華嚴經 品三十七 如來出現品 · 出現之行Avataṃsaka Sūtra · The Appearance of the Tathāgata · The Practice of the Appearance

〔T10 0274b17〕
心要Essence

澄觀說:終日行,而未曾行。

前一義說佛的境界有多大,這一義問:那麼佛在做什麼。普賢立了兩個名——無礙行、真如行。澄觀一句話拆開:一個是理裡見的事,一個是事裡見的理;『融而無礙』,才叫如來行。

然後他一路把「量」拆掉。不是有量——你順口要接『所以是無量』,他先堵住:「若謂無量,即是量故。」

五個譬喻,兩種姿態。金翅鳥王兩翅一鼓,愛海分開,把善根已熟的人撮出來——這是勇猛的那一面。日月獨行虛空,照了一整天,不曾起一個「我從何來」的念——這是無思的那一面。澄觀說:前者喻即智之悲,後者喻悲不失智。

作而無念,是這一義留給讀者的功課。你利益人時心裡若還記著自己在利益人,那一段記著,經文叫它戲論。

Chengguan says: practicing all day long, and yet never having practiced.

The sense before this one told how vast the Buddha’s realm is; this sense asks: then what is the Buddha doing? Samantabhadra sets up two names — the unobstructed practice, the practice of suchness. Chengguan takes them apart in a single line: one is phenomena seen within principle, the other is principle seen within phenomena; only their ‘fusing without obstruction’ is called the practice of the Tathāgata.

Then, step by step, he dismantles “measure.” It is not measured — and just as you are about to add, offhandedly, ‘so it is measureless,’ he blocks the way first: “For if one calls it measureless, that is precisely a measure.”

Five similes, two postures. The king of the golden-winged birds gives one beat of his two wings, the sea of craving parts, and he seizes out the people whose roots of goodness have ripened — that is the valiant side. The sun and moon travel space alone and shine a whole day long without once raising the thought “where have I come from” — that is the thoughtless side. Chengguan says: the former figures the compassion that is identical with wisdom, the latter the compassion that does not lose wisdom.

To act and yet be without thought about it is the exercise this sense leaves for the reader. When you benefit someone, if the mind still keeps in it that you are benefiting him, that stretch of keeping-in-mind is what the sūtra calls frivolous talk.

原典Canonical · verbatim

〔T10 0274〕 「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺行?佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應知無礙行是如來行,應知真如行是如來行。佛子!如真如,前際不生,後際不動,現在不起;如來行亦如是,不生、不動、不起。佛子!如法界,非量、非無量,無形故;如來行亦如是,非量、非無量,無形故。佛子!譬如鳥飛虛空,經於百年,已經過處、未經過處皆不可量。何以故?虛空界無邊際故。如來行亦如是,假使有人經百千億那由他劫分別演說,已說、未說皆不可量。何以故?如來行無邊際故。佛子!如來、應、正等覺住無礙行,無有住處,而能普為一切眾生示現所行,令其見已,出過一切諸障礙道。佛子!譬如金翅鳥王,飛行虛空,迴翔不去,以清淨眼觀察海內諸龍宮殿,奮勇猛力,以左右翅鼓揚海水悉令兩闢,知龍男女命將盡者而搏取之。如來、應、正等覺金翅鳥王亦復如是,住無礙行,以淨佛眼觀察法界諸宮殿中一切眾生,若曾種善根已成熟者,如來奮勇猛十力,以止觀兩翅鼓揚生死大愛水海,使其兩闢而撮取之,置佛法中,令斷一切妄想戲論,安住如來無分別無礙行。佛子!譬如日月,獨無等侶,周行虛空,利益眾生,不作是念:『我從何來,而至何所。』諸佛如來亦復如是,性本寂滅,無有分別,示現遊行一切法界,為欲饒益諸眾生故,作諸佛事無有休息,不生如是戲論分別:『我從彼來,而向彼去。』佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應以如是等無量方便、無量性相,知見如來、應、正等覺所行之行。」 爾時,普賢菩薩欲重明此義而說頌言:   「譬如真如不生滅,無有方所無能見;
  大饒益者行如是,出過三世不可量。
  法界非界非非界,非是有量非無量;
  大功德者行亦然,非量無量無身故。
  如鳥飛行億千歲,前後虛空等無別;
  眾劫演說如來行,已說未說不可量。
  金翅在空觀大海,闢水搏取龍男女;
  十力能拔善根人,令出有海除眾惑。
  譬如日月遊虛空,照臨一切不分別;
  世尊周行於法界,教化眾生無動念。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

徵問標舉:菩薩應該怎樣知道如來的行

〔普賢菩薩摩訶薩對如來性起妙德菩薩等大眾說〕

「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應該怎樣知道如來、應、正等覺的行呢?佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應當知道:無礙行〔沒有障礙的行〕就是如來的行,應當知道:真如行〔與真如相契合的行〕就是如來的行。

真如絕三際:不生、不動、不起

「佛子!就像真如,在過去這一際不曾生起,在未來這一際不會變動,在現在也不曾發起;如來的行也是這樣,不生、不動、不起。

法界無形:不是有量,也不是無量

「佛子!就像法界,不是有量的,也不是無量的,因為它沒有形相的緣故;如來的行也是這樣,不是有量的,也不是無量的,因為它沒有形相的緣故。

鳥飛虛空喻:飛過的、沒飛過的,都量不出來

「佛子!譬如鳥在虛空中飛,飛了一百年,牠已經飛過的地方、還沒有飛過的地方,都不可以計量。為什麼呢?因為虛空這一界沒有邊際的緣故。如來的行也是這樣:假使有人經過百千億那由他劫〔極長的時劫〕去分別演說,那已經說出來的、還沒有說出來的,都不可以計量。為什麼呢?因為如來的行沒有邊際的緣故。

無住而示現:自己無住,卻讓一切眾生看見所行

「佛子!如來、應、正等覺安住在無礙行之中,並沒有一個安住的處所,卻能夠普遍地為一切眾生示現他所行的行,讓眾生見了之後,超出一切障礙之道。

金翅鳥王喻:以清淨眼觀海,以兩翅闢水

「佛子!譬如金翅鳥王,在虛空中飛行,盤旋迴翔而不離去,用清淨的眼睛觀察大海裡面各處龍的宮殿,奮起勇猛的力量,用左右兩翅鼓動海水,讓海水完全分向兩邊,牠知道哪些龍男龍女壽命將要盡了,就把牠們抓取上來。

金翅鳥喻的法合:止觀兩翅,撮取已熟的眾生

「如來、應、正等覺這位金翅鳥王也是這樣:安住在無礙行之中,用清淨的佛眼觀察法界中各處宮殿裡的一切眾生,如果有人曾經種下善根而且已經成熟了,如來就奮起勇猛的十力,用止與觀這兩隻翅膀,鼓動生死大愛的水海,讓它分向兩邊,而把那些眾生撮取上來,安置在佛法之中,讓他們斷除一切妄想戲論〔虛妄的想像與無益的言論〕,安住在如來那沒有分別的無礙行裡。

日月無思喻:周行虛空,卻不起來去之念

「佛子!譬如日月,獨自運行而沒有同等的伴侶,周遍地行走在虛空之中,利益眾生,卻不起這樣的念頭:『我從哪裡來,又要到哪裡去。』諸佛如來也是這樣:本性原就是寂滅的,沒有分別,卻示現遊行於一切法界,為了要饒益眾生的緣故,作種種佛事而沒有休息,並且不生起這樣的戲論分別:『我從那邊來,而要向那邊去。』

結勸:以無量方便、無量性相去知見佛的行

「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應當用像這樣的無量方便、無量性相,去知道、看見如來、應、正等覺所行的行。」

重頌:五偈重明此義

那時,普賢菩薩想要重新闡明這個義理,而說偈頌道:

「就像真如不生也不滅,沒有一定的方所,也沒有誰能看見它;大饒益者〔佛〕的行就是這樣,超出三世而不可計量。(頌真如絕三際)

「法界不是一個界,也不是不成其為界;不是有量的,也不是無量的;大功德者〔佛〕的行也是這樣,不是有量、不是無量,因為沒有身形的緣故。(頌法界無形)

「就像鳥飛行了億千年,前面的虛空與後面的虛空同樣沒有分別;經過眾多劫數去演說如來的行,已經說的與還沒有說的,都不可以計量。(頌鳥飛虛空喻)

「金翅鳥在空中觀察大海,分開海水抓取龍男龍女;十力〔佛〕能夠拔出有善根的人,讓他們出離生死之海、除去種種迷惑。(頌金翅鳥王喻)

「譬如日月遊行虛空,照臨一切而不起分別;世尊周遍行走於法界,教化眾生而不動一念。」(頌日月無思喻)


The Question Raised and the Names Set Up: How Should a Bodhisattva Know the Practice of the Tathāgata

〔The bodhisattva-mahāsattva Samantabhadra speaks to the bodhisattva Wondrous Virtue of the Tathāgata’s Nature-Arising and to the rest of the great assembly〕

“Sons of the Buddha! How should a bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the practice of the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One? Sons of the Buddha! A bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know that the unobstructed practice 〔the practice that has no obstruction in it〕 is the practice of the Tathāgata, and should know that the practice of suchness 〔the practice that tallies with suchness〕 is the practice of the Tathāgata.

Suchness Cuts Off the Three Limits of Time: Not Born, Not Moved, Not Arisen

“Sons of the Buddha! It is like suchness: in the prior limit it has not been born, in the later limit it will not move, and in the present it does not arise; so it is with the practice of the Tathāgata — not born, not moved, not arisen.

The Dharma Realm Has No Form: Neither Measured nor Measureless

“Sons of the Buddha! It is like the Dharma realm: it is not measured, and it is not measureless either, because it has no form; so it is with the practice of the Tathāgata — it is not measured, and it is not measureless, because it has no form.

The Simile of the Bird Flying in Space: Neither What It Has Flown Through nor What It Has Not Can Be Measured

“Sons of the Buddha! It is like a bird flying in space: though it fly for a hundred years, neither the region it has already passed through nor the region it has not yet passed through can be measured. Why is this? Because the realm of space has no bound. So it is with the practice of the Tathāgata: even were someone to spend a hundred thousand koṭis of nayutas of kalpas 〔an exceedingly long stretch of time〕 in explaining it distinctly, neither what he had already said nor what he had not yet said could be measured. Why is this? Because the practice of the Tathāgata has no bound.

Manifesting While Dwelling Nowhere: He Himself Dwells Nowhere, Yet Lets All Beings See the Practice He Practices

“Sons of the Buddha! The Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One dwells in the unobstructed practice and has no place of dwelling, and yet he is able to manifest universally to all sentient beings the practice that he practices, so that having seen it they go beyond every path of obstruction.

The Simile of the King of the Golden-Winged Birds: With Pure Eyes He Watches the Sea, With His Two Wings He Parts the Water

“Sons of the Buddha! It is like the king of the golden-winged birds: flying through space, he wheels and circles and does not go away; with pure eyes he watches the palaces of the dragons throughout the sea; he rouses his valiant strength, and with his left and right wings he beats up the sea water and makes it part on both sides; and knowing which of the dragon males and females are about to come to the end of their lives, he seizes them and bears them up.

The Dharma Correlate of the Bird Simile: The Two Wings of Calming and Contemplation, Seizing Up the Beings Who Are Ripe

“So it is with the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One, that king of the golden-winged birds: he dwells in the unobstructed practice, and with the pure buddha-eye he watches all the sentient beings in the palaces throughout the Dharma realm; and if there are those who have planted roots of goodness in the past and have already ripened, then the Tathāgata rouses his valiant ten powers and with the two wings of calming and contemplation beats up the great sea of the water of craving that is birth-and-death, makes it part on both sides, and seizes those beings up and sets them within the Buddha’s Dharma, causing them to cut off all false conceiving and frivolous talk 〔empty imagining and profitless speech〕 and to dwell in that unobstructed practice of the Tathāgata in which there is no discrimination.

The Simile of the Sun and Moon Without Thought: They Travel Throughout Space, Yet Give Rise to No Thought of Coming or Going

“Sons of the Buddha! It is like the sun and the moon: they travel alone and have no companion equal to them, they go everywhere throughout space and benefit sentient beings, and yet they do not give rise to a thought like this: ‘Where have I come from, and where am I going?’ So it is with the buddhas, the tathāgatas: their nature is from the first quiescent and has no discrimination in it, and yet they manifest themselves as journeying through the whole Dharma realm, and because they wish to benefit sentient beings they do all manner of buddha-work without rest, and they do not give rise to the frivolous, discriminating thought: ‘I have come from over there, and I am going toward over there.’

The Concluding Exhortation: Know and See the Buddha’s Practice by Measureless Means and Measureless Natures and Characteristics

“Sons of the Buddha! A bodhisattva-mahāsattva should use measureless means such as these, and measureless natures and characteristics, to know and to see the practice that the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One practices.”

The Verses in Repetition: Five Stanzas Setting Forth This Meaning Again

At that time Samantabhadra Bodhisattva, wishing to set forth this meaning again, spoke in verse:

“It is like suchness, neither born nor ceasing, having no fixed place, and no one able to see it; the practice of the one of great bountiful benefit 〔the Buddha〕 is just so — it goes beyond the three times and cannot be measured. (Setting forth again that suchness cuts off the three limits of time)

“The Dharma realm is not a realm, nor yet is it not a realm; it is not measured, and it is not measureless; the practice of the one of great merit 〔the Buddha〕 is likewise — neither measured nor measureless, because it has no bodily form. (Setting forth again that the Dharma realm has no form)

“It is like a bird that has flown for a koṭi of thousands of years: the space ahead and the space behind are alike, without difference; and though one spend many kalpas explaining the practice of the Tathāgata, what has been said and what has not been said alike cannot be measured. (Setting forth again the simile of the bird flying in space)

“The golden-winged bird in the air watches the great sea, parts the water and seizes the dragon males and females; the one of ten powers 〔the Buddha〕 can draw out the people who have roots of goodness, causing them to come forth from the sea of existence and to be rid of every delusion. (Setting forth again the simile of the king of the golden-winged birds)

“It is like the sun and the moon journeying through space, shining down upon all things and yet not discriminating; the World-Honored One goes everywhere throughout the Dharma realm, teaching and transforming sentient beings without a single thought stirring.” (Setting forth again the simile of the sun and moon without thought)

義疏Exposition

為什麼要問『如來的行』

前一義問的是佛的境界——那是所知的境;這一義忽然轉問:那麼佛在這境上做什麼。普賢一開口仍是問句:「菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺行?」注意他問的仍不是『如來的行是什麼』,而是『菩薩應該怎樣知道』。行本身不可思議,知行的路數卻指得出來。

有人會覺得,前面既已說到佛境無量無邊、譬喻不及,再問行豈不多餘。這正是本義要排的第一個誤解。澄觀繫此段之來意云「前明分齊境智無邊,今彰運用則悲智無盡,雖智海已滿,悲無息故」——智海是滿的,可悲心不會因此停下來;智說到滿處是境,悲流出去就是行。法藏繫得更直:「前明智所依境,今辨依境所成之行」。

所以這一問是把前義接回動處:知道了佛的果德有多大,還要知道那樣的果德在世間如何運作。落到讀者身上,這是問『證到那一步的人,還做不做事,怎麼做』。

兩個行名:無礙行與真如行

普賢的答案先立兩個名:「應知無礙行是如來行,應知真如行是如來行。」為什麼要立兩個。

澄觀在這裡一連給了四重相待的讀法,講得極細:「一無礙行者,即理之事行。真如行者,即事之理行。前即行相,後即行體。又前是即智之悲,後是即悲之智。前即真之俗,後即俗之真,融而無礙為如來行。」四重說的其實是同一件事的兩面——無礙行是事上見的行,可這事不離理;真如行是理上說的行,可這理不離事。前者是行的相貌,後者是行的體性;前者是智裡流出來的悲,後者是悲裡不失的智。

要排的誤解是:把兩個行當成佛有兩套行為,一套對真、一套對俗。澄觀最後一句已經堵住了——「融而無礙為如來行」,融通起來沒有隔閡,才叫如來行。二名是為了讓讀者兩邊都看得見,不是佛真有兩種行。落地處在此:你若以為做事是做事、修行是修行,那就正落在被此段所破的那一分別上。

真如行:從三際上斷掉『開始』這個念頭

第一節釋真如行,用的是真如自身:「如真如,前際不生,後際不動,現在不起;如來行亦如是,不生、不動、不起。」

先問一句:行明明是動的,怎麼會不生不動。澄觀解得很妥貼:「明體絕三際,故同真如。契如成行,行即如也。過未非緣,故不生不動;現在離緣,故非起也。」關鍵在「契如成行,行即如也」——這個行不是另外造出來的一段動作,是契合真如而成的行,所以行本身就是如。過去未來不是它的緣,所以說不生不動;現在也不待緣而起,所以說非起。

要排的誤解是:不生不動不是說佛不動。是說這個行沒有一個『從此開始』的時點可指。法藏把這一句列為五喻之首,稱「真無遷變喻,喻佛至絕三際行」。落到讀者處:凡你能指出起點的,將來必定能指出結束;佛的行指不出開始,所以也沒有窮盡的一天。

法界無形:不是有量,也不是無量

第二節換一個所依:「如法界,非量、非無量,無形故」——如來行也是這樣。

這裡最容易讀滑過去。既然說不是有量,順口就會補一句『所以是無量』——本義偏偏把這條退路也堵了。澄觀點得極準:「既無有量,何有無量?若謂無量,即是量故。」無量若被立成一個相,它就又變成一種量了。所以要雙非。而雙非的所以然只有三個字:「無形故」——沒有形相可依,量與無量都無處安立。

澄觀由此推開一句:「二復舉法界無形明雙非契中,是知實相等,皆如來行。」凡是實相一類的名目,都是如來行。然後他下了一個在全段最有力的結語:「雙非永寂,為如來行,故心彌虛、行彌曠,終日行而未曾行。」心愈空,行愈廣;一整天都在行,而不曾有一個『我在行』擱在那裡。他還引《涅槃》為證。

落地處:不要急著給佛的行找一個尺寸,連『無限大』也是尺寸。

鳥飛虛空:說得再多,也說不完

第三節設第一個正式的譬喻:鳥在虛空裡飛了一百年,飛過的地方、沒飛過的地方都量不出來——因為虛空無邊際。合到法上:就算有人用百千億那由他劫去分別演說如來的行,已說的、未說的一樣量不出來——因為如來行無邊際。

澄觀在此指出「非量」其實有兩層:「一行廣無量故,云如來行無邊際故;二即事同真便無分量,故以空喻。」第一層是量上的,行太廣;第二層是體上的,事既同於真,本來就沒有分量可說。經文兩層都用了——先說鳥飛之處不可量(廣),再說虛空無邊際(無分量)。

要排的誤解是:以為這一喻只是在誇大。它不是誇大,是在說明一種結構——說出來的部分永遠不會使沒說的部分變少,因為所量者本無邊際。本經反覆演說如來行而不厭,是「已說、未說皆不可量」的必然。落到讀者處:不必等到聽全了才修,也不必因為聽不全而灰心。

無住而示現:自己站不住的地方,卻能給人看見路

第四節從喻回到法,說無礙行的本相:「如來、應、正等覺住無礙行,無有住處,而能普為一切眾生示現所行,令其見已,出過一切諸障礙道。」

住而無住處,這句話像是自相矛盾。澄觀把它拆成悲智兩邊,一句話講透:「智無所住,悲示所行,即悲智無礙,自無二礙、令他無礙,皆無礙行也。」智這一邊沒有住處,悲那一邊示現所行;智不住所以不落,悲示現所以能度。而所謂無礙,還不只是自己不被礙住——「自無二礙、令他無礙」,自己無礙,並且讓別人也無礙,兩重都做到才叫無礙行。

要排的誤解是:無住不等於不作為。經文緊接著就說「能普為一切眾生示現所行」,而且效驗是明確的——眾生見了就「出過一切諸障礙道」。落地處:佛給人看見的不是一個結論,是一條走過的路;看見路的人才走得出障礙。

金翅鳥王:兩翅一闢,海就開了

第五節是全段最有畫面的一喻。金翅鳥王在虛空中盤旋不去,用清淨的眼睛看海底龍宮,奮起勇猛之力,左右兩翅一鼓,海水就向兩邊分開,牠知道哪些龍男龍女命將盡了,就取上來。

合到法上,每一件都對得極整齊:鳥王住空,對如來住無礙行;清淨眼,對淨佛眼;觀海內龍宮,對觀法界諸宮殿中一切眾生;勇猛力,對勇猛十力;左右兩翅,對止與觀;海水,對生死大愛水海;搏取,對撮取而置佛法中。澄觀判此喻為「初金翅闢海喻,喻即智之悲」,法藏判為「金翅搏海喻。喻佛勝用濟生行」。

有兩個地方要留意。其一是「若曾種善根已成熟者」——鳥王取的是命將盡的龍,佛取的是善根已熟的人。這不是佛有揀擇之心,是機有生熟之別;已熟者一觸即出。其二是「止觀兩翅」:闢開愛海要兩隻翅膀,單止不行,單觀也不行。落到讀者處,這一喻其實是在說你自己那一分——你的善根熟不熟,決定了此刻是被撮取的那一個,還是仍在水裡的那一個。

日月無思:照了一整天,不曾起一個念

第六節換一個極安靜的喻:日月獨自運行虛空,沒有伴侶,利益眾生,卻從不起「我從何來,而至何所」的念頭。合到法上:諸佛「性本寂滅,無有分別」,卻示現遊行一切法界,作佛事無有休息,並不生「我從彼來,而向彼去」的戲論分別。

前一喻是勇猛的,這一喻是無思的——澄觀把兩喻的分工說得很清楚:「初金翅闢海喻,喻即智之悲;後日月無思喻,喻悲不失智。」一個顯悲的力量,一個顯悲中不失的智。法藏則稱之為「日月行空喻。喻佛無功成事行」——沒有造作之功,而事情成了。

要排的誤解是:無分別不等於不知道。日月不作念頭,可它照的時候,該亮的地方一處也不少。落地處極實在:真正利益人的時候,心裡若還記著『我在利益他·我從哪裡來為他』,那一段記著的分別,就是本義所說的戲論。作而無念,才是這一喻要你學的。

結勸:拿無量的門去知見無量的行

長行最後一句收回到菩薩身上:「菩薩摩訶薩應以如是等無量方便、無量性相,知見如來、應、正等覺所行之行。」澄觀科此為雙結,並指出結法的巧處:「性結真如,相結無礙。」——「無量性相」四字裡,性字回應真如行,相字回應無礙行,前面雙標的兩個行,在結句裡各歸其位。

這句也在提醒一件事:前面所舉的五事只是「如是等」,是例,不是全部。要知見無量的行,就得用無量的門去知——一個譬喻、一種理路,都不足以窮盡。

落地處在「知見」二字上。知是解得,見是親見;解得了佛的行是什麼樣的行,自己發心行事的形貌才會跟著改——不再急著在事上留一個自己。

重頌五偈

長行說完,普賢以五偈重明。五偈與五段長行對得極整齊,並不另出新義:首偈「譬如真如不生滅」對真如絕三際,次偈「法界非界非非界」對法界無形,三偈「如鳥飛行億千歲」對鳥飛虛空,四偈「金翅在空觀大海」對金翅鳥王,末偈「譬如日月遊虛空」對日月無思。

頌中值得留意的是遣詞。長行說如來,頌中換作「大饒益者」「大功德者」「十力」「世尊」——同一位佛,就其所顯的德而立名,饒益是就悲說,功德是就滿說,十力是就力用說。又如末偈「教化眾生無動念」一句,把長行「不生如是戲論分別」壓成五字,是頌體的長處:長行講理路,頌把理路壓成一個可以帶著走的句子。

承衍

本義為華嚴宗理事無礙義之經據所在。澄觀以「即理之事行」「即事之理行」釋二行,而以「融而無礙為如來行」收之——理與事不在二行之外別立,即在二行之相即。法藏則標本義之科逕作「性起行」,繫之於前義之境——「前明智所依境,今辨依境所成之行」。行非別起,即依所證之境而成,與前義『智海從往昔大願生起』一句同為〈如來出現〉一品性起義之骨。

二家所判亦有不同,並錄於此。二行之釋,澄觀作四重相待,法藏則出三家——古人以俗諦真諦分之,今更釋以會事同理與事盡理現分之,又釋以量智理智分之。喻之配屬,澄觀以真如絕三際、法界無形、鳥飛虛空三節屬真如行,以金翅、日月二喻屬無礙行;法藏則唯以真無遷變一喻屬如如行,餘四喻俱屬無礙行——法界無形與鳥飛二節之歸屬,二家判異(法藏云「下四釋無礙行」,四者即法界無形、鳥飛、金翅、日月)。頌數之判,澄觀依八十本,其文為七言五偈;法藏依六十本作十偈頌五喻,各二頌。二家所疏之本本異,古有異說,誌錄之,不判。

異譯之異亦誌於考據:六十本作「如如行」即八十本「真如行」,作「不滅、不至、不起」即八十本「不生、不動、不起」,作「無量無縛」「無身故」即八十本「非量、非無量」「無形故」。八十本日月喻多「獨無等侶」「利益眾生」二語,合語作「性本寂滅,無有分別」,六十本則作「周行無礙解脫虛空,分別一切法界」。照實錄,不強解。

至於《起信論》、《華嚴一乘教義分齊章》以及成唯識、攝論、瑜伽諸論,於本義之專屬牒句皆零命中——本義無唯識軸承衍之直接文據,據實標闕,不以他處之文充之。澄觀於雙非之下所引《涅槃》一句,繫屬在澄觀,非本經之文。

Why Ask About “the Practice of the Tathāgata”

The sense before this one asked about the realm of the Buddha — that is the object known; this sense turns all at once and asks: then what does the Buddha do upon that object? Samantabhadra opens his mouth and it is still a question: “How should a bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the practice of the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One?” Notice that what he asks is still not “what the practice of the Tathāgata is,” but “how a bodhisattva should know it.” The practice itself is inconceivable; the way of knowing the practice can nevertheless be pointed out.

Someone may feel that since the foregoing has already said that the Buddha’s realm is measureless and boundless and beyond the reach of similes, asking about his practice is superfluous. This is precisely the first misunderstanding this sense has to clear away. Chengguan states the reason for the coming of this passage: “what was set forth earlier was the measure of the realm and the boundlessness of wisdom; now what is made manifest is the functioning, and there compassion and wisdom are inexhaustible — for though the ocean of wisdom is already full, compassion does not rest.” The ocean of wisdom is full, yet the compassionate mind will not stop on that account; wisdom spoken of at its point of fullness is the realm, and compassion flowing outward is the practice. Fazang ties it more directly still: “earlier what was set forth was the realm upon which wisdom depends; now what is discerned is the practice accomplished in dependence upon that realm.”

So this question carries the previous sense back into the place of movement: having come to know how vast the fruit-virtue of a buddha is, one must further know how a fruit-virtue like that operates in the world. Brought down to the reader, this is the question, ‘does someone who has realized that far still do things, and how does he do them?’

The Two Names of Practice: The Unobstructed Practice and the Practice of Suchness

Samantabhadra’s answer first sets up two names: “one should know that the unobstructed practice is the practice of the Tathāgata, and should know that the practice of suchness is the practice of the Tathāgata.” Why set up two?

Chengguan here gives four paired readings one after another, and expounds them very finely: “First, the unobstructed practice is the practice of phenomena that is identical with principle. The practice of suchness is the practice of principle that is identical with phenomena. The former is the characteristic of practice, the latter is the substance of practice. Again, the former is the compassion that is identical with wisdom, the latter the wisdom that is identical with compassion. The former is the conventional that is identical with the true, the latter the true that is identical with the conventional; and their fusing without obstruction is the practice of the Tathāgata.” What the four pairs say is in fact two sides of one and the same thing — the unobstructed practice is the practice seen upon phenomena, yet these phenomena are not apart from principle; the practice of suchness is the practice spoken of upon principle, yet this principle is not apart from phenomena. The former is the look of the practice, the latter its substance; the former is compassion flowing out of wisdom, the latter the wisdom that is not lost within compassion.

The misunderstanding to be cleared away is this: taking the two practices to mean that the Buddha has two sets of behavior, one set for the true and one set for the conventional. Chengguan’s last clause has already blocked it — “their fusing without obstruction is the practice of the Tathāgata”: only when they fuse and there is no partition between them is it called the practice of the Tathāgata. The two names are there so that the reader can see both sides, not because the Buddha really has two kinds of practice. Here is where it comes to ground: if you suppose that doing things is one matter and cultivating the path another, you have fallen into exactly the discrimination this passage breaks.

The Practice of Suchness: Cutting Off the Notion of a ‘Beginning’ by Way of the Three Limits of Time

The first section explains the practice of suchness, and what it uses is suchness itself: “It is like suchness: in the prior limit it has not been born, in the later limit it will not move, and in the present it does not arise; so it is with the practice of the Tathāgata — not born, not moved, not arisen.”

First a question: practice is plainly something in motion; how can it be unborn and unmoving? Chengguan explains it very aptly: “this makes clear that its substance cuts off the three limits of time, and therefore it is the same as suchness. Tallying with suchness, practice is accomplished, and the practice is itself suchness. Past and future are not its conditions, and therefore it is said to be unborn and unmoving; the present is apart from conditions, and therefore it does not arise.” The pivot lies in “tallying with suchness, practice is accomplished, and the practice is itself suchness” — this practice is not some separate stretch of activity produced on the side; it is a practice accomplished by tallying with suchness, and so the practice itself is suchness. Past and future are not its conditions, and hence it is called unborn and unmoving; the present too does not arise in dependence on conditions, and hence it is called not arisen.

The misunderstanding to be cleared away is this: unborn, unmoving, and unarisen do not mean that the Buddha does not move. They mean that this practice has no point in time to which one could point and say ‘it begins from here.’ Fazang lists this clause as the first of the five similes, calling it “the simile of the true that does not shift or alter, figuring the Buddha’s practice that reaches to the cutting off of the three limits of time.” Brought down to the reader: whatever you can name a starting point for, you will one day be able to name its ending too; the Buddha’s practice admits of no beginning to point to, and therefore it has no day of exhaustion either.

The Dharma Realm Has No Form: Neither Measured nor Measureless

The second section changes what it depends upon: “It is like the Dharma realm: it is not measured, it is not measureless, because it has no form” — and so it is with the practice of the Tathāgata.

This is the easiest place to read straight past. Since it says the practice is not measured, one will readily add, ‘so it is measureless’ — and this sense blocks that way of retreat as well. Chengguan puts his finger on it exactly: “Since there is no measure, how could there be the measureless? For if one calls it measureless, that is precisely a measure.” If the measureless is set up as a characteristic, it turns into a kind of measure all over again. Hence the double negation. And the whole reason for the double negation is just three words: “because it has no form” — with no form to depend on, neither measure nor the measureless has anywhere to be established.

From this Chengguan pushes on to say: “Second, he further raises the formlessness of the Dharma realm to make clear that the double negation tallies with the middle; from which one knows that true reality and the like are all the practice of the Tathāgata.” Whatever bears a name of the sort ‘true reality’ is the practice of the Tathāgata. Then he sets down the most forceful summing-up in the whole passage: “The double negation, everlastingly still, is the practice of the Tathāgata; therefore the more the mind is empty, the more the practice is vast — practicing all day long and yet never having practiced.” The emptier the mind, the vaster the practice; a whole day spent practicing, and yet no ‘I am practicing’ lodged anywhere. He cites the Nirvāṇa Sūtra as well for a witness.

Where it comes to ground: do not be in a hurry to find a size for the Buddha’s practice — even ‘infinitely large’ is a size.

The Bird Flying in Space: However Much Is Said, It Will Never Be Said Out

The third section sets out the first formal simile: a bird flies in space for a hundred years, and neither the region it has flown through nor the region it has not can be measured — because space has no bound. Brought over to the dharma: even were someone to spend a hundred thousand koṭis of nayutas of kalpas explaining the practice of the Tathāgata distinctly, what has been said and what has not been said alike cannot be measured — because the practice of the Tathāgata has no bound.

Chengguan points out here that “not measured” in fact has two layers: “First, because the practice is vast and measureless, it says that the practice of the Tathāgata has no bound. Second, phenomena being identical with the true, there is simply no quantity, and therefore space is used as the simile.” The first layer belongs to quantity — the practice is too vast; the second belongs to substance — phenomena being identical with the true, there is from the first no quantity to be spoken of. The sūtra text uses both layers: first it says the places the bird has flown cannot be measured (vastness), then it says space has no bound (no quantity).

The misunderstanding to be cleared away is the notion that this simile is merely exaggeration. It is not exaggeration; it is stating a structure — the part that is said will never make the part that is unsaid any smaller, because what is being measured has no bound in the first place. That this sūtra expounds the practice of the Tathāgata again and again without wearying is the necessary consequence of “what has been said and what has not been said alike cannot be measured.” Brought down to the reader: you need not wait until you have heard the whole of it to cultivate, nor be disheartened because you cannot hear the whole of it.

Manifesting While Dwelling Nowhere: In the Very Place Where He Cannot Stand, He Lets Others See the Road

The fourth section returns from simile to dharma and states the proper character of the unobstructed practice: “The Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One dwells in the unobstructed practice and has no place of dwelling, and yet he is able to manifest universally to all sentient beings the practice that he practices, so that having seen it they go beyond every path of obstruction.”

To dwell, and yet to have no place of dwelling — the sentence looks self-contradictory. Chengguan takes it apart into the two sides of compassion and wisdom and says it through in a single line: “Wisdom dwells nowhere, compassion manifests what is practiced; that is, compassion and wisdom are unobstructed — he is himself without the two obstructions and he causes others to be unobstructed, and all of this is the unobstructed practice.” On the side of wisdom there is no place of dwelling; on the side of compassion the practice is manifested; because wisdom does not dwell it does not fall, and because compassion manifests it can ferry others across. And what is called unobstructedness is not merely one’s own not being obstructed — “he is himself without the two obstructions and he causes others to be unobstructed”: to be unobstructed oneself and also to make others unobstructed, both together, is what is called the unobstructed practice.

The misunderstanding to be cleared away is this: dwelling nowhere is not the same as not acting. The sūtra says immediately afterward that “he is able to manifest universally to all sentient beings the practice that he practices,” and the effect is stated plainly — having seen it, beings “go beyond every path of obstruction.” Where it comes to ground: what the Buddha lets people see is not a conclusion but a road that has been walked; only one who sees the road can walk his way out of obstruction.

The King of the Golden-Winged Birds: One Beat of the Two Wings, and the Sea Opens

The fifth section is the most vivid simile in the whole passage. The king of the golden-winged birds wheels in space and does not go away; with pure eyes he looks at the dragon palaces at the bottom of the sea; he rouses his valiant strength, gives one beat of his left and right wings, and the sea water parts on both sides; and knowing which of the dragon males and females are about to come to the end of their lives, he takes them up.

Brought over to the dharma, every item corresponds with perfect neatness: the bird king dwelling in space answers to the Tathāgata dwelling in the unobstructed practice; the pure eyes answer to the pure buddha-eye; watching the dragon palaces within the sea answers to watching all the sentient beings in the palaces throughout the Dharma realm; the valiant strength answers to the valiant ten powers; the left and right wings answer to calming and contemplation; the sea water answers to the great sea of the water of craving that is birth-and-death; and the seizing answers to seizing them up and setting them within the Buddha’s Dharma. Chengguan judges this simile to be “the first, the simile of the golden-winged bird parting the sea, figuring the compassion that is identical with wisdom,” and Fazang judges it to be “the simile of the golden-winged bird seizing through the sea. It figures the Buddha’s practice of surpassing function that rescues the living.”

There are two places to attend to. The first is “if there are those who have planted roots of goodness in the past and have already ripened” — the bird king takes the dragons whose lives are about to end, and the Buddha takes the people whose roots of goodness have ripened. This is not that the Buddha has a picking-and-choosing mind; it is that the capacities differ in ripeness and rawness, and one already ripe comes out at a touch. The second is “the two wings of calming and contemplation”: parting the sea of craving takes two wings, and calming alone will not do it, nor contemplation alone. Brought down to the reader, this simile is in fact speaking of your own portion — whether your roots of goodness are ripe decides whether you are the one seized up at this moment or the one still in the water.

The Sun and Moon Without Thought: Shining a Whole Day and Never Giving Rise to a Single Thought

The sixth section changes to an extremely quiet simile: the sun and moon travel alone through space, without companion, benefiting sentient beings, and yet they never give rise to the thought “where have I come from, and where am I going?” Brought over to the dharma: the buddhas, “their nature from the first quiescent and without discrimination,” nevertheless manifest themselves as journeying through the whole Dharma realm and do buddha-work without rest, and do not give rise to the frivolous, discriminating thought “I have come from over there, and I am going toward over there.”

The previous simile was one of valor, this one is one of thoughtlessness — Chengguan states the division of labor between the two similes very clearly: “the first, the simile of the golden-winged bird parting the sea, figures the compassion that is identical with wisdom; the latter, the simile of the sun and moon without thought, figures the compassion that does not lose wisdom.” One displays the power of compassion, the other the wisdom that is not lost within compassion. Fazang for his part calls it “the simile of the sun and moon traveling in space. It figures the Buddha’s practice of accomplishing affairs without effort” — there is no work of contrivance, and the affair is accomplished.

The misunderstanding to be cleared away is this: to be without discrimination is not the same as not knowing. The sun and moon frame no thought, and yet when they shine, not one place that ought to be lit is missing. Where it comes to ground is very concrete: when you are truly benefiting someone, if the mind still keeps in it ‘I am benefiting him · where did I come from for his sake,’ that stretch of keeping-in-mind is what this sense calls frivolous talk. To act and yet be without thought about it — that is what this simile would have you learn.

The Concluding Exhortation: Take Measureless Gates to Know and See a Measureless Practice

The last sentence of the prose section draws back to the bodhisattva: “A bodhisattva-mahāsattva should use measureless means such as these, and measureless natures and characteristics, to know and to see the practice that the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One practices.” Chengguan places this in his outline as a double conclusion, and points out the deftness of the way it concludes: “nature concludes suchness, characteristic concludes the unobstructed.” — within the four words “measureless natures and characteristics,” the word nature answers to the practice of suchness and the word characteristic answers to the unobstructed practice; the two practices set up in pairs at the beginning each return to their own place in the concluding sentence.

This sentence is also a reminder of one thing: the five matters raised earlier are only “such as these,” instances and not the whole. To know and to see a measureless practice, one must know by measureless gates — no one simile, no one line of reasoning, is enough to exhaust it.

Where it comes to ground is in the two words “know and see.” To know is to understand, to see is to behold for oneself; once one has understood what kind of practice the Buddha’s practice is, the very shape of one’s own resolve and one’s own doing will change along with it — one will no longer be in a hurry to leave a self behind in the things one does.

The Five Verses in Repetition

When the prose section is finished, Samantabhadra sets the meaning forth again in five verses. The five verses answer to the five prose passages with perfect neatness and put forward no new meaning: the first verse, “It is like suchness, neither born nor ceasing,” answers to suchness cutting off the three limits of time; the second, “The Dharma realm is not a realm, nor yet is it not a realm,” answers to the Dharma realm having no form; the third, “It is like a bird that has flown for a koṭi of thousands of years,” answers to the bird flying in space; the fourth, “The golden-winged bird in the air watches the great sea,” answers to the king of the golden-winged birds; the last, “It is like the sun and the moon journeying through space,” answers to the sun and moon without thought.

What is worth attending to in the verses is the choice of words. The prose says the Tathāgata; the verses change to “the one of great bountiful benefit,” “the one of great merit,” “the one of ten powers,” “the World-Honored One” — one and the same buddha, named according to the virtue he displays: bountiful benefit is said with respect to compassion, merit with respect to fullness, the ten powers with respect to the working of power. So too the last verse’s line “teaching and transforming sentient beings without a single thought stirring,” which compresses the prose’s “he does not give rise to a frivolous, discriminating thought like this” into five graphs: this is the strength of the verse form — prose lays out the reasoning, and verse compresses the reasoning into a sentence one can carry along.

Lineage

This sense is where the scriptural ground of the Huayan school’s doctrine of the non-obstruction of principle and phenomena lies. Chengguan explains the two practices as “the practice of phenomena that is identical with principle” and “the practice of principle that is identical with phenomena,” and closes with “their fusing without obstruction is the practice of the Tathāgata” — principle and phenomena are not set up separately outside the two practices; they lie in the very mutual identity of those two practices. Fazang for his part names this sense in his outline straightforwardly as “the practice of nature-arising,” tying it to the realm of the preceding sense — “earlier what was set forth was the realm upon which wisdom depends; now what is discerned is the practice accomplished in dependence upon that realm.” The practice does not arise separately; it is accomplished precisely in dependence upon the realm realized — which, together with the earlier sense’s line ‘the ocean of wisdom arises from the great vows of ages past,’ forms the backbone of the doctrine of nature-arising in this chapter, The Appearance of the Tathāgata.

The judgments of the two masters also differ, and both are recorded here. On the explanation of the two practices, Chengguan makes four paired readings, while Fazang sets out three: the ancients divided them by the conventional truth and the true truth; the further explanation divides them by the gathering of phenomena into sameness with principle and by phenomena being exhausted and principle appearing; and the additional explanation divides them by discerning wisdom and principial wisdom. On the assignment of the similes, Chengguan assigns the three sections — suchness cutting off the three limits of time, the Dharma realm having no form, and the bird flying in space — to the practice of suchness, and the two similes of the golden-winged bird and of the sun and moon to the unobstructed practice; Fazang assigns only the one simile of the true that does not shift or alter to the practice of thusness, and the remaining four similes all to the unobstructed practice — so that on the assignment of the two sections, the Dharma realm having no form and the bird flying, the two masters judge differently (Fazang says “the four below explain the unobstructed practice,” the four being the Dharma realm having no form, the bird flying, the golden-winged bird, and the sun and moon). On the judgment of the number of verses, Chengguan follows the eighty-fascicle text, whose text has five verses of seven graphs; Fazang follows the sixty-fascicle text and makes it ten verses setting forth the five similes, two verses each. The texts the two commented upon are different texts; the ancients held differing views, and these are recorded without adjudication.

The divergences of the parallel translation are likewise recorded in the apparatus: the sixty-fascicle text has “the practice of thusness” where the eighty-fascicle text has “the practice of suchness”; it has “not ceasing, not arriving, not arisen” where the eighty has “not born, not moved, not arisen”; and it has “measureless and unbound” and “because it has no body” where the eighty has “not measured, not measureless” and “because it has no form.” In the simile of the sun and moon the eighty-fascicle text has in addition the two phrases “alone and without companion equal to them” and “benefiting sentient beings,” and its dharma correlate reads “their nature is from the first quiescent and has no discrimination,” whereas the sixty-fascicle text reads “traveling everywhere through the space of unobstructed liberation, discriminating the whole Dharma realm.” These are recorded as they stand, without forcing an explanation.

As for the Dasheng qixin lun, the Wujiao zhang, and the Cheng weishi lun, the She dacheng lun, and the Yuqie shidi lun — for all of these, a dedicated citation of this sense yields no hits at all: this sense has no direct textual warrant carried forward on the consciousness-only line, and the lack is recorded as it stands, with nothing from elsewhere put in its place. The line from the Nirvāṇa Sūtra that Chengguan cites beneath the double negation belongs to Chengguan, and is not text of this sūtra.

考據Apparatus

第六義『出現之行』=普賢答「菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺行」〔T10n0279 0274b17〕。先雙標二行——無礙行·真如行,次以五事釋之(真如絕三際·法界非量非無量而無形·鳥飛虛空·金翅鳥王闢海·日月周行無思),末雙結而勸知見,後有重頌五偈。澄觀科為「先標舉、後釋相」,判二行為「前即真之俗,後即俗之真,融而無礙為如來行」〔T35n1735 0881b09〕;法藏標本義之科逕作「性起行」,判長行為標·釋·結三分,而釋中開五喻。二家於喻之配屬與頌數之判開合不同——澄觀依八十本作五偈,法藏依六十本作十偈。


一、科判定位

科判系統此義之位
底本 T279 三十九品品三十七 如來出現品(第七會 重會普光明殿)·第六義 出現之行〔T10n0279 0274b17〕起–〔0274c28〕前訖
澄觀《華嚴經疏》第六出現之行〔T35n1735 0881b03〕起–〔0881c01〕前訖;長行分二=標舉·釋相,釋相中三=雙標二行·雙釋二行·雙結二行
澄觀《隨疏演義鈔》本範圍內未見獨立標題科起(鈔隨疏逐句注·未逐句配對)〔查無〕
法藏《探玄記》(六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品〉疏)第六性起行〔T35n1733 0412b17〕起–〔0412c02〕前訖;長行內三=標·釋·結,釋中有五喻
李通玄《新華嚴經論》本義專屬起訖科段未見(全書「如來出現品」命中皆他章引證散句)〔查無〕

來意——澄觀繫此第六義於前第五義『出現之境界』,明由境而成行:

「第六出現之行。前明分齊境智無邊,今彰運用則悲智無盡,雖智海已滿,悲無息故。」〔T35n1735 0881b03〕

法藏繫之同揆,而標名作「性起行」:

「第六性起行者,前明智所依境,今辨依境所成之行,故次明也。」〔T35n1733 0412b17〕

長行之分——澄觀分二而釋相中三:

「長行中二:先標舉、後釋相。釋相中三:初雙標二行、次雙釋二行、後雙結二行。」〔T35n1735 0881b05〕

法藏分三:

「就辨釋中,長行內三,謂標、釋、結。初中標二行。」〔T35n1733 0412b19〕

釋段之內科——澄觀於雙釋中先真如行後無礙行:

「先釋真如行、後釋無礙行。」〔T35n1735 0881b11〕

真如行下三節:

「今初,真如之名,言含法喻。文中有三:初牒名以解,明體絕三際,故同真如。契如成行,行即如也。過未非緣,故不生不動;現在離緣,故非起也。」〔T35n1735 0881b12〕

無礙行下法喻二分:

「文中二:先約法總明、後以喻別顯。」〔T35n1735 0881b24〕

「二別以喻顯中二喻:初金翅闢海喻,喻即智之悲;後日月無思喻,喻悲不失智。」〔T35n1735 0881b26〕

結分——澄觀:「性結真如,相結無礙。」〔T35n1735 0881b29〕法藏:「三結文可知。」〔T35n1733 0412c01〕


二、術語

漢所徵精義
無礙行本義「應知無礙行是如來行」〔T10n0279 0274b18〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕二行之一;澄觀:「一無礙行者,即理之事行。」〔T35n1735 0881b07〕法藏今釋:「初是會事同理,理不礙事,是無礙行」〔T35n1733 0412b21〕
真如行本義「應知真如行是如來行」〔T10n0279 0274b19〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕二行之二;澄觀:「真如行者,即事之理行。」〔T35n1735 0881b08〕60 本作「如如行」〔T09n0278 0626a16〕
前際不生·後際不動·現在不起本義「如真如,前際不生,後際不動,現在不起」〔T10n0279 0274b19〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕三際俱絕之表法;澄觀:「明體絕三際,故同真如……過未非緣,故不生不動;現在離緣,故非起也。」〔T35n1735 0881b13〕
非量·非無量本義「如法界,非量、非無量,無形故」〔T10n0279 0274b21〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕雙非之句;澄觀:「既無有量,何有無量?若謂無量,即是量故。」〔T35n1735 0881b19〕
金翅鳥王本義「譬如金翅鳥王,飛行虛空」〔T10n0279 0274b29〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕喻依之主;食龍之鳥王,經以喻佛之勇猛拔濟
止觀兩翅本義「以止觀兩翅鼓揚生死大愛水海」〔T10n0279 0274c06〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕合喻之樞;以止與觀二法當鳥之左右翅
生死大愛水海本義「鼓揚生死大愛水海,使其兩闢而撮取之」〔T10n0279 0274c07〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕所闢之海;60 本作「生死大愛海水」〔T09n0278 0626b08〕
妄想戲論本義「令斷一切妄想戲論,安住如來無分別無礙行」〔T10n0279 0274c08〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕所斷之惑;60 本作「除滅一切妄想顛倒」〔T09n0278 0626b09〕
獨無等侶本義「譬如日月,獨無等侶,周行虛空」〔T10n0279 0274c09〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕日月喻之喻依語;80 本獨有,60 本無此四字
性本寂滅本義「諸佛如來亦復如是,性本寂滅,無有分別」〔T10n0279 0274c11〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕日月喻之合語;顯無思而成事
無量方便·無量性相本義「應以如是等無量方便、無量性相,知見如來、應、正等覺所行之行」〔T10n0279 0274c14〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕結勸之語;60 本作「以如是等無量無邊勝行」〔T09n0278 0626b15〕

三、譬喻·修辭

(一) 真如絕三際喻——「佛子!如真如,前際不生,後際不動,現在不起;如來行亦如是,不生、不動、不起。」〔T10n0279 0274b19〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕:

  • 喻依:真如於前際不生、後際不動、現在不起。
  • 喻體:如來行亦不生、不動、不起。
  • 所顯義:澄觀判此為真如行之首節,「契如成行,行即如也」〔T35n1735 0881b14〕。法藏則列為五喻之第一:「一真無遷變喻,喻佛至絕三際行,即釋如如行也。」〔T35n1733 0412b24〕

(二) 法界無形喻——「佛子!如法界,非量、非無量,無形故;如來行亦如是,非量、非無量,無形故。」〔T10n0279 0274b21〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕:

  • 喻依:法界無形,故非量亦非無量。
  • 喻體:如來行亦非量非無量而無形。
  • 所顯義:澄觀:「二復舉法界無形明雙非契中,是知實相等,皆如來行。」〔T35n1735 0881b15〕法藏:「二此法界無形喻,喻佛體無限礙行。」〔T35n1733 0412b26〕

(三) 鳥飛虛空喻——「佛子!譬如鳥飛虛空,經於百年,已經過處、未經過處皆不可量。何以故?虛空界無邊際故。」〔T10n0279 0274b22〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕:

  • 喻依:鳥飛虛空經百年,所經與未經之處皆不可量,以虛空無邊際故。
  • 喻體:設人經百千億那由他劫分別演說如來行,已說未說皆不可量,以如來行無邊際故。
  • 所顯義:澄觀繫此喻於真如行之下,釋非量之義——「三舉鳥飛虛空喻,釋非量義。非量有二:一行廣無量故,云如來行無邊際故;二即事同真便無分量,故以空喻。」〔T35n1735 0881b16〕法藏則繫此喻於無礙行之下:「三飛鳥翔空喻,喻佛圓無分齊行。」〔T35n1733 0412b27〕

(四) 金翅鳥王闢海喻——「佛子!譬如金翅鳥王,飛行虛空,迴翔不去,以清淨眼觀察海內諸龍宮殿,奮勇猛力,以左右翅鼓揚海水悉令兩闢,知龍男女命將盡者而搏取之。」〔T10n0279 0274b29〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕:

  • 喻依:鳥王住空迴翔,以淨眼觀海內龍宮,以兩翅闢水,取命將盡之龍男女。
  • 喻體:如來住無礙行,以淨佛眼觀法界諸宮殿中一切眾生,於曾種善根已成熟者,奮勇猛十力,以止觀兩翅鼓揚生死大愛水海,兩闢而撮取之,置佛法中。
  • 所顯義:澄觀判為「初金翅闢海喻,喻即智之悲」〔T35n1735 0881b27〕;法藏判為「四金翅搏海喻。喻佛勝用濟生行。」〔T35n1733 0412b28〕

(五) 日月無思喻——「佛子!譬如日月,獨無等侶,周行虛空,利益眾生,不作是念:『我從何來,而至何所。』」〔T10n0279 0274c09〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕:

  • 喻依:日月獨行虛空,利益眾生而不起來去之念。
  • 喻體:諸佛性本寂滅、無有分別,示現遊行一切法界,作諸佛事無有休息,而不生「我從彼來,而向彼去」〔T10n0279 0274c13〕之戲論分別。
  • 所顯義:澄觀判為「後日月無思喻,喻悲不失智」〔T35n1735 0881b27〕;法藏判為「五日月行空喻。喻佛無功成事行。」〔T35n1733 0412b28〕

(六) 二行之互成——澄觀於雙標處以四重釋二行之相待:

「今初,義有多含:一無礙行者,即理之事行。真如行者,即事之理行。前即行相,後即行體。又前是即智之悲,後是即悲之智。前即真之俗,後即俗之真,融而無礙為如來行。」〔T35n1735 0881b07〕

(七) 終日行而未曾行——澄觀於雙非之下著一結語:

「雙非永寂,為如來行,故心彌虛、行彌曠,終日行而未曾行。」〔T35n1735 0881b20〕

澄觀於此引《涅槃》為證:

「復有一行是如來行,所謂大乘大般涅槃。」〔T35n1735 0881b22〕


四、異譯對勘

本義之漢譯校本:實叉難陀 T279(底本·〈如來出現品第三十七〉第六義)· 佛馱跋陀羅 T278(晉譯六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品第三十二〉之三〔T09n0278 0626a15〕起–〔0626c09〕前訖)。本義無別行經、無牒經論釋〔查無〕。以下逐句全錄不判。

句一 徵問與雙標二行

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺行?佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應知無礙行是如來行,應知真如行是如來行。T10n0279 0274b17
佛馱 T278覺行?此菩薩摩訶薩知、見如來無礙行、如如行T09n0278 0626a16

異文所繫:(甲) 80「真如行」↔ 60「如如行」。(乙) 80 以『應知某行是如來行』之句重言標舉,60 作「知、見如來無礙行、如如行」〔T09n0278 0626a16〕一句總收。(丙) 80 之佛號作「如來、應、正等覺」,60 作「如來、應供、等正覺」。

句二 真如絕三際

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如真如,前際不生,後際不動,現在不起;如來行亦如是,不生、不動、不起。T10n0279 0274b
佛馱 T278是如來行如如,過去不滅,未來不至,現在不起,如來行亦如是,不滅、不至、不起。T09n0278 0626a17

異文所繫:80 作「不生、不動、不起」,60 作「不滅、不至、不起」——三際之表法用詞異;80 以前際·後際·現在立名,60 以過去·未來·現在立名。

句三 法界無形

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如法界,非量、非無量,無形故;如來行亦如是,非量、非無量,無形故。T10n0279 0274b
佛馱 T278譬如法界無量無縛。何以故?法界無身故。如來行亦如是,無量無縛。何以故?如來行無身故。T09n0278 0626a19

異文所繫:80 作雙非句式「非量、非無量」,60 作「無量無縛」之表詮句式;80 之所以然作「無形故」,60 作「無身故」。

句四 鳥飛虛空喻

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279譬如鳥飛虛空,經於百年,已經過處、未經過處皆不可量。何以故?虛空界無邊際故。T10n0279 0274b
佛馱 T278譬如鳥飛虛空,經百千年所遊行處不可度量;未遊行處亦不可量。何以故?虛空無分齊故。T09n0278 0626a21

異文所繫:80 作「經於百年」,60 作「經百千年」;80「虛空界無邊際」↔ 60「虛空無分齊」。

句五 演說之校量

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279假使有人經百千億那由他劫分別演說,已說、未說皆不可量。何以故?如來行無邊際故。T10n0279 0274b
佛馱 T278若使有人於百千億那由他劫,分別解說如來之行;已解說者不可限量,未解說者亦不可量。何以故?如來行無分齊故。T09n0278 0626a24

異文所繫:80「分別演說」↔ 60「分別解說」;80「無邊際」↔ 60「無分齊」。

句六 無住而示現

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如來、應、正等覺住無礙行,無有住處,而能普為一切眾生示現所行,令其見已,出過一切諸障礙道。T10n0279 0274b
佛馱 T278如來、應供、等正覺,住如來住,無所住故;而能普為一切眾生,示現開導如來之行,眾生見已出過一切諸障礙道。T09n0278 0626a27

異文所繫:80 作「住無礙行,無有住處」〔T10n0279 0274b27〕,60 作「住如來住,無所住故」〔T09n0278 0626a28〕;80「示現所行」↔ 60「示現開導如來之行」〔T09n0278 0626a29〕。

句七 金翅鳥王喻之喻依

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279譬如金翅鳥王,飛行虛空,迴翔不去,以清淨眼觀察海內諸龍宮殿,奮勇猛力,以左右翅鼓揚海水悉令兩闢,知龍男女命將盡者而搏取之。T10n0279 0274b
佛馱 T278譬如金翅鳥王,飛行虛空,安住虛空,以清淨眼觀察大海龍王宮殿,奮勇猛力,以左右翅博開海水,悉令兩闢,知龍男女有命盡者,而撮取之。T09n0278 0626b01

異文所繫:80「迴翔不去」↔ 60「安住虛空」;80「鼓揚海水」↔ 60「博開海水」。

句八 金翅鳥王喻之法合

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279住無礙行,以淨佛眼觀察法界諸宮殿中一切眾生,若曾種善根已成熟者,如來奮勇猛十力,以止觀兩翅鼓揚生死大愛水海,使其兩闢而撮取之,置佛法中,令斷一切妄想戲論,安住如來無分別無礙行。T10n0279 0274b
佛馱 T278安住無礙虛空之中,以清淨眼觀察法界諸宮殿中一切眾生,若有善根已成熟者,奮勇猛十力、止觀兩翅,博開生死大愛海水,隨其所應出生死海,除滅一切妄想顛倒,安立如來無礙之行。T09n0278 0626b05

異文所繫:(甲) 80「住無礙行」↔ 60「安住無礙虛空之中」〔T09n0278 0626b05〕。(乙) 80 有「若曾種善根已成熟者」〔T10n0279 0274c05〕之「曾種」,60 作「若有善根已成熟者」〔T09n0278 0626b07〕。(丙) 80 作「置佛法中,令斷一切妄想戲論」〔T10n0279 0274c08〕,60 作「隨其所應出生死海,除滅一切妄想顛倒」〔T09n0278 0626b08〕。(丁) 80 結作「安住如來無分別無礙行」〔T10n0279 0274c08〕,60 作「安立如來無礙之行」〔T09n0278 0626b09〕——80 多「無分別」一目。

句九 日月無思喻

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279譬如日月,獨無等侶,周行虛空,利益眾生,不作是念:『我從何來,而至何所。』諸佛如來亦復如是,性本寂滅,無有分別,示現遊行一切法界,為欲饒益諸眾生故,作諸佛事無有休息,不生如是戲論分別:『我從彼來,而向彼去。』T10n0279 0274c
佛馱 T278譬如日月周行虛空,不作是念:『我行虛空從何所來?去至何所?』如來亦復如是,周行無礙解脫虛空,分別一切法界,饒益一切眾生,廣作佛事,如來不作是念:『我有去來。』T09n0278 0626b10

異文所繫:(甲) 80 有「獨無等侶」「利益眾生」二語,60 無。(乙) 80 合語作「性本寂滅,無有分別」〔T10n0279 0274c11〕,60 作「周行無礙解脫虛空,分別一切法界」〔T09n0278 0626b12〕——80 就體之寂滅說,60 就用之周行說。(丙) 80「作諸佛事無有休息」〔T10n0279 0274c13〕↔ 60「廣作佛事」。

句十 結勸

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應以如是等無量方便、無量性相,知見如來、應、正等覺所行之行。T10n0279 0274c
佛馱 T278佛子!菩薩摩訶薩以如是等無量無邊勝行,知、見如來、應供、等正覺行。T09n0278 0626b14

異文所繫:80 作「無量方便、無量性相」〔T10n0279 0274c15〕二目,60 作「無量無邊勝行」一目。

句十一 重頌之數與首偈

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279譬如真如不生滅,無有方所無能見;大饒益者行如是,出過三世不可量。T10n0279 0274c
佛馱 T278譬如如無盡,無生亦無滅,亦無有方處,求之不可見。T09n0278 0626b18

異文所繫:80 之頌為七言五偈,60 之頌為五言十偈——句式與偈數皆異;澄觀依八十本判「五偈」,法藏依六十本判「十偈頌五喻。各二頌」〔T35n1733 0412c01〕。


五、宗義之經據〔眼〕

(一) 二行即體相之互成——「應知無礙行是如來行,應知真如行是如來行」〔T10n0279 0274b18〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕。澄觀之四重釋為本義宗眼所在:

「一無礙行者,即理之事行。真如行者,即事之理行。前即行相,後即行體。又前是即智之悲,後是即悲之智。前即真之俗,後即俗之真,融而無礙為如來行。」〔T35n1735 0881b07〕

理事之無礙不在二行之外別立,而即在二行之相即——此為華嚴宗理事無礙一門之品內經據。

(二) 無住而普示所行——「如來、應、正等覺住無礙行,無有住處,而能普為一切眾生示現所行」〔T10n0279 0274b27〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕。澄觀釋此為悲智不二:

「智無所住,悲示所行,即悲智無礙,自無二礙、令他無礙,皆無礙行也。」〔T35n1735 0881b25〕

無住是智邊,示現是悲邊;自身無礙復令他無礙,方名無礙行。

(三) 雙非之非量——「如法界,非量、非無量,無形故」〔T10n0279 0274b21〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕。澄觀:

「既無有量,何有無量?若謂無量,即是量故。雙非永寂,為如來行,故心彌虛、行彌曠,終日行而未曾行。」〔T35n1735 0881b19〕

無量若立為一相,即又落於量——故須雙非。「終日行而未曾行」一語,即本義之行相所歸。

(四) 性起行——法藏標本義之科逕作「性起行」,並繫之於前義之境:

「第六性起行者,前明智所依境,今辨依境所成之行,故次明也。」〔T35n1733 0412b17〕

行非別起,即依所證之境而成——此與前義『智海從往昔大願生起』一句相承(澄觀語)。

(五) 止觀兩翅拔濟已熟之機——「若曾種善根已成熟者,如來奮勇猛十力,以止觀兩翅鼓揚生死大愛水海」〔T10n0279 0274c05〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕。法藏判此喻為「佛勝用濟生行」〔T35n1733 0412b28〕,澄觀判為「喻即智之悲」〔T35n1735 0881b27〕——佛之拔濟有其所待之機(曾種善根已成熟),非漫然普攝。


六、諸家異釋(古德·標宗)

澄觀《華嚴經疏》T35n1735(八十華嚴逐文·主)

來意與長行之分:

「第六出現之行。前明分齊境智無邊,今彰運用則悲智無盡,雖智海已滿,悲無息故。長行中二:先標舉、後釋相。釋相中三:初雙標二行、次雙釋二行、後雙結二行。」〔T35n1735 0881b03〕

二行之四重釋:

「今初,義有多含:一無礙行者,即理之事行。真如行者,即事之理行。前即行相,後即行體。又前是即智之悲,後是即悲之智。前即真之俗,後即俗之真,融而無礙為如來行。」〔T35n1735 0881b07〕

真如行三節:

「今初,真如之名,言含法喻。文中有三:初牒名以解,明體絕三際,故同真如。契如成行,行即如也。過未非緣,故不生不動;現在離緣,故非起也。二復舉法界無形明雙非契中,是知實相等,皆如來行。三舉鳥飛虛空喻,釋非量義。」〔T35n1735 0881b12〕

無礙行法喻二分與二喻之配:

「文中二:先約法總明、後以喻別顯。今初。智無所住,悲示所行,即悲智無礙,自無二礙、令他無礙,皆無礙行也。二別以喻顯中二喻:初金翅闢海喻,喻即智之悲;後日月無思喻,喻悲不失智。」〔T35n1735 0881b24〕

雙結:「性結真如,相結無礙。」〔T35n1735 0881b29〕

法藏《探玄記》T35n1733(六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品〉疏)

科名與長行三分:

「第六性起行者,前明智所依境,今辨依境所成之行,故次明也。就辨釋中,長行內三,謂標、釋、結。初中標二行。」〔T35n1733 0412b17〕

二行之三家釋(古人釋·今更釋·又釋):

「古人釋:無礙行者,明俗諦行。二如如行者,明真諦行。今更釋:初是會事同理,理不礙事,是無礙行;二事盡理現,名如如行。又釋:初是量智,於外事用無礙;二是理智,內證如如也。」〔T35n1733 0412b20〕

五喻之配屬:

「釋中有五喻:一真無遷變喻,喻佛至絕三際行,即釋如如行也。下四釋無礙行。二此法界無形喻,喻佛體無限礙行。三飛鳥翔空喻,喻佛圓無分齊行。四金翅搏海喻。喻佛勝用濟生行。五日月行空喻。喻佛無功成事行。皆以後釋前可知。」〔T35n1733 0412b24〕

結與頌科:「三結文可知。頌中十偈頌五喻。」〔T35n1733 0412c01〕

李通玄《新華嚴經論》T36n1739

本義專屬科段未見(全書「如來出現品」之命中皆他章引證散句,非本義專科)——〔查無〕。

澄觀《隨疏演義鈔》T36n1736

本範圍內未見獨立標題科起——〔查無〕。

誌錄不判:二行之釋,澄觀作四重相待(理之事行·事之理行/行相·行體/即智之悲·即悲之智/即真之俗·即俗之真),法藏出三家(古人釋以俗諦真諦分之·今更釋以會事同理與事盡理現分之·又釋以量智理智分之)。喻之配屬,澄觀以真如絕三際·法界無形·鳥飛虛空三節屬真如行,以金翅·日月二喻屬無礙行;法藏則以真無遷變一喻屬如如行,餘四喻(法界無形·飛鳥翔空·金翅搏海·日月行空)俱屬無礙行——法界無形與鳥飛二節之歸屬,二家判異。頌數之判,澄觀依八十本,其文為七言五偈;法藏依六十本作「十偈頌五喻。各二頌」〔T35n1733 0412c01〕。四重釋與三家釋孰為正詮、法界無形與鳥飛二節當屬真如行抑屬無礙行、二本頌數之開合——古有異說,誌錄之,不判。


七、互讀·承衍

  • 六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品〉〔T09n0278 0626a15–0626c09 前〕:本義之異譯全本,場景結構全同(二行總標·真如絕三際·法界無形·鳥飛虛空·無住示現·金翅鳥王闢海·日月無思·結勸·重頌),喻序一致,逐句對勘見目四。
  • 前義『出現之境界』〔T10n0279 0273c06–0274b17 前〕:澄觀與法藏皆以境行相繫立本義之來意——「前明智所依境,今辨依境所成之行」〔T35n1733 0412b18〕;讀本義當與前義合看。
  • 華嚴宗理事無礙義:澄觀以「即理之事行」「即事之理行」釋二行,並以「融而無礙為如來行」〔T35n1735 0881b10〕收之——澄觀於此段釋理事無礙。
  • 《大般涅槃經》:澄觀於雙非之下引之為證——「復有一行是如來行,所謂大乘大般涅槃。」〔T35n1735 0881b22〕本義所繫者,唯澄觀之引,非本經文。
  • 《大乘起信論》T32n1666:以「無礙行」「性起」檢之,0 命中——〔查無〕。
  • 法藏《華嚴一乘教義分齊章》T45n1866:以「如來行」「無礙行」檢其性起品引句群,0 命中——〔查無〕。
  • 承衍論(成唯識論 T31n1585 · 攝大乘論 T31n1594 · 瑜伽師地論 T30n1579):以「金翅鳥王」「無礙行」「真如行」檢之,0 命中——〔查無〕。本義無唯識軸承衍之直接牒文,據實標闕,不以他處之文充之。

八、校本定位

  • 實叉 T279(底本):品三十七〈如來出現品〉第六義 出現之行〔T10n0279 0274b17〕起–〔0274c28〕前訖(第七會 重會普光明殿)。段序:徵問與雙標二行〔0274b〕· 真如絕三際〔0274b〕· 法界無形〔0274b〕· 鳥飛虛空喻與演說校量〔0274b〕· 無住而示現〔0274b〕· 金翅鳥王喻與法合〔0274b〕· 日月無思喻〔0274c〕· 結勸〔0274c〕· 重頌五偈〔0274c〕。 〔誌錄·出處粒度〕本義 80 本逐句繫行級出處;未能唯一定位者以欄級出處標之。
  • 佛馱 T278(晉譯主對校):〈寶王如來性起品第三十二〉之三〔T09n0278 0626a15〕起–〔0626c09〕前訖。二行總標 0626a16 · 真如絕三際 0626a17 · 法界無身 0626a19 · 鳥飛虛空 0626a21 · 演說校量 0626a24 · 無住示現 0626a27 · 金翅鳥王喻 0626b01 · 法合 0626b05 · 日月喻 0626b10 · 結勸 0626b14 · 重頌起 0626b16(首偈 0626b18 · 金翅頌 0626c01 · 日月頌 0626c05 · 頌訖 0626c09 前)。
  • 澄觀《疏》T35n1735:第六出現之行 0881b03 起–0881c01 前訖。來意與長行之分 0881b03 · 二行四重釋 0881b07 · 雙釋科 0881b11 · 真如行三節 0881b12 · 法界無形 0881b15 · 鳥飛喻與非量二義 0881b17 · 雙非結語 0881b20 ·《涅槃》引證 0881b22 · 無礙行科 0881b23 · 法總明 0881b24 · 二喻別顯 0881b26 · 雙結 0881b28。《鈔》T36n1736:本範圍獨立科起〔查無〕。
  • 法藏《探玄記》T35n1733:第六性起行 0412b17 起–0412c02 前訖。科名與來意 0412b17 · 長行三分與標二行 0412b19 · 古人釋 0412b20 · 今更釋 0412b21 · 又釋 0412b23 · 五喻配屬 0412b24 · 結與頌科 0412c01。
  • 李通玄《論》T36n1739:本義專屬科段〔查無〕。
  • 異讀:本單元 T279 範圍〔0274b17〕–〔0274c27〕內大正校記 1 條,逐條照錄不判(底本【大】|他本異讀;多本異讀以/分列):〔0274b20〕起【大】|現【聖】。

The sixth sense, ‘the practice of the appearance,’ = Samantabhadra’s answer to 「菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺行」 tr. “How should a bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the practice of the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One?” 〔T10n0279 0274b17〕. First the two practices are set up in a pair — the unobstructed practice · the practice of suchness; then they are explained by five matters (suchness cutting off the three limits of time · the Dharma realm being neither measured nor measureless and having no form · the bird flying in space · the king of the golden-winged birds parting the sea · the sun and moon traveling everywhere without thought); at the end there is a double conclusion with an exhortation to know and to see, and after that five verses in repetition. Chengguan’s outline reads 「先標舉、後釋相」 tr. “first the raising and setting up, afterward the explanation of the characteristics” , and he judges the two practices to be 「前即真之俗,後即俗之真,融而無礙為如來行」 tr. “the former is the conventional that is identical with the true, the latter the true that is identical with the conventional; and their fusing without obstruction is the practice of the Tathāgata” 〔T35n1735 0881b09〕; Fazang names this sense in his outline straightforwardly as 「性起行」 tr. “the practice of nature-arising” , divides the prose section into the three parts of setting up · explaining · concluding, and within the explanation opens out five similes. The two masters differ in how they apportion the similes and in how they divide the number of verses — Chengguan, following the eighty-fascicle text, makes five verses; Fazang, following the sixty-fascicle text, makes ten.


I. Doctrinal Outline and Placement

Outline systemThe place of this sense within it
The base text T279, in thirty-nine chaptersChapter 37, The Appearance of the Tathāgata (the seventh assembly, the second gathering in the Hall of Universal Light) · the sixth sense, the practice of the appearance, from 〔T10n0279 0274b17〕 to 〔0274c28〕 exclusive
Chengguan, Huayan jing shuThe sixth, the practice of the appearance, from 〔T35n1735 0881b03〕 to 〔0881c01〕 exclusive; the prose section divides in two = the raising and setting up · the explanation of the characteristics, and within the explanation of the characteristics there are three = the paired setting up of the two practices · the paired explanation of the two practices · the paired conclusion of the two practices
Chengguan, Yanyi chaoWithin this range no independent heading of the outline is found (the subcommentary annotates the commentary phrase by phrase and does not match it clause for clause) 〔not found〕
Fazang, Tanxuan ji (the commentary on the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka, the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata)The sixth, the practice of nature-arising, from 〔T35n1733 0412b17〕 to 〔0412c02〕 exclusive; within the prose section there are three = setting up · explaining · concluding, and within the explanation there are five similes
Li Tongxuan, Xin Huayan jing lunNo section of the outline dedicated to this sense, with its own beginning and end, is found (throughout the work, the hits for 「如來出現品」 tr. “The Appearance of the Tathāgata” are all scattered citations adduced in other chapters) 〔not found〕

The reason for its coming — Chengguan ties this sixth sense to the fifth sense before it, ‘the realm of the appearance,’ making clear that from the realm the practice is accomplished:

「第六出現之行。前明分齊境智無邊,今彰運用則悲智無盡,雖智海已滿,悲無息故。」 tr. “The sixth, the practice of the appearance. What was set forth earlier was the measure of the realm and the boundlessness of wisdom; now what is made manifest is the functioning, and there compassion and wisdom are inexhaustible — for though the ocean of wisdom is already full, compassion does not rest.” 〔T35n1735 0881b03〕

Fazang ties it in the same manner, while naming it 「性起行」 tr. “the practice of nature-arising”:

「第六性起行者,前明智所依境,今辨依境所成之行,故次明也。」 tr. “As for the sixth, the practice of nature-arising: earlier what was set forth was the realm upon which wisdom depends; now what is discerned is the practice accomplished in dependence upon that realm, and therefore it is set forth next.” 〔T35n1733 0412b17〕

The division of the prose section — Chengguan divides it in two, and within the explanation of the characteristics there are three:

「長行中二:先標舉、後釋相。釋相中三:初雙標二行、次雙釋二行、後雙結二行。」 tr. “Within the prose section there are two: first the raising and setting up, afterward the explanation of the characteristics. Within the explanation of the characteristics there are three: first the paired setting up of the two practices, next the paired explanation of the two practices, last the paired conclusion of the two practices.” 〔T35n1735 0881b05〕

Fazang divides it in three:

「就辨釋中,長行內三,謂標、釋、結。初中標二行。」 tr. “As for the discerning explanation, within the prose section there are three, namely setting up, explaining, and concluding. In the first of these, the two practices are set up.” 〔T35n1733 0412b19〕

The inner outline of the explanatory section — in the paired explanation Chengguan takes the practice of suchness first and the unobstructed practice afterward:

「先釋真如行、後釋無礙行。」 tr. “First the practice of suchness is explained, afterward the unobstructed practice.” 〔T35n1735 0881b11〕

Three sections stand under the practice of suchness:

「今初,真如之名,言含法喻。文中有三:初牒名以解,明體絕三際,故同真如。契如成行,行即如也。過未非緣,故不生不動;現在離緣,故非起也。」 tr. “Now the first: the name suchness, in what it says, contains both the dharma and the simile. Within the text there are three. First, the name is taken up and explained: this makes clear that its substance cuts off the three limits of time, and therefore it is the same as suchness. Tallying with suchness, practice is accomplished, and the practice is itself suchness. Past and future are not its conditions, and therefore it is unborn and unmoving; the present is apart from conditions, and therefore it does not arise.” 〔T35n1735 0881b12〕

Under the unobstructed practice there is a division into dharma and simile:

「文中二:先約法總明、後以喻別顯。」 tr. “Within the text there are two: first it is set forth in general with respect to dharma, afterward it is shown in particular by way of simile.” 〔T35n1735 0881b24〕

「二別以喻顯中二喻:初金翅闢海喻,喻即智之悲;後日月無思喻,喻悲不失智。」 tr. “Second, within the showing in particular by way of simile there are two similes: the first, the simile of the golden-winged bird parting the sea, figures the compassion that is identical with wisdom; the latter, the simile of the sun and moon without thought, figures the compassion that does not lose wisdom.” 〔T35n1735 0881b26〕

The concluding part — Chengguan: 「性結真如,相結無礙。」 tr. “Nature concludes suchness, characteristic concludes the unobstructed.” 〔T35n1735 0881b29〕 Fazang: 「三結文可知。」 tr. “Third, the concluding text can be understood as it stands.” 〔T35n1733 0412c01〕


II. Terminology

TermAttestationEssential sense
the unobstructed practicethis sense: 「應知無礙行是如來行」 tr. “one should know that the unobstructed practice is the practice of the Tathāgata” 〔T10n0279 0274b18〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕The first of the two practices; Chengguan: 「一無礙行者,即理之事行。」 tr. “First, the unobstructed practice is the practice of phenomena that is identical with principle.” 〔T35n1735 0881b07〕 Fazang’s further explanation: 「初是會事同理,理不礙事,是無礙行」 tr. “the first is the gathering of phenomena into sameness with principle, principle not obstructing phenomena, and this is the unobstructed practice” 〔T35n1733 0412b21〕
the practice of suchnessthis sense: 「應知真如行是如來行」 tr. “one should know that the practice of suchness is the practice of the Tathāgata” 〔T10n0279 0274b19〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕The second of the two practices; Chengguan: 「真如行者,即事之理行。」 tr. “The practice of suchness is the practice of principle that is identical with phenomena.” 〔T35n1735 0881b08〕 The sixty-fascicle text has 「如如行」 tr. “the practice of thusness” 〔T09n0278 0626a16〕
in the prior limit not born · in the later limit not moved · in the present not arisenthis sense: 「如真如,前際不生,後際不動,現在不起」 tr. “it is like suchness: in the prior limit it has not been born, in the later limit it will not move, and in the present it does not arise” 〔T10n0279 0274b19〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕The way of showing that all three limits of time are alike cut off; Chengguan: 「明體絕三際,故同真如……過未非緣,故不生不動;現在離緣,故非起也。」 tr. “this makes clear that its substance cuts off the three limits of time, and therefore it is the same as suchness … past and future are not its conditions, and therefore it is unborn and unmoving; the present is apart from conditions, and therefore it does not arise.” 〔T35n1735 0881b13〕
not measured · not measurelessthis sense: 「如法界,非量、非無量,無形故」 tr. “it is like the Dharma realm: it is not measured, it is not measureless, because it has no form” 〔T10n0279 0274b21〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕The clause of double negation; Chengguan: 「既無有量,何有無量?若謂無量,即是量故。」 tr. “Since there is no measure, how could there be the measureless? For if one calls it measureless, that is precisely a measure.” 〔T35n1735 0881b19〕
the king of the golden-winged birdsthis sense: 「譬如金翅鳥王,飛行虛空」 tr. “it is like the king of the golden-winged birds, flying through space” 〔T10n0279 0274b29〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕The vehicle of the simile; a king of birds that feeds on dragons, used by the sūtra to figure the Buddha’s valiant drawing forth and rescuing
the two wings of calming and contemplationthis sense: 「以止觀兩翅鼓揚生死大愛水海」 tr. “with the two wings of calming and contemplation he beats up the great sea of the water of craving that is birth-and-death” 〔T10n0279 0274c06〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕The pivot where the simile is matched to the dharma: calming and contemplation, the two dharmas, serve as the bird’s left and right wings
the great sea of the water of craving that is birth-and-deaththis sense: 「鼓揚生死大愛水海,使其兩闢而撮取之」 tr. “he beats up the great sea of the water of craving that is birth-and-death, makes it part on both sides, and seizes them up” 〔T10n0279 0274c07〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕The sea that is parted; the sixty-fascicle text has 「生死大愛海水」 tr. “the water of the great sea of craving that is birth-and-death” 〔T09n0278 0626b08〕
false conceiving and frivolous talkthis sense: 「令斷一切妄想戲論,安住如來無分別無礙行」 tr. “causing them to cut off all false conceiving and frivolous talk and to dwell in that unobstructed practice of the Tathāgata in which there is no discrimination” 〔T10n0279 0274c08〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕The delusion that is cut off; the sixty-fascicle text has 「除滅一切妄想顛倒」 tr. “doing away with all false conceiving and inversion” 〔T09n0278 0626b09〕
alone and without companion equal to themthis sense: 「譬如日月,獨無等侶,周行虛空」 tr. “it is like the sun and the moon: alone and without companion equal to them, they go everywhere throughout space” 〔T10n0279 0274c09〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕A phrase belonging to the vehicle of the simile of the sun and moon; the eighty-fascicle text alone has it, and the sixty-fascicle text has no such four graphs
their nature is from the first quiescentthis sense: 「諸佛如來亦復如是,性本寂滅,無有分別」 tr. “so it is with the buddhas, the tathāgatas: their nature is from the first quiescent and there is no discrimination in it” 〔T10n0279 0274c11〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕The phrase matching the simile of the sun and moon to the dharma; it shows the accomplishing of affairs without thought
measureless means · measureless natures and characteristicsthis sense: 「應以如是等無量方便、無量性相,知見如來、應、正等覺所行之行」 tr. “he should use measureless means such as these, and measureless natures and characteristics, to know and to see the practice that the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One practices” 〔T10n0279 0274c14〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕The words of the concluding exhortation; the sixty-fascicle text has 「以如是等無量無邊勝行」 tr. “by measureless and boundless surpassing practices such as these” 〔T09n0278 0626b15〕

III. Similes and Rhetoric

(1) The simile of suchness cutting off the three limits of time — 「佛子!如真如,前際不生,後際不動,現在不起;如來行亦如是,不生、不動、不起。」 tr. “Sons of the Buddha! It is like suchness: in the prior limit it has not been born, in the later limit it will not move, and in the present it does not arise; so it is with the practice of the Tathāgata — not born, not moved, not arisen.” 〔T10n0279 0274b19〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕:

  • The vehicle of the simile: suchness is unborn in the prior limit, unmoving in the later limit, and does not arise in the present.
  • What it figures: the practice of the Tathāgata likewise is not born, not moved, not arisen.
  • The meaning shown: Chengguan judges this to be the first section of the practice of suchness, 「契如成行,行即如也」 tr. “tallying with suchness, practice is accomplished, and the practice is itself suchness” 〔T35n1735 0881b14〕. Fazang for his part lists it as the first of five similes: 「一真無遷變喻,喻佛至絕三際行,即釋如如行也。」 tr. “First, the simile of the true that does not shift or alter, figuring the Buddha’s practice that reaches to the cutting off of the three limits of time; this is the explanation of the practice of thusness.” 〔T35n1733 0412b24〕

(2) The simile of the Dharma realm having no form — 「佛子!如法界,非量、非無量,無形故;如來行亦如是,非量、非無量,無形故。」 tr. “Sons of the Buddha! It is like the Dharma realm: it is not measured, it is not measureless, because it has no form; so it is with the practice of the Tathāgata — it is not measured, it is not measureless, because it has no form.” 〔T10n0279 0274b21〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕:

  • The vehicle of the simile: the Dharma realm has no form, and therefore it is neither measured nor measureless.
  • What it figures: the practice of the Tathāgata likewise is neither measured nor measureless and has no form.
  • The meaning shown: Chengguan: 「二復舉法界無形明雙非契中,是知實相等,皆如來行。」 tr. “Second, he further raises the formlessness of the Dharma realm to make clear that the double negation tallies with the middle; from which one knows that true reality and the like are all the practice of the Tathāgata.” 〔T35n1735 0881b15〕 Fazang: 「二此法界無形喻,喻佛體無限礙行。」 tr. “Second, this simile of the Dharma realm having no form figures the Buddha’s practice whose substance has no limit or obstruction.” 〔T35n1733 0412b26〕

(3) The simile of the bird flying in space — 「佛子!譬如鳥飛虛空,經於百年,已經過處、未經過處皆不可量。何以故?虛空界無邊際故。」 tr. “Sons of the Buddha! It is like a bird flying in space: though it fly for a hundred years, neither the region it has already passed through nor the region it has not yet passed through can be measured. Why is this? Because the realm of space has no bound.” 〔T10n0279 0274b22〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕:

  • The vehicle of the simile: a bird flies in space for a hundred years, and neither the regions it has passed through nor those it has not can be measured, because space has no bound.
  • What it figures: were a person to spend a hundred thousand koṭis of nayutas of kalpas explaining the practice of the Tathāgata distinctly, what has been said and what has not been said alike could not be measured, because the practice of the Tathāgata has no bound.
  • The meaning shown: Chengguan ties this simile beneath the practice of suchness and explains the sense of “not measured” — 「三舉鳥飛虛空喻,釋非量義。非量有二:一行廣無量故,云如來行無邊際故;二即事同真便無分量,故以空喻。」 tr. “Third, he raises the simile of the bird flying in space in order to explain the sense of not being measured. Not being measured has two senses: first, because the practice is vast and measureless, it says that the practice of the Tathāgata has no bound; second, phenomena being identical with the true, there is simply no quantity, and therefore space is used as the simile.” 〔T35n1735 0881b16〕 Fazang, however, ties this simile beneath the unobstructed practice: 「三飛鳥翔空喻,喻佛圓無分齊行。」 tr. “Third, the simile of the flying bird soaring in space figures the Buddha’s practice that is perfect and without demarcation.” 〔T35n1733 0412b27〕

(4) The simile of the king of the golden-winged birds parting the sea — 「佛子!譬如金翅鳥王,飛行虛空,迴翔不去,以清淨眼觀察海內諸龍宮殿,奮勇猛力,以左右翅鼓揚海水悉令兩闢,知龍男女命將盡者而搏取之。」 tr. “Sons of the Buddha! It is like the king of the golden-winged birds: flying through space, he wheels and circles and does not go away; with pure eyes he watches the palaces of the dragons throughout the sea; he rouses his valiant strength, and with his left and right wings he beats up the sea water and makes it part wholly on both sides; and knowing which of the dragon males and females are about to come to the end of their lives, he seizes them and bears them up.” 〔T10n0279 0274b29〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕:

  • The vehicle of the simile: the bird king dwells in space and wheels there, with pure eyes watches the dragon palaces within the sea, parts the water with his two wings, and takes the dragon males and females whose lives are about to end.
  • What it figures: the Tathāgata dwells in the unobstructed practice, with the pure buddha-eye watches all the sentient beings in the palaces throughout the Dharma realm, and for those who have planted roots of goodness in the past and have already ripened he rouses his valiant ten powers, with the two wings of calming and contemplation beats up the great sea of the water of craving that is birth-and-death, makes it part on both sides, seizes them up, and sets them within the Buddha’s Dharma.
  • The meaning shown: Chengguan judges it to be 「初金翅闢海喻,喻即智之悲」 tr. “the first, the simile of the golden-winged bird parting the sea, figuring the compassion that is identical with wisdom” 〔T35n1735 0881b27〕; Fazang judges it to be 「四金翅搏海喻。喻佛勝用濟生行。」 tr. “Fourth, the simile of the golden-winged bird seizing through the sea. It figures the Buddha’s practice of surpassing function that rescues the living.” 〔T35n1733 0412b28〕

(5) The simile of the sun and moon without thought — 「佛子!譬如日月,獨無等侶,周行虛空,利益眾生,不作是念:『我從何來,而至何所。』」 tr. “Sons of the Buddha! It is like the sun and the moon: alone and without companion equal to them, they go everywhere throughout space and benefit sentient beings, and they do not frame a thought like this: ‘Where have I come from, and where am I going?’” 〔T10n0279 0274c09〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕:

  • The vehicle of the simile: the sun and moon travel space alone, benefiting sentient beings and yet giving rise to no thought of coming or going.
  • What it figures: the buddhas, whose nature is from the first quiescent and without discrimination, manifest themselves as journeying through the whole Dharma realm and do all manner of buddha-work without rest, and yet do not give rise to the frivolous, discriminating thought 「我從彼來,而向彼去」 tr. “I have come from over there, and I am going toward over there” 〔T10n0279 0274c13〕.
  • The meaning shown: Chengguan judges it to be 「後日月無思喻,喻悲不失智」 tr. “the latter, the simile of the sun and moon without thought, figuring the compassion that does not lose wisdom” 〔T35n1735 0881b27〕; Fazang judges it to be 「五日月行空喻。喻佛無功成事行。」 tr. “Fifth, the simile of the sun and moon traveling in space. It figures the Buddha’s practice of accomplishing affairs without effort.” 〔T35n1733 0412b28〕

(6) The mutual completion of the two practices — at the place where they are set up in a pair Chengguan explains their reciprocity in four pairs:

「今初,義有多含:一無礙行者,即理之事行。真如行者,即事之理行。前即行相,後即行體。又前是即智之悲,後是即悲之智。前即真之俗,後即俗之真,融而無礙為如來行。」 tr. “Now the first: the meaning holds much within it. First, the unobstructed practice is the practice of phenomena that is identical with principle. The practice of suchness is the practice of principle that is identical with phenomena. The former is the characteristic of practice, the latter the substance of practice. Again, the former is the compassion that is identical with wisdom, the latter the wisdom that is identical with compassion. The former is the conventional that is identical with the true, the latter the true that is identical with the conventional; and their fusing without obstruction is the practice of the Tathāgata.” 〔T35n1735 0881b07〕

(7) Practicing all day long and yet never having practiced — beneath the double negation Chengguan sets down a summing-up:

「雙非永寂,為如來行,故心彌虛、行彌曠,終日行而未曾行。」 tr. “The double negation, everlastingly still, is the practice of the Tathāgata; therefore the more the mind is empty, the more the practice is vast — practicing all day long and yet never having practiced.” 〔T35n1735 0881b20〕

Here Chengguan cites the Nirvāṇa Sūtra for a witness:

「復有一行是如來行,所謂大乘大般涅槃。」 tr. “There is, further, one practice that is the practice of the Tathāgata, namely the great parinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle.” 〔T35n1735 0881b22〕


IV. Collation with Parallel Translations

The Chinese witnesses for this sense: Śikṣānanda, T279 (the base text; the sixth sense of the Chapter on the Appearance of the Tathāgata, chapter thirty-seven) · Buddhabhadra, T278 (the Jin translation, the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka, the third portion of the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata, chapter thirty-two, from 〔T09n0278 0626a15〕 to 〔0626c09〕 exclusive). For this sense there is no separately circulating sūtra and no treatise that takes up the sūtra text clause by clause 〔not found〕. What follows is a full record clause by clause, without adjudication.

Clause one The question raised and the paired setting up of the two practices

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279Sons of the Buddha! How should a bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the practice of the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One? Sons of the Buddha! A bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know that the unobstructed practice is the practice of the Tathāgata, and should know that the practice of suchness is the practice of the Tathāgata.T10n0279 0274b17
Buddhabhadra T278… awakened one’s practice? This bodhisattva-mahāsattva knows and sees the Tathāgata’s unobstructed practice and practice of thusnessT09n0278 0626a16

What the divergences bear upon: (a) The eighty has 「真如行」 tr. “the practice of suchness” ↔ the sixty has 「如如行」 tr. “the practice of thusness.” (b) The eighty sets the matter up by repeating the clause ‘one should know that such-and-such a practice is the practice of the Tathāgata,’ while the sixty gathers it into the single clause 「知、見如來無礙行、如如行」 tr. “knows and sees the Tathāgata’s unobstructed practice and practice of thusness” 〔T09n0278 0626a16〕. (c) The buddha-epithets of the eighty read 「如來、應、正等覺」 tr. “the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One,” while the sixty reads 「如來、應供、等正覺」 tr. “the Tathāgata, the Worthy of Offerings, the Fully and Rightly Awakened One.”

Clause two Suchness cutting off the three limits of time

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279It is like suchness: in the prior limit it has not been born, in the later limit it will not move, and in the present it does not arise; so it is with the practice of the Tathāgata — not born, not moved, not arisen.T10n0279 0274b
Buddhabhadra T278The practice of the Tathāgata is thusness: in the past it does not cease, in the future it does not arrive, in the present it does not arise; so it is with the practice of the Tathāgata — not ceasing, not arriving, not arisen.T09n0278 0626a17

What the divergences bear upon: the eighty has 「不生、不動、不起」 tr. “not born, not moved, not arisen,” the sixty has 「不滅、不至、不起」 tr. “not ceasing, not arriving, not arisen” — the wording by which the three limits of time are shown differs; the eighty sets up the names as the prior limit · the later limit · the present, while the sixty sets them up as the past · the future · the present.

Clause three The Dharma realm having no form

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279It is like the Dharma realm: it is not measured, it is not measureless, because it has no form; so it is with the practice of the Tathāgata — it is not measured, it is not measureless, because it has no form.T10n0279 0274b
Buddhabhadra T278It is like the Dharma realm, which is measureless and unbound. Why is this? Because the Dharma realm has no body. So it is with the practice of the Tathāgata, which is measureless and unbound. Why is this? Because the practice of the Tathāgata has no body.T09n0278 0626a19

What the divergences bear upon: the eighty uses the doubly negative construction 「非量、非無量」 tr. “not measured, not measureless,” while the sixty uses the affirmative construction 「無量無縛」 tr. “measureless and unbound”; the reason given in the eighty is 「無形故」 tr. “because it has no form,” and in the sixty 「無身故」 tr. “because it has no body.”

Clause four The simile of the bird flying in space

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279It is like a bird flying in space: though it fly for a hundred years, neither the region it has already passed through nor the region it has not yet passed through can be measured. Why is this? Because the realm of space has no bound.T10n0279 0274b
Buddhabhadra T278It is like a bird flying in space: though it fly for a hundred thousand years, the places it has roamed through cannot be gauged or measured, and the places it has not roamed through likewise cannot be measured. Why is this? Because space has no demarcation.T09n0278 0626a21

What the divergences bear upon: the eighty has 「經於百年」 tr. “though it fly for a hundred years,” the sixty 「經百千年」 tr. “though it fly for a hundred thousand years”; the eighty’s 「虛空界無邊際」 tr. “the realm of space has no bound” ↔ the sixty’s 「虛空無分齊」 tr. “space has no demarcation.”

Clause five The comparison drawn with expounding

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279Even were someone to spend a hundred thousand koṭis of nayutas of kalpas explaining it distinctly, what has been said and what has not been said alike could not be measured. Why is this? Because the practice of the Tathāgata has no bound.T10n0279 0274b
Buddhabhadra T278If someone were, over a hundred thousand koṭis of nayutas of kalpas, to explain the practice of the Tathāgata distinctly, what he had explained could not be limited or measured, and what he had not explained likewise could not be measured. Why is this? Because the practice of the Tathāgata has no demarcation.T09n0278 0626a24

What the divergences bear upon: the eighty’s 「分別演說」 tr. “explaining it distinctly” ↔ the sixty’s 「分別解說」 tr. “explaining and expounding it distinctly”; the eighty’s 「無邊際」 tr. “has no bound” ↔ the sixty’s 「無分齊」 tr. “has no demarcation.”

Clause six Manifesting while dwelling nowhere

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279The Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One dwells in the unobstructed practice and has no place of dwelling, and yet he is able to manifest universally to all sentient beings the practice that he practices, so that having seen it they go beyond every path of obstruction.T10n0279 0274b
Buddhabhadra T278The Tathāgata, the Worthy of Offerings, the Fully and Rightly Awakened One dwells in the dwelling of a tathāgata, because there is nothing he dwells in; and yet he is able universally, for all sentient beings, to manifest and open up the practice of the Tathāgata, and sentient beings, having seen it, go beyond every path of obstruction.T09n0278 0626a27

What the divergences bear upon: the eighty has 「住無礙行,無有住處」 tr. “dwells in the unobstructed practice and has no place of dwelling” 〔T10n0279 0274b27〕, the sixty 「住如來住,無所住故」 tr. “dwells in the dwelling of a tathāgata, because there is nothing he dwells in” 〔T09n0278 0626a28〕; the eighty’s 「示現所行」 tr. “manifest the practice that he practices” ↔ the sixty’s 「示現開導如來之行」 tr. “manifest and open up the practice of the Tathāgata” 〔T09n0278 0626a29〕.

Clause seven The vehicle of the simile of the king of the golden-winged birds

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279It is like the king of the golden-winged birds: flying through space, he wheels and circles and does not go away; with pure eyes he watches the palaces of the dragons throughout the sea; he rouses his valiant strength, and with his left and right wings he beats up the sea water and makes it part wholly on both sides; and knowing which of the dragon males and females are about to come to the end of their lives, he seizes them and bears them up.T10n0279 0274b
Buddhabhadra T278It is like the king of the golden-winged birds: flying through space, dwelling securely in space, with pure eyes he watches the palace of the dragon king in the great sea; he rouses his valiant strength, and with his left and right wings he strikes the sea water open and makes it part wholly on both sides; and knowing which of the dragon males and females have come to the end of their lives, he seizes them up.T09n0278 0626b01

What the divergences bear upon: the eighty’s 「迴翔不去」 tr. “he wheels and circles and does not go away” ↔ the sixty’s 「安住虛空」 tr. “dwelling securely in space”; the eighty’s 「鼓揚海水」 tr. “beats up the sea water” ↔ the sixty’s 「博開海水」 tr. “strikes the sea water open.”

Clause eight The matching of the simile of the king of the golden-winged birds to the dharma

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279He dwells in the unobstructed practice, and with the pure buddha-eye he watches all the sentient beings in the palaces throughout the Dharma realm; and if there are those who have planted roots of goodness in the past and have already ripened, the Tathāgata rouses his valiant ten powers and with the two wings of calming and contemplation beats up the great sea of the water of craving that is birth-and-death, makes it part on both sides and seizes them up, and sets them within the Buddha’s Dharma, causing them to cut off all false conceiving and frivolous talk and to dwell in that unobstructed practice of the Tathāgata in which there is no discrimination.T10n0279 0274b
Buddhabhadra T278Dwelling securely within the unobstructed space, with pure eyes he watches all the sentient beings in the palaces throughout the Dharma realm; and if there are those whose roots of goodness have already ripened, he rouses his valiant ten powers and the two wings of calming and contemplation, strikes open the water of the great sea of craving that is birth-and-death, and according to what befits them they come forth from the sea of birth-and-death, doing away with all false conceiving and inversion, and are established in the unobstructed practice of the Tathāgata.T09n0278 0626b05

What the divergences bear upon: (a) The eighty’s 「住無礙行」 tr. “he dwells in the unobstructed practice” ↔ the sixty’s 「安住無礙虛空之中」 tr. “dwelling securely within the unobstructed space” 〔T09n0278 0626b05〕. (b) The eighty has 「若曾種善根已成熟者」 tr. “if there are those who have planted roots of goodness in the past and have already ripened” 〔T10n0279 0274c05〕, with its 「曾種」 tr. “planted in the past,” while the sixty has 「若有善根已成熟者」 tr. “if there are those whose roots of goodness have already ripened” 〔T09n0278 0626b07〕. (c) The eighty has 「置佛法中,令斷一切妄想戲論」 tr. “sets them within the Buddha’s Dharma, causing them to cut off all false conceiving and frivolous talk” 〔T10n0279 0274c08〕, the sixty 「隨其所應出生死海,除滅一切妄想顛倒」 tr. “according to what befits them they come forth from the sea of birth-and-death, doing away with all false conceiving and inversion” 〔T09n0278 0626b08〕. (d) The eighty concludes with 「安住如來無分別無礙行」 tr. “dwell in that unobstructed practice of the Tathāgata in which there is no discrimination” 〔T10n0279 0274c08〕, the sixty with 「安立如來無礙之行」 tr. “are established in the unobstructed practice of the Tathāgata” 〔T09n0278 0626b09〕 — the eighty has the one further item 「無分別」 tr. “in which there is no discrimination.”

Clause nine The simile of the sun and moon without thought

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279It is like the sun and the moon: alone and without companion equal to them, they go everywhere throughout space and benefit sentient beings, and they do not frame a thought like this: ‘Where have I come from, and where am I going?’ So it is with the buddhas, the tathāgatas: their nature is from the first quiescent and there is no discrimination in it, and yet they manifest themselves as journeying through the whole Dharma realm, and because they wish to benefit sentient beings they do all manner of buddha-work without rest, and they do not give rise to a frivolous, discriminating thought like this: ‘I have come from over there, and I am going toward over there.’T10n0279 0274c
Buddhabhadra T278It is like the sun and moon going everywhere throughout space, and not framing a thought like this: ‘Whence have I come, traveling through space? And where am I going?’ So it is with the Tathāgata: he travels everywhere through the space of unobstructed liberation, discriminates the whole Dharma realm, benefits all sentient beings, and does buddha-work on a vast scale, and the Tathāgata does not frame a thought like this: ‘I have a going and a coming.’T09n0278 0626b10

What the divergences bear upon: (a) The eighty has the two phrases 「獨無等侶」 tr. “alone and without companion equal to them” and 「利益眾生」 tr. “benefit sentient beings,” which the sixty lacks. (b) The eighty’s phrase matching the simile to the dharma reads 「性本寂滅,無有分別」 tr. “their nature is from the first quiescent and there is no discrimination in it” 〔T10n0279 0274c11〕, the sixty’s 「周行無礙解脫虛空,分別一切法界」 tr. “he travels everywhere through the space of unobstructed liberation, discriminates the whole Dharma realm” 〔T09n0278 0626b12〕 — the eighty speaks with respect to the quiescence of the substance, the sixty with respect to the traveling everywhere of the function. (c) The eighty’s 「作諸佛事無有休息」 tr. “they do all manner of buddha-work without rest” 〔T10n0279 0274c13〕 ↔ the sixty’s 「廣作佛事」 tr. “does buddha-work on a vast scale.”

Clause ten The concluding exhortation

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279Sons of the Buddha! A bodhisattva-mahāsattva should use measureless means such as these, and measureless natures and characteristics, to know and to see the practice that the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One practices.T10n0279 0274c
Buddhabhadra T278Sons of the Buddha! A bodhisattva-mahāsattva, by measureless and boundless surpassing practices such as these, knows and sees the practice of the Tathāgata, the Worthy of Offerings, the Fully and Rightly Awakened One.T09n0278 0626b14

What the divergences bear upon: the eighty has the two items 「無量方便、無量性相」 tr. “measureless means, measureless natures and characteristics” 〔T10n0279 0274c15〕, the sixty the single item 「無量無邊勝行」 tr. “measureless and boundless surpassing practices.”

Clause eleven The number of the verses in repetition, and the first verse

WitnessVerbatim, renderedAttestation
Śikṣānanda T279It is like suchness, neither born nor ceasing, having no fixed place, and no one able to see it; the practice of the one of great bountiful benefit is just so — it goes beyond the three times and cannot be measured.T10n0279 0274c
Buddhabhadra T278It is like thusness, which has no exhausting: neither born nor ceasing, having no place either, and though one seek it, it cannot be seen.T09n0278 0626b18

What the divergences bear upon: the verses of the eighty are five verses of seven graphs, those of the sixty ten verses of five graphs — both the construction of the lines and the number of the verses differ; Chengguan, following the eighty-fascicle text, judges them to be 「五偈」 tr. “five verses,” while Fazang, following the sixty-fascicle text, judges them to be 「十偈頌五喻。各二頌」 tr. “ten verses setting forth the five similes, two verses each” 〔T35n1733 0412c01〕.


V. Scriptural Grounds of Sectarian Doctrine (the doctrinal eye)

(1) The two practices as the mutual completion of substance and characteristic — 「應知無礙行是如來行,應知真如行是如來行」 tr. “one should know that the unobstructed practice is the practice of the Tathāgata, and should know that the practice of suchness is the practice of the Tathāgata” 〔T10n0279 0274b18〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕. Chengguan’s explanation in four pairs is where the doctrinal eye of this sense lies:

「一無礙行者,即理之事行。真如行者,即事之理行。前即行相,後即行體。又前是即智之悲,後是即悲之智。前即真之俗,後即俗之真,融而無礙為如來行。」 tr. “First, the unobstructed practice is the practice of phenomena that is identical with principle. The practice of suchness is the practice of principle that is identical with phenomena. The former is the characteristic of practice, the latter the substance of practice. Again, the former is the compassion that is identical with wisdom, the latter the wisdom that is identical with compassion. The former is the conventional that is identical with the true, the latter the true that is identical with the conventional; and their fusing without obstruction is the practice of the Tathāgata.” 〔T35n1735 0881b07〕

The non-obstruction of principle and phenomena is not set up separately outside the two practices; it lies in the very mutual identity of those two practices — and this is the scriptural ground, within this chapter, for the gate of the non-obstruction of principle and phenomena in the Huayan school.

(2) Dwelling nowhere and yet universally manifesting the practice — 「如來、應、正等覺住無礙行,無有住處,而能普為一切眾生示現所行」 tr. “the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One dwells in the unobstructed practice and has no place of dwelling, and yet he is able to manifest universally to all sentient beings the practice that he practices” 〔T10n0279 0274b27〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕. Chengguan explains this as the non-duality of compassion and wisdom:

「智無所住,悲示所行,即悲智無礙,自無二礙、令他無礙,皆無礙行也。」 tr. “Wisdom dwells nowhere, compassion manifests what is practiced; that is, compassion and wisdom are unobstructed — he is himself without the two obstructions and he causes others to be unobstructed, and all of this is the unobstructed practice.” 〔T35n1735 0881b25〕

Dwelling nowhere is the side of wisdom, manifesting is the side of compassion; only when one is unobstructed oneself and further causes others to be unobstructed is it named the unobstructed practice.

(3) The double negation of ‘not measured’ — 「如法界,非量、非無量,無形故」 tr. “it is like the Dharma realm: it is not measured, it is not measureless, because it has no form” 〔T10n0279 0274b21〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕. Chengguan:

「既無有量,何有無量?若謂無量,即是量故。雙非永寂,為如來行,故心彌虛、行彌曠,終日行而未曾行。」 tr. “Since there is no measure, how could there be the measureless? For if one calls it measureless, that is precisely a measure. The double negation, everlastingly still, is the practice of the Tathāgata; therefore the more the mind is empty, the more the practice is vast — practicing all day long and yet never having practiced.” 〔T35n1735 0881b19〕

If the measureless is set up as a characteristic, it falls back into measure — hence the double negation is required. The one phrase 「終日行而未曾行」 tr. “practicing all day long and yet never having practiced” is where the character of the practice in this sense comes home.

(4) The practice of nature-arising — Fazang names this sense in his outline straightforwardly as 「性起行」 tr. “the practice of nature-arising,” and ties it to the realm of the preceding sense:

「第六性起行者,前明智所依境,今辨依境所成之行,故次明也。」 tr. “As for the sixth, the practice of nature-arising: earlier what was set forth was the realm upon which wisdom depends; now what is discerned is the practice accomplished in dependence upon that realm, and therefore it is set forth next.” 〔T35n1733 0412b17〕

The practice does not arise separately; it is accomplished precisely in dependence upon the realm realized — and this carries on from the preceding sense’s line ‘the ocean of wisdom arises from the great vows of ages past’ (Chengguan’s words).

(5) The two wings of calming and contemplation drawing forth and rescuing capacities already ripe — 「若曾種善根已成熟者,如來奮勇猛十力,以止觀兩翅鼓揚生死大愛水海」 tr. “if there are those who have planted roots of goodness in the past and have already ripened, the Tathāgata rouses his valiant ten powers and with the two wings of calming and contemplation beats up the great sea of the water of craving that is birth-and-death” 〔T10n0279 0274c05〕〔T10n0279 0274c〕. Fazang judges this simile to be 「佛勝用濟生行」 tr. “the Buddha’s practice of surpassing function that rescues the living” 〔T35n1733 0412b28〕, and Chengguan judges it to 「喻即智之悲」 tr. “figure the compassion that is identical with wisdom” 〔T35n1735 0881b27〕 — the Buddha’s drawing forth and rescuing has a capacity that it waits upon (roots of goodness planted in the past and already ripened); it is not an indiscriminate universal gathering-in.


VI. Divergent Interpretations of the Commentators (the ancient worthies · with their positions marked)

Chengguan, Huayan jing shu T35n1735 (a phrase-by-phrase commentary on the eighty-fascicle Avataṃsaka · the principal witness)

The reason for its coming and the division of the prose section:

「第六出現之行。前明分齊境智無邊,今彰運用則悲智無盡,雖智海已滿,悲無息故。長行中二:先標舉、後釋相。釋相中三:初雙標二行、次雙釋二行、後雙結二行。」 tr. “The sixth, the practice of the appearance. What was set forth earlier was the measure of the realm and the boundlessness of wisdom; now what is made manifest is the functioning, and there compassion and wisdom are inexhaustible — for though the ocean of wisdom is already full, compassion does not rest. Within the prose section there are two: first the raising and setting up, afterward the explanation of the characteristics. Within the explanation of the characteristics there are three: first the paired setting up of the two practices, next the paired explanation of the two practices, last the paired conclusion of the two practices.” 〔T35n1735 0881b03〕

The explanation of the two practices in four pairs:

「今初,義有多含:一無礙行者,即理之事行。真如行者,即事之理行。前即行相,後即行體。又前是即智之悲,後是即悲之智。前即真之俗,後即俗之真,融而無礙為如來行。」 tr. “Now the first: the meaning holds much within it. First, the unobstructed practice is the practice of phenomena that is identical with principle. The practice of suchness is the practice of principle that is identical with phenomena. The former is the characteristic of practice, the latter the substance of practice. Again, the former is the compassion that is identical with wisdom, the latter the wisdom that is identical with compassion. The former is the conventional that is identical with the true, the latter the true that is identical with the conventional; and their fusing without obstruction is the practice of the Tathāgata.” 〔T35n1735 0881b07〕

The three sections of the practice of suchness:

「今初,真如之名,言含法喻。文中有三:初牒名以解,明體絕三際,故同真如。契如成行,行即如也。過未非緣,故不生不動;現在離緣,故非起也。二復舉法界無形明雙非契中,是知實相等,皆如來行。三舉鳥飛虛空喻,釋非量義。」 tr. “Now the first: the name suchness, in what it says, contains both the dharma and the simile. Within the text there are three. First, the name is taken up and explained: this makes clear that its substance cuts off the three limits of time, and therefore it is the same as suchness. Tallying with suchness, practice is accomplished, and the practice is itself suchness. Past and future are not its conditions, and therefore it is unborn and unmoving; the present is apart from conditions, and therefore it does not arise. Second, he further raises the formlessness of the Dharma realm to make clear that the double negation tallies with the middle; from which one knows that true reality and the like are all the practice of the Tathāgata. Third, he raises the simile of the bird flying in space in order to explain the sense of not being measured.” 〔T35n1735 0881b12〕

The division of the unobstructed practice into dharma and simile, and the apportioning of the two similes:

「文中二:先約法總明、後以喻別顯。今初。智無所住,悲示所行,即悲智無礙,自無二礙、令他無礙,皆無礙行也。二別以喻顯中二喻:初金翅闢海喻,喻即智之悲;後日月無思喻,喻悲不失智。」 tr. “Within the text there are two: first it is set forth in general with respect to dharma, afterward it is shown in particular by way of simile. Now the first. Wisdom dwells nowhere, compassion manifests what is practiced; that is, compassion and wisdom are unobstructed — he is himself without the two obstructions and he causes others to be unobstructed, and all of this is the unobstructed practice. Second, within the showing in particular by way of simile there are two similes: the first, the simile of the golden-winged bird parting the sea, figures the compassion that is identical with wisdom; the latter, the simile of the sun and moon without thought, figures the compassion that does not lose wisdom.” 〔T35n1735 0881b24〕

The double conclusion: 「性結真如,相結無礙。」 tr. “Nature concludes suchness, characteristic concludes the unobstructed.” 〔T35n1735 0881b29〕

Fazang, Tanxuan ji T35n1733 (the commentary on the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka, the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata)

The name in the outline and the threefold division of the prose section:

「第六性起行者,前明智所依境,今辨依境所成之行,故次明也。就辨釋中,長行內三,謂標、釋、結。初中標二行。」 tr. “As for the sixth, the practice of nature-arising: earlier what was set forth was the realm upon which wisdom depends; now what is discerned is the practice accomplished in dependence upon that realm, and therefore it is set forth next. As for the discerning explanation, within the prose section there are three, namely setting up, explaining, and concluding. In the first of these, the two practices are set up.” 〔T35n1733 0412b17〕

Three interpretations of the two practices (the interpretation of the ancients · a further interpretation · an additional interpretation):

「古人釋:無礙行者,明俗諦行。二如如行者,明真諦行。今更釋:初是會事同理,理不礙事,是無礙行;二事盡理現,名如如行。又釋:初是量智,於外事用無礙;二是理智,內證如如也。」 tr. “The interpretation of the ancients: the unobstructed practice sets forth the practice of the conventional truth; the second, the practice of thusness, sets forth the practice of the true truth. A further interpretation now: the first is the gathering of phenomena into sameness with principle, principle not obstructing phenomena, and this is the unobstructed practice; the second is that phenomena are exhausted and principle appears, which is named the practice of thusness. An additional interpretation: the first is discerning wisdom, unobstructed in its functioning upon outward phenomena; the second is principial wisdom, inwardly realizing thusness.” 〔T35n1733 0412b20〕

The apportioning of the five similes:

「釋中有五喻:一真無遷變喻,喻佛至絕三際行,即釋如如行也。下四釋無礙行。二此法界無形喻,喻佛體無限礙行。三飛鳥翔空喻,喻佛圓無分齊行。四金翅搏海喻。喻佛勝用濟生行。五日月行空喻。喻佛無功成事行。皆以後釋前可知。」 tr. “Within the explanation there are five similes. First, the simile of the true that does not shift or alter, figuring the Buddha’s practice that reaches to the cutting off of the three limits of time; this is the explanation of the practice of thusness. The four below explain the unobstructed practice. Second, this simile of the Dharma realm having no form figures the Buddha’s practice whose substance has no limit or obstruction. Third, the simile of the flying bird soaring in space figures the Buddha’s practice that is perfect and without demarcation. Fourth, the simile of the golden-winged bird seizing through the sea. It figures the Buddha’s practice of surpassing function that rescues the living. Fifth, the simile of the sun and moon traveling in space. It figures the Buddha’s practice of accomplishing affairs without effort. In every case the latter explains the former, as may be understood.” 〔T35n1733 0412b24〕

The conclusion and the outline of the verses: 「三結文可知。頌中十偈頌五喻。」 tr. “Third, the concluding text can be understood as it stands. Among the verses, ten verses set forth the five similes.” 〔T35n1733 0412c01〕

Li Tongxuan, Xin Huayan jing lun T36n1739

No section of the outline dedicated to this sense is found (throughout the work, the hits for 「如來出現品」 tr. “The Appearance of the Tathāgata” are all scattered citations adduced in other chapters, not a section dedicated to this sense) — 〔not found〕.

Chengguan, Yanyi chao T36n1736

Within this range no independent heading of the outline is found — 〔not found〕.

Recorded without adjudication: on the explanation of the two practices, Chengguan makes four paired readings (the practice of phenomena identical with principle · the practice of principle identical with phenomena / the characteristic of practice · the substance of practice / the compassion identical with wisdom · the wisdom identical with compassion / the conventional identical with the true · the true identical with the conventional), while Fazang sets out three interpretations (the ancients divide them by the conventional truth and the true truth · the further interpretation divides them by the gathering of phenomena into sameness with principle and by phenomena being exhausted and principle appearing · the additional interpretation divides them by discerning wisdom and principial wisdom). On the apportioning of the similes, Chengguan assigns the three sections — suchness cutting off the three limits of time · the Dharma realm having no form · the bird flying in space — to the practice of suchness, and the two similes of the golden-winged bird · the sun and moon to the unobstructed practice; Fazang, however, assigns the one simile of the true that does not shift or alter to the practice of thusness, and the remaining four similes (the Dharma realm having no form · the flying bird soaring in space · the golden-winged bird seizing through the sea · the sun and moon traveling in space) all to the unobstructed practice — so that on the assignment of the two sections, the Dharma realm having no form and the bird flying, the two masters judge differently. On the judgment of the number of the verses, Chengguan follows the eighty-fascicle text, whose text has five verses of seven graphs; Fazang follows the sixty-fascicle text and makes it 「十偈頌五喻。各二頌」 tr. “ten verses setting forth the five similes, two verses each” 〔T35n1733 0412c01〕. Whether the four paired readings or the three interpretations is the correct exposition, whether the two sections of the Dharma realm having no form and the bird flying belong to the practice of suchness or to the unobstructed practice, and how the number of verses in the two texts is divided — the ancients held differing views, and these are recorded without adjudication.


VII. Cross-Reading and Lineage

  • The sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka, the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata 〔T09n0278 0626a15–0626c09 exclusive〕: the complete parallel translation of this sense; the structure of the scene is entirely the same (the general setting up of the two practices · suchness cutting off the three limits of time · the Dharma realm having no form · the bird flying in space · manifesting while dwelling nowhere · the king of the golden-winged birds parting the sea · the sun and moon without thought · the concluding exhortation · the verses in repetition), and the order of the similes agrees; for the clause-by-clause collation see section IV.
  • The preceding sense, ‘the realm of the appearance’ 〔T10n0279 0273c06–0274b17 exclusive〕: both Chengguan and Fazang establish the reason for the coming of this sense by tying the realm to the practice — 「前明智所依境,今辨依境所成之行」 tr. “earlier what was set forth was the realm upon which wisdom depends; now what is discerned is the practice accomplished in dependence upon that realm” 〔T35n1733 0412b18〕; this sense should be read together with the preceding one.
  • The Huayan doctrine of the non-obstruction of principle and phenomena: Chengguan explains the two practices as 「即理之事行」 tr. “the practice of phenomena that is identical with principle” and 「即事之理行」 tr. “the practice of principle that is identical with phenomena,” and closes with 「融而無礙為如來行」 tr. “their fusing without obstruction is the practice of the Tathāgata” 〔T35n1735 0881b10〕 — it is here in this passage that Chengguan explains the non-obstruction of principle and phenomena.
  • The Nirvāṇa Sūtra: Chengguan cites it for a witness beneath the double negation — 「復有一行是如來行,所謂大乘大般涅槃。」 tr. “There is, further, one practice that is the practice of the Tathāgata, namely the great parinirvāṇa of the Great Vehicle.” 〔T35n1735 0881b22〕 What is tied to this sense is only Chengguan’s citation; it is not text of this sūtra.
  • The Dasheng qixin lun T32n1666: searched with 「無礙行」 tr. “the unobstructed practice” and 「性起」 tr. “nature-arising,” 0 hits — 〔not found〕.
  • Fazang’s Wujiao zhang T45n1866: searched with 「如來行」 tr. “the practice of the Tathāgata” and 「無礙行」 tr. “the unobstructed practice” over the cluster of citations from the nature-arising chapter, 0 hits — 〔not found〕.
  • The treatises of the carrying-forward line (the Cheng weishi lun T31n1585 · the She dacheng lun T31n1594 · the Yuqie shidi lun T30n1579): searched with 「金翅鳥王」 tr. “the king of the golden-winged birds,” 「無礙行」 tr. “the unobstructed practice,” and 「真如行」 tr. “the practice of suchness,” 0 hits — 〔not found〕. This sense has no direct text taken up on the consciousness-only line; the lack is recorded as it stands, with nothing from elsewhere put in its place.

VIII. Edition Location Register

  • Śikṣānanda T279 (the base text): chapter thirty-seven, The Appearance of the Tathāgata, the sixth sense, the practice of the appearance, from 〔T10n0279 0274b17〕 to 〔0274c28〕 exclusive (the seventh assembly, the second gathering in the Hall of Universal Light). The order of the passages: the question raised and the paired setting up of the two practices 〔0274b〕 · suchness cutting off the three limits of time 〔0274b〕 · the Dharma realm having no form 〔0274b〕 · the simile of the bird flying in space and the comparison drawn with expounding 〔0274b〕 · manifesting while dwelling nowhere 〔0274b〕 · the simile of the king of the golden-winged birds and its matching to the dharma 〔0274b〕 · the simile of the sun and moon without thought 〔0274c〕 · the concluding exhortation 〔0274c〕 · the five verses in repetition 〔0274c〕. 〔Recorded · the granularity of attestation〕 For this sense the eighty-fascicle text is tied clause by clause to attestations at the level of the line; where a unique location could not be established, the attestation is given at the level of the column.
  • Buddhabhadra T278 (the Jin translation, the principal witness for collation): the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata, chapter thirty-two, the third portion, from 〔T09n0278 0626a15〕 to 〔0626c09〕 exclusive. The general setting up of the two practices 0626a16 · suchness cutting off the three limits of time 0626a17 · the Dharma realm having no body 0626a19 · the bird flying in space 0626a21 · the comparison drawn with expounding 0626a24 · manifesting while dwelling nowhere 0626a27 · the simile of the king of the golden-winged birds 0626b01 · its matching to the dharma 0626b05 · the simile of the sun and moon 0626b10 · the concluding exhortation 0626b14 · the verses in repetition begin 0626b16 (the first verse 0626b18 · the verse on the golden-winged bird 0626c01 · the verse on the sun and moon 0626c05 · the verses end 0626c09 exclusive).
  • Chengguan, Huayan jing shu T35n1735: the sixth, the practice of the appearance, begins 0881b03 and ends 0881c01 exclusive. The reason for its coming and the division of the prose section 0881b03 · the explanation of the two practices in four pairs 0881b07 · the outline of the paired explanation 0881b11 · the three sections of the practice of suchness 0881b12 · the Dharma realm having no form 0881b15 · the simile of the bird flying and the two senses of not being measured 0881b17 · the summing-up on the double negation 0881b20 · the citation of the Nirvāṇa Sūtra as witness 0881b22 · the outline of the unobstructed practice 0881b23 · the general setting forth with respect to dharma 0881b24 · the showing in particular by the two similes 0881b26 · the double conclusion 0881b28. The Yanyi chao T36n1736: an independent heading of the outline within this range 〔not found〕.
  • Fazang, Tanxuan ji T35n1733: the sixth, the practice of nature-arising, begins 0412b17 and ends 0412c02 exclusive. The name in the outline and the reason for its coming 0412b17 · the threefold division of the prose section and the setting up of the two practices 0412b19 · the interpretation of the ancients 0412b20 · the further interpretation 0412b21 · the additional interpretation 0412b23 · the apportioning of the five similes 0412b24 · the conclusion and the outline of the verses 0412c01.
  • Li Tongxuan, Xin Huayan jing lun T36n1739: a section of the outline dedicated to this sense 〔not found〕.
  • Variant readings: within the range of T279 covered by this unit, 〔0274b17〕–〔0274c27〕, the Taishō base text carries 1 collation note, recorded one by one without adjudication (base reading 【大】|variant readings of other witnesses, several witnesses separated by /): 〔0274b20〕起【大】|現【聖】.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing. The full statement of AI's role across the 指月 project is maintained at methodology.

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0