瑜伽師地論 聲聞地 · 第三瑜伽處 · 白品九加行 · 淨障
止觀體立,本葉教『修中的手眼』——九種下功法·止觀舉捨校心·淨障四步·修作意四作意。眼仍重:雙運轉道=心一境性=通達影像唯識(解深密),且此回經內外互證(攝決擇·攝事分回指本葉為所本)。
一句話:白品九種加行(相應〔藥病相應·五行配五停心〕·串習·不緩〔修無常·乃至一息念〕·無倒·應時〔止觀舉捨〕·解了·無厭足·不捨軛·正加行〔數除數遣·畫師喻〕)→黑白十八加行→「如是名為心一境性」結科6;淨障(四因緣淨除四障〔怯弱·蓋覆·尋思·自舉〕);止觀雙運轉道(九相心住第九三摩呬多·轉依·現量智);中嗢柁南;修作意(四作意〔調練心·滋潤心·生輕安·淨智見〕·可厭患四·可欣尚三·鍛金師喻)科8 起。
三個眼目
-
白品九加行·應時止觀舉捨(修中校心):九加行令心速疾得定(黑品反是);「相應」古德點「藥病相應」〔遁倫 T42 0465a〕。應時加行開止觀舉捨四行,各明自性·相·時——止對掉(心掉舉時)·觀/舉對沈(心沈沒/沈下時)·捨對平(掉舉已解脫時)。此與《解深密》逐義同〔T16 0699b〕,且攝決擇分聲聞地〔T30 0676c 五種不放逸〕逐字平行、攝事分卷97〔0855b〕回指本葉為所本——經內外互證。
-
正加行數除數遣·淨障四步:正加行=數起勝解·數正除遣(畫師弟子喻:作了即毀·毀了復作→形相轉明〔T30 0457a〕;正除遣五種唯取內攝其心·不念作意;「而行」不取不捨——止行轉故不名捨·不作相無分別故不名取〔不取依論本自說〕)。淨障由四因緣(遍知自性·因緣·過患·修習對治)除四障(怯弱〔六因緣〕·蓋覆五蓋·尋思·自舉);非理作意五例(淨/瞋/闇/惡尋思/計我我所)對治以相違如理作意。
-
★雙運轉道=心一境性=通達影像唯識(義眼·續前葉):止觀雙運至九相心住第九(三摩呬多),任運轉道·無功用轉;身心輕安離麁重=轉依·心一境性離散亂=得轉依·生現量智〔遁倫 T42 0466b〕。雙運轉道=心一境性=「通達三摩地所行影像唯是其識·復思惟如性」〔解深密 T16 0698b〕——續九住心段唯識義眼,聲聞止觀雙運之所緣經判為唯識所現。
附註:修作意四作意(調練心令厭·滋潤心令欣·生輕安·淨智見)+可厭患四(自他衰損現前·自他興盛過去變壞)+可欣尚三(三寶·尸羅清淨·自所證)+鍛金師喻(燒鍊棄垢=厭·投水調柔=欣〔T30 0459b〕)→ 13-03-04 初修業者依此續修。★辨異:本論「修作意」=此四作意;窺基《略纂》卷九「第五修作意」實指離欲七作意(了相→加行究竟果)〔T43 0119c〕——名同所指異,不混。古德二態:遁倫《論記》卷七之下〔T42 0465a09 起·逐科詳釋·引景/泰/三藏〕;窺基《略纂》卷八末〔T43 0119a23·唯淨障不淨觀細目·餘略過〕;最勝子無逐句。義理開講見〈義疏〉。
The essence of tranquillity-and-insight now set up, this leaf teaches "the working hand and eye of cultivation" — the nine ways of applying oneself · the correcting of the mind by tranquillity, insight, exertion, and equanimity · the four steps of purifying the obstructions · the four kinds of attention in the cultivation of attention. The eye is still heavy: the path of yoked working = one-pointedness of mind = penetrating that the image is consciousness-only (Saṃdhinirmocana); and this time it is attested within and without the scripture (the Section on Ascertainment and the Section on the Gathering of Events point back to this leaf as their source).
In one line: the nine preparatory efforts of the bright class (corresponding 〔medicine suited to disease · the five conducts matched to the five settling-of-mind gateways〕· repeated-practice · unslackened 〔cultivating impermanence · down to the mindfulness of a single breath〕· unerring · timely 〔tranquillity, insight, exertion, equanimity〕· understanding · insatiable · yoke-not-cast-off · correct 〔repeated clearing, repeated removing · the painter's simile〕) → the eighteen preparatory efforts, dark and bright → "such is what is called one-pointedness of mind" concludes sub-section 6; purifying the obstructions (purging the four obstructions 〔faint-heartedness · covering-over · discursive thought · self-exaltation〕by four causal factors); the path of the yoked working of tranquillity and insight (the ninth mark of mental settling, meditative equipoise · the transformation of the basis · direct-perception knowledge); the middle uddāna; the cultivation of attention (the four kinds of attention 〔mind-training · mind-moistening · pliancy-producing · pure-knowledge-and-vision〕· the four grounds of the wearisome · the three grounds of the admirable · the simile of the goldsmith) — sub-section 8 is raised.
Three Points of the Eye
-
The nine bright-class preparatory efforts · timely tranquillity, insight, exertion, equanimity (correcting the mind in cultivation): the nine preparatory efforts make the mind swiftly gain concentration (the dark class is the reverse); of "corresponding" the ancient masters point out "medicine corresponds to disease" 〔Dunlun T42 0465a〕. Timely preparatory effort opens the four practices of tranquillity, insight, exertion, and equanimity, each clarifying its intrinsic nature, mark, and time — tranquillity counters agitation (when the mind is agitated) · insight / exertion counter sinking (when the mind sinks / sinks down) · equanimity counters evenness (when the agitation has been liberated). This accords meaning for meaning with the Saṃdhinirmocana 〔T16 0699b〕, and the Section on Ascertainment's Śrāvaka Stage 〔T30 0676c, the five kinds of non-heedlessness〕 runs parallel word for word, while the Section on the Gathering of Events, fascicle 97 〔0855b〕, points back to this leaf as its source — attested within and without the scripture.
-
Correct preparatory effort · repeated clearing, repeated removing · the four steps of purifying the obstructions: correct preparatory effort = repeatedly arousing resolute conviction · repeatedly correctly clearing away (the simile of the painter's apprentice: made, then wiped out · wiped out, then made again → the shape turns clearer 〔T30 0457a〕; of the five kinds of correct clearing-away, only inwardly gathering the mind · the attention of not-minding are taken up; "how one practices" — neither taking up nor casting off — because the practice of tranquillity turns it is not named casting-off · because one makes no mark and does not discriminate it is not named taking-up 〔"not taking up" is stated by the treatise-text itself〕). Purifying the obstructions purges the four obstructions (faint-heartedness 〔six causes and conditions〕· covering-over, the five hindrances · discursive thought · self-exaltation) by four causal factors (thoroughly knowing the intrinsic nature · the causes and conditions · the faults · cultivating the counteraction); the five instances of unprincipled attention (pure / hatred / darkness / evil discursive thought / positing a self and what belongs to a self) are counteracted by the principled attention contrary to them.
-
★ The path of yoked working = one-pointedness of mind = penetrating that the image is consciousness-only (the eye of doctrine · continuing from the previous leaf): the yoked working of tranquillity and insight reaching the ninth of the nine marks of mental settling (meditative equipoise), the path turning spontaneously · turning without exertion; pliancy of body and mind departing from coarseness-and-heaviness = the transformation of the basis · one-pointedness of mind departing from scatteredness = gaining the transformation of the basis · direct-perception knowledge arises 〔Dunlun T42 0466b〕. The path of yoked working = one-pointedness of mind = 「通達三摩地所行影像唯是其識·復思惟如性」 tr. "penetrating that the image ranged over in meditative concentration is only its own consciousness · further reflecting on its suchness-nature" 〔Saṃdhinirmocana T16 0698b〕 — continuing the consciousness-only eye of doctrine from the nine-stations-of-mind leaf; the śrāvaka's object in the yoked working of tranquillity and insight is adjudged by the scripture to be manifested by consciousness-only.
Appended note: the four kinds of attention in the cultivation of attention (the mind-training makes one weary · the mind-moistening makes one rejoice · the pliancy-producing · the pure-knowledge-and-vision) + the four grounds of the wearisome (the decline of oneself and another present · the flourishing of oneself and another altered-and-ruined in the past) + the three grounds of the admirable (the Three Jewels · the purity of moral discipline · what one has oneself realized) + the simile of the goldsmith (smelting and casting off the filth = weariness · casting into water and making supple = rejoicing 〔T30 0459b〕) → 13-03-04, one who is at first cultivating the work continues to cultivate in dependence on this. ★ A distinguishing note: this treatise's "cultivation of attention" = these four kinds of attention; Kuiji's "fifth, cultivation of attention" in the Concise Compendium, fascicle 9, refers in fact to the seven attentions of dispassion (apprehending-the-aspect → the fruit of the culmination of effort) 〔T43 0119c〕 — the same name, a different referent; not to be confounded. Two postures of the ancient masters: Dunlun's Notes, the latter part of fascicle 7 〔T42 0465a09 onward · detailed gloss section by section · citing Jing / Tai / the Tripiṭaka-master〕; Kuiji's Concise Compendium, the end of fascicle 8 〔T43 0119a23 · only the fine details of purifying the obstruction and the contemplation of the impure · the rest passed over in brief〕; Jinaputra has no line-by-line gloss. For the opening-up of the doctrine, see the 〈Exposition〉.
復次,此中有九種白品所攝加行。與此相違,當知即是九種黑品所攝加行。云何名為白品所攝九種加行?一、相應加行,二、串習加行,三、無倒加行,四、不緩加行,五、應時加行,六、解了加行,七、無厭足加行,八、不捨軛加行,九、正加行。由此九種白品所攝加行故,能令其心速疾得定,令三摩地轉更勝進。又由此故,於所應往地及隨所應得,速疾能往、能得,無有稽遲。黑品所攝九種加行,不能令心速疾得定,不令三摩地轉更勝進。又由此故,於所應往地及隨所應得,極大稽遲,不能速疾往趣、獲得。
云何名為相應加行?謂若貪行者,應於不淨安住其心;若瞋行者,應於慈愍安住其心;若癡行者,應於緣起安住其心;若憍慢行者,應於界差別安住其心;若尋思行者,應於阿那波那念安住其心;若等分行者,或薄塵行者,應隨所樂攀緣一境安住其心;勤修加行。如是名為相應加行。
云何名為串習加行?謂於奢摩他、毘鉢舍那,已曾數習乃至少分,非於一切皆初修業。所以者何?初修業者,雖於相應所緣境界勤修加行,而有諸蓋數數現行,身心麁重。由是因緣,不能令心速疾得定。如是名為串習加行。
云何名為不緩加行?謂無間方便、殷重方便勤修觀行。若從定出,或為乞食,或為恭敬承事師長,或為看病,或為隨順修和敬業,或為所餘如是等類諸所作事;而心於彼所作事業,不全隨順、不全趣向、不全臨入,唯有速疾令事究竟,還復精勤宴坐寂靜、修諸觀行。若有苾芻、苾芻尼、鄔波索迦、剎帝利、婆羅門等種種異眾共相會遇,雖久雜處,現相語儀;而不相續安立言論,唯樂遠離勤修觀行。又能如是勇猛精進。謂我於今定當趣證所應證得,不應慢緩。何以故?我有多種橫死因緣。所謂身中或風、或熱、或痰發動;或所飲食不正消化,住在身中成宿食病;或為於外蛇蝎、蚰蜒、百足等類諸惡毒蟲之所蛆蠚;或復為人非人類等之所驚恐;因斯夭沒。於如是等諸橫死處恒常思惟,修無常想,住不放逸。由住如是不放逸故;恒自思惟:我之壽命儻得更經七日、六日、五日、四日、三日、二日、一日、一時、半時、須臾、或半須臾、或經食頃、或從入息至於出息、或從出息至於入息,乃至存活經爾所時,於佛聖教精勤作意修習瑜伽,齊爾所時,於佛聖教,我當決定多有所作。如是名為不緩加行。
云何名為無倒加行?謂如善達修瑜伽行諸瑜伽師之所開悟,即如是學,於法、於義不顛倒取,無有我慢,亦不安住自所見取,無邪僻執,於尊教誨終不輕毀。如是名為無倒加行。
云何名為應時加行?謂於時時間修習止相,於時時間修習觀相,於時時間修習舉相,於時時間修習捨相。又能如實了知其止、止相、止時;了知其觀、觀相、觀時;了知其舉、舉相、舉時;了知其捨、捨相、捨時。
云何為止?謂九相心住。能令其心無相、無分別、寂靜、極寂靜、等住寂止、純一無雜,故名為止。
云何止相?謂有二種。一、所緣相,二、因緣相。所緣相者,謂奢摩他品所知事同分影像,是名所緣相。由此所緣,令心寂靜。因緣相者,謂依奢摩他所熏習心,為令後時奢摩他定皆清淨故,修習瑜伽毘鉢舍那所有加行,是名因緣相。
云何止時?謂心掉舉時,或恐掉舉時,是修止時。又依毘鉢舍那所熏習心,為諸尋思之所擾惱及諸事業所擾惱時,是修止時。
云何為觀?謂四行、三門、六事差別所緣觀行。
云何觀相?謂有二種。一、所緣相。二、因緣相。所緣相者,謂毘鉢舍那品所知事同分影像。由此所緣,令慧觀察。因緣相者,謂依毘鉢舍那所熏習心,為令後時毘鉢舍那皆清淨故,修習內心奢摩他定所有加行。
云何觀時?謂心沈沒時,或恐沈沒時,是修觀時。又依奢摩他所熏習心,先應於彼所知事境如實覺了,故於爾時是修觀時。
云何為舉?謂由隨取一種淨妙所緣境界,顯示、勸導、慶慰其心。
云何舉相?謂由淨妙所緣境界,策勵其心,及彼隨順發勤精進。
云何舉時?謂心沈下時,或恐沈下時,是修舉時。
云何為捨?謂於所緣心無染污、心平等性,於止觀品調柔正直任運轉性,及調柔心有堪能性,令心隨與任運作用。
云何捨相?謂由所緣令心上捨,及於所緣不發所有太過精進。
云何捨時?謂於奢摩他、毘鉢舍那品,所有掉舉心已解脫,是修捨時。如是名為應時加行。
云何名為解了加行?謂於如是所說諸相善取、善了。善取了已,欲入定時即便能入,欲住定時即便能住,欲起定時即便能起。或時棄捨諸三摩地所行影像,作意思惟諸不定地所有本性所緣境界。如是名為解了加行。
云何名為無厭足加行?謂於善法無有厭足,修斷無廢,於展轉上、展轉勝處,多住希求。不唯獲得少小靜定,便於中路而生退屈。於餘所作,常有進求。如是名為無厭足加行。
云何名為不捨軛加行?謂於一切所受學處,無穿、無缺;雖見少年顏容端正可愛母邑,而不取相、不取隨好;於食平等;勤修覺寤;少事、少業、少諸散亂;於久所作、久所說等,能自隨憶,令他隨憶。如是等法,說名不捨軛加行。由此諸法,能正隨順心一境性,不捨其軛,令心不散;不令其心馳流外境;不令其心內不調柔。如是名為不捨軛加行。
云何名正加行?謂於所緣數起勝解,數正除遣,是名正加行。如有勤修不淨觀者,數正除遣於諸不淨作意思惟諸不淨相。由隨相行毘鉢舍那而起作意,於所緣境數數除遣,數數現前。
其正除遣,復有五種。一、內攝其心故;二、不念作意故;三、於餘作意故;四、對治作意故;五、無相界作意故。
當知此中,由九相心住、毘鉢舍那而為上首,故名內攝其心。由於最初背一切相,無亂安住,故名不念作意。由緣餘定地境,思惟餘定地,故名於餘作意。由思惟不淨對治於淨,乃至思惟阿那波那念對治尋思,思惟虛空界對治諸色,故名對治作意。由於一切相不作意思惟,於無相界作意思惟,故名無相界作意。
雖遍安立一切所緣正除遣相總有五種,然此義中,正意唯取內攝其心,不念作意。
初修業者始修業時,最初全不於所緣境繫縛其心,或於不淨,或復餘處。唯作是念:我心云何得無散亂、無相、無分別、寂靜、極寂靜、無轉無動、無所希望、離諸作用、於內適悅?如是精勤,於所生起一切外相無所思惟,不念作意;即由如是不念作意,除遣所緣。
彼於其中修習瑜伽,攝受適悅。復行有相、有分別不淨等境。云何而行?謂由隨相行、隨尋思行、隨伺察行毘鉢舍那,行彼境界,而非一向精勤修習毘鉢舍那。還捨觀相,復於所緣思惟止行。由是因緣,彼於爾時,於所緣境不捨、不取。由於所緣止行轉故,不名為捨;即於所緣不作相故,無分別故,不名為取。即由如是內攝其心,除遣所緣。又於其中不取觀相故,於緣無亂;取止行故,而復緣於所知事相。
若於所緣唯數勝解,不數除遣;即不令彼所有勝解後後明淨究竟而轉,不能往趣乃至現觀所知境事。由數勝解、數除遣故,後後勝解展轉明淨究竟而轉,亦能往趣乃至現觀所知境事。
譬如世間畫師弟子,初習畫業,先從師所受所學樣。諦觀諦觀,作彼形相;作已作已,尋即除毀;既除毀已,尋復更作。如如除毀,數數更作,如是如是後後形相轉明、轉淨究竟顯現。如是正學,經歷多時,世共推許為大畫師,或墮師數。若不數除所作形相,即於其上數數重畫,便於形相永無明淨究竟顯期。此中道理,當知亦爾。
若於此境起勝解已,定於此境復正除遣;非於此境正除遣已,定於此境復起勝解。於狹小境起勝解已,即於狹小而正除遣。廣大、無量、當知亦爾。於狹小境正除遣已,或於狹小復起勝解,或於廣大復起勝解,或於無量復起勝解。於其廣大及於無量,當知亦爾。
若諸色法所有相貌影像顯現,當知是麁,變化相似。諸無色法假名為先,如所領受增上力故,影像顯現。如是一切名正加行。
如是九種白品加行,於奢摩他、毘鉢舍那,當知隨順。與是相違九種加行,於奢摩他、毘鉢舍那,當知違逆。如是黑品、白品差別建立加行,有十八種。如是名為心一境性。
云何淨障?謂即如是正修加行諸瑜伽師,由四因緣,能令其心淨除諸障。
何等為四?一、遍知自性故;二、遍知因緣故;三、遍知過患故;四、修習對治故。
云何遍知諸障自性?謂能遍知障有四種。一、怯弱障,二、蓋覆障,三、尋思障,四、自舉障。
怯弱障者,謂於出離及於遠離勤修行時,所有染污思慕、不樂、希望、憂惱。
蓋覆障者,謂貪欲等五蓋。尋思障者,謂欲尋思等染污尋思。自舉障者,謂於少分下劣智見安隱住中,而自高舉。謂我能得,餘則不爾。乃至廣說,如前應知。是名遍知諸障自性。
云何遍知諸障因緣?謂能遍知初怯弱障,有六因緣。一、由先業增上力故,或由疾病所擾惱故,其身羸劣;二、太過加行;三、不修加行;四、初修加行;五、煩惱熾盛;六、於遠離猶未串習。
遍知蓋覆、尋思、自舉障因緣者,謂於隨順蓋覆、尋思及自舉障處所法中,非理作意多分串習,是名蓋覆、尋思、自舉障之因緣。若不作意思惟不淨,而於淨相作意思惟,是名此中非理作意。若不作意思惟慈愍,而於瞋相作意思惟,是名此中非理作意。若不作意思惟明相,而於闇相作意思惟,是名此中非理作意。若不作意思惟奢摩他相,而於親屬、國土、不死,昔所曾更歡娛、戲笑、承奉等事諸惡尋思作意思惟,是名此中非理作意。若不作意思惟緣性緣起,而於三世諸行計我、我所,不如理想作意思惟,是名此中非理作意。
云何遍知諸障過患?謂遍了知此障有故,於其四種未證不證,已證退失。敗壞瑜伽所有加行,有染污住、有苦惱住,自毀、毀他,身壞命終生諸惡趣。是名遍知諸障過患。
云何名為修習對治?謂諸怯弱,總用隨念以為對治。由隨念作意慶悅其心,令諸怯弱已生除遣,未生不生。其身羸劣、太過加行、初修加行,用於精進平等通達以為對治。不修加行,用恭敬聽聞、勤加請問以為對治。煩惱熾盛,用不淨等所緣加行以為對治。若未串習,即用如是思擇方便以為對治。謂我昔於遠離不串習故,今於修習遠離生起怯弱;我若於今不習遠離,於當來世定復如是。故我今者應正思擇,於其遠離捨不喜樂,修習喜樂。
餘蓋覆等非理作意,用彼相違如理作意以為對治。應知是名修習對治。又遍了知諸障自性,是能障礙、是能染污、是黑品攝、是應遠離。能遍了知如是諸障遠離因緣,方可遠離,故應尋求諸障因緣。能遍了知於應遠離不遠離者有何過患,故應尋求諸障過患。既遠離已,更復尋思:如是諸障,云何來世當得不生?故應尋求修習對治。由是因緣,能令其心淨除諸障。
當知此中,由隨順教有眾多故,毘鉢舍那亦有眾多;毘鉢舍那有眾多故,令奢摩他亦有眾多。又復即此毘鉢舍那,由所知境無邊際故,當知其量亦無邊際。謂由三門及六種事,一一無邊品類差別,悟入道理。
正修行者如如毘鉢舍那串習清淨增上力故,增長廣大;如是如是能生身心所有輕安奢摩他品,當知亦得增長廣大。如如身心獲得輕安,如是如是於其所緣心一境性轉得增長;如如於緣心一境性轉復增長,如是如是轉復獲得身心輕安。心一境性、身心輕安,如是二法展轉相依,展轉相屬。身心輕安、心一境性,如是二法若得轉依,方乃究竟。得轉依故,於所知事現量智生。
問:齊何當言究竟獲得不淨觀耶?乃至齊何當言究竟獲得阿那波那念耶?
答:以要言之,修觀行者於不淨觀正加行中,親近、修習、多修習故。若行、若住雖有種種境界現前,雖復觀察所有眾相,而住自性,不由加行,多分不淨行相顯現,非諸淨相。由於不淨善修習故,於能隨順貪欲纏處法,心不趣入、心不愛樂、心不信解,安住於捨,深生厭逆。當於爾時,修觀行者應自了知:我今已得不淨觀,我今已得所修果。齊此名為於不淨觀已得究竟。與此相違,當知名為未得究竟。如不淨觀,如是慈愍、緣性緣起、界差別、阿那波那念念,當知亦爾。
於中差別者,謂多分慈心行相顯現,非瞋恚相。於能隨順瞋恚纏處法,心不趣入,乃至廣說。多分無常、苦、空、無我行相顯現,非彼常、樂、身見俱行愚癡行相。於能隨順愚癡纏處法,心不趣入,乃至廣說。多分種種界性、非一界性身聚差別相想顯現,非身聚想。於能隨順憍慢纏處法,心不趣入,乃至廣說。多分內寂靜想、奢摩他想顯現,非戲論想。於能隨順尋思纏處法,心不趣入,乃至廣說。
問:齊何當言奢摩他毘鉢舍那二種和合平等俱轉?由此說名雙運轉道。
答:若有獲得九相心住中第九相心住,謂三摩呬多。彼用如是圓滿三摩地為所依止,於法觀中修增上慧。彼於爾時,由法觀故,任運轉道,無功用轉,不由加行,毘鉢舍那清淨鮮白,隨奢摩他調柔攝受,如奢摩他道攝受而轉。齊此名為奢摩他、毘鉢舍那二種和合平等俱轉。由此名為奢摩他、毘鉢舍那雙運轉道。
中嗢柁南曰:
相、尋思、伺察,隨行有三門。
義、事、相、品、時、理,六事差別。
初相應加行,次串習、無緩、
無顛倒、應時、解了、無厭足、
不棄捨善軛,最後正加行,
是九應當知,有二品差別。
知自性、因緣,見彼諸過患,
正修習對治,令障得清淨。
云何修作意?謂初修業者始修業時,於如是所安立普遍相中,由一境性及淨諸障,離邪加行,學正加行。彼應最初作如是念:我今為證心一境性及斷喜樂,當勤修習四種作意。
何等為四?一、調練心作意,二、滋潤心作意,三、生輕安作意,四、淨智見作意。
云何調練心作意?謂由此作意,於可厭患法令心厭離,是名調練心作意。
云何滋潤心作意?謂由此作意,於可欣尚法令心欣樂,是名滋潤心作意。
云何生輕安作意?謂由此作意,於時時間,於可厭法令心厭離;於時時間,於可欣法令心欣樂已;安住內寂靜、無相、無分別中,一境念轉。由是因緣,對治一切身心麁重,能令一切身心適悅,生起一切身心輕安。是名生輕安作意。
云何淨智見作意?謂由此作意,於時時間,即用如是內心寂靜為所依止,由內靜心數數加行,於法觀中修增上慧,是名淨智見作意。彼修行者,於時時間,於可厭法令心厭離;如是於漏及漏處法,能令其心生熱、等熱,生厭、等厭。
何等名為可厭患處?略有四種可厭患處。謂自衰損及他衰損,現在會遇正現前時,如理作意數思惟故,成可厭處。若自興盛及他興盛,過去盡滅離變壞時,如理作意數思惟故,成可厭處。即彼行者,於時時間,於可欣法令心欣樂;如是於彼生欣樂故,能令其心極成津潤,融適澄淨。
何等名為可欣尚處?略有三種可欣尚處。一者、三寶;二者、學處清淨、尸羅清淨;三者、於自所證差別,深生信解,心無怯弱。云何隨念三寶,令心欣樂?謂作是念:我今善得如是大利,謂蒙如來應正等覺為我大師。我今善得如是大利,謂善說法毘柰耶中,我得出家。我今善得如是大利,謂我與諸具戒、具德、忍辱、柔和、成賢善法同梵行者共為法侶。我今當得賢善命終、賢善殞沒,當得賢善趣於後世。如是名為隨念三寶,令心欣樂。云何隨念學處清淨、尸羅清淨,令心欣樂?謂作是念:我今善得如是大利,謂於如來應正等覺大師、善說法毘柰耶、善修正行聲聞眾中,我得與彼同梵行者,同戒、同學、同修慈仁身語意業、同其所見、同所受用。如是名為隨念學處清淨、尸羅清淨,令心欣樂。謂無悔為先,發生歡喜。云何於自所證差別,深生信解,心無怯弱處,令心欣樂?謂作是念:我今有力、有所堪能,尸羅清淨,堪為法器。得與如是同梵行者同清淨戒,得與有智正至善士同其所見,我有堪能精勤修習如是正行。於現法中,能得未得、能觸未觸、能證未證。由是令心生大歡喜。如是名為於自所證差別,深生信解,心無怯弱處,令心欣樂。又由前後勇猛精進,已得安住所證差別;由隨念此,復於後時所證差別,深生信解,令心欣樂。是名異門。
彼修行者,於可厭法調練其心,於能隨順諸漏處法令心不向,違逆、棄背、離隔而住;於可欣法悅潤其心,於出、於離所生諸法有親愛故,令心趣向,附著、喜樂、和合而住。如是彼心由厭、由欣二種行相,背諸黑品,向諸白品,易脫而轉。其心如是背諸黑品,由調練心作意故。向諸白品,由滋潤心作意故。於時時間,依奢摩他內攝持心,由生輕安作意故。於時時間,於法思擇、最極思擇、周遍尋思、周遍伺察,由淨智見作意故。如是彼心,於時時間,為奢摩他、毘鉢舍那之所攝受,堪能與彼一切行相、一切功德作攝受因,經歷彼彼日夜、剎那、臘縛、須臾,逮得勝進。
譬如黠慧鍛金銀師,或彼弟子,於時時間燒鍊金銀,令其棄捨一切垢穢;於時時間投清冷水,令於彼彼莊嚴具業,有所堪任,調柔隨順。於是黠慧鍛金銀師,或彼弟子,以其相似妙工巧智善了知已,用作業具,隨其所樂莊嚴具中,種種轉變。
如是勤修瑜伽行者,為令其心棄背貪等一切垢穢,及令棄背染污憂惱,於可厭法深生厭離;為令趣向所有清淨善品喜樂,於可欣法發生欣樂。於是行者,隨於彼彼欲自安立,或奢摩他品、或毘鉢舍那品,即於彼彼能善親附,能善和合,無轉無動;隨其所樂種種義中,如所信解,皆能成辦。
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
止觀體相立了,這一葉講「修中的手眼」:白品九種加行(怎麼下功才令心速疾得定)·應時加行裡的止觀舉捨四行·正加行的數除數遣(畫師弟子喻)→ 收於「如是名為心一境性」;接著淨障(科7:四因緣淨除四障)·止觀雙運道;末了中嗢柁南總攝,再起修作意(科8)的四種作意與鍛金師喻。逐句依玄奘譯本今語,名相留舊,不加義理、不引論、不註梵;論文壓縮處以〔〕補回。
白品九種加行:九種下功的對與不對
其次,這當中有九種「白品所攝加行」(順修的九種下功法);與這相違的,就是九種黑品所攝加行。哪九種白品加行?一相應加行、二串習加行、三無倒加行、四不緩加行、五應時加行、六解了加行、七無厭足加行、八不捨軛加行、九正加行。由這九種白品加行,能令心速疾得定、令三摩地轉更勝進;又由此,於所應往的地、所應得的果,速疾能往能得,沒有稽遲。黑品九加行則相反——不能令心速疾得定、不令三摩地勝進,於所應往所應得極大稽遲,不能速疾往得。
- 相應加行:貪行者應於不淨安住其心、瞋行者於慈愍、癡行者於緣起、憍慢行者於界差別、尋思行者於阿那波那念安住其心;等分行者或薄塵行者,隨所樂攀緣一境安住其心,勤修加行。這樣名為相應加行。
- 串習加行:於奢摩他、毘鉢舍那已曾數習乃至少分,不是一切都還在初修。為什麼?初修業者雖於相應所緣勤修加行,但諸蓋數數現行、身心麁重,所以不能令心速疾得定。這樣名為串習加行。
- 不緩加行:以無間方便、殷重方便勤修觀行。若從定出——或為乞食、恭敬承事師長、看病、隨順修和敬業、或其餘所作事——心對那些事不全隨順、不全趣向、不全臨入,只求速令事究竟,便回來精勤宴坐寂靜修觀。與比丘、比丘尼、鄔波索迦、剎帝利、婆羅門等種種異眾相遇,雖久雜處、現相寒暄,卻不接著安立言論,唯樂遠離勤修觀行。又能勇猛精進——想:我今定當趣證所應證得,不應慢緩。為什麼?我有多種橫死因緣:身中風、熱、痰發動,或飲食不消成宿食病,或被蛇蝎蚰蜒百足等惡毒蟲所蛆螫(啃咬螫刺),或被人非人類所驚恐,因此夭沒。於這些橫死處恒常思惟、修無常想、住不放逸。由住不放逸,恒自思惟:我這壽命,倘能再經七日、六日、五日、四日、三日、二日、一日、一時、半時、須臾、半須臾、或一頓飯頃、或從入息到出息、或從出息到入息,只要能活這麼點時候,就要於佛聖教精勤作意修習瑜伽,這麼點時候裡,我於佛聖教定要多有所作。這樣名為不緩加行。
- 無倒加行:如善達瑜伽行的諸瑜伽師所開示的,就如是學——於法、於義不顛倒取,無我慢,不安住自己的見取,無邪僻執,對尊長教誨終不輕毀。這樣名為無倒加行。
- 應時加行:於時時間修止相、修觀相、修舉相、修捨相;又能如實了知止與止相止時、觀與觀相觀時、舉與舉相舉時、捨與捨相捨時。〔下別明止觀舉捨四行——〕
- 止:就是九相心住,能令心無相、無分別、寂靜、極寂靜、等住寂止、純一無雜,故名為止。止相有二:所緣相(奢摩他品所知事同分影像,由此令心寂靜)、因緣相(依奢摩他所熏習的心,為令後時奢摩他定清淨而修的毘鉢舍那加行)。止時:心掉舉時、或恐掉舉時,是修止時;又依毘鉢舍那所熏習的心,被尋思及事業擾惱時,是修止時。
- 觀:就是四行、三門、六事差別所緣的觀行。觀相有二:所緣相(毘鉢舍那品所知事同分影像,由此令慧觀察)、因緣相(依毘鉢舍那所熏習的心,為令後時毘鉢舍那清淨而修的奢摩他加行)。觀時:心沈沒時、或恐沈沒時,是修觀時;又依奢摩他所熏習的心,先應於所知事如實覺了,那時是修觀時。
- 舉:由隨取一種淨妙所緣,顯示、勸導、慶慰其心。舉相:由淨妙所緣策勵其心、及隨順發勤精進。舉時:心沈下時、或恐沈下時,是修舉時。
- 捨:於所緣心無染污、心平等性,於止觀品調柔正直任運轉性,及調柔心有堪能性,令心隨與任運作用。捨相:由所緣令心上捨,及於所緣不發太過精進。捨時:於止觀品所有掉舉心已解脫,是修捨時。〔以上名應時加行。〕
- 解了加行:於上說諸相善取善了;善取了後,欲入定即能入、欲住定即能住、欲起定即能起;或時棄捨諸三摩地所行影像,作意思惟諸不定地的本性所緣境界。這樣名為解了加行。
- 無厭足加行:於善法無有厭足,修斷無廢,於展轉上、展轉勝處多住希求;不只得了少小靜定就在中路退屈,於其餘所作常有進求。這樣名為無厭足加行。
- 不捨軛加行:於一切所受學處無穿、無缺;雖見少年顏容端正可愛的女子,而不取相、不取隨好;於食平等;勤修覺寤;少事、少業、少散亂;於久所作、久所說等,能自隨憶、令他隨憶。由這些法能正隨順心一境性,不捨其軛(不卸下擔子)、令心不散、不馳外境、內不僵硬。這樣名為不捨軛加行。
- 正加行:於所緣數數起勝解、數數正除遣。如勤修不淨觀者,數數除遣、又數數現前那不淨作意所思惟的不淨相;由隨相行毘鉢舍那起作意,於所緣數數除遣、數數現前。這樣名為正加行。
正除遣的五種,與「而行」
那「正除遣」又有五種:一內攝其心、二不念作意、三於餘作意、四對治作意、五無相界作意。當中——由九相心住、毘鉢舍那為上首,名「內攝其心」;由最初背一切相、無亂安住,名「不念作意」;由緣其餘定地的境、思惟其餘定地,名「於餘作意」;由思惟不淨對治淨,乃至思惟阿那波那念對治尋思、思惟虛空界對治諸色,名「對治作意」;由一切相不作意思惟、於無相界作意思惟,名「無相界作意」。雖然遍立的正除遣相總有五種,但這裡正取的,唯是「內攝其心」與「不念作意」二種。
初修業者剛起修時,最初全不於所緣境繫縛其心(不論不淨或別處),只作這念:我心怎麼才能得無散亂、無相、無分別、寂靜、極寂靜、無轉無動、無所希望、離諸作用、於內適悅?這樣精勤,對所生起的一切外相無所思惟,名「不念作意」;即由這不念作意,除遣所緣。
他在這裡修瑜伽、攝受適悅,又行「有相、有分別」的不淨等境。怎麼「而行」?就是由隨相行、隨尋思行、隨伺察行毘鉢舍那行那境界,卻不一向只精勤毘鉢舍那;還捨下觀相,又於所緣思惟止行。由此,他那時於所緣境「不捨、不取」——由於緣上止行轉故,不名為捨;於緣上不作相、無分別故,不名為取。即由這樣內攝其心、除遣所緣;又於其中不取觀相故,於緣無亂;取止行故,又緣於所知事相。
若於所緣只一味起勝解、不數除遣,就不能令所有勝解後後明淨究竟而轉,不能往趣乃至現觀所知境事;由數起勝解、數正除遣,後後勝解展轉明淨究竟而轉,也能往趣乃至現觀所知境事。
畫師弟子喻:譬如世間畫師的弟子初習畫業,先從師處受所學的樣本,諦觀諦觀、作那形相;作完又作完,隨即除毀;既除毀,又再作。如此除毀、數數更作,那後後的形相就轉明、轉淨、究竟顯現;這樣正學,經歷多時,世人共推他為大畫師、或入師之列。若不數除所作形相、只在其上數數重畫,那形相永無明淨究竟可期。修觀的道理也是這樣。
若於這境起了勝解,一定要於這境再正除遣;不是於這境正除遣了,就一定再於這境起勝解。於狹小境起勝解了,就於狹小正除遣;廣大、無量也如此。於狹小境正除遣了,或於狹小、或於廣大、或於無量再起勝解;廣大無量也如此。又:若諸色法的相貌影像顯現,當知是麁、是變化相似;諸無色法以假名為先,如所領受的增上力,影像顯現。這一切名正加行。
這九種白品加行,於奢摩他、毘鉢舍那當知是隨順的;與它相違的九種加行,於奢摩他毘鉢舍那當知是違逆的。這樣黑品、白品差別建立的加行,共有十八種。如是名為心一境性。〔科6 一境性,至此結。〕
淨障:四因緣淨除四障
什麼是淨障?就是這樣正修加行的諸瑜伽師,由四因緣能令其心淨除諸障。哪四因緣?一遍知自性、二遍知因緣、三遍知過患、四修習對治。
也就是說,先遍知障的自性,再遍知障生起的因緣,又遍知不遠離它的過患,最後實際修習相應對治;四者具足,才能令心淨除諸障。
遍知諸障自性:能遍知障有四種——一怯弱障、二蓋覆障、三尋思障、四自舉障。怯弱障,是於出離及遠離勤修行時,所有染污的思慕、不樂、希望、憂惱。蓋覆障,就是貪欲等五蓋。尋思障,就是欲尋思等染污尋思。自舉障,是於少分下劣的智見安隱住中而自高舉——說「我能得,別人就不能」,乃至廣說如前。
逐障收束:勤修出離、遠離時所起的染污思慕、不樂、希望、憂惱,名為怯弱障;貪欲等五蓋,名為蓋覆障;欲尋思等染污尋思,名為尋思障;住於少分下劣智見而自高舉,以為「我能得,別人不能」,名為自舉障。這樣名為遍知諸障自性。
遍知諸障因緣:初「怯弱障」有六因緣——一由先業增上力、或疾病擾惱故身羸劣,二太過加行,三不修加行,四初修加行,五煩惱熾盛,六於遠離猶未串習。蓋覆、尋思、自舉三障的因緣,是於隨順這三障的法中「非理作意」多分串習。什麼是這裡的非理作意?不作意思惟不淨、而於淨相作意思惟;不作意思惟慈愍、而於瞋相作意思惟;不作意思惟明相、而於闇相作意思惟;不作意思惟奢摩他相、而於親屬國土不死、昔曾經歷的歡娛戲笑承奉等惡尋思作意思惟;不作意思惟緣性緣起、而於三世諸行計我我所、不如理想作意思惟——這些都是非理作意。
逐項說:不思惟不淨、反而思惟淨相,這在此處名為非理作意;不思惟慈愍、反而思惟瞋相,這在此處名為非理作意;不思惟明相、反而思惟闇相,這在此處名為非理作意;不思惟奢摩他相、反而思惟親屬、國土、不死及往昔歡娛戲笑承奉等惡尋思,這在此處名為非理作意;不思惟緣性緣起、反而於三世諸行計度我及我所,作不如理想,這在此處也名為非理作意。
遍知諸障過患:遍知這障有故,於那四種「未證不證、已證退失」,敗壞瑜伽加行,有染污住、有苦惱住,自毀毀他,身壞命終生諸惡趣。
修習對治:諸「怯弱」,總用隨念為對治——由隨念作意慶悅其心,令已生怯弱除遣、未生不生。身羸劣、太過加行、初修加行,用「精進平等通達」為對治。不修加行,用恭敬聽聞、勤加請問為對治。煩惱熾盛,用不淨等所緣加行為對治。若未串習,就用這樣的思擇方便為對治——想:我昔於遠離不串習,故今修遠離生怯弱;我若今不習遠離,當來世定又如此,所以我今應正思擇,對遠離捨去不喜樂、修習喜樂。其餘蓋覆等的非理作意,用與它相違的如理作意為對治。
所以,怯弱總由隨念作意慶悅其心來對治,使已生的除去、未生的不生;身體羸劣、加行太過與初修加行,由平等通達精進來對治;不修加行,由恭敬聽聞、勤加請問來對治;煩惱熾盛,由不淨等所緣加行來對治;遠離尚未串習,由思擇今生若仍不習、來世必又如此而捨不喜樂、修習喜樂來對治;其餘蓋覆、尋思、自舉所依的非理作意,則一一由相違的如理作意來對治。這樣名為修習對治。 又:遍知諸障自性「是能障礙、能染污、黑品攝、應遠離」;遍知諸障遠離的因緣,方可遠離,故應尋求諸障因緣;遍知「於應遠離而不遠離有何過患」,故應尋求諸障過患;既遠離了,又尋思「這些障怎麼來世當得不生」,故應尋求修習對治。由這因緣,能令其心淨除諸障。
止觀眾多·展轉相依·雙運轉道
要知道,由隨順教有眾多,毘鉢舍那也有眾多;毘鉢舍那眾多,令奢摩他也眾多。又這毘鉢舍那,由所知境無邊際,當知其量也無邊際——由三門及六種事,一一無邊品類差別,悟入道理。
正修行者:如他的毘鉢舍那串習清淨的增上力越強,就越增長廣大;如此,能生身心的奢摩他品輕安也越增長廣大。如身心越得輕安,於所緣的心一境性就越增長;心一境性越增長,又越獲得身心輕安。心一境性、身心輕安二法,展轉相依、展轉相屬;這二法若得「轉依」,方才究竟。得轉依故,於所知事生起「現量智」。
問:到什麼地步才說「究竟獲得不淨觀」?乃至到什麼地步才說「究竟獲得阿那波那念」?
答:要言之,修觀者於不淨觀的正加行中,親近、修習、多修習故,若行若住雖有種種境界現前、雖觀察所有眾相,而住自性、不由加行,多分都是不淨行相顯現、不是諸淨相;由於不淨善修習,對能隨順貪欲纏處的法,心不趣入、不愛樂、不信解,安住於捨、深生厭逆。那時修觀者應自了知:我今已得不淨觀、已得所修果——這才名為於不淨觀已得究竟;與此相違,名未得究竟。不淨觀如此,慈愍、緣性緣起、界差別、阿那波那念也如此。其中差別:多分慈心行相顯現、非瞋恚相;對能隨順瞋恚纏處的法,心不趣入、不愛樂、不信解,安住於捨、深生厭逆。多分無常、苦、空、無我行相顯現,不是常、樂、身見俱行的愚癡行相;對隨順愚癡纏處法,心也不趣入、不愛樂、不信解,安住於捨、深生厭逆。多分種種界性、非一界性的身聚差別相想顯現,不是身聚想;對隨順憍慢纏處法,心同樣不趣入、不愛樂、不信解,安住於捨、深生厭逆。多分內寂靜想、奢摩他想顯現,不是戲論想;對隨順尋思纏處法,心同樣不趣入、不愛樂、不信解,安住於捨、深生厭逆。
問:到什麼地步才說「奢摩他、毘鉢舍那二種和合平等俱轉」——由此名為雙運轉道?
答:若已獲得九相心住中的第九相心住(謂三摩呬多),他用這圓滿三摩地為所依止,於法觀中修增上慧;那時由法觀故,任運轉道、無功用轉、不由加行,毘鉢舍那清淨鮮白,隨奢摩他調柔攝受、如奢摩他道攝受而轉——到這地步,名為奢摩他、毘鉢舍那二種和合平等俱轉,由此名為雙運轉道。
中嗢柁南
中嗢柁南說:
相、尋思、伺察,隨行有三門。
義、事、相、品、時、理,六事差別。
初相應加行,次串習、無緩、
無顛倒、應時、解了、無厭足、
不棄捨善軛,最後正加行,
是九應當知,有二品差別。
知自性、因緣,見彼諸過患,
正修習對治,令障得清淨。
修作意:四種作意(科8 起)
什麼是修作意?就是初修業者剛起修時,於這樣所安立的普遍相中,由心一境性及淨諸障,離邪加行、學正加行。他應最初作這念:我今為證心一境性及斷喜樂,當勤修習四種作意。哪四種?一調練心作意、二滋潤心作意、三生輕安作意、四淨智見作意。
- 調練心作意:由此作意,於可厭患的法令心厭離。這名調練心作意。
- 滋潤心作意:由此作意,於可欣尚的法令心欣樂。這名滋潤心作意。
- 生輕安作意:由此作意,於時時間於可厭法令心厭離、於時時間於可欣法令心欣樂後,安住內寂靜、無相、無分別中,一境念轉;由此對治一切身心麁重,能令一切身心適悅、生起一切身心輕安。這名生輕安作意。
- 淨智見作意:由此作意,於時時間即用這內心寂靜為所依止,由內靜心數數加行,於法觀中修增上慧;修行者於時時間於可厭法令心厭離,如此於漏及漏處法,能令心生熱、等熱,生厭、等厭。這名淨智見作意。
什麼名「可厭患處」?略有四種:自衰損及他衰損正現前時,如理作意數思惟,成可厭處;自興盛及他興盛在過去盡滅離變壞時,如理作意數思惟,成可厭處。修行者於時時間於可欣法令心欣樂,由生欣樂,能令心極成津潤、融適澄淨。
什麼名「可欣尚處」?略有三種:一三寶、二學處清淨尸羅清淨、三於自所證差別深生信解心無怯弱。 隨念三寶令心欣樂:作這念——我今善得大利,蒙如來應正等覺為我大師;我今善得大利,於善說法毘柰耶中我得出家;我今善得大利,我與諸具戒具德、忍辱柔和、成賢善法的同梵行者共為法侶;我當得賢善命終、賢善殞沒、賢善趣於後世。 隨念學處清淨尸羅清淨令心欣樂:作這念——我今善得大利,於如來大師、善說法毘柰耶、善修正行的聲聞眾中,我得與同梵行者同戒、同學、同修慈仁身語意業、同所見、同所受用;這是「無悔為先,發生歡喜」。這就名為隨念學處清淨、尸羅清淨,令心欣樂。 於自所證差別深生信解、心無怯弱令心欣樂:作這念——我今有力、有所堪能,尸羅清淨、堪為法器,得與同梵行者同清淨戒、與有智正至善士同所見,我有堪能精勤修習如是正行,於現法中能得未得、能觸未觸、能證未證,由此令心生大歡喜。這就名為於自所證差別深生信解、心無怯弱之處,令心欣樂。又由前後勇猛精進,已得安住所證差別;由隨念此,又於後時所證差別深生信解,令心欣樂(這是「異門」的說法)。
那修行者,於可厭法調練其心,對能隨順諸漏處的法令心不向,違逆、棄背、離隔而住;於可欣法悅潤其心,對出、離所生諸法有親愛故,令心趣向、附著、喜樂、和合而住。如此他的心由「厭」「欣」二種行相,背諸黑品、向諸白品,輕易脫轉。心背黑品,由調練心作意;向白品,由滋潤心作意;於時時間依奢摩他內攝持心,由生輕安作意;於時時間於法思擇、最極思擇、周遍尋思、周遍伺察,由淨智見作意。如此他的心於時時間為奢摩他毘鉢舍那所攝受,堪能與一切行相、一切功德作攝受因,經歷日夜、剎那、臘縛、須臾,漸得勝進。
鍛金師喻:譬如有智巧的鍛金銀師、或他的弟子,於時時間燒鍊金銀、令它棄捨一切垢穢;於時時間投入清冷水,令它對種種莊嚴具的造作有所堪任、調柔隨順;於是這鍛金師或弟子,以相似的妙工巧智善了知後,用它作業具,隨所樂的莊嚴具中種種轉變。如此勤修瑜伽的行者,為令心棄背貪等一切垢穢、及棄背染污憂惱,於可厭法深生厭離;為令趣向所有清淨善品喜樂,於可欣法發生欣樂。於是行者,隨於那欲自安立的奢摩他品或毘鉢舍那品,便能善親附、善和合、無轉無動,隨所樂的種種義中如所信解,皆能成辦。
With the essence and character of tranquillity-and-insight now set up, this leaf teaches the "working hand and eye of cultivation": the nine preparatory efforts subsumed under the bright class (how to apply oneself so that the mind swiftly gains concentration) · within timely preparatory effort, the four practices of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity · the repeated resolving and repeated clearing-away of correct preparatory effort (the simile of the painter's apprentice) → gathered into "such is what is called one-pointedness of mind"; then purifying the obstructions (sub-section 7: purging the four obstructions by four causal factors) · the path of the yoked working of tranquillity and insight; and at the close, the middle uddāna gathers all together, and then the cultivation of attention (sub-section 8) is raised — the four kinds of attention and the simile of the goldsmith. Every word follows Xuanzang's translation in today's language; the technical names are kept in their old form; no doctrinal exposition is added, no treatise is cited, no Sanskrit is annotated; where the treatise-text is compressed, it is filled back in with 〔brackets〕.
The Nine Preparatory Efforts of the Bright Class: the Right and Wrong of the Nine Ways of Applying Oneself
Further, within this there are nine "preparatory efforts subsumed under the bright class" (the nine methods of applying oneself in accord with cultivation); and contrary to these are the nine preparatory efforts subsumed under the dark class. Which nine bright-class preparatory efforts? First, corresponding preparatory effort; second, repeated-practice preparatory effort; third, unerring preparatory effort; fourth, unslackened preparatory effort; fifth, timely preparatory effort; sixth, understanding preparatory effort; seventh, insatiable preparatory effort; eighth, yoke-not-cast-off preparatory effort; ninth, correct preparatory effort. By these nine bright-class preparatory efforts, one is able to make the mind swiftly gain concentration and to make the meditative concentration advance ever more excellently; and by these, too, one is able to reach swiftly the ground that should be reached and to gain swiftly the fruit that should be gained, without delay. The nine dark-class preparatory efforts are the reverse — they cannot make the mind swiftly gain concentration, do not make the meditative concentration advance, and with respect to what should be reached and what should be gained there is extreme delay, no swift reaching and gaining.
- Corresponding preparatory effort: one who acts from greed should settle his mind on the impure; one who acts from hatred, on loving-kindness; one who acts from delusion, on dependent origination; one who acts from conceit, on the difference of the elements; one who acts from discursive thought, on mindfulness of in-breath and out-breath. One of balanced conduct, or one of thin dust, may — as he takes pleasure in it — take some single object as support and settle his mind upon it, diligently cultivating preparatory effort. This is called corresponding preparatory effort.
- Repeated-practice preparatory effort: with tranquillity and insight one has already practiced repeatedly, if only in some small part — it is not that everything is still in first cultivation. Why? Even though one who is at first cultivating the work diligently cultivates preparatory effort upon the corresponding object, the several hindrances are present again and again, and body and mind are coarse and heavy, and so he cannot make the mind swiftly gain concentration. This is called repeated-practice preparatory effort.
- Unslackened preparatory effort: with uninterrupted means and with earnest means one diligently cultivates the practice of insight. If one comes out of concentration — whether to beg for food, to reverently attend and serve one's teacher, to nurse the sick, to comply with the practice of the duties of harmony and respect, or for any other thing to be done — one's mind does not wholly comply with, does not wholly turn toward, does not wholly enter into those matters; one only seeks to bring the matter swiftly to its end, and then returns to sit diligently in stillness and quiet, cultivating insight. When one meets with various assorted crowds — monks, nuns, laymen (upāsaka), warriors, brahmins, and so on — even after long mingling, though one shows the marks of exchanging greetings, one does not then set up any discourse, but only delights in seclusion and diligently cultivates the practice of insight. And one is able to be valiant and vigorous, thinking: I must now surely proceed to realize what should be realized; I ought not to be slow and slack. Why? I have many causes and conditions of sudden death: within this body, the disturbance of wind, heat, and phlegm; or food and drink not digested becoming the disease of undigested food; or being gnawed and stung (bitten, stung, and pierced) by snakes, scorpions, centipedes, millipedes, and other venomous vermin; or being terrified by humans or non-humans, and thereby dying untimely. Concerning these places of sudden death one should constantly reflect, cultivate the perception of impermanence, and abide in non-heedlessness. By abiding in non-heedlessness, one constantly reflects thus: this lifespan of mine — should it be able to last yet seven days, six days, five days, four days, three days, two days, one day, one hour, half an hour, a moment, half a moment, or the space of a single meal, or from an in-breath to an out-breath, or from an out-breath to an in-breath — for just so long as I can live, I will diligently direct attention upon the Buddha's holy teaching and cultivate yoga; in just so long a span, I must surely accomplish much in the Buddha's holy teaching. This is called unslackened preparatory effort.
- Unerring preparatory effort: as the yoga practitioners well versed in the practice of yoga instruct, just so one learns — taking neither dharma nor meaning in an inverted way, without self-conceit, not settling into one's own dogmatic grasping of views, without deviant clinging, and never slighting or demeaning the instruction of one's elders. This is called unerring preparatory effort.
- Timely preparatory effort: at each and every moment one cultivates the mark of tranquillity, cultivates the mark of insight, cultivates the mark of exertion, cultivates the mark of equanimity; and one is able to know as it really is: tranquillity, the mark of tranquillity, and the time for tranquillity; insight, the mark of insight, and the time for insight; exertion, the mark of exertion, and the time for exertion; equanimity, the mark of equanimity, and the time for equanimity. 〔What follows separately clarifies the four practices of tranquillity, insight, exertion, and equanimity —〕
- Tranquillity: this is the nine marks of mental settling, able to make the mind markless, non-discriminating, quieted, utterly quieted, evenly abiding in stilled tranquillity, unmixedly pure and one — hence it is named tranquillity. The mark of tranquillity is twofold: the object-mark (the image corresponding in kind to the thing known within the class of tranquillity, whereby the mind is quieted) and the causal-condition-mark (the practice of insight cultivated, in dependence on a mind perfumed by tranquillity, so as to purify the tranquillity-concentration for a later time). The time for tranquillity: when the mind is agitated, or when one fears agitation, this is the time to cultivate tranquillity; and when the mind perfumed by insight is troubled by discursive thought and by activities, this is the time to cultivate tranquillity.
- Insight: this is the practice of insight upon objects distinguished by the four practices, the three gateways, and the six matters. The mark of insight is twofold: the object-mark (the image corresponding in kind to the thing known within the class of insight, whereby wisdom examines) and the causal-condition-mark (the practice of tranquillity cultivated, in dependence on a mind perfumed by insight, so as to purify the insight for a later time). The time for insight: when the mind sinks, or when one fears sinking, this is the time to cultivate insight; and in dependence on a mind perfumed by tranquillity, when one should first understand the thing known as it really is, that is the time to cultivate insight.
- Exertion: by taking up some one pure and excellent object, one displays, urges on, and gladdens one's mind. The mark of exertion: by a pure and excellent object one spurs on one's mind, and one accordingly gives rise to diligent vigor. The time for exertion: when the mind sinks down, or when one fears it will sink down, this is the time to cultivate exertion.
- Equanimity: toward the object the mind is undefiled and of an even nature; within the class of tranquillity and insight there is the nature of being supple, upright, and spontaneously turning, and the mind, being supple, has capability, so that one lets the mind go along in spontaneous operation. The mark of equanimity: by the object one lets the mind be released above, and one does not put forth excessive vigor upon the object. The time for equanimity: when the agitated mind within the class of tranquillity and insight has been liberated, this is the time to cultivate equanimity. 〔The above is named timely preparatory effort.〕
- Understanding preparatory effort: with respect to the several marks spoken of above, one takes them well and understands them well; and having taken and understood them well, when one wishes to enter concentration one can enter, when one wishes to abide in concentration one can abide, when one wishes to rise from concentration one can rise; or at times one casts off the images ranged over in the several meditative concentrations and directs one's attention to reflect upon the essential objects proper to the several non-concentrated grounds. This is called understanding preparatory effort.
- Insatiable preparatory effort: with respect to wholesome dharmas one has no satiety, one cultivates cutting-off without letting it lapse, and in the successively higher, successively more excellent places one dwells much in aspiration; not merely gaining some small tranquil concentration does one shrink back midway on the road, but with respect to the rest that should be done one constantly has advancing aspiration. This is called insatiable preparatory effort.
- Yoke-not-cast-off preparatory effort: with respect to all the points of training one has received, there is no breach and no lack; though one sees a young woman of upright and lovely countenance, one does not take up her mark and does not take up her fine features; toward food one is even-minded; one diligently cultivates wakefulness; one has few affairs, few undertakings, little distraction; with respect to what was long ago done and long ago said, one can call it back to oneself and cause others to call it back. By these dharmas one can rightly accord with one-pointedness of mind, not casting off its yoke (not laying down the load), keeping the mind from scattering, from racing after external objects, from becoming inwardly stiff. This is called yoke-not-cast-off preparatory effort.
- Correct preparatory effort: with respect to the object one again and again arouses resolute conviction, and again and again correctly clears it away. As one who diligently cultivates the contemplation of the impure again and again clears away, and again and again brings before himself, that impure mark reflected upon by the impure attention; by the attention aroused through insight that practices in accordance with the mark, with respect to the object one again and again clears away and again and again brings before oneself. This is called correct preparatory effort.
The Five Kinds of Correct Clearing-Away, and "How One Practices"
That "correct clearing-away" is again of five kinds: first, inwardly gathering one's mind; second, the attention of not-minding; third, attention upon another [ground]; fourth, the attention of counteraction; fifth, the attention of the markless element. Among these — by the nine marks of mental settling with insight at the head, it is named "inwardly gathering one's mind"; by turning one's back at the very outset upon all marks and abiding without disorder, it is named "the attention of not-minding"; by taking as object the domains of the other meditative grounds and reflecting upon the other meditative grounds, it is named "attention upon another"; by reflecting on the impure as a counteraction to the pure, and so on down to reflecting on mindfulness of in-breath and out-breath as a counteraction to discursive thought, and reflecting on the element of empty space as a counteraction to the several materialities, it is named "the attention of counteraction"; by not directing attention or reflection upon any mark and by directing attention and reflection upon the markless element, it is named "the attention of the markless element." Although the correct clearing-away marks, universally established, come to five kinds in all, what is here properly taken up is only the two kinds "inwardly gathering one's mind" and "the attention of not-minding."
When one who is at first cultivating the work first sets to cultivation, at the very outset he does not at all bind his mind upon the object-domain (whether the impure or somewhere else), but makes only this thought: how might my mind gain being unscattered, markless, non-discriminating, quieted, utterly quieted, unturning and unmoving, without any longing, apart from all operations, inwardly at ease? Being thus diligent, with respect to all the external marks that arise he reflects upon nothing — this is named "the attention of not-minding"; and it is by this attention of not-minding that he clears away the object.
Here he cultivates yoga and takes up ease, and also practices the "having-mark, having-discrimination" objects — the impure and the like. How does he "practice"? It is that by the insight that practices in accordance with the mark, in accordance with discursive thought, in accordance with examination, he practices that domain, yet does not one-sidedly put forth diligence only in insight; he also lays down the mark of insight, and again reflects upon the practice of tranquillity with respect to the object. By this, at that time, with respect to the object-domain he "neither casts off nor takes up" — because the practice of tranquillity turns upon the object, it is not named casting-off; because upon the object he makes no mark and does not discriminate, it is not named taking-up. It is precisely by thus inwardly gathering his mind that he clears away the object; and because within this he does not take up the mark of insight, with respect to the object there is no disorder; and because he takes up the practice of tranquillity, he takes the thing known as his object-mark once more.
If with respect to the object one merely arouses resolute conviction and does not again and again clear it away, then one cannot make all the resolute convictions turn ever after clearer, purer, and more thoroughgoing, and cannot proceed onward, even to the direct realization of the object-thing known; by again and again arousing resolute conviction and again and again correctly clearing away, the later and later resolute convictions turn successively clearer, purer, and more thoroughgoing, and one can also proceed onward, even to the direct realization of the object-thing known.
The simile of the painter's apprentice: it is like the apprentice of a painter in the world, who at first learns the work of painting — he first receives from his master the model to be learned, contemplates it and contemplates it, and makes that shape; having made it and made it, he straightaway wipes it out; having wiped it out, he makes it once more. Thus wiping out, and making it again and again, those later and later shapes turn clearer, turn purer, and are thoroughly manifested; learning rightly in this way, after passing through much time, the people of the world together acclaim him as a great painter, or reckon him among the ranks of the masters. If he does not repeatedly wipe out the shape he has made, but only paints over it again and again upon the same, that shape can never have any hope of clarity, purity, and thoroughness. The principle of cultivating insight is likewise.
If one has aroused resolute conviction upon this object, one must surely correctly clear away again upon this object; it is not that, having correctly cleared away upon this object, one must surely arouse resolute conviction again upon this object. Having aroused resolute conviction upon a narrow-and-small object, one correctly clears away upon the narrow-and-small; the vast and the measureless are likewise. Having correctly cleared away upon a narrow-and-small object, one arouses resolute conviction again upon the narrow-and-small, or upon the vast, or upon the measureless; the vast and the measureless are likewise. Further: if the shape-images of the several material dharmas are manifested, one should know that they are coarse, resembling transformations; the several non-material dharmas take conceptual designation as prior, and, as by the dominant force of what is experienced, their images are manifested. All of this is named correct preparatory effort.
These nine bright-class preparatory efforts, one should know, are concordant with tranquillity and insight; the nine preparatory efforts contrary to them, one should know, are discordant with tranquillity and insight. The preparatory efforts thus established by the distinction of dark class and bright class come to eighteen kinds in all. Such is what is called one-pointedness of mind. 〔Sub-section 6, one-pointedness, concludes here.〕
Purifying the Obstructions: Purging the Four Obstructions by Four Causal Factors
What is purifying the obstructions? It is that the yoga practitioners who thus correctly cultivate preparatory effort are able, by four causal factors, to make their minds purge the several obstructions. Which four causal factors? First, thoroughly knowing the intrinsic nature; second, thoroughly knowing the causes and conditions; third, thoroughly knowing the faults; fourth, cultivating the counteraction.
That is: first one thoroughly knows the obstruction's intrinsic nature, then the causes and conditions by which it arises, then the faults of not keeping it far away, and finally one actually cultivates the corresponding counteraction. Only with all four does one make the mind purge the several obstructions.
Thoroughly knowing the intrinsic nature of the several obstructions: one is able to thoroughly know that the obstructions are of four kinds — first, the obstruction of faint-heartedness; second, the obstruction of covering-over; third, the obstruction of discursive thought; fourth, the obstruction of self-exaltation. The obstruction of faint-heartedness is, when one diligently cultivates renunciation and seclusion, all the defiled longing, displeasure, hankering, and grief. The obstruction of covering-over is precisely the five hindrances — sensual desire and the rest. The obstruction of discursive thought is precisely the defiled discursive thoughts — the discursive thought of desire and the rest. The obstruction of self-exaltation is exalting oneself while abiding at ease in some small and inferior knowledge-and-vision — saying "I am able to attain it, others then cannot," and so on as widely stated before.
To close each obstruction separately: the defiled longing, displeasure, hankering, and grief that arise while one diligently cultivates renunciation and seclusion are called the obstruction of faint-heartedness; the five hindrances, sensual desire and the rest, are called the obstruction of covering-over; defiled discursive thoughts, the thought of desire and the rest, are called the obstruction of discursive thought; and exalting oneself while abiding in some small and inferior knowledge-and-vision, thinking "I can attain it, others cannot," is called the obstruction of self-exaltation. This is called thoroughly knowing the intrinsic nature of the several obstructions.
Thoroughly knowing the causes and conditions of the several obstructions: the first, the "obstruction of faint-heartedness," has six causal conditions — first, being feeble in body through the dominant force of prior karma, or through the trouble of illness; second, excessive preparatory effort; third, not cultivating preparatory effort; fourth, first cultivating preparatory effort; fifth, the afflictions being ablaze; sixth, not yet having practiced seclusion repeatedly. The causes and conditions of the three obstructions of covering-over, discursive thought, and self-exaltation are the "unprincipled attention" practiced repeatedly, for the most part, within the dharmas that accord with these three obstructions. What is unprincipled attention here? Not directing attention to reflect upon the impure, but directing attention to reflect upon the pure mark; not directing attention to reflect upon loving-kindness, but directing attention to reflect upon the mark of hatred; not directing attention to reflect upon the mark of brightness, but directing attention to reflect upon the mark of darkness; not directing attention to reflect upon the mark of tranquillity, but directing attention to reflect upon evil discursive thoughts — of kin, of homeland, of not-dying, of the merriments, jests, laughter, and attendances one once passed through; not directing attention to reflect upon the causal nature of dependent origination, but directing attention to reflect, in an unprincipled way, upon a self and what belongs to a self among the formations of the three times — these are all unprincipled attention.
Item by item: not reflecting upon the impure but reflecting upon the pure mark is here called unprincipled attention; not reflecting upon loving-kindness but reflecting upon the mark of hatred is here called unprincipled attention; not reflecting upon the mark of brightness but reflecting upon the mark of darkness is here called unprincipled attention; not reflecting upon the mark of tranquillity but reflecting upon evil thoughts of kin, homeland, not-dying, and former merriment, jesting, laughter, and attendance is here called unprincipled attention; not reflecting upon the causal nature of dependent origination but construing a self and what belongs to a self among the formations of the three times is likewise here called unprincipled attention.
Thoroughly knowing the faults of the several obstructions: because one thoroughly knows that this obstruction is present, one, with respect to those four — "not realizing what is not yet realized, and losing what is already realized" — spoils the preparatory effort of yoga, has a defiled abiding, has a suffering-and-vexed abiding, ruins oneself and ruins others, and, when the body breaks up and life ends, is born into the several evil destinies.
Cultivating the counteraction: for the several "faint-hearted," recollection is used overall as the counteraction — by the attention of recollection one gladdens one's mind, so that faint-heartedness already arisen is cleared away and, not yet arisen, does not arise. For feebleness of body, excessive preparatory effort, and first cultivating preparatory effort, "the even and penetrating exercise of vigor" is used as the counteraction. For not cultivating preparatory effort, reverent listening and diligent inquiry are used as the counteraction. For the afflictions being ablaze, the preparatory effort upon such objects as the impure is used as the counteraction. If one has not practiced repeatedly, then such a means of reasoned discernment as this is used as the counteraction — thinking: because I once did not practice seclusion repeatedly, therefore now, cultivating seclusion, faint-heartedness arises; if I now do not practice seclusion, in the world to come it will surely be like this again, and so I now ought to reason correctly, casting off displeasure toward seclusion and cultivating delight in it. For the rest — the unprincipled attention of covering-over and the like — the principled attention contrary to it is used as the counteraction.
Thus faint-heartedness as a whole is counteracted by the recollective attention that gladdens the mind, clearing away what has arisen and preventing what has not arisen; bodily feebleness, excessive preparatory effort, and first cultivation are counteracted by evenly penetrating vigor; failure to cultivate is counteracted by reverent listening and diligent inquiry; blazing afflictions are counteracted by preparatory effort upon the impure and the other appropriate objects; seclusion not yet repeatedly practiced is counteracted by discerning that, if it is still not practiced in this life, the same faint-heartedness must recur in the next, and thus casting off displeasure and cultivating delight; the unprincipled attention underlying the remaining obstructions of covering-over, discursive thought, and self-exaltation is counteracted in each case by the contrary principled attention. This is called cultivating the counteraction. Further: one thoroughly knows that the intrinsic nature of the several obstructions "is able to obstruct, is able to defile, is subsumed under the dark class, and should be kept far from"; one thoroughly knows that only by the causes and conditions of keeping far from the several obstructions can one keep far from them, and so one should seek out the causes and conditions of the several obstructions; one thoroughly knows "what fault there is in not keeping far from what should be kept far from," and so one should seek out the faults of the several obstructions; and having kept far from them, one reflects further, "how are these obstructions to be made not to arise in the world to come," and so one should seek out the cultivation of the counteraction. By these causal factors one is able to make one's mind purge the several obstructions.
Tranquillity and Insight Being Many · Successively Depending upon Each Other · the Path of Their Yoked Working
One should know that, because those that accord with the teaching are many, insight too is many; and because insight is many, it makes tranquillity too be many. And this insight — because the object known is boundless, one should know that its measure too is boundless — by the three gateways and the six kinds of matter, in each and every boundless class and distinction, one penetratingly enters into the principle.
For one who correctly cultivates: the stronger the dominant force by which his insight is practiced repeatedly and purified, the more it increases and grows vast; and thus the pliancy of body and mind, within the class of tranquillity that can be produced, also increases and grows vast. As body and mind gain more pliancy, the one-pointedness of mind toward the object increases the more; as one-pointedness of mind increases the more, one again gains more pliancy of body and mind. The two dharmas — one-pointedness of mind, and pliancy of body and mind — successively depend upon each other, successively belong to each other; and these two dharmas, only if they gain "the transformation of the basis," are then thoroughgoing. Because one gains the transformation of the basis, with respect to the thing known there arises "direct-perception knowledge."
Question: to what point does one say "one has thoroughgoingly gained the contemplation of the impure"? And so on, to what point does one say "one has thoroughgoingly gained mindfulness of in-breath and out-breath"?
Answer: to state it in brief, because one who cultivates insight, within the correct preparatory effort of the contemplation of the impure, draws near, cultivates, and cultivates much — then whether walking or abiding, though various object-domains be present before him and though he examine all the several marks, yet abiding in his own nature, not through preparatory effort, for the most part it is impure marks that are manifested, not the several pure marks; and because he has well cultivated the impure, toward the dharmas that are able to accord with the ground of the enwrapment of greed, his mind does not proceed inward, does not take delight, does not gain conviction, but abides in equanimity and deeply gives rise to weary aversion. At that time the one who cultivates insight should know for himself: I have now gained the contemplation of the impure, have gained the fruit of what I cultivated — this alone is named having thoroughgoingly gained the contemplation of the impure; contrary to this, it is named not having gained thoroughgoingness. As with the contemplation of the impure, so with loving-kindness, the causal nature of dependent origination, the difference of the elements, and mindfulness of in-breath and out-breath. Among these the distinctions are: for the most part it is the marks of the loving-kind mind that are manifested, not the marks of hatred; toward the dharmas that accord with the ground of the enwrapment of hatred, the mind does not proceed inward, take delight, or gain conviction, but abides in equanimity and deeply gives rise to weary aversion. For the most part it is the marks of impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and no-self that are manifested, not the deluded marks that go together with permanence, pleasure, and the view of a bodily self; toward the dharmas that accord with the ground of the enwrapment of delusion, the mind likewise does not proceed inward, take delight, or gain conviction, but abides in equanimity and deeply gives rise to weary aversion. For the most part it is the mark-perceptions of the difference of the body-aggregate as of various elemental natures, not of a single elemental nature, that are manifested, not the perception of a body-aggregate as one; toward the dharmas that accord with the ground of the enwrapment of conceit, the mind likewise does not proceed inward, take delight, or gain conviction, but abides in equanimity and deeply gives rise to weary aversion. For the most part it is the perception of inner quieting, the perception of tranquillity, that is manifested, not the perception of idle proliferation; toward the dharmas that accord with the ground of the enwrapment of discursive thought, the mind likewise does not proceed inward, take delight, or gain conviction, but abides in equanimity and deeply gives rise to weary aversion.
Question: to what point does one say "the two, tranquillity and insight, join together and, in even balance, turn together" — whereby it is named the path of the yoked working?
Answer: if one has already gained, within the nine marks of mental settling, the ninth mark of mental settling (that is, meditative equipoise), and, taking this consummate meditative concentration as his support, he cultivates the higher wisdom within the contemplation of dharmas; then, because of the contemplation of dharmas, the path turns spontaneously, turns without exertion, not through preparatory effort, and insight is pure and bright-white, and, following tranquillity, is supple, taken up, and turns as taken up by the path of tranquillity — to this point it is named the two, tranquillity and insight, joining together and, in even balance, turning together, and by this it is named the path of the yoked working.
The Middle Uddāna
The middle uddāna says:
The mark, discursive thought, examination — the three gateways that follow along in practice.
Meaning, thing, mark, class, time, principle — the six matters and their distinctions.
First, corresponding preparatory effort; next, repeated-practice, unslackened,
unerring, timely, understanding, insatiable,
not casting off the wholesome yoke, and last, correct preparatory effort —
these nine one should know, having two classes and their distinction.
Knowing the intrinsic nature and the causes and conditions, seeing their several faults,
correctly cultivating the counteraction, one makes the obstructions become purified.
The Cultivation of Attention: the Four Kinds of Attention (Sub-section 8 is raised)
What is the cultivation of attention? It is that when one who is at first cultivating the work first sets to cultivation, within the universal mark thus established, by one-pointedness of mind and the purging of the several obstructions, he departs from wrong preparatory effort and learns correct preparatory effort. He should at the very outset make this thought: I now, in order to realize one-pointedness of mind and to cut off delight, will diligently cultivate the four kinds of attention. Which four? First, the attention that trains the mind; second, the attention that moistens the mind; third, the attention that produces pliancy; fourth, the attention of pure knowledge-and-vision.
- The attention that trains the mind: by this attention, toward the dharmas that may be found wearisome, one makes the mind avert in weariness. This is called the attention that trains the mind.
- The attention that moistens the mind: by this attention, toward the dharmas that may be found admirable, one makes the mind rejoice with delight. This is called the attention that moistens the mind.
- The attention that produces pliancy: by this attention, at each and every moment, having made the mind avert in weariness toward the dharmas that may be found wearisome and made the mind rejoice with delight toward the dharmas that may be found admirable, one abides in the inner quieting, markless, non-discriminating, and turns in one-pointed mindfulness; by this one counteracts all coarseness and heaviness of body and mind, and is able to make all body and mind be at ease and to give rise to all pliancy of body and mind. This is called the attention that produces pliancy.
- The attention of pure knowledge-and-vision: by this attention, at each and every moment, taking this very inwardly quieted mind as his support, by repeated preparatory effort from the inwardly stilled mind he cultivates the higher wisdom within the contemplation of dharmas; the cultivator, at each and every moment, makes the mind avert in weariness toward the dharmas that may be found wearisome, and thus, toward the outflows and the dharmas that are grounds for outflows, is able to make the mind grow hot, evenly hot, grow weary, evenly weary. This is called the attention of pure knowledge-and-vision.
What is named "the ground of what may be found wearisome"? In brief there are four kinds: when the decline of oneself and the decline of another are present before one, and one reflects on them again and again with principled attention, they become grounds of the wearisome; when the flourishing of oneself and the flourishing of another are in the past, wholly perished, departed, and altered-and-ruined, and one reflects on them again and again with principled attention, they become grounds of the wearisome. The cultivator, at each and every moment, makes the mind rejoice with delight toward the dharmas that may be found admirable, and, by the arising of delight, is able to make the mind exceedingly saturated, softened, and clarified-and-cleared.
What is named "the ground of what may be found admirable"? In brief there are three kinds: first, the Three Jewels; second, the purity of the points of training, the purity of moral discipline; third, deeply giving rise to conviction, with a mind unfaint, toward the difference of what one has oneself realized. Recollecting the Three Jewels so as to make the mind rejoice with delight: making this thought — I now well gain a great benefit, in that the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Fully and Perfectly Awakened, is my great teacher; I now well gain a great benefit, in that within the well-spoken Dharma-Vinaya I have gone forth to homelessness; I now well gain a great benefit, in that with fellow practitioners of the pure life who are endowed with discipline and endowed with virtue, patient, gentle, and accomplished in wholesome dharmas, I am joined as companions in the Dharma; I shall gain a wholesome ending of life, a wholesome passing away, a wholesome proceeding to the world to come. Recollecting the purity of the points of training and the purity of moral discipline so as to make the mind rejoice with delight: making this thought — I now well gain a great benefit, in that within the great teacher the Tathāgata, the well-spoken Dharma-Vinaya, and the assembly of śrāvakas who well cultivate right conduct, I have gained, together with fellow practitioners of the pure life, the same discipline, the same training, the same cultivation of loving and kindly deeds of body, speech, and mind, the same views, the same things enjoyed; this is "having non-regret as its prior, giving rise to gladness." This is called recollecting the purity of the points of training and the purity of moral discipline so as to make the mind rejoice with delight. Deeply giving rise to conviction, with a mind unfaint, toward the difference of what one has oneself realized, so as to make the mind rejoice with delight: making this thought — I now have power, have capability, my moral discipline is pure and fit to be a vessel of the Dharma; I have gained, together with fellow practitioners of the pure life, the same pure precepts, and, together with wise, rightly-arrived, good persons, the same views; I have the capability diligently to cultivate such right conduct, and within the present dharma am able to gain what is not yet gained, to touch what is not yet touched, to realize what is not yet realized — by this I make the mind give rise to great gladness. This is called making the mind rejoice with delight at the site where one deeply gives rise to conviction, with a mind unfaint, toward the difference of what one has oneself realized. And further, by valiant vigor before and after, I have already come to abide in the difference of what I have realized; by recollecting this, I again, at a later time, deeply give rise to conviction toward the difference of what I have realized, and make the mind rejoice with delight (this is the "alternate account").
That cultivator, toward the dharmas that may be found wearisome, trains his mind, and toward the dharmas that are able to accord with the grounds of the several outflows, makes the mind not turn toward them, but abide in a way that is discordant, cast off, and set apart; toward the dharmas that may be found admirable, he gladdens and moistens his mind, and, because he has affection for the dharmas produced from departure and seclusion, makes the mind proceed toward them, cleave to them, delight in them, and abide in harmony with them. Thus his mind, by the two marks of "weariness" and "delight," turns its back on the several dark classes and turns toward the several bright classes, easily loosed and turned. The mind's turning its back on the dark class is by the attention that trains the mind; its turning toward the bright class is by the attention that moistens the mind; at each and every moment, in dependence on tranquillity, inwardly gathering and holding the mind, is by the attention that produces pliancy; at each and every moment, discerning dharmas, discerning them utterly, universally seeking them out, universally examining them, is by the attention of pure knowledge-and-vision. Thus his mind, at each and every moment, being taken up by tranquillity and insight, becomes capable of serving as a cause that takes up all practice-marks and all virtues, and, passing through days and nights, instants, lava, and moments, gradually gains advancement.
The simile of the goldsmith: it is like a wise and skillful smith of gold and silver, or his apprentice, who at each and every moment smelts and refines the gold and silver, making it cast off all impurity and filth; and at each and every moment casts it into cool clear water, making it fit and pliant, supple and compliant, for the fashioning of the several ornaments; and then this smith, or his apprentice, having well understood by his corresponding fine and skillful knowledge, uses it as his working material and, among whatever ornaments he takes pleasure in, transforms it in various ways. Thus the one who diligently cultivates yoga, in order to make the mind turn its back on greed and all impurity and filth, and turn its back on defiled grief-and-vexation, deeply gives rise to weary aversion toward the dharmas that may be found wearisome; and in order to make it proceed toward the delight of all pure and wholesome classes, gives rise to rejoicing-delight toward the dharmas that may be found admirable. And then the practitioner, with respect to whichever class — of tranquillity or of insight — he wishes to establish himself in, is able to cleave to it well, to harmonize with it well, without turning and without moving, and, among whatever meanings he takes pleasure in, is able to accomplish all just as he is convinced.
教學弧:止觀的體相立了,這一葉教『修中的手眼』——怎麼下功才令心速疾得定(九種白品加行),心起伏時怎麼用止觀舉捨四行去校(心掉了用止、心沈了用舉、平了用捨),修中遇障怎麼除(淨障四步除四障),又怎麼用四種作意把心調得能厭能欣(修作意·鍛金師喻)。眼仍重:止觀雙運到了第九住心,「任運轉道、無功用轉」,而那雙運轉道、心一境性,《解深密》仍判為「通達影像唯是其識」——續著九住心段的唯識義眼,且這一回,攝決擇分、攝事分還從經內回頭印證。
九種下功法:對的與不對的
修定不是埋頭硬坐就行,下功有對有不對。論列「白品所攝九種加行」(九種順修的下功法),與它相違的就是九種黑品加行——白品令心速疾得定、三摩地勝進,黑品則處處稽遲。九種是:
相應(對機下藥:貪行修不淨、瞋行修慈愍、癡行修緣起、慢行修界差別、尋思行修數息——古德一句「藥病相應」點透(遁倫));串習(止觀已曾數習過,不是樣樣從頭);不緩(不鬆懈——出定辦事只求速了便回來坐,遇雜眾雖寒暄而不攀談;更要緊的是常思橫死、修無常想:身中風熱痰、宿食、毒蟲、人非人都能教人夭沒,所以哪怕只剩一日、一時、乃至「從入息到出息」這一口氣的工夫,也要於佛聖教精勤修習);無倒(依善師所教而學,不顛倒取、無我慢);應時(下節詳說);解了(諸相善取善了,欲入即入、欲住即住、欲起即起);無厭足(於善法不知足、步步上求,不得少為足);不捨軛(守學處、不取美色相、於食平等、勤修覺寤、少事少業——像牛不卸下擔子,令心不散);正加行(下節詳說)。第七、第八,古德只說一句「七八可知」,不另解(遁倫)。
心掉了用止、心沈了用舉、平了用捨
九加行裡,「應時加行」最堪細講——它教你看心的狀態、用對的法。修中要於時時間修止相、修觀相、修舉相、修捨相,並且要認得每一行的「自性、相、時」:
- 止:就是九相心住,令心無相、無分別、寂靜純一。什麼時候用止? 心掉舉、或恐怕要掉舉時。
- 觀:就是四行三門六事的觀行。什麼時候用觀? 心沈沒、或恐怕要沈沒時。
- 舉:取一種「淨妙所緣」,顯示、勸導、慶慰其心,把心策勵起來。什麼時候用舉? 心沈下、或恐怕要沈下時。
- 捨:於所緣心無染污、心平等,止觀調柔正直、任運而轉。什麼時候用捨? 止觀品的掉舉心已經解脫了,那時用捨——不再多費精進。
止對掉、舉對沈、捨對平——這套「看狀態下對藥」的手眼,《解深密經》裡慈氏菩薩問、世尊答,講得一模一樣:「若心掉舉或恐掉舉時……是名止相;若心沈沒或恐沈沒時……是名舉相;……諸無功用作意……是名捨相」(解深密)。不只經這樣說,攝決擇分聲聞地也逐字再說了一遍(「由下劣心慮恐下劣便正修舉,由掉舉心慮恐掉舉便修內止,心得平等便修上捨」),而攝事分更明白回指:這止舉捨相,「如聲聞地……已辯其相」——就是指本葉這一段。經內經外,互相印證。
畫師弟子的功夫:數除數遣
「正加行」教的是另一手——數起勝解、數正除遣。於所緣境,一面起勝解(明明白白現起所緣相),一面又正除遣(把它放下);起了又遣、遣了又起。論怕你不明白,打一個畫師弟子喻:
畫師的弟子初學畫,從師受了樣本,諦觀諦觀、照著作那形相;作完隨即除毀,既毀又再作。如此除毀、又數數重作,那形相便後後轉明、轉淨、究竟顯現;這樣學下去,多時之後便被推為大畫師。若不肯除、只在原稿上一遍遍重畫,那形相永遠沒有明淨可期。
修觀也是這樣:肯「數除數遣」,勝解才越來越明淨究竟,能往趣現觀;只一味起勝解、不肯除遣,就停在那裡上不去。正除遣有五種(內攝其心、不念作意、於餘作意、對治作意、無相界作意),但這裡正取的只是前二——「內攝其心」與「不念作意」。修中還有一手叫「而行」:於所緣「不取不捨」——緣上止行轉故不名為捨,不作相、無分別故不名為取,這樣內攝其心、除遣所緣。〔古德此處只釋到「不名為捨」一句;「不取」的義是論本自說,見原典。〕
至此,黑白共十八種加行說完,論收一句:「如是名為心一境性。」——科6「一境性」的義,從上葉九住心開講,到這裡才算講完。
修中的四種障,與除障的四步
修定的路上會遇障。論說:正修加行的瑜伽師,由四因緣能淨除諸障——遍知障的自性、遍知障的因緣、遍知障的過患、修習對治。障有四種:
- 怯弱障:勤修出離、遠離時,對雜染法還有戀慕、不樂、希望、憂惱(心軟了、退了)。它有六種因緣(身羸劣、太過加行、不修加行、初修加行、煩惱熾盛、於遠離未串習)。
- 蓋覆障:就是貪欲等五蓋。
- 尋思障:就是欲、恚、害等染污尋思。
- 自舉障:得了一點下劣的智見就自高——「我能得,別人不能」。
後三障的因緣,總在「非理作意」——該思惟不淨卻去想淨相、該思惟慈愍卻去想瞋相、該想光明卻想黑闇、該想奢摩他卻想親屬國土的歡娛、該思緣起卻於三世計我我所。除障的對治也對症:怯弱用隨念慶悅其心;身羸劣、太過、初修用「精進平等」;不修用恭敬聽聞請問;煩惱熾盛用不淨等所緣;未串習用思擇方便(想:我昔不串習故今怯弱,再不習則來世還如此,所以該修遠離的喜樂);其餘蓋覆等用『相違的如理作意』對治。
止觀雙運:到第九住心,任運不費力
修到深處,止與觀不再是兩件事,而能「雙運」。論說:心一境性與身心輕安二法,展轉相依、相屬;這二法若得轉依才究竟——身心輕安離了麁重,叫「轉依」;心一境性離了散亂,叫「得轉依」(遁倫點明此二義);得了轉依,於所知事便生「現量智」。
到什麼地步才叫「雙運轉道」?論答:到了九相心住的第九(三摩呬多),用這圓滿三摩地為依止,於法觀中修增上慧;那時「任運轉道、無功用轉、不由加行」,毘鉢舍那清淨鮮白,隨奢摩他調柔而轉——這才名止觀二種和合平等俱轉,名雙運轉道。
而這「雙運轉道、心一境性」是什麼?《解深密經》一句到底:「謂通達三摩地所行影像唯是其識;或通達此已,復思惟如性」(解深密)。聲聞修到止觀雙運,所緣的影像,經仍判為唯識所現——這正續著上葉九住心段的唯識義眼,是聲聞止觀通於唯識的同一條樞紐。
鍛金師的功夫:四種作意調心
到「修作意」(科8 起),論教用四種作意把心調得能厭能欣:調練心(於可厭法令心厭離)、滋潤心(於可欣法令心欣樂)、生輕安(厭欣之後安住內寂靜,對治身心麁重、生身心輕安)、淨智見(用內靜心於法觀中修增上慧)。可厭的有四處(自他衰損現前、自他興盛在過去變壞了),可欣的有三處(三寶、尸羅清淨、自所證),各各隨念令心或厭或欣。
論打一個鍛金師喻收束:
像有巧智的鍛金銀師(或他的弟子),時時把金銀燒鍊、令它棄捨一切垢穢;又時時投進清冷水,令它調柔堪任;於是隨所要的莊嚴具,種種打造成辦。
修瑜伽的人也這樣:為令心棄背貪等垢穢,於可厭法深生厭離(這是「燒鍊棄垢」,靠調練心);為令心趣向清淨善品的喜樂,於可欣法發生欣樂(這是「投水調柔」,靠滋潤心);於是隨他要安立的止品或觀品,都能善親附、善和合,如所信解皆能成辦。
〔辨異一句:本葉所說「修作意」是這四種作意(調練·滋潤·生輕安·淨智見);窺基《略纂》卷九所釋的「第五修作意」,講的卻是後文離欲的七種作意(了相→加行究竟果)——名相相同而所指不同,二者不可相混。〕
承衍
這一葉把『修中的手眼』交代齊了:九種下功法、止觀舉捨的校心、數除數遣的功夫、淨障的四步、雙運轉道的究竟、以及修作意的四種調心。修作意才剛立起框架,下一葉(13-03-04),便要接著說:初修業者怎麼依這修作意「如應安立」,從頭起修——把這一處止觀的全部教授,落到一個剛上路的人身上。聲聞修瑜伽的「修」字,到那裡才真正下到地面。
Teaching arc: the essence and character of tranquillity-and-insight now set up, this leaf teaches "the working hand and eye of cultivation" — how to apply oneself so that the mind swiftly gains concentration (the nine preparatory efforts of the bright class), how, when the mind rises and falls, to correct it by the four practices of tranquillity, insight, exertion, and equanimity (when the mind is agitated, use tranquillity; when it sinks, use exertion; when it is even, use equanimity), how, when one meets an obstruction in cultivation, to purge it (the four steps of purifying the obstructions, purging the four obstructions), and how, by four kinds of attention, to train the mind so that it can weary and can rejoice (the cultivation of attention · the simile of the goldsmith). The eye is still heavy: the yoked working of tranquillity and insight, reaching the ninth station of mind, "the path turns spontaneously, turns without exertion," and that path of yoked working, that one-pointedness of mind, the Saṃdhinirmocana still adjudges as "penetrating that the image is only its own consciousness" — continuing the consciousness-only eye of doctrine from the nine-stations-of-mind leaf; and this time, the Section on Ascertainment and the Section on the Gathering of Events attest it back again from within the scripture.
The Nine Ways of Applying Oneself: the Right and the Wrong
Cultivating concentration is not a matter of merely sitting hard with the head down; there is a right and a wrong in how one applies oneself. The treatise lists "nine preparatory efforts subsumed under the bright class" (the nine methods of applying oneself in accord with cultivation), and contrary to them are the nine dark-class preparatory efforts — the bright class makes the mind swiftly gain concentration and the meditative concentration advance, the dark class delays at every turn. The nine are:
Corresponding (medicine suited to the disease: one who acts from greed cultivates the impure; from hatred, loving-kindness; from delusion, dependent origination; from conceit, the difference of the elements; from discursive thought, mindfulness of breathing — the ancient masters pierce it through with a single phrase, "medicine corresponds to disease" 〔Dunlun〕); repeated-practice (one has already practiced tranquillity and insight repeatedly, not every thing from the beginning); unslackened (not slackening — coming out of concentration to attend to affairs, one only seeks to finish quickly and then returns to sit; meeting assorted crowds, though one exchanges greetings one does not enter into chatter; more urgent still, one constantly reflects on sudden death and cultivates the perception of impermanence: wind, heat, and phlegm within the body, undigested food, venomous vermin, humans and non-humans can all bring a man to an untimely end, and so even if there be left only one day, one hour, or the span of "an in-breath to an out-breath," this one breath's worth of effort, one must still diligently cultivate yoga upon the Buddha's holy teaching); unerring (one learns as taught by a good teacher, taking nothing in an inverted way, without self-conceit); timely (detailed in the next section); understanding (having taken and understood the several marks well, when one wishes to enter one enters, to abide one abides, to rise one rises); insatiable (with respect to wholesome dharmas one is never satisfied, one seeks ever higher step by step, not taking a little for enough); yoke-not-cast-off (guarding the points of training, not taking up the mark of a beautiful form, being even-minded toward food, diligently cultivating wakefulness, few affairs and few undertakings — like an ox that does not lay down its load, keeping the mind from scattering); correct (detailed in the next section). Of the seventh and eighth, the ancient masters say only the single phrase "the seventh and eighth may be known," and do not gloss them further 〔Dunlun〕.
When the Mind Is Agitated Use Tranquillity, When It Sinks Use Exertion, When It Is Even Use Equanimity
Among the nine preparatory efforts, "timely preparatory effort" most deserves close treatment — it teaches you to watch the state of the mind and use the right method. In cultivation one must, at each and every moment, cultivate the mark of tranquillity, the mark of insight, the mark of exertion, the mark of equanimity, and one must recognize the "intrinsic nature, mark, and time" of each practice:
- Tranquillity: this is the nine marks of mental settling, making the mind markless, non-discriminating, quieted, and unmixedly one. When does one use tranquillity? When the mind is agitated, or when one fears it is about to become agitated.
- Insight: this is the practice of insight of the four practices, three gateways, and six matters. When does one use insight? When the mind sinks, or when one fears it is about to sink.
- Exertion: taking up one "pure and excellent object," one displays, urges on, and gladdens the mind, spurring it up. When does one use exertion? When the mind sinks down, or when one fears it is about to sink down.
- Equanimity: toward the object the mind is undefiled and even, and tranquillity and insight are supple, upright, and turn spontaneously. When does one use equanimity? When the agitated mind within the class of tranquillity and insight has already been liberated, then one uses equanimity — no longer spending further vigor.
Tranquillity counters agitation, exertion counters sinking, equanimity counters evenness — this hand-and-eye of "watching the state and using the right medicine" is spoken exactly the same in the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, where the bodhisattva Maitreya asks and the World-Honored One answers: 「若心掉舉或恐掉舉時……是名止相;若心沈沒或恐沈沒時……是名舉相;……諸無功用作意……是名捨相」 tr. "when the mind is agitated or when one fears agitation … this is named the mark of tranquillity; when the mind sinks or when one fears sinking … this is named the mark of exertion; … the several attentions of no-exertion … these are named the mark of equanimity" 〔Saṃdhinirmocana〕. Not only does the scripture speak thus; the Section on Ascertainment's Śrāvaka Stage also says it over again word for word (「由下劣心慮恐下劣便正修舉,由掉舉心慮恐掉舉便修內止,心得平等便修上捨」 tr. "by an inferior mind, fearing inferiority, one duly cultivates exertion; by an agitated mind, fearing agitation, one cultivates inner tranquillity; the mind gaining evenness, one cultivates the higher equanimity"), and the Section on the Gathering of Events points back still more plainly: these marks of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity are, 「如聲聞地……已辯其相」 tr. "as the Śrāvaka Stage … has already discriminated their marks" — that is, precisely this present passage of this leaf. Within and without the scripture, they attest one another.
The Painter's Apprentice's Work: Repeated Clearing, Repeated Removing
"Correct preparatory effort" teaches another hand — repeatedly arousing resolute conviction, repeatedly correctly clearing away. With respect to the object-domain, on the one hand one arouses resolute conviction (bringing the object-mark plainly and clearly to presence), and on the other hand one correctly clears it away (setting it down); having aroused it one removes it, having removed it one arouses it again. Fearing you will not understand, the treatise strikes a simile of the painter's apprentice:
The painter's apprentice at first learns to paint; having received the model from his master, he contemplates it and contemplates it and makes that shape after it; having made it, he straightaway wipes it out; having wiped it out, he makes it again. Thus wiping it out and making it repeatedly again, the shape turns ever after clearer, purer, and thoroughly manifest; learning on in this way, after much time he is acclaimed a great painter. If he refuses to wipe out and only paints over the same draft round after round, that shape can never have any hope of clarity and purity.
Cultivating insight is likewise: if one is willing to "repeatedly clear and repeatedly remove," the resolute conviction becomes ever clearer, purer, and more thoroughgoing, and can proceed onward to direct realization; if one merely arouses resolute conviction and refuses to clear it away, one stops right there and cannot advance. Correct clearing-away is of five kinds (inwardly gathering the mind, the attention of not-minding, attention upon another, the attention of counteraction, the attention of the markless element), but what is here properly taken up is only the first two — "inwardly gathering the mind" and "the attention of not-minding." There is yet another hand in cultivation called "how one practices": with respect to the object one "neither takes up nor casts off" — because the practice of tranquillity turns upon the object it is not named casting-off, and because one makes no mark and does not discriminate it is not named taking-up, and thus one inwardly gathers the mind and clears away the object. 〔The ancient master here glosses only as far as the phrase "it is not named casting-off"; the meaning of "not taking up" is stated by the treatise-text itself — see the source.〕
To this point the eighteen preparatory efforts, dark and bright together, have been spoken, and the treatise gathers it in a single line: 「如是名為心一境性」 tr. "such is what is called one-pointedness of mind." — The meaning of sub-section 6, "one-pointedness," which began to be expounded from the nine-stations-of-mind of the previous leaf, is here at last fully expounded.
The Four Obstructions in Cultivation, and the Four Steps for Purging Them
On the road of cultivating concentration one meets obstructions. The treatise says: the yoga practitioner who correctly cultivates preparatory effort is able, by four causal factors, to purge the several obstructions — thoroughly knowing the intrinsic nature of the obstruction, thoroughly knowing the causes and conditions of the obstruction, thoroughly knowing the faults of the obstruction, cultivating the counteraction. The obstructions are of four kinds:
- The obstruction of faint-heartedness: when one diligently cultivates renunciation and seclusion, there is still longing, displeasure, hankering, and grief toward defiled dharmas (the mind softens, retreats). It has six causes and conditions (feebleness of body, excessive preparatory effort, not cultivating preparatory effort, first cultivating preparatory effort, the afflictions being ablaze, not yet having practiced seclusion repeatedly).
- The obstruction of covering-over: this is precisely the five hindrances — sensual desire and the rest.
- The obstruction of discursive thought: this is precisely the defiled discursive thoughts — of desire, of ill-will, of harm, and the rest.
- The obstruction of self-exaltation: having gained a little inferior knowledge-and-vision one exalts oneself — "I can attain it, others cannot."
The causes and conditions of the latter three obstructions lie wholly in "unprincipled attention" — reflecting on the pure mark when one should reflect on the impure, on the mark of hatred when one should reflect on loving-kindness, on darkness when one should reflect on brightness, on the merriments of kin and homeland when one should reflect on tranquillity, on a self and what belongs to a self among the formations of the three times when one should reflect on dependent origination. The counteraction for purging the obstructions likewise fits the disease: for faint-heartedness, use recollection to gladden the mind; for feebleness of body, excess, and first cultivation, use "the even exercise of vigor"; for not cultivating, use reverent listening and inquiry; for the afflictions being ablaze, use such objects as the impure; for not having practiced repeatedly, use the means of reasoned discernment (thinking: because I did not practice repeatedly, therefore now I am faint-hearted, and if I do not practice again the world to come will still be like this, and so I ought to cultivate the delight of seclusion); for the rest — covering-over and the like — use "the principled attention contrary to it" as the counteraction.
The Yoked Working of Tranquillity and Insight: at the Ninth Station of Mind, Turning Spontaneously without Effort
Cultivating to the depths, tranquillity and insight are no longer two separate matters, but can "work yoked together." The treatise says: the two dharmas, one-pointedness of mind and pliancy of body and mind, successively depend upon and belong to each other; and only if these two dharmas gain the transformation of the basis are they thoroughgoing — pliancy of body and mind departing from coarseness-and-heaviness is called "the transformation of the basis," and one-pointedness of mind departing from scatteredness is called "gaining the transformation of the basis" 〔Dunlun points out these two senses〕; and having gained the transformation of the basis, toward the thing known there arises "direct-perception knowledge."
To what point is it named "the path of the yoked working"? The treatise answers: reaching the ninth (meditative equipoise) of the nine marks of mental settling, and, taking this consummate meditative concentration as one's support, cultivating the higher wisdom within the contemplation of dharmas; at that time "the path turns spontaneously, turns without exertion, not through preparatory effort," and insight is pure and bright-white and turns supple, following tranquillity — this alone is named the two, tranquillity and insight, joining together and, in even balance, turning together, and is named the path of the yoked working.
And what is this "path of the yoked working, this one-pointedness of mind"? The Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra settles it in a single phrase: 「謂通達三摩地所行影像唯是其識;或通達此已,復思惟如性」 tr. "namely, penetrating that the image ranged over in meditative concentration is only its own consciousness; or, having penetrated this, further reflecting on its suchness-nature" 〔Saṃdhinirmocana〕. When the śrāvaka cultivates to the yoked working of tranquillity and insight, the image taken as object is still adjudged by the scripture to be manifested by consciousness-only — this is precisely the continuation of the consciousness-only eye of doctrine from the nine-stations-of-mind leaf above, the one same pivot by which the śrāvaka's tranquillity and insight open onto consciousness-only.
The Goldsmith's Work: Training the Mind by Four Kinds of Attention
Reaching "the cultivation of attention" (sub-section 8 is raised), the treatise teaches the use of four kinds of attention to train the mind so that it can weary and can rejoice: the mind-training (making the mind avert in weariness toward dharmas that may be found wearisome), the mind-moistening (making the mind rejoice with delight toward dharmas that may be found admirable), the pliancy-producing (after wearying and rejoicing, abiding in the inner quieting, counteracting coarseness-and-heaviness of body and mind, producing pliancy of body and mind), and the pure-knowledge-and-vision (using the inwardly stilled mind to cultivate the higher wisdom within the contemplation of dharmas). Of the wearisome there are four grounds (the decline of oneself and of another present before one; the flourishing of oneself and of another passed and altered-and-ruined), and of the admirable three grounds (the Three Jewels, the purity of moral discipline, what one has oneself realized), each recollected so as to make the mind either weary or rejoice.
The treatise strikes a simile of the goldsmith to draw it to a close:
Like a wise and skillful smith of gold and silver (or his apprentice), who at each and every moment smelts and refines the gold and silver, making it cast off all impurity and filth; and again at each and every moment casts it into cool clear water, making it supple and fit; and then, among whatever ornaments he requires, fashions and accomplishes them in various ways.
One who cultivates yoga is likewise: in order to make the mind turn its back on greed and all impurity and filth, one deeply gives rise to weary aversion toward dharmas that may be found wearisome (this is "smelting and casting off the filth," by the mind-training); in order to make the mind proceed toward the delight of pure and wholesome classes, one gives rise to rejoicing-delight toward dharmas that may be found admirable (this is "casting into water and making supple," by the mind-moistening); and then, with respect to whichever class — of tranquillity or of insight — one wishes to establish oneself in, one is able to cleave to it well and harmonize with it well, and accomplish all just as one is convinced.
〔A distinguishing note: the "cultivation of attention" spoken of in this leaf is these four kinds of attention (mind-training · mind-moistening · pliancy-producing · pure-knowledge-and-vision); the "fifth, cultivation of attention" glossed by Kuiji in the ninth fascicle of the Concise Compendium speaks instead of the seven attentions of the later dispassion passage (apprehending-the-aspect → the fruit of the culmination of effort) — the names are the same but what they refer to differs, and the two are not to be confounded.〕
Carrying Forward
This leaf has laid out in full "the working hand and eye of cultivation": the nine ways of applying oneself, the correcting of the mind by tranquillity, insight, exertion, and equanimity, the work of repeated clearing and repeated removing, the four steps of purifying the obstructions, the thoroughgoingness of the path of yoked working, and the training of the mind by the four kinds of attention. The cultivation of attention has only just had its frame set up; the next leaf (13-03-04) will go on to say: how one who is at first cultivating the work "duly establishes himself" in dependence on this cultivation of attention, and cultivates from the beginning — bringing the whole instruction of this one place of tranquillity and insight down onto a person who has just set out on the road. The word "cultivate" in the śrāvaka's cultivation of yoga only there truly comes down to the ground.
考據Apparatus
本子古德二態:遁倫《論記》卷七之下〔T42 0465a09–0467a13〕逐科詳釋(九加行·止觀舉捨相·正除遣·淨障四障·止觀雙運道·中嗢柁南·修作意可厭患可欣尚·並引景〔道景〕·泰〔神泰〕·三藏〔玄奘〕);窺基《略纂》卷八末〔T43 0119a23–0119b17〕唯釋淨障之不淨觀細目(九加行/止觀舉捨/正除遣/中嗢柁南/雙運道/四作意/鍛金喻 略纂皆略過不釋)。最勝子《釋》T1580 無逐句專釋。 ★古德辨異(重要·據實標):本論「修作意」=四作意(調練心·滋潤心·生輕安·淨智見);窺基《略纂》卷九所釋之「第五修作意」實指離欲之七作意(了相·勝解·遠離·攝樂·觀察·加行究竟·加行究竟果)〔T43 0119c05「今解第五修作意」〕——名同而所指異,窺基將「修作意門」收於下文離欲段,非釋本葉四作意。錄其異,不混。 古德於本葉「略」之處據實標:七、八加行(遁倫「可知」·無釋)·四作意四名(遁倫不逐一釋)·畫師喻/鍛金師喻(遁倫唯標「法·喻·合」結構·不釋喻象)·窺基大半略過(見上)。
一、科判定位
| 科判系統 | 此段之位 |
|---|---|
| 玄奘 T1579 本地分十七地 | 第十三聲聞地·第三瑜伽處·科6尾+科7+科8首:白品九種加行(→「如是名為心一境性」結科6)+淨障(科7)+中嗢柁南+修作意四作意(科8 起)〔T30 0455b16–0459b23〕 |
| 論文自身 | 白品九加行(相應·串習·不緩·無倒·應時〔止觀舉捨〕·解了·無厭足·不捨軛·正加行〔正除遣五·而行·畫師喻〕)→黑白十八加行→心一境性結;淨障(四因緣·四障〔怯弱·蓋覆·尋思·自舉〕·遍知自性因緣過患·修習對治·止觀眾多·雙運轉道);中嗢柁南;修作意(四作意·可厭患四·可欣尚三·鍛金師喻) |
| 遁倫《論記》 | 「白各九別、列白品九名、相對辨異;次、隨別解釋白品九種;後、結二品辨其順逆總束」〔T42 0465a09〕;雙運道分四句、「第四明止觀二道雙運分齊」〔0466b〕;中嗢柁南「今此四頌但是中頌……初三頌頌心一境性、後一頌頌淨障」〔0466b28〕 |
| 窺基《略纂》 | 唯標「論『云何勤修不淨』,此第四、淨障也」〔T43 0119a23〕;其「第五修作意」別指離欲七作意〔0119c05〕(見凡例辨異) |
二、異譯·經內平行對勘
- 異譯:真諦《十七地論》卷30 相當·漢無傳本(佚)·從闕。
- ★經內平行(攝決擇·此段真有對應):與九住心段(無平行)不同,本葉之止·舉·捨相於攝決擇分聲聞地有逐字平行〔T30 0676c18·五種不放逸(定第二時)〕:「於時時間應修止相,於時時間應修舉相,於時時間應修捨相。彼於如是止舉捨相得善巧已,由下劣心慮恐下劣便正修舉,由掉舉心慮恐掉舉便修內止,心得平等便修上捨。」(止↔掉舉·舉↔下劣沈·捨↔平等,與本葉止觀舉捨時逐義相應。)又攝事分卷97〔T30 0855b25〕明指本葉為止舉捨相之所本:「此中依諸止舉捨相修習知時,如聲聞地及三摩呬多地已辯其相」。
校勘(大正原書校記全枚舉)
本段(0455b16–0459b23)大正原書藏本異讀校記共 30 條(含 CBETA 改字 2 條)+卷末大正編者原註 1 條(<app> 逐條校勘元素雖 0,原書校記以註記形式收錄——「校勘元素零」不等於「無校記」)。底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印);本段無一條升定本案(CBETA 改字兩讀並錄),異讀並錄備考:
| 註號 | 錨 | 底本【大】 | 異讀(校本) | 語境 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0455006 | 0455b19 | 無倒 | 不緩【明】 | 九加行·無倒(與不緩互倒) |
| 0455007 | 0455b19 | 不緩 | 無倒【明】 | 九加行·不緩(與無倒互倒) |
| 0455008 | 0455b22 | 勝* | 昇【宋】【元】【宮】,升【甲】*【聖】,什【明】* | 九加行段(四傳異) |
| 0455009 | 0455c08 | 蓋 | 善【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 淨障段(蓋/善) |
| 0455010 | 0455c18 | 儀 | 議【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | 淨障段(儀/議) |
| 0455011 | 0455c22 | 痰 | 淡【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | 障相·身病(痰/淡) |
| 0455012 | 0455c23 | 成 | 或【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 淨障段(成/或) |
| 0455013 | 0455c25 | 蠚 | 螫【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 障相喻(蠚/螫) |
| 0455014 | 0455c25 | 類等 | 等類【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 障相段 |
| 0456001 | 0456a02 | 從 | 於【宋】【元】 | 淨障段(從/於) |
| 0456002 | 0456a08 | 尊 | 等【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 淨障段(尊/等) |
| 0456003 | 0456a10 | (於時…相)八字 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | 修習觀相句(藏本脫八字) |
| 0456004 | 0456b27 | 寤 | 悟【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 淨障段(寤/悟) |
| 0456005 | 0456c04 | 數正除遣 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | 除遣句(藏本脫四字) |
| 0457001 | 0457a19 | 正 | 次【聖】 | 加行段(正/次) |
| 0457002 | 0457b02 | 八 | 八事【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 加行段 |
| 0457003 | 0457c07 | 習 | 集【宋】【元】【宮】 | 加行段(習/集) |
| 0457004 | 0457c24 | 更 | 便【聖】 | 加行段(更/便) |
| 0457005 | 0457c27 | 如〔大〕→知【CB】【麗-CB】【宮】 | 如【大】 | 加行段·CBETA 改字(底本承 CBETA 作知·大正原印如·兩讀並錄) |
| 0458001 | 0458a03 | 如 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 加行段 |
| 0458002 | 0458a07 | 得 | 復【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | 加行段(得/復) |
| 0458003 | 0458a24 | 念 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | 加行段 |
| 0458004 | 0458b01 | 相 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 加行段 |
| 0458005 | 0458b28 | 安 | 安心【聖】 | 加行段 |
| 0459001 | 0459a22 | 令 | 念【宋】 | 加行段(令/念) |
| 0459002 | 0459a22 | 心趣 | 向【宮】 | 加行段(心趣/向) |
| 0459003 | 0459b03 | 勝 | 昇【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | 加行段(勝/昇) |
| 0459004 | 0459b04 | 第〔大〕→弟【CB】【宋】【元】【宮】【聖】 | 第【大】 | 卷末·CBETA 改字(底本承 CBETA 作弟·大正原印第·兩讀並錄) |
| 0459005 | 0459b04 | 鍊 | 練【宋】【元】【聖】 | 卷末段(鍊/練) |
| 0459006 | 0459b16 | 辦 | 辦沙門玄袞敬造【聖】 | 卷末·聖本題記(辦下有寫經人名) |
| 0459007 | 卷末(0459) | 大正編者原註 | 此下聖本有光明皇后願文(卷31末側·不採) | 不採 |
全 30 條底本從 CBETA 承字讀(凡 CBETA 承麗藏等回改處,並錄大正原印),無升定本案。帶*者係大正原欄星標,照錄。0457005·0459004 係 CBETA 改字(底本承 CBETA 作「知」「弟」·大正原印作「如」「第」·兩讀並錄,定本讀如上)。0459006 係聖本寫經題記·0459007 係大正編者原註(聖本卷末願文),並錄註明。此外古德引本字異(窺基「惡嗅/生嗅」「血罐 𭥓·缺字 CB05005」)非藏本校記,唯錄。
三、聖教義之經據(眼·重——止觀舉捨·雙運轉道·心一境性,續通《解深密·分別瑜伽品》之唯識義)
承九住心段(13-03-02)之唯識義眼,本葉之止觀舉捨相·雙運轉道,皆與《解深密經·分別瑜伽品》逐義相通。錄經據二:
(一) 止相·舉相·捨相·逐義同經〔解深密 T16 0699b22〕——慈氏問止舉捨相,世尊答:「若心掉舉或恐掉舉時,諸可厭法作意及彼無間心作意,是名止相。若心沈沒或恐沈沒時,諸可欣法作意及彼心相作意,是名舉相。若於一向止道、或於一向觀道、或於雙運轉道,二隨煩惱所染污時,諸無功用作意及心任運轉中所有作意,是名捨相。」與本葉「心掉舉時是修止時·心沈沒時是修觀(舉)時·掉舉已解脫是修捨時」(0455–0456 本論)逐義相應。
(二) 雙運轉道=心一境性=通達影像唯識(義眼·結穴)〔解深密 T16 0698b17〕——慈氏問「齊何當言奢摩他毘鉢舍那和合俱轉」,世尊答「若正思惟心一境性」;又問「云何心一境性」,答「謂通達三摩地所行影像唯是其識;或通達此已,復思惟如性」。本葉雙運轉道(九相心住第九三摩呬多·法觀修增上慧·無功用轉·0459 本論)即此「心一境性·通達影像唯識」之究竟分齊——聲聞止觀雙運之所緣,經自判為唯識所現,續九住心段義眼。
〔按〕本葉止觀舉捨·雙運轉道之唯識義眼,悉據《解深密·分別瑜伽品》經本(佛說·玄奘譯),非現代詮釋;錄經據以顯義眼,不引現代學者。攝決擇分菩薩地亦逐字引此解深密止舉捨相段(慈氏-無著傳承之內證),唯錄不別判。
四、諸家異釋(古德·唯錄不判)
白品九加行·科判+逐加行(遁倫·七八「可知」)
〔遁倫 T42 0465a09·0465a17〕:
科判:「白各九別、列白品九名、相對辨異;次、隨別解釋白品九種;後、結二品辨其順逆總束。」 逐釋:「一、想應加行者〔遁倫作「想」〕,謂貪欲者修不淨觀等,藥病相應故。二、串習加行者,於止觀品曾多習乃至少分……三、不緩加行,謂起無間殷重;二修和敬業者,謂六和敬。四、無倒加行,如師開悟即如是學、離自慢等。五、應時加行,修止舉捨次應其時,又能了知止觀舉捨四法體相及時,止體即九相心住。」 〔按〕第七無厭足·第八不捨軛加行,遁倫唯標「七八可知」·無別釋〔0465b23〕。
★ 止·觀·舉·捨相(遁倫·捨相引景/泰二師)
〔遁倫 T42 0465a25·0465b13〕:
止相二相:「止相有二:一、所緣相,即是止品所知本質同分影像,是止所緣相;二、因緣相……依奢摩他熏習修止,恐止心沈沒,為令離沈得清淨故修觀加行,望清淨止為因緣相。」 觀相二相:「云何為觀?謂四行三門六事差別所緣觀行,即次前卷四種毘鉢舍那……觀相有二:一、所緣相,謂觀品所知本質事同分影像;二、因緣相……恐觀心太浮掉動,為令離掉得清淨故修奢摩他加行。」 捨相〔景/泰〕:「於止觀品調柔正直等者,止觀均平名調柔正直。景云:極捨沈掉令心上捨,若太過精進則心浮動,故不得太過精進。泰云:於所緣境極離止舉,名增上緣。捨時,謂於止觀品創離掉舉是修捨時;亦應言:於止觀品所有沈沒心已解脫,是修捨時。」
解了加行·棄影像緣本質(遁倫·三藏)
〔遁倫 T42 0465b22〕:
「三藏云:棄捨定中所緣影像,乃緣本〔如〕林中骨鎖本質。」(解了加行「棄捨三摩地影像,思惟不定地本性所緣」之釋。)
正加行·正除遣五種·而行(遁倫·簡取內攝/不念)
〔遁倫 T42 0465b24·0465c16〕:
「正除遣……簡取正明中:雖遍安立一切所緣正除遣相總有五種,然此義中意取內攝其心、不念作意二種……是故後三(於餘作意·對治作意·無相界作意)不順除遣正加行事。」 而行:「『復行有相有分別不淨等境』者,此明由不念作意而取外相不淨等境;『云何而行』下,釋不捨不取之義——由於所緣止行轉故,不名為捨。」〔「不取」之義依論本自說(原典:「即於所緣不作相故、無分別故、不名為取」)·非遁倫此處語,析出歸論本。〕 〔按〕畫師弟子喻:遁倫唯標「舉喻顯之·合喻」結構〔0465c21〕·不釋畫師喻象。
淨障·四障(遁倫釋怯弱/尋思·蓋覆自舉入對治)
〔遁倫 T42 0466a09〕:
「怯弱障者,謂於涅槃出離法及於世出世道遠離之法勤修行時,於雜染法有戀慕、不樂、希望、憂惱,故心怯弱。尋思障者,謂欲恚害等尋思……修習對治中,初明怯弱治,總用隨念為對治;次明別治:貪蓋及欲尋,不淨想治;恚蓋恚尋,修慈為治;惛沈睡眠,思明相為治;掉舉惡作親眷尋等,修止行寂靜。」 〔按〕蓋覆障·自舉障,遁倫不別立名義釋·攝入對治列(唯錄·不補);窺基本葉唯釋淨障之不淨觀細目(惡嗅生嗅·血罐𭥓·見目六/校勘)。
★ 止觀雙運道·轉依(遁倫·四句分別第四)
〔遁倫 T42 0466a25·0466b01〕:
「正修行者下,第二明由觀串習增長廣大令止亦然;身心輕安離於麁重名轉依,心一境性離散亂名得轉依,依於所知境現量智生。……問齊何當言奢摩他毘鉢舍那二種俱轉下,第四明止觀二道雙運分齊:九相心住中第九等持住(亦名等引住),用此為依於世俗勝義諦法觀中修增上慧……由多修習、不由功用、止觀雙轉。」
中嗢柁南·中頌(遁倫)
〔遁倫 T42 0466b28〕:
「今此四頌但是中頌,以安立中有其五義,餘有第五修作意門未解,舉此頌重收前義,故名為中。今此四頌頌前二門:初三頌頌心一境性,後之一頌頌於淨障;初一頌頌三門六事差別所緣,次二頌頌九種加行。」
修作意·可厭患可欣尚(遁倫·景師異門)
〔遁倫 T42 0466c16〕:
「今牒第三〔瑜伽〕於所安立五義中,心一境性普遍緣故……可厭患處略有四:一自衰損、二他衰損(會遇現前)、三自興盛、四他興盛(離變壞)。可欣有三:一隨念三寶……二隨念學處清淨尸羅清淨……三於自所證差別深生信解無怯弱處。」 〔景師·異門〕:「異門者,新有所證、心王欣樂於舊證,故名異門。」 〔按〕四作意四名(調練·滋潤·生輕安·淨智見),遁倫不逐一釋;鍛金師喻唯標「法·喻·合」結構〔0467a11〕·不釋喻象。
〔按目:遁倫·窺基·道景〔景〕·神泰〔泰〕·玄奘〔三藏〕皆古德。窺基「第五修作意」別指離欲七作意(凡例辨異)·非本葉四作意。二師於本葉「略」處據實標·不補。最勝子無逐句專釋。〕
五、術語(漢/古德傳梵·發音輔助)
| 漢 | 傳梵(音寫·發音輔助) | 義 |
|---|---|---|
| 三摩呬多 | samāhita | 等引(九相心住第九·等持住別名) |
| 奢摩他/毘鉢舍那/三摩地 | śamatha/vipaśyanā/samādhi | 止/觀/定(玄奘譯本通用音寫) |
| 鄔波索迦 | upāsaka | 近事男(在家男居士) |
| 臘縛 | lava | 時分名(須臾之分) |
| 白品九加行/止觀舉捨/正除遣/淨障四障/轉依/雙運轉道/調練滋潤輕安淨智見四作意 | —(義譯·從闕) | 義譯名相·非古德音寫 |
梵僅古德音寫;義譯名相 IAST 從闕(依古德所傳梵之約)。三摩呬多·奢摩他·毘鉢舍那等為玄奘譯本通用音寫。
六、譬喻·修辭
(一) 畫師弟子喻(論本自立·古德唯標結構)〔T30 0457a〕——以畫師弟子「諦觀作形相→作已尋即除毀→既毀復作,如如除毀數數更作,後後形相轉明轉淨究竟顯現」喻正加行之「數起勝解·數正除遣」;若不數除、只數數重畫,則形相永無明淨。遁倫唯標「舉喻·合喻」結構〔T42 0465c21〕·不釋喻象,義依論本自說。 (二) 鍛金銀師喻(論本自立·古德唯標結構)〔T30 0459b03〕——以鍛金師「時時燒鍊令棄垢穢·時時投清冷水令調柔堪任·乃隨所樂作莊嚴具」喻修作意之「調練心(棄垢/厭)·滋潤心(投水/欣)令心調柔堪任、隨所樂於止觀品成辦」。遁倫唯標「法·喻·合」結構〔T42 0467a11〕·不釋喻象。 (三) 鏡喻·影像唯識(解深密·眼·重·續前葉)——本葉止觀所緣之「同分影像」,承九住心段解深密「影像唯是識所現」之鏡喻(13-03-02 目六),此不重出·見前葉。
七、互讀(承衍)
- 承科6一境性·結於本葉:白品九加行為心一境性之修中加行,論至「黑白十八加行……如是名為心一境性」結科6(13-03-02 開、13-03-03 結,一境性義跨二葉)。
- 止觀舉捨·雙運轉道→《解深密·分別瑜伽品》+攝決擇·攝事分(經據/經內平行互讀):止舉捨相·雙運轉道之經據見目三(解深密);經內平行見目二(攝決擇分聲聞地 0676c·攝事分卷97 回指本葉為所本)。本聲聞止觀之雙運·唯識義眼,經內外互證。
- 修作意(科8 起·四作意)→ 初修業者(13-03-04·科8 續):本葉修作意立四作意(調練·滋潤·生輕安·淨智見)框架及可厭患可欣尚、鍛金師喻;之三卷界(0459b24)後,13-03-04 續說初修業者依此修作意如應安立、起修。辨異:本論「修作意四作意」≠窺基《略纂》所指「修作意=離欲七作意」(凡例·目四辨異)。
八、校本定位
- 底本:CBETA T30n1579 卷31–32·第三瑜伽處·科6尾+科7+科8首(白品九加行~修作意鍛金師喻)0455b16–0459b23。
- 古德頁錨(皆就藏經原文逐字複驗):遁倫《論記》卷七之下 T42 0465a09 起(科判 0465a09·止相二相 0465a25·捨相景泰 0465b13·解了三藏 0465b22·正除遣簡取 0465b24·淨障四障 0466a09·雙運道轉依 0466b01·中嗢柁南 0466b28·修作意可厭患可欣尚 0466c16)。最勝子 T30 無逐句專釋。
- 義理錨經(皆就藏經原文複驗):解深密經分別瑜伽品 T16n0676——止舉捨相 0699b22·雙運轉道=心一境性通達影像唯識 0698b17。
- 經內平行:攝決擇分聲聞地 T30 0676c18「止舉捨相·五種不放逸」逐字平行·攝事分卷97 0855b25 回指本葉為所本(藏本逐字驗)。
- 校勘:本段大正原書藏本異讀校記 30 條全枚舉(含 CBETA 改字 0457005 如/知·0459004 第/弟 二條兩讀並錄)+卷末大正編者原註 1 條(目二·底本從 CBETA 承字讀·無升定本案);「校勘元素零」不等於「無校記」(原書校記以註記形式收錄);古德引本字異(窺基惡嗅/生嗅)非藏本校記唯錄;真諦卷30 相當佚·從闕。缺字:窺基血罐段「𭥓」CB05005(U+2D953·屬窺基不淨段·本葉引文邊際·已標)。
The two postures of the ancient masters on this fascicle: Dunlun's Notes, the latter part of fascicle 7 〔T42 0465a09–0467a13〕 gives a detailed gloss section by section (the nine preparatory efforts · the marks of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity · correct clearing-away · the four obstructions of purifying the obstructions · the path of the yoked working of tranquillity and insight · the middle uddāna · the cultivation of attention, the wearisome and the admirable · and citing Jing 〔Daojing〕· Tai 〔Shentai〕· the Tripiṭaka-master 〔Xuanzang〕); Kuiji's Concise Compendium, the end of fascicle 8 〔T43 0119a23–0119b17〕 glosses only the fine details of the contemplation of the impure in purifying the obstructions (the nine preparatory efforts / tranquillity, exertion, equanimity / correct clearing-away / the middle uddāna / the path of yoked working / the four kinds of attention / the goldsmith simile — the Concise Compendium passes over all of these without gloss). Jinaputra's Commentary T1580 has no line-by-line dedicated gloss. ★ A distinguishing note among the ancient masters (important · marked as it stands): this treatise's "cultivation of attention" = the four kinds of attention (mind-training · mind-moistening · pliancy-producing · pure-knowledge-and-vision); the "fifth, cultivation of attention" glossed by Kuiji in the Concise Compendium, fascicle 9, refers in fact to the seven attentions of dispassion (apprehending-the-aspect · resolute conviction · seclusion · joy-gathering · investigation · culmination of effort · fruit of the culmination of effort) 〔T43 0119c05 「今解第五修作意」 tr. "now glossing the fifth, cultivation of attention"〕 — the same name, a different referent; Kuiji gathers the "gateway of the cultivation of attention" under the later dispassion passage, not glossing this leaf's four kinds of attention. Its difference is recorded, not confounded. Where the ancient masters are "brief" on this leaf, marked as it stands: the seventh and eighth preparatory efforts (Dunlun "may be known" · no gloss) · the four names of the four kinds of attention (Dunlun does not gloss them one by one) · the painter simile / the goldsmith simile (Dunlun only marks the "dharma · simile · conjoining" structure · does not gloss the simile-image) · Kuiji passes over most (see above).
I. Doctrinal-Outline Placement
| Outline system | Placement of this passage |
|---|---|
| Xuanzang T1579, the seventeen stages of the Basic Section | The thirteenth, the Śrāvaka Stage · the Third Yoga-Station · the tail of sub-section 6 + sub-section 7 + the head of sub-section 8: the nine preparatory efforts of the bright class (→ "such is what is called one-pointedness of mind" concludes sub-section 6) + purifying the obstructions (sub-section 7) + the middle uddāna + the four kinds of attention in the cultivation of attention (sub-section 8 is raised) 〔T30 0455b16–0459b23〕 |
| The treatise-text itself | The nine bright-class preparatory efforts (corresponding · repeated-practice · unslackened · unerring · timely 〔tranquillity, insight, exertion, equanimity〕· understanding · insatiable · yoke-not-cast-off · correct 〔the five correct clearings-away · how one practices · the painter simile〕) → the eighteen preparatory efforts, dark and bright → concluded in one-pointedness of mind; purifying the obstructions (the four causal factors · the four obstructions 〔faint-heartedness · covering-over · discursive thought · self-exaltation〕· thoroughly knowing the intrinsic nature, causes and conditions, and faults · cultivating the counteraction · tranquillity and insight being many · the path of yoked working); the middle uddāna; the cultivation of attention (the four kinds of attention · the four grounds of the wearisome · the three grounds of the admirable · the goldsmith simile) |
| Dunlun's Notes | 「白各九別、列白品九名、相對辨異;次、隨別解釋白品九種;後、結二品辨其順逆總束」 tr. "the bright, each of nine distinctions; listing the nine names of the bright class, distinguishing them in mutual comparison; next, separately glossing the nine bright kinds one by one; last, gathering the two classes to distinguish their concord and discord, binding all together" 〔T42 0465a09〕; the path of yoked working divided into four points, 「第四明止觀二道雙運分齊」 tr. "the fourth clarifies the measure of the yoked working of the two paths, tranquillity and insight" 〔0466b〕; the middle uddāna, 「今此四頌但是中頌……初三頌頌心一境性、後一頌頌淨障」 tr. "these four verses now are but the middle verses … the first three verses versify one-pointedness of mind, the last one verse versifies purifying the obstructions" 〔0466b28〕 |
| Kuiji's Concise Compendium | Marks only 「論『云何勤修不淨』,此第四、淨障也」 tr. "the treatise says 'what is it diligently to cultivate the impure' — this is the fourth, purifying the obstructions" 〔T43 0119a23〕; its "fifth, cultivation of attention" refers separately to the seven attentions of dispassion 〔0119c05〕 (see the distinguishing note in the preamble) |
II. Alternate Translations · Collation of In-Treatise Parallels
- Alternate translation: Paramārtha's Treatise on the Seventeen Stages, fascicle 30, corresponds · no transmitted witness in Chinese (lost) · left blank.
- ★ In-treatise parallel (in the Section on Ascertainment · this passage truly has a correspondence): unlike the nine-stations-of-mind passage (no parallel), this leaf's marks of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity have a word-for-word parallel in the Section on Ascertainment's Śrāvaka Stage 〔T30 0676c18 · the five kinds of non-heedlessness (the second time of concentration)〕: 「於時時間應修止相,於時時間應修舉相,於時時間應修捨相。彼於如是止舉捨相得善巧已,由下劣心慮恐下劣便正修舉,由掉舉心慮恐掉舉便修內止,心得平等便修上捨。」 tr. "at each and every moment one should cultivate the mark of tranquillity, at each and every moment one should cultivate the mark of exertion, at each and every moment one should cultivate the mark of equanimity. He, having gained skill in such marks of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity, by an inferior mind, fearing inferiority, duly cultivates exertion; by an agitated mind, fearing agitation, cultivates inner tranquillity; the mind gaining evenness, cultivates the higher equanimity." (Tranquillity ↔ agitation · exertion ↔ inferior sinking · equanimity ↔ evenness — corresponding meaning for meaning with this leaf's times of tranquillity, insight, exertion, and equanimity.) And the Section on the Gathering of Events, fascicle 97 〔T30 0855b25〕, plainly points to this leaf as the source of the marks of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity: 「此中依諸止舉捨相修習知時,如聲聞地及三摩呬多地已辯其相」 tr. "here, cultivating in dependence on the several marks of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity and knowing the time, as the Śrāvaka Stage and the Stage of Meditative Equipoise have already discriminated their marks."
Collation (full enumeration of the Taishō base-text's collation notes)
This passage (0455b16–0459b23) carries in the Taishō base-text's manuscript-witness collation notes a total of 30 notes (including 2 CBETA character-emendations) + 1 Taishō editor's original note at the fascicle-end (although the <app> per-note collation elements number 0, the base-text's collation notes are recorded in note form — "zero collation elements" does not equal "no collation notes"). The base text follows the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō's original print is also recorded); not a single note in this passage rises to a critical-edition emendation (where CBETA emends a character, both readings are recorded), and variants are recorded alongside for the record:
| Note # | Anchor | Base 【大 Taishō】 | Variant (witness) | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0455006 | 0455b19 | 無倒 | 不緩【明】 | The nine preparatory efforts · unerring (transposed with unslackened) |
| 0455007 | 0455b19 | 不緩 | 無倒【明】 | The nine preparatory efforts · unslackened (transposed with unerring) |
| 0455008 | 0455b22 | 勝* | 昇【宋】【元】【宮】,升【甲】*【聖】,什【明】* | The nine-preparatory-efforts passage (a variant in four transmissions) |
| 0455009 | 0455c08 | 蓋 | 善【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The purifying-the-obstructions passage (蓋 / 善) |
| 0455010 | 0455c18 | 儀 | 議【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | The purifying-the-obstructions passage (儀 / 議) |
| 0455011 | 0455c22 | 痰 | 淡【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | The mark of the obstruction · bodily illness (痰 / 淡) |
| 0455012 | 0455c23 | 成 | 或【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The purifying-the-obstructions passage (成 / 或) |
| 0455013 | 0455c25 | 蠚 | 螫【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The obstruction-mark simile (蠚 / 螫) |
| 0455014 | 0455c25 | 類等 | 等類【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The obstruction-mark passage |
| 0456001 | 0456a02 | 從 | 於【宋】【元】 | The purifying-the-obstructions passage (從 / 於) |
| 0456002 | 0456a08 | 尊 | 等【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The purifying-the-obstructions passage (尊 / 等) |
| 0456003 | 0456a10 | (於時…相)八字 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | The sentence on cultivating the mark of insight (the manuscript witnesses drop eight characters) |
| 0456004 | 0456b27 | 寤 | 悟【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The purifying-the-obstructions passage (寤 / 悟) |
| 0456005 | 0456c04 | 數正除遣 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | The clearing-away sentence (the manuscript witnesses drop four characters) |
| 0457001 | 0457a19 | 正 | 次【聖】 | The preparatory-effort passage (正 / 次) |
| 0457002 | 0457b02 | 八 | 八事【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The preparatory-effort passage |
| 0457003 | 0457c07 | 習 | 集【宋】【元】【宮】 | The preparatory-effort passage (習 / 集) |
| 0457004 | 0457c24 | 更 | 便【聖】 | The preparatory-effort passage (更 / 便) |
| 0457005 | 0457c27 | 如〔大〕→知【CB】【麗-CB】【宮】 | 如【大】 | The preparatory-effort passage · CBETA emendation (the base text follows CBETA as 知 · the Taishō original print is 如 · both readings recorded) |
| 0458001 | 0458a03 | 如 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The preparatory-effort passage |
| 0458002 | 0458a07 | 得 | 復【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | The preparatory-effort passage (得 / 復) |
| 0458003 | 0458a24 | 念 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 | The preparatory-effort passage |
| 0458004 | 0458b01 | 相 | 〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The preparatory-effort passage |
| 0458005 | 0458b28 | 安 | 安心【聖】 | The preparatory-effort passage |
| 0459001 | 0459a22 | 令 | 念【宋】 | The preparatory-effort passage (令 / 念) |
| 0459002 | 0459a22 | 心趣 | 向【宮】 | The preparatory-effort passage (心趣 / 向) |
| 0459003 | 0459b03 | 勝 | 昇【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 | The preparatory-effort passage (勝 / 昇) |
| 0459004 | 0459b04 | 第〔大〕→弟【CB】【宋】【元】【宮】【聖】 | 第【大】 | The fascicle-end · CBETA emendation (the base text follows CBETA as 弟 · the Taishō original print is 第 · both readings recorded) |
| 0459005 | 0459b04 | 鍊 | 練【宋】【元】【聖】 | The fascicle-end passage (鍊 / 練) |
| 0459006 | 0459b16 | 辦 | 辦沙門玄袞敬造【聖】 | The fascicle-end · the Sheng-edition colophon (below 辦 stands the name of the sutra-copyist) |
| 0459007 | The fascicle-end (0459) | Taishō editor's original note | Below this, the Sheng edition has the votive text of Empress Kōmyō (at the side of the end of fascicle 31 · not adopted) | Not adopted |
Note: all 30 notes follow the CBETA character-readings (wherever CBETA restores a reading following the Korean canon and the like, the Taishō original print is also recorded); none rises to a critical-edition emendation. Those bearing * are asterisked in the Taishō original column, and are reproduced as such. 0457005 · 0459004 are CBETA emendations (the base text follows CBETA as 「知」「弟」· the Taishō original prints 「如」「第」· both readings recorded). 0459006 is the Sheng-edition sutra-copying colophon · 0459007 is the Taishō editor's original note (the Sheng-edition votive text at the fascicle-end), recorded and noted. Besides these, the ancient masters' citation-variants (Kuiji 「惡嗅/生嗅」「血罐 𭥓·missing character CB05005」) are not manuscript-witness collation notes and are only recorded.
III. Scriptural Grounds for the Sacred Teaching's Meaning (the Eye · Heavy — the Marks of Tranquillity, Exertion, and Equanimity · the Path of Yoked Working · One-pointedness of Mind, Continuing the Consciousness-Only Meaning of the Saṃdhinirmocana, the Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis)
Continuing the consciousness-only eye of doctrine of the nine-stations-of-mind passage (13-03-02), this leaf's marks of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity · the path of yoked working are all connected meaning for meaning with the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, the Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis. Two scriptural grounds are recorded:
(1) The mark of tranquillity · the mark of exertion · the mark of equanimity · the same meaning for meaning as the scripture 〔Saṃdhinirmocana T16 0699b22〕 — Maitreya asks about the marks of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity, and the World-Honored One answers: 「若心掉舉或恐掉舉時,諸可厭法作意及彼無間心作意,是名止相。若心沈沒或恐沈沒時,諸可欣法作意及彼心相作意,是名舉相。若於一向止道、或於一向觀道、或於雙運轉道,二隨煩惱所染污時,諸無功用作意及心任運轉中所有作意,是名捨相。」 tr. "when the mind is agitated or when one fears agitation, the attention upon the several dharmas that may be found wearisome and the attention of the mind immediately upon them — this is named the mark of tranquillity. When the mind sinks or when one fears sinking, the attention upon the several dharmas that may be found admirable and the attention upon the mind-mark of them — this is named the mark of exertion. When, whether on the path of tranquillity alone, or on the path of insight alone, or on the path of the yoked working, one is defiled by the two secondary afflictions, the several attentions of no-exertion and all the attention within the mind's spontaneous turning — this is named the mark of equanimity." Corresponding meaning for meaning with this leaf's "when the mind is agitated is the time to cultivate tranquillity · when the mind sinks is the time to cultivate insight (exertion) · when the agitation has been liberated is the time to cultivate equanimity" (0455–0456 of the treatise).
(2) The path of yoked working = one-pointedness of mind = penetrating that the image is consciousness-only (the eye of doctrine · the knot tied) 〔Saṃdhinirmocana T16 0698b17〕 — Maitreya asks 「齊何當言奢摩他毘鉢舍那和合俱轉」 tr. "to what point should one say that tranquillity and insight join and turn together," and the World-Honored One answers 「若正思惟心一境性」 tr. "if one correctly reflects on one-pointedness of mind"; and asked 「云何心一境性」 tr. "what is one-pointedness of mind," answers 「謂通達三摩地所行影像唯是其識;或通達此已,復思惟如性」 tr. "namely, penetrating that the image ranged over in meditative concentration is only its own consciousness; or, having penetrated this, further reflecting on its suchness-nature." This leaf's path of yoked working (the ninth of the nine marks of mental settling, meditative equipoise · cultivating the higher wisdom in the contemplation of dharmas · turning without exertion · 0459 of the treatise) is precisely the thoroughgoing measure of this "one-pointedness of mind · penetrating that the image is consciousness-only" — the object of the śrāvaka's yoked working of tranquillity and insight is adjudged by the scripture itself to be manifested by consciousness-only, continuing the eye of doctrine of the nine-stations-of-mind passage.
〔Note〕 This leaf's consciousness-only eye of doctrine — tranquillity, exertion, equanimity · the path of yoked working — is grounded wholly in the Saṃdhinirmocana, the Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis, the scriptural text itself (spoken by the Buddha · translated by Xuanzang), not modern interpretation; the scriptural ground is recorded to display the eye of doctrine, and no modern scholar is cited. The Section on Ascertainment's Bodhisattva Stage also cites this Saṃdhinirmocana passage on the marks of tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity word for word (the inner witness of the Maitreya-Asaṅga transmission), and it is only recorded, not separately adjudicated.
IV. The Explanations of the Various Masters (the Ancients · Only Recorded, Not Adjudicated)
The Nine Bright-Class Preparatory Efforts · Doctrinal Outline + Each Preparatory Effort (Dunlun · the seventh and eighth "may be known")
〔Dunlun T42 0465a09 · 0465a17〕:
Doctrinal outline: 「白各九別、列白品九名、相對辨異;次、隨別解釋白品九種;後、結二品辨其順逆總束。」 tr. "the bright, each of nine distinctions; listing the nine names of the bright class, distinguishing them in mutual comparison; next, separately glossing the nine bright kinds one by one; last, gathering the two classes to distinguish their concord and discord, binding all together." Gloss by each: 「一、想應加行者〔Dunlun writes 「想」〕,謂貪欲者修不淨觀等,藥病相應故。二、串習加行者,於止觀品曾多習乃至少分……三、不緩加行,謂起無間殷重;二修和敬業者,謂六和敬。四、無倒加行,如師開悟即如是學、離自慢等。五、應時加行,修止舉捨次應其時,又能了知止觀舉捨四法體相及時,止體即九相心住。」 tr. "First, corresponding preparatory effort 〔Dunlun writes 想 for 相〕 means one who acts from sensual greed cultivates the contemplation of the impure and the like, because the medicine corresponds to the disease. Second, repeated-practice preparatory effort means, within the class of tranquillity and insight, one has practiced much before, if only in some small part … Third, unslackened preparatory effort means giving rise to what is uninterrupted and earnest; as for cultivating the duties of harmony and respect, this is the six [kinds of] harmony and respect. Fourth, unerring preparatory effort means, as the teacher awakens one, just so one learns, departing from self-conceit and the rest. Fifth, timely preparatory effort means cultivating tranquillity, exertion, and equanimity each according to its time, and being able to know the essence-marks and the times of the four dharmas — tranquillity, insight, exertion, and equanimity; the essence of tranquillity is precisely the nine marks of mental settling." 〔Note〕 The seventh, insatiable, and the eighth, yoke-not-cast-off, preparatory efforts — Dunlun marks only "the seventh and eighth may be known" · with no separate gloss 〔0465b23〕.
★ The Marks of Tranquillity · Insight · Exertion · Equanimity (Dunlun · citing the two masters Jing and Tai on the mark of equanimity)
〔Dunlun T42 0465a25 · 0465b13〕:
The twofold mark of tranquillity: 「止相有二:一、所緣相,即是止品所知本質同分影像,是止所緣相;二、因緣相……依奢摩他熏習修止,恐止心沈沒,為令離沈得清淨故修觀加行,望清淨止為因緣相。」 tr. "The mark of tranquillity is twofold: first, the object-mark, that is, the image corresponding in kind to the essential thing known within the class of tranquillity, which is the object-mark of tranquillity; second, the causal-condition-mark … in dependence on a mind perfumed by tranquillity one cultivates tranquillity, and fearing the tranquil mind will sink, in order to make it depart from sinking and gain purity one cultivates the preparatory effort of insight, which, with respect to pure tranquillity, is the causal-condition-mark." The twofold mark of insight: 「云何為觀?謂四行三門六事差別所緣觀行,即次前卷四種毘鉢舍那……觀相有二:一、所緣相,謂觀品所知本質事同分影像;二、因緣相……恐觀心太浮掉動,為令離掉得清淨故修奢摩他加行。」 tr. "What is insight? It is the practice of insight upon objects distinguished by the four practices, the three gateways, and the six matters, that is, the four kinds of insight of the immediately preceding fascicle … The mark of insight is twofold: first, the object-mark, namely the image corresponding in kind to the essential thing known within the class of insight; second, the causal-condition-mark … fearing the insight-mind will be too buoyant and agitatedly moving, in order to make it depart from agitation and gain purity one cultivates the preparatory effort of tranquillity." The mark of equanimity 〔Jing / Tai〕: 「於止觀品調柔正直等者,止觀均平名調柔正直。景云:極捨沈掉令心上捨,若太過精進則心浮動,故不得太過精進。泰云:於所緣境極離止舉,名增上緣。捨時,謂於止觀品創離掉舉是修捨時;亦應言:於止觀品所有沈沒心已解脫,是修捨時。」 tr. "As for 'being supple, upright, and so forth within the class of tranquillity and insight' — the even balance of tranquillity and insight is named being supple and upright. Jing says: casting off sinking and agitation utterly so as to let the mind be released above; if there is excessive vigor the mind is buoyant and moving, and so one may not put forth excessive vigor. Tai says: departing utterly from tranquillity and exertion with respect to the object-domain is named the dominant condition. As for the time for equanimity — that within the class of tranquillity and insight one has just departed from agitation is the time to cultivate equanimity; one should also say: that within the class of tranquillity and insight all sinking of mind has been liberated is the time to cultivate equanimity."
Understanding Preparatory Effort · Casting off the Image and Taking the Essence as Object (Dunlun · the Tripiṭaka-master)
〔Dunlun T42 0465b22〕:
「三藏云:棄捨定中所緣影像,乃緣本〔如〕林中骨鎖本質。」 tr. "The Tripiṭaka-master says: casting off the image taken as object within concentration, one takes as object the essence — as it were, the essential [thing] of the chain of bones in the forest." (A gloss on understanding preparatory effort's "casting off the image of meditative concentration and reflecting on the essential object proper to the non-concentrated ground.")
Correct Preparatory Effort · the Five Kinds of Correct Clearing-Away · How One Practices (Dunlun · selecting inwardly-gathering / not-minding)
〔Dunlun T42 0465b24 · 0465c16〕:
「正除遣……簡取正明中:雖遍安立一切所緣正除遣相總有五種,然此義中意取內攝其心、不念作意二種……是故後三(於餘作意·對治作意·無相界作意)不順除遣正加行事。」 tr. "Correct clearing-away … in selecting what is properly clarified: although the correct clearing-away marks universally established upon all objects come to five kinds in all, yet in this meaning what is intended is the two kinds inwardly gathering the mind and the attention of not-minding … and so the latter three (attention upon another · the attention of counteraction · the attention of the markless element) do not accord with the business of correct clearing-away preparatory effort." How one practices: 「『復行有相有分別不淨等境』者,此明由不念作意而取外相不淨等境;『云何而行』下,釋不捨不取之義——由於所緣止行轉故,不名為捨。」 tr. "As for 'one also practices the having-mark, having-discrimination objects — the impure and the like,' this clarifies that by the attention of not-minding one takes up the outer marks — the impure and the like; and below 'how does one practice,' it glosses the meaning of neither casting off nor taking up — because the practice of tranquillity turns upon the object, it is not named casting-off." 〔The meaning of "not taking up" follows the treatise-text itself (source: 「即於所緣不作相故、無分別故、不名為取」 tr. "because upon the object one makes no mark, and does not discriminate, it is not named taking-up") · not Dunlun's words here, analyzed out and assigned to the treatise-text.〕 〔Note〕 The painter's-apprentice simile: Dunlun marks only the "raising a simile to display it · conjoining the simile" structure 〔0465c21〕· does not gloss the painter simile-image.
Purifying the Obstructions · the Four Obstructions (Dunlun glosses faint-heartedness / discursive thought · covering-over and self-exaltation entered under the counteraction)
〔Dunlun T42 0466a09〕:
「怯弱障者,謂於涅槃出離法及於世出世道遠離之法勤修行時,於雜染法有戀慕、不樂、希望、憂惱,故心怯弱。尋思障者,謂欲恚害等尋思……修習對治中,初明怯弱治,總用隨念為對治;次明別治:貪蓋及欲尋,不淨想治;恚蓋恚尋,修慈為治;惛沈睡眠,思明相為治;掉舉惡作親眷尋等,修止行寂靜。」 tr. "The obstruction of faint-heartedness means, when one diligently cultivates the dharmas of nirvāṇa and renunciation and the dharmas of seclusion on the mundane and supramundane path, there is longing, displeasure, hankering, and grief toward defiled dharmas, and so the mind is faint-hearted. The obstruction of discursive thought means the discursive thoughts of desire, ill-will, harm, and the rest … Within cultivating the counteraction, first it clarifies the counteraction for faint-heartedness, using recollection overall as the counteraction; next it clarifies the separate counteractions: for the hindrance of greed and the discursive thought of desire, the perception of the impure counteracts; for the hindrance of ill-will and the discursive thought of ill-will, cultivating loving-kindness counteracts; for dullness-and-drowsiness, reflecting on the mark of brightness counteracts; for agitation-and-remorse, the discursive thought of kin and the like, one cultivates the practice of tranquillity and quiet." 〔Note〕 The obstruction of covering-over · the obstruction of self-exaltation — Dunlun does not separately set up a gloss of their names-and-meanings · they are gathered into the list of counteractions (only recorded · not supplemented); Kuiji on this leaf glosses only the fine details of the contemplation of the impure in purifying the obstructions (「惡嗅/生嗅」· the blood-jar 𭥓 · the six items of view / collation).
★ The Path of the Yoked Working of Tranquillity and Insight · the Transformation of the Basis (Dunlun · the fourth of the four-point analysis)
〔Dunlun T42 0466a25 · 0466b01〕:
「正修行者下,第二明由觀串習增長廣大令止亦然;身心輕安離於麁重名轉依,心一境性離散亂名得轉依,依於所知境現量智生。……問齊何當言奢摩他毘鉢舍那二種俱轉下,第四明止觀二道雙運分齊:九相心住中第九等持住(亦名等引住),用此為依於世俗勝義諦法觀中修增上慧……由多修習、不由功用、止觀雙轉。」 tr. "Below 'for one who correctly cultivates,' the second clarifies that by the repeated practice of insight increasing and growing vast, tranquillity too is made so; pliancy of body and mind departing from coarseness-and-heaviness is named the transformation of the basis, one-pointedness of mind departing from scatteredness is named gaining the transformation of the basis, and in dependence on the object-domain known, direct-perception knowledge arises. … Below 'asked, to what point should one say that the two, tranquillity and insight, turn together,' the fourth clarifies the measure of the yoked working of the two paths, tranquillity and insight: the ninth, the abiding of concentration (also named the abiding of even-drawing), within the nine marks of mental settling, and taking this as support, one cultivates the higher wisdom within the contemplation of the dharmas of the conventional and ultimate truths … by much cultivating, not by exertion, tranquillity and insight turn together."
The Middle Uddāna · the Middle Verses (Dunlun)
〔Dunlun T42 0466b28〕:
「今此四頌但是中頌,以安立中有其五義,餘有第五修作意門未解,舉此頌重收前義,故名為中。今此四頌頌前二門:初三頌頌心一境性,後之一頌頌於淨障;初一頌頌三門六事差別所緣,次二頌頌九種加行。」 tr. "These four verses now are but the middle verses, for within the establishing there are five meanings, and there remains the fifth, the gateway of the cultivation of attention, not yet glossed; raising these verses to gather up again the prior meaning, they are named the middle. These four verses now versify the prior two gateways: the first three verses versify one-pointedness of mind, and the last one verse versifies purifying the obstructions; the first verse versifies the objects distinguished by the three gateways and six matters, the next two verses versify the nine preparatory efforts."
The Cultivation of Attention · the Wearisome and the Admirable (Dunlun · Jing's alternate account)
〔Dunlun T42 0466c16〕:
「今牒第三〔瑜伽〕於所安立五義中,心一境性普遍緣故……可厭患處略有四:一自衰損、二他衰損(會遇現前)、三自興盛、四他興盛(離變壞)。可欣有三:一隨念三寶……二隨念學處清淨尸羅清淨……三於自所證差別深生信解無怯弱處。」 tr. "Now taking up the third 〔yoga-station〕, because within the five established meanings one-pointedness of mind takes them as object universally … The grounds of the wearisome are in brief four: first, the decline of oneself; second, the decline of another (met with, present before one); third, the flourishing of oneself; fourth, the flourishing of another (departed and altered-and-ruined). The admirable are three: first, recollecting the Three Jewels … second, recollecting the purity of the points of training and the purity of moral discipline … third, the ground of deeply giving rise to conviction, without faint-heartedness, toward the difference of what one has oneself realized." 〔Jing · the alternate account〕: 「異門者,新有所證、心王欣樂於舊證,故名異門。」 tr. "As for the alternate account: there being a new realization, the mind-king rejoices with delight in the former realization, and so it is named the alternate account." 〔Note〕 The four names of the four kinds of attention (mind-training · mind-moistening · pliancy-producing · pure-knowledge-and-vision), Dunlun does not gloss one by one; the goldsmith simile he marks only by the "dharma · simile · conjoining" structure 〔0467a11〕· does not gloss the simile-image.
〔Heading note: Dunlun · Kuiji · Daojing 〔Jing〕· Shentai 〔Tai〕· Xuanzang 〔the Tripiṭaka-master〕 are all ancient masters. Kuiji's "fifth, cultivation of attention" refers separately to the seven attentions of dispassion (the preamble's distinguishing note) · not this leaf's four kinds of attention. The two masters, where they are "brief" on this leaf, are marked as it stands · not supplemented. Jinaputra has no line-by-line dedicated gloss.〕
V. Terminology (漢 / Ancient-Transmitted Sanskrit · Pronunciation Aid)
| 漢 | Transmitted Sanskrit (transliteration · pronunciation aid) | Sense |
|---|---|---|
| 三摩呬多 | samāhita | Meditative equipoise (the ninth of the nine marks of mental settling · another name for the abiding of concentration) |
| 奢摩他/毘鉢舍那/三摩地 | śamatha / vipaśyanā / samādhi | Tranquillity / insight / concentration (the common transliterations of Xuanzang's translation) |
| 鄔波索迦 | upāsaka | The layman who draws near-and-serves (a male householder-devotee) |
| 臘縛 | lava | The name of a time-division (a fraction of a moment) |
| 白品九加行/止觀舉捨/正除遣/淨障四障/轉依/雙運轉道/調練滋潤輕安淨智見四作意 | — (rendered by meaning · left blank) | Meaning-rendered technical names · not ancient-masters' transliterations |
Sanskrit only from the ancient masters' transliterations; the IAST of meaning-rendered technical names is left blank (per the covenant of the ancient-transmitted Sanskrit). 三摩呬多 · 奢摩他 · 毘鉢舍那 and the like are the common transliterations of Xuanzang's translation.
VI. Similes · Rhetoric
(1) The painter's-apprentice simile (established by the treatise-text itself · the ancient masters mark only the structure) 〔T30 0457a〕 — by the painter's apprentice 「諦觀作形相→作已尋即除毀→既毀復作,如如除毀數數更作,後後形相轉明轉淨究竟顯現」 tr. "contemplating and making the shape → having made it, straightaway wiping it out → having wiped it out, making it again; thus wiping out and repeatedly making it again, the later and later shapes turn clearer, turn purer, and are thoroughly manifested," it figures correct preparatory effort's "repeatedly arousing resolute conviction · repeatedly correctly clearing away"; if one does not repeatedly wipe out, but only paints over again and again, the shape can never have clarity and purity. Dunlun marks only the "raising a simile · conjoining the simile" structure 〔T42 0465c21〕· does not gloss the simile-image; the meaning follows the treatise-text itself. (2) The gold-and-silver-smith simile (established by the treatise-text itself · the ancient masters mark only the structure) 〔T30 0459b03〕 — by the goldsmith 「時時燒鍊令棄垢穢·時時投清冷水令調柔堪任·乃隨所樂作莊嚴具」 tr. "at each and every moment smelting and refining it so as to make it cast off impurity and filth · at each and every moment casting it into cool clear water so as to make it supple and fit · and then, following what he takes pleasure in, fashioning ornaments," it figures the cultivation of attention's "the mind-training (casting off the filth / weariness) · the mind-moistening (casting into water / rejoicing) making the mind supple and fit, and, following what one takes pleasure in, accomplishing within the class of tranquillity and insight." Dunlun marks only the "dharma · simile · conjoining" structure 〔T42 0467a11〕· does not gloss the simile-image. (3) The mirror simile · the image is consciousness-only (Saṃdhinirmocana · the Eye · Heavy · continuing the previous leaf) — this leaf's "image corresponding in kind" as the object of tranquillity and insight inherits the nine-stations-of-mind passage's Saṃdhinirmocana mirror simile "the image is only what consciousness manifests" (13-03-02 Heading VI), and is not repeated here · see the previous leaf.
VII. Cross-Reading (Carrying Forward)
- Inheriting sub-section 6, one-pointedness · concluded on this leaf: the nine bright-class preparatory efforts are the in-cultivation preparatory efforts of one-pointedness of mind, and the treatise, reaching 「黑白十八加行……如是名為心一境性」 tr. "the eighteen preparatory efforts, dark and bright … such is what is called one-pointedness of mind," concludes sub-section 6 (opened at 13-03-02, concluded at 13-03-03; the meaning of one-pointedness spans the two leaves).
- The marks of tranquillity, exertion, equanimity · the path of yoked working → the Saṃdhinirmocana, the Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis + the Section on Ascertainment · the Section on the Gathering of Events (scriptural ground / in-treatise-parallel cross-reading): for the scriptural ground of the marks of tranquillity, exertion, equanimity · the path of yoked working, see Heading III (Saṃdhinirmocana); for the in-treatise parallel, see Heading II (the Section on Ascertainment's Śrāvaka Stage 0676c · the Section on the Gathering of Events, fascicle 97, pointing back to this leaf as source). This śrāvaka's yoked working of tranquillity and insight · the consciousness-only eye of doctrine, are attested within and without the scripture.
- The cultivation of attention (sub-section 8 is raised · the four kinds of attention) → one who is at first cultivating the work (13-03-04 · sub-section 8 continues): this leaf's cultivation of attention sets up the frame of the four kinds of attention (mind-training · mind-moistening · pliancy-producing · pure-knowledge-and-vision) and the wearisome, the admirable, and the goldsmith simile; after the boundary of the third fascicle (0459b24), 13-03-04 continues to speak of how one who is at first cultivating the work duly establishes himself and cultivates in dependence on this cultivation of attention. A distinguishing note: this treatise's "cultivation of attention · four kinds of attention" ≠ what Kuiji's Concise Compendium refers to as "the cultivation of attention = the seven attentions of dispassion" (the preamble · Heading IV distinguishing note).
VIII. Placement of the Critical Editions
- Base text: CBETA T30n1579, fascicles 31–32 · the Third Yoga-Station · the tail of sub-section 6 + sub-section 7 + the head of sub-section 8 (the nine bright-class preparatory efforts ~ the cultivation of attention, the goldsmith simile) 0455b16–0459b23.
- Ancient-master page-anchors (each re-verified word for word against the canonical original): Dunlun's Notes, the latter part of fascicle 7, from T42 0465a09 (the doctrinal outline 0465a09 · the twofold mark of tranquillity 0465a25 · the mark of equanimity, Jing and Tai 0465b13 · understanding, the Tripiṭaka-master 0465b22 · correct clearing-away, the selecting 0465b24 · the four obstructions of purifying the obstructions 0466a09 · the path of yoked working, the transformation of the basis 0466b01 · the middle uddāna 0466b28 · the cultivation of attention, the wearisome and the admirable 0466c16). Jinaputra T30 has no line-by-line dedicated gloss.
- Scriptural doctrine-anchor (each re-verified against the canonical original): the Saṃdhinirmocana-sūtra, the Chapter on the Yoga of Analysis, T16n0676 — the marks of tranquillity, exertion, equanimity 0699b22 · the path of yoked working = one-pointedness of mind, penetrating that the image is consciousness-only 0698b17.
- In-treatise parallel: the Section on Ascertainment's Śrāvaka Stage T30 0676c18 「止舉捨相·五種不放逸」 word-for-word parallel · the Section on the Gathering of Events, fascicle 97, 0855b25, pointing back to this leaf as source (word-for-word verified against the manuscript).
- Collation: this passage's manuscript-witness collation notes in the Taishō original number 30, fully enumerated (including the CBETA emendations 0457005 如/知 · 0459004 第/弟, two notes, both readings recorded) + 1 Taishō editor's original note at the fascicle-end (Heading II · the base text follows the CBETA character-readings · no note rises to a critical-edition emendation); "zero collation elements" does not equal "no collation notes" (the original collation notes are recorded in note form); the ancient masters' citation-variants (Kuiji 惡嗅/生嗅) are not manuscript-witness collation notes and are only recorded; Paramārtha's fascicle-30 correspondence is lost · left blank. Missing character: Kuiji's blood-jar passage 「𭥓」 CB05005 (U+2D953 · belongs to Kuiji's impure passage · at the margin of this leaf's citation · already marked).