妙法蓮華經玄義 辨體·入實相門

〔T33 0784a07〕
心要Essence

因為門可以通人,也可以被人抓住。

實相像一座隔著絕壑的深山,教與行是飛梯。沒有飛梯,人無從登臨;把飛梯抱在懷裡,卻也永遠到不了山頂。門的意義正在能通,不在成為新的所有物。

所以四門又像通往清涼池的四條入口。利根、鈍根,定心、散心,都可由相應之門入池。四門也像大火:不伸手抓火,便可暖身熟食;一旦取著,邪見之火反燒自己。問題從來不只是選哪一扇門,而是走門時有沒有把門變成執著。

教與行也不是兩條互不相干的路。有人聞法,如快馬見鞭影便入正道;有人修觀,如暗夜見電光而看清道路;更多人要聞後起觀、觀後再聞。教使觀有方向,觀使所聞成為親證。兩者彼此資助,門才真的打開。

可是知道方向,還不等於會走。論中用十件事檢查一條路:境看得正不正,心發得真不真,定慧是否調和,破執是否周遍,通塞是否分明,道品與對治是否得宜,次位是否清楚,障礙是否忍得住,最後對順道功德是否仍生愛著。少了其中一環,再好的門名也可能成塞。

甘果與毒果的譬,正把這件事說得很尖銳。九分毒果仍是毒,一分甘果仍是甘;千斤疊華,也比不上一兩真金。修行不以名目多、聲勢大取勝,而看每一項是否真正成就。

這也是為什麼四根手指可以同指一月。眾生過去薰習不同,欲樂、所宜、所治不同,佛便用四種門接引;月沒有四個,手指卻不能強迫只留一根。契合根機,門就是妙;違背根機,或在門上生著,門就變麁。

最後的開顯,便不只是宣布某扇門最高。它把煩惱開為菩提,把生死開為涅槃,把凡夫開為妙人,也把聲聞的法、教、行、理逐層開入真實。已妙者無須再開;尚未入妙的人、法、門、理,才是慈悲真正要抵達的地方。

門的心要因此很簡單:選一條真正適合自己的路,完整地走,走到不再抓住路。飛梯跨過絕壑,手指指到月亮,門便完成了它的工作。

Why can four gateways all lead to the true mark and still confine people? Because a gateway can give someone passage, and it can also be grasped.

The true mark is like a deep mountain beyond an impassable ravine; teaching and practice are the flying ladder. Without the ladder, there is no way to climb. Hold the ladder tightly against your chest, however, and you will never reach the summit. A gateway means something that gives access, not a new possession.

The four gateways are therefore also like four entrances to a cooling pool. Those of sharp and dull faculties, with concentrated or scattered minds, can all enter through a corresponding gateway. They are also like a great fire: if you do not reach out to grasp it, it can warm your body and cook your food; once you become attached, the fire of wrong views burns you instead. The question is never merely which gateway you choose, but whether walking through it turns the gateway into an attachment.

Teaching and practice are not two unrelated roads. Some people hear the Dharma and, like a swift horse seeing the shadow of a whip, enter the right road. Some cultivate contemplation and, like seeing lightning in the dark, see the road clearly. Many more must contemplate after hearing and hear again after contemplating. Teaching gives contemplation direction; contemplation lets what is heard become direct realization. Only through mutual support does the gateway truly open.

Yet knowing the direction is not the same as knowing how to walk. The treatise examines a road through ten matters: whether the object is seen correctly, the resolve genuinely aroused, concentration and wisdom harmonized, attachment pervasively broken, passage and obstruction clearly distinguished, the factors of the path and counteractives properly used, stages clearly known, obstructions endured, and finally attachment to virtues that accord with the path avoided. If even one link is missing, the finest gateway-name may become an obstruction.

The sweet and poisonous fruits make this point sharply. Nine parts poisonous fruit remain poison; one part sweet fruit remains sweet. A thousand pounds of layered blossoms do not equal one ounce of real gold. Practice does not prevail through many names or grand momentum, but through the actual accomplishment of each item.

This is also why four fingers can point at one moon. Sentient beings’ past cultivation, desires, suitability, and illnesses differ, so the Buddha draws them in through four gateways. There are not four moons, yet one cannot force all the fingers to disappear but one. When a gateway corresponds to faculties, it is wondrous; when it opposes them or is grasped, it becomes coarse.

The final opening and revelation therefore do not merely announce that one gateway is highest. They open affliction as bodhi, birth-and-death as nirvāṇa, and ordinary beings as wondrous persons. They also open the śrāvakas’ Dharma, teaching, practice, and principle, layer by layer, into reality. What is already wondrous needs no further opening. People, Dharmas, gateways, and principles not yet wondrous are where compassion must actually arrive.

The heart-essence of the gateway is thus simple: choose a road truly suited to you, walk it completely, and walk until you no longer grasp the road. Once the flying ladder crosses the ravine and the finger points to the moon, the gateway has completed its work.

原典Canonical · verbatim

隋天台智者大師說《妙法蓮華經玄義》〔私記緣起=沙門灌頂述〕· 大正藏 T33n1716〔起 T33 0784a07〕。段/行首〔T33 …〕=大正藏頁·欄·行錨(換頁一枚)。

〔T33 0784a07〕○第四明入實相門者,夫實相幽微,其理淵奧,如登絕壑,必假飛梯,欲契真源,要因教行,故以教行為門。下文云:「以佛教門出三界苦。」「佛子行道已,來世得作佛。」門名能通,此之謂也。略為四意:一、略示門相。二、示入門觀。三、示麁妙。四、示開顯。 示門相者,夫佛法不可宣示,赴緣說者,必以四句詮理,能通行人入真實地。《大論》云:「於如是法,說第一義悉檀,所謂一切實,一切不實,一切亦實亦不實,一切非實非不實。」如是皆名諸法之實相。實相尚非是一,那得言四?當知四是「入實相門」耳。又云:「四門入清涼池」,是門無礙,非唯利者得入,鈍者亦入。非唯定者,散心、專志、精進者,亦得入。又云:「般若有四種相,所謂有相、無相、乃至非有、非無相。」般若尚非一相,云何四相?當知亦是入般若門也。又云:「般若波羅蜜譬如大火焰,四邊不可取,邪見火燒故。」若不觸火,溫身熟食;若觸火者,火則燒身;身既被燒,溫食無用。四門本通般若,除煩惱,辦大事。若取著者,則成邪見,燒於法身。法身既燒,四門通何等?若不觸火,門則能通也。 若以佛教為門者,教略為四〔云云〕。若於一教,以四句詮理,即是四門,四四合為十六門。若以行為門者,稟教修觀,因思得入,即以行為門。藉教發真,則以教為門。若初聞教,如快馬見鞭影即入正路者,不須修觀。若初修觀,如夜見電光即得見道者,不更須教。並是往昔善根習熟,今於教門得通,名為信行;於觀門得通,名法行。若聞不即悟,應須修觀;於觀悟者,轉成法行。若修觀不悟,更須聽法;聽法得悟,轉名信行。教即為觀門,觀即為教門。聞教而觀,觀教而聞,教觀相資,則通入成門。教觀合論,則有三十二門,此語其大數耳。細尋於門,實有無量。五百身因,三十二不二門,善財遊法界,值無量知識,說無量教門,無量觀行。如喜見城,千二百門,實相法城,豈唯一轍?經云:「說種種法門,宣示於佛道。」 今且約四教,明十六門相。 三藏四門者。 初、明有門,謂生死法,本非世性、微塵、父母所作,乃是無明正因緣法,出生諸行煩惱、業、苦,三道悉皆是有。一切有為,無常、苦、空、無我,能發得煗、頂、世第一法,發真無漏因,用真修道。此則道諦,亦是有。子果既斷,得有餘、無餘涅槃。故《大集》云:「甚深之理不可說,第一實義無聲字,陳如比丘於諸法,獲得真實之知見。」此則因滅會真,真亦是有。此是諸阿毘曇論之所申,見有得道,即有門也。 二、空門者,即是彼教析正因緣,無明老死,苦集二諦,三假浮虛,破假實,悉入空平等,發真無漏,因空見真,空即第一義之門也。故須菩提在石室,觀生滅無常入空。因空得道,見佛法身,恐此是《成實論》之所申也。 三、明有、空門者,即是彼教明正因緣生滅,亦有亦空。若稟此教,能破偏執有無之見,見因緣有空,發真無漏,因有無見真,有無即是第一義之門也。此是迦旃延因門入道,故作《昆勒論》,還申此門也。 四、非有非無門者,即是彼教明正因緣生滅,非有非無之理。若稟此教,能破有無邊邪執見,見因緣非有非無,發真無漏,因非有非無見真,非有非無即第一義之門也。惡口車匿,因此入道,未見論來。有人言犢子阿毘曇申此意,彼論明我在第五不可說藏中,我非三世,故非有我;非無為,故非無我。此恐未可定用也。 二、明通教四門相者,此是摩訶衍門,通通通別,不可偏取。 今約通通論四門者,上三藏四門,皆滅色入空,如析實人頭等六分,求人不得,故名為空。通教四門皆即色是空,如觀鏡像,六分即空,不待析盡為空。《大論》云:「佛告比丘:觀空即疊,觀疊即空。」此是體門異析門也。 三藏觀生空得道,三藏觀生空得道已,又更觀法空,生、法二境不融。今通門生空即法空,法空即生空,無二無別。《大品》云:色性如我性,我性如色性,此二皆如幻化。 有人言:三藏破計實性,約實法求我不得,但是觀性空;大乘明相自性是空,不須撿已為空。此乃一往之言。《大品》云:常性空,無不性空時,曉了諸法,如幻化水月鏡像,豈止相空而已! 秖約此幻化即判四門。論云:「一切實一切不實,一切亦實亦不實,一切非實非不實。」佛於此四句,廣說第一義悉檀。一切實為有門者,若業若果善惡等法,乃至涅槃皆幻化。譬鏡中像,雖無實性,而有幻化頭等六分,為有門也。 〔T33 0785a05〕諸法既如幻化,幻化本自無實,無實故空,乃至涅槃亦如幻化,如鏡中像,假有形色,求不可得,是為空門。 諸法既如幻,故名為有。幻不可得,故名為空。如鏡中像,見而不可見,不可見而見,是亦空亦有門。 幻有尚不可得,況復幻空而當可得?即是兩捨為門。是通教即空之四門也。若三乘共稟而根性不同,各於四句入第一義,故此四句皆名為門。故青目注論云:「諸法實相有三種。」今是三乘人同入此門,見第一義者,是即空之一種也。 三、明別教四門者,若用《中論》偈:「亦名為假名」也而辨四門者,即如《大論》四句,亦是此四句意。 所言別者,下異藏通,有七義故別;上異圓教,又歷別入中,故言別。此意正出《大經》,但多散說,今約乳等喻,即顯別四門也。文云:佛性如乳有酪,石中有金,力士額珠,即是有門。若明石無金性,乳無酪性,眾生佛性,猶如虛空。大般涅槃空、迦毘羅城空,即是空門。又云:佛性亦有亦無。云何為有?一切眾生悉皆有故。云何為無?從善方便而得見故。又譬乳中亦有酪性,亦無酪性,即是亦有亦無門也。若明佛性即是中道,雙非兩遣。又譬乳中非有酪性,非無酪性,即是非空非有門。 別教菩薩,稟此四門之教,因見佛性住大涅槃,故此四句即是別教之四門。一往用擬別門經文,或時為圓門,此義在下料簡〔云云〕。 圓教四門相者,此門明入佛性第一義,一往與別門名義是同,細尋意趣,別有多途。分別同異,在下委論〔云云〕。 二、示入門觀,即為二:先、略示入門處。二、略示入門觀。 略示入門處者,能通教門,大為十六,所通之理,但是偏圓兩真,前八門同入偏真,後八門同入圓真。何故偏真理一門八耶?三藏四門,紆迴隘陋,名為拙度。通教四門是摩訶衍,寬直巧度。門有巧拙之殊,能通為八,真理無二,所通唯一。譬如州城,開四面門。四面偏門,以譬三藏;四面直門,以譬通教;偏直既殊,能通為八,使君是一,所通不二也。 別教四門,偏而未融;圓四門,圓而且融。偏圓既殊,能通為八,圓真不二,所通唯一。譬如帝城,開四面門,四面偏門,以譬別教;四面直門,以譬圓教,偏直既殊,能通為八,帝尊不二所通唯一〔云云〕。 問: 小乘一種四門,摩訶衍何故三種四門? 答: 小乘淺近,一生斷結,喻如小家。大乘深遠,通處則長,譬如大家,須千門萬戶也,三四何足為多耶? 問: 摩訶衍門那得三人見真? 答: 此門正意通大,傍通於小,譬如王國有通門別門,別門通朝士,通門通朝市,不可以民庶登踐,謂為民門。摩訶衍通門亦如是,正通實相,傍通真諦,故三乘灰斷,兼由此門,不可以兼通偏真,而名小乘門也。 二、略示入門觀者,先、明三藏有門觀,彼有門中,具於信法、信行,聞說即悟,此心疾利,得道方法難可示人。且約法行觀門,即為十意:一、識所觀境。二、真正發心。三、遵修定慧。四、能破法遍。五、善知通知塞。六、善用道品。七、善用對治。八、善知次位。九、善能安忍。十者、法愛不生。阿毘曇中具此十意,其文間散,論師設欲行道,不知依何而修,如惑岐路,莫識所從。今撮其要意,通冠始終,則識有門入道之觀也。 一、明所觀境者,即是識正無明因緣,生一切法也。若謂世間苦樂之法,從毘紐天生,或言從世性生、微塵生,皆邪因緣生。若言自然法爾,無誰作者,此無因緣生。無因緣生是破因不破果,邪因緣亦是破正因果,是等悉非正因緣境,所不應觀。數存隣虛,論破隣虛,此與邪無相濫,殆非正因緣境。何者?隣虛有無,未免二見,猶是無明顛倒,倒故是集,集故感麁細等色。無明顛倒,既其不實,所感苦果報,那得定計有無?故《大論》云:「色若麁若細,總而觀之,無常無我。」無我故無主,若麁若細,若因若緣,若苦若集,若依若正,皆無常無主,悉是無明顛倒所作。如阿毘曇門廣說。是名識正因緣所觀之境,不同外道邪無因緣也。 二、發心真正者,既識無明顛倒,流轉行識,乃至老死,如旋火輪,欲休息結業,正求涅槃,發二乘心,出離見愛,不要名利,但破諸有,不增長苦集,唯志無餘,其心清淨,不雜不偽,此心真正,名正發心,不同外道天魔也。 三、遵修定慧者,行人既誓求出,有依波羅提木叉住修道,但罪障紛馳,心不得安,道何由剋?為修四念處,學五停心,破五種障。五停事觀即是定,定生念處即慧,慧定均停,故名安心。又定慧調適,故名停心。若無定慧,若單定慧,若不均調定慧,皆不名賢人。如世間賢人,智德具足,智則靡所不閑,德則美行無缺,許由、巢父,乃可稱賢。若多智寡德名狂人,多德寡智名癡人,狂癡皆非賢也。賢名賢能,亦名賢善,善故有德,能故有智,智德具足,故稱賢人。行者亦爾,修四念處慧,學五停心定,定慧具足。 〔T33 0786a11〕云何數息具足定慧?制諸覺散,從一至十,知息及數,無常生滅,念念不停。又若觀不淨,當深厭穢惡,能觀所觀,無常生滅,速朽虛誑,誑諸眾生,厭觀起恚,須慈定相應,見他得樂,亦知此定,及彼樂相,無常生滅。因緣觀時,橫觀四生,悉是因緣生法;竪觀三界,亦是因緣生法。從緣生者,悉是無常無我。諸障起者,應須念佛,亦如是。是名五停具修定慧。 有定故不狂,有慧故不愚,依此安心,為眾行基址,發生煗頂,入苦忍真明,隣聖為賢,義在於此。不同外道,不知鑽搖,漿猶難得,況復酪蘇等也! 四、破法遍成,見有得道,其安心定慧。若五停心後,修共念處時,帶不淨等,遍破諸法,事理悉成。若五停心後,單修性念處時,一向理觀,以無常之慧,遍破諸見。破見之觀,如《中論》下兩品所明也。 佛初轉法輪,不說餘法,但明無常,遍破一切外道,若有若無,乃至非有非無,神及世間,常無常等,六十二見,使得清淨。今阿毘曇師受他破云:無常是小乘,常是大乘,常得破無常,無常不得破常。若得前意,此不應然。未得道前,執心所計,常、無常、亦常亦無常、非常非無常等。法塵對意根而生諸見,見從緣生,從緣生者,悉是無常。云何外道有常、樂、我、淨?如是四倒,悉用無常破之。故五百比丘語達兜言:「但修無常,可以得道,可以得通。」如六群比丘為他說法,純說無常。當知見無深淺,悉為無常所破,不同舊醫,純用乳藥也。 五、知通塞者,前雖遍破諸見之過,未見其德。過即是塞,德即是通。若有見中八十八使,乃至非有非無不可說見中八十八使,悉從緣生,名之為塞,塞故須破。復識其通者,所謂有見中道滅,乃至非有非無不可說見中道滅,如是道滅,從因緣生,名之為通,通何須破?若不識諸見,謂是事實、餘妄語,執見成業,愛潤感果,豈非塞耶?能於諸見,一一皆知無常顛倒,不生計著,不執則無業,無業則無果。如是達者,則有道滅,豈不名通?不同外道,如蟲食木,是蟲不知是字非字也。 六、善修道品者,豈唯識此通塞而已?當修道品,進諸法門。謂觀此有見,乃至不可說見,皆依於色,污穢不淨,即身念處。若受有受,乃至受不可說受,皆依三受,受即是苦,名受念處。觀於諸見所起想行,悉是無我,名法念處。觀諸見之心,念念無常,名心念處。觀此四觀,名有為法中得正憶念,得是念故,四倒則伏,是名念處。勤修四觀,名四正勤。定心中修,名四如意。五善根生,故名五根。五根增長,遮諸惡法,故名五力。定慧調停,名七覺分。安隱道中行,名八正道。今非約位道品,但就通脩論三十七耳。若一停心門作三十七品,餘停心亦如是。阿毘曇道諦中,應廣分別〔云云〕。 此三十七品是行道法,將至涅槃城有三門,所謂苦下二行,為空解脫門。集道各四,苦下有二,是無作解脫門。滅下有四,是無相解脫門。若涅槃門開,即得入也。故佛於《須跋陀羅經》中,決定師子吼,唯我法中有八正道,外道法中,尚無一道,何況八道耶。 七、善脩對治者,若利人即入,若不入者當修助道。故論云:十二禪等悉是助開門法,正慧既弱,遮障得起,修助道為援。論云:「貪欲起,教修不淨,背捨等;緣中不自在,當教勝處;緣中不廣普,當教一切處。若少福德,當教無量心;若欲出色,當教四空。」如是等悉是助道,助開門法,不同外道,於根本禪,起愛見慢也。 八、善識次位者,雖修如此正助等法,不得即言我是聖人,叨濫真似,不識賢聖。今明識真似階差,自知非聖,增上之慢則不得生。不同外道,戒取見取,計生死法,以為涅槃也。 九、善修安忍。別相念處力弱,未甚通泰。轉修總相念處,或總一、總二乃至總四,是時應須安忍,使諦觀成就,轉入煗法,似道煙生。《大經》云:「煗雖有漏有為,還能破壞有漏有為。」「我弟子有,外道則無。」又,若安忍即成頂法,頂法成名忍,到傍邊,如其不忍,則退還此邊。故云:頂法退為五逆,煗法退為闡提。是故此中善須安忍內外諸障,不同外道不能安忍細微遮法也。 〔T33 0787a03〕十、法愛不生者,上來既得四善根生,若起法愛,雖不退為五逆、闡提,而不得入見諦。是則三番縮觀,進成上忍,世第一法發苦忍真明,十六剎那得成初果,或成超果;或重用觀,斷五下五上,得成無學。若利人用觀,節節得入;若鈍用觀,具來至十。阿毘曇中雖復廣解,不出十意。 五百阿羅漢作《毘婆沙》,正申有門得道,云何而言是調心方便?四門調適,俱能得道。若生取著,俱不得道。若但云見有得道,見空不得道,云何異於外人?故《大論》云:「若不得般若方便,則墮有無。」今以十法為方便,直入真門,永異外道也。是為有門入真之觀也。餘空門、亦空亦有門、非空非有門,入真之觀始終方便,比於有門,各各不同。然俱會偏真,斷三界惑,更無異也。其三門準有,例應十觀,大同小異,可以意得,今不能煩記〔云云〕。 次、明通教有門觀者,例為十意,列名〔云云〕。體解諸法,皆如幻化。三人發心雖同,亦有小異〔云云〕。中論師云:此中是大乘聲聞。今言非也。經云:「欲得聲聞緣覺,當學般若。」論云:「聲聞及緣覺,解脫涅槃道,皆從般若得。」經論不云是件,人師謬耳。雖知定慧不可得,而安心二法,以幻化之慧,遍破四見、六十二見及一切諸法,知幻化中苦集名為塞,知幻化中道滅名為通。以不可得心修三十七品,以無所治學諸對治,識乾慧地乃至佛地,幻化之慧,不為外魔所動,內障所退。諸法不生而般若生,亦不愛著,即得入真,若智若斷無生法忍,比前為巧,準作可知,不復委記。餘三門十意,大同小異,可以意得,亦不煩記文也。 次、明別教有門觀,即為十意〔云云〕。 一、觀境者,超出凡夫四見四門外,亦非二乘四門法,亦非通教四門法。諸四門法為境,不名實相,非生死涅槃;如來藏者,乃名為妙有,有真實法。如此妙有為一切法而作依持,從是妙有出生諸法,是為所觀之境也。 二、明發心者,菩薩深觀實相妙有,不為生死所遷,金藏草穢,額珠鬪沒,貧窮孤露,甚可愍傷。菩薩為此起大慈悲,四弘誓願。《思益》有三十二大悲。《華嚴》云:「不為一人、一國、一界微塵人,乃為法界眾生,發菩提心。」如是發心有大勢力,如師子吼。既發心已,安心進行,如前所說種種定慧,如是時中,宜應修如是定;如是時中,宜應修如是慧。定愛慧策,安心修道,依止二法,不餘依止,是為安心法也。還以妙有之慧,遍破生死一切諸見,六十二等,功德黑闇,皆悉不受。遍破涅槃,沈空取證,猶如大樹,不宿怨鳥。於一一法中,明識通塞,如雪山中,備有毒草,亦有藥王。 菩薩須知,如此心起,即是六道苦集,名為塞;如是心起,即是二乘道滅,名為通。又如是心起是二乘苦集,名為塞;如是心起是菩薩道滅,名為通。如是心起,名為菩薩苦集;如是心起,名佛道滅。於苦集中,能知非道,通達佛道;能知佛道,起於壅塞,了了無滯,是為識通塞。 善修道品者,夫三十七品是菩薩寶炬陀羅尼。破倒念處,勤行定心,五善根生,能排五惡,定慧調適,安隱道中行。離十相故名空三昧。亦不見空相,名無相三昧。不作願求,名無作三昧。是行道法,近涅槃門。若修諸法對治之門,所謂常無常,恒非恒,安非安,為無為,斷不斷,涅槃非涅槃,增上非增上,常樂觀察諸對治門,助開實相也。 從初十信、十住、十行、十迴向、十地、等覺、妙覺,聖位深淺悉知無謬,終不謂我叨極上位,內忍善惡兩覺,違從二賊;外忍八風,以忍力故,不為傾動。設證相似之法,法愛不起,不墮菩薩,頂生名法愛,無是愛故,即入菩薩位。破無明穢草,顯出妙有金藏,得見佛性,入於實相。是為有門修入實觀也。 餘空門,亦空亦有門,非空非有門,入實之觀,例亦為十。諸門方便,雖各不同,俱會圓真,理無差二,三門觀法,準有可知,不復委記〔云云〕。 妙法蓮華經玄義卷第八下 妙法蓮華經玄義卷第九上 天台智者大師說 次、明圓門入實觀者,先、簡圓門。次、明圓觀。 上三藏門,滅實色通真,不得意多諍;體門即幻色通真,示人無諍法;別門體滅生死色,次第滅法性色通中,不得意多諍;圓門即生死色是法性色,即法性色而通中,示人無諍法,故文云:「無上道」,又云:「而行深妙道」,即此義也。 〔T33 0788a03〕上兩門不通中,不俟分別。別、圓兩種俱通中。論其同異略為十:一、融不融。二、即法不即法。三、明佛智非佛智。四、明次行不次行。五、明斷斷惑不斷斷惑。六、明實位不實位。七、果縱果不縱。八、圓詮不圓詮。九、約難問。十、約譬喻。尋此十意,明識八門同異也。 一、明融不融者,別教四門,所據決定妙有善色,不關於空;據畢竟空,不關於有,乃至非空非有門亦如是。四門歷別,當分各通。不得意者,作定相取,似同性實,殆濫冥初生覺〔云云〕。前、三藏有門,已破外道邪計先盡;次、空等三門,破邪則少;又、通巧四門,破三藏之拙;又、別教之門,破通門之近,已不與二乘共,何況外道冥覺而濫妙有!妙有依如來藏分判四門,何得同彼尼犍性實?如周璞、鄭璞,名同質異,貴賤天懸。今時學地論人,反道還俗,竊以此義,偷安莊老,金石相糅,遂令邪正混淆,盲暝之徒不別涇渭。若得諸四門意,精簡真偽,偷盜不生。 然別門雖作定說,如是諍論,諸佛境界,二乘不知,豈同外道耶?圓門虛融微妙,不可定執,說有不隔無,約有而論無;說無不隔有,約無而論有。有無不二,無決定相,假寄於有,以為言端。而此有門亦即三門,一門無量門,無量門一門,非一、非四,四一一四,此即圓門相也。 復次更約破會明融不融相。若破外道邪見,不破二乘邪曲,亦不破大乘方便。又會不圓者,如《淨名》中會凡夫反復,聲聞無也。會塵勞之儔為如來種,無為入正位,不能反復。生死惡人,煩惱惡法而皆被會;二乘善法,四果聖人而不被會。又般若中,明二乘所行,念處、道品,皆摩訶衍。貪欲、無明、見愛等,皆摩訶衍。善惡之法,悉皆被會。亦不會惡人及二乘人等,不辨其作佛,此即別門攝也。 若圓破者,從別教已去,皆是方便。故迦葉自破云:自此之前,我等皆名邪見人也。既言邪見之人,即無圓正道法,則人法俱被破也。別教人法尚爾,何況草庵人法!二乘尚爾,何況凡夫人法!是則圓破,無所固留。 圓會者,會諸凡夫著法之眾,「汝等皆當作佛」,「我不敢輕於汝等」。五逆調達亦與受記,龍畜等亦與受記,況二乘菩薩等!「世間治生產業,皆與實相不相違背」,即會一切惡法也。「汝等所行是菩薩道」,析法二乘尚被會,況通況別!「汝是我子,我則是父」,無有人法而不被會,俱皆融妙,此即圓門攝也。 復次,更約經文前後明圓不圓相。若先明不融門,此說地前;後明不融門而言證融,此說向後。或先明證融門,此說向後;後明不融門,此說地前者,此皆別門攝。若先明融門證亦融,此說信後;後明證不融,此說住前。或先明證不融,此說住前;後明證融,此說信後者,此皆屬圓門攝〔云云〕。 二、即法、不即法者,若說有為門,此有非生死有,出生死外,別論真善妙有。空門者,出二乘真外,別論畢竟空,乃至非有非無門亦如是。是為別四門相。若有為門,即生死之有是實相之有,一切法趣有,有即法界,出法界外,更無法可論;生死即涅槃,涅槃即生死,無二無別,舉有為門端耳;實具一切法,圓通無礙,是名有門。三門亦如是,此即生死之法,是圓四門相也。復次,即法有遍不遍,判圓別相,例前分別〔云云〕,約五住遍不遍。復次,即法不即法,或前或後,判別圓相,如前分別〔云云〕。 三、約佛智、非佛智者,若有為門,分別一切智,了達空法;分別道種智,照恒沙佛法。差別不同者,是菩薩智即別四門相也。若有為門,分別一切種智,五眼具足,圓照法界正遍知者,即諸佛之智,是圓四門相也。復次,別門說圓智,圓門說別智,或前或後,分別別、圓相,例如前〔云云〕。復次,別門證圓智,圓門證別智,或前或後,分別別、圓,如前分別〔云云〕。 四、約次第、不次第者,若以有為門,依門修行,漸次階差,從微至著,不能一行中即無量行,乃至非空非有門亦如是,是別四門相。若以有為門,一切法趣有門,依門修行,亦一切行趣有行,一行無量行名為遍行,乃至非空非有門亦如是,是圓四門相。復次,別門圓行,圓門別行,或前或後,分別別圓,例如前〔云云〕。 五、約斷斷、不斷斷者,夫至理虛無,無明體性本自不有,何須智慧?解惑既無,安用圓別?《涅槃》云:「誰有智慧?誰有煩惱?」《淨名》曰:「婬、怒、癡性即是解脫」,又「不斷癡愛起於明脫」,此則不論斷不斷。《大經》云:「闇時無明,明時無闇。有智慧時,則無煩惱。」此用智慧斷煩惱也。 〔T33 0789a01〕若別有門,多就定分割截,漸次斷除五住,即是思議智斷也,乃至三門亦如是,是為別四門相。若圓有門,解惑不二,多明不斷斷,五住皆不思議,即是不思議斷,乃至三門亦如是,是為圓四門相。 復次,圓門說斷,別門說不斷斷,或前或後,判別圓相者,例如前說〔云云〕。 六、約實位、非實位者,若有門明斷界內見思,判三十心位;斷界外見、思、無明,判十地位;等覺後心,斷無明盡;妙覺常果,累外無事,此乃他家之因,將為己家之果,皆方便非實位也。後三門大同小異,皆是別四門相。 若有門從初發意,三觀一心,斷界內惑;圓伏界外無明,判十信位,進發真智;圓斷界外見思無明,判四十心位;等覺後心,無明永盡,妙覺累外,此是究竟真實之位,乃至三門亦如是,是名圓四門相。復次,別門說實位,圓門說不實位,別門證實位,圓門證不實位,或前或後,皆如前分別〔云云〕。 七、約果縱、果不縱者,若有為門,從門證果,三德縱橫:言法身本有,般若修成,解脫始滿。不但果德縱成,因亦局限。如地人云:初地具足檀波羅蜜,於餘非為不修,隨力隨分,檀滿初地,不通上地。餘法分有而不具足者,是義有餘,三門亦如是,是為別四門相。 若有為門,從門證果,三德具足,不縱不橫,亦因如是一法門具足一切法門,通至佛地。《華嚴》云:「從初一地具足諸地功德。」《大品》云:「初阿字具足四十一字功德。」三門亦如是,是為圓四門相。復次,別門說果不縱,圓門說果縱,或前或後,判圓別相,例前〔云云〕。 八、約圓詮、不圓詮者,若有為門,門不圓融,或融一或融二:門前章,偏弄引;門中章,詮述不融不即菩薩智,乃至偏譬喻等;門後,還結不融不即等,三門亦如是,是為別四門相。若有為門,一門即三門:門前,圓弄引;門中,詮述融即佛智,乃至圓譬喻等;門後,結成融即等。三門亦如是,是為圓四門相。復次,別門詮圓,圓門詮別,或前或後,分別別圓之相,例前〔云云〕。 九、約問答者,若有門明義未辨圓、別,須尋問答覈徵,自見圓、別指趣,三門亦如是〔云云〕。 十、約譬喻者,諸門前後,或舉金銀寶物為譬,或舉如意日月為譬,或用別合,或用圓合,圓、別之相自顯〔云云〕。 今以十意玄覽眾經,圓、別兩門,朗然明矣。 復約五味,分別少多:乳教兩種四門;酪教一種四門;生蘇四種四門;熟蘇三種四門;此經一種四門〔云云〕。 今經十義者:「觀一切法空如實相」,決了聲聞法是諸經之王,開方便門,此是融凡小大之人法也。「一切世間治生產業,皆與實相不相違背。」即客作者,是長者子,此是即法之義也。「開、示、悟、入佛之知見」,今所應作唯佛智慧,即佛慧也。「著如來衣、座、室等」,即不次第行也,不斷五欲而淨諸根。「又過五百由旬」,即不斷斷義也。「五品、六根淨」,「乘寶乘、遊四方」,即實位也。「佛自住大乘,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」即果不縱也。「合掌以敬心,欲聞具足道。」即今佛文前圓詮也。「諸法實相義,已為汝等說。」即古佛文後圓詮也。「智積、龍女」,問答顯圓也。「輪王頂珠」「其車高廣」,皆圓喻也。十意既足,圓門明矣! 融門四相,今當說。若言「佛之智慧微妙第一」,又云:「我以如來智慧觀彼久遠猶若今也」。智知妙法,有門也。一切法空,常寂滅相,終歸於空,空門也。諸法常無性,佛種從緣起,即亦空亦有門也。非如非異,非虛非實,雙非兩捨,即非空非有門也。 四相標門,十意簡別,故知此經,明圓四門也〔云云〕。 二、明入實觀者,上已知四圓門,今依有門修觀,觀則為十〔云云〕。 對前十二思議之門名不思議境,不思議境即是一實四諦。謂生死苦諦,不可思議,即空、即假、即中。即空故,方便淨;即假故,圓淨;即中故,性淨;三淨一心中得名大涅槃。《淨名》曰:「一切眾生即大涅槃。」故名不可思議四諦也。不可復滅,此即生死之苦諦,是無作之滅,亦是集道也。煩惱集諦不可思議,即空、即假、即中。即空故,名一切智;即假故,名道種智;即中故,一切種智;三智一心中得名大般若。《淨名》曰:「一切眾生即菩提相。不可復得。」此即煩惱之集,而是無作道諦,亦是苦滅,故名不思議一實四諦也。亦是真善妙色,何者?生死即空故名真,生死即假故名善,生死即中故名妙,此名有門不可思議境也。 二、發真正心者,一切眾生即大涅槃,云何顛倒?以樂為苦,即起大悲,興兩誓願:令未度者度,令未斷者斷。一切煩惱即是菩提,云何愚闇?以道為非道,即起大慈,興兩誓願:令未知者知,未得者得。無緣慈悲,清淨誓願,慈善根力,任運吸取一切眾生也。 〔T33 0790a02〕三、安心者,既體解成就,發心具足,豈可臨池觀魚,不肯結網,裹糧束脚,安坐不行?修行之要,不出定慧。譬如陰陽調適,萬物秀實,雨旱不節,焦爛豈生?若兩輪均平,是乘能運,二翼具足,堪任飛升。體生死即涅槃名為定,達煩惱即菩提名為慧。於一心中,巧修定慧,具足一切行也。 四、破法遍者,以此妙慧,如金剛斧,所擬皆碎;如無翳日,所臨皆朗。若生死即涅槃者,分段、變易,苦諦皆破;若煩惱即菩提者,四住五住,集諦皆破。雖復能破,亦不有所破。何者?生死即涅槃,故無所破也。 五、識通塞者,如主兵寶,取捨得宜,強者綏之,弱者撫之。知生死過患名為塞,即涅槃名為通;煩惱惱亂名為塞,即是菩提名為通。始從外道四見,乃至圓教四門,皆識通塞;節節執著即是塞,節節亡妙名為通。若不識諸法夷嶮,非但行法不前,亦亡去重寶也。 六、善識道品者,觀生死即涅槃,十界生死色陰皆非淨非不淨,乃至識陰非常非不常。能破八顛倒,即法性四念處,念處中具道品、三解脫及一切法。又知涅槃即生死,顯四枯樹;知生死即涅槃,顯四榮樹;知生死涅槃不二,即一實諦,非枯非榮,住大涅槃也。 七、善修對治者,若正道多障,應須助道,觀生死即涅槃,治報障也;觀煩惱即菩提,治業障煩惱障也。 八、善知次位者,生死之法本即涅槃,理涅槃也。解知生死即涅槃,名字涅槃也。勤觀生死即涅槃,觀行涅槃也。善根功德生,即相似涅槃也。真實慧起,即分真涅槃也。盡生死底,即究竟涅槃也。觀煩惱即菩提,亦如是。 九、善安忍者,能安內外強軟遮障,不壞觀心。若觀生死即涅槃,不為陰、入、境、病患、業、魔、禪、二乘、菩薩等境所動壞也。若觀煩惱即菩提,不為諸見、增上慢境所動壞也。 十、無法愛者,既過障難,道根成立,諸功德生。觀生死即涅槃,故諸禪三昧功德生。觀煩惱即菩提故,諸陀羅尼無畏不共諸般若生。觀生死涅槃不二,故法身實相生。相似功德順理而生,喜起順道法愛、生名愛法,不上不退,名為頂墮。此愛若起,即當疾滅;愛若滅已,破無明,開佛知見,證實相體。觀生死即涅槃,故證得解脫;煩惱即菩提,故證得般若;此二不二,證得法身。一身無量身,無上寶聚,如意圓珠,眾法具足。是名有門入實,證得經體。餘三門亦如是。 是十種觀,經文具足。「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅,諸餘眾生類,無有能得解。」又「我法妙難思」,即不思議境。於一切眾生中起大慈心,於非菩薩中起大悲心,「我得三菩提時,以神通力、智慧力引之,令得住是法中」,即正發心也。「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴」,即是安於二法,自成成他也。破有法王,即是破法遍也。又如日月光明能除諸幽瞑,「斯人行世間,能破眾生闇」,即破法遍也。「有一導師,將導眾人,明了心決定,在嶮濟眾難」,善知通塞也。淨藏淨眼,善修三十七品諸波羅蜜,即是兩意也。增道損生,遊於四方,即是識次位也。安住不動如須彌頂,著如來衣,即安忍也。雖聞是諸聲,聽之而不著,其意等六根,皆言清淨若此,又云真淨大法,即無法愛也。是十種觀散在經文而人不知,今撮聚十數,入有門為觀,乃至三門,小異大同,十觀入實,亦復如是。 復次,此十觀意,非但獨出今經;大小乘經論,備有其意。如摩黎山,純出栴檀,固非外道四韋陀典,及此間莊老之所載也。世人咸共講讀,而對文不知,若欲學道,全無方便。悲夫!徒知𤚲捋,不解鑽搖。若識十意,於小乘四門俱用入真,於大乘四門俱用入實,既入實已,如食乳糜,更無所須。半如意珠、全如意珠,布施一切,雖有此施,不見有人輕生重道,勤心修習。不受不用,徒施何益?我則悔焉,雖無所益,作毒鼓因,欲具知之,委如《止觀》〔云云〕。 三、明諸門麁妙者,為二:一、就能所判麁妙。二、約諸門判麁妙。 能、所為四句,門名能通,理是所通。自有能通麁,所通亦麁;能通妙,所通麁;能通麁,所通妙;能通妙,所通亦妙。 三藏四門,扶事淺近,故能通為麁;但詮偏真,所通亦麁。通教四門,大乘體法,如實巧度,能通為妙;三乘偏證,所通為麁。別教四門,教道方便,能通為麁;詮入圓真,所通為妙。圓教四門,證道實說,能通為妙;即事而圓,所通亦妙也。 又自有帶麁能、所,生蘇教是也。不帶麁能、所,乳教是也。自有帶麁所、不帶麁能,熟蘇教是也。自有帶麁能、不帶麁所,圓接通、接別是也,涅槃中諸門亦是也。 〔T33 0791a01〕問: 經云:唯有一門而復狹小,為麁故稱一小?為妙故稱一小? 答: 此義當通用,不可局在一門。何者?如三藏四門赴機異說,故言四;同是佛教,故言一。門門方便異,故言四;同向涅槃,故言一。所通從能通,故言四;能通會所通,故言一。文字中無菩提,是約教論狹小;譬如隘路,不受二人並行,即約行論狹小。教行兩門取真難契,即約理論狹小〔云云〕。 通教亦如是,逗緣別說故為四;同是佛教,故言一。觀法不同故有四;俱向無生故為一。所隨於能故為四;能隨於所故為一。通教即事而真,文字中有菩提,善惡俱觀皆不可得,即是並行,不約此義論狹小,但教觀取真理難當,故名理為狹小〔云云〕。 別教四門亦如是,為四機說,故有四;同是佛教,故言一。入實觀異,故言四;俱向一實,故言一。所隨於能,故言四;能會於所,故言一。不即生死是涅槃,教狹小;不即煩惱是菩提,故行狹小。教行取理難當,名理論狹小。 圓教四門亦如是,逗四種機,故言四;皆是佛說,故言一。入實觀異,故言四;四觀向實,故言一。將門名理,故言四;以理應門,故言一。此教即生死是涅槃,教不狹小;煩惱即菩提,行不狹小。而此教觀取理難當,名理為狹小。若依經文「唯有一門而復狹小」者,正語教行之門,取理不當,故言狹小也。 今拓開一句,處處不同,豈可定執守一文耶?若得此意,麁妙自明〔云云〕。 二、約諸門判麁妙者,先明三藏四門皆是能通,執著四門俱皆壅礙,成壞麁妙,更無優劣。此則不可偏判。若從法為語,有則附俗,入道則拙;空則傍真,入道則巧。故《釋論》云:「為鈍根人說生空,為利根說法空。」即其義也。亦有亦無門,望前為巧,望後是拙,非有非無門則是巧也。《大論》云:「半有半無者,名為鈍人。」是約四門法判麁妙也。今約根性便宜,若宜有門,有門成,三門壞。若宜無門,無門成,三門壞。乃至第四門亦如是。若就一門皆得四悉檀者,皆名為成;失四悉檀者,皆名為壞。還就一門赴欲為得,乖情為失;當宜為得,不當宜為失;治病為得,不治病為失;見第一義為得,不見第一義為失。傳有成壞,約此得論麁妙也。又,約十觀判麁妙者,觀因緣境正為得,境邪僻為失;發真正心為得,不爾為失;安心得所為得,安心不調為失;破法遍為得,不遍為失;知通塞為得,不知通塞為失;乃至順道法愛不生為得,順道法愛生為失。若一門十法成就,則此門為妙,餘門為麁。若餘門十法成就,此門不成就,則此為麁,餘門為妙〔云云〕。 通四門麁妙者,通理唯一,一不可說,有何形比麁妙可論?就赴機說門,不無優劣,判四門深淺,如三藏中說。又約一一門,若說會四悉檀機,名之為妙;若乖四機,名之為麁。若於一一門十觀修行,句句得所,名之為妙;句句失所,名之為麁。麁故四邊火所燒,不得入清涼池;異此者名之為妙也。 別四門麁妙者,若論法相,有門附事故為麁,空門傍理故為妙;空門單理故為麁,亦空亦有門兩通故為妙;亦空亦有兩存故為麁,非空非有門兩捨故為妙。若約根緣則不如是,有門稱欲故為妙,三門不稱欲故為麁;有門是宜故為妙,三門非宜故為麁;有門對惡故為妙,三門非對故為麁;有門見第一義故為妙,三門不見第一義故為麁。餘三門亦如是。 又,識有門真善妙色之境者,名鎮頭迦;不識境故名迦羅迦。正發心故名鎮頭迦;不正發心名迦羅迦。安心定慧名鎮頭迦;不安二法名迦羅迦。破諸法遍名鎮頭迦;破法不遍名迦羅迦。善識通塞名鎮頭迦;不識通塞名迦羅迦。修三十七品名鎮頭迦;不修道品名迦羅迦。善解對治名鎮頭迦;不善對治名迦羅迦。善知次位名鎮頭迦;不識次位名迦羅迦。安忍不動名鎮頭迦;不能安忍名迦羅迦。無順道愛名鎮頭迦;順道愛起名迦羅迦。迦羅迦果則有九分,鎮頭迦果纔有一分。若十觀成就,則十分鎮頭,十觀皆妙。若九分迦羅,迦羅則麁;一分鎮頭,鎮頭則妙。疊華千斤,不如真金一兩,故約此判麁妙也。有門既爾,餘三門亦如是。 圓教四門者,則皆妙無麁。何者?有門為法界,攝一切法不可思議,即是一切法,況復三門!空門即是法界,攝一切法,況復三門!餘二亦如是,法相平等,無復優劣。若爾則無四門之異,但因順根機,赴緣四說,如四指指一月,月一指四。何者?此由眾生世世習此四門,因以成性,昔四門中推理,欲翻無明,即成慧根性。昔四門中修善,欲翻惡業,即成福德根性,福慧因緣,感今名、色、觸、受,各於本習而起愛取,是為十法,成圓性眾生。欲樂不同,宜治有異,佛智明鑒,照機無差。以世界悉檀赴四性欲,說此四門;以為人悉檀生四善;以對治悉檀治其四執;以第一義悉檀令四人見理。無此四緣,佛不說法。緣既不一,略言其四,皆是正直捨方便,但說無上道。門相圓融,四門皆妙。 〔T33 0792a11〕此就教門,更判麁妙。何者?若不得四悉檀意,諸論諍競,誰能融通?如地論有南北二道,加復攝大乘興,各自謂真,互相排斥,令墮負處,若不得意,四門俱失。但圓門融淨,教尚虛玄,銷釋經論,何競不息?若欲入道,何門不通?悟理之時,豈應存四?修行之時,豈應有塞?但四塞有輕重。別教門隔,悟者無乖,未悟成諍,其執大重,譬如鈍馬,痛手乃去。圓門虛玄,未悟之時,其執則輕,譬如快馬,見鞭影即去。如此輕執,若未得第一義益,不失三悉檀利。故論云:是四悉檀,皆實不虛。何者?世界故實,乃至見第一故實。雖俱是實,實有深淺,亦俱是虛。何者?如有門說世界悉檀,於樂欲是實,於餘則虛;有門生善為實,於餘則虛;有門破惡為實,於餘則虛;有門見第一義為實,於餘則虛。乃至三門亦如是。有門三悉檀於世界故實,於第一義則虛;一悉檀於第一義故實,於世界則虛;實故為妙,虛故為麁,廣作〔云云〕。 若以此麁妙約五味者,乳教有八門,四麁四妙,所通俱妙也。酪教四門為麁,理亦是麁。生蘇則十六門,十二門是麁,四門是妙;兩所通為麁,兩所通為妙。熟蘇有十二門,八門是麁;四門是妙。一理為麁,一理為妙。法華四門為妙,一理亦妙。諸聲聞人前來,門理俱麁,至此法華門理融妙。菩薩不定,或於方等般若門理融妙;極鈍者,同二乘也。涅槃有十六門,十二門麁,四門為妙,所通俱妙。何者?前來諸門,麁妙各通,猶存權理。涅槃不爾,一切諸法中,悉有安樂性,是諸眾生皆有佛性,無復權理,但一妙理,而更存麁門,為妙理方便,皆明入實。如梵志問云:因無常故,果云何常?佛反質答〔云云〕。故知如百川總海,諸門會實,實理要急,是故須融;接引鈍根,存麁方便。法華折伏破權門理,如金沙大河,無復迴曲。涅槃攝受,更許權門,各為因緣,存廢有異。然金沙百川,歸海不別〔云云〕。 四、開麁門顯妙門者。 問: 《中論》先明摩訶衍門,後明二乘門。今何意先明小門,後明大門? 答: 《中論》為時人見成病,先以大蕩,後示入真之門。今經無復見病,但住草庵,須開方便門,示圓實相,故先列小門,次明大門。開破適時,各有其美。 若法華後教,不俟更開,法華前教,或門、理已入妙者,更何所開?或門、理雖妙,而人未妙。門、理妙者,亦不須開;若門、若理、若人未妙者,今當開。謂開一切愛見、煩惱即是菩提,故云:「觀一切法空如實相。」開一切生死即是涅槃,故云:「世間相常住。」開一切凡人即是妙人,故云:「一切眾生皆是吾子。」開一切愛見言教即是佛法,故云:「若說俗間經書,治生產業,皆與實相不相違背。」開一切眾生即是妙理,故云:「為令眾生開佛知見,示、悟、入等,亦復如是。」開一切小乘法即是妙法,故云:「決了聲聞法,是諸經之王。」開一切聲聞教,故云:「佛昔於菩薩前毀訾聲聞,然佛實以大乘而見教化。」開一切聲聞行即是妙行,故云:「汝等所行是菩薩道。」開一切聲聞理即是妙理,故云:「開方便門,示真實相。」開諸菩薩未被妙者,今皆得圓,故云:「菩薩聞是法,疑網悉已除。」 別教有一種菩薩,三藏亦一種菩薩,通教一種菩薩,未決了者,今皆開顯。若門若理,無不入妙,是名開權顯實,決麁令妙也〔云云〕。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

一、為什麼要說入實相的門

第四,說明進入實相的門。實相幽微,義理深遠,好比要登上斷絕的深谷,必須借助飛梯;要契合真實的源頭,也必須依靠教法與修行,所以把教與行都稱為門。下文說:『從佛所教的門,可以走出三界之苦。』『佛弟子修道完成,來世便能成佛。』門這個名稱,意思正是能夠通達。

這一大段略分四方面:第一,簡略顯示門的形相;第二,顯示由門而入的觀法;第三,顯示各門的麁與妙;第四,顯示如何開麁而顯妙。

二、門相的總義

先顯示門相。佛法本來不是語言所能直接顯示的;佛隨順眾生因緣而說法,必用四句來詮說義理,使修行人由此通入真實之地。《大智度論》說:『對這樣的法,說第一義悉檀,也就是:一切都是真實,一切都不是真實,一切既真實也不真實,一切既非真實也非不真實。』這些都稱為諸法實相。實相尚且不能固定說成一,怎能說它有四?所以應當知道,四句只是進入實相的四種門。

論中又說四門都能進入清涼池。這表示門沒有阻礙,不只是利根的人能進,鈍根的人也能進;不只是心在定中的人能進;散心的人、專志的人、精進的人,也都能進。論中又說般若有四種形相,也就是有相、無相,乃至非有非無相。般若尚且不是固定的一相,怎麼會真有四相?應知這四相也只是進入般若的門。

論中又說:『般若波羅蜜好比大火焰,四邊都不可取著,因為邪見之火會燒人。』人若不去觸火,火便可以暖身、煮熟食物;若伸手觸火,火就會燒身。身已被燒,暖身煮食的功用也無從受用。四門本來是為了通達般若、除去煩惱、成辦大事;若對門生起取著,四門反而成為邪見,燒壞法身。法身既被燒壞,四門還能通向哪裡?所以,只要不取著火,門就仍能通達。

若把佛的教法稱為門,教法大略分成四類。每一類教法都用四句詮理,因此各有四門,四乘四便合成十六門。若把修行稱為門,領受教法而修觀,由思惟而悟入,便以行為門;若依教法而發真解,便以教為門。

有人初聞教法,就像快馬看見鞭影便進入正路,不必再經修觀;有人初修觀,就像夜間看見電光,當下見道,不必再聽教法。這兩類人都是過去善根薰習純熟:由教門通達的,稱為信行;由觀門通達的,稱為法行。若聽聞後沒有立即悟入,就應修觀;因修觀而悟,便轉成法行。若修觀而未悟,又須聽法;因聽法而悟,便轉稱信行。因此,教可以成為進入觀的門,觀也可以成為理解教的門;聞教之後起觀,以觀回頭聽教,教與觀彼此資助,才能成為通入實相的門。

若把教與觀合起來說,便有三十二門;這還只是說一個大數。仔細追尋,門其實無量。五百種身因、三十二不二門,善財童子遊歷法界,遇見無量善知識,聽聞無量教門,修行無量觀法;又如喜見城有一千二百門,實相法城怎會只有一條道路?經中說:『宣說種種法門,顯示通向佛道的道路。』

三、三藏教的四門

現在先依四類教法,說明十六門的形相。第一是三藏教四門。

第一,有門。生死諸法本來不是由世性、微塵或父母創造,而是由無明的正因緣法生起諸行,進而生起煩惱、業與苦;煩惱、業、苦三道,全都作為有而成立。一切有為法都是無常、苦、空、無我;依此可以生起煗法、頂法、世第一法,發起真實無漏之因,再用所得真解修道。這便是道諦,也仍就有而說。煩惱種子與果報二縛既斷,便得有餘涅槃、無餘涅槃。《大方等大集經》所引之意是:『甚深的道理不可言說,第一實義沒有聲音文字;陳如比丘對一切法,獲得了真實知見。』由滅因而會真,所會的真也就有而說。諸阿毘曇論所申明的正是這一路;由見有而得道,便稱有門。

第二,空門。依這一教法分析正因緣:從無明直到老死,屬苦、集二諦;三假浮虛,破除假與實的執取,全都歸入平等之空,由此發起真實無漏。因空而見真,空就是通往第一義的門。須菩提在石室中觀生滅無常而入空,因空得道,見佛法身。智者保留地說,這恐怕是《成實論》所申明的門。

第三,亦有亦空門。這一教法說正因緣生滅既有也空。領受這一教法,便能破除偏執有或偏執無的見解,看見因緣的有與空,發起真實無漏,因有無而見真;有無便成第一義之門。迦旃延由這一門入道,因此作《昆勒論》,仍以此論申明這一門。

第四,非有非無門。這一教法說正因緣生滅是非有非無之理。領受這一教法,便能破除落在有邊、無邊的邪執,看見因緣非有非無,發起真實無漏,因非有非無而見真;非有非無便成第一義之門。惡口車匿由此入道,尚未見到申明此門的論書。有人說犢子阿毘曇申明這個意思:該論說我在第五不可說藏中;我不屬於過去、現在、未來三世,所以不是有我;我也不是無為法,所以不是無我。智者認為這一說法恐怕還不能確定採用。

四、通教的四門

第二,說明通教四門。這是摩訶衍門,能通於通,也能通於別,不可偏取一邊。現在只就通於通的一面說四門。

前面三藏教四門都以滅色而入空,好比把一個實在的人頭分析成六個部分,再從各部分尋求人而終不可得,所以稱空。通教四門則都說色當體就是空,好比觀看鏡像,頭等六分當下就是空,不必等到分析窮盡才成為空。《大智度論》所引之意是:『佛告訴比丘:觀空就是疊,觀疊就是空。』這是體法之門不同於析法之門的地方。

三藏教先觀眾生空而得道,得道之後再觀法空,眾生與法兩種所觀境並不相融。通教門則眾生空就是法空,法空就是眾生空,二者沒有分別。《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》說,色的本性如我的本性,我的本性也如色的本性,二者都如幻化。

有人說,三藏教只是破除對實在自性的計執,從實法中求我而不可得,所以只是觀性空;大乘則明白相的自性本空,不須檢驗便已是空。這只是一時的概括說法。《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》說,諸法常常本性空,沒有任何時候不是本性空;應當通曉一切法如幻化、水月、鏡像,怎能只說相空而已?

就這個幻化之義,可以判出四門。論中說:『一切都是真實,一切都不真實,一切既真實也不真實,一切既非真實也非不真實。』佛依這四句廣說第一義悉檀。

第一句一切實,立為有門。無論業、果、善、惡,乃至涅槃,都是幻化;好比鏡中影像雖無實性,仍現出幻化的頭等六分,所以就此立有門。第二,諸法既然如幻化,幻化本來沒有實體;沒有實體,所以是空,乃至涅槃也如幻化。好比鏡中影像假現形色,尋求它卻不可得,這便是空門。

第三,諸法因如幻而稱有,幻又不可得而稱空;好比鏡中影像,看見卻不可得見,不可得見而又宛然可見,這就是亦空亦有門。第四,幻有尚且不可得,何況另執取一個幻空為可得?把有、空兩邊都捨去,便是第四門。這是通教即空的四門。

聲聞、緣覺、菩薩三乘共同領受這一教法,根性卻各不相同,各自由四句中的相應一句進入第一義,所以四句都稱為門。青目注《中論》說:『諸法實相有三種。』此處說三乘之人共同進入這一門而見第一義,正是即空這一種實相。

五、別教與圓教的門相

第三,說明別教四門。若依《中論》偈中『也稱為假名』來辨四門,便與《大智度論》的四句同具一意。

之所以稱別,是因為向下不同於三藏、通教,有七種差別;向上又不同於圓教,修行人須歷別次第而入中道,所以稱別。這個意思主要出自《大般涅槃經》,只是在經中多處散說。現在約乳等譬喻,顯示別教四門。

經文說佛性如乳中有酪、石中有金、力士額中有珠,這是有門。若說石中沒有金性、乳中沒有酪性,眾生佛性猶如虛空,大般涅槃空、迦毘羅城空,這是空門。經中又說佛性既有也無:為什麼說有?因為一切眾生全都有;為什麼說無?因為須由善巧方便才得見。又譬如乳中既有酪性,也沒有酪性,這是亦有亦無門。若說佛性就是中道,雙雙否定而遣除有無兩邊;又譬如乳中不是有酪性,也不是無酪性,這是非空非有門。

別教菩薩領受這四門教法,由此得見佛性、安住大涅槃,所以四句就是別教四門。這只是先用經文擬配別門;有時同樣文字也可能用作圓門,其義留待後面的料簡詳說。

圓教四門是進入佛性第一義的門。初看時,它和別教四門的名稱、義相相同;細究意趣,卻另有多重途徑。二者的同異,留待後文詳細分別。

六、諸門所通之處

第二大科,顯示入門之觀,分成兩部分:先簡略顯示門所通達之處,再簡略顯示由門而入的觀法。

先說門所通達之處。能通的教門大體有十六,所通之理卻只有偏真、圓真兩種。前八門同入偏真,後八門同入圓真。

為什麼偏真之理只有一個,能通的門卻有八個?三藏教四門路徑紆迴而窄陋,稱為拙度;通教四門是摩訶衍,路徑寬直,稱為巧度。巧與拙不同,所以能通之門分為八;真理沒有兩個,所通仍只是一個。好比一座州城在四面開門:四面的偏門譬喻三藏教,四面的直門譬喻通教。偏門、直門不同,所以能通有八;城中使君只有一位,所通之處也不是兩個。

別教四門偏而未融,圓教四門圓而能融。偏、圓不同,所以能通也分為八;圓真沒有兩個,所通仍只是一個。好比帝都四面開門:四面的偏門譬喻別教,四面的直門譬喻圓教。偏門、直門不同,能通共有八;帝王只有一位,所通之處也只是一個。

有人問:小乘只有一種四門,摩訶衍為什麼有三種四門?回答是:小乘淺近,在一生之中斷結,好比小戶人家。大乘深遠,通達之路漫長,好比大戶人家,需要千門萬戶;三組四門怎算得多?

又問:摩訶衍門怎麼會讓三種人同見真諦?回答是:這一門的本意是正通大乘,旁通小乘。好比王國有通門與別門,別門通向朝廷官士,通門也通向朝市;不能因平民百姓也從通門出入,就把它稱為平民之門。摩訶衍通門也是如此,正面通向實相,旁邊兼通真諦;三乘之人由此灰身斷智,只是兼由此門,不能因為它兼通偏真,便把它改稱小乘門。

七、三藏有門的十種觀法

其次,簡略顯示由門而入的觀法。先說三藏教有門之觀。有門中本來具備信行、法行兩類。聽聞教說便能悟入的人,心根迅疾銳利,他得道的方法很難明白展示給別人;所以這裡暫就法行人的觀門,分成十項:一、認識所觀境;二、真正發心;三、依循修習定慧;四、遍破一切法;五、善知何者通、何者塞;六、善用道品;七、善用對治;八、善知次位;九、善能安忍;十、不生法愛。

阿毘曇中具備這十層意思,只是文字散落各處。論師即使想要修道,若不知道依哪一條路修,就像迷在岔路,不知所從。現在撮取它的要義,使十項貫通修行始終,便可認識由有門入道的觀法。

一、認識所觀境

第一,要認識真正的無明因緣如何生起一切法。若說世間苦樂由毘紐天所生,或由世性、微塵所生,都是邪因緣生;若說一切自然如此,沒有任何作者,便是無因緣生。無因緣之說破壞原因,卻不破壞眼前結果;邪因緣之說也破壞正確的因果。這些都不是正因緣境,不應作為所觀。

數家保存鄰虛,論家破除鄰虛;這種有無之爭容易和邪因、無因之見混雜,恐怕並非正因緣境。為什麼?執鄰虛為有或為無,都沒有離開有無二見,仍是無明顛倒。由顛倒而有集,由集而感得麁色、細色等果報。無明顛倒本身既不真實,它所感得的苦果,怎能固定計執為有或無?所以《大智度論》所引之意是:『無論色是麁是細,總合觀察,都是無常、無我。』因為無我,所以沒有主宰。麁與細、因與緣、苦與集、依報與正報,都無常而無主,全由無明顛倒所造作;阿毘曇門對此有廣說。這便是認識正因緣的所觀境,不同於外道的邪因緣與無因緣。

二、真正發心

第二,真正發心。既已認識無明顛倒使行、識流轉,乃至老死不斷,好像旋轉的火輪,就應想止息煩惱與業,端正地求取涅槃,發起二乘之心,出離見惑、愛惑。這一發心不追求名聞利養,只求破除一切有,不再增長苦、集,唯一志向是無餘涅槃。此心清淨,不夾雜、不虛偽,才稱真正發心,不同於外道與天魔的發心。

三、依循修習定慧

第三,依循修習定慧。行者既立誓求出離,就依波羅提木叉戒而安住修道。然而罪障紛紛奔馳,心不能安定,又怎能成就道?因此修四念處,學五停心,破五種障。五停心的事相觀就是定,由定生起念處之慧;慧與定均勻平衡,所以稱為安心,也因定慧調適而稱停心。

沒有定慧、只有定或只有慧、定慧不能均勻調和,都不能稱為賢人。好比世間賢人要智德具足:智慧使他無事不明,德行使他美行無缺;許由、巢父才可稱賢。智慧多而德少,稱為狂人;德多而智少,稱為癡人;狂與癡都不是賢。賢也有賢能、賢善二義:善所以有德,能所以有智;智德具足,才稱賢人。修行人也是如此,修四念處之慧,學五停心之定,定慧必須具足。

數息時怎樣具足定慧?收攝一切散亂覺想,從一數到十,同時明知呼吸與數目都無常生滅,念念不停。觀不淨時,須深深厭離污穢惡相,又知能觀之心與所觀之境同樣無常生滅,迅速朽壞而虛誑,長久欺誑眾生。若由厭觀生起瞋恚,就須以慈心定相應;看見他人得樂,也要知道這一定心與對方的樂相都無常生滅。

觀因緣時,橫向觀察胎、卵、濕、化四生,全是因緣生法;縱向觀察欲、色、無色三界,也全是因緣生法。從緣而生的,都無常、無我。一切障礙生起時,就應念佛;念佛時也同樣具修定慧。這便是五停心都具足修習定慧。

有定,所以不狂;有慧,所以不愚。以此安心作一切修行的基礎,生起煗、頂,進入苦忍真明;因鄰近聖位而稱賢,意義正在這裡。外道不知鑽搖乳漿,連乳漿都難取得,何況進一步製成酪、蘇等物。

四、遍破一切法

第四,破法周遍而成就見有得道。安心修定慧之後,若在五停心後修共念處,就帶著不淨等觀,遍破諸法,事觀、理觀都能成就;若在五停心後單修性念處,就專一作理觀,以無常之慧遍破諸見。破見的觀法,如《中論》最後兩品所說。

佛最初轉法輪,不說其餘法,只說無常,就用無常遍破一切外道的有、無、亦有亦無、非有非無,以及神與世間是常、無常等六十二見,使其清淨。當時有阿毘曇師受人破斥說:無常是小乘,常是大乘;常能破無常,無常不能破常。若明白前文之意,便不會如此。

在得道以前,執著的心所計度的常、無常、亦常亦無常、非常非無常等,都是法塵對意根而生的見。見從緣生,從緣生的全都無常;外道所執的常、樂、我、淨從何成立?這四種顛倒全可用無常破除。所以五百比丘對達兜說:『只要修無常,就能得道,也能得神通。』又如六群比丘為人說法,一味只說無常。應知一切見解無論深淺,都被無常所破,這不同於舊醫只用乳藥一味治病。

五、善知通塞

第五,知道通與塞。前面雖已遍破諸見之過,卻還沒有顯示其中之德。過失就是塞,功德就是通。有見中的八十八使,乃至非有非無、不可說見中的八十八使,全都從因緣生,稱為塞;既是塞,就須破除。也要認識其中的通:有見中的道、滅二諦,乃至非有非無、不可說見中的道、滅二諦,同樣從因緣生,稱為通;既是通,又何須破除?

若不認識諸見,以為自己的見解是事實,其他說法都是妄語,執見便成為業,再由愛潤業而感果,這豈不是塞?若能在每一見中都知道它無常顛倒,不生計著;不執著就不造業,不造業就不受果。這樣通達,便有道諦與滅諦,豈不稱通?這和外道如蟲食木不同:蟲蝕木偶然成形,蟲自己卻不知道那是字還是非字。

六、善修道品

第六,不能只認識通塞,還須修習道品,向前推進各種法門。觀察有見乃至不可說見,都依色身而起,而色身污穢不淨,這是身念處。觀察有受乃至不可說受,都不離苦、樂、不苦不樂三受,而受的本質是苦,這是受念處。觀察諸見所起的想與行,全都無我,這是法念處。觀察生起諸見的心念念無常,這是心念處。

作這四種觀,便是在有為法中得到正確憶念;由此正念,四種顛倒被伏,稱為四念處。勤修四觀,稱四正勤;在定心中修習,稱四如意足;五種善根生起,稱五根;五根增長而遮止惡法,稱五力;定慧調和,稱七覺分;在安穩的道路中行進,稱八正道。這裡不是依階位排列道品,只就通修而總說三十七道品。用一種停心門即可修成三十七品,其餘停心門也是如此;阿毘曇道諦中有更廣分別。

這三十七品是行道之法,將行者帶到涅槃城前的三門。苦諦下的兩種行相,是空解脫門;集諦與道諦各有四行,加上苦諦下另兩行,是無作解脫門;滅諦下四行,是無相解脫門。涅槃門一開,行者便能進入。所以佛在《須跋陀羅經》中作決定師子吼:『只有我的法中有八正道;外道法中連一道尚且沒有,何況八道?』

七、善用對治

第七,善修對治。利根人修正道便能進入;若不能進入,就須修助道。所以論中說十二禪等都是幫助開門的方法。正慧力量弱時,遮障便會生起,須修助道作援助。論中所列是:『貪欲生起,教他修不淨觀、背捨等;對所緣不能自在,就教他修勝處;對所緣不能廣大普遍,就教他修一切處。福德少,就教他修無量心;想超出色界,就教他修四空定。』這些全是助道,為了幫助正道開門;不同於外道在根本禪中生起愛、見與慢。

八、善知次位

第八,善知次位。即使修了上述正行、助行,也不能立即自稱聖人,混淆真實與相似而不辨賢位、聖位。現在明白真實與相似的階位差別,知道自己尚非聖者,增上慢便不會生起。這不同於外道生戒取見、見取見,把生死之法誤計為涅槃。

九、善能安忍

第九,善修安忍。別相念處力量較弱,尚未通達暢利,便轉修總相念處;或總觀一項,或總觀兩項,乃至總觀四項。此時須能安忍,使諦觀成就,進入煗法,生起近似真道的煙相。《大般涅槃經》所引之意是:『煗法雖是有漏有為,卻能破壞有漏有為。』『我的弟子有,外道則沒有。』

能安忍,便成就頂法;頂法成就,名為到忍位的邊旁。若不能忍,就會退回這一邊,所以說頂法退失可造五逆,煗法退失可成闡提。正因如此,行者須善能安忍內外一切障礙,不同於外道不能忍受細微遮法。

十、法愛不生

第十,不生法愛。以上已生起煗、頂、忍、世第一四善根;若此時生法愛,雖不會退而造五逆或成闡提,卻不能進入見諦。於是三番收縮所觀,向前成就上忍,發起世第一法與苦忍真明,在十六剎那中成就初果,或者直接成就超越的果位;也可重用觀法,斷五下分結、五上分結,成為無學。

利根人運用觀法,可以節節進入;鈍根人運用觀法,就須完整經過十項。阿毘曇雖有廣說,始終不出這十意。

五百阿羅漢作《毘婆沙》,本是正面申明由有門得道,怎能只說有門是調心方便?四門只要調適得當,都能得道;四門若生取著,也全都不能得道。若只說見有能得道、見空不能得道,與外道有何差別?所以《大智度論》所引之意是:『若沒有般若的方便,就會墮在有、無兩邊。』現在以十法為方便,直接進入真門,永遠不同於外道;這便是由有門入真的觀法。

其餘空門、亦空亦有門、非空非有門,也各有從始至終入真的方便。它們和有門相比,各有不同;但都會入偏真,斷盡三界惑,在所證上沒有差別。其餘三門也應依有門準例各具十觀,大體相同而細節有異,此處不再繁記。

八、通教有門的十種觀法

其次說通教有門之觀,同樣依十項展開,十個名稱如前。第一,體解一切法全都如幻如化。第二,聲聞、緣覺、菩薩三種人所發的心大體相同,仍有小小差別。

有中論師說,這裡所說的是大乘聲聞;智者不同意。經中明明說:『想得聲聞、緣覺之果,應當學習般若。』論中也說:『聲聞與緣覺的解脫涅槃之道,全從般若而得。』經論沒有把他們說成那一種固定名稱,只是後代法師的錯說。

第三,雖知道定與慧都不可得,仍以定慧二法安心。第四,以如幻之慧遍破有、無、亦有亦無、非有非無四見,破六十二見及一切法。第五,知道幻化中的苦、集是塞,幻化中的道、滅是通。第六,以不可得之心修三十七道品。第七,以無所對治之心學一切對治。第八,清楚識別乾慧地乃至佛地。第九,幻化之慧不被外魔動搖,也不因內在障礙而退失。第十,諸法不生而般若生起,對所得法也不愛著。

十項成就,便能進入真諦;無論從智或斷說,都得無生法忍,比前面的析法門更為巧妙。通教有門的十觀可依此準知,不再詳細記述。其餘空、亦空亦有、非空非有三門也各具十項,大體相同、細節有異,同樣不再繁記。

九、別教有門的十種觀法

其次說別教有門之觀,也有十項。

第一,觀境。這一所觀境超出凡夫的四見、四門,也不是二乘四門之法,更不是通教四門之法。前述種種四門之法若作為境,都還不能稱實相,也不能固定說是生死或涅槃。只有如來藏才稱為妙有,其中有真實法。這一妙有是一切法的依持,一切法都從妙有出生;這便是別教有門的所觀境。

第二,發心。菩薩深入觀察實相妙有不被生死遷動,卻看見眾生好比金藏被雜草覆蓋、力士額中明珠在鬥爭中陷沒,又如貧窮孤兒流露在外,實在值得憐愍。菩薩為此生起大慈大悲,發四弘誓願。《思益梵天所問經》有三十二種大悲,《大方廣佛華嚴經》所引之意是:『不是只為一個人、一國或一界微塵數的人,而是為法界一切眾生發菩提心。』這樣的發心有大勢力,如同師子吼。

第三,安心。發心之後安住而向前修行,依前面所說種種定慧:在這一時節適合修這一種定,就修這一種定;在另一時節適合修這一種慧,就修這一種慧。以定愛護其心,以慧策勵前進,安住修道,只依止定慧二法,不另作依止,這就是安心法。

第四,破法遍。仍用妙有之慧遍破生死中的一切見,包含六十二見,不接受功德與黑闇等任何一邊;也遍破對涅槃的取著,不沉入空中而取證,好比大樹不讓怨鳥棲宿。

第五,識通塞。菩薩在每一法中清楚辨明通與塞,好比雪山中既有毒草,也有藥王。菩薩必須知道:這樣的心生起,屬六道苦、集,便是塞;那樣的心生起,屬二乘道、滅,便是通。再進一步,二乘苦、集是塞,菩薩道、滅是通;菩薩苦、集又是塞,佛道、滅才是通。在苦、集中能辨知非道,便通達佛道;也能知道執著佛道反會生起壅塞,層層明白而沒有滯礙,才叫識通塞。

第六,善修道品。三十七道品是菩薩的寶炬陀羅尼。四念處破顛倒,四正勤使修行精進,四如意足攝心入定,五善根生起而能排除五惡,定慧調適便在安穩的道路中行進。離開十種相,稱空三昧;連空相也不可見,稱無相三昧;不造作願求,稱無作三昧。這是行道之法,已接近涅槃之門。

第七,善修對治門。所觀察的對治成對列出:常與無常、恒與非恒、安與非安、為與無為、斷與不斷、涅槃與非涅槃、增上與非增上。菩薩常常觀察這些對治門,以助開實相。

第八,善知次位。從十信、十住、十行、十迴向、十地,到等覺、妙覺,對聖位深淺全都明白無誤,絕不自稱已冒居最高位。

第九,善能安忍。內在能忍善、惡兩種覺受,防備隨順與違逆兩種賊;外在能忍利、衰、毀、譽、稱、譏、苦、樂八風。由忍力之故,不被內外境界傾動。

第十,法愛不起。即使證得相似之法,也不讓法愛生起,因此不墮在菩薩頂位;若愛生起,就名為法愛。沒有這一愛,才進入菩薩正位,破除無明穢草,顯出妙有金藏,得見佛性,進入實相。這就是由別教有門修入實相之觀。

其餘空門、亦空亦有門、非空非有門的入實之觀,也各有十項。諸門方便雖然不同,卻共同會入圓真,所證之理沒有兩樣;三門觀法可依有門準知,不再詳細記述。

十、圓門與別門的十重簡別

其次說圓門入實之觀,先簡別圓門,再說圓觀。三藏門滅去所執實色而通真,若不得其意便多生諍論;通門體達幻色即空而通真,向人顯示無諍之法。別門先體達而滅生死色,再依次滅法性色而通中道,不得其意也多生諍論;圓門則說生死色當下就是法性色,也就在法性色上通達中道,向人顯示無諍之法。所以經文說『無上道』,又說『修行深妙之道』,意義正在這裡。

三藏、通教兩門不通中道,不須再加分別。別、圓兩類都通中道,二者同異大略分十重:一、融與不融;二、即法與不即法;三、佛智與非佛智;四、次第行與不次第行;五、斷斷惑與不斷斷惑;六、實位與非實位;七、果縱與果不縱;八、圓詮與不圓詮;九、從問答考察;十、從譬喻考察。細尋這十層意思,八門的同異便能明白。

一、融與不融

別教四門各有決定所據。有門所據是真善妙有,不關於空;空門所據是畢竟空,不關於有;亦有亦空、非空非有二門也各守自己當分。四門歷別,分別通達。若不得其意,把它取成固定形相,就像把妙有誤認為外道同性的實有,甚至幾乎混同冥初生覺之說。

前面三藏有門已把外道邪計先行破盡,空等三門所須破的邪見較少;通教巧門又破三藏拙門,別教門再破通門的近淺,早已不與二乘共,何況會和外道的冥初生覺混濫!妙有依如來藏而分判四門,怎能等同尼犍所計性實?好比周地璞玉與鄭地璞鼠同名為璞,實質卻不同,貴賤相隔如天。

當時有學地論的人反道還俗,暗取妙有之義而偷安於莊、老,把金石混雜,遂使邪正不分;眼盲昏暗的人再也不能辨別涇水、渭水。若真正明白諸四門的意思,精審簡別真偽,這種偷竊混淆就不會生起。別門雖作決定之說而可引生諍論,所說仍是諸佛境界,二乘尚且不知,怎能等同外道?

圓門則虛通融攝而微妙,不可固定執著。說有時不隔絕無,就在有上論無;說無時不隔絕有,就在無上論有。有無不二,沒有決定形相,只是假借有作言說的開端。這一有門當下也是其餘三門:一門即無量門,無量門即一門;不是固定的一,也不是固定的四;四就是一,一就是四。這便是圓門之相。

再從破與會來說融、不融。若只破外道邪見,不破二乘邪曲,也不破大乘方便,就是破得不圓。會得不圓,例如《維摩詰所說經》會反覆的凡夫,卻沒有會聲聞;會塵勞一類成如來種,入無為正位者反而不能回轉。生死惡人與煩惱惡法都被會入,二乘善法與四果聖人卻沒有被會入,這屬別門所攝。

般若中又說二乘所行的念處、道品都是摩訶衍,貪欲、無明、見愛等也都是摩訶衍;善法、惡法全被會入,卻沒有會惡人及二乘之人,也沒有明說他們作佛,這也屬別門所攝。

若是圓破,從別教以下都被判為方便。迦葉自破說:從此以前,我們都稱為邪見人。既稱邪見人,便沒有圓正道法,所以人與法都被破。別教人法尚且如此,何況草庵中的人法;二乘尚且如此,何況凡夫人法。圓破沒有任何固守保留之處。

若是圓會,則會一切執著於法的凡夫。經中對他們說:『你們全都應當成佛。』『我不敢輕慢你們。』五逆的調達也得到授記,龍女與畜生等也得到授記,何況二乘與菩薩。經中又說:『世間治生產業,全都不違背實相。』這是會一切惡法;又說:『你們所行的就是菩薩道。』析法二乘尚被會入,何況通教、別教;又說:『你是我的兒子,我就是父親。』沒有任何人、任何法不被會入,全都融成妙法,這是圓門所攝。

再從經文前後判圓與不圓。若先說不融門,表示地前;後來雖仍說不融門,卻說證得融,表示迴向位以後。或者先說證得融,表示迴向位以後;後來又說不融門,表示地前。這些都屬別門所攝。

若先說融門,所證也融,表示十信以後;後來說所證不融,表示十住以前。或者先說所證不融,表示十住以前;後來說所證融,表示十信以後。這些都屬圓門所攝。判讀不能只抓一個融字,還須看它在經文前後與行位中的位置。

二、即法與不即法

若別教有門說有,這個有不是生死之有,而是出離生死以外另說真善妙有;空門則出離二乘真諦以外另說畢竟空,亦有亦空、非有非無二門也各自如此,這是別教四門之相。

若圓教有門說有,就是生死之有當下為實相之有;一切法都趣向有,有就是法界,法界以外再無一法可論。生死就是涅槃,涅槃就是生死,二者無二無別。這只是舉有門作言說開端,其中實已具一切法,圓通而沒有障礙;其餘三門也都如此。這就是以生死現前之法為圓教四門。

即法又有遍與不遍,須依五住惑是否遍即來判圓、別,如前分別;即法、不即法若出現在經文前後,也須依前例分判圓、別。

三、佛智與非佛智

若有門分別一切智,了達空法;又分別道種智,照見恒河沙數佛法的種種差別,這是菩薩智,屬別教四門。若有門分別一切種智,五眼具足,圓照法界而正遍知,這是諸佛之智,屬圓教四門。

有時別門說圓智,圓門說別智;有時別門證圓智,圓門證別智。無論出現在前或後,都須如前例連同文脈分判別、圓,不能只憑智名判定。

四、次第行與不次第行

依別教有門修行,要漸次經歷階位差別,從微細到顯著,不能在一行中當下具無量行;其餘三門也同樣歷別,這是別教四門。

依圓教有門修行,一切法都趣向有門,一切行也都趣向有行;一行當下具無量行,稱為遍行。其餘三門也都如此,這是圓教四門。有時別門說圓行,圓門說別行;出現在前或後時,也須依前例分判。

五、斷斷與不斷斷

至理虛寂,無明體性本來不有,哪裡另須一個智慧?如果解與惑本不可得,又怎能固定安立圓、別?《大般涅槃經》所引之意是:『誰有智慧?誰有煩惱?』《維摩詰所說經》所引之意是:『婬欲、瞋怒、愚癡的本性就是解脫。』又說:『不斷癡愛而生起明脫。』從這一面說,便不作斷或不斷的固定議論。

《大般涅槃經》又說:『黑暗時沒有光明,光明時沒有黑暗;有智慧時,就沒有煩惱。』這一面則說用智慧斷煩惱。

別教有門多就固定分段而說,漸次斷除五住惑,這是可思議的智斷;其餘三門也同樣漸次,屬別教四門。圓教有門則說解與惑不二,多從不斷而斷說,五住全都不可思議,這是不可思議斷;其餘三門也同樣如此,屬圓教四門。有時圓門說斷,別門說不斷而斷;出現在前或後時,仍須依前例判別。

六、實位與非實位

別教有門說斷界內見惑、思惑,判為三十心位;斷界外見惑、思惑與無明,判為十地位;等覺最後一心斷盡無明;妙覺常住之果在一切繫累之外,再無所作。這其實是把別家的因位拿來作自家的果位,仍是方便,並非真實位;其餘三門大同小異,都屬別教四門。

圓教有門則從初發心起,以一心三觀斷界內惑,圓伏界外無明,判十信位;再進而發真智,圓斷界外見惑、思惑與無明,判四十心位;等覺最後一心使無明永盡,妙覺出離一切繫累,這才是究竟真實位。其餘三門也都如此,屬圓教四門。有時別門說實位,圓門說不實位;有時別門證實位,圓門證不實位。無論出現在前後哪裡,都依文脈分別。

七、果縱與果不縱

別教有門從門證果,法身、般若、解脫三德形成縱橫次第:法身本有,般若由修行成就,解脫到最後才圓滿。不只果德有縱列,因行也有局限。地論師說,初地具足檀波羅蜜,其他波羅蜜不是全然不修,只是隨力隨分;檀波羅蜜只在初地圓滿,不通上地。其餘諸法只是部分有而不能具足,這一義仍有未盡;其餘三門也同樣如此,屬別教四門。

圓教有門從門證果,三德具足,不是縱列,也不是橫排;因行也同樣是一法門具足一切法門,一直通到佛地。《大方廣佛華嚴經》所引之意是:『從最初一地就具足一切地的功德。』《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》所引之意是:『最初阿字具足其餘四十一字的功德。』其餘三門也都如此,屬圓教四門。有時別門說果不縱,圓門說果縱;出現在前後時,仍依前例判別。

八、圓詮與不圓詮

別教有門的門相不圓融,或只融一門,或只融兩門。門前的開章只作偏側的引導;門中的正文詮述不融、不即、菩薩智,乃至使用偏側的譬喻;門後的結文又收回不融、不即等義。其餘三門也同樣如此,屬別教四門。

圓教有門則一門當下就是其餘三門。門前以圓意引導;門中詮述融、即、佛智,乃至使用圓融譬喻;門後又結成融、即等義。其餘三門也同樣如此,屬圓教四門。有時別門用圓詮,圓門用別詮;出現在前後時,仍依前例分判。

九、由問答核定

若有門所明之義尚未辨明屬圓或屬別,就須追尋文中的問答,反覆核實徵驗,自會看出它的圓、別指趣。其餘三門也同樣由問答判讀。

十、由譬喻核定

諸門前後有時用金、銀、寶物作譬,有時用如意珠、日、月作譬;有的以別義作合,有的以圓義作合。沿譬與法如何相合,圓、別之相自然顯明。

用這十重意思玄覽眾經,圓、別兩種門便朗然可見。

十一、今經十義與圓教四門

再依五味分別四門多少:乳教有兩種四門,酪教有一種四門,生蘇教有四種四門,熟蘇教有三種四門,今經只有一種四門。

今經中可見前述十義。經說『觀一切法空,如實相』,又說決了聲聞法、是諸經之王,並說開方便門,這是融通凡夫、小乘、大乘的人與法。經說『一切世間的治生產業,全都不違背實相』,顯示從前的客作人就是長者之子,這是即法之義。

經說開、示、悟、入佛之知見,又說現在所應作的唯有佛智慧,這是佛慧。經說著如來衣,以及座、室等,這是不次第行;也說不斷五欲而使諸根清淨。經說『又越過五百由旬』,這是不斷而斷之義。

五品、六根清淨,以及乘寶乘而遊四方,是實位。佛自己安住大乘,以定慧之力莊嚴,並用它度眾生,是果不縱。合掌以恭敬心,想聽完整的道,是今佛經文之前的圓詮;諸法實相之義已為你們說,是古佛經文之後的圓詮。智積與龍女的問答顯示圓義;輪王頂珠與高廣寶車,都是圓教譬喻。這十層意義具足,圓門便已明白。

現在再說圓融四門的四相。經說佛的智慧微妙第一,又說佛以如來智慧觀察久遠之事,猶如今天;智慧照知妙法,這是有門。一切法空,常住寂滅之相,最後歸空,這是空門。諸法常無自性,佛種從因緣生起,這是亦空亦有門。既非如也非異,既非虛也非實,雙雙否定而捨離兩邊,這是非空非有門。

以四相標示門,以十義簡別圓、別,由此可知今經明說圓教四門。

十二、圓教有門的十種觀法

前面已經知道圓教四門,現在依有門修觀,觀法同樣分成十項。

一、不可思議境

相對於前面十二種可思議之門,這裡的所觀稱不可思議境。不可思議境就是一實四諦。

生死苦諦不可思議,當下即空、即假、即中。即空,所以稱方便淨;即假,所以稱圓淨;即中,所以稱性淨。三種淨在一心中得到,稱大涅槃。《維摩詰所說經》所引之意是:『一切眾生就是大涅槃。』所以稱不可思議四諦。既是一切眾生本即大涅槃,就不能再滅一次;現前生死苦諦便是無作滅諦,也同時是集諦、道諦。

煩惱集諦也不可思議,同樣即空、即假、即中。即空,所以稱一切智;即假,所以稱道種智;即中,所以稱一切種智。三智在一心中得到,稱大般若。《維摩詰所說經》所引之意是:『一切眾生就是菩提之相,不能再另外取得。』現前煩惱集諦便是無作道諦,也同時是苦諦、滅諦,所以稱不可思議的一實四諦。

這也是真、善、妙色。生死即空,所以稱真;生死即假,所以稱善;生死即中,所以稱妙。這便是圓教有門的不可思議境。

二、真正發心

一切眾生本即大涅槃,為什麼仍在顛倒中把本樂認作苦?菩薩由此生起大悲,發兩誓願:使未度者得度,使未斷者得斷。一切煩惱本即菩提,為什麼眾生仍在愚闇中把正道當成非道?菩薩由此生起大慈,又發兩誓願:使未知者得知,使未得者得證。

這是無緣慈悲與清淨誓願。慈善根的力量自然吸取一切眾生,不捨任何人。

三、定慧安心

既已體解實相,發心也已具足,怎能只是站在池邊看魚,卻不肯結網?又怎能已包好糧食、綁好腳程,卻仍安坐不行?前一譬說明已知所觀妙境就須起行,後一譬說明既發弘誓就須前進,兩層都不能停在準備。

修行的要點不出定慧。好比陰陽調適,萬物才能秀發結果;雨旱失去節度,只會焦枯腐爛,怎能生長?又如車子兩輪均勻,才能運載;鳥的雙翼具足,才能飛升。體達生死就是涅槃,稱為定;通達煩惱就是菩提,稱為慧。在一心中善巧修定慧,便具足一切行。

四、遍破一切法

用這一妙慧,好比金剛斧,碰到什麼都能斬碎;又如沒有翳障的太陽,照到哪裡都明朗。若生死就是涅槃,分段生死、變易生死等苦諦全被破除;若煩惱就是菩提,四住惑、五住惑等集諦全被破除。雖說能破,實無固定的所破,因為生死當下就是涅槃。

五、善識通塞

識通塞好比掌管軍隊的寶臣,取捨合宜:對強者制止使之退,對弱者安撫使之進。知道生死的過患,稱為塞;知道生死即涅槃,稱為通。煩惱能惱亂,稱為塞;知道煩惱就是菩提,稱為通。

從外道四見一直到圓教四門,行者都要識別通塞;每一節若起執著,就是塞,每一節若使執著亡去、顯出妙理,就稱為通。若不能辨識諸法道路的平坦與險阻,不但行法不能前進,還會丟失隨身重寶。

六、善識道品

觀生死就是涅槃,便見十界生死的色陰全都非淨、非不淨,乃至識陰全都非常、非不常;這能破常、樂、我、淨與無常、苦、無我、不淨八種顛倒,就是法性四念處。四念處中具足一切道品、三解脫門與一切法。

又知道涅槃就是生死,顯四棵枯樹;知道生死就是涅槃,顯四棵榮樹;知道生死、涅槃不二,就是一實諦,既非枯也非榮,安住大涅槃。枯、榮與非枯非榮三層,共同顯示道品之義。

七、善修對治

正道若多受障礙,就須修助道。觀生死就是涅槃,用來對治報障;觀煩惱就是菩提,用來對治業障與煩惱障。

八、善知次位

生死之法本即涅槃,稱理即涅槃;理解生死即涅槃,稱名字涅槃;勤觀生死即涅槃,稱觀行涅槃;善根功德生起,稱相似涅槃;真實智慧生起,稱分真涅槃;窮盡生死底,稱究竟涅槃。觀煩惱即菩提,也同樣依理即、名字、觀行、相似、分真、究竟六層而說。

九、善能安忍

行者要能安忍內外強、軟的遮障,不讓觀心被破壞。觀生死即涅槃時,不被陰、入、境、病患、業、魔、禪、二乘、菩薩等境界動搖破壞;觀煩惱即菩提時,不被諸見與增上慢境動搖破壞。

十、無法愛

越過一切障難,道根成立,各種功德便生起。觀生死即涅槃,所以各種禪定、三昧功德生起;觀煩惱即菩提,所以陀羅尼、無畏、不共法與種種般若生起;觀生死、涅槃不二,所以法身實相生起。

相似功德順理而生時,心容易對順道之法生愛,這便稱法愛。法愛使人不能再向上,也沒有立即退下,稱為頂墮。法愛一生,就須迅速滅除;法愛滅後,才能破無明,開佛知見,證實相體。

觀生死即涅槃,所以證得解脫;觀煩惱即菩提,所以證得般若;知道二者不二,所以證得法身。一身即無量身,如無上寶聚、圓滿如意珠,一切法全都具足。這就稱由有門入實,證得經體;其餘三門也同樣具足十觀而入實。

十三、今經散文具足十觀

這十種觀,在今經文字中全都具足。經說:『此法不可顯示,言辭之相寂滅,其餘眾生沒有能夠理解的。』又說:『我的法微妙而難以思議。』這是不思議境。

對一切眾生生大慈心,對還不是菩薩的人生大悲心;經說:『我得三菩提時,以神通力、智慧力引導他們,使他們安住在此法中。』這是真正發心。經又說佛自己安住大乘,依所得法,以定慧力莊嚴;這是安住定慧二法,既成就自己,也成就他人。

佛作破有法王,是破法遍。又如日月光明能除一切幽暗,經說:『此人行於世間,能破眾生黑暗。』這也是破法遍。經說:『有一位導師,帶領眾人;他的心明了而決定,在險難中救濟眾人。』這是善知通塞。

淨藏、淨眼善修三十七道品與諸波羅蜜,合攝道品、對治兩項。增長道而損減生,遊於四方,是善識次位。安住不動如須彌山頂,並著如來衣,是安忍。雖聽見各種聲音而不執著,眼耳鼻舌身意六根都清淨如此,又說真淨大法,這是無法愛。

十觀的證文散在全經,人們往往沒有看見。現在把它們撮聚為十項,放入有門作觀;其餘三門也大體相同、細處有異,同樣以十觀入實。

而且,這十觀的意思不只出在今經;大小乘經論都具備。好比摩黎山只出產栴檀,這一法門確實不是外道四韋陀典籍,也不是中土莊子、老子所載。世人都共同講讀經論,面對文字卻不能認出十觀;若想學道,便全無方便,實在可悲。

這好比只知道擠乳,卻不懂鑽搖而製成酪蘇。若認識十意,在小乘四門都可用它入真,在大乘四門都可用它入實;既已入實,就像吃過乳糜,再無別的需求。得到半如意珠或全如意珠,本想布施一切眾生;可是眾生不肯輕生重道、勤心修習,不肯接受也不肯使用,白白布施又有什麼利益?智者為此自說悔恨;即使眼前沒有利益,仍可作毒鼓之因。若想完整知道十觀,應到《摩訶止觀》中詳看。

十四、從能通與所通判麁妙

第三大科,說明諸門的麁與妙,分兩部分:第一,就能通與所通判麁妙;第二,依諸門自身判麁妙。

能、所可成四句。門是能通,理是所通:有能通麁、所通也麁;有能通妙、所通卻麁;有能通麁、所通卻妙;也有能通妙、所通也妙。

三藏教四門扶助事相而淺近,所以能通為麁;它只詮偏真,所通也麁。通教四門是大乘體法,如實而以巧度通達,所以能通為妙;三乘卻各證偏真,所通仍麁。別教四門屬教道方便,所以能通為麁;它詮說進入圓真,所通為妙。圓教四門是證道實說,所以能通為妙;即現前事而圓,所通也妙。

再依四味說:生蘇教的能通、所通都帶麁;乳教的能通、所通都不帶麁;熟蘇教是所通帶麁、能通不帶麁;圓教接通、接別之門,以及涅槃中的諸門,則是能通帶麁、所通不帶麁。

十五、『一門而復狹小』的問答

有人問:經中說『只有一門,而且狹小』,是因為麁才稱一小,還是因為妙才稱一小?

回答是:這一義應當通用,不能局限在一種門。三藏教四門因對應根機而有不同說法,所以稱四;同是佛教,所以稱一。每一門的方便不同,所以稱四;共同朝向涅槃,所以稱一。所通隨能通而分,所以稱四;能通會入所通,所以稱一。文字中沒有菩提,是就教說狹小;好比窄路不能容兩人並行,是就行說狹小;教、行兩門要取得真諦而難以契合,是就理說狹小。

通教也是如此。對應不同因緣而分說,所以有四;同是佛教,所以是一。觀法不同,所以有四;共同朝向無生,所以是一。所隨能通而分,所以有四;能隨所通而會,所以是一。通教即事而真,文字中已有菩提;善、惡都觀為不可得,也能並行。因此通教不從教與行這兩面說狹小,只因教觀要取得真理而難以契合,所以說理狹小。

別教四門也一樣。為四種根機而說,所以有四;同是佛教,所以是一。入實之觀不同,所以有四;共同朝向一實,所以是一。所通隨能通而分,所以有四;能通會入所通,所以是一。不能當下說生死就是涅槃,所以教狹小;不能當下說煩惱就是菩提,所以行狹小;教、行要取得實理而難以契合,所以理狹小。

圓教四門也一樣。對應四種根機,所以有四;全是佛說,所以是一。入實之觀不同,所以有四;四觀共同朝向實相,所以是一。把門的名稱安在理上,所以有四;以理回應諸門,所以是一。這一教當下說生死就是涅槃,所以教不狹小;當下說煩惱就是菩提,所以行不狹小。然而教觀要取得實理仍難以契合,所以理仍稱狹小。

依經文『只有一門,而且狹小』來說,正是說教、行之門若取理不當,便稱狹小。現在把這一句拓展開來,在每一處都有不同含義,怎能固定執著一段文字?明白這一意,麁妙自然清楚。

十六、依四教諸門判麁妙

第二,依諸門判麁妙。

三藏教四門

三藏教四門全是能通;若執著其中任何一門,四門全都壅塞。從成與壞說麁妙,本來沒有固定優劣,不能偏判。

若只從門法本身說,有門依附俗諦,入道較拙;空門靠近真諦,入道較巧。所以《大智度論》所引之意是:『為鈍根人說眾生空,為利根人說法空。』亦有亦無門相對前兩門較巧,相對後一門仍拙;非有非無門則較巧。論中又說:『半有半無的人,稱為鈍人。』這是依四門之法判麁妙。

若依根性是否適宜說,根性適合有門,有門便成,其餘三門便壞;適合空門,空門便成,其餘三門便壞;適合亦有亦無門或非有非無門時,也各依此判成壞。

若就一門能否具足四悉檀說,四悉檀全得便稱成,失去四悉檀便稱壞。仍在同一門中,能隨順欲樂是得,違背心情是失;正合所宜是得,不合所宜是失;能治病是得,不能治病是失;能見第一義是得,不能見第一義是失。門門相傳都有成壞,麁妙便依此而論。

再依十觀判麁妙:所觀因緣境正確是得,境界邪僻是失;真正發心是得,發心不真是失;安心合宜是得,定慧不調是失;破法周遍是得,破得不遍是失;知道通塞是得,不知通塞是失;乃至順道法愛不生是得,順道法愛生起是失。若一門十法成就,這一門便妙,其餘門便麁;若其餘門十法成就而這一門不成就,這一門便麁,其餘門便妙。

通教四門

通教所通之理只有一個;這一理不可言說,怎能另外比較形相麁妙?但就佛對機說門,仍不無優劣,四門深淺可如三藏教所說。

再依每一門判:所說能會四悉檀根機,稱妙;違背四種根機,稱麁。每一門的十觀若句句修得其所,稱妙;句句失去其所,稱麁。麁時就被般若四邊之火焚燒,不能進入清涼池;與此相反,便稱妙。

別教四門

若只論法相,有門附事,所以較麁;空門靠近理,所以較妙。空門只守單一之理,所以又麁;亦空亦有門通達兩邊,所以較妙。亦空亦有門仍保存兩邊,所以又麁;非空非有門兩邊皆捨,所以較妙。

若依根緣,就不能這樣固定排列。眾生欲樂與有門相稱,有門便妙,其餘三門不稱欲,便麁;有門正合所宜,便妙,其餘三門不合所宜,便麁;有門能對治其惡,便妙,其餘三門不能對治,便麁;有門使他見第一義,便妙,其餘三門不能使他見第一義,便麁。空、亦空亦有、非空非有三門,也都各依自己的欲樂、所宜、對治、第一義而作同樣判斷。

再依十觀,用鎮頭迦甘果、迦羅迦毒果作譬。能認識有門真善妙色之境,稱鎮頭迦;不識境,稱迦羅迦。真正發心,稱鎮頭迦;發心不正,稱迦羅迦。定慧安心,稱鎮頭迦;不能安住二法,稱迦羅迦。遍破諸法,稱鎮頭迦;破法不遍,稱迦羅迦。善識通塞,稱鎮頭迦;不識通塞,稱迦羅迦。

修三十七道品,稱鎮頭迦;不修道品,稱迦羅迦。善解對治,稱鎮頭迦;不善對治,稱迦羅迦。善知次位,稱鎮頭迦;不識次位,稱迦羅迦。安忍不動,稱鎮頭迦;不能安忍,稱迦羅迦。沒有順道法愛,稱鎮頭迦;順道法愛生起,稱迦羅迦。

本論說迦羅迦果有九分,鎮頭迦果只有一分。若十觀全都成就,就是十分鎮頭迦,十觀全妙;若九分是迦羅迦,迦羅迦便麁;一分是鎮頭迦,鎮頭迦便妙。千斤疊華比不上一兩真金,所以可依此判麁妙。有門如此,其餘三門也同樣依十觀成失判斷。

圓教四門

圓教四門全都妙而無麁。有門就是法界,攝一切不可思議法,當下就是一切法,何況其餘三門;空門也是法界,攝一切法,何況其餘三門;亦空亦有、非空非有二門也都如此。法相平等,不再有固定優劣。

若四門平等,為什麼還有四門之別?只因隨順眾生根機,佛才應緣作四種說法,好比四根手指指向一輪月:月只有一,指卻有四。

眾生生生世世薰習這四門,由此形成根性。過去在四門中推求義理,想翻轉無明,便成智慧根性;過去在四門中修善,想翻轉惡業,便成福德根性。福慧因緣感得現在的名、色、觸、受,又各依本來薰習生起愛、取;由此十法,成為具圓教根性的眾生。

眾生欲樂不同,所宜與所治也有差異;佛智明白鑒照,觀機沒有差錯。佛以世界悉檀對應四種性欲而說四門,以為人悉檀生起四種善,以對治悉檀治四種執,以第一義悉檀使四種人見理。沒有這四種因緣,佛就不說相應之法;因緣並非一種,所以略說為四。四門全是正直捨方便、但說無上道,門相圓融,因此四門都妙。

再就教門進一步判麁妙。若不明白四悉檀之意,各論彼此諍競,誰能融通?例如地論有南北二道之爭,後來又有攝大乘之說興起,各自認為自己真實,彼此排斥,使對方落在敗處。不得四悉檀意,四門全都失敗。

圓門雖融淨,教說又虛通玄遠;若不能用它消解經論,諍競為何仍不止息?若真想入道,有哪一門不能通?悟理時,哪裡還應保存四門之執?修行時,哪裡應讓任何一門壅塞?只是四種壅塞仍有輕重。

別教門彼此隔別,已悟者不會違乖,未悟者容易諍競,執著很重,好比鈍馬須被重手打痛才肯前進。圓門虛通玄妙,未悟時執著較輕,好比快馬看見鞭影便走。如此輕執,即使還沒有得到第一義的利益,也不失世界、為人、對治三悉檀的利益。所以論中說四悉檀全都真實而不虛。

為什麼都真實?世界悉檀在世界因緣中真實,乃至第一義悉檀在見第一義時真實。雖然都真實,真實仍有深淺;從另一面說,它們也都可能虛。以有門為例,世界悉檀對相應欲樂是真,對其他欲樂便虛;為人悉檀能使相應者生善是真,對其他情形便虛;對治悉檀能破相應之惡是真,對其他病便虛;第一義悉檀能令相應者見理是真,對其他作用便虛。其餘三門也都如此。

有門中的世界、為人、對治三悉檀,對世間施設是真,對第一義便虛;第一義悉檀對第一義是真,對世間施設便虛。真實的一面稱妙,虛的一面稱麁;其餘門可依此廣作分別。

十七、依五味判麁妙

若把上述麁妙放到五味中說,乳教有八門,其中四門麁、四門妙,所通之理全都妙。酪教有四門,門麁,所通之理也麁。生蘇教有十六門,其中十二門麁、四門妙;兩種所通之理麁,兩種所通之理妙。熟蘇教有十二門,其中八門麁、四門妙;一種所通之理麁,一種所通之理妙。法華只有四門,四門全妙,所通一理也妙。

聲聞人在法華以前,能通之門與所通之理都麁;到了法華,門與理都融而成妙。菩薩則不一定,有的已在方等、般若時使門理融妙;最鈍根者仍和二乘相同,到法華才融妙。

涅槃有十六門,其中十二門麁、四門妙,所通之理全都妙。為什麼?此前諸門各以麁門、妙門通向相應麁理、妙理,還保存方便之理。涅槃則說一切法中都有安樂之性,一切眾生都有佛性,不再另存方便之理,只有一種妙理;但為了給妙理作方便,仍保存麁門,並說所有門都能入實。

好比梵志問佛:如果因是無常,果為什麼是常?佛反過來詰問而作答。由此可知,百川最後全入大海,諸門都會入實。實理最為要緊,所以必須融通;但為接引鈍根,仍保留麁方便。

法華用折伏之法破除方便門與方便理,好比金沙大河,再沒有迴曲。涅槃則以攝受之法重新允許方便門,各依不同因緣接引。保存或廢除的施設雖異,金沙大河與百川最後同歸大海,所歸的實理沒有差別。

十八、開麁門而顯妙門

第四大科,開麁門而顯妙門。

有人問:《中論》先說摩訶衍門,後說二乘門;本論為什麼先說小乘門,後說大乘門?

回答是:《中論》為當時人的見病而說,所以先用大乘空義掃蕩諸見,再顯示聲聞入真的門。今經面對的眾生已不再有那一見病,只是安住草庵,不肯前進;因此必須開方便門,顯示圓融實相,所以先列小門,再明大門。開破都須適應時機,兩種次序各有其美。

法華以後的教法,不等待再開;法華以前的教法中,若門、理已入妙,又有什麼可開?有時門、理雖妙,人卻還未妙;門、理本身既妙,也不須再開。凡是門、理或人尚未妙的,現在才是所開的對象。

開一切愛見、煩惱,使它們顯為菩提,所以經說:『觀一切法空,如實相。』開一切生死,使它顯為涅槃,所以說:『世間之相常住。』開一切凡夫,使凡夫顯為妙人,所以說:『一切眾生全是我的兒子。』

開一切愛見言教,使它顯為佛法,所以說:『即使說世俗經書與治生產業,也全都不違背實相。』開一切眾生,使眾生顯為妙理,所以說:『為使眾生開佛知見,示、悟、入也是如此。』

開一切小乘法,使它顯為妙法,所以說:『決了聲聞法,是諸經之王。』開一切聲聞教,所以說:『佛過去曾在菩薩面前毀訾聲聞,然而佛其實用大乘加以教化。』開一切聲聞行,使它顯為妙行,所以說:『你們所行的就是菩薩道。』開一切聲聞理,使它顯為妙理,所以說:『開方便門,顯示真實相。』

再開一切尚未被妙法圓滿的菩薩,使他們現在全都得圓,所以說:『菩薩聽聞此法,疑網全已除去。』別教有一類菩薩,三藏教有一類菩薩,通教也有一類菩薩;凡是過去尚未決了的,現在全都得到開顯。

如此一來,無論門或理,沒有一項不入妙。這就稱為開權顯實,決斷一切麁而使之成妙。

1. Why Speak of Gateways into the True Mark?

Fourth is the clarification of gateways into the true mark. The true mark is subtle and hidden, its meaning profound and far-reaching. It is like trying to climb an impassable ravine: one must rely on a flying ladder. To accord with the true source, one must likewise rely on teaching and practice, and so both teaching and practice are called gateways. A later passage says, “Through the gateway of the Buddha’s teaching one can leave the suffering of the three realms.” It also says, “After the Buddha’s disciples have completed practice of the path, in a future life they will attain buddhahood.” The name “gateway” means precisely that which can give access.

This long section is divided briefly into four aspects: first, briefly showing the characteristics of the gateways; second, showing the contemplations through which one enters a gateway; third, showing which gateways are coarse and which wondrous; and fourth, showing how the coarse is opened to reveal the wondrous.

2. The General Meaning of Gateway Characteristics

First, the characteristics of the gateways are shown. The Buddha-Dharma cannot originally be disclosed directly through language. Yet when the Buddha teaches in accord with sentient beings’ conditions, he must use four propositions to express principle, enabling practitioners to enter the ground of reality through them. The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom says in meaning: “Concerning such a Dharma, the siddhānta of ultimate meaning is taught, namely: everything is real; everything is unreal; everything is both real and unreal; everything is neither real nor unreal.” All of these are called the true mark of dharmas. The true mark cannot even be fixed as one, so how could it really be four? One should therefore understand that the four propositions are only four gateways into the true mark.

The treatise also says that all four gateways enter the cooling pool. This means the gateways are unobstructed. Not only people of sharp faculties can enter; people of dull faculties can enter as well. Not only those whose minds are concentrated can enter; those with scattered minds, those intent on a single purpose, and those diligent in effort can all enter through a gateway. The treatise further says that prajñā has four kinds of characteristic: the characteristic of existence, the characteristic of nonexistence, and so forth through the characteristic of neither existence nor nonexistence. Prajñā itself is not fixed as one characteristic, so how could it truly have four? These four characteristics should likewise be understood only as gateways into prajñā.

The treatise further says: “Prajñāpāramitā is like a great blaze. None of its four sides can be grasped, because the fire of wrong views will burn one.” If people do not touch the fire, it can warm their bodies and cook their food. If they reach out and touch it, it burns them. Once the body has been burned, the functions of warming the body and cooking food can no longer be received. The four gateways originally serve to give access to prajñā, remove afflictions, and accomplish the great matter. If one becomes attached to a gateway, however, the four gateways instead become wrong views and burn the Dharma-body. Once the Dharma-body has been burned, what could the four gateways still access? Thus, so long as one does not grasp the fire, the gateway continues to give access.

If the Buddha’s teaching is called a gateway, teachings are divided briefly into four kinds. Each kind of teaching expresses principle through four propositions and therefore has four gateways; four times four produces sixteen gateways. If practice is called a gateway, one receives the teaching, cultivates contemplation, and enters through reflection, taking practice as the gateway. If one relies on teaching and gives rise to true understanding, teaching is the gateway.

Some people first hear the teaching and, like a swift horse seeing the shadow of a whip, immediately enter the right road without needing further cultivation of contemplation. Others begin by cultivating contemplation and, like seeing lightning in the night, immediately see the path without needing to hear more teaching. Both kinds have matured wholesome roots through cultivation in the past. Those who gain access through a gateway of teaching are called practitioners through faith; those who gain access through a gateway of contemplation are called practitioners through Dharma. If someone does not immediately awaken after hearing, that person should cultivate contemplation; awakening through contemplation turns that person into a practitioner through Dharma. If someone cultivates contemplation without awakening, that person must hear the Dharma again; awakening through hearing turns that person into a practitioner through faith. Teaching can therefore become the gateway into contemplation, and contemplation can in turn become a gateway for understanding teaching. One contemplates after hearing the teaching and listens to teaching again through contemplation. Only when teaching and contemplation mutually support one another do they become gateways giving access to the true mark.

When teaching and contemplation are discussed together, there are thirty-two gateways; this is still only a large round number. Examined closely, gateways are actually immeasurable. There are five hundred causes of embodiment and thirty-two gateways of nonduality. Sudhana travels through the Dharma realm, meets immeasurable spiritual advisers, hears immeasurable gateways of teaching, and cultivates immeasurable contemplative practices. The city Joyful to Behold has twelve hundred gateways; how could the Dharma-city of the true mark have only one road? The sutra says, “They teach various Dharma-gateways and reveal the road to the Buddha-path.”

3. The Four Gateways of the Tripiṭaka Teaching

The sixteen gateways are now explained according to the four teachings. First come the four gateways of the Tripiṭaka Teaching.

First is the gateway of existence. The dharmas of birth-and-death are not created by a primordial nature of the world, atoms, or parents. They arise through ignorance as right causes and conditions, which gives rise to formations and in turn to afflictions, karma, and suffering. All three paths—afflictions, karma, and suffering—are established as existent. All conditioned dharmas are impermanent, suffering, empty, and without self. Through this one can give rise to warmth, summit, and the foremost worldly dharma, arouse the true uncontaminated cause, and then use the true understanding attained to cultivate the path. This is the truth of the path, and it too is discussed as existent. Once the two bonds of the seeds of affliction and their results have been severed, one attains nirvāṇa with remainder and nirvāṇa without remainder. The meaning cited from the Great Vaipulya Collection Sūtra is: “The profound principle cannot be spoken; the first real meaning has neither sound nor graph. The monk Chenru attained true knowledge and vision concerning all dharmas.” Through the cessation of the cause one converges upon truth, and the truth converged upon is also discussed as existent. This is the route upheld by the Abhidharma treatises; seeing existence and thereby attaining the path is called the gateway of existence.

Second is the gateway of emptiness. According to this teaching, right dependent origination is analyzed: from ignorance through aging-and-death belongs to the truths of suffering and accumulation. The three provisional constructions are floating and unreal; grasping at both the provisional and the real is broken, and all enters the equality of emptiness, from which the true uncontaminated is aroused. Through emptiness one sees truth, and emptiness is the gateway to ultimate meaning. In the stone chamber, Subhūti contemplated arising and ceasing as impermanent and entered emptiness; through emptiness he attained the path and saw the Buddha’s Dharma-body. Zhiyi says with reservation that this is perhaps the gateway upheld by the Satyasiddhi Treatise.

Third is the gateway both existent and empty. This teaching explains that right causes and conditions arising and ceasing are both existent and empty. By receiving it, one can break views that cling partially either to existence or nonexistence, see the existence and emptiness of causes and conditions, arouse the true uncontaminated, and see truth through existence and nonexistence. Existence and nonexistence thereby become the gateway to ultimate meaning. Kātyāyana entered the path through this gateway and therefore composed the Kunle Treatise, which in turn upholds this gateway.

Fourth is the gateway neither existent nor nonexistent. This teaching explains the principle that right causes and conditions arising and ceasing are neither existent nor nonexistent. By receiving it, one can break wrong attachments falling into the extremes of existence and nonexistence, see causes and conditions as neither existent nor nonexistent, arouse the true uncontaminated, and see truth through neither existence nor nonexistence. Neither existence nor nonexistence thereby becomes the gateway to ultimate meaning. Channa of harsh speech entered the path through this gateway, but no treatise upholding it has yet been seen. Some say that the Vātsīputrīya Abhidharma upholds this meaning: that treatise places the person in a fifth, inexpressible category. The person does not belong to the three times of past, present, or future, and therefore it is not an existent self; nor is the person an unconditioned dharma, and therefore it is not a nonexistent self. Zhiyi considers this claim not yet certain enough to adopt.

4. The Four Gateways of the Shared Teaching

Second are the four gateways of the Shared Teaching. These are Mahāyāna gateways, shared by the Shared and reaching into the Distinct; one side cannot be taken in isolation. For now, the four gateways are discussed only in terms of what is shared by the Shared.

The preceding four Tripiṭaka gateways all extinguish form in order to enter emptiness. This resembles analyzing the head of a supposedly real person into six parts and seeking the person in each part until none can be found; it is therefore called empty. The four gateways of the Shared Teaching instead teach that form itself is immediately empty. This resembles looking at a mirror image: the head and its six parts are empty just as they appear, without waiting for analysis to exhaust them before they become empty. The meaning cited from the Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom is: “The Buddha told the monk: contemplating emptiness is precisely cloth, and contemplating cloth is precisely emptiness.” This is how a gateway that embodies dharmas differs from one that analyzes them.

The Tripiṭaka Teaching first contemplates the emptiness of sentient beings and attains the path, then afterward contemplates the emptiness of dharmas; the two objects of sentient beings and dharmas do not interpenetrate. In a Shared gateway, however, the emptiness of sentient beings is precisely the emptiness of dharmas, and the emptiness of dharmas precisely the emptiness of sentient beings, without distinction. The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra says that the nature of form is like the nature of self and the nature of self is like the nature of form; both are like an illusion.

Some say that the Tripiṭaka Teaching merely breaks the imputation of a real self-nature and, because no self can be found in supposedly real dharmas, contemplates only emptiness of nature, whereas the Great Vehicle understands the self-nature of characteristics to be empty without any need to examine them. This is only a provisional generalization. The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra says that dharmas are constantly empty in nature, with no moment when they are not empty in nature. One should understand all dharmas as illusions, a moon in water, and images in a mirror; how could this concern only the emptiness of characteristics?

The four gateways can be determined through this meaning of illusion. The treatise says: “Everything is real; everything is unreal; everything is both real and unreal; everything is neither real nor unreal.” The Buddha broadly teaches the siddhānta of ultimate meaning through these four propositions.

The first proposition, “everything is real,” establishes the gateway of existence. Karma and fruit, wholesome and unwholesome, and even nirvāṇa are all like illusions. A mirror image has no real nature but still displays illusory parts such as a head; on this basis the gateway of existence is established. Second, since dharmas are like illusions, illusions originally have no real substance. Because there is no real substance, they are empty; even nirvāṇa is like an illusion. A mirror image provisionally displays form, yet when sought it cannot be found. This is the gateway of emptiness.

Third, dharmas are called existent because they are like illusions and empty because the illusion cannot be attained. A mirror image can be seen yet cannot be found as something seen; it cannot be found and yet appears to be seen. This is the gateway both empty and existent. Fourth, even illusory existence cannot be attained, so how much less can a separate illusory emptiness be grasped as attainable? Relinquishing both extremes of existence and emptiness establishes the fourth gateway. These are the four gateways of the Shared Teaching’s immediate emptiness.

Śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and bodhisattvas of the three vehicles receive this teaching together, yet their faculties differ. Each enters ultimate meaning through the proposition suited to them, and all four propositions are therefore called gateways. Piṅgala’s commentary on the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā says, “The true mark of dharmas has three kinds.” Here, the three kinds of person enter this gateway together and see ultimate meaning; this is precisely one kind of immediate emptiness.

5. Gateway Characteristics in the Distinct and Perfect Teachings

Third are the four gateways of the Distinct Teaching. If the phrase “also called a provisional name” in the verse of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā is used to distinguish four gateways, it carries the same intent as the four propositions in the Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom.

It is called distinct because below it differs from the Tripiṭaka and Shared Teachings in seven ways, while above it also differs from the Perfect Teaching. Practitioners enter the Middle through sequential distinctions, and it is therefore called distinct. This meaning comes mainly from the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra, though the scripture teaches it dispersed across many places. The four gateways of the Distinct Teaching are now shown through milk and related similes.

The scripture says that buddha-nature is like curds present in milk, gold present in stone, or a jewel present in a strongman’s forehead; this is the gateway of existence. Saying that stone has no nature of gold and milk no nature of curds, that the buddha-nature of sentient beings is like empty space, that great nirvāṇa is empty, and that Kapilavastu is empty establishes the gateway of emptiness. The scripture also says that buddha-nature both exists and does not exist. Why does it exist? Because all sentient beings possess it. Why does it not exist? Because it can be seen only through wholesome skillful means. It further compares this to milk that both has the nature of curds and lacks the nature of curds; this is the gateway both existent and nonexistent. Saying that buddha-nature is the Middle Way, negating and dispelling both extremes, and comparing it to milk that neither has nor lacks the nature of curds establishes the gateway neither empty nor existent.

Bodhisattvas of the Distinct Teaching receive the teaching of these four gateways, see buddha-nature through them, and abide in great nirvāṇa; the four propositions are therefore the four gateways of the Distinct Teaching. This only provisionally correlates scriptural passages with the Distinct gateways. The same wording may sometimes bear a Perfect meaning, and this will be analyzed in detail later.

The four gateways of the Perfect Teaching enter the ultimate meaning of buddha-nature. At first sight their names and meanings resemble those of the Distinct gateways, but close examination reveals many different paths of intent. Their similarities and differences will be distinguished in detail later.

6. What the Gateways Access

The second major division, showing contemplation for entering a gateway, has two parts: first, briefly showing the point accessed by the gateway; second, briefly showing the contemplations through which one enters.

First is the point accessed by the gateways. Broadly, there are sixteen gateways that give access, but only two kinds of principle accessed: partial truth and perfect truth. The first eight gateways all enter partial truth, and the latter eight all enter perfect truth.

Why is the principle of partial truth only one, while eight gateways give access to it? The four gateways of the Tripiṭaka Teaching follow a winding and narrow route and are called a clumsy crossing. The four gateways of the Shared Teaching are Mahāyāna, broad and direct, and are called a skillful crossing. Because skillful and clumsy differ, the gateways giving access number eight; because truth is not two, what is accessed remains one. It is like a provincial city with gateways on all four sides. The four oblique gateways represent the Tripiṭaka Teaching, and the four direct gateways represent the Shared Teaching. Oblique and direct gateways differ, making eight means of access, yet there is only one governor in the city and the point accessed is not two.

The four gateways of the Distinct Teaching are partial and not yet interpenetrating; the four gateways of the Perfect Teaching are perfect and interpenetrating. Because partial and perfect differ, the gateways giving access likewise number eight; because perfect truth is not two, what is accessed remains one. It is like an imperial capital with gateways on all four sides. The four oblique gateways represent the Distinct Teaching, and the four direct gateways represent the Perfect Teaching. Oblique and direct gateways differ, making eight means of access, yet there is only one emperor and the point accessed is one.

Someone asks: the Lesser Vehicle has only one set of four gateways; why does the Mahāyāna have three sets? The answer is that the Lesser Vehicle is shallow and near, severing bonds within one lifetime, like a small household. The Great Vehicle is profound and distant, and the path of access is long, like a great household requiring a thousand gateways and ten thousand doors. How could three sets of four be considered many?

Another question asks: how can a Mahāyāna gateway let three kinds of person see truth together? The answer is that this gateway is primarily intended to access the Great Vehicle and only secondarily accesses the Lesser. A kingdom has a public gateway and a special gateway. The special gateway leads to officials at court, while the public gateway also leads to the market. It cannot be called a gateway for commoners simply because ordinary people also pass through it. The Mahāyāna public gateway is the same: it primarily accesses the true mark and secondarily accesses true truth. People of the three vehicles reduce the body to ashes and extinguish cognition partly by using this gateway; the fact that it additionally accesses partial truth does not make it a Lesser Vehicle gateway.

7. The Ten Contemplations of the Tripiṭaka Gateway of Existence

Next is a brief showing of the contemplations through which one enters. First come the contemplations of the Tripiṭaka gateway of existence. This gateway includes both practitioners through faith and practitioners through Dharma. Those who awaken immediately on hearing a teaching have swift and sharp minds, and the way they attain the path is difficult to display clearly to others. The text therefore provisionally treats the gateway of contemplation for practitioners through Dharma in ten items: first, recognizing the object contemplated; second, genuinely arousing resolve; third, following and cultivating concentration and wisdom; fourth, pervasively breaking through all dharmas; fifth, clearly knowing what gives passage and what obstructs; sixth, skillfully using the factors of the path; seventh, skillfully using counteractives; eighth, clearly knowing the stages; ninth, skillfully enduring; tenth, not producing Dharma attachment.

The Abhidharma contains all ten meanings, though its passages are scattered. Even if treatise masters wish to cultivate the path, without knowing which route to follow they resemble people confused at a fork, not knowing where to go. The essential meanings are now gathered so that the ten items run through cultivation from beginning to end, making the contemplative method of entering the path through the gateway of existence recognizable.

1. Recognizing the Object Contemplated

First, one must recognize how ignorance as right causes and conditions gives rise to all dharmas. Saying that worldly suffering and happiness are produced by Viṣṇu, a primordial nature of the world, or atoms is arising from wrong causes and conditions. Saying that everything is naturally so, with no maker, is arising without causes and conditions. The claim of no causes and conditions destroys causes without destroying the evident results, while wrong causes and conditions also destroy right cause and result. None of these is an object of right causes and conditions, and they should not be contemplated.

Abhidharma enumerators preserve the smallest particle, while discursive treatises refute it. This dispute over existence and nonexistence is easily confused with claims of wrong cause and no cause, and is perhaps not the object of right causes and conditions. Why? Taking the smallest particle as existent or nonexistent does not escape the two views of existence and nonexistence and remains ignorance and inversion. From inversion comes accumulation, and from accumulation one experiences results such as coarse and subtle form. Since ignorance and inversion themselves are not real, how can the painful results they produce be fixed as existent or nonexistent? Thus the meaning cited from the Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom is: “Whether form is coarse or subtle, contemplated as a whole it is impermanent and without self.” Because it is without self, it has no master. Coarse and subtle, cause and condition, suffering and accumulation, dependent and primary recompense are all impermanent and masterless, produced by ignorance and inversion. The Abhidharma gateways discuss this extensively. This is recognizing the object of right causes and conditions, unlike the wrong causes and absence of causes taught by non-Buddhists.

2. Genuinely Arousing Resolve

Second is genuinely arousing resolve. Once one recognizes that ignorance and inversion keep formations and consciousness revolving through aging-and-death like a spinning firebrand, one should wish to bring afflictions and karma to rest, rightly seek nirvāṇa, arouse the mind of the two vehicles, and leave the delusions of views and craving. This resolve does not seek reputation or gain. It seeks only to break all modes of existence, no longer increase suffering and accumulation, and direct itself solely toward nirvāṇa without remainder. A mind that is pure, unmixed, and sincere is called genuinely arousing resolve, unlike the resolve of non-Buddhists and heavenly Māras.

3. Following and Cultivating Concentration and Wisdom

Third is following and cultivating concentration and wisdom. Having vowed to seek liberation, practitioners abide by the prātimokṣa discipline and cultivate the path. Yet the obstructions of wrongdoing race about in confusion, and the mind cannot settle; how could the path be accomplished? They therefore cultivate the four establishments of mindfulness, train in the five meditations for settling the mind, and break the five obstructions. The concrete contemplations of the five meditations are concentration; the mindfulness arising from concentration is wisdom. Because wisdom and concentration are balanced evenly, this is called settling the mind; because concentration and wisdom are harmonized, it is also called calming the mind.

Having neither concentration nor wisdom, having only concentration or only wisdom, or having concentration and wisdom without balanced harmony cannot be called worthy. A worthy person in the world must possess both wisdom and virtue: wisdom makes the person knowledgeable in every matter, while virtue leaves beautiful conduct complete. Only Xu You and Chao Fu could be called worthy. One with much wisdom but little virtue is called mad; one with much virtue but little wisdom is called foolish; neither the mad nor the foolish are worthy. “Worthy” carries the meanings capable and wholesome: because one is wholesome, one has virtue; because one is capable, one has wisdom. Only one possessing both wisdom and virtue is called worthy. Practitioners are the same: they cultivate the wisdom of the four establishments of mindfulness and train in the concentration of the five meditations for settling the mind; concentration and wisdom must both be complete.

How are concentration and wisdom both complete when counting breaths? One gathers in every scattered thought, counts from one to ten, and at the same time clearly knows that both breathing and counting arise and cease impermanently, never remaining for one thought. In contemplation of impurity, one must deeply reject foul and unwholesome characteristics while also knowing that the contemplating mind and contemplated object both arise and cease impermanently, rapidly decay, and are false, having long deceived sentient beings. If this contemplation of repulsiveness gives rise to anger, it must be balanced with the concentration of kindness. On seeing others attain happiness, one must likewise know that both this concentration and the other person’s characteristic of happiness arise and cease impermanently.

When contemplating causes and conditions, horizontally contemplate the four kinds of birth—womb, egg, moisture, and transformation—as all dependently arisen dharmas; vertically contemplate the desire, form, and formless realms as likewise all dependently arisen dharmas. Everything arising from conditions is impermanent and without self. When any obstruction arises, one should recollect the Buddha, likewise cultivating both concentration and wisdom in the act of recollection. Thus all five meditations for settling the mind cultivate concentration and wisdom together.

Because one has concentration, one is not mad; because one has wisdom, one is not foolish. Taking this settlement as the foundation of all practices, one gives rise to warmth and summit and enters the true illumination of receptivity to suffering. Being near the noble stage is the reason one is called worthy. Non-Buddhists do not know how to churn and agitate milk; even obtaining milk serum is difficult for them, much less making curds, ghee, and the other products.

4. Pervasively Breaking through All Dharmas

Fourth is pervasively breaking through dharmas and thereby accomplishing the path through seeing existence. After settling the mind in concentration and wisdom, if one cultivates the shared establishments of mindfulness following the five meditations, contemplation of impurity and the others are carried along and all dharmas are pervasively broken through, accomplishing both concrete and principle contemplation. If one instead cultivates only the establishment of mindfulness concerning nature, one attends solely to principle and pervasively breaks all views through the wisdom of impermanence. The contemplation that breaks views is explained in the final two chapters of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā.

When the Buddha first turned the Dharma wheel, he taught no other Dharma, but only impermanence. Through impermanence he pervasively broke the sixty-two views of all non-Buddhists—existence, nonexistence, both existence and nonexistence, neither existence nor nonexistence, and whether spirit and world are permanent or impermanent—purifying them. Some Abhidharma masters were then challenged with the claim that impermanence belongs to the Lesser Vehicle and permanence to the Great Vehicle, that permanence can break impermanence but impermanence cannot break permanence. If the preceding meaning is understood, this cannot stand.

Before attaining the path, whatever an attached mind calculates as permanent, impermanent, both permanent and impermanent, neither permanent nor impermanent, and so forth consists of views produced when Dharma-objects meet the mind faculty. Views arise from conditions, and everything arising from conditions is impermanent. How then could the permanence, happiness, self, and purity grasped by non-Buddhists be established? These four inversions can all be broken through impermanence. Thus five hundred monks told Datou, “Simply cultivate impermanence: one can attain the path and attain supernormal power.” The group of six monks likewise taught others nothing but impermanence. One should understand that all views, whether deep or shallow, are broken through impermanence, unlike the old physician who treated every illness only with milk medicine.

5. Clearly Knowing Passage and Obstruction

Fifth is knowing passage and obstruction. Although the preceding section pervasively broke the faults of views, it had not yet shown their virtues. Fault is obstruction; virtue is passage. The eighty-eight compulsions within the view of existence, and the eighty-eight compulsions within views up through neither existence nor nonexistence and the inexpressible, all arise from conditions and are called obstruction; because they obstruct, they must be broken. One must also recognize passage within them: the truths of path and cessation within the view of existence, and the truths of path and cessation within views up through neither existence nor nonexistence and the inexpressible, likewise arise from causes and conditions and are called passage. Since they give passage, why should they be broken?

If people do not recognize views, take their own view as fact, and call all other claims false speech, attachment to the view becomes karma, craving moistens the karma, and a result is experienced. Is this not obstruction? If in each view they know it to be impermanent and inverted and do not form calculated attachment, then without attachment there is no karma, and without karma there is no result. Such penetration contains the truths of path and cessation; is it not passage? This differs from a non-Buddhist resembling a worm eating wood: its gnawing accidentally forms a shape, but the worm itself does not know whether the shape is a written graph.

6. Skillfully Cultivating the Factors of the Path

Sixth, one cannot merely recognize passage and obstruction, but must cultivate the factors of the path and advance through the various Dharma-gateways. Contemplate views from the view of existence through the inexpressible as all depending on the body of form, which is filthy and impure: this is the establishment of mindfulness of body. Contemplate feelings from existent feeling through inexpressible feeling as never apart from pleasant, painful, and neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling, and feeling itself as suffering: this is the establishment of mindfulness of feeling. Contemplate the perceptions and formations arising from views as all without self: this is the establishment of mindfulness of dharmas. Contemplate the mind producing the various views as impermanent from thought to thought: this is the establishment of mindfulness of mind.

Cultivating these four contemplations is gaining right recollection among conditioned dharmas. Through this right mindfulness, the four inversions are subdued; these are called the four establishments of mindfulness. Diligently cultivating the four contemplations is called the four right efforts. Cultivating them within concentrated mind is called the four bases of supernormal power. When the five wholesome roots arise, they are called the five faculties; when the five faculties grow and ward off unwholesome dharmas, they are called the five powers. Harmonized concentration and wisdom are called the seven factors of awakening. Traveling securely on the path is called the noble eightfold path. Here the factors of the path are not arranged by stage; the thirty-seven factors are discussed together as a common cultivation. A single meditation for settling the mind can generate all thirty-seven factors, and the other meditations are the same. The truth of the path in the Abhidharma distinguishes them more broadly.

These thirty-seven factors are the Dharmas for traveling the path and carry the practitioner toward three gateways of the city of nirvāṇa. Two aspects under the truth of suffering form the gateway of liberation through emptiness. The four aspects under accumulation and the four under path, together with two further aspects under suffering, form the gateway of liberation through non-activity. The four aspects under cessation form the gateway of liberation through signlessness. When the gateway of nirvāṇa opens, the practitioner can enter. Thus the Buddha issued a definitive lion’s roar in the scene called the Subhadra Sūtra: “Only in my Dharma is there a noble eightfold path; non-Buddhist Dharmas do not have even one path, much less eight.”

7. Skillfully Using Counteractives

Seventh is skillfully cultivating counteractives. People of sharp faculties can enter through the primary path. Those who cannot enter must cultivate auxiliary practices. Thus the treatise says that the twelve meditations and related practices are all methods assisting in opening the gateway. When the power of right wisdom is weak, obstructing conditions arise, and auxiliary paths must be cultivated as support. The treatise lists: “When desire arises, teach the contemplation of impurity, the liberations, and so forth. When someone lacks mastery of objects, teach the spheres of mastery. When the objects are not broad and universal, teach the totalities. When merit is slight, teach the immeasurable minds. When someone wishes to transcend the form realm, teach the four formless attainments.” All these are auxiliary paths helping the primary path open the gateway, unlike non-Buddhists who give rise to craving, views, and pride within the fundamental meditations.

8. Clearly Knowing the Stages

Eighth is clearly knowing the stages. Even after cultivating the primary and auxiliary practices just described, one cannot immediately claim to be a noble person, confuse true with resembling attainment, and fail to distinguish worthy and noble stages. When one understands the difference between true and resembling stages and knows one is not yet noble, overweening pride cannot arise. This differs from non-Buddhists who produce attachment to discipline and views and mistake dharmas of birth-and-death for nirvāṇa.

9. Skillfully Enduring

Ninth is skillfully cultivating endurance. The separate establishments of mindfulness remain weak and not yet fully open and fluent, and so one turns to cultivate the general establishments of mindfulness: one may contemplate one generally, two generally, and so forth through all four generally. At this point one must endure so that contemplation of the truths matures, enters the warmth-dharma, and gives rise to smoke resembling the true path. The meaning cited from the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra is: “Although the warmth-dharma is contaminated and conditioned, it can nevertheless destroy what is contaminated and conditioned.” It also says, “My disciples possess it; non-Buddhists do not.”

If one endures, the summit-dharma is accomplished; when summit is complete, one is said to have reached the margin of receptivity. If one cannot endure, one falls back to this side. Thus it is said that someone who loses the summit-dharma may commit the five heinous acts, while someone who loses the warmth-dharma may become an icchantika. For this reason practitioners must skillfully endure every inner and outer obstruction, unlike non-Buddhists who cannot endure subtle obstructing dharmas.

10. Not Producing Dharma Attachment

Tenth is not producing Dharma attachment. The four wholesome roots of warmth, summit, receptivity, and the foremost worldly dharma have now arisen. If Dharma attachment arises at this point, one will not regress to committing the five heinous acts or becoming an icchantika, yet one cannot enter seeing the truths. The object is therefore contracted in three successive rounds, advancing to accomplish higher receptivity and arouse the foremost worldly dharma and the true illumination of receptivity to suffering. Within sixteen moments one attains the first fruit, or directly attains a higher fruit; one may also apply the contemplation again, sever the five lower and five higher fetters, and become one beyond learning.

People of sharp faculties can enter at each successive step when applying contemplation; people of dull faculties must pass through all ten. Although the Abhidharma explains the matter broadly, it never leaves these ten meanings.

Five hundred arhats composed the Vibhāṣā precisely to uphold attainment of the path through the gateway of existence. How could the gateway of existence be described merely as a means of regulating the mind? When properly adjusted, all four gateways enable attainment of the path; when grasped, none enables attainment. If one says only that seeing existence enables the path while seeing emptiness does not, how is this different from non-Buddhists? Thus the meaning cited from the Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom is: “Without the skillful means of prajñā, one falls into the extremes of existence and nonexistence.” The ten Dharmas now serve as skillful means for directly entering the gateway of truth, forever differing from non-Buddhists. This is the contemplation for entering truth through the gateway of existence.

The other gateways—emptiness, both emptiness and existence, and neither emptiness nor existence—each have their own beginning-to-end skillful means for entering truth. Compared with the gateway of existence, each differs in detail; yet all converge upon partial truth, sever delusions of the three realms, and do not differ in realization. Following the gateway of existence as their model, the other three should each contain ten contemplations. They are broadly the same with minor differences and are not recorded at length here.

8. The Ten Contemplations of the Shared Gateway of Existence

Next come the contemplations of the Shared Teaching’s gateway of existence, likewise unfolded through ten items with the same names. First, one embodies and understands all dharmas as illusory. Second, the resolves aroused by śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and bodhisattvas are broadly the same with small differences.

One Madhyamaka master says that these are Great Vehicle śrāvakas; Zhiyi disagrees. The sutra plainly says, “Those who wish to attain śrāvakahood or pratyekabuddhahood should study prajñā.” The treatise likewise says, “Śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas obtain the path of liberation and nirvāṇa entirely from prajñā.” Neither scripture nor treatise fixes them under the name asserted by that later teacher; that is a teacher’s mistaken claim.

Third, although one knows concentration and wisdom to be unattainable, one still settles the mind through these two Dharmas. Fourth, with wisdom like an illusion one pervasively breaks the four views of existence, nonexistence, both, and neither, the sixty-two views, and all dharmas. Fifth, one knows suffering and accumulation within illusion as obstruction and path and cessation within illusion as passage. Sixth, with a mind of nonattainment one cultivates the thirty-seven factors of the path. Seventh, with nothing to be counteracted one trains in every counteractive. Eighth, one clearly distinguishes the dry-wisdom ground through the buddha-ground. Ninth, wisdom like an illusion is not shaken by outer Māras or driven back by inner obstructions. Tenth, although dharmas do not arise and prajñā arises, one does not become attached to the Dharma attained.

When the ten are accomplished, one can enter true truth and, whether discussed as wisdom or severance, attain receptivity to the nonarising of dharmas. This is more skillful than the preceding analytical gateway. The ten contemplations of the Shared gateway of existence can be understood accordingly and are not described further. The other gateways of emptiness, both emptiness and existence, and neither emptiness nor existence likewise have ten items, broadly the same with minor differences, and are also not recorded at length.

9. The Ten Contemplations of the Distinct Gateway of Existence

Next come the contemplations of the Distinct Teaching’s gateway of existence, likewise with ten items.

First is contemplating the object. This object transcends the four views and four gateways of ordinary beings, is not the Dharma of the two vehicles’ four gateways, and is not the Dharma of the Shared Teaching’s four gateways. If the preceding gateway-Dharmas are made objects, they still cannot be called the true mark and cannot be fixed as either birth-and-death or nirvāṇa. Only the tathāgata-garbha is called wondrous existence and contains real Dharma. This wondrous existence supports all dharmas, and all dharmas arise from it; it is the object contemplated by the Distinct gateway of existence.

Second is arousing resolve. Bodhisattvas deeply contemplate the wondrous existence of the true mark as unmoved by birth-and-death, yet see sentient beings like a treasury of gold covered by weeds, a jewel in the strongman’s forehead lost amid fighting, or a poor orphan exposed outside. They are deeply worthy of compassion. Bodhisattvas therefore give rise to great kindness and compassion and arouse the four universal vows. The Sūtra Requested by Brahmā Viśeṣacintin has thirty-two kinds of great compassion. The meaning cited from the Mahāvaipulya Buddhāvataṃsaka Sūtra is: “Not for one person, one country, or people as numerous as the dust motes in one realm, but for all sentient beings of the Dharma realm does one arouse the mind of bodhi.” Such a resolve has great power, like a lion’s roar.

Third is settling the mind. After arousing resolve, one settles and advances in cultivation, relying on the various forms of concentration and wisdom described earlier. When a particular concentration is suitable at a given time, cultivate that concentration; when a particular wisdom is suitable at another time, cultivate that wisdom. Concentration cares for the mind and wisdom spurs it forward. One settles in cultivation of the path and relies only on these two Dharmas, not on anything else; this is the method of settling the mind.

Fourth is pervasive breaking. With the wisdom of wondrous existence, one pervasively breaks every view within birth-and-death, including the sixty-two views, and does not accept either merit or darkness. One also pervasively breaks attachment to nirvāṇa, neither sinking into emptiness nor grasping realization, like a great tree that does not host a hostile bird.

Fifth is discerning passage and obstruction. Within each dharma, a bodhisattva clearly distinguishes passage and obstruction, like the Snow Mountains holding both poisonous plants and the king of medicines. The bodhisattva must know that one kind of mind belongs to the suffering and accumulation of the six paths and is obstruction, while another belongs to the path and cessation of the two vehicles and is passage. At the next level, the suffering and accumulation of the two vehicles are obstruction and the bodhisattva path and cessation are passage. Again, bodhisattva suffering and accumulation are obstruction and only the Buddha’s path and cessation are passage. Being able to recognize what is not the path within suffering and accumulation gives access to the Buddha-path. Yet one also knows that attachment to the Buddha-path can itself produce obstruction. Clearly understanding each layer without impediment is discerning passage and obstruction.

Sixth is skillfully cultivating the factors of the path. The thirty-seven factors are the bodhisattva’s jeweled-torch dhāraṇī. The four establishments of mindfulness break inversions; the four right efforts make cultivation diligent; the four bases of supernormal power gather the mind in concentration; the five wholesome roots arise and can expel the five evils; with concentration and wisdom harmonized, one travels on a secure path. Leaving the ten characteristics is called the samādhi of emptiness; not seeing even a characteristic of emptiness is called the samādhi of signlessness; not constructing aspirations is called the samādhi of non-activity. These are Dharmas for traveling the path and already approach the gateway of nirvāṇa.

Seventh is skillfully cultivating gateways of counteraction. The paired counteractives contemplated are permanence and impermanence, constancy and inconstancy, peace and absence of peace, conditioned and unconditioned, severance and nonseverance, nirvāṇa and non-nirvāṇa, supreme and nonsupreme. Bodhisattvas continually contemplate these gateways of counteraction to help open the true mark.

Eighth is clearly knowing the stages. From the ten faiths, ten abodes, ten practices, ten dedications, and ten grounds through equal awakening and wondrous awakening, one understands the depth of noble stages without error and never claims to have falsely occupied the highest stage.

Ninth is skillfully enduring. Inwardly, one endures wholesome and unwholesome impulses and guards against the two thieves of accordance and opposition. Outwardly, one endures the eight winds of gain, loss, disgrace, praise, commendation, ridicule, suffering, and happiness. Through the power of endurance, one is not shaken by inner or outer objects.

Tenth is not giving rise to Dharma attachment. Even after realizing a resembling Dharma, one does not let Dharma attachment arise and therefore does not fall at the summit of the bodhisattva stages. If attachment arises, it is called Dharma attachment. Only without this attachment does one enter the proper bodhisattva stage, break the weeds of ignorance, reveal the treasury of wondrous existence, see buddha-nature, and enter the true mark. This is contemplation for cultivating entry into the true mark through the Distinct gateway of existence.

The contemplations for entering the true mark through the other gateways of emptiness, both emptiness and existence, and neither emptiness nor existence likewise each have ten items. Although the skillful means of the gateways differ, all converge upon perfect truth, and the principle realized is not two. The contemplations of the other three gateways can be understood from the gateway of existence and are not recorded in detail.

10. Tenfold Distinctions between Perfect and Distinct Gateways

Next come contemplations for entering the true mark through the Perfect gateways. First, the Perfect gateways are distinguished; second, Perfect contemplation is explained. The Tripiṭaka gateways extinguish supposedly real form to access truth and, when misunderstood, produce much contention. The Shared gateways embody illusory form as immediately empty and access truth, revealing a Dharma free of contention. The Distinct gateways first embody and extinguish the form of birth-and-death, then sequentially extinguish the form of Dharma-nature to access the Middle; misunderstood, they too produce much contention. A Perfect gateway teaches that the form of birth-and-death is precisely the form of Dharma-nature and accesses the Middle in that very form, revealing a Dharma free of contention. Thus the sutra speaks of “the unsurpassed path” and “practicing the profound and wondrous path”; this is their meaning.

The Tripiṭaka and Shared gateways do not access the Middle and need no further distinction here. Both Distinct and Perfect gateways access the Middle. Their similarities and differences are distinguished broadly in ten respects: first, interpenetration and noninterpenetration; second, immediacy and nonimmediacy to dharmas; third, buddha-wisdom and non-buddha-wisdom; fourth, sequential and nonsequential practice; fifth, severing through severance and severing without severance; sixth, real and unreal stages; seventh, vertically ordered and nonvertical fruit; eighth, perfect and imperfect expression; ninth, examination through questions and answers; tenth, examination through similes. Closely examining these ten meanings makes the similarities and differences of the eight gateways clear.

1. Interpenetration and Noninterpenetration

Each of the four Distinct gateways has a definite basis. The gateway of existence is based on true, good, and wondrous existence without involving emptiness. The gateway of emptiness is based on ultimate emptiness without involving existence. The gateways both existent and empty and neither empty nor existent likewise each remain within their own portion. The four gateways are sequentially distinct and give access separately. Those who misunderstand them grasp fixed characteristics, mistake wondrous existence for the real existence posited by non-Buddhists, and come close to confusing it with the claim that awakening is born from the primal darkness.

The preceding Tripiṭaka gateway of existence has already broken the wrong claims of non-Buddhists first and completely, so the other three gateways of emptiness and so forth have fewer wrong views left to break. The four skillful gateways of the Shared Teaching then break the clumsiness of the Tripiṭaka, and the Distinct gateways break the nearness and shallowness of the Shared. They no longer share a path with the two vehicles, much less can they be confused with non-Buddhist claims of awakening born from the primal darkness. Wondrous existence distinguishes four gateways through the tathāgata-garbha; how could it equal the real nature posited by Nirgranthas? The raw jade of Zhou and the “raw jade” mouse of Zheng share the same name but differ in substance, their value separated as far as heaven from earth.

Some students of the Treatise on the Grounds at that time turned away from the path and returned to lay life, secretly appropriated the meaning of wondrous existence, and found illicit comfort in Zhuangzi and Laozi. Mixing gold with stone, they caused wrong and right to become confused, so that blind and benighted people could no longer distinguish the Jing and Wei Rivers. If the intent of the gateways is truly understood and true and false are examined with precision, this theft and confusion cannot arise. Although the Distinct gateways make definite statements that can produce contention, they still concern the realm of the buddhas, which even the two vehicles do not know; how could they be equated with non-Buddhists?

Perfect gateways are open, interpenetrating, and wondrous and cannot be grasped as fixed. Speaking of existence does not separate it from nonexistence; nonexistence is discussed precisely through existence. Speaking of nonexistence does not separate it from existence; existence is discussed precisely through nonexistence. Existence and nonexistence are nondual and have no fixed characteristic. Existence is only provisionally borrowed as the opening of discourse. This gateway of existence is immediately the other three gateways. One gateway is immeasurable gateways, and immeasurable gateways are one gateway. They are neither a fixed one nor a fixed four; four are one and one is four. This is the characteristic of a Perfect gateway.

Interpenetration and noninterpenetration can be considered again through breaking and integration. Breaking only wrong views of non-Buddhists while leaving the deviations of the two vehicles and Great Vehicle skillful means unbroken is breaking that is not perfect. Integration that is not perfect appears, for example, when the Vimalakīrti Sūtra integrates vacillating ordinary beings but not śrāvakas: it integrates the company of defilements as the seed of the Tathāgata, while those who have entered the correct unconditioned stage cannot turn back. Unwholesome people in birth-and-death and the unwholesome Dharma of afflictions are integrated, while the wholesome Dharmas of the two vehicles and noble persons of the four fruits are not. This belongs to a Distinct gateway.

Prajñā teaching also says that the establishments of mindfulness and factors of the path practiced by the two vehicles are all Mahāyāna, and that desire, ignorance, views, craving, and the like are all Mahāyāna. Wholesome and unwholesome Dharmas are integrated, yet unwholesome people and people of the two vehicles are not, nor is it explained that they will become buddhas. This too belongs to a Distinct gateway.

In Perfect breaking, everything from the Distinct Teaching downward is judged a skillful means. Kāśyapa breaks his former position by saying, “Before this, we were all called people of wrong views.” If they are called people of wrong views, they have no Dharma of the perfectly right path, and so both people and Dharmas are broken. This is true even of the people and Dharmas of the Distinct Teaching, much more of those in the thatched hut. It is true even of the two vehicles, much more of ordinary beings. Perfect breaking leaves nothing fixed and preserved.

In Perfect integration, all ordinary beings attached to dharmas are integrated. The sutra tells them, “You all shall become buddhas” and “I would not dare slight you.” Devadatta, who committed the five heinous acts, receives a prediction; the dragon girl and other animals receive predictions; how much more the two vehicles and bodhisattvas. The sutra also says, “Worldly livelihood and productive activity are all not contrary to the true mark.” This integrates all unwholesome Dharmas. It says, “What you practice is the bodhisattva-path.” Even the analytical two vehicles are integrated, much more the Shared and Distinct. It says, “You are my child, and I am the father.” No person and no Dharma remains unintegrated; all interpenetrate as wondrous Dharma. This belongs to a Perfect gateway.

Perfect and nonperfect can also be judged from the sequence of a scriptural passage. If it first teaches a noninterpenetrating gateway, indicating stages before dedication, and later still teaches a noninterpenetrating gateway yet says realization interpenetrates, indicating stages after dedication, it belongs to a Distinct gateway. The same is true if it first speaks of interpenetrating realization, indicating stages after dedication, and later teaches a noninterpenetrating gateway, indicating stages before dedication.

If it first teaches an interpenetrating gateway and realization likewise interpenetrates, indicating stages after faith, and later says realization does not interpenetrate, indicating stages before the abodes, it belongs to a Perfect gateway. The same is true if it first says realization does not interpenetrate, indicating stages before the abodes, and later says realization interpenetrates, indicating stages after faith. One cannot classify a passage by seizing the single word “interpenetration”; its position in the sequence and stages of practice must also be examined.

2. Immediacy and Nonimmediacy to Dharmas

When the Distinct gateway of existence teaches existence, this is not the existence of birth-and-death, but true, good, and wondrous existence separately taught outside birth-and-death. The gateway of emptiness separately teaches ultimate emptiness outside the true truth of the two vehicles; the gateways both existent and empty and neither existent nor nonexistent are the same. These are the characteristics of the four Distinct gateways.

When the Perfect gateway of existence teaches existence, the existence of birth-and-death is immediately the existence of the true mark. All dharmas converge upon existence; existence is the Dharma realm, and outside the Dharma realm there is no further Dharma to discuss. Birth-and-death is nirvāṇa, and nirvāṇa is birth-and-death, without duality or difference. Existence is merely raised as the opening of discourse; in reality it contains all dharmas and is perfectly penetrating without obstruction. The other three gateways are the same. These are the four Perfect gateways as the present dharmas of birth-and-death.

Immediacy to dharmas may further be pervasive or not pervasive and is judged Perfect or Distinct according to whether immediacy extends throughout the five abodes of delusion, as distinguished above. When immediacy or nonimmediacy occurs earlier or later in a passage, Perfect and Distinct are likewise judged by the preceding model.

3. Buddha-Wisdom and Non-Buddha-Wisdom

When a gateway of existence distinguishes all-wisdom as understanding empty dharmas and knowledge of path varieties as illuminating the differences among buddha-dharmas as numerous as the sands of the Ganges, this is bodhisattva-wisdom and belongs to the four Distinct gateways. When it distinguishes the knowledge of all modes, possesses the five eyes, and perfectly illuminates the Dharma realm with right and universal knowledge, this is the wisdom of the buddhas and belongs to the four Perfect gateways.

At times a Distinct gateway teaches perfect wisdom and a Perfect gateway teaches distinct wisdom; at times a Distinct gateway realizes perfect wisdom and a Perfect gateway realizes distinct wisdom. Whether the statements occur earlier or later, Perfect and Distinct must be judged from the context according to the preceding model, not from the name of the wisdom alone.

4. Sequential and Nonsequential Practice

In cultivation according to a Distinct gateway of existence, one gradually passes through differentiated stages from subtle to manifest and cannot contain immeasurable practices immediately within one practice. The other three gateways are likewise sequentially distinct. These are the four Distinct gateways.

In cultivation according to a Perfect gateway of existence, all dharmas converge upon the gateway of existence and all practices converge upon the practice of existence. One practice immediately contains immeasurable practices and is called pervasive practice. The other three gateways are likewise the same. These are the four Perfect gateways. Sometimes a Distinct gateway teaches perfect practice and a Perfect gateway distinct practice; when these appear earlier or later, they must again be judged by the preceding model.

5. Severing through Severance and Severing without Severance

Ultimate principle is empty and quiescent, and the nature of ignorance originally does not exist; where could a separate wisdom be needed? If understanding and delusion cannot be attained, how could Perfect and Distinct be fixed? The meaning cited from the Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra is: “Who possesses wisdom? Who possesses afflictions?” The meaning cited from the Vimalakīrti Sūtra is: “The nature of lust, anger, and delusion is precisely liberation.” It also says, “Without severing delusion and craving, one gives rise to luminous liberation.” From this side, no fixed discussion of severance or nonseverance is made.

The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra also says, “When it is dark there is no light, and when it is light there is no darkness. When wisdom is present, there are no afflictions.” From this side, wisdom is used to sever afflictions.

The Distinct gateway of existence commonly speaks through definite divisions, gradually severing the five abodes of delusion. This is conceivable wisdom and severance; the other three gateways are likewise gradual and belong to the four Distinct gateways. The Perfect gateway of existence instead teaches the nonduality of understanding and delusion and commonly speaks of severing without severance. All five abodes are inconceivable; this is inconceivable severance. The other three gateways are likewise the same and belong to the four Perfect gateways. Sometimes a Perfect gateway speaks of severance and a Distinct gateway of severing without severance; when these occur earlier or later, they must again be judged by the preceding model.

6. Real and Unreal Stages

The Distinct gateway of existence speaks of severing views and thoughts within the realms and judges this the thirty minds; severing views, thoughts, and ignorance beyond the realms is judged the ten grounds; at the final mind of equal awakening, ignorance is completely severed; the constant fruit of wondrous awakening is beyond all bonds with nothing further to do. This actually takes the cause-stage of another tradition as the fruit-stage of one’s own and remains a skillful means rather than a real stage. The other three gateways are broadly the same with minor differences and all belong to the four Distinct gateways.

The Perfect gateway of existence instead begins from the initial arousal of resolve, cultivates the three contemplations in one mind, severs delusions within the realms, and perfectly subdues ignorance beyond the realms, judging this the ten faiths. It then advances and arouses true wisdom, perfectly severs views, thoughts, and ignorance beyond the realms, and judges this the forty minds. At the final mind of equal awakening, ignorance is forever exhausted; wondrous awakening is beyond all bonds. These are ultimate and real stages. The other three gateways are likewise the same and belong to the four Perfect gateways. Sometimes a Distinct gateway teaches real stages and a Perfect gateway unreal stages; sometimes a Distinct gateway realizes real stages and a Perfect gateway unreal stages. Wherever they occur, they must be distinguished according to context.

7. Vertically Ordered and Nonvertical Fruit

In a Distinct gateway of existence, the three virtues of Dharma-body, prajñā, and liberation form a vertical and horizontal sequence in the fruit: the Dharma-body is originally present, prajñā is accomplished through cultivation, and liberation becomes complete only at the end. Not only are the virtues of the fruit vertically ordered; causal practice is also confined. Masters of the Treatise on the Grounds say that the first ground completely fulfills the perfection of giving. The other perfections are not left entirely uncultivated, but are practiced according to one’s power and degree. Giving is completed at the first ground and does not extend into later grounds. The other Dharmas are present only in part and not complete, leaving this meaning unfinished. The other three gateways are likewise the same and belong to the four Distinct gateways.

In a Perfect gateway of existence, the three virtues are complete in the fruit, neither vertically sequenced nor horizontally arrayed. Causal practice is likewise one Dharma-gateway containing all Dharma-gateways and extends through the buddha-ground. The meaning cited from the Mahāvaipulya Buddhāvataṃsaka Sūtra is: “From the very first ground one possesses the virtues of all grounds.” The meaning cited from the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra is: “The initial graph possesses the virtues of the other forty-one graphs.” The other three gateways are likewise the same and belong to the four Perfect gateways. Sometimes a Distinct gateway teaches nonvertical fruit and a Perfect gateway vertical fruit; when these occur earlier or later, they must again be judged by the preceding model.

8. Perfect and Imperfect Expression

The gateway of existence in the Distinct Teaching does not interpenetrate perfectly; it may interpenetrate only one gateway or two. The opening of the section before the gateway provides a partial lead-in. The body within the gateway expresses noninterpenetration, nonimmediacy, bodhisattva-wisdom, and so forth through partial similes. The conclusion after the gateway returns to noninterpenetration, nonimmediacy, and related meanings. The other three gateways are likewise the same and belong to the four Distinct gateways.

In the Perfect Teaching’s gateway of existence, one gateway is immediately the other three. The lead-in before the gateway is perfect. The body within the gateway expresses interpenetration, immediacy, buddha-wisdom, and so forth through perfect similes. The conclusion after the gateway again establishes interpenetration, immediacy, and related meanings. The other three gateways are likewise the same and belong to the four Perfect gateways. Sometimes a Distinct gateway uses perfect expression and a Perfect gateway distinct expression; when they occur earlier or later, they must again be judged by the preceding model.

9. Determining through Questions and Answers

If the meaning taught through a gateway of existence has not yet been distinguished as Perfect or Distinct, one should trace the questions and answers in the text and repeatedly examine and verify them. Its Perfect or Distinct intent will then become apparent. The other three gateways are likewise judged through questions and answers.

10. Determining through Similes

Before and after the gateways, gold, silver, and precious objects may be used as similes, or wish-fulfilling jewels, the sun, and the moon may be used. Some similes are correlated according to a Distinct meaning and some according to a Perfect meaning. Following how simile and Dharma are correlated naturally reveals the characteristics of Perfect and Distinct.

When these ten meanings are used for a profound survey of the scriptures, the two kinds of Perfect and Distinct gateways become luminously clear.

11. Ten Meanings in the Present Sutra and Its Four Perfect Gateways

The number of sets of gateways may again be distinguished through the five flavors: the milk teaching has two sets of four gateways, the curds teaching one set, the raw-ghee teaching four sets, the refined-ghee teaching three sets, and the present sutra only one set.

The ten meanings above can be seen in the present sutra. It says to “contemplate all dharmas as empty, as the true mark,” definitively resolves the Dharma of śrāvakas, calls itself king among the sutras, and speaks of opening the gateway of skillful means. These interpenetrate the people and Dharmas of ordinary beings, the Lesser Vehicle, and the Great Vehicle. It says, “All worldly livelihood and productive activity are not contrary to the true mark,” showing that the former hired laborer is the elder’s son. This is the meaning of immediacy to dharmas.

The sutra speaks of opening, revealing, awakening to, and entering the Buddha’s knowing-and-seeing and says that what must now be done is only buddha-wisdom. This is buddha-wisdom. It speaks of putting on the Tathāgata’s robe, together with seat, room, and so forth; this is nonsequential practice. It also speaks of purifying the faculties without severing the five desires. It says “and further passes five hundred yojanas”; this is severing without severance.

The five grades, purification of the six faculties, and riding the jeweled vehicle to travel in the four directions are real stages. The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle, is adorned by the powers of concentration and wisdom, and uses it to liberate sentient beings; this is nonvertical fruit. Joining palms with a reverent mind and wishing to hear the complete path is perfect expression before the passage of the present Buddha. Saying that the meaning of the true mark of all dharmas has already been taught to all is perfect expression after the passage of an ancient Buddha. The questions and answers between Wisdom Accumulation and the dragon girl reveal the Perfect; the wheel-turning king’s jewel at his crown and the high, broad jeweled cart are Perfect similes. With all ten meanings complete, the Perfect gateway is clear.

The four characteristics of the perfectly interpenetrating gateways can now be stated. The sutra says that the Buddha’s wisdom is subtle, wondrous, and foremost, and that the Buddha uses the Tathāgata’s wisdom to contemplate the distant past as if it were today. Wisdom illuminating and knowing wondrous Dharma is the gateway of existence. All dharmas are empty, constantly bearing the characteristic of quiescent extinction and ultimately returning to emptiness; this is the gateway of emptiness. Dharmas constantly lack self-nature, yet the buddha-seed arises from conditions; this is the gateway both empty and existent. Neither such nor different, neither false nor real, it negates both and relinquishes the two extremes; this is the gateway neither empty nor existent.

The four characteristics mark the gateways and the ten meanings distinguish Perfect and Distinct. One can therefore know that the present sutra clearly teaches the four Perfect gateways.

12. The Ten Contemplations of the Perfect Gateway of Existence

The four Perfect gateways are now known. Contemplation is next cultivated according to the gateway of existence, again in ten items.

1. The Inconceivable Object

In contrast with the preceding twelve conceivable gateways, the present object is called inconceivable. The inconceivable object is the Four Truths of the one reality.

The truth of the suffering of birth-and-death is inconceivable and is immediately empty, provisional, and middle. Because it is empty, it is called purity of skillful means; because it is provisional, perfect purity; because it is middle, purity of nature. The three purities are attained in one mind and called great nirvāṇa. The meaning cited from the Vimalakīrti Sūtra is: “All sentient beings are precisely great nirvāṇa.” These are therefore called the inconceivable Four Truths. Since all sentient beings originally are great nirvāṇa, they cannot be extinguished again. The present truth of the suffering of birth-and-death is thus unconstructed cessation and simultaneously accumulation and path.

The truth of accumulation in afflictions is likewise inconceivable and immediately empty, provisional, and middle. Because it is empty, it is called all-wisdom; because it is provisional, knowledge of path varieties; because it is middle, the knowledge of all modes. The three wisdoms are attained in one mind and called great prajñā. The meaning cited from the Vimalakīrti Sūtra is: “All sentient beings are precisely the mark of bodhi; it cannot be attained separately again.” The present truth of accumulation in afflictions is thus unconstructed path and simultaneously suffering and cessation. These are called the inconceivable Four Truths of the one reality.

This is also true, good, and wondrous form. Because birth-and-death is empty, it is called true; because birth-and-death is provisional, it is called good; because birth-and-death is middle, it is called wondrous. This is the inconceivable object of the Perfect gateway of existence.

2. Genuinely Arousing Resolve

All sentient beings originally are great nirvāṇa, so why do they remain inverted and mistake original happiness for suffering? A bodhisattva therefore gives rise to great compassion and makes two vows: to liberate those not yet liberated and to sever what has not yet been severed. All afflictions originally are bodhi, so why do sentient beings remain benighted and mistake the path for what is not the path? A bodhisattva therefore gives rise to great kindness and makes two more vows: to enable those who do not yet know to know and those who have not yet attained to realize.

This is objectless kindness and compassion and pure vows. The power of the wholesome root of kindness naturally draws in all sentient beings and abandons no one.

3. Settling the Mind through Concentration and Wisdom

Once embodiment and understanding of the true mark are complete and resolve fully aroused, how can one merely stand beside a pool watching fish but refuse to make a net? How can one pack provisions and bind one’s legs for a journey yet remain seated and not go? The first simile means that one who knows the wondrous object contemplated must begin practice. The second means that one who has aroused universal vows must advance. Neither level may stop at preparation.

The essentials of cultivation do not go beyond concentration and wisdom. When yin and yang are harmonized, the myriad things flourish and bear fruit; when rain and drought lose their proper measure, things only scorch or rot—how could they grow? When the two wheels of a cart are level, it can carry; when both wings of a bird are complete, it can rise in flight. Embodying birth-and-death as precisely nirvāṇa is called concentration. Penetrating affliction as precisely bodhi is called wisdom. Skillfully cultivating concentration and wisdom in one mind completes all practices.

4. Pervasively Breaking through All Dharmas

This wondrous wisdom is like a vajra axe, shattering everything it strikes, and like a sun without cataract, illuminating everything it reaches. If birth-and-death is precisely nirvāṇa, the truths of suffering consisting in segmented and transformational birth-and-death are entirely broken. If afflictions are precisely bodhi, the truths of accumulation consisting in the four and five abodes of delusion are entirely broken. Although breaking is spoken of, no fixed object is broken, because birth-and-death itself is precisely nirvāṇa.

5. Skillfully Discerning Passage and Obstruction

Discerning passage and obstruction is like a commander’s treasure making the proper choice: it restrains the strong and makes them retreat, and soothes the weak and makes them advance. Knowing the faults of birth-and-death is called obstruction; knowing birth-and-death as precisely nirvāṇa is called passage. Afflictions bring disturbance and are called obstruction; knowing afflictions as precisely bodhi is called passage.

From the four views of non-Buddhists all the way to the four gateways of the Perfect Teaching, practitioners must discern passage and obstruction. Attachment at any step is obstruction; losing attachment and revealing the wondrous at any step is passage. If one cannot distinguish smooth from dangerous roads among dharmas, not only will practice fail to advance, but the precious treasure carried along will also be lost.

6. Skillfully Discerning the Factors of the Path

Contemplating birth-and-death as precisely nirvāṇa, one sees the form aggregate in the birth-and-death of the ten realms as neither pure nor impure, and so forth through the consciousness aggregate as neither permanent nor impermanent. This breaks the eight inversions of permanence, happiness, self, and purity, and impermanence, suffering, no-self, and impurity; it is the four establishments of mindfulness of Dharma-nature. Within the establishments are all the factors of the path, the three gates of liberation, and all dharmas.

Knowing nirvāṇa as precisely birth-and-death reveals four withered trees. Knowing birth-and-death as precisely nirvāṇa reveals four flourishing trees. Knowing birth-and-death and nirvāṇa as nondual is the truth of the one reality, neither withered nor flourishing, and abides in great nirvāṇa. These three levels of withered, flourishing, and neither together reveal the meaning of the factors of the path.

7. Skillfully Cultivating Counteractives

When the primary path faces many obstructions, auxiliary paths must be cultivated. Contemplating birth-and-death as precisely nirvāṇa treats the obstruction of recompense; contemplating afflictions as precisely bodhi treats karmic obstruction and the obstruction of afflictions.

8. Clearly Knowing the Stages

The dharmas of birth-and-death originally are nirvāṇa; this is nirvāṇa as principle. Understanding birth-and-death as nirvāṇa is nirvāṇa in name. Diligently contemplating birth-and-death as nirvāṇa is nirvāṇa in contemplative practice. The arising of wholesome roots and virtues is resembling nirvāṇa. The arising of real wisdom is partial realization of nirvāṇa. Reaching the bottom of birth-and-death is ultimate nirvāṇa. Contemplating afflictions as precisely bodhi is explained through the same six levels of principle, name, contemplative practice, resemblance, partial realization, and ultimate.

9. Skillfully Enduring

Practitioners must endure strong and soft inner and outer obstructions without allowing the contemplating mind to be destroyed. While contemplating birth-and-death as precisely nirvāṇa, they are not shaken or damaged by the aggregates, entrances, objects, illness, karma, Māras, dhyāna, the two vehicles, bodhisattvas, and other objects. While contemplating afflictions as precisely bodhi, they are not shaken or damaged by views or overweening pride.

10. Freedom from Dharma Attachment

After all obstructing difficulties have been passed and the root of the path established, various virtues arise. Because one contemplates birth-and-death as precisely nirvāṇa, the virtues of dhyāna and samādhi arise. Because one contemplates afflictions as precisely bodhi, dhāraṇīs, fearlessnesses, distinctive Dharmas, and various forms of prajñā arise. Because one contemplates birth-and-death and nirvāṇa as nondual, the Dharma-body and true mark arise.

When resembling virtues arise in accord with principle, the mind easily produces attachment to Dharmas that accord with the path; this is called Dharma attachment. Dharma attachment prevents further ascent without immediately causing descent and is called falling from the summit. As soon as Dharma attachment arises, it must be swiftly extinguished. Only after it is extinguished can one break ignorance, open the Buddha’s knowing-and-seeing, and realize the substance of the true mark.

Because one contemplates birth-and-death as precisely nirvāṇa, one realizes liberation. Because one contemplates afflictions as precisely bodhi, one realizes prajñā. Because one knows the two as nondual, one realizes the Dharma-body. One body is immeasurable bodies, like an unsurpassed heap of jewels and a perfect wish-fulfilling jewel, containing all dharmas. This is called entering the real through the gateway of existence and realizing the sutra’s substance. The other three gateways likewise possess all ten contemplations and enter the real.

13. Dispersed Passages in the Present Sutra Complete the Ten Contemplations

These ten contemplations are fully present in the text of the present sutra. It says, “This Dharma cannot be shown; the characteristics of words are quiescent and extinct. None among the remaining kinds of sentient beings can understand it.” It also says, “My Dharma is wondrous and difficult to conceive.” These reveal the inconceivable object.

One gives rise to great kindness toward all sentient beings and great compassion toward those not yet bodhisattvas. The sutra says, “When I attain complete awakening, I will draw them with the power of supernormal penetration and the power of wisdom and enable them to abide in this Dharma.” This reveals genuinely arousing resolve. The sutra further says that the Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and, according to the Dharma attained, is adorned by the powers of concentration and wisdom. This is settling in the two Dharmas of concentration and wisdom, accomplishing oneself and others.

The Dharma-king who breaks existence reveals pervasive breaking. The light of the sun and moon can also dispel every darkness. The sutra says, “This person travels through the world and can break the darkness of sentient beings.” This too reveals pervasive breaking. It says, “There is a guide leading the people, clear and resolute in mind, who saves the people amid dangers.” This reveals skillfully discerning passage and obstruction.

Pure Store and Pure Eye skillfully cultivate the thirty-seven factors of the path and the perfections, encompassing both factors of the path and counteractives. Increasing the path and diminishing birth, traveling in the four directions, reveals discerning stages. Abiding unmoved like the summit of Mount Sumeru and putting on the Tathāgata’s robe reveals endurance. Hearing all these sounds without attachment, the six faculties of eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind all pure in this way, together with the phrase “the truly pure great Dharma,” reveals freedom from Dharma attachment.

The passages proving the ten contemplations are dispersed throughout the sutra, and people often fail to see them. They are now gathered into ten items and placed under the gateway of existence as contemplation. The other three gateways are broadly the same with minor differences and likewise enter the real through ten contemplations.

Moreover, the intent of these ten contemplations appears not only in the present sutra; scriptures and treatises of both the Lesser and Great Vehicles contain them. Just as Mount Malaya produces only sandalwood, this Dharma-gateway is certainly not found in the four Vedas of non-Buddhists or in the works of Zhuangzi and Laozi in this land. People everywhere lecture and read scriptures and treatises but cannot recognize the ten contemplations when facing the words. If they wish to learn the path, they have no skillful means at all. This is truly lamentable.

It is like knowing only how to milk but not how to churn and agitate milk into curds and ghee. If one knows the ten meanings, all four Lesser Vehicle gateways can use them to enter truth and all four Great Vehicle gateways to enter the real. Once one has entered the real, it is like eating milk gruel and needing nothing further. One may receive half or all of a wish-fulfilling jewel and wish to give it to all sentient beings, yet if beings refuse to value the path over bodily life, refuse diligent cultivation, and will neither receive nor use it, what benefit comes from giving in vain? Zhiyi voices regret over this. Even without immediate benefit, the teaching can still plant the cause of the poisoned drum. Those who wish to know the ten contemplations fully should consult the Mohe Zhiguan.

14. Judging Coarse and Wondrous through Access and What Is Accessed

The third major division explains the coarse and wondrous among the gateways in two parts: first, judging coarse and wondrous through what gives access and what is accessed; second, judging coarse and wondrous through the gateways themselves.

Access and what is accessed form four propositions. The gateway is what gives access, and principle is what is accessed: in one case both are coarse; in another, access is wondrous while what is accessed is coarse; in another, access is coarse while what is accessed is wondrous; and in another, both are wondrous.

The four Tripiṭaka gateways support concrete matters and are shallow and near, so what gives access is coarse. They express only partial truth, so what is accessed is likewise coarse. The four Shared gateways are the Great Vehicle’s embodiment of dharmas, truthful and skillful in crossing, so what gives access is wondrous. Yet the three vehicles each realize partial truth, and what is accessed remains coarse. The four Distinct gateways belong to skillful means of the teaching-path, so what gives access is coarse. They express entry into perfect truth, and what is accessed is wondrous. The four Perfect gateways teach truly from the realization-path, so what gives access is wondrous. They are perfect immediately in present matters, and what is accessed is wondrous as well.

Considering the four flavors again, in the raw-ghee teaching both what gives access and what is accessed carry the coarse. In the milk teaching neither carries the coarse. In the refined-ghee teaching what is accessed carries the coarse while what gives access does not. The Perfect Teaching receiving the Shared and receiving the Distinct, together with the gateways in the Nirvāṇa Sūtra, have access that carries the coarse while what is accessed does not.

15. Questions and Answers on “One Gateway, and Moreover Narrow”

Someone asks: the sutra says, “There is only one gateway, and moreover it is narrow.” Is it called one and narrow because it is coarse, or because it is wondrous?

The answer is that this meaning applies broadly and cannot be confined to a single kind of gateway. The four Tripiṭaka gateways are called four because they are taught differently in response to faculties; they are called one because all are the Buddha’s teaching. They are called four because each has different skillful means; they are called one because all face nirvāṇa. They are called four because what is accessed follows what gives access; they are called one because what gives access converges upon what is accessed. The absence of bodhi from the words is narrowness in teaching. A constricted path that cannot admit two people side by side is narrowness in practice. The difficulty with which the gateways of teaching and practice grasp and accord with truth is narrowness in principle.

The Shared Teaching is the same. It is four because it is taught separately in response to different conditions and one because all are the Buddha’s teaching. It is four because the contemplations differ and one because all face nonarising. It is four because what is accessed follows what gives access and one because what gives access follows and converges upon what is accessed. In the Shared Teaching, present matters are immediately true and the words already contain bodhi. Wholesome and unwholesome are both contemplated as unattainable, allowing them to travel side by side. The Shared Teaching is therefore not called narrow in teaching or practice through this meaning; it is called narrow in principle only because teaching and contemplation have difficulty grasping and according with true principle.

The four Distinct gateways are the same. They are four because they are taught for four kinds of faculties and one because all are the Buddha’s teaching. They are four because the contemplations for entering the real differ and one because all face the one reality. They are four because what is accessed follows what gives access and one because what gives access converges upon what is accessed. Birth-and-death is not yet immediately nirvāṇa, so teaching is narrow. Afflictions are not yet immediately bodhi, so practice is narrow. Teaching and practice have difficulty grasping and according with real principle, so principle is narrow.

The four Perfect gateways are likewise the same. They are four because they respond to four kinds of faculties and one because all are spoken by the Buddha. They are four because contemplations for entering the real differ and one because the four contemplations all face the true mark. Placing the name of the gateway on the principle makes four; having principle respond to the gateways makes one. This teaching immediately says birth-and-death is nirvāṇa, so teaching is not narrow. It immediately says afflictions are bodhi, so practice is not narrow. Yet teaching and contemplation may still fail to grasp and accord with real principle, and so principle is still called narrow.

According to the sutra’s statement “There is only one gateway, and moreover it is narrow,” the proper meaning is that gateways of teaching and practice are called narrow when they fail to grasp principle correctly. This single sentence is now opened out and takes different meanings in each place. How could one grasp a single passage as fixed? Understanding this makes coarse and wondrous clear.

16. Judging Coarse and Wondrous through the Gateways of the Four Teachings

Second, coarse and wondrous are judged through the gateways themselves.

The Four Gateways of the Tripiṭaka Teaching

All four Tripiṭaka gateways give access. When any is grasped, all four obstruct. Judged through success and failure, they have no fixed ranking and cannot be judged partially.

If only the gateway-Dharma itself is considered, the gateway of existence adheres to conventional truth and enters the path clumsily, while the gateway of emptiness lies close to true truth and enters skillfully. Thus the meaning cited from the Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom is: “The emptiness of sentient beings is taught for people of dull faculties; the emptiness of dharmas is taught for those of sharp faculties.” The gateway both existent and nonexistent is skillful relative to the first two, but clumsy relative to the final gateway. The gateway neither existent nor nonexistent is skillful. The treatise further says, “A person who is half in existence and half in nonexistence is called dull.” This judges coarse and wondrous according to the Dharmas of the four gateways.

If suitability to faculties is considered, when faculties are suited to the gateway of existence, that gateway succeeds and the other three fail. When suited to the gateway of emptiness, that gateway succeeds and the other three fail. When suited to the gateway both existent and nonexistent or neither existent nor nonexistent, each is judged successful or failed in the same way.

If a single gateway’s possession of the four siddhāntas is considered, completely attaining all four is called success and losing them is called failure. Still within the same gateway, according with desire is gain and going against the person’s disposition is loss; meeting what is suitable is gain and not meeting it is loss; treating the illness is gain and failing to treat it is loss; seeing ultimate meaning is gain and failing to see ultimate meaning is loss. Each gateway can have success or failure, and coarse and wondrous are discussed accordingly.

The ten contemplations provide a further judgment: an object of causes and conditions that is right is gain, while a deviant object is loss; genuinely arousing resolve is gain, while insincere resolve is loss; settling the mind properly is gain, while concentration and wisdom out of balance is loss; pervasively breaking through dharmas is gain, while incomplete breaking is loss; knowing passage and obstruction is gain, while not knowing them is loss; and so forth through not producing Dharma attachment to what accords with the path as gain and producing it as loss. If all ten Dharmas in one gateway are accomplished, that gateway is wondrous and the others coarse. If another gateway accomplishes all ten while this one does not, this gateway is coarse and the other wondrous.

The Four Gateways of the Shared Teaching

The principle accessed by the Shared Teaching is only one. Because that one principle cannot be spoken, how could characteristics be compared as coarse or wondrous? Yet among gateways taught in response to faculties, there can still be superiority and inferiority; the depth of the four gateways may be judged as in the Tripiṭaka Teaching.

Within each gateway, teaching that meets faculties through the four siddhāntas is called wondrous, while going against the four kinds of faculties is coarse. When each proposition in the ten contemplations of a gateway is cultivated appropriately, the gateway is wondrous; when each misses its place, the gateway is coarse. When coarse, one is burned by the fire on the four sides of prajñā and cannot enter the cooling pool. The opposite is called wondrous.

The Four Gateways of the Distinct Teaching

If only Dharma characteristics are discussed, the gateway of existence adheres to matters and is therefore coarser, while the gateway of emptiness lies close to principle and is more wondrous. The gateway of emptiness preserves only a single principle and is therefore coarse relative to the gateway both empty and existent, which penetrates both. The gateway both empty and existent still preserves both extremes and is therefore coarse relative to the gateway neither empty nor existent, which relinquishes both.

When faculties and conditions are considered, the gateways cannot be fixed in that order. When a being’s desires correspond to the gateway of existence, that gateway is wondrous and the other three coarse. When the gateway of existence fits what is suitable, it is wondrous and the others coarse. When it counteracts the relevant evil, it is wondrous and the others coarse. When it enables the person to see ultimate meaning, it is wondrous and the others coarse. The gateways of emptiness, both emptiness and existence, and neither emptiness nor existence are judged in the same way according to their own desires, suitability, counteraction, and ultimate meaning.

The ten contemplations are next illustrated through the sweet Zhentoujia fruit and poisonous Jialuojia fruit. Recognizing the object of true, good, and wondrous form in the gateway of existence is called Zhentoujia; failing to recognize the object is called Jialuojia. Genuinely arousing resolve is Zhentoujia; incorrect resolve is Jialuojia. Settling the mind through concentration and wisdom is Zhentoujia; failing to settle in the two Dharmas is Jialuojia. Pervasively breaking through dharmas is Zhentoujia; incomplete breaking is Jialuojia. Skillfully discerning passage and obstruction is Zhentoujia; failing to discern them is Jialuojia.

Cultivating the thirty-seven factors of the path is Zhentoujia; failing to cultivate them is Jialuojia. Skillfully understanding counteractives is Zhentoujia; failing to understand them is Jialuojia. Clearly knowing the stages is Zhentoujia; failing to recognize them is Jialuojia. Enduring without being moved is Zhentoujia; failing to endure is Jialuojia. Freedom from Dharma attachment that accords with the path is Zhentoujia; the arising of such attachment is Jialuojia.

The root treatise says that the Jialuojia fruit has nine parts while the Zhentoujia fruit has only one. When all ten contemplations are accomplished, there are ten parts Zhentoujia and all ten are wondrous. When nine parts are Jialuojia, the Jialuojia is coarse; when one part is Zhentoujia, the Zhentoujia is wondrous. A thousand pounds of layered blossoms do not equal one ounce of real gold, and coarse and wondrous may therefore be judged in this way. The gateway of existence is so; the other three gateways are likewise judged through the success or failure of their ten contemplations.

The Four Gateways of the Perfect Teaching

All four Perfect gateways are wondrous and none coarse. The gateway of existence is the Dharma realm and encompasses all inconceivable dharmas; it is immediately all dharmas, much more the other three gateways. The gateway of emptiness is likewise the Dharma realm and encompasses all dharmas, much more the other three. The gateways both empty and existent and neither empty nor existent are the same. Dharma characteristics are equal, with no fixed superiority or inferiority.

If the four gateways are equal, why are there four? The Buddha gives four teachings only in accord with sentient beings’ faculties, like four fingers pointing toward one moon: the moon is one, while the fingers are four.

Sentient beings have cultivated these four gateways lifetime after lifetime and formed dispositions through them. In the past they investigated principle within the four gateways and wished to overturn ignorance, thereby forming wisdom dispositions. In the past they cultivated goodness within the four gateways and wished to overturn unwholesome karma, thereby forming meritorious dispositions. The conditions of merit and wisdom produce present name, form, contact, and feeling, and each person then gives rise to craving and grasping according to the gateway formerly cultivated. Through these ten dharmas, they become sentient beings with dispositions for the Perfect Teaching.

Sentient beings’ desires differ, as do what suits them and what must be treated. Buddha-wisdom illuminates clearly and discerns faculties without error. Through the worldly siddhānta, the Buddha responds to four kinds of disposition and desire by teaching four gateways. Through the individually adapted siddhānta, he gives rise to four kinds of goodness. Through the counteractive siddhānta, he treats four kinds of attachment. Through the siddhānta of ultimate meaning, he enables four kinds of person to see principle. Without these four kinds of condition, the Buddha does not teach the corresponding Dharma. Because conditions are not one, they are summarized as four. All four gateways straightforwardly set aside skillful means and teach only the unsurpassed path. Their characteristics perfectly interpenetrate, and all four are wondrous.

Coarse and wondrous can be judged further through the gateways of teaching. If the intent of the four siddhāntas is not understood, treatises contend against one another; who can integrate them? For example, the Treatise on the Grounds split into southern and northern paths, and later the Mahāyānasaṃgraha tradition arose. Each regarded itself as true and rejected the others, seeking to place opponents in defeat. Without the intent of the four siddhāntas, all four gateways fail.

Although the Perfect gateways interpenetrate purely and their teaching is open and profound, if one cannot use them to resolve scriptural and treatise disputes, why does contention continue? If one truly wishes to enter the path, what gateway cannot give access? On awakening to principle, why preserve attachment to four? During cultivation, why allow any gateway to obstruct? Yet the four forms of obstruction differ in weight.

The Distinct gateways are separated from one another. Those who have awakened do not conflict, but those who have not easily contend, and their attachment is heavy, like a dull horse that moves only after a painful blow. The Perfect gateways are open and profound; before awakening, attachment to them is lighter, like a swift horse that moves on seeing the shadow of the whip. Even if such light attachment has not gained the benefit of ultimate meaning, it does not lose the benefits of the worldly, individually adapted, and counteractive siddhāntas. Thus the treatise says all four siddhāntas are real and not false.

Why are they all real? The worldly siddhānta is real within worldly conditions, and so forth through the siddhānta of ultimate meaning, which is real when ultimate meaning is seen. Though all are real, reality has depths. From another perspective, they can all be false. Taking the gateway of existence as an example, the worldly siddhānta is real for corresponding desires and false for other desires. The individually adapted siddhānta is real when it produces goodness in the corresponding person and false in other situations. The counteractive siddhānta is real when it breaks the corresponding evil and false for other illnesses. The siddhānta of ultimate meaning is real when it enables the corresponding person to see principle and false for other functions. The other three gateways are the same.

Within the gateway of existence, the worldly, individually adapted, and counteractive siddhāntas are real in worldly establishments and false from the standpoint of ultimate meaning. The siddhānta of ultimate meaning is real in ultimate meaning and false in worldly establishment. The real side is called wondrous and the false side coarse. The other gateways may be distinguished broadly by analogy.

17. Judging Coarse and Wondrous through the Five Flavors

When the preceding coarse and wondrous are placed within the five flavors, the milk teaching has eight gateways, four coarse and four wondrous, while all the principles accessed are wondrous. The curds teaching has four gateways; the gateways are coarse and the principle accessed is also coarse. The raw-ghee teaching has sixteen gateways, twelve coarse and four wondrous; two kinds of principle accessed are coarse and two wondrous. The refined-ghee teaching has twelve gateways, eight coarse and four wondrous; one kind of principle accessed is coarse and one wondrous. The Lotus Sutra has only four gateways, all wondrous, and its one principle accessed is likewise wondrous.

Before the Lotus Sutra, the gateways giving access and principles accessed by śrāvakas were coarse. At the Lotus, both gateway and principle interpenetrate and become wondrous. Bodhisattvas are not fixed: some already made gateway and principle interpenetrate as wondrous during the vaipulya or prajñā teachings, while those of the dullest faculties remained like the two vehicles until the Lotus.

The Nirvāṇa Sūtra has sixteen gateways, twelve coarse and four wondrous, while all principles accessed are wondrous. Why? The earlier gateways each led through coarse or wondrous gateways to corresponding coarse or wondrous principles and still preserved principles of skillful means. The Nirvāṇa Sūtra instead teaches that all dharmas possess the nature of peace and happiness and all sentient beings possess buddha-nature. No separate principle of skillful means remains, but only one wondrous principle. Yet coarse gateways are preserved as skillful means for that wondrous principle, and all gateways are taught to enter the real.

It is like a brahman asking the Buddha: if the cause is impermanent, why is the fruit permanent? The Buddha answers by questioning him in return. From this one knows that the hundred rivers finally enter the sea and all gateways converge upon the real. Real principle is most urgent and must therefore interpenetrate; yet coarse skillful means are retained to draw in people of dull faculties.

The Lotus Sutra uses subduing to break gateways and principles of skillful means, like the Golden-Sand River with no further bend. The Nirvāṇa Sūtra instead embraces and again permits gateways of skillful means, drawing people in according to different conditions. The establishments of preserving and retiring differ, but the Golden-Sand River and the hundred rivers all finally return to the sea, and the real principle to which they return does not differ.

18. Opening Coarse Gateways to Reveal Wondrous Gateways

The fourth major division opens coarse gateways to reveal wondrous gateways.

Someone asks: the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā first teaches Great Vehicle gateways and later gateways of the two vehicles. Why does the present treatise first teach Lesser Vehicle gateways and later Great Vehicle gateways?

The answer is that the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā addressed fixed diseases of views among people of its time and therefore first used Great Vehicle emptiness to sweep away views, then revealed gateways through which śrāvakas enter truth. The present sutra addresses sentient beings who no longer have that disease of views but remain in the thatched hut and refuse to advance. It must therefore open gateways of skillful means and reveal the perfectly interpenetrating true mark, first listing lesser gateways and then clarifying greater ones. Opening and breaking must each suit the time; both orders have their excellence.

Teachings after the Lotus Sutra do not await further opening. Among teachings before the Lotus, if gateway and principle have already entered the wondrous, what remains to be opened? Sometimes gateway and principle are wondrous while the person is not yet wondrous; in that case the person is opened. Since the gateway and principle themselves are already wondrous, they need no further opening. Whatever gateway, principle, or person is not yet wondrous is what is opened now.

All craving, views, and afflictions are opened and revealed as bodhi; thus the sutra says, “Contemplate all dharmas as empty, as the true mark.” All birth-and-death is opened and revealed as nirvāṇa; thus it says, “The characteristics of the world constantly abide.” All ordinary beings are opened and revealed as wondrous persons; thus it says, “All sentient beings are my children.”

All discourse born of craving and views is opened and revealed as the Buddha-Dharma; thus it says, “Even secular scriptures and writings, livelihood and productive activity, are not contrary to the true mark.” All sentient beings are opened and revealed as wondrous principle; thus it says, “To enable sentient beings to open the Buddha’s knowing-and-seeing; revealing, awakening to, and entering are likewise the same.”

All Lesser Vehicle Dharmas are opened and revealed as wondrous Dharma; thus it says, “It definitively resolves the Dharma of the śrāvakas and is king among the sutras.” All śrāvaka teaching is opened; thus it says, “In the past the Buddha disparaged śrāvakas before bodhisattvas, yet in truth the Buddha taught and transformed them through the Great Vehicle.” All śrāvaka practice is opened and revealed as wondrous practice; thus it says, “What you practice is the bodhisattva-path.” All śrāvaka principle is opened and revealed as wondrous principle; thus it says, “Opening the gateway of skillful means, it reveals the true mark.”

All bodhisattvas not yet perfected by wondrous Dharma are then opened so that all now attain the Perfect. Thus the sutra says, “When bodhisattvas hear this Dharma, the net of their doubts is entirely removed.” There is one kind of bodhisattva in the Distinct Teaching, one in the Tripiṭaka Teaching, and one in the Shared Teaching. All who had not previously been definitively resolved now receive opening and revelation.

Thus no gateway and no principle fails to enter the wondrous. This is called opening the provisional to reveal the real, deciding the coarse and making it wondrous.

義疏Exposition

這是一篇由智者講說、灌頂筆錄而成的長章。全章不把『門』停在名相分類,而是一路追問:門通向哪裡,人如何由門而入,什麼使門成為障礙,什麼又使麁門得以開顯。教門與行門由此連成一條從聞法到證體的路。

〔科§01〕教與行:登臨實相的飛梯

實相幽微深遠,好比絕壑難登;教與行就是跨越深谷的飛梯。教讓人知道道路,行使人真正登臨。佛教之門能使人出三界苦,佛子行道又能在來世成佛,兩句分別從教與行顯示『門』的功能:門不等於目的地,卻真能使人通達目的地。

論主先把全章展成四步:看門相、修入門觀、辨麁妙、作開顯。這四步也形成內在次第。若不知道門相,修觀沒有入口;若只知入口而不辨麁妙,門可能反成執著;辨明成壞之後,才能使尚未入妙的人、法、門、理一同開顯。

〔科§02〕四句只是門,實相不被四句占有

佛法不可用言語直接展示,佛仍須順應因緣,用有、無、亦有亦無、非有非無四句詮理。四句的價值在能通,不在把實相切成四塊。實相尚且不可固定為一,更不會真有四個實相;四只是四種入口。

清涼池之譬說,利根能入,鈍根亦入;不只定者,散心者、專志者、精進者也都能由門而入。大火之譬又把得失說得更深:火不被抓取時,可以暖身熟食;伸手取火,反被火燒。四門本為通般若、除煩惱、辦大事;一旦取著,門便化為邪見之火。善用門不是棄門,而是在運用中不把門相握成實體。

教與行同樣依根性開合。有人聞教如快馬見鞭影,立即入路;有人修觀如夜見電光,當下見道;也有人先聞後觀,或先觀後聞。信行與法行因此可以互轉,教可成觀的入口,觀也可回過頭照明所聞之教。四類教法各具四門,先成十六;教、觀合論,大數成三十二;再細看善知識、眾生身因與無量觀行,門其實不可勝數。喜見城有一千二百門,實相法城更不會只容一軌。

〔科§03〕三藏四門:同一四諦,四種入真

三藏有門從正因緣立有。生死不是世性、微塵或父母所造,而由無明引生行、煩惱、業、苦。苦、集、道、滅都可依有而說:有為無常苦空無我,修道生無漏,斷煩惱種子與果報二縛而得有餘、無餘涅槃。從有見道,便是有門。

空門把正因緣中的假與實分析至空平等,由空發無漏、見法身。須菩提在石室觀生滅無常而入空,正顯空能為門;至於申明此門的論書,原文自己保留『恐』字,語氣並不決定。

亦有亦空門看見因緣既有又空,以此破對有、無任何一邊的偏執;非有非無門則雙離有無兩邊。迦旃延與車匿的入道故事,分別顯示後兩門的功能。第四門末又記一種阿毘曇說,把我安在第五不可說藏,既非三世之有,也非無為之無;論主對此同樣保留未定之意。四門各有論說傳承,所通都是偏真。

〔科§04〕通教四門:鏡像六分,當體即空

三藏析色入空,好比把實人之頭析成六分,逐分求人才知不可得;通教則如看鏡像,頭等六分顯現的當下就是空,不待析盡。疊與空相即的短句,正用來標示體法異於析法。

這裡眾生空與法空不再前後隔開:眾生空就是法空,法空就是眾生空,如色性與我性同如幻化。『常性空』又表明,法不是經檢驗後才臨時變空,而是從來沒有一刻不以空為性;水月、鏡像既顯現而不可得,正好承載這一層意思。

四門便在幻化上建立。幻化業果乃至涅槃宛然顯現,是有門;幻本無實、求不可得,是空門;如鏡像可見而不可得見,是亦空亦有門;連幻有、幻空都不可握持,雙捨兩邊,是非空非有門。三乘根性不同,各從相應一句入第一義;同入即空,並不抹去三乘各自的行果。

〔科§05〕別教四門的歷別與圓門的初標

別教向下不同三藏、通教,向上又不同圓教;它以歷別次第入中。經中散說的乳、金、額珠、虛空等譬,被論主收束為四門。乳中有酪、石中有金、額中有珠,顯有門;石無金性、乳無酪性、佛性如虛空,顯空門;乳中既有酪性也無酪性,顯亦有亦無門;佛性為中道,乳中非有酪性亦非無酪性,顯雙非之門。

這些譬讓別教菩薩由門見佛性、住大涅槃;同一語句在別處也可能承載圓意,所以門名並不獨自決定所屬。圓教四門在此只先標出:它和別門初看名義相同,細究卻另有融、不融等多重差別,須到後文十重簡別才顯全貌。

〔科§06〕所通是一,能通有巧拙偏直

入門之處說所通,入門之觀說能入。十六教門所通,先收成偏真、圓真兩理。三藏、通教八門同入偏真:三藏析法,紆迴隘陋,如州城四面偏門;通教體法,寬直巧度,如四面直門。偏直雖成八門,城中使君只有一人,所通偏真不二。

別教、圓教八門同入圓真:別門偏而未融,如帝城偏門;圓門圓而且融,如帝城直門。門路有八,帝尊不二,所通圓真也只有一。州城、帝城,使君、帝尊,各守自己的譬體,顯示能通的差別與所通的一致。

小乘只立一組四門,大乘卻有三組四門,因小家與大家深廣不同:大家通處長遠,千門萬戶也不足為多。大乘通門又像王國通門,正通朝士,也兼容朝市;平民從此出入,不會使它變成平民專門。大乘門正通實相,傍通偏真,三乘兼由此門灰斷,也不使它降成小乘門。

〔科§07〕三藏有門十觀:由正因緣走到法愛不生

聞法立悟的信行人,心根疾利,得道方法難以展示;論主因此就法行人,把散在阿毘曇中的修道骨架撮成十項:識境、發心、安心、破遍、通塞、道品、對治、次位、安忍、法愛不生。十項像一條貫穿始終的路,使行者不再迷於岔道。

第一要守正因緣境。把苦樂歸給毘紐天、世性或微塵,是邪因;說一切自然如此,是無因。鄰虛的有無之爭仍可能落在二見;正觀則見麁細、因緣、苦集、依正都無常無主,由無明顛倒造作。第二由此厭離無明所轉的火輪,清淨發起二乘出離心,不雜名利,不再增長苦集。

第三以五停心之定、四念處之慧調適安心。數息從一到十而知念念生滅;不淨觀若生瞋,便以慈心調和;因緣觀橫見四生、豎見三界皆從緣生;障起時念佛。定慧如賢人智德雙具,偏定如多德少智,偏慧如多智少德,終究不能稱賢。外道不知鑽搖,乳漿尚且難得,酪蘇更無從成辦。

第四用無常遍破諸見。常、無常、亦常亦無常、非常非無常,都是法塵對意根而生;既從緣生,就可由無常破除。第五在諸見中辨通塞:八十八使是塞,道滅是通;執自己的見為實,愛潤成業果,是塞;知見無常而不取著,無業無果而有道滅,是通。蟲食木偶成字形,蟲卻不知字與非字,正反照不識通塞之失。

第六由身、受、心、法四念處展開四正勤、四如意足、五根、五力、七覺分、八正道,合成三十七道品;再以苦下二行、集道諸行與滅下四行,分通涅槃城的三解脫門。第七在正慧力弱時,以十二禪等作援:貪欲用不淨、背捨,所緣不自在用勝處,不廣普用一切處,福少用無量心,欲出色界用四空。

第八明辨賢聖真似,不讓增上慢冒充聖位。第九由別相轉總相,安忍內外遮障,使煗、頂、忍相續;煗如近道之煙,頂若不能忍便退回此邊。第十在四善根生後不愛著順道法;法愛雖不使人立刻退成重罪,卻會遮住見諦。滅愛而發苦忍真明,才能成初果、超果乃至無學。

五百阿羅漢所造論正申有門得道,因而四門都不只是調心方便。門若調適,都可得道;門若被取著,都成障礙。般若方便使人不墮有無,十觀就是由有門直入偏真的完整方便;其餘三門各有大同小異的十觀,也同斷三界惑。

〔科§08〕通教十觀:幻化而修,無所得而入

通教有門仍具十觀,十項全在幻化上展開。所觀諸法如幻;三乘發心大體相同而有小異。聲聞、緣覺同樣由般若得解脫涅槃道,顯示大乘門正通實相而可旁通三乘,並不需要另造一種身分來解釋。

定慧不可得,仍以定慧安心;四見、六十二見與一切法如幻,便用幻慧遍破。幻化中的苦集是塞,道滅是通;以不可得心修三十七品,以無所治學諸對治;從乾慧地至佛地,次位分明。幻慧不受外魔動搖,也不被內障逼退;諸法不生而般若生,又不愛著般若,於是入真而得無生法忍。與析法相比,這條路的巧正落在當體如幻。

其餘三門也各具十觀。有門在此作為一門之例;省文之處,仍由同一十項貫穿修行始終。

〔科§09〕別教十觀:破穢草而顯金藏

別教有門把如來藏妙有立為所觀境。它超出凡夫、二乘與通教諸門,作一切法的依持,並由此出生一切法。眾生雖具妙有,卻像金藏被草覆、額珠在鬥爭中陷沒,又如貧窮孤兒流露在外;菩薩見此而起大慈悲,發四弘誓願,不只為一人、一國、一界微塵數人,而為法界眾生發心,聲勢如師子吼。

安心仍由定慧相資:應修定時修定,應修慧時修慧,以定愛護,以慧策進。妙有之慧遍破生死諸見,也破沉空取證;大樹不宿怨鳥,顯示涅槃之取同樣不住。雪山同時有毒草與藥王,顯示通塞須逐層辨認:六道苦集對二乘道滅,二乘苦集對菩薩道滅,菩薩苦集再對佛道滅;即使知道佛道,也明白取著佛道會重新成塞。

三十七品如菩薩寶炬。離十相入空三昧,不見空相入無相三昧,不作願求入無作三昧;常與無常、恒與非恒、安與非安、為與無為、斷與不斷、涅槃與非涅槃、增上與非增上,又成助開實相的對治門。

十信、十住、十行、十迴向、十地、等覺、妙覺,次位深淺不亂;內忍善惡兩覺與違從二賊,外忍八風,觀心不被傾動。相似法現前而不起法愛,便不墮在菩薩頂位;無此愛,才能破無明穢草、顯妙有金藏、見佛性而入實相。空、亦空亦有、非空非有三門,也各用自己的方便完成同一十觀。

〔科§10〕圓門十簡:從融到譬喻的全幅辨別

圓門即生死色為法性色,就法性色通中,顯無諍之法;別門則次第滅生死色、法性色而通中。兩者同通中道,論主用融、即法、佛智、次第、斷、位、果、詮、問答、譬喻十重展開差別。

第一看融。別門的有、空、雙亦、雙非各守當分;圓門說有不隔無,說無不隔有,有無不二,一門即其餘三門,一門無量、無量一門。真善妙有與外道性實雖可同名,實質如周璞與鄭璞,貴賤懸隔;金石相糅會使人不辨涇渭,精識四門才能辨明真偽。

融又落在破與會。只破外道而保存二乘、大乘方便,會惡法而不會二乘人,仍屬歷別。圓破從別教以下人法俱破,連草庵中人法也不固留;圓會則從不輕眾人、調達、龍女、畜生,到世間產業、二乘行與父子之譬,沒有一類人法被留在妙外。經文前後與行位又會改變融語的所屬,故融須連同所證位置而看。

第二看即法。別門在生死之外另說真善妙有,在二乘真外另說畢竟空;圓門則生死之有當下為實相之有,一切法趣有,有即法界,生死即涅槃。一門只作言端,實已圓具一切法。

第三看智慧。分別一切智、道種智而照恒沙法,是菩薩智;一切種智與五眼具足,圓照法界,是佛智。第四看行:歷階從微至著、一行不能即無量行,是次第;一切行趣一行、一行即無量行,是遍行。

第五看斷。別門漸次割截五住,顯可思議智斷;圓門明無明體本不有、解惑不二,在不斷中說斷,顯不可思議斷。智慧與煩惱、明與闇的兩組經句,使斷與無所斷同時得到位置。

第六看位。把界內見思判三十心、界外見思無明判十地,等覺後心斷盡無明,是方便位;從初發心一心修三觀,十信圓伏、四十心圓斷,直到等覺、妙覺,是實位。第七看果:法身本有、般若修成、解脫始滿,因地又各有局限,是三德縱列;三德具足、不縱不橫,一法門具一切法門,初地具諸地功德,初阿字具其餘諸字功德,是圓果。

第八看能詮。門前如何引導,門中如何詮述智、行、斷、位、果與譬,門後如何收結,三處若同以融即貫穿,才成圓詮;一門即三門也須落在整篇首尾。第九由問答反覆核徵指趣,第十看金銀寶物、如意珠、日月等譬如何與法相合。十重共同工作,圓、別才朗然可辨。

〔科§11〕今經十義:門相在全經中顯明

論主先依五味列門數,再從今經散取十義。觀一切法空、決了聲聞法、開方便門,顯融人融法;治生產業不違實相,客作人即長者子,顯即法;開示悟入佛知見,顯佛智;衣、座、室與不斷五欲而淨諸根,顯不次第行;越過五百由旬,顯不斷而斷。

五品、六根清淨與寶乘遊四方,顯實位;佛住大乘、定慧莊嚴而度眾生,顯果不縱;今佛文前合掌欲聞具足道,古佛文後說實相義已為眾人宣示,顯前後圓詮;智積、龍女顯問答;輪王頂珠與高廣寶車顯圓譬。這些證文並不聚在一段,而從不同人物、行位、事件與譬喻共同顯示圓門。

圓融四門也由經義成立。佛智慧微妙、如來智慧觀久遠如今日,是有門;一切法空、常寂滅相,是空門;諸法無性而佛種從緣起,是亦空亦有門;非如非異、非虛非實,是雙非門。四門同在一圓意中成立,又因根機而各有入口。

〔科§12〕圓門十觀:一實四諦落在現前行心

圓觀第一以一實四諦為不可思議境。生死苦即空、即假、即中,三淨一心而成大涅槃;煩惱集也即空、即假、即中,三智一心而成大般若。苦即無作滅,集即無作道,四諦互相融攝而仍可分辨。生死即空為真、即假為善、即中為妙,故有門之境名真善妙色。

第二由境起心。眾生本即大涅槃,卻顛倒以樂為苦,菩薩因此生悲,願度未度、斷未斷;煩惱本即菩提,眾生卻以道為非道,菩薩因此生慈,願知未知、得未得。慈悲無緣,誓願清淨,自然攝取眾生。

第三安心用兩組行旅譬。臨池見魚而不結網,是見境而不起行;裹糧束腳卻安坐不行,是立願而不前進。定慧又如調適陰陽、均平兩輪、具足二翼:體生死即涅槃為定,達煩惱即菩提為慧,一心巧修便具足諸行。

第四破遍如金剛斧與無翳日。分段、變易苦在生死即涅槃中破,四住、五住集在煩惱即菩提中破;能破而無固定所破。第五識通塞如主兵寶取捨得宜,強者綏之,弱者撫之。生死過患與煩惱惱亂為塞,即涅槃、即菩提為通;從外道四見到圓教四門,節節執著皆塞,節節亡執而顯妙便通,不能檢校則行與理解俱失。

第六道品從十界五陰的非淨非不淨、非常非不常,破八顛倒而立法性四念處;念處中具道品、三解脫與一切法。涅槃即生死顯四枯,生死即涅槃顯四榮,二者不二顯非枯非榮而住大涅槃。第七以即涅槃治報障,以即菩提治業障、煩惱障。

第八次位由理即、名字、觀行、相似、分真至究竟,生死即涅槃與煩惱即菩提各依六層展開。第九安忍內外強軟遮障:陰入境、病業魔禪、二乘菩薩等境,不破即涅槃之觀;諸見與增上慢,不破即菩提之觀。

第十過障之後功德生起,禪定三昧、陀羅尼無畏、般若法身都隨觀而現。相似功德最容易引生順道法愛,使人不上也不退,滯為頂墮。疾滅此愛,才破無明、開佛知見、證實相體;解脫、般若、法身三德由此具足,一身無量,如寶聚與圓珠。其餘三門也各以十觀入實。

〔科§13〕散證、牛乳與不肯受珠的人

今經對十觀的證明散在全篇。不可示、言辭寂滅與法妙難思,顯不思議境;神通、智慧引眾生住法,顯真正發心;佛住大乘、定慧莊嚴,顯安心而自成成他;破有法王與日月除暗,顯破遍;導師在險道濟眾,顯通塞;淨藏、淨眼修道品與波羅蜜,兼顯道品、對治;增道損生、遊四方,顯次位;須彌不動、著如來衣,顯安忍;聞聲不著、六根清淨與真淨大法,顯無法愛。

十觀之意也散見大小乘經論,如摩黎山純出栴檀,與外道四韋陀和莊、老所載不同。世人若只會講讀,面對文字卻不識修道方便,就像只會擠乳,不會鑽搖乳漿而製成酪蘇。四門之中識得十觀,小乘可入真,大乘可入實,如食乳糜而得飽足。

半如意珠、全如意珠本可布施一切;受者若不肯輕生重道、勤心修習,不受不用,布施眼前便無實益。論主的悲歎沒有停在失望:即使暫無所得,法音仍可作毒鼓之因,為後日破惑留下種子。

〔科§14〕能通之門與所通之理

判麁妙先要分清能與所:門是能通,理是所通。由此形成能所俱麁、能妙所麁、能麁所妙、能所俱妙四句。三藏門扶事淺近,只詮偏真,能所俱麁;通門體法巧度,能妙而三乘所證偏真仍麁;別門以教道方便詮入圓真,能麁所妙;圓門證道實說,即事而圓,能所俱妙。

放到四味中,生蘇帶麁能、麁所;乳教能所都不帶麁;熟蘇所帶麁、能不帶麁;圓接通、接別及涅槃諸門,能帶麁而所不帶麁。這一重先把門路與目的地拆開,使後文不以門名直接代替所證之理。

〔科§15〕一門狹小:四教各有教、行、理

經說一門狹小,論主以問答把一句拓開。三藏四門因應機、方便、能通而有四,因同是佛教、同向涅槃、同會所通而為一;文字中無菩提,是教狹小;隘路不容二人並行,是行狹小;教行取真難契,是理狹小。

通教也因應機、觀法、能所而四而一。即事而真,文字中已有菩提;善惡皆觀不可得,可以並行,故教與行不以此義為狹;取無生真理難當,狹落在理。

別教為四機說而四,同是佛教而一;入實觀異而四,同向一實而一;所隨能而四,能會所而一。生死尚未即涅槃,故教狹;煩惱尚未即菩提,故行狹;取理難當,故理狹。

圓教同樣因四機、四觀而四,因佛說、實理而一。生死即涅槃,教不狹;煩惱即菩提,行不狹;教觀取理仍可能不當,故理仍有狹小之名。『一門』與『狹小』因此不是固定貼在某一教,而要沿教、行、理三層,看門如何應機、如何向實、如何取理。

〔科§16〕門因契機而妙,也因執著而麁

三藏四門都是能通。執著任何一門,四門都可壅塞;調適得宜,四門都可得道。只從法相看,有門附俗而拙,空門傍真而巧,雙亦比前巧、比雙非拙;從根性看,適合有門則有門成、其餘三門壞,適合任何一門也都如此。

四悉檀把成壞說得更細:順欲或乖情,合宜或不宜,能治病或不能治病,見第一義或不見第一義,分別構成得失。十觀也逐項檢驗:境正、心真、安心調、破法遍、知通塞,乃至法愛不生,十項成就的門為妙;十項失所的門為麁。

通教所通一理不可形比,麁妙落在赴機與修行。每門能會四種根機、十觀句句得所,便妙;乖機失觀,便被四邊火燒,不能入清涼池。

別教若就法相排次,有附事而空傍理,單空又不及雙通,雙存又不及雙捨;若就根緣,四門各可因稱欲、合宜、治惡、見理而妙,也可因相反而麁。鎮頭迦、迦羅迦兩果把十觀成失逐項照出:識真善妙色境、正發心、定慧安心、破法遍、識通塞、修道品、解對治、知次位、安忍、無順道愛,是甘果;十項相反,是毒果。

本論以毒果九分、甘果一分說多失少得;十觀全成,便十分甘果、十觀皆妙。九分毒果雖多,仍麁;一分甘果雖少,仍妙,如千斤疊華不及一兩真金。每一門都由自己的十觀成失判斷,數目與物象共同服務於正邪成壞。

圓教四門法相平等,全都妙。有門、空門、雙亦、雙非各是法界,各攝一切法;四門差別只由根機而立,如四指指一月,月一而指四。眾生過去在四門推理、修善,形成慧與福德根性;今生又依本習起愛取,欲樂、所宜、所治各異。佛明鑒根機,以世界赴四欲,以為人生四善,以對治治四執,以第一義令四人見理;四緣具足,四門皆成正直之道。

教門上的成失也同此。不得四悉檀意,各家就會像南北二道與後起諸說一般,各自謂真、互相排斥,四門俱失。圓門虛通融淨,應能消解經論諍競;悟理之時不存四執,修行之時門門可通。別門之執重,如鈍馬須痛手才行;圓門之執輕,如快馬見鞭影即去。未得第一義時,仍可保有前三悉檀之利。

四悉檀都可在相應因緣中真實,也都可在不相應處成虛。世界、為人、對治對世間施設是真,對第一義仍虛;第一義對所見實理是真,對世界施設仍虛。實的一面為妙,虛的一面為麁,故麁妙始終是契機、得益與成觀的活判,不是門名的靜態次序。

〔科§17〕五味之中,存門與廢門各有因緣

把麁妙放到五味,數目一一分明:乳教八門,四麁四妙,所通俱妙;酪教四門,門理俱麁;生蘇十六門,十二麁四妙,兩所麁、兩所妙;熟蘇十二門,八麁四妙,一理麁、一理妙;法華四門全妙,一理也妙。

聲聞人在法華以前門理俱麁,到此門理融妙。菩薩根性不定,有的已在方等、般若時融妙,極鈍者仍待法華。涅槃有十六門,十二麁四妙,所通俱妙;因一切法有安樂性、一切眾生有佛性,所通只是一妙理,而仍保存麁門作接引方便。

法華折伏,破權門理,如金沙大河再無迴曲;涅槃攝受,再許權門,如百川各流而同歸大海。金沙著眼直往無曲,百川著眼異流同歸;存門、廢門之施設不同,歸實之海沒有兩個。

〔科§18〕開的是未妙的人、法、教、行與理

末段先問:為何《中論》先明大乘門、後明二乘門,本章卻先小後大?答案落在時機。《中論》面對的是已成的見病,先以大法掃蕩,再示入真之門;今經面對的是安住草庵的人,須先列小門,再開方便而示圓實。次序不同,各自切中病機。

法華以後無須再開;法華以前,門理已妙者也無所更開。門理雖妙而人未妙,開就在其人;若門、理、人仍未妙,便一一開之。

愛見煩惱開為菩提,生死開為涅槃,凡夫開為妙人,愛見言教開為佛法,一切眾生開為妙理。小乘法開為妙法,聲聞教開為大乘教化,聲聞行開為菩薩道,聲聞理開為真實相;三藏、通、別三類尚未決了的菩薩,也都開而得圓。

於是開顯不只改一個名目,而使法、教、行、理與承受它們的人全都得到安置。凡未妙者入妙,門與理無不融通;這就是開權顯實,使麁得到決了而成妙。

釋籤之眼

湛然在《法華玄義釋籤》(T1717)中,先把本章分成來意與正開章解釋,又明判十六門全是入實之門〔0937a21–a26〕。這一眼先穩住全章方向:四句、四教、十六門雖有巧拙、偏圓、融隔之別,功能上都以通達為門;門的得失取決於是否契機、是否成觀、是否生著。

第二眼分教與行。湛然說行就是觀〔0937b10〕,使『教門』與『行門』既能相資又不混同。聞教立悟、修觀得入、由聞轉觀、由觀轉聞,都是根性不同的通路;教觀合成三十二只是大數,不能把無量善知識與無量觀行關閉在固定名目中。

第三眼分處與觀。『處論所通,觀論能入』〔0938a14〕,使州城、帝城二譬得到清楚位置:偏門、直門說能通之路,使君、帝尊說所通之理。前八門同通偏真,後八門同通圓真;門路分八,所至不二。

第四眼看省文。本章以教相為重,所以藏、通、別、圓各多展一門,餘三門依所展一門準例;湛然明說觀法在此存略,完整廣說另見《摩訶止觀》(T1911)〔0938a22–a26〕。省略是文體取捨,不是觀項缺失;每門仍須以境、發心、安心、破遍、通塞、道品、對治、次位、安忍、離愛貫穿始終。

第五眼落在別圓十簡。湛然指出前七意各有三段〔0939b05〕:先正辨該義,再判別圓,還須從經文前後與行位辨歸屬。融、即法、佛智、次第、斷、位、果都不能單抓一句定性;第八圓詮更把門前引導、門中詮述、門後收結連成整體,第九問答、第十譬喻再作核驗。

第六眼照一實四諦。湛然以現前一念具十界苦集〔0940c03〕,說明苦集不是遠處抽象類目。苦、集、道、滅相即,仍各有可辨之相;正因相即,發心、定慧、破遍、通塞、道品、對治、次位、安忍與離愛才都能在現前心上實修。

第七眼看經證的散布。《摩訶止觀》集中以大車顯觀,本章則散引《妙法蓮華經》一部〔0941a23–a26〕。不可示、佛住大乘、導師濟難、六根清淨等文分散各品,論主依功能撮成十觀;它們共同成鏡,不必被重排成一段連續經文。

第八眼重判麁妙。湛然以『四門是教,十觀是行』〔0942a21〕總括後半章。門法的巧拙只是第一層,還要看四悉檀是否契合根機、十觀是否句句得所。於是同一門可因執著成塞,也可因得宜成通;鎮頭迦、迦羅迦之譬,正把成失逐項落在修行上。

第九眼辨存廢。法華折伏,如金沙大河直往無曲;涅槃攝受,如百川異流同歸。湛然所照的不是兩種互斥終點,而是同一實理前的兩種接引:一處破除對權門理的固守,一處為鈍根保存可入之門,歸海不二。

最後一眼看開顯的對象。湛然把正開分為凡夫、二乘、菩薩三類〔0943b07〕,二乘又開所詮法、能詮教、所行之行與所契之理。開顯因此不是把一個抽象名詞改寫,而是逐層使未妙的人、法、教、行、理入妙。這也把全章收回開頭:飛梯的價值,正在確實把人帶過絕壑。

這面鏡也保留著作層次。本章跨卷八、卷九,卷題與『天台智者大師說』把前後接成同一講說;正文沒有另標灌頂私釋。因而十八科的主聲始終是智者說法,灌頂以筆錄保存其層層問答、引經與譬喻。卷次分界是傳本關節,不是義理突然換人。

四教之眼又比門名更細。三藏門先以生滅四諦立四句,通門以幻化即空重立四句;別門多取乳、金、珠、虛空等譬顯歷別,圓門則到後文以十簡證明一門不隔餘門。四套名稱相似,所觀境、所破惑、所通理與行位各有差別;『皆為實門』說的是能通功能,不是把義相磨成相同。

藏門十觀在鏡中逐項有科。正境排除邪因與無因,安心以五停、四念調定慧,破遍用無常掃諸見,通塞辨八十八使與道滅,道品通三解脫,助道對應障病,次位防增上慢,安忍令煗頂相續,離愛才入見諦。十項不是散列德目,而是一條前項支持後項的行程。

圓門通塞的主兵寶譬,在湛然手中更顯操作性:強塞須止而退,弱通須安而進〔0940c28–0941a05〕。這一判使『取捨得宜』不只停在安撫語氣,而落在每一節觀心的進退。外道四見乃至圓門,一有執著即塞;通達而仍失其妙,也會亡失重寶。

道品的枯榮譬也由鏡中分層。涅槃即生死顯枯,生死即涅槃顯榮,二者不二顯非枯非榮;三層共同安立一實諦,而沒有把樹木拆成另一張數目配表。接著助道、次位、安忍、離愛各守所在,圓融不會吞沒修行次第。

判麁妙時,湛然把門、四悉檀、根性與十觀串成四層。門法可有巧拙,機感可有稱乖,四悉可有得失,十觀可有成壞;任何一層失所,都可能使妙名成塞。反之,麁名之門若契欲、合宜、治病、見理,又能完成十觀,也真有通達之功。

鎮頭迦與迦羅迦一段,鏡中先以林譬寺、果譬僧,再移果譬照十觀正邪〔0942b14–c06〕。本章九分毒、一分甘的數字,正用來凸顯多失不及少得;甘果一分仍勝毒果九分,如一兩真金勝千斤疊華。數與譬都指向成觀,不另成立門名高下。

五味之眼則同時看門的存廢與所通之理。法華折伏,使迂曲權執不再回轉;涅槃攝受,為鈍根重開可行之門。金沙與百川各顯一面,一直一攝而同歸實海。由此回看全章,開顯不是毀棄過去一切方便,而是讓方便不再被執為終點。

《摩訶止觀》把十觀廣開為行法,《妙法蓮華經文句》(T1718)使本章散取的人物、品段與譬喻各歸經文脈絡〔T34 0077c15/0117a04〕;本章則以教相為軸,把門、觀、麁妙、開顯連成一篇。三部互照時,各有自己的著述任務:行法得以展開,經文得以定位,玄義則顯示一切門如何通向經體。

This is a long unit taught by Zhiyi and recorded by Guanding. It does not leave “gateway” as a classification of terms, but continually asks: What does a gateway lead to? How does a person enter through it? What turns a gateway into an obstruction? What allows a coarse gateway to be opened and revealed? Gateways of teaching and practice thereby join in a single path from hearing the Dharma to realizing the sutra’s substance.

〔Section §01〕 Teaching and Practice: The Flying Ladder for Reaching the True Mark

The true mark is subtle, hidden, profound, and far-reaching, like an impassable ravine difficult to climb. Teaching and practice are the flying ladder that crosses it. Teaching lets one know the route; practice enables one actually to climb. The gateway of the Buddha’s teaching lets one leave the suffering of the three realms, while children of the Buddha who practice the path can become buddhas in a future life. These two sentences show the function of a gateway respectively through teaching and practice: the gateway is not the destination, yet it truly can bring someone to the destination.

The treatise master first unfolds the whole unit in four movements: viewing the characteristics of the gateways, cultivating the contemplation for entering them, distinguishing coarse and wondrous, and carrying out opening and revelation. The four form an internal sequence. Without knowing gateway characteristics, contemplation has no entrance. If one knows an entrance but does not distinguish coarse and wondrous, the gateway may instead become attachment. Only after success and failure have been clarified can people, Dharmas, gateways, and principles not yet wondrous all be opened and revealed.

〔Section §02〕 The Four Propositions Are Only Gateways; They Do Not Possess the True Mark

The Buddha-Dharma cannot be directly displayed through words, yet the Buddha must respond to conditions and express principle through the four propositions of existence, nonexistence, both existence and nonexistence, and neither existence nor nonexistence. Their value lies in giving access, not in dividing the true mark into four pieces. The true mark cannot even be fixed as one, much less can there truly be four true marks. The four are only four kinds of entrance.

The cooling-pool simile says that those of sharp faculties can enter and those of dull faculties can enter; not only the concentrated, but also those with scattered minds, those intent on a single purpose, and those diligent in effort can enter through a gateway. The great-fire simile deepens the distinction between gain and loss: when fire is not grasped, it can warm the body and cook food; reaching out to grasp it instead results in being burned. The four gateways originally give access to prajñā, remove afflictions, and accomplish the great matter. Once grasped, they turn into the fire of wrong views. Skillful use of a gateway does not mean abandoning it, but refusing to seize its characteristics as a real entity while using it.

Teaching and practice likewise open and combine according to faculties. Some hear teaching and, like a swift horse seeing a whip’s shadow, immediately enter the road. Some cultivate contemplation and, like seeing lightning in the night, immediately see the path. Others must contemplate after hearing or hear again after contemplating. Practitioners through faith and practitioners through Dharma can therefore turn into one another: teaching can become an entrance into contemplation, and contemplation can in turn illuminate what has been heard. The four kinds of teaching each have four gateways, first making sixteen. When teaching and contemplation are discussed together, the round number is thirty-two. Looking more closely at the causes of embodiment, spiritual advisers, and immeasurable contemplative practices, the gateways are actually beyond count. The city Joyful to Behold has twelve hundred gateways; the Dharma-city of the true mark would hardly admit only one track.

〔Section §03〕 Four Tripiṭaka Gateways: One Set of Four Truths, Four Entries into Truth

The Tripiṭaka gateway of existence establishes existence through right causes and conditions. Birth-and-death is not produced by a primordial world-nature, atoms, or parents, but ignorance gives rise to formations, afflictions, karma, and suffering. Suffering, accumulation, path, and cessation can all be discussed through existence. Conditioned dharmas are impermanent, suffering, empty, and without self; cultivating the path produces the uncontaminated; severing the two bonds of seeds and recompense brings nirvāṇa with remainder and without remainder. Seeing the path through existence is the gateway of existence.

The gateway of emptiness analyzes the provisional and the real within right causes and conditions into the equality of emptiness, giving rise to the uncontaminated and seeing the Dharma-body through emptiness. Subhūti’s contemplation of impermanent arising and ceasing in the stone chamber shows that emptiness can serve as a gateway. As for the treatise said to uphold this gateway, the root text itself retains the word “perhaps” and does not make a definitive attribution.

The gateway both existent and empty sees causes and conditions as both existent and empty, using this to break one-sided attachment to either existence or nonexistence. The gateway neither existent nor nonexistent leaves both extremes. The stories of Kātyāyana and Channa entering the path display the functions of the latter two gateways. At the end of the fourth gateway, a form of Abhidharma is also recorded that places the person in a fifth, inexpressible category: the person is not existent in the three times and is not nonexistent as an unconditioned dharma. The treatise master again leaves this undetermined. Each gateway has a transmitted exposition; all four access partial truth.

〔Section §04〕 Four Shared Gateways: Six Parts of a Mirror Image, Empty Just as They Are

The Tripiṭaka Teaching analyzes form to enter emptiness, like dividing a supposedly real person’s head into six parts and learning that no person can be found in any part. The Shared Teaching instead resembles looking at a mirror image: the head and its six parts are empty just as they appear and need not first be analyzed away. The short statement identifying cloth and emptiness marks how embodying a dharma differs from analyzing it.

Here the emptiness of sentient beings and emptiness of dharmas are no longer divided into earlier and later. Emptiness of beings is emptiness of dharmas, and emptiness of dharmas is emptiness of beings, just as the nature of form and the nature of self are alike in being illusory. “Constantly empty in nature” further means that dharmas do not become empty only after examination; there is never a moment when their nature is not empty. A moon in water and an image in a mirror appear while remaining unattainable and can therefore bear this meaning.

The four gateways are established within illusion. Illusory karma and fruit, through nirvāṇa, appear clearly and form the gateway of existence. Illusion originally has no reality and cannot be found, forming the gateway of emptiness. A mirror image can be seen and yet cannot be attained as something seen, forming the gateway both empty and existent. Neither illusory existence nor illusory emptiness can be held, and relinquishing both forms the gateway neither empty nor existent. The faculties of the three vehicles differ, and each enters ultimate meaning through a corresponding proposition. Their common entry into immediate emptiness does not erase the practices and fruits of the three vehicles.

〔Section §05〕 The Sequential Distinctions of the Distinct Gateways and the First Marking of the Perfect

The Distinct Teaching differs downward from the Tripiṭaka and Shared Teachings and upward from the Perfect Teaching; it enters the Middle through sequential distinctions. The treatise master gathers dispersed scriptural similes of milk, gold, a forehead-jewel, and empty space into four gateways. Curds present in milk, gold in stone, and a jewel in the forehead reveal the gateway of existence. Stone lacking a nature of gold, milk lacking a nature of curds, and buddha-nature resembling empty space reveal the gateway of emptiness. Milk both having and lacking the nature of curds reveals the gateway both existent and nonexistent. Buddha-nature as the Middle Way, with milk neither having nor lacking the nature of curds, reveals the gateway of double negation.

These similes allow a bodhisattva of the Distinct Teaching to see buddha-nature through a gateway and abide in great nirvāṇa. The same wording can elsewhere bear a Perfect meaning, so the gateway name alone does not determine its affiliation. The four Perfect gateways are only first marked here. Though they initially resemble the Distinct gateways in name and meaning, their interpenetration and noninterpenetration and the other distinctions become fully visible only through the later tenfold analysis.

〔Section §06〕 What Is Accessed Is One; What Gives Access May Be Skillful or Clumsy, Oblique or Direct

The point of entering concerns what is accessed; contemplation for entering concerns what enables entry. The sixteen gateways of teaching first collapse into two principles, partial truth and perfect truth. The eight Tripiṭaka and Shared gateways all enter partial truth. The Tripiṭaka analyzes dharmas and follows a winding, narrow path, like four oblique gateways into a provincial city. The Shared embodies dharmas and follows a broad, direct, skillful route, like four direct gateways. Oblique and direct produce eight gateways, yet there is only one governor and the partial truth accessed is nondual.

The eight Distinct and Perfect gateways all enter perfect truth. The Distinct gateways are partial and not yet interpenetrating, like oblique gateways into an imperial capital. The Perfect gateways are perfect and interpenetrating, like direct gateways. There are eight routes, yet the emperor is not two, and the perfect truth accessed is only one. Provincial and imperial cities, governor and emperor, each remain within their own simile and show the difference in what gives access together with the unity of what is accessed.

The Lesser Vehicle establishes only one set of four gateways while the Great Vehicle has three sets, because small and great households differ in depth and breadth. The route through a great household is long; even a thousand gateways and ten thousand doors would not be excessive. A Great Vehicle public gateway is also like the public gateway of a kingdom, which primarily admits officials to court while additionally admitting people to the market. Commoners passing through do not turn it into their exclusive gateway. A Great Vehicle gateway primarily accesses the true mark and secondarily accesses partial truth; people of the three vehicles partly use it to reduce the body to ashes and extinguish cognition, but this does not lower it into a Lesser Vehicle gateway.

〔Section §07〕 Ten Contemplations of the Tripiṭaka Gateway of Existence: From Right Causes and Conditions to Freedom from Dharma Attachment

For a practitioner through faith who awakens as soon as teaching is heard, the mind’s faculties are swift and sharp, and the method of attaining the path is difficult to display. The treatise master therefore takes the practitioner through Dharma and gathers the framework dispersed through the Abhidharma into ten items: recognizing the object, arousing resolve, settling the mind, pervasive breaking, passage and obstruction, factors of the path, counteractives, stages, endurance, and freedom from Dharma attachment. The ten form a road running from beginning to end so practitioners no longer become lost at forks.

The first requirement is to maintain the object of right causes and conditions. Attributing suffering and happiness to Viṣṇu, a primordial world-nature, or atoms posits wrong causes. Saying everything is naturally so posits no cause. Disputes over the existence and nonexistence of the smallest particle can still fall into two views. Right contemplation instead sees coarse and subtle, cause and condition, suffering and accumulation, and dependent and primary recompense as impermanent and without master, all produced through ignorance and inversion. The second requirement is then to turn away from the fire-wheel revolved by ignorance, purely arouse the two vehicles’ resolve for release, remain unmixed with reputation and gain, and cease increasing suffering and accumulation.

Third, concentration in the five meditations for settling the mind and wisdom in the four establishments of mindfulness are harmonized to settle the mind. Counting breaths from one through ten means also knowing each thought of breath and count to arise and cease. When contemplation of impurity gives rise to anger, kindness restores balance. Contemplation of causes and conditions sees the four kinds of birth horizontally and the three realms vertically as all dependently arisen. When obstructions arise, one recollects the Buddha. Concentration and wisdom are like the paired wisdom and virtue of a worthy person. Concentration alone resembles much virtue with little wisdom, and wisdom alone much wisdom with little virtue; neither can be called worthy. A non-Buddhist who does not know how to churn and agitate milk cannot even obtain milk serum, much less make curds and ghee.

Fourth, impermanence is used to break all views pervasively. Permanent, impermanent, both, and neither are Dharma-objects producing views through contact with the mind faculty. Because they arise from conditions, impermanence can break them. Fifth, passage and obstruction are distinguished within the views: the eighty-eight compulsions are obstruction and path and cessation are passage. Grasping one’s own view as real, craving moistening it into karma and fruit, is obstruction. Knowing a view as impermanent without attachment, and therefore producing neither karma nor fruit while opening path and cessation, is passage. A worm gnawing wood may accidentally form a written shape without knowing whether it is a graph; this reflects the loss of failing to discern passage and obstruction.

Sixth, the establishments of mindfulness of body, feeling, mind, and dharmas unfold as the four right efforts, four bases of supernormal power, five faculties, five powers, seven factors of awakening, and noble eightfold path, making the thirty-seven factors. Two aspects under suffering lead to emptiness; four under accumulation, four under path, and the other two under suffering lead to non-activity; and four under cessation lead to signlessness. These three gateways of liberation lead into the city of nirvāṇa. Seventh, when right wisdom is weak, the twelve meditations and related practices provide support: desire is met with impurity and the liberations, lack of mastery with the spheres of mastery, lack of breadth with the totalities, slight merit with the immeasurable minds, and the wish to transcend form with the four formless attainments.

Eighth, one distinguishes worthy and noble, true and resembling stages, so overweening pride cannot counterfeit nobility. Ninth, one turns from separate to general establishments of mindfulness and endures inner and outer obstructions, allowing warmth, summit, and receptivity to continue. Warmth resembles smoke near the path; if endurance fails at the summit, one falls back to this side. Tenth, after the four wholesome roots have arisen, one does not become attached to what accords with the path. Although Dharma attachment does not immediately cause regression into grave wrongdoing, it blocks seeing the truths. Only by extinguishing attachment and arousing the true illumination of receptivity to suffering can one become a stream-enterer, directly attain a higher fruit, or reach the stage beyond learning.

The treatise compiled by five hundred arhats precisely upholds attainment of the path through the gateway of existence. The four gateways are therefore not merely devices for regulating the mind. When properly harmonized they all enable the path; when grasped they all obstruct it. The skillful means of prajñā prevent falling into existence or nonexistence. The ten contemplations are the complete skillful means that pass directly from the gateway of existence into partial truth. The other three gateways each have ten contemplations broadly the same with minor differences and likewise sever delusions of the three realms.

〔Section §08〕 Ten Contemplations of the Shared Teaching: Cultivating within Illusion, Entering through Nonattainment

The Shared gateway of existence likewise contains ten contemplations, all unfolded within illusion. The object consists of dharmas like illusions. The resolve of the three vehicles is broadly the same with minor differences. Śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas likewise attain the path of liberation and nirvāṇa through prajñā, showing that the Great Vehicle gateway primarily accesses the true mark while secondarily admitting the three vehicles, without any need to invent another fixed identity to explain them.

Although concentration and wisdom cannot be attained, the mind is still settled through concentration and wisdom. The four views, the sixty-two views, and all dharmas are illusory and are pervasively broken through wisdom like an illusion. Suffering and accumulation within illusion are obstruction; path and cessation within illusion are passage. With a mind of nonattainment, one cultivates the thirty-seven factors; with nothing to be treated, one trains in the counteractives; stages from dry wisdom to buddhahood remain clear. Wisdom like an illusion is not shaken by outer Māras or driven back by inner obstructions. Dharmas do not arise and prajñā arises, yet prajñā is not grasped; one thereby enters truth and attains receptivity to the nonarising of dharmas. The skillfulness relative to analysis lies precisely in embodiment as illusion.

The other three gateways also each possess ten contemplations. The gateway of existence is expanded as the example; the abbreviations still leave the same ten items running through cultivation from beginning to end.

〔Section §09〕 Ten Contemplations of the Distinct Teaching: Breaking the Weeds to Reveal the Treasury of Gold

The Distinct gateway of existence establishes the wondrous existence of the tathāgata-garbha as its object. It transcends the gateways of ordinary beings, the two vehicles, and the Shared Teaching, supports all dharmas, and gives rise to all dharmas. Sentient beings possess this wondrous existence yet resemble a treasury of gold covered by weeds, a forehead-jewel lost amid fighting, or a poor orphan exposed outside. Seeing this, bodhisattvas give rise to great kindness and compassion and arouse the four universal vows, not for one person, country, or a dust-mote number in a realm alone, but for all sentient beings of the Dharma realm, with the force of a lion’s roar.

Settling the mind still depends on the mutual support of concentration and wisdom: cultivate concentration when concentration is appropriate and wisdom when wisdom is appropriate, caring for the mind through concentration and spurring it through wisdom. The wisdom of wondrous existence pervasively breaks views within birth-and-death and also breaks immersion in emptiness as realization. A great tree does not host a hostile bird, showing that the grasping of nirvāṇa likewise is not allowed to remain. The Snow Mountains contain both poisonous plants and a king of medicines, showing that passage and obstruction must be recognized at each level: the suffering and accumulation of the six paths relative to the path and cessation of the two vehicles; the suffering and accumulation of the two vehicles relative to the bodhisattva’s path and cessation; and bodhisattva suffering and accumulation relative to the Buddha’s path and cessation. Even while knowing the Buddha-path, one understands that attachment to it can become obstruction again.

The thirty-seven factors are a bodhisattva’s jeweled torch. Leaving the ten characteristics enters the samādhi of emptiness; not seeing even a characteristic of emptiness enters the samādhi of signlessness; making no constructed aspiration enters the samādhi of non-activity. Permanence and impermanence, constancy and inconstancy, peace and absence of peace, conditioned and unconditioned, severance and nonseverance, nirvāṇa and non-nirvāṇa, supreme and nonsupreme become gateways of counteraction helping to open the true mark.

The depth of the ten faiths, ten abodes, ten practices, ten dedications, ten grounds, equal awakening, and wondrous awakening is not confused. Inwardly, one endures wholesome and unwholesome impulses and the two thieves of accordance and opposition; outwardly, the eight winds. When a resembling Dharma appears without Dharma attachment, one does not fall at the summit of the bodhisattva stages. Only without this attachment can one break the weeds of ignorance, reveal the treasury of wondrous existence, see buddha-nature, and enter the true mark. The gateways of emptiness, both, and neither each accomplish the same ten contemplations through their own skillful means.

〔Section §10〕 Ten Distinctions of the Perfect Gateway: The Full Span from Interpenetration to Simile

A Perfect gateway takes the form of birth-and-death as immediately the form of Dharma-nature and accesses the Middle in that very form, revealing the Dharma free of contention. A Distinct gateway instead sequentially extinguishes the form of birth-and-death and the form of Dharma-nature before accessing the Middle. Both access the Middle, and the treatise master unfolds their difference through ten aspects: interpenetration, immediacy to dharmas, buddha-wisdom, sequence, severance, stages, fruit, expression, questions and answers, and similes.

First is interpenetration. The Distinct gateways of existence, emptiness, both, and neither each remain within their own portion. A Perfect gateway teaches existence without blocking nonexistence and nonexistence without blocking existence. Existence and nonexistence are nondual; one gateway is the other three, one gateway is immeasurable gateways, and immeasurable gateways are one. Though true, good, and wondrous existence and the real existence of non-Buddhists may share a name, they differ in substance like the raw jades of Zhou and Zheng, with value separated as far as heaven from earth. Mixing gold and stone causes people to lose the division between wrong and right; precise knowledge of the four gateways restores it.

Interpenetration also appears in breaking and integration. Breaking only non-Buddhists while preserving the two vehicles and Great Vehicle skillful means, or integrating unwholesome Dharmas while not integrating people of the two vehicles, remains sequentially distinct. Perfect breaking breaks both people and Dharmas from the Distinct Teaching downward, leaving not even those of the thatched hut fixed. Perfect integration extends from Never Disparaging’s assembly, Devadatta, the dragon girl, and animals to worldly occupations, practices of the two vehicles, and the father-and-child simile; no kind of person or Dharma remains outside the wondrous. The sequence of a scriptural passage and its stages can alter the affiliation of language about interpenetration, so such language must be read together with the position of realization.

Second is immediacy to dharmas. A Distinct gateway separately teaches true, good, and wondrous existence outside birth-and-death and ultimate emptiness outside the two vehicles’ truth. A Perfect gateway instead teaches the existence of birth-and-death as immediately the existence of the true mark: all dharmas converge upon existence, existence is the Dharma realm, and birth-and-death is nirvāṇa. One gateway is only the opening of discourse and in reality perfectly contains all dharmas.

Third is wisdom. Distinguishing all-wisdom and knowledge of path varieties as illuminating Dharmas as numerous as the sands of the Ganges is bodhisattva-wisdom. The knowledge of all modes together with the five eyes perfectly illuminating the Dharma realm is buddha-wisdom. Fourth is practice. Proceeding through stages from subtle to manifest, unable to contain immeasurable practices in one practice, is sequential. All practices converging upon one practice, and one practice immediately containing immeasurable practices, is pervasive practice.

Fifth is severance. The Distinct gateways gradually cut apart the five abodes of delusion and reveal conceivable wisdom and severance. Perfect gateways teach that the nature of ignorance originally does not exist and that understanding and delusion are nondual; they speak of severing within nonseverance and reveal inconceivable severance. The two sets of scriptural statements concerning wisdom and affliction, light and darkness, give both severance and nothing to be severed their place.

Sixth is stage. Assigning views and thoughts within the realms to the thirty minds, and views, thoughts, and ignorance beyond the realms to the ten grounds, with ignorance exhausted after equal awakening, gives skillful stages. Cultivating the three contemplations in one mind from the initial resolve, perfectly subduing at the ten faiths and perfectly severing throughout the forty minds up to equal and wondrous awakening, gives real stages. Seventh is fruit. Saying the Dharma-body is originally present, prajñā cultivated, and liberation completed at the end, while each causal ground is limited, arranges the three virtues vertically. Having all three virtues complete and neither vertical nor horizontal, one Dharma-gateway containing all gateways, the first ground containing the virtues of all grounds, and the graph containing the virtues of all other graphs gives Perfect fruit.

Eighth is what expresses. How the text leads in before the gateway, expresses wisdom, practice, severance, stages, fruit, and similes within the gateway, and concludes afterward must all be threaded by interpenetration and immediacy for its expression to be perfect. One gateway being the other three must be borne by the full beginning and ending of the passage. Ninth, questions and answers are repeatedly examined to verify its intent. Tenth, how gold, silver, jewels, wish-fulfilling jewels, the sun, and the moon are correlated with Dharma is examined. Only when the ten work together do Perfect and Distinct become luminously clear.

〔Section §11〕 Ten Meanings in the Present Sutra: Gateway Characteristics Revealed throughout the Whole Sutra

The treatise master first counts gateways according to the five flavors, then gathers ten meanings dispersed throughout the present sutra. Contemplating all dharmas as empty, definitive resolution of the śrāvaka Dharma, and opening the gateway of skillful means reveal the interpenetration of people and Dharmas. Worldly productive activity not opposing the true mark and the hired laborer being the elder’s son reveal immediacy to dharmas. Opening, revealing, awakening to, and entering the Buddha’s knowing-and-seeing reveals buddha-wisdom. Robe, seat, and room, together with purifying the faculties without severing the five desires, reveal nonsequential practice. Passing five hundred yojanas reveals severing without severance.

The five grades, purification of the six faculties, and the jeweled vehicle traveling in the four directions reveal real stages. The Buddha abiding in the Great Vehicle, adorned with concentration and wisdom, and liberating sentient beings reveals nonvertical fruit. The present Buddha’s passage before the text—palms joined to hear the complete path—and the ancient Buddha’s passage after the text—the meaning of the true mark already taught—reveal perfect expression before and after. Wisdom Accumulation and the dragon girl reveal questions and answers. The crown-jewel of the wheel-turning king and the high, broad cart reveal Perfect similes. These pieces of evidence do not occur in one passage; figures, stages, events, and similes from across the sutra jointly reveal the Perfect gateway.

The sutra’s meaning also establishes four perfectly interpenetrating gateways. The Buddha’s subtle and wondrous wisdom and the Tathāgata’s wisdom contemplating the distant past as today form the gateway of existence. The emptiness of all dharmas and their constantly quiescent characteristic form the gateway of emptiness. Dharmas without self-nature and the buddha-seed arising from conditions form the gateway both empty and existent. Neither such nor different, neither false nor real forms the double-negating gateway. All four are established within one Perfect intent while providing entries for different faculties.

〔Section §12〕 Ten Contemplations of the Perfect Gateway: The Four Truths of One Reality in the Present Practicing Mind

The first Perfect contemplation takes the Four Truths of the one reality as its inconceivable object. The suffering of birth-and-death is empty, provisional, and middle; the three purities are one mind and become great nirvāṇa. The accumulation of afflictions is likewise empty, provisional, and middle; the three wisdoms are one mind and become great prajñā. Suffering is unconstructed cessation, and accumulation unconstructed path. The Four Truths interpenetrate while remaining distinguishable. Birth-and-death is true because empty, good because provisional, and wondrous because middle; the object of the gateway of existence is therefore called true, good, and wondrous form.

The second contemplation arouses resolve from this object. Sentient beings originally are great nirvāṇa yet invert happiness into suffering, and so bodhisattvas give rise to compassion and vow to liberate the unliberated and sever the unsevered. Afflictions originally are bodhi yet beings invert the path into what is not the path, and so bodhisattvas give rise to kindness and vow to enable the unknowing to know and the unattaining to attain. Kindness and compassion are objectless, vows are pure, and beings are naturally drawn in.

The third contemplation settles the mind through two pairs of journey similes. Watching fish beside a pool without making a net means seeing the object without beginning practice. Packing provisions and binding one’s legs while sitting still means arousing vows without advancing. Concentration and wisdom also resemble harmonized yin and yang, balanced wheels, and complete wings. Embodying birth-and-death as nirvāṇa is concentration; penetrating affliction as bodhi is wisdom. Skillful cultivation in one mind completes all practices.

The fourth contemplation pervasively breaks like a vajra axe and an unobscured sun. Segmented and transformational suffering is broken within birth-and-death as nirvāṇa; the accumulation of the four and five abodes is broken within affliction as bodhi. There is ability to break without a fixed object broken. The fifth distinguishes passage and obstruction like a commander’s treasure choosing appropriately, restraining the strong and calming the weak. The faults of birth-and-death and disturbance of affliction are obstruction; their immediacy as nirvāṇa and bodhi is passage. From four non-Buddhist views through Perfect gateways, attachment at every step obstructs and the disappearance of attachment reveals the wondrous. Failure to examine them loses both practice and the precious treasure of understanding.

The sixth contemplation unfolds the four establishments of mindfulness of Dharma-nature from the five aggregates of the ten realms as neither pure nor impure, neither permanent nor impermanent, breaking eight inversions. The establishments contain the factors of the path, the three liberations, and all dharmas. Nirvāṇa as birth-and-death reveals the four withered trees; birth-and-death as nirvāṇa reveals the four flourishing trees; their nonduality reveals neither withered nor flourishing and abiding in great nirvāṇa. The seventh uses immediacy as nirvāṇa to treat the obstruction of recompense and immediacy as bodhi to treat karmic and afflictive obstructions.

The eighth unfolds stages from principle, name, contemplative practice, resemblance, and partial realization through ultimate realization. Birth-and-death as nirvāṇa and affliction as bodhi each proceed through the six. The ninth endures hard and soft inner and outer obstructions. Aggregates, entrances, objects, illness, karma, Māras, dhyāna, the two vehicles, and bodhisattvas do not break the contemplation of immediacy as nirvāṇa; views and overweening pride do not break the contemplation of immediacy as bodhi.

In the tenth, virtues arise after obstructions have been passed: dhyāna and samādhi, dhāraṇī and fearlessness, prajñā and Dharma-body all appear according to contemplation. Resembling virtues most easily produce attachment to what accords with the path, preventing both advance and retreat and leaving one fallen at the summit. Only by swiftly extinguishing this attachment can one break ignorance, open the Buddha’s knowing-and-seeing, and realize the substance of the true mark. Liberation, prajñā, and Dharma-body are thereby complete. One body becomes immeasurable, like a treasury and perfect jewel. The other three gateways also enter the real through ten contemplations.

〔Section §13〕 Dispersed Evidence, Milk, and People Who Refuse the Jewel

Evidence for the ten contemplations in the present sutra is dispersed throughout the work. The Dharma that cannot be shown, the extinction of verbal characteristics, and the wondrous Dharma difficult to conceive reveal the inconceivable object. Supernormal power and wisdom drawing beings to abide in the Dharma reveal true resolve. The Buddha abiding in the Great Vehicle, adorned with concentration and wisdom, reveals settling the mind and accomplishing self and others. The Dharma-king breaking existence and the sun and moon dispelling darkness reveal pervasive breaking. The guide saving people on the dangerous road reveals passage and obstruction. Pure Store and Pure Eye cultivating the factors of the path and the perfections reveal both factors and counteractives. Increasing the path, diminishing birth, and traveling in four directions reveal stages. Mount Sumeru unmoved and the Tathāgata’s robe reveal endurance. Hearing sounds without attachment, purification of the six faculties, and the truly pure great Dharma reveal freedom from Dharma attachment.

The intent of the ten contemplations also appears dispersed throughout Lesser and Great Vehicle scriptures and treatises, like Mount Malaya producing only sandalwood; it differs from the four non-Buddhist Vedas and the works of Zhuangzi and Laozi. If people can lecture and read but do not recognize skillful means for practice when facing the words, they resemble those who know how to milk but not how to churn and agitate milk into curds and ghee. Knowing the ten contemplations within the four gateways lets the Lesser Vehicle enter truth and the Great Vehicle enter the real, like eating milk gruel and becoming replete.

Half or all of a wish-fulfilling jewel can be given to everyone. Yet if recipients refuse to value the path over bodily life and diligently cultivate, refusing both to receive and to use it, the gift has no immediate benefit. The treatise master’s lament does not end in disappointment: even when no benefit is presently visible, the Dharma-sound can still plant the cause of the poisoned drum and leave a seed for breaking delusion later.

〔Section §14〕 The Gateway That Gives Access and the Principle Accessed

To judge coarse and wondrous, one must first distinguish access from what is accessed: the gateway is what gives access and principle is what is accessed. This yields four propositions: access and what is accessed both coarse; access wondrous while what is accessed coarse; access coarse while what is accessed wondrous; and both wondrous. Tripiṭaka gateways support concrete matters and are shallow, expressing only partial truth, so both are coarse. Shared gateways embody dharmas skillfully but the three vehicles realize partial truth, so access is wondrous and what is accessed coarse. Distinct gateways use skillful means of the teaching-path to express perfect truth, so access is coarse and what is accessed wondrous. Perfect gateways teach truly from the realization-path and are perfect immediately in present matters, so both are wondrous.

Placed within the four flavors, the raw-ghee teaching carries coarse in both access and what is accessed. The milk teaching carries coarse in neither. The refined-ghee teaching carries coarse in what is accessed but not in access. The Perfect receiving the Shared and Distinct, together with the gateways of the Nirvāṇa Sūtra, carry coarse in access but not in what is accessed. This first separates the route from its destination so the name of a gateway does not silently replace the principle realized.

〔Section §15〕 The One Narrow Gateway: Teaching, Practice, and Principle in the Four Teachings

The sutra speaks of one gateway that is narrow, and the treatise master opens the statement through questions and answers. Tripiṭaka gateways are four because they respond to faculties, employ different skillful means, and give access differently. They are one because all are the Buddha’s teaching, all face nirvāṇa, and all converge upon what is accessed. The absence of bodhi from their words is narrowness in teaching. A constricted road unable to admit two people side by side is narrowness in practice. Difficulty attaining true truth through teaching and practice is narrowness in principle.

The Shared Teaching is likewise four and one according to faculties, contemplations, and access. Present matters are immediately true, and bodhi is already present in the words. Wholesome and unwholesome are both contemplated as unattainable and can travel side by side, so teaching and practice are not narrow in this sense. Difficulty in reaching the principle of nonarising is narrowness in principle.

The Distinct Teaching is four because taught for four faculties and one because all is the Buddha’s teaching. Contemplations for entering the real differ while all face the one reality. Birth-and-death is not yet immediately nirvāṇa, so teaching is narrow. Afflictions are not yet immediately bodhi, so practice is narrow. Difficulty attaining principle through teaching and practice makes principle narrow.

The Perfect Teaching is likewise four according to four faculties and four contemplations, and one according to the Buddha’s teaching and the true principle. Birth-and-death is nirvāṇa, so teaching is not narrow. Affliction is bodhi, so practice is not narrow. Yet teaching and contemplation may still fail to accord with principle, so principle can still be called narrow. “One gateway” and “narrow” are therefore not fixed labels attached to one teaching. They must be read through teaching, practice, and principle and through how the gateway responds to faculties, faces reality, and grasps principle.

〔Section §16〕 A Gateway Is Wondrous When It Fits the Faculty and Coarse When Grasped

All four Tripiṭaka gateways give access. Attachment to any obstructs; proper adjustment in any enables the path. Looking only at Dharma characteristics, the gateway of existence adheres to conventional truth and is clumsy, the gateway of emptiness lies close to truth and is skillful, the gateway both existent and nonexistent is skillful relative to the earlier gateways but clumsy relative to the double negation. Looking at faculties, however, the gateway suited to existence succeeds and the other three fail, and the same applies to whichever gateway is suitable.

The four siddhāntas make success and failure more precise: according with desire or opposing disposition, meeting what is suitable or failing to do so, treating illness or failing to treat it, seeing ultimate meaning or failing to see it. The ten contemplations likewise examine each item: right object, true resolve, harmonious settlement, pervasive breaking, discernment of passage and obstruction, through freedom from Dharma attachment. The gateway whose ten items succeed is wondrous; one whose ten items miss their place is coarse.

The one principle accessed by the Shared Teaching cannot be compared through form, and coarse and wondrous lie in response to faculties and cultivation. A gateway that meets the four kinds of faculties through the siddhāntas and whose ten contemplations each find their place is wondrous. One that opposes faculties and loses contemplation is burned by the fire on the four sides and cannot enter the cooling pool.

If the Distinct gateways are ranked only by Dharma characteristics, existence adheres to matters and emptiness lies close to principle; single emptiness is surpassed by both, and preserving both is surpassed by relinquishing both. According to faculties and conditions, however, any gateway can be wondrous by corresponding to desire, being suitable, treating an evil, and revealing principle; it can be coarse through the opposites. The two fruits Zhentoujia and Jialuojia illuminate the success and failure of the ten contemplations item by item. Recognizing true, good, and wondrous form, genuinely arousing resolve, settling concentration and wisdom, breaking pervasively, discerning passage and obstruction, cultivating the factors of the path, understanding counteractives, knowing stages, enduring, and lacking Dharma attachment are the sweet fruit. Their ten opposites are the poisonous fruit.

The root treatise uses nine parts poisonous and one part sweet to show many failures and little attainment. If all ten contemplations succeed, there are ten parts sweet fruit and all ten are wondrous. Nine parts poisonous are still coarse; one part sweet is still wondrous, as a thousand pounds of layered blossoms do not equal one ounce of real gold. Every gateway is judged by success or failure in its own ten contemplations; number and image both serve the distinction between right and wrong practice.

All four Perfect gateways are equal in Dharma characteristics and all wondrous. The gateways of existence, emptiness, both, and neither are each the Dharma realm and each encompasses all dharmas. Their differences arise only from faculties, like four fingers pointing at one moon: the moon is one, while the fingers are four. Past investigation of principle and cultivation of goodness within the four gateways formed dispositions of wisdom and merit. In this life, people give rise to craving and grasping according to prior cultivation, and desires, suitability, and counteraction differ. The Buddha clearly illuminates their faculties, responds to four desires through the worldly siddhānta, produces four kinds of goodness through the individually adapted siddhānta, treats four attachments through the counteractive siddhānta, and lets four people see principle through the siddhānta of ultimate meaning. With these four conditions, all four gateways become the direct unsurpassed path.

Success and failure in teaching follow the same principle. Without understanding the four siddhāntas, different traditions resemble the southern and northern paths and later theories, each calling itself true and rejecting the others; all four gateways fail. A Perfect gateway is open and interpenetrating and should be able to dissolve disputes among scriptures and treatises. In awakening, four attachments are not retained; in cultivation, every gateway can give access. Attachment in a Distinct gateway is heavy, like a dull horse requiring a painful blow; attachment in a Perfect gateway is light, like a swift horse moving on seeing the whip’s shadow. Before ultimate meaning is gained, the benefits of the first three siddhāntas may still remain.

Each of the four siddhāntas can be real in a corresponding condition and false where it does not correspond. The worldly, individually adapted, and counteractive siddhāntas are real in worldly establishment and false from ultimate meaning. The siddhānta of ultimate meaning is real in the principle it reveals and false as a worldly establishment. The real side is wondrous and the false side coarse. Coarse and wondrous therefore remain living judgments of correspondence to faculties, attainment of benefit, and successful contemplation, not a static sequence of gateway names.

〔Section §17〕 Retaining and Retiring Gateways through the Five Flavors Each Has Its Conditions

Placed within the five flavors, the counts are exact. The milk teaching has eight gateways, four coarse and four wondrous, with all that is accessed wondrous. The curds teaching has four gateways, with gateway and principle both coarse. The raw-ghee teaching has sixteen, twelve coarse and four wondrous, with two coarse and two wondrous principles accessed. The refined-ghee teaching has twelve, eight coarse and four wondrous, with one coarse and one wondrous principle. The Lotus Sutra has four gateways, all wondrous, and one principle that is likewise wondrous.

Before the Lotus, the gateways and principles of śrāvakas were coarse; at the Lotus, gateway and principle interpenetrate as wondrous. Bodhisattvas vary: some already interpenetrated as wondrous during the vaipulya or prajñā teachings, while those of dullest faculties still awaited the Lotus. The Nirvāṇa Sūtra has sixteen gateways, twelve coarse and four wondrous, while all that is accessed is wondrous. Because every Dharma has the nature of peace and happiness and every sentient being has buddha-nature, only one wondrous principle is accessed, yet coarse gateways remain as skillful means for drawing people in.

The Lotus Sutra subdues, breaking attachment to provisional gateways and principles like the Golden-Sand River traveling straight with no bend. The Nirvāṇa Sūtra embraces, permitting provisional gateways again like a hundred differently flowing rivers entering the same sea. Golden sands emphasize a straight course without turning; the hundred rivers emphasize different currents sharing one destination. The establishments of retaining and retiring differ, but the sea of the real is not two.

〔Section §18〕 What Is Opened Is the Person, Dharma, Teaching, Practice, and Principle Not Yet Wondrous

The final section first asks why the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā teaches Great Vehicle gateways before those of the two vehicles while this unit begins with lesser gateways and only then greater ones. The answer lies in timing. The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā addressed an already formed disease of views, first sweeping it away through Great Vehicle emptiness and then showing a gateway into truth. The present sutra addresses people remaining in the thatched hut; it must first list lesser gateways, then open skillful means and reveal perfect reality. The different orders each address the illness of their occasion.

Teachings after the Lotus need no further opening. Among teachings before the Lotus, a gateway or principle already wondrous has nothing more to be opened. If gateway and principle are wondrous but the person is not, opening applies to that person. Wherever gateway, principle, or person remains unwondrous, each is opened.

Craving, views, and affliction are opened as bodhi; birth-and-death as nirvāṇa; ordinary beings as wondrous persons; discourse born of craving and views as the Buddha-Dharma; all sentient beings as wondrous principle. Lesser Vehicle Dharma is opened as wondrous Dharma, śrāvaka teaching as Great Vehicle transformation, śrāvaka practice as the bodhisattva-path, and śrāvaka principle as the true mark. The still-unresolved bodhisattvas of the Tripiṭaka, Shared, and Distinct Teachings are likewise opened and attain the Perfect.

Opening and revelation therefore do not merely change a name, but give people together with Dharma, teaching, practice, and principle their full place. Everything not yet wondrous enters the wondrous, and neither gateway nor principle remains inaccessible. This is opening the provisional to reveal the real and deciding the coarse so that it becomes wondrous.

Through the Eye of the Shiqian

In the Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian (T1717), Zhanran first divides this unit into the reason for its introduction and the proper unfolding and explanation of the section, then expressly judges all sixteen gateways to be gateways into the real〔0937a21–a26〕. This first view stabilizes the unit’s direction: though the four propositions, four teachings, and sixteen gateways differ as skillful and clumsy, partial and perfect, interpenetrating and separated, all function as gateways by giving access. Their gain or loss depends on whether they correspond to faculties, complete contemplation, and avoid attachment.

The second view distinguishes teaching from practice. Zhanran says that practice is precisely contemplation〔0937b10〕, allowing the gateway of teaching and gateway of practice to support one another without being confused. Awakening upon hearing, entering through contemplation, turning from hearing to contemplation, and turning from contemplation back to hearing are paths for different faculties. Teaching and contemplation together making thirty-two is only a large count and cannot close immeasurable spiritual advisers and practices within a fixed category.

The third view distinguishes the point of entering from contemplation. “The point concerns what is accessed; contemplation concerns what enables entry”〔0938a14〕 gives the provincial-city and imperial-city similes their clear places. Oblique and direct gateways describe routes of access; governor and emperor describe the principle accessed. The first eight gateways all access partial truth and the latter eight all access perfect truth. Routes divide into eight while the destination is nondual.

The fourth view addresses abbreviation. Because the unit emphasizes the characteristics of the teaching, the Tripiṭaka, Shared, Distinct, and Perfect Teachings each commonly expand one gateway and leave the other three to be understood from it. Zhanran explicitly says that contemplative methods are abbreviated here and fully expanded elsewhere in the Mohe Zhiguan (T1911)〔0938a22–a26〕. The abbreviation is a choice of genre, not an absence of contemplative items. Every gateway must still be threaded by object, arousing resolve, settling the mind, pervasive breaking, passage and obstruction, factors of the path, counteractives, stages, endurance, and freedom from attachment.

The fifth view rests on the ten distinctions of the Distinct and Perfect. Zhanran points out that each of the first seven meanings has three sections〔0939b05〕: first properly distinguishing the meaning, next judging Perfect and Distinct, and then determining affiliation from the sequence of scripture and stages of practice. Interpenetration, immediacy, buddha-wisdom, sequence, severance, stages, and fruit cannot be classified by seizing one sentence. The eighth, perfect expression, further joins the lead-in, body, and conclusion of a gateway; the ninth, questions and answers, and the tenth, similes, then provide confirmation.

The sixth view illuminates the Four Truths of the one reality. Zhanran uses the present thought-moment containing the suffering and accumulation of the ten Dharma realms〔0940c03〕 to show that suffering and accumulation are not abstract categories in a distant place. Suffering, accumulation, path, and cessation are immediately one another while still remaining distinguishable in aspect. Precisely because they are immediate, resolve, concentration and wisdom, pervasive breaking, passage and obstruction, factors of the path, counteractives, stages, endurance, and freedom from attachment can all be cultivated in the present mind.

The seventh view notices how scriptural evidence is dispersed. The Mohe Zhiguan concentrates on the great cart to reveal contemplation, while this unit cites passages dispersed throughout the entire Lotus Sutra〔0941a23–a26〕. The Dharma that cannot be shown, the Buddha abiding in the Great Vehicle, the guide saving people from danger, purification of the six faculties, and other passages occur in different chapters. The treatise master gathers them as ten contemplations according to function. They form a common mirror without being rearranged into one continuous scriptural passage.

The eighth view judges coarse and wondrous again. Zhanran summarizes the latter half through “the four gateways are teaching, the ten contemplations are practice”〔0942a21〕. Skillfulness or clumsiness of a gateway-Dharma is only the first level. One must also consider whether the four siddhāntas fit faculties and whether each proposition in the ten contemplations is properly placed. The same gateway may obstruct when grasped and give access when properly used. The Zhentoujia and Jialuojia simile places success and failure item by item within cultivation.

The ninth view distinguishes retaining from retiring. The Lotus Sutra subdues like the Golden-Sand River traveling straight without a bend; the Nirvāṇa Sūtra embraces like a hundred rivers with different currents entering one sea. Zhanran does not show two mutually exclusive destinations, but two ways of drawing people toward the same real principle: one breaks fixed attachment to provisional gateways and principles, while the other preserves gateways by which those of dull faculties can enter. The sea to which they return is nondual.

The final view concerns the recipients of opening and revelation. Zhanran divides proper opening into ordinary beings, the two vehicles, and bodhisattvas〔0943b07〕. The two vehicles are further opened in the Dharma signified, teaching that signifies, practice undertaken, and principle realized. Opening and revelation therefore do not rename one abstract term, but bring people, Dharma, teaching, practice, and principle not yet wondrous into the wondrous, level by level. This also returns the unit to its opening: the flying ladder has value because it actually brings people across the ravine.

This mirror also preserves the layers of authorship. The unit crosses fascicles eight and nine; the fascicle titles and “taught by Great Master Zhiyi of Tiantai” join the portions into one discourse. The body has no separate marker for a private explanation by Guanding. The primary voice of all eighteen sections is therefore Zhiyi teaching, with Guanding’s record preserving the layered questions, citations, and similes. The fascicle boundary is a joint in the transmission, not a sudden change of doctrinal speaker.

The eye of the four teachings is also finer than gateway names. Tripiṭaka gateways first establish four propositions through the arising-and-ceasing Four Truths; Shared gateways reestablish them through illusion as immediately empty. Distinct gateways commonly take milk, gold, a jewel, empty space, and related similes to reveal sequential distinctions. Only later are Perfect gateways proven through the ten distinctions as one gateway not obstructing the others. Though all four sets have similar names, their objects, delusions broken, principles accessed, and stages differ. “All are real gateways” concerns their function of giving access, not a leveling of their meanings.

The ten contemplations of a Tripiṭaka gateway are each classified in the Mirror. The right object excludes wrong cause and no cause. Settling the mind harmonizes the five calming meditations and four establishments of mindfulness. Pervasive breaking uses impermanence to sweep away views. Passage and obstruction distinguish the eighty-eight compulsions from path and cessation. The factors of the path lead through the three liberations. Auxiliary practices correspond to obstructing illnesses. Knowledge of stages prevents overweening pride. Endurance allows warmth and summit to continue. Only freedom from attachment enters seeing the truths. The ten are not scattered virtues but a journey in which each earlier item supports the next.

The commander’s-treasure simile for passage and obstruction in the Perfect gateway becomes especially operational in Zhanran’s hands: strong obstruction must be restrained and made to retreat, weak passage must be soothed and made to advance〔0940c28–0941a05〕. “Choosing appropriately” is thus not merely a tone of pacification, but governs advance and retreat at every step of contemplative mind. From the four non-Buddhist views through Perfect gateways, attachment is obstruction; to penetrate yet still lose the wondrous is likewise to lose the precious treasure.

The Mirror also layers the withered-and-flourishing simile under the factors of the path. Nirvāṇa as birth-and-death reveals withering; birth-and-death as nirvāṇa reveals flourishing; their nonduality reveals neither withered nor flourishing. The three levels together establish the truth of the one reality without breaking the trees into another numerical table. Auxiliary practices, stages, endurance, and freedom from attachment then each remain in place; perfect interpenetration does not swallow the sequence of cultivation.

When judging coarse and wondrous, Zhanran strings together gateway, four siddhāntas, faculties, and ten contemplations in four layers. A gateway-Dharma may be skillful or clumsy, the response to faculties may correspond or oppose, the four siddhāntas may be gained or lost, and the ten contemplations may succeed or fail. A loss at any layer can turn even a wondrous name into obstruction. Conversely, a gateway bearing a coarse name can truly give access when it corresponds to desire, meets what is suitable, treats illness, reveals principle, and completes the ten contemplations.

In the Zhentoujia and Jialuojia passage, the Mirror first uses a grove to represent the monastery and its fruits the monastics, then transfers the fruit simile to correct and mistaken forms of the ten contemplations〔0942b14–c06〕. The root treatise’s nine parts poisonous and one part sweet emphasize that many failures do not equal a little attainment. One part sweet fruit still surpasses nine parts poisonous, just as one ounce of real gold surpasses a thousand pounds of layered blossoms. Number and simile both point toward accomplishment of contemplation, not a separate hierarchy of gateway names.

The eye of the five flavors considers both whether gateways are retained and retired and the principle accessed. The Lotus Sutra subdues, preventing crooked provisional attachment from turning back. The Nirvāṇa Sūtra embraces, reopening practicable gateways for people of dull faculties. Golden sands and the hundred rivers each reveal one side: one straight, one gathering, both returning to the sea of the real. Seen from the whole unit, opening and revelation do not destroy all former skillful means, but prevent skillful means from being grasped as the destination.

The Mohe Zhiguan broadly expands the ten contemplations as a method of practice. The Fahua Wenju (T1718) returns the figures, chapter passages, and similes dispersed through this unit to their respective scriptural contexts〔T34 0077c15/0117a04〕. This unit takes the characteristics of the teaching as its axis and links gateway, contemplation, coarse and wondrous, and opening and revelation into one discourse. Read together, the Three Great Works have distinct tasks: practice is expanded, scripture is located, and the Xuanyi shows how every gateway gives access to the sutra’s substance.

考據Apparatus

本單元由教、行能通實相說起,先列四教十六門,再由所通之理轉入能入之觀,次以十重分辨別、圓門相,末從能所、根機、四悉檀與十觀判諸門麁妙,並開未妙之門、理與人而令入妙。開目作『入體之門』,正文作『入實相門』,兩形須並存。

一、科判定位

開目列「四、入體之門」〔T1716 0779a14〕;本單元正文起於「○第四明入實相門者,夫實相幽微,其理淵奧」〔T1716 0784a07〕,止於「是名開權顯實,決麁令妙也。」〔T1716 0792c16〕,下一行已轉『第五、為一切經體』。全文四大科為略示門相、示入門觀、示麁妙、示開顯;依長章內部轉折,可分十八節:

節次起訖綱要
一、總標門意0784a07–0784a12以飛梯喻教、行為門,總標四意。
二、門相總釋0784a12–0784b16四句詮理,辨門之得失、教行互資及十六、三十二乃至無量門。
三、三藏四門0784b17–0784c14有、空、亦有亦空、非有非無四門及各門所申之論。
四、通教四門0784c14–0785a15體色即空,生、法二空相即,以幻化四句立門。
五、別圓門相0785a15–0785b05以乳、金、珠、虛空等擬別教四門,圓門先標而待後詳辨。
六、入門之處0785b05–0785b28十六能通門以前八通偏真、後八通圓真,辨巧拙、偏直與所通不二。
七、藏門十觀0785b28–0787a20信行、法行與有門十觀,餘三門準例。
八、通門十觀0787a20–0787b05幻化境、三乘發心及十觀撮要,餘三門準例。
九、別門十觀0787b05–0787c19妙有境、四弘、定慧、通塞、道品、對治、次位、安忍、離愛。
十、別圓十簡0787c26–0789b16由融、即法、佛智、次第、斷、位、果、詮、問答、譬喻十重辨別圓。
十一、今經十義與圓四門0789b16–0789c10約五味辨門多少,再以今經文證十義及有、空、雙亦、雙非四門。
十二、圓門十觀0789c10–0790b18由一實四諦依次展開境、發心、安心、破遍、通塞、道品、對治、次位、安忍、無法愛。
十三、今經散證與結歎0790b18–0790c17散取全經證十觀,明大小經論皆具其意,並指廣《摩訶止觀》。
十四、能所麁妙0790c17–0791a01先以能通門、所通理四句判麁妙,再約教味重判。
十五、一門狹小問答0791a01–0791a29四教各由教、行、理辨四門與一門、狹小之義。
十六、四教判麁妙0791a29–0792b01依門法、根性、四悉檀、十觀之成壞判麁妙,並以甘毒二果喻別門十觀。
十七、五味判麁妙0792b01–0792b19列五味門、理麁妙,辨法華折伏與涅槃攝受。
十八、開麁顯妙0792b19–0792c16對辨《中論》施設次序,開凡夫、二乘、菩薩及聲聞法、教、行、理。

卷八下在別門十觀後收卷,卷九上題與智者名號之後,方接圓門入實觀;卷題、卷次與題署是傳本框架,不另算義理一節。全單元未見『私』或『記者釋曰』等換層標記,故依現存題署作智者講說、灌頂筆錄。

二、成立與傳本

本論緣起所誌,智者於江陵寺說,灌頂受聞而記,並明記《玄》《文》各十卷〔T1716 0681a16–a23〕。

三、所引經論覆核

所屬典籍

下表題名依各本藏經題署;代表位置只標本單元實際對讀的場景。

本論略稱或用途藏經題名藏號代表位置定位
《法華》、今經、經、文《妙法蓮華經》T02620013c04 等本單元散引最多。
《大論》、《釋論》《大智度論》T15090061b14 等四句、四門、火譬、對治與二空等。
《大集》《大方等大集經》T03970013c13憍陳如見實義偈。
《大品》《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》T02230234a15 等二乘學般若、常性空與阿字門等。
《華嚴》《大方廣佛華嚴經》T02780698c25、0395b25法界眾生發心與一地攝諸地。
《大經》、《涅槃》《大般涅槃經》T03740518b16 等別門諸譬、煖法、智惑、甘毒果與安樂性。
《淨名》《維摩詰所說經》T04750542b16 等菩提相、涅槃相、婬怒癡性與明脫。
《思益》《思益梵天所問經》T05860041c06三十二大悲。
青目注論、《中論》《中論》T15640025b23、0033b11三種實相、因緣生法偈與末二品。
《成實論》《成實論》T16460251b22三心滅可作空義近證,不含石室故事。
《毘婆沙》《阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論》T15450001a05題署五百大阿羅漢等造。
《須跋陀羅經》場景的現存承載本《長阿含經》T00010025a29經內須跋與八聖道場景,非同題單行本。
十相旁證《阿毘達磨俱舍論》T15580149c21後釋稱其文同,今本為撮稱。
指廣《止觀》《摩訶止觀》T19110001a03–a06本論只作委如之指廣。
校記旁證《宗鏡錄》T20160546c18只屬傳本校記旁證。

門義、四教與前三教十觀

本論形今本對讀關係
「以佛教門出三界苦。」〔T1716 0784a09〕《妙法蓮華經》作「以佛教門出三界苦」〔T0262 0013c04〕字面相合,本論自加句號。
「佛子行道已,來世得作佛。」〔T1716 0784a10〕《妙法蓮華經》作「佛子行道已,來世得作佛」〔T0262 0008b26〕字面相合,今本偈後續文。
「於如是法,說第一義悉檀,所謂一切實,一切不實,一切亦實亦不實,一切非實非不實。」〔T1716 0784a14〕《大智度論》作「一切實一切非實,及一切實亦非實,一切非實非不實,是名諸法之實相。」〔T1509 0061b14〕同為第一義悉檀四句;不實、非實,有無『及』及收句皆異。
「入實相門」〔T1716 0784a18〕本論內部命名。非外典引文。
「四門入清涼池」〔T1716 0784a18〕《大智度論》先作「譬如熱時,清涼池,有目有足皆可入」〔T1509 0640c10〕,續作「四門、般若波羅蜜池亦如是」〔T1509 0640c11〕場景相合,本論撮成一語。
「般若有四種相,所謂有相、無相、乃至非有、非無相。」〔T1716 0784a20〕《大智度論》作「諸法有四種相:一者說有,二者說無,三者說亦有亦無,四者說非有非無。」〔T1509 0517b22〕四相結構同,主語與列法有別。
「般若波羅蜜譬如大火焰,四邊不可取,邪見火燒故。」〔T1716 0784a23〕《大智度論》偈作「般若波羅蜜,譬如大火焰,四邊不可取,無取亦不取。」〔T1509 0190c23〕;論釋另作「譬如火焰,四邊不可觸,以燒手故;般若波羅蜜相,亦如是不可觸,以邪見火燒故。」〔T1509 0139c19〕本論合偈與論釋為一句。
「說種種法門,宣示於佛道。」〔T1716 0784b16〕《妙法蓮華經》作「以種種法門,宣示於佛道」〔T0262 0009b22〕說、以異。
「甚深之理不可說,第一實義無聲字,陳如比丘於諸法,獲得真實之知見。」〔T1716 0784b23〕《大方等大集經》作「甚深之義不可說,第一實義無聲字,憍陳比丘於諸法,獲得真實之知見」〔T0397 0013c13〕理、義與陳如、憍陳異。
「佛告比丘:觀空即疊,觀疊即空。」〔T1716 0784c19〕《大智度論》有「是疊隨心有」〔T1509 0148a04〕今本可定疊隨心有的場景,未得本論完整對話式連句。
十一「一切實一切不實,一切亦實亦不實,一切非實非不實。」〔T1716 0785a01〕《大智度論》同第三項所列四句〔T1509 0061b14〕不實、非實及連接字有別。
十二「諸法實相有三種。」〔T1716 0785a14〕《中論》作「佛說實相有三種」〔T1564 0025b23〕諸法、佛說異。
十三「亦名為假名」〔T1716 0785a16〕《中論》作「亦為是假名」〔T1564 0033b12〕名為、為是異。
十四「色若麁若細,總而觀之,無常無我。」〔T1716 0785c18〕《大智度論》作「色若麁若細,若內若外,總而觀之,無常無我。」〔T1509 0148a03〕本論省若內若外。
十五「但修無常,可以得道,可以得通。」〔T1716 0786b08〕所指待考。本論題為五百比丘語達兜,未得可唯一綁定的現存連句。
十六「貪欲起,教修不淨,背捨等;緣中不自在,當教勝處;緣中不廣普,當教一切處。若少福德,當教無量心;若欲出色,當教四空。」〔T1716 0786c15〕《大智度論》相近段有「四無量心」〔T1509 0208c20〕,同段續列四無色定等。本論為助道法的結構性撮錄,未得全句連續本。
十七「煗雖有漏有為,還能破壞有漏有為。」〔T1716 0786c27〕《大般涅槃經》作「如是煖法,雖是有為有法,還能破壞有為有法」〔T0374 0577b01〕煗、煖及有漏有為、有為有法異。
十八「我弟子有,外道則無。」〔T1716 0786c28〕《大般涅槃經》同作「我弟子有,外道則無。」〔T0374 0577a10〕逐字相合。
十九「若不得般若方便,則墮有無。」〔T1716 0787a14〕《大智度論》作「若不得般若波羅蜜法,入阿毘曇門則墮有中,若入空門則墮無中」〔T1509 0194a28〕本論撮為般若方便、墮有無。
二十「欲得聲聞緣覺,當學般若。」〔T1716 0787a23〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》分作「欲學聲聞地亦當應聞般若波羅蜜」〔T0223 0234a15〕及「欲學辟支佛地亦當應聞般若波羅蜜」〔T0223 0234a17〕本論合兩句為一。
二十一「聲聞及緣覺,解脫涅槃道,皆從般若得。」〔T1716 0787a24〕《大智度論》作「諸佛及菩薩,聲聞辟支佛,解脫涅槃道,皆從般若得。」〔T1509 0190c19〕本論節去諸佛及菩薩,並以緣覺代辟支佛。
二十二「不為一人、一國、一界微塵人,乃為法界眾生,發菩提心。」〔T1716 0787b15〕《大方廣佛華嚴經》分層作「菩薩不為教化一眾生故,發菩提心」〔T0278 0698c25〕、「不為教化一世界眾生故,發菩提心」〔T0278 0698c28〕、「不為教化閻浮提微塵等眾生故」〔T0278 0699a01〕,後結「欲教化一切眾生故,發菩提心」〔T0278 0699a19〕人、世界、微塵與一切眾生的次序相合,本論撮成一語。

圓門十簡、今經十義與四門

本論形今本對讀關係
二十三「無上道」〔T1716 0788a02〕《妙法蓮華經》多處有「但說無上道」〔T0262 0010a19〕本論以短語指圓門,非可唯一定位的專句。
二十四「而行深妙道」〔T1716 0788a02〕《妙法蓮華經》同作「而行深妙道」〔T0262 0008a09〕逐字相合。
二十五「汝等皆當作佛」〔T1716 0788b14〕《妙法蓮華經》同句見「汝等皆當作佛。」〔T0262 0050c23〕逐字相合。
二十六「我不敢輕於汝等」〔T1716 0788b14〕《妙法蓮華經》同作「我不敢輕於汝等」〔T0262 0050c22〕逐字相合。
二十七「世間治生產業,皆與實相不相違背」〔T1716 0788b16〕《妙法蓮華經》先作「諸所說法,隨其義趣,皆與實相不相違背」〔T0262 0050a22〕,續列俗間經書、治世語言與資生業而結皆順正法〔T0262 0050a24〕本論合兩句,且治生產業、資生業與結語不同。
二十八「汝等所行是菩薩道」〔T1716 0788b17〕《妙法蓮華經》作「汝等所行,是菩薩道」〔T0262 0020b23〕字面相合,今本有逗號。
二十九「汝是我子,我則是父」〔T1716 0788b18〕《妙法蓮華經》作「汝諸人等,皆是吾子,我則是父。」〔T0262 0015a16〕同一父子譬場景,字面有別。
三十「誰有智慧?誰有煩惱?」〔T1716 0788c26〕《大般涅槃經》同作「誰有智慧?誰有煩惱?」〔T0374 0547c23〕逐字相合。
三十一「婬、怒、癡性即是解脫」〔T1716 0788c27〕《維摩詰所說經》作「佛說婬、怒、癡性,即是解脫。」〔T0475 0548a17〕本論節去佛說及句內逗號。
三十二「不斷癡愛起於明脫」〔T1716 0788c28〕《維摩詰所說經》作「不滅癡愛,起於明脫」〔T0475 0540b24〕斷、滅異,今本有逗號。
三十三「闇時無明,明時無闇。有智慧時,則無煩惱。」〔T1716 0788c29〕《大般涅槃經》先作「有智慧時則無煩惱,有煩惱時則無智慧」〔T0374 0547c20〕,後譬「明時無闇,闇時無明」〔T0374 0547c22〕本論倒序撮合兩句,並把末句縮成單向。
三十四「從初一地具足諸地功德。」〔T1716 0789a28〕《大方廣佛華嚴經》作「住於一地,普攝一切諸地功德」〔T0278 0395b25〕從初一地具足、住於一地普攝異。
三十五「初阿字具足四十一字功德。」〔T1716 0789a28〕《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》作「一字皆入四十二字,四十二字亦入一字。」〔T0223 0396b24〕;另作「阿字門,一切法初不生故。」〔T0223 0256a08〕本論以阿字為初,撮成一含四十一;今本分見兩處。
三十六「觀一切法空如實相」〔T1716 0789b19〕《妙法蓮華經》作「觀一切法空,如實相」〔T0262 0037b12〕字面相合,今本有逗號。
三十七「一切世間治生產業,皆與實相不相違背。」〔T1716 0789b21〕同第二十七項所列《妙法蓮華經》兩句〔T0262 0050a22–a24〕本論增一切,仍為兩句撮合。
三十八「開、示、悟、入佛之知見」〔T1716 0789b23〕《妙法蓮華經》分四句說開、示、悟、入佛知見〔T0262 0007a24–a26〕本論抽出四動詞合稱,今本不是一個連續短句。
三十九「著如來衣、座、室等」〔T1716 0789b24〕《妙法蓮華經》作「入如來室,著如來衣,坐如來座」〔T0262 0031c23〕次序為室、衣、座,本論列衣、座、室。
四十「又過五百由旬」〔T1716 0789b25〕《妙法蓮華經》先設「譬如五百由旬險難惡道」〔T0262 0025c26〕,導師後於險道過三百由旬而化城〔T0262 0026a04〕今本無本論連句,本論以二乘已進三百、圓位住五百作義配。
四十一「五品、六根淨」〔T1716 0789b26〕《妙法蓮華經》有「得是六根清淨已」〔T0262 0051a06〕六根淨有直接場景;五品為本論位類,未與之連成今本一語。
四十二「乘寶乘、遊四方」〔T1716 0789b26〕《妙法蓮華經》作「乘是寶車,遊於四方」〔T0262 0014c18〕寶乘、是寶車異。
四十三「佛自住大乘,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」〔T1716 0789b27〕《妙法蓮華經》作「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」〔T0262 0008a23〕本論省如其所得法。
四十四「合掌以敬心,欲聞具足道。」〔T1716 0789b28〕《妙法蓮華經》同作「合掌以敬心,欲聞具足道。」〔T0262 0006c06〕逐字相合。
四十五「諸法實相義,已為汝等說。」〔T1716 0789b29〕《妙法蓮華經》作「諸法實相義,已為汝等說」〔T0262 0005a10〕字面相合,本論自加句號。
四十六「智積、龍女」〔T1716 0789c01〕《妙法蓮華經》先有智積菩薩問文殊師利〔T0262 0035a27〕,後有龍女寶珠及二人對答〔T0262 0035c12〕人名與問答場景可定,非今本連續並列短語。
四十七「輪王頂珠」〔T1716 0789c02〕《妙法蓮華經》輪王譬作「唯髻中明珠,不以與之」〔T0262 0038c28〕頂珠、髻中明珠異,場景相同。
四十八「其車高廣」〔T1716 0789c02〕《妙法蓮華經》同作「其車高廣」〔T0262 0012c18〕逐字相合。
四十九「佛之智慧微妙第一」〔T1716 0789c04〕《妙法蓮華經》作「我所得智慧,微妙最第一」〔T0262 0009c06〕佛之、我所得及第一、最第一異。
五十「我以如來智慧觀彼久遠猶若今也」〔T1716 0789c04〕《妙法蓮華經》作「我以如來知見力故,觀彼久遠,猶若今日。」〔T0262 0022b02〕智慧、知見力故及今也、今日異。

圓門十觀、麁妙與開顯

本論形今本對讀關係
五十一「一切眾生即大涅槃。」〔T1716 0789c15〕《維摩詰所說經》作「諸佛知一切眾生畢竟寂滅,即涅槃相,不復更滅。」〔T0475 0542b18〕場景與義向相近,今本無本論完整短句,且作涅槃相。
五十二「一切眾生即菩提相。不可復得。」〔T1716 0789c20〕《維摩詰所說經》有「一切眾生即菩提相。」〔T0475 0542b16〕首句逐字相合,不可復得未在此句相連。
五十三「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅,諸餘眾生類,無有能得解。」〔T1716 0790b18〕《妙法蓮華經》同作「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅,諸餘眾生類,無有能得解」〔T0262 0005c25〕字面相合,本論自加句號。
五十四「我法妙難思」〔T1716 0790b20〕《妙法蓮華經》同作「我法妙難思」〔T0262 0006c19〕逐字相合。
五十五「我得三菩提時,以神通力、智慧力引之,令得住是法中」〔T1716 0790b21〕《妙法蓮華經》作「我得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提時,隨在何地,以神通力、智慧力引之,令得住是法中。」〔T0262 0038c09〕本論省阿耨多羅三藐與隨在何地。
五十六「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴」〔T1716 0790b23〕《妙法蓮華經》全偈見第四十三項〔T0262 0008a23〕本論此處節去末句。
五十七「斯人行世間,能破眾生闇」〔T1716 0790b26〕《妙法蓮華經》作「斯人行世間,能滅眾生闇」〔T0262 0052b27〕破、滅異。
五十八「有一導師,將導眾人,明了心決定,在嶮濟眾難」〔T1716 0790b27〕《妙法蓮華經》散文有「有一導師,聰慧明達,善知險道通塞之相,將導眾人」〔T0262 0025c28〕;偈有「時有一導師,強識有智慧,明了心決定,在險濟眾難。」〔T0262 0027a04〕本論合散文與偈,且嶮、險異。
五十九「唯有一門而復狹小」〔T1716 0791a26〕《妙法蓮華經》作「是舍唯有一門,而復狹小」〔T0262 0012b25〕本論節去是舍與逗號。
六十「為鈍根人說生空,為利根說法空。」〔T1716 0791b04〕《大智度論》作「二種空:眾生空、法空。小乘弟子鈍根故,為說眾生空」〔T1509 0287b14〕,續作「大乘弟子利根故,為說法空」〔T1509 0287b15〕本論撮去大小乘弟子與故。
六十一「半有半無者,名為鈍人。」〔T1716 0791b07〕《大智度論》作「半有半無,有者,同上有縛;無者,同上無縛。」〔T1509 0254b14〕有半有半無場景,未見名為鈍人連句。
六十二「觀一切法空如實相。」〔T1716 0792b29〕《妙法蓮華經》作「觀一切法空,如實相」〔T0262 0037b12〕字面相合,今本有逗號,本論有句號。
六十三「世間相常住。」〔T1716 0792c01〕《妙法蓮華經》作「世間相常住」〔T0262 0009b10〕逐字相合,本論自加句號。
六十四「一切眾生皆是吾子。」〔T1716 0792c02〕《妙法蓮華經》有「一切眾生,皆是吾子」〔T0262 0014c20〕,父子對句另見第二十九項〔T0262 0015a16〕本論採前者詞面而省逗號。
六十五「若說俗間經書,治生產業,皆與實相不相違背。」〔T1716 0792c04〕同第二十七項所列《妙法蓮華經》兩句〔T0262 0050a22–a24〕治生產業、治世語言與資生業及結語有別;本論合兩句。
六十六「為令眾生開佛知見,示、悟、入等,亦復如是。」〔T1716 0792c05〕《妙法蓮華經》分四句列開、示、悟、入佛知見〔T0262 0007a24–a26〕本論先引開,後以亦復如是攝其三。
六十七「決了聲聞法,是諸經之王。」〔T1716 0792c07〕《妙法蓮華經》作「決了聲聞法。是諸經之王」〔T0262 0032a15〕字面相合,句讀有別。
六十八「佛昔於菩薩前毀訾聲聞,然佛實以大乘而見教化。」〔T1716 0792c08〕《妙法蓮華經》作「而昔於菩薩前,毀呰聲聞樂小法者,然佛實以大乘教化」〔T0262 0017c06〕毀訾、毀呰異;本論省樂小法者,增見字。
六十九「汝等所行是菩薩道。」〔T1716 0792c10〕《妙法蓮華經》作「汝等所行,是菩薩道,漸漸修學,悉當成佛。」〔T0262 0020b23〕首段相合,今本有逗號並續文。
七十「開方便門,示真實相。」〔T1716 0792c11〕《妙法蓮華經》作「此經開方便門,示真實相。」〔T0262 0031c16〕本論省此經。
七十一「菩薩聞是法,疑網悉已除。」〔T1716 0792c13〕《妙法蓮華經》作「菩薩聞是法,疑網皆已除」〔T0262 0010a20〕悉、皆異。

明題而未置於本論引號者

本論說法位置今本定位覆核結果
諸阿毘曇論之所申0784b25阿毘達磨論群本論總指三藏有門,不強繫單一藏號。
恐此是《成實論》之所申0784c01《成實論》T1646 三心滅的空義〔0251b22〕空義相近;石室故事不見今本,『恐』只修飾所申之論。
迦旃延因門入道,故作《昆勒論》0784c05–c07《大智度論》T1509 承載蜫勒三百二十萬言與大迦栴延造說〔0192b03〕未得同題獨立現存本;所指待考,T1509 只是承載文。
犢子阿毘曇申此意0784c11–c14《大智度論》T1509 內引犢子阿毘曇五眾、人不可說藏〔0061a22〕未得獨立現存本;所指待考,不把承載文改題為犢子論本身。
青目注論0785a13–a15《中論》T1564 的三種實相句〔0025b23〕現存所屬可定,字面異同見第十二項。
《須跋陀羅經》0786c10–c13《長阿含經》T0001 有須跋、八聖道與外道無沙門果場景〔0025a29〕;《大智度論》T1509 另有師子吼、外道無道近文〔0081a05〕未得同題單行現存本;記為場景名,所指待考。
五百阿羅漢作《毘婆沙》0787a10《阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論》T1545 題署五百大阿羅漢等造〔0001a05〕人數與造者場景直接相合,今本題名較全。
《思益》有三十二大悲0787b14《思益梵天所問經》T0586 有如來三十二種大悲救護眾生〔0041c06–0042a23〕場景直接相合。
《止觀》0790c17《摩訶止觀》T1911委如之指廣,不是逐字引句。
地論南北二道與攝大乘興0792a13學派與譯系敘述本論未題某一部《十地經論》或某一譯本,不代指定所屬藏號。
《中論》末二品次序0792b20–b24《中論》T1564〈觀十二因緣品第二十六〉〔0036b17〕、〈觀邪見品第二十七〉〔0036c24〕品次可定;先大蕩、後示小門是本論的結構判,不反作根論自稱。

七十一條中兼有同文、節引、合引、倒序、術語撮稱與本論自標,不可統稱逐字引自。法華證文散在多品,應守本論的散引次序,不重排為一段假想經文。《昆勒論》、犢子阿毘曇與《須跋陀羅經》均保留所指待考;《成實論》一項保留本論的『恐』,不把石室故事歸入今本《成實論》。

四、釋籤釋要〔鏡〕

《法華玄義釋籤》(T1717)以來意、正開章解釋總攝本單元,並先判「此中具明十六皆為實門,文中雖無開廢等文,意在第九卷,故此不論。」〔T1717 0937a24〕所謂此處不論,只限開廢之文,不是說十六門不能入實。門相總釋先以「初文五:初釋門名,謂能通也。」〔T1717 0937b02〕點出功能,再把根性分為一向、迴轉與教觀相資。

教門與行門不可混成一物;鏡中明說「教行者,行秖是觀」〔T1717 0937b10〕,故教是所聞能詮,行是所修之觀,二者可因根性互為助緣。入門處與入門觀也有嚴格分工:「處論所通,觀論能入。」〔T1717 0938a14〕前者辨偏真、圓真之所至,後者辨能入的十觀。

藏、通、別各展一門十觀而令其餘三門準例,不表示省略者無觀。釋文明定「但此中文意在教相,故觀法存略。」〔T1717 0938a25〕本論重教相,觀法只撮其綱;藏門仍須依境、發心、安心、破遍、通塞、道品、對治、次位、安忍、離愛十項貫穿始終,通、別諸門亦同此科目而義相各別。

圓門先以界內外有諍、無諍顯其意,再對別門作十重簡別。前七重不是單層對舉,因「然此十意,前之七意皆有三段」〔T1717 0939b05〕:先正辨其義,次判圓別,再由經文前後與行位辨文相所屬。故一見融語,不足逕判為圓;須連同所處行位、破會對象與前後收結而讀。

圓門十觀以一實四諦為境,鏡中把苦、集落回現前心而說「今一念心具十法界苦集」〔T1717 0940c03〕。四諦相即,仍按苦、集、道、滅辨相;十觀次第仍供行者逐節檢校,不因相即而取消發心、定慧、破遍、通塞、對治與離愛。

今經證十觀的文字散在全經,釋文明說「彼《止觀》局引大車,今散引一部」〔T1717 0941a24〕。因此本論的撮句只可依其現有次序說明各觀,不可重排成一段自稱連續的根經文。後半判麁妙的樞紐則是「四門是教、十觀是行,皆通至極」〔T1717 0942a21〕:門法、根機、四悉檀與十觀成壞須合看,門名本身不固定為麁或妙。

開麁時,釋文分明標出「次正開中三:謂凡夫二乘菩薩也。」〔T1717 0943b07〕,二乘之中又辨所詮法、能詮教、所行之行與所契之理。這使末段的『開』有具體對象,不是只把一個抽象方便改名為真實。

五、諸家異釋

智銓《法華經玄籤證釋》(X0592)是本次所見最直接的逐段後證,自「○四、入實門,明行門功能。」〔X0592 0622a15〕起,連續隨釋至開麁末段。它把『恐』的語法說成「空生所見,恐是成實論所申。論是佛滅後造,故云恐。」〔X0592 0622b01〕,可證保留語只落在所申之論;又釋入門處為所至之處,解紆迴為析法明空之智路。至甘毒二果,智銓明記未見翻名,故只守鎮頭迦、迦羅迦音寫與甘毒功能,不作還原。

智旭《法華經玄義節要》(X0589)直接承本單元,起句為「四、明入實相門者。夫實相幽微,其理淵奧,如登絕壑,必假飛梯。」〔X0589 0538a18〕,保留四意、四句門義、教行互資與十六門骨架;至後半自行說「三、示麤妙;四、示開顯。俱不暇錄,可以意得。」〔X0589 0538c07〕。這是編者明示節略,不能倒作本論後兩科沒有材料。

從義《法華經三大部補注》(X0586)在別處以「般若有種種方法,謂四門入清涼池」〔X0586 0165c23〕說般若方法,直接扣合四門為能通、平等大慧為所契之義;但它不是本單元逐句注。

智圓《涅槃經疏三德指歸》(X0662)亦屬跨文本互證。其說「圓教四門即是不生不生句中具四句也。」〔X0662 0548a07〕,可與本論一門即三門、四句仍依機施設互照;其一實相印、四門互趣與四悉檀之說,均須守在該書自身的疏釋語境,不冒稱本單元逐段注。

六、術語

門。 能通之義。教說能引發真解,觀行能契所通之理,故教、行皆可為門;二者相資而不相混。

十六門、三十二門。 四教各用有、空、亦有亦空、非有非無四句詮理,合為十六教門;教、觀合論,大數為三十二。細尋根性、知識、教法與觀行,則門實無量。

入門處、入門觀。 入門處指諸門所通之理:前八門同通偏真,後八門同通圓真。入門觀指能入之行,即境、發心、安心、破遍、通塞、道品、對治、次位、安忍、無法愛十項。

拙度、巧度。 三藏門析法入空,路徑紆迴而窄;通門體法即空,寬直而巧。巧拙判能通之門,不把所通偏真分成兩個。

融、即法。 圓門說一門不隔其餘三門,一切法趣有,有即法界;別門則四門歷別、真善妙有別出生死。是否有『融』字仍須連同經文前後與行位判讀。

不斷斷。 圓門於解惑不二中說斷,不作別門漸次割截之相;其義仍展開破遍、通塞、對治與離愛,並非放任煩惱而廢修。

一實四諦。 生死苦與煩惱集皆即空、即假、即中,苦即無作滅,集即無作道,四諦互融而相狀仍分。一實不是把四諦縮成一項。

十觀。 識境、真正發心、定慧安心、遍破諸法、識通塞、修道品、用對治、知次位、安忍、法愛不生。各門義相不同,十項檢校始終的功能相貫。

麁妙。 先分能通門與所通理,再依門法巧拙、根機相稱、四悉檀得失與十觀成壞判定。同一門若取著則塞,若得宜則通,不由門名單獨定高下。

開麁顯妙。 開愛見、生死、凡夫、言教,以及二乘的法、教、行、理與未圓菩薩,使未妙者入妙;已妙者無所更開。

鎮頭迦、迦羅迦。 本論保留二果音寫,以甘果與毒果判別門十觀正邪;未得安全翻名,不由音形臆還梵語。

七、譬喻、互讀與承衍

飛梯譬教、行為登臨實相的助緣;四門通清涼池,譬不同根性皆可由門入;大火四邊不可取,顯門若不被取著便能溫身熟食、除惑辦事,若執著則邪見反燒法身。不觸火不是棄門不用,而是不取著門相。

偏門、直門同通州城,譬藏、通能入同一偏真而巧拙不同;偏門、直門同通帝城,譬別、圓能入同一圓真而偏融不同。王國通門兼容朝市而正通朝士,則說明大乘門可傍通三乘偏真,不能因兼通便改稱小乘門。

藏門十觀的意象逐項有定向:正因緣不同邪因、無因;定慧如賢人智德兼備;五停心如鑽搖成乳;無常破見如新醫用藥;通塞如識字而非蟲食木;道品通向涅槃城三門;助道如正慧之援;次位防叨濫;安忍使煖、頂、忍相續;離愛方能由四善根入見諦。這些譬各服務於所在觀項,不宜互換。

別門以金藏被草所覆、額珠鬥沒、貧窮孤露發起悲願;大樹不宿怨鳥譬不取二乘沈空,雪山毒草與藥王譬通塞並存。三十七品如寶炬,十相離故入三解脫;內忍善惡兩覺、外忍八風,最後破穢草而顯金藏。

圓別十簡以周璞、鄭璞同名異質辨妙有與外道性實,以金石相糅警邪正混淆;圓門破會則連凡夫、二乘、菩薩及人法一併開會。『一門無量門』不是取消四門施設,而是說一門不隔餘門,仍因四類根性而說四。

圓門十觀先以臨池觀魚而不結網、裹糧束腳而安坐不行,分別警醒解境與發願之後必須實修;定慧如陰陽調適、兩輪均平、二翼俱足;破遍如金剛斧與無翳日;通塞如主兵寶取捨得宜;道品以枯、榮與非枯非榮三層收束,不另造四樹配表;法愛則使人不上不退而滯於頂,須滅愛方能破無明。

講讀而不知十觀方便,如只會擠乳而不會鑽搖製成酪蘇;半珠、全珠之施又問受者是否肯輕生重道、勤心修習。這一組譬從知解轉向行證,不可泛化成只知理論一句而抹去擠乳、製乳的具體動作。

麁妙段以鎮頭迦甘果、迦羅迦毒果逐項對應別門十觀的成與失,本論自說毒果九分、甘果一分;今本《大般涅槃經》則為甘果一分、毒果十分,兩本各守其數。千斤疊華不及真金一兩,顯少分真成勝過多分邪失;四指指一月,顯四門因機有異而所指理一。

法華以金沙大河無復迴曲譬折伏破權門理,涅槃以百川歸海譬攝受諸門;前者著眼路無迴曲,後者著眼同歸一海。存門、廢門之施設有異,歸實則不別,兩譬不可併縮成同一圖像。

全章由門相至觀行,由觀行至麁妙,再由麁妙至開顯:門是能通,理是所通;四教四門不只依名相排等級,而須看能否契機、能否成就十觀;最後所開也不只是一個門名,而是凡夫、二乘、菩薩及法、教、行、理的全幅關係。

八、校本定位

一、本單元以 T1716 為底,正文起於 0784a07,止於 0792c16;卷八下、卷九上與題署三行位於別門、圓門之間,屬傳本框架。

二、本單元校異全量只見一錨,在 0790a10。底本文脈作「若生死即涅槃者,分段、變易,苦諦皆破」〔T1716 0790a10〕,校本正文取苦,大正原字作若;《宗鏡錄》旁證作「若生死即涅槃者。分段變易。苦諦皆破。」〔T2016 0546c18〕。兩形並錄,不作正誤裁決,正文仍守現行底本之苦。

三、引文錨一律取所引首字前最近的同版行號;同行有多枚短引者,各依本枚首字另錨,不沿用引介語或前一引文之行號。

四、開目『入體之門』與正文『入實相門』都是 T1716 傳本實形:前者屬總目,後者屬本單元題面。兩形各守所在,不互校改。

This unit begins from teaching and practice as what can give access to the true mark. It first sets out the sixteen gateways of the four teachings, then turns from the principle accessed to the contemplation by which one enters. It next distinguishes the gateways of the Distinct and Perfect Teachings through ten perspectives, and finally judges the gateways as coarse or wondrous through access and what is accessed, faculties, the four siddhāntas, and the ten contemplations, opening gateways, principles, and people not yet wondrous so that they enter the wondrous. The opening outline has 『入體之門』 tr. “the gateway into the substance,” while the body has 『入實相門』 tr. “gateways into the true mark”; both forms must remain.

Doctrinal-Outline Placement

The opening outline lists 「四、入體之門」 tr. “fourth, the gateway into the substance”〔T1716 0779a14〕. This unit’s body begins with 「○第四明入實相門者,夫實相幽微,其理淵奧」 tr. “Fourth, clarifying the gateways into the true mark: the true mark is subtle and hidden, and its principle profound and deep”〔T1716 0784a07〕 and ends with 「是名開權顯實,決麁令妙也。」 tr. “This is called opening the provisional to reveal the real, deciding the coarse and making it wondrous”〔T1716 0792c16〕. The next line has already turned to 『第五、為一切經體』 tr. “fifth, serving as the substance of all sutras.” The whole text has four major divisions: briefly showing the characteristics of the gateways, showing the contemplation for entering a gateway, showing the coarse and wondrous, and showing opening and revelation. Following the internal transitions of this long unit, it may be divided into eighteen sections:

SectionLocusOutline
1. General statement of the gateway’s intent0784a07–0784a12Uses the flying-ladder simile to show teaching and practice as gateways and states the four intents in general.
2. General explanation of gateway characteristics0784a12–0784b16Uses four propositions to express principle; distinguishes successful and failed uses of a gateway, the mutual support of teaching and practice, and sixteen, thirty-two, and ultimately immeasurable gateways.
3. Four gateways of the Tripiṭaka Teaching0784b17–0784c14The gateways of existence, emptiness, both existence and emptiness, and neither existence nor nonexistence, together with the treatises said to uphold each gateway.
4. Four gateways of the Shared Teaching0784c14–0785a15Embodying form as immediately empty, the mutual identity of emptiness of beings and emptiness of dharmas, and establishing gateways through the four propositions of illusion.
5. Characteristics of the Distinct and Perfect gateways0785a15–0785b05Correlates milk, gold, a jewel, empty space, and other similes with the four gateways of the Distinct Teaching; first marks the Perfect gateways but leaves detailed distinction until later.
6. The point of entering0785b05–0785b28The first eight of the sixteen gateways access partial truth and the latter eight access perfect truth; distinguishes skillful and clumsy, oblique and direct, and the nonduality of what is accessed.
7. Ten contemplations of a Tripiṭaka gateway0785b28–0787a20Practice through faith, practice through Dharma, and the ten contemplations of the gateway of existence; the other three gateways are understood by analogy.
8. Ten contemplations of a Shared gateway0787a20–0787b05The illusory object, the resolve of the three vehicles, and a synopsis of the ten contemplations; the other three gateways are understood by analogy.
9. Ten contemplations of a Distinct gateway0787b05–0787c19Wondrous existence as object, the four universal vows, concentration and wisdom, passage and obstruction, factors of the path, counteractives, stages, endurance, and freedom from attachment.
10. Ten distinctions between the Distinct and Perfect0787c26–0789b16Distinguishes Distinct and Perfect through interpenetration, immediacy to dharmas, buddha-wisdom, sequence, severance, stages, fruit, expression, questions and answers, and similes.
11. Ten meanings in the present sutra and its four perfect gateways0789b16–0789c10Distinguishes the number of gateways according to the five flavors, then proves ten meanings and the four gateways of existence, emptiness, both, and neither from passages in the present sutra.
12. Ten contemplations of a Perfect gateway0789c10–0790b18Beginning from the Four Truths of the one reality, successively unfolds the object, arousing resolve, settling the mind, pervasive breaking, passage and obstruction, factors of the path, counteractives, stages, endurance, and freedom from Dharma attachment.
13. Dispersed evidence in the present sutra and concluding lament0790b18–0790c17Draws passages from across the whole sutra as evidence for the ten contemplations, explains that scriptures and treatises of both vehicles all contain their intent, and points to the fuller account in the Mohe Zhiguan.
14. Coarse and wondrous in access and what is accessed0790c17–0791a01First judges coarse and wondrous through four propositions concerning the gateway that gives access and the principle accessed, then judges them again through the teachings and flavors.
15. Questions and answers on the one narrow gateway0791a01–0791a29For each of the four teachings, distinguishes four gateways and one gateway, and narrowness in teaching, practice, and principle.
16. Judging coarse and wondrous in the four teachings0791a29–0792b01Judges coarse and wondrous through gateway-Dharmas, faculties, the four siddhāntas, and the success or failure of the ten contemplations; uses the sweet and poisonous fruits to illustrate the ten contemplations of a Distinct gateway.
17. Judging coarse and wondrous through the five flavors0792b01–0792b19Lists the coarse and wondrous gateways and principles in the five flavors and distinguishes the Lotus Sutra’s subduing from the Nirvāṇa Sūtra’s embracing.
18. Opening the coarse to reveal the wondrous0792b19–0792c16Contrasts the order of presentation in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā; opens ordinary beings, the two vehicles, and bodhisattvas, together with the śrāvakas’ Dharma, teaching, practice, and principle.

Fascicle eight, lower half, ends after the ten contemplations of the Distinct gateway. Only after the title of fascicle nine, upper half, and Zhiyi’s attribution does the text continue with contemplation for entering the real through the Perfect gateway. The fascicle titles, fascicle sequence, and attribution belong to the transmitted frame and do not constitute a separate doctrinal section. No marker such as 『私』 tr. “privately” or 『記者釋曰』 tr. “the recorder explains” occurs anywhere in this unit; the existing attribution therefore identifies Zhiyi as speaker and Guanding as recorder.

Formation and Transmission

The origin account in the root treatise records that Zhiyi taught at Jiangling Monastery, that Guanding heard and recorded the teaching, and that the Xuanyi and Wenju each consisted of ten fascicles〔T1716 0681a16–a23〕.

Scriptures and Treatises Cited by Zhiyi

Works Cited

The titles in the following table follow the headings of the respective canonical editions. Representative locations identify only the scenes actually compared in this unit.

Root-text abbreviation or useCanonical titleCanon no.Representative locusPlacement
Fahua, the present sutra, the sutra, the textSutra of the Lotus Blossom of the Wondrous DharmaT02620013c04, etc.The work most frequently cited throughout this unit.
Great Treatise, Explanatory TreatiseGreat Treatise on the Perfection of WisdomT15090061b14, etc.The four propositions, four gateways, fire simile, counteractives, and the two kinds of emptiness.
Great CollectionGreat Vaipulya Collection SūtraT03970013c13The verse on Kauṇḍinya seeing the real meaning.
Greater PrajñāMahāprajñāpāramitā SūtraT02230234a15, etc.The two vehicles’ study of prajñā, constant emptiness of nature, and the letter gateway A.
AvataṃsakaMahāvaipulya Buddhāvataṃsaka SūtraT02780698c25, 0395b25Arousing resolve for sentient beings throughout the Dharma realm and one ground encompassing all grounds.
Great Sūtra, NirvāṇaMahāparinirvāṇa SūtraT03740518b16, etc.The similes for the Distinct gateways, the warmth-dharma, wisdom and delusion, sweet and poisonous fruits, and the nature of peace and happiness.
VimalakīrtiVimalakīrti SūtraT04750542b16, etc.The marks of bodhi and nirvāṇa, the nature of lust, anger, and delusion, and luminous liberation.
SīyiSūtra Requested by Brahmā ViśeṣacintinT05860041c06The thirty-two kinds of great compassion.
Piṅgala’s annotated treatise, MūlamadhyamakakārikāMūlamadhyamakakārikāT15640025b23, 0033b11Three kinds of true mark, the verse on dependently arisen dharmas, and the final two chapters.
Satyasiddhi TreatiseSatyasiddhi TreatiseT16460251b22The cessation of the three minds can serve as nearby evidence for the meaning of emptiness; it does not contain the stone-chamber story.
VibhāṣāAbhidharma Mahāvibhāṣā TreatiseT15450001a05The title credits five hundred great arhats and others as compilers.
Extant carrier of the scene called the Subhadra SūtraDīrgha ĀgamaT00010025a29The scene of Subhadra and the noble eightfold path occurs within this sutra, not in a separately extant work of the same title.
Corroboration for the ten characteristicsAbhidharmakośabhāṣyaT15580149c21The later explanation says its wording agrees; the root text gives only a synopsis.
Pointer to the fuller ZhiguanMohe ZhiguanT19110001a03–a06The root treatise only points readers to the fuller account.
Corroboration for the critical noteZongjing luT20160546c18Used only as collateral evidence for the transmitted variant.

Gateway Meanings, the Four Teachings, and the First Three Teachings’ Ten Contemplations

No.Form in the Root TreatiseComparison with the Received TextRelation
1「以佛教門出三界苦。」 tr. “Through the gateway of the Buddha’s teaching one leaves the suffering of the three realms”〔T1716 0784a09〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「以佛教門出三界苦」 tr. “Through the gateway of the Buddha’s teaching one leaves the suffering of the three realms”〔T0262 0013c04〕The wording agrees; the root treatise supplies final punctuation.
2「佛子行道已,來世得作佛。」 tr. “After children of the Buddha have practiced the path, in a future life they will attain buddhahood”〔T1716 0784a10〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「佛子行道已,來世得作佛」 tr. “After children of the Buddha have practiced the path, in a future life they will attain buddhahood”〔T0262 0008b26〕The wording agrees; the received verse continues beyond it.
3「於如是法,說第一義悉檀,所謂一切實,一切不實,一切亦實亦不實,一切非實非不實。」 tr. “Concerning such a Dharma, the siddhānta of ultimate meaning is taught, namely: everything is real; everything is unreal; everything is both real and unreal; everything is neither real nor unreal”〔T1716 0784a14〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom reads 「一切實一切非實,及一切實亦非實,一切非實非不實,是名諸法之實相。」 tr. “Everything is real; everything is not real; and everything is both real and not real; everything is neither real nor not real—this is called the true mark of all dharmas”〔T1509 0061b14〕Both are four propositions of the siddhānta of ultimate meaning; 『不實』 tr. “unreal” differs from 『非實』 tr. “not real,” as do the presence of 『及』 tr. “and” and the concluding clause.
4「入實相門」 tr. “gateways into the true mark”〔T1716 0784a18〕An internal designation within the root treatise.Not a quotation from an external work.
5「四門入清涼池」 tr. “four gateways enter the cooling pool”〔T1716 0784a18〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom first reads 「譬如熱時,清涼池,有目有足皆可入」 tr. “It is like a cooling pool in hot weather: all who have eyes and feet can enter”〔T1509 0640c10〕 and continues 「四門、般若波羅蜜池亦如是」 tr. “The four gateways and the pool of prajñāpāramitā are also like this”〔T1509 0640c11〕The scene agrees; the root treatise condenses it into a single expression.
6「般若有四種相,所謂有相、無相、乃至非有、非無相。」 tr. “Prajñā has four kinds of characteristic: the characteristic of existence, the characteristic of nonexistence, and so forth through the characteristic of neither existence nor nonexistence”〔T1716 0784a20〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom reads 「諸法有四種相:一者說有,二者說無,三者說亦有亦無,四者說非有非無。」 tr. “Dharmas have four kinds of characteristic: first, they are said to exist; second, not to exist; third, both to exist and not exist; fourth, neither to exist nor not exist”〔T1509 0517b22〕The fourfold structure agrees, while the subject and form of enumeration differ.
7「般若波羅蜜譬如大火焰,四邊不可取,邪見火燒故。」 tr. “Prajñāpāramitā is like a great blaze: none of its four sides can be grasped, because the fire of wrong views will burn one”〔T1716 0784a23〕The verse in the Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom reads 「般若波羅蜜,譬如大火焰,四邊不可取,無取亦不取。」 tr. “Prajñāpāramitā is like a great blaze: none of its four sides can be grasped, and nongrasping is likewise not grasped”〔T1509 0190c23〕. Its prose explanation separately reads 「譬如火焰,四邊不可觸,以燒手故;般若波羅蜜相,亦如是不可觸,以邪見火燒故。」 tr. “It is like a flame whose four sides cannot be touched because it will burn the hand. The characteristic of prajñāpāramitā likewise cannot be touched because the fire of wrong views will burn one”〔T1509 0139c19〕The root treatise combines the verse with its prose explanation into one sentence.
8「說種種法門,宣示於佛道。」 tr. “Teaching various Dharma-gateways, they proclaim and reveal the Buddha-path”〔T1716 0784b16〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「以種種法門,宣示於佛道」 tr. “Through various Dharma-gateways, they proclaim and reveal the Buddha-path”〔T0262 0009b22〕『說』 tr. “teaching” differs from 『以』 tr. “through.”
9「甚深之理不可說,第一實義無聲字,陳如比丘於諸法,獲得真實之知見。」 tr. “The profound principle cannot be spoken; the first real meaning has neither sound nor graph. The monk Chenru attained true knowledge and vision concerning all dharmas”〔T1716 0784b23〕The Great Vaipulya Collection Sūtra reads 「甚深之義不可說,第一實義無聲字,憍陳比丘於諸法,獲得真實之知見」 tr. “The profound meaning cannot be spoken; the first real meaning has neither sound nor graph. The monk Jiaocheng attained true knowledge and vision concerning all dharmas”〔T0397 0013c13〕『理』 tr. “principle” differs from 『義』 tr. “meaning,” and 『陳如』 tr. “Chenru” from 『憍陳』 tr. “Jiaocheng.”
10「佛告比丘:觀空即疊,觀疊即空。」 tr. “The Buddha told the monk: contemplating emptiness is precisely cloth, and contemplating cloth is precisely emptiness”〔T1716 0784c19〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom has 「是疊隨心有」 tr. “This cloth exists in dependence on mind”〔T1509 0148a04〕The received text securely preserves the scene of cloth depending on mind, but the root treatise’s complete dialogic sentence has not been found.
11「一切實一切不實,一切亦實亦不實,一切非實非不實。」 tr. “Everything is real; everything is unreal; everything is both real and unreal; everything is neither real nor unreal”〔T1716 0785a01〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom has the four propositions listed in item 3〔T1509 0061b14〕『不實』 tr. “unreal” differs from 『非實』 tr. “not real,” as do the linking words.
12「諸法實相有三種。」 tr. “The true mark of dharmas has three kinds”〔T1716 0785a14〕The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā reads 「佛說實相有三種」 tr. “The Buddha teaches that the true mark has three kinds”〔T1564 0025b23〕『諸法』 tr. “dharmas” differs from 『佛說』 tr. “the Buddha teaches.”
13「亦名為假名」 tr. “also called a provisional name”〔T1716 0785a16〕The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā reads 「亦為是假名」 tr. “is also a provisional name”〔T1564 0033b12〕『名為』 tr. “called” differs from 『為是』 tr. “is.”
14「色若麁若細,總而觀之,無常無我。」 tr. “Whether form is coarse or subtle, contemplating it as a whole, it is impermanent and without self”〔T1716 0785c18〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom reads 「色若麁若細,若內若外,總而觀之,無常無我。」 tr. “Whether form is coarse or subtle, internal or external, contemplating it as a whole, it is impermanent and without self”〔T1509 0148a03〕The root treatise omits 『若內若外』 tr. “internal or external.”
15「但修無常,可以得道,可以得通。」 tr. “Simply cultivate impermanence: one can attain the path and attain supernormal power”〔T1716 0786b08〕The referent remains under investigation.The root treatise attributes the statement to five hundred monks speaking to Datou; no uniquely bindable continuous sentence has been found in an extant witness.
16「貪欲起,教修不淨,背捨等;緣中不自在,當教勝處;緣中不廣普,當教一切處。若少福德,當教無量心;若欲出色,當教四空。」 tr. “When desire arises, teach the cultivation of impurity, the liberations, and so forth. When one lacks mastery of objects, teach the spheres of mastery. When one is not broad and universal in relation to objects, teach the totalities. If one has little merit, teach the immeasurable minds; if one wishes to transcend form, teach the four formless attainments”〔T1716 0786c15〕A nearby passage in the Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom has 「四無量心」 tr. “the four immeasurable minds”〔T1509 0208c20〕 and continues by listing the four formless concentrations and related items.The root treatise gives a structured synopsis of auxiliary-path Dharmas; its full wording has not been found as a continuous passage.
17「煗雖有漏有為,還能破壞有漏有為。」 tr. “Although warmth is contaminated and conditioned, it can nevertheless destroy what is contaminated and conditioned”〔T1716 0786c27〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra reads 「如是煖法,雖是有為有法,還能破壞有為有法」 tr. “Although such a warmth-dharma is conditioned and existent, it can nevertheless destroy what is conditioned and existent”〔T0374 0577b01〕『煗』 and 『煖』 are variant graphs for “warmth,” while 『有漏有為』 tr. “contaminated and conditioned” differs from 『有為有法』 tr. “conditioned and existent.”
18「我弟子有,外道則無。」 tr. “My disciples possess it; non-Buddhists do not”〔T1716 0786c28〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra likewise reads 「我弟子有,外道則無。」 tr. “My disciples possess it; non-Buddhists do not”〔T0374 0577a10〕The wording agrees exactly.
19「若不得般若方便,則墮有無。」 tr. “If one does not obtain the skillful means of prajñā, one falls into existence or nonexistence”〔T1716 0787a14〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom reads 「若不得般若波羅蜜法,入阿毘曇門則墮有中,若入空門則墮無中」 tr. “If one does not obtain the Dharma of prajñāpāramitā, entering an Abhidharma gateway one falls into existence, and entering the gateway of emptiness one falls into nonexistence”〔T1509 0194a28〕The root treatise condenses this as the skillful means of prajñā and falling into existence or nonexistence.
20「欲得聲聞緣覺,當學般若。」 tr. “If one wishes to attain śrāvakahood or pratyekabuddhahood, one should study prajñā”〔T1716 0787a23〕The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra separately reads 「欲學聲聞地亦當應聞般若波羅蜜」 tr. “One who wishes to train in the śrāvaka ground should also hear prajñāpāramitā”〔T0223 0234a15〕 and 「欲學辟支佛地亦當應聞般若波羅蜜」 tr. “One who wishes to train in the pratyekabuddha ground should also hear prajñāpāramitā”〔T0223 0234a17〕The root treatise combines the two sentences into one.
21「聲聞及緣覺,解脫涅槃道,皆從般若得。」 tr. “Śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas obtain the path of liberation and nirvāṇa entirely from prajñā”〔T1716 0787a24〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom reads 「諸佛及菩薩,聲聞辟支佛,解脫涅槃道,皆從般若得。」 tr. “Buddhas and bodhisattvas, śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas, obtain the path of liberation and nirvāṇa entirely from prajñā”〔T1509 0190c19〕The root treatise removes the buddhas and bodhisattvas and replaces 『辟支佛』 tr. “pratyekabuddhas” with 『緣覺』 tr. “those awakened through conditions.”
22「不為一人、一國、一界微塵人,乃為法界眾生,發菩提心。」 tr. “Not for one person, one country, or people as numerous as the dust motes in one realm, but for the sentient beings of the Dharma realm does one arouse the mind of bodhi”〔T1716 0787b15〕The Mahāvaipulya Buddhāvataṃsaka Sūtra presents in stages 「菩薩不為教化一眾生故,發菩提心」 tr. “A bodhisattva does not arouse the mind of bodhi in order to teach and transform one sentient being”〔T0278 0698c25〕, 「不為教化一世界眾生故,發菩提心」 tr. “does not arouse the mind of bodhi in order to teach and transform the sentient beings of one world”〔T0278 0698c28〕, and 「不為教化閻浮提微塵等眾生故」 tr. “not in order to teach and transform sentient beings as numerous as the dust motes of Jambudvīpa”〔T0278 0699a01〕, before concluding 「欲教化一切眾生故,發菩提心」 tr. “one arouses the mind of bodhi because one wishes to teach and transform all sentient beings”〔T0278 0699a19〕The sequence of one person, a world, dust motes, and all sentient beings agrees; the root treatise condenses it into one expression.

Ten Distinctions of the Perfect Gateway, Ten Meanings in the Present Sutra, and Its Four Gateways

No.Form in the Root TreatiseComparison with the Received TextRelation
23「無上道」 tr. “the unsurpassed path”〔T1716 0788a02〕The Lotus Sutra repeatedly has 「但說無上道」 tr. “teaching only the unsurpassed path”〔T0262 0010a19〕The root treatise uses the short phrase to indicate a Perfect gateway; it is not uniquely locatable as one particular sentence.
24「而行深妙道」 tr. “and practices the profound and wondrous path”〔T1716 0788a02〕The Lotus Sutra likewise reads 「而行深妙道」 tr. “and practices the profound and wondrous path”〔T0262 0008a09〕The wording agrees exactly.
25「汝等皆當作佛」 tr. “You all shall become buddhas”〔T1716 0788b14〕The Lotus Sutra has the same sentence, 「汝等皆當作佛。」 tr. “You all shall become buddhas”〔T0262 0050c23〕The wording agrees exactly.
26「我不敢輕於汝等」 tr. “I would not dare slight you”〔T1716 0788b14〕The Lotus Sutra likewise reads 「我不敢輕於汝等」 tr. “I would not dare slight you”〔T0262 0050c22〕The wording agrees exactly.
27「世間治生產業,皆與實相不相違背」 tr. “Worldly livelihood and productive activity are all not contrary to the true mark”〔T1716 0788b16〕The Lotus Sutra first reads 「諸所說法,隨其義趣,皆與實相不相違背」 tr. “All the Dharmas one teaches, according with their import, are not contrary to the true mark”〔T0262 0050a22〕, then lists secular writings, language for governing the world, and the occupations of livelihood before concluding that all accord with the true Dharma〔T0262 0050a24〕The root treatise combines two sentences; 『治生產業』 tr. “livelihood and productive activity” also differs from 『資生業』 tr. “the occupations of livelihood” and from the received conclusion.
28「汝等所行是菩薩道」 tr. “What you practice is the bodhisattva-path”〔T1716 0788b17〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「汝等所行,是菩薩道」 tr. “What you practice is the bodhisattva-path”〔T0262 0020b23〕The wording agrees; the received text has a comma.
29「汝是我子,我則是父」 tr. “You are my child, and I am the father”〔T1716 0788b18〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「汝諸人等,皆是吾子,我則是父。」 tr. “All of you people are my children, and I am the father”〔T0262 0015a16〕The scene is the same father-and-children simile, while the wording differs.
30「誰有智慧?誰有煩惱?」 tr. “Who possesses wisdom? Who possesses afflictions?”〔T1716 0788c26〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra likewise reads 「誰有智慧?誰有煩惱?」 tr. “Who possesses wisdom? Who possesses afflictions?”〔T0374 0547c23〕The wording agrees exactly.
31「婬、怒、癡性即是解脫」 tr. “The nature of lust, anger, and delusion is precisely liberation”〔T1716 0788c27〕The Vimalakīrti Sūtra reads 「佛說婬、怒、癡性,即是解脫。」 tr. “The Buddha teaches that the nature of lust, anger, and delusion is precisely liberation”〔T0475 0548a17〕The root treatise removes 『佛說』 tr. “the Buddha teaches” and the internal comma.
32「不斷癡愛起於明脫」 tr. “Without severing delusion and craving, one gives rise to luminous liberation”〔T1716 0788c28〕The Vimalakīrti Sūtra reads 「不滅癡愛,起於明脫」 tr. “Without extinguishing delusion and craving, one gives rise to luminous liberation”〔T0475 0540b24〕『斷』 tr. “severing” differs from 『滅』 tr. “extinguishing”; the received text also has a comma.
33「闇時無明,明時無闇。有智慧時,則無煩惱。」 tr. “When it is dark there is no light; when it is light there is no darkness. When wisdom is present, there are no afflictions”〔T1716 0788c29〕The Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra first reads 「有智慧時則無煩惱,有煩惱時則無智慧」 tr. “When wisdom is present there are no afflictions; when afflictions are present there is no wisdom”〔T0374 0547c20〕 and later gives the simile 「明時無闇,闇時無明」 tr. “When it is light there is no darkness; when it is dark there is no light”〔T0374 0547c22〕The root treatise reverses and combines the two sentences and condenses the final statement into one direction.
34「從初一地具足諸地功德。」 tr. “From the very first ground one possesses the virtues of all grounds”〔T1716 0789a28〕The Mahāvaipulya Buddhāvataṃsaka Sūtra reads 「住於一地,普攝一切諸地功德」 tr. “Abiding in one ground, one universally encompasses the virtues of all grounds”〔T0278 0395b25〕『從初一地具足』 tr. “from the very first ground one possesses” differs from 『住於一地普攝』 tr. “abiding in one ground one universally encompasses.”
35「初阿字具足四十一字功德。」 tr. “The initial graph possesses the virtues of the other forty-one graphs”〔T1716 0789a28〕The Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra reads 「一字皆入四十二字,四十二字亦入一字。」 tr. “Every single graph enters the forty-two graphs, and the forty-two graphs also enter a single graph”〔T0223 0396b24〕 and elsewhere reads 「阿字門,一切法初不生故。」 tr. “The gateway of the graph , because all dharmas are unborn from the outset”〔T0223 0256a08〕The root treatise takes as the first graph and condenses the two places into one graph containing the other forty-one.
36「觀一切法空如實相」 tr. “Contemplate all dharmas as empty, as the true mark”〔T1716 0789b19〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「觀一切法空,如實相」 tr. “Contemplate all dharmas as empty, as the true mark”〔T0262 0037b12〕The wording agrees; the received text has a comma.
37「一切世間治生產業,皆與實相不相違背。」 tr. “All worldly livelihood and productive activity are not contrary to the true mark”〔T1716 0789b21〕The same two Lotus Sutra sentences listed in item 27〔T0262 0050a22–a24〕The root treatise adds 『一切』 tr. “all” and still combines the two sentences.
38「開、示、悟、入佛之知見」 tr. “opening, revealing, awakening to, and entering the Buddha’s knowing-and-seeing”〔T1716 0789b23〕The Lotus Sutra states opening, revealing, awakening to, and entering the Buddha’s knowing-and-seeing in four separate sentences〔T0262 0007a24–a26〕The root treatise extracts and combines the four verbs; the received text does not have this as one continuous phrase.
39「著如來衣、座、室等」 tr. “putting on the Tathāgata’s robe, together with the seat, room, and so forth”〔T1716 0789b24〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「入如來室,著如來衣,坐如來座」 tr. “enter the Tathāgata’s room, put on the Tathāgata’s robe, and sit on the Tathāgata’s seat”〔T0262 0031c23〕The received order is room, robe, seat; the root treatise lists robe, seat, room.
40「又過五百由旬」 tr. “and further passes five hundred yojanas”〔T1716 0789b25〕The Lotus Sutra first establishes 「譬如五百由旬險難惡道」 tr. “suppose there were a difficult and dangerous road five hundred yojanas long”〔T0262 0025c26〕; later, after the guide has led them three hundred yojanas along the dangerous road, he conjures the city〔T0262 0026a04〕The received text has no continuous sentence matching the root treatise. The root treatise correlates the two vehicles with advancing three hundred yojanas and the perfect stage with remaining at five hundred.
41「五品、六根淨」 tr. “the five grades and purification of the six faculties”〔T1716 0789b26〕The Lotus Sutra has the direct scene 「得是六根清淨已」 tr. “after attaining this purification of the six faculties”〔T0262 0051a06〕Purification of the six faculties has a direct scriptural scene; the five grades are a stage category in the root treatise and do not occur joined to it as one phrase in the received text.
42「乘寶乘、遊四方」 tr. “riding the jeweled vehicle and traveling in the four directions”〔T1716 0789b26〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「乘是寶車,遊於四方」 tr. “riding this jeweled cart and traveling in the four directions”〔T0262 0014c18〕『寶乘』 tr. “jeweled vehicle” differs from 『是寶車』 tr. “this jeweled cart.”
43「佛自住大乘,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」 tr. “The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle, adorned by the powers of concentration and wisdom, and uses it to liberate sentient beings”〔T1716 0789b27〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴,以此度眾生。」 tr. “The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and, according to the Dharma he has attained, is adorned by the powers of concentration and wisdom, using it to liberate sentient beings”〔T0262 0008a23〕The root treatise omits 『如其所得法』 tr. “according to the Dharma he has attained.”
44「合掌以敬心,欲聞具足道。」 tr. “With palms joined and a reverent mind, they wish to hear the complete path”〔T1716 0789b28〕The Lotus Sutra likewise reads 「合掌以敬心,欲聞具足道。」 tr. “With palms joined and a reverent mind, they wish to hear the complete path”〔T0262 0006c06〕The wording agrees exactly.
45「諸法實相義,已為汝等說。」 tr. “The meaning of the true mark of all dharmas has already been taught to you”〔T1716 0789b29〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「諸法實相義,已為汝等說」 tr. “The meaning of the true mark of all dharmas has already been taught to you”〔T0262 0005a10〕The wording agrees; the root treatise supplies final punctuation.
46「智積、龍女」 tr. “Wisdom Accumulation and the dragon girl”〔T1716 0789c01〕In the Lotus Sutra, Wisdom Accumulation Bodhisattva first questions Mañjuśrī〔T0262 0035a27〕, and the dragon girl’s jewel and the exchanges between the two appear later〔T0262 0035c12〕The figures and question-and-answer scene can be securely identified; the two names do not form a continuous phrase in the received text.
47「輪王頂珠」 tr. “the wheel-turning king’s jewel at his crown”〔T1716 0789c02〕The wheel-turning king simile in the Lotus Sutra reads 「唯髻中明珠,不以與之」 tr. “Only the bright jewel in his topknot he does not give them”〔T0262 0038c28〕『頂珠』 tr. “jewel at his crown” differs from 『髻中明珠』 tr. “bright jewel in his topknot”; the scene is the same.
48「其車高廣」 tr. “its cart is high and broad”〔T1716 0789c02〕The Lotus Sutra likewise reads 「其車高廣」 tr. “its cart is high and broad”〔T0262 0012c18〕The wording agrees exactly.
49「佛之智慧微妙第一」 tr. “the Buddha’s wisdom is subtle, wondrous, and foremost”〔T1716 0789c04〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「我所得智慧,微妙最第一」 tr. “The wisdom I have attained is subtle, wondrous, and supremely foremost”〔T0262 0009c06〕『佛之』 tr. “the Buddha’s” differs from 『我所得』 tr. “I have attained,” and 『第一』 tr. “foremost” from 『最第一』 tr. “supremely foremost.”
50「我以如來智慧觀彼久遠猶若今也」 tr. “With the Tathāgata’s wisdom I contemplate that distant past as if it were now”〔T1716 0789c04〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「我以如來知見力故,觀彼久遠,猶若今日。」 tr. “Through the power of the Tathāgata’s knowing and seeing, I contemplate that distant past as if it were today”〔T0262 0022b02〕『智慧』 tr. “wisdom” differs from 『知見力故』 tr. “through the power of knowing and seeing,” and 『今也』 tr. “now” from 『今日』 tr. “today.”

The Perfect Gateway’s Ten Contemplations, Coarse and Wondrous, and Opening and Revelation

No.Form in the Root TreatiseComparison with the Received TextRelation
51「一切眾生即大涅槃。」 tr. “All sentient beings are precisely great nirvāṇa”〔T1716 0789c15〕The Vimalakīrti Sūtra reads 「諸佛知一切眾生畢竟寂滅,即涅槃相,不復更滅。」 tr. “The buddhas know that all sentient beings are ultimately quiescent and extinct, precisely the mark of nirvāṇa, and are not to be extinguished again”〔T0475 0542b18〕The scene and doctrinal direction are close, but the received text does not have the root treatise’s complete short sentence and speaks of the mark of nirvāṇa.
52「一切眾生即菩提相。不可復得。」 tr. “All sentient beings are precisely the mark of bodhi. It cannot be attained again”〔T1716 0789c20〕The Vimalakīrti Sūtra has 「一切眾生即菩提相。」 tr. “All sentient beings are precisely the mark of bodhi”〔T0475 0542b16〕The first sentence agrees exactly; 『不可復得』 tr. “cannot be attained again” is not joined to it at this location.
53「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅,諸餘眾生類,無有能得解。」 tr. “This Dharma cannot be shown; the characteristics of words are quiescent and extinct. None among the remaining kinds of sentient beings can understand it”〔T1716 0790b18〕The Lotus Sutra likewise reads 「是法不可示,言辭相寂滅,諸餘眾生類,無有能得解」 tr. “This Dharma cannot be shown; the characteristics of words are quiescent and extinct. None among the remaining kinds of sentient beings can understand it”〔T0262 0005c25〕The wording agrees; the root treatise supplies final punctuation.
54「我法妙難思」 tr. “My Dharma is wondrous and difficult to conceive”〔T1716 0790b20〕The Lotus Sutra likewise reads 「我法妙難思」 tr. “My Dharma is wondrous and difficult to conceive”〔T0262 0006c19〕The wording agrees exactly.
55「我得三菩提時,以神通力、智慧力引之,令得住是法中」 tr. “When I attain complete awakening, I will draw them with the power of supernormal penetration and the power of wisdom and enable them to abide in this Dharma”〔T1716 0790b21〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「我得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提時,隨在何地,以神通力、智慧力引之,令得住是法中。」 tr. “When I attain unsurpassed complete awakening, wherever they may be, I will draw them with the power of supernormal penetration and the power of wisdom and enable them to abide in this Dharma”〔T0262 0038c09〕The root treatise omits 『阿耨多羅三藐』 tr. “unsurpassed” and 『隨在何地』 tr. “wherever they may be.”
56「佛自住大乘,如其所得法,定慧力莊嚴」 tr. “The Buddha himself abides in the Great Vehicle and, according to the Dharma he has attained, is adorned by the powers of concentration and wisdom”〔T1716 0790b23〕The complete verse in the Lotus Sutra appears in item 43〔T0262 0008a23〕At this point the root treatise omits the final clause.
57「斯人行世間,能破眾生闇」 tr. “This person travels through the world and can break the darkness of sentient beings”〔T1716 0790b26〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「斯人行世間,能滅眾生闇」 tr. “This person travels through the world and can extinguish the darkness of sentient beings”〔T0262 0052b27〕『破』 tr. “break” differs from 『滅』 tr. “extinguish.”
58「有一導師,將導眾人,明了心決定,在嶮濟眾難」 tr. “There is a guide who will lead the people; clear and resolute in mind, he saves the multitude amid dangers”〔T1716 0790b27〕The prose of the Lotus Sutra has 「有一導師,聰慧明達,善知險道通塞之相,將導眾人」 tr. “There is a guide, intelligent, wise, and discerning, who well knows the characteristics of passage and obstruction on the dangerous road and will lead the people”〔T0262 0025c28〕. The verse has 「時有一導師,強識有智慧,明了心決定,在險濟眾難。」 tr. “At that time there was a guide, keenly perceptive and wise, clear and resolute in mind, who saved the multitude amid dangers”〔T0262 0027a04〕The root treatise combines the prose and verse, and 『嶮』 and 『險』 are variant graphs for “danger.”
59「唯有一門而復狹小」 tr. “There is only one gateway, and moreover it is narrow”〔T1716 0791a26〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「是舍唯有一門,而復狹小」 tr. “This house has only one gateway, and moreover it is narrow”〔T0262 0012b25〕The root treatise omits 『是舍』 tr. “this house” and the comma.
60「為鈍根人說生空,為利根說法空。」 tr. “For people of dull faculties, the emptiness of beings is taught; for those of sharp faculties, the emptiness of dharmas is taught”〔T1716 0791b04〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom reads 「二種空:眾生空、法空。小乘弟子鈍根故,為說眾生空」 tr. “There are two kinds of emptiness: emptiness of sentient beings and emptiness of dharmas. Because Lesser Vehicle disciples have dull faculties, the emptiness of sentient beings is taught for them”〔T1509 0287b14〕 and continues 「大乘弟子利根故,為說法空」 tr. “Because Great Vehicle disciples have sharp faculties, the emptiness of dharmas is taught for them”〔T1509 0287b15〕The root treatise condenses away the Lesser and Great Vehicle disciples and the word 『故』 tr. “because.”
61「半有半無者,名為鈍人。」 tr. “One who is half in existence and half in nonexistence is called a dull person”〔T1716 0791b07〕The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom reads 「半有半無,有者,同上有縛;無者,同上無縛。」 tr. “Half existent and half nonexistent: as to the existent, it is bound by existence as above; as to the nonexistent, it is unbound by nonexistence as above”〔T1509 0254b14〕The scene of half existence and half nonexistence is present, but the continuous phrase 『名為鈍人』 tr. “is called a dull person” has not been found.
62「觀一切法空如實相。」 tr. “Contemplate all dharmas as empty, as the true mark”〔T1716 0792b29〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「觀一切法空,如實相」 tr. “Contemplate all dharmas as empty, as the true mark”〔T0262 0037b12〕The wording agrees; the received text has a comma and the root treatise a period.
63「世間相常住。」 tr. “The characteristics of the world constantly abide”〔T1716 0792c01〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「世間相常住」 tr. “The characteristics of the world constantly abide”〔T0262 0009b10〕The wording agrees exactly; the root treatise supplies final punctuation.
64「一切眾生皆是吾子。」 tr. “All sentient beings are my children”〔T1716 0792c02〕The Lotus Sutra has 「一切眾生,皆是吾子」 tr. “All sentient beings are my children”〔T0262 0014c20〕; the paired father-and-children sentence occurs separately in item 29〔T0262 0015a16〕The root treatise follows the wording of the former and omits its comma.
65「若說俗間經書,治生產業,皆與實相不相違背。」 tr. “If one teaches secular scriptures and writings, livelihood and productive activity, all are not contrary to the true mark”〔T1716 0792c04〕The same two Lotus Sutra sentences listed in item 27〔T0262 0050a22–a24〕『治生產業』 tr. “livelihood and productive activity” differs from 『治世語言』 tr. “language for governing the world” and 『資生業』 tr. “the occupations of livelihood,” as does the concluding wording; the root treatise combines the two sentences.
66「為令眾生開佛知見,示、悟、入等,亦復如是。」 tr. “In order to enable sentient beings to open the Buddha’s knowing-and-seeing; revealing, awakening to, entering, and so forth are likewise the same”〔T1716 0792c05〕The Lotus Sutra separately lists opening, revealing, awakening to, and entering the Buddha’s knowing-and-seeing in four sentences〔T0262 0007a24–a26〕The root treatise first cites opening and then gathers the other three under 『亦復如是』 tr. “are likewise the same.”
67「決了聲聞法,是諸經之王。」 tr. “It definitively resolves the Dharma of the śrāvakas and is king among the sutras”〔T1716 0792c07〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「決了聲聞法。是諸經之王」 tr. “It definitively resolves the Dharma of the śrāvakas. It is king among the sutras”〔T0262 0032a15〕The wording agrees; the sentence division differs.
68「佛昔於菩薩前毀訾聲聞,然佛實以大乘而見教化。」 tr. “In the past the Buddha disparaged śrāvakas before the bodhisattvas, yet in truth the Buddha taught and transformed them through the Great Vehicle”〔T1716 0792c08〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「而昔於菩薩前,毀呰聲聞樂小法者,然佛實以大乘教化」 tr. “Yet in the past before the bodhisattvas, he disparaged śrāvakas who delighted in lesser Dharmas, though in truth the Buddha taught and transformed them through the Great Vehicle”〔T0262 0017c06〕『毀訾』 and 『毀呰』 are variant graphs for “disparaged”; the root treatise omits 『樂小法者』 tr. “who delighted in lesser Dharmas” and adds 『見』.
69「汝等所行是菩薩道。」 tr. “What you practice is the bodhisattva-path”〔T1716 0792c10〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「汝等所行,是菩薩道,漸漸修學,悉當成佛。」 tr. “What you practice is the bodhisattva-path; gradually cultivating and training, you shall all attain buddhahood”〔T0262 0020b23〕The first portion agrees; the received text has a comma and continuation.
70「開方便門,示真實相。」 tr. “Opening the gateway of skillful means, it reveals the true mark”〔T1716 0792c11〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「此經開方便門,示真實相。」 tr. “This sutra opens the gateway of skillful means and reveals the true mark”〔T0262 0031c16〕The root treatise omits 『此經』 tr. “this sutra.”
71「菩薩聞是法,疑網悉已除。」 tr. “When bodhisattvas hear this Dharma, the net of their doubts is entirely removed”〔T1716 0792c13〕The Lotus Sutra reads 「菩薩聞是法,疑網皆已除」 tr. “When bodhisattvas hear this Dharma, the net of their doubts is all removed”〔T0262 0010a20〕『悉』 tr. “entirely” differs from 『皆』 tr. “all.”

Named Works Not Placed in Quotation Marks by the Root Treatise

Root-text statementLocusPlacement in the received canonVerification result
“What the Abhidharma treatises uphold”0784b25The Abhidharma treatise corpusThe root treatise refers generally to the Tripiṭaka gateway of existence and is not forced into a single canonical number.
“This is perhaps what the Satyasiddhi Treatise upholds”0784c01The emptiness meaning of the three minds’ cessation in the Satyasiddhi Treatise T1646〔0251b22〕The meaning of emptiness is close; the stone-chamber story does not occur in the received text, and 『恐』 tr. “perhaps” modifies only the treatise said to uphold the gateway.
“Kātyāyana entered the path through this gateway and therefore composed the Kunle Treatise0784c05–c07The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom T1509 transmits the claim that the Kunle had 3,200,000 words and was composed by Mahākātyāyana〔0192b03〕No independently extant work of this exact title has been found; the referent remains under investigation, and T1509 is only the carrier of the passage.
“The Vātsīputrīya Abhidharma upholds this meaning”0784c11–c14The Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom T1509 cites the Vātsīputrīya Abhidharma on the five aggregates and the person as an inexpressible category〔0061a22〕No independently extant work has been found; the referent remains under investigation, and the carrier passage is not retitled as the Vātsīputrīya treatise itself.
Piṅgala’s annotated treatise0785a13–a15The three-kinds-of-true-mark sentence in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā T1564〔0025b23〕The received affiliation is secure; wording differences appear in item 12.
Subhadra Sūtra0786c10–c13The Dīrgha Āgama T0001 has the scene of Subhadra, the noble eightfold path, and the absence of the fruits of renunciants among non-Buddhists〔0025a29〕; the Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom T1509 separately has nearby wording concerning the lion’s roar and the absence of a path among non-Buddhists〔0081a05〕No independently extant text of the same title has been found; it is recorded as a scene-title and the referent remains under investigation.
“Five hundred arhats composed the Vibhāṣā0787a10The title of the Abhidharma Mahāvibhāṣā Treatise T1545 credits five hundred great arhats and others as compilers〔0001a05〕The number and compiler scene directly agree; the received title is fuller.
“The Sīyi has thirty-two kinds of great compassion”0787b14The Sūtra Requested by Brahmā Viśeṣacintin T0586 has the Tathāgata’s thirty-two kinds of great compassion protecting sentient beings〔0041c06–0042a23〕The scene directly agrees.
Zhiguan0790c17Mohe Zhiguan T1911A pointer to the fuller account, not a verbatim quotation.
The southern and northern paths of the Treatise on the Grounds and the rise of the Mahāyānasaṃgraha0792a13Description of scholastic lineages and translation traditionsThe root treatise does not name one particular Treatise on the Ten Grounds or one translation; no canonical number is assigned on its behalf.
Order of the final two chapters of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā0792b20–b24“Examination of the Twelve Links,” chapter twenty-six〔0036b17〕, and “Examination of Wrong Views,” chapter twenty-seven〔0036c24〕, in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā T1564The chapter order is secure. The judgment that the treatise first sweeps away through the Great Vehicle and then shows a Lesser Vehicle gateway is the root treatise’s structural reading, not a self-description projected back into the root work.

The seventy-one items include matching wording, excerpts, combined quotations, reversed order, terminological synopses, and the root treatise’s own designations; they cannot all be described as verbatim quotations. The Lotus evidence is dispersed across many chapters and must remain in the sequence in which the root treatise cites it rather than being rearranged as an imagined continuous scriptural passage. The Kunle Treatise, the Vātsīputrīya Abhidharma, and the Subhadra Sūtra all retain the status “referent under investigation.” The Satyasiddhi Treatise item retains the root treatise’s 『恐』 tr. “perhaps” and does not assign the stone-chamber story to the received Satyasiddhi Treatise.

Essential Explanations from the Shiqian [the Mirror]

The Fahua Xuanyi Shiqian (T1717) gathers this unit under the reason for its introduction and the proper unfolding and explanation of the section. It first judges, 「此中具明十六皆為實門,文中雖無開廢等文,意在第九卷,故此不論。」 tr. “Here all sixteen are fully explained as gateways into the real. Although this passage has no text on opening, retiring, and related matters, that intent lies in fascicle nine and therefore is not discussed here”〔T1717 0937a24〕. “Not discussed here” is limited to the text on opening and retiring; it does not mean that the sixteen gateways cannot enter the real. The general explanation of gateway characteristics first states, 「初文五:初釋門名,謂能通也。」 tr. “The opening passage has five parts. First it explains the name ‘gateway,’ meaning that which can give access”〔T1717 0937b02〕, and then distinguishes direct, revolving, and mutually supporting relationships between teaching and contemplation according to faculties.

The gateway of teaching and the gateway of practice cannot be collapsed into a single thing. The Mirror explicitly says, 「教行者,行秖是觀」 tr. “As for teaching and practice, practice is simply contemplation”〔T1717 0937b10〕. Teaching is the signifying discourse heard, while practice is the contemplation cultivated; according to faculties, each may serve as a supporting condition for the other. The point of entering and the contemplation for entering likewise have strict divisions of labor: 「處論所通,觀論能入。」 tr. “The point concerns what is accessed; contemplation concerns what enables entry”〔T1717 0938a14〕. The former distinguishes partial and perfect truth as destinations; the latter distinguishes the ten contemplations by which one enters.

That the Tripiṭaka, Shared, and Distinct Teachings each expand one gateway through ten contemplations and leave the other three to be understood by analogy does not mean that the abbreviated gateways lack contemplation. The commentary expressly determines, 「但此中文意在教相,故觀法存略。」 tr. “The intent of the present text lies in the characteristics of the teaching, and therefore the methods of contemplation are retained only in abbreviated form”〔T1717 0938a25〕. Because the root treatise emphasizes the characteristics of the teaching, it presents only the outline of contemplation. The Tripiṭaka gateway must still be threaded throughout by the ten items of object, arousing resolve, settling the mind, pervasive breaking, passage and obstruction, factors of the path, counteractives, stages, endurance, and freedom from attachment; the same structure applies to the Shared and Distinct gateways, with different meanings in each.

The Perfect gateway first displays its intent through contention and freedom from contention within and beyond the realms, then distinguishes it from the Distinct gateway through ten perspectives. The first seven are not single-layer contrasts, because 「然此十意,前之七意皆有三段」 tr. “Of these ten meanings, each of the first seven has three sections”〔T1717 0939b05〕: first the meaning itself is properly distinguished, then Distinct and Perfect are judged, and finally the passage is classified through its order in the scripture and the stage of practice. The mere presence of language about interpenetration is therefore not enough to judge a passage Perfect; its stage, the people and Dharmas broken or integrated, and the opening and conclusion must be read together.

The Perfect gateway’s ten contemplations take the Four Truths of the one reality as their object. The Mirror brings suffering and accumulation back to the present mind in the statement 「今一念心具十法界苦集」 tr. “The present single thought-moment contains the suffering and accumulation of the ten Dharma realms”〔T1717 0940c03〕. Although the Four Truths are mutually identical, suffering, accumulation, path, and cessation still remain distinguishable in aspect. The sequence of the ten contemplations continues to let practitioners examine each step; mutual identity does not abolish arousing resolve, concentration and wisdom, pervasive breaking, passage and obstruction, counteractives, or freedom from attachment.

The passages proving the ten contemplations in the present sutra are dispersed throughout it. The commentary expressly says, 「彼《止觀》局引大車,今散引一部」 tr. “That Zhiguan confines its citations to the great cart, while here passages are cited throughout the whole work”〔T1717 0941a24〕. The root treatise’s synoptic phrases may therefore be explained only in their existing sequence under the respective contemplations; they must not be rearranged into a passage falsely presented as continuous scripture. The hinge for the latter half’s judgment of coarse and wondrous is 「四門是教、十觀是行,皆通至極」 tr. “The four gateways are teaching, the ten contemplations are practice, and all give access to the ultimate”〔T1717 0942a21〕. Gateway-Dharmas, faculties, the four siddhāntas, and the success or failure of the ten contemplations must be considered together; the gateway name alone does not fix it as coarse or wondrous.

When opening the coarse, the commentary distinctly states, 「次正開中三:謂凡夫二乘菩薩也。」 tr. “Next, the proper opening has three: ordinary beings, the two vehicles, and bodhisattvas”〔T1717 0943b07〕. Within the two vehicles it further distinguishes the Dharma signified, the teaching that signifies, the practice performed, and the principle realized. The final “opening” thus has concrete recipients; it does not merely rename an abstract skillful means as reality.

Explanations of Various Masters

Zhiquan’s Fahua Jing Xuanqian Zhengshi (X0592) is the most direct later running corroboration found in this review. Beginning with 「○四、入實門,明行門功能。」 tr. “Fourth, the gateway into the real, clarifying the function of the gateway of practice”〔X0592 0622a15〕, it comments continuously through the final opening of the coarse. It explains the syntax of 『恐』 tr. “perhaps” with 「空生所見,恐是成實論所申。論是佛滅後造,故云恐。」 tr. “What Subhūti saw in emptiness is perhaps what the Satyasiddhi Treatise upholds. The treatise was composed after the Buddha’s extinction, and therefore the text says ‘perhaps’”〔X0592 0622b01〕. This confirms that the reservation applies only to the treatise said to uphold the gateway. It also explains the point of entering as the place reached and winding indirection as the route of wisdom that analyzes dharmas to clarify emptiness. At the passage on the two fruits, Zhiquan explicitly records that he has not seen translations of their names, and so only the transcriptions Zhentoujia and Jialuojia and their functions as sweet and poisonous are retained, without reconstructing them.

Zhixu’s Essential Selections from the Fahua Xuanyi (X0589) directly transmits this unit. It begins, 「四、明入實相門者。夫實相幽微,其理淵奧,如登絕壑,必假飛梯。」 tr. “Fourth, clarifying the gateways into the true mark. The true mark is subtle and hidden, and its principle profound and deep. It is like climbing an impassable ravine, for which one must rely on a flying ladder”〔X0589 0538a18〕. It preserves the four intents, the four-proposition gateway meanings, the mutual support of teaching and practice, and the structure of the sixteen gateways, but later states, 「三、示麤妙;四、示開顯。俱不暇錄,可以意得。」 tr. “Third, showing coarse and wondrous; fourth, showing opening and revelation. There is no leisure to record either; their meaning may be understood”〔X0589 0538c07〕. This is an editor’s explicit abridgment and cannot be reversed into a claim that the root treatise lacks the latter two divisions.

Congyi’s Supplementary Notes to the Three Great Works of the Lotus (X0586) elsewhere says, 「般若有種種方法,謂四門入清涼池」 tr. “Prajñā has various methods, namely the four gateways entering the cooling pool”〔X0586 0165c23〕. It directly matches the four gateways as what gives access and equal great wisdom as what is realized, but it is not a line-by-line commentary on this unit.

Zhiyuan’s Guide to the Three Virtues in the Commentary on the Nirvāṇa Sūtra (X0662) also serves only as cross-textual evidence. It says, 「圓教四門即是不生不生句中具四句也。」 tr. “The four gateways of the Perfect Teaching are precisely the four propositions contained within the proposition ‘unborn and unborn’”〔X0662 0548a07〕. This may be read together with the root treatise’s one gateway being the other three and the continued establishment of four propositions according to faculties. Its discussions of the one seal of the true mark, the mutual convergence of four gateways, and the four siddhāntas must remain within that commentary’s own exegetical context and are not presented as running notes on this unit.

Terminology

Gateway. That which gives access. Teaching can arouse true understanding, and contemplative practice can realize the principle accessed; both teaching and practice may therefore serve as gateways, mutually supporting without being conflated.

Sixteen gateways and thirty-two gateways. Each of the four teachings uses the four propositions of existence, emptiness, both existence and emptiness, and neither existence nor nonexistence to express principle, producing sixteen gateways of teaching. When teaching and contemplation are considered together, the large count is thirty-two. Examining faculties, spiritual advisers, teachings, and contemplative practices in detail, the gateways are actually immeasurable.

Point of entering and contemplation for entering. The point of entering refers to the principle accessed through the gateways: the first eight gateways all access partial truth, and the latter eight all access perfect truth. The contemplation for entering refers to the practice that enables entry: the ten items of object, arousing true resolve, settling the mind in concentration and wisdom, pervasively breaking through dharmas, discerning passage and obstruction, cultivating the factors of the path, applying counteractives, knowing stages, enduring, and not producing Dharma attachment.

Clumsy crossing and skillful crossing. The Tripiṭaka gateways analyze dharmas to enter emptiness, following a winding and narrow route. The Shared gateways embody dharmas as immediately empty and are broad, direct, and skillful. Skillful and clumsy judge the gateway that gives access; they do not split the partial truth accessed into two truths.

Interpenetration and immediacy to dharmas. A Perfect gateway teaches that one gateway does not obstruct the other three, that all dharmas converge upon existence, and that existence is precisely the Dharma realm. The Distinct gateways remain sequentially distinct, with true, good, and wondrous existence established separately outside birth-and-death. Even the presence of the graph 『融』 tr. “interpenetration” must still be read together with the order of the scripture and the stage of practice.

Severing without severing. A Perfect gateway teaches severance within the nonduality of understanding and delusion, without constructing the image of the Distinct Teaching’s gradual cutting apart. The meaning still unfolds through pervasive breaking, passage and obstruction, counteractives, and freedom from attachment; it does not indulge affliction or discard cultivation.

Four Truths of the one reality. The suffering of birth-and-death and the accumulation of afflictions are each empty, provisional, and middle; suffering is precisely unconstructed cessation, and accumulation is precisely unconstructed path. The Four Truths mutually interpenetrate while remaining distinguishable in aspect. “One reality” does not reduce the Four Truths to one item.

Ten contemplations. Recognizing the object, genuinely arousing resolve, settling the mind through concentration and wisdom, pervasively breaking through all dharmas, discerning passage and obstruction, cultivating the factors of the path, applying counteractives, knowing stages, enduring, and not producing Dharma attachment. The meanings differ from gateway to gateway, while the tenfold function of examining the whole course remains continuous.

Coarse and wondrous. First distinguish the gateway that gives access from the principle accessed; then judge through the gateway-Dharma’s skillfulness or clumsiness, correspondence with faculties, the gain or loss of the four siddhāntas, and the success or failure of the ten contemplations. The same gateway obstructs when grasped and gives access when properly used; its name alone does not fix its rank.

Opening the coarse to reveal the wondrous. Opening craving and views, birth-and-death, ordinary beings, and discourse, together with the two vehicles’ Dharma, teaching, practice, and principle and bodhisattvas not yet perfect, so that what is not yet wondrous enters the wondrous. What is already wondrous has nothing further to be opened.

Zhentoujia and Jialuojia. The root treatise preserves transcriptions for two fruits, using the sweet fruit and poisonous fruit to judge correct and mistaken forms of the ten contemplations of a Distinct gateway. No secure translated names have been found, and no Sanskrit is reconstructed from their sound.

Similes · Cross-Reading · Carrying Forward

The flying ladder represents teaching and practice as supporting conditions for climbing to the true mark. Four gateways entering the cooling pool show that people of different faculties can all enter through a gateway. The four sides of a great fire cannot be grasped: when the gateway is not grasped it can warm the body, cook food, remove delusion, and accomplish the great matter; when grasped, wrong views instead burn the Dharma-body. Not touching the fire does not mean abandoning the gateway, but not attaching to its characteristics.

Oblique and direct gateways both access the provincial city, illustrating how the Tripiṭaka and Shared Teachings enter the same partial truth through clumsy and skillful means. Oblique and direct gateways both access the imperial city, illustrating how the Distinct and Perfect Teachings enter the same perfect truth through partiality and interpenetration. The public gateway of a kingdom also admits people going to the market while primarily serving officials going to court; likewise, a Great Vehicle gateway may secondarily admit the three vehicles into partial truth without thereby being renamed a Lesser Vehicle gateway.

The images used for the ten Tripiṭaka contemplations each have a fixed direction: right causes and conditions differ from wrong causes and no cause; concentration and wisdom resemble the paired wisdom and virtue of a worthy person; the five meditations for settling the mind resemble churning milk; impermanence breaking views resembles the new physician’s medicine; passage and obstruction resemble recognizing a written graph rather than a worm merely eating wood; the factors of the path lead toward three gateways of the city of nirvāṇa; auxiliary practices support right wisdom; knowledge of stages prevents fraudulent claims; endurance keeps warmth, summit, and receptivity continuous; and only freedom from attachment allows the four wholesome roots to enter seeing the truths. These similes each serve the contemplation where they occur and should not be interchanged.

The Distinct gateway arouses compassion through the treasure of gold covered by weeds, the jewel in the strongman’s forehead lost amid fighting, and the poor orphan exposed outside. A great tree that does not host a hostile bird illustrates not grasping the two vehicles’ immersion in emptiness, while the poisonous plants and king of medicines on the Snow Mountains show obstruction and passage present together. The thirty-seven factors are a jeweled torch; freedom from the ten characteristics opens the three liberations; inwardly one endures wholesome and unwholesome impulses, outwardly the eight winds; and finally one breaks the weeds of ignorance to reveal the treasure of gold.

The ten distinctions between the Perfect and Distinct use the identically named raw jades of Zhou and Zheng to distinguish wondrous existence from the real existence posited by non-Buddhists and warn against mixing gold and stone and thereby confusing wrong and right. Perfect breaking and integration encompass ordinary beings, the two vehicles, and bodhisattvas, together with people and Dharmas. “One gateway is immeasurable gateways” does not abolish the establishment of four gateways; it says that one does not obstruct the others, while four are still taught for four kinds of faculties.

The Perfect gateway’s ten contemplations first use someone watching fish beside a pool without making a net and someone packing provisions and binding his legs but sitting still, respectively warning that understanding the wondrous object and arousing vows must be followed by actual cultivation. Concentration and wisdom resemble balanced yin and yang, level wheels, and a complete pair of wings; pervasive breaking resembles a vajra axe and an unobscured sun; passage and obstruction resemble a commander’s treasure that chooses appropriately; the factors of the path culminate in three levels of withered, flourishing, and neither withered nor flourishing, without inventing a table that assigns four trees; Dharma attachment leaves one unable either to advance or retreat at the summit and must be extinguished before ignorance can be broken.

Reading and lecturing without knowing the skillful means of the ten contemplations is like knowing only how to milk but not how to churn and agitate milk into curds and ghee. Giving half or all of the wish-fulfilling jewel then asks whether recipients will value the path over bodily life and cultivate diligently. This group of similes turns from conceptual understanding toward practice and realization; it cannot be flattened into a generic statement about “knowing theory” that drops the specific actions of milking and preparing dairy products.

In judging coarse and wondrous, the sweet Zhentoujia fruit and poisonous Jialuojia fruit correspond item by item to correct and mistaken forms of the ten contemplations of a Distinct gateway. The root treatise itself gives nine parts poisonous fruit and one part sweet fruit, while the received Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra gives one part sweet fruit and ten parts poisonous fruit; each witness retains its own count. A thousand pounds of layered blossoms do not equal one ounce of real gold, showing that a small portion of real accomplishment surpasses a large portion of mistaken failure. Four fingers pointing to one moon show that the four gateways differ according to faculties while the principle indicated is one.

The Lotus Sutra subdues and breaks provisional gateways and principles like the Golden-Sand River with no further bends, while the Nirvāṇa Sūtra embraces all gateways like a hundred rivers returning to the sea. The first emphasizes a course with no turning back, the second diverse currents returning to one sea. The establishments of retaining and retiring gateways differ, but their return to the real does not; the two images cannot be compressed into a single picture.

The whole unit moves from gateway characteristics to contemplative practice, from contemplative practice to coarse and wondrous, and from coarse and wondrous to opening and revelation. A gateway is what gives access; principle is what is accessed. The four gateways of the four teachings are not ranked merely by their names, but must be judged by whether they match faculties and whether they accomplish the ten contemplations. Finally, what is opened is not a gateway-name alone, but the whole relation among ordinary beings, the two vehicles, bodhisattvas, and Dharma, teaching, practice, and principle.

Placement of the Editions

First, this unit uses T1716 as its base text, beginning at 0784a07 and ending at 0792c16. The three lines for fascicle eight, lower half, fascicle nine, upper half, and the attribution occur between the Distinct and Perfect gateways and belong to the transmitted frame.

Second, the complete critical apparatus for this unit has only one anchor, at 0790a10. The base-text context reads 「若生死即涅槃者,分段、變易,苦諦皆破」 tr. “If birth-and-death is precisely nirvāṇa, the truths of suffering consisting in segmented and transformational birth-and-death are all broken”〔T1716 0790a10〕. The critical edition’s main text adopts 『苦』 tr. “suffering,” while the Taishō source graph is 『若』. The collateral witness in the Zongjing lu reads 「若生死即涅槃者。分段變易。苦諦皆破。」 tr. “If birth-and-death is precisely nirvāṇa, segmented and transformational birth-and-death: the truth of suffering is entirely broken”〔T2016 0546c18〕. Both forms are recorded side by side without adjudication; the body continues to follow 『苦』 tr. “suffering” in the present base text.

Third, every quotation anchor is taken from the nearest line number in the same edition preceding the first graph of the quoted text. Where several short quotations occur on the same line, each is anchored according to its own first graph rather than inheriting the line number of the introductory phrase or the preceding quotation.

Fourth, the opening outline’s 『入體之門』 tr. “the gateway into the substance” and the body’s 『入實相門』 tr. “gateways into the true mark” are both actual transmitted forms in T1716. The former belongs to the general outline, the latter to the face of this unit; each is retained in place and neither is emended into the other.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing — with AI-assisted consistency checking

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0