks of the contemplation of the impure, set up by the treatise itself, their sequence perfectly ordered; not a figure taken for a simile, but the object of the cultivation of contemplation, recorded as a mark of rhetoric. (3) Malodor / raw stink · dung-filth and scallion-garlic (glossed by the ancients · vehicle of the figure) 〔Dunlun T42 0463c · Kuiji T43 0119a24〕 — glossing the two marks of the impure, "malodor · raw stink," the ancients take "dung and filth (stinking by having decayed) · scallion, garlic, leek, and shallot (stinking the moment they are born)" as the vehicle of the figure, distinguishing the two stinks.
VII. Cross-Reading (Carrying Forward)
- Carrying rubric 5, seclusion · opening rubric 6, one-pointedness: the third of the five things established, "one-pointedness of mind," is just what this leaf opens; Kuiji, glossing the five gateways established down to 「云何心一境性第三」 tr. "what is one-pointedness of mind, the third," enters directly upon this passage 〔T43 0118c〕. The preliminaries (13-03-01) established, the direct cultivation of tranquillity-and-insight begins here.
- The joined operation of tranquillity and insight → the object of skill · the object that purifies the afflictions (pointing forward · to be spoken of later in its own place): this passage's object-of-six-matters is applied only to the five stilling contemplations of the purifying practices (the impure · loving-kindness · dependent origination · elements · breathing); investigating the six matters in dependence on the object of skill (the aggregates, elements, bases, dependent origination, and the possible-and-the-impossible) and the object that purifies the afflictions (the mundane / supramundane paths), the treatise says plainly, 「於其自處我後當說」 tr. "I shall speak of it in its own place" 〔T30 0455b〕 — pointing to the site to be spoken of later (the Ascertainment / the later section), not touched on this leaf.
- The nine mental abidings → the later Maitreya-Asaṅga treatises (carrying forward · stable citation): this passage's nine mental abidings (inner abiding to holding-in-equipoise) are the outline of the "nine mental abidings" carried forward by the later treatises of the Maitreya-Asaṅga lineage (such as the Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra T31n1604 · the Mahāyānasaṃgraha lineage), cited here by stable canon reference, not separately judged.
- One-pointedness of mind · the four insights · the extent- and way-of-being · the joined operation of tranquillity and insight → the Saṃdhinirmocana, Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis (the Consciousness-Only doctrinal eye · cross-reading of scriptural grounds): see Heading III. The object-image that Śrāvaka-Stage tranquillity-and-insight rests upon is judged by the scripture (the Saṃdhinirmocana) to be the appearance of consciousness · the image is nothing but consciousness; this is the in-scripture pivot on which this śrāvaka tranquillity-and-insight communicates with the Consciousness-Only meaning.
VIII. Placement of the Critical Editions
- Base text: CBETA T30n1579 fascicles 30–31 · the third yoga-station · rubric 6, one-pointedness of mind (one-pointedness of mind to the closing knot of the joined operation of tranquillity and insight) 0450b27–0455b15.
- Ancient-master page anchors (all re-verified word-for-word against the canonical text): Dunlun's Notes fascicle 7, latter part, from T42 0462c28 (outline-placement 0462c28 · the six forces, settled abiding running through three forces 0463b11 · the four attentions matched to the seven attentions 0463b23 · loving-kindness "clear from the text" 0464b01 · dependent origination, the Tripiṭaka-master on the drawing-in cause 0464b27 · the impure, malodor and raw stink 0463c · elements, the mother's womb / mindfulness of breathing 0464c · the closing knot of the joined operation of tranquillity and insight 0465a). Jinaputra T30 0884a24 (one line in the prefatory gloss, "śamatha and vipaśyanā, the path of even operation, are called yoga") · no line-by-line dedicated gloss.
- Doctrinal anchor in scripture (all re-verified against the canonical text): the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis, T16n0676 — the four insights, the four-phrase form 0698a11 · the appearance of consciousness 0698b02 · the mirror simile 0698b06 · one-pointedness of mind, penetrating the image 0698b22 · the extent-of-being 0699c15 · the way-of-being 0699c18.
- In-scripture parallel: the Śrāvaka portion of the Section on Ascertainment, T30 0686b01 「有四種法,於所得定為增上緣」 tr. "there are four dharmas that serve as the dominant condition for the meditation gained" (a rubric of 17 items 0686a29), corresponding in part to the six forces · not re-ascertaining the nine abidings, six matters, or four insights (verified word-for-word against the canonical edition).
- Collation: 30 canonical-edition variant-reading collation notes of the Taishō base text for this passage, fully enumerated + 1 original editorial note of the Taishō editors at the fascicle's end (Heading II · all body-text anchors fully placed · the base follows the CBETA character-readings · no note rises to a critical-edition emendation); "zero collation elements" does not equal "no collation notes" (the base's collation notes are recorded in annotation form); the ancients' cited-text variants (malodor / 惡嗅 · raw stink / 生嗅) are not canonical-edition collation notes, recorded only; Paramārtha's fascicle 30, corresponding, is lost · omitted. Missing character: Kuiji's contemplation-of-the-impure passage 「韮䔉」 CB01942/CB05005 (belonging to Kuiji's purifying-of-obstacles passage · at the margin of this leaf's citations · already marked).