大智度論 歎信行品之上Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · Praise of Practising in Faith, Part 1 of 2
歎信行品之上:聞般若能信者宿植德本;禮般若即禮一切智;不住不習;受記先相四譬喻;善付菩薩事(經+論)
這一品從天主的一個念頭開始。帝釋作是念:「若善男子、善女人得聞般若波羅蜜經耳者,是人於前世佛作功德,與善知識相隨」——般若的聲音從耳邊過一遍,就已經不是小事;何況受持、親近、讀、誦、正憶念、如說行。舍利弗接著把格立起來:聞是深般若,不驚、不怖、不畏,「當知是善男子、善女人如阿鞞跋致菩薩摩訶薩」。反過來也一樣:今世呰毀深般若的,「當知是人前世亦呰毀深般若波羅蜜」——論主說得直白:「如厚福德者,從久積集;不信毀呰者,亦從久習。」信與不信,都不是這一世臨時起的念,是久行久習的果實。所以帝釋唱出全品第一聲讚歎:「我禮般若波羅蜜!禮般若波羅蜜,是禮一切智。」佛印可,並交了底:「諸佛一切智皆從般若波羅蜜生,一切智即是般若波羅蜜。」論主給信力配了一個喻:「譬如新劈乾毳,隨風東西;濕毳緤緻,則不可動」——新發意的人福薄隨他人語,如乾毛隨風;久修福德的人,吹不動。
那麼信了之後怎麼行?帝釋問:云何住般若、云何習行般若?佛的答法全是遮詞:「若不住色中,為習行般若波羅蜜」;六度也一樣,「不住般若波羅蜜,為習般若波羅蜜」;再翻進一層——「不習色,若不習色,是名習色」。憑什麼?「色前際不可得、中際不可得、後際不可得」住即是取相,取相即失般若。舍利弗三歎「甚深」「難可測量」「無量」,佛三答皆繫諸法:「色如甚深故,般若波羅蜜甚深」;而行法仍是不行——不行色甚深,為行般若波羅蜜。論主在這裡說破深淺的祕密:「譬如水深淺無定,若於小兒則深,長者則淺」;乃至大海,於人則深,於羅睺阿修羅王則淺——「諸佛如羅睺阿修羅王,於一切法無有深者,得無礙解脫故。」深不是般若的自性,是眾生信力的倒影。
於是有了那一組著名的問答:這麼深的法,該不該在新發意菩薩前說?舍利弗說不應——怕他驚怖疑悔、毀呰而種三惡道業。帝釋追問:那有沒有未受記而聞深般若不驚不怖的?舍利弗答:有,這樣的人「受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久,不過一佛、兩佛」。能信本身就是受記的先相。舍利弗一連說了四個譬喻:人過四百由旬險道,先見放牧者、壃界、園林,便知城邑聚落不遠;欲見大海的人,見平地無樹相無山相,便知海不遠;初春陳葉已墮,便知新葉華果出在不久;母人懷妊身重厭習,便知產生不久。論主把險道喻逐項配法——「賊」是六十二邪見,「惡蟲」是愛恚諸煩惱,「聚落」是柔順法忍,「邑」是無生法忍,「城」是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提;又添一喻:「如吞鉤之魚,雖復遊戲池中,當知出在不久」——深信樂般若的人,不久住於生死。
之上末後轉入付囑。須菩提讚佛「善付諸菩薩摩訶薩事」,佛歷數菩薩以四攝——布施、愛語、利益、同事——成就眾生,自行亦教他行,教眾生得四果辟支佛道而「自於內不證」。之下開卷即轉問具足修行般若。何謂具足般若?「不見色增相,亦不見色減相」;何以故?「諸法無相故,諸法空、欺誑、不堅固,無覺者、無壽者故。」這樣的法誰能信解?佛答:「久行六波羅蜜、種善根、多親近供養諸佛、與善知識相隨」的人;而久不以年歲算——「不分別色,不分別色相,不分別色性」,能如是行,是名久。須菩提兩讚般若是珍寶聚、是清淨聚,隨即發現了珍寶的代價:「是甚深般若波羅蜜,多有留難。」世間以珍寶故多有賊出,般若是大珍寶,故魔事叢生——所以佛教人疾書、疾讀、疾修,一月能成就的不要拖到一歲。但留難終不能壞:「是佛力故,惡魔不能留難」;「般若波羅蜜是十方諸佛母,人欲沮壞,不得不護。」般若生諸佛,諸佛還護般若;十方諸佛皆識、皆以佛眼見是書持讀誦的人——一個人在燈下寫經,十方佛眼在焉。
品末是一幅法運的地圖。佛出東方,於中說般若;般涅槃後,是深般若波羅蜜當至南方,從南方轉至西方,從西方轉至北方——「是時北方當作佛事」。何以故?「我法盛時,無有滅相。」佛不在世而般若行世,佛事不必假佛身;北方雪山冷,藥草能殺諸毒,眾生柔軟,信等五根皆得勢力,故般若於彼廣行,「如然一燈,展轉皆然」。這正是全品的落點:法的不滅,繫在信行人的手上——書寫、受持、讀、誦、正憶念、如說修行,就是末法時代的佛事。所以品末留下一句誡:「若悋惜法,則常生邊地無佛法處。」聞持是福,傳持是行;歎信行,歎的是這雙拿得住般若、也遞得出般若的手。
This chapter begins with a thought in the mind of the lord of the gods. Śakra thinks: ‘If good men and good women have the prajñāpāramitā sūtra reach their ears, these people made merit under the buddhas of former lives and kept company with good friends’—for the sound of prajñā to pass once by the ear is already no small thing; how much more to receive and uphold it, draw near to it, read, recite, rightly recollect it, and practise as it is taught. Śāriputra then sets up the standard: one who hears this deep prajñā and is not startled, not terrified, not afraid—‘know that this good man or good woman is like an avaivartika bodhisattva-mahāsattva’. The converse holds just the same: one who in this life disparages the deep prajñā—‘know that this person in a former life also disparaged the deep prajñāpāramitā’—and the treatise-author says it plainly: ‘As one of thick merit comes from long accumulation, so one who disbelieves and disparages also comes from long habit.’ Faith and unbelief are neither of them a thought raised on the spur of this one life; they are the fruit of long practice and long habit. Therefore Śakra sings out the first praise of the chapter: ‘I worship prajñāpāramitā! To worship prajñāpāramitā is to worship omniscience.’ The Buddha confirms it and shows the ground: ‘The omniscience of the buddhas is all born from prajñāpāramitā, and omniscience is prajñāpāramitā.’ The treatise-author fits the power of faith with a simile: ‘It is like freshly split dry wool, which goes east and west with the wind; wet wool, densely felted, cannot be moved’—one who has newly aroused the mind, thin in merit, follows what others say, like dry wool with the wind; one who has long cultivated merit cannot be blown.
Then, having faith, how does one practise? Śakra asks: how does one abide in prajñā, how does one train in prajñā? The Buddha's way of answering is all negation: ‘If one does not abide in form, that is training in prajñāpāramitā’; with the six perfections likewise, ‘not abiding in prajñāpāramitā is training in prajñāpāramitā’; and it turns one level further—‘not training in form; if one does not train in form, this is called training in form’. On what ground? ‘Because the prior limit of form is unfindable, its middle limit is unfindable, its later limit is unfindable’; to abide is to grasp at marks, and to grasp at marks is to lose prajñā. Śāriputra three times praises it—‘very deep’, ‘hard to fathom’, ‘immeasurable’—and the Buddha three times answers by tying it to all dharmas: ‘because the suchness of form is very deep, prajñāpāramitā is very deep’; and the dharma of practice is still non-practice—not practising the depth of form is practising prajñāpāramitā. Here the treatise-author lays bare the secret of deep and shallow: ‘It is like water, whose depth and shallowness are not fixed: to a small child it is deep, to a grown man it is shallow’; even the great sea is deep to a human and shallow to the asura king Rāhu—‘the buddhas are like the asura king Rāhu: among all dharmas there is none that is deep to them, because they have attained unobstructed liberation.’ Depth is not the self-nature of prajñā; it is the reflection of the power of beings' faith.
From this comes the famous set of questions and answers: should so deep a dharma be spoken before a bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind? Śāriputra says it should not—for fear that he will be startled and terrified, doubt and regret, disparage it, and plant the karma of the three evil destinies. Śakra presses: then is there anyone who, without having received the prediction, hears the deep prajñā and is neither startled nor terrified? Śāriputra answers: there is; such a person ‘will receive the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi before long, within no more than one buddha or two buddhas’. Being able to have faith is itself the prior sign of receiving the prediction. Śāriputra gives four similes in a row: a person crossing a dangerous road of four hundred yojanas first sees herdsmen, boundary marks, and gardens, and knows that the town and village are not far; one who wishes to see the great sea, seeing level ground without the mark of trees or the mark of mountains, knows that the sea is not far; in early spring, when the old leaves have already fallen, one knows that new leaves, flowers, and fruit will come forth before long; a woman with child, her body heavy and weary of her habits, knows that the birth is not far. The treatise-author matches the simile of the dangerous road item by item to the Dharma—the ‘bandits’ are the sixty-two wrong views, the ‘evil insects’ are the afflictions of craving and hatred, the ‘village’ is the compliant acceptance of dharmas, the ‘town’ is the acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas, the ‘city’ is anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi; and adds one more simile: ‘like a fish that has swallowed the hook: though it still plays in the pond, know that it will be out before long’—one who deeply believes in and delights in prajñā will not long abide in birth and death.
At the end of the First Part the chapter turns to the entrusting. Subhūti praises the Buddha for ‘entrusting well the affairs of the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas’, and the Buddha enumerates how the bodhisattva, by the four means of gathering—giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour—brings beings to accomplishment, practising himself and teaching others to practise, teaching beings to attain the four fruits and the path of the pratyekabuddha while ‘he himself does not realise them within’. The Last Part opens by turning to the question of fully practising prajñā. What is full prajñā? ‘He sees no mark of increase in form, nor any mark of decrease in form’; why? ‘Because dharmas are signless; because dharmas are empty, deceptive, not firm, without a perceiver, without a life.’ Who can have faith in and understand such a dharma? The Buddha answers: one who ‘has long practised the six perfections, planted roots of goodness, drawn near to and made offerings to many buddhas, and kept company with good friends’; and ‘long’ is not reckoned by years—‘not discriminating form, not discriminating the mark of form, not discriminating the nature of form’: one who can practise thus is called long-practised. Subhūti twice praises prajñā as the heap of precious treasure and the heap of purity, and straight away discovers the price of treasure: ‘This very deep prajñāpāramitā has many hindrances.’ In the world, because of precious things, many bandits appear; prajñā is the great precious treasure, and so the deeds of Māra swarm—which is why the Buddha teaches people to write it quickly, read it quickly, cultivate it quickly, and not to drag out to a year what can be accomplished in a month. But hindrance can never destroy it: ‘by the Buddha's power, the evil Māra cannot hinder’; ‘prajñāpāramitā is the mother of the buddhas of the ten directions; when someone wishes to ruin it, they cannot but protect it.’ Prajñā gives birth to the buddhas, and the buddhas in turn protect prajñā; the buddhas of the ten directions all know, and all see with the Buddha-eye, the person who writes, upholds, reads, and recites it—a person writing out the sūtra under a lamp, and the Buddha-eyes of the ten directions are upon him.
The end of the chapter is a map of the fortunes of the Dharma. The Buddha appears in the east and there expounds prajñā; after his parinirvāṇa, this deep prajñāpāramitā will go to the south, from the south pass to the west, from the west pass to the north—‘at that time the north will do the work of the Buddha’. Why? ‘When my Dharma flourishes, it has no mark of extinction.’ The Buddha is not in the world and yet prajñā moves through the world; the work of the Buddha need not borrow the Buddha's body; in the north the snowy mountains are cold, the medicinal herbs can kill all poisons, beings are pliant, and the five faculties beginning with faith all gain strength, and so prajñā will spread widely there, ‘as when one lamp is lit, one from another they are all lit’. This is exactly where the whole chapter comes to rest: the non-extinction of the Dharma is tied to the hands of those who practise in faith—to write, to receive and uphold, to read, to recite, to rightly recollect, to cultivate as it is taught: this is the work of the Buddha in the age of the Dharma's end. So the chapter leaves an admonition at its close: ‘If one begrudges the Dharma, one is ever born in a border land where there is no Buddha-dharma.’ To hear and hold is merit; to pass on and hold is practice; the praise of practising in faith is praise of that pair of hands which can hold prajñā fast and can also hand it on.
卷66 〔T25 0522a09〕
大智度論釋歎信行品第四十五 聖者龍樹造 後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯 【經】 爾時釋提桓因作是念:「若善男子、善女人得聞般若波羅蜜經耳者,是人於前世佛作功德,與善知識相隨,何況受持、親近、讀、誦、正憶念、如說行!當知是善男子、善女人多親近諸佛,能得聽、受、如說行、能問、能答;當知是善男子、善女人於前世多供養、親近諸佛故,聞是深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖、不畏;當知是人亦於無量億劫行檀波羅蜜、尸羅波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜、般若波羅蜜。」 爾時,舍利弗白佛言:「世尊!若有善男子、善女人聞是深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖、不畏,聞已受持、親近、如說習行,當知是善男子、善女人如阿鞞跋致菩薩摩訶薩。何以故?世尊!是般若波羅蜜甚深!若先世不久行檀波羅蜜、尸羅波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜、般若波羅蜜,終不能信解深〔T25 0522b〕般若波羅蜜。世尊!若有善男子、善女人呰毀深般若波羅蜜者,當知是人前世亦呰毀深般若波羅蜜。何以故?是善男子、善女人聞說深般若波羅蜜時,無信無樂,心不清淨,當知是善男子、善女人先世不問不難諸佛及弟子:『云何應行檀波羅蜜、尸羅波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜、般若波羅蜜?云何應修內空乃至云何應修無法有法空?云何應修四念處乃至云何應修八聖道分?云何應修佛十力乃至云何應修十八不共法?』」 釋提桓因語舍利弗:「是深般若波羅蜜,若有善男子、善女人不久行檀波羅蜜、尸羅波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜、般若波羅蜜,不行內空乃至無法有法空,不行四禪、四無量心、四無色定,不行四念處乃至八聖道分,不行佛十力乃至十八不共法——如是人不信解是深般若波羅蜜,有何可怪!大德舍利弗!我禮般若波羅蜜!禮般若波羅蜜,是禮一切智。」 佛告釋提桓因:「如是!如是!憍尸迦!禮般若波羅蜜,是禮一切智。何以故?憍尸迦!諸佛一切智皆從般若波羅蜜生,一切智即是般若波羅蜜。以是故,憍尸迦!善男子、善女人欲住一切智,當住般若波羅蜜。若善男子、善女人欲生道種智,當習行般若波羅蜜;欲斷一切諸結及習,當習行般若波羅蜜。善男子、善女人欲轉法輪,當習行般若波羅蜜。善男子、善女人欲得須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果,當習行般若波羅蜜;欲得辟支佛道,當習行般若〔T25 0522c〕波羅蜜;欲教眾生令得須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果、辟支佛道,當習行般若波羅蜜。若善男子、善女人欲教眾生令得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,若欲總攝比丘僧,當習行般若波羅蜜。」 【論】 釋曰: 釋提桓因是諸天主,利根、智勝、信佛法故,倍復增益;如火得風,愈更熾盛。聞須菩提以種種因緣讚般若波羅蜜,佛以深理成其所讚。帝釋發希有心,作是念:若善男子、善女人得聞般若經耳者,是人於前世多供養諸佛、作大功德,今世得遇好師、同學等善知識。因先世供養佛、緣今世善知識故,聞般若波羅蜜能信;何況讀、誦、思惟、正憶念、修習禪定、籌量分別義趣、能成辦事者!當知是人從過去諸佛及弟子聞深般若波羅蜜義,信受,不怖、不畏。何以故?是人於無量阿僧祇劫行六波羅蜜等諸功德,是故雖未得阿鞞跋致地,於深法中不疑、不悔。譬如新劈乾毳,隨風東西;濕毳緤緻,則不可動。新發意菩薩亦如是,不久修德、作福淺薄、隨他人語,不能信受般若波羅蜜;若久修福德、不隨他語,則能信受深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖。 帝釋思惟念般若波羅蜜有無量功德時,舍利弗知帝釋所念,而白佛言:「世尊!善男子、善女人雖未入菩薩位,能信受深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖,如說修行,是人大福德、智慧、信力故,當知如阿鞞跋致無異。」 此中佛自說因緣:般若波羅蜜甚深!無相可取、〔T25 0523a〕可信、可受;若能信受,是為希有!如人空中種殖,是為甚難!一切凡夫得勝法,則捨本事;如得禪定樂,捨五欲樂,乃至依有頂處,捨無所有處功德;不能無所依止而有所捨。如尺蠖尋條,安前足,進後足,盡樹端,更無所依止,還歸本處。是菩薩未得道,於般若波羅蜜無所依止,而能修福德、捨五欲,是事希有!是中說因緣:「是人先世信受,久行六波羅蜜,大集諸福德。」 與信相違,則毀呰般若波羅蜜。如厚福德者,從久積集;不信毀呰者,亦從久習。 問曰: 若先世毀呰誹謗,應墮地獄,何緣復得聞般若? 答曰: 有人言:是人墮地獄罪畢,還來毀呰,不說次後身。 有人言:作業積集厚重,則能與果報;是人前世雖不信,而積業未厚,則未得果報;以餘福德故生人中,續復不信。 復次,有人言:五逆罪,次後身必受;餘罪不爾,或次後身、或久後身。 爾時,帝釋語舍利弗:「是般若波羅蜜,畢竟空、無所有故甚深。菩薩不久行功德,則著心堅固、信力微弱,不信般若波羅蜜乃至一切智,何足怪?」 帝釋思惟籌量:「信般若波羅蜜福德無量,不信者得罪深重。」深愛敬般若波羅蜜故,發是言:「我當禮是般若!何以故?禮般若波羅蜜,則為禮一切智;禮一切智者,則禮三世十方諸佛。」 爾時,佛可其言,復說讚般若波羅蜜因緣,所謂諸佛一切智慧皆從般若中生,是故言:「若有菩薩欲住一切智中乃至總攝比丘僧,當習行般若波羅蜜。」 【經】 釋提桓因白佛言:「世尊!菩薩摩訶薩欲〔T25 0523b〕行般若波羅蜜時,云何名住般若波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、尸羅波羅蜜、檀波羅蜜?云何住內空乃至無法有法空?云何住四禪、四無量心、四無色定、五神通?云何住四念處乃至八聖道分?云何住佛十力乃至十八不共法?世尊!菩薩摩訶薩云何習行般若波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜、內空乃至十八不共法?」 佛語釋提桓因:「善哉!善哉!憍尸迦!汝能樂問是事,皆是佛神力!憍尸迦!若菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,若不住色中,為習行般若波羅蜜;若不住受、想、行、識中,為習行般若波羅蜜。眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意,色、聲、香、味、觸、法,眼界乃至意識界,亦如是。憍尸迦!若菩薩摩訶薩不住般若波羅蜜中,為習般若波羅蜜;不住禪波羅蜜中,為習禪波羅蜜;不住毘梨耶波羅蜜中,為習毘梨耶波羅蜜;不住羼提波羅蜜中,為習羼提波羅蜜;不住尸羅波羅蜜中,為習尸羅波羅蜜;不住檀波羅蜜中,為習檀波羅蜜。如是,憍尸迦!是名菩薩摩訶薩不住般若波羅蜜,為習般若波羅蜜。憍尸迦!不住內空中,為習內空;乃至不住無法有法空,為習無法有法空。不住四禪,為習四禪;不住四無量心,為習四無量心;不住四無色定,為習四無色定;不住五神通,為習五神通。不住四念處,為習四念處;乃至不住八聖道分,為習行八聖道分。不住佛十力,為習行佛十力;乃至不住十八不共法,為習行十八不共法。何以故?憍尸迦!是菩薩不得色可住可習處;乃至十八不共法不得十八不共法可住可習處。復次,憍尸迦!菩薩〔T25 0523c〕摩訶薩不習色,若不習色,是名習色;受、想、行、識乃至十八不共法亦如是。何以故?是菩薩摩訶薩,色前際不可得、中際不可得、後際不可得;乃至十八不共法亦如是。」 舍利弗白佛言:「世尊!是般若波羅蜜甚深!」 佛言:「色如甚深故,般若波羅蜜甚深;受、想、行、識如甚深故,般若波羅蜜甚深;乃至十八不共法亦如是。」 舍利弗言:「世尊!是般若波羅蜜難可測量!」 佛言:「色難可測量故,般若波羅蜜難可測量;受、想、行、識乃至十八不共法難可測量故,般若波羅蜜難可測量。」 「世尊!是般若波羅蜜無量!」 佛言:「色無量故,般若波羅蜜無量;受、想、行、識乃至十八不共法無量故,般若波羅蜜無量。」 佛告舍利弗:「若菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,不行色甚深,為行般若波羅蜜;不行受、想、行、識乃至不行十八不共法甚深,為行般若波羅蜜。何以故?色甚深相為非色;受、想、行、識,乃至十八不共法甚深相為非十八不共法。如是不行,為行般若波羅蜜。舍利弗!若菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,不行色難測量,為行般若波羅蜜;不行受、想、行、識,乃至不行十八不共法難測量,為行般若波羅蜜。何以故?色難測量相為非色;受、想、行、識,乃至十八不共法難測量相為非十八不共法。舍利弗!若菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,不行色無量,為行般若波羅蜜;不行受、相、行、識,乃至不行十八不共法無量,為行般若波羅蜜。何以故?色是無量相為非色;受、想、行、識,乃至十八不共法無量相為非十八不共法。」 舍利弗〔T25 0524a〕白佛言:「世尊!是般若波羅蜜甚深,甚深相難見、難解、不可思量,不應在新發意菩薩前說。何以故?新發意菩薩聞是甚深般若波羅蜜,或當驚怖,心生疑悔,不信、不行。是甚深般若波羅蜜當在阿鞞跋致菩薩摩訶薩前說;是菩薩聞是甚深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖,心不疑悔,則能信行。」 釋提桓因問舍利弗:「若在新發意菩薩摩訶薩前說是深般若波羅蜜,有何等過?」 舍利弗報釋提桓因:「憍尸迦!若在新發意菩薩前說是深般若波羅蜜,或當驚怖,呰毀、不信,是新發意菩薩或有是處。若新發意菩薩聞是深般若波羅蜜,毀呰、不信,種三惡道業;是業因緣故,久久難得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」 【論】 釋曰: 爾時,帝釋從佛聞讚般若波羅蜜具足故,今問佛:「菩薩云何住般若波羅蜜,從禪波羅蜜,乃至十八不共法?」 佛讚言「善哉!善哉」者,以釋提桓因諸天中主,言必可信。問是事,斷大眾疑,通達無礙,能大利益,故言:「善哉!善哉!」復次,佛以帝釋能捨上妙五欲、七寶、宮殿,能問佛賢聖所行事,是故言「善哉」 「以佛神力故,汝能樂問此事」,是中更有上妙諸天觀佛神德無量;今帝釋能於大眾中諮問佛事,故是佛威神。如《持心經》說:「佛光明入身中,能問佛事。」 「佛答憍尸迦:若菩薩不住色等,是習行般若波羅蜜」者,是菩薩見色無常、苦等過罪,故不住色;若不住色,即是能習行般若波羅蜜。凡夫人見色著色故,起顛倒煩惱,失是般若波羅蜜〔T25 0524b〕道。以是故,不住者,能習行般若波羅蜜。五眾、十二入、十八界亦如是。 問曰: 何以故不住六波羅蜜等各各自習其行? 答曰: 是六波羅蜜等皆是善法行法,以是故說:不住六度等,言各習其行;眾、界、入,為習行般若波羅蜜。若於是法中不著,則斷愛著;斷愛著故,色等諸法中清淨習。 此中說不住因緣,所謂不得色等法住處,不得色等法習處。 復次,佛以此事難解,故更說因緣:「不習色」者,是菩薩見色過,故不住色中;不住故不習。「習色」名取色相,若常、若無常等。復次,菩薩常行善法,正語、正業等,積習純厚,故名「習色」。 今菩薩欲行般若故,散壞是色,不習。所以者何?過去色已滅、未來色未有故不可習;現在色生時即滅故不住,若住一念尚無習,何況念念滅?是故此中說不習色因緣:「三世色不可得。」乃至十八不共法亦如是。若能如是觀諸法散壞,不取相,是名「能習色等諸法實相」。 爾時,舍利弗從佛聞是義,歡喜,深入空智,白佛:「般若波羅蜜甚深!」 佛然可,成其所讚:「色等諸法如故甚深。」佛語:「不但眼見色甚深,以般若波羅蜜分別色入如實故甚深。」如雨渧渧,不名甚深;和合眾流,入於大海,乃名甚深。色等亦如是。 天眼、肉眼,見淺而不深;若以慧眼觀,則深不可測。甚深故難可測量,唯有諸佛乃盡其底。 甚深不可測量,故名「無量」。無有智慧能取色等實相,若常、若無常,籌量有過罪故。 是時,舍利弗及諸聽者作是念:〔T25 0524c〕「般若波羅蜜不可測量、無有量,菩薩當云何行?」 佛知其念,告舍利弗:「菩薩摩訶薩若行色等甚深者,則為失般若波羅蜜;若不行色甚深,是為得般若波羅蜜。」 凡夫鈍根,故言甚深;若有一心、福德、利根者,為非甚深。譬如水深淺無定,若於小兒則深,長者則淺;乃至大海,於人則深,於羅睺阿修羅王則淺。如是,於凡夫人、新發意、懈怠者為甚深,於久積德阿鞞跋致則淺。諸佛如羅睺阿修羅王,於一切法無有深者,得無礙解脫故。以是故知:為眾生及時節、利鈍、初久、懈怠精進故,分別說深淺。不可測量、無有量,亦如是。 此中佛自說因緣:「色等法甚深相為非色。何以故?怖畏、心沒、疑悔故,以色為甚深,色相則無深。」如先說。 舍利弗白佛言:「世尊!是般若波羅蜜甚深,甚深相難見、難解。」 問曰: 上說「菩薩不行甚深,為行般若波羅蜜」,今舍利弗何以復說「甚深」? 答曰: 舍利弗非定心說甚深,得佛意趣,為人故說甚深。是故此中說:「世尊!不應於新發意菩薩前說是般若波羅蜜,新學菩薩聞是深智慧則心沒。應當在阿鞞跋致菩薩前說,阿鞞跋致智慧深故,信而不沒。」譬如深水,不應使小兒渡,應教大人令渡。 帝釋問舍利弗:「若為新發意菩薩說,有何等過?」 舍利弗答:「是新發意者則不信、心沒,心沒故生疑悔、怖畏——若受一切空法,我云何當墮斷滅中?若不受者,佛所說法,何可不受!是故怖畏、生疑悔。」若心定,則生惡邪毀呰;毀呰〔T25 0525a〕果報,如〈地獄品〉中說。此中略說:「種三惡道業因緣,久久難得無上道。」 【經】 釋提桓因問舍利弗:「頗有未受記菩薩摩訶薩聞是深般若波羅蜜不驚、不怖者不?」 舍利弗言:「如是!憍尸迦!若有菩薩摩訶薩聞是深般若波羅蜜不驚、不怖,當知是菩薩,受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久,不過一佛、兩佛。」 佛告舍利弗:「如是!如是!是菩薩摩訶薩久發意、行六波羅蜜、多供養諸佛,聞是深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖、不畏,聞即受持,如般若波羅蜜中所說行。」 爾時,舍利弗白佛言:「世尊!我欲說譬喻。如求菩薩道善男子、善女人夢中修行般若波羅蜜、入禪定、勤精進、具足忍辱、守護於戒、行布施,修行內空、外空,乃至坐於道場,當知是善男子、善女人近阿耨多羅三藐三菩提;何況菩薩摩訶薩欲得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,覺時修行般若波羅蜜、入禪定、勤精進、具足忍辱、守護於戒、行布施,而不疾成阿耨多羅三藐三菩提、坐於道場!世尊!善男子、善女人善根成就,得聞般若波羅蜜,受持乃至如說行;當知是菩薩摩訶薩久發意、種善根、多供養諸佛、與善知識相隨;是人能受持般若波羅蜜乃至正憶念,當知是人近受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記。當知是善男子、善女人如阿鞞跋致菩薩摩訶薩,於阿耨多羅三藐三菩提不動轉,能得深般若波羅蜜;得已,能受持、讀、誦,乃至正憶念。 「世尊!譬如人欲過百由旬、若二百、三百、四百由旬曠野嶮道,先見諸相:若放牧者、若壃界、〔T25 0525b〕若園林,如是等諸相,故知近城、邑、聚落。是人見是相已,作如是念:『如我所見相,當知城、邑、聚落不遠。』心得安隱,不畏賊難、惡蟲、飢渴。 「世尊!菩薩摩訶薩亦如是,若得是深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念,當知近受得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久,當知是菩薩摩訶薩不應畏墮聲聞、辟支佛地。是諸先相,所謂甚深般若波羅蜜,得聞、得見、得受乃至正憶念故。」 佛告舍利弗:「如是!如是!汝復樂說者,便說。」 「世尊!譬如人欲見大海,發心往趣,不見樹相、不見山相,是人雖未見大海,知大海不遠。何以故?大海處平,無樹相、無山相故。如是,世尊!菩薩摩訶薩聞是深般若波羅蜜、受持乃至正憶念時,雖未佛前受劫數之記,若劫百、千劫、萬劫、百千萬億劫,是菩薩自知近受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久。何以故?我得聞是深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念故。 「世尊!譬如初春,諸樹陳葉已墮,當知此樹新葉華果出在不久。何以故?見是諸樹先相故,知今不久葉華果出;是時閻浮提人,見樹先相,皆大歡喜。世尊!菩薩摩訶薩得聞是深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念、如說行,當知是菩薩善根成就、多供養諸佛。是菩薩應作是念:『先世善根所追,趣阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以是因緣故,得見、得聞是深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念、如說行。』是中諸天子曾見佛者,歡喜踊躍,作是念言:『先諸菩薩摩訶薩亦有如是受記先相,今是菩薩摩訶薩受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記〔T25 0525c〕亦不久。』 「世尊!譬如母人懷妊,身體苦重,行步不便,坐起不安,眠食轉少,不喜言語,厭本所習,受苦痛故;有異母人見其先相,當知產生不久。菩薩摩訶薩亦如是,種善根、多供養諸佛、久行六波羅蜜、與善知識相隨,善根成就,得聞深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念、如說行;諸菩薩亦知是菩薩摩訶薩得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久。」 佛告舍利弗:「善哉!善哉!汝所樂說,皆是佛力。」 爾時,須菩提白佛言:「希有!世尊!諸多陀阿伽度、阿羅呵、三藐三佛陀善付諸菩薩摩訶薩事!」 佛告須菩提:「是諸菩薩摩訶薩發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,安隱多眾生,令無量眾生得樂,憐愍、安樂、饒益諸天人故。是諸菩薩行菩薩道時,以四事攝無量百千眾生,所謂布施、愛語、利益、同事;亦以十善道成就眾生。自行初禪,亦教他人令行初禪;乃至自行非有想非無想處,亦教他人令行乃至非有想非無想處。自行檀波羅蜜,亦教他人令行檀波羅蜜;自行尸羅波羅蜜,亦教他人令行尸羅波羅蜜;自行羼提波羅蜜,亦教他人令行羼提波羅蜜;自行毘梨耶波羅蜜,亦教他人令行毘梨耶波羅蜜;自行禪波羅蜜,亦教他人令行禪波羅蜜;自行般若波羅蜜,亦教他人令行般若波羅蜜。是菩薩得般若波羅蜜,以方便力教眾生令得須陀洹果,自於內不證;教眾生令得斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果,自於內不證;教眾生令得辟支佛道,自於內不證。自行六波羅蜜,亦教無量百千萬諸菩〔T25 0526a〕薩令行六波羅蜜。自住阿鞞跋致地,亦教他人住阿鞞跋致地。自淨佛世界,亦教他人淨佛世界。自成就眾生,亦教他人成就眾生。自得菩薩神通,亦教他人令得菩薩神通。自淨陀羅尼門,亦教他人淨陀羅尼門。自具足樂說辯才,亦教他人具足樂說辯才。自受色成就,亦教他人令受色成就。自成就三十二相,亦教他人成就三十二相。自成就童真地,亦教他人成就童真地。自成就佛十力,亦教他人令成就佛十力。自行四無所畏,亦教他人行四無所畏。自行十八不共法,亦教他人行十八不共法。自行大慈、大悲,亦教他人令行大慈大悲。自得一切種智,亦教他人令得一切種智。自離一切結使及習,亦教他人令離一切結使及習。自轉法輪,亦教他人轉法輪。」 【論】 釋曰: 爾時,帝釋問舍利弗:「頗有未受記菩薩聞是深般若不驚、不怖者不?」 舍利弗言:「無有不受記聞般若能信者。若或時能信者,當知垂欲受記,不過見一佛、二佛,便得受記。」 佛可舍利弗語。 舍利弗聞佛可其所說,心生歡喜;復欲分明了了是事故說譬喻,作是言:「夢中心為睡所覆故,非真心所作;若善男子、善女人於夢中發意行六波羅蜜乃至坐於道場,當知是人福德輕微,近於受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記。何況菩薩摩訶薩覺時實心發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提、行六波羅蜜而不近受記!世尊!若人往來六道生死中,或時得聞般若波羅〔T25 0526b〕蜜,受持、讀、誦、正憶念,必知是人不久得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」 如吞鉤之魚,雖復遊戲池中,當知出在不久;行者亦如是,深信樂般若波羅蜜,不久住於生死。 此中舍利弗自說譬喻—— 「若人欲過險道」:「險道」者即是世間。「百由旬」者是欲界,「二百由旬」者是色界,「三百由旬」者是無色界,「四百由旬」者是聲聞、辟支佛道。 復次,「四百由旬」是欲界,「三百由旬」是色界,「二百由旬」是無色界,「百由旬」是聲聞、辟支佛。 「欲出」者,是信受行般若波羅蜜人。「先見諸法相」者,見大菩薩捨世間欲樂,深心樂般若波羅蜜。「壃界」者,分別諸法——是聲聞法、是辟支佛法、是大乘法;如是小利是聲聞,大利是菩薩;魔界是生死,佛界是般若波羅蜜、甘露法味不死之處。「園林」者,隨佛道禪定、智慧等樂。如是等無量善法相。「聚落」者,是柔順法忍,「邑」是無生法忍,「城」是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。「得安穩」者,菩薩聞是法,思惟籌量行:「我得是法心安穩,當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」「賊」者,是我等六十二邪見。「惡蟲」者,是愛、恚等諸煩惱。「不畏賊」者,人不得便。「不畏惡蟲」者,非人不得便。「不畏飢」者,不畏不能得聖人真智慧。「不畏渴」者,不畏不能得禪定、解脫等法樂味。 此中自說因緣:「菩薩摩訶薩得先相者,不久當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」 「不畏墮惡道中、飢餓死」者,不畏墮聲聞、辟支佛地。 佛然可其喻,以麁喻細,以世間喻出世間。 餘三譬喻,亦應如上分別說。 「大海水」是無上〔T25 0526c〕道;「平地無樹無山」,是般若波羅蜜經卷等。 「樹果」是無上道,「樹華」是阿鞞跋致地;「春時陳葉落,更生新葉」,是諸煩惱邪見、疑等滅,能得般若波羅蜜經卷等。 「母人」是行者,「所任身」是無上道,「欲產相」是菩薩久習行般若波羅蜜;「厭本所習」是患世間婬欲樂,不復喜著。 佛讚其所說善哉! 爾時,須菩提聞佛然舍利弗所說,讚其善哉,知佛意深敬念是菩薩,是故白佛言:「世尊!甚為希有!善付菩薩事。」「菩薩事」者,空道,福德道;亦如佛種種總相、別相說,以寄付阿難、彌勒等,入無餘涅槃後,好自奉行教示,利益眾生,無令謬錯! 佛說善付因緣:諸菩薩發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。 「安穩多眾生」者,一切眾生中,無量無邊阿僧祇,除佛無能計知者;從佛得利益者不可數故名「多」。「安穩」者,眾生著常,教無常;著樂者,教苦;著實者,教空;著我者,教無我——如是等名安穩。凡夫人聞是,當時雖不喜樂,久久滅諸煩惱,得安穩樂;如服苦藥,當時雖苦,後得除患。「無量眾生得樂」者,菩薩求般若波羅蜜未得成就時,以今世、後世樂利益眾生,如《菩薩本生經》說。若得般若波羅蜜,已斷諸煩惱亦以世間樂、出世間樂利益眾生;若得無上道時,但以出世間樂利益眾生。「安樂、饒益」者,但以憐愍心故安樂、饒益。饒者,多利益天、人;餘道中饒益少故不說。 「利益事」者,所謂四攝法。以財施、法施二種攝取眾生。「愛語」有二種:一者、隨意愛語,二者、隨其所愛〔T25 0527a〕法為說。是菩薩未得道,憐愍眾生,自破憍慢,隨意說法。若得道,隨所應度法為說:高心富人,為讚布施,是人能得他物利名聲福德故;若為讚持戒、毀呰破戒,則心不喜樂——如是等,隨其所應而為說法。「利益」亦有二種:一者、今世利、後世利,為說法,以法治生,勤修利事;二者、未信教令信,破戒令持戒,寡識令多聞,不施者令布施,癡者教智慧——如是等,以善法利益眾生。「同事」者,菩薩教化眾生,令行善法,同其所行;菩薩善心,眾生惡心,能化其惡,令同己善。 是菩薩以四種攝眾生令住十善道,是廣說四攝義。於二施中法施。隨其所樂而為說法,是愛語中第一;眾生愛惜壽命,令行十善道,則得久壽。利益,於一切寶物利中,法利最勝,是為利益。同事中,同行善法為勝;是菩薩自行十善,亦以教人。 有人言:後自行十善等,是第四同義,是故說:「自行十善,亦教人行。」 「自行初禪,亦教他行」,初禪等同離欲,同持戒,是故名相攝;相攝故,漸漸能以三乘法度。乃至非有想非無想處,亦如是。自行六波羅蜜,亦以教他。 因般若故令眾生得般若分,所謂得須陀洹等;方便力故自不證。是人福德、智慧力增益故,教無量阿僧祇菩薩令住六波羅蜜。自住阿鞞跋致地等,亦以教他;乃至自轉法輪,亦教他轉法輪。 是故我以慈悲心故善付是菩薩事,不以愛著故。 大智度論卷第六十六
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
本卷題為《大智度論》釋〈歎信行品〉第四十五(卷第六十六)。
經①:帝釋念聞般若者前世作功德;舍利弗說信毀二途皆從先世;帝釋禮般若;禮般若即是禮一切智
那時,釋提桓因起這樣的念頭:『若善男子、善女人得以般若波羅蜜經過耳根聽聞,這人是於前世在佛所作了功德、與善知識相隨的,何況受持、親近、讀、誦、正憶念、如所說而行!應當知道這善男子、善女人多多親近過諸佛,能夠聽聞、領受、如說而行、能問、能答;應當知道這善男子、善女人因為前世多多供養、親近諸佛的緣故,聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖、不畏;應當知道這人也於無量億劫修行檀波羅蜜(布施度)、尸羅波羅蜜(持戒度)、羼提波羅蜜(忍辱度)、毘梨耶波羅蜜(精進度)、禪波羅蜜、般若波羅蜜。』
那時,舍利弗向佛稟白:『世尊!若有善男子、善女人聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖、不畏,聽聞之後受持、親近、如所說而修習行持,應當知道這善男子、善女人如同阿鞞跋致(不退轉)菩薩摩訶薩。為什麼呢?世尊!這般若波羅蜜甚深!若先世不曾長久修行檀波羅蜜、尸羅波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜、般若波羅蜜,終究不能信解甚深的般若波羅蜜。世尊!若有善男子、善女人譏毀甚深般若波羅蜜,應當知道這人前世也曾譏毀甚深般若波羅蜜。為什麼呢?這善男子、善女人聽人宣說甚深般若波羅蜜時,沒有信心、沒有愛樂,心不清淨,應當知道這善男子、善女人先世不曾請問、不曾究問諸佛及佛弟子——應當怎樣行檀波羅蜜、尸羅波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜、般若波羅蜜?應當怎樣修內空,乃至應當怎樣修無法有法空?應當怎樣修四念處,乃至應當怎樣修八聖道分?應當怎樣修佛十力,乃至應當怎樣修十八不共法?』
釋提桓因對舍利弗說:『這甚深般若波羅蜜,若有善男子、善女人不曾長久修行檀波羅蜜、尸羅波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜、般若波羅蜜,不曾修行內空乃至無法有法空,不曾修行四禪、四無量心、四無色定,不曾修行四念處乃至八聖道分,不曾修行佛十力乃至十八不共法——這樣的人不信解這甚深般若波羅蜜,有什麼可奇怪的!大德舍利弗!我禮敬般若波羅蜜!禮敬般若波羅蜜,就是禮敬一切智。』
佛告訴釋提桓因:『正是這樣!正是這樣!憍尸迦!禮敬般若波羅蜜,就是禮敬一切智。為什麼呢?憍尸迦!諸佛的一切智都是從般若波羅蜜生出來的,一切智就是般若波羅蜜。以這緣故,憍尸迦!善男子、善女人想要住於一切智,應當住於般若波羅蜜。若善男子、善女人想要生起道種智,應當修習行持般若波羅蜜;想要斷除一切諸結使以及習氣,應當修習行持般若波羅蜜。善男子、善女人想要轉法輪,應當修習行持般若波羅蜜。善男子、善女人想要證得須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果,應當修習行持般若波羅蜜;想要證得辟支佛道,應當修習行持般若波羅蜜;想要教導眾生使他們證得須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果、辟支佛道,應當修習行持般若波羅蜜。若善男子、善女人想要教導眾生使他們證得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提(無上正等正覺),若想要總攝比丘僧眾,應當修習行持般若波羅蜜。』
以下是論釋。
論①:釋帝釋發希有心;乾毳濕毳喻;空中種殖與尺蠖喻;毀呰之人何緣復得聞般若三說
論主解釋說:
釋提桓因是諸天之主,利根、智慧殊勝、深信佛法的緣故,加倍地增益;如火得到風,燒得愈加熾盛。他聽聞須菩提以種種因緣讚歎般若波羅蜜,佛又以深理成就他所讚歎的。帝釋發起希有之心,起這樣的念頭:若善男子、善女人得以般若之經經過耳根聽聞,這人是於前世多多供養諸佛、作大功德,今世得以遇到好的師長、同學等善知識。因為先世供養佛的因、藉今世善知識的緣,聽聞般若波羅蜜能夠生信;何況讀、誦、思惟、正憶念、修習禪定、籌量分別義趣、能成辦其事的人!應當知道這人是從過去諸佛及佛弟子那裡聽聞過甚深般若波羅蜜之義,信受,不怖、不畏。為什麼呢?這人於無量阿僧祇(無央數)劫修行六波羅蜜等種種功德,所以雖然還沒有得到阿鞞跋致地,於深法之中不疑、不悔。譬如新剖開的乾毛絮,隨風飄轉東西;濕的毛絮壓緊密緻,就吹不動了。新發意菩薩也是這樣,不曾長久修德、所作之福淺薄、隨順他人之語,就不能信受般若波羅蜜;若長久修集福德、不隨他人之語,就能信受甚深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖。
帝釋思惟憶念般若波羅蜜有無量功德時,舍利弗知道帝釋心中所念,於是向佛稟白:『世尊!善男子、善女人雖然還沒有進入菩薩位,能信受甚深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖,如所說而修行,這人因為大福德、智慧、信力的緣故,應當知道與阿鞞跋致沒有差別。』
這裡佛親自說出因緣:般若波羅蜜甚深!沒有相可以取、可以信、可以受;若能信受,這是希有的!如同人在虛空中種植,這是極難的!一切凡夫得到殊勝之法,就捨棄原來所依之事;如得到禪定之樂,就捨棄五欲之樂,乃至依於有頂處,就捨棄無所有處的功德;不能無所依止而有所捨。如同尺蠖沿著枝條爬行,安穩了前足,才推進後足,爬盡樹梢,再沒有可依止之處,便退回原處。這菩薩還沒有得道,於般若波羅蜜之上無所依止,卻能修集福德、捨棄五欲,這事是希有的!這裡說出因緣:『這人先世信受,長久修行六波羅蜜,廣大積集諸福德。』
與信相違背,就會譏毀般若波羅蜜。如同深厚福德的人,是從長久積集而來;不信而譏毀的人,也是從長久串習而來。
有人問:
若先世譏毀誹謗,應當墮於地獄,憑什麼緣由又能得聞般若?
回答:
有人說:這人墮地獄的罪報受完,回來又譏毀,這是不就次一生之身而說的。
有人說:造業積集深厚沉重,才能給予果報;這人前世雖然不信,然而積業還不深厚,就還沒有得到果報;以其餘福德的緣故生在人中,接續著又不信。
再者,有人說:五逆之罪,次一生之身必定受報;其餘的罪不是這樣,或次一生受、或久後之身才受。
那時,帝釋對舍利弗說:『這般若波羅蜜,畢竟空、無所有的緣故甚深。菩薩不曾長久修行功德,就執著之心堅固、信力微弱,不信般若波羅蜜乃至一切智,有什麼值得奇怪?』
帝釋思惟籌量:『信般若波羅蜜的福德無量,不信的人得罪深重。』因為深深愛敬般若波羅蜜的緣故,發出這樣的話:『我應當禮敬這般若!為什麼呢?禮敬般若波羅蜜,就是禮敬一切智;禮敬一切智,就是禮敬三世十方諸佛。』
那時,佛認可他的話,又宣說讚歎般若波羅蜜的因緣,就是諸佛的一切智慧都從般若之中生出,所以說:『若有菩薩想要住於一切智中,乃至總攝比丘僧眾,應當修習行持般若波羅蜜。』
經②:不住色中為習行般若;般若甚深難測無量;不行甚深為行般若;不應在新發意菩薩前說
釋提桓因向佛稟白:『世尊!菩薩摩訶薩想要行般若波羅蜜時,怎樣才名為住於般若波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、尸羅波羅蜜、檀波羅蜜?怎樣住於內空乃至無法有法空?怎樣住於四禪、四無量心、四無色定、五神通?怎樣住於四念處乃至八聖道分?怎樣住於佛十力乃至十八不共法?世尊!菩薩摩訶薩要怎樣修習行持般若波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜、內空乃至十八不共法?』
佛對釋提桓因說:『善哉!善哉!憍尸迦!你能樂於問這件事,都是佛的神力!憍尸迦!若菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,若不住於色中,就是修習行持般若波羅蜜;若不住於受、想、行、識中,就是修習行持般若波羅蜜。眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意,色、聲、香、味、觸、法,眼界乃至意識界,也是這樣。憍尸迦!若菩薩摩訶薩不住於般若波羅蜜中,就是修習般若波羅蜜;不住於禪波羅蜜中,就是修習禪波羅蜜;不住於毘梨耶波羅蜜中,就是修習毘梨耶波羅蜜;不住於羼提波羅蜜中,就是修習羼提波羅蜜;不住於尸羅波羅蜜中,就是修習尸羅波羅蜜;不住於檀波羅蜜中,就是修習檀波羅蜜。像這樣,憍尸迦!這就名為菩薩摩訶薩不住於般若波羅蜜,而修習般若波羅蜜。憍尸迦!不住於內空中,就是修習內空;乃至不住於無法有法空,就是修習無法有法空。不住於四禪,就是修習四禪;不住於四無量心,就是修習四無量心;不住於四無色定,就是修習四無色定;不住於五神通,就是修習五神通。不住於四念處,就是修習四念處;乃至不住於八聖道分,就是修習行持八聖道分。不住於佛十力,就是修習行持佛十力;乃至不住於十八不共法,就是修習行持十八不共法。為什麼呢?憍尸迦!這菩薩求不到色有可住、可習之處;乃至於十八不共法,也求不到十八不共法有可住、可習之處。再者,憍尸迦!菩薩摩訶薩不修習色,若不修習色,這才名為修習色;受、想、行、識乃至十八不共法也是這樣。為什麼呢?這菩薩摩訶薩觀色,前際不可得、中際不可得、後際不可得;乃至十八不共法也是這樣。』
舍利弗向佛稟白:『世尊!這般若波羅蜜甚深!』
佛說:『色之如甚深的緣故,般若波羅蜜甚深;受、想、行、識之如甚深的緣故,般若波羅蜜甚深;乃至十八不共法也是這樣。』
舍利弗說:『世尊!這般若波羅蜜難可測量!』
佛說:『色難可測量的緣故,般若波羅蜜難可測量;受、想、行、識乃至十八不共法難可測量的緣故,般若波羅蜜難可測量。』
『世尊!這般若波羅蜜無量!』
佛說:『色無量的緣故,般若波羅蜜無量;受、想、行、識乃至十八不共法無量的緣故,般若波羅蜜無量。』
佛告訴舍利弗:『若菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,不行色甚深,就是行般若波羅蜜;不行受、想、行、識乃至不行十八不共法甚深,就是行般若波羅蜜。為什麼呢?色的甚深之相就不是色;受、想、行、識,乃至十八不共法的甚深之相就不是十八不共法。像這樣不行,就是行般若波羅蜜。舍利弗!若菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,不行色難測量,就是行般若波羅蜜;不行受、想、行、識,乃至不行十八不共法難測量,就是行般若波羅蜜。為什麼呢?色的難測量之相就不是色;受、想、行、識,乃至十八不共法的難測量之相就不是十八不共法。舍利弗!若菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,不行色無量,就是行般若波羅蜜;不行受、相(想)、行、識,乃至不行十八不共法無量,就是行般若波羅蜜。為什麼呢?色是無量之相就不是色;受、想、行、識,乃至十八不共法的無量之相就不是十八不共法。』
舍利弗向佛稟白:『世尊!這般若波羅蜜甚深,甚深之相難見、難解、不可思量,不應當在新發意菩薩面前宣說。為什麼呢?新發意菩薩聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜,或許會驚怖,心生疑悔,不信、不行。這甚深般若波羅蜜應當在阿鞞跋致菩薩摩訶薩面前宣說;這菩薩聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖,心不疑悔,就能信而行之。』
釋提桓因問舍利弗:『若在新發意菩薩摩訶薩面前說這甚深般若波羅蜜,有什麼過失?』
舍利弗回答釋提桓因:『憍尸迦!若在新發意菩薩面前說這甚深般若波羅蜜,或許會驚怖、譏毀、不信,這在新發意菩薩或許是會有的。若新發意菩薩聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜,譏毀、不信,就種下三惡道之業;以這業的因緣故,久久難以證得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。』
以下是論釋。
論②:釋不住不習;三世色不可得;雨渧大海喻;水深淺無定喻;深水勿使小兒渡喻
論主解釋說:
那時,帝釋因為從佛那裡聽到對般若波羅蜜的讚歎已經具足,所以現在問佛:『菩薩要怎樣住於般若波羅蜜,從禪波羅蜜,乃至十八不共法?』
佛讚言『善哉!善哉』,是因為釋提桓因是諸天之中的主,說話必定可信。問這件事,能斷除大眾的疑惑,通達無礙,能作大利益,所以說:『善哉!善哉!』再者,佛因為帝釋能捨棄上妙的五欲、七寶、宮殿,能問佛賢聖所行之事,所以說『善哉』。
『以佛神力故,你能樂於問這件事』——這會中還有更上妙的諸天,觀見佛的神德無量;如今帝釋能在大眾之中諮問佛事,所以是佛的威神之力。如《持心經》所說:『佛的光明入於身中,便能問佛事。』
『佛回答憍尸迦:若菩薩不住於色等,就是修習行持般若波羅蜜』——這菩薩見到色的無常、苦等過罪,所以不住於色;若不住於色,就是能修習行持般若波羅蜜。凡夫人見色便執著色,因此生起顛倒煩惱,失掉這般若波羅蜜之道。以這緣故,不住的人,能修習行持般若波羅蜜。五眾(五蘊)、十二入、十八界也是這樣。
有人問:
為什麼不說不住六波羅蜜等就各各修習其自身之行?
回答:
這六波羅蜜等都是善法、行法,所以說:不住六度等,就說各各修習其行;而於眾、界、入,則說是修習行持般若波羅蜜。若於這些法中不執著,就斷除愛著;斷除愛著的緣故,於色等諸法之中便是清淨之習。
這裡說出不住的因緣,就是求不到色等法的住處,求不到色等法的習處。
再者,佛因為這件事難以理解,所以再說因緣:『不習色』,是這菩薩見到色的過患,所以不住於色中;不住所以不習。『習色』名為取色相,執取它是常、是無常等。再者,菩薩常行善法,正語、正業等,積習純熟深厚,所以名為『習色』。
如今菩薩因為想要行般若的緣故,散壞這色,不修習它。為什麼呢?過去的色已經滅了、未來的色還沒有,所以不可習;現在的色生時即滅所以不住,若住只一念尚且無從習,何況念念在滅?所以這裡說不習色的因緣:『三世的色不可得。』乃至十八不共法也是這樣。若能像這樣觀諸法散壞,不取相,這才名為『能修習色等諸法的實相』。
那時,舍利弗從佛那裡聽聞這義理,心生歡喜,深入空智,向佛稟白:『般若波羅蜜甚深!』
佛加以印可,成就他所讚歎的:『色等諸法之如的緣故甚深。』佛說:『不只是眼所見的色甚深,而是以般若波羅蜜分別色而契入如實,所以甚深。』如同雨滴一滴一滴,不名為甚深;會合眾流,流入大海,才名為甚深。色等也是這樣。
天眼、肉眼,所見淺而不深;若以慧眼觀察,就深不可測。因為甚深所以難可測量,唯有諸佛才能窮盡其底。
甚深而不可測量,所以名為『無量』。沒有一種智慧能取色等的實相為若常、若無常,因為籌量便有過罪的緣故。
這時,舍利弗以及諸聽法者起這樣的念頭:『般若波羅蜜不可測量、沒有限量,菩薩應當怎樣行?』
佛知道他們的念頭,告訴舍利弗:『菩薩摩訶薩若行色等甚深,就是失掉般若波羅蜜;若不行色甚深,就是得到般若波羅蜜。』
凡夫鈍根,所以說甚深;若是有一心、福德、利根的人,就不是甚深。譬如水的深淺沒有一定,對於小兒就深,對於成人就淺;乃至大海,對於人就深,對於羅睺阿修羅王就淺。像這樣,對於凡夫人、新發意、懈怠的人是甚深,對於長久積德的阿鞞跋致就淺。諸佛如同羅睺阿修羅王,於一切法沒有什麼是深的,因為得到無礙解脫的緣故。以這緣故可知:是為著眾生以及時節、利鈍、初學久修、懈怠精進的不同,才分別說深說淺。不可測量、沒有限量,也是這樣。
這裡佛親自說出因緣:『色等法的甚深之相就不是色。為什麼呢?因為怖畏、心沒、疑悔的緣故,才以色為甚深,色相本身則沒有深。』如先前所說。
舍利弗向佛稟白:『世尊!這般若波羅蜜甚深,甚深之相難見、難解。』
有人問:
上面說『菩薩不行甚深,就是行般若波羅蜜』,如今舍利弗為什麼又說『甚深』?
回答:
舍利弗不是以定執之心說甚深,他得到佛的意趣,是為人們的緣故說甚深。所以這裡說:『世尊!不應當在新發意菩薩面前說這般若波羅蜜,新學菩薩聽聞這深智慧就會心沒。應當在阿鞞跋致菩薩面前說,阿鞞跋致因為智慧深的緣故,能信而不沒。』譬如深水,不應讓小兒去渡,應教大人去渡。
帝釋問舍利弗:『若為新發意菩薩說,有什麼過失?』
舍利弗回答:『這新發意的人就會不信、心沒,心沒所以生疑悔、怖畏——若接受一切空之法,我怎麼不會墮入斷滅之中?若不接受,佛所說之法,又怎能不接受!所以怖畏、生疑悔。』若心意已定,就生起惡邪而譏毀;譏毀的果報,如〈地獄品〉中所說。這裡略說:『種下三惡道之業因緣,久久難以證得無上之道。』
經③:未受記者聞般若不驚不怖近於受記;夢中行六度譬;險道大海春樹懷妊四喻;如來善付菩薩事
釋提桓因問舍利弗:『可有還未受記的菩薩摩訶薩,聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜而不驚、不怖的嗎?』
舍利弗說:『有的!憍尸迦!若有菩薩摩訶薩聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜不驚、不怖,應當知道這菩薩,接受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之記不會太久,不會超過一佛、兩佛之世。』
佛告訴舍利弗:『正是這樣!正是這樣!這菩薩摩訶薩是久已發意、修行六波羅蜜、多多供養諸佛的,聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖、不畏,聞即受持,如般若波羅蜜中所說而行。』
那時,舍利弗向佛稟白:『世尊!我想說個譬喻。譬如求菩薩道的善男子、善女人在夢中修行般若波羅蜜、入禪定、勤行精進、具足忍辱、守護於戒、行於布施,修行內空、外空,乃至坐於道場,應當知道這善男子、善女人已接近阿耨多羅三藐三菩提;何況菩薩摩訶薩想要證得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,醒覺時修行般若波羅蜜、入禪定、勤行精進、具足忍辱、守護於戒、行於布施,怎會不快速成就阿耨多羅三藐三菩提、坐於道場!世尊!善男子、善女人善根成就,得以聽聞般若波羅蜜,受持乃至如所說而行;應當知道這菩薩摩訶薩是久已發意、種下善根、多多供養諸佛、與善知識相隨的;這人能受持般若波羅蜜乃至正憶念,應當知道這人接近於接受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之記。應當知道這善男子、善女人如同阿鞞跋致菩薩摩訶薩,於阿耨多羅三藐三菩提不動不轉,能得到甚深般若波羅蜜;得到之後,能受持、讀、誦,乃至正憶念。
『世尊!譬如有人要穿越一百由旬、或二百、三百、四百由旬的曠野險道,先見到種種相:或放牧的人、或疆界、或園林,見到這樣種種相,便知道接近城、邑、聚落了。這人見了這些相,起這樣的念頭——照我所見之相,應當知道城、邑、聚落不遠了——心得安穩,不再畏懼盜賊之難、惡蟲、飢渴。
『世尊!菩薩摩訶薩也是這樣,若得到這甚深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念,應當知道接近得受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之記不久了,應當知道這菩薩摩訶薩不必畏懼墮入聲聞、辟支佛地。這些就是先相,也就是甚深般若波羅蜜,得以聽聞、得以看見、得以領受乃至正憶念的緣故。』
佛告訴舍利弗:『正是這樣!正是這樣!你還樂於再說的話,就說吧。』
『世尊!譬如有人想要見大海,發心前往,一路上不再見到樹之相、不再見到山之相,這人雖然還沒有見到大海,也知道大海不遠了。為什麼呢?大海之處地勢平坦,沒有樹相、沒有山相的緣故。像這樣,世尊!菩薩摩訶薩聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜、受持乃至正憶念時,雖然還沒有在佛前接受劫數之記,或一百劫、一千劫、一萬劫、百千萬億劫,這菩薩自己知道接近接受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之記不久了。為什麼呢?因為我得以聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念的緣故。
『世尊!譬如初春時節,諸樹的舊葉已經凋落,應當知道這樹新葉、華、果出現不久了。為什麼呢?因為見到這些樹的先相的緣故,知道如今不久便要生葉、開華、結果;這時閻浮提的人們,見到樹的先相,都大為歡喜。世尊!菩薩摩訶薩得以聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念、如所說而行,應當知道這菩薩善根成就、多多供養過諸佛。這菩薩應當起這樣的念頭——先世善根所追隨,趣向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以這因緣故,得以看見、得以聽聞這甚深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念、如所說而行。這會中曾見過佛的諸天子,歡喜踊躍,起這樣的念頭說:從前諸菩薩摩訶薩也有這樣的受記先相,如今這菩薩摩訶薩接受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之記也不久了。
『世尊!譬如婦人懷孕,身體苦重,行步不便,坐起不安,睡眠飲食轉少,不喜言語,厭棄原本的習好,因為承受苦痛的緣故;有別的婦人見到她這些先相,便知道臨產不久了。菩薩摩訶薩也是這樣,種下善根、多多供養諸佛、久行六波羅蜜、與善知識相隨,善根成就,得以聽聞甚深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念、如所說而行;諸菩薩也知道這菩薩摩訶薩得到阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之記不久了。』
佛告訴舍利弗:『善哉!善哉!你所樂說的,都是佛力。』
那時,須菩提向佛稟白:『希有!世尊!諸多陀阿伽度、阿羅呵、三藐三佛陀(如來、應供、正遍知)善於付囑諸菩薩摩訶薩之事!』
佛告訴須菩提:『這些菩薩摩訶薩發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,使眾多眾生得到安穩,使無量眾生得到快樂,是為了憐愍、安樂、饒益諸天人的緣故。這些菩薩行菩薩道時,以四事攝受無量百千眾生,就是布施、愛語、利益、同事;也以十善道成就眾生。自己行初禪,也教他人行初禪;乃至自己行非有想非無想處,也教他人行乃至非有想非無想處。自己行檀波羅蜜,也教他人行檀波羅蜜;自己行尸羅波羅蜜,也教他人行尸羅波羅蜜;自己行羼提波羅蜜,也教他人行羼提波羅蜜;自己行毘梨耶波羅蜜,也教他人行毘梨耶波羅蜜;自己行禪波羅蜜,也教他人行禪波羅蜜;自己行般若波羅蜜,也教他人行般若波羅蜜。這菩薩得到般若波羅蜜,以方便力教導眾生使他們證得須陀洹果,自己於內不取證;教導眾生使他們證得斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果,自己於內不取證;教導眾生使他們證得辟支佛道,自己於內不取證。自己行六波羅蜜,也教無量百千萬諸菩薩行六波羅蜜。自己住於阿鞞跋致地,也教他人住於阿鞞跋致地。自己清淨佛世界,也教他人清淨佛世界。自己成就眾生,也教他人成就眾生。自己得到菩薩神通,也教他人得到菩薩神通。自己清淨陀羅尼門,也教他人清淨陀羅尼門。自己具足樂說辯才,也教他人具足樂說辯才。自己受色成就,也教他人受色成就。自己成就三十二相,也教他人成就三十二相。自己成就童真地,也教他人成就童真地。自己成就佛十力,也教他人成就佛十力。自己行四無所畏,也教他人行四無所畏。自己行十八不共法,也教他人行十八不共法。自己行大慈、大悲,也教他人行大慈大悲。自己得到一切種智,也教他人得到一切種智。自己離一切結使及習氣,也教他人離一切結使及習氣。自己轉法輪,也教他人轉法輪。』
以下是論釋。
論③:釋吞鉤之魚喻;險道四譬合解;安穩多眾生之義;四攝法廣說;自行教他乃至轉法輪
論主解釋說:
那時,帝釋問舍利弗:『可有還未受記的菩薩,聽聞這甚深般若而不驚、不怖的嗎?』
舍利弗說:『沒有未受記而聽聞般若能生信的。若有時真能生信,應當知道他垂近於受記,不過再見一佛、二佛,便得受記。』
佛認可舍利弗的話。
舍利弗聽到佛認可他所說,心生歡喜;又想把這件事分辨得明明白白,所以說譬喻,這樣說道:『夢中之心被睡眠所覆蓋,不是真心所作;若善男子、善女人在夢中發意修行六波羅蜜乃至坐於道場,應當知道這人福德雖然輕微,也已接近於接受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之記。何況菩薩摩訶薩醒覺時以真實心發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提、修行六波羅蜜,怎會不接近受記!世尊!若人在六道生死之中往來,有時得以聽聞般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦、正憶念,必定知道這人不久便得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。』
如同吞了鉤的魚,雖然還在池中游戲,應當知道被拉出水面不久了;行者也是這樣,深深信樂般若波羅蜜,不會久住於生死。
這裡舍利弗自己說出譬喻的合法——
『若人要穿越險道』:『險道』就是世間。『百由旬』是欲界,『二百由旬』是色界,『三百由旬』是無色界,『四百由旬』是聲聞、辟支佛道。
再者,『四百由旬』是欲界,『三百由旬』是色界,『二百由旬』是無色界,『百由旬』是聲聞、辟支佛。
『想要出離』的,是信受修行般若波羅蜜的人。『先見諸法相』,是見到大菩薩捨棄世間欲樂,深心愛樂般若波羅蜜。『疆界』,是分別諸法——這是聲聞法、這是辟支佛法、這是大乘法;像這樣,小利是聲聞,大利是菩薩;魔界是生死,佛界是般若波羅蜜、甘露法味不死之處。『園林』,是隨順佛道的禪定、智慧等法樂。像這樣有無量善法之相。『聚落』是柔順法忍,『邑』是無生法忍,『城』是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。『得安穩』,是菩薩聽聞這法,思惟籌量而行:『我得到這法心中安穩,將會證得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。』『賊』,是我見等六十二種邪見。『惡蟲』,是貪愛、瞋恚等諸煩惱。『不畏賊』,是人不能得其便。『不畏惡蟲』,是非人不能得其便。『不畏飢』,是不畏懼不能得到聖人的真智慧。『不畏渴』,是不畏懼不能得到禪定、解脫等法樂之味。
這裡自己說出因緣:『菩薩摩訶薩得到先相的,不久便當證得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。』
『不畏懼墮於惡道之中、飢餓而死』,是不畏懼墮入聲聞、辟支佛地。
佛認可他的譬喻,以粗顯之事比喻細微之理,以世間比喻出世間。
其餘三個譬喻,也應像上面這樣分別解說。
『大海水』是無上之道;『平地無樹無山』,是般若波羅蜜經卷等。
『樹果』是無上之道,『樹華』是阿鞞跋致地;『春時舊葉凋落,更生新葉』,是諸煩惱、邪見、疑等滅除,能得到般若波羅蜜經卷等。
『婦人』是行者,『所懷之身』是無上之道,『臨產之相』是菩薩長久修習行持般若波羅蜜;『厭棄原本的習好』是厭患世間婬欲之樂,不再喜好貪著。
佛讚歎他所說『善哉』!
那時,須菩提聽到佛認可舍利弗所說,讚他善哉,知道佛的心意深深敬念這些菩薩,所以向佛稟白:『世尊!甚為希有!善於付囑菩薩之事。』『菩薩事』,是空道、福德道;也如佛以種種總相、別相解說,用以寄付給阿難、彌勒等,入無餘涅槃之後,要好好地自行奉行、教示他人,利益眾生,不要有謬誤差錯!
佛說出善付囑的因緣:諸菩薩發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。
『使多眾生安穩』——一切眾生之中,無量無邊阿僧祇,除了佛沒有誰能計算了知;從佛得到利益的不可計數,所以名為『多』。『安穩』,是眾生執著常,就教以無常;執著樂的,教以苦;執著實的,教以空;執著我的,教以無我——像這樣名為安穩。凡夫人聽了這些,當時雖然不喜樂,久久滅除諸煩惱,便得安穩之樂;如同服苦藥,當時雖苦,之後得以除去病患。『使無量眾生得樂』——菩薩求般若波羅蜜還沒有成就時,以今世、後世之樂利益眾生,如《菩薩本生經》所說。若得到般若波羅蜜,已斷諸煩惱,就也以世間樂、出世間樂利益眾生;若證得無上道時,就只以出世間樂利益眾生。『安樂、饒益』,是只以憐愍心而安樂、饒益。饒,是多多利益天、人;其餘諸道中饒益少,所以不說。
『利益之事』,就是四攝法。以財施、法施二種攝取眾生。『愛語』有二種:一是隨其心意的愛語,二是隨其所愛之法而為解說。這菩薩還沒有得道時,憐愍眾生,自己破除憍慢,隨其心意說法。若得了道,就隨其所應度之法而為解說:對心高氣傲的富人,為他讚歎布施,因為這人能得到他人財物之利、名聲、福德的緣故;若為他讚歎持戒、譏斥破戒,他心裡就不喜樂——像這樣,隨其所應而為說法。『利益』也有二種:一是為今世之利、後世之利而說法,以法謀生,勤修有利之事;二是使未信的教他信,破戒的使他持戒,寡聞的使他多聞,不布施的使他布施,愚癡的教以智慧——像這樣,以善法利益眾生。『同事』,是菩薩教化眾生,使他們行善法,自己與他們同行其事;菩薩是善心,眾生是惡心,能轉化其惡,使他同於自己之善。
這菩薩以四種攝法攝受眾生,使他們住於十善道,這是廣說四攝之義。於二施之中取法施。隨其所樂而為說法,是愛語中的第一;眾生愛惜壽命,使他們行十善道,就得長壽。利益,於一切寶物之利中,法利最為殊勝,這就是利益。同事之中,同行善法為最勝;這菩薩自己行十善,也用以教人。
有人說:後面的自行十善等,就是第四同事之義,所以說:『自己行十善,也教人行。』
『自己行初禪,也教他人行』——初禪等同是離欲、同是持戒,所以名為相攝;因為相攝,漸漸能以三乘之法度脫。乃至非有想非無想處,也是這樣。自己行六波羅蜜,也用以教他人。
因般若的緣故使眾生得到般若之分,就是證得須陀洹等;以方便力故自己不取證。這人福德、智慧之力增益的緣故,能教無量阿僧祇菩薩使他們住於六波羅蜜。自己住於阿鞞跋致地等,也用以教他人;乃至自己轉法輪,也教他人轉法輪。
所以我是以慈悲心的緣故善付囑這菩薩之事,不是以愛著的緣故。
以上是《大智度論》卷第六十六。
This fascicle is titled Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on Chapter Forty-Five, "Praise of Practising in Faith" (Fascicle Sixty-Six).
Sūtra ①: Śakra Thinks That Those Who Hear Prajñā Made Merit in Former Lives; Śāriputra Says That Both Paths, Faith and Disparagement, Come from Former Lives; Śakra Worships Prajñā; to Worship Prajñā Is to Worship Omniscience
At that time Śakra Devānām Indra gave rise to this thought: ‘If good men and good women have the prajñāpāramitā sūtra reach their ears, these people made merit under the buddhas in former lives and kept company with good friends—how much more those who receive and uphold it, draw near to it, read it, recite it, rightly recollect it, and practise as it is taught! Know that these good men and good women have drawn near to many buddhas, and are able to hear, to receive, to practise as it is taught, able to ask, able to answer; know that these good men and good women, because in former lives they made offerings to and drew near to many buddhas, on hearing this very deep prajñāpāramitā are not startled, not terrified, not afraid; know that these people have also, for immeasurable koṭi of kalpas, practised dānapāramitā (the perfection of giving), śīlapāramitā (the perfection of morality), kṣāntipāramitā (the perfection of patience), vīryapāramitā (the perfection of vigour), dhyānapāramitā, and prajñāpāramitā.’
At that time Śāriputra addressed the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! If there are good men and good women who hear this very deep prajñāpāramitā and are not startled, not terrified, not afraid, and having heard it receive and uphold it, draw near to it, and train in it as it is taught, know that these good men and good women are like an avaivartika (non-retrogressing) bodhisattva-mahāsattva. Why? World-Honored One! This prajñāpāramitā is very deep! If in former lives one has not long practised dānapāramitā, śīlapāramitā, kṣāntipāramitā, vīryapāramitā, dhyānapāramitā, and prajñāpāramitā, one can never believe in and understand the very deep prajñāpāramitā. World-Honored One! If there are good men and good women who disparage the very deep prajñāpāramitā, know that these people in former lives also disparaged the very deep prajñāpāramitā. Why? When these good men and good women hear someone expound the very deep prajñāpāramitā, they have no faith, no love and delight, and their minds are not pure; know that these good men and good women in former lives never inquired of, never searched out with, the buddhas and the buddhas' disciples—how one ought to practise dānapāramitā, śīlapāramitā, kṣāntipāramitā, vīryapāramitā, dhyānapāramitā, and prajñāpāramitā? How one ought to cultivate inner emptiness, and so on up to how one ought to cultivate the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas? How one ought to cultivate the four foundations of mindfulness, and so on up to how one ought to cultivate the eight limbs of the noble path? How one ought to cultivate the ten powers of the Buddha, and so on up to how one ought to cultivate the eighteen unshared dharmas?’
Śakra Devānām Indra said to Śāriputra: ‘This very deep prajñāpāramitā—if there are good men and good women who have not long practised dānapāramitā, śīlapāramitā, kṣāntipāramitā, vīryapāramitā, dhyānapāramitā, and prajñāpāramitā, have not practised inner emptiness up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas, have not practised the four dhyānas, the four immeasurable minds, and the four formless absorptions, have not practised the four foundations of mindfulness up to the eight limbs of the noble path, have not practised the ten powers of the Buddha up to the eighteen unshared dharmas—what is there to wonder at if such people do not believe in and understand this very deep prajñāpāramitā! Venerable Śāriputra! I worship prajñāpāramitā! To worship prajñāpāramitā is to worship omniscience.’
The Buddha said to Śakra Devānām Indra: ‘Just so! Just so! Kauśika! To worship prajñāpāramitā is to worship omniscience. Why? Kauśika! The omniscience of the buddhas is all born from prajñāpāramitā, and omniscience is prajñāpāramitā. For this reason, Kauśika! Good men and good women who wish to abide in omniscience ought to abide in prajñāpāramitā. If good men and good women wish to give rise to knowledge of the kinds of paths, they ought to train in prajñāpāramitā; if they wish to cut off all the fetters together with the residual habits, they ought to train in prajñāpāramitā. Good men and good women who wish to turn the wheel of the Dharma ought to train in prajñāpāramitā. Good men and good women who wish to attain the fruit of srota-āpanna, the fruit of sakṛdāgāmin, the fruit of anāgāmin, and the fruit of arhatship ought to train in prajñāpāramitā; if they wish to attain the pratyekabuddha path, they ought to train in prajñāpāramitā; if they wish to teach beings and cause them to attain the fruit of srota-āpanna, the fruit of sakṛdāgāmin, the fruit of anāgāmin, the fruit of arhatship, and the pratyekabuddha path, they ought to train in prajñāpāramitā. If good men and good women wish to teach beings and cause them to attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi (unsurpassed, right, and complete awakening), if they wish to gather and lead the whole assembly of the bhikṣu saṅgha, they ought to train in prajñāpāramitā.’
What follows is the treatise's explanation.
Treatise ①: Explaining Śakra's Arousing of a Mind That Finds It Rare; the Simile of Dry Wool and Wet Wool; the Similes of Planting in Space and of the Inchworm; Three Accounts of Why Those Who Disparage It Can Hear Prajñā Again
The treatise-author explains:
Śakra Devānām Indra is the lord of the gods; because his faculties are sharp, his wisdom is excellent, and his faith in the Buddha-dharma is deep, it is increased all the more—like fire that gets wind and burns ever more fiercely. He heard Subhūti praise prajñāpāramitā by all kinds of causes and conditions, and the Buddha, moreover, with deep principle, confirmed what he had praised. Śakra aroused a mind that found it rare, and gave rise to this thought: if good men and good women have the scripture of prajñā reach their ears, these people in former lives made offerings to many buddhas and made great merit, and in this life are able to meet good friends—good teachers, fellow students, and the like. Because of the cause of having made offerings to the buddhas in former lives, and relying on the condition of good friends in this life, they hear prajñāpāramitā and are able to give rise to faith; how much more those who read, recite, reflect on, rightly recollect it, cultivate dhyāna and concentration, weigh and discriminate its meaning, and are able to accomplish its matter! Know that these people have heard the meaning of the very deep prajñāpāramitā from the buddhas of the past and the buddhas' disciples, have believed and received it, and are not terrified, not afraid. Why? These people for immeasurable asaṃkhyeya (numberless) kalpas practised the six perfections and all kinds of merit, and so, although they have not yet attained the ground of the avaivartika, within the deep Dharma they do not doubt and do not regret. It is like freshly split dry wool, which drifts east and west with the wind; wet wool, pressed tight and dense, cannot be blown. The bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind is also like this: one who has not long cultivated virtue, whose merit made is shallow and thin, and who follows what others say, cannot believe and receive prajñāpāramitā; one who has long cultivated and gathered merit and does not follow what others say can believe and receive the very deep prajñāpāramitā, not startled, not terrified.
When Śakra was reflecting on and recollecting that prajñāpāramitā has immeasurable merit, Śāriputra knew what Śakra was thinking in his mind, and so addressed the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! Although good men and good women have not yet entered the position of a bodhisattva, if they can believe and receive the very deep prajñāpāramitā, not startled, not terrified, and practise as it is taught, then these people, because of great merit, wisdom, and the power of faith, should be known to be no different from an avaivartika.’
Here the Buddha himself states the causes and conditions: prajñāpāramitā is very deep! There is no mark that can be grasped, can be believed, can be received; if one can believe and receive it, this is rare! It is like a person planting in space—this is extremely hard! All ordinary people, when they gain a superior dharma, abandon the matter they relied on before; for instance, gaining the bliss of dhyāna and concentration, they abandon the pleasure of the five desires, and so on up to relying on the Summit of Existence, they abandon the merit of the sphere of nothingness; they cannot abandon anything without something to rely on. It is like an inchworm crawling along a branch: it settles its front feet, and only then pushes its hind feet forward; when it has crawled to the tip of the tree and there is no further place to rely on, it goes back to where it was. This bodhisattva has not yet attained the path, and has nothing to rely on above prajñāpāramitā, yet he can cultivate and gather merit and abandon the five desires—this matter is rare! Here the causes and conditions are stated: ‘These people in former lives believed and received it, long practised the six perfections, and vastly accumulated all kinds of merit.’
What runs contrary to faith is disparagement of prajñāpāramitā. Just as a person of deep and thick merit comes from long accumulation, so a person who does not believe and disparages also comes from long habituation.
Someone asks:
If in former lives one disparaged and slandered it, one ought to fall into the hells; by what condition can one again hear prajñā?
The answer:
Someone says: This person, having finished undergoing the retribution of the offence of falling into the hells, came back and disparaged it again; this is said without reference to the very next life.
Someone says: Only when karma made is accumulated deep and heavy can it give its fruit of retribution; though this person did not believe in a former life, the karma accumulated was not yet deep and thick, and so it has not yet yielded its fruit of retribution; because of his remaining merit he is born among humans, and in continuation again does not believe.
Furthermore, someone says: For the offences of the five heinous sins, the retribution is necessarily undergone in the very next life; the other offences are not so—they are undergone either in the very next life or in a life long after.
At that time Śakra said to Śāriputra: ‘This prajñāpāramitā is very deep because it is ultimate emptiness and without anything existent. When a bodhisattva has not long practised merit, his clinging mind is firm and his power of faith is weak; what is there to wonder at if he does not believe in prajñāpāramitā, and so on up to omniscience?’
Śakra reflected and weighed it: ‘The merit of believing in prajñāpāramitā is immeasurable; the offence gained by one who does not believe is deep and heavy.’ Because he deeply loved and revered prajñāpāramitā, he spoke these words: ‘I ought to worship this prajñā! Why? To worship prajñāpāramitā is to worship omniscience; to worship omniscience is to worship the buddhas of the three times and the ten directions.’
At that time the Buddha approved his words, and further proclaimed the causes and conditions of praising prajñāpāramitā, namely that all the wisdom of the buddhas is born from within prajñā; therefore he said: ‘If there is a bodhisattva who wishes to abide in omniscience, and so on up to gathering and leading the whole assembly of the bhikṣu saṅgha, he ought to train in prajñāpāramitā.’
Sūtra ②: Not Abiding in Form Is Practising Prajñā by Habit; Prajñā Is Very Deep, Hard to Fathom, Immeasurable; Not Practising the Very Deep Is Practising Prajñā; It Should Not Be Spoken Before Bodhisattvas Who Have Newly Aroused the Mind
Śakra Devānām Indra addressed the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! When a bodhisattva-mahāsattva wishes to practise prajñāpāramitā, how is he called abiding in prajñāpāramitā, dhyānapāramitā, vīryapāramitā, kṣāntipāramitā, śīlapāramitā, and dānapāramitā? How does he abide in inner emptiness up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas? How does he abide in the four dhyānas, the four immeasurable minds, the four formless absorptions, and the five supernormal powers? How does he abide in the four foundations of mindfulness up to the eight limbs of the noble path? How does he abide in the ten powers of the Buddha up to the eighteen unshared dharmas? World-Honored One! How should a bodhisattva-mahāsattva train in prajñāpāramitā up to dānapāramitā, inner emptiness up to the eighteen unshared dharmas?’
The Buddha said to Śakra Devānām Indra: ‘Excellent! Excellent! Kauśika! That you are able to delight in asking this matter is all the Buddha's spiritual power! Kauśika! If, when a bodhisattva-mahāsattva trains in prajñāpāramitā, he does not abide in form, that is practising prajñāpāramitā; if he does not abide in feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, that is training in prajñāpāramitā. Eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind; forms, sounds, smells, tastes, tangibles, and dharmas; the eye-element up to the mind-consciousness-element are likewise. Kauśika! If a bodhisattva-mahāsattva does not abide in prajñāpāramitā, that is training in prajñāpāramitā; not abiding in dhyānapāramitā is training in dhyānapāramitā; not abiding in vīryapāramitā is training in vīryapāramitā; not abiding in kṣāntipāramitā is training in kṣāntipāramitā; not abiding in śīlapāramitā is training in śīlapāramitā; not abiding in dānapāramitā is training in dānapāramitā. Thus, Kauśika! This is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva not abiding in prajñāpāramitā and yet training in prajñāpāramitā. Kauśika! Not abiding in inner emptiness is training in inner emptiness; and so on up to: not abiding in the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas is training in the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas. Not abiding in the four dhyānas is training in the four dhyānas; not abiding in the four immeasurable minds is training in the four immeasurable minds; not abiding in the four formless absorptions is training in the four formless absorptions; not abiding in the five supernormal powers is training in the five supernormal powers. Not abiding in the four foundations of mindfulness is training in the four foundations of mindfulness; and so on up to: not abiding in the eight limbs of the noble path is training in the eight limbs of the noble path. Not abiding in the ten powers of the Buddha is training in the ten powers of the Buddha; and so on up to: not abiding in the eighteen unshared dharmas is training in the eighteen unshared dharmas. Why? Kauśika! This bodhisattva seeks and does not find in form any place that can be abided in or trained; and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas: he likewise seeks and does not find in the eighteen unshared dharmas any place that can be abided in or trained. Furthermore, Kauśika! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva does not train in form; if he does not train in form, this is called training in form; feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, are likewise. Why? This bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates form: its prior limit is unfindable, its middle limit is unfindable, its later limit is unfindable; and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, likewise.’
Śāriputra addressed the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! This prajñāpāramitā is very deep!’
The Buddha said: ‘Because the suchness of form is very deep, prajñāpāramitā is very deep; because the suchness of feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness is very deep, prajñāpāramitā is very deep; and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, likewise.’
Śāriputra said: ‘World-Honored One! This prajñāpāramitā is hard to fathom!’
The Buddha said: ‘Because form is hard to fathom, prajñāpāramitā is hard to fathom; because feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, are hard to fathom, prajñāpāramitā is hard to fathom.’
‘World-Honored One! This prajñāpāramitā is immeasurable!’
The Buddha said: ‘Because form is immeasurable, prajñāpāramitā is immeasurable; because feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, are immeasurable, prajñāpāramitā is immeasurable.’
The Buddha said to Śāriputra: ‘If, when a bodhisattva-mahāsattva practises prajñāpāramitā, he does not practise the very-deepness of form, that is practising prajñāpāramitā; if he does not practise the very-deepness of feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, up to not practising the very-deepness of the eighteen unshared dharmas, that is practising prajñāpāramitā. Why? The mark of the very-deepness of form is not form; the mark of the very-deepness of feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, is not the eighteen unshared dharmas. Not practising in this way is practising prajñāpāramitā. Śāriputra! If, when a bodhisattva-mahāsattva practises prajñāpāramitā, he does not practise form's being hard to fathom, that is practising prajñāpāramitā; if he does not practise feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, up to not practising the eighteen unshared dharmas' being hard to fathom, that is practising prajñāpāramitā. Why? The mark of form's being hard to fathom is not form; the mark of feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas' being hard to fathom, is not the eighteen unshared dharmas. Śāriputra! If, when a bodhisattva-mahāsattva practises prajñāpāramitā, he does not practise form's being immeasurable, that is practising prajñāpāramitā; if he does not practise feeling, mark (read: perception), constructions, and consciousness, up to not practising the eighteen unshared dharmas' being immeasurable, that is practising prajñāpāramitā. Why? The mark of form's being immeasurable is not form; the mark of feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas' being immeasurable, is not the eighteen unshared dharmas.’
Śāriputra addressed the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! This prajñāpāramitā is very deep; the mark of its very-deepness is hard to see, hard to understand, and cannot be conceived; it ought not to be spoken before a bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind. Why? A bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind, on hearing this very deep prajñāpāramitā, may be startled and terrified, give rise to doubt and regret in his mind, and not believe and not practise. This very deep prajñāpāramitā ought to be spoken before an avaivartika bodhisattva-mahāsattva; this bodhisattva, on hearing this very deep prajñāpāramitā, is not startled, not terrified, and his mind does not doubt or regret, and so he can believe it and practise it.’
Śakra Devānām Indra asked Śāriputra: ‘If this very deep prajñāpāramitā is spoken before a bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has newly aroused the mind, what fault is there?’
Śāriputra answered Śakra Devānām Indra: ‘Kauśika! If this very deep prajñāpāramitā is spoken before a bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind, he may be startled and terrified, disparage it, and not believe; this may well happen with a bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind. If a bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind hears this very deep prajñāpāramitā, disparages it, and does not believe, he plants the karma of the three evil destinies; by the causes and conditions of this karma, for a long, long time it is hard for him to attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi.’
What follows is the treatise's explanation.
Treatise ②: Explaining Not Abiding and Not Cultivating by Habit; Form in the Three Times Is Unfindable; the Simile of Raindrops and the Great Sea; the Simile That the Depth of Water Is Not Fixed; the Simile of Not Letting a Small Child Cross Deep Water
The treatise-author explains:
At that time Śakra, because he had already heard in full from the Buddha the praise of prajñāpāramitā, now asked the Buddha: ‘How should a bodhisattva abide in prajñāpāramitā, from dhyānapāramitā up to the eighteen unshared dharmas?’
The Buddha praised him, saying ‘Excellent! Excellent!’, because Śakra Devānām Indra is the lord among the gods, and his words are sure to be trusted. Asking this matter can cut off the doubts of the great assembly, penetrates without obstruction, and can bring great benefit; therefore he said: ‘Excellent! Excellent!’ Furthermore, because Śakra could abandon the supreme and wondrous five desires, the seven jewels, and palaces, and could ask about the matters practised by the buddhas and the worthy and noble ones, the Buddha said ‘Excellent’.
‘By the Buddha's spiritual power you are able to delight in asking this matter’—in this assembly there are gods still more supreme and wondrous, who observe that the Buddha's spiritual virtue is immeasurable; now that Śakra is able, in the midst of the great assembly, to inquire about the Buddha's matters, it is therefore the Buddha's majestic spiritual power. As the Sūtra of Holding the Mind says: ‘The Buddha's light enters into the body, and then one is able to ask about the Buddha's matters.’
‘The Buddha answered Kauśika: if a bodhisattva does not abide in form and so on, that is training in prajñāpāramitā’—this bodhisattva sees the faults of form, such as impermanence and suffering, and so does not abide in form; if he does not abide in form, he is able to train in prajñāpāramitā. Ordinary people, seeing form, cling to form, and from this give rise to inverted afflictions and lose this path of prajñāpāramitā. For this reason, one who does not abide is able to train in prajñāpāramitā. The five aggregates (the five skandhas), the twelve sense-fields, and the eighteen elements are likewise.
Someone asks:
Why is it not said that by not abiding in the six perfections and so on one cultivates each of them in its own practice?
The answer:
These six perfections and so on are all wholesome dharmas and dharmas of practice, and so it is said: not abiding in the six perfections and so on is said to be cultivating each of them in its practice; whereas for the aggregates, the elements, and the sense-fields, it is said to be training in prajñāpāramitā. If one does not cling within these dharmas, one cuts off loving attachment; because loving attachment is cut off, within form and the other dharmas there is pure habituation.
Here the causes and conditions of not abiding are stated, namely that one seeks and does not find a place of abiding in form and the other dharmas, and seeks and does not find a place of habituation in form and the other dharmas.
Furthermore, because this matter is hard to understand, the Buddha again states causes and conditions: ‘Not training in form’ means that this bodhisattva sees the faults of form, and so does not abide in form; not abiding, therefore he does not train in it. ‘Training in form’ is called grasping at the mark of form, grasping at it as permanent, as impermanent, and so on. Furthermore, the bodhisattva constantly trains in wholesome dharmas—right speech, right action, and so on—and his accumulated habituation is ripe and deep, and so it is called ‘cultivating form’.
Now the bodhisattva, because he wishes to train in prajñā, scatters and breaks up this form and does not cultivate it. Why? Past form has already ceased and future form does not yet exist, so they cannot be trained; present form ceases as it arises and so does not abide—if it abided for only a single thought, there would still be no way to train in it, how much less when it is ceasing thought after thought? Therefore here the causes and conditions of not training in form are stated: ‘Form in the three times is unfindable.’ And so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, likewise. If one can contemplate all dharmas as scattered and broken up in this way, and not grasp at marks, this is called ‘being able to train in the real mark of form and the other dharmas’.
At that time Śāriputra, having heard this meaning from the Buddha, rejoiced in his mind, entered deeply into the wisdom of emptiness, and addressed the Buddha: ‘Prajñāpāramitā is very deep!’
The Buddha approved it, confirming what he had praised: ‘It is very deep because of the suchness of form and the other dharmas.’ The Buddha said: ‘It is not only that form seen by the eye is very deep; rather, because one discriminates form with prajñāpāramitā and accords with it as it really is, it is very deep.’ It is like raindrops, drop by drop, which are not called very deep; only when they join the many streams and flow into the great sea are they called very deep. Form and the rest are likewise.
The divine eye and the fleshly eye see shallowly and not deeply; if one observes with the wisdom-eye, it is deep beyond fathoming. Because it is very deep it is hard to fathom; only the buddhas can exhaust its bottom.
It is very deep and cannot be fathomed, and so it is called ‘immeasurable’. There is no wisdom at all that can grasp the real mark of form and the rest as permanent or as impermanent, because in reckoning and measuring there is fault.
At this time Śāriputra and all who were listening to the Dharma gave rise to this thought: ‘Prajñāpāramitā cannot be fathomed and has no limit; how should a bodhisattva practise?’
The Buddha knew their thought and said to Śāriputra: ‘If a bodhisattva-mahāsattva practises the very-deepness of form and the rest, he loses prajñāpāramitā; if he does not practise the very-deepness of form, he gains prajñāpāramitā.’
Ordinary people are of dull faculties, and so it is said to be very deep; for a person of one-pointed mind, of merit, of sharp faculties, it is not very deep. It is like water, whose depth and shallowness are not fixed: to a small child it is deep, to a grown man it is shallow; and so on up to the great sea, which to a human is deep and to the asura king Rāhu is shallow. Thus, to ordinary people, to those who have newly aroused the mind, and to the lazy, it is very deep; to the avaivartika who has long accumulated virtue it is shallow. The buddhas are like the asura king Rāhu: among all dharmas there is none that is deep to them, because they have attained unobstructed liberation. For this reason one can know: it is because of differences among beings, and of season, of sharp and dull faculties, of beginning learners and long cultivators, of the lazy and the vigorous, that deep and shallow are distinguished and spoken of. Not being able to be fathomed and having no limit are likewise.
Here the Buddha himself states the causes and conditions: ‘The mark of the very-deepness of form and the other dharmas is not form. Why? Because of fear, the sinking of the mind, and doubt and regret, form is taken to be very deep; the mark of form itself has no depth.’ As was said before.
Śāriputra addressed the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! This prajñāpāramitā is very deep; the mark of its very-deepness is hard to see and hard to understand.’
Someone asks:
Above it was said, ‘A bodhisattva who does not practise the very deep is practising prajñāpāramitā’; why now does Śāriputra again say ‘very deep’?
The answer:
Śāriputra does not say it is very deep with a mind that fixedly clings; he has grasped the Buddha's intent, and says it is very deep for the sake of people. Therefore here it says: ‘World-Honored One! This prajñāpāramitā ought not to be spoken before a bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind; a bodhisattva new to the training, on hearing this deep wisdom, will have his mind sink. It ought to be spoken before an avaivartika bodhisattva; the avaivartika, because his wisdom is deep, can believe and does not sink.’ It is like deep water: one ought not to let a small child cross it; one ought to have a grown person cross it.
Śakra asked Śāriputra: ‘If it is spoken for a bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind, what fault is there?’
Śāriputra answered: ‘This person who has newly aroused the mind will not believe and his mind will sink; because his mind sinks, he gives rise to doubt and regret, fear and dread—if I accept the dharma that all is empty, how shall I not fall into annihilation? If I do not accept it, it is the Dharma spoken by the Buddha—how can I not accept it! And so he is afraid and gives rise to doubt and regret.’ If his mind has become settled, he gives rise to evil and wrongness and disparages it; the retribution of disparagement is as said in the "Chapter on the Hells". Here it is said in brief: ‘He plants the causes and conditions of the karma of the three evil destinies; for a long, long time it is hard for him to attain the unsurpassed path.’
Sūtra ③: Those Not Yet Predicted Who Hear Prajñā Without Being Startled or Terrified Are Near to Receiving the Prediction; the Comparison of Practising the Six Perfections in a Dream; the Four Similes of the Dangerous Road, the Great Sea, the Trees in Spring, and the Pregnant Woman; the Tathāgata Entrusts Well the Affairs of the Bodhisattvas
Śakra Devānām Indra asked Śāriputra: ‘Is there a bodhisattva-mahāsattva not yet having received the prediction who hears this very deep prajñāpāramitā and is not startled, not terrified?’
Śāriputra said: ‘There is! Kauśika! If there is a bodhisattva-mahāsattva who hears this very deep prajñāpāramitā and is not startled, not terrified, know that this bodhisattva will receive the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi before long, within no more than the age of one buddha or two buddhas.’
The Buddha said to Śāriputra: ‘Just so! Just so! This bodhisattva-mahāsattva aroused intent long ago, has practised the six perfections, and has made offerings to many buddhas; on hearing this very deep prajñāpāramitā he is not startled, not terrified, not afraid; as soon as he hears it he receives and upholds it, and practises as is taught in prajñāpāramitā.’
At that time Śāriputra addressed the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! I wish to speak a simile. Suppose good men and good women who seek the bodhisattva path, in a dream, practise prajñāpāramitā, enter dhyāna and concentration, diligently practise vigour, are complete in patience, guard morality, practise giving, and practise inner emptiness and outer emptiness, and so on up to sitting at the seat of awakening—know that these good men and good women are already near to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi; how much more a bodhisattva-mahāsattva who wishes to attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi and, while awake, practises prajñāpāramitā, enters dhyāna and concentration, diligently practises vigour, is complete in patience, guards morality, and practises giving—how could he not swiftly accomplish anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi and sit at the seat of awakening! World-Honored One! When good men and good women, their roots of goodness accomplished, are able to hear prajñāpāramitā, and receive and uphold it, up to practising as it is taught, know that this bodhisattva-mahāsattva aroused intent long ago, planted roots of goodness, made offerings to many buddhas, and kept company with good friends; this person is able to receive and uphold prajñāpāramitā, up to rightly recollecting it; know that this person is near to receiving the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. Know that these good men and good women are like an avaivartika bodhisattva-mahāsattva, unmoved and unturning toward anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, able to gain the very deep prajñāpāramitā; having gained it, able to receive and uphold it, read it, recite it, up to rightly recollecting it.
‘World-Honored One! Suppose a person wishes to cross a wilderness on a dangerous road of a hundred yojanas, or two hundred, three hundred, or four hundred yojanas; first he sees all kinds of signs: perhaps herdsmen, perhaps boundary marks, perhaps gardens; seeing such signs of all kinds, he knows that he is near a city, a town, a village. This person, having seen these signs, gives rise to this thought—by the signs I have seen, know that the city, the town, the village is not far—and his mind gains peace; he no longer fears the danger of bandits, evil insects, hunger, and thirst.
‘World-Honored One! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva is also like this: if he gains this very deep prajñāpāramitā, and receives and upholds it, reads it, recites it, up to rightly recollecting it, know that it is not long before he is near to receiving the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi; know that this bodhisattva-mahāsattva need not fear falling to the ground of the śrāvakas or the pratyekabuddhas. These are the prior signs, which are that the very deep prajñāpāramitā is heard, is seen, is received, up to being rightly recollected.’
The Buddha said to Śāriputra: ‘Just so! Just so! If you are glad to speak further, then speak.’
‘World-Honored One! Suppose a person wishes to see the great sea and sets out toward it; along the way he no longer sees the mark of trees, no longer sees the mark of mountains; though this person has not yet seen the great sea, he knows that the great sea is not far. Why? Because where the great sea is, the land is level, without the mark of trees, without the mark of mountains. Thus, World-Honored One! When a bodhisattva-mahāsattva hears this very deep prajñāpāramitā, and receives and upholds it, up to rightly recollecting it, although he has not yet received before the Buddha the prediction of a number of kalpas—whether a hundred kalpas, a thousand kalpas, ten thousand kalpas, or a hundred thousand myriad koṭi of kalpas—this bodhisattva knows for himself that it is not long before he is near to receiving the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. Why? Because I have been able to hear this very deep prajñāpāramitā, and receive and uphold it, read it, recite it, up to rightly recollecting it.
‘World-Honored One! Suppose that in early spring the old leaves of the trees have already fallen; know that it is not long before new leaves, flowers, and fruit appear on these trees. Why? Because the prior signs of these trees are seen, one knows that now before long leaves will grow, flowers will open, and fruit will form; at that time the people of Jambudvīpa, seeing the prior signs of the trees, all greatly rejoice. World-Honored One! When a bodhisattva-mahāsattva is able to hear this very deep prajñāpāramitā, and receives and upholds it, reads it, recites it, up to rightly recollecting it and practising as it is taught, know that this bodhisattva's roots of goodness are accomplished and that he has made offerings to many buddhas. This bodhisattva ought to give rise to this thought—followed by the roots of goodness of former lives, I am heading toward anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi; by these causes and conditions I am able to see and able to hear this very deep prajñāpāramitā, and receive and uphold it, read it, recite it, up to rightly recollecting it and practising as it is taught. The gods in this assembly who have seen the Buddha rejoice and leap for joy, and give rise to this thought, saying: formerly the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas also had such prior signs of the prediction; now this bodhisattva-mahāsattva too will receive the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi before long.
‘World-Honored One! Suppose a woman is with child: her body is burdened and heavy, walking is not easy, sitting and rising are not at ease, her sleep, food, and drink grow less, she does not delight in speaking, and she wearies of her former habits and likings, because she is bearing pain; another woman, seeing these prior signs of hers, knows that the birth is not long off. The bodhisattva-mahāsattva is also like this: having planted roots of goodness, made offerings to many buddhas, long practised the six perfections, and kept company with good friends, his roots of goodness accomplished, he is able to hear the very deep prajñāpāramitā, and receives and upholds it, reads it, recites it, up to rightly recollecting it and practising as it is taught; the bodhisattvas also know that it is not long before this bodhisattva-mahāsattva gains the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi.’
The Buddha said to Śāriputra: ‘Excellent! Excellent! What you are glad to speak is all the Buddha's power.’
At that time Subhūti addressed the Buddha: ‘Rare, World-Honored One! The tathāgatas, arhats, samyaksaṃbuddhas (the Tathāgata, the one worthy of offerings, the rightly and universally knowing one) entrust well the affairs of the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas!’
The Buddha said to Subhūti: ‘These bodhisattva-mahāsattvas arouse the mind of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, cause many beings to gain peace, cause immeasurable beings to gain happiness, for the sake of pitying, bringing peace and happiness to, and abundantly benefiting gods and humans. When these bodhisattvas practise the bodhisattva path, they gather in immeasurable hundreds of thousands of beings by four things, namely giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour; and they also bring beings to accomplishment by the ten wholesome paths. He himself practises the first dhyāna and also teaches others to practise the first dhyāna; and so on up to: he himself practises the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception and also teaches others to practise, up to the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception. He himself practises dānapāramitā and also teaches others to practise dānapāramitā; he himself practises śīlapāramitā and also teaches others to practise śīlapāramitā; he himself practises kṣāntipāramitā and also teaches others to practise kṣāntipāramitā; he himself practises vīryapāramitā and also teaches others to practise vīryapāramitā; he himself practises dhyānapāramitā and also teaches others to practise dhyānapāramitā; he himself practises prajñāpāramitā and also teaches others to practise prajñāpāramitā. This bodhisattva, having gained prajñāpāramitā, by the power of skilful means teaches beings and causes them to attain the fruit of srota-āpanna, while he himself does not realise it within; he teaches beings and causes them to attain the fruit of sakṛdāgāmin, the fruit of anāgāmin, and the fruit of arhatship, while he himself does not realise them within; he teaches beings and causes them to attain the pratyekabuddha path, while he himself does not realise it within. He himself practises the six perfections, and also teaches immeasurable hundreds of thousands of myriads of bodhisattvas to practise the six perfections. He himself abides on the ground of the avaivartika, and also teaches others to abide on the ground of the avaivartika. He himself purifies buddha-worlds, and also teaches others to purify buddha-worlds. He himself brings beings to accomplishment, and also teaches others to bring beings to accomplishment. He himself gains the supernormal powers of a bodhisattva, and also teaches others to gain the supernormal powers of a bodhisattva. He himself purifies the gates of dhāraṇī, and also teaches others to purify the gates of dhāraṇī. He himself is complete in the eloquence of delighting in speech, and also teaches others to be complete in the eloquence of delighting in speech. He himself accomplishes the form he receives, and also teaches others to accomplish the form they receive. He himself accomplishes the thirty-two marks, and also teaches others to accomplish the thirty-two marks. He himself accomplishes the ground of the youthful state, and also teaches others to accomplish the ground of the youthful state. He himself accomplishes the ten powers of the Buddha, and also teaches others to accomplish the ten powers of the Buddha. He himself practises the four fearlessnesses, and also teaches others to practise the four fearlessnesses. He himself practises the eighteen unshared dharmas, and also teaches others to practise the eighteen unshared dharmas. He himself practises great loving-kindness and great compassion, and also teaches others to practise great loving-kindness and great compassion. He himself gains omniscience of all kinds, and also teaches others to gain omniscience of all kinds. He himself is free of all fetters together with the residual habits, and also teaches others to be free of all fetters together with the residual habits. He himself turns the wheel of the Dharma, and also teaches others to turn the wheel of the Dharma.’
What follows is the treatise's explanation.
Treatise ③: Explaining the Simile of the Fish That Has Swallowed the Hook; the Four Comparisons Beginning with the Dangerous Road Matched and Explained; the Meaning of Bringing Peace to Many Beings; the Four Means of Gathering Explained at Length; Practising Oneself and Teaching Others, up to Turning the Wheel of the Dharma
The treatise-author explains:
At that time Śakra asked Śāriputra: ‘Is there a bodhisattva not yet having received the prediction who hears this very deep prajñā and is not startled, not terrified?’
Śāriputra said: ‘There is no one who, not yet having received the prediction, hears prajñā and can give rise to faith. If at times one truly can give rise to faith, know that he is close to receiving the prediction; after seeing no more than one buddha or two buddhas more, he will receive the prediction.’
The Buddha approved Śāriputra's words.
Śāriputra, hearing the Buddha approve what he had said, rejoiced in his mind; and further wishing to make this matter clear and distinct, he spoke similes, saying: ‘The mind in a dream is covered by sleep, and is not what the true mind does; if good men and good women in a dream arouse intent and practise the six perfections, up to sitting at the seat of awakening, know that though these people's merit is slight, they are already near to receiving the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. How much more a bodhisattva-mahāsattva who, while awake, with a true mind arouses anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi and practises the six perfections—how could he not be near to receiving the prediction! World-Honored One! If a person, coming and going within birth and death in the six destinies, is at times able to hear prajñāpāramitā, and receives and upholds it, reads it, recites it, and rightly recollects it, one knows for certain that this person will before long gain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi.’
It is like a fish that has swallowed the hook: though it still plays in the pond, know that it will be pulled out of the water before long; the practitioner is also like this: deeply believing in and delighting in prajñāpāramitā, he will not long abide in birth and death.
Here Śāriputra himself states how the simile matches the Dharma—
‘If a person wishes to cross a dangerous road’: the ‘dangerous road’ is the world. ‘A hundred yojanas’ is the desire realm, ‘two hundred yojanas’ is the form realm, ‘three hundred yojanas’ is the formless realm, ‘four hundred yojanas’ is the path of the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas.
Furthermore, ‘four hundred yojanas’ is the desire realm, ‘three hundred yojanas’ is the form realm, ‘two hundred yojanas’ is the formless realm, ‘a hundred yojanas’ is the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas.
The one who ‘wishes to get out’ is the person who believes, receives, and practises prajñāpāramitā. ‘First seeing the signs of dharmas’ is seeing great bodhisattvas abandon worldly pleasures of desire and with a deep mind love and delight in prajñāpāramitā. ‘Boundary marks’ is discriminating the dharmas—this is the dharma of the śrāvakas, this is the dharma of the pratyekabuddhas, this is the dharma of the Great Vehicle; thus, small benefit is the śrāvaka, great benefit is the bodhisattva; the realm of Māra is birth and death, the realm of the Buddha is prajñāpāramitā, the place of the deathless where the Dharma has the taste of ambrosia. ‘Gardens’ is the Dharma-joy of dhyāna and concentration, wisdom, and the like that accord with the Buddha path. In this way there are the marks of immeasurable wholesome dharmas. The ‘village’ is the compliant acceptance of dharmas, the ‘town’ is the acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas, the ‘city’ is anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. ‘Gaining peace’ is the bodhisattva hearing this Dharma, reflecting on it, weighing it, and practising: ‘I have gained this Dharma and my mind is at peace; I shall attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi.’ The ‘bandits’ are the sixty-two wrong views beginning with the view of self. The ‘evil insects’ are craving, hatred, and the other afflictions. ‘Not fearing bandits’ is that humans cannot find an opening against him. ‘Not fearing evil insects’ is that non-humans cannot find an opening against him. ‘Not fearing hunger’ is not fearing being unable to gain the true wisdom of the noble ones. ‘Not fearing thirst’ is not fearing being unable to gain the taste of the Dharma-joy of dhyāna and concentration, liberation, and the like.
Here the causes and conditions are stated by himself: ‘A bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has gained the prior signs will before long attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi.’
‘Not fearing falling into the evil destinies and dying of hunger’ is not fearing falling to the ground of the śrāvakas or the pratyekabuddhas.
The Buddha approved his simile, which uses a coarse and evident matter to illustrate a subtle principle, and uses the worldly to illustrate the world-transcending.
The remaining three similes should likewise be explained in the same way as above.
The ‘water of the great sea’ is the unsurpassed path; the ‘level ground without trees and without mountains’ is the scrolls of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra and the like.
The ‘fruit of the tree’ is the unsurpassed path, the ‘flowers of the tree’ are the ground of the avaivartika; ‘in springtime the old leaves fall and new leaves grow again’ is that the afflictions, wrong views, doubts, and the like are eliminated, and one is able to gain the scrolls of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra and the like.
The ‘woman’ is the practitioner, the ‘body she carries’ is the unsurpassed path, the ‘signs of approaching birth’ are the bodhisattva's long training in prajñāpāramitā; ‘wearying of her former habits and likings’ is being weary of the worldly pleasures of sexual desire and no longer delighting in or craving them.
The Buddha praised what he had said: ‘Excellent’!
At that time Subhūti, hearing the Buddha approve what Śāriputra had said and praise him as excellent, and knowing that the Buddha's mind deeply cherished and was mindful of these bodhisattvas, therefore addressed the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! It is most rare! You entrust well the affairs of the bodhisattvas.’ ‘The affairs of the bodhisattvas’ are the path of emptiness and the path of merit; it is also as the Buddha, having explained them by all kinds of general marks and specific marks, entrusted them to Ānanda, Maitreya, and others, so that after he entered nirvāṇa without remainder they would faithfully carry them out themselves and teach them to others, benefiting beings, without error or mistake!
The Buddha states the causes and conditions of entrusting well: the bodhisattvas arouse the mind of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi.
‘Causing many beings to gain peace’—among all beings, immeasurable, boundless, asaṃkhyeya, which no one but the Buddha can reckon and know, those who gain benefit from the Buddha cannot be counted, and so it is called ‘many’. ‘Peace’ is this: beings cling to permanence, and he teaches them impermanence; those who cling to happiness he teaches suffering; those who cling to the real he teaches emptiness; those who cling to self he teaches non-self—this is called peace. Ordinary people hearing these, although at the time they do not delight in them, after a long, long time eliminate the afflictions and then gain the happiness of peace; it is like taking bitter medicine: though it is bitter at the time, afterward one is able to be rid of illness. ‘Causing immeasurable beings to gain happiness’—when the bodhisattva seeks prajñāpāramitā and has not yet accomplished it, he benefits beings with the happiness of this life and of later lives, as the Bodhisattva Jātaka Sūtra says. If he has gained prajñāpāramitā and has already cut off the afflictions, he benefits beings with both worldly happiness and world-transcending happiness; when he attains the unsurpassed path, he benefits beings only with world-transcending happiness. ‘Bringing peace and happiness and abundantly benefiting’ is bringing peace and happiness and abundantly benefiting solely with a mind of pity. Abundantly means much benefiting gods and humans; in the other destinies the abundant benefit is little, and so they are not mentioned.
‘The matter of benefiting’ is the four means of gathering. Beings are gathered in by the two kinds, the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma. ‘Kind speech’ is of two kinds: first, kind speech that follows their minds; second, explaining for them according to the dharma they love. This bodhisattva, when he has not yet attained the path, pities beings, himself breaks down his pride, and speaks the Dharma according to their minds. If he has attained the path, he explains for them according to the dharma by which they ought to be delivered: for a rich man of haughty mind and lofty spirit, he praises giving, because this person can gain the benefit of others' wealth, fame, and merit; if he were to praise keeping morality and censure breaking morality for him, the man would not be glad in his heart—in this way, he speaks the Dharma according to what is fitting. ‘Beneficial action’ is also of two kinds: first, speaking the Dharma for the sake of benefit in this life and benefit in later lives, making a living in accord with the Dharma and diligently cultivating beneficial matters; second, teaching those who do not yet believe to believe, causing those who break morality to keep morality, causing those who have heard little to hear much, causing those who do not give to give, and teaching the deluded with wisdom—in this way, benefiting beings with wholesome dharmas. ‘Shared endeavour’ is this: the bodhisattva, teaching and transforming beings, causes them to practise wholesome dharmas and himself carries out the matter together with them; the bodhisattva is of wholesome mind, beings are of evil mind, and he can transform their evil and make it the same as his own goodness.
This bodhisattva gathers in beings by the four means of gathering and causes them to abide in the ten wholesome paths; this is the broad explanation of the meaning of the four means of gathering. Of the two gifts, the gift of Dharma is taken. Speaking the Dharma according to what they delight in is foremost within kind speech; beings love and cherish their lives, and causing them to practise the ten wholesome paths, they gain long life. Beneficial action: among the benefits of all precious things, the benefit of the Dharma is most excellent; this is beneficial action. Within shared endeavour, practising wholesome dharmas together is the most excellent; this bodhisattva himself practises the ten wholesome paths and also uses them to teach people.
Someone says: The later passage, himself practising the ten wholesome paths and so on, is precisely the meaning of the fourth, shared endeavour; therefore it says: ‘He himself practises the ten wholesome paths and also teaches people to practise them.’
‘He himself practises the first dhyāna and also teaches others to practise it’—the first dhyāna and the rest are alike in being free of desire and alike in keeping morality, and so they are called gathering one another in; because they gather one another in, gradually he can deliver them by the dharmas of the three vehicles. And so on up to the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception, likewise. He himself practises the six perfections, and also uses them to teach others.
By means of prajñā he causes beings to gain a share of prajñā, namely attaining srota-āpanna and the rest; by the power of skilful means he himself does not realise it. Because the power of this person's merit and wisdom increases, he can teach immeasurable asaṃkhyeya bodhisattvas and cause them to abide in the six perfections. He himself abides on the ground of the avaivartika and so on, and also uses it to teach others; up to: he himself turns the wheel of the Dharma, and also teaches others to turn the wheel of the Dharma.
Therefore it is because of a mind of kindness and compassion that I entrust well the affairs of these bodhisattvas, not because of loving attachment.
The above is Fascicle Sixty-Six of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa.
歎信行品之上:聞般若能信者宿植德本;禮般若即禮一切智;不住不習;受記先相四譬喻;善付菩薩事
在問什麼
品題「歎信行」,歎的是信行之人。之上一單元從帝釋一念開卷:若人得以般若「經耳」聽聞,這人已於前世佛所作功德、與善知識相隨——聞尚且如此,何況受持讀誦如說行!舍利弗接著把信毀兩途一齊追到先世:能聞不驚不怖者「如阿鞞跋致」,譏毀者前世亦曾譏毀;帝釋因此發言「我禮般若波羅蜜!禮般若波羅蜜,是禮一切智」,佛印可——諸佛一切智皆從般若生,欲住一切智乃至總攝比丘僧,當習行般若。由此帝釋進問行門:云何住、云何習行?佛答以一路「不住」:不住色中為習行般若,乃至不住十八不共法為習行十八不共法,不習色是名習色,因緣是三世色不可得。舍利弗三讚甚深、難測、無量,佛皆以色等諸法回應,又翻進一層:不行色甚深,方為行般若;因此甚深法不應在新發意前說,毀呰不信者種三惡道業。帝釋再問:未受記者頗有聞而不驚不怖者不?答:有,是人受記不久——舍利弗先舉夢中行六度尚近菩提,何況覺時;復連說四喻作證:過險道見放牧疆界園林知城邑不遠;趣大海見平地無樹山知海不遠;初春陳葉落知華果將出;母人懷妊見先相知產生不久。末後須菩提讚「善付菩薩事」,佛廣說菩薩四攝十善、自行教他乃至轉法輪。信從何來、信者何相、云何而行、行者何驗——之上四層,正是歎信行三字的展開。
逐段解明
一、帝釋念聞般若經耳者宿植德本。 開卷釋提桓因作是念:若善男子善女人「得聞般若波羅蜜經耳者,是人於前世佛作功德,與善知識相隨」,何況受持、親近、讀、誦、正憶念、如說行!當知是人多親近諸佛,能聽、受、如說行、能問、能答;於前世多供養親近諸佛故,聞是深般若「不驚、不怖、不畏」;亦於無量億劫行六波羅蜜。一念之中三個「當知」,把今日之聞逆推到宿世之行——聞法非偶然事,經耳一句已是宿因的現行。
二、舍利弗說信毀二途皆從先世。 舍利弗白佛:聞深般若不驚不怖、聞已受持如說習行者,「當知是善男子、善女人如阿鞞跋致菩薩摩訶薩」;般若甚深,若先世不久行六波羅蜜,「終不能信解深般若波羅蜜」。反之,今世呰毀者「當知是人前世亦呰毀深般若波羅蜜」——其聞法時無信無樂、心不清淨,正因先世不問不難諸佛及弟子:云何行六波羅蜜、修內空乃至無法有法空、四念處乃至八聖道分、佛十力乃至十八不共法。信與毀各有來歷,兩條線索都不始於今生。
三、帝釋述不信之由——我禮般若,是禮一切智。 帝釋語舍利弗:這深般若,若人不久行六波羅蜜、不行內空乃至無法有法空、不行四禪四無量心四無色定、不行四念處乃至八聖道分、不行佛十力乃至十八不共法——「如是人不信解是深般若波羅蜜,有何可怪!」不信不是般若之咎,是行力未充之常態。隨即轉出本品第一句禮讚:「大德舍利弗!我禮般若波羅蜜!禮般若波羅蜜,是禮一切智。」由解不信之由,翻成能信之禮。
四、佛印可——一切智即是般若;欲得諸果當習行般若。 佛告帝釋:「如是!如是!憍尸迦!禮般若波羅蜜,是禮一切智。」因緣是「諸佛一切智皆從般若波羅蜜生,一切智即是般若波羅蜜」。故欲住一切智,當住般若;欲生道種智、斷一切諸結及習、轉法輪,當習行般若;欲得須陀洹果乃至阿羅漢果、辟支佛道,欲教眾生得諸果乃至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,欲總攝比丘僧,皆當習行般若。三乘果證、自行化他、僧團攝持,一路收歸習行般若一句——般若是諸果之母,禮之即禮其源。
五、論釋帝釋發心之由——乾毳濕毳喻。 論主釋:帝釋是諸天主,「利根、智勝、信佛法故,倍復增益;如火得風,愈更熾盛」。聞須菩提種種因緣讚般若、佛以深理成其讚,故發希有心:因先世供養佛、緣今世善知識,聞般若能信;是人於無量阿僧祇劫行六波羅蜜等功德,故雖未得阿鞞跋致地,於深法中不疑不悔。喻曰:「譬如新劈乾毳,隨風東西;濕毳緤緻,則不可動。」新發意菩薩福淺隨他語,如乾毛隨風;久修福德不隨他語,如濕毛緊緻不動——信力之堅脆,全看積集之厚薄。
六、舍利弗白佛——未入菩薩位而如阿鞞跋致無異。 帝釋思惟念般若有無量功德時,舍利弗知帝釋所念,而白佛言:善男子善女人「雖未入菩薩位,能信受深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖,如說修行」,是人以大福德、智慧、信力故,「當知如阿鞞跋致無異」。位次未至而信行已具,論主特誌舍利弗代眾發此一讚——信力所齊,可以越位而許,這正是本品歎信行的第一重歎處。
七、空中種殖與尺蠖喻——無所依止而能捨,是事希有。 論主釋佛自說因緣:般若甚深,「無相可取、可信、可受;若能信受,是為希有」,如人空中種殖,是為甚難。凡夫得勝法則捨本事——得禪定樂捨五欲樂,乃至依有頂處捨無所有處功德——「不能無所依止而有所捨」。如尺蠖尋條,安前足進後足,盡樹端更無所依止,還歸本處。菩薩未得道,於般若「無所依止,而能修福德、捨五欲,是事希有」!所以能爾,因緣仍是先世信受、久行六度、大集諸福德。
八、毀呰亦從久習;墮獄罪畢何緣復聞般若三說。 論主釋反面:「與信相違,則毀呰般若波羅蜜。如厚福德者,從久積集;不信毀呰者,亦從久習。」問曰:先世毀呰誹謗應墮地獄,何緣復得聞般若?答有三說:一說是人墮地獄罪畢,還來毀呰,不說次後身;一說作業積集厚重則能與果報,是人前世雖不信而積業未厚,未得果報,「以餘福德故生人中,續復不信」;一說五逆罪次後身必受,餘罪不爾,或次後身、或久後身。誹謗有報而聞法有緣,三說並存以會通之——論主誌錄眾解,不強斷其一。
九、五逆次後身必受說;帝釋結不信不足怪。 復次有人言:「五逆罪,次後身必受;餘罪不爾,或次後身、或久後身。」謗法之罪不在五逆定業之列,故受報有遲速,遲報者中間猶得聞法。爾時帝釋語舍利弗:般若「畢竟空、無所有故甚深」,菩薩不久行功德,則「著心堅固、信力微弱」,不信般若乃至一切智,何足怪?著心與信力成反比——著堅則信弱,這是不信的病理,也是修信的下手處。
十、帝釋發禮般若之言——禮一切智即禮三世十方諸佛。 帝釋思惟籌量:「信般若波羅蜜福德無量,不信者得罪深重。」深愛敬般若故發言:我當禮是般若!何以故?「禮般若波羅蜜,則為禮一切智;禮一切智者,則禮三世十方諸佛。」爾時佛可其言,復說讚般若因緣:諸佛一切智慧皆從般若中生,故言欲住一切智中乃至總攝比丘僧,當習行般若。禮之所及層層上推——般若、一切智、三世十方諸佛,三而一貫,禮般若處即遍禮諸佛。
十一、帝釋問行門——云何住、云何習行。 經②開卷,帝釋白佛:菩薩摩訶薩欲行般若時,「云何名住」般若波羅蜜、禪、毘梨耶、羼提、尸羅、檀波羅蜜?云何住內空乃至無法有法空、四禪四無量心四無色定五神通、四念處乃至八聖道分、佛十力乃至十八不共法?「云何習行」般若乃至檀波羅蜜、內空乃至十八不共法?上文已明當習行般若,此問把「當習」逼成「云何習」——從勸信轉入行門,是本單元經文的轉軸。
十二、佛答不住為習——不住色中為習行般若,不習色是名習色。 佛先讚善哉:「汝能樂問是事,皆是佛神力!」次正答:若菩薩「不住色中,為習行般若波羅蜜」,不住受想行識中亦然;眼耳鼻舌身意、色聲香味觸法、眼界乃至意識界亦如是。不住般若中為習般若,六波羅蜜一一皆然;內空乃至無法有法空、四禪乃至五神通、四念處乃至八聖道分、佛十力乃至十八不共法皆然。因緣是「不得色可住可習處」。復翻進一層:「菩薩摩訶薩不習色,若不習色,是名習色」——三世推求,「色前際不可得、中際不可得、後際不可得」。不住正是習,不習正是習,行門至此無處可捉而處處是行。
十三、舍利弗初讚甚深難測——色如甚深故般若甚深。 舍利弗白佛:「是般若波羅蜜甚深!」佛言:「色如甚深故,般若波羅蜜甚深」,受想行識如甚深故亦然,乃至十八不共法亦如是。舍利弗復言:「是般若波羅蜜難可測量!」般若之深不是離法別有一深,是就色等諸法之「如」而深——如者諸法實相,眼見之色不深,色之如乃深。讚辭落在般若,佛一一轉指諸法,深不在能觀而在所觀之實相。
十四、難測無量二讚——色難測故般若難測,色無量故般若無量。 佛答難測之讚:「色難可測量故,般若波羅蜜難可測量」,受想行識乃至十八不共法難可測量故亦然。舍利弗三讚:「世尊!是般若波羅蜜無量!」佛言:「色無量故,般若波羅蜜無量」,乃至十八不共法無量故亦然。甚深、難測、無量三讚一律同構:般若之德即諸法之德,法法皆如故法法皆深——三番問答疊唱,正教人於當前一色一法上見般若,不向法外覓深。
十五、不行甚深為行般若——甚深相為非色。 佛告舍利弗:菩薩行般若時,「不行色甚深,為行般若波羅蜜」,乃至不行十八不共法甚深亦然。何以故?「色甚深相為非色」——甚深相若立為色之定相,那已不是色的實相。難測量、無量二重同例:不行色難測量、不行色無量,為行般若;難測量相、無量相皆為非色乃至非十八不共法。前番三讚是如實讚,此番三遮是勘取相:讚得而執其讚,深相轉成新縛,故連甚深之相亦不行。
十六、不應在新發意前說——當在阿鞞跋致前說。 舍利弗白佛:般若甚深,「甚深相難見、難解、不可思量,不應在新發意菩薩前說」。何以故?新發意菩薩聞是甚深般若,「或當驚怖,心生疑悔,不信、不行」。當在阿鞞跋致菩薩前說,是菩薩聞之「不驚、不怖,心不疑悔,則能信行」。法無揀擇而聞有堪與不堪,說法者不可不擇機——甚深之法逢淺信之機,非但無益,反成損緣,下文即明其過。
十七、新發意前說之過——毀呰不信種三惡道業。 帝釋問舍利弗:若在新發意菩薩前說是深般若,「有何等過」?舍利弗報言:新發意菩薩聞之或當驚怖、呰毀、不信,「是新發意菩薩或有是處」;若毀呰不信,「種三惡道業;是業因緣故,久久難得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」。過不在聞而在毀——聞而生毀,一語謗法,三途業成,菩提反遠。護新學者之信根,正是護其菩提之路,非祕法不與。
十八、論釋帝釋問與佛讚善哉之由。 論主釋曰:帝釋從佛聞讚般若具足故,今問佛:菩薩云何住般若,從禪波羅蜜乃至十八不共法?佛讚言善哉善哉者,「以釋提桓因諸天中主,言必可信。問是事,斷大眾疑,通達無礙,能大利益」。復次,佛以帝釋「能捨上妙五欲、七寶、宮殿,能問佛賢聖所行事」,是故言善哉。一讚兩由:就聞者言,天主發問則眾疑同斷;就問者言,捨欲問道其心可貴——善哉不是客套,是就機就心兩面印可。
十九、佛神力故能問;不住色故能習行——凡夫著色失道。 論主釋「以佛神力故,汝能樂問此事」:會中更有上妙諸天觀佛神德無量,今帝釋能於大眾中諮問佛事,故是佛威神;如《持心經》說:「佛光明入身中,能問佛事。」又釋佛答:菩薩「見色無常、苦等過罪,故不住色;若不住色,即是能習行般若波羅蜜」。凡夫人「見色著色故,起顛倒煩惱」,失是般若道。以是故,不住者能習行般若;五眾、十二入、十八界亦如是。不住之義先從觀過立——見過故不住,不住故不失。
二十、六波羅蜜各習其行之問——不著則清淨習。 問曰:何以故不住六波羅蜜等各各自習其行?答曰:「是六波羅蜜等皆是善法行法」,以是故說不住六度等,言各習其行;眾、界、入,為習行般若波羅蜜。若於是法中不著,則斷愛著;「斷愛著故,色等諸法中清淨習」。經文措辭有別:於六度言不住某度為習某度,於蘊界入言不住為習行般若——善法可各就其行而習,蘊界入唯堪作般若之觀境;而其樞紐同是一個不著,不著故習得清淨。
廿一、不住不習因緣——習色名取色相。 論主釋:此中說不住因緣,「所謂不得色等法住處,不得色等法習處」。復次,佛以此事難解,更說因緣:「不習色」者,菩薩見色過故不住色中,不住故不習。「習色」名取色相,若常、若無常等。復次,菩薩常行善法、正語正業等,「積習純厚」,故名習色。習之一字兩訓:取相分別之習是所遮,善法積習之習是所成——遮取相之習,正為成清淨之習,勿把不習誤讀成廢行。
廿二、三世色不可得——觀諸法散壞不取相,是名能習實相。 論主釋不習之深義:今菩薩欲行般若故,「散壞是色,不習」。所以者何?「過去色已滅、未來色未有故不可習;現在色生時即滅故不住」,若住一念尚無習,何況念念滅?故說不習色因緣:「三世色不可得。」乃至十八不共法亦如是。「若能如是觀諸法散壞,不取相」,是名「能習色等諸法實相」。不習到底,翻成能習——所習非色相而是色之實相,經文「若不習色,是名習色」的關節,正在這一轉。
廿三、雨渧大海喻——分別色入如實故甚深。 論主釋舍利弗之讚:舍利弗從佛聞是義,「歡喜,深入空智」,白佛般若甚深;佛然可,成其所讚:色等諸法如故甚深。佛語:「不但眼見色甚深,以般若波羅蜜分別色入如實故甚深。」喻曰:「如雨渧渧,不名甚深;和合眾流,入於大海,乃名甚深。」一滴之水不成其深,眾流歸海乃見深廣;一色之相不足言深,以般若分別而入如實,色始顯其深——深在入處,不在色面。
廿四、慧眼觀深;甚深故無量——籌量有過罪。 論主續釋:「天眼、肉眼,見淺而不深;若以慧眼觀,則深不可測。」甚深故難可測量,「唯有諸佛乃盡其底」。甚深不可測量,故名無量——「無有智慧能取色等實相,若常、若無常,籌量有過罪故」。是時舍利弗及諸聽者作是念:般若不可測量、無有量,「菩薩當云何行」?三讚之義至此收攏:深、難測、無量是一義的三進,而聽眾之念自然轉出行門之問——既無量,從何下手?
廿五、水深淺無定喻——為眾生利鈍分別說深淺。 佛知其念,告舍利弗:菩薩「若行色等甚深者,則為失般若波羅蜜;若不行色甚深,是為得般若波羅蜜」。論主釋:凡夫鈍根故言甚深,一心、福德、利根者為非甚深。「譬如水深淺無定,若於小兒則深,長者則淺」;乃至大海,於人則深,於羅睺阿修羅王則淺。於凡夫、新發意、懈怠者為甚深,於久積德阿鞞跋致則淺;「諸佛如羅睺阿修羅王,於一切法無有深者,得無礙解脫故」。深淺不在法上,在根器上——為眾生及時節、利鈍、初久、懈怠精進故,分別說深淺。
廿六、甚深相為非色;舍利弗何以復說甚深之問。 論主引佛自說因緣:「色等法甚深相為非色。何以故?怖畏、心沒、疑悔故,以色為甚深,色相則無深。」深是心上的怖畏疑悔投給法的,色相本身無深可立。舍利弗白佛:般若甚深,甚深相難見難解。問曰:上說「菩薩不行甚深,為行般若波羅蜜」,今舍利弗何以復說甚深?既遮甚深之行,何以口中又讚甚深——這一問替讀者把經文表面的矛盾挑明,下段即解。
廿七、為人故說甚深——深水勿使小兒渡喻。 答曰:「舍利弗非定心說甚深,得佛意趣,為人故說甚深。」是故此中說:不應於新發意菩薩前說是般若,新學菩薩聞是深智慧「則心沒」;應當在阿鞞跋致菩薩前說,阿鞞跋致智慧深故,「信而不沒」。喻曰:「譬如深水,不應使小兒渡,應教大人令渡。」說深非取深相,是就機設教之言——自心不立定相,為人不得不分深淺,兩不相妨。
廿八、新發意之過細釋——斷滅之懼與不受之窘。 論主釋帝釋問有何等過:舍利弗答,新發意者則不信、心沒,「心沒故生疑悔、怖畏」——其進退之窘是:「若受一切空法,我云何當墮斷滅中?若不受者,佛所說法,何可不受!」是故怖畏、生疑悔。若心定,則生惡邪毀呰;毀呰果報,如〈地獄品〉中說,此中略說:「種三惡道業因緣,久久難得無上道。」怖畏尚是輕過,定心起毀乃成重業——護機之慎,正在毀謗一關。
廿九、未受記者聞而能信——受記不過一佛兩佛。 經③開卷,帝釋問舍利弗:「頗有未受記菩薩摩訶薩聞是深般若波羅蜜不驚、不怖者不?」舍利弗言:有!若菩薩聞是深般若不驚不怖,「當知是菩薩,受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久,不過一佛、兩佛」。上文說信從宿因來,此處翻出信的預記義:能信不驚,即是受記在即之相——信不只是果上之驗,更是因上之券。
卅、佛印可;舍利弗說夢喻——夢中行六度尚近菩提。 佛告舍利弗:如是如是!是菩薩「久發意、行六波羅蜜、多供養諸佛」,聞是深般若不驚不怖不畏,聞即受持如所說行。舍利弗白佛欲說譬喻:求菩薩道者「夢中」修行般若、入禪定、勤精進、具足忍辱、守護於戒、行布施,修行內空外空乃至坐於道場,當知是人近阿耨多羅三藐三菩提;「何況」覺時修行六度,而不疾成菩提、坐於道場!善根成就得聞般若、受持乃至如說行者,當知久發意、種善根、多供養諸佛、與善知識相隨,「近受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記」,如阿鞞跋致於菩提不動轉。夢中之行尚爾,覺時之行可知——以輕況重,勢如破竹。
卅一、險道喻——見放牧疆界園林,知城邑聚落不遠。 舍利弗說第一喻:譬如人欲過「百由旬、若二百、三百、四百由旬曠野嶮道」,先見諸相:若放牧者、若壃界、若園林,故知近城、邑、聚落。是人見是相已作是念:如我所見相,當知城邑聚落不遠。「心得安隱,不畏賊難、惡蟲、飢渴。」險道未盡而先相已現,心即先安——喻的關目在先相二字:果雖未至,徵候可憑,下文法合處一一有配。
卅二、法合——得般若即是先相,不應畏墮二乘地。 舍利弗自合:菩薩亦如是,「若得是深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念,當知近受得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久」,當知是菩薩「不應畏墮聲聞、辟支佛地」。何者是先相?「是諸先相,所謂甚深般若波羅蜜,得聞、得見、得受乃至正憶念故。」得聞般若本身就是受記將至的徵候——行者於險道中所求的那個放牧疆界園林,就是手中這卷般若。
卅三、大海喻——平地無樹山,知海不遠。 佛言:汝復樂說者便說。舍利弗說第二喻:譬如人欲見大海,發心往趣,「不見樹相、不見山相」,雖未見大海,知大海不遠;何以故?「大海處平,無樹相、無山相故。」菩薩聞是深般若、受持乃至正憶念時,「雖未佛前受劫數之記」,若百劫、千劫、萬劫、百千萬億劫,是菩薩「自知近受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久」。前喻以有相為徵,此喻以無相為徵——樹山盡處即是海濱,諸相漸泯之處即近菩提,兩喻一正一反相補。
卅四、春樹喻——陳葉已墮,華果不久。 第三喻:譬如初春,「諸樹陳葉已墮,當知此樹新葉華果出在不久」;閻浮提人見樹先相,皆大歡喜。菩薩得聞深般若、受持讀誦乃至正憶念如說行,當知善根成就、多供養諸佛。是菩薩應作是念:「先世善根所追,趣阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」,以是因緣得見得聞是深般若。是中諸天子曾見佛者歡喜踊躍:「先諸菩薩摩訶薩亦有如是受記先相」,今是菩薩受記亦不久。舊葉之落即新榮之候——煩惱謝處善根發,旁觀的諸天亦能識此相,如見春信。
卅五、懷妊喻——見先相知產生不久。 第四喻:譬如母人懷妊,「身體苦重,行步不便,坐起不安,眠食轉少,不喜言語,厭本所習」,受苦痛故;有異母人見其先相,「當知產生不久」。菩薩亦如是:種善根、多供養諸佛、久行六波羅蜜、與善知識相隨,善根成就,得聞深般若、受持讀誦乃至正憶念如說行;「諸菩薩亦知是菩薩摩訶薩得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久」。四喻至此極親切——道果之孕已成,身相自變,識者一望而知;厭本所習一句,尤是行人氣象轉換之驗。
卅六、須菩提讚善付;佛廣說菩薩自行教他。 佛讚舍利弗:「善哉!善哉!汝所樂說,皆是佛力。」爾時須菩提白佛:「希有!世尊!諸多陀阿伽度、阿羅呵、三藐三佛陀善付諸菩薩摩訶薩事!」佛告須菩提:是諸菩薩發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心,「安隱多眾生,令無量眾生得樂,憐愍、安樂、饒益諸天人故」;行菩薩道時以四事攝無量百千眾生——「布施、愛語、利益、同事」,亦以十善道成就眾生;自行初禪乃至非有想非無想處、自行六波羅蜜,皆亦教他;得般若以方便力教眾生得須陀洹果乃至辟支佛道而「自於內不證」;自住阿鞞跋致地、淨佛世界、成就眾生、得菩薩神通、淨陀羅尼門、具足樂說辯才、受色成就、三十二相、童真地、佛十力、四無所畏、十八不共法、大慈大悲、一切種智、離一切結使及習,乃至「自轉法輪,亦教他人轉法輪」——一一皆自行而教他。
卅七、論釋未受記能信之問——吞鉤之魚喻起。 論主釋曰:帝釋問頗有未受記菩薩聞是深般若不驚不怖者不,舍利弗言:「無有不受記聞般若能信者。若或時能信者,當知垂欲受記,不過見一佛、二佛,便得受記。」佛可舍利弗語。舍利弗聞佛可其所說,心生歡喜,復欲分明了了是事故說譬喻:「夢中心為睡所覆故,非真心所作」;夢中發意行六度乃至坐道場,是人福德輕微,尚近受記,何況覺時實心發菩提、行六度而不近受記!若人往來六道生死中,或時得聞般若、受持讀誦正憶念,「必知是人不久得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」。
卅八、吞鉤之魚喻——深信樂般若,不久住生死。 論主自說一喻:「如吞鉤之魚,雖復遊戲池中,當知出在不久;行者亦如是,深信樂般若波羅蜜,不久住於生死。」魚已吞鉤,游戲如故而出水有期;行者一念深信般若,形跡仍在生死而超出已定。此喻補足四喻所未及的一層:先相不但可由外相認取,信樂之心本身即是那枚已吞之鉤——被般若鉤住的人,生死留他不住。
卅九、險道合譬——四百由旬二說。 論主釋險道喻之合法:『險道即是世間』。百由旬者是欲界,二百由旬是色界,三百由旬是無色界,四百由旬是聲聞辟支佛道;復次,四百由旬是欲界,三百由旬是色界,二百由旬是無色界,百由旬是聲聞辟支佛。兩配並列:前配以三界為近、二乘為遠,就出離之序言;後配以欲界為最遠,就難度之重言——欲界纏縛最厚故道里最長。論主兩存其說,正見譬喻活句不可死看。
四十、險道諸相一一合法——賊是邪見,惡蟲是煩惱。 論主續合:「欲出」者是信受行般若之人。「先見諸法相」者,見大菩薩捨世間欲樂、深心樂般若。「壃界」者分別諸法——聲聞法、辟支佛法、大乘法,小利是聲聞、大利是菩薩,「魔界是生死,佛界是般若波羅蜜、甘露法味不死之處」。「園林」者隨佛道禪定智慧等樂。「聚落」是柔順法忍,「邑」是無生法忍,「城」是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。「賊」者是我等六十二邪見,「惡蟲」者是愛恚等諸煩惱;不畏賊者人不得便,不畏惡蟲者非人不得便,「不畏飢」者不畏不能得聖人真智慧,「不畏渴」者不畏不能得禪定解脫等法樂味。逐相配法,忍位為程途之驛,菩提為所趣之城。
四十一、先相因緣結;不畏墮二乘;麁喻細。 論主結此喻:此中自說因緣——「菩薩摩訶薩得先相者,不久當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」「不畏墮惡道中、飢餓死」者,合法為「不畏墮聲聞、辟支佛地」——於菩薩道中,二乘之證反成中途之險,如行人之懼餓死道旁。「佛然可其喻,以麁喻細,以世間喻出世間。」喻與所喻本不齊等,取其髣髴而已;佛可之者,可其以世間常情引人入出世深理。
四十二、餘三喻合法——大海、樹華果、母人。 論主言:「餘三譬喻,亦應如上分別說。」略示其要:「大海水」是無上道,「平地無樹無山」是般若波羅蜜經卷等;「樹果」是無上道,「樹華」是阿鞞跋致地,「春時陳葉落,更生新葉」,是「諸煩惱邪見、疑等滅」,能得般若經卷等;「母人」是行者,「所任身」是無上道,「欲產相」是菩薩久習行般若,「厭本所習」是「患世間婬欲樂,不復喜著」。佛讚其所說善哉。三喻之合皆以般若經卷為現前之徵、無上道為所懷之實——先相之義一以貫之。
四十三、善付菩薩事——空道福德道,寄付阿難彌勒。 論主釋須菩提之讚:須菩提聞佛然舍利弗所說、讚其善哉,「知佛意深敬念是菩薩」,故白佛言:世尊甚為希有,善付菩薩事。「菩薩事」者,「空道,福德道」;亦如佛種種總相別相說,「以寄付阿難、彌勒等」,入無餘涅槃後,好自奉行教示,利益眾生,「無令謬錯」!付囑之事二道並舉——空道是慧命,福德道是資糧;佛滅之後法由人弘,善付二字裡有如來身後的深念。
四十四、安穩多眾生釋——著常教無常,如服苦藥。 論主釋佛說善付因緣:諸菩薩發阿耨多羅三藐三菩提心。「安穩多眾生」者:一切眾生無量無邊阿僧祇,除佛無能計知;從佛得利益者不可數故名多。「安穩」者:「眾生著常,教無常;著樂者,教苦;著實者,教空;著我者,教無我」——如是等名安穩。凡夫人聞是當時雖不喜樂,久久滅諸煩惱得安穩樂;「如服苦藥,當時雖苦,後得除患」。安穩不是順情之慰,是拔本之治——四教皆逆凡情而順實相,苦口正是安穩之所從來。
四十五、得樂饒益釋——三時利益之別。 論主釋「無量眾生得樂」:菩薩求般若未得成就時,「以今世、後世樂利益眾生」,如《菩薩本生經》說;若得般若、已斷諸煩惱,亦以世間樂、出世間樂利益眾生;「若得無上道時,但以出世間樂利益眾生」。「安樂、饒益」者,但以憐愍心故安樂饒益;「饒者,多利益天、人;餘道中饒益少故不說」。三階三樂:未得道則與世樂,得般若則世出世並施,成佛則純與出世樂——利他之品隨自證之位而轉深。
四十六、四攝法廣釋——愛語、利益各有二種,同事則同其所行。 論主釋「利益事」者所謂四攝法:以財施、法施二種攝取眾生。「愛語」有二種:「一者、隨意愛語,二者、隨其所愛法為說」——未得道時憐愍眾生、自破憍慢、隨意說法;得道則隨所應度法為說,如高心富人為讚布施,若為讚持戒毀呰破戒則心不喜樂,隨其所應而為說法。「利益」亦有二種:一者為今世利後世利說法,以法治生勤修利事;二者「未信教令信,破戒令持戒,寡識令多聞,不施者令布施,癡者教智慧」。「同事」者,教化眾生令行善法而同其所行——「菩薩善心,眾生惡心,能化其惡,令同己善」。四攝之要在隨機:語隨其愛,利隨其缺,事同其行。
四十七、四攝結成與自行教他之推展——善付以慈悲不以愛著。 論主結:菩薩以四種攝眾生令住十善道,是廣說四攝義。於二施中法施第一;隨其所樂而為說法,是愛語中第一;令行十善道則得久壽,於一切寶物利中「法利最勝」;同事中同行善法為勝。有人言:後自行十善等,是第四同義,故說自行十善亦教人行。「自行初禪,亦教他行」——初禪等「同離欲,同持戒,是故名相攝;相攝故,漸漸能以三乘法度」。因般若故令眾生得般若分,所謂得須陀洹等,「方便力故自不證」;教無量阿僧祇菩薩令住六波羅蜜,乃至自轉法輪亦教他轉法輪。末後歸結付囑之心:「是故我以慈悲心故善付是菩薩事,不以愛著故。」慈悲與愛著一字之判,正是善付之所以為善。
不要讀錯
不要把『信毀皆從先世』讀成宿命定論。經文說能信者宿植德本、毀呰者前世亦毀,是明因果相續之勢,不是說今生無可作為;論主釋處明言不信之由是「不久行功德,則著心堅固、信力微弱」——著心可破、功德可積,濕毳之緻正從一縷一縷積來。若讀成信根天定、毀者無救,則地獄罪畢復得聞般若之問答全成廢語。
不要把『不住不習』讀成廢修。佛言不住色中為習行般若、「若不習色,是名習色」,論主兩重分疏:所遮之習是「取色相,若常、若無常等」,所成之習是善法「積習純厚」與「能習色等諸法實相」——遮的是取相,不是遮六度萬行。經文於六波羅蜜正說「不住禪波羅蜜中,為習禪波羅蜜」,習字始終不曾放下。
不要把「不應在新發意菩薩前說」讀成般若有祕。不說之由是護其信根——聞深法而心沒生毀,「種三惡道業」,是為護人不為吝法;且論主明言舍利弗「非定心說甚深,得佛意趣,為人故說甚深」。深淺本無定相,如水於小兒深、於長者淺;就機說淺深與法體無深淺,兩句各有其位。
不要把四喻之驗讀成聞經即保證受記。四喻所驗的是「受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念、如說行」之人——每一喻的法合處都帶著這一串行持;論主吞鉤之喻亦說「深信樂般若波羅蜜」者不久住生死。經耳一聞是宿因之徵,受記之近則繫於聞後之行;把先相讀成足相,正是把徵候誤作果證的自負。
修行作用
以聞法自驗宿因,以行持自造來因。此單元教人一種回望:今日能聞般若而不驚不怖,即知先世曾問曾行;今日聞而心生牴牾,也不必自棄——著心堅固、信力微弱是病相不是判詞,六波羅蜜一事一事行去,乾毳自會變成濕毳。聞法之際的一念歡喜或一念疑悔,都是自家宿世功課的成績單,讀懂它,然後補課。
於一切修法上檢點住相。日用行布施、坐禪、誦讀,事相照作,但常自問:我是否住在此法之中——恃布施為我能、執禪定為我得?經文的尺度極簡:「不得色可住可習處」,凡覺得有個可安身的修行成績處,即是住;不住而行,行乃清淨。三世推求是現成的觀法:已作者滅、未作者無、正作者不停,於何處住?
驚怖現前時識取斷滅之疑。論主替新發意畫出心相:「若受一切空法,我云何當墮斷滅中?若不受者,佛所說法,何可不受!」聞空法而進退失據時,先認出這正是經中預記的關口,不必羞、不可毀——寧可存疑而勤行六度,莫以定心起毀;毀呰一語成業,久久難得無上道。
以先相自安,以厭習自驗。行道中途每有不知已至何處之惶惑,四喻教人認路標:於般若經卷能生歡喜受持、於世樂漸覺其淡(厭本所習)、於煩惱見其如陳葉之搖落——皆是城邑不遠之相,認得即「心得安隱」,不畏賊難惡蟲飢渴。又自行一法即教人一法,四攝隨機:語揀其所愛,利補其所缺,事同其所行——以慈悲不以愛著,是攝他亦是自淨。
承衍
之上一單元,三經三論,是歎信行品的立信之段。經①從帝釋一念立信之宿因——聞般若經耳者前世作功德,信毀二途皆從先世;帝釋禮般若而佛印可,禮般若即禮一切智,諸果諸德皆當習行般若。經②轉入行門——不住色中為習行般若,不習色是名習色,三世色不可得;甚深難測無量三讚而甚深相為非色,連深相亦不行;甚深法不應在新發意前說,護其信根即護其菩提。經③立信之驗——未受記而能信者受記不久,夢中行六度、險道先相、大海處平、春樹陳葉、母人懷妊,四喻加吞鉤之魚,皆明得聞般若即是受記先相;末後善付菩薩事,四攝十善、自行教他乃至轉法輪,以慈悲不以愛著。信有其因、有其行、有其驗、有其付——歎信行三字,之上已立其體。至於具足修行般若之相云何、不可思議之歎、留難魔事之防、諸佛佛眼見知念持經者、北方末法眾生之受記——本品之下單元繼此展開,此處不預。
Praise of Practising in Faith, First Part: Those Who Hear Prajñā and Can Have Faith Planted the Roots of Virtue Long Ago; To Worship Prajñā Is to Worship Omniscience; Not Abiding, Not Training; Four Similes for the Prior Signs of the Prediction; Entrusting Well the Affairs of the Bodhisattvas
What Is Being Asked
The chapter title is 「歎信行」 tr. "praise of practising in faith", and what it praises is the person who practises in faith. The First Part, a single unit, opens with one thought of Śakra: if a person gets to hear prajñā so that it 「經耳」 tr. "reaches the ears", this person has already made merit under the buddhas of former lives and kept company with good friends—if hearing is so, how much more receiving and upholding it, reading and reciting it, and practising as it is taught! Śāriputra then traces the two roads of faith and disparagement together back to former lives: one who can hear and is not startled or terrified is 「如阿鞞跋致」 tr. "like an avaivartika", and one who disparages also disparaged in a former life; Śakra therefore speaks out, 「我禮般若波羅蜜!禮般若波羅蜜,是禮一切智」 tr. "I worship prajñāpāramitā! To worship prajñāpāramitā is to worship omniscience", and the Buddha confirms it—the omniscience of the buddhas is all born from prajñā; one who wishes to abide in omniscience, and so on up to gathering together the whole bhikṣu Saṅgha, should train in prajñā. From here Śakra presses on to ask about the gate of practice: how does one abide, how does one train? The Buddha answers with a single road of 「不住」 tr. "not abiding": not abiding in form is training in prajñā, and so on up to not abiding in the eighteen unshared dharmas is training in the eighteen unshared dharmas; not training in form is called training in form, the reason being that form in the three times is unfindable. Śāriputra praises three times—very deep, hard to fathom, immeasurable—and each time the Buddha responds with form and all dharmas, and then turns one level further: not practising the depth of form is what practising prajñā is; therefore the very deep Dharma should not be spoken before those who have newly aroused the mind, and those who disparage it and do not believe plant the karma of the three evil destinies. Śakra asks again: among those who have not received the prediction, is there anyone who hears and is not startled or terrified? The answer: there is, and this person will receive the prediction before long—Śāriputra first points out that practising the six perfections in a dream is already near to awakening, how much more when awake; then gives four similes in a row as proof: one crossing a dangerous road who sees herdsmen, boundary marks, and gardens knows that the town is not far; one heading for the great sea who sees level ground without trees or mountains knows that the sea is not far; in early spring the old leaves fall, and one knows that flowers and fruit are about to come forth; a woman with child, when the prior signs are seen, is known to give birth before long. At the end Subhūti praises the 「善付菩薩事」 tr. "entrusting well of the affairs of the bodhisattvas", and the Buddha speaks at length of the bodhisattva's four means of gathering and ten wholesome paths, of practising himself and teaching others, and so on up to turning the wheel of the Dharma. Where faith comes from, what marks the one who has faith, how one practises, what verifies the one who practises—these four layers of the First Part are exactly the unfolding of the three Chinese characters rendered here as ‘praise of practising in faith’.
Passage by Passage
1. Śakra thinks that those whose ears prajñā reaches planted the roots of virtue long ago. At the opening Śakra Devānām Indra has this thought: if good men and good women 「得聞般若波羅蜜經耳者,是人於前世佛作功德,與善知識相隨」 tr. "get to hear prajñāpāramitā so that it reaches their ears, these people made merit under the buddhas of former lives and kept company with good friends", how much more those who receive and uphold it, draw near to it, read it, recite it, rightly recollect it, and practise as it is taught! Know that these people have drawn near to many buddhas, and can listen, receive, practise as it is taught, ask, and answer; because in former lives they made offerings to and drew near to many buddhas, on hearing this deep prajñā they are 「不驚、不怖、不畏」 tr. "not startled, not terrified, not afraid"; and for immeasurable koṭi of kalpas they have also practised the six perfections. Within a single thought there are three 「當知」 tr. "know that"s, reasoning back from today's hearing to the practice of former lives—hearing the Dharma is no accidental matter; the one phrase ‘reaching the ears’ is already the present working of a cause from former lives.
2. Śāriputra says that the two roads of faith and disparagement both come from former lives. Śāriputra says to the Buddha: of one who hears the deep prajñā and is not startled or terrified, and having heard receives and upholds it and trains as it is taught, 「當知是善男子、善女人如阿鞞跋致菩薩摩訶薩」 tr. "know that this good man or good woman is like an avaivartika bodhisattva-mahāsattva"; prajñā is very deep, and if in former lives one had not long practised the six perfections, one 「終不能信解深般若波羅蜜」 tr. "could never have faith in and understand the deep prajñāpāramitā". Conversely, of one who disparages it in this life, 「當知是人前世亦呰毀深般若波羅蜜」 tr. "know that this person in a former life also disparaged the deep prajñāpāramitā"—when such a person hears the Dharma there is no faith and no delight, and the mind is not pure, precisely because in former lives he did not ask and did not question the buddhas and their disciples: how does one practise the six perfections, cultivate inner emptiness and so on up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas, the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eight limbs of the noble path, the ten powers of the Buddha and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas? Faith and disparagement each have their history, and neither thread begins in this life.
3. Śakra states the reason for unbelief—I worship prajñā, and this is to worship omniscience. Śakra says to Śāriputra: as for this deep prajñā, if a person has not long practised the six perfections, does not practise inner emptiness and so on up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas, does not practise the four dhyānas, the four immeasurable minds, and the four formless absorptions, does not practise the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eight limbs of the noble path, does not practise the ten powers of the Buddha and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas—「如是人不信解是深般若波羅蜜,有何可怪!」 tr. "that such a person does not have faith in and understand this deep prajñāpāramitā—what is there to wonder at!" Unbelief is not the fault of prajñā; it is the ordinary state of one whose power of practice is not yet full. At once he turns out the first praise-worship of this chapter: 「大德舍利弗!我禮般若波羅蜜!禮般若波羅蜜,是禮一切智。」 tr. "Venerable One Śāriputra! I worship prajñāpāramitā! To worship prajñāpāramitā is to worship omniscience." From explaining the reason for unbelief, it turns into the worship of one who can have faith.
4. The Buddha confirms it—omniscience is prajñā; one who wishes to gain the fruits should train in prajñā. The Buddha tells Śakra: 「如是!如是!憍尸迦!禮般若波羅蜜,是禮一切智。」 tr. "Just so! Just so! Kauśika! To worship prajñāpāramitā is to worship omniscience." The causes and conditions are that 「諸佛一切智皆從般若波羅蜜生,一切智即是般若波羅蜜」 tr. "the omniscience of the buddhas is all born from prajñāpāramitā, and omniscience is prajñāpāramitā". Therefore one who wishes to abide in omniscience should abide in prajñā; one who wishes to give rise to knowledge of the kinds of paths, to cut off all fetters together with their residual habits, and to turn the wheel of the Dharma should train in prajñā; one who wishes to gain the fruit of srota-āpanna and so on up to the fruit of arhat and the path of the pratyekabuddha, who wishes to teach beings to gain the fruits and so on up to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, who wishes to gather together the whole bhikṣu Saṅgha—all should train in prajñā. The realisation of the fruits of the three vehicles, training in oneself and transforming others, holding the Saṅgha together—all of it is gathered back into the one phrase ‘practise prajñā’: prajñā is the mother of all the fruits, and to worship it is to worship their source.
5. The treatise explains why Śakra aroused this mind—the simile of dry wool and wet wool. The treatise-author explains: Śakra is lord of the gods, and 「利根、智勝、信佛法故,倍復增益;如火得風,愈更熾盛」 tr. "because his faculties are sharp, his wisdom superior, and he has faith in the Buddha-dharma, it increases twice over; like fire that gets the wind, it blazes all the more". Having heard Subhūti praise prajñā by all kinds of causes and conditions, and the Buddha complete that praise with deep principle, he aroused a rare mind: because of offerings made to the buddhas in former lives and the condition of good friends in this life, one who hears prajñā can have faith; this person has for immeasurable asaṃkhyeya kalpas practised the six perfections and other merits, and so, though he has not yet attained the ground of the avaivartika, he does not doubt and does not regret in the deep Dharma. The simile says: 「譬如新劈乾毳,隨風東西;濕毳緤緻,則不可動。」 tr. "It is like freshly split dry wool, which goes east and west with the wind; wet wool, densely felted, cannot be moved." A bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind, thin in merit, follows what others say, like dry wool with the wind; one who has long cultivated merit does not follow what others say, like wet wool, tight and dense, unmoving—whether the power of faith is firm or brittle depends wholly on how thick or thin the accumulation is.
6. Śāriputra says to the Buddha—not yet having entered the bodhisattva position, yet no different from an avaivartika. While Śakra is reflecting on and thinking of the immeasurable merit of prajñā, Śāriputra knows what Śakra is thinking and says to the Buddha: good men and good women who, 「雖未入菩薩位,能信受深般若波羅蜜,不驚、不怖,如說修行」 tr. "though they have not yet entered the bodhisattva position, can have faith in and receive the deep prajñāpāramitā, are not startled, not terrified, and cultivate and practise as it is taught"—because of their great merit, wisdom, and power of faith, 「當知如阿鞞跋致無異」 tr. "know that they are like an avaivartika, no different". The rank has not yet been reached and yet faith and practice are already complete; the treatise-author specially records that Śāriputra utters this praise on behalf of the assembly—where the power of faith reaches, the rank can be granted in advance, and this is precisely the first level of praise in this chapter's praise of practising in faith.
7. Planting in the air and the simile of the inchworm—able to give up without anything to rely on: this is a rare thing. The treatise-author explains the causes and conditions the Buddha himself stated: prajñā is very deep; 「無相可取、可信、可受;若能信受,是為希有」 tr. "there is no mark that can be grasped, had faith in, or received; if one can have faith in it and receive it, this is rare", like a person planting in the air, which is exceedingly hard. When ordinary people gain a superior dharma they give up the thing they had—gaining the bliss of meditative absorption, they give up the pleasure of the five desires, and so on up to relying on the Summit of Existence and giving up the merits of the Sphere of Nothingness—they 「不能無所依止而有所捨」 tr. "cannot give something up without anything to rely on". It is like the inchworm following a twig: it sets down its front feet and moves up its back feet, and when it reaches the tip of the tree and there is nothing further to rely on, it goes back to where it started. That the bodhisattva who has not yet attained the path, in regard to prajñā, 「無所依止,而能修福德、捨五欲,是事希有」 tr. "without anything to rely on, can cultivate merit and give up the five desires—this is a rare thing"! The causes and conditions by which he can do so are still faith and receiving in former lives, long practice of the six perfections, and the great gathering of all merits.
8. Disparagement also comes from long habit; three explanations of how one who has fallen into hell and finished the penalty comes to hear prajñā again. The treatise-author explains the reverse side: 「與信相違,則毀呰般若波羅蜜。如厚福德者,從久積集;不信毀呰者,亦從久習。」 tr. "What is contrary to faith disparages prajñāpāramitā. As one of thick merit comes from long accumulation, so one who disbelieves and disparages also comes from long habit." Question: one who disparaged and slandered in a former life should fall into hell—by what condition does he come to hear prajñā again? The answer has three explanations: one explanation is that this person fell into hell, finished the penalty, and came back to disparage again, and it does not say this is the immediately following body; another explanation is that karma, when accumulated thick and heavy, can give its result, and this person, though he did not believe in a former life, had not yet accumulated thick karma and had not yet received its result, and 「以餘福德故生人中,續復不信」 tr. "because of remaining merit was born among humans, and still continues not to believe"; a third is that the five heinous offences must be received in the immediately following body, while other offences are not so—in the following body or in a body long after. Slander has its recompense, and hearing the Dharma has its condition; the three explanations stand side by side to reconcile them—the treatise-author records the various explanations and does not force a decision on one.
9. The explanation that the five heinous sins must be received in the immediately following body; Śakra concludes that unbelief is nothing to wonder at. Again, someone says: 「五逆罪,次後身必受;餘罪不爾,或次後身、或久後身。」 tr. "The five heinous sins are necessarily received in the immediately following body; other sins are not so—they may be received in the immediately following body, or in a body long after." The sin of slandering the Dharma is not among the fixed karma of the five heinous sins, so the recompense comes late or soon, and one whose recompense is late can still hear the Dharma in between. At that time Śakra says to Śāriputra: prajñā is 「畢竟空、無所有故甚深」 tr. "very deep because it is ultimate emptiness and without anything existent"; if a bodhisattva has not long practised merit, then his 「著心堅固、信力微弱」 tr. "attached mind is firm and his power of faith feeble", and that he does not believe in prajñā and so on up to omniscience—what is there to wonder at? The attached mind and the power of faith stand in inverse proportion—when attachment is firm, faith is weak; this is the pathology of unbelief, and it is also where the cultivation of faith sets to work.
10. Śakra utters the words of worshipping prajñā—to worship omniscience is to worship the buddhas of the three times and the ten directions. Śakra reflects and weighs it: 「信般若波羅蜜福德無量,不信者得罪深重。」 tr. "The merit of having faith in prajñāpāramitā is immeasurable; one who does not believe incurs deep and heavy sin." Because he deeply loves and reveres prajñā, he speaks out: I shall worship this prajñā! Why? 「禮般若波羅蜜,則為禮一切智;禮一切智者,則禮三世十方諸佛。」 tr. "To worship prajñāpāramitā is to worship omniscience; one who worships omniscience worships the buddhas of the three times and the ten directions." At that time the Buddha approves his words and further states the causes and conditions for praising prajñā: all the knowledge and wisdom of the buddhas is born from within prajñā, and so it says that one who wishes to abide in omniscience, and so on up to gathering together the whole bhikṣu Saṅgha, should train in prajñā. The reach of worship is pushed up layer by layer—prajñā, omniscience, the buddhas of the three times and the ten directions, three that are threaded as one; where one worships prajñā, one worships all the buddhas everywhere.
11. Śakra asks about the gate of practice—how does one abide, how does one train. At the opening of Sūtra ②, Śakra says to the Buddha: when a bodhisattva-mahāsattva wishes to practise prajñā, 「云何名住」 tr. "what is called abiding" in prajñāpāramitā, dhyāna, vīrya, kṣānti, śīla, and dānapāramitā? How does one abide in inner emptiness and so on up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas, in the four dhyānas, the four immeasurable minds, the four formless absorptions, and the five supernormal powers, in the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eight limbs of the noble path, in the ten powers of the Buddha and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas? 「云何習行」 tr. "How does one train" prajñā and so on up to dānapāramitā, inner emptiness and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas? The passage above has already made clear that one should train in prajñā; this question presses 「當習」 tr. "one should train" into 「云何習」 tr. "how does one train"—turning from the exhortation to faith into the gate of practice, it is the pivot of the sūtra text of this unit.
12. The Buddha answers that not abiding is training—not abiding in form is training in prajñā; not training in form is called training in form. The Buddha first praises him, "Excellent!": 「汝能樂問是事,皆是佛神力!」 tr. "That you are able and glad to ask about this matter is all the Buddha's spiritual power!" Then he answers directly: if a bodhisattva 「不住色中,為習行般若波羅蜜」 tr. "does not abide in form, that is training in prajñāpāramitā", and not abiding in feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness is likewise; so too with eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind, with forms, sounds, smells, tastes, tangibles, and dharmas, with the eye-element and so on up to the mind-consciousness element. Not abiding in prajñā is training in prajñā, and so it is with each of the six perfections; so it is with inner emptiness and so on up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas, with the four dhyānas and so on up to the five supernormal powers, with the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eight limbs of the noble path, with the ten powers of the Buddha and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas. The causes and conditions are that 「不得色可住可習處」 tr. "one does not find in form a place where one can abide or train". Then it turns one level further: 「菩薩摩訶薩不習色,若不習色,是名習色」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva does not train in form; if he does not train in form, this is called training in form"—searching through the three times, 「色前際不可得、中際不可得、後際不可得」 tr. "the prior limit of form is unfindable, its middle limit is unfindable, its later limit is unfindable". Not abiding is exactly training, not training in is exactly practising; here the gate of practice has no place to be seized, and everywhere is practice.
13. Śāriputra's first praise, very deep and hard to fathom—because the suchness of form is very deep, prajñā is very deep. Śāriputra says to the Buddha: 「是般若波羅蜜甚深!」 tr. "This prajñāpāramitā is very deep!" The Buddha says: 「色如甚深故,般若波羅蜜甚深」 tr. "because the suchness of form is very deep, prajñāpāramitā is very deep", and it is likewise because the suchness of feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness is very deep, and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas. Śāriputra says again: 「是般若波羅蜜難可測量!」 tr. "This prajñāpāramitā is hard to fathom!" The depth of prajñā is not a separate depth apart from dharmas; it is deep in respect of the 「如」 tr. "suchness" of form and all dharmas—suchness is the real mark of all dharmas; the form the eye sees is not deep, the suchness of form is what is deep. The words of praise land on prajñā, and the Buddha turns them, one by one, to point at all dharmas: the depth lies not in the one who contemplates but in the real mark that is contemplated.
14. The two praises hard to fathom and immeasurable—because form is hard to fathom, prajñā is hard to fathom; because form is immeasurable, prajñā is immeasurable. The Buddha answers the praise of being hard to fathom: 「色難可測量故,般若波羅蜜難可測量」 tr. "because form is hard to fathom, prajñāpāramitā is hard to fathom", and it is likewise because feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, are hard to fathom. Śāriputra's third praise: 「世尊!是般若波羅蜜無量!」 tr. "World-Honored One! This prajñāpāramitā is immeasurable!" The Buddha says: 「色無量故,般若波羅蜜無量」 tr. "because form is immeasurable, prajñāpāramitā is immeasurable", and likewise because everything up to the eighteen unshared dharmas is immeasurable. The three praises—very deep, hard to fathom, immeasurable—are uniformly of one structure: the virtue of prajñā is the virtue of all dharmas; because every dharma is such, every dharma is deep—the three rounds of question and answer sung over one another teach one precisely to see prajñā in the one form, the one dharma right in front of one, and not to look for depth outside dharmas.
15. Not practising the very deep is practising prajñā—the mark of the very deep is not form. The Buddha tells Śāriputra: when a bodhisattva practises prajñā, 「不行色甚深,為行般若波羅蜜」 tr. "not practising the depth of form is practising prajñāpāramitā", and so on up to not practising the depth of the eighteen unshared dharmas, likewise. Why? 「色甚深相為非色」 tr. "The mark of the depth of form is not form"—if the mark of the very deep were set up as a fixed mark of form, that would no longer be the real mark of form. The two further layers, hard to fathom and immeasurable, follow the same pattern: not practising form's being hard to fathom, not practising form's being immeasurable, is practising prajñā; the mark of being hard to fathom and the mark of being immeasurable are both not form, and so on up to not the eighteen unshared dharmas. The earlier three praises were praise according to reality; these three negations examine the grasping of marks: to gain the praise and then cling to that praise turns the mark of depth into a new bond, and so even the mark of the very deep is not practised.
16. It should not be spoken before those who have newly aroused the mind—it should be spoken before the avaivartika. Śāriputra says to the Buddha: prajñā is very deep; 「甚深相難見、難解、不可思量,不應在新發意菩薩前說」 tr. "the mark of the very deep is hard to see, hard to understand, and not to be thought out or measured; it should not be spoken before bodhisattvas who have newly aroused the mind". Why? A bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind, hearing this very deep prajñā, 「或當驚怖,心生疑悔,不信、不行」 tr. "may be startled and terrified, his mind giving rise to doubt and regret, and not believe and not practise". It should be spoken before avaivartika bodhisattvas; such a bodhisattva, hearing it, is 「不驚、不怖,心不疑悔,則能信行」 tr. "not startled, not terrified, his mind without doubt and regret, and so he can have faith and practise". The Dharma makes no selection, but hearers are fit or unfit, and the one who speaks the Dharma cannot but choose according to the capacity—when the very deep Dharma meets a capacity of shallow faith, not only is there no benefit, it becomes instead a condition of harm, and the passage below makes that fault clear.
17. The fault of speaking before those who have newly aroused the mind—disparaging and not believing plants the karma of the three evil destinies. Śakra asks Śāriputra: if this deep prajñā is spoken before bodhisattvas who have newly aroused the mind, 「有何等過」 tr. "what fault is there"? Śāriputra replies: a bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind, hearing it, may be startled and terrified, disparage it, and not believe—「是新發意菩薩或有是處」 tr. "for this bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind, this is possible"; if he disparages it and does not believe, he 「種三惡道業;是業因緣故,久久難得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "plants the karma of the three evil destinies; because of the causes and conditions of this karma, for a long, long time it is hard for him to attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi". The fault lies not in hearing but in disparaging—hearing and giving rise to disparagement, a single word slandering the Dharma completes the karma of the three evil destinies, and awakening moves farther away. To protect the root of faith of the new trainee is precisely to protect his road to awakening; it is not keeping the Dharma secret and withholding it.
18. The treatise explains Śakra's question and why the Buddha praises him, "Excellent!" The treatise-author explains: because Śakra has heard from the Buddha the praise of prajñā in full, he now asks the Buddha: how does a bodhisattva abide in prajñā, from dhyānapāramitā and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas? The Buddha's praise, "Excellent, excellent!", is 「以釋提桓因諸天中主,言必可信。問是事,斷大眾疑,通達無礙,能大利益」 tr. "because Śakra Devānām Indra is lord among the gods, his words are sure to be trusted. Asking about this matter cuts off the doubts of the great assembly, penetrates without obstruction, and can greatly benefit". Again, because Śakra 「能捨上妙五欲、七寶、宮殿,能問佛賢聖所行事」 tr. "can give up the supremely wondrous five desires, the seven jewels, and palaces, and can ask about the matters practised by buddhas, sages, and saints", for this reason the Buddha says "Excellent!" One praise, two reasons: from the side of the hearers, when the lord of the gods asks, the doubts of the assembly are cut off together; from the side of the one who asks, giving up desire to ask about the path, his mind is precious—"Excellent!" is not a courtesy but a confirmation from both sides, the capacity and the mind.
19. By the Buddha's spiritual power he can ask; by not abiding in form one can train—ordinary people cling to form and lose the path. The treatise-author explains 「以佛神力故,汝能樂問此事」 tr. "it is by the Buddha's spiritual power that you are able and glad to ask about this matter": in the assembly there were also supremely wondrous gods who beheld the Buddha's immeasurable spiritual virtue, yet now Śakra can consult the Buddha on the Buddha's matters in the midst of the great assembly, and so it is the Buddha's majestic spiritual power; as the Sūtra of Holding the Mind says: 「佛光明入身中,能問佛事。」 tr. "The Buddha's light enters into the body, and one can ask about the Buddha's matters." He also explains the Buddha's answer: a bodhisattva 「見色無常、苦等過罪,故不住色;若不住色,即是能習行般若波羅蜜」 tr. "sees the faults and wrongs of form—impermanence, suffering, and the rest—and so does not abide in form; if he does not abide in form, he is able to train in prajñāpāramitā". Ordinary people, 「見色著色故,起顛倒煩惱」 tr. "because they see form and cling to form, give rise to inverted afflictions", and lose this path of prajñā. For this reason, one who does not abide can train in prajñā; so too with the five aggregates, the twelve sense-fields, and the eighteen elements. The meaning of not abiding is first established from contemplating the faults—because one sees the faults one does not abide, and because one does not abide one does not lose.
20. The question of each of the six perfections training in its own practice—not clinging, one trains in purely. Question: why is it said that by not abiding in the six perfections and the rest, each trains in its own practice? Answer: 「是六波羅蜜等皆是善法行法」 tr. "these six perfections and the rest are all wholesome dharmas, dharmas of practice"; for this reason it speaks of not abiding in the six perfections and the rest as each training in its own practice; with the aggregates, the elements, and the sense-fields, it is training in prajñāpāramitā. If one does not cling in these dharmas, one cuts off loving attachment; 「斷愛著故,色等諸法中清淨習」 tr. "because loving attachment is cut off, in form and all dharmas one trains in purely". The wording of the sūtra text differs: of the six perfections it says not abiding in a given perfection is training in that perfection; of the aggregates, elements, and sense-fields it says not abiding is training in prajñā—wholesome dharmas can each be trained in respect of their own practice, while the aggregates, elements, and sense-fields serve only as the field contemplated by prajñā; yet the pivot is the same single not clinging, and because one does not cling one's training is pure.
21. The causes and conditions of not abiding and not training—training in form is called grasping at the mark of form. The treatise-author explains: here it states the causes and conditions of not abiding, 「所謂不得色等法住處,不得色等法習處」 tr. "namely, one does not find in form and other dharmas a place to abide, does not find in form and other dharmas a place to train". Again, because this matter is hard to understand, the Buddha further states the causes and conditions: 「不習色」 tr. "not training in form" means the bodhisattva sees the faults of form and so does not abide in form, and because he does not abide he does not practise it. 「習色」 tr. "Training in form" is called grasping at the mark of form, as permanent or as impermanent, and so on. Again, the bodhisattva constantly practises wholesome dharmas, right speech, right action, and the rest, 「積習純厚」 tr. "accumulating habit pure and thick", and so it is called practising form. The one word ‘train’ has two glosses: the habit of grasping at marks and discriminating is what is negated; the habit of accumulating wholesome dharmas is what is accomplished—the habit of grasping at marks is negated precisely to accomplish the habit of purity; do not misread ‘not training’ as abandoning practice.
22. Form in the three times is unfindable—contemplating dharmas as scattered and broken, not grasping at marks, is called being able to train in the real mark. The treatise-author explains the deep meaning of not training: now the bodhisattva, because he wishes to practise prajñā, 「散壞是色,不習」 tr. "scatters and breaks up this form, and does not train in it". Why? 「過去色已滅、未來色未有故不可習;現在色生時即滅故不住」 tr. "Past form has already ceased and future form does not yet exist, so they cannot be trained; present form ceases the moment it arises, so it does not abide"; if even abiding for one thought there is still no training, how much less when it ceases thought after thought? Therefore it states the causes and conditions of not training in form: 「三世色不可得。」 tr. "Form in the three times is unfindable." And so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, likewise. 「若能如是觀諸法散壞,不取相」 tr. "If one can in this way contemplate all dharmas as scattered and broken, and not grasp at marks", this is called 「能習色等諸法實相」 tr. "being able to train in the real mark of form and all dharmas". Not training to the very end turns over into being able to train—what is practised is not the mark of form but the real mark of form; the joint of the sūtra's words 「若不習色,是名習色」 tr. "if he does not train in form, this is called training in form" lies precisely in this turn.
23. The simile of raindrops and the great sea—form discriminated and entering what is as it really is, is therefore very deep. The treatise-author explains Śāriputra's praise: Śāriputra heard this meaning from the Buddha, 「歡喜,深入空智」 tr. "rejoiced, and entered deeply into the knowledge of emptiness", and said to the Buddha that prajñā is very deep; the Buddha affirmed it and completed his praise: because the suchness of form and all dharmas is so, it is very deep. The Buddha's words: 「不但眼見色甚深,以般若波羅蜜分別色入如實故甚深。」 tr. "It is not merely that the form the eye sees is very deep; it is because, by prajñāpāramitā, form is discriminated and enters what is as it really is, that it is very deep." The simile says: 「如雨渧渧,不名甚深;和合眾流,入於大海,乃名甚深。」 tr. "Raindrops, drop by drop, are not called very deep; gathered together in many streams and entering the great sea, they are then called very deep." A single drop of water does not make depth; only when many streams return to the sea is depth and breadth seen; the mark of a single form is not enough to call deep; when it is discriminated by prajñā and enters what is as it really is, form begins to show its depth—the depth lies in the entering, not on the surface of form.
24. The wisdom-eye contemplates the deep; because it is very deep it is immeasurable—weighing and measuring has faults. The treatise-author continues: 「天眼、肉眼,見淺而不深;若以慧眼觀,則深不可測。」 tr. "The divine eye and the fleshly eye see the shallow and not the deep; if one contemplates with the wisdom-eye, then it is deep beyond fathoming." Because it is very deep it is hard to fathom; 「唯有諸佛乃盡其底」 tr. "only the buddhas reach its bottom". Because it is very deep and cannot be fathomed, it is called immeasurable—「無有智慧能取色等實相,若常、若無常,籌量有過罪故」 tr. "there is no wisdom that can grasp the real mark of form and the rest, as permanent or as impermanent, because weighing and measuring has faults and wrongs". At this time Śāriputra and all the listeners had this thought: prajñā cannot be fathomed and has no measure; 「菩薩當云何行」 tr. "how should the bodhisattva practise"? The meaning of the three praises is gathered in here: deep, hard to fathom, and immeasurable are three advances of one meaning, and the thought of the listeners naturally turns out the question of the gate of practice—since it is immeasurable, where does one set to work?
25. The simile that the depth of water is not fixed—depth and shallowness are spoken of distinctly for beings sharp and dull. The Buddha knows their thought and tells Śāriputra: a bodhisattva, 「若行色等甚深者,則為失般若波羅蜜;若不行色甚深,是為得般若波羅蜜」 tr. "if he practises the depth of form and the rest, then he loses prajñāpāramitā; if he does not practise the depth of form, this is gaining prajñāpāramitā". The treatise-author explains: because ordinary people are dull in faculty, it is called very deep; for those of one-pointed mind, of merit, of sharp faculties, it is not very deep. 「譬如水深淺無定,若於小兒則深,長者則淺」 tr. "It is like water, whose depth and shallowness are not fixed: to a small child it is deep, to a grown man it is shallow"; and so on up to the great sea, deep to a human, shallow to the asura king Rāhu. To ordinary people, to those who have newly aroused the mind, and to the lazy it is very deep; to the avaivartika who has long accumulated virtue it is shallow; 「諸佛如羅睺阿修羅王,於一切法無有深者,得無礙解脫故」 tr. "the buddhas are like the asura king Rāhu: among all dharmas there is none that is deep to them, because they have attained unobstructed liberation". Depth and shallowness are not in the dharma but in the capacity—for the sake of beings, and of the season, sharp or dull, first or long-practised, lazy or vigorous, depth and shallowness are spoken of distinctly.
26. The mark of the very deep is not form; the question of why Śāriputra again speaks of the very deep. The treatise-author cites the causes and conditions the Buddha himself stated: 「色等法甚深相為非色。何以故?怖畏、心沒、疑悔故,以色為甚深,色相則無深。」 tr. "The mark of the depth of form and other dharmas is not form. Why? Because of fear, the sinking of the mind, and doubt and regret, one takes form as very deep; the mark of form in itself has no depth." Depth is cast onto the dharma by the fear, doubt, and regret in the mind; the mark of form itself has no depth that can be set up. Śāriputra says to the Buddha: prajñā is very deep, and the mark of the very deep is hard to see and hard to understand. Question: above it says 「菩薩不行甚深,為行般若波羅蜜」 tr. "the bodhisattva not practising the very deep is practising prajñāpāramitā"; why now does Śāriputra again speak of the very deep? Having negated the practice of the very deep, why does he again praise the very deep with his mouth—this question brings into the open, on the reader's behalf, the surface contradiction in the sūtra text, and the next passage resolves it.
27. He speaks of the very deep for the sake of people—the simile of not letting a small child cross deep water. Answer: 「舍利弗非定心說甚深,得佛意趣,為人故說甚深。」 tr. "Śāriputra does not speak of the very deep with a fixed mind; he has grasped the Buddha's intent, and speaks of the very deep for the sake of people." For this reason it says here: this prajñā should not be spoken before bodhisattvas who have newly aroused the mind, for a bodhisattva new to the training, hearing this deep wisdom, 「則心沒」 tr. "then his mind sinks"; it should be spoken before avaivartika bodhisattvas, because the avaivartika's wisdom is deep, and he 「信而不沒」 tr. "has faith and does not sink". The simile says: 「譬如深水,不應使小兒渡,應教大人令渡。」 tr. "It is like deep water: one should not make a small child cross it; one should teach a grown person to cross it." To speak of depth is not to grasp at the mark of depth; it is a teaching set up according to the capacity—in one's own mind no fixed mark is set up, and for the sake of others one cannot but distinguish deep and shallow; the two do not obstruct each other.
28. A close explanation of the fault for those who have newly aroused the mind—the fear of annihilation and the bind of not receiving. The treatise-author explains Śakra's question, "what fault is there": Śāriputra answers that those who have newly aroused the mind then do not believe and their minds sink; 「心沒故生疑悔、怖畏」 tr. "because the mind sinks, doubt and regret, fear and dread arise"—the bind of being able neither to advance nor to retreat is: 「若受一切空法,我云何當墮斷滅中?若不受者,佛所說法,何可不受!」 tr. "If I receive the dharma that all is empty, how shall I not fall into annihilation? If I do not receive it—it is the Dharma spoken by the Buddha; how can I not receive it!" For this reason there is fear, and doubt and regret arise. If the mind becomes fixed, it gives rise to evil and wrong disparagement; the recompense of disparagement is as told in the Chapter on the Hells, and here it is stated in brief: 「種三惡道業因緣,久久難得無上道。」 tr. "One plants the causes and conditions of the karma of the three evil destinies, and for a long, long time it is hard to attain the unsurpassed path." Fear is still a light fault; a fixed mind giving rise to disparagement becomes heavy karma—the care with which the capacity is protected lies precisely at the gate of disparagement and slander.
29. One who has not received the prediction hears and can have faith—receiving the prediction within no more than one buddha or two. At the opening of Sūtra ③, Śakra asks Śāriputra: 「頗有未受記菩薩摩訶薩聞是深般若波羅蜜不驚、不怖者不?」 tr. "Is there any bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has not received the prediction, who hears this deep prajñāpāramitā and is not startled and not terrified?" Śāriputra says: there is! If a bodhisattva hears this deep prajñā and is not startled or terrified, 「當知是菩薩,受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久,不過一佛、兩佛」 tr. "know that this bodhisattva will receive the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi before long, within no more than one buddha or two buddhas". Above it was said that faith comes from causes in former lives; here the predictive meaning of faith is turned out: to be able to have faith and not be startled is the mark that the prediction is at hand—faith is not only the verification on the side of the result; it is even more a pledge on the side of the cause.
30. The Buddha confirms it; Śāriputra gives the simile of the dream—practising the six perfections in a dream is already near to awakening. The Buddha tells Śāriputra: Just so! Just so! This bodhisattva has 「久發意、行六波羅蜜、多供養諸佛」 tr. "long aroused the intent, practised the six perfections, and made offerings to many buddhas", and hearing this deep prajñā is not startled, not terrified, not afraid, and on hearing it at once receives and upholds it and practises as it is taught. Śāriputra tells the Buddha he wishes to give a simile: one who seeks the bodhisattva path and 「夢中」 tr. "in a dream" cultivates and practises prajñā, enters meditative absorption, is diligent and vigorous, is complete in patience, guards morality, practises giving, cultivates and practises inner emptiness and outer emptiness, and so on up to sitting at the seat of awakening—know that this person is near to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi; 「何況」 tr. "how much more" one who, awake, cultivates and practises the six perfections—how should he not swiftly accomplish awakening and sit at the seat of awakening! One whose roots of goodness are accomplished, who gets to hear prajñā, receives and upholds it, and so on up to practising as it is taught—know that he has long aroused the intent, planted roots of goodness, made offerings to many buddhas, and kept company with good friends, and is 「近受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記」 tr. "near to receiving the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi", like an avaivartika, unmoving and unturning in regard to awakening. If practice in a dream is so, practice when awake can be known—reasoning from the light to the heavy, the momentum is like splitting bamboo.
31. The simile of the dangerous road—seeing herdsmen, boundary marks, and gardens, one knows the town, city, and village are not far. Śāriputra gives the first simile: it is like a person who wishes to cross 「百由旬、若二百、三百、四百由旬曠野嶮道」 tr. "a dangerous road through the wilderness of a hundred yojanas, or two hundred, three hundred, or four hundred yojanas", who first sees various signs: herdsmen, boundary marks, gardens, and so knows he is near a city, a town, a village. Having seen these signs, this person thinks: from the signs I have seen, know that the town and the village are not far. 「心得安隱,不畏賊難、惡蟲、飢渴。」 tr. "His mind gains peace and security, and he does not fear the danger of bandits, evil insects, hunger, or thirst." The dangerous road is not yet ended, but the prior signs have already appeared, and the mind is at peace first—the crux of the simile lies in the two words ‘prior signs’: though the result has not yet arrived, the signs can be relied on, and in the fitting to the Dharma below each has its counterpart.
32. Fitting it to the Dharma—gaining prajñā is itself the prior sign; one should not fear falling to the ground of the two vehicles. Śāriputra fits it himself: so it is with the bodhisattva; 「若得是深般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念,當知近受得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久」 tr. "if he gains this deep prajñāpāramitā and receives and upholds it, reads it, recites it, and so on up to rightly recollecting it, know that he is near, and will receive the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi before long"; know that this bodhisattva 「不應畏墮聲聞、辟支佛地」 tr. "need not fear falling to the ground of the śrāvaka or the pratyekabuddha". What are the prior signs? 「是諸先相,所謂甚深般若波羅蜜,得聞、得見、得受乃至正憶念故。」 tr. "These prior signs are namely that the very deep prajñāpāramitā is heard, seen, received, and so on up to rightly recollected." Getting to hear prajñā is itself the sign that the prediction is about to arrive—the herdsmen, boundary marks, and gardens the traveller seeks on the dangerous road are this very scroll of prajñā in one's hands.
33. The simile of the great sea—level ground without trees or mountains, one knows the sea is not far. The Buddha says: if you are glad to speak further, then speak. Śāriputra gives the second simile: it is like a person who wishes to see the great sea and sets out toward it; he 「不見樹相、不見山相」 tr. "sees no sign of trees, sees no sign of mountains", and though he has not yet seen the great sea, he knows the great sea is not far; why? 「大海處平,無樹相、無山相故。」 tr. "Because where the great sea is, it is level, without the sign of trees, without the sign of mountains." When a bodhisattva hears this deep prajñā, receives and upholds it, and so on up to rightly recollecting it, 「雖未佛前受劫數之記」 tr. "though he has not yet received before a Buddha the prediction with its count of kalpas", whether a hundred kalpas, a thousand kalpas, ten thousand kalpas, or a hundred thousand myriad koṭi of kalpas, this bodhisattva 「自知近受阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久」 tr. "himself knows that he is near, and will receive the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi before long". The previous simile takes the presence of signs as its sign; this simile takes the absence of signs as its sign—where the trees and mountains end is the seashore; where the signs gradually fade away is near to awakening; the two similes, one positive and one negative, complement each other.
34. The simile of the spring tree—the old leaves have fallen, and flowers and fruit are not far off. The third simile: it is like early spring, when 「諸樹陳葉已墮,當知此樹新葉華果出在不久」 tr. "the old leaves of the trees have already fallen, and one knows that this tree's new leaves, flowers, and fruit will come forth before long"; the people of Jambudvīpa, seeing the prior signs of the trees, all greatly rejoice. When a bodhisattva gets to hear the deep prajñā, receives and upholds it, reads and recites it, and so on up to rightly recollecting it and practising as it is taught, know that his roots of goodness are accomplished and he has made offerings to many buddhas. This bodhisattva should think thus: 「先世善根所追,趣阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "pursued by the roots of goodness of former lives, I am heading for anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi", and by these causes and conditions I get to see and hear this deep prajñā. Among them, the gods who have seen the Buddha rejoice and leap for joy: 「先諸菩薩摩訶薩亦有如是受記先相」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas of before also had such prior signs of receiving the prediction", and this bodhisattva too will receive the prediction before long. The falling of the old leaves is the season of new flourishing—where the afflictions wither, the roots of goodness put forth; even the gods watching from the side can recognise this sign, as one recognises the tidings of spring.
35. The simile of the woman with child—seeing the prior signs, one knows the birth is not far. The fourth simile: it is like a woman with child whose 「身體苦重,行步不便,坐起不安,眠食轉少,不喜言語,厭本所習」 tr. "body is burdened and heavy, whose walking is awkward, whose sitting and rising are uneasy, whose sleep and eating grow less, who does not like to talk, and who grows weary of her former habits", because she is undergoing pain; other women, seeing her prior signs, 「當知產生不久」 tr. "know that the birth is not far off". So it is with the bodhisattva: he plants roots of goodness, makes offerings to many buddhas, has long practised the six perfections, keeps company with good friends, his roots of goodness are accomplished, and he gets to hear the deep prajñā, receives and upholds it, reads and recites it, and so on up to rightly recollecting it and practising as it is taught; 「諸菩薩亦知是菩薩摩訶薩得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提記不久」 tr. "the bodhisattvas too know that this bodhisattva-mahāsattva will attain the prediction of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi before long". With this the four similes reach their most intimate point—the conception of the fruit of the path is complete, the marks of the body change of themselves, and one who knows recognises it at a glance; the phrase ‘weary of her former habits’ is above all the verification that the bearing of the practitioner is changing.
36. Subhūti praises the entrusting well; the Buddha speaks at length of the bodhisattva practising himself and teaching others. The Buddha praises Śāriputra: 「善哉!善哉!汝所樂說,皆是佛力。」 tr. "Excellent! Excellent! What you are glad to speak is all the Buddha's power." At that time Subhūti says to the Buddha: 「希有!世尊!諸多陀阿伽度、阿羅呵、三藐三佛陀善付諸菩薩摩訶薩事!」 tr. "It is rare, World-Honored One! How well the tathāgatas, arhats, samyaksaṃbuddhas entrust the affairs of the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas!" The Buddha tells Subhūti: these bodhisattvas arouse the mind of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi 「安隱多眾生,令無量眾生得樂,憐愍、安樂、饒益諸天人故」 tr. "to bring peace and security to many beings, to let immeasurable beings gain happiness, and out of pity, to give ease and abundant benefit to gods and humans"; when they practise the bodhisattva path they gather immeasurable hundreds of thousands of beings by four things—「布施、愛語、利益、同事」 tr. "giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour"—and also bring beings to accomplishment by the ten wholesome paths; they themselves practise the first dhyāna and so on up to the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception, and themselves practise the six perfections, and teach others all these as well; having gained prajñā, by the power of skilful means they teach beings to gain the fruit of srota-āpanna and so on up to the path of the pratyekabuddha, while 「自於內不證」 tr. "he himself does not realise them within"; they themselves abide in the ground of the avaivartika, purify buddha-worlds, bring beings to accomplishment, gain the bodhisattva's supernormal powers, purify the gates of dhāraṇī, are complete in the eloquence of delighting in speech, accomplish the receiving of form, the thirty-two marks, the youthful state, the ten powers of the Buddha, the four fearlessnesses, the eighteen unshared dharmas, great kindness and great compassion, omniscience of all kinds, freedom from all fetters together with their residual habits, and so on up to 「自轉法輪,亦教他人轉法輪」 tr. "themselves turning the wheel of the Dharma and also teaching others to turn the wheel of the Dharma"—each one is practising oneself and teaching others.
37. The treatise explains the question of one who has not received the prediction yet can have faith—the simile of the fish that has swallowed the hook arises. The treatise-author explains: Śakra asks whether there is any bodhisattva who has not received the prediction who hears this deep prajñā and is not startled or terrified, and Śāriputra says: 「無有不受記聞般若能信者。若或時能信者,當知垂欲受記,不過見一佛、二佛,便得受記。」 tr. "There is no one who has not received the prediction who hears prajñā and can have faith. If at times there is one who can have faith, know that he is on the verge of receiving the prediction; within seeing no more than one buddha or two buddhas, he will receive the prediction." The Buddha approves Śāriputra's words. Śāriputra, hearing the Buddha approve what he said, rejoices in his mind, and because he wishes to make this matter still more distinct and clear, he gives similes: 「夢中心為睡所覆故,非真心所作」 tr. "because in a dream the mind is covered by sleep, it is not what the true mind does"; one who in a dream arouses the intent and practises the six perfections, and so on up to sitting at the seat of awakening—this person's merit is light and slight, yet he is near to receiving the prediction; how much more one who, awake, with a real mind arouses awakening and practises the six perfections—how should he not be near to receiving the prediction! If a person going back and forth in birth and death through the six destinies at some time gets to hear prajñā, receives and upholds it, reads and recites it, and rightly recollects it, 「必知是人不久得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "one knows for certain that this person will before long attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi".
38. The simile of the fish that has swallowed the hook—one who deeply believes in and delights in prajñā does not long abide in birth and death. The treatise-author gives a simile of his own: 「如吞鉤之魚,雖復遊戲池中,當知出在不久;行者亦如是,深信樂般若波羅蜜,不久住於生死。」 tr. "Like a fish that has swallowed the hook: though it still plays in the pond, know that it will be out before long; so it is with the practitioner: one who deeply believes in and delights in prajñāpāramitā will not long abide in birth and death." The fish has already swallowed the hook; it plays as before, yet the time of leaving the water is set; the practitioner with one thought deeply believes in prajñā; his traces are still in birth and death, but his going beyond is already fixed. This simile fills in a layer the four similes had not reached: the prior signs can be recognised not only from outward marks; the mind of faith and delight is itself the hook already swallowed—one who is caught by the hook of prajñā cannot be held by birth and death.
39. Fitting the simile of the dangerous road—two explanations of the four hundred yojanas. The treatise-author explains how the simile of the dangerous road fits the Dharma: ‘the dangerous road is the world’. A hundred yojanas is the desire realm, two hundred yojanas is the form realm, three hundred yojanas is the formless realm, four hundred yojanas is the path of the śrāvaka and the pratyekabuddha; again, four hundred yojanas is the desire realm, three hundred yojanas is the form realm, two hundred yojanas is the formless realm, a hundred yojanas is the śrāvaka and the pratyekabuddha. The two matchings stand side by side: the first takes the three realms as near and the two vehicles as far, speaking of the order of leaving; the second takes the desire realm as farthest, speaking of the weight of difficulty to cross—because the bonds of the desire realm are thickest, its road is longest. The treatise-author keeps both explanations, rightly showing that the living phrase of a simile is not to be read as dead.
40. The signs on the dangerous road fitted to the Dharma one by one—the bandits are wrong views, the evil insects are the afflictions. The treatise-author continues fitting: 「欲出」 tr. "wishing to get out" is the person who has faith in, receives, and practises prajñā. 「先見諸法相」 tr. "First seeing the signs of dharmas" is seeing great bodhisattvas give up the worldly pleasures of desire and with a deep mind delight in prajñā. 「壃界」 tr. "Boundary marks" is distinguishing dharmas—the dharma of the śrāvaka, the dharma of the pratyekabuddha, the dharma of the Great Vehicle; the small benefit is the śrāvaka, the great benefit is the bodhisattva; 「魔界是生死,佛界是般若波羅蜜、甘露法味不死之處」 tr. "Māra's realm is birth and death; the Buddha's realm is prajñāpāramitā, the ambrosial flavour of the Dharma, the place of the deathless". 「園林」 tr. "Gardens" is the bliss of meditative absorption, wisdom, and the like that accord with the Buddha path. 「聚落」 tr. "The village" is the compliant acceptance of dharmas, 「邑」 tr. "the town" is the acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas, 「城」 tr. "the city" is anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. 「賊」 tr. "Bandits" are the sixty-two wrong views of self and the like, 「惡蟲」 tr. "evil insects" are the afflictions of craving, hatred, and the like; not fearing bandits means humans find no opening, not fearing evil insects means non-humans find no opening; 「不畏飢」 tr. "not fearing hunger" is not fearing to be unable to gain the true wisdom of the sages, 「不畏渴」 tr. "not fearing thirst" is not fearing to be unable to gain the taste of the Dharma-bliss of meditative absorption, liberation, and the like. Matching sign by sign to the Dharma, the stages of acceptance are the post-stations of the journey, and awakening is the city one heads for.
41. Concluding the causes and conditions of the prior signs; not fearing to fall to the two vehicles; the coarse as simile for the subtle. The treatise-author concludes this simile: here it states the causes and conditions itself—「菩薩摩訶薩得先相者,不久當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」 tr. "A bodhisattva-mahāsattva who gains the prior signs will before long attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi." 「不畏墮惡道中、飢餓死」 tr. "Not fearing to fall on the bad road and die of hunger" is fitted to the Dharma as 「不畏墮聲聞、辟支佛地」 tr. "not fearing to fall to the ground of the śrāvaka or the pratyekabuddha"—on the bodhisattva path, the realisation of the two vehicles becomes instead a danger midway, like the traveller's fear of dying of hunger by the roadside. 「佛然可其喻,以麁喻細,以世間喻出世間。」 tr. "The Buddha affirms his simile, using the coarse as a simile for the subtle, using the worldly as a simile for the world-transcending." The simile and what it illustrates are not equal in the first place; one takes only the resemblance; what the Buddha affirms is his using ordinary worldly feeling to lead people into the deep principle that transcends the world.
42. The remaining three similes fitted to the Dharma—the great sea, the tree's flowers and fruit, the woman. The treatise-author says: 「餘三譬喻,亦應如上分別說。」 tr. "The remaining three similes should also be distinguished and explained as above." In brief he shows the essentials: 「大海水」 tr. "the water of the great sea" is the unsurpassed path, 「平地無樹無山」 tr. "level ground without trees and without mountains" is the scrolls of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra and the like; 「樹果」 tr. "the fruit of the tree" is the unsurpassed path, 「樹華」 tr. "the flowers of the tree" is the ground of the avaivartika, 「春時陳葉落,更生新葉」 tr. "in spring the old leaves fall and new leaves grow again" is 「諸煩惱邪見、疑等滅」 tr. "the ceasing of the afflictions, wrong views, doubt, and the like", so that one can gain the scrolls of the prajñā sūtra and the like; 「母人」 tr. "the woman" is the practitioner, 「所任身」 tr. "the body she carries" is the unsurpassed path, 「欲產相」 tr. "the signs of approaching birth" are the bodhisattva's long training in prajñā, 「厭本所習」 tr. "weary of her former habits" is 「患世間婬欲樂,不復喜著」 tr. "being troubled by the worldly pleasures of sexual desire and no longer delighting in and clinging to them". The Buddha praises what he has said: "Excellent!" The fitting of all three similes takes the scrolls of the prajñā sūtra as the sign present before one and the unsurpassed path as the reality carried within—the meaning of the prior signs is threaded through by one.
43. Entrusting well the affairs of the bodhisattvas—the path of emptiness and the path of merit, entrusted to Ānanda, Maitreya, and others. The treatise-author explains Subhūti's praise: Subhūti, hearing the Buddha affirm what Śāriputra said and praise it as excellent, 「知佛意深敬念是菩薩」 tr. "knew that the Buddha's intent deeply reveres and cherishes these bodhisattvas", and so said to the Buddha: the World-Honored One is exceedingly rare, entrusting well the affairs of the bodhisattvas. 「菩薩事」 tr. "The affairs of the bodhisattvas" are 「空道,福德道」 tr. "the path of emptiness and the path of merit"; and as the Buddha has spoken in all kinds of general and particular marks, 「以寄付阿難、彌勒等」 tr. "he entrusts them to Ānanda, Maitreya, and others", so that after his entering nirvāṇa without remainder they may well uphold and practise them, teach and show them, benefit beings, and 「無令謬錯」 tr. "let there be no error"! The matter entrusted raises both paths together—the path of emptiness is the life of wisdom, the path of merit is the provisions; after the Buddha's extinction the Dharma is spread by people, and in the two words ‘entrusting well’ lies the Tathāgata's deep concern for what comes after him.
44. Explaining bringing peace and security to many beings—to those who cling to permanence teach impermanence, like taking bitter medicine. The treatise-author explains the causes and conditions of the entrusting well that the Buddha speaks of: the bodhisattvas arouse the mind of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi. 「安穩多眾生」 tr. "Bringing peace and security to many beings": all beings are immeasurable, boundless, asaṃkhyeya, and none but the Buddha can count and know them; those who gain benefit from the Buddha cannot be counted, and so they are called many. 「安穩」 tr. "Peace and security": 「眾生著常,教無常;著樂者,教苦;著實者,教空;著我者,教無我」 tr. "beings cling to permanence—teach impermanence; to those who cling to pleasure, teach suffering; to those who cling to the real, teach emptiness; to those who cling to self, teach non-self"—things such as these are called peace and security. When ordinary people hear this, though at the time they do not like or delight in it, over a long time they extinguish their afflictions and gain the bliss of peace and security; 「如服苦藥,當時雖苦,後得除患」 tr. "like taking bitter medicine: though it is bitter at the time, afterwards one is rid of the sickness". Peace and security is not a comfort that follows feeling; it is a cure that pulls out the root—all four teachings go against ordinary feeling and accord with the real mark, and the bitter mouthful is exactly where peace and security come from.
45. Explaining gaining happiness and abundant benefit—the differences of benefit in three periods. The treatise-author explains 「無量眾生得樂」 tr. "letting immeasurable beings gain happiness": when a bodhisattva seeks prajñā and has not yet accomplished it, he 「以今世、後世樂利益眾生」 tr. "benefits beings with the happiness of this life and of later lives", as the Bodhisattva Jātaka Sūtra says; if he has gained prajñā and already cut off the afflictions, he also benefits beings with worldly happiness and world-transcending happiness; 「若得無上道時,但以出世間樂利益眾生」 tr. "when he gains the unsurpassed path, he benefits beings only with world-transcending happiness". 「安樂、饒益」 tr. "Giving ease and abundant benefit" means that only out of a mind of pity does he give ease and abundant benefit; 「饒者,多利益天、人;餘道中饒益少故不說」 tr. "‘abundant’ means that he greatly benefits gods and humans; in the other destinies the abundant benefit is small, so it is not mentioned". Three stages, three happinesses: not yet having attained the path, he gives worldly happiness; having gained prajñā, he bestows both worldly and world-transcending; having become a Buddha, he gives purely world-transcending happiness—the grade of benefiting others turns deeper according to the position of one's own realisation.
46. A broad explanation of the four means of gathering—kind speech and beneficial action each have two kinds; shared endeavour means sharing in what they practise. The treatise-author explains that 「利益事」 tr. "the matters of benefit" are namely the four means of gathering: gathering beings by the two kinds, the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma. 「愛語」 tr. "Kind speech" has two kinds: 「一者、隨意愛語,二者、隨其所愛法為說」 tr. "first, kind speech that follows their wishes; second, speaking to them according to the dharma they love"—before attaining the path, he pities beings, breaks down his own arrogance, and speaks the Dharma as they wish; having attained the path, he speaks according to the dharma by which each should be delivered, as for a rich man of haughty mind he praises giving, whereas if he praised keeping morality and disparaged breaking morality, that man's mind would not be pleased; he speaks the Dharma according to what is fitting. 「利益」 tr. "Beneficial action" also has two kinds: first, he speaks the Dharma for benefit in this life and benefit in later lives, and by the Dharma manages livelihood and diligently cultivates beneficial affairs; second, 「未信教令信,破戒令持戒,寡識令多聞,不施者令布施,癡者教智慧」 tr. "those without faith he teaches to have faith, those who break morality he has keep morality, those of little learning he makes learned, those who do not give he has give, the deluded he teaches wisdom". 「同事」 tr. "Shared endeavour" means teaching and transforming beings, having them practise wholesome dharmas and sharing in what they practise—「菩薩善心,眾生惡心,能化其惡,令同己善」 tr. "the bodhisattva has a good mind and beings have evil minds; he can transform their evil and make it the same as his own goodness". The essential point of the four means of gathering lies in following the capacity: speech follows what they love, benefit follows what they lack, endeavour shares in what they practise.
47. The four means of gathering concluded and the extension of practising oneself and teaching others—entrusting well out of kindness and compassion, not out of loving attachment. The treatise-author concludes: the bodhisattva gathers beings by the four kinds and has them abide in the ten wholesome paths; this is the broad explanation of the meaning of the four means of gathering. Of the two gifts, the gift of Dharma is foremost; speaking the Dharma according to what they delight in is foremost in kind speech; having them practise the ten wholesome paths lets them gain long life, and among the benefits of all precious things 「法利最勝」 tr. "the benefit of the Dharma is supreme"; in shared endeavour, sharing in the practice of wholesome dharmas is superior. Someone says: the later practising the ten wholesome paths oneself and the rest is the fourth, the meaning of sharing, and so it says that he himself practises the ten wholesome paths and also teaches others to practise them. 「自行初禪,亦教他行」 tr. "He himself practises the first dhyāna and also teaches others to practise it"—the first dhyāna and the rest are 「同離欲,同持戒,是故名相攝;相攝故,漸漸能以三乘法度」 tr. "the same in leaving desire, the same in keeping morality, and therefore they are called gathering one another; because they gather one another, step by step one can deliver by the dharma of the three vehicles". Because of prajñā he lets beings gain a share of prajñā, namely gaining srota-āpanna and the rest, 「方便力故自不證」 tr. "by the power of skilful means himself not realising them"; he teaches immeasurable asaṃkhyeya bodhisattvas to abide in the six perfections, and so on up to himself turning the wheel of the Dharma and also teaching others to turn the wheel of the Dharma. At the end it returns to the mind of entrusting: 「是故我以慈悲心故善付是菩薩事,不以愛著故。」 tr. "Therefore I entrust well these affairs of the bodhisattvas out of a mind of kindness and compassion, not out of loving attachment." The single-word verdict between kindness and compassion and loving attachment is exactly why the entrusting well is well.
Do Not Misread
Do not read ‘faith and disparagement both come from former lives’ as a doctrine of fixed destiny. The sūtra text says that those who can have faith planted the roots of virtue long ago, and that those who disparage also disparaged in former lives; this makes clear the momentum of cause and result continuing, not that nothing can be done in this life; where the treatise-author explains, he states plainly that the reason for unbelief is 「不久行功德,則著心堅固、信力微弱」 tr. "not having long practised merit, the attached mind is firm and the power of faith feeble"—the attached mind can be broken, merit can be accumulated, and the density of wet wool is accumulated precisely strand by strand. If one reads it as the root of faith fixed by heaven and the one who disparages beyond saving, then the question and answer about hearing prajñā again after finishing the penalty of hell all become empty words.
Do not read ‘not abiding, not training’ as abandoning cultivation. The Buddha says that not abiding in form is training in prajñā, and 「若不習色,是名習色」 tr. "if he does not train in form, this is called training in form"; the treatise-author distinguishes it in two layers: the training that is negated is 「取色相,若常、若無常等」 tr. "grasping at the mark of form, as permanent, as impermanent, and so on", and the training that is accomplished is the wholesome dharmas' 「積習純厚」 tr. "accumulating habit pure and thick" and 「能習色等諸法實相」 tr. "being able to train in the real mark of form and all dharmas"—what is negated is grasping at marks, not the six perfections and the myriad practices. Of the six perfections the sūtra text says directly, 「不住禪波羅蜜中,為習禪波羅蜜」 tr. "not abiding in dhyānapāramitā is training in dhyānapāramitā"; the word ‘train’ is never let go from beginning to end.
Do not read 「不應在新發意菩薩前說」 tr. "it should not be spoken before bodhisattvas who have newly aroused the mind" as prajñā having a secret. The reason for not speaking it is to protect their root of faith—hearing the deep Dharma, the mind sinks and gives rise to disparagement, and one 「種三惡道業」 tr. "plants the karma of the three evil destinies"; this is to protect people, not to begrudge the Dharma; and the treatise-author states plainly that Śāriputra 「非定心說甚深,得佛意趣,為人故說甚深」 tr. "does not speak of the very deep with a fixed mind; he has grasped the Buddha's intent, and speaks of the very deep for the sake of people". Depth and shallowness have no fixed mark in the first place, as water is deep to a small child and shallow to a grown man; speaking of shallow and deep according to capacity, and the Dharma-substance having no deep or shallow—each of the two statements has its own place.
Do not read the verification of the four similes as a guarantee that hearing the sūtra ensures the prediction. What the four similes verify is the person who 「受持、讀、誦乃至正憶念、如說行」 tr. "receives and upholds it, reads it, recites it, and so on up to rightly recollecting it and practising as it is taught"—the fitting of every simile to the Dharma carries this whole string of practice and upholding; the treatise-author's simile of the swallowed hook likewise says that one who 「深信樂般若波羅蜜」 tr. "deeply believes in and delights in prajñāpāramitā" will not long abide in birth and death. One hearing that reaches the ears is the sign of a cause from former lives; the nearness of the prediction depends on the practice after hearing; to read the prior signs as sufficient signs is precisely the conceit of mistaking the symptom for the realised result.
Bearing on Practice
By hearing the Dharma, verify for oneself the causes of former lives; by practice and upholding, make for oneself the causes to come. This unit teaches a kind of looking back: that today one can hear prajñā and not be startled or terrified lets one know that in former lives one once asked and once practised; if today on hearing it the mind resists, there is also no need to give up on oneself—the attached mind firm and the power of faith feeble is a symptom, not a verdict; practise the six perfections one matter at a time, and dry wool will of itself become wet wool. The single thought of joy or the single thought of doubt and regret at the moment of hearing the Dharma is the report card of one's own lessons from former lives; read it rightly, and then make up the lessons.
In every method of practice, examine the abiding in marks. In daily practice of giving, sitting in meditation, reciting and reading, do the outward matters as they are, but constantly ask oneself: am I abiding within this dharma—relying on giving as what I am able to do, clinging to meditative absorption as what I have gained? The measure of the sūtra text is extremely simple: 「不得色可住可習處」 tr. "one does not find in form a place where one can abide or train"; whenever one feels there is some result of practice where one can settle oneself, that is abiding; practise without abiding, and the practice is pure. Searching through the three times is a ready-made method of contemplation: what has been done has ceased, what has not been done does not exist, what is being done does not stop—where is there to abide?
When startlement and terror appear, recognise the doubt about annihilation. The treatise-author draws the mind-mark of the one who has newly aroused the mind: 「若受一切空法,我云何當墮斷滅中?若不受者,佛所說法,何可不受!」 tr. "If I receive the dharma that all is empty, how shall I not fall into annihilation? If I do not receive it—it is the Dharma spoken by the Buddha; how can I not receive it!" When on hearing the Dharma of emptiness one loses one's footing, able neither to advance nor retreat, first recognise that this is exactly the pass foretold in the sūtra; there is no need for shame, and one must not disparage—better to keep the doubt and diligently practise the six perfections than to give rise to disparagement with a fixed mind; one word of disparagement completes the karma, and for a long, long time it is hard to attain the unsurpassed path.
Take the prior signs for one's peace, and weariness of habit for one's verification. Midway on the path there is often the anxiety of not knowing where one has come to, and the four similes teach one to recognise the signposts: being able to give rise to joy in the scrolls of the prajñā sūtra and to receive and uphold them, gradually finding the pleasures of the world grow pale (weary of her former habits), seeing the afflictions drop away like old leaves—all are signs that the town is not far; to recognise them is to have the 「心得安隱」 tr. "mind gain peace and security", not fearing the danger of bandits, evil insects, hunger, or thirst. Again, to practise one dharma oneself is to teach others one dharma; the four means of gathering follow the capacity: speech chooses what they love, benefit supplies what they lack, endeavour shares in what they practise—out of kindness and compassion, not out of loving attachment: this is gathering others and also purifying oneself.
Further Resonances
The First Part, a single unit of three sūtra passages and three treatise passages, is the section of Praise of Practising in Faith that establishes faith. Sūtra ① establishes, from one thought of Śakra, the causes of faith in former lives—those whose ears prajñā reaches made merit in former lives, and the two roads of faith and disparagement both come from former lives; Śakra worships prajñā and the Buddha confirms it: to worship prajñā is to worship omniscience, and for all the fruits and all the virtues one should train in prajñā. Sūtra ② turns into the gate of practice—not abiding in form is training in prajñā, not training in form is called training in form, form in the three times is unfindable; the three praises of very deep, hard to fathom, and immeasurable, while the mark of the very deep is not form, so that even the mark of depth is not practised; the very deep Dharma should not be spoken before those who have newly aroused the mind, and to protect their root of faith is to protect their awakening. Sūtra ③ establishes the verification of faith—one who has not received the prediction yet can have faith will receive the prediction before long; practising the six perfections in a dream, the prior signs on the dangerous road, the sea where the land is level, the old leaves of the spring tree, the woman with child—the four similes, together with the fish that has swallowed the hook, all make clear that getting to hear prajñā is itself the prior sign of receiving the prediction; at the end, entrusting well the affairs of the bodhisattvas, the four means of gathering and the ten wholesome paths, practising oneself and teaching others and so on up to turning the wheel of the Dharma, out of kindness and compassion, not out of loving attachment. Faith has its cause, its practice, its verification, and its entrusting—the three Chinese characters rendered here as ‘praise of practising in faith’ have their substance established in the First Part. As for what the marks of fully practising prajñā are, the praise of the inconceivable, the guarding against hindrances and the deeds of Māra, the buddhas seeing with the Buddha-eye, knowing, and keeping in mind those who uphold the sūtra, and the prediction for the beings of the north in the age of the Dharma's end—the Last Part of this chapter goes on to unfold them; they are not anticipated here.