大智度論 隨喜迴向品Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · Rejoicing and Dedication

心要Essence

這一品換了說話的人。前三品都是佛與帝釋對答,秤供養般若的福;這一品開卷,是彌勒菩薩向須菩提說:有菩薩「隨喜福德,與一切眾生共之,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以無所得故」,這福「最上、第一、最妙、無上、無與等」。為什麼一念隨喜能勝過聲聞、辟支佛乃至一切眾生的布施持戒修定?因為他們的福「為自調、為自淨、為自度」——持戒自調、修禪自淨、智慧自度,是各自了各自的事;菩薩的隨喜卻「為調一切眾生、為淨一切眾生、為度一切眾生故起」。論主說得親切:隨喜是「不勞身、口業作諸功德,但以心方便見他修福,隨而歡喜」——見人行善,心裡真歡喜一念,這一念因為載著一切眾生,就比獨善其身的萬行更重。連「與一切眾生共之」也交代得老實:福德之體給不出去,「而果報可與」——成佛後的說法、光明、碎身舍利,都是拿福德的果報還給眾生;「善法體不可與人,今直以無畏、無惱施與眾生用」。

可是須菩提隨即用畢竟空把這件事逼到絕處。你隨喜的是十方無量滅度諸佛從初發心到法盡之間的一切善根——那些佛久已滅度,善根久已滅盡,你取著相去緣念迴向,「如所念可得不」?彌勒答得乾脆:「若善男子取相,不得如所念。」須菩提再逼:既然「諸緣、諸事無所有」,取相迴向,豈不是「無常謂常」,墮入想顛倒、心顛倒、見顛倒?那麼到底「何等是緣?何等是事?何等是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?何等是善根?何等是隨喜心迴向」?這一串問,把一件人人會做的善行問成了全品的公案:隨喜迴向若離不開取相,就是憶想分別;若一切皆空,又拿什麼隨喜、向哪裡迴向?

答案分兩頭。一頭是機:久行六波羅蜜、多供養諸佛、與善知識相隨、善學自相空法的人做得到——論主打比方,「譬如鐵雖堅䩕,入鑪則柔軟,隨作何器」,久行的心入了般若鑪,才能不取相而仍能迴向;也正因如此,這深法「不應為新學菩薩說」,如「鳥子,羽翼未成,不可逼令高翔」,新發意者先教取相隨喜,漸得方便力。一頭是法:用心隨喜迴向時,就知道「是心盡、滅、變、離」——念諸佛及僧而「不生佛想、不生僧想」,迴向心裡「亦不生心想」;心隨無常門滅入法性,「法性中無有分別是心、是非心,是佛、是弟子,是善根、是無上道」,這樣迴向,才是正迴向、真迴向。論主一句判語收住兩邊:「有相是一邊,無相是一邊,離是二邊行中道,是諸佛實相。」不是不迴向,是於不取相中迴向。

品的下半,把邪正之判說到見血。取相迴向,「譬如美食雜毒」——好色好香,愚癡人食之歡喜,「飯欲消時,受若死、若死等苦」。論主逐句配釋:食是隨喜福德,毒是取相而生的愛見煩惱;好色是人王天王的福樂,好香是名譽富貴;那位愚癡人,正是「新發意取相著心菩薩」——福受得越美,無常破壞時死得越苦,失財是死等,失智慧命才是死。更嚴重的是,不諦受、不諦取相、不諦誦讀、不解義,還教別人取相和合迴向,「則為謗佛,不隨佛教、不隨法說」。那正迴向是什麼?只有一條路:「如諸佛所知無上智慧,是諸善根相、是諸善根性,我亦如是隨喜;如諸佛所知,我亦如是迴向。」自己的分別靠不住,就依佛所知的實相隨喜——「譬如射地,無不著時;若射餘物,或著、或不著」。射地必中,依諸佛所知隨喜必得實隨喜;用自己的餘道去隨喜,或中或不中。

最後佛親自出場,把秤加到頂。三千大千世界眾生行十善、得四禪五神通,不如一念「於諸善根心不著」的迴向;乃至恒河沙世界眾生恒河沙劫的供養,也不如——因為色乃至一切種智皆「不繫三界」、不名三世,「若法無生則無法,無法中不可迴向」,取相有所得的迴向是邪迴向,諸佛不稱譽。四天王天乃至阿迦尼吒天都來讚歎:這才是「最大迴向」,不墮二法。須菩提問:云何名隨喜最上?佛答:念三世諸法「不取不捨、不念非不念、不得非不得」,然後作是念——布施與解脫等,戒忍精進禪智與解脫等,色受想行識與解脫等,乃至十方諸佛、諸佛滅度、一切法相皆與解脫等,「我以是諸善根相隨喜功德迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,亦與解脫等,不生不滅故」。論主結出五對差別:有所得的福有量、有盡、雜毒、隨生死、或進或退;無所得的隨喜無量、無盡、無毒、隨涅槃、必疾作佛。凡夫求世間樂,二乘求涅槃樂,菩薩求佛樂——一念隨喜而與解脫等,勝過無量劫有所得的苦行。這就是隨喜迴向品的心:把最容易的一念歡喜,放到最徹底的無所得裡,它就成了最上、第一、最妙、無上、無與等的福。

In this chapter the speaker changes. The three preceding chapters were all the Buddha answering Śakra, weighing the merit of making offerings to prajñā; as this chapter opens, it is the bodhisattva Maitreya speaking to Subhūti: there is a bodhisattva who ‘rejoices in merit, shares it with all beings, and dedicates it to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, with nothing to be attained’, and this merit is ‘supreme, foremost, most wondrous, unsurpassed, and without equal’. Why can one thought of rejoicing surpass the giving, the upholding of morality, and the cultivation of concentration of the śrāvakas, the pratyekabuddhas, and even all beings? Because their merit is ‘for their own taming, their own purification, their own deliverance’—upholding morality tames oneself, cultivating dhyāna purifies oneself, wisdom delivers oneself; each settles his own affair; but the bodhisattva's rejoicing ‘arises for the taming of all beings, the purification of all beings, the deliverance of all beings’. The treatise-author puts it intimately: rejoicing is ‘without labouring with the karma of body or speech to make merits, but merely, by the skilful means of the mind, seeing another cultivate merit and rejoicing accordingly’—seeing someone do good and truly rejoicing in one thought of the mind, that single thought, because it carries all beings, weighs more than the ten thousand practices of one who perfects himself alone. Even ‘sharing it with all beings’ is accounted for honestly: the substance of merit cannot be given away, ‘but its result can be given’—the preaching of the Dharma after becoming a buddha, the light, the relics of the body broken into pieces, all are the results of merit given back to beings; ‘the substance of a wholesome dharma cannot be given to another; here one simply gives beings fearlessness and freedom from vexation to use’.

But Subhūti at once drives this matter to the wall with ultimate emptiness. What you rejoice in is all the roots of goodness of the immeasurable buddhas of the ten directions who have passed into extinction, from their first arousing of the mind until the Dharma's end—those buddhas passed into extinction long ago, those roots of goodness were long ago exhausted; if you grasp at marks to think of them and dedicate them, ‘can it be found as it is thought of?’ Maitreya answers crisply: ‘If a good man grasps at marks, it cannot be found as it is thought of.’ Subhūti presses again: since ‘the objects and the matters are without anything existent’, is dedication that grasps at marks not ‘taking the impermanent for permanent’, falling into the inversion of perception, the inversion of mind, the inversion of view? Then what, after all, ‘is the object? what is the matter? what is anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi? what is the root of goodness? what is the mind of rejoicing and dedication?’ This string of questions turns a wholesome act that anyone can perform into the great case of the whole chapter: if rejoicing and dedication cannot part from grasping at marks, then it is recollection, imagining, and discrimination; if everything is empty, then with what does one rejoice, and to what does one dedicate?

The answer comes from two sides. One side is the capacity: those who have long practised the six perfections, made many offerings to the buddhas, kept company with good friends, and learned well the dharma of the emptiness of specific marks can do it—the treatise-author's comparison is that ‘iron, though hard and tough, once it enters the furnace becomes soft and can be made into any vessel’; only a mind long in practice, having entered the furnace of prajñā, can dedicate without grasping at marks; and for just this reason this deep Dharma ‘should not be taught to bodhisattvas new to the training’, for they are like ‘fledglings whose wings are not yet grown, who must not be forced to fly high’; those who have newly aroused the mind are first taught to rejoice while grasping at marks, and gradually gain the power of skilful means. The other side is the Dharma: when one uses the mind to rejoice and dedicate, one knows that ‘this mind is exhausted, ceased, changed, and departed’—thinking of the buddhas and the saṅgha one ‘does not give rise to the thought of a buddha, does not give rise to the thought of a saṅgha’, and in the dedicating mind ‘one does not give rise to the thought of a mind either’; the mind, following the gate of impermanence, ceases and enters the nature of dharmas, and ‘in the nature of dharmas there is no discrimination of this being mind and this not being mind, this being the Buddha and this the disciple, this being the root of goodness and this the unsurpassed path’; to dedicate in this way is right dedication, true dedication. The treatise-author's single ruling holds both sides together: ‘Having marks is one extreme; being without marks is one extreme; leaving these two extremes and walking the middle way is the real mark of the buddhas.’ It is not that one does not dedicate; it is that one dedicates within not grasping at marks.

The lower half of the chapter states the judgement between wrong and right until it draws blood. Dedication that grasps at marks is ‘like fine food mixed with poison’—of good colour and good fragrance, a fool eats it with delight, and ‘when the food is about to be digested, he suffers death or what is equal to death’. The treatise-author matches the similes phrase by phrase: the food is the merit of rejoicing, the poison is the afflictions of craving and views born of grasping at marks; the good colour is the blessed pleasures of human kings and heavenly kings, the good fragrance is fame, wealth, and rank; and that fool is precisely ‘the bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind, grasps at marks, and has an attached mind’—the finer the blessings received, the more bitter the death when impermanence breaks them; to lose one's wealth is what is equal to death, to lose the life of wisdom is death itself. Graver still: one who does not truly receive, does not truly grasp the marks, does not truly recite and read, does not understand the meaning, and yet teaches others to grasp at marks, join together, and dedicate, ‘thereby slanders the Buddha, does not follow the Buddha's teaching, does not speak according to the Dharma’. Then what is right dedication? There is only one road: ‘As the buddhas know with their unsurpassed wisdom the mark of these roots of goodness and the nature of these roots of goodness, so too do I rejoice; as the buddhas know, so too do I dedicate.’ One's own discrimination is not to be relied on, so one rejoices according to the real mark as the buddhas know it—‘like shooting at the ground, which never fails to hit; if one shoots at other things, one may hit or may not hit’. Shooting at the ground one is sure to hit; rejoicing according to what the buddhas know one is sure to obtain true rejoicing; rejoicing by one's own other paths, one may hit or may not.

Finally the Buddha himself comes forth and loads the scales to the top. That the beings of the three-thousand great-thousand world should practise the ten wholesome paths and attain the four dhyānas and the five supernormal powers does not equal one thought of dedication ‘with the mind not attached to the roots of goodness’; even the offerings of beings in worlds as many as the sands of the Ganges through kalpas as many as the sands of the Ganges do not equal it—because form and so on up to omniscience of all kinds are all ‘not bound to the three realms’ and are not named by the three times; ‘if a dharma is unarisen then there is no dharma, and within no dharma there can be no dedication’; dedication that grasps at marks with something to be attained is wrong dedication, which the buddhas do not praise. From the heavens of the Four Heavenly Kings up to the Akaniṣṭha heaven the gods come to praise it: this is ‘the greatest dedication’, which does not fall into dual dharmas. Subhūti asks: what is called the supreme rejoicing? The Buddha answers: to think of the dharmas of the three times as ‘neither grasped nor relinquished, neither thought of nor not thought of, neither found nor not found’, and then to think thus—giving is equal to liberation; morality, patience, vigour, dhyāna, and wisdom are equal to liberation; form, feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness are equal to liberation; and so on up to the buddhas of the ten directions, the buddhas' passing into extinction, and the marks of all dharmas are all equal to liberation; ‘I, with the merit of rejoicing according to the marks of these roots of goodness, dedicate it to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, and this too is equal to liberation, because it neither arises nor ceases’. The treatise-author concludes with five pairs of difference: merit with something to be attained is measurable, exhaustible, mixed with poison, follows birth and death, and now advances and now retreats; rejoicing with nothing to be attained is immeasurable, inexhaustible, without poison, follows nirvāṇa, and is sure to make a buddha quickly. Ordinary people seek the pleasure of the world, the two vehicles seek the pleasure of nirvāṇa, the bodhisattva seeks the pleasure of the Buddha—one thought of rejoicing that is equal to liberation surpasses the ascetic practices of immeasurable kalpas with something to be attained. This is the heart of the chapter on rejoicing and dedication: place the easiest single thought of gladness into the most thoroughgoing nothing to be attained, and it becomes the merit that is supreme, foremost, most wondrous, unsurpassed, and without equal.

義疏 · 總說Exposition · Overview

總說

〈隨喜迴向品〉開篇,說者換了人。前數品皆是佛與釋提桓因對答,此品卻由彌勒菩薩告慧命須菩提立宗:有菩薩「隨喜福德,與一切眾生共之,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以無所得故」,比之聲聞、辟支佛及一切眾生的布施、持戒、修定、隨喜,「其福最上、第一、最妙、無上、無與等者」。所以者何?二乘與眾生之福,「為自調、為自淨、為自度」而已;菩薩隨喜迴向,為調一切眾生、淨一切眾生、度一切眾生故起。須菩提隨即以畢竟空難之:所隨喜者是十方無量世界已滅度佛,從初發心至法盡中間的諸善根,一切和合隨喜迴向——過去佛久已滅度,取相迴向,如所念可得不?彌勒答:「取相,不得如所念」。須菩提進逼:諸緣諸事既無所有,取相迴向「將無顛倒」?乃至連珠五問——「何等是緣?何等是事?」何等是菩提、是善根、是隨喜心迴向?全品便在這一問之下展開:隨喜之福何以最上,正迴向與邪迴向以何為界。品名〈隨喜迴向品〉,眼目在隨喜與迴向合說為一法——隨喜是緣他善而起的心,迴向是持此心趣無上道;此一心之福所以壓過身口勤作的一切福德,關捩全在「以無所得故」。

之上三番,把「但以心隨喜」立起來,又把「云何不墮顛倒」逼出來。經①即上述立宗與畢竟空之難。論①先明說者之義:「先七品中,佛命須菩提令說般若,中間帝釋多問、多說功德事」,今彌勒順佛本意,還令須菩提因隨喜法廣說般若;又抑帝釋自多之情——「菩薩但以心隨喜,則勝聲聞、辟支佛、一切眾生布施等及諸無漏功德,何況華香、供養經卷等」。繼而釋隨喜福德義:「不勞身、口業作諸功德,但以心方便見他修福,隨而歡喜」;若離福德,人與畜生同行三事;修福之人「譬如熱時,清涼滿月,無不樂仰」;有漏無漏通名福德,福德是菩薩根本,人王天王乃至諸佛皆從中生。共一切眾生者,福德體不可與人,而果報可與,以果中說因,故言「福德與眾生共」;自調自淨自度,配戒定慧、配八正道而釋;實不度一切眾生而言度者,如大火常有燒力,薪不近故不得燒。末釋緣、事之名,並判凡夫三顛倒、學人二顛倒。經②彌勒答難:久行六波羅蜜、多供養諸佛、種善根、與善知識相隨、善學自相空法者,於是緣是事不取相而能迴向,以不二法非不二法乃至不生不滅法;且明此深義「不應為新學菩薩說」,恐其少許信樂清淨心皆亡失;又自設心盡滅變離、二心不俱之難。論②以喻答之:鐵雖堅䩕,入鑪則柔,久行之心調柔故能無相隨喜;「譬如鳥子,羽翼未成,不可逼令高翔;六翮成就,則能遠飛」,故新發意先教取相隨喜,漸得方便力;心念念盡滅,入諸法實相,無有分別是心是緣是事,是為正迴向。經③帝釋插問:新發意菩薩聞是事將無驚怖?須菩提為成彌勒所說,答以不受般若、多信解諸空、常隨善知識、聞魔事不增不減;新發意於過去諸佛「斷生死道」等功德及四種福田善根,一切和合隨喜迴向;彌勒更問云何不墮想心見三顛倒,須菩提答:念諸佛及僧而不生佛想、僧想、善根想,用是心迴向亦不生心想;心盡滅相,所迴向處法亦盡滅相、自性空,能如是知,是名「真迴向」;乃至「無有法能迴向法」,一切法自性空故。論③釋帝釋重問之因緣,逐句釋斷道、棄重擔、滅聚落刺諸讚歎語,明心「入無常門,到法性中」,法性中無有分別;又答初心後心生滅之難,收於知滅知空之真迴向、無所作故無有法能迴向法之正迴向。

之下兩番,把正邪迴向之界說到底,再以校量與諸天之讚收成全品的果。經④轉入離相:所起福德離五眾、十二入、十八界,般若乃至十八不共法皆是離相;隨喜福德自性離,諸佛離佛性,善根離善根性,應如是行離相般若波羅蜜。於過去滅度佛善根欲迴向者,應作是念:如諸佛滅度相,諸善根相亦如是,我用心迴向,是心相亦如是——如是迴向,不墮三顛倒。彌勒問:不取相云何能迴向?須菩提答:所學般若中「應有般若波羅蜜方便力」;般若中諸佛不可得、善根不可得、迴向心亦不可得;取相分別而迴向,諸佛所不許——「譬如美食雜毒」,好色好香為人所貪,愚癡人食之歡喜,「飯欲消時,受若死、若死等苦」;不諦受、不諦取相、不諦誦讀、不解中義而教他人取相隨喜迴向,則為謗佛;正迴向者,「如諸佛所知無上智慧」,是諸善根相性,我亦如是隨喜、如是迴向。論④釋之:如過去佛入無餘涅槃,無相無戲論,性常寂滅,福德及迴向心亦如是;「有相是一邊,無相是一邊,離是二邊行中道,是諸佛實相」;福德離般若不得迴向者,一法實而不誑,不誑道即是般若;過去佛空無而我憶想分別,即是大失;雜毒食喻逐句配釋——食是隨喜福德,毒是取相所生愛見煩惱,好色是人天福樂,好香是名譽勢力,愚癡人是新發意取相著心菩薩;若死若死等,兩重釋之;末出全品最亮的一喻:「譬如射地,無不著時;若射餘物,或著、或不著」——如諸佛所知隨喜,如射地無不著。經⑤更進一層:色乃至常捨行諸法「不繫欲界、不繫色界、不繫無色界」,不繫法者不名三世;「若法無生則無法,無法中不可迴向」——如是迴向則無雜毒;取相得法迴向是名邪迴向,諸佛所不稱譽,不能具足六波羅蜜乃至不能得菩提。佛於此親自印可,讚須菩提「善哉!善哉!如汝所為,為作佛事」,為諸菩薩說所應迴向法,以無相、無得、無出乃至法性、如、實際故;繼以三重校量——三千大千眾生行十善四禪五通、皆作須陀洹乃至辟支佛而人盡壽供養、皆發菩提心而恒沙眾生恒沙劫供養——皆不如於諸善根心不著迴向;四天王天乃至阿迦尼吒天雲集讚歎菩薩「最大迴向」,以方便力故、無所得故、無相法故、無覺法故,「不墮二法」;佛告諸天:取相有所得之和合隨喜,比之無所得、無二法、無相法之最上隨喜,功德百千億倍不及;須菩提問云何隨喜最上,佛答:於三世諸法不取不捨、不念非不念、不得非不得,如如相、法性、法住、法位,我亦如是隨喜迴向;復教以「布施與解脫等」乃至一切諸法相皆與解脫等之隨喜觀,「不生不滅故」,成就是隨喜功德者「當疾得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」。論⑤收束全品:色出三界即是色實相,無生故無所有,是名無雜毒、無相無得迴向;「菩薩禮佛有三品:一者、悔過品,二者、隨喜迴向品,三者、勸請諸佛品」,本品正是三品之一的廣說;無相有三種——「假名相」「法相」「無相相」,離三種相故名無相,由無相而無所得、無出、無垢無淨,一路同於法性、如、實際;三番問答釋諸天多少之故、最上迴向之略說(「果報常無盡故」)、諸法云何與解脫等(慧眼觀諸法皆虛妄,「唯涅槃為實」,故「解脫為貴,上智慧貴解脫」);末以五對差別判之——有所得法無量劫行六度,不及無所得法但以心隨喜:先有量今無量、先有盡今無盡、先雜毒今無毒、先隨生死今隨涅槃、先不定今必疾作佛。

全品經文與論釋各五番,經、論相間而進,同在卷六十一之內,依第三番論釋之末、第四番經文之首,分作之上、之下兩分弧。之上收前三番——彌勒立宗與畢竟空之難、緣事之辨與顛倒之判、深義不為新學說、鳥子六翮之喻、新發意云何正迴向、心入無常門到法性中;之下收後兩番——離相與自性離、雜毒食喻與射地喻、不繫三界無法可迴向、佛讚作佛事與三重校量、諸天最大迴向之讚、與解脫等之隨喜觀、五對差別,訖於四種人之判。之上鋪的是『但以心隨喜,何以福最上』與『無相之法,云何隨喜』的往復,之下鋪的是正邪迴向之界如何落到雜毒與射地兩喻、再由佛親自印可而收於最上隨喜。

因此,讀每一番問答時,至少可問三層。其一,這一番的難處卡在哪一重——是過去佛久滅、取相「不得如所念」的所緣之難?是心念念盡滅、二心不俱的能緣之難?還是法本無生、「無法中不可迴向」的法體之難?其二,答之者以何判正邪——取相即雜毒、即謗佛、即墮三顛倒;不取相即如諸佛所知、即射地無不著、即不墮二法。判準總是一句「以無所得故」。其三,論主以何等譬喻接引深淺兩機——對新發意,是鳥子六翮、鐵入鑪之漸;對久行者,是雜毒食之誡、射地之決;乃至大火薪不近不燒、渧水墮熱鐵即滅,皆各有所當。順著這五番對答讀下去,終會落在同一處:隨喜迴向之福所以最上第一,不在所緣之廣、所念之多,而在能隨喜者於佛、於善根、於自心一無所取——如諸佛所知隨喜,如射地無不著。

依原論次序讀下去

Overview

As "Rejoicing and Dedication" opens, the speaker changes. In the preceding several chapters it was always the Buddha and Śakra Devānām Indra answering one another; in this chapter, however, it is the bodhisattva Maitreya who addresses the venerable Subhūti and sets up the thesis: there is a bodhisattva who 「隨喜福德,與一切眾生共之,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以無所得故」 tr. "rejoices in merit, shares it with all beings, and dedicates it to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, with nothing to be attained"; compared with the giving, the upholding of morality, the cultivation of concentration, and the rejoicing of the śrāvakas, the pratyekabuddhas, and all beings, 「其福最上、第一、最妙、無上、無與等者」 tr. "this merit is supreme, foremost, most wondrous, unsurpassed, and without equal". Why is this so? The merit of the two vehicles and of beings is only 「為自調、為自淨、為自度」 tr. "for their own taming, for their own purification, for their own deliverance"; the bodhisattva's rejoicing and dedication arises for the sake of taming all beings, purifying all beings, and delivering all beings. Subhūti at once challenges this with ultimate emptiness: what is rejoiced in is the buddhas of the immeasurable worlds of the ten directions who have already passed into extinction, and all the roots of goodness in between, from their first arousing of the mind until the Dharma's end, all brought together, rejoiced in, and dedicated—but the past buddhas passed into extinction long ago; if one dedicates by grasping at marks, can it be found as it is thought of? Maitreya answers: 「取相,不得如所念」 tr. "grasping at marks, it cannot be found as it is thought of". Subhūti presses further: since the objects and the matters are without anything existent, is dedication that grasps at marks not 「將無顛倒」 tr. "surely inverted"? And so on to a string of five questions—「何等是緣?何等是事?」 tr. "What is the object? What is the matter?" What is awakening, what is the root of goodness, what is the mind of rejoicing that dedicates? The whole chapter then unfolds beneath this one question: why the merit of rejoicing is supreme, and by what the boundary between right dedication and wrong dedication is drawn. The chapter is named "Rejoicing and Dedication", and its eye lies in speaking of rejoicing and dedication together as a single dharma—rejoicing is the mind that arises in response to the goodness of others, and dedication is taking this mind toward the unsurpassed path; that the merit of this one mind outweighs all the merits made by the diligent work of body and speech—the pivot lies wholly in 「以無所得故」 tr. "with nothing to be attained".

The three rounds of the First Part set up 「但以心隨喜」 tr. "merely rejoicing with the mind", and then force out the question 「云何不墮顛倒」 tr. "how does one not fall into inversion?". Sūtra round ① is the setting up of the thesis and the challenge from ultimate emptiness described above. Treatise round ① first makes clear the meaning of the change of speakers: 「先七品中,佛命須菩提令說般若,中間帝釋多問、多說功德事」 tr. "in the preceding seven chapters the Buddha commanded Subhūti to speak prajñā, and in between Śakra asked much and spoke much of matters of merit"; now Maitreya, following the Buddha's original intent, again has Subhūti speak widely on prajñā by means of the dharma of rejoicing; he also checks Śakra's feeling of self-importance—「菩薩但以心隨喜,則勝聲聞、辟支佛、一切眾生布施等及諸無漏功德,何況華香、供養經卷等」 tr. "the bodhisattva, merely by rejoicing with the mind, surpasses the giving and so on of the śrāvakas, the pratyekabuddhas, and all beings, and all the merits without outflows—how much more flowers, incense, offerings to the scroll, and the like". It then explains the meaning of the merit of rejoicing: 「不勞身、口業作諸功德,但以心方便見他修福,隨而歡喜」 tr. "without labouring with the karma of body and speech to make merits, but merely, by the skilful means of the mind, seeing another cultivate merit and rejoicing accordingly"; apart from merit, humans and animals alike practise the three things; a person who cultivates merit is 「譬如熱時,清涼滿月,無不樂仰」 tr. "like the cool full moon in hot weather, which there is no one who does not delight in and look up to"; merit with outflows and merit without outflows are alike named merit; merit is the root of the bodhisattva, and human kings, heavenly kings, and even the buddhas are all born from it. As for sharing it with all beings: the substance of merit cannot be given to others, but the result can be given; because the cause is spoken of within the result, it is said 「福德與眾生共」 tr. "merit is shared with beings"; their own taming, their own purification, their own deliverance are explained by matching them to morality, concentration, and wisdom, and to the eightfold right path; as for speaking of delivering when in fact not all beings are delivered, it is like a great fire that always has the power to burn yet cannot burn because the firewood does not come near. At the end it explains the names object and matter, and determines the three inversions of ordinary people and the two inversions of trainees. In sūtra round ② Maitreya answers the challenge: those who have long practised the six perfections, made many offerings to the buddhas, planted roots of goodness, kept company with good friends, and learned well the dharma of the emptiness of specific marks are able, with regard to these objects and these matters, to dedicate without grasping at marks, by way of the non-dual dharma and the not-non-dual dharma, and so on up to the dharma that neither arises nor ceases; he also makes clear that this deep meaning 「不應為新學菩薩說」 tr. "should not be taught to bodhisattvas new to the training", for fear that their slight faith, delight, and pure mind would all be lost; and he himself raises the difficulty that the mind is exhausted, ceased, changed, and departed, and that two minds do not occur together. Treatise round ② answers with similes: iron, though hard and tough, becomes soft when it enters the furnace; the mind long in practice is tamed and pliant, and so can rejoice without marks; 「譬如鳥子,羽翼未成,不可逼令高翔;六翮成就,則能遠飛」 tr. "just as a fledgling whose wings are not yet grown cannot be forced to soar high, but once its six pinions are complete it can fly far"; therefore one who has newly aroused the mind is first taught rejoicing that grasps at marks, and gradually gains the power of skilful means; the mind is exhausted and ceases from thought to thought and enters the real mark of all dharmas, where there is no discrimination of this as the mind, this as the object, this as the matter—this is right dedication. In sūtra round ③ Śakra puts in a question: will a bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind not be alarmed and afraid on hearing this matter? Subhūti, to complete what Maitreya has said, answers with not receiving prajñā, having much faith in and understanding of the emptinesses, always following good friends, and neither increasing nor decreasing on hearing of the deeds of Māra; the one who has newly aroused the mind brings together all the merits of the past buddhas—their 「斷生死道」 tr. "cutting off the path of birth and death" and the rest—and the roots of goodness of the four kinds of fields of merit, rejoices in them, and dedicates them; Maitreya asks further how one does not fall into the three inversions of perception, mind, and view, and Subhūti answers: one thinks of the buddhas and the saṅgha yet does not give rise to the thought of a buddha, the thought of a saṅgha, or the thought of roots of goodness, and in dedicating with this mind does not give rise to the thought of a mind either; the mind has the mark of exhaustion and cessation, and the dharma of the place to which one dedicates likewise has the mark of exhaustion and cessation and is empty of self-nature; to be able to know it thus is called 「真迴向」 tr. "true dedication"; and so on up to 「無有法能迴向法」 tr. "there is no dharma that can dedicate a dharma", because all dharmas are empty of self-nature. Treatise round ③ explains the circumstances of Śakra's renewed question, explains phrase by phrase the words of praise—cutting off the path, laying down the heavy burden, removing the thorn of the village—and makes clear that the mind 「入無常門,到法性中」 tr. "enters the gate of impermanence and arrives within the nature of dharmas", and within the nature of dharmas there is no discrimination; it also answers the difficulty that the earlier mind and the later mind arise and cease, and gathers everything into the true dedication that knows cessation and knows emptiness, and the right dedication in which, because nothing is done, there is no dharma that can dedicate a dharma.

The two rounds of the Last Part carry the boundary between right and wrong dedication through to the end, and then, with the weighing and the praise of the gods, gather up the fruit of the whole chapter. Sūtra round ④ turns to the mark of separation: the merit that arises is apart from the five aggregates, the twelve sense-fields, and the eighteen elements, and prajñā and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas all have the mark of separation; the merit of rejoicing is apart by its self-nature, the buddhas are apart from the buddha-nature, the roots of goodness are apart from the nature of roots of goodness, and one should practise thus the prajñāpāramitā of the mark of separation. One who wishes to dedicate the roots of goodness of the past buddhas who have passed into extinction should think thus: as is the mark of the buddhas' passing into extinction, so too is the mark of the roots of goodness; I dedicate with the mind, and the mark of this mind too is so—dedicating thus, one does not fall into the three inversions. Maitreya asks: without grasping at marks, how can one dedicate? Subhūti answers: in the prajñā one learns 「應有般若波羅蜜方便力」 tr. "there should be the power of skilful means of prajñāpāramitā"; within prajñā the buddhas are unfindable, the roots of goodness are unfindable, and the dedicating mind too is unfindable; dedication that grasps at marks and discriminates is not permitted by the buddhas—「譬如美食雜毒」 tr. "like fine food mixed with poison"; its good colour and good fragrance are craved by people, and a foolish person eats it with delight, but 「飯欲消時,受若死、若死等苦」 tr. "when the food is about to be digested, he suffers the pain of death or of what is equal to death"; one who does not truly receive, does not truly grasp the marks, does not truly recite and read, and does not understand the meaning within, and yet teaches others to rejoice and dedicate by grasping at marks, thereby slanders the Buddha; as for right dedication, 「如諸佛所知無上智慧」 tr. "as the buddhas know with their unsurpassed wisdom" the mark and nature of these roots of goodness, so too do I rejoice, so too do I dedicate. Treatise round ④ explains this: as the past buddhas entered nirvāṇa without remainder, without marks and without idle discourse, their nature forever quiescent, so too are the merit and the dedicating mind; 「有相是一邊,無相是一邊,離是二邊行中道,是諸佛實相」 tr. "having marks is one extreme, being without marks is one extreme; leaving these two extremes and walking the middle way is the real mark of the buddhas"; merit apart from prajñā cannot be dedicated, because one dharma is real and not deceptive, and the undeceiving path is prajñā; that the past buddhas are empty and non-existent and yet I engage in recollection, imagining, and discrimination about them—this is a great loss; the simile of the poisoned food is matched and explained phrase by phrase—the food is the merit of rejoicing, the poison is the afflictions of craving and views born of grasping at marks, the good colour is the blessed pleasures of humans and gods, the good fragrance is fame and power, and the foolish person is the bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind, grasps at marks, and has an attached mind; death, or what is equal to death, is explained in two ways; and at the end comes the brightest simile of the whole chapter: 「譬如射地,無不著時;若射餘物,或著、或不著」 tr. "just as when one shoots at the ground there is no time one does not hit, but if one shoots at other things one may hit or may not hit"—rejoice as the buddhas know, like shooting at the ground, which never fails to hit. Sūtra round ⑤ goes a layer further: form and so on up to the practice of constant equanimity and all dharmas are 「不繫欲界、不繫色界、不繫無色界」 tr. "not bound to the desire realm, not bound to the form realm, not bound to the formless realm", and a dharma that is not bound is not named by the three times; 「若法無生則無法,無法中不可迴向」 tr. "if a dharma is unarisen then there is no dharma, and within no dharma there can be no dedication"—dedicating thus, there is no mixing with poison; dedication that grasps at marks and attains a dharma is called wrong dedication, which the buddhas do not praise, and which cannot fulfil the six perfections and so on up to cannot attain awakening. Here the Buddha himself gives his approval, praising Subhūti, 「善哉!善哉!如汝所為,為作佛事」 tr. "Excellent! Excellent! What you have done is to do the Buddha's work", in that he has spoken for the bodhisattvas the dharma to which one should dedicate, by way of the signless, of non-attainment, of non-emergence, and so on up to the nature of dharmas, suchness, and the limit of reality; there follows a threefold weighing—that the beings of the three-thousand great-thousand world should practise the ten wholesome paths, the four dhyānas, and the five supernormal powers; that they should all become srota-āpanna and so on up to pratyekabuddhas, and a person make offerings to them for his whole life; that they should all arouse the mind of awakening, and beings as many as the sands of the Ganges make offerings for kalpas as many as the sands of the Ganges—none of this equals dedication with a mind not attached to the roots of goodness; from the heavens of the Four Heavenly Kings up to the Akaniṣṭha heaven the gods gather like clouds and praise the bodhisattva's 「最大迴向」 tr. "greatest dedication", which, because of the power of skilful means, with nothing to be attained, because of the signless dharma, because of the dharma without awareness, 「不墮二法」 tr. "does not fall into dual dharmas"; the Buddha tells the gods: rejoicing that grasps at marks, with something to be attained, and brings things together, compared with the supreme rejoicing of nothing to be attained, of non-dual dharmas, of the signless dharma, falls short of it in merit by a hundred thousand koṭi times; Subhūti asks what is the supreme rejoicing, and the Buddha answers: toward the dharmas of the three times, neither grasping nor relinquishing, neither thinking of nor not thinking of, neither finding nor not finding; as are the mark of suchness, the nature of dharmas, the abiding of dharmas, and the position of dharmas, so too do I rejoice and dedicate; and further he teaches the contemplation of rejoicing in which 「布施與解脫等」 tr. "giving is equal to liberation", and so on up to the marks of all dharmas all being equal to liberation, 「不生不滅故」 tr. "because they neither arise nor cease"; one who accomplishes the merit of this rejoicing 「當疾得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "shall quickly attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi". Treatise round ⑤ brings the whole chapter to a close: form going beyond the three realms is itself the real mark of form; because it is unarisen, it is without anything existent—this is called dedication without the mixing of poison, the signless dedication of non-attainment; 「菩薩禮佛有三品:一者、悔過品,二者、隨喜迴向品,三者、勸請諸佛品」 tr. "the bodhisattva's worship of the Buddha has three sections: first, the section on repentance; second, the section on rejoicing and dedication; third, the section on entreating the buddhas", and this chapter is precisely the extended account of one of these three sections; the signless is of three kinds—「假名相」 tr. "the mark of provisional names", 「法相」 tr. "the mark of dharmas", 「無相相」 tr. "the mark of the signless"—and because one is apart from the three kinds of marks it is called signless; from the signless there follow non-attainment, non-emergence, neither stain nor purity, all the way to being the same as the nature of dharmas, suchness, and the limit of reality; three rounds of question and answer explain why some gods come in great numbers and others in few, the brief account of the supreme dedication (「果報常無盡故」 tr. "because its result is forever inexhaustible"), and how all dharmas are equal to liberation (the wisdom-eye contemplates all dharmas as false, 「唯涅槃為實」 tr. "only nirvāṇa is real", and therefore 「解脫為貴,上智慧貴解脫」 tr. "liberation is to be prized; superior wisdom prizes liberation"); at the end it judges with five pairs of difference—practising the six perfections for immeasurable kalpas with dharmas of something to be attained does not equal merely rejoicing with the mind by way of dharmas of nothing to be attained: formerly measurable, now immeasurable; formerly exhaustible, now inexhaustible; formerly mixed with poison, now without poison; formerly following birth and death, now following nirvāṇa; formerly uncertain, now sure to make a buddha quickly.

For the whole chapter the sūtra text and the treatise's explanation each come in five rounds, sūtra and treatise advancing in alternation; all within fascicle sixty-one, the chapter is divided at the end of the treatise's third round of explanation and the head of the fourth round of sūtra text into two arcs, the First Part and the Last Part. The First Part takes in the first three rounds—Maitreya's setting up of the thesis and the challenge from ultimate emptiness, the distinction between object and matter and the determination of the inversions, the deep meaning not taught to those new to the training, the simile of the fledgling's six pinions, how one who has newly aroused the mind dedicates rightly, and the mind entering the gate of impermanence and arriving within the nature of dharmas; the Last Part takes in the latter two rounds—the mark of separation and being apart by self-nature, the simile of the poisoned food and the simile of shooting at the ground, not being bound to the three realms and there being no dharma to dedicate, the Buddha's praise of doing the Buddha's work and the threefold weighing, the gods' praise of the greatest dedication, the contemplation of rejoicing that is equal to liberation, and the five pairs of difference, ending at the judgement of the four kinds of people. What the First Part lays out is the back-and-forth between ‘merely rejoicing with the mind—why is its merit supreme?’ and ‘a signless dharma—how can one rejoice?’; what the Last Part lays out is how the boundary between right and wrong dedication comes to rest in the two similes of the poisoned food and of shooting at the ground, and then, with the Buddha's own approval, is gathered into the supreme rejoicing.

Therefore, in reading each round of question and answer, one can ask at least three layers of questions. First, at which layer does this round's difficulty lodge—is it the difficulty on the side of the object, that the past buddhas are long extinct and that, grasping at marks, 「不得如所念」 tr. "it cannot be found as it is thought of"? Is it the difficulty on the side of the mind that takes the object, that the mind is exhausted and ceases from thought to thought and two minds do not occur together? Or is it the difficulty of the substance of dharmas, that dharmas are fundamentally unarisen and 「無法中不可迴向」 tr. "within no dharma there can be no dedication"? Second, by what does the one who answers judge right and wrong—grasping at marks is being mixed with poison, is slandering the Buddha, is falling into the three inversions; not grasping at marks is as the buddhas know, is shooting at the ground and never failing to hit, is not falling into dual dharmas. The standard of judgement is always the one phrase 「以無所得故」 tr. "with nothing to be attained". Third, with what kinds of similes does the treatise-author guide the two capacities, the deep and the shallow—for one who has newly aroused the mind, the gradual way of the fledgling's six pinions and of iron entering the furnace; for one long in practice, the warning of the poisoned food and the decision of shooting at the ground; and so on to the great fire that does not burn when the firewood is not near, and the drop of water that vanishes at once when it falls on hot iron—each has its proper place. Read on along these five rounds of dialogue, and one will come at last to the same place: that the merit of rejoicing and dedication is supreme and foremost lies not in the breadth of what is taken as object nor in the multitude of what is thought of, but in the one who rejoices grasping nothing at all—not the buddhas, not the roots of goodness, not his own mind: rejoice as the buddhas know, like shooting at the ground, which never fails to hit.

Reading On in the Order of the Treatise

本品 2 葉Chapter contents · 2
  1. 39-01隨喜迴向品之上Rejoicing and Dedication, Part 1 of 2隨喜迴向品之上:隨喜福德迴向最上第一;取相不得如所念;新發意菩薩云何正迴向(經+論)卷61
  2. 39-02隨喜迴向品之下Rejoicing and Dedication, Part 2 of 2隨喜迴向品之下:離相隨喜與滅度相迴向、雜毒食喻與正迴向、諸法不繫三界、心不著迴向最上、與解脫等隨喜、無相三種與五對差別(經+論)卷61
義疏 · 承衍Exposition · Further Resonances

承衍

〈隨喜迴向品〉的義脈,前有所承,後有所啟。所承者是前之〈挍量法施品〉:彼品由佛與釋提桓因逐級校量法施之福——「教一閻浮提人行十善道」,不如「書持般若波羅蜜經卷與他人,令讀、誦、說」得福多,一路展為四天下、三千大千乃至十方恒沙世界之遞階,法施之勝於財施、般若之勝於諸善,於彼品已立。本品即順此更進一層:法施雖勝,猶是身口勤作之業;本品開篇彌勒便立隨喜之宗,論主釋其義為「但以心隨喜」,並自明其承接之意——「先七品中,佛命須菩提令說般若,中間帝釋多問、多說功德事」,今彌勒順佛本意,還令須菩提因隨喜法廣說般若,且抑帝釋以華香供養自多之情:「菩薩但以心隨喜,則勝聲聞、辟支佛、一切眾生布施等及諸無漏功德,何況華香、供養經卷等」。前品把福德校量推到法施之極,本品便把校量的座標整個翻轉——勝負不復在所施之廣狹,而在能迴向之心有所得與無所得。所啟者,品末已露端倪:本品訖於五對差別、四種人之判,而次品〈照明品〉開篇,正由舍利弗躡此發問——菩薩為般若波羅蜜所護,以方便力故,於三世諸佛善根「一切和合隨喜」、迴向無上道,「以是因緣故,我問是事」;由是引出般若能照一切法、應禮般若如禮世尊之廣讚,並以「譬如生盲人,若百、若千、若百千而無前導,不能趣道、入城」喻五波羅蜜離般若之無導。本品說隨喜迴向必藉般若方便力乃得無雜毒,次品便專顯此般若自身之尊——義脈便順此而下。

後來古德讀本品所釋之大經,取徑最完整的一家,為此大經作逐文之疏,於此品亦留有釋文。其書於本品標曰「隨喜品第三十九」,與所釋大經之品名同,而與本論底本「隨喜迴向」之合稱異——一品之名,隨喜與迴向或單舉、或並舉,古來傳本已自並陳,此其可誌者一。其疏於本品,特就隨喜與迴向、隨喜與懺悔往復辨析,設問曰「隨喜如是,懺悔云何」,以般若之觀通貫悔過與隨喜——凡此皆誌其取徑而已,不判高下。另有一家古德,嘗為此論自身作疏,其書今存殘卷,而本品適在所存之列,目次與正文皆標「釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」,與本論底本品名全同——此據殘卷實況如實記之。至若本品之義為後世行法所資者尤深:論主於本品自說「菩薩禮佛有三品:一者、悔過品,二者、隨喜迴向品,三者、勸請諸佛品」,後世修禮懺行法、立五悔之目者,其說迴向處亦云「我順諸法,隨喜迴向,如三世諸佛所知、所見、所許」,名之曰「真實正迴向」——與本品「如諸佛所知」之正迴向同一眼目;又有申隨喜迴向勝二乘自行之義者,亦與本品彌勒立宗之意相呼應。凡此皆誌其流傳之廣與主題之相關,不判其是否逐字承引,不判高下。

把這一路承衍帶回本品,古德所存的與本論自說的,正是同一件事:隨喜迴向不是在諸福德之外別立一福,而是把一切福德收攝於無所得之一心。「譬如美食雜毒」,取相之隨喜非不是福,而其果報之中已伏憂苦;「譬如射地,無不著時;若射餘物,或著、或不著」——如諸佛所知隨喜,則無不著。本品自身早已把這一義推到觀處與果處:福德離五眾十二入十八界,隨喜福德自性離,行離相般若波羅蜜;色乃至常捨行不繫三界、不名三世,無生故無法,無法中不可迴向;「布施與解脫等」乃至一切諸法相皆與解脫等,「不生不滅故」;而其果,則是五對差別——先有量今無量、先有盡今無盡、先雜毒今無毒、先隨生死今隨涅槃、先不定今必疾作佛。隨喜之福所以最上第一,不在心力之儉省,而在此心與諸法實相不相違背,「果報常無盡故」。

因此,〈隨喜迴向品〉最終留下的,是一條可反覆使用的問路法:我此刻所修的福、所隨喜的善、所迴向的心,是取相而起、伏著雜毒的美食,還是如諸佛所知、射地無不著的正迴向?見他人修福時,心中生起的是較量彼我的自多之情,還是「一切眾生行善,與我相似,是我同伴」的隨喜?持此功德趣向無上道時,是計較所緣之廣狹、所念之可得,還是知緣事俱空、「無有法能迴向法」而迴向不虛?在每一番隨喜裡把這幾問答好,「隨喜迴向」便不是身口之外的省便法門,而是般若方便力的全體現前——但以心隨喜,以無所得故,其福最上、第一、最妙、無上、無與等。

Further Resonances

The vein of meaning in the chapter "Rejoicing and Dedication" has something it inherits before it and something it opens after it. What it inherits is the preceding chapter, "Weighing the Gift of Dharma": in that chapter the Buddha and Śakra Devānām Indra weigh, step by step, the merit of the gift of Dharma—「教一閻浮提人行十善道」 tr. "teaching the people of one Jambudvīpa to practise the ten wholesome paths" does not equal 「書持般若波羅蜜經卷與他人,令讀、誦、說」 tr. "writing out and upholding the scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra and giving it to others, causing them to read, recite, and expound it" in the merit obtained, and this unfolds all the way into a graded ascent through the four continents and the three-thousand great-thousand world, and on up to worlds as many as the sands of the Ganges in the ten directions; that the gift of Dharma surpasses the gift of wealth, and that prajñā surpasses all goodness, had already been established in that chapter. This chapter follows on from it and advances one step further: though the gift of Dharma is superior, it is still karma of diligent effort by body and speech. At the very opening of this chapter Maitreya sets up the tenet of rejoicing, whose meaning the treatise-author glosses as 「但以心隨喜」 tr. "merely rejoicing with the mind," and he himself makes clear his intent in taking up the thread—「先七品中,佛命須菩提令說般若,中間帝釋多問、多說功德事」 tr. "In the preceding seven chapters the Buddha commanded Subhūti to speak prajñā; in between, Śakra asked much and spoke much of matters of merit"; now Maitreya, following the Buddha's original intent, turns it back so that Subhūti, by way of the dharma of rejoicing, speaks prajñā at length, and he also checks Śakra's feeling of thinking much of himself over his offerings of flowers and incense: 「菩薩但以心隨喜,則勝聲聞、辟支佛、一切眾生布施等及諸無漏功德,何況華香、供養經卷等」 tr. "The bodhisattva, merely by rejoicing with the mind, surpasses the giving and the like of śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and all beings, as well as all merits without outflows—how much more flowers and incense, offerings to the scroll of the sūtra, and the like!" The preceding chapter pushed the weighing of merit to the limit of the gift of Dharma; this chapter then overturns the whole frame of reference of the weighing—victory and defeat no longer lie in the breadth or narrowness of what is given, but in whether the mind that can dedicate has something to be attained or nothing to be attained. As for what it opens, the chapter's end already shows the first signs of it: this chapter ends with the judgement of the five pairs of difference and the four kinds of persons, and the next chapter, "Illumination," opens precisely with Śāriputra following on from this to ask—the bodhisattva, being protected by prajñāpāramitā, by the power of skilful means, with regard to the roots of goodness of the buddhas of the three times, 「一切和合隨喜」 tr. "gathers them all together and rejoices," and dedicates them to the unsurpassed path; 「以是因緣故,我問是事」 tr. "for this reason I ask about this matter." From this is drawn out the broad praise that prajñā can illuminate all dharmas and that one should worship prajñā as one worships the World-Honored One, and with 「譬如生盲人,若百、若千、若百千而無前導,不能趣道、入城」 tr. "It is like people blind from birth, whether a hundred, a thousand, or a hundred thousand, who, without a guide in front, cannot set out on the road and enter the city," the five perfections apart from prajñā are likened to being without a guide. This chapter says that rejoicing and dedication must rely on the power of skilful means of prajñā to be free of poison; the next chapter then reveals exclusively the honour of this prajñā itself—and the vein of meaning flows on downward from this.

Among the later ancient masters who read the great sūtra that this chapter explains, the one whose approach is most complete composed a line-by-line commentary on this great sūtra, and for this chapter too he left an explanation. His work heads this chapter 「隨喜品第三十九」 tr. "Chapter Thirty-nine, Rejoicing," the same as the chapter name of the great sūtra it explains, and different from the combined name 「隨喜迴向」 tr. "Rejoicing and Dedication" in this treatise's base text—for the name of this one chapter, with rejoicing and dedication now named singly and now named together, the transmitted texts of old had already laid both side by side; this is the first thing worth recording. In this chapter his commentary analyses back and forth, in particular, rejoicing and dedication, and rejoicing and repentance, posing the question 「隨喜如是,懺悔云何」 tr. "Rejoicing being thus, what of confession and repentance?", and running the contemplation of prajñā through both repentance and rejoicing—all this records his approach only, without judging higher or lower. There is another ancient master, who once composed a commentary on this treatise itself; his work survives today in incomplete fascicles, and this chapter happens to be among those that survive: both the table of contents and the main text are headed 「釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」 tr. "Explaining Chapter Thirty-nine, Rejoicing and Dedication," entirely the same as the chapter name in this treatise's base text—this records it faithfully according to the actual state of the incomplete fascicles. As for how deeply the meaning of this chapter has served the practice-rites of later ages: the treatise-author himself says in this chapter 「菩薩禮佛有三品:一者、悔過品,二者、隨喜迴向品,三者、勸請諸佛品」 tr. "The bodhisattva's worship of the Buddha has three parts: first, the part of repentance; second, the part of rejoicing and dedication; third, the part of entreating the buddhas." Those in later ages who set out practice-rites of worship and repentance and established the heading of the five repentances say, where they speak of dedication, 「我順諸法,隨喜迴向,如三世諸佛所知、所見、所許」 tr. "I, according with all dharmas, rejoice and dedicate, as the buddhas of the three times know, see, and permit," and name it 「真實正迴向」 tr. "true and real right dedication"—the same eye as this chapter's right dedication, 「如諸佛所知」 tr. "as the buddhas know"; there are also those who expound the meaning that rejoicing and dedication surpass the self-directed practice of the two vehicles, and this too echoes the intent of Maitreya's setting up of the tenet in this chapter. All this records how widely it has spread and how closely the themes are related; it does not judge whether they quote it word for word, and does not judge higher or lower.

Bringing this whole line of further resonances back to this chapter, what the ancient masters have preserved and what this treatise itself says are one and the same thing: rejoicing and dedication is not the setting up of a separate merit outside all merits, but the gathering of all merits into the single mind of nothing to be attained. 「譬如美食雜毒」 tr. "It is like fine food mixed with poison": rejoicing that grasps at marks is not without merit, yet within its result sorrow and suffering already lie hidden. 「譬如射地,無不著時;若射餘物,或著、或不著」 tr. "It is like shooting at the ground, which never fails to hit; if one shoots at other things, one may hit or may not hit"—rejoicing as the buddhas know, one never fails to hit. This chapter itself had long since pushed this meaning into the place of contemplation and the place of fruition: merit is apart from the five aggregates, the twelve sense-fields, and the eighteen elements; the merit of rejoicing is apart in its self-nature, and one practises the prajñāpāramitā whose mark is being apart; form, up to the practice of constant equanimity, is not bound to the three realms and is not named by the three times; because it is unarisen there is no dharma, and within no dharma there can be no dedication; 「布施與解脫等」 tr. "giving is equal to liberation," and so on up to the marks of all dharmas, all equal to liberation, 「不生不滅故」 tr. "because they neither arise nor cease." And its fruit is the five pairs of difference—formerly measurable, now immeasurable; formerly exhaustible, now inexhaustible; formerly mixed with poison, now without poison; formerly following birth and death, now following nirvāṇa; formerly unassured, now sure to make a buddha quickly. The reason the merit of rejoicing is supreme and foremost does not lie in any economy of the mind's effort, but in this mind not running counter to the real mark of all dharmas, 「果報常無盡故」 tr. "because its result is ever inexhaustible."

Therefore what the chapter "Rejoicing and Dedication" finally leaves behind is a way of asking that can be used again and again: the merit I am cultivating at this moment, the goodness I am rejoicing in, the mind I am dedicating—is it fine food arisen from grasping at marks, with poison lying hidden in it, or the right dedication that is as the buddhas know, like shooting at the ground and never failing to hit? When I see others cultivate merit, is what arises in my mind the feeling of thinking much of myself that weighs them against me, or the rejoicing of 「一切眾生行善,與我相似,是我同伴」 tr. "All beings who practise goodness are like me; they are my companions"? When I take this merit and turn it toward the unsurpassed path, am I calculating the breadth or narrowness of what I take as object and whether what I think of can be found, or do I know that the objects and the matters are both empty, that 「無有法能迴向法」 tr. "there is no dharma that can dedicate a dharma," and yet the dedication is not in vain? Answer these few questions well in every act of rejoicing, and 「隨喜迴向」 tr. "rejoicing and dedication" is not a Dharma-gate of convenient economy outside body and speech, but the power of skilful means of prajñā made present in its entirety—merely rejoicing with the mind, with nothing to be attained, its merit is supreme, foremost, most wondrous, unsurpassed, and without equal.

考據Apparatus

一、科判

本品在《大智度論》釋《大品般若》之次第中屬〈釋餘品〉一段,繫卷六十一,為本論全論此段之新卷首品。前品〈挍量法施品第三十八〉繫卷六十,訖於卷末題「大智度論卷第六十」;本品隨即續於卷六十一之首,卷與品同起。卷首具足卷殼、龍樹造署、羅什譯署(「聖者龍樹造」「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」——二署皆有聖石空缺、宋元明宮異署之校記,見第八目),卷首題〔T25 0487a02〕作「大智度論釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」,品身正文自此起,據底本誌其型別。

本品訖界為卷末題「大智度論卷第六十一」〔T25 0496a18〕;次品〈照明品第四十〉續於後卷。全品純漢字一萬三千零四十四(extract --check 工具值);析為兩單元,之上純漢六千四百五十四、之下六千六百零八,兩單元之和與工具值互差十八字——判為卷題/署記字元於兩單元計入口徑之差,如實誌錄,以工具值一萬三千零四十四為優先參考值,非估算。

品內結構五【經】五【論】交替、析為兩單元(異於品三十八之二經二論單一單元、品三十七之三經三論兩單元)。之上攝經①論①經②論②經③論③,範圍〔0487a02–0491b24 前〕:【經】〔T25 0487a07〕、【論】〔T25 0487b23〕、【經】〔T25 0489a12〕、【論】〔T25 0489b16〕、【經】〔T25 0490a06〕、【論】〔T25 0490c05〕。之下攝經④論④經⑤論⑤,範圍〔0491b24–0496a21〕:【經】〔T25 0491b24〕、【論】〔T25 0492b15〕、【經】〔T25 0493a24〕、【論】〔T25 0495a22〕。切點繫〔T25 0491b24〕(經③論③|經④界),為之下單元【經】首標籤與「復次,若菩薩摩訶薩知所起福德離五眾」同錨之處。十標籤皆恰在塊首,無鑲嵌型過渡。

問答之數,本品頂層凡八組(回搜品內「問曰」八見、「答曰」八見,之上五組〔0488a24/0488c11/0488c27/0490c05/0491b06〕、之下三組〔0495c04/0495c14/0495c22〕,皆位於論段之內),密度介於品三十七之十組與品三十八之二組間。全品說者以彌勒與慧命須菩提對揚為軸——經①彌勒立宗、須菩提以畢竟空難問,往復成品,此對揚結構為前後諸品所罕見(前三品皆佛與帝釋對答為軸)。釋提桓因唯經③一插入(「爾時,釋提桓因語須菩提」〔T25 0490a06〕,回搜「釋提桓因」凡三見);佛於之下經⑤親入讚許(「爾時,佛讚須菩提:『善哉!善哉!如汝所為,為作佛事』」〔T25 0493c08〕),更親說校量與最上隨喜;四天王天乃至阿迦尼吒諸天於經⑤俱來讚歎。舍利弗、阿難皆未出現(與品三十八同型)。於兩單元正文獨立回搜:「彌勒」二十二見(之上十九、之下三)、「須菩提」四十六見(之上二十五、之下二十一),據正文實計(備料曾作二十一/三十七,與正文實計不合,誌之)。

二、術語考

隨喜·迴向。 品名之樞,亦全品之骨。「隨喜」者,論釋開宗明義:「隨喜福德者,不勞身、口業作諸功德,但以心方便見他修福,隨而歡喜」〔T25 0487c04〕,見他修福、心隨而喜,不勞身口而福德成;「迴向」者,持是隨喜福德「迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以無所得故」〔T25 0487a08〕,迴眾善以向無上道。經①立宗:「其福最上、第一、最妙、無上、無與等者」〔T25 0487a13〕——隨喜迴向之福所以最上,勝因緣在「聲聞、辟支佛及一切眾生布施、持戒、修定、隨喜,為自調、為自淨、為自度故」〔T25 0487a14〕,而菩薩「為調一切眾生、為淨一切眾生、為度一切眾生故起」〔T25 0487a18〕。論釋更以三學配之:「持戒者,是自調;修禪者,是自淨;智慧者,是自度」〔T25 0488a17〕。二乘自了、菩薩為眾,此隨喜迴向立品之綱。

共一切眾生·果報可與。 經文「與一切眾生共之」之確義,論釋自設難而通之:「共一切眾生者,是福德不可得與一切眾生,而果報可與」〔T25 0487c28〕——福德體不可移贈,果報(衣食樂具、說法利益、成佛相好、碎身舍利)可施;「是果報可與一切眾生,以果中說因故,言『福德與眾生共』」〔T25 0488a09〕。復申:「善法體不可與人,今直以無畏、無惱施與眾生用」〔T25 0488a12〕。以果中說因,共義乃立。

取相·如所念不可得。 全品難問之起點。須菩提問:緣念十方滅度諸佛諸善根而隨喜迴向,「若善男子取相迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,如所念可得不」〔T25 0487b07〕?彌勒答:「若善男子取相,不得如所念」〔T25 0487b10〕。須菩提遂進難:「若諸緣、諸事無所有」而取相迴向,「是菩薩將無顛倒:無常謂常,想顛倒、心顛倒、見顛倒」〔T25 0487b15〕——取相則墮想、心、見三顛倒,此顛倒之判貫串全品,至之下「不墮想顛倒、心顛倒、見顛倒」而收。

雜毒·正迴向。 之下之樞語對。取相迴向,「諸佛不說有大利益。何以故?是迴向雜毒故。譬如美食雜毒,雖有好色、好香,為人所貪而雜毒」〔T25 0492a10〕——福德如食,取相之愛見煩惱如毒,食美而毒發(逐句配釋見第三目)。對顯正迴向:「如諸佛所知無上智慧,是諸善根相、是諸善根性,我亦如是隨喜;如諸佛所知,我亦如是迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」〔T25 0492b09〕——依佛所知而隨喜迴向,「則為不謗佛,如佛所教、如佛法說。是菩薩摩訶薩迴向,則無雜毒」〔T25 0492b13〕。論④復判邪正之界:「有相是一邊,無相是一邊,離是二邊行中道,是諸佛實相」〔T25 0492c05〕。

不繫三界·法無生。 經⑤正迴向之底據。「如色不繫欲界、不繫色界、不繫無色界;不繫法者,不名過去、不名未來、不名現在」〔T25 0493a25〕,色乃至常捨行諸法皆爾;不繫三界、不名三世,則「不可以取相有所得法迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。何以故?是色無生。若法無生則無法,無法中不可迴向」〔T25 0493b16〕。法無生故無法可取、無法可向,此無相迴向之理極。

無相三種。 論⑤釋「用無相故」之名數:「無相有三種:假名相、法相、無相相」〔T25 0495b17〕——假名相者如車如屋、和合有名而無明取之起惑業;法相者五眾十二入十八界、肉眼觀有慧眼觀無;無相相者,取無相之相還生結使,故亦不應取。「離三種相,故名無相」〔T25 0495b24〕。由是連環而下:「若無有相,是中『無所得』;無得故『無出』;若法無得、無出,即是『無垢無淨』」〔T25 0495b24〕,乃至自相空、常自性空、同法性如實際。

與解脫等。 經⑤最上隨喜之行相:「布施與解脫等,戒、忍、精進、禪、智與解脫等」〔T25 0494c16〕,乃至色受想行識、三世諸法、十方諸佛、諸佛滅度、一切法相皆與解脫等,「我以是諸善根相隨喜功德迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,亦與解脫等,不生不滅故」〔T25 0494c28〕。論⑤答問曰⑧通其疑:「凡夫人以肉眼、六識顛倒觀故見異;若以慧眼,觀諸法皆虛妄,唯涅槃為實。是有為解脫,屬無為、隨無為故名『解脫』」〔T25 0495c24〕——慧眼觀一切法同無餘涅槃寂滅相,故六波羅蜜等與解脫等。

三、譬喻與故事

《大智度論》以譬喻著稱,本品要喻凡七,經論各半,分承「修福可仰」「機熟能受」「取相之患」「依佛所知」諸義。

清涼滿月·大會告集喻(承「修福之人可尊」義)。 論①明修福之人一切眾生所共尊重愛敬——「譬如熱時,清涼滿月,無不樂仰;亦如大會告集,伎樂、餚饌無不畢備,遠近諸人咸共欣赴。修福之人,亦復如是」〔T25 0487c09〕。熱時滿月喻其可仰,大會畢備喻其咸赴——隨喜之所以是福,正在所隨喜者為眾生中最勝。

大火薪喻(承「度一切眾生故勝」義)。 論①答「實不度一切眾生,何以言度一切眾生故勝」之問——「諸佛菩薩功德力能度一切眾生,但以眾生無和合因緣故;譬如大火常有燒力,但以薪不近,故不得燒,近則能燒」〔T25 0488a26〕。火力常在、薪不近則不燒,喻佛菩薩度生之力常在、眾生因緣未合則不度——度力與度事分說,菩薩隨喜為度一切眾生故起,不以事未遍而減其勝。

渧水熱鐵喻(承「學人小錯非實顛倒」義)。 論①辨學人未離欲、憶念忘故取淨相起結使,「還得正念即時滅,如經中譬喻:『如渧水墮大熱鐵上,即時消滅。』小錯故假名顛倒,非實顛倒」〔T25 0489a04〕。渧水墮熱鐵、即墮即消,喻學人結使暫起即滅——凡夫三種顛倒、學人二種之判,繫此喻而明。

鐵入鑪喻(承「久行者心調柔」義)。 論②釋何以久行六波羅蜜者能不取相而迴向——「譬如鐵雖堅䩕,入鑪則柔軟,隨作何器;菩薩心亦如是,久行六波羅蜜、善知識所護故,其心調柔」〔T25 0489b26〕。堅鐵入鑪則柔、隨作何器,喻剛強之心久行乃調、能起無相隨喜。

鳥子羽翼喻(承「新學不可逼說深空」義)。 論②釋「不應新學菩薩前說」——新發意者先教取相隨喜,漸得方便力乃能行無相隨喜,「譬如鳥子,羽翼未成,不可逼令高翔;六翮成就,則能遠飛」〔T25 0489c09〕。羽翼未成喻方便力未具、六翮成就喻漸學能行——深法之施設有其次第,非吝法也。

雜毒食喻(承「取相迴向之患」義·經立論配)。 經④立喻(見第二目),論④逐句配釋:「『食』是隨喜福德,『毒』是取相故愛見等諸煩惱生。『好色』者,福德因緣,作人王、轉輪王、天王,得福樂。『好香』者,得好名譽、富貴、勢力」〔T25 0492c27〕;「愚癡人」者新發意取相著心菩薩,「食之歡喜」者天人中受此富樂,「飯欲消時,受若死、若死等苦」者富樂無常破壞離時憂愁遂死——「若死、若死等」復開二重:「自失命根名『死』,失所著物名『死等』」〔T25 0493a06〕;失智慧命名死、妨行善道名死等。全品最密之一喻,喻取相福德受盡而患生。

射地喻(承「如諸佛所知隨喜必著」義)。 論④釋正迴向之必得——「譬如射地,無不著時;若射餘物,或著、或不著。如諸佛所知隨喜,如射地無不著;若用餘道隨喜,如射餘物,或著、或不著」〔T25 0493a19〕。射地必中、射物或失,喻依諸佛所知之善根實相而隨喜則必得實隨喜、迴向不虛,用餘道則或中或失。

四、所釋經文

品名二型網:隨喜迴向品/隨喜品(異名同品·二型之界斜切本論傳承內部·並錄不判)。 本品品名於本論與所釋經、古德疏各側呈二型分佈,且其分界不落「本論 vs 所釋經」之間,而斜切本論自身傳承內部。逐一據底本誌之。

其一,本論(T25n1509)側。卷首題〔T25 0487a02〕底本(大正)作「隨喜迴向品」(「大智度論釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」);其品題校記——宮本無「迴向」二字(品名作「隨喜品」);聖本作「大智度論釋隨喜品第三十八」(品名亦無「迴向」、品次「三十八」-1 階);石本作「摩訶般若波羅蜜品第三十八隨喜品」(經題式、品次「三十八」-1 階,同品三十二石本 outlier 型)——即本論自身傳承內,大正底本持「隨喜迴向」全名,宮、聖、石三支同持「隨喜」略名(見第八目品題群組校記)。

其二,所釋經(T223)側。羅什譯《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》此品題〔T08 0297b21〕底本作「隨喜品第三十九」,其 head 內同行另有 inline 校記,注文作「丹隨喜迴向品」——丹本(高麗藏丹本)異名「隨喜迴向品」,與 T1509 底本原名逐字全同:非取品內主題詞另擬,而是丹本傳承逕用本論系全名,此為二型跨本互滲之直接 byte 證據。

其三,古德疏側。吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451)標題用「隨喜品第三十九」〔X24n0451 0276a15〕(同 T223 底本型);慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791)標題三筆一致作「釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」(〔X46n0791 0794b09〕目錄、〔X46n0791 0880b08〕正文疏題,另〔X46n0791 0917b12〕一筆核為校記覆誦、其標的指回正文疏題,非獨立第三見),與本論底本完全同型。慧影並自釋二名之所由——「按如千住婆沙釋者,應名隨喜迴向品,故彼論說言如摩訶衍隨喜迴向品中所說,今此中略故但言隨喜品,論將欲釋故舉之云第三十八品釋論也」〔X46n0791 0880b14〕(「千住婆沙」底本原樣,即《十住毘婆沙》之傳寫)——慧影引彼論「隨喜迴向品」之稱以證全名為正、「隨喜品」為略,此古德對二型關係之自證,誌錄不判。

其四,二型之結論。合觀諸側——「隨喜迴向品」型=本論大正底本+X46 慧影+丹本(T223 夾註);「隨喜品」型=T223 底本+X24 吉藏+本論系內宮本、聖本、石本——二型之界斜切本論傳承內部,非「本論全名/所釋經略名」之簡單兩分。判為「異名同品」,全名攝「隨喜」「迴向」二義、略名擷「隨喜」一義,非誤植、非改字、非品序錯位。本版品名從本論底本作「隨喜迴向品」(本版品名主軸為本論底本,既定之裁,本目不翻案);「隨喜品」及諸傳承之異皆逐字保留於對讀敘述,並錄不判。

品次 -1 階(延續既定現象·本品構成第八例·多方印證)。 本論聖本、石本之品次作「第三十八」(見上品名校記),較底本「三十九」少一,與品三十二至三十八聖/石兩支傳承持續性 -1 階同一方向、同一偏移量,構成品三十二至三十九全區間聖/石兩支傳承 -1 階之第八例。本品之印證面更廣者三:其一,卷末品次尾記〔T25 0496a18〕——宋本於卷末題「一」字下有夾註「釋第三十八品」(-1 階)、元本夾註「釋第三十九品」(正階),宋本此尾記與聖石同向(宋本品題處則無 -1 階,僅此尾記,如實誌錄);其二,次品界品題群組〔T25 0496a21〕——石本作「般若波羅蜜品第三十九照明品」,以「三十九」標次品〈照明品第四十〉,-1 階首尾一貫;聖本作「大智度經論釋第三十九品訖第三十品上是能品」(底本原樣傳錄,其「第三十九品訖」與聖本品題「第三十八」之階不合,機制未明,誌錄不強解);其三,慧影疏之古德自證續存——慧影疏本品正文開篇:「第三十八品者,即是諸分之中大分第三,明慈氏菩薩與善吉更復復宗因隨喜迴向明於波若」〔X46n0791 0880b09〕,以「第三十八品」指本品(三十九),與其釋品三十八時稱「第三十七品」同一方向偏差,古德自證 -1 階之第二例。聖本、石本、宋本尾記、慧影疏四方各自不同來源、同一方向偏差,誌錄不判優劣,其機制未明,不強解。

T223 mulu n 屬性重複瑕疵(誌錄不強解)。 所釋經 T223 側,本品之 mulu 屬性標序作「n=39」而顯文題「39 隨喜品」〔T08 0297b21〕,顯文與屬性相合;然另核 T223 品三十六至三十九區間 mulu n= 屬性:尊導品 n=37、法稱品 n=37(重複)、法施品 n=39、隨喜品 n=39(重複)——前品法施品之 mulu 屬性亦作 n=39,與本品重複繫號(37 重複、39 重複、無 38),屬 CBETA 編碼層現象之續存;惟顯文品號序列(36/37/38/39)本身連續無誤,對位以顯文標號與內容逐字比對為準,如實誌錄,本目不強解。

全量牒經對讀(兩側對勘·開篇逐句核)。 本論品①【經】開篇與所釋經〈隨喜品〉逐字幾近同文——本論「爾時,彌勒菩薩摩訶薩語慧命須菩提:『有菩薩摩訶薩隨喜福德,與一切眾生共之,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以無所得故』」〔T25 0487a07〕;T223 同段作「爾時彌勒菩薩摩訶薩語慧命須菩提:『有菩薩摩訶薩隨喜福德與一切眾生共之,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以無所得故』」〔T08 0297b22〕——同一彌勒告須菩提之發端、同一隨喜迴向母題(僅標點細微差異,非內容分歧)。判為「異名同品」,非場景移植(依兩側對勘之例,以開篇逐句比對定位,非拿甲本詞搜乙本)。本論五【論】層為論體之結構性擴增,所釋經無此層,非異文。所釋經 T223 側於本品對讀範圍內之 <app> witness 逐條統計及全量 difflib 精算,此處未展開,據實誌其未展開,俟後續考據補查,不以估值充數。

五、般若義眼

本品之眼,在「隨喜迴向」一行之邪正全判——由「但以心隨喜、其福最上」之立宗起,歷「取相不得如所念」之難、「正迴向不墮三顛倒」之答、「雜毒/無雜毒」之判,終歸於「與解脫等」之最上隨喜。其義可約為五重。

其一,隨喜迴向最上第一——為度一切眾生故起。彌勒立宗:菩薩隨喜福德與一切眾生共之、迴向無上道、以無所得故,「其福最上、第一、最妙、無上、無與等者」〔T25 0487a13〕。所以勝者,二乘及眾生之福「為自調、為自淨、為自度」,菩薩之福「為調一切眾生、為淨一切眾生、為度一切眾生故起」〔T25 0487a18〕;論釋且明其抑帝釋自多之意:「菩薩但以心隨喜,則勝聲聞、辟支佛、一切眾生布施等及諸無漏功德,何況華香、供養經卷等」〔T25 0487c01〕——不勞身口、一念隨喜而勝諸供養,此立品之宗。

其二,取相之難——緣事無所有,將無顛倒。須菩提以畢竟空智慧難問:所念過去諸佛諸善根久已滅度,「若善男子取相,不得如所念」〔T25 0487b10〕;既「諸緣、諸事無所有」而取相迴向,將無墮於「無常謂常」之想、心、見三顛倒〔T25 0487b11〕?乃至逼問:「何等是緣?何等是事?何等是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?何等是善根?何等是隨喜心迴向」〔T25 0487b21〕——此難不解,隨喜迴向一行即墮憶想分別,全品後幅皆為答此難而設。

其三,正迴向——般若方便力,不生佛想,盡滅入法性。答此難者,機與法雙開:機則「久行六波羅蜜、多供養諸佛、種善根、與善知識相隨、善學自相空法」〔T25 0489a12〕者能之,新發意者以利根、善知識二因緣亦堪任;法則「用心隨喜功德,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,是心盡、滅、變、離」〔T25 0489b04〕——念諸佛及僧「不生佛想、不生僧想,無善根想」,迴向心「亦不生心想」〔T25 0490b06〕,心盡滅入無常門、到法性中,「法性中無有分別是心、是非心」〔T25 0491b02〕。論④並判其界:「有相是一邊,無相是一邊,離是二邊行中道,是諸佛實相」〔T25 0492c05〕——正迴向非捨迴向,乃於不取相中迴向。

其四,雜毒與射地——邪正之判。取相迴向如美食雜毒,「愚癡之人食之歡喜」而「飯欲消時,受若死、若死等苦」〔T25 0492a13〕;不諦受、不諦取相、不諦誦讀、不解義而教人取相迴向,「則為謗佛,不隨佛教、不隨法說」〔T25 0492b02〕。正迴向者依佛所知:「如諸佛所知無上智慧,是諸善根相、是諸善根性,我亦如是隨喜」〔T25 0492b09〕——「如諸佛所知隨喜,如射地無不著;若用餘道隨喜,如射餘物,或著、或不著」〔T25 0493a20〕。依佛所知則必得實隨喜、迴向不虛;依己取相則福盡患生。經⑤更逐級校量:十善、四禪、五神通乃至恒沙供養,皆不如「於諸善根心不著,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」〔T25 0493c15〕,諸天四讚「最大迴向……不墮二法」〔T25 0494a14〕。

其五,與解脫等——最上隨喜之極(本品收束之所歸)。佛親答「云何名隨喜最上」:念三世諸法「不取不捨、不念非不念、不得非不得」〔T25 0494c03〕,布施乃至一切法相皆「與解脫等」,隨喜迴向「亦與解脫等,不生不滅故」〔T25 0495a01〕;論⑤終判五對差別——「先福德有量,今福德無量;先福德有盡,今福德無盡;先福德雜毒,今福德無毒;先福德隨生死,今福德隨涅槃;先福德不定,或作佛、或退,今福德定到,必疾作佛」〔T25 0496a09〕——結歸四種人:「若凡夫人求世間樂,若聲聞、辟支佛人求涅槃樂,若諸菩薩摩訶薩求佛樂」〔T25 0496a14〕。一念隨喜、無所得迴向,勝無量劫有所得行——「應如是隨喜生福德迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,如此品中說」〔T25 0496a16〕一句收束全品,與義眼其一首尾相貫。

六、諸家異釋

《大智度論》本無逐文全疏之傳統,古德引釋率屬據實偏倚。本品古德覆讀有三:釋所釋經之吉藏疏存完整專章,釋論之慧影疏於本品所繫卷六十一有覆蓋,均正書中並有具名徵引一筆(本品在品三十七、三十八連續零命中後首見)。此目誌錄其所疏所引與本品之對應,不判各家詮釋高下。

吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451)。 於所釋經〈隨喜品〉之逐文疏,起〔X24n0451 0276a15〕(mulu「隨喜品第三十九」),迄〔X24n0451 0280a11〕前(次 mulu「照明品第四十」起前,本目依 mulu 連續序列判定;0280a11 後仍見「隨喜」字樣者屬次品內文續用,非本品疏節),覆本品經全篇。其可誌者四。其一,品位總判——「九品半經開為二段,前八品半經受持讀誦書寫解說乃至供養般若故其福無邊,今一品明直依般若嘿念隨喜不動身口得福無邊」〔X24n0451 0276a16〕:吉藏以「不動身口、嘿念隨喜」界本品於前八品半供養持說福之上,與本論「不勞身、口業」義相應。其二,生起二義——「二者、上明香華等供養得無邊福,天主自慶此是我等能辦非出家人所有,今欲報其自多之情,明起一隨喜則其福無邊」〔X24n0451 0276a22〕:其「報其自多之情」與本論論①「彌勒欲抑其自多之情」〔T25 0487b29〕逐義相值,古德讀出同一施設。其三,隨喜與迴向之辨——「於他功德則生隨喜,自之功德則宜迴向,他功德不可迴向,但有發願令迴向也」〔X24n0451 0276b07〕,並開隨喜四句(所隨喜有所得無所得、能隨喜心有所得無所得)。其四,隨喜與懺悔之辨——「問:隨喜如是,懺悔云何?答:如般若觀隨喜,無福不生,無罪不滅」〔X24n0451 0276c01〕:吉藏於本節專辨隨喜、迴向、懺悔三行之關係,對義疏具直接引用價值。

慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791)。 為釋本論之唯一古疏,僅殘卷存世;本品所繫之論卷六十一正落於其覆蓋範圍內(承前品覆蓋而續)。其於本品之逐文疏,起〔X46n0791 0880b08〕(疏題「釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」,緊接前品之後),覆本品論篇(正文起訖範圍與品內段落之逐段對應,此處未逐段精核,據實誌闕)。其可誌者三。其一,品位大判——「第三十八品者,即是諸分之中大分第三,明慈氏菩薩與善吉更復復宗因隨喜迴向明於波若」〔X46n0791 0880b09〕:慧影判本品為其科「諸分之中大分第三」,並明彌勒(慈氏)與須菩提(善吉)「復宗」因隨喜迴向以明般若之對揚結構。其二,次第之由——「何故次校量之後明隨喜等義?論隨喜者,要須以諸功德用為隨喜,上教量分中既應明功德不可思量,今欲以上來功德普一切共迴向佛道,故次校量之後明隨喜等義」〔X46n0791 0880b10〕:以校量諸品明功德、本品迴向功德,釋品次相生。其三,品名與 -1 階之自證——引《十住毘婆沙》證「應名隨喜迴向品」而 T223「略故但言隨喜品」(引文見第四目),並以「第三十八品」指本品(-1 階古德自證,見第四目),皆本品品名網之古德底據。

均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784)·隋代三論宗古德。 全書回搜「隨喜迴向品」零命中,「隨喜品」一命中——「又大品經第十一隨喜品問彌勒菩薩云:未來有當果脩行,得汝所念,得此果不?菩薩答云:不得也」〔X46n0784 0611b11〕:均正明稱「大品經第十一隨喜品」,撮引本品經①須菩提(經文實由須菩提問彌勒)「如所念可得不」、彌勒答「不得如所念」之問答以資己義(其行文以「問彌勒菩薩」總攝問端,屬撮意引,非逐字牒經;「第十一」為其所據卷次之稱)——品三十七、三十八連續零命中後,均正於本品首見具名徵引,如實誌錄。

七、互讀與承衍

本品之義脈,前後相承者有四,皆此目所誌,不代定讀。

其一,「帝釋供養福→彌勒隨喜勝」之承衍(承前品線·誌錄不判)。前三品(供養、舍利、法施)以佛與帝釋對答校量供養般若之福;本品轉軸——論①自明:「先七品中,佛命須菩提令說般若,中間帝釋多問、多說功德事。今彌勒順佛本意,還欲令須菩提因隨喜法廣說般若波羅蜜」〔T25 0487b24〕,且彌勒「欲抑其自多之情」〔T25 0487b29〕而明心隨喜勝華香供養——由財法供養之校量下貫至一念隨喜之校量,前諸品明供養般若福大,本品明隨喜迴向更上,校量一線相承而說者結構轉為彌勒須菩提對揚。

其二,「破生品」品內互讀(硬鏈本論自身·誌錄不判)。論⑤釋色出三界即色實相——「是色出三界者,即是色實相,初、後生相不可得,如〈破生品〉中說」〔T25 0495a27〕:論主自指本論前帙〈破生品〉之無生義為此處「法無生則無法、無法中不可迴向」之所本,品內承衍自成一鏈,本目誌其迹。

其三,後世徵引(天台止觀五悔一系·誌主題關聯與近逐字承用分層並錄)。智顗《摩訶止觀》五悔章隨喜、迴向兩科與本品義脈深相關聯——其隨喜科明稱所依:「《法華》隨喜法、《大品》隨喜人,人、法互舉耳」〔T46n1911 0098b21〕(「《大品》隨喜」即指本品所釋經);其正迴向科:「正迴向者:斷三界道,滅諸戲論,乾煩惱泥,滅棘刺林,捨除重檐;不取、不念、不見、不得、不分別」〔T46n1911 0098b26〕,義取本品論③「斷生死道」「滅諸戲論」「棄重擔」讚歎段〔T25 0491a01〕與經⑤「不取不捨、不念非不念」而文非逐字;至「我順諸法,隨喜迴向,如三世諸佛所知、所見、所許。是名『真實正迴向』」〔T46n1911 0098c01〕,即本品「如諸佛所知,我亦如是迴向」〔T25 0492b10〕義之承用,「所知、所見、所許」三連為智顗鋪文,非本品逐字——誌主題關聯,不判逐字引。湛然《止觀輔行傳弘決》釋此段則有近逐字承用與明稱引各一:「以善法體不可與人。故今直以無畏無惱。以施眾生」〔T46n1912 0383c07〕,即本品論①「善法體不可與人,今直以無畏、無惱施與眾生用」〔T25 0488a12〕之近逐字承用(「善法體不可與人」七字連文 byte 相合);又「大論問曰。何故名二乘為自調自淨自度。而不迴向。答。戒為自調禪為自淨慧為自度」〔T46n1912 0383c17〕,明稱「大論」,撮引本品論①「持戒者,是自調;修禪者,是自淨;智慧者,是自度」〔T25 0488a17〕之義(文序小異,撮意引)。至其「如巧匠指示倍得價直。執斧之人倍用功力」〔T46n1912 0383c14〕之巧匠執斧喻,回搜本品兩單元正文「巧匠」「執斧」皆零命中——湛然自設喻或別有所本,誌主題關聯,不繫本品,不判逐字引。

其四,寶庫掛鏈(穩定徵引·軟引)。本品「取相迴向」雜毒之判、「如諸佛所知,我亦如是迴向」之正迴向法、「與解脫等」之最上隨喜,為大乘迴向義之經論所本,落穩定徵引〔T25n1509 隨喜迴向品·卷六十一〕;心經/金剛經/唯識諸帙引本論處尚未定稿,故軟引,俟其逐字核存。此屬般若義下貫諸經之承衍,誌錄不判。

八、校本與版本說明

本品底本為《大智度論》卷六十一〔T25 0487a02–0496a21〕(品身正文自品題〔T25 0487a02〕起,終於卷末題「大智度論卷第六十一」句〔T25 0496a18〕,次品〈照明品第四十〉續於後卷,次品界品題群組校記繫〔T25 0496a21〕);所釋經校本為《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》〈隨喜品〉〔T08 0297b21 起〕;古德疏校本為吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451,覆本品〔X24n0451 0276a15–0280a11〕前)、慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791,覆本品〔X46n0791 0880b08 起〕),均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784)具名徵引一筆〔X46n0784 0611b11〕(見第六目)。異讀校記依大正校勘,涉大正底本與宋、元、明、宮、聖、石(石山寺本)諸本及麗藏(K)、CBETA 校之異。

品名/卷題群組校記(二型網與 -1 階之底據·專列)。 品首卷題群組校記〔T25 0487a02〕並陳品名之異文——其總條作「大智度論釋隨喜迴向品第三十九【大】|大智度論釋隨喜品第三十八【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第三十八隨喜品【石】」,並拆分為「迴向【大】|〔-〕【宮】」(宮本品名無「迴向」);造署譯署二條——聖石俱空缺,宋元明宮作「龍樹菩薩造」「姚秦三藏法師鳩摩羅什譯」。此與所釋經 T223 側之底本「隨喜品」、丹本夾註「隨喜迴向品」,X24 標題「隨喜品第三十九」,X46 標題「釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」、body「第三十八品」相參,即品名二型網與 -1 階之底據——如實並錄,不強加調解。

卷末與次品界校記(宋本 -1 階尾記·聖石次品界·專列)。 卷末〔T25 0496a18〕——「一【大】|一(釋第三十八品)夾註【宋】|一(釋第三十九品)夾註【元】」,宋本於卷末題下記「釋第三十八品」,品次與底本「三十九」不合(-1 階),元本記「釋第三十九品」正階——宋本此為卷末尾記層之 -1 階印證(其品題處無 -1 階)。次品界〔T25 0496a21〕——「大智度論釋照明品第四十【大】|大智度經論釋第三十九品訖第三十品上是能品【聖】|般若波羅蜜品第三十九照明品【石】」,石本以「三十九」標次品(-1 階經題式首尾一貫);聖本底本原樣傳錄如上,誌錄不強解。皆品次計數攸關之底據,見第四目。

禮佛三品夾註條·CBETA 複合條(專列)。 論⑤「菩薩禮佛有三品」句〔T25 0495b09〕——校記載「菩薩」乃至「請諸佛品」二十六字宋、元、明、宮、聖俱作夾註(聖本「品」字下有「也」字),即五本以此句為注文非正文;同句「三【大】|五【宮】」,宮本作「禮佛有五品」——異本讀法並列保存,正文仍從現行底本「三品」讀法。又問曰⑧句〔T25 0495c22〕「名【大】|各【CB】【麗-CB】【宮】【石】」——CBETA 依麗藏(K14n0549_p1114c05)校「名」為「各」(「各各相」),帶麗藏頁碼出處之複合條,異於一般異本並列,故專列。

校勘總帳(二百零六條全量對帳·底本原樣)。 下依工作底本原樣傳錄——本品校記合計二百零六條(之上自身錨點一百零七·之下自身錨點七十七·star-corresp 二十二,與工作底本頭部 app 206、extract --check 工具值機械相合),內含本品自身錨點校記(own)與品內 refrain 遞歸重引(star-corresp)混列,異本讀法並列保存,正文仍從現行底本讀法。本品 star 條凡二十二,其 corresp 目標均為品內既有七位數字 note id(與品三十八之 hex 尾格式處理路徑不同,本品 star-corresp 逕解至數字目標,備料誌其法),表列 loc 為 corresp 目標之所屬行,隨條標明目標,不臆造:

之上(自身錨點一百零七條)

  • 〔T25 0487a02〕大智度論釋隨喜迴向品第三十九【大】|大智度論釋隨喜品第三十八【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第三十八隨喜品【石】(品名/卷題群組核心·聖本品名無「迴向」且品次-1階·石本經題式-1階·見第四目)
  • 〔T25 0487a02〕迴向【大】|〔-〕【宮】(品名·宮本無「迴向」二字=宮本品名作「隨喜品」·見第四目)
  • 〔T25 0487a05〕聖者龍樹造【大】|龍樹菩薩造【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|〔-〕【聖】【石】(造署之異·聖石空缺)
  • 〔T25 0487a06〕後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】|姚秦三藏法師鳩摩羅什譯【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(譯署之異·聖石空缺)
  • 〔T25 0487a07〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0487a10〕一切【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0487a10〕福【大】|〔-〕【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0487a14〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487a15〕所【大】|起所【元】【明】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0487a20〕言【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487a21〕是佛【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487a22〕至【大】|乃至【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0487a22〕乃至【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487a25〕持戒【大】|若持戒【石】
  • 〔T25 0487a25〕福德【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487a25〕修定【大】|若修定【石】
  • 〔T25 0487a27〕及【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0487b01〕根【大】|眾【明】
  • 〔T25 0487b02〕福【大】|功【石】
  • 〔T25 0487b06〕是心【大】|心是【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0487b11〕諸緣、諸事【大】|諸事諸緣【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487b13〕辟支佛【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487b21〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0487b23〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0487c01〕其【大】|甚【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487c03〕等【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0487c10〕告【大】|先【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0487c11〕欣赴【大】|作起【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487c16〕所【大】|所共【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0487c22〕樂【大】|安隱【石】
  • 〔T25 0487c26〕慧【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488a05〕種【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488a07〕事【大】|乘【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488a12〕直【大】|但【石】
  • 〔T25 0488a12〕惱【大】|總【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488a13〕義【大】|此義【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488a15〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488a19〕命【大】|念【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488b11〕相【大】|想【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488b12〕無【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488b17〕去【大】|至【石】
  • 〔T25 0488b17〕諸【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488b20〕心、【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488b24〕功【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488b29〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488c04〕說【大】|諸【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488c07〕度【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0488c09〕種【大】|種種【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488c13〕起【大】|趣【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488c13〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488c14〕隨喜【大】|隨喜者【石】
  • 〔T25 0488c16〕六【大】|八【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488c17〕起【大】|念【石】
  • 〔T25 0488c21〕若【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0488c27〕而【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0489a04〕相【大】|想【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0489a09〕亦【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0489a16〕以不【大】|不以【石】
  • 〔T25 0489a26〕亡【大】|忘【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0489a27〕護【大】|誰【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489a29〕義【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489b06〕是【大】|有【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489b12〕無有【大】|有無【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489b13〕菩提【大】|菩提亦【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0489b17〕隨喜心【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|而隨喜心【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0489b19〕是【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0489b25〕諸【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0489b25〕雖【大】|離【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489b29〕不【大】|不能【石】
  • 〔T25 0489b29〕能【大】|法【石】
  • 〔T25 0489c01〕不二【大】|不二法【元】【明】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0489c02〕名【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0489c07〕善【大】|前【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489c11〕久【大】|人【宮】|久人【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0489c17〕況【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489c18〕法【大】|法法【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0489c24〕緣事【大】|事緣【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490a15〕授【大】|捨【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490a21〕菩薩【大】|菩薩法【石】
  • 〔T25 0490a22〕乃【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490a25〕生死【大】|〔-〕【宮】【石】
  • 〔T25 0490a28〕以【大】|用【石】
  • 〔T25 0490a29〕喜【大】|盡【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490a29〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】|應隨喜隨喜已【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490b04〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490b15〕處【大】|處及【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0490b15〕如是【大】|如是滅【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0490b16〕邪【大】|耶【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490b24〕功德【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0490b26〕知是【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490b27〕法【大】|法是【元】【明】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0490c06〕耶【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0490c07〕答【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0490c25〕減【大】|損【石】
  • 〔T25 0490c27〕所【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491a05〕故【大】|故故【元】【明】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0491a11〕如【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0491a12〕屐【大】|跋【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491a12〕滅【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0491a12〕五分【大】|分五【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491a13〕分五【大】|五分【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491a20〕作【大】|非【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0491a24〕想【大】|相【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491a24〕想【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491b20〕況【大】|何況【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0491b21〕是【大】|是故【石】
  • 〔T25 0491b22〕墮【大】|隨【聖】

之下(自身錨點七十七條)

  • 〔T25 0491b24〕起【大】|作【石】
  • 〔T25 0491b25〕亦知【大】|離亦知離【石】
  • 〔T25 0491b25〕離【大】|雖【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491b29〕若【大】|若是【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0491c06〕檀波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0491c18〕作【大】|亦【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0491c21〕諸【大】|諸法【石】
  • 〔T25 0492a05〕如【大】|以【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0492a09〕得、【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0492a11〕美【大】|義【聖】
  • 〔T25 0492a12〕而【大】|而其【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0492a14〕誦讀【大】|讀誦【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0492a16〕未來、現在十方【大】|十方未來現在【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0492a16〕已【大】|以【石】
  • 〔T25 0492a22〕世界【大】|國土【石】
  • 〔T25 0492b01〕動【大】|勳【聖】
  • 〔T25 0492b08〕諸【大】|修諸【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0492b18〕諸法【大】|諸法者【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0492b23〕是【大】|是名【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0492b29〕自相【大】|相自【石】
  • 〔T25 0492c07〕不墮【大】|不墮無【聖】
  • 〔T25 0492c11〕以【大】|知【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493a03〕於【大】|相【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493a03〕受【大】|愛【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493a06〕根【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493a08〕名「死【大】|死名【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493a11〕逗【大】|讀【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0493a14〕意【大】|心【石】
  • 〔T25 0493a20〕餘物【大】|物餘【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493a23〕佛【大】|諸佛【石】
  • 〔T25 0493a24〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493b09〕無【大】|不【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493b12〕如【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0493b16〕不【大】|不名【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493b17〕法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493b20〕無【大】|不【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493b20〕錯謬【大】|謬錯【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493b24〕法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493b25〕無【大】|不【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493c07〕是【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0493c07〕是法相【大】|是法是法相【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493c08〕讚【大】|語【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493c13〕定【大】|空【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493c16〕最上【大】|須菩提是善男子善女人福德最上【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0494a03〕告【大】|語【石】
  • 〔T25 0494a06〕等【大】|等者【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0494a07〕千【大】|千萬【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0494a07〕倍【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0494a13〕子【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0494a17〕無數【大】|無數百千億【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0494a18〕瓔珞【大】|纓絡【聖】
  • 〔T25 0494a18〕香【大】|百【聖】
  • 〔T25 0494a19〕作【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0494a19〕如【大】|〔-〕【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0494a23〕刪【大】|珊【元】【明】|那【聖】
  • 〔T25 0494a28〕王【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0494a29〕作【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0494b29〕說【大】|所說【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0494c03〕念【大】|於【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0495a03〕是【大】|如是【聖】
  • 〔T25 0495a14〕時【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0495a14〕不【大】|無【石】
  • 〔T25 0495a14〕法【大】|法故【聖】
  • 〔T25 0495a17〕及【大】|及能【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0495a20〕迴向【大】|如是迴向【石】
  • 〔T25 0495b09〕菩薩禮佛有三品,一者悔過品,二者隨喜迴向品,三者勸請諸佛品【大】|「菩薩」乃至「請諸佛品」二十六字,宋、元、明、宮、聖俱作夾註;聖本「品」字下有「也」字(校注原樣傳錄·見第八目專列)
  • 〔T25 0495b09〕三【大】|五【宮】(宮本「禮佛有五品」·專列)
  • 〔T25 0495c05〕天【大】|人【石】
  • 〔T25 0495c21〕常【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0495c22〕名【大】|各【CB】【麗-CB】【宮】【石】(CBETA 依麗藏校「名」為「各」·複合條·帶麗藏出處 K14n0549_p1114c05·專列)
  • 〔T25 0496a02〕心識【大】|諸【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0496a07〕集【大】|進【宋】【宮】|習【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0496a10〕今【大】|是【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0496a14〕種【大】|福【聖】
  • 〔T25 0496a15〕人【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0496a18〕一【大】|一(釋第三十八品)夾註【宋】|一(釋第三十九品)夾註【元】(卷末品次尾記·宋本「三十八」-1階·元本「三十九」正階·見第四目)
  • 〔T25 0496a21〕大智度論釋照明品第四十【大】|大智度經論釋第三十九品訖第三十品上是能品【聖】|般若波羅蜜品第三十九照明品【石】(次品界品題群組·石本經題式-1階「三十九」·見第四目)

star-corresp 重引(二十二條·跨兩單元·表列 loc=corresp 目標所屬行)

  • 〔T25 0487a14〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0487008))
  • 〔T25 0487a07〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0487005))
  • 〔T25 0487b23〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0487024))
  • 〔T25 0487a07〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0487005))
  • 〔T25 0490b04〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0490008))
  • 〔T25 0487b23〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0487024))
  • 〔T25 0490b16〕邪【大】|耶【聖】(star·corresp→note(0490011))
  • 〔T25 0491a24〕想【大】|相【宋】【宮】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0491008))
  • 〔T25 0491a24〕想【大】|相【宋】【宮】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0491008))
  • 〔T25 0491a24〕想【大】|相【宋】【宮】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0491008))
  • 〔T25 0487a07〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0487005))
  • 〔T25 0492a11〕美【大】|義【聖】(star·corresp→note(0492003))
  • 〔T25 0487b23〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0487024))
  • 〔T25 0490b16〕邪【大】|耶【聖】(star·corresp→note(0490011))
  • 〔T25 0490b16〕邪【大】|耶【聖】(star·corresp→note(0490011))
  • 〔T25 0490b16〕邪【大】|耶【聖】(star·corresp→note(0490011))
  • 〔T25 0493b20〕無【大】|不【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0493015))
  • 〔T25 0492a22〕世界【大】|國土【石】(star·corresp→note(0492008))
  • 〔T25 0492a22〕世界【大】|國土【石】(star·corresp→note(0492008))
  • 〔T25 0494a19〕作【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0494009))
  • 〔T25 0494a19〕作【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0494009))
  • 〔T25 0487b23〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0487024)) 以上二百零六條,與工作底本錨點校記之數機械相合(own 與 star-corresp 混列如上,star 之目標已隨條標明並逐條覆核)。品名/卷題攸關之數處(品題〔0487a02〕群組、卷末〔0496a18〕宋元夾註、次品界〔0496a21〕聖石群組)已於上文專列,並與所釋經、古德疏雙向對校(第四目、第六目)。

所釋經 witness 統計(未展開·誌闕待補)。 所釋經 T223 側於本品對讀範圍(〔T08 0297b21〕起至下品前)內之 <app> witness 逐條統計,此處未展開(承前品格式),據實誌其未展開,俟後續考據補查,不以估值充數。

I. Structural Placement

Within the sequence in which the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa comments on the Larger Sūtra, this chapter belongs to the section of the Commentary on the Remaining Chapters and falls in Fascicle 61; it is the first chapter of a new fascicle within this section of the whole treatise. The preceding chapter, "Weighing the Gift of Dharma", Chapter 38, falls in Fascicle 60 and ends at the fascicle-end title 「大智度論卷第六十」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Sixty"; this chapter follows immediately at the head of Fascicle 61, fascicle and chapter beginning together. The head of the fascicle carries the full fascicle shell, the signature of Nāgārjuna's authorship, and the signature of Kumārajīva's translation (「聖者龍樹造」 tr. "composed by the noble Nāgārjuna" and 「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」 tr. "translated by Kumārajīva, Tripiṭaka master of the kingdom of Kucha, of the Later Qin"—both signatures have collation notes recording that they are absent in the Shōgozō and Ishiyama texts and differently worded in the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace editions; see Section VIII); the fascicle-head title〔T25 0487a02〕 reads 「大智度論釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication, the Thirty-ninth", and the main text of the chapter body begins from here; its type is recorded on the basis of the base text.

The closing boundary of this chapter is the fascicle-end title 「大智度論卷第六十一」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Sixty-one"〔T25 0496a18〕; the next chapter, "Illumination", Chapter 40, continues in the following fascicle. The whole chapter has thirteen thousand and forty-four pure Chinese characters (the tool value of extract --check, the same value as at the head of the working base text); it is divided into two units, the First Part with six thousand four hundred and fifty-four pure Chinese characters and the Last Part with six thousand six hundred and eight, the sum of the two units differing from the tool value by eighteen characters—judged to be a difference in whether the characters of the fascicle title and signatures are counted within the two units; this is recorded as it is, and the tool value of thirteen thousand and forty-four is taken as the preferred reference value, not an estimate.

Within the chapter the structure is five Sūtra and five Treatise sections in alternation, divided into two units (unlike the two Sūtra and two Treatise sections in a single unit of Chapter 38, and the three Sūtra and three Treatise sections in two units of Chapter 37). The First Part comprises Sūtra ①, Treatise ①, Sūtra ②, Treatise ②, Sūtra ③, and Treatise ③, with the range〔0487a02–0491b24 前〕: 【經】〔T25 0487a07〕, 【論】〔T25 0487b23〕, 【經】〔T25 0489a12〕, 【論】〔T25 0489b16〕, 【經】〔T25 0490a06〕, 【論】〔T25 0490c05〕. The Last Part comprises Sūtra ④, Treatise ④, Sūtra ⑤, and Treatise ⑤, with the range〔0491b24–0496a21〕: 【經】〔T25 0491b24〕, 【論】〔T25 0492b15〕, 【經】〔T25 0493a24〕, 【論】〔T25 0495a22〕. The cut point is fixed at〔T25 0491b24〕 (the boundary Sūtra ③ and Treatise ③ | Sūtra ④), the place where the first 【經】 tag of the Last Part unit shares its anchor with 「復次,若菩薩摩訶薩知所起福德離五眾」 tr. "Again, if the bodhisattva-mahāsattva knows that the merit he has produced is apart from the five aggregates". All ten tags fall exactly at the head of their blocks, with no transition of the embedded type.

As for the number of questions and answers, the chapter has eight rounds at the top level in all (searching back within the chapter, 「問曰」 tr. "Question" appears eight times and 「答曰」 tr. "Answer" eight times; five rounds in the First Part〔0488a24/0488c11/0488c27/0490c05/0491b06〕 and three in the Last Part〔0495c04/0495c14/0495c22〕, all located within the Treatise sections), a density between the ten rounds of Chapter 37 and the two rounds of Chapter 38. The speakers of the whole chapter take as their axis the paired exchange between Maitreya and the venerable Subhūti—in Sūtra ① Maitreya establishes the thesis and Subhūti challenges it with ultimate emptiness, and the chapter is formed by their back-and-forth; this structure of paired exchange is rarely seen in the chapters before and after (the three preceding chapters all take the dialogue between the Buddha and Śakra as their axis). Śakra Devānām Indra makes only one interjection, in Sūtra ③ (「爾時,釋提桓因語須菩提」 tr. "At that time Śakra Devānām Indra said to Subhūti"〔T25 0490a06〕; searching back, 「釋提桓因」 tr. "Śakra Devānām Indra" appears three times in all); the Buddha himself enters in Sūtra ⑤ of the Last Part to give his approval (「爾時,佛讚須菩提:『善哉!善哉!如汝所為,為作佛事』」 tr. "At that time the Buddha praised Subhūti: ‘Excellent! Excellent! As you act, you are doing the Buddha's work’"〔T25 0493c08〕), and further himself expounds the weighing and the supreme rejoicing; the gods from the heavens of the Four Heavenly Kings up to the Akaniṣṭha heaven all come together in Sūtra ⑤ to give praise. Neither Śāriputra nor Ānanda appears (the same type as Chapter 38). An independent search back in the source text of the two units found 「彌勒」 tr. "Maitreya" twenty-two times (nineteen in the First Part, three in the Last Part) and 「須菩提」 tr. "Subhūti" forty-six times (twenty-five in the First Part, twenty-one in the Last Part), according to the actual count in the source text (the preparatory materials gave twenty-one / thirty-seven, which does not agree with the actual count in the source text; this has been noted).

II. Terms Examined

Rejoicing · dedication. The pivot of the chapter name, and also the backbone of the whole chapter. As for 「隨喜」 tr. "rejoicing", the treatise's explanation opens by making the meaning clear: 「隨喜福德者,不勞身、口業作諸功德,但以心方便見他修福,隨而歡喜」 tr. "As for the merit of rejoicing: without labouring the karma of body and speech to perform merits, one simply, by the skilful means of the mind, sees others cultivating merit and rejoices along with them"〔T25 0487c04〕—seeing others cultivate merit, the mind rejoices along with them, and without labouring body and speech the merit is accomplished. As for 「迴向」 tr. "dedication", one takes this merit of rejoicing and 「迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以無所得故」 tr. "dedicates it to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, with nothing to be attained"〔T25 0487a08〕, turning the many goods toward the unsurpassed path. Sūtra ① establishes the thesis: 「其福最上、第一、最妙、無上、無與等者」 tr. "its merit is supreme, foremost, most wondrous, unsurpassed, and without equal"〔T25 0487a13〕—the superior cause and condition for the supremacy of the merit of rejoicing and dedication lies in this: 「聲聞、辟支佛及一切眾生布施、持戒、修定、隨喜,為自調、為自淨、為自度故」 tr. "the giving, keeping of morality, cultivation of concentration, and rejoicing of śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and all beings are for their own taming, for their own purification, for their own deliverance"〔T25 0487a14〕, whereas that of the bodhisattva 「為調一切眾生、為淨一切眾生、為度一切眾生故起」 tr. "arises for the taming of all beings, for the purification of all beings, for the deliverance of all beings"〔T25 0487a18〕. The treatise's explanation further matches these with the three trainings: 「持戒者,是自調;修禪者,是自淨;智慧者,是自度」 tr. "keeping morality is one's own taming; cultivating meditation is one's own purification; wisdom is one's own deliverance"〔T25 0488a17〕. The two vehicles settle their own affair, the bodhisattva acts for the multitude—this is the guiding principle on which the rejoicing and dedication of this chapter is established.

Sharing it with all beings · the result can be given. On the exact meaning of the sūtra's words 「與一切眾生共之」 tr. "share it with all beings", the treatise's explanation itself raises the difficulty and resolves it: 「共一切眾生者,是福德不可得與一切眾生,而果報可與」 tr. "As for sharing it with all beings: this merit cannot be given to all beings, but its result can be given"〔T25 0487c28〕—the substance of merit cannot be transferred as a gift, while the result (clothing, food, and objects of pleasure; the benefit of expounding the Dharma; the marks of becoming a buddha; the relics of the shattered body) can be given; 「是果報可與一切眾生,以果中說因故,言『福德與眾生共』」 tr. "this result can be given to all beings; because the cause is spoken of within the result, it says ‘the merit is shared with beings’"〔T25 0488a09〕. It further states: 「善法體不可與人,今直以無畏、無惱施與眾生用」 tr. "the substance of wholesome dharmas cannot be given to others; now one simply gives fearlessness and freedom from vexation for beings' use"〔T25 0488a12〕. By speaking of the cause within the result, the meaning of sharing is established.

Grasping at marks · as it is thought of, it cannot be found. The starting point of the difficulties raised in the whole chapter. Subhūti asks: taking as the object of thought the roots of goodness of the buddhas of the ten directions who have passed into extinction, one rejoices and dedicates—「若善男子取相迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,如所念可得不」 tr. "if a good man dedicates to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi grasping at marks, can it be found as it is thought of"〔T25 0487b07〕? Maitreya answers: 「若善男子取相,不得如所念」 tr. "if a good man grasps at marks, it is not found as it is thought of"〔T25 0487b10〕. Subhūti then presses the difficulty further: if 「若諸緣、諸事無所有」 tr. "the conditions and the matters are without anything existent" and yet one dedicates grasping at marks, 「是菩薩將無顛倒:無常謂常,想顛倒、心顛倒、見顛倒」 tr. "will this bodhisattva not be inverted: taking the impermanent as permanent—the inversion of perception, of mind, of view"〔T25 0487b15〕—to grasp at marks is to fall into the three inversions of perception, mind, and view; this judgement of inversion runs through the whole chapter and is gathered up in the Last Part with 「不墮想顛倒、心顛倒、見顛倒」 tr. "does not fall into the inversion of perception, of mind, of view".

Mixed with poison · right dedication. The pivotal pair of terms in the Last Part. Of dedication that grasps at marks, 「諸佛不說有大利益。何以故?是迴向雜毒故。譬如美食雜毒,雖有好色、好香,為人所貪而雜毒」 tr. "the buddhas do not say it has great benefit. Why? Because this dedication is mixed with poison. It is like fine food mixed with poison: though it has a fine colour and a fine fragrance and is craved by people, it is mixed with poison"〔T25 0492a10〕—the merit is like the food, the afflictions of craving and views that come from grasping at marks are like the poison; the food is delicious and the poison takes effect (for the sentence-by-sentence matching, see Section III). Set against it is right dedication: 「如諸佛所知無上智慧,是諸善根相、是諸善根性,我亦如是隨喜;如諸佛所知,我亦如是迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "As the buddhas know with their unsurpassed wisdom the mark of these roots of goodness and the nature of these roots of goodness, so too do I rejoice; as the buddhas know, so too do I dedicate to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi"〔T25 0492b09〕—to rejoice and dedicate according to what the buddhas know 「則為不謗佛,如佛所教、如佛法說。是菩薩摩訶薩迴向,則無雜毒」 tr. "is then not to slander the Buddha, but to be as the Buddha taught and as the Buddha's Dharma says. The dedication of this bodhisattva-mahāsattva is then without poison"〔T25 0492b13〕. Treatise ④ further judges the boundary between wrong and right: 「有相是一邊,無相是一邊,離是二邊行中道,是諸佛實相」 tr. "having marks is one extreme, being without marks is one extreme; departing from these two extremes and walking the middle way is the real mark of the buddhas"〔T25 0492c05〕.

Not bound to the three realms · dharmas are unarisen. The foundation of right dedication in Sūtra ⑤. 「如色不繫欲界、不繫色界、不繫無色界;不繫法者,不名過去、不名未來、不名現在」 tr. "Just as form is not bound to the desire realm, not bound to the form realm, not bound to the formless realm; a dharma that is not bound is not called past, not called future, not called present"〔T25 0493a25〕, and so it is for all dharmas from form up to the practice of constant equanimity; not bound to the three realms and not called by the three times, then 「不可以取相有所得法迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。何以故?是色無生。若法無生則無法,無法中不可迴向」 tr. "one cannot dedicate to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi by a dharma that grasps at marks and has something to be attained. Why? This form is unarisen. If a dharma is unarisen then there is no dharma, and where there is no dharma one cannot dedicate"〔T25 0493b16〕. Because dharmas are unarisen there is no dharma to be grasped and no dharma to be turned toward—this is the ultimate principle of signless dedication.

The signless: the three kinds of marks. Treatise ⑤ explains the enumeration of 「用無相故」 tr. "because it uses the signless": 「無相有三種:假名相、法相、無相相」 tr. "the signless has three kinds: the mark of provisional names, the mark of dharmas, and the mark of the signless"〔T25 0495b17〕—the mark of provisional names is like a cart or a house, which has a name through coming together, and ignorance grasps it and gives rise to delusion and karma; the mark of dharmas is the five aggregates, the twelve sense-fields, and the eighteen elements, seen as existent when contemplated with the fleshly eye and as non-existent when contemplated with the wisdom-eye; as for the mark of the signless, grasping the mark of the signless in turn gives rise to fetters, and so it too should not be grasped. 「離三種相,故名無相」 tr. "Because it is apart from the three kinds of marks, it is called signless"〔T25 0495b24〕. From this it runs down in a chain: 「若無有相,是中『無所得』;無得故『無出』;若法無得、無出,即是『無垢無淨』」 tr. "If there are no marks, herein there is ‘nothing to be attained’; because there is no attaining, there is ‘no going forth’; if a dharma is without attaining and without going forth, it is ‘without stain and without purity’"〔T25 0495b24〕, and so on up to the emptiness of specific marks, the ever self-nature emptiness, and being the same as the nature of dharmas, suchness, and the limit of reality.

Equal to liberation. The aspect of practice of the supreme rejoicing in Sūtra ⑤: 「布施與解脫等,戒、忍、精進、禪、智與解脫等」 tr. "giving is equal to liberation; morality, patience, vigour, meditation, and wisdom are equal to liberation"〔T25 0494c16〕, and so on: form, feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, the dharmas of the three times, the buddhas of the ten directions, the extinction of the buddhas, and the marks of all dharmas are all equal to liberation; 「我以是諸善根相隨喜功德迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,亦與解脫等,不生不滅故」 tr. "the merit of rejoicing with which I, by these marks of roots of goodness, dedicate to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi is also equal to liberation, because it neither arises nor ceases"〔T25 0494c28〕. Treatise ⑤, in its answer to the eighth question, resolves the doubt: 「凡夫人以肉眼、六識顛倒觀故見異;若以慧眼,觀諸法皆虛妄,唯涅槃為實。是有為解脫,屬無為、隨無為故名『解脫』」 tr. "Ordinary people see difference because they contemplate invertedly with the fleshly eye and the six consciousnesses; if with the wisdom-eye, one contemplates all dharmas as false, and only nirvāṇa as real. This conditioned liberation is called ‘liberation’ because it belongs to the unconditioned and follows the unconditioned"〔T25 0495c24〕—contemplated with the wisdom-eye, all dharmas are the same as the calm and extinct mark of nirvāṇa without remainder, and therefore the six perfections and the rest are equal to liberation.

III. Similes and Stories

The Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa is renowned for its similes; the principal similes of this chapter are seven, divided between the Sūtra and the Treatise sections, and they carry respectively such meanings as 「修福可仰」 tr. "one who cultivates merit is looked up to", 「機熟能受」 tr. "when the capacity is ripe one can receive", 「取相之患」 tr. "the harm of grasping at marks", and 「依佛所知」 tr. "according to what the buddhas know".

The simile of the cool full moon and the great assembly summoned (carrying the meaning 「修福之人可尊」 tr. "one who cultivates merit is to be honoured"). Treatise ① makes clear that one who cultivates merit is honoured, loved, and revered in common by all beings—「譬如熱時,清涼滿月,無不樂仰;亦如大會告集,伎樂、餚饌無不畢備,遠近諸人咸共欣赴。修福之人,亦復如是」 tr. "Just as in the hot season there is none who does not delight in looking up at the cool full moon; and just as when a great assembly is summoned, with music and delicacies all fully provided, people from near and far all gladly hasten to it—so too is one who cultivates merit"〔T25 0487c09〕. The full moon in the hot season stands for his being looked up to, the great assembly fully provided stands for all hastening to him—the reason rejoicing is merit lies precisely in the fact that the one rejoiced in is the most excellent among beings.

The simile of the great fire and the firewood (carrying the meaning 「度一切眾生故勝」 tr. "it is superior because it delivers all beings"). Treatise ① answers the question 「實不度一切眾生,何以言度一切眾生故勝」 tr. "in fact not all beings are delivered; why say it is superior because it delivers all beings"—「諸佛菩薩功德力能度一切眾生,但以眾生無和合因緣故;譬如大火常有燒力,但以薪不近,故不得燒,近則能燒」 tr. "the power of the merit of the buddhas and bodhisattvas can deliver all beings; it is only because beings lack the coming together of causes and conditions. It is like a great fire, which always has the power to burn; only because the firewood is not near does it fail to burn; if it is near, it can burn"〔T25 0488a26〕. The fire's power is always present, and if the firewood is not near it does not burn—a simile for the power of the buddhas and bodhisattvas to deliver beings being always present, while beings whose causes and conditions have not yet come together are not delivered; the power of delivering and the fact of delivering are spoken of separately; the bodhisattva's rejoicing arises for the deliverance of all beings, and its superiority is not diminished because the fact is not yet universal.

The simile of the drop of water on hot iron (carrying the meaning 「學人小錯非實顛倒」 tr. "the small errors of trainees are not real inversions"). Treatise ① distinguishes that trainees, not yet free of desire, grasp at marks of purity and give rise to fetters when their recollection lapses, 「還得正念即時滅,如經中譬喻:『如渧水墮大熱鐵上,即時消滅。』小錯故假名顛倒,非實顛倒」 tr. "and on regaining right mindfulness these at once cease, as in the simile in the sūtra: ‘Like a drop of water falling on a great hot iron, it at once vanishes.’ Because the error is small it is provisionally called inversion; it is not real inversion"〔T25 0489a04〕. The drop of water falling on hot iron, vanishing as soon as it falls, stands for the fetters of trainees arising briefly and at once ceasing—the judgement that ordinary people have three kinds of inversion and trainees two is made clear by this simile.

The simile of iron entering the furnace (carrying the meaning 「久行者心調柔」 tr. "the mind of one who has long practised is pliant"). Treatise ② explains why one who has long practised the six perfections can dedicate without grasping at marks—「譬如鐵雖堅䩕,入鑪則柔軟,隨作何器;菩薩心亦如是,久行六波羅蜜、善知識所護故,其心調柔」 tr. "Just as iron, though hard, becomes soft on entering the furnace and can be made into any vessel whatever; so too the bodhisattva's mind: because he has long practised the six perfections and is protected by the good friend, his mind is pliant"〔T25 0489b26〕. Hard iron becoming soft on entering the furnace and made into any vessel stands for the stiff and strong mind becoming tamed only after long practice, and able to give rise to signless rejoicing.

The simile of the fledgling's wings (carrying the meaning 「新學不可逼說深空」 tr. "the deep emptiness must not be forced upon those new to the training"). Treatise ② explains 「不應新學菩薩前說」 tr. "it should not be spoken before bodhisattvas new to the training"—one who has newly aroused the mind is first taught rejoicing that grasps at marks, and only when he gradually attains the power of skilful means can he practise signless rejoicing: 「譬如鳥子,羽翼未成,不可逼令高翔;六翮成就,則能遠飛」 tr. "Just as a fledgling whose wings are not yet grown cannot be forced to soar high; when its six pinions are complete, it can fly far"〔T25 0489c09〕. The wings not yet grown stand for the power of skilful means not yet complete; the six pinions complete stand for being able to practise after gradual training—the setting forth of the deep Dharma has its sequence; it is not stinginess with the Dharma.

The simile of the food mixed with poison (carrying the meaning 「取相迴向之患」 tr. "the harm of dedication that grasps at marks" · set up in the Sūtra, matched in the Treatise). Sūtra ④ sets up the simile (see Section II), and Treatise ④ matches it sentence by sentence: 「『食』是隨喜福德,『毒』是取相故愛見等諸煩惱生。『好色』者,福德因緣,作人王、轉輪王、天王,得福樂。『好香』者,得好名譽、富貴、勢力」 tr. "‘Food’ is the merit of rejoicing; ‘poison’ is the arising of the afflictions of craving, views, and the rest because of grasping at marks. ‘Fine colour’: through the causes and conditions of merit one becomes a king of humans, a wheel-turning king, a king of the gods, and obtains the pleasure of merit. ‘Fine fragrance’: one obtains a good name, wealth and honour, and power"〔T25 0492c27〕; 「愚癡人」 tr. "the foolish person" is the bodhisattva newly aroused who grasps at marks with an attached mind; 「食之歡喜」 tr. "eats it with delight" is receiving this wealth and pleasure among gods and humans; 「飯欲消時,受若死、若死等苦」 tr. "when the meal is about to be digested, he suffers death or what is equal to death" is that when the wealth and pleasure, being impermanent, break up and depart, sorrow follows and then death—and 「若死、若死等」 tr. "death or what is equal to death" opens two further layers: 「自失命根名『死』,失所著物名『死等』」 tr. "losing one's own life-faculty is called ‘death’; losing the things one is attached to is called ‘what is equal to death’"〔T25 0493a06〕; losing the life of wisdom is called death, obstructing the practice of the wholesome path is called what is equal to death. One of the densest similes of the whole chapter, it is a simile for the merit of grasping at marks: when its enjoyment is exhausted, harm arises.

The simile of shooting at the ground (carrying the meaning 「如諸佛所知隨喜必著」 tr. "rejoicing according to what the buddhas know surely hits the mark"). Treatise ④ explains that right dedication surely attains—「譬如射地,無不著時;若射餘物,或著、或不著。如諸佛所知隨喜,如射地無不著;若用餘道隨喜,如射餘物,或著、或不著」 tr. "It is like shooting at the ground: there is no time it does not hit; if one shoots at other things, sometimes it hits, sometimes it does not. Rejoicing according to what the buddhas know is like shooting at the ground, which never fails to hit; rejoicing by other paths is like shooting at other things: sometimes it hits, sometimes it does not"〔T25 0493a19〕. Shooting at the ground surely hits, shooting at things sometimes misses—a simile for this: to rejoice according to the real mark of the roots of goodness as the buddhas know it is surely to obtain real rejoicing, and the dedication is not in vain; to use other paths is sometimes to hit, sometimes to miss.

IV. The Sūtra Passage Explained

The two-type network of the chapter name: Rejoicing and Dedication / Rejoicing (different names for the same chapter · the boundary between the two types cuts obliquely through the transmission of this treatise itself · recorded side by side without judgement). In this chapter the chapter name shows two types distributed across the sides of this treatise, the sūtra explained, and the ancient masters' commentaries, and the boundary between them does not fall between 「本論 vs 所釋經」 tr. "this treatise vs the sūtra explained", but cuts obliquely through the transmission of this treatise itself. Each is recorded in turn on the basis of the base text.

First, the side of this treatise (T25n1509). For the fascicle-head title〔T25 0487a02〕 the base text (the Taishō) reads 「隨喜迴向品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication" (「大智度論釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication, the Thirty-ninth"); in its chapter-title collation notes—the Palace edition lacks the two characters 「迴向」 tr. "dedication" (the chapter name reading 「隨喜品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing"); the Shōgozō reads 「大智度論釋隨喜品第三十八」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on Rejoicing, the Thirty-eighth" (the chapter name likewise without 「迴向」 tr. "dedication", and the chapter number 「三十八」 tr. "thirty-eight", a step of -1); the Ishiyama reads 「摩訶般若波羅蜜品第三十八隨喜品」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā Chapter, the Thirty-eighth, Chapter on Rejoicing" (in the form of a sūtra title, the chapter number 「三十八」 tr. "thirty-eight", a step of -1, the same as the outlier type of the Ishiyama text in Chapter 32)—that is, within the transmission of this treatise itself, the Taishō base text holds the full name 「隨喜迴向」 tr. "Rejoicing and Dedication", while the three branches of the Palace, Shōgozō, and Ishiyama texts together hold the short name 「隨喜」 tr. "Rejoicing" (see the chapter-title group collation notes in Section VIII).

Second, the side of the sūtra explained (T223). For this chapter title in Kumārajīva's translation of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra〔T08 0297b21〕, the base text reads 「隨喜品第三十九」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing, the Thirty-ninth"; within its head, on the same line, there is further an inline collation note, whose text reads 「丹隨喜迴向品」 tr. "Khitan: Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication"—the Khitan edition (the Khitan text of the Korean Canon) has the variant name 「隨喜迴向品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication", word for word the same as the original name in the T1509 base text: it is not a new name drawn from a theme word within the chapter, but the Khitan transmission directly using the full name of this treatise's line; this is direct byte evidence for the mutual permeation of the two types across texts.

Third, the side of the ancient masters' commentaries. Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451) uses the title 「隨喜品第三十九」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing, the Thirty-ninth"〔X24n0451 0276a15〕 (the same as the T223 base-text type); Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791) gives its title consistently in three places as 「釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」 tr. "Commentary on the Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication, the Thirty-ninth" (〔X46n0791 0794b09〕 in the table of contents and〔X46n0791 0880b08〕 as the commentary title in the main text; a further one at〔X46n0791 0917b12〕 was checked as a recitation of a collation note whose target points back to the commentary title in the main text, not an independent third occurrence), completely the same type as this treatise's base text. Huiying further himself explains the origin of the two names—「按如千住婆沙釋者,應名隨喜迴向品,故彼論說言如摩訶衍隨喜迴向品中所說,今此中略故但言隨喜品,論將欲釋故舉之云第三十八品釋論也」 tr. "According to the explanation of the Thousand Abodes Vibhāṣā, it should be named the Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication; therefore that treatise says, ‘as said in the Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication of the Mahāyāna’; here it is abbreviated, and so it is simply called the Chapter on Rejoicing; since the treatise is about to explain it, it cites it, saying ‘the treatise explaining the thirty-eighth chapter’"〔X46n0791 0880b14〕 (「千住婆沙」 tr. "Thousand Abodes Vibhāṣā" as it stands in the base text, that is, a scribal transmission of the Ten Abodes Vibhāṣā)—Huiying cites that treatise's designation 「隨喜迴向品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication" to prove that the full name is correct and that 「隨喜品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing" is an abbreviation; this is an ancient master's self-attestation on the relation of the two types, recorded without judgement.

Fourth, the conclusion on the two types. Taking all sides together—the 「隨喜迴向品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication" type = this treatise's Taishō base text + Huiying in X46 + the Khitan edition (the inline note in T223); the 「隨喜品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing" type = the T223 base text + Jizang in X24 + the Palace, Shōgozō, and Ishiyama texts within this treatise's own line—the boundary between the two types cuts obliquely through the transmission of this treatise itself, and is not a simple division into 「本論全名/所釋經略名」 tr. "full name in this treatise / short name in the sūtra explained". It is judged to be a case of 「異名同品」 tr. "different names for the same chapter": the full name encompasses the two meanings 「隨喜」 tr. "rejoicing" and 「迴向」 tr. "dedication", the short name picks out the one meaning 「隨喜」 tr. "rejoicing"; it is not a misplacement, not an altered character, and not a displacement of chapter order. In this edition the chapter name follows this treatise's base text, 「隨喜迴向品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication" (the main axis for the chapter names of this edition is this treatise's base text, an established ruling; this section does not overturn it); 「隨喜品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing" and the differences among the transmissions are all kept word for word in the comparative narrative, recorded side by side without judgement.

Chapter-number -1 step (continuing an established phenomenon · this chapter forms the eighth instance · confirmed from many sides). In this treatise the Shōgozō and Ishiyama texts give the chapter number as 「第三十八」 tr. "the thirty-eighth" (see the chapter-name collation notes above), one fewer than the base text's 「三十九」 tr. "thirty-nine", in the same direction and by the same offset as the continuous -1 step in the Shōgozō / Ishiyama transmission from Chapter 32 to Chapter 38, forming the eighth instance of the -1 step in the Shōgozō / Ishiyama transmission over the whole range of Chapters 32 to 39. The confirmation in this chapter is broader in three respects. First, the chapter-number tail note at the end of the fascicle〔T25 0496a18〕—the Song edition has, beneath the character 「一」 tr. "one" of the fascicle-end title, an interlinear note 「釋第三十八品」 tr. "commentary on the thirty-eighth chapter" (a step of -1), and the Yuan edition an interlinear note 「釋第三十九品」 tr. "commentary on the thirty-ninth chapter" (the correct step); this tail note of the Song edition goes in the same direction as the Shōgozō and Ishiyama (at the chapter title the Song edition has no -1 step; it is only in this tail note—recorded as it is). Second, the chapter-title group at the boundary of the next chapter〔T25 0496a21〕—the Ishiyama reads 「般若波羅蜜品第三十九照明品」 tr. "Prajñāpāramitā Chapter, the Thirty-ninth, Chapter on Illumination", marking the next chapter, "Illumination", Chapter 40, as 「三十九」 tr. "thirty-nine", the -1 step consistent from head to tail; the Shōgozō reads 「大智度經論釋第三十九品訖第三十品上是能品」 tr. "Commentary of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa sūtra-treatise, the thirty-ninth chapter ended; thirtieth chapter, upper, the chapter of ability" (transmitted as it stands in the base text; its 「第三十九品訖」 tr. "the thirty-ninth chapter ended" does not fit the step of the Shōgozō chapter title 「第三十八」 tr. "the thirty-eighth"; the mechanism is unclear, recorded without forcing an explanation). Third, the continued self-attestation of Huiying's commentary as an ancient master—at the opening of the main text of Huiying's commentary on this chapter: 「第三十八品者,即是諸分之中大分第三,明慈氏菩薩與善吉更復復宗因隨喜迴向明於波若」 tr. "The thirty-eighth chapter is the third great division among the divisions; it makes clear that the bodhisattva Compassionate One (Maitreya) and Good Auspice (Subhūti) once more return to the tenet, by way of rejoicing and dedication making prajñā clear"〔X46n0791 0880b09〕, using 「第三十八品」 tr. "the thirty-eighth chapter" for this chapter (thirty-nine), a deviation in the same direction as his calling Chapter 38 「第三十七品」 tr. "the thirty-seventh chapter" when explaining it—the second instance of an ancient master's self-attestation of the -1 step. The Shōgozō, the Ishiyama, the tail note of the Song edition, and Huiying's commentary—four parties, each from a different source, deviating in the same direction—are recorded without judging merit; the mechanism is unclear, and no explanation is forced.

Duplicate n attribute in the T223 mulu (recorded without forcing an explanation). On the side of the sūtra explained, T223, the mulu attribute ordinal of this chapter is 「n=39」 tr. "n=39" and the displayed title is 「39 隨喜品」 tr. "39 Chapter on Rejoicing"〔T08 0297b21〕, the displayed text and the attribute agreeing; however, the mulu n= attributes over the range of Chapters 36 to 39 of T223 were further checked: the Chapter on the Honoured Guide n=37, the Chapter on the Praise of the Dharma n=37 (duplicated), the Chapter on the Gift of Dharma n=39, the Chapter on Rejoicing n=39 (duplicated)—the mulu attribute of the preceding chapter, the Chapter on the Gift of Dharma, is also n=39, duplicating the number assigned to this chapter (37 duplicated, 39 duplicated, no 38), a continuing phenomenon at the CBETA encoding layer; but the sequence of displayed chapter numbers (36 / 37 / 38 / 39) is itself continuous and without error, and the alignment takes the displayed numbers and word-for-word comparison of content as the standard; recorded as it is, and this section does not force an explanation.

Full comparative reading of the cited sūtra (two-sided collation · sentence-by-sentence check of the opening). The opening of the 【經】 of this treatise's section ① and the sūtra explained's "Rejoicing" chapter are almost word for word the same text—this treatise reads 「爾時,彌勒菩薩摩訶薩語慧命須菩提:『有菩薩摩訶薩隨喜福德,與一切眾生共之,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以無所得故』」 tr. "At that time the bodhisattva-mahāsattva Maitreya said to the venerable Subhūti: ‘There is a bodhisattva-mahāsattva who shares the merit of rejoicing with all beings and dedicates it to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, with nothing to be attained’"〔T25 0487a07〕; T223 at the same passage reads 「爾時彌勒菩薩摩訶薩語慧命須菩提:『有菩薩摩訶薩隨喜福德與一切眾生共之,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,以無所得故』」 tr. "At that time the bodhisattva-mahāsattva Maitreya said to the venerable Subhūti: ‘There is a bodhisattva-mahāsattva who shares the merit of rejoicing with all beings and dedicates it to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, with nothing to be attained’"〔T08 0297b22〕—the same opening of Maitreya addressing Subhūti, the same motif of rejoicing and dedication (differing only slightly in punctuation, not a divergence of content). It is judged to be 「異名同品」 tr. "different names for the same chapter", not a transplanting of a scene (following the two-sided collation discipline of case p21-1, the position was fixed by sentence-by-sentence comparison of the opening, not by searching one text with the words of another). The five Treatise layers of this treatise are a structural expansion in the form of a treatise; the sūtra explained has no such layer, and this is not a textual variant. The entry-by-entry statistics of the <app> witnesses on the T223 side within the scope of the comparative reading for this chapter, and a full difflib computation, were not unfolded here; the fact that they were not unfolded is recorded as it is, left to later collation to check, and no estimate is used to fill the number.

V. The Prajñā Eye

The eye of this chapter lies in the full judgement of wrong and right on the single practice of 「隨喜迴向」 tr. "rejoicing and dedication"—it begins from the thesis 「但以心隨喜、其福最上」 tr. "rejoicing with the mind alone, its merit is supreme", passes through the difficulty 「取相不得如所念」 tr. "grasping at marks, it is not found as it is thought of", the answer 「正迴向不墮三顛倒」 tr. "right dedication does not fall into the three inversions", and the judgement 「雜毒/無雜毒」 tr. "mixed with poison / without poison", and finally comes to rest in the supreme rejoicing 「與解脫等」 tr. "equal to liberation". Its meaning can be summarised in five layers.

First, rejoicing and dedication are supreme and foremost—arising for the deliverance of all beings. Maitreya establishes the thesis: the bodhisattva shares the merit of rejoicing with all beings and dedicates it to the unsurpassed path, with nothing to be attained, and 「其福最上、第一、最妙、無上、無與等者」 tr. "its merit is supreme, foremost, most wondrous, unsurpassed, and without equal"〔T25 0487a13〕. The reason for its superiority: the merit of the two vehicles and of beings is 「為自調、為自淨、為自度」 tr. "for their own taming, for their own purification, for their own deliverance", whereas the bodhisattva's merit 「為調一切眾生、為淨一切眾生、為度一切眾生故起」 tr. "arises for the taming of all beings, for the purification of all beings, for the deliverance of all beings"〔T25 0487a18〕; the treatise's explanation further makes clear its intent of checking Śakra's self-satisfaction: 「菩薩但以心隨喜,則勝聲聞、辟支佛、一切眾生布施等及諸無漏功德,何況華香、供養經卷等」 tr. "if the bodhisattva merely rejoices with the mind, he surpasses the giving and the rest of śrāvakas, pratyekabuddhas, and all beings, and all merits without outflows—how much more flowers and incense, offerings to the scroll of the sūtra, and the like"〔T25 0487c01〕—without labouring body and speech, a single thought of rejoicing surpasses all offerings; this is the thesis on which the chapter is established.

Second, the difficulty of grasping at marks—the conditions and the matters are without anything existent; will one not be inverted? Subhūti raises the difficulty with the wisdom of ultimate emptiness: the roots of goodness of the past buddhas held in thought have long since passed into extinction; 「若善男子取相,不得如所念」 tr. "if a good man grasps at marks, it is not found as it is thought of"〔T25 0487b10〕; since 「諸緣、諸事無所有」 tr. "the conditions and the matters are without anything existent" and yet one dedicates grasping at marks, will one not fall into the three inversions of perception, mind, and view that 「無常謂常」 tr. "take the impermanent as permanent"〔T25 0487b11〕? And so on up to the pressing question: 「何等是緣?何等是事?何等是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?何等是善根?何等是隨喜心迴向」 tr. "What is the condition? What is the matter? What is anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi? What are the roots of goodness? What is the mind of rejoicing that dedicates"〔T25 0487b21〕—if this difficulty is not resolved, the one practice of rejoicing and dedication falls into recollection, imagining, and discrimination; the whole latter half of the chapter is set up to answer this difficulty.

Third, right dedication—the power of skilful means of prajñā, not giving rise to the perception of a buddha, exhausted and ceased, entering the nature of dharmas. The answer to this difficulty opens on both the capacity and the Dharma: as to capacity, those who 「久行六波羅蜜、多供養諸佛、種善根、與善知識相隨、善學自相空法」 tr. "have long practised the six perfections, made many offerings to the buddhas, planted roots of goodness, kept company with the good friend, and trained well in the dharma of the emptiness of specific marks"〔T25 0489a12〕 are able to do it, and those who have newly aroused the mind are also equal to it by the two causes and conditions of sharp faculties and the good friend; as to the Dharma, 「用心隨喜功德,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,是心盡、滅、變、離」 tr. "the mind with which one rejoices in merit and dedicates to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi—this mind is exhausted, ceased, changed, and departed"〔T25 0489b04〕—in recollecting the buddhas and the Saṅgha, 「不生佛想、不生僧想,無善根想」 tr. "one does not give rise to the perception of a buddha, does not give rise to the perception of the Saṅgha, and has no perception of roots of goodness", and the dedicating mind 「亦不生心想」 tr. "also does not give rise to the perception of mind"〔T25 0490b06〕; the mind, exhausted and ceased, enters the gate of impermanence and reaches the nature of dharmas, where 「法性中無有分別是心、是非心」 tr. "within the nature of dharmas there is no discriminating ‘this is mind, this is not mind’"〔T25 0491b02〕. Treatise ④ further judges its boundary: 「有相是一邊,無相是一邊,離是二邊行中道,是諸佛實相」 tr. "having marks is one extreme, being without marks is one extreme; departing from these two extremes and walking the middle way is the real mark of the buddhas"〔T25 0492c05〕—right dedication is not abandoning dedication; it is dedicating within not grasping at marks.

Fourth, the mixed poison and shooting at the ground—the judgement of wrong and right. Dedication that grasps at marks is like fine food mixed with poison: 「愚癡之人食之歡喜」 tr. "the foolish person eats it with delight", and 「飯欲消時,受若死、若死等苦」 tr. "when the meal is about to be digested, he suffers death or what is equal to death"〔T25 0492a13〕; not truly receiving, not truly grasping the marks, not truly reciting and reading, not understanding the meaning, and teaching others dedication that grasps at marks—「則為謗佛,不隨佛教、不隨法說」 tr. "this is to slander the Buddha, not following the Buddha's teaching, not following what the Dharma says"〔T25 0492b02〕. Right dedication follows what the buddhas know: 「如諸佛所知無上智慧,是諸善根相、是諸善根性,我亦如是隨喜」 tr. "As the buddhas know with their unsurpassed wisdom the mark of these roots of goodness and the nature of these roots of goodness, so too do I rejoice"〔T25 0492b09〕—「如諸佛所知隨喜,如射地無不著;若用餘道隨喜,如射餘物,或著、或不著」 tr. "rejoicing according to what the buddhas know is like shooting at the ground, which never fails to hit; rejoicing by other paths is like shooting at other things: sometimes it hits, sometimes it does not"〔T25 0493a20〕. According to what the buddhas know, one surely obtains real rejoicing and the dedication is not in vain; according to one's own grasping at marks, the merit is exhausted and harm arises. Sūtra ⑤ further weighs step by step: the ten wholesome paths, the four dhyānas, the five supernormal powers, up to offerings as many as the sands of the Ganges, are all not equal to 「於諸善根心不著,迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "the mind not attached to the roots of goodness, dedicating to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi"〔T25 0493c15〕, and the gods' four praises say 「最大迴向……不墮二法」 tr. "the greatest dedication … does not fall into dual dharmas"〔T25 0494a14〕.

Fifth, equal to liberation—the ultimate of supreme rejoicing (where the close of the chapter comes to rest). The Buddha himself answers 「云何名隨喜最上」 tr. "what is called supreme rejoicing": recollecting the dharmas of the three times 「不取不捨、不念非不念、不得非不得」 tr. "neither grasped nor relinquished, neither thought of nor not thought of, neither found nor not found"〔T25 0494c03〕, giving and so on up to the marks of all dharmas are all 「與解脫等」 tr. "equal to liberation", and rejoicing and dedication 「亦與解脫等,不生不滅故」 tr. "are also equal to liberation, because they neither arise nor cease"〔T25 0495a01〕; Treatise ⑤ finally judges five pairs of difference—「先福德有量,今福德無量;先福德有盡,今福德無盡;先福德雜毒,今福德無毒;先福德隨生死,今福德隨涅槃;先福德不定,或作佛、或退,今福德定到,必疾作佛」 tr. "Before, the merit was measurable; now the merit is immeasurable. Before, the merit was exhaustible; now the merit is inexhaustible. Before, the merit was mixed with poison; now the merit is without poison. Before, the merit followed birth and death; now the merit follows nirvāṇa. Before, the merit was not fixed—one might make a buddha or might fall back; now the merit is fixed in its arrival, and one is sure to make a buddha quickly"〔T25 0496a09〕—and concludes with the four kinds of people: 「若凡夫人求世間樂,若聲聞、辟支佛人求涅槃樂,若諸菩薩摩訶薩求佛樂」 tr. "whether ordinary people seeking worldly pleasure, or śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas seeking the pleasure of nirvāṇa, or bodhisattva-mahāsattvas seeking the pleasure of buddhahood"〔T25 0496a14〕. A single thought of rejoicing, dedicated with nothing to be attained, surpasses practice with something to be attained for immeasurable kalpas—the one sentence 「應如是隨喜生福德迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,如此品中說」 tr. "one should thus rejoice, give rise to merit, and dedicate it to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, as is said in this chapter"〔T25 0496a16〕 closes the whole chapter, running from beginning to end with the first layer of this eye.

VI. Divergent Readings of the Masters

The Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa has no tradition of a complete line-by-line commentary; the ancient masters' citations and explanations lean wherever the material happens to fall. The ancient masters' rereading of this chapter is of three kinds: Jizang's commentary, which explains the sūtra being explained, preserves a complete dedicated section; Huiying's commentary, which explains the treatise, covers Fascicle 61, to which this chapter belongs; and Junzheng's book also has one citation by name (its first appearance in this chapter, after consecutive zero hits in Chapters 37 and 38). This section records the correspondence between what each commented on or cited and this chapter, and does not judge the relative merit of the interpretations.

Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451). Its line-by-line commentary on the sūtra explained's "Rejoicing" chapter begins at〔X24n0451 0276a15〕 (mulu 「隨喜品第三十九」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing, the Thirty-ninth") and runs to just before〔X24n0451 0280a11〕 (before the start of the next mulu, 「照明品第四十」 tr. "Chapter on Illumination, the Fortieth"; this section determines it by the continuous sequence of the mulu; occurrences of the word 「隨喜」 tr. "rejoicing" still seen after 0280a11 belong to continued use in the text of the next chapter, not to the commentary section on this chapter), covering the whole of the sūtra of this chapter. Four points are worth recording. First, the overall judgement of the chapter's position—「九品半經開為二段,前八品半經受持讀誦書寫解說乃至供養般若故其福無邊,今一品明直依般若嘿念隨喜不動身口得福無邊」 tr. "The sūtra of nine and a half chapters is opened into two sections: the preceding eight and a half chapters of the sūtra make clear that by receiving and upholding, reading and reciting, writing out and explaining, and so on up to making offerings to prajñā, its merit is boundless; now this one chapter makes clear that directly relying on prajñā, silently recollecting and rejoicing, without moving body and speech, one obtains boundless merit"〔X24n0451 0276a16〕: Jizang places this chapter, with 「不動身口、嘿念隨喜」 tr. "not moving body and speech, silently recollecting and rejoicing", above the merit of offering, upholding, and expounding in the preceding eight and a half chapters, corresponding to this treatise's meaning of 「不勞身、口業」 tr. "without labouring the karma of body and speech". Second, the two meanings of its arising—「二者、上明香華等供養得無邊福,天主自慶此是我等能辦非出家人所有,今欲報其自多之情,明起一隨喜則其福無邊」 tr. "Second: above it was made clear that offerings of incense, flowers, and the like obtain boundless merit, and the lord of the gods congratulated himself that this was something they could accomplish and not something possessed by those who have gone forth; now, wishing to answer his self-satisfaction, it makes clear that if one gives rise to a single rejoicing its merit is boundless"〔X24n0451 0276a22〕: its 「報其自多之情」 tr. "answer his self-satisfaction" meets meaning for meaning this treatise's Treatise ① 「彌勒欲抑其自多之情」 tr. "Maitreya wished to check his self-satisfaction"〔T25 0487b29〕; the ancient master read out the same arrangement. Third, the distinction between rejoicing and dedication—「於他功德則生隨喜,自之功德則宜迴向,他功德不可迴向,但有發願令迴向也」 tr. "In regard to the merit of others one gives rise to rejoicing; one's own merit should be dedicated; the merit of others cannot be dedicated—one can only make a vow that it be dedicated"〔X24n0451 0276b07〕, and he further opens four propositions on rejoicing (whether what is rejoiced in is with something to be attained or with nothing to be attained, and whether the rejoicing mind is with something to be attained or with nothing to be attained). Fourth, the distinction between rejoicing and repentance—「問:隨喜如是,懺悔云何?答:如般若觀隨喜,無福不生,無罪不滅」 tr. "Question: rejoicing is thus; what of repentance? Answer: when rejoicing is contemplated as prajñā contemplates, there is no merit that does not arise and no sin that is not extinguished"〔X24n0451 0276c01〕: in this section Jizang specifically distinguishes the relation among the three practices of rejoicing, dedication, and repentance, which has direct citation value for the Exposition layer at the drafting stage.

Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791). It is the only ancient commentary explaining this treatise, and survives only in fragmentary fascicles; Fascicle 61 of the treatise, to which this chapter belongs, falls precisely within its coverage (continuing the coverage of the preceding chapter). Its line-by-line commentary on this chapter begins at〔X46n0791 0880b08〕 (the commentary title 「釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」 tr. "Commentary on the Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication, the Thirty-ninth", immediately after the preceding chapter) and covers the treatise part of this chapter (the range of its start and end in the main text and its section-by-section correspondence with the passages within the chapter were not checked section by section here; the gap is recorded as it is). Three points are worth recording. First, the great judgement of the chapter's position—「第三十八品者,即是諸分之中大分第三,明慈氏菩薩與善吉更復復宗因隨喜迴向明於波若」 tr. "The thirty-eighth chapter is the third great division among the divisions; it makes clear that the bodhisattva Compassionate One (Maitreya) and Good Auspice (Subhūti) once more return to the tenet, by way of rejoicing and dedication making prajñā clear"〔X46n0791 0880b09〕: Huiying judges this chapter to be the 「諸分之中大分第三」 tr. "third great division among the divisions" of his scheme, and makes clear the structure of paired exchange in which Maitreya (the Compassionate One) and Subhūti (Good Auspice) 「復宗」 tr. "return to the tenet", by way of rejoicing and dedication making prajñā clear. Second, the reason for the sequence—「何故次校量之後明隨喜等義?論隨喜者,要須以諸功德用為隨喜,上教量分中既應明功德不可思量,今欲以上來功德普一切共迴向佛道,故次校量之後明隨喜等義」 tr. "Why, after the weighing, is the meaning of rejoicing and the rest made clear? In discussing rejoicing, one must take the various merits as what is rejoiced in; above, in the division on weighing, it was made clear that merit is inconceivable and immeasurable; now, wishing to share all the merits spoken of so far universally with all and dedicate them to the Buddha path, therefore after the weighing the meaning of rejoicing and the rest is made clear"〔X46n0791 0880b10〕: the chapters on weighing make merit clear, this chapter dedicates the merit—explaining how the chapter order arises one from another. Third, the self-attestation on the chapter name and the -1 step—he cites the Ten Abodes Vibhāṣā to prove that 「應名隨喜迴向品」 tr. "it should be named the Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication", while T223 「略故但言隨喜品」 tr. "abbreviates, and so simply says Chapter on Rejoicing" (for the citation see Section IV), and he uses 「第三十八品」 tr. "the thirty-eighth chapter" for this chapter (the ancient master's self-attestation of the -1 step; see Section IV); both are the ancient-master basis for the network of chapter names of this chapter.

Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784) · an ancient master of the Three Treatise school of the Sui. A search back through the whole book for 「隨喜迴向品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication" yields zero hits, and for 「隨喜品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing" one hit—「又大品經第十一隨喜品問彌勒菩薩云:未來有當果脩行,得汝所念,得此果不?菩薩答云:不得也」 tr. "Further, in the Larger Sūtra, eleventh, the Chapter on Rejoicing asks the bodhisattva Maitreya: ‘In the future there is practice toward a result to come; obtaining what you have in mind, does one obtain this result?’ The bodhisattva answers: ‘It is not obtained.’"〔X46n0784 0611b11〕: Junzheng explicitly names 「大品經第十一隨喜品」 tr. "the Larger Sūtra, eleventh, Chapter on Rejoicing", summarising the exchange of Sūtra ① of this chapter—Subhūti's (in the sūtra text it is in fact Subhūti who asks Maitreya) 「如所念可得不」 tr. "can it be found as it is thought of" and Maitreya's answer 「不得如所念」 tr. "it is not found as it is thought of"—in support of his own meaning (his wording sums up the questioner as 「問彌勒菩薩」 tr. "asks the bodhisattva Maitreya", which is a citation of the gist, not a word-for-word citation of the sūtra; 「第十一」 tr. "eleventh" is his designation of the fascicle number on which he relies)—after consecutive zero hits in Chapters 37 and 38, Junzheng cites this chapter by name for the first time; recorded as it is.

VII. Cross-reading and Further Resonances

On the line of meaning of this chapter, four points carry on before and after; all are recorded in this section, and no reading is fixed on anyone's behalf.

First, the further resonance of 「帝釋供養福→彌勒隨喜勝」 tr. "Śakra's merit of offering → Maitreya's rejoicing is superior" (carrying on the line of the preceding chapters · recorded without judgement). The three preceding chapters (on offering, on the relics, on the gift of Dharma) weigh the merit of offering to prajñā through the dialogue between the Buddha and Śakra; in this chapter the axis turns—Treatise ① itself makes it clear: 「先七品中,佛命須菩提令說般若,中間帝釋多問、多說功德事。今彌勒順佛本意,還欲令須菩提因隨喜法廣說般若波羅蜜」 tr. "In the preceding seven chapters, the Buddha commanded Subhūti to expound prajñā; in between, Śakra asked much and spoke much about matters of merit. Now Maitreya, following the Buddha's original intent, wishes again to have Subhūti expound prajñāpāramitā at length by way of the dharma of rejoicing"〔T25 0487b24〕, and Maitreya 「欲抑其自多之情」 tr. "wished to check his self-satisfaction"〔T25 0487b29〕 and made clear that rejoicing with the mind surpasses offerings of flowers and incense—from the weighing of offerings of wealth and of Dharma it runs down to the weighing of a single thought of rejoicing; the preceding chapters make clear that the merit of offering to prajñā is great, this chapter makes clear that rejoicing and dedication is higher still; the line of weighing carries on, while the speaker structure turns to the paired exchange of Maitreya and Subhūti.

Second, cross-reading within the treatise of 「破生品」 tr. "Chapter on Refuting Arising" (a hard link within this treatise itself · recorded without judgement). Treatise ⑤ explains that form's going beyond the three realms is the real mark of form—「是色出三界者,即是色實相,初、後生相不可得,如〈破生品〉中說」 tr. "This form's going beyond the three realms is the real mark of form; the mark of arising, first and last, is unfindable, as is said in the chapter ‘Refuting Arising’"〔T25 0495a27〕: the treatise-author himself points to the meaning of non-arising in the chapter "Refuting Arising" in the earlier part of this treatise as the basis here for 「法無生則無法、無法中不可迴向」 tr. "if a dharma is unarisen there is no dharma; where there is no dharma one cannot dedicate"; the further resonance within the treatise forms a chain of its own, and this section records its trace.

Third, later citations (the line of the five repentances in Tiantai calming and contemplation · thematic association and near word-for-word adoption recorded side by side in separate layers). The two sections on rejoicing and dedication in the chapter on the five repentances of Zhiyi's Great Calming and Contemplation are deeply connected with the line of meaning of this chapter—its section on rejoicing explicitly names what it relies on: 「《法華》隨喜法、《大品》隨喜人,人、法互舉耳」 tr. "the Lotus rejoices in the Dharma, the Larger Sūtra rejoices in persons; persons and Dharma are simply raised in turn"〔T46n1911 0098b21〕 (「《大品》隨喜」 tr. "the rejoicing of the Larger Sūtra" refers to the sūtra explained in this chapter); its section on right dedication, 「正迴向者:斷三界道,滅諸戲論,乾煩惱泥,滅棘刺林,捨除重檐;不取、不念、不見、不得、不分別」 tr. "Right dedication: cutting off the path of the three realms, extinguishing all idle discourse, drying the mud of the afflictions, destroying the forest of thorns, casting off the heavy burden; not grasping, not thinking of, not seeing, not finding, not discriminating"〔T46n1911 0098b26〕, takes its meaning from the passage of praise in Treatise ③ of this chapter—「斷生死道」 tr. "cutting off the path of birth and death", 「滅諸戲論」 tr. "extinguishing all idle discourse", 「棄重擔」 tr. "casting away the heavy burden"〔T25 0491a01〕—and from Sūtra ⑤'s 「不取不捨、不念非不念」 tr. "neither grasped nor relinquished, neither thought of nor not thought of", while the wording is not word for word; as for 「我順諸法,隨喜迴向,如三世諸佛所知、所見、所許。是名『真實正迴向』」 tr. "I, according with all dharmas, rejoice and dedicate as the buddhas of the three times know, see, and permit. This is called ‘true right dedication’"〔T46n1911 0098c01〕, this is an adoption of the meaning of this chapter's 「如諸佛所知,我亦如是迴向」 tr. "as the buddhas know, so too do I dedicate"〔T25 0492b10〕; the triple 「所知、所見、所許」 tr. "know, see, and permit" is Zhiyi's own elaboration, not word for word from this chapter—a thematic association is recorded, without judging it a word-for-word citation. Zhanran's Supporting Practice and Broad Resolution of Calming and Contemplation, explaining this passage, has one near word-for-word adoption and one explicitly named citation: 「以善法體不可與人。故今直以無畏無惱。以施眾生」 tr. "because the substance of wholesome dharmas cannot be given to others, therefore now one simply gives fearlessness and freedom from vexation to beings"〔T46n1912 0383c07〕 is a near word-for-word adoption of this chapter's Treatise ① 「善法體不可與人,今直以無畏、無惱施與眾生用」 tr. "the substance of wholesome dharmas cannot be given to others; now one simply gives fearlessness and freedom from vexation for beings' use"〔T25 0488a12〕 (the seven consecutive characters 「善法體不可與人」 tr. "the substance of wholesome dharmas cannot be given to others" match byte for byte); further, 「大論問曰。何故名二乘為自調自淨自度。而不迴向。答。戒為自調禪為自淨慧為自度」 tr. "The Great Treatise asks: why are the two vehicles called their own taming, their own purification, their own deliverance, and do not dedicate? Answer: morality is their own taming, meditation is their own purification, wisdom is their own deliverance"〔T46n1912 0383c17〕 explicitly names the 「大論」 tr. "Great Treatise", summarising the meaning of this chapter's Treatise ① 「持戒者,是自調;修禪者,是自淨;智慧者,是自度」 tr. "keeping morality is one's own taming; cultivating meditation is one's own purification; wisdom is one's own deliverance"〔T25 0488a17〕 (the order of the wording differs slightly; a citation of the gist). As for his simile of the skilled craftsman and the one wielding the axe, 「如巧匠指示倍得價直。執斧之人倍用功力」 tr. "like a skilled craftsman who, by pointing out, obtains double the price, while the one who wields the axe spends double the effort"〔T46n1912 0383c14〕, a search back in the source text of the two units of this chapter for 「巧匠」 tr. "skilled craftsman" and 「執斧」 tr. "wields the axe" yields zero hits for both—Zhanran set up the simile himself or has some other source; a thematic association is recorded, not attached to this chapter, without judging it a word-for-word citation.

Fourth, linking into the treasury (stable citation · soft citation). This chapter's judgement of the poison in 「取相迴向」 tr. "dedication that grasps at marks", its method of right dedication 「如諸佛所知,我亦如是迴向」 tr. "as the buddhas know, so too do I dedicate", and its supreme rejoicing 「與解脫等」 tr. "equal to liberation" are the sūtra and treatise basis for the Mahāyāna meaning of dedication, and are fixed at the stable citation〔T25n1509 隨喜迴向品·卷六十一〕; the places where the Heart Sūtra / the Diamond Sūtra / the Consciousness-only mirror cite this treatise are not yet finalised, so the citation is soft, awaiting word-for-word verification that it is preserved there. This belongs to the further resonances of the meaning of prajñā running down through the sūtras; recorded without judgement.

VIII. Witnesses and Editions

The base text of this chapter is Fascicle 61 of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa〔T25 0487a02–0496a21〕 (the main text of the chapter body begins from the chapter title〔T25 0487a02〕 and ends at the line of the fascicle-end title 「大智度論卷第六十一」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Sixty-one"〔T25 0496a18〕; the next chapter, "Illumination", Chapter 40, continues in the following fascicle, and the collation notes of the chapter-title group at the boundary of the next chapter are fixed at〔T25 0496a21〕); the collation text for the sūtra explained is the "Rejoicing" chapter of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra〔T08 0297b21 起〕; the ancient-master commentary texts for collation are Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451, covering this chapter at〔X24n0451 0276a15–0280a11〕, up to just before the end point) and Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791, covering this chapter from〔X46n0791 0880b08 起〕), while Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784) has one citation by name〔X46n0784 0611b11〕 (see Section VI). The variant collation notes follow the Taishō collation, covering differences between the Taishō base text and the Song, Yuan, Ming, Palace, Shōgozō, and Ishiyama (the Ishiyama-dera manuscript) texts, as well as the Korean Canon (K) and CBETA's collation.

Collation notes on the chapter-name / fascicle-title group (the evidential basis for the two-type network and the -1 step · listed separately). The collation notes on the fascicle-title group at the head of the chapter〔T25 0487a02〕 set out the variant texts of the chapter name together—its general entry reads 「大智度論釋隨喜迴向品第三十九【大】|大智度論釋隨喜品第三十八【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第三十八隨喜品【石】」 tr. "‘Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication, the Thirty-ninth’ in the Taishō; ‘Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on Rejoicing, the Thirty-eighth’ in the Shōgozō; ‘Mahāprajñāpāramitā Chapter, the Thirty-eighth, Chapter on Rejoicing’ in the Ishiyama", and it is further split out as 「迴向【大】|〔-〕【宮】」 tr. "‘dedication’ in the Taishō; [absent] in the Palace" (the Palace chapter name lacks 「迴向」 tr. "dedication"); as for the two entries on the authorship and translation signatures—both are absent in the Shōgozō and Ishiyama, and the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace read 「龍樹菩薩造」 tr. "composed by the bodhisattva Nāgārjuna" and 「姚秦三藏法師鳩摩羅什譯」 tr. "translated by the Tripiṭaka Dharma master Kumārajīva of the Yao Qin". Taken together with the T223 side's base text 「隨喜品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing" and the Khitan edition's inline note 「隨喜迴向品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication", the X24 title 「隨喜品第三十九」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing, the Thirty-ninth", and the X46 title 「釋隨喜迴向品第三十九」 tr. "Commentary on the Chapter on Rejoicing and Dedication, the Thirty-ninth" and body 「第三十八品」 tr. "the thirty-eighth chapter", these are the evidential basis for the two-type network of chapter names and the -1 step—recorded side by side as they are, without forcing a reconciliation.

Collation notes at the fascicle end and at the boundary of the next chapter (the -1-step tail note of the Song edition · the Shōgozō and Ishiyama at the boundary of the next chapter · listed separately). At the fascicle end〔T25 0496a18〕—「一【大】|一(釋第三十八品)夾註【宋】|一(釋第三十九品)夾註【元】」 tr. "‘one’ in the Taishō; ‘one (commentary on the thirty-eighth chapter)’ as an interlinear note in the Song; ‘one (commentary on the thirty-ninth chapter)’ as an interlinear note in the Yuan": the Song edition records beneath the fascicle-end title 「釋第三十八品」 tr. "commentary on the thirty-eighth chapter", whose chapter number does not agree with the base text's 「三十九」 tr. "thirty-nine" (a step of -1), while the Yuan records 「釋第三十九品」 tr. "commentary on the thirty-ninth chapter" at the correct step—this is the Song edition's confirmation of the -1 step at the layer of the fascicle-end tail note (at its chapter title there is no -1 step). At the boundary of the next chapter〔T25 0496a21〕—「大智度論釋照明品第四十【大】|大智度經論釋第三十九品訖第三十品上是能品【聖】|般若波羅蜜品第三十九照明品【石】」 tr. "‘Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on Illumination, the Fortieth’ in the Taishō; ‘Commentary of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa sūtra-treatise, the thirty-ninth chapter ended; thirtieth chapter, upper, the chapter of ability’ in the Shōgozō; ‘Prajñāpāramitā Chapter, the Thirty-ninth, Chapter on Illumination’ in the Ishiyama": the Ishiyama marks the next chapter as 「三十九」 tr. "thirty-nine" (the -1 step in sūtra-title form, consistent from head to tail); the Shōgozō is transmitted as it stands in the base text, as above, recorded without forcing an explanation. All are evidential bases bearing on the counting of chapter numbers; see Section IV.

The interlinear-note entry on the three sections of homage to the Buddha · the CBETA compound entry (listed separately). For the sentence of Treatise ⑤ 「菩薩禮佛有三品」 tr. "the bodhisattva's homage to the Buddha has three sections"〔T25 0495b09〕—the collation note records that the twenty-six characters from 「菩薩」 tr. "bodhisattva" through 「請諸佛品」 tr. "the section on entreating the buddhas" are in all of the Song, Yuan, Ming, Palace, and Shōgozō an interlinear note (in the Shōgozō, beneath the character 「品」 tr. "section" there is the character 「也」 tr. "ye (a final particle)"), that is, these five texts take this sentence as a note and not as main text; for the same sentence, 「三【大】|五【宮】」 tr. "‘three’ in the Taishō; ‘five’ in the Palace", the Palace edition reads 「禮佛有五品」 tr. "homage to the Buddha has five sections"—the readings of the variant texts are preserved side by side, and the main text still follows the reading 「三品」 tr. "three sections" of the current base text. Further, for the sentence of the eighth question〔T25 0495c22〕, 「名【大】|各【CB】【麗-CB】【宮】【石】」 tr. "‘name’ in the Taishō; ‘each’ in CB, in the Korean Canon as corrected by CB, in the Palace, and in the Ishiyama"—CBETA, following the Korean Canon (K14n0549_p1114c05), corrects 「名」 tr. "name" to 「各」 tr. "each" (「各各相」 tr. "each its own mark"), a compound entry bearing the Korean Canon page as its source, unlike the ordinary side-by-side setting of variant readings, and so it is listed separately.

Complete ledger of collation notes (all two hundred and six entries reconciled · as they stand in the base text). Below, transcribed as they stand from the working base text: the collation notes of this chapter total two hundred and six (one hundred and seven anchored in the First Part itself · seventy-seven anchored in the Last Part itself · twenty-two star-corresp, agreeing mechanically with app 206 at the head of the working base text and with the tool value of extract --check), in which the collation notes anchored in this chapter itself (own) and the refrain-recursive repeated citations within the chapter (star-corresp) are listed together; the readings of the variant texts are preserved side by side, while the main text still follows the reading of the current base text. The star entries of this chapter number twenty-two in all, and their corresp targets are all existing seven-digit numeric note ids within the chapter (a different processing path from the hex-tail format of Chapter 38; the star-corresp of this chapter resolve directly to numeric targets, the method being recorded in the preparatory materials); the loc listed is the line to which the corresp target belongs, and the target is marked with each entry, without fabrication:

First Part (one hundred and seven entries anchored in the unit itself)

  • 〔T25 0487a02〕大智度論釋隨喜迴向品第三十九【大】|大智度論釋隨喜品第三十八【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第三十八隨喜品【石】(core of the chapter-name / fascicle-title group · the Shōgozō chapter name lacks 「迴向」 tr. "dedication" and its chapter number is a step of -1 · the Ishiyama in sūtra-title form, a step of -1 · see Section IV)
  • 〔T25 0487a02〕迴向【大】|〔-〕【宮】(chapter name · the Palace lacks the two characters 「迴向」 tr. "dedication" = the Palace chapter name reads 「隨喜品」 tr. "Chapter on Rejoicing" · see Section IV)
  • 〔T25 0487a05〕聖者龍樹造【大】|龍樹菩薩造【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|〔-〕【聖】【石】(difference in the authorship signature · absent in the Shōgozō and Ishiyama)
  • 〔T25 0487a06〕後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】|姚秦三藏法師鳩摩羅什譯【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(difference in the translation signature · absent in the Shōgozō and Ishiyama)
  • 〔T25 0487a07〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0487a10〕一切【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0487a10〕福【大】|〔-〕【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0487a14〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487a15〕所【大】|起所【元】【明】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0487a20〕言【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487a21〕是佛【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487a22〕至【大】|乃至【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0487a22〕乃至【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487a25〕持戒【大】|若持戒【石】
  • 〔T25 0487a25〕福德【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487a25〕修定【大】|若修定【石】
  • 〔T25 0487a27〕及【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0487b01〕根【大】|眾【明】
  • 〔T25 0487b02〕福【大】|功【石】
  • 〔T25 0487b06〕是心【大】|心是【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0487b11〕諸緣、諸事【大】|諸事諸緣【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487b13〕辟支佛【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487b21〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0487b23〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0487c01〕其【大】|甚【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487c03〕等【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0487c10〕告【大】|先【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0487c11〕欣赴【大】|作起【聖】
  • 〔T25 0487c16〕所【大】|所共【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0487c22〕樂【大】|安隱【石】
  • 〔T25 0487c26〕慧【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488a05〕種【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488a07〕事【大】|乘【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488a12〕直【大】|但【石】
  • 〔T25 0488a12〕惱【大】|總【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488a13〕義【大】|此義【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488a15〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488a19〕命【大】|念【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488b11〕相【大】|想【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488b12〕無【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488b17〕去【大】|至【石】
  • 〔T25 0488b17〕諸【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488b20〕心、【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488b24〕功【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488b29〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488c04〕說【大】|諸【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488c07〕度【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0488c09〕種【大】|種種【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488c13〕起【大】|趣【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488c13〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0488c14〕隨喜【大】|隨喜者【石】
  • 〔T25 0488c16〕六【大】|八【宮】
  • 〔T25 0488c17〕起【大】|念【石】
  • 〔T25 0488c21〕若【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0488c27〕而【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0489a04〕相【大】|想【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0489a09〕亦【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0489a16〕以不【大】|不以【石】
  • 〔T25 0489a26〕亡【大】|忘【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0489a27〕護【大】|誰【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489a29〕義【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489b06〕是【大】|有【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489b12〕無有【大】|有無【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489b13〕菩提【大】|菩提亦【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0489b17〕隨喜心【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|而隨喜心【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0489b19〕是【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0489b25〕諸【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0489b25〕雖【大】|離【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489b29〕不【大】|不能【石】
  • 〔T25 0489b29〕能【大】|法【石】
  • 〔T25 0489c01〕不二【大】|不二法【元】【明】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0489c02〕名【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0489c07〕善【大】|前【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489c11〕久【大】|人【宮】|久人【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0489c17〕況【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0489c18〕法【大】|法法【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0489c24〕緣事【大】|事緣【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490a15〕授【大】|捨【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490a21〕菩薩【大】|菩薩法【石】
  • 〔T25 0490a22〕乃【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490a25〕生死【大】|〔-〕【宮】【石】
  • 〔T25 0490a28〕以【大】|用【石】
  • 〔T25 0490a29〕喜【大】|盡【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490a29〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】|應隨喜隨喜已【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490b04〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490b15〕處【大】|處及【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0490b15〕如是【大】|如是滅【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0490b16〕邪【大】|耶【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490b24〕功德【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0490b26〕知是【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0490b27〕法【大】|法是【元】【明】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0490c06〕耶【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0490c07〕答【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0490c25〕減【大】|損【石】
  • 〔T25 0490c27〕所【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491a05〕故【大】|故故【元】【明】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0491a11〕如【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0491a12〕屐【大】|跋【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491a12〕滅【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0491a12〕五分【大】|分五【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491a13〕分五【大】|五分【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491a20〕作【大】|非【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0491a24〕想【大】|相【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491a24〕想【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491b20〕況【大】|何況【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0491b21〕是【大】|是故【石】
  • 〔T25 0491b22〕墮【大】|隨【聖】

Last Part (seventy-seven entries anchored in the unit itself)

  • 〔T25 0491b24〕起【大】|作【石】
  • 〔T25 0491b25〕亦知【大】|離亦知離【石】
  • 〔T25 0491b25〕離【大】|雖【聖】
  • 〔T25 0491b29〕若【大】|若是【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0491c06〕檀波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0491c18〕作【大】|亦【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0491c21〕諸【大】|諸法【石】
  • 〔T25 0492a05〕如【大】|以【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0492a09〕得、【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0492a11〕美【大】|義【聖】
  • 〔T25 0492a12〕而【大】|而其【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0492a14〕誦讀【大】|讀誦【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0492a16〕未來、現在十方【大】|十方未來現在【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0492a16〕已【大】|以【石】
  • 〔T25 0492a22〕世界【大】|國土【石】
  • 〔T25 0492b01〕動【大】|勳【聖】
  • 〔T25 0492b08〕諸【大】|修諸【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0492b18〕諸法【大】|諸法者【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0492b23〕是【大】|是名【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0492b29〕自相【大】|相自【石】
  • 〔T25 0492c07〕不墮【大】|不墮無【聖】
  • 〔T25 0492c11〕以【大】|知【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493a03〕於【大】|相【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493a03〕受【大】|愛【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493a06〕根【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493a08〕名「死【大】|死名【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493a11〕逗【大】|讀【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0493a14〕意【大】|心【石】
  • 〔T25 0493a20〕餘物【大】|物餘【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493a23〕佛【大】|諸佛【石】
  • 〔T25 0493a24〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493b09〕無【大】|不【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493b12〕如【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0493b16〕不【大】|不名【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493b17〕法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493b20〕無【大】|不【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493b20〕錯謬【大】|謬錯【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493b24〕法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493b25〕無【大】|不【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493c07〕是【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0493c07〕是法相【大】|是法是法相【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0493c08〕讚【大】|語【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493c13〕定【大】|空【聖】
  • 〔T25 0493c16〕最上【大】|須菩提是善男子善女人福德最上【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0494a03〕告【大】|語【石】
  • 〔T25 0494a06〕等【大】|等者【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0494a07〕千【大】|千萬【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0494a07〕倍【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0494a13〕子【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0494a17〕無數【大】|無數百千億【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0494a18〕瓔珞【大】|纓絡【聖】
  • 〔T25 0494a18〕香【大】|百【聖】
  • 〔T25 0494a19〕作【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0494a19〕如【大】|〔-〕【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0494a23〕刪【大】|珊【元】【明】|那【聖】
  • 〔T25 0494a28〕王【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0494a29〕作【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0494b29〕說【大】|所說【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0494c03〕念【大】|於【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0495a03〕是【大】|如是【聖】
  • 〔T25 0495a14〕時【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0495a14〕不【大】|無【石】
  • 〔T25 0495a14〕法【大】|法故【聖】
  • 〔T25 0495a17〕及【大】|及能【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0495a20〕迴向【大】|如是迴向【石】
  • 〔T25 0495b09〕菩薩禮佛有三品,一者悔過品,二者隨喜迴向品,三者勸請諸佛品【大】|the twenty-six characters from 「菩薩」 tr. "bodhisattva" through 「請諸佛品」 tr. "the section on entreating the buddhas" are an interlinear note in all of the Song, Yuan, Ming, Palace, and Shōgozō; in the Shōgozō, beneath the character 「品」 tr. "section" there is the character 「也」 tr. "ye (a final particle)" (the collation note transmitted as it stands · listed separately in Section VIII)
  • 〔T25 0495b09〕三【大】|五【宮】(the Palace reads 「禮佛有五品」 tr. "homage to the Buddha has five sections" · listed separately)
  • 〔T25 0495c05〕天【大】|人【石】
  • 〔T25 0495c21〕常【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0495c22〕名【大】|各【CB】【麗-CB】【宮】【石】(CBETA, following the Korean Canon, corrects 「名」 tr. "name" to 「各」 tr. "each" · compound entry · bearing the Korean Canon source K14n0549_p1114c05 · listed separately)
  • 〔T25 0496a02〕心識【大】|諸【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0496a07〕集【大】|進【宋】【宮】|習【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0496a10〕今【大】|是【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0496a14〕種【大】|福【聖】
  • 〔T25 0496a15〕人【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0496a18〕一【大】|一(釋第三十八品)夾註【宋】|一(釋第三十九品)夾註【元】(chapter-number tail note at the fascicle end · the Song 「三十八」 tr. "thirty-eight", a step of -1 · the Yuan 「三十九」 tr. "thirty-nine", the correct step · see Section IV)
  • 〔T25 0496a21〕大智度論釋照明品第四十【大】|大智度經論釋第三十九品訖第三十品上是能品【聖】|般若波羅蜜品第三十九照明品【石】(chapter-title group at the boundary of the next chapter · the Ishiyama in sūtra-title form, a step of -1, 「三十九」 tr. "thirty-nine" · see Section IV)

Star-corresp repeated citations (twenty-two entries · across the two units · the listed loc = the line to which the corresp target belongs)

  • 〔T25 0487a14〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0487008))
  • 〔T25 0487a07〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0487005))
  • 〔T25 0487b23〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0487024))
  • 〔T25 0487a07〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0487005))
  • 〔T25 0490b04〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0490008))
  • 〔T25 0487b23〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0487024))
  • 〔T25 0490b16〕邪【大】|耶【聖】(star · corresp → note(0490011))
  • 〔T25 0491a24〕想【大】|相【宋】【宮】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0491008))
  • 〔T25 0491a24〕想【大】|相【宋】【宮】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0491008))
  • 〔T25 0491a24〕想【大】|相【宋】【宮】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0491008))
  • 〔T25 0487a07〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0487005))
  • 〔T25 0492a11〕美【大】|義【聖】(star · corresp → note(0492003))
  • 〔T25 0487b23〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0487024))
  • 〔T25 0490b16〕邪【大】|耶【聖】(star · corresp → note(0490011))
  • 〔T25 0490b16〕邪【大】|耶【聖】(star · corresp → note(0490011))
  • 〔T25 0490b16〕邪【大】|耶【聖】(star · corresp → note(0490011))
  • 〔T25 0493b20〕無【大】|不【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0493015))
  • 〔T25 0492a22〕世界【大】|國土【石】(star · corresp → note(0492008))
  • 〔T25 0492a22〕世界【大】|國土【石】(star · corresp → note(0492008))
  • 〔T25 0494a19〕作【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0494009))
  • 〔T25 0494a19〕作【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0494009))
  • 〔T25 0487b23〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0487024)) These two hundred and six entries agree mechanically with the count of the anchored collation notes in the working base text (own and star-corresp listed together as above, the target of each star marked with its entry, each checked entry by entry). The several places bearing on the chapter name and the fascicle title (the chapter-title group〔0487a02〕, the Song and Yuan interlinear notes at the fascicle end〔0496a18〕, and the Shōgozō / Ishiyama group at the boundary of the next chapter〔0496a21〕) have been listed separately above, and collated in both directions against the sūtra explained and the ancient masters' commentaries (Section IV, Section VI).

Witness statistics for the sūtra explained (not unfolded · the gap recorded for later supplementing). The entry-by-entry statistics of the <app> witnesses on the T223 side within the scope of the comparative reading for this chapter (from〔T08 0297b21〕 to before the next chapter) were not unfolded here (following the format of the preceding chapters); the fact that they were not unfolded is recorded as it is, left to later collation to check, and no estimate is used to fill the number.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing. The full statement of AI's role across the 指月 project is maintained at methodology.

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0