瑜伽師地論 聲聞地 · 第二瑜伽處 · 所緣 · 遍滿+淨行

心要Essence

前段認清「人」(五行性),這段配「藥」(五停心)。眼:通用所緣的四影像=止觀地圖;緣起正觀的四道理;數息末後的十六勝行=四念住(接下文菩提分)。

一句話:所緣開四章(遍滿·淨行·善巧·淨惑),本子說前二——遍滿所緣(四影像:有分別=觀/無分別=止九住心/事邊際=盡所有·如所有/所作成辦=轉依超影像現量;附《頡隸伐多經》「於相稱緣安住其心」)+淨行五停心(不淨治貪〔六不淨·憺怕路屍變·治五貪四婬貪〕·慈愍治瞋·緣性緣起治癡〔四道理〕·界差別治慢〔離一合相〕·阿那波那念治尋思〔五修習:算數/悟入諸蘊/緣起/聖諦/十六勝行〕)。藥對病——承前補特伽羅五行相之機。

三個眼目

  1. 五停心=五行對治(藥對病·頡隸伐多經明文):遍滿所緣《頡隸伐多經》標「於相稱緣安住其心」——貪行→不淨·瞋行→慈愍·癡行→緣性緣起·慢行→界差別·尋思行→阿那波那念〔T30 0428a〕。古德逐門標治(遁倫 T42 0446b–0447b)。不淨六種(朽穢〔依內三十六物·依外青瘀至散壞·四憺怕路屍變〕/苦惱/下劣/觀待/煩惱/速壞)治五貪(內身/外身婬〔顯色·形色·妙觸·承事四婬貪〕/境/色/薩迦耶)。界差別六界(地水火風空識·內外)令「離一合相」治慢〔窺基引《般若》T43 0114a〕。

  2. 緣性緣起·四道理(緣起正觀·義理眼·遁倫逐字)〔T30 0430a·遁倫 T42 0447a07–a17〕:依四道理推求三世諸行「唯有諸法能引諸法,無有作者及受者」——觀待(觀待無明故有行)·作用(唯生行作用·無假用)·證成(至教量〔緣起苦集〕+現量+比量三量)·法爾(有佛無佛無明緣行其性法爾·不由作受者)。遁倫判「緣性=四緣·緣起=十二支緣」。窺基於此唯一句不展四道理(唯錄此別)。後於思所成地廣明。

  3. 阿那波那念·十六勝行=四念住(接菩提分·義理眼)〔T30 0431a–0432a·遁倫 T42 0449b·窺基 T43 0114b〕:五種修習=算數(一為一/二為一/順/逆/勝進·過算數地任運)·悟入諸蘊·悟入緣起(順逆推息←身心←命根←先行←無明)·悟入聖諦·十六勝行。十六勝行四念住四四配:觀息長/短/遍身/息除身行=觀身·覺了喜/樂/心行/息除心行=觀受·覺了心/喜悅心/制持心/解脫心=觀心·無常/斷/離欲/滅隨觀=觀法(緣斷界/離欲界/滅界)。「勝前見道故名勝行」(遁倫 T42 0449a)→ 正啟下文三十七菩提分(四念住為首)。

附註:所緣承補特伽羅五行相(13-02-01)為對治之機(先立人·後對治);四道理→思所成地(地11);九住心/止觀/轉依→三摩呬多地(地06);十六勝行四念住→瑜伽修菩提分(13-02-04)。古德雙詳:遁倫《論記》卷六之下→卷七之上〔T42 0444b14–0449c19·四道理·五停心治病·十六勝行四念住·景/泰/基/備/遠公/三藏〕;窺基《略纂》卷八〔T43 0113b04–0114c25·四影像·五貪·憺怕路·六界·十六勝行;慈愍/四道理闕釋〕。義理開講見〈義疏〉。

The prior unit made the "person" clear (the five modes of temperament); this unit compounds the "medicine" (the five settling-of-mind contemplations). The eye: the four images of the universal object = a map of tranquillity-and-insight; the four principles of the right contemplation of dependent origination; the sixteen excellent practices = the four foundations of mindfulness at the end of the counting of breaths (joining onto the factors of awakening in the following text).

In one line: The object opens into four sections (pervasive · conduct-purifying · skill · affliction-cleansing); this unit expounds the first two — the pervasive object (four images: endowed with discernment = insight / devoid of discernment = tranquillity, the nine abidings of the mind / the limit of the object = exhaustive-nature and such-as-it-is-nature / the consummation of what is to be done = the transformation of the basis, surpassing the image into direct perception; with the Revata Sūtra's "rest the mind upon a concordant object" appended) + the conduct-purifying five settling-of-mind contemplations (the impure treats greed 〔six impures · the corpse-changes of the charnel-road · treating the five greeds and the four licentious greeds〕 · loving-kindness treats hatred · the object-nature and dependent origination treat delusion 〔the four principles〕 · the differentiation of elements treats conceit 〔parting from the mark of the single unified〕 · mindfulness of breathing treats discursive thought 〔five cultivations: counting / penetrating the aggregates / dependent origination / the noble truths / the sixteen excellent practices〕). Medicine matched to sickness — receiving from before the faculty of the persons' five modes of temperament.

Three Points of the Eye

  1. The five settling-of-mind contemplations = the antidote for the five modes (medicine matched to sickness · the plain text of the Revata Sūtra): The pervasive object cites the Revata Sūtra's signal "rest the mind upon a concordant object" — greedy temperament → the impure · hateful temperament → loving-kindness · deluded temperament → the object-nature and dependent origination · conceited temperament → the differentiation of elements · discursive temperament → mindfulness of breathing 〔T30 0428a〕. The ancient masters mark the treatment gate by gate (Dunlun T42 0446b–0447b). The six kinds of the impure (rotting-and-foul 〔inwardly the thirty-six things · outwardly from livid-blue to scattered-and-destroyed · the four charnel-roads of corpse-changes〕 / suffering-and-distressing / low-and-mean / relative / affliction-bound / swiftly-perishing) treat the five greeds (inner body / licentious greed for the outer body 〔the four licentious greeds: color · shape · fine touch · being-waited-upon〕 / object / form / identity-view). The differentiation of elements — the six elements (earth, water, fire, wind, space, consciousness · inner and outer) — causes one to "part from the mark of the single unified," treating conceit 〔Kuiji cites the Prajñāpāramitā T43 0114a〕.

  2. The object-nature and dependent origination · the four principles (the right contemplation of dependent origination · doctrinal point of the eye · Dunlun line by line) 〔T30 0430a · Dunlun T42 0447a07–a17〕: Investigating the formations of the three times by the four principles — "there are only dharmas that draw forth dharmas; there is no agent and no experiencer" — dependence-and-attendance (the formations exist in dependence upon and attendance on ignorance (avidyā)) · activity (only the activity of giving rise to the formations · no superfluous activity) · establishing-proof (the three means of knowledge: authoritative teaching 〔dependent origination, suffering and its origin〕 + direct perception + inference) · the very-way-things-are (whether a buddha appears or not, ignorance conditions the formations, its nature the very way things are · not by an agent or an experiencer). Dunlun adjudicates: "the object-nature = the four conditions · dependent origination = the twelve-limbed causation." Kuiji here alone gives one line and does not unfold the four principles (this divergence alone recorded). Amply set forth later in the Stage of What is Attained through Reflection.

  3. Mindfulness of breathing · the sixteen excellent practices = the four foundations of mindfulness (joining onto the factors of awakening · doctrinal point of the eye) 〔T30 0431a–0432a · Dunlun T42 0449b · Kuiji T43 0114b〕: The five cultivations = counting (one as one / two as one / forward / reverse / advancing-onward · abiding spontaneously past the ground of counting) · penetrating the aggregates · penetrating dependent origination (tracing forward and back: breath ← body-and-mind ← the life-faculty ← prior formations ← ignorance) · penetrating the noble truths · the sixteen excellent practices. The sixteen excellent practices matched four-by-four to the four foundations of mindfulness: contemplating the breath long / short / whole body / stilling the bodily formation = contemplation of the body · being aware of joy / bliss / the mental formation / stilling the mental formation = contemplation of feeling · being aware of the mind / gladdening the mind / restraining-and-holding the mind / liberating the mind = contemplation of the mind · the contemplations attendant on impermanence / severance / the fading of desire / cessation = contemplation of dharmas (taking as object the element of severance / of the fading of desire / of cessation). "Excelling the work before the path of seeing, they are called excellent practices" (Dunlun T42 0449a) → this opens onto the thirty-seven factors of awakening in the following text (the four foundations of mindfulness being their head).

Appended note: The object receives from the persons' five modes of temperament (13-02-01) as the faculty for treatment (first set up the person, then treat it); the four principles → the Stage of What is Attained through Reflection (Stage 11); the nine abidings of the mind / tranquillity-and-insight / the transformation of the basis → the Stage of Meditative Equipoise (Stage 6); the sixteen excellent practices as the four foundations of mindfulness → the Cultivation of Yoga's factors of awakening (13-02-04). The ancient masters detail it on two sides: Dunlun's Notes on the Yogācārabhūmi, fascicle six-lower into fascicle seven-upper 〔T42 0444b14–0449c19 · the four principles · the five settling-of-mind contemplations' treatment of the sicknesses · the sixteen excellent practices as the four foundations of mindfulness · Jing / Tai / Kuiji / Bei / the Elder Yuan / the Tripiṭaka-master〕; Kuiji's Concise Compendium, fascicle eight 〔T43 0113b04–0114c25 · the four images · the five greeds · the charnel-road · the six elements · the sixteen excellent practices; loving-kindness and the four principles left unglossed〕. The full doctrinal exposition is found in the ⟨Exposition⟩.

原典Canonical · verbatim

云何所緣?謂有四種所緣境事。何等為四?一者、遍滿所緣境事,二者、淨行所緣境事,三者、善巧所緣境事,四者、淨惑所緣境事。 云何遍滿所緣境事?謂復四種。一、有分別影像,二、無分別影像,三、事邊際性,四、所作成辦。 云何有分別影像?謂如有一,或聽聞正法、或教授教誡為所依止,或見、或聞、或分別故,於所知事同分影像、由三摩呬多地毘鉢舍那行觀察簡擇、極簡擇、遍尋思、遍伺察。 所知事者,謂或不淨、或慈愍,或緣性緣起,或界差別,或阿那波那念,或蘊善巧,或界善巧,或處善巧,或緣起善巧,或處非處善巧,或下地麁性、上地靜性,或苦諦、集諦、滅諦、道諦。是名所知事。 此所知事,或依教授教誡、或聽聞正法為所依止,令三摩呬多地作意現前,即於彼法而起勝解,即於彼所知事而起勝解。彼於爾時,於所知事,如現領受勝解而轉。 雖彼所知事,非現領受和合現前,亦非所餘彼種類物。然由三摩呬多地勝解,領受相似作意、領受彼所知事相似顯現。由此道理,名所知事同分影像。修觀行者,推求此故,於彼本性所知事中,觀察審定功德過失。是名有分別影像。 云何無分別影像?謂修觀行者,受取如是影像相已,不復觀察簡擇、極簡擇、遍尋思、遍伺察。然即於此所緣影像,以奢摩他行寂靜其心,即是九種行相令心安住。謂令心內住、等住、安住、近住、調伏、寂靜、最極寂靜、一趣、等持。彼於爾時,成無分別影像所緣。即於如是所緣影像,一向一趣安住其念,不復觀察簡擇、極簡擇、遍尋思、遍伺察。是名無分別影像。 即此影像,亦名影像。亦名三摩地相,亦名三摩地所行境界,亦名三摩地口,亦名三摩地門,亦名作意處,亦名內分別體,亦名光影。如是等類,當知名為所知事同分影像諸名差別。 云何事邊際性?謂若所緣盡所有性、如所有性。 云何名為盡所有性?謂色蘊外更無餘色,受想行識蘊外更無有餘受想行識;一切有為事,皆五法所攝;一切諸法,界處所攝;一切所知事,四聖諦攝。如是名為盡所有性。 云何名為如所有性?謂若所緣是真實性、是真如性,由四道理,具道理性。謂觀待道理、作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理。 如是若所緣境盡所有性、如所有性,總說為一事邊際性。 云何所作成辦?謂修觀行者,於奢摩他、毘鉢舍那,若修、若習、若多修習為因緣故,諸緣影像所有作意皆得圓滿。此圓滿故,便得轉依,一切麁重悉皆息滅。得轉依故,超過影像,即於所知事,有無分別現量智見生。入初靜慮者,得初靜慮時,於初靜慮所行境界;入第二第三第四靜慮者,得第二第三第四靜慮時,於第二第三第四靜慮所行境界;入空無邊處、識無邊處、無所有處、非想非非想處者,得彼定時,即於彼定所行境界。如是名為所作成辦。 如是四種所緣境事,遍行一切,隨入一切所緣境中,去來今世正等覺者共所宣說。是故說名遍滿所緣。又此所緣,遍毘鉢舍那品、遍奢摩他品、遍一切事、遍真實事、遍因果相屬事,故名遍滿。 謂若說有分別影像,即是此中毘鉢舍那品。若說無分別影像,即是此中奢摩他品。若說事邊際性,即是此中一切事、真實事。若說所作成辦,即是此中因果相屬事。 如佛世尊曾為長老頡隸伐多說如是義。曾聞長老頡隸伐多問世尊言:大德!諸有比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,能於所緣安住其心。為何於緣安住其心?云何於緣安住其心?齊何名為心善安住? 佛告長老頡隸伐多:善哉!善哉!汝今善能問如是義。汝今諦聽,極善思惟,吾當為汝宣說開示。 頡隸伐多!諸有比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,能於所緣安住其心。或樂淨行、或樂善巧、或樂令心解脫諸漏,於相稱緣安住其心,於相似緣安住其心,於緣無倒安住其心,能於其中不捨靜慮。 云何比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,於相稱緣安住其心? 謂彼比丘若唯有貪行,應於不淨緣安住於心,如是名為於相稱緣安住其心。若唯有瞋行,應於慈愍安住其心;若唯有癡行,應於緣性緣起安住其心;若唯有慢行,應於界差別安住其心;若唯有尋思行,應於阿那波那念安住其心。如是名為於相稱緣安住其心。 頡隸伐多!又彼比丘若愚諸行自相,愚我、有情、命者、生者、能養育者、補特伽羅事,應於蘊善巧安住其心。若愚其因,應於界善巧安住其心。若愚其緣,應於處善巧安住其心。若愚無常、苦、空、無我,應於緣起、處非處善巧安住其心。若樂離欲界欲,應於諸欲麁性、諸色靜性安住其心;若樂離色界欲,應於諸色麁性、無色靜性安住其心。若樂通達及樂解脫遍一切處薩迦耶事,應於苦諦、集諦、滅諦、道諦安住其心。是名比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,於相稱緣安住其心。 頡隸伐多!云何比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,於相似緣安住其心?謂彼比丘,於彼彼所知事,為欲簡擇、極簡擇、遍尋思、遍伺察故,於先所見、所聞、所覺、所知事,由見聞覺知增上力故,以三摩呬多地作意,思惟分別而起勝解。彼雖於其本所知事不能和合現前觀察,然與本事相似而生,於彼所緣有彼相似唯智、唯見、唯正憶念。又彼比丘,於時時間令心寂靜,於時時間依增上慧法毘鉢舍那勤修觀行。是名比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,於相似緣安住其心。 頡隸伐多!云何比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,於緣無倒安住其心? 謂若比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,於所緣境安住其心,隨應解了所知境界,如實無倒能遍了知。是名比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,於緣無倒安住其心。 頡隸伐多!云何比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,能於其中不捨靜慮?謂若比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,如是於緣正修行時,無間加行、殷重加行,於時時間修習止相、舉相、捨相。由修、由習、由多修習為因緣故,一切麁重悉皆息滅,隨得觸證所依清淨。於所知事,由現見故,隨得觸證所緣清淨。由離貪故,隨得觸證心遍清淨。離無明故,隨得觸證智遍清淨。是名比丘勤修觀行,是瑜伽師,能於其中不捨靜慮。 頡隸伐多!為此比丘於所緣境安住其心,如是於緣安住其心,如是於緣安住心已,名善安住。 世尊此中重說頌曰:   行者行諸相,知一切實義,
  常於影靜慮,得證遍清淨。
此中說言「行者行諸相」者,由此宣說修觀行者,於止、舉、捨相,無間修行、殷重修行。若復說言:知一切實義者。由此宣說事邊際性。若復說言:常於影靜慮者。由此宣說有分別影像、無分別影像。若復說言:得證遍清淨者。由此宣說所作成辦。 此中世尊復說頌曰:   於心相遍知,能受遠離味。
  靜慮常委念,受喜樂離染。
此中說言「於心相遍知」者,謂有分別影像、無分別影像,以心相名說;事邊際性,以遍知名說。若復說言:能受遠離味者。由此宣說於其所緣正修行者樂斷樂修。若復說言:靜慮常委念者。由此宣說於奢摩他、毘鉢舍那,常勤修習、委練修習。若復說言:受喜樂離染者。由此宣說所作成辦。當知如是遍滿所緣,隨順淨教,契合正理。如是名為遍滿所緣。 云何名為淨行所緣? 謂不淨、慈愍、緣性緣起、界差別、阿那波那念等所緣差別。 云何不淨所緣?謂略說有六種不淨。 一、朽穢不淨,二、苦惱不淨,三、下劣不淨,四、觀待不淨,五、煩惱不淨,六、速壞不淨。 云何名為朽穢不淨?謂此不淨,略依二種。一者、依內,二者、依外。 云何依內朽穢不淨?謂內身中,髮、毛、爪、齒、塵、垢、皮、肉、骸、骨、筋、脈、心、膽、肝、肺、大腸、小腸、生藏、熟藏、肚、胃、脾、腎、膿、血、熱痰、肪、膏、肌、髓、腦、膜、洟、唾、淚、汗、屎、尿。如是等類,名為依內朽穢不淨。 云何依外朽穢不淨?謂或青瘀、或復膿爛、或復變壞、或復膖脹、或復食噉、或復變赤、或復散壞、或骨、或鎖、或復骨鎖、或屎所作、或尿所作、或唾所作、或洟所作、或血所塗、或膿所塗、或便穢處。如是等類,名為依外朽穢不淨。 如是依內朽穢不淨及依外朽穢不淨,總說為一朽穢不淨。 云何名為苦惱不淨?謂順苦受觸為緣所生,若身、若心不平等受,受所攝。如是名為苦惱不淨。 云何名為下劣不淨?謂最下劣事、最下劣界,所謂欲界。除此更無極下、極劣、最極鄙穢餘界可得。如是名為下劣不淨。 云何名為觀待不淨?謂如有一劣清淨事,觀待其餘勝清淨事,便似不淨。如待無色勝清淨事,色界諸法便似不淨;待薩迦耶寂滅涅槃,乃至有頂皆似不淨。如是等類,一切名為觀待不淨。 云何名為煩惱不淨?謂三界中,所有一切結、縛、隨眠、隨煩惱、纏,一切名為煩惱不淨。 云何名為速壞不淨?謂五取蘊,無常、無恒、不可保信、變壞法性。如是名為速壞不淨。如是不淨,是能清淨貪行所緣? 貪有五種。一、於內身欲欲欲貪,二、於外身婬欲婬貪,三、境欲境貪,四、色欲色貪,五、薩迦耶欲薩迦耶貪。是名五貪。 為欲令此五種欲貪斷滅、除遣、不現行故,建立六種不淨所緣。 謂由依內朽穢不淨所緣故,令於內身欲欲欲貪,心得清淨。 由依外朽穢不淨所緣故,令於外身婬欲婬貪,心得清淨。 婬相應貪復有四種。一、顯色貪,二、形色貪,三、妙觸貪,四、承事貪。由依四外不淨所緣,於此四種相應婬貪,心得清淨。 若於青瘀、或於膿爛、或於變壞、或於膖脹、或於食噉作意思惟,於顯色貪令心清淨。若於變赤作意思惟,於形色貪令心清淨。若於其骨、若於其鎖、若於骨鎖作意思惟,於妙觸貪令心清淨。若於散壞作意思惟,於承事貪令心清淨。如是四種,名於婬貪令心清淨。 是故世尊乃至所有依外朽穢不淨差別,皆依四種憺怕路而正建立。 謂若說言:由憺怕路見彼彼屍,死經一日,或經二日,或經七日,烏鵲、餓狗、鵄鷲、狐狼、野干、禽獸之所食噉,便取其相,以譬彼身亦如是性,亦如是類,不能超過如是法性。此即顯示始從青瘀乃至食噉。 若復說言:由憺怕路見彼彼屍,離皮肉血,筋脈纏裹。此即顯示所有變赤。 若復說言:由憺怕路見彼彼骨,或骨、或鎖。此即顯示或骨、或鎖、或復骨鎖。 若復說言:由憺怕路見彼彼骨,手骨異處,足骨異處,臗骨異處,膝骨異處,臂骨異處,肘骨異處,脊骨異處,髆骨異處,肋骨異處,頷輪、齒鬘、頂髑髏等各各分散,或經一年、或二,或三,乃至七年,其色鮮白,猶如螺貝,或如鴿色。或見彼骨和雜塵土。此即顯示所有散壞。 如是依外所有朽穢不淨所緣,令於四種婬相應貪,心得清淨。由苦惱不淨所緣,及下劣不淨所緣故,令於境相應若欲若貪,心得清淨。由觀待不淨所緣故,令於色相應若欲若貪,心得清淨。由煩惱不淨所緣,及速壞不淨所緣故,令於從欲界乃至有頂諸薩迦耶若欲若貪,心得清淨。是名貪行淨行所緣。如是且約能淨貪行,總說一切通治所攝不淨所緣。 今此義中,本意唯取朽穢不淨,所餘不淨亦是其餘淨行所緣。 云何慈愍所緣? 謂或於親品、或於怨品、或於中品,平等安住利益意樂,能引下中上品快樂定地勝解。當知此中,親品、怨品,及以中品是為所緣;利益意樂、能引快樂定地勝解,是為能緣。所緣、能緣總略為一,說名慈愍所緣。 若經說言:慈俱心者。此即顯示於親怨中三品所緣利益意樂。若復說言:無怨、無敵、無損害者。此則顯示利益意樂有三種相。由無怨故,名為增上利益意樂。此無怨性二句所顯,謂無敵對故、無損惱故。不欲相違諍義,是無敵對。不欲不饒益義,是無損害。 若復說言:廣大無量。此則顯示能引下中上品快樂。欲界快樂名廣,初二靜慮地快樂名大,第三靜慮地快樂名無量。若復說言:勝解遍滿具足住者。此則顯示能引快樂定地勝解。又此勝解,即是能引快樂利益增上意樂所攝勝解作意俱行。若於無苦無樂親怨中三品有情,平等欲與其樂,當知是慈。若於有苦、或於有樂親怨中三品有情,平等欲拔其苦,欲慶其樂,當知是悲、是喜。有苦有情是悲所緣,有樂有情是喜所緣,是名慈愍所緣。 若有瞋行補特伽羅,於諸有情修習慈愍,令瞋微薄,名於瞋恚心得清淨。 本地分中聲聞地第十三第二瑜伽處之二 云何緣性緣起所緣? 謂於三世唯行、唯法、唯事、唯因、唯果,墮正道理。 謂觀待道理、作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理。唯有諸法能引諸法,無有作者及以受者,是名緣性緣起所緣。 於此所緣作意思惟,癡行增上補特伽羅所有癡行皆得微薄,於諸癡行,心得清淨。 是名緣性緣起所緣。 云何界差別所緣?謂六界差別。一、地界,二、水界,三、火界,四、風界,五、空界,六、識界。 云何地界?地界有二。一、內,二、外。內地界者,謂此身中內別堅性,堅鞕所攝、地地所攝,親附、執受。外地界者,謂外堅性,堅鞕所攝、地地所攝,非親附、非執受。又內地界其事云何?謂髮、毛、爪、齒、塵垢、皮、肉、骸骨、筋、脈、肝、膽、心、肺、脾、腎、肚、胃、大腸、小腸、生藏、熟藏,及糞穢等,名內地界。又外地界其事云何?謂瓦、木、塊、礫、樹、石、山、巖,如是等類,名外地界。 云何水界?水界有二。一、內,二、外。內水界者,謂此身中內別濕性,濕潤所攝、水水所攝,親附、執受。其事云何?謂淚、汗、洟、唾、肪、膏、脂、髓、熱痰、膿血、腦、膜、尿等,名內水界。外水界者,謂外濕性,濕潤所攝、水水所攝,非親附,非執受。其事云何?謂井、泉、池、沼、陂、湖、河、海,如是等類,名外水界。 云何火界?火界有二。一、內,二、外。內火界者,謂此身中內別溫性,溫熱所攝、煖煖所攝,親附、執受。其事云何?謂於身中所有溫煖,能令身熱、等熱、遍熱。由是因緣,所食、所飲、所噉、所甞,易正消變。彼增盛故,墮蒸熱數。如是等類,名內火界。外火界者,謂外溫性,溫熱所攝、煖煖所攝,非親附、非執受。其事云何?謂於人間依鑽燧等、牛糞末等,以求其火。火既生已,能燒牛糞、或草、或薪、或榛、或野、或山、或渚、或村、村分、或城、城分、或國、國分。或復所餘如是等類,名外火界。 云何風界?風界有二。一、內,二、外。內風界者,謂此身中內別風性,風飄所攝,輕性、動性,親附、執受。其事云何?謂內身中,有上行風、有下行風、有脇臥風、有脊臥風、有腰間風、有臗間風、有小刀風、有大刀風、有針刺風、有畢鉢羅風、有入出息風、有隨支節風。如是等類,名內風界。外風界者,謂外風性,風飄所攝,輕性、動性,非親附、非執受。其事云何?謂在身外,有東來風、有西來風、有南來風、有北來風、有有塵風、有無塵風、有狹小風、有廣大風、有毘濕婆風、有吠藍婆風、有風輪風。有時大風卒起積集,折樹、頹牆、崩山、蕩海;既飄鼓已,無所依憑,自然靜息。若諸有情欲求風者,動衣、搖扇、及多羅掌。如是等類,名外風界。 云何空界?謂眼、耳、鼻、口、咽喉等所有孔穴。由此吞咽、於此吞咽,既吞咽已,由此孔穴便下漏泄。如是等類,說名空界。 云何識界?謂眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意識。又心、意、識三種差別。是名識界。 若諸慢行補特伽羅,於界差別作意思惟,便於身中離一合想,得不淨想。無復高舉,憍慢微薄,於諸慢行,心得清淨。是名慢行補特伽羅由界差別淨行所緣。 云何阿那波那念所緣? 謂緣入息、出息念,是名阿那波那念。 此念所緣入出息等,名阿那波那念所緣。 當知此中,入息有二。何等為二?一者、入息,二者、中間入息。出息亦二。何等為二?一者、出息,二者、中間出息。 入息者,謂出息無間,內門風轉,乃至臍處。中間入息者,謂入息滅已,乃至出息未生,於其中間在停息處,暫時相似微細風起,是名中間入息。 如入息、中間入息,出息、中間出息,當知亦爾。此中差別者,謂入息無間,外門風轉,始從臍處,乃至面門、或至鼻端、或復出外。 入息、出息有二因緣。何等為二?一、牽引業;二、臍處孔穴,或上身分所有孔穴。 入息、出息有二所依。何等為二?一、身,二、心。所以者何?要依身心,入出息轉,如其所應。若唯依身而息轉者,入無想定、入滅盡定、生無想天諸有情類,彼息應轉。若唯依心而息轉者,入無色定、生無色界,彼息應轉。若唯依身心而轉,非如其所應者,入第四靜慮,若生於彼諸有情類,及羯羅藍、頞部曇、閉尸等位諸有情類,彼息應轉。然彼不轉。是故當知,要依身心,入出息轉,如其所應。 入息、出息有二種行。何等為二?一者、入息向下而行;二者、出息向上而行。 入息、出息有二種地。何等為二?一、麁孔穴,二、細孔穴。云何麁孔穴?謂從臍處孔穴乃至面門、鼻門,復從面門、鼻門乃至臍處孔穴。云何細孔穴?謂於身中一切毛孔。 入息、出息有四異名。何等為四?一名風,二名阿那波那,三名入息出息,四名身行。風名一種,是風共名;餘之三種,是不共名。 修入出息者有二過患。何等為二?一、太緩方便,二、太急方便。由太緩方便故,生起懈怠,或為惛沈睡眠纏擾其心,或令其心於外散亂。由太急方便故,或令其身生不平等,或令其心生不平等。云何令身生不平等?謂強用力持入出息。由入出息被執持故,便令身中不平風轉。由此最初於諸支節皆生戰掉,名能戰掉。此戰掉風若增長時,能生疾病。由是因緣,於諸支節生諸疾病。是名令身生不平等。云何令心生不平等?謂或令心生諸散亂,或為極重憂惱逼切。是名令心生不平等。 又此阿那波那念,應知略有五種修習。何等為五?一、算數修習,二、悟入諸蘊修習,三、悟入緣起修習,四、悟入聖諦修習,五、十六勝行修習。 云何名為算數修習?謂略有四種算數修習。 何等為四?一者、以一為一算數,二者、以二為一算數,三者、順算數,四者、逆算數。 云何以一為一算數?謂若入息入時,由緣入出息住念,數以為一。若入息滅,出息生,出向外時,數為第二。如是展轉數至其十。由此算數非略非廣,故唯至十。是名以一為一算數。 云何以二為一算數?謂若入息入而已滅,出息生而已出,爾時總合數以為一。即由如是算數道理,數至其十,是名以二為一算數。入息、出息說名為二,總合二種數之為一,故名以二為一算數。 云何順算數?謂或由以一為一算數,或由以二為一算數,順次展轉數至其十,名順算數。 云何逆算數?謂即由前二種算數,逆次展轉從第十數,次九、次八、次七、次六、次五、次四、次三、次二、次數其一,名逆算數。 若時行者,或以一為一算數為依,或以二為一算數為依,於順算數及逆算數已串修習,於其中間心無散亂。無散亂心善算數已,復應為說勝進算數。云何名為勝進算數?謂或依以一為一算數,或依以二為一算數,合二為一而算數之。 若依以一為一而算數者,即入息、出息二合為一。若依以二為一而算數者,即入息、出息四合為一。如是展轉數乃至十。如是後後漸增,乃至以百為一而算數之。由此以百為一算數,漸次數之乃至其十。如是勤修數息念者,乃至十十數以為一,漸次數之乃至滿十。由此以十為一算數,於其中間心無散亂,齊此名為已串修習。又此勤修數息念者,若於中間其心散亂,復應退還從初數起,或順、或逆。若時算數極串習故,其心自然乘任運道,安住入息、出息所緣,無斷無間相續而轉。先於入息有能取轉,入息滅已,於息空位有能取轉;次於出息有能取轉,出息滅已,於息空位有能取轉。如是展轉相續流注,無動無搖,無散亂行,有愛樂轉。齊此名為過算數地,不應復數。唯於入息、出息所緣,令心安住。於入出息應正隨行、應審了達。於入出息及二中間,若轉、若還分位差別,皆善覺了。如是名為算數修習。 又鈍根者,應為宣說如是息念算數修習。彼由此故,於散亂處,令心安住、令心愛樂。若異算數入出息念,彼心應為惛沈睡眠之所纏擾,或應彼心於外馳散。由正勤修數息念故,彼皆無有。若有利根,覺慧聰俊,不好乘此算數加行。 若為宣說算數加行,亦能速疾無倒了達,然不愛樂。 彼復於此入出息緣安住念已,若是處轉、若乃至轉、若如所轉、若時而轉,於此一切,由安住念,能正隨行,能正了達如是加行有如是相。於此加行若修、若習、若多修習為因緣故,起身輕安及心輕安,證一境性,於其所緣愛樂趣入。 如是彼於算數息念善修習已,復於所取、能取二事,作意思惟,悟入諸蘊。 云何悟入?謂於入息、出息及息所依身,作意思惟,悟入色蘊。於彼入息、出息能取念相應領納,作意思惟,悟入受蘊。即於彼念相應等了,作意思惟,悟入想蘊。即於彼念,若念相應思及慧等,作意思惟,悟入行蘊。若於彼念相應諸心、意、識,作意思惟,悟入識蘊。如是行者,於諸蘊中乃至多住,名已悟入。是名悟入諸蘊修習。 若時無倒,能見能知唯有諸蘊、唯有諸行、唯事、唯法。彼於爾時,能於諸行悟入緣起。 云何悟入?謂觀行者,如是尋求:此入出息何依何緣?既尋求已,如實悟入:此入出息依身緣身、依心緣心。復更尋求:此身此心何依何緣?既尋求已,如實悟入:此身此心依緣命根。復更尋求:如是命根何依何緣?既尋求已,如實悟入:如是命根依緣先行。復更尋求:如是先行何依何緣?既尋求已,如實悟入:如是先行依緣無明。 如是了知無明依緣先行,先行依緣命根,命根依緣身心,身心依緣入息、出息。又能了知無明滅故行滅,行滅故命根滅,命根滅故身心滅,身心滅故入出息滅。如是名為悟入緣起。彼於緣起悟入多住,名善習修。是名悟入緣起修習。 如是彼於緣起悟入善修習已,復於諸行如實了知從眾緣生,悟入無常。謂悟入諸行是無常故,本無而有,有已散滅。若是本無而有,有已散滅,即是生法、老法、病法、死法。若是生法、老法、病法、死法,即是其苦。若是其苦,即是無我,不得自在,遠離宰主。如是名為由無常、苦、空、無我行,悟入苦諦。 又彼如是能正悟入諸所有行眾緣生起,其性是苦,如病、如癰,一切皆以貪愛為緣。又正悟入即此能生眾苦貪愛若無餘斷,即是畢竟寂靜微妙。我若於此如是了知、如是觀見、如是多住,當於貪愛能無餘斷。如是名能悟入集諦、滅諦、道諦。於此悟入能多住已,於諸諦中證得現觀。是名悟入聖諦修習。 如是於聖諦中善修習已,於見道所斷一切煩惱皆悉永斷,唯餘修道所斷煩惱。為斷彼故,復進修習十六勝行。 云何名為十六勝行? 謂於念入息,我今能學念於入息;於念出息,我今能學念於出息。若長、若短。於覺了遍身入息,我今能學覺了遍身入息;於覺了遍身出息,我今能學覺了遍身出息。於息除身行入息,我今能學息除身行入息;於息除身行出息,我今能學息除身行出息。 於覺了喜入息,我今能學覺了喜入息;於覺了喜出息,我今能學覺了喜出息。於覺了樂入息,我今能學覺了樂入息;於覺了樂出息,我今能學覺了樂出息。於覺了心行入息,我今能學覺了心行入息;於覺了心行出息,我今能學覺了心行出息。於息除心行入息,我今能學息除心行入息;於息除心行出息,我今能學息除心行出息。 於覺了心入息,我今能學覺了心入息;於覺了心出息,我今能學覺了心出息。於喜悅心入息,我今能學喜悅心入息;於喜悅心出息,我今能學喜悅心出息。於制持心入息,我今能學制持心入息;於制持心出息,我今能學制持心出息。於解脫心入息,我今能學解脫心入息;於解脫心出息,我今能學解脫心出息。 於無常隨觀入息,我今能學無常隨觀入息;於無常隨觀出息,我今能學無常隨觀出息。於斷隨觀入息,我今能學斷隨觀入息;於斷隨觀出息,我今能學斷隨觀出息。於離欲隨觀入息,我今能學離欲隨觀入息;於離欲隨觀出息,我今能學離欲隨觀出息。於滅隨觀入息,我今能學滅隨觀入息;於滅隨觀出息,我今能學滅隨觀出息。 問:如是十六差別云何? 答:有學見迹已得四念住等,於入出息所緣作意復更進修,為斷餘結。是故念言:於念入息,我今能學念於入息;於念出息,我今能學念於出息。 若緣入息、出息境時,便作念言:我今能學念長入息、念長出息。若緣中間入息、中間出息境時,便作念言:我今能學念短入息、念短出息。如入息出息長轉,及中間入息、中間出息短轉,即如是了知。如是名為若長、若短。若緣身中微細孔穴,入息、出息周遍隨入諸毛孔中,緣此為境,起勝解時,便作念言:我於覺了遍身入息出息,我今能學覺了遍身入息出息。若於是時,或入息、中間入息已滅,出息、中間出息未生,緣入息出息空無位、入息出息遠離位為境;或出息、中間出息已滅,入息、中間入息未生,緣出息入息空無位、出息入息遠離位為境。即於此時便作念言:於息除身行入息,我今能學息除身行入息;於息除身行出息,我今能學息除身行出息。又即於此若修、若習、若多修習為因緣故,先未串習入出息時,所有剛強苦觸隨轉,今已串習入出息故,皆得息除,有餘柔軟樂觸隨轉。便作念言:於息除身行入息,我今能學息除身行入息;於息除身行出息,我今能學息除身行出息。 又於如是阿那波那念勤修行者,若得初靜慮,或得第二靜慮時,便作念言:於覺了喜入息出息,我今能學覺了喜入息出息。若得離喜第三靜慮時,便作念言:於覺了樂入息出息,我今能學覺了樂入息出息。第三靜慮已上,於阿那波那念無有更修加行道理,是故乃至第三靜慮,宣說息念加行所攝。 又即如是覺了喜者、覺了樂者,或有暫時生起忘念。或謂有我我所,或發我慢,或謂我當有,或謂我當無,或謂我當有色,或謂我當無色,或謂我當有想,或謂我當無想,或謂我當非有想非無想。生起如是愚癡想思俱行種種動慢、戲論、造作、貪愛;纔生起已,便能速疾以慧通達,不深染著,方便斷滅、除遣、變吐。由是加行,便作念言:於覺了心行入息出息,我今能學覺了心行入息出息;於息除心行入息出息,我今能學息除心行入息出息。 又若得根本第一、第二、第三靜慮,彼定已得初靜慮近分未至依定,依此觀察所生起心。謂如實知、如實覺了,或有貪心、或離貪心、或有瞋心、或離瞋心、或有癡心、或離癡心、略心、散心、下心、舉心、有掉動心、無掉動心、有寂靜心、無寂靜心、有等引心、無等引心、善修習心、不善修習心、善解脫心、不善解脫心。於如是心皆如實知、如實覺了,是故念言:於覺了心入息出息,我今能學覺了心入息出息。 彼若有時,見為惛沈睡眠蓋覆障其心,由極於內住寂止故,爾時於外隨緣一種淨妙境界,示現、教導、讚勵、慶喜,策發其心。是故念言:於喜悅心入息出息,我今能學喜悅心入息出息。 彼若有時,見為掉舉惡作蓋覆障其心,由極於外住囂舉故,爾時於內安住寂靜,制持其心。是故念言:於制持心入息出息,我今能學制持心入息出息。 若時於心善修、善習、善多修習為因緣故,令現行蓋皆得遠離,於諸蓋中心得清淨。是故念言:於解脫心入息出息,我今能學解脫心入息出息。 彼於諸蓋障修道者心已解脫,餘有隨眠,復應當斷。為斷彼故,起道現前。謂於諸行無常法性,極善精懇,如理觀察。是故念言:於無常隨觀入息出息,我今能學無常隨觀入息出息。 又彼先時,或依下三靜慮,或依未至依定,已於奢摩他修瑜伽行。今依無常隨觀,復於毘鉢舍那修瑜伽行。如是以奢摩他、毘鉢舍那熏修心已,於諸界中,從彼隨眠而求解脫。云何諸界?所謂三界。一者、斷界,二者、離欲界,三者、滅界。見道所斷一切行斷,名為斷界;修道所斷一切行斷,名離欲界;一切依滅,名為滅界。思惟如是三界寂靜、安隱、無患,修奢摩他、毘鉢舍那。彼由修習、多修習故,從餘修道所斷煩惱,心得解脫。是故念言:於斷隨觀、離欲隨觀、滅隨觀入息出息,我今能學斷隨觀、離欲隨觀、滅隨觀入息出息。 如是彼於見、修所斷一切煩惱皆永斷故,成阿羅漢,諸漏永盡。此後更無所應作事,於所決擇已得究竟。 是名十六勝行。 修習如是,名為五種修習阿那波那念。多尋思行補特伽羅,應於是中正勤修學,愛樂乘御。若於所緣有思遽務、有散亂者,於內各別應當親近如是觀行。 若於此中勤修習者,尋思散動皆無所有,心於所緣速疾安住,深生愛樂。是名第五多尋思行補特伽羅淨行所緣。 如是總名淨行所緣。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

第二瑜伽處第三目「所緣」。先標四種所緣(遍滿·淨行·善巧·淨惑),本子說頭兩種:遍滿所緣(一切觀行通用的四種影像,附《頡隸伐多經》)與淨行所緣——也就是對治五種行性的「五停心觀」(不淨治貪·慈愍治瞋·緣性緣起治癡·界差別治慢·阿那波那念治尋思)。名相留舊,逐句今語,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。

所緣總綱:四種所緣境事

什麼是所緣?就是有四種所緣境事。哪四種?一、遍滿所緣境事,二、淨行所緣境事,三、善巧所緣境事,四、淨惑所緣境事。〔本子說前二,善巧·淨惑見 13-02-03。〕

一、遍滿所緣(一切觀行通用的四種影像)

什麼是遍滿所緣境事?又有四種:一、有分別影像,二、無分別影像,三、事邊際性,四、所作成辦。

(一)有分別影像:什麼是有分別影像?就是有一種人,以聽聞正法、或受到教授教誡為依止,由見、由聞、由分別,對於「所知事的同分影像」,憑三摩呬多地(等引地·定地)的毗鉢舍那(觀)去觀察、簡擇、極簡擇、遍尋思、遍伺察。

這裡的「所知事」是什麼?就是:或不淨、或慈愍、或緣性緣起、或界差別、或阿那波那念,或蘊善巧、或界善巧、或處善巧、或緣起善巧、或處非處善巧,或下地的麁性、上地的靜性,或苦諦、集諦、滅諦、道諦。這些就名為所知事。

這所知事,憑教授教誡、或聽聞正法為依止,令定地的作意現前,就對那法起勝解、對那所知事起勝解。他這時對所知事,便如同正在親領受般、帶著勝解而轉。雖然那所知事並不是真的當前領受、和合現前,也不是別的同類之物,然而由定地的勝解,領受到一個「相似的作意」、領受到那所知事的「相似顯現」。由這道理,名為「所知事同分影像」。修觀行的人,推求這影像,便在那本性所知事中觀察、審定它的功德與過失。這就名為有分別影像。

(二)無分別影像:什麼是無分別影像?就是修觀行的人,取得這影像相之後,不再去觀察、簡擇、極簡擇、遍尋思、遍伺察,而只對這所緣影像,以奢摩他(止)行寂靜其心——也就是用九種行相令心安住:令心內住、等住、安住、近住、調伏、寂靜、最極寂靜、一趣、等持〔九住心〕。他這時便成就「無分別影像」所緣:對這所緣影像,一向一趣安住其念,不再觀察簡擇尋伺。這就名為無分別影像。

這個影像,也名影像、也名三摩地相、也名三摩地所行境界、也名三摩地口、也名三摩地門、也名作意處、也名內分別體、也名光影——這些都是「所知事同分影像」的種種異名。

(三)事邊際性:什麼是事邊際性?就是所緣的「盡所有性」與「如所有性」。什麼是盡所有性?就是色蘊之外更無餘色,受想行識蘊之外更無餘受想行識;一切有為事都被五法(色受想行識)所攝,一切諸法都被界、處所攝,一切所知事都被四聖諦所攝——這名為盡所有性(窮盡事相之量)。什麼是如所有性?就是所緣的真實性、真如性,由四道理(觀待·作用·證成·法爾)而具道理性——這名為如所有性(事相的真實本性)。所緣的盡所有性與如所有性,總說為一個「事邊際性」。

(四)所作成辦:什麼是所作成辦?就是修觀行的人,對奢摩他、毗鉢舍那若修、若習、若多修習,以此為因緣,種種緣影像的作意都得圓滿;由於作意圓滿,便得「轉依」,一切麁重(身心粗濁的種子)悉皆息滅;由於已得轉依,便「超過影像」——直接對所知事,生起無分別的現量智見。入初靜慮者,得初靜慮時,就在初靜慮所行境界生起這智見;入第二靜慮者,得第二靜慮時,就在第二靜慮所行境界生起這智見;入第三靜慮者,得第三靜慮時,就在第三靜慮所行境界生起這智見;入第四靜慮者,得第四靜慮時,就在第四靜慮所行境界生起這智見。入空無邊處者,得彼定時,就在空無邊處定所行境界生起這智見;入識無邊處者,得彼定時,就在識無邊處定所行境界生起這智見;入無所有處者,得彼定時,就在無所有處定所行境界生起這智見;入非想非非想處者,得彼定時,就在非想非非想處定所行境界生起這智見。這就名為所作成辦。

為何名「遍滿」:這四種所緣境事,遍行一切、隨入一切所緣境中,是過去、未來、現在的正等覺者共同宣說的,所以名遍滿所緣。又這所緣遍於毗鉢舍那品、遍於奢摩他品、遍於一切事、遍於真實事、遍於因果相屬事,所以名為遍滿。若說有分別影像,就是這裡所說的毗鉢舍那品;若說無分別影像,就是這裡所說的奢摩他品;若說事邊際性,就是這裡所說的一切事與真實事;若說所作成辦,就是這裡所說的因果相屬事。

附《頡隸伐多經》:如世尊曾為長老頡隸伐多說此義。曾聞長老頡隸伐多問世尊:「大德!諸有比丘勤修觀行、是瑜伽師,能於所緣安住其心。他為何於緣安住其心?怎樣於緣安住其心?到什麼程度才名心善安住?」佛讚許:「善哉善哉!你能問這義,今諦聽善思,我為你宣說。」

佛說:頡隸伐多!諸修觀行的瑜伽師能於所緣安住其心,他或樂淨行、或樂善巧、或樂令心解脫諸漏,於「相稱緣」安住其心、於「相似緣」安住其心、於「緣無倒」安住其心,並能於其中不捨靜慮。

——什麼是「於相稱緣安住其心」?就是那比丘若唯有貪行,應於不淨緣安住其心;若唯有瞋行,應於慈愍安住其心;若唯有癡行,應於緣性緣起安住其心;若唯有慢行,應於界差別安住其心;若唯有尋思行,應於阿那波那念安住其心〔五停心對五行〕。又若愚於諸行自相、愚於「我·有情·命者·生者·能養育者·補特伽羅」事,應於蘊善巧安住其心;若愚其因,於界善巧;若愚其緣,於處善巧;若愚無常苦空無我,於緣起、處非處善巧;若樂離欲界欲,於諸欲麁性、諸色靜性安住其心;若樂離色界欲,於諸色麁性、無色靜性;若樂通達及解脫遍一切處的薩迦耶事,於苦集滅道四諦安住其心。這就名為於相稱緣安住其心(藥對病)。

——什麼是「於相似緣安住其心」?就是那比丘為了簡擇、極簡擇、遍尋思、遍伺察那所知事,於先前所見、所聞、所覺、所知之事,憑見聞覺知的增上力,以定地作意思惟分別而起勝解;雖不能把本所知事和合現前觀察,卻能生起與本事相似之相,對那所緣有相似的「唯智、唯見、唯正憶念」;又於時時間令心寂靜,於時時間依增上慧的法毗鉢舍那勤修觀行。這名為於相似緣安住其心(緣影像而非緣本事)。

——什麼是「於緣無倒安住其心」?就是那瑜伽師於所緣境安住其心,隨所應而解了所知境界,如實無倒地遍了知。這名為於緣無倒安住其心。

——什麼是「能於其中不捨靜慮」?就是那瑜伽師如是於緣正修行時,以無間加行、殷重加行,於時時間修習「止相、舉相、捨相」;由修習、多修習為因緣,一切麁重悉皆息滅,隨而觸證「所依清淨」;於所知事由現見故,觸證「所緣清淨」;由離貪故,觸證「心遍清淨」;離無明故,觸證「智遍清淨」。這名為能於其中不捨靜慮。頡隸伐多!這比丘如是於所緣境安住其心、如是安住心已,名為善安住。

世尊於此重說一頌:「行者行諸相,知一切實義,常於影靜慮,得證遍清淨。」——「行者行諸相」說的是於止、舉、捨相無間殷重修行;「知一切實義」說的是事邊際性;「常於影靜慮」說的是有分別影像、無分別影像;「得證遍清淨」說的是所作成辦。世尊又說一頌:「於心相遍知,能受遠離味;靜慮常委念,受喜樂離染。」——「於心相遍知」謂以「心相」之名說有分別、無分別影像,以「遍知」之名說事邊際性;「能受遠離味」說的是於所緣樂斷樂修;「靜慮常委念」說的是於止觀常勤修習、委練(細密熟練)修習;「受喜樂離染」說的是所作成辦。應知這樣的遍滿所緣,隨順淨教、契合正理。這就名為遍滿所緣。

二、淨行所緣(五停心觀)

什麼名為淨行所緣?就是不淨、慈愍、緣性緣起、界差別、阿那波那念等所緣的差別。

(一)不淨所緣——對治貪行

什麼是不淨所緣?就是略說有六種不淨:一、朽穢不淨,二、苦惱不淨,三、下劣不淨,四、觀待不淨,五、煩惱不淨,六、速壞不淨。

什麼叫作朽穢不淨?這種不淨略依二種而說:一、依內,二、依外。什麼是依內朽穢不淨?就是這身中的髮、毛、爪、齒、塵、垢、皮、肉、骸、骨、筋、脈、心、膽、肝、肺、大腸、小腸、生藏、熟藏、肚、胃、脾、腎、膿、血、熱痰、肪、膏、肌、髓、腦、膜、鼻涕、唾液、淚、汗、屎、尿。這些同類事物,名為依內朽穢不淨。什麼是依外朽穢不淨?就是或青瘀、或膿爛、或變壞、或膖脹、或被食噉、或變赤、或散壞、或骨、或骨鎖、或骨與骨鎖、或由屎所成、或由尿所成、或由唾液所成、或由鼻涕所成、或被血塗污、或被膿塗污、或大小便的污穢處。這些同類事物,名為依外朽穢不淨。依內與依外的朽穢不淨,總合說為一種朽穢不淨。

什麼叫作苦惱不淨?就是以隨順苦受的觸為緣,所生起的身體或心理不平等感受;它屬於受蘊所攝。這就名為苦惱不淨。

什麼叫作下劣不淨?就是最下劣的事、最下劣的界,也就是欲界。除了欲界以外,再也找不到更下、更劣、更為鄙穢的其餘界。這就名為下劣不淨。

什麼叫作觀待不淨?就是一種較劣的清淨事,與其餘更殊勝的清淨事相對時,便顯得不淨。例如,與無色界的殊勝清淨事相對時,色界諸法便顯得不淨;與薩迦耶寂滅的涅槃相對時,從欲界直到有頂都顯得不淨。這些同類情形,一切都名為觀待不淨。

什麼叫作煩惱不淨?就是三界之中所有的一切結、縛、隨眠、隨煩惱與纏,這一切都名為煩惱不淨。

什麼叫作速壞不淨?就是五取蘊具有無常、無恒、不可保信、終必變壞的法性。這就名為速壞不淨。

這樣的六種不淨,為什麼是能使「貪行」清淨的所緣?因為貪有五種:一、於內身的「欲欲欲貪」,二、於外身的「婬欲婬貪」,三、境欲境貪,四、色欲色貪,五、薩迦耶欲薩迦耶貪——這名五貪。為令這五種欲貪斷滅、除遣、不現行,便建立六種不淨所緣:  由依內朽穢不淨所緣,令對內身的欲欲欲貪,心得清淨。  由依外朽穢不淨所緣,令對外身的婬欲婬貪,心得清淨。婬相應貪又有四種:一、顯色貪,二、形色貪,三、妙觸貪,四、承事貪;由依四種「外不淨所緣」,對這四種婬貪令心清淨——若於青瘀、膿爛、變壞、膖脹、食噉作意思惟,對「顯色貪」令心清淨;若於變赤作意思惟,對「形色貪」令心清淨;若於骨、鎖、骨鎖作意思惟,對「妙觸貪」令心清淨;若於散壞作意思惟,對「承事貪」令心清淨。這四種名為對婬貪令心清淨。

是故世尊就「依外朽穢不淨」的種種差別,都依四種「憺怕路」(屍陀林·停屍處)而建立:  若說「由憺怕路見諸屍,死經一日、二日、乃至七日,被烏鵲、餓狗、鵄鷲、狐狼、野干、禽獸所食噉,便取其相,以譬自身亦如是性、如是類,不能超過如是法性」——這顯示從青瘀乃至食噉。  若說「由憺怕路見諸屍,離皮肉血、筋脈纏裹」——這顯示變赤。  若說「由憺怕路見諸骨,或骨、或鎖」——這顯示骨、鎖、骨鎖。  若說「由憺怕路見諸骨,手骨、足骨、臗骨、膝骨、臂骨、肘骨、脊骨、髆骨、肋骨、頷輪、齒鬘、頂髑髏等各各分散,或經一年二三乃至七年,其色鮮白猶如螺貝、或如鴿色,或見彼骨和雜塵土」——這顯示散壞。

如此依外的朽穢不淨所緣,令對四種婬相應貪心得清淨;由苦惱、下劣二不淨所緣,令對「境相應」的欲貪心得清淨;由觀待不淨所緣,令對「色相應」的欲貪心得清淨;由煩惱、速壞二不淨所緣,令對「從欲界乃至有頂諸薩迦耶」的欲貪心得清淨。這名為貪行的淨行所緣——以上且就「能淨貪行」,總說一切通治所攝的不淨所緣。今此義中,本意唯取「朽穢不淨」(其餘五種不淨,也分別是其餘淨行所緣所攝)。

(二)慈愍所緣——對治瞋行

什麼是慈愍所緣?就是對親品、或怨品、或中品,平等安住「利益意樂」(願其得益之心),能引下中上品快樂的定地勝解。當知這裡:親品、怨品、中品三者是「所緣」;利益意樂、能引快樂的定地勝解是「能緣」;所緣、能緣總略為一,名慈愍所緣。

若經說「慈俱心」,這即顯示對親怨中三品所緣的利益意樂。若說「無怨、無敵、無損害」,這顯示利益意樂的三種相:由無怨故名增上利益意樂,此無怨性由「無敵對」(不欲相違諍)與「無損惱」(不欲不饒益)二句所顯。若說「廣大無量」,這顯示能引下中上品快樂——欲界快樂名「廣」,初二靜慮地快樂名「大」,第三靜慮地快樂名「無量」。若說「勝解遍滿具足住」,這顯示能引快樂的定地勝解,此勝解即是能引快樂利益增上意樂所攝的勝解作意俱行。若對「無苦無樂」的親怨中三品有情平等欲與其樂,當知是「慈」;若對「有苦、有樂」的三品有情平等欲拔其苦、欲慶其樂,當知是「悲、是喜」——有苦有情是悲所緣,有樂有情是喜所緣。這名慈愍所緣。若有瞋行補特伽羅,於諸有情修習慈愍,令瞋微薄,名於瞋恚心得清淨。

〔本地分中聲聞地第十三第二瑜伽處之二〕

(三)緣性緣起所緣——對治癡行

什麼是緣性緣起所緣?就是於三世唯行、唯法、唯事、唯因、唯果,墮入正道理——也就是觀待道理、作用道理、證成道理、法爾道理(四道理):唯有諸法能引諸法,無有作者、也無受者。這名緣性緣起所緣。對這所緣作意思惟,癡行增上補特伽羅的一切癡行皆得微薄,於諸癡行心得清淨。這就名為緣性緣起所緣。

(四)界差別所緣——對治慢行

什麼是界差別所緣?就是六界差別:一、地界,二、水界,三、火界,四、風界,五、空界,六、識界。

什麼是地界?地界有二:一、內地界,二、外地界。內地界,是這身體內部各別的堅實性;它屬於堅硬,也屬於地大,與身體親附而為身心所執取。內地界具體是什麼?就是髮、毛、爪、齒、塵垢、皮、肉、骸骨、筋、脈、肝、膽、心、肺、脾、腎、肚、胃、大腸、小腸、生藏、熟藏,以及糞穢等,這些名為內地界。外地界,是外在的堅實性;它屬於堅硬,也屬於地大,不與身體親附,也不為身心所執取。外地界具體是什麼?就是瓦、木、土塊、砂礫、樹木、石頭、山、巖等,這些名為外地界。

什麼是水界?水界有二:一、內水界,二、外水界。內水界,是這身體內部各別的濕潤性;它屬於濕潤,也屬於水大,與身體親附而為身心所執取。內水界具體是什麼?就是淚、汗、鼻涕、唾液、肪、膏、脂、髓、熱痰、膿血、腦、膜、尿等,這些名為內水界。外水界,是外在的濕潤性;它屬於濕潤,也屬於水大,不與身體親附,也不為身心所執取。外水界具體是什麼?就是井、泉、池、沼、陂、湖、河、海等,這些名為外水界。

什麼是火界?火界有二:一、內火界,二、外火界。內火界,是這身體內部各別的溫熱性;它屬於溫熱,也屬於煖性,與身體親附而為身心所執取。內火界具體是什麼?就是身體中所有的溫煖,能使身體發熱、均勻發熱、周遍發熱;由於這種溫煖,所吃、所喝、所嚼、所嘗的飲食容易正常消化變化;它若增盛,便歸入蒸熱一類。這些名為內火界。外火界,是外在的溫熱性;它屬於溫熱,也屬於煖性,不與身體親附,也不為身心所執取。外火界具體是什麼?就是人間依鑽燧、牛糞末等求得的火;火生起以後,能燒牛糞、草、薪、榛叢、曠野、山、洲渚、村落或村落的一部分、城市或城市的一部分、國土或國土的一部分,以及其餘同類事物。這些名為外火界。

什麼是風界?風界有二:一、內風界,二、外風界。內風界,是這身體內部各別的風性;它屬於風吹飄動,具有輕性與動性,與身體親附而為身心所執取。內風界具體是什麼?就是身中有上行風、下行風、脇臥風、脊臥風、腰間風、臗間風、小刀風、大刀風、針刺風、畢鉢羅風、入出息風、隨支節風。這些名為內風界。外風界,是外在的風性;它屬於風吹飄動,具有輕性與動性,不與身體親附,也不為身心所執取。外風界具體是什麼?就是身外的東來風、西來風、南來風、北來風、有塵風、無塵風、狹小風、廣大風、毘濕婆風、吠藍婆風、風輪風。有時大風突然生起而聚集,折斷樹木、吹倒牆壁、崩壞山岳、激盪大海;吹動過後,它無所依憑,自然止息。若有情想要得風,便抖動衣服、搖扇,或搖動多羅樹葉。這些名為外風界。

什麼是空界?就是眼、耳、鼻、口、咽喉等處所有的孔穴;由這些孔穴吞咽,在這些孔穴中吞咽,吞咽以後,又由這些孔穴向下漏泄。這些同類的孔穴,名為空界。

什麼是識界?就是眼識、耳識、鼻識、舌識、身識、意識;又有心、意、識三種差別。這就名為識界。

若諸慢行補特伽羅,於界差別作意思惟,便於身中離開「一合想」(把身當作渾然一體之想),得「不淨想」,無復高舉,憍慢微薄,於諸慢行心得清淨。這名慢行補特伽羅由界差別的淨行所緣。

(五)阿那波那念所緣——對治尋思行

什麼是阿那波那念所緣?就是緣入息、出息的念,名阿那波那念;此念所緣的入出息等,名阿那波那念所緣。

當知這裡,入息有二。哪二種?一、入息,二、中間入息。什麼是入息?就是出息之後沒有間隔,風從內門轉入,一直到臍處。什麼是中間入息?就是入息已滅、出息還未生起時,在兩者中間的停息處,暫時生起彷彿是氣息的微細風,這名中間入息。

出息也有二。哪二種?一、出息,二、中間出息。它們的情形如同入息與中間入息;差別在於,出息是入息之後沒有間隔,風從外門轉出,從臍處開始,一直到面門,或到鼻端,或再出到身外。中間出息,則是出息已滅、入息還未生起時,在中間停息處暫時生起的微細風。

入息、出息有二種因緣。哪二種?一、牽引業,二、臍處的孔穴,或上半身所有的孔穴。

入息、出息有二種所依。哪二種?一、身,二、心。為什麼?因為必須依身、依心,而且各如其所應,入出息才會運轉。假使只依身而有息,進入無想定、進入滅盡定,以及生在無想天的有情,也應當有息運轉;但他們並沒有。假使只依心而有息,進入無色定或生在無色界的有情,也應當有息運轉;但他們並沒有。假使只要依身心便有息,而不必各如其所應,那麼進入第四靜慮、生在第四靜慮的有情,以及處在羯羅藍、頞部曇、閉尸等胎位的有情,也應當有息運轉;但他們並沒有。因此應知,必須依身、依心,而且各如其所應,入出息才會運轉。

入息、出息有二種行向。哪二種?一、入息向下而行,二、出息向上而行。

入息、出息有二種運行處。哪二種?一、麁孔穴,二、細孔穴。什麼是麁孔穴?就是從臍處的孔穴到面門、鼻門,再從面門、鼻門到臍處的孔穴。什麼是細孔穴?就是身中的一切毛孔。

入息、出息有四種異名。哪四種?一名風,二名阿那波那,三名入息出息,四名身行。「風」這一名是各種風共通的名稱;其餘三名,是入出息特有的名稱。

修入出息有二種過患。哪二種?一、用功太緩,二、用功太急。由用功太緩,便生起懈怠,或被惛沈睡眠纏擾其心,或使心向外散亂。由用功太急,便使身體不平衡,或使心不平衡。怎樣使身體不平衡?就是強行用力把持入出息;入出息被強持,便使身中不調和的風運轉,最初令各處肢節都生起顫動,所以名為「能戰掉」。這顫動之風若再增長,便能引生疾病,因此在各處肢節生起各種疾病,這名使身體不平衡。怎樣使心不平衡?就是使心生起種種散亂,或被極重的憂惱逼迫,這名使心不平衡。

又這阿那波那念,應知略有五種修習:一、算數修習,二、悟入諸蘊修習,三、悟入緣起修習,四、悟入聖諦修習,五、十六勝行修習。

1. 算數修習:略有四種——以一為一、以二為一、順算數、逆算數。  「以一為一算數」:入息入時緣入出息住念,數為一;入息滅、出息生而出向外時,數為第二;如是展轉數至其十(不略不廣,故唯至十)。  「以二為一算數」:入息入而已滅、出息生而已出時,總合二者數為一,數至其十——入出息名為二,總合數之為一,故名以二為一。  「順算數」:或以一為一、或以二為一,順次展轉數至其十。  「逆算數」:即由前二,逆次從第十、九、八、七、六、五、四、三、二、一而數。  行者於順逆算數已串修習、中間心無散亂後,再為說「勝進算數」:合二為一而算——若依「以一為一」則入出息二合為一,若依「以二為一」則入出息四合為一,如是展轉數至十;後後漸增,乃至「以百為一」而算。由這「以百為一」的算數,漸次數到十;如此勤修數息念,乃至「十十數以為一」,再漸次數到滿十。由這「以十為一」的算數,中間心無散亂,齊此名「已串修習」。中間若心散亂,應退還從初數起(或順或逆)。算數極串習故,心自然乘任運道,安住入出息所緣,無斷無間相續而轉——於入息能取、入息滅已於「息空位」能取,於出息能取、出息滅已於息空位能取,如是相續流注、無動無搖、無散亂行、有愛樂轉,齊此名「過算數地」,不應復數,唯令心安住入息、出息所緣。對入出息應正確隨行、審慎了達;對入息、出息及兩個中間息的轉、還分位差別,都善能覺了。這名算數修習。  又:鈍根者應為說此息念算數修習,他由此於散亂處令心安住愛樂;若不修算數,其心便為惛沈睡眠所擾、或於外馳散,由勤修數息便皆無有。若是利根、覺慧聰俊,不好乘此算數加行(雖為說也能速疾無倒了達,然不愛樂)。他於入出息緣安住念後,對「是處轉、乃至轉、如所轉、時而轉」一切,皆由安住念能正隨行、正了達;於此加行若多修習為因緣,便起身輕安、心輕安,證得一境性,於所緣愛樂趣入。

2. 悟入諸蘊修習:他於算數息念善修習後,復於「所取、能取」二事作意思惟,悟入諸蘊——於入出息及息所依的身作意思惟,悟入色蘊;於那能取息的念相應的領納作意思惟,悟入受蘊;於那念相應的等了(取像)作意思惟,悟入想蘊;於那念若相應的思及慧等作意思惟,悟入行蘊;於那念相應的諸心意識作意思惟,悟入識蘊。如是於諸蘊中乃至多住,名已悟入。這名悟入諸蘊修習。

3. 悟入緣起修習:若無倒能見能知唯有諸蘊、唯有諸行、唯事、唯法,他便能於諸行悟入緣起。怎麼悟入?觀行者如是尋求:「此入出息何依何緣?」既尋求已,如實悟入:此入出息依身緣身、依心緣心。又尋求:「此身心何依何緣?」悟入:依緣命根。又尋求:「命根何依何緣?」悟入:依緣先行(過去業)。又尋求:「先行何依何緣?」悟入:依緣無明。如是了知無明緣行、行緣命根、命根緣身心、身心緣入出息;又了知無明滅故行滅、行滅故命根滅、命根滅故身心滅、身心滅故入出息滅。這名悟入緣起。於緣起悟入多住,名善習修。這名悟入緣起修習。

4. 悟入聖諦修習:他於緣起善修習後,復於諸行如實了知從眾緣生,悟入無常——諸行無常故本無而有、有已散滅;若本無而有、有已散滅,即是生法、老法、病法、死法;若是生老病死法,即是苦;若是苦,即是無我、不得自在、遠離宰主。如是由無常、苦、空、無我行悟入苦諦。又正悟入諸有為行眾緣生起其性是苦,如病、如癰,一切皆以貪愛為緣;又悟入這能生眾苦的貪愛若無餘斷,即是畢竟寂靜微妙——「我若於此如是了知、觀見、多住,當能無餘斷貪愛」。如是悟入集諦、滅諦、道諦。於此悟入多住,便於諸諦中證得現觀。這名悟入聖諦修習。

5. 十六勝行修習:他於聖諦中善修習後,於見道所斷一切煩惱皆悉永斷,唯餘修道所斷煩惱;為斷彼故,復進修「十六勝行」。什麼是十六勝行?  (1)對於有念的入息,我現在能學習:有念地入息;對於有念的出息,我現在能學習:有念地出息。  (2)息或長,或短。  (3)對於覺了全身的入息,我現在能學習:覺了全身而入息;對於覺了全身的出息,我現在能學習:覺了全身而出息。  (4)對於止息身行的入息,我現在能學習:止息身行而入息;對於止息身行的出息,我現在能學習:止息身行而出息。  (5)對於覺了喜的入息,我現在能學習:覺了喜而入息;對於覺了喜的出息,我現在能學習:覺了喜而出息。  (6)對於覺了樂的入息,我現在能學習:覺了樂而入息;對於覺了樂的出息,我現在能學習:覺了樂而出息。  (7)對於覺了心行的入息,我現在能學習:覺了心行而入息;對於覺了心行的出息,我現在能學習:覺了心行而出息。  (8)對於止息心行的入息,我現在能學習:止息心行而入息;對於止息心行的出息,我現在能學習:止息心行而出息。  (9)對於覺了心的入息,我現在能學習:覺了心而入息;對於覺了心的出息,我現在能學習:覺了心而出息。  (10)對於喜悅心的入息,我現在能學習:喜悅其心而入息;對於喜悅心的出息,我現在能學習:喜悅其心而出息。  (11)對於制持心的入息,我現在能學習:制持其心而入息;對於制持心的出息,我現在能學習:制持其心而出息。  (12)對於解脫心的入息,我現在能學習:解脫其心而入息;對於解脫心的出息,我現在能學習:解脫其心而出息。  (13)對於隨觀無常的入息,我現在能學習:隨觀無常而入息;對於隨觀無常的出息,我現在能學習:隨觀無常而出息。  (14)對於隨觀斷的入息,我現在能學習:隨觀斷而入息;對於隨觀斷的出息,我現在能學習:隨觀斷而出息。  (15)對於隨觀離欲的入息,我現在能學習:隨觀離欲而入息;對於隨觀離欲的出息,我現在能學習:隨觀離欲而出息。  (16)對於隨觀滅的入息,我現在能學習:隨觀滅而入息;對於隨觀滅的出息,我現在能學習:隨觀滅而出息。

問:這十六的差別怎麼說?答:  有學見迹(已見道)已得四念住等,於入出息所緣作意更進修、為斷餘結,故念「念入息/念出息」〔第1〕。緣入出息境時念「念長入息出息」、緣中間入出息境時念「念短」,如其長短即如是了知,是名「若長若短」〔第2〕。若緣身中微細孔穴、入出息周遍隨入諸毛孔而起勝解,便念「覺了遍身入息出息」〔第3〕。若入息(及中間入息)已滅、出息(及中間出息)未生,緣入出息空無位、遠離位為境;或出息已滅、入息未生,緣其空無位、遠離位為境〔此二句底本作「出息…入息未生」,聖本「出/入」二字互易(0432c15)——底本從大正讀,聖本異讀並錄〕——便念「息除身行入息出息」;又由多修習故,先前未串習時剛強的苦觸隨轉,今已串習則皆息除、有柔軟樂觸隨轉,便念「息除身行」〔第4〕。  又勤修者若得初靜慮、或第二靜慮時,便念「覺了喜入息出息」〔第5〕;若得離喜的第三靜慮時,念「覺了樂」〔第6〕。第三靜慮以上,於阿那波那念無更修加行之理,故乃至第三靜慮宣說息念加行所攝。又覺了喜、覺了樂者或暫生忘念——或謂有我我所、或發我慢、或謂我當有/當無/當有色/當無色/當有想/當無想/當非有想非無想,生起這些愚癡想思俱行的動慢、戲論、造作、貪愛;纔生起便速疾以慧通達、不深染著,方便斷滅除遣變吐——由此加行便念「覺了心行入息出息」〔第7〕、「息除心行」〔第8〕。  又若得根本第一二三靜慮(或所得初靜慮近分未至依定),依此觀察所生起的心:如實知如實覺了——或有貪心/離貪心、有瞋心/離瞋心、有癡心/離癡心、略心/散心、下心/舉心、有掉動心/無掉動心、有寂靜心/無寂靜心、有等引心/無等引心、善修習心/不善修習心、善解脫心/不善解脫心——皆如實知,故念「覺了心入息出息」〔第9〕。若見惛沈睡眠蓋覆障其心,由極於內住寂止故,便於外隨緣一種淨妙境界示現、教導、讚勵、慶喜,策發其心,故念「喜悅心」〔第10〕。若見掉舉惡作蓋覆障其心,由極於外住囂舉故,便於內安住寂靜、制持其心,故念「制持心」〔第11〕。若心善修習故令現行蓋皆得遠離、於諸蓋中心得清淨,故念「解脫心」〔第12〕。  他於諸蓋已心解脫,餘有隨眠應斷;為斷彼起道現前,於諸行無常法性極善精懇如理觀察,故念「無常隨觀」〔第13〕。又彼先依下三靜慮或未至依定已於奢摩他修瑜伽行,今依無常隨觀復於毗鉢舍那修瑜伽行;如是止觀熏修心已,於諸界中從隨眠求解脫。什麼諸界?所謂三界:一斷界(見道所斷一切行斷),二離欲界(修道所斷一切行斷),三滅界(一切依滅)。思惟這三界寂靜、安隱、無患,修止觀;由多修習故,從餘修道所斷煩惱心得解脫,故念「斷隨觀、離欲隨觀、滅隨觀入息出息」〔第14、15、16〕。如是於見、修所斷一切煩惱皆永斷故,成阿羅漢、諸漏永盡,此後更無所應作事、於所決擇已得究竟。這名十六勝行。

如是修習,名為五種修習阿那波那念。多尋思行補特伽羅應於此正勤修學、愛樂乘御;若於所緣有思慮遽務、有散亂者,應於內各別親近這觀行。若於此勤修習,尋思散動皆無所有,心於所緣速疾安住、深生愛樂——這就名第五「多尋思行補特伽羅」的淨行所緣。

如是總名淨行所緣。

The third item of the Second Yoga-Station, "the object (ālambana)." It first sets out four kinds of object (pervasive · conduct-purifying · skill-in-means · defilement-cleansing); this file covers the first two: the pervasive object (the four images that all contemplative practice holds in common, with the appended Revata-sūtra) and the conduct-purifying objects — that is, the "five mind-stilling contemplations" that counter five kinds of conduct-disposition (the impure counters greed · loving-kindness counters hatred · the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures counters delusion · element-analysis counters conceit · mindfulness of breathing counters discursive thinking). Technical terms are kept in their old forms, rendered phrase by phrase into today's language, without adding doctrinal exposition, without citing śāstra, without annotating Sanskrit; where the treatise-text compresses, it is filled back out within 〔brackets〕.

The Overall Framework of the Object: The Four Kinds of Objective Field

What is the object? It is that there are four kinds of objective field. Which four? First, the pervasive objective field; second, the conduct-purifying objective field; third, the skill-in-means objective field; fourth, the defilement-cleansing objective field. 〔This file covers the first two; for skill-in-means and defilement-cleansing, see 13-02-03.〕

One. The Pervasive Object (the Four Images That All Contemplative Practice Holds in Common)

What is the pervasive objective field? It too is of four kinds: first, the image accompanied by discernment; second, the image without discernment; third, the exhaustive extent of the entity; fourth, the accomplishment of the task.

(1) The image accompanied by discernment: What is the image accompanied by discernment? There is a certain person who, taking as his basis either hearing the true Dharma or receiving instruction and admonition, and by way of seeing, of hearing, of discerning, examines, discriminates, thoroughly discriminates, thoroughly investigates, and thoroughly scrutinizes — by the insight-practice (vipaśyanā) of the stage of meditative equipoise (the stage of equipoise · the stage of concentration) — the "image concordant with the object-to-be-known."

What is this "object-to-be-known" here? It is: either the impure, or loving-kindness, or the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures, or element-analysis, or mindfulness of breathing; or skill regarding the aggregates, skill regarding the elements, skill regarding the sense-bases, skill regarding dependent origination, skill regarding what-is-and-is-not-a-basis; or the coarseness of a lower stage and the calmness of a higher stage; or the truth of suffering, the truth of origination, the truth of cessation, the truth of the path. These are named the object-to-be-known.

As for this object-to-be-known: taking as his basis either instruction and admonition or hearing the true Dharma, he brings the attention of the stage of equipoise before him, and toward that dharma he gives rise to resolute conviction, and toward that object-to-be-known he gives rise to resolute conviction. At that time, toward the object-to-be-known, he proceeds bearing resolute conviction as though he were directly receiving it in person. Although that object-to-be-known is not truly presently received, not conjoined and present before him, and is also not some other thing of the same type, nevertheless, through the resolute conviction of the stage of equipoise, he receives a "concordant attention" and receives a "concordant manifestation" of that object-to-be-known. By this principle it is named "the image concordant with the object-to-be-known." The practitioner of contemplation, seeking out this image, thereupon examines and determines its merits and faults within that original-nature object-to-be-known. This is named the image accompanied by discernment.

(2) The image without discernment: What is the image without discernment? The practitioner of contemplation, having taken up this image-mark, no longer examines, discriminates, thoroughly discriminates, thoroughly investigates, or thoroughly scrutinizes; rather, toward this objective image alone, he stills his mind by the practice of tranquillity (śamatha) — that is, he settles the mind by nine modes of activity: settling the mind inwardly, settling it evenly, settling it steadily, settling it closely, taming, stilling, utterly stilling, making it single-directed, and holding it evenly 〔the nine mind-settlings〕. At that time he then accomplishes the object that is "the image without discernment": toward this objective image, single-directedly and in one direction he settles his mindfulness upon it, no longer examining, discriminating, investigating, or scrutinizing. This is named the image without discernment.

This image is also named the image; also named the mark of concentration; also named the field ranged over by concentration; also named the mouth of concentration; also named the gateway of concentration; also named the locus of attention; also named the inner discerning-substance; also named the light-reflection — these are all various alternative names for "the image concordant with the object-to-be-known."

(3) The exhaustive extent of the entity: What is the exhaustive extent of the entity? It is the "extent of what there is" and the "way that things truly are" of the object. What is the extent of what there is? It is that apart from the form-aggregate there is no further form, and apart from the aggregates of feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness there is no further feeling, perception, formations, or consciousness; that all conditioned entities are subsumed by the five dharmas (form, feeling, perception, formations, consciousness), that all dharmas are subsumed by the elements and the sense-bases, that all objects-to-be-known are subsumed by the four noble truths — this is named the extent of what there is (the exhausting of the measure of the entity's characteristics). What is the way that things truly are? It is that the object is the truly-real nature, the nature of suchness, possessing rational-nature through the four principles (of dependence · of function · of proving-establishment · of the way-things-are) — this is named the way that things truly are (the truly-real basic nature of the entity's characteristics). The extent-of-what-there-is and the way-things-truly-are of the object are together stated as a single "exhaustive extent of the entity."

(4) The accomplishment of the task: What is the accomplishment of the task? Taking the cultivation, repeated practice, and abundant cultivation of tranquillity and insight as cause and condition, the practitioner brings to fullness all the varieties of attention that take an image as their object. Because those attentions are full, he attains transformation of the basis, and all coarse and heavy states wholly cease. Because he has attained transformation of the basis, he passes beyond the image and directly gives rise to non-discerning, direct-perception knowledge and vision of the object to be known. One who enters the first absorption gives rise to this knowledge and vision in the field of the first absorption when he attains it. One who enters the second absorption does so in the field of the second absorption; one who enters the third, in the field of the third; and one who enters the fourth, in the field of the fourth. One who enters the base of the infinity of space, the infinity of consciousness, nothing-whatever, or neither-perception-nor-non-perception gives rise to this knowledge and vision in the field of that respective attainment when he attains it. This is named the accomplishment of the task.

Why it is named "pervasive": these four objective fields course through everything and enter into every objective field, and they are what the Fully and Perfectly Awakened Ones of past, future, and present proclaim in common. Therefore they are named the pervasive object. Again, this object pervades the class of insight, the class of tranquillity, all entities, the truly real entity, and entities in which cause and effect belong together. Therefore it is named pervasive. When the image accompanied by discernment is spoken of, it is the class of insight spoken of here. When the image without discernment is spoken of, it is the class of tranquillity. When the exhaustive extent of the entity is spoken of, it is all entities and the truly real entity. When the accomplishment of the task is spoken of, it is the entity in which cause and effect belong together.

Appended: the Revata-sūtra: as the World-Honored One once explained this meaning for the elder Revata. It was heard that the elder Revata asked the World-Honored One: "Venerable one! When the various monks who diligently cultivate contemplation, being yoga practitioners, are able to settle their minds upon an object — for what reason do they settle their minds upon an object? How do they settle their minds upon an object? To what degree is the mind then named 'well settled'?" The Buddha commended him: "Well said, well said! You are able to ask this meaning. Now listen closely and reflect well, and I will proclaim it for you."

The Buddha said: Revata! The yoga practitioners who cultivate contemplation are able to settle their minds upon an object; whether they delight in conduct-purifying, or delight in skill-in-means, or delight in freeing the mind from the outflows, they settle their minds upon a "concordant object," settle their minds upon a "resembling object," settle their minds upon "the object without error," and are able therein not to relinquish meditative absorption.

—— What is "settling the mind upon a concordant object"? It is that if a monk has only greed-conduct, he should settle his mind upon the impure object; if he has only hatred-conduct, he should settle his mind upon loving-kindness; if he has only delusion-conduct, he should settle his mind upon the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures; if he has only conceit-conduct, he should settle his mind upon element-analysis; if he has only discursive-thinking-conduct, he should settle his mind upon mindfulness of breathing 〔the five mind-stillings against the five conducts〕. Again, if he is confused about the particular marks of the formations, and confused about the matter of "self · sentient being · living being · one-who-is-born · one-who-can-nourish · person," he should settle his mind upon skill regarding the aggregates; if he is confused about their cause, upon skill regarding the elements; if he is confused about their condition, upon skill regarding the sense-bases; if he is confused about impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and no-self, upon skill regarding dependent origination and what-is-and-is-not-a-basis; if he delights in departing from the desire of the desire-realm, he should settle his mind upon the coarseness of the desires and the calmness of forms; if he delights in departing from the desire of the form-realm, upon the coarseness of forms and the calmness of the formless; if he delights in penetrating and in being liberated from the all-pervasive substantialist-view of self (satkāya), he should settle his mind upon the four truths of suffering, origination, cessation, and the path. This is named settling the mind upon a concordant object (the medicine matched to the disease).

—— What is "settling the mind upon a resembling object"? It is that the monk, in order to discriminate, thoroughly discriminate, thoroughly investigate, and thoroughly scrutinize that object-to-be-known, gives rise to resolute conviction by contemplating and discerning, with the attention of the stage of equipoise, that which was previously seen, heard, sensed, and known — by the dominant force of seeing, hearing, sensing, and knowing. Although he cannot conjoin the original object-to-be-known and examine it present before him, he is able to generate a mark resembling the original entity, and toward that object he has a resembling "mere-knowing, mere-seeing, mere-right-recollection"; and from time to time he stills his mind, and from time to time he diligently cultivates contemplation by way of the higher-wisdom Dharma-insight. This is named settling the mind upon a resembling object (taking the image as object, not the original entity).

—— What is "settling the mind upon the object without error"? It is that the yoga practitioner settles his mind upon the objective field, and in accordance with what is fitting comprehends the object-to-be-known field, thoroughly knowing it as it truly is, without error. This is named settling the mind upon the object without error.

—— What is "being able therein not to relinquish meditative absorption"? It is that the yoga practitioner, thus rightly practicing upon the object, by uninterrupted application and by earnest application, from time to time cultivates the "mark of stopping, the mark of uplifting, and the mark of equanimity"; and by taking cultivation and abundant cultivation as cause and condition, all the coarse-and-heavy states are wholly extinguished, and accordingly he touches-and-realizes the "purity of the basis"; toward the object-to-be-known, because of directly seeing it, he touches-and-realizes the "purity of the object"; because of departing from greed, he touches-and-realizes the "thorough purity of the mind"; because of departing from ignorance (avidyā), he touches-and-realizes the "thorough purity of knowledge." This is named being able therein not to relinquish meditative absorption. Revata! When this monk thus settles his mind upon the objective field, and having thus settled his mind, it is named being well settled.

Upon this the World-Honored One again spoke a verse: "The practitioner practices the various marks, / knows the true meaning of everything, / constantly in the image absorbs in dhyāna, / and attains the realization of thorough purity." —— "The practitioner practices the various marks" states the uninterrupted and earnest practice upon the marks of stopping, uplifting, and equanimity; "knows the true meaning of everything" states the exhaustive extent of the entity; "constantly in the image absorbs in dhyāna" states the image accompanied by discernment and the image without discernment; "attains the realization of thorough purity" states the accomplishment of the task. The World-Honored One again spoke a verse: "Thoroughly knowing the mark of mind, / one can savor the taste of seclusion; / in dhyāna, with constant devoted mindfulness, / one savors joy and bliss, free of defilement." —— "Thoroughly knowing the mark of mind" means that the image accompanied by discernment and the image without discernment are stated under the name "mark of mind," and the exhaustive extent of the entity is stated under the name "thorough knowing"; "one can savor the taste of seclusion" states the delighting-in-severing and delighting-in-cultivating toward the object; "in dhyāna, with constant devoted mindfulness" states the constant diligent cultivation and the devoted-practicing (fine, close, and well-trained) cultivation of tranquillity and insight; "one savors joy and bliss, free of defilement" states the accomplishment of the task. It should be understood that a pervasive object such as this accords with the pure teaching and conforms to right principle. This is named the pervasive object.

Two. The Conduct-Purifying Objects (the Five Mind-Stilling Contemplations)

What is named the conduct-purifying object? It is the differentiation of objects such as the impure, loving-kindness, the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures, element-analysis, and mindfulness of breathing.

(1) The Impure Object — Counters Greed-Conduct

What is the impure object? Stated briefly, there are six kinds of impurity: first, the impurity of rot-and-filth; second, the impurity of suffering-and-distress; third, the impurity of the base-and-inferior; fourth, the impurity of comparison; fifth, the impurity of afflictions; sixth, the impurity of swift-decay.

What is the impurity of rot and filth? This impurity is explained in dependence on two kinds: first, the inner; second, the outer. What is the impurity of rot and filth that rests upon the inner? It is the hair of the head, body hair, nails, teeth, dirt, grime, skin, flesh, bones, skeleton, sinews, vessels, heart, gallbladder, liver, lungs, large intestine, small intestine, raw receptacle, cooked receptacle, belly, stomach, spleen, kidneys, pus, blood, hot phlegm, fat, grease, muscle, marrow, brain, membrane, nasal mucus, spittle, tears, sweat, feces, and urine within this body. Things of those kinds are named the impurity of rot and filth that rests upon the inner. What is the impurity of rot and filth that rests upon the outer? It is lividity, festering and rotting, decomposition, bloating, being devoured, turning crimson, scattering and breaking apart, bones, a chain of bones, bones together with a chain of bones, what is produced by feces, urine, spittle, or nasal mucus, what is smeared with blood or pus, and places fouled by excrement. Things of those kinds are named the impurity of rot and filth that rests upon the outer. The inner and outer kinds are together stated as the single impurity of rot and filth.

What is the impurity of suffering and distress? It is an unbalanced bodily or mental feeling that arises with contact consonant with painful feeling as its condition, and it is included in the aggregate of feeling. This is named the impurity of suffering and distress.

What is the impurity of the base and inferior? It is the most base and inferior entity and the most base and inferior realm, namely, the desire realm. Apart from this, no other realm can be found that is still lower, more inferior, or more utterly vile and filthy. This is named the impurity of the base and inferior.

What is the impurity of comparison? A lesser pure entity, when compared with another, superior pure entity, appears impure. Compared with the superior purity of the formless realm, the dharmas of the form realm appear impure. Compared with nirvāṇa, the cessation of the embodied collection, everything up to the summit of existence appears impure. All cases of those kinds are named the impurity of comparison.

What is the impurity of afflictions? All bonds, fetters, latent proclivities, secondary afflictions, and entanglements throughout the three realms are named the impurity of afflictions.

What is the impurity of swift decay? The five appropriated aggregates are impermanent, not enduring, unreliable, and of a nature that rapidly decays and transforms. This is named the impurity of swift decay.

Why are these six kinds of impurity objects that can purify greed-conduct? Because greed is of five kinds: first, the "desire, craving-for-desire, greed-for-desire" toward the inner body; second, the "sexual desire, sexual greed" toward the outer body; third, object-desire and object-greed; fourth, form-desire and form-greed; fifth, substantialist-view-of-self-desire and substantialist-view-of-self-greed — these are named the five greeds. In order to make these five kinds of desire-greed be severed, dispelled, and no longer active, six kinds of impure objects are established:  By the object of the impurity of rot-and-filth resting upon the inner, the mind is made pure with respect to the desire, craving-for-desire, greed-for-desire toward the inner body.  By the object of the impurity of rot-and-filth resting upon the outer, the mind is made pure with respect to the sexual desire and sexual greed toward the outer body. The greed associated with sexuality is again of four kinds: first, greed for color [complexion]; second, greed for shape; third, greed for exquisite touch; fourth, greed for attendance-and-service. By the four kinds of "outer impure object," the mind is made pure with respect to these four sexual greeds — if one attends to and contemplates the livid-blue, the festering-and-rotten, the transforming-and-decaying, the bloated, and the devoured, the mind is made pure with respect to "greed for color"; if one attends to and contemplates the turned-crimson, the mind is made pure with respect to "greed for shape"; if one attends to and contemplates bones, a chain, and a bone-chain, the mind is made pure with respect to "greed for exquisite touch"; if one attends to and contemplates the scattered-and-broken, the mind is made pure with respect to "greed for attendance-and-service." These four are named making the mind pure with respect to sexual greed.

Therefore the World-Honored One, regarding the various differentiations of "the impurity of rot-and-filth resting upon the outer," established them all in dependence upon the four kinds of "charnel-ground" (the śītavana · the corpse-depositing place):  If it is said "by way of the charnel-ground one sees the corpses, dead one day, two days, up to seven days, devoured by crows, magpies, starving dogs, kites, vultures, foxes, wolves, jackals, and beasts, and one then takes up that mark, likening one's own body to be of just such a nature, of just such a kind, unable to surpass such a dharma-nature" — this displays [everything] from the livid-blue up to the devoured.  If it is said "by way of the charnel-ground one sees the corpses, stripped of skin, flesh, and blood, bound about by sinews and vessels" — this displays the turned-crimson.  If it is said "by way of the charnel-ground one sees the bones, either bones or a chain" — this displays bones, a chain, and a bone-chain.  If it is said "by way of the charnel-ground one sees the bones — hand-bones, foot-bones, hip-bones, knee-bones, arm-bones, elbow-bones, spine-bones, shoulder-bones, rib-bones, the jawbone, the garland of teeth, the crown-skull, and so on, each scattered apart, and after one year, two, three, up to seven years, their color fresh-white like a conch-shell or like the color of a dove, or one sees those bones mixed together with dust and earth" — this displays the scattered-and-broken.

Thus the outer object of the impurity of rot-and-filth makes the mind pure with respect to the four kinds of greed associated with sexuality; by the two objects of the impurity of suffering-and-distress and the impurity of the base-and-inferior, the mind is made pure with respect to the desire-greed "associated with objects"; by the object of the impurity of comparison, the mind is made pure with respect to the desire-greed "associated with form"; by the two objects of the impurity of afflictions and the impurity of swift-decay, the mind is made pure with respect to the desire-greed "toward all the substantialist-views-of-self from the desire-realm up to the summit of existence." This is named the conduct-purifying object of greed-conduct — the above, taking "what can purify greed-conduct," states in sum all the impure objects subsumed under the general remedy. Now in the present meaning, the basic intent takes only "the impurity of rot-and-filth" (the remaining five kinds of impurity are likewise subsumed, respectively, under the remaining conduct-purifying objects).

(2) The Loving-Kindness Object — Counters Hatred-Conduct

What is the loving-kindness object? It is, toward the class of the dear, or the class of the hostile, or the class of the neutral, equally settling in the "intention-of-benefit" (the mind that wishes them to gain benefit), the resolute conviction of the stage of equipoise that can draw forth low, middling, and superior pleasure. It should be understood that here: the three — the class of the dear, the class of the hostile, and the class of the neutral — are the "object"; the intention-of-benefit and the resolute conviction of the stage of equipoise that can draw forth pleasure are the "object-taker"; the object and the object-taker are together abbreviated into one, named the loving-kindness object.

If the sūtra says "the mind conjoined with loving-kindness," this displays the intention-of-benefit toward the object of the three classes — dear, hostile, and neutral. If it says "without enmity, without adversary, without harm," this displays the three marks of the intention-of-benefit: because of being without enmity it is named the dominant intention-of-benefit, and this without-enmity nature is displayed by the two phrases "being without adversary" (not wishing to be mutually opposed and contentious) and "being without harm-and-distress" (not wishing to be un-beneficial). If it says "vast, great, and measureless," this displays the drawing-forth of low, middling, and superior pleasure — the pleasure of the desire-realm is named "vast," the pleasure of the first and second absorption-stages is named "great," and the pleasure of the third absorption-stage is named "measureless." If it says "dwelling complete in resolute conviction pervasively filling," this displays the resolute conviction of the stage of equipoise that can draw forth pleasure; this resolute conviction is precisely the resolute-conviction-attention that co-operates and is subsumed under the dominant intention-of-benefit that can draw forth pleasure. If, toward the sentient beings of the three classes — dear, hostile, and neutral — who are "without suffering and without pleasure," one equally wishes to give them pleasure, it should be understood this is "loving-kindness"; if, toward the sentient beings of the three classes who "have suffering, have pleasure," one equally wishes to remove their suffering and wishes to rejoice in their pleasure, it should be understood this is "compassion, this is sympathetic joy" — suffering sentient beings are the object of compassion, and pleasured sentient beings are the object of sympathetic joy. This is named the loving-kindness object. If there is a person of hatred-conduct who cultivates loving-kindness toward sentient beings, causing hatred to become slight, this is named making the mind pure with respect to hatred.

〔Within the Basic Section, the Śrāvaka Stage, the thirteenth, the second part of the Second Yoga-Station.〕

(3) The Dependent-Origination-of-Conditioned-Natures Object — Counters Delusion-Conduct

What is the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures object? It is that, throughout the three times, there is only coursing, only dharmas, only entities, only causes, only effects, falling into right principle — that is, the principle of dependence, the principle of function, the principle of proving-establishment, and the principle of the way-things-are (the four principles): there are only dharmas able to draw forth dharmas, and there is neither a doer nor a receiver. This is named the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures object. Attending to and contemplating this object, all the delusion-conduct of a person in whom delusion-conduct is dominant becomes slight, and the mind is made pure with respect to the various kinds of delusion-conduct. This is named the dependent-origination-of-conditioned-natures object.

(4) The Element-Analysis Object — Counters Conceit-Conduct

What is the element-analysis object? It is the differentiation of the six elements: first, the earth-element; second, the water-element; third, the fire-element; fourth, the wind-element; fifth, the space-element; sixth, the consciousness-element.

What is the earth-element? The earth-element is of two kinds: first, the inner earth-element; second, the outer earth-element. The inner earth-element is the distinct solidity within this body. It is included in hardness and in earth-as-earth, is attached to the body, and is appropriated. What are its concrete instances? The hair of the head, body hair, nails, teeth, dirt and grime, skin, flesh, skeleton and bones, sinews, vessels, liver, gallbladder, heart, lungs, spleen, kidneys, belly, stomach, large intestine, small intestine, the raw receptacle, the cooked receptacle, and feces and other filth are named the inner earth-element. The outer earth-element is external solidity. It is included in hardness and in earth-as-earth, is not attached to the body, and is not appropriated. What are its concrete instances? Tiles, wood, clods, gravel, trees, stones, mountains, cliffs, and things of those kinds are named the outer earth-element.

What is the water-element? The water-element is of two kinds: first, the inner water-element; second, the outer water-element. The inner water-element is the distinct moisture within this body. It is included in wetness and in water-as-water, is attached to the body, and is appropriated. What are its concrete instances? Tears, sweat, nasal mucus, spittle, fat, grease, oil, marrow, hot phlegm, pus and blood, brain, membrane, urine, and things of those kinds are named the inner water-element. The outer water-element is external moisture. It is included in wetness and in water-as-water, is not attached to the body, and is not appropriated. What are its concrete instances? Wells, springs, pools, marshes, reservoirs, lakes, rivers, seas, and things of those kinds are named the outer water-element.

What is the fire-element? The fire-element is of two kinds: first, the inner fire-element; second, the outer fire-element. The inner fire-element is the distinct warmth within this body. It is included in heat and in warmth-as-warmth, is attached to the body, and is appropriated. What are its concrete instances? All the warmth within the body that makes the body hot, evenly hot, and pervasively hot belongs here. Through that warmth, what is eaten, drunk, chewed, and tasted is properly and readily digested and transformed. When that warmth becomes excessive, it enters the category of steaming heat. Things of those kinds are named the inner fire-element. The outer fire-element is external warmth. It is included in heat and in warmth-as-warmth, is not attached to the body, and is not appropriated. What are its concrete instances? People produce fire by means of a fire drill, powdered cow dung, and the like. Once arisen, that fire can burn cow dung, grass, firewood, thickets, wilderness, mountains, islets, villages or parts of villages, cities or parts of cities, countries or parts of countries, and other things of those kinds. These are named the outer fire-element.

What is the wind-element? The wind-element is of two kinds: first, the inner wind-element; second, the outer wind-element. The inner wind-element is the distinct wind-nature within this body. It is included in blowing movement, has the nature of lightness and motion, is attached to the body, and is appropriated. What are its concrete instances? Within the body there are the upward-coursing wind, the downward-coursing wind, the flank-lying wind, the spine-lying wind, the waist wind, the hip wind, the small-knife wind, the great-knife wind, the needle-pricking wind, the pippala wind, the in-and-out-breath wind, and the wind that follows the limbs and joints. Things of those kinds are named the inner wind-element. The outer wind-element is external wind-nature. It is included in blowing movement, has the nature of lightness and motion, is not attached to the body, and is not appropriated. What are its concrete instances? Outside the body there are winds from the east, west, south, and north; dusty and dustless winds; narrow and vast winds; the vaiśvabhya wind, the vairambhaka wind, and the wind-disc wind. Sometimes a great wind suddenly arises and gathers, breaking trees, toppling walls, collapsing mountains, and churning the sea. After it has blown, having nothing on which to depend, it naturally becomes still. When sentient beings wish to obtain wind, they shake clothing, wave a fan, or wave a palm leaf. Things of those kinds are named the outer wind-element.

What is the space-element? It is the orifices of the eyes, ears, nose, mouth, throat, and the like. Through these one swallows, within these swallowing occurs, and once something has been swallowed, through these orifices it passes downward and is discharged. Things of those kinds are named the space-element.

What is the consciousness-element? It is the eye-, ear-, nose-, tongue-, body-, and mind-consciousnesses, and also the three differentiations of mind, mentation, and consciousness. This is named the consciousness-element.

If a person of conceit-conduct attends to and contemplates the element-analysis, he then departs, within the body, from the "notion of a single whole" (the notion that takes the body as a seamless unity), and gains the "notion of the impure," no longer haughtily lifting himself up, so that his pride-and-conceit becomes slight, and the mind is made pure with respect to the various kinds of conceit-conduct. This is named the conduct-purifying object of a person of conceit-conduct by way of element-analysis.

(5) The Mindfulness-of-Breathing Object — Counters Discursive-Thinking-Conduct

What is the mindfulness-of-breathing object? It is that the mindfulness that takes the in-breath and out-breath as object is named mindfulness of breathing; and the in-and-out-breaths and the like that are this mindfulness's object are named the mindfulness-of-breathing object.

It should be understood that here the in-breath is of two kinds. What are the two? First, the in-breath; second, the intermediate in-breath. What is the in-breath? It is the wind that, without any interval after the out-breath, turns inward through the inner gateway as far as the region of the navel. What is the intermediate in-breath? After the in-breath has ceased and before the out-breath has arisen, at the resting place between them a subtle wind resembling breath arises briefly. This is named the intermediate in-breath.

The out-breath is likewise of two kinds. What are the two? First, the out-breath; second, the intermediate out-breath. Their pattern is like that of the in-breath and intermediate in-breath. The difference is that the out-breath is the wind that, without any interval after the in-breath, turns outward through the outer gateway, beginning at the navel and reaching the face-gate, the tip of the nose, or beyond the body. The intermediate out-breath is the subtle wind that arises briefly at the resting place after the out-breath has ceased and before the in-breath has arisen.

The in- and out-breaths have two causes and conditions. What are the two? First, propelling karma; second, the orifice at the navel or the orifices in the upper part of the body.

The in- and out-breaths have two supports. What are the two? First, the body; second, the mind. Why is this? The breaths turn only in dependence on body and mind, each as is fitting. If breath turned in dependence on the body alone, then beings entering the no-perception concentration or the attainment of cessation, and beings born in the no-perception heaven, ought to breathe; yet breath does not turn in them. If breath turned in dependence on the mind alone, then beings entering a formless concentration or born in the formless realm ought to breathe; yet breath does not turn in them. If mere dependence on body and mind were enough, without each being present as is fitting, then beings entering or born in the fourth absorption, and beings at the embryonic stages of kalala, arbuda, and peśī, ought to breathe; yet breath does not turn in them. Therefore, the in- and out-breaths turn only in dependence on body and mind, each as is fitting.

The in- and out-breaths have two directions of movement. What are the two? First, the in-breath moves downward; second, the out-breath moves upward.

The in- and out-breaths have two kinds of ground. What are the two? First, the coarse orifices; second, the fine orifices. What are the coarse orifices? They extend from the navel orifice to the face-gate and nose-gate, and again from the face-gate and nose-gate to the navel orifice. What are the fine orifices? They are all the pores throughout the body.

The in- and out-breaths have four alternative names. What are the four? First, wind; second, āna-apāna; third, in-breath and out-breath; fourth, body-formation. "Wind" is a name shared with all wind, while the remaining three are names distinctive to the in- and out-breaths.

Cultivating the in- and out-breaths has two faults. What are the two? First, applying the method too slackly; second, applying it too urgently. Applying it too slackly gives rise to indolence, allows dullness and drowsiness to bind and disturb the mind, or makes the mind scatter outward. Applying it too urgently makes either the body or the mind unbalanced. How does it make the body unbalanced? One forcibly holds the in- and out-breaths. Because the breaths are held, an unbalanced wind turns within the body and at first causes all the limbs and joints to tremble; it is therefore called "the trembling-inducing wind." If this trembling wind increases, it can give rise to illness, producing diseases in the limbs and joints. This is how it makes the body unbalanced. How does it make the mind unbalanced? It either causes various forms of distraction or presses the mind with extremely heavy grief and distress. This is how it makes the mind unbalanced.

Again, this mindfulness of breathing should be understood to have, briefly, five kinds of cultivation: first, the cultivation of counting; second, the cultivation of penetrating the aggregates; third, the cultivation of penetrating dependent origination; fourth, the cultivation of penetrating the noble truths; fifth, the cultivation of the sixteen superior practices.

1. The cultivation of counting: briefly, there are four kinds — taking one as one, taking two as one, forward-counting, and reverse-counting.  "Taking one as one, counting": when the in-breath enters, taking the in-and-out-breath as object he settles his mindfulness, and counts it as one; when the in-breath ceases and the out-breath arises and turns outward, he counts it as the second; and thus turning about he counts up to ten (neither abridging nor extending, hence only up to ten).  "Taking two as one, counting": when the in-breath has entered and already ceased, and the out-breath has arisen and already gone out, at that time he combines the two together and counts them as one, counting up to ten — the in-breath and out-breath are named "two," and combining the two together he counts them as one, hence it is named taking two as one.  "Forward-counting": either taking one as one, or taking two as one, in forward sequence turning about he counts up to ten.  "Reverse-counting": that is, from the former two, in reverse sequence he counts from the tenth — nine, eight, seven, six, five, four, three, two, one.  After the practitioner has continuously cultivated the forward and reverse counting and in the interval his mind is without distraction, one further explains for him "advancing counting": counting by combining two into one — if by "taking one as one," then in-and-out-breath, the two combined into one; if by "taking two as one," then in-and-out-breath, the four combined into one; and thus turning about he counts up to ten. Afterward he gradually increases, up to counting by "taking a hundred as one." By this counting that takes a hundred as one, he gradually counts up to ten. Thus one who diligently cultivates mindfulness of counting the breaths goes on to "take ten tens as one" and gradually counts up to a full ten. Through this counting that takes ten as one, his mind is without distraction in the interval — up to this point it is named "having continuously cultivated." If in the interval the mind is distracted, he should withdraw and count again from the beginning (either forward or reverse). Because the counting is extremely continuously practiced, the mind naturally rides the spontaneous course, settling upon the object of the in-and-out-breaths, turning uninterruptedly and without interval in continuity — grasping upon the in-breath, and when the in-breath has ceased grasping upon the "empty position of breath," grasping upon the out-breath, and when the out-breath has ceased grasping upon the empty position of breath, and thus continuously flowing on, unmoving and unshaking, without distracted activity, turning with delight — up to this point it is named "having passed beyond the ground of counting," and he should count no more, but only make the mind settle upon the object of the in-breath and out-breath. With regard to the in- and out-breaths, he should rightly follow them and carefully comprehend them; and he should be well aware of the differentiations of the turning and returning phases among the in-breath, the out-breath, and the two intervals. This is named the cultivation of counting.  Again: for one of dull faculties, one should explain this counting-cultivation of breath-mindfulness; by it he makes the mind settle and delight in a place of distraction; if he did not cultivate counting, his mind would be disturbed by dullness and drowsiness, or would gallop outward and scatter, but by diligently cultivating breath-counting these are all absent. If one is of sharp faculties, of keen and quick understanding, he does not care to ride upon this counting-application (though if it is explained for him he too can swiftly and without error comprehend it, yet he does not delight in it). Having settled his mindfulness upon the object of the in-and-out-breaths, toward "where it turns, up to where it turns, as it turns, and when it turns," in all of this he is able, by settled mindfulness, rightly to accord-and-follow and rightly to comprehend; and if he takes this application, abundantly cultivated, as cause and condition, there arise bodily pliancy and mental pliancy, he realizes one-pointedness, and he enters with delight upon the object.

2. The cultivation of penetrating the aggregates: having well cultivated the counting of breath-mindfulness, he further attends to and contemplates the two matters of "the grasped and the grasper," penetrating the aggregates — attending to and contemplating the in-and-out-breaths and the body upon which the breath depends, he penetrates the form-aggregate; attending to and contemplating the feeling associated with the mindfulness that grasps the breath, he penetrates the feeling-aggregate; attending to and contemplating the "even-comprehending" (image-taking) associated with that mindfulness, he penetrates the perception-aggregate; attending to and contemplating the volition and wisdom and the like associated with that mindfulness, he penetrates the formations-aggregate; attending to and contemplating the minds, mentations, and consciousnesses associated with that mindfulness, he penetrates the consciousness-aggregate. Thus, dwelling much within the aggregates, he is named having penetrated. This is named the cultivation of penetrating the aggregates.

3. The cultivation of penetrating dependent origination: if, without error, he can see and can know that there are only aggregates, only formations, only entities, only dharmas, he can then penetrate dependent origination within the formations. How does he penetrate? The practitioner of contemplation seeks thus: "On what does this in-and-out-breath depend, and on what is it conditioned?" Having sought, he penetrates as it truly is: this in-and-out-breath depends on the body and is conditioned by the body, depends on the mind and is conditioned by the mind. Again he seeks: "On what do this body and mind depend, and on what are they conditioned?" He penetrates: they depend on and are conditioned by the life-faculty. Again he seeks: "On what does the life-faculty depend, and on what is it conditioned?" He penetrates: it depends on and is conditioned by prior action (past karma). Again he seeks: "On what does prior action depend, and on what is it conditioned?" He penetrates: it depends on and is conditioned by ignorance. Thus he understands that ignorance conditions the formations, the formations condition the life-faculty, the life-faculty conditions body-and-mind, and body-and-mind conditions the in-and-out-breaths; and again he understands that because ignorance ceases the formations cease, because the formations cease the life-faculty ceases, because the life-faculty ceases body-and-mind ceases, and because body-and-mind ceases the in-and-out-breaths cease. This is named penetrating dependent origination. Dwelling much in the penetration of dependent origination is named well-practiced cultivation. This is named the cultivation of penetrating dependent origination.

4. The cultivation of penetrating the noble truths: having well cultivated dependent origination, he further, toward the formations, knows as it truly is that they arise from a multitude of conditions, and penetrates impermanence — because the formations are impermanent, they were originally not and yet come to be, and having come to be, disperse and cease; if what was originally not comes to be, and having come to be disperses and ceases, then it is a dharma of birth, a dharma of aging, a dharma of sickness, a dharma of death; if it is a dharma of birth, aging, sickness, and death, then it is suffering; if it is suffering, then it is no-self, not gaining mastery, remote from any sovereign-master. Thus, by the practice of impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and no-self, he penetrates the truth of suffering. Again he rightly penetrates that all the conditioned formations, arising from a multitude of conditions, are of a nature that is suffering, like a disease, like a boil, all having craving as their condition; and he penetrates that if this craving that gives rise to the multitude of sufferings is severed without remainder, this is the ultimate stillness and subtlety — "if toward this I thus understand, contemplate-and-see, and dwell much, I shall be able to sever craving without remainder." Thus he penetrates the truth of origination, the truth of cessation, and the truth of the path. Dwelling much in this penetration, he then realizes direct-comprehension within the truths. This is named the cultivation of penetrating the noble truths.

5. The cultivation of the sixteen superior practices: having well cultivated within the noble truths, all the afflictions to be severed by the path-of-seeing are wholly and permanently severed, and only the afflictions to be severed by the path-of-cultivation remain; in order to sever those, he further advances in the cultivation of the "sixteen superior practices." What are the sixteen superior practices?  (1) With respect to a mindful in-breath, "I now can train in breathing in mindfully"; with respect to a mindful out-breath, "I now can train in breathing out mindfully."  (2) Whether the breath is long or short.  (3) With respect to an in-breath that is aware of the whole body, "I now can train in breathing in while aware of the whole body"; with respect to an out-breath that is aware of the whole body, "I now can train in breathing out while aware of the whole body."  (4) With respect to an in-breath that stills the body-formation, "I now can train in breathing in while stilling the body-formation"; with respect to an out-breath that stills the body-formation, "I now can train in breathing out while stilling the body-formation."  (5) With respect to an in-breath that is aware of joy, "I now can train in breathing in while aware of joy"; with respect to an out-breath that is aware of joy, "I now can train in breathing out while aware of joy."  (6) With respect to an in-breath that is aware of bliss, "I now can train in breathing in while aware of bliss"; with respect to an out-breath that is aware of bliss, "I now can train in breathing out while aware of bliss."  (7) With respect to an in-breath that is aware of the mind-formation, "I now can train in breathing in while aware of the mind-formation"; with respect to an out-breath that is aware of the mind-formation, "I now can train in breathing out while aware of the mind-formation."  (8) With respect to an in-breath that stills the mind-formation, "I now can train in breathing in while stilling the mind-formation"; with respect to an out-breath that stills the mind-formation, "I now can train in breathing out while stilling the mind-formation."  (9) With respect to an in-breath that is aware of the mind, "I now can train in breathing in while aware of the mind"; with respect to an out-breath that is aware of the mind, "I now can train in breathing out while aware of the mind."  (10) With respect to an in-breath that gladdens the mind, "I now can train in breathing in while gladdening the mind"; with respect to an out-breath that gladdens the mind, "I now can train in breathing out while gladdening the mind."  (11) With respect to an in-breath that restrains and holds the mind, "I now can train in breathing in while restraining and holding the mind"; with respect to an out-breath that restrains and holds the mind, "I now can train in breathing out while restraining and holding the mind."  (12) With respect to an in-breath that liberates the mind, "I now can train in breathing in while liberating the mind"; with respect to an out-breath that liberates the mind, "I now can train in breathing out while liberating the mind."  (13) With respect to an in-breath that contemplates impermanence, "I now can train in breathing in while contemplating impermanence"; with respect to an out-breath that contemplates impermanence, "I now can train in breathing out while contemplating impermanence."  (14) With respect to an in-breath that contemplates severance, "I now can train in breathing in while contemplating severance"; with respect to an out-breath that contemplates severance, "I now can train in breathing out while contemplating severance."  (15) With respect to an in-breath that contemplates dispassion, "I now can train in breathing in while contemplating dispassion"; with respect to an out-breath that contemplates dispassion, "I now can train in breathing out while contemplating dispassion."  (16) With respect to an in-breath that contemplates cessation, "I now can train in breathing in while contemplating cessation"; with respect to an out-breath that contemplates cessation, "I now can train in breathing out while contemplating cessation."

Question: How are the differentiations of these sixteen stated? Answer:  One in training who has seen the trace (has entered the path-of-seeing) has already gained the four foundations of mindfulness and the rest, and toward the object of the in-and-out-breaths further advances in cultivating attention, in order to sever the remaining fetters, hence being mindful "being mindful of the in-breath / being mindful of the out-breath" 〔the first〕. When taking the in-and-out-breath field as object he is mindful "being mindful of the long in-breath, out-breath"; when taking the intermediate in-and-out-breath field as object he is mindful "being mindful of the short," and comprehends the length and shortness just as they are — this is named "whether long or short" 〔the second〕. If, taking as object the fine orifices within the body and the in-and-out-breaths pervasively entering along all the pores, he gives rise to resolute conviction, he is then mindful "being aware of the whole-body in-breath, out-breath" 〔the third〕. If the in-breath (and the intermediate in-breath) has ceased and the out-breath (and the intermediate out-breath) has not yet arisen, taking as object the empty-and-nonexistent position, the remote position of the in-and-out-breath; or if the out-breath has ceased and the in-breath has not yet arisen, taking as object its empty-and-nonexistent position, its remote position 〔for these two phrases the base text reads "the out-breath… the in-breath has not yet arisen"; in the Sheng edition the two characters "out / in" are interchanged (0432c15) — the base text follows the Taishō reading, and the Sheng edition's variant reading is also recorded〕 — he is then mindful "stilling the body-formation on the in-breath, out-breath"; and moreover, because of abundant cultivation, the rigid painful contact that formerly, when not yet continuously practiced, turned along [with the breath] is now, being continuously practiced, wholly stilled, and a soft, blissful contact turns along, so that he is mindful "stilling the body-formation" 〔the fourth〕.  Again, the diligent cultivator, when he gains the first absorption or the second absorption, is then mindful "being aware of joy on the in-breath, out-breath" 〔the fifth〕; when he gains the joy-free third absorption, he is mindful "being aware of bliss" 〔the sixth〕. Above the third absorption there is no principle of further cultivating application within mindfulness of breathing, hence up to the third absorption it is stated as subsumed under the application of breath-mindfulness. Again, one who is aware of joy and aware of bliss may momentarily give rise to forgetfulness of mindfulness — either supposing there is a self and what belongs to a self, or giving rise to the conceit "I am," or supposing "I shall exist / shall not exist / shall have form / shall be formless / shall have perception / shall be without perception / shall be neither with perception nor without perception," giving rise to these deluded notions-and-thoughts and their co-operating stirring-conceit, conceptual proliferation, fabrication, and craving; as soon as they arise, he can swiftly penetrate them with wisdom, not becoming deeply defiled-and-attached, and by skillful means severs, dispels, and expels them — by this application he is then mindful "being aware of the mind-formation on the in-breath, out-breath" 〔the seventh〕, "stilling the mind-formation" 〔the eighth〕.  Again, if he gains the fundamental first, second, or third absorption (or the access-concentration, the threshold-concentration, of the first absorption he has gained), in dependence upon this he examines the mind that has arisen: knowing it as it truly is and being aware of it as it truly is — whether a mind with greed / a mind free of greed, a mind with hatred / a mind free of hatred, a mind with delusion / a mind free of delusion, a contracted mind / a scattered mind, a lowered mind / an uplifted mind, a mind with excitement / a mind without excitement, a stilled mind / an unstilled mind, a mind in equipoise / a mind not in equipoise, a well-cultivated mind / a poorly-cultivated mind, a well-liberated mind / a poorly-liberated mind — all as they truly are, hence being mindful "being aware of the mind on the in-breath, out-breath" 〔the ninth〕. If he sees dullness-and-drowsiness covering-and-obstructing his mind, because he is dwelling too much inwardly in tranquil-stopping, he then, toward some pure and sublime object outward, displays, instructs, exhorts, and gladdens, rousing his mind, hence being mindful "gladdening the mind" 〔the tenth〕. If he sees excitement-and-regret covering-and-obstructing his mind, because he is dwelling too much outwardly in clamorous-uplifting, he then settles inwardly in stillness and restrains-and-holds his mind, hence being mindful "restraining-and-holding the mind" 〔the eleventh〕. If, because his mind is well-cultivated, he makes the actively-operating hindrances all become remote, and within the various hindrances the mind is made pure, hence being mindful "liberating the mind" 〔the twelfth〕.  His mind having been liberated from the hindrances, remaining latent proclivities should be severed; in order to sever them he brings the path before him, and toward the impermanent dharma-nature of the formations he examines with utmost goodness, earnestness, and accord with principle, hence being mindful "contemplating impermanence" 〔the thirteenth〕. Moreover, he, having formerly, in dependence on the lower three absorptions or the threshold-concentration, cultivated the yogic practice of tranquillity, now, in dependence on the contemplation of impermanence, again cultivates the yogic practice of insight; and having thus perfumed-and-cultivated the mind with tranquillity and insight, he seeks liberation from the latent proclivities within the various elements. What various elements? Namely, the three elements: first, the element of severance (the severing of all formations to be severed by the path-of-seeing); second, the element of dispassion (the severing of all formations to be severed by the path-of-cultivation); third, the element of cessation (the cessation of all bases). Contemplating these three elements as stilled, secure, and free of trouble, he cultivates tranquillity and insight; and because of abundant cultivation, his mind is liberated from the remaining afflictions to be severed by the path-of-cultivation, hence being mindful "contemplating severance, contemplating dispassion, contemplating cessation on the in-breath, out-breath" 〔the fourteenth, fifteenth, sixteenth〕. Thus, because all the afflictions to be severed by the path-of-seeing and the path-of-cultivation are permanently severed, he becomes an arhat, with the outflows permanently exhausted; thereafter there is nothing further to be done, and toward what is to be ascertained he has reached the ultimate. This is named the sixteen superior practices.

Cultivating in this way is named the five kinds of cultivation of mindfulness of breathing. A person of much-discursive-thinking-conduct should rightly and diligently train herein and delight in mastering it; one who, toward the object, has anxious preoccupation and distraction should individually and inwardly draw near to this contemplation. If one diligently cultivates herein, discursive-thinking and agitation are wholly absent, and the mind settles swiftly upon the object, giving rise to deep delight — this is named the conduct-purifying object of the fifth, "a person of much-discursive-thinking-conduct."

Thus, in sum, this is named the conduct-purifying object.

義疏Exposition

教學弧:前段把「人」認清了——二十八種補特伽羅、五種行性。這段就為他們配藥。論先給一帖「人人都用」的通用所緣(遍滿所緣的四種影像,其實就是一張止觀地圖),再給「對病下藥」的五停心觀:不淨治貪、慈愍治瞋、緣性緣起治癡、界差別治慢、數息治尋思。眼,是兩處:一是緣起該怎麼「想」才如理的四道理,一是數息修到末了的十六勝行=四念住——這把聲聞地的觀行,接到了下文的三十七菩提分。

先有一帖通用所緣:遍滿所緣,其實是一張止觀地圖

講五停心之前,論先立「遍滿所緣」——所謂遍滿,就是不論修哪一種觀,都通用、都遍行的所緣。它有四樣,連起來看,正是一條從止觀到轉依的路:

有分別影像——你聽法、受教之後,心裡浮起一個『所知事的同分影像』(不是當前的真實境,是定心中相似顯現的那個像),就拿毗鉢舍那(觀)去觀察、簡擇、尋思。這是「觀品」。 無分別影像——觀夠了,取住那影像相,不再簡擇,只用奢摩他(止)寂靜其心,以九種行相令心安住(內住、等住、安住、近住、調伏、寂靜、最極寂靜、一趣、等持)。這是「止品」,也就是九住心。 事邊際性——把所緣的「量」和「性」都摸到邊:盡所有性(一切色不出色蘊、一切法不出界處、一切所知不出四諦),如所有性(事相的真如本性,由四道理而具道理性)。 所作成辦——止觀修熟,作意圓滿,便得「轉依」,麁重息滅;此時「超過影像」,直接對所知事生起無分別的現量智見——不再隔著影像看,而是現量親見。

古德拿「瓶口出物」打了個比方:定境(那個影像)能生定心、相續入定,就像瓶口出水、像食物依口入腹,所以這影像又叫「三摩地口、三摩地門」(景·泰)。論還附了一段《頡隸伐多經》——長老頡隸伐多問佛『比丘怎麼把心安在所緣上?』佛答的四句裡,第一句「於相稱緣安住其心」,就直接引出了下面的五停心。

對病下藥:五停心觀

「相稱緣」三個字是這一整段的鑰匙:藥要對病。前段說一個人或貪、或瞋、或癡、或慢、或尋思偏盛;這段就一帖一帖對著開(遁倫)——

不淨治貪。論列六種不淨(朽穢/苦惱/下劣/觀待/煩惱/速壞),最吃重的是「朽穢不淨」:依內,就觀自己這身子裡髮毛爪齒、皮肉筋骨、心肝脾腎、膿血屎尿三十多樣不淨之物;依外,就到「憺怕路」(屍陀林、停屍處)去觀屍體的變化——死經一兩天到七天,被烏鵲、餓狗、鵄鷲、狐狼食噉(青瘀、膿爛、膖脹、食噉),再到離皮肉血只剩筋脈纏裹(變赤),再到骨、鎖、骨鎖,最後手骨足骨各各分散、「其色鮮白猶如螺貝、或如鴿色」(散壞)。取這屍相,回照自身「亦如是性、不能超過如是法性」。貪有五種(內身欲、外身婬、境、色、薩迦耶),其中婬貪又分顯色/形色/妙觸/承事四種,論一一配上對治的屍相。(古德順帶辨了「變赤」小乘大乘解法不同,又指出婬貪的第四「承事貪」論裡只列名、沒另立治法(遁倫)——這些並錄,不判。)「憺怕」二字,古德還點出雙關:既是停屍處的寂寞無人,也是涅槃的寂靜——作不淨觀正是通向那寂靜的「路」。

慈愍治瞋。對親、怨、中三種人,平等安住「願他得益」之心,引生下中上品的快樂定地勝解(欲界樂名廣、初二靜慮樂名大、三靜慮樂名無量)。對無苦無樂者願與其樂是「慈」,對有苦者願拔苦、對有樂者願慶樂是「悲、喜」。瞋行人這樣修,瞋便微薄。

緣性緣起治癡——這裡是全段的義理眼之一。癡,是把因緣看顛倒;對治就是「如理地觀緣起」。可是緣起該怎麼「想」才不走樣?論給了一把尺——四道理(遁倫): 觀待道理:行是「觀待」無明才有的(待緣而生,不是自己冒出來的)。 作用道理:無明只有「生起行」這個作用,各支各有各的別別作用,沒有一個多餘的作者在背後使喚。 證成道理:用三量去證——至教量(佛說的緣起、苦集)、現量(定中親見的苦無常智)、比量(對辯者以理推驗)。 法爾道理:有佛無佛,「無明緣行」其性本爾、法性如此,不由作者、也不由受者。  一句話收束:「唯有諸法能引諸法,無有作者及受者。」癡行人這樣思惟,癡便微薄。(這四道理,遁倫在卷七逐句講透了;窺基在這裡卻只點一句「緣性是四緣、緣起是十二因緣」,沒展開四道理——並錄此別。)

界差別治慢。把身體拆成六界——地、水、火、風、空、識,每一界各有內、外(內地界=身中堅性如骨齒,外地界=瓦石山巖……)。慢,根子在把這六界湊成的身子當作「一合之我」而高舉;界差別觀就是要「離一合相」——身不過是六界假合,哪有一個渾然的「我」可慢?古德指出,這正是《般若經》「如來說一合相」的意思(窺基)。

阿那波那念(數息)治尋思。尋思行人心思飄散,就用數呼吸把心收住。論講得極細:入出息的二因緣、二所依、二行、二地、四異名、兩種過患(太緩生惛沈、太急傷身心),然後是五種修習——算數(以一為一、以二為一、順、逆、勝進,數到心任運安住、過了「算數地」就不必再數)、悟入諸蘊(從息與身心悟入五蘊)、悟入緣起(順逆推息←身心←命根←先行←無明)、悟入聖諦(由無常苦空無我入四諦現觀)、最後是十六勝行。(古德順帶說,藏傳把它分成數、隨、止、觀、還、淨六門,這裡立五門,開合不同,並錄。)

數息修到末了:十六勝行就是四念住

十六勝行是見道之後、為斷餘結的進修,所以叫「勝行」(勝過見道前的功夫)。它的妙處,古來一致地用「四念住」四四配來看(遁倫·窺基):

  • 觀息長、觀息短、覺了遍身、息除身行——這四是觀身;(其中「息除身行」一句寫「緣出息、入息空無位」,底本作「出…入」,聖語藏本「出/入」二字互易——一字之易不改觀法,異讀並錄於〈考據〉。)
  • 覺了喜、覺了樂、覺了心行、息除心行——這四是觀受
  • 覺了心、喜悅心、制持心、解脫心——這四是觀心
  • 無常隨觀、斷隨觀、離欲隨觀、滅隨觀——這四是觀法

一條呼吸的觀照,從覺知息的長短遍身,到隨息歷四禪覺喜覺樂、調伏心行,到觀心的種種(有貪離貪、惛沈掉舉、解脫不解脫),到末後緣三界(斷界、離欲界、滅界)作無常、斷、離欲、滅四種隨觀,「於見、修所斷一切煩惱皆永斷,成阿羅漢」。一口氣,便是身受心法四念住的全程。

所以這一子看似在講「所緣」,其實已經把聲聞觀行的兩個關節點立起來了:一是緣起怎麼如理觀(四道理),一是呼吸怎麼觀成四念住(十六勝行)。前段認清了人,這段配齊了藥;而這帖藥裡的「四念住」,正要接上下一子(13-02-04 瑜伽修)的三十七菩提分——一條從調伏一念呼吸、到三十七道品的路,就此鋪開了。

承衍

所緣一子上承「人」、下啟「修」。承前:前子立二十八人、五行相(貪瞋癡慢尋思)為「機」,本子五停心(不淨/慈愍/緣性緣起/界差別/阿那波那念)即逐一對治之「藥」——《頡隸伐多經》「於相稱緣安住其心」明標藥病相稱,先立人、後對治,二子一貫(13-02-01 補特伽羅)。啟後三脈:其一,緣性緣起所緣的四道理(觀待/作用/證成/法爾),後於思所成地廣明,本子已立其於十二緣起正觀之用(地11 思所成地);其二,遍滿無分別影像的九住心、止舉捨相與轉依,與三摩呬多地互讀(地06);其三,阿那波那念末後的十六勝行已四念住四四配(觀身受心法),正啟下一子瑜伽修的三十七菩提分——四念住為其首(13-02-04)。一帖對治的所緣,前接補特伽羅之機,後通菩提分之修,是第二瑜伽處由「人」轉「法」的接榫。

Teaching arc: the prior unit sized up the "person" — the twenty-eight kinds of person, the five modes of temperament. This unit compounds the medicine for them. The treatise first hands over a "for everyone" universal object (the four images of the pervasive object, which are in fact a single map of tranquillity-and-insight), and then hands over the "medicine matched to the sickness" of the five settling-of-mind contemplations: the impure to treat greed, loving-kindness to treat hatred, the object-nature and dependent origination to treat delusion, the differentiation of elements to treat conceit, and the counting of breaths to treat discursive thought. The two points of the eye: one is the four principles by which dependent origination must be "contemplated" if it is to be contemplated aright; the other is the sixteen excellent practices = the four foundations of mindfulness to which the counting of breaths comes at its end — this joins the śrāvaka's contemplative practice onto the thirty-seven factors of awakening in the following text.

First a Universal Object: The Pervasive Object Is in Fact a Map of Tranquillity-and-Insight

Before speaking of the five settling-of-mind contemplations, the treatise first sets up the "pervasive object" — pervasive meaning the object that, whichever contemplation one cultivates, is held in common and pervasively active. It has four items, and taken together they are precisely a single road from tranquillity-and-insight to the transformation of the basis:

The image endowed with discernment — after you have heard the Dharma and received the teaching, there arises in the mind an "image concordant with the object known" (not the actual present object, but that likeness-image which appears within the concentrated mind), and you take up vipaśyanā (insight) to contemplate it, to sort and select, to investigate it. This is the "insight class."

The image devoid of discernment — when you have contemplated enough, you take up and rest in that image-mark, no longer sorting and selecting, and use śamatha (tranquillity) alone to still the mind, causing the mind to abide by the nine modes of activity (inward abiding, even abiding, settled abiding, close abiding, taming, stilling, utmost stilling, one-directedness, and equipoise). This is the "tranquillity class" — that is, the nine abidings of the mind.

The limit of the object — you touch the very edge of both the "measure" and the "nature" of the object: the exhaustive-nature (all form does not exceed the aggregate of form; all dharmas do not exceed the elements and the sense-fields; all that is known does not exceed the four truths), and the such-as-it-is-nature (the true suchness that is the nature of the object-appearance, possessed of the principled character by way of the four principles).

The consummation of what is to be done — when tranquillity and insight have been cultivated to maturity and attention is perfected, one gains the "transformation of the basis," and coarse heaviness comes to rest; at this moment one "surpasses the image" and gives rise directly, toward the object known, to a non-conceptual direct-perceptual knowledge and vision — no longer seeing across an image, but directly and personally seeing by direct perception.

The ancient masters took the simile of "a thing coming out of the mouth of a jar": the concentrative object (that image) can generate the concentrated mind and, in continuous succession, enter concentration — just as water comes out of the mouth of a jar, just as food enters the belly by way of the mouth; and so this image is also called "the mouth of samādhi, the gate of samādhi" 〔Jing · Tai〕. The treatise also appends a passage of the Revata Sūtra — the elder Revata asks the Buddha, "How does a monk rest the mind upon the object?"; and of the four lines the Buddha answers, the first, "rest the mind upon a concordant object," leads straight into the five settling-of-mind contemplations below.

Medicine Matched to the Sickness: The Five Settling-of-Mind Contemplations

The three words "a concordant object" are the key to this whole passage: the medicine must match the sickness. The prior unit said that a person may be predominantly given to greed, or to hatred, or to delusion, or to conceit, or to discursive thought; this unit prescribes for each in turn 〔Dunlun〕—

The impure treats greed. The treatise lists six kinds of the impure (the rotting-and-foul / the suffering-and-distressing / the low-and-mean / the relative / the affliction-bound / the swiftly-perishing), and the one that carries the most weight is the "rotting-and-foul impure": inwardly, one contemplates the more-than-thirty impure things within this body of one's own — hair, body-hair, nail, tooth, skin, flesh, sinew, bone, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, pus, blood, dung, urine; outwardly, one goes to the "charnel road" (the cool grove, the corpse-depositing place) to contemplate the changes of a corpse — dead now one or two days on to seven days, devoured by crows and magpies, hungry dogs, kites and vultures, foxes and wolves (livid-blue, festering, bloated, devoured); then on to where, with skin, flesh, and blood gone, only the sinews bind it together (turned red); then on to the bones, the fettered-bones, the bone-chain; and at last where the hand-bones and foot-bones lie each scattered apart, "their color fresh and white as a conch-shell, or like the color of a dove" (scattered-and-destroyed). Taking up this corpse-mark, one turns it back upon one's own body — "of just this same nature, and unable to surpass just this dharma-nature." Greed is of five kinds (greed for the inner body, licentious greed for the outer body, for the object, for form, for the identity-view), and licentious greed is further divided into four — color, shape, fine touch, and being-waited-upon; the treatise matches each with its antidote corpse-mark. (The ancient masters note in passing that "turned red" is glossed differently by the Lesser Vehicle and the Great Vehicle, and point out that for the fourth of the licentious greeds, "greed for being-waited-upon," the treatise lists only the name and sets up no separate antidote 〔Dunlun〕 — these are recorded side by side, not adjudicated.) For the two words "charnel-road," the ancient masters also point out a double sense: it is both the desolate, unpeopled corpse-depositing place, and the stilling of nirvāṇa — to perform the contemplation of the impure is precisely the "road" that leads toward that stilling.

Loving-kindness treats hatred. Toward the three kinds of person — dear, hostile, and neutral — one rests equally in the mind that "wishes them to gain benefit," giving rise to the resolute conviction of a joyous concentrative ground of the lesser, middling, and superior grades (the bliss of the desire-realm is called "vast," the bliss of the first two absorptions "great," the bliss of the third absorption "measureless"). To wish to give bliss to one who is without suffering and without bliss is "loving-kindness"; to wish to draw out suffering from one who suffers, and to wish to rejoice at one who has bliss, are "compassion and sympathetic joy." When one of hateful temperament cultivates in this way, hatred grows thin.

The object-nature and dependent origination treat delusion — here is one of the doctrinal points of the eye of the whole passage. Delusion is to see cause-and-condition upside down; the antidote is to "contemplate dependent origination in accord with principle." But how must dependent origination be "thought" if it is not to go astray? The treatise gives a ruler — the four principles 〔Dunlun〕: The principle of dependence-and-attendance: the formations are what come to be only in dependence upon and attendance on ignorance (avidyā) (they arise attending on a condition, they do not spring up of themselves). The principle of activity: ignorance has only the one activity of "giving rise to the formations," and each limb has its own several activity; there is no superfluous agent behind them driving them on. The principle of establishing-proof: one proves by the three means of knowledge — the means of authoritative teaching (the dependent origination, the suffering and its origin, that the Buddha spoke), direct perception (the knowledge of suffering and impermanence personally seen within concentration), and inference (verifying by reasoning against a disputant). The principle of the very-way-things-are: whether a buddha appears or not, "ignorance conditions the formations" — its nature is thus of itself, the dharma-nature is just so, not by an agent, and not by an experiencer. One phrase draws it to a close: "There are only dharmas that draw forth dharmas; there is no agent and no experiencer." When one of deluded temperament reflects in this way, delusion grows thin. (These four principles Dunlun expounds through, line by line, in fascicle seven; but Kuiji here notes only the single line "the object-nature is the four conditions, dependent origination is the twelvefold causation," and does not unfold the four principles — this divergence is recorded side by side.)

The differentiation of elements treats conceit. One takes the body apart into six elements — earth, water, fire, wind, space, and consciousness — and each element has its inner and outer (the inner earth-element = the solid nature within the body, such as bone and tooth; the outer earth-element = tile, stone, mountain, cliff …). Conceit is rooted in taking this body, assembled out of the six elements, as "a single unified self" and exalting it; the contemplation of the differentiation of elements is precisely to "part from the mark of the single unified" — the body is nothing but the six elements provisionally combined; where is there a single seamless "self" to be conceited about? The ancient masters point out that this is precisely the meaning of the Prajñāpāramitā's "the Tathāgata speaks of a single unified mark" 〔Kuiji〕.

Mindfulness of breathing (the counting of breaths) treats discursive thought. One of discursive temperament, his thoughts drifting and scattering, uses the counting of the breath to gather the mind in. The treatise expounds it in the finest detail: the two causal conditions of the in-and-out breath, the two supports, the two courses, the two grounds, the four alternative names, the two faults (too slack breeds torpor, too tense injures body and mind), and then the five cultivations — counting (taking one as one, taking two as one, in forward order, in reverse order, and advancing-onward, counting until the mind abides spontaneously and, having passed the "ground of counting," need count no more), penetrating the aggregates (penetrating the five aggregates from breath and body-and-mind), penetrating dependent origination (tracing forward and back: breath ← body-and-mind ← the life-faculty ← prior formations ← ignorance), penetrating the noble truths (entering the direct realization of the four truths by way of impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and no-self), and at last the sixteen excellent practices. (The ancient masters note in passing that the Tibetan transmission divides it into the six gates of counting, following, resting, contemplating, returning, and purifying, while here five gates are set up — the merging and dividing differing — recorded side by side.)

The Counting of Breaths at Its End: The Sixteen Excellent Practices Are the Four Foundations of Mindfulness

The sixteen excellent practices are the further cultivation, after the path of seeing, for severing the remaining fetters, and so are called "excellent practices" (excelling the work before the path of seeing). Their marvel has, since ancient times, been consistently seen by matching them four-by-four to the "four foundations of mindfulness" 〔Dunlun · Kuiji〕:

  • Contemplating the breath long, contemplating the breath short, being aware of the whole body, and stilling the bodily formation — these four are contemplation of the body; (of these, the line "stilling the bodily formation" reads "taking as object the state of emptiness of the out-breath and the in-breath"; the base text reads "out … in," while the Sheng-canon text transposes the two words "out / in" — a single-word change that does not alter the contemplation-method; the variant reading is recorded side by side in the ⟨Apparatus⟩.)
  • Being aware of joy, being aware of bliss, being aware of the mental formation, and stilling the mental formation — these four are contemplation of feeling;
  • Being aware of the mind, gladdening the mind, restraining-and-holding the mind, and liberating the mind — these four are contemplation of the mind;
  • The contemplation attendant on impermanence, the contemplation attendant on severance, the contemplation attendant on the fading of desire, and the contemplation attendant on cessation — these four are contemplation of dharmas.

The contemplation carried along a single breath — from the awareness of the breath's length-and-shortness and its pervading the body, to attending on the breath through the four absorptions and being aware of joy and bliss and taming the mental formation, to the various contemplations of the mind (with greed and parted from greed, torpor and agitation, liberated and not liberated), and at the last, taking the three elements as object (the element of severance, the element of the fading of desire, the element of cessation) and performing the four contemplations attendant on impermanence, severance, the fading of desire, and cessation — "all the afflictions to be severed on the paths of seeing and of cultivation are severed forever, and one becomes an arhat." A single breath, and it is the whole course of the four foundations of mindfulness of body, feeling, mind, and dharmas.

So this one unit, which looks as though it is expounding "objects," has in fact already erected the two crux-points of the śrāvaka's contemplative practice: one is how dependent origination is to be contemplated in accord with principle (the four principles), the other is how the breath is to be contemplated into the four foundations of mindfulness (the sixteen excellent practices). The prior unit made the person clear; this unit compounds the full complement of medicine; and within this medicine, the "four foundations of mindfulness" is precisely what joins onto the thirty-seven factors of awakening in the next unit (13-02-04, the Cultivation of Yoga) — a road that runs from the taming of a single thought-breath to the thirty-seven aids of the path is thereby laid out.

Carrying Forward

The object-unit receives "the person" above and opens onto "cultivation" below. Receiving what precedes: the prior unit set up the twenty-eight persons and the five modes (greed, hatred, delusion, conceit, discursive thought) as the "faculty"; this unit's five settling-of-mind contemplations (the impure / loving-kindness / the object-nature and dependent origination / the differentiation of elements / mindfulness of breathing) are the "medicine" that treats each one in turn — the Revata Sūtra's "rest the mind upon a concordant object" plainly signals that medicine and sickness must be matched, first setting up the person and then treating it, the two units of a single piece (13-02-01, the Persons). Opening onto what follows, three veins: first, the four principles of the object-nature-and-dependent-origination object (dependence-and-attendance / activity / establishing-proof / the very-way-things-are) are amply set forth later in the Stage of What is Attained through Reflection, and this unit has already established their use in the right contemplation of the twelvefold dependent origination (Stage 11, the Stage of What is Attained through Reflection); second, the nine abidings of the mind of the pervasive image devoid of discernment, together with the marks of stilling, exerting, and equanimity, and the transformation of the basis, are to be read together with the Stage of Meditative Equipoise (Stage 6); third, the sixteen excellent practices at the end of mindfulness of breathing have already been matched four-by-four to the four foundations of mindfulness (contemplation of body, feeling, mind, and dharmas), and precisely open onto the thirty-seven factors of awakening of the next unit's Cultivation of Yoga — the four foundations of mindfulness being their head (13-02-04). A single object of treatment, receiving before it the faculty of the persons and opening after it onto the cultivation of the factors of awakening, is the joint at which the second yoga-station turns from "the person" to "the dharma."

考據Apparatus

本子古德雙詳遁倫《論記》卷六之下→卷七之上〔T42 0444b14–0449c19〕(遍滿四影像·頡隸伐多經框架·五停心逐門·緣性緣起四道理·十六勝行四念住配·並引景·泰·基·備·遠公·三藏);窺基《略纂》卷八〔T43 0113b04–0114c25〕(四影像·四清淨·五貪·青瘀變赤·憺怕路·六界·阿那波那·十六勝行四念住配;於慈愍·緣性緣起四道理·頡隸伐多 闕釋)。最勝子《釋》無逐句專釋。


一、科判定位

科判系統此段之位
玄奘 T1579 本地分十七地第十三聲聞地·第二瑜伽處·之一末–之二·第三目所緣之前二:遍滿所緣(四影像·頡隸伐多經)+淨行所緣(五停心:不淨/慈愍/緣性緣起/界差別/阿那波那念)〔T30 0427a22–0433b29·善巧所緣 0433c01 前訖〕
論文自身所緣開四章(遍滿·淨行·善巧·淨惑)。遍滿四影像=有分別影像(觀品)·無分別影像(止品·九住心)·事邊際性(盡所有/如所有·四道理)·所作成辦(轉依·超過影像·現量智見);淨行五停心對五行(貪瞋癡慢尋思);阿那波那念五修習(算數·悟入諸蘊·緣起·聖諦·十六勝行)
遁倫《論記》「第三所緣中,初開四章」「淨行所緣…先列五門則是五度觀門」「此卷自來但解前二〔不淨·慈愍〕」〔T42 0444b14·0446a08·0446a10〕
窺基《略纂》卷八抄·「論解有分別、無分別影像等中,如《對法》第十一抄會」起〔T43 0113b04〕

二、異譯·經內平行對勘

  • 異譯:真諦《十七地論》漢傳僅卷1–3,不涵卷26–27,漢無傳本(佚)·從闕
  • 論本所引經(經據·非異譯)《頡隸伐多經》——論本長老頡隸伐多問世尊「於緣安住其心」一段〔T30 0427c–0428c〕為遍滿所緣之經證;遁倫釋經主名「頡隸伐多,此云遇時,獲生佛世故」〔T42 0445b16〕。
  • 經內平行(攝決擇):攝決擇分聲聞地〔T30 0669b 起〕。
  • 藏論五門對勘(遁倫·唯錄):阿那波那念,「若准藏論等有六,謂數、隨、止、觀、還、淨也。今此初門〔算數〕當彼數也,餘門不同」〔T42 0448a10〕——今論立五種修習(算數·悟入諸蘊·緣起·聖諦·十六勝行),與藏傳六門開合不同,唯錄。
  • 校勘:本段(0427a22–0433b29)大正原書校記全枚舉見目二(附)(<app> 逐條校勘元素雖 0,原書校記以註記形式收錄——「校勘元素零」不等於「無校記」)。古德別引《對法》《正理》《婆沙》《般若》《智論》,見目四,唯錄。

(附) 校勘(大正原書校記全枚舉)

本段(0427a22–0433b29)大正原書校記共 33 條藏本異讀;另有大正編者原註 3 條(卷末題記/麗本空白類,不採,另列)。底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印);本段無一條升定本案(無古德牒文+義理雙證支持異讀者),異讀並錄備考:

註號底本【大】異讀語境
04270010427b01簡*揀【元】【明】*有分別影像·簡擇
04270020427b07止【聖】聽聞正法(正/止)
04270030427c09地【元】頡隸伐多·奢摩他
04270040427c29比丘*苾芻【宋】*【元】*【明】*頡隸伐多經·比丘(比丘/苾芻)
04280010428c26孰【元】不淨·生藏熟藏(熟/孰)
04280020428c26淡【宋】【元】【聖】不淨·痰癊(痰/淡)
04280030428c27肥【宋】【元】【明】不淨·肌肉(肌/肥)
04290010429b09三【元】【明】屍變·經一日二日
04290020429b20一【宋】【元】慈愍·下中上品
04290030429c05他【聖】快樂定地(地/他)
04290040429c09親怨怨親【宋】【元】【明】【聖】慈愍·親怨中三
04300010430a06第十三〔-〕【明】卷首品題行
04300020430a26淡【宋】【聖】界差別·水界(痰/淡)
04300050430c10臍*齊【聖】*阿那波那·臍輪(臍/齊)
04300060430c19共【元】入出息·要依身心
04310010431a08主【元】阿那波那·方便(生/主)
04310020431a28二*一【元】*算數·以二為一
04310030431b06之【元】算數·順逆
04310040431b17一一【聖】算數乃至十
04310050431b21等【元】【明】算數(算/等)
04310060431b24住【宋】【元】【明】心自任運(任/住)
04310070431b25根【元】安住入出息所緣(相/根)
04310080431b27轉【元】過算數位(取/轉)
04310090431c08惑【元】心無擾(或/惑)
04310100431c24〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】悟入識蘊·作意思惟
04320010432a11依【元】【明】悟入緣起(住/依)
04320020432a11習修脩習【聖】悟入·串習(習修/脩習)
04320030432c15入【聖】十六勝行·緣出息空無位(出/入·聖本入出對調·義理見目三)
04320040432c15出【聖】十六勝行·緣入息(入/出·聖本入出對調·同上)
04320050432c20若【元】【明】十六勝行·剛強(苦/若)
04330010433a22睡眠眠睡【宋】【元】【明】觀息·睡眠(睡眠/眠睡)
04330020433b09作【聖】第三靜慮·瑜伽行(依/作)
04330030433b10令【宋】【元】【明】瑜伽行·結句(今/令)

全 33 條底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印),無升定本案。帶*者係大正原欄星標,照錄。其中 0432003·0432004(0432c15)聖本「出息/入息」二字互易——十六勝行「緣出息空無位、緣入息」一段,聖本作「出/入」對調;底本從大正「出…入」讀,聖本異文並錄(此涉息觀次第之義,唯錄不判,白話該句已括註)。餘多屬形近訛(熟/孰·痰/淡·肌/肥·臍/齊)與同詞異譯(比丘/苾芻)、字序倒(親怨/怨親·睡眠/眠睡)。

附註·不採類 3 條(大正編者原註·非藏本異讀):0429005「此下聖本有光明皇后願文」(卷末題記)·0430003·0430004「親及執上麗本空白,三本俱有非字,聖本無空間」(麗本刻工空白之編者記)——皆非古德牒文、非字句異讀,錄之以明,不入正表、不升定本案。


三、聖教義之經據(眼·重——五停心對治·四道理正觀·十六勝行)

(一) 五停心=五行對治(頡隸伐多經明文·古德配屬)〔T30 0428a·遁倫 T42 0446b27–0447b18〕——遍滿所緣之《頡隸伐多經》即標「於相稱緣安住其心」:貪行→不淨·瞋行→慈愍·癡行→緣性緣起·慢行→界差別·尋思行→阿那波那念。此正承前補特伽羅段五行相之機(13-02-01「先立人」),對病與藥。遁倫逐門標治:「不淨…能淨貪行」「慈愍即能淨瞋行」「〔緣起〕明由思惟癡心清淨」「〔界差別〕慢心得淨」「〔數息〕為制持多尋伺故」。

(二) 四道理(緣性緣起正觀·眼·遁倫逐字)〔T30 0430a·遁倫 T42 0447a07–a17〕——緣性緣起所緣依四道理推求三世諸行「唯有諸法能引諸法,無有作者及受者」:觀待道理=「觀待無明等故有行等」;作用道理=「無明有唯生行作用,乃至生無假用生於老死」;證成道理=「有至教量說有緣起、有苦集智現量說證知、對敵論有比量」;法爾道理=「有佛無佛無明緣行等其性法爾,不由作者、受者」。遁倫並判「緣性即是四緣,緣起即十二支緣」〔T42 0447a07〕。(四道理後於思所成地廣明,本段已立其於緣起觀之用。)

(三) 十六勝行=四念住四四配(古來通義·二古德同)〔T30 0432a·遁倫 T42 0449b02·窺基 T43 0114b27〕——十六勝行依四念住「古來四四配之」:觀息長/短/遍身/息除身行=觀身;覺了喜/樂/心行/息除心行=觀受;覺了心/喜悅心/制持心/解脫心=觀心;無常/斷/離欲/滅隨觀=觀法。是見道後為斷餘結之進修(「勝前見道,故名勝行」遁倫 T42 0449a27)。

(四) 不淨治五貪·遍滿四影像即止觀(論本自說)——不淨六種對五貪(內身/外身婬/境/色/薩迦耶)〔T30 0429a〕;遍滿之有分別影像=毗鉢舍那品·無分別影像=奢摩他品(九住心)·事邊際性=盡所有/如所有·所作成辦=轉依超過影像現量智見〔T30 0427b〕——止觀之總綱。


四、諸家異釋(古德·唯錄不判)

★ 緣性緣起·四道理(遁倫詳釋·窺基僅一句)

〔遁倫 T42 0447a07–a17;窺基 T43 0114a04〕:

遁倫(四道理逐一·見目三逐字):「觀待無明等故有行…有至教量說有緣起、有苦集智現量說證知、對敵論有比量…有佛無佛無明緣行等其性法爾,不由作者受者。」 窺基(唯一句):「論曰『云何緣起緣性』等者,緣性,四緣也;緣起,十二因緣也。」(窺基不展四道理·唯錄此別。)

頡隸伐多·釋名(遁倫)

〔遁倫 T42 0445b16〕:「頡隸伐多,此云遇時,獲生佛世故。」問三句=「一、問為何義故於緣心住;二、問住心法用;三、問安住心善滿足時」。

三摩地口·定口喻(景·泰)

〔遁倫 T42 0444c24·0444c28〕:

景:「於念念中由緣相分定相續流,如食依口相續入腹,將喻名法名三摩地口…依緣影像入定出定故名三摩地門。」 泰:「境能生心如瓶口出物,故名定口;所知事相以定為體名分別體;令解分明照了故名光影。」 〔窺基同·T43 0113b14:「亦名三摩地口者,境能生心,如瓶口出物。」〕

不淨·青瘀變赤→顯色形色貪(泰·基·小乘大乘異)

〔遁倫 T42 0446b08·0446b10;窺基 T43 0113c21〕:

〔變赤·泰〕小乘云「死屍初青後赤,變作赤血身」以除形色貪;大乘解「先皮肉等色赤,除去皮肉形色名變赤」。 基:「貪白紅顯色,以青瘀等對治;於形色起長短方圓等貪,以除去皮肉對治。」 〔骨鎖治妙觸貪·遁倫引正理「骨鎖一觀通治四貪,今論但治妙觸貪」T42 0446b06〕。婬貪第四「承事貪」遁倫明示無別釋(顯色/形色/妙觸有治法詳辨·承事唯列名)〔T42 0446b06〕。

憺怕路·二義(泰基同)

〔遁倫 T42 0446b15;窺基 T43 0113c28〕:「憺怕,寂義,二釋:一、置死屍處寂寞無人故名憺怕,往彼處所故名為路;二、涅槃寂靜名曰憺怕,作不淨觀能得涅槃故名為路。」

界差別·風名·一合相(景·基)

〔遁倫 T42 0447b10–b18;窺基 T43 0114a17–a23〕:

「毘濕婆風,此云工巧風,能成萬物,舊云毘首羯磨風;吠藍婆,此云旋風,舊云旋嵐風。」「多羅掌=西方多羅樹葉裁如鵝掌為扇。」 〔畢鉢羅風·窺基引法師〕「人有此風,色如黑點;有云畢鉢羅即人食畢鉢羅,此風辛楚由如畢鉢。」 〔離一合相·治慢〕「即計為我,其實諸界為身計為一合之我,今離此想;即《般若經》云『如來說一合相』等者是。」

阿那波那·釋名·五門對藏論六門(遁倫·泰)

〔遁倫 T42 0447b24·0448a10;窺基 T43 0114a26〕:「阿那此云持來即入息,波那此云持去即出息(泰云:唐名持息來、持息去)。」「五門〔算數·悟入諸蘊·緣起·聖諦·十六勝行〕…若准藏論等有六〔數隨止觀還淨〕,今初門當彼數,餘門不同。」

十六勝行·勝行義(遠公·備·今解)

〔遁倫 T42 0449a26·窺基 T43 0114b27〕:「昔遠公『八因緣故名勝行』;備法師『是智慧性不共外道故名勝行』;今解『勝前見道故名勝行』。」修位(遠公):「初四〔觀身〕始觀在五停心、成在四念,次八在念處位,後四從煗至無學果」〔T42 0449c16〕。

〔按目:遁倫·窺基·景師·泰師·基師·備師·遠公(淨影慧遠)·三藏(玄奘) 皆古德;《對法》《順正理》《婆沙》《般若》《智度論》《雜阿含·頡隸伐多經》=經論(古德所引)。本目唯錄古德異釋與頁錨,不判可否。承事貪·遍滿四影像逐句·慈愍三品·六界內外事相,古德或無別釋(窺基於慈愍·四道理闕釋),其義依論本自說。〕


五、術語(漢/古德傳梵·發音輔助)

傳梵(音寫·發音輔助)
阿那波那念ānāpāna-smṛti入出息念(遁倫:阿那持來=入息·波那持去=出息)〔T42 0447b24〕
奢摩他śamatha
毘鉢舍那vipaśyanā
三摩地/三摩呬多samādhisamāhita定/等引(定地)
薩迦耶satkāya身(執身為一合之我)
頡隸伐多Revata(遁倫義「遇時」)經主比丘名〔T42 0445b16〕
羯羅藍/頞部曇/閉尸kalalaarbudapeśī胎中諸位(無息位)
遍滿/淨行/善巧/淨惑·不淨/慈愍/緣性緣起/界差別·事邊際/所作成辦·憺怕路·四道理·十六勝行—(義譯·從闕)義譯名相·非古德音寫

梵僅古德音寫;義譯名相 IAST 從闕(經與古德徵引之約),不據現代校本擬補。「憺怕路」古德釋為「寂義+路」(見目四),非純音寫,IAST 從闕。


六、譬喻·修辭

(一) 三摩地口·瓶口出物(景·泰·窺基·定境生心喻)〔遁倫 T42 0444c24/0444c28·窺基 T43 0113b14〕——以「瓶口出物」「食依口入腹」喻定境(所知事同分影像)能生定心、相續入定,故影像名「三摩地口/門」。 (二) 憺怕路·屍變九相(論本自立·治貪)〔T30 0429b〕——由屍陀林見屍死經一日二日七日,被烏鵲餓狗鵄鷲狐狼野干禽獸食噉,取相以譬自身「亦如是性、如是類,不能超過如是法性」;乃至骨鎖散壞、其色鮮白「猶如螺貝、或如鴿色」——青瘀至散壞諸相對治顯色/形色/妙觸/承事四婬貪。 (三) 離一合相(界差別治慢·論本引《般若》古德指明)〔窺基 T43 0114a23·遁倫 T42 0447b18〕——慢者計諸界(地水火風空識)所成之身為「一合之我」;界差別觀令離此「一合想」、得不淨想,憍慢微薄。古德指即《般若經》「如來說一合相」之義。


七、互讀(承衍)

  • 承補特伽羅·五行對五停(13-02-01→本子·眼):前段立二十八人、五行相(貪瞋癡慢尋思)為「機」;本段五停心(不淨/慈愍/緣性緣起/界差別/阿那波那念)即逐一對治之「藥」——頡隸伐多經「於相稱緣安住其心」明標藥病相稱。先立人、後對治,二子一貫。
  • 四道理 → 思所成地·緣起觀:緣性緣起所緣之四道理(觀待/作用/證成/法爾),後於思所成地(地11·11-00 自相三相)廣明;本段已立其於十二緣起正觀之用。
  • 九住心·止觀 → 三摩呬多地:無分別影像之九住心(內住…等持)、止舉捨相、轉依,與三摩呬多地(地06)互讀。
  • 十六勝行 → 四念住·菩提分修(13-02-04):十六勝行四念住四四配(觀身/受/心/法),正啟下文瑜伽修之三十七菩提分(四念住為首)。

八、校本定位

  • 底本:CBETA T30n1579 卷26–27·第二瑜伽處·遍滿+淨行所緣 0427a22–0433b29。
  • 古德頁錨:遁倫《論記》卷六之下→卷七之上 T42 0444b14–0449c19。最勝子 T1580 無逐句專釋。
  • 校勘:本段(0427a22–0433b29)大正原書校記 33 條藏本異讀全枚舉(目二(附)·正文錨全定位·底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印)·無升定本案)+不採類 3 條(卷末題記/麗本空白編者註);★0432c15 聖本「出/入」息二字互易涉十六勝行息觀次第之義,唯錄不判(白話該句括註);藏論五門/六門開合·變赤小乘大乘異釋·勝行義三說(唯錄目四);真諦卷26–27 佚從闕。

Ancient-master coverage of this section is doubly detailed: Dunlun's Notes, fasc. 6-lower → fasc. 7-upper 〔T42 0444b14–0449c19〕 (the four images of the pervasive object · the framework of the Revata-sūtra · the five conduct-purifying gates one by one · the four principles of the causation-of-conditioned-arising · the fourfold-times-fourfold matching of the sixteen superior practices to the four foundations of mindfulness; and drawing in Jing · Tai · Kuiji · Bei · Master Yuan of Jingying · the Tripiṭaka-master); Kuiji's Concise Compendium, fasc. 8 〔T43 0113b04–0114c25〕 (the four images · the four purities · the five greeds · the blue-bruised discoloring to red · the desolate-and-still road · the six elements · mindfulness of in-and-out breathing · the fourfold-times-fourfold matching of the sixteen superior practices to the four foundations of mindfulness; but on loving-kindness · the four principles of causation-of-conditioned-arising · Revata it gives no gloss). Jinaputra's Commentary has no phrase-by-phrase dedicated gloss.


I. Doctrinal-Outline Placement

Outline systemPlacement of this section
Xuanzang T1579, the seventeen stages of the Basic SectionThe thirteenth, the Śrāvaka Stage · the Second Yoga-Station · from the end of its first part to its second part · the first two of the third topic, the object: the pervasive object (the four images · the Revata-sūtra) + the conduct-purifying object (the five conduct-purifying gates: the impure / loving-kindness / the causation-of-conditioned-arising / the distinction of elements / mindfulness of in-and-out breathing) 〔T30 0427a22–0433b29 · ending before the skill-object at 0433c01〕
The treatise itselfThe object opens into four chapters (pervasive · conduct-purifying · skill · defilement-purifying). The four images of the pervasive: the image-with-discernment (the insight-class) · the image-without-discernment (the tranquillity-class · the nine mind-abidings) · the extent-of-the-real (the extent of all-there-is / the extent of as-it-is · the four principles) · the accomplishment-of-the-task (the transformation of the basis · surpassing the image · the direct-perception knowledge-vision); the five conduct-purifying gates match the five conducts (greed, hatred, delusion, conceit, discursive thought); mindfulness of in-and-out breathing has five cultivations (counting · penetrating the aggregates · dependent origination · the noble truths · the sixteen superior practices)
Dunlun's Notes「第三所緣中,初開四章」「淨行所緣…先列五門則是五度觀門」「此卷自來但解前二〔不淨·慈愍〕」 tr. "Within the third, the object, at the start it opens into four chapters"; "the conduct-purifying object … first lists five gates, which are the five contemplation-gates of measure"; "this fascicle, so far, glosses only the first two 〔the impure · loving-kindness〕" 〔T42 0444b14 · 0446a08 · 0446a10〕
Kuiji's Concise CompendiumThe fasc. 8 transcript · beginning 「論解有分別、無分別影像等中,如《對法》第十一抄會」 tr. "where the treatise glosses the image-with-discernment, the image-without-discernment, and so forth, as gathered in the transcript on fasc. 11 of the Abhidharma-samuccaya" 〔T43 0113b04〕

II. Alternate Translations · Collation of In-Scripture Parallels

  • Alternate translation: Paramārtha's Treatise on the Seventeen Stages survives in Chinese only as fasc. 1–3, not covering fasc. 26–27; there is no transmitted witness (lost) · omitted here.
  • The scripture cited by the treatise (a scriptural ground, not an alternate translation): the Revata-sūtra——the treatise's passage in which the elder Revata asks the World-Honored One about "settling one's mind upon a condition" 〔T30 0427c–0428c〕 is the scriptural warrant for the pervasive object; Dunlun glosses the name of the scripture's protagonist: 「頡隸伐多,此云遇時,獲生佛世故」 tr. "Revata, here rendered 'meeting the time,' because he gained birth in the age of a Buddha" 〔T42 0445b16〕.
  • In-scripture parallel (the Section on Ascertainment): the Śrāvaka Stage of the Section on Ascertainment 〔T30 0669b onward〕.
  • Collation against the Tibetan treatise's five gates (Dunlun · recorded only): on mindfulness of in-and-out breathing, 「若准藏論等有六,謂數、隨、止、觀、還、淨也。今此初門〔算數〕當彼數也,餘門不同」 tr. "if one takes the Tibetan treatise and the like, there are six, namely counting, following, stilling, observing, returning, purifying. Here the first gate 〔counting〕 corresponds to their 'counting'; the remaining gates differ" 〔T42 0448a10〕——the present treatise sets up five kinds of cultivation (counting · penetrating the aggregates · dependent origination · the noble truths · the sixteen superior practices), which combine and divide differently from the six gates of the Tibetan transmission; recorded only.
  • Collation: for this section (0427a22–0433b29) the Taishō base text's collation notes are fully enumerated under Heading II (Appendix) (although the <app> collation elements number 0 entry by entry, the base text's collation notes are recorded in note form——"zero collation elements" does not equal "no collation notes"). The ancient masters separately cite the Abhidharma-samuccaya, the Nyāyānusāra, the Mahāvibhāṣā, the Prajñāpāramitā, and the Dà-zhì-dù lùn; see Heading IV, recorded only.

(Appendix) Collation (full enumeration of the Taishō base text's collation notes)

For this section (0427a22–0433b29) the Taishō base text's collation notes total 33 canon-witness variant readings; there are also 3 original notes by the Taishō editors (colophon-at-fascicle-end / Korean-edition-blank types, not adopted, listed separately). The base text follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); not a single note in this section rises to a critical-edition emendation (none has both an ancient-master lemma citation and doctrinal support for the variant); the variants are recorded alongside for the record:

Note #AnchorBase 【大 Taishō】VariantContext
04270010427b01簡*揀【元】【明】*The image-with-discernment · discriminating-selection
04270020427b07止【聖】Hearing the true Dharma (正/止)
04270030427c09地【元】Revata · tranquillity (śamatha)
04270040427c29比丘*苾芻【宋】*【元】*【明】*The Revata-sūtra · bhikṣu (比丘/苾芻)
04280010428c26孰【元】The impure · the digested and undigested stores (熟/孰)
04280020428c26淡【宋】【元】【聖】The impure · phlegm (痰/淡)
04280030428c27肥【宋】【元】【明】The impure · flesh (肌/肥)
04290010429b09三【元】【明】Corpse-decay · after one or two days
04290020429b20一【宋】【元】Loving-kindness · the lower, middle, and upper grades
04290030429c05他【聖】The stage of pleasurable concentration (地/他)
04290040429c09親怨怨親【宋】【元】【明】【聖】Loving-kindness · dear ones, enemies, and the neutral three
04300010430a06第十三〔-〕【明】The fascicle-head chapter-title line
04300020430a26淡【宋】【聖】The distinction of elements · the water-element (痰/淡)
04300050430c10臍*齊【聖】*In-and-out breathing · the navel-wheel (臍/齊)
04300060430c19共【元】In-and-out breathing must depend on body and mind
04310010431a08主【元】In-and-out breathing · the skillful means (生/主)
04310020431a28二*一【元】*Counting · taking two as one
04310030431b06之【元】Counting · forward and reverse
04310040431b17一一【聖】Counting up to ten
04310050431b21等【元】【明】Counting (算/等)
04310060431b24住【宋】【元】【明】The mind moving of its own accord (任/住)
04310070431b25根【元】Settling upon the in-and-out-breath object (相/根)
04310080431b27轉【元】Passing beyond the counting phase (取/轉)
04310090431c08惑【元】The mind undisturbed (或/惑)
04310100431c24〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】Penetrating the consciousness-aggregate · attending and reflecting
04320010432a11依【元】【明】Penetrating dependent origination (住/依)
04320020432a11習修脩習【聖】Penetrating · repeated familiarization (習修/脩習)
04320030432c15入【聖】The sixteen superior practices · attending to the out-breath in its empty-and-void phase (出/入 · the Sheng edition swaps out-and-in · doctrine under Heading III)
04320040432c15出【聖】The sixteen superior practices · attending to the in-breath (入/出 · the Sheng edition swaps out-and-in · same as above)
04320050432c20若【元】【明】The sixteen superior practices · the harsh-and-strong (苦/若)
04330010433a22睡眠眠睡【宋】【元】【明】Observing the breath · sleep (睡眠/眠睡)
04330020433b09作【聖】The third meditative absorption · the yoga-practice (依/作)
04330030433b10令【宋】【元】【明】The yoga-practice · the concluding phrase (今/令)

All 33 notes: the base text follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); none rises to a critical-edition emendation. Those marked * carry an asterisk in the Taishō's own column and are recorded as-is. Among them, 0432003 · 0432004 (0432c15): the Sheng edition transposes the two characters "out-breath / in-breath"——in the sixteen-superior-practices passage "attending to the out-breath in its empty-and-void phase, attending to the in-breath," the Sheng edition swaps "out / in"; the base text follows the Taishō reading "out … in," and the Sheng variant is recorded alongside (this touches the doctrine of the sequence of breath-observation, recorded only and not adjudicated; the vernacular has already bracketed a note at that clause). The rest are mostly graphic near-errors (熟/孰 · 痰/淡 · 肌/肥 · 臍/齊), same-word alternate transliterations (比丘/苾芻), and character-order inversions (親怨/怨親 · 睡眠/眠睡).

Supplementary note · 3 not-adopted entries (Taishō editors' original notes · not canon-witness variants): 0429005 「此下聖本有光明皇后願文」 tr. "below this the Sheng edition has the vow-text of Empress Kōmyō" (an end-of-fascicle colophon) · 0430003 · 0430004 「親及執上麗本空白,三本俱有非字,聖本無空間」 tr. "above 親 and 執 the Korean edition is blank; the three editions all have the character 非; the Sheng edition has no gap" (an editor's note on a carver's blank in the Korean edition)——none is an ancient-master lemma citation, none a variant in wording; they are recorded to make the record clear, not entered in the main table, and none rises to a critical-edition emendation.


III. Scriptural Grounds for the Meaning of the Holy Teaching (the Point of the Eye · Weighty——the five conduct-purifying gates as antidote · the four principles as right contemplation · the sixteen superior practices)

(1) The five conduct-purifying gates = the antidotes to the five conducts (the Revata-sūtra's own words · the ancient masters' assignment) 〔T30 0428a · Dunlun T42 0446b27–0447b18〕——the Revata-sūtra of the pervasive object itself sets down 「於相稱緣安住其心」 tr. "settle the mind upon a fitting condition": the greed-conduct → the impure · the hatred-conduct → loving-kindness · the delusion-conduct → the causation-of-conditioned-arising · the conceit-conduct → the distinction of elements · the discursive-thought-conduct → mindfulness of in-and-out breathing. This directly inherits the five-conduct machinery of the earlier person-section (13-02-01 "first setting up the person"), matching disease to medicine. Dunlun marks each gate's antidote: 「不淨…能淨貪行」「慈愍即能淨瞋行」「〔緣起〕明由思惟癡心清淨」「〔界差別〕慢心得淨」「〔數息〕為制持多尋伺故」 tr. "the impure … is able to purify the greed-conduct"; "loving-kindness is precisely able to purify the hatred-conduct"; "〔dependent origination〕 shows that by reflection the deluded mind is purified"; "〔the distinction of elements〕 the conceited mind is purified"; "〔counting the breath〕 is for restraining much applied-and-sustained thought."

(2) The four principles (the causation-of-conditioned-arising as right contemplation · the Point of the Eye · Dunlun word-for-word) 〔T30 0430a · Dunlun T42 0447a07–a17〕——the object of the causation-of-conditioned-arising, relying on the four principles, investigates the formations of the three times as "there are only phenomena drawing forth phenomena, with no agent and no experiencer": the principle of dependence = 「觀待無明等故有行等」 tr. "in dependence on ignorance (avidyā) and so forth, there are formations and so forth"; the principle of function = 「無明有唯生行作用,乃至生無假用生於老死」 tr. "the existence of ignorance has only the function of giving rise to formations, and so on, until birth without any borrowed function gives rise to aging-and-death"; the principle of proof-by-evidence = 「有至教量說有緣起、有苦集智現量說證知、對敵論有比量」 tr. "there is the authoritative-teaching measure stating that dependent origination exists, there is the direct-perception knowledge of suffering-and-origination stating its realization, and against an opposing thesis there is inference"; the principle of natural-so-ness = 「有佛無佛無明緣行等其性法爾,不由作者、受者」 tr. "whether a Buddha exists or not, that ignorance conditions the formations and so forth is its nature by natural-so-ness, not owing to an agent or an experiencer." Dunlun further judges 「緣性即是四緣,緣起即十二支緣」 tr. "the nature-of-conditions is precisely the four conditions; conditioned-arising is precisely the twelvefold-limb conditioning" 〔T42 0447a07〕. (The four principles are later expounded at length in the Stage of What is Attained through Reflection; this section has already established their use in the contemplation of dependent origination.)

(3) The sixteen superior practices = the fourfold-times-fourfold matching to the four foundations of mindfulness (the received sense of the ancients · two ancient masters agree) 〔T30 0432a · Dunlun T42 0449b02 · Kuiji T43 0114b27〕——the sixteen superior practices, following the four foundations of mindfulness, are "matched fourfold-times-fourfold by the ancients": observing the breath long / short / whole-body / calming the bodily formation = observing the body; discerning joy / bliss / the mental formation / calming the mental formation = observing feeling; discerning the mind / the gladdened mind / the restrained mind / the liberated mind = observing the mind; the following-observation of impermanence / relinquishment / dispassion / cessation = observing dharmas. This is the further cultivation, after the path-of-seeing, for severing the remaining fetters (「勝前見道,故名勝行」 tr. "surpassing the prior path-of-seeing, hence named 'superior practice'"—Dunlun T42 0449a27).

(4) The impure heals the five greeds · the four images of the pervasive are precisely tranquillity-and-insight (the treatise's own statement)——the impure has six kinds answering to the five greeds (greed for the inner body / for the outer body in lust / for objects / for color / for the reifying view) 〔T30 0429a〕; among the pervasive, the image-with-discernment = the insight-class · the image-without-discernment = the tranquillity-class (the nine mind-abidings) · the extent-of-the-real = the extent of all-there-is / of as-it-is · the accomplishment-of-the-task = the transformation of the basis, surpassing the image, the direct-perception knowledge-vision 〔T30 0427b〕——the overall rubric of tranquillity-and-insight.


IV. The Explanations of the Various Masters (the Ancients · Recorded Only, Not Adjudicated)

★ The causation-of-conditioned-arising · the four principles (Dunlun's detailed gloss · Kuiji only one line)

〔Dunlun T42 0447a07–a17; Kuiji T43 0114a04〕:

Dunlun (the four principles one by one · word-for-word under Heading III): 「觀待無明等故有行…有至教量說有緣起、有苦集智現量說證知、對敵論有比量…有佛無佛無明緣行等其性法爾,不由作者受者。」 tr. "in dependence on ignorance and so forth, there are formations … there is the authoritative-teaching measure stating that dependent origination exists, there is the direct-perception knowledge of suffering-and-origination stating its realization, and against an opposing thesis there is inference … whether a Buddha exists or not, that ignorance conditions the formations and so forth is its nature by natural-so-ness, not owing to an agent or experiencer." Kuiji (the sole line): 「論曰『云何緣起緣性』等者,緣性,四緣也;緣起,十二因緣也。」 tr. "As for the treatise's 'what is conditioned-arising and the nature-of-conditions,' the nature-of-conditions is the four conditions; conditioned-arising is the twelvefold causation." (Kuiji does not unfold the four principles · this difference recorded only.)

Revata · the gloss of the name (Dunlun)

〔Dunlun T42 0445b16〕: 「頡隸伐多,此云遇時,獲生佛世故。」 tr. "Revata, here rendered 'meeting the time,' because he gained birth in the age of a Buddha." The three questions = "first, asking for what purpose the mind is settled upon a condition; second, asking the operation of the settled-mind method; third, asking when the settled mind is well fulfilled."

The mouth of samādhi · the simile of the mouth of concentration (Jing · Tai)

〔Dunlun T42 0444c24 · 0444c28〕:

Jing: 「於念念中由緣相分定相續流,如食依口相續入腹,將喻名法名三摩地口…依緣影像入定出定故名三摩地門。」 tr. "moment after moment, by taking the image-portion as condition, concentration continuously flows on, like food that, by way of the mouth, continuously enters the belly; taking the simile, it is named 'the mouth of samādhi' … because by taking the image as condition one enters and exits concentration, it is named 'the gate of samādhi.'" Tai: 「境能生心如瓶口出物,故名定口;所知事相以定為體名分別體;令解分明照了故名光影。」 tr. "the object can give rise to the mind, like things coming out of the mouth of a jar, hence named 'the mouth of concentration'; the mark of the known thing takes concentration as its substance, named 'the discerned substance'; because it makes understanding clear and illumined, it is named 'light-and-image.'" 〔Kuiji agrees · T43 0113b14: 「亦名三摩地口者,境能生心,如瓶口出物。」 tr. "it is also named 'the mouth of samādhi': the object can give rise to the mind, like things coming out of the mouth of a jar."〕

The impure · the blue-bruised discoloring to red → greed for color and for shape (Tai · Kuiji · the Hīnayāna–Mahāyāna difference)

〔Dunlun T42 0446b08 · 0446b10; Kuiji T43 0113c21〕:

〔Discoloring to red · Tai〕 the Hīnayāna says 「死屍初青後赤,變作赤血身」 tr. "the corpse is at first blue and later red, turning into a red-blooded body," so as to remove greed for shape; the Mahāyāna explains 「先皮肉等色赤,除去皮肉形色名變赤」 tr. "first the skin, flesh, and other color are red; removing the skin and flesh, the shape is what is named 'discoloring to red.'" Kuiji: 「貪白紅顯色,以青瘀等對治;於形色起長短方圓等貪,以除去皮肉對治。」 tr. "greed for the white and red of color is countered by the blue-bruised and the like; greed arising for shape—long, short, square, round—is countered by removing the skin and flesh." 〔The chain-of-bones heals greed for subtle touch · Dunlun cites the Nyāyānusāra 「骨鎖一觀通治四貪,今論但治妙觸貪」 tr. "the single contemplation of the chain-of-bones heals all four greeds, but the present treatise heals only greed for subtle touch" T42 0446b06〕. For the fourth, "greed in serving," of lust-greed, Dunlun explicitly gives no separate gloss (color / shape / subtle-touch each have their antidote-method detailed · serving is listed by name only) 〔T42 0446b06〕.

The desolate-and-still road · two senses (Tai and Kuiji agree)

〔Dunlun T42 0446b15; Kuiji T43 0113c28〕: 「憺怕,寂義,二釋:一、置死屍處寂寞無人故名憺怕,往彼處所故名為路;二、涅槃寂靜名曰憺怕,作不淨觀能得涅槃故名為路。」 tr. "'Desolate-and-still' has the sense of quietude, with two explanations: first, the place where corpses are laid is silent and unpeopled, hence named 'desolate-and-still,' and because one goes to that place it is named 'road'; second, the quietude of nirvāṇa is named 'desolate-and-still,' and because doing the contemplation of the impure can attain nirvāṇa it is named 'road.'"

The distinction of elements · the names of the winds · the mark-of-a-single-aggregate (Jing · Kuiji)

〔Dunlun T42 0447b10–b18; Kuiji T43 0114a17–a23〕:

「毘濕婆風,此云工巧風,能成萬物,舊云毘首羯磨風;吠藍婆,此云旋風,舊云旋嵐風。」 tr. "the Viśvakarman wind, here rendered 'the artisan wind,' able to form the myriad things, formerly called the Viśvakarman wind; the Vairambha, here rendered 'the whirlwind,' formerly called the Vairambha whirlwind." 「多羅掌=西方多羅樹葉裁如鵝掌為扇。」 tr. "the tāla-palm = in the West, a tāla-tree leaf cut like a goose's webbed foot to make a fan." 〔The pippala wind · Kuiji cites the master〕 「人有此風,色如黑點;有云畢鉢羅即人食畢鉢羅,此風辛楚由如畢鉢。」 tr. "a person has this wind, its color like a black speck; some say pippala is the pippala that people eat, and this wind is pungent-and-sharp just like the pippala." 〔Leaving the mark-of-a-single-aggregate · heals conceit〕 「即計為我,其實諸界為身計為一合之我,今離此想;即《般若經》云『如來說一合相』等者是。」 tr. "he reckons it as a self—in truth the several elements forming the body are reckoned as a single-aggregate self; now one leaves this notion; this is what the Prajñāpāramitā-sūtra means by 'the Tathāgata speaks of the mark-of-a-single-aggregate' and the rest."

In-and-out breathing · the gloss of the name · the five gates against the Tibetan treatise's six gates (Dunlun · Tai)

〔Dunlun T42 0447b24 · 0448a10; Kuiji T43 0114a26〕: 「阿那此云持來即入息,波那此云持去即出息(泰云:唐名持息來、持息去)。」 tr. "āna, here rendered 'bearing-in,' is the in-breath; apāna, here rendered 'bearing-out,' is the out-breath (Tai says: the Tang names them 'bearing the breath in,' 'bearing the breath out')." 「五門〔算數·悟入諸蘊·緣起·聖諦·十六勝行〕…若准藏論等有六〔數隨止觀還淨〕,今初門當彼數,餘門不同。」 tr. "the five gates 〔counting · penetrating the aggregates · dependent origination · the noble truths · the sixteen superior practices〕 … if one takes the Tibetan treatise and the like, there are six 〔counting, following, stilling, observing, returning, purifying〕; here the first gate corresponds to their 'counting,' and the remaining gates differ."

The sixteen superior practices · the sense of "superior practice" (Master Yuan of Jingying · Bei · the present explanation)

〔Dunlun T42 0449a26 · Kuiji T43 0114b27〕: 「昔遠公『八因緣故名勝行』;備法師『是智慧性不共外道故名勝行』;今解『勝前見道故名勝行』。」 tr. "of old, Master Yuan: 'by eight causes-and-conditions it is named superior practice'; Master Bei: 'it is of the nature of wisdom and not shared with the non-Buddhists, hence named superior practice'; the present explanation: 'it surpasses the prior path-of-seeing, hence named superior practice.'" The phases of cultivation (Master Yuan): 「初四〔觀身〕始觀在五停心、成在四念,次八在念處位,後四從煗至無學果」 tr. "the first four 〔observing the body〕 begin to be contemplated at the five conduct-purifying gates and are completed at the four foundations of mindfulness; the next eight are at the foundations-of-mindfulness phase; the last four run from warmth to the fruit of the non-learner" 〔T42 0449c16〕.

〔Heading note: Dunlun · Kuiji · Master Jing · Master Tai · Master Kuiji · Master Bei · Master Yuan (Huiyuan of Jingying) · the Tripiṭaka-master (Xuanzang) are all ancient masters; the Abhidharma-samuccaya, the Nyāyānusāra, the Mahāvibhāṣā, the Prajñāpāramitā, the Dà-zhì-dù lùn, the Saṃyukta-āgama · Revata-sūtra = scripture-and-treatise (cited by the ancient masters). This heading records only the ancient masters' divergent explanations with their page-anchors, and does not adjudicate for or against. On greed-in-serving · the four images of the pervasive phrase-by-phrase · the three grades of loving-kindness · the inner-and-outer thing-marks of the six elements, the ancient masters may give no separate gloss (Kuiji gives no gloss on loving-kindness · the four principles); their sense follows the treatise's own statement.〕


V. Terminology (漢 / ancient-master-transmitted Sanskrit · pronunciation aid)

Transmitted Sanskrit (transliteration · pronunciation aid)Sense
阿那波那念ānāpāna-smṛtiMindfulness of in-and-out breathing (Dunlun: āna bearing-in = the in-breath · apāna bearing-out = the out-breath) 〔T42 0447b24〕
奢摩他śamathaTranquillity
毘鉢舍那vipaśyanāInsight
三摩地/三摩呬多samādhisamāhitaConcentration / meditative equipoise (the stage of equipoise)
薩迦耶satkāyaThe body (reckoning the body as a single-aggregate self)
頡隸伐多Revata (Dunlun's sense: "meeting the time")The name of the bhikṣu who is the scripture's protagonist 〔T42 0445b16〕
羯羅藍/頞部曇/閉尸kalalaarbudapeśīThe stages within the womb (the breathless phases)
遍滿/淨行/善巧/淨惑·不淨/慈愍/緣性緣起/界差別·事邊際/所作成辦·憺怕路·四道理·十六勝行—(rendered by meaning · left blank)Meaning-rendered technical terms · not ancient-master transliterations

Sanskrit is given only as ancient-master transliteration; for meaning-rendered technical terms the IAST is left blank (the convention of citing scripture and the ancient masters), not supplied from modern critical editions. "The desolate-and-still road" (憺怕路) is glossed by the ancient masters as "the sense of quietude + road" (see Heading IV), and being not a pure transliteration, its IAST is left blank.


VI. Similes · Rhetoric

(1) The mouth of samādhi · things coming out of the mouth of a jar (Jing · Tai · Kuiji · the simile of the concentration-object giving rise to the mind) 〔Dunlun T42 0444c24 / 0444c28 · Kuiji T43 0113b14〕——by "things coming out of the mouth of a jar" and "food entering the belly by way of the mouth," the concentration-object (the image concordant with the known thing) is figured as able to give rise to the concentration-mind and to enter concentration continuously, hence the image is named "the mouth / gate of samādhi."

(2) The desolate-and-still road · the nine marks of corpse-decay (the treatise's own setting · healing greed) 〔T30 0429b〕——from seeing in the charnel-ground a corpse dead one day, two days, seven days, devoured by crows, magpies, starving dogs, owls, vultures, foxes, wolves, jackals, and the beasts, one takes the mark to figure one's own body as "of the same nature, the same kind, unable to surpass such a dharma-nature"; and on to the chain-of-bones scattered and broken, its color fresh and white "like a conch-shell, or like a dove's hue"——the marks from the blue-bruised to the scattered-and-broken counter the four lust-greeds for color / shape / subtle-touch / serving.

(3) Leaving the mark-of-a-single-aggregate (the distinction of elements heals conceit · the treatise cites the Prajñāpāramitā, the ancient masters point it out) 〔Kuiji T43 0114a23 · Dunlun T42 0447b18〕——the conceited one reckons the body formed of the several elements (earth, water, fire, wind, space, consciousness) as "a single-aggregate self"; the contemplation of the distinction of elements makes one leave this "single-aggregate notion" and attain the impure-notion, so that conceit grows thin. The ancient masters point out that this is precisely the sense of the Prajñāpāramitā-sūtra's "the Tathāgata speaks of the mark-of-a-single-aggregate."


VII. Cross-Reading (Carrying-Forward)

  • Inheriting the person · the five conducts matched to the five conduct-purifying gates (13-02-01 → this section · the Point of the Eye): the earlier section sets up the twenty-eight persons and the five conduct-marks (greed, hatred, delusion, conceit, discursive thought) as the "machinery"; this section's five conduct-purifying gates (the impure / loving-kindness / the causation-of-conditioned-arising / the distinction of elements / mindfulness of in-and-out breathing) are precisely the "medicine" that heals each in turn——the Revata-sūtra's "settle the mind upon a fitting condition" clearly marks the matching of medicine to disease. First set up the person, then the antidote: the two sections are of one piece.
  • The four principles → the Stage of What is Attained through Reflection · the contemplation of dependent origination: the four principles of the object of the causation-of-conditioned-arising (dependence / function / proof-by-evidence / natural-so-ness) are later expounded at length in the Stage of What is Attained through Reflection (Stage 11 · 11-00 the own-mark and three marks); this section has already established their use in the right contemplation of the twelvefold dependent origination.
  • The nine mind-abidings · tranquillity-and-insight → the Stage of Meditative Equipoise: the nine mind-abidings of the image-without-discernment (inner abiding … equipoise), the marks of stilling, exerting, and equanimity, and the transformation of the basis, cross-read with the Stage of Meditative Equipoise (Stage 06).
  • The sixteen superior practices → the four foundations of mindfulness · the cultivation of the awakening-factors (13-02-04): the fourfold-times-fourfold matching of the sixteen superior practices to the four foundations of mindfulness (observing the body / feeling / mind / dharmas) directly opens onto the following passage's thirty-seven factors of awakening in yogic cultivation (with the four foundations of mindfulness at their head).

VIII. Placement of the Critical Editions

  • Base text: CBETA T30n1579 fasc. 26–27 · the Second Yoga-Station · the pervasive + conduct-purifying object 0427a22–0433b29.
  • Ancient-master page-anchors: Dunlun's Notes, fasc. 6-lower → fasc. 7-upper T42 0444b14–0449c19. 8 T43 0113b04–0114c25. Jinaputra T1580 has no phrase-by-phrase dedicated gloss.
  • Collation: for this section (0427a22–0433b29) the Taishō base text's 33 canon-witness variant readings are fully enumerated (Heading II Appendix · all body-anchors fully placed · the base text follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded) · none rises to a critical-edition emendation) + 3 not-adopted entries (an end-of-fascicle colophon / a Korean-edition-blank editor's note); ★0432c15 the Sheng edition's transposition of the two breath-characters "out / in" touches the doctrine of the sequence of breath-observation in the sixteen superior practices, recorded only and not adjudicated (the vernacular has bracketed a note at that clause); the combining-and-dividing of the five / six gates against the Tibetan treatise · the Hīnayāna–Mahāyāna difference on "discoloring to red" · the three explanations of the sense of "superior practice" (recorded only under Heading IV); Paramārtha's fasc. 26–27 are lost, omitted here.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing — with AI-assisted consistency checking

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0