瑜伽師地論 三摩呬多地 · 攝諸經宗要·解脫

心要Essence

門五(攝諸經宗要)第一段:收佛經所說八解脫・八勝處・十遍處,理出定力得自在的三級次第。

一句話:解脫、勝處、遍處是定力得自在的三級——解脫「勝解自在」(於境起勝解)、勝處「制伏自在」(拿得住、隨欲觀)、遍處「遍轉自在」(鋪滿一切、隨欲轉變);勝處遍處正是把解脫磨清淨的道。

三個眼目

  1. 八解脫:前七「生勝解」、第八「棄背想受」。前七是於已離染的境再生勝解(為起神通功德),第八是棄背想受(即滅盡定·想受滅)〔窺基 T1829 0076a24〕。觀色用「光明相」而非小乘「不淨想」——離欲只是起點,於色得勝解自在才是所求。經本在《中阿含·大因經》「有八解脫……想知滅解脫」〔T01n0026 0582a17〕(八勝處阿含作八除入・十遍處作一切入處,同法異名)。

  2. 解脫→勝處→遍處=拿穩自在的三級。解脫=勝解自在,勝處=制伏自在(古德引《俱舍》:解脫「唯能棄背」、勝處「能制所緣,隨所樂觀」〔窺基 0078b05〕),遍處=遍轉自在。「勝處、遍處是諸解脫能清淨道」〔攝決擇分 T1579 0645c09〕——勝處遍處不是別法,是磨清淨解脫的道。喻:論本「凡鐵金師」和泥(解脫)→調練(勝處)→隨欲轉變(遍處)〔T1579 0337a·古德從闕〕。

  3. 遍處唯就色觸二處・除火遍處。十遍處唯立色觸(共自他身、遍色界、常相續),餘根色香味聲不遍;除火遍處者,為對治「事火外道以火為天」之執(古德引《涅槃經》三十一)〔窺基 0078c〕。一個遍處的去取,皆有經教之由。

Gate Five (Gathering the Essential Purport of the Sūtras), first section: it gathers up the eight liberations, the eight dominant bases, and the ten totalities as spoken in the Buddha's sūtras, and lays out the threefold sequence by which the power of concentration attains mastery.

In one line: Liberation, the dominant bases, and the totalities are the three ranks by which the power of concentration attains mastery — liberation is "mastery of resolute conviction" (giving rise to resolute conviction upon the object), the dominant bases are "mastery of subjugation" (holding firm, contemplating at will), the totalities are "mastery of pervading transformation" (spreading full across everything, transforming at will); and the dominant bases and the totalities are precisely the path that polishes the liberations to purity.

Three Points of the Eye

  1. The eight liberations: the first seven "give rise to resolute conviction," the eighth "turns its back on perception and feeling." The first seven give rise to resolute conviction once more upon an object already free of defilement (to draw forth the meritorious qualities of the supernormal powers); the eighth turns its back on perception and feeling (i.e., the attainment of cessation, the cessation of perception and feeling) 〔Kuiji T1829 0076a24〕. In contemplating form one uses "the aspect of luminosity," not the Lesser Vehicle's "perception of foulness" — becoming free of desire is only the starting point; attaining mastery of resolute conviction over form is what is sought. The scriptural source lies in the Madhyama-āgama · Great Discourse on Causation, "there are eight liberations … the liberation of the cessation of perception-and-knowing" 〔T01n0026 0582a17〕 (in the Āgamas the eight dominant bases are the "eight bases of overcoming," the ten totalities the "bases of all-pervasion" — the same dharmas under different names).

  2. Liberation → the dominant bases → the totalities = three ranks of grasping mastery firmly. Liberation = mastery of resolute conviction; the dominant bases = mastery of subjugation (the ancient masters cite the Abhidharmakośa: liberation "can only turn its back," the dominant bases "are able to master the object, contemplating however one pleases" 〔Kuiji 0078b05〕); the totalities = mastery of pervading transformation. "The dominant bases and the totalities are the path by which the liberations are made pure" 〔Section on Ascertainment T1579 0645c09〕 — the dominant bases and the totalities are not a separate dharma; they are the path that polishes the liberations to purity. Simile: the treatise's own "ironsmith-goldsmith," blending the clay (liberation) → tempering (the dominant bases) → transforming at will (the totalities) 〔T1579 0337a · the ancient masters give no separate gloss〕.

  3. The totalities are established with respect only to form and the tangible · the fire-totality is left out. The ten totalities are set up only upon form and the tangible (shared by one's own body and others', pervading the form-realm, continuing constantly); the remaining faculty-form, smell, taste, and sound do not pervade. As for leaving out the fire-totality, it is to counter the clinging of "the fire-serving heterodox ones, who take fire to be a god" (the ancient masters cite the Nirvāṇa-sūtra fasc. 31) 〔Kuiji 0078c〕 — the taking-up or leaving-out of a single totality has, in every case, its ground in the scriptural teaching.

原典Canonical · verbatim

云何攝諸經宗要?謂八解脫等。如經廣說。八解脫者,謂如前說有色觀諸色等。前七解脫,於已解脫生勝解故,名為解脫;第八解脫,棄背想受,故名解脫。

云何有色觀諸色?謂生欲界,已離欲界欲,未離色界欲。彼於如是所解脫中已得解脫,即於欲界諸色,以有光明相作意思惟,而生勝解。由二因緣,名為有色。謂生欲界故,得色界定故。又於有光明而作勝解故。 問:觀諸色者,觀何等色?復以何行? 答:欲界諸色。於諸勝處所制少色,若好、若惡、若劣、若勝;如是於多、乃至廣說。何故修習如是觀行?為淨修治能引最勝功德方便。何等名為最勝功德?謂勝處、遍處、諸聖神通、無諍、願智、無礙解等。雖先於彼欲界諸色已得離欲,然於彼色未能證得勝解自在。為證得故,數數於彼思惟勝解。

云何內無色想觀外諸色?謂生欲界,已離色界欲,無色界定不現在前,又不思惟彼想明相,但於外色而作勝解。若於是色已得離欲,說彼為外。由二因緣,名內無色想。謂已證得無色等至,亦自了知得此定故,不思惟內光明相故。餘如前說。

云何淨解脫身作證具足住?謂如有一,已得捨念圓滿清白,以此為依、修習清淨聖行圓滿;名淨解脫。何以故?三因緣故。謂已超過諸苦樂故,一切動亂已寂靜故,善磨瑩故。身作證者,於此住中,一切賢聖多所住故。

云何空無邊處解脫?謂如有一,於彼空處已得離欲,即於虛空思惟勝解。如是識無邊處解脫,於彼識處已得離欲,即於是識思惟勝解。無所有處解脫者,謂已得無所有處,於識無邊處思惟勝解。有頂解脫,更不於餘而作勝解;乃至遍於想可生處,即於是處應作勝解。

復次,先已修治作意勝解、後方能起勝知勝見,故名勝處。此勝當知復有五種。一、形奪卑下,故名為勝。謂如有一,以己勝上工巧等事,形奪他人置下劣位。二、制伏羸劣、故名為勝。謂如有一,以己強力摧諸劣者。三、能隱蔽他,故名為勝。謂瓶盆等能有覆障,或諸藥草呪術神通有所隱蔽。四、厭壞所緣,故名為勝。謂厭壞境界,捨諸煩惱。五、自在迴轉,故名為勝。謂世君王,隨所欲為處分臣僕。於此義中、意顯隱蔽及自在勝。前解脫中勝解自在,今於勝處制伏自在。觀色少者,謂諸有情資具等色。觀色多者,謂諸宮殿房舍等色。言好色者,謂美妙顯色。一向淨妙故。與此相違,名為惡色。言劣色者,謂聲、香、味、觸不可意色。與此相違,當知勝色。此四顯色,有情資具、宮殿等攝。言勝知者,謂數數隱蔽所緣勝解。有如是想者,謂有制伏想也。

復次,由諸遍處、於勝解事生遍勝解,故名遍處。言無二者,謂諸賢聖無我、我所二差別故。言無量者,遍一切故。何故遍處唯就色、觸二處建立?由此二種,共自他身,遍有色界,常相續故。眼等根色唯屬自身,香、味二塵不遍一切;聲聲有間,是故不說如是有色諸遍處。定色界後邊,於無色中,空遍一切,故立遍處。識所行境遍一切故,亦立遍處。

復次,修觀行者,先於所緣思惟勝解;次能制伏;既於制伏得自在已,後即於此遍一切處,如其所欲而作勝解;是故此三如是次第。八色遍處善清淨故,能引賢聖勝解神通,及於諸事轉變神通。如其勝解、隨所轉變,皆能成就;又能變作金銀等物,堪有所用。由識遍處善清淨故,便能引發無諍、願智、無礙解等諸勝功德。由空遍處善清淨故,隨其所欲皆轉成空。譬如世間凡鐵金師,初和泥等,未善調練,解脫位亦爾。如善調練,勝處位亦爾。如調練已,隨欲轉變,遍處位亦爾。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

標起:攝諸經宗要,先釋八解脫

什麼是「攝諸經宗要」?就是〔總標四種裡前面只講了靜慮,此處〕收攝諸經,講八解脫等(如經中廣說)。

八解脫,就是前面〔總標〕所說「有色觀諸色」等八種。前七解脫,是「於已解脫〔的境〕生起勝解」,所以名為解脫;第八解脫,是「棄背想、受」,所以名為解脫。

八解脫

一、有色觀諸色:生在欲界、已離欲界欲、還沒離色界欲的人,於那已解脫的境中已得解脫,便對欲界諸色以「有光明相」作意思惟而生勝解。由二因緣名為「有色」:一是生在欲界、又得了色界定,二是於有光明而作勝解。  問:觀諸色,觀的是什麼色?又以什麼行相觀?答:觀欲界諸色——就是諸勝處所制的少色,或好或惡、或劣或勝,乃至於多(廣說)。為什麼修這觀行?為了淨修治、引發最勝功德的方便。什麼是最勝功德?就是勝處、遍處、諸聖神通、無諍、願智、無礙解等。雖然先前對那欲界諸色已得離欲,可是對那色還未能證得「勝解自在」,為了證得,所以數數於彼思惟勝解。

二、內無色想觀外諸色:生在欲界、已離色界欲、無色界定不現前、又不思惟那〔光〕想明相,只對外色而作勝解的人。對這色已得離欲,所以說它為「外」。由二因緣名「內無色想」:一是已證得無色等至、也自知得了此定,二是不思惟內光明相。其餘如前所說。

三、淨解脫身作證具足住:如有一人,已得「捨念圓滿清白」,以此為依、修習清淨聖行圓滿,名「淨解脫」。為什麼?三因緣故:已超過諸苦樂、一切動亂已寂靜、善磨瑩〔淨〕故。「身作證」,是於此住中一切賢聖多所安住。

四至七、四無色解脫:「空無邊處解脫」——對那空處已得離欲,便於虛空思惟勝解。如是「識無邊處解脫」——對那識處已離欲,便於是識思惟勝解。「無所有處解脫」——已得無所有處,於識無邊處思惟勝解。「有頂(非想非非想處)解脫」——更不於其餘而作勝解;乃至遍於想可生之處,即於是處應作勝解。

〔第八「想受滅解脫」即上文「棄背想受」,下三摩缽底門廣之。〕

八勝處:勝在「制伏自在」

再者,先已修治作意勝解、後才能起「勝知勝見」,所以名「勝處」。這「勝」當知有五種:

  • 一、形奪卑下故名勝——如有一人,以自己勝過的工巧等事,把他人形奪、壓到下劣位。
  • 二、制伏羸劣故名勝——如有一人,以自己強力摧伏諸劣者。
  • 三、能隱蔽他故名勝——如瓶盆等能覆障,或諸藥草、呪術、神通有所隱蔽。
  • 四、厭壞所緣故名勝——厭壞境界,捨諸煩惱。
  • 五、自在迴轉故名勝——如世間君王,隨所欲而處分臣僕。

於此義中,意在顯「隱蔽」與「自在」二勝。前面解脫中是「勝解自在」,如今勝處中是「制伏自在」。  觀色少的,是諸有情的資具等色;觀色多的,是諸宮殿房舍等色。「好色」是美妙顯色(一向淨妙);與此相違名「惡色」。「劣色」是聲、香、味、觸不可意之色;與此相違當知是「勝色」。這四種顯色,攝在有情資具、宮殿等中。所謂「勝知」,是數數隱蔽所緣的勝解。所謂「有如是想」,是有「制伏想」。

十遍處:遍在「遍勝解」

再者,由諸遍處對「勝解事」生起「遍勝解」,所以名「遍處」。所謂「無二」,是諸賢聖無「我、我所」二種差別;所謂「無量」,是遍一切。  為什麼遍處只就「色、觸」二處建立?因為這二種共自他身、遍有色界、常相續;眼等根色只屬自身,香、味二塵不遍一切,聲又有間斷,所以不說它們為有色諸遍處。〔遍處〕定在色界後邊,至於無色中,「空」遍一切故立空遍處,「識」所行境遍一切故亦立識遍處。

三位次第:解脫→勝處→遍處(凡鐵金師喻)

再者,修觀行的人,先於所緣思惟勝解(解脫位);次能制伏(勝處位);既於制伏得自在後,便於此遍一切處、如其所欲而作勝解(遍處位)——所以這三者如是次第。  八色遍處善清淨故,能引賢聖的勝解神通、及於諸事轉變的神通——隨其勝解、隨所轉變皆能成就,又能變作金銀等物堪可受用。由識遍處善清淨故,便能引發無諍、願智、無礙解等諸勝功德。由空遍處善清淨故,隨其所欲皆轉成空。  譬如世間打鐵鑄金的工匠:起初和泥等、還沒善加調練——解脫位也這樣;等到善加調練——勝處位也這樣;調練好了、隨欲轉變——遍處位也這樣。

The 漢 root text (Xuanzang, T30n1579) is kept as a de-emphasized visual anchor for bilingual readers; the English below renders every word of it in plain, continuous prose.


Setting the Theme: Gathering the Essential Purport of the Sūtras — First, an Account of the Eight Liberations

What is "Gathering the Essential Purport of the Sūtras"? It is 〔the general heading has set out four kinds, of which only meditative absorption (dhyāna) has been expounded so far; here〕 the gathering-together of the sūtras, expounding the eight liberations and the like (as is set forth at length in the sūtras).

The eight liberations are the eight kinds spoken of earlier 〔in the general heading〕, "having material form, one contemplates material forms," and so on. The first seven liberations are named "liberation" because, with respect to what is already liberated 〔as an object〕, one gives rise to a resolute conviction; the eighth liberation is named "liberation" because it turns its back on and casts off perception and feeling.

云何攝諸經宗要?謂八解脫等。如經廣說。八解脫者,謂如前說有色觀諸色等。前七解脫,於已解脫生勝解故,名為解脫;第八解脫,棄背想受,故名解脫。

The Eight Liberations

One: Having material form, one contemplates material forms. This is the person who is born in the desire-realm, who has already become free of desire for the desire-realm, but who has not yet become free of desire for the form-realm; within that which is already liberated 〔as an object〕, he has already attained liberation, and so, toward the material forms of the desire-realm, he applies attention and reflects with "the aspect of luminosity," and gives rise to a resolute conviction. By two causes and conditions it is named "having material form": first, because he is born in the desire-realm and has moreover attained the concentration of the form-realm; and second, because he forms a resolute conviction upon that which has luminosity.

云何有色觀諸色?謂生欲界,已離欲界欲,未離色界欲。彼於如是所解脫中已得解脫,即於欲界諸色,以有光明相作意思惟,而生勝解。由二因緣,名為有色。謂生欲界故,得色界定故。又於有光明而作勝解故。

Question: When one contemplates material forms, what sort of forms does one contemplate? And by what mode 〔of apprehension〕? Answer: The material forms of the desire-realm — that is, the small amount of form marked off within the various dominant bases, whether fair or foul, whether inferior or superior; and likewise a large amount, and so on (as set forth at length). Why does one cultivate such a contemplative practice? For the sake of the skillful means that thoroughly purifies and refines, and that is able to draw forth the most excellent meritorious qualities. What are called the most excellent meritorious qualities? They are the dominant bases, the totalities, the various noble supernormal powers, the [meditation on] non-contention, the knowledge born of vow, the unobstructed analytical knowledges, and the like. Although one has already become free of desire toward those material forms of the desire-realm, one has not yet been able to realize mastery of resolute conviction over that form. In order to realize it, one reflects again and again with resolute conviction upon it.

問:觀諸色者,觀何等色?復以何行? 答:欲界諸色。於諸勝處所制少色,若好、若惡、若劣、若勝;如是於多、乃至廣說。何故修習如是觀行?為淨修治能引最勝功德方便。何等名為最勝功德?謂勝處、遍處、諸聖神通、無諍、願智、無礙解等。雖先於彼欲界諸色已得離欲,然於彼色未能證得勝解自在。為證得故,數數於彼思惟勝解。

Two: Inwardly without perception of form, one contemplates outward material forms. This is the person who is born in the desire-realm, who has already become free of desire for the form-realm, before whom the concentration of the formless realm is not present, and who moreover does not reflect upon the aspect of luminosity of those 〔form〕 perceptions, but forms a resolute conviction only upon outward form. Because he has already become free of desire toward that form, it is called "outward." By two causes and conditions it is named "inwardly without perception of form": first, because he has already realized the formless attainments and moreover himself clearly knows that he has attained this concentration; and second, because he does not reflect upon the inward aspect of luminosity. The rest is as stated before.

云何內無色想觀外諸色?謂生欲界,已離色界欲,無色界定不現在前,又不思惟彼想明相,但於外色而作勝解。若於是色已得離欲,說彼為外。由二因緣,名內無色想。謂已證得無色等至,亦自了知得此定故,不思惟內光明相故。餘如前說。

Three: The pure liberation, realized bodily, dwelt in complete. This is as when there is one who has already attained "equanimity and mindfulness, full, pure, and clear," and, taking this as his support, cultivates the pure noble practice to completion; this is named "the pure liberation." Why so? For three causes and conditions: because he has already passed beyond all pain and pleasure; because all agitation is already stilled; and because it is well polished 〔to purity〕. As for "realized bodily": within this dwelling, all the worthy ones and noble ones abide much.

云何淨解脫身作證具足住?謂如有一,已得捨念圓滿清白,以此為依、修習清淨聖行圓滿;名淨解脫。何以故?三因緣故。謂已超過諸苦樂故,一切動亂已寂靜故,善磨瑩故。身作證者,於此住中,一切賢聖多所住故。

Four through Seven: The four formless liberations. "The liberation of the sphere of boundless space" — with respect to that sphere of space one has already become free of desire, and so one reflects with resolute conviction upon empty space. In the same way, "the liberation of the sphere of boundless consciousness" — with respect to that sphere of consciousness one has already become free of desire, and so one reflects with resolute conviction upon this consciousness. As for "the liberation of the sphere of nothing-whatever" — this is when, having already attained the sphere of nothing-whatever, one reflects with resolute conviction upon the sphere of boundless consciousness. "The liberation of the summit of existence (neither-perception-nor-non-perception)" — one forms a resolute conviction upon nothing further; indeed, wherever perception may arise, right there one should form a resolute conviction.

云何空無邊處解脫?謂如有一,於彼空處已得離欲,即於虛空思惟勝解。如是識無邊處解脫,於彼識處已得離欲,即於是識思惟勝解。無所有處解脫者,謂已得無所有處,於識無邊處思惟勝解。有頂解脫,更不於餘而作勝解;乃至遍於想可生處,即於是處應作勝解。

〔The eighth, "the liberation of the cessation of perception and feeling," is the "turning its back on and casting off perception and feeling" of the passage above; it is expounded at length under the section-gate of the equipoise-attainments (samāpatti) below.〕

The Eight Dominant Bases: Their Excellence Lies in "Mastery of Subjugation"

Further: only after one has already refined the resolute conviction of applied attention can one then give rise to "excellent knowing and excellent seeing"; and so they are named "dominant bases." This "excellence" should be understood as of five kinds:

復次,先已修治作意勝解、後方能起勝知勝見,故名勝處。此勝當知復有五種。

  • One, outclassing the lowly — hence named excellent. This is as when there is one who, by his own superior skill in craft and the like, outclasses another and sets him in an inferior, lowly position.

一、形奪卑下,故名為勝。謂如有一,以己勝上工巧等事,形奪他人置下劣位。

  • Two, subjugating the feeble — hence named excellent. This is as when there is one who, by his own strong might, crushes the various feeble ones.

二、制伏羸劣、故名為勝。謂如有一,以己強力摧諸劣者。

  • Three, being able to conceal others — hence named excellent. This is as a jar, a basin, and the like are able to cover and screen 〔things〕, or as the various medicinal herbs, spells, and supernormal powers effect a concealing.

三、能隱蔽他,故名為勝。謂瓶盆等能有覆障,或諸藥草呪術神通有所隱蔽。

  • Four, wearying-and-wearing-down the object — hence named excellent. This is to weary-and-wear-down the object-realm and to cast off the various afflictions.

四、厭壞所緣,故名為勝。謂厭壞境界,捨諸煩惱。

  • Five, turning-and-wheeling with mastery — hence named excellent. This is as a king of the world disposes of his ministers and servants according to whatever he wishes.

五、自在迴轉,故名為勝。謂世君王,隨所欲為處分臣僕。

Within this meaning, the intent is to display the two excellences of "concealing" and "mastery." In the liberation earlier, it was "mastery of resolute conviction"; now, in the dominant bases, it is "mastery of subjugation."

於此義中、意顯隱蔽及自在勝。前解脫中勝解自在,今於勝處制伏自在。

 "Contemplating a small amount of form" means the forms such as the goods and requisites of sentient beings. "Contemplating a large amount of form" means the forms such as palaces and dwelling-houses. What is called "fair form" is beautiful and marvelous visible color, because it is wholly pure and fine; what stands contrary to this is named "foul form." What is called "inferior form" is the disagreeable form of sound, smell, taste, and the tangible; what stands contrary to this should be understood as "superior form." These four kinds of visible color are subsumed under the goods and requisites of sentient beings, the palaces, and the like. What is called "excellent knowing" is the resolute conviction that again and again conceals the object. What is called "having such a perception" is having the perception of subjugation.

觀色少者,謂諸有情資具等色。觀色多者,謂諸宮殿房舍等色。言好色者,謂美妙顯色。一向淨妙故。與此相違,名為惡色。言劣色者,謂聲、香、味、觸不可意色。與此相違,當知勝色。此四顯色,有情資具、宮殿等攝。言勝知者,謂數數隱蔽所緣勝解。有如是想者,謂有制伏想也。

The Ten Totalities: Their Pervasion Lies in "Pervading Resolute Conviction"

Further: because, through the various totalities, one gives rise to a "pervading resolute conviction" upon the object of resolute conviction, they are named "totalities." What is called "without duality" is that the worthy ones and noble ones are without the two distinctions of "self and what belongs to self"; what is called "measureless" is that it pervades everything.

復次,由諸遍處、於勝解事生遍勝解,故名遍處。言無二者,謂諸賢聖無我、我所二差別故。言無量者,遍一切故。

 Why are the totalities established with respect only to the two bases of form and the tangible? Because these two kinds are shared by one's own body and others' bodies, pervade the whole form-realm, and continue on constantly. The form of the eye-faculty and the rest belongs to one's own body alone; the two objects of smell and taste do not pervade everything; and sound, moreover, has intervals. For this reason they are not spoken of as the "totalities of material form." 〔The totalities〕 are fixed at the far edge of the form-realm; as for within the formless, because "space" pervades everything, the space-totality is established, and because the object-field ranged over by "consciousness" pervades everything, the consciousness-totality is likewise established.

何故遍處唯就色、觸二處建立?由此二種,共自他身,遍有色界,常相續故。眼等根色唯屬自身,香、味二塵不遍一切;聲聲有間,是故不說如是有色諸遍處。定色界後邊,於無色中,空遍一切,故立遍處。識所行境遍一切故,亦立遍處。

The Sequence of the Three Positions: Liberation → Dominant Bases → Totalities (the Simile of the Ironsmith-Goldsmith)

Further: the one who cultivates contemplative practice first reflects with resolute conviction upon the object (the position of liberation); next he is able to subjugate it (the position of the dominant bases); and having attained mastery over subjugation, he then, upon this, pervading everything, forms a resolute conviction according to whatever he wishes (the position of the totalities) — and so these three run in this sequence.

復次,修觀行者,先於所緣思惟勝解;次能制伏;既於制伏得自在已,後即於此遍一切處,如其所欲而作勝解;是故此三如是次第。

 Because the eight form-totalities are well purified, they are able to draw forth the resolute-conviction supernormal power of the worthy ones and noble ones, and the supernormal power of transforming the various things; according to one's resolute conviction, according to what one transforms, all can be accomplished; and one is moreover able to transform-and-make gold, silver, and the like, fit to be put to some use. Because the consciousness-totality is well purified, one becomes able to draw forth the various excellent meritorious qualities such as the [meditation on] non-contention, the knowledge born of vow, and the unobstructed analytical knowledges. Because the space-totality is well purified, according to whatever one wishes, all is turned into space.

八色遍處善清淨故,能引賢聖勝解神通,及於諸事轉變神通。如其勝解、隨所轉變,皆能成就;又能變作金銀等物,堪有所用。由識遍處善清淨故,便能引發無諍、願智、無礙解等諸勝功德。由空遍處善清淨故,隨其所欲皆轉成空。

 It is like the ironsmith-goldsmith of the world: at first he blends the clay and so forth, not yet well tempered — the position of liberation is likewise; when it is well tempered — the position of the dominant bases is likewise; when the tempering is done, and he transforms it according to his wish — the position of the totalities is likewise.

譬如世間凡鐵金師,初和泥等,未善調練,解脫位亦爾。如善調練,勝處位亦爾。如調練已,隨欲轉變,遍處位亦爾。

義疏Exposition

為什麼到這一門才講解脫、勝處、遍處

總標早把定學的四種攤開了——靜慮、解脫、等持、等至。可前面幾門只把「靜慮」講細了,解脫、等持、等至一直按著沒展開。到這「攝諸經宗要」門,論才把後三種一一釋出。古德點明了這個體例:「於安立門,唯解靜慮,不解解脫、等持、等至,下宗要中方釋三故」(遁倫《論記》)。而且這一門有個特別處——它釋的是「諸經宗要」,也就是說,八解脫、八勝處、十遍處這些,本來都是散在佛經(阿含修多羅)裡的法相,論在這裡是把諸經之要收攏來、一一講明。所以讀這一門,要記得:它講的不是論主新立的東西,是佛在經裡早說的定法。八解脫的經本,就在《中阿含·大因經》——「有八解脫……想知滅解脫身作證成就遊,是謂第八解脫」;八勝處在阿含叫「八除入」、十遍處叫「一切入處」,同法異名而已。

八解脫:前七「生勝解」、第八「棄背想受」

八解脫,論一句就點出它兩段的分界:「前七解脫,於已解脫生勝解故,名為解脫;第八解脫,棄背想受,故名解脫。」古德把這兩種「解脫」之名說透了(窺基《略纂》):前七,是「所觀法要離彼地煩惱障染方始修作」——也就是說,先得離了那一地的染,才修這觀、於已解脫的境再「生勝解」(為除定障、起神通功德);第八則不同,是「棄背想受」——前面遠遠的無間道雖已滅了想受障,要到此刻「正起解脫時,暫棄背想受」才立解脫之名。一個「生勝解」、一個「棄背」,前七是在已淨的境上更起妙用,第八是把想受整個放下——這第八,正是後面要講的滅盡定(想受滅)。

論講第一解脫「有色觀諸色」時,還順手破了個誤會。它說觀欲界諸色,是「以有光明相作意思惟」——古德特別提醒:這跟小乘不一樣,「不同小乘作不淨想,今此說觀光明想故」(窺基)。同是觀色,小乘觀不淨以離染,這裡卻是於已離染的色上、以光明相起勝解,為的是「證得勝解自在」。離欲只是起點,於色得自在才是這一解脫要的。(附帶一則古德的版本案:「內無色想觀外諸色」的「內」字,玄奘三藏說「梵本經論竝無內字,譯加內字義亦無妨」(遁倫)——一個字的去取,三藏交代得清清楚楚。)

八勝處:解脫是「勝解自在」,勝處是「制伏自在」

解脫之後是勝處。論說:「先已修治作意勝解、後方能起勝知勝見,故名勝處」——先有了解脫位的勝解,才進到勝處位的「勝知勝見」。論列了「五種勝」(形奪卑下、制伏羸劣、能隱蔽他、厭壞所緣、自在迴轉),還特別說:這五種裡,意在顯「隱蔽」與「自在」二勝。

那勝處跟解脫到底差在哪?論一句話劃開:「前解脫中勝解自在,今於勝處制伏自在。」古德引《俱舍》把這一刀講得更利(窺基):「前修解脫,唯能棄背;後修勝處,能制所緣,隨所樂觀,或終不起」——解脫位只能「棄背」(背過境去),勝處位卻能「制所緣」(把境拿在手裡,要怎麼觀就怎麼觀、要它不起就不起)。古德接著說:勝處修成滿了,「由八勝處勝伏所緣,能令初三解脫清淨」(窺基)。原來勝處不是另起爐灶,它是回頭把前三解脫「磨乾淨」的功夫。從「背得過」到「拿得住」,定力上了一級。

十遍處:從「拿得住」到「鋪得滿」

勝處之後是遍處。論說由諸遍處「於勝解事生遍勝解,故名遍處」——把那勝解,鋪滿一切處。這裡論問了個好問題:十遍處(地水火風青黃赤白空識)裡,前八明明是色,為什麼「遍處唯就色、觸二處建立」?論答:因為色觸這二種「共自他身、遍有色界、常相續」;眼等根色只屬自身、香味二塵不遍一切、聲又有間斷,所以不立它們為遍處。古德順著補了一條經案:何故十遍處裡「除火」?因為「事火外道以火為天、說火體遍」,若立火遍處便增長外道的執,所以佛對那種人「除火遍處」(窺基引《涅槃經》三十一)——一個遍處的去取,竟是為對治外道而設。

三位一條線:和泥、調練、隨欲轉變

論最後把解脫、勝處、遍處串成一條修生的線,並用一個極家常的喻收住:「修觀行者,先於所緣思惟勝解(解脫);次能制伏(勝處);既於制伏得自在已,後即於此遍一切處、如其所欲而作勝解(遍處)。」古德也引六十三、顯揚印證:「勝處、遍處是諸解脫能清淨道」(窺基;攝決擇分同)——勝處遍處不是解脫之外的別法,正是把解脫磨清淨的道。

那喻是論本自己設的:「譬如世間凡鐵金師,初和泥等,未善調練,解脫位亦爾;如善調練,勝處位亦爾;如調練已,隨欲轉變,遍處位亦爾」。一個鑄工:起初只是和泥備料、還沒煉熟——這是解脫位,剛能於境起勝解;煉熟了、火候到了——這是勝處位,能把材料拿穩制伏;煉好了、要打成什麼就打成什麼——這是遍處位,隨欲轉變、遍一切處。同一團定力,從「備得料」到「煉得熟」到「打得隨心」,一級一級拿穩了自在。論講解脫,講的從來不只是「離」,是離了之後,於境一步步得大自在。

承衍

解脫子段,是「攝諸經宗要」門的第一段,把佛經裡的八解脫、八勝處(八除入)、十遍處(一切入處)這幾組定法收攏講明,並理出一條修生的線:解脫(勝解自在)→勝處(制伏自在)→遍處(遍轉自在),勝處遍處是磨清淨解脫的道。其中第八解脫「棄背想受」,正是後面三摩缽底子段要細講的滅盡定——想受滅而識不離身,下接唯識第八識執持之義。攝諸經宗要門的後二段,要繼續展開的是「等持」(三三摩地等十三目)與「三摩缽底」(現見、無想、滅盡)——都是這座定地上,諸經所攝的一個個具體勝定。

Why Only at This Gate Are Liberation, the Dominant Bases, and the Totalities Expounded

The general heading has long since laid open the four kinds that make up the training in concentration — meditative absorption (dhyāna), liberation, concentrative poise (samādhi), and the equipoise-attainments (samāpatti). But the earlier gates gave a detailed exposition only of "meditative absorption," while liberation, concentrative poise, and the equipoise-attainments were all held back, unopened. It is at this "Gathering the Essential Purport of the Sūtras" gate that the treatise at last expounds the latter three, one by one. The ancient masters have made this arrangement plain: "Under the gate of establishment, only meditative absorption was expounded, and not liberation, concentrative poise, and the equipoise-attainments — for it is under Gathering the Purport below that the three are expounded" 〔Dunlun, Notes〕. And this gate has a distinctive feature: what it expounds is "the essential purport of the sūtras" — which is to say, the eight liberations, the eight dominant bases, and the ten totalities are all, at root, dharma-characteristics scattered throughout the Buddha's sūtras (the Āgama discourses); here the treatise gathers up the essentials of those sūtras and makes each plain. So in reading this gate, we should remember: what it expounds is not something newly set up by the author of the treatise, but the concentration-dharmas that the Buddha long ago spoke in the sūtras. The scriptural source of the eight liberations lies in the Madhyama-āgama · Great Discourse on Causation — "there are eight liberations … the liberation of the cessation of perception-and-knowing, realized bodily and dwelt in complete, this is called the eighth liberation". In the Āgamas the eight dominant bases are called "the eight bases of overcoming," and the ten totalities "the bases of all-pervasion" — the same dharmas under different names.

The Eight Liberations: The First Seven "Give Rise to Resolute Conviction," the Eighth "Turns Its Back on Perception and Feeling"

For the eight liberations, the treatise in a single stroke points out the dividing line of its two parts: "The first seven liberations are named 'liberation' because, with respect to what is already liberated, they give rise to resolute conviction; the eighth liberation is named 'liberation' because it turns its back on and casts off perception and feeling." The ancient masters have spoken through to the bottom of these two senses of the name "liberation" 〔Kuiji, Concise Compendium〕: for the first seven, "the dharma to be contemplated must first become free of the affliction-obstruction defilements of that ground before one begins to cultivate the practice" — that is to say, one first becomes free of the defilement of that particular ground, and only then cultivates this contemplation, giving rise once more to "resolute conviction" upon the object already liberated (in order to remove the concentration-obstruction and to draw forth the meritorious qualities of the supernormal powers); the eighth is otherwise — it "turns its back on and casts off perception and feeling" — for although the far-off uninterrupted path earlier had already extinguished the obstruction of perception-and-feeling, it is only at this present moment, "when one actually gives rise to liberation and momentarily turns its back on perception and feeling," that the name "liberation" is established. One is a "giving rise to resolute conviction," the other a "turning its back": the first seven raise a further marvelous function upon an already-purified object, while the eighth sets down perception and feeling altogether — and this eighth is precisely the attainment of cessation (the cessation of perception and feeling) to be expounded further on.

When the treatise expounds the first liberation, "having material form, one contemplates material forms," it moreover, in passing, breaks a misunderstanding. It says that to contemplate the material forms of the desire-realm is to "apply attention and reflect with the aspect of luminosity" — and the ancient masters give a special reminder: this is not the same as the Lesser Vehicle, "for it is unlike the Lesser Vehicle's forming of the perception of foulness; here it speaks of contemplating the perception of luminosity" 〔Kuiji〕. It is the same contemplation of form, but where the Lesser Vehicle contemplates foulness in order to become free of defilement, here one gives rise to resolute conviction, with the aspect of luminosity, upon form from which one is already free of defilement — the aim being "to realize mastery of resolute conviction." Becoming free of desire is only the starting point; attaining mastery over form is what this liberation is after. (There is, besides, a textual note from the ancient masters: as to the character "inward" in "inwardly without perception of form, one contemplates outward material forms," the Tripiṭaka-master Xuanzang said, "the Sanskrit sūtra and treatise both have no character 'inward'; adding the character 'inward' in translation does no harm to the sense either" 〔Dunlun〕 — over the taking-up or leaving-out of a single character, the Tripiṭaka-master gives an account perfectly clear.)

The Eight Dominant Bases: Liberation Is "Mastery of Resolute Conviction," the Dominant Bases Are "Mastery of Subjugation"

After liberation come the dominant bases. The treatise says: "Only after one has already refined the resolute conviction of applied attention can one then give rise to excellent knowing and excellent seeing; and so they are named dominant bases" — first there is the resolute conviction of the liberation-position, and only then does one advance to the "excellent knowing and excellent seeing" of the dominant-bases-position. The treatise lists "five kinds of excellence" (outclassing the lowly, subjugating the feeble, being able to conceal others, wearying-and-wearing-down the object, turning-and-wheeling with mastery), and further says: among these five, the intent is to display the two excellences of "concealing" and "mastery."

So wherein, exactly, do the dominant bases differ from liberation? The treatise cleaves it apart in a single line: "In the liberation earlier it was mastery of resolute conviction; now, in the dominant bases, it is mastery of subjugation." The ancient masters, citing the Abhidharmakośa, make this stroke keener still 〔Kuiji〕: "In cultivating liberation earlier, one could only turn one's back; in cultivating the dominant bases after, one is able to master the object — contemplating however one pleases, or in the end not giving rise to it at all" — the liberation-position can only "turn its back" (turn away from the object-realm), whereas the dominant-bases-position is able to "master the object" (to hold the object-realm in hand, to contemplate it however one wishes, and to make it not arise if one wishes it not to arise). The ancient masters go on to say: when the dominant bases are cultivated to fullness, "by the eight dominant bases subjugating the object, one is able to make the first three liberations pure" 〔Kuiji〕. So the dominant bases are not a fresh start on new ground; they are the work that turns back and "polishes clean" the first three liberations. From "being able to turn one's back" to "being able to hold firm," the power of concentration has climbed a rank.

The Ten Totalities: From "Holding Firm" to "Spreading Full"

After the dominant bases come the totalities. The treatise says that through the various totalities one "gives rise to a pervading resolute conviction upon the object of resolute conviction, and so they are named totalities" — to spread that resolute conviction full across everything. Here the treatise asks a fine question: among the ten totalities (earth, water, fire, wind, blue, yellow, red, white, space, consciousness), the first eight are plainly form — why then are "the totalities established with respect only to the two bases of form and the tangible"? The treatise answers: because these two, form and the tangible, are "shared by one's own body and others' bodies, pervade the whole form-realm, and continue on constantly"; the form of the eye-faculty and the rest belongs to one's own body alone, the two objects of smell and taste do not pervade everything, and sound, moreover, has intervals — and so they are not set up as totalities. The ancient masters, following on, supply a further scriptural note: why, among the ten totalities, is "fire left out"? Because "the fire-serving heterodox ones take fire to be a god, and say that the substance of fire pervades"; were a fire-totality established, it would foster the clinging of the heterodox, and so, for such persons, the Buddha "left out the fire-totality" 〔Kuiji, citing the Nirvāṇa-sūtra〕 — the taking-up or leaving-out of a single totality turns out to be set for the sake of countering the heterodox.

The Three Positions on a Single Line: Blending the Clay, Tempering, Transforming at Will

The treatise, at the last, strings liberation, the dominant bases, and the totalities into a single line of practice-and-production, and closes it off with a thoroughly homely simile: "The one who cultivates contemplative practice first reflects with resolute conviction upon the object (liberation); next he is able to subjugate it (the dominant bases); and having attained mastery over subjugation, he then, upon this, pervading everything, forms a resolute conviction according to whatever he wishes (the totalities)." The ancient masters likewise cite fascicle sixty-three and the Xianyang in confirmation: "The dominant bases and the totalities are the path by which the liberations are made pure" 〔Kuiji; the Section on Ascertainment agrees〕 — the dominant bases and the totalities are not some separate dharma outside the liberations; they are precisely the path that polishes the liberations to purity.

And the simile is one the treatise sets up on its own: "It is like the ironsmith-goldsmith of the world: at first he blends the clay and so forth, not yet well tempered — the position of liberation is likewise; when it is well tempered — the position of the dominant bases is likewise; when the tempering is done, and he transforms it according to his wish — the position of the totalities is likewise". A smith: at first he only blends the clay and readies his stock, not yet fired to temper — this is the liberation-position, where one is just able to give rise to resolute conviction upon the object; once fired to temper, the heat brought to its point — this is the dominant-bases-position, where one is able to hold the material firm and subjugate it; once tempered, so that whatever he would beat it into, into that it is beaten — this is the totality-position, transforming at will, pervading everything. It is one and the same body of concentration-power: from "readying the stock" to "firing to temper" to "beating out as the heart wills," rank by rank it grasps mastery firmly. When the treatise expounds liberation, what it expounds is never merely "becoming free"; it is, having become free, attaining a great mastery over the object-realm, step by step.

Carrying Forward

The Liberation sub-section is the first section of the "Gathering the Essential Purport of the Sūtras" gate; it gathers up and makes plain those several groups of concentration-dharmas from the Buddha's sūtras — the eight liberations, the eight dominant bases (the eight bases of overcoming), and the ten totalities (the bases of all-pervasion) — and lays out a single line of practice-and-production: liberation (mastery of resolute conviction) → the dominant bases (mastery of subjugation) → the totalities (mastery of pervading transformation), with the dominant bases and the totalities as the path that polishes the liberations to purity. Among them, the eighth liberation, "turning its back on and casting off perception and feeling," is precisely the attainment of cessation (the cessation of perception and feeling) that the equipoise-attainment sub-section further on will expound in detail — where perception and feeling cease and yet consciousness does not depart from the body, connecting downward to the Consciousness-Only sense of the eighth consciousness that appropriates and holds. The remaining two sections of the Gathering-the-Purport gate go on to unfold "concentrative poise" (the three concentrative poises and the rest, some thirteen items) and "the equipoise-attainments" (the attainment of manifest seeing, the attainment of no-perception, the attainment of cessation) — each of them one of the concrete, excellent concentrations gathered from the sūtras upon this same ground of concentration.

考據Apparatus

攝諸經宗要門(嗢拕南門五)攝諸經之要,總標四種中靜慮前已釋,此門方釋解脫・等持・等至三;本子段釋第一「解脫」——八解脫・八勝處・十遍處・三位次第。其八解脫等本攝阿含修多羅(論云「如經廣說」),故經先於論。


一、科判定位

攝諸經宗要為三摩呬多地嗢拕南門五。古德科判〔窺基《略纂》T43n1829 0075c02〕:宗要釋「靜慮・解脫・等持・等至」中後三(靜慮前已釋);分三:解脫・等持・等至。解脫門復四:釋解脫・釋勝處・釋遍處・總料簡〔窺基 0075c08;遁倫 T1828 0389b12〕。遁倫並注勝處遍處「準前標說在等至門,今依修生次第,次解脫而明之」〔T1828 0389b16〕。

最勝子《釋》T1580 於本門全從闕(序釋止 0888a03)。


二、異譯·經內平行對勘

  • 古譯:真諦《十七地論》不及卷12,且佚——本子段無真諦異譯,從闕。
  • 經內平行=攝決擇分三摩呬多地決擇(卷62):解脫決擇之要——「修十遍處能為五事」〔T30n1579 0645b28「若觀行者修十遍處,能為五事……由修習地遍處等乃至白遍處故,便能引發化事、變事諸聖神通……」〕,並決「勝處、遍處是諸解脫能清淨道。又諸解脫,由所知障解脫所顯」〔0645c09〕,及「想受滅解脫,最勝住所攝」〔0645c07〕——正本子段三位次第(勝處遍處清淨解脫)及第八解脫(想受滅)之決擇。
  • 校勘(大正原書校記全枚舉):本子段(0336b12–0337a26)大正原書校記共 2 條<app> 校勘元素雖 0,原書校記以註記形式收錄——「校勘元素零」不等於「無校記」)。底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印);本子段無一條升定本案,異讀並錄備考。真諦本佚,無異譯對勘:
註號底本【大】異讀語境
03370010337a11聞【宋】【元】【明】聲聲有間,是故不說(間/聞)
03370020337a23瓦【宋】【元】【明】【宮】世間凡鐵金師(凡/瓦)

全 2 條底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印),無升定本案。


三、聖教義之經據(眼)

解脫・勝處・遍處本攝阿含修多羅(論云「如經廣說」),其經源具在藏中(阿含經源旁徵):

(一) 八解脫——《中阿含·大因經》〔T01n0026 0582a17,瞿曇僧伽提婆譯〕:

「有八解脫。云何為八?色觀色,是謂第一解脫……度一切非有想非無想處,想知滅解脫身作證成就遊,及慧觀諸漏盡知,是謂第八解脫。」

第八「想知滅解脫」正論本「棄背想受」之經本。亦見《長阿含·眾集經》〔T01n0001 0056a14〕。

(二) 八勝處(阿含作「八除入」)——《長阿含·眾集經》〔T01n0001 0055c26,佛陀耶舍共竺佛念譯〕:「八除入:內有色想,觀外色少,若好若醜……」十遍處(阿含作「一切入處」,《中阿含》作「十一切處」)——《雜阿含》〔T02n0099 0143a18,求那跋陀羅譯〕:「地一切入處……乃至識一切入處」(地水火風青黃赤白空識十);《中阿含》同法作「十一切處」〔T01n0026 0800b03〕。

阿含經名與論本異:八勝處=八除入(長阿含)・十遍處=一切入處(雜阿含)/十一切處(中阿含)——同法異名,論本(玄奘譯)用後出定名。

(三) 解深密・成唯識(輕)——解深密《地波羅蜜多品》僅一語及之「如實知解脫、勝處、及與遍處,或修或遣」〔T16n0676 0702c20〕;成唯識論無八解脫,但「想受滅」為第六無為〔T31n1585 0006c15〕、滅盡定「偏厭受、想」〔0037c12〕——皆第八解脫(想受滅)之論承(接三摩缽底子段)。


四、諸家異釋(古德·標宗)

八解脫立名(窺基・遁倫)

前七・第八立名〔窺基《略纂》T43n1829 0076a24;遁倫 T1828 0390a12〕:

「『前七解脫,於已解脫生勝解』者,七所觀法要離彼地煩惱障染方始修作,名已解脫……『第八解脫棄背想受』者,前遠無間道雖滅想受障,今方得名解脫。」

有色二因緣(生欲界得色界定・於光明而作勝解;「不同小乘作不淨想,今此說觀光明想故」)〔窺基 0076b03;遁倫 0390a24〕。「內」字之梵本——遁倫引三藏(玄奘)「梵本經論竝無內字,譯加內字義亦無妨」〔T1828 0389b27〕。

八勝處:解脫=勝解自在,勝處=制伏自在(窺基引《俱舍》)

勝處出體即前三解脫〔窺基 T1829 0077c13「初二勝處初解脫所出,次二勝處第二解脫所出,後四勝處第三解脫所出……此八體即前三解脫也」〕。解脫勝處之別,窺基引《俱舍》〔T1829 0078b05〕:

「《俱舍》云:前修解脫,唯能棄背;後修勝處,能制所緣,隨所樂觀,或終不起。今釋:……由八勝處勝伏所緣,能令初三解脫清淨:是謂解脫、勝處差別。」

勝處「五種勝」(形奪・制伏・隱蔽・厭壞・自在迴轉)為論本自立〔T30n1579 0336c〕,古德此處未別釋此五名(窺基遁倫以《俱舍》「棄背/制所緣」釋勝處義);本層五名歸論本,不誤繫古德。

十遍處:何故唯色觸二處・除火遍處(窺基・遁倫)

遍處=遍勝解〔窺基 T1829 0078b20〕。唯就色觸二處立——「由所依真如遍滿,能依色非色亦復遍滿……唯說能依中實顯色遍滿……唯說所依實觸遍滿」〔窺基 0078b26;遁倫 0392b08〕。除火遍處之故,古德引《涅槃經》三十一「事火外道以火為天,說火體遍,增彼執,故對彼機除火遍處」〔窺基 0078c;遁倫 0392b15〕——唯徵引(古德引涅槃經為釋,唯徵不判)

三位次第:勝處遍處是解脫能清淨道(窺基・遁倫)

總料簡三位次第,古德引六十三・顯揚四〔窺基 T1829 0079a02;遁倫 T1828 0392c03〕:「勝處、遍處是諸解脫能清淨道……由諸勝處勝所緣故,由諸遍處所緣遍故,能令解脫清淨。」(此與攝決擇分 0645c09 同。)

凡鐵金師・和泥喻為論本自立〔T30n1579 0337a〕,古德科判標「以喻顯三法次第」而未別釋此喻——本層喻歸論本(見目六)。


五、術語

古德傳梵(羅馬字·發音輔助)精確義
解脫vimokṣa八解脫;前七於已解脫生勝解、第八棄背想受
八勝處aṣṭa abhibhvāyatana勝知勝見、制伏自在;阿含作「八除入」
十遍處daśa kṛtsnāyatana遍勝解(地水火風青黃赤白空識);阿含作「一切入處/十一切處」
想受滅saṃjñāvedayitanirodha第八解脫;棄背想受;即滅盡定(接三摩缽底子段)
勝解adhimokṣa於所緣作增益之解;解脫位=勝解自在
制伏自在勝處位之自在(勝伏所緣、隨欲觀)

本子段古德傳梵音寫少出;標「—」者表示古德所傳音寫從闕,不據現代校本擬補。八勝處/十遍處之阿含異名(八除入/一切入處)為漢譯異名,非梵音。


六、譬喻·修辭

(一) 凡鐵金師・和泥喻(論本自立·三位次第)——〔T30n1579 0337a〕「譬如世間凡鐵金師,初和泥等,未善調練,解脫位亦爾。如善調練,勝處位亦爾。如調練已,隨欲轉變,遍處位亦爾」:喻體=鑄工和泥→調練→隨欲轉變三階;所顯=解脫(初思勝解)→勝處(制伏自在)→遍處(遍轉自在)之修生次第。古德從闕(窺基遁倫科判標「以喻顯三法次第」而未別釋此喻)。

(二) 君王處分臣僕喻(勝處·自在迴轉)——〔0336c〕「如世君王,隨所欲為處分臣僕」:喻勝處第五「自在迴轉」之勝。


七、互讀

本子段上承阿含(解脫勝處遍處諸經)、平於決擇(攝決擇分解脫決擇)、下接滅盡(第八解脫=想受滅):

  • 《中阿含·大因經》・《長阿含·眾集經》・《雜阿含》:八解脫・八除入・一切入處——本門「攝諸經宗要」所攝之經。
  • 攝決擇分(卷62)〔T30n1579 0645b28〕:修十遍處五事・勝處遍處是解脫能清淨道・想受滅解脫最勝住——本子段之決擇。
  • 三摩缽底子段(06-03-03):第八解脫「棄背想受」=滅盡(想受滅)三摩缽底,識不離身(阿賴耶執持)——本子段下接。
  • 成唯識論:想受滅無為〔T31n1585 0006c15〕・滅盡定〔0037c12〕——第八解脫之論承。

八、校本定位

  • 玄奘 T1579 本地分三摩呬多地·攝諸經宗要·解脫(底本):〔T30n1579 0336b12〕「云何攝諸經宗要」起—〔0337a26〕「遍處位亦爾」訖(八解脫立名 0336b14・有色觀諸色 0336b17・八勝處五種 0336c16・十遍處 0337a05・三位次第喻 0337a14)。
  • 窺基略纂 T1829:宗要科判〔0075c02〕・八解脫立名〔0076a24〕・有色二因緣〔0076b03〕・勝處出體〔0077c13〕・解脫勝處別引俱舍〔0078b05〕・遍處唯色觸〔0078b26〕・三位次第〔0079a02〕。
  • 遁倫論記 T1828:宗要科判〔0378b19・0389b12〕・梵本無內字(玄奘)〔0389b27〕・八解脫立名〔0390a12〕・勝處〔0391b16〕・遍處〔0392a23〕・三位次第〔0392c03〕。
  • 最勝子 T1580:本門全從闕(序釋止 0888a03)。
  • 《中阿含》T0026:八解脫〔0582a17〕・十一切處〔0800b03〕。《長阿含》T0001:八除入〔0055c26〕・八解脫〔0056a14〕。《雜阿含》T0099:一切入處〔0143a18〕。
  • 攝決擇分(卷62):修十遍處五事・勝處遍處清淨道・想受滅最勝住〔0645b28–c11〕。
  • 解深密 T676:解脫勝處遍處善知方便〔0702c20〕。成唯識 T1585:想受滅無為〔0006c15〕・滅盡定〔0037c12〕。
  • 校勘:本子段(0336b12–0337a26)大正原書校記 2 條全枚舉(目二·正文錨全定位·底本從 CBETA 承字·無升定本案),見目二;真諦本佚,無異譯對勘。

The "Gathering the Essential Purport of the Sūtras" gate (uddāna gate five) gathers up the essentials of the sūtras. Of the four kinds set out in the general heading, meditative absorption was expounded earlier; this gate then expounds the remaining three — liberation, concentrative poise, and the equipoise-attainments. This sub-section expounds the first, "liberation" — the eight liberations, the eight dominant bases, the ten totalities, and the sequence of the three positions. Its eight liberations and the rest are at root gathered from the Āgama discourses (the treatise says "as is set forth at length in the sūtras"), and so the sūtras come before the treatise.


I. Doctrinal-Outline Placement

Gathering the Essential Purport of the Sūtras is uddāna gate five of the Stage of Meditative Equipoise. The ancient masters' outline 〔Kuiji, Concise Compendium T43n1829 0075c02〕: Gathering the Purport expounds the latter three among "meditative absorption, liberation, concentrative poise, and the equipoise-attainments" (meditative absorption having been expounded earlier); it divides into three — liberation, concentrative poise, and the equipoise-attainments. The liberation gate divides further into four — expounding liberation, expounding the dominant bases, expounding the totalities, and the general review 〔Kuiji 0075c08; Dunlun T1828 0389b12〕. Dunlun moreover notes that the dominant bases and the totalities "were, by the earlier standing statement, placed under the equipoise-attainment gate; here, following the sequence of practice-and-production, they are expounded next after liberation" 〔T1828 0389b16〕.

Jinaputra's Commentary T1580 is wholly wanting for this gate (its exposition of the prefatory matter stops at 0888a03).


II. Alternate Translations · Collation of In-Treatise Parallels

  • Old translation: Paramārtha's Treatise on the Seventeen Stages does not reach fascicle 12, and is moreover lost — there is no Paramārtha alternate translation for this sub-section; omitted here.
  • In-treatise parallel = the ascertainment of the Stage of Meditative Equipoise in the Section on Ascertainment (fasc. 62): the essentials of the liberation-ascertainment — "cultivating the ten totalities is able to serve five purposes" 〔T30n1579 0645b28「若觀行者修十遍處,能為五事……由修習地遍處等乃至白遍處故,便能引發化事、變事諸聖神通……」 tr. "if one who cultivates contemplative practice cultivates the ten totalities, they are able to serve five purposes … because he cultivates the earth-totality and so on, up to the white-totality, he becomes able to draw forth the noble supernormal powers of the making of things and the transforming of things …"〕, and it ascertains that "the dominant bases and the totalities are the path by which the liberations are made pure. And the liberations, moreover, are what is displayed by the liberation from the cognitive obstruction" 〔0645c09「勝處、遍處是諸解脫能清淨道。又諸解脫,由所知障解脫所顯」〕, and that "the liberation of the cessation of perception and feeling is subsumed under the most excellent dwelling" 〔0645c07「想受滅解脫,最勝住所攝」〕 — precisely the ascertainment of this sub-section's sequence of the three positions (the dominant bases and the totalities purifying the liberations) and of the eighth liberation (the cessation of perception and feeling).
  • Collation (full enumeration of the Taishō base text's collation notes): the span of this sub-section (0336b12–0337a26) carries 2 collation notes in the Taishō base text (although the <app> collation elements number zero, the base text's collation notes are recorded in note form — "zero collation elements" does not equal "no collation notes."). The base text follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); not a single note in this sub-section rises to a critical-edition emendation; variants are recorded alongside for the record. Paramārtha's edition is lost, so there is no alternate translation to collate against:
Note #AnchorBase 【大 Taishō】VariantContext
03370010337a11聞【宋】【元】【明】「聲聲有間,是故不說」 tr. "sound, moreover, has intervals, and for this reason they are not spoken of" — 間 "interval" / 聞 "hearing"
03370020337a23瓦【宋】【元】【明】【宮】「世間凡鐵金師」 tr. "the ironsmith-goldsmith of the world" — 凡 / 瓦

Collation conclusion: all 2 notes follow the CBETA character-readings; neither rises to a critical-edition emendation; Paramārtha's edition is lost, so there is no alternate translation to collate against. The base text has been collated word-for-word.


III. Scriptural Grounds for the Doctrinal Meaning (the Point of the Eye)

Liberation, the dominant bases, and the totalities are at root gathered from the Āgama discourses (the treatise says "as is set forth at length in the sūtras"); their scriptural sources are all present in the canon (the Āgama sources cited in support):

(1) The eight liberations — the Madhyama-āgama · Great Discourse on Causation 〔T01n0026 0582a17, translated by Gautama Saṃghadeva〕:

「有八解脫。云何為八?色觀色,是謂第一解脫……度一切非有想非無想處,想知滅解脫身作證成就遊,及慧觀諸漏盡知,是謂第八解脫。」

tr. "There are eight liberations. What are the eight? Having material form, one contemplates material forms — this is called the first liberation … having transcended the whole of the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, the liberation of the cessation of perception-and-knowing, realized bodily and dwelt in complete, together with the wisdom-contemplation that knows the exhaustion of the taints — this is called the eighth liberation."

The eighth, "the liberation of the cessation of perception-and-knowing," is precisely the scriptural source of the treatise's "turning its back on and casting off perception and feeling." It is also found in the Dīrgha-āgama · Discourse on the Gathered Recital 〔T01n0001 0056a14〕.

(2) The eight dominant bases (called in the Āgamas the "eight bases of overcoming") — the Dīrgha-āgama · Discourse on the Gathered Recital 〔T01n0001 0055c26, translated by Buddhayaśas together with Zhu Fonian〕: 「八除入:內有色想,觀外色少,若好若醜……」 tr. "the eight bases of overcoming: inwardly having perception of form, one contemplates a small amount of outward form, whether fair or foul …" — The ten totalities (called in the Āgamas the "bases of all-pervasion," and in the Madhyama-āgama the "ten universals") — the Saṃyukta-āgama 〔T02n0099 0143a18, translated by Guṇabhadra〕: 「地一切入處……乃至識一切入處」 tr. "the base of the all-pervasion of earth … up to the base of the all-pervasion of consciousness" (the ten: earth, water, fire, wind, blue, yellow, red, white, space, consciousness); the Madhyama-āgama renders the same dharma as "the ten universals" 〔T01n0026 0800b03〕.

The Āgama sūtra-names differ from the treatise's: the eight dominant bases = the eight bases of overcoming (Dīrgha-āgama) · the ten totalities = the bases of all-pervasion (Saṃyukta-āgama) / the ten universals (Madhyama-āgama) — the same dharmas under different names; the treatise (Xuanzang's translation) uses the later-established concentration-terms.

(3) The Saṃdhinirmocana · the Cheng Weishi Lun (lightly) — the Saṃdhinirmocana · Chapter on the Perfection of the Grounds touches on it in a single phrase, 「如實知解脫、勝處、及與遍處,或修或遣」 tr. "he knows as they really are liberation, the dominant bases, and the totalities, and either cultivates them or lets them go" 〔T16n0676 0702c20〕; the Cheng Weishi Lun has no eight liberations, but "the cessation of perception and feeling" is the sixth unconditioned 〔T31n1585 0006c15〕, and the attainment of cessation "one-sidedly wearies of feeling and perception" 〔0037c12〕 — all of these are the treatise-inheritance of the eighth liberation (the cessation of perception and feeling), connecting to the equipoise-attainment sub-section.


IV. The Explanations of the Various Masters (the Ancients · Setting the Theme)

The naming of the eight liberations (Kuiji · Dunlun)

The naming of the first seven and the eighth 〔Kuiji, Concise Compendium T43n1829 0076a24; Dunlun T1828 0390a12〕:

「『前七解脫,於已解脫生勝解』者,七所觀法要離彼地煩惱障染方始修作,名已解脫……『第八解脫棄背想受』者,前遠無間道雖滅想受障,今方得名解脫。」

tr. "As for 'the first seven liberations, with respect to what is already liberated, give rise to resolute conviction': the seven dharmas to be contemplated must first become free of the affliction-obstruction defilement of that ground before one begins to cultivate the practice — this is 'already liberated' … As for 'the eighth liberation turns its back on and casts off perception and feeling': although the earlier far-off uninterrupted path had already extinguished the obstruction of perception-and-feeling, it is only now that the name 'liberation' is attained."

The two causes and conditions of "having material form" (being born in the desire-realm and having attained the concentration of the form-realm · forming a resolute conviction upon luminosity; "it is unlike the Lesser Vehicle's forming of the perception of foulness, for here it speaks of contemplating the perception of luminosity") 〔Kuiji 0076b03; Dunlun 0390a24〕. The Sanskrit for the character "inward" — Dunlun cites the Tripiṭaka-master (Xuanzang): "the Sanskrit sūtra and treatise both have no character 'inward'; adding the character 'inward' in translation does no harm to the sense either" 〔T1828 0389b27〕.

The eight dominant bases: liberation = mastery of resolute conviction, the dominant bases = mastery of subjugation (Kuiji citing the Abhidharmakośa)

The substance drawn out by the dominant bases is just the first three liberations 〔Kuiji T1829 0077c13「初二勝處初解脫所出,次二勝處第二解脫所出,後四勝處第三解脫所出……此八體即前三解脫也」 tr. "the first two dominant bases are drawn out from the first liberation, the next two dominant bases from the second liberation, and the last four dominant bases from the third liberation … the substance of these eight is just the first three liberations"〕. For the difference between liberation and the dominant bases, Kuiji cites the Abhidharmakośa 〔T1829 0078b05〕:

「《俱舍》云:前修解脫,唯能棄背;後修勝處,能制所緣,隨所樂觀,或終不起。今釋:……由八勝處勝伏所緣,能令初三解脫清淨:是謂解脫、勝處差別。」

tr. "The Abhidharmakośa says: in cultivating liberation earlier, one could only turn one's back; in cultivating the dominant bases after, one is able to master the object — contemplating however one pleases, or in the end not giving rise to it at all. The present gloss: … because the eight dominant bases subjugate the object, they are able to make the first three liberations pure — this is the difference between liberation and the dominant bases."

The dominant bases' "five kinds of excellence" (outclassing · subjugating · concealing · wearying-and-wearing-down · turning-and-wheeling with mastery) are set up by the treatise itself 〔T30n1579 0336c〕; the ancient masters give no separate gloss of these five names here (Kuiji and Dunlun gloss the sense of the dominant bases by the Abhidharmakośa's "turning the back / mastering the object"); this register assigns the five names to the treatise itself, and does not misattribute them to the ancient masters.

The ten totalities: why only the two bases of form and the tangible · the fire-totality is left out (Kuiji · Dunlun)

The totalities = pervading resolute conviction 〔Kuiji T1829 0078b20〕. They are established with respect only to the two bases of form and the tangible — "because the suchness on which they rest is pervasive, that which rests upon it, form and non-form, is likewise pervasive … it speaks only of the actual visible-color within that which rests upon it as being pervasive … it speaks only of the actual tangible on which it rests as being pervasive" 〔Kuiji 0078b26; Dunlun 0392b08〕. As to why the fire-totality is left out, the ancient masters cite the Nirvāṇa-sūtra fasc. 31, "the fire-serving heterodox ones take fire to be a god, and say that the substance of fire pervades; this would foster their clinging, and so, for such dispositions, the fire-totality is left out" 〔Kuiji 0078c; Dunlun 0392b15〕 — citation only (the ancient masters cite the Nirvāṇa-sūtra as gloss; cited, not adjudicated).

The sequence of the three positions: the dominant bases and the totalities are the path by which the liberations are made pure (Kuiji · Dunlun)

In the general review of the sequence of the three positions, the ancient masters cite fascicle sixty-three and the Xianyang fasc. 4 〔Kuiji T1829 0079a02; Dunlun T1828 0392c03〕: 「勝處、遍處是諸解脫能清淨道……由諸勝處勝所緣故,由諸遍處所緣遍故,能令解脫清淨。」 tr. "the dominant bases and the totalities are the path by which the liberations are made pure … because the various dominant bases master the object, and because the object of the various totalities pervades, they are able to make the liberations pure." (This agrees with the Section on Ascertainment, 0645c09.)

The ironsmith-goldsmith · blending-the-clay simile is set up by the treatise itself 〔T30n1579 0337a〕; the ancient masters' outline marks it as "displaying by a simile the sequence of the three dharmas" but gives no separate gloss of the simile — this register assigns the simile to the treatise itself (see Heading VI).


V. Terminology

Ancient-transmitted Sanskrit (romanization · pronunciation aid)Precise sense
解脫vimokṣaThe eight liberations; the first seven give rise to resolute conviction upon what is already liberated, the eighth turns its back on and casts off perception and feeling
八勝處aṣṭa abhibhvāyatanaExcellent knowing and excellent seeing, mastery of subjugation; called in the Āgamas the "eight bases of overcoming"
十遍處daśa kṛtsnāyatanaPervading resolute conviction (earth, water, fire, wind, blue, yellow, red, white, space, consciousness); called in the Āgamas the "bases of all-pervasion / the ten universals"
想受滅saṃjñāvedayitanirodhaThe eighth liberation; turning its back on and casting off perception and feeling; that is, the attainment of cessation (connecting to the equipoise-attainment sub-section)
勝解adhimokṣaThe resolute conviction that adds a positive determination upon the object; the liberation-position = mastery of resolute conviction
制伏自在The mastery of the dominant-bases-position (subjugating the object, contemplating at will)

For this sub-section the ancient-transmitted Sanskrit transliterations are largely absent; entries marked "—" lack an attestable ancient-master transliteration and are not reconstructed from modern critical editions. The Āgama alternate names of the eight dominant bases / ten totalities (the eight bases of overcoming / the bases of all-pervasion) are Chinese-translation alternate names, not Sanskrit sounds.


VI. Similes · Rhetoric

(1) The ironsmith-goldsmith · blending-the-clay simile (set up by the treatise itself · the sequence of the three positions) — 〔T30n1579 0337a〕「譬如世間凡鐵金師,初和泥等,未善調練,解脫位亦爾。如善調練,勝處位亦爾。如調練已,隨欲轉變,遍處位亦爾」 tr. "it is like the ironsmith-goldsmith of the world: at first he blends the clay and so forth, not yet well tempered — the position of liberation is likewise; when it is well tempered — the position of the dominant bases is likewise; when the tempering is done, and he transforms it according to his wish — the position of the totalities is likewise": the simile's vehicle = the smith's three stages of blending the clay → tempering → transforming at will; what it displays = the practice-and-production sequence of liberation (first reflecting with resolute conviction) → the dominant bases (mastery of subjugation) → the totalities (mastery of pervading transformation). The ancient masters give no separate gloss (Kuiji and Dunlun's outline marks it as "displaying by a simile the sequence of the three dharmas" but gives no separate gloss of the simile).

(2) The king-disposing-of-his-ministers-and-servants simile (the dominant bases · turning-and-wheeling with mastery) — 〔0336c〕「如世君王,隨所欲為處分臣僕」 tr. "as a king of the world disposes of his ministers and servants according to whatever he wishes": a simile for the fifth excellence of the dominant bases, "turning-and-wheeling with mastery."


VII. Cross-Reading

This sub-section takes up from above the Āgamas (the sūtras of liberation, the dominant bases, and the totalities), stands level with the ascertainment (the liberation-ascertainment of the Section on Ascertainment), and connects downward to cessation (the eighth liberation = the cessation of perception and feeling):

  • the Madhyama-āgama · Great Discourse on Causation · the Dīrgha-āgama · Discourse on the Gathered Recital · the Saṃyukta-āgama: the eight liberations · the eight bases of overcoming · the bases of all-pervasion — the sūtras gathered by this gate, "Gathering the Essential Purport of the Sūtras."
  • the Section on Ascertainment (fasc. 62) 〔T30n1579 0645b28〕: cultivating the ten totalities to serve five purposes · the dominant bases and the totalities as the path by which the liberations are made pure · the liberation of the cessation of perception and feeling as subsumed under the most excellent dwelling — the ascertainment of this sub-section.
  • the equipoise-attainment sub-section (06-03-03): the eighth liberation, "turning its back on and casting off perception and feeling," = the equipoise-attainment of cessation (the cessation of perception and feeling), where consciousness does not depart from the body (the appropriating-and-holding of the store consciousness) — the downward connection of this sub-section.
  • the Cheng Weishi Lun: the unconditioned of the cessation of perception and feeling 〔T31n1585 0006c15〕 · the attainment of cessation 〔0037c12〕 — the treatise-inheritance of the eighth liberation.

VIII. Placement of the Critical Editions

  • Xuanzang T1579 Basic Section · the Stage of Meditative Equipoise · Gathering the Essential Purport of the Sūtras · Liberation (base text): from 〔T30n1579 0336b12〕「云何攝諸經宗要」 tr. "What is Gathering the Essential Purport of the Sūtras" to 〔0337a26〕「遍處位亦爾」 tr. "the position of the totalities is likewise" (the naming of the eight liberations 0336b14 · having material form, contemplating material forms 0336b17 · the five kinds of the dominant bases 0336c16 · the ten totalities 0337a05 · the simile of the three positions 0337a14).
  • Kuiji, Concise Compendium T1829: the Purport outline 〔0075c02〕 · the naming of the eight liberations 〔0076a24〕 · the two causes and conditions of having material form 〔0076b03〕 · the substance drawn out by the dominant bases 〔0077c13〕 · the difference of liberation and the dominant bases, citing the Abhidharmakośa 〔0078b05〕 · the totalities established only upon form and the tangible 〔0078b26〕 · the sequence of the three positions 〔0079a02〕.
  • Dunlun, Notes T1828: the Purport outline 〔0378b19 · 0389b12〕 · the Sanskrit's want of the character "inward" (Xuanzang) 〔0389b27〕 · the naming of the eight liberations 〔0390a12〕 · the dominant bases 〔0391b16〕 · the totalities 〔0392a23〕 · the sequence of the three positions 〔0392c03〕.
  • Jinaputra T1580: wholly wanting for this gate (its exposition of the prefatory matter stops at 0888a03).
  • the Madhyama-āgama T0026: the eight liberations 〔0582a17〕 · the ten universals 〔0800b03〕. the Dīrgha-āgama T0001: the eight bases of overcoming 〔0055c26〕 · the eight liberations 〔0056a14〕. the Saṃyukta-āgama T0099: the bases of all-pervasion 〔0143a18〕.
  • the Section on Ascertainment (fasc. 62): cultivating the ten totalities to serve five purposes · the dominant bases and the totalities as the path of purification · the cessation of perception and feeling as the most excellent dwelling 〔0645b28–c11〕.
  • the Saṃdhinirmocana T676: liberation, the dominant bases, and the totalities, [known through] a skillful means 〔0702c20〕. the Cheng Weishi Lun T1585: the unconditioned of the cessation of perception and feeling 〔0006c15〕 · the attainment of cessation 〔0037c12〕.
  • Collation: the span of this sub-section (0336b12–0337a26) carries 2 collation notes in the Taishō base text, fully enumerated (Heading II· the base follows the CBETA character-readings · none rises to a critical-edition emendation), see Heading II; Paramārtha's edition is lost, so there is no alternate translation to collate against.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing — with AI-assisted consistency checking

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0