大智度論 往生品之上Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · Rebirth, Part 1 of 3
往生品之上:菩薩從何處來、往何處去(經+論)
如果眾生畢竟不可得,連菩薩之名也只是假名而無實法,那麼「從哪裡命終、來生此間,又將往生何處」豈不是多餘一問?〈往生品〉一開頭就把這道難題端出來,並立刻給出全品的樞紐——佛法有二諦:為世諦故說有眾生,為第一義諦故說眾生無所有。問往生,其實就是問菩薩的行處;而菩薩的行處,正落在無我無來去、卻不捨眾生往生的這一不二之地。於是佛先以三處答其來——或從他方佛國、或從兜率天上、或從人道中;再就其去廣分別,鋪陳種種往生之相。他方來者利根,人中來者根鈍,其別只在能否常值諸佛、能否以念佛三昧與般若疾疾相應。其後所列,無一不是同一件事的深化:有得法性生身的菩薩,變化身遍入三界而不受業繫;有以方便力入禪而不隨禪生、還來欲界大姓度眾生的菩薩;有梵天勸請轉法輪、兜率補處一生成佛、六神通遊戲十方讚歎三寶的菩薩。到了中卷,方便與定慧再往深處收:菩薩能入超越定而不落小乘定法之限,能不取四果卻以八聖道令眾生得果,甚至一切阿羅漢、辟支佛的果與智,在菩薩份上只是無生法忍的一角;淨業與麁業的分判,也從外相轉入「取法相即是罪、法不可得乃名淨佛道」的內裡。下卷則以五眼次第收束——肉眼、天眼求見,慧眼破虛誑而見實相,法眼分別眾生根器與位次,佛眼入金剛三昧盡照無餘;般若能生五眼,學五眼者得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。神通亦然:六神通一一自性空、自性離,除為薩婆若心而修;六度則各住畢竟空,如金剛山四面來風而心無動轉。最後歸於一切眾生中生等心、得一切諸法等,現世為十方諸佛所念,並以三百比丘捨衣發心、佛微笑授記六十一劫後成佛、十千人願生淨土號莊嚴王的公案作結——業因緣果報相續,不可思議。讀此品,不必先替往生安上一個實在的去處或來處;只須在每一種往生相裡看同一件事:所往是否仍向一切智與一切眾生,能度所度是否已在畢竟空中放輕。無眾生可得而遍生度眾,無來去可執而常值諸佛——這正是般若二諦所開的往生之路。
If beings are ultimately unfindable, and even the name ‘bodhisattva’ is only a provisional name with no real dharma behind it, then is it not a superfluous question to ask from where one’s life ended, whence one came to be born here, and where one will be reborn next? The Chapter on Rebirth sets this hard question on the table at its very opening, and at once gives the pivot of the whole chapter: in the Buddha’s Dharma there are two truths; for the sake of the worldly truth it is said that there are beings, and for the sake of the truth of the highest meaning it is said that beings have no existence. To ask about rebirth is in fact to ask about the bodhisattva’s place of practice, and the bodhisattva’s place of practice falls exactly on this non-dual ground, where there is no self and no coming or going, and yet beings and rebirth are not abandoned. So the Buddha first answers where the bodhisattva comes from with three places: from another Buddha-land, from the Tuṣita heaven, or from among humans; then he distinguishes at length where the bodhisattva goes, laying out the many marks of rebirth. Those who come from elsewhere are of keen faculties and those who come from among humans of dull faculties, and the difference lies only in whether they constantly meet the Buddhas and whether, by the samādhi of recollecting the Buddha, they come swiftly into accord with prajñā. Everything listed thereafter deepens this one matter: there are bodhisattvas who have obtained the body born of dharma-nature, whose transformation bodies enter the three realms everywhere without being bound by karma; there are bodhisattvas who by the power of skilful means enter the meditations yet are not born according to the meditations, but return to a great clan of the desire realm to deliver beings; there are bodhisattvas whom the Brahmā king entreats to turn the wheel of Dharma, bodhisattvas in Tuṣita who are one birth from buddhahood, and bodhisattvas who with the six supernormal powers roam at play through the ten directions praising the Three Jewels. By the middle fascicle, skilful means and concentration and wisdom are gathered deeper still: the bodhisattva can enter the leaping absorption without falling under the limits of the small vehicle’s laws of absorption, can decline the four fruits and yet, by the eightfold noble path, bring beings to attain the fruits, and indeed the fruits and knowledge of all arhats and pratyekabuddha are, on the bodhisattva’s side, but one corner of the acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas; and the division of pure from coarse karma turns from outward marks to the inside, where to grasp the mark of a dharma is itself offence, and the unfindability of dharmas is what is called purifying the Buddha path. The last fascicle closes with the sequence of the five eyes: the fleshly eye and the heavenly eye seek to see; the wisdom eye breaks through falsehood and sees the real mark; the Dharma eye distinguishes beings’ capacities and stages; the Buddha eye enters the vajra samādhi and illumines all without remainder. Prajñā can give birth to the five eyes, and one who trains in the five eyes attains anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. So too the supernormal powers: each of the six is empty of own-nature and apart from own-nature, cultivated for nothing but the mind set on sarvajñā; and the six perfections each dwell in ultimate emptiness, like a vajra mountain with winds coming from four sides while the mind does not stir. At the end it returns to giving rise to an equal mind toward all beings and attaining the equality of all dharmas, being held in mind in this very life by the Buddhas of the ten directions, and closes with the case of three hundred bhikṣu who offered their robes and aroused the mind, the Buddha smiling and predicting their buddhahood sixty-one kalpas hence, and ten thousand people vowing to be born in a pure land under the name King of Adornment: the continuity of karma, cause, condition, and fruit is inconceivable. In reading this chapter there is no need first to fit rebirth with a real place gone to or come from; one need only see the same one thing in every mark of rebirth: whether where one goes still faces omniscience and all beings, and whether deliverer and delivered have already been made light in ultimate emptiness. With no being to be found, one is born everywhere to deliver beings; with no coming or going to grasp, one constantly meets the Buddhas. This is the very path of rebirth that prajñā’s two truths open.
卷38 〔T25 0336b02〕
大智度論釋往生品第四之上
聖者龍樹造
後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯
【經】
舍利弗白佛言:「世尊!菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,能如是習相應者,從何處終,來生此間?從此間終,當生何處?」
佛告舍利弗:「是菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,能如是習相應者,或從他方佛國來生此間,或從兜率天上來生此間,或從人道中來生此間。
「舍利弗!從他方佛國來者,疾與般若波羅蜜相應;與般若波羅蜜相應故,捨身來生此間,諸深法要皆現在前,後還與般若波羅蜜相應,在所生處常值諸佛。
「舍利弗!有一生補處菩薩,兜率天上終,來生是間;是菩薩不失六波羅蜜,隨所生處,一切陀羅尼門、諸三昧門疾現在前。
「舍利弗!有菩薩人中命終、還生人中者,除阿毘跋致,是菩薩根鈍,不能疾與般若波羅蜜相應,諸陀羅尼門、三昧門不能疾現在前。」
【論】
問曰:
是般若波羅蜜中,眾生畢竟不可得;如上品說:「舍利弗!如一切眾生不可得,壽者、命者乃至知者、見者等眾生諸異名字,皆空無實。」此中何以問「從何所來,去至何所上」?眾生異名即是菩薩,眾生無故,菩薩亦無。又此經中說:「菩薩但有名字,無有實法。」今舍利弗何以作此問?
答曰:
佛法中有二諦:一者、世諦,二者、第一義諦。為世諦〔T25 0336c〕故,說有眾生;為第一義諦故,說眾生無所有。
復有二種:有知名字相,有不知名字相;譬如軍立密號,有知者,有不知者。
復有二種:有初習行,有久習行;有著者,有不著者;有知他意者,有不知他意者。
為不知名字相、初習行、著、不知他意者,故說「無眾生」。
為知名字相、久習行、不著、知他意者,故說言「有眾生」。
舍利弗以天眼明,見六道眾生生死善惡,於此無疑;但不知從他方無量阿僧祇世界諸菩薩來者,故問。有諸大菩薩從此間終,生他方無量阿僧祇佛國,舍利弗天眼所不見,故問。
復次,有聲聞人見菩薩行六波羅蜜,久住生死中,漏未盡故,集種種智慧、內外經書,而不證實際,未免生老病死,愍而輕之言:「此等命終,以三毒未盡故,當墮何處?如佛說:『諸凡夫人,常開三惡道門;於三善道為客,於三惡處為家。三毒力強,過去世無量劫罪業積集,而不取涅槃,將受眾苦,甚可愍之!』」如是等小乘人,輕愍是菩薩。
舍利弗於一切聲聞中為第一大法將,知有是事,欲令眾生起敬心於菩薩,故問。
佛以三事答:一、從他方佛國來生,二、從兜率天上來,三、從人道中來。
問曰:
如從他方佛國來者,以遠故,舍利弗不知;兜率天上、人道中來者,何以不知?
答曰:
舍利弗不知他方佛國來者故問;佛為如所應分別,答有三處來。
問曰:
世間有六道,何以故於天中別說兜率天來,人道中不分別處所,〔T25 0337a〕他方佛國來者亦不分別天道、人道?
答曰:
六趣中,三是惡道;惡道中來,受苦因緣,心鈍故,不任得道,是故不說。
問曰:
三惡道中來,亦有得道者。如舍利弗大弟子牛足比丘,五百世牛中生,末後得人身,足猶似牛,而得阿羅漢道。復有摩偷婆尸他比丘,五百世生獼猴中,末後得人身,得三明、六神通阿羅漢,猶好跳躑,以有餘習故。如是等皆得道,何以言不任?
答曰:
雖有得者,少不足言。又此人先世深種涅槃善根,小有謬錯,故墮惡道中;償罪既畢,涅槃善根熟故,得成道果。
此中不說聲聞道,但為得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提前身、後身次第。譬如從垢心起,不得次第入無漏,中間必有善有漏心,以無漏心貴故,言:「於三惡道出,不任次第得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。」天、人、阿修羅則不然。
下三天結使利而深,上二天結使深而不利,兜率天結使不深不利。所以者何?常有菩薩說法故,是故不說餘處;或有,少故不說。
色界諸天,得道者不復來下;未得道者,樂著禪味故不下,以著味故,智慧亦鈍,是故不說。
阿修羅同下二天,故不說。
他方佛國來者,從諸佛前來生是間,諸根猛利。所以者何?除無量阿僧祇劫罪故;又遇諸佛隨心教導故,如刀得好石則利;又常聞、誦、正憶念般若波羅蜜故利。如是等因緣,則菩薩心利。
人中來者,此間佛弟子聽般若波羅蜜,集諸功德,捨身還生是間,或於異國土。雖無有佛,值遇佛法,聽、〔T25 0337b〕受、書寫、正憶念,隨力多少,修福德、智慧。是人諸根雖鈍,堪受般若波羅蜜;以不見現在佛故心鈍。
他方佛國來者利根故,修行般若波羅蜜疾得相應;以相應故,常值諸佛。值佛因緣,如先說。
問曰:
兜率天上,何以但說一生補處,不說二生、三生?
答曰:
人身罪結煩惱處所,唯大菩薩處之則無染累。如鵝入水,水不令濕;如是菩薩,一切世間法所不能著。所以者何?佛自說因緣:「不失六波羅蜜,諸陀羅尼門、諸三昧門疾現在前。」是菩薩於是世界應利益眾生,其餘菩薩分布十方;譬如大智慧人已在一處,其餘大智則至異處,是故不說。
復次,有人言:但說大者,不限於小。
復次,餘天中來生者,餘處當廣說。
人中死人中生者,不如上二處。何以故?以人身地大多故,身重心鈍,以心、心數法隨身強弱故;又諸業結使因緣生故。
彼二處來者,是法身菩薩,變身無量以度眾生,故來生是間。人道中者,皆是肉身。
問曰:
阿毘跋致菩薩不以結業受身,何以故人道中說?
答曰:
來生此間,得阿毘跋致,未捨肉身故。以鈍根故,諸陀羅尼、三昧門不疾現在前;不疾現在前故,不疾與般若相應。
【經】
「舍利弗!汝所問『菩薩摩訶薩與般若波羅蜜相應,從此間終當生何處』者,舍利弗!此菩薩摩訶薩,從一佛國至一佛國,常值諸佛,終不離佛。
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩不以方便入初禪乃至第四禪,亦行六波羅蜜;是菩〔T25 0337c〕薩摩訶薩得禪故,生長壽天,隨彼壽終來生是間,得人身,值諸佛,是菩薩諸根不利。
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩入初禪乃至第四禪,亦行般若波羅蜜;不以方便故,捨諸禪,生欲界,是菩薩諸根亦鈍。
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩入初禪乃至第四禪,入慈心乃至捨,入虛空處乃至非有想非無想處,修四念處乃至八聖道分,行十力乃至大慈大悲;是菩薩用方便力,不隨禪生,不隨無量心生,不隨四無色定生;在所有佛處於中生,常不離般若波羅蜜行。如是菩薩,賢劫中當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」
【論】
問曰:
舍利弗今問前世、後世,佛何以故前世中三種答,後世中廣分別?
答曰:
人以肉眼不見過去、未來故而生邪疑;雖疑二處,而未來世當受,故廣分別。譬如已滅之火,不復求救,但多方便防未來火;又如治病,已滅之病不復加治,但治將生之病。
復次,佛無量辯才自恣,舍利弗所問雖少,佛廣為其說。如問「與般若波羅蜜相應」一事,而佛種種分別。如貧者從大富好施者乞,所乞雖少,所與甚多。佛亦如是,有無量無漏佛法具足之富,以大慈悲好行施惠;因舍利弗少問故,佛為大眾廣分別說。
復次,是般若波羅蜜中,種種因緣譬喻,多說空法。有新發意者,取空相,著是空法,於生死業因緣中生疑:「若一切法畢竟空,無來無去,無出無入相,云何死而有生?現在眼見法尚不應有,何況死後餘處生不可見而有!」如是等種種邪疑顛倒心。為斷是故,〔T25 0338a〕佛種種因緣廣說有死有生。
問曰:
無有死生因緣。何以故?人死歸滅,滅有三種:一者、火燒為灰,二者、虫食為糞,三者、終歸於土。今但見其滅,不見更有出者受於後身!以不見故,則知為無!
答曰:
若汝謂「身滅便無」者,云何有眾生先世所習憂喜怖畏等?如小兒生時,或啼或笑,先習憂喜故,今無人教而憂喜續生。又如犢子生知趣乳;猪羊之屬,其生未幾,便知有牝牡之合。
子同父母,好醜貧富,聰明闇鈍,各各不同;若無先世因緣者,不應有異!如是等種種因緣,知有後世。
又汝先言「不見別有去」者,人身中非獨眼根能見,身中六情各有所知:有法可聞、可嗅、可味、可觸、可知者;可聞法尚不可見,何況可知者!有生有死法,亦可見、亦可知;汝肉眼故不見,天眼者了了能見。如見人從一房出,入一房;捨此身至後身,亦如是。若肉眼能見者,何用求天眼?若爾者,天眼、肉眼,愚聖無異;汝以畜生同見,何能見後世?
可知者,如人死生雖無來去者,而煩惱不盡故,於身情意相續,更生身情意;身情意造業,亦不至後世,而從是因緣更生,受後世果報。譬如乳中著毒,乳變為酪,酪變為酥;乳非酪、酥,酪、酥非乳,乳、酪雖變而皆有毒。此身亦如是,今世五眾因緣故,更生後世五眾,行業相續不異故,而受果報。又如冬木,雖未有花葉果實,得時節會,則次第而出。
如是因緣,故知有死生。
復次,現世有知宿命者,如人行,疲極〔T25 0338b〕睡臥,覺已,憶所經由。
又一切聖人內外經書,皆說後世。
復次,現世不善法,動發過重,生瞋恚、嫉妬、疑悔內惱故,身則枯悴,顏色不悅。惡不善法,受害如是,何況起身業、口業!若生善法,淨信業因緣,心清淨,得如實智慧,心則歡悅,身得輕軟,顏色和適。以有苦樂因緣故,有善不善;今定有善不善故,當知必有後世。但眾生肉眼不見,智慧薄故而生邪疑,雖修福事,所作淺薄。譬如藥師為王療病,王密為起宅,而藥師不知;既歸見之,乃悔不加意盡力治王。
復次,聖人說今現在事實可信故,說後世事亦皆可信;如人夜行嶮道,導師授手,知可信故,則便隨逐。
比智及聖人語,可知定有後世。汝以肉眼重罪、比智薄故,又無天眼,既自無智,又不信聖人語,云何得知後世?
復次,佛法中諸法畢竟空,而亦不斷滅;生死雖相續,亦不是常;無量阿僧祇劫業因緣雖過去,亦能生果報而不滅;是為微妙難知。
若諸法都空者,此品中不應說往生,何有智者前後相違?若死生相實有,云何言「諸法畢竟空」?但為除諸法中愛著邪見顛倒故,說畢竟空,不為破後世故說。汝無天眼明故疑後世,欲自陷罪惡!遮是罪業因緣故,說種種往生。
佛法不著有,不著無,有無亦不著,非有非無亦不著,不著亦不著;如是人則不容難!譬如以刀斫空,終無所傷。為眾生故隨緣說法,自無所著。以是故《中論》中說:
〔T25 0338c〕
「一切諸法實,一切法虛妄,
諸法實亦虛,非實亦非虛!
涅槃際為真,世間際亦真,
涅槃世無別,小異不可得!」
是為畢竟空相。畢竟空,不遮生死業因緣,是故說往生。
問曰:
若般若波羅蜜一相,所謂無相,云何「與般若相應,從一佛國至一佛國,常值諸佛」?
答曰:
般若波羅蜜攝一切法,譬如大海,以是故不應作難!
復次,汝自說「般若波羅蜜一相,無相」,若無相,云何有難?汝則無相中取相,是事不然。
復次,因般若波羅蜜故,行念佛三昧等諸善法,生值諸佛。
復次,行般若波羅蜜者,深入大悲;如慈父見子為無所直物故死,父甚愍之,此兒但為虛誑故死!諸佛亦如是,知諸法畢竟空不可得,而眾生不知;眾生不知故,於空法中深著,著因緣故,墮大地獄。是故深入大悲;以大慈悲因緣故,得無量福德;得無量福德故,生值諸佛,從一佛國至一佛國。是菩薩從此間死,彼間生;彼間死,復至彼間生;如是乃至得佛,終不離佛。譬如有福之人,從一大會至一大會。或有是間死,彼間生,於彼以五神通力故,從一佛國至一佛國,供養諸佛,度脫眾生——是初菩薩。
「佛國」者,十方如恒河沙等諸三千大千世界,是名一佛土。
諸佛神力雖能普遍自在無礙,眾生度者有局。
「諸佛現在」者,佛現在其佛國土中者。
第二菩薩無方便入初禪,乃至行六波羅蜜。
「無方便」者,入初禪時,不念眾生,〔T25 0339a〕住時、起時亦不念眾生;但著禪味,不能與初禪和合行般若波羅蜜。是菩薩慈悲心薄故,功德薄少;功德薄少故,為初禪果報所牽,生長壽天。
復次,不能以初禪福德與眾生共迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。
如是等無量無方便義。
「長壽天」者,非有想非無想處,壽八萬大劫。
或有人言:一切無色定通名長壽天;以無形不可化故不任得道,常是凡夫處故。
或說無想天名為長壽,亦不任得道故。
或說從初禪至四禪,除淨居天,皆名長壽;以著味、邪見,不能受道者。
「還生人間值佛」者,以本發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心故,或於禪中集諸福德。所以者何?彼間著味,善心難生故。如經中說:「如佛問比丘:『甲頭土多?地上土多?』諸比丘言:『地土甚多,不可為喻!』佛言:『天上命終,還生人中者,如甲頭土;墮地獄者,如地土。』」
問曰:
「鈍根」者,二十二根中何者是?
答曰:
有人言:慧根能觀諸法,以久受著禪味故鈍。
有人言:信等五根皆助成道法,以受報著味故鈍。
有人言:菩薩清淨福德、智慧因緣故,十八根皆利;罪故則鈍。眼等六根,如《法華經》說。命根不為老、病、貧、窮等所惱,安隱受樂,是為命根利。喜、樂等五根了了覺知,故言利。復次,受樂時知樂無常等過隨逐,不生貪欲故利;餘受亦如是。信根牢堅深固,難事能信,故言利。餘亦應如是隨相分別。男根淨者,得陰藏相;不著細滑故,知欲為過,是為利。
復次,三善根利,故名為利;菩薩或時於〔T25 0339b〕三無漏根不證實際故利。
與利相違故鈍。
問曰:
第三菩薩若能捨禪,云何言「無方便」?
答曰:
是菩薩命終時,入不善心,捨諸禪定方便。
菩薩若入欲界繫善心、若無記心而捨諸禪,入慈悲心,憐愍眾生,作是念:「我若隨禪定生,不能廣利益眾生。」
生欲界者,有十處:四天下人,六欲天。三惡道,菩薩所不生。
鈍根者,如第二菩薩說。
第四菩薩,入位,得菩薩道,修三十七品,能住十八空乃至大慈大悲,此名方便。
上二菩薩,但有禪定,直行六波羅蜜,以是故無方便。
第四菩薩,方便力故,不隨禪、定、無量心生。所以者何?行四念處乃至大慈大悲故;命終時憐愍眾生,願生他方現在佛國,續與般若波羅蜜相應。所以者何?愛樂隨順般若波羅蜜故。
問曰:
此是何等菩薩?
答曰:
佛自說跋陀劫中菩薩,或有非跋陀劫中菩薩,但取其大者。
問曰:
云何名跋陀?云何名劫?
答曰:
如經說:「有一比丘問佛言:『世尊!幾許名劫?』佛告比丘:『我雖能說,汝不能知,當以譬喻可解:有方百由旬城,溢滿芥子,有長壽人過百歲持一芥子去;芥子都盡,劫猶不澌。又如方百由旬石,有人百歲持迦尸輕軟疊衣一來拂之;石盡,劫猶不澌。』」
時中最小者,六十念中之一念;大時名劫。
劫有二種:一為大劫,二為小劫。
大劫者,如上譬喻。劫欲盡時,眾生自然心樂遠離;樂遠離故,除五蓋,入初禪,是人離生喜樂;從是起已,舉聲大唱言:「諸眾生!甚可惡者是五欲,第一〔T25 0339c〕安隱者是初禪。」眾生聞是唱已,一切眾生心皆自然遠離五欲,入於初禪;自然滅覺觀,入第二禪,亦如是唱;或離二禪、三禪亦如是。三惡道眾生,自然得善心,命終皆生人中;若重罪者,生他方地獄,如〈泥犁品〉中說。是時三千大千世界,無一眾生在者;爾時,二日出,乃至七日出,三千大千世界地,盡皆燒盡。如「十八空」中,廣說劫生滅相。
復有人言:四大中三大有所動作,故有三種劫——或時火劫起,燒三千大千世界,乃至初禪四處;或時水劫起,漂壞三千大千世界,乃至二禪八處;或時風劫起,吹壞三千大千世界,乃至三禪十二住處。
是名大劫。
小劫亦三種:外三大發,故世界滅;內三毒發,故眾生滅,所謂飢餓、刀兵、疾病。
復有人言:時節歲數,名為小劫。如《法華經》中說:「舍利弗作佛時,正法住世二十小劫,像法住世二十小劫。佛從三昧起,於六十小劫中說《法華經》。」是眾小劫和合,名為大劫。
「劫簸」,秦言分別時節。
「跋陀」者,秦言善。
有千萬劫過去,空無有佛;是一劫中有千佛興,諸淨居天歡喜,故名為善劫。淨居天何以知此劫當有千佛?前劫盡已,廓然都空;後有大水,水底涌出有千枚七寶光明蓮華,是千佛之相;淨居諸天因是知有千佛。
以是故說「是菩薩於此劫中得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」。
【經】
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩,入初禪乃至第四禪,入慈心乃至捨,入空處乃至非有想非無想處;以方便力故不隨禪生,還生欲界若〔T25 0340a〕剎利大姓、婆羅門大姓、居士大家,成就眾生故。」
【論】
問曰:
菩薩有二種:一者、隨業生;二者、得法性身,為度眾生故,種種變化身生三界,具佛功德,度脫眾生。故二者之中,今是何者?
答曰:
是菩薩是業因緣生身。所以者何?入諸禪方便力故,不隨禪生。法身菩薩變化自在,則不大須方便。
入禪方便義,先已說。
問曰:
若不隨禪定,何以生於欲界,不生他方清淨世界?
答曰:
諸菩薩行各不同。或有菩薩於禪轉心,生他方佛國;菩薩迴心生欲界,亦如是。
問曰:
生他方佛國者,為是欲界、非欲界?
答曰:
他方佛國,雜惡不淨者,則名欲界。若清淨者,則無三惡道、三毒,乃至無三毒之名,亦無二乘之名,亦無女人。一切人皆有三十二相,無量光明,常照世間;一念之頃,作無量身,到無量如恒河沙等世界,度無量阿僧祇眾生,還來本處。如是世界在地上故,不名色界;無欲故,不名欲界;有形色故,不名無色界。
諸大菩薩福德清淨業因緣故,別得清淨世界,出於三界。
或有以大慈大悲心憐愍眾生故,生此欲界。
問曰:
若命終時,捨此禪定,初何以求學?
答曰:
欲界心狂不定,為柔軟攝心故入禪;命終時,為度眾生起欲界心。
問曰:
若生人中,何以故正生剎利等大家,不生餘處?
答曰:
生剎利,為有勢力;生婆羅門家,為有智慧;生居士家,為大富故,能利益眾生。貧窮中自不能利,何能益人?
生欲界天,次當說。
【經】
「舍利弗!復有菩薩摩訶薩,入初禪乃至第〔T25 0340b〕四禪,入慈心乃至捨,入空處乃至非有想非無想處,以方便力故不隨禪生;或生四天王天處,或生三十三天,夜摩天、兜率陀天、化樂天、他化自在天。於是中成就眾生、亦淨佛世界,常值諸佛。」
【論】
是義同上,生天為異。
問曰:
欲界諸天,情著五欲,難可化度,菩薩何以生彼,而不生人中?
答曰:
諸天著心雖大,菩薩方便力亦大。如說三十三天上,有須浮摩樹林,天中聖天,厭捨五欲,在中止住,化度諸天。兜率天上,恒有一生補處,諸菩薩常得聞法。密迹金剛力士,亦在四天王天上。如是等教化諸天。
【經】
「復次,舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩,行般若波羅蜜,以方便力入初禪,此間命終,生梵天處,作大梵天王。從梵天處,遊一佛國至一佛國,在所有諸佛得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,未轉法輪者,勸請令轉。」
【論】
問曰:
若隨初禪生,有何方便?
答曰:
雖生而不著味,念佛道,憶本願,入慈心,念佛三昧,時與禪和合,故名為方便。
問曰:
何以故作梵王?
答曰:
菩薩集福德因緣大故,世世常為物主,乃至生鹿中,亦為其王。
復次,是菩薩本願,欲請佛轉法輪,不應作散天。
或時此中三千大千世界無佛,從一佛國至一佛國,求見初成佛未轉法輪者。所以者何?梵天王法,常應勸請諸佛轉法輪故。
【經】
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩三生補處,行般若波羅蜜,以方便力入初禪乃至第四禪,〔T25 0340c〕入慈心乃至捨,入空處乃至非有想非無想處,修四念處乃至八聖道分,入空三昧、無相、無作三昧,不隨禪生,生有佛處,修梵行。
「若生兜率天上,隨其壽終,具足善根,不失正念;與無數百千億萬諸天,圍繞恭敬,來生此間,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」
【論】
問曰:
是三生菩薩,在十住地,已具足諸功德,今何以修習諸行?
答曰:
心未入涅槃,要有所行,所謂四禪乃至三三昧。
復次,是菩薩於天、人中,示行人法,修行求道。
復次,是菩薩雖在十住地,猶有煩惱習在;又於諸法猶有所不知,是故修道。
復次,是菩薩雖行深行,三十七品、三解脫門等,猶未取證;今為證故,更修諸行。
復次,雖是大菩薩,於佛猶小;譬如大聚火,雖有能照,於日則不現。如《放鉢經》中,彌勒菩薩語文殊尸利:「如我後身作佛,如恒河沙等文殊尸利,不知我舉足下足事!」以是故,雖在十住,猶應修行。
問曰:
三生菩薩,何以不廣度眾生,而要生佛前?
答曰:
是菩薩所度已多,今垂欲成佛,應在佛前。所以者何?非但度眾生得成佛,諸佛深法,應當聽聞故。
問曰:
若為諮問佛事故在佛前者,何以故釋迦文佛作菩薩時,在迦葉佛前,惡口毀呰?
答曰:
是事先已說,法身菩薩種種變化身以度眾生。或時行人法,有飢渴、寒熱、老病,憎愛、瞋喜、讚歎、呵罵等,除諸重罪,餘者皆行。
是釋迦文菩薩,爾時為迦葉佛弟,名欝多羅。兄智慧熟,不好多語;弟智慧未備故,多〔T25 0341a〕好論議,時人謂弟為勝。兄後出家,得成佛道,號名迦葉;弟為閻浮提王訖梨机師,有五百弟子,以婆羅門書,教授諸婆羅門,諸婆羅門等不好佛法。爾時,有一陶師,名難陀婆羅,迦葉佛五戒弟子,得三道,與王師欝多羅為善友,以其心善淨信故。爾時,欝多羅乘金車,駕四白馬,與弟子俱出城門;難提婆羅於路相逢,欝多羅問言:「從何所來?」答言:「汝兄得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,我供養還,汝可共行覲見於佛,故來相迎!」欝多羅作是念:「若我徑到佛所,我諸弟子當生疑怪:『汝本論議、智慧恒勝,今往供養,將是親屬愛故?』必不隨我。」恐破其見佛因緣故,住諸法實相智中,入無上方便慧,度眾弟子故,口出惡言:「此禿頭人,何能得菩提道!」
爾時,難提婆羅善友,為如瞋狀,捉頭挽言:「汝不得止?」欝多羅語弟子言:「其事如是,吾不得止!」即時師徒俱行詣佛;見佛光相,心即清淨,前禮佛足,在一面坐。佛為隨意說法,欝多羅得無量陀羅尼門,諸三昧門皆開;五百弟子還發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。欝多羅從坐起,白佛言:「願佛聽我出家作比丘!」佛言:「善來!」即成沙門。
以是方便故,現出惡言,非是實也。虛空可破,水可作火,火可作水,三生菩薩於凡夫中瞋心叵得,何況於佛!
問曰:
若爾者,佛何以受第八罪報六年苦行?
答曰:
小乘法與大乘法異,若無異者,不應有大、小。
小乘法中,不說「法身菩薩祕奧深法、無量不可思議神力」;多說〔T25 0341b〕「斷結使、直取涅槃法」。
復次,若佛不受是第八罪報,有諸天、神、仙、龍、鬼諸長壽者,見有此惡業而不受罪報,謂為無業報因緣;以是故,雖現在無惡業,亦受罪報。
又有今世因緣:諸外道等信著苦行,若佛不六年苦行,則人不信,言「是王子串樂,不能苦行」,以是故佛六年苦行。有外道苦行者,或三月、半歲、一歲,無能六年日食一麻一米者;諸外道謂此為苦行之極,是人若言無道,真無道也。於是信受,皆入正道。
以是二因緣故六年苦行,非實罪也。何以故?諸佛斷一切不善法、成就一切善法故;佛若實受罪報,不得言「成一切善法,斷一切不善法」。
復次,小乘法中,佛為小心眾生故,說二生菩薩猶惡口毀佛。二生菩薩,尚不罵小兒,云何實毀佛?皆是方便為眾生故。何以知之?是釋迦文佛,毘婆尸佛時作大婆羅門,見佛眾僧食疾而發是言:「如是人輩,應食馬麥!」因此罪故,墮黑繩等地獄,受無量世苦已;餘罪因緣,雖成佛道,而三月食馬麥。
又聲聞法中說:「佛過三阿僧祇劫,常為男子,常生貴處,常不失諸根,常識宿命,常不墮三惡道中。」
從毘婆尸佛來,九十一劫。如汝法,九十劫中,不應墮惡道,何況末後一劫!以是故知非是實也,方便故說。
問曰:
佛二罪,毘尼、雜藏中說,是可信受。三阿僧祇後百劫不墮惡道者,從初阿僧祇亦不應墮惡道,若不墮者,何以但說百劫?佛無是說,但是〔T25 0341c〕阿毘曇鞞婆沙論議師說!
答曰:
阿毘曇是佛說,汝聲聞人隨阿毘曇論議,是名鞞婆沙,不應有錯!
又如薄拘盧,以一訶梨勒果施僧,於九十一劫中不墮惡道,何況菩薩無量世來以身布施、修諸功德而以小罪因緣墮在地獄!
如是事,鞞婆沙不應錯!以是故,小乘人不知菩薩方便。
復次,聽汝鞞婆沙不錯,佛自說菩薩本起:「菩薩初生時,行七步,口自說言:『我所以生者,為度眾生故。』言已,默然。乳餔三年,不行、不語;漸次長大,行、語如法。」一切嬰孩,小時未能行、語,漸次長大,能具人法;今云何菩薩初生能行、能語,後便不能?當知是方便力故。若受是方便,一切佛語悉皆得通;若不受者,一實一虛!
如是種種因緣,知為度眾生故現行惡口。
問曰:
三生菩薩何以但生兜率天上,不生餘處?
答曰:
若在他方世界來者,諸長壽天龍鬼神求其來處不能知,則生疑心,謂為幻化。
若在人中死人中生,然後作佛者,人起輕慢,天則不信;法應天來化人,不應人化天也!是故天上來生,則是從天為人,人則敬信。
無色界中無形,不得說法,故不在中生。
色界中雖有色身,可為說法,而深著禪味,不能大利益眾生故,是故不在中生。
下三欲天,深厚結使,麁心錯亂;上二天結使既厚,心軟不利。
兜率天上,結使薄,心軟利,常是菩薩住處。譬如太子將登王位,先於靜室七日齋潔,然後登正殿受王位。補處菩薩亦如是,兜率天上如齋處,〔T25 0342a〕於彼末後受天樂;壽終來下,末後受人樂,便成阿毘三佛。
無量百千萬億諸天圍遶,來生是間。以菩薩先常於無始生死中,往反天上人間,今是末後天身,不復更來生天,是故咸皆侍送。菩薩於彼壽盡,當下作佛;諸天壽有盡者、不盡者,作願下生,為菩薩檀越。
復次,諸天下者,欲常侍衛菩薩,以有百億魔怨,恐來惱亂菩薩故。
此菩薩生人中,厭老病死,出家,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,如《菩薩本起經》中說。
【經】
「復次,舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩得六神通,不生欲界、色界、無色界;從一佛國至一佛國,供養恭敬尊重讚歎諸佛。
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩遊戲神通,從一佛國至一佛國,所至到處,無有聲聞、辟支佛乘,乃至無二乘之名。
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩遊戲神通,從一佛國至一佛國,所至到處,其壽無量。
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩遊戲神通,從一佛國至一佛國,所至到處,有無佛、法、僧處,讚佛、法、僧功德;諸眾生等以聞佛名、法名、僧名故,於此命終,生諸佛前。」
【論】
釋曰:
菩薩有二種:一者、生身菩薩,二者、法身菩薩。一者、斷結使,二者、不斷結使。
法身菩薩斷結使,得六神通;生身菩薩不斷結使,或離欲得五神通。
「得六神通」者,不生三界,遊諸世界,供養十方諸佛。
「遊戲神通」者,到十方世界度眾生,雨七寶;所至世界,皆一乘清淨,壽無量阿僧祇劫。
問曰:
菩薩法應度眾生,何以但至清淨無量壽佛〔T25 0342b〕世界中?
答曰:
菩薩有二種:一者、有慈悲心,多為眾生;二者、多集諸佛功德。
樂多集諸佛功德者,至一乘清淨無量壽世界;好多為眾生者,至無佛法眾處,讚歎三寶之音,如後章說。
【經】
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩初發意時,得初禪乃至第四禪,得四無量心,得四無色定,修四念處乃至十八不共法;是菩薩不生欲界、色界、無色界中,常生有益眾生之處。」
【論】
釋曰:
此菩薩或生無佛世界,或生有佛世界。
世界不淨,有三惡道,貧窮下劣;或生清淨世界。
至無佛世界,以十善道、四禪乃至四無色定,利益眾生;令信向三寶,稱說五戒及出家戒,令得禪定、智慧功德。
不清淨世界有二種:有現在佛,及佛滅度後。佛滅度後,或時出家,或時在家,以財施、法施種種利益眾生。若佛在世,作種種因緣引導眾生,令至佛所。
清淨世界者,眾生未具功德者,令其滿足,是名「在所生處利益眾生」。
【經】
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩,初發意時,行六波羅蜜,上菩薩位,得阿毘跋致地。
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩,初發心時,便得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,轉法輪,與無量阿僧祇眾生作益厚已,入無餘涅槃;是佛般涅槃後,餘法若住一劫,若減一劫。
「舍利弗!有菩薩摩訶薩,初發意時,與般若波羅蜜相應,與無數百千億菩薩,從一佛國至一佛國,為淨佛世界故。」
【論】
釋曰:
有三種菩薩,利根心堅,未發心前,久來集諸無量福德智慧;是人遇佛,聞是〔T25 0342c〕大乘法,發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,即時行六波羅蜜,入菩薩位,得阿鞞跋致地。所以者何?先集無量福德,利根心堅,從佛聞法故。
譬如遠行,或有乘羊而去,或有乘馬而去,或有神通去者。乘羊者久久乃到,乘馬者差速,乘神通者發意頃便到,如是不得言:「發意間云何得到?」神通相爾,不應生疑!菩薩亦如是,發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提時,即入菩薩位。
有菩薩初發意,初雖心好,後雜諸惡,時時生念:「我求佛道,以諸功德迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」是人久久無量阿僧祇劫,或至或不至。先世福德因緣薄,而復鈍根,心不堅固,如乘羊者。
有人前世,少有福德利根,發心漸漸行六波羅蜜,若三、若十、若百阿僧祇劫,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提;如乘馬者,必有所到。
第三乘神通者,如上說。
是三種發心:一者、罪多福少,二者、福多罪少,三者、但行清淨福德。
清淨有二種:一者、初發心時,即得菩薩道;二者、小住,供養十方諸佛,通達菩薩道故,入菩薩位,即是阿鞞跋致地。
「阿鞞跋致地菩薩」義,如先說。
次後菩薩,大厭世間,世世已來,常好真實,惡於欺誑。是菩薩亦利根、堅心,久集無量福德、智慧。初發心時,便得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,即轉法輪,度無量眾生,入無餘涅槃;法住若一劫、若減一劫,留化佛度眾生。佛有二種神通力:一者、現在時,二者、滅後。「劫」義,如上說。劫中所度眾生,亦復不少!
次後菩薩,亦利根、心堅,久集福德;發心即與般若波羅蜜相〔T25 0343a〕應,得六神通;與無量眾生,共觀十方清淨世界,而自莊嚴其國。如阿彌陀佛,先世時作法藏比丘,佛將導遍至十方,示清淨國,令選擇淨妙之國,以自莊嚴其國。
大智度論卷第三十八
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
舍利弗發問:修般若的菩薩,從哪裡命終來、往哪裡去
舍利弗對佛說:『世尊!這樣修行般若波羅蜜、能與般若如是相應的菩薩摩訶薩,是從哪裡命終而來生此間?又從此間命終,將往生何處?』
佛告訴舍利弗:『這樣修般若、能如是相應的菩薩,有的是從他方佛國命終來生此間,有的是從兜率天命終來生此間,有的是從人道命終來生此間。
『舍利弗!從他方佛國來的,很快就能與般若波羅蜜相應;因為相應的緣故,捨去前身來生此間時,種種深妙的法要都現前顯現,其後又能與般若相應,所生之處常能值遇諸佛。
『舍利弗!有一生補處菩薩,從兜率天命終來生此間;這位菩薩不失六波羅蜜,隨所生之處,一切陀羅尼門與諸三昧門都能迅速現前。
『舍利弗!也有從人中命終、還生人中的菩薩,除了阿毘跋致之外,這類菩薩根性較鈍,不能迅速與般若相應,諸陀羅尼門、三昧門也不能迅速現前。』
眾生畢竟空,為何還問「從何來、往何去」——二諦作答
以下是論釋。
有人問:般若波羅蜜中,眾生畢竟不可得。如前品所說:『舍利弗!一切眾生不可得,連壽者、命者乃至知者、見者等種種眾生的異名,都空無實體。』既然如此,這裡為什麼還問『從何處來、去到何處』?眾生的異名就是菩薩,眾生既無,菩薩也無;經中又說菩薩只有名字、沒有實法。舍利弗為何作此一問?
論主回答:佛法中有二諦,一是世諦,二是第一義諦。就世諦而言,說有眾生;就第一義諦而言,說眾生無所有。
眾生又可分兩類:有知道名字相的,有不知道名字相的,譬如軍中立下密號,有人知、有人不知。也可分兩類:有初學的、有久學的;有執著的、有不執著的;有能知他人心意的、有不能知的。對那些不知名字相、初學、執著、不知他意的人,就說『無眾生』;對那些知名字相、久學、不執著、能知他意的人,就說『有眾生』。
舍利弗以天眼之明,看見六道眾生的生死善惡,對此並無疑惑;只是他不知道那些從他方無量阿僧祇世界來的菩薩,所以發問。又有大菩薩從此間命終、生到他方無量阿僧祇佛國,這是舍利弗天眼所看不見的,所以發問。
再者,有聲聞人看見菩薩修六波羅蜜、久住生死之中,因煩惱未盡而積集種種世間內外經書、卻不證入實際,仍未免生老病死,於是憐憫又輕視地說:『這些人命終,因三毒未盡,將墮何處?如佛所說,凡夫常開三惡道之門,於三善道只是過客,於三惡處反像回家;三毒力強,過去無量劫積集的罪業又厚,卻不取涅槃,將受眾苦,實在可憐!』這樣的小乘人,就這般輕憫菩薩。舍利弗身為一切聲聞中第一大法將,知道有這樣的事,想令眾生對菩薩生起敬心,所以發問。
佛就以三事回答:一是從他方佛國來生,二是從兜率天來,三是從人道中來。
三處來的分別:為何獨舉兜率、不列惡道
有人問:從他方佛國來的,因為遙遠,舍利弗不知道;兜率天、人道中來的,他為何也不知道?答:舍利弗只是不知他方佛國來者,才發問;佛便隨其所應而分別,回答有三處來生。
又問:世間有六道,為何在天中特別說兜率天來,人道中不細分處所,他方佛國來者也不分別天道、人道?答:六趣中三道是惡道;從惡道來,因受苦的因緣而心性遲鈍,不堪得道,所以不說。
再問:三惡道中來的,也有得道的。像舍利弗的大弟子牛足比丘,五百世生在牛中,最後得人身而腳仍像牛,卻證得阿羅漢;又有摩偷婆尸他比丘,五百世生在獼猴中,最後得人身,證得三明六神通阿羅漢,只是還好跳躑,因為有餘習。這些都得了道,為何說不堪?答:雖有得道的,卻少得不足一提。而且這種人先世深種涅槃善根,只因小有差錯才墮惡道;償罪已畢、善根成熟,便得道果。這裡不是講聲聞道,而是講直趣無上菩提的前身後身次第。譬如從染污心起,不能直接接入無漏,中間必須有善的有漏心;因無漏心珍貴,所以說從三惡道出的人,不堪按次第直得無上菩提之心。天、人、阿修羅則不然。
下三天結使銳利而深,上二天結使深而不利,兜率天結使則不深不利。為什麼獨說兜率天?因為那裡常有菩薩說法;其餘天處,或有來者但因稀少而不說。色界諸天,得道的不再下來,未得道的又貪著禪味而不下,因著味而智慧鈍,所以不說。阿修羅同於下二天,也不說。
他方佛國來的,是從諸佛座前來生此間,諸根猛利。為什麼?因為除滅了無量阿僧祇劫的罪,又值遇諸佛隨心教導,如刀在好石上磨便利;又因常聞誦、正憶念般若波羅蜜而更利。這些因緣使菩薩心利。人中來的,是此間佛弟子聽聞般若、積集功德,捨身還生此間或異國;雖無佛在世,卻遇佛法,聽受、書寫、正憶念,隨力修福德智慧。這種人諸根雖鈍,仍堪受般若;只因未見現在佛而心鈍。他方佛國來者根利,修般若便迅速相應;因相應而常值諸佛,值佛的因緣如前所說。
又問:兜率天上,為何只說一生補處,不說二生、三生的?答:人身是罪業、結使、煩惱聚集之處,唯有大菩薩處於其中而不染累;如鵝入水,水不能沾濕它,菩薩也不被一切世間法所染。佛自說其因緣:『不失六波羅蜜,諸陀羅尼門、三昧門迅速現前。』這位菩薩應在此世界利益眾生,其餘菩薩則分布十方;譬如大智慧人已在一處,其餘大智便到別處,所以不說。又有人說,只舉大者,不限於小。又有人說,其餘天來生的,別處自會廣說。至於人中死、人中生的,就不如上二處;因為人身地大偏多,身重心鈍,心與心數法隨身的強弱而轉;又因種種業與結使的因緣而生。他方與兜率二處來的,是法身菩薩,變身無量以度眾生,才來生此間;人道中來的,都是肉身。
又問:阿毘跋致菩薩不因結業受身,為何仍歸在人道中說?答:他來生此間、於此得阿毘跋致,尚未捨去肉身;因根鈍,諸陀羅尼、三昧門不能迅速現前,因而也不能迅速與般若相應。
佛廣答後世:從一佛國到一佛國,終不離佛
佛說:『舍利弗!你所問「與般若相應的菩薩從此間命終、將生何處」,這樣的菩薩是從一佛國到一佛國,常值諸佛,終不離佛。
『舍利弗!有菩薩不以方便而入初禪乃至第四禪,也修六波羅蜜;這位菩薩因得禪定,生到長壽天,隨那裡的壽命終了再來生此間、得人身、值諸佛,只是諸根不利。
『舍利弗!有菩薩入初禪乃至第四禪、也修般若,卻因不用方便而捨去諸禪、生在欲界,這位菩薩諸根也鈍。
『舍利弗!有菩薩入四禪、四無量、四無色定,修四念處乃至八聖道分,行十力乃至大慈大悲;這位菩薩以方便力,不隨禪而生、不隨無量心而生、不隨四無色定而生,而在有佛之處受生,常不離般若之行。這樣的菩薩,將在賢劫中證得無上菩提。』
為什麼後世要廣說:有沒有死生
有人問:舍利弗同時問了前世、後世,佛為何前世只作三種答、後世卻廣加分別?答:人以肉眼看不見過去未來,因而生起邪疑;雖對兩處都疑,但未來世終將受報,所以廣為分別。譬如已滅之火不必再救,卻要多方防範未生之火;又如治病,已癒之病不必再治,卻要治將發之病。
再者,佛的辯才無量自在,舍利弗所問雖少,佛卻廣為演說。就像問『與般若相應』一事,佛便種種分別;如同貧者向大富好施的人乞討,所求雖少而所給甚多。佛也如此,具足無量無漏佛法之富,以大慈悲樂於布施;因舍利弗略問,便為大眾廣說。
再者,般若中以種種因緣譬喻多說空法。有新發意的人取著空相、執此空法,於生死業因緣中起疑:『若一切法畢竟空、無來無去、無出無入,怎會死後又有生?現前眼見之法尚且不應有,何況死後在別處受生而不可見!』為斷這種邪疑顛倒,佛才種種因緣廣說有死有生。
死後真有受生嗎——論主破斷滅見
有人問:根本沒有死生的因緣。為什麼?人一死就歸於滅,滅有三種:一是火燒成灰,二是虫食成糞,三是終歸於土。如今只見其滅,不見另有一物出來受後身;因為看不見,就知道沒有!
論主答:你若說『身滅即無』,那眾生為何會有前世所習的憂喜怖畏?如小兒出生便或哭或笑,是先世習慣憂喜,如今無人教而憂喜自續。又如牛犢一生下就知趣向母乳,猪羊之類出生未久就知牝牡交合。子女雖同父母所生,卻美醜、貧富、聰明愚鈍各各不同;若無先世因緣,不應有此差異。這些因緣,可知確有後世。
你又說『看不見另有一物離去』:人身中不只眼根能見,六情各有所知——有可聞、可嗅、可味、可觸、可知之法;可聞之法尚且不可見,何況可知之法!有生有死之法,也是可見、可知的,只是你以肉眼看不見,天眼者才了了能見。如見人從一室出、入另一室,捨此身而至後身也是如此。若肉眼便能看見,何須求天眼?若肉眼能見,那天眼、肉眼、愚人、聖人就沒有分別了;你既以畜生同等的所見為據,又怎能看見後世?
至於可知的道理:人死生時雖無一個來去之物,但因煩惱未盡,身、情、意相續而更生身、情、意;身情意所造之業,也不是有一物跑到後世,而是從這因緣更生、受後世果報。譬如乳中下了毒,乳變成酪、酪變成酥;乳不是酪酥、酪酥不是乳,乳酪雖變而都含毒。此身也如此:今世五眾為因緣,更生後世五眾,行業相續不異,因而受報。又如冬天的樹,雖尚無花葉果實,一遇時節便次第而出。這樣的因緣,故知確有死生。
再者,現世就有能知宿命的人,如人遠行疲極睡去、醒來便憶起所經之路。一切聖人的內外經書,也都說有後世。再者,現世造不善法、發動過重,因起瞋恚嫉妬疑悔而內惱,身便枯悴、顏色不悅;惡不善法受害如此,何況真起身業口業!若生善法、以淨信為業因,心清淨、得如實智慧,心便歡悅、身得輕軟、顏色和適。既有苦樂的因緣,就有善不善;既確有善不善,就當知必有後世。只是眾生肉眼不見、智慧薄弱而生邪疑,雖修福事也淺薄。譬如藥師為王治病,王暗中為他起造宅第而藥師不知;等到回去見了,才後悔當初沒有盡力治王。
再者,聖人所說現在之事真實可信,所說後世之事也都可信;如人夜行險道,導師伸手相授,因知可信便隨之而行。以推度之智與聖人之語,可知確有後世。你因肉眼罪重、推智又薄,又無天眼,既自無智、又不信聖人語,怎能知道後世?
畢竟空不遮往生:念佛三昧與初菩薩
再者,佛法中諸法畢竟空,卻也不斷滅;生死雖相續、也不是常;無量阿僧祇劫的業因緣雖已過去,仍能生果報而不滅——這是微妙難知之處。若諸法全空,此品就不應說往生,哪有智者前後自相矛盾?若死生之相實有,又怎能說『諸法畢竟空』?其實只為除去諸法中的愛著、邪見、顛倒才說畢竟空,並非為破後世才說。你因無天眼之明而疑後世,是想自陷罪惡;為遮這罪業因緣,佛才說種種往生。
佛法不著於有、不著於無,有無也不著,非有非無也不著,連『不著』也不著;這樣的人便不容人為難,譬如以刀斫空,終無所傷。為眾生隨緣說法,自己卻無所著。所以《中論》中說:一切諸法既是實、也是虛妄,諸法之實也即是虛,卻又非實非虛;涅槃之際是真、世間之際也是真,涅槃與世間並無分別,其間的細微差異也了不可得。這就是畢竟空之相。畢竟空並不遮止生死業因緣,所以說有往生。
有人問:若般若一相、所謂無相,怎會有『與般若相應、從一佛國到一佛國、常值諸佛』?答:般若攝一切法,譬如大海無所不容,所以不應以此為難。再者,你自己說般若一相無相,若真無相,又何來為難?你是在無相中取相,這不合理。再者,因般若之故而修念佛三昧等諸善法,便生而值遇諸佛。再者,修般若的人深入大悲:如慈父見孩子為了不值錢之物而死,父親深深憐憫,因為這孩子只為虛誑之事而死;諸佛也如此,知諸法畢竟空不可得,而眾生不知,於空法中深著,因執著而墮大地獄,所以佛深入大悲。以大慈悲的因緣得無量福德,因無量福德而生值諸佛,從一佛國到一佛國。這位菩薩從此間死、彼間生,彼間死、又往別處生,如是乃至成佛,終不離佛;譬如有福之人從一大會到另一大會。或有在此間死、彼間生,於彼以五神通力從一佛國到一佛國,供養諸佛、度脫眾生——這是第一種菩薩。
所謂『佛國』,是十方如恒河沙數的三千大千世界,合稱一佛土。諸佛神力雖能普遍自在無礙,但所度的眾生仍有分限。所謂『諸佛現在』,是指佛正住在其佛國土之中。
第二種菩薩,不以方便而入初禪、乃至修六波羅蜜。所謂『無方便』,是入初禪時不念眾生,安住、出定時也不念眾生,只貪著禪味,不能把初禪與般若和合而行。這位菩薩慈悲心薄,功德也薄少;因功德薄少,被初禪果報所牽,生到長壽天。再者,他不能把初禪福德與眾生共同迴向無上菩提。這樣的無方便還有無量義。所謂『長壽天』,指非有想非無想處,壽命八萬大劫。也有人說,一切無色定通名長壽天,因無形不可教化而不堪得道,常是凡夫之處;也有說無想天名為長壽,同樣不堪得道;也有說從初禪到四禪、除淨居天外都名長壽,因著味、邪見而不能受道。所謂『還生人間值佛』,是因本已發無上菩提心,或在禪中集了福德。為什麼強調這點?因那裡貪著禪味、善心難生。如經中說:佛問比丘『指甲上的土多,還是地上的土多』,比丘答『地土甚多,無可為喻』;佛便說,從天上命終還生人中的,如指甲上的土;墮地獄的,如大地之土。
又問:這裡說的『鈍根』,是二十二根中的哪一根?答:有人說是慧根能觀諸法,因久著禪味而鈍;有人說是信等五根皆助成道法,因受報著味而鈍;有人說菩薩因清淨福德智慧而十八根皆利、因罪而鈍。眼等六根,如《法華經》所說。命根不被老、病、貧、窮所惱、安隱受樂,是命根利。喜樂等五根了了覺知,是利;又受樂時能知樂為無常等過而不生貪欲,故利,其餘諸受也如此。信根牢堅深固、難信能信,故利,其餘也應如此隨相分別。男根清淨得陰藏相、不著細滑而知欲為過,是利。再者,三善根利故名為利;菩薩有時於三無漏根不證實際而顯其利。與利相違便是鈍。
又問:第三種菩薩既能捨禪,為何說『無方便』?答:這菩薩命終時入不善心而捨去諸禪定的方便;或入欲界所繫的善心、無記心而捨諸禪,入慈悲心憐愍眾生,心想『我若隨禪定而生,就不能廣利眾生』。生欲界者有十處:四天下之人與六欲天;三惡道是菩薩所不生。其鈍根之義,如第二種菩薩所說。
第四種菩薩,入位、得菩薩道,修三十七品,能住十八空乃至大慈大悲,這才名為方便。上二種菩薩只有禪定、直行六波羅蜜,所以無方便。第四種菩薩以方便力,不隨禪定無量心而生;因為修四念處乃至大慈大悲,命終時憐愍眾生,願生他方現在佛國、續與般若相應——因為愛樂隨順般若之故。
有人問:這是什麼樣的菩薩?答:佛自說是跋陀劫中菩薩,也有非跋陀劫中的,這裡只取其大者。又問:什麼叫跋陀?什麼叫劫?答:如經所說,有比丘問佛『多少才名一劫』,佛說『我雖能說,你不能知,當以譬喻可解』:有方圓百由旬的城,滿裝芥子,一長壽人每過百年取走一粒,芥子取盡而劫還不盡;又如方圓百由旬的石,有人每百年持柔軟的迦尸疊衣拂它一下,石磨盡而劫仍不盡。時間中最短的是六十念中的一念,最長的名劫。劫有兩種:一是大劫,二是小劫。
大劫如上譬喻。劫將盡時,眾生自然心樂遠離;因樂遠離而除五蓋、入初禪,得離生喜樂;從定起後高聲大唱:『諸眾生!最可厭惡的是五欲,最安隱的是初禪。』眾生聞唱,心皆自然遠離五欲、入初禪;再自然滅覺觀入第二禪,也如此唱;離二禪、三禪也如此。三惡道眾生自然得善心,命終都生人中;重罪的則生他方地獄,如〈泥犁品〉所說。這時三千大千世界無一眾生留存;於是二日出乃至七日出,大地盡皆燒盡,如〈十八空〉中廣說劫的生滅之相。又有人說,四大中三大有所動作,故有三種劫:或火劫起,燒大千世界乃至初禪四處;或水劫起,漂壞大千世界乃至二禪八處;或風劫起,吹壞大千世界乃至三禪十二住處。這名為大劫。
小劫也有三種:外三大發作,故世界壞滅;內三毒發作,故眾生壞滅,即飢餓、刀兵、疾病。又有人說,時節歲數名為小劫。如《法華經》中說,舍利弗作佛時正法住世二十小劫、像法住世二十小劫;佛從三昧起,於六十小劫中說《法華經》;眾小劫和合,名為大劫。『劫簸』,秦語譯作『分別時節』;『跋陀』,秦語譯作『善』。有千萬劫過去空無有佛,這一劫中卻有千佛興世,諸淨居天歡喜,故名善劫。淨居天怎知此劫當有千佛?前劫盡後廓然都空,後有大水,水底涌出千枚七寶光明蓮華,是千佛之相,淨居諸天因此得知。所以說『這位菩薩將在此劫中證得無上菩提』。
方便不隨禪生,還生剎利大姓成就眾生
佛說:『舍利弗!有菩薩入四禪、四無量、四無色定,以方便力不隨禪而生,而還生欲界,或生剎利大姓、婆羅門大姓、居士大家,為的是成就眾生。』
隨業生與法性身:兩種菩薩
有人問:菩薩有兩種,一是隨業受生的,二是得法性身、為度眾生而種種變化身生於三界、具佛功德度脫眾生;這裡所說是哪一種?答:這是業因緣所生之身。為什麼?因為靠入諸禪的方便力,才能不隨禪而生;法身菩薩變化自在,就不太須要方便。入禪的方便之義,前面已說。
又問:既不隨禪定,為何生在欲界、不生他方清淨世界?答:諸菩薩所行各不相同。有的菩薩於禪中轉心而生他方佛國;菩薩迴心生欲界,也是這樣。又問:生他方佛國,那算欲界還是非欲界?答:他方佛國雜惡不淨的,就名欲界;若清淨的,則無三惡道、無三毒,乃至連三毒之名、二乘之名都沒有,也沒有女人。那裡人人都有三十二相、無量光明常照世間;一念之頃能作無量身,到無量如恒河沙數的世界度無量阿僧祇眾生,再回到本處。這樣的世界因在地上,不名色界;因無欲,不名欲界;因有形色,不名無色界。諸大菩薩因福德清淨的業因緣,另得清淨世界,超出三界;也有的以大慈大悲憐愍眾生而生此欲界。
又問:既然命終時捨了禪定,起初為何還要修學禪定?答:欲界心狂散不定,為了柔軟攝心才入禪;命終時,為度眾生才起欲界心。又問:若生人中,為何正生剎利等大家、不生別處?答:生剎利為有勢力,生婆羅門家為有智慧,生居士家為大富,都能利益眾生;若生貧窮,自己尚不能自利,怎能利人?至於生欲界天,接著再說。
生欲界六天,成就眾生、常值諸佛
佛說:『舍利弗!又有菩薩入四禪、四無量、四無色定,以方便力不隨禪而生;或生四天王天、三十三天、夜摩天、兜率陀天、化樂天、他化自在天。在其中成就眾生、也淨佛世界,常值諸佛。』
論主說:此義同上,只是生天有別。有人問:欲界諸天貪著五欲、難以化度,菩薩為何生彼而不生人中?答:諸天著心雖大,菩薩的方便力也大。如說三十三天上有須浮摩樹林,天中的聖天厭捨五欲,止住其中教化諸天;兜率天上常有一生補處菩薩,諸菩薩常得聞法;密迹金剛力士也在四天王天上。這樣教化諸天。
入初禪生梵天作大梵王,勸請轉法輪
佛說:『再者,舍利弗!有菩薩修般若、以方便力入初禪,此間命終生梵天處作大梵天王;從梵天處遊行一佛國到一佛國,凡有諸佛得無上菩提而尚未轉法輪的,便勸請他轉法輪。』
有人問:既隨初禪而生,還有什麼方便?答:雖生梵天而不著禪味,念佛道、憶本願、入慈心、修念佛三昧,時時與禪和合,所以名為方便。又問:為何要作梵王?答:菩薩所集福德的因緣大,世世常為眾生之主,乃至生在鹿中也作鹿王。再者,這菩薩本願要勸請佛轉法輪,不應作散逸之天。有時此三千大千世界無佛,他便從一佛國到一佛國,尋求初成佛而未轉法輪的;因為梵天王之法,本應常勸請諸佛轉法輪。
三生補處菩薩:何以仍修諸行、迦葉佛前的惡口
佛說:『舍利弗!有三生補處的菩薩,修般若、以方便力入四禪、四無量、四無色定,修四念處乃至八聖道分,入空、無相、無作三昧,不隨禪而生,生在有佛之處修梵行。若生兜率天上,隨壽終了,具足善根、不失正念,與無數百千億萬諸天圍繞恭敬,來生此間,證得無上菩提。』
有人問:這三生菩薩已在十住地、具足諸功德,為何還修習諸行?答:因心尚未入涅槃,就必有所行,即四禪乃至三三昧。再者,這菩薩在天、人中示現凡人之法,修行求道。再者,他雖在十住地,仍有煩惱習氣,對諸法也還有所不知,所以修道。再者,他雖行深行、修三十七品與三解脫門,卻尚未取證,如今為證而更修諸行。再者,雖是大菩薩,對佛仍算小;譬如大火聚雖能照物,在日光下便顯不出。如《放鉢經》中彌勒菩薩對文殊尸利說:『如我後身作佛時,縱有恒河沙數的文殊尸利,也不知我舉足下足之事!』所以雖在十住,仍應修行。
又問:三生菩薩為何不廣度眾生,卻定要生在佛前?答:這菩薩所度已多,如今垂近成佛,應在佛前;因為不只度眾生才能成佛,諸佛的深法也應當聽聞。又問:若為諮問佛事而在佛前,那釋迦文佛作菩薩時,為何在迦葉佛前惡口毀罵?答:這事前面已說,法身菩薩以種種變化身度眾生;有時示行凡人之法,有飢渴寒熱老病、憎愛瞋喜、讚歎呵罵等,除諸重罪外其餘皆行。
這位釋迦文菩薩,當時是迦葉佛的弟弟,名叫欝多羅。兄長智慧成熟、不好多言;弟弟智慧未備而好論議,時人以為弟勝。兄後出家,成佛道號名迦葉;弟為閻浮提王的訖梨机師,有五百弟子,以婆羅門書教授諸婆羅門,這些婆羅門不好佛法。當時有一陶師名難陀婆羅,是迦葉佛的五戒弟子、已得三道,與王師欝多羅為善友,因其心善淨信。那時欝多羅乘金車、駕四白馬,與弟子出城門;難提婆羅在路上相逢,欝多羅問『從何處來』,答『你兄已得無上菩提,我供養歸來,你可同去覲見於佛,故來相迎』。欝多羅心想:『我若徑直到佛所,弟子們必生疑怪——你本來論議智慧常勝,今去供養,莫非為親屬之愛?——這樣必不隨我。』唯恐斷了弟子見佛的因緣,便安住諸法實相之智、入無上方便慧,為度眾弟子而口出惡言:『這禿頭人,怎能得菩提道!』難提婆羅這位善友假作瞋怒之狀,捉住他的頭髮拉扯說:『你還不肯停止?』欝多羅對弟子說:『事情如此,我停不下來了!』於是師徒同往詣佛;一見佛的光相,心即清淨,上前禮佛足、在一面坐下。佛隨其意說法,欝多羅得無量陀羅尼門、諸三昧門皆開,五百弟子也還發無上菩提心。欝多羅從座起,向佛請求出家作比丘;佛說『善來』,他即成沙門。可見這是以方便故而現出惡言,並非實有惡意。虛空尚可破、水可作火、火可作水,三生菩薩對凡夫尚且起不了瞋心,何況對佛!
又問:若是如此,佛為何受第八罪報、六年苦行?答:小乘法與大乘法不同,若無不同,就不應有大、小之別。小乘法中不說法身菩薩祕奧深法與無量不可思議神力,多說斷結使、直取涅槃之法。再者,佛若不受這第八罪報,那些長壽的天、神、仙、龍、鬼見有此惡業卻不受報,便會以為沒有業報因緣;所以佛雖現在無惡業,也示現受報。又有今世的因緣:諸外道信著苦行,佛若不六年苦行,人便不信,說『這王子慣於享樂、不能苦行』;所以佛六年苦行。外道苦行者或三月、半歲、一歲,卻無人能六年每日只食一麻一米;外道以此為苦行之極,這樣的人若說無道,那才真無道,於是信受而入正道。以這兩種因緣故六年苦行,並非實有罪報。為什麼?諸佛斷一切不善、成就一切善;佛若實受罪報,便不能說成一切善、斷一切不善。
再者,小乘法中,佛為心量小的眾生,說二生菩薩尚且惡口毀佛;可是二生菩薩連小兒都不罵,怎會實毀佛?這都是為眾生的方便。怎麼知道?這位釋迦文佛在毘婆尸佛時作大婆羅門,見佛與眾僧因病食粥而發言『這種人應該食馬麥』;因此罪墮黑繩等地獄,受無量世苦後,餘罪因緣使他雖成佛道仍三月食馬麥。聲聞法中又說:佛過三阿僧祇劫,常為男子、常生貴處、常不失諸根、常識宿命、常不墮三惡道。從毘婆尸佛以來已九十一劫;照你的法,九十劫中都不應墮惡道,何況最後一劫!所以可知這不是實事,而是方便說。
又問:佛的二罪在毘尼、雜藏中說到,可以信受;可是『三阿僧祇之後百劫不墮惡道』一說——若從初阿僧祇便不該墮惡道,何以只說百劫?佛沒這樣說,這只是阿毘曇鞞婆沙的論議師之說!答:阿毘曇是佛所說,你們聲聞人隨阿毘曇論議,才名鞞婆沙,不應有錯。又如薄拘盧只以一顆訶梨勒果施僧,便於九十一劫中不墮惡道;何況菩薩無量世來以身布施、修諸功德,竟因小罪而墮地獄?這樣的事,鞞婆沙不應有錯,所以小乘人不知菩薩的方便。再者,就算聽你說鞞婆沙不錯:佛自說菩薩本起——菩薩初生時行七步,口自言『我所以生,為度眾生』,說完便默然;乳哺三年,不行不語,漸長才如常行語。一切嬰孩幼時不能行語,漸長才具人法;如今菩薩怎會初生便能行語、後來反不能?可知是方便力故。若接受這方便,一切佛語都能通;若不接受,就成了一實一虛。這樣種種因緣,可知是為度眾生而示現惡口。
又問:三生菩薩為何只生兜率天、不生別處?答:若從他方世界來,那些長壽天龍鬼神求其來處而不能知,便生疑心,以為是幻化。若在人中死、人中生然後作佛,人會起輕慢、天也不信;按理應是天來化人、不應人來化天,所以從天上來生,是由天而為人,人便敬信。無色界中無形,不能說法,故不在其中生;色界中雖有色身可為說法,卻深著禪味、不能大利眾生,故也不生。下三欲天結使深厚、麁心錯亂;上二天結使既厚、心軟不利;兜率天結使薄、心軟而利,常是菩薩住處。譬如太子將登王位,先在靜室七日齋潔然後登殿受位;補處菩薩也如此,兜率天上如同齋處,在那裡末後受天樂,壽終來下再末後受人樂,便成正覺。無量百千萬億諸天圍繞來生此間;因菩薩過去在無始生死中往返天上人間,如今是末後天身、不再來生天,所以諸天都來侍送。菩薩於彼壽盡便下作佛;諸天中壽有盡、有不盡的,都發願下生作菩薩的檀越。再者,諸天下來要常侍衛菩薩,因恐有百億魔怨來惱亂菩薩。這菩薩生在人中,厭老病死而出家、得無上菩提,如《菩薩本起經》所說。
六神通菩薩:生身與法身、遊戲神通
佛說:『再者,舍利弗!有菩薩得六神通,不生欲界、色界、無色界,從一佛國到一佛國,供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎諸佛。舍利弗!有菩薩遊戲神通,從一佛國到一佛國,所到之處沒有聲聞、辟支佛乘,乃至無二乘之名。舍利弗!有菩薩遊戲神通,所到之處壽命無量。舍利弗!有菩薩遊戲神通,所到之處若有無佛、法、僧之處,便讚佛、法、僧的功德;眾生因得聞佛名、法名、僧名,於此命終便生諸佛之前。』
論主釋說:菩薩有兩種,一是生身菩薩,二是法身菩薩;一種斷結使,一種不斷結使。法身菩薩斷結使、得六神通;生身菩薩不斷結使,或因離欲而得五神通。所謂『得六神通』者,不生三界、遊諸世界、供養十方諸佛。所謂『遊戲神通』者,到十方世界度眾生、雨下七寶,所到世界皆一乘清淨、壽命無量阿僧祇劫。有人問:菩薩本應度眾生,為何只到清淨無量壽佛的世界中?答:菩薩有兩種,一種有慈悲心、多為眾生,一種多集諸佛功德;樂於多集諸佛功德的,到一乘清淨無量壽世界;好為眾生的,到無佛法僧之處讚歎三寶之音,如後章所說。
初發意即得四禪四無量,常生益眾生之處
佛說:『舍利弗!有菩薩初發意時便得四禪、四無量心、四無色定,修四念處乃至十八不共法;這菩薩不生三界,常生在有益眾生之處。』
論主釋說:這菩薩或生無佛世界、或生有佛世界。世界不淨的,有三惡道、貧窮下劣;或生清淨世界。若到無佛世界,便以十善道、四禪乃至四無色定利益眾生,使人信向三寶,宣說五戒與出家戒,令得禪定、智慧的功德。不清淨的世界有兩種:有現在佛的,與佛滅度後的。佛滅度後,或出家、或在家,以財施、法施種種利益眾生;若佛在世,便作種種因緣引導眾生到佛所。清淨世界的,眾生功德未具的令其滿足,這就是『在所生處利益眾生』。
三種初發意菩薩:三喻與法藏比丘的本願
佛說:『舍利弗!有菩薩初發意時便行六波羅蜜、上菩薩位、得阿毘跋致地。舍利弗!有菩薩初發心時便得無上菩提、轉法輪,與無量眾生作大饒益後入無餘涅槃;這佛般涅槃後,餘法或住一劫、或不足一劫。舍利弗!有菩薩初發意時便與般若相應,與無數百千億菩薩從一佛國到一佛國,為淨佛世界。』
論主釋說:有三種菩薩,利根心堅,未發心前久已集了無量福德智慧;這種人遇佛聞大乘法,發無上菩提心,即時行六波羅蜜、入菩薩位、得阿鞞跋致地。為什麼?因先集無量福德、利根心堅、又從佛聞法。譬如遠行,有的乘羊而去,有的乘馬,有的以神通去;乘羊的久久才到,乘馬的稍快,乘神通的一發意頃便到。既是神通之相,就不應懷疑『發意之間怎能到達』。菩薩也如此,發無上菩提心時即入菩薩位。
有的菩薩初發意時心雖好,後來卻雜諸惡,時時生念『我求佛道,以諸功德迴向無上菩提』;這種人久久經無量阿僧祇劫,或到或不到——因先世福德因緣薄、又復鈍根、心不堅固,如乘羊的。有人前世略有福德、根利,發心後漸漸行六波羅蜜,經三、十、百阿僧祇劫而得無上菩提,如乘馬的必有所到。第三種乘神通的,如上所說。這三種發心:一是罪多福少,二是福多罪少,三是但行清淨福德。清淨又有兩種:一是初發心時即得菩薩道,二是稍住、供養十方諸佛、通達菩薩道而入菩薩位,即是阿鞞跋致地。『阿鞞跋致地菩薩』之義,如前所說。
其次的菩薩,大厭世間,世世以來常好真實、厭惡欺誑;這菩薩也是利根堅心、久集無量福德智慧,初發心時便得無上菩提,即轉法輪、度無量眾生、入無餘涅槃;法住或一劫、或不足一劫,留下化佛度眾生。佛有兩種神通力,一是現在時,二是滅後。『劫』義如上所說;一劫中所度眾生也不少。
再其次的菩薩,也利根心堅、久集福德,發心便與般若相應、得六神通,與無量眾生共觀十方清淨世界而自莊嚴其國。如阿彌陀佛先世作法藏比丘時,佛引導他遍至十方、示現清淨之國,令他選擇淨妙之國以自莊嚴其國。
Śāriputra Asks: From Where Does the Bodhisattva Who Cultivates Prajñā Die and Come, and Where Does He Go?
Śāriputra said to the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! A bodhisattva-mahāsattva who practises prajñāpāramitā in this way and is able to be in accord with prajñā in this way—from where did he die before coming to be born here? And when he dies from here, where will he go to be reborn?’
The Buddha told Śāriputra: ‘A bodhisattva who cultivates prajñā in this way and is able to be in accord with it in this way—some die in the Buddha-lands of other quarters and come to be born here, some die in the Tuṣita Heaven and come to be born here, and some die in the human path and come to be born here.
‘Śāriputra! Those who come from the Buddha-lands of other quarters are quickly able to be in accord with prajñāpāramitā; because they are in accord, when they give up their former body and come to be born here, all kinds of deep and wondrous essentials of the Dharma appear before them, and afterwards they are again able to be in accord with prajñā, and wherever they are born they are always able to meet the Buddhas.
‘Śāriputra! There is the bodhisattva bound to one more birth, who dies in the Tuṣita Heaven and comes to be born here; this bodhisattva does not lose the six perfections, and wherever he is born, all the dhāraṇī gates and all the samādhi gates are able to appear before him swiftly.
‘Śāriputra! There are also bodhisattvas who die among humans and are born again among humans; apart from the avaivartika, bodhisattvas of this kind are of duller faculties, cannot swiftly be in accord with prajñā, and the dhāraṇī gates and samādhi gates also cannot appear before them swiftly.’
Beings Are Ultimately Empty, So Why Still Ask “Whence Do They Come, Whither Do They Go”?—Answered by the Two Truths
What follows is the treatise's explanation.
Question: In prajñāpāramitā, beings are ultimately not to be found. As was said in the previous chapter: ‘Śāriputra! All beings are not to be found; even the various other names for beings—life-holder, living one, and so on up to knower and seer—are all empty and without real substance.’ Since this is so, why is it asked here, ‘whence do they come, whither do they go’? Another name for beings is precisely bodhisattva; since beings do not exist, bodhisattvas do not exist either; and the sūtra also says that a bodhisattva is only a name and has no real dharma. Why does Śāriputra ask this question?
Answer: In the Buddha's Dharma there are two truths: the first is worldly truth, the second is the truth of the highest meaning. In terms of worldly truth, it is said that there are beings; in terms of the truth of the highest meaning, it is said that beings are without anything at all.
Beings can moreover be divided into two kinds: those who know the mark of names and those who do not know the mark of names—just as when a secret password is set up in an army, some know it and some do not. They can also be divided into two kinds: those who are beginners and those who have trained long; those who cling and those who do not cling; those who are able to know the intent of others and those who are not. For those who do not know the mark of names, are beginners, cling, and do not know the intent of others, it is said, ‘there are no beings’; for those who know the mark of names, have trained long, do not cling, and are able to know the intent of others, it is said, ‘there are beings’.
Śāriputra, by the clarity of the divine eye, sees the births and deaths, the good and evil, of the beings of the six paths, and has no doubt about this; it is only that he does not know those bodhisattvas who come from immeasurable asaṃkhyeya worlds of other quarters, and so he asks. Again, there are great bodhisattvas who die from here and are born in immeasurable asaṃkhyeya Buddha-lands of other quarters; this is something Śāriputra's divine eye cannot see, and so he asks.
Furthermore, there are śrāvakas who see the bodhisattva cultivating the six perfections and long abiding in the midst of birth and death, who, because his afflictions are not yet exhausted, accumulates all kinds of worldly scriptures, inner and outer, yet does not realise and enter the limit of reality, and still has not escaped birth, old age, sickness, and death; and so, with pity and also with contempt, they say: ‘When these people die, since the three poisons are not yet exhausted, where will they fall? As the Buddha has said, ordinary people always keep the gates of the three evil paths open; in the three good paths they are only passing guests, while in the three evil places it is as if they had come home. The power of the three poisons is strong, and the sinful deeds accumulated through immeasurable past kalpas are thick, yet they do not take nirvāṇa; they will undergo the host of sufferings—truly pitiable!’ People of the small vehicle such as these pity and belittle the bodhisattva in just this way. Śāriputra, as the foremost great general of the Dharma among all the śrāvakas, knows that there is such a thing and wishes to make beings give rise to a mind of reverence toward the bodhisattva, and so he asks.
The Buddha then answers with three matters: the first is coming to be born from the Buddha-lands of other quarters, the second is coming from the Tuṣita Heaven, the third is coming from within the human path.
The Distinctions among the Three Places of Origin: Why the Tuṣita Heaven Alone Is Named and the Evil Paths Are Not Listed
Question: Those who come from the Buddha-lands of other quarters, because they are far away, Śāriputra does not know; but those who come from the Tuṣita Heaven and from within the human path—why does he not know them either? Answer: Śāriputra did not know only those who come from the Buddha-lands of other quarters, and so he asked; the Buddha then made distinctions according to what was fitting and answered that there are three places from which one comes to be born.
Question: Again, there are six paths in the world; why, among the gods, is coming from the Tuṣita Heaven specially spoken of, while within the human path the places are not distinguished in detail, and for those who come from the Buddha-lands of other quarters the path of gods and the path of humans are not distinguished either? Answer: Among the six destinies, three paths are evil paths; those who come from the evil paths, because of the causes and conditions of undergoing suffering, are slow and dull of mind and not equal to attaining the path, and so they are not spoken of.
Question: Again, among those who come from the three evil paths there are also some who attain the path. Like Śāriputra's great disciple, the bhikṣu Ox-Foot, who was born among oxen for five hundred lives and at last gained a human body with feet still like an ox's, yet realised arhatship; and again the bhikṣu Motouposhita, who was born among monkeys for five hundred lives and at last gained a human body and realised arhatship with the three clear knowledges and six supernormal powers, only he still liked to leap and jump, because of residual habit. These all attained the path; why is it said they are not equal to it? Answer: Although there are some who attain the path, they are few and not worth mentioning. Moreover, such people in former lives had deeply planted roots of goodness for nirvāṇa, and fell into the evil paths only because of some small error; once their sin was repaid and their roots of goodness had ripened, they attained the fruit of the path. What is spoken of here is not the śrāvaka path, but the sequence of former and later bodies of one who heads straight for unsurpassed awakening. It is like this: arising from a defiled mind, one cannot pass directly into the undefiled; in between there must be a wholesome defiled mind. Because the undefiled mind is precious, it is said that people who come out of the three evil paths are not equal to directly obtaining, in sequence, the mind of unsurpassed awakening. Gods, humans, and asuras are not like this.
The fetters of the lower three heavens are sharp and deep; the fetters of the upper two heavens are deep but not sharp; the fetters of the Tuṣita Heaven are neither deep nor sharp. Why is the Tuṣita Heaven alone spoken of? Because there a bodhisattva is always teaching the Dharma; from the other heavens some may come, but because they are rare they are not spoken of. Of the gods of the form realm, those who have attained the path no longer come down, and those who have not attained the path are attached to the taste of meditation and do not come down; because they relish that taste, their wisdom is dull, and so they are not spoken of. The asuras are the same as the lower two heavens and are not spoken of either.
Those who come from the Buddha-lands of other quarters come to be born here from before the seats of the Buddhas, and their faculties are keen and sharp. Why? Because they have removed the sins of immeasurable asaṃkhyeya kalpas, and have also met the Buddhas, who instructed them according to their minds—like a knife sharpened on a good stone; and furthermore, because they constantly hear and recite prajñāpāramitā and rightly keep it in mind, they become sharper still. These causes and conditions make the bodhisattva's mind sharp. Those who come from among humans are the Buddha's disciples here who have heard prajñā and accumulated merit, who give up the body and are born again here or in another country; although there is no Buddha in the world, they meet the Buddha's Dharma, hear and receive it, write it out, rightly keep it in mind, and according to their strength cultivate merit and wisdom. Although the faculties of such people are dull, they are still equal to receiving prajñā; it is only because they have not seen a present Buddha that their minds are dull. Those who come from the Buddha-lands of other quarters have sharp faculties, and when they cultivate prajñā they are swiftly in accord with it; because they are in accord they always meet the Buddhas; the causes and conditions of meeting the Buddhas are as said before.
Question: Again, in the Tuṣita Heaven, why is only the one bound to one more birth spoken of, and not those bound to two or three more births? Answer: The human body is the place where sinful deeds, fetters, and afflictions gather; only a great bodhisattva dwells in it without being stained or burdened by it; as when a goose enters the water, the water cannot wet it, so too the bodhisattva is not stained by any worldly dharma. The Buddha himself stated its causes and conditions: ‘He does not lose the six perfections, and the dhāraṇī gates and samādhi gates swiftly appear before him.’ This bodhisattva ought to benefit beings in this world, while the other bodhisattvas are distributed through the ten directions; it is like this: when a person of great wisdom is already in one place, the other great wise ones go to other places; and so they are not spoken of. Again, some say that only the great one is mentioned, without being limited to the lesser. Again, some say that those who come to be born from the other heavens will be spoken of at length elsewhere. As for those who die among humans and are born among humans, they are not equal to the two places above; because in the human body the earth element is predominant, the body is heavy and the mind dull, and mind and the mental factors turn according to the strength or weakness of the body; and also because they are born through the causes and conditions of all kinds of deeds and fetters. Those who come from the two places, other quarters and the Tuṣita Heaven, are dharma-body bodhisattvas, who transform their bodies without measure to ferry beings across, and only so come to be born here; those who come from within the human path are all of fleshly body.
Question: Again, the avaivartika bodhisattva does not receive a body because of fetters and deeds; why is he still classed within the human path? Answer: He comes to be born here and attains avaivartika here, and has not yet given up the fleshly body; because his faculties are dull, the dhāraṇī and samādhi gates cannot appear before him swiftly, and therefore he also cannot swiftly be in accord with prajñā.
The Buddha Answers at Length about Later Lives: From One Buddha-land to Another Buddha-land, Never Apart from the Buddhas
The Buddha said: ‘Śāriputra! As for what you asked, “when a bodhisattva in accord with prajñā dies from here, where will he be born”—such a bodhisattva goes from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, always meets the Buddhas, and is never apart from the Buddhas.
‘Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who, without skilful means, enters the first meditation and so on up to the fourth meditation, and also cultivates the six perfections; because this bodhisattva has attained meditative absorption, he is born in a long-life heaven, and when his lifespan there comes to its end he comes again to be born here, gains a human body, and meets the Buddhas, only his faculties are not sharp.
‘Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who enters the first meditation and so on up to the fourth meditation and also cultivates prajñā, yet, because he does not use skilful means, he gives up the meditations and is born in the desire realm; the faculties of this bodhisattva are also dull.
‘Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who enters the four meditations, the four immeasurables, and the four formless absorptions, cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eightfold noble path, and practises the ten powers and so on up to great kindness and great compassion; this bodhisattva, by the power of skilful means, is not born according to the meditations, not born according to the immeasurable minds, not born according to the four formless absorptions, but receives birth where there is a Buddha, and is never apart from the practice of prajñā. Such a bodhisattva will realise unsurpassed awakening in the Auspicious Kalpa.’
Why Later Lives Are Spoken of at Length: Is There or Is There Not Death and Birth?
Question: Śāriputra asked about former lives and later lives at the same time; why did the Buddha give only a threefold answer about former lives, but make extensive distinctions about later lives? Answer: People, with the fleshly eye, cannot see the past and the future, and so give rise to wrong doubt; although they doubt about both, the future world is where they will in the end receive recompense, and so distinctions are made about it at length. It is like this: a fire already extinguished need not be put out again, yet one must guard in many ways against a fire not yet arisen; and again, as in treating illness, an illness already cured need not be treated again, yet one must treat the illness about to break out.
Furthermore, the Buddha's eloquence is immeasurable and sovereign; though what Śāriputra asked was little, the Buddha expounded it at length. Just as when asked the one matter ‘in accord with prajñā’, the Buddha made all kinds of distinctions; it is like a poor man begging from a very rich person who loves to give—what he seeks is little, but what he is given is very much. The Buddha is also like this: complete in the wealth of immeasurable undefiled Buddha-dharmas, with great kindness and compassion he delights in giving; because Śāriputra asked briefly, he spoke at length for the great assembly.
Furthermore, in prajñā, by all kinds of causes, conditions, and similes, the dharma of emptiness is much spoken of. There are people who have newly aroused the mind who seize on the mark of emptiness and cling to this dharma of emptiness, and give rise to doubt regarding the causes and conditions of the deeds of birth and death: ‘If all dharmas are ultimately empty, without coming and without going, without leaving and without entering, how can there be birth again after death? Even the dharmas seen before our eyes should not exist—how much less receiving birth elsewhere after death, which cannot be seen!’ It is to cut off such wrong doubt and inversion that the Buddha, by all kinds of causes and conditions, speaks at length of there being death and there being birth.
Is There Truly Rebirth after Death?—The Treatise-Author Refutes the View of Annihilation
Question: There are no causes and conditions of death and birth at all. Why? Once a person dies he returns to extinction, and extinction is of three kinds: the first is being burned by fire into ash, the second is being eaten by worms into dung, the third is in the end returning to earth. Now we see only its extinction, and do not see some other thing coming out to receive a later body; because it cannot be seen, we know it does not exist!
Answer: If you say, ‘when the body is extinguished there is nothing’, then why do beings have the sorrow and joy, fear and dread practised in former lives? Just as a small child, as soon as it is born, either cries or laughs—this is because in a former life it was accustomed to sorrow and joy, and now, though no one teaches it, sorrow and joy continue of themselves. Again, just as a calf, as soon as it is born, knows to go toward its mother's milk, and pigs, sheep, and the like, not long after birth, know the coupling of female and male. Although sons and daughters are born of the same parents, yet in beauty and ugliness, wealth and poverty, intelligence and dullness, each is different; if there were no causes and conditions from former lives, there should not be such differences. By these causes and conditions it can be known that there truly are later lives.
You also say, ‘one does not see some other thing departing’: in the human body it is not only the eye faculty that can see; each of the six sense-faculties has what it knows—there are dharmas that can be heard, smelled, tasted, touched, and known; if even dharmas that can be heard cannot be seen, how much less dharmas that can be known! The dharma of there being birth and there being death is also something that can be seen and can be known; it is only that you, with the fleshly eye, cannot see it, while one with the divine eye sees it clearly. Just as one sees a person go out of one room and enter another room, so too is giving up this body and arriving at a later body. If the fleshly eye could see it, why seek the divine eye? If the fleshly eye could see it, then there would be no distinction between the divine eye and the fleshly eye, between the foolish person and the sage; since you take as your ground what is seen on a par with the animals, how could you see later lives?
As for the reasoning by which it can be known: when a person dies and is born, although there is no one thing that comes and goes, yet because the afflictions are not exhausted, body, sense-faculties, and mind continue and give rise again to body, sense-faculties, and mind; as for the deeds done by body, sense-faculties, and mind, it is also not that some one thing runs off to a later life, but from these causes and conditions one is born again and receives the recompense of a later life. It is like putting poison into milk: milk turns into curd, curd turns into butter; milk is not curd or butter, curd and butter are not milk, and although milk and curd change, all of them contain the poison. This body is also like this: the five aggregates of this life serve as causes and conditions and give rise again to the five aggregates of a later life; the continuity of constructions and deeds is not different, and so one receives recompense. Again, it is like a tree in winter: although it has no flowers, leaves, or fruit yet, once it meets its season they come forth in sequence. By such causes and conditions it is known that there truly are death and birth.
Furthermore, in the present world there are people able to know their past lives, just as a person who has travelled far, exhausted, falls asleep, and on waking remembers the road he has passed along. The inner and outer scriptures of all the sages also all say that there are later lives. Furthermore, when in the present world one does unwholesome dharmas and they stir too heavily, because anger, jealousy, doubt, and regret arise and trouble one within, the body then withers and the complexion is unhappy; if unwholesome evil dharmas do harm even like this, how much more when one actually produces deeds of body and deeds of speech! If one gives rise to wholesome dharmas and takes pure faith as the causal deed, the mind is pure and one obtains wisdom that accords with reality, the mind then becomes glad, the body light and supple, and the complexion harmonious and at ease. Since there are causes and conditions of suffering and pleasure, there is the wholesome and the unwholesome; since there truly is the wholesome and the unwholesome, it should be known that there must be later lives. It is only that beings do not see with the fleshly eye and their wisdom is thin and weak, and so they give rise to wrong doubt, and though they cultivate deeds of merit these too are shallow and thin. It is like a physician treating a king's illness: the king secretly had a mansion built for him, and the physician did not know it; only when he returned home and saw it did he regret not having done his utmost in treating the king.
Furthermore, what the sages say about present matters is true and trustworthy, and what they say about matters of later lives is all trustworthy too; just as when a person travels a dangerous road by night and a guide reaches out a hand to him, because he knows the guide is trustworthy he follows and goes along. By the wisdom of inference and by the words of the sages, it can be known that there truly are later lives. Since your fleshly eye is heavy with sin, your inferential wisdom is also thin, and you have no divine eye, and you are yourself without wisdom and also do not believe the words of the sages—how could you know later lives?
Ultimate Emptiness Does Not Rule Out Rebirth: The Samādhi of Recollecting the Buddha and the First Bodhisattva
Furthermore, in the Buddha's Dharma all dharmas are ultimately empty, yet they are not annihilated either; although birth and death continue, they are not permanent either; although the causes and conditions of deeds of immeasurable asaṃkhyeya kalpas have passed away, they are still able to produce their recompense and are not extinguished—this is the subtle place that is hard to know. If all dharmas were entirely empty, then this chapter should not speak of rebirth—what wise person would contradict himself before and after? If the mark of death and birth really existed, then how could it be said that ‘all dharmas are ultimately empty’? In fact, ultimate emptiness is spoken of only to remove craving and clinging, wrong views, and inversions regarding dharmas; it is not spoken of in order to refute later lives. You doubt later lives because you lack the clarity of the divine eye, and so you wish to plunge yourself into sin and evil; it is to ward off these causes and conditions of sinful deeds that the Buddha speaks of all kinds of rebirth.
The Buddha's Dharma does not cling to existence, does not cling to non-existence, does not cling to both existence and non-existence, does not cling to neither existence nor non-existence, and does not cling even to ‘not clinging’; such a person then allows no one to find fault with him, just as when one hacks at empty space with a knife, in the end nothing is wounded. For beings he teaches the Dharma according to conditions, yet he himself clings to nothing. Therefore it is said in the Middle Treatise: all dharmas are real and also false; the reality of dharmas is itself false, yet they are neither real nor false; the limit of nirvāṇa is true and the limit of the world is also true; between nirvāṇa and the world there is no distinction, and even the finest difference between them is utterly not to be found. This is the mark of ultimate emptiness. Ultimate emptiness does not block the causes and conditions of the deeds of birth and death, and so it is said that there is rebirth.
Question: If prajñā is of one mark, that is to say, signless, how can there be ‘in accord with prajñā, going from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, always meeting the Buddhas’? Answer: Prajñā gathers in all dharmas, like the great ocean, which has nothing it does not contain; therefore one should not raise this as a difficulty. Furthermore, you yourself say that prajñā is of one mark and signless; if it is truly signless, how could any difficulty arise? You are seizing on a mark within the signless, and this is unreasonable. Furthermore, because of prajñā one cultivates the samādhi of recollecting the Buddha and other wholesome dharmas, and so one is born and meets the Buddhas. Furthermore, one who cultivates prajñā enters deeply into great compassion: just as a loving father, seeing his child die for the sake of something worthless, deeply pities him, because this child is dying only for a false and deceptive thing; the Buddhas are also like this—they know that all dharmas are ultimately empty and not to be found, yet beings do not know this and cling deeply within empty dharmas, and because of clinging fall into the great hells; therefore the Buddha enters deeply into great compassion. Through the causes and conditions of great kindness and compassion one obtains immeasurable merit, and because of immeasurable merit one is born and meets the Buddhas, going from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land. This bodhisattva dies here and is born there, dies there and again goes to be born elsewhere, and so on until he becomes a Buddha, never apart from the Buddhas—like a person with merit who goes from one great assembly to another great assembly. Or there are some who die here and are born there, and there, by the power of the five supernormal powers, go from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, making offerings to the Buddhas and ferrying beings across to liberation—this is the first kind of bodhisattva.
What is called ‘Buddha-land’ is three-thousand great-thousand worlds as many as the sands of the Ganges in the ten directions, which together are called one Buddha-field. Although the spiritual power of the Buddhas can pervade everywhere, sovereign and unobstructed, the beings they ferry across still have their limits. What is called ‘the Buddhas being present’ means that a Buddha is actually dwelling within his Buddha-land.
The second kind of bodhisattva, without skilful means, enters the first meditation and so on up to cultivating the six perfections. What is called ‘without skilful means’ is that when he enters the first meditation he is not mindful of beings, and when he abides in it and when he emerges from absorption he is not mindful of beings either; he is only attached to the taste of meditation, and cannot join the first meditation with prajñā and practise them together. This bodhisattva's mind of kindness and compassion is thin, and his merit is also thin and scant; because his merit is thin and scant, he is drawn by the recompense of the first meditation and is born in a long-life heaven. Furthermore, he cannot dedicate the merit of the first meditation, together with beings, to unsurpassed awakening. Such being-without-skilful-means has immeasurable further meanings. What is called ‘long-life heaven’ refers to the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception, whose lifespan is eighty thousand great kalpas. Some also say that all the formless absorptions are collectively named long-life heavens, because being without form they cannot be taught and are not equal to attaining the path, and they are always places of ordinary people; some also say that the heaven of non-perception is named long-life, likewise not equal to attaining the path; some also say that from the first meditation to the fourth meditation, except for the Pure Abodes, all are named long-life, because through relishing the taste and through wrong views they cannot receive the path. What is called ‘being born again among humans and meeting the Buddha’ is because he had already aroused the mind of unsurpassed awakening, or had gathered merit while in meditation. Why is this point stressed? Because there, attached to the taste of meditation, a wholesome mind is hard to produce. As is said in the sūtra: the Buddha asked the bhikṣus, ‘Is the soil on the fingernail more, or the soil on the ground more?’ The bhikṣus answered, ‘The soil of the ground is exceedingly more; there is nothing to compare it with.’ The Buddha then said that those who die in the heavens and are born again among humans are like the soil on the fingernail; those who fall into the hells are like the soil of the great earth.
Question: Again, the ‘dull faculties’ spoken of here—which of the twenty-two faculties is it? Answer: Some say it is the faculty of wisdom, which is able to contemplate dharmas, and which becomes dull through long attachment to the taste of meditation; some say it is the five faculties beginning with faith, which all help to accomplish the dharmas of the path, and which become dull through receiving recompense and relishing the taste; some say that the bodhisattva's eighteen faculties are all sharp because of pure merit and wisdom, and dull because of sin. The six faculties beginning with the eye are as said in the Lotus Sūtra. When the life faculty is not troubled by old age, sickness, poverty, or want, and one is at ease and receives pleasure, the life faculty is sharp. When the five faculties beginning with joy and pleasure are clearly aware, they are sharp; again, when receiving pleasure, one is able to know that pleasure has faults such as impermanence and does not give rise to greed and desire, and so it is sharp; the other feelings are also like this. The faculty of faith is firm, deep, and solid, able to believe what is hard to believe, and so it is sharp; the others too should be distinguished according to their marks in this way. The male faculty is pure, obtaining the mark of the sheathed organ, not attached to smooth and fine touch, and knowing desire to be a fault—this is sharp. Furthermore, because the three wholesome faculties are sharp, it is called sharp; the bodhisattva sometimes, in the three undefiled faculties, does not realise the limit of reality, and thereby shows their sharpness. What runs contrary to sharpness is dull.
Question: Again, since the third kind of bodhisattva is able to give up meditation, why is it said ‘without skilful means’? Answer: This bodhisattva, at the time of death, enters an unwholesome mind and gives up the skilful means of the meditative absorptions; or he enters a wholesome mind or an indeterminate mind bound to the desire realm and gives up the meditations, enters a mind of kindness and compassion and pities beings, thinking, ‘If I am born according to meditative absorption, I will not be able to benefit beings widely.’ Those born in the desire realm have ten places: the humans of the four continents and the six desire heavens; the three evil paths are where the bodhisattva is not born. The meaning of his dull faculties is as said for the second kind of bodhisattva.
The fourth kind of bodhisattva enters the stage, obtains the bodhisattva path, cultivates the thirty-seven limbs of the path, and is able to abide in the eighteen emptinesses and so on up to great kindness and great compassion; only this is named skilful means. The two kinds of bodhisattva above have only meditative absorption and practise the six perfections directly, and so they are without skilful means. The fourth kind of bodhisattva, by the power of skilful means, is not born according to meditative absorption or the immeasurable minds; because he cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to great kindness and great compassion, at the time of death he pities beings and vows to be born in the Buddha-lands of present Buddhas in other quarters and to continue to be in accord with prajñā—because he loves and delights in following prajñā.
Question: What kind of bodhisattva is this? Answer: The Buddha himself says he is a bodhisattva of the Bhadra kalpa; there are also those not of the Bhadra kalpa, but here only the great ones are taken. Question: Again, what is called bhadra? What is called kalpa? Answer: As the sūtra says, a bhikṣu asked the Buddha, ‘How long is it that is called one kalpa?’ The Buddha said, ‘Although I can tell it, you cannot know it; it can be understood by means of similes’: there is a city a hundred yojanas square and round, filled full with mustard seeds; a long-lived person takes away one seed every hundred years; the mustard seeds are taken away completely, yet the kalpa is still not exhausted. Again, there is a rock a hundred yojanas square and round, and a person every hundred years brushes it once with soft Kāśi folded cloth; the rock is worn away completely, yet the kalpa is still not exhausted. Of time, the shortest is one thought-moment among sixty thought-moments; the longest is named a kalpa. Kalpas are of two kinds: the first is the great kalpa, the second is the small kalpa.
The great kalpa is as in the similes above. When the kalpa is about to end, the minds of beings of themselves delight in distant separation; because they delight in separation, they remove the five hindrances and enter the first meditation, obtaining the joy and pleasure born of separation; on rising from absorption they call out in a loud voice: ‘Beings! Most to be loathed are the five desires; most secure is the first meditation.’ Beings, hearing the call, all of themselves in mind separate from the five desires and enter the first meditation; again of themselves they extinguish initial and sustained thought and enter the second meditation, and call out likewise; leaving the second meditation and the third meditation is likewise. Beings of the three evil paths of themselves obtain a wholesome mind, and at death are all born among humans; those with heavy sins are born in the hells of other quarters, as said in the Chapter on Niraya. At this time not a single being remains in the three-thousand great-thousand world; then two suns come out, and so on up to seven suns come out, and the great earth is entirely burned up, as the marks of the arising and perishing of the kalpa are spoken of at length in the section on the Eighteen Emptinesses. Again, some say that because three of the four great elements are active, there are three kinds of kalpa: either the fire kalpa arises, burning the great-thousand world up to the four places of the first meditation; or the water kalpa arises, sweeping away and destroying the great-thousand world up to the eight places of the second meditation; or the wind kalpa arises, blowing away and destroying the great-thousand world up to the twelve abodes of the third meditation. This is named the great kalpa.
Small kalpas are also of three kinds: because the outer three great elements break out, the world is destroyed; because the inner three poisons break out, beings are destroyed—namely famine, weapons, and pestilence. Again, some say that seasons and counts of years are named the small kalpa. As is said in the Lotus Sūtra: when Śāriputra becomes a Buddha, the true Dharma will abide in the world for twenty small kalpas, and the semblance Dharma will abide in the world for twenty small kalpas; the Buddha rose from samādhi and for sixty small kalpas spoke the Lotus Sūtra; many small kalpas together are named a great kalpa. ‘Kalpa’ is rendered in the language of Qin as ‘distinguishing the seasons’; ‘bhadra’ is rendered in the language of Qin as ‘good’. For thousands of myriads of kalpas that passed, they were empty and without a Buddha, but in this one kalpa a thousand Buddhas arise in the world, and the gods of the Pure Abodes rejoice; therefore it is named the Good Kalpa. How do the gods of the Pure Abodes know that in this kalpa there will be a thousand Buddhas? After the previous kalpa is exhausted, all is vast and empty; later there is a great water, and from the bottom of the water there well up a thousand shining lotus flowers of the seven jewels, which are the sign of the thousand Buddhas; from this the gods of the Pure Abodes come to know it. Therefore it is said, ‘this bodhisattva will realise unsurpassed awakening in this kalpa’.
By Skilful Means Not Born According to Meditation, He Is Born Again in Great Kṣatriya Clans to Bring Beings to Maturity
The Buddha said: ‘Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who enters the four meditations, the four immeasurables, and the four formless absorptions, and by the power of skilful means is not born according to the meditations, but is born again in the desire realm—born perhaps into a great kṣatriya clan, a great brahmin clan, or a great householder family—in order to bring beings to maturity.’
Born by Deeds and the Dharma-Nature Body: Two Kinds of Bodhisattva
Question: There are two kinds of bodhisattva: the first receives birth according to deeds; the second obtains the dharma-nature body and, to ferry beings across, is born in the three realms in all kinds of transformation bodies, complete with the Buddha's merits, and ferries beings across to liberation. Which kind is spoken of here? Answer: This is a body born of the causes and conditions of deeds. Why? Because only by relying on the power of skilful means in entering the meditations is one able not to be born according to the meditations; the dharma-body bodhisattva transforms sovereignly and has little need of skilful means. The meaning of the skilful means of entering meditation has already been spoken of above.
Question: Again, since he does not follow meditative absorption, why is he born in the desire realm and not in the pure worlds of other quarters? Answer: What the bodhisattvas practise is not the same for each. Some bodhisattvas, in meditation, turn the mind and are born in the Buddha-lands of other quarters; the bodhisattva turning his mind to be born in the desire realm is also like this. Question: Again, being born in a Buddha-land of another quarter—does that count as the desire realm or not the desire realm? Answer: A Buddha-land of another quarter that is mixed, evil, and impure is named the desire realm; if it is pure, then there are no three evil paths and no three poisons, and not even the name of the three poisons or the name of the two vehicles, and there are no women either. There everyone has the thirty-two marks, and immeasurable light constantly illumines the world; in the space of a single thought-moment they can make immeasurable bodies, go to immeasurable worlds as many as the sands of the Ganges, ferry across immeasurable asaṃkhyeya beings, and return again to their own place. Because such a world is on the ground, it is not named the form realm; because it is without desire, it is not named the desire realm; because it has shape and form, it is not named the formless realm. The great bodhisattvas, through the causes and conditions of the deeds of pure merit, obtain separately a pure world that goes beyond the three realms; there are also those who, with great kindness and great compassion, pity beings and are born in this desire realm.
Question: Again, since at the time of death he gives up meditative absorption, why did he at first cultivate and train in meditative absorption? Answer: The mind of the desire realm is wild, scattered, and unassured; it is to make the mind supple and gather it in that one enters meditation; at the time of death, it is to ferry beings across that one gives rise to the mind of the desire realm. Question: Again, if he is born among humans, why is he born precisely into great families such as the kṣatriya and not elsewhere? Answer: Being born a kṣatriya is for the sake of having power, being born into a brahmin family is for the sake of having wisdom, being born into a householder family is for the sake of great wealth—all these can benefit beings; if one is born poor and destitute, one cannot even benefit oneself, so how could one benefit others? As for being born in the heavens of the desire realm, that is spoken of next.
Born in the Six Heavens of the Desire Realm, Bringing Beings to Maturity and Always Meeting the Buddhas
The Buddha said: ‘Śāriputra! Again, there is a bodhisattva who enters the four meditations, the four immeasurables, and the four formless absorptions, and by the power of skilful means is not born according to the meditations; he is born perhaps in the heaven of the Four Heavenly Kings, the Heaven of the Thirty-Three, the Yāma Heaven, the Tuṣita Heaven, the Heaven of Delight in Transformation, or the Heaven Sovereign over Others' Transformations. There he brings beings to maturity, also purifies the Buddha-world, and always meets the Buddhas.’
The treatise-author says: This meaning is the same as above, only being born in the heavens is different. Question: The gods of the desire realm are attached to the five desires and hard to transform and ferry across; why is the bodhisattva born there and not among humans? Answer: Although the clinging mind of the gods is great, the bodhisattva's power of skilful means is also great. As it is said, in the Heaven of the Thirty-Three there is the Xufumo tree grove, where the noble gods among the gods, having wearied of and given up the five desires, stay and teach the gods; in the Tuṣita Heaven there is always the bodhisattva bound to one more birth, and the bodhisattvas are always able to hear the Dharma; the Secret-Traces Vajra strongman is also in the heaven of the Four Heavenly Kings. In this way the gods are taught.
Entering the First Meditation, He Is Born in the Brahmā Heaven as the Great Brahmā King and Requests the Turning of the Dharma Wheel
The Buddha said: ‘Furthermore, Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who cultivates prajñā and by the power of skilful means enters the first meditation; dying here, he is born in the Brahmā heaven and becomes the Great Brahmā King; from the Brahmā heaven he travels from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, and wherever there are Buddhas who have attained unsurpassed awakening but have not yet turned the Dharma wheel, he requests them to turn the Dharma wheel.’
Question: Since he is born according to the first meditation, what skilful means is there still? Answer: Although he is born in the Brahmā heaven, he is not attached to the taste of meditation; he is mindful of the Buddha path, remembers his original vow, enters the mind of kindness, cultivates the samādhi of recollecting the Buddha, and at all times joins these with meditation; therefore it is named skilful means. Question: Again, why must he be the Brahmā king? Answer: The causes and conditions of the merit the bodhisattva has gathered are great, and life after life he is always the lord of beings; even when born among deer he becomes the deer king. Furthermore, this bodhisattva's original vow is to request the Buddhas to turn the Dharma wheel, and he should not be a god who is scattered and idle. Sometimes this three-thousand great-thousand world has no Buddha, and so he goes from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, seeking one who has just become a Buddha and has not yet turned the Dharma wheel; because the rule of the Brahmā king is that he should always request the Buddhas to turn the Dharma wheel.
The Bodhisattva Bound to Three More Births: Why He Still Cultivates the Practices, and the Harsh Words before Kāśyapa Buddha
The Buddha said: ‘Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva bound to three more births who cultivates prajñā and by the power of skilful means enters the four meditations, the four immeasurables, and the four formless absorptions, cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eightfold noble path, enters the samādhi of emptiness, signlessness, and non-action, is not born according to the meditations, and is born where there is a Buddha and cultivates the pure life. If he is born in the Tuṣita Heaven, when his lifespan there comes to its end, complete in roots of goodness and not losing right mindfulness, surrounded and revered by countless hundreds of thousands of myriads of koṭi of gods, he comes to be born here and realises unsurpassed awakening.’
Question: This bodhisattva of three more births already dwells on the tenth abiding-ground and is complete in all merits; why does he still cultivate and practise the practices? Answer: Because the mind has not yet entered nirvāṇa, there must be something it practises, namely the four meditations and so on up to the three samādhi. Furthermore, this bodhisattva, among gods and humans, displays the ways of an ordinary person, cultivating practice and seeking the path. Furthermore, although he is on the tenth abiding-ground, he still has the habit-energies of the afflictions, and there are still dharmas he does not know, and so he cultivates the path. Furthermore, although he practises deep practices and cultivates the thirty-seven limbs of the path and the three gates of liberation, he has not yet taken realisation, and now, in order to realise, he cultivates the practices further. Furthermore, although he is a great bodhisattva, before the Buddha he is still small; it is like a great mass of fire, which, though able to illumine things, cannot show itself in the light of the sun. As in the Sūtra of the Released Bowl, Maitreya Bodhisattva said to Mañjuśrī: ‘When I become a Buddha in my last body, even if there were Mañjuśrīs as many as the sands of the Ganges, they would not know the matter of my lifting a foot and setting a foot down!’ Therefore, although he is on the tenth abiding, he should still cultivate practice.
Question: Again, why does the bodhisattva of three more births not ferry beings across widely, but must be born before a Buddha? Answer: This bodhisattva has already ferried many across, and now, drawing near to becoming a Buddha, he ought to be before a Buddha; because it is not only by ferrying beings across that one can become a Buddha—the deep dharmas of the Buddhas also ought to be heard. Question: Again, if it is in order to inquire of the Buddha about matters that he is before the Buddha, then when Śākyamuni Buddha was a bodhisattva, why did he revile and abuse Kāśyapa Buddha with harsh words before Kāśyapa Buddha? Answer: This matter has already been spoken of above: the dharma-body bodhisattva ferries beings across with all kinds of transformation bodies; at times he displays and practises the ways of an ordinary person, having hunger and thirst, cold and heat, old age and sickness, hatred and love, anger and joy, praise and scolding, and so on—apart from the grave sins, he practises all the rest.
This Śākyamuni Bodhisattva was at that time the younger brother of Kāśyapa Buddha, named Uttara. The elder brother's wisdom was mature, and he did not like to talk much; the younger brother's wisdom was not yet complete, yet he liked debate, and people at the time thought the younger brother superior. The elder brother later left home and attained the Buddha path, and his title was Kāśyapa; the younger brother became the Qiliji teacher to the king of Jambudvīpa, had five hundred disciples, and taught the brahmins with the books of the brahmins, and these brahmins did not like the Buddha's Dharma. At that time there was a potter named Nandipāla, a five-precept disciple of Kāśyapa Buddha who had already attained the three paths, and who was a good friend of the king's teacher Uttara, because his mind was good and had pure faith. At that time Uttara was riding a golden chariot drawn by four white horses, going out of the city gate with his disciples; Nandipāla met him on the road; Uttara asked, ‘Where have you come from?’ He answered, ‘Your elder brother has already attained unsurpassed awakening; I am returning from making offerings to him; you can come along with me to see the Buddha, and so I have come to meet you.’ Uttara thought: ‘If I go straight to where the Buddha is, my disciples will surely become suspicious and wonder—you were always the winner in debate and wisdom, and now you go to make offerings; could it be out of love for your kin?—and so they will surely not follow me.’ Fearing only that he would cut off his disciples' causes and conditions for seeing the Buddha, he abided in the wisdom of the real mark of all dharmas, entered the wisdom of unsurpassed skilful means, and, to ferry his disciples across, uttered harsh words: ‘This bald-headed man—how could he attain the path of awakening!’ Nandipāla, this good friend, put on a show of anger, seized him by the hair, and pulled him, saying: ‘Will you still not stop?’ Uttara said to his disciples: ‘Things being so, I cannot stop now!’ Then teacher and disciples went together to the Buddha; as soon as they saw the Buddha's radiant marks, their minds became pure, and they went forward, bowed at the Buddha's feet, and sat down to one side. The Buddha taught the Dharma according to their intent; Uttara obtained immeasurable dhāraṇī gates, and all the samādhi gates opened, and the five hundred disciples also aroused the mind of unsurpassed awakening. Uttara rose from his seat and asked the Buddha to let him leave home and become a bhikṣu; the Buddha said ‘Welcome!’, and he at once became a śramaṇa. It can be seen that these harsh words appeared for the sake of skilful means, and that there was in fact no evil intent. Empty space could still be broken, water could be made fire, and fire could be made water, but the bodhisattva of three more births cannot give rise to anger even toward ordinary people, how much less toward the Buddha!
Question: Again, if this is so, why did the Buddha undergo the recompense of the eighth sin and six years of ascetic practice? Answer: The Dharma of the small vehicle and the Dharma of the Great Vehicle are not the same; if they were not different, there should not be the distinction of great and small. In the Dharma of the small vehicle, the secret, profound, deep dharma of the dharma-body bodhisattva and the immeasurable, inconceivable spiritual powers are not spoken of; mostly spoken of is the dharma of cutting off the fetters and taking nirvāṇa directly. Furthermore, if the Buddha did not undergo this recompense of the eighth sin, then those long-lived gods, spirits, immortals, dragons, and ghosts, seeing that there was this evil deed and yet no recompense was undergone, would think that there are no causes and conditions of the recompense of deeds; therefore, although the Buddha presently has no evil deed, he displays the undergoing of recompense. There are also causes and conditions in the present life: those of the outside paths believe in and cling to ascetic practice, and if the Buddha did not practise asceticism for six years, people would not believe, saying, ‘This prince is used to enjoyment and cannot practise asceticism’; therefore the Buddha practised asceticism for six years. The ascetics of the outside paths practise for three months, half a year, or a year, but no one is able for six years to eat only one sesame seed and one grain of rice each day; those of the outside paths took this as the extreme of ascetic practice, and if such a person says there is no path, then there truly is no path; and so they believed and accepted and entered the right path. For these two kinds of causes and conditions he practised asceticism for six years; it was not really the recompense of a sin. Why? The Buddhas have cut off everything unwholesome and accomplished everything wholesome; if the Buddha really underwent the recompense of a sin, then it could not be said that he has accomplished everything wholesome and cut off everything unwholesome.
Furthermore, in the Dharma of the small vehicle, the Buddha, for beings of small capacity of mind, says that even a bodhisattva of two more births reviled the Buddha with harsh words; but the bodhisattva of two more births does not even scold a small child—how could he really revile the Buddha? This is all skilful means for the sake of beings. How is it known? This Śākyamuni Buddha, at the time of Vipaśyin Buddha, was a great brahmin; seeing the Buddha and the community of monks eating gruel because of illness, he uttered the words, ‘People of this kind ought to eat horse-barley’; because of this sin he fell into the Black Rope and other hells, and after undergoing suffering for immeasurable lives, the causes and conditions of the remaining sin made him, though he had attained the Buddha path, still eat horse-barley for three months. It is further said in the Dharma of the śrāvakas: the Buddha, passing through three asaṃkhyeya kalpas, was always a man, always born in noble places, never lacked any of his faculties, always knew his past lives, and never fell into the three evil paths. From Vipaśyin Buddha until now it has been ninety-one kalpas; by your own Dharma, in ninety kalpas he should not have fallen into the evil paths at all, how much less in the last kalpa! Therefore it can be known that this is not a real event, but a teaching by skilful means.
Question: Again, the Buddha's two sins are spoken of in the Vinaya and the Miscellaneous Canon, and can be believed and accepted; but the statement that ‘after the three asaṃkhyeya kalpas, for a hundred kalpas he does not fall into the evil paths’—if from the first asaṃkhyeya he should not fall into the evil paths, why is only a hundred kalpas spoken of? The Buddha did not say this; it is only the saying of the debating masters of the Abhidharma Vibhāṣā! Answer: The Abhidharma is spoken by the Buddha; it is you śrāvakas who, following the Abhidharma, debated, and only this is named Vibhāṣā; there should be no error in it. Again, just as Bakula, by giving only one harītakī fruit to the Saṅgha, did not fall into the evil paths for ninety-one kalpas—how much less would the bodhisattva, who for immeasurable lives has given his own body in giving and cultivated all merits, fall into hell because of a small sin? In such a matter the Vibhāṣā should not be in error; so it is that the people of the small vehicle do not know the bodhisattva's skilful means. Furthermore, even granting what you say, that the Vibhāṣā is not in error: the Buddha himself tells of the bodhisattva's origins—when the bodhisattva was first born he walked seven steps and said with his own mouth, ‘The reason I am born is to ferry beings across’, and having said this he fell silent; for three years he was nursed, neither walking nor speaking, and only as he grew did he walk and speak as usual. All infants when young cannot walk or speak, and only as they grow do they come to have the ways of human beings; now how could the bodhisattva be able to walk and speak when first born, yet afterwards be unable? It can be known that this is because of the power of skilful means. If one accepts this skilful means, all the Buddha's words can be reconciled; if one does not accept it, they become one real and one false. By all kinds of causes and conditions such as these, it can be known that the harsh words were displayed to ferry beings across.
Question: Again, why is the bodhisattva of three more births born only in the Tuṣita Heaven and not elsewhere? Answer: If he came from a world of another quarter, those long-lived gods, dragons, ghosts, and spirits would seek where he came from and be unable to know, and would give rise to a doubting mind, thinking him an illusory conjuration. If he died among humans and was born among humans and then became a Buddha, humans would give rise to contempt and the gods would not believe either; by right it should be gods who come to transform humans, not humans who come to transform gods; therefore he comes to be born from the heavens—from a god he becomes a human, and humans then revere and believe him. In the formless realm there is no shape, and one cannot teach the Dharma, so he is not born there; in the form realm, although there is a form body with which one could teach the Dharma, the gods are deeply attached to the taste of meditation and cannot greatly benefit beings, so he is not born there either. In the lower three desire heavens the fetters are deep and thick, and the coarse mind is confused and disordered; in the upper two heavens the fetters are thick and the mind soft and not sharp; in the Tuṣita Heaven the fetters are thin and the mind soft and sharp, and it is always the dwelling-place of bodhisattvas. It is like a crown prince about to ascend the throne, who first keeps a fast of purification for seven days in a quiet chamber and then ascends the hall and receives the throne; the bodhisattva who is to succeed to Buddhahood is also like this: the Tuṣita Heaven is like the place of fasting; there, for the last time, he enjoys heavenly pleasure; when his life ends he comes down and, for the last time, enjoys human pleasure, and then attains right awakening. Immeasurable hundreds of thousands of myriads of koṭi of gods surround him as he comes to be born here; because the bodhisattva in the past, in beginningless birth and death, went back and forth between the heavens and the human world, and this is now his last heavenly body and he will not again come to be born in the heavens, the gods all come to attend and see him off. When the bodhisattva's life there is exhausted he comes down and becomes a Buddha; among the gods, whether their life is exhausted or not, all make vows to be born below as the bodhisattva's patrons. Furthermore, the gods come down to guard the bodhisattva constantly, for fear that a koṭi of Māra-enemies might come to trouble and disturb the bodhisattva. This bodhisattva, born among humans, wearies of old age, sickness, and death and leaves home, and attains unsurpassed awakening, as said in the Sūtra of the Bodhisattva's Origins.
The Bodhisattva with the Six Supernormal Powers: Birth-Body and Dharma-Body, Sporting in the Supernormal Powers
The Buddha said: ‘Furthermore, Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who attains the six supernormal powers and is not born in the desire realm, the form realm, or the formless realm, but goes from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, making offerings to, revering, honouring, and praising the Buddhas. Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who sports in the supernormal powers and goes from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, and wherever he arrives there is no vehicle of the śrāvakas or pratyekabuddhas, and not even the name of the two vehicles. Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who sports in the supernormal powers, and wherever he arrives the lifespan is immeasurable. Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who sports in the supernormal powers, and wherever he arrives, if there is a place without Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha, he praises the merits of the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Saṅgha; because beings get to hear the name of the Buddha, the name of the Dharma, and the name of the Saṅgha, when they die there they are born before the Buddhas.’
The treatise-author explains: There are two kinds of bodhisattva: the first is the birth-body bodhisattva, the second is the dharma-body bodhisattva; one kind cuts off the fetters, the other kind does not cut off the fetters. The dharma-body bodhisattva cuts off the fetters and attains the six supernormal powers; the birth-body bodhisattva does not cut off the fetters, or, through separation from desire, attains the five supernormal powers. What is called ‘attaining the six supernormal powers’ is not being born in the three realms, travelling through the worlds, and making offerings to the Buddhas of the ten directions. What is called ‘sporting in the supernormal powers’ is going to the worlds of the ten directions to ferry beings across, raining down the seven jewels, and in the worlds he reaches, all are of the one vehicle and pure, with lifespans of immeasurable asaṃkhyeya kalpas. Question: The bodhisattva ought to ferry beings across; why does he go only into the pure worlds of Buddhas of immeasurable life? Answer: There are two kinds of bodhisattva: one kind has a mind of kindness and compassion and acts mostly for beings; one kind mostly gathers the merits of the Buddhas. Those who delight in gathering much of the Buddhas' merits go to the worlds of the one vehicle, pure and of immeasurable life; those who love to act for beings go to places without Buddha, Dharma, and Saṅgha and make the sound praising the Three Jewels, as a later section says.
From the First Arousing of the Mind He Attains the Four Meditations and Four Immeasurables and Is Always Born Where He Benefits Beings
The Buddha said: ‘Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who, at the first arousing of the mind, at once attains the four meditations, the four immeasurable minds, and the four formless absorptions, and cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas; this bodhisattva is not born in the three realms, but is always born where there is benefit for beings.’
The treatise-author explains: This bodhisattva is born perhaps in a world without a Buddha, perhaps in a world with a Buddha. A world that is impure has the three evil paths, poverty, and baseness; or he is born in a pure world. If he goes to a world without a Buddha, he benefits beings with the ten wholesome paths of action, the four meditations, and so on up to the four formless absorptions, causes people to believe in and turn toward the Three Jewels, proclaims the five precepts and the precepts of leaving home, and enables them to obtain the merits of meditative absorption and wisdom. Impure worlds are of two kinds: those with a present Buddha, and those after the Buddha's passing into extinction. After the Buddha's passing into extinction, whether leaving home or staying at home, he benefits beings in all kinds of ways with the giving of wealth and the giving of Dharma; if the Buddha is in the world, he makes all kinds of causes and conditions to lead beings to where the Buddha is. In pure worlds, beings whose merits are not yet complete he causes to be fulfilled; this is ‘benefiting beings in the places where he is born’.
Three Kinds of Bodhisattva of the First Arousing of the Mind: Three Similes, and the Original Vow of the Bhikṣu Dharma Treasury
The Buddha said: ‘Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who, at the first arousing of the mind, at once practises the six perfections, ascends to the bodhisattva stage, and attains the ground of avaivartika. Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who, at the first arousing of the mind, at once attains unsurpassed awakening and turns the Dharma wheel, and after bringing great benefit to immeasurable beings enters nirvāṇa without remainder; after this Buddha's parinirvāṇa, his remaining Dharma abides either for one kalpa or for less than one kalpa. Śāriputra! There is a bodhisattva who, at the first arousing of the mind, is at once in accord with prajñā, and with countless hundreds of thousands of koṭi of bodhisattvas goes from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, in order to purify the Buddha-worlds.’
The treatise-author explains: There are three kinds of bodhisattva, of sharp faculties and firm mind, who before arousing the mind had long since gathered immeasurable merit and wisdom; such people meet a Buddha and hear the Dharma of the Great Vehicle, arouse the mind of unsurpassed awakening, at once practise the six perfections, enter the bodhisattva stage, and attain the ground of avaivartika. Why? Because they first gathered immeasurable merit, are of sharp faculties and firm mind, and also heard the Dharma from the Buddha. It is like travelling far: some go riding a sheep, some riding a horse, some go by supernormal power; the one riding the sheep arrives only after a long, long time, the one riding the horse somewhat faster, the one riding supernormal power arrives in the moment of a single thought. Since it is the mark of supernormal power, one should not doubt, ‘how can one arrive in the space of a thought?’ The bodhisattva is also like this: when he arouses the mind of unsurpassed awakening he at once enters the bodhisattva stage.
Some bodhisattvas, at the first arousing of the mind, though their mind is good, later mix it with all kinds of evil, and from time to time give rise to the thought, ‘I seek the Buddha path, and dedicate all merits to unsurpassed awakening’; such people, over a long, long time, passing through immeasurable asaṃkhyeya kalpas, may arrive or may not arrive—because the causes and conditions of merit from former lives are thin, and moreover their faculties are dull and their minds not firm, like the one riding the sheep. Some people in former lives had a little merit and sharp faculties; after arousing the mind they gradually practise the six perfections, and passing through three, ten, or a hundred asaṃkhyeya kalpas they attain unsurpassed awakening, like the one riding the horse, who is sure to arrive. The third kind, riding supernormal power, is as said above. These three kinds of arousing the mind: the first has much sin and little merit, the second has much merit and little sin, the third practises only pure merit. The pure is further of two kinds: the first attains the bodhisattva path at the first arousing of the mind; the second stays for a while, makes offerings to the Buddhas of the ten directions, penetrates the bodhisattva path, and enters the bodhisattva stage, which is the ground of avaivartika. The meaning of ‘bodhisattva of the ground of avaivartika’ is as said before.
The next bodhisattva greatly wearies of the world; life after life he has always loved the true and loathed deceit; this bodhisattva too is of sharp faculties and firm mind and has long gathered immeasurable merit and wisdom; at the first arousing of the mind he at once attains unsurpassed awakening, at once turns the Dharma wheel, ferries immeasurable beings across, and enters nirvāṇa without remainder; his Dharma abides either for one kalpa or for less than one kalpa, and he leaves behind a transformation Buddha to ferry beings across. The Buddha has two kinds of supernormal power: the first at the present time, the second after his extinction. The meaning of ‘kalpa’ is as said above; the beings ferried across within one kalpa are also not few.
The next bodhisattva after that is also of sharp faculties and firm mind and has long gathered merit; on arousing the mind he is at once in accord with prajñā and attains the six supernormal powers, and together with immeasurable beings contemplates the pure worlds of the ten directions and adorns his own land. Just as when Amitābha Buddha, in a former life, was the bhikṣu Dharma Treasury, the Buddha led him everywhere through the ten directions and showed him the pure lands, enabling him to choose the pure and wondrous lands with which to adorn his own land.
往生品之上:畢竟空中,為何仍說菩薩有來有去
在問什麼
舍利弗的問題看似平常:修般若、與般若相應的菩薩,是從哪裡命終來、又往哪裡去。可是這一問正落在前面幾品的刀口上——前品才反覆說眾生畢竟不可得、菩薩但有名字而無實法,如今卻問『從何處來、去至何處』,豈不是自相矛盾?往生品之上的全部張力就在這裡:一邊是「無來無去」的畢竟空,一邊是佛廣說種種菩薩由何處受生、往何處成佛的『有來有去』。若把兩邊看成互相取消,這一品便無法成立;能不能在不動搖畢竟空的前提下,如實安立生死往來與修行進趣,正是這一分要回答的。
逐段解明
一、發問本身要先被安頓——二諦與四對根機。 論主不急著答菩薩從哪來,而先問舍利弗為什麼還能這樣問。答案是佛法有二諦:「為世諦」故說有眾生,「說眾生無所有」是為第一義諦。這不是兩套真理打對台,而是同一法的兩種說法場合。論更把受法的人分作四對來配這二諦:知不知名字相、初習與久習、著與不著、知不知他意——譬如「軍立密號」,同在一軍而有知號、不知號之別。對不知名字相、初習而執著、不知他意的人說「無眾生」,替他拔除實我;對知名字相、久習而不執著、知他意的人說「有眾生」,讓他不落斷滅。四對不是四種資格,而是同一句話對不同心地各說一半:說無、說有,都是應病。論又補一層:舍利弗以天眼見六道生死本無所疑,他真正不知道的,是那些從他方無量世界來、或往他方佛國去的大菩薩,天眼照不到,所以問;更因有小乘人憐憫又輕看久住生死的菩薩,舍利弗身為聲聞法將,要令眾生對菩薩生敬心,才代眾發問。發問於是不是懷疑空義,而是替眾生問一條路。
二、為何獨舉三處、不列惡道——一條判準三重不說。 佛答菩薩或從他方佛國、或從兜率天、或從人道來。論分別『為何不列惡道』時,給出一個貫穿全段的判準:從惡道來的,受苦因緣使心鈍,不堪按次第直趣佛道。縱有牛足比丘「五百世牛中生」、末後得人身而足猶似牛卻「得阿羅漢道」,又有摩偷婆尸他比丘五百世生獼猴中而證三明六神通,這等從畜生身出而得道的舊例,論也不諱——只是判其為「先世深種涅槃善根,小有謬錯」才墮惡道,「償罪既畢,涅槃善根熟」才成道果,數少不足為常法,故說惡道來者「不任次第得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心」。這判準再往上推,便有三重「不說」:天中所以獨舉兜率,是因下三天結使利而深、上二天結使深而不利,唯兜率「結使不深不利」而常有菩薩說法;色界諸天,得道者不復下、未得道者著禪味而不下,著味則智慧亦鈍,故不說;阿修羅同下二天,亦不說。三重不說的尺度始終是同一把——心能不能承接般若,不是出身的貴賤。
三、三處來者的根利根鈍,全繫於離不離佛。 同一判準落到三處:他方佛國來者從諸佛前來生,因除無量劫罪、遇佛隨心教導(「如刀得好石則利」)、常誦正憶念般若而諸根猛利;人中來者雖集諸功德、堪受般若,卻「以不見現在佛故心鈍」。經文特別點出他方來者「諸深法要皆現在前」,正是根利與常值諸佛的具體樣子。至於兜率何以「但說一生補處」不說二生三生,論答得妙:人身是罪結煩惱處,唯大菩薩處之不染,「如鵝入水,水不令濕」;佛自說其因緣是「不失六波羅蜜」、諸陀羅尼三昧門疾現在前,此菩薩應在此界利眾,其餘則分布十方,故獨舉一生補處。又何以「人中死人中生者,不如上二處」?論指出關要在身:「以人身地大多故,身重心鈍」,心心數法隨身強弱而轉。他方與兜率二處來者是法身菩薩變身無量以度眾生,人道中來者則皆是肉身——這也解了一疑:阿毘跋致菩薩不以結業受身,何以仍歸人道中說?答在「未捨肉身」四字:他來生此間得阿毘跋致而尚未捨肉身,故根鈍、三昧門不疾現前。分身之利鈍,不在地位高下,只在離佛近遠、捨身與否。
四、「常值諸佛」是這一分反覆迴響的主題句。 佛答後世時說,與般若相應的菩薩從一佛國至一佛國、常值諸佛、終不離佛。論解釋這不是空話:因「般若波羅蜜攝一切法」如大海無所不容,又因修念佛三昧等善法而生值諸佛,更因深入大悲、得無量福德而世世值佛。值佛不是果報的獎賞,而是不離般若之行自然的延伸——離佛則般若之緣易斷,值佛則相應之力相續。這也回應了發問時的隱憂:往生不是我這個實體在佛國之間搬移,而是相應之流不斷佛緣。
五、佛何以前世三答、後世卻廣分別。 論設一問:舍利弗前世後世並問,佛為何前世只三種答、後世反廣說?答有三層。其一,人以肉眼不見過去未來而生邪疑,然未來世終將受報,故須廣分別;譬如「已滅之火,不復求救」,卻要多方防範未生之火,治病亦然,已癒者不再治而專治將發之病——過去已定,未來可救,故詳於後。其二,佛辯才無量,少問而廣答,如貧者從「大富好施者乞」,所乞雖少而所與甚多。其三,般若中多說空法,有新發意者取著空相,於生死業因緣中生疑——『若一切法畢竟空,無來無去,云何死而有生』——為斷這一種著空之疑,佛才種種因緣廣說有死有生。這第三層要緊:後世之廣說,正是為對治『執空而撥無因果』這一顛倒,不是退回實有。
六、破斷滅見——不從玄理反駁,只舉可驗的事相。 有人主張人死如灰、如糞、如土,別無一物去受後身,不見故知無。論不與之爭玄,只列身邊可驗之事:小兒初生便「或啼或笑」,是先世習憂喜;「犢子生知趣乳」、猪羊生知牝牡、同胞子女而好醜貧富聰鈍各異,非先世因緣不能解釋。又破其『不見去者』之執:人身非獨眼能見,「六情各有所知」,可聞之法尚不可見,何況可知者;有生有死之法肉眼不見而天眼了了,如見人「從一房出,入一房」,捨此身至後身亦然——若肉眼便能見,何用求天眼。再正面立因果相續:雖無來去之實我,而煩惱不盡,身情意相續更生身情意,如「乳中著毒」,乳變酪、酪變酥,前者非後者而毒相續不失,此身亦「行業相續不異」而受後報;又如冬木未有花葉,一「得時節會,則次第而出」。論更疊舉五證:現世有知宿命者,如人疲極睡臥「覺已,憶所經由」;「一切聖人內外經書,皆說後世」;起不善法則「身則枯悴,顏色不悅」、生善法則心悅身軟「顏色和適」,既有苦樂善不善之驗,故知必有後世,如「藥師為王療病,王密為起宅」而藥師不知,歸見方悔;聖人說現在事實可信故說後世亦可信,如人「夜行嶮道,導師授手」,知可信則隨之。層層都不是思辨,而是把『死後有無』拉回可以印證的經驗與聖言。這一整段最深的一著,是把『無我』與『業不失』同時立住:斷滅見所以生,正因把「無來去者」誤讀成『一切斷滅』;論則指出無來去之實我與有相續之果報本不相礙——毒不是乳、酪、酥中任一實體,卻貫穿三者而不失,五眾亦無一物橫渡三世,而行業之勢相續受報。中觀於此不落常、不落斷:說常則有實我遷流,說斷則撥無因果,唯「相續不異」四字兩邊俱遮。這正是後文『畢竟空不遮往生』的地基——先在事相上立住不斷不常,空義才不致被誤解成斷滅。
七、畢竟空何以不遮往生——不斷不常。 論在此立一精確之語:佛法中「諸法畢竟空,而亦不斷滅」,「生死雖相續,亦不是常」,無量劫業因緣雖過去而能生果報不滅——這是微妙難知處。若諸法都空則不應說往生,若死生實有則不應說畢竟空;其實畢竟空只為除愛著邪見顛倒而說,「不為破後世故說」。論引《中論》之偈以顯此相,謂涅槃與世間之際皆真,「涅槃世無別,小異不可得」,是為畢竟空相——空而不遮生死業因緣,故說往生。執空者於空法中取相,反成新顛倒,論以「以刀斫空,終無所傷」點破:真無所著的人連空也不著,才不容兩邊之難。又答一疑:般若若一相無相,何以能與相應而常值諸佛?答般若攝一切法如海,且汝於無相中取相為難即已自違;更以「慈父見子為無所直物故死」一喻顯大悲——諸佛知法畢竟空而眾生不知、於空法中深著墮於大苦,故深入大悲、得無量福德而世世值佛。空與悲在此接榫:正因畢竟空,才有這無緣的大悲。
八、佛國之量、二種受生身。 論釋「佛國」之量:「十方如恒河沙等諸三千大千世界,是名一佛土」;諸佛神力雖普遍自在,所度眾生仍有分限。接著明二種菩薩身:一者隨業受生,二者得法性身變化自在生於三界。此下所說入禪不隨禪生的,論斷為「業因緣生身」——正因是業生,才須仗方便力不隨禪生,法身則變化自在不大須方便。這一分別是全段『有方便無方便』的根柢。
九、無方便墮長壽天、長壽天四釋、二十二根之鈍根。 無方便者入禪只著禪味、不念眾生,慈悲薄、功德少,被禪果牽生「長壽天」。長壽天論列四釋並存不判:一謂「非有想非無想處,壽八萬大劫」;一謂一切無色定通名長壽,無形不可化故不任得道;一謂無想天名長壽;一謂從初禪至四禪除淨居天皆名長壽,以著味邪見不受道。此處著味則善心難生,故經以甲頭土地土為喻——天上命終「還生人中者,如甲頭土」,墮地獄者如地土,反顯上生之難、著味之險。論又答一則細問:所謂鈍根,是「二十二根中何者是」?並列諸家:或謂慧根能觀諸法而以久著禪味故鈍;或謂信等五根助道而受報著味故鈍;或謂菩薩清淨福智故「十八根皆利」、「罪故則鈍」——如命根者「命根不為老、病、貧、窮等所惱」而安隱受樂為利,喜樂等五根了了覺知、受樂而知無常不生貪為利,信根牢堅難信能信為利,「男根淨者,得陰藏相」不著細滑知欲為過為利;又「三善根利,故名為利」,菩薩或於「三無漏根不證實際故利」,與利相違即鈍。這一長段訓根,是把『利鈍』從籠統的稱謂拆成一根一根可指的實義,並錄諸說而不強判一是。
十、第三、第四菩薩——捨禪之無方便與具足之方便。 第三菩薩既能捨禪,何以仍名無方便?論答:他命終時「入不善心,捨諸禪定方便」,或以欲界善心無記心捨禪、入慈悲念眾生而下生。「生欲界者,有十處」——四天下人與六欲天,而「三惡道,菩薩所不生」。第四菩薩才是真方便:入位得菩薩道,「修三十七品,能住十八空乃至大慈大悲」,以此方便力不隨禪、無量心、無色定而生,願生現在佛國續與般若相應。上二菩薩但有禪定直行六度,故無方便;第四菩薩以道品十八空慈悲為方便,這才把禪定從「著味」轉成『度生』的舟航。
十一、跋陀劫的全義——劫喻、四劫小劫、善劫之相。 論借「佛自說跋陀劫中菩薩」而詳釋劫義,這一長段須整段教明,不可略過。何謂劫?佛以喻解:方百由旬城溢滿芥子,長壽人百歲取一粒,「芥子都盡,劫猶不澌」;又方百由旬石,百歲以輕軟疊衣一拂,石盡而劫猶不澌。時之最短者「六十念中之一念」,最長者名劫。劫有大小:大劫如上喻,劫盡時眾生自然樂遠離、次第入四禪唱離五欲,三惡道亦得善心生人中,末後二日乃至七日出而三千界燒盡;又一說四大中三大動作故有火、水、風三劫,各壞至初禪、二禪、三禪之處。小劫亦三:外三大發故世界滅,內三毒發故眾生滅,即「飢餓、刀兵、疾病」;又一說時節歲數名小劫,如經說舍利弗作佛時「正法住世二十小劫,像法住世二十小劫」,眾小劫和合名大劫。「劫簸」者「秦言分別時節」,「跋陀」者秦言善——何以名善?有千萬劫過去空無有佛,而此一劫有千佛興世,淨居天歡喜故名善劫;淨居天何以預知?前劫盡已廓然都空,後有大水,水底涌出「千枚七寶光明蓮華,是千佛之相」,因是知之。這整段是本分義理最厚、最易被跳過的一節,教明之後,『此劫得菩提』一句才有分量。
十二、以方便還生欲界人天、作梵王。 此菩薩既捨禪,何以不生他方清淨世界而生欲界?論答諸菩薩行各不同,迴心生欲界正如於禪轉心生他方。順帶辨他方佛國之淨穢:雜惡不淨者即名欲界,清淨者則「無三惡道、三毒」乃至「亦無二乘之名,亦無女人」,「一切人皆有三十二相」、無量光明常照、一念作無量身度恒沙眾生——這樣的界在地上而非色界、無欲而非欲界、有形而非無色界,是大菩薩清淨業別得、出於三界者。至於生人中何以正生剎利等大家:「生剎利,為有勢力」、生婆羅門為有智慧、「生居士家,為大富故」,皆為能利眾生,貧則自不能利何能益人。生欲界諸天亦然:諸天著五欲難化,而菩薩方便力大,如三十三天上「須浮摩樹林」有聖天化度、兜率常有補處說法、「密迹金剛力士」在四天王天,皆隨處教化。生梵天作大梵王者,雖隨初禪生而不著味、念佛道憶本願,故是方便;何以必作梵王?以菩薩集福德大「世世常為物主」,乃至「生鹿中,亦為其王」,且本願要勸請諸佛轉法輪,不應作散天。
十三、三生補處菩薩何以仍修諸行、何以要生佛前。 三生菩薩已在十住地具足功德,何以還修四禪三昧諸行?論列四重:心未入涅槃要有所行;於天人中示行人法修道;雖在十住猶有煩惱習、於諸法猶有所不知;雖行深行而猶未取證。更以一喻收之:雖是大菩薩,於佛猶小,如大聚火雖能照而「於日則不現」,如《放鉢經》彌勒語文殊,設有恒沙文殊亦「不知我舉足下足事」——故雖十住猶應修行。又何以不廣度眾生而要生佛前?答其「所度已多」、垂欲成佛,且非但度生得成佛,「諸佛深法,應當聽聞」,故當在佛前。
十四、迦葉佛前的惡口、六年苦行、食馬麥——皆方便非實。 這是本分最重、也最須照論直說而不軟化的一節。有問:若為諮佛事而在佛前,何以釋迦文佛作菩薩時在迦葉佛前惡口毀呰?論答此是法身菩薩以變化身行人法,除諸重罪外飢渴憎愛讚呵皆現。其本事:釋迦文菩薩爾時為迦葉佛弟、「名欝多羅」,兄智熟不好多語、弟好論議而時人謂弟勝;兄後成佛號迦葉,弟為閻浮提王師,有五百弟子以婆羅門書教授而不好佛法。有陶師難提婆羅,是迦葉佛五戒弟子、已「得三道」,與欝多羅為善友。一日欝多羅乘金車「駕四白馬」出城,難提婆羅相迎報其兄已成佛、邀共覲佛;欝多羅恐弟子疑其為親屬愛而不隨、破其見佛因緣,遂住實相智入無上方便慧,口出惡言「此禿頭人,何能得菩提道」。難提婆羅為如瞋狀捉頭挽之曰「汝不得止」,欝多羅遂與師徒俱行詣佛,見光相心淨、聞法而得無量陀羅尼三昧門,五百弟子還發菩提心,欝多羅求出家佛言善來即成沙門。論斷曰:這是以方便故現惡言、非是實有;「虛空可破,水可作火,火可作水」,三生菩薩於凡夫尚不起瞋,何況於佛。——教到這裡須守住論意:惡口是度眾的方便權現,不是菩薩真起瞋。
十五、第八罪報與食馬麥,何以仍說——大小乘之異與方便之通。 承上更問:若惡口是方便,佛何以受第八罪報六年苦行?論答二因緣,皆非實罪。其一,小乘法與大乘法異,小乘多說斷結取涅槃、不說法身祕奧,故若佛不現受報,則諸天神仙龍鬼長壽者見有惡業而不受報,將謂無業報因緣,故雖無惡業而示現受報。其二有今世因緣:外道信著苦行,佛若不苦行,人將謂王子串樂不能苦行,而外道苦行至極不過三月半歲一歲,無能「日食一麻一米」六年者,故佛六年苦行令其信入正道。既皆方便,何以知非實罪?以諸佛「斷一切不善法、成就一切善法」,若實受罪報則此語不成。論又以食馬麥一事印證方便:釋迦文佛於毘婆尸佛時作大婆羅門,見佛眾僧食而發惡言「如是人輩,應食馬麥」,因此墮黑繩地獄受無量苦,餘罪雖成佛道「而三月食馬麥」——然聲聞法自說佛過三阿僧祇劫「常識宿命,常不墮三惡道中」,從毘婆尸佛來九十一劫,依其自法九十劫不應墮惡道、何況末後一劫,故知食馬麥亦方便說。有難者謂「百劫不墮惡道」乃阿毘曇鞞婆沙論議師說、非佛語,論答阿毘曇本是佛說、隨之論議為鞞婆沙不應有錯,又如薄拘盧「以一訶梨勒果施僧」九十一劫不墮惡道,何況菩薩無量世布施而以小罪墮獄。更以初生七步為證:菩薩初生行七步自說「我所以生者,為度眾生故」,乳哺三年不行不語,一切嬰孩本漸長乃能行語、豈有初生能而後反不能者,可知是方便力;受此方便則一切佛語皆通,不受則成「一實一虛」。這一節的骨眼始終是一句:佛菩薩的受罪報之相,是為小心眾生、為顯業報不虛而權現,不是佛實有可墮之罪。
十六、何以生兜率不生餘處——太子登位之喻。 三生菩薩何以但生兜率?論列諸不可:他方來則諸天龍鬼求其來處不知而疑為幻化;人中死人中生然後作佛則人起輕慢、天不信,法應天化人不應人化天;無色界無形不能說法;色界深著禪味不能大利眾生;下三欲天結使厚而麁心錯亂、上二天結使厚而心軟不利——唯「兜率天上,結使薄,心軟利」,常是菩薩住處。譬如太子將登王位「先於靜室七日齋潔」然後受位,補處菩薩亦以兜率如齋處,末後受天樂、壽終下生末後受人樂便成正覺。無量諸天何以「咸皆侍送」?以此是末後天身不復更來生天,故諸天送別、發願下生為菩薩檀越,又欲常侍衛菩薩以防「百億魔怨」惱亂。
十七、六神通菩薩——生身法身之別、遊戲神通所至。 論釋此段標出二種菩薩之神通分位:法身菩薩「斷結使,得六神通」,生身菩薩「不斷結使,或離欲得五神通」。得六神通者不生三界、遊諸世界供養十方佛;遊戲神通者到十方度眾生雨七寶、所至皆一乘清淨壽命無量。又問:菩薩應度眾生,何以但至清淨無量壽世界?論分二種菩薩:一者「有慈悲心,多為眾生」,故至無佛法處讚三寶之音;二者「多集諸佛功德」,故至一乘清淨無量壽世界。二者非有優劣,只是願之所偏,各成其行。
十八、三種初發意菩薩——三喻與即位不疑。 論以乘羊、乘馬、乘神通三喻收束:罪多福少者如乘羊久久或到或不到,福多罪少者如乘馬必有所到,但行清淨福德者如乘神通發意頃便到。三喻不為分等級,而是說明『初發意即得阿鞞跋致』並非跳階,而是宿世久集福德、利根心堅、又從佛聞法的自然結果——正如神通之相,不應疑其「發意間云何得到」。三種發心之外,論又別出二菩薩:一者初發心即得菩提、轉法輪度眾、入無餘涅槃而「留化佛度眾生」,其法住一劫或減一劫、所度不少;一者發心即與般若相應、得六神通,與無量眾生共觀十方淨土而自莊嚴其國。之上即以阿彌陀佛先世為法藏比丘、蒙佛導遍十方選取淨國作結,把前面的往生、值佛、方便、進趣,收攏到一個具體的願——淨佛世界。
不要讀錯
不要把『往生品說有來去』讀成佛退回了實我。全分的每一處「有」,背後都壓著一句『無所得』:說有眾生是世諦門,說眾生無所有是第一義門,兩門同時成立才是二諦。也不要把「常值諸佛」讀成一種好運或福利;它是不離般若、深入大悲的必然伴隨,一旦離佛、斷般若之緣,值佛之相即失。更不要把兩種菩薩、有無方便讀成資格審查——論分業生與法性身、有方便與無方便,是要人看清自己此刻靠的是禪味還是慈悲、是取相還是相應,而不是急著自認屬於哪一等。畢竟空不遮往生,反過來,往生也從不動搖畢竟空。
最要緊的一處,是讀迦葉佛前惡口、六年苦行、食馬麥這幾段本事時,切不可把它讀成佛菩薩真有可墮之罪、真起過瞋心。論的斷語一路明白:欝多羅的惡言是「住諸法實相智中,入無上方便慧」而權現,「非是實也」,三生菩薩於凡夫尚不起瞋、何況於佛;六年苦行與食馬麥是為長壽天神不見業報者、為信著苦行的外道、為小心眾生而示現受報,「非實罪也」,以諸佛「斷一切不善法、成就一切善法」,若實受罪則此語不成。這些段落是本論教「方便」義的正面教材,讀者的本分是如實傳其所說的因緣與判語,既不替菩薩諱其惡口之相、也不把示現之報坐實成真罪——論怎麼說,便怎麼領。至於古來大小乘於此的往復問難,論已並錄其詞、標明其為方便,此處亦只誌其問答,不別判是非。
修行作用
之上可作一面照心的鏡子。修定時可問:我是在著禪味,還是念佛道、入慈心,讓禪與悲智和合?遇順逆生死時可問:我是把它當實我的流轉而生斷常之見,還是看作因緣相續、業報不失而不取一物?發心求進時可問:我是在比昨日更高處自得,還是老實久集福德、不離般若與眾生?三問若答得住,便是在「無來去」中真能「往生」——不動空義,而念念不離佛、不離眾生。
承衍
後來古德讀這一分,最先被取用的正是開篇二諦一段。有判教者以本品『有菩薩往生』與前品『無菩薩』對觀,判為凡聖二諦、彼此不相違,並把它與中觀『畢竟空不遮生死』的論法繫在一處;也有依此段問答架構,列出具說二諦、但說第一義、但說世諦三種說法之型。這些讀法各有其脈絡,此處只誌其取徑、不判其高下。把它們帶回本品,最值得保留的不是一張更細的往生分類表,而是這一分對「來去」的改寫:真正的往生,不是一個實我在佛國之間遷移,而是願與般若相續不斷佛緣;每一次受生,都不是為自己換一個更好的去處,而是為不離眾生、不離佛而受生。之上之末以法藏比丘選取淨國作結,恰好把『從何處來、往何處去』這一問,交還給一個可反覆自省的願——我此生所趣,是否仍向一切智與一切眾生。
Rebirth, First Part: Within Ultimate Emptiness, Why Is It Still Said That the Bodhisattva Comes and Goes?
What Is Being Asked
Śāriputra’s question looks ordinary: a bodhisattva who practises prajñā and is in accord with prajñā—from where does he come when his life ends, and to where does he go? Yet this question lands right on the blade’s edge of the preceding chapters—the chapter before has only just said again and again that beings are ultimately unfindable and that a bodhisattva has only a name and no real dharma, and now it is asked ‘from where does he come, and to where does he go’—is this not self-contradictory? The whole tension of the First Part of the chapter on rebirth lies right here: on one side, the ultimate emptiness of “neither coming nor going”; on the other, the Buddha’s wide-ranging account of the ‘coming and going’ of every kind of bodhisattva—from where he takes birth, and to where he goes to become a buddha. If the two sides are seen as cancelling each other out, this chapter cannot stand; whether it is possible, without shaking ultimate emptiness, to establish truly the coming and going of birth and death and the advance of practice—this is precisely what this part sets out to answer.
Passage by Passage
1. The question itself must first be settled—the two truths and four pairs of capacities. The treatise-author is in no hurry to answer where the bodhisattva comes from; he first asks why Śāriputra is still able to ask this at all. The answer is that the Buddha’s Dharma has two truths: “for the sake of worldly truth” it is said that there are beings, and “saying that beings have no existence” is for the sake of the truth of the highest meaning. This is not two sets of truth set against each other, but two occasions of speaking for one and the same Dharma. The treatise further divides those who receive the Dharma into four pairs to match these two truths: those who know and those who do not know the marks of names; those who have trained briefly and those who have trained long; those who are attached and those who are not attached; those who know and those who do not know the speaker’s intent—like “an army setting a secret password,” where within one and the same army some know the password and some do not. To those who do not know the marks of names, who are beginners and attached, and who do not know the speaker’s intent, it is said that “there are no beings,” to pull out their real self for them; to those who know the marks of names, who have trained long and are not attached, and who know the speaker’s intent, it is said that “there are beings,” so that they do not fall into annihilation. The four pairs are not four kinds of qualification, but one and the same saying told half to each of different grounds of mind: saying “there are none” and saying “there are” are both medicine suited to the illness. The treatise adds one more layer: with his divine eye Śāriputra sees the birth and death of the six destinies and has no doubt about them at all; what he truly does not know are the great bodhisattvas who come from immeasurable worlds in other directions or go to buddha-lands in other directions—these his divine eye cannot reach, and so he asks; and further, because there are people of the Small Vehicle who both pity and look down on bodhisattvas who dwell long in birth and death, Śāriputra, as a Dharma-general of the śrāvakas, wishes to make beings give rise to a mind of reverence toward bodhisattvas, and so he asks on behalf of the assembly. The asking, then, is not doubt about the meaning of emptiness, but asking about a road on behalf of beings.
2. Why only three places are named and the evil destinies are not listed—one criterion and three levels of “not speaking.” The Buddha answers that a bodhisattva comes either from a buddha-land in another direction, or from the Tuṣita Heaven, or from the human destiny. Where the treatise distinguishes ‘why the evil destinies are not listed,’ it gives a criterion that runs through the whole passage: for those who come from the evil destinies, the causes and conditions of suffering make the mind dull, and it cannot bear to head straight for the Buddha-path in due sequence. Even though there is the bhikṣu Ox-foot, who was “born among oxen for five hundred lives” and, when at last he obtained a human body, still had feet like an ox’s and yet “attained the path of the arhat,” and again the bhikṣu Motouposhita, who was born among monkeys for five hundred lives and realised the three clarities and six supernormal powers—such old precedents of attaining the path after coming out of an animal body the treatise does not conceal either—it only judges that they had 「先世深種涅槃善根,小有謬錯」 tr. "in former lives deeply planted roots of goodness for nirvāṇa, with a slight error," and so fell into the evil destinies, and that 「償罪既畢,涅槃善根熟」 tr. "once the repayment of the offence was finished, the roots of goodness for nirvāṇa ripened," and only then did they attain the fruit of the path; such cases are few and do not suffice as a standing rule, and so it says that those who come from the evil destinies 「不任次第得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心」 tr. "are not fit to attain in due sequence the mind of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi." Pushed further upward, this criterion yields three levels of “not speaking”: among the heavens only Tuṣita is named, because in the three lower heavens the fetters are sharp and deep, and in the two upper heavens the fetters are deep but not sharp, while Tuṣita alone has 「結使不深不利」 tr. "fetters neither deep nor sharp," and there are always bodhisattvas teaching the Dharma there; among the gods of the form realm, those who have attained the path do not come down again, and those who have not attained the path are attached to the flavour of meditation and do not come down, and being attached to flavour their wisdom too is dull, so they are not spoken of; the asuras are the same as the two lower heavens, and they too are not spoken of. The measure of the three levels of not speaking is always one and the same rule—whether the mind can receive prajñā, not whether one’s origin is noble or base.
3. Whether those who come from the three places have sharp or dull faculties depends entirely on whether they are apart from the Buddha or not. The same criterion falls upon the three places: those who come from a buddha-land in another direction come to birth from the presence of the buddhas, and because the offences of immeasurable kalpas have been removed, because they meet a buddha who teaches and guides them according to their minds (“as a knife that finds a good whetstone becomes sharp”), and because they constantly recite and rightly recollect prajñā, their faculties are fierce and sharp; those who come from among humans, though they have gathered every kind of merit and are fit to receive prajñā, are nonetheless 「以不見現在佛故心鈍」 tr. "dull of mind because they do not see a present buddha." The sūtra text specially points out that for those who come from other directions “all the deep essentials of the Dharma appear before them,” and this is precisely the concrete form of sharp faculties and constantly meeting the buddhas. As for why of Tuṣita it “speaks only of the one-birth successor” and does not speak of two births or three, the treatise’s answer is fine: the human body is a place of offences, bonds and afflictions, and only a great bodhisattva can dwell in it without being stained, 「如鵝入水,水不令濕」 tr. "as a goose enters the water, and the water does not make it wet"; the Buddha himself states the cause and condition of this as “not losing the six perfections,” with all the gates of dhāraṇī and samādhi swiftly appearing before him; this bodhisattva ought to benefit beings in this world, while the others are distributed through the ten directions, and so only the one-birth successor is named. And why is it that “one who dies among humans and is born among humans is not equal to the two places above”? The treatise points out that the crux lies in the body: 「以人身地大多故,身重心鈍」 tr. "because in the human body the earth element is abundant, the body is heavy and the mind dull"; mind and mental factors turn according to the strength or weakness of the body. Those who come from the two places, other directions and Tuṣita, are dharma-body bodhisattvas who transform their bodies without measure to liberate beings, whereas those who come from within the human destiny all have bodies of flesh—and this also resolves a doubt: an avaivartika bodhisattva does not receive a body through the karma of the bonds, so why is he still spoken of under the human destiny? The answer lies in the four characters 「未捨肉身」 tr. "has not yet relinquished the body of flesh": having come from elsewhere and been born here, he attains the avaivartika stage but has not yet relinquished the body of flesh, and so his faculties are dull and the gates of samādhi do not swiftly appear before him. The sharpness or dullness of the division lies not in whether one’s stage is high or low, but only in whether one is near to or far from the Buddha, and whether one has relinquished the body or not.
4. “Constantly meeting the buddhas” is the theme sentence that echoes again and again through this part. Answering about later lives, the Buddha says that a bodhisattva in accord with prajñā goes from one buddha-land to another buddha-land, constantly meets the buddhas, and never departs from the Buddha. The treatise explains that this is not empty talk: because 「般若波羅蜜攝一切法」 tr. "the prajñāpāramitā gathers in all dharmas," like the great ocean that has nothing it does not contain; again, because he cultivates the samādhi of recollecting the Buddha and other wholesome dharmas, he is born where he meets the buddhas; and further, because he deeply enters great compassion and gains immeasurable merit, he meets the Buddha life after life. Meeting the Buddha is not a reward handed out as recompense, but the natural extension of the practice that does not depart from prajñā—apart from the Buddha, the condition of prajñā is easily cut off; meeting the Buddha, the power of accord continues. This also answers the hidden worry at the time of the question: rebirth is not this real entity that is ‘I’ moving house between buddha-lands, but a stream of accord that does not cut off the condition of the Buddha.
5. Why the Buddha gives three answers about former lives but distinguishes at length about later lives. The treatise sets up a question: Śāriputra asked about former lives and later lives together—why did the Buddha give only three kinds of answer about former lives, yet on the contrary speak at length about later lives? The answer has three layers. First, people with the eye of flesh do not see past and future and give rise to wrong doubts, yet in the future world they will in the end receive recompense, so it must be distinguished at length; as, “with a fire already put out, one no longer seeks rescue,” yet one must guard in many ways against a fire not yet arisen, and healing illness is the same: one who has already recovered is no longer treated, and treatment is concentrated on the illness about to break out—the past is already fixed, the future can still be rescued, and so the account is detailed about what comes after. Second, the Buddha’s eloquence is measureless; asked a little, he answers widely, as when a poor man begs from “a very rich man fond of giving”—what is begged is little, but what is given is very much. Third, prajñā speaks much of the dharma of emptiness, and there are those newly setting their minds who grasp at the mark of emptiness and give rise to doubt about the causes and conditions of the karma of birth and death—‘if all dharmas are ultimately empty, without coming or going, how is it that one dies and there is birth?’—it is to cut off this one kind of doubt of those attached to emptiness that the Buddha speaks at length, with every kind of cause and condition, of there being death and there being birth. This third layer is crucial: the wide account of later lives is precisely to counteract the inversion of ‘clinging to emptiness and denying cause and effect,’ not a retreat into real existence.
6. Refuting the view of annihilation—not by rebutting with abstruse principle, but by citing verifiable matters and marks. There are those who maintain that a person at death is like ashes, like dung, like earth, with no further thing at all that goes on to receive a later body—not seeing it, they know it is not there. The treatise does not contend with them over the abstruse; it only lists verifiable matters close at hand: a small child just born will “now cry, now laugh,” which is the habit of sorrow and joy from former lives; “a calf at birth knows to go for the milk,” pigs and sheep at birth know male and female, and children born of the same womb differ in looks, wealth, and intelligence—none of which can be explained except by causes and conditions from former lives. It further refutes their fixation on ‘not seeing the one who goes’: the human body is not seen by the eye alone—“each of the six sense-faculties has what it knows”; dharmas that can be heard still cannot be seen, how much less dharmas that can be known; the dharma of there being birth and there being death is not seen by the eye of flesh but is seen clearly by the divine eye, as one sees a person “come out of one room and enter another room”—abandoning this body and arriving at the later body is likewise—if the eye of flesh could see it, what need would there be to seek the divine eye? Then it positively establishes the continuity of cause and effect: though there is no real self that comes and goes, yet while the afflictions are not exhausted, body, faculties and mind continue and give rise again to body, faculties and mind, as with “poison put into milk”: milk turns into curds and curds into butter, the earlier is not the later, yet the poison continues and is not lost; this body too is 「行業相續不異」 tr. "a continuity of actions and karma, not different," and receives later recompense; again, as a tree in winter has no flowers or leaves yet, but once it “meets the right season, they come forth in due order.” The treatise further piles up five proofs: in the present world there are those who know their past lives, as a person exhausted and fallen asleep, “having woken, remembers what he passed through”; 「一切聖人內外經書,皆說後世」 tr. "the scriptures of all sages, inner and outer, all speak of later lives"; when one gives rise to unwholesome dharmas “the body then withers and the complexion is unhappy,” and when one gives rise to wholesome dharmas the mind is glad, the body supple and “the complexion harmonious and at ease”—since there is this evidence of suffering and joy, wholesome and unwholesome, it is known that there must be later lives, as when “a physician treats the king’s illness, and the king secretly has a house built for him” while the physician does not know, and on returning and seeing it he regrets; the sages speak truly and credibly of present matters, so what they say of later lives is also credible, as when a person “walking a perilous road at night has a guide give him a hand”—knowing him credible, he follows. Layer upon layer, none of it is speculation; it all pulls ‘whether there is anything after death’ back to experience and holy words that can be verified. The deepest move in this whole passage is to establish at the same time both ‘no-self’ and ‘karma is not lost’: the view of annihilation arises precisely because “there is no one who comes and goes” is misread as ‘everything is annihilated’; the treatise points out that there being no real self that comes and goes and there being continuous fruits of recompense do not obstruct each other in the first place—the poison is not any real entity among milk, curds and butter, yet it runs through all three and is not lost; the five aggregates likewise have no single thing that crosses the three times, yet the momentum of actions and karma continues and receives recompense. Here the Middle Way falls neither into permanence nor into annihilation: to speak of permanence is to have a real self that migrates; to speak of annihilation is to deny cause and effect; only the four characters 「相續不異」 tr. "continuous, not different" screen off both sides at once. This is exactly the foundation of the later ‘ultimate emptiness does not screen off rebirth’—only when non-annihilation and non-permanence are first established in matters and marks will the meaning of emptiness not be misunderstood as annihilation.
7. Why ultimate emptiness does not screen off rebirth—neither annihilation nor permanence. Here the treatise sets down precise words: in the Buddha’s Dharma, 「諸法畢竟空,而亦不斷滅」 tr. "all dharmas are ultimately empty, and yet they are not annihilated"; 「生死雖相續,亦不是常」 tr. "though birth and death continue, they are not permanent either"; though the causes and conditions of the karma of immeasurable kalpas are past, they can give rise to fruits of recompense and are not extinguished—this is the subtle place, hard to know. If all dharmas were simply empty, rebirth ought not to be spoken of; if death and birth were really existent, ultimate emptiness ought not to be spoken of; in fact ultimate emptiness is spoken only to remove craving, attachment, wrong views and inversions, and is 「不為破後世故說」 tr. "not spoken in order to demolish later lives." The treatise cites a verse of the Middle Treatise to reveal this mark, saying that the limit of nirvāṇa and the limit of the world are both true: 「涅槃世無別,小異不可得」 tr. "nirvāṇa and the world have no distinction; not the slightest difference can be found"—this is the mark of ultimate emptiness: empty, yet not screening off the causes and conditions of the karma of birth and death, and so rebirth is spoken of. One who clings to emptiness grasps a mark within the dharma of emptiness and on the contrary produces a new inversion; the treatise exposes this with 「以刀斫空,終無所傷」 tr. "hacking at empty space with a knife, in the end nothing is wounded": a person who is truly without attachment is not attached even to emptiness, and only then does he not admit the difficulties of the two sides. It also answers a doubt: if prajñā is of one mark, which is no mark, how can one be in accord with it and constantly meet the buddhas? The answer is that prajñā gathers in all dharmas like the ocean, and moreover, your raising a difficulty by grasping a mark within the signless already contradicts itself; and it further reveals great compassion with a simile, “a loving father seeing his son die for the sake of a worthless thing”—the buddhas know that dharmas are ultimately empty, but beings do not know it, and, deeply attached within the dharma of emptiness, fall into great suffering; therefore the bodhisattva deeply enters great compassion, gains immeasurable merit, and meets the Buddha life after life. Here emptiness and compassion are joined: precisely because of ultimate emptiness there is this great compassion without object.
8. The measure of a buddha-land; the two kinds of body by which one receives birth. The treatise explains the measure of a “buddha-land”: 「十方如恒河沙等諸三千大千世界,是名一佛土」 tr. "the three-thousand great-thousand worlds of the ten directions, as many as the sands of the Ganges—this is called one buddha-land"; though the spiritual power of the buddhas pervades everywhere freely, the beings they liberate still have their limits. Next it makes clear the two kinds of bodhisattva body: the first receives birth according to karma; the second has attained the body of dharma-nature and is born into the three realms by free transformation. The one spoken of below, who enters meditation but is not born according to that meditation, the treatise judges to be 「業因緣生身」 tr. "a body born of the causes and conditions of karma"—precisely because it is born of karma, it must rely on the power of skilful means not to be born according to meditation, whereas the dharma-body transforms freely and has little need of skilful means. This distinction is the root of the whole passage on ‘having skilful means and lacking skilful means.’
9. Lacking skilful means and falling into the heavens of long life; four explanations of the heavens of long life; the dull faculties among the twenty-two faculties. One who lacks skilful means, on entering meditation, is attached only to the flavour of meditation and does not keep beings in mind; his kindness and compassion are thin and his merit little, and he is drawn by the fruit of meditation to be born among “the heavens of long life.” For the heavens of long life the treatise lists four explanations side by side without judging between them: one says it is 「非有想非無想處,壽八萬大劫」 tr. "the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception, with a lifespan of eighty thousand great kalpas"; one says all the formless concentrations are in common called long life, because being formless they cannot be converted and so are not fit to attain the path; one says the heaven without perception is called long life; one says that from the first meditation to the fourth meditation, excepting the heavens of the Pure Abodes, all are called long life, because with attachment to flavour and wrong views they do not receive the path. In such places, being attached to flavour, a wholesome mind is hard to give rise to, and so the sūtra uses the simile of the earth on a fingernail and the earth of the ground—of those whose lives end in the heavens, “those who are born again among humans are like the earth on a fingernail,” and those who fall into the hells are like the earth of the ground, which shows by contrast how hard it is to be born upward and how dangerous attachment to flavour is. The treatise further answers a fine question: what are called dull faculties—“which among the twenty-two faculties are these?” It sets the various masters side by side: some say it is the faculty of wisdom, which can contemplate all dharmas but is dulled by long attachment to the flavour of meditation; some say it is the five faculties of faith and the rest, which assist the path but are dulled because in receiving recompense one is attached to flavour; some say that because a bodhisattva’s merit and wisdom are pure, 「十八根皆利」 tr. "all eighteen faculties are sharp," and 「罪故則鈍」 tr. "because of offences, they are dull"—for example, of the life faculty, “the life faculty is not troubled by old age, illness, poverty, want and the like,” and to be at ease and receive happiness is sharpness; the five faculties of joy, pleasure and the rest are sharp when they perceive clearly, and receiving pleasure yet knowing it is impermanent do not give rise to greed; the faculty of faith is sharp when it is firm and can believe what is hard to believe; “one whose male faculty is pure attains the mark of the sheathed organ,” and is sharp in not being attached to smoothness and knowing desire to be a fault; further, “the three wholesome roots are sharp, and therefore are called sharp,” and the bodhisattva is sometimes sharp in 「三無漏根不證實際故利」 tr. "the three undefiled faculties: they are sharp because he does not realise the limit of reality"; what runs contrary to sharpness is dullness. This long passage glossing the faculties takes ‘sharp and dull’ apart from a vague appellation into real meanings that can be pointed to one faculty at a time, and records the various accounts side by side without forcing a judgement on which one is right.
10. The third and fourth bodhisattvas—the lack of skilful means in relinquishing meditation, and the skilful means that is complete. Since the third bodhisattva can relinquish meditation, why is he still called lacking skilful means? The treatise answers: at the end of his life he 「入不善心,捨諸禪定方便」 tr. "enters an unwholesome mind and relinquishes the skilful means of the meditations and concentrations," or relinquishes meditation with a wholesome mind of the desire realm or a neutral mind, and enters kindness and compassion, keeping beings in mind, and so is born downward. “For those born in the desire realm there are ten places”—the humans of the four continents and the six heavens of desire—while “the three evil destinies are where a bodhisattva is not born.” Only the fourth bodhisattva has true skilful means: entering the stage, he attains the bodhisattva path, 「修三十七品,能住十八空乃至大慈大悲」 tr. "cultivates the thirty-seven limbs of the path and is able to abide in the eighteen emptinesses, up to great kindness and great compassion," and by this power of skilful means is not born according to the meditations, the immeasurable minds, or the formless concentrations, but vows to be born in a buddha-land where a buddha is now present and to continue in accord with prajñā. The two bodhisattvas above have only meditation and concentration and practise the six perfections directly, and so they lack skilful means; the fourth bodhisattva takes the limbs of the path, the eighteen emptinesses, kindness and compassion as his skilful means, and only this turns meditation and concentration from “attachment to flavour” into a boat for ‘liberating beings.’
11. The full meaning of the Bhadrakalpa—the similes of the kalpa, four kinds of kalpa and small kalpas, the mark of the good kalpa. Taking up “the Buddha himself speaking of the bodhisattvas in the Bhadrakalpa,” the treatise explains the meaning of the kalpa in detail; this long passage must be taught as a whole passage and may not be skipped over. What is a kalpa? The Buddha explains it by simile: a city a hundred yojanas square is filled to overflowing with mustard seeds, and a long-lived person takes one seed every hundred years; 「芥子都盡,劫猶不澌」 tr. "when the mustard seeds are all gone, the kalpa is still not exhausted"; again, a stone a hundred yojanas square is brushed once every hundred years with light, soft cotton cloth, and when the stone is gone the kalpa is still not exhausted. The shortest of times is “one thought among sixty thoughts,” and the longest is called a kalpa. Kalpas are great and small: the great kalpa is as in the similes above; when the kalpa comes to its end, beings naturally delight in withdrawal and enter the four meditations in order, proclaiming the abandonment of the five desires, and those in the three evil destinies too gain a wholesome mind and are born among humans; at the last two suns and up to seven suns come out, and the three-thousand world is burnt up; again, one account says that because three of the four great elements become active there are the three kalpas of fire, water, and wind, which destroy up to the places of the first meditation, the second meditation, and the third meditation respectively. The small kalpas are also three: when the outer three great elements break out, the world perishes; when the inner three poisons break out, beings perish—that is, “famine, sword and war, and pestilence”; again, one account says that seasons and the count of years are called small kalpas, as the sūtra says that when Śāriputra becomes a buddha “the true Dharma will abide in the world for twenty small kalpas, and the semblance Dharma will abide in the world for twenty small kalpas,” and many small kalpas joined together are called a great kalpa. Kalpa means “in the language of Qin, distinguishing seasons”; bhadra in the language of Qin means good—why is it named good? For thousands of myriads of kalpas in the past there were empty kalpas with no buddha, yet in this one kalpa a thousand buddhas arise in the world, and the gods of the Pure Abodes rejoice, and so it is named the good kalpa; how did the gods of the Pure Abodes know in advance? When the previous kalpa had ended, all was vast and utterly empty; afterwards there was a great water, and from the bottom of the water there welled up 「千枚七寶光明蓮華,是千佛之相」 tr. "a thousand shining lotus flowers of the seven jewels—the sign of the thousand buddhas," and from this they knew it. This whole passage is the section of this part thickest in doctrinal meaning and the most easily skipped; only once it has been taught does the phrase ‘attains awakening in this kalpa’ carry its weight.
12. By skilful means he is born again among humans and gods of the desire realm, and becomes the Brahmā king. Since this bodhisattva has relinquished meditation, why is he not born in a pure world of another direction but born in the desire realm? The treatise answers that the practices of bodhisattvas each differ; turning the mind to be born in the desire realm is just like turning the mind from meditation to be born in another direction. In passing it distinguishes the purity and impurity of the buddha-lands of other directions: one that is mixed with evil and impure is called the desire realm, while in a pure one there are “no three evil destinies and no three poisons,” up to 「亦無二乘之名,亦無女人」 tr. "there is not even the name of the two vehicles, and there are no women either"; “all people have the thirty-two marks,” immeasurable light shines constantly, and in a single thought one makes immeasurable bodies to liberate beings as many as the Ganges’ sands—such a realm is on the ground and so is not the form realm, is without desire and so is not the desire realm, has form and so is not the formless realm; it is obtained separately by the pure karma of great bodhisattvas and lies beyond the three realms. As for why, when born among humans, he is born precisely into great families such as the kṣatriyas: “he is born a kṣatriya in order to have power,” he is born a brahmin in order to have wisdom, “he is born into a householder’s family in order to be greatly rich”—all in order to be able to benefit beings; if poor, he cannot benefit even himself, so how could he help others? Being born among the gods of the desire realm is likewise: the gods are attached to the five desires and hard to convert, but the bodhisattva’s power of skilful means is great, as in the Heaven of the Thirty-three there is “the Xufumo grove” where holy gods convert and liberate, in Tuṣita there is always the successor teaching the Dharma, and “the Vajra Strongman of Secret Traces” is in the Heaven of the Four Heavenly Kings—all teaching and converting wherever they are. One who is born in the Brahmā heaven and becomes the Great Brahmā king, though he is born according to the first meditation, is not attached to its flavour, keeps the Buddha-path in mind and recollects his original vow, and so this is skilful means; why must he become the Brahmā king? Because the merit a bodhisattva gathers is great, he “in every life is always the lord of creatures,” even “when born among deer, he is their king too”; and his original vow is to entreat the buddhas to turn the wheel of the Dharma, so he ought not to be a scattered, ordinary god.
13. Why the bodhisattva of three births to succession still cultivates all the practices, and why he must be born in the presence of a buddha. The bodhisattva of three births has already completed his merit on the ten abodes—why does he still cultivate the four meditations, samādhi and the other practices? The treatise lists four layers: his mind has not entered nirvāṇa, so he must have something to practise; among gods and humans he displays practising the path in the manner of human practice; though on the ten abodes, he still has the residual habits of the afflictions, and still has something he does not know of all dharmas; though he practises deep practices, he has not yet taken realisation. It gathers these up further with a simile: though a great bodhisattva, in comparison with the Buddha he is still small, as a great heap of fire, though it can illuminate, “before the sun does not appear”; as in the Sūtra of Setting Down the Bowl, where Maitreya says to Mañjuśrī that even if there were Mañjuśrīs as many as the Ganges’ sands, they would “not know the matter of my lifting my foot and setting down my foot”—therefore, though on the ten abodes, he should still cultivate practice. And why does he not liberate beings widely but must be born in the presence of a buddha? The answer is that “those he has liberated are already many” and he is about to become a buddha; moreover, it is not only by liberating beings that one becomes a buddha: “the deep Dharma of the buddhas ought to be heard,” and so he should be in the presence of a buddha.
14. The harsh speech before Kāśyapa Buddha, the six years of austerities, the eating of horse-barley—all skilful means, not real. This is the weightiest section of this part, and also the one that most requires speaking straight according to the treatise without softening it. There is a question: if one is in the presence of a buddha in order to consult the Buddha on matters, why was it that the Buddha Śākyamuni, when he was a bodhisattva, abused and disparaged Kāśyapa Buddha to his face with harsh speech? The treatise answers that this is a dharma-body bodhisattva who, by a body of transformation, acts in the manner of humans; apart from the grave offences, hunger and thirst, hatred and love, praise and blame all appear. The story: the bodhisattva Śākyamuni was at that time Kāśyapa Buddha’s younger brother, “named Uttara”; the elder brother was mature in wisdom and did not like much talk, while the younger brother liked debate, and the people of the time said the younger brother was superior; the elder brother later became a buddha named Kāśyapa, while the younger brother became the teacher of the king of Jambudvīpa, with five hundred disciples whom he taught with the books of the brahmins, and he did not like the Buddha’s Dharma. There was a potter, Nandipāla, a five-precept disciple of Kāśyapa Buddha, who had already “attained the three paths,” and was a good friend of Uttara. One day Uttara rode out of the city in a golden carriage “drawn by four white horses,” and Nandipāla came to meet him and told him that his elder brother had already become a buddha, inviting him to go together to see the Buddha; Uttara, fearing that his disciples would suspect him of acting out of love for a kinsman and would not follow, destroying their conditions for seeing the Buddha, therefore abode in the knowledge of the real mark, entered unsurpassed wisdom of skilful means, and uttered harsh words: 「此禿頭人,何能得菩提道」 tr. "this bald-headed man—how could he attain the path of awakening?" Nandipāla, putting on an appearance of anger, seized him by the head and pulled him, saying, “you may not stop”; Uttara then went together with his disciples to the Buddha, saw his radiant marks, and his mind became pure; hearing the Dharma, he attained immeasurable gates of dhāraṇī and samādhi, the five hundred disciples in turn aroused the mind of awakening, and Uttara asked to leave home; the Buddha said “welcome,” and at once he became a śramaṇa. The treatise judges: this was harsh speech displayed by skilful means, not something real; 「虛空可破,水可作火,火可作水」 tr. "empty space can be broken, water can be made into fire, fire can be made into water"—a bodhisattva of three births does not give rise to anger even toward ordinary people, how much less toward a buddha. ——Taught to this point, the treatise’s meaning must be held fast: the harsh speech is a provisional manifestation of skilful means for liberating beings, not the bodhisattva truly giving rise to anger.
15. Why the eighth recompense of offence and the eating of horse-barley are still spoken of—the difference between the Great and Small Vehicles, and the pervasiveness of skilful means. Following on from this, it is further asked: if the harsh speech was skilful means, why did the Buddha receive the eighth recompense of offence, six years of austerities? The treatise answers with two causes and conditions, neither of them a real offence. First, the dharma of the Small Vehicle differs from the dharma of the Great Vehicle: the Small Vehicle mostly speaks of cutting off the bonds and taking nirvāṇa and does not speak of the hidden depths of the dharma-body; so if the Buddha did not display receiving recompense, then the gods, spirit-immortals, nāgas, ghosts and long-lived beings, seeing that there was evil karma and yet no recompense received, would say that there are no causes and conditions of karmic recompense; therefore, though there was no evil karma, he displayed receiving recompense. Second, there is a cause and condition in this present world: those of the outside paths believe in and are attached to austerities; if the Buddha did not practise austerities, people would say that a prince, accustomed to pleasure, could not practise austerities; yet the outside paths’ austerities at their utmost go no further than three months, half a year, or a year, and none of them could 「日食一麻一米」 tr. "eat one sesame seed and one grain of rice a day" for six years; so the Buddha practised austerities for six years to make them believe and enter the right path. Since both are skilful means, how is it known that they are not real offences? Because the buddhas 「斷一切不善法、成就一切善法」 tr. "have cut off all unwholesome dharmas and accomplished all wholesome dharmas"; if they really received the recompense of offence, these words would not hold. The treatise further confirms skilful means with the matter of eating horse-barley: the Buddha Śākyamuni, in the time of Vipaśyin Buddha, was a great brahmin who, seeing the Buddha and the assembly of monks eating, uttered evil words: 「如是人輩,應食馬麥」 tr. "people of this sort ought to eat horse-barley"; because of this he fell into the Black-Rope Hell and underwent immeasurable suffering, and of the remaining offence, though he attained the Buddha-path, “yet for three months he ate horse-barley”—yet the śrāvaka dharma itself says that the Buddha, through three asaṃkhyeya kalpas, 「常識宿命,常不墮三惡道中」 tr. "always knew his past lives and never fell into the three evil destinies"; from Vipaśyin Buddha until now is ninety-one kalpas, and by their own dharma for ninety kalpas he ought not to fall into the evil destinies, how much less in the last kalpa; so it is known that the eating of horse-barley too is spoken as skilful means. A critic objects that “not falling into the evil destinies for a hundred kalpas” is said by the debaters of the Abhidharma Vibhāṣā and is not the Buddha’s word; the treatise answers that the Abhidharma was originally spoken by the Buddha, and the Vibhāṣā, which debates in accordance with it, ought not to be in error; and further, as Bakula, “by giving one harītakī fruit to the Saṅgha,” did not fall into the evil destinies for ninety-one kalpas, how much less would a bodhisattva who has given for immeasurable lives fall into hell for a small offence. It further takes the seven steps at birth as proof: the bodhisattva, when first born, walked seven steps and said of himself, 「我所以生者,為度眾生故」 tr. "the reason I am born is in order to liberate beings," yet for three years while being nursed he neither walked nor spoke; all infants come to walk and speak only as they gradually grow, so how could there be one who could do so at first birth and afterwards on the contrary could not? From this it can be known that it was the power of skilful means; if this skilful means is accepted, all the Buddha’s words are consistent; if it is not accepted, they become 「一實一虛」 tr. "one true and one false." The pivot of this section is from beginning to end a single sentence: the appearance of buddhas and bodhisattvas receiving the recompense of offence is a provisional manifestation made for beings of small mind, to show that karmic recompense is not empty, not that the Buddha really has offences by which he could fall.
16. Why he is born in Tuṣita and not elsewhere—the simile of the crown prince ascending the throne. Why is the bodhisattva of three births born only in Tuṣita? The treatise lists all the impossibilities: if he came from another direction, the gods, nāgas and ghosts, seeking where he came from and not knowing it, would suspect him to be an illusory conjuration; if he died among humans, was born among humans, and then became a buddha, humans would give rise to contempt and gods would not believe, for by right it is gods who ought to convert humans, not humans who ought to convert gods; the formless realm has no form and cannot teach the Dharma; the form realm is deeply attached to the flavour of meditation and cannot greatly benefit beings; in the three lower heavens of desire the fetters are thick and the coarse mind confused, and in the two upper heavens the fetters are thick and the mind soft but not sharp—only 「兜率天上,結使薄,心軟利」 tr. "in the Tuṣita Heaven the fetters are thin, and the mind soft and sharp," and it is always the dwelling-place of bodhisattvas. It is like a crown prince about to ascend the throne, who “first fasts and purifies himself for seven days in a quiet chamber” and then receives the throne; the successor bodhisattva likewise takes Tuṣita as his place of fasting, lastly receives heavenly pleasure, and when his life there ends is born below, lastly receives human pleasure, and then attains right awakening. Why do the countless gods “all attend and escort him”? Because this is his last heavenly body and he will not come to be born in the heavens again, so the gods take leave of him and vow to be born below as the bodhisattva’s donors, and also wish to guard the bodhisattva constantly, to prevent the harassment of “a hundred koṭi of Māra-enemies.”
17. The bodhisattva of the six supernormal powers—the difference between the body of birth and the dharma-body, and where the play of supernormal powers reaches. In explaining this passage the treatise marks out the stations of the supernormal powers of two kinds of bodhisattva: the dharma-body bodhisattva 「斷結使,得六神通」 tr. "has cut off the fetters and attained the six supernormal powers," while the birth-body bodhisattva 「不斷結使,或離欲得五神通」 tr. "has not cut off the fetters, or, being free of desire, attains the five supernormal powers." Those who have attained the six supernormal powers are not born in the three realms, and roam all the worlds making offerings to the buddhas of the ten directions; those who play with the supernormal powers go to the ten directions to liberate beings and rain down the seven jewels, and wherever they arrive all is the one vehicle, pure, with immeasurable lifespan. It is further asked: a bodhisattva ought to liberate beings, so why does he go only to pure worlds of immeasurable lifespan? The treatise distinguishes two kinds of bodhisattva: the first 「有慈悲心,多為眾生」 tr. "has a mind of kindness and compassion and acts mostly for beings," and so goes to places without the Buddha’s Dharma, where he praises the sound of the Three Jewels; the second 「多集諸佛功德」 tr. "mostly gathers the merits of the buddhas," and so goes to pure worlds of the one vehicle and immeasurable lifespan. The two are not superior and inferior; it is only where the vow leans, each accomplishing its own practice.
18. The three kinds of bodhisattva who first set their minds—three similes, and not doubting immediate attainment of the stage. The treatise draws this together with three similes of riding a sheep, riding a horse, and riding supernormal power: one whose offences are many and merit little is like riding a sheep—after a long, long time he may arrive or may not; one whose merit is much and offences few is like riding a horse—he will certainly arrive somewhere; one who practises only pure merit is like riding supernormal power—in the moment of setting his mind he arrives. The three similes are not meant to divide grades, but to make clear that ‘attaining avaivartika at the first setting of the mind’ is not skipping steps, but the natural result of merit gathered long in past lives, sharp faculties and a firm mind, and further of hearing the Dharma from a buddha—just as with the mark of supernormal power, one should not doubt “how one can arrive in the space of setting the mind.” Beyond these three kinds of arousing the mind, the treatise separately brings out two further bodhisattvas: one attains awakening at the first arousing of the mind, turns the wheel of the Dharma, liberates beings, enters nirvāṇa without remainder, and yet “leaves a conjured buddha to liberate beings,” whose Dharma abides for a kalpa or somewhat less than a kalpa, and those liberated are not few; one is in accord with prajñā as soon as he arouses the mind, attains the six supernormal powers, together with immeasurable beings contemplates the pure lands of the ten directions, and adorns his own land. The First Part concludes with Amitābha Buddha, who in a former life was the bhikṣu Dharma Treasury and, guided by a buddha, surveyed the ten directions everywhere and chose a pure land—gathering the rebirth, the meeting of the buddhas, the skilful means and the advance spoken of before into one concrete vow: purifying the buddha-world.
Do Not Misread
Do not read ‘the chapter on rebirth speaks of coming and going’ as the Buddha retreating to a real self. Behind every “there is” in this whole part there presses a sentence of ‘nothing to be attained’: saying there are beings is the gate of worldly truth, saying beings have no existence is the gate of the highest meaning, and only when both gates hold at once are there the two truths. Nor read “constantly meeting the buddhas” as a kind of good luck or benefit; it is the necessary accompaniment of not departing from prajñā and deeply entering great compassion, and once one departs from the Buddha and cuts off the condition of prajñā, the mark of meeting the Buddha is lost. Still less read the two kinds of bodhisattva, and having or lacking skilful means, as an examination of qualifications—the treatise distinguishes the karma-born and the body of dharma-nature, having skilful means and lacking skilful means, so that one may see clearly whether what one relies on at this moment is the flavour of meditation or compassion, grasping marks or accord—not so that one hurries to assign oneself to some grade. Ultimate emptiness does not screen off rebirth; conversely, rebirth never shakes ultimate emptiness.
The most important point is that, when reading the stories of the harsh speech before Kāśyapa Buddha, the six years of austerities and the eating of horse-barley, one must never read them as the buddhas and bodhisattvas truly having offences by which they could fall, or as their truly having given rise to anger. The treatise’s judgements are clear all the way through: Uttara’s harsh words were a provisional manifestation made while 「住諸法實相智中,入無上方便慧」 tr. "abiding in the knowledge of the real mark of all dharmas, entering unsurpassed wisdom of skilful means," and 「非是實也」 tr. "this was not real"; a bodhisattva of three births does not give rise to anger even toward ordinary people, how much less toward a buddha; the six years of austerities and the eating of horse-barley were displays of receiving recompense made for the gods and spirits of long life who do not see karmic recompense, for those of the outside paths who believe in and are attached to austerities, and for beings of small mind—「非實罪也」 tr. "they are not real offences"—because the buddhas 「斷一切不善法、成就一切善法」 tr. "have cut off all unwholesome dharmas and accomplished all wholesome dharmas," and if they really received offences, these words would not hold. These passages are this treatise’s direct teaching material on the meaning of “skilful means,” and the reader’s duty is to transmit faithfully the causes and conditions and the judgements it states—neither concealing on the bodhisattva’s behalf the appearance of his harsh speech, nor turning the displayed recompense into real offence. As the treatise says it, so one takes it. As for the back-and-forth questioning of old between the Great and Small Vehicles on this matter, the treatise has already recorded their words side by side and marked them as skilful means; here too only their questions and answers are noted, without separately judging right and wrong.
Bearing on Practice
The First Part can serve as a mirror in which to look at the mind. When cultivating concentration, one can ask: am I attached to the flavour of meditation, or am I keeping the Buddha-path in mind and entering a mind of kindness, letting meditation join with compassion and wisdom? When meeting favourable or adverse births and deaths, one can ask: am I treating them as the migration of a real self and giving rise to views of annihilation and permanence, or seeing them as the continuity of causes and conditions, in which karmic recompense is not lost and yet not a single thing is grasped? When arousing the mind to seek progress, one can ask: am I pleased with myself at standing higher than yesterday, or honestly gathering merit over a long time, not departing from prajñā and from beings? If one can stand firm in answering these three questions, then within “no coming and going” one can truly be “reborn”—not moving the meaning of emptiness, and yet in thought after thought not departing from the Buddha, not departing from beings.
Further Resonances
When later ancient masters read this part, what was taken up first was precisely the passage on the two truths at the opening. One who classified the teachings set this chapter’s ‘there are bodhisattvas who are reborn’ against the preceding chapter’s ‘there is no bodhisattva,’ judging them to be the two truths of the ordinary and the holy, not contradicting each other, and tied this to the Middle Way’s method of argument that ‘ultimate emptiness does not screen off birth and death’; another, following the question-and-answer structure of this passage, listed three types of teaching: speaking of the two truths together, speaking only of the highest meaning, and speaking only of worldly truth. These readings each have their own context; here only their approach is recorded, without judging which is higher. Brought back to this chapter, what is most worth keeping is not a finer classification table of rebirth, but this part’s rewriting of “coming and going”: true rebirth is not a real self migrating between buddha-lands, but vow and prajñā continuing so that the condition of the Buddha is not cut off; each taking of birth is not changing to a better destination for oneself, but taking birth in order not to depart from beings and not to depart from the Buddha. The First Part closes with the bhikṣu Dharma Treasury choosing a pure land, which fittingly hands the question ‘from where does one come, and to where does one go’ back to a vow that can be reflected on again and again—whether what I tend toward in this life still faces omniscience and all beings.