大智度論 四攝品之上Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · The Four Means of Gathering, Part 1 of 3
四攝品之上:須菩提問夢響影焰幻化無實事無所有性自相空中云何分別善不善世間出世間有漏無漏有為無為乃至四果辟支佛道阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,佛答凡夫愚人於夢化中猶起身口意三業、菩薩住畢竟空無始空為眾生說陰入界空而以方便力於慳中拔出次第安置無餘涅槃及涅槃道中;須菩提讚歎菩薩甚希有難及、佛許說聲聞辟支佛所無之希有難及法;住報得六波羅蜜五神通三十七助道法諸陀羅尼諸無礙智到十方世界隨所應而攝取;布施饒益眾生之等一布施、福田非福田分別想非菩薩法、乞身體支節不生二心、畢竟空中誰與誰受所施何物而住諸空具足檀波羅蜜;佛眼所見十方菩薩入大地獄令火滅湯冷三事教化、為諸佛給使終不忘失、為畜生捨壽命割截身體、除餓鬼飢渴苦、六欲天上說法示現火起燒宮殿、令諸梵天遠離邪見;四事攝取之布施愛語利益同事、布施攝取之財施法施、財施之所施物與所教法、法施之世間出世間二種、聖無漏法與聖無漏法果;須菩提問菩薩得一切種智不與菩薩與佛有何等異;出世間不共凡夫法逐項——四念處四正勤四如意足五根五力七覺分八聖道分三三昧八背捨九次第定佛十力四無所畏四無礙智十八不共法三十二相,末以光明遍照三千大千世界與佛音聲遍滿收(經①)
這一品從一個很不客氣的問題開始。前面幾品把「空」說盡了,須菩提於是問:「若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者,云何分別是善法、是不善法」,乃至四果、辟支佛道、無上菩提?既然什麼都空,善惡憑什麼還分?佛的回答不辯道理,只指事實:「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業」。夢是空的,夢裏造的業卻是真起的——空不礙它起,正因為它本來就起於顛倒。
菩薩要做的,不是把這場夢一口說破,而是一層層把人帶出來。經文說菩薩「住二空中——畢竟空、無始空,為眾生說法」,一面說一切法如夢如化,一面「於慳法中拔出眾生,教行檀波羅蜜」;等人貪著布施的福報了,再從福報中拔出,教他持戒;持戒生天,又從天上拔出,令住禪定;最後才「安置無餘涅槃及涅槃道中」。論主把這裏的機關點破:布施、持戒、禪定本身也是「因顛倒而生」,「雖少時益眾生,久則變異,能生苦惱故,亦教令捨離」。先給他一個可以抓的善,再奪走他所抓的——這就是本品講的方便。須菩提聽到這裏讚歎「諸菩薩摩訶薩甚希有難及」,佛許可了,並說這種希有難及之法,「一切聲聞、辟支佛不能報,何況餘人」。
底下講的希有法,第一件就是布施,而布施的頭一條是不揀擇。供養佛,與施給禽獸,「無有異」;施給正道中人,與施給凡夫,「皆無分別,等一布施」。理由只有一句:「一切法不異、不分別故。」果報也只有一句:「是菩薩無異、無別布施已,當得無分別法報,所謂一切種智。」因地不分別,果地才得無分別的智慧,因果是同一個相。反過來,若起念「佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養」,經文說得極重——「是非菩薩法」;「若分別簡擇,便墮諸佛、菩薩、辟支佛、學無學人、一切世間天及人訶責處」,而那句訶責更不留餘地:「誰請汝救一切眾生?汝為一切眾生舍、一切眾生護、一切眾生依」,既然自許是一切眾生的依靠,哪裏還有挑揀的餘地?
挑揀之外還有一層,是身。有人來乞菩薩的身體支節,經文說「是時不應生二心」,不作『若與?若不與?』的計較,因為「是菩薩摩訶薩為眾生故受身,眾生來取,何可不與」。這身本來就是為眾生受的。而真正讓這件事做得下去的,不是硬撐,是一個觀:「是中誰與、誰受?所施何物?是一切法自性皆不可得,以畢竟空故」——「住是諸空布施,是時具足檀波羅蜜」。論主後來還問:菩薩身又不是木石,怎麼割截而不生異心?答案並列了四種說法:久修忍辱的、久修慈悲的、得般若果報空心的、已是出三界法性生身的。四說並存,論主不裁一說為定。
佛眼所見的菩薩,一路看下去也全是這種不揀擇:「入大地獄,令火滅湯冷」,再「以三事教化:一者、神通,二者、知他心,三者、說法」;為諸佛作給使而不忘失法;「為畜生故,捨其壽命,割截身體,分散諸方」,讓吃到菩薩肉的眾生因此離畜生道。有人問:吃了菩薩的肉不是有罪嗎,怎麼反得度?論主答得清楚:這是菩薩本願——「若有眾生噉我肉者,當令得度」,而得度的實因不在肉,在肉所引發的慈心。至於三惡道為何不能度盡,論主用了一個很世間的比喻:「譬如大赦,及者得脫,不及者則不蒙。」
品名所繫的四攝,總標在這裏:「以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事。」布施又分兩種——「菩薩以二種施攝取眾生:財施、法施」。財施的清單很長,金銀珍寶、飲食衣服、乃至以己身給施;但財施從不停在物上,施完必定接著教:教三歸、教五戒、教禪定、教三十七道品,一直教到「無上安隱涅槃」。法施也分兩種:世間的是不淨觀、安那般那、四禪四無量四無色,凡「共凡夫所行法」都算;出世間的則是「三十七助道法、三解脫門」,其果只有一件——「斷一切煩惱習,是名聖無漏法果」。中間須菩提插問菩薩得不得一切種智,佛答得極簡:「菩薩心與佛心無有異」;論主再把這句擰緊:「今得一切種智,名為菩薩;已得一切種智,名為佛。」差別只在一個「今」與「已」。
四攝之中,布施講了三頁,其餘三事到卷八十九才各以一句收完:「菩薩摩訶薩以六波羅蜜為眾生說法」是愛語,「菩薩摩訶薩長夜教眾生,令行六波羅蜜」是利行,「菩薩摩訶薩以五神通力故種種變化,入五道中,與眾生同事」是同事。這種懸殊不是偏心,論主自己設問答了兩回:四事中何以獨廣布施?因為「布施中攝三事故,以財施、法施教化眾生,則無所不攝」,舉一即可例三。布施中何以又廣法施?因為「財施少,法施廣故」——「財施,有量果報;法施,無量果報」,財施只與三界富樂,法施能與涅槃常樂,而且「財施從法施生,聞法則能施故」。所以「以是等因緣故,廣說法施」。詳略之分,是果報的量本來如此。
相好一段最容易被當成裝飾,論主卻把它擺在一個很硬的位置上。三十二相與八十隨形好,轉輪聖王、提婆達、難陀也有幾分,何以還稱「出世間不共凡夫法」?答:「名字雖同,而威德、具足、淨潔、得處則不同於佛」——同一個名字,來處不同。又問:從頭到尾都在說五陰乃至一切種智,為什麼到論將結束才說相好?答:「佛有二種身:法身、生身。於二身中,法身為大」,法身利益大,所以先講;生身相好是聖無漏法的果報,所以放在最後。其間論十力、論性與欲,比喻一個比一個實在:佛籌量眾生可度不可度,「譬如良醫,觀其病相,審定知其可活則治之,不可活者則捨之」;性與欲之別是「性在內,欲在外。性重,欲輕。性難除,欲易捨。性深,欲淺」;一切到處道力與天眼力之別是「天眼但見生死時」,此力卻能未死而知因果。至於三十二相何以恰好與轉輪聖王同數,論主先答「三十二相不多不少,義如先說」,隨後並列其餘三說,四說並錄,其中一說極有意思——相是隨眾生所好而現的,有的地方不貴金色,有的地方以長指利爪為羅剎相、以手網縵為水鳥相,所以「是故佛隨眾生所好而為現相好。如是等,無有常定」。四說並列,論主同樣不裁。
到了八十隨形好,有兩條不像身相:一條是「識滿足」,一條是「住處安」。論主特地為這兩條設問。識滿足是什麼?「此識是果報生識,世間好醜自然而知」,不是學來的。住處安是什麼?「住處安者,如白衣勇士,牢持器仗,安據住處,則不可動」——出家之時,魔民惡鬼也動搖他不得。緊接著是四十二字門:「一字皆入四十二字,四十二字亦入一字」,而次第是「善學四十二字已,能善說字法;善說字法已,善說無字法」,歸結是「過一切名字故,名為佛法」。論主把這個次第說得更透:「善知字故,善知諸法名;善知諸法名故,善知諸法義。無字即是諸法實相義。」字是門,無字才是義;不由字不入,停在字上又不達。
最後一段是全品最緊的地方。眾生不可得、法不可得、法性也不可得,那菩薩憑什麼還為眾生說法?佛先把一切空掉一遍,然後說:「菩薩摩訶薩如是見一切法空,為眾生說法,不失諸空相」,並舉化人為喻——佛所化的人再化出無量人,教布施、教持戒,而「是化人無心、無心數法,云何分別破壞諸法」?說而無心,正是不壞法相。於是有那一串四重不住:「無所有法不住無所有法,所有法不住所有法,自性法不住自性法,他性法不住他性法」;論主配上兩個喻:「譬如虛空不住虛空」,「譬如火不住火中」。
再往下,須菩提步步進逼。色既不異法性,何以還分黑白果報、還分四沙門果?佛答「世諦故,分別說有果報,非第一義」。那麼凡夫也應該有須陀洹果了?佛以反問收之:「以凡夫人實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果,云何當有諸果」;「聖人知世諦、知第一義諦,有道、有修道,以是故聖人差別有諸果。」分別之所以能成立,繫於能分別者知不知;凡夫不知二諦,連世諦上的果也沒有他的分。然後佛把這個「知」也遣掉:「修道不得果,不修道亦不得果,亦不離道得果,亦不住道中得果。」論主解釋得很體貼:佛先前說修道得果,是就無著心說的;如今須菩提以著心問,「欲從道中出果,如麻中出油」,那就只好說不得。又怕人聽成不必修,補了一句「修尚不得,何況不修」,並設一喻:「譬如二人欲有所到:一者、住,不行;二者、失道。二俱不到。」不修與著心修,同樣到不了;分水嶺在「若心取相修道,雖有攝心禪定樂,無有道果」。
品末的收筆,收在說法者自己身上:「是菩薩自得無所著法,亦教人令得無所著法」,六度乃至一切種智,都教人不著。而那最後一句,像是把整品的力氣都放下了——「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中;於法性中不疑、不悶而說法,無罣、無礙、無遮,是則通達法性。」通達法性的人不住法性,正如火不住火中。四攝品講了那麼多攝取眾生的方法,末了只留這一個姿態:能說,而不住在所說裏;能度,而不站在能度的位置上。
This chapter begins with a very impolite question. The preceding chapters have said ‘emptiness’ to the end, and so Subhūti asks: ‘If dharmas are like a dream, like an echo, like a shadow, like a mirage, like an illusion, like a conjuration, without real substance, without any existent nature, and empty of specific marks, how are wholesome dharmas and unwholesome dharmas distinguished’, and so on up to the four fruits, the pratyekabuddha path, and unsurpassed awakening? Since everything is empty, by what are good and evil still told apart? The Buddha's answer argues no principle; it only points to a fact: ‘Ordinary foolish people find the dream and find the one who sees the dream, and so on up to finding the conjuration and finding the one who sees the conjuration, and give rise to wholesome deeds, unwholesome deeds, and indeterminate deeds of body, speech, and mind’. The dream is empty, yet the deeds done in the dream truly arise—emptiness does not hinder their arising, exactly because they arise from inversion in the first place.
What the bodhisattva has to do is not to expose this dream in one word, but to lead people out layer by layer. The sūtra says the bodhisattva ‘abides in the two emptinesses—ultimate emptiness and beginningless emptiness—and teaches the Dharma for beings’; on one side he says that all dharmas are like a dream and like a conjuration, on the other ‘he pulls beings out from the dharma of stinginess and teaches them to practise dānapāramitā’; when a person has come to crave the reward of giving, he pulls him out again from the reward and teaches him to keep morality; keeping morality he is born among the gods, and again he is pulled out of the heavens and made to abide in meditative concentration; only at the last is he ‘set in nirvāṇa without remainder and in the path to nirvāṇa’. The treatise-author lays bare the mechanism here: giving, keeping morality, and meditative concentration themselves also ‘arise because of inversion’, ‘though for a short time they benefit beings, in the long run they change and can give rise to suffering and vexation, so he also teaches them to give these up’. First give him a good thing he can hold on to, then take away what he holds—this is the skilful means this chapter speaks of. Hearing this far, Subhūti praises, ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas are very rare and hard to equal’; the Buddha approves, and says that this dharma, rare and hard to equal, ‘no śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha can requite, how much less other people’.
Of the rare dharmas spoken of below, the first is giving, and the first article of giving is not picking and choosing. Making offerings to a Buddha and giving to birds and beasts ‘are without difference’; giving to a person on the right path and giving to an ordinary person ‘are all without discrimination, one and the same giving’. The reason is only one sentence: ‘because all dharmas are not different and without discrimination.’ The retribution too is only one sentence: ‘This bodhisattva, having given without difference and without distinction, will obtain the retribution of the dharma without discrimination, namely the omniscience of all kinds.’ Only when there is no discrimination on the ground of the cause is the wisdom without discrimination obtained on the ground of the fruit; cause and fruit are one and the same mark. Conversely, if the thought arises, ‘the Buddha is a field of merit, I should make offerings; birds and beasts are not a field of merit, I should not make offerings’, the sūtra speaks with the utmost weight—‘this is not the bodhisattva's dharma’; ‘if he discriminates and picks and chooses, he falls into the place of rebuke by the buddhas, bodhisattvas, pratyekabuddhas, those in training and beyond training, and all the gods and humans of the world’, and that rebuke leaves no room: ‘Who asked you to rescue all beings? You are the house of all beings, the protection of all beings, the refuge of all beings’; since you yourself have promised to be the refuge of all beings, where is there still room to pick and choose?
Beyond picking and choosing there is one more layer, which is the body. When someone comes to beg the bodhisattva's limbs and joints, the sūtra says ‘at that time he should not give rise to two minds’, not reckoning ‘shall I give? shall I not give?’, because ‘this bodhisattva-mahāsattva receives his body for the sake of beings; when beings come to take it, how can he not give?’ This body was received for the sake of beings from the first. And what truly makes this deed doable is not gritting the teeth but a contemplation: ‘Who here gives, who receives? What thing is given? The self-nature of all these dharmas is unfindable, because of ultimate emptiness’—‘abiding in these emptinesses he gives, and at that time he makes dānapāramitā complete’. The treatise-author later also asks: the bodhisattva's body is not wood or stone; how is it cut and severed without a different mind arising? The answer sets four sayings side by side: one who has long cultivated patience, one who has long cultivated kindness and compassion, one who has obtained the empty mind that is the retribution of prajñā, and one who is already the body born of the dharma-nature beyond the three realms. The four sayings stand together, and the treatise-author rules none of them the settled one.
The bodhisattvas seen by the Buddha-eye, looked at all the way down, are all of this same not picking and choosing: ‘he enters the great hells and makes the fire go out and the boiling water grow cold’, and then ‘teaches and transforms by three things: first, supernormal power; second, knowing others' minds; third, teaching the Dharma’; he serves as attendant to the buddhas and does not forget or lose the Dharma; ‘for the sake of animals he gives up his life, cuts and severs his body, and scatters it in all directions’, so that the beings who eat the bodhisattva's flesh thereby leave the animal destiny. Someone asks: is it not a sin to eat the bodhisattva's flesh; how do they instead come to be delivered? The treatise-author answers clearly: this is the bodhisattva's original vow—‘if there are beings who eat my flesh, may they come to be delivered’—and the real cause of deliverance lies not in the flesh but in the kind mind the flesh calls forth. As for why the three evil destinies cannot be delivered to the last one, the treatise-author uses a very worldly simile: ‘It is as a great amnesty: those it reaches are freed, those it does not reach receive nothing.’
The four means of gathering to which the chapter's name is tied are marked in general here: ‘by four things he gathers in beings. What are the four? Giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour.’ Giving is further divided into two—‘the bodhisattva gathers in beings by two kinds of giving: the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma’. The list of the gift of wealth is very long: gold, silver, and precious jewels, food, drink, and clothing, and so on up to giving his own body; but the gift of wealth never stops at the thing; having given, he always goes on to teach: he teaches the three refuges, teaches the five precepts, teaches meditative concentration, teaches the thirty-seven limbs of the path, teaching all the way to ‘the unsurpassed nirvāṇa of peace and security’. The gift of Dharma too is divided into two: the worldly is the contemplation of impurity, ānāpāna, the four dhyānas, the four immeasurable minds, and the four formless absorptions, whatever counts as ‘dharmas practised in common with ordinary people’; the world-transcending is ‘the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path and the three gates of liberation’, whose fruit is only one thing—‘the cutting off of all the afflictions and their habitual residues; this is named the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows’. In between, Subhūti puts in a question whether the bodhisattva obtains the omniscience of all kinds, and the Buddha answers most simply: ‘The bodhisattva's mind and the Buddha's mind are without difference’; the treatise-author tightens this sentence further: ‘now obtaining the omniscience of all kinds, he is named bodhisattva; having obtained the omniscience of all kinds, he is named Buddha.’ The difference lies only in ‘now’ and ‘having’.
Among the four means of gathering, giving is spoken of for three pages, while the other three things are each gathered in one sentence only in fascicle eighty-nine: ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattva teaches the Dharma for beings by the six perfections’ is kind speech, ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattva through the long night teaches beings and makes them practise the six perfections’ is beneficial action, ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattva by the power of the five supernormal powers transforms himself in all kinds of ways, enters the five destinies, and shares in endeavour with beings’ is shared endeavour. This disparity is not partiality; the treatise-author himself sets the question and answers twice: why, among the four things, is giving alone spoken of broadly? Because ‘giving contains the three things; teaching and transforming beings by the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma, there is nothing it does not gather’, and raising one gives the pattern for three. Why within giving is the gift of Dharma again spoken of broadly? Because ‘the gift of wealth is little and the gift of Dharma is broad’—‘the gift of wealth has a measured retribution; the gift of Dharma has an immeasurable retribution’, the gift of wealth gives only the riches and pleasures of the three realms while the gift of Dharma can give the constant pleasure of nirvāṇa, and moreover ‘the gift of wealth arises from the gift of Dharma, for having heard the Dharma one can give’. So ‘by such causes and conditions, the gift of Dharma is spoken of broadly’. The division of detail and brevity is as the measure of the retribution is from the first.
The passage on the marks and minor signs is the easiest to take as ornament, yet the treatise-author sets it in a very hard place. The thirty-two marks and the eighty minor marks—the wheel-turning sage king, Devadatta, and Nanda have some share of them; why are they still called ‘world-transcending dharmas not shared with ordinary people’? Answer: ‘though the names are the same, in majesty, completeness, purity, and the place of their obtaining they are not the same as the Buddha's’—the same name, a different source. Again it is asked: from beginning to end it has spoken of the five aggregates and so on up to the omniscience of all kinds; why does it speak of the marks and minor signs only when the treatise is about to close? Answer: ‘The Buddha has two kinds of body: the Dharma body and the fleshly body. Of the two bodies, the Dharma body is the greater’, the Dharma body's benefit is great, so it is spoken of first; the marks and minor signs of the fleshly body are the retribution of the noble dharmas without outflows, so they are placed last. In between, discussing the ten powers and discussing nature and desire, the similes grow more concrete one after another: the Buddha reckons which beings can be delivered and which cannot, ‘as a good physician looks at the marks of the sickness and, judging and knowing for certain that the patient can live, treats him, and where he cannot live, gives him up’; the difference between nature and desire is ‘nature is within, desire is without. Nature is heavy, desire is light. Nature is hard to remove, desire is easy to give up. Nature is deep, desire is shallow’; the difference between the power of the paths leading everywhere and the power of the divine eye is that ‘the divine eye sees only the time of birth and death’, while this power knows cause and fruit before death. As for why the thirty-two marks are exactly the same in number as the wheel-turning sage king's, the treatise-author first answers ‘the thirty-two marks are neither more nor fewer; the meaning is as explained before’, and then sets out three further sayings, four sayings recorded side by side, one of them most interesting—that the marks are shown according to what beings like, for in some places the golden colour is not prized, and in some places long fingers and sharp nails are taken as the mark of a rākṣasa and webbed hands as the mark of a water-bird, so ‘therefore the Buddha shows the marks and minor signs according to what beings like. Such as these have nothing constant and fixed’. Four sayings set side by side, and again the treatise-author does not rule.
Coming to the eighty minor marks, two of them do not look like bodily marks: one is ‘consciousness full’, one is ‘secure in his dwelling-place’. The treatise-author sets questions specially for these two. What is consciousness full? ‘This consciousness is a consciousness born as retribution, which knows of itself the fair and the foul of the world’, not learned. What is secure in his dwelling-place? ‘Secure in his dwelling-place is like a white-robed warrior who, firmly holding his weapons and securely occupying his place, cannot be moved’—at the time of leaving home, Māra's people and evil ghosts cannot shake him either. Right after come the forty-two gates of letters: ‘each one letter enters all forty-two letters, and the forty-two letters also enter one letter’, and the sequence is ‘having trained well in the forty-two letters, he can speak well of the dharma of letters; having spoken well of the dharma of letters, he speaks well of the dharma without letters’, and the conclusion is ‘because it passes beyond all names and letters, it is named the Buddha's Dharma’. The treatise-author states this sequence more thoroughly: ‘Because he knows letters well, he knows well the names of dharmas; because he knows well the names of dharmas, he knows well the meaning of dharmas. Being without letters is precisely the meaning of the real mark of all dharmas.’ Letters are the gate, being without letters is the meaning; without letters one does not enter, and stopping at letters one does not arrive.
The last passage is the tightest place of the whole chapter. Beings are unfindable, dharmas are unfindable, the nature of dharmas too is unfindable; by what then does the bodhisattva still teach the Dharma for beings? The Buddha first empties everything once more, and then says: ‘The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, thus seeing all dharmas as empty, teaches the Dharma for beings and does not lose the marks of the emptinesses’, and raises the simile of the conjured person—a person conjured by the Buddha further conjures immeasurable people and teaches them giving and teaches them to keep morality, and ‘this conjured person is without mind and without mental-factor dharmas; how could he discriminate and destroy dharmas?’ To speak while without mind is exactly not to destroy the marks of dharmas. Then comes that string of four not-abidings: ‘the dharma without anything existent does not abide in the dharma without anything existent; the existent dharma does not abide in the existent dharma; the dharma of self-nature does not abide in the dharma of self-nature; the dharma of other-nature does not abide in the dharma of other-nature’; the treatise-author matches it with two similes: ‘It is as space does not abide in space’, ‘It is as fire does not abide within fire.’
Further on, Subhūti presses step by step. Since form is not different from the nature of dharmas, why are black and white retributions still distinguished, and the four fruits of the śramaṇa? The Buddha answers, ‘by reason of worldly truth retribution is spoken of with distinctions; it is not the highest meaning’. Then should ordinary people too have the fruit of the srota-āpanna? The Buddha gathers it with a question in return: ‘Because ordinary people really do not know worldly truth, do not know the truth of the highest meaning, do not know the path, and do not know how to distinguish the fruits of the path, how should they have the fruits’; ‘the sages know worldly truth, know the truth of the highest meaning, have the path, and have the cultivation of the path; therefore the sages have the various fruits with distinctions.’ That distinction can be established hangs on whether the one who distinguishes knows; ordinary people do not know the two truths, so even the fruits within worldly truth are no share of theirs. Then the Buddha dispels this ‘knowing’ too: ‘Cultivating the path he does not obtain the fruit; not cultivating the path he does not obtain the fruit either; nor does he obtain the fruit apart from the path; nor does he obtain the fruit abiding within the path.’ The treatise-author explains with great consideration: when the Buddha earlier said that cultivating the path one obtains the fruit, this was said with regard to the mind without clinging; now Subhūti asks with a clinging mind, ‘wishing to bring the fruit out from within the path, as oil is brought out from sesame’, and so one can only say that it is not obtained. Fearing again that people will hear this as no need to cultivate, he adds a sentence, ‘even cultivating, it is not obtained, how much less without cultivating’, and sets a simile: ‘It is as two people who wish to reach somewhere: one stays and does not go; one loses the road. Neither of the two arrives.’ Not cultivating and cultivating with a clinging mind alike fail to arrive; the watershed lies in ‘if the mind grasps at marks and cultivates the path, though there is the pleasure of meditative concentration that gathers the mind, there is no fruit of the path’.
The closing stroke of the chapter comes back upon the one who teaches: ‘this bodhisattva himself obtains the dharma without clinging, and also teaches others and makes them obtain the dharma without clinging’, the six perfections and so on up to the omniscience of all kinds, all taught to others without clinging. And that last sentence seems to set down the whole chapter's strength—‘One who thoroughly penetrates does not grasp at the mark of the nature of dharmas and does not abide within the nature of dharmas; within the nature of dharmas he teaches the Dharma without doubt and without oppression, without hindrance, without obstruction, without blocking: this is to penetrate the nature of dharmas.’ One who penetrates the nature of dharmas does not abide in the nature of dharmas, just as fire does not abide within fire. The chapter on the four means of gathering has spoken of so many ways of gathering in beings, and at the end leaves only this one posture: able to speak, yet not abiding in what is spoken; able to deliver, yet not standing in the position of the one who delivers.
卷88 〔T25 0677c26〕
大智度論釋四攝品第七十八 【經】 須菩提白佛言:「世尊!若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者,云何分別是善法、是不善法,是世間法、〔T25 0678a〕是出世間法,是有漏法、是無漏法,是有為法、是無為法,是法能得須陀洹果,能得斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果,能得辟支佛道,能得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?」 佛告須菩提:「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業,起福業、若起罪業、作不動業。是菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,住二空中——畢竟空、無始空,為眾生說法,作是言:『諸眾生!是色空無所有,受、想、行、識空無所有;十二入、十八界空無所有。色是夢,受、想、行、識是夢;十二入、十八界是夢。色是響、是影、是焰、是幻、是化,受、想、行、識亦如是。十二入、十八界是夢、是響、是影、是焰、是幻、是化。是中無陰、入、界,無夢亦無見夢者,無響亦無聞響者,無影亦無見影者,無焰亦無見焰者,無幻亦無見幻者,無化亦無見化者。一切法無根本實性無所有,汝等於無陰中見有陰、無入見有入、無界見有界。是一切法皆從因緣和合生,以顛倒心起,屬業果報,汝等何以故於諸法空無根本中而取根本相?』 「是時,菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,以方便力故,於慳法中拔出眾生,教行檀波羅蜜;持是布施功德,得大福報。從大福報拔出,教令持戒;持戒功德,生天上尊貴處。復拔出,令住初禪;初禪功德生梵天處。二禪、三禪、四禪、無邊空處、無邊識處、無所有處、非有想非無想處亦如是。眾生行是布施及布施果報,持戒及持戒果報,禪定及禪定果報,種種因緣拔出,安置無餘涅槃及涅槃道中,所謂四念處、四正勤、四如意足、五根、五力、〔T25 0678b〕七覺分、八聖道分,空解脫門、無相、無作解脫門,八背捨、九次第定,佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法,安隱眾生,令住聖無漏法——無色、無形、無對法中。有可得須陀洹果者,安隱教化,令住須陀洹果;可得斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果、辟支佛道者,令住斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果、辟支佛道;可得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提者,亦安隱教化,令住阿耨多羅三藐三菩提中。」 須菩提白佛言:「世尊!諸菩薩摩訶薩甚希有難及,能行是深般若波羅蜜,諸法無所有性,畢竟空、無始空,而分別諸法是善、是不善,是有漏、是無漏,乃至是有為、是無為。」 佛告須菩提:「如是!如是!諸菩薩摩訶薩甚希有難及,能行是深般若波羅蜜,諸法無所有性,畢竟空、無始空,而分別諸法。須菩提!汝等若知是菩薩摩訶薩希有難及法,則知一切聲聞、辟支佛不能報,何況餘人!」 須菩提白佛言:「世尊!何等是菩薩摩訶薩希有難及法,諸聲聞、辟支佛所無有?」 佛告須菩提:「一心諦聽!有菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,住報得六波羅蜜中及住報得五神通、三十七助道法,住諸陀羅尼、諸無礙智,到十方世界,可以布施度者,以布施攝之;可以持戒度者,以持戒攝之;可以忍辱、精進、禪定、智慧度者,隨其所應而攝取之。可以初禪度者,以初禪攝取之;可以二禪、三禪、四禪、無邊空處、無邊識處、無所有處、非有想非無想處度者,隨其所應而攝取之。可以慈、悲、喜、捨心度者,以慈、悲、喜、捨心攝取之。可以四念處、四正勤、四〔T25 0678c〕如意足、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分,空三昧、無相、無作三昧度者,隨所攝之。」 「世尊!菩薩摩訶薩云何以布施饒益眾生?」 「須菩提!菩薩行般若波羅蜜時布施,隨其所須飲食、衣服、車馬、香華、瓔珞、種種所須,盡給與之。若供養佛、辟支佛、阿羅漢、阿那含、斯陀含、須陀洹等無有異;若施入正道中人及凡人,下至禽獸,皆無分別,等一布施。何以故?一切法不異、不分別故。是菩薩無異、無別布施已,當得無分別法報,所謂一切種智。須菩提!若菩薩摩訶薩見乞匃者,若生是心:『佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養。』是非菩薩法。何以故?菩薩摩訶薩發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,不作是念:『是眾生應以布施饒益,是不應布施。』是眾生布施因緣故,應生剎利大姓、婆羅門大姓、居士大家,乃至以是布施因緣,以三乘法度之,令入無餘涅槃。若眾生來從菩薩乞,亦不生異心分別:『應與是,不應與是。』何以故?是菩薩為是眾生故發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心;若分別簡擇,便墮諸佛、菩薩、辟支佛、學無學人、一切世間天及人訶責處:『誰請汝救一切眾生?汝為一切眾生舍、一切眾生護、一切眾生依,而分別簡擇應與、不應與?』 「復次,若菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,若人、若非人來,欲求乞菩薩身體支節,是時不應生二心:『若與?若不與?』何以故?是菩薩摩訶薩為眾生故受身,眾生來取,何可不與?『我以饒益眾生故受是身,眾生不乞,自應與之,何況乞而不與!』菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,〔T25 0679a〕應如是學。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩見有乞者,應生是念:『是中誰與、誰受?所施何物?是一切法自性皆不可得,以畢竟空故;空相法,無與、無奪。』何以故?畢竟空故,內空故,外空、內外空、大空、第一義空、自相空故。住是諸空布施,是時具足檀波羅蜜。具足檀波羅蜜故,若斷內外法時,作是念:『截我者誰?割我者誰?』 「復次,須菩提!我以佛眼見東方如恒河沙等諸菩薩摩訶薩入大地獄,令火滅湯冷,以三事教化:一者、神通,二者、知他心,三者、說法。是菩薩以神通力,令大地獄火滅湯冷;知他心;以慈、悲、喜、捨,隨意說法。是眾生於菩薩生清淨心,從地獄得脫,漸以三乘法得盡苦際。南西北方、四維、上下亦如是。復次,須菩提!我以佛眼觀十方世界,見如恒河沙等國土中諸菩薩,為諸佛給使,供養諸佛,隨意愛樂恭敬;若諸佛所說,盡能受持,乃至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,終不忘失。 「復次,須菩提!我以佛眼觀十方如恒河沙等國土中諸菩薩摩訶薩,為畜生故,捨其壽命,割截身體,分散諸方。諸有眾生食是諸菩薩摩訶薩肉者,皆愛敬菩薩;以愛敬故,即得離畜生道,值遇諸佛,聞佛說法,如說修行,漸以三乘——聲聞、辟支佛、佛法於無餘涅槃而般涅槃。如是,須菩提!諸菩薩摩訶薩所益甚多——教化眾生令發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,如說修行,乃至於無餘涅槃而般涅槃。 「復次,須菩提!我以佛眼見十方如恒河沙等國土中諸菩薩摩訶薩除諸餓鬼飢渴苦,是諸餓鬼皆愛敬菩薩;以愛〔T25 0679b〕敬故,得離餓鬼道,值遇諸佛,聞諸佛說法,如說修行,漸以三乘——聲聞、辟支佛、佛法而般涅槃,乃至無餘涅槃。如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩為度眾生故,行大悲心。 「復次,須菩提!我以佛眼見諸菩薩摩訶薩在四天王天上說法,在三十三天、夜摩天、兜率陀天、化樂天、他化自在天上說法;諸天聞菩薩說法,漸以三乘而得滅度。須菩提!是諸天眾中有貪著五欲者,是菩薩示現火起,燒其宮殿,而為說法,作是言:『諸天!一切有為法悉皆無常,誰得安者?』 「復次,須菩提!我以佛眼觀十方世界,見如恒河沙等國土中諸梵天著於邪見,諸菩薩摩訶薩教令遠離邪見,作是言:『汝等云何於空相虛妄諸法中而生邪見?』如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩住大慈心,為眾生說法。須菩提!是為諸菩薩希有難及法。 「復次,須菩提!我以佛眼觀十方世界如恒河沙等國土中,諸菩薩摩訶薩以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事。 「云何菩薩以布施攝取眾生?須菩提!菩薩以二種施攝取眾生:財施、法施。 「何等財施攝取眾生?須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩以金、銀、琉璃、頗梨、真珠、珂貝、珊瑚等諸寶物,或以飲食、衣服、臥具、房舍、燈燭、華、香、瓔珞,若男、若女,若牛、羊、象、馬、車乘,若以己身,給施眾生;語眾生言:『汝等若有所須,各來取之,如取己物,莫得疑難!』是菩薩施已,教三歸依:歸依佛、歸依法、歸依僧;或教受五戒,或教一日戒;或教初禪乃至教非有想非無想定,或教慈、悲、喜、捨,或教念佛、念法、念僧、念戒、念捨、念天,或〔T25 0679c〕教不淨觀,或教安那般那觀,或相、或觸;或教四念處、四正勤、四如意足、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分,空三昧,無相、無作三昧,八背捨、九次第定,佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、大慈大悲、三十二相、八十隨形好;或教須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果,或教辟支佛道,或教阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,以方便力教眾生,財施已,後教令得無上安隱涅槃。須菩提!是名菩薩摩訶薩希有難及法。 「須菩提!菩薩云何以法施攝取眾生?須菩提!法施有二種:一者、世間,二者、出世間。何等為世間法施?敷演、顯示世間法,所謂不淨觀、安那般那念、四禪、四無量心、四無色定。如是等世間法,及諸餘共凡夫所行法,是名世間法施。是菩薩如是世間法施已,以種種因緣教化,令遠離世間法;遠離世間法已,以方便力,令得聖無漏法及聖無漏法果。何等是聖無漏法?何等是聖無漏法果?聖無漏法者,三十七助道法、三解脫門。聖無漏法果者,須陀洹果乃至阿羅漢果,辟支佛道,阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩聖無漏法:須陀洹果中智慧乃至阿羅漢果中智慧、辟支佛道中智慧、三十七助道法中智慧、六波羅蜜中智慧乃至大慈大悲中智慧——如是等一切法,若世間若出世間智慧、若有漏若無漏、若有為若無為,是法中一切種智,是名菩薩摩訶薩聖無漏法。何等為聖無漏法果?斷一切煩惱習,是名聖無漏法果。」 須菩提白〔T25 0680a〕佛言:「世尊!菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智不?」 佛言:「如是!如是!須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智。」 須菩提言:「菩薩與佛有何等異?」 佛言:「有異。菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智,是名為佛。所以者何?菩薩心與佛心無有異。菩薩住是一切種智中,於一切法無不照明,是名菩薩摩訶薩世間法施。須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩因世間法施,得出世間法施。如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩教眾生令得世間法已,以方便力教令得出世間法。 「須菩提!何等是菩薩出世間法不共凡夫法同?所謂四念處、四正勤、四如意足、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分,三解脫門、八背捨、九次第定,佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、三十二相、八十隨形好,五百陀羅尼門,是名出世間法。 「須菩提!云何為四念處?菩薩摩訶薩觀內身循身觀、觀外身循身觀、觀內外身循身觀,勤精進,以一心智慧觀身、觀身集因緣、觀身滅、觀身集生滅;行是道,無所依,於世間無所愛。受、心、法念處,亦如是。 「須菩提!云何為四正勤?未生惡不善法,為不生故,勤、生欲、精進;已生惡不善法,為斷故,勤、生欲、精進;未生善法,為生故,勤、生欲、精進;已生諸善法,為增長修具足故,勤、生欲、精進;是名四正勤。 「須菩提!云何為四如意足?欲三昧斷行成就初如意足,精進三昧、心三昧、思惟三昧斷行成就如意足。 「云何為五根?信根、精進根、念根、定根、慧根。 「云何為五力?信力、精進力、念力、定力、慧力。 「云何為七覺分?念覺分、擇法覺分、精進覺分、喜覺分、除息覺分、定覺〔T25 0680b〕分、捨覺分。 「云何為八聖道分?正見、正思惟、正語、正業、正命、正精進、正念、正定。 「云何為三三昧?空三昧門,無相、無作三昧門。云何為空三昧?以空行、無我行攝心,是名空三昧。云何為無相三昧?以寂滅行、離行攝心,是為無相三昧。云何為無作三昧?無常行、苦行攝心,是為無作三昧。 「云何為八背捨?內色相外觀色,是初背捨;內無色相外觀色,是二背捨;淨背捨,是三背捨;過一切色相,滅一切對相,不念一切異相故,觀無邊虛空,入無邊空處;乃至過一切非有想非無想處,入滅受想背捨。是名八背捨。 「云何九次第定?行者離欲、惡不善法,有覺有觀,離生喜樂,入初禪;第二、第三、第四禪;乃至過非有想非無想處,入滅受想定。是名九次第定。 「云何為佛十力?是處、不是處,如實知;知眾生過去、未來、現在諸業諸受法,知造業處,知因緣,知報;諸禪定、解脫、三昧、定垢淨分別相,如實知;知他眾生諸根上下相;知他眾生種種欲解;知一切世間種種無數性;知一切到道相;知種種宿命,一世乃至無量劫,如實知;天眼見眾生,乃至生善惡道;漏盡故,無漏心解脫,如實知。是為佛十力。 「云何為佛四無所畏?佛作誠言:『我是一切正智人。』若有沙門、婆羅門,若天、若魔、若梵、若復餘眾如實言:『是法不知。』乃至不見是微畏相。『以是故,我得安隱、得無所畏,安住聖主處,在大眾中師子吼,能轉梵輪;諸沙門、婆羅門,若天、若魔、若梵、若復餘眾實不能轉。』一無畏也。佛作誠言:『我一切漏盡。』若有沙〔T25 0680c〕門、婆羅門,若天、若魔、若梵、若復餘眾如實言:『是漏不盡。』乃至不見是微畏相。『以是故,我得安隱、得無所畏,安住聖主處,在大眾中作師子吼,能轉梵輪;諸沙門、婆羅門,若天、若魔、若梵、若復餘眾實不能轉。』二無畏也。佛作誠言:『我說障法。』若有沙門、婆羅門,若天、若魔、若梵、若復餘眾如實言:『受是法不障道。』乃至不見是微畏相。『以是故,我得安隱、得無所畏,安住聖主處,在大眾中師子吼,能轉梵輪;諸沙門、婆羅門,若天、若魔、若梵、若復餘眾實不能轉。』三無畏也。佛作誠言:『我所說聖道,能出世間;隨是行,能盡苦。』若有沙門、婆羅門,若天、若魔、若梵、若復餘眾如實言:『行是道不能出世間、不能盡苦。』乃至不見是微畏相。『以是故,我得安隱、得無所畏,安住聖主處,在大眾中師子吼,能轉梵輪;諸沙門、婆羅門,若天、若魔、若梵、若復餘眾實不能轉。』四無畏也。 「云何為四無礙智?一者、義無礙智,二者、法無礙智,三者、辭無礙智,四者、樂說無礙智。云何為義無礙智?緣義智慧,是為義無礙智。云何為法無礙智?緣法智慧,是為法無礙智。云何為辭無礙智?緣辭智慧,是為辭無礙智。云何為樂說無礙智?緣樂說智慧,是為樂說無礙智。 「云何為十八不共法?一者、諸佛身無失,二者、口無失,三、念無失,四、無異想,五、無不定心,六、無不知已捨心,七、欲無減,八、精進無減,九、念無減,十、慧無減,十一、解脫無減,十二、解脫知見無減,十三、一切身業隨智慧行,十四、一切口業隨智慧行,十五、一切意業隨智慧行,〔T25 0681a〕十六、智慧知過去世無礙,十七、智慧知未來世無礙,十八、智慧知現在世無礙。 「云何三十二相?一者、足下安平立平如奩底;二者、足下千輻輞輪,輪相具足;三者、手足指長勝於餘人;四者、手足柔軟勝餘身分;五者、足跟廣具足滿好;六者、手足指合縵網勝於餘人;七者、足趺高平好,與跟相稱;八者、伊泥延鹿𨄔,𨄔纖好,如伊泥延鹿王;九者、平住兩手摩膝;十者、陰藏相,如馬王、象王;十一者、身縱廣等,如尼俱盧樹;十二者、一一孔一毛生,色青、柔軟、右旋;十三者、毛上向,青色柔軟右旋;十四者、金色相,其色微妙勝閻浮檀金;十五者、身光面一丈;十六者、皮薄細滑不受塵垢,不停蚊蜹;十七者、七處滿:兩足下、兩手中、兩肩上、項中皆滿字相分明;十八者、兩腋下滿;十九者、上身如師子;二十者、身廣端直;二十一者、肩圓好;二十二者、四十齒;二十三者、齒白齊密而根深;二十四者、四牙最白而大;二十五者、方頰車如師子;二十六者、味中得上味,咽中二處津液流出;二十七者、舌大、軟、薄,能覆面至耳髮際;二十八者、梵音深遠,如迦蘭頻伽聲;二十九者、眼色如金精;三十者、眼睫如牛王;三十一者、眉間白毫相,軟白如兜羅綿;三十二者、頂髻肉成。是三十二相,佛身成就。 「光明遍照三千大千世界,若欲廣照,則遍滿十方無量阿僧祇世界,為眾生故受丈光;若放無量光明,則無日月、時節、歲數。佛音聲遍滿三千大千世界,若欲大聲,則遍滿十方無量阿僧祇世界;隨眾多少,音聲遍至。」 〔T25 0681b〕
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
本品題為《大智度論》釋〈四攝品〉第七十八,聖者龍樹所造,後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什所譯,在卷八十八。之上一單元所釋,是本品的經文前段。
經①:須菩提問畢竟空中云何分別諸法——佛答凡夫於夢化中猶起三業、菩薩住二空說法而以方便力次第拔出;須菩提讚歎希有難及、佛許說菩薩希有難及法;住報得六度五通隨所應攝取;布施饒益眾生之等一布施、不作福田分別、乞身不生二心、畢竟空中具足檀波羅蜜;佛眼所見十方菩薩六事益生;四事攝取與布施之財法二施;聖無漏法及其果;菩薩得一切種智不、菩薩與佛何異;出世間不共凡夫法逐項乃至三十二相、光明與音聲遍滿
須菩提向佛稟白:『世尊!如果一切法都像夢、像回響、像影子、像陽焰、像幻術、像變化,沒有真實之事、沒有所有之性、自相是空的,那麼怎麼分別這是善法、這是不善法,這是世間法、這是出世間法,這是有漏法、這是無漏法,這是有為法、這是無為法,這法能得須陀洹果,能得斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果,能得辟支佛道,能得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提呢?』
佛告訴須菩提:『凡夫愚人得到夢、得到見夢的人,乃至得到變化、得到見變化的人,起身、口、意的善業、不善業、無記業,起福業、或者起罪業、作不動業。這菩薩摩訶薩修行般若波羅蜜,安住在二空之中——畢竟空、無始空,為眾生說法,說這樣的話:『諸位眾生!這色是空、無所有,受、想、行、識是空、無所有;十二入、十八界是空、無所有。色是夢,受、想、行、識是夢;十二入、十八界是夢。色是回響、是影子、是陽焰、是幻術、是變化,受、想、行、識也是這樣。十二入、十八界是夢、是回響、是影子、是陽焰、是幻術、是變化。這其中沒有陰、沒有入、沒有界,沒有夢也沒有見夢的人,沒有回響也沒有聞回響的人,沒有影子也沒有見影子的人,沒有陽焰也沒有見陽焰的人,沒有幻術也沒有見幻術的人,沒有變化也沒有見變化的人。一切法沒有根本、沒有實性、無所有,你們卻在沒有陰之中見有陰、在沒有入之中見有入、在沒有界之中見有界。這一切法都是從因緣和合而生,以顛倒之心而起,屬於業的果報,你們為什麼在諸法空、沒有根本之中而取根本之相呢?』
『這時候,菩薩摩訶薩修行般若波羅蜜,以方便力的緣故,從慳吝之法中拔出眾生,教他修行檀波羅蜜;持這布施的功德,得大福報。又從大福報中拔出,教他持戒;持戒的功德,生在天上尊貴之處。又再拔出,令他安住初禪;初禪的功德,生在梵天之處。二禪、三禪、四禪、無邊空處、無邊識處、無所有處、非有想非無想處也是這樣。眾生修行這布施以及布施的果報,持戒以及持戒的果報,禪定以及禪定的果報,以種種因緣拔出他們,安置在無餘涅槃以及涅槃之道中,也就是四念處、四正勤、四如意足、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分,空解脫門、無相解脫門、無作解脫門,八背捨、九次第定,佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法,安穩眾生,令他們安住在聖無漏法——無色、無形、無對的法之中。有可以得須陀洹果的人,就安穩教化,令他安住須陀洹果;可以得斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果、辟支佛道的人,就令他安住斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果、辟支佛道;可以得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提的人,也安穩教化,令他安住在阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之中。』
須菩提向佛稟白:『世尊!諸位菩薩摩訶薩甚為希有、難可企及,能修行這深般若波羅蜜,諸法沒有所有之性、畢竟空、無始空,而還能分別諸法是善、是不善,是有漏、是無漏,乃至是有為、是無為。』
佛告訴須菩提:『是這樣!是這樣!諸位菩薩摩訶薩甚為希有、難可企及,能修行這深般若波羅蜜,諸法沒有所有之性、畢竟空、無始空,而還能分別諸法。須菩提!你們如果知道這菩薩摩訶薩希有難及之法,就知道一切聲聞、辟支佛都不能酬報,何況其餘的人!』
須菩提向佛稟白:『世尊!什麼是菩薩摩訶薩希有難及之法,是諸聲聞、辟支佛所沒有的呢?』
佛告訴須菩提:『一心諦聽!有菩薩摩訶薩修行般若波羅蜜,安住在報得的六波羅蜜之中,以及安住在報得的五神通、三十七助道法,安住在諸陀羅尼、諸無礙智之中,到十方世界去:可以用布施度化的,就以布施攝受他;可以用持戒度化的,就以持戒攝受他;可以用忍辱、精進、禪定、智慧度化的,就隨他所應而攝取他。可以用初禪度化的,就以初禪攝取他;可以用二禪、三禪、四禪、無邊空處、無邊識處、無所有處、非有想非無想處度化的,就隨他所應而攝取他。可以用慈、悲、喜、捨之心度化的,就以慈、悲、喜、捨之心攝取他。可以用四念處、四正勤、四如意足、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分,空三昧、無相三昧、無作三昧度化的,就隨其所應而攝取他。』
『世尊!菩薩摩訶薩怎樣以布施饒益眾生呢?』
『須菩提!菩薩修行般若波羅蜜的時候行布施,隨他所需要的飲食、衣服、車馬、香華、瓔珞、種種所需,全部給與他。若是供養佛、辟支佛、阿羅漢、阿那含、斯陀含、須陀洹等,沒有差異;若是布施給已入正道之中的人以及凡夫之人,下至禽獸,都沒有分別,平等而為一布施。為什麼呢?因為一切法不異、不分別的緣故。這菩薩無異、無別地布施之後,當得無分別的法報,也就是一切種智。須菩提!若菩薩摩訶薩見到乞討的人,如果生起這樣的心:『佛是福田,我應當供養;禽獸不是福田,不應當供養。』這不是菩薩之法。為什麼呢?菩薩摩訶薩發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,不作這樣的念頭:『這眾生應當以布施饒益,這眾生不應當布施。』這眾生因為布施的因緣,應當生在剎利大姓、婆羅門大姓、居士大家,乃至以這布施的因緣,以三乘之法度化他,令他進入無餘涅槃。若有眾生前來向菩薩乞求,也不生起異心分別:『應當給這個,不應當給那個。』為什麼呢?因為這菩薩正是為這眾生的緣故而發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心;若是分別簡擇,便墮在諸佛、菩薩、辟支佛、學人與無學人、一切世間天與人的訶責之處:『誰請你救一切眾生?你作一切眾生的舍宅、一切眾生的救護、一切眾生的依止,卻分別簡擇應當給、不應當給嗎?』
『再者,若菩薩摩訶薩修行般若波羅蜜的時候,若有人、若有非人前來,想要乞求菩薩的身體支節,這時候不應當生起兩種心:『要給嗎?還是不給?』為什麼呢?因為這菩薩摩訶薩是為眾生的緣故而受此身,眾生前來索取,怎麼可以不給?『我為饒益眾生的緣故而受這個身,眾生不乞求,自己也應當給與他,何況乞求了而不給!』菩薩摩訶薩修行般若波羅蜜,應當這樣學。
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩見到有乞求的人,應當生起這樣的念頭:『這其中是誰給與、誰領受?所布施的是什麼物?這一切法的自性都不可得,因為畢竟空的緣故;空相之法,沒有給與、沒有奪取。』為什麼呢?因為畢竟空的緣故,內空的緣故,外空、內外空、大空、第一義空、自相空的緣故。安住在這些空之中而行布施,這時候就具足檀波羅蜜。因為具足檀波羅蜜的緣故,若是斷截內外之法的時候,作這樣的念頭:『截斷我的是誰?割裂我的是誰?』
『再者,須菩提!我用佛眼見到東方如恒河沙那麼多的諸菩薩摩訶薩進入大地獄,令猛火熄滅、沸湯轉冷,以三件事教化眾生:一是神通,二是知他心,三是說法。這菩薩以神通之力,令大地獄的火熄滅、沸湯轉冷;知他人的心;以慈、悲、喜、捨,隨眾生之意而說法。這些眾生對菩薩生起清淨之心,從地獄得脫,漸漸以三乘之法而盡苦的邊際。南方、西方、北方、四維、上方、下方也是這樣。再者,須菩提!我用佛眼觀十方世界,見到如恒河沙那麼多的國土之中,有諸菩薩為諸佛作給使,供養諸佛,隨意愛樂恭敬;若是諸佛所說的法,都能領受奉持,乃至到阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,終究不會忘失。
『再者,須菩提!我用佛眼觀十方如恒河沙那麼多的國土之中,有諸菩薩摩訶薩為了畜生的緣故,捨棄自己的壽命,割截身體,分散到各方。凡有眾生吃了這些菩薩摩訶薩之肉的,都愛敬菩薩;因為愛敬的緣故,就得離開畜生道,值遇諸佛,聽聞佛說法,依所說而修行,漸漸以三乘——聲聞、辟支佛、佛法而於無餘涅槃之中般涅槃。像這樣,須菩提!諸菩薩摩訶薩所饒益的甚多——教化眾生令他們發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,依所說而修行,乃至於無餘涅槃之中般涅槃。
『再者,須菩提!我用佛眼見到十方如恒河沙那麼多的國土之中,有諸菩薩摩訶薩除去諸餓鬼的飢渴之苦,這些餓鬼都愛敬菩薩;因為愛敬的緣故,得離開餓鬼道,值遇諸佛,聽聞諸佛說法,依所說而修行,漸漸以三乘——聲聞、辟支佛、佛法而般涅槃,乃至無餘涅槃。像這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩為了度眾生的緣故,行大悲之心。
『再者,須菩提!我用佛眼見到諸菩薩摩訶薩在四天王天上說法,在三十三天、夜摩天、兜率陀天、化樂天、他化自在天上說法;諸天聽聞菩薩說法,漸漸以三乘而得滅度。須菩提!這些天眾之中有貪著五欲的,這菩薩就示現火起,燒他們的宮殿,而為他們說法,說這樣的話:『諸天!一切有為之法全都無常,誰能得安穩呢?』
『再者,須菩提!我用佛眼觀十方世界,見到如恒河沙那麼多的國土之中,有諸梵天執著於邪見,諸菩薩摩訶薩教他們遠離邪見,說這樣的話:『你們為什麼在空相虛妄的諸法之中而生起邪見?』像這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩安住大慈之心,為眾生說法。須菩提!這就是諸菩薩希有難及之法。
『再者,須菩提!我用佛眼觀十方世界如恒河沙那麼多的國土之中,諸菩薩摩訶薩以四件事攝取眾生。哪四件呢?布施、愛語、利益、同事。
『怎樣是菩薩以布施攝取眾生呢?須菩提!菩薩以二種布施攝取眾生:財施、法施。
『什麼是財施攝取眾生呢?須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩以金、銀、琉璃、頗梨、真珠、珂貝、珊瑚等種種寶物,或者以飲食、衣服、臥具、房舍、燈燭、華、香、瓔珞,或男、或女,或牛、羊、象、馬、車乘,或者以自己的身體,給施眾生;並且告訴眾生說:『你們若有所需要的,各自前來取用,就像取自己的東西一樣,不要有所疑難!』這菩薩布施之後,教他們受三歸依:歸依佛、歸依法、歸依僧;或者教他們受五戒,或者教他們受一日戒;或者教他們修初禪乃至教他們修非有想非無想定,或者教他們修慈、悲、喜、捨,或者教他們修念佛、念法、念僧、念戒、念捨、念天,或者教他們修不淨觀,或者教他們修安那般那觀,或者教相、或者教觸;或者教他們修四念處、四正勤、四如意足、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分,空三昧,無相三昧、無作三昧,八背捨、九次第定,佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、大慈大悲、三十二相、八十隨形好;或者教他們得須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果,或者教他們得辟支佛道,或者教他們得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。像這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩修行般若波羅蜜,以方便力教化眾生,行了財施之後,再教他們得無上安穩的涅槃。須菩提!這名為菩薩摩訶薩希有難及之法。
『須菩提!菩薩怎樣以法施攝取眾生呢?須菩提!法施有二種:一是世間的,二是出世間的。什麼是世間法施呢?敷陳演說、開顯指示世間之法,也就是不淨觀、安那般那念、四禪、四無量心、四無色定。像這樣的世間之法,以及其餘共凡夫所行之法,這名為世間法施。這菩薩這樣作了世間法施之後,以種種因緣教化他們,令他們遠離世間之法;遠離世間之法以後,以方便之力,令他們得聖無漏法以及聖無漏法的果。什麼是聖無漏法?什麼是聖無漏法的果?聖無漏法,就是三十七助道法、三解脫門。聖無漏法的果,就是須陀洹果乃至阿羅漢果,辟支佛道,阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩的聖無漏法:須陀洹果之中的智慧乃至阿羅漢果之中的智慧、辟支佛道之中的智慧、三十七助道法之中的智慧、六波羅蜜之中的智慧乃至大慈大悲之中的智慧——像這樣的一切法,或世間或出世間的智慧、或有漏或無漏、或有為或無為,在這些法之中的一切種智,這名為菩薩摩訶薩的聖無漏法。什麼是聖無漏法的果呢?斷除一切煩惱習氣,這名為聖無漏法的果。』
須菩提向佛稟白:『世尊!菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智嗎?』
佛說:『是這樣!是這樣!須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智。』
須菩提說:『菩薩與佛有什麼差異呢?』
佛說:『有差異。菩薩摩訶薩得了一切種智,就名為佛。為什麼呢?因為菩薩之心與佛之心沒有差異。菩薩安住在這一切種智之中,對於一切法沒有不照明的,這名為菩薩摩訶薩的世間法施。須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩因為世間法施,而得出世間法施。像這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩教眾生令他們得世間之法以後,以方便之力教他們令得出世間之法。
『須菩提!什麼是菩薩出世間之法、不與凡夫之法相同的呢?也就是四念處、四正勤、四如意足、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分,三解脫門、八背捨、九次第定,佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、三十二相、八十隨形好,五百陀羅尼門,這名為出世間之法。
『須菩提!怎樣是四念處呢?菩薩摩訶薩觀內身循身而觀、觀外身循身而觀、觀內外身循身而觀,勤加精進,以一心的智慧觀身、觀身集起的因緣、觀身的滅、觀身的集與生滅;修行這道,沒有所依,對於世間沒有所愛。受念處、心念處、法念處,也是這樣。
『須菩提!怎樣是四正勤呢?還沒有生起的惡不善之法,為了不使它生起,勤加用功、生起欲樂、精進;已經生起的惡不善之法,為了斷除它,勤加用功、生起欲樂、精進;還沒有生起的善法,為了使它生起,勤加用功、生起欲樂、精進;已經生起的諸善法,為了增長修習使它具足,勤加用功、生起欲樂、精進;這名為四正勤。
『須菩提!怎樣是四如意足呢?欲三昧斷行成就的初如意足,精進三昧、心三昧、思惟三昧斷行成就的如意足。
『怎樣是五根呢?信根、精進根、念根、定根、慧根。
『怎樣是五力呢?信力、精進力、念力、定力、慧力。
『怎樣是七覺分呢?念覺分、擇法覺分、精進覺分、喜覺分、除息覺分、定覺分、捨覺分。
『怎樣是八聖道分呢?正見、正思惟、正語、正業、正命、正精進、正念、正定。
『怎樣是三三昧呢?空三昧門,無相三昧門、無作三昧門。怎樣是空三昧呢?以空行、無我行攝持其心,這名為空三昧。怎樣是無相三昧呢?以寂滅行、離行攝持其心,這是無相三昧。怎樣是無作三昧呢?以無常行、苦行攝持其心,這是無作三昧。
『怎樣是八背捨呢?內有色相而外觀色,這是初背捨;內沒有色相而外觀色,這是第二背捨;淨背捨,這是第三背捨;超過一切色相,滅除一切對礙之相,不念一切異相的緣故,觀無邊虛空,入無邊空處;乃至超過一切非有想非無想處,入滅受想背捨。這名為八背捨。
『怎樣是九次第定呢?修行的人離開欲、離開惡不善之法,有覺有觀,由離而生喜樂,入初禪;第二禪、第三禪、第四禪;乃至超過非有想非無想處,入滅受想定。這名為九次第定。
『怎樣是佛十力呢?是處與不是處,如實知道;知道眾生過去、未來、現在的諸業、諸受法,知道造業之處,知道因緣,知道果報;諸禪定、解脫、三昧、定的垢淨分別之相,如實知道;知道其他眾生諸根的上下之相;知道其他眾生種種的欲樂與勝解;知道一切世間種種無數的性;知道一切到道之相;知道種種宿命,從一世乃至無量劫,如實知道;以天眼見眾生,乃至生在善道惡道;因為漏盡的緣故,無漏的心解脫,如實知道。這是佛十力。
『怎樣是佛四無所畏呢?佛作誠實之言:『我是一切正智之人。』若有沙門、婆羅門,或天、或魔、或梵、或其餘的大眾如實地說:『這法你不知道。』乃至不見有這微細的可畏之相。『因為這個緣故,我得安穩、得無所畏,安住在聖主之處,在大眾之中作師子吼,能轉梵輪;諸沙門、婆羅門,或天、或魔、或梵、或其餘的大眾實在不能轉。』這是第一無畏。佛作誠實之言:『我一切漏已盡。』若有沙門、婆羅門,或天、或魔、或梵、或其餘的大眾如實地說:『這漏還沒有盡。』乃至不見有這微細的可畏之相。『因為這個緣故,我得安穩、得無所畏,安住在聖主之處,在大眾之中作師子吼,能轉梵輪;諸沙門、婆羅門,或天、或魔、或梵、或其餘的大眾實在不能轉。』這是第二無畏。佛作誠實之言:『我宣說障道之法。』若有沙門、婆羅門,或天、或魔、或梵、或其餘的大眾如實地說:『受這法並不障道。』乃至不見有這微細的可畏之相。『因為這個緣故,我得安穩、得無所畏,安住在聖主之處,在大眾之中作師子吼,能轉梵輪;諸沙門、婆羅門,或天、或魔、或梵、或其餘的大眾實在不能轉。』這是第三無畏。佛作誠實之言:『我所說的聖道,能出離世間;隨這道而行,能盡諸苦。』若有沙門、婆羅門,或天、或魔、或梵、或其餘的大眾如實地說:『行這道不能出離世間、不能盡苦。』乃至不見有這微細的可畏之相。『因為這個緣故,我得安穩、得無所畏,安住在聖主之處,在大眾之中作師子吼,能轉梵輪;諸沙門、婆羅門,或天、或魔、或梵、或其餘的大眾實在不能轉。』這是第四無畏。
『怎樣是四無礙智呢?一是義無礙智,二是法無礙智,三是辭無礙智,四是樂說無礙智。怎樣是義無礙智呢?緣義的智慧,這是義無礙智。怎樣是法無礙智呢?緣法的智慧,這是法無礙智。怎樣是辭無礙智呢?緣辭的智慧,這是辭無礙智。怎樣是樂說無礙智呢?緣樂說的智慧,這是樂說無礙智。
『怎樣是十八不共法呢?一是諸佛身無過失,二是口無過失,三是念無過失,四是沒有異想,五是沒有不定之心,六是沒有不知已捨之心,七是欲無減,八是精進無減,九是念無減,十是慧無減,十一是解脫無減,十二是解脫知見無減,十三是一切身業隨智慧而行,十四是一切口業隨智慧而行,十五是一切意業隨智慧而行,十六是智慧知過去世無礙,十七是智慧知未來世無礙,十八是智慧知現在世無礙。
『怎樣是三十二相呢?一是腳掌安平而立,平得如同奩盒之底;二是腳掌有千輻輞輪,輪相具足;三是手指腳趾長,勝過其餘的人;四是手足柔軟,勝過身上其餘的部分;五是腳跟寬廣,具足圓滿美好;六是手指腳趾之間合有縵網,勝過其餘的人;七是腳背高平美好,與腳跟相稱;八是伊泥延鹿一般的腿脛,腿脛纖好,如同伊泥延鹿王;九是平常站立時兩手能摩到膝;十是陰藏之相,如同馬王、象王;十一是身的縱橫相等,如同尼俱盧樹;十二是一一毛孔各生一毛,色青、柔軟、右旋;十三是身毛上向,青色柔軟右旋;十四是金色之相,其色微妙,勝過閻浮檀金;十五是身光四面各一丈;十六是皮薄細滑,不受塵垢,蚊蜹不停留;十七是七處平滿:兩腳掌下、兩手掌中、兩肩之上、頸項之中都圓滿,字相分明;十八是兩腋之下平滿;十九是上身如同師子;二十是身廣而端直;二十一是兩肩圓好;二十二是四十顆牙齒;二十三是牙齒潔白齊密而根深;二十四是四顆牙最白而大;二十五是方正的頰車如同師子;二十六是諸味之中能得上味,咽中二處有津液流出;二十七是舌大、柔軟、薄,能覆滿面門直到耳的髮際;二十八是梵音深遠,如同迦蘭頻伽之聲;二十九是眼色如同金精;三十是眼睫如同牛王;三十一是眉間的白毫之相,柔軟潔白如同兜羅綿;三十二是頂上的髻由肉所成。這三十二相,是佛身所成就的。
『光明遍照三千大千世界,若是想要廣照,就遍滿十方無量阿僧祇世界,為眾生的緣故而受一丈之光;若是放無量光明,就沒有日月、時節、歲數可言了。佛的音聲遍滿三千大千世界,若是想要大聲,就遍滿十方無量阿僧祇世界;隨大眾的多少,音聲普遍而至。』
This chapter is titled the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa's commentary on the seventy-eighth chapter, "The Four Means of Gathering", composed by the noble Nāgārjuna and translated by the Tripiṭaka master Kumārajīva of the land of Kucha under the Later Qin; it is in the eighty-eighth fascicle. What the single unit of the First Part explains is the earlier part of the sūtra text of this chapter.
Sūtra ①: Subhūti Asks How Dharmas Are Distinguished within Ultimate Emptiness—the Buddha Answers That Ordinary People Still Give Rise to the Three Kinds of Deeds within Dreams and Conjurations, and That the Bodhisattva, Abiding in the Two Emptinesses, Teaches the Dharma and by the Power of Skilful Means Pulls Beings Out in Sequence; Subhūti Praises the Rare and Hard to Equal, and the Buddha Consents to Speak of the Bodhisattva's Dharma Rare and Hard to Equal; Abiding in the Six Perfections and the Five Supernormal Powers Obtained as Retribution, He Gathers In according to What Is Fitting; One and the Same Giving That Benefits Beings, Not Making the Discrimination of Fields of Merit, Not Giving Rise to Two Minds When His Body Is Begged, and Making Dānapāramitā Complete within Ultimate Emptiness; the Six Ways in Which the Bodhisattvas of the Ten Directions Seen by the Buddha-eye Benefit the Living; Gathering In by the Four Things, and the Two Gifts of Wealth and Dharma within Giving; the Noble Dharma without Outflows and Its Fruit; Whether the Bodhisattva Obtains the Omniscience of All Kinds, and How the Bodhisattva Differs from the Buddha; the World-transcending Dharmas Not Shared with Ordinary People, Item by Item up to the Thirty-two Marks, and the Light and the Voice Pervading Everywhere
Subhūti said to the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! If all dharmas are like a dream, like an echo, like a shadow, like a mirage, like an illusion, like a conjuration, without real substance, without any existent nature, and empty in their specific marks, then how is it distinguished that this is a wholesome dharma, this is an unwholesome dharma; this is a worldly dharma, this is a world-transcending dharma; this is a dharma with outflows, this is a dharma without outflows; this is a conditioned dharma, this is an unconditioned dharma; that this dharma can obtain the fruit of the srota-āpanna, can obtain the fruit of the sakṛdāgāmin, the fruit of the anāgāmin, the fruit of the arhat, can obtain the path of the pratyekabuddha, can obtain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi?’
The Buddha told Subhūti: ‘Ordinary foolish people find the dream and find the one who sees the dream, and so on up to finding the conjuration and finding the one who sees the conjuration, and give rise to wholesome deeds, unwholesome deeds, and indeterminate deeds of body, speech, and mind; they give rise to deeds of merit, or give rise to deeds of sin, or do immovable deeds. This bodhisattva-mahāsattva, practising prajñāpāramitā, abides in the two emptinesses—ultimate emptiness and beginningless emptiness—and teaches the Dharma for beings, saying these words: ‘All you beings! This form is empty and without anything existent; feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness are empty and without anything existent; the twelve sense-fields and the eighteen elements are empty and without anything existent. Form is a dream; feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness are a dream; the twelve sense-fields and the eighteen elements are a dream. Form is an echo, is a shadow, is a mirage, is an illusion, is a conjuration; feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness are also like this. The twelve sense-fields and the eighteen elements are a dream, are an echo, are a shadow, are a mirage, are an illusion, are a conjuration. Within this there are no aggregates, no sense-fields, no elements; there is no dream and also no one who sees the dream, no echo and also no one who hears the echo, no shadow and also no one who sees the shadow, no mirage and also no one who sees the mirage, no illusion and also no one who sees the illusion, no conjuration and also no one who sees the conjuration. All dharmas are without root, without real nature, without anything existent, yet you, within what has no aggregates, see that there are aggregates; within what has no sense-fields, see that there are sense-fields; within what has no elements, see that there are elements. All these dharmas arise from the coming together of causes and conditions, arise from an inverted mind, and belong to the retribution of deeds; why do you, within dharmas that are empty and without root, grasp at the root-mark?’
‘At this time the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, practising prajñāpāramitā, by reason of the power of skilful means pulls beings out from the dharma of stinginess and teaches them to practise dānapāramitā; by the merit of holding to this giving, they obtain a great reward of merit. Again he pulls them out from the great reward of merit and teaches them to keep morality; by the merit of keeping morality they are born in a noble place among the gods. Again he pulls them out once more and makes them abide in the first dhyāna; by the merit of the first dhyāna they are born in the place of Brahmā. The second dhyāna, the third dhyāna, the fourth dhyāna, the sphere of boundless space, the sphere of boundless consciousness, the sphere of nothing whatsoever, and the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception are also like this. Beings practise this giving and the retribution of giving, keeping morality and the retribution of keeping morality, meditative concentration and the retribution of meditative concentration; by all kinds of causes and conditions he pulls them out and sets them in nirvāṇa without remainder and in the path to nirvāṇa, namely the four foundations of mindfulness, the four right efforts, the four bases of supernormal power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven limbs of awakening, the eightfold noble path; the gate of liberation of emptiness, the gate of liberation of signlessness, the gate of liberation of non-action; the eight liberations, the nine successive absorptions; the Buddha's ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, the eighteen unshared dharmas; he makes beings secure and makes them abide in the noble dharma without outflows—the dharma without form, without shape, without resistance. Those who can obtain the fruit of the srota-āpanna he securely teaches and transforms, and makes them abide in the fruit of the srota-āpanna; those who can obtain the fruit of the sakṛdāgāmin, the fruit of the anāgāmin, the fruit of the arhat, the path of the pratyekabuddha, he makes abide in the fruit of the sakṛdāgāmin, the fruit of the anāgāmin, the fruit of the arhat, the path of the pratyekabuddha; those who can obtain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi he also securely teaches and transforms, and makes them abide within anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi.’
Subhūti said to the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! The bodhisattva-mahāsattvas are very rare and hard to equal: they can practise this deep prajñāpāramitā, where dharmas are without any existent nature, are ultimate emptiness and beginningless emptiness, and yet they can still distinguish dharmas as wholesome, as unwholesome, as with outflows, as without outflows, and so on up to as conditioned, as unconditioned.’
The Buddha told Subhūti: ‘Just so! Just so! The bodhisattva-mahāsattvas are very rare and hard to equal: they can practise this deep prajñāpāramitā, where dharmas are without any existent nature, are ultimate emptiness and beginningless emptiness, and yet they can still distinguish dharmas. Subhūti! If you know this dharma of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, rare and hard to equal, then you know that no śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha can requite it, how much less other people!’
Subhūti said to the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! What is the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's dharma, rare and hard to equal, that the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas do not have?’
The Buddha told Subhūti: ‘Listen attentively with one mind! There are bodhisattva-mahāsattvas who practise prajñāpāramitā, abide in the six perfections obtained as retribution, and abide in the five supernormal powers and the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path obtained as retribution, abide in the dhāraṇīs and the unobstructed knowledges, and go to the worlds of the ten directions: those who can be delivered by giving, he takes in by giving; those who can be delivered by keeping morality, he takes in by keeping morality; those who can be delivered by patience, vigour, meditative concentration, and wisdom, he gathers them in according to what is fitting. Those who can be delivered by the first dhyāna, he gathers them in by the first dhyāna; those who can be delivered by the second dhyāna, the third dhyāna, the fourth dhyāna, the sphere of boundless space, the sphere of boundless consciousness, the sphere of nothing whatsoever, or the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception, he gathers them in according to what is fitting. Those who can be delivered by minds of kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity, he gathers them in by minds of kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity. Those who can be delivered by the four foundations of mindfulness, the four right efforts, the four bases of supernormal power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven limbs of awakening, the eightfold noble path, the emptiness samādhi, the signless samādhi, or the non-action samādhi, he gathers them in according to what is fitting.’
‘World-Honored One! How does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva benefit beings by giving?’
‘Subhūti! When the bodhisattva practises prajñāpāramitā he practises giving, and according to what each needs—food and drink, clothing, carriages and horses, incense and flowers, necklaces, all kinds of things needed—he gives it all to him. Whether he makes offerings to the Buddha, the pratyekabuddha, the arhat, the anāgāmin, the sakṛdāgāmin, the srota-āpanna, and so on, there is no difference; whether he gives to people who have already entered the right path or to ordinary people, down to birds and beasts, there is no discrimination at all: equally, it is one and the same giving. Why? Because all dharmas are not different and without discrimination. This bodhisattva, having given without difference and without distinction, will obtain the retribution of the dharma without discrimination, namely the omniscience of all kinds. Subhūti! If the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, seeing one who begs, gives rise to such a mind: ‘The Buddha is a field of merit, I should make offerings; birds and beasts are not a field of merit, I should not make offerings.’ This is not the bodhisattva's dharma. Why? The bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has aroused the mind of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi does not have such a thought: ‘This being should be benefited by giving; this being should not be given to.’ This being, by the causes and conditions of giving, should be born in a great kṣatriya clan, a great brahmin clan, a great householder family, and so on up to: by the causes and conditions of this giving, he delivers him by the Dharma of the three vehicles and makes him enter nirvāṇa without remainder. If a being comes and begs from the bodhisattva, he also does not give rise to a different mind that discriminates: ‘I should give to this one, I should not give to that one.’ Why? Because this bodhisattva aroused the mind of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi precisely for the sake of this being; if he discriminates and picks and chooses, he falls into the place of rebuke by the buddhas, the bodhisattvas, the pratyekabuddhas, those in training and those beyond training, and all the gods and humans of the world: ‘Who asked you to rescue all beings? You are the house of all beings, the protection of all beings, the refuge of all beings, and yet you discriminate and pick and choose whom you should give to and whom you should not give to?’
‘Again, if, when the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is practising prajñāpāramitā, a human or a non-human comes wishing to beg for the limbs and joints of the bodhisattva's body, at that time he should not give rise to two minds: ‘Shall I give? Or shall I not give?’ Why? Because this bodhisattva-mahāsattva receives this body for the sake of beings; when beings come to take it, how can he not give? ‘I receive this body for the sake of benefiting beings; even if beings do not beg, I myself should give it to them, how much less may I not give when they have begged!’ The bodhisattva-mahāsattva practising prajñāpāramitā should train thus.
‘Again, Subhūti! When the bodhisattva-mahāsattva sees one who begs, he should give rise to this thought: ‘Who here gives, who receives? What thing is given? The self-nature of all these dharmas is unfindable, because of ultimate emptiness; in the dharma of the mark of emptiness there is no giving and no taking away.’ Why? Because of ultimate emptiness, because of inner emptiness, because of outer emptiness, inner-and-outer emptiness, great emptiness, the emptiness of the highest meaning, and the emptiness of specific marks. Abiding in these emptinesses he practises giving, and at that time he makes dānapāramitā complete. Because he makes dānapāramitā complete, if, at the time when inner and outer dharmas are cut off and severed, he has this thought: ‘Who is it that cuts me off? Who is it that severs me?’
‘Again, Subhūti! With the Buddha-eye I see bodhisattva-mahāsattvas as many as the sands of the Ganges in the eastern direction entering the great hells, making the fierce fire go out and the boiling water grow cold, and teaching and transforming beings by three things: first, supernormal power; second, knowing others' minds; third, teaching the Dharma. This bodhisattva by the power of supernormal power makes the fire of the great hells go out and the boiling water grow cold; he knows the minds of others; with kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity he teaches the Dharma according to the intent of beings. These beings give rise to a pure mind toward the bodhisattva, gain release from the hells, and little by little, by the Dharma of the three vehicles, reach the end of suffering. The southern, western, and northern directions, the four intermediate directions, the direction above, and the direction below are also like this. Again, Subhūti! With the Buddha-eye I look upon the worlds of the ten directions and see, in lands as many as the sands of the Ganges, bodhisattvas serving as attendants to the buddhas, making offerings to the buddhas, loving, delighting in, and revering them according to their wishes; whatever Dharma the buddhas teach, they can all receive and uphold, and so on up to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, never in the end forgetting or losing it.
‘Again, Subhūti! With the Buddha-eye I look upon lands as many as the sands of the Ganges in the ten directions, and in them there are bodhisattva-mahāsattvas who, for the sake of animals, give up their own lives, cut and sever their bodies, and scatter them in all directions. All beings who eat the flesh of these bodhisattva-mahāsattvas love and revere the bodhisattvas; because of this love and reverence, they get to leave the animal destiny, meet the buddhas, hear the Buddha teach the Dharma, practise according to what is taught, and little by little, by the three vehicles—the śrāvaka, the pratyekabuddha, and the Buddha's Dharma—attain parinirvāṇa within nirvāṇa without remainder. Thus, Subhūti! the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas benefit very much—teaching and transforming beings, making them arouse the mind of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, practise according to what is taught, and so on up to attain parinirvāṇa within nirvāṇa without remainder.
‘Again, Subhūti! With the Buddha-eye I see, in lands as many as the sands of the Ganges in the ten directions, bodhisattva-mahāsattvas removing the suffering of hunger and thirst of the hungry ghosts; these hungry ghosts all love and revere the bodhisattvas; because of this love and reverence, they get to leave the hungry-ghost destiny, meet the buddhas, hear the buddhas teach the Dharma, practise according to what is taught, and little by little, by the three vehicles—the śrāvaka, the pratyekabuddha, and the Buddha's Dharma—attain parinirvāṇa, and so on up to nirvāṇa without remainder. Thus, Subhūti! the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, for the sake of delivering beings, practises the mind of great compassion.
‘Again, Subhūti! With the Buddha-eye I see bodhisattva-mahāsattvas teaching the Dharma in the Heaven of the Four Heavenly Kings, and teaching the Dharma in the Heaven of the Thirty-three, the Yāma heaven, the Tuṣita heaven, the Heaven of Delight in Transformation, and the heaven of the gods Sovereign over Others' Transformations; the gods, hearing the bodhisattvas teach the Dharma, little by little, by the three vehicles, attain passing into extinction. Subhūti! Among these assemblies of gods there are those who crave and cling to the five desires; this bodhisattva then shows a fire arising and burning their palaces, and teaches the Dharma for them, saying these words: ‘Gods! All conditioned dharmas are wholly impermanent; who can obtain security?’
‘Again, Subhūti! With the Buddha-eye I look upon the worlds of the ten directions and see, in lands as many as the sands of the Ganges, Brahmā gods clinging to wrong views; the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas teach them to be far from wrong views, saying these words: ‘Why do you give rise to wrong views within dharmas whose mark is empty and which are false?’ Thus, Subhūti! the bodhisattva-mahāsattva abides in the mind of great kindness and teaches the Dharma for beings. Subhūti! This is the bodhisattvas' dharma, rare and hard to equal.
‘Again, Subhūti! With the Buddha-eye I look upon lands as many as the sands of the Ganges in the worlds of the ten directions, and the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas gather in beings by four things. What are the four? Giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour.
‘How does the bodhisattva gather in beings by giving? Subhūti! The bodhisattva gathers in beings by two kinds of giving: the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma.
‘What is gathering in beings by the gift of wealth? Subhūti! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva gives to beings all kinds of precious things—gold, silver, beryl, sphaṭika, pearls, conch-shell, coral, and so forth—or food and drink, clothing, bedding, dwellings, lamps and candles, flowers, incense, necklaces, or men, or women, or oxen, sheep, elephants, horses, carriages, or his own body; and he tells beings: ‘If you have any need, each of you come and take it, as if taking your own things; have no hesitation!’ This bodhisattva, having given, teaches them to take the three refuges: taking refuge in the Buddha, taking refuge in the Dharma, taking refuge in the Saṅgha; or teaches them to take the five precepts, or teaches them to take the one-day precepts; or teaches them to cultivate the first dhyāna and so on up to teaching them to cultivate the absorption of neither perception nor non-perception, or teaches them to cultivate kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity, or teaches them to cultivate recollection of the Buddha, recollection of the Dharma, recollection of the Saṅgha, recollection of morality, recollection of giving, and recollection of the gods, or teaches them to cultivate the contemplation of impurity, or teaches them to cultivate the ānāpāna contemplation, or teaches the marks, or teaches contact; or teaches them to cultivate the four foundations of mindfulness, the four right efforts, the four bases of supernormal power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven limbs of awakening, the eightfold noble path, the emptiness samādhi, the signless samādhi, the non-action samādhi, the eight liberations, the nine successive absorptions, the Buddha's ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, the eighteen unshared dharmas, great kindness and great compassion, the thirty-two marks, the eighty minor marks; or teaches them to obtain the fruit of the srota-āpanna, the fruit of the sakṛdāgāmin, the fruit of the anāgāmin, the fruit of the arhat, or teaches them to obtain the path of the pratyekabuddha, or teaches them to obtain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. Thus, Subhūti! the bodhisattva-mahāsattva practising prajñāpāramitā teaches and transforms beings by the power of skilful means; having practised the gift of wealth, he further teaches them to obtain the unsurpassed nirvāṇa of peace and security. Subhūti! This is named the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's dharma, rare and hard to equal.
‘Subhūti! How does the bodhisattva gather in beings by the gift of Dharma? Subhūti! The gift of Dharma is of two kinds: first, worldly; second, world-transcending. What is the worldly gift of Dharma? Setting forth and expounding, disclosing and pointing out worldly dharmas, namely the contemplation of impurity, mindfulness of ānāpāna, the four dhyānas, the four immeasurable minds, and the four formless absorptions. Such worldly dharmas as these, and the other dharmas practised in common with ordinary people—this is named the worldly gift of Dharma. This bodhisattva, having made the worldly gift of Dharma thus, teaches and transforms them by all kinds of causes and conditions and makes them far from worldly dharmas; having been brought far from worldly dharmas, by the power of skilful means he makes them obtain the noble dharma without outflows and the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows. What is the noble dharma without outflows? What is the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows? The noble dharma without outflows is the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path and the three gates of liberation. The fruit of the noble dharma without outflows is the fruit of the srota-āpanna and so on up to the fruit of the arhat, the path of the pratyekabuddha, and anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi.
‘Again, Subhūti! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva's noble dharma without outflows: the wisdom within the fruit of the srota-āpanna and so on up to the wisdom within the fruit of the arhat, the wisdom within the path of the pratyekabuddha, the wisdom within the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path, the wisdom within the six perfections and so on up to the wisdom within great kindness and great compassion—all such dharmas as these, whether worldly or world-transcending wisdom, whether with outflows or without outflows, whether conditioned or unconditioned: the omniscience of all kinds within these dharmas—this is named the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's noble dharma without outflows. What is the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows? Cutting off all the afflictions and their habitual residues—this is named the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows.’
Subhūti said to the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! Does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva obtain the omniscience of all kinds?’
The Buddha said: ‘Just so! Just so! Subhūti! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva obtains the omniscience of all kinds.’
Subhūti said: ‘What difference is there between the bodhisattva and the Buddha?’
The Buddha said: ‘There is a difference. The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, having obtained the omniscience of all kinds, is named Buddha. Why? Because the bodhisattva's mind and the Buddha's mind are without difference. The bodhisattva abides within this omniscience of all kinds, and there is nothing among all dharmas that he does not illumine; this is named the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's worldly gift of Dharma. Subhūti! Because of the worldly gift of Dharma the bodhisattva-mahāsattva obtains the world-transcending gift of Dharma. Thus, Subhūti! the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, having taught beings and made them obtain worldly dharmas, by the power of skilful means teaches them and makes them obtain world-transcending dharmas.
‘Subhūti! What are the bodhisattva's world-transcending dharmas, not the same as the dharmas of ordinary people? Namely the four foundations of mindfulness, the four right efforts, the four bases of supernormal power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven limbs of awakening, the eightfold noble path, the three gates of liberation, the eight liberations, the nine successive absorptions, the Buddha's ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, the eighteen unshared dharmas, the thirty-two marks, the eighty minor marks, and the five hundred dhāraṇī gates; these are named world-transcending dharmas.
‘Subhūti! What are the four foundations of mindfulness? The bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates the inner body, contemplating by following the body through; contemplates the outer body, contemplating by following the body through; contemplates the inner-and-outer body, contemplating by following the body through; diligently and with vigour, with the wisdom of a single mind, he contemplates the body, contemplates the causes and conditions of the body's arising, contemplates the cessation of the body, contemplates the arising of the body together with its birth and cessation; practising this path, he has nothing he relies on, and toward the world he has nothing he craves. The foundation of mindfulness of feeling, the foundation of mindfulness of mind, and the foundation of mindfulness of dharmas are also like this.
‘Subhūti! What are the four right efforts? For evil and unwholesome dharmas not yet arisen, in order that they not arise, he strives diligently, gives rise to desire, and is vigorous; for evil and unwholesome dharmas already arisen, in order to cut them off, he strives diligently, gives rise to desire, and is vigorous; for wholesome dharmas not yet arisen, in order that they arise, he strives diligently, gives rise to desire, and is vigorous; for the wholesome dharmas already arisen, in order to increase them, cultivate them, and make them complete, he strives diligently, gives rise to desire, and is vigorous; this is named the four right efforts.
‘Subhūti! What are the four bases of supernormal power? The first basis of supernormal power, accomplished by the samādhi of desire and the practice of cutting off; and the bases of supernormal power accomplished by the samādhi of vigour, the samādhi of mind, and the samādhi of reflection and the practice of cutting off.
‘What are the five faculties? The faculty of faith, the faculty of vigour, the faculty of mindfulness, the faculty of concentration, the faculty of wisdom.
‘What are the five powers? The power of faith, the power of vigour, the power of mindfulness, the power of concentration, the power of wisdom.
‘What are the seven limbs of awakening? The mindfulness limb of awakening, the limb of awakening that investigates dharmas, the vigour limb of awakening, the joy limb of awakening, the removal-and-rest limb of awakening, the concentration limb of awakening, the equanimity limb of awakening.
‘What is the eightfold noble path? Right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right vigour, right mindfulness, right concentration.
‘What are the three samādhi? The gate of the emptiness samādhi, the gate of the signless samādhi, the gate of the non-action samādhi. What is the emptiness samādhi? Holding the mind by the practice of emptiness and the practice of non-self—this is named the emptiness samādhi. What is the signless samādhi? Holding the mind by the practice of quiescent extinction and the practice of separation—this is the signless samādhi. What is the non-action samādhi? Holding the mind by the practice of impermanence and the practice of suffering—this is the non-action samādhi.
‘What are the eight liberations? Having the mark of form within, he contemplates form without—this is the first liberation; not having the mark of form within, he contemplates form without—this is the second liberation; the liberation of purity—this is the third liberation; passing beyond all marks of form, eliminating all marks of resistance, and because of not thinking of all different marks, he contemplates boundless space and enters the sphere of boundless space; and so on up to passing beyond all of the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception, he enters the liberation of the cessation of feeling and perception. This is named the eight liberations.
‘What are the nine successive absorptions? The practitioner, having parted from desires and parted from evil and unwholesome dharmas, with initial thought and with sustained thought, with joy and pleasure born of separation, enters the first dhyāna; the second dhyāna, the third dhyāna, the fourth dhyāna; and so on up to passing beyond the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception, he enters the absorption of the cessation of feeling and perception. This is named the nine successive absorptions.
‘What are the Buddha's ten powers? What can be and what cannot be, he knows as it really is; he knows the various deeds and the various dharmas of receiving of beings in the past, future, and present, knows the place where deeds are done, knows their causes and conditions, knows their retribution; the marks of defilement, purity, and distinction of the meditative concentrations, liberations, samādhi, and absorptions, he knows as it really is; he knows the higher and lower marks of the faculties of other beings; he knows the various desires and resolute understandings of other beings; he knows the various innumerable natures of all the world; he knows the marks of all the paths that lead everywhere; he knows all kinds of former lives, from one life up to immeasurable kalpas, as it really is; with the divine eye he sees beings, and so on up to their being born in good destinies and evil destinies; because the outflows are exhausted, the mind without outflows is liberated, and he knows this as it really is. These are the Buddha's ten powers.
‘What are the Buddha's four fearlessnesses? The Buddha makes a truthful declaration: ‘I am a person of all right knowledge.’ If there is a śramaṇa or a brahmin, or a god, or Māra, or Brahmā, or any other assembly that says in accordance with fact: ‘This dharma you do not know.’ and so on up to his not seeing even the slightest mark of anything to fear. ‘For this reason I obtain security and obtain fearlessness, abide in the place of the holy lord, roar the lion's roar in the great assembly, and can turn the Brahmā wheel; the śramaṇas and brahmins, or gods, or Māra, or Brahmā, or any other assembly truly cannot turn it.’ This is the first fearlessness. The Buddha makes a truthful declaration: ‘All my outflows are exhausted.’ If there is a śramaṇa or a brahmin, or a god, or Māra, or Brahmā, or any other assembly that says in accordance with fact: ‘These outflows are not yet exhausted.’ and so on up to his not seeing even the slightest mark of anything to fear. ‘For this reason I obtain security and obtain fearlessness, abide in the place of the holy lord, roar the lion's roar in the great assembly, and can turn the Brahmā wheel; the śramaṇas and brahmins, or gods, or Māra, or Brahmā, or any other assembly truly cannot turn it.’ This is the second fearlessness. The Buddha makes a truthful declaration: ‘I proclaim the dharmas that obstruct the path.’ If there is a śramaṇa or a brahmin, or a god, or Māra, or Brahmā, or any other assembly that says in accordance with fact: ‘Receiving this dharma does not obstruct the path.’ and so on up to his not seeing even the slightest mark of anything to fear. ‘For this reason I obtain security and obtain fearlessness, abide in the place of the holy lord, roar the lion's roar in the great assembly, and can turn the Brahmā wheel; the śramaṇas and brahmins, or gods, or Māra, or Brahmā, or any other assembly truly cannot turn it.’ This is the third fearlessness. The Buddha makes a truthful declaration: ‘The holy path that I teach can lead out of the world; practising in accordance with this path, one can bring all suffering to an end.’ If there is a śramaṇa or a brahmin, or a god, or Māra, or Brahmā, or any other assembly that says in accordance with fact: ‘Practising this path one cannot leave the world and cannot bring suffering to an end.’ and so on up to his not seeing even the slightest mark of anything to fear. ‘For this reason I obtain security and obtain fearlessness, abide in the place of the holy lord, roar the lion's roar in the great assembly, and can turn the Brahmā wheel; the śramaṇas and brahmins, or gods, or Māra, or Brahmā, or any other assembly truly cannot turn it.’ This is the fourth fearlessness.
‘What are the four unobstructed knowledges? First, the unobstructed knowledge of meaning; second, the unobstructed knowledge of dharmas; third, the unobstructed knowledge of expression; fourth, the unobstructed knowledge of delight in speaking. What is the unobstructed knowledge of meaning? The wisdom that takes meaning as its object—this is the unobstructed knowledge of meaning. What is the unobstructed knowledge of dharmas? The wisdom that takes dharmas as its object—this is the unobstructed knowledge of dharmas. What is the unobstructed knowledge of expression? The wisdom that takes expression as its object—this is the unobstructed knowledge of expression. What is the unobstructed knowledge of delight in speaking? The wisdom that takes delight in speaking as its object—this is the unobstructed knowledge of delight in speaking.
‘What are the eighteen unshared dharmas? First, the bodies of the buddhas are without fault; second, speech is without fault; third, mindfulness is without fault; fourth, there are no different perceptions; fifth, there is no unconcentrated mind; sixth, there is no mind that lets go without knowing; seventh, desire is without decline; eighth, vigour is without decline; ninth, mindfulness is without decline; tenth, wisdom is without decline; eleventh, liberation is without decline; twelfth, the knowledge and vision of liberation is without decline; thirteenth, all bodily deeds proceed following wisdom; fourteenth, all deeds of speech proceed following wisdom; fifteenth, all mental deeds proceed following wisdom; sixteenth, wisdom knows the past world without obstruction; seventeenth, wisdom knows the future world without obstruction; eighteenth, wisdom knows the present world without obstruction.
‘What are the thirty-two marks? First, the soles of the feet stand level and even, as level as the bottom of a casket; second, under the soles of the feet are thousand-spoked wheels with rims, the wheel-marks complete; third, the fingers and toes are long, surpassing other people; fourth, the hands and feet are soft, surpassing the other parts of the body; fifth, the heels are broad, complete, round, full, and fine; sixth, between the fingers and toes there is webbing, surpassing other people; seventh, the insteps are high, level, and fine, matching the heels; eighth, shanks like those of the yiniyan deer, the shanks slender and fine, like the king of the yiniyan deer; ninth, when standing ordinarily, both hands can touch the knees; tenth, the mark of the hidden private parts, like a horse-king or an elephant-king; eleventh, the body's height and breadth are equal, like the nijulu tree; twelfth, from each single pore a single hair grows, blue in colour, soft, and turning to the right; thirteenth, the body hairs point upward, blue in colour, soft, and turning to the right; fourteenth, the golden-coloured mark, its colour subtle and wonderful, surpassing jambūnada gold; fifteenth, the light of the body extends one zhang on each of the four sides; sixteenth, the skin is thin, fine, and smooth, receiving no dust or dirt, and mosquitoes and gnats do not settle on it; seventeenth, the seven places are level and full: under both soles, in both palms, on both shoulders, and in the middle of the neck, all are round and full, and the letter-marks distinct; eighteenth, under both armpits level and full; nineteenth, the upper body like a lion; twentieth, the body broad and upright; twenty-first, both shoulders round and fine; twenty-second, forty teeth; twenty-third, the teeth white, even, close-set, and deep-rooted; twenty-fourth, four teeth whitest and large; twenty-fifth, square jaws like a lion; twenty-sixth, among all flavours he obtains the supreme flavour, and at two places in the throat saliva flows out; twenty-seventh, the tongue large, soft, and thin, able to cover the whole face up to the hairline at the ears; twenty-eighth, the Brahmā voice deep and far-reaching, like the sound of the kalaviṅka; twenty-ninth, the colour of the eyes like the essence of gold; thirtieth, the eyelashes like those of the ox-king; thirty-first, the mark of the white hair between the eyebrows, soft and pure white like douluo cotton; thirty-second, the topknot on the crown, made of flesh. These thirty-two marks are what the Buddha's body accomplishes.
‘His light illumines all the three-thousand great-thousand world; if he wishes to illumine broadly, it pervades the immeasurable asaṃkhyeya worlds of the ten directions; for the sake of beings he takes on a light of one zhang; if he emits immeasurable light, there are then no sun and moon, seasons, or years to speak of. The Buddha's voice pervades the three-thousand great-thousand world; if he wishes a great sound, it pervades the immeasurable asaṃkhyeya worlds of the ten directions; according to how many or how few are in the assembly, the voice reaches everywhere.’
四攝品之上:畢竟空中何以仍分別得出諸法;佛何以先說凡夫於夢化中猶起三業;二空說法與方便次第之拔出;希有難及法何以從報得六度說起;等一布施與福田之分別;乞身不生二心;畢竟空中之具足檀度;佛眼所見六事;四事攝取與財法二施;聖無漏法及其果;菩薩與佛何異;出世間不共凡夫法之逐目
在問什麼
前品〈六喻品〉把五陰說成如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,說到無相、不可分別、自相空。話說到這個地步,聽的人心裡會冒出一句很不客氣的話:既然全是夢,那善惡還分不分?四果還成不成?本品開卷,須菩提問的正是這一句——「若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者,云何分別是善法、是不善法」,一路數到有漏無漏、有為無為、四沙門果、辟支佛道、阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。這不是新問題,前品末尾已經問過一次;此處再問,是把同一個死結換一個角度重新繫緊:前次問的是『空中何以還修』,這次問的是『空中何以還分』。
佛的答覆有一個很值得注意的姿態:他不從空理上辯,先講一件事實——「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業」。夢是假的,夢裡起的業卻是真起的;法雖無所有,在凡夫分上卻實實在在地成其為有。分別之所以立得住,不是因為法有自性,是因為顛倒有現行。這一著答得極穩:不否認空,也不否認業。
接著佛立刻把話頭轉到菩薩身上,而且是兩句連著說的——菩薩「住二空中——畢竟空、無始空」為眾生說陰入界皆空皆如夢,說完,馬上「以方便力故,於慳法中拔出眾生,教行檀波羅蜜」,而後戒、而後禪、而後三十七品三解脫門乃至四果三乘。空說得最徹底的那個人,正是把人一階一階往上拔的那個人。這兩句連讀,全品的關節就在裡頭:說空是為了拔出,不是為了停住。須菩提於是讚歎「甚希有難及」,佛許可之後,說這是「一切聲聞、辟支佛不能報」的事;須菩提追問這希有難及之法究竟是什麼,佛答「一心諦聽!」,從報得的六波羅蜜、五神通、三十七助道法、諸陀羅尼、諸無礙智說起——本錢先交代清楚,然後才說怎麼用。
用的第一件事就是布施。經文於此處極不尋常地細:供佛與施禽獸「無有異」,「皆無分別,等一布施」;若起「佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養」之念,直判為「是非菩薩法」;人非人來乞身體支節,「不應生二心」;乃至最後把布施推到底——「是中誰與、誰受?所施何物?」三事俱不可得,住畢竟空、內空、外空乃至自相空而施,這才叫「具足檀波羅蜜」。等一、不簡擇、不惜身、不見三事,四層一層深過一層,這一段是本單元義理最密之處。
再往下,佛以「我以佛眼」起句,一連舉六件十方菩薩正在做的事:入大地獄令火滅湯冷、為諸佛給使而終不忘失、為畜生捨壽命割截身體、除餓鬼飢渴苦、六欲天上說法示現火燒宮殿、令諸梵天遠離邪見。從最苦處起,到最樂處、最高慢處止——苦處以神通與說法救,樂處以無常警動,高處以破邪見。這六件事是前文「希有難及」的實證,也是下文四攝的引子:講完,經文才正式標出「以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事。」而四攝之中,只先展開布施一門,布施又分財施、法施,財施列所施之物與所教之法,法施分世間、出世間,出世間又歸到「聖無漏法」與「聖無漏法果」。中間插入須菩提兩問——「菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智不?」「菩薩與佛有何等異?」——問的是名分與實得的關係,佛答得斬截:得了一切種智就名為佛,因為「菩薩心與佛心無有異」。末後一大段逐目開列出世間不共凡夫之法,從四念處一路數到三十二相,再以光明遍照、音聲遍滿收住。
所以之上一單元要答的,其實是三問:空中何以仍有善惡諸果之分別;說空的人何以正是攝生最力的人;而攝生之首的布施,何以必須做到「無與、無奪」才算具足。
逐段解明
一、須菩提之問——夢響影焰幻化、無實事無所有性自相空中,云何分別諸法。 經文開卷,須菩提白佛:「若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者,云何分別是善法、是不善法,是世間法、是出世間法,是有漏法、是無漏法,是有為法、是無為法」,乃至「是法能得須陀洹果,能得斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果,能得辟支佛道,能得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?」六喻在前,四對相待之法在後,末以四沙門果、辟支佛道、無上菩提結問。這一問的力道全在「自相空」三字上:若連自相都空,則能分別者與所分別者一併落空,善惡不成、聖果不立。須菩提不是不信空,他是替聽法的人把空義推到盡頭,看佛怎麼在盡頭處站住。
二、佛答之第一著——凡夫於夢化中猶起三業。 佛不先講理,先舉事:「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業,起福業、若起罪業、作不動業。」得夢,是領受了夢境;得見夢者,是連那個『正在作夢的我』也一併領受。人在這重重不實之中,照樣起身、口、意三業,照樣造善、造惡、造無記,照樣感福報、罪報與不動之報。『不動業』指四禪四無色之定業,感色無色界之報,故不同於欲界善惡之搖動。佛這一答是把問題的重心從『法有沒有』搬到『人怎麼了』:分別之所以立得住,不繫於法有自性,繫於顛倒有現行。夢是假的,夢中的驚怖與貪愛是真起的——這就是善惡果報之所由立。
三、菩薩住二空為眾生說陰入界空。 接著佛說菩薩之所行:「是菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,住二空中——畢竟空、無始空,為眾生說法」。所說之法,經文一字不略地鋪開:色空無所有,受想行識空無所有,十二入、十八界空無所有;色是夢,受想行識是夢;乃至十二入十八界是夢、是響、是影、是焰、是幻、是化。而後更進一層,連能領受的一邊也除掉——「是中無陰、入、界,無夢亦無見夢者」,乃至無化亦無見化者。末後點出病根:「一切法無根本實性無所有」,而汝等「於無陰中見有陰、無入見有入、無界見有界」,一切皆從因緣和合生,以顛倒心起,屬業果報,「汝等何以故於諸法空無根本中而取根本相?」『二空』於此並舉,各破一邊:畢竟空破法之實有,無始空破時之初際——人總要在時間的最前端替生死找一個起頭,無始空正是斷這一念。菩薩的說法從破所見之法起,到破能見之人止,最後落在一句反問上,不下斷語——把「取根本相」這件事交還給聽者自己去看。
四、方便力之次第拔出——從慳中拔出,安置無餘涅槃及涅槃道中。 空既說盡,經文立刻轉身:「是時,菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,以方便力故,於慳法中拔出眾生,教行檀波羅蜜」;持布施功德得大福報,從大福報拔出教令持戒,持戒功德生天上尊貴處,復拔出令住初禪,初禪功德生梵天處,二禪三禪四禪與四無色定亦如是。而後總收:以布施及其果報、持戒及其果報、禪定及其果報種種因緣拔出,「安置無餘涅槃及涅槃道中」,所謂四念處乃至八聖道分、三解脫門、八背捨、九次第定、佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法,「令住聖無漏法——無色、無形、無對法中」,隨其可得而安置四果、辟支佛道、阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。這一段最耐人尋味的是「拔出」二字重複出現:從慳中拔出、從大福報中拔出、從初禪中拔出。前一階的果報,正是下一階要拔離的處所——好處也要拔,因為停在好處就上不去。而『無色、無形、無對』三語,是說聖無漏法不是一件可以捉在手上的東西:無質礙、無形相、無對待,故安置於彼,不同於安置於天上尊貴處。說空與施設次第,在此一段裡合成一事。
五、須菩提之讚歎與佛之許可——聲聞辟支佛不能報。 須菩提白佛:「諸菩薩摩訶薩甚希有難及,能行是深般若波羅蜜,諸法無所有性,畢竟空、無始空,而分別諸法是善、是不善」乃至是有為是無為。佛答「如是!如是!」重述其語而許之,更進一句:「須菩提!汝等若知是菩薩摩訶薩希有難及法,則知一切聲聞、辟支佛不能報,何況餘人!」須菩提再白:「何等是菩薩摩訶薩希有難及法,諸聲聞、辟支佛所無有?」讚歎—許可—追問,三轉之間,話題就從『空中何以有分別』轉成了『菩薩何以能如此』。『不能報』一語值得停一下:不是說二乘不如菩薩之尊,是說菩薩這樣的作為,二乘連酬答、報償都談不上——不在同一個量級上,故無從相酬。須菩提的追問把全品的正文逼了出來。
六、希有難及法之總說——住報得六度五通而隨所應攝取。 佛答:「一心諦聽!」而後說菩薩行般若波羅蜜,「住報得六波羅蜜中及住報得五神通、三十七助道法,住諸陀羅尼、諸無礙智」,到十方世界,可以布施度者以布施攝之,可以持戒度者以持戒攝之,忍辱、精進、禪定、智慧亦然,「隨其所應而攝取之」;初禪乃至非有想非無想處亦然,慈悲喜捨亦然,四念處乃至八聖道分與空、無相、無作三昧亦然。『報得』二字是這一段的眼目:不是臨時修起來的,是果報上自然具足的——六度、五通、助道法、陀羅尼、無礙智,都是宿因所感,用時現成。本錢既足,才談得上「隨其所應」;若無報得之具,所謂隨機應物不過是空話。此段是總說,下文財施法施乃至佛眼六事,都是這一句的展開。
七、布施饒益眾生之一——等一布施,不作福田非福田之分別。 須菩提問:「菩薩摩訶薩云何以布施饒益眾生?」佛答菩薩行般若時布施,隨其所須飲食、衣服、車馬、香華、瓔珞種種所須盡給與之;而後說出判準:「若供養佛、辟支佛、阿羅漢、阿那含、斯陀含、須陀洹等無有異;若施入正道中人及凡人,下至禽獸,皆無分別,等一布施。」所以然者,「一切法不異、不分別故」;如是施已,「當得無分別法報,所謂一切種智」。反面則直判:若生「佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養」之心,「是非菩薩法」。更推一步:菩薩發心不作「是眾生應以布施饒益,是不應布施」之念;若有來乞者亦不生「應與是,不應與是」之異心分別。何以判得這樣重?經文自己說出理由——「是菩薩為是眾生故發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心」,既是為一切眾生而發心,則簡擇便是自毀其願;故墮諸佛菩薩乃至一切世間天人之訶責處:「誰請汝救一切眾生?汝為一切眾生舍、一切眾生護、一切眾生依,而分別簡擇應與、不應與?」這一段最要緊的是:福田有勝劣,是世間求福之理;菩薩之施不從求福上立,從「無分別法報」上立——所求者是一切種智,故因中先須無分別。
八、乞身體支節不生二心。 經文轉深一層:若人、若非人來欲求乞菩薩身體支節,「是時不應生二心:『若與?若不與?』」何以故?「是菩薩摩訶薩為眾生故受身,眾生來取,何可不與?」並記菩薩自念之語:我為饒益眾生故受是身,眾生不乞尚且應與,何況乞而不與。前段是身外之物之不簡擇,此段是身內之分之不猶豫。判準仍是同一句——受身的緣由既是為眾生,則身本非己有,來取者不過是取其所當得。『二心』二字下得準:不是要人強行割捨,是說在『與、不與』之間搖擺的那一念,本身就已離了般若。
九、畢竟空中之布施——誰與誰受、所施何物,住諸空故具足檀波羅蜜。 布施推到底處:菩薩見有乞者,應生是念——「是中誰與、誰受?所施何物?是一切法自性皆不可得,以畢竟空故;空相法,無與、無奪。」所以然者,「畢竟空故,內空故,外空、內外空、大空、第一義空、自相空故」;「住是諸空布施,是時具足檀波羅蜜」。而具足之後,縱使身被割截,亦作是念:「截我者誰?割我者誰?」施者、受者、施物三事俱不可得——經文不立總名,而其事在此。前兩段是心上不簡擇、不猶豫,此段是智上不見有三事;前者是慈悲之用,後者是般若之體。「無與、無奪」四字最當著眼:不是不施,是施而無施相;正因無施相,被割時才問得出「截我者誰」——那一問不是強忍,是實見。
十、佛眼所見之一——入大地獄,火滅湯冷,三事教化。 經文轉入實證,以「我以佛眼見東方如恒河沙等諸菩薩摩訶薩入大地獄」起。菩薩「令火滅湯冷,以三事教化:一者、神通,二者、知他心,三者、說法」:以神通力令獄火熄、鑊湯冷,知彼心之所趣,而後以慈悲喜捨隨意說法;眾生於菩薩生清淨心,從地獄得脫,漸以三乘得盡苦際;南西北方、四維上下亦如是。三事之次第不可倒:苦逼太急時說什麼都聽不進,故先以神通息其苦;苦息而不知其機,說亦不契,故次知他心;機既知矣,然後說法。救急、識機、授法——這是攝生的一般次第,地獄只是最極之例。
十一、佛眼所見之二——為諸佛給使,受持不忘。 「我以佛眼觀十方世界,見如恒河沙等國土中諸菩薩,為諸佛給使,供養諸佛,隨意愛樂恭敬」;諸佛所說盡能受持,「乃至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,終不忘失」。六事之中,唯此一事不向下益生,而向上事佛。給使是執役之稱,菩薩不以為屈;愛樂恭敬而受持不忘,是攝生之本錢從何處積來的交代——上文說「報得六波羅蜜」,此處便見其因。益物之力,先從承事處得。
十二、佛眼所見之三——為畜生捨壽命,食肉者得離畜生道。 「我以佛眼觀十方如恒河沙等國土中諸菩薩摩訶薩,為畜生故,捨其壽命,割截身體,分散諸方。」而後說其效驗:「諸有眾生食是諸菩薩摩訶薩肉者,皆愛敬菩薩;以愛敬故,即得離畜生道」,值遇諸佛,聞法修行,漸以三乘於無餘涅槃而般涅槃。此事最難思議處在於:得度的緣不是聞法,是食肉;不是明白,是愛敬。菩薩以身為緣,把一段本無法門可入的因緣強行接上。經文於此不作理上的解釋,只記其事——所以然者,之中一單元論主自有問答。此處當著眼者,是上文『乞身支節不生二心』在事上的極至:那裡是不猶豫,這裡是主動分散諸方。
十三、佛眼所見之四——除諸餓鬼飢渴苦。 「我以佛眼見十方如恒河沙等國土中諸菩薩摩訶薩除諸餓鬼飢渴苦」,諸餓鬼皆愛敬菩薩,以愛敬故得離餓鬼道,值遇諸佛,聞法修行,漸以三乘而般涅槃。末後一句是這一段的落點:「菩薩摩訶薩為度眾生故,行大悲心。」餓鬼之苦在飢渴,故所施者是飲食;與前段以肉身為緣同一機杼,而此處經文明標『大悲』之名。三惡道之中,地獄以神通息苦、畜生以身肉為緣、餓鬼以飲食除苦——所施雖異,得度之路一也:皆從愛敬而入。
十四、佛眼所見之五——六欲天上說法,示現火起。 「我以佛眼見諸菩薩摩訶薩在四天王天上說法」,三十三天、夜摩天、兜率陀天、化樂天、他化自在天上亦說法;諸天聞法,漸以三乘而得滅度。其中有貪著五欲者,「是菩薩示現火起,燒其宮殿,而為說法」,作是言:「諸天!一切有為法悉皆無常,誰得安者?」惡道之病在苦,天道之病在樂。苦處要先除苦才聽得進法,樂處卻要先壞其樂才醒得過來——火燒宮殿不是災,是說法的前方便;而所說之法只一句無常。「誰得安者」是問句,不是斷語:讓天人自己去找那個安住之處,找不到,無常之理便自己站住了。
十五、佛眼所見之六——令諸梵天遠離邪見。 「我以佛眼觀十方世界,見如恒河沙等國土中諸梵天著於邪見」,諸菩薩教令遠離邪見,作是言:「汝等云何於空相虛妄諸法中而生邪見?」而後結云:「菩薩摩訶薩住大慈心,為眾生說法。須菩提!是為諸菩薩希有難及法。」梵天已離欲染,其病不在貪樂而在見——於空相虛妄之法上妄計實有,遂起邪見。故所用之藥不是神通、不是飲食、不是無常,是直指其所著之法本自空虛。六事至此為一序列:地獄苦極、畜生無知、餓鬼飢渴、天著五欲、梵天著見、為佛給使——從身苦說到心惑,愈上而病愈細。而通貫六事者,前五繫於悲、此一繫於「大慈心」,末句更以「希有難及法」總收,回應第五段須菩提之追問。
十六、四事攝取之總標。 經文正式立目:「我以佛眼觀十方世界如恒河沙等國土中,諸菩薩摩訶薩以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事。」四者之名,此處但標而未釋——『布施』是以財法與人,『愛語』是以隨順之言相接,『利益』是勸導其行而使得益,『同事』是與之同其所作而後化之。經文之釋要到之下一單元才補齊,本單元只展開布施一門。品名「四攝」即出於此四字;而全品之所以以布施為首且獨廣,之中一單元論主自有問答,此處不預。
十七、布施攝取分二——財施、法施。 「云何菩薩以布施攝取眾生?須菩提!菩薩以二種施攝取眾生:財施、法施。」二施之分是本段的骨架:財施給的是所須之物,法施給的是所行之法。下文財施一段先列所施之物,隨即接以所教之法;法施一段則分世間、出世間。可以先看出一個安排:財施的末後必歸到教法,法施的末後必歸到聖無漏法果——菩薩之施,沒有一條路是止於所與之物的。
十八、財施攝取——所施之物與所教之法。 「何等財施攝取眾生?」經文先列物:金、銀、琉璃、頗梨、真珠、珂貝、珊瑚等諸寶物,或飲食、衣服、臥具、房舍、燈燭、華、香、瓔珞,若男、若女,若牛、羊、象、馬、車乘,若以己身,給施眾生;並語眾生言:「汝等若有所須,各來取之,如取己物,莫得疑難!」而後列法:施已教三歸依,或教五戒、一日戒,或教初禪乃至非有想非無想定,或教慈悲喜捨,或教念佛、念法、念僧、念戒、念捨、念天,或教不淨觀、安那般那觀,「或相、或觸」;或教四念處乃至八聖道分、三三昧、八背捨、九次第定、佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、大慈大悲、三十二相、八十隨形好;或教四沙門果、辟支佛道、阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。末後總收:以方便力教眾生,「財施已,後教令得無上安隱涅槃」,是名菩薩希有難及法。所列之物自珍寶而下至己身,與第八段『乞身體支節』相應——己身列在所施之末,正見財施之底線在何處。所教之法自三歸五戒起,一路升到無上菩提,次第宛然。其中「或相、或觸」二語,緊承安那般那觀而言,經文但舉其名而不更釋,是息念修習中所繫之相與所觸之處;本單元不強為之解。全段的關節在「財施已,後教令得」——財物是接引的第一步,不是布施的終點。
十九、法施二種——世間與出世間。 「須菩提!菩薩云何以法施攝取眾生?須菩提!法施有二種:一者、世間,二者、出世間。」世間法施者,「敷演、顯示世間法,所謂不淨觀、安那般那念、四禪、四無量心、四無色定」,「及諸餘共凡夫所行法,是名世間法施」。而菩薩作此世間法施已,「以種種因緣教化,令遠離世間法」;遠離已,以方便力「令得聖無漏法及聖無漏法果」。此段的判準是「共凡夫所行」五字:不淨觀、數息、四禪、四無量、四無色定,凡夫外道亦能修得,故攝入世間。而菩薩施此世間之法,其意不在令人住於此——先與之,再令離之,而後授以出世。與財施一段完全同構:先給他要的,再給他該要的。
二十、聖無漏法與聖無漏法果。 經文自設二問:「何等是聖無漏法?何等是聖無漏法果?」先答:「聖無漏法者,三十七助道法、三解脫門。聖無漏法果者,須陀洹果乃至阿羅漢果,辟支佛道,阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」而後更就菩薩分上重說一遍:菩薩摩訶薩之聖無漏法,是四沙門果中智慧、辟支佛道中智慧、三十七助道法中智慧、六波羅蜜中智慧乃至大慈大悲中智慧——如是一切法,「若世間若出世間智慧、若有漏若無漏、若有為若無為,是法中一切種智,是名菩薩摩訶薩聖無漏法」。其果則是:「斷一切煩惱習,是名聖無漏法果。」兩重回答的差別要看清:前答是通說三乘所共,後答是菩薩分上之獨義——菩薩的聖無漏法不是三十七品本身,是遍於一切法(不論世出世、有漏無漏、有為無為)而起的一切種智;其果亦不止於斷煩惱,而在「斷一切煩惱習」,連習氣的餘燼一併斷盡。這正回應了第一段須菩提之問:善不善、世出世、有漏無漏、有為無為之分別,非但不礙般若,正是一切種智所照之境。
廿一、須菩提二問——菩薩得一切種智不、菩薩與佛有何等異。 須菩提白佛:「菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智不?」佛言:「如是!如是!須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智。」須菩提再問:「菩薩與佛有何等異?」佛言:「有異。菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智,是名為佛。所以者何?菩薩心與佛心無有異。」而後接云:「菩薩住是一切種智中,於一切法無不照明,是名菩薩摩訶薩世間法施。須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩因世間法施,得出世間法施。」這兩問是連環:上文既說菩薩之聖無漏法即是一切種智,那麼菩薩豈不就是佛?須菩提替讀者把這個逼問提出來。佛答得極有分寸——先說「有異」,卻不在心上說異,而在名上說異:得一切種智即名為佛,心則無有異。異的是名分與位次,不異的是所證之心。這一答與上文「一切法不異、不分別」一脈:連菩薩與佛之異,也只落在世諦的名言上。末後把話收回法施:住一切種智而於一切法無不照明,這就是菩薩的世間法施——照得明白,才施得出去;而由世間法施引生出世間法施,正是前段『先與之、再令離之』的同一次第。
廿二、出世間不共凡夫法之總標。 「須菩提!何等是菩薩出世間法不共凡夫法同?」經文列目:四念處、四正勤、四如意足、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分,三解脫門、八背捨、九次第定,佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、三十二相、八十隨形好,五百陀羅尼門,「是名出世間法」。此目與第十九段「共凡夫所行法」正相對照:彼以共凡夫為判,此以不共凡夫為判。值得注意的是三十二相、八十隨形好也列在「不共」之中——相好本是色法,何以入出世間不共之數?經文於此不釋,之中一單元論主自有問答。以下逐目開演,是本單元篇幅最長之處;經文既逐目列名而後逐目自釋,此處便依其所釋而解,其但列名而不釋者,亦不強為之增。
廿三、四念處。 「菩薩摩訶薩觀內身循身觀、觀外身循身觀、觀內外身循身觀,勤精進,以一心智慧觀身、觀身集因緣、觀身滅、觀身集生滅;行是道,無所依,於世間無所愛。受、心、法念處,亦如是。」『循身觀』是就身而觀身,不離所觀之境別起想像;內、外、內外者,自身、他身、二者兼觀。而後四轉——觀身、觀身集起之因緣、觀身之滅、觀身集與生滅——是從現前之相看到它怎麼來、怎麼去。末二句是菩薩念處與凡夫觀身之所以異:「無所依」是不依所觀之法立足,「於世間無所愛」是觀成而不取。受、心、法三念處,經文以「亦如是」例之。
廿四、四正勤。 「未生惡不善法,為不生故,勤、生欲、精進;已生惡不善法,為斷故,勤、生欲、精進;未生善法,為生故,勤、生欲、精進;已生諸善法,為增長修具足故,勤、生欲、精進;是名四正勤。」四事分兩雙:惡法之未生與已生,對以不生、對以斷;善法之未生與已生,對以生、對以增長修習具足。每一事都繫以同樣的三詞——「勤、生欲、精進」:勤是策發,生欲是起樂欲之心,精進是相續不退。要緊處在「生欲」:正勤不是硬撐,是要先把想做的心提起來,勉強之力不能長久。
廿五、四如意足。 「欲三昧斷行成就初如意足,精進三昧、心三昧、思惟三昧斷行成就如意足。」四者以欲、精進、心、思惟為別,皆以「三昧」為體、以「斷行成就」為修。欲者樂欲,精進者策勵,心者專一,思惟者觀察;四門入定,各隨其所長。『斷行』是斷除違順之行而令定成就。經文於此極簡,但標其名與其成就之相,不更釋其用。
廿六、五根與五力。 「云何為五根?信根、精進根、念根、定根、慧根。」「云何為五力?信力、精進力、念力、定力、慧力。」二者同名而異稱:信、精進、念、定、慧五事,就其能生善法而言名『根』,就其不為所壞而言名『力』。經文於此但列其名,不更釋其相——名既與四念處以下同為三十七助道法之目,其義自在諸目相貫之中;本單元據經文所有而解,不據經文所無而增。
廿七、七覺分。 「念覺分、擇法覺分、精進覺分、喜覺分、除息覺分、定覺分、捨覺分。」七者亦但列名。就其字面之義:念是繫心不忘,擇法是揀別真偽,精進是策發不退,喜是法喜,除息是除去麁重而身心輕安,定是心一境性,捨是不取不著而平等。「覺分」者,成就覺悟之分支。經文此處不釋,故不更申。
廿八、八聖道分。 「正見、正思惟、正語、正業、正命、正精進、正念、正定。」八者亦但列名。見、思惟屬慧,語、業、命屬戒,精進、念、定屬定——戒定慧三學於此分為八支。經文既不別釋,此處亦止於其名之今語。
廿九、三三昧。 「云何為三三昧?空三昧門,無相、無作三昧門。」而後逐一自釋:「云何為空三昧?以空行、無我行攝心,是名空三昧。」「云何為無相三昧?以寂滅行、離行攝心,是為無相三昧。」「云何為無作三昧?無常行、苦行攝心,是為無作三昧。」三者皆以「攝心」為成就之相,而所攝之行各異:空三昧以空、無我二行,破法與我;無相三昧以寂滅、離二行,息諸相;無作三昧以無常、苦二行,絕造作之願求。與上文所列諸目不同,此三經文自釋其行,故其義有明文可據。稱「門」者,三者是入解脫之門戶。
三十、八背捨。 「內色相外觀色,是初背捨;內無色相外觀色,是二背捨;淨背捨,是三背捨;過一切色相,滅一切對相,不念一切異相故,觀無邊虛空,入無邊空處;乃至過一切非有想非無想處,入滅受想背捨。是名八背捨。」初二背捨之別,在內心尚存色想與已無色想,而俱以外色為所觀;第三淨背捨則轉觀淨色。第四以下為四無色定:超過色相、滅除對礙之相、不念種種異相,入無邊空處,乃至非有想非無想處;第八為滅受想背捨。「背捨」之名即出於其事——背而捨之,一重一重捨其所著。
卅一、九次第定。 「行者離欲、惡不善法,有覺有觀,離生喜樂,入初禪;第二、第三、第四禪;乃至過非有想非無想處,入滅受想定。是名九次第定。」四禪、四無色定、滅受想定,共為九;「次第」者,順次而入,不得躐等。經文於初禪備舉其相——離欲與惡不善法,有覺有觀,由離而生喜樂——其餘則以「乃至」例之。與前段八背捨所涉者多有重疊,而立名之意不同:彼取其背捨所著,此取其次第而入。
卅二、佛十力。 經文逐一開列:「是處、不是處,如實知」——知何者為理所應有、何者為理所必無;知眾生過去、未來、現在諸業諸受法,知造業處,知因緣,知報——業報之力;諸禪定、解脫、三昧、定的垢淨分別之相如實知——禪定之力;「知他眾生諸根上下相」——根之利鈍;「知他眾生種種欲解」——樂欲與勝解之別;「知一切世間種種無數性」——眾生性類之無量;「知一切到道相」——一切能至之道;「知種種宿命,一世乃至無量劫,如實知」——宿命之力;「天眼見眾生,乃至生善惡道」——天眼之力;「漏盡故,無漏心解脫,如實知」——漏盡之力。「是為佛十力。」十力所知,前三繫於法之理與眾生之業定,中四繫於眾生之根性欲解與道,後二繫於三世生死之始末,末一繫於自證。所以稱「力」者,知而無能壞、無能屈。
卅三、四無所畏。 經文以同一句式四番說之:佛作誠言「我是一切正智人」,若有沙門、婆羅門、天、魔、梵或餘眾如實言「是法不知」,「乃至不見是微畏相」;以是故得安隱、得無所畏,安住聖主處,在大眾中師子吼,能轉梵輪,而彼諸眾「實不能轉」——一無畏也。其次三番,所誠言者依次為「我一切漏盡」、「我說障法」、「我所說聖道,能出世間;隨是行,能盡苦」,而所設之難依次為「是漏不盡」、「受是法不障道」、「行是道不能出世間、不能盡苦」。四者所對,正是說法者可能被質疑的四處:所知、所斷、所遮、所行。而佛之無畏不從駁倒對方上說,從「乃至不見是微畏相」上說——連一絲怯意的影子都尋不著,這才是無所畏之實。
卅四、四無礙智。 「一者、義無礙智,二者、法無礙智,三者、辭無礙智,四者、樂說無礙智。」經文逐一自釋,而所釋皆同一句式:「緣義智慧,是為義無礙智」,法、辭、樂說亦然——各就其所緣而立名。義者所詮之理,法者能詮之教,辭者言辭之通,樂說者應機說法之無盡。四者合起來是說法者的四重通達:理通、教通、言通、應機通。經文之釋極簡,只點出『緣某而起之智慧』,不更分其相。
卅五、十八不共法。 經文逐條列出:諸佛身無失、口無失、念無失、無異想、無不定心、無不知已捨心——此六就佛之三業與心而言,身口意皆無過失,無有異想,無不入定之心,無未經了知而逕行棄捨之心;欲無減、精進無減、念無減、慧無減、解脫無減、解脫知見無減——此六就其德之不退而言,六事皆無有減損;一切身業隨智慧行、一切口業隨智慧行、一切意業隨智慧行——此三就三業皆以智慧為導而言;智慧知過去世無礙、知未來世無礙、知現在世無礙——此三就三世之智無礙而言。合十八事,皆聲聞辟支佛所不共。前六是無失,中六是無減,後六是隨智與無礙——由無過而至不退,由不退而至遍知。
卅六、三十二相。 經文逐相開列,三十二事俱全:足下安平立、平如奩底;足下有千輻輞輪而輪相具足;手足指長勝於餘人;手足柔軟勝餘身分;足跟廣而具足滿好;手足指間合有縵網勝於餘人;足趺高平好而與跟相稱;腿脛如伊泥延鹿王而纖好;平住時兩手能摩膝;陰藏之相如馬王、象王;身之縱廣相等如尼俱盧樹;一一毛孔各生一毛而色青、柔軟、右旋;身毛上向而青色柔軟右旋;金色之相而其色微妙勝閻浮檀金;身光四面各一丈;皮薄細滑不受塵垢而蚊蜹不停;七處滿——兩足下、兩手中、兩肩上、項中皆滿而字相分明;兩腋下滿;上身如師子;身廣端直;肩圓好;四十齒;齒白齊密而根深;四牙最白而大;方頰車如師子;味中得上味而咽中二處津液流出;舌大、軟、薄而能覆面至耳髮際;梵音深遠如迦蘭頻伽聲;眼色如金精;眼睫如牛王;眉間白毫相軟白如兜羅綿;頂髻肉成。末總之曰:「是三十二相,佛身成就。」三十二事之中,多有以獸王、樹、綿、金為喻者——不以抽象之語說德,以世間最上之物狀其形。相好在此列於出世間不共之法,正是前文「聖無漏法果」在色身上的顯現;何以相好能名為出世間不共,之中一單元論主自有問答。
卅七、光明遍照與音聲遍滿。 一單元之末,經文以二事收束:「光明遍照三千大千世界,若欲廣照,則遍滿十方無量阿僧祇世界,為眾生故受丈光」;若放無量光明,則無日月、時節、歲數。「佛音聲遍滿三千大千世界,若欲大聲,則遍滿十方無量阿僧祇世界;隨眾多少,音聲遍至。」二事同構:本量是遍滿十方無量世界,而現前所受者不過一丈之光、隨眾之聲。所以自限者,經文明說——「為眾生故受丈光」;若光明無量,則日月時節歲數俱無,眾生無所依憑而不得住。光與聲是佛身之用,其收放皆隨眾生之堪受,正與前文「隨其所應而攝取之」同一意趣。一單元以「攝取」起,以光聲之隨眾而至結,首尾相應。
不要讀錯
不要把「等一布施」讀成不分善惡、不辨對象。經文所遮的,是布施之時起「佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養」之簡擇心,理由是「一切法不異、不分別故」,所求者是「無分別法報,所謂一切種智」。這是就因中之心說,不是說果報上福田沒有勝劣。菩薩之施不從求福上立,故不簡擇;若把它讀成供佛與餵獸功德全等,便把世諦之理也一併抹掉了——而本品自始至終,正是在講畢竟空中如何不壞世諦之分別。
不要把佛答須菩提之問讀成『空是假的』。佛先舉凡夫於夢化中起三業,不是要撤回空義:菩薩隨後所說的仍是「是中無陰、入、界,無夢亦無見夢者」,仍是「一切法無根本實性無所有」。所立者是『法雖無所有,於凡夫分上成其為有』——有的不是法,是顛倒。把它讀成佛承認諸法實有,則下文「住是諸空布施」一段便無處安頓。
不要把菩薩捨身、割截、分散諸方讀成求苦之行。經文所記之效驗是「皆愛敬菩薩;以愛敬故,即得離畜生道」——捨身是為了接上一段本無法門可入的因緣,重心在所成之益,不在所受之苦。同樣,『乞身體支節』一段所遮的是「若與?若不與?」的二心,不是教人求人來乞。若讀成以自苦為德,便與第九段「住是諸空布施」之無與無奪相違了。
不要把「菩薩與佛有何等異」之答讀成菩薩即是佛。佛明答「有異」,而所以有異者在名——「得一切種智,是名為佛」;所以無異者在心——「菩薩心與佛心無有異」。異在名位,不異在所證,二語須合看。單取「無有異」而略去「有異」,是把世諦之分別抹去;單取「有異」而略去「心無有異」,則上文「一切法不異、不分別」一句又落空。
不要把『出世間不共凡夫法』中的相好讀成世間之美。三十二相列在不共之數,是就其為聖無漏法之果報而言;經文於此但列不釋,所以然者要到之中一單元論主之問答才說明。此處當守經文所有:既未釋,則不預判;既列於不共,則不以世間相好之見讀之。
修行作用
以「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者」一句校自己的空觀。學空的人最容易犯的病,是以為懂了空就可以不理會業。經文的第一著恰恰是:夢中之業真起,夢中之報真受。空義若使人輕忽善惡,那不是空義,是把空當了藉口。每逢覺得『反正都是空的』,取這一句來照——是誰在夢中起身口意業?
以「拔出」二字看待一切現前的好處。經文說從慳中拔出令布施,又從大福報中拔出令持戒,又從持戒果報中拔出令修定——前一階的果報正是下一階要拔離之處。修行到某一步嘗到甜頭,最易在那裡住下。取這一段自問:我現在守著的這一分安穩,是要拔出的處所,還是已被我當成了歸宿?
以「二心」為施捨時的自檢。經文遮的不是不捨,是在「若與?若不與?」之間搖擺的那一念。凡遇人有求——財物、時間、心力——先看自己心裡有沒有起那一秒的計算。起了不必自責,認得它就是本段所指之病,已是覺察;久之,給與不給的決定仍可依理而行,而那一段搖擺會愈來愈短。
以「誰與、誰受?所施何物?」收束布施之後的心。做了好事之後最難處理的是那個做好事的自己。經文給的不是『不要執著』的空話,是三個問句:施者是誰、受者是誰、所施何物。事畢之後取來自問一遍,三問俱無著落,那一分自得便自然落下——不是壓下去,是見得它本無立足處。
以救急、識機、授法三事次第待人。菩薩入地獄,先以神通令火滅湯冷,次知他心,然後說法。人在急難之中聽不進道理,這是常情。見人有苦,先設法止其苦;苦稍息,先了解他的心之所趣;機既知矣,才談得上說法。次第倒置,好話便成了負擔。
以「為眾生故受丈光」自檢說法與示人之量。佛之光明本可遍滿十方無量世界,而為眾生故只受一丈;音聲本可遍滿十方,而隨眾多少而至。能者自限,不是藏拙,是不使人無所依憑。凡有所知、有所能而欲示人者,先問一句:此處堪受幾分?超過所堪,光亦成障。
承衍
之上一單元,有經無論——本品經文前段盡在於此,論主之釋自之中一單元起。故此處所承者,是經文本身的伏筆與古德科判之所判。
經文於本單元留下三處明白的伏筆,皆待之中、之下補足:其一,第八、第十二兩段捨身割截之事,經文只記其事與其效驗,而不釋『眾生食菩薩肉何以反得度』『菩薩何以不生瞋悔』之理;其二,三十二相、八十隨形好列於『出世間不共凡夫法』之中,經文但列不釋,而相好本是轉輪聖王等所共,其所以稱不共者未言;其三,四攝法總標布施、愛語、利益、同事四事,而本單元獨開布施一門,愛語以下三事未釋,布施之中又略財施而廣法施之所以然亦未言。三處皆是論主之中、之下所問所答之處,此處不預。
吉藏《大品經義疏》於本品有全品之科判,於之上一單元所判如次。其總判本品之位云:「此下第二明外化方便。前是內行方便,亦前是自行今是化他,由內行滿足故能外益生。」而後分本品為二:「初品為二:第一明菩薩化攝無邊為益無量,第二明菩薩雖能廣利不存化功。」又於前分更判為二:「初為二:第一明生身方便益物,第二明法身菩提化物遍滿十方也。」其判須菩提初問之所以重問,列古說三義:「昔論有三義生起:一者云上來已作此問,今更問者,無始來有所得病難破故也。二者說經將訖,空是入道之要,如云離三解脫問無知無見,是故更問空義也。三者、佛在世眾利根易悟,佛滅度五百歲後眾生鈍根難悟,多生著心,聞說空便言:若空如夢幻者,何以有善惡報耶?須菩提愍末世眾生,是故問也。」並辨本品之答與前品之答有別:「上品末答明無所有破病,今品答明法雖無所有於凡夫有也。」其釋方便次第拔出一段云:「先於慳中拔出令持戒,持戒是中根人故;次於戒中拔出令修定,如是於三界拔出令得二乘,二乘中拔出令得大乘,大乘中拔出令悟無三無一。」其判布施一段之外施云:「外施中為二:初、正明平等施為得;次、明簡擇施為失。」其判佛眼所見六事云:「次我以佛眼下,第二、引證。」其判四攝之標目云:「復次我以佛眼四攝下,第二、明四攝,即四:先釋布施。」其釋須菩提『菩薩得一切種智不』之問云:「此是進退難也。」而判佛答之意云:「當得種智名菩薩,已得種智名佛也。」其釋出世間法施廣列諸科之所以云:「序品列成為勸學廣,大乘列為成大乘,今列為成法施。」又設問答於相好云:「問:三十二相云何是出世間法?答:此是無漏果無漏業日起。」
吉藏判財施法施一段,其文作「初明財施中先明法施,如文也」;而經文次第實先列財施之物、後說法施二種,與此語相違。現存之文如是,並錄不判。
慧影《大智度論疏》現存文本止於品六十九之中,本品無疏可承,闕釋,非略而不釋。
之中一單元,論主自『上已處處說性空,何以復從善不善重問』起,逐一釋本單元所留之問——重問之三義、捨身不生二心、畢竟空中之無與無奪、割截而不瞋悔之四說、三惡道何以不盡度、食菩薩肉何以得度、何以廣說人道、四攝何以獨廣布施、布施何以廣說法施、須菩提何以問得一切種智、九次第定與相好何以稱出世間不共、何以至論將訖方說相好、佛十力之廣釋乃至三十二相定不定之四說——皆承此單元之經文而來。之下一單元則續說八十隨形好,而後轉入愛語、利行、同事三攝與四十二字門,末歸於法性、二諦與說法無著之義。
The Four Means of Gathering, First Part: Why Dharmas Are Still Distinguished within Ultimate Emptiness; Why the Buddha First Speaks of Ordinary People Still Giving Rise to the Three Kinds of Deeds within Dreams and Conjurations; Teaching the Dharma in the Two Emptinesses and the Pulling Out in Sequence by Skilful Means; Why the Dharma Rare and Hard to Equal Begins from the Six Perfections Obtained as Retribution; One and the Same Giving and the Distinction of Fields of Merit; Not Giving Rise to Two Minds When the Body Is Begged; Making Dānapāramitā Complete within Ultimate Emptiness; the Six Things Seen by the Buddha-eye; Gathering In by the Four Things and the Two Gifts of Wealth and Dharma; the Noble Dharma without Outflows and Its Fruit; How the Bodhisattva Differs from the Buddha; the World-transcending Dharmas Not Shared with Ordinary People, Item by Item
What Is Being Asked
The preceding chapter, "The Six Similes", spoke of the five aggregates as like a dream, like an echo, like a shadow, like a mirage, like an illusion, like a conjuration, and went on to speak of the signless, of what cannot be discriminated, and of the emptiness of specific marks. With the talk come this far, a very impolite sentence will rise in the hearer's mind: since everything is a dream, are good and evil still to be distinguished or not? Are the four fruits still accomplished or not? At the opening of this chapter, what Subhūti asks is exactly this sentence—「若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者,云何分別是善法、是不善法」 tr. "If all dharmas are like a dream, like an echo, like a shadow, like a mirage, like an illusion, like a conjuration, without real substance, without any existent nature, and empty of specific marks, how is it distinguished that this is a wholesome dharma, this is an unwholesome dharma", counting all the way to with outflows and without outflows, conditioned and unconditioned, the four fruits of the śramaṇa, the path of the pratyekabuddha, and anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. This is not a new question; it was already asked once at the end of the preceding chapter; asking it again here is retying the same dead knot tighter from another angle: what was asked before was ‘why one still cultivates within emptiness’; what is asked this time is ‘why one still distinguishes within emptiness’.
The Buddha's answer has a posture well worth noticing: he does not argue from the principle of emptiness, but first speaks of a fact—「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業」 tr. "ordinary foolish people find the dream and find the one who sees the dream, and so on up to finding the conjuration and finding the one who sees the conjuration, and give rise to wholesome deeds, unwholesome deeds, and indeterminate deeds of body, speech, and mind". The dream is false, yet the deeds that arise in the dream truly arise; though dharmas are without anything existent, on the side of ordinary people they really and substantially come to be existent. That distinction can stand is not because dharmas have self-nature; it is because inversion is actively present. This move answers with great steadiness: it does not deny emptiness, and it does not deny deeds either.
Next the Buddha at once turns the head of the talk to the bodhisattva, and says two sentences in one breath—the bodhisattva 「住二空中——畢竟空、無始空」 tr. "abides in the two emptinesses—ultimate emptiness and beginningless emptiness" and teaches beings that the aggregates, the sense-fields, and the elements are all empty and all like a dream; having said this, at once 「以方便力故,於慳法中拔出眾生,教行檀波羅蜜」 tr. "by reason of the power of skilful means he pulls beings out from the dharma of stinginess and teaches them to practise dānapāramitā", and after that morality, after that dhyāna, after that the thirty-seven limbs of the path and the three gates of liberation, and so on up to the four fruits and the three vehicles. The one who speaks of emptiness most thoroughly is precisely the one who pulls people upward step by step. Read these two sentences together and the joint of the whole chapter lies within them: emptiness is spoken in order to pull out, not in order to stop. Subhūti therefore praises 「甚希有難及」 tr. "very rare and hard to equal", and the Buddha, having approved, says that this is a matter which 「一切聲聞、辟支佛不能報」 tr. "no śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha can requite"; Subhūti presses on to ask what this dharma rare and hard to equal is after all, and the Buddha answers 「一心諦聽!」 tr. "Listen attentively with one mind!", and begins from the six perfections, the five supernormal powers, the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path, the dhāraṇīs, and the unobstructed knowledges obtained as retribution—first the capital is made clear, and only then is it told how it is used.
The first thing it is used for is giving. Here the sūtra is extraordinarily detailed: making offerings to the Buddha and giving to birds and beasts 「無有異」 tr. "are without difference", 「皆無分別,等一布施」 tr. "all without discrimination, one and the same giving"; if the thought arises 「佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養」 tr. "The Buddha is a field of merit, I should make offerings; birds and beasts are not a field of merit, I should not make offerings", it is judged outright 「是非菩薩法」 tr. "this is not the bodhisattva's dharma"; when humans and non-humans come to beg the limbs and joints of the body, 「不應生二心」 tr. "he should not give rise to two minds"; and so on until at the last giving is pushed to the bottom—「是中誰與、誰受?所施何物?」 tr. "Who here gives, who receives? What thing is given?" The three things are all unfindable; abiding in ultimate emptiness, inner emptiness, outer emptiness, and so on up to the emptiness of specific marks, he gives, and only this is called 「具足檀波羅蜜」 tr. "making dānapāramitā complete". One and the same, not picking and choosing, not sparing the body, not seeing the three things—four layers, each deeper than the last: this section is the place of densest doctrine in this unit.
Further on, the Buddha begins with 「我以佛眼」 tr. "With the Buddha-eye I", and in one row names six things that bodhisattvas of the ten directions are doing: entering the great hells and making the fire go out and the boiling water grow cold; serving as attendants to the buddhas and never in the end forgetting or losing; giving up their lives and cutting and severing their bodies for the sake of animals; removing the suffering of hunger and thirst of the hungry ghosts; teaching the Dharma in the six heavens of desire and showing fire burning their palaces; making the Brahmā gods be far from wrong views. They begin from the place of greatest suffering and stop at the place of greatest pleasure and greatest pride—the places of suffering are rescued by supernormal power and by teaching the Dharma, the place of pleasure is startled awake by impermanence, the high place by breaking wrong views. These six things are the actual proof of the earlier 「希有難及」 tr. "rare and hard to equal", and also the lead-in to the four means of gathering below: only when they have been told does the sūtra formally mark out 「以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事。」 tr. "He gathers in beings by four things. What are the four? Giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour." And among the four means of gathering, only the one gate of giving is unfolded first; giving is further divided into the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma; the gift of wealth lists the things given and the dharmas taught; the gift of Dharma is divided into worldly and world-transcending; and the world-transcending is further brought home to 「聖無漏法」 tr. "the noble dharma without outflows" and 「聖無漏法果」 tr. "the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows". In between are inserted two questions of Subhūti's—「菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智不?」 tr. "Does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva obtain the omniscience of all kinds?" 「菩薩與佛有何等異?」 tr. "What difference is there between the bodhisattva and the Buddha?"—what they ask about is the relation between name and status and what is actually obtained, and the Buddha answers decisively: having obtained the omniscience of all kinds he is named Buddha, because 「菩薩心與佛心無有異」 tr. "the bodhisattva's mind and the Buddha's mind are without difference". At the end a long section lists item by item the world-transcending dharmas not shared with ordinary people, counting from the four foundations of mindfulness all the way to the thirty-two marks, and then closes with the light illumining everywhere and the voice pervading everywhere.
So what the single unit of the First Part has to answer is in fact three questions: why within emptiness there is still the distinction of good and evil and of the various fruits; why the one who speaks of emptiness is precisely the one who gathers in the living most strongly; and why giving, the first of the means of gathering in the living, must reach 「無與、無奪」 tr. "no giving and no taking away" before it counts as complete.
Passage by Passage
1. Subhūti's question—within dream, echo, shadow, mirage, illusion, and conjuration, without real substance, without any existent nature, and empty of specific marks, how are dharmas distinguished? At the opening of the sūtra, Subhūti says to the Buddha: 「若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者,云何分別是善法、是不善法,是世間法、是出世間法,是有漏法、是無漏法,是有為法、是無為法」 tr. "If all dharmas are like a dream, like an echo, like a shadow, like a mirage, like an illusion, like a conjuration, without real substance, without any existent nature, and empty of specific marks, how is it distinguished that this is a wholesome dharma, this is an unwholesome dharma; this is a worldly dharma, this is a world-transcending dharma; this is a dharma with outflows, this is a dharma without outflows; this is a conditioned dharma, this is an unconditioned dharma", and so on up to 「是法能得須陀洹果,能得斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果,能得辟支佛道,能得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?」 tr. "that this dharma can obtain the fruit of the srota-āpanna, can obtain the fruit of the sakṛdāgāmin, the fruit of the anāgāmin, the fruit of the arhat, can obtain the path of the pratyekabuddha, can obtain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi?" The six similes come first, the four pairs of mutually dependent dharmas after, and at the end the question is concluded with the four fruits of the śramaṇa, the path of the pratyekabuddha, and unsurpassed awakening. The whole force of this question lies in the three Chinese characters 「自相空」 tr. "empty of specific marks": if even specific marks are empty, then the one who distinguishes and what is distinguished fall into emptiness together; good and evil are not accomplished, and the noble fruits do not stand. It is not that Subhūti does not believe in emptiness; on behalf of those hearing the Dharma he pushes the meaning of emptiness to its very end, to see how the Buddha stands firm at that end.
2. The first move of the Buddha's answer—ordinary people still give rise to the three kinds of deeds within dreams and conjurations. The Buddha does not first speak of principle; he first raises a fact: 「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業,起福業、若起罪業、作不動業。」 tr. "Ordinary foolish people find the dream and find the one who sees the dream, and so on up to finding the conjuration and finding the one who sees the conjuration, and give rise to wholesome deeds, unwholesome deeds, and indeterminate deeds of body, speech, and mind; they give rise to deeds of merit, or give rise to deeds of sin, or do immovable deeds." To find the dream is to receive the dream-world; to find the one who sees the dream is to receive along with it even that ‘I who am dreaming’. Within these layer upon layer of unreality, people just the same give rise to the three kinds of deeds of body, speech, and mind, just the same make good, make evil, make the indeterminate, just the same incur the retributions of merit, of sin, and of the immovable. ‘Immovable deeds’ refers to the absorption-deeds of the four dhyānas and the four formless absorptions, which incur retribution in the form realm and the formless realm, and so differ from the shaking of good and evil in the desire realm. With this answer the Buddha moves the centre of gravity of the question from ‘whether dharmas exist or not’ to ‘what has become of people’: that distinction can stand does not hang on dharmas having self-nature; it hangs on inversion being actively present. The dream is false; the terror and craving within the dream truly arise—this is where good and evil and their retribution come to be established.
3. The bodhisattva abides in the two emptinesses and teaches beings that the aggregates, the sense-fields, and the elements are empty. Next the Buddha speaks of what the bodhisattva practises: 「是菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,住二空中——畢竟空、無始空,為眾生說法」 tr. "This bodhisattva-mahāsattva, practising prajñāpāramitā, abides in the two emptinesses—ultimate emptiness and beginningless emptiness—and teaches the Dharma for beings". The Dharma that is taught, the sūtra spreads out without leaving out a single character: form is empty and without anything existent; feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness are empty and without anything existent; the twelve sense-fields and the eighteen elements are empty and without anything existent; form is a dream, feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness are a dream; and so on up to the twelve sense-fields and the eighteen elements are a dream, are an echo, are a shadow, are a mirage, are an illusion, are a conjuration. And then it goes one layer further, removing even the side that is able to receive—「是中無陰、入、界,無夢亦無見夢者」 tr. "within this there are no aggregates, no sense-fields, no elements; there is no dream and also no one who sees the dream", and so on up to there is no conjuration and also no one who sees the conjuration. At the end it points out the root of the sickness: 「一切法無根本實性無所有」 tr. "all dharmas are without root, without real nature, without anything existent", while you 「於無陰中見有陰、無入見有入、無界見有界」 tr. "within what has no aggregates see that there are aggregates; within what has no sense-fields see that there are sense-fields; within what has no elements see that there are elements"; all of it arises from the coming together of causes and conditions, arises from an inverted mind, and belongs to the retribution of deeds; 「汝等何以故於諸法空無根本中而取根本相?」 tr. "why do you, within dharmas that are empty and without root, grasp at the root-mark?" The ‘two emptinesses’ are raised together here, each breaking one side: ultimate emptiness breaks the real existence of dharmas, beginningless emptiness breaks the first limit of time—people always want, at the very front of time, to find a starting point for birth and death, and beginningless emptiness is exactly what cuts off that thought. The bodhisattva's teaching begins from breaking the dharmas that are seen and stops at breaking the person who sees, and finally lands on a question in return, without pronouncing a verdict—handing the matter of 「取根本相」 tr. "grasping at the root-mark" back to the hearers to look at for themselves.
4. The pulling out in sequence by the power of skilful means—pulled out from stinginess, set in nirvāṇa without remainder and in the path to nirvāṇa. Emptiness having been spoken to the full, the sūtra immediately turns around: 「是時,菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,以方便力故,於慳法中拔出眾生,教行檀波羅蜜」 tr. "At this time the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, practising prajñāpāramitā, by reason of the power of skilful means pulls beings out from the dharma of stinginess and teaches them to practise dānapāramitā"; by the merit of holding to giving they obtain a great reward of merit; he pulls them out from the great reward of merit and teaches them to keep morality; the merit of keeping morality brings birth in a noble place among the gods; again he pulls them out and makes them abide in the first dhyāna; the merit of the first dhyāna brings birth in the place of Brahmā; the second, third, and fourth dhyānas and the four formless absorptions are also like this. And then the whole is gathered up: by all kinds of causes and conditions—giving and its retribution, keeping morality and its retribution, meditative concentration and its retribution—he pulls them out and 「安置無餘涅槃及涅槃道中」 tr. "sets them in nirvāṇa without remainder and in the path to nirvāṇa", namely the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eightfold noble path, the three gates of liberation, the eight liberations, the nine successive absorptions, the Buddha's ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, and the eighteen unshared dharmas; 「令住聖無漏法——無色、無形、無對法中」 tr. "he makes them abide in the noble dharma without outflows—within the dharma without form, without shape, without resistance", and according to what each can obtain he sets them in the four fruits, the path of the pratyekabuddha, and anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. What is most worth savouring in this section is that the two Chinese characters 「拔出」 tr. "pull out" appear again and again: pulled out from stinginess, pulled out from the great reward of merit, pulled out from the first dhyāna. The retribution of the preceding step is precisely the place the next step must pull away from—even good places must be pulled out of, because one who stops in a good place cannot go up. And the three expressions ‘without form, without shape, without resistance’ say that the noble dharma without outflows is not a thing that can be caught and held in the hand: without material obstruction, without shape or mark, without anything set over against it; therefore to be set in it is not the same as to be set in a noble place among the gods. Speaking of emptiness and setting up a sequence join into one matter in this section.
5. Subhūti's praise and the Buddha's approval—what the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas cannot requite. Subhūti says to the Buddha: 「諸菩薩摩訶薩甚希有難及,能行是深般若波羅蜜,諸法無所有性,畢竟空、無始空,而分別諸法是善、是不善」 tr. "The bodhisattva-mahāsattvas are very rare and hard to equal: they can practise this deep prajñāpāramitā, where dharmas are without any existent nature, are ultimate emptiness and beginningless emptiness, and yet distinguish dharmas as wholesome, as unwholesome", and so on up to as conditioned, as unconditioned. The Buddha answers 「如是!如是!」 tr. "Just so! Just so!", restates his words and approves them, and goes one sentence further: 「須菩提!汝等若知是菩薩摩訶薩希有難及法,則知一切聲聞、辟支佛不能報,何況餘人!」 tr. "Subhūti! If you know this dharma of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, rare and hard to equal, then you know that no śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha can requite it, how much less other people!" Subhūti speaks again: 「何等是菩薩摩訶薩希有難及法,諸聲聞、辟支佛所無有?」 tr. "What is the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's dharma, rare and hard to equal, that the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas do not have?" Praise—approval—further question: within these three turns the topic shifts from ‘why there is distinction within emptiness’ to ‘how the bodhisattva can be like this’. The phrase ‘cannot requite’ is worth pausing on: it does not say that those of the two vehicles are not as honoured as the bodhisattva; it says that, toward the bodhisattva's acting in this way, those of the two vehicles cannot even speak of answering or repaying—they are not of the same order of magnitude, so there is no way to repay in kind. Subhūti's further question forces out the main text of the whole chapter.
6. The general statement of the dharma rare and hard to equal—abiding in the six perfections and the five supernormal powers obtained as retribution, he gathers in according to what is fitting. The Buddha answers: 「一心諦聽!」 tr. "Listen attentively with one mind!", and then says that the bodhisattva practises prajñāpāramitā, 「住報得六波羅蜜中及住報得五神通、三十七助道法,住諸陀羅尼、諸無礙智」 tr. "abides in the six perfections obtained as retribution, and abides in the five supernormal powers and the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path obtained as retribution, abides in the dhāraṇīs and the unobstructed knowledges", and goes to the worlds of the ten directions: those who can be delivered by giving he gathers by giving, those who can be delivered by keeping morality he gathers by keeping morality, and patience, vigour, meditative concentration, and wisdom likewise—「隨其所應而攝取之」 tr. "he gathers them in according to what is fitting for them"; the first dhyāna and so on up to the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception likewise, kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity likewise, the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eightfold noble path, and the emptiness, signless, and non-action samādhi likewise. The two Chinese characters ‘obtained as retribution’ are the eye of this section: these are not cultivated on the spot, but are complete of themselves in retribution—the six perfections, the five supernormal powers, the dharmas that aid the path, the dhāraṇīs, and the unobstructed knowledges are all incurred by former causes, and are ready to hand when used. Only when the capital is sufficient can one speak of 「隨其所應」 tr. "according to what is fitting"; without the equipment obtained as retribution, so-called responding to beings according to their capacities is nothing but empty talk. This section is the general statement; the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma below, and so on up to the six things seen by the Buddha-eye, are all the unfolding of this one sentence.
7. Benefiting beings by giving, one—one and the same giving, not making the distinction of field of merit and not field of merit. Subhūti asks: 「菩薩摩訶薩云何以布施饒益眾生?」 tr. "How does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva benefit beings by giving?" The Buddha answers that when the bodhisattva practises prajñā he gives, and according to what each needs—food and drink, clothing, carriages and horses, incense and flowers, necklaces, all kinds of things needed—he gives it all; and then he states the criterion: 「若供養佛、辟支佛、阿羅漢、阿那含、斯陀含、須陀洹等無有異;若施入正道中人及凡人,下至禽獸,皆無分別,等一布施。」 tr. "Whether he makes offerings to the Buddha, the pratyekabuddha, the arhat, the anāgāmin, the sakṛdāgāmin, the srota-āpanna, and so on, there is no difference; whether he gives to people who have entered the right path or to ordinary people, down to birds and beasts, all is without discrimination, one and the same giving." The reason is 「一切法不異、不分別故」 tr. "because all dharmas are not different and without discrimination"; having given thus, 「當得無分別法報,所謂一切種智」 tr. "he will obtain the retribution of the dharma without discrimination, namely the omniscience of all kinds". The reverse side is judged outright: if the mind arises 「佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養」 tr. "The Buddha is a field of merit, I should make offerings; birds and beasts are not a field of merit, I should not make offerings", 「是非菩薩法」 tr. "this is not the bodhisattva's dharma". It is pushed one step further: the bodhisattva who has aroused the mind does not have the thought 「是眾生應以布施饒益,是不應布施」 tr. "this being should be benefited by giving; this one should not be given to"; if one comes to beg, he also does not give rise to the different mind that discriminates 「應與是,不應與是」 tr. "I should give to this one, I should not give to that one". Why is the judgement made so heavy? The sūtra itself states the reason—「是菩薩為是眾生故發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心」 tr. "this bodhisattva aroused the mind of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi for the sake of this being"; since he aroused the mind for the sake of all beings, picking and choosing is destroying his own vow; therefore he falls into the place of rebuke by the buddhas and bodhisattvas and so on up to all the gods and humans of the world: 「誰請汝救一切眾生?汝為一切眾生舍、一切眾生護、一切眾生依,而分別簡擇應與、不應與?」 tr. "Who asked you to rescue all beings? You are the house of all beings, the protection of all beings, the refuge of all beings, and yet you discriminate and pick and choose whom you should give to and whom you should not give to?" What matters most in this section is this: that fields of merit are superior and inferior is the principle of seeking merit in the world; the bodhisattva's giving is not established on seeking merit but on 「無分別法報」 tr. "the retribution of the dharma without discrimination"—what he seeks is the omniscience of all kinds, and therefore in the cause he must first be without discrimination.
8. When the limbs and joints of the body are begged, not giving rise to two minds. The sūtra turns one layer deeper: if a human or a non-human comes wishing to beg the limbs and joints of the bodhisattva's body, 「是時不應生二心:『若與?若不與?』」 tr. "at that time he should not give rise to two minds: ‘Shall I give? Or shall I not give?’" Why? 「是菩薩摩訶薩為眾生故受身,眾生來取,何可不與?」 tr. "This bodhisattva-mahāsattva receives his body for the sake of beings; when beings come to take it, how can he not give?" It also records the words of the bodhisattva's own thought: I received this body for the sake of benefiting beings; even if beings do not beg, I should still give it, how much less may I not give when they have begged. The preceding section is not picking and choosing among things outside the body; this section is not hesitating over what is a part of the body itself. The criterion is still the same sentence—since the reason for receiving the body is for the sake of beings, the body is from the first not one's own possession, and one who comes to take it only takes what he should get. The two Chinese characters ‘two minds’ are set down precisely: it does not ask a person to force himself to cut away and give up; it says that the very thought which wavers between ‘giving and not giving’ has in itself already departed from prajñā.
9. Giving within ultimate emptiness—who gives, who receives, what thing is given; because he abides in the emptinesses he makes dānapāramitā complete. Where giving is pushed to the bottom: when the bodhisattva sees one who begs, he should give rise to this thought—「是中誰與、誰受?所施何物?是一切法自性皆不可得,以畢竟空故;空相法,無與、無奪。」 tr. "Who here gives, who receives? What thing is given? The self-nature of all these dharmas is unfindable, because of ultimate emptiness; in the dharma of the mark of emptiness there is no giving and no taking away." The reason is 「畢竟空故,內空故,外空、內外空、大空、第一義空、自相空故」 tr. "because of ultimate emptiness, because of inner emptiness, because of outer emptiness, inner-and-outer emptiness, great emptiness, the emptiness of the highest meaning, and the emptiness of specific marks"; 「住是諸空布施,是時具足檀波羅蜜」 tr. "abiding in these emptinesses he gives, and at that time he makes dānapāramitā complete". And after it is made complete, even if his body is cut and severed, he has this thought: 「截我者誰?割我者誰?」 tr. "Who is it that cuts me off? Who is it that severs me?" The giver, the recipient, and the thing given—the three are all unfindable; the sūtra does not set up a general name for this, yet the matter is here. The two preceding sections are not picking and choosing and not hesitating in the mind; this section is not seeing that the three things exist, in wisdom; the former is the function of kindness and compassion, the latter the substance of prajñā. The four Chinese characters 「無與、無奪」 tr. "no giving and no taking away" most deserve attention: it is not that he does not give; he gives without the mark of giving; precisely because there is no mark of giving, when he is cut he can ask 「截我者誰」 tr. "who is it that cuts me off"—that question is not forced endurance; it is real seeing.
10. What the Buddha-eye sees, one—entering the great hells, the fire goes out and the boiling water grows cold, teaching and transforming by three things. The sūtra turns to actual proof, beginning with 「我以佛眼見東方如恒河沙等諸菩薩摩訶薩入大地獄」 tr. "With the Buddha-eye I see bodhisattva-mahāsattvas as many as the sands of the Ganges in the eastern direction entering the great hells". The bodhisattvas 「令火滅湯冷,以三事教化:一者、神通,二者、知他心,三者、說法」 tr. "make the fire go out and the boiling water grow cold, and teach and transform by three things: first, supernormal power; second, knowing others' minds; third, teaching the Dharma": by the power of supernormal power they put out the fire of the hells and cool the boiling cauldrons, they know where the minds of those beings tend, and then with kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity they teach the Dharma according to their intent; the beings give rise to a pure mind toward the bodhisattvas, gain release from the hells, and little by little by the three vehicles come to reach the end of suffering; the southern, western, and northern directions, the four intermediate directions, above and below, are also like this. The sequence of the three things cannot be reversed: when the press of suffering is too urgent, nothing that is said can be taken in, so first supernormal power stills their suffering; if the suffering is stilled but their capacity is not known, what is said will not fit, so next comes knowing others' minds; once the capacity is known, then the Dharma is taught. Rescuing from urgency, recognising the capacity, imparting the Dharma—this is the general sequence of gathering in the living; the hells are only the most extreme example.
11. What the Buddha-eye sees, two—serving as attendants to the buddhas, receiving and upholding without forgetting. 「我以佛眼觀十方世界,見如恒河沙等國土中諸菩薩,為諸佛給使,供養諸佛,隨意愛樂恭敬」 tr. "With the Buddha-eye I look upon the worlds of the ten directions and see, in lands as many as the sands of the Ganges, bodhisattvas serving as attendants to the buddhas, making offerings to the buddhas, loving, delighting in, and revering them according to their wishes"; whatever the buddhas teach they can all receive and uphold, 「乃至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,終不忘失」 tr. "and so on up to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, never in the end forgetting or losing it". Among the six things, only this one does not benefit the living below but serves the buddhas above. ‘Attendant’ is the name for one who performs service, and the bodhisattva does not take it as a humiliation; loving, delighting, and revering, and receiving and upholding without forgetting—this is the account of where the capital for gathering in the living is accumulated from: above it was said 「報得六波羅蜜」 tr. "the six perfections obtained as retribution", and here its cause is seen. The power to benefit beings is first obtained from the place of serving.
12. What the Buddha-eye sees, three—giving up their lives for animals; those who eat the flesh get to leave the animal destiny. 「我以佛眼觀十方如恒河沙等國土中諸菩薩摩訶薩,為畜生故,捨其壽命,割截身體,分散諸方。」 tr. "With the Buddha-eye I look upon lands as many as the sands of the Ganges in the ten directions, and in them bodhisattva-mahāsattvas, for the sake of animals, give up their own lives, cut and sever their bodies, and scatter them in all directions." And then it tells the effect: 「諸有眾生食是諸菩薩摩訶薩肉者,皆愛敬菩薩;以愛敬故,即得離畜生道」 tr. "All beings who eat the flesh of these bodhisattva-mahāsattvas love and revere the bodhisattvas; because of love and reverence, they at once get to leave the animal destiny"; they meet the buddhas, hear the Dharma, cultivate the practice, and little by little by the three vehicles attain parinirvāṇa in nirvāṇa without remainder. What is hardest to conceive in this matter lies here: the condition for deliverance is not hearing the Dharma but eating flesh; not understanding, but love and reverence. With his body as the condition, the bodhisattva forcibly joins up a stretch of causes and conditions that had no gate of Dharma by which to enter. The sūtra gives no explanation in principle here and only records the matter—as for why it is so, in the single unit of the Middle Part the treatise-author has his own question and answer. What is to be noticed here is that this is the extreme, in the realm of events, of the earlier ‘not giving rise to two minds when the limbs and joints of the body are begged’: there it was not hesitating; here it is actively scattering in all directions.
13. What the Buddha-eye sees, four—removing the suffering of hunger and thirst of the hungry ghosts. 「我以佛眼見十方如恒河沙等國土中諸菩薩摩訶薩除諸餓鬼飢渴苦」 tr. "With the Buddha-eye I see, in lands as many as the sands of the Ganges in the ten directions, bodhisattva-mahāsattvas removing the suffering of hunger and thirst of the hungry ghosts"; the hungry ghosts all love and revere the bodhisattvas, and because of love and reverence they get to leave the hungry-ghost destiny, meet the buddhas, hear the Dharma, cultivate the practice, and little by little by the three vehicles attain parinirvāṇa. The last sentence is where this section lands: 「菩薩摩訶薩為度眾生故,行大悲心。」 tr. "The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, for the sake of delivering beings, practises the mind of great compassion." The suffering of the hungry ghosts lies in hunger and thirst, so what is given is food and drink; it is woven on the same loom as the preceding section's taking the fleshly body as the condition, and here the sūtra explicitly marks the name ‘great compassion’. Among the three evil destinies, the hells are relieved of suffering by supernormal power, the animals have the flesh of the body as their condition, the hungry ghosts are relieved of suffering by food and drink—though what is given differs, the road to deliverance is one: all enter through love and reverence.
14. What the Buddha-eye sees, five—teaching the Dharma in the six heavens of desire and showing fire arising. 「我以佛眼見諸菩薩摩訶薩在四天王天上說法」 tr. "With the Buddha-eye I see bodhisattva-mahāsattvas teaching the Dharma in the Heaven of the Four Heavenly Kings"; in the Heaven of the Thirty-three, the Yāma heaven, the Tuṣita heaven, the Heaven of Delight in Transformation, and the heaven of the gods Sovereign over Others' Transformations they also teach the Dharma; the gods, hearing the Dharma, little by little by the three vehicles attain passing into extinction. Among them are those who crave and cling to the five desires: 「是菩薩示現火起,燒其宮殿,而為說法」 tr. "this bodhisattva shows a fire arising and burning their palaces, and teaches the Dharma for them", saying these words: 「諸天!一切有為法悉皆無常,誰得安者?」 tr. "Gods! All conditioned dharmas are wholly impermanent; who can obtain security?" The sickness of the evil destinies lies in suffering; the sickness of the heavenly destiny lies in pleasure. In the place of suffering, the suffering must first be removed before the Dharma can be taken in; in the place of pleasure, the pleasure must first be destroyed before they can wake up—the fire burning the palaces is not a disaster; it is the preliminary skilful means of teaching the Dharma, and the Dharma taught is only one sentence on impermanence. 「誰得安者」 tr. "who can obtain security" is a question, not a verdict: it lets the gods themselves go looking for that place of secure abiding; when they cannot find it, the principle of impermanence stands up of itself.
15. What the Buddha-eye sees, six—making the Brahmā gods be far from wrong views. 「我以佛眼觀十方世界,見如恒河沙等國土中諸梵天著於邪見」 tr. "With the Buddha-eye I look upon the worlds of the ten directions and see, in lands as many as the sands of the Ganges, Brahmā gods clinging to wrong views"; the bodhisattvas teach them to be far from wrong views, saying these words: 「汝等云何於空相虛妄諸法中而生邪見?」 tr. "Why do you give rise to wrong views within dharmas whose mark is empty and which are false?" And then it concludes: 「菩薩摩訶薩住大慈心,為眾生說法。須菩提!是為諸菩薩希有難及法。」 tr. "The bodhisattva-mahāsattva abides in the mind of great kindness and teaches the Dharma for beings. Subhūti! This is the bodhisattvas' dharma, rare and hard to equal." The Brahmā gods have already parted from the defilement of desire; their sickness lies not in craving pleasure but in views—upon dharmas whose mark is empty and false they falsely reckon real existence, and so wrong views arise. Therefore the medicine used is not supernormal power, not food and drink, not impermanence, but directly pointing out that the dharmas they cling to are from the first empty and void. With this the six things form one series: the hells, extreme suffering; the animals, without knowing; the hungry ghosts, hunger and thirst; the gods, clinging to the five desires; the Brahmā gods, clinging to views; and serving as attendants to the buddhas—told from the suffering of the body to the delusion of the mind, the higher, the subtler the sickness. And as for what runs through the six things, the first five hang on compassion and this one hangs on 「大慈心」 tr. "the mind of great kindness", and the last sentence further gathers all up with 「希有難及法」 tr. "the dharma rare and hard to equal", answering Subhūti's further question in the fifth section.
16. The general heading of gathering in by the four things. The sūtra formally sets up the heading: 「我以佛眼觀十方世界如恒河沙等國土中,諸菩薩摩訶薩以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事。」 tr. "With the Buddha-eye I look upon lands as many as the sands of the Ganges in the worlds of the ten directions, and the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas gather in beings by four things. What are the four? Giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour." The names of the four are here only marked and not yet explained—‘giving’ is giving wealth and Dharma to people; ‘kind speech’ is meeting them with agreeable words; ‘beneficial action’ is encouraging and guiding their practice so that they gain benefit; ‘shared endeavour’ is sharing in what they do and then transforming them. The sūtra's explanation is completed only in the single unit of the Last Part; this unit unfolds only the one gate of giving. The chapter name 「四攝」 tr. "the four means of gathering" comes precisely from these four Chinese characters; and as for why the whole chapter puts giving first and alone treats it broadly, in the single unit of the Middle Part the treatise-author has his own question and answer, which is not anticipated here.
17. Gathering in by giving is of two—the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma. 「云何菩薩以布施攝取眾生?須菩提!菩薩以二種施攝取眾生:財施、法施。」 tr. "How does the bodhisattva gather in beings by giving? Subhūti! The bodhisattva gathers in beings by two kinds of giving: the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma." The division of the two gifts is the skeleton of this section: the gift of wealth gives the things that are needed; the gift of Dharma gives the dharmas to be practised. In the section on the gift of wealth below, the things given are listed first and immediately followed by the dharmas taught; in the section on the gift of Dharma, it is divided into worldly and world-transcending. An arrangement can be seen in advance: the end of the gift of wealth always comes home to teaching the Dharma, the end of the gift of Dharma always comes home to the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows—among the bodhisattva's gifts, not one road stops at the thing given.
18. Gathering in by the gift of wealth—the things given and the dharmas taught. 「何等財施攝取眾生?」 tr. "What is gathering in beings by the gift of wealth?" The sūtra first lists the things: gold, silver, beryl, sphaṭika, pearls, conch-shell, coral, and other precious things, or food and drink, clothing, bedding, dwellings, lamps and candles, flowers, incense, necklaces, or men, or women, or oxen, sheep, elephants, horses, and carriages, or his own body, given to beings; and he tells beings: 「汝等若有所須,各來取之,如取己物,莫得疑難!」 tr. "If you have any need, each of you come and take it, as if taking your own things; have no hesitation!" And then it lists the dharmas: having given, he teaches the three refuges, or teaches the five precepts or the one-day precepts, or teaches the first dhyāna and so on up to the absorption of neither perception nor non-perception, or teaches kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity, or teaches recollection of the Buddha, recollection of the Dharma, recollection of the Saṅgha, recollection of morality, recollection of giving, and recollection of the gods, or teaches the contemplation of impurity and the ānāpāna contemplation, 「或相、或觸」 tr. "or the marks, or contact"; or teaches the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eightfold noble path, the three samādhi, the eight liberations, the nine successive absorptions, the Buddha's ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, the eighteen unshared dharmas, great kindness and great compassion, the thirty-two marks, and the eighty minor marks; or teaches the four fruits of the śramaṇa, the path of the pratyekabuddha, and anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. At the end it gathers up the whole: teaching beings by the power of skilful means, 「財施已,後教令得無上安隱涅槃」 tr. "having given the gift of wealth, he afterwards teaches them and makes them obtain the unsurpassed nirvāṇa of peace and security"; this is named the bodhisattva's dharma rare and hard to equal. The things listed run from precious jewels down to his own body, corresponding to ‘begging the limbs and joints of the body’ in the eighth section—his own body listed at the end of what is given shows exactly where the bottom line of the gift of wealth lies. The dharmas taught begin from the three refuges and the five precepts and rise all the way to unsurpassed awakening, the sequence plainly in view. Among them, the two expressions 「或相、或觸」 tr. "or the marks, or contact", said in close sequence with the ānāpāna contemplation, the sūtra only names and does not explain further; they are the marks to which one is bound and the places that are touched in the practice of mindfulness of the breath; this unit does not force an explanation on them. The joint of the whole section lies in 「財施已,後教令得」 tr. "having given the gift of wealth, he afterwards teaches them and makes them obtain"—wealth is the first step of drawing them in, not the end point of giving.
19. The two kinds of gift of Dharma—worldly and world-transcending. 「須菩提!菩薩云何以法施攝取眾生?須菩提!法施有二種:一者、世間,二者、出世間。」 tr. "Subhūti! How does the bodhisattva gather in beings by the gift of Dharma? Subhūti! The gift of Dharma is of two kinds: first, worldly; second, world-transcending." The worldly gift of Dharma is 「敷演、顯示世間法,所謂不淨觀、安那般那念、四禪、四無量心、四無色定」 tr. "setting forth and expounding, disclosing and pointing out worldly dharmas, namely the contemplation of impurity, mindfulness of ānāpāna, the four dhyānas, the four immeasurable minds, and the four formless absorptions", 「及諸餘共凡夫所行法,是名世間法施」 tr. "and the other dharmas practised in common with ordinary people—this is named the worldly gift of Dharma". And the bodhisattva, having made this worldly gift of Dharma, 「以種種因緣教化,令遠離世間法」 tr. "teaches and transforms them by all kinds of causes and conditions and makes them far from worldly dharmas"; when they are far from them, by the power of skilful means he 「令得聖無漏法及聖無漏法果」 tr. "makes them obtain the noble dharma without outflows and the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows". The criterion of this section is the five Chinese characters 「共凡夫所行」 tr. "practised in common with ordinary people": the contemplation of impurity, counting the breaths, the four dhyānas, the four immeasurables, and the four formless absorptions can be cultivated and obtained even by ordinary people and those of the outside paths, so they are included in the worldly. And when the bodhisattva gives these worldly dharmas, his intent is not to make people abide in them—first he gives them, then makes them part from them, and then imparts the world-transcending. It is wholly the same in structure as the section on the gift of wealth: first give him what he wants, then give him what he ought to want.
20. The noble dharma without outflows and the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows. The sūtra sets itself two questions: 「何等是聖無漏法?何等是聖無漏法果?」 tr. "What is the noble dharma without outflows? What is the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows?" First it answers: 「聖無漏法者,三十七助道法、三解脫門。聖無漏法果者,須陀洹果乃至阿羅漢果,辟支佛道,阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」 tr. "The noble dharma without outflows is the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path and the three gates of liberation. The fruit of the noble dharma without outflows is the fruit of the srota-āpanna and so on up to the fruit of the arhat, the path of the pratyekabuddha, and anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi." And then it says it once more, on the bodhisattva's own side: the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's noble dharma without outflows is the wisdom within the four fruits of the śramaṇa, the wisdom within the path of the pratyekabuddha, the wisdom within the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path, the wisdom within the six perfections, and so on up to the wisdom within great kindness and great compassion—all such dharmas as these, 「若世間若出世間智慧、若有漏若無漏、若有為若無為,是法中一切種智,是名菩薩摩訶薩聖無漏法」 tr. "whether worldly or world-transcending wisdom, whether with outflows or without outflows, whether conditioned or unconditioned: the omniscience of all kinds within these dharmas—this is named the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's noble dharma without outflows". Its fruit is: 「斷一切煩惱習,是名聖無漏法果。」 tr. "Cutting off all the afflictions and their habitual residues—this is named the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows." The difference between the two answers must be seen clearly: the first answer speaks generally of what the three vehicles share; the second is the meaning peculiar to the bodhisattva's side—the bodhisattva's noble dharma without outflows is not the thirty-seven limbs of the path themselves, but the omniscience of all kinds that arises pervading all dharmas (whether worldly or world-transcending, with or without outflows, conditioned or unconditioned); and its fruit too does not stop at cutting off the afflictions but lies in 「斷一切煩惱習」 tr. "cutting off all the afflictions and their habitual residues", cutting off completely even the last embers of the habitual residues. This answers precisely Subhūti's question in the first section: the distinctions of wholesome and unwholesome, worldly and world-transcending, with and without outflows, conditioned and unconditioned, far from hindering prajñā, are precisely the sphere the omniscience of all kinds illumines.
21. Subhūti's two questions—does the bodhisattva obtain the omniscience of all kinds, and what difference is there between the bodhisattva and the Buddha. Subhūti says to the Buddha: 「菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智不?」 tr. "Does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva obtain the omniscience of all kinds?" The Buddha says: 「如是!如是!須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智。」 tr. "Just so! Just so! Subhūti! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva obtains the omniscience of all kinds." Subhūti asks again: 「菩薩與佛有何等異?」 tr. "What difference is there between the bodhisattva and the Buddha?" The Buddha says: 「有異。菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智,是名為佛。所以者何?菩薩心與佛心無有異。」 tr. "There is a difference. The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, having obtained the omniscience of all kinds, is named Buddha. Why? The bodhisattva's mind and the Buddha's mind are without difference." And then he continues: 「菩薩住是一切種智中,於一切法無不照明,是名菩薩摩訶薩世間法施。須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩因世間法施,得出世間法施。」 tr. "The bodhisattva abides within this omniscience of all kinds, and there is nothing among all dharmas that he does not illumine; this is named the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's worldly gift of Dharma. Subhūti! Because of the worldly gift of Dharma the bodhisattva-mahāsattva obtains the world-transcending gift of Dharma." These two questions are linked like a chain: since above it was said that the bodhisattva's noble dharma without outflows is precisely the omniscience of all kinds, then is the bodhisattva not simply the Buddha? Subhūti raises this pressing question on the reader's behalf. The Buddha answers with great measure—first he says 「有異」 tr. "there is a difference", yet he speaks of the difference not in the mind but in the name: having obtained the omniscience of all kinds he is named Buddha, while the mind is without difference. What differs is name, status, and rank; what does not differ is the mind that realises. This answer is of one vein with the earlier 「一切法不異、不分別」 tr. "all dharmas are not different and without discrimination": even the difference between bodhisattva and Buddha falls only on the names and words of worldly truth. At the end the talk is brought back to the gift of Dharma: abiding in the omniscience of all kinds, and there being nothing among all dharmas that he does not illumine—this is the bodhisattva's worldly gift of Dharma; only when one illumines clearly can one give; and that the world-transcending gift of Dharma is brought forth from the worldly gift of Dharma is exactly the same sequence as ‘first give them, then make them part from it’ in the section above.
22. The general heading of the world-transcending dharmas not shared with ordinary people. 「須菩提!何等是菩薩出世間法不共凡夫法同?」 tr. "Subhūti! What are the bodhisattva's world-transcending dharmas, not the same as the dharmas of ordinary people?" The sūtra lists the headings: the four foundations of mindfulness, the four right efforts, the four bases of supernormal power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven limbs of awakening, the eightfold noble path, the three gates of liberation, the eight liberations, the nine successive absorptions, the Buddha's ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, the eighteen unshared dharmas, the thirty-two marks, the eighty minor marks, and the five hundred dhāraṇī gates—「是名出世間法」 tr. "these are named world-transcending dharmas". This list stands in direct contrast with 「共凡夫所行法」 tr. "the dharmas practised in common with ordinary people" in the nineteenth section: there the criterion was being shared with ordinary people, here it is not being shared with ordinary people. It is worth noticing that the thirty-two marks and the eighty minor marks are also listed among the 「不共」 tr. "unshared"—the marks and minor signs are in themselves form-dharmas; why do they enter the number of the world-transcending and unshared? The sūtra does not explain this here; in the single unit of the Middle Part the treatise-author has his own question and answer. What follows unfolds item by item, and is the longest stretch of this unit; since the sūtra names item by item and then itself explains item by item, here the explanation follows what it explains, and where it only names and does not explain, nothing is forcibly added either.
23. The four foundations of mindfulness. 「菩薩摩訶薩觀內身循身觀、觀外身循身觀、觀內外身循身觀,勤精進,以一心智慧觀身、觀身集因緣、觀身滅、觀身集生滅;行是道,無所依,於世間無所愛。受、心、法念處,亦如是。」 tr. "The bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates the inner body, contemplating by following the body through; contemplates the outer body, contemplating by following the body through; contemplates the inner-and-outer body, contemplating by following the body through; diligently and with vigour, with the wisdom of a single mind, he contemplates the body, contemplates the causes and conditions of the body's arising, contemplates the cessation of the body, contemplates the arising of the body together with its birth and cessation; practising this path, he has nothing he relies on, and toward the world he has nothing he craves. The foundations of mindfulness of feeling, of mind, and of dharmas are also like this." ‘Contemplating by following the body through’ is contemplating the body with respect to the body, not leaving the object contemplated to raise imaginings elsewhere; inner, outer, and inner-and-outer are one's own body, others' bodies, and both contemplated together. Then the four turns—contemplating the body, contemplating the causes and conditions by which the body arises, contemplating the cessation of the body, contemplating the body's arising together with its birth and cessation—are seeing, from the mark now present, how it comes and how it goes. The last two phrases are why the bodhisattva's foundation of mindfulness differs from ordinary people's contemplation of the body: 「無所依」 tr. "he has nothing he relies on" is not taking a footing on the dharma contemplated; 「於世間無所愛」 tr. "toward the world he has nothing he craves" is the contemplation accomplished and yet not grasped. The three foundations of mindfulness of feeling, mind, and dharmas the sūtra exemplifies with 「亦如是」 tr. "are also like this".
24. The four right efforts. 「未生惡不善法,為不生故,勤、生欲、精進;已生惡不善法,為斷故,勤、生欲、精進;未生善法,為生故,勤、生欲、精進;已生諸善法,為增長修具足故,勤、生欲、精進;是名四正勤。」 tr. "For evil and unwholesome dharmas not yet arisen, in order that they not arise, he strives diligently, gives rise to desire, and is vigorous; for evil and unwholesome dharmas already arisen, in order to cut them off, he strives diligently, gives rise to desire, and is vigorous; for wholesome dharmas not yet arisen, in order that they arise, he strives diligently, gives rise to desire, and is vigorous; for the wholesome dharmas already arisen, in order to increase them, cultivate them, and make them complete, he strives diligently, gives rise to desire, and is vigorous; this is named the four right efforts." The four things divide into two pairs: evil dharmas not yet arisen and already arisen, answered by not arising and by cutting off; wholesome dharmas not yet arisen and already arisen, answered by arising and by increasing, cultivating, and making complete. Every one of them is bound to the same three terms—「勤、生欲、精進」 tr. "striving diligently, giving rise to desire, being vigorous": striving diligently is spurring on, giving rise to desire is raising a mind of glad wishing, being vigorous is continuing without falling back. The crucial point is 「生欲」 tr. "giving rise to desire": right effort is not forcing oneself to hold on; it is first to raise the mind that wants to do it, for the strength of compulsion cannot last long.
25. The four bases of supernormal power. 「欲三昧斷行成就初如意足,精進三昧、心三昧、思惟三昧斷行成就如意足。」 tr. "The first basis of supernormal power, accomplished by the samādhi of desire and the practice of cutting off; and the bases of supernormal power accomplished by the samādhi of vigour, the samādhi of mind, and the samādhi of reflection and the practice of cutting off." The four are distinguished by desire, vigour, mind, and reflection, and all take 「三昧」 tr. "samādhi" as their substance and 「斷行成就」 tr. "accomplished by the practice of cutting off" as their cultivation. Desire is glad wishing, vigour is exertion, mind is one-pointedness, reflection is investigation; by four gates one enters absorption, each following its own strength. ‘The practice of cutting off’ is cutting off the practices that go against or along with it, so that the absorption is accomplished. Here the sūtra is extremely brief: it only marks their names and the mark of their accomplishment, and does not further explain their function.
26. The five faculties and the five powers. 「云何為五根?信根、精進根、念根、定根、慧根。」 tr. "What are the five faculties? The faculty of faith, the faculty of vigour, the faculty of mindfulness, the faculty of concentration, the faculty of wisdom." 「云何為五力?信力、精進力、念力、定力、慧力。」 tr. "What are the five powers? The power of faith, the power of vigour, the power of mindfulness, the power of concentration, the power of wisdom." The two share the same names under different designations: the five things faith, vigour, mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom are named ‘faculties’ with respect to their being able to give rise to wholesome dharmas, and named ‘powers’ with respect to their not being destroyed. Here the sūtra only lists their names and does not further explain their marks—since these names are, together with the four foundations of mindfulness and what follows, items of the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path, their meaning lies of itself in the way the items run through one another; this unit explains according to what the sūtra has, and does not add according to what the sūtra does not have.
27. The seven limbs of awakening. 「念覺分、擇法覺分、精進覺分、喜覺分、除息覺分、定覺分、捨覺分。」 tr. "The mindfulness limb of awakening, the limb of awakening that investigates dharmas, the vigour limb of awakening, the joy limb of awakening, the removal-and-rest limb of awakening, the concentration limb of awakening, the equanimity limb of awakening." These seven too are only listed by name. As to the literal meaning of each: mindfulness is binding the mind without forgetting; investigating dharmas is sorting the true from the false; vigour is spurring on without falling back; joy is joy in the Dharma; removal-and-rest is removing coarse heaviness so that body and mind are light and at ease; concentration is the mind's one-pointedness on its object; equanimity is not grasping, not clinging, and being even. 「覺分」 tr. "limb of awakening" means a branch that accomplishes awakening. The sūtra does not explain here, so nothing further is set out.
28. The eightfold noble path. 「正見、正思惟、正語、正業、正命、正精進、正念、正定。」 tr. "Right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right vigour, right mindfulness, right concentration." These eight too are only listed by name. View and thought belong to wisdom; speech, action, and livelihood belong to morality; vigour, mindfulness, and concentration belong to concentration—the three trainings of morality, concentration, and wisdom are here divided into eight limbs. Since the sūtra does not explain them separately, here too the explanation stops at rendering their names in present-day language.
29. The three samādhi. 「云何為三三昧?空三昧門,無相、無作三昧門。」 tr. "What are the three samādhi? The gate of the emptiness samādhi, and the gate of the signless and the non-action samādhi." And then it explains each itself: 「云何為空三昧?以空行、無我行攝心,是名空三昧。」 tr. "What is the emptiness samādhi? Holding the mind by the practice of emptiness and the practice of non-self—this is named the emptiness samādhi." 「云何為無相三昧?以寂滅行、離行攝心,是為無相三昧。」 tr. "What is the signless samādhi? Holding the mind by the practice of quiescent extinction and the practice of separation—this is the signless samādhi." 「云何為無作三昧?無常行、苦行攝心,是為無作三昧。」 tr. "What is the non-action samādhi? Holding the mind by the practice of impermanence and the practice of suffering—this is the non-action samādhi." All three take 「攝心」 tr. "holding the mind" as the mark of accomplishment, yet the practices held differ: the emptiness samādhi with the two practices of emptiness and non-self, breaking dharmas and the self; the signless samādhi with the two practices of quiescent extinction and separation, stilling all marks; the non-action samādhi with the two practices of impermanence and suffering, cutting off the wishing and seeking of fabrication. Unlike the items listed above, for these three the sūtra itself explains their practices, so their meaning has explicit text to rely on. They are called 「門」 tr. "gate" because the three are the doorways for entering liberation.
30. The eight liberations. 「內色相外觀色,是初背捨;內無色相外觀色,是二背捨;淨背捨,是三背捨;過一切色相,滅一切對相,不念一切異相故,觀無邊虛空,入無邊空處;乃至過一切非有想非無想處,入滅受想背捨。是名八背捨。」 tr. "Having the mark of form within, he contemplates form without—this is the first liberation; not having the mark of form within, he contemplates form without—this is the second liberation; the liberation of purity—this is the third liberation; passing beyond all marks of form, eliminating all marks of resistance, and because of not thinking of all different marks, he contemplates boundless space and enters the sphere of boundless space; and so on up to passing beyond all of the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception, he enters the liberation of the cessation of feeling and perception. This is named the eight liberations." The difference between the first two liberations lies in whether the inner mind still keeps the perception of form or is already without the perception of form, while both take outer form as what is contemplated; the third, the liberation of purity, turns to contemplating pure form. From the fourth on are the four formless absorptions: passing beyond the marks of form, eliminating the marks of resistance and obstruction, not thinking of the various different marks, one enters the sphere of boundless space, and so on up to the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception; the eighth is the liberation of the cessation of feeling and perception. The name 「背捨」 tr. "liberation" comes from its very matter—turning one's back on and giving up, layer after layer giving up what one clings to.
31. The nine successive absorptions. 「行者離欲、惡不善法,有覺有觀,離生喜樂,入初禪;第二、第三、第四禪;乃至過非有想非無想處,入滅受想定。是名九次第定。」 tr. "The practitioner, having parted from desires and from evil and unwholesome dharmas, with initial thought and with sustained thought, with joy and pleasure born of separation, enters the first dhyāna; the second, the third, and the fourth dhyāna; and so on up to passing beyond the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception, he enters the absorption of the cessation of feeling and perception. This is named the nine successive absorptions." The four dhyānas, the four formless absorptions, and the absorption of the cessation of feeling and perception make nine together; 「次第」 tr. "in sequence" means entering in order, not skipping stages. For the first dhyāna the sūtra gives its marks in full—parting from desire and from evil and unwholesome dharmas, with initial and sustained thought, joy and pleasure born of separation—and the rest it exemplifies with 「乃至」 tr. "and so on up to". What it covers overlaps much with the eight liberations of the preceding section, but the intent of the naming differs: there it takes their turning away from and giving up what is clung to, here their entering in sequence.
32. The Buddha's ten powers. The sūtra lists them one by one: 「是處、不是處,如實知」 tr. "what can be and what cannot be, he knows as it really is"—knowing what in principle may be and what in principle cannot be; knowing beings' past, future, and present deeds and dharmas of receiving, knowing the place where deeds are done, knowing their causes and conditions, knowing their retribution—the power concerning deeds and retribution; knowing as it really is the marks of defilement, purity, and distinction of the meditative concentrations, liberations, samādhi, and absorptions—the power concerning meditative concentration; 「知他眾生諸根上下相」 tr. "he knows the higher and lower marks of the faculties of other beings"—the keenness and dullness of faculties; 「知他眾生種種欲解」 tr. "he knows the various desires and resolute understandings of other beings"—the difference between glad wishing and resolute understanding; 「知一切世間種種無數性」 tr. "he knows the various innumerable natures of all the world"—the immeasurability of the kinds of nature of beings; 「知一切到道相」 tr. "he knows the marks of all the paths that lead everywhere"—all the paths that can arrive; 「知種種宿命,一世乃至無量劫,如實知」 tr. "he knows all kinds of former lives, from one life up to immeasurable kalpas, as it really is"—the power concerning former lives; 「天眼見眾生,乃至生善惡道」 tr. "with the divine eye he sees beings, and so on up to their being born in good destinies and evil destinies"—the power of the divine eye; 「漏盡故,無漏心解脫,如實知」 tr. "because the outflows are exhausted, the mind without outflows is liberated, and he knows this as it really is"—the power of the exhaustion of outflows. 「是為佛十力。」 tr. "These are the Buddha's ten powers." Of what the ten powers know, the first three hang on the principle of dharmas and on beings' deeds and absorptions, the middle four on beings' faculties, natures, desires, understandings, and paths, the next two on the beginning and end of birth and death in the three times, and the last one on his own realisation. They are called 「力」 tr. "powers" because they know and nothing can destroy them, nothing can bend them.
33. The four fearlessnesses. The sūtra says them four times in the same sentence pattern: the Buddha makes a truthful declaration, 「我是一切正智人」 tr. "I am a person of all right knowledge"; if there is a śramaṇa, a brahmin, a god, Māra, Brahmā, or any other assembly that says in accordance with fact 「是法不知」 tr. "this dharma you do not know", 「乃至不見是微畏相」 tr. "and so on up to his not seeing even the slightest mark of anything to fear"; for this reason he obtains security and obtains fearlessness, abides in the place of the holy lord, roars the lion's roar in the great assembly, and can turn the Brahmā wheel, while those assemblies 「實不能轉」 tr. "truly cannot turn it"—this is the first fearlessness. In the next three rounds, what is truthfully declared is in turn 「我一切漏盡」 tr. "all my outflows are exhausted", 「我說障法」 tr. "I proclaim the dharmas that obstruct", and 「我所說聖道,能出世間;隨是行,能盡苦」 tr. "the holy path that I teach can lead out of the world; practising in accordance with this, one can bring suffering to an end", and the difficulties posed are in turn 「是漏不盡」 tr. "these outflows are not exhausted", 「受是法不障道」 tr. "receiving this dharma does not obstruct the path", and 「行是道不能出世間、不能盡苦」 tr. "practising this path one cannot leave the world and cannot bring suffering to an end". What the four face are precisely the four places where one who teaches the Dharma may be challenged: what is known, what is cut off, what is blocked, and what is practised. And the Buddha's fearlessness is spoken of not in terms of refuting the other side but in terms of 「乃至不見是微畏相」 tr. "and so on up to his not seeing even the slightest mark of anything to fear"—not even the shadow of a trace of timidity can be found; only this is the reality of fearlessness.
34. The four unobstructed knowledges. 「一者、義無礙智,二者、法無礙智,三者、辭無礙智,四者、樂說無礙智。」 tr. "First, the unobstructed knowledge of meaning; second, the unobstructed knowledge of dharmas; third, the unobstructed knowledge of expression; fourth, the unobstructed knowledge of delight in speaking." The sūtra explains each itself, and all its explanations take the same sentence pattern: 「緣義智慧,是為義無礙智」 tr. "the wisdom that takes meaning as its object—this is the unobstructed knowledge of meaning", and likewise for dharmas, expression, and delight in speaking—each named by what it takes as its object. Meaning is the principle that is expressed, dharmas are the teaching that expresses it, expression is fluency in words, delight in speaking is the inexhaustibility of teaching the Dharma in response to capacities. Taken together, the four are the fourfold penetration of one who teaches the Dharma: penetration of principle, of teaching, of words, and of responding to capacities. The sūtra's explanation is extremely brief, only pointing out ‘the wisdom that arises taking such-and-such as its object’, without further dividing their marks.
35. The eighteen unshared dharmas. The sūtra lists them item by item: the buddhas' bodies are without fault, speech without fault, mindfulness without fault, without different perceptions, without an unconcentrated mind, without a mind that lets go without knowing—these six concern the Buddha's three kinds of deeds and his mind: body, speech, and mind are all without fault, there are no different perceptions, there is no mind that has not entered absorption, there is no mind that lets go without first having come to know; desire without decline, vigour without decline, mindfulness without decline, wisdom without decline, liberation without decline, the knowledge and vision of liberation without decline—these six concern the non-retreating of his virtues: the six things are all without decline or loss; all bodily deeds proceed following wisdom, all deeds of speech proceed following wisdom, all mental deeds proceed following wisdom—these three concern the three kinds of deeds all being led by wisdom; wisdom knows the past world without obstruction, knows the future world without obstruction, knows the present world without obstruction—these three concern knowledge of the three times being without obstruction. The eighteen things together are all not shared with śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas. The first six are being without fault, the middle six being without decline, the last six following wisdom and being without obstruction—from being without fault to not retreating, from not retreating to knowing everywhere.
36. The thirty-two marks. The sūtra lists the marks one by one, all thirty-two complete: the soles of the feet stand level and even, as level as the bottom of a casket; under the soles of the feet are thousand-spoked wheels with rims, the wheel-marks complete; the fingers and toes long, surpassing other people; the hands and feet soft, surpassing the other parts of the body; the heels broad, complete, full, and fine; between the fingers and toes there is webbing, surpassing other people; the insteps high, level, and fine, matching the heels; the shanks like those of the king of the yiniyan deer, slender and fine; when standing level both hands can stroke the knees; the mark of the hidden private parts like a horse-king or an elephant-king; the body's height and breadth equal, like the nijulu tree; from each single pore a single hair grows, blue in colour, soft, and turning to the right; the body hairs point upward, blue in colour, soft, and turning to the right; the golden-coloured mark, its colour subtle and wonderful, surpassing jambūnada gold; the light of the body one zhang on each of the four sides; the skin thin, fine, and smooth, receiving no dust or dirt, and mosquitoes and gnats do not settle on it; the seven places full—under both soles, in both palms, on both shoulders, and in the middle of the neck, all full, and the letter-marks distinct; under both armpits full; the upper body like a lion; the body broad and upright; the shoulders round and fine; forty teeth; the teeth white, even, close-set, and deep-rooted; four teeth whitest and large; square jaws like a lion; among flavours he obtains the supreme flavour, and at two places in the throat saliva flows out; the tongue large, soft, and thin, able to cover the face up to the hairline at the ears; the Brahmā voice deep and far-reaching, like the sound of the kalaviṅka; the colour of the eyes like the essence of gold; the eyelashes like those of the ox-king; the mark of the white hair between the eyebrows, soft and white like douluo cotton; the topknot on the crown made of flesh. At the end it sums them up: 「是三十二相,佛身成就。」 tr. "These thirty-two marks are what the Buddha's body accomplishes." Among the thirty-two things, many take beast-kings, trees, cotton, and gold as similes—virtue is not spoken of in abstract words; the form is described by the highest things of the world. That the marks and minor signs are listed here among the world-transcending unshared dharmas is precisely the manifestation in the form-body of the earlier 「聖無漏法果」 tr. "fruit of the noble dharma without outflows"; as for why the marks and minor signs can be named world-transcending and unshared, in the single unit of the Middle Part the treatise-author has his own question and answer.
37. The light illumining everywhere and the voice pervading everywhere. At the end of the single unit, the sūtra closes with two things: 「光明遍照三千大千世界,若欲廣照,則遍滿十方無量阿僧祇世界,為眾生故受丈光」 tr. "His light illumines all the three-thousand great-thousand world; if he wishes to illumine broadly, it pervades the immeasurable asaṃkhyeya worlds of the ten directions; for the sake of beings he takes on a light of one zhang"; if he emits immeasurable light, then there are no sun and moon, seasons, or years. 「佛音聲遍滿三千大千世界,若欲大聲,則遍滿十方無量阿僧祇世界;隨眾多少,音聲遍至。」 tr. "The Buddha's voice pervades the three-thousand great-thousand world; if he wishes a great sound, it pervades the immeasurable asaṃkhyeya worlds of the ten directions; according to how many or how few are in the assembly, the voice reaches everywhere." The two things share one structure: the original measure pervades the immeasurable worlds of the ten directions, while what is taken on at present is no more than a light of one zhang and a voice that follows the assembly. Why he limits himself, the sūtra says plainly—「為眾生故受丈光」 tr. "for the sake of beings he takes on a light of one zhang"; if the light were immeasurable, then sun and moon, seasons, and years would all be absent, and beings would have nothing to rely on and could not abide. Light and voice are the functions of the Buddha's body; their gathering in and letting out all follow what beings can bear, of exactly the same purport as the earlier 「隨其所應而攝取之」 tr. "he gathers them in according to what is fitting for them". The single unit begins with 「攝取」 tr. "gathering in" and ends with light and voice reaching according to the assembly, head and tail answering each other.
Do Not Misread
Do not read 「等一布施」 tr. "one and the same giving" as not distinguishing good and evil and not discerning the object. What the sūtra blocks is the picking-and-choosing mind arising at the time of giving—「佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養」 tr. "The Buddha is a field of merit, I should make offerings; birds and beasts are not a field of merit, I should not make offerings"—and the reason is 「一切法不異、不分別故」 tr. "because all dharmas are not different and without discrimination", and what is sought is 「無分別法報,所謂一切種智」 tr. "the retribution of the dharma without discrimination, namely the omniscience of all kinds". This is said of the mind in the cause; it does not say that in retribution fields of merit have no superior and inferior. The bodhisattva's giving is not established on seeking merit, and therefore he does not pick and choose; if it is read as making offerings to the Buddha and feeding beasts having wholly equal merit, then the principle of worldly truth is wiped out along with it—while this chapter, from beginning to end, is speaking precisely of how, within ultimate emptiness, the distinctions of worldly truth are not destroyed.
Do not read the Buddha's answer to Subhūti's question as ‘emptiness is false’. The Buddha first raises ordinary people giving rise to the three kinds of deeds within dreams and conjurations, not in order to withdraw the meaning of emptiness: what the bodhisattva then teaches is still 「是中無陰、入、界,無夢亦無見夢者」 tr. "within this there are no aggregates, no sense-fields, no elements; there is no dream and also no one who sees the dream", still 「一切法無根本實性無所有」 tr. "all dharmas are without root, without real nature, without anything existent". What is established is ‘though dharmas are without anything existent, on the side of ordinary people they come to be existent’—what exists is not dharmas but inversion. If it is read as the Buddha acknowledging that dharmas really exist, then the later section 「住是諸空布施」 tr. "abiding in these emptinesses he gives" has nowhere to settle.
Do not read the bodhisattva's giving up his body, being cut and severed, and scattering in all directions as a practice of seeking suffering. The effect the sūtra records is 「皆愛敬菩薩;以愛敬故,即得離畜生道」 tr. "they all love and revere the bodhisattvas; because of love and reverence, they at once get to leave the animal destiny"—giving up the body is in order to join up a stretch of causes and conditions that had no gate of Dharma by which to enter; the weight lies in the benefit brought about, not in the suffering undergone. Likewise, what the section on ‘begging the limbs and joints of the body’ blocks is the two minds of 「若與?若不與?」 tr. "Shall I give? Or shall I not give?", not teaching people to seek others to come and beg. If it is read as taking self-inflicted suffering as virtue, it goes against the no giving and no taking away of 「住是諸空布施」 tr. "abiding in these emptinesses he gives" in the ninth section.
Do not read the answer to 「菩薩與佛有何等異」 tr. "what difference is there between the bodhisattva and the Buddha" as the bodhisattva simply being the Buddha. The Buddha answers plainly 「有異」 tr. "there is a difference", and the reason there is a difference lies in the name—「得一切種智,是名為佛」 tr. "having obtained the omniscience of all kinds, he is named Buddha"; the reason there is no difference lies in the mind—「菩薩心與佛心無有異」 tr. "the bodhisattva's mind and the Buddha's mind are without difference". The difference lies in name and rank, the non-difference in what is realised; the two statements must be read together. Taking only 「無有異」 tr. "without difference" and leaving out 「有異」 tr. "there is a difference" wipes out the distinctions of worldly truth; taking only 「有異」 tr. "there is a difference" and leaving out 「心無有異」 tr. "the mind is without difference" makes the earlier sentence 「一切法不異、不分別」 tr. "all dharmas are not different and without discrimination" fall empty again.
Do not read the marks and minor signs among the ‘world-transcending dharmas not shared with ordinary people’ as worldly beauty. The thirty-two marks are listed among the unshared with respect to their being the retribution of the noble dharma without outflows; here the sūtra only lists them and does not explain, and why it is so is made clear only in the treatise-author's questions and answers in the single unit of the Middle Part. Here one should keep to what the sūtra has: since it has not explained, do not judge in advance; since they are listed among the unshared, do not read them with the view of worldly marks and minor signs.
Bearing on Practice
Use the sentence 「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者」 tr. "ordinary foolish people find the dream and find the one who sees the dream" to check your own contemplation of emptiness. The sickness that people learning emptiness most easily fall into is thinking that, having understood emptiness, one can disregard deeds. The sūtra's first move is exactly this: deeds in the dream truly arise, retribution in the dream is truly received. If the meaning of emptiness makes a person take good and evil lightly, that is not the meaning of emptiness; it is using emptiness as an excuse. Whenever you feel ‘anyway it is all empty’, take up this sentence and shine it on yourself—who is it that, in the dream, gives rise to deeds of body, speech, and mind?
Use the two Chinese characters 「拔出」 tr. "pull out" to regard every good thing now present. The sūtra says he pulls them out from stinginess and makes them give, pulls them out again from the great reward of merit and makes them keep morality, pulls them out again from the retribution of keeping morality and makes them cultivate absorption—the retribution of the preceding step is precisely where the next step must pull away from. When one tastes sweetness at some step of practice, it is easiest to settle down there. Take up this section and ask yourself: this share of security I am now guarding—is it a place to be pulled out of, or have I already taken it as my home?
Use 「二心」 tr. "two minds" as the self-examination at the time of giving. What the sūtra blocks is not not giving, but that thought which wavers between 「若與?若不與?」 tr. "Shall I give? Or shall I not give?" Whenever someone asks for something—wealth, time, the strength of heart and mind—first see whether that one-second calculation has arisen in your mind. If it has arisen, there is no need to blame yourself; to recognise it as precisely the sickness this section points to is already awareness; over time, the decision to give or not to give can still be made according to principle, and that stretch of wavering will grow shorter and shorter.
Use 「誰與、誰受?所施何物?」 tr. "Who gives, who receives? What thing is given?" to settle the mind after giving. After doing a good deed, the hardest thing to deal with is the self that did the good deed. What the sūtra gives is not the empty talk of ‘do not cling’ but three questions: who is the giver, who is the recipient, what thing is given. When the matter is done, take them up and ask yourself once through; when none of the three questions finds a footing, that share of self-satisfaction falls away of itself—not pressed down, but seen to have had nowhere to stand from the first.
Treat people by the sequence of the three things—rescuing from urgency, recognising the capacity, imparting the Dharma. The bodhisattva entering the hells first by supernormal power makes the fire go out and the boiling water grow cold, next knows others' minds, and then teaches the Dharma. People in urgent distress cannot take in reasons; this is the ordinary way of things. Seeing someone suffering, first find a way to stop the suffering; when the suffering has eased a little, first understand where the person's mind tends; once the capacity is known, only then can one speak of teaching the Dharma. If the sequence is reversed, good words become a burden.
Use 「為眾生故受丈光」 tr. "for the sake of beings he takes on a light of one zhang" to examine the measure of your teaching and of what you show to others. The Buddha's light could from the first pervade the immeasurable worlds of the ten directions, yet for the sake of beings he takes on only one zhang; his voice could from the first pervade the ten directions, yet it reaches according to how many or how few are in the assembly. The able limiting themselves is not hiding clumsiness; it is not leaving people with nothing to rely on. Whenever you know something or can do something and wish to show it to others, first ask one sentence: how much can be borne here? Beyond what can be borne, even light becomes an obstruction.
Further Resonances
In the single unit of the First Part there is sūtra and no treatise—the earlier part of the sūtra text of this chapter is all here, and the treatise-author's explanation begins from the single unit of the Middle Part. So what is carried forward here is the sūtra text's own foreshadowing and what the ancient masters' structural divisions judge.
In this unit the sūtra leaves three plain foreshadowings, all waiting for the Middle Part and the Last Part to complete them. First, the matters of giving up the body and being cut and severed in the eighth and twelfth sections: the sūtra only records the matters and their effects, and does not explain the principle of ‘why beings who eat the bodhisattva's flesh are, on the contrary, delivered’ or ‘why the bodhisattva does not give rise to anger or regret’. Second, the thirty-two marks and the eighty minor marks are listed among the ‘world-transcending dharmas not shared with ordinary people’, which the sūtra only lists and does not explain, while the marks and minor signs are in themselves shared by the wheel-turning sage king and others, and why they are called unshared is not said. Third, the dharma of the four means of gathering marks in general the four things—giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour—while this unit opens only the one gate of giving, the three things from kind speech on are not explained, and within giving, why the gift of wealth is treated briefly and the gift of Dharma broadly is also not said. All three are places where the treatise-author questions and answers in the Middle Part and the Last Part, and are not anticipated here.
Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra has a structural division of the whole chapter, and what it judges for the single unit of the First Part is as follows. It judges the general position of this chapter, saying: 「此下第二明外化方便。前是內行方便,亦前是自行今是化他,由內行滿足故能外益生。」 tr. "From here down, second, the skilful means of transforming outwardly is made clear. The preceding was the skilful means of inner practice; also, the preceding was one's own practice, and now it is transforming others; because inner practice is complete, one can benefit the living outwardly." And then it divides this chapter into two: 「初品為二:第一明菩薩化攝無邊為益無量,第二明菩薩雖能廣利不存化功。」 tr. "The first chapter is in two: first, it makes clear that the bodhisattva's transforming and gathering are boundless and his benefit immeasurable; second, it makes clear that though the bodhisattva can benefit broadly, he does not keep the merit of transforming." Again it divides the former part further into two: 「初為二:第一明生身方便益物,第二明法身菩提化物遍滿十方也。」 tr. "The first is in two: first, it makes clear the benefiting of beings by the skilful means of the fleshly body; second, it makes clear that the awakening of the Dharma body transforms beings, pervading the ten directions." On why Subhūti's first question is asked again, it lists three meanings from older sayings: 「昔論有三義生起:一者云上來已作此問,今更問者,無始來有所得病難破故也。二者說經將訖,空是入道之要,如云離三解脫問無知無見,是故更問空義也。三者、佛在世眾利根易悟,佛滅度五百歲後眾生鈍根難悟,多生著心,聞說空便言:若空如夢幻者,何以有善惡報耶?須菩提愍末世眾生,是故問也。」 tr. "The older discussions give three meanings for how this arises. First, it says that this question was already asked above; it is asked again now because the sickness of having something to be attained, from beginningless time, is hard to break. Second, the sūtra is about to close, and emptiness is the essential for entering the path—as it says, apart from the three liberations one asks about not-knowing and not-seeing—therefore the meaning of emptiness is asked again. Third, while the Buddha was in the world the assembly were of keen faculties and awakened easily; five hundred years after the Buddha's passing into extinction, beings are of dull faculties and awaken with difficulty, and many give rise to a clinging mind; hearing emptiness spoken of, they then say: if emptiness is like a dream or an illusion, why is there the retribution of good and evil? Subhūti pitied the beings of the final age, and therefore asked." And it distinguishes the answer of this chapter from the answer of the preceding chapter: 「上品末答明無所有破病,今品答明法雖無所有於凡夫有也。」 tr. "The answer at the end of the preceding chapter makes clear that there is nothing existent, so as to break the sickness; the answer of this chapter makes clear that though dharmas are without anything existent, for ordinary people they exist." Its explanation of the section on the pulling out in sequence by skilful means says: 「先於慳中拔出令持戒,持戒是中根人故;次於戒中拔出令修定,如是於三界拔出令得二乘,二乘中拔出令得大乘,大乘中拔出令悟無三無一。」 tr. "First he pulls them out from stinginess and makes them keep morality, because keeping morality is for people of middling faculties; next he pulls them out from morality and makes them cultivate absorption; thus he pulls them out from the three realms and makes them obtain the two vehicles, pulls them out from the two vehicles and makes them obtain the Great Vehicle, pulls them out from the Great Vehicle and makes them awaken to there being neither three nor one." Its division of outer giving in the section on giving says: 「外施中為二:初、正明平等施為得;次、明簡擇施為失。」 tr. "Within outer giving there are two: first, it properly makes clear that equal giving is a gain; next, it makes clear that picking-and-choosing giving is a loss." Its division of the six things seen by the Buddha-eye says: 「次我以佛眼下,第二、引證。」 tr. "Next, from ‘I with the Buddha-eye’ down: second, citing proof." Its division of the heading of the four means of gathering says: 「復次我以佛眼四攝下,第二、明四攝,即四:先釋布施。」 tr. "From ‘Again, I with the Buddha-eye … the four means of gathering’ down: second, the four means of gathering are made clear, which are four; first giving is explained." Its explanation of Subhūti's question ‘does the bodhisattva obtain the omniscience of all kinds’ says: 「此是進退難也。」 tr. "This is a difficulty of advancing and retreating." And it judges the intent of the Buddha's answer: 「當得種智名菩薩,已得種智名佛也。」 tr. "One who is to obtain the knowledge of all kinds is named bodhisattva; one who has obtained the knowledge of all kinds is named Buddha." Its explanation of why the world-transcending gift of Dharma lists the various categories broadly says: 「序品列成為勸學廣,大乘列為成大乘,今列為成法施。」 tr. "The listing in the Introductory chapter is for encouraging broad training; the listing in the Great Vehicle is for accomplishing the Great Vehicle; the present listing is for accomplishing the gift of Dharma." It also sets a question and answer on the marks and minor signs: 「問:三十二相云何是出世間法?答:此是無漏果無漏業日起。」 tr. "Question: how are the thirty-two marks world-transcending dharmas? Answer: these are the fruit without outflows, arising daily from deeds without outflows."
Jizang's division of the section on the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma reads 「初明財施中先明法施,如文也」 tr. "first it makes clear that within the gift of wealth the gift of Dharma is made clear first, as in the text"; yet the order of the sūtra text actually lists first the things of the gift of wealth and afterwards speaks of the two kinds of gift of Dharma, which runs counter to this wording. The extant text is so; it is recorded side by side without judgement.
The extant text of Huiying's Commentary stops in the middle of chapter sixty-nine; for this chapter there is no commentary to carry forward, and his explanation is lacking—it is not that it was passed over without explanation.
In the single unit of the Middle Part, the treatise-author, beginning from ‘above, the emptiness of nature has already been spoken of everywhere; why is the question asked again from the wholesome and the unwholesome?’, explains one by one the questions this unit leaves—the three meanings of the repeated question, not giving rise to two minds when giving up the body, the no giving and no taking away within ultimate emptiness, the four sayings on being cut and severed without anger or regret, why the three evil destinies are not delivered to the last one, why eating the bodhisattva's flesh brings deliverance, why the human destiny is spoken of broadly, why among the four means of gathering giving alone is treated broadly, why within giving the gift of Dharma is spoken of broadly, why Subhūti asks about obtaining the omniscience of all kinds, why the nine successive absorptions and the marks and minor signs are called world-transcending and unshared, why the marks and minor signs are spoken of only when the treatise is about to close, the broad explanation of the Buddha's ten powers, and so on up to the four sayings on whether the thirty-two marks are fixed or not fixed—all coming on from the sūtra text of this unit. The single unit of the Last Part then goes on to speak of the eighty minor marks, and then turns to the three means of gathering—kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour—and to the forty-two gates of letters, finally coming home to the meaning of the nature of dharmas, the two truths, and teaching the Dharma without clinging.