華嚴經 品十六 梵行品Avataṃsaka Sūtra · The Practice of Brahmacarya
已經染衣出家了,還要問一句:「云何而得梵行清淨」。
法慧沒有給定義,給了十個地方讓人去找:身、身業、語、語業、意、意業、佛、法、僧、戒。找法只有一句——若這一樣就是梵行,會怎麼樣?
於是身成了死屍蟲聚,身業成了行住坐臥,語成了唇舌喉吻,意成了眠夢幻術。連佛、法、僧、戒也逐項追問:色是佛嗎?涅槃是法嗎?預流果是僧嗎?壇場是戒嗎?
十處都空了。結論卻不是沒有梵行——「梵行法不可得故……如是名為清淨梵行」。
古德說得直:戒也是眾緣所成,起一個持戒的心去抓它,就叫迷倒。
最後一句是這一品的眼:「初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」。
澄觀只改了一個字的讀法——這個『發』是開發之發,不是發起之發。
不是趕路趕得快。是本來沒有路要趕。
The robe has already been dyed, the household already left — and still there is one more sentence to ask: “how does one attain purity of brahmacarya?”
Dharma Wisdom gave no definition. He gave ten places in which to go looking: body, bodily action, speech, verbal action, thought, mental action, the Buddha, the Dharma, the Saṅgha, the precepts. And the way of looking is a single sentence — if this one thing were brahmacarya, what would follow?
So the body turns out to be a corpse and a swarm of worms; bodily action turns out to be walking, standing, sitting, lying down; speech turns out to be lips, tongue, throat, and mouth; thought turns out to be sleep, dreams, and conjuring tricks. Even the Buddha, the Dharma, the Saṅgha, and the precepts are pressed item by item: is form the Buddha? Is nirvāṇa the Dharma? Is the fruit of stream-entry the Saṅgha? Is the ordination platform the precepts?
All ten places come up empty. Yet the conclusion is not that there is no brahmacarya — “because the dharma that is brahmacarya cannot be obtained … this is what is called pure brahmacarya.”
The ancient worthies say it flatly: the precepts too are made of many conditions; to rouse a mind that keeps the precepts and grab hold of them is precisely what is called delusion turned upside down.
The last sentence is the eye of this chapter: “at the time of the first arousing of the mind one attains unsurpassed perfect awakening.”
Chengguan altered the reading of one word only — this “arousing” is the arousing of what opens out, not the arousing of what starts up.
It is not that the road is being travelled fast. It is that there was never a road to travel.
〔T10 0088〕 爾時,正念天子白法慧菩薩言:「佛子!一切世界諸菩薩眾,依如來教,染衣出家。云何而得梵行清淨,從菩薩位逮於無上菩提之道?」 法慧菩薩言: 「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩修梵行時,應以十法而為所緣,作意觀察。所謂:身、身業、語、語業、意、意業、佛、法、僧、戒。應如是觀:為身是梵行耶?乃至戒是梵行耶?若身是梵行者,當知梵行則為非善、則為非法、則為渾濁、則為臭惡、則為不淨、則為可厭、則為違逆、則為雜染、則為死屍、則為蟲聚。若身業是梵行者,梵行則是行住坐臥、左右顧視、屈伸俯仰。若語是梵行者,梵行則是音聲風息、唇舌喉吻、吐納抑縱、高低清濁。若語業是梵行者,梵行則是起居問訊、略說、廣說、諭說、直說、讚說、毀說、安立說、隨俗說、顯了說。若意是梵行者,梵行則應是覺、是觀、是分別、是種種分別、是憶念、是種種憶念、是思惟、是種種思惟、是幻術、是眠夢。若意業是梵行者,當知梵行則是思想、寒熱、飢渴、苦樂、憂喜。若佛是梵行者,為色是佛耶?受是佛耶?想是佛耶?行是佛耶?識是佛耶?為相是佛耶?好是佛耶?神通是佛耶?業行是佛耶?果報是佛耶?若法是梵行者,為寂滅是法耶?涅槃是法耶?不生是法耶?不起是法耶?不可說是法耶?無分別是法耶?無所行是法耶?不合集是法耶?若僧是梵行者,為預流向是僧耶?預流果是僧耶?一來向是僧耶?一來果是僧耶?不還向是僧耶?不還果是僧耶?阿羅漢向是僧耶?阿羅漢果是僧耶?三明是僧耶?六通是僧耶?若戒是梵行者,為壇場是戒耶?問清淨是戒耶?教威儀是戒耶?三說羯磨是戒耶?和尚是戒耶?阿闍梨是戒耶?鬀髮是戒耶?著袈裟衣是戒耶?乞食是戒耶?正命是戒耶?如是觀已,於身無所取,於修無所著,於法無所住;過去已滅,未來未至,現在空寂;無作業者,無受報者;此世不移動,彼世不改變。此中何法名為梵行?梵行從何處來?誰之所有?體為是誰?由誰而作?為是有,為是無?為是色,為非色?為是受,為非受?為是想,為非想?為是行,為非行?為是識,為非識?如是觀察,梵行法不可得故,三世法皆空寂故,意無取著故,心無障礙故,所行無二故,方便自在故,受無相法故,觀無相法故,知佛法平等故,具一切佛法故,如是名為清淨梵行。 〔T10 0089〕 「復應修習十種法。何者為十?所謂:處非處智、過現未來業報智、諸禪解脫三昧智、諸根勝劣智、種種解智、種種界智、一切至處道智、天眼無礙智、宿命無礙智、永斷習氣智。於如來十力,一一觀察;一一力中,有無量義,悉應諮問。聞已,應起大慈悲心,觀察眾生而不捨離;思惟諸法,無有休息;行無上業,不求果報;了知境界如幻如夢,如影如響,亦如變化。若諸菩薩能與如是觀行相應,於諸法中不生二解,一切佛法疾得現前,初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,知一切法即心自性,成就慧身,不由他悟。」
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
問:染衣出家的人,怎樣才得梵行清淨
那時,正念天子對法慧菩薩說:
「佛子!一切世界裡的諸位菩薩眾,都依著如來的教法,染了法衣、出了家。要怎樣才能得到梵行(清淨之行)的清淨,從菩薩的位次一直達到無上菩提之道呢?」
答·總標:以十法為所緣,作意觀察
法慧菩薩說:
「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩修梵行的時候,應當以十件事作為所緣(心所對的境),起作意(把心提起來、不落在懵懂裡)而觀察。這十件事就是:身、身業(身的動作)、語、語業(語的作為)、意、意業(意的作為)、佛、法、僧、戒。
「應當這樣觀察:是身就是梵行嗎?乃至是戒就是梵行嗎?
觀察門一 身:若身是梵行,梵行便成了不淨之物
「如果身就是梵行,那麼要知道,梵行就成了非善的、非法的、渾濁的、臭惡的、不淨的、可厭的、違逆的、雜染的、是一具死屍、是一堆蟲聚。
觀察門二 身業:若身業是梵行,梵行便成了舉止動作
「如果身業就是梵行,那麼梵行就成了行、住、坐、臥,向左向右回頭看,屈身伸身、低頭抬頭。
觀察門三 語:若語是梵行,梵行便成了發聲的機關
「如果語就是梵行,那麼梵行就成了聲音與氣息、嘴唇舌頭喉嚨口吻、吐氣納氣抑住放開、聲調的高低清濁。
觀察門四 語業:若語業是梵行,梵行便成了各式說話
「如果語業就是梵行,那麼梵行就成了起居時的問候招呼、簡略地說、詳廣地說、打比方說、直截地說、稱讚地說、毀責地說、安立名相地說(假借施設而說)、隨順世俗地說、明白顯了地說。
觀察門五 意:若意是梵行,梵行便成了心裡的種種活動
「如果意就是梵行,那麼梵行就應該是覺(粗略的尋求)、是觀(細密的伺察)、是分別、是種種分別、是憶念、是種種憶念、是思惟、是種種思惟、是幻術、是睡眠作夢。
觀察門六 意業:若意業是梵行,梵行便成了感受與情緒
「如果意業就是梵行,那麼要知道,梵行就成了思與想、寒與熱、飢與渴、苦與樂、憂與喜。
觀察門七 佛:若佛是梵行,究竟哪一項是佛
「如果佛就是梵行,那麼是色(物質之身)就是佛嗎?受就是佛嗎?想就是佛嗎?行就是佛嗎?識就是佛嗎?是相(大的形相)就是佛嗎?好(細的莊嚴)就是佛嗎?神通就是佛嗎?業行就是佛嗎?果報就是佛嗎?
觀察門八 法:若法是梵行,究竟哪一項是法
「如果法就是梵行,那麼是寂滅就是法嗎?涅槃就是法嗎?不生就是法嗎?不起就是法嗎?不可說就是法嗎?無分別就是法嗎?無所行就是法嗎?不合集(不由諸緣湊合而成)就是法嗎?
觀察門九 僧:若僧是梵行,究竟哪一項是僧
「如果僧就是梵行,那麼是預流向(趣向初果者)就是僧嗎?預流果就是僧嗎?一來向就是僧嗎?一來果就是僧嗎?不還向就是僧嗎?不還果就是僧嗎?阿羅漢向就是僧嗎?阿羅漢果就是僧嗎?三明就是僧嗎?六通就是僧嗎?
觀察門十 戒:若戒是梵行,究竟哪一項是戒
「如果戒就是梵行,那麼是壇場(受戒的場地)就是戒嗎?問清淨(受戒前問遮難)就是戒嗎?教威儀(教授師教導威儀)就是戒嗎?三說羯磨(三度宣告的受戒法)就是戒嗎?和尚就是戒嗎?阿闍梨(軌範師)就是戒嗎?剃髮就是戒嗎?穿著袈裟衣就是戒嗎?乞食就是戒嗎?正命(以正當方式活命)就是戒嗎?
結觀(一):於身、於修、於法,三處都無所取著
「這樣觀察過了以後,對身沒有什麼可取,對所修沒有什麼可著,對法沒有什麼可住;過去的已經滅去,未來的還沒到來,現在的當體空寂;沒有一個造業的人,也沒有一個受報的人;這一世不曾移動過去,那一世也不曾改變過來。
結觀(二):那麼究竟什麼叫作梵行
「這裡面,哪一個法叫作梵行呢?梵行是從什麼地方來的呢?是誰所擁有的呢?它的體究竟是誰呢?是由誰造作出來的呢?它是有,還是無?是色,還是非色?是受,還是非受?是想,還是非想?是行,還是非行?是識,還是非識?
結觀(三):正因為不可得,才叫作清淨梵行
「這樣觀察下來:因為梵行這個法本不可得的緣故,因為三世諸法都空寂的緣故,因為意沒有取著的緣故,因為心沒有障礙的緣故,因為所行沒有二相的緣故,因為方便自在的緣故,因為領受無相之法的緣故,因為觀照無相之法的緣故,因為了知佛法平等的緣故,因為具足一切佛法的緣故——這樣才叫作清淨梵行。
復修十種法:如來十力的十種智
「還應當修習十種法。哪十種呢?就是:處非處智(知道理上可能與不可能的智慧)、過去現在未來業報智、諸禪解脫三昧智、諸根勝劣智(知眾生根器利鈍)、種種解智(知眾生種種理解與欲樂)、種種界智(知眾生種種性類)、一切至處道智(知一切道路通向何處)、天眼無礙智、宿命無礙智、永斷習氣智。
於如來十力,一一觀察,一一諮問
「對於如來的這十種力,要一一去觀察;每一種力當中,都含有無量的義理,全都應該去請教諮問。
起大慈悲·了境如幻
「聽聞之後,應當發起大慈悲心,觀察眾生而不捨離他們;思惟諸法,沒有止息;行最上的事業,卻不求果報;了知一切境界如同幻化、如同夢境,如同影子、如同回響,也如同變化出來的東西。
答果:初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提
「如果諸位菩薩能夠與這樣的觀行相應,在諸法之中不生起兩種對立的見解,那麼一切佛法很快就會現前,在最初發心的時候就得到了阿耨多羅三藐三菩提(無上正等正覺),了知一切法就是自心的本性,成就了智慧之身,不是從別人那裡才開悟的。」
Question: How is one who has dyed the robe and gone forth to attain purity of brahmacarya?
At that time the deva-son Right Mindfulness said to the bodhisattva Dharma Wisdom:
“Son of the Buddha! The hosts of bodhisattvas in all the worlds have, in accord with the Tathāgata’s teaching, dyed the Dharma robe and gone forth from the household. How are they to attain the purity of brahmacarya (the pure practice), and from the stations of a bodhisattva reach all the way to the path of unsurpassed awakening?”
The Answer, in General: Take ten dharmas as objects, rouse the attention and examine
The bodhisattva Dharma Wisdom said:
“Son of the Buddha! When a bodhisattva-mahāsattva cultivates brahmacarya, he should take ten things as his objects (the states that the mind faces), rouse the attention (lift the mind up, and not let it sink into a daze), and examine. These ten things are: the body; bodily action (what the body does); speech; verbal action (what speech does); thought; mental action (what thought does); the Buddha; the Dharma; the Saṅgha; the precepts.
“He should examine in this way: is the body brahmacarya? And so on down to: are the precepts brahmacarya?
Gate of Examination One, the Body: if the body were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become an impure thing
“If the body were brahmacarya, then know that brahmacarya would be non-good, contrary to the Dharma, turbid, foul and stinking, impure, loathsome, repugnant, defiled; would be a corpse; would be a swarm of worms.
Gate of Examination Two, bodily action: if bodily action were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become gestures and movements
“If bodily action were brahmacarya, then brahmacarya would be walking, standing, sitting, and lying down; turning the head to look left and to look right; bending and stretching, lowering the head and raising it.
Gate of Examination Three, speech: if speech were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become the apparatus that makes sound
“If speech were brahmacarya, then brahmacarya would be sound and breath; lips, tongue, throat, and mouth; breathing out and breathing in, holding back and letting go; the high and the low, the clear and the muddy, of the voice.
Gate of Examination Four, verbal action: if verbal action were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become the various ways of speaking
“If verbal action were brahmacarya, then brahmacarya would be greeting and saluting as one goes about the day; speaking briefly; speaking at length; speaking by way of comparison; speaking directly; speaking in praise; speaking in blame; speaking by positing names and characteristics (speaking by provisional designation); speaking in accord with the world’s conventions; speaking so as to make things plain and manifest.
Gate of Examination Five, thought: if thought were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become the various activities inside the mind
“If thought were brahmacarya, then brahmacarya would have to be initial thought (coarse seeking), sustained thought (fine investigation), discrimination, the various discriminations, recollection, the various recollections, deliberation, the various deliberations, conjuring tricks, and sleeping and dreaming.
Gate of Examination Six, mental action: if mental action were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become feelings and moods
“If mental action were brahmacarya, then know that brahmacarya would be volition and conception, cold and heat, hunger and thirst, pain and pleasure, sorrow and gladness.
Gate of Examination Seven, the Buddha: if the Buddha were brahmacarya, which item after all is the Buddha?
“If the Buddha were brahmacarya, then is form (the material body) the Buddha? Is feeling the Buddha? Is perception the Buddha? Are formations the Buddha? Is consciousness the Buddha? Are the marks (the major features of shape) the Buddha? Are the signs (the fine adornments) the Buddha? Are the supernormal powers the Buddha? Are karmic deeds the Buddha? Is the ripened recompense the Buddha?
Gate of Examination Eight, the Dharma: if the Dharma were brahmacarya, which item after all is the Dharma?
“If the Dharma were brahmacarya, then is quiescent cessation the Dharma? Is nirvāṇa the Dharma? Is the unborn the Dharma? Is the unarisen the Dharma? Is the inexpressible the Dharma? Is the undiscriminated the Dharma? Is the actionless the Dharma? Is the uncombined (that which is not put together by the concurrence of conditions) the Dharma?
Gate of Examination Nine, the Saṅgha: if the Saṅgha were brahmacarya, which item after all is the Saṅgha?
“If the Saṅgha were brahmacarya, then is the approach to stream-entry (one who is heading toward the first fruit) the Saṅgha? Is the fruit of stream-entry the Saṅgha? Is the approach to once-returning the Saṅgha? Is the fruit of once-returning the Saṅgha? Is the approach to non-returning the Saṅgha? Is the fruit of non-returning the Saṅgha? Is the approach to arhatship the Saṅgha? Is the fruit of arhatship the Saṅgha? Are the three clear knowledges the Saṅgha? Are the six superknowledges the Saṅgha?
Gate of Examination Ten, the precepts: if the precepts were brahmacarya, which item after all is the precepts?
“If the precepts were brahmacarya, then is the ordination platform (the site where the precepts are received) the precepts? Is the questioning as to purity (the questioning about impediments before the precepts are received) the precepts? Is the instruction in deportment (the instructing master’s teaching of deportment) the precepts? Is the threefold declaration of the karman (the procedure of receiving the precepts that is proclaimed three times) the precepts? Is the preceptor the precepts? Is the ācārya (the master of standards) the precepts? Is the shaving of the head the precepts? Is the wearing of the kāṣāya robe the precepts? Is begging for food the precepts? Is right livelihood (making one’s living in a proper way) the precepts?
Concluding Contemplation (1): in the body, in what is cultivated, in the dharmas — in all three there is nothing grasped or clung to
“Having examined in this way, there is nothing to be taken in the body, nothing to be clung to in what is cultivated, nothing to be dwelt in among the dharmas; the past has already ceased, the future has not yet come, the present is in its very substance empty and still; there is no one who does the deeds, and no one who receives the recompense; this world has not moved over to that one, and that world has not altered itself into this one.
Concluding Contemplation (2): then what after all is called brahmacarya?
“Among these, which dharma is called brahmacarya? From what place does brahmacarya come? Whose possession is it? What after all is its substance? By whom is it made? Is it existent, or is it nonexistent? Is it form, or is it not form? Is it feeling, or is it not feeling? Is it perception, or is it not perception? Is it formations, or is it not formations? Is it consciousness, or is it not consciousness?
Concluding Contemplation (3): precisely because it cannot be obtained, it is called pure brahmacarya
“Examining in this way: because the dharma that is brahmacarya is from the first unobtainable; because the dharmas of the three times are all empty and still; because thought has no grasping; because the mind has no obstruction; because what is practiced has no duality; because there is mastery in skillful means; because one receives the markless dharma; because one contemplates the markless dharma; because one knows that the Buddha’s dharmas are equal; because one is fully endowed with all the Buddha’s dharmas — this is what is called pure brahmacarya.
Further cultivating ten dharmas: the ten knowledges that are the Tathāgata’s ten powers
“He should further cultivate ten dharmas. Which ten? They are: the knowledge of what is possible and what is impossible (the wisdom that knows what can and what cannot be, in principle); the knowledge of the recompense of deeds past, present, and future; the knowledge of the meditations, the liberations, and the samādhis; the knowledge of superior and inferior faculties (knowing whether beings’ faculties are keen or dull); the knowledge of the various understandings (knowing beings’ various understandings and inclinations); the knowledge of the various realms (knowing beings’ various natures and kinds); the knowledge of the paths that lead to every destination (knowing where each road leads); the knowledge of the unobstructed divine eye; the knowledge of the unobstructed recollection of former lives; the knowledge that severs the habit-energies forever.
Concerning the Tathāgata’s ten powers, examine each one, inquire about each one
“Concerning these ten powers of the Tathāgata, one is to examine them one by one; within each single power there are measureless meanings, and about them all one should go and inquire.
Rousing great kindness and compassion; knowing objects to be like an illusion
“Having heard, one should give rise to the mind of great kindness and compassion, examining living beings and not abandoning them; deliberating upon the dharmas without ever resting; performing the highest works, yet seeking no recompense; knowing that all objects are like an illusion, like a dream, like a shadow, like an echo, and also like something conjured up.
The answer as to the fruit: at the time of the first arousing of the mind one attains unsurpassed perfect awakening
“If bodhisattvas are able to accord with contemplative practice such as this, and give rise to no two opposed views among the dharmas, then all the Buddha’s dharmas will swiftly come present; at the very time of the first arousing of the mind they attain unsurpassed perfect awakening (the unsurpassed, right, and universal enlightenment); they know that all dharmas are the very nature of their own mind; they perfect the body of wisdom, and it is not from another that they awaken.”
一個出家人問的問題
這一品從一句話開始。正念天子問法慧菩薩:一切世界的菩薩眾「依如來教,染衣出家」,那麼「云何而得梵行清淨,從菩薩位逮於無上菩提之道」。
先問一句:既然已經依教出家、已經染了衣,梵行不是現成的嗎,為什麼還要問「云何而得」?問題正落在這裡。染衣出家是一件已完成的事相,梵行清淨卻不是隨那件事相自動到手的。澄觀判本品來意的第三義說得明白,前面十住品是「前通道俗」,這一品才「今別顯出家所行」——出家的身分只是這一品的起點,不是它的答案。
排一個誤解:這不是說出家無用。經文自己把出家擺在問句的前半段作為前提,問的是前提之上還缺什麼。落到自己身上:任何一種已經取得的身分——受過戒、閉過關、讀過多少經——都只是問題的起點;若把身分當成已經抵達,這一品的第一句就把人攔住了。
十件事,就是全部的考場
法慧的回答不從定義入手,先給一張清單:「菩薩摩訶薩修梵行時,應以十法而為所緣,作意觀察」,十件事是身、身業、語、語業、意、意業、佛、法、僧、戒。
為什麼恰好是這十件?澄觀給了兩個理由:「一為成圓數;二梵行緣體不離此十」——身語意三者是行所依的處所,三業是行的因,佛法僧三寶是行的緣,戒則是行的體。換句話說,一個人所謂的梵行,能安放的地方就只有這十處,別無第十一處。
再問:既然三業已經歸向三寶、既已受戒隨戒,何必再觀?澄觀替讀者問了這一句,也自己答了:若不觀察,就會「取相堅持」,把戒相牢牢抓在手裡當作實有;一旦「見戒從緣,起心持戒」而不知其無性,那就是迷倒。所以這十觀不是懷疑戒行,是不許把戒行凝固成一個可執取的東西。
還有兩個字要看清:「作意觀察」。澄觀分訓:「作意者,不墮無記故。觀察者,以慧推求故。」作意是把心提起來,不許糊裡糊塗;觀察是用智慧去推求,不是坐著發呆。落地處:這一品講的觀,是清醒的、帶著問句的觀,不是放空。
前六門與後四門,破法並不相同
在逐門讀之前,先取一把尺。澄觀判:「十法即為十段。前六通染,是故但約染淨相違,名非梵行,亦不析破彼法自體。後四唯淨,順於梵行故,分析體空何有梵行。」
這句話決定了全品的讀法。前六門——身、身業、語、語業、意、意業——澄觀總判為「通染」:其中或屬無記(如身業門之四威儀、如語門之十事),或通於善惡,總之無一門定是清淨,所以經文只要指出它們與梵行的性質相違,就足以說『它不是梵行』,並不需要去拆解它們的自體。後四門——佛、法、僧、戒——這四樣本來就是清淨的、順於梵行的,說它們『性質相違』講不通,所以經文改用另一種手法:逐項推徵,析出它們也無自性,於是梵行仍然無處可安。
排一個誤讀:後四門的推徵不是在貶低三寶與戒。它是在說,連最清淨的四樣裡也找不到一個叫作梵行的實體——這是把梵行從一切依附處鬆開,不是把三寶推翻。
觀察門一 身:若身是梵行,梵行就成了一具屍
第一門,經文說如果身就是梵行,那梵行便「則為非善、則為非法、則為渾濁、則為臭惡、則為不淨、則為可厭、則為違逆、則為雜染、則為死屍、則為蟲聚」,一連十過。
先問:這十句是在罵身體嗎?不是。澄觀的釋法是兩兩相對地看:梵行的性格是「體是可軌,性能澄淨芬馨清潔,賢聖所欣」,而身的性格是「身通不善,體非順理」,是無記而不可作軌則、是飲食資成、是自相臭惡、是自性不淨。兩種性格既然相反,就不可能是同一物。他還逐一釋末二過:第九是「是身無知,又要當死,究竟不淨故」,第十則是「八萬戶蟲,戶有九億,全以蟲聚成其身故」。
要緊的是澄觀補的一句體例:「當知梵行之言貫通諸句」——每一句省略的主語都是梵行,不是身。也就是說,經文說的是『若把身當作梵行,梵行就變成這樣』,而不是『身就是這樣』。落地處:這是一場歸謬,不是一場厭身的修辭。
觀察門二 身業:若身業是梵行,梵行就成了姿勢
第二門,經文說梵行「則是行住坐臥、左右顧視、屈伸俯仰」。
這一門最貼近日常誤解。一個人容易把梵行認成一套威儀——走得端正、坐得穩、目不斜視。經文不否認威儀,只指出:如果威儀就是梵行本身,那麼一切行住坐臥都自動成了梵行,連漫不經心的走動也算。澄觀簡得極省:「十中,四儀無記,餘六通善惡,故非梵行。」四威儀是無記性的,其餘六項通於善惡,兩種都不能等同於必定是善的梵行。
排誤:這不是說威儀可廢。前一門既說身不是梵行,這一門說身的動作也不是;兩門合起來是在把梵行從『身體與姿態』整個區域裡請出去。落地處:坐姿再標準,不能代替心的清淨。
觀察門三 語:若語是梵行,梵行就成了發聲的機關
第三門說梵行「則是音聲風息、唇舌喉吻、吐納抑縱、高低清濁」。
澄觀把這十項拆成三層:「三語具十事,初一語體;次五語緣,謂風觸七處而出於聲」,後面吐納抑縱、高低清濁四項則是「辨語相」。語體、發語的條件、語的相狀——三層都在說話這件事的物理面。他的判語很直:「十事望業皆是語體,此唯無記,故非梵行。」
先問後答:那念經誦咒的聲音也不是梵行嗎?就聲音本身而言,是。聲帶的振動不分善惡,念佛的聲與罵人的聲在物理上同屬一類。落地處:聲音是載體,梵行不在載體上。這一門把梵行從『音聲之美』裡請出去。
觀察門四 語業:若語業是梵行,梵行就成了各式說話
第四門列十種說:起居問訊、略說、廣說、諭說、直說、讚說、毀說、安立說、隨俗說、顯了說。
第三門說的是發聲,這一門說的是說話的作為。澄觀判:「四語業十事通善惡故,亦非梵行。」並釋其中二目:「安立說者,謂假施設。隨俗說者,隨世名言。」安立說是假借名相施設而說,隨俗說是隨順世間的名言。
最值得注意的是十目裡並列著「讚說」與「毀說」。稱讚與毀責同在一張清單上,正說明語業本身是中性的容器——同一種說話的能力,可以成就法施,也可以成就惡口。落地處:講法講得好聽,不等於梵行;口才是語業的品質,不是梵行的品質。
觀察門五 意:若意是梵行,梵行就成了心裡的種種活動
第五門進入心。經文說梵行「則應是覺、是觀、是分別、是種種分別、是憶念、是種種憶念、是思惟、是種種思惟、是幻術、是眠夢」。
澄觀逐項訓釋,先分覺觀:「覺是尋求、觀是伺察,覺麁觀細是不定法。」覺是粗的尋求,觀是細的伺察,二者是不定法——可善可惡。分別是以慧揀擇,憶念「追憶曾習,唯緣過去」,思惟則「以慧籌度通去來今」。連幻術、睡眠與夢也列入,因為睡眠時意識仍在活動,只是取境昧略。他最後給出這一門的歸結:「此十是心所,不離心故,同名意也。」十項都是心所法,不離於心,所以統名為意。
排一個要緊的誤解:這裡連「分別」「思惟」都被列為非梵行,並不是要人變成木頭。經文列的是心的活動樣態,說的是這些樣態不能等同於梵行——它們可以承載梵行,也可以承載煩惱。落地處:頭腦清明、記性好、思路快,都不是梵行的證據。
觀察門六 意業:若意業是梵行,梵行就成了感受與情緒
第六門說梵行「則是思想、寒熱、飢渴、苦樂、憂喜」。
澄觀點出這一門的配法:「第六觀意業十事,皆意之用,故名為業。約遍行五徵之。一思、二想、次四是觸、後四是受。」十項配著遍行心所來徵——思、想各一,寒熱飢渴屬觸,苦樂憂喜屬受。他並自設一問:這裡的思、想與前一門的意有什麼分別?答:心所有二義,一是扶持心王,屬前一門所收;二是依心起用,屬這一門所收,所以這一門多從領受境界的一面來辨。
前六門到此收束。澄觀給出總判:既然遍行心所通於善惡無記三性,所以不是梵行。落地處:修行中最容易被誤認為成果的,正是感受——輕安、法喜、清涼。經文把苦樂憂喜整批列入非梵行,等於預先切斷了『以覺受驗道』這條路。
觀察門七 佛:哪一項是佛
從第七門起換手法。經文不再說『梵行則是甚麼』,改為逐項追問:「為色是佛耶?受是佛耶?」乃至相、好、神通、業行、果報,十項一一徵問。
澄觀說這一門是「觀佛十事觀於三身」,並列出兩種配法:若依小乘,前五是法身、次二是報身、次一是化身;若依大乘,「前八皆是化身,後一報身」。配法雖異,破的方式只有一個:「今一一推徵,若一是佛,餘者應非。一一皆佛則有多佛,和合成佛則無自性。」若某一項是佛,其餘九項就都不是;若每一項都是佛,就有十尊佛;若說要十項合起來才是佛,那合起來的東西就沒有自性。他引龍樹之偈作證:「非陰不離陰,此彼不相在。如來不有陰,何處有如來。」
結論澄觀說得極清楚:「是知真佛既超心境,依斯成行,行豈相耶?」真佛既然超出心與境的範圍,依此而成的行,也就不會落在相上。落地處:把佛認作一個可指認的形相,梵行也就跟著落成了形相。
觀察門八 法:哪一項是法
第八門追問寂滅、涅槃、不生、不起、不可說、無分別、無所行、不合集——只有八項。
這裡有一個古德注意到的異樣:其餘九門都是十項,唯獨這一門是八。澄觀出了兩解而不定一:一解疑心梵本有脫漏,「豈餘九皆十,此獨八耶」;另一解說八自有所表,「表除九十八使故,加十總觀破百八煩惱故」。兩解並列,讀者知其有此二說即可。
破法與佛門同式:若其中一項是法,其餘應非;若總合起來是法,則和合而成便不真實。澄觀更點出這一門選目的用意:「又此舉法皆舉寂滅不生等者,欲明一一自虛,法即非法,梵行何從?」所舉的八項全是寂滅、不生一類最高的名目,正因為連這些名目自身都是空虛的,所以才顯得出梵行無處可寄。
落地處:這一門攔的是最隱蔽的一種執取——把『空』『涅槃』『無分別』當成一個可以站上去的地方。
觀察門九 僧:哪一項是僧
第九門追問四向四果與三明六通共十項。澄觀分為兩截:「第九觀僧十事,前八約人後、二就德,且依小說。」前八是就人說,後二是就德說,並且暫依小乘的分位而說。
他順帶把四向四果的斷惑分齊逐一交代——預流是初超凡地、預入聖流,一來是欲界修惑未盡而一度來生,不還是欲界惑盡不再還來,阿羅漢則含殺賊、不生、應供三義;四向則是趣向於果者。交代完他自己止住:「今此欲明梵行,粗陳名目」,若要廣引諸論,反而累於名數。
破法緊扣「僧」字之義:「僧名和合,而有八輩。一若是僧,餘則應非。」僧的意思正是和合眾,而這裡卻列出八輩之別;若一一分別去辨,各自就沒有『眾』的意思了,把這些沒有眾義的個體聚在一起,又如何成眾?至於後二項的德,德若就是僧,何必還要八輩?離法無人、離人無法,一一窮究到底,「為僧者誰?僧體既虛,梵行安寄?」
觀察門十 戒:哪一項是戒
第十門是全篇最貼身的一門,因為問的正是這一品的前提——受戒出家這件事本身。經文追問壇場、問清淨、教威儀、三說羯磨、和尚、阿闍梨、剃髮、著袈裟衣、乞食、正命,十項全是受戒與持戒的具體環節。
澄觀分之為二:「其中十事,前八是受、後二是隨。」前八是受戒之事——壇場是得戒之處,問淨與教儀是教授師之事,三說羯磨是得戒之法,和尚是得戒根本,阿闍梨即二師而義兼七證,剃髮著衣是戒的外相;後二是隨戒之事——乞食是四依之一,正命是離四邪五邪。
他釋這一門的關鍵在一句:「戒為行體,亦賴眾緣,從緣成戒,戒性如空。起心持者,是謂迷倒。」戒雖是梵行的體,卻仍是眾緣所成,緣成之戒其性如空;若起一個『我在持戒』的心去抓住它,那就迷倒了。真正的持是「無善無威儀,不雜二乘心,是名持淨戒,此戒乃名真梵行也。」
還有一句要記住:所觀的境雖然通於大小乘,能觀的智不通。澄觀判「所觀境通於大小,其能觀智唯實教大乘」——同樣一場受戒,聲聞也能觀,但這一品要的是實教大乘的觀智。落地處:這一門不是叫人不受戒,是叫受了戒的人不把受戒當作終點。
結觀(一):三處無取,三世不遷
十門推徵完畢,經文轉入觀成之相:「於身無所取,於修無所著,於法無所住;過去已滅,未來未至,現在空寂;無作業者,無受報者;此世不移動,彼世不改變。」
澄觀分這十句為四層。初層明三輪清淨觀——「初六句明三輪清淨觀:一不取能持戒眾生,言身兼口意也;二不著所修行事;三不住於戒法」——所舉唯不取能持戒的眾生、不著所修的行事、不住於戒法三事,而疏文標作「六句」;四層之數(六、三、二、二)合計亦逾十,古德文本自有此不齊,此處誌其異,不強為之判。次三句以三世門說明不住持戒之時,其中前二句易明,難在「現在空寂」:現在既然剎那不住,被過去未來分割,所以也空寂。再次二句明二空——造業的人是我空,所受的業報是法空。
最後二句最耐讀。澄觀釋:「此世不移動,謂不從今至後;彼世不改變,謂不從後至今。」因既已在過去滅去,沒有力量伸到未來去感果;果既不與因同時,也沒有力量回頭去酬因。歸結是一句:「以物各性住,性本空故。」落地處:這不是否認因果,是說因果不靠一個實體在時間裡搬運。
結觀(二):那麼梵行究竟是什麼
接著經文連下十一問:「此中何法名為梵行?梵行從何處來?誰之所有?體為是誰?由誰而作?」而後以五陰追問:是有是無、是色非色、是受非受、是想非想、是行非行、是識非識。
澄觀分之:首句總顯梵行無名,因為十法已空;以下分別破——不從十法生、不屬身等所有,這二句是就緣來徵;離十法之外別無戒體、也沒有一個能作者,這二句是就體來徵;雙非之句則是顯中道。
最後五句配五陰,他說有兩重用意。一是就戒體說:古來有說無作戒體即是色,有說非色非心;經文問「為是色」是要顯非色,問「為非色」是要顯非非色。若說戒是心,那麼一切有心者都該常有梵行;若說非心,木石也該有梵行。二是就修梵行不離五蘊說:若梵行即是蘊,那有蘊的都是梵行;若離蘊,又哪裡是我的梵行?所以結歸都不可得。
落地處:這一段是把『梵行』這個名詞本身也送進推徵,一直問到連問的對象都站不住。
結觀(三):不可得,才是清淨
推到山窮水盡,經文給出結論——並且結論不是虛無,是清淨。經文說梵行之所以清淨,是因為「梵行法不可得故,三世法皆空寂故,意無取著故,心無障礙故,所行無二故,方便自在故,受無相法故,觀無相法故,知佛法平等故,具一切佛法故」,十個「故」字之後,「如是名為清淨梵行」。
這是全品最要緊的轉折。前面十門一路否定,讀者若停在否定上,會以為結論是『沒有梵行』。經文的結論恰恰相反:正因為不可得,才叫清淨。澄觀釋這十一句說首句為總、次九句別顯無得之由,並逐句配:三世皆空、於身無取於修無著、心無障礙即前於法無住、作受二念不現行、雖空不礙涉有、涉有不迷於空故有受與觀無相二句,第八句結歸平等,他引般若之語「我不見有一法非佛法者」為證,第九句「一收一切方顯具德圓融」,末句總結——由上諸義故名淨梵行。
排誤:不可得不是沒有,是不能被抓住。落地處:一個人若還能指著某樣東西說『這就是我的梵行』,那樣東西就正是未清淨處。
復修十種法:自利之後轉向利他
到此自行清淨一段結束。經文說「復應修習十種法」,列出處非處智、過現未來業報智、諸禪解脫三昧智、諸根勝劣智、種種解智、種種界智、一切至處道智、天眼無礙智、宿命無礙智、永斷習氣智。
先問:前面剛說一切不可得,怎麼又要修十種智?澄觀正是在這裡判轉——前段是自行清淨,這裡起「明利他行淨」,而這十智是「初深觀果智,即利他之方」。他有一句話把兩段接得極好:「緣體宛然、一心湛寂,梵行用也。不思不造萬行沸騰,故不但心觀圓明,復應廣集佛智。」心觀圓明只是一半,還須廣集佛智,才能為人。
排一個常見的偏差:以為證了空就不必再學。經文的次第正相反——空觀成就之後,緊接著是一張十項的學習清單。落地處:不可得是自處之地,十智是待人之具,兩者不衝突。
於如來十力,一一觀察,一一諮問
經文接著說:「於如來十力,一一觀察;一一力中,有無量義,悉應諮問。」
這一句只有短短二十一字,卻是這一品裡唯一一處直接說到『向人請教』的。前面十門觀察全是自己推徵,這裡卻要求觀察之外還要諮問——因為每一力之中都有無量義,不是獨自坐想能窮盡的。澄觀判此段為「結勸廣學」。
排誤:這不與前面的「不由他悟」矛盾。諮問是求解,悟則不假外求;一個是學的門,一個是證的門。落地處:不肯問人而自以為悟,與問遍天下而不自證,是兩種病,這一品兩處各治一種。
起大慈悲·了境如幻
聽聞之後做什麼?經文給了四件事:「應起大慈悲心,觀察眾生而不捨離;思惟諸法,無有休息;行無上業,不求果報;了知境界如幻如夢,如影如響,亦如變化。」
澄觀把這四句配成四無量心的成就:「一雙起慈悲,如犢母隨子;二思惟藥病,成大法喜;三即行無求,以成大捨;四智了諸境,導成無緣。」慈悲之不捨眾生像母牛跟著小牛;思惟法藥與眾生之病,成就的是大喜;行事而不求果報,成就的是大捨;智慧了達諸境如幻,則使前三者都成為無緣的——不繫在特定對象上。
末後五喻,澄觀逐一釋:如幻是似有而不實,「似有故假、不實故空,此二不二,成中道智」;如夢是虛妄所見,如影是從業緣現,如響是屬諸因緣,如變化是須臾變滅。歸結是「若如是了境,即終日化而無化」。落地處:這五喻不是叫人視眾生為虛假而不救,恰恰是使救度不落在能所之相上——這才是無緣之慈。
眼句:初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提
全品最後一段,回答正念天子問的後半——從菩薩位如何逮於無上菩提。經文說:「若諸菩薩能與如是觀行相應,於諸法中不生二解,一切佛法疾得現前,初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」
這一句是華嚴最著名、也最容易被讀成大話的一句。先把疑問擺正:初發心明明是修行的起點,怎麼會當下就是無上菩提?澄觀的釋法分兩步。第一步先回答「疾在何時」:「上言疾得,疾在何時?故云初發心時。何法現前?謂無上菩提也。」第二步才回答為什麼可以如此——這個所以然在下一句經文裡,即「知一切法即心自性故,覺法自性即名為佛」。他還引本經他處作證:「佛心豈有他,正覺覺世間。」
最要緊的是澄觀對「發」字的定訓:「斯則發者,是開發之發,非發起之發也。」發不是新起一個從無到有的念頭,是把本來具有的開顯出來。這一字之訓,決定了整句不是誇張而是實說——開顯的當下,所開顯者本自圓滿,所以說即得。
法藏釋六十本同一句時,走的是位次相即的路:「此明行滿入位時,即得普賢位故,一位即一切位,乃至佛果無不圓備」,並歸結為「此一乘普賢行位,因果圓融相即無礙故致然也」。李通玄則從情盡智現說:「是知見亡智應,名初發心時便成正覺」三家路徑不同,所遮的誤解卻一致——都不是說『才發心就不必修了』。
排誤要說得更直一點:經文給了這一句一個前提句——「若諸菩薩能與如是觀行相應,於諸法中不生二解」。能與前面那整套十門推徵的觀行相應,才有這一句;離開那個前提去引用這一句,是把結論從條件上剝下來。落地處:初心之所以能成正覺,不是因為初心便宜,是因為那個初心裡已經沒有二解。
結句:知一切法即心自性,不由他悟
經文以三句收尾:「知一切法即心自性,成就慧身,不由他悟。」
第一句是前一句的所以然。澄觀釋:「既言知一切法即心自性,則知此心即一切法性。今理現自心,即心之性已備無邊之德矣。」一切法即是自心之性,反過來說自心即是一切法之性;理既現於自心,此心之性本已具足無邊功德——所以初心與正覺之間並沒有一段距離要跨。
第二句「成就慧身」,澄觀以鏡喻釋之:「覺心則理現,理現則智圓。若鏡淨明生,非前非後、非新非故,寂照湛然。」鏡子擦淨了,明就生起,那個明不是新造的,也不是舊藏的,沒有先後可分。他又對照前後說:「上觀法盡也,正法當興;今諸見亡也,佛智爰起。」
第三句「不由他悟」,澄觀訓為「即無師自然智也」,並開三義:「又不由他悟是自覺也,知一切法是覺他也,成就慧身為覺滿也。」自覺、覺他、覺滿三義齊備。他還下了一個極徹底的轉語:既說心性,「見夫心性豈更有他?若見有他,安稱為悟?既曰心性,自亦不存。」——連『自』也不立,才是寂而能知的正覺。
落地處:這一品從『出家了還缺什麼』問起,答到最後是——缺的不是再添一樣東西,是把加在梵行上的每一層依附都取下來,取到連取者也不存,本有的智慧之身自然現前。
承衍
本品之義為後世三軌所承,並錄不判。澄觀一系:以來意、釋名、宗趣、釋文四門科釋,出梵行之體為戒、四等、慧三義而三義各分二層——戒分隨相、離相,四等分有緣、無緣,慧分有分別、無分別,判十法「前六通染」而後四唯淨,因之立兩種破法;於「發」字定為開發之發,於「不由他悟」開自覺覺他覺滿三義,並以《演義鈔》逐義補釋來意六門,揀明前段觀空「非斷滅故」。法藏一系:於六十本以三說釋名,立淨與梵之六別——約報、約人、約行位、約二利、約二行、約因果,其中「隨事造修施戒等為淨行,離念契玄為梵行」一別最切本品;果段判為兩重顯少因得大果,第二重以「初發心時是因、便成正覺是果」立標,歸結於一乘普賢行位之因果圓融相即。李通玄一系:以表法讀之,就能問之主釋「無念之念名為正念」,就能說之人釋「達理情亡名為法慧」;又於本論中屢以〈淨行品〉之名稱本品,並分二位之淨行——十信位一百四十願之淨行成世間知見,十住位則「以行體無為,名為淨行」;末以諸淨遞轉作結,行淨故智慧淨、智慧淨故心淨,乃至法界淨、眾生淨、佛國土淨。三家所走之路不同,古有此諸說,誌錄之。
華嚴宗論之承者二處:智儼於其章目書中立「梵行品初明通觀章」一章,以本品十門為通觀之典據;新羅見登於成佛義之書中引本品五喻文「如響如化等故」以證一行即一切行。二處皆引本品為據而非疏釋本品全文,誌錄不判。
本品前承〈十住品〉、後接〈初發心功德品〉。澄觀判本品來意第五義為「顯入住之因」,第六義為「別顯初住成佛」,正說明這一品夾在位次與功德之間的位置:前品說住位之相,本品說住位之行,下品則專明初發心之功德——本品末句所立的「初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」,下一品即以整品的篇幅為之校量。本品之五喻,澄觀又指其廣說在〈十忍品〉;本品之名,則與第二會〈淨行品〉相對而立。一品九百餘字,前後左右皆有繫屬,讀時不宜孤取。
The question asked by one who has already gone forth
This chapter begins from a single sentence. The deva-son Right Mindfulness asks the bodhisattva Dharma Wisdom: the hosts of bodhisattvas of all the worlds have “in accord with the Tathāgata’s teaching, dyed the robe and gone forth from the household” — then “how are they to attain purity of brahmacarya, and from the stations of a bodhisattva reach the path of unsurpassed awakening?”
Ask first: since they have already gone forth in accord with the teaching, since the robe has already been dyed, is brahmacarya not already in hand? Why is there still something to ask about with “how are they to attain”? The problem falls exactly here. Dyeing the robe and going forth is a matter of outward fact already completed, whereas purity of brahmacarya does not come into one’s hands automatically along with that fact. Chengguan says it plainly in the third of his senses for why this chapter comes: the preceding chapter, The Ten Abodes, “ran through both the way and the world,” whereas this chapter “now shows separately what those who have gone forth practice” — the status of one gone forth is only the starting point of this chapter, not its answer.
Clear away a misunderstanding: this is not to say that going forth is useless. The scripture itself places going forth in the first half of the question, as a premise, and asks what is still lacking on top of that premise. Brought home to oneself: any status already obtained — having taken the precepts, having sat a retreat, having read however many scriptures — is only where the question starts; and if one takes the status for an arrival, the very first sentence of this chapter stops one where one stands.
Ten things, and they are the whole examination hall
Dharma Wisdom’s answer does not begin from a definition; it begins by giving a list: “when a bodhisattva-mahāsattva cultivates brahmacarya, he should take ten dharmas as his objects, rouse the attention and examine,” and the ten things are body, bodily action, speech, verbal action, thought, mental action, the Buddha, the Dharma, the Saṅgha, and the precepts.
Why exactly these ten? Chengguan gives two reasons: “first, to make up a round number; second, because the conditions and the substance of brahmacarya are not apart from these ten” — body, speech, and thought are the places on which practice depends; the three kinds of action are the causes of practice; the three jewels — Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha — are the conditions of practice; and the precepts are the substance of practice. In other words, the places in which what a person calls his brahmacarya can be set down are just these ten, and there is no eleventh.
Ask again: since the three kinds of action have already been turned toward the three jewels, and since the precepts have already been received and are being followed, why is there any need to examine further? Chengguan asks this on the reader’s behalf, and answers it himself: if one does not examine, then one will “grasp at characteristics and hold to them firmly,” clutching the marks of the precepts in one’s hand as though they were real; and once one “sees the precepts as arising from conditions and rouses a mind that keeps them” without knowing that they are without nature, that is delusion turned upside down. So these ten contemplations are not a doubting of the practice of the precepts; they are a refusal to let the practice of the precepts congeal into something that can be grasped.
There are two more words to see clearly: “rouse the attention and examine.” Chengguan glosses them separately: “to rouse the attention is not to fall into the indeterminate; to examine is to search out by means of wisdom.” Rousing the attention is lifting the mind up and not allowing muddleheadedness; examining is searching out with wisdom, not sitting there blankly. Where it comes home: the contemplation this chapter speaks of is a wakeful contemplation that carries a question in it, not a going blank.
The first six gates and the latter four: the way of refutation is not the same
Before reading gate by gate, take up a measure. Chengguan judges: “the ten dharmas make ten sections. The first six run through defilement, and therefore the argument is made only with respect to the mutual contrariety of the defiled and the pure, so as to name them as not brahmacarya; their own substance is not analysed and broken down. The latter four are purely pure, and since they accord with brahmacarya, one analyses their substance as empty — where then would brahmacarya be?”
This sentence determines how the whole chapter is read. The first six gates — body, bodily action, speech, verbal action, thought, mental action — Chengguan judges together as “running through defilement”: among them some are indeterminate (the four postures in the gate of bodily action, for instance, or the ten items in the gate of speech), and some run through both good and bad; in short, not one of the gates is definitely pure, and so the scripture need only point out that they are contrary in nature to brahmacarya, and that suffices to say this is not brahmacarya, without any need to take apart their own substance. The latter four gates — the Buddha, the Dharma, the Saṅgha, the precepts — are pure to begin with and accord with brahmacarya, so that saying they are contrary in nature will not work; the scripture therefore changes to another method: it presses each item in turn and analyses out that they too are without self-nature, whereupon brahmacarya still has nowhere to be lodged.
Clear away a misreading: the pressing of the latter four gates is not a disparaging of the three jewels and the precepts. It says that even within the four purest things there is no substantial entity to be found that is called brahmacarya — this loosens brahmacarya from every place it might attach to; it does not overthrow the three jewels.
Gate of examination one, the body: if the body were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become a corpse
At the first gate the scripture says that if the body were brahmacarya, then brahmacarya “would be non-good, would be contrary to the Dharma, would be turbid, would be foul and stinking, would be impure, would be loathsome, would be repugnant, would be defiled, would be a corpse, would be a swarm of worms” — ten faults in a row.
Ask first: are these ten clauses an abuse of the body? They are not. Chengguan’s way of glossing is to look at them two by two in opposition: the character of brahmacarya is that “its substance can serve as a standard, and its nature is able to be clear and pure, fragrant and clean, such as the worthy and the noble delight in,” whereas the character of the body is that “the body runs through what is not good, and its substance does not accord with principle” — it is indeterminate and cannot serve as a standard, it is sustained by food and drink, its own characteristic is foul, and its own nature is impure. Since the two characters are opposed, they cannot be one and the same thing. He also glosses the last two faults one by one: the ninth is that “this body is without knowing, and moreover must die, and in the end is impure,” and the tenth that “there are eighty thousand households of worms, each household having nine koṭis, and it is wholly as a swarm of worms that they make up the body.”
What matters is a point of form that Chengguan adds: “know that the word brahmacarya runs through all the clauses” — the subject omitted in every clause is brahmacarya, not the body. That is to say, what the scripture states is if one takes the body for brahmacarya, then brahmacarya turns into this, and not the body is like this. Where it comes home: this is a reduction to absurdity, not a rhetoric of disgust with the body.
Gate of examination two, bodily action: if bodily action were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become posture
At the second gate the scripture says that brahmacarya “would be walking, standing, sitting, and lying down; looking left and looking right; bending and stretching, lowering and raising the head.”
This gate lies closest to an everyday misunderstanding. It is easy to take brahmacarya for a set of deportments — walking uprightly, sitting steadily, not letting the eyes wander. The scripture does not deny deportment; it only points out that if deportment were brahmacarya itself, then all walking, standing, sitting, and lying down would automatically be brahmacarya, careless strolling included. Chengguan is extremely spare here: “among the ten, the four postures are indeterminate, and the remaining six run through good and bad, and therefore they are not brahmacarya.” The four postures are of indeterminate nature, and the other six items run through both good and bad; neither kind can be equated with a brahmacarya that must be good.
Clear away an error: this is not to say that deportment may be abolished. The previous gate said that the body is not brahmacarya; this gate says that the body’s movements are not either; the two gates taken together are showing brahmacarya out of the whole territory of body and posture. Where it comes home: however correct the sitting posture, it cannot take the place of purity of mind.
Gate of examination three, speech: if speech were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become the apparatus that makes sound
The third gate says that brahmacarya “would be sound and breath, lips and tongue and throat and mouth, breathing out and in and holding back and letting go, high and low and clear and muddy.”
Chengguan takes these ten items apart into three layers: “the third, speech, has ten items: the first one is the substance of speech; the next five are the conditions of speech, that is, the wind touching seven places and issuing as sound,” while the last four — breathing out and in, holding back and letting go, high and low, clear and muddy — are “distinguishing the characteristics of speech.” The substance of speech, the conditions for producing speech, and the characteristics of speech — all three layers are speaking about the physical side of the business of talking. His verdict is blunt: “the ten items, regarded in relation to action, are all the substance of speech, and this is solely indeterminate, and therefore is not brahmacarya.”
Ask first, then answer: then is the sound of reciting scriptures and mantras also not brahmacarya? As far as the sound itself goes, it is not. The vibration of the vocal cords does not divide into good and bad; the sound of reciting the Buddha’s name and the sound of cursing a man belong physically to one and the same class. Where it comes home: sound is a carrier, and brahmacarya does not reside in the carrier. This gate shows brahmacarya out of the beauty of vocal sound.
Gate of examination four, verbal action: if verbal action were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become the various ways of speaking
The fourth gate lists ten kinds of speaking: greeting and saluting as one goes about the day, speaking briefly, speaking at length, speaking by comparison, speaking directly, speaking in praise, speaking in blame, speaking by positing names, speaking in accord with convention, speaking so as to make things manifest.
The third gate spoke of the producing of sound; this gate speaks of the doing that is speech. Chengguan judges: “the ten items of the fourth, verbal action, run through good and bad, and therefore are also not brahmacarya.” And he glosses two of the items: “speaking by positing names means speaking by provisional designation; speaking in accord with convention means following the world’s names and words.” Speaking by positing names is speaking by borrowing names and characteristics and setting them up; speaking in accord with convention is following along with the words and names of the world.
What most deserves notice is that “speaking in praise” and “speaking in blame” stand side by side within the ten items. That praise and blame are on one and the same list shows precisely that verbal action is in itself a neutral vessel — the very same capacity for speech can accomplish the giving of the Dharma and can accomplish harsh speech. Where it comes home: expounding the Dharma in a way that is pleasant to hear is not the same as brahmacarya; eloquence is a quality of verbal action, not a quality of brahmacarya.
Gate of examination five, thought: if thought were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become the various activities inside the mind
The fifth gate enters the mind. The scripture says that brahmacarya “would have to be initial thought, sustained thought, discrimination, the various discriminations, recollection, the various recollections, deliberation, the various deliberations, conjuring tricks, and sleeping and dreaming.”
Chengguan glosses item by item, first dividing initial thought from sustained thought: “initial thought is seeking, sustained thought is investigating; initial thought is coarse and sustained thought fine, and they are indeterminate dharmas.” Initial thought is coarse seeking, sustained thought is fine investigating, and the two are indeterminate dharmas — they may be good and may be bad. Discrimination is selecting by means of wisdom; recollection is “calling back to mind what has been practised before, and takes only the past as its object”; deliberation “measures by means of wisdom, and runs through past, future, and present.” Even conjuring tricks, sleep, and dreams are included, because during sleep the consciousness is still active, only that its grasp of objects is dim and abbreviated. At the end he gives the conclusion of this gate: “these ten are mental factors, and since they are not apart from the mind, they are alike named thought.” All ten items are mental factors, not apart from the mind, and therefore are named together as thought.
Clear away one important misunderstanding: that even “discrimination” and “deliberation” are here listed as not brahmacarya is not meant to turn a person into a block of wood. What the scripture lists are the modes of activity of the mind, and what it says is that these modes cannot be equated with brahmacarya — they can carry brahmacarya and they can carry the afflictions alike. Where it comes home: a clear head, a good memory, and quick thinking are none of them evidence of brahmacarya.
Gate of examination six, mental action: if mental action were brahmacarya, brahmacarya would become feelings and moods
The sixth gate says that brahmacarya “would be volition and conception, cold and heat, hunger and thirst, pain and pleasure, sorrow and gladness.”
Chengguan points out how this gate is matched up: “the sixth contemplates the ten items of mental action; all of them are the functioning of thought, and therefore are named action. They are pressed with respect to the five omnipresent factors: the first is volition, the second conception, the next four are contact, and the last four are feeling.” The ten items are pressed against the omnipresent mental factors — volition and conception one each, cold and heat and hunger and thirst belonging to contact, pain and pleasure and sorrow and gladness belonging to feeling. And he sets himself a question: what is the difference between volition and conception here and the thought of the previous gate? The answer: mental factors have two senses — first, they support the king of the mind, and that belongs to what the previous gate subsumes; second, they arise as functions in dependence on the mind, and that belongs to what this gate subsumes; and so this gate distinguishes them chiefly from the side of receiving objects.
Here the first six gates come to a close. Chengguan gives a general verdict: since the omnipresent mental factors run through all three natures — good, bad, and indeterminate — they are not brahmacarya. Where it comes home: what is most easily mistaken for an attainment in practice is precisely feeling — ease, joy in the Dharma, coolness. The scripture puts pain and pleasure and sorrow and gladness into the list of what is not brahmacarya, all in one batch, and this amounts to cutting off in advance the road of verifying the path by sensation.
Gate of examination seven, the Buddha: which item is the Buddha?
From the seventh gate the method changes. The scripture no longer says brahmacarya would then be such and such; it presses instead item by item: “is form the Buddha? Is feeling the Buddha?” and so on down to the marks, the signs, the supernormal powers, karmic deeds, and the ripened recompense — ten items pressed one by one.
Chengguan says that this gate is “contemplating the ten items of the Buddha as a contemplation of the three bodies,” and sets out two ways of matching them: if one follows the lesser vehicle, the first five are the dharma-body, the next two the reward body, and the next one the emanation body; if one follows the great vehicle, “the first eight are all the emanation body, and the last one is the reward body.” The matchings differ, but there is only one way of refuting: “now each is pressed one by one. If one is the Buddha, the rest ought not to be. If each and every one is the Buddha, then there are many Buddhas. If they combine together to make the Buddha, then there is no self-nature.” If some one item is the Buddha, the other nine are all not; if every item is the Buddha, there are ten Buddhas; and if it is said that the ten items must be put together to make the Buddha, then what is put together has no self-nature. He cites a verse of Nāgārjuna as attestation: “not the aggregates, not apart from the aggregates; this and that are not in one another. The Tathāgata does not possess the aggregates; where then is there a Tathāgata?”
Chengguan states the conclusion with utter clarity: “know then that since the true Buddha transcends mind and object, how could a practice accomplished on this basis be a matter of characteristics?” Since the true Buddha is beyond the range of mind and object, the practice accomplished on that basis will likewise not fall into characteristics. Where it comes home: take the Buddha for a form that can be pointed at, and brahmacarya falls into being a form along with him.
Gate of examination eight, the Dharma: which item is the Dharma?
The eighth gate presses quiescent cessation, nirvāṇa, the unborn, the unarisen, the inexpressible, the undiscriminated, the actionless, and the uncombined — only eight items.
Here is an oddity that the ancient worthies noticed: the other nine gates all have ten items, and this one alone has eight. Chengguan brings out two explanations and settles on neither: one explanation suspects that the Sanskrit text has dropped something, “how should the other nine all be ten and this one alone be eight?”; the other explanation says that the eight has something it symbolizes, “it symbolizes the removing of the ninety-eight proclivities, and adding the tenth as a general contemplation it breaks the one hundred and eight afflictions.” The two explanations stand side by side, and it is enough for the reader to know that these two exist.
The method of refutation is of the same form as at the gate of the Buddha: if one among them is the Dharma, the rest ought not to be; and if the sum of them is the Dharma, then what is made by combination is not real. Chengguan further points out the purpose behind the choice of items at this gate: “moreover, that the dharmas raised here are all such things as quiescent cessation and the unborn is meant to make clear that each of them is in itself empty; the Dharma is not the Dharma — whence then brahmacarya?” The eight items raised are all names of the highest sort, quiescent cessation and the unborn and their kind; and it is precisely because even these names are in themselves empty that it becomes evident that brahmacarya has nowhere to be lodged.
Where it comes home: what this gate blocks is the most hidden kind of grasping — taking emptiness, nirvāṇa, and non-discrimination for a place one can stand on.
Gate of examination nine, the Saṅgha: which item is the Saṅgha?
The ninth gate presses the four approaches and four fruits together with the three clear knowledges and six superknowledges, ten items in all. Chengguan divides them into two portions: “the ninth contemplates the ten items of the Saṅgha: the first eight with respect to persons, the latter two with respect to qualities, and provisionally following the lesser vehicle.” The first eight are stated with respect to persons, the latter two with respect to qualities, and for the time being it is stated following the divisions of the lesser vehicle.
He takes the occasion to set out one by one the measure of afflictions cut off at each of the four approaches and four fruits — the stream-enterer is the one who first passes beyond the stage of the ordinary and enters into the stream of the noble; the once-returner is one whose afflictions of cultivation in the desire realm are not yet exhausted and who is born once more; the non-returner is one whose afflictions of the desire realm are exhausted and who does not come back again; and the arhat contains three senses, slayer of foes, no more birth, and worthy of offerings; while the four approaches are those who are heading toward the fruits. Having set this out, he stops himself: “what is wanted here is to make brahmacarya clear, so the names are set out roughly” — for to cite the treatises at length would only burden it with names and numbers.
The refutation clings tightly to the sense of the word “Saṅgha”: “Saṅgha means a harmonious assembly, and yet there are eight classes. If one is the Saṅgha, the rest ought not to be.” The sense of Saṅgha is precisely an assembly gathered in harmony, and yet what is listed here is a difference of eight classes; and if one distinguishes them one by one, each in itself has no sense of assembly, and if these individuals that have no sense of assembly are gathered up together, how could they make an assembly? As for the qualities of the last two items, if quality were the Saṅgha, why would the eight classes still be needed? There are no persons apart from dharmas and no dharmas apart from persons; and when each is investigated to the end, “who then is the Saṅgha? Since the substance of the Saṅgha is already empty, where is brahmacarya to be lodged?”
Gate of examination ten, the precepts: which item is the precepts?
The tenth gate is the one that comes closest to the body in the whole piece, because what it asks about is precisely the premise of this chapter — the very fact of receiving the precepts and going forth. The scripture presses the ordination platform, the questioning as to purity, the instruction in deportment, the threefold declaration of the karman, the preceptor, the ācārya, the shaving of the head, the wearing of the kāṣāya robe, begging for food, and right livelihood; all ten items are concrete elements of receiving and keeping the precepts.
Chengguan divides them in two: “among them are ten items: the first eight are the receiving, the latter two the following.” The first eight are matters of receiving the precepts — the platform is the place where the precepts are obtained, the questioning as to purity and the instruction in deportment are the business of the instructing master, the threefold declaration of the karman is the method by which the precepts are obtained, the preceptor is the root of obtaining the precepts, the ācārya is the second master and in sense covers the seven witnesses as well, and shaving the head and wearing the robe are the outward marks of the precepts; the latter two are matters of following the precepts — begging for food is one of the four reliances, and right livelihood is the leaving behind of the four and the five wrong livelihoods.
His gloss on the crux of this gate lies in one sentence: “the precepts are the substance of practice, and yet they too depend on many conditions; being formed from conditions, the nature of the precepts is like emptiness. To rouse a mind that keeps them is what is called delusion turned upside down.” Although the precepts are the substance of brahmacarya, they are still formed from many conditions, and precepts formed from conditions are in their nature like emptiness; and if one rouses a mind that says I am keeping the precepts and clutches at them, that is delusion turned upside down. The true keeping is: “without goodness and without deportment, unmixed with the mind of the two vehicles — this is called keeping the pure precepts, and these precepts alone are named true brahmacarya.”
There is one more sentence to remember: although the objects contemplated run through both the great and the lesser vehicles, the wisdom that contemplates does not. Chengguan judges that “the objects contemplated run through both great and lesser, but the wisdom that contemplates is solely that of the great vehicle of the real teaching” — at one and the same ordination a śrāvaka too can contemplate, but what this chapter requires is the contemplating wisdom of the great vehicle of the real teaching. Where it comes home: this gate does not tell a person not to receive the precepts; it tells one who has received them not to take the receiving for the destination.
Concluding contemplation (1): nothing grasped in the three places, no transit through the three times
The pressing of the ten gates being finished, the scripture turns to the characteristics of contemplation accomplished: “there is nothing to be taken in the body, nothing to be clung to in what is cultivated, nothing to be dwelt in among the dharmas; the past has already ceased, the future has not yet come, the present is empty and still; there is no one who does the deeds, no one who receives the recompense; this world does not move over, that world does not alter.”
Chengguan divides these ten clauses into four layers. The first layer makes clear the contemplation that is pure in the three spheres — “the first six clauses make clear the contemplation pure in the three spheres: first, not grasping the being who keeps the precepts, and in saying body it takes in speech and thought as well; second, not clinging to the practices cultivated; third, not dwelling in the dharma of the precepts” — what is raised is only the three matters of not grasping the being who keeps the precepts, not clinging to the practices cultivated, and not dwelling in the dharma of the precepts, while the commentary’s text labels them “six clauses”; and the numbers of the four layers (six, three, two, two) likewise come to more than ten when added. There is such an unevenness in the ancient worthies’ own text; the divergence is recorded here, and no judgment is forced upon it. The next three clauses explain by way of the gate of the three times that one does not dwell in the time of keeping the precepts; of these the first two are easy to see, and the difficulty lies in “the present is empty and still”: since the present does not abide for even an instant and is divided by past and future, it too is empty and still. The next two clauses after that make clear the two emptinesses — that the person who does the deeds is the emptiness of self, and that the recompense of deeds received is the emptiness of dharmas.
The last two clauses repay reading most of all. Chengguan glosses: “this world does not move over means that it does not go from the present to the after; that world does not alter means that it does not come from the after to the present.” Since the cause has already ceased in the past, it has no power to reach forward into the future and bring about a fruit; and since the fruit is not simultaneous with the cause, it has no power to turn back and repay the cause. The conclusion is a single sentence: “because each thing abides in its own nature, and nature is fundamentally empty.” Where it comes home: this is not a denial of cause and effect; it says that cause and effect do not rely on some substantial thing being carried through time.
Concluding contemplation (2): then what after all is brahmacarya?
Next the scripture puts eleven questions in a row: “among these, which dharma is called brahmacarya? From what place does brahmacarya come? Whose possession is it? What is its substance? By whom is it made?” — and thereafter presses by way of the five aggregates: is it existent or nonexistent, form or not form, feeling or not feeling, perception or not perception, formations or not formations, consciousness or not consciousness.
Chengguan divides them: the first clause shows in general that brahmacarya has no name, since the ten dharmas are already empty; what follows refutes item by item — it does not arise from the ten dharmas, and it does not belong to the body and the rest as their possession, and these two clauses press with respect to conditions; there is no separate substance of the precepts apart from the ten dharmas, nor is there any agent that makes it, and these two clauses press with respect to substance; while the doubly negating clauses reveal the Middle Way.
The last five clauses are matched to the five aggregates, and he says they carry two purposes. The first is stated with respect to the substance of the precepts: of old some said that the substance of the non-manifest precepts is form, and some said it is neither form nor mind; the scripture’s asking “is it form” is meant to show that it is not form, and its asking “is it not form” is meant to show that it is not not-form. If it were said that the precepts are mind, then everything that has a mind ought always to have brahmacarya; and if they were not mind, then wood and stone ought to have brahmacarya too. The second is stated with respect to the fact that cultivating brahmacarya is not apart from the five aggregates: if brahmacarya were the aggregates, then whatever has aggregates would be brahmacarya; and if it were apart from the aggregates, where then would my brahmacarya be? And so the conclusion in both cases is that it cannot be obtained.
Where it comes home: this passage sends the noun brahmacarya itself into the pressing, and questions on until even the object of the question cannot stand.
Concluding contemplation (3): it is because it cannot be obtained that it is pure
Pressed to the very end of the road, the scripture gives its conclusion — and the conclusion is not nothingness, it is purity. The scripture says that brahmacarya is pure because “the dharma that is brahmacarya cannot be obtained; because the dharmas of the three times are all empty and still; because thought has no grasping; because the mind has no obstruction; because what is practised has no duality; because there is mastery in skillful means; because one receives the markless dharma; because one contemplates the markless dharma; because one knows that the Buddha’s dharmas are equal; because one is fully endowed with all the Buddha’s dharmas” — and after ten occurrences of the word “because,” “this is what is called pure brahmacarya.”
This is the most important turn in the whole chapter. The ten gates before it have been one long negation, and a reader who stops at the negation will suppose that the conclusion is there is no brahmacarya. The scripture’s conclusion is exactly the reverse: it is precisely because it cannot be obtained that it is called pure. Chengguan glosses these eleven clauses by saying that the first clause is the general one and the next nine display in particular the reasons for its not being obtained, and he matches them clause by clause: the three times are all empty; nothing is grasped in the body and nothing clung to in what is cultivated; the mind’s being unobstructed is the earlier not dwelling in the dharmas; the two thoughts of doing and receiving do not become active; though empty, it does not obstruct entering into existence; and entering into existence, one is not deluded about emptiness, and hence the two clauses of receiving and contemplating the markless; the eighth clause concludes by returning to equality, for which he cites the words of the perfection of wisdom, “I do not see a single dharma that is not the Buddha’s dharma,” as attestation; the ninth clause is that “taking one, one gathers all, and only so is the perfect interfusion of full endowment with the qualities made evident”; and the last clause sums up — it is by reason of all the foregoing senses that it is named pure brahmacarya.
Clear away an error: cannot be obtained does not mean does not exist; it means cannot be grasped. Where it comes home: if a person is still able to point at some thing and say this is my brahmacarya, then that very thing is the place that is not yet pure.
Further cultivating ten dharmas: after benefiting oneself, turning toward benefiting others
At this point the section on the purity of one’s own practice ends. The scripture says “he should further cultivate ten dharmas,” and lists the knowledge of what is possible and impossible, the knowledge of the recompense of deeds past, present, and future, the knowledge of the meditations and liberations and samādhis, the knowledge of superior and inferior faculties, the knowledge of the various understandings, the knowledge of the various realms, the knowledge of the paths leading to every destination, the knowledge of the unobstructed divine eye, the knowledge of the unobstructed recollection of former lives, and the knowledge that severs the habit-energies forever.
Ask first: it has just been said that nothing whatever can be obtained — how then is one to cultivate ten kinds of knowledge? It is exactly here that Chengguan marks the turn: the preceding section was the purity of one’s own practice, and here begins “making clear the purity of the practice of benefiting others,” and these ten knowledges are “first, deeply contemplating the knowledge that is the fruit, which is the means of benefiting others.” He has one sentence that joins the two sections beautifully: “the conditions and their substance stand out plainly, and the one mind is clear and still — this is the functioning of brahmacarya. Without thinking and without contriving, the myriad practices boil up; therefore it is not enough that the mind’s contemplation be perfectly bright, one should further gather in the Buddha’s knowledge broadly.” A perfectly bright contemplation of mind is only half; one must further gather in the Buddha’s knowledge broadly in order to be of use to others.
Clear away a common deviation: the notion that once emptiness is realized there is no more need to study. The scripture’s sequence is precisely the reverse — once the contemplation of emptiness is accomplished, what comes immediately next is a study list of ten items. Where it comes home: what cannot be obtained is the ground one occupies oneself; the ten knowledges are the equipment for dealing with others; the two are not in conflict.
Concerning the Tathāgata’s ten powers, examine each one, inquire about each one
The scripture goes on to say: “concerning the Tathāgata’s ten powers, examine each one; within each single power there are measureless meanings, and about them all one should inquire.”
This sentence is only twenty-one graphs long, yet it is the one place in this chapter that speaks directly of asking someone else. All the examination at the ten gates before was a pressing carried out by oneself, whereas here, over and above examining, inquiring is required — because within each power there are measureless meanings, and they cannot be exhausted by sitting and thinking alone. Chengguan judges this passage as “concluding with an exhortation to study broadly.”
Clear away an error: this does not contradict the “not from another that they awaken” further on. Inquiring is seeking understanding, while awakening is not sought from outside; the one is the gate of learning, the other the gate of realization. Where it comes home: refusing to ask others and taking oneself to be awakened, and asking the whole world and never realizing anything oneself, are two diseases, and this chapter treats one of them in each of the two places.
Rousing great kindness and compassion; knowing objects to be like an illusion
And after hearing, what is to be done? The scripture gives four things: “one should rouse the mind of great kindness and compassion, examining living beings and not abandoning them; deliberating upon the dharmas without ever resting; performing the highest works without seeking recompense; knowing objects to be like an illusion, like a dream, like a shadow, like an echo, and also like something conjured up.”
Chengguan matches these four clauses to the accomplishment of the four immeasurable minds: “first, kindness and compassion are roused together, like a mother cow following her calf; second, deliberating upon the medicines and the diseases accomplishes the great gladness; third, acting without seeking accomplishes the great equanimity; fourth, wisdom understanding all objects leads them to become objectless.” That kindness and compassion do not abandon living beings is like a mother cow following her calf; deliberating upon the medicines of the Dharma and the diseases of beings accomplishes the great gladness; acting without seeking recompense accomplishes the great equanimity; and wisdom’s penetrating that all objects are like an illusion makes the former three become objectless — not tied to any particular object.
The five similes at the end Chengguan glosses one by one: like an illusion is seeming to exist and yet not real, and “because it seems to exist it is provisional, and because it is not real it is empty; and these two being not two, the wisdom of the Middle Way is accomplished”; like a dream is what is seen falsely; like a shadow is what appears from the conditions of deeds; like an echo is what belongs to the various causes and conditions; like something conjured up is what changes and perishes in a moment. The conclusion is that “if one understands objects in this way, then all day long one transforms beings and yet there is no transforming.” Where it comes home: these five similes do not tell one to regard living beings as unreal and so not rescue them; on the contrary, they keep the work of deliverance from falling into the characteristics of a subject and an object — and this is what objectless kindness is.
The eye-sentence: at the time of the first arousing of the mind one attains unsurpassed perfect awakening
The last section of the chapter answers the second half of what Right Mindfulness asked — how from the stations of a bodhisattva one reaches unsurpassed awakening. The scripture says: “if bodhisattvas are able to accord with contemplative practice such as this, and give rise to no two views among the dharmas, all the Buddha’s dharmas will swiftly come present, and at the time of the first arousing of the mind they attain unsurpassed perfect awakening.”
This is the most famous sentence in the Avataṃsaka, and also the one most easily read as a grand claim. Put the doubt straight first: the first arousing of the mind is plainly the starting point of practice — how can it be unsurpassed awakening on the spot? Chengguan’s gloss proceeds in two steps. The first step answers “when is the swiftness?”: “above it said swiftly attain; when is the swiftness? Therefore it says, at the time of the first arousing of the mind. What dharma comes present? Unsurpassed awakening.” Only the second step answers why this can be so — and that reason lies in the next sentence of the scripture, namely “because one knows that all dharmas are the very nature of one’s own mind, and to awaken to the self-nature of dharmas is precisely what is named a Buddha.” He also cites another place in this same sūtra as attestation: “how should the Buddha-mind be anything other? Right awakening awakens the world.”
What matters most is Chengguan’s fixed gloss on the word “arousing”: “this being so, the arousing is the arousing of what opens out, not the arousing of what starts up.” Arousing is not the raising of a new thought from nothing into being; it is the opening out and disclosing of what was already there. This gloss of a single word decides that the whole sentence is not an exaggeration but a plain statement — at the very moment of disclosure, what is disclosed is complete of itself, and therefore it is said to be attained.
Fazang, glossing the same sentence in the sixty-fascicle text, takes the road of the mutual identity of the positions: “this makes clear that at the time when practice is fulfilled and one enters the position, one attains the position of Samantabhadra, and one position is all positions, so that up to the fruit of buddhahood there is nothing not perfectly complete,” and he concludes that “this practice-position of Samantabhadra in the One Vehicle is so because cause and effect are perfectly interfused, identical with one another and unobstructed.” Li Tongxuan, for his part, speaks from the exhaustion of views and the appearing of wisdom: “know then that when views perish and wisdom responds, this is named attaining right awakening at the time of the first arousing of the mind.” The three houses take different roads, and yet the misunderstanding they block is the same — none of them says once the mind is aroused there is no more need to practise.
The clearing away of error should be said more bluntly still: the scripture gives this sentence a premise clause — “if bodhisattvas are able to accord with contemplative practice such as this, and give rise to no two views among the dharmas.” Only if one can accord with that whole set of ten gates of pressing contemplation is there this sentence; to quote this sentence apart from that premise is to strip the conclusion off its condition. Where it comes home: the reason the first mind can accomplish right awakening is not that the first mind comes cheap; it is that within that first mind there are already no two views.
The closing sentences: knowing that all dharmas are the very nature of the mind, and not from another awakening
The scripture closes with three clauses: “they know that all dharmas are the very nature of their own mind, they perfect the body of wisdom, and it is not from another that they awaken.”
The first clause is the reason for the preceding one. Chengguan glosses: “since it says that one knows all dharmas to be the very nature of the mind, then one knows that this mind is the nature of all dharmas. Now that principle appears in one’s own mind, the nature of that mind is already furnished with measureless qualities.” All dharmas are the nature of one’s own mind, and conversely one’s own mind is the nature of all dharmas; and since principle has appeared in one’s own mind, the nature of this mind is already fully furnished with measureless merits — so that between the first mind and right awakening there is no stretch of distance to be crossed.
The second clause, “they perfect the body of wisdom,” Chengguan glosses with the simile of the mirror: “when the mind awakens, principle appears; when principle appears, wisdom is complete. It is like a mirror being clean and brightness arising: not before and not after, not new and not old, still and illumining and utterly clear.” When the mirror is wiped clean the brightness arises, and that brightness is neither newly made nor stored up from before; there is no earlier and later to be divided. He also sets before and after side by side: “above, the contemplation of dharmas was exhausted, and the true Dharma is about to flourish; now the views have perished, and the Buddha’s wisdom thereupon arises.”
The third clause, “not from another that they awaken,” Chengguan glosses as “this is the natural wisdom that has no teacher,” and he opens it into three senses: “moreover, not from another awakening is awakening oneself; knowing all dharmas is awakening others; and perfecting the body of wisdom is the fullness of awakening.” Awakening oneself, awakening others, and the fullness of awakening — all three senses are complete. And he lays down a thoroughly radical turning phrase: since the nature of mind has been spoken of, “consider: how should the nature of mind have any other? And if one sees that there is an other, how could it be called awakening? Since it is called the nature of mind, the self too does not remain.” Only when even the self is not set up is there the right awakening that is still and yet able to know.
Where it comes home: this chapter asks from what is still lacking after going forth and answers, at the last, that what is lacking is not one more thing to be added — it is the taking off, layer by layer, of every attachment laid upon brahmacarya, taking off until even the one who takes off does not remain, whereupon the body of wisdom that was there all along appears of itself.
Lineage
The meaning of this chapter is carried on by three lines in later ages; they are recorded together and not adjudicated. The Chengguan line: he explicates it under four gates — the reason for its coming, the explanation of the name, the tenet and aim, and the explanation of the text; he brings out three senses for the substance of brahmacarya, namely the precepts, the four immeasurables, and wisdom, each of the three senses being divided into two layers — the precepts into following characteristics and leaving characteristics, the four immeasurables into having an object and being objectless, wisdom into having discrimination and being without discrimination; he judges of the ten dharmas that “the first six run through defilement” while the latter four are purely pure, and on that basis establishes two ways of refutation; he fixes the word “arousing” as the arousing of what opens out; he opens “not from another awakening” into the three senses of awakening oneself, awakening others, and the fullness of awakening; and in the Yanyi chao he supplements the six senses for the chapter’s coming one meaning at a time, and makes clear that the contemplation of emptiness in the earlier section “is not annihilation.” The Fazang line: on the sixty-fascicle text he explains the name in three ways and establishes six distinctions between the pure and the brahma — with respect to recompense, with respect to persons, with respect to the position in practice, with respect to the two benefits, with respect to the two practices, and with respect to cause and effect — of which the fifth distinction fits this chapter most closely: “fifth, with respect to the two practices: to cultivate giving and the precepts and so forth in accordance with particular matters is pure practice; to leave thought behind and accord with the profound is brahma practice”; the section on the fruit he judges as two rounds displaying that a small cause obtains a great fruit, the second round setting up its heading with “the time of the first arousing of the mind is the cause, and thereupon accomplishing right awakening is the fruit,” and coming home to the perfect interfusion and mutual identity of cause and effect in the practice-position of Samantabhadra in the One Vehicle. The Li Tongxuan line: he reads it by symbolic import, glossing the master who asks as “the mindfulness that is the mindfulness of no-thought is named Right Mindfulness,” and the person able to expound as “to penetrate principle and let sentiment perish is named Dharma Wisdom”; moreover, in his own treatise he repeatedly calls this chapter by the name “Pure Conduct”, and divides the purifying practice of two positions — in the position of the ten faiths the purifying practice of the one hundred and forty vows accomplishes worldly knowing and seeing, whereas in the position of the ten abodes “because the substance of practice is unconditioned, it is named purifying practice”; and he closes with the successive turning of the several purities, practice being pure hence wisdom pure, wisdom pure hence mind pure, on up to the Dharma realm being pure and living beings being pure and the buddha-lands being pure. The roads walked by the three houses differ; there were of old these several accounts, and they are recorded here.
There are two places where the treatises of the Huayan school carry this chapter on. Zhiyan, in his book of chapter headings, sets up a chapter entitled “the chapter on the general contemplation first set forth in the Brahmacarya chapter,” taking the ten gates of this chapter as the locus classicus for the general contemplation; and Gyeondeung of Silla, in his book on the meaning of becoming a Buddha, cites the text of the five similes of this chapter, “like an echo, like something conjured, and so forth,” to prove that one practice is all practices. Both places cite this chapter as ground rather than glossing the whole of its text; recorded, not adjudicated.
This chapter follows upon “The Ten Abodes” and is followed by “The Merit of the First Arousing of the Mind”. Chengguan judges the fifth sense of this chapter’s coming to be “to display the cause of entering the abodes,” and the sixth to be “to display separately the becoming a Buddha in the first abode,” which shows exactly the place of this chapter, wedged between the positions and the merit: the preceding chapter states the characteristics of the position of the abodes, this chapter states the practice of the position of the abodes, and the following chapter is devoted to the merit of the first arousing of the mind — and the sentence set up at the end of this chapter, “at the time of the first arousing of the mind one attains unsurpassed perfect awakening,” is what the next chapter takes a whole chapter’s length to weigh and compare. The five similes of this chapter Chengguan further points out to be set forth at length in “The Ten Acceptances”; and the name of this chapter is established in contrast with “Pure Conduct” of the second assembly. A chapter of some nine hundred graphs, and on every side it has its attachments; it is not to be taken in isolation when read.
考據Apparatus
梵行品=第三會忉利天宮第四品。正念天子問「云何而得梵行清淨」〔T10n0279 0088b07〕,法慧菩薩答以十法為所緣作意觀察——身、身業、語、語業、意、意業、佛、法、僧、戒——十門逐一推徵,梵行俱不可得,乃名清淨梵行。次令復修如來十力之十智,起大慈悲,了境如幻,終歸於「初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,知一切法即心自性,成就慧身,不由他悟」〔T10n0279 0089a01〕。全品一問一答、無重頌,僅九百餘字,而華嚴「初心成佛」之一義即立於此。澄觀判此品十法「即為十段。前六通染」〔T35n1735 0641a17〕而後四唯淨,破法之式因之有別;「發」字作開發解而非發起解,亦澄觀所定。
一、科判定位
| 科判系統 | 此品之位 |
|---|---|
| 底本 T279 三十九品 | 品十六 梵行品(第三會 忉利天宮 · 卷十七〔T10n0279 0088b05〕起–下品〈初發心功德品第十七〉品題〔0089a04〕前訖) |
| 澄觀《華嚴經疏》 | 梵行品疏〔T35n1735 0640b14〕起–〔0643b08〕前訖。四門分別——來意(有六)· 釋名 · 宗趣 · 釋文 |
| 澄觀《隨疏演義鈔》 | 梵行品鈔〔T36n1736 0296b24〕起–〔0303b15〕前訖 |
| 法藏《探玄記》(六十華嚴疏) | 梵行品第十二〔T35n1733 0201a23〕起–〔0202c22〕前訖。開釋名 · 來意 · 宗趣三門 |
| 李通玄《新華嚴經論》 | 梵行品〔T36n1739 0835b18〕起–〔0836a19〕前訖。三門分別——釋品名目 · 釋品來意 · 隨文釋義 |
來意(澄觀六義)——
「初來意有六:一前是正位,今辨位中之行,故次來也;二前明諸位別行,今辨諸位通行;三前通道俗,今別顯出家所行;四前明隨相差別,今顯會緣入實;五為顯入住之因,謂自他二種梵行淨故,則入初住也」〔T35n1735 0640b15〕
「六別顯初住成佛,則類前諸位,位位成佛不由他悟之相也。」〔0640b20〕
《演義鈔》逐義補釋,第一義曰「初一行位相對,前雖有行,意在位故。」〔T36n1736 0296b24〕;第二義曰「今此梵行,十住通修故。」〔0296b29〕;第六義曰「六標釋相對,即總釋前義」〔0296c11〕,所總釋者即前十住品每位末之標句,故今釋云「與此觀行相應即得初心成佛,知一切法即心自性,成就慧身不由他悟。」〔0296c13〕
法藏於六十本立來意五義,首義云「一前位次行,謂前明正位,今辨成位之行」〔T35n1733 0201b06〕。李通玄則云「前品明住佛無所住之門故,還行無行之行,是故此品須來。」〔T36n1739 0835c03〕
宗趣——澄觀「三宗趣者,即以悲智無二、事理雙修觀行為宗,疾滿一切佛法為趣。」〔T35n1735 0640c17〕;探玄記作「三宗趣者,以無念正行為宗」〔T35n1733 0201b12〕。
釋文(澄觀)——
「第四釋文。文分為二:先問、後答。」〔T35n1735 0640c18〕
答文之分——
「今初,分二:先明自行清淨,即離相之戒成;後『復應修習』下明利他之行淨,即無緣之四等。」〔T35n1735 0640c29〕
自行清淨一段復分四——
「前中分四:一總示所應、二『所謂』下列名略釋、三『若身是』下廣陳修相、四『如是觀已』下顯觀成相。」〔T35n1735 0641a03〕
李通玄則以行數分七門:「三隨文釋義者,科此一品經,約作七門分別。」〔T36n1739 0835c07〕,逐門繫以經文行數(所請分三行 · 舉十法二行半 · 正行觀法二十六行半 · 通觀三世十行 · 復修十種法以下等)。
底本段界與澄觀四分一一相扣:問〔0088b06〕· 總示所應〔0088b09〕· 列名略釋〔0088b10〕· 廣陳修相〔0088b12〕· 顯觀成相〔0088c10〕· 利他行淨〔0088c21〕· 答果〔0088c29〕。
二、術語
| 漢 | 所徵 | 精義 |
|---|---|---|
| 梵行 | 澄觀:「梵是西域之音,具云勃嚂摩,此翻為淨。」〔T35n1735 0640b22〕 | 梵即淨。「離染中極故名為梵,即梵為行故名梵行,持業釋也。」〔0640b23〕 |
| 梵行之體(三義) | 澄觀:「體略有三:一者即戒,戒能防非故得稱梵;二者四等;三者是慧。」〔T35n1735 0640b26〕 | 「今此品中具含三義」〔0640b29〕,且三義各分隨相/離相、有緣/無緣、有分別/無分別二層 |
| 梵/淨之別 | 法藏立六別:「一約報,欲天為淨,色天為梵。二約人,在家戒是淨,出家戒為梵。三行位,信中修為淨行,入位已去修為梵行。」〔T35n1733 0201a28〕 | 第五別最切本品——「五約二行,隨事造修施戒等為淨行,離念契玄為梵行」〔0201b03〕 |
| 十法所緣 | 本品「應以十法而為所緣,作意觀察」〔T10n0279 0088b09〕 | 澄觀:「唯令觀十法者,一為成圓數;二梵行緣體不離此十,謂身口意三是行所依處,三業行因,三寶行緣,戒謂行體。」〔T35n1735 0641a08〕 |
| 作意觀察 | 本品同上句 | 澄觀:「作意者,不墮無記故。觀察者,以慧推求故。」〔T35n1735 0641a05〕 |
| 尋伺觀 | 澄觀:「第三廣陳修相,即尋伺觀也。」〔T35n1735 0641a16〕 | 十門推徵屬尋伺位之觀,至「如是觀已」以下方是觀成之相 |
| 通染/唯淨 | 澄觀:「十法即為十段。前六通染,是故但約染淨相違,名非梵行,亦不析破彼法自體。後四唯淨,順於梵行故,分析體空何有梵行。」〔T35n1735 0641a17〕 | 前六門與後四門破法之式不同——前六以染淨相違簡,後四以分析體空簡 |
| 三輪清淨觀 | 澄觀釋「於身無所取,於修無所著,於法無所住」〔T10n0279 0088c10〕:「初六句明三輪清淨觀」〔T35n1735 0642b08〕 | 不取能持戒之眾生 · 不著所修之行事 · 不住於戒法 |
| 無作戒體 | 澄觀:「有說:無作戒體,體即是色。有說:非色非心。」〔T35n1735 0642b27〕 | 經文「為是色,為非色」之五陰徵問,澄觀判有二意,一就戒體、二就修行不離五蘊 |
| 九十八使/百八煩惱 | 澄觀釋法門唯八句:「表除九十八使故,加十總觀破百八煩惱故。」〔T35n1735 0641c15〕 | 疏出二解:一疑「應梵本脫漏」〔0641c14〕,二「若約有所表者,表除九十八使故,加十總觀破百八煩惱故」〔0641c14〕 |
| 處非處智等十智 | 本品「處非處智、過現未來業報智、諸禪解脫三昧智」〔T10n0279 0088c22〕 | 即如來十力之智。澄觀:「初深觀果智,即利他之方。」〔T35n1735 0642c22〕 |
| 無緣四等 | 澄觀:「後慈念眾生成無緣四等」〔T35n1735 0642c23〕 | 慈悲喜捨四無量心之離相者。經文「應起大慈悲心,觀察眾生而不捨離」〔T10n0279 0088c26〕即其文 |
| 開發之發 | 澄觀:「斯則發者,是開發之發,非發起之發也。」〔T35n1735 0643a22〕 | 「初發心」之「發」訓為開顯本具,非新起一念 |
| 不由他悟 | 澄觀:「不由他悟者,成上慧身,即無師自然智也。」〔T35n1735 0643a29〕 | 又開三義——「又不由他悟是自覺也,知一切法是覺他也,成就慧身為覺滿也。」〔0643b01〕 |
三、譬喻·修辭
(一) 死屍蟲聚喻(身門十過之末二·經文自有)——「則為死屍、則為蟲聚。」〔T10n0279 0088b15〕:
- 喻依:屍與蟲聚。
- 喻體:身。
- 所顯義:澄觀配第九、第十兩過,第九「是身無知,又要當死,究竟不淨故」〔T35n1735 0641a27〕,第十「八萬戶蟲,戶有九億,全以蟲聚成其身故。」〔0641a27〕——身既是屍是蟲聚,則身非可軌之梵行體。
(二) 如幻如夢如影如響如變化 五喻(利他行段·經文自有)——「了知境界如幻如夢,如影如響,亦如變化。」〔T10n0279 0088c28〕:
- 澄觀通別二釋,別釋逐喻配義——「如幻似有,不實故。」〔T35n1735 0643a03〕;「如夢者,虛妄見故。如影者,從業緣現故。如響者,屬諸因緣故。如變化者,須臾變滅故。」〔0643a05〕
- 所顯義:「若如是了境,即終日化而無化」〔0643a07〕,四等由此成無緣。
- 出處之繫:澄觀云「此中五喻廣如十忍」〔T35n1735 0643a02〕,《演義鈔》補「疏文顯指〈十忍〉、闇用《淨名》」〔T36n1736 0303b07〕。
(三) 犢母隨子喻(注家喻·非經文)——澄觀釋四等文四句之首句:「一雙起慈悲,如犢母隨子」〔T35n1735 0642c29〕。所顯義:慈悲之不捨眾生如母牛之隨犢,念念不離。
(四) 鏡淨明生喻(注家喻·非經文)——澄觀釋「成就慧身」:「覺心則理現,理現則智圓。若鏡淨明生,非前非後、非新非故,寂照湛然。」〔T35n1735 0643a28〕。所顯義:慧身之成非新得一物,如鏡垢盡而明自現,明不從外來。
(五) 本品經文譬喻極省〔據實標闕〕——全品九百餘字,經文自設之喻唯身門末二句與末段五喻二處;十門推徵通篇作徵問句式,不設喻。餘所見之喻(犢母、鏡淨一類)皆出注家,非經文,已於上逐條標明。
四、異譯對勘
本品之漢譯校本:實叉難陀 T279(底本·〈梵行品第十六〉)· 佛馱跋陀羅 T278(晉譯六十華嚴·〈梵行品第十二〉〔T09n0278 0449a12〕起–〔0449c22〕前訖)。二本品名全同,非異名品。本品無別行經、無牒經論釋〔查無〕。以下逐句全錄不判。
句一 正念天子問
| 校本 | 逐字 | 出處 |
|---|---|---|
| 實叉 T279 | 一切世界諸菩薩眾,依如來教,染衣出家。云何而得梵行清淨,從菩薩位逮於無上菩提之道? | T10n0279 0088b06 |
| 佛馱 T278 | 一切世界中,諸菩薩摩訶薩信家、非家、出家學道,捨離俗飾,被服法衣,彼諸菩薩云何方便修習梵行,具足菩薩十住道地,速成無上平等菩提? | T09n0278 0449a13 |
異文所繫:(甲) 出家之相,80 作「依如來教,染衣出家」〔T10n0279 0088b07〕四字一句,60 作「信家、非家、出家學道,捨離俗飾,被服法衣」〔T09n0278 0449a14〕。(乙) 所求之果,80 作「從菩薩位逮於無上菩提之道」〔T10n0279 0088b08〕,60 明標「具足菩薩十住道地,速成無上平等菩提」〔T09n0278 0449a16〕——60 於問中即繫十住之位。(丙) 二本問者受者全同,皆正念天子白法慧菩薩。
句二 十法所緣總標
| 校本 | 逐字 | 出處 |
|---|---|---|
| 實叉 T279 | 應以十法而為所緣,作意觀察。所謂:身、身業、語、語業、意、意業、佛、法、僧、戒。 | T10n0279 0088b09 |
| 佛馱 T278 | 先當分別十種之法。何等為十?所謂:身、身業、口、口業、意、意業、佛、法、僧、戒 | T09n0278 0449a19 |
異文所繫:(甲) 80「以十法而為所緣,作意觀察」〔T10n0279 0088b09〕,60「分別十種之法」。(乙) 語業二目 80 作「語、語業」,60 作「口、口業」。(丙) 十目名次與次第二本全同。
句三 身門十過
| 校本 | 逐字 | 出處 |
|---|---|---|
| 實叉 T279 | 若身是梵行者,當知梵行則為非善、則為非法、則為渾濁、則為臭惡、則為不淨、則為可厭、則為違逆、則為雜染、則為死屍、則為蟲聚。 | T10n0279 0088b12 |
| 佛馱 T278 | 若身是梵行者,當知梵行則不清淨;當知梵行則為非法;當知梵行則為渾濁;當知梵行則為臭惡;當知梵行則為穢污;當知梵行則為塵垢;當知梵行則為諂曲;當知梵行則為八萬戶蟲。 | T09n0278 0449a21 |
異文所繫:80 列十過,60 列八過——60 無「非善」「可厭」「違逆」「雜染」「死屍」五目,「不淨」作「不清淨」,而有「穢污」「塵垢」「諂曲」三目。末目 80 作「蟲聚」,60 作「八萬戶蟲」;澄觀釋 80 之「蟲聚」正用八萬戶之數:「八萬戶蟲,戶有九億,全以蟲聚成其身故。」〔T35n1735 0641a27〕
句四 佛門十徵
| 校本 | 逐字 | 出處 |
|---|---|---|
| 實叉 T279 | 為色是佛耶?受是佛耶?想是佛耶?行是佛耶?識是佛耶?為相是佛耶?好是佛耶?神通是佛耶?業行是佛耶?果報是佛耶? | T10n0279 0088b25 |
| 佛馱 T278 | 為色是佛耶?為受、想、行、識是佛耶?為三十二相、八十種好是佛耶?為一切神通、業報是佛耶? | T09n0278 0449b07 |
異文所繫:80 開十目逐一徵之,60 合為四問——受想行識合一、相好合一、神通業報合一。80「相」「好」二目,60 作「三十二相」「八十種好」。
句五 僧門
| 校本 | 逐字 | 出處 |
|---|---|---|
| 實叉 T279 | 為預流向是僧耶?預流果是僧耶?一來向是僧耶?一來果是僧耶?不還向是僧耶?不還果是僧耶?阿羅漢向是僧耶?阿羅漢果是僧耶?三明是僧耶?六通是僧耶? | T10n0279 0088c02 |
| 佛馱 T278 | 為向須陀洹果是僧耶?為得須陀洹果是僧耶?為向斯陀含阿那含阿羅漢果是僧耶?為得斯陀含阿那含阿羅漢果是僧耶?為三明、六通是僧耶?為時解脫是僧耶?為非時解脫是僧耶? | T09n0278 0449b13 |
異文所繫:(甲) 果名 80 用玄奘系新譯『預流、一來、不還、阿羅漢』,60 用舊譯音寫『須陀洹、斯陀含、阿那含、阿羅漢』。(乙) 60 合斯陀含、阿那含、阿羅漢三果之向與得各為一問。(丙) 60 於三明六通後多「時解脫」「非時解脫」二目,80 無。
句六 戒門
| 校本 | 逐字 | 出處 |
|---|---|---|
| 實叉 T279 | 為壇場是戒耶?問清淨是戒耶?教威儀是戒耶?三說羯磨是戒耶?和尚是戒耶?阿闍梨是戒耶?鬀髮是戒耶?著袈裟衣是戒耶?乞食是戒耶?正命是戒耶? | T10n0279 0088c06 |
| 佛馱 T278 | 為戒場是戒耶?為十眾是戒耶?為問清淨、不清淨是戒耶?為戒師是戒耶?為三羯磨和尚是戒耶?為鬀髮、法服、乞食是戒耶? | T09n0278 0449b17 |
異文所繫:(甲) 80「壇場」↔ 60「戒場」。(乙) 60 有「十眾」一目,80 無;80 有「教威儀」「阿闍梨」「正命」三目,60 無。(丙) 80 開十目,60 開六問。
句七 結觀·三世不遷
| 校本 | 逐字 | 出處 |
|---|---|---|
| 實叉 T279 | 如是觀已,於身無所取,於修無所著,於法無所住;過去已滅,未來未至,現在空寂;無作業者,無受報者;此世不移動,彼世不改變。 | T10n0279 0088c10 |
| 佛馱 T278 | 又,知過去無所至,未來無所有,現在無作者、無知者、無受報者,此世不至彼世,彼世不至此世。 | T09n0278 0449b21 |
異文所繫:(甲) 80 首有「於身無所取,於修無所著,於法無所住」〔T10n0279 0088c10〕三句三輪清淨文,60 無。(乙) 三世句 80 作「過去已滅,未來未至,現在空寂」〔T10n0279 0088c11〕,60 作「過去無所至,未來無所有」〔T09n0278 0449b21〕。(丙) 不遷句 80 作「此世不移動,彼世不改變」〔T10n0279 0088c12〕,60 作「此世不至彼世,彼世不至此世」〔T09n0278 0449b23〕。
句八 復修十智
| 校本 | 逐字 | 出處 |
|---|---|---|
| 實叉 T279 | 處非處智、過現未來業報智、諸禪解脫三昧智、諸根勝劣智、種種解智、種種界智、一切至處道智、天眼無礙智、宿命無礙智、永斷習氣智。 | T10n0279 0088c22 |
| 佛馱 T278 | 是處非處智,去、來、現在諸業報智,一切諸禪三昧正受解脫垢淨起智,眾生諸根智,隨諸欲樂智,種種性智,至一切處道智,無障礙宿命智,無障礙天眼智,斷習氣智 | T09n0278 0449c04 |
異文所繫:(甲) 第八、第九二智之次第二本相反——80 作「天眼無礙智、宿命無礙智」〔T10n0279 0088c24〕,60 作「無障礙宿命智,無障礙天眼智」〔T09n0278 0449c07〕。(乙) 80「種種解智」↔ 60「隨諸欲樂智」;80「種種界智」↔ 60「種種性智」。(丙) 80「永斷習氣智」↔ 60「斷習氣智」,且 60 末有「是為十」結句,80 無。
句九 五喻
| 校本 | 逐字 | 出處 |
|---|---|---|
| 實叉 T279 | 了知境界如幻如夢,如影如響,亦如變化。 | T10n0279 0088c28 |
| 佛馱 T278 | 觀一切法如幻、如夢、如電、如響、如化。 | T09n0278 0449c11 |
異文所繫:二本皆五喻,而喻目不同——80 有「如影」,60 有「如電」;餘幻、夢、響、化四喻同。
句十 答果·初發心時
| 校本 | 逐字 | 出處 |
|---|---|---|
| 實叉 T279 | 初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,知一切法即心自性,成就慧身,不由他悟。 | T10n0279 0089a01 |
| 佛馱 T278 | 初發心時,便成正覺,知一切法真實之性,具足慧身,不由他悟。 | T09n0278 0449c14 |
異文所繫:(甲) 果名 80 作「即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」〔T10n0279 0089a02〕,60 作「便成正覺」。(乙) 所知 80 作「一切法即心自性」,60 作「一切法真實之性」。(丙) 慧身 80 作「成就」,60 作「具足」。(丁) 「不由他悟」四字二本全同。法藏所釋即 60 之文:「標者,初發心時是因、便成正覺是果。」〔T35n1733 0202c11〕
全錄不判:以上十句之異,或開合之異(佛門十徵對四問 · 戒門十目對六問)、或目數之異(身門十過對八過 · 僧門之時解脫二目 · 五喻之影電)、或譯語之異(語口 · 預流須陀洹 · 即心自性/真實之性),或次第之異(天眼宿命二智),二本並錄,不判優劣。
五、宗義之經據〔眼〕
(一) 初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提——本品之眼句,經文自有:「若諸菩薩能與如是觀行相應,於諸法中不生二解,一切佛法疾得現前,初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」〔T10n0279 0088c29〕。澄觀先釋「疾」字之時:
「上言疾得,疾在何時?故云初發心時。何法現前?謂無上菩提也。」〔T35n1735 0643a16〕
次釋其所以然:
「夫初心為始、正覺為終,何以初心便成正覺?故今釋云:知一切法即心自性故,覺法自性即名為佛。」〔T35n1735 0643a18〕
並引本經他處為證:「故下經云「佛心豈有他,正覺覺世間。」斯良證也。」〔T35n1735 0643a20〕;復定「發」字之訓:「斯則發者,是開發之發,非發起之發也。」〔0643a22〕
法藏於六十本釋同一句,繫之於普賢行位之因果圓融:
「此明行滿入位時,即得普賢位故,一位即一切位,乃至佛果無不圓備,故云正覺。」〔T35n1733 0202c15〕
「此一乘普賢行位,因果圓融相即無礙故致然也」〔T35n1733 0202c19〕
並引經證「初發心菩薩即是佛故,悉與三世諸如來等。」〔0202c14〕。李通玄則歸之於見亡智現:「是知見亡智應,名初發心時便成正覺,成就慧身不由他悟。」〔T36n1739 0836a05〕
(二) 知一切法即心自性——澄觀釋此句為現前之相,亦是其所以然之出處:
「既言知一切法即心自性,則知此心即一切法性。今理現自心,即心之性已備無邊之德矣。」〔T35n1735 0643a24〕
(三) 十法之所以為十——澄觀答「何要觀耶」之問,立二義:一為成圓數,二「梵行緣體不離此十」〔T35n1735 0641a08〕,三業為行所依處、三業為行因、三寶為行緣、戒為行體。觀法之式則是:
「意云:十中隨一,若是餘九,即非明假眾緣以顯無性。況十中各十,一一推徵相盡理現,名真梵行。」〔T35n1735 0641a14〕
(四) 前六通染·後四唯淨之破法二式——
「十法即為十段。前六通染,是故但約染淨相違,名非梵行,亦不析破彼法自體。後四唯淨,順於梵行故,分析體空何有梵行。」〔T35n1735 0641a17〕
此判定全品十門之讀法:身至意業六門以染淨相違而簡,佛法僧戒四門則須析其體空。
(五) 梵行之體三義各二——澄觀出體:
「梵行以何為體?體略有三:一者即戒,戒能防非故得稱梵;二者四等;三者是慧。」〔T35n1735 0640b26〕
「上三中二義,各初義通凡小、後義唯大乘,此二不二為實教梵行。若一行具一切佛法,方是華嚴之梵行也。」〔T35n1735 0640c09〕
戒之二者,隨相即「依如來教,染衣出家乞食正命」〔0640c02〕,離相即「於修無所著則戒相如虛空」〔0640c03〕;四等之二者,有緣、無緣,無緣即「了知境界如幻如夢」〔T10n0279 0088c28〕;慧之二者,有分別即「於十法一一推徵」,無分別即「觀無相法,了知平等離念契玄」〔0640c08〕。
(六) 能觀之智唯實教大乘——所觀之境雖通大小,能觀之智不通:
「此上十境,正約菩薩,傍兼聲聞,設依小受修觀則為菩薩」〔T35n1735 0642a28〕
「故所觀境通於大小,其能觀智唯實教大乘。」〔T35n1735 0642b01〕
(七) 淨行與梵行之分際——澄觀:「然前信中之淨,隨事造修悲智兼導,至此純熟,了心自性悲智無二,故小有不同。」〔T35n1735 0640c15〕;法藏立六別,第五別即此意:「五約二行,隨事造修施戒等為淨行,離念契玄為梵行」〔T35n1733 0201b03〕。
六、諸家異釋(古德·標宗)
澄觀《華嚴經疏》T35n1735 ·《演義鈔》T36n1736(八十華嚴逐文·主)
釋名之三說並存——澄觀於持業釋外,錄二種依主釋:「亦有云:真境為梵,智契為行。或涅槃為梵,修因為行。此二依主釋。」〔T35n1735 0640b25〕
法門唯八句之二解——十門之中唯法門列八目,澄觀設二解而不定一:
「第八觀法。但有八句者,應梵本脫漏,豈餘九皆十,此獨八耶?若約有所表者,表除九十八使故,加十總觀破百八煩惱故。」〔T35n1735 0641c13〕
前解疑梵本有脫,後解以八表除九十八使之數,二解並列。
佛門之三身二判——澄觀釋佛門十目為觀三身,而小乘、大乘所配不同:
「若依小乘,初五法身,以無漏戒等及眷屬無漏五蘊為法身故。次二報身,以三祇百劫所修感相好故。次一化身,神通化現故。」〔T35n1735 0641b29〕
「若依大乘,前八皆是化身,後一報身。」〔T35n1735 0641c04〕
破法則引《中論》:「非陰不離陰,此彼不相在。如來不有陰,何處有如來。」〔T35n1735 0641c08〕,結曰「是知真佛既超心境,依斯成行,行豈相耶?」〔0641c12〕
僧門之詳略自限——澄觀列四向四果之斷惑分齊已,自止其廣:「今此欲明梵行,粗陳名目,若廣引《婆沙》、《俱舍》、《雜集》、《瑜伽》則清淨梵行有累名數,力有餘者付在說時。」〔T35n1735 0642a10〕
戒門之無作戒體二說——「有說:無作戒體,體即是色。有說:非色非心。」〔T35n1735 0642b27〕,澄觀據經文「為是色,為非色」之雙非以顯中,二說皆不取為定執。
《演義鈔》之補——鈔於觀空處揀曰「以前觀空非斷滅故。」〔T36n1736 0303b04〕;於「不由他悟」四字判含三義,「謂見夫心性,性外皆他,自亦不存,兼顯以心為自、心外為他。」〔0303b10〕;並繫此義於前品:「前〈十住品〉從麁至細,今此以細況麁耳。」〔0303b13〕
法藏《探玄記》T35n1733(六十華嚴疏〈梵行品第十二〉)
釋名三說——「初釋名者,離妄念之染故云梵,會無我理故云行,此行即梵。」〔T35n1733 0201a24〕,次「二離染中極名梵,即真境也;智能證此,故云行。」〔0201a25〕,三「三涅槃果為梵,以寂靜故;修因為行。」〔0201a26〕
淨梵六別——「有六別:一約報,欲天為淨,色天為梵。二約人,在家戒是淨,出家戒為梵。三行位,信中修為淨行,入位已去修為梵行。」〔T35n1733 0201a28〕,四約二利,「三學自利為淨行,四等利他為梵行」〔0201b02〕,五約二行,六約因果「涅槃為淨,道諦行為梵」〔0201b05〕。
果段二重顯少因得大果——「起後中兩重,顯少因得大果。」〔T35n1733 0202c07〕,初重以少方便為因、疾得為果,第二重「標者,初發心時是因、便成正覺是果。」〔0202c11〕,並釋「今釋:發心時即得故。」〔0202c13〕
李通玄《新華嚴經論》T36n1739(表法異軌)
釋品名目以行體無得立義——「梵者,此云淨也。以其淨行利眾生故,常居世間行一切行化利眾生,無行可得則無行不淨,是故名為梵行也。」〔T36n1739 0835b21〕
問答二主表法——「無念之念名為正念,隨行無念名為正念。」〔T36n1739 0835b24〕;「隨行無念名之為法,以法簡情名之為慧。起情乖理名無法慧,達理情亡名為法慧。」〔0835b27〕
品名之異稱——李通玄於本論屢以〈淨行品〉稱本品:「今約能問之主、所說法人及所說法,總名〈淨行品〉者,均分理教義。」〔T36n1739 0835b29〕;又「此〈淨行品〉成十住中初發心之佛果」〔0836a12〕。並以位分二淨行:「如一百四十願名淨行者,十信位願中以成世間,知見萬法以為淨行。此十住位中以行體無為,名為淨行。」〔0836a09〕
淨之遞轉——「諸行淨即智慧淨,智慧淨故其心淨,心淨即諸法淨,諸法淨故名法界淨,法界淨即其眾生淨,眾生淨即佛國土淨。」〔T36n1739 0836a15〕
誌錄不判
澄觀以四門分別逐文科釋,出梵行體之戒、四等、慧三義而各分二層,判前六通染後四唯淨,並定「發」為開發之發;法藏於六十本以三說釋名、立淨梵六別,判果段為二重顯少因得大果,歸之於普賢行位因果圓融;李通玄以表法讀之,就能問之主與能說之人立無念之義,且於本論中以〈淨行品〉之名稱本品,復分十信位之淨行與十住位之淨行為二。三家並行,皆古德成說。法門唯八句,澄觀出梵本脫漏與表破百八煩惱二解;無作戒體,古有即色與非色非心二說;此二處澄觀自錄二說而未定一,錄其原文,不另評騭。60 本作「便成正覺」、80 本作「即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」〔T10n0279 0089a02〕,二本並錄。皆誌錄之,不判高下。
七、互讀·承衍
- 前後品之繫:本品承〈十住品第十五〉、下接〈初發心功德品第十七〉。澄觀繫之曰「五為顯入住之因,謂自他二種梵行淨故,則入初住也」〔T35n1735 0640b18〕;李通玄繫曰「前品明住佛無所住之門故,還行無行之行,是故此品須來。」〔T36n1739 0835c03〕。下品專明初發心功德,正與本品末句「初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」〔T10n0279 0089a01〕相銜。
- 與〈淨行品〉之繫:本品之名與第二會〈淨行品〉相對而立,澄觀「揀上淨行立梵行名」〔T35n1735 0640b23〕即指此;法藏六別、李通玄二位淨行之分(十信位一百四十願之淨行對十住位行體無為之淨行〔T36n1739 0836a09〕)皆此一繫之展開。
- 與〈十住品〉之繫:《演義鈔》判本品第六來意為總釋前十住品每位末之標句〔T36n1736 0296c11〕,又於「不由他悟」〔T36n1736 0303b10〕處云「前〈十住品〉從麁至細,今此以細況麁耳。」〔0303b13〕。
- 與〈十忍品〉之繫:五喻之廣說,澄觀指「此中五喻廣如十忍」〔T35n1735 0643a02〕。
- 華嚴宗論之承:智儼《華嚴經內章門等雜孔目章》T45n1870 立「梵行品初明通觀章」為章目〔T45n1870 0548a20〕,同章題於〔0550a24〕重出;又於品次列名處作「十菩薩說住品第十九 梵行品第二十」〔0588b11〕——此為孔目章自身之章次編號,非本品品第,誌錄之。新羅見登《華嚴一乘成佛妙義》T45n1890 引本品五喻文以證一行即一切行:「如響如化等故。一行即一切行等。故梵行品」〔T45n1890 0777b24〕。
- 〔查無〕:《華嚴一乘教義分齊章》T45n1866 ·《十玄門》T45n1868 ·《法界玄鏡》T45n1883 ·《還源觀》T45n1876 四書「梵行品」零命中,記闕。本品無牒經論釋之別行論(不同於〈十地品〉之有《十地經論》),記闕。
- 〔未錄〕:〈十地品〉與成唯識等承衍論之「初發心」句獨立對位,本品所錄範圍未及,非零命中,據實標闕。
八、校本定位
- 實叉 T279(底本):〈梵行品第十六〉〔T10n0279 0088b05〕起(品題行)–下品〈初發心功德品第十七〉品題〔0089a04〕前訖。問 0088b06 · 十法總標 0088b09 · 身門 0088b12 · 身業門 0088b15 · 語門 0088b17 · 語業門 0088b18 · 意門 0088b20 · 意業門 0088b23 · 佛門 0088b24 · 法門 0088b28 · 僧門 0088c02 · 戒門 0088c06 · 結觀三輪 0088c10 · 體徵十一句 0088c13 · 清淨梵行結 0088c17 · 復修十智 0088c21 · 十力諮問 0088c25 · 起悲五喻 0088c26 · 答果初發心 0089a01 · 不由他悟 0089a02。全品漢字九百一十七、含標點非空白字元一千一百一十四(計法:去品題行與頁碼行,本單元原典層正文四行實計)。
- 佛馱 T278(晉譯主對校):〈梵行品第十二〉〔T09n0278 0449a12〕起–下品〈初發心菩薩功德品第十三〉品題〔0449c22〕前訖。問 0449a13 · 十法總標 0449a19 · 身門 0449a21 · 身業門 0449a26 · 口門 0449a28 · 口業門 0449b02 · 意門 0449b03 · 意業門 0449b05 · 佛門 0449b07 · 法門 0449b09 · 僧門 0449b12 · 戒門 0449b17 · 結觀 0449b21 · 體徵 0449b23 · 清淨梵行結 0449c02 · 復修十智 0449c03 · 十力觀察起悲 0449c08 · 五喻 0449c11 · 答果 0449c14。卷界:卷第八訖 0449c16 · 卷第九起 0449c19。
- 澄觀《疏》T35n1735:梵行品疏 0640b14 起(來意六義 0640b15 · 釋名 0640b22 · 出體三義 0640b26 · 三義各二 0640c01 · 宗趣 0640c17 · 釋文分二 0640c18 · 問答二人 0640c19 · 問相有二 0640c24 · 答分二 0640c27 · 自行分四 0641a03 · 十法之所以 0641a08 · 廣陳修相 0641a16 · 十段染淨二式 0641a17 · 身門十過 0641a21 · 身業門 0641b03 · 語門 0641b05 · 語業門 0641b08 · 意門 0641b10 · 意業門 0641b21 · 佛門三身 0641b28 · 中論引 0641c08 · 法門八句二解 0641c13 · 僧門 0641c25 · 四向四果 0642a03 · 戒門 0642a18 · 觀成之相 0642b03 · 三輪清淨 0642b08 · 不遷釋 0642b16 · 體徵十一句 0642b19 · 五陰二意 0642b26 · 結成清淨 0642c10 · 大般若引 0642c17 · 利他行淨 0642c21 · 無緣四等四句 0642c29 · 五喻別釋 0643a03 · 答果 0643a09 · 疾在何時 0643a16 · 初心成正覺之所以 0643a18 · 下經引 0643a21 · 開發之發 0643a22 · 現前之相 0643a23 · 成就慧身 0643a26 · 不由他悟三義 0643a29 ·「梵行品竟」0643b06)–0643b08 前訖。
- 澄觀《鈔》T36n1736:梵行品鈔 0296b24 起(來意六義逐釋 0296b24 · 十住通修 0296b29 · 隨相實相對 0296c03 · 因果相對 0296c07 · 標釋相對 0296c11 · 釋名四分 0296c15)–0303b15 前訖(觀空非斷滅 0303b04 · 五喻指十忍用淨名 0303b06 · 不由他悟三義 0303b10 · 況前十住品 0303b13)。
- 法藏《探玄記》T35n1733:〈梵行品第十二〉0201a23 起(釋名三說 0201a24 · 淨梵六別 0201a27 · 來意五義 0201b06 · 宗趣 0201b12)· 果段二重 0202c07 · 初發心時是因 0202c11 · 引經證 0202c14 · 一位即一切位 0202c15 · 因果圓融 0202c19 –0202c22 前訖。
- 李通玄《論》T36n1739:梵行品 0835b18 起(三門分別 0835b19 · 釋品名目 0835b21 · 正念表法 0835b24 · 法慧表法 0835b27 · 淨行品之稱 0835b29 · 釋品來意 0835c03 · 七門科文 0835c07 · 逐門行數 0835c08–0835c15 · 智現一體非遙 0835c23 · 見亡智應初發心便成正覺 0836a05 · 二位淨行 0836a09 · 諸淨遞轉 0836a15)–0836a19 前訖。
- 華嚴宗論:智儼《孔目章》T45n1870(0548a20 · 0550a24 章題 · 0588b11 品次列名)· 見登《華嚴一乘成佛妙義》T45n1890(0777b24 引五喻文)——皆列名或引證,誌錄不判。
- 異讀:本單元 T279 範圍〔0088b05〕–〔0089a03〕內大正校記 4 條,逐條照錄不判(底本【大】|他本異讀;多本異讀以/分列):〔0088b19〕諭【大】|喻【宮】 · 〔0088b28〕耶【大】|耶不隨順是法……得是法耶(凡13字)【明】 · 〔0088c08〕和尚【大】|和上【聖】 · 〔0088c08〕鬀【大】|剃【宮】。夾注(音注·校注)已於原典層剝除誌錄。原典層
□缺字符零命中。 - 異讀補記:CBETA 回改 1 條(不入上列大正校記之數):〔0088b17〕唇【CB】|胸【大】/唇【明】【宮】。
The Brahmacarya chapter = the fourth chapter of the third assembly, in the palace of the Trāyastriṃśa Heaven. The deva-son Right Mindfulness asks 「云何而得梵行清淨」 tr. “how is purity of brahmacarya to be attained?” 〔T10n0279 0088b07〕, and the bodhisattva Dharma Wisdom answers by taking ten dharmas as objects and rousing the attention to examine them — body, bodily action, speech, verbal action, thought, mental action, the Buddha, the Dharma, the Saṅgha, the precepts. The ten gates press each in turn, brahmacarya is in none of them to be obtained, and this is what is named pure brahmacarya. Next he is made further to cultivate the ten knowledges that are the Tathāgata’s ten powers, to rouse great kindness and compassion, and to know objects as illusory, coming home at last to 「初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,知一切法即心自性,成就慧身,不由他悟」 tr. “at the time of the first arousing of the mind one attains unsurpassed perfect awakening, knows that all dharmas are the very nature of the mind, perfects the body of wisdom, and it is not from another that one awakens” 〔T10n0279 0089a01〕. The whole chapter is one question and one answer, without repetition in verse, and runs to little more than nine hundred graphs; yet the Huayan sense of 「初心成佛」 tr. “becoming a Buddha with the first mind” is established just here. Chengguan judges the ten dharmas of this chapter to be 「即為十段。前六通染」 tr. “ten sections; the first six run through defilement” 〔T35n1735 0641a17〕, while the latter four are purely pure, and the form of refutation differs accordingly; that the word 「發」 tr. “arousing” is taken as opening out and not as starting up is likewise Chengguan’s determination.
I. Doctrinal Outline and Placement
| Outline system | The place of this chapter within it |
|---|---|
| The base text T279, in thirty-nine chapters | Chapter sixteen, The Practice of Brahmacarya (the third assembly, the palace of the Trāyastriṃśa Heaven · fascicle seventeen, beginning at 〔T10n0279 0088b05〕 and ending before the chapter title of the following chapter, “The Merit of the First Arousing of the Mind, Seventeen”, at 〔0089a04〕) |
| Chengguan, Huayan jing shu | The commentary on the Brahmacarya chapter begins at 〔T35n1735 0640b14〕 and ends before 〔0643b08〕. Analysed under four gates — the reason for its coming (six senses) · the explanation of the name · the tenet and aim · the explanation of the text |
| Chengguan, Suishu yanyi chao (the Yanyi chao) | The subcommentary on the Brahmacarya chapter begins at 〔T36n1736 0296b24〕 and ends before 〔0303b15〕 |
| Fazang, Tanxuan ji (commentary on the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka) | The Brahmacarya chapter, twelfth, begins at 〔T35n1733 0201a23〕 and ends before 〔0202c22〕. Opened under three gates: the explanation of the name · the reason for its coming · the tenet and aim |
| Li Tongxuan, Xin Huayan jing lun | The Brahmacarya chapter begins at 〔T36n1739 0835b18〕 and ends before 〔0836a19〕. Analysed under three gates — explaining the chapter’s title · explaining the reason for the chapter’s coming · explaining the meaning as the text proceeds |
The reason for its coming (Chengguan’s six senses) —
「初來意有六:一前是正位,今辨位中之行,故次來也;二前明諸位別行,今辨諸位通行;三前通道俗,今別顯出家所行;四前明隨相差別,今顯會緣入實;五為顯入住之因,謂自他二種梵行淨故,則入初住也」 tr. “First, the reason for its coming has six senses. First, what preceded was the positions proper, and now what is distinguished is the practice within the positions, and therefore it comes next. Second, what preceded made clear the particular practices of the several positions, and now what is distinguished is the practice common to all the positions. Third, what preceded ran through both the way and the world, and now what is displayed separately is what those who have gone forth practise. Fourth, what preceded made clear the differences that follow characteristics, and now what is displayed is the gathering in of conditions and entering into the real. Fifth, it is to display the cause of entering the abodes: that is, because the two kinds of brahmacarya, one’s own and others’, are pure, one enters the first abode.” 〔T35n1735 0640b15〕
「六別顯初住成佛,則類前諸位,位位成佛不由他悟之相也。」 tr. “Sixth, it displays separately the becoming a Buddha in the first abode, which is then to be extended to all the preceding positions — the characteristic of becoming a Buddha at each and every position, and not from another awakening.” 〔0640b20〕
The Yanyi chao supplements the senses one by one: on the first it says 「初一行位相對,前雖有行,意在位故。」 tr. “The first sets practice and position over against one another: although there was practice before, the intent lay in the position.” 〔T36n1736 0296b24〕; on the second, 「今此梵行,十住通修故。」 tr. “The brahmacarya here is cultivated in common throughout the ten abodes.” 〔0296b29〕; on the sixth, 「六標釋相對,即總釋前義」 tr. “The sixth sets the heading and the explanation over against one another, that is, it explains the preceding senses in general” 〔0296c11〕 — and what is thus explained in general is the heading clause at the end of each position in the preceding Ten Abodes chapter, so that the present gloss says 「與此觀行相應即得初心成佛,知一切法即心自性,成就慧身不由他悟。」 tr. “to accord with this contemplative practice is to attain the becoming a Buddha with the first mind, to know that all dharmas are the very nature of the mind, to perfect the body of wisdom, and not from another to awaken.” 〔0296c13〕
Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, establishes five senses for its coming, the first of which reads 「一前位次行,謂前明正位,今辨成位之行」 tr. “First, position followed by practice: that is, what preceded made clear the positions proper, and now what is distinguished is the practice that accomplishes the positions” 〔T35n1733 0201b06〕. Li Tongxuan says 「前品明住佛無所住之門故,還行無行之行,是故此品須來。」 tr. “Because the preceding chapter made clear the gate of abiding in the Buddha’s non-abiding, one turns back and practises the practice of no practice; therefore this chapter must come.” 〔T36n1739 0835c03〕
The tenet and aim — Chengguan: 「三宗趣者,即以悲智無二、事理雙修觀行為宗,疾滿一切佛法為趣。」 tr. “Third, the tenet and the aim: the tenet is the contemplative practice in which compassion and wisdom are not two and phenomena and principle are cultivated together, and the aim is the swift fulfilment of all the Buddha’s dharmas.” 〔T35n1735 0640c17〕; the Tanxuan ji has 「三宗趣者,以無念正行為宗」 tr. “Third, the tenet and the aim: the tenet is the right practice of no-thought” 〔T35n1733 0201b12〕.
The explanation of the text (Chengguan) —
「第四釋文。文分為二:先問、後答。」 tr. “Fourth, the explanation of the text. The text divides into two: first the question, then the answer.” 〔T35n1735 0640c18〕
The division of the answer —
「今初,分二:先明自行清淨,即離相之戒成;後『復應修習』下明利他之行淨,即無緣之四等。」 tr. “Now the first divides into two: first it makes clear the purity of one’s own practice, that is, the accomplishing of the precepts that leave characteristics behind; then from ‘he should further cultivate’ onward it makes clear the purity of the practice of benefiting others, that is, the four immeasurables that are objectless.” 〔T35n1735 0640c29〕
The section on the purity of one’s own practice divides further into four —
「前中分四:一總示所應、二『所謂』下列名略釋、三『若身是』下廣陳修相、四『如是觀已』下顯觀成相。」 tr. “Within the former there are four: first, showing in general what is to be done; second, from ‘they are’ onward, listing the names and explaining them briefly; third, from ‘if the body is’ onward, setting forth at length the characteristics of cultivation; fourth, from ‘having examined in this way’ onward, displaying the characteristics of contemplation accomplished.” 〔T35n1735 0641a03〕
Li Tongxuan, for his part, divides it into seven gates by the count of lines: 「三隨文釋義者,科此一品經,約作七門分別。」 tr. “Third, explaining the meaning as the text proceeds: this one chapter of the sūtra is outlined and analysed under seven gates.” 〔T36n1739 0835c07〕, attaching to each gate the number of lines of scripture (the request occupying three lines · the raising of the ten dharmas two and a half lines · the proper practice of contemplation twenty-six and a half lines · the general contemplation of the three times ten lines · the further cultivation of ten dharmas and what follows, and so forth).
The section boundaries of the base text interlock one by one with Chengguan’s fourfold division: the question 〔0088b06〕 · showing in general what is to be done 〔0088b09〕 · listing the names and explaining them briefly 〔0088b10〕 · setting forth at length the characteristics of cultivation 〔0088b12〕 · displaying the characteristics of contemplation accomplished 〔0088c10〕 · the purity of the practice of benefiting others 〔0088c21〕 · the answer as to the fruit 〔0088c29〕.
II. Terminology
| Term | Attestation | Essential sense |
|---|---|---|
| brahmacarya | Chengguan: 「梵是西域之音,具云勃嚂摩,此翻為淨。」 tr. “Brahma is a sound of the Western Regions; stated in full it is brahma, and translated here it is pure.” 〔T35n1735 0640b22〕 | Brahma is purity. 「離染中極故名為梵,即梵為行故名梵行,持業釋也。」 tr. “Because it is the utmost in leaving defilement it is named brahma; and because brahma itself is the practice it is named brahmacarya — this is the appositional compound.” 〔0640b23〕 |
| the substance of brahmacarya (three senses) | Chengguan: 「體略有三:一者即戒,戒能防非故得稱梵;二者四等;三者是慧。」 tr. “In brief the substance has three senses: first, it is the precepts, since the precepts can guard against wrong and so may be called brahma; second, the four immeasurables; third, wisdom.” 〔T35n1735 0640b26〕 | 「今此品中具含三義」 tr. “this chapter contains all three senses together” 〔0640b29〕, and each of the three senses divides into two layers: following characteristics and leaving characteristics; having an object and being objectless; having discrimination and being without discrimination |
| the difference between the pure and the brahma | Fazang establishes six distinctions: 「一約報,欲天為淨,色天為梵。二約人,在家戒是淨,出家戒為梵。三行位,信中修為淨行,入位已去修為梵行。」 tr. “First, with respect to recompense: the desire heavens are the pure, the form heavens the brahma. Second, with respect to persons: the precepts of one in the household are the pure, the precepts of one gone forth the brahma. Third, the position in practice: what is cultivated within the faiths is pure practice, and what is cultivated from entering the positions onward is brahma practice.” 〔T35n1733 0201a28〕 | The fifth distinction fits this chapter most closely — 「五約二行,隨事造修施戒等為淨行,離念契玄為梵行」 tr. “fifth, with respect to the two practices: to cultivate giving and the precepts and the rest in accordance with particular matters is pure practice; to leave thought behind and accord with the profound is brahma practice” 〔0201b03〕 |
| the ten dharmas as objects | This chapter: 「應以十法而為所緣,作意觀察」 tr. “he should take ten dharmas as his objects, rouse the attention and examine” 〔T10n0279 0088b09〕 | Chengguan: 「唯令觀十法者,一為成圓數;二梵行緣體不離此十,謂身口意三是行所依處,三業行因,三寶行緣,戒謂行體。」 tr. “That he is made to contemplate only ten dharmas is, first, in order to make up a round number; second, because the conditions and the substance of brahmacarya are not apart from these ten — that is, body, mouth, and thought, these three, are the places on which practice depends; the three actions are the causes of practice; the three jewels are the conditions of practice; and the precepts are called the substance of practice.” 〔T35n1735 0641a08〕 |
| rousing the attention and examining | The same clause of this chapter | Chengguan: 「作意者,不墮無記故。觀察者,以慧推求故。」 tr. “To rouse the attention is not to fall into the indeterminate. To examine is to search out by means of wisdom.” 〔T35n1735 0641a05〕 |
| the contemplation of initial and sustained thought | Chengguan: 「第三廣陳修相,即尋伺觀也。」 tr. “Third, setting forth at length the characteristics of cultivation, that is, the contemplation of initial and sustained thought.” 〔T35n1735 0641a16〕 | The pressing of the ten gates belongs to the contemplation at the stage of initial and sustained thought; only from 「如是觀已」 tr. “having examined in this way” onward are the characteristics of contemplation accomplished |
| running through defilement / purely pure | Chengguan: 「十法即為十段。前六通染,是故但約染淨相違,名非梵行,亦不析破彼法自體。後四唯淨,順於梵行故,分析體空何有梵行。」 tr. “The ten dharmas make ten sections. The first six run through defilement, and therefore the argument is made only with respect to the mutual contrariety of the defiled and the pure, so as to name them not brahmacarya; their own substance is not analysed and broken down. The latter four are purely pure, and since they accord with brahmacarya, one analyses their substance as empty — where then would brahmacarya be?” 〔T35n1735 0641a17〕 | The form of refutation at the first six gates and at the latter four is not the same — the first six are settled by the contrariety of the defiled and the pure, the latter four by analysing their substance as empty |
| the contemplation pure in the three spheres | Chengguan, glossing 「於身無所取,於修無所著,於法無所住」 tr. “nothing to be taken in the body, nothing to be clung to in what is cultivated, nothing to be dwelt in among the dharmas” 〔T10n0279 0088c10〕: 「初六句明三輪清淨觀」 tr. “the first six clauses make clear the contemplation pure in the three spheres” 〔T35n1735 0642b08〕 | Not grasping the being who keeps the precepts · not clinging to the practices cultivated · not dwelling in the dharma of the precepts |
| the substance of the non-manifest precepts | Chengguan: 「有說:無作戒體,體即是色。有說:非色非心。」 tr. “Some say: as to the substance of the non-manifest precepts, that substance is form. Some say: it is neither form nor mind.” 〔T35n1735 0642b27〕 | On the pressing by way of the five aggregates in the scripture’s 「為是色,為非色」 tr. “is it form, is it not form” Chengguan judges there to be two purposes, the first with respect to the substance of the precepts, the second with respect to cultivation not being apart from the five aggregates |
| the ninety-eight proclivities / the one hundred and eight afflictions | Chengguan, glossing the eight clauses only of the gate of the Dharma: 「表除九十八使故,加十總觀破百八煩惱故。」 tr. “It symbolizes the removing of the ninety-eight proclivities; and adding the tenth as a general contemplation, it breaks the one hundred and eight afflictions.” 〔T35n1735 0641c15〕 | The commentary brings out two explanations: the one suspects 「應梵本脫漏」 tr. “the Sanskrit text must have dropped something” 〔0641c14〕, the other 「若約有所表者,表除九十八使故,加十總觀破百八煩惱故」 tr. “if it is taken as having something it symbolizes, it symbolizes the removing of the ninety-eight proclivities, and adding the tenth as a general contemplation it breaks the one hundred and eight afflictions” 〔0641c14〕 |
| the ten knowledges beginning with the knowledge of what is possible and impossible | This chapter: 「處非處智、過現未來業報智、諸禪解脫三昧智」 tr. “the knowledge of what is possible and what is impossible, the knowledge of the recompense of deeds past, present, and future, the knowledge of the meditations, liberations, and samādhis” 〔T10n0279 0088c22〕 | That is, the knowledges that are the Tathāgata’s ten powers. Chengguan: 「初深觀果智,即利他之方。」 tr. “The first is deeply contemplating the knowledge that is the fruit, which is the means of benefiting others.” 〔T35n1735 0642c22〕 |
| the objectless four immeasurables | Chengguan: 「後慈念眾生成無緣四等」 tr. “thereafter, kindly mindfulness of living beings accomplishes the objectless four immeasurables” 〔T35n1735 0642c23〕 | The four immeasurable minds of kindness, compassion, gladness, and equanimity in their form that leaves characteristics behind. The scripture’s 「應起大慈悲心,觀察眾生而不捨離」 tr. “he should rouse the mind of great kindness and compassion, examining living beings and not abandoning them” 〔T10n0279 0088c26〕 is that text |
| the arousing of what opens out | Chengguan: 「斯則發者,是開發之發,非發起之發也。」 tr. “This being so, the arousing is the arousing of what opens out, not the arousing of what starts up.” 〔T35n1735 0643a22〕 | In 「初發心」 tr. “the first arousing of the mind”, the word 「發」 tr. “arousing” is glossed as the disclosing of what is already there, not the raising of a new thought |
| not from another awakening | Chengguan: 「不由他悟者,成上慧身,即無師自然智也。」 tr. “‘Not from another awakening’ completes the body of wisdom above; it is the natural wisdom that has no teacher.” 〔T35n1735 0643a29〕 | And he opens it into three senses — 「又不由他悟是自覺也,知一切法是覺他也,成就慧身為覺滿也。」 tr. “Moreover, not from another awakening is awakening oneself; knowing all dharmas is awakening others; and perfecting the body of wisdom is the fullness of awakening.” 〔0643b01〕 |
III. Similes and Rhetoric
(1) The simile of the corpse and the swarm of worms (the last two of the ten faults at the gate of the body · the scripture’s own) — 「則為死屍、則為蟲聚。」 tr. “would be a corpse, would be a swarm of worms.” 〔T10n0279 0088b15〕:
- The vehicle of the simile: a corpse and a swarm of worms.
- What it figures: the body.
- The meaning shown: Chengguan matches these to the ninth and tenth faults, the ninth being 「是身無知,又要當死,究竟不淨故」 tr. “this body is without knowing, and moreover must die, and in the end is impure” 〔T35n1735 0641a27〕, the tenth 「八萬戶蟲,戶有九億,全以蟲聚成其身故。」 tr. “there are eighty thousand households of worms, each household having nine koṭis, and it is wholly as a swarm of worms that they make up the body.” 〔0641a27〕 — since the body is a corpse and a swarm of worms, the body is not a substance of brahmacarya that could serve as a standard.
(2) The five similes: like an illusion, a dream, a shadow, an echo, a conjured thing (the section on the practice of benefiting others · the scripture’s own) — 「了知境界如幻如夢,如影如響,亦如變化。」 tr. “knowing objects to be like an illusion, like a dream, like a shadow, like an echo, and also like something conjured up.” 〔T10n0279 0088c28〕:
- Chengguan glosses both in general and in particular, the particular gloss matching each simile to its sense — 「如幻似有,不實故。」 tr. “Like an illusion: it seems to exist, because it is not real.” 〔T35n1735 0643a03〕; 「如夢者,虛妄見故。如影者,從業緣現故。如響者,屬諸因緣故。如變化者,須臾變滅故。」 tr. “Like a dream: because it is seen falsely. Like a shadow: because it appears from the conditions of deeds. Like an echo: because it belongs to the several causes and conditions. Like something conjured up: because it changes and perishes in an instant.” 〔0643a05〕
- The meaning shown: 「若如是了境,即終日化而無化」 tr. “if one understands objects in this way, then all day long one transforms and yet there is no transforming” 〔0643a07〕, and the four immeasurables become objectless thereby.
- The attaching of the source: Chengguan says 「此中五喻廣如十忍」 tr. “the five similes here are set forth at length as in the Ten Acceptances” 〔T35n1735 0643a02〕, and the Yanyi chao adds 「疏文顯指〈十忍〉、闇用《淨名》」 tr. “the commentary’s text points openly to “The Ten Acceptances” and draws covertly on the Vimalakīrti” 〔T36n1736 0303b07〕.
(3) The simile of the mother cow following her calf (a commentator’s simile · not the scripture’s) — Chengguan, glossing the first of the four clauses on the four immeasurables: 「一雙起慈悲,如犢母隨子」 tr. “first, kindness and compassion are roused together, like a mother cow following her calf” 〔T35n1735 0642c29〕. The meaning shown: that kindness and compassion do not abandon living beings is as a mother cow follows her calf, thought after thought not leaving it.
(4) The simile of the clean mirror and the arising of brightness (a commentator’s simile · not the scripture’s) — Chengguan, glossing 「成就慧身」 tr. “perfecting the body of wisdom”: 「覺心則理現,理現則智圓。若鏡淨明生,非前非後、非新非故,寂照湛然。」 tr. “When the mind awakens, principle appears; when principle appears, wisdom is complete. It is like a mirror being clean and brightness arising: not before and not after, not new and not old, still and illumining and utterly clear.” 〔T35n1735 0643a28〕. The meaning shown: the completing of the body of wisdom is not the newly obtaining of some thing; it is as a mirror’s grime is exhausted and its brightness appears of itself, the brightness not coming from outside.
(5) The similes in the text of this chapter are extremely sparse 〔recorded as absent, as the facts stand〕 — in the whole chapter of little more than nine hundred graphs, the similes the scripture sets up for itself occur in two places only, the last two clauses of the gate of the body and the five similes of the final section; the pressing of the ten gates runs throughout in the form of interrogation and sets up no similes. The other similes met with (the mother cow, the clean mirror and the like) all issue from the commentators and are not the scripture’s; each has been marked as such above.
IV. Collation with Parallel Translations
The Chinese recensions of this chapter: Śikṣānanda T279 (the base text · “The Practice of Brahmacarya, Sixteen”) · Buddhabhadra T278 (the Jin translation, the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka · “The Practice of Brahmacarya, Twelve”, beginning at 〔T09n0278 0449a12〕 and ending before 〔0449c22〕). The chapter titles of the two recensions are wholly the same; they are not a case of differing chapter names. This chapter has no separately circulating scripture and no treatise that lemmatizes and glosses it 〔not found〕. What follows records every clause without adjudicating.
Clause one The question of the deva-son Right Mindfulness
| Recension | Verbatim, rendered | Locus |
|---|---|---|
| Śikṣānanda T279 | The hosts of bodhisattvas of all the worlds have, in accord with the Tathāgata’s teaching, dyed the robe and gone forth from the household. How is purity of brahmacarya to be attained, and from the stations of a bodhisattva the path of unsurpassed awakening reached? | T10n0279 0088b06 |
| Buddhabhadra T278 | Among all the worlds, the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas who are of faith in the household, who are not in the household, and who have gone forth to study the way, having cast off worldly adornments and clothed themselves in the Dharma robe — by what means are those bodhisattvas to cultivate brahmacarya, to be fully endowed with the ground of the way of the bodhisattva’s ten abodes, and swiftly to accomplish the unsurpassed, equal awakening? | T09n0278 0449a13 |
What the variants attach to: (a) As to the mark of going forth, 80 has 「依如來教,染衣出家」 tr. “in accord with the Tathāgata’s teaching, dyed the robe and gone forth from the household” 〔T10n0279 0088b07〕 as a single terse clause, while 60 has 「信家、非家、出家學道,捨離俗飾,被服法衣」 tr. “of faith in the household, not in the household, gone forth to study the way, having cast off worldly adornments and clothed themselves in the Dharma robe” 〔T09n0278 0449a14〕. (b) As to the fruit sought, 80 has 「從菩薩位逮於無上菩提之道」 tr. “from the stations of a bodhisattva to reach the path of unsurpassed awakening” 〔T10n0279 0088b08〕, while 60 expressly marks 「具足菩薩十住道地,速成無上平等菩提」 tr. “to be fully endowed with the ground of the way of the bodhisattva’s ten abodes, and swiftly to accomplish the unsurpassed, equal awakening” 〔T09n0278 0449a16〕 — 60 attaches the position of the ten abodes already within the question. (c) The one who asks and the one asked are wholly the same in both recensions: in both it is the deva-son Right Mindfulness addressing the bodhisattva Dharma Wisdom.
Clause two The general statement of the ten dharmas as objects
| Recension | Verbatim, rendered | Locus |
|---|---|---|
| Śikṣānanda T279 | He should take ten dharmas as his objects, rouse the attention and examine. They are: body, bodily action, speech, verbal action, thought, mental action, the Buddha, the Dharma, the Saṅgha, the precepts. | T10n0279 0088b09 |
| Buddhabhadra T278 | He should first distinguish ten kinds of dharma. What are the ten? They are: body, bodily action, mouth, oral action, thought, mental action, the Buddha, the Dharma, the Saṅgha, the precepts | T09n0278 0449a19 |
What the variants attach to: (a) 80 has 「以十法而為所緣,作意觀察」 tr. “taking ten dharmas as objects, rousing the attention and examining” 〔T10n0279 0088b09〕, 60 has 「分別十種之法」 tr. “distinguishing ten kinds of dharma”. (b) Of the two items of verbal action, 80 has 「語、語業」 tr. “speech, verbal action”, 60 has 「口、口業」 tr. “mouth, oral action”. (c) The names and the order of the ten items are wholly the same in both recensions.
Clause three The ten faults at the gate of the body
| Recension | Verbatim, rendered | Locus |
|---|---|---|
| Śikṣānanda T279 | If the body were brahmacarya, then know that brahmacarya would be non-good, would be contrary to the Dharma, would be turbid, would be foul and stinking, would be impure, would be loathsome, would be repugnant, would be defiled, would be a corpse, would be a swarm of worms. | T10n0279 0088b12 |
| Buddhabhadra T278 | If the body were brahmacarya, then know that brahmacarya would be impure; know that brahmacarya would be contrary to the Dharma; know that brahmacarya would be turbid; know that brahmacarya would be foul and stinking; know that brahmacarya would be filthy; know that brahmacarya would be dust and grime; know that brahmacarya would be fawning and crooked; know that brahmacarya would be eighty thousand households of worms. | T09n0278 0449a21 |
What the variants attach to: 80 lists ten faults, 60 lists eight — 60 lacks the five items 「非善」 tr. “not good”, 「可厭」 tr. “loathsome”, 「違逆」 tr. “repugnant”, 「雜染」 tr. “defiled”, and 「死屍」 tr. “a corpse”; its 「不淨」 tr. “impure” reads 「不清淨」 tr. “not pure”; and it has instead the three items 「穢污」 tr. “filthy”, 「塵垢」 tr. “dust and grime”, and 「諂曲」 tr. “fawning and crooked”. As to the last item, 80 has 「蟲聚」 tr. “a swarm of worms”, 60 has 「八萬戶蟲」 tr. “eighty thousand households of worms”; and Chengguan, glossing the 「蟲聚」 tr. “swarm of worms” of 80, uses precisely the figure of the eighty thousand households: 「八萬戶蟲,戶有九億,全以蟲聚成其身故。」 tr. “there are eighty thousand households of worms, each household having nine koṭis, and it is wholly as a swarm of worms that they make up the body.” 〔T35n1735 0641a27〕
Clause four The ten pressings at the gate of the Buddha
| Recension | Verbatim, rendered | Locus |
|---|---|---|
| Śikṣānanda T279 | Is form the Buddha? Is feeling the Buddha? Is perception the Buddha? Are formations the Buddha? Is consciousness the Buddha? Are the marks the Buddha? Are the signs the Buddha? Are the supernormal powers the Buddha? Are karmic deeds the Buddha? Is the ripened recompense the Buddha? | T10n0279 0088b25 |
| Buddhabhadra T278 | Is form the Buddha? Are feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness the Buddha? Are the thirty-two marks and the eighty minor signs the Buddha? Are all the supernormal powers and the recompense of deeds the Buddha? | T09n0278 0449b07 |
What the variants attach to: 80 opens ten items and presses each one by one, 60 combines them into four questions — feeling, perception, formations, and consciousness in one; the marks and the signs in one; the supernormal powers and the recompense of deeds in one. The two items 「相」 tr. “marks” and 「好」 tr. “signs” of 80 appear in 60 as 「三十二相」 tr. “the thirty-two marks” and 「八十種好」 tr. “the eighty minor signs”.
Clause five The gate of the Saṅgha
| Recension | Verbatim, rendered | Locus |
|---|---|---|
| Śikṣānanda T279 | Is the approach to stream-entry the Saṅgha? Is the fruit of stream-entry the Saṅgha? Is the approach to once-returning the Saṅgha? Is the fruit of once-returning the Saṅgha? Is the approach to non-returning the Saṅgha? Is the fruit of non-returning the Saṅgha? Is the approach to arhatship the Saṅgha? Is the fruit of arhatship the Saṅgha? Are the three clear knowledges the Saṅgha? Are the six superknowledges the Saṅgha? | T10n0279 0088c02 |
| Buddhabhadra T278 | Is heading toward the fruit of the srota-āpanna the Saṅgha? Is obtaining the fruit of the srota-āpanna the Saṅgha? Is heading toward the fruits of the sakṛdāgāmin, the anāgāmin, and the arhat the Saṅgha? Is obtaining the fruits of the sakṛdāgāmin, the anāgāmin, and the arhat the Saṅgha? Are the three clear knowledges and the six superknowledges the Saṅgha? Is liberation that awaits the occasion the Saṅgha? Is liberation that does not await the occasion the Saṅgha? | T09n0278 0449b13 |
What the variants attach to: (a) For the names of the fruits, 80 uses the new renderings of the Xuanzang line, 『stream-enterer, once-returner, non-returner, arhat』, while 60 uses the old transliterations, 『srota-āpanna, sakṛdāgāmin, anāgāmin, arhat』. (b) 60 combines the heading toward and the obtaining of the three fruits of the sakṛdāgāmin, the anāgāmin, and the arhat into one question each. (c) After the three clear knowledges and six superknowledges 60 has the two further items 「時解脫」 tr. “liberation that awaits the occasion” and 「非時解脫」 tr. “liberation that does not await the occasion”, which 80 lacks.
Clause six The gate of the precepts
| Recension | Verbatim, rendered | Locus |
|---|---|---|
| Śikṣānanda T279 | Is the ordination platform the precepts? Is the questioning as to purity the precepts? Is the instruction in deportment the precepts? Is the threefold declaration of the karman the precepts? Is the preceptor the precepts? Is the ācārya the precepts? Is the shaving of the head the precepts? Is the wearing of the kāṣāya robe the precepts? Is begging for food the precepts? Is right livelihood the precepts? | T10n0279 0088c06 |
| Buddhabhadra T278 | Is the precept ground the precepts? Are the ten of the assembly the precepts? Is the questioning as to purity and impurity the precepts? Is the precept master the precepts? Are the threefold karman and the preceptor the precepts? Are the shaving of the head, the Dharma robe, and begging for food the precepts? | T09n0278 0449b17 |
What the variants attach to: (a) 80’s 「壇場」 tr. “ordination platform” ↔ 60’s 「戒場」 tr. “precept ground”. (b) 60 has the item 「十眾」 tr. “the ten of the assembly”, which 80 lacks; 80 has the three items 「教威儀」 tr. “the instruction in deportment”, 「阿闍梨」 tr. “the ācārya”, and 「正命」 tr. “right livelihood”, which 60 lacks. (c) 80 opens ten items, 60 opens six questions.
Clause seven The concluding contemplation · no transit through the three times
| Recension | Verbatim, rendered | Locus |
|---|---|---|
| Śikṣānanda T279 | Having examined in this way, there is nothing to be taken in the body, nothing to be clung to in what is cultivated, nothing to be dwelt in among the dharmas; the past has already ceased, the future has not yet come, the present is empty and still; there is no one who does the deeds, no one who receives the recompense; this world does not move over, that world does not alter. | T10n0279 0088c10 |
| Buddhabhadra T278 | Further, he knows that the past has nowhere it arrives at, that the future has nothing it possesses, that in the present there is no one who acts, no one who knows, no one who receives the recompense, that this world does not arrive at that world, and that world does not arrive at this world. | T09n0278 0449b21 |
What the variants attach to: (a) At the head 80 has the three clauses of the pure three spheres, 「於身無所取,於修無所著,於法無所住」 tr. “nothing to be taken in the body, nothing to be clung to in what is cultivated, nothing to be dwelt in among the dharmas” 〔T10n0279 0088c10〕, which 60 lacks. (b) For the clauses on the three times, 80 has 「過去已滅,未來未至,現在空寂」 tr. “the past has already ceased, the future has not yet come, the present is empty and still” 〔T10n0279 0088c11〕, 60 has 「過去無所至,未來無所有」 tr. “the past has nowhere it arrives at, the future has nothing it possesses” 〔T09n0278 0449b21〕. (c) For the clause on no transit, 80 has 「此世不移動,彼世不改變」 tr. “this world does not move over, that world does not alter” 〔T10n0279 0088c12〕, 60 has 「此世不至彼世,彼世不至此世」 tr. “this world does not arrive at that world, that world does not arrive at this world” 〔T09n0278 0449b23〕.
Clause eight Further cultivating the ten knowledges
| Recension | Verbatim, rendered | Locus |
|---|---|---|
| Śikṣānanda T279 | The knowledge of what is possible and what is impossible, the knowledge of the recompense of deeds past, present, and future, the knowledge of the meditations, liberations, and samādhis, the knowledge of superior and inferior faculties, the knowledge of the various understandings, the knowledge of the various realms, the knowledge of the paths that lead to every destination, the knowledge of the unobstructed divine eye, the knowledge of the unobstructed recollection of former lives, the knowledge that severs the habit-energies forever. | T10n0279 0088c22 |
| Buddhabhadra T278 | The knowledge of what is possible and what is impossible, the knowledge of the recompense of deeds past, future, and present, the knowledge of all the meditations, samādhis, attainments, liberations, and of defilement, purity, and arising, the knowledge of the faculties of living beings, the knowledge that follows their desires and delights, the knowledge of the various natures, the knowledge of the path leading to every place, the knowledge of unobstructed recollection of former lives, the knowledge of the unobstructed divine eye, the knowledge that severs the habit-energies | T09n0278 0449c04 |
What the variants attach to: (a) The order of the eighth and ninth knowledges is the reverse in the two recensions — 80 has 「天眼無礙智、宿命無礙智」 tr. “the knowledge of the unobstructed divine eye, the knowledge of the unobstructed recollection of former lives” 〔T10n0279 0088c24〕, 60 has 「無障礙宿命智,無障礙天眼智」 tr. “the knowledge of unobstructed recollection of former lives, the knowledge of the unobstructed divine eye” 〔T09n0278 0449c07〕. (b) 80’s 「種種解智」 tr. “the knowledge of the various understandings” ↔ 60’s 「隨諸欲樂智」 tr. “the knowledge that follows their desires and delights”; 80’s 「種種界智」 tr. “the knowledge of the various realms” ↔ 60’s 「種種性智」 tr. “the knowledge of the various natures”. (c) 80’s 「永斷習氣智」 tr. “the knowledge that severs the habit-energies forever” ↔ 60’s 「斷習氣智」 tr. “the knowledge that severs the habit-energies”; and at the end 60 has the closing clause 「是為十」 tr. “these are the ten”, which 80 lacks.
Clause nine The five similes
| Recension | Verbatim, rendered | Locus |
|---|---|---|
| Śikṣānanda T279 | Knowing objects to be like an illusion, like a dream, like a shadow, like an echo, and also like something conjured up. | T10n0279 0088c28 |
| Buddhabhadra T278 | Contemplating all dharmas as like an illusion, like a dream, like lightning, like an echo, like something conjured up. | T09n0278 0449c11 |
What the variants attach to: both recensions have five similes, and yet the items differ — 80 has 「如影」 tr. “like a shadow”, 60 has 「如電」 tr. “like lightning”; the remaining four, illusion, dream, echo, and conjured thing, are the same.
Clause ten The answer as to the fruit · the time of the first arousing of the mind
| Recension | Verbatim, rendered | Locus |
|---|---|---|
| Śikṣānanda T279 | At the time of the first arousing of the mind one attains unsurpassed perfect awakening, knows that all dharmas are the very nature of the mind, perfects the body of wisdom, and it is not from another that one awakens. | T10n0279 0089a01 |
| Buddhabhadra T278 | At the time of the first arousing of the mind one thereupon accomplishes right awakening, knows the true and real nature of all dharmas, is fully endowed with the body of wisdom, and it is not from another that one awakens. | T09n0278 0449c14 |
What the variants attach to: (a) For the name of the fruit, 80 has 「即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. “thereupon attains unsurpassed perfect awakening” 〔T10n0279 0089a02〕, 60 has 「便成正覺」 tr. “thereupon accomplishes right awakening”. (b) For what is known, 80 has 「一切法即心自性」 tr. “all dharmas are the very nature of the mind”, 60 has 「一切法真實之性」 tr. “the true and real nature of all dharmas”. (c) For the body of wisdom, 80 has 「成就」 tr. “perfects”, 60 has 「具足」 tr. “is fully endowed with”. (d) The four graphs 「不由他悟」 tr. “not from another that one awakens” are wholly the same in the two recensions. What Fazang glosses is the text of 60: 「標者,初發心時是因、便成正覺是果。」 tr. “As for the heading: the time of the first arousing of the mind is the cause, and thereupon accomplishing right awakening is the fruit.” 〔T35n1733 0202c11〕
All recorded without adjudication: the divergences of the ten clauses above are divergences either of opening out and combining (the ten pressings at the gate of the Buddha against four questions · the ten items at the gate of the precepts against six questions), or of the number of items (the ten faults at the gate of the body against eight · the two items of liberation awaiting the occasion at the gate of the Saṅgha · shadow against lightning among the five similes), or of rendering (speech and mouth · stream-enterer and srota-āpanna · the very nature of the mind and the true and real nature), or of order (the two knowledges of the divine eye and of former lives); both recensions are recorded together, and no judgment is passed as to which is superior.
V. Scriptural Grounds of Sectarian Doctrine (the doctrinal eye)
(1) At the time of the first arousing of the mind one attains unsurpassed perfect awakening — the eye-sentence of this chapter, present in the scripture itself: 「若諸菩薩能與如是觀行相應,於諸法中不生二解,一切佛法疾得現前,初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. “if bodhisattvas are able to accord with contemplative practice such as this and give rise to no two views among the dharmas, all the Buddha’s dharmas will swiftly come present, and at the time of the first arousing of the mind they attain unsurpassed perfect awakening” 〔T10n0279 0088c29〕. Chengguan first glosses the time of the word 「疾」 tr. “swiftly”:
「上言疾得,疾在何時?故云初發心時。何法現前?謂無上菩提也。」 tr. “Above it said swiftly attain; when is the swiftness? Therefore it says, at the time of the first arousing of the mind. What dharma comes present? Unsurpassed awakening.” 〔T35n1735 0643a16〕
Next he glosses the reason for it:
「夫初心為始、正覺為終,何以初心便成正覺?故今釋云:知一切法即心自性故,覺法自性即名為佛。」 tr. “Now, the first mind is the beginning and right awakening the end; how is it that with the first mind one thereupon accomplishes right awakening? Therefore the present gloss says: because one knows that all dharmas are the very nature of the mind, and to awaken to the self-nature of dharmas is precisely what is named a Buddha.” 〔T35n1735 0643a18〕
And he cites another place in this same sūtra as attestation: 「故下經云「佛心豈有他,正覺覺世間。」斯良證也。」 tr. “Therefore a later passage of the sūtra says, ‘How should the Buddha-mind be anything other? Right awakening awakens the world.’ This is a good attestation.” 〔T35n1735 0643a20〕; and further he fixes the gloss of the word 「發」 tr. “arousing”: 「斯則發者,是開發之發,非發起之發也。」 tr. “This being so, the arousing is the arousing of what opens out, not the arousing of what starts up.” 〔0643a22〕
Fazang, glossing the same sentence on the sixty-fascicle text, attaches it to the perfect interfusion of cause and effect in the practice-position of Samantabhadra:
「此明行滿入位時,即得普賢位故,一位即一切位,乃至佛果無不圓備,故云正覺。」 tr. “This makes clear that at the time when practice is fulfilled and one enters the position, one attains the position of Samantabhadra, so that one position is all positions, and up to the fruit of buddhahood there is nothing not perfectly complete; therefore it says right awakening.” 〔T35n1733 0202c15〕
「此一乘普賢行位,因果圓融相即無礙故致然也」 tr. “This practice-position of Samantabhadra in the One Vehicle is brought about because cause and effect are perfectly interfused, identical with one another and unobstructed” 〔T35n1733 0202c19〕
And he cites a scriptural attestation: 「初發心菩薩即是佛故,悉與三世諸如來等。」 tr. “Because a bodhisattva of the first arousing of the mind is precisely a Buddha, he is in all respects equal to the Tathāgatas of the three times.” 〔0202c14〕. Li Tongxuan, for his part, brings it home to the perishing of views and the appearing of wisdom: 「是知見亡智應,名初發心時便成正覺,成就慧身不由他悟。」 tr. “Know then that when views perish and wisdom responds, this is named accomplishing right awakening at the time of the first arousing of the mind, perfecting the body of wisdom and not from another awakening.” 〔T36n1739 0836a05〕
(2) Knowing that all dharmas are the very nature of the mind — Chengguan glosses this clause as the characteristic of what comes present, and it is also the source of the reason for the foregoing:
「既言知一切法即心自性,則知此心即一切法性。今理現自心,即心之性已備無邊之德矣。」 tr. “Since it says that one knows all dharmas to be the very nature of the mind, then one knows that this mind is the nature of all dharmas. Now that principle appears in one’s own mind, the nature of that mind is already furnished with measureless qualities.” 〔T35n1735 0643a24〕
(3) Why the dharmas are just ten — Chengguan answers the question 「何要觀耶」 tr. “why is there any need to contemplate?” and establishes two senses: the first is to make up a round number, the second that 「梵行緣體不離此十」 tr. “the conditions and the substance of brahmacarya are not apart from these ten” 〔T35n1735 0641a08〕 — the three actions being the places on which practice depends, the three actions the causes of practice, the three jewels the conditions of practice, and the precepts the substance of practice. The form of the contemplation is this:
「意云:十中隨一,若是餘九,即非明假眾緣以顯無性。況十中各十,一一推徵相盡理現,名真梵行。」 tr. “The sense is: take any one of the ten — if it were so, the other nine would not be; this makes clear that by borrowing many conditions their want of self-nature is displayed. How much more when within each of the ten there are ten again: pressing each one by one until characteristics are exhausted and principle appears is what is named true brahmacarya.” 〔T35n1735 0641a14〕
(4) The two forms of refutation, the first six running through defilement and the latter four purely pure —
「十法即為十段。前六通染,是故但約染淨相違,名非梵行,亦不析破彼法自體。後四唯淨,順於梵行故,分析體空何有梵行。」 tr. “The ten dharmas make ten sections. The first six run through defilement, and therefore the argument is made only with respect to the mutual contrariety of the defiled and the pure, so as to name them not brahmacarya; their own substance is not analysed and broken down. The latter four are purely pure, and since they accord with brahmacarya, one analyses their substance as empty — where then would brahmacarya be?” 〔T35n1735 0641a17〕
This determines how the ten gates of the whole chapter are read: the six gates from body to mental action are settled by the contrariety of the defiled and the pure, while the four gates of the Buddha, the Dharma, the Saṅgha, and the precepts require the analysing of their substance as empty.
(5) The three senses of the substance of brahmacarya, each in two — Chengguan brings out the substance:
「梵行以何為體?體略有三:一者即戒,戒能防非故得稱梵;二者四等;三者是慧。」 tr. “What is taken as the substance of brahmacarya? In brief the substance has three senses: first, it is the precepts, since the precepts can guard against wrong and so may be called brahma; second, the four immeasurables; third, wisdom.” 〔T35n1735 0640b26〕
「上三中二義,各初義通凡小、後義唯大乘,此二不二為實教梵行。若一行具一切佛法,方是華嚴之梵行也。」 tr. “Of the two senses within each of the three above, the first sense in each runs through the ordinary person and the lesser vehicle, while the latter sense is solely of the great vehicle; and these two being not two is the brahmacarya of the real teaching. Only when one practice is fully endowed with all the Buddha’s dharmas is it the brahmacarya of the Huayan.” 〔T35n1735 0640c09〕
Of the two senses of the precepts, following characteristics is 「依如來教,染衣出家乞食正命」 tr. “in accord with the Tathāgata’s teaching, dyeing the robe and going forth, begging for food and right livelihood” 〔0640c02〕, and leaving characteristics is 「於修無所著則戒相如虛空」 tr. “nothing being clung to in what is cultivated, the characteristics of the precepts are like empty space” 〔0640c03〕; the two of the four immeasurables are having an object and being objectless, the objectless being 「了知境界如幻如夢」 tr. “knowing objects to be like an illusion, like a dream” 〔T10n0279 0088c28〕; the two of wisdom are having discrimination, which is 「於十法一一推徵」 tr. “pressing each of the ten dharmas one by one”, and being without discrimination, which is 「觀無相法,了知平等離念契玄」 tr. “contemplating the markless dharma, knowing equality, leaving thought behind and according with the profound” 〔0640c08〕.
(6) The wisdom that contemplates is solely that of the great vehicle of the real teaching — although the objects contemplated run through both the great and the lesser, the wisdom that contemplates does not:
「此上十境,正約菩薩,傍兼聲聞,設依小受修觀則為菩薩」 tr. “The ten objects above are stated properly with respect to the bodhisattva and take in the śrāvaka besides; and if one who has received according to the lesser cultivates this contemplation, he becomes a bodhisattva” 〔T35n1735 0642a28〕
「故所觀境通於大小,其能觀智唯實教大乘。」 tr. “Therefore the objects contemplated run through both great and lesser, but the wisdom that contemplates is solely that of the great vehicle of the real teaching.” 〔T35n1735 0642b01〕
(7) The boundary between purifying practice and brahma practice — Chengguan: 「然前信中之淨,隨事造修悲智兼導,至此純熟,了心自性悲智無二,故小有不同。」 tr. “Yet the purity within the earlier faiths was a cultivation in accordance with particular matters, compassion and wisdom leading together; here it has ripened, and one understands the self-nature of the mind and that compassion and wisdom are not two — hence there is a slight difference.” 〔T35n1735 0640c15〕; Fazang establishes six distinctions, of which the fifth carries this same sense: 「五約二行,隨事造修施戒等為淨行,離念契玄為梵行」 tr. “fifth, with respect to the two practices: to cultivate giving and the precepts and the rest in accordance with particular matters is pure practice; to leave thought behind and accord with the profound is brahma practice” 〔T35n1733 0201b03〕.
VI. Divergent Interpretations of the Commentators (the ancient worthies · with their tenets marked)
Chengguan, Huayan jing shu T35n1735 · Yanyi chao T36n1736 (glossing the eighty-fascicle text clause by clause · principal)
Three accounts of the name stand together — besides the appositional compound, Chengguan records two dependent compounds: 「亦有云:真境為梵,智契為行。或涅槃為梵,修因為行。此二依主釋。」 tr. “There are also those who say: the true object is brahma, and wisdom’s according with it is the practice. Or: nirvāṇa is brahma, and cultivating the cause is the practice. These two are dependent compounds.” 〔T35n1735 0640b25〕
Two explanations of the eight clauses only at the gate of the Dharma — among the ten gates only the gate of the Dharma lists eight items, and Chengguan sets out two explanations without settling on one:
「第八觀法。但有八句者,應梵本脫漏,豈餘九皆十,此獨八耶?若約有所表者,表除九十八使故,加十總觀破百八煩惱故。」 tr. “Eighth, contemplating the Dharma. That there are only eight clauses must be a dropping out in the Sanskrit text — how should the other nine all be ten and this one alone be eight? But if it is taken as having something it symbolizes, it symbolizes the removing of the ninety-eight proclivities, and adding the tenth as a general contemplation it breaks the one hundred and eight afflictions.” 〔T35n1735 0641c13〕
The former explanation suspects a dropping out in the Sanskrit text, the latter takes the eight as symbolizing the removing of the ninety-eight in number; the two explanations stand side by side.
Two judgments of the three bodies at the gate of the Buddha — Chengguan glosses the ten items of the gate of the Buddha as contemplating the three bodies, and the matchings of the lesser vehicle and of the great differ:
「若依小乘,初五法身,以無漏戒等及眷屬無漏五蘊為法身故。次二報身,以三祇百劫所修感相好故。次一化身,神通化現故。」 tr. “If one follows the lesser vehicle, the first five are the dharma-body, since the undefiled precepts and the rest, together with the undefiled five aggregates that attend them, are the dharma-body. The next two are the reward body, since what is cultivated through three incalculable ages and a hundred kalpas brings about the marks and signs. The next one is the emanation body, since it is a manifestation of the supernormal powers.” 〔T35n1735 0641b29〕
「若依大乘,前八皆是化身,後一報身。」 tr. “If one follows the great vehicle, the first eight are all the emanation body, and the last one is the reward body.” 〔T35n1735 0641c04〕
For the refutation he cites the Zhong lun: 「非陰不離陰,此彼不相在。如來不有陰,何處有如來。」 tr. “Not the aggregates, not apart from the aggregates; this and that are not in one another. The Tathāgata does not possess the aggregates; where then is there a Tathāgata?” 〔T35n1735 0641c08〕, and concludes 「是知真佛既超心境,依斯成行,行豈相耶?」 tr. “Know then that since the true Buddha transcends mind and object, how could a practice accomplished on this basis be a matter of characteristics?” 〔0641c12〕.
A self-imposed limit as to detail at the gate of the Saṅgha — having listed the measure of afflictions cut off at the four approaches and four fruits, Chengguan stops his own expansion: 「今此欲明梵行,粗陳名目,若廣引《婆沙》、《俱舍》、《雜集》、《瑜伽》則清淨梵行有累名數,力有餘者付在說時。」 tr. “What is wanted here is to make brahmacarya clear, so the names are set out roughly; were one to cite the Vibhāṣā, the Kośa, the Zaji lun, and the Yogācārabhūmi at length, then pure brahmacarya would be encumbered with names and numbers — those whose strength suffices may attend to it at the time of exposition.” 〔T35n1735 0642a10〕
Two accounts of the substance of the non-manifest precepts at the gate of the precepts — 「有說:無作戒體,體即是色。有說:非色非心。」 tr. “Some say: as to the substance of the non-manifest precepts, that substance is form. Some say: it is neither form nor mind.” 〔T35n1735 0642b27〕; and Chengguan, on the strength of the scripture’s double negation 「為是色,為非色」 tr. “is it form, is it not form”, displays the middle, taking neither of the two accounts as a fixed hold.
What the Yanyi chao supplies — at the contemplation of emptiness the subcommentary marks off: 「以前觀空非斷滅故。」 tr. “Because the contemplation of emptiness above is not annihilation.” 〔T36n1736 0303b04〕; on the four graphs 「不由他悟」 tr. “not from another awakening” it judges three senses to be contained, 「謂見夫心性,性外皆他,自亦不存,兼顯以心為自、心外為他。」 tr. “that is, consider the nature of mind: whatever is outside that nature is other, and the self too does not remain; and it displays besides that mind is taken as self and what is outside mind as other.” 〔0303b10〕; and it attaches this sense to the preceding chapter: 「前〈十住品〉從麁至細,今此以細況麁耳。」 tr. “The preceding “Ten Abodes” went from the coarse to the fine; here the fine is used to compare with the coarse, that is all.” 〔0303b13〕
Fazang, Tanxuan ji T35n1733 (commentary on the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka, “The Practice of Brahmacarya, Twelve”)
Three accounts of the name — 「初釋名者,離妄念之染故云梵,會無我理故云行,此行即梵。」 tr. “First, explaining the name: because it leaves the defilement of false thought it is called brahma; because it comprehends the principle of no-self it is called practice; and this practice is brahma.” 〔T35n1733 0201a24〕; next, 「二離染中極名梵,即真境也;智能證此,故云行。」 tr. “Second, the utmost in leaving defilement is named brahma, that is, the true object; and wisdom is able to realize this, and therefore it is called practice.” 〔0201a25〕; third, 「三涅槃果為梵,以寂靜故;修因為行。」 tr. “Third, the fruit of nirvāṇa is brahma, because it is still and quiet; and cultivating the cause is the practice.” 〔0201a26〕
Six distinctions between the pure and the brahma — 「有六別:一約報,欲天為淨,色天為梵。二約人,在家戒是淨,出家戒為梵。三行位,信中修為淨行,入位已去修為梵行。」 tr. “There are six distinctions. First, with respect to recompense: the desire heavens are the pure, the form heavens the brahma. Second, with respect to persons: the precepts of one in the household are the pure, the precepts of one gone forth the brahma. Third, the position in practice: what is cultivated within the faiths is pure practice, and what is cultivated from entering the positions onward is brahma practice.” 〔T35n1733 0201a28〕; fourth, with respect to the two benefits, 「三學自利為淨行,四等利他為梵行」 tr. “the three trainings that benefit oneself are pure practice, the four immeasurables that benefit others are brahma practice” 〔0201b02〕; fifth, with respect to the two practices; sixth, with respect to cause and effect, 「涅槃為淨,道諦行為梵」 tr. “nirvāṇa is the pure, and the practice that is the truth of the path is the brahma” 〔0201b05〕.
Two rounds in the section on the fruit displaying that a small cause obtains a great fruit — 「起後中兩重,顯少因得大果。」 tr. “In what raises what follows there are two rounds, displaying that a small cause obtains a great fruit.” 〔T35n1733 0202c07〕; the first round takes the small expedient as cause and the swift attaining as fruit, and the second round has 「標者,初發心時是因、便成正覺是果。」 tr. “As for the heading: the time of the first arousing of the mind is the cause, and thereupon accomplishing right awakening is the fruit.” 〔0202c11〕, with the gloss 「今釋:發心時即得故。」 tr. “The present gloss: because at the time of arousing the mind it is thereupon attained.” 〔0202c13〕
Li Tongxuan, Xin Huayan jing lun T36n1739 (a different track, by symbolic import)
Explaining the chapter’s title by establishing the sense on the unobtainability of the substance of practice — 「梵者,此云淨也。以其淨行利眾生故,常居世間行一切行化利眾生,無行可得則無行不淨,是故名為梵行也。」 tr. “Brahma means here the pure. Because by pure practice he benefits living beings, he constantly dwells in the world, performs all practices, and transforms and benefits living beings; and since no practice can be obtained, there is no practice that is not pure — therefore it is named brahmacarya.” 〔T36n1739 0835b21〕
The symbolic import of the two masters of the question and the answer — 「無念之念名為正念,隨行無念名為正念。」 tr. “The mindfulness that is the mindfulness of no-thought is named Right Mindfulness; the no-thought that accompanies practice is named Right Mindfulness.” 〔T36n1739 0835b24〕; 「隨行無念名之為法,以法簡情名之為慧。起情乖理名無法慧,達理情亡名為法慧。」 tr. “The no-thought that accompanies practice is named Dharma; the selecting of sentiment by means of the Dharma is named wisdom. To rouse sentiment and go against principle is named being without Dharma Wisdom; to penetrate principle and let sentiment perish is named Dharma Wisdom.” 〔0835b27〕
A different name for the chapter — Li Tongxuan repeatedly calls this chapter “Pure Conduct” in his treatise: 「今約能問之主、所說法人及所說法,總名〈淨行品〉者,均分理教義。」 tr. “Now, taking together the master who is able to ask, the person who expounds the Dharma, and the Dharma expounded, the whole is named “Pure Conduct”, apportioning evenly the senses of principle and of teaching.” 〔T36n1739 0835b29〕; and again, 「此〈淨行品〉成十住中初發心之佛果」 tr. “This “Pure Conduct” accomplishes the fruit of buddhahood of the first arousing of the mind within the ten abodes” 〔0836a12〕. And he divides purifying practice by position into two: 「如一百四十願名淨行者,十信位願中以成世間,知見萬法以為淨行。此十住位中以行體無為,名為淨行。」 tr. “As for the one hundred and forty vows being named purifying practice: within the vows of the position of the ten faiths, it is by accomplishing the world and knowing and seeing the myriad dharmas that purifying practice is constituted. Here within the position of the ten abodes it is because the substance of practice is unconditioned that it is named purifying practice.” 〔0836a09〕
The successive turning of the purities — 「諸行淨即智慧淨,智慧淨故其心淨,心淨即諸法淨,諸法淨故名法界淨,法界淨即其眾生淨,眾生淨即佛國土淨。」 tr. “The several practices being pure, wisdom is pure; because wisdom is pure, the mind is pure; the mind being pure, all dharmas are pure; because all dharmas are pure, it is named the Dharma realm being pure; the Dharma realm being pure, living beings are pure; living beings being pure, the buddha-lands are pure.” 〔T36n1739 0836a15〕
Recorded without adjudication
Chengguan explicates the text clause by clause under four gates, brings out the three senses of the substance of brahmacarya — the precepts, the four immeasurables, and wisdom — each divided into two layers, judges that the first six run through defilement and the latter four are purely pure, and fixes 「發」 tr. “arousing” as the arousing of what opens out; Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, explains the name in three accounts, establishes six distinctions between the pure and the brahma, judges the section on the fruit as two rounds displaying that a small cause obtains a great fruit, and brings it home to the perfect interfusion of cause and effect in the practice-position of Samantabhadra; Li Tongxuan reads it by symbolic import, establishing the sense of no-thought with respect to the master able to ask and the person able to expound, calls this chapter by the name “Pure Conduct” in his treatise, and further divides the purifying practice of the position of the ten faiths and that of the position of the ten abodes into two. The three houses proceed side by side, and all are established accounts of the ancient worthies. On the eight clauses only at the gate of the Dharma, Chengguan brings out the two explanations of a dropping out in the Sanskrit text and of symbolizing the breaking of the one hundred and eight afflictions; on the substance of the non-manifest precepts, there are of old the two accounts of its being form and of its being neither form nor mind; in both these places Chengguan himself records two accounts without settling on one, and their own wording is recorded here without any further appraisal being added. 60 has 「便成正覺」 tr. “thereupon accomplishes right awakening” and 80 has 「即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. “thereupon attains unsurpassed perfect awakening” 〔T10n0279 0089a02〕; both recensions are recorded together. All of this is recorded, and no judgment is passed as to high or low.
VII. Cross-Reading and Lineage
- The attachment to the chapters before and after: this chapter carries on from “The Ten Abodes, Fifteen” and is followed by “The Merit of the First Arousing of the Mind, Seventeen”. Chengguan attaches it thus: 「五為顯入住之因,謂自他二種梵行淨故,則入初住也」 tr. “fifth, it is to display the cause of entering the abodes: that is, because the two kinds of brahmacarya, one’s own and others’, are pure, one enters the first abode” 〔T35n1735 0640b18〕; Li Tongxuan attaches it thus: 「前品明住佛無所住之門故,還行無行之行,是故此品須來。」 tr. “Because the preceding chapter made clear the gate of abiding in the Buddha’s non-abiding, one turns back and practises the practice of no practice; therefore this chapter must come.” 〔T36n1739 0835c03〕. The following chapter is devoted to the merit of the first arousing of the mind, and joins directly with the closing sentence of this chapter, 「初發心時即得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. “at the time of the first arousing of the mind one attains unsurpassed perfect awakening” 〔T10n0279 0089a01〕.
- The attachment to “Pure Conduct”: the name of this chapter is established over against “Pure Conduct” of the second assembly, and Chengguan’s 「揀上淨行立梵行名」 tr. “marking it off from the purifying practice above, the name brahmacarya is established” 〔T35n1735 0640b23〕 refers to just this; Fazang’s six distinctions and Li Tongxuan’s division of purifying practice into two positions (the purifying practice of the one hundred and forty vows in the position of the ten faiths as against the unconditioned substance of practice in the position of the ten abodes 〔T36n1739 0836a09〕) are alike the unfolding of this one attachment.
- The attachment to “The Ten Abodes”: the Yanyi chao judges the sixth reason for this chapter’s coming to be a general explanation of the heading clause at the end of each position of the preceding Ten Abodes chapter 〔T36n1736 0296c11〕, and again at 「不由他悟」 tr. “not from another awakening” 〔T36n1736 0303b10〕 it says 「前〈十住品〉從麁至細,今此以細況麁耳。」 tr. “The preceding “Ten Abodes” went from the coarse to the fine; here the fine is used to compare with the coarse, that is all.” 〔0303b13〕.
- The attachment to “The Ten Acceptances”: for the setting forth at length of the five similes, Chengguan points to 「此中五喻廣如十忍」 tr. “the five similes here are set forth at length as in the Ten Acceptances” 〔T35n1735 0643a02〕.
- What the treatises of the Huayan school carry on: Zhiyan, in the Huayan jing neizhangmen deng za kongmu zhang T45n1870, sets up as a chapter heading 「梵行品初明通觀章」 tr. “the chapter on the general contemplation first set forth in the Brahmacarya chapter” 〔T45n1870 0548a20〕, and the same chapter title recurs at 〔0550a24〕; and again, in the place where the chapters are listed by their order, he writes 「十菩薩說住品第十九 梵行品第二十」 tr. “The Chapter in which Ten Bodhisattvas Expound the Abodes, Nineteen; The Brahmacarya Chapter, Twenty” 〔0588b11〕 — this is the numbering of chapters internal to the Kongmu zhang itself and not the chapter number of the present chapter; recorded as such. Gyeondeung of Silla, in the Huayan yisheng chengfo miaoyi T45n1890, cites the text of the five similes of this chapter to prove that one practice is all practices: 「如響如化等故。一行即一切行等。故梵行品」 tr. “because it is like an echo, like something conjured, and so forth; one practice is all practices, and so forth; therefore the Brahmacarya chapter” 〔T45n1890 0777b24〕.
- 〔not found〕: in the Huayan yisheng jiaoyi fenqi zhang T45n1866 · the Shixuan men T45n1868 · the Fajie xuanjing T45n1883 · the Huanyuan guan T45n1876, these four books, 「梵行品」 tr. “the Brahmacarya chapter” yields zero hits; the absence is recorded. This chapter has no separately circulating treatise that lemmatizes and glosses it (unlike “The Ten Grounds”, which has the Shidi jing lun); the absence is recorded.
- 〔not recorded〕: the separate matching of the phrase 「初發心」 tr. “the first arousing of the mind” between “The Ten Grounds” and the treatises of the consciousness-only lineage that carry it on falls outside the range covered here; this is not a case of zero hits, and the absence is recorded as the facts stand.
VIII. Edition Location Register
- Śikṣānanda T279 (the base text): “The Practice of Brahmacarya, Sixteen”, beginning at 〔T10n0279 0088b05〕 (the line of the chapter title) and ending before the chapter title of the following chapter, “The Merit of the First Arousing of the Mind, Seventeen〕, at 〔0089a04〕. The question 0088b06 · the general statement of the ten dharmas 0088b09 · the gate of the body 0088b12 · the gate of bodily action 0088b15 · the gate of speech 0088b17 · the gate of verbal action 0088b18 · the gate of thought 0088b20 · the gate of mental action 0088b23 · the gate of the Buddha 0088b24 · the gate of the Dharma 0088b28 · the gate of the Saṅgha 0088c02 · the gate of the precepts 0088c06 · the concluding contemplation of the three spheres 0088c10 · the eleven clauses pressing the substance 0088c13 · the conclusion as to pure brahmacarya 0088c17 · further cultivating the ten knowledges 0088c21 · the ten powers and inquiring 0088c25 · rousing compassion and the five similes 0088c26 · the answer as to the fruit, the first arousing of the mind 0089a01 · not from another awakening 0089a02. In the whole chapter there are nine hundred and seventeen graphs, and one thousand one hundred and fourteen non-blank characters including punctuation (method of counting: setting aside the chapter-title line and the page-number lines, an actual count over the four lines of body text in this unit’s source-text layer).
- Buddhabhadra T278 (the Jin translation, the principal parallel collated): ⟨The Practice of Brahmacarya, Twelve”, beginning at 〔T09n0278 0449a12〕 and ending before the chapter title of the following chapter, “The Merit of the Bodhisattva of the First Arousing of the Mind, Thirteen”, at 〔0449c22〕. The question 0449a13 · the general statement of the ten dharmas 0449a19 · the gate of the body 0449a21 · the gate of bodily action 0449a26 · the gate of the mouth 0449a28 · the gate of oral action 0449b02 · the gate of thought 0449b03 · the gate of mental action 0449b05 · the gate of the Buddha 0449b07 · the gate of the Dharma 0449b09 · the gate of the Saṅgha 0449b12 · the gate of the precepts 0449b17 · the concluding contemplation 0449b21 · the pressing of the substance 0449b23 · the conclusion as to pure brahmacarya 0449c02 · further cultivating the ten knowledges 0449c03 · the ten powers, examining and rousing compassion 0449c08 · the five similes 0449c11 · the answer as to the fruit 0449c14. Fascicle boundaries: fascicle eight ends 0449c16 · fascicle nine begins 0449c19.
- Chengguan, the Shu T35n1735: the commentary on the Brahmacarya chapter begins 0640b14 (the six senses of its coming 0640b15 · the explanation of the name 0640b22 · bringing out the three senses of the substance 0640b26 · each of the three senses in two 0640c01 · the tenet and aim 0640c17 · the explanation of the text divided in two 0640c18 · the two persons of the question and the answer 0640c19 · the question having two aspects 0640c24 · the answer divided in two 0640c27 · one’s own practice divided in four 0641a03 · why the dharmas are ten 0641a08 · setting forth at length the characteristics of cultivation 0641a16 · the ten sections and the two forms, defiled and pure 0641a17 · the ten faults at the gate of the body 0641a21 · the gate of bodily action 0641b03 · the gate of speech 0641b05 · the gate of verbal action 0641b08 · the gate of thought 0641b10 · the gate of mental action 0641b21 · the three bodies at the gate of the Buddha 0641b28 · the citation of the Zhong lun 0641c08 · the two explanations of the eight clauses at the gate of the Dharma 0641c13 · the gate of the Saṅgha 0641c25 · the four approaches and four fruits 0642a03 · the gate of the precepts 0642a18 · the characteristics of contemplation accomplished 0642b03 · purity in the three spheres 0642b08 · the gloss on no transit 0642b16 · the eleven clauses pressing the substance 0642b19 · the two purposes of the five aggregates 0642b26 · the conclusion as to purity 0642c10 · the citation of the great perfection of wisdom 0642c17 · the purity of the practice of benefiting others 0642c21 · the four clauses of the objectless four immeasurables 0642c29 · the particular gloss on the five similes 0643a03 · the answer as to the fruit 0643a09 · when is the swiftness 0643a16 · why the first mind accomplishes right awakening 0643a18 · the citation of a later passage of the sūtra 0643a21 · the arousing of what opens out 0643a22 · the characteristic of what comes present 0643a23 · perfecting the body of wisdom 0643a26 · the three senses of not from another awakening 0643a29 · 「梵行品竟」 tr. “the Brahmacarya chapter is finished” 0643b06) – ending before 0643b08.
- Chengguan, the Chao T36n1736: the subcommentary on the Brahmacarya chapter begins 0296b24 (the six senses of its coming glossed one by one 0296b24 · cultivated in common throughout the ten abodes 0296b29 · following characteristics set against the real characteristic 0296c03 · cause set against effect 0296c07 · the heading set against the explanation 0296c11 · the explanation of the name in four divisions 0296c15) – ending before 0303b15 (the contemplation of emptiness is not annihilation 0303b04 · the five similes pointing to the Ten Acceptances and drawing on the Vimalakīrti 0303b06 · the three senses of not from another awakening 0303b10 · comparison with the preceding Ten Abodes chapter 0303b13).
- Fazang, the Tanxuan ji T35n1733: “The Practice of Brahmacarya, Twelve” begins 0201a23 (the three accounts of the name 0201a24 · the six distinctions between the pure and the brahma 0201a27 · the five senses of its coming 0201b06 · the tenet and aim 0201b12) · the two rounds in the section on the fruit 0202c07 · the time of the first arousing of the mind is the cause 0202c11 · the citation of a scriptural attestation 0202c14 · one position is all positions 0202c15 · the perfect interfusion of cause and effect 0202c19 – ending before 0202c22.
- Li Tongxuan, the Lun T36n1739: the Brahmacarya chapter begins 0835b18 (analysis under three gates 0835b19 · explaining the chapter’s title 0835b21 · the symbolic import of Right Mindfulness 0835b24 · the symbolic import of Dharma Wisdom 0835b27 · calling it the Pure Conduct chapter 0835b29 · explaining the reason for the chapter’s coming 0835c03 · outlining the text in seven gates 0835c07 · the line counts of the several gates 0835c08–0835c15 · wisdom appearing, the one substance not far off 0835c23 · views perishing and wisdom responding, at the first arousing of the mind one thereupon accomplishes right awakening 0836a05 · the purifying practice of two positions 0836a09 · the successive turning of the purities 0836a15) – ending before 0836a19.
- The treatises of the Huayan school: Zhiyan, the Kongmu zhang T45n1870 (0548a20 · 0550a24, the chapter title · 0588b11, the chapters listed by their order) · Gyeondeung, the Huayan yisheng chengfo miaoyi T45n1890 (0777b24, citing the text of the five similes) — all of these are listings by name or citations as attestation; recorded without adjudication.
- Variant readings: within the range of T279 covered by this unit, 〔0088b05〕–〔0089a03〕, the Taishō base text carries 4 collation notes, recorded one by one without adjudication (base reading 【大】|variant readings of other witnesses, several witnesses separated by /): 〔0088b19〕諭【大】|喻【宮】 · 〔0088b28〕耶【大】|耶不隨順是法……得是法耶(凡13字)【明】 · 〔0088c08〕和尚【大】|和上【聖】 · 〔0088c08〕鬀【大】|剃【宮】. The interlinear notes (phonetic and collation glosses) were stripped and recorded at the level of the original-text layer; the original-text layer carries no
□lacuna marks. - A further note upon the variant readings: 1 CBETA emendation (not counted among the Taishō collation notes listed above): 〔0088b17〕唇【CB】|胸【大】/唇【明】【宮】.