妙法蓮華經玄義 三法妙

〔T33 0741b07〕
心要Essence

若把真性、觀照、資成想成三件工具,就會追問先得哪一件、後修哪一件;若只說它們是一,又容易把修行說成甚麼都不必做。三法妙同時鬆開這兩種執著:三不固定為三,一也不固定為一。真性是所依,觀照是明照,資成是眾行;三者不相混亂,也從未彼此分離。

所以,三軌並不躲在煩惱、業與苦之外。無明像冰,明像水;冰融不是從別處取水。惡如竹中火性,遇緣成火,又能燒竹;善也從可翻轉的惡中成事,再回頭破惡。苦道如把南方誤認成北方;方向雖迷,真正的南方並未消失。修行不是逃離另一種材料,而是使迷失的當下被照見、被轉開。

大車的譬喻把這件事說得最完整。法身是車體,般若與解脫是莊嚴和眾具;如來藏顯車之廣,第一義空顯車之高。白牛無染、多力、平正、疾走如風。車體、寶飾與白牛共同成車,不可拆成三輛,也不可因說同一輛車便抹去各自作用。

三道、三識、三佛性、三般若、三菩提、三大乘、三身、三涅槃、一體三寶、三德,看來名稱很多,其實是一條從輪迴走到祕密藏的路。名稱隨所教之人而變:有人要先建立正見,有人要生長善根,有人要對治惑病,有人可以直入第一義。千車可以同轍,法門不必同名。

三法妙的心要,因此不是把粗法丟掉,再換一套妙法。家中本有寶藏,只因全家不知而未能受用;開顯,是耘除草穢,使藏金顯露。凡夫一念已具三法,修行使幽隱者彰明;到究竟時,仍是同一三法不縱不橫。從這裏看,所謂半如意珠不是只得半個真理,而是自行的因果已經圓滿,慈悲運載眾生的路正要繼續展開。

Where are the three tracks to buddhahood to be found? If true nature, contemplative illumination, and supporting accomplishment are imagined as three tools, one will ask which must first be obtained and which cultivated later. Yet if one says only that they are one, practice can easily be made to sound as though nothing need be done. The subtlety of the three dharmas releases both attachments at once: three are not fixed as three, and one is not fixed as one. True nature is what one relies upon, contemplative illumination is lucid seeing, and supporting accomplishment is the multitude of practices. The three are not confused with one another, yet they have never been separate.

Thus, the three tracks do not hide outside affliction, karma, and suffering. Ignorance is like ice and illumination like water; when ice melts, water is not fetched from somewhere else. Evil is like the potential for fire within bamboo: when conditions meet, fire arises and then burns the bamboo; good likewise takes concrete form from evil that can be transformed and turns back to break evil. The path of suffering is like mistaking south for north: although the direction is misapprehended, the true south has not disappeared. Practice does not flee to some other kind of material. It lets the very place of delusion be seen and opened through.

The simile of the great cart expresses this most completely. The Dharma-body is the body of the cart, while prajñā and liberation are its adornments and equipment. The tathāgata-garbha reveals the cart’s breadth, and the emptiness of ultimate meaning reveals its height. The great white ox is unstained, powerful, even in its gait, and swift as the wind. The body of the cart, its jeweled adornments, and the white ox together make one cart. They cannot be split into three carts, nor can their distinct functions be erased merely because one speaks of a single cart.

The three paths, three consciousnesses, three buddha-natures, three prajñās, three bodhis, three Great Vehicles, three bodies, three nirvāṇas, the Three Jewels in one substance, and three virtues may look like many different names, but they form one road from saṃsāra to the secret treasury. The names change according to those being taught: some first need to establish right understanding, some to make wholesome roots grow, some to counteract the illness of delusion, and some can enter ultimate meaning directly. A thousand carts can follow the same track; Dharma gates need not bear the same name.

The heart of the subtlety of the three dharmas is therefore not to discard coarse dharmas and exchange them for a new set of wondrous dharmas. The treasure has always been in the house, but the whole family did not know and so could not use it. Opening and revealing means clearing away the weeds so that the hidden gold appears. An ordinary person’s single thought already possesses the three dharmas; practice makes what was concealed become manifest. At the ultimate, they remain the same three dharmas, neither vertical nor horizontal. Seen from here, the “half wish-fulfilling jewel” does not mean that only half of truth has been obtained. It means that the cause and fruit of self-practice have been brought to completion, while the compassionate work of carrying sentient beings is about to unfold.

原典Canonical · verbatim

隋天台智者大師說《妙法蓮華經玄義》〔私記緣起=沙門灌頂述〕· 大正藏 T33n1716〔起 T33 0741b07〕。段/行首〔T33 …〕=大正藏頁·欄·行錨(換頁一枚)。

〔T33 0741b07〕○第五、三法妙者,斯乃妙位所住之法也。言三法者,即三軌也。軌名軌範,還是三法可軌範耳。此即七意:一、總明三軌。二、歷別明三軌。三、判麁妙。四、開麁顯妙。五、明始終。六、類三法。七、悉檀料簡。 一、總明三軌者:一、真性軌。二、觀照軌。三、資成軌。名雖有三,秖是一大乘法也。經曰:「十方諦求,更無餘乘,唯一佛乘」。一佛乘即具三法,亦名第一義諦,亦名第一義空,亦名如來藏。此三不定三,三而論一。一不定一,一而論三,不可思議,不並不別,伊字、天目。故《大經》云:「佛性者,亦一、非一、非一非非一。亦一者,一切眾生悉一乘故。」此語第一義諦。「非一者,如是數法故。」此語如來藏。「非一非非一,數、非數法,不決定故。」此語第一義空。而皆稱亦者,鄭重也。秖是一法,亦名三耳。故不可單取,不可複取,不縱不橫,而三而一。 前明諸諦,若開、若合,若麁、若妙等,已是真性軌相也。前明諸智,若開、若合,若麁、若妙,是觀照軌相也。前明諸行,若開、若合,若麁、若妙,已是資成軌相也。前明諸位,秖是修此三法所證之果耳。若然,何以重說?重說有三義:一者、前境、智、行,是因中所乘之三軌。今明乘是大乘,已至道場,證果所住之三軌也。二者、前作境、智等名別說,今作法名合說。三者、前直爾散說,不論本末。今遠論其本,即是性德三軌,亦名如來之藏;極論其末,即是修德三軌,亦名祕密藏。本末含藏一切諸法。從性德之三法,起名字之三法;因名字之三法,修觀行之三法;因觀行之三法,發相似之三法;乃至分證之三法,究竟之三法。自成三法化他三法,為是義故,宜應重說也。 私謂一句即三句,三句即一句,名圓佛乘。記中既從如來藏一句出諸方便,此乃別判,例應通開。非一者,數法故。指此為如來藏,開出三藏中三乘事相方便。非一非非一,不決定故。指此一句,為第一義空,開出通教三人即事而真。亦一者,一切眾生悉一乘故。指此一句,為第一義諦,開出別教獨菩薩乘。此諸方便,悉從圓出。故經言:「於一佛乘,分別說三。」即此義也。 二、歷別明三法者,先須識如來開、合方便,然後乃解總攬三法為一大乘也。佛從何法開諸權乘?如《大經》明佛性非一,如是數法,說三乘故。當知,諸乘數法,為如來藏所攝。佛於此藏,開出聲聞、緣覺,及諸菩薩通、別等乘。何者?諸乘既是方便,如來藏又是事,從事出方便,故言諸權為如來藏攝耳。又依經故,《大經》云:「聲聞僧者,名有為僧。」又云:「六波羅蜜福德莊嚴。」又云:「聲聞之人,定力多故,不見佛性。」當知,定力即是福德,福德秖是有為。《勝鬘》稱為有漏。例如:界內見、思未破,為有起作,故名有為;取理不當,故名有漏;非智慧法,故名福德。今以下望上,亦應如是。二乘未破變易,猶是有為;無明未脫,故言有漏;非中道智,故名福德。以是故知,方便諸乘悉為資成所攝,皆從大乘一句偏出,非究竟法,故云「於一佛乘,分別說三。」即此意也。亦是於一佛乘,分別說五;亦是分別說七;亦是分別說九。若依此釋,如來藏句,開出種種方便、諸權乘法也。 〔T33 0742a08〕次、歷四教各論三法者,三藏中,以無為智慧,名觀照軌。正為乘體,助道成乘具,名資成軌。正、助之乘,斷惑入真,真是真性軌。教來詮此,故以教為乘也。緣覺亦爾,菩薩以無常觀為觀照;功德肥為資成;坐道場斷結、見真為真性。此教詮真,乘是教乘,從三界中出,到薩婆若中住,言教已盡,故無教乘。真不能運,故證非乘,故有索車之意〔云云〕。 二、通教,以真性軌為乘體。何以故?即色是空,事中有理,此理即真,故為乘體。以即空慧為觀照,眾行為資成。此教詮真,乘是教乘,從三界出,到薩婆若中住。菩薩出三界已,用行為乘,淨佛國土,教化眾生,乃至道場,乃可名住。亦是有教無人。無誰住者,亦是教謝證寂,無復運義,亦有索車之意〔云云〕。 三、明別教三法者,以緣修觀照為乘體,諸行是資成,以此二法為緣修智慧。慧能破惑顯理,理不能破惑,理若破惑,一切眾生悉具理性,何故不破?若得此慧,則能破惑,故用智為乘體。故《大經》云:「無為無漏,名菩薩僧。即是一地、二地,乃至十地智慧,名智慧莊嚴。」以此智慧運通十地,故為乘體。然《攝大乘》明三種乘:理乘、隨乘、得乘。理者,即是道前真如。隨者,即是觀真如,慧隨順於境。得者,一切行願熏習,熏無分別智,契無分別境,與真如相應。此三意,一往乃同於三軌,而前後未融。何者?九識是道後真如,真如無事,智行根本種子皆在梨耶識中熏習成就,得無分別智光,成真實性。是則理乘本有,隨得今有,道後真如方能化物。此豈非縱義?若三乘悉為黎耶所攝,又是橫義,又濫冥初生覺。既縱既橫,與真伊相乖。元夫如來初出,便欲說實;為不堪者,先以無常遣倒,次用空淨蕩著,次用歷別起心,然後方明常樂我淨。龍樹作論,申佛此意,以不可得空洗蕩封著,習應一切法空,是名與般若相應。此空豈不空於無明?無明若空,種子安在?淨諸法已,點空說法,結四句相。此語虛玄,亦無住著。如病除已,乃可進食,食亦消化。那得發頭據阿黎耶出一切法?本之見慢,全自未降,封此新文,若長氷添水。故知,彼論非逗末代重著眾生,乃是界外一途法門耳。又,阿黎耶若具一切法者,那得不具道後真如?若言具者,那言真如非第八識?恐此猶是方便,從如來藏中開出耳。若執方便,巨妨真實。若是實者,執之又成語見,多含兒蘇,恐將夭命〔云云〕。若能善解破立之意,於諸經論,淨無滯著也。 四、明圓教三法者,以真性軌為乘體。不偽名真,不改名性,即正因常住,諸佛所師,謂此法也。一切眾生亦悉一乘,眾生即涅槃相,不可復滅;涅槃即生死,無滅不生。故《大品》云:「是乘不動、不出。」即此乘也。 觀照者,秖點真性,寂而常照,便是觀照,即是第一義空。資成者,秖點真性法界,含藏諸行,無量眾具,即如來藏。三法不一異,如點如意珠中論光、論寶,光、寶不與珠一,不與珠異,不縱不橫。三法亦如是,亦一、亦非一,亦非一非非一,不可思議之三法也。若迷此三法,即成三障:一者、界內、界外塵沙,障如來藏。二者、通別見思,障第一義空。三者、根本無明,障第一義理。若即塵沙障達無量法門者,即資成軌得顯。若即見思障達第一義空者,觀照軌得顯。若即無明障達第一義諦者,真性軌得顯。真性軌得顯,名為法身。觀照得顯,名為般若。資成得顯,名為解脫。此兩即是定慧莊嚴,莊嚴法身。法身是乘體,定慧是眾具。下文云:「其車高廣,眾寶莊校。」是名圓教行人所乘之乘,到薩婆若,過茶無字可說。無字可說,亦應無乘可運。若自行運畢,乘義則休。若權化未畢,運他不休。故文云:「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」即其義也。譬如御者,運車達到,猶名為車。果乘亦爾,猶名為運。 復次,何必一向以運義釋乘?若取真性,不動、不出,則非運非不運。若取觀照、資成,能動、能出,則名為運。秖動出即不動出;即不動出是動出。即用而論體,動出是不動出;即體而論用,即不動出是動出。體用不二而二耳。例如:轉、不轉,皆阿鞞跋致;動、不動,皆是毘尼。以是義故,發趣、不發趣,皆名為乘也〔云云〕。 〔T33 0743a02〕三、明麁妙者,三藏於有為福德,論三法為乘。四念處是聞慧,乘於教乘,到四善根。四善根乘於行乘,到見諦。見諦乘於證乘,到無學。既是權法,出三界外,以真為證。證則不運、不見實乘。嗚呼自責,欲問世尊,為失、為不失?即此意也。半字漸引,非究竟義,是故三法皆麁也。通教即空慧,三法為乘巧,餘意大同。乾慧地乘於教乘,性地乘於行乘,八人見地乘於證乘。此亦偏說,是故為麁。別教以資成資於觀照,觀照開於真性,三法為乘。十信乘教、十住乘行、十地乘證,到妙覺薩婆若中住。緣,修成即謝,唯真修在。若爾,資成在前,觀照居次,真性在後。此三豎別,縱非大乘,此三並異,橫非大乘,是方便法,是故為麁也。 圓教點實相為第一義空,名空為縱。第一義空即是實相,實相不縱,此空豈縱?點實相為如來藏,名之為橫。如來藏即實相,實相不橫,此藏豈橫?故不可以縱思、不可以橫思,故名不可思議法,即是妙也。秖點空、藏為實相,空縱、藏橫,實相那不縱橫?秖點空為如來藏,空既不橫,藏那得橫?點如來藏為空,藏既不縱,空那得縱?點實相為空、藏,實相非縱非橫,空、藏亦非縱非橫,宛轉相即,不可思議,故名為妙。秖點如來藏為廣,點第一義空為高,故言其車高廣。如來藏即實相,故其車非廣。第一義空即實相,故其車非高。秖實相是空,那得非高?秖實相是如來藏,那得非廣?又點實相為如來藏,故言眾寶莊校,又多僕從而侍衛之。點實相為第一義空,故言有大白牛,肥壯多力,行步平正,其疾如風,智慧無染,名為白。能破惑,故名多力。中道慧,名平正。入無功用,故其疾如風。不思議三法,共成大車,豈有縱橫並別之異? 如是教乘,不縱不橫,五品所乘,到於似解。如是行乘,不縱不橫,似解所乘,到於十住。如是證乘,不縱不橫,十住所乘,到於妙覺薩婆若中住,故名妙乘。又云:「是乘微妙,清淨第一。」故瓦官建講,人夢聽者駕乘闐門而出;彼處建講,人夢黃衣滿路。以相則之,邪正明矣! 若將此麁妙等乘,約五味者,乳教一麁一妙。酪教一麁。生蘇三麁一妙。熟蘇二麁一妙。眾經悉帶縱橫方便,說不縱、不橫之真實,故言為麁。今經正直捨方便,故加之以妙〔云云〕。 四、開麁顯妙者,約《大經》三句也。經言:「佛性亦一」者,一切眾生悉一乘故。此是不動、不出之一乘,故具足三法,不縱、不橫。夫有心者皆備此理,而其家大小都無知者,是故為麁。今示眾生諸覺寶藏,耘除草穢,開顯藏金。一切無礙人,一道出生死。十方諦求,更無餘乘,唯一佛乘,是故為妙。經言:「佛性亦非一非非一。」數、非數法,不決定故。若執緣修智慧,定能顯理;慧自非理,則照用不明,不見佛性,是故為麁。今開定執之慧,即不決定慧,即慧而理、即理而慧,不執著數,定三定一,不著非數,非三非一,如此乃名無著妙慧。能破一切定相及不定相,亦無能破、所破。如輪王能破能安,如日除闇生物,如醫除膜養珠,即是大乘不縱不橫之妙慧也。經言:「佛性亦非一」說三乘故。即是三乘、五乘、七乘等諸方便乘。若住諸乘,但是事善,及以偏真,通入處近,是故為麁。今若決了諸乘即是如來藏,藏名佛性。從人天善乃至別乘,皆不動本法,即是於妙。當知,三句攝一切法,無非佛性,悉皆是妙。無麁可待,即絕待妙也。 五、明始終者,不取五品教乘為始,乃取凡地一念之心,具十法界、十種相性,為三法之始。何者?十種相性秖是三軌。如是體即真性軌;如是性,性以據內,即是觀照軌;如是相者,相以據外,即是福德,是資成軌。力者是了因,是觀照軌;作者是萬行精勤,即是資成;因者是習因,屬觀照。緣者是報因,屬資成;果者是習果,屬觀照;報者是習報,屬資成。本末等者,空等,即觀照;假等即資成;中等即真性。直就一界十如論於三軌。今但明凡心一念,即皆具十法界,一一界悉有煩惱性相、惡業性相、苦道性相。若有無明煩惱性相,即是智慧觀照性相。何者?以迷明故起無明。若解無明,即是於明。《大經》云:「無明轉,即變為明。」《淨名》云:「無明即是明。」當知,不離無明而有於明,如氷是水,如水是氷。 又凡夫心,一念即具十界,悉有惡業性相,秖惡性相即善性相,由惡有善,離惡無善,翻於諸惡,即善資成。如竹中有火性,未即是火事,故有而不燒,遇緣事成,即能燒物。惡即善性,未即是事。遇緣成事,即能翻惡。如竹有火,火出還燒竹。惡中有善,善成還破惡。故即惡性相是善性相也。凡夫一念,皆有十界識、名色等苦道性相。迷此苦道,生死浩然,此是迷法身為苦道,不離苦道別有法身。如迷南為北,無別南也。若悟生死,即是法身,故云:苦道性相即是法身性相也。 〔T33 0744a07〕夫有心者,皆有三道性相,即是三軌性相。故《淨名》云:「煩惱之儔,為如來種。」此之謂也。若言如是力、如是作者,菩提心發也,即是真性等萌動。如是因者,即是觀照萌動。如是緣者,即是資成萌動。如是果者,由觀照萌動,成習因,感得般若習果滿也。如是報者,由資成萌動,為緣因,感得解脫報果滿也。果報滿故,法身亦滿,是為三德究竟滿,名祕密藏。本末等者,性德三軌,冥伏不縱、不橫;修德三軌,彰顯不縱、不橫。冥伏如等、數等、妙等;彰顯如等、數等、妙等,故言等也。亦是空等、假等、中等〔云云〕。 六、類通三法者,前以三軌之法,從始以至終,即是豎通無礙。今欲橫通諸法,悉使無礙,類通諸三法。何者?赴緣名異,得意義同,粗通十條,餘者可領。三道、三識、三佛性、三般若、三菩提、三大乘、三身、三涅槃、三寶、三德。諸三法無量,止用十者,舉其大要,明始終耳。三道輪迴,生死本法,故為初。若欲逆生死流,須解三識、知三佛性、起三智慧、發三菩提心、行三大乘、證三身、成三涅槃,是三寶,利益一切,化緣盡,入於三德,住祕密藏〔云云〕。 一、類通三道者:真性軌即苦道;觀照軌即煩惱道;資成軌即業道。苦道即真性者,下文云:「世間相常住」,豈不即彼生死而是法身耶?煩惱即觀照,觀照本照惑,無惑則無照,一切法空是也。文云:「諸法從本來,常自寂滅相。」即煩惱是觀照也。照如薪生火。文云:「於諸過去佛,若有聞一句,皆已成佛道。」又云:「深達罪福相,遍照於十方。」即是聞於體達煩惱之妙句也。資成即業道者,惡是善資,無惡亦無善。文云:「惡鬼入其心,罵詈毀辱我,我等念佛故,皆當忍是事。」惡不來加,不得用念,用念由於惡加〔云云〕。又威音王佛所著法之眾,聞不輕言,罵詈打拍;由惡業故,還值不輕,不輕教化,皆得不退。又提婆達多是善知識,豈非惡即資成?三軌即三道,是為理性,行於非道,通達佛道。五品,觀行行於非道,通達佛道。六根清淨,相似行於非道,通達佛道。十住去,即分真行於非道,通達佛道。妙覺,究竟行於非道,通達佛道〔云云〕。 二、類通三識者,菴摩羅識即真性軌;阿黎耶識即觀照軌;阿陀那識即資成軌。若地人明阿黎耶是真常淨識攝;大乘人云是無記、無明、隨眠之識,亦名無沒識,九識乃名淨識互諍〔云云〕。今例近況遠,如一人心復何定?為善則善識,為惡即惡識,不為善惡,即無記識。此三識,何容頓同水火?秖背善為惡,背惡為善,背善惡為無記。秖是一人三心耳。三識亦應如是,若阿黎耶中,有生死種子,熏習增長,即成分別識。若阿黎耶中,有智慧種子,聞熏習增長,即轉依成道後真如,名為淨識。若異此兩識,秖是阿黎耶識。此亦一法論三,三中論一耳。《攝論》云:「如金、土、染、淨。染譬六識;金譬淨識;土譬黎耶識。」明文在茲,何勞苦諍?下文譬如有人至親友家,醉酒而臥,豈非阿黎耶識?世間狂惑,分別之識起已遊行,以求衣食,豈非阿陀那識?聞熏種子稍起增長,會遇親友,示以衣珠,豈非菴摩羅識?菴摩羅識,名無分別智光。若黎耶中,有此智種子,即理性無分別智光。五品,觀行無分別智光。六根清淨,相似無分別智光。初住去,分真無分別智光。妙覺,究竟無分別智光。麁妙〔云云〕。 三、類通三佛性者,真性軌即是正因性;觀照軌即是了因性;資成軌即是緣因性。故下文云:「汝實我子;我實汝父。」即正因性。又云:「我昔教汝無上道故,一切智願猶在不失。」智即了因性,願即緣因性。又云:「我不敢輕於汝等,汝等皆當作佛。」即正因性。「是時四眾,以讀誦眾經」即了因性。「修諸功德」即緣因性。又云:「長者諸子,若十、二十,乃至三十。」此即三種佛性。又云:「種種性相義,我已悉知見。」既言種種性,即有三種佛性也。若知三軌即三佛性,是名理佛性。五品,觀行見佛性。六根,相似見佛性。十住至等覺,分真見佛性。妙覺,究竟見佛性。是故稱妙〔云云〕。 四、類通三般若者,真性是實相般若;觀照是觀照般若;資成是文字般若。具如上釋境、智、行三妙之相。故下文云:「止止不須說,我法妙難思。」又云:「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅。」即實相般若。「我及十方佛,乃能知是相。」「唯佛與佛,乃能究盡。」又云:「我所得智慧,微妙最第一。」即觀照般若。又云:「我常知眾生,行道不行道,隨應所可度,為說種種法。」若干言辭,隨宜方便,即是文字般若。又云:「如來知見廣大深遠。」廣大深遠即實相般若。如來知見稱廣大深遠,即觀照般若。若言方便、知見皆已具足,即文字般若。故知三軌亦三般若之異名耳。若三智在三心、屬三人,是則為麁。三智在一心中,不縱不橫,是則理妙。五品,觀行三般若。六根淨,相似三般若。四十心,分真三般若。妙覺,究竟三般若也。 〔T33 0745a11〕五、類通三菩提者,真性軌即實相菩提;觀照軌即實智菩提;資成軌方便菩提。故下文云:「我先不言汝等皆得阿耨三菩提。」「非實、非虛、非如、非異,不如三界,見於三界。」即實相菩提。「我成道已來,甚大久遠。」即實智菩提。「我說少出家,近伽耶城,得三菩提。」即方便菩提。若就弟子明三菩提者,「若我遇眾生,盡教以佛道。」即實相菩提。「安住實智中,我定當作佛。」又云:「佛子行道已,來世得作佛。」「乘是寶乘,直至道場。」即是修成實智菩提。授八相記,即方便菩提。不一異者,名之為如。不決了名麁,決了名為妙。一切眾生,理性菩提。五品,名字菩提。六根,相似菩提。四十一位,分真菩提。妙覺,究竟菩提〔云云〕。 六、類通三大乘者,真性即理乘;觀照即隨乘;資成即得乘。故下文云:「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴。」住大乘即理乘;定慧莊嚴即隨乘;所得法即得乘。「佛自住大乘」是理乘;「於道場知已」是隨乘;「導師方便說」是得乘。又「舍利弗!以本願故,說三乘法。」是得乘、隨乘。又,「是乘微妙清淨第一」是理乘。「於一佛乘」是理乘;「分別說三」是得乘、隨乘。不縱不橫妙,開麁妙、歷七位〔云云〕。五品,名字乘。六根,相似乘。四十一位,分真乘。妙覺,究竟乘〔云云〕。 七、類通三身者,真性軌即法身;觀照即報身;資成即應身。若《新金光明》云:「依於法身,得有報身;依於報身,得有應身。」此即如前所明,依於境妙,得有智妙;依於智妙,得有行妙。彼文云:「佛真法身,猶如虛空,應物現形,如水中月。」報身即天月。此文云:「佛自住大乘」即是實相之身,猶如虛空。「定慧力莊嚴」慧如天月,定如水月。又云:「唯佛與佛,乃能究盡諸法實相。」即是法身。「我所得智慧,微妙最第一。」即是報身。「名稱普聞」即是應身。又,非生、現生等,是應身也。或示己身,即法身、報身。或示他身,即報、應。「我以相嚴身,光明照十方,為說實相印。」實相印即法身;照十方即應身;相嚴身即報身。又「深達罪福相,遍照於十方。」即報身;「微妙淨法身」即法身;「具相三十二」即應身。三軌名異,義即三身,故《普賢觀》云:「佛三種身,從方等生。」《法界性論》云:「水銀和真金,能塗諸色像,功德和法身,處處應現往。」若此三身不縱不橫,妙決了三身入法身妙。歷七位妙〔云云〕。 八、類通三涅槃者,地人言:「但有性淨、方便淨。實相名為性淨涅槃;修因所成為方便淨涅槃。」今以理性為性淨涅槃,修因所成為圓淨涅槃,此則義便;薪盡火滅為方便淨涅槃,此文便。若將修因所成為方便涅槃者,以薪盡火滅為何等涅槃?故知應有三涅槃,三涅槃即是三軌。文云:「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅。」又云:「諸法從本來,常自寂滅相。」是性淨涅槃。又云:「皆以如來滅度而滅度之」即圓淨涅槃。又云:「我成佛已來,甚大久遠。」久修業所得,慧光照無量,亦是圓淨涅槃。數數唱生,處處現滅,於此夜滅度,如薪盡火滅,豈非方便淨涅槃?《大經》題稱「大般涅槃」,翻為大滅度。大者,其性廣博,即據性淨。度者,到於彼岸,智慧滿足,即據圓淨。滅者,煩惱永盡,斷德成就,即據方便淨。此三涅槃,即是三軌也。 九、類通一體三寶者,真性即法寶;觀照即佛寶;資成即僧寶。故法性不動名不覺;佛智契理,故佛名為覺。事和、理和,故僧名和合。《思益》云:「知覺名為佛;知離名為法;知無名為僧。」此是一體三寶。故下文云:「佛自住大乘」佛是佛寶;大乘是法寶;「如其所得法,以此度眾生。」即是與理和,復與眾生和,即是僧寶。「世間相常住」,名法寶;「於道場知已」,名佛寶;「導師方便說」上與理和,下與眾生和,名僧寶。一體三寶,非一之一,不三之三,此之三一,不縱不橫,稱之為妙。歷七位〔云云〕。 十、類通三德者,《大經》三德,共成大涅槃。此經三軌,共成大乘。彼明法身德,此云實相。彼云:「佛性者亦一」一切眾生悉一乘故,亦是指實相為一乘。彼處明般若德;此經明其智慧門難解難入。「我所得智慧,微妙最第一」乃至「決了聲聞法,是諸經之王」皆是般若。彼經明解脫德;此經明數數示現,現生現滅,隨所調伏眾生之處,自既無累,令他解脫,乃至收取萬善事中功德悉得證果,豈非解脫?二經義合,碌碌之徒,隨名異解,譬聞天帝,不識憍尸。唯知《涅槃》佛性之文,不見雙樹有一乘之旨。彼文親說佛性亦一,一即一乘。而人云:「此乃《涅槃》一乘是佛性,《法華》一乘非佛性。」若言《法華》不明佛性者,《涅槃》不應遙指云:「八千聲聞於法華中,得受記莂,如秋收冬藏,見如來性,更無所作。」而人云:「《涅槃》有遙指之文,此中無佛性之語。」今據此文:「種種性相義,而我皆已見。」既言種種,何獨簡於佛性耶?又,「世間相常住。於道場知已,導師方便說。」豈非佛性之文耶?《論》云:「佛性水常不輕。」知眾生有佛性。又《涅槃》三德為祕密藏。安置諸子祕密藏中,我亦不久當入其中,此即自他俱入祕密。此經云:「佛自住大乘,以此度眾生。終不以小乘濟度諸眾生,悉以如來滅度而滅度之。」如是自他俱入如來滅度。滅度秖是涅槃,涅槃秖是祕藏。《釋論》云:「《法華》為祕藏,兩經文義宛宛恒同。」何故諸人,苟欲抗異?若文義舛隔,作同想無罪,今文義本合,離之何福?但《涅槃》以佛性為宗,非不明一乘義;今經以一乘為宗,非不明佛性義。赴機異說,其義常通也。若三德縱橫即是麁;不縱橫即是妙。歷七位〔云云〕。 〔T33 0746a26〕七、悉檀料簡者。 問: 十種三法及餘一切皆是三軌者,唯應三軌,何意異說? 答: 眾生機宜不同,應隨機設逗,悉檀方便引接耳。隨俗故異,稱便宜故異,逐對治故異,令人入道故異。朝三暮四,撫眾狙而皆悅,苦塗水洗,養嬰兒以適時。善巧赴機,故方圓任物,譬千車而同轍,豈守一而疑諸? 今通用四悉檀,歷十法,論妙,不妙;具說三軌,共成大乘。大乘之中,備有三法及一切法,不相混亂,即是世界悉檀。資成資發智慧,以生善故,是為人悉檀。觀照破惑,諸惡滅故,是對治悉檀。真性實理,為第一義悉檀。一段眾生,宜以大乘名說,得四利益也。 備說三德為大涅槃。雖三點上下而無縱、表裏而無橫,一不相混,三不相離,即世界悉檀。善利殃釁不干,故得挺然累表,是故解脫即為人悉檀。般若如金剛,隨所擬皆碎,即是對治悉檀。法身即第一義也。一段眾生聞三德名,即獲四利矣!舉初、舉後、中間例然。 次、明妙不妙。《論》云:「三悉檀是世諦,心所行處,可破可壞。第一義悉檀,是心不行處,諸佛聖人心所得法,不可破壞,即是真諦。」若然者,比四悉檀為二諦所攝。更有中道,復云何攝?若不攝中,但是藏、通之意,此悉檀為麁。今言俗有、真無,是隔異法,便是三悉檀心所行處,可破可壞。中道第一義,非有、非無,有無不二則無隔異,無異即真諦。前三悉檀所通,止至化城,化城非實,故可破可壞,可壞為麁。今中道無異,又通至寶所,無能過、無能滅,故不可壞,稱之為妙。若餘經說中道第一義悉檀,與此經不殊。但餘經帶阿羅漢所得,為第一義悉檀,故不稱妙。此經正直捨方便,但有圓實四悉檀,是故為妙。若不決三悉檀入第一義,是復為麁;若決一一悉檀,皆有第一義者,是則為妙。 五品弟子,假名四悉檀。六根淨,相似四悉檀。初住至等覺,分真四悉檀。妙覺,究竟四悉檀,是故稱妙。 此五番明妙,從因至果,以辨自行妙,半如意珠竟。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

三法妙的來意與七門

第五是三法妙。這三法,是前面所說妙位之人證果後所安住的法。

所謂三法,就是三軌。『軌』有軌則、規範的意思;三法既可成為行人所依循的軌範,所以稱為三軌。這一大段分七門:第一總說三軌,第二逐一分別三軌,第三判定粗與妙,第四開顯粗法本來即妙,第五說明三法的開始與終極,第六以三軌會通各種三法,第七用四悉檀作問答辨析。

第一門:總明三軌

三軌是:第一真性軌,第二觀照軌,第三資成軌。名稱雖有三個,實際只是一種大乘法。

經文的意思是:從十方仔細尋求,再也沒有其他乘,只有一種佛乘。這一佛乘本身就具足三法,又可名為第一義諦、第一義空、如來藏。這三法不能固定看成三個彼此分開的法;正因不能固定成三,所以可由三而論一。這一法也不能固定看成一個單獨的法;正因不能固定成一,所以可由一而論三。這是不可思議的關係:三者既不平列並排,也不彼此隔別,如伊字三點,又如同一面上的三目。

所以《大般涅槃經》說佛性也是一、不是一、也不是一而又不是非一。說『也是一』,是因一切眾生全都同有一乘;這一句說第一義諦。說『不是一』,是因它可說為如是數法;這一句說如來藏。說『不是一而又不是非一』,是因數法與非數法都不能固定;這一句說第一義空。三句都加一個『也』字,是用鄭重語氣反覆申明。實際只是一法,也可有三個名稱。因此不可只取單一一面,也不可把幾面重疊成複合物;它既不前後縱列,也不左右橫排,而始終是三而一、一而三。

前面所明各種諦理,無論開說、合說,判粗、判妙,都已顯出真性軌之相。前面所明各種智慧,無論開合粗妙,都已顯出觀照軌之相。前面所明各種行,無論開合粗妙,都已顯出資成軌之相。前面所明各種位,只是修這三法而證得的果位。

既然前四妙已經說過,為何還要重說三法?有三個理由。

第一,前面境、智、行三妙,是因位行人所乘的三軌;如今說的大乘已到道場,是證果後所住的三軌。

第二,前面分別用境、智、行等不同名稱散開來說;現在統稱為法,把它們合在一起說。

第三,前面只是直接分散說明,沒有追論本與末;現在往最遠的根本說,就是性德三軌,也名如來之藏;說到最究竟的末端,就是修德三軌,也名祕密藏。本與末之間含藏一切法:由性德三法生起名字三法;依名字三法修觀行三法;由觀行三法發起相似三法;再到分證三法,最後到究竟三法。既可自行成就三法,也可以三法教化他人。正因有這三個理由,應當重說。

章安的附釋

記錄者章安在此補充說:一句當下就是三句,三句當下就是一句,這名為圓滿佛乘。所記大師的解釋既從如來藏一句開出種種方便,這只是分別的一面;依例也應把三句都通開。

『不是一,因為是數法』,指如來藏,從中開出三藏教的三乘事相方便。『不是一而又不是非一,因為數法與非數法不能固定』,指第一義空,從中開出通教三類行人即事而真的道路。『也是一,因為一切眾生全都同有一乘』,指第一義諦,從中開出別教單獨的菩薩乘。這些方便全由圓滿佛乘開出,所以經中說,在一佛乘中分別宣說三乘;意思就在這裏。

第二門:逐一分別三法

逐一分別以前,先須知道如來如何開出方便、又如何把方便合回一乘;懂得這種開合,才會明白如何總攝三法而成一大乘。

佛是從哪一法開出各種方便乘?《大般涅槃經》說佛性不是一,是因可說三乘。由此應知,各種有數量差別的乘,都被如來藏收攝。佛從這一藏中,開出聲聞、緣覺,以及菩薩的通、別等乘。

為何如此說?各種乘既是方便,如來藏在這一配屬中又屬於事;方便由事開出,所以說各種權乘都被如來藏收攝。

經文又提供三層根據。《大般涅槃經》說,聲聞僧名為有為僧;又說六波羅蜜是福德莊嚴;又說聲聞人定力多,所以不能見佛性。由此可知,定力屬福德,福德就是有為。譬如從三界以內說,見惑、思惑尚未破除,仍有造作,所以稱有為;取得的理不相應,所以稱有漏;它不是中道智慧,所以稱福德。現在由下位望上位,也應如此理解:二乘尚未破除變易生死,仍屬有為;尚未脫離無明,所以稱有漏;所得不是中道智,所以稱福德。

因此可知,各種方便乘都被資成軌收攝,都是從大乘一句中偏開出來,並非究竟法。經中說在一佛乘中分別說三,正是這個意思;也可說在一佛乘中分別說五、分別說七、分別說九。依這樣解釋,如來藏一句便開出種種方便與各種權乘之法。

三藏教的三法

接著依四種教門各說三法。

在三藏教中,以無為智慧名觀照軌,正作為所乘之體;助道法成為乘具,名資成軌;正乘與助乘斷惑而入真,所入之真就是真性軌。教法前來詮說這三項,所以把言教稱為乘。

緣覺也是如此。菩薩則以無常觀為觀照軌,以使功德充厚為資成軌,最後坐道場斷結、見真,作為真性軌。這一教前來詮真,所以是教乘;行人從三界中出離,住於薩婆若。到此言教的工作已盡,所以不再有教乘;所證之真本身不能繼續運載,所以證果也不再稱乘,因此便有向佛索求大車的意思。

通教的三法

通教以真性軌為乘體。為何?色法當下就是空,事中本來有理,這個理就是真,所以作為乘體。即空的智慧是觀照軌,各種行是資成軌。

這一教詮真,因而是教乘;行人從三界出離,到薩婆若中安住。菩薩出三界後,仍以行為乘,清淨佛國、教化眾生,直到道場才可稱為安住。這也可說只有教法,卻沒有一個固定的人住在所得中;言教退謝、所證歸寂以後,不再有運載之義,所以同樣有索求大車的意思。

別教的三法

別教以緣修觀照為乘體,各種行是資成軌;以觀照、資成二法作為緣修智慧。智慧能破惑、顯理,理本身不能破惑。若理自身便能破惑,一切眾生既都具足理性,為何不能自然破惑?行人得到這種智慧後才能破惑,所以用智慧作乘體。

因此《大般涅槃經》的意思是,無為無漏名菩薩僧;初地、二地直到十地的智慧名智慧莊嚴。以這種智慧運行通過十地,所以它是乘體。

然而,《攝大乘論》被說為明三種乘:理乘、隨乘、得乘。理乘是修道以前的真如;隨乘是觀真如的智慧,智慧隨順所觀境;得乘是以一切行願熏習無分別智,使無分別智契合無分別境而與真如相應。這三層乍看之下與三軌相同,前後卻尚未圓融。

問題在哪裏?九識被說成修道以後的真如,真如本身不涉事相,智慧與行的根本種子卻都在阿黎耶識中熏習成就,然後得到無分別智光而成真實性。這樣一來,理乘本來已有,隨乘與得乘現在才有,修道以後的真如最後才能教化眾生,豈不是前後縱列?若三乘又都被黎耶識收攝,便成左右橫排;而且還容易混同於冥初生覺。既縱又橫,便與真伊字的關係相違。

如來最初出世,本想直接宣說真實;因眾生不能承受,先用無常遣除顛倒,再用空與清淨洗蕩執著,再用歷別法門使心次第生起,最後才明常、樂、我、淨。龍樹造論申明佛的這一用意,先用不可得空洗去封執;行人習慣與一切法空相應,才名與般若相應。這個空難道不空掉無明嗎?無明若空,種子還安放在哪裏?諸法清淨以後,再依空而說法、結成四句,所說仍虛玄而不住著。就像疾病已除才可進食,吃下的食物也須消化。

怎能一開始便認定一切法都由阿黎耶識生出?原來的見與慢完全未降,又封執新學文字,只會像長冰再添水,使執著更厚。因此可知,這部論的教法不是專為末代執著深重的眾生而說,只是界外一條法門。

再問:阿黎耶識若具足一切法,怎會不具足修道以後的真如?若說它具足,又怎能說真如不是第八識?恐怕這仍是從如來藏開出的方便。若把方便執為究竟,會大大妨礙真實;即使所依是真實,執著它也會變成語言見解。這就像給嬰兒吃太多酥,恐怕會使嬰兒夭折。若能善解破與立的用意,面對各種經論便能清淨而沒有滯著。

圓教的三法

圓教以真性軌為乘體。不虛偽,所以名真;不改變,所以名性。它就是正因常住,是諸佛所尊奉的法。一切眾生也都同有一乘;眾生當下就是涅槃相,不可再滅,涅槃當下就是生死,沒有離開生死另立一個滅,也沒有離開涅槃另立一個生。所以《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》被引為:這一乘不動,也不出;這正是圓教之乘。

觀照軌只是就真性本身點出寂而常照的一面,也就是第一義空。資成軌只是就真性法界點出含藏諸行、具足無量助緣的一面,也就是如來藏。

三法既不完全相同,也不彼此相異,如同在如意珠中分說珠光與珠寶。光、寶與珠既不是同一名稱,又不離開珠而另有。三法也是如此:也是一,也不是一,也不是一而又不是非一,是不可思議的三法。

若迷失這三法,便成三障。第一,三界內外的塵沙障礙如來藏;第二,通教、別教所治的見思惑障礙第一義空;第三,根本無明障礙第一義理。

若就在塵沙障中通達無量法門,資成軌便顯露;若就在見思障中通達第一義空,觀照軌便顯露;若就在無明障中通達第一義諦,真性軌便顯露。真性軌顯露,名法身;觀照軌顯露,名般若;資成軌顯露,名解脫。觀照與資成就是定、慧莊嚴,用來莊嚴法身。法身是乘體,定慧是種種乘具。

經中說車身高廣,以眾寶莊嚴,正是這個意思。圓教行人乘這一乘到薩婆若,越過茶字便再無字可說。既無字可說,似乎也應沒有乘可運。若只說自行,運載完成後,乘的作用就暫止;若教化他人的工作尚未完成,運他便不停止。所以經意是,佛自己安住大乘,依祂所得之法,以定慧力莊嚴,用它度眾生。

譬如御者把車駕到目的地以後,那件工具仍名為車;果位上的乘也是如此,仍可名為運載。

再者,為何一定只用『運』解釋乘?若取真性來看,它不動也不出,既不能只說運,也不能只說不運。若取觀照、資成來看,它們能動、能出,所以名運。然而動出當下就是不動出,不動出當下也就是動出。由作用說本體,動出就是不動出;由本體說作用,不動出就是動出。體與用本來不二,卻可分成兩面來說。

例如,轉與不轉都可名阿鞞跋致,也就是不退轉;動與不動都可名毘尼,也就是調伏。依這個道理,發趣與不發趣都可稱為乘。

第三門:判定粗與妙

先說三藏教。它在有為福德中論三法為乘:四念處是聞慧,乘教乘到四善根;四善根乘行乘到見諦;見諦再乘證乘到無學。這是方便權法;出了三界,以真為證,證後便不能再運,也沒有見到真實大乘。行人於是哀歎自責,想問世尊自己究竟失去還是沒有失去。半字教只是逐漸引導,並非究竟,所以其中三法全都屬粗。

通教以即空智慧作三法之乘,方法較巧,其他意思大致相同。乾慧地乘教乘到性地;性地乘行乘到八人、見地;八人、見地乘證乘而進入所證。這仍是偏說,所以屬粗。

別教以資成幫助觀照,以觀照開顯真性,三法共同成乘。十信乘教,十住乘行,十地乘證,到妙覺薩婆若中安住。緣修成就後便退謝,只留下真修。若照這樣說,資成在前,觀照在中,真性在後,三者前後豎別,不能成大乘;三者又並列相異,左右橫隔,也不能成大乘。它仍是方便法,所以屬粗。

圓教直接就實相點為第一義空。若只看『空』字,好像落在前後縱列;然而第一義空當下就是實相,實相不縱,這個空怎會縱?又直接就實相點為如來藏。若只看『藏』字,好像落在左右橫排;然而如來藏當下就是實相,實相不橫,這個藏怎會橫?它不可用縱想,也不可用橫想,所以名不可思議法,也就是妙。

有人又反問:既把空與藏點為實相,空看似縱、藏看似橫,實相怎會不縱橫?回答須在相即中看。就空點成如來藏,空既不橫,藏怎會橫?就如來藏點成空,藏既不縱,空怎會縱?就實相點成空與藏,實相非縱非橫,空與藏也非縱非橫。三者反覆相即,不可思議,所以名妙。

就如來藏點出廣大,所以說大車高廣;就第一義空點出高遠,所以說車高而廣。如來藏就是實相,所以車不能固定說廣;第一義空就是實相,所以車不能固定說高。然而實相當下是空,怎會不高?實相當下是如來藏,怎會不廣?

又就實相點成如來藏,所以說眾寶莊校,又有許多僕從侍衛;就實相點成第一義空,所以說有大白牛,肥壯有力,行步平正,奔走快得像風。智慧沒有染污,所以名白;能破惑,所以名多力;中道智慧,所以名平正;進入無功用行,所以快得像風。不可思議三法共同成一輛大車,哪裏還有縱橫、並列、隔別的不同?

這種不縱不橫的教乘,由五品位行人所乘,到相似解;這種不縱不橫的行乘,由相似解所乘,到十住;這種不縱不橫的證乘,由十住所乘,到妙覺薩婆若中安住,所以名妙乘。經中又說這一乘微妙、清淨、第一。

因此,瓦官寺開講時,有人夢見聽眾駕乘車馬,塞滿門口而出;另一處開講時,有人夢見穿黃衣的人滿路。依這些徵相判斷,邪正已很分明。

再把各種粗妙乘依五味判別:乳味教一粗一妙;酪味教只有一粗;生酥味三粗一妙;熟酥味二粗一妙。其他經典都帶著縱橫方便來說不縱不橫的真實,因此方便一面稱粗;今經正直捨方便,所以特別加以妙名。

第四門:開粗而顯妙

開粗顯妙依《大般涅槃經》佛性三句說。

第一,經說佛性也是一,因為一切眾生全都同有一乘。這是不動不出的一乘,本來具足三法而不縱不橫。凡有心者全具這個理,卻像一家大小全不知道家中寶藏,所以稱粗。如今把覺悟的寶藏指示給眾生,耕除草穢,開顯藏金;一切無礙之人由同一道路出生死。從十方仔細尋求,再無其他乘,只有一佛乘,所以稱妙。

第二,經說佛性也不是一而又不是非一,因數法、非數法不能固定。若執著緣修智慧一定能顯理,而智慧本身又不是理,觀照作用便不明,也不能見佛性,所以稱粗。如今開啟這個固定執著的智慧,使它成為不固定的智慧:智慧當下是理,理當下是智慧;不執著數法,固定為三或固定為一;也不執著非數法,固定成非三非一。這才名無著妙慧。

這種智慧能破一切定相與不定相,也不再執著能破與所破。它像轉輪王能破亂又能安民,像太陽除暗又生養萬物,像醫師除去眼膜又養護眼珠。這就是大乘不縱不橫的妙慧。

第三,經說佛性也不是一,因而說三乘。這包括三乘、五乘、七乘等種種方便乘。若停住在這些乘中,所得只是事善與偏真,所入之處仍近,所以稱粗。如今若決了各種乘當下就是如來藏,藏又名佛性,從人天善直到別教菩薩乘,全都不改動原有法而當下入妙。

所以三句收攝一切法,沒有一法不是佛性,也沒有一法不是妙。既沒有另一個粗法可等待對治,便是超絕相待的妙。

第五門:三法的開始與終極

三法的開始,不取五品位的教乘,而取凡夫地一念心中具足十法界、每一法界各具十種如是,作為三法之始。

為何?十種如是正是三軌。如是體是真性軌;如是性依內在說,是觀照軌;如是相依外在說,是福德,也就是資成軌。如是力是了因,屬觀照軌;如是作是萬行精勤,屬資成軌;如是因是習因,屬觀照;如是緣是報因,屬資成;如是果是習果,屬觀照;如是報是習報,屬資成。如是本末究竟等中,空等屬觀照,假等屬資成,中等屬真性。這是先只就一個法界的十如而論三軌。

如今進一步說,凡夫一念就具足十法界;每一界都有煩惱的性與相、惡業的性與相、苦道的性與相。

若有無明煩惱的性相,當下就是智慧觀照的性相。為何?因迷失明,所以生無明;若理解無明,當下就是明。《大般涅槃經》的意思是,無明轉變就成為明;《維摩詰所說經》的意思是,無明本身就是明。由此可知,不可離開無明另找一個明,正如冰就是水、水就是冰。

凡夫一念所具十界,也全有惡業性相。惡的性相當下就是善的性相;因有惡才顯出善,離惡便沒有可翻轉的善,翻轉種種惡行就是善的資成。譬如竹中有火性,尚未成為實際火焰,所以雖有火性卻不燃燒;遇到因緣而成為火事,便能燒物。惡當下具善性,尚未成為善事;遇緣成事,便能翻轉惡。就像竹中出火,火又燒竹;惡中有善,善成以後又破惡。因此,惡的性相就是善的性相。

凡夫一念也具十界的識、名色等苦道性相。迷於這一苦道,生死便浩瀚無邊;這是把法身迷成苦道,並非離苦道另有法身。譬如把南方迷認為北方,此外並沒有另一個南方。若悟生死,生死當下就是法身,所以苦道性相就是法身性相。

凡有心者全有煩惱、業、苦三道性相,而它們當下就是三軌性相。所以《維摩詰所說經》的意思是,煩惱同類正是如來種。

若說如是力、如是作,就是菩提心發起,真性等三法開始萌動。如是因是觀照萌動;如是緣是資成萌動;如是果由觀照萌動而成習因,感得般若習果圓滿;如是報由資成萌動而成緣因,感得解脫報果圓滿。果與報圓滿,法身也隨之圓滿;三德究竟圓滿,就名祕密藏。

如是本末究竟等,表示性德三軌幽隱潛伏時不縱不橫,修德三軌彰明顯現時也不縱不橫。幽隱時,如等、數等、妙等;彰顯時,也如等、數等、妙等,所以稱等。也可說空等、假等、中等。

第六門:類通十種三法

前面從三軌的開始說到終極,是由下至上豎向貫通,處處無礙。現在又要橫向貫通諸法,使各處同樣無礙,所以把種種三法與三軌類比相通。它們只是因應不同緣機而名稱各異,得其意義便知道所指相同。這裏約舉十條,其餘可由此領會:三道、三識、三佛性、三般若、三菩提、三大乘、三身、三涅槃、一體三寶、三德。

三法本有無量,這裏只取十種,是舉出大要來說明開始與終極。三道輪迴是生死的根本法,所以列在最初。若要逆轉生死流,就須了解三識、知道三佛性、生起三智慧、發三菩提心、行三大乘、證三身、成三涅槃;成為三寶,利益一切眾生;化緣窮盡,便入三德,安住祕密藏。

一、類通三道

真性軌就是苦道,觀照軌就是煩惱道,資成軌就是業道。

苦道就是真性軌,因為後文說『世間相常住』;這豈不是就在生死中顯示法身?煩惱就是觀照軌,因為觀照本來是照見迷惑;沒有迷惑,也就沒有照見可說,這就是一切法空。經文說『諸法從本來,常自寂滅相』,正顯示煩惱就是觀照。觀照又像由柴生出的火。經文又說:在過去諸佛之處,只要曾聽聞一句,眾生就都已成佛道;又說深深通達罪福之相,遍照十方。這正是聽聞那一句能從根本通達煩惱的妙句。

資成軌就是業道,因為惡能成為善的助緣;若沒有惡,也無從顯出善。經文說,惡鬼進入那些人的心,使他們辱罵毀辱我;我們因為念佛,所以都應忍受這件事。惡若不來相加,便無處運用念佛;念佛正由惡來相加而起。

又在威音王佛時,執著既有法的人聽見常不輕菩薩所說,便辱罵、毀詈、打擲他;也正因這惡業,他們後來又遇見常不輕,受祂教化,全都得到不退轉。提婆達多又被說為善知識,這豈不是惡當下成為資助?

所以三軌就是三道,在理性位,是行於非道而通達佛道;五品位,是以觀行行於非道而通達佛道;六根清淨位,是以相似行於非道而通達佛道;十住以後,是以分真行於非道而通達佛道;妙覺位,則究竟行於非道而通達佛道。

二、類通三識

菴摩羅識就是真性軌,阿黎耶識就是觀照軌,阿陀那識就是資成軌。

地論師說,阿黎耶識攝在真常清淨識中;另有大乘師說,阿黎耶是無記、無明隨眠之識,又名無沒識,到第九識才名淨識,兩方彼此爭論。現在可以從近處的情形類推遠處:同一個人的心,哪裏有固定不變的性質?他作善時便是善識,作惡時便是惡識,不作善惡時便是無記識。這三種識怎會頓時像水火一樣互不相容?其實只是背離善便作惡,背離惡便作善,背離善惡便成無記;只是一個人所起的三種心。三識也應如此理解。

若阿黎耶識中有生死種子,經熏習而增長,就成分別識;若其中有智慧種子,經聞法熏習而增長,便轉依成為得道以後的真如,名為淨識;若不同於這兩種情形,便只是阿黎耶識。這也是在一法中說三,又在三者中說一。

《攝大乘論》用金、土、染、淨為譬喻:染譬喻六識,金譬喻淨識,土譬喻阿黎耶識。明白文字就在這裏,何必辛苦爭論?

經文又譬喻有人來到至親好友家中,醉酒而臥,這豈不是阿黎耶識?他在世間狂亂迷惑,分別識生起以後四處遊行,尋求衣食,這豈不是阿陀那識?聞法熏成的種子漸漸生起增長,又遇見親友指示衣中寶珠,這豈不是菴摩羅識?菴摩羅識名為無分別智光。

若阿黎耶識中有這智慧種子,在理性位便是無分別智光;五品位,是觀行無分別智光;六根清淨位,是相似無分別智光;初住以後,是分真無分別智光;妙覺位,是究竟無分別智光。粗與妙也可依此分判。

三、類通三佛性

真性軌就是正因佛性,觀照軌就是了因佛性,資成軌就是緣因佛性。

所以後文說,你確實是我的兒子,我確實是你的父親,這是正因佛性。又說,我往昔教導你們無上道,所以求一切智的誓願仍在而不曾失去;其中智慧是了因佛性,誓願是緣因佛性。又說,我不敢輕視你們,你們都應當作佛,這是正因佛性;當時四眾讀誦眾經,是了因佛性;修習種種功德,是緣因佛性。

又說,長者的兒子或有十人、二十人,乃至三十人,這就是三種佛性。又說種種性相的意義,我都已經知道、看見;既說種種性,便包括三種佛性。

若知道三軌就是三佛性,便名理佛性;五品位,是以觀行見佛性;六根清淨位,是相似見佛性;十住到等覺,是分真見佛性;妙覺位,是究竟見佛性,因此稱妙。

四、類通三般若

真性軌是實相般若,觀照軌是觀照般若,資成軌是文字般若。它們的相貌,已如前面解釋境妙、智妙、行妙時所說。

所以後文說,停止,停止,不必再說,我的法微妙難以思議;又說,這法不可顯示,言語辭說的相本自寂滅。這是實相般若。又說,只有我與十方諸佛才能知道這個相;又說,只有佛與佛才能究竟窮盡;又說,我所得的智慧微妙而最為第一。這些是觀照般若。

又說,我常知道眾生行道或不行道,隨其所應得度而為他說種種法。種種言辭隨宜方便,便是文字般若。又說,如來知見廣大深遠:廣大深遠是實相般若;如來的知見能契合這廣大深遠,是觀照般若;若說方便與知見全都具足,則是文字般若。

由此可知,三軌只是三般若的不同名稱。若三種智慧分在三心、屬於三人,就是粗;三種智慧在一心中不縱不橫,就是理妙。五品位,是觀行三般若;六根清淨位,是相似三般若;四十心,是分真三般若;妙覺位,是究竟三般若。

五、類通三菩提

真性軌就是實相菩提,觀照軌就是實智菩提,資成軌就是方便菩提。

所以後文說,我先前豈不是說過你們全都會得到阿耨多羅三藐三菩提;又說,非實、非虛、非如、非異,不像三界眾生那樣看見三界。這是實相菩提。又說,我成道以來,時間非常久遠,這是實智菩提。又說,我說自己年少出家,在伽耶城附近得到三菩提,這是方便菩提。

若從弟子來說三菩提,經文說,我若遇見眾生,全都教他們佛道,這是實相菩提;又說,安住實智之中,我必定會作佛;又說,佛子行道完畢,來世得以作佛;又說,乘這寶乘直至道場。這些都是修成實智菩提。為弟子授予八相成道的記別,便是方便菩提。

不可以說它們是一,也不可以說它們有異,這稱為如。不能決了便名粗,能夠決了便名妙。一切眾生是理性菩提;五品位,是名字菩提;六根清淨位,是相似菩提;四十一位,是分真菩提;妙覺位,是究竟菩提。

六、類通三大乘

真性軌就是理乘,觀照軌就是隨乘,資成軌就是得乘。

所以後文說,佛自己安住大乘,依祂所得之法,以定慧力莊嚴。安住大乘是理乘,定慧莊嚴是隨乘,所得之法是得乘。又可說,佛自己安住大乘是理乘;在道場已經了知是隨乘;導師方便宣說是得乘。

又對舍利弗說,因本願的緣故而說三乘法,這是得乘與隨乘;又說這一乘微妙、清淨、第一,這是理乘;又說在一佛乘中分別說三,『一佛乘』是理乘,『分別說三』是得乘與隨乘。

三乘不縱不橫,所以是妙;怎樣開粗成妙,也可依前意領會;各位次也能依此說明。五品位,是名字乘;六根清淨位,是相似乘;四十一位,是分真乘;妙覺位,是究竟乘。

七、類通三身

真性軌就是法身,觀照軌就是報身,資成軌就是應身。

《新金光明》說,依於法身,才有報身;依於報身,才有應身。這正如前面所說:依境妙才有智妙,依智妙才有行妙。另一部經文說,佛的真法身猶如虛空,順應萬物而顯現形相,如同水中之月;報身便如天上的月。

本論所引經文說,佛自己安住大乘,便是猶如虛空的實相身;又說以定慧力莊嚴,其中慧如天月,定如水月。又說,只有佛與佛才能究竟窮盡諸法實相,這是法身;我所得的智慧微妙而最為第一,是報身;名稱普遍被聽聞,是應身。

非生而示現出生等,是應身。或示現自己的身,就是法身與報身;或示現他身,就是報身與應身。又說,我以相好莊嚴身體,光明照耀十方,為眾生宣說實相印;實相印是法身,照耀十方是應身,相好莊嚴之身是報身。又說,深深通達罪福之相,遍照十方,這是報身;微妙清淨法身,是法身;具足三十二相,是應身。

所以三軌只是名稱不同,意義就是三身。《普賢觀》說,佛的三種身從方等出生。《法界性論》又以水銀和合真金、可以塗飾種種色像作譬喻:功德和合法身,也能處處應物顯現而往。

若這三身不縱不橫,就是妙;若能決了三身都歸入法身,也是妙。各位次的妙也可依此說明。

八、類通三涅槃

地論師說,只有性淨涅槃與方便淨涅槃兩種:實相名性淨涅槃,修因所成名方便淨涅槃。

現在則以本具之理為性淨涅槃,以修因所成為圓淨涅槃,這在意義上較為妥帖;又以柴薪燒盡、火焰熄滅為方便淨涅槃,這與經文較為相合。若把修因所成叫作方便淨涅槃,那麼柴盡火滅又是哪一種涅槃?因此可知應有三種涅槃,而三涅槃就是三軌。

經文說,這法不可顯示,言語辭說的相本自寂滅;又說,諸法從本以來,常自寂滅。這是性淨涅槃。又說,全都以如來的滅度使他們滅度,這是圓淨涅槃。又說,我成佛以來,時間非常久遠;這是久修業行所得,智慧光明照耀無量,也屬圓淨涅槃。

一再宣說出生,又處處示現入滅,乃至在這一夜滅度,如柴薪燒盡、火焰熄滅,豈不是方便淨涅槃?

《大般涅槃經》的題名叫大般涅槃,譯為大滅度。『大』是其體性廣博,依性淨而說;『度』是到達彼岸、智慧圓滿,依圓淨而說;『滅』是煩惱永盡、斷德成就,依方便淨而說。這三涅槃就是三軌。

九、類通一體三寶

真性軌就是法寶,觀照軌就是佛寶,資成軌就是僧寶。

法性不動,本身並不叫覺;佛智契合真理,所以佛名為覺;事相和合、真理和合,所以僧名和合。《思益》說,知覺名為佛,知離名為法,知無名為僧。這就是一體三寶。

所以後文說,佛自己安住大乘:佛是佛寶,大乘是法寶;又說,如祂所得之法,以此度化眾生,便是上與真理和合,又與眾生和合,也就是僧寶。『世間相常住』名法寶;『在道場已經了知』名佛寶;『導師方便宣說』上與真理和合、下與眾生和合,名僧寶。

一體三寶是一體而不抹去三者,是三者而不彼此分離;這三與一不縱不橫,所以稱妙。各位次也可依此說明。

十、類通三德

《大般涅槃經》以三德共同成就大涅槃,本經以三軌共同成就大乘。前者說法身德,本經說實相;前者說佛性也是一,因為一切眾生全都有一乘,也就是指實相為一乘。

前者說般若德,本經則說佛的智慧門難解難入,又說我所得的智慧微妙而最為第一,直到決了聲聞之法、是諸經之王,這些全是般若。

前者說解脫德,本經則說佛屢次示現,示現出生、示現入滅,隨眾生應受調伏之處而出現;佛自己既無繫累,又使他人解脫,乃至收取一切善事中的功德,使眾生全都證得果位。這豈不是解脫?

兩部經的意義相合,庸碌不察的人卻只隨名稱差異而作不同理解,正如聽見天帝之名,便不認得那就是憍尸迦。他們只知道《大般涅槃經》談佛性的文字,卻看不見雙樹之下也有一乘的宗旨。那部經親自說佛性也是一,一就是一乘;有人卻說,那只是《大般涅槃經》的一乘是佛性,《法華經》的一乘不是佛性。

若說《法華經》不曾顯明佛性,那麼《大般涅槃經》就不應遠指:八千聲聞在《法華經》中得到授記,如同秋收冬藏,見到如來性,從此再無所作。有人又說,《大般涅槃經》雖有遠指的文字,本經卻沒有佛性這個語詞。

現在依本經的文字,佛說種種性相的意義,我全都已經看見。既然說『種種』,為何偏偏排除佛性?經文又說,世間相常住,在道場已經了知,導師方便宣說,這豈不是佛性的文字?論中又說『佛性水常不輕』,表明常不輕知道眾生具有佛性。

《大般涅槃經》又以三德為祕密藏,說把諸子安置在祕密藏中,自己也不久將進入其中;這就是自己與他人都進入祕密。本經則說,佛自己安住大乘,以此度化眾生,終究不用小乘濟度眾生,而全都用如來滅度使他們滅度;這同樣是自己與他人都進入如來滅度。滅度就是涅槃,涅槃就是祕密藏。《釋論》說《法華經》是祕密藏;兩部經的文字與意義,明明始終相同。

人們為何一定要勉強使兩者相違?若文字與義理確實彼此乖隔,把它們理解為相同也沒有罪過;如今文字與義理本來相合,硬要使它們分離又有甚麼利益?只是《大般涅槃經》以佛性為宗,卻不是不說一乘的意義;本經以一乘為宗,也不是不說佛性的意義。因應根機而作不同宣說,所通達的意義始終相通。

若把三德理解為前後縱列或左右橫隔,就是粗;若三德不縱不橫,就是妙。各位次也可依此說明。

第七門:以四悉檀分別抉擇

有人問:十種三法以及其他一切三法,若全都是三軌,就只應當說三軌,為何還要安立種種不同名稱?

回答:眾生的根機與所宜各不相同,應當隨機施設,使教法正好投合;這些只是用四悉檀作方便,接引眾生。隨順世俗,所以說法有異;稱合各自所宜,所以說法有異;針對各自所須對治,所以說法有異;為使眾生進入佛道,所以說法有異。

朝三暮四,是安撫群猴而使牠們都歡喜;母親在乳房塗苦物,藥消後以水洗乳,再喚嬰兒飲乳,是養育嬰兒而順合時宜。善巧能夠赴應根機,所以或方或圓,全任所接之物;就像千輛車行在同一車轍,怎能死守一個名稱而懷疑其他名稱?

現在通用四悉檀,遍歷十種三法,判別妙與不妙。完整說三軌共同成就大乘;在大乘之中,三法及一切法全都具備而不相混亂,這是世界悉檀。資成軌資助智慧發起,能令善法生起,是為人悉檀。觀照軌破除迷惑,使各種惡滅除,是對治悉檀。真性軌是真實之理,是第一義悉檀。有一類眾生適宜聽聞大乘這個名稱,便由此得到四種利益。

完整說三德共同成就大涅槃。三點雖可畫成上下,卻沒有前後縱列;也可說成表裏,卻沒有左右橫隔。一不混淆三者,三又不離一體,這是世界悉檀。善的利益生起,禍患罪累不能侵害,因而超然出離繫累,所以解脫是為人悉檀。般若如金剛,凡所觸及都能擊碎,這是對治悉檀。法身就是第一義悉檀。有一類眾生聽見三德這個名稱,便得到四種利益。這裏舉最初的三軌與最後的三德,中間八種三法也可照此類推。

其次分別妙與不妙。《大智度論》說,前三悉檀是世諦,是心念可以運行之處,可以破壞;第一義悉檀是心念不能運行之處,是諸佛聖人心得之法,不可破壞,就是真諦。

若是如此,四悉檀便由真、俗二諦所攝;然而另有中道,又應攝在哪裏?若不攝中道,只是三藏教、通教的意思,這樣的悉檀就是粗。

現在說俗諦是有、真諦是無;有無彼此隔別,正是前三悉檀中心念可以運行、可以破壞之處。中道第一義既不是有,也不是無;有與無不二,便沒有隔別;沒有差異,才是真諦。前三悉檀所能通達的地方只到化城;化城不是真實,所以可以破壞,可以破壞便是粗。如今中道沒有差異,又能一直通到寶所,沒有甚麼能超越,也沒有甚麼能使它滅除,所以不可破壞,稱為妙。

若其他經典也說中道第一義悉檀,與本經並沒有不同;只是其他經典兼帶阿羅漢所得作為第一義悉檀,所以不稱為妙。本經正直捨去方便,只有圓滿真實的四悉檀,因此是妙。

若不能決了前三悉檀全都歸入第一義悉檀,仍然是粗;若能決了一一悉檀各自都具有第一義,就是妙。

五品弟子所有的是假名四悉檀;六根清淨位所有的是相似四悉檀;初住到等覺所有的是分真四悉檀;妙覺所有的是究竟四悉檀,因此稱妙。

以上五番,從因直到果,辨明十妙中自行的一半;到這裏,半如意珠的全書結構已經完成。

The Purpose of the Subtlety of the Three Dharmas and Its Seven Gates

Fifth is the subtlety of the three dharmas. These three dharmas are what people at the wondrous stages abide in after realizing the fruit described above.

The so-called three dharmas are the three tracks. “Track” means a rule or standard. Because the three dharmas can serve as the normative tracks followed by practitioners, they are called the three tracks. This major section has seven gates: first, explaining the three tracks in general; second, explaining each of the three tracks separately; third, judging coarse and wondrous; fourth, opening and revealing that coarse dharmas are originally wondrous; fifth, explaining the beginning and ultimate end of the three dharmas; sixth, using the three tracks to integrate the various sets of three dharmas; and seventh, resolving questions through the four siddhāntas.

First Gate: Explaining the Three Tracks in General

The three tracks are, first, the track of true nature; second, the track of contemplative illumination; and third, the track of supporting accomplishment. Although there are three names, in reality there is only one Great Vehicle Dharma.

The meaning of the scripture is this: search carefully throughout the ten directions and there is no other vehicle, only the One Buddha-Vehicle. This One Buddha-Vehicle itself fully possesses the three dharmas and is also called ultimate truth, the emptiness of ultimate meaning, and the tathāgata-garbha. These three dharmas cannot be fixed as three separate Dharmas. Precisely because they cannot be fixed as three, one can discuss one through the three. This one Dharma also cannot be fixed as a solitary Dharma. Precisely because it cannot be fixed as one, one can discuss three through the one. Their relation is inconceivable: the three are neither aligned side by side nor separated from one another. They are like the three dots of the siddham letter i, or like three eyes on a single face.

The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra therefore says that buddha-nature is also one, is not one, and is neither one nor not-one. “It is also one” because all sentient beings alike possess the One Vehicle; this statement refers to ultimate truth. “It is not one” because it can be described as enumerated dharmas such as these; this statement refers to the tathāgata-garbha. “It is neither one nor not-one” because enumerated and non-enumerated dharmas cannot be fixed; this statement refers to the emptiness of ultimate meaning. Each of the three statements includes “also” as an emphatic, repeated clarification. In reality there is only one Dharma, which can also bear three names. One therefore cannot take only one aspect, nor can several aspects be overlaid into a composite thing. They are neither vertically ordered before and after nor horizontally arranged left and right, but always three as one and one as three.

The various truths explained earlier—whether opened or combined, judged coarse or judged wondrous—have already disclosed the characteristics of the track of true nature. The various kinds of wisdom explained earlier—whether opened or combined, coarse or wondrous—have already disclosed the characteristics of the track of contemplative illumination. The various practices explained earlier—whether opened or combined, coarse or wondrous—have already disclosed the characteristics of the track of supporting accomplishment. The various stages explained earlier are simply the fruit realized by cultivating these three dharmas.

Since the preceding four subtleties have already explained them, why must the three dharmas be stated again? There are three reasons.

First, the preceding subtleties of objects, wisdom, and practice are the three tracks ridden by practitioners at the causal stages. The Great Vehicle discussed now has already reached the place of awakening and consists of the three tracks abided in after realization of the fruit.

Second, the preceding sections used the distinct names objects, wisdom, and practice and explained them separately. Here they are all called dharmas and explained together.

Third, the preceding sections explained their separate characteristics directly without tracing beginning and end. Traced to the most remote beginning, they are the three tracks of nature-virtue, also called the Tathāgata’s treasury. Traced to the ultimate end, they are the three tracks of cultivated virtue, also called the secret treasury. Between beginning and end they contain all Dharmas. From the three dharmas of nature-virtue arise the three dharmas of designation. On the basis of the three dharmas of designation, one cultivates the three dharmas of contemplative practice. From the three dharmas of contemplative practice arise the three dharmas of resemblance; these proceed through the three dharmas of partial realization and finally reach the three dharmas of the ultimate. One can both accomplish the three dharmas oneself and use them to transform others. For these three reasons, they should be explained again.

Zhang’an’s Appended Explanation

The recorder Zhang’an adds here: one statement is immediately three statements, and three statements are immediately one. This is called the Perfect Buddha-Vehicle. The master’s explanation recorded above opens various skillful means from the single statement on the tathāgata-garbha. Since that is only a specific judgment, by analogy all three statements should be opened generally.

“It is not one, because it consists of enumerated dharmas” indicates the tathāgata-garbha, from which open the phenomenal skillful means of the three vehicles in the Tripiṭaka Teaching. “It is neither one nor not-one, because enumerated and non-enumerated dharmas cannot be fixed” indicates the emptiness of ultimate meaning, from which open the paths of the three types of practitioners in the Shared Teaching who realize the true directly within phenomena. “It is also one, because all sentient beings alike possess the One Vehicle” indicates ultimate truth, from which opens the Distinct Teaching’s vehicle solely for bodhisattvas. All these skillful means open from the Perfect Buddha-Vehicle. The scripture therefore says that three vehicles are distinguished within the One Buddha-Vehicle. This is its meaning.

Second Gate: Explaining the Three Dharmas Separately

Before explaining them one by one, one must first know how the Tathāgata opens skillful means and then combines them back into the One Vehicle. Only after understanding this opening and combining can one understand how the three dharmas are comprehensively gathered to form one Great Vehicle.

From what Dharma does the Buddha open the various provisional vehicles? The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra says that buddha-nature is not one because three vehicles can be taught. One should therefore know that all vehicles distinguished by number are encompassed by the tathāgata-garbha. From this treasury the Buddha opens the vehicles of śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas, as well as the Shared and Distinct vehicles of bodhisattvas.

Why is this said? Since the various vehicles are skillful means, while the tathāgata-garbha in this correspondence belongs to phenomena, skillful means open from phenomena. The various provisional vehicles are therefore said to be encompassed by the tathāgata-garbha.

Scripture provides a threefold basis. The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra says that the śrāvaka Saṅgha is called a conditioned Saṅgha. It also says that the six pāramitās are the adornment of merit, and that śrāvakas, because their power of concentration is great, do not see buddha-nature. From this one knows that the power of concentration belongs to merit and merit is conditioned. Within the three realms, for example, the delusions of views and thought have not yet been broken, so activity still occurs and is called conditioned. The principle attained does not accord and is therefore called contaminated. Because it is not the Dharma of Middle-Way wisdom, it is called merit. Looking from a lower stage toward a higher one should now be understood in the same way: those of the Two Vehicles have not yet broken through transformational birth-and-death and therefore remain conditioned; they have not yet escaped ignorance and are therefore called contaminated; what they have attained is not Middle-Way wisdom and is therefore called merit.

It follows that the various skillful vehicles are all encompassed by the track of supporting accomplishment. Each opens partially from the single statement of the Great Vehicle and is not ultimate Dharma. The scripture’s statement that three are distinguished within the One Buddha-Vehicle has precisely this meaning. One can likewise say that five, seven, or nine are distinguished within the One Buddha-Vehicle. Under this explanation, the single statement on the tathāgata-garbha opens the various skillful means and all Dharmas of the provisional vehicles.

The Three Dharmas of the Tripiṭaka Teaching

The three dharmas are next explained according to each of the Four Teachings.

In the Tripiṭaka Teaching, unconditioned wisdom is called the track of contemplative illumination and serves directly as the substance of the vehicle. Dharmas that assist the path become the vehicle’s equipment and are called the track of supporting accomplishment. The primary and auxiliary aspects of the vehicle sever delusion and enter the true; the truth entered is the track of true nature. Because the teaching comes to express these three, verbal teaching itself is called a vehicle.

The same applies to pratyekabuddhas. Bodhisattvas take contemplation of impermanence as the track of contemplative illumination, the enrichment of merit as the track of supporting accomplishment, and sitting at the place of awakening, severing the bonds, and seeing the true as the track of true nature. This teaching comes to express the true and is therefore the teaching-vehicle. Practitioners emerge from the three realms and abide in sarvajñā. At that point the work of verbal teaching is exhausted, so no teaching-vehicle remains. The truth realized cannot itself continue to transport, so realization is no longer a vehicle. Hence there is the wish to seek the great cart from the Buddha.

The Three Dharmas of the Shared Teaching

The Shared Teaching takes the track of true nature as the substance of the vehicle. Why? Form itself is emptiness; principle is originally present within phenomena, and this principle is true, so it serves as the vehicle’s substance. Wisdom that sees immediate emptiness is the track of contemplative illumination, and the various practices are the track of supporting accomplishment.

This teaching expresses the true and is therefore the teaching-vehicle. Practitioners leave the three realms and abide in sarvajñā. After emerging from the three realms, bodhisattvas continue to use practice as a vehicle, purify buddha-lands, and transform sentient beings; only when they reach the place of awakening can they be said to abide. This can also be described as teaching without a fixed person who abides in what is attained. When verbal teaching withdraws and realization returns to quiescence, the meaning of transport no longer remains. Thus there is likewise the wish to seek the great cart.

The Three Dharmas of the Distinct Teaching

The Distinct Teaching takes contemplative illumination cultivated through conditions as the substance of the vehicle, while the various practices are supporting accomplishment. These two Dharmas together form wisdom cultivated through conditions. Wisdom can break delusion and reveal principle, while principle itself cannot break delusion. If principle itself could break delusion, then since all sentient beings fully possess principle-nature, why would their delusions not be broken naturally? Only after practitioners obtain this wisdom can they break delusion; wisdom is therefore used as the vehicle’s substance.

The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra accordingly teaches that what is unconditioned and uncontaminated is called the bodhisattva Saṅgha, and that the wisdom of the first ground, second ground, through the tenth ground is called the adornment of wisdom. Because this wisdom transports practitioners through the ten grounds, it is the vehicle’s substance.

The Mahāyānasaṃgraha, however, is said to teach three vehicles: the vehicle of principle, the accompanying vehicle, and the attained vehicle. The vehicle of principle is suchness before cultivation of the path. The accompanying vehicle is the wisdom that contemplates suchness and accords with its object. The attained vehicle is the perfuming of nondiscriminating wisdom by all practices and vows, through which that wisdom accords with the nondiscriminating object and corresponds with suchness. At first glance these three levels resemble the three tracks, but their before and after have not yet been perfectly integrated.

Where does the problem lie? The ninth consciousness is described as suchness after cultivation of the path. Suchness itself does not engage phenomena, while the basic seeds of wisdom and practice are all perfumed and brought to fulfillment within ālaya-consciousness, after which the light of nondiscriminating wisdom is attained and true nature accomplished. The vehicle of principle is therefore originally present, while the accompanying and attained vehicles exist only now; only suchness after the path can finally transform sentient beings. Is this not a vertical sequence? If the three vehicles are also all encompassed by ālaya-consciousness, they become a horizontal arrangement and can easily be confused with primordial darkness giving birth to awareness. Vertical and horizontal at once, they conflict with the relation of the true siddham letter i.

When the Tathāgata first appeared in the world, he wished to teach the real directly. Because sentient beings could not bear it, he first used impermanence to dispel inversion, next used emptiness and purity to wash away attachments, then used sequentially differentiated Dharma gates to arouse their minds step by step, and only afterward revealed permanence, bliss, self, and purity. Nāgārjuna composed a treatise to clarify this intent of the Buddha. He first used the emptiness in which nothing can be obtained to wash away fixed attachments. When practitioners become accustomed to corresponding with the emptiness of all Dharmas, this is called corresponding with prajñā. Does this emptiness not empty ignorance? If ignorance is empty, where can its seeds be placed? Once all Dharmas have been purified, Dharmas are taught on the basis of emptiness and formed into four alternatives, but what is said remains profound and does not abide in attachment. It is like eating only after an illness has been cured, while the food eaten must still be digested.

How could one begin by insisting that all Dharmas arise from ālaya-consciousness? When the original views and conceit have not been subdued at all, rigidly grasping newly learned words only adds water to long-standing ice and thickens attachment. Thus the teaching of this treatise was not given specifically for heavily attached sentient beings of the latter age; it is only one Dharma gate beyond the realms.

One may ask further: if ālaya-consciousness fully possesses all Dharmas, how could it fail to possess suchness after cultivation of the path? If it possesses suchness, how can suchness be said not to be the eighth consciousness? This is perhaps still a skillful means opened from the tathāgata-garbha. If a skillful means is grasped as ultimate, it gravely obstructs the real. Even when its basis is real, attachment to it becomes a view made of words. This is like feeding an infant too much ghee and endangering the infant’s life. If one can understand well the intent of refutation and establishment, one can meet the various scriptures and treatises with purity and without obstruction.

The Three Dharmas of the Perfect Teaching

The Perfect Teaching takes the track of true nature as the substance of the vehicle. It is not false and is therefore called true; it does not change and is therefore called nature. It is the permanently abiding direct cause, the Dharma honored as teacher by all buddhas. All sentient beings alike possess the One Vehicle. Sentient beings are immediately the mark of nirvāṇa and cannot be extinguished again; nirvāṇa is immediately birth-and-death, without establishing an extinction apart from birth-and-death or a birth apart from nirvāṇa. The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra is therefore cited as saying that this vehicle does not move and does not emerge. This is precisely the vehicle of the Perfect Teaching.

The track of contemplative illumination simply points out within true nature itself the aspect that is quiescent yet constantly illuminating; this is the emptiness of ultimate meaning. The track of supporting accomplishment simply points out within the Dharma realm of true nature the aspect that contains all practices and fully possesses immeasurable supporting conditions; this is the tathāgata-garbha.

The three dharmas are neither wholly identical nor different from one another. They are like separately speaking of a wish-fulfilling jewel’s radiance and treasure. Radiance and treasure do not bear the same name as the jewel, yet neither exists apart from it. The three dharmas are the same: they are also one, are not one, and are neither one nor not-one. They are the inconceivable three dharmas.

If one is deluded about these three dharmas, they become the three obstructions. First, dust-and-sand delusions within and beyond the realms obstruct the tathāgata-garbha. Second, the delusions of views and thought treated in the Shared and Distinct Teachings obstruct the emptiness of ultimate meaning. Third, fundamental ignorance obstructs the principle of ultimate meaning.

If one penetrates immeasurable Dharma gates right within dust-and-sand delusions, the track of supporting accomplishment is revealed. If one penetrates the emptiness of ultimate meaning right within the delusions of views and thought, the track of contemplative illumination is revealed. If one penetrates ultimate truth right within ignorance, the track of true nature is revealed. The revelation of the track of true nature is called Dharma-body; the revelation of contemplative illumination is called prajñā; the revelation of supporting accomplishment is called liberation. Contemplative illumination and supporting accomplishment are the adornment of concentration and wisdom that adorns the Dharma-body. The Dharma-body is the substance of the vehicle, while concentration and wisdom are its various pieces of equipment.

The scripture’s description of the cart as high and broad and adorned with many jewels has precisely this meaning. Practitioners of the Perfect Teaching ride this vehicle to sarvajñā. Once they pass beyond the graph (“tea”), no further graph can be spoken. Since no graph can be spoken, it would seem that no vehicle should remain to transport. In one’s own practice, when transport is complete, the function of the vehicle temporarily ceases. If the work of transforming others is not yet complete, transport of others does not cease. The scripture therefore means that the Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and, according to the Dharma he has attained, adorns it with the powers of concentration and wisdom and uses it to liberate sentient beings.

When a driver has brought a cart to its destination, the implement is still called a cart. The vehicle at the fruit-stage is likewise still called transport.

Moreover, why must a vehicle be explained only through “transport”? In terms of true nature, it neither moves nor emerges and cannot be called only transport or only nontransport. In terms of contemplative illumination and supporting accomplishment, they can move and emerge and are therefore called transport. Yet moving and emerging are immediately not moving and not emerging; not moving and not emerging are immediately moving and emerging. Speaking from function to substance, moving and emerging are not moving and not emerging. Speaking from substance to function, not moving and not emerging are moving and emerging. Substance and function are originally nondual, yet may be spoken of as two aspects.

For example, turning and not turning can both be called avaivartika, nonretrogression; moving and not moving can both be called vinaya, discipline. According to this principle, setting forth and not setting forth can both be called a vehicle.

Third Gate: Judging Coarse and Wondrous

First consider the Tripiṭaka Teaching. It discusses the three dharmas as a vehicle within conditioned merit. The four establishments of mindfulness are wisdom from hearing, which rides the teaching-vehicle to the four wholesome roots. The four wholesome roots ride the practice-vehicle to seeing the truths. Seeing the truths then rides the realization-vehicle to the stage beyond learning. This is a provisional skillful Dharma. After leaving the three realms, practitioners take the true as realization, but after realization there is no further transport and the real Great Vehicle has not been seen. They therefore lament and blame themselves, wishing to ask the World-Honored One whether they have lost or not lost it. The half-word teaching is only gradual guidance, not ultimate meaning, so all three dharmas within it are coarse.

The Shared Teaching uses the wisdom of immediate emptiness as the vehicle of the three dharmas. Its method is more skillful, while the remaining meaning is largely the same. The ground of dry wisdom rides the teaching-vehicle to the ground of nature. The ground of nature rides the practice-vehicle to the ground of eight persons and the ground of seeing. Those grounds ride the realization-vehicle into realization. This is still a partial teaching and is therefore coarse.

The Distinct Teaching uses supporting accomplishment to assist contemplative illumination and contemplative illumination to open and reveal true nature; the three dharmas together form the vehicle. The ten faiths ride the teaching, the ten abodes ride the practice, and the ten grounds ride realization until abiding in sarvajñā at wondrous awakening. Once cultivation through conditions is accomplished, it withdraws and only true cultivation remains. On this account, supporting accomplishment comes first, contemplative illumination comes in the middle, and true nature comes last. The three are vertically separated before and after and cannot form the Great Vehicle. They are also separately juxtaposed and horizontally divided, and likewise cannot form the Great Vehicle. This remains a skillful Dharma and is therefore coarse.

The Perfect Teaching points directly to the true mark as the emptiness of ultimate meaning. If one looks only at the word “emptiness,” it seems to fall into a vertical sequence. Yet the emptiness of ultimate meaning is immediately the true mark. Since the true mark is not vertical, how could this emptiness be vertical? It also points directly to the true mark as the tathāgata-garbha. If one looks only at the word “treasury,” it seems to fall into horizontal arrangement. Yet the tathāgata-garbha is immediately the true mark. Since the true mark is not horizontal, how could this treasury be horizontal? It cannot be conceived vertically or horizontally and is therefore called the inconceivable Dharma, which is wondrous.

Someone may object: if emptiness and the treasury are pointed out as the true mark, while emptiness seems vertical and the treasury horizontal, how can the true mark be neither vertical nor horizontal? The answer must be seen in their immediate identity. When emptiness is pointed out as the tathāgata-garbha, since emptiness is not horizontal, how could the treasury be horizontal? When the tathāgata-garbha is pointed out as emptiness, since the treasury is not vertical, how could emptiness be vertical? When the true mark is pointed out as emptiness and the treasury, since the true mark is neither vertical nor horizontal, emptiness and the treasury are likewise neither vertical nor horizontal. The three turn and are immediately identical with one another. They are inconceivable and therefore called wondrous.

Breadth is pointed out in terms of the tathāgata-garbha, so the great cart is said to be high and broad. Height is pointed out in terms of the emptiness of ultimate meaning, so the cart is said to be high and broad. Because the tathāgata-garbha is the true mark, the cart cannot be fixed as broad. Because the emptiness of ultimate meaning is the true mark, the cart cannot be fixed as high. Yet the true mark is immediately emptiness—how could it not be high? The true mark is immediately the tathāgata-garbha—how could it not be broad?

The true mark is further pointed out as the tathāgata-garbha, so the cart is said to be adorned with many jewels and attended by many servants. The true mark is pointed out as the emptiness of ultimate meaning, so there is said to be a great white ox, strong and powerful, walking evenly and running as swiftly as the wind. Wisdom is unstained and is therefore called white. It can break delusion and is therefore called powerful. Middle-Way wisdom is called even. Entry into effortless practice is said to be swift as the wind. The inconceivable three dharmas together form one great cart. How could there still be differences of vertical and horizontal, juxtaposition and separation?

This teaching-vehicle, neither vertical nor horizontal, is ridden by practitioners of the five grades and reaches understanding by resemblance. This practice-vehicle, neither vertical nor horizontal, is ridden by those with understanding by resemblance and reaches the ten abodes. This realization-vehicle, neither vertical nor horizontal, is ridden by those at the ten abodes and reaches abiding in sarvajñā at wondrous awakening. It is therefore called the wondrous vehicle. Scripture also calls this vehicle wondrous, pure, and foremost.

When a lecture was given at Waguan Temple, someone dreamed that listeners rode out in carts and carriages, filling the gate. When a lecture was given elsewhere, someone dreamed of people in yellow robes filling the road. Judged by these signs, wrong and right were already clear.

The various coarse and wondrous vehicles can further be judged according to the five flavors: the milk teaching has one coarse and one wondrous; the curds teaching has only one coarse; raw ghee has three coarse and one wondrous; refined ghee has two coarse and one wondrous. Other scriptures all carry vertical and horizontal skillful means while teaching the reality that is neither vertical nor horizontal, so their aspect of skillful means is called coarse. The present scripture directly casts aside skillful means and is therefore specially given the name wondrous.

Fourth Gate: Opening the Coarse to Reveal the Wondrous

Opening the coarse to reveal the wondrous is explained through the three statements on buddha-nature in the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra.

First, the scripture says that buddha-nature is also one because all sentient beings alike possess the One Vehicle. This is the One Vehicle that neither moves nor emerges. It originally fully possesses the three dharmas and is neither vertical nor horizontal. All who have mind possess this principle, yet it is like every member of a family, old and young, failing to know about the treasure in their own house; it is therefore called coarse. Now the treasury of awakening is shown to sentient beings, the weeds are cleared away, and the hidden gold is opened and revealed. All unobstructed people leave birth-and-death along one path. Search carefully throughout the ten directions: there is no other vehicle, only the One Buddha-Vehicle. It is therefore called wondrous.

Second, the scripture says that buddha-nature is neither one nor not-one because enumerated and non-enumerated dharmas cannot be fixed. If one grasps that wisdom cultivated through conditions must necessarily reveal principle, while wisdom itself is not principle, then the function of illumination remains unclear and buddha-nature is not seen; this is therefore called coarse. Now that wisdom is opened from fixed attachment into unfixed wisdom: wisdom is immediately principle, and principle immediately wisdom. One does not cling to enumerated dharmas by fixing them as three or one; nor does one cling to what is not enumerated by fixing it as neither three nor one. Only this is called unattached wondrous wisdom.

This wisdom can break every fixed and unfixed characteristic without clinging to what breaks or what is broken. It is like a wheel-turning king who both quells disorder and brings peace, like the sun that dispels darkness and nurtures living things, and like a physician who removes a film from the eye and then cares for the eyeball. This is the wondrous wisdom of the Great Vehicle that is neither vertical nor horizontal.

Third, the scripture says that buddha-nature is not one because three vehicles can be taught. This includes the three, five, seven, and other kinds of skillful vehicles. If one abides in these vehicles, what is attained is only phenomenal good and partial truth; the place entered remains near and is therefore called coarse. If the various vehicles are now decisively understood as immediately the tathāgata-garbha, while the treasury is called buddha-nature, then from the wholesome deeds of humans and gods through the Distinct Teaching’s bodhisattva vehicle, every Dharma enters the wondrous immediately without moving from its original basis.

Thus, the three statements encompass all Dharmas. No Dharma is other than buddha-nature, and every Dharma is wondrous. With no separate coarse Dharma left to stand in relation, this is absolute wondrousness.

Fifth Gate: The Beginning and Ultimate End of the Three Dharmas

The beginning of the three dharmas is not taken to be the teaching-vehicle at the five grades. Instead, the beginning of the three dharmas is one thought in the mind of an ordinary person, which fully possesses the ten Dharma realms and the ten suchnesses in each realm.

Why? The ten suchnesses are precisely the three tracks. Such-a-substance is the track of true nature. Such-a-nature, spoken in terms of the inner, is the track of contemplative illumination. Such-a-mark, spoken in terms of the outer, is merit and thus the track of supporting accomplishment. Such-a-power is the understanding-cause and belongs to contemplative illumination. Such-a-function is diligent performance of the myriad practices and belongs to supporting accomplishment. Such-a-cause is the habituation-cause and belongs to contemplative illumination. Such-a-condition is the recompense-cause and belongs to supporting accomplishment. Such-a-fruit is the habituation-fruit and belongs to contemplative illumination. Such-a-recompense is habituated recompense and belongs to supporting accomplishment. Within such-a-consummation-of-beginning-and-end, equality in emptiness belongs to contemplative illumination, equality in provisionality to supporting accomplishment, and equality in the Middle to true nature. This first discusses the three tracks solely in terms of the ten suchnesses of a single Dharma realm.

Proceeding further, a single thought of an ordinary person fully possesses the ten Dharma realms. Every realm has the nature and characteristics of affliction, the nature and characteristics of evil karma, and the nature and characteristics of the path of suffering.

When the nature and characteristics of ignorance and affliction are present, they are immediately the nature and characteristics of the wisdom of contemplative illumination. Why? Ignorance arises because illumination is misconstrued. If ignorance is understood, it is immediately illumination. The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra means that when ignorance is transformed, it becomes illumination. The Vimalakīrti Sūtra means that ignorance itself is illumination. Thus, illumination cannot be found apart from ignorance, just as ice is water and water is ice.

The ten realms fully possessed in an ordinary person’s single thought likewise all have the nature and characteristics of evil karma. The nature and characteristics of evil are immediately the nature and characteristics of good. Because there is evil, there is good to be disclosed; apart from evil there is no good that can be transformed into. Transforming the various evils is precisely the supporting accomplishment of good. Bamboo, for example, has the potential for fire. Before it becomes actual fire, it possesses the potential without burning. When conditions make fire an actual event, it can burn things. Evil immediately possesses the nature of good but has not yet become a wholesome event. When conditions make it an event, it can transform evil. Fire emerges from bamboo and turns back to burn the bamboo; good exists within evil, and when good is accomplished it turns back to break evil. Therefore, the nature and characteristics of evil are immediately the nature and characteristics of good.

An ordinary person’s single thought also possesses the nature and characteristics of the path of suffering—the consciousness, name-and-form, and so forth—of all ten realms. Deluded about this path of suffering, birth-and-death stretches vast and boundless. This is the Dharma-body misconstrued as the path of suffering; there is no separate Dharma-body apart from the path of suffering. It is like mistaking south for north, when there is no other south elsewhere. When one awakens to birth-and-death, birth-and-death is immediately the Dharma-body. Thus, the nature and characteristics of the path of suffering are the nature and characteristics of the Dharma-body.

All who have mind possess the nature and characteristics of the three paths—affliction, karma, and suffering—and these are immediately the nature and characteristics of the three tracks. The Vimalakīrti Sūtra therefore means that the class of afflictions is precisely the seed of the Tathāgata.

Such-a-power and such-a-function mean that the aspiration for bodhi arises and the three dharmas, including true nature, begin to stir. Such-a-cause is the stirring of contemplative illumination. Such-a-condition is the stirring of supporting accomplishment. Through the stirring of contemplative illumination, such-a-fruit becomes a habituation-cause and brings the habituation-fruit of prajñā to fulfillment. Through the stirring of supporting accomplishment, such-a-recompense becomes a conditioning cause and brings the recompense-fruit of liberation to fulfillment. When fruit and recompense are fulfilled, the Dharma-body is likewise fulfilled. This is the ultimate fulfillment of the three virtues and is called the secret treasury.

Such-a-consummation-of-beginning-and-end means that the three tracks of nature-virtue are concealed yet neither vertical nor horizontal, while the three tracks of cultivated virtue are manifest yet likewise neither vertical nor horizontal. Concealed, they are equal in suchness, equal in number, and equal in wondrousness. Manifest, they are also equal in suchness, equal in number, and equal in wondrousness; hence they are called equal. They can also be spoken of as equality in emptiness, equality in provisionality, and equality in the Middle.

Sixth Gate: Integrating Ten Sets of Three Dharmas

The preceding account extends from the beginning of the three tracks to their ultimate end. This is unobstructed vertical integration from lower to higher. Now the various Dharmas are also to be integrated horizontally so that they are unobstructed everywhere. The various sets of three dharmas are therefore compared and connected with the three tracks. Their names differ only in response to different causes and capacities; once the meaning is understood, one knows that their referents agree. Ten sets are presented as an outline, from which the rest can be understood: the three paths, three consciousnesses, three buddha-natures, three prajñās, three bodhis, three Great Vehicles, three bodies, three nirvāṇas, the Three Jewels in one substance, and the three virtues.

There are immeasurably many sets of three dharmas. Only ten are selected here in order to present the essentials and explain their beginning and end. The round of the three paths is the fundamental Dharma of birth-and-death and is therefore placed first. To reverse the current of birth-and-death, one must understand the three consciousnesses, know the three buddha-natures, bring forth the three wisdoms, arouse the three aspirations for bodhi, practice the three Great Vehicles, realize the three bodies, and accomplish the three nirvāṇas. One becomes the Three Jewels and benefits all sentient beings. When the conditions for transformation are exhausted, one enters the three virtues and abides in the secret treasury.

1. Integrating the Three Paths

The track of true nature is the path of suffering, the track of contemplative illumination is the path of affliction, and the track of supporting accomplishment is the path of karma.

The path of suffering is the track of true nature because a later passage says that the characteristics of the world constantly abide. Does this not disclose the Dharma-body right within birth-and-death? Affliction is the track of contemplative illumination because contemplative illumination originally illuminates delusion; without delusion, there would be no illumination to discuss. This is the emptiness of all Dharmas. The scripture says that all Dharmas from the beginning constantly bear the characteristics of quiescent extinction, which precisely discloses that affliction is contemplative illumination. Illumination is also like fire arising from fuel. The scripture further says that before the buddhas of the past, those who heard even one statement all already accomplished the Buddha-path; it also says that those who deeply penetrate the characteristics of wrongdoing and merit illuminate throughout the ten directions. This is precisely hearing the wondrous statement that penetrates affliction at its root.

The track of supporting accomplishment is the path of karma because evil can serve as a supporting condition for good; without evil there would be no way for good to become manifest. The scripture says that evil spirits enter the minds of those people and cause them to abuse and insult me; because we are mindful of the Buddha, we should all endure this. If evil did not come and press upon one, there would be no occasion to employ mindfulness of the Buddha. Mindfulness of the Buddha arises precisely because evil presses upon one.

Again, in the time of the Buddha King of Majestic Sound, people attached to existing Dharmas heard what Bodhisattva Never Disparaging said and abused, reviled, struck, and threw things at him. Precisely because of this evil karma, they later encountered Never Disparaging again, received his teaching, and all attained nonretrogression. Devadatta is likewise called a wholesome spiritual friend. Does this not show evil immediately becoming support?

Thus, the three tracks are the three paths. At the level of principle, one practices in what is not the path and penetrates the Buddha-path. At the five grades, contemplative practice proceeds in what is not the path and penetrates the Buddha-path. At purification of the six sense faculties, resemblance proceeds in what is not the path and penetrates the Buddha-path. From the ten abodes onward, partial realization proceeds in what is not the path and penetrates the Buddha-path. At wondrous awakening, one ultimately proceeds in what is not the path and penetrates the Buddha-path.

2. Integrating the Three Consciousnesses

Amala-consciousness is the track of true nature, ālaya-consciousness is the track of contemplative illumination, and ādāna-consciousness is the track of supporting accomplishment.

Masters of the Treatise on the Ten Grounds say that ālaya-consciousness is encompassed by true, permanent, pure consciousness. Other Mahāyāna masters say that ālaya is a karmically indeterminate consciousness of latent ignorance, also called the non-disappearing consciousness, while only the ninth consciousness is called pure consciousness. The two sides dispute one another. A nearby situation can now be used to infer what is remote. How could one person’s mind have a fixed, unchanging nature? When one does good, it is wholesome consciousness; when one does evil, it is unwholesome consciousness; when one does neither good nor evil, it is karmically indeterminate consciousness. How could these three consciousnesses suddenly be mutually incompatible like water and fire? In fact, turning away from good is doing evil, turning away from evil is doing good, and turning away from both good and evil is becoming indeterminate. They are simply three minds arising in one person. The three consciousnesses should be understood in the same way.

If seeds of birth-and-death in ālaya-consciousness are perfumed and grow, they become discriminating consciousness. If seeds of wisdom within it are perfumed by hearing the Dharma and grow, the basis is transformed into suchness after attainment of the path and is called pure consciousness. If it differs from both these conditions, it is simply ālaya-consciousness. This is again speaking of three within one Dharma and one within the three.

The Mahāyānasaṃgraha uses gold, earth, defilement, and purity as a simile: defilement represents the six consciousnesses, gold represents pure consciousness, and earth represents ālaya-consciousness. The explicit text stands here; why labor over dispute?

Scripture further gives the simile of someone who visits a close friend’s house and lies down drunk. Is this not ālaya-consciousness? Wandering madly and confused in the world after discriminating consciousness has arisen, seeking food and clothing—is this not ādāna-consciousness? The seeds perfumed by hearing gradually arise and grow; the person meets the close friend, who points out the jewel in the robe—is this not amala-consciousness? Amala-consciousness is called the light of nondiscriminating wisdom.

If ālaya-consciousness has this seed of wisdom, then at the level of principle it is the light of nondiscriminating wisdom. At the five grades, it is the light of nondiscriminating wisdom in contemplative practice. At purification of the six sense faculties, it is the light of nondiscriminating wisdom by resemblance. From the first abode onward, it is the light of nondiscriminating wisdom in partial realization. At wondrous awakening, it is the ultimate light of nondiscriminating wisdom. Coarse and wondrous can likewise be judged in this way.

3. Integrating the Three Buddha-Natures

The track of true nature is buddha-nature as direct cause, the track of contemplative illumination is buddha-nature as understanding-cause, and the track of supporting accomplishment is buddha-nature as conditioning cause.

A later passage therefore says: “You truly are my son; I truly am your father.” This is buddha-nature as direct cause. It also says that because I formerly taught you the unsurpassed path, the vow for all-wisdom still remains and has not been lost. Wisdom here is buddha-nature as understanding-cause, while the vow is buddha-nature as conditioning cause. It further says: “I do not dare disparage you; all of you will become buddhas.” This is buddha-nature as direct cause. At that time the fourfold assembly read and recited the various scriptures, which is buddha-nature as understanding-cause; they cultivated various merits, which is buddha-nature as conditioning cause.

The scripture further says that the elder’s sons may number ten, twenty, or even thirty. These are the three kinds of buddha-nature. It also says that the meanings of the various natures and characteristics have all been known and seen. Since it speaks of various natures, the three kinds of buddha-nature are included.

Knowing that the three tracks are the three buddha-natures is called buddha-nature at the level of principle. At the five grades, one sees buddha-nature through contemplative practice. At purification of the six sense faculties, one sees buddha-nature by resemblance. From the ten abodes through equal awakening, one sees buddha-nature through partial realization. At wondrous awakening, one ultimately sees buddha-nature. It is therefore called wondrous.

4. Integrating the Three Prajñās

The track of true nature is prajñā of the true mark, the track of contemplative illumination is prajñā of contemplative illumination, and the track of supporting accomplishment is prajñā of written words. Their characteristics are as already explained in the preceding subtleties of objects, wisdom, and practice.

A later passage therefore says, “Stop, stop, there is no need to speak; my Dharma is wondrous and difficult to conceive.” It also says, “This Dharma cannot be shown; the characteristics of words are quiescent and extinct.” This is prajñā of the true mark. It further says that only I and the buddhas of the ten directions can know this characteristic; only a buddha together with a buddha can ultimately exhaust it; and the wisdom I have attained is wondrous and foremost. These are prajñā of contemplative illumination.

It also says: I always know whether sentient beings practice the path or do not practice it, and according to how they may be liberated I teach various Dharmas for them. Various expressions offered as skillful means according to what is suitable are prajñā of written words. It further says that the Tathāgata’s knowing and seeing is vast, great, profound, and far-reaching. Vastness, greatness, profundity, and far-reachingness are prajñā of the true mark. The Tathāgata’s knowing and seeing that accords with this vastness, greatness, profundity, and far-reachingness is prajñā of contemplative illumination. When skillful means and knowing and seeing are said to be fully complete, that is prajñā of written words.

Thus, the three tracks are simply different names for the three prajñās. If the three kinds of wisdom are divided among three minds and belong to three people, they are coarse. If the three kinds of wisdom are in one mind, neither vertical nor horizontal, they are wondrous at the level of principle. At the five grades are the three prajñās of contemplative practice; at purification of the six sense faculties, the three prajñās by resemblance; at the forty minds, the three prajñās of partial realization; and at wondrous awakening, the ultimate three prajñās.

5. Integrating the Three Bodhis

The track of true nature is bodhi of the true mark, the track of contemplative illumination is bodhi of real wisdom, and the track of supporting accomplishment is bodhi of skillful means.

A later passage therefore says: Did I not previously say that all of you would attain unsurpassed complete awakening? It also says, “Neither real nor false, neither thus nor different, not seeing the three realms as [beings in] the three realms see them.” This is bodhi of the true mark. It further says that since I attained the path, an exceedingly long time has passed. This is bodhi of real wisdom. It also says that I was young when I left home, and attained bodhi near Gayā City. This is bodhi of skillful means.

When the three bodhis are explained in terms of disciples, the scripture says that whenever I encounter sentient beings, I teach them all the Buddha-path. This is bodhi of the true mark. It also says: abiding in real wisdom, I will certainly become a buddha; buddha-children who have completed the practice of the path will become buddhas in a future life; and riding this jeweled vehicle, they go directly to the place of awakening. These are all bodhi of real wisdom accomplished through cultivation. Bestowing on disciples a prediction of awakening through the eight signs is bodhi of skillful means.

They cannot be said to be one, nor can they be said to differ; this is called suchness. When they are not decisively understood, they are called coarse; when decisively understood, wondrous. All sentient beings possess bodhi at the level of principle. At the five grades is bodhi in designation; at purification of the six sense faculties, bodhi by resemblance; at the forty-one stages, bodhi through partial realization; and at wondrous awakening, ultimate bodhi.

6. Integrating the Three Great Vehicles

The track of true nature is the vehicle of principle, the track of contemplative illumination is the accompanying vehicle, and the track of supporting accomplishment is the attained vehicle.

A later passage therefore says that the Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and, according to the Dharma he has attained, adorns it with the powers of concentration and wisdom. Abiding in the Great Vehicle is the vehicle of principle, the adornment of concentration and wisdom is the accompanying vehicle, and the Dharma attained is the attained vehicle. One can also say that the Buddha himself abiding in the Great Vehicle is the vehicle of principle; knowing at the place of awakening is the accompanying vehicle; and the guide’s skillful teaching is the attained vehicle.

It further says to Śāriputra that the Dharma of three vehicles is taught because of an original vow. This is the attained and accompanying vehicles. It also says that this vehicle is wondrous, pure, and foremost. This is the vehicle of principle. When it says that three are distinguished within the One Buddha-Vehicle, “the One Buddha-Vehicle” is the vehicle of principle, while “distinguished as three” is the attained and accompanying vehicles.

The three vehicles are neither vertical nor horizontal and are therefore wondrous. How the coarse is opened into the wondrous can also be understood according to the preceding meaning, and the stages can be explained accordingly. At the five grades is the vehicle in designation; at purification of the six sense faculties, the vehicle by resemblance; at the forty-one stages, the vehicle through partial realization; and at wondrous awakening, the ultimate vehicle.

7. Integrating the Three Bodies

The track of true nature is the Dharma-body, the track of contemplative illumination is the recompense-body, and the track of supporting accomplishment is the response-body.

The “New Golden Light” says that on the basis of the Dharma-body there can be a recompense-body, and on the basis of the recompense-body there can be a response-body. This is precisely like the preceding explanation that the subtlety of wisdom arises on the basis of the subtlety of objects, and the subtlety of practice arises on the basis of the subtlety of wisdom. Another scripture says that the Buddha’s true Dharma-body is like empty space and appears in response to things like the moon in water. The recompense-body is like the moon in the sky.

The scripture cited by this treatise says that the Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle. This is the body of the true mark, like empty space. It also says that he is adorned by the powers of concentration and wisdom: wisdom is like the moon in the sky, while concentration is like the moon in water. It further says that only a buddha together with a buddha can ultimately exhaust the true mark of all dharmas; this is the Dharma-body. “The wisdom I have attained is wondrous and foremost” is the recompense-body. “His name is universally heard” is the response-body.

Not being born yet manifesting birth and the like belongs to the response-body. Sometimes the Buddha manifests his own body, which is the Dharma-body and recompense-body; sometimes he manifests another’s body, which is the recompense-body and response-body. It is further said: “I adorn my body with marks, light illuminates the ten directions, and I teach the seal of the true mark for sentient beings.” The seal of the true mark is the Dharma-body, illumination of the ten directions is the response-body, and the body adorned with marks is the recompense-body. It is also said that deeply penetrating the characteristics of wrongdoing and merit and universally illuminating the ten directions is the recompense-body; the wondrous and pure Dharma-body is the Dharma-body; and possessing the thirty-two marks is the response-body.

Thus, the three tracks differ only in name and mean the three bodies. The Sūtra on the Practice of Contemplating Bodhisattva Samantabhadra says that the Buddha’s three kinds of body arise from the vaipulya teachings. The Treatise on the Nature of the Dharma Realm uses the simile of mercury combined with true gold, which can coat images of many colors: qualities combined with the Dharma-body can likewise appear responsively everywhere.

When these three bodies are neither vertical nor horizontal, they are wondrous. When the three bodies are decisively understood as all entering the Dharma-body, they are likewise wondrous. The wondrousness of the various stages can also be explained accordingly.

8. Integrating the Three Nirvāṇas

Masters of the Treatise on the Ten Grounds say that there are only two kinds: nirvāṇa of intrinsic purity and nirvāṇa of expedient purity. The true mark is called nirvāṇa of intrinsic purity, while what is accomplished through cultivated causes is called nirvāṇa of expedient purity.

Here, however, originally endowed principle is called nirvāṇa of intrinsic purity, while what is accomplished through cultivated causes is called nirvāṇa of complete purity; this better accords with the meaning. The exhaustion of fuel and extinction of fire is called nirvāṇa of expedient purity, which better accords with the scriptural wording. If what is accomplished through cultivated causes is called nirvāṇa of expedient purity, what kind of nirvāṇa would the exhaustion of fuel and extinction of fire be? Thus, one knows that there should be three kinds of nirvāṇa, and these three nirvāṇas are the three tracks.

The scripture says that this Dharma cannot be shown and the characteristics of words are quiescent and extinct; it also says that all Dharmas from the beginning constantly bear the characteristics of quiescent extinction. This is nirvāṇa of intrinsic purity. It further says that all are made to attain extinction through the Tathāgata’s extinction. This is nirvāṇa of complete purity. It also says that since I became a buddha, an exceedingly long time has passed. This was attained through the long cultivation of karmic practices, with the light of wisdom illuminating immeasurably; it too belongs to nirvāṇa of complete purity.

Repeatedly proclaiming birth, manifesting extinction everywhere, and even attaining extinction on this very night like fire going out when its fuel is spent—how could this not be nirvāṇa of expedient purity?

The title of the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra is “Great Parinirvāṇa,” translated as great extinction and crossing over. “Great” refers to the breadth of its nature and is explained through intrinsic purity. “Crossing over” means reaching the other shore and the fulfillment of wisdom and is explained through complete purity. “Extinction” means that afflictions are forever exhausted and the virtue of severance accomplished and is explained through expedient purity. These three nirvāṇas are the three tracks.

9. Integrating the Three Jewels in One Substance

The track of true nature is the Dharma Jewel, the track of contemplative illumination is the Buddha Jewel, and the track of supporting accomplishment is the Saṅgha Jewel.

Dharma-nature is unmoving and is not itself called awakening. Buddha-wisdom accords with principle, so Buddha is called awakened. The Saṅgha is called harmonious because there is harmony in phenomena and harmony in principle. The Viseṣacintibrahma-paripṛcchā Sūtra says: knowing awakening is called Buddha, knowing separation is called Dharma, and knowing nothingness is called Saṅgha. These are the Three Jewels in one substance.

A later passage therefore says that the Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle: Buddha is the Buddha Jewel and the Great Vehicle the Dharma Jewel. It also says that according to the Dharma he has attained, he uses it to liberate sentient beings. This means harmony above with principle and harmony below with sentient beings and is therefore the Saṅgha Jewel. “The characteristics of the world constantly abide” is the Dharma Jewel. “Knowing at the place of awakening” is the Buddha Jewel. “The guide teaches through skillful means” means harmony above with principle and harmony below with sentient beings and is the Saṅgha Jewel.

The Three Jewels in one substance are one substance without erasing the three, and three without separating from one another. These three and one are neither vertical nor horizontal and are therefore called wondrous. The stages can also be explained accordingly.

10. Integrating the Three Virtues

The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra teaches that the three virtues together accomplish great nirvāṇa; the present scripture teaches that the three tracks together accomplish the Great Vehicle. The former teaches the virtue of Dharma-body, while the present scripture teaches the true mark. The former says that buddha-nature is also one because all sentient beings possess the One Vehicle, which is likewise to point out the true mark as the One Vehicle.

The former teaches the virtue of prajñā. The present scripture says that the Buddha’s gateway of wisdom is difficult to understand and difficult to enter. It further says that the wisdom I have attained is wondrous and foremost, continuing through decisively clarifying the Dharma of śrāvakas and being king among the scriptures. All these belong to prajñā.

The former teaches the virtue of liberation. The present scripture says that the Buddha manifests repeatedly, manifesting birth and manifesting extinction wherever sentient beings should be trained. The Buddha himself is free of fetters and also brings others to liberation; he gathers the merits in all wholesome activities and enables sentient beings to realize the fruit. How could this not be liberation?

The meanings of the two scriptures agree, yet dull people who fail to examine them understand them differently merely because the names differ. This is like hearing the name Heavenly Lord and not recognizing that it is Kauśika. They know only the passages on buddha-nature in the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra but fail to see that beneath the twin śāla trees there is also the purport of the One Vehicle. That scripture itself says that buddha-nature is also one, and one is the One Vehicle. Yet some say that only the One Vehicle of the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra is buddha-nature, while the One Vehicle of the Lotus Sutra is not buddha-nature.

If the Lotus Sutra did not reveal buddha-nature, the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra should not refer back to eight thousand śrāvakas receiving predictions in the Lotus Sutra, like autumn harvest and winter storage, seeing the Tathāgata’s nature, and having nothing further to do. Some again say that although the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra has this passage referring back, the present scripture does not contain the term buddha-nature.

Now, according to the present scripture, the Buddha says that he has seen all the meanings of the various natures and characteristics. Since it says “various,” why should buddha-nature alone be excluded? The scripture further says that the characteristics of the world constantly abide, that this was known at the place of awakening, and that the guide teaches it through skillful means. Is this not wording concerning buddha-nature? The treatise also speaks of “the water of buddha-nature [and] Never Disparaging,” showing that Never Disparaging knew sentient beings possess buddha-nature.

The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra further takes the three virtues as the secret treasury, saying that the children are placed in the secret treasury and that the Buddha himself will soon enter it. This means that both self and others enter the secret. The present scripture says that the Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and uses it to liberate sentient beings; he will never use the Lesser Vehicle to save sentient beings, but will make them all attain extinction through the Tathāgata’s extinction. This likewise means that self and others both enter the Tathāgata’s extinction. Extinction is nirvāṇa, and nirvāṇa is the secret treasury. The “Commentary Treatise” says that the Lotus Sutra is the secret treasury; the wording and meaning of the two scriptures have always plainly agreed.

Why must people force the two to oppose one another? If wording and meaning truly conflicted, there would still be no fault in understanding them as the same. Here wording and meaning originally agree; what benefit could there be in forcibly separating them? The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra simply takes buddha-nature as its purport without failing to teach the meaning of the One Vehicle, while the present scripture takes the One Vehicle as its purport without failing to teach the meaning of buddha-nature. The teaching differs in response to capacities, while the meaning penetrated remains continuous.

If the three virtues are understood as vertically sequential or horizontally divided, they are coarse. When the three virtues are neither vertical nor horizontal, they are wondrous. The stages can also be explained accordingly.

Seventh Gate: Resolving Questions through the Four Siddhāntas

Someone asks: if the ten sets of three dharmas and all other sets of three dharmas are the three tracks, should one not speak only of the three tracks? Why establish various different names?

Answer: The capacities and needs of sentient beings differ. Teachings should therefore be established according to capacities so that they precisely meet them. These are simply the skillful means of the four siddhāntas used to draw in sentient beings. The teaching differs in accord with worldly usage; it differs in accord with what is suitable for each; it differs according to what each must counteract; and it differs in order to bring sentient beings into the Buddha-path.

Giving three in the morning and four at night pacifies the monkeys and makes them all happy. A mother smears something bitter on her breast, then after the medicine has taken effect washes it clean with water and calls the infant to nurse; in this way she cares for the infant in accord with the right time. Skillful means respond to capacities, taking square or round form entirely according to what receives them. It is like a thousand carts traveling in the same track. How could one rigidly cling to a single name and doubt all the others?

The four siddhāntas are now applied throughout the ten sets of three dharmas to judge wondrous and not-wondrous. A complete teaching of the three tracks together accomplishes the Great Vehicle. Within the Great Vehicle, the three dharmas and all Dharmas are fully present without being confused with one another; this is the worldly siddhānta. Supporting accomplishment supports the arising of wisdom and causes wholesome Dharmas to arise; this is the individually adapted siddhānta. Contemplative illumination breaks delusion and causes the various evils to be extinguished; this is the counteractive siddhānta. True nature is real principle; this is the siddhānta of ultimate meaning. One class of sentient beings is suited to hearing the name Great Vehicle and thereby obtains the four benefits.

A complete teaching of the three virtues together accomplishes great nirvāṇa. Although the three dots may be drawn one above another, they are not vertically ordered before and after; they may also be described as inner and outer, yet are not horizontally divided. One is not confused with the three, and the three do not leave the one substance; this is the worldly siddhānta. Wholesome benefit arises, calamity and the burden of wrongdoing cannot invade, and one therefore stands free beyond fetters; thus liberation is the individually adapted siddhānta. Prajñā is like a vajra, shattering whatever it strikes; this is the counteractive siddhānta. The Dharma-body is the siddhānta of ultimate meaning. One class of sentient beings hears the name three virtues and thereby obtains the four benefits. Here the first set, the three tracks, and the last, the three virtues, are presented; the intervening eight sets can be understood by analogy.

Next, wondrous and not-wondrous are distinguished. The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom says that the first three siddhāntas are conventional truth and are where the mind can operate; they can be broken and destroyed. The siddhānta of ultimate meaning is where the mind cannot operate, the Dharma attained by the minds of buddhas and noble ones; it cannot be broken and destroyed and is true truth.

If so, the four siddhāntas are encompassed by the conventional and true Two Truths. Yet there is also the Middle Way—where would it be included? If the Middle is not included, this is only the meaning of the Tripiṭaka and Shared Teachings, and such siddhāntas are coarse.

Here conventional truth is said to be existence and true truth nonexistence. When existence and nonexistence remain separate, they are precisely the first three siddhāntas where the mind can operate and which can be destroyed. The Middle Way as ultimate meaning is neither existence nor nonexistence. When existence and nonexistence are nondual, there is no separation; only where there is no difference is there true truth. The first three siddhāntas reach only the conjured city. The conjured city is not real and can therefore be destroyed; what can be destroyed is coarse. Here the Middle Way is without difference and reaches all the way to the treasure-place. Nothing can surpass it and nothing can extinguish it, so it cannot be destroyed and is called wondrous.

If other scriptures also teach the Middle Way as the siddhānta of ultimate meaning, they do not differ from the present scripture. They are not called wondrous only because they also carry what arhats attain as the siddhānta of ultimate meaning. The present scripture directly casts aside skillful means and contains only the perfect and real four siddhāntas; it is therefore wondrous.

If one cannot decisively understand that each of the first three siddhāntas enters the siddhānta of ultimate meaning, they remain coarse. If one decisively understands that each siddhānta itself possesses ultimate meaning, it is wondrous.

Disciples of the five grades possess the four siddhāntas in designation. Those at purification of the six sense faculties possess the four siddhāntas by resemblance. Those from the first abode through equal awakening possess the four siddhāntas through partial realization. At wondrous awakening are the ultimate four siddhāntas. They are therefore called wondrous.

The preceding five treatments have clarified the half concerning the wondrousness of self-practice within the ten subtleties, from cause through fruit. At this point, the work’s structure of the half wish-fulfilling jewel is complete.

義疏Exposition

問:真性、觀照、資成既然只是一大乘法,為何不直說一法,反而立三個名稱?

答:若只說一,容易把真實理解成一個孤立而無作用的本體;若只說三,又容易把三者排成先後或分居左右。三法之妙,正在三不被固定為三,一也不被固定為一。說三時沒有離開一,說一時也不抹去三。

因此,這一番不是替大乘增加三個部件,而是說明妙位所住之法如何成為軌範:真性是所依的實理,觀照是寂而常照,資成是含藏眾行。三者不可單取,也不可合成一團;不是三件並列之物,也不是三段前後相生的階梯。

一點、三點與一眼、三眼

三法像一個伊字的三點,又像一面有三眼而同見的天目。三點各有位置,卻共同成字;三眼可以分說,所屬卻是一面。這兩個譬喻都不容人把三者疊成一點,也不容人把它們拆成互不相干的三物。

第一義諦、第一義空、如來藏,也是同一法的三種名字。說第一義諦,顯一切眾生全都同有一乘;說如來藏,顯其中可開出種種法數;說第一義空,顯數與非數都不可固定。每一面都鄭重說『也』,不是猶豫,而是不許任何一個名稱獨佔全體。

這也回答一個緊接而來的疑問:境、智、行與位,前文不是早已說過嗎?為何到三法妙又重說一次?

前面所說的境、智、行,是因中所乘;此處從大乘果位回看,是到達道場後所證、所住。前面分別使用境、智、行等名稱,此處總攝為三法;前面散說各相,未曾貫通本末,此處則從本具的性德說到修成的祕密藏。由名字而觀行,由觀行而相似,由相似而分證,直到究竟;自己成就三法,也用三法化他。重說不是重複文字,而是換了一個能看見全程的位置。

智者的講說至此已把重說三義交代完整。其後,記者另加一段私釋,提出一句即三句、三句即一句,又依三句分別說明方便如何從圓滿的一乘開出。把這層語氣辨清,才能同時看見講者的主幹與記者的申明,不把兩人的聲音混作同一段自說。

方便從哪裏開出,又要合回哪裏

要逐一說三法,先須明白開與合。佛並不是在一乘以外找到幾種較小的法,再把它們搬進來;祂從如來藏所含攝的事法中,隨眾生所堪開出聲聞、緣覺與菩薩的不同乘。因為這些都是方便,所以仍為大乘所攝;分說三、五、七、九乘,也都沒有離開一佛乘。

三藏教以智慧作觀照,以助道功德作資成,以斷惑所見之真作真性。教能運人出三界,到了所證之處,言教的運載便止;所證之真本身又不再運,所以行人仍有求取大車之意。

通教直接在事中見理,以真性為乘體,以即空智慧為觀照,以眾行為資成。它的教同樣能運人出界,菩薩又以行淨佛國土、化度眾生;但到所住之處,教說退謝,運義也隨證而寂。

別教以觀照智慧破惑顯理,又以眾行資助智慧。問題在於,若把理說成道前本有,把隨順真如的智慧與熏習所得安排在後,三者就前後豎列;若又把種子、智慧與真如收在不同識中,三者便左右橫隔。這樣的說法可以作一時方便,卻不可執為究竟。

智者在這裏責備的不是學習經論,而是未先鬆開舊執,便抓住新文字。舊見慢尚未降伏,又封執阿黎耶識能生一切法,像長冰再添水,使冰層愈厚。即使所說為實,執著仍成語見,如同讓嬰兒含食過多酥乳,恐怕會使嬰兒夭折。善解破與立,是知道空用來洗著,分別用來應機;病除可以進食,食後還須消化,不能再把藥食變成新的封閉。

圓教則只在真性本身點出三面。真性不虛不改,是車體;真性寂而常照,便名觀照;真性法界含藏無量眾行,便名資成。就像如意珠中可說珠、光與寶:光與寶不等於珠,卻沒有離珠另在一處。

三障不是擋在三軌外面

迷失三法,便顯為三障。塵沙障遮住如來藏,見思障遮住第一義空,根本無明遮住第一義理。若把障礙想成覆在真實外面的一層硬殼,修行便成先搬走一物,再取得另一物;本論卻反覆說『就在其中通達』。

就在塵沙障中通達無量法門,資成顯露;就在見思障中通達第一義空,觀照顯露;就在無明障中通達第一義諦,真性顯露。障沒有被宣布為另一種永恆實體,三軌也不是從遠處移來。迷時稱障,達時稱軌。

真性顯露名法身,觀照顯露名般若,資成顯露名解脫。般若與解脫如定慧莊嚴法身:法身是車體,定慧是車上眾具。車身高廣,以眾寶莊校,並非先有一輛空車,再把無關的裝飾掛上;車體與具度共同成就可乘的大車。

行人乘車到達,是否表示車從此消失?就自行說,運載完成,乘義可以暫止;就化他說,還須運載眾生,乘義並不停止。御者駕車抵達目的地,工具仍名為車;佛安住大乘,仍以定慧力莊嚴所得之法,用它度化眾生。

再深一層,乘也不必只按『運』解釋。真性不動不出,不可只說運,也不可說全然不運;觀照與資成能動能出,所以可名為運。可是作用不離本體,動出當下不離不動出;本體也不離作用,不動出當下仍能動出。發趣與不發趣,都可在這層體用不二中名乘。

粗與妙,不是把舊車丟掉換新車

判粗妙時,三藏、通、別三教的三法各有運載作用,卻仍留下偏真、前後或橫隔。圓教的妙,不只是多加一個更高目的地,而是不再把實相、空、藏排成不同位置。

若點實相為第一義空,空並不因此落成前後之縱;若點實相為如來藏,藏也不因此落成左右之橫。實相就是空,空就是藏,三者輾轉相即。不能用縱來想,也不能用橫來想,才叫不可思議。

大車的圖像把這一點展開。從如來藏說廣,所以車身廣大,又有眾寶莊校、僕從侍衛;從第一義空說高,所以有大白牛,肥壯多力,行步平正,奔走如風。白是不染,多力是能破惑,平正是中道智慧,如風是進入無功用行。車身、莊嚴與白牛不是三輛車,三法共同成為一輛大車。

開粗顯妙也不是毀掉各種方便。家中大小原來都不知道自家藏有寶物,如今只是指示本有寶藏,耘除草穢,開顯藏金。三乘、五乘、七乘所行的事善與偏真,若被執為終點便粗;若決了它們當下為如來藏,不改動原有法便入於妙。

這個開顯同時鬆開對數與非數的執著。若認定某一種緣修智慧必定在外面顯出一個理,智慧與理便彼此分離。如今說智慧當下是理,理當下是智慧;不把三、一或非三非一固定成答案。這種無著妙慧像輪王既破亂又安民,像太陽既除暗又生養萬物,也像醫師既除眼膜又養護眼珠。破除不是留下荒地,而是使本有作用完整顯露。

開始不在遠處,就在凡夫一念

三法若只在果位才有,凡夫憑甚麼開始?本論不把五品教乘取作最初,而從凡夫一念心說起。一念具十法界,每一界具十種如是;十如又可由真性、觀照、資成三軌讀出。

如是體屬真性;由內說性、由外說相,分屬觀照與資成。力、因、果屬觀照,作、緣、報屬資成;本末究竟等,又可由空、假、中三面貫通。這不是把十項勉強分裝,而是看一界十如如何同時具有所依、能照與助成。

再由一界推到一念十界,每一界都有煩惱、惡業、苦道的性相。三法的開始,竟不是先離開這三道,而是看清三道當下的性相。

無明因迷於明而起;若了解無明,當下就是明。明不在無明之外,如冰就是水,水就是冰。這並非說迷與悟毫無差別,而是說轉迷沒有另一種材料;冰融時顯水,所轉與所成不相離。

惡的性相也就是善的性相。由惡才有可翻轉的善,離惡另覓善,資成便失去所資。竹中有火性,尚未遇緣成火事,所以有而不燒;一旦火生,又回頭燒竹。惡中之善也是如此:未遇緣時尚未成事,善事成就,便反過來破惡。

苦道與法身也不是南北各有一物。迷南為北,並不表示真正的南方從此搬走;只要悟知方向,北的誤認當下解除。迷於識、名色等苦道,生死便浩然;悟生死時,生死當下就是法身,並非捨去苦道而另取法身。

所以有心者本具三道性相,也就是三軌性相。當菩提心發起,三法開始萌動;觀照的因漸成般若之果,資成的緣漸成解脫之報,法身也隨果報圓滿。幽隱時不縱不橫,彰顯時仍不縱不橫;始終所變的是迷悟與顯隱,不是三法忽然從無變有。

十組名稱,走的是同一條路

前面由本具說到究竟,是豎向貫通;接著以三軌會通十組三法,是橫向貫通。名稱因緣機而異,義旨卻能相通。十組並非十套互不相涉的圖表,而是從生死輪迴起步,直到化緣窮盡、安住祕密藏的一條路。

第一是三道。苦道通真性,煩惱道通觀照,業道通資成。薪能生火,火又燒薪;迷惑正是觀照所照,惡業也能成為忍辱、教化與不退的助緣。所謂行於非道而通達佛道,不是讚美惡行,而是沒有把任何一段生命永遠逐出佛道。

第二是三識。菴摩羅、阿黎耶、阿陀那分別與真性、觀照、資成相通。論主不用水火般互斥的三個實體理解它們,而以同一人起善心、惡心、無記心作近譬。阿黎耶中生死種子熏長,成為分別;智慧種子由聞熏增長,轉依而名淨識。金、土、染、淨的譬喻,顯示染淨雖別,所依並非斷裂。

衣珠譬又把這層關係說得更近。醉臥如識中迷覆,狂惑遊行、求取衣食如分別活動,親友指出衣中寶珠如無分別智光漸顯。寶珠不是後來縫進衣服,聞熏卻使本來未用的寶物被看見、被受用。

第三到第六,從本具之因走向智慧、發心與實踐。正因、了因、緣因三佛性,通真性、觀照、資成;實相、觀照、文字三般若,也通三軌。實相菩提、實智菩提、方便菩提,把佛與弟子的成道因緣都攝入;理乘、隨乘、得乘,則分別說所住之理、隨順的定慧與所證所得。每一組都保留三者的功能,也都不把它們拆給三個彼此隔離的人。

第七是三身。法身如虛空,報身如天月,應身如水中月。又如水銀和合真金,能塗飾種種色像;功德和合法身,便能處處應現。法、報、應不是由本體到影像的三段遠路,而是在一身中顯不動之體、智慧莊嚴與隨機應現。

第八是三涅槃。性淨依本具廣博說,圓淨依修因圓滿、智慧到彼岸說,方便淨依煩惱永盡、如薪盡火滅說。若只立前兩種,便無處安放薪盡火滅;立三種,才使『大、滅、度』三義各得其位,又共同成為一個大般涅槃。

第九是一體三寶。真性通法寶,觀照通佛寶,資成通僧寶。法性不動,佛智覺理,僧在事與理上和合。一體不抹掉三種作用,三寶也不離一體,因此不縱不橫。

第十是三德。法身、般若、解脫共同成大涅槃,正如實相、智慧與種種利益共同成大乘。兩部經雖一部以佛性為宗,一部以一乘為宗,卻不是一部只有佛性而無一乘,另一部只有一乘而無佛性。因應根機,說法名稱可以不同;使佛與眾生同入祕密、同得滅度,義旨始終相通。

從三道到三德,輪迴並未被割在道路之外,證果也沒有成為與初心得到無關的另一套三法。三道由理性、觀行、相似、分真直到究竟;三菩提由理性、名字、相似、分真直到究竟。位次有淺深,三法的體則從始至終不缺。

名稱既異,如何不是各說各話

最後一問最直接:若十種三法與其餘一切全是三軌,何不永遠只說三軌?

答案不在名稱本身,而在聽者。有人須先在可理解的差別中建立世界,有人須使已有善根生長,有人須以相應法藥破除惡病,有人可以直入第一義。隨俗、隨宜、對治、入道四種利益不同,說法名稱也就不同。

朝三暮四,數目隨宜更換,是為使群猴都歡喜;母親先以苦物塗乳,藥消後洗淨乳房,再適時哺育孩子。方器受方形,圓器受圓形,全任所接之物;千輛車雖各有形制,所循卻是同一車轍。方便之異不等於目的互相衝突。

以三軌說,三法各不混亂,是世界;資成使智慧發起、善法生長,是為人;觀照破惑除惡,是對治;真性實理,是第一義。以三德說,一與三互不混亂也互不分離,是世界;解脫使善利成就、罪累不干,是為人;般若如金剛,所向皆碎,是對治;法身是第一義。最初與最後如此,中間八組也依此領會。

粗妙之分,便不在前三種利益一定粗、最後一種一定妙。若俗有與真無永遠隔開,所到只是可以捨去的化城;若有無不二,中道無隔,每一悉檀都含第一義,便能到不可破壞的寶所。五品是假名四悉檀,六根清淨是相似,初住至等覺是分真,妙覺是究竟。名字與位次隨機展開,最後仍回到不縱不橫的一乘。

這一番至此完成從因到果的自行之妙。所謂半如意珠,不是只得到半個殘缺真理,而是全書已說完自行的一半,另一面的展開仍在後文。

釋籤之眼

湛然在《法華玄義釋籤》中,先把七門照成一條有方向的次第:總明是唯一妙而無差別;眾生根機不純,才從總開別;教門既異,須判粗妙;判的用意正在開;開後純妙,才可說始終;妙軌遍攝,所以再作類通;最後用悉檀總料簡前面諸義。如此一照,七門不是七篇偶然相接的文章,而是每一步都回答上一步留下的問題。

鏡中又特別標出傳述層次。重說三義是智者講說的正文;『私謂』以下則是章安灌頂的附語,而且是在再治定時加入,才能回指記中已有之文。這個辨別不削弱附語的價值,反而使它的工作更清楚:講說先由本末、因果、自他說明為何重說;記者再以一句即三句,解釋三句如何各開方便而皆從圓出。

歷別四教時,鏡中把各段乘體分得很嚴。藏、別兩教以智慧為體,通、圓兩教以真性為體;圓教又先略說三法,再說三障,繼而由破障顯軌收成三德。這個次第防止讀者把圓教的配屬倒灌到前三教,也防止把三障、顯軌、三德壓縮成一句抽象的『煩惱即菩提』。

對別教長段,湛然判為先正明三軌,次引他說辨非,最後結示。論主所斥,是未遣執著便妄計阿黎耶識生一切法;不是把所有相關經論一概否定。湛然又判,依實起見尚損慧命。到圓教段,他又以『真性始終不動而為車體』照明非運而運:自行到達,化他仍行,車體與眾具不可互相取代。

鏡中還把車體與具度分開照明:車體就理性說,眾寶與白牛就修德說;兩者相即,不能因莊嚴具足而遺失車體,也不能只守車體而省去能運之具。三身月譬亦同:天月表自受用報身,水月隨水多現,表應身;多影不使本月分裂。

判與開的兩段,鏡中也各守其事。判粗妙先約四教、再約五味;開粗顯妙則把佛性三句分別照向所開對象。『其家』被釋作五陰,家中大小不知寶藏,顯示開不是新造佛性,而是使昔日被覆的本有覺藏今日顯露。始終一門先泛約一界十如,再收在凡夫一念十界;凡位若全無三法,便根本無物可開,所以始終不能從修行中途才算起。

十組三法在鏡中被收成一條始終鏈:起於所化眾生的極迷,終於能化者化緣已盡而入滅;每一條又都能歷理性、名字、觀行、相似、分真、究竟六個層次。這避免兩種誤讀:一是把十組只讀成名詞對照表,二是為了整齊而另造本論沒有說過的逐項數目對應。名稱雖多,本文只在顯示同一乘的因果。

悉檀料簡中,湛然指出正文只詳最初三軌與最後三德,其餘八組照例可知。判粗之後還有開粗:若把前三悉檀永遠判作可壞,便仍未見本文所說每一悉檀都可具第一義。這裏四悉檀都須從不可思議處讀,才不會把應機之門封成固定等級。

末後『半如意珠』也由鏡中定準。十法共同成就如意珠法,三法妙位居前十妙的第五;至此自行因果已滿,只是相對尚未展開的化他一面,所以名半珠。半不是所說真理殘缺,而是整部玄義的行程刻度:一半已圓滿收束,下一半將由自行轉向化他。

Question: If true nature, contemplative illumination, and supporting accomplishment are only one Great Vehicle Dharma, why not speak directly of one Dharma instead of establishing three names?

Answer: If one speaks only of one, reality can easily be understood as an isolated substance without function. If one speaks only of three, the three can easily be placed in a sequence or set side by side. The subtlety of the three dharmas lies precisely in the fact that three are not fixed as three, while one is not fixed as one. When three are spoken, they have not departed from one; when one is spoken, the three have not been erased.

This section therefore does not add three components to the Great Vehicle. It explains how the Dharma in which wondrous stages abide becomes a normative track: true nature is the real principle relied upon, contemplative illumination is quiescent yet constantly illuminating, and supporting accomplishment contains the multitude of practices. The three cannot be taken singly, nor can they be fused into an undifferentiated mass. They are neither three objects placed alongside one another nor three steps that arise successively.

One Dot, Three Dots; One Eye, Three Eyes

The three dharmas are like the three dots of the siddham letter i, and like three eyes seeing together on one face. The three dots occupy distinct positions yet together form the letter; the three eyes can be discussed separately yet belong to one face. Neither simile permits the three to be piled into one dot, nor does either permit them to be split into three unrelated objects.

Ultimate truth, the emptiness of ultimate meaning, and the tathāgata-garbha are likewise three names for one Dharma. Ultimate truth discloses that all sentient beings alike possess the One Vehicle. The tathāgata-garbha discloses that various enumerated dharmas can be opened from within it. The emptiness of ultimate meaning discloses that enumerated and non-enumerated dharmas cannot be fixed. Each aspect is emphatically qualified as “also,” not out of hesitation, but so that no one name may monopolize the whole.

This also answers the question that immediately follows: were objects, wisdom, practice, and stages not already explained? Why are they stated again under the subtlety of the three dharmas?

The objects, wisdom, and practice previously discussed are the three tracks ridden in the causal stage. Here they are viewed from the fruit-stage of the Great Vehicle, as what is realized and abided in after reaching the place of awakening. Previously the distinct names objects, wisdom, and practice were used; here they are gathered together as three dharmas. Previously their individual characteristics were explained separately without being connected from beginning to end; here the account extends from the originally endowed three tracks of nature-virtue to the secret treasury accomplished through cultivation. From designation one passes to contemplative practice, from contemplative practice to resemblance, from resemblance to partial realization, and finally to the ultimate. One both accomplishes the three dharmas oneself and uses them to transform others. Repetition here is not repetition of words. It is a change to a vantage point from which the whole course can be seen.

Zhiyi’s teaching has now fully stated the three reasons for repeating the subject. The recorder then adds a private explanation: one statement is immediately three statements, and three statements are immediately one. He further uses the three statements to explain separately how skillful means open from the complete One Vehicle. Keeping this change of voice clear lets one see both the lecturer’s main line and the recorder’s elaboration without merging two speakers into one passage of self-explanation.

From Where Are Skillful Means Opened, and Where Are They Gathered Back?

Before explaining the three dharmas one by one, opening and combining must first be understood. The Buddha does not find several smaller Dharmas outside the One Vehicle and then carry them in. From the phenomena encompassed by the tathāgata-garbha, he opens the different vehicles of śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and bodhisattvas according to what sentient beings can bear. Because these are all skillful means, they remain encompassed by the Great Vehicle. Whether three, five, seven, or nine vehicles are distinguished, none has departed from the One Buddha-Vehicle.

The Tripiṭaka Teaching takes wisdom as contemplative illumination, qualities that assist the path as supporting accomplishment, and the truth seen by severing delusion as true nature. The teaching can carry a person out of the three realms. Once the realization is reached, the carrying work of words comes to an end; the truth realized does not itself continue to carry. Practitioners therefore still wish to seek the great cart.

The Shared Teaching sees principle directly within phenomena. It takes true nature as the substance of the vehicle, wisdom that sees immediate emptiness as contemplative illumination, and the various practices as supporting accomplishment. Its teaching likewise carries a person beyond the realms, and the bodhisattva further uses practice to purify buddha-lands and transform sentient beings. Yet when the abiding place is reached, the teaching withdraws and the meaning of transport becomes quiescent in realization.

The Distinct Teaching uses the wisdom of contemplative illumination to break delusion and reveal principle, with the various practices supporting that wisdom. The problem arises when principle is described as originally present before the path, while wisdom that accords with suchness and what is attained through perfuming are arranged afterward. The three then stand vertically in sequence. If seeds, wisdom, and suchness are in addition gathered into separate consciousnesses, the three become horizontally divided. Such an account may serve as a provisional means for a time, but it cannot be grasped as ultimate.

What Zhiyi rebukes here is not the study of scriptures and treatises, but grasping new words before loosening old attachments. When old views and conceit remain unsubdued and one rigidly holds that ālaya-consciousness produces all Dharmas, it is like adding water to long-standing ice and making the layer of ice still thicker. Even if what is taught is real, attachment to it becomes a view made of words, like feeding an infant too much ghee and endangering its life. To understand establishment and refutation well is to know that emptiness washes away attachment while distinctions respond to capacities. Once an illness has been cured, food can be eaten, but the food must still be digested; neither medicine nor food should be made into a new enclosure.

The Perfect Teaching points out three aspects within true nature itself. True nature is neither false nor changing and is the body of the cart. True nature, quiescent yet constantly illuminating, is called contemplative illumination. The Dharma realm of true nature, containing immeasurable practices, is called supporting accomplishment. It is like speaking of the jewel, its radiance, and its treasure within a wish-fulfilling jewel: radiance and treasure are not identical to the jewel, yet neither exists somewhere apart from it.

The Three Obstructions Do Not Stand Outside the Three Tracks

When the three dharmas are lost in delusion, they appear as three obstructions. Dust-and-sand delusions obscure the tathāgata-garbha, delusions of views and thought obscure the emptiness of ultimate meaning, and fundamental ignorance obscures the principle of ultimate meaning. If obstructions are imagined as hard shells covering reality from outside, practice becomes a matter of first moving one thing away and then acquiring another. The treatise, however, repeatedly says that realization occurs “right within” them.

When immeasurable Dharma gates are penetrated right within dust-and-sand delusions, supporting accomplishment is revealed. When the emptiness of ultimate meaning is penetrated right within delusions of views and thought, contemplative illumination is revealed. When ultimate truth is penetrated right within ignorance, true nature is revealed. An obstruction is not proclaimed to be another eternal entity, nor are the three tracks brought from somewhere far away. In delusion they are called obstructions; in penetration they are called tracks.

When true nature is revealed, it is called Dharma-body. When contemplative illumination is revealed, it is called prajñā. When supporting accomplishment is revealed, it is called liberation. Prajñā and liberation are like the adornment of the Dharma-body by concentration and wisdom: the Dharma-body is the body of the cart, and concentration and wisdom are its equipment. When the cart is high and broad and adorned with many jewels, there was not first an empty vehicle onto which unrelated decorations were hung. The body of the cart and its equipment together accomplish the great vehicle that can be ridden.

When a practitioner rides the cart and arrives, does the cart therefore disappear? In one’s own practice, the carrying has been completed, so the vehicle’s function may temporarily cease. In transforming others, sentient beings must still be carried, so that function does not cease. Even after a driver brings a cart to its destination, the implement is still called a cart. The Buddha abides in the Great Vehicle and continues to adorn the Dharma he has attained with the powers of concentration and wisdom, using it to liberate sentient beings.

At a deeper level, a vehicle need not be explained solely through “transport.” True nature neither moves nor emerges, so it cannot be said only to transport, yet neither can it be said to be wholly without transport. Contemplative illumination and supporting accomplishment can move and emerge, and so are called transport. Yet function does not leave substance: moving and emerging do not depart from not moving and not emerging. Substance likewise does not leave function: not moving and not emerging are immediately able to move and emerge. Setting forth and not setting forth can both be called a vehicle within this nonduality of substance and function.

Coarse and Wondrous: Not Throwing Away an Old Cart for a New One

When coarse and wondrous are judged, the three dharmas of the Tripiṭaka, Shared, and Distinct Teachings each have a carrying function, yet still retain partial truth, temporal sequence, or horizontal division. The wondrousness of the Perfect Teaching does not merely add a higher destination. It no longer arranges the true mark, emptiness, and treasury in different positions.

When the true mark is pointed out as the emptiness of ultimate meaning, emptiness does not thereby become a vertical sequence. When the true mark is pointed out as the tathāgata-garbha, the treasury does not thereby become a horizontal division. The true mark is emptiness, and emptiness is the treasury; the three turn and are identical with one another. Only when they cannot be conceived vertically or horizontally are they called inconceivable.

The image of the great cart unfolds this point. The tathāgata-garbha is spoken of as broad, so the body of the cart is vast, adorned with many jewels, and attended by servants. The emptiness of ultimate meaning is spoken of as high, so there is a great white ox, strong and powerful, walking evenly and running like the wind. White means unstained, power means able to break delusion, evenness means the wisdom of the Middle Way, and swiftness like the wind means entry into effortless practice. The body of the cart, its adornments, and the white ox are not three carts. The three dharmas together make one great cart.

Opening the coarse to reveal the wondrous likewise does not destroy the various skillful means. The old and young in a household originally do not know that their home contains treasure. Now they are simply shown the treasure already present, the weeds are cleared, and the hidden gold is revealed. The phenomenal good and partial truth practiced in the three, five, and seven vehicles are coarse when grasped as final destinations. When they are decisively understood as immediately being the tathāgata-garbha, the original Dharmas need not be altered in order to enter the wondrous.

This opening and revelation also releases attachment to what is enumerated and what is not enumerated. If one insists that a particular cultivated wisdom must reveal a principle outside itself, wisdom and principle become separated. Here wisdom itself is principle and principle itself is wisdom; neither three and one nor neither-three-nor-one is fixed as an answer. Such unattached wondrous wisdom is like a wheel-turning king who both quells disorder and settles the people, like the sun that both dispels darkness and nourishes living things, and like a physician who both removes a film from the eye and cares for the eyeball. Breaking does not leave behind a wasteland; it lets an originally present function become fully manifest.

The Beginning Is Not Far Away: It Is in an Ordinary Person’s Single Thought

If the three dharmas exist only at the fruit-stage, from where could an ordinary person begin? The treatise does not take the teaching-vehicle of the five grades as the beginning. It begins with one thought of an ordinary person. That thought possesses the ten Dharma realms, and each realm possesses the ten suchnesses; the ten suchnesses can in turn be read through the tracks of true nature, contemplative illumination, and supporting accomplishment.

Such-a-substance belongs to true nature. Such-a-nature, spoken from within, and such-a-mark, spoken from without, belong respectively to contemplative illumination and supporting accomplishment. Such-a-power, such-a-cause, and such-a-fruit belong to contemplative illumination; such-a-function, such-a-condition, and such-a-recompense belong to supporting accomplishment. Such-a-consummation-of-beginning-and-end can further be penetrated through the three aspects of emptiness, provisionality, and the Middle. This does not forcibly pack ten items into separate boxes. It shows how the ten suchnesses of one realm simultaneously possess what is relied upon, what illuminates, and what assists accomplishment.

Moving from one realm to the ten realms in one thought, every realm possesses the nature and characteristics of affliction, evil karma, and the path of suffering. The beginning of the three dharmas, surprisingly, is not first to leave these three paths, but to see clearly their nature and characteristics right where they are.

Ignorance arises through delusion about illumination. If ignorance is understood, it is immediately illumination. Illumination does not exist outside ignorance, just as ice is water and water is ice. This does not say that delusion and awakening are indistinguishable. It says that transforming delusion requires no other material: when ice melts, water is revealed, and what is transformed is not separate from what appears.

The nature and characteristics of evil are likewise the nature and characteristics of good. It is because there is evil that there is good capable of transformation; if good is sought apart from evil, supporting accomplishment loses what it supports. Bamboo has the potential for fire, but before conditions make actual fire it possesses that potential without burning. Once fire arises, it turns back and burns the bamboo. Good within evil is the same: before conditions meet it has not yet become an event, but once a wholesome deed is accomplished it turns back to break evil.

The path of suffering and the Dharma-body are not two objects located north and south. Mistaking south for north does not mean the actual south has moved away. When the direction is understood, the mistaken north is released right where it is. When consciousness, name-and-form, and the other elements of suffering are misconstrued, birth-and-death expands without bound. When birth-and-death is awakened to, it is immediately the Dharma-body; the path of suffering is not discarded so that another Dharma-body may be taken up.

Thus, all who have mind inherently possess the nature and characteristics of the three paths, which are immediately the nature and characteristics of the three tracks. When the aspiration for bodhi arises, the three dharmas begin to stir. The cause of contemplative illumination gradually brings the fruit of prajñā to fulfillment; the condition of supporting accomplishment gradually brings the recompense-fruit of liberation to fulfillment; and the Dharma-body is fulfilled together with fruit and recompense. Concealed, the three are neither vertical nor horizontal; manifest, they remain neither vertical nor horizontal. What changes from beginning to end is delusion and awakening, concealment and manifestation—not the sudden production of the three dharmas from nothing.

Ten Sets of Names, One Road

The preceding account extends vertically from original endowment to the ultimate. Next the three tracks are used to connect horizontally ten sets of three dharmas. Their names differ in response to causes and capacities, yet their purport can be mutually understood. The ten sets are not ten unrelated charts. Together they form one road beginning in the round of birth-and-death and ending when the conditions for transformation are exhausted and one abides in the secret treasury.

First are the three paths. The path of suffering corresponds to true nature, the path of affliction to contemplative illumination, and the path of karma to supporting accomplishment. Fire arises from fuel and then burns it; delusion is precisely what contemplative illumination illuminates, while evil karma can itself become a condition assisting patience, transformation, and nonretrogression. To “practice in what is not the path and penetrate the Buddha-path” does not praise evil action. It refuses to banish any part of life forever from the Buddha-path.

Second are the three consciousnesses. Amala-, ālaya-, and ādāna-consciousness correspond respectively to true nature, contemplative illumination, and supporting accomplishment. The treatise master does not understand them as three mutually exclusive entities like water and fire, but uses the near simile of one person giving rise to a wholesome, unwholesome, or karmically indeterminate mind. When the seeds of birth-and-death in ālaya are perfumed and grow, discrimination arises; when seeds of wisdom grow through the perfuming of hearing, the basis is transformed and it is called pure consciousness. The simile of gold, earth, defilement, and purity shows that defiled and pure differ without their basis being severed.

The jewel-in-the-robe simile brings this relation still closer. Lying drunk is like consciousness obscured in delusion. Wandering in confusion and seeking food and clothing are like discriminative activity. A close friend pointing out the jewel in the robe is like the gradual revelation of the light of nondiscriminating wisdom. The jewel was not sewn into the robe later, yet the perfuming of hearing allows the treasure that had not been used to be seen and employed.

The third through sixth sets move from inherent causes toward wisdom, aspiration, and practice. The three buddha-natures as direct cause, understanding cause, and conditioning cause correspond to true nature, contemplative illumination, and supporting accomplishment. The prajñās of the true mark, contemplative illumination, and written words likewise correspond to the three tracks. The bodhis of the true mark, real wisdom, and skillful means gather both the Buddha’s and disciples’ conditions for awakening. The vehicles of principle, accompaniment, and attainment respectively state the principle in which one abides, the concentration and wisdom that accord with it, and what is realized and attained. Every set preserves three functions without assigning them to three mutually isolated people.

Seventh are the three bodies. The Dharma-body is like empty space, the recompense-body like the moon in the sky, and the response-body like the moon in water. Another simile says that mercury combined with true gold can coat images of many colors; in the same way, qualities combined with the Dharma-body can appear responsively everywhere. Dharma-, recompense-, and response-body are not three distant stages running from substance to image. Within one body they display unmoving substance, the adornment of wisdom, and appearance according to capacities.

Eighth are the three nirvāṇas. Intrinsic purity is spoken from the breadth of original endowment. Complete purity is spoken from the fulfillment of cultivated causes and wisdom’s arrival at the other shore. Expedient purity is spoken from the final exhaustion of affliction, like fire going out when its fuel is spent. If only the first two are established, there is nowhere to place the exhaustion of fuel and extinction of fire. Establishing three allows “great,” “extinction,” and “crossing over” each to have its place while together forming one great parinirvāṇa.

Ninth are the Three Jewels in one substance. True nature corresponds to the Dharma Jewel, contemplative illumination to the Buddha Jewel, and supporting accomplishment to the Saṅgha Jewel. Dharma-nature is unmoving, Buddha-wisdom awakens to principle, and the Saṅgha harmonizes in both phenomena and principle. One substance does not erase the three functions, and the Three Jewels do not depart from the one substance; thus they are neither vertical nor horizontal.

Tenth are the three virtues. Dharma-body, prajñā, and liberation together constitute great nirvāṇa, just as the true mark, wisdom, and the various benefits together constitute the Great Vehicle. Although one scripture takes buddha-nature as its purport and the other the One Vehicle, this does not mean that the first has buddha-nature but no One Vehicle, or that the second has a One Vehicle but no buddha-nature. Names in the teaching can differ in response to capacities. Its purport remains continuous in bringing both buddhas and sentient beings into the secret and enabling both to attain extinction.

From the three paths to the three virtues, saṃsāra has not been cut off from the road, nor has realization become another set of three dharmas unrelated to the initial aspiration. The three paths extend through principle, contemplative practice, resemblance, partial realization, and the ultimate. The three bodhis extend through principle, designation, resemblance, partial realization, and the ultimate. Stages differ in depth, but the substance of the three dharmas is never absent from beginning to end.

If the Names Differ, Why Are They Not Unrelated Teachings?

The final question is direct: if the ten sets of three dharmas and all the rest are the three tracks, why not always speak only of the three tracks?

The answer lies not in the names themselves but in those who hear. Some must first establish a world through distinctions they can understand; some must make existing wholesome roots grow; some must use the corresponding Dharma-medicine to break an evil illness; and some can directly enter ultimate meaning. Because the four benefits of according with worldly usage, according with what is suitable, counteracting, and entering the path differ, the names in the teaching also differ.

Giving three in the morning and four at night adjusts numbers as appropriate so that all the monkeys are pleased. A mother first smears something bitter on her breast; when the medicine has taken effect, she washes the breast clean and nurses her child at the right time. A square vessel receives a square shape and a round vessel a round shape, entirely according to what receives. A thousand carts may differ in construction while following the same track. Difference among skillful means does not mean their aims conflict.

In terms of the three tracks, the three dharmas remain unmixed, which is the worldly siddhānta. Supporting accomplishment makes wisdom arise and wholesome dharmas grow, which is the individually adapted siddhānta. Contemplative illumination breaks delusion and removes evil, which is the counteractive siddhānta. True nature as real principle is the siddhānta of ultimate meaning. In terms of the three virtues, one and three remain neither confused nor separate, which is the worldly siddhānta. Liberation brings wholesome benefit to accomplishment while wrongdoing and its burdens do not interfere, which is the individually adapted siddhānta. Prajñā is like a vajra, shattering whatever it faces, which is the counteractive siddhānta. The Dharma-body is ultimate meaning. The first and last are explained in this way; the intervening eight sets are understood by analogy.

The distinction between coarse and wondrous therefore does not mean that the first three benefits are invariably coarse and the last invariably wondrous. If conventional existence and true nonexistence remain forever separated, they reach only a conjured city that can be abandoned. If existence and nonexistence are nondual and the Middle Way is without division, every siddhānta contains ultimate meaning and can reach the indestructible treasure-place. The five grades possess the four siddhāntas in designation, purification of the six sense faculties possesses them in resemblance, the first abode through equal awakening possesses them in partial realization, and wondrous awakening possesses them ultimately. Names and stages unfold according to capacities, yet finally return to the One Vehicle that is neither vertical nor horizontal.

This section has now completed the wondrousness of self-practice from cause to fruit. The “half wish-fulfilling jewel” does not mean that half of a damaged truth has been obtained. It means that the work has completed the half concerning the cause and fruit of self-practice, while the other aspect still awaits development later in the text.

Through the Eye of the Shiqian

In the Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian, Zhanran first illuminates the seven gates as a directed sequence. The general explanation is the one wondrous without differentiation. Because the capacities of sentient beings are not pure, the specific opens from the general. Once the teaching gates differ, coarse and wondrous must be judged; the purpose of judgment lies in opening. Only after opening reveals pure wondrousness can beginning and end be explained. Because the wondrous tracks universally encompass, the corresponding sets are then integrated; finally the siddhāntas comprehensively resolve the preceding meanings. Seen in this light, the seven gates are not seven essays accidentally placed together. Each step answers the question left by the one before it.

The mirror also marks the layers of transmission with particular care. The three reasons for repeating the subject belong to Zhiyi’s main teaching. What follows “I privately say” is an appended statement by Zhang’an Guanding, added when the record was revised and finalized, since only then could it refer back to text already present in the record. This distinction does not weaken the appended statement’s value. It clarifies its work: the lecture first explains repetition through beginning and end, cause and fruit, and self and others; the recorder then uses “one statement is three statements” to explain how each of the three statements opens skillful means while all emerge from the perfect.

In distinguishing the Four Teachings, the mirror separates the vehicle-body of each passage strictly. The Tripiṭaka and Distinct Teachings take wisdom as body, while the Shared and Perfect Teachings take true nature as body. The Perfect Teaching first briefly explains the three dharmas, then the three obstructions, and then gathers them as the three virtues by revealing the tracks through breaking the obstructions. This sequence prevents the Perfect Teaching’s correspondences from being projected backward onto the preceding three teachings, and prevents the three obstructions, revealed tracks, and three virtues from being compressed into an abstract statement that “affliction itself is bodhi.”

For the long passage on the Distinct Teaching, Zhanran judges that it first correctly explains the three tracks, next cites another account in order to distinguish what is wrong, and finally concludes by showing the meaning. What the treatise master criticizes is the deluded claim that ālaya-consciousness produces all Dharmas before attachment has been removed. He does not dismiss every related scripture and treatise without distinction. Zhanran further judges that forming views even on the basis of reality still damages the life of wisdom. When he reaches the Perfect Teaching, he illuminates transport that is nontransport through “true nature remains unmoving from beginning to end and serves as the cart’s body”: self-practice arrives, transforming others continues to move, and the cart’s body and equipment cannot replace one another.

The mirror further distinguishes the cart’s body from its equipment. The cart’s body is explained in terms of inherent principle; the many jewels and white ox in terms of cultivated virtue. The two are immediately identical, yet completeness of adornment cannot be allowed to obscure the cart’s body, nor can guarding the cart’s body justify omitting what enables it to transport. The moon simile for the three bodies works in the same way: the moon in the sky represents the recompense-body for one’s own enjoyment, while the moon in water appears according to the many bodies of water and represents the response-body. The many reflections do not split the original moon.

The mirror also keeps judgment and opening at their distinct tasks. Judging coarse and wondrous proceeds first through the Four Teachings and then through the five flavors. Opening the coarse to reveal the wondrous uses the three statements on buddha-nature to illuminate the objects opened. “Their house” is explained as the five aggregates: neither old nor young in the house knows its treasure. Opening therefore does not create a new buddha-nature, but makes the originally present treasury of awakening that was formerly covered become manifest now. The gate on beginning and end first treats the ten suchnesses of one realm generally, then gathers them within the ten realms in an ordinary person’s single thought. If the three dharmas were wholly absent at the ordinary stage, there would be nothing to open; beginning and end therefore cannot be counted only from midway through cultivation.

The ten sets of three dharmas are gathered in the mirror as one chain from beginning to end. They begin with the deepest delusion of sentient beings being transformed and end when the transforming one’s conditions for transformation are exhausted and entry into extinction occurs. Each set can further pass through the six levels of principle, designation, contemplative practice, resemblance, partial realization, and the ultimate. This prevents two misreadings: reducing the ten sets to a chart of corresponding terms, and inventing item-by-item numerical correspondences not stated in the treatise merely for the sake of neatness. Although the names are many, the text reveals only the cause and fruit of the same vehicle.

In resolving through the siddhāntas, Zhanran notes that the main text explains in detail only the first set, the three tracks, and the last, the three virtues; the intervening eight are understood by analogy. Opening the coarse still follows judgment of the coarse. If the first three siddhāntas are permanently judged destructible, one has still not seen the text’s teaching that each siddhānta can possess ultimate meaning. Here all four siddhāntas must be read from the inconceivable, so that gates responding to capacities are not sealed into fixed ranks.

The mirror also fixes the meaning of the final “half wish-fulfilling jewel.” The ten dharmas together accomplish the Dharma of the wish-fulfilling jewel, and the subtlety of the three dharmas occupies the fifth place among the first ten subtleties. The cause and fruit of self-practice have now been completed, but the aspect of transforming others has not yet unfolded, and so it is called half a jewel. “Half” does not mean that the truth taught is deficient. It is a marker in the course of the entire Fahua Xuanyi: one half has been completely gathered, and the next half will turn from self-practice toward transforming others.

考據Apparatus

三法妙是釋名章第五妙。智者以三法即三軌,先總明唯一大乘,次歷四教分說,再經判麁妙、開麁顯妙、明始終、類通十種三法,最後以四悉檀料簡。全篇既把前四妙收入三軌,又以『半如意珠』標誌自行因果五妙至此完成。

一、科判定位

本單元起於「○第五、三法妙者,斯乃妙位所住之法也。」〔T1716 0741b07〕,止於「此五番明妙,從因至果,以辨自行妙,半如意珠竟。」〔T1716 0746c04–c06〕;下一相『第六明感應妙』已在 0746c12。對應《法華玄義釋籤》自「○五三法妙中二:初來意釋名,次正釋。」〔T1717 0896a01〕起,至「闕化他邊名為半珠。」〔T1717 0900b28–b29〕止;下一相起於 0900c01。

正文自列七門:總明三軌、歷別明三軌、判麁妙、開麁顯妙、明始終、類通三法、悉檀料簡。《法華玄義釋籤》說明其生起:總門先顯唯一妙,因機宜而開別;教門既異,便須判麁妙,而判的用意在開;開後純妙,遂明始終,再以類通顯三軌遍攝,終由悉檀料簡。

總明三軌中,智者正說止於『宜應重說』;其後「私謂一句即三句,三句即一句,名圓佛乘。」〔T1716 0741c09〕一段,《法華玄義釋籤》以「私謂」〔T1717 0896a14〕為章安釋的起點,並說是再治定時所加。故全篇雖是智者說、灌頂記,這一小段仍須另標記者附語。

七門內部又可分三個重心:前四門辨三軌如何由總而別、由麁而妙;第五門由凡地一念說到三德究竟;第六門以十種三法橫通;第七門回答名稱雖異而何以同歸三軌。篇末『半珠』不是三法未圓,而是十妙說至第五,前半自行因果已滿,後半化他諸妙尚待展開。

二、成立與傳本

本論卷前緣起自誌灌頂「次在江陵,奉蒙玄義」〔T1716 0681a16〕,《國清百錄》又記「至荊答地恩。造玉泉寺。章安奉蒙玄義。」〔T1934 0823b28〕,並由灌頂明說「聿遵聖典,書而傳之,《玄》、《文》各十卷。」〔T1716 0681a22–a23〕;故本單元依智者於玉泉講說、灌頂受聞筆錄的層次讀,而不把全篇混作灌頂自撰。

三法妙大段依半卷題署作智者講說、灌頂記錄;唯 0741c09–c17 的『私謂』段,由《法華玄義釋籤》明判為章安再治定時附入。現存大正本以 T1716 為底,《法華玄義釋籤》T1717 是逐文正釋,後出古注則另作接受史見證,各層不可互相改字。

三、所引經論覆核

本單元引經論極密。下表先定今本題名,再把本論所書、今本相應文字與兩者關係全數並列;同文、節引、合引、撮述與所指待考各守其類,不把今本字形倒改入本論。

典籍題名與所屬藏號

本論慣稱今本題名藏號本單元用途
今經、《法華》、下文《妙法蓮華經》T262三軌、大車、十種三法及化城寶所等主要經證
《大經》、《涅槃》《大般涅槃經》T374佛性三句、三德、三涅槃及塗乳譬
《勝鬘》《勝鬘師子吼一乘大方便方廣經》T353有漏、無漏業場景
《大品》《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T223不動、不出之乘與茶字門
《攝大乘》《攝大乘論》T1593金藏土三分場景
《淨名》《維摩詰所說經》T475涅槃相、無明即明、如來種、不二不異
《新金光明》《合部金光明經》T664法身、應身、化身次第
四卷《金光明》《金光明經》T663法身如虛空、應物如水月
《普賢觀》《佛說觀普賢菩薩行法經》T277三種佛身
《思益》《思益梵天所問經》T586一體三寶
《論》所涉常不輕、佛性水《妙法蓮華經憂波提舍》T1519常不輕與佛性水兩場景
《大論》《大智度論》T1509發趣與四悉檀
未署名『一切無礙人』句《大方廣佛華嚴經》T278逐字旁證;本論未題經名

《攝大乘》理乘、隨乘、得乘三名,雖與真如、無分別智、熏習及金藏土論域相接,現存相應諸本、釋中未見三名連文;《法界性論》亦未能確定現存單一所屬藏號;《釋論》所稱『《法華》為祕藏』在《大智度論》今本未見同句。三項皆明記所指待考,不以後出轉引或近義文強繫。

總明、歷別、四教、判開

《玄義》所書今本對讀關係
1「十方諦求,更無餘乘,唯一佛乘」〔T1716 0741b13–b14〕《妙法蓮華經》作「十方諦求,更無餘乘,除佛方便。」〔T262 0015a14〕;另有「唯此一事實,餘二則非真」〔T262 0008a21〕本論把『唯一佛乘』合入,今本相應偈作『除佛方便』。
2「佛性者,亦一、非一、非一非非一。」〔T1716 0741b17–b18〕,並以一切眾生悉一乘、如是數法、數非數法不決定分釋三句《大般涅槃經》作「佛性者,亦色非色、非色非非色,亦相非相、非相非非相,亦一非一、非一非非一」〔T374 0526a02–a04〕,又作「云何為一?一切眾生悉一乘故。云何非一?說三乘故。云何非一非非一?無數法故。」〔T374 0526a11–a13〕本論節取九章中第三章;『如是數法』與『說三乘故』、『數、非數法不決定』與『無數法故』各異。
2a「伊字、天目」〔T1716 0741b17〕《大般涅槃經》作「猶如伊字三點,若並則不成伊,縱亦不成;如摩醯首羅面上三目,乃得成伊三點,若別亦不得成。」〔T374 0376c11–c13〕本論縮成兩個譬名,以顯三法不並不別。
3「於一佛乘,分別說三。」〔T1716 0741c17〕,後又再引〔T1716 0742a05–a06〕《妙法蓮華經》作「於一佛乘分別說三。」〔T262 0007b26〕字面相合;本論加逗號。
4「聲聞僧者,名有為僧。」〔T1716 0741c25〕《大般涅槃經》作「僧亦有二種:有為、無為。有為僧者名曰聲聞」〔T374 0391b14–b15〕本論倒轉名句而撮述。
5「六波羅蜜福德莊嚴。」〔T1716 0741c26〕《大般涅槃經》作「福德莊嚴者,謂檀波羅蜜乃至般若非般若波羅蜜。」〔T374 0523a17–a18〕本論以六波羅蜜總名,今本無同一整句。
6「聲聞之人,定力多故,不見佛性。」〔T1716 0741c26–c27〕《大般涅槃經》同一論域作「不得第一義空故,不行中道,無中道故,不見佛性。」〔T374 0523b22–b23〕未在今本鎖得『定力多故』整句;只並錄相應論域。
7本論說《勝鬘》稱有漏〔T1716 0741c28〕《勝鬘師子吼一乘大方便方廣經》作「如取,緣有漏業因而生三有。」〔T353 0220a16–a17〕,續說無明住地緣無漏業而生三種意生身有漏、無漏業場景相扣,本論是類義引用。
8「無為無漏,名菩薩僧。」〔T1716 0742a28〕,又說一地至十地智慧名智慧莊嚴《大般涅槃經》作「慧莊嚴者,謂從一地乃至十地,是名慧莊嚴。」〔T374 0523a16–a17〕,又作「慧莊嚴者,無為、無漏、無無、無果報、無礙、常住。」〔T374 0523a22–a23〕本論合兩處並增『菩薩僧』,今本無同一整句。
8a三藏、通教兩段都說有索車之意〔T1716 0742a16;0742a23〕《妙法蓮華經》火宅偈作「願賜我等,三種寶車。」〔T262 0014c04–c05〕本論以『索車』撮取角色、請求與寶車場景。
9「《攝大乘》明三種乘:理乘、隨乘、得乘。」〔T1716 0742b01–b02〕《攝大乘論》金藏土段不含三名;相應諸譯亦未鎖得連文所指待考,不把後出定義冒充今本原句。
10本論說龍樹先以不可得空洗蕩封著,後點空說法、結四句相〔T1716 0742b14–b19〕《大智度論》全書有空遣與分別法門,本段卻未署可獨占的單一引句屬智者對龍樹造論意的撮述,不造逐字來源。
10a「多含兒蘇,恐將夭命」〔T1716 0742b26〕《大般涅槃經》問乳母「汝以愛念多唅兒酥,不知籌量消與不消?」〔T374 0385b27–b28〕,乳母答「我於今朝多與兒蘇,恐不能消,將無夭壽?」〔T374 0385c01–c02〕角色、食物、過量與夭壽之懼相合;含、唅及夭命、夭壽有別。
10b「眾生即涅槃相,不可復滅;涅槃即生死,無滅不生。」〔T1716 0742c01–c02〕《維摩詰所說經》作「諸佛知一切眾生畢竟寂滅,即涅槃相,不復更滅。」〔T475 0542b18–b19〕本論節縮前半,並續作『涅槃即生死』。
11「是乘不動、不出。」〔T1716 0742c03〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》作「是乘亦如是,非住非不住。」〔T223 0260b28–b29〕,又作「是乘無所住。以不住法、不動法故。」〔T223 0260c03〕,後續問誰乘此乘而出不動與不出場景皆在,本論壓成一短句。
12「其車高廣,眾寶莊校。」〔T1716 0742c18〕《妙法蓮華經》作「其車高廣,眾寶莊校,周匝欄楯,四面懸鈴」〔T262 0012c18–c19〕字面相合,本論節引。
12a「又多僕從而侍衛之。」〔T1716 0743b02〕,又說「有大白牛,肥壯多力,行步平正,其疾如風」〔T1716 0743b03–b04〕長行作「駕以白牛,膚色充潔,形體姝好,有大筋力,行步平正,其疾如風;又多僕從而侍衛之。」〔T262 0012c22–c24〕;重頌作「有大白牛,肥壯多力,形體姝好,以駕寶車。多諸儐從,而侍衛之。」〔T262 0014c14–c16〕本論把長行與重頌的白牛、僕從語組合為三軌車譬,各句不可只繫一處。
12b「過茶無字可說」〔T1716 0742c19〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》作「法邊竟處故不終不生,過荼無字可說。」〔T223 0256b11〕茶、荼異;本論節取字門邊竟場景。
13「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」〔T1716 0742c21–c23〕《妙法蓮華經》同句〔T262 0008a23–a24〕同文。
14「轉、不轉,皆阿鞞跋致」〔T1716 0742c29–0743a01〕《大智度論》作「云何菩薩轉見?」〔T1509 0416c05〕、「於聲聞、辟支佛地見轉故。」〔T1509 0416c06〕今本場景由《法華玄義釋籤》指明;『皆阿鞞跋致』是本論依理收束。
14a「嗚呼自責,欲問世尊,為失、為不失?」〔T1716 0743a07〕《妙法蓮華經》先作「嗚呼深自責,云何而自欺?」〔T262 0010c23〕,後作「欲以問世尊,為失為不失?」〔T262 0011a05〕本論合兩處偈句並省文。
15本論以半字漸引說三藏〔T1716 0743a08〕《大般涅槃經》先說「譬如長者,唯有一子」〔T374 0390c15–c16〕,再說「教其半字,而不教誨毘伽羅論」〔T374 0390c18〕本論撮取典故,未作逐字引句。
16「是乘微妙,清淨第一。」〔T1716 0743b10–b11〕《妙法蓮華經》作「是乘微妙、清淨第一,於諸世間,為無有上」〔T262 0015a07–a08〕本論節引,標點各異。
16a本論說今經「正直捨方便」〔T1716 0743b16–b17〕《妙法蓮華經》作「正直捨方便,但說無上道。」〔T262 0010a19〕本論節取上句,接自己的判語。
17開麁三度引佛性一、非一、非一非非一〔T1716 0743b18;b24;c03〕《大般涅槃經》三句連見:「云何為一?一切眾生悉一乘故。云何非一?說三乘故。云何非一非非一?無數法故。」〔T374 0526a11–a13〕本論依次開人天、別、藏通,排列是本論自身的解釋次第。
18「而其家大小都無知者」〔T1716 0743b20–b21〕《大般涅槃經》作「如貧女人舍內,多有真金之藏,家人大小無有知者。」〔T374 0407b12–b13〕本論節引。
18a「一切無礙人,一道出生死。」〔T1716 0743b22〕《大方廣佛華嚴經》作「一切無礙人,一道出生死,」〔T278 0429b19〕逐字相合而句末標點不同;本論未題經名,只列為逐字旁證。

始終:三道即三軌

《玄義》所書今本對讀關係
19「無明轉,即變為明。」〔T1716 0743c23〕《大般涅槃經》作「若無明轉,則變為明」〔T374 0411a23〕本論省若、則並改句讀。
20「無明即是明。」〔T1716 0743c23–c24〕《維摩詰所說經》作「無明實性即是明,明亦不可取」〔T475 0551a16〕本論節引並省『實性』。
21「煩惱之儔,為如來種。」〔T1716 0744a08–a09〕《維摩詰所說經》先作「一切煩惱為如來種。」〔T475 0549b13〕,後作「塵勞之疇為如來種」〔T475 0549b17〕本論合『煩惱』與『之疇』兩形,儔、疇亦異。

類通十條之一:三道、三識、三佛性、三般若

《玄義》所書今本對讀關係
22「世間相常住」〔T1716 0744b01–b02〕《妙法蓮華經》作「是法住法位,世間相常住」〔T262 0009b10〕本論節引。
23「諸法從本來,常自寂滅相。」〔T1716 0744b04〕《妙法蓮華經》同句〔T262 0008b25〕同文。
24「於諸過去佛,若有聞一句,皆已成佛道。」〔T1716 0744b05–b06〕《妙法蓮華經》作「於諸過去佛,在世或滅度,若有聞是法,皆已成佛道。」〔T262 0009a26–a27〕本論省中句,『一句』與『是法』異。
25「深達罪福相,遍照於十方。」〔T1716 0744b06–b07〕《妙法蓮華經》作「深達罪福相,遍照於十方,」〔T262 0035b28〕句末標點不同。
26「惡鬼入其心,罵詈毀辱我,我等念佛故,皆當忍是事。」〔T1716 0744b09–b10〕《妙法蓮華經》作「惡鬼入其身,罵詈毀辱我。我等敬信佛,當著忍辱鎧」〔T262 0036c15–c16〕,前文另有「皆當忍受之」〔T262 0036c13〕心、身;念佛、敬信佛及句序都不同。
27本論撮述威音王佛時四眾罵詈、打拍,不輕教化而皆得不退〔T1716 0744b11–b13〕《妙法蓮華經》具四眾罵詈、杖木瓦石及後來信伏的連續場景〔T262 0050c22–0051a11〕場景相合,本論未作整段逐字引用。
28本論說提婆達多是善知識〔T1716 0744b13–b14〕《妙法蓮華經》作「由提婆達多善知識故,令我具足六波羅蜜」〔T262 0034c26–c27〕本論撮義。
29《攝論》一段作「如金、土、染、淨。染譬六識;金譬淨識;土譬黎耶識。」〔T1716 0744c02–c03〕《攝大乘論》作「於依他性中,分別性為染污分,真實性為清淨分,依他性為染污清淨分。」〔T1593 0121a06–a08〕,又作「以金藏土為譬。譬如於金藏土中,見有三法:一地界、二金、三土。」〔T1593 0121a08–a09〕金藏土三分場景相合;六識、淨識、黎耶三配是本論改配。
30本論以親友家醉臥、遊行求衣食、示衣珠譬三識〔T1716 0744c04–c08〕《妙法蓮華經》具醉臥、遊行求衣食、親友示衣珠場景〔T262 0029a06–a16〕根經不說三識,三識配譬是本論類通。
31「汝實我子;我實汝父。」〔T1716 0744c14〕《妙法蓮華經》作「此實我子,我實其父。」〔T262 0017b13〕汝、此及汝父、其父不同。
32「我昔教汝無上道故,一切智願猶在不失。」〔T1716 0744c14–c15〕《妙法蓮華經》先作「教化我等,令發一切智心」〔T262 0029a16–a17〕,後作「一切智願,猶在不失。」〔T262 0029a18–a19〕本論合場景並增『我昔教汝無上道故』。
33「我不敢輕於汝等,汝等皆當作佛。」〔T1716 0744c16–c17〕《妙法蓮華經》同句〔T262 0050c22–c23〕同文。
34「是時四眾,以讀誦眾經」〔T1716 0744c17–c18〕《妙法蓮華經》有「時諸四眾,計著於法。」〔T262 0051b14〕,又說不輕「復為諸人,廣說是經」〔T262 0051b20〕今本無本論整句,場景由本論撮合。
35「修諸功德」〔T1716 0744c18〕《妙法蓮華經》作「漸具功德,疾成佛道。」〔T262 0051b23–b24〕近義而非同文。
36「長者諸子,若十、二十,乃至三十。」〔T1716 0744c19〕《妙法蓮華經》作「長者諸子,若十、二十,或至三十」〔T262 0012b18〕乃至、或至不同。
37「種種性相義,我已悉知見。」〔T1716 0744c20〕《妙法蓮華經》作「我已悉知見。如是大果報,種種性相義,我及十方佛,乃能知是事。」〔T262 0005c22–c24〕本論倒序合引並省『如是大果報』。
38「止止不須說,我法妙難思。」〔T1716 0744c27〕《妙法蓮華經》同句〔T262 0006c19〕同文。
39「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅。」〔T1716 0744c28〕《妙法蓮華經》作「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅,」〔T262 0005c25〕句末標點不同。
40「我及十方佛,乃能知是相。」〔T1716 0744c29〕《妙法蓮華經》作「我及十方佛,乃能知是事。」〔T262 0005c24〕相、事不同。
41「唯佛與佛,乃能究盡。」〔T1716 0744c29–0745a01〕《妙法蓮華經》作「唯佛與佛乃能究盡諸法實相」〔T262 0005c10–c11〕本論節引。
42「我所得智慧,微妙最第一。」〔T1716 0745a01〕《妙法蓮華經》同句〔T262 0009c06〕同文。
43「我常知眾生,行道不行道,隨應所可度,為說種種法。」〔T1716 0745a02–a03〕《妙法蓮華經》作「我常知眾生,行道不行道,隨所應可度,為說種種法。」〔T262 0044a01–a02〕隨應、隨所應不同。
44「如來知見廣大深遠。」〔T1716 0745a04〕《妙法蓮華經》作「如來知見,廣大深遠」〔T262 0005c04〕,前文另有「如來方便知見波羅蜜皆已具足。」〔T262 0005c03〕標點不同;本論把方便、知見具足配文字般若。

類通十條之二:三菩提、三大乘、三身

《玄義》所書今本對讀關係
45「我先不言汝等皆得阿耨三菩提。」〔T1716 0745a13–a14〕《妙法蓮華經》作「我先不言:『諸佛世尊以種種因緣、譬喻言辭方便說法,皆為阿耨多羅三藐三菩提耶?』」〔T262 0012b09–b11〕本論大幅壓縮並增『汝等皆得』。今本內層引號照其本。
46「非實、非虛、非如、非異,不如三界,見於三界。」〔T1716 0745a14–a15〕《妙法蓮華經》作「非實非虛,非如非異,不如三界見於三界」〔T262 0042c14–c15〕字面相合,本論增頓號。
47「我成道已來,甚大久遠。」〔T1716 0745a15〕《妙法蓮華經》作「我成佛已來,甚大久遠」〔T262 0042c19–c20〕成道、成佛不同。
48「我說少出家,近伽耶城,得三菩提。」〔T1716 0745a16–a17〕《妙法蓮華經》一處作「我少出家,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」〔T262 0042c07〕,另一處作「去伽耶城不遠」〔T262 0042b10〕本論合引兩處並撮述。
49「若我遇眾生,盡教以佛道。」〔T1716 0745a17–a18〕《妙法蓮華經》作「若我遇眾生,盡教以佛道,」〔T262 0008b08〕句末標點不同。
50「安住實智中,我定當作佛。」〔T1716 0745a18–a19〕《妙法蓮華經》作「安住實智中。我定當作佛,」〔T262 0011b06–b07〕中間與句末標點不同。
51「佛子行道已,來世得作佛。」〔T1716 0745a19–a20〕《妙法蓮華經》作「佛子行道已,來世得作佛,」〔T262 0008b26〕句末標點不同。
52「乘是寶乘,直至道場。」〔T1716 0745a20〕《妙法蓮華經》作「乘此寶乘,直至道場。」〔T262 0015a13〕是、此不同。
53「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴。」〔T1716 0745a26–a27〕《妙法蓮華經》作「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」〔T262 0008a23–a24〕本論節引。
54「於道場知已」〔T1716 0745a29〕與「導師方便說」〔T1716 0745a29〕《妙法蓮華經》作「於道場知已,導師方便說。」〔T262 0009b11〕今本連為一句,本論拆配隨乘與得乘。
55「舍利弗!以本願故,說三乘法。」〔T1716 0745b01〕《妙法蓮華經》作「舍利弗!彼佛出時,雖非惡世,以本願故,說三乘法。」〔T262 0011b24–b25〕本論省中段。
56「是乘微妙清淨第一」〔T1716 0745b02〕《妙法蓮華經》作「是乘微妙、清淨第一」〔T262 0015a07〕標點不同。
57「於一佛乘」〔T1716 0745b02〕與「分別說三」〔T1716 0745b03〕《妙法蓮華經》作「於一佛乘分別說三。」〔T262 0007b26〕本論拆配理乘與得、隨二乘。
58《新金光明》一引作「依於法身,得有報身;依於報身,得有應身。」〔T1716 0745b07–b08〕《合部金光明經》作「依於法身故出應身,依於應身故出化身。」〔T664 0364c09–c10〕報、應對今本應、化;『得有』與『故出』亦異。
59「佛真法身,猶如虛空,應物現形,如水中月。」〔T1716 0745b10–b11〕《金光明經》同句〔T663 0344b03–b04〕同文。
60「佛自住大乘」〔T1716 0745b11〕與「定慧力莊嚴」〔T1716 0745b12〕《妙法蓮華經》連見於 0008a23–a24本論以虛空、天月、水月重新配法、報、應三身。
61「唯佛與佛,乃能究盡諸法實相。」〔T1716 0745b13–b14〕《妙法蓮華經》同句〔T262 0005c10–c11〕同文。
62「我所得智慧,微妙最第一。」〔T1716 0745b14–b15〕與「名稱普聞」〔T1716 0745b15〕《妙法蓮華經》前句在 0009c06,後者作「名稱普聞無量世界」〔T262 0002a07〕分屬兩處,本論各配報身、應身。
62a本論說非生、現生等是應身〔T1716 0745b15〕《妙法蓮華經》說「隨所應度,處處自說,名字不同、年紀大小,亦復現言當入涅槃」〔T262 0042c03–c04〕,又說「如來如實知見三界之相,無有生死、若退若出,亦無在世及滅度者」〔T262 0042c13–c14〕示生滅與實無生滅場景相扣,今本無本論短句連文。
63「我以相嚴身,光明照十方,為說實相印。」〔T1716 0745b17–b18〕《妙法蓮華經》作「我以相嚴身,光明照世間,無量眾所尊,為說實相印。」〔T262 0008b02–b03〕十方、世間不同;本論省『無量眾所尊』。
64「深達罪福相,遍照於十方。」〔T1716 0745b19–b20〕、「微妙淨法身」〔T1716 0745b20〕、「具相三十二」〔T1716 0745b20〕《妙法蓮華經》連作「深達罪福相,遍照於十方,微妙淨法身,具相三十二」〔T262 0035b28–b29〕本論拆成三引,分配報、法、應三身。
65「佛三種身,從方等生。」〔T1716 0745b21–b22〕《佛說觀普賢菩薩行法經》作「佛三種身從方等生」〔T277 0393a10〕同文而標點不同。
66《法界性論》一引作「水銀和真金,能塗諸色像,功德和法身,處處應現往。」〔T1716 0745b22–b23〕現存相應藏本未鎖得《法界性論》的單一所屬經號,後出天台文獻只保存轉引所指待考,不以後出轉引假立今本。

類通十條之三:三涅槃、一體三寶、三德

《玄義》所書今本對讀關係
67地人說「但有性淨、方便淨。」〔T1716 0745b25–b26〕本論未署題;《法華玄義釋籤》判此處先破古、後正釋〔T1717 0899b23–b25〕這是學派說法,不立單一所屬經號;本論隨後另立性淨、圓淨、方便淨。
68「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅。」〔T1716 0745c02–c03〕,又引「諸法從本來,常自寂滅相。」〔T1716 0745c03–c04〕《妙法蓮華經》分見 0005c25、0008b25兩處引文,不是一偈連文。
69「皆以如來滅度而滅度之」〔T1716 0745c04–c05〕《妙法蓮華經》同句〔T262 0013c07〕同文。
70「我成佛已來,甚大久遠。」〔T1716 0745c05–c06〕《妙法蓮華經》同句〔T262 0042c19–c20〕同文。
70a「數數唱生,處處現滅,於此夜滅度,如薪盡火滅」〔T1716 0745c07〕《妙法蓮華經》有「佛此夜滅度,如薪盡火滅,」〔T262 0005a21〕;〈壽量品〉另有處處自說、現言入滅的場景〔T262 0042c03–c04〕『此夜滅度、薪盡火滅』可逐字定位;『數數唱生、處處現滅』是本論撮述。
71本論以《大經》題『大般涅槃』分釋大、滅、度〔T1716 0745c08–c11〕今本題名《大般涅槃經》T374大配性淨,度配圓淨,滅配方便淨,是智者釋題。
72《思益》一引作「知覺名為佛;知離名為法;知無名為僧。」〔T1716 0745c15–c16〕《思益梵天所問經》作「知法名為佛,知離名為法,知無名為僧」〔T586 0037c13–c14〕知覺、知法不同;後二句相合。
73一體三寶先取「佛自住大乘」〔T1716 0745c17〕與「如其所得法,以此度眾生。」〔T1716 0745c17〕,再取「世間相常住」〔T1716 0745c19〕、「於道場知已」〔T1716 0745c19〕、「導師方便說」〔T1716 0745c20〕《妙法蓮華經》相應兩組分見 0008a23–a24、0009b10–b11本論依佛、法、僧重新配屬,經中不另標三寶。
74「佛性者亦一」〔T1716 0745c25〕《大般涅槃經》有「亦一非一、非一非非一」〔T374 0526a03–a04〕,又說「一切眾生悉一乘故。」〔T374 0526a11–a12〕本論節引。
75「我所得智慧,微妙最第一」〔T1716 0745c27〕,乃至「決了聲聞法,是諸經之王」〔T1716 0745c28〕《妙法蓮華經》前句在 0009c06;後兩句作「決了聲聞法。是諸經之王」〔T262 0032a15〕分屬兩品,本論以『乃至』統攝般若德。
75a「智慧門難解難入」〔T1716 0745c27〕《妙法蓮華經》作「佛智慧甚深無量,其智慧門難解難入」〔T262 0005b26〕本論節取智慧門一句。
76「八千聲聞於法華中,得受記莂,如秋收冬藏,見如來性,更無所作。」〔T1716 0746a08–a09〕《大般涅槃經》先說「能令眾生見於佛性」〔T374 0420a23〕,後作「八千聲聞,得受記莂成大果實,如秋收冬藏,更無所作。」〔T374 0420a24–a25〕本論把見性語併入聲聞句,省『成大果實』。
77「種種性相義,而我皆已見。」〔T1716 0746a11〕《妙法蓮華經》作「我已悉知見。如是大果報,種種性相義」〔T262 0005c22–c23〕倒序,悉、皆不同。
78「世間相常住。於道場知已,導師方便說。」〔T1716 0746a12–a13〕《妙法蓮華經》作「世間相常住,於道場知已,導師方便說。」〔T262 0009b10–b11〕本論把第一個逗號改作句號。
79《論》一段作「佛性水常不輕。」〔T1716 0746a14〕,並說常不輕知眾生有佛性《妙法蓮華經憂波提舍》一處以常不輕「示現眾生皆有佛性故」〔T1519 0009a14〕,另一處說「受持此經得佛性水成阿耨多羅三藐三菩提故」〔T1519 0010a26–a27〕本論把佛性水與常不輕兩場景連寫,今本無同一短句。
80「安置諸子祕密藏中,我亦不久當入其中」〔T1716 0746a15–a16〕《大般涅槃經》作「一切眾生,及以我子四部之眾,悉皆安住祕密藏中,我亦復當安住是中」〔T374 0376c09–c11〕本論節縮;不久、復及入、安住不同。
81「佛自住大乘,以此度眾生。終不以小乘濟度諸眾生,悉以如來滅度而滅度之。」〔T1716 0746a17–a18〕《妙法蓮華經》一處作「終不以小乘,濟度於眾生。佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」〔T262 0008a22–a24〕,另一處作「皆以如來滅度而滅度之。」〔T262 0013c07〕本論合引兩處並重排,悉、皆亦異。
82《釋論》一引作「《法華》為祕藏,兩經文義宛宛恒同。」〔T1716 0746a20–a21〕《大智度論》今本未見此句;《妙法蓮華經》僧叡後序有「《法華經》者,諸佛之祕藏,眾經之實體也。」〔T262 0062b07〕所指待考;後序只是近義旁證,作者與文類都不同。

悉檀料簡

《玄義》所書今本對讀關係
82a「苦塗水洗,養嬰兒以適時。」〔T1716 0746b02〕《大般涅槃經》先說「以苦物用塗其乳」〔T374 0407c03〕,藥消後又說「遂至藥消,母人以水淨洗其乳,喚其子言:『來與汝乳。』」〔T374 0407c05–c07〕母、嬰兒、苦塗、水洗與先拒後喚的場景相合。
83《論》一段作「三悉檀是世諦,心所行處,可破可壞。第一義悉檀,是心不行處,諸佛聖人心所得法,不可破壞,即是真諦。」〔T1716 0746b16–b18〕《大智度論》作「第一義悉檀者,一切法性,一切論議語言,一切是法非法,一一可分別破散;諸佛、辟支佛、阿羅漢所行真實法,不可破,不可散。」〔T1509 0060c07–c10〕,又作「除第一義悉檀,諸餘論議,諸餘悉檀,皆可破故。」〔T1509 0060c12–c13〕及「過一切語言道,心行處滅」〔T1509 0061b07–b08〕本論合三處撮述並加二諦判語,不是今本單段連文。
84本論依世界、為人、對治、第一義四悉檀辨十種三法〔T1716 0746b03–b15〕《大智度論》明列「有四種悉檀:一者、世界悉檀,二者、各各為人悉檀,三者、對治悉檀,四者、第一義悉檀。」〔T1509 0059b18–b20〕四悉名目同見今本;本論另以它們配三軌、三德。
84a本論以化城可壞、寶所不可過滅,判三悉檀與中道第一義〔T1716 0746b23–b26〕《妙法蓮華經》說導師許疲眾入城,若能前進便至寶所〔T262 0026a07–a08〕;眾人止息後「即滅化城」〔T262 0026a11〕,並告知寶處在近、此城只是方便所化〔T262 0026a11–a13〕化城暫止、寶所終向的場景相合。

以上對讀中,最須分清的不是字句多少,而是三種關係:本論直接保留的經句、智者依經義所作的節引合引,以及本論自身的類通配屬。三識、三身、三涅槃等配屬屬《玄義》的論述;根經提供譬喻或句證,卻不因此已自行列出這些三法名稱。

四、釋籤釋要〔鏡〕

《法華玄義釋籤》先以「謂唯一妙無復差別,機宜不純開總出別,即約教也。」〔T1717 0896a04–a05〕定七門之眼:三法本是唯一妙,歷別是因機宜而開,不是本體本有隔裂。判的用意在開,開後再明始終與遍攝,末以悉檀料簡。

總門中,湛然把智者重說三義與章安附語分開;『私謂』是章安再治定時所加,『記中』則指章安所記的大師說。三句開權仍判為皆從圓出,故不可把附語讀成另立一套三乘本源。

歷別先總明開合,再約四教分說。三藏與通教都在證至後失去運義,所以有索車之意;別教段先正明三軌,再引《攝大乘論》辨執,最後勸人善解破立;圓教則依次明三法、三障、體用。湛然總結四教乘體說「藏別兩教咸以智慧為體,通圓兩教咸以真性為體」〔T1717 0897b22–b23〕,正可防止以圓教配屬覆蓋前三教。

判麁妙先約四教,再約五味;開麁顯妙以佛性三句依次開人天、別教、三藏通教。『開』的收束是「還示眾生本有覺藏,使大小咸知,昔覆今顯名之為開。」〔T1717 0898b22–b23〕,所以不是另造一個妙法,而是使本有不再被覆。

明始終先泛約一界十如,再局於一念十界。凡夫若全無三法,便無可開;故智者由三道性相直說三軌性相,再歷修德與究竟。類通十條則被收成「始自所化極迷,終至能化入滅。復一一條中皆約六即」〔T1717 0898c26–c27〕:十條不是十套孤立名表,而是一條從三道輪迴到三德祕藏的始終鏈。

在十條內,湛然特別分清三識是教門權說,三身前二引他經、後五引今經,三涅槃則先破古、後正釋。一體三寶所引《思益梵天所問經》,釋籤保存知離、知無二句;本論『知覺』與今本『知法』仍須各守其本。

悉檀料簡先說異名所以,後以四悉釋十條,只詳初三軌與末三德,中間八條例然。最後,湛然以「十法共成如意珠法」〔T1717 0900b24〕與「十中居半」〔T1717 0900b25〕收束,又說自行因果已滿而尚闕化他邊。『半』因此是全書十妙的次第標誌,不是妙法殘缺。

五、諸家異釋

智銓《法華經玄籤證釋》有自「不並不別,與不縱不橫,名異義同。」〔X0592 0606c04–c05〕至『果即三法玅』的連續注面。其說不並、不別與不橫、不縱名異義同,又區分『如來之藏』總該三法與『如來藏』偏就一軌;這是清代古注的解讀,不取代智者、湛然原文。

智銓把大車分成高廣、白牛、儐從,又據後出疏文釋『禿乘』為有車體而無具度;於類通十條則以「無始流轉,不出三道。流轉由識,識內具性。照性由智,智滿成道。道由乘至,至故身顯。顯必涅槃」〔X0592 0607c22–c24〕排出前八節,續以三寶、三德收束。它又明記今本《思益梵天所問經》作『知法』,可與本論『知覺』並觀。

源清《法華十妙不二門示珠指》說「眾生心因既具三軌,此因成果,名三涅槃。因果無殊,始終理一。」〔X0926 0315a05–a06〕,並把第五妙定位為極果所住三軌、三身、三德。知禮《十不二門指要鈔》則說「一念心因既具三軌,此因成果名三涅槃。」〔T1928 0714a29〕,又以三身三智、三識三道、三菩提三大乘三涅槃分說修性離合。

智圓《涅槃經疏三德指歸》亦直接說「若了三德在一心中,則此經一部居于方寸,況法華開顯十方三世同說三軌」〔X0662 0374b16–b18〕,另說「眾生心因既具三軌,此因成果名三涅槃,因果無殊始終理一」〔X0662 0479a24–0479b01〕。山家、山外材料都直接扣合修性、三軌三德與始終因果;各家說法並列於此,不作勝劣裁定。

六、術語

三法、三軌。 本論自釋三法就是三軌,『軌』有軌範義。三名是真性、觀照、資成;名雖有三,只是一大乘法,不得看成三個可分離實體。

真性、觀照、資成。 真性是不偽、不改之性;觀照是寂而常照;資成是法界含藏無量行具。不同教門對三者的乘體、乘具有不同配屬,圓教才以真性為體、觀照資成為能運之具。

第一義諦、第一義空、如來藏。 一佛乘所具三名。總明中,三名不定為三,也不固定為一;章安私釋再以《大般涅槃經》三句開出三類方便。

性德、修德。 性德三軌是本,修德三軌是末;由性德起名字、觀行、相似、分證而至究竟。始終所明不是先無後有,而是冥伏與彰顯皆不縱不橫。

乘體、乘具。 所乘之體不可暫廢,能運之觀照、資成如車之莊校與白牛。四教選取乘體不同,須逐段理解。

三障、三德。 塵沙障資成,見思障觀照,根本無明障真性;三軌顯時依次名解脫、般若、法身。法身是所嚴,定慧是能嚴,合成大乘。

教乘、行乘、證乘。 這三名指所聞之教、所修之行、所得之證,不是聲聞、緣覺、菩薩三乘。

開麁顯妙。 由佛性三句決了諸方便,使本有覺藏由昔覆而今顯。開不是刪除先前法門,而是不再把方便隔在妙外。

豎通、橫通。 三軌從性德至究竟,是豎通;以三軌會通十種三法,是橫通。這裏的橫豎是攝法方向,不等於前文所破三法縱橫隔別。

十種三法。 三道、三識、三佛性、三般若、三菩提、三大乘、三身、三涅槃、一體三寶、三德。由極迷到入滅,十條合成始終。

半如意珠。 前五妙已辨自行因果,十妙說至一半,故稱半珠。珠仍是完整妙法,『半』只標明論述次第。

後世常用『五時八教』『化儀』『化法』『藏通別圓』『迹門十妙』『本門十妙』『一念三千』作綱目;本論此處實際用語是四教、五味、十妙前半及凡心一念具十法界。這些綱目可供後世導讀,但不是本段逐字自稱。

七、譬喻、互讀與承衍

伊字三點與摩醯首羅三目,顯三法不可並列也不可分別;如意珠的珠、光、寶,又顯三者既不相同也不相離。大車則把真性作車體,如來藏作眾寶與僕從,第一義空作白牛;高、廣、莊校、多力、平正、疾如風,都在一車中互相成就。

別教辨執用兩個警譬:如長冰再添水,舊執未除而新執更厚;如給嬰兒過量食蘇,連真實教語若被執取也會損害慧命。兩譬都針對封著,不把某一經論本身判為全無價值。

開麁顯妙以貧女家中金藏說本有而不知,又以輪王破而能安、日除暗生物、醫師除膜養珠,說慧能破定相與不定相。明始終再用冰水、竹火與迷南為北:明不離無明,善性可由惡緣翻發,法身也不在苦道之外另立。

類通三道以薪生火說煩惱與觀照,以不輕受辱、提婆達多善知識說惡可資成;類通三識借衣珠譬,把醉臥、遊行、得示衣珠依次配入三識。這些配屬出自《玄義》的類通,根經本身並未明列三識。

悉檀料簡以朝三暮四、苦塗水洗、方圓任物、千車同轍,說名稱隨機而異、所得義旨相通。化城與寶所又把可壞方便和不可壞終向分開。全篇由前四妙承入三法妙,至三法妙完成自行果位,隨後才轉感應等化他諸妙;這是它在十妙中的承衍位置。

八、校本定位

一、本單元以大正藏 T1716 為底,起於 0741b07,止於 0746c06;《法華玄義釋籤》對位為 T1717 0896a01–0900b29。頁錨一律取引句首字之前最近同版行號,跨頁長段不以段首總錨代替各引首字。

二、本單元正文範圍有一枚異讀錨,在 0745c17。一體三寶句通行整理本作『佛自住大乘』,大正原讀作『佛自在大乘』;兩形並錄,不判孰正,也不以一形吞併另一形。

三、0741c09–c17 是章安再治定附語;其層界由 T1717 0896a14–a24 確定。其餘正文仍依題署作智者講說、灌頂記錄。

四、《攝大乘論》三乘名、《法界性論》與《釋論》祕藏句皆保持所指待考。『地人言』是學派報告;『般若如金剛』與『動、不動皆是毘尼』在本段也未署單一所屬典籍,均不以後出解說反造原典。

五、三佛性入口『三』字之前最近行號是 0744c11,不能依版面空行臆補 0744c12。長引、合引與重複引句各取自身首字行;同一句在本論多見時,以本單元實際出現為準。

The subtlety of the three dharmas is the fifth subtlety in the chapter on explaining the name. Zhiyi identifies the three dharmas with the three tracks. He first explains the one Great Vehicle in general, then distinguishes it through the Four Teachings, proceeds through judging coarse and wondrous, opening the coarse to reveal the wondrous, explaining beginning and end, and integrating ten sets of three dharmas, and finally resolves questions through the four siddhāntas. The whole unit both gathers the preceding four subtleties into the three tracks and uses 『半如意珠』 tr. “half wish-fulfilling jewel” to mark the completion of the five subtleties concerning the cause and fruit of self-practice.

1. Doctrinal-Outline Placement

This unit begins with 「○第五、三法妙者,斯乃妙位所住之法也。」 tr. “Fifth, as for the subtlety of the three dharmas, these are the Dharmas in which the wondrous stages abide”〔T1716 0741b07〕 and ends with 「此五番明妙,從因至果,以辨自行妙,半如意珠竟。」 tr. “These five treatments clarify the wondrous from cause to fruit in order to discern the wondrousness of self-practice; the half wish-fulfilling jewel is complete”〔T1716 0746c04–c06〕. The next characteristic, 『第六明感應妙』 tr. “sixth, clarifying the subtlety of stimulus and response,” has already begun at 0746c12. The corresponding passage in the Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian begins with 「○五三法妙中二:初來意釋名,次正釋。」 tr. “Fifth, the subtlety of the three dharmas has two parts: first, the reason for its coming and explanation of its name; next, the direct explanation”〔T1717 0896a01〕 and ends with 「闕化他邊名為半珠。」 tr. “Because the aspect of transforming others is still lacking, it is called half a jewel”〔T1717 0900b28–b29〕. The next characteristic begins at 0900c01.

The main text itself lists seven gates: explaining the three tracks in general, explaining the three tracks separately, judging coarse and wondrous, opening the coarse to reveal the wondrous, explaining beginning and end, integrating the three dharmas, and resolving questions through the siddhāntas. The Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian explains how they arise in sequence: the general gate first reveals the one wondrous; because capacities differ, the specific is opened. Once the teaching gates differ, coarse and wondrous must be judged, while the purpose of judgment lies in opening. After opening there is pure wondrousness, so beginning and end can be explained; integration then reveals the universal scope of the three tracks; and the siddhāntas finally resolve the questions.

Within the general explanation of the three tracks, Zhiyi’s direct teaching ends with 『宜應重說』 tr. “they should therefore be explained again.” The passage that follows, 「私謂一句即三句,三句即一句,名圓佛乘。」 tr. “I privately say: one statement is immediately three statements, and three statements are immediately one; this is called the Perfect Buddha-Vehicle”〔T1716 0741c09〕, is identified by the Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian as beginning with Zhang’an’s explanation at 「私謂」 tr. “I privately say”〔T1717 0896a14〕 and as having been added when the record was revised and finalized. Thus, although the whole work is spoken by Zhiyi and recorded by Guanding, this short passage must still be marked separately as an appended statement by the recorder.

The seven gates can further be divided into three centers of gravity. The first four discern how the three tracks move from general to specific and from coarse to wondrous. The fifth proceeds from an ordinary person’s single thought to the ultimate three virtues. The sixth integrates the ten sets of three dharmas horizontally. The seventh answers why different names are used when all return to the three tracks. The final 『半珠』 tr. “half jewel” does not mean that the three dharmas are incomplete; it means that the ten subtleties have reached their fifth member, the first half concerning the cause and fruit of self-practice is complete, and the later subtleties concerning transforming others remain to unfold.

2. Formation and Transmission

The treatise’s prefatory account of its origins records Guanding saying 「次在江陵,奉蒙玄義」 tr. “Next, in Jiangling, I reverently received the Profound Meaning”〔T1716 0681a16〕. The Guoqing Bailu likewise records 「至荊答地恩。造玉泉寺。章安奉蒙玄義。」 tr. “He went to Jingzhou to repay the kindness of the land, built Yuquan Monastery, and Zhang’an reverently received the Profound Meaning”〔T1934 0823b28〕. Guanding further says 「聿遵聖典,書而傳之,《玄》、《文》各十卷。」 tr. “Thereupon, following the sacred canon, I wrote and transmitted it, the Profound Meaning and the Words and Phrases each in ten fascicles”〔T1716 0681a22–a23〕. This unit is therefore read as Zhiyi’s lecture at Yuquan recorded by Guanding, not as a discourse authored throughout by Guanding.

The major section on the subtlety of the three dharmas belongs, according to its half-fascicle title, to Zhiyi’s teaching recorded by Guanding. Only the passage 0741c09–c17 beginning 『私謂』 tr. “I privately say” is explicitly judged by the Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian to have been appended by Zhang’an when he revised and finalized the record. The extant Taishō base is T1716. T1717, the Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian, is the direct line-by-line commentary, while later old commentaries provide distinct witnesses to reception history. The wording of one layer must not replace that of another.

3. Scriptures and Treatises Cited by Zhiyi

This unit cites scriptures and treatises with exceptional density. The table first establishes the titles of the received texts, then records in full the wording written in this treatise, the corresponding wording in the received witnesses, and the relation between them. Verbatim agreement, excerpt, composite citation, synopsis, and unidentified referent each retain their own category; the graph forms of received witnesses are not silently substituted into this treatise.

Titles and Canon Numbers

Treatise designationReceived titleCanon no.Use in this unit
present scripture, Lotus, later passageSutra of the Lotus Blossom of the Wondrous DharmaT262Principal scriptural evidence for the three tracks, great cart, ten sets of three dharmas, conjured city, treasure-place, and related topics
“Great Sutra,” NirvāṇaMahāparinirvāṇa SūtraT374Three statements on buddha-nature, three virtues, three nirvāṇas, and the bitter-smeared-breast simile
ŚrīmālāŚrīmālādevī Siṃhanāda SūtraT353Contexts of contaminated and uncontaminated karma
“Great Prajñā”Mahāprajñāpāramitā SūtraT223The vehicle that neither moves nor emerges and the gate of the graph (“tea”)
MahāyānasaṃgrahaMahāyānasaṃgrahaT1593The context of the threefold simile of gold, mine-earth, and soil
“Vimalakīrti”Vimalakīrti SūtraT475The mark of nirvāṇa, ignorance itself as illumination, the seed of the Tathāgata, and nonduality
“New Golden Light”Combined Golden Light SūtraT664Sequence of Dharma-, response-, and transformation-bodies
four-fascicle Golden LightGolden Light SūtraT663Dharma-body like empty space and responsive appearance like the moon in water
“Samantabhadra Contemplation”Sūtra on the Practice of Contemplating Bodhisattva SamantabhadraT277The Buddha’s three kinds of body
“Viseṣacinti”Viseṣacintibrahma-paripṛcchā SūtraT586Three Jewels in one substance
the “Treatise” passages concerning Never Disparaging and the water of buddha-natureCommentary on the Lotus SutraT1519The two contexts of Never Disparaging and the water of buddha-nature
“Great Treatise”Great Treatise on the Perfection of WisdomT1509Setting forth and the four siddhāntas
unsigned line 『一切無礙人』 tr. “all unobstructed people”Avataṃsaka SūtraT278Verbatim parallel; the treatise does not name the scripture

Although the three names vehicle of principle, accompanying vehicle, and attained vehicle under the title Mahāyānasaṃgraha are connected with the domains of suchness, nondiscriminating wisdom, perfuming, and the simile of gold, mine-earth, and soil, the three names have not been found together in the corresponding extant versions and commentaries. The Treatise on the Nature of the Dharma Realm likewise cannot be assigned securely to a single extant canon number, while the statement attributed to the “Commentary Treatise,” 『《法華》為祕藏』 tr. “the Lotus is the secret treasury,” is not found verbatim in the received Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom. All three are expressly marked as referents requiring further investigation; no later quotation or near parallel is forced into place as their source.

General Explanation, Separate Explanation, Four Teachings, Judgment, and Opening

No.Wording in the XuanyiReceived witnessRelation
1「十方諦求,更無餘乘,唯一佛乘」 tr. “Search carefully throughout the ten directions; there is no other vehicle, only the One Buddha-Vehicle”〔T1716 0741b13–b14〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「十方諦求,更無餘乘,除佛方便。」 tr. “Search carefully throughout the ten directions; there is no other vehicle apart from the Buddha’s skillful means”〔T262 0015a14〕 and separately 「唯此一事實,餘二則非真」 tr. “Only this one matter is real; the other two are not true”〔T262 0008a21〕.The treatise incorporates 『唯一佛乘』 tr. “only the One Buddha-Vehicle,” while the corresponding received verse reads 『除佛方便』 tr. “apart from the Buddha’s skillful means.”
2「佛性者,亦一、非一、非一非非一。」 tr. “Buddha-nature is also one, is not one, and is neither one nor not-one”〔T1716 0741b17–b18〕, followed by explanations in terms of all sentient beings possessing the One Vehicle, enumerated dharmas such as these, and the indeterminacy of enumerated and non-enumerated dharmasThe Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra reads 「佛性者,亦色非色、非色非非色,亦相非相、非相非非相,亦一非一、非一非非一」 tr. “Buddha-nature is also form, not form, and neither form nor not-form; also characteristic, not characteristic, and neither characteristic nor not-characteristic; also one, not one, and neither one nor not-one”〔T374 0526a02–a04〕 and further 「云何為一?一切眾生悉一乘故。云何非一?說三乘故。云何非一非非一?無數法故。」 tr. “Why is it one? Because all sentient beings alike possess the One Vehicle. Why is it not one? Because three vehicles are taught. Why is it neither one nor not-one? Because there are innumerable dharmas”〔T374 0526a11–a13〕.The treatise excerpts the third member of a nine-part series. 『如是數法』 tr. “enumerated dharmas such as these” differs from 『說三乘故』 tr. “because three vehicles are taught,” while 『數、非數法不決定』 tr. “enumerated and non-enumerated dharmas are indeterminate” differs from 『無數法故』 tr. “because there are innumerable dharmas.”
2a「伊字、天目」 tr. “the siddham letter i and the heavenly eyes”〔T1716 0741b17〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra reads 「猶如伊字三點,若並則不成伊,縱亦不成;如摩醯首羅面上三目,乃得成伊三點,若別亦不得成。」 tr. “It is like the three dots of the siddham letter i: if placed in parallel they do not form i, and if placed vertically they likewise do not. It is like the three eyes on Maheśvara’s face: only then do the three dots form i; if separated, they likewise cannot form it”〔T374 0376c11–c13〕.The treatise compresses the passage into two names for similes showing that the three dharmas are neither parallel nor separate.
3「於一佛乘,分別說三。」 tr. “Within the One Buddha-Vehicle, three are distinguished and taught”〔T1716 0741c17〕, cited again at〔T1716 0742a05–a06〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「於一佛乘分別說三。」 tr. “Within the One Buddha-Vehicle, three are distinguished and taught”〔T262 0007b26〕.The wording agrees; the treatise adds a comma.
4「聲聞僧者,名有為僧。」 tr. “The śrāvaka Saṅgha is called a conditioned Saṅgha”〔T1716 0741c25〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra reads 「僧亦有二種:有為、無為。有為僧者名曰聲聞」 tr. “The Saṅgha is also of two kinds, conditioned and unconditioned. What is called the conditioned Saṅgha is the śrāvakas”〔T374 0391b14–b15〕.The treatise reverses the nominal phrasing and gives a synopsis.
5「六波羅蜜福德莊嚴。」 tr. “The six pāramitās are the adornment of merit”〔T1716 0741c26〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra reads 「福德莊嚴者,謂檀波羅蜜乃至般若非般若波羅蜜。」 tr. “The adornment of merit means the pāramitā of giving through the prajñā/non-prajñā pāramitā”〔T374 0523a17–a18〕.The treatise uses the collective name six pāramitās; the received text does not contain the same complete sentence.
6「聲聞之人,定力多故,不見佛性。」 tr. “Śrāvakas, because their power of concentration is great, do not see buddha-nature”〔T1716 0741c26–c27〕In the same doctrinal context the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra reads 「不得第一義空故,不行中道,無中道故,不見佛性。」 tr. “Because they do not attain the emptiness of ultimate meaning, they do not practice the Middle Way; because they lack the Middle Way, they do not see buddha-nature”〔T374 0523b22–b23〕.The complete phrase 『定力多故』 tr. “because their power of concentration is great” has not been located in the received text; only the corresponding doctrinal context is recorded.
7The treatise says that the Śrīmālā calls it contaminated〔T1716 0741c28〕.The Śrīmālādevī Siṃhanāda Sūtra reads 「如取,緣有漏業因而生三有。」 tr. “As with grasping: conditioned by contaminated karma as cause, the three modes of existence arise”〔T353 0220a16–a17〕 and continues by saying that the ground of abiding in ignorance conditions uncontaminated karma and produces three kinds of mind-made body.The contexts of contaminated and uncontaminated karma correspond; the treatise cites the meaning by analogy.
8「無為無漏,名菩薩僧。」 tr. “What is unconditioned and uncontaminated is called the bodhisattva Saṅgha”〔T1716 0742a28〕, followed by the statement that wisdom from the first through tenth ground is called the adornment of wisdomThe Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra reads 「慧莊嚴者,謂從一地乃至十地,是名慧莊嚴。」 tr. “The adornment of wisdom means from the first ground through the tenth ground; this is called the adornment of wisdom”〔T374 0523a16–a17〕 and also 「慧莊嚴者,無為、無漏、無無、無果報、無礙、常住。」 tr. “The adornment of wisdom is unconditioned, uncontaminated, without nonexistence, without recompense, unobstructed, and permanently abiding”〔T374 0523a22–a23〕.The treatise combines the two passages and adds 『菩薩僧』 tr. “bodhisattva Saṅgha”; the received text has no identical full sentence.
8aBoth the Tripiṭaka and Shared Teaching passages say that there is a wish to seek the cart〔T1716 0742a16;0742a23〕.The fire-house verse in the Lotus Sutra reads 「願賜我等,三種寶車。」 tr. “We wish you would bestow upon us the three kinds of jeweled cart”〔T262 0014c04–c05〕.『索車』 tr. “Seeking the cart” condenses the figures, request, and jeweled-cart scene.
9「《攝大乘》明三種乘:理乘、隨乘、得乘。」 tr. “The Mahāyānasaṃgraha teaches three kinds of vehicle: the vehicle of principle, the accompanying vehicle, and the attained vehicle”〔T1716 0742b01–b02〕The passage on gold, mine-earth, and soil in the Mahāyānasaṃgraha does not contain the three names; they have likewise not been located together in the corresponding translations.The referent remains under investigation; later definitions are not presented as wording from the received text.
10The treatise says that Nāgārjuna first used the emptiness in which nothing can be obtained to wash away fixed attachment and later pointed to emptiness in order to teach Dharmas and form the four alternatives〔T1716 0742b14–b19〕.The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom contains throughout its text both emptiness that dispels and Dharma gates that distinguish, but this passage does not name one exclusively corresponding verbatim sentence.This is Zhiyi’s synopsis of Nāgārjuna’s intent in composing the treatise; no verbatim source is fabricated.
10a「多含兒蘇,恐將夭命」 tr. “Feeding an infant too much ghee may endanger its life”〔T1716 0742b26〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra asks the nurse 「汝以愛念多唅兒酥,不知籌量消與不消?」 tr. “Out of affection, did you feed the infant too much ghee without considering whether it could be digested?”〔T374 0385b27–b28〕. The nurse replies 「我於今朝多與兒蘇,恐不能消,將無夭壽?」 tr. “This morning I gave the infant too much ghee; I fear it cannot be digested and may shorten its life”〔T374 0385c01–c02〕.The figures, food, excess, and fear of shortened life agree. The graphs and and the phrases 夭命 and 夭壽 differ.
10b「眾生即涅槃相,不可復滅;涅槃即生死,無滅不生。」 tr. “Sentient beings are immediately the mark of nirvāṇa and cannot be extinguished again; nirvāṇa is immediately birth-and-death, without extinction and without birth”〔T1716 0742c01–c02〕The Vimalakīrti Sūtra reads 「諸佛知一切眾生畢竟寂滅,即涅槃相,不復更滅。」 tr. “The buddhas know that all sentient beings are ultimately quiescent and extinct, immediately the mark of nirvāṇa, and are not extinguished again”〔T475 0542b18–b19〕.The treatise abbreviates the first half and continues with 『涅槃即生死』 tr. “nirvāṇa is immediately birth-and-death.”
11「是乘不動、不出。」 tr. “This vehicle does not move and does not emerge”〔T1716 0742c03〕The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra reads 「是乘亦如是,非住非不住。」 tr. “This vehicle is likewise so, neither abiding nor not abiding”〔T223 0260b28–b29〕 and 「是乘無所住。以不住法、不動法故。」 tr. “This vehicle has nowhere it abides, because it is a Dharma of nonabiding and nonmoving”〔T223 0260c03〕, followed by a question concerning who rides this vehicle and emerges.The contexts of nonmoving and not emerging are both present; the treatise compresses them into a short sentence.
12「其車高廣,眾寶莊校。」 tr. “Its cart is high and broad, adorned with many jewels”〔T1716 0742c18〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「其車高廣,眾寶莊校,周匝欄楯,四面懸鈴」 tr. “Its cart is high and broad, adorned with many jewels, with railings running around it and bells hanging on all four sides”〔T262 0012c18–c19〕.The wording agrees; the treatise excerpts the passage.
12a「又多僕從而侍衛之。」 tr. “It also has many servants attending and guarding it”〔T1716 0743b02〕, followed by 「有大白牛,肥壯多力,行步平正,其疾如風」 tr. “There is a great white ox, well-fed, strong, and powerful, walking evenly and as swift as the wind”〔T1716 0743b03–b04〕The prose reads 「駕以白牛,膚色充潔,形體姝好,有大筋力,行步平正,其疾如風;又多僕從而侍衛之。」 tr. “It is yoked to a white ox whose hide is pure and whose form is handsome, possessing great sinew and strength, walking evenly and as swift as the wind; it also has many servants attending and guarding it”〔T262 0012c22–c24〕. The verse reads 「有大白牛,肥壯多力,形體姝好,以駕寶車。多諸儐從,而侍衛之。」 tr. “There is a great white ox, well-fed, strong, and powerful, handsome in form, yoked to the jeweled cart. Many attendants accompany and guard it”〔T262 0014c14–c16〕.The treatise combines the white-ox and servant expressions from prose and verse into its cart simile for the three tracks; the clauses cannot all be assigned to a single locus.
12b「過茶無字可說」 tr. “Beyond the graph (‘tea’), no graph can be spoken”〔T1716 0742c19〕The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra reads 「法邊竟處故不終不生,過荼無字可說。」 tr. “Because it is the ultimate boundary of Dharmas, it neither ends nor arises; beyond the graph (‘bitter herb’), no graph can be spoken”〔T223 0256b11〕.The graphs and differ; the treatise excerpts the scene of the ultimate boundary in the graph-gate.
13「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」 tr. “The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and, according to the Dharma he has attained, adorns it with the powers of concentration and wisdom and uses it to liberate sentient beings”〔T1716 0742c21–c23〕The Lotus Sutra has the same sentence〔T262 0008a23–a24〕.Verbatim agreement.
14「轉、不轉,皆阿鞞跋致」 tr. “Turning and not turning are both avaivartika, nonretrogression”〔T1716 0742c29–0743a01〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom reads 「云何菩薩轉見?」 tr. “How does a bodhisattva turn from a view?”〔T1509 0416c05〕 and 「於聲聞、辟支佛地見轉故。」 tr. “Because the view turns away from the grounds of śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas”〔T1509 0416c06〕.The received scene is identified by the Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian; 『皆阿鞞跋致』 tr. “both are avaivartika” is the treatise’s own conclusion according to principle.
14a「嗚呼自責,欲問世尊,為失、為不失?」 tr. “Alas, blaming ourselves, we wish to ask the World-Honored One whether we have lost or not lost it”〔T1716 0743a07〕The Lotus Sutra first reads 「嗚呼深自責,云何而自欺?」 tr. “Alas, deeply blaming ourselves, how could we have deceived ourselves?”〔T262 0010c23〕 and later 「欲以問世尊,為失為不失?」 tr. “We wish to ask the World-Honored One whether we have lost or not lost it”〔T262 0011a05〕.The treatise combines two verses and omits wording.
15The treatise uses the half-word teaching as gradual guidance when explaining the Tripiṭaka Teaching〔T1716 0743a08〕.The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra first says 「譬如長者,唯有一子」 tr. “It is like an elder who had only one son”〔T374 0390c15–c16〕 and then 「教其半字,而不教誨毘伽羅論」 tr. “He taught him the half-letters and did not instruct him in the Vyākaraṇa Treatise”〔T374 0390c18〕.The treatise draws on the allusion without presenting it as a verbatim quotation.
16「是乘微妙,清淨第一。」 tr. “This vehicle is wondrous, pure, and foremost”〔T1716 0743b10–b11〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「是乘微妙、清淨第一,於諸世間,為無有上」 tr. “This vehicle is wondrous and pure, foremost and unsurpassed throughout all worlds”〔T262 0015a07–a08〕.The treatise excerpts the passage; punctuation differs.
16aThe treatise says that the present scripture 「正直捨方便」 tr. “directly casts aside skillful means”〔T1716 0743b16–b17〕.The Lotus Sutra reads 「正直捨方便,但說無上道。」 tr. “Directly casting aside skillful means, I teach only the unsurpassed path”〔T262 0010a19〕.The treatise excerpts the first clause and follows it with its own judgment.
17In opening the coarse, the treatise cites the three statements that buddha-nature is one, not one, and neither one nor not-one〔T1716 0743b18;b24;c03〕.The three statements occur together in the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra: 「云何為一?一切眾生悉一乘故。云何非一?說三乘故。云何非一非非一?無數法故。」 tr. “Why is it one? Because all sentient beings alike possess the One Vehicle. Why is it not one? Because three vehicles are taught. Why is it neither one nor not-one? Because there are innumerable dharmas”〔T374 0526a11–a13〕.The treatise uses them in order to open humans and gods, the Distinct Teaching, and the Tripiṭaka and Shared Teachings; the sequence of application belongs to the treatise’s own explanation.
18「而其家大小都無知者」 tr. “Yet no one in the household, old or young, knows”〔T1716 0743b20–b21〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra reads 「如貧女人舍內,多有真金之藏,家人大小無有知者。」 tr. “It is like the house of a poor woman, within which there is a great treasury of true gold, while no one in the family, old or young, knows of it”〔T374 0407b12–b13〕.The treatise excerpts the passage.
18a「一切無礙人,一道出生死。」 tr. “All unobstructed people leave birth-and-death along one path”〔T1716 0743b22〕The Avataṃsaka Sūtra reads 「一切無礙人,一道出生死,」 tr. “All unobstructed people leave birth-and-death along one path”〔T278 0429b19〕.The wording agrees verbatim and only the final punctuation differs; the treatise does not name the scripture, so this is recorded only as a verbatim parallel.

Beginning and End: The Three Paths Are the Three Tracks

No.Wording in the XuanyiReceived witnessRelation
19「無明轉,即變為明。」 tr. “When ignorance is transformed, it immediately becomes illumination”〔T1716 0743c23〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra reads 「若無明轉,則變為明」 tr. “If ignorance is transformed, it then becomes illumination”〔T374 0411a23〕.The treatise omits the graphs and and changes the sentence division.
20「無明即是明。」 tr. “Ignorance itself is illumination”〔T1716 0743c23–c24〕The Vimalakīrti Sūtra reads 「無明實性即是明,明亦不可取」 tr. “The real nature of ignorance is immediately illumination, and illumination too cannot be grasped”〔T475 0551a16〕.The treatise excerpts the passage and omits 『實性』 tr. “real nature.”
21「煩惱之儔,為如來種。」 tr. “The class of afflictions is the seed of the Tathāgata”〔T1716 0744a08–a09〕The Vimalakīrti Sūtra first reads 「一切煩惱為如來種。」 tr. “All afflictions are the seed of the Tathāgata”〔T475 0549b13〕 and later 「塵勞之疇為如來種」 tr. “The class of defilements is the seed of the Tathāgata”〔T475 0549b17〕.The treatise combines 『煩惱』 tr. “afflictions” with 『之疇』 tr. “the class of”; the graphs and likewise differ.

Ten Corresponding Sets I: Three Paths, Three Consciousnesses, Three Buddha-Natures, and Three Prajñās

No.Wording in the XuanyiReceived witnessRelation
22「世間相常住」 tr. “The characteristics of the world constantly abide”〔T1716 0744b01–b02〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「是法住法位,世間相常住」 tr. “This Dharma abides in the Dharma-position; the characteristics of the world constantly abide”〔T262 0009b10〕.The treatise excerpts the passage.
23「諸法從本來,常自寂滅相。」 tr. “All Dharmas from the beginning constantly bear the characteristics of quiescent extinction”〔T1716 0744b04〕The Lotus Sutra has the same sentence〔T262 0008b25〕.Verbatim agreement.
24「於諸過去佛,若有聞一句,皆已成佛道。」 tr. “Before the buddhas of the past, those who heard even one statement all already accomplished the Buddha-path”〔T1716 0744b05–b06〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「於諸過去佛,在世或滅度,若有聞是法,皆已成佛道。」 tr. “Before the buddhas of the past, whether they were in the world or had attained extinction, those who heard this Dharma all already accomplished the Buddha-path”〔T262 0009a26–a27〕.The treatise omits the middle clause, and 『一句』 tr. “one statement” differs from 『是法』 tr. “this Dharma.”
25「深達罪福相,遍照於十方。」 tr. “Deeply penetrating the characteristics of wrongdoing and merit, one illuminates throughout the ten directions”〔T1716 0744b06–b07〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「深達罪福相,遍照於十方,」 tr. “Deeply penetrating the characteristics of wrongdoing and merit, one illuminates throughout the ten directions”〔T262 0035b28〕.Final punctuation differs.
26「惡鬼入其心,罵詈毀辱我,我等念佛故,皆當忍是事。」 tr. “Evil spirits enter their minds and abuse and insult me; because we are mindful of the Buddha, we should all endure this”〔T1716 0744b09–b10〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「惡鬼入其身,罵詈毀辱我。我等敬信佛,當著忍辱鎧」 tr. “Evil spirits enter their bodies and abuse and insult me. Because we revere and trust the Buddha, we shall don the armor of patient endurance”〔T262 0036c15–c16〕, while an earlier passage separately reads 「皆當忍受之」 tr. “We should all patiently endure it”〔T262 0036c13〕.Mind and body, mindfulness and reverent trust, and the sequence of clauses differ.
27The treatise summarizes how, in the time of the Buddha King of Majestic Sound, the fourfold assembly reviled and struck Never Disparaging, was taught by him, and all attained nonretrogression〔T1716 0744b11–b13〕.The Lotus Sutra contains the continuous scene of the fourfold assembly’s reviling, their use of staffs, wood, tiles, and stones, and their later trust and submission〔T262 0050c22–0051a11〕.The scene agrees; the treatise does not present the entire passage as a verbatim quotation.
28The treatise says that Devadatta is a wholesome spiritual friend〔T1716 0744b13–b14〕.The Lotus Sutra reads 「由提婆達多善知識故,令我具足六波羅蜜」 tr. “Because of the wholesome spiritual friend Devadatta, I was enabled to fulfill the six pāramitās”〔T262 0034c26–c27〕.The treatise gives the meaning in synopsis.
29A passage attributed to the Mahāyānasaṃgraha reads 「如金、土、染、淨。染譬六識;金譬淨識;土譬黎耶識。」 tr. “Like gold, earth, defilement, and purity: defilement represents the six consciousnesses, gold pure consciousness, and earth ālaya-consciousness”〔T1716 0744c02–c03〕.The Mahāyānasaṃgraha reads 「於依他性中,分別性為染污分,真實性為清淨分,依他性為染污清淨分。」 tr. “Within dependent nature, discriminated nature is the defiled aspect, true nature the pure aspect, and dependent nature the aspect of both defilement and purity”〔T1593 0121a06–a08〕, and further 「以金藏土為譬。譬如於金藏土中,見有三法:一地界、二金、三土。」 tr. “Take gold, mine-earth, and soil as a simile. Within earth containing gold, three Dharmas are seen: first the earth element, second gold, and third soil”〔T1593 0121a08–a09〕.The threefold scene of gold, mine-earth, and soil agrees; the correspondences to six consciousnesses, pure consciousness, and ālaya-consciousness are the treatise’s adaptation.
30The treatise uses visiting a close friend’s house and lying drunk, wandering in search of food and clothing, and being shown the jewel in one’s robe as a simile for the three consciousnesses〔T1716 0744c04–c08〕.The Lotus Sutra contains the scenes of drunken sleep, wandering in search of food and clothing, and a close friend pointing out the jewel in the robe〔T262 0029a06–a16〕.The root scripture does not teach the three consciousnesses; applying the simile to them is the treatise’s integration.
31「汝實我子;我實汝父。」 tr. “You truly are my son; I truly am your father”〔T1716 0744c14〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「此實我子,我實其父。」 tr. “This truly is my son; I truly am his father”〔T262 0017b13〕. and , as well as 汝父 and 其父, differ.
32「我昔教汝無上道故,一切智願猶在不失。」 tr. “Because I formerly taught you the unsurpassed path, the vow for all-wisdom still remains and has not been lost”〔T1716 0744c14–c15〕The Lotus Sutra first reads 「教化我等,令發一切智心」 tr. “He taught and transformed us, causing us to arouse the mind of all-wisdom”〔T262 0029a16–a17〕 and later 「一切智願,猶在不失。」 tr. “The vow for all-wisdom still remains and has not been lost”〔T262 0029a18–a19〕.The treatise combines the scenes and adds 『我昔教汝無上道故』 tr. “because I formerly taught you the unsurpassed path.”
33「我不敢輕於汝等,汝等皆當作佛。」 tr. “I do not dare disparage you; all of you will become buddhas”〔T1716 0744c16–c17〕The Lotus Sutra has the same sentence〔T262 0050c22–c23〕.Verbatim agreement.
34「是時四眾,以讀誦眾經」 tr. “At that time the fourfold assembly, by reading and reciting the various scriptures”〔T1716 0744c17–c18〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「時諸四眾,計著於法。」 tr. “At that time the fourfold assembly was attached to Dharmas”〔T262 0051b14〕 and later says that Never Disparaging 「復為諸人,廣說是經」 tr. “again extensively taught this scripture for the people”〔T262 0051b20〕.The received text has no identical sentence; the treatise combines elements of the scene.
35「修諸功德」 tr. “cultivate the various merits”〔T1716 0744c18〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「漸具功德,疾成佛道。」 tr. “Gradually fulfilling qualities, they swiftly accomplished the Buddha-path”〔T262 0051b23–b24〕.Near in meaning but not verbatim.
36「長者諸子,若十、二十,乃至三十。」 tr. “The elder’s sons may number ten, twenty, or even thirty”〔T1716 0744c19〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「長者諸子,若十、二十,或至三十」 tr. “The elder’s sons may number ten, twenty, or perhaps as many as thirty”〔T262 0012b18〕.乃至 and 或至 differ.
37「種種性相義,我已悉知見。」 tr. “The meanings of the various natures and characteristics I have already known and seen completely”〔T1716 0744c20〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「我已悉知見。如是大果報,種種性相義,我及十方佛,乃能知是事。」 tr. “I have already known and seen them completely. Such great fruit and recompense, the meanings of the various natures and characteristics—only I and the buddhas of the ten directions can know this matter”〔T262 0005c22–c24〕.The treatise reverses the order of the composite quotation and omits 『如是大果報』 tr. “such great fruit and recompense.”
38「止止不須說,我法妙難思。」 tr. “Stop, stop, there is no need to speak; my Dharma is wondrous and difficult to conceive”〔T1716 0744c27〕The Lotus Sutra has the same sentence〔T262 0006c19〕.Verbatim agreement.
39「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅。」 tr. “This Dharma cannot be shown; the characteristics of words are quiescent and extinct”〔T1716 0744c28〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅,」 tr. “This Dharma cannot be shown; the characteristics of words are quiescent and extinct”〔T262 0005c25〕.Final punctuation differs.
40「我及十方佛,乃能知是相。」 tr. “Only I and the buddhas of the ten directions can know this characteristic”〔T1716 0744c29〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「我及十方佛,乃能知是事。」 tr. “Only I and the buddhas of the ten directions can know this matter”〔T262 0005c24〕. and differ.
41「唯佛與佛,乃能究盡。」 tr. “Only a buddha together with a buddha can ultimately exhaust it”〔T1716 0744c29–0745a01〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「唯佛與佛乃能究盡諸法實相」 tr. “Only a buddha together with a buddha can ultimately exhaust the true mark of all dharmas”〔T262 0005c10–c11〕.The treatise excerpts the passage.
42「我所得智慧,微妙最第一。」 tr. “The wisdom I have attained is wondrous and foremost”〔T1716 0745a01〕The Lotus Sutra has the same sentence〔T262 0009c06〕.Verbatim agreement.
43「我常知眾生,行道不行道,隨應所可度,為說種種法。」 tr. “I always know whether sentient beings practice the path or do not practice it, and according to how they may be liberated, I teach various Dharmas for them”〔T1716 0745a02–a03〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「我常知眾生,行道不行道,隨所應可度,為說種種法。」 tr. “I always know whether sentient beings practice the path or do not practice it, and according to how they should be liberated, I teach various Dharmas for them”〔T262 0044a01–a02〕.隨應 and 隨所應 differ.
44「如來知見廣大深遠。」 tr. “The Tathāgata’s knowing and seeing is vast, great, profound, and far-reaching”〔T1716 0745a04〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「如來知見,廣大深遠」 tr. “The Tathāgata’s knowing and seeing is vast, great, profound, and far-reaching”〔T262 0005c04〕 and earlier 「如來方便知見波羅蜜皆已具足。」 tr. “The Tathāgata’s skillful means, knowing and seeing, and pāramitās are all fully complete”〔T262 0005c03〕.Punctuation differs; the treatise relates complete skillful means and knowing and seeing to prajñā of written words.

Ten Corresponding Sets II: Three Bodhis, Three Great Vehicles, and Three Bodies

No.Wording in the XuanyiReceived witnessRelation
45「我先不言汝等皆得阿耨三菩提。」 tr. “Did I not previously say that all of you would attain unsurpassed complete awakening?”〔T1716 0745a13–a14〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「我先不言:『諸佛世尊以種種因緣、譬喻言辭方便說法,皆為阿耨多羅三藐三菩提耶?』」 tr. “Did I not previously say: ‘The buddhas, the World-Honored Ones, teach the Dharma through various causes and conditions, similes, expressions, and skillful means, all for unsurpassed complete awakening?’”〔T262 0012b09–b11〕.The treatise greatly compresses the passage and adds 『汝等皆得』 tr. “all of you would attain.” The inner quotation marks follow the received witness.
46「非實、非虛、非如、非異,不如三界,見於三界。」 tr. “Neither real nor false, neither thus nor different, not seeing the three realms as [beings in] the three realms see them”〔T1716 0745a14–a15〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「非實非虛,非如非異,不如三界見於三界」 tr. “Neither real nor false, neither thus nor different, not seeing the three realms as [beings in] the three realms see them”〔T262 0042c14–c15〕.The wording agrees; the treatise adds enumeration commas.
47「我成道已來,甚大久遠。」 tr. “Since I attained the path, an exceedingly long time has passed”〔T1716 0745a15〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「我成佛已來,甚大久遠」 tr. “Since I became a buddha, an exceedingly long time has passed”〔T262 0042c19–c20〕.成道 and 成佛 differ.
48「我說少出家,近伽耶城,得三菩提。」 tr. “I say that I left home when young and attained bodhi near Gayā City”〔T1716 0745a16–a17〕The Lotus Sutra reads in one place 「我少出家,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」 tr. “When young I left home and attained unsurpassed complete awakening”〔T262 0042c07〕 and in another 「去伽耶城不遠」 tr. “not far from Gayā City”〔T262 0042b10〕.The treatise combines and summarizes two passages.
49「若我遇眾生,盡教以佛道。」 tr. “Whenever I encounter sentient beings, I teach them all the Buddha-path”〔T1716 0745a17–a18〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「若我遇眾生,盡教以佛道,」 tr. “Whenever I encounter sentient beings, I teach them all the Buddha-path”〔T262 0008b08〕.Final punctuation differs.
50「安住實智中,我定當作佛。」 tr. “Abiding in real wisdom, I will certainly become a buddha”〔T1716 0745a18–a19〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「安住實智中。我定當作佛,」 tr. “Abiding in real wisdom. I will certainly become a buddha”〔T262 0011b06–b07〕.The punctuation between and at the end of the clauses differs.
51「佛子行道已,來世得作佛。」 tr. “After buddha-children have practiced the path, in a future life they will become buddhas”〔T1716 0745a19–a20〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「佛子行道已,來世得作佛,」 tr. “After buddha-children have practiced the path, in a future life they will become buddhas”〔T262 0008b26〕.Final punctuation differs.
52「乘是寶乘,直至道場。」 tr. “Riding this jeweled vehicle, they go directly to the place of awakening”〔T1716 0745a20〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「乘此寶乘,直至道場。」 tr. “Riding this jeweled vehicle, they go directly to the place of awakening”〔T262 0015a13〕.The graphs and differ.
53「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴。」 tr. “The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and, according to the Dharma he has attained, adorns it with the powers of concentration and wisdom”〔T1716 0745a26–a27〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」 tr. “The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and, according to the Dharma he has attained, adorns it with the powers of concentration and wisdom and uses it to liberate sentient beings”〔T262 0008a23–a24〕.The treatise excerpts the passage.
54「於道場知已」 tr. “having known at the place of awakening”〔T1716 0745a29〕 and 「導師方便說」 tr. “the guide teaches through skillful means”〔T1716 0745a29〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「於道場知已,導師方便說。」 tr. “Having known at the place of awakening, the guide teaches through skillful means”〔T262 0009b11〕.The received text joins the phrases in one sentence; the treatise separates them and assigns them to the accompanying and attained vehicles.
55「舍利弗!以本願故,說三乘法。」 tr. “Śāriputra! Because of an original vow, he teaches the Dharma of three vehicles”〔T1716 0745b01〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「舍利弗!彼佛出時,雖非惡世,以本願故,說三乘法。」 tr. “Śāriputra! When that buddha appeared, although it was not an evil age, because of his original vow he taught the Dharma of three vehicles”〔T262 0011b24–b25〕.The treatise omits the middle clause.
56「是乘微妙清淨第一」 tr. “This vehicle is wondrous, pure, and foremost”〔T1716 0745b02〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「是乘微妙、清淨第一」 tr. “This vehicle is wondrous, pure, and foremost”〔T262 0015a07〕.Punctuation differs.
57「於一佛乘」 tr. “within the One Buddha-Vehicle”〔T1716 0745b02〕 and 「分別說三」 tr. “distinguished and taught as three”〔T1716 0745b03〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「於一佛乘分別說三。」 tr. “Within the One Buddha-Vehicle, three are distinguished and taught”〔T262 0007b26〕.The treatise separates the phrases and assigns them to the vehicle of principle and the attained and accompanying vehicles.
58A quotation attributed to the “New Golden Light” reads 「依於法身,得有報身;依於報身,得有應身。」 tr. “On the basis of the Dharma-body, there can be a recompense-body; on the basis of the recompense-body, there can be a response-body”〔T1716 0745b07–b08〕.The Combined Golden Light Sūtra reads 「依於法身故出應身,依於應身故出化身。」 tr. “On the basis of the Dharma-body, the response-body appears; on the basis of the response-body, the transformation-body appears”〔T664 0364c09–c10〕.Recompense and response correspond to response and transformation in the received text; 『得有』 tr. “there can be” and 『故出』 tr. “therefore appears” also differ.
59「佛真法身,猶如虛空,應物現形,如水中月。」 tr. “The Buddha’s true Dharma-body is like empty space; responding to things, it manifests forms like the moon in water”〔T1716 0745b10–b11〕The Golden Light Sūtra has the same sentence〔T663 0344b03–b04〕.Verbatim agreement.
60「佛自住大乘」 tr. “The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle”〔T1716 0745b11〕 and 「定慧力莊嚴」 tr. “adorned by the powers of concentration and wisdom”〔T1716 0745b12〕The two phrases occur together in the Lotus Sutra at 0008a23–a24.The treatise reassigns them through empty space, the moon in the sky, and the moon in water to the Dharma-, recompense-, and response-bodies.
61「唯佛與佛,乃能究盡諸法實相。」 tr. “Only a buddha together with a buddha can ultimately exhaust the true mark of all dharmas”〔T1716 0745b13–b14〕The Lotus Sutra has the same sentence〔T262 0005c10–c11〕.Verbatim agreement.
62「我所得智慧,微妙最第一。」 tr. “The wisdom I have attained is wondrous and foremost”〔T1716 0745b14–b15〕 and 「名稱普聞」 tr. “his name is universally heard”〔T1716 0745b15〕The first phrase occurs at 0009c06; the latter reads 「名稱普聞無量世界」 tr. “his name is universally heard throughout immeasurable worlds”〔T262 0002a07〕.The two phrases come from separate passages and are assigned by the treatise to the recompense- and response-bodies.
62aThe treatise says that not being born and manifesting birth and the like belong to the response-body〔T1716 0745b15〕.The Lotus Sutra says 「隨所應度,處處自說,名字不同、年紀大小,亦復現言當入涅槃」 tr. “According to those who should be liberated, everywhere he speaks of himself with different names and ages and further manifests the statement that he will enter nirvāṇa”〔T262 0042c03–c04〕, and also 「如來如實知見三界之相,無有生死、若退若出,亦無在世及滅度者」 tr. “The Tathāgata knows and sees the characteristics of the three realms as they really are: there is no birth-and-death, neither withdrawal nor emergence, neither being in the world nor one who attains extinction”〔T262 0042c13–c14〕.The scenes of manifest birth and extinction together with actual non-birth and non-extinction correspond; the received text has no identical short phrase.
63「我以相嚴身,光明照十方,為說實相印。」 tr. “I adorn my body with marks, light illuminates the ten directions, and I teach the seal of the true mark”〔T1716 0745b17–b18〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「我以相嚴身,光明照世間,無量眾所尊,為說實相印。」 tr. “I adorn my body with marks, light illuminates the world, revered by immeasurable assemblies, and I teach the seal of the true mark”〔T262 0008b02–b03〕.“Ten directions” and “world” differ; the treatise omits 『無量眾所尊』 tr. “revered by immeasurable assemblies.”
64「深達罪福相,遍照於十方。」 tr. “Deeply penetrating the characteristics of wrongdoing and merit, one illuminates throughout the ten directions”〔T1716 0745b19–b20〕, 「微妙淨法身」 tr. “the wondrous and pure Dharma-body”〔T1716 0745b20〕, and 「具相三十二」 tr. “possessing the thirty-two marks”〔T1716 0745b20〕The Lotus Sutra gives the phrases continuously as 「深達罪福相,遍照於十方,微妙淨法身,具相三十二」 tr. “Deeply penetrating the characteristics of wrongdoing and merit, one illuminates throughout the ten directions; the wondrous and pure Dharma-body possesses the thirty-two marks”〔T262 0035b28–b29〕.The treatise separates the three citations and assigns them to the recompense-, Dharma-, and response-bodies.
65「佛三種身,從方等生。」 tr. “The Buddha’s three kinds of body arise from the vaipulya teachings”〔T1716 0745b21–b22〕The Sūtra on the Practice of Contemplating Bodhisattva Samantabhadra reads 「佛三種身從方等生」 tr. “The Buddha’s three kinds of body arise from the vaipulya teachings”〔T277 0393a10〕.The wording agrees; punctuation differs.
66A quotation attributed to the Treatise on the Nature of the Dharma Realm reads 「水銀和真金,能塗諸色像,功德和法身,處處應現往。」 tr. “Mercury combined with true gold can coat images of many colors; qualities combined with the Dharma-body can responsively appear everywhere”〔T1716 0745b22–b23〕.No single canon number for an extant corresponding Treatise on the Nature of the Dharma Realm has been securely identified; later Tiantai writings preserve only transmitted quotations.The referent remains under investigation; later transmitted quotations are not used to fabricate a received source.

Ten Corresponding Sets III: Three Nirvāṇas, Three Jewels in One Substance, and Three Virtues

No.Wording in the XuanyiReceived witnessRelation
67Masters of the Treatise on the Ten Grounds say 「但有性淨、方便淨。」 tr. “There are only intrinsic purity and expedient purity”〔T1716 0745b25–b26〕.The treatise does not name a text. The Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian judges this passage as first refuting an old interpretation and then giving the correct explanation〔T1717 0899b23–b25〕.This is a report of a school’s teaching and is not assigned to one canonical work; the treatise then separately establishes intrinsic, complete, and expedient purity.
68「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅。」 tr. “This Dharma cannot be shown; the characteristics of words are quiescent and extinct”〔T1716 0745c02–c03〕, followed by 「諸法從本來,常自寂滅相。」 tr. “All Dharmas from the beginning constantly bear the characteristics of quiescent extinction”〔T1716 0745c03–c04〕The two passages occur separately in the Lotus Sutra at 0005c25 and 0008b25.These are two quotations from separate places, not continuous lines of one verse.
69「皆以如來滅度而滅度之」 tr. “All are made to attain extinction through the Tathāgata’s extinction”〔T1716 0745c04–c05〕The Lotus Sutra has the same sentence〔T262 0013c07〕.Verbatim agreement.
70「我成佛已來,甚大久遠。」 tr. “Since I became a buddha, an exceedingly long time has passed”〔T1716 0745c05–c06〕The Lotus Sutra has the same sentence〔T262 0042c19–c20〕.Verbatim agreement.
70a「數數唱生,處處現滅,於此夜滅度,如薪盡火滅」 tr. “Repeatedly proclaiming birth, manifesting extinction everywhere, attaining extinction on this very night like fire going out when its fuel is spent”〔T1716 0745c07〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「佛此夜滅度,如薪盡火滅,」 tr. “The Buddha will attain extinction this very night, like fire going out when its fuel is spent”〔T262 0005a21〕; the “Lifespan” chapter separately has scenes of speaking of oneself everywhere and manifesting the statement that one will enter extinction〔T262 0042c03–c04〕.『此夜滅度、薪盡火滅』 tr. “attaining extinction this very night, fire going out when its fuel is spent” can be located verbatim; 『數數唱生、處處現滅』 tr. “repeatedly proclaiming birth, manifesting extinction everywhere” is the treatise’s synopsis.
71The treatise divides the title 『大般涅槃』 tr. “Great Parinirvāṇa” into “great,” “extinction,” and “crossing over”〔T1716 0745c08–c11〕.The received title is Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra, T374.“Great” is assigned to intrinsic purity, “crossing over” to complete purity, and “extinction” to expedient purity; this is Zhiyi’s title exegesis.
72A quotation attributed to the “Viseṣacinti” reads 「知覺名為佛;知離名為法;知無名為僧。」 tr. “Knowing awakening is called Buddha; knowing separation is called Dharma; knowing nothingness is called Saṅgha”〔T1716 0745c15–c16〕.The Viseṣacintibrahma-paripṛcchā Sūtra reads 「知法名為佛,知離名為法,知無名為僧」 tr. “Knowing Dharma is called Buddha; knowing separation is called Dharma; knowing nothingness is called Saṅgha”〔T586 0037c13–c14〕.知覺 and 知法 differ; the latter two clauses agree.
73In explaining the Three Jewels in one substance, the treatise first uses 「佛自住大乘」 tr. “The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle”〔T1716 0745c17〕 and 「如其所得法,以此度眾生。」 tr. “According to the Dharma he has attained, he uses it to liberate sentient beings”〔T1716 0745c17〕, then uses 「世間相常住」 tr. “the characteristics of the world constantly abide”〔T1716 0745c19〕, 「於道場知已」 tr. “having known at the place of awakening”〔T1716 0745c19〕, and 「導師方便說」 tr. “the guide teaches through skillful means”〔T1716 0745c20〕.The two corresponding groups occur in the Lotus Sutra at 0008a23–a24 and 0009b10–b11.The treatise reassigns the phrases to Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha; the scripture does not separately label the Three Jewels.
74「佛性者亦一」 tr. “Buddha-nature is also one”〔T1716 0745c25〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra has 「亦一非一、非一非非一」 tr. “also one, not one, and neither one nor not-one”〔T374 0526a03–a04〕 and further says 「一切眾生悉一乘故。」 tr. “because all sentient beings alike possess the One Vehicle”〔T374 0526a11–a12〕.The treatise excerpts the passage.
75「我所得智慧,微妙最第一」 tr. “The wisdom I have attained is wondrous and foremost”〔T1716 0745c27〕 through 「決了聲聞法,是諸經之王」 tr. “decisively clarifying the Dharma of śrāvakas, it is king among the scriptures”〔T1716 0745c28〕In the Lotus Sutra the first phrase occurs at 0009c06, while the latter two sentences read 「決了聲聞法。是諸經之王」 tr. “It decisively clarifies the Dharma of śrāvakas. It is king among the scriptures”〔T262 0032a15〕.The passages belong to separate chapters; the treatise gathers them under prajñā-virtue with 『乃至』 tr. “through.”
75a「智慧門難解難入」 tr. “the gateway of wisdom is difficult to understand and difficult to enter”〔T1716 0745c27〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「佛智慧甚深無量,其智慧門難解難入」 tr. “The Buddha’s wisdom is exceedingly profound and immeasurable; its gateway of wisdom is difficult to understand and difficult to enter”〔T262 0005b26〕.The treatise excerpts the phrase concerning the gateway of wisdom.
76「八千聲聞於法華中,得受記莂,如秋收冬藏,見如來性,更無所作。」 tr. “Eight thousand śrāvakas received predictions in the Lotus, like autumn harvest and winter storage, saw the Tathāgata’s nature, and had nothing further to do”〔T1716 0746a08–a09〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra first says 「能令眾生見於佛性」 tr. “able to cause sentient beings to see buddha-nature”〔T374 0420a23〕 and then 「八千聲聞,得受記莂成大果實,如秋收冬藏,更無所作。」 tr. “Eight thousand śrāvakas received predictions and accomplished the great fruit, like autumn harvest and winter storage, and had nothing further to do”〔T374 0420a24–a25〕.The treatise incorporates the phrase on seeing buddha-nature into the sentence on the śrāvakas and omits 『成大果實』 tr. “accomplished the great fruit.”
77「種種性相義,而我皆已見。」 tr. “The meanings of the various natures and characteristics I have already seen completely”〔T1716 0746a11〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「我已悉知見。如是大果報,種種性相義」 tr. “I have already known and seen them completely: such great fruit and recompense, the meanings of the various natures and characteristics”〔T262 0005c22–c23〕.The order is reversed, and and differ.
78「世間相常住。於道場知已,導師方便說。」 tr. “The characteristics of the world constantly abide. Having known this at the place of awakening, the guide teaches through skillful means”〔T1716 0746a12–a13〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「世間相常住,於道場知已,導師方便說。」 tr. “The characteristics of the world constantly abide; having known this at the place of awakening, the guide teaches through skillful means”〔T262 0009b10–b11〕.The treatise changes the first comma to a full stop.
79A passage attributed to the “Treatise” reads 「佛性水常不輕。」 tr. “the water of buddha-nature [and] Never Disparaging”〔T1716 0746a14〕 and says that Never Disparaging knew sentient beings possess buddha-nature.In one passage the Commentary on the Lotus Sutra says that Never Disparaging 「示現眾生皆有佛性故」 tr. “demonstrated that all sentient beings possess buddha-nature”〔T1519 0009a14〕; in another it says 「受持此經得佛性水成阿耨多羅三藐三菩提故」 tr. “because by receiving and retaining this scripture one obtains the water of buddha-nature and accomplishes unsurpassed complete awakening”〔T1519 0010a26–a27〕.The treatise writes the two contexts of the water of buddha-nature and Never Disparaging together; the received text has no identical short sentence.
80「安置諸子祕密藏中,我亦不久當入其中」 tr. “Placing the children in the secret treasury, I too will enter it before long”〔T1716 0746a15–a16〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra reads 「一切眾生,及以我子四部之眾,悉皆安住祕密藏中,我亦復當安住是中」 tr. “All sentient beings and my children in the fourfold assembly will all abide in the secret treasury; I too will again abide in it”〔T374 0376c09–c11〕.The treatise abbreviates the passage; “before long” and “again,” and “enter” and “abide,” differ.
81「佛自住大乘,以此度眾生。終不以小乘濟度諸眾生,悉以如來滅度而滅度之。」 tr. “The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and uses it to liberate sentient beings. He never uses the Lesser Vehicle to save sentient beings, but makes them all attain extinction through the Tathāgata’s extinction”〔T1716 0746a17–a18〕In one place the Lotus Sutra reads 「終不以小乘,濟度於眾生。佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」 tr. “He never uses the Lesser Vehicle to save sentient beings. The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and, according to the Dharma he has attained, adorns it with the powers of concentration and wisdom and uses it to liberate sentient beings”〔T262 0008a22–a24〕; in another it reads 「皆以如來滅度而滅度之。」 tr. “All are made to attain extinction through the Tathāgata’s extinction”〔T262 0013c07〕.The treatise combines and rearranges two passages; and also differ.
82A quotation attributed to the “Commentary Treatise” reads 「《法華》為祕藏,兩經文義宛宛恒同。」 tr. “The Lotus is the secret treasury; the wording and meaning of the two scriptures have always plainly agreed”〔T1716 0746a20–a21〕.The received Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom has not yielded this sentence. Sengrui’s afterword to the Lotus Sutra has the near parallel 「《法華經》者,諸佛之祕藏,眾經之實體也。」 tr. “The Lotus Sutra is the secret treasury of the buddhas and the real substance of the scriptures”〔T262 0062b07〕.The referent remains under investigation. The afterword is only a near parallel; both author and genre differ.

Resolving through the Siddhāntas

No.Wording in the XuanyiReceived witnessRelation
82a「苦塗水洗,養嬰兒以適時。」 tr. “Smearing bitterness and washing with water, one raises an infant in accord with the proper time”〔T1716 0746b02〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra first says 「以苦物用塗其乳」 tr. “She used a bitter substance to smear her breast”〔T374 0407c03〕. After the medicine has taken effect, it says 「遂至藥消,母人以水淨洗其乳,喚其子言:『來與汝乳。』」 tr. “When the medicine had taken effect, the mother washed her breast clean with water and called to her child, saying, ‘Come, I will give you milk’”〔T374 0407c05–c07〕.The mother, infant, bitter smearing, washing with water, and movement from refusal to calling agree.
83A passage attributed to the “Treatise” reads 「三悉檀是世諦,心所行處,可破可壞。第一義悉檀,是心不行處,諸佛聖人心所得法,不可破壞,即是真諦。」 tr. “The first three siddhāntas are conventional truth, where the mind can operate, and can be broken and destroyed. The siddhānta of ultimate meaning is where the mind does not operate, the Dharma attained by the minds of buddhas and noble ones; it cannot be broken or destroyed and is true truth”〔T1716 0746b16–b18〕.The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom reads 「第一義悉檀者,一切法性,一切論議語言,一切是法非法,一一可分別破散;諸佛、辟支佛、阿羅漢所行真實法,不可破,不可散。」 tr. “As for the siddhānta of ultimate meaning: the nature of all Dharmas, all discursive words, and all claims that something is or is not Dharma can each be distinguished, broken, and dispersed; the real Dharma practiced by buddhas, pratyekabuddhas, and arhats cannot be broken or dispersed”〔T1509 0060c07–c10〕. It further reads 「除第一義悉檀,諸餘論議,諸餘悉檀,皆可破故。」 tr. “Apart from the siddhānta of ultimate meaning, all other arguments and all other siddhāntas can be broken”〔T1509 0060c12–c13〕 and 「過一切語言道,心行處滅」 tr. “Beyond every path of words, where the operation of mind is extinguished”〔T1509 0061b07–b08〕.The treatise combines three places in synopsis and adds its judgment in terms of the Two Truths; this is not one continuous passage in the received text.
84The treatise uses the worldly siddhānta, the individually adapted siddhānta, the counteractive siddhānta, and the siddhānta of ultimate meaning to discern the ten sets of three dharmas〔T1716 0746b03–b15〕.The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom explicitly lists 「有四種悉檀:一者、世界悉檀,二者、各各為人悉檀,三者、對治悉檀,四者、第一義悉檀。」 tr. “There are four siddhāntas: first the worldly siddhānta, second the individually adapted siddhānta for each person, third the counteractive siddhānta, and fourth the siddhānta of ultimate meaning”〔T1509 0059b18–b20〕.The names of the four siddhāntas occur in the received text; the treatise separately assigns them to the three tracks and three virtues.
84aThe treatise uses the destructible conjured city and unsurpassable, indestructible treasure-place to judge the first three siddhāntas and the Middle Way as ultimate meaning〔T1716 0746b23–b26〕.The Lotus Sutra says that the guide allows the weary assembly to enter the city and that if they can proceed, they will reach the treasure-place〔T262 0026a07–a08〕. After they have rested, he 「即滅化城」 tr. “immediately extinguishes the conjured city”〔T262 0026a11〕 and tells them that the treasure-place is near and the city was only created as a skillful means〔T262 0026a11–a13〕.The scenes of temporary rest in the conjured city and final orientation toward the treasure-place agree.

The most important distinction throughout the comparisons above is not the quantity of wording, but three kinds of relation: scriptural phrases directly preserved by the treatise, excerpts and composite citations Zhiyi forms according to scriptural meaning, and the treatise’s own corresponding assignments. The correspondences among three consciousnesses, three bodies, and three nirvāṇas belong to the Xuanyi’s argument. The root scriptures supply similes or textual evidence, but do not thereby already list these sets of three dharmas themselves.

4. Essential Explanations from the Shiqian [the Mirror]

The Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian first fixes the eye of the seven gates with 「謂唯一妙無復差別,機宜不純開總出別,即約教也。」 tr. “This means that there is only the one wondrous, without further differentiation. Because capacities are not pure, the specific is opened from the general; this is precisely in terms of the teachings”〔T1717 0896a04–a05〕. The three dharmas are originally the one wondrous, while the separate explanation opens because of capacities rather than because their substance was originally fractured. The purpose of judgment lies in opening; after opening, beginning and end and universal inclusion are explained, and the siddhāntas finally resolve the questions.

In the general gate, Zhanran separates Zhiyi’s three reasons for repeating the subject from Zhang’an’s appended statement. 『私謂』 tr. “I privately say” is added by Zhang’an when the record was revised and finalized, while 『記中』 tr. “in the record” refers to the master’s teaching recorded by Zhang’an. The opening of the provisional through the three statements is still judged to arise entirely from the perfect; the appended statement therefore cannot be read as establishing a separate source for the three vehicles.

The separate explanation first treats opening and combining in general and then distinguishes the Four Teachings. The Tripiṭaka and Shared Teachings both lose the meaning of transport after reaching realization and therefore have the wish to seek the cart. The Distinct Teaching first correctly explains the three tracks, next cites the Mahāyānasaṃgraha to distinguish attachment, and finally urges understanding of refutation and establishment. The Perfect Teaching then explains in order the three dharmas, three obstructions, and substance and function. Zhanran summarizes the vehicle-substances of the Four Teachings with 「藏別兩教咸以智慧為體,通圓兩教咸以真性為體」 tr. “The Tripiṭaka and Distinct Teachings both take wisdom as substance; the Shared and Perfect Teachings both take true nature as substance”〔T1717 0897b22–b23〕. This prevents the correspondences of the Perfect Teaching from being projected over the preceding three.

Judging coarse and wondrous proceeds first through the Four Teachings and then through the five flavors. Opening the coarse to reveal the wondrous applies the three statements on buddha-nature in order to humans and gods, the Distinct Teaching, and the Tripiṭaka and Shared Teachings. The conclusion of 『開』 tr. “opening” is 「還示眾生本有覺藏,使大小咸知,昔覆今顯名之為開。」 tr. “It again shows sentient beings their originally present treasury of awakening, causing great and small alike to know it; formerly covered and now revealed is called opening”〔T1717 0898b22–b23〕. Opening therefore does not create another wondrous Dharma, but makes what is originally present cease to be concealed.

The explanation of beginning and end first treats the ten suchnesses of one realm generally, then narrows to the ten realms in a single thought. If ordinary beings wholly lacked the three dharmas, there would be nothing to open. Zhiyi therefore moves directly from the nature and characteristics of the three paths to those of the three tracks and then passes through cultivated virtue to the ultimate. The ten corresponding sets are gathered as 「始自所化極迷,終至能化入滅。復一一條中皆約六即」 tr. “Beginning with the deepest delusion of those being transformed and ending when the transforming one enters extinction; within each individual set the six identities are also applied”〔T1717 0898c26–c27〕. The ten sets are not isolated lists, but a single chain from the round of the three paths to the secret treasury of the three virtues.

Within the ten sets, Zhanran carefully distinguishes the three consciousnesses as a provisional teaching gate, the first two scriptural citations on the three bodies from the later five citations from the present scripture, and the three nirvāṇas as first refuting an old interpretation and then presenting the correct explanation. For the Three Jewels in one substance, the Viseṣacintibrahma-paripṛcchā Sūtra as preserved by the Shiqian retains the latter two phrases, knowing separation and knowing nothingness. The treatise’s 『知覺』 tr. “knowing awakening” and the received text’s 『知法』 tr. “knowing Dharma” must each retain its own wording.

The resolution through the siddhāntas first explains why the names differ, then uses the four siddhāntas to explain the ten sets. It discusses in detail only the first set, the three tracks, and the last, the three virtues; the intervening eight follow by analogy. Finally, Zhanran closes with 「十法共成如意珠法」 tr. “The ten Dharmas together accomplish the Dharma of the wish-fulfilling jewel”〔T1717 0900b24〕 and 「十中居半」 tr. “It occupies the halfway point among the ten”〔T1717 0900b25〕, then says that the cause and fruit of self-practice are complete while the aspect of transforming others is still lacking. 『半』 tr. “Half” is thus a sequential marker within the ten subtleties, not a deficiency in the Wondrous Dharma.

5. Explanations of Various Masters

Zhiquan’s Fahua Jing Xuanqian Zhengshi contains a continuous commentary extending from 「不並不別,與不縱不橫,名異義同。」 tr. “Neither parallel nor separate and neither horizontal nor vertical differ in name but agree in meaning”〔X0592 0606c04–c05〕 through 『果即三法玅』 tr. “the fruit is precisely the subtlety of the three dharmas.” He says that “neither parallel nor separate” and “neither horizontal nor vertical” differ in name but agree in meaning, and further distinguishes 『如來之藏』 tr. “the Tathāgata’s treasury,” which comprehensively includes all three dharmas, from 『如來藏』 tr. “tathāgata-garbha,” which is assigned particularly to one track. This is a Qing-dynasty old commentary’s reading and does not replace the wording of Zhiyi or Zhanran.

Zhiquan divides the great cart into height and breadth, the white ox, and the attendants. Drawing on a later commentary, he explains the 『禿乘』 tr. “bald vehicle” as possessing the cart’s substance while lacking its equipment. For the ten corresponding sets he arranges the first eight through 「無始流轉,不出三道。流轉由識,識內具性。照性由智,智滿成道。道由乘至,至故身顯。顯必涅槃」 tr. “Beginningless wandering does not depart from the three paths. Wandering depends on consciousness, and within consciousness nature is complete. Nature is illuminated through wisdom; when wisdom is complete, the path is accomplished. The path is reached by the vehicle; because it is reached, the bodies are revealed. Revelation necessarily culminates in nirvāṇa”〔X0592 0607c22–c24〕 and then concludes with the Three Jewels and three virtues. He also expressly records that the received Viseṣacintibrahma-paripṛcchā Sūtra reads 『知法』 tr. “knowing Dharma,” which can be viewed alongside the treatise’s 『知覺』 tr. “knowing awakening.”

Yuanqing’s Fahua Shimiaobuer Men Shizhuzhi says 「眾生心因既具三軌,此因成果,名三涅槃。因果無殊,始終理一。」 tr. “Since the mental cause of sentient beings already possesses the three tracks, when this cause accomplishes the fruit it is called the three nirvāṇas. Cause and fruit do not differ; the principle is one from beginning to end”〔X0926 0315a05–a06〕, and places the fifth subtlety at the three tracks, three bodies, and three virtues in which the ultimate fruit abides. Zhili’s Shibuermen Zhiyaochao likewise says 「一念心因既具三軌,此因成果名三涅槃。」 tr. “Since the mental cause of a single thought already possesses the three tracks, when this cause accomplishes the fruit it is called the three nirvāṇas”〔T1928 0714a29〕, and explains the separation and integration of cultivation and nature through the three bodies and three wisdoms, the three consciousnesses and three paths, and the three bodhis, three Great Vehicles, and three nirvāṇas.

Zhiyuan’s Niepan Jing Shu Sande Zhigui also directly says 「若了三德在一心中,則此經一部居于方寸,況法華開顯十方三世同說三軌」 tr. “If one understands that the three virtues are within one mind, this entire scripture resides within the square inch [of the heart]; how much more when the Lotus opens and reveals that the ten directions and three times alike teach the three tracks”〔X0662 0374b16–b18〕. Elsewhere it says 「眾生心因既具三軌,此因成果名三涅槃,因果無殊始終理一」 tr. “Since the mental cause of sentient beings already possesses the three tracks, when this cause accomplishes the fruit it is called the three nirvāṇas; cause and fruit do not differ, and the principle is one from beginning to end”〔X0662 0479a24–0479b01〕. Materials from both the Shanjia and Shanwai traditions directly connect cultivation and nature, the three tracks and three virtues, and the cause and fruit of beginning and end. Their explanations are recorded side by side here without adjudicating superiority.

6. Terminology

The three dharmas and the three tracks. The treatise itself explains that the three dharmas are the three tracks, while 『軌』 tr. “track” means a norm or standard. Their three names are true nature, contemplative illumination, and supporting accomplishment. Although there are three names, there is only one Great Vehicle Dharma; they must not be understood as three separable entities.

True nature, contemplative illumination, supporting accomplishment. True nature is the nature that is neither false nor changing. Contemplative illumination is quiescent yet constantly illuminating. Supporting accomplishment is the Dharma realm containing immeasurable practices and equipment. The different teaching gates assign vehicle-substance and vehicle-equipment to the three in different ways; only the Perfect Teaching takes true nature as substance and contemplative illumination and supporting accomplishment as the equipment that transports.

Ultimate truth, the emptiness of ultimate meaning, tathāgata-garbha. These are three names fully possessed by the One Buddha-Vehicle. In the general explanation, the three names are not fixed as three and are likewise not fixed as one. Zhang’an’s private explanation then uses the three statements of the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra to open three classes of skillful means.

Nature-virtue and cultivated virtue. The three tracks of nature-virtue are the beginning, and the three tracks of cultivated virtue the end. From nature-virtue arise designation, contemplative practice, resemblance, and partial realization through the ultimate. The account of beginning and end does not move from prior absence to later existence; both concealment and manifestation remain neither vertical nor horizontal.

Vehicle-substance and vehicle-equipment. The substance ridden cannot be temporarily discarded, while contemplative illumination and supporting accomplishment, which transport, are like the jeweled adornments and white ox of a cart. The Four Teachings select different vehicle-substances and must be understood passage by passage.

Three obstructions and three virtues. Dust-and-sand delusions obstruct supporting accomplishment, delusions of views and thought obstruct contemplative illumination, and fundamental ignorance obstructs true nature. When the three tracks are revealed, they are respectively called liberation, prajñā, and Dharma-body. The Dharma-body is what is adorned, while concentration and wisdom are what adorn it; together they form the Great Vehicle.

Teaching-vehicle, practice-vehicle, realization-vehicle. These names indicate the teaching heard, practice cultivated, and realization attained. They do not mean the three vehicles of śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and bodhisattvas.

Opening the coarse to reveal the wondrous. Through the three statements on buddha-nature, the various skillful means are decisively understood and the originally present treasury of awakening is revealed after former concealment. Opening does not delete earlier Dharma gates; it ceases to isolate skillful means outside the wondrous.

Vertical and horizontal integration. The three tracks from nature-virtue through the ultimate are vertically integrated. Using the three tracks to connect the ten sets of three dharmas is horizontal integration. Here vertical and horizontal describe directions of inclusion and are not equivalent to the vertical sequence and horizontal division of the three dharmas refuted earlier.

Ten sets of three dharmas. The three paths, three consciousnesses, three buddha-natures, three prajñās, three bodhis, three Great Vehicles, three bodies, three nirvāṇas, Three Jewels in one substance, and three virtues. The ten form one beginning-to-end course from deepest delusion to entry into extinction.

Half wish-fulfilling jewel. The first five subtleties have discerned the cause and fruit of self-practice, so the ten subtleties have reached their midpoint and are called half a jewel. The jewel remains the complete Wondrous Dharma; 『半』 tr. “half” marks only the sequence of the treatise.

Later tradition commonly uses 『五時八教』 tr. “the Five Periods and Eight Teachings,” 『化儀』 tr. “modes of transformation,” 『化法』 tr. “Dharmas of transformation,” 『藏通別圓』 tr. “Tripiṭaka, Shared, Distinct, and Perfect,” 『迹門十妙』 tr. “the ten subtleties of the Trace Gate,” 『本門十妙』 tr. “the ten subtleties of the Origin Gate,” and 『一念三千』 tr. “three thousand in one thought-moment” as outline terms. The actual wording of this passage refers to the Four Teachings, five flavors, the first half of the ten subtleties, and an ordinary mind’s single thought possessing the ten Dharma realms. These later summary expressions can serve as traditional guides but are not presented as the passage’s own verbatim self-designations.

7. Similes · Cross-Reading · Carrying Forward

The three dots of the siddham letter i and the three eyes of Maheśvara show that the three dharmas can neither be placed in parallel nor separated. The jewel, radiance, and treasure of a wish-fulfilling jewel further show that the three are neither identical nor separate. The great cart takes true nature as the cart’s body, the tathāgata-garbha as its many jewels and servants, and the emptiness of ultimate meaning as the white ox. Height, breadth, jeweled adornment, power, evenness, and speed like the wind all accomplish one another within one cart.

The Distinct Teaching’s discernment of attachment uses two warning similes. Adding water to long-standing ice means that old attachment remains while new attachment makes it thicker. Feeding an infant too much ghee means that even a teaching of the real can damage the life of wisdom if grasped. Both similes target rigid attachment; neither judges a particular scripture or treatise to be entirely without value.

Opening the coarse to reveal the wondrous uses the poor woman’s treasury of gold to show original possession without knowledge. The wheel-turning king who both conquers and settles, the sun that both dispels darkness and gives life, and the physician who both removes a film and nourishes the eye show wisdom breaking fixed and unfixed characteristics. The account of beginning and end then uses ice and water, bamboo and fire, and mistaking south for north: illumination does not depart from ignorance, wholesome nature can be activated through adverse conditions, and the Dharma-body is not established elsewhere outside the path of suffering.

The integration of the three paths uses fire arising from fuel to explain affliction and contemplative illumination, and uses Never Disparaging’s abuse and Devadatta as a wholesome spiritual friend to explain how evil can support accomplishment. The integration of the three consciousnesses borrows the jewel-in-the-robe simile and assigns drunken sleep, wandering, and being shown the jewel in the robe to the three consciousnesses in order. These assignments belong to the Xuanyi’s integration; the root scripture does not itself list the three consciousnesses.

The resolution through the siddhāntas uses giving three in the morning and four at night, smearing bitterness and washing with water, square and round forms according to the receptacle, and a thousand carts following one track to show that names differ according to capacities while the meaning attained agrees. The conjured city and treasure-place further distinguish a destructible skillful means from an indestructible final orientation. The entire unit carries the preceding four subtleties into the subtlety of the three dharmas and completes the fruit-stage of self-practice there; only afterward does it turn to the subtleties of stimulus and response and the other forms of transforming others. This is its carrying-forward position within the ten subtleties.

8. Placement of the Editions

One. This unit uses T1716 as its base, beginning at 0741b07 and ending at 0746c06. The corresponding passage in the Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian is T1717 0896a01–0900b29. Every page anchor uses the nearest line marker in the same edition before the first graph of the quotation; a long passage that crosses a page is not assigned only the general anchor at the paragraph’s beginning.

Two. The body of this unit contains one variant-reading anchor at 0745c17. In the sentence on the Three Jewels in one substance, commonly punctuated editions read 『佛自住大乘』 tr. “The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle,” while the original Taishō reading is 『佛自在大乘』 tr. “The Buddha is masterful in the Great Vehicle.” Both forms are recorded side by side without adjudicating which is correct, and neither is allowed to subsume the other.

Three. The passage 0741c09–c17 is an appended statement added by Zhang’an when the record was revised and finalized; its boundary is established by T1717 0896a14–a24. The rest of the body continues to follow the title attribution as Zhiyi’s teaching recorded by Guanding.

Four. The three vehicle-names attributed to the Mahāyānasaṃgraha, the Treatise on the Nature of the Dharma Realm, and the “Commentary Treatise” statement on the secret treasury all remain referents requiring further investigation. 『地人言』 tr. “masters of the Treatise on the Ten Grounds say” is a report of a school. 『般若如金剛』 tr. “prajñā is like a vajra” and 『動、不動皆是毘尼』 tr. “moving and not moving are both vinaya” are likewise not assigned to a single named source in this passage. No later explanation is used to fabricate an original source for any of them.

Five. The nearest line marker before the graph 『三』 tr. “three,” which begins the entrance into the three buddha-natures, is 0744c11; 0744c12 must not be invented from a visual blank line. Long quotations, composite quotations, and repeated sentences each use the line at which their own first graph actually occurs. When the same sentence appears more than once in the treatise, the actual occurrence within this unit governs.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing — with AI-assisted consistency checking

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0