華嚴經 品三十七 如來出現品 · 出現境界Avataṃsaka Sūtra · The Appearance of the Tathāgata · The Realm of the Appearance

〔T10 0273c06〕
心要Essence

龍不離本處,雨已遍大地。

普賢自己先問:佛的境界該怎麼知道。他先列了十樣——世間、三世、剎、法、眾生,一路收到真如、實際,最後一句竟是『沒有境界的那個境界』。收到指不出來,才是佛境。

然後他把尺遞回你手上:「應知心境界是如來境界。」你的心隨你怎麼想就怎麼現,從來沒有人量出過它的邊——佛境隨機現身現智,也一樣。

他還說了一個很長的譬喻:四天下二萬五千條河入海,八十億龍王輪番倍雨,說到大眾答言甚多、不可為喻;然後一句推倒:「佛境界非譬所及。」

先給你一個量,再告訴你這個量不夠。

而智海是從往昔大願生起的——願有多深,海就有多深。

The dragon does not leave his own place, and the rain has already covered the whole earth.

Samantabhadra puts the question himself: how is the realm of the Buddha to be known? He first sets out ten things — the world, the three times, the lands, the dharmas, sentient beings — running on to gather in suchness and the true limit, and then the last clause of all turns out to be ‘that realm which is no realm’. Only when it has been gathered in to what cannot be pointed at is it the realm of a buddha.

Then he hands the measuring rod back into your own hands: “The bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know that the realm of the mind is the realm of the Tathāgata.” Your mind appears just as you think it, and no one has ever measured its far edge — and the realm of a buddha, manifesting body and wisdom according to what meets it, is the same.

He tells besides a very long simile: twenty-five thousand rivers of the four continents flowing into the sea, eighty koṭis of dragon kings raining by turns and each doubling the last, until the great assembly answers that it is very much indeed and cannot be told by any simile; and then a single sentence pushes it all over: “the Buddha’s realm is not what a simile can reach.”

First he gives you a measure, and then he tells you that this measure is not enough.

And the ocean of wisdom arises from the great vows of long ago — as deep as the vow, so deep the ocean.

原典Canonical · verbatim

〔T10 0273〕 「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺境界?佛子!菩薩摩訶薩以無障無礙智慧,知一切世間境界是如來境界,知一切三世境界、一切剎境界、一切法境界、一切眾生境界、真如無差別境界、法界無障礙境界、實際無邊際境界、虛空無分量境界、無境界境界是如來境界。佛子!如一切世間境界無量,如來境界亦無量;如一切三世境界無量,如來境界亦無量;乃至,如無境界境界無量,如來境界亦無量;如無境界境界一切處無有,如來境界亦如是一切處無有。佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應知心境界是如來境界。如心境界無量無邊、無縛無脫,如來境界亦無量無邊、無縛無脫。何以故?以如是如是思惟分別,如是如是無量顯現故。佛子!如大龍王隨心降雨,其雨不從內出、不從外出。如來境界亦復如是,隨於如是思惟分別,則有如是無量顯現,於十方中悉無來處。佛子!如大海水,皆從龍王心力所起。諸佛如來一切智海亦復如是,皆從如來往昔大願之所生起。 「佛子!一切智海無量無邊,不可思議,不可言說;然我今者略說譬諭,汝應諦聽。佛子!此閻浮提有二千五百河流入大海,西拘耶尼有五千河流入大海,東弗婆提有七千五百河流入大海,北 〔T10 0274〕 欝單越有一萬河流入大海。 「佛子!此四天下,如是二萬五千河相續不絕流入大海。於意云何,此水多不?」 答言:「甚多。」 「佛子!復有十光明龍王,雨大海中水倍過前;百光明龍王,雨大海中水復倍前;大莊嚴龍王、摩那斯龍王、雷震龍王、難陀跋難陀龍王、無量光明龍王、連霔不斷龍王、大勝龍王、大奮迅龍王,如是等八十億諸大龍王,各雨大海,皆悉展轉倍過於前;娑竭羅龍王太子,名:閻浮幢,雨大海中水復倍前。佛子!十光明龍王宮殿中水流入大海,復倍過前;百光明龍王宮殿中水流入大海,復倍過前;大莊嚴龍王、摩那斯龍王、雷震龍王、難陀跋難陀龍王、無量光明龍王、連霔不斷龍王、大勝龍王、大奮迅龍王,如是等八十億諸大龍王,宮殿各別,其中有水流入大海,皆悉展轉倍過於前;娑竭羅龍王太子閻浮幢宮殿中水流入大海,復倍過前。佛子!娑竭羅龍王連雨大海,水復倍前;其娑竭羅龍王宮殿中水涌出入海,復倍於前;其所出水紺瑠璃色,涌出有時,是故大海潮不失時。佛子!如是大海,其水無量,眾寶無量,眾生無量,所依大地亦復無量。 「佛子!於汝意云何,彼大海為無量不?」答言:「實為無量,不可為諭。」 「佛子!此大海無量於如來智海無量,百分不及一,千分不及一,乃至優波尼沙陀分不及其一;但隨眾生心為作譬諭,而佛境界非譬所及。佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應知如來智海無量,從初發心修一切菩薩行不斷故;應知寶聚無量,一切菩提分法、三寶種不斷故;應知所住眾生無量,一切學、無學、聲聞、獨覺所受用故;應知住地無量,從初歡喜地乃至究竟無障礙地諸菩薩所居故。佛子!菩薩摩訶薩為入無量智慧利益一切眾生故,於如來、應、正等覺境界應如是知。」 爾時,普賢菩薩摩訶薩欲重明此義而說頌言:   「如心境界無有量,諸佛境界亦復然;
  如心境界從意生,佛境如是應觀察。
  如龍不離於本處,以心威力霔大雨,
  雨水雖無來去處,隨龍心故悉充洽。
  十力牟尼亦如是,無所從來無所去,
  若有淨心則現身,量等法界入毛孔。
  如海珍奇無有量,眾生大地亦復然,
  水性一味等無別,於中生者各蒙利。
  如來智海亦如是,一切所有皆無量,
  有學無學住地人,悉在其中得饒益。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

徵問標舉:菩薩應該怎樣知道如來的境界

〔普賢菩薩摩訶薩對如來性起妙德菩薩等大眾說〕

「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應該怎樣知道如來、應、正等覺的境界呢?佛子!菩薩摩訶薩以沒有障、沒有礙的智慧,知道一切世間的境界就是如來的境界,知道一切三世的境界、一切佛剎的境界、一切法的境界、一切眾生的境界、真如沒有差別的境界、法界沒有障礙的境界、實際沒有邊際的境界、虛空沒有分量的境界、沒有境界的境界——這些都是如來的境界。

類推無量:境有多無量,佛境就有多無量

「佛子!就像一切世間的境界無量,如來的境界也無量;就像一切三世的境界無量,如來的境界也無量;乃至於,就像沒有境界的那個境界無量,如來的境界也無量。就像沒有境界的那個境界在一切處都沒有它,如來的境界也是這樣,在一切處都沒有它。

近取自心:拿自己的心去量佛的境界

「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應該知道:心的境界就是如來的境界。就像心的境界無量、無邊,沒有束縛、沒有解脫,如來的境界也是無量、無邊,沒有束縛、沒有解脫。為什麼呢?因為心是這樣這樣地思惟分別,就這樣這樣地無量顯現的緣故。

龍雨喻:雨不從內出,也不從外出

「佛子!譬如大龍王隨著自己的心意降雨,那雨不是從裡面出來的,也不是從外面出來的。如來的境界也是這樣:隨著這樣的思惟分別,就有這樣的無量顯現,而在十方之中,全都找不到它的來處。

海從心起喻:智海是從往昔大願生起的

「佛子!譬如大海的水,都是從龍王的心力所生起的。諸佛如來的一切智海也是這樣,都是從如來往昔的大願所生起的。

標章誡聽:智海不可思議,且說一個譬喻

「佛子!一切智海無量、無邊,不可思議,不可言說;然而我現在略說一個譬喻,你們應當仔細聽。佛子!這個閻浮提〔南方大洲〕有二千五百條河流入大海,西拘耶尼〔西方大洲〕有五千條河流入大海,東弗婆提〔東方大洲〕有七千五百條河流入大海,北欝單越〔北方大洲〕有一萬條河流入大海。

四洲之水:這樣的水多不多

「佛子!這四天下,像這樣二萬五千條河相續不斷地流入大海。你們認為怎麼樣呢,這些水多不多?」

〔大眾〕答說:「很多。」

龍王倍雨:八十億大龍王各各降雨大海

「佛子!又有十光明龍王,雨在大海中的水,加倍超過前面所說的;百光明龍王,雨在大海中的水,又加倍超過前面;大莊嚴龍王、摩那斯龍王、雷震龍王、難陀跋難陀龍王、無量光明龍王、連霔不斷龍王、大勝龍王、大奮迅龍王,像這樣的八十億諸大龍王,各各降雨大海,全都輾轉加倍超過前面;娑竭羅龍王的太子,名叫閻浮幢,雨在大海中的水,又加倍超過前面。

宮殿出水:諸龍王宮殿中的水又倍過於前

「佛子!十光明龍王宮殿中的水流入大海,又加倍超過前面;百光明龍王宮殿中的水流入大海,又加倍超過前面;大莊嚴龍王、摩那斯龍王、雷震龍王、難陀跋難陀龍王、無量光明龍王、連霔不斷龍王、大勝龍王、大奮迅龍王,像這樣的八十億諸大龍王,宮殿各各不同,其中都有水流入大海,全都輾轉加倍超過前面;娑竭羅龍王太子閻浮幢宮殿中的水流入大海,又加倍超過前面。

娑竭羅兼雨兼出:潮汐所以不失時

「佛子!娑竭羅龍王連續降雨大海,水又加倍於前面;那娑竭羅龍王宮殿中的水涌出流入海中,又加倍於前面。他所涌出的水是紺瑠璃的顏色,涌出有一定的時候,因此大海的潮汐不會失時。佛子!像這樣的大海,它的水無量,眾寶無量,眾生無量,所依止的大地也是無量。

海不及智海:譬喻終不及佛境

「佛子!在你們看來怎麼樣,那大海算不算無量呢?」

〔大眾〕答說:「實在是無量,無法用譬喻來說。」

「佛子!這大海的無量,比起如來智海的無量,百分不及一分,千分不及一分,乃至於優波尼沙陀分〔極其微細的分數〕也不及其中一分;只是隨順眾生的心而為他們作個譬喻罷了,而佛的境界並不是譬喻所能到達的。

四種無量:智海·寶聚·眾生·住地

「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應當知道:如來的智海無量,因為從最初發心以來修一切菩薩行不曾間斷的緣故;應當知道寶聚無量,因為一切菩提分法、三寶的種子不曾斷絕的緣故;應當知道所安住的眾生無量,因為一切有學、無學、聲聞、獨覺都在其中受用的緣故;應當知道所住的地無量,因為從最初的歡喜地一直到究竟的無障礙地,諸菩薩都居住在其中的緣故。

結所知:知佛境界,是為了利益一切眾生

「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩為了進入無量的智慧、利益一切眾生的緣故,對於如來、應、正等覺的境界,應當這樣知道。」

重頌:五偈重明此義

那時,普賢菩薩摩訶薩想要重新闡明這個義理,而說偈頌道:

「就像心的境界沒有分量,諸佛的境界也是這樣;就像心的境界是從意所生,佛的境界也應當這樣觀察。(頌心境界)

「就像龍不離開牠的本處,只以心的威力霔下大雨,雨水雖然沒有來處也沒有去處,隨著龍的心意,卻無不充足潤洽。(頌龍雨喻)

「具十力的牟尼〔寂默者·佛〕也是這樣,沒有從哪裡來,也沒有到哪裡去;如果有人心清淨,佛就在他面前現身,那身量等同法界,卻能進入一個毛孔。(頌佛身無來去)

「就像大海裡的珍奇沒有分量,眾生與大地也是這樣;水性只是一味,平等而沒有差別,在其中生活的,卻各各蒙受利益。(頌海水四無量)

「如來的智海也是這樣,一切所有全都無量;有學、無學、住地的人,全都在這智海之中得到饒益。」(頌合四無量)


Raising the Question: How Should a Bodhisattva Know the Realm of the Tathāgata

〔Samantabhadra Bodhisattva-Mahāsattva speaks to the bodhisattva Wondrous Virtue of the Tathāgata’s Nature-Arising and the rest of the great assembly〕

“Sons of the Buddha! How should the bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the realm of the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One? Sons of the Buddha! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, with wisdom that has no obstruction and no hindrance, knows that the realm of all worlds is the realm of the Tathāgata; he knows the realm of all three times, the realm of all buddha-lands, the realm of all dharmas, the realm of all sentient beings, the realm of suchness without difference, the realm of the Dharma realm without obstruction, the realm of the true limit without any bound, the realm of empty space without measure, and the realm that is no realm — all of these are the realm of the Tathāgata.

Reasoning by Extension: As Measureless as the Realms Are, So Measureless Is the Buddha’s Realm

“Sons of the Buddha! Just as the realm of all worlds is measureless, so the realm of the Tathāgata is measureless; just as the realm of all three times is measureless, so the realm of the Tathāgata is measureless; and so on, even to this: just as that realm which is no realm is measureless, so the realm of the Tathāgata is measureless. Just as that realm which is no realm is in no place at all to be found, so it is with the realm of the Tathāgata — in no place at all is it to be found.

Taking the Nearest Thing, Your Own Mind: Measuring the Buddha’s Realm by Your Own Mind

“Sons of the Buddha! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know that the realm of the mind is the realm of the Tathāgata. Just as the realm of the mind is measureless and boundless, without bondage and without release, so the realm of the Tathāgata too is measureless and boundless, without bondage and without release. Why is this? Because it is in just such and such a way that the mind ponders and discriminates, and in just such and such a way that measureless things appear.

The Simile of the Dragon’s Rain: The Rain Comes Neither from Within nor from Without

“Sons of the Buddha! It is like a great dragon king sending down rain according to his own mind: that rain does not come forth from within, nor does it come in from without. So it is too with the realm of the Tathāgata: according to such pondering and discriminating there are such measureless appearings, and yet within the ten directions there is nowhere at all that they come from.

The Simile of the Ocean Arising from the Mind: The Ocean of Wisdom Arises from the Great Vows of Long Ago

“Sons of the Buddha! It is like the water of the great ocean, which all arises from the power of the mind of the dragon king. So it is too with the ocean of all-knowing wisdom of all the buddhas and tathāgatas: it all arises from the great vows that the Tathāgata made in ages past.

Setting Out the Heading and Bidding Them Listen: The Ocean of Wisdom Is Inconceivable, and Yet One Simile Will Be Told

“Sons of the Buddha! The ocean of all-knowing wisdom is measureless and boundless, inconceivable and not to be told in speech; yet I shall now tell one simile in brief, and you should listen to it attentively. Sons of the Buddha! In this Jambudvīpa 〔the great continent of the south〕 there are two thousand five hundred rivers that flow into the great ocean; in Godānīya of the west 〔the great continent of the west〕 there are five thousand rivers that flow into the great ocean; in Pūrvavideha of the east 〔the great continent of the east〕 there are seven thousand five hundred rivers that flow into the great ocean; in Uttarakuru of the north 〔the great continent of the north〕 there are ten thousand rivers that flow into the great ocean.

The Waters of the Four Continents: Is This Water Much or Not

“Sons of the Buddha! In these four continents, twenty-five thousand rivers such as these flow on without break into the great ocean. What do you think — is this water much or not?”

〔The great assembly〕 answered and said: “Very much indeed.”

The Dragon Kings Double the Rain: Eighty Koṭis of Great Dragon Kings Each Send Down Rain upon the Ocean

“Sons of the Buddha! Further, there is the dragon king Ten Lights, and the water he rains into the great ocean doubles and exceeds what was said before; and the dragon king Hundred Lights, and the water he rains into the great ocean again doubles and exceeds what went before; the dragon king Great Adornment, the dragon king Manasvin, the dragon king Thunder-Peal, the dragon kings Nanda and Upananda, the dragon king Measureless Light, the dragon king Unceasing Downpour, the dragon king Great Victor, the dragon king Great Rousing — eighty koṭis of great dragon kings such as these each send down rain upon the great ocean, and all of them, turn after turn, double and exceed what went before; and the crown prince of the dragon king Sāgara, named Jambu Banner, rains into the great ocean water that again doubles and exceeds what went before.

Water from the Palaces: The Water in the Palaces of the Dragon Kings Again Doubles What Went Before

“Sons of the Buddha! The water in the palace of the dragon king Ten Lights flows into the great ocean, and again doubles and exceeds what went before; the water in the palace of the dragon king Hundred Lights flows into the great ocean, and again doubles and exceeds what went before; the dragon king Great Adornment, the dragon king Manasvin, the dragon king Thunder-Peal, the dragon kings Nanda and Upananda, the dragon king Measureless Light, the dragon king Unceasing Downpour, the dragon king Great Victor, the dragon king Great Rousing — eighty koṭis of great dragon kings such as these have palaces each one different from the others, and within them all there is water that flows into the great ocean, and all of it, turn after turn, doubles and exceeds what went before; and the water in the palace of Jambu Banner, the crown prince of the dragon king Sāgara, flows into the great ocean and again doubles and exceeds what went before.

Sāgara Both Rains and Pours Forth: Why the Tides Never Miss Their Time

“Sons of the Buddha! The dragon king Sāgara rains upon the great ocean without break, and the water again doubles what went before; and the water in the palace of that dragon king Sāgara wells up and flows into the ocean, and again doubles what went before. The water that he pours forth is of the colour of dark-blue beryl, and it wells up at a set season, and for this reason the tides of the great ocean do not miss their time. Sons of the Buddha! Such is the great ocean: its water is measureless, its many jewels are measureless, its sentient beings are measureless, and the great earth upon which it rests is likewise measureless.

The Ocean Does Not Reach the Ocean of Wisdom: In the End the Simile Does Not Reach the Buddha’s Realm

“Sons of the Buddha! What do you think — is that great ocean measureless or not?”

〔The great assembly〕 answered and said: “It is measureless indeed, and cannot be told by any simile.”

“Sons of the Buddha! This measurelessness of the great ocean, set against the measurelessness of the Tathāgata’s ocean of wisdom, does not amount to one part in a hundred, nor to one part in a thousand, nor even to one part of the upaniṣad part 〔a fraction of the utmost minuteness〕; it is only in accordance with the minds of sentient beings that a simile is made for them, and the Buddha’s realm is not what a simile can reach.

The Four Measureless Things: The Ocean of Wisdom · the Mass of Jewels · Sentient Beings · the Ground They Dwell On

“Sons of the Buddha! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know that the Tathāgata’s ocean of wisdom is measureless, because from the first arousing of the thought of awakening he has cultivated all the practices of a bodhisattva without break; he should know that the mass of jewels is measureless, because all the factors of awakening and the lineage of the Three Jewels have never been cut off; he should know that the sentient beings who dwell there are measureless, because all the learners and those beyond learning, the śrāvakas and the pratyekabuddhas, take their enjoyment therein; he should know that the ground they dwell on is measureless, because from the first Joyful Ground to the ultimate Ground of No Obstruction the bodhisattvas all dwell therein.

Concluding What Is to Be Known: To Know the Buddha’s Realm Is for the Benefit of All Sentient Beings

“Sons of the Buddha! For the sake of entering measureless wisdom and benefiting all sentient beings, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know in this way the realm of the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One.”

The Repeated Verses: Five Verses Making This Meaning Clear Again

At that time Samantabhadra Bodhisattva-Mahāsattva, wishing to make this meaning clear again, spoke these verses:

“Just as the realm of the mind has no measure, so too is the realm of all the buddhas; just as the realm of the mind is born of thought, so should the Buddha’s realm be contemplated. (a verse on the realm of the mind)

“Just as the dragon does not leave his own place, and by the power of his mind alone pours down the great rain, and though the rainwater has no place it comes from and no place it goes to, yet according to the dragon’s mind there is nothing it does not fill and moisten. (a verse on the simile of the dragon’s rain)

“The Muni 〔the Silent One · the Buddha〕 who is furnished with the ten powers is likewise so: there is nowhere he comes from and nowhere he goes; and if there be one whose mind is pure, the Buddha manifests his body before him — a body whose measure equals the Dharma realm, and yet able to enter a single pore. (a verse on the Buddha’s body neither coming nor going)

“Just as the rare treasures within the great ocean have no measure, so too are its sentient beings and its great earth; the nature of water is of one taste alone, equal and without difference, and yet those who live within it each receive its benefit. (a verse on the four measureless things of the ocean’s water)

“So too is the Tathāgata’s ocean of wisdom: all that it has is wholly measureless; the learners, those beyond learning, and those who dwell on the grounds all obtain abundant benefit within it.” (a verse matching the four measureless things)

義疏Exposition

為什麼要問『如來的境界』

前面一義講的是如來的心意——那是能知的智;這一義忽然轉問:那個智所對的境,又是什麼?普賢一開口就是一個問句:「菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺境界?」問法值得留意:他不問『如來的境界是什麼』,而問『菩薩應該怎樣知道』。境本身不可思議,可知境的路數卻可以指出來。

有人會以為,佛的境界既然不可思議,那就不必問了,問也白問。這正是本義要排的第一個誤解。澄觀判此段云「正顯分齊之境,兼辨所緣之境」,並說前一義與此一義「二義相成,如函蓋相稱」——前面明能知,這裡辨所緣,因為所緣無邊,才顯得那個智的分齊難以思量;反過來,分齊難思,才能窮盡所緣之境。法藏標此科逕作「明性起境界」,說得更直:「前既有能知大智,今明所知境也。」

所以這一問不是玄談的起頭,而是修行的起頭:你要知道佛的果德有多大,才知道自己發的心該有多大。而經文接著就把量佛境的那把尺遞到你手上——那把尺,不在天上。

十種境界:從世間一路數到「無境界境界」

普賢先給出能知的條件:「以無障無礙智慧」。澄觀說得很硬:「先令以無障礙智為能知者,非此不能量佛境故。」法藏同樣:「若不得此無量無邊智,無由得說廣大境也。」——沒有這把尺,底下十句一句也量不了。

然後十境列開:世間、三世、剎、法、眾生、真如無差別、法界無障礙、實際無邊際、虛空無分量、無境界境界。這十句不是隨口排的。澄觀逐句配位:第一句通舉所化的對象,第二是化的時間,第三是化的處所,第四是化所用的法,第五是所化的人;第六、七、八三句都在說所證——真如說的是體,常一味所以叫無差別;法界是生法所依,所以叫無礙;實際是窮事至實,所以叫無邊;第九句是化處的分齊,最後一句則遍通一切。

要當心的是把這十句讀成十樣東西堆在一起。它們是同一件事的十個面:從最粗的世間,一路收到最細的真如、實際,再收到連「境界」這個名字都不成立的那一句。次第是往裡收的,不是往外攤的。

「無境界境界」:這一句是全段的眼

十句之末忽然說「無境界境界是如來境界」——沒有境界的那個境界,才是如來的境界。這句話最容易被讀成故弄玄虛。它其實在做一件很精確的事:把前面九句一併收掉。澄觀說:「後一雙非,顯前九境即同無故。」

法藏的解釋更近一層。他先簡別:「言非境界境界者,非是識所變境故云也。」——不是識所變出來的那種境。凡是識變的境,必定與能緣的識相對而立,有此就有彼。佛境不是這樣的境。所以他又說:「十境智不二名非境界,以不異智之境名為非境,即以此非境為如來境。」境與智不再是兩個,境不是智之外的另一頭,這才叫「非境」——而正是這個「非境」,被立為如來的境界。

落到讀者這裡:你若還在想像一個『佛所看見的、極其廣大的風景』,那還是識所變的境,還是兩頭。本義要說的是,到了佛地,能所已經不隔,所以佛境不能當成一個對象去指認。指不出來,不是因為它太遠,是因為它不在對面。

境無量故智無量,境無所在故佛亦無所在

十境列完,經文立刻做兩重類推。第一重:一切世間境界無量,如來境界也無量;三世境界無量,如來境界也無量;乃至無境界境界無量,如來境界也無量。澄觀釋此為「境智相稱故皆無量」——境與智是相稱的一對,量境即是量智。

第二重更要緊:「如無境界境界一切處無有,如來境界亦如是一切處無有。」前面說了種種境界,這裡忽然說一切處都沒有它,會不會自相矛盾?不矛盾。澄觀接得極好:「後約無境顯其非有,乃至真如皆不可得故。是以諸境雲興而常寂也。」諸境如雲一般興起而本自常寂——雲確實在天上,可你抓不到一片握在手裡。遍在,與可指認的所在,是兩回事。讀者常把『無所不在』誤讀成『處處可指』,本義在此把這個誤讀切斷了。

拿自己的心去量佛的境界

到這裡經文做了一個令人意外的轉折:「菩薩摩訶薩應知心境界是如來境界。」剛才那把量佛境的尺,原來就是你此刻這一念心。

經文給心境界四個定語:無量、無邊、無縛、無脫。澄觀分作兩截讀:「無量無邊,語其相用廣大。無縛無脫,明其體性深寂。」前一對說用,後一對說體。然後經文自設一問:何以故?答:「以如是如是思惟分別,如是如是無量顯現故。」澄觀把這一問一答的意思講得很白:「菩薩自心隨思即顯,故無分量。佛境亦爾,隨機顯現若身若智,何有量耶?」

排一個誤解:這不是說『你的心就是佛的境界,所以你已經是佛』。經文用的是「況」——以近況遠,拿一件你天天經驗、卻從未細看的事,去比一件你從未經驗的事。你的心隨你怎麼想就怎麼現,從沒有人量得出它的邊;佛境隨眾生之機而現身現智,也一樣量不出邊。落地處在這裡:不必到別處去找不可思議,你此刻起心動念的這個「隨思即顯」,就是不可思議最現成的樣本。法藏也是這麼繫的——「然智必依心,故云心境界也。」

龍不離本處,而雨遍大地

第一喻:大龍王隨心降雨,那雨不從內出、不從外出;如來境界也是這樣,隨思惟分別而無量顯現,在十方之中悉無來處。

先問一句:雨明明落下來了,怎麼會沒有來處?若說從龍身內出,龍身能有多少水;若說從身外來,那又何必待龍起心。內外都推不去,於是只好說:隨心而有,無所從來。澄觀正是判這一喻為喻「無縛無脫」:「既無來處,有何縛脫耶?」——來處都沒有,束縛與解脫從哪裡安立?法藏則判為「喻佛依心無本智」。

要排的誤解是:這不是說雨是假的。雨是真的落了,大地是真的濕了;只是它的「有」不是搬運來的有。佛的顯現同此:眾生見佛聞法,受用是真實的,而佛並沒有從某處動身過來。落到讀者處,這一喻解掉一個很深的執:我們總以為感應是佛『從那邊來了』,其實是心淨則現,如龍雨之隨心。

海水從願來

第二喻緊接著:大海水皆從龍王心力所起;諸佛一切智海也是這樣,都從如來往昔大願所生起。

前喻說「無來處」,這喻補上「所因」——澄觀說得清楚:「後明海水從心喻,喻無縛脫所因。水從心力為因,非定內外。智從昔願,緣起故來即無來。」無來處不等於無因,只是那個因不落在內外的框子裡。佛的智海不是無端現成的一片汪洋,它有來歷,來歷是往昔那個願。

這一句也是〈如來出現〉整品的骨。所謂「出現」,不是本無今有地冒出來一個佛,而是舊願到此現行——法藏索性把本義的科名寫作「明性起境界」。對讀者最實的一著在這裡:你今天發的願,將來就是你智慧的海。願有多深,海就有多深;沒有發過的願,成不了將來的水。

四天下的河:先把「多」老老實實說到底

第三喻是全段篇幅最長的一段,卻最容易被略過——因為它看起來只是一串數字。閻浮提二千五百河、西拘耶尼五千河、東弗婆提七千五百河、北欝單越一萬河,共二萬五千河相續不絕流入大海。說完普賢還要停下來問一句:「此水多不?」大眾答:「甚多。」

為什麼要這樣鋪?因為要顯「不及」,必先把「多」說到極致。澄觀科此喻為四節:一四洲水、二龍王雨水、三宮殿出水、四娑竭龍王兼雨兼出,並點出通則——「皆後後倍前以顯深廣」。這是一個往上疊的階梯,每一階都比前一階大一倍。

讀者若嫌數字瑣碎,正好錯過了經文的用心:這一大段的功能不是報數,是替後面那句「百分不及一」預先築台。台築得越高,那一句摔下來的落差才越真。

八十億龍王輪番倍加

階梯繼續往上:十光明龍王雨海之水倍過前,百光明龍王又倍前;大莊嚴、摩那斯、雷震、難陀跋難陀、無量光明、連霔不斷、大勝、大奮迅——如是八十億諸大龍王各雨大海,展轉倍過於前;娑竭羅龍王太子閻浮幢,又倍前。然後同樣一輪從頭再來一遍:這些龍王宮殿中的水流入大海,又各各倍前。最後是娑竭羅龍王自己,連雨大海、宮殿涌出,再倍於前;其水紺瑠璃色,涌出有時,所以大海的潮汐不失時。

那一句「潮不失時」不是閒筆。澄觀釋云:「涌出故潮上,速為寶消故潮下,此為極說。」水涌出所以潮漲,水為寶所消所以潮落——極說者,說到不能再說之處。經文把「多」推到語言的盡頭,順手還交代了潮汐這件世人日日看見卻不解其故的事。

於是普賢再問一次:「彼大海為無量不?」這一次大眾的答語變了——「實為無量,不可為諭。」不是「甚多」了,是『無法譬喻』。台,築到頂了。

說到盡頭仍要說:譬喻不及

台築到頂,經文一句把它推倒:這大海的無量,比起如來智海的無量,「百分不及一,千分不及一,乃至優波尼沙陀分不及其一」;而且明說——「但隨眾生心為作譬諭,而佛境界非譬所及。」

這是本義最見誠實的地方。設了那麼長一個喻,末了自己聲明喻不及。讀者要在這裡排掉兩個相反的誤解:一是以為既然說了譬喻,佛境就大約如此,於是把海當成佛境的尺寸——不是,海只是隨你的心作的一個方便;二是以為既然不及,那譬喻就白設了——也不是,若不曾隨著河、隨著龍雨一階一階爬到「不可為諭」,你根本不知道被推倒的是多高的台。先給你一個量,再告訴你這個量不夠,你才會第一次感覺到「不可思議」四個字的重量。澄觀合此段云:「佛智一念即無窮盡,況盡三際、周乎十方,重重重重,安可喻顯?」

四種無量:智海·寶聚·眾生·住地

喻推倒了,法卻要合。經文以四句「應知」收束:應知如來智海無量,因為從初發心修一切菩薩行不斷;應知寶聚無量,因為一切菩提分法、三寶種不斷;應知所住眾生無量,因為一切有學、無學、聲聞、獨覺於中受用;應知住地無量,因為從初歡喜地乃至究竟無障礙地諸菩薩所居。

這四句正對前面大海的四樣:水、眾寶、眾生、所依大地。法藏把對位點得很清楚:「初發心等,合海中水無量;二道品等,合海中末尼等寶無量;三無量眾生等,合海中眾生無量;四大地等,合海中有大地無量也。」澄觀還補一句要緊的:「非唯智為佛境,菩提分等皆分齊境也。」——佛的境界不只是那個智,連法、連受用者、連菩薩所居的階位,全都算在佛境的分齊之內。

讀者可以就此回看自己:你所學的每一分法,是那海裡的寶;你此刻站的位置,是那大地的一寸。佛境無量,而你並不在它之外。

結:知佛境,是為了利生

長行的最後一句把整段的用意收回人間:「菩薩摩訶薩為入無量智慧利益一切眾生故,於如來、應、正等覺境界應如是知。」澄觀釋此總結云:「即結云知意,不知佛境安能利生?」——說明白了為什麼要知:不是為了增長見識,是因為不知佛境的人,利益眾生也利益不到底。所發的心有多大,取決於所見的果有多大;所見的果若小,行也就小。這一句,把前面所有的無量、所有的譬喻,全部繫回到「利益一切眾生」這一件事上。

重頌五偈

長行說完,普賢以五偈重明。澄觀科之云:「五偈分二:初一頌法說;餘頌前喻」——初一偈頌心境界,次二偈頌龍雨與佛身無來去,後二偈頌大海宏深。

頌中只有一處是長行不曾明說而頌獨標的:「十力牟尼亦如是,無所從來無所去,若有淨心則現身,量等法界入毛孔。」長行以龍雨喻境之無來處,頌則直接把『無來無去』安在佛身上,並補出現身的條件——「若有淨心」。這是把前面所有的義理落到讀者身上的一句:佛不從外來,來的是你心的淨。而「量等法界入毛孔」一語,身量與法界齊等,卻入一個毛孔——大小之礙在此消息。

其餘四偈皆對位長行,不重出新義:頌心境界者對心境界段,頌龍雨者對龍雨喻,頌海中珍奇眾生大地者對四無量,末偈「有學無學住地人,悉在其中得饒益」對四無量之法合。

承衍

本義為華嚴宗性起義之經據所在。法藏於六十本逕以「性起境界」標科,並以「境智不二名非境界」釋十境之末句;智海從往昔大願生起一義,即果德非新造而是舊願現行之說所本。澄觀則於八十本開「分齊之境」與「所緣之境」二軌,並以二諦、三諦、五界三重攝十境。二家於十句之攝開合不同(澄觀前五俗、次三真、九通、後一雙非;法藏初五俗、後五真);法藏別出三性一軌(初五依他、次四圓成、後一遍計),為澄觀所不出;頌數之判,澄觀依八十本作五偈,法藏依六十本作十偈——二家所疏之本本異,古有異說,誌錄之,不判。

異譯之異亦誌於考據:六十本第三洲河數作八千四百、總數作二萬五千九百,八十本作七千五百、二萬五千;六十本「非境界境界」即八十本「無境界境界」,「如如不壞」即「真如無差別」。照實錄,不強解。

至於《起信論》、《華嚴一乘教義分齊章》以及成唯識、攝論、瑜伽諸論,於本義之專屬牒句皆零命中——本義無唯識軸承衍之直接文據,據實標闕,不以他處之文充之。

Why We Should Ask about ‘the Realm of the Tathāgata’

The portion before this spoke of the mind and intent of the Tathāgata — that is the wisdom which knows; and this portion turns of a sudden to ask: then the object that this wisdom faces, what is that? Samantabhadra opens with a question: “How should the bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the realm of the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One?” The manner of the asking is worth noticing. He does not ask ‘what is the realm of the Tathāgata’, but ‘how should a bodhisattva know it’. The realm itself is past thinking; the way by which the realm may be known can nevertheless be pointed out.

Some will suppose that, the Buddha’s realm being past thinking, there is no need to ask at all, and that asking is asking in vain. This is the first misunderstanding that the portion means to clear away. Chengguan judges this passage thus: it directly displays the realm that is the bounds, and along with it sets forth the realm that is the object; and of the preceding portion and this one he says that “the two senses complete each other, as a lid answers to its box” — the former makes clear the wisdom that knows, and this one sets forth what that wisdom takes as object, for it is because the object is boundless that the bounds of the wisdom are seen to be hard to think; and conversely, it is because those bounds are hard to think that the object can be exhausted. Fazang marks this section outright as “making clear the realm of nature-arising,” and puts it still more plainly: “since there was already the great wisdom that is able to know, now what is known is made clear.”

So this question is not the opening of some abstruse talk; it is the opening of practice. Only when you know how great the fruit-virtue of a buddha is do you know how great the thought you arouse ought to be. And the scriptural text at once places in your hands the very rod by which the Buddha’s realm is measured — and that rod is not up in the heavens.

The Ten Realms: Counting from the World All the Way to “the Realm That Is No Realm”

Samantabhadra first gives the condition of the one who is able to know: “with wisdom that has no obstruction and no hindrance.” Chengguan puts it very hard: “he first has one take unobstructed wisdom as that which is able to know, because without this one cannot measure the Buddha’s realm.” Fazang says the same: “if one does not obtain this measureless and boundless wisdom, there is no way to speak of the vast realm.” Without this rod, not one of the ten clauses below can be measured at all.

Then the ten realms are laid out: the world, the three times, the lands, the dharmas, sentient beings, suchness without difference, the Dharma realm without obstruction, the true limit without bound, empty space without measure, and the realm that is no realm. These ten clauses are not strung together at random. Chengguan allots them clause by clause: the first raises in general those who are to be transformed; the second is the time of the transforming; the third the place of it; the fourth the dharma used in it; the fifth the persons transformed. The sixth, seventh, and eighth all speak of what is realized — suchness names the substance, and because it is constantly of one taste it is called without difference; the Dharma realm is that upon which beings and dharmas depend, and so is called unobstructed; the true limit is the exhausting of affairs to their reality, and so is called without bound. The ninth is the bounds of the place of transforming, and the last runs through all of them universally.

What must be guarded against is reading these ten clauses as ten separate things heaped together. They are ten faces of one thing: from the world, which is the coarsest, they gather inward to suchness and the true limit, which are the finest, and then gather in further to that one clause where even the name “realm” will not stand. The sequence gathers inward; it does not spread outward.

“The Realm That Is No Realm”: This One Clause Is the Eye of the Whole Passage

At the end of the ten clauses it says of a sudden that “the realm that is no realm is the realm of the Tathāgata” — that realm which is no realm is the realm of the Tathāgata. Of all the sentences here this is the easiest to read as mystification. What it does is in fact something very exact: it gathers up, all at once, the nine clauses that went before. Chengguan says: “the last is a double negation, displaying that the nine realms before are the same as not being.”

Fazang’s explanation goes a step nearer. He first distinguishes: “as for saying ‘the realm that is not a realm’, it is because it is not a realm transformed by consciousness that it speaks so.” It is not that sort of realm, the sort that consciousness turns out. Any realm that consciousness turns out must stand over against the consciousness that takes it as its object: where there is this, there is that. The Buddha’s realm is not a realm of that kind. And so he says further: “the tenth is that realm and wisdom are not two, and this is named no realm; because it is a realm not other than wisdom it is named no realm, and it is just this no-realm that is taken as the realm of the Tathāgata.” Realm and wisdom are no longer two; the realm is not some further end lying outside wisdom — this is what is called “no realm,” and it is precisely this “no realm” that is set up as the realm of the Tathāgata.

Brought down to where the reader stands: if you are still picturing ‘a landscape, exceedingly vast, that a buddha sees’, that is still a realm turned out by consciousness, still two ends. What the portion means to say is that at the ground of buddhahood the knower and the known are no longer parted, and therefore the Buddha’s realm cannot be treated as an object and pointed at. That it cannot be pointed at is not because it is too far off; it is because it is not over against you.

Because the Realm Is Measureless the Wisdom Is Measureless; Because the Realm Is Nowhere the Buddha Too Is Nowhere

The ten realms listed, the scriptural text at once makes two rounds of extension. The first: the realm of all worlds is measureless, and the realm of the Tathāgata is measureless too; the realm of the three times is measureless, and the realm of the Tathāgata is measureless too; and so on even to this, that the realm which is no realm is measureless, and the realm of the Tathāgata is measureless too. Chengguan explains this as “because realm and wisdom answer to each other, both are measureless” — realm and wisdom are a pair that answer to each other, and to measure the realm is to measure the wisdom.

The second round matters more: “just as that realm which is no realm is in no place at all to be found, so it is with the realm of the Tathāgata — in no place at all is it to be found.” Having just spoken of realms of every kind, it now says of a sudden that in no place at all is it to be found. Is this not self-contradictory? It is not. Chengguan follows it admirably: “afterwards, with respect to no-realm, he displays that it is not existent, even to this, that suchness itself cannot be got at. And therefore the realms rise like clouds and are yet constantly still.” The realms rise like clouds and are yet of themselves constantly still — the clouds are indeed up in the sky, and yet you cannot seize a piece of cloud and hold it in your hand. To be everywhere, and to be at a place that can be pointed at, are two different things. Readers commonly misread ‘nowhere absent’ as ‘pointed at everywhere’; here the portion cuts that misreading off.

Measuring the Buddha’s Realm with Your Own Mind

Here the scriptural text makes a turn that takes one by surprise: “the bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know that the realm of the mind is the realm of the Tathāgata.” That rod for measuring the Buddha’s realm turns out to be this one thought of yours, now.

The text gives the realm of the mind four qualifiers: measureless, boundless, without bondage, without release. Chengguan reads them in two halves: “‘measureless and boundless’ speaks of the breadth of its characteristic and function; ‘without bondage and without release’ makes clear the depth and stillness of its substance and nature.” The first pair speaks of function, the second of substance. Then the text raises a question of itself: why is this? And it answers: “because it is in just such and such a way that the mind ponders and discriminates, and in just such and such a way that measureless things appear.” Chengguan states the sense of this question and answer very plainly: “the bodhisattva’s own mind displays according as he thinks, and therefore has no measure. The Buddha’s realm is so as well, manifesting according to what meets it, whether body or wisdom — how should it have measure?”

One misunderstanding to be cleared away: this is not saying ‘your mind is the Buddha’s realm, and so you are already a buddha’. What the text uses is comparison — comparing the far by the near, taking something you experience every day and have never looked at closely, in order to compare with it something you have never experienced at all. Your mind appears just as you think, and no one has ever measured its far edge; the Buddha’s realm manifests body and wisdom according to the capacities of beings, and its edge likewise cannot be measured. Here is where it comes to ground: you need not go elsewhere to look for the inconceivable — this ‘displaying according as you think’, in the very stirring of your thought at this moment, is the readiest sample of the inconceivable there is. Fazang ties it in the same way: “yet wisdom must depend upon mind, and therefore it says ‘the realm of the mind’.”

The Dragon Does Not Leave His Own Place, and Yet the Rain Covers the Earth

The first simile: a great dragon king sends down rain according to his mind, and that rain comes neither from within nor from without; and so it is with the realm of the Tathāgata, which appears measurelessly according to pondering and discriminating, while in the ten directions there is nowhere at all that it comes from.

Ask one question first: the rain plainly falls — how can it have no place it comes from? If you say it comes out from inside the dragon’s body, how much water can the dragon’s body hold; if you say it comes in from outside the body, then why must it wait upon the dragon’s mind. Neither within nor without will serve, and so one can only say: it is there according to the mind, and there is nowhere it comes from. Chengguan is exactly the one who judges this simile a simile for “without bondage and without release”: “since there is no place it comes from, what bondage or release should there be?” — if there is no place it comes from at all, on what are bondage and release to be set up? Fazang for his part judges it “a simile for the wisdom of a buddha which depends on mind and has no root.”

The misunderstanding to be cleared away is this: it is not saying that the rain is unreal. The rain has really fallen, the earth is really wet; only, its ‘being there’ is not a being there carried in from somewhere. The manifesting of a buddha is the same: when beings see the Buddha and hear the Dharma, what they receive is real, and yet the Buddha has not set out from some place and come. Brought down to the reader, this simile undoes a very deep clinging: we always suppose that a response is the Buddha ‘having come over from that side’, whereas in truth it is that where the mind is pure it appears, as the dragon’s rain follows the mind.

The Ocean’s Water Comes from the Vow

The second simile follows at once: the water of the great ocean all arises from the power of the dragon king’s mind, and the ocean of all-knowing wisdom of all the buddhas is likewise, arising from the great vows the Tathāgata made in ages past.

The former simile spoke of “no place it comes from”; this one supplies “that from which it comes.” Chengguan states it clearly: “afterwards he makes clear the simile of the ocean’s water arising from mind, a simile for that on which the absence of bondage and release depends. The water has the power of mind for its cause, and is not fixed as within or without. Wisdom comes from the vow of long ago, and because it arises from conditions its coming is a coming that is no coming.” To have no place it comes from is not to be without a cause; only, that cause does not fall within the frame of within and without. The Buddha’s ocean of wisdom is not some expanse of water ready-made out of nothing; it has a provenance, and the provenance is that vow of long ago.

This sentence is also the bone of the whole Chapter on the Appearance of the Tathāgata. What is called “appearance” is not that a buddha springs up where formerly there was none, but that an old vow comes now into act — which is why Fazang simply writes the name of this portion’s section as “making clear the realm of nature-arising.” The most solid stroke of all for the reader lies here: the vow you make today is the ocean of your wisdom hereafter. As deep as the vow, so deep the ocean; a vow never made will never become water later on.

The Rivers of the Four Continents: First Say Out Honestly, to the End, How Much “Much” Is

The third simile is the longest stretch of the whole portion, and yet the easiest to skip over — because it looks like nothing but a string of numbers. Two thousand five hundred rivers in Jambudvīpa, five thousand in Godānīya of the west, seven thousand five hundred in Pūrvavideha of the east, ten thousand in Uttarakuru of the north: twenty-five thousand rivers in all, flowing on without break into the great ocean. And having said it, Samantabhadra still stops to ask: “is this water much or not?” The great assembly answers: “very much indeed.”

Why lay it out in this way? Because in order to display “does not reach,” one must first say “much” to its utmost. Chengguan outlines this simile in four sections: first the water of the four continents, second the rain-water of the dragon kings, third the water pouring from the palaces, fourth Sāgara both raining and pouring forth; and he points out the general rule — “in each the later doubles the earlier, so as to display the depth and breadth.” This is a stairway mounting upward, each step twice the one below it.

Should the reader find the numbers trifling, he has just missed what the text is at: the work of this long stretch is not to report figures but to build a platform beforehand for the sentence that comes after, “does not amount to one part in a hundred.” The higher the platform is built, the more real is the drop when that sentence throws it down.

Eighty Koṭis of Dragon Kings Doubling by Turns

The stairway goes on up: the water that the dragon king Ten Lights rains into the sea doubles what went before, and Hundred Lights doubles it again; Great Adornment, Manasvin, Thunder-Peal, Nanda and Upananda, Measureless Light, Unceasing Downpour, Great Victor, Great Rousing — eighty koṭis of great dragon kings such as these each send down rain upon the great ocean, turn after turn doubling what went before; and Jambu Banner, the crown prince of the dragon king Sāgara, doubles it again. Then the same round comes over once more from the beginning: the water in the palaces of these dragon kings flows into the great ocean, and each again doubles what went before. Last comes Sāgara himself, raining upon the sea without break and pouring up from his palace, doubling once more; and his water is of the colour of dark-blue beryl, and wells up at a set season, and therefore the tides of the great ocean do not miss their time.

That sentence, “the tides do not miss their time,” is no idle stroke. Chengguan explains: “because it wells up, the tide rises; because it is swiftly consumed by the jewels, the tide falls — this is speaking to the utmost.” The water wells up and so the tide rises; the water is consumed by the jewels and so the tide falls — and “speaking to the utmost” means speaking to the place beyond which one cannot speak. The text pushes “much” to the very end of language, and in passing accounts as well for the tides, a thing men see every day and do not understand.

And so Samantabhadra asks once more: “is that great ocean measureless or not?” This time the answer of the assembly has changed — “it is measureless indeed, and cannot be told by any simile.” It is no longer “very much”; it is ‘beyond any simile’. The platform has been built to its top.

Having Spoken to the End, He Must Still Speak: The Simile Does Not Reach

The platform built to its top, the text throws it down in a single sentence: this measurelessness of the great ocean, set against the measurelessness of the Tathāgata’s ocean of wisdom, “does not amount to one part in a hundred, nor to one part in a thousand, nor even to one part of the upaniṣad part”; and it says so outright — “it is only in accordance with the minds of sentient beings that a simile is made for them, and the Buddha’s realm is not what a simile can reach.”

This is the most honest place in the whole portion. Having set up so long a simile, at the end it declares of itself that the simile does not reach. Here the reader must clear away two opposite misunderstandings. The first is to suppose that, since a simile has been given, the Buddha’s realm is roughly of that size, and so to take the ocean for the measurement of the Buddha’s realm — it is not so; the ocean is only an expedient made to suit your mind. The second is to suppose that, since it does not reach, the simile was set up for nothing — that is not so either; had you not climbed, step by step, by the rivers and by the dragons’ rain, up to “it cannot be told by any simile,” you would not know at all how high the platform was that has been thrown down. First you are given a measure, and then you are told that this measure is not enough; and only then do you feel, for the first time, the weight of the words “past thinking.” Chengguan gathers the passage thus: “the Buddha’s wisdom in a single thought is already without end; how much more, exhausting the three limits of time and encompassing the ten directions, layer upon layer upon layer — how should a simile display it?”

The Four Measureless Things: The Ocean of Wisdom · the Mass of Jewels · Sentient Beings · the Ground They Dwell On

The simile thrown down, the dharma must still be joined to it. The text gathers up with four clauses of “should know”: he should know that the Tathāgata’s ocean of wisdom is measureless, because from the first arousing of the thought he has cultivated all the practices of a bodhisattva without break; he should know that the mass of jewels is measureless, because all the factors of awakening and the lineage of the Three Jewels have never been cut off; he should know that the sentient beings who dwell there are measureless, because all the learners and those beyond learning, the śrāvakas and the pratyekabuddhas, take their enjoyment therein; he should know that the ground they dwell on is measureless, because from the first Joyful Ground to the ultimate Ground of No Obstruction the bodhisattvas dwell there.

These four clauses answer exactly to the four things of the great ocean before: the water, the many jewels, the sentient beings, and the great earth upon which it rests. Fazang points the correspondence out very clearly: “the first arousing of the thought and the rest are joined to the measurelessness of the water in the ocean; the second, the factors of the path and the rest, are joined to the measurelessness of the maṇi and other jewels in the ocean; the third, measureless sentient beings and the rest, are joined to the measurelessness of the sentient beings in the ocean; the fourth, the great earth and the rest, are joined to the measurelessness of the great earth that the ocean has.” And Chengguan adds a sentence that matters: “it is not that wisdom alone is the Buddha’s realm; the factors of awakening and the rest are all realms that are the bounds.” The realm of a buddha is not that wisdom only; the dharmas, those who take the enjoyment, and even the stages on which the bodhisattvas dwell are all counted within the bounds of the Buddha’s realm.

Here the reader may look back at himself: every portion of Dharma you have learned is one of the jewels in that ocean; the place where you stand at this moment is an inch of that great earth. The Buddha’s realm is measureless, and you are not outside it.

Conclusion: To Know the Buddha’s Realm Is for the Benefit of Beings

The last sentence of the prose brings the whole intent of the passage back to the human world: “for the sake of entering measureless wisdom and benefiting all sentient beings, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know in this way the realm of the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One.” Chengguan explains this general conclusion: “that is, it concludes by stating the intent of knowing: not knowing the Buddha’s realm, how should one be able to benefit beings?” — it makes plain why one must know: not for the increase of learning, but because one who does not know the Buddha’s realm cannot benefit beings to the end. How great a thought one arouses is settled by how great a fruit one sees; and if the fruit one sees is small, the practice too will be small. This one sentence ties all the measurelessness and all the similes that went before back to the single matter of “benefiting all sentient beings.”

The Five Repeated Verses

The prose ended, Samantabhadra makes the meaning clear again in five verses. Chengguan outlines them thus: “the five verses divide in two: the first one is a verse on the exposition in terms of dharma; the rest are verses on the similes that went before” — the first verse is on the realm of the mind, the next two on the dragon’s rain and on the Buddha’s body neither coming nor going, and the last two on the vastness and depth of the great ocean.

There is only one place in the verses where something is marked that the prose never stated outright: “The Muni who is furnished with the ten powers is likewise so: there is nowhere he comes from and nowhere he goes; and if there be one whose mind is pure, the Buddha manifests his body before him — a body whose measure equals the Dharma realm, and yet able to enter a single pore.” The prose used the dragon’s rain as a simile for the realm’s having no place it comes from; the verse sets ‘neither coming nor going’ directly upon the body of the Buddha, and supplies besides the condition of that manifesting — “if there be one whose mind is pure.” This is the sentence that brings all the foregoing doctrine down onto the reader: the Buddha does not come from outside; what comes is the purity of your mind. And in “a body whose measure equals the Dharma realm, and yet able to enter a single pore,” the measure of the body equals the Dharma realm and yet it enters one pore — here is where the obstruction between great and small gives way.

The remaining four verses all answer to the prose and bring out no new doctrine: the verse on the realm of the mind answers to the passage on the realm of the mind; the verse on the dragon’s rain answers to the simile of the dragon’s rain; the verse on the rare treasures, the sentient beings, and the great earth within the ocean answers to the four measureless things; and the last verse, “the learners, those beyond learning, and those who dwell on the grounds all obtain abundant benefit within it,” answers to the joining of the dharma to the four measureless things.

Lineage

This portion is where the scriptural ground of the Huayan house’s sense of nature-arising lies. Fazang, upon the sixty-fascicle text, marks the section outright as “the realm of nature-arising,” and explains the last of the ten clauses by “realm and wisdom being not two is named no realm”; and the sense that the ocean of wisdom arises from the great vows of long ago is the ground of the teaching that the fruit-virtue is not newly made but is an old vow coming into act. Chengguan, upon the eighty-fascicle text, opens two tracks, ‘the realm that is the bounds’ and ‘the realm that is the object’, and gathers the ten realms under three schemes, the two truths, the three truths, and the five realms. The two houses differ in how they gather and divide the ten clauses (Chengguan: the first five conventional, the next three real, the ninth running through both, the last a double negation; Fazang: the first five conventional, the latter five real); Fazang sets out besides one track of the three natures (the first five other-dependent, the next four perfectly accomplished, the last one wholly imagined), which Chengguan does not give. As to the reckoning of the number of the verses, Chengguan, following the eighty-fascicle text, makes five verses, and Fazang, following the sixty-fascicle text, makes ten — the texts the two commented upon are themselves different. There were divergent explanations among the ancients; they are recorded here, and no judgment is made.

The divergences of the parallel translation are likewise recorded in the apparatus: the sixty-fascicle text gives the number of the rivers of the third continent as eight thousand four hundred and the total as twenty-five thousand nine hundred, while the eighty-fascicle text gives seven thousand five hundred and twenty-five thousand; the sixty-fascicle ‘the realm that is not a realm’ is the eighty-fascicle ‘the realm that is no realm’, and ‘suchness undestroyed’ is ‘suchness without difference’. They are recorded as they stand, without forcing an explanation.

As for the Dasheng qixin lun, the Awakening of Faith, and the Huayan yisheng jiaoyi fenqi zhang, and for the Cheng weishi lun, the She dacheng lun, and the Yuqie shidi lun — in all of them the clauses that would quote this portion specifically are simply not found. This portion has no direct textual warrant for a lineage along the consciousness-only axis; the lack is recorded in accordance with fact, and nothing from elsewhere is used to fill it.

考據Apparatus

第五義『出現之境界』=普賢答「菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺境界」。先列十境(世間·三世·剎·法·眾生·真如無差別·法界無障礙·實際無邊際·虛空無分量·無境界境界),次以類推顯無量、顯一切處無有;後近取眾生自心以況佛境,設大龍隨心降雨喻、海水從龍王心力起喻、海水宏深喻三喻,末合為智海·寶聚·眾生·住地四種無量而結。澄觀判此段「正顯分齊之境,兼辨所緣之境」,法藏判為「明性起境界」;十境之「無境界境界」,法藏釋為境智不二之境——此為本義最險亦最要之一句。


一、科判定位

科判系統此義之位
底本 T279 三十九品品三十七 如來出現品(第七會 重會普光明殿)·第五義 出現之境界〔T10n0279 0273c06〕起–〔0274b17〕前訖
澄觀《華嚴經疏》第五明出現境界〔T35n1735 0880c08〕起–〔0881b03〕前訖;長行分三=標·釋·結,末辨偈頌五偈
澄觀《隨疏演義鈔》本範圍內未見獨立標題科起(鈔隨疏逐句注·未逐句配對)〔查無〕
法藏《探玄記》(六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品〉疏)第五明性起境界〔T35n1733 0412a04〕起–〔0412b17〕前訖;先徵問·後顯釋,顯釋三分
李通玄《新華嚴經論》本義專屬起訖科段未見(李通玄於本品立四門、長科兩段〔T36n1739 0938a07/0939a22–26〕,於境界義僅「眾生境界是如來境界」〔0940b23〕一句總攝,無專科)〔查無〕

來意與二義相成——澄觀繫此第五義於前第四『出現之心意』,明能知之智與所知之境互成:

「已下入第五十二經第五明出現境界,正顯分齊之境,兼辨所緣之境。依初義者,前約智以顯心,此正明智用分齊。依後義者,前明能知,今辨所緣,由所緣無邊故,顯分齊難思,分齊難思故,方窮所緣之境。二義相成,如函蓋相稱。」〔T35n1735 0880c08〕

法藏繫之同揆,而標名作「性起境界」:

「第五明性起境界。前既有能知大智,今明所知境也。於中,先徵問、後顯釋。顯釋亦三:先舉能知、二顯所知、三總結彼知。」〔T35n1733 0412a04〕

長行三分(澄觀)——

「文中,長行分三,謂標、釋、結。釋中二:先法、後喻。法中亦二:先廣取所緣,顯分齊境;後近取諸心,以況佛境。前中又二:先列所緣無邊、後顯分齊無量。」〔T35n1735 0880c13〕

喻段之內科:

「文有三喻:前二喻無縛無脫;後一喻無量無邊,無量無邊通前二段。」〔T35n1735 0881a10〕

「喻中三:初別顯水多,文有四節:一四洲水、二龍王雨水、三宮殿出水、四娑竭龍王兼雨兼出,皆後後倍前以顯深廣。」〔T35n1735 0881a18〕

法藏三喻之判:

「喻中有三:初龍王心雨喻,喻佛依心無本智;二海從龍願喻,喻佛心願所起智;三海水宏深喻,喻佛深廣無涯智。」〔T35n1733 0412b05〕

總結分——澄觀:「大文第三總結。即結云知意,不知佛境安能利生?」〔T35n1735 0881a27〕


二、術語

漢所徵精義
無障無礙智慧本義「菩薩摩訶薩以無障無礙智慧,知一切世間境界是如來境界」〔T10n0279 0273c07〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕能知之智;澄觀:「先令以無障礙智為能知者,非此不能量佛境故。」〔T35n1735 0880c16〕法藏:「若不得此無量無邊智,無由得說廣大境也。」〔T35n1733 0412a07〕
真如無差別境界十境之第六澄觀:「於中真如語其體,常一味故,云無差別。」〔T35n1735 0880c20〕
法界無障礙境界十境之第七澄觀:「法界生法所依,故云無礙實際。」〔T35n1735 0880c20〕;法藏:「七法界用無礙」〔T35n1733 0412a19〕
實際無邊際境界十境之第八澄觀:「是窮事至實,故云無邊。」〔T35n1735 0880c21〕;法藏:「八體用俱實」〔T35n1733 0412a20〕
無境界境界十境之第十法藏:「言非境界境界者,非是識所變境故云也。」〔T35n1733 0412a11〕又:「十境智不二名非境界,以不異智之境名為非境,即以此非境為如來境。」〔0412a23〕
心境界本義「菩薩摩訶薩應知心境界是如來境界」〔T10n0279 0273c16〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕澄觀:「無量無邊,語其相用廣大。無縛無脫,明其體性深寂。」〔T35n1735 0881a05〕;法藏:「然智必依心,故云心境界也。」〔T35n1733 0412a28〕
一切智海本義「諸佛如來一切智海亦復如是,皆從如來往昔大願之所生起」〔T10n0279 0273c24〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕智海從願起;法藏以之為『分齊境』:「此下約分齊明境,即以如來智慧大海為分齊境。」〔T35n1733 0412b04〕
優波尼沙陀分本義「乃至優波尼沙陀分不及其一」〔T10n0279 0274a25〕〔T10n0279 0274a〕校量之極微分名;本經以之收『百分·千分』之列,顯譬喻終不及佛境
娑竭羅龍王/閻浮幢本義「娑竭羅龍王太子,名:閻浮幢」〔T10n0279 0274a09〕〔T10n0279 0274a〕諸龍王倍雨之極;60 本作「娑伽羅龍王太子,名曰佛生」〔T09n0278 0625b20〕
潮不失時本義「其所出水紺瑠璃色,涌出有時,是故大海潮不失時」〔T10n0279 0274a20〕〔T10n0279 0274a〕澄觀:「涌出故潮上,速為寶消故潮下,此為極說。」〔T35n1735 0881a21〕
住地無量本義「從初歡喜地乃至究竟無障礙地諸菩薩所居故」〔T10n0279 0274b02〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕四無量之第四;以十地菩薩所居況大海所依之大地

三、譬喻·修辭

(一) 大龍王隨心降雨喻——「佛子!如大龍王隨心降雨,其雨不從內出、不從外出。如來境界亦復如是,隨於如是思惟分別,則有如是無量顯現,於十方中悉無來處。」〔T10n0279 0273c20〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕:

  • 喻依:龍王隨心而雨,雨不從內外來。
  • 喻體:如來境界隨思惟分別而無量顯現,十方悉無來處。
  • 所顯義:澄觀判為喻「無縛無脫」——「前明降雨無從喻,正喻無縛脫。既無來處,有何縛脫耶?」〔T35n1735 0881a12〕法藏判為「喻佛依心無本智」〔T35n1733 0412b06〕。

(二) 海水從龍王心力起喻——「佛子!如大海水,皆從龍王心力所起。諸佛如來一切智海亦復如是,皆從如來往昔大願之所生起。」〔T10n0279 0273c23〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕:

  • 喻依:大海之水皆從龍王心力而起。
  • 喻體:諸佛一切智海皆從往昔大願生起。
  • 所顯義:澄觀:「後明海水從心喻,喻無縛脫所因。水從心力為因,非定內外。智從昔願,緣起故來即無來。」〔T35n1735 0881a13〕法藏:「二海從龍願喻,喻佛心願所起智」〔T35n1733 0412b06〕。

(三) 海水宏深喻——四節倍前:四洲河水〔0273c–0274a〕· 八十億龍王雨水〔0274a〕· 諸龍王宮殿出水〔0274a〕· 娑竭羅龍王兼雨兼出〔0274a〕:

  • 喻依:二萬五千河相續入海,而諸龍王之雨與宮殿之水後後倍前。
  • 喻體:如來智海之深廣。
  • 所顯義:澄觀判「二海水宏深喻,喻無量無邊」〔T35n1735 0881a15〕,其內為標章誡聽·喻顯·法合三段;法藏「三海水宏深喻,喻佛深廣無涯智」〔T35n1733 0412b07〕。

(四) 四種無量之合喻——「如是大海,其水無量,眾寶無量,眾生無量,所依大地亦復無量。」〔T10n0279 0274a21〕〔T10n0279 0274a〕合為智海·寶聚·所住眾生·住地四無量:

「後合大海中有四種無量:初發心等,合海中水無量;二道品等,合海中末尼等寶無量;三無量眾生等,合海中眾生無量;四大地等,合海中有大地無量也。」〔T35n1733 0412b11〕

澄觀合中亦二:「先合水無量。佛智一念即無窮盡,況盡三際、周乎十方,重重重重,安可喻顯?」〔T35n1735 0881a23〕又「非唯智為佛境,菩提分等皆分齊境也。」〔0881a26〕

(五) 喻之自限——經文於喻末自破其喻:「但隨眾生心為作譬諭,而佛境界非譬所及。」〔T10n0279 0274a26〕〔T10n0279 0274a〕——設喻而復言喻不及,為本義修辭之樞。

(六) 頌中毛孔喻——重頌「若有淨心則現身,量等法界入毛孔」〔T10n0279 0274b12〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕;60 本作「無量諸境界,悉從心緣起,一切諸法界,皆入一毛道」〔T09n0278 0626a05〕。


四、異譯對勘

本義之漢譯校本:實叉難陀 T279(底本·〈如來出現品第三十七〉第五義)· 佛馱跋陀羅 T278(晉譯六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品第三十二〉之三〔T09n0278 0625a14〕起–〔0626a15〕前訖)。本義無別行經、無牒經論釋〔查無〕。以下逐句全錄不判。

句一 列十境

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279知一切世間境界是如來境界,知一切三世境界、一切剎境界、一切法境界、一切眾生境界、真如無差別境界、法界無障礙境界、實際無邊際境界、虛空無分量境界、無境界境界是如來境界。T10n0279 0273c
佛馱 T278此菩薩摩訶薩成就無量無邊無礙智慧,知一切眾生,是如來境界。一切世間、一切剎、一切法、一切眾生行,如如不壞境界、無礙法界境界、實際無際境界、無量虛空境界、非境界境界,是如來境界。T09n0278 0625a15

異文所繫:(甲) 80「真如無差別境界」↔ 60「如如不壞境界」。(乙) 80「無境界境界」↔ 60「非境界境界」。(丙) 60 於十境前別出「知一切眾生,是如來境界」一句,又列「一切眾生行」,與 80「一切眾生境界」開合異。(丁) 80「虛空無分量」↔ 60「無量虛空」。

句二 類推無量與一切處無有

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如無境界境界一切處無有,如來境界亦如是一切處無有。T10n0279 0273c
佛馱 T278非境界至一切處而無所至,如來境界亦復如是。T09n0278 0625a22

異文所繫:80 作「一切處無有」,60 作「至一切處而無所至」——遍與不至之表法句式異。

句三 心境界

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如心境界無量無邊、無縛無脫,如來境界亦無量無邊、無縛無脫。何以故?以如是如是思惟分別,如是如是無量顯現故。T10n0279 0273c
佛馱 T278如心境界無量故,如來境界無量。何以故?隨心無量,出生智慧亦復如是。T09n0278 0625a24

異文所繫:80 具「無縛無脫」一對,60 無之;澄觀正依「無縛無脫」立體性深寂之釋〔T35n1735 0881a05〕,法藏於六十本則作「釋云隨心無量生智亦爾也」〔T35n1733 0412a29〕。

句四 大龍隨心降雨喻

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如大龍王隨心降雨,其雨不從內出、不從外出。如來境界亦復如是,隨於如是思惟分別,則有如是無量顯現,於十方中悉無來處。T10n0279 0273c
佛馱 T278譬如大龍隨心降雨,雨不從內亦不從外;如來境界,亦復如是,隨心所念,於念念中出生無量不思議智。彼諸智慧,悉無來處。T09n0278 0625a26

異文所繫:80「無量顯現」↔ 60「出生無量不思議智」——所顯者,80 就境說、60 就智說。

句五 四天下河流之數

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279此閻浮提有二千五百河流入大海,西拘耶尼有五千河流入大海,東弗婆提有七千五百河流入大海,北欝單越有一萬河流入大海。T10n0279 0273c
實叉 T279(總數)此四天下,如是二萬五千河相續不絕流入大海。T10n0279 0274a
佛馱 T278此閻浮提內流出二千五百河水,悉入大海。俱耶尼內流出五千河水,悉入大海。弗婆提內流出八千四百河水,悉入大海。欝單越內流出一萬河水,悉入大海。T09n0278 0625b04
佛馱 T278(總數)此四天下內如是二萬五千九百河水,悉入大海。T09n0278 0625b08

異文所繫:弗婆提之數 80 作「七千五百」、60 作「八千四百」;總數 80 作「二萬五千」、60 作「二萬五千九百」。二本各自內合(80 四數合為二萬五千;60 四數合為二萬五千九百,與總標相符〔T09n0278 0625b04/b08〕)。照實錄,不強解。

句六 龍王名列

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279大莊嚴龍王、摩那斯龍王、雷震龍王、難陀跋難陀龍王、無量光明龍王、連霔不斷龍王、大勝龍王、大奮迅龍王T10n0279 0274a
佛馱 T278大莊嚴龍王…摩那斯龍王…大雷龍王…難陀跋難陀龍王…無量光明龍王…流注不斷龍王…大勝龍王…金剛光明龍王T09n0278 0625b12

異文所繫:(甲) 80「雷震」↔ 60「大雷」。(乙) 80「連霔不斷」↔ 60「流注不斷」。(丙) 80 第十作「大奮迅龍王」、60 作「金剛光明龍王」。(丁) 太子名 80「閻浮幢」↔ 60「佛生」;龍王名 80「娑竭羅」↔ 60「娑伽羅」。(戊) 80 作「宮殿」、60 作「所住淵池」。

句七 海水四無量與潮

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279其所出水紺瑠璃色,涌出有時,是故大海潮不失時。佛子!如是大海,其水無量,眾寶無量,眾生無量,所依大地亦復無量。T10n0279 0274a
佛馱 T278彼涌流水青瑠璃色,盈滿大海,涌出有時。是故,海潮常不失時。佛子!如是大海,其水無量、珍寶無量、眾生無量、大地無量。T09n0278 0625c08

異文所繫:80「紺瑠璃色」↔ 60「青瑠璃色」;80「眾寶」↔ 60「珍寶」;80「所依大地」↔ 60「大地」。

句八 結所知

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279佛子!菩薩摩訶薩為入無量智慧利益一切眾生故,於如來、應、正等覺境界應如是知。T10n0279 0274b
佛馱 T278佛子!是為菩薩摩訶薩知、見如來、應供、等正覺境界,無量饒益一切眾生無量智慧故。T09n0278 0625c20

異文所繫:(甲) 佛號 80 作「如來、應、正等覺」、60 作「如來、應供、等正覺」。(乙) 80 通篇作「知」,60 作「知、見」二字連舉。

句九 重頌首偈

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如心境界無有量,諸佛境界亦復然;如心境界從意生,佛境如是應觀察。T10n0279 0274b
佛馱 T278離垢淨境界,無量不可稱,殊勝願力故,一切無有量。T09n0278 0625c24

異文所繫:(甲) 80 頌為七言五偈,60 頌為五言。(乙) 60 首偈「離垢淨境界」一頌為 80 所無,80 逕以心境界起頌。(丙) 頌數之判:澄觀於八十本作「第二偈頌。五偈分二:初一頌法說;餘頌前喻。」〔T35n1735 0881a29〕,法藏於六十本作「頌中十偈,初二頌法說、次四頌初二喻」〔T35n1733 0412b15〕——二本頌數本異,二疏各依所疏之本,全錄不判。


五、宗義之經據〔眼〕

(一) 無境界境界=境智不二——十境之末句「無境界境界是如來境界」〔T10n0279 0273c11〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕,法藏之釋為本義宗眼所在:

「十境智不二名非境界,以不異智之境名為非境,即以此非境為如來境。」〔T35n1733 0412a23〕

又簡別識境:「言非境界境界者,非是識所變境故云也。」〔0412a11〕澄觀則以雙非收前九:「後一雙非,顯前九境即同無故。」〔T35n1735 0880c24〕——境窮至無境,方是佛境,此即性起門下『所知即能知』之經據。

(二) 近取自心以況佛境——「菩薩摩訶薩應知心境界是如來境界」〔T10n0279 0273c16〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕。澄觀釋徵意:

「次徵意云:何以將心況於佛境?釋意云:菩薩自心隨思即顯,故無分量。佛境亦爾,隨機顯現若身若智,何有量耶?智假思顯則性無縛脫,不為相縛後無脫故。」〔T35n1735 0881a06〕

法藏亦云「然智必依心,故云心境界也」〔T35n1733 0412a28〕——以眾生現前一心為量佛境之尺,是本義最切近讀者之一著。

(三) 智海從願起(性起義)——「諸佛如來一切智海亦復如是,皆從如來往昔大願之所生起。」〔T10n0279 0273c24〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕法藏標本義科名逕作「明性起境界」〔T35n1733 0412a04〕;澄觀釋為「智從昔願,緣起故來即無來」〔T35n1735 0881a15〕——果德之現,非新造而是舊願所起,是〈如來出現〉一品之骨。

(四) 分齊之境與所緣之境——澄觀開二義:「正顯分齊之境,兼辨所緣之境」〔T35n1735 0880c08〕;法藏開同二義:「境界有二義,上來十種約所緣明境;此下約分齊明境,即以如來智慧大海為分齊境。」〔T35n1733 0412b03〕——境之一名而含所緣、分齊二軌,是讀本義不致混漫之關鍵。

(五) 毛孔遍容之經據——重頌「量等法界入毛孔」〔T10n0279 0274b12〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕、60 本「一切諸法界,皆入一毛道」〔T09n0278 0626a06〕——後世華嚴宗以『廣狹自在無礙門』等說法界重重,其品內經據之一即此頌〔誌錄不判〕。


六、諸家異釋(古德·標宗)

澄觀《華嚴經疏》T35n1735(八十華嚴逐文·主)

十句所緣之科:

「後正顯所緣,文有十句:一通舉所化。二化時。三化處。四化法。五所化人。六七八三皆明所證,於中真如語其體,常一味故,云無差別。法界生法所依,故云無礙實際。是窮事至實,故云無邊。九化處分齊。後一遍通。」〔T35n1735 0880c17〕

三重攝判(二諦·三諦·五界):

「若約二諦境,前五為俗、次三為真,九通真俗,事空理空俱是空故。後一雙非,顯前九境即同無故。若約三諦,空即是真,三真為中道。若以五界攝之,初三是世界無量,四即調伏及調伏加行界,五即眾生,次三即法界,餘二雙非。」〔T35n1735 0880c22〕

顯分齊無量:

「先約十境以顯分齊,境智相稱故皆無量;後約無境顯其非有,乃至真如皆不可得故。是以諸境雲興而常寂也。」〔T35n1735 0880c28〕

法藏《探玄記》T35n1733(六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品〉疏)

五義釋十境:

「前中有五義:一約二諦境,初五約俗量智境、後五約真理智境。言非境界境界者,非是識所變境故云也。二約三性境,初五依他性、次四圓成實、後一遍計所執。三約五海境,初一眾生海;次二及第九世界海;次二是根欲性海;次三是法界海;後一是佛海,謂佛智是非境故。四約前〈明難品〉,佛境十種相攝可知。」〔T35n1733 0412a10〕

釋文十句:

「五釋文中,初一是所化;二是化所依時,三世劫等;三所化處;四化所用法;五化所成行;六法界體不壞;七法界用無礙;八體用俱實。」〔T35n1733 0412a17〕

三大之又釋:

「又釋:此三,初真如體大;次相大,具恒沙功德名法界,迭不相妨名無礙;後體相無二名實際。又釋:此三如次,即三無性真如。九虛空是事無為境。」〔T35n1733 0412a20〕

李通玄《新華嚴經論》T36n1739

本義專屬科段未見(李通玄於本品立四門、長科兩段〔T36n1739 0938a07/0939a22–26〕,於境界義僅「眾生境界是如來境界」〔0940b23〕一句總攝,無專科)——〔查無〕。

澄觀《隨疏演義鈔》T36n1736

本範圍內未見獨立標題科起——〔查無〕。

誌錄不判:十境之攝,澄觀以二諦、三諦、五界三重攝之,法藏以二諦、三性、五海、〈明難品〉十相、釋文五義攝之;二家於十句之攝開合不同(澄觀作「前五為俗、次三為真」,九通真俗、後一雙非;法藏作「初五約俗量智境、後五約真理智境」);法藏別出三性一軌(初五依他·次四圓成·後一遍計),為澄觀所不出。頌數之判,澄觀依八十本作五偈、法藏依六十本作十偈。三性軌與二諦軌孰為正釋、二本頌數之開合——古有異說,誌錄之,不判。


七、互讀·承衍

  • 六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品〉〔T09n0278 0625a14–0626a15 前〕:本義之異譯全本,場景結構全同(十境·龍雨·海從願起·四洲河數·八十億龍王倍雨·四無量·結·重頌),逐句對勘見目四。
  • 華嚴宗性起義:法藏於六十本逕以「性起境界」標本義之科〔T35n1733 0412a04〕;智海從往昔大願起、境智不二而名非境——性起門之經據在此。〔誌錄不判〕
  • 《大乘起信論》T32n1666:以「如來智海」「性起」檢之,0 命中——〔查無〕。
  • 法藏《華嚴一乘教義分齊章》T45n1866:本義「如來境界」之獨立牒句未見(其引性起品諸句屬『性起品說十心』一類,不繫本義)——〔查無〕。
  • 承衍論(成唯識論 T31n1585 · 攝大乘論 T31n1594 · 瑜伽師地論 T30n1579):以「如來智海」『龍王雨海』檢之,0 命中——〔查無〕。本義無唯識軸承衍之直接牒文,據實標闕,不以他處之文充之。

八、校本定位

  • 實叉 T279(底本):品三十七〈如來出現品〉第五義 出現之境界〔T10n0279 0273c06〕起–〔0274b17〕前訖(第七會 重會普光明殿)。段序:徵問與十境列〔0273c〕· 類推無量〔0273c〕· 心境界〔0273c〕· 龍雨喻〔0273c〕· 海從龍心起喻〔0273c〕· 標章誡聽與四洲河數〔0273c–0274a〕· 龍王倍雨與宮殿出水〔0274a〕· 潮不失時與四無量〔0274a〕· 海不及智海〔0274a〕· 四無量法合與總結〔0274a–0274b〕· 重頌五偈〔0274b〕。 〔誌錄·出處粒度〕本義 80 本逐句繫行級出處;未能唯一定位者以欄級出處標之。
  • 佛馱 T278(晉譯主對校):〈寶王如來性起品第三十二〉之三〔T09n0278 0625a14〕起–〔0626a15〕前訖。十境 0625a15 · 一切處無所至 0625a22 · 心境界 0625a24 · 龍雨喻 0625a26 · 海從龍願 0625a29 · 誡聽 0625b02 · 四洲河數 0625b04(總數 0625b08)· 龍王雨水 0625b10 · 淵池水 0625b21 · 潮不失時與四無量 0625c08 · 海不及智海 0625c13 · 四無量法合 0625c15 · 結 0625c20 · 重頌起 0625c23(首偈 0625c24 · 毛道頌 0626a06)。
  • 澄觀《疏》T35n1735:第五明出現境界 0880c08 起–0881b03 前訖。來意二義 0880c08 · 長行三分 0880c13 · 能知之智 0880c16 · 十句所緣 0880c17 · 三重攝判 0880c22 · 顯分齊無量 0880c28 · 心境界正明 0881a03 · 無縛無脫釋 0881a05 · 徵釋 0881a06 · 三喻總判 0881a10 · 前二喻釋 0881a12 · 海水宏深喻科 0881a15 · 喻中三節 0881a18 · 潮相 0881a21 · 法合 0881a23 · 通顯無量 0881a25 · 總結 0881a27 · 偈頌五偈 0881a29。《鈔》T36n1736:本範圍獨立科起〔查無〕。
  • 法藏《探玄記》T35n1733:第五明性起境界 0412a04 起–0412b17 前訖。科名與三分 0412a04 · 能知 0412a07 · 十境五義 0412a10 · 釋文十句 0412a17 · 三大又釋 0412a20 · 境智不二 0412a23 · 約智顯廣三分 0412a26 · 隨心無量 0412a29 · 境界二義 0412b03 · 三喻 0412b05 · 法合四無量 0412b11 · 總結與頌科 0412b15。
  • 李通玄《論》T36n1739:本義專屬科段〔查無〕。
  • 異讀:本單元 T279 範圍〔0273c06〕–〔0274b16〕內大正校記 6 條,逐條照錄不判(底本【大】|他本異讀;多本異讀以/分列):〔0274a07〕霔【大】*|澍【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】*(*同校並繫〔0274a14〕〔0274b09〕之霔字) · 〔0274a13〕震【大】|覆【聖】 · 〔0274a19〕出【大】|山【宋】 · 〔0274a19〕入【大】|八【聖】 · 〔0274a24〕諭【大】*|喻【宋】【元】【明】【宮】*(*同校並繫〔0277a15〕〔0277b21〕〔0277b23〕之諭字) · 〔0274a24〕如來【大】|如是【聖】。(*=大正星號同校,該校並繫本文其餘同字處;T279 XML 於此類未出 corresp 重出位,故只呈星號、不另造錨)夾注已於原典層剝除誌錄。

The fifth portion, ‘the realm of the appearance’, is Samantabhadra’s answer to 「菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺境界」 tr. “how should the bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the realm of the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One” . He first lists the ten realms (the world · the three times · the lands · the dharmas · sentient beings · suchness without difference · the Dharma realm without obstruction · the true limit without bound · empty space without measure · the realm that is no realm); next, by extension, he displays that they are measureless and that in no place at all are they to be found; afterwards he takes the nearest thing, the minds of sentient beings, in order to compare with them the realm of a buddha, setting up three similes — the great dragon sending down rain according to his mind, the ocean’s water arising from the power of the dragon king’s mind, and the vastness and depth of the ocean’s water — and at the end joins them into four measureless things, the ocean of wisdom · the mass of jewels · sentient beings · the ground they dwell on, and so concludes. Chengguan judges this passage 「正顯分齊之境,兼辨所緣之境」 tr. “it directly displays the realm that is the bounds, and along with it sets forth the realm that is the object” , and Fazang judges it as 「明性起境界」 tr. “making clear the realm of nature-arising” ; and as for 「無境界境界」 tr. “the realm that is no realm” among the ten realms, Fazang explains it as the realm in which realm and wisdom are not two — this is the most perilous and the most vital sentence of the portion.


I. Doctrinal Outline and Placement

Outline systemThe place of this portion within it
The base text T279, in thirty-nine chaptersChapter thirty-seven, The Appearance of the Tathāgata (the seventh assembly, the return to the palace of Universal Light) · the fifth portion, the realm of the appearance, 〔T10n0279 0273c06〕 onward, ending just before 〔0274b17〕
Chengguan, Huayan jing shuThe fifth, making clear the realm of the appearance, 〔T35n1735 0880c08〕 onward, ending just before 〔0881b03〕; the prose divides in three — the heading · the explanation · the conclusion — and at the end the five verses are set forth
Chengguan, Yanyi chaoWithin this range no independently titled section-opening is seen (the Chao follows the Shu and annotates clause by clause; it does not pair off clause by clause) 〔not found〕
Fazang, Tanxuan ji (the commentary on the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka, the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata)The fifth, making clear the realm of nature-arising, 〔T35n1733 0412a04〕 onward, ending just before 〔0412b17〕; first the raising of the question, afterwards the display and explanation, the display and explanation being in three
Li Tongxuan, Xin Huayan jing lunNo section belonging specifically to this portion is seen (Li Tongxuan sets up four gates for this chapter and outlines two long sections 〔T36n1739 0938a07/0939a22–26〕; on the sense of the realm he has only the single sentence 「眾生境界是如來境界」 tr. “the realm of sentient beings is the realm of the Tathāgata” 〔0940b23〕 gathering it up, with no section proper to it) 〔not found〕

The reason for its coming, and the two senses completing each other — Chengguan ties this fifth portion to the fourth that precedes it, ‘the mind and intent of the appearance’, making clear that the wisdom which is able to know and the realm which is known complete each other:

「已下入第五十二經第五明出現境界,正顯分齊之境,兼辨所緣之境。依初義者,前約智以顯心,此正明智用分齊。依後義者,前明能知,今辨所緣,由所緣無邊故,顯分齊難思,分齊難思故,方窮所緣之境。二義相成,如函蓋相稱。」 tr. “From here begins the fifty-second scroll of the scripture, the fifth, making clear the realm of the appearance; it directly displays the realm that is the bounds, and along with it sets forth the realm that is the object. Taking it by the first sense: before, the mind was displayed with respect to wisdom, and here the bounds of the working of wisdom are directly made clear. Taking it by the latter sense: before, what is able to know was made clear, and now what is taken as object is set forth; because the object is boundless, the bounds are displayed to be hard to think, and because the bounds are hard to think, the object can thereupon be exhausted. The two senses complete each other, as a lid answers to its box.” 〔T35n1735 0880c08〕

Fazang ties it by the same measure, and gives it the name 「性起境界」 tr. “the realm of nature-arising”:

「第五明性起境界。前既有能知大智,今明所知境也。於中,先徵問、後顯釋。顯釋亦三:先舉能知、二顯所知、三總結彼知。」 tr. “The fifth, making clear the realm of nature-arising. Since there was already the great wisdom that is able to know, now what is known is made clear. Within it, first the question is raised, afterwards it is displayed and explained. The display and explanation is likewise in three: first, raising what is able to know; second, displaying what is known; third, concluding that knowing in general.” 〔T35n1733 0412a04〕

The prose in three parts (Chengguan) —

「文中,長行分三,謂標、釋、結。釋中二:先法、後喻。法中亦二:先廣取所緣,顯分齊境;後近取諸心,以況佛境。前中又二:先列所緣無邊、後顯分齊無量。」 tr. “Within the text, the prose divides in three, namely the heading, the explanation, and the conclusion. Within the explanation there are two: first by way of dharma, afterwards by way of simile. Within the dharma there are likewise two: first he takes the object broadly, displaying the realm that is the bounds; afterwards he takes minds as the nearest thing, so as to compare with them the realm of a buddha. Within the former there are two again: first the listing of the object as boundless, afterwards the displaying of the bounds as measureless.” 〔T35n1735 0880c13〕

The inner outline of the section of similes:

「文有三喻:前二喻無縛無脫;後一喻無量無邊,無量無邊通前二段。」 tr. “The text has three similes: the first two are similes for being without bondage and without release; the last is a simile for being measureless and boundless, and measureless and boundless runs through the two passages before it.” 〔T35n1735 0881a10〕

「喻中三:初別顯水多,文有四節:一四洲水、二龍王雨水、三宮殿出水、四娑竭龍王兼雨兼出,皆後後倍前以顯深廣。」 tr. “Within the simile there are three: the first separately displays that the water is much, and the text has four sections — first the water of the four continents, second the rain-water of the dragon kings, third the water pouring from the palaces, fourth the dragon king Sāgara both raining and pouring forth; and in each the later doubles the earlier, so as to display the depth and breadth.” 〔T35n1735 0881a18〕

Fazang’s judgment of the three similes:

「喻中有三:初龍王心雨喻,喻佛依心無本智;二海從龍願喻,喻佛心願所起智;三海水宏深喻,喻佛深廣無涯智。」 tr. “Within the simile there are three: first the simile of the dragon king’s raining according to his mind, a simile for the wisdom of a buddha which depends on mind and has no root; second the simile of the ocean arising from the dragon’s vow, a simile for the wisdom that arises from the vow of a buddha’s mind; third the simile of the vastness and depth of the ocean’s water, a simile for the deep and broad and shoreless wisdom of a buddha.” 〔T35n1733 0412b05〕

The concluding part — Chengguan: 「大文第三總結。即結云知意,不知佛境安能利生?」 tr. “The third part of the main text is the general conclusion. That is, it concludes by stating the intent of knowing: not knowing the Buddha’s realm, how should one be able to benefit beings?” 〔T35n1735 0881a27〕


II. Terminology

ChineseWhere attestedThe essential sense
Wisdom that has no obstruction and no hindranceThis portion: 「菩薩摩訶薩以無障無礙智慧,知一切世間境界是如來境界」 tr. “the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, with wisdom that has no obstruction and no hindrance, knows that the realm of all worlds is the realm of the Tathāgata” 〔T10n0279 0273c07〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕The wisdom that is able to know; Chengguan: 「先令以無障礙智為能知者,非此不能量佛境故。」 tr. “he first has one take unobstructed wisdom as that which is able to know, because without this one cannot measure the Buddha’s realm.” 〔T35n1735 0880c16〕 Fazang: 「若不得此無量無邊智,無由得說廣大境也。」 tr. “if one does not obtain this measureless and boundless wisdom, there is no way to speak of the vast realm.” 〔T35n1733 0412a07〕
The realm of suchness without differenceThe sixth of the ten realmsChengguan: 「於中真如語其體,常一味故,云無差別。」 tr. “among these, suchness names its substance, and because it is constantly of one taste it is called without difference.” 〔T35n1735 0880c20〕
The realm of the Dharma realm without obstructionThe seventh of the ten realmsChengguan: 「法界生法所依,故云無礙實際。」 tr. “the Dharma realm is that upon which beings and dharmas depend, and therefore it is called unobstructed; the true limit —” 〔T35n1735 0880c20〕; Fazang: 「七法界用無礙」 tr. “seventh, the function of the Dharma realm is unobstructed” 〔T35n1733 0412a19〕
The realm of the true limit without boundThe eighth of the ten realmsChengguan: 「是窮事至實,故云無邊。」 tr. “this is the exhausting of affairs to their reality, and therefore it is called without bound.” 〔T35n1735 0880c21〕; Fazang: 「八體用俱實」 tr. “eighth, substance and function are both real” 〔T35n1733 0412a20〕
The realm that is no realmThe tenth of the ten realmsFazang: 「言非境界境界者,非是識所變境故云也。」 tr. “as for saying ‘the realm that is not a realm’, it is because it is not a realm transformed by consciousness that it speaks so.” 〔T35n1733 0412a11〕 And again: 「十境智不二名非境界,以不異智之境名為非境,即以此非境為如來境。」 tr. “the tenth is that realm and wisdom are not two, and this is named no realm; because it is a realm not other than wisdom it is named no realm, and it is just this no-realm that is taken as the realm of the Tathāgata.” 〔0412a23〕
The realm of the mindThis portion: 「菩薩摩訶薩應知心境界是如來境界」 tr. “the bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know that the realm of the mind is the realm of the Tathāgata” 〔T10n0279 0273c16〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕Chengguan: 「無量無邊,語其相用廣大。無縛無脫,明其體性深寂。」 tr. “‘measureless and boundless’ speaks of the breadth of its characteristic and function; ‘without bondage and without release’ makes clear the depth and stillness of its substance and nature.” 〔T35n1735 0881a05〕; Fazang: 「然智必依心,故云心境界也。」 tr. “yet wisdom must depend upon mind, and therefore it says ‘the realm of the mind’.” 〔T35n1733 0412a28〕
The ocean of all-knowing wisdomThis portion: 「諸佛如來一切智海亦復如是,皆從如來往昔大願之所生起」 tr. “so too is the ocean of all-knowing wisdom of all the buddhas and tathāgatas: it all arises from the great vows that the Tathāgata made in ages past” 〔T10n0279 0273c24〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕The ocean of wisdom arises from the vow; Fazang takes it as ‘the realm that is the bounds’: 「此下約分齊明境,即以如來智慧大海為分齊境。」 tr. “from here on the realm is made clear with respect to the bounds, that is, the great ocean of the Tathāgata’s wisdom is taken as the realm that is the bounds.” 〔T35n1733 0412b04〕
The upaniṣad partThis portion: 「乃至優波尼沙陀分不及其一」 tr. “nor even one part of the upaniṣad part” 〔T10n0279 0274a25〕〔T10n0279 0274a〕The name of the utterly minute part used in comparative measure; this scripture uses it to close the series of ‘one part in a hundred · one part in a thousand’, displaying that in the end the simile does not reach the Buddha’s realm
The dragon king Sāgara / Jambu BannerThis portion: 「娑竭羅龍王太子,名:閻浮幢」 tr. “the crown prince of the dragon king Sāgara, named: Jambu Banner” 〔T10n0279 0274a09〕〔T10n0279 0274a〕The utmost of the dragon kings’ doubling of the rain; the sixty-fascicle text has 「娑伽羅龍王太子,名曰佛生」 tr. “the crown prince of the dragon king Sāgara, named Buddha-Born” 〔T09n0278 0625b20〕
The tides do not miss their timeThis portion: 「其所出水紺瑠璃色,涌出有時,是故大海潮不失時」 tr. “the water that he pours forth is of the colour of dark-blue beryl, and it wells up at a set season, and for this reason the tides of the great ocean do not miss their time” 〔T10n0279 0274a20〕〔T10n0279 0274a〕Chengguan: 「涌出故潮上,速為寶消故潮下,此為極說。」 tr. “because it wells up, the tide rises; because it is swiftly consumed by the jewels, the tide falls — this is speaking to the utmost.” 〔T35n1735 0881a21〕
The measurelessness of the ground they dwell onThis portion: 「從初歡喜地乃至究竟無障礙地諸菩薩所居故」 tr. “because from the first Joyful Ground to the ultimate Ground of No Obstruction the bodhisattvas dwell there” 〔T10n0279 0274b02〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕The fourth of the four measureless things; the dwelling place of the bodhisattvas of the ten grounds is compared with the great earth upon which the ocean rests

III. Similes and Rhetoric

(1) The simile of the great dragon king sending down rain according to his mind — 「佛子!如大龍王隨心降雨,其雨不從內出、不從外出。如來境界亦復如是,隨於如是思惟分別,則有如是無量顯現,於十方中悉無來處。」 tr. “Sons of the Buddha! It is like a great dragon king sending down rain according to his own mind: that rain does not come forth from within, nor does it come in from without. So it is too with the realm of the Tathāgata: according to such pondering and discriminating there are such measureless appearings, and yet within the ten directions there is nowhere at all that they come from.” 〔T10n0279 0273c20〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕:

  • The ground of the simile: the dragon king rains according to his mind, and the rain comes neither from within nor from without.
  • The thing likened: the realm of the Tathāgata appears measurelessly according to pondering and discriminating, and in the ten directions there is nowhere at all that it comes from.
  • The sense displayed: Chengguan judges it a simile for 「無縛無脫」 tr. “without bondage and without release” — 「前明降雨無從喻,正喻無縛脫。既無來處,有何縛脫耶?」 tr. “the former makes clear the simile of the rain’s coming down from nowhere, which directly likens the absence of bondage and release. Since there is no place it comes from, what bondage or release should there be?” 〔T35n1735 0881a12〕 Fazang judges it as 「喻佛依心無本智」 tr. “a simile for the wisdom of a buddha which depends on mind and has no root” 〔T35n1733 0412b06〕.

(2) The simile of the ocean’s water arising from the power of the dragon king’s mind — 「佛子!如大海水,皆從龍王心力所起。諸佛如來一切智海亦復如是,皆從如來往昔大願之所生起。」 tr. “Sons of the Buddha! It is like the water of the great ocean, which all arises from the power of the mind of the dragon king. So it is too with the ocean of all-knowing wisdom of all the buddhas and tathāgatas: it all arises from the great vows that the Tathāgata made in ages past.” 〔T10n0279 0273c23〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕:

  • The ground of the simile: the water of the great ocean all arises from the power of the dragon king’s mind.
  • The thing likened: the ocean of all-knowing wisdom of all the buddhas all arises from the great vows of ages past.
  • The sense displayed: Chengguan: 「後明海水從心喻,喻無縛脫所因。水從心力為因,非定內外。智從昔願,緣起故來即無來。」 tr. “afterwards he makes clear the simile of the ocean’s water arising from mind, a simile for that on which the absence of bondage and release depends. The water has the power of mind for its cause, and is not fixed as within or without. Wisdom comes from the vow of long ago, and because it arises from conditions its coming is a coming that is no coming.” 〔T35n1735 0881a13〕 Fazang: 「二海從龍願喻,喻佛心願所起智」 tr. “second, the simile of the ocean arising from the dragon’s vow, a simile for the wisdom that arises from the vow of a buddha’s mind” 〔T35n1733 0412b06〕.

(3) The simile of the vastness and depth of the ocean’s water — four sections, each doubling the one before: the river-water of the four continents 〔0273c–0274a〕 · the rain-water of the eighty koṭis of dragon kings 〔0274a〕 · the water pouring from the palaces of the dragon kings 〔0274a〕 · the dragon king Sāgara both raining and pouring forth 〔0274a〕:

  • The ground of the simile: twenty-five thousand rivers flow on without break into the ocean, while the rain of the dragon kings and the water of their palaces each doubles the one before.
  • The thing likened: the depth and breadth of the Tathāgata’s ocean of wisdom.
  • The sense displayed: Chengguan judges it 「二海水宏深喻,喻無量無邊」 tr. “second, the simile of the vastness and depth of the ocean’s water, a simile for being measureless and boundless” 〔T35n1735 0881a15〕, and within it there are three passages — setting out the heading and bidding them listen · displaying the simile · joining the dharma to it; Fazang: 「三海水宏深喻,喻佛深廣無涯智」 tr. “third, the simile of the vastness and depth of the ocean’s water, a simile for the deep and broad and shoreless wisdom of a buddha” 〔T35n1733 0412b07〕.

(4) The joining of the simile in four measureless things — 「如是大海,其水無量,眾寶無量,眾生無量,所依大地亦復無量。」 tr. “Such is the great ocean: its water is measureless, its many jewels are measureless, its sentient beings are measureless, and the great earth upon which it rests is likewise measureless.” 〔T10n0279 0274a21〕〔T10n0279 0274a〕 is joined as the four measureless things, the ocean of wisdom · the mass of jewels · the sentient beings who dwell there · the ground they dwell on:

「後合大海中有四種無量:初發心等,合海中水無量;二道品等,合海中末尼等寶無量;三無量眾生等,合海中眾生無量;四大地等,合海中有大地無量也。」 tr. “Afterwards it is joined to the four kinds of measurelessness in the great ocean: the first arousing of the thought and the rest are joined to the measurelessness of the water in the ocean; the second, the factors of the path and the rest, are joined to the measurelessness of the maṇi and other jewels in the ocean; the third, measureless sentient beings and the rest, are joined to the measurelessness of the sentient beings in the ocean; the fourth, the great earth and the rest, are joined to the measurelessness of the great earth that the ocean has.” 〔T35n1733 0412b11〕

Within Chengguan’s joining there are likewise two: 「先合水無量。佛智一念即無窮盡,況盡三際、周乎十方,重重重重,安可喻顯?」 tr. “first the joining of the measurelessness of the water. The Buddha’s wisdom in a single thought is already without end; how much more, exhausting the three limits of time and encompassing the ten directions, layer upon layer upon layer — how should a simile display it?” 〔T35n1735 0881a23〕 And again 「非唯智為佛境,菩提分等皆分齊境也。」 tr. “it is not that wisdom alone is the Buddha’s realm; the factors of awakening and the rest are all realms that are the bounds.” 〔0881a26〕

(5) The simile’s limiting of itself — at the end of the simile the scriptural text breaks its own simile: 「但隨眾生心為作譬諭,而佛境界非譬所及。」 tr. “it is only in accordance with the minds of sentient beings that a simile is made for them, and the Buddha’s realm is not what a simile can reach.” 〔T10n0279 0274a26〕〔T10n0279 0274a〕 — to set up a simile and then to say that the simile does not reach is the pivot of this portion’s rhetoric.

(6) The simile of the pore within the verses — the repeated verses: 「若有淨心則現身,量等法界入毛孔」 tr. “if there be one whose mind is pure, the Buddha manifests his body before him — a body whose measure equals the Dharma realm, and yet able to enter a single pore” 〔T10n0279 0274b12〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕; the sixty-fascicle text has 「無量諸境界,悉從心緣起,一切諸法界,皆入一毛道」 tr. “the measureless realms of every kind all arise from the conditions of mind, and all the Dharma realms alike enter one hair’s path” 〔T09n0278 0626a05〕.


IV. Collation with Parallel Translations

The Chinese witnesses for this portion: Śikṣānanda T279 (the base text · the Chapter on the Appearance of the Tathāgata, the thirty-seventh, the fifth portion) · Buddhabhadra T278 (the Jin translation of the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka, the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata, the thirty-second, part three, 〔T09n0278 0625a14〕 onward, ending just before 〔0626a15〕). This portion has no separately circulating sūtra and no treatise that quotes and explains it 〔not found〕. What follows is recorded in full, sentence by sentence, without adjudication.

Sentence One The Listing of the Ten Realms

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279He knows that the realm of all worlds is the realm of the Tathāgata; he knows the realm of all three times, the realm of all lands, the realm of all dharmas, the realm of all sentient beings, the realm of suchness without difference, the realm of the Dharma realm without obstruction, the realm of the true limit without any bound, the realm of empty space without measure, and the realm that is no realm — these are the realm of the Tathāgata.T10n0279 0273c
Buddhabhadra T278This bodhisattva-mahāsattva, having accomplished measureless, boundless, unobstructed wisdom, knows all sentient beings — this is the realm of the Tathāgata. All worlds, all lands, all dharmas, the conduct of all sentient beings, the realm of suchness undestroyed, the realm of the Dharma realm unobstructed, the realm of the true limit without limit, the realm of measureless empty space, the realm that is not a realm — these are the realm of the Tathāgata.T09n0278 0625a15

Where the divergences lie: (a) the eighty 「真如無差別境界」 tr. “the realm of suchness without difference” ↔ the sixty 「如如不壞境界」 tr. “the realm of suchness undestroyed”. (b) The eighty 「無境界境界」 tr. “the realm that is no realm” ↔ the sixty 「非境界境界」 tr. “the realm that is not a realm”. (c) Before the ten realms the sixty sets out separately the clause 「知一切眾生,是如來境界」 tr. “he knows all sentient beings — this is the realm of the Tathāgata”, and lists besides 「一切眾生行」 tr. “the conduct of all sentient beings”, which differs in its gathering and dividing from the eighty’s 「一切眾生境界」 tr. “the realm of all sentient beings”. (d) The eighty 「虛空無分量」 tr. “empty space without measure” ↔ the sixty 「無量虛空」 tr. “measureless empty space”.

Sentence Two The Extension to Measurelessness and to Being Found in No Place

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279Just as that realm which is no realm is in no place at all to be found, so it is with the realm of the Tathāgata — in no place at all is it to be found.T10n0279 0273c
Buddhabhadra T278The realm that is not a realm reaches to every place and yet there is nothing it reaches; and so it is too with the realm of the Tathāgata.T09n0278 0625a22

Where the divergences lie: the eighty has 「一切處無有」 tr. “in no place at all is it to be found”, the sixty has 「至一切處而無所至」 tr. “reaches to every place and yet there is nothing it reaches” — the sentence-forms by which pervading and not-reaching are set forth differ.

Sentence Three The Realm of the Mind

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279Just as the realm of the mind is measureless and boundless, without bondage and without release, so the realm of the Tathāgata too is measureless and boundless, without bondage and without release. Why is this? Because it is in just such and such a way that the mind ponders and discriminates, and in just such and such a way that measureless things appear.T10n0279 0273c
Buddhabhadra T278Because the realm of the mind is measureless, the realm of the Tathāgata is measureless. Why is this? Following upon the mind’s being measureless, the wisdom brought forth is likewise so.T09n0278 0625a24

Where the divergences lie: the eighty has the pair 「無縛無脫」 tr. “without bondage and without release”, which the sixty lacks; Chengguan founds his explanation of the depth and stillness of substance and nature precisely upon 「無縛無脫」 tr. “without bondage and without release” 〔T35n1735 0881a05〕, while Fazang, upon the sixty-fascicle text, has 「釋云隨心無量生智亦爾也」 tr. “the explanation says that, following upon the mind’s being measureless, the arising of wisdom is likewise so” 〔T35n1733 0412a29〕.

Sentence Four The Simile of the Great Dragon Sending Down Rain according to His Mind

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279It is like a great dragon king sending down rain according to his own mind: that rain does not come forth from within, nor does it come in from without. So it is too with the realm of the Tathāgata: according to such pondering and discriminating there are such measureless appearings, and yet within the ten directions there is nowhere at all that they come from.T10n0279 0273c
Buddhabhadra T278It is like a great dragon sending down rain according to his mind, and the rain comes neither from within nor from without; and so it is too with the realm of the Tathāgata, which, according to what the mind bears in thought, brings forth in thought after thought measureless and inconceivable wisdom. Those wisdoms all have no place they come from.T09n0278 0625a26

Where the divergences lie: the eighty 「無量顯現」 tr. “measureless appearings” ↔ the sixty 「出生無量不思議智」 tr. “brings forth measureless and inconceivable wisdom” — as to what is displayed, the eighty speaks with respect to the realm and the sixty with respect to wisdom.

Sentence Five The Number of the Rivers of the Four Continents

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279In this Jambudvīpa there are two thousand five hundred rivers that flow into the great ocean; in Godānīya of the west there are five thousand rivers that flow into the great ocean; in Pūrvavideha of the east there are seven thousand five hundred rivers that flow into the great ocean; in Uttarakuru of the north there are ten thousand rivers that flow into the great ocean.T10n0279 0273c
Śikṣānanda T279 (the total)In these four continents, twenty-five thousand rivers such as these flow on without break into the great ocean.T10n0279 0274a
Buddhabhadra T278From within this Jambudvīpa there flow out two thousand five hundred rivers of water, and all enter the great ocean. From within Godānīya there flow out five thousand rivers of water, and all enter the great ocean. From within Pūrvavideha there flow out eight thousand four hundred rivers of water, and all enter the great ocean. From within Uttarakuru there flow out ten thousand rivers of water, and all enter the great ocean.T09n0278 0625b04
Buddhabhadra T278 (the total)From within these four continents, twenty-five thousand nine hundred rivers of water such as these all enter the great ocean.T09n0278 0625b08

Where the divergences lie: for the number of Pūrvavideha the eighty has 「七千五百」 tr. “seven thousand five hundred” and the sixty 「八千四百」 tr. “eight thousand four hundred”; for the total the eighty has 「二萬五千」 tr. “twenty-five thousand” and the sixty 「二萬五千九百」 tr. “twenty-five thousand nine hundred”. Each of the two texts is internally consistent (the four numbers of the eighty add to twenty-five thousand; the four numbers of the sixty add to twenty-five thousand nine hundred, agreeing with its own total 〔T09n0278 0625b04/b08〕). Recorded as they stand, without forcing an explanation.

Sentence Six The Roll of the Dragon Kings’ Names

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279the dragon king Great Adornment, the dragon king Manasvin, the dragon king Thunder-Peal, the dragon kings Nanda and Upananda, the dragon king Measureless Light, the dragon king Unceasing Downpour, the dragon king Great Victor, the dragon king Great RousingT10n0279 0274a
Buddhabhadra T278the dragon king Great Adornment … the dragon king Manasvin … the dragon king Great Thunder … the dragon kings Nanda and Upananda … the dragon king Measureless Light … the dragon king Unceasing Flow … the dragon king Great Victor … the dragon king Vajra LightT09n0278 0625b12

Where the divergences lie: (a) the eighty 「雷震」 tr. “Thunder-Peal” ↔ the sixty 「大雷」 tr. “Great Thunder”. (b) The eighty 「連霔不斷」 tr. “Unceasing Downpour” ↔ the sixty 「流注不斷」 tr. “Unceasing Flow”. (c) For the tenth the eighty has 「大奮迅龍王」 tr. “the dragon king Great Rousing” and the sixty 「金剛光明龍王」 tr. “the dragon king Vajra Light”. (d) The crown prince’s name in the eighty is 「閻浮幢」 tr. “Jambu Banner” ↔ in the sixty 「佛生」 tr. “Buddha-Born”; the dragon king’s name in the eighty is 「娑竭羅」 tr. “Sāgara” ↔ in the sixty 「娑伽羅」 tr. “Sāgara” (a differing transcription of the same name). (e) The eighty has 「宮殿」 tr. “palaces” and the sixty 「所住淵池」 tr. “the deep pools where they dwell”.

Sentence Seven The Four Measureless Things of the Ocean’s Water, and the Tide

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279The water that he pours forth is of the colour of dark-blue beryl, and it wells up at a set season, and for this reason the tides of the great ocean do not miss their time. Sons of the Buddha! Such is the great ocean: its water is measureless, its many jewels are measureless, its sentient beings are measureless, and the great earth upon which it rests is likewise measureless.T10n0279 0274a
Buddhabhadra T278That welling and flowing water is of the colour of blue beryl; it fills the great ocean full, and wells up at a set season. For this reason the ocean’s tide constantly does not miss its time. Sons of the Buddha! Such is the great ocean: its water is measureless, its precious jewels are measureless, its sentient beings are measureless, its great earth is measureless.T09n0278 0625c08

Where the divergences lie: the eighty 「紺瑠璃色」 tr. “of the colour of dark-blue beryl” ↔ the sixty 「青瑠璃色」 tr. “of the colour of blue beryl”; the eighty 「眾寶」 tr. “many jewels” ↔ the sixty 「珍寶」 tr. “precious jewels”; the eighty 「所依大地」 tr. “the great earth upon which it rests” ↔ the sixty 「大地」 tr. “the great earth”.

Sentence Eight The Conclusion of What Is to Be Known

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279Sons of the Buddha! For the sake of entering measureless wisdom and benefiting all sentient beings, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know in this way the realm of the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One.T10n0279 0274b
Buddhabhadra T278Sons of the Buddha! This is the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’s knowing and seeing of the realm of the Tathāgata, the Worthy of Offerings, the Rightly and Fully Awakened One, for the sake of measurelessly benefiting all sentient beings and of measureless wisdom.T09n0278 0625c20

Where the divergences lie: (a) for the epithets of the Buddha the eighty has 「如來、應、正等覺」 tr. “the Tathāgata, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Awakened One” and the sixty 「如來、應供、等正覺」 tr. “the Tathāgata, the Worthy of Offerings, the Rightly and Fully Awakened One”. (b) The eighty has throughout 「知」 tr. “knowing”, while the sixty raises the two graphs 「知、見」 tr. “knowing and seeing” together.

Sentence Nine The First of the Repeated Verses

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279Just as the realm of the mind has no measure, so too is the realm of all the buddhas; just as the realm of the mind is born of thought, so should the Buddha’s realm be contemplated.T10n0279 0274b
Buddhabhadra T278The realm pure and free of defilement is measureless and past telling; because of the power of surpassing vows, all of it is without measure.T09n0278 0625c24

Where the divergences lie: (a) the verses of the eighty are five verses of seven graphs to the line, those of the sixty are of five graphs. (b) The sixty’s first verse, 「離垢淨境界」 tr. “the realm pure and free of defilement”, is a verse that the eighty does not have; the eighty begins its verses directly with the realm of the mind. (c) As to the reckoning of the number of the verses: Chengguan, upon the eighty-fascicle text, has 「第二偈頌。五偈分二:初一頌法說;餘頌前喻。」 tr. “second, the verses. The five verses divide in two: the first one versifies the statement of the Dharma; the rest versify the foregoing similes.” 〔T35n1735 0881a29〕, and Fazang, upon the sixty-fascicle text, has 「頌中十偈,初二頌法說、次四頌初二喻」 tr. “within the verses there are ten: the first two are verses on the exposition in terms of dharma, the next four verses on the first two similes” 〔T35n1733 0412b15〕 — the number of verses in the two texts is itself different, and the two commentaries each follow the text they comment upon; recorded in full without adjudication.


V. Scriptural Grounds of Sectarian Doctrine (the eye)

(1) The realm that is no realm = realm and wisdom are not two — the last clause of the ten realms, 「無境界境界是如來境界」 tr. “the realm that is no realm is the realm of the Tathāgata” 〔T10n0279 0273c11〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕, and Fazang’s explanation of it is where the doctrinal eye of this portion lies:

「十境智不二名非境界,以不異智之境名為非境,即以此非境為如來境。」 tr. “the tenth is that realm and wisdom are not two, and this is named no realm; because it is a realm not other than wisdom it is named no realm, and it is just this no-realm that is taken as the realm of the Tathāgata.” 〔T35n1733 0412a23〕

And he distinguishes it from the realm of consciousness: 「言非境界境界者,非是識所變境故云也。」 tr. “as for saying ‘the realm that is not a realm’, it is because it is not a realm transformed by consciousness that it speaks so.” 〔0412a11〕 Chengguan for his part gathers up the nine that go before by a double negation: 「後一雙非,顯前九境即同無故。」 tr. “the last is a double negation, displaying that the nine realms before are the same as not being.” 〔T35n1735 0880c24〕 — when the realm is exhausted to no-realm, only then is it the realm of a buddha; this is the scriptural ground for ‘what is known is what is able to know’ under the gate of nature-arising.

(2) Taking the nearest thing, one’s own mind, to compare with it the realm of a buddha — 「菩薩摩訶薩應知心境界是如來境界」 tr. “the bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know that the realm of the mind is the realm of the Tathāgata” 〔T10n0279 0273c16〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕. Chengguan explains the intent of the question:

「次徵意云:何以將心況於佛境?釋意云:菩薩自心隨思即顯,故無分量。佛境亦爾,隨機顯現若身若智,何有量耶?智假思顯則性無縛脫,不為相縛後無脫故。」 tr. “Next, the intent of the question is: why compare the Buddha’s realm with mind? The intent of the explanation is: the bodhisattva’s own mind displays according as he thinks, and therefore has no measure. The Buddha’s realm is so as well, manifesting according to what meets it, whether body or wisdom — how should it have measure? Since wisdom is displayed by the borrowing of thought, its nature is without bondage or release, for it is not bound by marks and so is afterwards without release.” 〔T35n1735 0881a06〕

Fazang likewise says 「然智必依心,故云心境界也」 tr. “yet wisdom must depend upon mind, and therefore it says ‘the realm of the mind’” 〔T35n1733 0412a28〕 — to take the one mind that sentient beings have before them as the rod for measuring the Buddha’s realm is the stroke of this portion that comes nearest to the reader.

(3) The ocean of wisdom arising from the vow (the sense of nature-arising) — 「諸佛如來一切智海亦復如是,皆從如來往昔大願之所生起。」 tr. “so too is the ocean of all-knowing wisdom of all the buddhas and tathāgatas: it all arises from the great vows that the Tathāgata made in ages past.” 〔T10n0279 0273c24〕〔T10n0279 0273c〕 Fazang writes the name of this portion’s section outright as 「明性起境界」 tr. “making clear the realm of nature-arising” 〔T35n1733 0412a04〕; Chengguan explains it as 「智從昔願,緣起故來即無來」 tr. “wisdom comes from the vow of long ago, and because it arises from conditions its coming is a coming that is no coming” 〔T35n1735 0881a15〕 — the manifesting of the fruit-virtue is not newly made but is the arising of an old vow, and this is the bone of the whole Chapter on the Appearance of the Tathāgata.

(4) The realm that is the bounds and the realm that is the object — Chengguan opens two senses: 「正顯分齊之境,兼辨所緣之境」 tr. “it directly displays the realm that is the bounds, and along with it sets forth the realm that is the object” 〔T35n1735 0880c08〕; Fazang opens the same two senses: 「境界有二義,上來十種約所緣明境;此下約分齊明境,即以如來智慧大海為分齊境。」 tr. “the realm has two senses: the ten above make the realm clear with respect to the object; from here on the realm is made clear with respect to the bounds, that is, the great ocean of the Tathāgata’s wisdom is taken as the realm that is the bounds.” 〔T35n1733 0412b03〕 — that the one name ‘realm’ contains the two tracks, the object and the bounds, is the key to reading this portion without confusion.

(5) The scriptural ground for the pore’s containing all — the repeated verses, 「量等法界入毛孔」 tr. “a body whose measure equals the Dharma realm, and yet able to enter a single pore” 〔T10n0279 0274b12〕〔T10n0279 0274b〕, and the sixty-fascicle text, 「一切諸法界,皆入一毛道」 tr. “all the Dharma realms alike enter one hair’s path” 〔T09n0278 0626a06〕 — the later Huayan house speaks of the Dharma realm layer within layer by such teachings as ‘the gate of the unobstructed mastery of the broad and the narrow’, and one of the scriptural grounds within the chapter is just this verse 〔recorded without adjudication〕.


VI. Divergent Interpretations of the Commentators (the ancient worthies · with their houses named)

Chengguan, Huayan jing shu T35n1735 (following the text of the eighty-fascicle Avataṃsaka · the principal commentary)

The outline of the ten clauses of the object:

「後正顯所緣,文有十句:一通舉所化。二化時。三化處。四化法。五所化人。六七八三皆明所證,於中真如語其體,常一味故,云無差別。法界生法所依,故云無礙實際。是窮事至實,故云無邊。九化處分齊。後一遍通。」 tr. “Afterwards the object is directly displayed, and the text has ten clauses: first, raising in general those who are transformed. Second, the time of transforming. Third, the place of transforming. Fourth, the dharma of transforming. Fifth, the persons transformed. The sixth, seventh, and eighth, these three, all make clear what is realized; among these, suchness names its substance, and because it is constantly of one taste it is called without difference. The Dharma realm is that upon which beings and dharmas depend, and therefore it is called unobstructed; the true limit is the exhausting of affairs to their reality, and therefore it is called without bound. Ninth, the bounds of the place of transforming. The last one runs through all universally.” 〔T35n1735 0880c17〕

The threefold gathering and judging (the two truths · the three truths · the five realms):

「若約二諦境,前五為俗、次三為真,九通真俗,事空理空俱是空故。後一雙非,顯前九境即同無故。若約三諦,空即是真,三真為中道。若以五界攝之,初三是世界無量,四即調伏及調伏加行界,五即眾生,次三即法界,餘二雙非。」 tr. “If it be taken with respect to the realms of the two truths, the first five are conventional, the next three are real, and the ninth runs through both the real and the conventional, since the emptiness of affairs and the emptiness of principle are alike emptiness. The last is a double negation, displaying that the nine realms before are the same as not being. If it be taken with respect to the three truths, emptiness is itself the real, and the three reals are the middle way. If they be gathered by the five realms, the first three are the measurelessness of worlds; the fourth is the realm of the disciplined and of the preparatory practice of disciplining; the fifth is sentient beings; the next three are the Dharma realm; the remaining two are the double negation.” 〔T35n1735 0880c22〕

Displaying the measurelessness of the bounds:

「先約十境以顯分齊,境智相稱故皆無量;後約無境顯其非有,乃至真如皆不可得故。是以諸境雲興而常寂也。」 tr. “First, with respect to the ten realms, the bounds are displayed, and because realm and wisdom answer to each other both are measureless; afterwards, with respect to no-realm, he displays that it is not existent, even to this, that suchness itself cannot be got at. And therefore the realms rise like clouds and are yet constantly still.” 〔T35n1735 0880c28〕

Fazang, Tanxuan ji T35n1733 (the commentary on the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka, the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata)

The five senses in which the ten realms are explained:

「前中有五義:一約二諦境,初五約俗量智境、後五約真理智境。言非境界境界者,非是識所變境故云也。二約三性境,初五依他性、次四圓成實、後一遍計所執。三約五海境,初一眾生海;次二及第九世界海;次二是根欲性海;次三是法界海;後一是佛海,謂佛智是非境故。四約前〈明難品〉,佛境十種相攝可知。」 tr. “Within the former there are five senses. First, with respect to the realms of the two truths: the first five are with respect to the realm of the wisdom that measures the conventional, the latter five with respect to the realm of the wisdom of the real principle. As for saying ‘the realm that is not a realm’, it is because it is not a realm transformed by consciousness that it speaks so. Second, with respect to the realms of the three natures: the first five are the other-dependent nature, the next four the perfectly accomplished, the last one what is wholly imagined and grasped. Third, with respect to the realms of the five oceans: the first one is the ocean of sentient beings; the next two and the ninth are the ocean of worlds; the next two are the ocean of faculties, inclinations, and natures; the next three are the ocean of the Dharma realm; the last one is the ocean of buddhas, that is, because the Buddha’s wisdom is no realm. Fourth, with respect to the earlier Chapter on the Clarification of Difficulties, the mutual gathering of the ten kinds of the Buddha’s realm may be understood.” 〔T35n1733 0412a10〕

The ten clauses in the explanation of the text:

「五釋文中,初一是所化;二是化所依時,三世劫等;三所化處;四化所用法;五化所成行;六法界體不壞;七法界用無礙;八體用俱實。」 tr. “Fifth, in the explanation of the text: the first is those who are transformed; the second is the time upon which the transforming depends, the kalpas of the three times and the rest; the third, the place of those transformed; the fourth, the dharma used in transforming; the fifth, the practice accomplished by transforming; the sixth, the substance of the Dharma realm is not destroyed; the seventh, the function of the Dharma realm is unobstructed; the eighth, substance and function are both real.” 〔T35n1733 0412a17〕

A further explanation by the three greatnesses:

「又釋:此三,初真如體大;次相大,具恒沙功德名法界,迭不相妨名無礙;後體相無二名實際。又釋:此三如次,即三無性真如。九虛空是事無為境。」 tr. “A further explanation: of these three, the first is suchness, the greatness of substance; the next is the greatness of characteristic, and because it is furnished with merits as many as the sands of the Ganges it is named the Dharma realm, and because they do not obstruct one another in turn it is named unobstructed; the last, that substance and characteristic are not two, is named the true limit. A further explanation: these three in their order are the suchness of the three non-natures. The ninth, empty space, is the realm of the unconditioned that is an affair.” 〔T35n1733 0412a20〕

Li Tongxuan, Xin Huayan jing lun T36n1739

No section belonging specifically to this portion is seen (Li Tongxuan sets up four gates for this chapter and outlines two long sections 〔T36n1739 0938a07/0939a22–26〕; on the sense of the realm he has only the single sentence 「眾生境界是如來境界」 tr. “the realm of sentient beings is the realm of the Tathāgata” 〔0940b23〕 gathering it up, with no section proper to it) — 〔not found〕.

Chengguan, Yanyi chao T36n1736

Within this range no independently titled section-opening is seen — 〔not found〕.

Recorded without adjudication: as to the gathering of the ten realms, Chengguan gathers them by three schemes, the two truths, the three truths, and the five realms, while Fazang gathers them by the two truths, the three natures, the five oceans, the ten aspects of the Chapter on the Clarification of Difficulties, and the five senses in the explanation of the text; the two houses differ in how they gather and divide the ten clauses (Chengguan has 「前五為俗、次三為真」 tr. “the first five are conventional, the next three are real”, with the ninth running through both the real and the conventional and the last a double negation; Fazang has 「初五約俗量智境、後五約真理智境」 tr. “the first five are with respect to the realm of the wisdom that measures the conventional, the latter five with respect to the realm of the wisdom of the real principle”); Fazang sets out besides one track of the three natures (the first five other-dependent · the next four perfectly accomplished · the last one wholly imagined), which Chengguan does not give. As to the reckoning of the number of the verses, Chengguan, following the eighty-fascicle text, makes five verses, and Fazang, following the sixty-fascicle text, makes ten. Which of the track of the three natures and the track of the two truths is the correct explanation, and how the number of verses in the two texts is to be gathered or divided — there were divergent explanations among the ancients; they are recorded here, and no judgment is made.


VII. Cross-Reading and Lineage

  • The sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka, the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata 〔T09n0278 0625a14–0626a15 前〕: the complete parallel translation of this portion, wholly the same in the structure of its scene (the ten realms · the dragon’s rain · the ocean arising from the vow · the number of the rivers of the four continents · the eighty koṭis of dragon kings doubling the rain · the four measureless things · the conclusion · the repeated verses); for the collation clause by clause see heading four.
  • The Huayan house’s sense of nature-arising: upon the sixty-fascicle text Fazang marks this portion’s section outright as 「性起境界」 tr. “the realm of nature-arising” 〔T35n1733 0412a04〕; that the ocean of wisdom arises from the great vows of long ago, and that realm and wisdom being not two is named no realm — the scriptural ground of the gate of nature-arising lies here. 〔recorded without adjudication〕
  • The Dasheng qixin lun, the Awakening of Faith, T32n1666: examined for 「如來智海」 tr. “the Tathāgata’s ocean of wisdom” and 「性起」 tr. “nature-arising”, zero hits — 〔not found〕.
  • Fazang’s Huayan yisheng jiaoyi fenqi zhang T45n1866: no independent citation of this portion’s 「如來境界」 tr. “the realm of the Tathāgata” is seen (the clauses it cites from the Chapter on Nature-Arising belong to the class of ‘the ten minds expounded in the Chapter on Nature-Arising’, and do not attach to this portion) — 〔not found〕.
  • The treatises of the lineage (the Cheng weishi lun T31n1585 · the She dacheng lun T31n1594 · the Yuqie shidi lun T30n1579): examined for 「如來智海」 tr. “the Tathāgata’s ocean of wisdom” and ‘the dragon king raining upon the ocean’, zero hits — 〔not found〕. This portion has no direct quoted text of a lineage along the consciousness-only axis; the lack is recorded in accordance with fact, and nothing from elsewhere is used to fill it.

VIII. Edition Location Register

  • Śikṣānanda T279 (the base text): chapter thirty-seven, the Chapter on the Appearance of the Tathāgata, the fifth portion, the realm of the appearance, 〔T10n0279 0273c06〕 onward, ending just before 〔0274b17〕 (the seventh assembly, the return to the palace of Universal Light). The order of the passages: the raising of the question and the listing of the ten realms 〔0273c〕 · the extension to measurelessness 〔0273c〕 · the realm of the mind 〔0273c〕 · the simile of the dragon’s rain 〔0273c〕 · the simile of the ocean arising from the dragon’s mind 〔0273c〕 · the setting out of the heading with the bidding to listen, and the number of the rivers of the four continents 〔0273c–0274a〕 · the dragon kings’ doubling of the rain and the water pouring from the palaces 〔0274a〕 · the tides not missing their time, and the four measureless things 〔0274a〕 · the ocean not reaching the ocean of wisdom 〔0274a〕 · the joining of the dharma to the four measureless things, and the general conclusion 〔0274a–0274b〕 · the five repeated verses 〔0274b〕. 〔Recorded · the granularity of the sources〕 For this portion the eighty-fascicle text is given sources at the level of the line, clause by clause; where a unique location could not be established, the source is marked at the level of the column.
  • Buddhabhadra T278 (the Jin translation, the principal witness collated): the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata, the thirty-second, part three, 〔T09n0278 0625a14〕 onward, ending just before 〔0626a15〕. The ten realms 0625a15 · reaching every place and reaching nothing 0625a22 · the realm of the mind 0625a24 · the simile of the dragon’s rain 0625a26 · the ocean from the dragon’s vow 0625a29 · the bidding to listen 0625b02 · the number of the rivers of the four continents 0625b04 (the total 0625b08) · the rain-water of the dragon kings 0625b10 · the water of the deep pools 0625b21 · the tides not missing their time, and the four measureless things 0625c08 · the ocean not reaching the ocean of wisdom 0625c13 · the joining of the dharma to the four measureless things 0625c15 · the conclusion 0625c20 · the beginning of the repeated verses 0625c23 (the first verse 0625c24 · the verse on the hair-track 0626a06).
  • Chengguan, Shu, T35n1735: the fifth, making clear the realm of the appearance, 0880c08 onward, ending just before 0881b03. The reason for its coming, in two senses, 0880c08 · the prose in three parts 0880c13 · the wisdom able to know 0880c16 · the ten clauses of the object 0880c17 · the threefold gathering and judging 0880c22 · the displaying of the measurelessness of the bounds 0880c28 · the direct making clear of the realm of the mind 0881a03 · the explanation of without bondage and without release 0881a05 · the question and its explanation 0881a06 · the general judgment of the three similes 0881a10 · the explanation of the first two similes 0881a12 · the outline of the simile of the vastness and depth of the ocean’s water 0881a15 · the three sections within the simile 0881a18 · the aspect of the tide 0881a21 · the joining of the dharma 0881a23 · the general displaying of measurelessness 0881a25 · the general conclusion 0881a27 · the five verses 0881a29. The Chao T36n1736: an independent section-opening within this range 〔not found〕.
  • Fazang, Tanxuan ji, T35n1733: the fifth, making clear the realm of nature-arising, 0412a04 onward, ending just before 0412b17. The name of the section and the three parts 0412a04 · what is able to know 0412a07 · the five senses of the ten realms 0412a10 · the ten clauses in the explanation of the text 0412a17 · the further explanation by the three greatnesses 0412a20 · realm and wisdom not two 0412a23 · the three parts displaying breadth with respect to wisdom 0412a26 · measurelessness following upon mind 0412a29 · the two senses of realm 0412b03 · the three similes 0412b05 · the joining of the dharma in the four measureless things 0412b11 · the general conclusion and the outline of the verses 0412b15.
  • Li Tongxuan, Lun, T36n1739: a section proper to this portion 〔not found〕.
  • Variant readings: within the range of T279 covered by this unit, 〔0273c06〕–〔0274b16〕, the Taishō base text carries 6 collation notes, recorded one by one without adjudication (base reading 【大】|variant readings of other witnesses, several witnesses separated by /): 〔0274a07〕霔【大】*|澍【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】*(*同校並繫〔0274a14〕〔0274b09〕之霔字) · 〔0274a13〕震【大】|覆【聖】 · 〔0274a19〕出【大】|山【宋】 · 〔0274a19〕入【大】|八【聖】 · 〔0274a24〕諭【大】*|喻【宋】【元】【明】【宮】*(*同校並繫〔0277a15〕〔0277b21〕〔0277b23〕之諭字) · 〔0274a24〕如來【大】|如是【聖】. (* = a Taishō asterisked collation: the same note also governs the remaining occurrences of that graph in the text; for notes of this class the T279 XML supplies no corresp for the recurrences, so the asterisk alone is shown and no second anchor is created.) The interlinear notes (phonetic and collation glosses) were stripped and recorded at the level of the original-text layer.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing. The full statement of AI's role across the 指月 project is maintained at methodology.

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0