解脫道論 食不耐想總說與經營
食不耐想的第一行叫「經營」,而經營與入身不淨兩面並看:世人為飲食行殺、盜、乞索、欺誑、詐現精進,隨即說飲食為因而有不清淨屎尿流溢;出家人為食離開清淨山林、歷寒熱泥雨而乞食,隨即也說飲食不淨、屎尿流出。取得負擔與身內不淨都是厭患所緣。
總說先列百味經營、清淨人所貴重、色香具足、所堪大貴,隨後明說飲食入身變成不淨、成不耐、成臭腐、成可憎惡。經營段列完眾生所行與所受後,原文明說「見食如是,令起厭患」;列完出家人住處與乞食所經後,又明說「彼見如是心起厭患」。心要只並置本段兩面及兩處明文,不另推導厭患的心理成因。
若將本段明載內容作編輯性摘要,可以分為三方面:飲食如何取得、出家人為取得飲食經歷何種艱難、飲食入身後成為何物。這三方面只整理經文已有材料;本段正式列出的修法是「以經營修行食不耐想」,功德則以前文八項為準。
The first mode of the perception of repulsiveness in food is procurement, and procurement is viewed together with impurity after food enters the body. Worldly people kill, steal, beg, deceive, and falsely display energy for food; the source immediately says that food is a cause for impure excrement and urine to overflow. Renunciants leave pure mountain forests, undergo cold, heat, mud, and rain, and gather alms; the source immediately says again that food is impure and excrement and urine flow out. The burden of obtaining food and its impurity in the body are both objects of repugnance.
The general account first lists many flavors obtained through procurement, esteem by pure people, fullness of color and fragrance, and high value. It then expressly says that food entering the body changes into impurity and becomes repulsive, putrid, and loathsome. After listing what beings do and undergo in procurement, the text states “seeing food thus, he arouses repugnance”; after listing renunciants’ dwellings and journeys for alms, it states “seeing this, he arouses repugnance.” This doorway places the two aspects and the two explicit statements side by side without adding a psychological cause.
As an editorial summary, the received material can be grouped under three aspects: how food is obtained, what hardship renunciants encounter in obtaining it, and what food becomes after entering the body. These headings only arrange what the source already contains. The formal practice named here is “cultivating the food-repulsiveness perception through procurement,” and the virtues remain the eight stated in the opening.
Shi Huijing · Waken · The Path of Freedom · The Perception of Repulsiveness in Food: Overview and Procurement · Doorway · Summer 2026
阿羅漢優波底沙造,梁扶南三藏僧伽婆羅譯《解脫道論》〈行門品〉「食不耐想總說與經營」· 大正藏 T32n1648〔起 T32 0440b〕。段首〔T32 …〕=大正藏頁·欄錨。
〔T32 0440b〕
問:云何於食不耐想?何修?何相?何味?何處?何起?何功德?云何為修?答:以所噉甞飲食,彼作意悉不耐,彼想知正知,此謂不耐食想。彼想住不亂,此謂修。於食取過患為相,厭為味,伏氣味愛為起。何功德者,成得八功德。若修不耐食想,知揣食想、知五欲具足、知色陰、知不淨想、在身念成修滿、從氣味愛縮、離彼心、向善趣向醍醐。云何修彼者,初坐禪人入寂寂坐,攝一切心,不亂心,以所噉甞飲食作不耐意。如是種種百味經營,清淨人所貴重、色香具足所堪大貴,如此飲食入身變成不淨,成不耐、成臭腐、成可憎惡。以五行修行不耐食想,所謂以經營、以散用、以處、以流、以聚。
問:云何以經營修行不耐食想?此坐禪人,見諸眾生為經營飲食因,行種種惡法,或殺害、或偷盜。亦見彼眾生受種種苦,知彼所殺害、所縛。亦見眾生造種種惡事,或乞索、或欺誑、詐現精進。見食如是,令起厭患,以不清淨屎尿流溢,飲食為因,彼作惡業如是。復見出家人,住清淨山林,種種花香禽獸吟嘯,善人所造,或於田野莊嚴具足,樹影林水取他人意,平舒淨妙無諸高下,人見驚訝無諸喧雜。是出家人修菩提處,等梵天居,如是住處心無貪著,常行禪誦樂修善事。或於寒熱風塵泥雨諸山嶮處,為經營食,因於捉鉢入家乞食。彼見如是心起厭患,飲食不淨屎尿流出。此經營食,是彼因故。如是當捨,求第一樂。復次見出家人修行,為乞食,或於馬象惡獸中、或狗野猪處、或惡人所、或不淨處踐踏泥屎。於他家門少時默住,以衣護身,為得揣食生疑。或見彼食猶如狗食,於食起厭。此經營食,最可憎惡,何用經營?但從他乞。如是以經營修行食不耐想。
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
問目與定義
問:什麼是於食不耐想?如何修?以什麼為相?以什麼為味?以什麼為處?以什麼為起?有什麼功德?如何為修?
答:對自己所「噉甞」的飲食,都作不耐的觀察。論文接著原作「彼想知正知」;這一句的確切句法,本段沒有再說明。這就叫作不耐食想。使這一想安住而不散亂,就叫作修。此法以從飲食看見過患為相,以厭為味,以伏除氣味愛為起。
八功德
它能成就八項功德:一、知揣食想;二、知五欲具足;三、知色陰;四、知不淨想;五、在身念成修滿;六、從氣味愛縮;七、離彼心;八、向善趣、向醍醐。
修法之總與五行
要修此法,坐禪人起初安靜坐下,收攝全心,使心不亂,對自己所「噉甞」的飲食作不耐想。
各種美味經營而得,為清淨人所看重,又具足色香,堪稱珍貴;然而這樣的飲食進入身體後,便變成不淨,成為不耐、臭腐、可憎惡之物。
以五行修行不耐食想,所謂以經營、以散用、以處、以流、以聚。
以經營修行不耐食想
問:怎樣以經營修行不耐食想?
坐禪人看見眾生為了經營飲食而行種種惡法,或殺害、或偷盜;也看見眾生受種種苦,其中有人被殺害、被繫縛;又看見眾生或乞求、或欺騙,或假裝精進。看見飲食牽涉這些事,便生厭患:以飲食為因,不清淨的屎尿流溢,眾生又如此造作惡業。
又看見出家人住在清淨山林:百花芬芳,禽獸鳴嘯;或由善人營造,或在田野中莊嚴具足;樹影林水令人歡喜,地勢平坦淨妙,沒有高下,見者驚歎,四周沒有喧雜。這是出家人修菩提之處,等同梵天之居;住在這裡,心不貪著,常行禪誦,樂修善事。然而為了經營飲食,仍要在寒熱、風塵、泥雨與險山之中,拿鉢入村乞食。坐禪人看見這些便生厭患:飲食終成不淨,屎尿從中流出;這些奔走都是經營飲食所致。因此應捨離這種經營,追求第一樂。
又看見出家人為了乞食,或穿行在馬象等惡獸之中,或經過狗與野豬出沒處,或到惡人所在之處,或在不淨處踐踏泥屎;到了別人家門前,默默站一會兒,以衣護身,對能否得到「揣食」仍心存疑慮。有時又看見所得食物如同狗食,於是對食生厭。這種經營飲食最可憎惡,何必經營?只是向別人乞取而已。
這樣以經營修行食不耐想。
Questions and Definition
Question: What is the perception of repulsiveness in food? What is its cultivation, characteristic, function, place, arousing, and virtue? How is it cultivated?
Answer: With respect to the food one eats and tastes, one attends to all of it as repulsive. The source then reads 彼想知正知; its exact syntax is not explained in this passage. This is called the perception of repulsiveness in food. For this perception to remain without distraction is called cultivation. Taking the faults of food is its characteristic, repugnance its function, and subduing craving for flavor its arousing.
Eight Virtues
It accomplishes eight virtues: first, knowing the perception of morsel food; second, knowing fulfillment of the five desires; third, knowing the material aggregate; fourth, knowing the perception of impurity; fifth, fulfilling cultivation of mindfulness of the body; sixth, drawing back from craving for flavor; seventh, departing from that mind; and eighth, tending toward a good destination and toward the cream.
General Method and Five Modes
To cultivate it, the beginning meditator enters a deeply quiet sitting place, gathers the whole mind, makes it undistracted, and attends to the food one eats and tastes as repulsive.
Many flavors are obtained through procurement, esteemed by pure people, complete in color and fragrance, and accounted highly valuable. Yet when such food enters the body, it changes into impurity: it becomes repulsive, putrid, and loathsome.
The perception of repulsiveness in food is cultivated in five modes: through procurement, dispersed use, place, flow, and aggregation.
Cultivating the Perception of Repulsiveness in Food through Procurement
Question: How is the perception of repulsiveness in food cultivated through procurement?
The meditator sees beings committing various evil actions for the sake of procuring food: killing and stealing. He also sees them undergoing various sufferings, including being killed and bound. He sees beings perform further evil deeds: begging, deceiving, and falsely displaying energy. Seeing food involved in these things, he arouses repugnance. Food is a cause for impure excrement and urine to overflow, and beings commit evil actions in this way.
He also sees renunciants dwelling in pure mountain forests fragrant with many flowers and resonant with birds and beasts. Some places are made by good people; some are in the countryside and fully adorned. Tree shade, woods, and water delight others; the ground is level, pure, and fine, without unevenness; people marvel at it, and it is free of clamor. This is a place where renunciants cultivate awakening, equal to a Brahmā dwelling. Dwelling there without greed or attachment, they continually practice meditation and recitation and delight in cultivating wholesome matters. Yet to procure food they must take their bowls and enter homes for alms through cold, heat, wind, dust, mud, rain, and difficult mountains. Seeing this, the meditator arouses repugnance: food becomes impure, and excrement and urine flow out from it. These journeys arise from procuring food. Therefore such procurement is to be relinquished and the foremost pleasure sought.
He further sees renunciants who, in order to gather alms, move among horses, elephants, and fierce beasts, through places with dogs and wild boars, into the presence of evil people, or through unclean places where they tread in mud and excrement. At another’s door they stand silently for a short time, covering the body with their robe, uncertain whether they will receive morsel food. At times they see that food resembles dog food and become repelled by it. This procurement of food is most loathsome. What use is procurement? It is only begging from others.
In this way one cultivates the food-repulsiveness perception through procurement.
Shi Huijing · Waken · The Path of Freedom · The Perception of Repulsiveness in Food: Overview and Procurement · Vernacular · Summer 2026
三十八行處的又一門開卷。先把所見說在前頭:食不耐想先總說所噉甞的飲食入身後變成不淨、臭腐、可憎惡,再列五行;第一行「經營」同時寫取得飲食的負擔與飲食所成的不淨。「問:云何以經營修行不耐食想?此坐禪人,見諸眾生為經營飲食因,行種種惡法,或殺害、或偷盜」〔T32 440b27–29〕,其後又說「以不清淨屎尿流溢,飲食為因」〔T32 440c03〕。出家人一段也先寫為食離開清淨山林、歷寒熱泥雨與乞食之難,再明說「飲食不淨屎尿流出」〔T32 440c10–11〕。本段在「經營」一行明列殺害、偷盜、乞索、欺誑、詐現精進、離開靜處與乞食所經之難,也明列飲食所成的屎尿不淨;兩段各自明說由所見而起厭患。
總說:八問一缺、八德相符
「問:云何於食不耐想?何修?何相?何味?何處?何起?何功德?云何為修?」〔T32 440b14–15〕——問實測八目。「答:以所噉甞飲食,彼作意悉不耐,彼想知正知,此謂不耐食想」〔T32 440b15–16〕以下,先說「彼想住不亂,此謂修」,再說「於食取過患為相,厭為味,伏氣味愛為起」〔T32 440b17–18〕;其中修的答語是想住不亂,相是於食取過患,味是厭,起是伏氣味愛,四問都有明文作答。「何處」一問則無答(四本無「何處」二字,從之則問七;本文依大正保留此問,而不另補回答)。「伏氣味愛為起」照原字保留,本段沒有另為「氣味愛」下定義。功德八目:「若修不耐食想,知揣食想、知五欲具足、知色陰、知不淨想、在身念成修滿、從氣味愛縮、離彼心、向善趣向醍醐」〔T32 440b18–21〕——實測八目與標數恰合:前四項逐字以「知」領起,後四項依次作在身念成修滿、從氣味愛縮、離彼心、向善趣向醍醐。此門的門名自身也是一件可觀之物:本門「不耐食想」十三見、「食不耐想」三見,二稱交錯並用而非一處之筆誤;兩種次序都依原文保留,不強行畫一。
因此八項的句式分成前四與後四兩組:前四同以「知」領起,後四各循原句的動詞而下。第五項說在身念成修滿,第六項說從氣味愛縮,第七項說離彼心,第八項說向善趣、向醍醐;後四項的字面都沒有再冠一個「知」字。
八功德列完後,答文再問「云何修彼者」,隨即寫:「初坐禪人入寂寂坐,攝一切心,不亂心,以所噉甞飲食作不耐意」〔T32 440b21–23〕。按字面次序,先出入寂寂坐,再出攝一切心與不亂心,最後才以所噉甞飲食作不耐意。「寂寂」與「噉甞」都照原字保留;本單元沒有另為兩詞下定義。這句之後才進入百味經營、人所貴重、色香具足與入身不淨的列說。
百味、貴重與入身不淨
修法總說依次寫:「如是種種百味經營,清淨人所貴重、色香具足所堪大貴,如此飲食入身變成不淨,成不耐、成臭腐、成可憎惡」〔T32 440b23–25〕。可按原句核出兩組明文:入身以前列百味經營、清淨人所貴重、色香具足、所堪大貴;入身以後列變成不淨、成不耐、成臭腐、成可憎惡。原文只按此次序並列,不另說每一項怎樣引生下一項。接著標出五行:「以五行修行不耐食想,所謂以經營、以散用、以處、以流、以聚」〔T32 440b25–27〕。五個名稱依次是經營、散用、處、流、聚;本單元接著只問「云何以經營修行不耐食想」,所以此處只依本段解說第一項,不預先替後四項下定義。
這句在五行總標之前已明列入身後的四個結果:變成不淨、成不耐、成臭腐、成可憎惡;所以不淨並非後四行才出現,而是五行展開前已立的總觀。
經營:眾生所行與所受
經營段先說,坐禪人看見眾生因經營飲食而行種種惡法,明列「或殺害、或偷盜」〔T32 440b29〕。其後又說眾生受種種苦,並知彼所殺害、所縛〔T32 440b29–440c01〕;再列「或乞索、或欺誑、詐現精進」〔T32 440c01–02〕。這五種行為依原次序是殺害、偷盜、乞索、欺誑、詐現精進;原文把它們列在同段,沒有比較彼此的輕重,也沒有為「詐現精進」另補動機。列完後才說:「見食如是,令起厭患,以不清淨屎尿流溢,飲食為因,彼作惡業如是」〔T32 440c02–04〕。因此可確定的是行為、所受之苦、不清淨屎尿、飲食為因、惡業與「令起厭患」都在答文中;它們之外的心理機制,本段沒有另說。
本段有兩處把「經營」與屎尿不淨直接相接。世人段先列殺害、偷盜、受害受縛、乞索、欺誑、詐現精進,隨即說:「見食如是,令起厭患,以不清淨屎尿流溢,飲食為因,彼作惡業如是」〔T32 440c02–04〕。出家人段先列清淨山林、寒熱風塵泥雨與捉鉢乞食,隨即說:「彼見如是心起厭患,飲食不淨屎尿流出。此經營食,是彼因故」〔T32 440c10–11〕。前者用「流溢」,後者用「流出」;兩處都把飲食、屎尿、不淨與厭患放在同一段理由中。
經營:出家人所經之處
「復見出家人,住清淨山林,種種花香禽獸吟嘯,善人所造」〔T32 440c04–05〕;下文續列田野莊嚴、樹影林水、平舒淨妙、無諸高下、無諸喧雜,並稱這是「修菩提處,等梵天居」,住者心無貪著,常行禪誦、樂修善事〔T32 440c05–08〕。答文其後另列寒熱、風塵、泥雨、山嶮,以及為經營食而捉鉢入家乞食〔T32 440c08–10〕。接著原文明說:「彼見如是心起厭患,飲食不淨屎尿流出。此經營食,是彼因故。如是當捨,求第一樂」〔T32 440c10–12〕。這一段可確定的次序是先列住處,再列乞食所經,然後列心起厭患、飲食不淨、屎尿流出、當捨與求第一樂;不另補哪一項必然造成下一項的心理說明。
「復次見出家人修行,為乞食,或於馬象惡獸中、或狗野猪處、或惡人所、或不淨處踐踏泥屎」〔T32 440c12–14〕。這裡按原次序列出四類去處:馬象等惡獸之中、狗與野豬出沒之處、惡人所在之處,以及必須踐踏泥屎的不淨處。前一段從清淨山林寫到寒熱風塵泥雨與險山,這一段再把乞食路上的獸、人與污穢逐項列明;兩段共同交代取得飲食時所經歷的艱難。
到了別人家門前,原文接著說「少時默住,以衣護身,為得揣食生疑」〔T32 440c14–15〕:只站一會兒,默然而住,以衣護身,並對能否得到揣食生疑。正文只陳述這些動作與疑慮,沒有另說僧衣的功用或乞者的身分感受。其後「或見彼食猶如狗食,於食起厭」〔T32 440c15–16〕,由所得飲食如狗食而生厭;再以「此經營食,最可憎惡,何用經營?但從他乞」〔T32 440c16–17〕收束,最後結作「如是以經營修行食不耐想」〔T32 440c17〕。這一小段的次序清楚:先列乞食所經諸處,再寫門前默住與得食之疑,繼而以狗食為喻而起厭,終於經營一行的結語。
若為整理本段,可把原文明載的材料概括為三方面:飲食的取得牽涉哪些行為,出家人為取得飲食經歷哪些環境與行程,以及飲食入身後成為何物。這三方面只是對本段內容的編輯性摘要;正文正式列出的修法仍是「以經營修行食不耐想」,功德仍以前述八項為準。
帶走三件:一個所見(經營與入身不淨兩面並看——取得飲食伴隨惡業、離靜處與乞食艱難,飲食本身又入身變成不淨、臭腐、屎尿流出),一個讀法(五行依原列是經營、散用、處、流、聚;本段先釋經營,卻已兩次明說屎尿不淨),一條線(總說先由百味、人所貴重、色香具足轉到入身不淨;經營段再把世人與出家人的取得負擔和身內不淨逐段合寫)。餘四行在下一段接續。
Another doorway among the thirty-eight fields of practice opens here. Begin with the central observation: the general account of the food-repulsiveness perception first says that the food one eats and tastes becomes impure, putrid, and loathsome after entering the body, and then lists five modes; the first mode, “procurement,” presents both the burden of obtaining food and the impurity into which food changes. “Question: How is the perception of repulsiveness in food cultivated through procurement? The meditator sees beings committing various evil actions for the sake of procuring food, such as killing and stealing” 〔T32 440b27–29〕. It later says, “Impure excrement and urine overflow, with food as their cause” 〔T32 440c03〕. The passage on renunciants likewise first describes leaving a pure mountain forest for food, undergoing cold, heat, mud, and rain and the difficulties of alms-gathering, and then expressly states, “Food is impure, and excrement and urine flow out” 〔T32 440c10–11〕. Under “procurement,” this passage expressly lists killing, stealing, begging, deception, falsely displaying energy, leaving a quiet place, and the difficulties encountered in gathering alms; it also expressly lists the impurity of the excrement and urine produced by food. Each of the two passages says that what is seen gives rise to repugnance.
General Account: Eight Questions, One Unanswered; Eight Virtues Match Their Count
“Question: What is the perception of repulsiveness in food? What is its cultivation? What is its characteristic? What is its function? What is its place? What is its arousing? What is its virtue? How is it cultivated?” 〔T32 440b14–15〕—eight items by actual count. The answer beginning, “With respect to the food one eats and tastes, one attends to all of it as repulsive; 彼想知正知; this is called the perception of repulsiveness in food” 〔T32 440b15–16〕, first says, “For that perception to remain without distraction is called cultivation,” then, “Taking the faults of food is its characteristic, repugnance its function, and subduing craving for flavor its arousing” 〔T32 440b17–18〕. Thus cultivation is answered by the perception remaining undistracted, the characteristic is taking the faults of food, the function is repugnance, and the arousing is subduing craving for flavor; all four questions have explicit answers. The question about “place” has none (the four witnesses omit the two graphs 何處, “what place,” yielding seven questions; this edition follows the Taishō in retaining the question and does not supply an answer). “Subduing craving for flavor is its arousing” is retained as written; this passage gives no separate definition of “craving for flavor.” The eight virtues are: “If one cultivates the perception of repulsiveness in food, one knows the perception of morsel food, knows fulfillment of the five desires, knows the material aggregate, knows the perception of impurity, fulfills cultivation of mindfulness of the body, draws back from craving for flavor, departs from that mind, and tends toward a good destination and toward the cream” 〔T32 440b18–21〕. The eight items exactly match the stated number: the first four are each introduced by “knows,” while the latter four read, in order, fulfilling cultivation of mindfulness of the body, drawing back from craving for flavor, departing from that mind, and tending toward a good destination and toward the cream. The name of this doorway is itself worth observing: “perception of repulsiveness in food” occurs thirteen times and “food-repulsiveness perception” three times. The two orders are interwoven rather than being an error at a single point; both are retained without forcing them into one form.
Accordingly, the syntax of the eight divides into a first group of four and a latter group of four: the first four are each led by “knows,” while the latter four follow the verbs of their source phrases. The fifth says that cultivation of mindfulness of the body is fulfilled; the sixth, that one draws back from craving for flavor; the seventh, that one departs from that mind; and the eighth, that one tends toward a good destination and toward the cream. None of the latter four is prefaced in the source by another “knows.”
After listing the eight virtues, the answer again asks, “How is it cultivated?” and immediately says: “The beginning meditator enters a deeply quiet sitting place, gathers the whole mind, makes the mind undistracted, and attends to the food one eats and tastes as repulsive” 〔T32 440b21–23〕. In the literal order come first entering deeply quiet sitting, then gathering the whole mind and making it undistracted, and only at the end attending to the food one eats and tastes as repulsive. The source forms 寂寂 (“deeply quiet”) and 噉甞 (“eats and tastes”) are retained; this unit gives neither a further definition. Only after this sentence does the text proceed to many flavors obtained through procurement, what people esteem, fullness of color and fragrance, and impurity after entering the body.
Many Flavors, Esteem, and Impurity after Entering the Body
The general account of the practice proceeds in sequence: “Many flavors obtained through procurement, esteemed by pure people, complete in color and fragrance, and accounted highly valuable; such food enters the body and changes into impurity, becoming repulsive, putrid, and loathsome” 〔T32 440b23–25〕. Two explicit groups can be checked in the source sentence: before entry into the body come many flavors obtained through procurement, esteem by pure people, fullness of color and fragrance, and high value; after entry come becoming impure, repulsive, putrid, and loathsome. The source only places them in this order and does not separately explain how each gives rise to the next. It then states the five modes: “The perception of repulsiveness in food is cultivated in five modes: through procurement, dispersed use, place, flow, and aggregation” 〔T32 440b25–27〕. The five names, in order, are procurement, dispersed use, place, flow, and aggregation. This unit next asks only how it is cultivated through procurement, so it explains only the first and does not define the other four in advance.
Before the heading of the five modes, the sentence has already expressly named four results after food enters the body: becoming impure, repulsive, putrid, and loathsome. Impurity is therefore not something that appears only in the latter four modes; it is established in the general contemplation before the five modes unfold.
Procurement: What Beings Do and Undergo
The procurement section first says that the meditator sees beings commit various evil actions for the sake of procuring food, expressly listing “killing or stealing” 〔T32 440b29〕. It then says that beings undergo various sufferings and that he knows those killed and bound 〔T32 440b29–440c01〕; it next lists “begging or deceiving, falsely displaying energy” 〔T32 440c01–02〕. These five actions occur in the source order: killing, stealing, begging, deceiving, and falsely displaying energy. The source places them in one passage, without comparing their severity or supplying a separate motive for “falsely displaying energy.” Only after the list does it say, “Seeing food thus, he arouses repugnance; impure excrement and urine overflow, with food as their cause; beings perform evil actions in this way” 〔T32 440c02–04〕. The answer explicitly contains the actions, the suffering undergone, impure excrement and urine, food as their cause, evil action, and “arouses repugnance”; it gives no further psychological mechanism beyond them.
Twice this passage directly connects “procurement” with the impurity of excrement and urine. The passage on beings first lists killing, stealing, being killed and bound, begging, deception, and falsely displaying energy, and immediately says: “Seeing food thus, he arouses repugnance; impure excrement and urine overflow, with food as their cause; beings perform evil actions in this way” 〔T32 440c02–04〕. The passage on renunciants first lists a pure mountain forest, cold, heat, wind, dust, mud, rain, and alms-gathering, and immediately says: “Seeing this, he arouses repugnance; food is impure, and excrement and urine flow out. This is the procurement of food; it is the cause of that” 〔T32 440c10–11〕. The first uses “overflow,” the second “flow out”; both place food, excrement and urine, impurity, and repugnance within one statement.
Procurement: Places Traversed by Renunciants
“He further sees renunciants dwelling in pure mountain forests, with many flowers fragrant and birds and beasts calling, made by good people” 〔T32 440c04–05〕. The following lines continue with fully adorned fields, tree shade, woods and water that delight others, ground that is level, pure, and fine, without rises or hollows; people marvel at it, and it is free from clamor. They call this “a place where renunciants cultivate awakening, equal to a Brahmā dwelling,” and say that those dwelling there have no greed or attachment, continually practice meditation and recitation, and delight in wholesome matters 〔T32 440c05–08〕. The answer then separately lists cold, heat, wind, dust, mud, rain, difficult mountains, and taking the bowl and entering homes for alms in order to procure food 〔T32 440c08–10〕. It next expressly states: “Seeing this, he arouses repugnance; food is impure, and excrement and urine flow out. This is the procurement of food; it is the cause of that. Thus it should be relinquished and the foremost pleasure sought” 〔T32 440c10–12〕. The ascertainable order is dwelling place, conditions traversed for alms, the mind arousing repugnance, food’s impurity, excrement and urine flowing out, relinquishing, and seeking the foremost pleasure. No psychological explanation is added to make any one item necessarily produce the next.
“He further sees renunciants practicing for alms, among horses, elephants, and fierce beasts, in places with dogs and wild boars, in the presence of evil people, or in unclean places treading in mud and excrement” 〔T32 440c12–14〕. Four kinds of place occur in the source order: among horses, elephants, and fierce beasts; where dogs and wild boars are; where evil people are; and unclean ground where one must tread in mud and excrement. The preceding paragraph moved from the pure mountain forest into cold, heat, wind, dust, mud, rain, and difficult mountains; this paragraph further itemizes the beasts, people, and filth along the alms route. Together the two paragraphs state the difficulties undergone in obtaining food.
At the door of another household, the source continues, “For a short time they stand silently, covering the body with their robe, uncertain whether they will receive morsel food” 〔T32 440c14–15〕. They stand only briefly, remain silent, cover the body with the robe, and are uncertain whether food will be obtained. The text states only these actions and this doubt; it gives no separate account of the robe’s function or the beggar’s sense of identity. It then says, “At times they see that food is like dog food and become repelled by it” 〔T32 440c15–16〕. It closes with, “This procurement of food is most loathsome. What use is procurement? It is only begging from others” 〔T32 440c16–17〕, and finally concludes, “In this way the food-repulsiveness perception is cultivated through procurement” 〔T32 440c17〕. The sequence of this small passage is clear: first the places traversed for alms, then silent standing at the door and doubt about obtaining food, then the comparison with dog food and the arising of repugnance, and finally the close of the procurement mode.
To organize this passage, the material expressly present in the source may be summarized under three aspects: what actions the obtaining of food involves, what environments and journeys renunciants undergo to obtain it, and what food becomes after entering the body. These three aspects are only an editorial summary of the passage’s contents. The formal practice named in the text remains “cultivating the food-repulsiveness perception through procurement,” and its virtues remain the eight stated above.
Carry away three things: one observation (procurement and impurity after entry into the body are viewed together—obtaining food involves evil actions, leaving quiet places, and the hardships of alms-gathering, while food itself enters the body and becomes impure and putrid, with excrement and urine flowing out); one reading method (the five modes in their source order are procurement, dispersed use, place, flow, and aggregation; this passage first explains procurement, yet already twice expressly mentions the impurity of excrement and urine); and one through-line (the general account moves from many flavors, esteem, and fullness of color and fragrance to impurity after entry into the body; the procurement section then again writes together, paragraph by paragraph, the burdens borne by worldly people and renunciants in obtaining food and the impurity within the body). The other four modes continue in the next passage.
Shi Huijing · Waken · The Path of Freedom · The Perception of Repulsiveness in Food: Overview and Procurement · Exposition · Summer 2026
考據Apparatus
全段定位 本段出自《解脫道論》卷第八〈行門品〉之五,承觀四大之夾註「(觀四大已竟)」〔T32 440b13〕而下,為三十八行處之食不耐想門開卷,總說其相味起與八功德,標五行而先釋其第一(經營)。底本二段〔T32 440b14–440c17〕。
一、科判定位
二段,逐節起訖逐字可核:
| 節 | 經文起訖逐字(各繫其錨) |
|---|---|
| 八問並舉(甲段) | 「問:云何於食不耐想」〔T32 440b14〕…「何功德?云何為修?」〔T32 440b15〕 |
| 定義(甲段續) | 「以所噉甞飲食,彼作意悉不耐」〔T32 440b15–16〕…「此謂不耐食想」 |
| 修·相·味·起(甲段續) | 「彼想住不亂,此謂修」〔T32 440b16–17〕…「於食取過患為相,厭為味,伏氣味愛為起」〔T32 440b17–18〕 |
| 八功德(甲段續) | 「成得八功德。若修不耐食想」〔T32 440b18–19〕…「向善趣向醍醐」〔T32 440b21〕 |
| 修法之總(甲段續) | 「云何修彼者」〔T32 440b21〕…「以所噉甞飲食作不耐意」〔T32 440b22–23〕…「如是種種百味經營」〔T32 440b23〕…「成不耐、成臭腐、成可憎惡」〔T32 440b25〕 |
| 五行之標(甲段末) | 「以五行修行不耐食想,所謂以經營、以散用、以處、以流、以聚」〔T32 440b25–27〕 |
| 以經營修行·惡法(乙段) | 「問:云何以經營修行不耐食想」〔T32 440b27〕…「或乞索、或欺誑、詐現精進」〔T32 440c01–02〕…「見食如是,令起厭患」〔T32 440c02〕…「彼作惡業如是」〔T32 440c03–04〕 |
| 以經營修行·山林之對照(乙段續) | 「復見出家人,住清淨山林」〔T32 440c04〕…「是出家人修菩提處,等梵天居」〔T32 440c07〕…「如是當捨,求第一樂」〔T32 440c11–12〕 |
| 以經營修行·乞食之厭(乙段末) | 「復次見出家人修行」〔T32 440c12〕…「為得揣食生疑」〔T32 440c15〕…「或見彼食猶如狗食」〔T32 440c15–16〕…「如是以經營修行食不耐想」〔T32 440c17〕 |
單元界與問答界相合:起於 440b14 食不耐想之問,止於 440c17 經營一行之結;其下「云何散用修食不耐想」〔T32 440c17–18〕另起一行,屬下一單元。
標問八而「何處」無答(誌而不代補):開卷之問逐字實測八目(云何於食不耐想·何修·何相·何味·何處·何起·何功德·云何為修)〔T32 440b14–15〕;答文明說「彼想住不亂,此謂修」,並列過患為相、厭為味、伏氣味愛為起〔T32 440b16–18〕,故修、相、味、起四者有答,「何處」一問無答。四本於此無「何處」二字(見目三),從之則問七;其答文仍明列上述四者。並錄不判,照錄不代補。
八功德之數與所列相符:逐字實測八目(知揣食想·知五欲具足·知色陰·知不淨想·在身念成修滿·從氣味愛縮·離彼心·向善趣向醍醐)〔T32 440b19–21〕——與標數相符,與前之觀四大門(標八而底本標點所判七目)異。
全段定位錨
〔T32, 440b14–440c17〕
二、詞義與譯語(逐字各繫其錨)
| 名相 | 本段用法 | 章內接點(可核) |
|---|---|---|
| 不耐食想/食不耐想 | 「此謂不耐食想」〔T32 440b16〕;「如是以經營修行食不耐想」〔T32 440c17〕 | 一門二稱並用:逐字實測本門(440b14–441a09)「不耐食想」十三見、「食不耐想」三見,二稱交錯而非一處之異。照錄不代畫一 |
| 何處(無答之問) | 「何味?何處?何起?」〔T32 440b14–15〕 | 答文明出修、相、味、起而不出處〔T32 440b16–18〕;四本無此二字(見目三)。照錄不代補 |
| 伏氣味愛為起 | 「伏氣味愛為起」〔T32 440b18〕;「從氣味愛縮」〔T32 440b20〕 | 「氣味愛」本段二見;捨門作「伏恚愛為起」〔T32 437c15〕,二處同以伏某愛為起之式立 |
| 揣食 | 「知揣食想」〔T32 440b19〕;「為得揣食生疑」〔T32 440c15〕 | 本段二見,全論十二見;譯語難詞,論文不自釋,不代考定 |
| 成得八功德 | 「成得八功德」〔T32 440b18〕 | 此語全論三見〔429b20–21·438b28–29·440b18〕;本段一見,且所列與標數相符 |
| 百味經營 | 「如是種種百味經營」〔T32 440b23〕 | 「經營」為五行之首,本單元逐字實測九見;其義兼備辦與求索二面,論文不自辨 |
| 等梵天居 | 「是出家人修菩提處,等梵天居」〔T32 440c07〕 | 全論一見;論文不更釋,不代考定 |
| 修菩提處 | 「是出家人修菩提處」〔T32 440c07〕 | 其後另列寒熱風塵泥雨、捉鉢入家乞食與心起厭患〔440c08–11〕 |
三、校記與異讀
本段範圍內大正藏校記四處,均誌而不改;本文之讀依大正本,惟末一條從訂正之讀(見下):
| 錨 | 底本 | 異讀 | 見證 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 440b14 | 何處(何味?何處?何起?) | 〔-〕 | 【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 |
| 440b16 | 不(彼作意悉不耐) | 而 | 【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 |
| 440b25 | 惡(成可憎惡) | 污 | 【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 |
| 440b28 | 困 | 因——訂正之讀 | 【CB】【麗-CB】 |
誌錄不判二事:
- 440b14「何處」二字四本俱無——若從四本則問七目,與慈悲喜捨四門之七問齊;從底本則問八目而「何處」一問無答。並錄不判,本文從底本、不代補其答。
- 440b16「彼作意悉不耐」之「不」,四本作「而」——若從四本則此字非不,語不可通;從底本則與門名相貫。並錄不判,本文從底本。
本文不從大正一條:440b28 大正本作「困」,訂正本作「因」;本文從訂正之讀而作「為經營飲食因」。此類訂正在本卷(〈行門品〉之五)之窗內凡三條〔438a06·438b08·440b28〕,全論凡五十;本編既往所遇者在〔T32 430b01·434a02·434a16·434b03〕。
缺字零命中;夾註零命中。
五、譬喻·修辭
- 山林、乞食與厭患之列〔T32 440c04–440c16〕:先列出家人所居(花香·禽獸吟嘯·樹影林水·平舒淨妙·無諸喧雜·等梵天居),再列其乞食所經(寒熱風塵泥雨·馬象惡獸·狗野猪·踐踏泥屎·於他家門少時默住);兩段各自明說「心起厭患」或「於食起厭」,不另補其心理因果。
- 或字之列:惡法作「或殺害、或偷盜」〔T32 440b29〕與「或乞索、或欺誑、詐現精進」〔T32 440c01–02〕——「或」字四見而所舉之行五,末者不冠「或」,不代配其數;乞食之處作「或於馬象惡獸中、或狗野猪處、或惡人所、或不淨處」〔T32 440c12–14〕四處。二列同式而一齊一不齊。
- 「猶如狗食」〔T32 440c15–16〕:本行之喻,人食與狗食相擬;次單元復以「如狗嘔吐」〔T32 440c21–22〕再取狗為喻——食不耐想一門二取狗喻。
- 飲食入身前後之列〔T32 440b23–25〕:入身前列百味經營、清淨人所貴重、色香具足所堪大貴;入身後列變成不淨、成不耐、成臭腐、成可憎惡。
六、章內互讀
- 前指:觀四大之竟「(觀四大已竟)」〔T32 440b13〕;「成得八功德」之他二見〔T32 429b20–21·438b28–29〕;捨門「伏恚愛為起」〔T32 437c15〕與本段「伏氣味愛為起」〔T32 440b18〕同式。
- 後指:「云何散用修食不耐想」〔T32 440c17–18〕——五行之第二至第五於彼始,至「(不耐食想已竟)」〔T32 441a09〕而收。
- 同卷他門:「知不淨想」〔T32 440b20〕之名見十不淨諸單元;「在身念成修滿」〔T32 440b20〕之「身念」見念身諸單元;二處論文不自繫,不代連。
七、傳本
作者、譯者與傳本諸問題,本編不於考據內立說。
Location of the complete passage. This passage is from fascicle eight, the fifth part of the Chapter on the Doorways of Practice in the Path of Freedom. It follows the inline note completing contemplation of the four great elements 〔T32 440b13〕 and opens the perception-of-repulsiveness-in-food doorway among the thirty-eight fields of practice. It gives the characteristic, function, arousing, and eight virtues; names five modes and explains the first, procurement. The base text has two paragraphs 〔T32 440b14–440c17〕.
I. Sectional Location
Two paragraphs can be checked word for word:
| Section | Verbatim boundaries with anchors |
|---|---|
| Eight questions together (paragraph 1) | “Question: What is the perception of repulsiveness in food?” 〔T32 440b14〕 … “What is its virtue? How is it cultivated?” 〔T32 440b15〕 |
| Definition (paragraph 1 continued) | “With respect to the food one eats and tastes, one attends to all of it as repulsive” 〔T32 440b15–16〕 … “this is called the perception of repulsiveness in food” |
| Cultivation, characteristic, function, arousing (paragraph 1 continued) | “For that perception to remain without distraction is called cultivation” 〔T32 440b16–17〕 … “taking the faults of food is its characteristic, repugnance its function, subduing craving for flavor its arousing” 〔T32 440b17–18〕 |
| Eight virtues (paragraph 1 continued) | “Accomplishes eight virtues. If one cultivates the perception of repulsiveness in food” 〔T32 440b18–19〕 … “tends toward a good destination and toward the cream” 〔T32 440b21〕 |
| General method (paragraph 1 continued) | “How is it cultivated?” 〔T32 440b21〕 … “attends to the food one eats and tastes as repulsive” 〔T32 440b22–23〕 … “many flavors obtained through procurement” 〔T32 440b23〕 … “becomes repulsive, putrid, and loathsome” 〔T32 440b25〕 |
| Heading of five modes (end of paragraph 1) | “The perception of repulsiveness in food is cultivated in five modes: through procurement, dispersed use, place, flow, and aggregation” 〔T32 440b25–27〕 |
| Cultivation through procurement: evil actions (paragraph 2) | “Question: How is the perception of repulsiveness in food cultivated through procurement?” 〔T32 440b27〕 … “begging, deceiving, and falsely displaying energy” 〔T32 440c01–02〕 … “seeing food thus, he arouses repugnance” 〔T32 440c02〕 … “beings perform evil actions in this way” 〔T32 440c03–04〕 |
| Cultivation through procurement: contrast with the forest dwelling (paragraph 2 continued) | “He further sees renunciants dwelling in pure mountain forests” 〔T32 440c04〕 … “this is a place where renunciants cultivate awakening, equal to a Brahmā dwelling” 〔T32 440c07〕 … “thus it should be relinquished and the foremost pleasure sought” 〔T32 440c11–12〕 |
| Cultivation through procurement: repugnance in alms-gathering (end of paragraph 2) | “He further sees renunciants practicing” 〔T32 440c12〕 … “uncertain whether they will receive morsel food” 〔T32 440c15〕 … “at times they see that food is like dog food” 〔T32 440c15–16〕 … “in this way the food-repulsiveness perception is cultivated through procurement” 〔T32 440c17〕 |
The unit boundary agrees with the question-and-answer boundary. It begins with the question on the perception of repulsiveness in food at 440b14 and ends with the close of the procurement mode at 440c17. “How is the food-repulsiveness perception cultivated through dispersed use?” 〔T32 440c17–18〕 begins the next mode and belongs to the next unit.
Eight questions are stated, but “place” receives no answer. The opening contains eight items: what the perception is, cultivation, characteristic, function, place, arousing, virtue, and how it is cultivated 〔T32 440b14–15〕. The answer expressly gives cultivation, characteristic, function, and arousing 〔T32 440b16–18〕, but no answer for “place.” Four witnesses omit the two graphs 何處 (section III), yielding seven questions. Both are recorded; no answer is supplied.
The eight virtues agree with their heading. The items are knowing the perception of morsel food, knowing fulfillment of the five desires, knowing the material aggregate, knowing the perception of impurity, fulfilling cultivation of mindfulness of the body, drawing back from craving for flavor, departing from that mind, and tending toward a good destination and the cream 〔T32 440b19–21〕. There are eight, unlike the preceding four-elements doorway, where a heading of eight and the punctuation of the base yield seven items.
Complete passage anchor
〔T32, 440b14–440c17〕
II. Terms and Translation
| Term | Use in this passage | Checkable connection |
|---|---|---|
| 不耐食想 / 食不耐想 | “This is called the perception of repulsiveness in food” 〔T32 440b16〕; “in this way the food-repulsiveness perception is cultivated through procurement” 〔T32 440c17〕 | One doorway uses both forms. Across 440b14–441a09, 不耐食想 occurs thirteen times and 食不耐想 three times. Their order is not regularized. |
| Place, an unanswered question | “What is its function? What is its place? What is its arousing?” 〔T32 440b14–15〕 | The answer gives cultivation, characteristic, function, and arousing but no place 〔T32 440b16–18〕. Four witnesses omit “what place” (section III). No answer is supplied. |
| Subduing craving for flavor as arousing | “Subduing craving for flavor is its arousing” 〔T32 440b18〕; “draws back from craving for flavor” 〔T32 440b20〕 | “Craving for flavor” occurs twice here. The equanimity doorway similarly has “subduing craving for anger as arousing” 〔T32 437c15〕; the phrases remain in their own passages. |
| Morsel food | “Knows the perception of morsel food” 〔T32 440b19〕; “uncertain whether they will receive morsel food” 〔T32 440c15〕 | 揣食 occurs twice here and twelve times in the treatise. It is a difficult translated term and receives no independent lexical determination here. |
| Accomplishes eight virtues | “Accomplishes eight virtues” 〔T32 440b18〕 | The phrase occurs three times in the treatise 〔T32 429b20–21〕 〔T32 438b28–29〕 〔T32 440b18〕. Here the list agrees with the number. |
| Many flavors obtained through procurement | “Many flavors obtained through procurement” 〔T32 440b23〕 | Procurement is the first of five modes and occurs nine times in this unit. Its uses include both preparing and seeking food; the treatise does not distinguish two technical senses. |
| Equal to a Brahmā dwelling | “This is a place where renunciants cultivate awakening, equal to a Brahmā dwelling” 〔T32 440c07〕 | Occurs once in the whole treatise and receives no further explanation. |
| Place for cultivating awakening | “This is a place where renunciants cultivate awakening” 〔T32 440c07〕 | The passage then separately lists cold, heat, wind, dust, mud, rain, taking the bowl, entering homes, gathering alms, and arousing repugnance 〔T32 440c08–11〕. |
III. Critical Notes and Variant Readings
There are four critical notes in this span. The Taishō reading is followed except at the last, where the corrected reading is adopted:
| Anchor | Base or adopted reading | Variant | Witnesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| 440b14 | 何處, “what place,” in the sequence of questions | two graphs absent | 【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 |
| 440b16 | 不 in “attends to all of it as repulsive” | 而 | 【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 |
| 440b25 | 惡 in “becomes loathsome” | 污 | 【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 |
| 440b28 | 困, Taishō | 因, adopted reading | 【CB】【麗-CB】 |
Two matters are recorded without decision:
- At 440b14, four witnesses omit 何處, “what place.” Under them the opening has seven questions, like the doorways of loving-kindness, compassion, appreciative joy, and equanimity. Under the Taishō it has eight, while “place” receives no answer. Both are recorded; the base is followed and no answer is supplied.
- At 440b16, four witnesses read 而 for 不 in “attends to all of it as repulsive.” Under the witnesses the graph is not the negating form and the construction is obscure; under the base it agrees with the doorway name. Both are recorded; the base is followed.
One Taishō reading is not followed. At 440b28, the Taishō has 困, while the corrected text has 因. This edition adopts the correction and reads “for the sake of procuring food.” Within the window of fascicle eight, the fifth part of the chapter, there are three such corrections 〔T32 438a06〕 〔T32 438b08〕 〔T32 440b28〕; there are fifty in the treatise. Earlier corrections encountered in this edition stand at 〔T32 430b01〕 〔T32 434a02〕 〔T32 434a16〕 〔T32 434b03〕.
There are no missing-character or inline-note hits in this unit.
V. Similes and Rhetorical Forms
- Forest, alms-gathering, and repugnance 〔T32 440c04–440c16〕: the passage first lists where renunciants dwell—flower fragrance, cries of birds and beasts, tree shade, woods and water, level purity, freedom from clamor, equality to a Brahmā dwelling—and then what they traverse for alms—cold, heat, wind, dust, mud, rain, horses, elephants, fierce beasts, dogs, wild boars, treading in excrement, and silent standing at another’s door. Each paragraph itself says that the mind arouses repugnance or that one becomes repelled by food. No further psychological causation is added.
- Lists introduced by “or”: evil actions are “killing or stealing” 〔T32 440b29〕 and “begging or deceiving, falsely displaying energy” 〔T32 440c01–02〕. Four occurrences of “or” introduce five actions because the last lacks it; no count is imposed. Places traversed for alms are four: among horses, elephants, and fierce beasts; where dogs and wild boars are; among evil people; and in unclean places 〔T32 440c12–14〕. The two lists have similar forms, one uneven and one regular.
- “Like dog food” 〔T32 440c15–16〕: human food is compared with dog food. The next unit again uses a dog image, “like a dog’s vomit” 〔T32 440c21–22〕. The doorway has two dog similes.
- Food before and after entry into the body 〔T32 440b23–25〕: before entry come many flavors obtained through procurement, esteem by pure people, fullness of color and fragrance, and high value. After entry it changes into impurity and becomes repulsive, putrid, and loathsome.
VI. Cross-References Within the Chapter
- Backward: the inline completion of contemplation of the four great elements 〔T32 440b13〕; the other two occurrences of “accomplishes eight virtues” 〔T32 429b20–21〕 〔T32 438b28–29〕; and “subduing craving for anger as arousing” in the equanimity doorway 〔T32 437c15〕, which has the same grammatical form as “subduing craving for flavor as arousing” here 〔T32 440b18〕.
- Forward: “How is the food-repulsiveness perception cultivated through dispersed use?” 〔T32 440c17–18〕 begins the second through fifth modes. They continue through the inline note “the perception of repulsiveness in food is complete” 〔T32 441a09〕.
- Elsewhere in this fascicle: “knowing the perception of impurity” 〔T32 440b20〕 names a practice treated in the units on the ten impurities; “fulfilling cultivation of mindfulness of the body” 〔T32 440b20〕 names a practice treated in the mindfulness-of-body units. This passage does not itself connect the details, so none are imported.
VII. Transmission
This edition takes no position here on questions concerning the author, translator, or textual transmission.
Shi Huijing · Waken · The Path of Freedom · The Perception of Repulsiveness in Food: Overview and Procurement · Apparatus · Summer 2026