華嚴經 品三十七 如來出現品 · 轉法輪Avataṃsaka Sūtra · The Appearance of the Tathāgata · The Turning of the Wheel of the Dharma

〔T10 0275c14〕
心要Essence

輪一直在轉,卻沒有人推。

普賢自己先問:佛轉法輪這件事該怎麼知道。他一連說了九句,句句先說怎麼轉,再說因為知道什麼——而第一句就把動作抽掉了:「以心自在力無起無轉而轉法輪」澄觀替這句補了一個註腳:正說法的時候,心裡不起一個念頭說『我把法傳給對面這個人』。

然後他設了兩個譬喻。一個說文字:窮盡未來劫也說不完,法輪也一樣沒有休息。一個說書字:它進得了一切事、一切話、一切算數,卻不留在任何一處。

最教人意外的是,他說法輪的出生處不在佛那一邊——「隨一切眾生心行欲樂無量差別」而出音聲。眾生有多少差別,法輪就有多少面孔。

於是有了那句最寬的話:「言音實相即法輪故。」你今天聽見的每一句話,都不在輪外。

The wheel has been turning all along, and no one is pushing it.

Samantabhadra puts the question to himself first: how this matter of the Buddha’s turning the wheel of the Dharma is to be known. He then says nine clauses in a row, each of them saying first how it is turned and then because of knowing what — and the very first clause takes the act away: “by the power of the mind’s mastery, with nothing arisen and nothing turned, he turns the wheel of the Dharma.” Chengguan supplies a footnote to that clause: at the very time of speaking the Dharma, not one thought stirs in the mind that says ‘I am handing the Dharma to the person across from me’.

Then he sets up two similes. One is of letters: though one spoke to the exhaustion of the kalpas of the future it could not be told to the end, and the wheel of the Dharma likewise has no rest. One is of the written graph: it can get into every affair, every utterance, every reckoning, and yet stays in none of them.

What is most unexpected is his saying that the place where the wheel of the Dharma is born is not on the Buddha’s side — sounds are issued “following the measureless differences in the workings of the minds of all sentient beings and in what they desire and delight in.” However many differences there are among sentient beings, the wheel of the Dharma has that many faces.

And so comes the widest sentence of all: “because the true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma.” Every sentence you hear today is not outside the wheel.

原典Canonical · verbatim

〔T10 0275〕 「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺轉法輪?佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應如是知如來以心自在力無起無轉而轉法輪,知一切法恒無起故;以三種轉斷所應斷而轉法輪,知一切法離邊見故;離欲際、非際而轉法輪,入一切法虛空際故;無有言說而轉法輪,知一切法不可說故;究竟寂滅而轉法輪,知一切法涅槃性故;以一切文字、一切言語而轉法輪,如來音聲無處不至故;知聲如響而轉法輪,了於諸法真實性故;於一音中出一切音而轉法輪,畢竟無主故;無遺無盡而轉法輪,內外無著故。佛子!譬如一切文字語言,盡未來劫說不可盡;佛轉法輪亦復如是,一切文字安立顯示,無有休息,無有窮盡。佛子!如來法輪悉入一切語言文字而無所住。譬如書字,普入一切事、一切語、一切算數、一 〔T10 0276〕 切世間出世間處而無所住;如來音聲亦復如是,普入一切處、一切眾生、一切法、一切業、一切報中而無所住。一切眾生種種語言,皆悉不離如來法輪。何以故?言音實相即法輪故。佛子!菩薩摩訶薩於如來轉法輪應如是知 「復次,佛子!菩薩摩訶薩欲知如來所轉法輪,應知如來法輪所出生處。何等為如來法輪所出生處?佛子!如來隨一切眾生心行欲樂無量差別,出若干音聲而轉法輪。佛子!如來、應、正等覺有三昧,名:究竟無礙無畏,入此三昧已,於成正覺一一身、一一口,各出一切眾生數等言音,一一音中眾音具足,各各差別而轉法輪,令一切眾生皆生歡喜。能如是知轉法輪者,當知此人則為隨順一切佛法;不如是知,則非隨順。佛子!諸菩薩摩訶薩應如是知佛轉法輪,普入無量眾生界故。」 爾時,普賢菩薩摩訶薩欲重明此義而說頌言:   「如來法輪無所轉,三世無起亦無得,
  譬如文字無盡時,十力法輪亦如是。
  如字普入而無至,正覺法輪亦復然,
  入諸言音無所入,能令眾生悉歡喜。
  佛有三昧名究竟,入此定已乃說法,
  一切眾生無有邊,普出其音令悟解。
  一一音中復更演,無量言音各差別,
  於世自在無分別,隨其欲樂普使聞。
  文字不從內外出,亦不失壞無積聚,
  而為眾生轉法輪,如是自在甚奇特。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

徵問標舉:菩薩應該怎樣知道如來轉法輪

〔普賢菩薩摩訶薩對如來性起妙德菩薩等大眾說〕

「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應該怎樣知道如來、應、正等覺轉法輪呢?

九句明體用:轉而無轉,而輪不曾停

「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應當這樣知道——

「如來以心得自在的力量,沒有生起、沒有動轉而轉法輪,因為他知道一切法本來恆常沒有生起的緣故;

「以三種轉〔示相、勸修、作證這三度轉說〕斷除所應當斷除的,而轉法輪,因為他知道一切法離開常見與斷見這兩邊的緣故;

「離開有欲的邊際、也離開邊際而轉法輪,因為他契入一切法如同虛空那樣的邊際的緣故;

「沒有言說而轉法輪,因為他知道一切法不可言說的緣故;

「徹底寂滅而轉法輪,因為他知道一切法本自是涅槃之性的緣故;

「以一切文字、一切言語而轉法輪,因為如來的音聲沒有一處到不了的緣故;

「知道音聲就像空谷的回響一樣而轉法輪,因為他明瞭諸法的真實體性的緣故;

「在一個音聲之中出生一切音聲而轉法輪,因為那音聲畢竟沒有一個作主的東西的緣故;

「沒有遺漏、沒有窮盡地轉法輪,因為他對內對外都無所執著的緣故。

文字無盡喻:說到未來劫盡也說不完

「佛子!譬如一切文字語言,窮盡未來的劫數去說也說不完;佛轉法輪也是這樣,用一切文字安立顯示,沒有休息的時候,也沒有窮盡的時候。

遍入無住喻:如來的法輪進入一切語言文字而不停留

「佛子!如來的法輪,全部進入一切語言文字之中,而不停留在任何一處。

「譬如書寫的字,普遍地進入一切事、一切話語、一切算數、一切世間與出世間的處所,卻不停留在其中任何一處;如來的音聲也是這樣,普遍地進入一切處所、一切眾生、一切法、一切業、一切果報之中,而不停留在其中任何一處。

分齊句:眾生的話語,沒有一句在法輪之外

「一切眾生種種的語言,全都不離開如來的法輪。為什麼呢?因為言語音聲的真實相就是法輪的緣故。

結勸:對如來轉法輪,應當這樣知道

「佛子!菩薩摩訶薩對於如來轉法輪,應當這樣知道。

顯所因:還要知道法輪從哪裡出生

「再者,佛子!菩薩摩訶薩想要知道如來所轉的法輪,應當知道如來的法輪所出生的地方。什麼是如來法輪所出生的地方呢?

隨機出音:眾生的心有多少差別,音聲就有多少差別

「佛子!如來隨著一切眾生心的行相與欲求愛樂有無量的差別,發出種種不同的音聲而轉法輪。

三昧出音:一一音中,眾音具足

「佛子!如來、應、正等覺有一種三昧,名叫『究竟無礙無畏』,進入這個三昧之後,在他成正覺的一一身、一一口之中,各各發出與一切眾生數目相等的言音,而每一個音聲之中又眾音具足,各各差別而轉法輪,使一切眾生都生起歡喜。

得失結勸:這樣知道的人,才是隨順佛法的人

「能夠這樣知道轉法輪的人,應當知道這個人就是隨順一切佛法的人;不這樣知道,就不是隨順。

總結:普入無量眾生界

「佛子!諸菩薩摩訶薩應當這樣知道佛轉法輪,因為它普遍進入無量的眾生界的緣故。」

重頌:五頌重明此義

那時,普賢菩薩摩訶薩想要重新闡明這個義理,而說偈頌道:

「如來的法輪沒有所轉的東西,三世之中既沒有生起也沒有可得;就像文字永遠沒有說盡的時候,具十力者的法輪也是這樣。(頌法輪體用與文字無盡)

「就像字普遍地進入一切而其實沒有到達哪裡,正覺者的法輪也是如此;進入種種言語音聲而其實沒有進入什麼,卻能使眾生全都歡喜。(頌遍入無住)

「佛有一種三昧名叫究竟,進入這個定之後才說法;一切眾生沒有邊際,佛就普遍地發出音聲使他們開悟理解。(頌三昧出生)

「一一音聲之中又更演說,無量的言語音聲各各差別;他對世間自在而沒有分別,隨著眾生的欲求愛樂普遍地使他們聽聞。(頌一音出眾音)

「文字不是從裡面出來的,也不是從外面出來的,不會失壞,也沒有積聚;而為了眾生轉動法輪,這樣的自在真是極為奇特。(頌文字無來處而輪自在)」


The Question Raised: How a Bodhisattva Should Know the Tathāgata’s Turning of the Wheel of the Dharma

〔Samantabhadra, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, speaks to the great assembly, to the bodhisattva Wondrous Virtue of the Tathāgata’s Nature-Arising and the rest〕

“Sons of the Buddha! How should the bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the turning of the wheel of the Dharma by the Tathāgata, the Arhat, the Perfectly Awakened One?

The Nine Clauses That Make Clear Substance and Function: Turning and Yet No Turning, and the Wheel Has Never Stopped

“Sons of the Buddha! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know it in this way —

“The Tathāgata, by the power of the mind’s attained mastery, turns the wheel of the Dharma with nothing arisen and nothing turned, because he knows that all dharmas are from the first and constantly unarisen;

“by the three turnings 〔the three rounds of exposition: demonstrating the characteristics, exhorting to cultivation, and bearing witness〕 he cuts off what ought to be cut off, and so turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are apart from the two extremes, the view of permanence and the view of annihilation;

“apart from the limit where there is desire, and apart from limit as such, he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he enters into that limit of all dharmas which is like space;

“with no speech at all he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas cannot be spoken;

“in utter quiescence he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are of themselves the nature of nirvāṇa;

“by every letter and by every kind of speech he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because there is no place the Tathāgata’s voice does not reach;

“knowing that sound is like an echo in an empty valley, he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he understands clearly the true substance and nature of dharmas;

“within a single sound he brings forth all sounds and turns the wheel of the Dharma, because that sound is ultimately without anything that acts as its master;

“without omission and without exhaustion he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because toward what is within and what is without alike he has no attachment.

The Simile of the Inexhaustibility of Letters: Though One Spoke Till the Kalpas of the Future Were Spent, It Could Not Be Told to the End

“Sons of the Buddha! It is like all letters and speech: though one spoke to the exhaustion of the kalpas of the future, they could not be told to the end; the Buddha’s turning of the wheel of the Dharma is like this too — with all letters he sets it up and reveals it, and there is no time of rest and no time of exhaustion.

The Simile of Universal Entry Without Abiding: The Tathāgata’s Wheel of the Dharma Enters All Speech and Letters and Does Not Stay There

“Sons of the Buddha! The Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma enters entirely into all speech and letters, and yet does not stay in any one place.

“It is like a written graph, which enters universally into every affair, every utterance, every reckoning, and every place both worldly and world-transcending, and yet does not stay in any one of them; the Tathāgata’s voice is like this too — it enters universally into every place, every sentient being, every dharma, every deed, and every recompense, and yet does not stay in any one of them.

The Clause of Bounds: Of the Speech of Sentient Beings, Not One Utterance Lies Outside the Wheel of the Dharma

“All the various kinds of speech of all sentient beings are none of them apart from the Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma. Why is this? Because the true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma.

The Concluding Exhortation: Of the Tathāgata’s Turning of the Wheel of the Dharma, One Should Know in This Way

“Sons of the Buddha! Of the Tathāgata’s turning of the wheel of the Dharma, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know in this way.

Revealing Whence It Comes: One Should Further Know Where the Wheel of the Dharma Is Born

“Again, Sons of the Buddha! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva who wishes to know the wheel of the Dharma that the Tathāgata turns should know the place where the Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma is born. What is the place where the Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma is born?

Sounds Issued According to Capacity: However Many the Differences in the Minds of Sentient Beings, So Many the Differences in the Sounds

“Sons of the Buddha! The Tathāgata, following the measureless differences in the workings of the minds of all sentient beings and in what they desire and delight in, issues sundry different sounds and turns the wheel of the Dharma.

Sounds Issued from Samādhi: Within Each Single Sound, All Sounds Are Complete

“Sons of the Buddha! The Tathāgata, the Arhat, the Perfectly Awakened One, has a samādhi named ‘Ultimate Unobstructedness and Fearlessness’; and having entered this samādhi, from each single body and each single mouth in which he accomplishes right awakening he issues words and sounds equal in number to all sentient beings, and within each single sound all sounds are complete, each of them different, and so he turns the wheel of the Dharma, causing all sentient beings to give rise to joy.

The Concluding Exhortation on Gain and Loss: Only One Who Knows in This Way Is One Who Accords With the Buddha’s Dharma

“One who is able to know the turning of the wheel of the Dharma in this way — know that this person is one who accords with all the Buddha’s Dharma; one who does not know in this way does not accord.

The General Conclusion: It Enters Universally into the Measureless Realms of Sentient Beings

“Sons of the Buddha! The bodhisattva-mahāsattvas should know the Buddha’s turning of the wheel of the Dharma in this way, because it enters universally into the measureless realms of sentient beings.”

The Verses in Repetition: Five Verses Restating This Sense

At that time Samantabhadra, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, wishing to restate this sense, spoke in verse:

“The Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma has nothing that is turned; in the three times there is neither arising nor anything got; just as letters have no time when they are told to the end, so too is the wheel of the Dharma of him of the ten powers. (This verse praises the substance and function of the wheel of the Dharma and the inexhaustibility of letters)

“Just as a graph enters universally into all things and yet in fact arrives nowhere, so too is the wheel of the Dharma of the rightly awakened one; it enters into the sundry kinds of speech and sound and yet in fact enters into nothing at all, and yet it can make sentient beings rejoice one and all. (This verse praises the universal entry without abiding)

“A buddha has a samādhi named Ultimate; having entered this concentration he then speaks the Dharma; sentient beings have no bound, and the Buddha universally issues sounds that cause them to awaken and understand. (This verse praises the giving birth of sounds from samādhi)

“Within each single sound there is further expounding, and measureless speech and sounds are each of them different; toward the world he is sovereign and without discrimination, and following what sentient beings desire and delight in he causes them universally to hear. (This verse praises the issuing of all sounds from a single sound)

“Letters do not come out from within, nor do they come out from without; they are not destroyed, and they have no accumulation; and yet for the sake of sentient beings he turns the wheel of the Dharma — such mastery is exceedingly marvelous. (This verse praises that letters have no place they come from, and yet the wheel turns in mastery)”

義疏Exposition

為什麼證道之後,接著就要問轉法輪

前一義講如來成正覺——那是果德之證;這一義忽然轉問轉法輪——那是果德之施。次第是澄觀點破的,他釋此義的來意只用了八個字:「得大菩提,理必轉授。」法藏的說法一樣:「第八明性起轉法輪,謂前得菩提,次轉法輪,以為次第。」

普賢的問法仍舊是本品一貫的句式:「菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺轉法輪?」他不問『佛轉的是什麼法輪』,而問『菩薩應該怎樣知道』。這一字之差要留意:法輪本身是果地事,可知的路數卻能指給你。

有人會以為,佛既然成道了,說法自然就是後續的一樁事,沒什麼可深究。這正是本義要排的第一個誤解。經文接下來的九句,句句都在說一件出乎意料的事——佛轉法輪的時候,並沒有一個『我在轉、他在受』的動作發生;而正因為沒有,那個輪才轉得無窮無盡。證與授不是兩截,是同一件事的裡與外。

九句的排法:前五說體,後四說用

長行答文由九個句子構成,每一句都是同一個格式——先說『怎樣轉』,再說『因為知道什麼』。澄觀把這個結構點得很清楚:「文有九句,減數十也,皆先標、後釋。前五顯體性寂寥,後四辨相用深廣。」華嚴慣以十為圓數,此處減一作九,前五說輪的體性寂靜,後四說輪的相用深廣。

前五句還有名目。澄觀配之為五門:「一能轉心、二所轉體、三所得果、四能詮教、五所顯理。」——能轉的心、所轉的體、所得的果、能詮的教、所顯的理。他接著下了本義最要緊的一句判語:「夫轉法輪不過此五,今皆即事契真。」轉法輪這件事,古來諸教所說不出這五樣,名數是一樣的;華嚴此處的不同,在於五樣當下都即事而契真。

要排的誤解是:這不是說華嚴另立了一套新的法輪。名數與諸教相同,讀者若只數名目,會覺得沒什麼新鮮。澄觀在《隨疏演義鈔》裡把這一點說死了:「揀實異權,名數則同,意旨懸隔。」名相相同而旨趣懸隔——所以底下五句要一句一句地看它怎麼「即事契真」。

第一句:轉的時候,心裡沒有『我在轉』

「以心自在力無起無轉而轉法輪,知一切法恒無起故」——先問一句:說法明明是一件有動作的事,怎麼會「無起無轉」?

澄觀的釋文答得極實在:「一能轉心者,由知法無起故,正轉法時不起心念,言我轉授前人,名心自在,如是方為真能轉也。」關鍵在「不起心念,言我轉授前人」——正在說法的當下,心裡不曾動一個『我把法傳給對面這個人』的念頭。所以「無起無轉」不是說沒有說法這回事,是說沒有那個能所對立的心。

排一個誤解:這不是叫人說法時放空、什麼都不想。心自在的所以然在下半句——「知一切法恒無起故」。因為徹見一切法本來就沒有生起過,所以也就沒有一個法可以從我這裡搬到你那裡。落到讀者處:凡是還帶著『我在教你』的說法,都還在轉授的相裡;真能轉的人,是那個連轉都轉不出一個所轉之物的人。

第二句:三種轉,斷所應斷

「以三種轉斷所應斷而轉法輪,知一切法離邊見故」三種轉是什麼?澄觀說:「二所轉體者,即示勸證,名為三轉。此三名輪者,摧障惱故。」示、勸、證——示相轉是指示給你看,勸修轉是勸你去修,作證轉是自證以取信。三度轉說,叫做三轉。至於為什麼叫「輪」,是因為它能摧壞障惱。

《隨疏演義鈔》把第一轉說得很具體:「第一示相轉者,諸佛世尊正證諸法,隨何等器而指示之。如轉四諦,言此身是苦、業惑為集、此滅為滅、能滅為道。」

難處在「知一切法離邊見故」這一句。既然要斷所應斷,那不就有惑可斷嗎?澄觀正面接住這一問:「言離邊者,若有惑可摧,未離於常;無惑可摧,寧免於斷?」——若真有一個惑在那裡等著被摧,那惑就是常住的;若說根本無惑可摧,那又落入斷滅。兩頭都不能站。所以他說:「今永離斷常等邊,方為真能斷所應斷」真正的斷惑,是連『有惑被斷』這個見都不立的斷。

第三句:得的那個果,連「離」也遣掉

「離欲際、非際而轉法輪,入一切法虛空際故」欲際是有欲的邊際,非際是邊際——兩個邊際都離。

澄觀釋此為所得果:「三所得果者,由斷惑故,得離欲際;由證性空,本無可離,斯際亦遣。」讀法是兩步:先因為斷了惑,所以得到「離欲」這個果;再因為證了性空,發現本來就沒有什麼可離,於是連「離欲際」這個界標也一併遣掉。

排一個誤解:這不是說修行沒有果。果是真得了的,只是得到之後回頭看,那個被離的東西從來不曾實有。落地處在此——很多人修到有一點離欲的受用,就把那個受用立成一個地標,牢牢守住;本義告訴你,守住地標的人,其實還沒走到那個地標所指的地方。虛空際者,無際可指,方是真際。

第四句:終日說法,而未曾說一字

「無有言說而轉法輪,知一切法不可說故」既說法輪,何以無有言說?

澄觀釋為能詮之教:「四能詮教者,理假言詮,今了本寂,滅不可說故,則終日言而未曾言也。」道理要靠言語來詮表,這是不得已;然而所詮的那個理本自寂滅,寂滅是說不出的,於是整日在說而未曾說著一字。

排一個誤解:這不是主張沉默勝於說法,也不是說言教可廢。經文明明白白說「而轉法輪」——輪照轉、法照說。要辨的是說者對言語的態度:知道言語詮不到那個理,所以說而不執言;不知道的人,把言語當成理本身,愈說離得愈遠。讀者聽法時亦當如是自檢——你記住的是那些話,還是那些話所指的地方。

第五句:法輪本來就是清淨的

「究竟寂滅而轉法輪,知一切法涅槃性故」這一句在說所顯之理。

澄觀的釋文有一個轉折:「五所顯理,謂即寂滅。今了性淨涅槃,法本不然,今則無滅,方為究竟之滅。」——所謂寂滅,不是把燒著的火滅掉;因為法本來就不曾燃起,所以今日也就無所謂滅,這個『無滅之滅』才叫究竟寂滅。他隨即下一句總斷:「是知其輪本來常清淨也。」

法藏在六十本的疏裡也有同樣的眼目,他釋六十本「皆悉清淨」一句時說這是梵輪、是性淨,並引經句「其輪本來常清淨」為證。

這是本義最深的一層:輪不是轉起來以後才清淨的,是本來清淨的東西在轉。落到讀者處——所謂修行使人清淨,其實是使人認出本來的清淨;把清淨當成修出來的新東西,就又落回『本不然而今滅』的那個框子裡去了。

第六句:一切文字言語,都是法輪

前五句說體,說到這裡轉入相用。「以一切文字、一切言語而轉法輪,如來音聲無處不至故」

澄觀判後四句云:「後四相用深廣中,一觸言皆輪廣也」第一句說的是廣——碰到哪一種言語,哪一種言語就是輪。法藏在六十本的釋文裡把這個『所以然』點出:如來音聲於一切世間文字語言無所不至,所以都在轉法輪。

要排的誤解是把它讀成『佛會說很多種語言』。經文的意思比這遠得多:不是佛精通諸語,是諸語無一不被法輪所遍。這一句與後面的分齊句是同一根線——本義最後會說到,連眾生自己的話語,也不在法輪之外。

第七句:音聲如響,所以深

「知聲如響而轉法輪,了於諸法真實性故」空谷回響有聲可聞,卻找不到一個發聲的實體在谷中。佛說法的音聲亦復如是。

澄觀判此句為深:「二即用而寂深也。」——正在起用的當下就是寂靜,所以叫深。法藏在六十本的釋文中亦作同判:「二中先標甚深,實性故者釋成深義。」為什麼如響就深?因為「了於諸法真實性」——見到諸法的真實體性,才知道音聲的有,是無自性的有。

排一個誤解:如響不等於虛假。回響是真的傳到你耳朵裡了,只是它沒有一個獨立的發聲者。佛的音聲也是這樣:你確實聽見了、確實得益了,而那音聲並不從一個實有的『說者』中發出。這一句解掉的執,是把說法者當成一個實體去崇拜或去追隨。

第八句:一音之中出一切音,畢竟無主

「於一音中出一切音而轉法輪,畢竟無主故」一個音怎麼出得了一切音?

澄觀判此為亦深亦廣,釋云「三一即多而無主」——一就是多,而其中沒有一個作主的。法藏在六十本的疏裡把理由說得最透:「以各從緣成,無自體故,同為一性,悉是法輪。」每一個音都是從緣而成,都沒有自體;沒有自體,所以同是一性;同是一性,所以一音中出一切音並無妨礙。

排一個誤解:這不是說佛的喉嚨特別能發聲。「無主」二字是關鍵——若音有主,一就只能是一;正因為畢竟無主,一與多之間才沒有那道牆。華嚴一即一切之談,在此有一個很樸素的經據:不是變出許多,是本來就沒有那個把一與多隔開的東西。

第九句:橫則無遺,竪則無盡

「無遺無盡而轉法輪,內外無著故。」澄觀釋此句最見筆力:「四即橫竪而恒虛,謂橫則無遺,無所不轉故。竪則無盡,窮未來故。而不著內外,則深廣無涯矣。」

橫說是空間——沒有一處遺漏,所以叫無遺;竪說是時間——窮盡未來際,所以叫無盡。而支撐這橫竪二無的,是末句「內外無著」:不執著內、也不執著外,於是深廣沒有涯際。法藏於六十本亦作二分:無流故深、無盡故廣。

落到讀者處:無遺無盡不是一個誇張的形容詞,它是有理由的——正因為無所著,才沒有邊界;一有所著,就有了邊界。這也回應了第一句:無起無轉的心,才轉得出無遺無盡的輪。九句至此收束,體與用扣成一環。

文字無盡喻:說到未來劫盡也說不完

法說完了,接著設喻。「譬如一切文字語言,盡未來劫說不可盡;佛轉法輪亦復如是,一切文字安立顯示,無有休息,無有窮盡。」

澄觀指出這一喻的所對:「一文字無盡喻,喻第九無盡」——它專喻前面第九句的無遺無盡。法藏在六十本判為第三無盡門,說法一樣:先文字無盡喻,後合法輪無盡。

這一喻的巧處在於取材極近。文字語言是人人天天在用的東西,你若真去數,一輩子也數不完它的組合。佛轉法輪的無盡,不必到別處去想像——就是這樣一種你已經身在其中卻從未細看的無盡。而經文加了四個字:「無有休息」。無盡是量,無休是相;法輪不是偶爾轉一次,是從未停下。

遍入無住喻:進得去,而不留在裡面

第二喻換了一個眼目。經文先立法:「如來法輪悉入一切語言文字而無所住。」再設喻:「譬如書字,普入一切事、一切語、一切算數、一切世間出世間處而無所住」再合:如來音聲普入一切處、一切眾生、一切法、一切業、一切報中而無所住。

澄觀判此為「二遍入無住喻,喻六七八用而常寂故」——它喻的是第六、七、八三句,正在起用而恆常寂靜。法藏在六十本判為第四無住門,說得更細:其中有法、喻、合三段,字母無住喻所喻的是入緣無住之德;所入之處先有一個總說,再別舉五處。

喻依很好懂:書寫的字母進入一切事、一切話、一切算數,你不能說某個字就住在算數裡、住在世間裡。它進得去,卻不留在裡面。

要排的誤解是把「無所住」讀成『沒有真的進去』。經文的「普入」是實說——如來音聲確實進入一切業、一切報之中。無住說的不是深淺,是有沒有黏著。這一喻對讀者最實的一著:真正能遍及一切處的東西,一定是不佔位置的東西;凡佔一個位置的,就只能在那個位置上。

合中的那一句:入的不只是言語

澄觀在喻合處還點出一層開合。他說合中有二段,先合普入一切,並解釋為什麼要多此一合:「以上法中但云入一切言故,今明入餘法則觸類皆法輪」——前面的法說只講到入一切言語,這裡的合則說連法、業、報都入了;既然如此,觸類所及,無一不是法輪。他隨後設一問:「豈同三乘但用佛聲為輪等耶?」

這一問是本義的分水嶺,也是諸家異釋所在,此處只誌其問,不作取捨〔諸家異說並錄於〈承衍〉〕。

另外澄觀還誌了一筆體例:「前五易故,略不喻之。」——前五句說體,義理明白,所以不為它們設喻。設喻只為後四句。讀者由此可知,本義的兩個喻不是泛泛的裝點,而是有所專對的。

言音實相即法輪

長行至此下了一句極重的話:「一切眾生種種語言,皆悉不離如來法輪。何以故?言音實相即法輪故。」

先問:眾生的話有粗有妄,有讚有罵,怎麼會不離法輪?經文的答語只有七個字——言音實相即法輪。所繫的不是言音的內容,是言音的實相。任何一句話,不論說的是什麼,它作為言音的那個真實相是同一個;而那個實相,就是法輪。

排兩個誤解。其一,這不是說隨便說什麼都是說法,也不是說內容無關緊要——經文說的是實相,不是內容。其二,這也不是把法輪稀釋成一個空泛的比喻;正相反,它是把法輪的分齊擴到最寬處:法輪不以說者為界。

落到讀者處,這一句給了一個很切身的門:你不必等到聽見佛的聲音才算聽見法。你此刻聽見的任何一句話,若能於其上見到言音的實相,法輪就在那裡轉。這也正是第六句「以一切文字、一切言語而轉法輪」的收處。

法輪從哪裡出生

長行前段說『怎麼轉』,後段轉問『從哪裡出生』。經文自設問答:「菩薩摩訶薩欲知如來所轉法輪,應知如來法輪所出生處。何等為如來法輪所出生處?」

答案出人意料——出生處不在佛那一邊,在眾生這一邊:「如來隨一切眾生心行欲樂無量差別,出若干音聲而轉法輪。」

澄觀把這個道理說得極硬:「先辨輪所起因,因機差故。若離物機,佛無說故。」——法輪之所以起,是因為眾生的根機有差別;若離開眾生的機,佛根本沒有說的內容。他又說:「物既為力不同,教須適宜差別。」

排一個誤解:這不是說佛的法要看人臉色。是說法本無定量,量在受者。所以同一個法輪,在此人聽來是這一句,在彼人聽來是那一句,並非佛改了口,是機不同。落地處在此——讀者若覺得某段經文對自己說不上話,未必是經有問題,可能只是那一段所應的機此刻不在你身上;而總有一段是應你的。

究竟無礙無畏三昧

出生處還有一個更深的所依。經文說:「如來、應、正等覺有三昧,名:究竟無礙無畏,入此三昧已,於成正覺一一身、一一口,各出一切眾生數等言音,一一音中眾音具足,各各差別而轉法輪,令一切眾生皆生歡喜。」

三昧的名字要一字一字看。法藏在六十本的疏裡逐字釋之:「無礙者,是辯才也。無畏者,言無怯懼。」無礙是辯才無礙,無畏是心中無所怯懼。而「究竟」二字,澄觀特別點出其分齊:「說法所依之定名者,無礙辯才無所怯畏。得究竟者,唯佛有故。」——無礙與無畏並非佛所獨有,究竟的無礙無畏才是佛所獨有。

法藏還說明了為什麼說法要以三昧為所依:「謂欲轉法輪入此三昧者,是所依門故也。」至於為什麼一一音中眾音具足能令眾生歡喜,他答得樸實:「稱根授法故令喜也。」——所授的法正對他的根,所以他歡喜。

留意「於成正覺一一身、一一口」一語,它逕承前一義的成正覺——轉法輪不是成道之後另起的一樁事,是成正覺那個身那個口當下的事。

隨順與不隨順

長行以一個判語收束:「能如是知轉法輪者,當知此人則為隨順一切佛法;不如是知,則非隨順。」再結一句:「諸菩薩摩訶薩應如是知佛轉法輪,普入無量眾生界故。」

法藏在六十本判此為知益門,釋云:「明如上而知順大菩提,不爾即非。」如上而知者,順於大菩提;不如上而知者,即不順。

這句話的分量常被讀輕。它不是勸勉語,是判定語——判的是「知」的方式,不是「信」的有無。一個人可以極恭敬地相信佛在說法,卻始終把它想成一個大人物在對眾人講話;照本義看,那樣的知就不隨順。隨順的知是什麼?就是前面九句所說的——知其無起無轉、知其如響無主、知其遍入無住、知其出生於眾生之機。

而經文給的理由是最後那一句:「普入無量眾生界故。」法輪之所以要這樣知,是因為它本來就是普入眾生界的東西;照著它的實情去知,才叫隨順。

重頌五頌

長行說完,普賢以五頌重明。澄觀科之云:「偈有五頌」,又云「初二偈頌法輪體用」。

首頌起句便是全義之骨:「如來法輪無所轉,三世無起亦無得」長行的九句在此收成一句——無所轉。而「三世無起亦無得」比長行更進一步:長行說「知一切法恒無起」,頌則連「得」也一併掃去;不但沒有所轉之法,也沒有所得之果。接著「譬如文字無盡時,十力法輪亦如是」對位文字無盡喻。

次頌對位遍入無住喻,第三頌對位三昧出生,第四頌對位一音出眾音——皆隨長行,不出新義。

末頌則值得留意:「文字不從內外出,亦不失壞無積聚,而為眾生轉法輪,如是自在甚奇特。」長行的書字喻只說遍入無住,頌則補上「不從內外出」與「不失壞無積聚」二義——不從內外出者,無來處;不失壞無積聚者,不因用而減、不因不用而存。文字尚且如此,何況法輪。而「甚奇特」三字是全品少見的讚歎語:奇特的不是佛能說多少法,是『無所轉而轉』這件事本身。

承衍

本義為華嚴宗性起義之經據所在。法藏於六十本逕以「性起轉法輪」標科,並開七門分別——體相、深廣、無盡、無住、分齊、出生、知益——與澄觀於八十本所立『顯體用·顯所因』二分而下開九句〔前五顯體、後四顯用〕,開合不同。二家所依之本本異:六十本別出「一切願」「皆悉清淨」二目,法藏之十義正依此二目立「法輪所依」與『梵輪性淨』;八十本則作九句標釋之對,澄觀因之立五門。九句與十義孰為正科,古有異說,誌錄之,不判。

分齊一義,二家之言亦異。法藏於六十本立分齊門,並列三判:小乘唯以五音為法輪聲,餘如問阿難天雨等皆非法輪所攝;三乘則佛之一切音聲皆是法輪,餘則皆非;一乘則一切眾生言音亦入法輪,約用皆得成法輪。澄觀於八十本則不立此門,而於喻合處設問云「豈同三乘但用佛聲為輪等耶」。二家之判,誌錄之,不判。

頌數之判亦繫於本異:澄觀依八十本作五頌,並判初二頌法輪體用;法藏依六十本作十偈,判為初一頌體相門、次一頌無盡門、次二頌半頌無住門、次三頌半頌出生門、末後二頌却頌深廣門。二本頌數本異,二疏各依所疏之本,全錄不判。

異譯之異別誌於考據:六十本「一切音聲不離法輪音聲故」即八十本「言音實相即法輪故」,一就音聲相攝立、一就實相立;六十本「隨順一切佛家」即八十本「隨順一切佛法」,一就種姓說、一就法說;六十本「一切音聲皆是一聲」與八十本「於一音中出一切音」,能所之向相反。照實錄,不強解。

至於《大乘起信論》《華嚴一乘教義分齊章》以及成唯識、攝論、瑜伽諸論,於本義之專屬牒句皆零命中——本義無他軸承衍之直接文據;唯澄觀於《隨疏演義鈔》中引《瑜伽》五相以攝今經五句,是古德所引之橋,非本義自有之承衍。據實標闕,不以他處之文充之。

Why, After the Realizing of the Way, the Very Next Question Is the Turning of the Wheel of the Dharma

The sense before this one spoke of the Tathāgata’s accomplishing of right awakening — that was the realizing of the virtue of the fruit; this sense turns all at once to ask about the turning of the wheel of the Dharma — that is the bestowing of the virtue of the fruit. The order is one that Chengguan lays bare: in explaining the reason for the coming of this sense he uses only eight graphs, “having gained the great awakening, in principle he must of necessity turn it over and transmit it.” Fazang says the same: “Eighth, making clear the turning of the wheel of the Dharma as nature-arising: that is, before, he gained awakening, and next he turns the wheel of the Dharma — such is the order.”

Samantabhadra’s way of asking still keeps the sentence-form that runs through this whole chapter: “How should the bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the turning of the wheel of the Dharma by the Tathāgata, the Arhat, the Perfectly Awakened One?” He does not ask ‘what wheel of the Dharma does the Buddha turn’, but ‘how should a bodhisattva know it’. That difference of a single word is worth marking: the wheel of the Dharma is itself a matter of the ground of the fruit, but the way of knowing it can be pointed out to you.

Someone will suppose that since the Buddha has realized the Way, his speaking the Dharma naturally follows as one more item of business, and there is nothing much to look into. This is exactly the first misunderstanding this sense clears away. The nine clauses that follow in the scripture are, one and all, saying something unexpected: at the time the Buddha turns the wheel of the Dharma there is no such act as ‘I am turning it and he is receiving it’; and just because there is not, that wheel turns without end and without exhaustion. Realizing and bestowing are not two segments; they are the inside and the outside of one and the same thing.

How the Nine Clauses Are Laid Out: The First Five Speak of Substance, the Latter Four of Function

The prose of the answer is made of nine sentences, and every one of them has the same format — first ‘how it is turned’, and then ‘because he knows what’. Chengguan lays this structure out very plainly: “The text has nine clauses, one short of the number ten; each first sets up and afterward explains. The first five reveal that the substance and nature are still and vacant; the latter four discern that the characteristic and function are profound and vast.” The Huayan is accustomed to take ten as the round number; here one is subtracted to make nine, the first five speaking of the stillness of the wheel’s substance and nature, the latter four of the profundity and vastness of its characteristic and function.

The first five clauses have names as well. Chengguan matches them to five gates: “first, the mind that turns; second, the substance that is turned; third, the fruit that is gained; fourth, the teaching that expresses; fifth, the principle that is revealed.” — the mind that does the turning, the substance that is turned, the fruit that is gained, the teaching that expresses, the principle that is revealed. He then lets fall the single most important judgement in this sense: “Now, the turning of the wheel of the Dharma goes no further than these five; here all of them tally with the real in the very midst of the phenomenal.” As for this matter of turning the wheel of the Dharma, what the teachings of old have said goes no further than these five items; the names and the numbers are the same. What is different here in the Huayan is that all five of them, just as they stand, tally with the real in the very midst of the phenomenal.

The misunderstanding to be cleared away is this: it is not being said that the Huayan has set up a new sort of wheel of the Dharma. The names and numbers are the same as in the other teachings, and a reader who only counts the items will feel there is nothing fresh here. Chengguan, in the Yanyi chao, settles the point once for all: “It sorts out the real as differing from the provisional: the names and numbers are the same, but the intent lies far apart.” The names and marks are the same while the point aimed at lies far apart — and so the five clauses below must be watched one by one to see how each of them ‘tallies with the real in the very midst of the phenomenal’.

The First Clause: At the Time of the Turning, There Is No ‘I Am Turning’ in the Mind

“By the power of the mind’s mastery, with nothing arisen and nothing turned, he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are constantly unarisen” — first a question: speaking the Dharma is plainly a matter with an act in it; how can it be “with nothing arisen and nothing turned”?

Chengguan’s explanation answers as concretely as could be wished: “First, the mind that turns: because he knows that dharmas do not arise, at the very time of turning the Dharma he does not raise the thought that says ‘I am turning it over and transmitting it to the person before me’; this is named the mind’s mastery, and only thus is it truly a turning.” The pivot lies in “does not raise the thought that says ‘I am turning it over and transmitting it to the person before me’” — in the very moment of speaking the Dharma, the thought ‘I am handing the Dharma over to the person across from me’ has never once stirred in the mind. So “nothing arisen and nothing turned” does not say that there is no such thing as speaking the Dharma; it says that there is no mind in which a doer stands over against a receiver.

Clear away one misunderstanding: this is not telling a person to empty out and think of nothing while speaking the Dharma. The ground of the mind’s mastery is in the second half of the clause — “because he knows that all dharmas are constantly unarisen”. Because he sees through to the fact that no dharma has ever arisen at all, there is likewise no dharma that could be carried from me over to you. Brought down to where the reader stands: any speaking of the Dharma that still carries ‘I am teaching you’ is still inside the characteristic of turning-and-transmitting; the one who can truly turn is the one who cannot turn out so much as one thing turned.

The Second Clause: The Three Turnings, Cutting Off What Ought to Be Cut Off

“By the three turnings he cuts off what ought to be cut off and turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are apart from extreme views” — what are the three turnings? Chengguan says: “Second, the substance that is turned: that is, demonstrating, exhorting, and witnessing, which are named the three turnings. That these three are named a wheel is because they crush obstruction and vexation.” Demonstrating, exhorting, witnessing — the turning that demonstrates the characteristics points them out for you to see, the turning that exhorts to cultivation urges you to cultivate, and the turning that bears witness testifies from one’s own realization so as to win trust. Three rounds of exposition: these are called the three turnings. As for why they are called a “wheel”, it is because they can crush obstruction and vexation.

The Yanyi chao states the first turning very concretely: “As for the first, the turning that demonstrates the characteristics: the buddhas, the world-honored ones, having rightly realized all dharmas, point them out according to what sort of vessel one is. As when they turn the four truths, saying, this body is suffering, deeds and afflictions are its arising, this cessation is cessation, and what is able to bring cessation is the path.”

The hard place is the clause “because he knows that all dharmas are apart from extreme views”. If what ought to be cut off is to be cut off, then surely there is an affliction that can be cut off? Chengguan takes the question head-on: “As for the words ‘apart from the extremes’: if there were an affliction that could be crushed, one would not yet be apart from permanence; and if there were no affliction that could be crushed, how would one escape annihilation?” — if there really were an affliction sitting there waiting to be crushed, that affliction would be something permanently abiding; and if it were said that there is no affliction at all to be crushed, one falls into annihilation. Neither end will bear standing on. And so he says: “Now, being forever apart from the extremes of annihilation and permanence and the rest, only then is it truly a cutting off of what ought to be cut off” — the true cutting off of affliction is a cutting off that does not so much as set up the view that ‘there is an affliction being cut off’.

The Third Clause: The Fruit That Is Gained — Even the ‘Being Free From’ Is Dispelled

“Apart from the limit of desire and apart from limit as such he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he enters that limit of all dharmas which is like space” — the limit of desire is the limit where there is desire, and ‘limit as such’ is limit itself; both limits are left behind.

Chengguan explains this as the fruit that is gained: “Third, the fruit that is gained: because he cuts off affliction, he gains the limit that is freedom from desire; and because he realizes that the nature is empty, there was from the first nothing to be free from, and so this limit too is dispelled.” The way to read it is in two steps: first, because affliction has been cut off, the fruit called ‘freedom from desire’ is gained; and then, because emptiness of nature has been realized, one finds that there was never anything to be free from, and with that even the boundary-marker ‘the limit of freedom from desire’ is dispelled along with the rest.

Clear away one misunderstanding: this is not saying that cultivation has no fruit. The fruit is truly gained; only that, looking back once it has been gained, the thing one was freed from was never real. Here is where it comes to earth — many a person who has cultivated to the point of some slight enjoyment of freedom from desire sets that enjoyment up as a landmark and holds fast to it; this sense tells you that whoever holds fast to the landmark has in fact not yet arrived at the place the landmark points to. As for the limit that is like space, there is no limit there to point at, and only that is the true limit.

The Fourth Clause: Speaking the Whole Day Long, and Never Having Spoken a Single Graph

“With no speech at all he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas cannot be spoken” — since it is called a wheel of the Dharma, how can there be no speech?

Chengguan explains it as the teaching that expresses: “Fourth, the teaching that expresses: principle borrows words to be expressed; but now that he understands that it is from the first still, and that the quiescent cannot be spoken, then he speaks the whole day long and has never spoken.” Principle must lean on speech in order to be set forth, and this cannot be helped; yet the principle so set forth is of itself quiescent, and the quiescent cannot be uttered — and so he is speaking all day long and has never spoken a single graph.

Clear away one misunderstanding: this is not urging that silence is better than speaking the Dharma, nor that verbal teaching may be discarded. The scripture says plainly “and turns the wheel of the Dharma” — the wheel turns as ever, the Dharma is spoken as ever. What is to be discerned is the speaker’s bearing toward words: knowing that words cannot express that principle, he speaks and does not grasp at words; the one who does not know takes words to be the principle itself, and the more he speaks the further he goes. The reader hearing the Dharma should examine himself in the same way — is what you have kept those words, or the place those words point to?

The Fifth Clause: The Wheel of the Dharma Was Pure from the First

“In utter quiescence he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are of the nature of nirvāṇa” — this clause speaks of the principle that is revealed.

Chengguan’s explanation makes a turn in it: “Fifth, the principle that is revealed, namely quiescence itself. Now, understanding the nirvāṇa that is pure by nature, dharmas were from the first not aflame, and so now there is no extinguishing; and only this is the utter extinguishing.” — what is called quiescence is not the putting out of a fire that is burning; because dharmas were never aflame from the first, there is today nothing that could be called an extinguishing, and this ‘extinguishing that is no extinguishing’ is what is called utter quiescence. He at once lets fall a general judgement: “From this one knows that this wheel is from the first constantly pure.”

Fazang, in his commentary on the sixty-fascicle text, has the same eye: in explaining the sixty’s clause “all of them pure” he says that this is the Brahmā wheel and is pure by nature, and cites the scriptural line “this wheel is from the first constantly pure” in witness.

This is the deepest layer in this sense: the wheel is not something that becomes pure once it has begun to turn; it is a thing pure from the first that turns. Brought down to where the reader stands — what is called cultivation making a person pure is in fact cultivation making a person recognize the purity that was there from the first; to take purity as some new thing produced by cultivation is to fall back into the frame of ‘what was never aflame is now put out’.

The Sixth Clause: All Letters and Speech Are the Wheel of the Dharma

The first five clauses speak of substance; at this point the text turns into characteristic and function. “By every letter and every kind of speech he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because there is no place the Tathāgata’s voice does not reach.”

Chengguan judges the latter four clauses thus: “Among the latter four, whose characteristic and function are profound and vast: the first, that whatever speech one touches upon is the wheel, is the vast.” The first of them speaks of the vast — whatever kind of speech one comes upon, that kind of speech is the wheel. Fazang, in his explanation of the sixty-fascicle text, brings out the ground of it: the Tathāgata’s voice reaches everywhere among all the letters and speech of the world, and therefore all of them are turning the wheel of the Dharma.

The misunderstanding to be cleared away is the reading that ‘the Buddha can speak a great many languages’. What the scripture means goes much further than that: it is not that the Buddha is master of many tongues, but that not one tongue is left unpervaded by the wheel of the Dharma. This clause and the clause of bounds further on are one and the same thread — this sense will say at the end that even the speech of sentient beings themselves is not outside the wheel of the Dharma.

The Seventh Clause: Sound Is Like an Echo, and Therefore It Is Profound

“Knowing that sound is like an echo he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he understands the true nature of dharmas” — an echo in an empty valley can be heard, and yet no sounding substance can be found in the valley. The sound of the Buddha’s speaking of the Dharma is just so.

Chengguan judges this clause to be the profound: “the second is that in the very midst of function it is still — this is the profound.” — in the very moment of arising into function it is still, and therefore it is called profound. Fazang, in his explanation of the sixty-fascicle text, judges likewise: “In the second, he first sets up ‘exceedingly profound’, and the words ‘because of the real nature’ explain and establish the sense of the profound.” Why should being like an echo be profound? Because of “he understands the true nature of dharmas” — only when one has seen the true substance and nature of dharmas does one know that the being of sound is a being without own-nature.

Clear away one misunderstanding: being like an echo does not amount to being false. The echo really did carry to your ear; only that it has no independent sounder. The Buddha’s voice is likewise: you did indeed hear it and did indeed profit by it, and yet that voice does not issue from a really existing “speaker”. The grasping that this clause undoes is the taking of the speaker of the Dharma to be a substance, to be worshipped or followed as such.

The Eighth Clause: Within a Single Sound All Sounds Come Forth, Ultimately Without a Master

“Within a single sound he brings forth all sounds and turns the wheel of the Dharma, because it is ultimately without a master” — how can one sound bring forth all sounds?

Chengguan judges this to be both profound and vast, explaining it as “the third is that the one is the many and yet without a master” — the one is the many, and within it there is nothing that plays the master. Fazang, in his commentary on the sixty-fascicle text, states the reason most transparently: “Since each is formed from conditions and has no substance of its own, they are alike of one nature, and all of them are the wheel of the Dharma.” Every single sound is formed from conditions and has no substance of its own; having no substance of its own, they are alike of one nature; being alike of one nature, there is no hindrance in all sounds coming forth within a single sound.

Clear away one misunderstanding: this is not saying that the Buddha’s throat is uncommonly able to make sounds. The two graphs “without a master” are the pivot — if sound had a master, then one could only ever be one; it is just because it is ultimately without a master that there is no wall between one and many. The Huayan talk of one being all has here a very plain scriptural ground: it is not that many are conjured forth, but that there was never anything there to hold one and many apart.

The Ninth Clause: Crosswise It Is Without Omission, Upright It Is Without Exhaustion

“Without omission and without exhaustion he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he has no attachment within or without.” Chengguan’s explanation of this clause shows his hand at its best: “The fourth is that in the very midst of the crosswise and the upright it is ever void: crosswise it is without omission, since there is nothing it does not turn; upright it is without exhaustion, since it goes to the end of the future. And as he is attached neither within nor without, the profound and the vast are without shore.”

Spoken crosswise, it is space — there is not one place omitted, and therefore it is called without omission; spoken upright, it is time — it goes to the very end of the future, and therefore it is called without exhaustion. And what holds up these two ‘withouts’, the crosswise and the upright, is the last clause, “no attachment within or without”: attached neither to the inner nor to the outer, and so the profound and the vast have no shore. Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, likewise makes a division of two: without outflow, therefore profound; without exhaustion, therefore vast.

Brought down to where the reader stands: “without omission and without exhaustion” is not an extravagant adjective; it has its reason — it is just because there is no attachment that there is no boundary, and the moment there is attachment there is a boundary. This answers back to the first clause as well: only a mind with nothing arisen and nothing turned can turn a wheel without omission and without exhaustion. With this the nine clauses are gathered up, and substance and function close into one ring.

The Simile of the Inexhaustibility of Letters: Though One Spoke Till the Kalpas of the Future Were Spent, It Could Not Be Told to the End

The Dharma having been stated, a simile is next set up. “It is like all letters and speech: though one spoke to the exhaustion of the kalpas of the future, they could not be told to the end; the Buddha’s turning of the wheel of the Dharma is like this too — with all letters he sets it up and reveals it, and there is no rest and no exhaustion.”

Chengguan points out what this simile answers to: “first, the simile of the inexhaustibility of letters, which is a simile for the inexhaustibility of the ninth clause” — it is a simile specifically for the ‘without omission and without exhaustion’ of the ninth clause above. Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, judges it the third gate, the gate of inexhaustibility, and says the same: first the simile of the inexhaustibility of letters, then the matching of it to the inexhaustibility of the wheel of the Dharma.

The deftness of this simile lies in how near at hand its material is. Letters and speech are what everyone uses every day; if you really set out to count them, a whole lifetime would not exhaust their combinations. The inexhaustibility of the Buddha’s turning of the wheel of the Dharma need not be imagined off in some other place — it is just such an inexhaustibility as this, one you are already inside of and have never looked at closely. And the scripture adds four graphs: “there is no rest”. Inexhaustibility is a matter of quantity; restlessness is a matter of the characteristic; the wheel of the Dharma is not turned now and again — it has never stopped.

The Simile of Universal Entry Without Abiding: It Gets In, and Does Not Stay Inside

The second simile shifts to another eye. The scripture first states the Dharma: “The Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma enters entirely into all speech and letters and yet does not abide anywhere.” Then it sets up the simile: “It is like a written graph, which enters universally into every affair, every utterance, every reckoning, and every place both worldly and world-transcending, and yet does not abide anywhere.” Then it matches them: the Tathāgata’s voice enters universally into every place, every sentient being, every dharma, every deed, and every recompense, and yet abides nowhere.

Chengguan judges this to be “second, the simile of universal entry without abiding, which is a simile for the sixth, seventh, and eighth, since they are in function and yet constantly still” — what it likens is the sixth, seventh, and eighth clauses, arising into function and yet constantly still. Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, judges it the fourth gate, the gate of non-abiding, and states it in more detail: within it there are three passages, the Dharma stated, the simile, and the matching; what the simile of the non-abiding of the letters of the alphabet likens is the virtue of entering conditions without abiding; and among the places entered there is first a general statement, and then a separate raising of five places.

What the simile rests on is easy enough to grasp: the written letters of the alphabet enter every affair, every utterance, every reckoning, and you cannot say that a given letter abides in reckoning, or abides in the world. It gets in, and does not stay inside.

The misunderstanding to be cleared away is the reading of “does not abide anywhere” as ‘it did not really get in’. The scripture’s “enters universally” is said in earnest — the Tathāgata’s voice does indeed enter into every deed and every recompense. Non-abiding speaks not of how deep it goes but of whether it sticks. The most practical stroke of this simile for the reader is this: whatever can truly reach everywhere must be a thing that takes up no place; whatever occupies one place can only be at that place.

The Sentence Within the Matching: What It Enters Is Not Speech Alone

At the matching of the simile Chengguan points out one further layer of opening and folding. He says that within the matching there are two passages, first the matching of the universal entry into all, and he explains why this further matching is needed: “Since above, in the statement of the Dharma, it said only that it enters into all speech, here it is made clear that it enters into the remaining dharmas as well, so that whatever kind one comes upon is the wheel of the Dharma” — the statement of the Dharma above spoke only of entering all speech, while the matching here says that it enters dharmas, deeds, and recompenses too; and this being so, whatever kind one comes upon, not one of them is not the wheel of the Dharma. He then sets a question: “How should this be the same as the three vehicles, which use only the Buddha’s voice as the wheel and so forth?”

This question is the watershed of this sense, and it is also where the divergent interpretations of the commentators lie; here only the question is recorded, and no choice is made between them 〔the divergent accounts of the commentators are recorded together under ‘Lineage’〕.

Chengguan also records one point of form: “Because the first five are easy, they are passed over and no simile is given for them.” — the first five clauses speak of substance, and their sense is plain, and so no simile is set up for them. Similes are set up only for the latter four clauses. From this the reader may know that the two similes of this sense are not general ornament, but each has something it answers to.

The True Character of Speech-Sound Is Itself the Wheel of the Dharma

At this point the prose lets fall an exceedingly weighty sentence: “All the various kinds of speech of all sentient beings are none of them apart from the Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma. Why is this? Because the true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma.”

First the question: the speech of sentient beings can be coarse and false, praising and cursing; how should it not be apart from the wheel of the Dharma? The scripture’s answer runs to seven graphs only — the true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma. What it hangs upon is not the content of the speech-sound but the true character of the speech-sound. Whatever the sentence, whatever it says, the true character it has as speech-sound is one and the same; and that true character is the wheel of the Dharma.

Two misunderstandings are to be cleared away. First, this is not saying that whatever one says at random is the speaking of the Dharma, nor that content does not matter — what the scripture speaks of is the true character, not the content. Second, neither is it a diluting of the wheel of the Dharma into a vague figure of speech; on the contrary, it widens the bounds of the wheel of the Dharma to their widest: the wheel of the Dharma is not bounded by who is speaking.

Brought down to where the reader stands, this sentence gives a very close-at-hand gate: you need not wait until you hear the Buddha’s voice for it to count as hearing the Dharma. Of any sentence you hear at this moment, if upon it you can see the true character of speech-sound, then the wheel of the Dharma is turning right there. And this is just where the sixth clause, “by every letter and every kind of speech he turns the wheel of the Dharma”, comes home.

Where the Wheel of the Dharma Is Born

The earlier part of the prose spoke of ‘how it turns’; the latter part turns to ask ‘where it is born’. The scripture sets its own question and answer: “The bodhisattva-mahāsattva who wishes to know the wheel of the Dharma that the Tathāgata turns should know the place where the Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma is born. What is the place where the Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma is born?”

The answer is unexpected — the place where it is born is not on the Buddha’s side but on the side of sentient beings: “The Tathāgata, following the measureless differences in the workings of the minds of all sentient beings and in what they desire and delight in, issues sundry sounds and turns the wheel of the Dharma.”

Chengguan states this principle in the hardest terms: “first, discerning the cause from which the wheel arises, since the cause is the difference of capacities. For if one were apart from the capacities of beings, the Buddha would have nothing to say.” — the wheel of the Dharma arises because the faculties and capacities of sentient beings differ; apart from the capacities of beings, the Buddha would have nothing at all to say. And again he says: “Since beings differ in the force that shapes them, the teaching must be fitted to them and differ accordingly.”

Clear away one misunderstanding: this is not saying that the Buddha’s Dharma must watch people’s faces. It is saying that the Dharma has of itself no fixed measure; the measure is in the receiver. And so one and the same wheel of the Dharma is heard by this person as this sentence and by that person as that sentence — not that the Buddha has changed his words, but that the capacities differ. Here is where it comes to earth: if a reader feels that some passage of scripture has nothing to say to him, it is not necessarily the scripture that is at fault; it may only be that the capacity that passage answers to is not upon him at this moment — and there will always be a passage that answers to him.

The Samādhi of Ultimate Unobstructedness and Fearlessness

The place where it is born has a still deeper thing on which it depends. The scripture says: “The Tathāgata, the Arhat, the Perfectly Awakened One, has a samādhi named: Ultimate Unobstructedness and Fearlessness; and having entered this samādhi, from each single body and each single mouth in which he accomplishes right awakening he issues words and sounds equal in number to all sentient beings, and within each single sound all sounds are complete, each of them different, and so he turns the wheel of the Dharma, causing all sentient beings to give rise to joy.”

The name of the samādhi must be read graph by graph. Fazang, in his commentary on the sixty-fascicle text, explains it word for word: “‘Unobstructed’ is eloquence. ‘Fearless’ means without timidity or dread.” Unobstructed is eloquence unobstructed; fearless is to have nothing timid or dreading in the mind. And as for the word “ultimate”, Chengguan points out its bounds especially: “As for the name of the concentration on which the speaking of the Dharma depends: eloquence unobstructed, and nothing timid or feared. That it is gained ultimately is because only a buddha has it.” — unobstructedness and fearlessness are not the Buddha’s alone; ultimate unobstructedness and fearlessness are what is the Buddha’s alone.

Fazang also makes clear why the speaking of the Dharma must take a samādhi as that on which it depends: “That is, his entering this samādhi when he would turn the wheel of the Dharma is because it is the gate on which it depends.” And as for why all sounds being complete within each single sound can cause sentient beings to rejoice, he answers plainly: “because the Dharma is bestowed to match their faculties, they are made to rejoice.” — the Dharma bestowed answers exactly to his faculties, and so he rejoices.

Mark the words “from each single body and each single mouth in which he accomplishes right awakening”: they take up directly the accomplishing of right awakening of the sense before — the turning of the wheel of the Dharma is not a further piece of business begun after the realizing of the Way; it is the immediate matter of that very body and that very mouth in which right awakening is accomplished.

According and Not According

The prose gathers up with a sentence of judgement: “One who is able to know the turning of the wheel of the Dharma in this way — know that this person is one who accords with all the Buddha’s Dharma; one who does not know in this way does not accord.” And it concludes with one more sentence: “The bodhisattva-mahāsattvas should know the Buddha’s turning of the wheel of the Dharma in this way, because it enters universally into the measureless realms of sentient beings.”

Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, judges this to be the gate of the benefit of knowing, explaining: “It makes clear that to know as above is to accord with the great awakening, and that not to do so is not to accord.” One who knows as above accords with the great awakening; one who does not know as above does not accord.

The weight of this sentence is often read too lightly. It is not a word of encouragement but a word of judgement — and what it judges is the manner of the knowing, not the presence or absence of faith. A person may believe with the utmost reverence that the Buddha is speaking the Dharma and yet think of it throughout as a great personage addressing a crowd; on this sense’s showing, that sort of knowing does not accord. What, then, is the knowing that accords? It is just what the nine clauses said — knowing it as having nothing arisen and nothing turned, knowing it as like an echo and without a master, knowing it as entering universally without abiding, knowing it as born from the capacities of sentient beings.

And the reason the scripture gives is that last sentence: “because it enters universally into the measureless realms of sentient beings.” The wheel of the Dharma is to be known in this way because it is of itself a thing that enters universally into the realms of sentient beings; to know it according to how it actually is — that is what is called according.

The Five Verses in Repetition

The prose finished, Samantabhadra restates it in five verses. Chengguan outlines them: “the verses are five”, and again, “the first two verses praise the substance and function of the wheel of the Dharma”.

The opening line of the first verse is the very bone of this whole sense: “The Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma has nothing that is turned; in the three times there is neither arising nor anything got.” The nine clauses of the prose are here gathered into one sentence — nothing is turned. And “in the three times there is neither arising nor anything got” goes one step beyond the prose: the prose said “he knows that all dharmas are constantly unarisen”, while the verse sweeps away the “got” along with it; not only is there no dharma that is turned, there is also no fruit that is gained. Then “just as letters have no time when they are told to the end, so too is the wheel of the Dharma of him of the ten powers” is matched to the simile of the inexhaustibility of letters.

The second verse is matched to the simile of universal entry without abiding, the third to the giving birth from samādhi, the fourth to the coming forth of all sounds from a single sound — all of them following the prose, and bringing forth no new sense.

The last verse is worth marking: “Letters come out neither from within nor from without; they are not destroyed and have no accumulation; and yet for the sake of sentient beings he turns the wheel of the Dharma — such mastery is exceedingly marvelous.” The simile of the written graph in the prose spoke only of universal entry without abiding, while the verse adds two further senses, “neither from within nor from without” and “not destroyed and without accumulation” — coming neither from within nor from without, they have no place they come from; not destroyed and without accumulation, they are not diminished by being used nor stored up by being unused. If letters are already so, how much more the wheel of the Dharma. And the three graphs “exceedingly marvelous” are a word of praise seldom met with in this chapter: what is marvelous is not how much Dharma the Buddha can speak, but the very matter of ‘turning with nothing turned’.

Lineage

This sense is where the scriptural ground of the Huayan school’s doctrine of nature-arising lies. Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, straightaway labels the outline “the turning of the wheel of the Dharma as nature-arising”, and opens seven gates to discern it — substance and characteristic, the profound and vast, inexhaustibility, non-abiding, bounds, giving birth, and the benefit of knowing — differing in its opening and folding from Chengguan, who on the eighty-fascicle text sets up the division of two, ‘revealing the substance and function · revealing whence it comes’, and beneath it opens nine clauses 〔the first five revealing substance, the latter four revealing function〕. The texts the two of them follow differ in themselves: the sixty separately brings out the two items “all the vows” and “all of them pure”, and it is precisely on these two items that Fazang’s ten senses establish “that on which the wheel of the Dharma depends” and ‘the Brahmā wheel and the purity of the nature’; the eighty makes pairs of setting up and explaining in nine clauses, and Chengguan accordingly sets up five gates. Which of the nine clauses and the ten senses is the proper outline — the ancients held divergent accounts; these are recorded, and not adjudicated.

On the one sense of bounds too the words of the two differ. Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, sets up the gate of bounds and lists three judgements side by side: for the lesser vehicle, only the five sounds are the sound of the wheel of the Dharma, and the rest, such as asking Ānanda whether the sky is raining, are not embraced by the wheel of the Dharma; for the three vehicles, all the Buddha’s sounds are the wheel of the Dharma and the rest are not; for the one vehicle, the speech-sounds of all sentient beings also enter the wheel of the Dharma, since with respect to function all of them can become the wheel of the Dharma. Chengguan, on the eighty-fascicle text, does not set up this gate, but at the matching of the simile sets a question: “How should this be the same as the three vehicles, which use only the Buddha’s voice as the wheel and so forth?” The judgements of the two are recorded, and not adjudicated.

The judgement of the number of verses likewise hangs on the difference of the texts: Chengguan, following the eighty-fascicle text, makes five verses, and judges the first two to praise the substance and function of the wheel of the Dharma; Fazang, following the sixty-fascicle text, makes ten verses, and judges the first one to praise the gate of substance and characteristic, the next one the gate of inexhaustibility, the next two and a half the gate of non-abiding, the next three and a half the gate of giving birth, and the last two to turn back and praise the gate of the profound and the vast. The number of verses differs in the two texts themselves, and each of the two commentaries follows the text it comments on; it is recorded in full without adjudication.

The divergences of the parallel translation are recorded separately in the apparatus: the sixty’s “because no sound at all is apart from the sound of the wheel of the Dharma” is the eighty’s “because the true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma”, the one established with respect to the mutual embracing of sounds and the other with respect to the true character; the sixty’s “accords with the whole household of the buddhas” is the eighty’s “accords with all the Buddha’s Dharma”, the one spoken with respect to the lineage and the other with respect to the Dharma; and the sixty’s “all sounds are alike a single sound” and the eighty’s “within a single sound he brings forth all sounds” have the direction of what acts and what is acted on reversed. These are recorded as they stand, without forcing an explanation.

As for the Dasheng qixin lun, the Huayan yisheng jiaoyi fenqi zhang, and the Cheng weishi lun, the She lun, and the Yuqie among the treatises, in all of them the passages taking up this sense specifically come to zero hits — this sense has no direct textual warrant of lineage on the other axes; only that Chengguan, in the Yanyi chao, cites the five aspects of the Yuqie so as to gather in the five clauses of the present scripture, and that is a bridge cited by an ancient worthy, not a lineage belonging to this sense itself. It is marked as lacking, as the facts stand, and nothing from elsewhere is put in its place.

考據Apparatus

第八義『轉法輪』=普賢答「菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺轉法輪」〔T10n0279 0275c14〕。前義成正覺既明果德之證,此義明果德之施——證而必授,故次之。長行先以九句明轉之體用〔前五顯體性、後四辨相用〕,次設文字無盡喻與書字遍入喻,結以「言音實相即法輪故」〔T10n0279 0276a04〕一句;後段別顯法輪所出生處,繫於「究竟無礙無畏」三昧,末以隨順與不隨順判知者之得失。重頌五頌對位長行。澄觀判此段體用五門「今皆即事契真」,法藏於六十本判為「性起轉法輪」而開七門,並於分齊門列小乘·三乘·一乘三判——此為本義最見宗骨亦最須誌錄不判之一處。


一、科判定位

科判系統此義之位
底本 T279 三十九品品三十七 如來出現品(第七會 重會普光明殿)·第八義 轉法輪〔T10n0279 0275c14〕起–〔0276a29〕前訖
澄觀《華嚴經疏》第八明出現轉法輪〔T35n1735 0883c04〕起–〔0884a14〕前訖;長行三=標徵·釋相·總結,釋相二=顯體用·顯所因,末辨偈頌五頌
澄觀《隨疏演義鈔》「第八出現轉大法輪」科起〔T36n1736 0629a06〕;別以釋名·出體·轉相三門總釋法輪義
法藏《探玄記》(六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品〉疏)第八明性起轉法輪〔T35n1733 0414c01〕起–〔0415a16〕前訖;長行三=標門·辨釋·結知,釋中開七門
李通玄《新華嚴經論》本義專屬起訖科段未見(查核未見獨立引句)〔查無〕

來意——澄觀繫此第八義於前第七義『成正覺』,明證與授之次第:

「得大菩提,理必轉授。」〔T35n1735 0883c04〕

法藏繫之同揆而標名作「性起轉法輪」:

「第八明性起轉法輪,謂前得菩提,次轉法輪,以為次第。長行中三,標門、辨釋、結知。」〔T35n1733 0414c01〕

長行三分(澄觀)——

「長行中三:初標徵、次釋相、後總結。就釋相中二:先顯體用、後顯所因。」〔T35n1735 0883c05〕

顯體用之內科:

「今初,分三:初法、次喻、後結勸。今初,文有九句,減數十也,皆先標、後釋。前五顯體性寂寥,後四辨相用深廣。」〔T35n1735 0883c06〕

前五之名目:

「前中,一能轉心、二所轉體、三所得果、四能詮教、五所顯理。夫轉法輪不過此五,今皆即事契真。」〔T35n1735 0883c09〕

喻段之科:

「文有二喻:一文字無盡喻,喻第九無盡;二遍入無住喻,喻六七八用而常寂故。」〔T35n1735 0883c28〕

顯所因之科:

「於中三:先辨輪所起因,因機差故。若離物機,佛無說故。」〔T35n1735 0884a07〕

偈頌——澄觀:「偈有五頌」〔T35n1735 0884a12〕;又「初二偈頌法輪體用」〔0884a13〕。

法藏七門——

「釋中有七門分別轉法輪義:一體相、二深廣、三無盡、四無住、五分齊、六出生、七知益。」〔T35n1733 0414c03〕


二、術語

漢所徵精義
轉法輪本義通篇之目〔T10n0279 0275c14〕澄觀《鈔》釋名:「法即軌持,輪者如帝王輪,從喻得名。」〔T36n1736 0629a10〕又總釋:「流演圓通名之為輪,自我之彼故名為轉。」〔T36n1736 0629a16〕
梵輪法輪之異名《鈔》:「亦名梵輪,如來大梵之所轉故。」〔T36n1736 0629a09〕;法藏亦繫之於「皆悉清淨」句:「是梵輪故、性淨故」〔T35n1733 0414c10〕
心自在力本義「以心自在力無起無轉而轉法輪」〔T10n0279 0275c15〕澄觀:「一能轉心者,由知法無起故,正轉法時不起心念,言我轉授前人,名心自在,如是方為真能轉也。」〔T35n1735 0883c11〕
三種轉本義「以三種轉斷所應斷而轉法輪」〔T10n0279 0275c17〕澄觀:「二所轉體者,即示勸證,名為三轉。此三名輪者,摧障惱故。」〔T35n1735 0883c13〕;法藏作「謂示相、勸知、引證為三也」〔T35n1733 0414c09〕
示相轉三轉之初《鈔》:「第一示相轉者,諸佛世尊正證諸法,隨何等器而指示之。如轉四諦,言此身是苦、業惑為集、此滅為滅、能滅為道。」〔T36n1736 0629b27〕
離邊見本義「知一切法離邊見故」〔T10n0279 0275c17〕澄觀:「言離邊者,若有惑可摧,未離於常;無惑可摧,寧免於斷?今永離斷常等邊,方為真能斷所應斷」〔T35n1735 0883c15〕
離欲際·非際本義「離欲際、非際而轉法輪,入一切法虛空際故」〔T10n0279 0275c18〕澄觀:「三所得果者,由斷惑故,得離欲際;由證性空,本無可離,斯際亦遣。」〔T35n1735 0883c17〕
究竟寂滅本義「究竟寂滅而轉法輪,知一切法涅槃性故」〔T10n0279 0275c20〕澄觀:「五所顯理,謂即寂滅。今了性淨涅槃,法本不然,今則無滅,方為究竟之滅。是知其輪本來常清淨也。」〔T35n1735 0883c21〕
知聲如響本義「知聲如響而轉法輪,了於諸法真實性故」〔T10n0279 0275c22〕澄觀判為後四之第二:「二即用而寂深也。」〔T35n1735 0883c24〕;法藏:「二中先標甚深,實性故者釋成深義。」〔T35n1733 0414c19〕
畢竟無主本義「於一音中出一切音而轉法輪,畢竟無主故」〔T10n0279 0275c23〕澄觀:「三一即多而無主」〔T35n1735 0883c25〕;法藏:「以各從緣成,無自體故,同為一性,悉是法輪。」〔T35n1733 0414c21〕
無遺無盡本義「無遺無盡而轉法輪,內外無著故」〔T10n0279 0275c24〕澄觀:「四即橫竪而恒虛,謂橫則無遺,無所不轉故。竪則無盡,窮未來故。而不著內外,則深廣無涯矣。」〔T35n1735 0883c25〕
言音實相本義「一切眾生種種語言,皆悉不離如來法輪。何以故?言音實相即法輪故」〔T10n0279 0276a03〕本義判分齊之句;60 本作「一切音聲不離法輪音聲故」〔T09n0278 0627c24〕,開合異,見目四
究竟無礙無畏本義「如來、應、正等覺有三昧,名:究竟無礙無畏」〔T10n0279 0276a10〕澄觀:「說法所依之定名者,無礙辯才無所怯畏。得究竟者,唯佛有故。」〔T35n1735 0884a10〕;法藏:「無礙者,是辯才也。無畏者,言無怯懼。」〔T35n1733 0415a07〕
隨順一切佛法本義「能如是知轉法輪者,當知此人則為隨順一切佛法」〔T10n0279 0276a13〕法藏繫於知益門:「明如上而知順大菩提,不爾即非。」〔T35n1733 0415a11〕;60 本作「隨順一切佛家」〔T09n0278 0628a05〕

三、譬喻·修辭

(一) 文字無盡喻——「佛子!譬如一切文字語言,盡未來劫說不可盡;佛轉法輪亦復如是,一切文字安立顯示,無有休息,無有窮盡。」〔T10n0279 0275c25〕:

  • 喻依:一切文字語言,窮盡未來劫也說不完。
  • 喻體:佛轉法輪以一切文字安立顯示,無休無盡。
  • 所顯義:澄觀判為「一文字無盡喻,喻第九無盡」〔T35n1735 0883c28〕;法藏判為第三無盡門:「明無盡門,於中先文字無盡喻,後合法輪無盡可知。」〔T35n1733 0414c24〕

(二) 書字遍入無住喻——「譬如書字,普入一切事、一切語、一切算數、一切世間出世間處而無所住;如來音聲亦復如是,普入一切處、一切眾生、一切法、一切業、一切報中而無所住。」〔T10n0279 0275c29〕:

  • 喻依:書寫之字母遍入一切事、語、算數、世出世處,而不住於其中任一處。
  • 喻體:如來音聲遍入一切處、眾生、法、業、報,而無所住。
  • 所顯義:澄觀判為「二遍入無住喻,喻六七八用而常寂故」〔T35n1735 0883c29〕,並判其內為法·喻·合三段,合中二:「先合普入一切。以上法中但云入一切言故,今明入餘法則觸類皆法輪」〔T35n1735 0884a01〕。法藏判為第四無住門:「於中有法、喻、合三也。字母無住喻,喻入緣無住德。於中一切處,是總也。別舉五處可知。」〔T35n1733 0414c26〕

(三) 喻之取捨——澄觀誌前五句不設喻之由:「前五易故,略不喻之。」〔T35n1735 0884a05〕——設喻唯為後四相用深廣之句,是本義修辭之樞。

(四) 帝王輪之喻源——法輪一名本自輪王之輪,《鈔》開四義:

「略有四義:一圓滿義,具轂輻輞軸等體用周備故。二摧壞義,摧壞煩惱,如摧未伏等。三鎮遏義,已伏煩惱,令勢轉遠故,如鎮已伏。四不定義,從見至修,修至無學;從自至他,他信至解,解至行果等。」〔T36n1736 0629a11〕

又以轂輻輞配八聖道:「正見思惟如轂,是根本故。正語業命說名為輻,由轂有故。正念動定說名為輞,攝錄餘故。」〔T36n1736 0629a27〕

(五) 頌中之喻對位——重頌「譬如文字無盡時,十力法輪亦如是」〔T10n0279 0276a20〕頌前喻一,「如字普入而無至,正覺法輪亦復然」〔T10n0279 0276a21〕頌前喻二——頌不出新喻,唯對位。


四、異譯對勘

本義之漢譯校本:實叉難陀 T279(底本·〈如來出現品第三十七〉第八義)· 佛馱跋陀羅 T278(晉譯六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品第三十二〉之三〔T09n0278 0627c05〕起–〔0628a07〕訖·重頌訖〔0628a28〕)。本義無別行經、無牒經論釋〔查無〕。以下逐句全錄不判。

句一 徵問

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279佛子!菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺轉法輪?T10n0279 0275c14
佛馱 T278佛子!云何菩薩摩訶薩知、見如來、應供、等正覺轉法輪?T09n0278 0627c05

異文所繫:(甲) 佛號 80 作「如來、應、正等覺」、60 作「如來、應供、等正覺」。(乙) 80 通篇作「知」,60 作「知、見」二字連舉。

句二 體性諸句之開合

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279以心自在力無起無轉而轉法輪,知一切法恒無起故;以三種轉斷所應斷而轉法輪,知一切法離邊見故;離欲際、非際而轉法輪,入一切法虛空際故;無有言說而轉法輪,知一切法不可說故;究竟寂滅而轉法輪,知一切法涅槃性故T10n0279 0275c15
佛馱 T278此菩薩摩訶薩知、見如來一切願、一切法,轉無所轉,本無所起,三轉圓滿,皆悉清淨,悉能遠離一切邪見,離欲際非際。一切諸法,如虛空際不可言說,一切法寂滅涅槃性故T09n0278 0627c06

異文所繫:(甲) 80 為『標·釋』九對之句式〔澄觀「皆先標、後釋」〔T35n1735 0883c08〕〕,60 為連綴之長句,無一一標釋之對。(乙) 60 別出「一切願」「皆悉清淨」二目,為 80 所無——法藏之十義正依此二目立第一「法輪所依」與第六『梵輪·性淨』〔T35n1733 0414c06〕。(丙) 80「離邊見」〔T10n0279 0275c18〕↔ 60「遠離一切邪見」。

句三 一音與無盡

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279於一音中出一切音而轉法輪,畢竟無主故;無遺無盡而轉法輪,內外無著故。T10n0279 0275c23
佛馱 T278知、見一切音聲皆是一聲,如來以此而轉法輪,佛轉法輪無有主故;知、見轉法輪無漏無盡,內外無所有故。T09n0278 0627c12

異文所繫:(甲) 80「於一音中出一切音」〔T10n0279 0275c23〕〔一出多〕↔ 60「一切音聲皆是一聲」〔T09n0278 0627c12〕〔多歸一〕,能所之向相反。(乙) 80『無遺無盡』↔ 60「無漏無盡」。(丙) 80「內外無著」↔ 60「內外無所有」。

句四 書字喻

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279譬如書字,普入一切事、一切語、一切算數、一切世間出世間處而無所住T10n0279 0275c29
佛馱 T278譬如字章,悉入一切字數、一切事數、一切語言數、一切算數、一切世間、出世間而無所住T09n0278 0627c19

異文所繫:80「書字」↔ 60「字章」;60 別出「一切字數」一目,所入之目 80 三、60 四。

句五 音聲遍入之合

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如來音聲亦復如是,普入一切處、一切眾生、一切法、一切業、一切報中而無所住。T10n0279 0276a01
佛馱 T278如來音聲亦復如是,於一切處,無所不入,於一切眾生、一切法、一切業、一切報、一切心,亦無所住。T09n0278 0627c21

異文所繫:60 於所入之目多出「一切心」一目;澄觀所判「別舉五處」與法藏所判「別舉五處可知」〔T35n1733 0414c27〕之數,二本各依所疏之本。

句六 分齊句〔本義最要之異〕

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279一切眾生種種語言,皆悉不離如來法輪。何以故?言音實相即法輪故。T10n0279 0276a03
佛馱 T278一切眾生諸語言法,皆為法輪音聲所攝。何以故?一切音聲不離法輪音聲故。T09n0278 0627c23

異文所繫:80 之釋由作「言音實相即法輪」——就實相立;60 之釋由作「一切音聲不離法輪音聲」〔T09n0278 0627c24〕——就音聲相攝立。法藏於六十本繫此句為第五分齊門〔T35n1733 0414c28〕,澄觀於八十本則繫為喻合之第二段「正合前文入一切語」〔T35n1735 0884a04〕。照實錄,不強解。

句七 出生處

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如來隨一切眾生心行欲樂無量差別,出若干音聲而轉法輪。T10n0279 0276a08
佛馱 T278如來以一切眾生念念心心行等音聲,為一切眾生而轉法輪。T09n0278 0627c27

異文所繫:80 出「欲樂無量差別」一目,60 出「念念心心行等」一目。

句八 三昧與出音

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如來、應、正等覺有三昧,名:究竟無礙無畏,入此三昧已,於成正覺一一身、一一口,各出一切眾生數等言音,一一音中眾音具足,各各差別而轉法輪,令一切眾生皆生歡喜。T10n0279 0276a10
佛馱 T278如來、應供、等正覺有三昧,名曰究竟無礙無畏,如來正受三昧,而轉法輪。如來入此三昧已,出生一切眾生等音,於一一音中,復生一切眾生等音,而轉法輪,悉令眾生皆大歡喜。T09n0278 0627c29

異文所繫:80 別出「於成正覺一一身、一一口」〔T10n0279 0276a11〕一目,繫前第七義成正覺;60 無此目而別出「如來正受三昧,而轉法輪」〔T09n0278 0628a01〕一句。

句九 得失結勸

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279能如是知轉法輪者,當知此人則為隨順一切佛法;不如是知,則非隨順。T10n0279 0276a13
佛馱 T278佛子!若如是知轉法輪者,當知是人,則為隨順一切佛家,不如是知,則不隨順諸如來家。T09n0278 0628a04

異文所繫:80 作「隨順一切佛法」,60 作「隨順一切佛家」「不隨順諸如來家」——法↔家之異,60 就種姓說、80 就法說。

句十 重頌首偈與頌數

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279如來法輪無所轉,三世無起亦無得,譬如文字無盡時,十力法輪亦如是。T10n0279 0276a19
佛馱 T278如來轉法輪,三世無不至,所轉無所轉,求之不可得。T09n0278 0628a09

異文所繫:(甲) 80 頌為七言五頌,60 頌為五言十頌。(乙) 頌數之判:澄觀於八十本作「偈有五頌」〔T35n1735 0884a12〕,法藏於六十本作「頌中十偈」〔T35n1733 0415a12〕——二本頌數本異,二疏各依所疏之本,全錄不判。(丙) 60 首偈作「三世無不至」〔T09n0278 0628a09〕〔就遍說〕,80 首句作「三世無起亦無得」〔T10n0279 0276a19〕〔就無說〕。

句十一 末偈

校本逐字出處
實叉 T279文字不從內外出,亦不失壞無積聚,而為眾生轉法輪,如是自在甚奇特。T10n0279 0276a27
佛馱 T278譬如諸文字,不內亦不外,無漏不可盡,亦復無積聚。T09n0278 0628a25

異文所繫:80 以一頌兼收文字之喻與轉輪之自在;60 分為二頌,末更出「十力亦如是,轉清淨法輪,無漏不可盡,諸佛大神力」〔T09n0278 0628a27〕。


五、宗義之經據〔眼〕

(一) 無起無轉而轉——即事契真——九句之首「以心自在力無起無轉而轉法輪,知一切法恒無起故」〔T10n0279 0275c15〕。澄觀以五門收轉法輪之全體,而下一斷語:

「夫轉法輪不過此五,今皆即事契真。」〔T35n1735 0883c10〕

《鈔》釋此句云:「揀實異權,名數則同,意旨懸隔。」〔T36n1736 0629b25〕——名數與諸教同,而所指不同,是本義判位之眼。

(二) 法輪五體與今經五句之相攝——《鈔》以大乘貫通諸說立五體:

「體總有五:一輪自性,謂擇法覺支、正見正知等,通見修無學,或取八聖道具輪輻轂輞故。」〔T36n1736 0629a25〕 「二者法輪因,謂能生後聖道諸教聞思修等」〔T36n1736 0629a29〕 「三法輪眷屬,聖道助伴五蘊諸法。四法輪境,聖道所緣四諦、因緣、三性等理。五法輪果,謂因道所證菩提涅槃無為等果。」〔T36n1736 0629b02〕

而以今經五句攝之:

「今經五句即攝此五,一能轉心即是眷屬、二即自性、三即第五、四即第二、五即第四。」〔T36n1736 0629b06〕

又以《瑜伽》五相攝之:「今經五句即攝彼五,一即第四令他信解、二即第二、三即第三、四即第五、五即第一。」〔T36n1736 0629b16〕

(三) 言音實相即法輪——「一切眾生種種語言,皆悉不離如來法輪。何以故?言音實相即法輪故。」〔T10n0279 0276a03〕——法輪之分齊不限於佛聲。澄觀合此段云:

「以上法中但云入一切言故,今明入餘法則觸類皆法輪,豈同三乘但用佛聲為輪等耶?」〔T35n1735 0884a02〕

法藏於六十本立第五分齊門,三判並列〔誌錄不判·見目六〕。

(四) 法輪本淨——「究竟寂滅而轉法輪,知一切法涅槃性故」〔T10n0279 0275c20〕。澄觀:「是知其輪本來常清淨也。」〔T35n1735 0883c22〕法藏於六十本「皆悉清淨」句下引經證:「其輪本來常清淨」〔T35n1733 0414c11〕——輪體本淨而後有轉,是性起門下『轉而無轉』之經據。

(五) 輪從願起——60 本首列「一切願」,法藏釋之為「是法輪所依」〔T35n1733 0414c06〕;與本品第五義所明智海從往昔大願生起同一骨脈——果德之施亦是舊願現行〔誌錄不判〕。

(六) 三昧為說法所依——「如來、應、正等覺有三昧,名:究竟無礙無畏,入此三昧已」〔T10n0279 0276a10〕。法藏:「謂欲轉法輪入此三昧者,是所依門故也。」〔T35n1733 0415a06〕澄觀:「得究竟者,唯佛有故。」〔T35n1735 0884a11〕——無畏之辯才唯佛究竟,是佛與二乘說法之分齊所在。


六、諸家異釋(古德·標宗)

澄觀《華嚴經疏》T35n1735(八十華嚴逐文·主)

九句之開合:

「文有九句,減數十也,皆先標、後釋。前五顯體性寂寥,後四辨相用深廣。」〔T35n1735 0883c07〕

前五之逐釋:

「一能轉心者,由知法無起故,正轉法時不起心念,言我轉授前人,名心自在,如是方為真能轉也。」〔T35n1735 0883c11〕 「二所轉體者,即示勸證,名為三轉。此三名輪者,摧障惱故。言離邊者,若有惑可摧,未離於常;無惑可摧,寧免於斷?今永離斷常等邊,方為真能斷所應斷,知與證修亦然。」〔T35n1735 0883c13〕 「三所得果者,由斷惑故,得離欲際;由證性空,本無可離,斯際亦遣。」〔T35n1735 0883c17〕 「四能詮教者,理假言詮,今了本寂,滅不可說故,則終日言而未曾言也。」〔T35n1735 0883c19〕 「五所顯理,謂即寂滅。今了性淨涅槃,法本不然,今則無滅,方為究竟之滅。」〔T35n1735 0883c21〕

後四之逐釋:

「後四相用深廣中,一觸言皆輪廣也;二即用而寂深也。下二亦深亦廣。三一即多而無主;四即橫竪而恒虛,謂橫則無遺,無所不轉故。竪則無盡,窮未來故。而不著內外,則深廣無涯矣。」〔T35n1735 0883c23〕

顯所因:

「明因所起輪。物既為力不同,教須適宜差別。」〔T35n1735 0884a08〕 「說法所依之定名者,無礙辯才無所怯畏。得究竟者,唯佛有故。」〔T35n1735 0884a10〕 「及第三總結,文並可知。」〔T35n1735 0884a12〕

澄觀《隨疏演義鈔》T36n1736

三門總釋:「今略以三門分別:一釋名、二出體、三轉相。」〔T36n1736 0629a07〕

轉之四義:

「轉謂動也、顯也、運也、起也。動宣言教,顯揚妙理,運聖道於聲前,起真智於言後,圓摧障惱,名轉法輪。」〔T36n1736 0629a18〕

出體與轉相之相似:「然上出體與其轉相皆大乘意,細尋二門多有相似,或應為一。」〔T36n1736 0629b21〕

法藏《探玄記》T35n1733(六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品〉疏)

十義明體相:

「初中略以十義明其體相:一一切願者,是法輪所依;二一切法者,是所轉之法;三轉無所轉者,會相明體;四本無所起者,稱性辨體;五三轉圓滿者,德相圓滿,謂示相、勸知、引證為三也」〔T35n1733 0414c05〕 「七悉能等者,離障故、破見故、業用故;八離欲等者,離無所離故;九一切諸法等者,離言故;十一切法等者,離相故。」〔T35n1733 0414c11〕

深廣門四義:

「明深廣門,於中有四義,各有標、釋。初一廣、次一深、後二亦深亦廣。」〔T35n1733 0414c15〕 「二中先標甚深,實性故者釋成深義。三中先標深廣,佛轉法輪無主故者釋成。以各從緣成,無自體故,同為一性,悉是法輪。」〔T35n1733 0414c19〕 「四中先標,無流故深也、無盡故廣也,內外無所有者釋成也。」〔T35n1733 0414c22〕

分齊門三判:

「若小乘,一說五音是法輪聲,餘問阿難天雨等皆非法輪攝。若三乘中,佛一切音聲等皆是法輪,餘即皆非。若一乘,一切眾生言音等亦入法輪,約用皆得成法輪故。」〔T35n1733 0414c29〕

出生門與知益門:

「先通辨,謂欲轉法輪入此三昧者,是所依門故也。無礙者,是辯才也。無畏者,言無怯懼。」〔T35n1733 0415a06〕 「正顯出生多音,釋成總中眾生念心等音也。悉令眾生等者,稱根授法故令喜也。」〔T35n1733 0415a09〕 「明如上而知順大菩提,不爾即非。」〔T35n1733 0415a11〕

頌科:

「頌中十偈:初一頌初體相門、次一頌第三無盡門、次二頌半頌第四無住門、次三頌半頌第六出生門、末後二頌却頌第二深廣門。」〔T35n1733 0415a12〕

  • 義疏所引法藏語逐字之補錄:「如來音聲,於一切世間文字語言無不至故,皆轉法輪也。」〔T35n1733 0414c18–19〕(義疏『所以然』句所本)

李通玄《新華嚴經論》T36n1739

本義專屬科段未見(查核未見獨立引句)——〔查無〕。

誌錄不判:本義之科,澄觀於八十本作『顯體用·顯所因』二分而下開九句〔前五·後四〕,法藏於六十本作七門〔體相·深廣·無盡·無住·分齊·出生·知益〕而下開十義;九句與十義之數,繫於二本經文開合本異(60 本別出「一切願」「皆悉清淨」二目)。分齊之判,法藏列小乘·三乘·一乘三說,澄觀於八十本則以「觸類皆法輪」對「三乘但用佛聲為輪」〔T35n1735 0884a03〕設問。頌數之判,澄觀依八十本作五頌、法藏依六十本作十偈。九句十義孰為正科、分齊三判之取捨、二本頌數之開合——古有異說,誌錄之,不判。


七、互讀·承衍

  • 六十華嚴〈寶王如來性起品〉〔T09n0278 0627c05–0628a28〕:本義之異譯全本,場景結構全同(徵問·體性諸句·文字無盡喻·字章遍入喻·分齊句·出生處·三昧·得失結勸·重頌),逐句對勘見目四。
  • 本品第五義『出現境界』:彼明智海從往昔大願生起,此明輪體本淨而無起無轉;法藏於六十本二義並標「性起」之名〔T35n1733 0414c02〕——境與輪同出性起一門〔誌錄不判〕。
  • 本品第七義『成正覺』:本義「於成正覺一一身、一一口,各出一切眾生數等言音」〔T10n0279 0276a11〕逕承前義之果;澄觀來意「得大菩提,理必轉授」〔T35n1735 0883c04〕即繫此。
  • 法藏《華嚴一乘教義分齊章》T45n1866:「性起」六見〔0485b11 · 0486a05 · 0489c06 · 0498c10 · 0507a10–11〕,皆泛引性起品之說,本義(轉法輪)無專項牒句——〔查無〕。
  • 《大乘起信論》T32n1666:以「性起」檢之,0 命中——〔查無〕。
  • T45n1868 · T45n1883:以「轉法輪」檢之,各 0 命中——〔查無〕。
  • 承衍論(成唯識論 T31n1585 · 攝大乘論 T31n1594 · 瑜伽師地論 T30n1579):本義之直接牒文未檢得;唯澄觀《鈔》引《瑜伽》九十五五相以攝今經五句〔T36n1736 0629b11〕,為古德所引之橋,非本義自有之承衍。據實標闕,不以他處之文充之。

八、校本定位

  • 實叉 T279(底本):品三十七〈如來出現品〉第八義 轉法輪〔T10n0279 0275c14〕起–〔0276a29〕前訖(第七會 重會普光明殿·卷五十二)。段序:徵問〔0275c14〕· 九句體用〔0275c15–0275c24〕· 文字無盡喻〔0275c25〕· 遍入無住喻與法合〔0275c28–0276a02〕· 分齊句〔0276a03〕· 結勸〔0276a05〕· 顯所因徵起〔0276a06〕· 隨機出音〔0276a08〕· 三昧出音〔0276a10〕· 得失結勸〔0276a13〕· 總結〔0276a15〕· 重頌五頌〔0276a17–0276a27〕。
  • 佛馱 T278(晉譯主對校):〈寶王如來性起品第三十二〉〔T09n0278 0627c05〕起–〔0628a28〕訖(卷三十五〈之四〉界處於頌後〔0628b02–0628b05〕)。徵問 0627c05 · 體性諸句 0627c06 · 文字無盡喻 0627c15 · 字章遍入喻 0627c18 · 分齊句 0627c23 · 出生法門 0627c25 · 三昧 0627c29 · 得失結勸 0628a04 · 結 0628a06 · 重頌起 0628a08(首偈 0628a09 · 末二偈 0628a25 · 0628a27)。
  • 澄觀《疏》T35n1735:第八明出現轉法輪 0883c04 起–0884a14 前訖。來意 0883c04 · 長行三分 0883c05 · 釋相二分 0883c05 · 法喻結勸三分 0883c06 · 九句總判 0883c08 · 前五名目 0883c09 · 即事契真 0883c10 · 能轉心 0883c11 · 三轉與離邊 0883c13 · 所得果 0883c17 · 能詮教 0883c19 · 所顯理 0883c21 · 後四相用 0883c23 · 二喻科 0883c29 · 合中二 0884a01 · 正合入一切語 0884a04 · 略不喻之 0884a05 · 結勸與顯所因 0884a06 · 輪所起因 0884a07 · 因所起輪 0884a08 · 定名 0884a11 · 結得失與總結 0884a11 · 偈有五頌 0884a12。
  • 澄觀《鈔》T36n1736:義八段起 0629a06。三門 0629a07 · 梵輪 0629a09 · 釋名 0629a10 · 輪四義 0629a11 · 總釋轉 0629a16 · 轉四義 0629a18 · 出體五 0629a24 · 輪自性 0629a25 · 法輪因 0629a29 · 眷屬境果 0629b02 · 五句攝五體 0629b06 · 瑜伽五相 0629b11 · 五句攝彼五 0629b16 · 出體轉相相似 0629b21 · 揀實異權 0629b25 · 示相轉 0629b27。〔誌錄〕本節逐字所核止於起段起首,其後之文未核,非謂其無。
  • 法藏《探玄記》T35n1733:第八明性起轉法輪 0414c01 起–0415a16 前訖。科名與三分 0414c01 · 七門 0414c03 · 十義 0414c05 · 梵輪性淨 0414c09 · 七至十義 0414c11 · 深廣門 0414c15 · 深廣四義釋 0414c19 · 無自體同一性 0414c21 · 第四義 0414c22 · 無盡門 0414c23 · 無住門 0414c25 · 分齊門 0414c28 · 三判 0414c29 · 出生門 0415a04 · 通辨與無礙無畏 0415a06 · 出生多音 0415a09 · 知益門 0415a11 · 頌科 0415a12。
  • 李通玄《論》T36n1739:本義專屬科段〔查無〕。
  • 異讀:本單元 T279 範圍〔0275c14〕–〔0276a28〕內大正校記 2 條,逐條照錄不判(底本【大】|他本異讀;多本異讀以/分列):〔0275c18〕見【大】|無此字【聖】 · 〔0276a21〕覺【大】|學【聖】。夾注已於原典層剝除誌錄。
  • 異讀補記:CBETA 回改 1 條(不入上列大正校記之數):〔0275c21〕以一【CB】|一【大】/以一【明】。

The eighth sense, ‘the turning of the wheel of the Dharma’, = Samantabhadra’s answer to 「菩薩摩訶薩應云何知如來、應、正等覺轉法輪」 tr. “how should the bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the turning of the wheel of the Dharma by the Tathāgata, the Arhat, the Perfectly Awakened One” 〔T10n0279 0275c14〕. The preceding sense, the accomplishing of right awakening, made clear the realizing of the virtue of the fruit; this sense makes clear the bestowing of the virtue of the fruit — having realized, he must of necessity transmit, and therefore it comes next. The prose first makes clear the substance and function of the turning in nine clauses 〔the first five reveal the substance and nature, the latter four discern the characteristic and function〕; next it sets up the simile of the inexhaustibility of letters and the simile of the universal entry of written graphs; and it concludes with the single sentence 「言音實相即法輪故」 tr. “because the true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma” 〔T10n0279 0276a04〕. The latter part separately reveals the place where the wheel of the Dharma is born, attaching it to the samādhi 「究竟無礙無畏」 tr. “Ultimate Unobstructedness and Fearlessness”, and at the end judges the gain and loss of the one who knows by according and not according. The five verses in repetition are matched to the prose. Chengguan judges the five gates of substance and function in this passage with the words 「今皆即事契真」 tr. “here all of them tally with the real in the very midst of the phenomenal”, while Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, judges it to be 「性起轉法輪」 tr. “the turning of the wheel of the Dharma as nature-arising” and opens it into seven gates, listing under the gate of bounds the three judgements of the lesser vehicle · the three vehicles · the one vehicle — this is the place where the bone of the school is most plainly seen in this sense, and also the place that most requires recording without adjudication.


I. Doctrinal Outline and Placement

Outline systemThe place of this sense within it
The base text T279, in thirty-nine chaptersChapter thirty-seven, the Chapter on the Appearance of the Tathāgata (the seventh assembly, the return to the palace of Universal Light) · the eighth sense, the turning of the wheel of the Dharma, beginning 〔T10n0279 0275c14〕 and ending 〔up to just before 0276a29〕
Chengguan, Huayan jing shuEighth, making clear the turning of the wheel of the Dharma in the appearance, beginning 〔T35n1735 0883c04〕 and ending 〔up to just before 0884a14〕; the prose in three = the raising of the question · the explanation of the characteristics · the general conclusion, the explanation of the characteristics in two = revealing the substance and function · revealing whence it comes, with the five verses discerned at the end
Chengguan, Yanyi chaoThe outline heading 「第八出現轉大法輪」 tr. “eighth, the turning of the great wheel of the Dharma in the appearance” begins 〔T36n1736 0629a06〕; separately, he explains the sense of the wheel of the Dharma as a whole under three gates — explaining the name · setting out the substance · the characteristics of the turning
Fazang, Tanxuan ji (the commentary on the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata in the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka)Eighth, making clear the turning of the wheel of the Dharma as nature-arising, beginning 〔T35n1733 0414c01〕 and ending 〔up to just before 0415a16〕; the prose in three = setting up the gate · discerning and explaining · concluding the knowing, the explaining being opened into seven gates
Li Tongxuan, Xin Huayan jing lunNo outline division belonging specifically to this sense, with its own beginning and end, is found (on examination no independent citation is found) 〔not found〕

The reason for its coming — Chengguan attaches this eighth sense to the seventh sense before it, ‘the accomplishing of right awakening’, making clear the order of realizing and bestowing:

「得大菩提,理必轉授。」 tr. “Having gained the great awakening, in principle he must of necessity turn it over and transmit it.” 〔T35n1735 0883c04〕

Fazang attaches it on the same principle, and gives it the name 「性起轉法輪」 tr. “the turning of the wheel of the Dharma as nature-arising”:

「第八明性起轉法輪,謂前得菩提,次轉法輪,以為次第。長行中三,標門、辨釋、結知。」 tr. “Eighth, making clear the turning of the wheel of the Dharma as nature-arising: that is, before, he gained awakening, and next he turns the wheel of the Dharma — such is the order. Within the prose there are three: setting up the gate, discerning and explaining, and concluding the knowing.” 〔T35n1733 0414c01〕

The prose in three parts (Chengguan) —

「長行中三:初標徵、次釋相、後總結。就釋相中二:先顯體用、後顯所因。」 tr. “Within the prose there are three: first the setting up and raising of the question, next the explanation of the characteristics, and last the general conclusion. Within the explanation of the characteristics there are two: first the revealing of the substance and function, and after that the revealing of whence it comes.” 〔T35n1735 0883c05〕

The inner outline of the revealing of substance and function:

「今初,分三:初法、次喻、後結勸。今初,文有九句,減數十也,皆先標、後釋。前五顯體性寂寥,後四辨相用深廣。」 tr. “Here in the first, it divides into three: first the Dharma stated, next the simile, and after that the concluding exhortation. Here in the first, the text has nine clauses, one short of the number ten; each first sets up and afterward explains. The first five reveal that the substance and nature are still and vacant; the latter four discern that the characteristic and function are profound and vast.” 〔T35n1735 0883c06〕

The names of the first five:

「前中,一能轉心、二所轉體、三所得果、四能詮教、五所顯理。夫轉法輪不過此五,今皆即事契真。」 tr. “Among the former: first, the mind that turns; second, the substance that is turned; third, the fruit that is gained; fourth, the teaching that expresses; fifth, the principle that is revealed. Now, the turning of the wheel of the Dharma goes no further than these five; here all of them tally with the real in the very midst of the phenomenal.” 〔T35n1735 0883c09〕

The outline of the section of similes:

「文有二喻:一文字無盡喻,喻第九無盡;二遍入無住喻,喻六七八用而常寂故。」 tr. “The text has two similes: first, the simile of the inexhaustibility of letters, which is a simile for the inexhaustibility of the ninth clause; second, the simile of universal entry without abiding, which is a simile for the sixth, seventh, and eighth, since they are in function and yet constantly still.” 〔T35n1735 0883c28〕

The outline of the revealing of whence it comes:

「於中三:先辨輪所起因,因機差故。若離物機,佛無說故。」 tr. “Within this there are three: first, discerning the cause from which the wheel arises, since the cause is the difference of capacities. For if one were apart from the capacities of beings, the Buddha would have nothing to say.” 〔T35n1735 0884a07〕

The verses — Chengguan: 「偈有五頌」 tr. “the verses are five” 〔T35n1735 0884a12〕; and again 「初二偈頌法輪體用」 tr. “the first two verses praise the substance and function of the wheel of the Dharma” 〔0884a13〕.

Fazang’s seven gates —

「釋中有七門分別轉法輪義:一體相、二深廣、三無盡、四無住、五分齊、六出生、七知益。」 tr. “Within the explanation there are seven gates that discern the sense of the turning of the wheel of the Dharma: first, substance and characteristic; second, profound and vast; third, inexhaustibility; fourth, non-abiding; fifth, bounds; sixth, giving birth; seventh, the benefit of knowing.” 〔T35n1733 0414c03〕


II. Terminology

TermWhere attestedThe essential sense
The turning of the wheel of the DharmaThe title of this whole sense 〔T10n0279 0275c14〕Chengguan’s Chao, explaining the name: 「法即軌持,輪者如帝王輪,從喻得名。」 tr. “Dharma means that which keeps to a track and holds; the wheel is like the wheel of an emperor, and the name is got from the simile.” 〔T36n1736 0629a10〕 And again, explaining as a whole: 「流演圓通名之為輪,自我之彼故名為轉。」 tr. “Flowing forth and running round unhindered, it is named a wheel; going from oneself to another, it is therefore named a turning.” 〔T36n1736 0629a16〕
The Brahmā wheelAnother name for the wheel of the DharmaThe Chao: 「亦名梵輪,如來大梵之所轉故。」 tr. “It is also named the Brahmā wheel, because it is turned by the Tathāgata, the great Brahmā.” 〔T36n1736 0629a09〕; Fazang likewise attaches it to the clause 「皆悉清淨」 tr. “all of them are pure”: 「是梵輪故、性淨故」 tr. “because it is the Brahmā wheel, because its nature is pure” 〔T35n1733 0414c10〕
The power of the mind’s masteryIn this sense: 「以心自在力無起無轉而轉法輪」 tr. “by the power of the mind’s mastery, with nothing arisen and nothing turned, he turns the wheel of the Dharma” 〔T10n0279 0275c15〕Chengguan: 「一能轉心者,由知法無起故,正轉法時不起心念,言我轉授前人,名心自在,如是方為真能轉也。」 tr. “First, the mind that turns: because he knows that dharmas do not arise, at the very time of turning the Dharma he does not raise the thought that says ‘I am turning it over and transmitting it to the person before me’; this is named the mind’s mastery, and only thus is it truly a turning.” 〔T35n1735 0883c11〕
The three turningsIn this sense: 「以三種轉斷所應斷而轉法輪」 tr. “by the three turnings he cuts off what ought to be cut off, and so turns the wheel of the Dharma” 〔T10n0279 0275c17〕Chengguan: 「二所轉體者,即示勸證,名為三轉。此三名輪者,摧障惱故。」 tr. “Second, the substance that is turned: that is, demonstrating, exhorting, and witnessing, which are named the three turnings. That these three are named a wheel is because they crush obstruction and vexation.” 〔T35n1735 0883c13〕; Fazang has 「謂示相、勸知、引證為三也」 tr. “that is, demonstrating the characteristics, exhorting to knowing, and adducing witness make the three” 〔T35n1733 0414c09〕
The turning that demonstrates the characteristicsThe first of the three turningsThe Chao: 「第一示相轉者,諸佛世尊正證諸法,隨何等器而指示之。如轉四諦,言此身是苦、業惑為集、此滅為滅、能滅為道。」 tr. “As for the first, the turning that demonstrates the characteristics: the buddhas, the world-honored ones, having rightly realized all dharmas, point them out according to what sort of vessel one is. As when they turn the four truths, saying, this body is suffering, deeds and afflictions are its arising, this cessation is cessation, and what is able to bring cessation is the path.” 〔T36n1736 0629b27〕
Apart from extreme viewsIn this sense: 「知一切法離邊見故」 tr. “because he knows that all dharmas are apart from extreme views” 〔T10n0279 0275c17〕Chengguan: 「言離邊者,若有惑可摧,未離於常;無惑可摧,寧免於斷?今永離斷常等邊,方為真能斷所應斷」 tr. “As for the words ‘apart from the extremes’: if there were an affliction that could be crushed, one would not yet be apart from permanence; and if there were no affliction that could be crushed, how would one escape annihilation? Now, being forever apart from the extremes of annihilation and permanence and the rest, only then is it truly a cutting off of what ought to be cut off” 〔T35n1735 0883c15〕
Apart from the limit of desire, and apart from limit as suchIn this sense: 「離欲際、非際而轉法輪,入一切法虛空際故」 tr. “apart from the limit of desire and apart from limit as such he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he enters that limit of all dharmas which is like space” 〔T10n0279 0275c18〕Chengguan: 「三所得果者,由斷惑故,得離欲際;由證性空,本無可離,斯際亦遣。」 tr. “Third, the fruit that is gained: because he cuts off affliction, he gains the limit that is freedom from desire; and because he realizes that the nature is empty, there was from the first nothing to be free from, and so this limit too is dispelled.” 〔T35n1735 0883c17〕
Utter quiescenceIn this sense: 「究竟寂滅而轉法輪,知一切法涅槃性故」 tr. “in utter quiescence he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are of the nature of nirvāṇa” 〔T10n0279 0275c20〕Chengguan: 「五所顯理,謂即寂滅。今了性淨涅槃,法本不然,今則無滅,方為究竟之滅。是知其輪本來常清淨也。」 tr. “Fifth, the principle that is revealed, namely quiescence itself. Now, understanding the nirvāṇa that is pure by nature, dharmas were from the first not aflame, and so now there is no extinguishing; and only this is the utter extinguishing. From this one knows that this wheel is from the first constantly pure.” 〔T35n1735 0883c21〕
Knowing that sound is like an echoIn this sense: 「知聲如響而轉法輪,了於諸法真實性故」 tr. “knowing that sound is like an echo he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he understands the true nature of dharmas” 〔T10n0279 0275c22〕Chengguan judges it the second of the latter four: 「二即用而寂深也。」 tr. “the second is that in the very midst of function it is still — this is the profound.” 〔T35n1735 0883c24〕; Fazang: 「二中先標甚深,實性故者釋成深義。」 tr. “In the second, he first sets up ‘exceedingly profound’, and the words ‘because of the real nature’ explain and establish the sense of the profound.” 〔T35n1733 0414c19〕
Ultimately without a masterIn this sense: 「於一音中出一切音而轉法輪,畢竟無主故」 tr. “within a single sound he brings forth all sounds and turns the wheel of the Dharma, because it is ultimately without a master” 〔T10n0279 0275c23〕Chengguan: 「三一即多而無主」 tr. “the third is that the one is the many and yet without a master” 〔T35n1735 0883c25〕; Fazang: 「以各從緣成,無自體故,同為一性,悉是法輪。」 tr. “Since each is formed from conditions and has no substance of its own, they are alike of one nature, and all of them are the wheel of the Dharma.” 〔T35n1733 0414c21〕
Without omission and without exhaustionIn this sense: 「無遺無盡而轉法輪,內外無著故」 tr. “without omission and without exhaustion he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he has no attachment within or without” 〔T10n0279 0275c24〕Chengguan: 「四即橫竪而恒虛,謂橫則無遺,無所不轉故。竪則無盡,窮未來故。而不著內外,則深廣無涯矣。」 tr. “The fourth is that in the very midst of the crosswise and the upright it is ever void: crosswise it is without omission, since there is nothing it does not turn; upright it is without exhaustion, since it goes to the end of the future. And as he is attached neither within nor without, the profound and the vast are without shore.” 〔T35n1735 0883c25〕
The true character of speech-soundIn this sense: 「一切眾生種種語言,皆悉不離如來法輪。何以故?言音實相即法輪故」 tr. “all the various kinds of speech of all sentient beings are none of them apart from the Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma. Why is this? Because the true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma” 〔T10n0279 0276a03〕The sentence in which this sense judges the bounds; the sixty has 「一切音聲不離法輪音聲故」 tr. “because no sound at all is apart from the sound of the wheel of the Dharma” 〔T09n0278 0627c24〕, differing in how it is opened and folded — see item four
Ultimate Unobstructedness and FearlessnessIn this sense: 「如來、應、正等覺有三昧,名:究竟無礙無畏」 tr. “the Tathāgata, the Arhat, the Perfectly Awakened One, has a samādhi named: Ultimate Unobstructedness and Fearlessness” 〔T10n0279 0276a10〕Chengguan: 「說法所依之定名者,無礙辯才無所怯畏。得究竟者,唯佛有故。」 tr. “As for the name of the concentration on which the speaking of the Dharma depends: eloquence unobstructed, and nothing timid or feared. That it is gained ultimately is because only a buddha has it.” 〔T35n1735 0884a10〕; Fazang: 「無礙者,是辯才也。無畏者,言無怯懼。」 tr. “‘Unobstructed’ is eloquence. ‘Fearless’ means without timidity or dread.” 〔T35n1733 0415a07〕
According with all the Buddha’s DharmaIn this sense: 「能如是知轉法輪者,當知此人則為隨順一切佛法」 tr. “one who is able to know the turning of the wheel of the Dharma in this way — know that this person is one who accords with all the Buddha’s Dharma” 〔T10n0279 0276a13〕Fazang attaches it to the gate of the benefit of knowing: 「明如上而知順大菩提,不爾即非。」 tr. “It makes clear that to know as above is to accord with the great awakening, and that not to do so is not to accord.” 〔T35n1733 0415a11〕; the sixty has 「隨順一切佛家」 tr. “accords with the whole household of the buddhas” 〔T09n0278 0628a05〕

III. Similes and Rhetoric

(1) The simile of the inexhaustibility of letters — 「佛子!譬如一切文字語言,盡未來劫說不可盡;佛轉法輪亦復如是,一切文字安立顯示,無有休息,無有窮盡。」 tr. “Sons of the Buddha! It is like all letters and speech: though one spoke to the exhaustion of the kalpas of the future, they could not be told to the end; the Buddha’s turning of the wheel of the Dharma is like this too — with all letters he sets it up and reveals it, and there is no rest and no exhaustion.” 〔T10n0279 0275c25〕:

  • What the simile rests on: all letters and speech, which could not be told to the end though one spoke to the exhaustion of the kalpas of the future.
  • What the simile bears: the Buddha’s turning of the wheel of the Dharma, which with all letters sets it up and reveals it, without rest and without exhaustion.
  • The sense revealed: Chengguan judges it 「一文字無盡喻,喻第九無盡」 tr. “first, the simile of the inexhaustibility of letters, which is a simile for the inexhaustibility of the ninth clause” 〔T35n1735 0883c28〕; Fazang judges it the third, the gate of inexhaustibility: 「明無盡門,於中先文字無盡喻,後合法輪無盡可知。」 tr. “It makes clear the gate of inexhaustibility; within it, first comes the simile of the inexhaustibility of letters, and afterward the matching of it to the inexhaustibility of the wheel of the Dharma, which may be understood.” 〔T35n1733 0414c24〕

(2) The simile of written graphs entering universally without abiding — 「譬如書字,普入一切事、一切語、一切算數、一切世間出世間處而無所住;如來音聲亦復如是,普入一切處、一切眾生、一切法、一切業、一切報中而無所住。」 tr. “It is like a written graph, which enters universally into every affair, every utterance, every reckoning, and every place both worldly and world-transcending, and yet does not abide anywhere; the Tathāgata’s voice is like this too — it enters universally into every place, every sentient being, every dharma, every deed, and every recompense, and yet does not abide anywhere.” 〔T10n0279 0275c29〕:

  • What the simile rests on: the written letters of the alphabet, which enter universally into every affair, utterance, reckoning, and place worldly and world-transcending, and yet abide in none of them.
  • What the simile bears: the Tathāgata’s voice, which enters universally into every place, sentient being, dharma, deed, and recompense, and yet abides nowhere.
  • The sense revealed: Chengguan judges it 「二遍入無住喻,喻六七八用而常寂故」 tr. “second, the simile of universal entry without abiding, which is a simile for the sixth, seventh, and eighth, since they are in function and yet constantly still” 〔T35n1735 0883c29〕, and judges its inner structure to be three passages, the Dharma stated, the simile, and the matching, with two within the matching: 「先合普入一切。以上法中但云入一切言故,今明入餘法則觸類皆法輪」 tr. “first the matching of the universal entry into all. Since above, in the statement of the Dharma, it said only that it enters into all speech, here it is made clear that it enters into the remaining dharmas as well, so that whatever kind one comes upon is the wheel of the Dharma” 〔T35n1735 0884a01〕. Fazang judges it the fourth, the gate of non-abiding: 「於中有法、喻、合三也。字母無住喻,喻入緣無住德。於中一切處,是總也。別舉五處可知。」 tr. “Within it there are three, the Dharma stated, the simile, and the matching. The simile of the non-abiding of the letters of the alphabet is a simile for the virtue of entering conditions without abiding. Within it, ‘every place’ is the general; the separate raising of five places may be understood.” 〔T35n1733 0414c26〕

(3) Where the simile is given and where withheld — Chengguan records why no simile is set up for the first five clauses: 「前五易故,略不喻之。」 tr. “Because the first five are easy, they are passed over and no simile is given for them.” 〔T35n1735 0884a05〕 — the setting up of similes is only for the latter four clauses, whose characteristic and function are profound and vast; this is the pivot of the rhetoric of this sense.

(4) The source of the simile in the emperor’s wheel — the name ‘wheel of the Dharma’ comes from the wheel of the wheel-turning king, and the Chao opens four senses of it:

「略有四義:一圓滿義,具轂輻輞軸等體用周備故。二摧壞義,摧壞煩惱,如摧未伏等。三鎮遏義,已伏煩惱,令勢轉遠故,如鎮已伏。四不定義,從見至修,修至無學;從自至他,他信至解,解至行果等。」 tr. “In brief there are four senses: first, the sense of completeness, since it has hub, spokes, rim, and axle, its substance and function complete throughout. Second, the sense of crushing, in that it crushes the afflictions, as when it crushes those not yet subdued. Third, the sense of holding down, in that afflictions already subdued are made to recede further in force, as when it holds down what is already subdued. Fourth, the sense of not being fixed: from seeing to cultivation, and from cultivation to the stage beyond learning; from oneself to others, and from another’s faith to understanding, and from understanding to the fruit of practice, and so on.” 〔T36n1736 0629a11〕

And again, matching hub, spokes, and rim to the eightfold noble path: 「正見思惟如轂,是根本故。正語業命說名為輻,由轂有故。正念動定說名為輞,攝錄餘故。」 tr. “Right view and right thought are like the hub, since they are the root. Right speech, right action, and right livelihood are called the spokes, since they exist by way of the hub. Right mindfulness, which sets concentration in motion, is called the rim, since it gathers up the rest.” 〔T36n1736 0629a27〕

(5) How the similes are matched in the verses — the verse in repetition 「譬如文字無盡時,十力法輪亦如是」 tr. “just as letters have no time when they are told to the end, so too is the wheel of the Dharma of him of the ten powers” 〔T10n0279 0276a20〕 praises the first simile above, and 「如字普入而無至,正覺法輪亦復然」 tr. “just as a graph enters universally and yet arrives nowhere, so too is the wheel of the Dharma of the rightly awakened one” 〔T10n0279 0276a21〕 praises the second — the verses bring forth no new simile, but only match what is there.


IV. Collation with Parallel Translations

The Chinese witnesses for this sense: Śikṣānanda T279 (the base text · the eighth sense of the Chapter on the Appearance of the Tathāgata, chapter thirty-seven) · Buddhabhadra T278 (part three of the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata, chapter thirty-two, of the Jin translation of the Avataṃsaka in sixty fascicles, beginning 〔T09n0278 0627c05〕 and ending 〔0628a07〕, the verses in repetition ending 〔0628a28〕). This sense has no separately circulating scripture and no treatise that takes up its text 〔not found〕. What follows is recorded in full, sentence by sentence, without adjudication.

Sentence One The Raising of the Question

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279Sons of the Buddha! How should the bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the turning of the wheel of the Dharma by the Tathāgata, the Arhat, the Perfectly Awakened One?T10n0279 0275c14
Buddhabhadra T278Sons of the Buddha! How does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva know and see the turning of the wheel of the Dharma by the Tathāgata, the worthy of offerings, the rightly and fully awakened one?T09n0278 0627c05

Where the divergences lie: (a) For the epithets of the Buddha, the eighty has 「如來、應、正等覺」 tr. “the Tathāgata, the Arhat, the Perfectly Awakened One” and the sixty has 「如來、應供、等正覺」 tr. “the Tathāgata, the worthy of offerings, the rightly and fully awakened one”. (b) The eighty has 「知」 tr. “know” throughout, while the sixty raises together the two graphs 「知、見」 tr. “know and see”.

Sentence Two How the Clauses of Substance and Nature Are Opened and Folded

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279By the power of the mind’s mastery, with nothing arisen and nothing turned, he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are constantly unarisen; by the three turnings he cuts off what ought to be cut off and turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are apart from extreme views; apart from the limit of desire and apart from limit as such he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he enters that limit of all dharmas which is like space; with no speech at all he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas cannot be spoken; in utter quiescence he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are of the nature of nirvāṇaT10n0279 0275c15
Buddhabhadra T278This bodhisattva-mahāsattva knows and sees all the Tathāgata’s vows and all his dharmas: turning with nothing turned, from the first with nothing arisen, the three turnings complete, all of them pure, able wholly to be far apart from every wrong view, apart from the limit of desire and from limit as such. All dharmas, being like the limit that is space, cannot be spoken, since all dharmas are quiescent and of the nature of nirvāṇaT09n0278 0627c06

Where the divergences lie: (a) The eighty has the sentence-form of nine pairs of ‘setting up and explaining’ 〔Chengguan: 「皆先標、後釋」 tr. “each first sets up and afterward explains” 〔T35n1735 0883c08〕〕, while the sixty has one long strung-together sentence, with no pairing of setting up and explaining one by one. (b) The sixty separately brings out the two items 「一切願」 tr. “all the vows” and 「皆悉清淨」 tr. “all of them pure”, which the eighty does not have — and it is precisely on these two items that Fazang’s ten senses establish the first, 「法輪所依」 tr. “that on which the wheel of the Dharma depends”, and the sixth, ‘the Brahmā wheel · the purity of the nature’ 〔T35n1733 0414c06〕. (c) The eighty has 「離邊見」 tr. “apart from extreme views” 〔T10n0279 0275c18〕 against the sixty’s 「遠離一切邪見」 tr. “far apart from every wrong view”.

Sentence Three The Single Sound and the Inexhaustible

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279Within a single sound he brings forth all sounds and turns the wheel of the Dharma, because it is ultimately without a master; without omission and without exhaustion he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he has no attachment within or without.T10n0279 0275c23
Buddhabhadra T278He knows and sees that all sounds are alike a single sound, and by this the Tathāgata turns the wheel of the Dharma, since the Buddha’s turning of the wheel of the Dharma has no master; he knows and sees that the turning of the wheel of the Dharma is without outflow and without exhaustion, since within and without there is nothing that is.T09n0278 0627c12

Where the divergences lie: (a) The eighty has 「於一音中出一切音」 tr. “within a single sound he brings forth all sounds” 〔T10n0279 0275c23〕 〔the one issuing in the many〕, against the sixty’s 「一切音聲皆是一聲」 tr. “all sounds are alike a single sound” 〔T09n0278 0627c12〕 〔the many returning to the one〕 — the direction of what acts and what is acted on is reversed. (b) The eighty’s ‘without omission and without exhaustion’ against the sixty’s 「無漏無盡」 tr. “without outflow and without exhaustion”. (c) The eighty’s 「內外無著」 tr. “no attachment within or without” against the sixty’s 「內外無所有」 tr. “within and without there is nothing that is”.

Sentence Four The Simile of Written Graphs

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279It is like a written graph, which enters universally into every affair, every utterance, every reckoning, and every place both worldly and world-transcending, and yet does not abide anywhereT10n0279 0275c29
Buddhabhadra T278It is like the chapters of letters, which enter wholly into every count of letters, every count of affairs, every count of speech, every reckoning, and all that is worldly and world-transcending, and yet do not abide anywhereT09n0278 0627c19

Where the divergences lie: the eighty has 「書字」 tr. “a written graph” against the sixty’s 「字章」 tr. “the chapters of letters”; the sixty separately brings out the one item 「一切字數」 tr. “every count of letters”, so that of the items entered the eighty has three and the sixty four.

Sentence Five The Matching of the Universal Entry of the Voice

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279The Tathāgata’s voice is like this too: it enters universally into every place, every sentient being, every dharma, every deed, and every recompense, and yet does not abide anywhere.T10n0279 0276a01
Buddhabhadra T278The Tathāgata’s voice is like this too: in every place there is nowhere it does not enter, and in every sentient being, every dharma, every deed, every recompense, and every mind, it likewise does not abide.T09n0278 0627c21

Where the divergences lie: among the items entered, the sixty brings out one more item, 「一切心」 tr. “every mind”; and as for the number in Chengguan’s judgement 「別舉五處」 tr. “the separate raising of five places” and in Fazang’s judgement 「別舉五處可知」 tr. “the separate raising of five places may be understood” 〔T35n1733 0414c27〕, each of the two follows the text he is commenting on.

Sentence Six The Clause of Bounds 〔the most important divergence in this sense〕

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279All the various kinds of speech of all sentient beings are none of them apart from the Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma. Why is this? Because the true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma.T10n0279 0276a03
Buddhabhadra T278All the dharmas of speech of all sentient beings are wholly embraced by the sound of the wheel of the Dharma. Why is this? Because no sound at all is apart from the sound of the wheel of the Dharma.T09n0278 0627c23

Where the divergences lie: the reason given in the eighty is 「言音實相即法輪」 tr. “the true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma” — established with respect to the true character; the reason given in the sixty is 「一切音聲不離法輪音聲」 tr. “no sound at all is apart from the sound of the wheel of the Dharma” 〔T09n0278 0627c24〕 — established with respect to the mutual embracing of sounds. Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, attaches this sentence to the fifth gate, the gate of bounds 〔T35n1733 0414c28〕, while Chengguan, on the eighty-fascicle text, attaches it as the second passage of the matching of the simile, 「正合前文入一切語」 tr. “properly matching the earlier text on entering into all speech” 〔T35n1735 0884a04〕. Recorded as it stands, without forcing an explanation.

Sentence Seven The Place Where It Is Born

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279The Tathāgata, following the measureless differences in the workings of the minds of all sentient beings and in what they desire and delight in, issues sundry sounds and turns the wheel of the Dharma.T10n0279 0276a08
Buddhabhadra T278The Tathāgata, with sounds matching the workings of the mind of all sentient beings thought after thought, turns the wheel of the Dharma for all sentient beings.T09n0278 0627c27

Where the divergences lie: the eighty brings out the item 「欲樂無量差別」 tr. “the measureless differences in what they desire and delight in”, the sixty the item 「念念心心行等」 tr. “the workings of the mind thought after thought, and the like”.

Sentence Eight The Samādhi and the Issuing of Sounds

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279The Tathāgata, the Arhat, the Perfectly Awakened One, has a samādhi named: Ultimate Unobstructedness and Fearlessness; and having entered this samādhi, from each single body and each single mouth in which he accomplishes right awakening he issues words and sounds equal in number to all sentient beings, and within each single sound all sounds are complete, each of them different, and so he turns the wheel of the Dharma, causing all sentient beings to give rise to joy.T10n0279 0276a10
Buddhabhadra T278The Tathāgata, the worthy of offerings, the rightly and fully awakened one, has a samādhi named Ultimate Unobstructedness and Fearlessness; the Tathāgata rightly receives the samādhi and turns the wheel of the Dharma. Having entered this samādhi, the Tathāgata brings forth sounds equal in number to all sentient beings, and within each single sound he again brings forth sounds equal in number to all sentient beings, and turns the wheel of the Dharma, causing sentient beings all to rejoice greatly.T09n0278 0627c29

Where the divergences lie: the eighty separately brings out the item 「於成正覺一一身、一一口」 tr. “from each single body and each single mouth in which he accomplishes right awakening” 〔T10n0279 0276a11〕, attaching it to the seventh sense before it, the accomplishing of right awakening; the sixty lacks this item and instead brings out the sentence 「如來正受三昧,而轉法輪」 tr. “the Tathāgata rightly receives the samādhi and turns the wheel of the Dharma” 〔T09n0278 0628a01〕.

Sentence Nine The Concluding Exhortation on Gain and Loss

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279One who is able to know the turning of the wheel of the Dharma in this way — know that this person is one who accords with all the Buddha’s Dharma; one who does not know in this way does not accord.T10n0279 0276a13
Buddhabhadra T278Sons of the Buddha! If one knows the turning of the wheel of the Dharma in this way, know that this person accords with the whole household of the buddhas; one who does not know in this way does not accord with the households of the tathāgatas.T09n0278 0628a04

Where the divergences lie: the eighty has 「隨順一切佛法」 tr. “accords with all the Buddha’s Dharma”, the sixty 「隨順一切佛家」 tr. “accords with the whole household of the buddhas” and 「不隨順諸如來家」 tr. “does not accord with the households of the tathāgatas” — a divergence between Dharma and household, the sixty speaking with respect to the lineage and the eighty with respect to the Dharma.

Sentence Ten The First Verse in Repetition and the Number of the Verses

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279The Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma has nothing that is turned; in the three times there is neither arising nor anything got; just as letters have no time when they are told to the end, so too is the wheel of the Dharma of him of the ten powers.T10n0279 0276a19
Buddhabhadra T278The Tathāgata turns the wheel of the Dharma; in the three times there is nowhere it does not reach; what is turned has nothing that is turned, and sought for, it cannot be got.T09n0278 0628a09

Where the divergences lie: (a) The verses of the eighty are five verses of seven graphs to the line; the verses of the sixty are ten verses of five graphs to the line. (b) As for the judgement of the number of verses: Chengguan, on the eighty-fascicle text, has 「偈有五頌」 tr. “the verses are five” 〔T35n1735 0884a12〕, and Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, has 「頌中十偈」 tr. “within the verses there are ten” 〔T35n1733 0415a12〕 — the number of verses differs in the two texts themselves, and each of the two commentaries follows the text it comments on, and so it is recorded in full without adjudication. (c) The first verse of the sixty has 「三世無不至」 tr. “in the three times there is nowhere it does not reach” 〔T09n0278 0628a09〕 〔spoken with respect to pervading〕, while the first lines of the eighty have 「三世無起亦無得」 tr. “in the three times there is neither arising nor anything got” 〔T10n0279 0276a19〕 〔spoken with respect to there being nothing〕.

Sentence Eleven The Last Verse

WitnessVerbatim, renderedSource
Śikṣānanda T279Letters come out neither from within nor from without; they are not destroyed and have no accumulation; and yet for the sake of sentient beings he turns the wheel of the Dharma — such mastery is exceedingly marvelous.T10n0279 0276a27
Buddhabhadra T278It is like all the letters: neither within nor without, without outflow and not to be exhausted, and likewise without accumulation.T09n0278 0628a25

Where the divergences lie: the eighty gathers into one verse both the simile of letters and the mastery of the turning of the wheel; the sixty divides this into two verses, and at the end brings out further 「十力亦如是,轉清淨法輪,無漏不可盡,諸佛大神力」 tr. “he of the ten powers is like this too: he turns the pure wheel of the Dharma, without outflow and not to be exhausted — the great spiritual power of the buddhas” 〔T09n0278 0628a27〕.


V. Scriptural Grounds of Sectarian Doctrine (the doctrinal eye)

(1) Turning with nothing arisen and nothing turned — tallying with the real in the very midst of the phenomenal — the first of the nine clauses: 「以心自在力無起無轉而轉法輪,知一切法恒無起故」 tr. “by the power of the mind’s mastery, with nothing arisen and nothing turned, he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are constantly unarisen” 〔T10n0279 0275c15〕. Chengguan gathers the whole of the turning of the wheel of the Dharma into five gates, and then lets fall this judgement:

「夫轉法輪不過此五,今皆即事契真。」 tr. “Now, the turning of the wheel of the Dharma goes no further than these five; here all of them tally with the real in the very midst of the phenomenal.” 〔T35n1735 0883c10〕

The Chao, explaining this sentence, says: 「揀實異權,名數則同,意旨懸隔。」 tr. “It sorts out the real as differing from the provisional: the names and numbers are the same, but the intent lies far apart.” 〔T36n1736 0629b25〕 — the names and numbers are the same as in the other teachings, but what is pointed at is not the same; this is the eye by which this sense is assigned its place.

(2) The five substances of the wheel of the Dharma and how the five clauses of this scripture gather them in — the Chao, running through the Great Vehicle as a whole, sets up five substances:

「體總有五:一輪自性,謂擇法覺支、正見正知等,通見修無學,或取八聖道具輪輻轂輞故。」 tr. “The substances are five in all: first, the wheel’s own nature, namely the awakening-factor of discerning dharmas, right view and right knowing and the rest, running through seeing, cultivation, and the stage beyond learning; or else the eightfold noble path is taken, since it has rim, spokes, and hub complete.” 〔T36n1736 0629a25〕 「二者法輪因,謂能生後聖道諸教聞思修等」 tr. “Second, the cause of the wheel of the Dharma, namely the teachings that are able to give birth to the noble path that follows, together with hearing, reflecting, and cultivating and the rest” 〔T36n1736 0629a29〕 「三法輪眷屬,聖道助伴五蘊諸法。四法輪境,聖道所緣四諦、因緣、三性等理。五法輪果,謂因道所證菩提涅槃無為等果。」 tr. “Third, the retinue of the wheel of the Dharma, the dharmas of the five aggregates that are the helpers and companions of the noble path. Fourth, the object of the wheel of the Dharma, the principles that the noble path takes as its objects — the four truths, causes and conditions, the three natures, and the rest. Fifth, the fruit of the wheel of the Dharma, namely the fruits realized by the path that is the cause — awakening, nirvāṇa, the unconditioned, and the rest.” 〔T36n1736 0629b02〕

And he gathers these in by the five clauses of the present scripture:

「今經五句即攝此五,一能轉心即是眷屬、二即自性、三即第五、四即第二、五即第四。」 tr. “The five clauses of the present scripture gather in these five: the first, the mind that turns, is the retinue; the second is the own nature; the third is the fifth; the fourth is the second; the fifth is the fourth.” 〔T36n1736 0629b06〕

And again he gathers them in by the five aspects of the Yuqie shidi lun: 「今經五句即攝彼五,一即第四令他信解、二即第二、三即第三、四即第五、五即第一。」 tr. “The five clauses of the present scripture gather in those five: the first is the fourth, causing others to have faith and understanding; the second is the second; the third is the third; the fourth is the fifth; the fifth is the first.” 〔T36n1736 0629b16〕

(3) The true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma — 「一切眾生種種語言,皆悉不離如來法輪。何以故?言音實相即法輪故。」 tr. “All the various kinds of speech of all sentient beings are none of them apart from the Tathāgata’s wheel of the Dharma. Why is this? Because the true character of speech-sound is itself the wheel of the Dharma.” 〔T10n0279 0276a03〕 — the bounds of the wheel of the Dharma are not confined to the Buddha’s voice. Chengguan, matching this passage, says:

「以上法中但云入一切言故,今明入餘法則觸類皆法輪,豈同三乘但用佛聲為輪等耶?」 tr. “Since above, in the statement of the Dharma, it said only that it enters into all speech, here it is made clear that it enters into the remaining dharmas as well, so that whatever kind one comes upon is the wheel of the Dharma. How should this be the same as the three vehicles, which use only the Buddha’s voice as the wheel and so forth?” 〔T35n1735 0884a02〕

Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, sets up the fifth gate, the gate of bounds, and lists three judgements side by side 〔recorded without adjudication · see item six〕.

(4) The wheel is pure from the first — 「究竟寂滅而轉法輪,知一切法涅槃性故」 tr. “in utter quiescence he turns the wheel of the Dharma, because he knows that all dharmas are of the nature of nirvāṇa” 〔T10n0279 0275c20〕. Chengguan: 「是知其輪本來常清淨也。」 tr. “From this one knows that this wheel is from the first constantly pure.” 〔T35n1735 0883c22〕 Fazang, under the sixty-fascicle text’s clause 「皆悉清淨」 tr. “all of them pure”, cites the scripture in witness: 「其輪本來常清淨」 tr. “this wheel is from the first constantly pure” 〔T35n1733 0414c11〕 — that the substance of the wheel is pure from the first and only then is there a turning is the scriptural ground for ‘turning and yet no turning’ under the gate of nature-arising.

(5) The wheel arises from the vows — the sixty-fascicle text lists first 「一切願」 tr. “all the vows”, which Fazang explains as 「是法輪所依」 tr. “that on which the wheel of the Dharma depends” 〔T35n1733 0414c06〕; this is of one bone with what the fifth sense of this chapter makes clear, that the ocean of wisdom arises from the great vows of former times — the bestowing of the virtue of the fruit is likewise the old vows now in operation 〔recorded without adjudication〕.

(6) The samādhi as that on which the speaking of the Dharma depends — 「如來、應、正等覺有三昧,名:究竟無礙無畏,入此三昧已」 tr. “the Tathāgata, the Arhat, the Perfectly Awakened One, has a samādhi named: Ultimate Unobstructedness and Fearlessness; and having entered this samādhi” 〔T10n0279 0276a10〕. Fazang: 「謂欲轉法輪入此三昧者,是所依門故也。」 tr. “That is, his entering this samādhi when he would turn the wheel of the Dharma is because it is the gate on which it depends.” 〔T35n1733 0415a06〕 Chengguan: 「得究竟者,唯佛有故。」 tr. “That it is gained ultimately is because only a buddha has it.” 〔T35n1735 0884a11〕 — that eloquence which is fearless is ultimate in a buddha alone, and here lie the bounds between the Buddha’s speaking of the Dharma and that of the two vehicles.


VI. Divergent Interpretations of the Commentators (the ancient worthies · with their schools marked)

Chengguan, Huayan jing shu T35n1735 (following the eighty-fascicle text phrase by phrase · the principal witness)

How the nine clauses are opened and folded:

「文有九句,減數十也,皆先標、後釋。前五顯體性寂寥,後四辨相用深廣。」 tr. “The text has nine clauses, one short of the number ten; each first sets up and afterward explains. The first five reveal that the substance and nature are still and vacant; the latter four discern that the characteristic and function are profound and vast.” 〔T35n1735 0883c07〕

The explanation of the first five, one by one:

「一能轉心者,由知法無起故,正轉法時不起心念,言我轉授前人,名心自在,如是方為真能轉也。」 tr. “First, the mind that turns: because he knows that dharmas do not arise, at the very time of turning the Dharma he does not raise the thought that says ‘I am turning it over and transmitting it to the person before me’; this is named the mind’s mastery, and only thus is it truly a turning.” 〔T35n1735 0883c11〕 「二所轉體者,即示勸證,名為三轉。此三名輪者,摧障惱故。言離邊者,若有惑可摧,未離於常;無惑可摧,寧免於斷?今永離斷常等邊,方為真能斷所應斷,知與證修亦然。」 tr. “Second, the substance that is turned: that is, demonstrating, exhorting, and witnessing, which are named the three turnings. That these three are named a wheel is because they crush obstruction and vexation. As for the words ‘apart from the extremes’: if there were an affliction that could be crushed, one would not yet be apart from permanence; and if there were no affliction that could be crushed, how would one escape annihilation? Now, being forever apart from the extremes of annihilation and permanence and the rest, only then is it truly a cutting off of what ought to be cut off; and so it is with knowing, with realizing, and with cultivating.” 〔T35n1735 0883c13〕 「三所得果者,由斷惑故,得離欲際;由證性空,本無可離,斯際亦遣。」 tr. “Third, the fruit that is gained: because he cuts off affliction, he gains the limit that is freedom from desire; and because he realizes that the nature is empty, there was from the first nothing to be free from, and so this limit too is dispelled.” 〔T35n1735 0883c17〕 「四能詮教者,理假言詮,今了本寂,滅不可說故,則終日言而未曾言也。」 tr. “Fourth, the teaching that expresses: principle borrows words to be expressed; but now that he understands that it is from the first still, and that the quiescent cannot be spoken, then he speaks the whole day long and has never spoken.” 〔T35n1735 0883c19〕 「五所顯理,謂即寂滅。今了性淨涅槃,法本不然,今則無滅,方為究竟之滅。」 tr. “Fifth, the principle that is revealed, namely quiescence itself. Now, understanding the nirvāṇa that is pure by nature, dharmas were from the first not aflame, and so now there is no extinguishing; and only this is the utter extinguishing.” 〔T35n1735 0883c21〕

The explanation of the latter four, one by one:

「後四相用深廣中,一觸言皆輪廣也;二即用而寂深也。下二亦深亦廣。三一即多而無主;四即橫竪而恒虛,謂橫則無遺,無所不轉故。竪則無盡,窮未來故。而不著內外,則深廣無涯矣。」 tr. “Among the latter four, whose characteristic and function are profound and vast: the first, that whatever speech one touches upon is the wheel, is the vast; the second, that in the very midst of function it is still, is the profound. The two below are both profound and vast. The third is that the one is the many and yet without a master; the fourth is that in the very midst of the crosswise and the upright it is ever void — crosswise it is without omission, since there is nothing it does not turn; upright it is without exhaustion, since it goes to the end of the future. And as he is attached neither within nor without, the profound and the vast are without shore.” 〔T35n1735 0883c23〕

The revealing of whence it comes:

「明因所起輪。物既為力不同,教須適宜差別。」 tr. “It makes clear the wheel that arises from the cause. Since beings differ in the force that shapes them, the teaching must be fitted to them and differ accordingly.” 〔T35n1735 0884a08〕 「說法所依之定名者,無礙辯才無所怯畏。得究竟者,唯佛有故。」 tr. “As for the name of the concentration on which the speaking of the Dharma depends: eloquence unobstructed, and nothing timid or feared. That it is gained ultimately is because only a buddha has it.” 〔T35n1735 0884a10〕 「及第三總結,文並可知。」 tr. “And as for the third, the general conclusion, the text may be understood throughout.” 〔T35n1735 0884a12〕

Chengguan, Yanyi chao T36n1736

The general explanation under three gates: 「今略以三門分別:一釋名、二出體、三轉相。」 tr. “Here, in brief, it is discerned under three gates: first, explaining the name; second, setting out the substance; third, the characteristics of the turning.” 〔T36n1736 0629a07〕

The four senses of ‘turning’:

「轉謂動也、顯也、運也、起也。動宣言教,顯揚妙理,運聖道於聲前,起真智於言後,圓摧障惱,名轉法輪。」 tr. “Turning means setting in motion, revealing, conveying, and arousing. Setting the spoken teaching in motion, revealing and raising up the wondrous principle, conveying the noble path ahead of the sound, arousing true wisdom after the words, and crushing obstruction and vexation completely — this is named turning the wheel of the Dharma.” 〔T36n1736 0629a18〕

That the setting out of the substance and the characteristics of the turning resemble each other: 「然上出體與其轉相皆大乘意,細尋二門多有相似,或應為一。」 tr. “Yet the setting out of the substance above and the characteristics of the turning are both of them the sense of the Great Vehicle; searching the two gates closely, they have much in common, and perhaps they ought to be made one.” 〔T36n1736 0629b21〕

Fazang, Tanxuan ji T35n1733 (the commentary on the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata in the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka)

The ten senses that make clear substance and characteristic:

「初中略以十義明其體相:一一切願者,是法輪所依;二一切法者,是所轉之法;三轉無所轉者,會相明體;四本無所起者,稱性辨體;五三轉圓滿者,德相圓滿,謂示相、勸知、引證為三也」 tr. “Within the first, its substance and characteristic are made clear in brief under ten senses: first, ‘all the vows’ is that on which the wheel of the Dharma depends; second, ‘all dharmas’ is the Dharma that is turned; third, ‘turning with nothing turned’ gathers the characteristics so as to make clear the substance; fourth, ‘from the first nothing arisen’ discerns the substance in accord with the nature; fifth, ‘the three turnings complete’ is the completeness of the characteristics of virtue, that is, demonstrating the characteristics, exhorting to knowing, and adducing witness make the three” 〔T35n1733 0414c05〕 「七悉能等者,離障故、破見故、業用故;八離欲等者,離無所離故;九一切諸法等者,離言故;十一切法等者,離相故。」 tr. “Seventh, ‘able wholly’ and the rest: because it is apart from obstruction, because it breaks views, because of its working. Eighth, ‘apart from desire’ and the rest: because it is apart with nothing to be apart from. Ninth, ‘all dharmas’ and the rest: because it is apart from words. Tenth, ‘all dharmas’ and the rest: because it is apart from characteristics.” 〔T35n1733 0414c11〕

The four senses of the gate of the profound and the vast:

「明深廣門,於中有四義,各有標、釋。初一廣、次一深、後二亦深亦廣。」 tr. “It makes clear the gate of the profound and the vast; within it there are four senses, each having a setting up and an explaining. The first is the vast, the next is the profound, and the latter two are both profound and vast.” 〔T35n1733 0414c15〕 「二中先標甚深,實性故者釋成深義。三中先標深廣,佛轉法輪無主故者釋成。以各從緣成,無自體故,同為一性,悉是法輪。」 tr. “In the second, he first sets up ‘exceedingly profound’, and the words ‘because of the real nature’ explain and establish the sense of the profound. In the third, he first sets up ‘profound and vast’, and the words ‘because the Buddha’s turning of the wheel of the Dharma has no master’ explain and establish it. Since each is formed from conditions and has no substance of its own, they are alike of one nature, and all of them are the wheel of the Dharma.” 〔T35n1733 0414c19〕 「四中先標,無流故深也、無盡故廣也,內外無所有者釋成也。」 tr. “In the fourth, he first sets up: because it is without outflow it is profound, and because it is without exhaustion it is vast; and the words ‘within and without there is nothing that is’ explain and establish it.” 〔T35n1733 0414c22〕

The three judgements of the gate of bounds:

「若小乘,一說五音是法輪聲,餘問阿難天雨等皆非法輪攝。若三乘中,佛一切音聲等皆是法輪,餘即皆非。若一乘,一切眾生言音等亦入法輪,約用皆得成法輪故。」 tr. “If it be the lesser vehicle, then on one account the five sounds are the sound of the wheel of the Dharma, and the rest — such as asking Ānanda whether the sky is raining — are none of them embraced by the wheel of the Dharma. If it be within the three vehicles, then all the Buddha’s sounds and the like are the wheel of the Dharma, and the rest are none of them so. If it be the one vehicle, then the speech-sounds of all sentient beings and the like also enter the wheel of the Dharma, since with respect to function all of them are able to become the wheel of the Dharma.” 〔T35n1733 0414c29〕

The gate of giving birth and the gate of the benefit of knowing:

「先通辨,謂欲轉法輪入此三昧者,是所依門故也。無礙者,是辯才也。無畏者,言無怯懼。」 tr. “First a general discerning: that is, his entering this samādhi when he would turn the wheel of the Dharma is because it is the gate on which it depends. ‘Unobstructed’ is eloquence. ‘Fearless’ means without timidity or dread.” 〔T35n1733 0415a06〕 「正顯出生多音,釋成總中眾生念心等音也。悉令眾生等者,稱根授法故令喜也。」 tr. “It properly reveals the giving birth to many sounds, explaining and establishing the sounds that match the thoughts and minds of sentient beings in the general statement. As for ‘causing sentient beings all’ and the rest: because the Dharma is bestowed to match their faculties, they are made to rejoice.” 〔T35n1733 0415a09〕 「明如上而知順大菩提,不爾即非。」 tr. “It makes clear that to know as above is to accord with the great awakening, and that not to do so is not to accord.” 〔T35n1733 0415a11〕

The outline of the verses:

「頌中十偈:初一頌初體相門、次一頌第三無盡門、次二頌半頌第四無住門、次三頌半頌第六出生門、末後二頌却頌第二深廣門。」 tr. “Within the verses there are ten: the first one praises the first gate, of substance and characteristic; the next one praises the third gate, of inexhaustibility; the next two and a half praise the fourth gate, of non-abiding; the next three and a half praise the sixth gate, of giving birth; and the last two turn back and praise the second gate, of the profound and the vast.” 〔T35n1733 0415a12〕

  • Supplementary verbatim record of Fazang’s words cited in the exposition: 「如來音聲,於一切世間文字語言無不至故,皆轉法輪也。」 tr. “Because the Tathāgata’s voice reaches without exception every letter and language of the world, all of them turn the wheel of the Dharma.” 〔T35n1733 0414c18–19〕 (the basis of the exposition’s sentence on the reason)

Li Tongxuan, Xin Huayan jing lun T36n1739

No outline division belonging specifically to this sense is found (on examination no independent citation is found) — 〔not found〕.

Recorded without adjudication: as for the outline of this sense, Chengguan, on the eighty-fascicle text, makes a division of two, ‘revealing the substance and function · revealing whence it comes’, and beneath it opens nine clauses 〔the first five · the latter four〕, while Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, makes seven gates 〔substance and characteristic · the profound and vast · inexhaustibility · non-abiding · bounds · giving birth · the benefit of knowing〕 and beneath them opens ten senses; and the numbers, nine clauses and ten senses, are attached to the fact that the text of the scripture is itself opened and folded differently in the two versions (the sixty separately brings out the two items 「一切願」 tr. “all the vows” and 「皆悉清淨」 tr. “all of them pure”). As for the judgement of bounds, Fazang lists three accounts, of the lesser vehicle · the three vehicles · the one vehicle, while Chengguan, on the eighty-fascicle text, sets his question by placing 「觸類皆法輪」 tr. “whatever kind one comes upon is the wheel of the Dharma” over against 「三乘但用佛聲為輪」 tr. “the three vehicles, which use only the Buddha’s voice as the wheel” 〔T35n1735 0884a03〕. As for the judgement of the number of verses, Chengguan, following the eighty-fascicle text, makes five verses, and Fazang, following the sixty-fascicle text, makes ten. Which of the nine clauses and the ten senses is the proper outline, which of the three judgements of bounds is to be adopted, and how the number of verses is opened and folded in the two texts — the ancients held divergent accounts; these are recorded, and not adjudicated.


VII. Cross-Reading and Lineage

  • The Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata in the sixty-fascicle Avataṃsaka 〔T09n0278 0627c05–0628a28〕: the whole of the parallel translation of this sense; the structure of the scene is entirely the same (the raising of the question · the clauses of substance and nature · the simile of the inexhaustibility of letters · the simile of the universal entry of the chapters of letters · the clause of bounds · the place where it is born · the samādhi · the concluding exhortation on gain and loss · the verses in repetition), and the collation sentence by sentence is given in item four.
  • The fifth sense of this chapter, ‘the realm of the appearance’: there it is made clear that the ocean of wisdom arises from the great vows of former times; here it is made clear that the substance of the wheel is pure and that nothing arises and nothing is turned. Fazang, on the sixty-fascicle text, labels both senses alike with the name 「性起」 tr. “nature-arising” 〔T35n1733 0414c02〕 — the realm and the wheel come forth alike from the one gate of nature-arising 〔recorded without adjudication〕.
  • The seventh sense of this chapter, ‘the accomplishing of right awakening’: this sense’s words 「於成正覺一一身、一一口,各出一切眾生數等言音」 tr. “from each single body and each single mouth in which he accomplishes right awakening he issues words and sounds equal in number to all sentient beings” 〔T10n0279 0276a11〕 take up directly the fruit of the sense before it; and Chengguan’s statement of the reason for its coming, 「得大菩提,理必轉授」 tr. “having gained the great awakening, in principle he must of necessity turn it over and transmit it” 〔T35n1735 0883c04〕, attaches it precisely there.
  • Fazang, Huayan yisheng jiaoyi fenqi zhang T45n1866: 「性起」 tr. “nature-arising” appears six times 〔0485b11 · 0486a05 · 0489c06 · 0498c10 · 0507a10–11〕, all of them broad citations of what the Chapter on the Nature-Arising says; this sense, the turning of the wheel of the Dharma, has no passage taken up specifically — 〔not found〕.
  • The Dasheng qixin lun T32n1666: examined for 「性起」 tr. “nature-arising”, 0 hits — 〔not found〕.
  • T45n1868 · T45n1883: examined for 「轉法輪」 tr. “the turning of the wheel of the Dharma”, 0 hits each — 〔not found〕.
  • The treatises of the lineage (the Cheng weishi lun T31n1585 · the She dasheng lun T31n1594 · the Yuqie shidi lun T30n1579): no text directly taking up this sense has been found; only that Chengguan’s Chao cites the five aspects of the Yuqie, fascicle ninety-five, so as to gather in the five clauses of the present scripture 〔T36n1736 0629b11〕 — this is a bridge cited by an ancient worthy, not a lineage belonging to this sense itself. It is marked as lacking, as the facts stand, and nothing from elsewhere is put in its place.

VIII. Edition Location Register

  • Śikṣānanda T279 (the base text): chapter thirty-seven, the Chapter on the Appearance of the Tathāgata, the eighth sense, the turning of the wheel of the Dharma, beginning 〔T10n0279 0275c14〕 and ending 〔up to just before 0276a29〕 (the seventh assembly, the return to the palace of Universal Light · fascicle fifty-two). The order of the passages: the raising of the question 〔0275c14〕 · the nine clauses of substance and function 〔0275c15–0275c24〕 · the simile of the inexhaustibility of letters 〔0275c25〕 · the simile of universal entry without abiding, with the matching of the Dharma 〔0275c28–0276a02〕 · the clause of bounds 〔0276a03〕 · the concluding exhortation 〔0276a05〕 · the raising of the question on whence it comes 〔0276a06〕 · sounds issued according to capacity 〔0276a08〕 · sounds issued from samādhi 〔0276a10〕 · the concluding exhortation on gain and loss 〔0276a13〕 · the general conclusion 〔0276a15〕 · the five verses in repetition 〔0276a17–0276a27〕.
  • Buddhabhadra T278 (the Jin translation, the principal witness for collation): the Chapter on the Nature-Arising of the Jewel-King Tathāgata, chapter thirty-two, beginning 〔T09n0278 0627c05〕 and ending 〔0628a28〕 (fascicle thirty-five, ‘part four’, the boundary falling after the verses 〔0628b02–0628b05〕). The raising of the question 0627c05 · the clauses of substance and nature 0627c06 · the simile of the inexhaustibility of letters 0627c15 · the simile of the universal entry of the chapters of letters 0627c18 · the clause of bounds 0627c23 · the gate of the place where it is born 0627c25 · the samādhi 0627c29 · the concluding exhortation on gain and loss 0628a04 · the conclusion 0628a06 · the verses in repetition begin 0628a08 (the first verse 0628a09 · the last two verses 0628a25 · 0628a27).
  • Chengguan, Shu T35n1735: eighth, making clear the turning of the wheel of the Dharma in the appearance, beginning 0883c04 and ending just before 0884a14. The reason for its coming 0883c04 · the prose in three parts 0883c05 · the explanation of the characteristics in two 0883c05 · the three parts, the Dharma stated, the simile, and the concluding exhortation 0883c06 · the general judgement of the nine clauses 0883c08 · the names of the first five 0883c09 · tallying with the real in the very midst of the phenomenal 0883c10 · the mind that turns 0883c11 · the three turnings and being apart from the extremes 0883c13 · the fruit that is gained 0883c17 · the teaching that expresses 0883c19 · the principle that is revealed 0883c21 · the characteristic and function of the latter four 0883c23 · the outline of the two similes 0883c29 · the two within the matching 0884a01 · the proper matching of the entering into all speech 0884a04 · that they are passed over and not given a simile 0884a05 · the concluding exhortation and the revealing of whence it comes 0884a06 · the cause from which the wheel arises 0884a07 · the wheel that arises from the cause 0884a08 · the name of the concentration 0884a11 · the concluding of gain and loss and the general conclusion 0884a11 · the verses are five 0884a12.
  • Chengguan, Chao T36n1736: the section on the eighth sense begins 0629a06. The three gates 0629a07 · the Brahmā wheel 0629a09 · explaining the name 0629a10 · the four senses of the wheel 0629a11 · the general explanation of ‘turning’ 0629a16 · the four senses of turning 0629a18 · the five in setting out the substance 0629a24 · the wheel’s own nature 0629a25 · the cause of the wheel of the Dharma 0629a29 · the retinue, the object, and the fruit 0629b02 · the five clauses gathering in the five substances 0629b06 · the five aspects of the Yuqie 0629b11 · the five clauses gathering in those five 0629b16 · the resemblance of the setting out of the substance and the characteristics of the turning 0629b21 · sorting out the real as differing from the provisional 0629b25 · the turning that demonstrates the characteristics 0629b27. 〔Recorded〕 What has been collated word for word in this section reaches only to the opening of the section; the text after that has not been collated, which is not to say that there is none.
  • Fazang, Tanxuan ji T35n1733: eighth, making clear the turning of the wheel of the Dharma as nature-arising, beginning 0414c01 and ending just before 0415a16. The outline name and the three parts 0414c01 · the seven gates 0414c03 · the ten senses 0414c05 · the Brahmā wheel and the purity of the nature 0414c09 · the seventh through the tenth senses 0414c11 · the gate of the profound and the vast 0414c15 · the explanation of the four senses of the profound and the vast 0414c19 · having no substance of its own and being alike of one nature 0414c21 · the fourth sense 0414c22 · the gate of inexhaustibility 0414c23 · the gate of non-abiding 0414c25 · the gate of bounds 0414c28 · the three judgements 0414c29 · the gate of giving birth 0415a04 · the general discerning, and unobstructedness and fearlessness 0415a06 · the giving birth to many sounds 0415a09 · the gate of the benefit of knowing 0415a11 · the outline of the verses 0415a12.
  • Li Tongxuan, Lun T36n1739: an outline division belonging specifically to this sense 〔not found〕.
  • Variant readings: within the range of T279 covered by this unit, 〔0275c14〕–〔0276a28〕, the Taishō base text carries 2 collation notes, recorded one by one without adjudication (base reading 【大】|variant readings of other witnesses, several witnesses separated by /): 〔0275c18〕見【大】|無此字【聖】 · 〔0276a21〕覺【大】|學【聖】. The interlinear notes (phonetic and collation glosses) were stripped and recorded at the level of the original-text layer.
  • A further note upon the variant readings: 1 CBETA emendation (not counted among the Taishō collation notes listed above): 〔0275c21〕以一【CB】|一【大】/以一【明】.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing. The full statement of AI's role across the 指月 project is maintained at methodology.

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0