金光明最勝王經 重顯空性品
《重顯空性品》沒有用一句『因為空,所以什麼都沒有』來回答。它逐層觀察身心世界,品末又記大眾願捨輪迴、正修出離。
佛陀先說,這個身體如同空聚。眼只能見色,耳只能聞聲,鼻嗅香,舌嘗味,身受觸,意了法;六根各緣自己的境界,彼此並不相知。心識雖到處奔馳,也要依根緣境,才能了別諸事。
作用都在,卻找不到一位藏在其中、獨立控制一切的主人。身由地水火風共同構成,四大同居一處又彼此相違;心識依身造業,身又隨業受形,最後仍歸疾病、敗壞與屍林。
經文接著問:既然諸法如此,為什麼還執著實有一個我與眾生?
接著,它把觀察推到無明與輪迴。無明的自性本來是無,卻藉眾緣和合而有;行、識、名色、六處、觸、受、愛、取、有、生與老死,也在因緣中相續。空不是抹去緣起,而是不再把緣起之法抓成固定實體。
可是,本品的轉折還在後面。說完五蘊宅空,經文立刻說斷煩惱、求菩提;開甘露城門,把甘露施給眾生;擊法鼓、吹法螺、燃明燈、降法雨,在生死海中救濟迷者。
再往後,是供養諸佛、堅持禁戒、施捨眼耳手足與財寶、遍修諸度、圓滿十地而成正覺。空沒有使這些行動消失。它所鬆開的,是對一個常住主宰、固定身心與實有諸法的執取;它所留下的,是依緣而起、可以轉向的行。
品末,大眾聞空之後,也沒有退場。他們了達四大、五蘊、六根與六境,便願捨輪迴、正修出離,深心慶喜,如說奉持。
所以,如果一切皆空,為什麼還要修行?
因為空不是把苦與行都說成不存在。它讓人看見:繫縛沒有一個不可改變的主人,輪迴沒有一個永恆不動的自體。經在說一切依緣而起的同一品中,也直接寫下斷惑、慈悲、布施與出離。
這一品從『身如空聚』走到『如說奉持』。空性落在生命裡時,不是少做一件事,而是少執一個我;不是離開眾生,而是不再用實有的我抓住眾生、所行與所得。不執有我,大眾仍願捨輪迴、正修出離、如說奉持。
“Reaffirming Emptiness” does not answer with the sentence, “Because everything is empty, nothing exists.” It examines the world of body and mind layer by layer, and at the end records that the assembly vowed to leave saṃsāra and correctly cultivate release.
The Buddha first says that this body is like an empty aggregate. Eyes can see only forms, ears can hear only sounds, the nose smells odors, the tongue tastes flavors, the body receives contacts, and the mind cognizes dharmas. Each of the six faculties takes its own object as a condition, and they do not know one another. Though mind-consciousness races everywhere, it too must depend upon faculties and take objects as conditions before it can distinguish things.
All these functions occur, yet no master can be found hidden within and independently controlling everything. The body is jointly formed from earth, water, fire, and wind; the four great elements dwell together while conflicting with one another. Mind-consciousness depends upon the body to produce karma, and the body in turn takes form according to karma, yet it finally comes to illness, decay, and the corpse grove.
The sūtra then asks: since dharmas are like this, why still cling to the real existence of a self and sentient beings?
It next extends the contemplation to ignorance and saṃsāra. The self-nature of ignorance is originally absent, yet through many conditions it exists in conjunction. Formations, consciousness, name-and-form, the six bases, contact, feeling, craving, clinging, existence, birth, and aging-and-death also continue through causes and conditions. Emptiness does not erase dependent arising. It means no longer grasping dependently arisen dharmas as fixed substances.
But the chapter’s turn still lies ahead. After teaching that the dwelling of the five aggregates is empty, the sūtra immediately speaks of severing afflictions and seeking awakening; opening the gate of the city of nectar and giving nectar to sentient beings; sounding the Dharma-drum, blowing the Dharma-conch, lighting the bright lamp, sending down Dharma-rain, and rescuing the deluded in the ocean of birth and death.
It then speaks of honoring all buddhas, steadfastly maintaining the precepts, giving eyes, ears, hands, feet, and treasures, cultivating all the perfections, completing the ten grounds, and realizing right awakening. Emptiness does not make these actions disappear. What it loosens is grasping at a permanent ruler, a fixed body and mind, and substantially existent dharmas. What remains is conduct that arises through conditions and can turn in another direction.
At the end of the chapter, the assembly does not withdraw after hearing emptiness. Having understood the four great elements, five aggregates, six faculties, and six objects, they vow to leave saṃsāra, correctly cultivate release, rejoice deeply, and uphold the teaching as spoken.
So if everything is empty, why practice?
Because emptiness does not declare that suffering and conduct do not exist. It lets one see that binding has no unchangeable master and saṃsāra has no eternally immovable substance. In the very chapter that teaches that everything arises through conditions, the sūtra also directly records the severing of afflictions, compassion, giving, and release.
This chapter moves from “the body is like an empty aggregate” to “uphold the teaching as spoken.” When emptiness enters life, it does not mean doing one thing less, but grasping one self less. It does not mean leaving sentient beings, but no longer using a substantially existent self to seize beings, actions, and attainments. Without grasping a self, the assembly still vows to leave saṃsāra, correctly cultivate release, and uphold the teaching as spoken.
唐義淨譯《金光明最勝王經》卷五〈重顯空性品第九〉· 大正藏 T16n0665〔起 T16 0424a20〕。段/行首〔T16 …〕=大正藏頁·欄·行錨。
〔T16 0424a20〕爾時,世尊說此呪已,為欲利益菩薩摩訶薩人天大眾,令得悟解甚深真實第一義故,重明空性而說頌曰:
「我已於餘甚深經,廣說真空微妙法;
今復於此經王內,略說空法不思議。
於諸廣大甚深法,有情無智不能解;
故我於斯重敷演,令於空法得開悟。
大悲哀愍有情故,以善方便勝因緣;
我今於此大眾中,演說令彼明空義。
當知此身如空聚,六賊依止不相知;
六塵諸賊別依根,各不相知亦如是。
眼根常觀於色處,耳根聽聲不斷絕,
鼻根恒嗅於香境,舌根鎮甞於美味,
身根受於輕軟觸,意根了法不知厭,
此等六根隨事起,各於自境生分別。
識如幻化非真實,依止根處妄貪求;
如人奔走空聚中,六識依根亦如是。
心遍馳求隨處轉,託根緣境了諸事;
常愛色聲香味觸,於法尋思無暫停。
隨緣遍行於六根,如鳥飛空無障礙;
藉此諸根作依處,方能了別於外境。
此身無知無作者,體不堅固託緣成;
皆從虛妄分別生,譬如機關由業轉。
地水火風共成身,隨彼因緣招異果;
同在一處相違害,如四毒蛇居一篋。
此四大蛇性各異,雖居一處有昇沈;
或上或下遍於身,斯等終歸於滅法。
於此四種毒蛇中,地水二蛇多沈下;
風火二蛇性輕舉,由此乖違眾病生。
心識依止於此身,造作種種善惡業;
當往人天三惡趣,隨其業力受身形。
遭諸疾病身死後,大小便利悉盈流;
膿爛蟲蛆不可樂,棄在屍林如朽木。
汝等當觀法如是,云何執有我眾生?
一切諸法盡無常,悉從無明緣力起。
彼諸大種咸虛妄,本非實有體無生;
故說大種性皆空,知此浮虛非實有。
無明自性本是無,藉眾緣力和合有;
於一切時失正慧,故我說彼為無明。
行識為緣有名色,六處及觸受隨生;
愛取有緣生老死,憂悲苦惱恒隨逐。
眾苦惡業常纏迫,生死輪迴無息時;
本來非有體是空,由不如理生分別。
我斷一切諸煩惱,常以正智現前行;
了五蘊宅悉皆空,求證菩提真實處。
我開甘露大城門,示現甘露微妙器;
既得甘露真實味,常以甘露施群生。
我擊最勝大法鼓,我吹最勝大法螺,
我然最勝大明燈,我降最勝大法雨。
降伏煩惱諸怨結,建立無上大法幢;
於生死海濟群迷,我當關閉三惡趣。
煩惱熾火燒眾生,無有救護無依止;
清涼甘露充足彼,身心熱惱並皆除。
由是我於無量劫,恭敬供養諸如來;
堅持禁戒趣菩提,求證法身安樂處。
施他眼耳及手足,妻子僮僕心無悋,
財寶七珍莊嚴具,隨來求者咸供給。
忍等諸度皆遍修,十地圓滿成正覺;
故我得稱一切智,無有眾生度量者。
假使三千大千界,盡此土地生長物;
所有叢林諸樹木,稻麻竹葦及枝條。
此等諸物皆伐取,竝悉細末作微塵;
隨處積集量難知,乃至充滿虛空界。
一切十方諸剎土,所有三千大千界;
地土皆悉末為塵,此微塵量不可數。
假使一切眾生智,以此智慧與一人;
如是智者量無邊,容可知彼微塵數。
牟尼世尊一念智,令彼智人共度量;
〔T16 0425a01〕 於多俱胝劫數中,不能算知其少分。」
時諸大眾聞佛說此甚深空性,有無量眾生,悉能了達四大、五蘊體性俱空,六根、六境妄生繫縛,願捨輪迴,正修出離,深心慶喜,如說奉持。
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
底本:唐義淨譯《金光明最勝王經》卷五〈重顯空性品第九〉。白話依原文逐段、逐頌今譯;三十三頌逐頌分列,述而不作。
說完金勝陀羅尼,再為大眾重明空性
這時,世尊說完前品的陀羅尼,為了利益諸大菩薩與人天大眾,使他們悟解甚深而真實的第一義,所以再次闡明空性,說出以下偈頌。
前三頌:為何在此略說而重說空義
一、『我已經在其他甚深經典中,廣泛說明真空的微妙法義;如今又在這部經王之中,簡要說明不可思議的空法。』
二、『面對廣大而甚深的法,有情若缺少智慧便不能理解;所以我在這裡再次敷演,使他們對空法得到開悟。』
三、『因為大悲憐愍一切有情,我以善巧方便作殊勝因緣;如今就在這大眾之中演說,使他們明白空義。』
十二頌:身、六根、六境、心識與四大
四、『應當知道,這個身體如同聚沫一般虛假不實,稱為空聚;六根如賊依止其中,彼此並不相知。六境也各如賊,分別依著六根;它們彼此不相知,也同樣如此。』
五、『眼根常常觀看色境,耳根持續聽取聲音;鼻根恆常嗅聞香境,舌根經常品嘗美味。』
六、『身根領受輕柔細軟的接觸,意根了知諸法而不知厭足;這六根各隨構成它們的大種、依根而起的識等事緣生起,各自在自己的境界上生起分別。』
七、『識如幻化,並不真實,卻依著諸根虛妄貪求;如同有人在空聚中奔走,六識依止六根也是如此。』
八、『心到處奔馳追求,隨所在之處而轉;它託依諸根、攀緣境界,了別種種事情。它時常愛著色、聲、香、味、觸,對法境尋思,沒有片刻停息。』
九、『心識隨著因緣遍行於六根,如鳥飛在空中而沒有障礙;它藉這些根作為依止之處,然後才能了別外在境界。』
十、『這個身體本身沒有知覺,也沒有一個造作者;它的體質並不堅固,依託眾緣而成。它從虛妄分別生起,如同機關木人由業力帶動運轉。』
十一、『地、水、火、風共同構成這個身體,隨各種因緣招感不同果報;四大同住一處卻彼此違害,如同四條毒蛇同居在一只箱篋中。』
十二、『這四條大蛇的性質各不相同,雖然同居一處,卻有上升與下沈;它們或上或下遍滿全身,而這一切最後都歸於消滅。』
十三、『在這四條毒蛇之中,地蛇與水蛇多向下沈,風蛇與火蛇性質輕而上舉;由於四大彼此乖違,各種疾病便由此生起。』
十四、『心識依止這個身體,造作種種善業與惡業;將往生於人趣、天趣或三惡趣,隨著自己的業力領受相應身形。』
十五、『這個身體遭受疾病而死去之後,大小便全都流出;膿爛、蟲蛆,毫無可樂之處,最後被丟在屍林中,如同一段朽木。』
五頌:從我執轉觀無常、無明與十二支
十六、『你們應當觀察諸法就是這樣,為什麼還執著實有一個我與眾生?一切諸法全都無常,都從無明的因緣力量而生起。』
十七、『那些構成身體的大種全都虛妄,它們並非本來就真實自有,也不是自然自生;所以說大種的體性皆空,應知它們如浮漚一般虛浮,並非實有。』
十八、『無明的自性本來是無,卻藉眾多因緣的力量和合而有;由於在一切時候失去正慧,所以我稱它為無明。』
十九、『行是識的因緣,識是名色的因緣,六處、觸與受也依次隨生;愛是取的因緣,取是有的因緣,有是生的因緣,老死又隨著生而來,憂愁、悲傷、痛苦、煩惱恆常相隨。』
二十、『種種痛苦與惡業時常纏縛逼迫,生死輪迴沒有止息之時;它們本來並非實有,體性是空,只因不合正理的思惟而生起分別。』
八頌:斷惑、甘露、法化與諸度
二十一、『我已斷除一切煩惱,時常使正智現前運行;我了知五蘊所成的宅舍全都空寂,求證菩提的真實之處。』
二十二、『我開啟甘露大城之門,示現承受甘露的微妙器皿;既已得到甘露的真實滋味,便時常把甘露布施給一切眾生。』
二十三、『我擊響最殊勝的大法鼓,吹起最殊勝的大法螺;點燃最殊勝的大明燈,降下最殊勝的大法雨。』
二十四、『我降伏煩惱所成的一切怨敵與纏結,建立無上的大法幢;在生死大海中救濟迷失的眾生,並要關閉三條惡趣之路。』
二十五、『煩惱的熾火焚燒眾生,他們無人救護,也無所依止;我以清涼甘露使他們得到滿足,令身體與心中的熱惱全都消除。』
二十六、『因此,我在無量劫中恭敬供養一切如來,堅定持守禁戒而趣向菩提,求證法身安樂之處。』
二十七、『有人來求時,我布施自己的眼、耳、手、足,乃至妻子、僮僕,心中都不吝惜;財寶、七珍與莊嚴器具,也全都隨來求者的需要而供給。』
二十八、『忍辱等各種度行,我全都普遍修習;十地圓滿之後,成就正覺。因此我得以稱為一切智,沒有任何眾生能夠度量。』
末五頌:以十方微塵校量佛陀一念之智
二十九、『假使把一個三千大千世界中,這片大地所生長的一切植物,包括所有叢林、各種樹木、稻、麻、竹、蘆葦與枝條,全都取來。』
三十、『把這些植物全部砍伐,再一一磨碎成微塵;那些微塵到處堆積,數量難以知曉,甚至充滿整個虛空界。』
三十一、『再把十方一切剎土中,所有三千大千世界的大地全都磨成微塵;這些微塵的數量,無法計數。』
三十二、『假使把一切眾生的智慧全都集中交給一個人,又使這樣具有無邊智慧的人多得不可限量,他們或許還能知道那些微塵的數目。』
三十三、『可是,牟尼世尊一念之間的智慧,即使讓那些有智慧的人共同度量,經過許多俱胝劫的時間,也不能算知其中很少的一分。』
大眾聞法、願修而奉持
當時,大眾聽聞佛陀宣說這一甚深空性,有無量眾生都能了達:四大與五蘊的體性全都空寂;六根與六境虛妄生起繫縛。他們願意捨離輪迴,正確修習出離之道,內心深深慶喜,依照佛陀所說受持奉行。
Base text: Yijing’s Tang translation of The Sūtra of Golden Light, the Supreme King, fascicle five, “Reaffirming Emptiness,” Chapter 9. This vernacular rendering follows the original passage by passage and stanza by stanza. All thirty-three stanzas are presented separately; it transmits without adding.
After Teaching the Golden-Victory Dhāraṇī, the Buddha Again Clarifies Emptiness for the Assembly
At that time, after the World-Honored One had spoken the dhāraṇī of the preceding chapter, he wished to benefit the great bodhisattvas and the human and divine assembly and enable them to understand the profound and true ultimate meaning. He therefore again clarified emptiness and spoke the following stanzas.
The First Three Stanzas: Why Emptiness Is Taught Briefly and Taught Again Here
One. “In other profound sūtras I have already explained extensively the subtle meaning of true emptiness. Now, within this king of sūtras, I again explain briefly the inconceivable Dharma of emptiness.”
Two. “When faced with Dharma that is vast and profound, sentient beings who lack wisdom cannot understand it. I therefore expound it again here so that they may awaken to the Dharma of emptiness.”
Three. “Out of great compassion and pity for all sentient beings, I use skillful means to establish superior causes and conditions. I now teach within this great assembly so that they may understand the meaning of emptiness.”
Twelve Stanzas: Body, Six Faculties, Six Objects, Mind-Consciousness, and the Four Great Elements
Four. “Know that this body is false and unreal like a mass of foam and is called an empty aggregate. The six faculties dwell within it like thieves, yet they do not know one another. The six objects are likewise thieves, each assigned to and dependent upon a faculty; they too do not know one another.”
Five. “The eye faculty constantly looks upon forms, and the ear faculty continually hears sounds. The nose faculty always smells odors, and the tongue faculty frequently tastes fine flavors.”
Six. “The body faculty receives light, soft, and delicate contacts, while the mind faculty cognizes dharmas without satiety. These six faculties each arise through the conditions of the great elements that constitute them, the consciousness that arises in dependence upon the faculty, and other supporting factors. Each produces discrimination within its own sphere.”
Seven. “Consciousness is like an illusion and is not real, yet it depends upon the faculties and delusively craves and seeks. Just as a person runs through an empty aggregate, so the six consciousnesses depend upon the six faculties.”
Eight. “Mind races everywhere in pursuit and turns wherever it finds itself. Entrusting itself to the faculties and taking objects as conditions, it distinguishes all kinds of things. It constantly clings to forms, sounds, odors, tastes, and contacts, and conceptualizes dharmas without a moment’s pause.”
Nine. “Mind-consciousness follows conditions and ranges throughout the six faculties like a bird flying unobstructed through the sky. Only by relying upon these faculties as its supports can it distinguish external objects.”
Ten. “This body itself has no awareness and no agent. Its substance is unstable and is formed in dependence upon many conditions. It arises from delusive discrimination like a mechanical wooden figure set in motion by karmic power.”
Eleven. “Earth, water, fire, and wind together constitute this body, bringing different results according to various conditions. Although the four great elements dwell together in one place, they harm and oppose one another like four venomous snakes sharing a single box.”
Twelve. “The natures of these four great snakes differ. Although they dwell together in one place, some rise and others sink. Moving upward and downward, they pervade the whole body, but all of them finally come to cessation.”
Thirteen. “Among these four venomous snakes, the earth-snake and water-snake mostly sink, while the wind-snake and fire-snake are light in nature and rise. Because the four great elements conflict with one another, all kinds of illness arise from them.”
Fourteen. “Mind-consciousness depends upon this body and produces all kinds of good and bad karma. It will be born among humans, devas, or the three evil destinies and receive a responsive body-form corresponding to its own karmic power.”
Fifteen. “After this body suffers illness and dies, excrement and urine all flow out. Pus, decay, worms, and maggots leave nothing delightful. At last it is discarded in a corpse grove like a piece of rotten wood.”
Five Stanzas: From Attachment to Self toward Contemplation of Impermanence, Ignorance, and the Twelve Links
Sixteen. “You should contemplate all dharmas in this way. Why still cling to the real existence of a self and sentient beings? All dharmas are entirely impermanent and arise through the conditioned power of ignorance.”
Seventeen. “The great elements that constitute the body are all false. They were not originally real and self-existent, nor do they arise spontaneously of themselves. The natures of the great elements are therefore said to be empty. Know them to be floating and insubstantial like bubbles, not truly existent.”
Eighteen. “The self-nature of ignorance is originally absent, yet through the power of many conditions it exists in conjunction. Because right wisdom is lost at all times, I call it ignorance.”
Nineteen. “Formations are the condition for consciousness, and consciousness is the condition for name-and-form. The six bases, contact, and feeling then arise in sequence. Craving is the condition for clinging, clinging the condition for existence, and existence the condition for birth. Aging and death follow birth, while sorrow, lamentation, suffering, and distress constantly accompany them.”
Twenty. “All kinds of suffering and bad karma constantly bind, press, and torment beings, and the cycle of birth and death has no moment of rest. Yet these were originally not truly existent: their substance is empty, and discrimination arises only through improper reasoning.”
Eight Stanzas: Severing Afflictions, Nectar, Dharma Activity, and the Perfections
Twenty-one. “I have severed all afflictions and constantly bring right wisdom into present operation. I know the dwelling made of the five aggregates to be entirely empty and quiescent and seek realization of the true place of awakening.”
Twenty-two. “I open the gate of the great city of nectar and reveal the subtle vessel that receives it. Having attained the true taste of nectar, I constantly give that nectar to all sentient beings.”
Twenty-three. “I sound the most excellent great Dharma-drum and blow the most excellent great Dharma-conch. I light the most excellent great bright lamp and send down the most excellent great Dharma-rain.”
Twenty-four. “I subdue every enemy and bond made of afflictions and establish the unsurpassed great Dharma-banner. I rescue beings lost in the great ocean of birth and death and close the roads to the three evil destinies.”
Twenty-five. “The blazing fire of afflictions burns sentient beings. No one rescues or protects them, and they have nowhere to depend. With cooling nectar I bring them satisfaction, removing all the feverish torment in body and mind.”
Twenty-six. “For this reason, throughout immeasurable eons I reverently honor all tathāgatas, steadfastly maintain the precepts, advance toward awakening, and seek realization of the blissful place of the dharma-body.”
Twenty-seven. “When someone comes to ask, I give my eyes, ears, hands, and feet, even wife, children, and servants, without stinginess in my heart. Treasures, the seven precious things, and objects of adornment are all supplied according to the petitioner’s need.”
Twenty-eight. “I cultivate throughout the various perfections, including patience. When the ten grounds are complete, I accomplish right awakening. I therefore possess all-knowing knowledge, which no sentient being can measure.”
The Final Five Stanzas: Measuring a Single Thought of the Buddha’s Wisdom against Particles throughout the Ten Directions
Twenty-nine. “Suppose one were to take all the vegetation growing from the earth in one trichiliocosm—all groves, every kind of tree, rice, hemp, bamboo, reeds, and branches.”
Thirty. “Suppose all this vegetation were cut down and each piece pulverized into minute particles. Those particles would accumulate everywhere in numbers difficult to know, filling even the whole realm of empty space.”
Thirty-one. “Then suppose all the earth in every trichiliocosm throughout all lands in the ten directions were likewise pulverized into minute particles. The number of these particles could not be counted.”
Thirty-two. “Suppose the wisdom of all sentient beings were gathered together and given to one person, and suppose that people possessing such boundless wisdom were themselves immeasurable in number. They might perhaps know the number of those particles.”
Thirty-three. “Yet even if these wise people together attempted to measure the wisdom in a single thought of the Muni, they could not calculate even its smallest part throughout many koṭis of eons.”
The Assembly Hears the Dharma, Vows to Cultivate, and Upholds It
At that time, after the assembly heard the Buddha teach this profound emptiness, immeasurable sentient beings understood that the natures of the four great elements and five aggregates are entirely empty and quiescent and that the six faculties and six objects delusively produce binding. They vowed to leave the cycle of rebirth, correctly cultivated the path of release, rejoiced deeply at heart, and received, upheld, and practiced what the Buddha had taught.
前一品剛說完金勝陀羅尼:稱名、禮敬、誦持、懺悔、發願,直到願遂之後仍要常持不忘。到了這一品,佛陀沒有離開修行另談一套抽象理論。經文第一句便說『世尊說此呪已』,隨即為菩薩與人天大眾重明空性,要使他們悟解甚深真實第一義。
問題也就在這裡出現。如果身、根、境、識、四大、五蘊與緣起都被說成空,前品所說的持誦與懺悔還有什麼位置?若連我與眾生都不可執,後半品為什麼又說斷煩惱、救眾生、修諸度、滿十地而成正覺?
本品沒有用一句定義回答。它以三十三頌按次第展開:先說為何重說空;再逐層觀身心如何依緣運作;繼而追問我與眾生之執,展開無明與輪迴;最後由空觀走向斷惑、利生、布施、諸度與佛智。偈序並未停在說空,後段仍直說斷惑、利生、諸度與佛智。
以下先依經文自己的次第而讀。空義如何被古德判為不同科目,留到末節再以唯識之眼旁照;鏡非經,不讓鏡中的名目先蓋住經文的行進。
為何還要『重顯』:略說不是淺說
偈頌前三首先交代說法因緣。佛陀說,祂已在其他甚深經中廣說真空微妙法,如今在這部經王之中再作略說。『略』在這裡不是把空義說得淺薄,而是相對於餘經的廣說,在此重新提挈一條可進入的路。
第二首把所面對的困難說得直接:廣大甚深之法,有情缺少智慧便不能理解。因此要再度敷演,使人對空法得到開悟。第三首又把重說的起點放在大悲與善巧方便上。佛陀不是為展示一個難懂概念而說空,而是因有情不能解,故以大悲哀愍而說。
這三頌先定下全品的語氣。空義雖深,說空的動作卻朝向有情;它不是把不能理解的人排除在外,而是為他們重說。後面每一次拆解身心,都仍在這個大悲起點之內。
身如空聚:六根都在作用,卻找不到一位總主
經文先從身體下手:『此身如空聚』。但它沒有接著說身體什麼都不能做。相反,偈頌逐根列出功能:眼觀色,耳聽聲,鼻嗅香,舌嘗味,身受輕軟觸,意根了法。六根各於自境生分別,心識又託根緣境而了諸事。
這份細密列舉很要緊。所謂空,不是抹去觀看、聽聞、嗅嘗、觸受與了知;這些作用都在發生。經要人看的是:六根與六境各依其位,彼此不相知;沒有一根能代替另一根,也沒有一境自行成為其餘諸境。
接著,經把能了別的識也放進觀察。識如幻化,依著根處虛妄貪求;心到處奔馳,愛著色聲香味觸,又在法境上尋思不息。它隨緣遍行六根,如鳥飛空,卻仍須藉諸根作依處,方能了別外境。
這一段中,根、境與識都不是一位藏在身內、獨立發號施令的主人。根有各自所緣,識要依根緣境,境又在所緣中被了別。作用沒有被取消,獨立主宰卻無處可得。『空聚』所打開的,不是一片死寂,而是一組彼此依待、各有條件的身心活動。
經又說身無知、無作者,體不堅固而託緣成,譬如機關由業轉。這個譬喻把『有人在裡面操作整個身體』的想像鬆開:機關能動,卻依組合與動力而動;身心能行,也依眾緣與業而轉。
四蛇同篋:同住一身,不等於和成一個常體
身體再被分作地、水、火、風。四大共同成身,卻各有不同性質;它們同居一處而彼此違害,像四條毒蛇同住一只箱篋。地水多向下沈,風火性輕上舉;沈與舉的乖違遍於身中,眾病由此生起,而四大最後都歸於滅。
這裡沒有把四大說成一個永遠和諧的整體。『共同成身』與『同處相違』在同一組偈頌中並列:身確實由它們組成,組成卻不使差異消失,也不把眾緣凝成一個不變的自體。
心識依止這樣的身,造作種種善惡業,再隨業力往人、天與三惡趣受取身形。經沒有因身空而抹去業,也沒有因業報而另立一個常住的作者。它同時說身由緣成、由業轉,又說無知、無作者;受報的連續與主宰的不可得,並不被壓成二選一。
身死以後的描寫更不留餘地:大小便利流出,膿爛蟲蛆,棄在屍林如朽木。前面眼耳鼻舌等作用曾如此活躍,到此卻顯出身體必壞、不淨、不可久保。經不以委婉語遮掩這一轉折,因為對身的可樂想,也正要在具體敗壞中被看見。
『我』從哪裡來:由反問進入無明與緣起
身、根、境、識、四大、業與死後不淨逐層說完,偈頌忽然發問:既然諸法如此,為什麼還執著實有一個我與眾生?這不是先提出一個抽象的無我命題,再拿身體作例子;而是先把身心的依待與敗壞攤開,反問隨之出現。
反問之後,視野從身體轉向諸法與緣起。一切諸法無常,從無明的因緣力量而起;諸大種虛妄,本非實有,其體無生。經又說無明的自性本是無,卻藉眾緣力和合而有;因為失去正慧,所以稱為無明。
這兩句必須一起聽。若只抓『本是無』,容易把空讀成全無;若只抓『和合有』,又會把依緣而有誤作自體實有。經把兩面放在同一頌:本無自性,依眾緣而有。空性不是把緣起現象趕走,而是阻止人把緣起之法執成自立不變的實體。
接下來,行、識、名色、六處、觸、受、愛、取、有、生與老死依次展開,憂悲苦惱隨逐不捨。生死輪迴看似沒有止息,經卻又說它本來非有、體是空,是由不如理的分別而生。
輪迴之苦並未被輕描淡寫。眾苦與惡業仍然纏迫,憂悲苦惱仍然相隨;要鬆開的,是把這條因緣鏈執成一個固定、獨立、由某個常我主宰的實體。經文說它依不如理的分別而生,又在品末直接寫下大眾願捨輪迴、正修出離。
空觀沒有停在拆解:它轉向斷惑與求證
到了『我斷一切諸煩惱』,偈頌的聲音明顯轉變。前面主要觀身心諸法如何空、如何依緣;從這裡開始,佛陀以第一人稱說斷煩惱、令正智現前,了知五蘊宅空,求證菩提真實之處。
經沒有停在『五蘊皆空』,下一頌立刻開啟甘露大城之門,示現微妙之器;得甘露真實味之後,還要把甘露施給群生。所證不留在自己,所得之味轉成布施。
再往下,法鼓、法螺、明燈、法雨一一出現。鼓要擊,螺要吹,燈要燃,雨要降;每一個意象都是向外發生的動作。接著又說降伏煩惱怨結、建立法幢、在生死海救濟群迷、關閉三惡趣。空觀沒有使世界離場,反而把行動推向受苦眾生。
甘露意象再次出現時,面對的是被煩惱火燒、無救無護、無所依止的眾生。清涼甘露充足他們,令身心熱惱並除。前面死後不淨的身體觀與這裡救護熱惱的利生行,都在同一品中;觀身不可樂,不等於對受苦之身失去悲心。
空不取消布施:眼耳手足與十地都在經中
偈頌隨後回顧無量劫的修行:恭敬供養諸如來,堅持禁戒而趣菩提,求證法身安樂之處。這不是一個忽然完成的結果,而是以無量劫作時間尺度。
布施也沒有被縮成抽象善意。經逐項列眼、耳、手、足,乃至妻子、僮僕;又列財寶、七珍與莊嚴器具,隨來求者而供給。這些句子自有古代經典的施捨語境,本品先如實保留其列舉,不在經義段另添現代裁判,也不把具體項目抹成一句『捨得』。
布施之後還有忍等諸度,並說十地圓滿、成就正覺、一切智不可度量。由此回看,經沒有把空性與修行相對置:觀身心與緣起之空,經文隨即續寫斷惑、正智、供佛、持戒、布施、諸度與成佛。
這也回答了開頭的疑問:既然無我,誰來修行?經沒有另立一個常住修行者作答案;它繼續敘說正智斷惑、甘露利生與長劫修諸度。沒有固定主宰,不等於沒有行;不執行者為實體,也不等於善惡、苦樂、繫縛與出離全無差別。
微塵可數,一念之智仍不可量
最後五頌把尺度推到十方世界。先取一個三千大千世界中的叢林、樹木、稻麻、竹葦與枝條,全部砍伐、細末成塵,直到充滿虛空;再把十方所有三千大千世界的大地也末為微塵。
然後,假使把一切眾生的智慧集中給一人,又使這樣的智者無量無邊,他們或許能知道那些微塵之數。可是一同度量牟尼世尊一念之智,經多俱胝劫,仍不能算知少分。
校量的落點很明確:不是泛說一切都不可知,而是說眾智合一、歷劫共量,仍不知佛陀一念智的少分。前面一路從根、境、識觀察到緣起,又從空觀修到一切智;到末尾,經以微塵之數顯出所成佛智不可量。
聞空之後,大眾不是退場,而是奉持
品末不以偈頌停止。大眾聽聞甚深空性,有無量眾生了達四大、五蘊體性俱空,也了達六根、六境妄生繫縛。他們接著發願捨離輪迴,正修出離,深心慶喜,如說奉持。
這個結尾把全品的方向鎖得很清楚。聞空的結果不是『既然皆空,什麼也不必做』;經文記下的是了達、發願、正修、慶喜、奉持。空義落在生命中,便成為離繫與修行的起點。
下一品隨即有人請問甚深理的修行之法。於是,本品由前一品的持呪而來,又把大眾送到依空修行之問。本品在前後兩段實踐之間重明空性:經先問為何執有我與眾生,後續仍列正智、布施、諸度與出離,各在其位(懺悔屬前品受持次第,不在本品之後續)。
以唯識之眼,再看空性
上來只依〈重顯空性品〉自身的偈序而說。這一系譯註另以慈恩慧沼《金光明最勝王經疏》作旁照之鏡——鏡非經;以下三性、二執與八空的名目,都是古德判釋,不冒充佛陀在本品逐項自說。
慧沼先以三義解空性:一是「一者空即是性,即遍計所執我法二種」(T39n1788 0272c07);二是「二者空之性即真如,是空之真性,因空所顯,故云空性,非體性空」(0272c07–c09);三是「三者依他亦名空性,名無生性故」(0272c09–c10)。其後用一句收緊界線:「此即依他,但空二執,不空依圓故。」(0272c10–c11)依這面鏡看,空不是把依他起與圓成實一併抹除,而是空去遍計所執的人、法二執;觀空也不是執著一個『全無』。
分科上,慧沼把初十二頌判為內空、外空、內外空:根為所依,境為所緣,識又依根緣境。他說:「根藉識取境,識無根不有。境因心變,境離心無。」(0274a14–a15)所以空聚不是只拆色身,也同時檢視根、境、識如何相待而立。半頌『汝等當觀』既判畢竟空,又保留結前無我之讀;無明與十二支段判無際空,兩讀與兩層都不刪。
到了『我斷一切』,慧沼判無散空;『我開甘露』判本性空,而總科原作自性空;法鼓以下則判一切法空。其空觀於是由二執的遣除,走到不捨生死、不捨涅槃,再到甘露、四種法化、諸度與一切智。這是唯識疏家把空觀與利生行相連的讀法,不回填到前面經義段中。
其他古德另有不同分科。智顗依曇無讖本把正說分作生法二空之境與生法二空之觀,又說空品導成懺悔破惡、讚歎生善;吉藏把本品分為略說之意、正說空理、觀空利益勸修,又以五非常門展開身段;知禮在玄義層說:「唯此經〈空品〉明於圓空,即先觀生空、次觀法空。」(T39n1784 0032c09–c10)慧沼的八空、智顗的境觀、吉藏的空理與勸修、知禮的圓空,各有本位。
以這面鏡回望,本品這一張力便清楚了:身、根、境、識都不可執為自立實體,無明與輪迴也依緣而起;但空去二執並不空掉依緣的行與圓成的實。以此鏡並看,空聚與甘露施生、布施諸度、正覺並不互相刪除。此品承衍前品的受持,又把空觀交給下一品的修行之問;鏡使二執與三性之界線可見,經仍居中央。
The preceding chapter has just finished teaching the Golden-Victory Dhāraṇī: reciting names, venerating, reciting and upholding, repenting, and making a vow, followed by constant, unforgetting upholding even after the wish has been fulfilled. In this chapter, the Buddha does not leave practice behind to discuss a separate abstract theory. The first sentence of the sūtra says, “after the World-Honored One had spoken this formula,” and immediately reaffirms emptiness for the bodhisattvas and the human and divine assembly so that they may understand the profound and true ultimate meaning.
This is precisely where the question arises. If body, faculties, objects, consciousness, the four great elements, five aggregates, and dependent arising are all said to be empty, what place remains for the recitation and repentance taught in the preceding chapter? If neither self nor sentient beings may be grasped, why does the latter half of this chapter still speak of severing afflictions, rescuing beings, cultivating the perfections, completing the ten grounds, and realizing right awakening?
The chapter does not answer with a single definition. It unfolds in thirty-three stanzas: first explaining why emptiness is taught again; then contemplating layer by layer how body and mind operate through conditions; next questioning attachment to self and sentient beings and unfolding ignorance and saṃsāra; and finally moving from contemplation of emptiness into severing afflictions, benefiting beings, giving, the perfections, and buddha-wisdom. The sequence of the stanzas does not stop at teaching emptiness. Its latter part still directly teaches the severing of afflictions, the benefiting of beings, the perfections, and buddha-wisdom.
The reading below first follows the sūtra’s own sequence. How ancient masters assign the meaning of emptiness to different categories is reserved for the final section, where the eye of consciousness-only provides collateral illumination. The mirror is not the sūtra: its classifications must not cover over the movement of the sūtra before that movement has even begun.
Why “Reaffirm” Emptiness? A Brief Teaching Is Not a Shallow Teaching
The first three stanzas explain the causes and conditions for the teaching. The Buddha says that he has extensively taught the subtle Dharma of true emptiness in other profound sūtras and now teaches it briefly again within this king of sūtras. “Brief” does not mean that the meaning of emptiness is made shallow. Relative to the extensive teaching in other sūtras, it gathers up anew a path by which one can enter here.
The second stanza states the difficulty directly: sentient beings who lack wisdom cannot understand vast and profound Dharma. It must therefore be expounded again so that they may awaken to the Dharma of emptiness. The third stanza places the starting point of this repetition in great compassion and skillful means. The Buddha teaches emptiness not to display an obscure concept, but because sentient beings cannot understand and are therefore compassionately regarded.
These three stanzas establish the tone of the whole chapter. Although the meaning of emptiness is profound, the act of teaching emptiness is directed toward sentient beings. It does not exclude those who cannot understand; it teaches them again. Every later dismantling of body and mind still remains within this compassionate point of departure.
The Body Is an Empty Aggregate: All Six Faculties Function, Yet No Single Ruler Can Be Found
The sūtra begins with the body: “this body is like an empty aggregate.” It does not then say that the body can do nothing. On the contrary, the stanzas list the functions of the faculties one by one: eyes see forms, ears hear sounds, the nose smells odors, the tongue tastes flavors, the body receives contact, and the mind cognizes dharmas. Each of the six faculties discriminates within its own sphere, while mind-consciousness in turn entrusts itself to the faculties, takes objects as conditions, and cognizes things.
This detailed enumeration matters. Emptiness does not erase seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, touching, and knowing; all these functions occur. What the sūtra asks one to see is that the six faculties and six objects each occupy their own position and remain mutually unaware. No single faculty can take the place of another, and no single object independently becomes all the other objects.
The sūtra next brings the consciousness that discriminates into the contemplation. Consciousness is like an illusion and depends upon its faculty-locations in delusively craving and seeking. Mind races everywhere, clinging to forms, sounds, odors, tastes, and contacts while conceptualizing dharmas without pause. It follows conditions and ranges throughout the six faculties like a bird flying through the sky, yet it must still rely on the faculties as its supports before it can distinguish external objects.
Within this passage, faculties, objects, and consciousness are not a master hidden inside the body and issuing commands independently. Each faculty has its own object, consciousness must depend upon faculties and take objects as conditions, and objects are distinguished within the process of their being taken as conditions. Function is not abolished, but an independent ruler cannot be found. What the “empty aggregate” opens is not a dead stillness, but an array of bodily and mental activities that depend upon one another and each require conditions.
The sūtra further says that the body is not-knowing, has no agent, is unstable in substance, and is formed through conditions, like a mechanism turned by karma. This simile loosens the picture of “someone inside operating the entire body”: a mechanism can move, but it moves through an assembly of parts and a driving power. Body and mind can act, but they too turn through many conditions and karma.
Four Snakes in One Box: Sharing One Body Does Not Make an Eternal Substance
The body is then divided into earth, water, fire, and wind. The four great elements together constitute the body, yet each has a different nature. They dwell together while harming and opposing one another like four venomous snakes in a single box. Earth and water mostly sink, while wind and fire are light and rise. The conflict between sinking and lifting pervades the body; illnesses arise from it, and all four elements finally come to cessation.
The four great elements are not described as an eternally harmonious whole. “Together constitute the body” and “dwell together yet conflict” appear in the same group of stanzas. The body is indeed formed from them, but composition does not make their differences disappear or condense many conditions into an unchanging substance.
Mind-consciousness depends upon such a body, produces all kinds of good and bad karma, and then takes on bodily form among humans, devas, or the three evil destinies according to karmic power. The sūtra does not erase karma because the body is empty, nor does it establish a permanent agent because karmic results occur. It says at once that the body is formed through conditions and turned by karma, yet is unknowing and has no agent. Continuity in receiving results and the unfindability of a ruler are not forced into an either-or choice.
The account of the body after death is more uncompromising still: excrement and urine flow out, pus and rot appear with worms and maggots, and the body is discarded in a corpse grove like rotten wood. The faculties of eye, ear, nose, and tongue were active before, but the body here is shown as necessarily decaying, impure, and impossible to preserve. The sūtra does not conceal the transition with euphemism, because the perception of the body as delightful must also be seen through its concrete decomposition.
Where Does “Self” Come From? The Question Leads into Ignorance and Dependent Arising
After body, faculties, objects, consciousness, the four great elements, karma, and impurity after death have been unfolded layer by layer, the stanza suddenly asks: since dharmas are like this, why still cling to the real existence of a self and sentient beings? Rather than first proposing an abstract thesis of no-self and then using the body as an example, it first lays open the dependencies and decay of body and mind; the question follows from what has been shown.
After the question, the field of vision turns from the body toward dharmas and dependent arising. All dharmas are impermanent and arise through the conditioned power of ignorance. The great elements are false and originally not truly existent; their substance is unarisen. The sūtra further says that the self-nature of ignorance is originally absent, yet through the power of many conditions it exists in conjunction; because right wisdom has been lost, it is called ignorance.
Both sides of these statements must be heard together. If one grasps only “originally absent,” it is easy to read emptiness as utter nonexistence. If one grasps only “exists in conjunction,” one may mistake conditioned existence for inherent substantial existence. The sūtra places both in the same stanza: absent in self-nature, existent through many conditions. Emptiness does not drive dependently arisen appearances away; it prevents dependently arisen dharmas from being grasped as independent and unchanging entities.
Formations, consciousness, name-and-form, the six bases, contact, feeling, craving, clinging, existence, birth, and aging-and-death next unfold in sequence, while sorrow, lamentation, suffering, and distress follow without release. The cycle of birth and death seems to have no pause, yet the sūtra again says that it was originally not existent, that its substance is empty, and that it arises through discrimination based on improper reasoning.
The suffering of saṃsāra is not treated lightly. Sufferings and bad karma still bind and oppress; sorrow, lamentation, suffering, and distress still follow. What must be loosened is the grasping of this causal chain as a fixed, independent substance ruled by a permanent self. The sūtra says that it arises through improper discrimination, then directly records at the end of the chapter that the assembly vowed to leave saṃsāra and correctly cultivate release.
Contemplation of Emptiness Does Not Stop at Dismantling: It Turns toward Severance and Realization
At “I have severed all afflictions,” the voice of the stanzas changes clearly. Earlier passages principally contemplated how dharmas of body and mind are empty and arise through conditions. From this point, the Buddha speaks in the first person of severing afflictions, bringing right wisdom into the present, knowing the dwelling of the five aggregates to be empty, and seeking realization of the true place of awakening.
The sūtra does not stop at “the five aggregates are empty.” The very next stanza opens the gate of the great city of nectar and reveals a subtle vessel. After attaining the true taste of nectar, one must give the nectar to the multitude of beings. What is realized does not remain with oneself; the taste obtained becomes a gift.
The Dharma-drum, Dharma-conch, bright lamp, and Dharma-rain then appear one by one. The drum must be sounded, the conch blown, the lamp lit, and the rain sent down: every image is an action directed outward. The text next speaks of subduing enemies and bonds of affliction, establishing the Dharma-banner, rescuing the deluded in the ocean of birth and death, and closing the three evil destinies. Contemplation of emptiness does not cause the world to leave the stage. It presses action toward suffering beings.
When the image of nectar appears again, it faces beings burned by the fire of afflictions, without rescue or protection and with nowhere to depend. Cooling nectar fills them and removes the feverish torment of body and mind. Contemplation of the body’s impurity after death and compassionate action that protects suffering bodies both occur in this one chapter. Seeing the body as not delightful does not mean losing compassion for bodies in pain.
Emptiness Does Not Cancel Giving: Eyes, Ears, Hands, Feet, and the Ten Grounds Are All in the Sūtra
The stanzas then look back across cultivation throughout immeasurable eons: reverently honoring tathāgatas, steadfastly maintaining the precepts, advancing toward awakening, and seeking realization of the blissful place of the dharma-body. This is not an outcome accomplished all at once; its scale of time is immeasurable eons.
Nor is giving compressed into an abstract good intention. The sūtra lists eyes, ears, hands, and feet one by one, even wife, children, and servants; it also lists treasures, the seven precious things, and objects of adornment, supplying them according to those who come to ask. These phrases have their own context of giving within ancient Buddhist scriptures. This chapter first preserves the enumeration faithfully, neither adding a modern adjudication within the exposition of the sūtra’s meaning nor erasing the concrete items into the single word “letting go.”
After giving come the various perfections, including patience, followed by the completion of the ten grounds, the realization of right awakening, and all-knowing knowledge beyond measure. Looking back from this point, the sūtra has not set emptiness against cultivation. After contemplating the emptiness of body, mind, and dependent arising, its own text continues directly through severing afflictions, right wisdom, honoring buddhas, ethical discipline, giving, the perfections, and buddhahood.
This also answers the opening question: if there is no self, who practices? The sūtra does not answer by establishing another permanent practitioner. It continues to narrate the severing of afflictions through right wisdom, the benefiting of beings through nectar, and the cultivation of the perfections over many eons. The absence of a fixed ruler does not mean the absence of action; not grasping the practitioner as a substance does not make good and bad, suffering and ease, binding and release entirely indistinguishable.
Particles Might Be Counted, Yet the Wisdom of One Thought Remains Immeasurable
The final five stanzas extend the scale to worlds throughout the ten directions. They first take the groves, trees, rice, hemp, bamboo, reeds, and branches of one trichiliocosm, cut them all down, and reduce them to fine particles until empty space is filled. They then reduce to particles the earth of every trichiliocosm throughout the ten directions.
Next, suppose the wisdom of all sentient beings were gathered into one person and beings of such wisdom were themselves limitless and boundless. They might know the number of those particles. Yet even if they together measured a single thought of the wisdom of the Muni, they still could not calculate its smallest part throughout many koṭis of eons.
The point of the comparison is precise. It does not claim vaguely that everything is unknowable. It says that even if all wisdom were gathered into one and the wise calculated together throughout eons, they still would not know the smallest part of the Buddha’s wisdom in a single thought. The chapter has moved from examining faculties, objects, and consciousness through dependent arising and then from contemplation of emptiness through cultivation toward all-knowing knowledge. At its end, the number of particles reveals the immeasurability of the buddha-wisdom accomplished.
After Hearing Emptiness, the Assembly Does Not Withdraw but Upholds
The chapter does not stop when its stanzas end. After the assembly hears profound emptiness, immeasurable sentient beings understand that the natures of the four great elements and five aggregates are empty, and that the six faculties and six objects delusively produce binding. They then vow to leave saṃsāra, correctly cultivate release, rejoice deeply at heart, and uphold the teaching as spoken.
This ending fixes the direction of the whole chapter. The result of hearing emptiness is not, “Since everything is empty, nothing need be done.” The sūtra records understanding, vowing, correct cultivation, rejoicing, and upholding. When the meaning of emptiness enters life, it becomes the beginning of release from binding and of cultivation.
In the next chapter someone immediately asks about the method of cultivating according to profound principle. Thus, the present chapter comes from the upholding of the formula in the preceding chapter and sends the assembly forward into the next question of cultivation through emptiness. Between these two passages of practice, it reaffirms emptiness: the sūtra first asks why one grasps a self and sentient beings as existent, then continues to list right wisdom, giving, the perfections, and release, each in its place. Repentance belongs to the upholding sequence of the preceding chapter, not to the subsequent practices listed in this chapter.
Seeing Emptiness Again through the Eye of Consciousness-Only
Everything above has followed only the order of the stanzas in “Reaffirming Emptiness” itself. This line of translation and annotation also takes Huizhao’s Cien Commentary on the Sūtra of Golden Light, the Supreme King as a mirror for collateral illumination—the mirror is not the sūtra. The following names of the three natures, two attachments, and eight emptinesses are all classifications by an ancient master and are not passed off as items spoken one by one by the Buddha in this chapter.
Huizhao first explains emptiness through three meanings. First, 「一者空即是性,即遍計所執我法二種」—“emptiness itself is nature: namely, the two wholly-imagined attachments to person and dharmas” (T39n1788 0272c07). Second, 「二者空之性即真如,是空之真性,因空所顯,故云空性,非體性空」—“the nature of emptiness is suchness, the true nature of emptiness; because it is disclosed through emptiness, it is called emptiness-nature, not because its own essential nature is empty” (0272c07–c09). Third, 「三者依他亦名空性,名無生性故」—“the other-dependent is also called emptiness-nature, because it is called the nature of non-arising” (0272c09–c10). He then tightens the boundary in one sentence: 「此即依他,但空二執,不空依圓故。」—“This is precisely the other-dependent: it empties only the two attachments and does not empty the other-dependent or the perfectly-accomplished” (0272c10–c11). Through this mirror, emptiness does not erase the other-dependent and perfectly-accomplished along with the wholly-imagined. It empties the wholly-imagined attachments to person and dharmas; contemplation of emptiness is not attachment to a total nonexistence.
In his outline, Huizhao assigns the first twelve stanzas to inner emptiness, outer emptiness, and inner-and-outer emptiness: faculties are the bases, objects are what is taken as conditions, and consciousness in turn depends upon faculties and takes objects as conditions. He says, 「根藉識取境,識無根不有。境因心變,境離心無。」—“The faculties rely on consciousness to apprehend objects, and without faculties consciousness does not exist. Objects arise through transformation by mind, and apart from mind no object exists” (0274a14–a15). The empty aggregate therefore does not dismantle only the material body; it also examines how faculty, object, and consciousness stand in mutual dependence. The half stanza “you should contemplate” is assigned to ultimate emptiness while also preserving a reading that it concludes the preceding no-self; the passage on ignorance and the twelve links is assigned to beginningless emptiness. Neither reading nor layer is deleted.
At “I have severed all,” Huizhao assigns non-dispersal emptiness. “I open [the city of] nectar” is assigned to original-nature emptiness, although the general outline says intrinsic-nature emptiness. From the Dharma-drum onward he assigns the emptiness of all dharmas. His contemplation of emptiness therefore moves from the removal of the two attachments toward abandoning neither saṃsāra nor nirvāṇa, and onward to nectar, the four forms of Dharma activity, the perfections, and all-knowing knowledge. This is how the consciousness-only commentator joins the contemplation of emptiness with conduct that benefits beings; it is not written backward into the preceding exposition of the sūtra itself.
Other ancient masters preserve different outlines. Following Dharmakṣema’s recension, Zhiyi divides the direct teaching into the objects and contemplations of the two emptinesses of persons and dharmas, and says that the emptiness chapter guides repentance in destroying evil and praise in producing good. Jizang divides the chapter into the intent of the brief teaching, the direct teaching of the principle of emptiness, and the benefits of contemplating emptiness and exhortation to cultivate; he also unfolds the body passage through five approaches to impermanence. On the profound-meaning level, Zhili says, 「唯此經〈空品〉明於圓空,即先觀生空、次觀法空。」—“Only this sūtra’s ‘Emptiness’ chapter clarifies perfect emptiness: first contemplating person-emptiness, then contemplating dharma-emptiness” (T39n1784 0032c09–c10). Huizhao’s eight emptinesses, Zhiyi’s objects and contemplations, Jizang’s principle of emptiness and exhortation to cultivate, and Zhili’s perfect emptiness each retain their own place and are recorded without adjudicating.
Seen again through this mirror, the chapter’s tension becomes clear. Body, faculties, objects, and consciousness cannot be grasped as self-standing substances, while ignorance and saṃsāra also arise through conditions. Yet emptying the two attachments does not empty conditioned conduct or the reality of the perfectly-accomplished. In this light, the empty aggregate, giving nectar to beings, the perfections of giving, and right awakening do not erase one another. In its Carrying Forward, the chapter carries forward the upholding taught in the preceding chapter and hands contemplation of emptiness to the next chapter’s question about cultivation. The mirror makes the boundary between the two attachments and the three natures visible, while the sūtra remains at the center.
考據Apparatus
全品定位 本品承〈金勝陀羅尼品〉末而起:世尊說呪已,為令菩薩及人天大眾悟解甚深真實第一義,再以三十三頌重明空性;末段記大眾了達四大、五蘊、六根、六境,發願出離而奉持。曇無讖本、寶貴合部與義淨本三本皆有對應品文;慧沼、智顗、吉藏皆有逐文疏;知禮《文句記》另有逐文記,《拾遺記》存玄義層解讀。版本、科判與空義異釋,各守本位,並錄不判。
一、科判定位
本品所在卷五署「大唐三藏沙門義淨奉 制譯」(T16n0665 0422b26,本經第五見)。品題「金光明最勝王經重顯空性品第九」在 0424a19,品身自 0424a20 至 0425a05;0425a06 已是〈依空滿願品第十〉題。
依經文自身可見的動作,全品可分七段:
| 段 | 出處 | 經文所行 |
|---|---|---|
| 一 | 0424a20–a22 | 承前說呪,標所利大眾與所悟第一義,重明空性 |
| 二 | 0424a23–a28 | 說明餘經廣說、此經略說;因有情難解,以大悲方便重演 |
| 三 | 0424a29–b23 | 觀身、六根、六境、心識、四大、業報與死後不淨 |
| 四 | 0424b24–c04 | 反問我與眾生之執,觀諸法無常、無明緣起與十二支輪迴 |
| 五 | 0424c05–c20 | 斷惑求菩提,以甘露、法鼓、法螺、明燈、法雨利生,遍修諸度而成正覺 |
| 六 | 0424c21–0425a01 | 以三千界、十方塵數校量牟尼一念之智 |
| 七 | 0425a02–a05 | 大眾聞空性,了達、願修、慶喜而奉持 |
慧沼先判:「品文分三,一初結集敘說所因、二佛為重陳空義、三時眾獲益慶躍奉行。」(T39n1788 0272c26–c27)偈頌則判:「有三十三頌,分二:初三頌總標說意、次三十頌別為說空。」(T39n1788 0273a05–a06)三十頌依其第一科再分初三空、畢竟空、無際空、無散空、自性空與一切法空;總科稱自性空,逐文又稱本性空,兩字各存其處。
慧沼並存另一總科,先說:「又解:初三頌科解如前、次十七頌正為說空、後」(T39n1788 0273b28–b29),接引經句「我斷一切煩惱」(0273c01),續說:「下明說空所因。且依第一。」(0273c01)。此為同一疏內兩科並存;本編依其明言以第一科敘骨架,也保留第二科,不刪不合。
二、三譯對勘與三家逐文疏並觀
三本皆有此品
| 傳本 | 品題、品界與形制 | 本品所在卷題署 |
|---|---|---|
| 曇無讖本 T16n0663 | 「金光明經空品第五」(0340a07);偈文 0340a08–c09;六十偈行,依本疏計四十五偈 | 「北涼三藏法師曇無讖譯」(0335b04) |
| 寶貴合部 T16n0664 | 「金光明經空品第八」(0379b06);偈文 0379b08–0380a15;前六十行承舊本,末增六行 | 卷四署「隋大興善寺沙門釋寶貴合」(0378b04);本品另署「北涼天竺三藏曇無讖譯」(0379b07) |
| 義淨本 T16n0665 | 「金光明最勝王經重顯空性品第九」(0424a19);品首散文、六十六偈行合三十三頌、品末得益散文 | 「大唐三藏沙門義淨奉 制譯」(0422b26) |
寶貴本是合部,不另虛構一位本品譯者。三本的正面事實是同有空品內容;品次、句式、偈數與首尾詳略不同,對勘只依內容節點並列,不拿一本文字改另一本文字。
| 節點 | 曇無讖本、寶貴合部 | 義淨本 | 並觀所見 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 廣說與略說 | 皆起「無量餘經,已廣說空,是故此中,略而解說。」(T663 0340a08–a09;T664 0379b08–b09) | 「我已於餘甚深經,廣說真空微妙法;今復於此經王內,略說空法不思議。」(T665 0424a23–a24) | 三本同立廣、略之意 |
| 空聚與根塵 | 舊本說「是身虛偽,猶如空聚」(T663 0340a14),又細說六情與諸塵 | 義淨本說「當知此身如空聚,六賊依止不相知」(0424a29) | 身、根、境與賊喻相應,切句不同 |
| 鳥喻 | 舊本作「心處六情,如鳥投網」(T663 0340a24–a25) | 義淨本作「隨緣遍行於六根,如鳥飛空無障礙」(0424b10) | 投網與飛空各守其本,不相會通 |
| 四大與業身 | 舊本有四蛇同篋、沈下上升、隨業受報 | 義淨本有四毒蛇居一篋、沈下輕舉、隨業受身 | 節點相應,辭序有別 |
| 無明與緣起 | 舊本列無明、行識、名色、六入、觸受、愛取有、生老死 | 義淨本列無明緣有及其餘諸支 | 同說緣起輪迴,字面各異 |
| 甘露與法化 | 舊本有甘露門、器、城、室、味及法螺、法鼓、法炬 | 義淨本有甘露城門、器、味,及法鼓、法螺、明燈、法雨 | 譬喻次序與用字不同 |
| 末段修行 | 舊本至供佛、修菩提、妻子財寶之施 | 義淨本續明諸度、十地、正覺 | 詳略不同,不倒補舊本 |
| 佛智校量 | T663 無;T664 另有六偈行 | T665 末五頌具足三千界、十方塵數與一念智校量 | T664、T665 同有此節點;只誌傳文,不判先後 |
| 品末得益 | T663、T664 無散文得益段 | T665 有大眾了達、願修、慶喜、奉持 | 首尾形制不同 |
T663/T664 前六十偈行的十一處非標點字差
下表依兩本前六十偈行逐行對位,十一處全錄;其餘偈行去標點與空白後同文。每格照錄本字,不以其中一讀改另一讀。
| 序 | 曇無讖本 T663 | 寶貴合部 T664 | 異存 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 一 | 「假為空聚」(0340a29) | 「假偽空聚」(0379b29) | 為/偽 |
| 二 | 「性輕上升」(0340b06) | 「性輕上昇」(0379c06) | 升/昇 |
| 三 | 「人天諸趣」(0340b07) | 「天人諸趣」(0379c07) | 語序互倒 |
| 四 | 「而墮諸有」(0340b08) | 「而墮三有」(0379c08) | 諸/三 |
| 五 | 「無明體相」(0340b15) | 「無明體性」(0379c15) | 相/性 |
| 六 | 「和合而有」(0340b16) | 「和合而生」(0379c16) | 有/生 |
| 七 | 「老死愁惱」(0340b19) | 「老、死、憂、惱」(0379c19) | 愁/憂(不計標點) |
| 八 | 「然大法炬」(0340b27) | 「然大法燈」(0379c27) | 炬/燈 |
| 九 | 「令離焦熱」(0340c04) | 「令離燋熱」(0380a04) | 焦/燋 |
| 十 | 「堅固修習」(0340c06) | 「堅固修集」(0380a06) | 習/集 |
| 十一 | 「所愛妻子」(0340c08) | 「所愛男女」(0380a08) | 妻子/男女 |
T664 相對 T663 的六行增文
曇無讖本於「種種異物」(T16n0663 0340c09)後收品;合部本在同一節點後續有六行,逐行全錄如下:
- 「三千大千世界中,所有樹木折為籌,」(T16n0664 0380a10)
- 「三千大地碎微塵,是等微塵遍虛空,」(T16n0664 0380a11)
- 「一切眾生有智慧,以此智慧與一人,」(T16n0664 0380a12)
- 「如是人等如微塵,算此微塵可知數;」(T16n0664 0380a13)
- 「如來智慧不可數,如來一念有智慧,」(T16n0664 0380a14)
- 「不可數劫算不盡。」(T16n0664 0380a15)
此六行與義淨本末五頌的草木、微塵、眾生智與如來一念智節點相應;只作傳本並觀,不據此判其來源。
三家正疏皆逐文覆蓋
| 疏家 | 正釋邊界與所依本 | 全品大科 |
|---|---|---|
| 慧沼《金光明最勝王經疏》T39n1788 | 品題「重顯空性品第九」(0272b28);正釋至 0276b15;疏義淨本三十三頌 | 先三頌總標,後三十頌依第一科判八空;另存十七頌說空、其後說因的第二科 |
| 智顗《金光明經文句》T39n1785 | 0066a18–0073a21;疏曇無讖本四十五行偈 | 初四行半敘欲說空,次四十行半正說空;正說又分生法二空境與生法二空觀 |
| 吉藏《金光明經疏》T39n1787 | 0165a16–0166a11;疏曇無讖本四十五偈 | 初四行半序略說意,次二十八行正說空理,末十二行半舉益勸修 |
智顗《玄義》與知禮《玄義拾遺記》另有品義旁證,屬玄義層,不列作第四家逐句正疏。知禮另有《金光明經文句記》T39n1786 逐文記,舊本〈空品〉之記釋自「釋〈空品〉,二:初、釋題」〔T39n1786 0126a22〕起,與玄義層分書。三家所依本、偈數與科法不同,均有正面文本根據,並錄不判。
三、唯識義之經據(眼)
本品經文先把所觀之境逐層展開:身如空聚,六根與六境各住其位,識如幻化而依根緣境;四大共成一身而性相違,心識依身造作善惡,隨業受身;再由我與眾生之執轉到無明、十二支與輪迴,最後由斷惑、正智、五蘊空展開利生與修行。慧沼的唯識鏡只在這些經文節點上起釋,不代替經文。
一、空性三義並存。 慧沼釋題先說:「一者空即是性,即遍計所執我法二種」(T39n1788 0272c07)。又說:「二者空之性即真如,是空之真性,因空所顯,故云空性,非體性空」(0272c07–c09)。再說:「三者依他亦名空性,名無生性故。」(0272c09–c10)三義後接「此即依他,但空二執,不空依圓故。」(0272c10–c11)這是疏家的三性、二執判,不回寫成經文自列。
二、八空是科判,不是經中八個標題。 慧沼說:「十八空中但明八種,謂內空、外空、內外空、畢竟空、無際空、無散空、自性空、一切法空,影顯餘故。」(0273a10–a12)其科法以初十二頌明初三空,半頌明畢竟空,四頌半明無際空,次二頌分判無散空與本性空,其餘十一頌明一切法空。經文仍保持自身三十三頌的連續次第。
三、根、境、識相待而立。 慧沼釋「遍行六根」存二解,並列不擇一:「遍行六根者,或一意識義。又約一意處現起之識,云遍行六根。」(T39n1788 0274a06–a07)——「或」「又約」二讀同疏並存,並錄不判。慧沼又於識如幻段說:「識如幻事從顛倒生,妄想取境如走空聚。」(0273c29–0274a01)又說:「根藉識取境,識無根不有。境因心變,境離心無。」(0274a14–a15)這是疏家以內、外、內外三空及唯識無境照讀根境識;經文本身只直說識依根、託根緣境而了諸事。
四、緣生與二執不相混。 對「無明自性本是無,藉眾緣力和合有」(T16n0665 0424b28),慧沼釋為:「非神我等起、非自性等因生,云本無。但眾緣有,明緣生義。」(0274c22–c23)其後又以心所變、識外體空釋輪迴段。空二執與依緣而有在此鏡中並陳,不能把空性單寫成斷滅。
四之餘、甘露段二向並錄。 慧沼順句直釋作「既得甘露等,明他聞得,得即證也。常以施生,明他能施。」,緊接又存返釋一讀:「或此釋前我開城之所以,我既自證,故施群生」(T39n1788 0275b13–b14)——直釋(他聞得/他能施)與返釋(釋前「我開城」之所以)二向同疏並存,不刪「或」,不會成單一次第。
五、空觀不止於拆身。 經文由斷煩惱、五蘊宅空,續說甘露施生、法鼓法螺、濟群迷、供佛持戒、布施諸度、十地正覺。慧沼將「我斷一切」(T16n0665 0424c05)判無散空,將「我開甘露」(0424c07)判本性空,餘文判一切法空;又以觀空修諸行滿釋一切智。此是疏家由觀空讀到利生與成智的次第,不把前段空義與後段行願割裂。
四、諸家異釋(古德·標宗·誌錄不判)
| 節點 | 慧沼《疏》 | 智顗《文句》 | 吉藏《疏》 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 本品來意 | 以前品大乘行須託境生,今廣明我法二空、除二執 | 以空品導成懺品破惡、讚品生善 | 以般若導前功德 |
| 廣說、略說 | 十八空中略明八空 | 生法二空名略而義廣,又就聞持能力論利鈍 | 依理說廣為利根、略為鈍根;依教又反向並存 |
| 全品大科 | 三十三頌依八空分判,另存第二科 | 四十五行偈分敘說與正說,正說分境與觀 | 四十五偈分序意、空理、利益勸修 |
| 空聚、根塵 | 內空、外空、內外空 | 生空境後細檢根塵為法空境 | 五非常門中的無我門 |
| 識如幻 | 識依根緣境,根境既空而識非有 | 舊本心如幻段明十八界 | 舊本心識如幻、自生自滅,鳥投網喻在處即滅 |
| 四大與不淨 | 四大相乖無常有苦;死後不淨為內外空末段 | 四大、業力分釋;不淨是助道假想境 | 五非常門中的空、苦、不淨三門 |
| 當觀轉折 | 半頌判畢竟空,亦可結前無我 | 自此起生法二空觀 | 由俗諦五非常門結入真諦,再轉法空 |
| 無明與十二支 | 無際空,眾緣有而無實體 | 十二因緣生法二空境與觀 | 以真如淨心、水波之譬釋無明 |
| 我斷一切 | 無散空 | 果上生法二空用,觀成證果 | 舉益勸修 |
| 甘露 | 本性空;城門配能詮教,器配行佛性 | 配斷德與十住、十行、十迴向、十地、妙覺 | 甘露譬涅槃果,又配聞、思、修三慧 |
| 法鼓等四譬 | 配開權、說教、照涅槃理、成就智身 | 配果地化他與四弘誓願 | 配改小乘名句、進勝境、顯法、增長善根 |
| 濟生(降伏怨結·關閉惡趣·甘露除熱) | 配四諦四弘:「關閉惡趣,令捨苦諦。煩惱燒生至無依止,令斷集諦。甘露充足彼,令證滅諦。身心熱竝皆除,此能除者令修道諦〔……〕即四弘願功德。」(0275c23–c27) | 亦配四弘/四諦而切句與經序不同:依經序先列第一、第二、第四弘,至「於無量劫」以下方列第三弘(T39n1785 0073a07–a16) | 另分二德:「初一行明摧邪德〔……〕次三行偈明拔苦德」(T39n1787 0166a04) |
| 末段行施 | 五勝利、諸度與佛智校量 | 四弘、道諦與檀攝六度;所依舊本無佛智段 | 四修與內施、內外施、外施;所依舊本無佛智段 |
智顗《玄義》另說:「空品雙導,懺不得空惡不除滅,讚不得空善不清淨。」(T39n1783 0011c10–c11)知禮《玄義拾遺記》說:「唯此經〈空品〉明於圓空,即先觀生空、次觀法空。」(T39n1784 0032c09–c10)又說:「此品圓譚,即空假中蕩三惑著,名畢竟空,導成懺讚二種之用。」(0044c18–c19)這些是天台玄義層讀法,不改標為義淨本逐句疏。
三家於來意、全品大科、根境識、無明、甘露與行施的判讀並不相同。差異既有底本文句與偈數之別,也有各家立科之別;本編只標明所據與原說,不把多家熔成一種空義。
五、術語
空性。 經題作重顯空性,品首又說重明空性。經文以身、根、境、識、四大、無明緣起與五蘊等逐段顯空;慧沼再以空即性、空之性、依他無生性三義釋題,並說只空二執、不空依圓。經與疏兩層分書。
舜若、舜若多。 慧沼傳古德音寫:「若云舜若空即是性,云舜若多即空之性」(T39n1788 0272c13–c14)。只依古德漢字音寫與隨文義保存,不另作字形還原。
空聚、六賊。 經以身如空聚、六賊依止說根境;慧沼既以聚沫解身不堅固,也以有漏虛偽、無功德解空聚,並說六根、六境能為緣損壞善品,故名為賊。空聚不是外在鬼神居處,六賊也不離根境而另成實體。
無生。 經說大種「本非實有體無生」(T16n0665 0424b26)。慧沼釋「皆從緣起,無自然生,故云無生。」(T39n1788 0274c17–c18)故此處同時守住緣起與無自然生,不把無生寫成否定一切緣起現象。
無明。 經一面說「無明自性本是無」,一面說「藉眾緣力和合有」(T16n0665 0424b28),又以失正慧名無明。慧沼以非神我、自性等因生而但眾緣有釋之;吉藏另以真如淨心與水波作讀。各說繫各家,不互代。
無散空。 此名只見慧沼科判。疏把「我斷一切諸煩惱」(T16n0665 0424c05)一頌判為無散空,並以不捨生死、不捨涅槃解其作用;經文本身沒有另標此空名。
自性空、本性空。 慧沼總科作自性空,逐文至甘露頌又作本性空;兩處原字並存,不以一詞統改另一詞。
生法二空。 智顗依曇無讖本以生空、法空分境與觀;此是天台逐文科判,不移作慧沼八空科法,也不冒稱義淨本自列名目。
甘露。 義淨本有城門、器、真實味與施群生;舊本另有門、器、城、室、味。慧沼、智顗、吉藏各有配釋,凡配涅槃、行佛性、諸位或聞思修者,均署為古德判語。
六、譬喻·修辭
空聚與六賊。 經把身寫作空聚,把六塵寫作分依諸根的賊。譬喻先鬆開『身中有一主宰』的直覺,再逐根、逐境、逐識觀察其各緣自境與彼此不相知。
如幻與鳥喻。 義淨本說識如幻化,又說心識隨緣遍行六根「如鳥飛空無障礙」(T16n0665 0424b10);曇無讖本則作「如鳥投網」(T16n0663 0340a25)。兩幅圖像方向不同,疏家亦各守底本解釋,不以整齊為由抹平。
機關木人與四蛇同篋。 經說身無知、無作者,譬如機關由業轉;又以四毒蛇同居一篋,顯地水火風同成一身而性有沈舉、彼此相違。機關是木人譬,不能改解為制度;四蛇沈舉也不另添現代物理說明。
屍林如朽木。 疾病身死之後,經直陳大小便利、膿爛蟲蛆與棄在屍林。這一段以具體不淨相破除對身的可樂想,不以委婉語刪去經文所列形貌。
浮虛。 經說大種性空,知其浮虛非實有。慧沼以浮漚譬作釋;此譬指緣起而不實,不把『浮虛』誤作漂浮的虛空。
甘露、法鼓、法螺、明燈、法雨。 前段觀空之後,經連用五種利生意象:甘露除熱,鼓螺宣法,明燈照闇,法雨潤益。諸家對四譬所配之教義不同,並列於前目,不混成經文自說。
四蛇與四種法化前後相映。 前半四蛇同篋寫身內相違,後半法鼓、法螺、明燈、法雨寫利生行動;本品的修辭由解構身聚,轉到開門施味與宣法濟生,不停在否定。
微塵校量。 末五頌先把一個三千大千世界的草木細末成塵,再推至十方諸剎,又假使一切眾生智慧合於一人;如此或能知微塵之數,仍不能算知牟尼一念智的少分。校量只落在一念智之少分,不泛改成經文未說的一切皆不可知。
七、互讀·承衍
承〈金勝陀羅尼品〉。 前品末以「既稱心已,常持莫忘」(T16n0665 0424a18)收束,本品隨即說:「爾時,世尊說此呪已」(0424a20)。空性偈不是與受持陀羅尼無關的新題,而由經文自身以『說呪已』明確接起。
由行入境。 前品交付稱名、禮敬、持呪、懺悔與道場次第,本品則觀身、根、境、識、四大與緣起。慧沼把這一品次解作大乘行須託境生,故今明境;這是疏家的承接判,不冒作經文原句。
空性不截斷修行。 本品由觀空走到斷惑、求菩提、施甘露、擊法鼓、供佛持戒、布施諸度與十地正覺。經文自身已把空義與利生、修行連在一條偈序上,無須另外杜撰『空後才行』的固定因果。
承〈依空滿願品〉。 本品末記大眾正修出離、如說奉持;次品題隨即在 0425a06 出現,如意寶光耀天女又請問「甚深理修行之法」(0425a10)。本品所觀的空境,向下一品轉成依甚深理而修行之問;只依相鄰品文誌其接續,不預代下一品作答。
由此承衍,本品居於『持法』與『依空起行』之間:先承已說之呪,再把身心世界置於空性觀照中,繼而由經文自身展開斷惑、利生、諸度與正覺,末後交到下一品的修行之問。空性不是刪去前行與後行,而是本經在兩者之間重顯的所觀之境。
八、校本定位
- 本譯注以義淨譯 T16n0665 為底本。本品所在卷五譯人題記在 0422b26,品題在 0424a19,品身 0424a20–0425a05,下一品題 0425a06。品身有六十六偈行,每二行為一頌,合三十三頌。
- 曇無讖本 T16n0663 題〈空品第五〉,偈文 0340a08–c09;寶貴合部 T16n0664 題〈空品第八〉,偈文 0379b08–0380a15;義淨本題〈重顯空性品第九〉。三本皆有對應品文。
- T663 前六十偈行與 T664 前六十偈行共有十一處非標點字差,已於目二全列;T664 又有六偈行增文,亦逐行全錄。不可只舉樣本而宣稱全校,也不可把一本文字默改成另一本文字。
- T663 的六十個偈行每行含三個四字句,古疏計四十五偈;T664 前六十行承同一形制,末六行改為七言雙句;T665 六十六行皆為七言雙句,合三十三頌。偈行數相同不等於偈數相同。
- T663 沒有末段佛智校量,T664、T665 有相應節點;T665 另有品首承呪散文與品末得益散文。詳略各守其本,不以來源推論代替文本事實。
- 慧沼 T39n1788 正疏 0272b28–0276b15,智顗 T39n1785 正疏 0066a18–0073a21,吉藏 T39n1787 正疏 0165a16–0166a11。智顗《玄義》與知禮《玄義拾遺記》只作玄義層旁證。
- 慧沼正疏總科作自性空,逐文作本性空;半頌又同時存畢竟空與結前無我兩讀。這些是同一疏內原字與異科,均不統改。
- 本品考據只用三本經文及慧沼、智顗、吉藏、知禮等古德傳文。卷品、題署、品界、偈數、異存與疏界均各自繫明,讀者可由所標出處回到原典覆核。
三本同傳空品,三家各以自己的底本與科法逐文解讀。校本的責任不是替它們選出一個整齊聲音,而是把相同節點、不同原字、不同詳略與不同空義判讀一併保存。並列這些差異,本品由空聚、緣起到利生、佛智的經文弧線與各家讀法,便可分層看見。
Placement of the whole chapter. This chapter follows directly upon the end of “The Golden-Victory Dhāraṇī.” After the World-Honored One has spoken the formula, he again clarifies emptiness in thirty-three stanzas so that the bodhisattvas and the human and divine assembly may understand the profound, true, ultimate meaning. The final passage records that the assembly understood the emptiness of the four great elements and five aggregates and the delusive bindings produced by the six faculties and six objects, vowed to leave saṃsāra, and upheld the teaching. The recensions of Dharmakṣema, Baogui’s composite edition, and Yijing all contain corresponding chapter texts. Huizhao, Zhiyi, and Jizang each provide a line-by-line commentary; Zhili’s Record of the Words and Phrases also comments line by line, while his Supplementary Notes preserves a reading on the level of profound meaning. Recensional evidence, outlines, and differing interpretations of emptiness are each kept in their proper layer and recorded without adjudicating.
I. Doctrinal-Outline Placement
The translator attribution in fascicle five reads 「大唐三藏沙門義淨奉 制譯」—“Translated under imperial decree by the Tripiṭaka Master and śramaṇa Yijing of the Great Tang” (T16n0665 0422b26, its fifth occurrence in this sūtra). The chapter title 「金光明最勝王經重顯空性品第九」—“The Sūtra of Golden Light, the Supreme King, ‘Reaffirming Emptiness,’ Chapter 9”—stands at 0424a19. The chapter body extends from 0424a20 through 0425a05; at 0425a06 the title of “Fulfilling Vows through Emptiness,” Chapter 10, has already begun.
According to the actions visible in the sūtra text itself, the chapter can be divided into seven passages:
| Passage | Location | What the sūtra does |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0424a20–a22 | Carries forward from the preceding formula, identifies the assembly to be benefited and the ultimate meaning to be understood, and again clarifies emptiness |
| 2 | 0424a23–a28 | Explains that other sūtras teach extensively while this sūtra teaches briefly; because sentient beings find it difficult to understand, the teaching is repeated through great compassion and skillful means |
| 3 | 0424a29–b23 | Contemplates the body, six faculties, six objects, mind and consciousness, four great elements, karmic retribution, and the body’s impurity after death |
| 4 | 0424b24–c04 | Questions attachment to self and sentient being and contemplates the impermanence of dharmas, ignorance, dependent arising, and its twelve links |
| 5 | 0424c05–c20 | Severs afflictions and seeks awakening; benefits beings through nectar, the Dharma-drum, Dharma-conch, bright lamp, and Dharma-rain; practices the perfections throughout and realizes right awakening |
| 6 | 0424c21–0425a01 | Uses the particles of a trichiliocosm and of lands throughout the ten directions to measure by comparison a single thought of the Sage’s wisdom |
| 7 | 0425a02–a05 | The assembly hears emptiness, understands, vows to cultivate, rejoices, and upholds the teaching |
Huizhao first outlines the chapter as follows: 「品文分三,一初結集敘說所因、二佛為重陳空義、三時眾獲益慶躍奉行。」—“The chapter text is divided into three: first, the initial compilation statement narrating the reason for the teaching; second, the Buddha’s renewed presentation of the meaning of emptiness; and third, the assembly at that time gaining benefit, rejoicing, and putting it into practice” (T39n1788 0272c26–c27). He then outlines the verse: 「有三十三頌,分二:初三頌總標說意、次三十頌別為說空。」—“There are thirty-three stanzas, divided into two: the first three generally state the intent of the teaching, and the next thirty teach emptiness in particular” (T39n1788 0273a05–a06). Under his first outline, these thirty stanzas are further divided into the first three emptinesses, ultimate emptiness, beginningless emptiness, non-dispersal emptiness, intrinsic-nature emptiness, and the emptiness of all dharmas. His general outline says “intrinsic-nature emptiness,” while his line-by-line explanation also says “original-nature emptiness”; each wording is preserved where it occurs.
Huizhao also preserves another general outline. He first says, 「又解:初三頌科解如前、次十七頌正為說空、後」—“Another explanation: the outline and explanation of the first three stanzas are as above; the next seventeen stanzas directly teach emptiness; afterward…” (T39n1788 0273b28–b29), then cites the sūtra words 「我斷一切煩惱」—“I have severed all afflictions” (0273c01), and continues, 「下明說空所因。且依第一。」—“From here onward the reason for teaching emptiness is clarified. For the present, follow the first [outline]” (0273c01). Two outlines thus coexist within the same commentary. This edition uses the first as its structural account because Huizhao expressly says to follow it, while also preserving the second without deleting or conflating it.
II. Alternate Translations · Collation of the Three Translations
All Three Recensions Contain This Chapter
| Recension | Chapter title, boundaries, and form | Translator attribution for the fascicle containing the chapter |
|---|---|---|
| Dharmakṣema T16n0663 | 「金光明經空品第五」—“The Sūtra of Golden Light, ‘Emptiness,’ Chapter 5” (0340a07); verse text 0340a08–c09; sixty verse lines, counted by its commentary as forty-five stanzas | 「北涼三藏法師曇無讖譯」—“Translated by the Tripiṭaka Master Dharmakṣema of the Northern Liang” (0335b04) |
| Baogui’s composite T16n0664 | 「金光明經空品第八」—“The Sūtra of Golden Light, ‘Emptiness,’ Chapter 8” (0379b06); verse text 0379b08–0380a15; the first sixty lines carry forward the older recension and six lines are added at the end | Fascicle four reads 「隋大興善寺沙門釋寶貴合」—“Compiled by the śramaṇa Baogui of Daxingshan Monastery in the Sui” (0378b04); this chapter separately reads 「北涼天竺三藏曇無讖譯」—“Translated by the Indian Tripiṭaka Master Dharmakṣema of the Northern Liang” (0379b07) |
| Yijing T16n0665 | 「金光明最勝王經重顯空性品第九」—“The Sūtra of Golden Light, the Supreme King, ‘Reaffirming Emptiness,’ Chapter 9” (0424a19); opening prose, sixty-six verse lines forming thirty-three stanzas, and a prose benefit passage at the end | 「大唐三藏沙門義淨奉 制譯」—“Translated under imperial decree by the Tripiṭaka Master and śramaṇa Yijing of the Great Tang” (0422b26) |
Baogui’s text is a composite edition; it does not warrant inventing a separate translator for this chapter. The positive textual fact is that all three recensions contain an emptiness chapter. Their chapter numbers, phrasing, stanza counts, and degree of elaboration at the beginning and end differ. Parallel reading sets corresponding content nodes beside one another and does not use one recension’s wording to emend another.
| Content node | Dharmakṣema and Baogui’s composite edition | Yijing | What parallel reading shows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extensive and brief teaching | Both begin, 「無量餘經,已廣說空,是故此中,略而解說。」—“In immeasurable other sūtras emptiness has already been extensively taught; therefore here it is explained only briefly” (T663 0340a08–a09; T664 0379b08–b09) | 「我已於餘甚深經,廣說真空微妙法;今復於此經王內,略說空法不思議。」—“In other profound sūtras I have extensively taught the subtle Dharma of true emptiness; now again, within this king of sūtras, I briefly teach the inconceivable Dharma of emptiness” (T665 0424a23–a24) | All three establish the intent of extensive and brief teaching |
| Empty aggregate and faculties and objects | The older recensions say 「是身虛偽,猶如空聚」—“This body is false and hollow, like an empty aggregate” (T663 0340a14), and then detail the six sense faculties and objects | Yijing says 「當知此身如空聚,六賊依止不相知」—“Know that this body is like an empty aggregate; the six thieves depend upon it but do not know one another” (0424a29) | Body, faculties, objects, and the thieves simile correspond, but the phrasing differs |
| Bird simile | The older recensions say 「心處六情,如鳥投網」—“The mind dwells among the six faculties like a bird entering a net” (T663 0340a24–a25) | Yijing says 「隨緣遍行於六根,如鳥飛空無障礙」—“Following conditions, it ranges throughout the six faculties like a bird flying unobstructed through the sky” (0424b10) | Entering a net and flying through the sky each remain with their own recension; they are not harmonized |
| Four great elements and the karmic body | The older recensions have four snakes in one box, sinking and rising, and receiving retribution according to karma | Yijing has four venomous snakes in one box, sinking and lifting lightly, and taking on a body according to karma | The content nodes correspond while wording and sequence differ |
| Ignorance and dependent arising | The older recensions list ignorance, formations and consciousness, name-and-form, the six entrances, contact and feeling, craving, clinging, existence, birth, and aging-and-death | Yijing lists the conditioned existence of ignorance and all the remaining links | Both teach dependent arising and saṃsāra, while their literal wording differs |
| Nectar and Dharma activity | The older recensions include the gate, vessel, city, chamber, and taste of nectar, together with the Dharma-conch, Dharma-drum, and Dharma-torch | Yijing includes the gate of the city of nectar, vessel and taste, together with the Dharma-drum, Dharma-conch, bright lamp, and Dharma-rain | The order and diction of the similes differ |
| Practice at the end | The older recensions reach honoring buddhas, cultivating awakening, and giving wife, children, and wealth | Yijing continues through the perfections, ten grounds, and right awakening | Their degree of elaboration differs; the older text is not retrospectively supplemented |
| Comparative measure of buddha-wisdom | Absent from T663; T664 adds six verse lines | T665 has five concluding stanzas with the trichiliocosm, particles throughout the ten directions, and a comparison to the wisdom of a single thought | T664 and T665 share this content node; only the transmitted textual state is recorded, without judging priority |
| Benefit passage at the end | T663 and T664 have no prose benefit passage | T665 records the assembly’s understanding, vow to cultivate, rejoicing, and upholding | The forms of the beginnings and endings differ |
The Eleven Non-Punctuation Character Variants in the First Sixty Verse Lines of T663 and T664
The table below aligns the first sixty verse lines of the two recensions and records all eleven differences. After punctuation and spaces are removed, the remaining verse lines are textually identical. Each cell transcribes its own witness exactly; neither reading is used to alter the other.
| No. | Dharmakṣema T663 | Baogui’s composite T664 | Difference preserved |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 「假為空聚」—“provisionally made an empty aggregate” (0340a29) | 「假偽空聚」—“a provisional, false empty aggregate” (0379b29) | 為/偽 |
| 2 | 「性輕上升」—“whose nature is light, rises upward” (0340b06) | 「性輕上昇」—“whose nature is light, rises upward” (0379c06) | 升/昇 |
| 3 | 「人天諸趣」—“human, divine, and the various destinies” (0340b07) | 「天人諸趣」—“divine, human, and the various destinies” (0379c07) | Reversed word order |
| 4 | 「而墮諸有」—“and falls among the various modes of existence” (0340b08) | 「而墮三有」—“and falls into the three modes of existence” (0379c08) | 諸/三 |
| 5 | 「無明體相」—“the defining character of ignorance” (0340b15) | 「無明體性」—“the essential nature of ignorance” (0379c15) | 相/性 |
| 6 | 「和合而有」—“exists through conjunction” (0340b16) | 「和合而生」—“arises through conjunction” (0379c16) | 有/生 |
| 7 | 「老死愁惱」—“aging, death, sorrow, and distress” (0340b19) | 「老、死、憂、惱」—“aging, death, grief, and distress” (0379c19) | 愁/憂 (punctuation excluded) |
| 8 | 「然大法炬」—“lights the great Dharma-torch” (0340b27) | 「然大法燈」—“lights the great Dharma-lamp” (0379c27) | 炬/燈 |
| 9 | 「令離焦熱」—“causes them to leave searing heat” (0340c04) | 「令離燋熱」—“causes them to leave scorching heat” (0380a04) | 焦/燋 |
| 10 | 「堅固修習」—“steadfastly cultivates and trains” (0340c06) | 「堅固修集」—“steadfastly cultivates and accumulates” (0380a06) | 習/集 |
| 11 | 「所愛妻子」—“beloved wife and children” (0340c08) | 「所愛男女」—“beloved sons and daughters” (0380a08) | 妻子/男女 |
The Six Lines Added in T664 Relative to T663
Dharmakṣema’s recension ends the chapter after 「種種異物」—“various unusual things” (T16n0663 0340c09). At the corresponding point, the composite edition continues with six lines, transcribed in full line by line:
- 「三千大千世界中,所有樹木折為籌,」—“Within a trichiliocosm, cut all the trees into counting rods” (T16n0664 0380a10)
- 「三千大地碎微塵,是等微塵遍虛空,」—“Pulverize the great earth of the trichiliocosm into minute particles, and let these particles fill empty space” (T16n0664 0380a11)
- 「一切眾生有智慧,以此智慧與一人,」—“Take the wisdom possessed by all sentient beings and give this wisdom to one person” (T16n0664 0380a12)
- 「如是人等如微塵,算此微塵可知數;」—“Let people such as this be as numerous as the particles; they might calculate and know the number of those particles” (T16n0664 0380a13)
- 「如來智慧不可數,如來一念有智慧,」—“The Tathāgata’s wisdom cannot be counted; the Tathāgata has wisdom in a single thought” (T16n0664 0380a14)
- 「不可數劫算不盡。」—“which could not be exhausted by calculation through incalculable eons” (T16n0664 0380a15)
These six lines correspond to the vegetation, particles, beings’ wisdom, and a single thought of the Tathāgata’s wisdom in the final five stanzas of Yijing’s recension. They are placed together only for comparison of the transmitted texts; no conclusion about their origin is drawn from the correspondence.
All Three Principal Commentaries Cover the Chapter Line by Line
| Commentator | Boundaries of the principal explanation and recension followed | Outline of the whole chapter |
|---|---|---|
| Huizhao’s Commentary on the Sūtra of Golden Light, the Supreme King T39n1788 | Title 「重顯空性品第九」—“Reaffirming Emptiness, Chapter 9” (0272b28); principal explanation through 0276b15; comments on Yijing’s thirty-three stanzas | First three stanzas generally state the intent; the next thirty are divided under his first outline among eight emptinesses; a second outline of seventeen stanzas teaching emptiness followed by the reason for teaching it is also preserved |
| Zhiyi’s Words and Phrases of the Sūtra of Golden Light T39n1785 | 0066a18–0073a21; comments on the forty-five verse units of Dharmakṣema’s recension | The first four and a half units narrate the intent to teach emptiness; the next forty and a half directly teach emptiness, divided into the objects and contemplations of the two emptinesses of persons and dharmas |
| Jizang’s Commentary on the Sūtra of Golden Light T39n1787 | 0165a16–0166a11; comments on Dharmakṣema’s forty-five stanzas | The first four and a half units introduce the intent of the brief teaching, the next twenty-eight directly teach the principle of emptiness, and the final twelve and a half present benefits and exhort cultivation |
Zhiyi’s Profound Meaning and Zhili’s Supplementary Notes on the Profound Meaning provide additional evidence concerning the meaning of the chapter, but belong to the profound-meaning layer and are not presented as a fourth line-by-line principal commentary. Zhili also wrote the Record of the Words and Phrases of the Sūtra of Golden Light T39n1786, whose line-by-line annotation of the older “Emptiness” chapter begins with 「釋〈空品〉,二:初、釋題」—“Explanation of the ‘Emptiness’ chapter, in two parts: first, explanation of the title” 〔T39n1786 0126a22〕; this is a separate work from the profound-meaning layer. The three commentators use different recensions, stanza counts, and outlines. Each has positive textual grounds; all are recorded without adjudicating.
III. Scriptural Grounds for the Consciousness-Only Meaning (the Point of the Eye)
The chapter first unfolds the object of contemplation layer by layer: the body is like an empty aggregate; the six faculties and six objects each occupy their own place; consciousness is illusory, depending on faculties and taking objects as conditions; the four great elements jointly constitute one body yet oppose one another; mind-consciousness depends on the body, produces good and bad karma, and takes on bodies according to karma. It then turns from attachment to self and sentient being to ignorance, the twelve links, and saṃsāra, and finally moves from severing afflictions and the emptiness of the five aggregates into benefiting beings and cultivating the path. Huizhao’s consciousness-only mirror begins only at these nodes in the sūtra; it does not replace the sūtra text.
1. Three meanings of emptiness coexist. Huizhao first explains the title by saying, 「一者空即是性,即遍計所執我法二種」—“First, emptiness itself is nature: namely, the two wholly-imagined attachments to person and dharmas” (T39n1788 0272c07). He then says, 「二者空之性即真如,是空之真性,因空所顯,故云空性,非體性空」—“Second, the nature of emptiness is suchness, the true nature of emptiness. Because it is disclosed through emptiness, it is called emptiness-nature; it is not that its own essential nature is empty” (0272c07–c09). He next says, 「三者依他亦名空性,名無生性故。」—“Third, the other-dependent is also called emptiness-nature, because it is called the nature of non-arising” (0272c09–c10). These three are followed by 「此即依他,但空二執,不空依圓故。」—“This is precisely the other-dependent: it empties only the two attachments and does not empty the other-dependent or the perfectly-accomplished” (0272c10–c11). This is the commentator’s analysis in terms of the three natures and two attachments; it is not written backward into the sūtra as a list spoken there.
2. The eight emptinesses are an outline, not eight headings in the sūtra. Huizhao says, 「十八空中但明八種,謂內空、外空、內外空、畢竟空、無際空、無散空、自性空、一切法空,影顯餘故。」—“Among the eighteen emptinesses only eight are clarified: inner emptiness, outer emptiness, inner-and-outer emptiness, ultimate emptiness, beginningless emptiness, non-dispersal emptiness, intrinsic-nature emptiness, and the emptiness of all dharmas, thereby indirectly revealing the rest” (0273a10–a12). In his outline, the first twelve stanzas clarify the first three emptinesses; half a stanza clarifies ultimate emptiness; four and a half clarify beginningless emptiness; the next two are respectively assigned to non-dispersal emptiness and original-nature emptiness; and the remaining eleven clarify the emptiness of all dharmas. The sūtra itself retains the continuous order of its thirty-three stanzas.
3. Faculty, object, and consciousness stand in mutual dependence. Huizhao preserves two readings of 「遍行六根」—“ranges throughout the six faculties”—without choosing between them: 「遍行六根者,或一意識義。又約一意處現起之識,云遍行六根。」—“‘Ranges throughout the six faculties’ may mean a single mental consciousness. Alternatively, with reference to consciousness presently arising at the faculty of mind, it is said to range throughout the six faculties” (T39n1788 0274a06–a07). The markers 「或」—“may”—and 「又約」—“alternatively, with reference to”—remain as two readings within one commentary and are recorded without adjudicating. On the passage in which consciousness is like an illusion, Huizhao also says, 「識如幻事從顛倒生,妄想取境如走空聚。」—“Consciousness, like an illusory event, arises from inversion; delusive conception grasps objects like one running through an empty aggregate” (0273c29–0274a01). He further says, 「根藉識取境,識無根不有。境因心變,境離心無。」—“The faculties rely on consciousness to apprehend objects, and without faculties consciousness does not exist. Objects arise through transformation by mind, and apart from mind no object exists” (0274a14–a15). This is the commentator’s consciousness-only reading of faculty, object, and consciousness through inner, outer, and inner-and-outer emptiness. The sūtra itself directly says only that consciousness depends on the faculties, entrusts itself to them, takes objects as conditions, and cognizes things.
4. Conditioned arising and the two attachments are not conflated. For 「無明自性本是無,藉眾緣力和合有」—“The self-nature of ignorance is originally absent; through the power of many conditions, it exists in conjunction” (T16n0665 0424b28), Huizhao explains, 「非神我等起、非自性等因生,云本無。但眾緣有,明緣生義。」—“It is not produced by a spiritual self and the like, nor born from such causes as inherent nature; hence it is said to be originally absent. It exists only through many conditions, clarifying the meaning of conditioned arising” (0274c22–c23). He later explains the passage on saṃsāra through transformation by mind and the emptiness of an entity external to consciousness. In this mirror, emptying the two attachments and existing through conditions are stated together. Emptiness cannot be reduced to annihilation.
4, continued. Two directions in the nectar passage are both recorded. Huizhao first follows the wording directly: 「既得甘露等,明他聞得,得即證也。常以施生,明他能施。」—“‘Having obtained nectar’ and so forth clarifies that others hear and attain it; attainment is realization. ‘Constantly gives it to beings’ clarifies that others can give.” Immediately afterward, he preserves a retrospective reading: 「或此釋前我開城之所以,我既自證,故施群生」—“Alternatively, this explains why the preceding text says ‘I open the city’: because I have personally realized it, I therefore give it to the multitude of beings” (T39n1788 0275b13–b14). The marker 「或」—“alternatively”—preserves this second direction, which explains the reason for 「我開城」—“I open the city.” The direct reading—others hear, attain, and can give—and the retrospective reading—explaining the reason for “I open the city”—coexist in the same commentary. “Alternatively” is not deleted, and the two are not collapsed into one sequence.
5. Contemplation of emptiness does not stop at dismantling the body. From severing afflictions and seeing the house of the five aggregates as empty, the sūtra continues through giving nectar to beings, the Dharma-drum and Dharma-conch, rescuing the deluded, honoring buddhas and upholding ethical discipline, giving, all the perfections, the ten grounds, and right awakening. Huizhao assigns 「我斷一切」—“I have severed all” (T16n0665 0424c05) to non-dispersal emptiness, 「我開甘露」—“I open [the city of] nectar” (0424c07) to original-nature emptiness, and the remaining text to the emptiness of all dharmas. He further explains all-knowing knowledge through contemplating emptiness and fulfilling the practices. This is the commentator’s sequence from contemplation of emptiness to benefiting beings and accomplishing wisdom; it does not sever the emptiness of the earlier passage from the vows and practices that follow.
IV. Explanations of Various Masters
| Content node | Huizhao’s Commentary | Zhiyi’s Words and Phrases | Jizang’s Commentary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reason for the chapter’s coming | The great-vehicle practices of the preceding chapter must arise in dependence on an object; this chapter therefore extensively clarifies the two emptinesses of person and dharmas and removes the two attachments | The emptiness chapter guides the repentance chapter in destroying evil and the praise chapter in producing good | Prajñā guides the preceding qualities |
| Extensive and brief teaching | Of eighteen emptinesses, eight are taught in brief | The two emptinesses of persons and dharmas are brief in name but extensive in meaning; another reading discusses sharp and dull capacities in relation to hearing and retention | According to principle, extensive teaching is for sharp faculties and brief teaching for dull faculties; according to teaching, the reverse reading is also preserved |
| Outline of the chapter | Thirty-three stanzas divided under eight emptinesses according to the first outline, while a second outline is also preserved | Forty-five verse units divided into narration and direct teaching; the direct teaching is divided into objects and contemplations | Forty-five stanzas divided into introductory intent, the principle of emptiness, and benefits and exhortation to cultivate |
| Empty aggregate, faculties, and objects | Inner, outer, and inner-and-outer emptiness | After the object of person-emptiness, the faculties and objects are closely examined as the object of dharma-emptiness | The no-self approach among five approaches to impermanence |
| Consciousness as illusion | Consciousness depends on faculties and takes objects as conditions; since faculties and objects are empty, consciousness does not exist independently | The older recension’s passage on mind as illusion clarifies the eighteen elements | In the older recension, mind-consciousness is illusory, arising and ceasing of itself; the bird-entering-a-net simile means that it ceases wherever it comes to rest |
| Four great elements and impurity | The four great elements conflict, so impermanence entails suffering; impurity after death concludes the passage on inner-and-outer emptiness | The four great elements and karmic power are separately explained; impurity is an auxiliary, provisionally imagined object of contemplation | The approaches of emptiness, suffering, and impurity among five approaches to impermanence |
| The turn at “one should contemplate” | Half a stanza is assigned to ultimate emptiness and may also conclude the preceding no-self | From here begin the contemplations of the two emptinesses of persons and dharmas | The five approaches to impermanence on the conventional-truth level conclude and lead into ultimate truth, then turn toward dharma-emptiness |
| Ignorance and the twelve links | Beginningless emptiness; existence through many conditions without real substance | The objects and contemplations of the two emptinesses in relation to the twelve links | Ignorance is explained through the simile of suchness as pure mind and waves upon water |
| “I have severed all” | Non-dispersal emptiness | The function of the two emptinesses of persons and dharmas at the level of fruition: the contemplation is accomplished and realization attained | Presents benefits and exhorts cultivation |
| Nectar | Original-nature emptiness; the city gate corresponds to the teaching that can express, and the vessel to buddha-nature as practice | Correlated with the quality of severance and the ten abodes, ten practices, ten dedications, ten grounds, and wondrous awakening | Nectar symbolizes the fruit of nirvāṇa and is also correlated with the three wisdoms of hearing, reflection, and cultivation |
| Four similes of Dharma activity | Correlated with revealing the provisional, teaching Dharma, illuminating the principle of nirvāṇa, and accomplishing the wisdom-body | Correlated with benefiting others on the level of fruition and the four great vows | Correlated with changing the names and phrases of the lesser vehicle, advancing into superior objects, revealing Dharma, and increasing roots of goodness |
| Saving beings (subduing enmity and bonds, closing the evil destinies, and nectar removing heat) | Correlated with the four truths and four great vows: 「關閉惡趣,令捨苦諦。煩惱燒生至無依止,令斷集諦。甘露充足彼,令證滅諦。身心熱竝皆除,此能除者令修道諦〔……〕即四弘願功德。」—“Closing the evil destinies causes beings to abandon the truth of suffering. Afflictions burn beings until they have no support or refuge, causing them to sever the truth of origination. Filling them with nectar causes them to realize the truth of cessation. Removing all heat of body and mind causes them to cultivate the truth of the path … These are precisely the qualities of the four great vows” (0275c23–c27) | Also correlated with the four great vows and four truths, but the divisions and the sūtra’s sequence differ: following the sūtra’s order, the first, second, and fourth vows are listed first; only from 「於無量劫」—“through immeasurable eons”—onward is the third vow listed (T39n1785 0073a07–a16) | Divided instead into two qualities: 「初一行明摧邪德〔……〕次三行偈明拔苦德」—“The first verse unit clarifies the quality of destroying the wrong … the next three stanzas clarify the quality of removing suffering” (T39n1787 0166a04) |
| Giving and practice at the end | Five superior benefits, the perfections, and the comparison to buddha-wisdom | The four great vows, the truth of the path, and giving as encompassing all six perfections; the older recension followed here lacks the buddha-wisdom passage | Four cultivations and inner giving, inner-and-outer giving, and outer giving; the older recension followed here lacks the buddha-wisdom passage |
Zhiyi’s Profound Meaning additionally says, 「空品雙導,懺不得空惡不除滅,讚不得空善不清淨。」—“The emptiness chapter guides both: without attaining emptiness, repentance does not remove and extinguish evil; without attaining emptiness, praise does not make goodness pure” (T39n1783 0011c10–c11). Zhili’s Supplementary Notes on the Profound Meaning says, 「唯此經〈空品〉明於圓空,即先觀生空、次觀法空。」—“Only this sūtra’s ‘Emptiness’ chapter clarifies perfect emptiness: first contemplating person-emptiness, then contemplating dharma-emptiness” (T39n1784 0032c09–c10). It also says, 「此品圓譚,即空假中蕩三惑著,名畢竟空,導成懺讚二種之用。」—“This chapter speaks perfectly: emptiness, the provisional, and the middle sweep away attachment through the three delusions; this is called ultimate emptiness and guides the accomplishment of the two functions of repentance and praise” (0044c18–c19). These are Tiantai readings on the profound-meaning level and are not relabeled as line-by-line commentary on Yijing’s recension.
The three commentators differ in their readings of the chapter’s reason for coming, its overall outline, faculties, objects, and consciousness, ignorance, nectar, and the practice of giving. The differences arise both from differences in their base texts and stanza counts and from their distinct modes of outlining. This edition identifies the textual basis and original statement of each without melting the many masters into a single doctrine of emptiness.
V. Terminology
Emptiness. The title says “Reaffirming Emptiness,” while the opening prose says that emptiness is again clarified. The sūtra discloses emptiness passage by passage through the body, faculties, objects, consciousness, four great elements, ignorance, dependent arising, and five aggregates. Huizhao then explains the title through three meanings: emptiness itself as nature, the nature of emptiness, and the other-dependent as the nature of non-arising; he also says that only the two attachments are emptied, while the other-dependent and perfectly-accomplished are not emptied. The sūtra and commentary remain distinct layers.
Shunruo and shunruoduo. Huizhao transmits the ancient masters’ sound-forms: 「若云舜若空即是性,云舜若多即空之性」—“If one says shunruo, emptiness itself is nature; if one says shunruoduo, it is the nature of emptiness” (T39n1788 0272c13–c14). The ancient Chinese sound-forms and their contextual explanations are preserved; no reconstructed letter-form is independently supplied.
Empty aggregate and six thieves. The sūtra says that the body is like an empty aggregate and that the six thieves depend upon it. Huizhao both explains the body through the instability of a mass of foam and reads “empty aggregate” as conditioned, false, and devoid of qualities; because the six faculties and six objects can serve as conditions that damage wholesome qualities, they are called thieves. The empty aggregate is not a haunt for external spirits, nor do the six thieves form a separate substantial entity apart from faculties and objects.
Non-arising. The sūtra says of the great elements 「本非實有體無生」—“Originally not truly existent, their substance is unarisen” (T16n0665 0424b26). Huizhao explains, 「皆從緣起,無自然生,故云無生。」—“All arise from conditions and have no spontaneous arising; therefore they are called unarisen” (T39n1788 0274c17–c18). Conditioned arising and the absence of spontaneous arising are both preserved here; non-arising is not turned into a denial of every dependently arisen appearance.
Ignorance. The sūtra says both 「無明自性本是無」—“the self-nature of ignorance is originally absent” and 「藉眾緣力和合有」—“through the power of many conditions, it exists in conjunction” (T16n0665 0424b28), then says it is named ignorance because right wisdom has been lost. Huizhao explains that it is not born from a spiritual self or an inherent nature but exists only through many conditions; Jizang separately reads it through suchness as pure mind and the simile of water and waves. Each explanation remains attached to its own master and does not replace another.
Non-dispersal emptiness. This name occurs only in Huizhao’s outline. His commentary assigns the stanza beginning 「我斷一切諸煩惱」—“I have severed all afflictions” (T16n0665 0424c05) to non-dispersal emptiness and explains its operation as abandoning neither saṃsāra nor nirvāṇa. The sūtra itself does not separately label this kind of emptiness.
Intrinsic-nature emptiness and original-nature emptiness. Huizhao’s general outline says “intrinsic-nature emptiness,” while the line-by-line explanation of the nectar stanza says “original-nature emptiness.” Both original wordings remain where they occur; one term is not normalized into the other.
The two emptinesses of persons and dharmas. Following Dharmakṣema’s recension, Zhiyi divides both object and contemplation into person-emptiness and dharma-emptiness. This is a Tiantai line-by-line outline; it is not transferred into Huizhao’s scheme of eight emptinesses or presented as a list explicitly stated by Yijing’s sūtra text.
Nectar. Yijing’s recension has a city gate, vessel, true taste, and giving to the multitude of beings. The older recension additionally has a gate, vessel, city, chamber, and taste. Huizhao, Zhiyi, and Jizang correlate these differently. Whenever nectar is correlated with nirvāṇa, buddha-nature as practice, stages, or the three wisdoms of hearing, reflection, and cultivation, the explanation is explicitly identified as an ancient master’s judgment.
VI. Similes · Rhetoric
Empty aggregate and six thieves. The sūtra describes the body as an empty aggregate and the six objects as thieves apportioned among the faculties. The simile first loosens the intuition that “there is one ruler within the body,” then examines faculty by faculty, object by object, and consciousness by consciousness how each takes its own sphere as a condition while remaining mutually unaware.
Illusion and the bird simile. Yijing’s recension calls consciousness an illusion and says that mind-consciousness follows conditions and ranges throughout the six faculties 「如鳥飛空無障礙」—“like a bird flying unobstructed through the sky” (T16n0665 0424b10). Dharmakṣema’s recension instead says 「如鳥投網」—“like a bird entering a net” (T16n0663 0340a25). The two images move in different directions, and the commentators each explain the recension they follow. They are not flattened for the sake of symmetry.
Mechanical wooden figure and four snakes in one box. The sūtra says that the body is not-knowing and has no agent, like a mechanism moved by karma; it also compares earth, water, fire, and wind to four venomous snakes sharing a single box, constituting one body while their natures sink or lift and conflict with one another. “Mechanism” refers to a mechanical wooden figure, not an institution. Nor is a modern physical explanation added to the snakes’ sinking and lifting.
A corpse grove like rotten wood. After illness and death, the sūtra directly describes excrement and urine flowing out, pus and decay, worms and maggots, and the body discarded in a corpse grove. These concrete signs of impurity counter the perception of the body as delightful; the forms explicitly named by the sūtra are not removed through euphemism.
Floating and insubstantial. The sūtra says that the great elements are empty in nature and should be known as floating and insubstantial, not truly existent. Huizhao explains this with the simile of floating foam. The image points to conditioned arising without real substance; “floating and insubstantial” is not misread as floating empty space.
Nectar, Dharma-drum, Dharma-conch, bright lamp, and Dharma-rain. After contemplating emptiness, the sūtra uses five images of benefiting beings in succession: nectar removes heat, drum and conch proclaim Dharma, a bright lamp illuminates darkness, and Dharma-rain moistens and benefits. The masters correlate the four images of Dharma activity differently. Their readings are set out under the preceding topic and are not blended into something the sūtra itself says.
The four snakes and the four forms of Dharma activity echo across the chapter. The four snakes sharing a box in the first half portray conflict within the body; the Dharma-drum, Dharma-conch, bright lamp, and Dharma-rain in the latter half portray acts that benefit beings. The chapter’s rhetoric moves from dismantling the aggregate of the body to opening a gate, giving true taste, proclaiming Dharma, and rescuing beings. It does not stop with negation.
Measuring by particles. The last five stanzas first reduce the vegetation of a trichiliocosm to fine particles, extend the measure to all lands throughout the ten directions, and then imagine the wisdom of all sentient beings gathered into one person. Even if one could know the number of the particles in this way, one still could not calculate the smallest part of a single thought of the Muni’s wisdom. The comparison applies precisely to the smallest part of the wisdom of one thought; it is not generalized into a claim that everything is unknowable.
VII. Cross-Reading · Carrying Forward
Carrying forward from “The Golden-Victory Dhāraṇī.” The preceding chapter closes with 「既稱心已,常持莫忘」—“Once the wish has been fulfilled, constantly uphold it and do not forget” (T16n0665 0424a18). The present chapter immediately begins, 「爾時,世尊說此呪已」—“At that time, after the World-Honored One had spoken this formula” (0424a20). The verses on emptiness are not an unrelated new subject following the upholding of the dhāraṇī. The sūtra itself explicitly connects them through “after he had spoken this formula.”
From practice into its object. The preceding chapter entrusts the practitioner with recitation of names, veneration, upholding the formula, repentance, and a ritual sequence. This chapter contemplates body, faculties, objects, consciousness, the four great elements, and dependent arising. Huizhao explains this chapter order by saying that great-vehicle practice must arise in dependence on an object, and the object is therefore clarified here. This is the commentator’s account of the transition and is not passed off as a sentence from the sūtra.
Emptiness does not cut off practice. The chapter moves from contemplation of emptiness through severing afflictions, seeking awakening, giving nectar, sounding the Dharma-drum, honoring buddhas and maintaining ethical discipline, practicing giving and all the perfections, and realizing right awakening on the ten grounds. The sūtra’s own verse sequence already joins emptiness with benefiting beings and cultivation. There is no need to invent a fixed causal claim that “practice begins only after emptiness.”
Carrying forward into “Fulfilling Vows through Emptiness.” The end of this chapter records that the assembly correctly cultivates release and upholds the teaching as spoken. The next chapter title immediately appears at 0425a06, and the goddess Radiant Wish-Fulfilling Jewel asks about 「甚深理修行之法」—“the method of cultivation according to the profound principle” (0425a10). The object of emptiness contemplated here becomes, in the next chapter, a question about cultivating in accordance with profound principle. This records only the succession of the neighboring chapter texts and does not answer the next chapter in advance.
Through this Carrying Forward, the chapter stands between “upholding the Dharma” and “arousing practice through emptiness.” It first carries forward from the formula already spoken, places body and mind and their world within the contemplation of emptiness, then unfolds through the sūtra’s own words into severing afflictions, benefiting beings, the perfections, and right awakening, before handing the reader to the next chapter’s question about practice. Emptiness does not erase what comes before or after. It is the object of contemplation reaffirmed by this sūtra between them.
VIII. Placement of the Editions
- This translation and annotation uses Yijing’s T16n0665 as its base text. The translator attribution for fascicle five appears at 0422b26, the chapter title at 0424a19, the chapter body at 0424a20–0425a05, and the next chapter title at 0425a06. The chapter body contains sixty-six verse lines, with every two lines forming one stanza, for thirty-three stanzas in all.
- Dharmakṣema’s T16n0663 is titled “Emptiness,” Chapter 5, with verse text at 0340a08–c09. Baogui’s composite T16n0664 is titled “Emptiness,” Chapter 8, with verse text at 0379b08–0380a15. Yijing’s recension is titled “Reaffirming Emptiness,” Chapter 9. All three recensions contain a corresponding chapter text.
- There are eleven non-punctuation character differences between the first sixty verse lines of T663 and the first sixty of T664; all have been listed under Topic II. T664 also adds six verse lines, transcribed there in full line by line. It would be improper either to cite only examples while claiming a complete collation or silently to alter one witness with another.
- Each of the sixty verse lines in T663 contains three four-character phrases and is counted by the ancient commentary as forty-five stanzas. The first sixty lines in T664 preserve the same form, while its last six lines change to paired seven-character phrases. All sixty-six lines in T665 consist of paired seven-character phrases, forming thirty-three stanzas. The same number of verse lines does not entail the same number of stanzas.
- T663 lacks the final comparison to buddha-wisdom; T664 and T665 have corresponding content nodes. T665 additionally contains the opening prose carrying forward from the formula and a prose benefit passage at the end. Each recension’s degree of elaboration is kept with that recension; conclusions about textual origin do not replace the positive textual facts.
- Huizhao’s principal commentary in T39n1788 extends through 0272b28–0276b15; Zhiyi’s principal commentary in T39n1785 extends through 0066a18–0073a21; Jizang’s principal commentary in T39n1787 extends through 0165a16–0166a11. Zhiyi’s Profound Meaning and Zhili’s Supplementary Notes on the Profound Meaning serve only as evidence from the profound-meaning layer.
- Huizhao’s general outline says “intrinsic-nature emptiness,” while the line-by-line explanation says “original-nature emptiness.” His half stanza also preserves both an assignment to ultimate emptiness and a reading that concludes the preceding no-self. These original terms and alternate outlines within one commentary are all retained without normalization.
- The apparatus for this chapter uses only the texts of the three recensions and transmitted works of ancient masters including Huizhao, Zhiyi, Jizang, and Zhili. Fascicle and chapter numbers, attributions, chapter boundaries, stanza counts, variants, and commentary boundaries are each tied to their sources so that readers can return to the canonical texts and verify them.
All three recensions transmit an emptiness chapter, and the three masters each read it line by line through their own base text and outline. The task of collation is not to choose a single tidy voice for them, but to preserve their corresponding content nodes, differing characters, degrees of elaboration, and distinct interpretations of emptiness. By placing those differences side by side, both the sūtra’s arc from the empty aggregate and conditioned arising to benefiting beings and buddha-wisdom, and the ancient masters’ separate readings, remain visible in their proper layers.