大智度論 大方便品Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · The Great Skilful Means

心要Essence

這一品的問法一開始就不尋常。須菩提不問方便是什麼,先問方便要多久才有:「是菩薩摩訶薩如是方便力成就者,發意已來幾時?」佛的答案是「是菩薩摩訶薩能成就方便力者,發心已來無量億阿僧祇劫。」再問供養過幾尊佛,答是如恒河沙;再問種了什麼善根,答是「菩薩成就如是方便力者,從初發意已來,於檀波羅蜜無不具足」,六度一個也不缺。三問三答,把『方便』從機巧那一邊整個挪開了——它不是臨場的手腕,是久到說不出數目的累積。須菩提聽完只說一句:「菩薩摩訶薩成就如是方便力者,甚希有!」論主接著解釋希有在哪裏:「無始生死已來集諸惡法,菩薩心後來,而能用後來心,不隨先所集惡心,是為希有!」惡是先來的,發心是後來的,後來的竟能勝過先來的——再加上「一切眾生無恩於菩薩,而菩薩常欲利益。」

佛接著一連舉了十個譬喻,說的都是同一件事:般若在五度裏是什麼位置。「譬如日月周行,照四天下,多有所益。般若波羅蜜亦如是,照五波羅蜜,多有所益。」轉輪聖王沒有輪寶就不叫轉輪聖王,「五波羅蜜亦如是,若離般若波羅蜜,不得波羅蜜名字」。又說「譬如無夫婦人,易為侵凌」,沒有般若的五度,魔要壞它容易得很。又說「譬如人之右手,所作事便,般若波羅蜜亦如是;如人左手,造事不便,五波羅蜜亦如是。」最後回到輪寶:四種兵行進,輪寶在前面領路,王要停輪就停,而輪自己並不離開它的位置——「般若波羅蜜亦如是,導五波羅蜜到薩婆若,常是中住,不過其處。」論主把軍將那個喻的配對挑明了說:「健將即是菩薩,器仗是般若。」而五度之所以要靠般若才叫波羅蜜,他給的理由只有半句:「菩薩雖行五波羅蜜,不得般若波羅蜜,不得名波羅蜜,以不破著心故。」差別不在多做了什麼,在著心破了沒有。

聽到「諸波羅蜜性無所能作、自性空」,須菩提立刻難:「世尊!若一切法自性空,云何菩薩摩訶薩行六波羅蜜當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?」佛不去辯那個空,反而就在空裏立方便:菩薩行六度時作是念——「是世間心皆顛倒,我若不行方便力,不能度脫眾生生死。」於是為眾生捨內外物,捨的時候還想著「我無所捨。何以故?是物必當壞敗。」為眾生終不破戒、不起一念瞋、不生懈怠、不生散亂、終不離智慧,一項一項都「能具足」。論主替這個不相礙處補了兩句最實在的話:「世人不可但為說諸法實相,聞則迷悶,生於疑悔。」所以「是故以第一義為心,用世俗語言為說」。心在第一義,話在世俗——空與說,並不互相取消。而五度也正是在這裏得名:「因般若波羅蜜,五波羅蜜得波羅蜜名字。」

那麼般若自己怎麼行?經上一路是遮:「般若波羅蜜無法可取、無法可捨。何以故?一切法不可取、不可捨故。」不取就是不念,「以念故著欲界、色界、無色界,不念故無所著。」不念就不住,「不著故不住。何以故?是菩薩不見有法可著、可住。」須菩提在這裏問得很實際:不念色,善根怎麼增長?佛的答覆是倒過來的——正因為不念,善根才增長。論主用一個種田的比方說明:「雖有善根,以取相著心顛倒故不增長;譬如種穀,其苗雖好,穢草多故,不能增長。」苗不是不好,是草太多。

這一品最要緊的一段,是失。第一種失,是行了生法二空而心裏說我能如是行,「若如是取相,則遠離般若波羅蜜」。第二種失,是破了空之後轉而執著般若無性。第三種最難察覺:菩薩想,諸佛是因為知諸法無受相才得無上道,我就照佛所知的去為人演說——這也失。經自己把底抽掉了:「佛於諸法無所知、無所得,亦無法可說,何況當有所得!無有是處!」論主替這三種收了一句:「菩薩著畢竟空、著無性、著菩薩所行道,佛說三種皆失。」而不失處也只有一句:「無所得故不貪貴佛、不輕賤餘人,於一切眾生其心平等。」貪貴佛和輕賤人,原來是同一個病的兩面。

卷八十二的末尾,佛以四法收一切法的略廣相。知如相——「色如相,無生、無滅、無住異,是名色如相」;知實際——「無際是名實際。」;知法性——「色性是名法性,是性無分、無非分。」;知不合不散——「是諸法自性無,云何有合有散?」四門說完,須菩提自己下了這一品的題:「是名菩薩摩訶薩略攝般若波羅蜜。」而學它的人有多廣,他也一併說了:「初發意菩薩摩訶薩應學,乃至十地菩薩摩訶薩亦應學。」論主解釋為什麼人人都該學,理由樸素得近乎一句家常:「略攝聞是安隱道故,一切菩薩所應學。」略攝不是把廣的省掉,是把廣的收在四個門裏。

卷八十三接上來,問的就是這個門。須菩提說:「世尊!是門,利根菩薩摩訶薩所入。」佛立刻把門推開:「鈍根菩薩亦可入是門,中根菩薩、散心菩薩亦可入是門;是門無礙,若菩薩摩訶薩一心學者皆入是門。」不能入的另有其人——「懈怠、少精進、妄憶念、亂心者所不能入,精進、不懈怠、正憶念、攝心者能入。」論主給了一個很好記的比方:「譬如熱時,清涼池,有目有足皆可入;雖近,不欲入者則不入。」門不擇人,只是不欲入的人自己不進去。他還把兩個人的話分得很清楚:須菩提是小乘智短,所以只說利根能入;佛是大乘大智,所以說中根、鈍根八法和合也能入。至於佛為什麼要這樣說,他的理由只有一句——「佛此中以大悲氣故說」中根、鈍根皆可得入。

之後是一長串『善知』:善知字門、非字門,善知言與不言,善知男語女語,善知陰界入、諦、十二因緣,善知五趣,善知四果與道,善知十一種慧……論主一目一目地訓,不肯含糊。而全品的結穴落在『方便』二字自己的定義上:「方便名欲成辦其事,能具足因緣多少得所,於中不令有失。」緊接著就是驗處:「如菩薩雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著。」行空而不取證,作福而不住著——這才是這一品所說的大方便。最後論主用商旅收尾:騎快馬的人明明能先到,卻停下來等同行的人;「菩薩亦如是,乘智慧駃馬,雖能疾入涅槃,亦待眾生故不入。」能入而不入,和行空而不證,說的原是同一件事。

The way of asking in this chapter is out of the ordinary from the start. Subhūti does not ask what skilful means is; he first asks how long it takes before there is skilful means: ‘This bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has thus accomplished the power of skilful means—how long is it since he aroused intent?’ The Buddha's answer is ‘This bodhisattva-mahāsattva who is able to accomplish the power of skilful means has, since arousing the mind, passed immeasurable koṭi of asaṃkhyeya kalpas.’ He asks further how many buddhas he has made offerings to, and the answer is as the sands of the Ganges; he asks further what roots of goodness he has planted, and the answer is ‘The bodhisattva who accomplishes such a power of skilful means has, from the first arousing of intent onward, in dānapāramitā nothing that is not fulfilled’, and of the six perfections not one is lacking. Three questions and three answers move ‘skilful means’ wholly away from the side of cleverness—it is not a trick of the hand on the spot; it is an accumulation so long that its number cannot be told. Having heard it, Subhūti says only one sentence: ‘The bodhisattva-mahāsattva who accomplishes such a power of skilful means is very rare!’ The treatise-author goes on to explain where the rarity lies: ‘From beginningless birth and death onward evil dharmas have been accumulated; the bodhisattva-mind comes afterwards, and yet he is able to use the mind that came afterwards and not follow the evil mind accumulated before; this is rare!’ Evil came first, the arousing of the mind came afterwards, and what came afterwards is actually able to overcome what came first—and to this is added ‘All beings have done the bodhisattva no kindness, and yet the bodhisattva constantly wishes to benefit them.’

The Buddha then brings up ten similes in a row, all speaking of the same matter: what place prajñā has among the five perfections. ‘It is as the sun and moon go round, illuminating the four continents and greatly benefiting them. Prajñāpāramitā is likewise: it illuminates the five perfections and greatly benefits them.’ A wheel-turning sage king without the wheel-jewel is not called a wheel-turning sage king; ‘the five perfections are likewise: if they are apart from prajñāpāramitā, they do not obtain the name of pāramitā’. Again he says ‘It is as a woman without a husband is easily encroached upon and abused’: the five perfections without prajñā, Māra can ruin with the greatest ease. Again he says ‘It is as a person's right hand, with which what is done is convenient—prajñāpāramitā is likewise; as a person's left hand, with which doing things is inconvenient—the five perfections are likewise.’ At the last he returns to the wheel-jewel: the four kinds of troops advance, the wheel-jewel leads the way in front, when the king wishes the wheel to stop it stops, and the wheel itself does not leave its place—‘Prajñāpāramitā is likewise: it guides the five perfections to sarvajñā, and constantly abides therein, not passing beyond its place.’ The treatise-author states the matching of the simile of the general outright: ‘The stalwart general is precisely the bodhisattva; the weapons are prajñā.’ And the reason he gives why the five perfections must rely on prajñā before they are called pāramitā is only half a sentence: ‘Though the bodhisattva practises the five perfections, if he does not obtain prajñāpāramitā they do not obtain the name of pāramitā, because the clinging mind is not broken.’ The difference lies not in what more has been done; it lies in whether the clinging mind has been broken or not.

Hearing that ‘the nature of the perfections has nothing it is able to do, and their self-nature is empty’, Subhūti at once raises the difficulty: ‘World-Honored One! If all dharmas are empty of self-nature, how will the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, practising the six perfections, obtain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi?’ The Buddha does not argue over that emptiness; instead, right within emptiness he sets up skilful means: when the bodhisattva practises the six perfections he has this thought—‘The minds of this world are all inverted; if I do not practise the power of skilful means, I cannot deliver beings from birth and death.’ Thereupon for the sake of beings he gives up inner and outer things, and as he gives them up he still thinks ‘I have given up nothing. Why? Because these things must certainly decay and be ruined.’ For the sake of beings he never breaks the precepts, does not give rise to a single thought of hatred, does not give rise to laziness, does not give rise to distraction, never departs from wisdom, and item by item he ‘is able to fulfil’ them. For this place where the two do not obstruct one another the treatise-author adds two sentences of the most solid kind: ‘To the people of the world one cannot speak only of the real mark of all dharmas; hearing it they are bewildered and give rise to doubt and regret.’ So ‘Therefore he takes the highest meaning as his mind, and uses worldly language to speak.’ The mind is in the highest meaning; the words are in the worldly—emptiness and speaking do not cancel one another. And it is exactly here that the five perfections obtain their name: ‘Because of prajñāpāramitā, the five perfections obtain the name of pāramitā.’

Then how is prajñā itself practised? In the sūtra it is negation all the way: ‘Prajñāpāramitā has no dharma that can be taken and no dharma that can be given up. Why? Because all dharmas cannot be taken and cannot be given up.’ Not taking is precisely not thinking, ‘because of thinking one clings to the desire realm, the form realm, and the formless realm; because of not thinking there is nothing one clings to.’ Not thinking, one then does not abide, ‘because of not clinging one does not abide. Why? This bodhisattva does not see that there is any dharma that can be clung to or that can be abided in.’ Here Subhūti asks very practically: if one does not think of form, how do roots of goodness increase? The Buddha's reply is turned the other way round—it is precisely because of not thinking that roots of goodness increase. The treatise-author explains with a comparison from tilling the fields: ‘Though there are roots of goodness, because of the inversion of the mind that grasps at marks and clings they do not increase; it is as when grain is planted: though its sprouts are good, because foul weeds are many they cannot increase.’ It is not that the sprouts are not good; it is that the weeds are too many.

The passage of this chapter that matters most is losing. The first kind of losing is to have practised the two emptinesses of beings and of dharmas and to say in one's mind ‘I am able to practise thus’; ‘if he grasps at marks in this way, he is far from prajñāpāramitā’. The second kind of losing is, after having broken emptiness, to turn and cling to prajñā's being without nature. The third kind is the hardest to notice: the bodhisattva thinks that the buddhas obtained the unsurpassed path because they knew that dharmas have no mark of receiving, and that he will expound to people according to what the Buddha knew—this too is losing. The sūtra itself draws the bottom out: ‘The Buddha, with regard to dharmas, has nothing he knows and nothing he attains, and has no dharma that can be spoken; how much less could there be something attained! There is no such case!’ For these three kinds the treatise-author gathers in one sentence: ‘The bodhisattva clings to ultimate emptiness, clings to being without nature, clings to the path the bodhisattva practises; the Buddha says that all three kinds are losing.’ And the place of not losing is likewise only one sentence: ‘Because of nothing to be attained, he does not covet and prize the Buddha and does not slight and despise other people; towards all beings his mind is equal.’ Coveting and prizing the Buddha and slighting and despising people are, it turns out, two faces of one and the same sickness.

At the end of fascicle eighty-two, the Buddha gathers in the brief and extensive marks of all dharmas by four dharmas. Knowing the mark of suchness—‘The mark of suchness of form is without arising, without ceasing, without abiding-and-changing; this is named the mark of suchness of form’; knowing the limit of reality—‘Being without limit is named the limit of reality.’; knowing the nature of dharmas—‘The nature of form is named the nature of dharmas; this nature is without parts and without non-parts.’; knowing neither joined nor dispersed—‘These dharmas are without self-nature; how could there be joining and dispersing?’ The four gates having been spoken, Subhūti himself sets down the heading of this chapter: ‘This is named the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's brief gathering of prajñāpāramitā.’ And how wide is the range of those who train in it he says along with it: ‘The bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has first aroused intent should train in it, and so on up to the bodhisattva-mahāsattva of the ten grounds should also train in it.’ The treatise-author explains why everyone should train in it, and the reason is so plain as to be nearly a household saying: ‘Because the brief gathering, when heard, is the path of peace and security, it is what all bodhisattvas should train in.’ The brief gathering is not leaving out what is extensive; it is gathering what is extensive into four gates.

Fascicle eighty-three takes it up, and what is asked is this very gate. Subhūti says: ‘World-Honored One! This gate is what the bodhisattva-mahāsattva of keen faculties enters.’ The Buddha at once pushes the gate open: ‘The bodhisattva of dull faculties can also enter this gate; the bodhisattva of middling faculties and the bodhisattva of scattered mind can also enter this gate; this gate is without obstruction; if a bodhisattva-mahāsattva trains with a single mind, all enter this gate.’ Those who cannot enter are other people—‘What the lazy, those of little vigour, those of false recollection, and those of disordered mind cannot enter, the vigorous, the not lazy, those of right recollection, and those of collected mind can enter.’ The treatise-author gives a comparison that is very easy to remember: ‘It is as, in the time of heat, a clear and cool pool: all who have eyes and have feet can enter; though it is near, one who does not wish to enter does not enter.’ The gate does not choose people; it is only that the person who does not wish to enter does not go in of himself. He also divides the words of the two persons very clearly: Subhūti is of the Small Vehicle, his knowledge short, and so he says only that keen faculties can enter; the Buddha is of the Great Vehicle, of great knowledge, and so he says that those of middling faculties and dull faculties, with the eight dharmas coming together, can also enter. As to why the Buddha speaks in this way, his reason is only one sentence—‘The Buddha here speaks because of the breath of great compassion’ that those of middling faculties and dull faculties can all obtain entry.

After this there is a long string of ‘knows well’: knows well the gates of letters and what are not gates of letters, knows well speech and non-speech, knows well the speech of men and the speech of women, knows well the aggregates, elements, and sense-fields, the truths, and the twelve links of causes and conditions, knows well the five destinies, knows well the four fruits and the path, knows well the eleven wisdoms … The treatise-author glosses them heading by heading and will not be vague. And the whole chapter comes to rest upon the definition of the two Chinese characters rendered here as ‘skilful means’ themselves: ‘Skilful means names wishing to accomplish a matter, being able to make the causes and conditions complete, in the right measure of more and less, and within it not letting there be any loss.’ Right after it comes the place of proof: ‘As the bodhisattva, though he practises emptiness, does not realise the limit of reality; though he practises merit, he also does not cling.’ Practising emptiness without taking realisation, making merit without abiding and clinging—only this is the great skilful means of which this chapter speaks. At the last the treatise-author closes with the travelling merchants: the person riding a swift horse could plainly arrive first, yet he stops and waits for those who travel with him; ‘the bodhisattva is likewise: riding the swift horse of wisdom, though he could quickly enter nirvāṇa, he too, because he waits for beings, does not enter.’ Being able to enter and not entering, and practising emptiness and not realising it, speak of what was from the first the same matter.

義疏 · 總說Exposition · Overview

總說

〈大方便品〉之題,眼目在一個「方便」,而全品所答的其實只是一個問題:既然諸法自性空,行六波羅蜜這件事還能不能成立。前品說菩薩住一波羅蜜中而取其餘五波羅蜜,本品論①開卷即接住那一句——「須菩提聞菩薩摩訶薩大利根相,所謂一波羅蜜邊能生五波羅蜜,行一波羅蜜即能具五波羅蜜,如上品中說;是事希有」——於是須菩提先問這樣的人來歷有多深:「是菩薩摩訶薩如是方便力成就者,發意已來幾時?」佛答「無量億阿僧祇劫」,又答「供養如恒河沙等諸佛」,又答其所種善根是「從初發意已來,於檀波羅蜜無不具足」。問來歷,其實是問方便力從何而來。品名之所以標「大」,也正在此:方便不是臨事的機巧,是無量劫六度具足之後,於畢竟空中仍能起行的那一分力。全品二經二論,跨卷八十二、八十三:之上一分是經①,以番番譬喻說般若導五度,再一路問到諸波羅蜜之無差別與諸種著失,終以如、法性、實際、不合不散四門收為「略攝般若波羅蜜」;之中一分是論①,逐句釋上一分之經,凡經中之譬皆給其所喻,凡經中之難皆給其所以;之下一分是卷八十三之「之餘」,經②答「是門」不簡根器,並列行般若者所得之利益,論②釋其四門何以人人可入,並逐一釋那一長串「善知」。

之上一分,說般若之導與行者之失。經①開卷三問,問方便力成就者之時節、供養、善根,而後佛以一連串譬喻讚般若:般若照五波羅蜜,「譬如日月周行,照四天下,多有所益」;五波羅蜜離般若則失其名,「譬如轉輪聖王,若無輪寶,不得名為轉輪聖王」;離般若則易壞,「譬如無夫婦人,易為侵凌」;不離般若則不可壞,「譬如軍將,鎧仗具足,隣國強敵所不能壞」;五度隨般若,「譬如諸小國王,隨時朝侍轉輪聖王」;同歸薩婆若,「譬如眾川萬流,皆入於恒河,隨入大海」;用之便與不便,「譬如人之右手,所作事便,般若波羅蜜亦如是;如人左手,造事不便,五波羅蜜亦如是」;入海同味,「譬如眾流,若大、若小俱入大海,合為一味」;而最要者是輪寶在前之喻——般若「導五波羅蜜到薩婆若,常是中住,不過其處」,且導而無心,般若不分別「檀波羅蜜隨從我」,檀波羅蜜亦不分別「我隨從般若波羅蜜」,其所以者只一句:「諸波羅蜜性無所能作、自性空、虛誑、如野馬。」譬喻既畢,須菩提即以此為難:「若一切法自性空,云何菩薩摩訶薩行六波羅蜜當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?」佛之答,正是本品品名之所出——菩薩作是念「是世間心皆顛倒,我若不行方便力,不能度脫眾生生死」,於是為眾生故行六度:捨時念「我無所捨」而具足檀,終不破戒而具足尸羅,不生一念瞋而具足羼提,不生懈怠而具足毘梨耶,不生散亂而具足禪,終不離智慧而具足般若——「除智慧,不可以餘法度脫眾生故。」其下三番再問般若何以獨最上,佛答只在世俗與第一義之間:實義中雖無分別,「但以世俗法故說」六波羅蜜;而般若之所以最上,在「取一切善法到薩婆若中,住不住故」。由此轉入取捨與念住:般若「無法可取、無法可捨」,於色乃至菩提「不取不捨」,而所謂不取即是「不念」;不念何以反能增善根,佛答「以念故著欲界、色界、無色界,不念故無所著」。行者最易失處亦在此處逐一點破:若作念「我今行般若波羅蜜、修般若波羅蜜」而取相,「則遠離般若波羅蜜」;若作念「住是般若波羅蜜,能生檀波羅蜜,乃至能生大悲」,「則為失般若波羅蜜」;若作念「諸佛知諸法無受相故,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」而演說教詔,亦「則失般若波羅蜜」;乃至答其如何無過之後,猶補一句「若菩薩摩訶薩著無所有法,則遠離般若波羅蜜」。相列至此,經文轉問道與非道:「聲聞道非菩薩道,辟支佛道非菩薩道;一切種智道是菩薩摩訶薩道。」須菩提遂讚般若「為大事故起」。末後一大節,由行入知:菩薩應學六波羅蜜若略若廣,而知略廣相之門有四——知色乃至一切種智之「如相,無生、無滅、無住異」,知實際而「無際是名實際」,知法性而「色性是名法性,是性無分、無非分」,知一切法「不合不散」;四門既列,須菩提即收之曰「是名菩薩摩訶薩略攝般若波羅蜜」,並言此中「初發意菩薩摩訶薩應學,乃至十地菩薩摩訶薩亦應學」。

之中一分,逐句釋上分之經,凡譬必給其所喻,凡難必給其所以。論①先釋三問之次第:問發心久近者,因「是事希有」;問供養者,因「或有菩薩發心已來無量億阿僧祇劫,大罪因緣覆心故不見佛,不親近供養」;問善根者,因久發心而多以華香供養,未必已種善根——「若以深心行六波羅蜜,為阿耨多羅三藐三菩提故作功德,是名『種善根』。」而所謂希有,論主說得極質實:「未斷諸煩惱、未離生死,而能勝斷煩惱、離生死法者」,且「一切眾生無恩於菩薩,而菩薩常欲利益」。日月之喻,論主分兩義:一義取其成長萬物——「月是陰氣,日是陽氣,二氣和合故萬物成長」,喻菩薩之大悲與大智;一義取其能見——「眾生雖復有眼,若無日月,則無所見」,喻「眾生雖有世俗善根利智,不得般若波羅蜜照明,尚不得二乘」。輪寶之喻,取其名之所繫:轉輪聖王雖有千子六寶,「不得名為轉輪聖王」;菩薩雖有布施等善法,不得般若,「但名為行善法,有量有盡故」。眾流入海一喻另起一問:五度如川、般若如海,何以經言入薩婆若而不言入般若?論主答得直截:「薩婆若即是般若異名」,五度之福入般若中即得清淨般若,「般若清淨故,得佛道,變名薩婆若」。輪寶在前導一喻,論主把『無心而導』四字補足:輪「無所分別:『我常在前,餘寶在後;無憎愛心:是可來、是不可來。』」,般若之不分別亦如是。而全論最要之一節,是釋「方便」二字之實指——論牒經中菩薩之念既是「我若不以方便力,則不可得度」,則方便者何?論主逐項舉之:「所謂金色身、三十二相,八十隨形好,無量光明,神通變化」,乃至「十力、四無所畏、十八不共法、無礙解脫、一切種智、大慈大悲等」;具此無量佛法然後能教化,眾生乃能信受,其效驗一句說盡:「得如是力,假令妄語,人猶當信,何況實語!」無差別而般若獨大,論主亦以喻答:「如諸異色物,到須彌山邊,皆同一色」,故不得難其獨稱為大;又曰「雖諸善法和合能破煩惱、得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,而般若波羅蜜於中功力最大。譬如大軍摧敵,而主將得功名。」不念何以增善根,喻在種穀——「雖有善根,以取相著心顛倒故不增長;譬如種穀,其苗雖好,穢草多故,不能增長。」諸失之釋尤須細讀:作念我能如是行者,「以我心外著空、內著我,不如般若行,故言遠離般若」;破空而轉著般若者,「上以著空故失,今以破空得般若,而著般若無性故失」;不著空、不著無性而自以為得真道者,「是亦為失,以其心有悕望故」;自居凡夫而但隨佛語為人開示者,「是不取相法,乃至假名字不可說,何況有所得」。論主自結其要曰「菩薩著畢竟空、著無性、著菩薩所行道,佛說三種皆失」;而猶有一重更細者——菩薩捨著心已,「今猶著佛所行未息」,而佛心中所得之法,「佛亦無所得;無所得故不貪貴佛、不輕賤餘人,於一切眾生其心平等」。末釋四門,「不合不散」一節論主以指為喻反覆破析:「三節皮肉具足為指,指無定法」;「設有指法,亦不盡合,一分合,多分不合」;「指與分不異不一故,即是無指;無指故無合」。所破者不是眼所見之合,是心所執之定法。

之下一分,卷首帶「之餘」續題,由略攝之四門轉入誰能入、入者得何。經②起處,須菩提說「是門,利根菩薩摩訶薩所入」,而佛不許此判:「鈍根菩薩亦可入是門,中根菩薩、散心菩薩亦可入是門」,所簡者不在根之利鈍,只在心之懈怠與否——「懈怠、少精進、妄憶念、亂心者所不能入,精進、不懈怠、正憶念、攝心者能入。」行此門者,「所有魔事欲起即滅」,且為十方現在諸佛所念,其所以者是「般若波羅蜜中生過去、未來、現在諸佛故」。其下以福德校量顯其勢:行般若「乃至彈指頃」,其福已勝教三千大千世界眾生盡行施戒禪慧乃至得二乘果;行之若須臾、若一日、若百劫,其福更勝教十方恒河沙等世界之眾生。而如般若所說住者,即是阿鞞跋致,「如是方便力成就」,乃至「住法王子地,滿足諸願,常不離諸佛」。末後一長節,經文逐項列其「善知」:自「善知字門、善知非字門」起,歷言語男女之語、色乃至識、世間性與涅槃性、有為無為、自性他性、合散、相應不相應、如與不如、法性法位、陰界入、諦與十二因緣、禪與無量心無色定、六波羅蜜與四念處乃至一切種智、諸觀、諸空、捨道與不捨道、生滅住異、欲瞋癡與不欲不瞋不癡、見與不見、名色、四緣、四諦、五道與五趣、四果四向與辟支佛佛、諸根、乃至十一種慧,以至三世、方便、待眾生、心與深心、義與語,終於「善知分別三乘」。而佛以一句收此長列:「菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜、生般若波羅蜜、修般若波羅蜜,得如是等利益。」論②所釋,首在為佛之不簡根器作解:須菩提之意是四門「以甚深故,利根者乃得入」,而佛意「但一心精進欲學者可入」;其喻最平易——「譬如熱時,清涼池,有目有足皆可入;雖近,不欲入者則不入。」既非池有所拒,則所簡者唯在欲入不欲入。論主更把經中四句配成聖道:「不懈怠者是正精進,不妄念者是正念,不亂心者是正定,如等四門是正見,正見等安住是戒行——此八聖道能得般若波羅蜜。」而須菩提何以判為利根獨入?「須菩提小乘智短故」;佛何以說中鈍皆入?「佛此中以大悲氣故說『中根、鈍根皆可得入』。」其次釋學般若與學五度之關係,先設自難——「上說『但般若能至一切種智』,今何以言『與五波羅蜜合故得至』?」答曰常途是六度合行乃得,惟「或時有清淨佛國,但聞實相得至薩婆若,不用次第行諸波羅蜜」。末後逐條釋「善知」,其中最可帶走者數則:「非字名如、法性、實際,此中無文字」;善知捨道者是「從一地至一地,捨下地不憂,得上地不貪」;十一種慧逐一給其義,疾慧是「速知諸法」,出慧是「於種種難中能自拔出」,達慧是「究盡通達」,深慧是「觀一切法無量、無相、不可思議」,無等慧是「於般若中不著般若」,寶慧則喻如如意寶——「自無定色,隨前物而變;般若亦如是,自無定相,隨諸法行」;而「方便」二字之界說,論主至此方下得最緊:「方便名欲成辦其事,能具足因緣多少得所,於中不令有失。如菩薩雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著。」待眾生者亦有喻:「如估客、大將雖乘駃馬能疾到所止,故待眾人;菩薩亦如是,乘智慧駃馬,雖能疾入涅槃,亦待眾生故不入。」

三分之別,一言可斷:之上說般若之導與行者之失,之中說其所以然,之下說其門之無礙與入者之所得。之上所列多是可讚之相——番番譬喻,番番說般若之勝;之中所給多是可問之理——凡一譬必還其所喻,凡一難必還其所以;之下所答則是可行之路——不簡根器,只簡懈怠。而三分之間有一線貫串,即「方便」二字。經①之方便,是「我若不行方便力,不能度脫眾生生死」,故方便是為眾生而起行;論①之方便,是三十二相八十隨形好乃至十力四無所畏,故方便是行之所成;論②之方便,是「雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著」,故方便是行與空之間不落兩邊的那一分斟酌。三處合看,方便之義乃全:由悲而起,由行而成,由不著而不失。品名之所以標「大」,亦正為此——不是善巧之大小,是所被之廣、所歷之久、所不著之徹。

因此,讀此品之每一段時,至少可問三層。其一,這一句是說般若之德,還是說我之病。經①前半番番讚般若,讀之極順;而一入「若菩薩摩訶薩作是念」以下,句句是病——所病者不是不行,是行而作念;不是不得,是得而取相。故凡讀到一個好相現前,先問此相是被說出來讚的,還是被說出來認的。其二,這一句所破的是事,還是執。論主破二指之合,不是說指不能合,是說「指無定法」;破著空,不是說空不可行,是說「般若波羅蜜是不著相」。凡見論主用力破處,所破多在一個『定』字:定有一法可取,定有一處可住,定有一人能行。其三,我今鈍根散心,此品於我何用。之下一分正為此設:佛不許『利根乃入』之判,而以清涼池為喻——池不擇人,只擇有目有足而肯入者;所以八聖道之四句,句句是我今日可下手處。順著二經二論讀下去,終會落在論主釋方便那一句上:「方便名欲成辦其事,能具足因緣多少得所,於中不令有失。」所謂大方便,不外是把一件必須成辦的事,在畢竟空中一分不失地辦成。

依原論次序讀下去

Overview

In the title of "The Great Skilful Means" the eye lies in a single 「方便」 tr. "skilful means", and what the whole chapter answers is in fact only one question: since all dharmas are empty of self-nature, can the matter of practising the six perfections still be established or not? The preceding chapter said that the bodhisattva abides in one perfection and takes up the other five perfections; Treatise ① of this chapter, as it opens, at once takes up that sentence—「須菩提聞菩薩摩訶薩大利根相,所謂一波羅蜜邊能生五波羅蜜,行一波羅蜜即能具五波羅蜜,如上品中說;是事希有」 tr. "Subhūti heard of the mark of the great keen faculties of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva—namely, that from the side of one perfection he can give rise to the five perfections, and that by practising one perfection he can fulfil the five perfections, as was said in the previous chapter; this matter is rare"—and thereupon Subhūti first asks how deep such a person's origins go: 「是菩薩摩訶薩如是方便力成就者,發意已來幾時?」 tr. "This bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has thus accomplished the power of skilful means—how long is it since he aroused intent?" The Buddha answers 「無量億阿僧祇劫」 tr. "immeasurable koṭi of asaṃkhyeya kalpas", answers further 「供養如恒河沙等諸佛」 tr. "he has made offerings to buddhas as many as the sands of the Ganges", and answers further that the roots of goodness he has planted are 「從初發意已來,於檀波羅蜜無不具足」 tr. "from the first arousing of intent onward, in dānapāramitā nothing that is not fulfilled". To ask about origins is in fact to ask where the power of skilful means comes from. The reason the chapter's name bears 「大」 tr. "great" lies precisely here: skilful means is not a cleverness for the matter at hand; it is that portion of power which, after the six perfections have been fulfilled through immeasurable kalpas, is still able to set out to practise within ultimate emptiness. The whole chapter, two sūtras and two treatises, spans fascicles eighty-two and eighty-three: the First Part is Sūtra ①, which speaks, simile after simile, of prajñā guiding the five perfections, then asks all the way on to the perfections' being without difference and the several kinds of clinging and losing, and closes by gathering the four gates of suchness, the nature of dharmas, the limit of reality, and neither joined nor dispersed into 「略攝般若波羅蜜」 tr. "the brief gathering of prajñāpāramitā"; the Middle Part is Treatise ①, which explains the sūtra of the part above sentence by sentence: for every simile in the sūtra it gives what is likened, for every difficulty in the sūtra it gives the reason; the Last Part is the 「之餘」 tr. "continued" of fascicle eighty-three, where Sūtra ② answers that 「是門」 tr. "this gate" does not sift by capacity and lists the benefits obtained by those who practise prajñā, and Treatise ② explains why its four gates can be entered by everyone, and explains one by one that long string of 「善知」 tr. "knows well".

The First Part speaks of the guiding of prajñā and of the practitioner's losing. Sūtra ① opens with three questions, asking about the time, the offerings, and the roots of goodness of one who has accomplished the power of skilful means, and then the Buddha praises prajñā with a whole string of similes: prajñā illuminates the five perfections—「譬如日月周行,照四天下,多有所益」 tr. "It is as the sun and moon go round, illuminating the four continents and greatly benefiting them"; the five perfections apart from prajñā lose their name—「譬如轉輪聖王,若無輪寶,不得名為轉輪聖王」 tr. "It is as with a wheel-turning sage king: if he has no wheel-jewel, he does not obtain the name of wheel-turning sage king"; apart from prajñā they are easily ruined—「譬如無夫婦人,易為侵凌」 tr. "It is as a woman without a husband is easily encroached upon and abused"; not apart from prajñā they cannot be ruined—「譬如軍將,鎧仗具足,隣國強敵所不能壞」 tr. "It is as a general in an army, fully equipped with armour and weapons, cannot be ruined by the powerful enemies of neighbouring countries"; the five perfections follow prajñā—「譬如諸小國王,隨時朝侍轉輪聖王」 tr. "It is as the lesser kings, at the proper times, pay court to and serve the wheel-turning sage king"; together they return to sarvajñā—「譬如眾川萬流,皆入於恒河,隨入大海」 tr. "It is as the many rivers and myriad streams all flow into the Ganges, and following it flow into the great sea"; in use, convenient and inconvenient—「譬如人之右手,所作事便,般若波羅蜜亦如是;如人左手,造事不便,五波羅蜜亦如是」 tr. "It is as a person's right hand, with which doing things is convenient—prajñāpāramitā is likewise; as a person's left hand, with which doing and making things is inconvenient—the five perfections are likewise"; entering the sea, one taste—「譬如眾流,若大、若小俱入大海,合為一味」 tr. "It is as the many streams, whether great or small, all flow together into the great sea and become a single taste"; and the most important is the simile of the wheel-jewel in front—prajñā 「導五波羅蜜到薩婆若,常是中住,不過其處」 tr. "guides the five perfections to reach sarvajñā, and constantly abides therein, not passing beyond its place", and it guides without a mind: prajñā does not discriminate 「檀波羅蜜隨從我」 tr. "Dānapāramitā follows me", and dānapāramitā likewise does not discriminate 「我隨從般若波羅蜜」 tr. "I follow prajñāpāramitā", and the reason for it is only one sentence: 「諸波羅蜜性無所能作、自性空、虛誑、如野馬。」 tr. "The nature of the perfections has nothing it is able to do; their self-nature is empty, is false and deceptive, like a mirage." The similes finished, Subhūti at once makes this a difficulty: 「若一切法自性空,云何菩薩摩訶薩行六波羅蜜當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?」 tr. "If all dharmas are empty of self-nature, how is it that the bodhisattva-mahāsattva practises the six perfections and is to obtain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi?" The Buddha's answer is exactly where the name of this chapter comes from—the bodhisattva has this thought, 「是世間心皆顛倒,我若不行方便力,不能度脫眾生生死」 tr. "The minds of this world are all inverted; if I do not practise the power of skilful means, I cannot deliver beings from birth and death", and thereupon for the sake of beings he practises the six perfections: when giving up he thinks 「我無所捨」 tr. "I give up nothing" and fulfils giving; he never breaks the precepts and fulfils morality; he does not give rise to a single thought of hatred and fulfils patience; he does not give rise to laziness and fulfils vigour; he does not give rise to distraction and fulfils meditation; he never departs from wisdom and fulfils prajñā—「除智慧,不可以餘法度脫眾生故。」 tr. "Because apart from wisdom, one cannot deliver beings by any other dharma." Below this, three rounds ask again why prajñā alone is highest, and the Buddha's answer lies only between the worldly and the highest meaning: though within the real meaning there is no discrimination, 「但以世俗法故說」 tr. "yet by reason of worldly dharmas one speaks of" the six perfections; and why prajñā is highest lies in this, that it 「取一切善法到薩婆若中,住不住故」 tr. "takes all wholesome dharmas into sarvajñā, and this is because it takes abiding as not abiding". From here it turns to taking and giving up, and to thinking and abiding: prajñā 「無法可取、無法可捨」 tr. "has no dharma that can be taken and no dharma that can be given up", towards form and so on up to awakening it is 「不取不捨」 tr. "not taking and not giving up", and what is called not taking is precisely 「不念」 tr. "not thinking"; as to why not thinking is instead able to increase roots of goodness, the Buddha answers: 「以念故著欲界、色界、無色界,不念故無所著」 tr. "Because of thinking one clings to the desire realm, the form realm, and the formless realm; because of not thinking there is nothing one clings to." The places where the practitioner most easily loses are likewise pointed out here one by one: if he has the thought 「我今行般若波羅蜜、修般若波羅蜜」 tr. "I now practise prajñāpāramitā and cultivate prajñāpāramitā" and grasps at marks, 「則遠離般若波羅蜜」 tr. "he is far from prajñāpāramitā"; if he has the thought 「住是般若波羅蜜,能生檀波羅蜜,乃至能生大悲」 tr. "abiding in this prajñāpāramitā, one can give rise to dānapāramitā, and so on up to can give rise to great compassion", 「則為失般若波羅蜜」 tr. "he loses prajñāpāramitā"; if he has the thought 「諸佛知諸法無受相故,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "the buddhas, because they knew that dharmas have no mark of receiving, obtained anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi" and expounds and instructs, then too 「則失般若波羅蜜」 tr. "he loses prajñāpāramitā"; and so on up to this: after answering how one is without fault, it still adds one sentence, 「若菩薩摩訶薩著無所有法,則遠離般若波羅蜜」 tr. "if the bodhisattva-mahāsattva clings to the dharma of being without anything existent, he is far from prajñāpāramitā". The marks having been listed thus far, the sūtra turns to ask about the path and what is not the path: 「聲聞道非菩薩道,辟支佛道非菩薩道;一切種智道是菩薩摩訶薩道。」 tr. "The śrāvaka path is not the bodhisattva path; the pratyekabuddha path is not the bodhisattva path; the path of the omniscience of all kinds is the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's path." Subhūti thereupon praises prajñā as 「為大事故起」 tr. "arising for the sake of a great matter". The last great section passes from practice into knowing: the bodhisattva should train in the six perfections whether brief or extensive, and the gates for knowing the brief and extensive marks are four—to know, of form and so on up to the omniscience of all kinds, the 「如相,無生、無滅、無住異」 tr. "mark of suchness: without arising, without ceasing, without abiding-and-changing"; to know the limit of reality, that 「無際是名實際」 tr. "being without limit is called the limit of reality"; to know the nature of dharmas, that 「色性是名法性,是性無分、無非分」 tr. "the nature of form is called the nature of dharmas; this nature is without parts and without non-parts"; to know all dharmas as 「不合不散」 tr. "neither joined nor dispersed". The four gates having been listed, Subhūti at once gathers them in, saying 「是名菩薩摩訶薩略攝般若波羅蜜」 tr. "this is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's brief gathering of prajñāpāramitā", and says that within it 「初發意菩薩摩訶薩應學,乃至十地菩薩摩訶薩亦應學」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has first aroused intent should train, and so on up to the bodhisattva-mahāsattva of the ten grounds should also train".

The Middle Part explains the sūtra of the part above sentence by sentence: for every simile it gives what is likened, for every difficulty it gives the reason. Treatise ① first explains the order of the three questions: asking how long ago he aroused the mind is because 「是事希有」 tr. "this matter is rare"; asking about offerings is because 「或有菩薩發心已來無量億阿僧祇劫,大罪因緣覆心故不見佛,不親近供養」 tr. "perhaps there is a bodhisattva who, since arousing the mind, has passed immeasurable koṭi of asaṃkhyeya kalpas, yet because the causes and conditions of great sin have covered his mind, he does not see the Buddha, and does not draw near and make offerings"; asking about roots of goodness is because one who aroused the mind long ago and has made many offerings of flowers and incense has not necessarily already planted roots of goodness—「若以深心行六波羅蜜,為阿耨多羅三藐三菩提故作功德,是名『種善根』。」 tr. "If one practises the six perfections with a deep mind and makes merit for the sake of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, this is called ‘planting roots of goodness’." And what is called rare the treatise-author states most plainly: 「未斷諸煩惱、未離生死,而能勝斷煩惱、離生死法者」 tr. "one who has not yet cut off the afflictions and has not yet left birth and death, yet is able to surpass the dharma of those who have cut off the afflictions and left birth and death", and 「一切眾生無恩於菩薩,而菩薩常欲利益」 tr. "all beings have done the bodhisattva no kindness, and yet the bodhisattva constantly wishes to benefit them". The simile of the sun and moon the treatise-author divides into two meanings: one meaning takes their making the myriad things grow—「月是陰氣,日是陽氣,二氣和合故萬物成長」 tr. "the moon is the yin breath and the sun is the yang breath; because the two breaths come together, the myriad things grow"—likening the bodhisattva's great compassion and great wisdom; the other meaning takes their enabling sight—「眾生雖復有眼,若無日月,則無所見」 tr. "though beings have eyes, if there were no sun and moon they would see nothing"—likening 「眾生雖有世俗善根利智,不得般若波羅蜜照明,尚不得二乘」 tr. "though beings have worldly roots of goodness and keen knowledge, if they do not obtain the illumination of prajñāpāramitā, they cannot obtain even the two vehicles". The simile of the wheel-jewel takes up what the name hangs on: though the wheel-turning sage king has a thousand sons and six jewels, he 「不得名為轉輪聖王」 tr. "does not obtain the name of wheel-turning sage king"; though the bodhisattva has giving and the other wholesome dharmas, if he does not obtain prajñā, he is 「但名為行善法,有量有盡故」 tr. "only called one who practises wholesome dharmas, because they are measured and have an end". The simile of the streams entering the sea raises a separate question: the five perfections are like the rivers and prajñā like the sea, so why does the sūtra say that they enter sarvajñā, and not that they enter prajñā? The treatise-author answers directly: 「薩婆若即是般若異名」 tr. "sarvajñā is another name for prajñā"; the merit of the five perfections, entering into prajñā, obtains pure prajñā, and 「般若清淨故,得佛道,變名薩婆若」 tr. "because prajñā is pure, one obtains the Buddha path, and its name is changed to sarvajñā". In the simile of the wheel-jewel leading in front, the treatise-author fills out the four Chinese characters rendered here as ‘guiding without a mind’: the wheel 「無所分別:『我常在前,餘寶在後;無憎愛心:是可來、是不可來。』」 tr. "makes no discrimination: ‘I am always in front and the other jewels behind; there is no mind of hatred or love: this one may come, that one may not come.’", and the non-discrimination of prajñā is likewise. And the most important passage of the whole treatise section is its explanation of what the two Chinese characters 「方便」 tr. "skilful means" actually refer to—since the bodhisattva's thought in the sūtra, as the treatise restates it, is 「我若不以方便力,則不可得度」 tr. "if I do not use the power of skilful means, they cannot be delivered", then what is skilful means? The treatise-author lists it item by item: 「所謂金色身、三十二相,八十隨形好,無量光明,神通變化」 tr. "namely, the golden-coloured body, the thirty-two marks, the eighty minor marks, immeasurable light, supernormal powers and transformations", and so on up to 「十力、四無所畏、十八不共法、無礙解脫、一切種智、大慈大悲等」 tr. "the ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the eighteen unshared dharmas, unobstructed liberation, the omniscience of all kinds, great kindness and great compassion, and so on"; having fulfilled these immeasurable dharmas of the Buddha, he is then able to teach and transform, and beings are then able to believe and accept; and its effect is said to the full in one sentence: 「得如是力,假令妄語,人猶當信,何況實語!」 tr. "Having obtained such power, even if he were to speak falsely people would still believe him, how much more when he speaks the truth!" That they are without difference and yet prajñā alone is great, the treatise-author likewise answers with a simile: 「如諸異色物,到須彌山邊,皆同一色」 tr. "as things of various different colours, on reaching the side of Mount Sumeru, all become one colour alike", and so one cannot raise the difficulty of its alone being called great; he also says: 「雖諸善法和合能破煩惱、得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,而般若波羅蜜於中功力最大。譬如大軍摧敵,而主將得功名。」 tr. "Though the wholesome dharmas, coming together, can break the afflictions and obtain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, yet among them the power and function of prajñāpāramitā are the greatest. It is as when a great army crushes the enemy, and the general obtains the fame of the achievement." As to why not thinking increases roots of goodness, the simile lies in planting grain—「雖有善根,以取相著心顛倒故不增長;譬如種穀,其苗雖好,穢草多故,不能增長。」 tr. "Though there are roots of goodness, because of the inversion of the mind that grasps at marks and clings, they do not increase; it is as when grain is planted: though its sprouts are good, because foul weeds are many they cannot increase." The explanation of the several losings must be read with special care: of one who has the thought that he is able to practise thus, 「以我心外著空、內著我,不如般若行,故言遠離般若」 tr. "with the mind of a self he clings outwardly to emptiness and inwardly to a self, and does not practise in accord with prajñā, so it is said that he is far from prajñā"; of one who breaks emptiness and turns to cling to prajñā, 「上以著空故失,今以破空得般若,而著般若無性故失」 tr. "above, one lost by clinging to emptiness; now, having broken emptiness and obtained prajñā, one yet loses by clinging to prajñā's being without nature"; of one who does not cling to emptiness and does not cling to being without nature, and considers himself to have obtained the true path, 「是亦為失,以其心有悕望故」 tr. "this too is losing, because in his mind there are hopes"; of one who places himself among ordinary persons and only follows the Buddha's words in disclosing to others, 「是不取相法,乃至假名字不可說,何況有所得」 tr. "this dharma of not grasping at marks cannot be spoken of even as a provisional name, how much less could there be something attained". The treatise-author himself sums up its essentials: 「菩薩著畢竟空、著無性、著菩薩所行道,佛說三種皆失」 tr. "The bodhisattva clings to ultimate emptiness, clings to being without nature, clings to the path the bodhisattva practises; the Buddha says that all three kinds are losing"; and there is still one layer subtler yet—the bodhisattva, having given up the clinging mind, 「今猶著佛所行未息」 tr. "now still clings to what the Buddha practises and has not stopped", while as to the dharma the Buddha obtained in his mind, 「佛亦無所得;無所得故不貪貴佛、不輕賤餘人,於一切眾生其心平等」 tr. "the Buddha too has nothing to be attained; because of nothing to be attained, he does not covet and prize the Buddha and does not slight and despise other people; towards all beings his mind is equal". Last, explaining the four gates, in the section on 「不合不散」 tr. "neither joined nor dispersed" the treatise-author takes the finger as a simile and analyses it again and again: 「三節皮肉具足為指,指無定法」 tr. "only when three joints, skin, and flesh are complete is there a finger; a finger has no fixed dharma"; 「設有指法,亦不盡合,一分合,多分不合」 tr. "even supposing there is the dharma of a finger, it is not wholly joined: one part is joined and the greater part is not joined"; 「指與分不異不一故,即是無指;無指故無合」 tr. "because the finger and its parts are neither different nor one, there is no finger; because there is no finger there is no joining". What is broken is not the joining the eye sees; it is the fixed dharma the mind grasps.

The Last Part carries the continuation title 「之餘」 tr. "continued" at the head of the fascicle, and turns from the four gates of the brief gathering to who can enter and what those who enter obtain. Where Sūtra ② begins, Subhūti says 「是門,利根菩薩摩訶薩所入」 tr. "this gate is what the bodhisattva-mahāsattva of keen faculties enters", and the Buddha does not allow this judgement: 「鈍根菩薩亦可入是門,中根菩薩、散心菩薩亦可入是門」 tr. "the bodhisattva of dull faculties can also enter this gate; the bodhisattva of middling faculties and the bodhisattva of scattered mind can also enter this gate"; what sifts lies not in the keenness or dullness of the faculties, only in whether or not the mind is lazy—「懈怠、少精進、妄憶念、亂心者所不能入,精進、不懈怠、正憶念、攝心者能入。」 tr. "The lazy, those of little vigour, those of false recollection, and those of disordered mind are those who cannot enter; the vigorous, the not lazy, those of right recollection, and those of collected mind can enter." For one who practises this gate, 「所有魔事欲起即滅」 tr. "whatever deeds of Māra there are cease the moment they would arise", and he is kept in mind by the buddhas now present in the ten directions; the reason is 「般若波羅蜜中生過去、未來、現在諸佛故」 tr. "because from within prajñāpāramitā are born the buddhas of the past, the future, and the present". Below this it shows its force by weighing merit: practising prajñā 「乃至彈指頃」 tr. "even for the space of a single finger-snap", his merit already surpasses teaching the beings of the three-thousand great-thousand world all to practise giving, the precepts, meditation, and wisdom, and so on up to obtaining the fruits of the two vehicles; practising it for a moment, for a day, or for a hundred kalpas, his merit surpasses still more teaching the beings of worlds as many as the sands of the Ganges in the ten directions. And one who abides as prajñā teaches is precisely avaivartika, 「如是方便力成就」 tr. "has thus accomplished the power of skilful means", and so on up to 「住法王子地,滿足諸願,常不離諸佛」 tr. "abides in the ground of the Dharma-prince, fulfils his vows, is never apart from the buddhas". In a long last section the sūtra lists its 「善知」 tr. "knows well" item by item: beginning from 「善知字門、善知非字門」 tr. "knows well the gates of letters, knows well what are not gates of letters", it goes through speech and the speech of men and women, form and so on up to consciousness, the nature of the world and the nature of nirvāṇa, the conditioned and the unconditioned, self-nature and other-nature, joined and dispersed, associated and non-associated, suchness and non-suchness, the nature of dharmas and the position of dharmas, the aggregates, elements, and sense-fields, the truths and the twelve links of causes and conditions, meditation and the immeasurable minds and the formless absorptions, the six perfections and the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the omniscience of all kinds, the contemplations, the emptinesses, giving up the path and not giving up the path, arising and ceasing and abiding-and-changing, desire, hatred, and delusion and non-desire, non-hatred, and non-delusion, view and non-view, name-and-form, the four conditions, the four truths, the five paths and the five destinies, the four fruits and four directions and the pratyekabuddha and the Buddha, the faculties, and so on up to the eleven kinds of wisdom, and on to the three times, skilful means, waiting for beings, the mind and the deep mind, meaning and words, ending with 「善知分別三乘」 tr. "knows well how to distinguish the three vehicles". And the Buddha gathers in this long list with one sentence: 「菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜、生般若波羅蜜、修般若波羅蜜,得如是等利益。」 tr. "The bodhisattva-mahāsattva who practises prajñāpāramitā, gives rise to prajñāpāramitā, and cultivates prajñāpāramitā obtains such benefits as these." What Treatise ② explains lies first in accounting for the Buddha's not sifting by capacity: Subhūti's meaning is that the four gates, 「以甚深故,利根者乃得入」 tr. "because they are very deep, only those of keen faculties can enter", while the Buddha's meaning is 「但一心精進欲學者可入」 tr. "anyone who with a single mind is vigorous and wishes to train can enter"; its simile is the plainest—「譬如熱時,清涼池,有目有足皆可入;雖近,不欲入者則不入。」 tr. "It is like a clear and cool pool in the time of heat: all who have eyes and have feet can enter; though it is near, one who does not wish to enter does not enter." Since it is not that the pool refuses anyone, what sifts lies only in wishing or not wishing to enter. The treatise-author further matches the four phrases in the sūtra to the noble path: 「不懈怠者是正精進,不妄念者是正念,不亂心者是正定,如等四門是正見,正見等安住是戒行——此八聖道能得般若波羅蜜。」 tr. "The not lazy is right vigour, the one without false thought is right mindfulness, the one without a disordered mind is right concentration, the four gates of suchness and the rest are right view, and right view and the rest abiding securely is the practice of the precepts—this eightfold noble path can obtain prajñāpāramitā." And why does Subhūti judge that those of keen faculties alone enter? 「須菩提小乘智短故」 tr. "Because Subhūti's knowledge, being of the Small Vehicle, is short." Why does the Buddha say that the middling and the dull all enter? 「佛此中以大悲氣故說『中根、鈍根皆可得入』。」 tr. "Here the Buddha, because of the breath of great compassion, says ‘those of middling faculties and dull faculties can all obtain entry’." Next it explains the relation between training in prajñā and training in the five perfections, first raising a difficulty against itself—「上說『但般若能至一切種智』,今何以言『與五波羅蜜合故得至』?」 tr. "Above it was said, ‘only prajñā can reach the omniscience of all kinds’; why is it now said, ‘one reaches it because it is joined with the five perfections’?" Its answer is that in the usual course one obtains it only by practising the six perfections together, except that 「或時有清淨佛國,但聞實相得至薩婆若,不用次第行諸波羅蜜」 tr. "at times there are pure buddha-lands where, merely by hearing the real mark, one reaches sarvajñā, without needing to practise the perfections in sequence". Last, it explains 「善知」 tr. "knows well" heading by heading, and of these the ones most worth carrying away are several: 「非字名如、法性、實際,此中無文字」 tr. "not-letters means suchness, the nature of dharmas, and the limit of reality: within these there are no letters"; knowing well giving up the path is 「從一地至一地,捨下地不憂,得上地不貪」 tr. "going from one ground to another ground, giving up the lower ground without sorrow and obtaining the higher ground without greed"; the eleven kinds of wisdom are each given their meaning: swift wisdom is 「速知諸法」 tr. "swiftly knowing dharmas", emerging wisdom is 「於種種難中能自拔出」 tr. "being able, amid various difficulties, to pull oneself out", penetrating wisdom is 「究盡通達」 tr. "thoroughly penetrating to the end", deep wisdom is 「觀一切法無量、無相、不可思議」 tr. "contemplating all dharmas as immeasurable, signless, and inconceivable", unequalled wisdom is 「於般若中不著般若」 tr. "not clinging to prajñā within prajñā", and jewel wisdom is likened to the wish-fulfilling jewel—「自無定色,隨前物而變;般若亦如是,自無定相,隨諸法行」 tr. "it has no fixed colour of its own but changes according to the thing before it; prajñā is likewise: it has no fixed mark of its own, and moves according to dharmas"; and the definition of the two Chinese characters 「方便」 tr. "skilful means" the treatise-author sets down most tightly only here: 「方便名欲成辦其事,能具足因緣多少得所,於中不令有失。如菩薩雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著。」 tr. "Skilful means names wishing to accomplish a matter, being able to bring about the full complement of causes and conditions, in the right measure of more and less, and within it not letting there be any loss. It is as the bodhisattva, though he practises emptiness, does not realise the limit of reality; though he practises merit, he also does not cling." Waiting for beings also has a simile: 「如估客、大將雖乘駃馬能疾到所止,故待眾人;菩薩亦如是,乘智慧駃馬,雖能疾入涅槃,亦待眾生故不入。」 tr. "As a merchant or a great general, though riding a swift horse he could swiftly arrive at the place where they stop, still waits for the others; the bodhisattva is likewise: riding the swift horse of wisdom, though he could swiftly enter nirvāṇa, he too, for the sake of waiting for beings, does not enter."

The difference among the three parts can be settled in one phrase: the First Part speaks of the guiding of prajñā and of the practitioner's losing, the Middle Part speaks of why it is so, and the Last Part speaks of the unobstructedness of its gate and of what those who enter obtain. What the First Part lists are mostly marks to be praised—simile after simile, round after round speaking of the excellence of prajñā; what the Middle Part gives are mostly principles to be asked about—for every simile it returns what is likened, for every difficulty it returns the reason; what the Last Part answers is a road that can be walked—it does not sift by capacity, it sifts only laziness. And through the three parts runs one thread, namely the two Chinese characters 「方便」 tr. "skilful means". The skilful means of Sūtra ① is 「我若不行方便力,不能度脫眾生生死」 tr. "if I do not practise the power of skilful means, I cannot deliver beings from birth and death", so skilful means is setting out to practise for the sake of beings; the skilful means of Treatise ① is the thirty-two marks and the eighty minor marks, and so on up to the ten powers and the four fearlessnesses, so skilful means is what practice accomplishes; the skilful means of Treatise ② is 「雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著」 tr. "though he practises emptiness, he does not realise the limit of reality; though he practises merit, he also does not cling", so skilful means is that portion of measured deliberation, between practice and emptiness, which does not fall to either extreme. Seen together, the three places make the meaning of skilful means complete: it arises from compassion, is accomplished through practice, and through not clinging is not lost. The reason the chapter's name bears 「大」 tr. "great" is also precisely this—not the greatness or smallness of a dexterity, but the breadth of whom it covers, the length of what it passes through, and the thoroughness of its not clinging.

Therefore, in reading each passage of this chapter, one can ask at least three layers. First: does this sentence speak of the virtue of prajñā, or of my sickness? The first half of Sūtra ① praises prajñā round after round, and reads very smoothly; but once one enters what follows 「若菩薩摩訶薩作是念」 tr. "if the bodhisattva-mahāsattva has this thought", every sentence is sickness—the sickness is not failing to practise, it is practising and having the thought; not failing to obtain, it is obtaining and grasping at marks. So whenever a good mark appears before one, first ask whether this mark is spoken of to be praised, or spoken of to be recognised. Second: is what this sentence breaks the matter, or the clinging? When the treatise-author breaks the joining of two fingers, he is not saying that fingers cannot join; he is saying 「指無定法」 tr. "a finger has no fixed dharma"; when he breaks clinging to emptiness, he is not saying that emptiness cannot be practised; he is saying 「般若波羅蜜是不著相」 tr. "prajñāpāramitā is of the mark of not clinging". Wherever one sees the treatise-author putting his strength into breaking, what is broken mostly lies in a single Chinese character rendered here as ‘fixed’: that there is fixedly a dharma that can be taken, fixedly a place that can be abided in, fixedly a person who is able to practise. Third: I am now of dull faculties and scattered mind—of what use is this chapter to me? The Last Part is set up precisely for this: the Buddha does not allow the judgement ‘only those of keen faculties enter’, and takes the clear and cool pool as a simile—the pool does not choose people; it chooses only those who have eyes and have feet and are willing to enter; so the four phrases of the eightfold noble path are, phrase by phrase, where I can set my hand today. Read on along the two sūtras and two treatises, and one will come to rest at last on that sentence in which the treatise-author explains skilful means: 「方便名欲成辦其事,能具足因緣多少得所,於中不令有失。」 tr. "Skilful means names wishing to accomplish a matter, being able to bring about the full complement of causes and conditions, in the right measure of more and less, and within it not letting there be any loss." What is called the great skilful means is nothing other than bringing to accomplishment, within ultimate emptiness and without losing any portion of it, a matter that must be accomplished.

Reading On in the Order of the Treatise

本品 3 葉Chapter contents · 3
  1. 69-01大方便品之上The Great Skilful Means, Part 1 of 3大方便品之上:方便力成就者發心久近、供佛多少、所種善根;般若照五度之日月輪寶夫婦軍將小王眾流右手一味前導諸喻;自性空中云何行六度而為眾生具足六度;諸波羅蜜無差別而般若第一最上微妙;不取不捨、不念則善根增益、不著故不住;取相三失與著無所有之失;不生是色誰色、不觀常無常;道與非道;念薩婆若而施戒忍進定慧並迴向;習行六度之不合不散與菴羅果喻;學般若得自在、大海最大喻、射師如意弓箭喻;十方諸佛以不可得故念;多有所學實無所學;略廣相之如相、實際、法性、不合不散四門;是名略攝般若,初發意至十地應學(經①)卷82
  2. 69-02大方便品之中The Great Skilful Means, Part 2 of 3大方便品之中:三問之釋、日月與輪寶九喻、五度入般若、三失與無失、菩薩道非菩薩道、如法性實際不合不散四門(論)卷82
  3. 69-03大方便品之下The Great Skilful Means, Part 3 of 3大方便品之下:是門利根所入之語與佛答鈍根中根散心一心學者皆入、不能入者四與能入者四、當如般若乃至檀波羅蜜所說而學則得一切智、行般若則魔事欲起即滅而十方現在諸佛憶念、乃至彈指頃之福德勝於教三千大千世界眾生行施戒定慧得諸果、應薩婆若念行般若從須臾至無量劫之福、如所說住則是阿鞞跋致與方便力成就乃至為眾生受身、善知字門非字門乃至善知分別三乘之大列目;論釋四門誰能入與清涼池之喻、八聖道能得般若、小乘智短與大悲氣、與五波羅蜜合故得至之問答、讚行般若人力勢、善知字與無字、一語二語多語、捨道不捨道、須陀洹人道果之別、二十二根與諸慧之訓、三世之善知、方便與待眾生、深心與義語、住二善知能以三乘度眾生、難解故解說易解者不說、廣略先後之問答(經+論)卷83
義疏 · 承衍Exposition · Further Resonances

承衍

〈大方便品〉之所承,接得比多數品都緊。前品〈六度相攝品〉通篇只說一事:住一波羅蜜中而取其餘五波羅蜜——「菩薩摩訶薩布施時,持是布施迴向薩婆若,於眾生中住慈身口意業。是為菩薩住檀波羅蜜取尸羅波羅蜜」,如是六度互取,至其末節收於「如是等菩薩利智慧故,一心中一時能具足六波羅蜜」。本品論①開卷即牒住這一句:「須菩提聞菩薩摩訶薩大利根相,所謂一波羅蜜邊能生五波羅蜜,行一波羅蜜即能具五波羅蜜,如上品中說;是事希有」——前品說的是能如此,本品問的是何以能如此,答案即在「方便」二字。所啟者,在本品末句已備其語。經②以「菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜、生般若波羅蜜、修般若波羅蜜,得如是等利益」收筆,行、生、修三字並列而未別釋;次品〈三慧品〉開卷,須菩提即就此三字逐一發問——「世尊!菩薩摩訶薩云何行般若波羅蜜?云何生般若波羅蜜?云何修般若波羅蜜?」佛答「色寂滅故,色空故,色虛誑故,色不堅實故,應行般若波羅蜜」,「如虛空生故,應生般若波羅蜜」,「修諸法破壞故,應修般若波羅蜜」。本品以三字結利益,次品即以三字開問答:本品所說是方便力之所成,次品所說是般若之行生修其相如何,一舉一釋,次第自明。

後來古德讀此品,於品名一事所存者頗可誌。本論底本題「大方便品第六十九」;而宋本卷題作「大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九品上」,宮本作「大智度論卷第八十二釋方便品第六十九品上」,元本作「大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九上」,皆無「大」字;明本作「大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九之上經作大方便品」,於論題用「方便品」而自註其所牒經文作「大方便品」,一本之內經題與論題互異,如實誌之;聖本作「大智度經論卷第八十二釋第六十八品上」,石本作「摩訶般若波羅蜜品第六十八方便品卷八十二」,題號皆較底本差一階,與前數品一貫。卷末續題亦然:底本卷八十二末之題,宋本、元本、宮本作「釋第六十九品上」,而石本作「釋第六十八品上」,差一階之例再見。卷八十三卷首「之餘」續題所繫尤繁:宋本作「大智度論卷八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品」,宮本作「大智度論卷第八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品」,元本作「大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九下訖第七十品上」,明本作「大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九之下」,石本作「摩訶般若波羅蜜品六十八卷八十三」,而聖本作「大智度經論卷第八十釋第六十品下訖第六十九品上」——聖本此處不惟品序差一階,卷序亦標「卷第八十」而非八十三,其書卷帙之分法顯與底本不同,兩存並錄不判。至於所釋大經之傳本,正題作「方便品第六十九」,而宋本、元本、明本、宮本皆作「大方便品」,聖本於品名之上冠經題而作「摩訶般若波羅蜜經方便」,品次則聖本作「第六十八」——是知明本論題下所註「經作大方便品」一語,於經之傳本中確有其據,非孤說。

古德之疏於此品,吉藏《大品經義疏》最詳。其所釋大經作「方便品第六十九」,而開卷即先辨「方便」一名在諸經中之寬狹:「法華明一乘為實,三是方便,故開方便門顯真實義」,而「勝經明一乘大方便,一乘尚是方便,三乘寧非方便?」兩造既立,遂自為進退之論——「若望道門,三一皆是為緣,故皆是方便」,「若望三乘是方便,即一乘非方便也」;而本經所言之方便,別有其界說:「今經云方便者,照空為實,遊空不著,涉有無滯,運用善巧,故名方便也。」又比其總別:「勝鬘總二慧為一乘,即若方便若實皆名為方便。今此中開一乘為二慧,故有實慧與方便也」,故曰「法華明一乘為實,勝鬘一乘為方便,皆是總義。今即開一乘為方便,故是別義也。」其科判分歎方便為三:「第一明昔因久遠歎行方便人,第二歎方便妙用窮能善巧,第三歎行方便人得無邊功德」,而三者之相生亦一語點破——「由久植因故得妙用,有妙用故得無邊功德也。」於初發心即具六度一事,吉藏設問而答之曰「發心畢竟二不別故,初是後初」,故「發心即作無生觀,故六度具足也」。十番譬喻,其書並存古解與依論二說,古解以十譬兩兩相配,而依論則云「初日月喻菩薩,二慧答四生也」,又云「眾生雖有世善無菩薩般若不見正道也」。眾流入海之疑,吉藏亦引論答之,曰「論云:薩婆若是般若異名」;其判行者之失為四——「失中四失」——與本論相發而更質直:「內著我、外著空,云我能行生、法二空」是初失,「破著空方是般若,復著般若即是著空」是第二失,「著菩薩道故失」是第三失,第四則是自居凡夫而以佛所知為人說法——「論云:著佛道故失」,且直責之曰「乃見有失不皆是失,見悟不悟皆是不悟也」。至於四門,吉藏特揭其非以三法為所觀之境:「人多謂如等三法為境,悟此三法生智,智與境合,故今明不合散也」;而略攝之義亦只在此——「略攝般若者,知如等四法故,便知略廣,名略攝般若也。」

另有一家古德為本論自身作疏。慧影《大智度論疏》於此品立專章,其開卷即釋品名與次第:「第六十八品者,名為方便品,即是方便門中第三品也。所以次六度相攝品後明此品者,上明菩薩於一度中而能具足諸波羅蜜,今明所以然者,由菩薩善巧方便故,所以如此,故次六度相攝品後明方便品」——其稱本品為第六十八品,與聖本、石本之差一階相合,是此一讀法於論疏一系亦有其傳;而其所判之次第因由,正與本論論①牒前品之語相應。其科判分全品為四分:「第一就人辨方便」,故先問成就久近、供養多少、發心時節,「菩薩即是方便之人,波若即是方便之法」;「第二從譬如日月周行照四天下,明波若方便導成眾行」;「第三明脩因得果,名為因果方便」;「第四明菩薩善學波若雙照二諦,名為照達方便」。於輪寶之喻,其書引經為況:「薩遮尼乾經云:雖有六寶,千子具足。若無輪寶者,但名似轉輪王,唯王一天下也。」於「除智慧,不可以餘法度脫眾生」一句,則引師子雷音佛國為釋,而歸於兩土之異:「此國唯以智慧得佛」,「若此間國土等始須福智二事得佛,如彼國者唯智慧得佛道也。」略廣相之釋亦簡而確——「略相即是總相,廣相即是別相,大小兩乘盡有此總別二相也」。須注意者,慧影此疏之現存文本即斷於本品之中:其末段釋至經文「云何菩薩摩訶薩知一切法略廣相」一問之下,曰「欲廣明之,故設此問也」,隨即接卷第二十四之卷末題而全書止,故其書於本品之標目下特註「不完」二字。其於本品後半之經②論②遂無所釋,非略而不釋,是其書現存至此而止,如實誌之,不作缺釋之推論。至於均正之四論綱要一書,遍檢「大方便品」「方便品第六十九」二目皆〔查無〕;天台一系之玄義、釋籤與止觀諸書,亦遍檢無此二目之文,不強牽合,如實誌之。

把這一路承衍帶回本品,兩造品名正照見本品義理之兩面。曰「方便品」者,舉其用——方便是用,故論主所釋者皆是用之相:三十二相八十隨形好是用,日月輪寶右手大海諸譬所導者是用,乃至「善知字門」以下一長串「善知」,無一非用。曰「大方便品」者,舉其所以大——所以大者有三:一在其久,「發心已來無量億阿僧祇劫」而「供養如恒河沙等諸佛」;二在其廣,其門不簡根器,「鈍根菩薩亦可入是門,中根菩薩、散心菩薩亦可入是門」;三在其不著,方便之為方便,正在「雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著」。三者缺一,方便即落為機巧而不名為大。兩名並存而不相妨:無「大」則不見其所歷之久與所被之廣,無「方便」則不見其為用而非為體。

因此,〈大方便品〉最終留下的,是一套可以帶進日用的分寸。我行一善而覺其力弱時,記得經中番番譬喻所說者只是一事——五度離般若則「不得波羅蜜名字」,所差者不在事之大小,在有無那一分不取相之照。我略有所得而起念「我今行般若波羅蜜、修般若波羅蜜」時,記得佛判此念為「若如是取相,則遠離般若波羅蜜」。我以空自持而不肯起行時,記得論主給的兩重藥:一是「我若不以方便力,則不可得度」,二是「雖諸善法和合能破煩惱、得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,而般若波羅蜜於中功力最大」——空不是不行之理由,是行而不失之保任。我自量鈍根散心而不敢入此門時,記得那個清涼池之喻:「有目有足皆可入;雖近,不欲入者則不入。」我不知從何下手時,記得論主把經中四句配成聖道之語——「不懈怠者是正精進,不妄念者是正念,不亂心者是正定,如等四門是正見」。而一品之末,論主釋「方便」之界說一句最宜牢記——「方便名欲成辦其事,能具足因緣多少得所,於中不令有失。」所謂大方便,說到底,不過是在一件非辦不可的事上,既不落空,也不落有,一分不失地辦成。

Further Resonances

What "The Great Skilful Means" inherits is joined more tightly than in most chapters. The preceding chapter, "The Six Perfections Contain One Another," speaks throughout of only one matter: abiding in one perfection and taking up the other five perfections—「菩薩摩訶薩布施時,持是布施迴向薩婆若,於眾生中住慈身口意業。是為菩薩住檀波羅蜜取尸羅波羅蜜」 tr. "When the bodhisattva-mahāsattva gives, he holds this giving and dedicates it to sarvajñā, and amid beings abides in kindly deeds of body, speech, and mind. This is the bodhisattva's abiding in dānapāramitā and taking up śīlapāramitā"—and in this way the six perfections take one another up, until at its last section it gathers them in with 「如是等菩薩利智慧故,一心中一時能具足六波羅蜜」 tr. "Bodhisattvas such as these, because their wisdom is keen, are able within a single mind, at a single time, to fulfil the six perfections." At the very opening of Treatise ① this chapter takes up that very sentence: 「須菩提聞菩薩摩訶薩大利根相,所謂一波羅蜜邊能生五波羅蜜,行一波羅蜜即能具五波羅蜜,如上品中說;是事希有」 tr. "Subhūti heard of the mark of the great keen faculties of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva—namely, that from the side of one perfection he can give rise to the five perfections, and that by practising one perfection he can fulfil the five perfections, as was said in the previous chapter; this matter is rare"—the preceding chapter said that it can be so; this chapter asks why it can be so, and the answer lies in the two Chinese characters 「方便」 tr. "skilful means". As for what it opens, the words for it are already in place in this chapter's last sentence. Sūtra ② closes with 「菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜、生般若波羅蜜、修般若波羅蜜,得如是等利益」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva practises prajñāpāramitā, gives rise to prajñāpāramitā, cultivates prajñāpāramitā, and obtains such benefits as these," the three words practise, give rise to, and cultivate standing side by side and not explained separately; at the opening of the next chapter, "The Three Wisdoms," Subhūti at once asks about these three words one by one—「世尊!菩薩摩訶薩云何行般若波羅蜜?云何生般若波羅蜜?云何修般若波羅蜜?」 tr. "World-Honored One! How does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva practise prajñāpāramitā? How does he give rise to prajñāpāramitā? How does he cultivate prajñāpāramitā?" The Buddha answers 「色寂滅故,色空故,色虛誑故,色不堅實故,應行般若波羅蜜」 tr. "Because form is quiescent, because form is empty, because form is false and deceptive, because form is not firm and real, one should practise prajñāpāramitā," 「如虛空生故,應生般若波羅蜜」 tr. "because it arises like space, one should give rise to prajñāpāramitā," and 「修諸法破壞故,應修般若波羅蜜」 tr. "because one cultivates the breaking up of dharmas, one should cultivate prajñāpāramitā." This chapter concludes its benefits with the three words, and the next chapter opens its questions and answers with the three words: what this chapter speaks of is what the power of skilful means accomplishes; what the next chapter speaks of is what the marks of the practising, the giving rise to, and the cultivating of prajñā are like—one raises it, the other explains it, and the sequence is clear of itself.

Among the later ancient masters who read this chapter, what they preserved on the matter of the chapter's name is well worth recording. This treatise's base text heads it 「大方便品第六十九」 tr. "Chapter Sixty-nine, The Great Skilful Means"; but the fascicle heading of the Song edition reads 「大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九品上」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-two, Explaining ‘Skilful Means’, Chapter Sixty-nine, First Part of the Chapter," the Palace edition reads 「大智度論卷第八十二釋方便品第六十九品上」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle the Eighty-second, Explaining ‘Skilful Means’, Chapter Sixty-nine, First Part of the Chapter," and the Yuan edition reads 「大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九上」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-two, Explaining ‘Skilful Means’, Chapter Sixty-nine, First Part"—none of them has the character 「大」 tr. "great"; the Ming edition reads 「大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九之上經作大方便品」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-two, Explaining ‘Skilful Means’, Chapter Sixty-nine, First Part; the sūtra has ‘The Great Skilful Means’," using 「方便品」 tr. "Skilful Means" in the treatise's title while noting of itself that the sūtra text it cites has 「大方便品」 tr. "The Great Skilful Means," so that within a single edition the sūtra's title and the treatise's title differ from each other, and this is recorded as it is; the Shōgozō manuscript reads 「大智度經論卷第八十二釋第六十八品上」 tr. "Great Wisdom-Crossing Sūtra-Treatise, Fascicle the Eighty-second, Explaining the Sixty-eighth Chapter, First Part of the Chapter," and the Ishiyama-dera manuscript reads 「摩訶般若波羅蜜品第六十八方便品卷八十二」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā, Chapter Sixty-eight, Skilful Means, Fascicle Eighty-two," the title numbering in both differing from the base text by one step, consistent with the several preceding chapters. The continuation titles at the fascicle's end are the same: for the title at the end of fascicle eighty-two of the base text, the Song, Yuan, and Palace editions read 「釋第六十九品上」 tr. "Explaining the Sixty-ninth Chapter, First Part of the Chapter," whereas the Ishiyama-dera manuscript reads 「釋第六十八品上」 tr. "Explaining the Sixty-eighth Chapter, First Part of the Chapter"—the case of a one-step difference is seen again. What attaches to the continuation title 「之餘」 tr. "continued" at the head of fascicle eighty-three is especially complex: the Song edition reads 「大智度論卷八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-three, Explaining the Sixty-ninth Chapter, Last Part of the Chapter, ending at the Seventieth Chapter, First Part of the Chapter, ‘Skilful Means’," the Palace edition reads 「大智度論卷第八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle the Eighty-third, Explaining the Sixty-ninth Chapter, Last Part of the Chapter, ending at the Seventieth Chapter, First Part of the Chapter, ‘Skilful Means’," the Yuan edition reads 「大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九下訖第七十品上」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-three, Explaining ‘Skilful Means’, Chapter Sixty-nine, Last Part, ending at the Seventieth Chapter, First Part of the Chapter," the Ming edition reads 「大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九之下」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-three, Explaining ‘Skilful Means’, Chapter Sixty-nine, Last Part," the Ishiyama-dera manuscript reads 「摩訶般若波羅蜜品六十八卷八十三」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā, Chapter Sixty-eight, Fascicle Eighty-three," while the Shōgozō manuscript reads 「大智度經論卷第八十釋第六十品下訖第六十九品上」 tr. "Great Wisdom-Crossing Sūtra-Treatise, Fascicle the Eightieth, Explaining the Sixtieth Chapter, Last Part of the Chapter, ending at the Sixty-ninth Chapter, First Part of the Chapter"—here the Shōgozō manuscript not only differs by one step in its chapter order, but also marks its fascicle order as 「卷第八十」 tr. "Fascicle the Eightieth" and not eighty-three; the way its book divides its fascicles is plainly different from the base text's, and both are kept and recorded side by side without judgement. As for the transmitted text of the great sūtra that it explains, the proper title reads 「方便品第六十九」 tr. "Chapter Sixty-nine, Skilful Means," whereas the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace editions all read 「大方便品」 tr. "The Great Skilful Means"; the Shōgozō manuscript crowns the chapter name with the sūtra's title and reads 「摩訶般若波羅蜜經方便」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, Skilful Means," and for the chapter order the Shōgozō manuscript reads 「第六十八」 tr. "the sixty-eighth"—from this it is known that the phrase the Ming edition notes under the treatise's title, 「經作大方便品」 tr. "the sūtra has ‘The Great Skilful Means’," truly has its grounds in the transmitted texts of the sūtra and is not an isolated claim.

Of the ancient masters' commentaries on this chapter, Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra is the most detailed. The great sūtra it explains reads 「方便品第六十九」 tr. "Chapter Sixty-nine, Skilful Means," and at the very opening he first distinguishes the breadth and narrowness of the name 「方便」 tr. "skilful means" across the sūtras: 「法華明一乘為實,三是方便,故開方便門顯真實義」 tr. "The Lotus makes clear that the One Vehicle is the real and that the three are skilful means, and therefore it opens the gate of skilful means and reveals the meaning of the true and real," while 「勝經明一乘大方便,一乘尚是方便,三乘寧非方便?」 tr. "the Śrīmālā makes clear the One Vehicle as the great skilful means; if even the One Vehicle is skilful means, how could the three vehicles not be skilful means?" The two sides having been set up, he then argues back and forth himself—「若望道門,三一皆是為緣,故皆是方便」 tr. "If it is viewed with respect to the gate of the path, the three and the one are all for the sake of conditions, and therefore all are skilful means," 「若望三乘是方便,即一乘非方便也」 tr. "if it is viewed with respect to the three vehicles as skilful means, then the One Vehicle is not skilful means"; and the skilful means of which this sūtra speaks has a definition of its own: 「今經云方便者,照空為實,遊空不著,涉有無滯,運用善巧,故名方便也。」 tr. "What this sūtra calls skilful means is this: illuminating emptiness is the real; roaming in emptiness without clinging, crossing into existence without obstruction, applying good skill—therefore it is called skilful means." He further compares the general and the specific: 「勝鬘總二慧為一乘,即若方便若實皆名為方便。今此中開一乘為二慧,故有實慧與方便也」 tr. "The Śrīmālā gathers the two wisdoms together as the One Vehicle, so that whether skilful means or the real, all are named skilful means. Now here the One Vehicle is opened into the two wisdoms, and therefore there are the wisdom of the real and skilful means," and therefore he says, 「法華明一乘為實,勝鬘一乘為方便,皆是總義。今即開一乘為方便,故是別義也。」 tr. "The Lotus makes clear the One Vehicle as the real, the Śrīmālā the One Vehicle as skilful means; both are the general sense. Now the One Vehicle is opened into skilful means, and therefore it is the specific sense." His sectional division divides the praise of skilful means into three: 「第一明昔因久遠歎行方便人,第二歎方便妙用窮能善巧,第三歎行方便人得無邊功德」 tr. "First, it makes clear that the former causes are long and distant, praising the person who practises skilful means; second, it praises the wondrous function of skilful means, exhausting its capacity for good skill; third, it praises the person who practises skilful means as obtaining boundless merit," and how the three give rise to one another he also lays bare in a single phrase—「由久植因故得妙用,有妙用故得無邊功德也。」 tr. "Because the causes have long been planted, the wondrous function is obtained; because there is the wondrous function, boundless merit is obtained." On the matter of the six perfections being fulfilled already at the first arousing of the mind, Jizang sets a question and answers it, saying 「發心畢竟二不別故,初是後初」 tr. "Because the arousing of the mind and the ultimate are not two and not separate, the first is the first of the later," and so 「發心即作無生觀,故六度具足也」 tr. "in arousing the mind one at once makes the contemplation of non-arising, and so the six perfections are fulfilled." On the ten rounds of similes, his book keeps side by side two explanations, the old explanation and the one that follows the treatise: the old explanation pairs the ten similes two by two, while the one that follows the treatise says 「初日月喻菩薩,二慧答四生也」 tr. "The first, the sun and moon, is a simile for the bodhisattva; the two wisdoms answer to the four kinds of birth," and further says 「眾生雖有世善無菩薩般若不見正道也」 tr. "Though beings have worldly goodness, without the bodhisattva's prajñā they do not see the right path." The doubt about the many streams entering the sea Jizang also answers by citing the treatise, saying 「論云:薩婆若是般若異名」 tr. "The treatise says: sarvajñā is another name for prajñā." His judgement of the practitioner's losing sets it at four—「失中四失」 tr. "the four losings within losing"—bringing out this treatise and being yet more plain and direct: 「內著我、外著空,云我能行生、法二空」 tr. "clinging inwardly to a self and outwardly to emptiness, saying: I am able to practise the two emptinesses of beings and of dharmas" is the first losing; 「破著空方是般若,復著般若即是著空」 tr. "only breaking the clinging to emptiness is prajñā; clinging again to prajñā is clinging to emptiness" is the second losing; 「著菩薩道故失」 tr. "because of clinging to the bodhisattva path, it is losing" is the third losing; and the fourth is placing oneself as an ordinary person and teaching the Dharma to people by what the Buddha knows—「論云:著佛道故失」 tr. "The treatise says: because of clinging to the Buddha path, it is losing"—and he rebukes it directly, saying 「乃見有失不皆是失,見悟不悟皆是不悟也」 tr. "Thus seeing that there is losing is itself nothing but losing; seeing awakened and not awakened is itself nothing but not being awakened." As for the four gates, Jizang specially points out that they do not take the three dharmas as the object contemplated: 「人多謂如等三法為境,悟此三法生智,智與境合,故今明不合散也」 tr. "People mostly take the three dharmas, suchness and the rest, as the object; awakening to these three dharmas gives rise to knowledge, and knowledge joins with the object; therefore it now makes clear neither joined nor dispersed"; and the meaning of the brief gathering also lies only here—「略攝般若者,知如等四法故,便知略廣,名略攝般若也。」 tr. "The brief gathering of prajñā: because one knows the four dharmas, suchness and the rest, one then knows the brief and the extensive; this is called the brief gathering of prajñā."

There is another ancient master who wrote a commentary on this treatise itself. Huiying's Commentary sets up a chapter of its own for this chapter, and at its very opening explains the chapter's name and its order: 「第六十八品者,名為方便品,即是方便門中第三品也。所以次六度相攝品後明此品者,上明菩薩於一度中而能具足諸波羅蜜,今明所以然者,由菩薩善巧方便故,所以如此,故次六度相攝品後明方便品」 tr. "The sixty-eighth chapter is named the chapter ‘Skilful Means’; it is the third chapter within the gate of skilful means. The reason this chapter is made clear after the chapter ‘The Six Perfections Contain One Another’ is that above it was made clear that the bodhisattva, within one perfection, is able to fulfil all the perfections; now it is made clear why this is so: it is because of the bodhisattva's good skill in skilful means that it is so; therefore after the chapter ‘The Six Perfections Contain One Another’ the chapter ‘Skilful Means’ is made clear"—his calling this chapter the sixty-eighth chapter agrees with the one-step difference of the Shōgozō and Ishiyama-dera manuscripts, so that this reading also has its transmission within the line of commentaries on the treatise; and the reason for the order that he judges corresponds exactly to the words with which Treatise ① of this treatise takes up the preceding chapter. His sectional division divides the whole chapter into four parts: 「第一就人辨方便」 tr. "The first distinguishes skilful means with regard to the person," and therefore it first asks how long ago it was accomplished, how many offerings were made, and at what time the mind was aroused—「菩薩即是方便之人,波若即是方便之法」 tr. "the bodhisattva is precisely the person of skilful means, prajñā is precisely the dharma of skilful means"; 「第二從譬如日月周行照四天下,明波若方便導成眾行」 tr. "the second, from ‘it is as the sun and moon go round, illuminating the four continents’, makes clear that prajñā and skilful means guide the many practices to completion"; 「第三明脩因得果,名為因果方便」 tr. "the third makes clear cultivating the cause and obtaining the fruit; it is called the skilful means of cause and fruit"; 「第四明菩薩善學波若雙照二諦,名為照達方便」 tr. "the fourth makes clear that the bodhisattva trains well in prajñā and illuminates both of the two truths; it is called the skilful means of illuminating penetration." On the simile of the wheel-jewel, his book cites a sūtra by way of comparison: 「薩遮尼乾經云:雖有六寶,千子具足。若無輪寶者,但名似轉輪王,唯王一天下也。」 tr. "The Sazhe Nirgrantha Sūtra says: though he has the six jewels and his thousand sons are complete, if he has no wheel-jewel, he is only called one resembling a wheel-turning king, ruling only one continent." On the sentence 「除智慧,不可以餘法度脫眾生」 tr. "apart from wisdom, one cannot deliver beings by any other dharma," he explains it by citing the buddha-land of Lion's Thunder-Voice, and comes to rest on the difference between the two lands: 「此國唯以智慧得佛」 tr. "In this land buddhahood is obtained by wisdom alone," 「若此間國土等始須福智二事得佛,如彼國者唯智慧得佛道也。」 tr. "In lands such as this one, one needs the two things, merit and wisdom, to obtain buddhahood; in a land like that one, the Buddha path is obtained by wisdom alone." His explanation of the brief and extensive marks is likewise concise and exact—「略相即是總相,廣相即是別相,大小兩乘盡有此總別二相也」 tr. "The brief mark is precisely the general mark; the extensive mark is precisely the specific mark; the two vehicles, great and small, both have these two marks, the general and the specific." What must be noted is that the extant text of this commentary of Huiying's breaks off right in the middle of this chapter: its last section explains as far as the question in the sūtra text 「云何菩薩摩訶薩知一切法略廣相」 tr. "How does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the brief and extensive marks of all dharmas?", and below it says 「欲廣明之,故設此問也」 tr. "wishing to make it clear at length, he therefore sets out this question," followed at once by the fascicle-end title of fascicle twenty-four, and the whole book stops; therefore under the heading of this chapter his book specially notes the two Chinese characters 「不完」 tr. "incomplete." Of Sūtra ② and Treatise ② in the latter half of this chapter, therefore, it has no explanation: it is not that it passes over them without explaining, but that its book as extant stops here—this is recorded as it is, and no inference of a missing explanation is made. As for Junzheng's book of essentials on the four treatises, a thorough search under both headings, 「大方便品」 tr. "The Great Skilful Means" and 「方便品第六十九」 tr. "Chapter Sixty-nine, Skilful Means," is in every case 〔not found〕; in the books of the Tiantai line—the Profound Meaning, the Annotations, and the books on calming and contemplation—a thorough search likewise finds no text under these two headings, and no connection is forced; this is recorded as it is.

Bringing this whole line of further resonances back to this chapter, the two parties to the chapter's name precisely illuminate the two faces of this chapter's meaning. The name 「方便品」 tr. "Skilful Means" picks out its function—skilful means is function, and so what the treatise-author explains is all the marks of function: the thirty-two marks and the eighty minor marks are function; what is guided in the similes of the sun and moon, the wheel-jewel, the right hand, and the great sea is function; and so on up to 「善知字門」 tr. "knows well the gates of letters" and the long string of 「善知」 tr. "knows well" from there onward—there is not one that is not function. The name 「大方便品」 tr. "The Great Skilful Means" picks out why it is great—and why it is great is threefold: first, in its length of time, 「發心已來無量億阿僧祇劫」 tr. "since arousing the mind, immeasurable koṭi of asaṃkhyeya kalpas," and 「供養如恒河沙等諸佛」 tr. "he has made offerings to buddhas as many as the sands of the Ganges"; second, in its breadth: its gate does not sift by capacity, 「鈍根菩薩亦可入是門,中根菩薩、散心菩薩亦可入是門」 tr. "the bodhisattva of dull faculties can also enter this gate; the bodhisattva of middling faculties and the bodhisattva of scattered mind can also enter this gate"; third, in its not clinging: skilful means is skilful means precisely in 「雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著」 tr. "though he practises emptiness, he does not realise the limit of reality; though he practises merit, he also does not cling." If one of the three is lacking, skilful means falls into mere cleverness and is not called great. The two names stand together without standing in each other's way: without 「大」 tr. "great" one does not see the length of time it has passed through and the breadth of those it reaches; without 「方便」 tr. "skilful means" one does not see that it is function and not substance.

So what "The Great Skilful Means" leaves us in the end is a sense of measure that can be carried into daily use. When I do one good deed and feel its power to be weak, I remember that what the similes of the sūtra say, round after round, is only one matter—the five perfections apart from prajñā 「不得波羅蜜名字」 tr. "do not obtain the name of pāramitā"; the difference lies not in the size of the deed but in whether or not there is that portion of illumination that does not grasp at marks. When I have attained a little and the thought arises, 「我今行般若波羅蜜、修般若波羅蜜」 tr. "I now practise prajñāpāramitā and cultivate prajñāpāramitā," I remember that the Buddha judges this thought as 「若如是取相,則遠離般若波羅蜜」 tr. "if he grasps at marks in this way, he is far from prajñāpāramitā." When I hold myself by emptiness and am unwilling to set out to practise, I remember the twofold medicine the treatise-author gives: the first is 「我若不以方便力,則不可得度」 tr. "if I do not use the power of skilful means, they cannot be delivered"; the second is 「雖諸善法和合能破煩惱、得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,而般若波羅蜜於中功力最大」 tr. "Though the wholesome dharmas, coming together, can break the afflictions and obtain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, yet among them the power and function of prajñāpāramitā are the greatest"—emptiness is not a reason for not practising; it is the safeguard of practising without losing. When I measure myself as of dull faculties and scattered mind and dare not enter this gate, I remember that simile of the clear and cool pool: 「有目有足皆可入;雖近,不欲入者則不入。」 tr. "All who have eyes and have feet can enter; though it is near, one who does not wish to enter does not enter." When I do not know where to set my hand, I remember the words with which the treatise-author matches the four phrases in the sūtra to the noble path—「不懈怠者是正精進,不妄念者是正念,不亂心者是正定,如等四門是正見」 tr. "The not lazy is right vigour, the one without false thought is right mindfulness, the one without a disordered mind is right concentration, the four gates of suchness and the rest are right view." And at the end of the chapter, the one sentence in which the treatise-author gives the definition of 「方便」 tr. "skilful means" is the one most fitting to hold firmly in memory—「方便名欲成辦其事,能具足因緣多少得所,於中不令有失。」 tr. "Skilful means names wishing to accomplish a matter, being able to bring about the full complement of causes and conditions, in the right measure of more and less, and within it not letting there be any loss." What is called the great skilful means is, in the end, nothing more than this: in a matter that must be accomplished, falling neither into emptiness nor into existence, and accomplishing it without losing a single portion.

考據Apparatus

一、科判

本品在《大智度論》釋《大品般若》之次第中屬〈釋餘品〉一段,跨卷八十二、八十三。品題「大智度論釋大方便品第六十九」〔T25 0632b14〕居卷八十二之首(卷首起題,與品六十一之品題居卷中者不同型),題下夾註「卷八十二」,次行造署「聖者龍樹造」〔T25 0632b17〕、譯署「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」〔T25 0632b18〕;前品〈六度相攝品第六十八〉訖處即本品起處。至卷八十二末題「大智度論卷第八十二」〔T25 0639b30〕,本品未竟,卷八十三以續題「大智度論釋大方便品第六十九之餘」〔T25 0639c03〕接之,續題下重出造署、譯署。兩處造署用字不同:卷八十二作「聖者龍樹造」〔T25 0632b17〕,卷八十三作「聖者龍樹菩薩造」〔T25 0639c06〕,多「菩薩」二字;本帳以兩處底本逐字重取,如實誌錄,不代為統一。訖於「緣,先略說,後廣說」〔T25 0641c05〕一句之末,次品〈三慧品第七十〉起〔T25 0641c06〕。

全品純漢字一萬三千零五(機械重計值·本帳以此為優先參考值);本帳析為三單元,之上(卷八十二經①)、之中(卷八十二論①)、之下(卷八十三之餘經②論②)三單元分計四千六百五十二、五千五百三十五、二千八百一十八,其和一萬三千零五與工具值精確相合,零差額——與品三十八至六十一各帳慣見之『結構行不入工具計數』口徑差不同型,因本品三單元為零漂移切分,品題、造譯二署、卷末題、續題諸結構行盡歸所屬單元,無一行落在單元之外。

切點取法:底本自身卷界(卷八十二末題〔T25 0639b30〕/卷八十三續題〔T25 0639c03〕)為第一優先切點,然卷八十二一段純漢字一萬零一百八十七(四千六百五十二加五千五百三十五),單獨仍逾析分門檻,故於卷八十二內再下沉一層,取【經】【論】標記轉換處〔T25 0635c05〕為第二切點——此處既是經文與論釋之界,亦是說者類型之轉換(佛說轉為論主釋),為底本自身之結構界而非任意切割。故成『卷八十二一分為二、卷八十三獨立』之三單元格局;卷間字數之懸殊(一萬零一百八十七比二千八百一十八,約三點六比一)為本品實況,如實誌之。

結構為二經二論,交替一輪:經①起〔T25 0632b19〕(卷八十二)、論①起〔T25 0635c05〕(卷八十二)、經②起〔T25 0639c08〕(卷八十三續題後)、論②起〔T25 0640c07〕(卷八十三)。兩論段皆以「釋曰:」起論(與品六十一之兩論段逕以「問曰:」起論者不同型,如實誌錄不強解)。頂層問答凡九組,之中七組、之下二組——本帳於兩單元漢字流各自逐字重算「問曰:」「答曰:」,之中七/七、之下二/二,兩數對稱無缺。另有「有人言」體之引述異說三則:論①一則〔T25 0637a27〕(「復有人言」),論②二則〔T25 0641a19〕(「有人言」)、〔T25 0641c04〕(「復有人言」);此為敘事體引異說,非『問曰/答曰』格式,不計入九組之數。經①一段說者交替逾五十次(須菩提問、佛答往復),為全品對話密度最高之段;經②則一問一答而止:起首「世尊!是門,利根菩薩摩訶薩所入」〔T25 0639c08〕為須菩提之語(論②自牒作「須菩提意:以四種門雖安隱,以甚深故,利根者乃得入」〔T25 0640c07〕,其下佛答作「無不入者。」,說者繫屬由論主自標),佛自〔T25 0639c09〕答起至論②起點〔T25 0640c07〕前更無問句插入,是全品唯一之單向長篇開示段。

二、術語考

方便·大方便。 品題所出,亦全品綱骨。本論底本作「大方便品」,宋元宮明四本作「方便品」,所釋經側恰成反向(詳第四目)。經①開篇即以『方便力成就』立問,須菩提所問者「是菩薩摩訶薩如是方便力成就者,發意已來幾時」〔T25 0632b19〕——不問方便之體,先問方便之久近,是本品立義之勢。論①釋「方便」之所指,逕舉果地功德為答:「方便者,所謂金色身、三十二相」〔T25 0636c14〕以下至十力、四無所畏、十八不共法、一切種智、大慈大悲,而歸其用曰「得如是力,假令妄語,人猶當信,何況實語」〔T25 0636c19〕——方便非巧計,是具足佛法而後能取信於眾生。論②復以「不證」定其分際:「方便名欲成辦其事,能具足因緣多少得所,於中不令有失」〔T25 0641b15〕,其驗處在「如菩薩雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著」〔T25 0641b17〕。

方便力成就之三問。 經①起首三問三答,本帳誌其為本品之階:問發心久近,答「是菩薩摩訶薩能成就方便力者,發心已來無量億阿僧祇劫」〔T25 0632b21〕;問供養幾佛,答「供養如恒河沙等諸佛」〔T25 0632b24〕;問種何等善根,答「從初發意已來,於檀波羅蜜無不具足」〔T25 0632b27〕。論①各為之開:發心久者「除大菩薩,於餘眾生無量億阿僧祇劫」〔T25 0635c09〕,久發心而未見佛者以「大罪因緣覆心故不見佛」〔T25 0635c11〕釋之,種善根者則立一界——「若以深心行六波羅蜜,為阿耨多羅三藐三菩提故作功德」〔T25 0635c17〕,是名『種善根』。

波羅蜜名字。 本品前半之樞紐語。經①立式:五度「若離般若波羅蜜,不得波羅蜜名字」〔T25 0632c08〕,反之「因般若波羅蜜,五波羅蜜得波羅蜜名字」〔T25 0633b10〕。論①申其所以:「菩薩雖行五波羅蜜,不得般若波羅蜜,不得名波羅蜜,以不破著心故」〔T25 0636a13〕;又判未入般若之五度「但名為行善法,有量有盡故」。故本品之「名字」非虛名,是有量與無量之分界。

薩婆若·般若異名。 論①自設一問:五度如眾流、般若應如大海,何以經言五度為般若所護而入薩婆若?答曰:「薩婆若即是般若異名」〔T25 0636b15〕,五度福德入般若中即得清淨般若,般若清淨故得佛道而變名薩婆若。故「入薩婆若」即是「入般若」,非別有所入。

不取不捨·不念·不住。 經①以三重遮詮說般若之行相:般若於一切法「無法可取、無法可捨」〔T25 0633c03〕;不取者即不念,「以念故著欲界、色界、無色界,不念故無所著」〔T25 0633c22〕;不念故不住,「不著故不住」〔T25 0633c28〕。論①以因果相似釋其必然:所行之法既畢竟空,能行之心亦應無所得無住處,「因果相似故」。

三失。 本品之要害,經①自列而論①自標其數。其一,著畢竟空:「若如是取相,則遠離般若波羅蜜」〔T25 0634a04〕,論①判之曰「是菩薩以我心外著空、內著我,不如般若行,故言遠離般若」〔T25 0637c03〕。其二,著無性而以為得般若:「上以著空故失,今以破空得般若,而著般若無性故失,失故不得受記」〔T25 0637c05〕。其三,著佛所行之道:菩薩念「諸佛知諸法無受相故,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」而為他開示,亦失;經自破之曰「佛於諸法無所知、無所得,亦無法可說」〔T25 0634a16〕。論①收之曰「菩薩著畢竟空、著無性、著菩薩所行道,佛說三種皆失」〔T25 0638a04〕。其所以得者亦止一句:「無所得故不貪貴佛、不輕賤餘人,於一切眾生其心平等」〔T25 0638a10〕。

略廣相·四門。 經①之終局。佛以四法答『云何知一切法略廣相』之問:知如相——「色如相,無生、無滅、無住異,是名色如相」〔T25 0635b11〕;知實際——「無際是名實際」〔T25 0635b16〕;知法性——「色性是名法性,是性無分、無非分」〔T25 0635b19〕;知不合不散——「是諸法自性無,云何有合有散」〔T25 0635b26〕。論①釋「非際是實際」〔T25 0639b04〕曰「無相可取,無定法可著」,釋「無分、無非分」曰「無分者,不可示此示彼,無分別、無相、無量」〔T25 0639b07〕,而「無非分」者不著此無相無量以破量相;復判法性之所以不見,在「有相、有量為麁,無相、無量為細」二事俱妨。論①又自設「眼見二指有合散」之難,以指無定法、少分合非合、指與分不一不異三重破之。

略攝般若波羅蜜。 品眼所在。須菩提於四門之後自作結語:「是名菩薩摩訶薩略攝般若波羅蜜」〔T25 0635b29〕,復判其學者之廣:「初發意菩薩摩訶薩應學,乃至十地菩薩摩訶薩亦應學」〔T25 0635c01〕。論①以「安隱道」訓其所以人人可學:「略攝聞是安隱道故,一切菩薩所應學」〔T25 0639b28〕。「略攝」非撮要之謂——論①明言略廣二相皆由知如、法性、實際、不合不散四法而得,故「略攝」者攝之於四門,不是省其廣。

是門。 卷八十三之起語承四門而來:「世尊!是門,利根菩薩摩訶薩所入」〔T25 0639c08〕。佛不許其限:「鈍根菩薩亦可入是門,中根菩薩、散心菩薩亦可入是門;是門無礙」〔T25 0639c09〕,唯「懈怠、少精進、妄憶念、亂心者所不能入」〔T25 0639c11〕。論②以八聖道釋其八法:「不懈怠者是正精進,不妄念者是正念,不亂心者是正定」〔T25 0640c12〕,如等四門是正見,正見等安住是戒行;復判二人之異——「須菩提小乘智短故」〔T25 0640c15〕而但說利根能入,「佛大乘大智故」〔T25 0640c16〕而說中根鈍根八法和合亦能入是四門;其所以然,論②歸之於悲——「佛此中以大悲氣故說」〔T25 0640c18〕中根、鈍根皆可得入。本品之「無礙」,不在法之易,在門之不擇人。

善知諸目。 經②末之長列,自「當知是菩薩善知字門、善知非字門」〔T25 0640a27〕起,至「善知分別三乘」止,逐目列菩薩之知。論②逐項為訓,而非泛說:字門者「如文字陀羅尼中說」〔T25 0641a03〕,非字門者「非字名如、法性、實際,此中無文字」〔T25 0641a04〕;其得二者之由在福德——「集諸福德道故,善知字;破福德中顛倒故,善知無字」〔T25 0641a07〕。捨道者「菩薩從一地至一地,捨下地不憂,得上地不貪」〔T25 0641a13〕,不捨道者住是地中。果位之目亦逐字訓:「善知須陀洹者,人也;須陀洹道者,見諦道也」〔T25 0641a16〕,果則第十六心、心數法及無漏戒等諸法。

十一慧。 經②「善知諸根」之後列慧之十一目(慧、疾慧、有力慧、利慧、出慧、達慧、廣慧、深慧、大慧、無等慧、寶慧)〔T25 0640b28〕,論②逐目為義:總相者曰慧,「疾慧者,速知諸法」〔T25 0641a23〕;疾而力弱者如馬,有力而不利者「譬如鈍斧雖有大力,不能破物」〔T25 0641a25〕;「出慧者,於種種難中能自拔出」〔T25 0641a26〕,「達慧者,究盡通達」〔T25 0641a27〕,廣慧者道俗經書論議無不悉知,「深慧者,觀一切法無量、無相、不可思議」〔T25 0641b01〕,大慧者總具上諸慧,「無等慧者,於般若中不著般若」〔T25 0641b06〕,「寶慧者,如如意寶,自無定色,隨前物而變」〔T25 0641b09〕。此十一目本帳逐字回數經②原列,得十一,非十;論②之訓於有力、利二目合說,於深慧之下別出「世間深智慧」一義,故訓目之數與列目之數不必一一對當,如實誌之。

三、譬喻與故事

本品要喻分四束:經①喻般若導五度一束(九喻連舉),經①喻般若最上與學般若一束(須彌同色、玉女寶、種果、大海、射師、四兵、善御),論①釋失得一束(健將、主將得功名、種穀穢草、勇士入陣、年長笑小時、地水風空、樹果),論②釋根器與慧目一束(清涼池、鈍斧、鳥子、如意寶、估客待眾、父母撾子)。經之喻皆在顯般若之勝,論之喻皆在防行人之失,兩相配合正是本品「方便」二字之骨。

九喻(經①自出·連舉一束)。 自「譬如日月周行,照四天下,多有所益」〔T25 0632c03〕起,連舉九喻以明般若於五度之用:日月照四天下、轉輪聖王之輪寶、「譬如無夫婦人,易為侵凌」〔T25 0632c10〕與有夫婦人難可侵凌、軍將鎧仗具足、諸小國王隨時朝侍、眾川萬流皆入恒河、「譬如人之右手,所作事便」〔T25 0632c20〕而左手造事不便、眾流入海合為一味、轉輪聖王四種兵輪寶在前導。其歸結在「導五波羅蜜到薩婆若,常是中住,不過其處」〔T25 0632c28〕。論①逐喻為釋:日月喻取二氣成物之義,「月是陰氣,日是陽氣,二氣和合故萬物成長」〔T25 0636a04〕,而人雖有眼無日月則無所見,「眾生雖有世俗善根利智,不得般若波羅蜜照明,尚不得二乘」〔T25 0636a10〕;無夫婦人之喻則約於心,「若菩薩乃至能自以身命布施,若無般若,其心易破,如無夫之婦」〔T25 0636a14〕;右手之喻論①易其語作「譬如人之右手,自然穩便」〔T25 0636b20〕;輪寶前導之喻則以導師為配,「如導師在前,餘伴隨逐,進止取捨,皆隨導師,不得自在」〔T25 0636b23〕。吉藏數此一束為「十譬」〔X24n0451 0320b01〕,其計法與本帳所列九目之分合稍異,並錄不判,詳〈六、諸家異釋〉。

健將器仗喻(論①易經之軍將喻)。 經①作軍將鎧仗,論①作健將:「譬如健將,善知戰法,器仗具足,不畏怨敵」〔T25 0636a25〕,隨即自配其喻體——「健將即是菩薩,器仗是般若」〔T25 0636a26〕。所不能壞者,論①逐一指實:增上慢者是「未得聖道,意謂已得」,外道梵志諸魔民,乃至菩薩旃陀羅(其人之相,論①不自立而繫之他品,見第七目)。

須彌同色·玉女寶(經①出·論①承)。 諸波羅蜜之無差別,經①以色身到山為喻:「譬如種種色身,到須彌山王邊,皆同一色」〔T25 0633b11〕;論①承之而補一問答之防——不得因其同色遂謂山不足稱大,「五波羅蜜未入般若時,有差別;既入般若,則無差別」〔T25 0636c28〕。般若之最上則以玉女寶為喻,經①作閻浮提眾女人中玉女寶第一最上最妙,論①約其語作「譬如玉女寶,於眾女中最為第一」。

種果喻(經①出·論①配其四事)。 經①以種子喻習行六度:「譬如士夫欲食菴羅果、若波羅那婆果,當種其子」〔T25 0634c23〕,隨時溉灌守護,時節和合乃得果食。論①逐一配之:「樹是般若波羅蜜,菓是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」〔T25 0638b28〕,人是行者,水是五波羅蜜——四事既配,則種般若子而以五度灌之,果自時至,此經所謂「當種其子」之實義。

射師如意弓箭(經①出·論①推其所不能壞)。 「譬如射師,執如意弓箭,不畏怨敵」〔T25 0635a12〕,菩薩行般若乃至一切種智,魔若魔天所不能壞;論①推其勢曰「若菩薩能如是一切法中行自在般若,魔、若魔人所不能勝,何況增上慢及邪見人!」。

主將得功名·種穀穢草·勇士入陣(論①自出三喻)。 諸善法和合亦能破煩惱,何以獨歸功般若?論①答之以軍功:「雖諸善法和合能破煩惱、得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,而般若波羅蜜於中功力最大」〔T25 0637a25〕,「譬如大軍摧敵,而主將得功名」〔T25 0637a27〕。善根何以取相則不增?「雖有善根,以取相著心顛倒故不增長;譬如種穀,其苗雖好,穢草多故,不能增長」〔T25 0637b18〕。菩薩何以為諸佛所念?「譬如勇士入陣,破賊而不被瘡,則為主所念」〔T25 0638c18〕——破賊而不被瘡,正配具足六度而不著六度。

地水風空·年長笑小時(論①自出二喻)。 無住之義,論①以四層相住為喻:「如地住於水,水住於風,風住於空,空無所住」〔T25 0638b24〕,以本無住處故一切都無住。得實相而後知世間之所著皆虛誑者,則喻以人之長大:「譬如人年既長大,乃知小時所行皆愚癡可笑」〔T25 0639a26〕——非別有所得,是既出而後知其可笑。

師子雷音佛國(論①引經·異說之證)。 論①於『諸善法不得般若不得至薩婆若』一義之後,別出一說:「復有人言」者謂般若不得諸善法亦獨能至薩婆若,其證即引「師子雷音佛國,寶樹莊嚴」〔T25 0637b01〕一段——其土人民生便聞樹出畢竟空、無生無滅之法音,故不起惡心而得無生法忍,何有布施持戒等功德?復舉狂人、醉人從佛聞四諦即時得道為例。此為本品唯一之他方佛國引證,論主以「復有人言」標之,非自說,本帳如實誌其繫屬(參第七目)。

清涼池·鈍斧·鳥子·如意寶(論②自出四喻)。 四門之不擇人,論②喻以熱時之池:「譬如熱時,清涼池,有目有足皆可入;雖近,不欲入者則不入」〔T25 0640c10〕——有目有足即是八法,不欲入者自不入,非門有遮。慧之利鈍,喻以馬與斧:疾而力弱如馬,有力而不利則「譬如鈍斧雖有大力,不能破物」〔T25 0641a25〕。根之具不具,喻以鳥子:「如鳥子自知毛羽具足,爾乃可飛」〔T25 0641a21〕——此喻本繫於「有人言」一段(見第七目)。寶慧則喻以如意寶:「寶慧者,如如意寶,自無定色,隨前物而變」〔T25 0641b09〕,般若亦自無定相而隨諸法行。

估客待眾·父母撾子·鴦崛魔羅(論②末三事)。 菩薩能疾入涅槃而不入,論②喻以商旅之待人:「如估客、大將雖乘駃馬能疾到所止,故待眾人」〔T25 0641b18〕。深心之義則以親子之事明之:「如父母撾子,外惡內善;如佛度鴦崛魔羅」〔T25 0641b22〕——知其淺心雖惡而深心實善,故可度。鴦崛魔羅本事論②不展開,唯舉其名為證,本帳誌其為舉例而非敘事,不代為補述。

四、所釋經文

品名兩造全帳(本論側·底本「大方便品」·宋元宮明四本「方便品」·聖石負一階)。 品題〔T25 0632b14〕之校勘條一條七造,本帳逐字取底本原樣誌之:「大智度論釋大方便品第六十九(卷八十二)【大】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九品上【宋】|大智度論卷第八十二釋方便品第六十九品上【宮】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九上【元】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九之上經作大方便品【明】|大智度經論卷第八十二釋第六十八品上【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第六十八方便品卷八十二【石】」。四事並見:其一,底本(大正)作「大方便品」;其二,宋元宮明四本論題皆作「方便品」,無「大」字;其三,【明】本題下自註「經作大方便品」——同一本之內,論題用「方便」而自報經題用「大方便」,本自誌其兩名之分繫;其四,【聖】【石】二本作「第六十八」,較底本少一階,與品四十四至六十一一貫之『聖石負一階』型延續無斷。兩造並錄不判。

所釋經 T223 側之兩造——恰與本論成反向(本帳新檢)。 所釋經《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》本品正題逕作「方便品第六十九」〔T08 0368c07〕(其品題行無「摩訶般若波羅蜜經」之書題冠首,與鄰品之體例不同)。其品名之校記(注號 0368011)底本原樣作「方便【大】,大方便【宋】【元】【明】【宮】,摩訶般若波羅蜜經方便【聖】」,品號之校記(注號 0368012)作「六十九【大】,六十八【聖】」——即:所釋經側之底本(大正)作「方便」,而宋元明宮四本反作「大方便」;本論側之底本作「大方便」,而宋元宮明四本反作「方便」。兩造於經、論之間恰成反向,與品六十一之『夢中不證/夢誓』反向同型。且本論【明】本夾註自報「經作大方便品」,正與所釋經側【明】本作「大方便」相合,兩側互證無矛盾。【聖】本於經側亦作「六十八」,其負一階貫於經論兩側。兩造並錄,不以孰為正。

T223 mulu 屬性 n 之實況(本帳全書重掃·訂正前帳之局部讀法)。 所釋經 T223 側 mulu 編碼層:本品對應 mulu 顯文作「69 方便品」,其 n 屬性標「70」〔T08 0368c07〕。本帳不以鄰接數品之局部觀之,逕就 T223 全書九十條品級 mulu 逐條重算 n 與顯文題號之差:n 等於題號加一者五十條,n 等於題號者四十條,並有十三個 n 值為二品共用(重出)。故 T223 之 mulu n 屬性為全書性之不齊,非某品之個別瑕疵;本品之 n 標七十,屬『加一』之多數型,於其所在之一段(品六十五至品六十七、品六十九至品七十一皆加一)中並無異常。至於重出之 n 六十八,其二品為品六十七〈無盡品〉與品六十八〈攝五品〉,皆在本品之前,非本品之事。本帳誌此為底本編碼層之實況,不強解其成因,亦不以之為本品經文內容之缺陷。

卷八十二末題與卷八十三續題(負一階之續證)。 卷八十二末題「大智度論卷第八十二」〔T25 0639b30〕處有校勘二條,底本原樣作「論【大】|經【石】」與「二【大】|二釋第六十九品上【宋】【元】【宮】|二釋第六十八品上【石】」——【石】本再度作「第六十八」,其負一階與品題處一致。卷八十三續題〔T25 0639c03〕之校勘條一條七造,底本原樣作「大智度論釋大方便品第六十九之餘(卷八十三)【大】|大智度論卷八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品【宋】|大智度論卷第八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品【宮】|大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九下訖第七十品上【元】|大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九之下【明】|大智度經論卷第八十釋第六十品下訖第六十九品上【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品六十八卷八十三【石】」。此中【宋】【宮】【元】三本自報本卷所釋「訖第七十品上」,即其卷八十三兼含次品〈三慧品〉之一段,與底本之卷界不同;【聖】本此處之歧異幅度顯著大於單純之負一階——卷序作「卷第八十」(較底本少三卷),所釋作「第六十品下訖第六十九品上」,與底本「第六十九之餘」不同構。本帳誌錄不判此為聖本別行卷帙分法所致抑或另有訛脫(底本 byte 已如實摘錄,其解讀屬版本卷次之事,非本品義理)。【石】本作「摩訶般若波羅蜜品六十八卷八十三」,維持一貫之負一階。

全量牒經對讀(兩側對勘·對照組四串·兩向各報實數)。 本論經①開篇與所釋經〈方便品〉逐字幾近同文。本帳設對照組四串,於 T25n1509 與 T08n0223 兩檔各自以漢字流獨立全掃,雙向報實數:「五波羅蜜得波羅蜜名字」T25 一見〔T25 0633b10〕/T08 一見〔T08 0369c03〕;「無夫婦人」T25 一見〔T25 0632c10〕/T08 一見〔T08 0369a01〕——二串皆兩檔各唯一見,對位唯一,可為本品經段與所釋經對讀之錨。另誌兩串非唯一者以明對照組之界:「善知字門」T25 二見(經②一、論②一)/T08 一見(經側無論段,故一);「略攝般若波羅蜜」T25 四見/T08 三見。負命題不以零命中立,正命題亦不以單向計數立,兩向各報實數如上。

所釋經 T223 側本品範圍與校記數。 T223 側本品範圍自〔T08 0368c07〕(品題)起,至〔T08 0373a09〕(次品〈三慧品第七十〉mulu)前訖。本帳以 T223 校勘條之起錨獨立重掃,得本品範圍內校勘條六十八條,其中 star-corresp 重引條七條。其逐條全量對帳本帳未展開(唯 mulu 序列全書九十條、品題兩造二注已逐字核,見上),據實誌其未展開,待後續補查,不以估值充數。

五、般若義眼

本品之眼,在把「方便」從權巧之義推到『具足而不取』之義——具足六度而後有力,不取一法而後無失;二者合,名為大方便。其義可約為五重。

其一,方便之本在久行而非在巧。經①三問三答,所問者久近、供養、善根,皆非技巧之事;答之以「發心已來無量億阿僧祇劫」〔T25 0632b21〕、「供養如恒河沙等諸佛」〔T25 0632b24〕、「從初發意已來,於檀波羅蜜無不具足」〔T25 0632b27〕。論①更以菩薩之「希有」明其所以:「無始生死已來集諸惡法,菩薩心後來,而能用後來心,不隨先所集惡心,是為希有」〔T25 0635c25〕——後起之心能勝先集之惡,方便之力在此,不在機巧。

其二,五度之得名唯由般若。九喻所同歸者一句:「若離般若波羅蜜,不得波羅蜜名字」〔T25 0632c08〕,反之「因般若波羅蜜,五波羅蜜得波羅蜜名字」〔T25 0633b10〕。論①判其所以:不得般若則「不得名波羅蜜,以不破著心故」〔T25 0636a14〕。故本品之「導」非在先後之序,在破著與不破著之別——輪寶在前導而輪亦不離其處,經自言「導五波羅蜜到薩婆若,常是中住,不過其處」〔T25 0632c28〕。

其三,自性空而行六度不相礙。須菩提之難最直:「世尊!若一切法自性空,云何菩薩摩訶薩行六波羅蜜當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」〔T25 0633a09〕。佛不破其空,反於空中立方便:菩薩行六度時作是念「是世間心皆顛倒,我若不行方便力,不能度脫眾生生死」〔T25 0633a12〕,於是捨物而念「我無所捨」、不破戒、不瞋、不懈怠、不散亂、不離智慧,一一「能具足」。論①以世俗第一義二語釋其不相礙:「世人不可但為說諸法實相,聞則迷悶,生於疑悔」〔T25 0637a10〕,故「是故以第一義為心,用世俗語言為說」〔T25 0637a11〕。空是心,說是語,二者不相奪。

其四,三失一得,失皆在著而不在所著之法。空可著、無性可著、佛所行之道亦可著,故論①判「菩薩著畢竟空、著無性、著菩薩所行道,佛說三種皆失」〔T25 0638a04〕。其中最難覺者是第三——所著者既是佛之所知,何以為失?經自答之曰「佛於諸法無所知、無所得,亦無法可說」〔T25 0634a16〕;論①復示其得處在平等,「無所得故不貪貴佛、不輕賤餘人,於一切眾生其心平等」〔T25 0638a10〕。貪貴佛與輕賤餘人是同一病之兩面,此本品誌失之最要一句。

其五,四門略攝而門不擇人。經①以如、實際、法性、不合不散四法收一切法之略廣相,須菩提遂結之曰「是名菩薩摩訶薩略攝般若波羅蜜」〔T25 0635b29〕,而學者之廣自初發意至十地。卷八十三承此而問是門之所入,佛答「是門無礙」〔T25 0639c10〕,唯懈怠亂心者不入。論②以八聖道配其八法,復自判二人之異:小乘智短故但說利根能入,佛以大悲故說中鈍皆入。故「略攝」與「無礙」為一事之兩說——攝之於四門,故其法略;不擇於三根,故其門無礙。至於方便之極致,論②以一句收之:「如菩薩雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著」〔T25 0641b17〕——行空而不證,正是本品所謂大方便。

六、諸家異釋

《大智度論》本無逐文全疏之傳統,古德引釋率屬據實偏倚。本品古德覆讀二家皆存專章:釋所釋經之吉藏疏全段完整,釋本論之慧影疏覆蓋本品前半而止於其書之末;均正書中無本品之引,天台兩系四部亦零命中。逐家誌之。

吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451)·本品全段完整覆蓋·並二解之並存。 於所釋經〈方便品〉之逐文疏,起〔X24n0451 0319c21〕(內文品題「方便品第六十九」,緊接品六十八〈攝五品〉疏訖處),迄〔X24n0451 0321c20〕(次品題「三慧品第七十」〔X24n0451 0321c21〕前訖);卷首總目亦作「方便品第六十九」〔X24n0451 0195c07〕,總目與內文品題同名,無歧;其品名從所釋經底本作「方便」而不作「大方便」。其開篇即以他經定「方便」之位:「法華明一乘為實,三是方便,故開方便門顯真實義。」〔X24n0451 0319c22〕,次舉勝鬘一乘大方便之說,而後自定本經之義——「今經云方便者,照空為實,遊空不著,涉有無滯,運用善巧,故名方便也。」〔X24n0451 0320a04〕,並自判其與法華、勝鬘之別在總別:「今此中開一乘為二慧,故有實慧與方便也。」〔X24n0451 0320a06〕。其科本品為三:「上明方便體及方便用竟,今第三歎釋方便勸學者修行。」〔X24n0451 0320a08〕,三歎之目為「第一明昔因久遠歎行方便人,第二歎方便妙用窮能善巧,第三歎行方便人得無邊功德。」〔X24n0451 0320a10〕。於經①連舉之喻,吉藏數之曰「初有十譬。古解言:十譬兩三相著,皆是歎上無盡品中三事也。」〔X24n0451 0320b01〕——其「十譬」之數與本帳所列之九目分合稍異,並錄不判,而「古解」之配屬(歎前品三事)為吉藏所引他家之說,非其自判,本帳誌其繫屬不代會通。吉藏復自云其釋多依本論:「依論,初日月喻菩薩,二慧答四生也。」〔X24n0451 0320b06〕、「答:論云:薩婆若是般若異名」〔X24n0451 0320b10〕、「論云:著佛道故失。」〔X24n0451 0320c15〕——三處皆明標所依。於失之數,吉藏作四而本論作三:吉藏標「失中四失:」〔X24n0451 0320c06〕,以著空、著空空、著菩薩道、著佛道為四;本論論①則作「三種皆失」〔T25 0638a06〕。二數並錄不判:吉藏之四係將「著空」與「著空空」分列,本論則於前二失中自有分合,兩家所據之經文同而析目不同,本帳不代為會通。於廣略,吉藏並列二解而不取一:「一解云:八萬法藏為廣,一部為略,乃至一長行為廣,一偈為略也。」〔X24n0451 0321b07〕、「二解云:略廣是總別義也。」〔X24n0451 0321b08〕——此二解恰與本論論①之兩層說相應(論①先以八萬四千法聚為廣、小品為略,復以空無相無作為略、種種別相為廣),本帳誌其相應而不判其為承受。至於經②善知諸目之訓,吉藏與本論論②多相合,其最顯者為果位一目:吉藏作「須陀洹者,道人也。須陀洹道者,見諦道也。須陀洹果者,十六心心法及無漏戒等法是也。」〔X24n0451 0321c05〕,本論論②作「善知須陀洹者,人也;須陀洹道者,見諦道也」〔T25 0641a16〕而果為第十六心心數法及無漏戒等諸法——兩家語序、訓義幾近同文,唯詳略小異;又如無等慧一目,吉藏作「於波若中亦不著般若,此釋妙絕無所為喻名無等慧」〔X24n0451 0321c14〕,本論作「無等慧者,於般若中不著般若」〔T25 0641b06〕。本帳如實誌其相合,不判孰承孰受。復有名相與繫屬二事,二家相違,並錄不判。其一,十一慧之末目,吉藏作「如如意寶能滿心願名為實慧」〔X24n0451 0321c15〕,本論作「寶慧者,如如意寶,自無定色,隨前物而變」〔T25 0641b09〕——所取之如意寶喻同,而名一作實慧、一作寶慧,屬名相異稱,本帳誌錄不判,不代擇一。其二,義與語二目之繫屬,吉藏作「得義法亦無礙為善知語,得辭及樂說故知義,具此四能說三乘」〔X24n0451 0321c16〕,本論作「得義無礙、法無礙故,名善知義。辭無礙、樂說無礙故,名善知語。」〔T25 0641b26〕——二家同以四無礙分配義、語二目,而所繫正相反:吉藏以義無礙、法無礙屬語,以辭無礙、樂說無礙屬義,本論反之。此屬繫屬之異,非詳略之差,本帳如實並錄,不判孰是。

慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791)·本品之疏即其全帙之末章。 本品之疏起〔X46n0791 0916c15〕,其標目底本原樣作「釋大方便品第六十九(不完)」〔X46n0791 0916c15〕,標目下逕注「釋第八十二卷論」;此為 X46n0791 全書之最末一個標目,其疏文連續至〔X46n0791 0917b10〕,其下即卷二十四之尾題〔X46n0791 0917b12〕,全書終。標目用字從本論底本作「大方便」,而疏文自稱品號則作第六十八:「第六十八品者,名為方便品,即是方便門中第三品也。」〔X46n0791 0916c16〕——其號恆較底本少一,與底本【聖】【石】二本之負一階同向,是本品所見負一階讀法之第三個獨立文獻源。其科次第之語曰「所以次六度相攝品後明此品者,上明菩薩於一度中而能具足諸波羅蜜,今明所以然者,由菩薩善巧方便故,所以如此,故次六度相攝品後明方便品。」〔X46n0791 0916c17〕——以前品之『一度具足諸度』為所以然之問,而以本品之「善巧方便」為其答,與本論論①開首承前品之語同向。其判本品為四分:「就此品中大有四分:第一就人辨方便,是故善吉問成就久近、供養佛多少、發心時節,菩薩即是方便之人,波若即是方便之法。」〔X46n0791 0916c21〕、「第二從譬如日月周行照四天下,明波若方便導成眾行。」〔X46n0791 0916c23〕、「第三明脩因得果,名為因果方便。」〔X46n0791 0917a01〕、「第四明菩薩善學波若雙照二諦,名為照達方便。有此四意。」〔X46n0791 0917a01〕。其釋日月喻曰「明譬如日月周行陰陽、周行四域,多有所益。波若、方便二法亦爾。其猶日月,葢眾行也。」〔X46n0791 0917a04〕;釋輪寶則引他經為證,「若無輪寶者,但名似轉輪王,唯王一天下也。」〔X46n0791 0917a07〕;於本論論①所引師子雷音佛國一段,慧影亦取之而判曰「此國唯以智慧得佛,如諸天等雖有福德而不能至佛,」〔X46n0791 0917a16〕。其疏之末二節釋略廣:「略相即是總相,廣相即是別相,大小兩乘盡有此總別二相也,」〔X46n0791 0917b04〕、「云何菩薩摩訶薩知一切法略廣相已下,欲廣明之,故設此問也。」〔X46n0791 0917b09〕。故慧影現存之疏,其覆蓋止於本品經①「略廣相」一問之處,論①以下及卷八十三之餘皆無疏——此即 CBETA 標目所注「(不完)」之實指:其書之殘,斷在本品之中,非斷在本品之首。本帳誌此事實,不由之推斷慧影未曾疏及其餘(無文可徵者即無文可徵,不作缺釋之判)。另誌:X46n0791 卷首總目亦列「釋大方便品第六十九」一目,與內文標目一致;本帳之逐字引一律繫內文標目,不繫總目。

均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784)·零命中(如實誌)。 「大方便品」「方便品第六十九」「略攝般若波羅蜜」「五波羅蜜得波羅蜜名字」「無夫婦人」「善知字門」六串於 X46n0784 全檔以漢字流回搜,逐串零命中。此書為四論宗義綱要體,非逐品隨文釋,零命中屬體裁使然,非缺陷,亦不以零命中反推均正無涉本品之義。

天台兩系·四部全零(專項查誌實)。 智顗《妙法蓮華經玄義》(T33n1716)、湛然《法華玄義釋籤》(T33n1717)、智顗《摩訶止觀》(T46n1911)、湛然《止觀輔行傳弘決》(T46n1912)四部,本帳以上開六串逐部獨立全掃,四部六串共二十四組全零命中〔查無〕。本帳誌此為負結果而非負命題:搜串已自品名二串放寬為六串(含四串非品名之義理串),仍零,據實記之;不以零命中斷言天台兩系於本品全無所承。

七、互讀與承衍

本品之義脈,前後相承者有五,皆此目所誌,不代定讀。

其一,前品〈六度相攝品第六十八〉之續(論主自證)。 論①開首即自誌所承:「須菩提聞菩薩摩訶薩大利根相,所謂一波羅蜜邊能生五波羅蜜,行一波羅蜜即能具五波羅蜜,如上品中說;」〔T25 0635c05〕——「上品」即前品,論主自言本品之問起於前品之義。慧影疏之科次第與此同向(第六目),是論、疏二家所判之承接相合。

其二,本論他品與他處之前指(論主自誌·六處)。 其一,論①釋菩薩旃陀羅,繫之於本論他品:「菩薩旃陀羅者,如〈魔品〉中說:」〔T25 0636b01〕;其二,論①釋般若在前導,引本論初品:「如《般若》初品中說:」〔T25 0636b28〕;其三,論①釋如、法性、實際三名之別,復指初品:「如、法性、實際差別義,如初品中說。」〔T25 0639b03〕;其四,論①釋合散,指本論破染之文:「如先破染、染者事中說。」〔T25 0638b20〕;其五,論①釋諸佛所念,指前文:「諸佛念義,如先說。」〔T25 0638c15〕;其六,論②釋字門,指陀羅尼之文:「善知字門者,如文字陀羅尼中說。」〔T25 0641a03〕。六處所指之本論前文,本帳未展開回核,據實誌其未展開,不以未核者充作已核。

其三,「有人言」體之三則異說(繫屬專誌)。 本品論段引異說者三則,本帳逐條誌其繫屬,以防誤作論主自說:其一,論①「復有人言:諸善法不得般若,不得至薩婆若;般若不得諸善法,獨能至薩婆若。」〔T25 0637a27〕——師子雷音佛國一段即繫於此則之下,非論主自立之義;其二,論②「有人言:觀可度眾生根有利鈍,具足者可度,不具足者未可度。」〔T25 0641a19〕——鳥子毛羽之喻繫於此則;其三,論②末之「復有人言」一則〔T25 0641c04〕,其所引之說作「先五眾有三種:善、不善、無記。戒眾等五,亦名為五眾。」〔T25 0641c04〕。三則皆敘事體引述,非『問曰/答曰』格式,不入頂層問答之數(第一目)。

其四,跨品 star 之零(本帳全掃之負結果)。 本品 star-corresp 重引條凡十一枚,其錨與其目標注皆落於本品範圍之內(逐條標明於第八目);本帳復以 corresp 屬性反向全掃全檔,未見錨落本品之外而目標指回本品之注者,亦未見本品之錨指向他品之注者——即本品於底本編碼層與前後品無 star 共注之痕。此與品四十三、四十四、四十七、五十六、六十一之兼有跨品 star 者不同型,如實誌錄為負結果,不強解其義理意義。

其五,後品〈三慧品第七十〉之接(並所釋經側之同名)。 本品訖於〔T25 0641c05〕,次品〈三慧品第七十〉起〔T25 0641c06〕;所釋經 T223 側次品亦作「三慧品第七十」〔T08 0373a09〕,經論兩側品名相同,與本品之品名兩造反向者不同,本帳誌其存在以明本品尾界之所止,不於此展開。另誌:【石】本於本品末別出一記,其校勘條底本原樣作「說【大】|說釋六十八品竟【石】」〔T25 0641c05〕,「第六十八品」即底本之品六十九(負一階),是石本自證其所釋至本品而竟。

八、校本與版本說明

本品底本為《大智度論》卷八十二至八十三〔T25 0632b14–0641c06〕(品身正文自品題〔T25 0632b14〕起,之上訖經①末〔T25 0635c04〕,之中自【論】標記〔T25 0635c05〕起訖卷八十二末題〔T25 0639b30〕,之下自續題〔T25 0639c03〕起,終於「緣,先略說,後廣說」〔T25 0641c05〕,次品〈三慧品第七十〉起〔T25 0641c06〕)。工作底本之校記清單依 CBETA 校勘條之本讀/各本異讀傳錄,正文從本讀。

witness 層(七造·負結果專誌)。 本帳獨立掃本品範圍全部校勘條之 wit 屬性,所見證本凡七造,逐造報實數:【大】一百九十見(其中一百八十九條為 lem,另一條於 CBETA 校改處退居 rdg)、【宮】八十四見、【聖】七十五見、【宋】七十一見、【元】六十六見、【明】六十六見、【石】六十四見;另 CBETA 校改層【CB】一見、【麗-CB】一見。本品無【麗】【磧】【南藏】等其他證本之獨立見數——非漏掃,是本品範圍內確無,如實誌為負結果。又:宮本之見數(八十四)居六異本之首,與品六十一之聖本居首、品五十六之宋本居首皆不同,為本品之實況,不強求與前品一致。

star 條十一(全落品內·無跨品·專列誌型)。 本品 star-corresp 重引條(同一異讀於文中重複出現共用一注)之全帳,本帳以 corresp 屬性獨立全掃:十一條之錨皆落於本品範圍內(隨條標明於下表),其目標分屬十注——0632013〔T25 0632c10〕『凌/浚/陵』二重(錨在〔T25 0632c12〕與〔T25 0636a16〕,是本品唯一之一注三錨者)、0633015〔T25 0633c04〕一重、0634012〔T25 0634c06〕一重、0635011〔T25 0635c09〕一重、0636005〔T25 0636a26〕一重、0636008〔T25 0636b12〕一重、0639009〔T25 0639a25〕一重、0640003〔T25 0640a29〕一重、0640006〔T25 0640b27〕一重、0641008〔T25 0641b19〕一重。跨品 star 零(見第七目其四)。

巢狀校勘條一例(專列·與品六十一之零巢狀不同型)。 本帳獨立掃本品範圍校勘條之巢狀結構,檢出一例:〔T25 0633b27〕之【宮】本大段脫文條(其 lem 為一長段經文,底本於該條標其字數為一百六十九,起於須菩提問般若何以最上最妙之句,止於「云何不取色,乃至不取阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?」一句),其 lem 之內另含二條校勘條:一為注 0633013「以【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】」(其錨另見於下表〔T25 0633b28〕),一為一 star 條(corresp 指注 0633015)。即大段脫文之校記與其段內逐字異讀之校記並存而相套,屬底本校勘層之結構實況,如實誌錄不強解。

一注多錨三例(專列)。 本品另有三條校勘條之注號帶字母後綴,為同一注覆蓋文中數段之故:0633012分 a、b、c 三錨(〔T25 0633b27〕二錨、〔T25 0633c09〕一錨,皆【宮】本之脫文),0634003分 a、b 二錨(皆〔T25 0634a13〕,【聖】本之脫文),0635005分 a、b 二錨(〔T25 0635a11〕與〔T25 0635a12〕,【聖】本之脫文)。此七錨皆各自列為一條,見下表。

注層與校勘條層之對盤(存目注零·傍註零·皆負結果)。 本帳以 note 之 n 屬性對校勘條之起錨獨立對盤:本品範圍內 type="mod" 之注凡一百七十八條,校勘條凡一百九十條,其差十二=star 十一條(共用他注)+CBETA 校改條一條(0639c1901,無 mod 注)。逐條對盤之結果:一百七十八條 mod 注無一條無對應校勘條——即本品無『有注而無條』之存目注,與品六十一之三條存目注不同型,如實誌為負結果。又本品範圍內 type="rest" 之傍註零條〔查無〕,與品六十一之二條不同型。

CBETA 校改條一例(專列)。 〔T25 0639c19〕一條為 CBETA lem-type 校改:其 lem 之 wit 為【CB】【麗-CB】,作「時」,而【大】本之「事」退居 rdg;lem 之內另附交叉引用二條,底本原樣作「(K14n0549_p1325c18)(T08n0223_p0372a19)」——前者指高麗藏本,後者指所釋經 T223 之對應處。此為本品唯一之 CBETA 校改,亦是【大】本唯一不居 lem 之處,故 witness 層【大】之一百九十見中有一見為 rdg(見上)。

書號與書名對照(逐字取自各檔底本 <title level="m">)。 T25n1509《大智度論》(底本);T08n0223《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》(所釋經);X24n0451《大品經義疏》(吉藏);X46n0791《大智度論疏》(慧影);X46n0784《大乘四論玄義》(均正);T33n1716《妙法蓮華經玄義》(智顗);T33n1717《法華玄義釋籤》(湛然);T46n1911《摩訶止觀》(智顗);T46n1912《止觀輔行傳弘決》(湛然)。本表每一書名皆本帳自該檔底本 <title level="m"> 逐字重取,非沿用他帳轉抄。 續藏三檔之 loc 一律取 ed="X" 之 lb(X24n0451、X46n0791 之 R 重印 lb 不採),與 T 藏 loc 不混。

校勘總帳(一百九十條全量對帳·原樣傳錄)。 下依工作底本原樣傳錄——本品校記合計一百九十條,與工作底本機械重計值一百九十相合;本帳復自底本 XML 逐條獨立重建校勘條之錨、lem、rdg 與 witness sigla,按底本出現序渲染為下表,與工作底本清單逐字對盤,一百九十條全同、零錯位、零字差。校勘條依原書出現序全量列之,內含 star-corresp 重引十一條(隨條標明目標注號與目標 loc);品題、卷題攸關之數處隨條記之。異本讀法並列保存,正文仍從現行底本讀法:

app 條(一百九十·底本出現序·star-corresp 隨條標明)

  • 〔T25 0632b14〕大智度論釋大方便品第六十九(卷八十二)【大】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九品上【宋】|大智度論卷第八十二釋方便品第六十九品上【宮】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九上【元】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九之上經作大方便品【明】|大智度經論卷第八十二釋第六十八品上【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第六十八方便品卷八十二【石】
  • 〔T25 0632b19〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0632c07〕須菩提【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0632c10〕凌【大】|浚【宋】【宮】|陵【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0632c12〕凌【大】|浚【宋】【宮】|陵【元】【明】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0632013)=〔T25 0632c10〕)
  • 〔T25 0632c17〕隨【大】|隨順【石】
  • 〔T25 0632c17〕朝侍【大】|侍朝【聖】|朝【石】
  • 〔T25 0632c19〕河【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0632c29〕輪【大】|三【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0633a02〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633a20〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633a21〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633a24〕心【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633a26〕思惟【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633a29〕故【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633b02〕得【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633b11〕身【大】|鳥【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0633b18〕微【大】|最【石】
  • 〔T25 0633b20〕法【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633b26〕寶【大】|實【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633b27〕是,於五波羅蜜中第一、最上、最妙【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633b27〕須菩提白佛言:「世尊!佛以何意故說般若波羅蜜最上、最妙?」佛告須菩提:「是般若波羅蜜取一切善法到薩婆若中,住不住故。」須菩提白佛言:「世尊!般若波羅蜜有法可取、可捨不?」佛言:「不也!須菩提!般若波羅蜜無法可取、無法可捨。何以故?一切法不可取、不可捨故。」「世尊!般若波羅蜜於何等法不取不捨?」佛言:「般若波羅蜜於色不取不捨,於受想行識乃至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提不取不捨。」「世尊!云何不取色,乃至不取阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?」【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633b28〕以【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633b29〕是【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0633c04〕可【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633c04〕可【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0633015)=〔T25 0633c04〕)
  • 〔T25 0633c09〕佛言:「若菩薩不念色,乃至不念阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,是名不取色,【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634a12〕者【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634a12〕則不能生檀波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634a13〕不能生大悲【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634a13〕菩薩若復作是念:『諸佛知諸法【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634a16〕詔【大】|照【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0634a16〕佛【大】|諸佛【石】
  • 〔T25 0634a21〕無所【大】|不可【石】
  • 〔T25 0634a25〕耶【大】|取【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634a25〕遠離檀波羅蜜耶?乃至【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634a26〕遠離一切種智【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634b17〕種【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634b20〕如【大】|如如【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634c06〕應【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634c07〕乃至【大】|及【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】|乃【石】
  • 〔T25 0634c15〕應【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0634012)=〔T25 0634c06〕)
  • 〔T25 0634c22〕所【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634c23〕菴【大】|掩【石】
  • 〔T25 0634c24〕羅【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634c29〕死【大】|死以【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0634c29〕如是行,當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0635a01〕人【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0635a04〕耶【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635a09〕諸【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635a10〕道【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635a11〕波羅蜜乃至一切種智【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0635a12〕須菩提!譬如射師,執【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0635b11〕相【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635b17〕知【大】|智【聖】
  • 〔T25 0635b20〕性【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0635c04〕廣【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635c05〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0635c09〕已【大】|以【石】
  • 〔T25 0635c11〕已【大】|以【石】(star·corresp→note(0635011)=〔T25 0635c09〕)
  • 〔T25 0635c15〕數【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635c22〕言【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635c25〕已【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635c29〕以【大】|與【石】
  • 〔T25 0636a02〕令【大】|合【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636a14〕得【大】|復【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636a16〕凌【大】|浚【宋】【宮】|陵【元】【明】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0632013)=〔T25 0632c10〕)
  • 〔T25 0636a21〕行【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636a22〕至,乃【大】|乃至【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636a26〕仗【大】|杖【石】
  • 〔T25 0636a27〕仗【大】|杖【石】(star·corresp→note(0636005)=〔T25 0636a26〕)
  • 〔T25 0636b01〕者【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0636b02〕受【大】|授【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0636b12〕波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0636b14〕波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0636008)=〔T25 0636b12〕)
  • 〔T25 0636b16〕波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0636b17〕般若【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0636b19〕各【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636b23〕導【大】|道【石】
  • 〔T25 0636b28〕前【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636c15〕指【大】|相【宮】
  • 〔T25 0636c16〕厭【大】|能勝【石】
  • 〔T25 0636c20〕當【大】|尚【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636c21〕能【大】|得【石】
  • 〔T25 0636c27〕般若【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637a03〕言【大】|言大【宋】【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0637a05〕塗【大】|徒【石】
  • 〔T25 0637a14〕是【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637a15〕而最上、最妙【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637a16〕玉【大】|王【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637a21〕切【大】|切法【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637a23〕悲【大】|大悲【石】
  • 〔T25 0637b06〕事【大】|處【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637b08〕波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637b18〕著【大】|若【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0637b21〕著,不著則不生【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637b25〕念【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637b27〕著故【大】|故著【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637c10〕便【大】|更【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637c20〕相【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637c21〕相【大】|根【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637c24〕語【大】|諸【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637c24〕人說【大】|說人【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637c25〕教詔【大】|演說【石】
  • 〔T25 0637c28〕諸【大】|戲論【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637c28〕佛【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a02〕是【大】|有【聖】
  • 〔T25 0638a05〕著【大】|者【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a07〕息:「如【大】|自如【聖】|息而【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a07〕必【大】|畢竟【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a10〕無所得【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a11〕等【大】|等釋曰【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a11〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a12〕是【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a13〕著【大】|若【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a13〕相【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a16〕破【大】|故【聖】|誰【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a23〕至【大】|是【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a24〕無【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0638a25〕亦【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638b07〕廣【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0638b17〕若【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638b28〕樹【大】|子【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0638b28〕菓【大】|樹【石】
  • 〔T25 0638c02〕時至【大】|至時【石】
  • 〔T25 0638c15〕人【大】|又【聖】
  • 〔T25 0638c19〕瘡【大】|鎗【宋】【元】【明】|創【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0638c22〕何【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0638c25〕亦【大】|多【聖】
  • 〔T25 0638c26〕夫【大】|人【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638c29〕學【大】|得【石】
  • 〔T25 0639a04〕三【大】|二【石】
  • 〔T25 0639a09〕聚【大】|眾【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0639a11〕知【大】|智【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639a13〕識【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639a19〕故【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0639a20〕知。先【大】|先知【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0639a23〕先【大】|失【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639a24〕知【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639a25〕妨【大】|防【石】
  • 〔T25 0639a26〕明【大】|眼【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639a28〕相【大】|相相【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639b09〕妨【大】|防【石】(star·corresp→note(0639009)=〔T25 0639a25〕)
  • 〔T25 0639b10〕相【大】|量【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b10〕量【大】|相【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b13〕法【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639b17〕節【大】|櫛【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b21〕多【大】|是【宮】
  • 〔T25 0639b22〕不【大】|〔-〕【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b26〕法【大】|性【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639b29〕聞【大】|門【宋】【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b30〕論【大】|經【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b30〕二【大】|二釋第六十九品上【宋】【元】【宮】|二釋第六十八品上【石】
  • 〔T25 0639c03〕大智度論釋大方便品第六十九之餘(卷八十三)【大】|大智度論卷八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品【宋】|大智度論卷第八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品【宮】|大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九下訖第七十品上【元】|大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九之下【明】|大智度經論卷第八十釋第六十品下訖第六十九品上【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品六十八卷八十三【石】
  • 〔T25 0639c08〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639c08〕所【大】|能【石】
  • 〔T25 0639c11〕進【大】|進喜【石】
  • 〔T25 0639c14〕學【大】|學如禪波羅蜜所說當學【石】
  • 〔T25 0639c19〕時(K14n0549_p1325c18)(T08n0223_p0372a19)【CB】【麗-CB】|事【大】
  • 〔T25 0639c20〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0639c27〕婆【大】|波【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639c27〕若【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0640a07〕十方【大】|今十方【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0640a16〕生【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0640a29〕知【大】|於【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0640a29〕知【大】|於【宋】【宮】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0640003)=〔T25 0640a29〕)
  • 〔T25 0640a29〕善【大】|善善【聖】
  • 〔T25 0640b07〕諦【大】|四諦【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0640b27〕切【大】|切種種【宋】|切種【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0640b27〕切【大】|切種種【宋】|切種【元】【明】【石】(star·corresp→note(0640006)=〔T25 0640b27〕)
  • 〔T25 0640c01〕寶【大】|實【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0640c07〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0640c14〕如【大】|如是【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0640c18〕以【大】|亦【宮】
  • 〔T25 0640c21〕八【大】|餘【石】
  • 〔T25 0640c25〕五【大】|六【石】
  • 〔T25 0641a06〕涅槃【大】|但般【聖】
  • 〔T25 0641a22〕鳥【大】|烏【明】
  • 〔T25 0641b02〕量【大】|礙【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0641b07〕異【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0641b09〕寶【大】|實【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0641b18〕者【大】|名【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0641b18〕估【大】|賈【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0641b19〕駃【大】|快【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0641b20〕駃【大】|快【宋】【元】【明】(star·corresp→note(0641008)=〔T25 0641b19〕)
  • 〔T25 0641b23〕鴦崛【大】|鴦屈【宋】【宮】|央掘【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0641b24〕善【大】|好【石】
  • 〔T25 0641c01〕解說【大】|解脫【宮】|說【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0641c02〕以【大】|以故【石】
  • 〔T25 0641c05〕說【大】|說釋六十八品竟【石】

I. Structural Placement

Within the sequence in which the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa comments on the Larger Sūtra, this chapter belongs to the section of the Commentary on the Remaining Chapters, and it spans Fascicles 82 and 83. The chapter title 「大智度論釋大方便品第六十九」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Great Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth"〔T25 0632b14〕 stands at the head of Fascicle 82 (a title raised at the opening of the fascicle, of a different type from the chapter title of Chapter 61, which stands within a fascicle); below the title is the interlinear note 「卷八十二」 tr. "Fascicle Eighty-two", and on the following lines come the author's signature 「聖者龍樹造」 tr. "Composed by the noble Nāgārjuna"〔T25 0632b17〕 and the translator's signature 「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」 tr. "Translated by Kumārajīva, Tripiṭaka master of Kucha, in the Later Qin"〔T25 0632b18〕; the place where the preceding chapter, "The Six Perfections Contain One Another", the Sixty-eighth, ends is precisely the place where this chapter begins. At the fascicle-end title of Fascicle 82, 「大智度論卷第八十二」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-two"〔T25 0639b30〕, this chapter is not yet finished, and Fascicle 83 takes it up with the continuation title 「大智度論釋大方便品第六十九之餘」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Great Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth, continued"〔T25 0639c03〕, below which the author's and translator's signatures appear again. The wording of the two author's signatures differs: Fascicle 82 has 「聖者龍樹造」 tr. "Composed by the noble Nāgārjuna"〔T25 0632b17〕, while Fascicle 83 has 「聖者龍樹菩薩造」 tr. "Composed by the noble Bodhisattva Nāgārjuna"〔T25 0639c06〕, with the two characters 「菩薩」 tr. "bodhisattva" in addition; this apparatus has taken both places afresh from the base text character by character and records them as they are, without unifying them on the texts' behalf. The chapter ends at the close of the sentence 「緣,先略說,後廣說」 tr. "As for conditions, they are first spoken of briefly, and afterwards spoken of extensively"〔T25 0641c05〕, and the next chapter, "The Three Wisdoms", the Seventieth, begins〔T25 0641c06〕.

The whole chapter has thirteen thousand and five pure Chinese characters (the value of a mechanical recount · this apparatus takes it as the reference value of first priority); this apparatus divides it into three units, the First Part (Sūtra ① of Fascicle 82), the Middle Part (Treatise ① of Fascicle 82), and the Last Part (Sūtra ② and Treatise ② of the continuation of Fascicle 83), counted separately as four thousand six hundred and fifty-two, five thousand five hundred and thirty-five, and two thousand eight hundred and eighteen, whose sum, thirteen thousand and five, agrees exactly with the tool's value, with a difference of zero—not of the same type as the gap in counting, ‘structural lines do not enter the tool's count’, habitually seen in the apparatus of Chapters 38 to 61, because the three units of this chapter are a division with zero drift: the structural lines of the chapter title, the two signatures of author and translator, the fascicle-end title, and the continuation title all belong to their own units, and not a single line falls outside the units.

How the cutting points are taken: the base text's own fascicle boundary (the fascicle-end title of Fascicle 82〔T25 0639b30〕 / the continuation title of Fascicle 83〔T25 0639c03〕) is the cutting point of first priority; but the Fascicle 82 section alone has ten thousand one hundred and eighty-seven pure Chinese characters (four thousand six hundred and fifty-two plus five thousand five hundred and thirty-five), still above the threshold for division, and so within Fascicle 82 one goes down a further level and takes the point where the 【經】【論】 markers change〔T25 0635c05〕 as the second cutting point—this place is both the boundary between sūtra text and treatise explanation and a change in the type of speaker (the Buddha's speaking turns into the treatise-author's explanation), a structural boundary of the base text itself, not an arbitrary cut. Hence the three-unit pattern of ‘Fascicle 82 divided in two, Fascicle 83 standing alone’; the great disparity in character count between the fascicles (ten thousand one hundred and eighty-seven against two thousand eight hundred and eighteen, about three point six to one) is the actual state of this chapter, and is recorded as it is.

The structure is two sūtra sections and two treatise sections, alternating in one round: Sūtra ① begins〔T25 0632b19〕 (Fascicle 82), Treatise ① begins〔T25 0635c05〕 (Fascicle 82), Sūtra ② begins〔T25 0639c08〕 (after the continuation title of Fascicle 83), and Treatise ② begins〔T25 0640c07〕 (Fascicle 83). Both treatise sections open the treatise with 「釋曰:」 tr. "The explanation says:" (a different type from the two treatise sections of Chapter 61, which open the treatise directly with 「問曰:」 tr. "Question:"; recorded as it is, without forcing an explanation). The top-level questions and answers number nine groups in all, seven groups in the Middle Part and two groups in the Last Part—this apparatus has recounted 「問曰:」 tr. "Question:" and 「答曰:」 tr. "Answer:" character by character in the stream of Chinese characters of each of the two units separately: seven / seven in the Middle Part, two / two in the Last Part, the two numbers symmetrical with nothing missing. In addition there are three citations of divergent views in the form 「有人言」 tr. "someone says": one in Treatise ①〔T25 0637a27〕 (「復有人言」 tr. "someone further says"), and two in Treatise ②〔T25 0641a19〕 (「有人言」 tr. "someone says") and〔T25 0641c04〕 (「復有人言」 tr. "someone further says"); these cite divergent views in narrative style, not in the ‘Question / Answer’ format, and are not counted among the nine groups. In the Sūtra ① section the speakers alternate more than fifty times (Subhūti asks and the Buddha answers, back and forth), the section of the highest density of dialogue in the whole chapter; Sūtra ②, by contrast, stops after one question and one answer: its opening words, 「世尊!是門,利根菩薩摩訶薩所入」 tr. "World-Honored One! This gate is what the bodhisattva-mahāsattva of keen faculties enters"〔T25 0639c08〕, are Subhūti's (Treatise ② itself restates them as 「須菩提意:以四種門雖安隱,以甚深故,利根者乃得入」 tr. "Subhūti's meaning is: though the four kinds of gate are peaceful and secure, because they are very deep, only those of keen faculties can enter"〔T25 0640c07〕, and the Buddha's answer below it as 「無不入者。」 tr. "There is none who does not enter.", the attribution of speakers being marked by the treatise-author himself); from the Buddha's answer beginning at〔T25 0639c09〕 up to before the starting point of Treatise ②〔T25 0640c07〕 no further question is inserted, and this is the only one-directional long teaching section in the whole chapter.

II. Terms Examined

Skilful means · the great skilful means. Where the chapter title comes from, and the backbone of the whole chapter. This treatise's base text has 「大方便品」 tr. "The Great Skilful Means", while the four texts of the Song, Yuan, Palace, and Ming have 「方便品」 tr. "Skilful Means", and the side of the sūtra explained runs exactly the other way (see Section IV for details). Sūtra ① at its very opening frames its question with ‘accomplishing the power of skilful means’; what Subhūti asks is 「是菩薩摩訶薩如是方便力成就者,發意已來幾時」 tr. "This bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has thus accomplished the power of skilful means—how long is it since he aroused intent"〔T25 0632b19〕—he does not ask about the substance of skilful means, but first asks how long or short the time of skilful means has been, and this is the thrust of the meaning set up in this chapter. Treatise ①, explaining what 「方便」 tr. "skilful means" refers to, answers directly by listing the merits of the stage of fruition: 「方便者,所謂金色身、三十二相」 tr. "What is called skilful means is the golden-coloured body, the thirty-two marks"〔T25 0636c14〕, and so on down to the ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the eighteen unshared dharmas, the omniscience of all kinds, great kindness and great compassion, and it sums up their use as 「得如是力,假令妄語,人猶當信,何況實語」 tr. "having obtained such power, even if he were to speak falsely, people would still believe him, how much more when he speaks the truth"〔T25 0636c19〕—skilful means is not a clever scheme; it is being complete in the dharmas of the Buddha and thereafter being able to win the trust of beings. Treatise ② further fixes its boundary by 「不證」 tr. "not realising": 「方便名欲成辦其事,能具足因緣多少得所,於中不令有失」 tr. "Skilful means names wishing to accomplish a matter, being able to make the causes and conditions complete, in the right measure of more and less, and within it not letting there be any loss"〔T25 0641b15〕, and its place of proof is 「如菩薩雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著」 tr. "as the bodhisattva, though he practises emptiness, does not realise the limit of reality; though he practises merit, he also does not cling"〔T25 0641b17〕.

The three questions on accomplishing the power of skilful means. The three questions and three answers at the opening of Sūtra ①, which this apparatus records as the steps of this chapter: asked how long since the mind was aroused, he answers 「是菩薩摩訶薩能成就方便力者,發心已來無量億阿僧祇劫」 tr. "This bodhisattva-mahāsattva who is able to accomplish the power of skilful means has, since arousing the mind, passed immeasurable koṭi of asaṃkhyeya kalpas"〔T25 0632b21〕; asked how many buddhas he has made offerings to, he answers 「供養如恒河沙等諸佛」 tr. "he has made offerings to buddhas as many as the sands of the Ganges"〔T25 0632b24〕; asked what roots of goodness he has planted, he answers 「從初發意已來,於檀波羅蜜無不具足」 tr. "from the first arousing of intent onward, in dānapāramitā nothing that is not fulfilled"〔T25 0632b27〕. Treatise ① opens each of them up: of the long time since arousing the mind it says 「除大菩薩,於餘眾生無量億阿僧祇劫」 tr. "leaving aside the great bodhisattvas, and compared with the rest of beings, immeasurable koṭi of asaṃkhyeya kalpas"〔T25 0635c09〕; the one who aroused the mind long ago and yet has not seen the Buddha is explained by 「大罪因緣覆心故不見佛」 tr. "because the causes and conditions of great sin have covered his mind, he does not see the Buddha"〔T25 0635c11〕; and for planting roots of goodness it sets a boundary—「若以深心行六波羅蜜,為阿耨多羅三藐三菩提故作功德」 tr. "if one practises the six perfections with a deep mind and makes merit for the sake of anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi"〔T25 0635c17〕—this is called ‘planting roots of goodness’.

The name of pāramitā. The pivotal phrase of the first half of this chapter. Sūtra ① sets the pattern: the five perfections, 「若離般若波羅蜜,不得波羅蜜名字」 tr. "if they are apart from prajñāpāramitā, do not obtain the name of pāramitā"〔T25 0632c08〕, and conversely 「因般若波羅蜜,五波羅蜜得波羅蜜名字」 tr. "because of prajñāpāramitā, the five perfections obtain the name of pāramitā"〔T25 0633b10〕. Treatise ① sets out the reason: 「菩薩雖行五波羅蜜,不得般若波羅蜜,不得名波羅蜜,以不破著心故」 tr. "Though the bodhisattva practises the five perfections, if he does not obtain prajñāpāramitā they do not obtain the name of pāramitā, because the clinging mind is not broken"〔T25 0636a13〕; it further judges that the five perfections that have not entered prajñā are 「但名為行善法,有量有盡故」 tr. "only called one who practises wholesome dharmas, because they are measured and have an end". Therefore the 「名字」 tr. "name" of this chapter is not an empty name; it is the boundary between the measured and the immeasurable.

Sarvajñā · another name for prajñā. Treatise ① sets itself a question: the five perfections are like the many streams, and prajñā should be like the great sea; why then does the sūtra say that the five perfections are protected by prajñā and enter sarvajñā? The answer says: 「薩婆若即是般若異名」 tr. "sarvajñā is another name for prajñā"〔T25 0636b15〕; the merit of the five perfections, entering prajñā, at once obtains pure prajñā; because prajñā is pure one obtains the Buddha path, and its name is changed to sarvajñā. Therefore 「入薩婆若」 tr. "entering sarvajñā" is precisely 「入般若」 tr. "entering prajñā", and there is no separate thing that is entered.

Neither taking nor giving up · not thinking · not abiding. Sūtra ① speaks of the practising marks of prajñā by a threefold negation: prajñā, with regard to all dharmas, 「無法可取、無法可捨」 tr. "has no dharma that can be taken and no dharma that can be given up"〔T25 0633c03〕; not taking is precisely not thinking, 「以念故著欲界、色界、無色界,不念故無所著」 tr. "Because of thinking one clings to the desire realm, the form realm, and the formless realm; because of not thinking there is nothing one clings to."〔T25 0633c22〕; because of not thinking one does not abide, 「不著故不住」 tr. "because of not clinging one does not abide"〔T25 0633c28〕. Treatise ① explains its necessity by the likeness of cause and fruit: since the dharma that is practised is ultimately empty, the mind that practises should also have nothing to be attained and no place of abiding, 「因果相似故」 tr. "because cause and fruit are alike".

The three losings. The vital point of this chapter, which Sūtra ① itself lists and Treatise ① itself marks with a number. The first is clinging to ultimate emptiness: 「若如是取相,則遠離般若波羅蜜」 tr. "if he grasps at marks in this way, he is far from prajñāpāramitā"〔T25 0634a04〕, which Treatise ① judges thus: 「是菩薩以我心外著空、內著我,不如般若行,故言遠離般若」 tr. "this bodhisattva, with the mind of self, clings outwardly to emptiness and inwardly to the self, and does not practise as prajñā is practised; therefore it is said that he is far from prajñā"〔T25 0637c03〕. The second is clinging to being without nature and taking it for the obtaining of prajñā: 「上以著空故失,今以破空得般若,而著般若無性故失,失故不得受記」 tr. "above, he lost because he clung to emptiness; now, having broken emptiness and obtained prajñā, he loses because he clings to prajñā's being without nature; because he loses, he does not receive the prediction"〔T25 0637c05〕. The third is clinging to the path the Buddha practised: the bodhisattva thinks 「諸佛知諸法無受相故,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "the buddhas, because they knew that dharmas have no mark of receiving, obtained anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi" and discloses it to others, and this too is losing; the sūtra itself breaks it, saying 「佛於諸法無所知、無所得,亦無法可說」 tr. "the Buddha, with regard to dharmas, has nothing he knows and nothing he attains, and has no dharma that can be spoken"〔T25 0634a16〕. Treatise ① gathers them in, saying 「菩薩著畢竟空、著無性、著菩薩所行道,佛說三種皆失」 tr. "The bodhisattva clings to ultimate emptiness, clings to being without nature, clings to the path the bodhisattva practises; the Buddha says that all three kinds are losing"〔T25 0638a04〕. That by which one attains is likewise only one sentence: 「無所得故不貪貴佛、不輕賤餘人,於一切眾生其心平等」 tr. "because of nothing to be attained, he does not covet and prize the Buddha and does not slight and despise other people; towards all beings his mind is equal"〔T25 0638a10〕.

The brief and extensive marks · the four gates. The final phase of Sūtra ①. The Buddha answers the question ‘how does one know the brief and extensive marks of all dharmas’ with four dharmas: knowing the mark of suchness—「色如相,無生、無滅、無住異,是名色如相」 tr. "the mark of suchness of form is without arising, without ceasing, without abiding-and-changing; this is named the mark of suchness of form"〔T25 0635b11〕; knowing the limit of reality—「無際是名實際」 tr. "being without limit is called the limit of reality"〔T25 0635b16〕; knowing the nature of dharmas—「色性是名法性,是性無分、無非分」 tr. "the nature of form is called the nature of dharmas; this nature is without parts and without non-parts"〔T25 0635b19〕; knowing neither joined nor dispersed—「是諸法自性無,云何有合有散」 tr. "these dharmas are without self-nature—where would there be joining, where dispersing?"〔T25 0635b26〕. Treatise ① explains 「非際是實際」 tr. "the non-limit is the limit of reality"〔T25 0639b04〕 by saying 「無相可取,無定法可著」 tr. "there is no mark that can be taken, no fixed dharma that can be clung to", and explains 「無分、無非分」 tr. "without parts and without non-parts" by saying 「無分者,不可示此示彼,無分別、無相、無量」 tr. "what is called without parts is that one cannot point out this or point out that; it is without discrimination, signless, and immeasurable"〔T25 0639b07〕, while 「無非分」 tr. "without non-parts" is not clinging to this signless and immeasurable, so as to break the dharma of the mark of measure; it further judges that the reason the nature of dharmas is not seen lies in the two matters 「有相、有量為麁,無相、無量為細」 tr. "having marks and having measure is coarse; being signless and immeasurable is subtle", both of which obstruct. Treatise ① also sets itself the difficulty 「眼見二指有合散」 tr. "the eye sees two fingers joining and dispersing", and breaks it in three layers: the finger has no fixed dharma, a small part joining is not joining, and the finger and its parts are neither one nor different.

The brief gathering of prajñāpāramitā. Where the eye of the chapter lies. After the four gates Subhūti makes the concluding words himself: 「是名菩薩摩訶薩略攝般若波羅蜜」 tr. "this is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's brief gathering of prajñāpāramitā"〔T25 0635b29〕, and further judges how wide are those who train in it: 「初發意菩薩摩訶薩應學,乃至十地菩薩摩訶薩亦應學」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has first aroused intent should train, and so on up to the bodhisattva-mahāsattva of the ten grounds should also train"〔T25 0635c01〕. Treatise ① glosses by 「安隱道」 tr. "the path of peace and security" the reason everyone can train in it: 「略攝聞是安隱道故,一切菩薩所應學」 tr. "because the brief gathering, when heard, is the path of peace and security, it is what all bodhisattvas should train in"〔T25 0639b28〕. 「略攝」 tr. "brief gathering" does not mean summarising the essentials—Treatise ① says plainly that both the brief and the extensive marks are obtained by knowing the four dharmas of suchness, the nature of dharmas, the limit of reality, and neither joined nor dispersed; therefore 「略攝」 tr. "brief gathering" is gathering into the four gates, not leaving out the extensive.

This gate. The opening words of Fascicle 83 come on from the four gates: 「世尊!是門,利根菩薩摩訶薩所入」 tr. "World-Honored One! This gate is what the bodhisattva-mahāsattva of keen faculties enters"〔T25 0639c08〕. The Buddha does not allow him that limit: 「鈍根菩薩亦可入是門,中根菩薩、散心菩薩亦可入是門;是門無礙」 tr. "the bodhisattva of dull faculties can also enter this gate; the bodhisattva of middling faculties and the bodhisattva of scattered mind can also enter this gate; this gate is without obstruction"〔T25 0639c09〕; only 「懈怠、少精進、妄憶念、亂心者所不能入」 tr. "the lazy, those of little vigour, those of false recollection, and those of disordered mind cannot enter it"〔T25 0639c11〕. Treatise ② explains its eight dharmas by the eightfold noble path: 「不懈怠者是正精進,不妄念者是正念,不亂心者是正定」 tr. "not being lazy is right vigour, not recollecting falsely is right mindfulness, not having a disordered mind is right concentration"〔T25 0640c12〕, the four gates of suchness and the rest are right view, and right view and the rest abiding securely is the practice of the precepts; it further judges the difference between the two persons—「須菩提小乘智短故」 tr. "Because Subhūti's knowledge, being of the Small Vehicle, is short."〔T25 0640c15〕 he says only that those of keen faculties can enter, and 「佛大乘大智故」 tr. "because the Buddha is of the Great Vehicle and of great knowledge"〔T25 0640c16〕 he says that those of middling and dull faculties too, with the eight dharmas coming together, can enter these four gates; as to why this is so, Treatise ② attributes it to compassion—「佛此中以大悲氣故說」 tr. "here the Buddha, because of the breath of great compassion, says"〔T25 0640c18〕 that those of middling and dull faculties can all obtain entry. The 「無礙」 tr. "without obstruction" of this chapter lies not in the dharma's being easy, but in the gate's not choosing people.

The items of knowing well. The long list at the end of Sūtra ②, which begins from 「當知是菩薩善知字門、善知非字門」 tr. "one should know that this bodhisattva knows well the gates of letters and knows well what are not gates of letters"〔T25 0640a27〕 and stops at 「善知分別三乘」 tr. "knows well how to distinguish the three vehicles", setting out item by item the bodhisattva's knowing. Treatise ② glosses them item by item and does not speak loosely: the gates of letters are 「如文字陀羅尼中說」 tr. "as is said in the dhāraṇī of letters"〔T25 0641a03〕; what are not gates of letters are 「非字名如、法性、實際,此中無文字」 tr. "not-letters means suchness, the nature of dharmas, and the limit of reality: within these there are no letters"〔T25 0641a04〕; the reason for obtaining the two lies in merit—「集諸福德道故,善知字;破福德中顛倒故,善知無字」 tr. "because of the path of gathering merits, he knows letters well; because of breaking the inversion within merit, he knows non-letters well"〔T25 0641a07〕. Giving up the path is 「菩薩從一地至一地,捨下地不憂,得上地不貪」 tr. "the bodhisattva, going from one ground to another, gives up the lower ground without grief and obtains the higher ground without greed"〔T25 0641a13〕, and not giving up the path is abiding in this ground. The items of the stages of fruition are also glossed word by word: 「善知須陀洹者,人也;須陀洹道者,見諦道也」 tr. "knowing well the srota-āpanna speaks of the person; the path of the srota-āpanna is the path of seeing the truths"〔T25 0641a16〕, and the fruit is the sixteenth mind, the mental-factor dharmas, the precepts without outflows, and such dharmas.

The eleven wisdoms. After Sūtra ②'s 「善知諸根」 tr. "knows well the faculties" come the eleven items of wisdom (wisdom, swift wisdom, powerful wisdom, keen wisdom, emerging wisdom, penetrating wisdom, broad wisdom, deep wisdom, great wisdom, unequalled wisdom, jewel wisdom)〔T25 0640b28〕, and Treatise ② gives the meaning item by item: the general mark is called wisdom; 「疾慧者,速知諸法」 tr. "swift wisdom is knowing dharmas quickly"〔T25 0641a23〕; what is swift but weak in strength is like a horse, and what has strength but is not keen is 「譬如鈍斧雖有大力,不能破物」 tr. "as a blunt axe, though it has great strength, cannot split things"〔T25 0641a25〕; 「出慧者,於種種難中能自拔出」 tr. "emerging wisdom is being able, amid various difficulties, to pull oneself out"〔T25 0641a26〕; 「達慧者,究盡通達」 tr. "penetrating wisdom is thoroughly penetrating to the end"〔T25 0641a27〕; broad wisdom is knowing without exception the scriptures, books, treatises, and discussions of both the path and the world; 「深慧者,觀一切法無量、無相、不可思議」 tr. "deep wisdom is contemplating all dharmas as immeasurable, signless, and inconceivable"〔T25 0641b01〕; great wisdom is being complete in all the wisdoms above; 「無等慧者,於般若中不著般若」 tr. "unequalled wisdom is, within prajñā, not clinging to prajñā"〔T25 0641b06〕; 「寶慧者,如如意寶,自無定色,隨前物而變」 tr. "jewel wisdom is like the wish-fulfilling jewel, which has no fixed colour of its own but changes according to the thing before it"〔T25 0641b09〕. This apparatus has counted these eleven items back character by character against the original list of Sūtra ② and obtains eleven, not ten; Treatise ②'s glosses speak of the two items powerful and keen together, and below deep wisdom bring out separately a further sense, 「世間深智慧」 tr. "worldly deep wisdom", so that the number of items glossed and the number of items listed need not correspond one to one; recorded as it is.

III. Similes and Stories

The key similes of this chapter fall into four bundles: in Sūtra ①, the bundle of similes for prajñā guiding the five perfections (nine similes brought up in a row); in Sūtra ①, the bundle of similes for prajñā as highest and for training in prajñā (one colour at Sumeru, the jewel of the precious maiden, planting fruit, the great sea, the archer, the four kinds of troops, the good driver); in Treatise ①, the bundle explaining losing and attaining (the stalwart general, the general obtaining the renown, foul weeds among the grain, the brave warrior entering battle, the grown man laughing at his childhood, earth, water, wind, and space, the tree and its fruit); and in Treatise ②, the bundle explaining the capacities of faculties and the items of wisdom (the clear and cool pool, the blunt axe, the fledgling, the wish-fulfilling jewel, the merchant waiting for the company, the parents beating a child). The similes of the sūtra all serve to show the superiority of prajñā; the similes of the treatise all serve to guard against the practitioner's losing, and the two, matched with each other, are precisely the backbone of the two Chinese characters 「方便」 tr. "skilful means" of this chapter.

The nine similes (given by Sūtra ① itself · brought up in a row as one bundle). Beginning from 「譬如日月周行,照四天下,多有所益」 tr. "It is as the sun and moon go round, illuminating the four continents and greatly benefiting them"〔T25 0632c03〕, nine similes are brought up in a row to make clear the use of prajñā for the five perfections: the sun and moon illuminating the four continents; the wheel-jewel of the wheel-turning sage king; 「譬如無夫婦人,易為侵凌」 tr. "It is as a woman without a husband is easily encroached upon and abused"〔T25 0632c10〕, with the woman who has a husband being hard to encroach upon; the general fully equipped with armour and weapons; the lesser kings attending at court in due season; the many rivers and myriad streams all entering the Ganges; 「譬如人之右手,所作事便」 tr. "It is as a person's right hand, with which what is done is convenient"〔T25 0632c20〕, while doing things with the left hand is inconvenient; the many streams entering the sea and becoming one taste; and the four kinds of troops of the wheel-turning sage king with the wheel-jewel leading in front. Their conclusion lies in 「導五波羅蜜到薩婆若,常是中住,不過其處」 tr. "it guides the five perfections to reach sarvajñā, and constantly abides therein, not passing beyond its place"〔T25 0632c28〕. Treatise ① explains the similes one by one: the simile of the sun and moon takes the sense of the two breaths bringing things to completion, 「月是陰氣,日是陽氣,二氣和合故萬物成長」 tr. "the moon is the yin breath and the sun is the yang breath; because the two breaths come together, the myriad things grow"〔T25 0636a04〕, and though people have eyes, without the sun and moon they see nothing: 「眾生雖有世俗善根利智,不得般若波羅蜜照明,尚不得二乘」 tr. "though beings have worldly roots of goodness and keen knowledge, if they do not obtain the illumination of prajñāpāramitā, they cannot obtain even the two vehicles"〔T25 0636a10〕; the simile of the woman without a husband is restricted to the mind, 「若菩薩乃至能自以身命布施,若無般若,其心易破,如無夫之婦」 tr. "if a bodhisattva is able even to give his own body and life, yet has no prajñā, his mind is easily broken, like a wife without a husband"〔T25 0636a14〕; for the simile of the right hand Treatise ① changes the wording to 「譬如人之右手,自然穩便」 tr. "It is as a person's right hand, which is naturally steady and convenient"〔T25 0636b20〕; and the simile of the wheel-jewel leading in front is matched with the guide, 「如導師在前,餘伴隨逐,進止取捨,皆隨導師,不得自在」 tr. "as the guide is in front and the other companions follow him; advancing or halting, taking or leaving, all follow the guide and are not their own masters"〔T25 0636b23〕. Jizang counts this bundle as 「十譬」 tr. "ten similes"〔X24n0451 0320b01〕; his way of counting differs slightly in division and combination from the nine items listed in this apparatus; recorded side by side without judgement; see "VI. Divergent Readings of the Masters" for details.

The simile of the stalwart general and his weapons (Treatise ① changing the sūtra's simile of the general). Sūtra ① has the general with armour and weapons; Treatise ① has the stalwart general: 「譬如健將,善知戰法,器仗具足,不畏怨敵」 tr. "It is as a stalwart general who knows well the methods of battle and has his weapons complete does not fear enemies"〔T25 0636a25〕, and at once matches the terms of its simile itself—「健將即是菩薩,器仗是般若」 tr. "The stalwart general is precisely the bodhisattva; the weapons are prajñā."〔T25 0636a26〕. As to those who cannot ruin him, Treatise ① points them out one by one: those of overweening pride are those who 「未得聖道,意謂已得」 tr. "have not yet obtained the noble path, yet in their minds think they have already obtained it", the brahmin ascetics of the outsiders' paths, Māra's people, and so on up to the bodhisattva caṇḍāla (the marks of this person Treatise ① does not set up itself but ties to another chapter; see Section VII).

One colour at Sumeru · the jewel of the precious maiden (given by Sūtra ① · taken up by Treatise ①). The non-difference of the perfections Sūtra ① illustrates by bodies of colour reaching the mountain: 「譬如種種色身,到須彌山王邊,皆同一色」 tr. "It is as bodies of various colours, on reaching the side of Mount Sumeru, the king of mountains, all alike become one colour"〔T25 0633b11〕; Treatise ① takes it up and adds the safeguard of a question and answer—one may not, because of their being of one colour, say that the mountain is not enough to be called great: 「五波羅蜜未入般若時,有差別;既入般若,則無差別」 tr. "when the five perfections have not yet entered prajñā, there is difference; once they have entered prajñā, there is no difference"〔T25 0636c28〕. The highest place of prajñā is illustrated by the jewel of the precious maiden: Sūtra ① has the jewel of the precious maiden among the many women of Jambudvīpa as foremost, highest, and most wondrous, and Treatise ① condenses its wording into 「譬如玉女寶,於眾女中最為第一」 tr. "it is as the jewel of the precious maiden is, among all women, the foremost".

The simile of planting fruit (given by Sūtra ① · Treatise ① matching its four matters). Sūtra ① illustrates by seeds the training in and practice of the six perfections: 「譬如士夫欲食菴羅果、若波羅那婆果,當種其子」 tr. "It is as a man who wishes to eat the āmra fruit or the boluonapo fruit should plant its seed"〔T25 0634c23〕, water it and guard it in due season, and when the seasons come together he obtains the fruit to eat. Treatise ① matches them one by one: 「樹是般若波羅蜜,菓是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "the tree is prajñāpāramitā, and the fruit is anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi"〔T25 0638b28〕, the person is the practitioner, and the water is the five perfections—the four matters having been matched, one plants the seed of prajñā and waters it with the five perfections, and the fruit comes of itself in its season; this is the real sense of what the sūtra calls 「當種其子」 tr. "should plant its seed".

The archer's bow and arrows that are as he wishes (given by Sūtra ① · Treatise ① inferring what cannot ruin him). 「譬如射師,執如意弓箭,不畏怨敵」 tr. "It is as an archer, holding a bow and arrows that are as he wishes, does not fear hostile enemies"〔T25 0635a12〕: the bodhisattva who practises prajñā, and so on up to the omniscience of all kinds, cannot be ruined by Māra and the gods of Māra; Treatise ① pushes the thrust further, saying 「若菩薩能如是一切法中行自在般若,魔、若魔人所不能勝,何況增上慢及邪見人!」 tr. "If a bodhisattva is able thus to practise the prajñā of mastery in all dharmas, neither Māra nor Māra's men can overcome him, how much less people of overweening pride and people of wrong views!".

The general obtaining the renown · foul weeds among the grain · the brave warrior entering battle (three similes given by Treatise ① itself). Since the wholesome dharmas coming together can also break the afflictions, why is the credit given to prajñā alone? Treatise ① answers with military merit: 「雖諸善法和合能破煩惱、得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,而般若波羅蜜於中功力最大」 tr. "Though the wholesome dharmas, coming together, can break the afflictions and obtain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, yet among them the power and function of prajñāpāramitā are the greatest"〔T25 0637a25〕, 「譬如大軍摧敵,而主將得功名」 tr. "as when a great army crushes the enemy, yet the general obtains the renown for the merit"〔T25 0637a27〕. Why do roots of goodness not increase when one grasps at marks? 「雖有善根,以取相著心顛倒故不增長;譬如種穀,其苗雖好,穢草多故,不能增長」 tr. "Though there are roots of goodness, because of the inversion of the mind that grasps at marks and clings they do not increase; it is as when grain is planted: though its sprouts are good, because foul weeds are many they cannot increase"〔T25 0637b18〕. Why is the bodhisattva kept in mind by the buddhas? 「譬如勇士入陣,破賊而不被瘡,則為主所念」 tr. "It is as a brave warrior who enters battle, breaks the bandits, and receives no wound is kept in mind by his lord"〔T25 0638c18〕—breaking the bandits without receiving a wound matches precisely being complete in the six perfections without clinging to the six perfections.

Earth, water, wind, and space · the grown man laughing at his childhood (two similes given by Treatise ① itself). The sense of non-abiding Treatise ① illustrates by four layers each abiding on the next: 「如地住於水,水住於風,風住於空,空無所住」 tr. "as earth abides on water, water abides on wind, wind abides on space, and space abides on nothing"〔T25 0638b24〕; because from the first there is no place of abiding, all are wholly without abiding. That only after obtaining the real mark does one know that what the world clings to is all false and deceptive is illustrated by a person's growing up: 「譬如人年既長大,乃知小時所行皆愚癡可笑」 tr. "it is as when a person, having grown up, only then knows that what he did as a small child was all foolish and laughable"〔T25 0639a26〕—it is not that something else is obtained; it is that, having come out, one then knows it to be laughable.

The buddha-land of Lion's Thunder-Voice (cited by Treatise ① · the proof of a divergent view). After the sense ‘the wholesome dharmas without obtaining prajñā do not obtain arrival at sarvajñā’, Treatise ① brings out a separate view: the one of 「復有人言」 tr. "someone further says" holds that prajñā, without obtaining the wholesome dharmas, can by itself arrive at sarvajñā, and its proof cites the passage 「師子雷音佛國,寶樹莊嚴」 tr. "The buddha-land of the Buddha Lion's Thunder-Voice is adorned with jewelled trees"〔T25 0637b01〕—the people of that land, as soon as they are born, hear the trees give forth the Dharma-sound of ultimate emptiness, without arising and without ceasing, and so do not give rise to an evil mind and obtain the acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas; what merit of giving, upholding the precepts, and the rest is there? It further gives as examples mad people and drunk people who, hearing the four truths from the Buddha, at once obtained the path. This is the only proof from the buddha-land of another quarter in this chapter, and the treatise-author marks it with 「復有人言」 tr. "someone further says"; it is not his own statement; this apparatus records its attribution as it is (compare Section VII).

The clear and cool pool · the blunt axe · the fledgling · the wish-fulfilling jewel (four similes given by Treatise ② itself). That the four gates do not choose people Treatise ② illustrates by a pool in the time of heat: 「譬如熱時,清涼池,有目有足皆可入;雖近,不欲入者則不入」 tr. "It is as, in the time of heat, a clear and cool pool: all who have eyes and have feet can enter; though it is near, one who does not wish to enter does not enter"〔T25 0640c10〕—having eyes and having feet is precisely the eight dharmas; the one who does not wish to enter does not enter of himself; it is not that the gate bars anyone. The keenness and dullness of wisdom are illustrated by the horse and the axe: what is swift but weak in strength is like the horse, and what has strength but is not keen is 「譬如鈍斧雖有大力,不能破物」 tr. "as a blunt axe, though it has great strength, cannot split things"〔T25 0641a25〕. Whether the faculties are complete or not is illustrated by the fledgling: 「如鳥子自知毛羽具足,爾乃可飛」 tr. "as a fledgling knows for itself when its feathers are complete, and only then can fly"〔T25 0641a21〕—this simile is originally tied to the passage of 「有人言」 tr. "someone says" (see Section VII). Jewel wisdom is illustrated by the wish-fulfilling jewel: 「寶慧者,如如意寶,自無定色,隨前物而變」 tr. "jewel wisdom is like the wish-fulfilling jewel, which has no fixed colour of its own but changes according to the thing before it"〔T25 0641b09〕; prajñā too has no fixed mark of its own and moves according to dharmas.

The merchant waiting for the company · the parents beating a child · Aṅgulimāla (three matters at the end of Treatise ②). That the bodhisattva could swiftly enter nirvāṇa and does not enter, Treatise ② illustrates by a caravan waiting for people: 「如估客、大將雖乘駃馬能疾到所止,故待眾人」 tr. "as a merchant or a great general, though riding a swift horse he could swiftly arrive at the place where they stop, still waits for the others"〔T25 0641b18〕. The sense of the deep mind is made clear by a matter between parents and children: 「如父母撾子,外惡內善;如佛度鴦崛魔羅」 tr. "as when father and mother beat a child, they are harsh outside and good within; as when the Buddha delivered Aṅgulimāla"〔T25 0641b22〕—knowing that though the shallow mind is evil the deep mind is in fact good, one can deliver him. Treatise ② does not unfold the story of Aṅgulimāla; it only raises his name as proof; this apparatus records it as an example raised, not a narrative, and does not supply a retelling on its behalf.

IV. The Sūtra Passage Explained

The full ledger of the two lines of chapter names (the side of this treatise · the base text 「大方便品」 tr. "The Great Skilful Means" · the four texts of the Song, Yuan, Palace, and Ming 「方便品」 tr. "Skilful Means" · the Shōgozō and Ishiyama a step of -1). The collation note on the chapter title〔T25 0632b14〕 is one note with seven readings, which this apparatus records by taking the base text as it stands, character by character: 「大智度論釋大方便品第六十九(卷八十二)【大】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九品上【宋】|大智度論卷第八十二釋方便品第六十九品上【宮】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九上【元】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九之上經作大方便品【明】|大智度經論卷第八十二釋第六十八品上【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第六十八方便品卷八十二【石】」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Great Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth (Fascicle Eighty-two) (Taishō) | Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-two, Commentary on the Chapter on Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth, first part of the chapter (Song) | Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle the Eighty-second, Commentary on the Chapter on Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth, first part of the chapter (Palace) | Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-two, Commentary on the Chapter on Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth, first part (Yuan) | Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-two, Commentary on the Chapter on Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth, First Part; the sūtra has The Great Skilful Means (Ming) | Great Wisdom-Crossing Sūtra-Treatise, Fascicle the Eighty-second, Commentary on the Sixty-eighth Chapter, first part (Shōgozō) | Mahāprajñāpāramitā, Chapter the Sixty-eighth, the Chapter on Skilful Means, Fascicle Eighty-two (Ishiyama)". Four matters are seen together: first, the base text (Taishō) has 「大方便品」 tr. "The Great Skilful Means"; second, the treatise titles of the four texts of the Song, Yuan, Palace, and Ming all have 「方便品」 tr. "Skilful Means", without the character 「大」 tr. "great"; third, the 【明】 text notes of itself below the title 「經作大方便品」 tr. "the sūtra has ‘The Great Skilful Means’"—within one and the same text, the treatise title uses 「方便」 tr. "skilful means" while it reports of itself that the sūtra title uses 「大方便」 tr. "great skilful means", so that the text itself records how the two names belong to their separate sides; fourth, the two texts 【聖】【石】 have 「第六十八」 tr. "the sixty-eighth", one step fewer than the base text, continuing without a break the pattern ‘the Shōgozō and Ishiyama a step of -1’ that runs consistently through Chapters 44 to 61. The two lines are recorded side by side without judgement.

The two lines on the side of the sūtra explained, T223—running exactly opposite to this treatise (a new check by this apparatus). In the sūtra explained, the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, the proper title of this chapter reads simply 「方便品第六十九」 tr. "Chapter Sixty-nine, Skilful Means"〔T08 0368c07〕 (its chapter-title line has no book title 「摩訶般若波羅蜜經」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra" at its head, unlike the style of the neighbouring chapters). The collation note on its chapter name (note number 0368011) reads, in the base text as it stands, 「方便【大】,大方便【宋】【元】【明】【宮】,摩訶般若波羅蜜經方便【聖】」 tr. "Skilful Means (Taishō); Great Skilful Means (Song, Yuan, Ming, Palace); Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, Skilful Means (Shōgozō)", and the collation note on its chapter number (note number 0368012) reads 「六十九【大】,六十八【聖】」 tr. "sixty-nine (Taishō); sixty-eight (Shōgozō)"—that is: the base text (Taishō) on the side of the sūtra explained has 「方便」 tr. "skilful means", while the four texts of the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace on the contrary have 「大方便」 tr. "great skilful means"; the base text on the side of this treatise has 「大方便」 tr. "great skilful means", while the four texts of the Song, Yuan, Palace, and Ming on the contrary have 「方便」 tr. "skilful means". The two lines run exactly opposite between sūtra and treatise, of the same type as the opposite running of ‘Not Realising It in a Dream / the oath in a dream’ in Chapter 61. Moreover this treatise's 【明】 text reports of itself in an interlinear note 「經作大方便品」 tr. "the sūtra has ‘The Great Skilful Means’", agreeing exactly with the 【明】 text on the side of the sūtra explained, which has 「大方便」 tr. "great skilful means"; the two sides prove each other, without contradiction. The 【聖】 text on the sūtra side also has 「六十八」 tr. "sixty-eight", its step of -1 running through both sides, sūtra and treatise. The two lines are recorded side by side, without taking either as correct.

The actual state of the n attribute of the T223 mulu (this apparatus's rescan of the whole book · correcting a partial reading of the earlier apparatus). In the mulu encoding layer on the side of the sūtra explained, T223, the displayed text of the mulu corresponding to this chapter reads 「69 方便品」 tr. "69 Chapter on Skilful Means", and its n attribute is marked 「70」 tr. "seventy"〔T08 0368c07〕. This apparatus does not view it through a partial look at a few adjacent chapters; it has recalculated, entry by entry, over the ninety chapter-level mulu entries of the whole book of T223, the difference between n and the displayed chapter number: fifty entries have n equal to the chapter number plus one, forty entries have n equal to the chapter number, and in addition thirteen n values are shared by two chapters (duplicated). Hence the n attribute of the T223 mulu is an unevenness of the whole book, not a flaw of any one chapter; the n of this chapter, marked seventy, belongs to the majority type ‘plus one’, and within the stretch in which it lies (Chapters 65 to 67 and Chapters 69 to 71 all plus one) there is nothing abnormal. As for the duplicated n of sixty-eight, its two chapters are Chapter 67, "The Inexhaustible", and Chapter 68, "Containing the Five", both before this chapter, not a matter of this chapter. This apparatus records this as the actual state of the base text's encoding layer; it does not force an explanation of its cause, nor does it take it as a flaw in the content of this chapter's sūtra text.

The fascicle-end title of Fascicle 82 and the continuation title of Fascicle 83 (further proof of the step of -1). At the fascicle-end title of Fascicle 82, 「大智度論卷第八十二」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-two"〔T25 0639b30〕, there are two collation notes, which in the base text as it stands read 「論【大】|經【石】」 tr. "treatise (Taishō) | sūtra (Ishiyama)" and 「二【大】|二釋第六十九品上【宋】【元】【宮】|二釋第六十八品上【石】」 tr. "two (Taishō) | two, commentary on the sixty-ninth chapter, first part (Song, Yuan, Palace) | two, commentary on the sixty-eighth chapter, first part (Ishiyama)"—the 【石】 text once again has 「第六十八」 tr. "the sixty-eighth", its step of -1 consistent with the place of the chapter title. The collation note on the continuation title of Fascicle 83〔T25 0639c03〕 is one note with seven readings, which in the base text as it stands reads 「大智度論釋大方便品第六十九之餘(卷八十三)【大】|大智度論卷八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品【宋】|大智度論卷第八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品【宮】|大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九下訖第七十品上【元】|大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九之下【明】|大智度經論卷第八十釋第六十品下訖第六十九品上【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品六十八卷八十三【石】」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Great Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth, continued (Fascicle Eighty-three) (Taishō) | Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-three, commentary on the sixty-ninth chapter, last part, through the seventieth chapter, first part, the Chapter on Skilful Means (Song) | Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle the Eighty-third, commentary on the sixty-ninth chapter, last part, through the seventieth chapter, first part, the Chapter on Skilful Means (Palace) | Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-three, Commentary on the Chapter on Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth, last part, through the seventieth chapter, first part (Yuan) | Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-three, Commentary on the Chapter on Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth, Last Part (Ming) | Great Wisdom-Crossing Sūtra-Treatise, Fascicle the Eightieth, commentary on the sixtieth chapter, last part, through the sixty-ninth chapter, first part (Shōgozō) | Mahāprajñāpāramitā, Chapter Sixty-eight, Fascicle Eighty-three (Ishiyama)". Here the three texts 【宋】【宮】【元】 report of themselves that what this fascicle comments on runs 「訖第七十品上」 tr. "through the seventieth chapter, first part", that is, their Fascicle 83 also contains a section of the next chapter, "The Three Wisdoms", which differs from the base text's fascicle boundary; the 【聖】 text's range of divergence here is markedly greater than a simple step of -1—its fascicle order reads 「卷第八十」 tr. "Fascicle the Eightieth" (three fascicles fewer than the base text), and what it comments on reads 「第六十品下訖第六十九品上」 tr. "the sixtieth chapter, last part, through the sixty-ninth chapter, first part", not of the same construction as the base text's 「第六十九之餘」 tr. "the Sixty-ninth, continued". This apparatus records it without judging whether this results from a separate way of dividing fascicles in the Shōgozō's own transmission or from some further corruption or loss (the base-text bytes have been excerpted as they are; their interpretation belongs to the matter of the fascicle order of editions, not to the meaning of this chapter). The 【石】 text has 「摩訶般若波羅蜜品六十八卷八十三」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā, Chapter Sixty-eight, Fascicle Eighty-three", maintaining its consistent step of -1.

A full reading of the restated sūtra against its source (collation of the two sides · a control group of four strings · the actual numbers reported in both directions). The opening of Sūtra ① in this treatise and the chapter "Skilful Means" of the sūtra explained are nearly identical character by character. This apparatus set up a control group of four strings and scanned each fully and independently in the two files T25n1509 and T08n0223, in a stream of Chinese characters, reporting the actual numbers in both directions: 「五波羅蜜得波羅蜜名字」 tr. "the five perfections obtain the name of pāramitā": T25 once〔T25 0633b10〕 / T08 once〔T08 0369c03〕; 「無夫婦人」 tr. "a woman without a husband": T25 once〔T25 0632c10〕 / T08 once〔T08 0369a01〕—both strings occur only once in each of the two files, their alignment unique, and they can serve as anchors for reading this chapter's sūtra section against the sūtra explained. Two strings that are not unique are also recorded, to make clear the bounds of the control group: 「善知字門」 tr. "knows well the gates of letters": T25 twice (once in Sūtra ②, once in Treatise ②) / T08 once (the sūtra side has no treatise section, hence once); 「略攝般若波羅蜜」 tr. "the brief gathering of prajñāpāramitā": T25 four times / T08 three times. A negative proposition is not established by zero hits, and a positive proposition is not established by a count in one direction only; the actual numbers in both directions are reported as above.

The range of this chapter on the side of the sūtra explained, T223, and its number of collation notes. On the T223 side this chapter's range runs from〔T08 0368c07〕 (the chapter title) up to before〔T08 0373a09〕 (the mulu of the next chapter, "The Three Wisdoms", the Seventieth). This apparatus independently rescanned by the starting anchors of the T223 collation entries and obtained sixty-eight collation entries within this chapter's range, of which seven are star-corresp re-citation entries. Their full entry-by-entry ledger this apparatus has not expanded (only the mulu sequence of the ninety entries of the whole book and the two notes on the two lines of the chapter title have been checked character by character; see above); it records as it stands that it has not been expanded, to be checked further later, and does not fill the count with an estimate.

V. The Prajñā Eye

The eye of this chapter lies in carrying 「方便」 tr. "skilful means" from the sense of expedient cleverness through to the sense of ‘being complete and not taking’—being complete in the six perfections, one thereafter has power; not taking a single dharma, one thereafter has no loss; the two together are named the great skilful means. Its sense can be summed up in five layers.

First, the root of skilful means lies in long practice, not in cleverness. The three questions and three answers of Sūtra ① ask about how long, about offerings, and about roots of goodness, none of which is a matter of technique; they are answered with 「發心已來無量億阿僧祇劫」 tr. "since arousing the mind, immeasurable koṭi of asaṃkhyeya kalpas"〔T25 0632b21〕, 「供養如恒河沙等諸佛」 tr. "he has made offerings to buddhas as many as the sands of the Ganges"〔T25 0632b24〕, and 「從初發意已來,於檀波羅蜜無不具足」 tr. "from the first arousing of intent onward, in dānapāramitā nothing that is not fulfilled"〔T25 0632b27〕. Treatise ① further makes clear the reason by the bodhisattva's being 「希有」 tr. "rare": 「無始生死已來集諸惡法,菩薩心後來,而能用後來心,不隨先所集惡心,是為希有」 tr. "From beginningless birth and death onward evil dharmas have been accumulated; the bodhisattva-mind comes afterwards, and yet he is able to use the mind that came afterwards and not follow the evil mind accumulated before; this is rare"〔T25 0635c25〕—the mind that arises later is able to overcome the evil accumulated earlier; the power of skilful means lies here, not in ingenuity.

Second, the five perfections obtain their name only through prajñā. What the nine similes all return to is one sentence: 「若離般若波羅蜜,不得波羅蜜名字」 tr. "if they are apart from prajñāpāramitā, they do not obtain the name of pāramitā"〔T25 0632c08〕, and conversely 「因般若波羅蜜,五波羅蜜得波羅蜜名字」 tr. "because of prajñāpāramitā, the five perfections obtain the name of pāramitā"〔T25 0633b10〕. Treatise ① judges the reason: without obtaining prajñā, 「不得名波羅蜜,以不破著心故」 tr. "they do not obtain the name of pāramitā, because the clinging mind is not broken"〔T25 0636a14〕. Therefore the 「導」 tr. "guiding" of this chapter lies not in an order of before and after, but in the difference between breaking clinging and not breaking it—the wheel-jewel leads in front, and yet the wheel too does not leave its place; the sūtra itself says 「導五波羅蜜到薩婆若,常是中住,不過其處」 tr. "it guides the five perfections to reach sarvajñā, and constantly abides therein, not passing beyond its place"〔T25 0632c28〕.

Third, being empty of self-nature and practising the six perfections do not obstruct each other. Subhūti's difficulty is the most direct: 「世尊!若一切法自性空,云何菩薩摩訶薩行六波羅蜜當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "World-Honored One! If all dharmas are empty of self-nature, how will the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, practising the six perfections, obtain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi"〔T25 0633a09〕. The Buddha does not break his emptiness; instead, right within emptiness he sets up skilful means: when the bodhisattva practises the six perfections he has this thought, 「是世間心皆顛倒,我若不行方便力,不能度脫眾生生死」 tr. "The minds of this world are all inverted; if I do not practise the power of skilful means, I cannot deliver beings from birth and death"〔T25 0633a12〕, and thereupon he gives up things and thinks 「我無所捨」 tr. "I give up nothing", does not break the precepts, does not hate, is not lazy, is not distracted, does not depart from wisdom, and in each case 「能具足」 tr. "is able to fulfil" them. Treatise ① explains by the two words, worldly and highest meaning, their not obstructing each other: 「世人不可但為說諸法實相,聞則迷悶,生於疑悔」 tr. "to the people of the world one cannot speak only of the real mark of all dharmas; hearing it they are bewildered and give rise to doubt and regret"〔T25 0637a10〕, so 「是故以第一義為心,用世俗語言為說」 tr. "therefore he takes the highest meaning as his mind, and uses worldly language to speak"〔T25 0637a11〕. Emptiness is the mind, speaking is the words, and the two do not take from each other.

Fourth, three losings and one attaining: the losing always lies in clinging, not in the dharma clung to. Emptiness can be clung to, being without nature can be clung to, and the path the Buddha practised can also be clung to; therefore Treatise ① judges 「菩薩著畢竟空、著無性、著菩薩所行道,佛說三種皆失」 tr. "The bodhisattva clings to ultimate emptiness, clings to being without nature, clings to the path the bodhisattva practises; the Buddha says that all three kinds are losing"〔T25 0638a04〕. Among them the hardest to notice is the third—since what is clung to is what the Buddha knew, why is it losing? The sūtra itself answers it, saying 「佛於諸法無所知、無所得,亦無法可說」 tr. "the Buddha, with regard to dharmas, has nothing he knows and nothing he attains, and has no dharma that can be spoken"〔T25 0634a16〕; Treatise ① further shows that the place of attaining lies in equality: 「無所得故不貪貴佛、不輕賤餘人,於一切眾生其心平等」 tr. "because of nothing to be attained, he does not covet and prize the Buddha and does not slight and despise other people; towards all beings his mind is equal"〔T25 0638a10〕. Coveting and prizing the Buddha and slighting and despising other people are two faces of one and the same sickness; this is the most important sentence of this chapter in recording losing.

Fifth, the four gates gather briefly, and the gate does not choose people. Sūtra ① gathers the brief and extensive marks of all dharmas by the four dharmas of suchness, the limit of reality, the nature of dharmas, and neither joined nor dispersed, and Subhūti thereupon concludes, saying 「是名菩薩摩訶薩略攝般若波羅蜜」 tr. "this is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's brief gathering of prajñāpāramitā"〔T25 0635b29〕, and those who train in it are as wide as from the first arousing of intent to the ten grounds. Fascicle 83 takes this up and asks who enters this gate; the Buddha answers 「是門無礙」 tr. "this gate is without obstruction"〔T25 0639c10〕, and only the lazy and the disordered in mind do not enter. Treatise ② matches its eight dharmas with the eightfold noble path, and further judges the difference between the two persons itself: because the Small Vehicle's knowledge is short he says only that those of keen faculties can enter; the Buddha, because of great compassion, says that the middling and the dull all enter. Therefore 「略攝」 tr. "brief gathering" and 「無礙」 tr. "without obstruction" are two ways of speaking of one matter—because it is gathered into four gates, its dharma is brief; because it does not choose among the three faculties, its gate is without obstruction. As for the utmost of skilful means, Treatise ② gathers it in one sentence: 「如菩薩雖行空,不證實際;雖行福德,亦復不著」 tr. "as the bodhisattva, though he practises emptiness, does not realise the limit of reality; though he practises merit, he also does not cling"〔T25 0641b17〕—practising emptiness without realising it is precisely what this chapter calls the great skilful means.

VI. Divergent Readings of the Masters

The Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa has no tradition of a full commentary following its text throughout, and the ancient masters' citations and explanations are, as the facts stand, partial. For this chapter both of the ancient masters who read it again have a dedicated section: Jizang's commentary, which explains the sūtra explained, is complete for the whole section, while Huiying's commentary, which explains this treatise, covers the first half of this chapter and stops at the end of his book; Junzheng's book has no citation of this chapter, and the four books of the two Tiantai lines also have zero hits. Each is recorded master by master.

Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451) · complete coverage of the whole section of this chapter · together with two explanations standing side by side. His commentary following the text of the chapter "Skilful Means" of the sūtra explained begins〔X24n0451 0319c21〕 (the internal chapter title 「方便品第六十九」 tr. "Chapter Sixty-nine, Skilful Means", directly following the place where the commentary on Chapter 68, "Containing the Five", ends) and ends〔X24n0451 0321c20〕 (ending before the title of the next chapter, 「三慧品第七十」 tr. "Chapter Seventy, The Three Wisdoms"〔X24n0451 0321c21〕); the general table of contents at the head of the fascicle also has 「方便品第六十九」 tr. "Chapter Sixty-nine, Skilful Means"〔X24n0451 0195c07〕, the table of contents and the internal chapter title bearing the same name, without divergence; its chapter name follows the base text of the sūtra explained in having 「方便」 tr. "skilful means", not 「大方便」 tr. "great skilful means". At the very opening he fixes the place of 「方便」 tr. "skilful means" by another sūtra: 「法華明一乘為實,三是方便,故開方便門顯真實義。」 tr. "The Lotus makes clear that the One Vehicle is the real and the three are skilful means; therefore it opens the gate of skilful means and reveals the true and real meaning."〔X24n0451 0319c22〕; next he brings up the Śrīmālā's teaching of the One Vehicle and great skilful means, and then fixes the sense of this sūtra himself—「今經云方便者,照空為實,遊空不著,涉有無滯,運用善巧,故名方便也。」 tr. "What this sūtra calls skilful means is this: illuminating emptiness is the real; roaming in emptiness without clinging, crossing into existence without obstruction, applying good skill—therefore it is called skilful means."〔X24n0451 0320a04〕, and he judges for himself that its difference from the Lotus and the Śrīmālā lies in general and specific: 「今此中開一乘為二慧,故有實慧與方便也。」 tr. "Now here the One Vehicle is opened into the two wisdoms; therefore there are real wisdom and skilful means."〔X24n0451 0320a06〕. He divides this chapter into three: 「上明方便體及方便用竟,今第三歎釋方便勸學者修行。」 tr. "Above, the substance of skilful means and the use of skilful means have been made clear; now, third, skilful means is praised and explained, exhorting learners to cultivate and practise."〔X24n0451 0320a08〕, and the items of the three praises are 「第一明昔因久遠歎行方便人,第二歎方便妙用窮能善巧,第三歎行方便人得無邊功德。」 tr. "First, it makes clear the long-distant causes of the past, praising the person who practises skilful means; second, it praises the wondrous use of skilful means, exhaustive in its capacity and good in its skill; third, it praises the person who practises skilful means as obtaining boundless merit."〔X24n0451 0320a10〕. Of the similes brought up in a row in Sūtra ①, Jizang counts them thus: 「初有十譬。古解言:十譬兩三相著,皆是歎上無盡品中三事也。」 tr. "First there are ten similes. An old explanation says: the ten similes cling together in twos and threes, and all of them praise the three matters in the chapter ‘The Inexhaustible’ above."〔X24n0451 0320b01〕—his number, 「十譬」 tr. "ten similes", differs slightly in division and combination from the nine items listed in this apparatus; recorded side by side without judgement, and the assignment by the 「古解」 tr. "old explanation" (praising three matters of the preceding chapter) is another master's view cited by Jizang, not his own judgement; this apparatus records its attribution and does not reconcile them on his behalf. Jizang further says of himself that his explanation relies mostly on this treatise: 「依論,初日月喻菩薩,二慧答四生也。」 tr. "According to the treatise, the first, the sun and moon, is a simile for the bodhisattva; the two wisdoms answer to the four kinds of birth."〔X24n0451 0320b06〕, 「答:論云:薩婆若是般若異名」 tr. "Answer: the treatise says: sarvajñā is another name for prajñā"〔X24n0451 0320b10〕, 「論云:著佛道故失。」 tr. "The treatise says: because of clinging to the Buddha path, it is losing."〔X24n0451 0320c15〕—in all three places he marks plainly what he relies on. On the number of losings, Jizang makes it four while this treatise makes it three: Jizang sets out 「失中四失:」 tr. "Among the losings there are four losings:"〔X24n0451 0320c06〕, taking clinging to emptiness, clinging to the emptiness of emptiness, clinging to the bodhisattva path, and clinging to the Buddha path as four; this treatise's Treatise ①, by contrast, has 「三種皆失」 tr. "all three kinds are losing"〔T25 0638a06〕. The two numbers are recorded side by side without judgement: Jizang's four lists 「著空」 tr. "clinging to emptiness" and 「著空空」 tr. "clinging to the emptiness of emptiness" separately, while this treatise has its own division and combination within the first two losings; the two masters rely on the same sūtra text but analyse the items differently, and this apparatus does not reconcile them on their behalf. On the extensive and the brief, Jizang sets two explanations side by side and does not take one: 「一解云:八萬法藏為廣,一部為略,乃至一長行為廣,一偈為略也。」 tr. "One explanation says: the eighty thousand treasuries of the Dharma are the extensive, one text is the brief, and so on down to: one prose passage is the extensive, one verse is the brief."〔X24n0451 0321b07〕, 「二解云:略廣是總別義也。」 tr. "A second explanation says: brief and extensive have the sense of general and specific."〔X24n0451 0321b08〕—these two explanations correspond exactly to the two layers of teaching in this treatise's Treatise ① (Treatise ① first takes the eighty-four thousand heaps of Dharma as the extensive and the Smaller Sūtra as the brief, and then takes emptiness, the signless, and non-action as the brief and the various specific marks as the extensive); this apparatus records their correspondence and does not judge it to be a matter of inheritance. As for the glosses of the items of knowing well in Sūtra ②, Jizang and this treatise's Treatise ② agree in much, the most evident being the item of the stages of fruition: Jizang has 「須陀洹者,道人也。須陀洹道者,見諦道也。須陀洹果者,十六心心法及無漏戒等法是也。」 tr. "The srota-āpanna is a person of the path. The path of the srota-āpanna is the path of seeing the truths. The fruit of the srota-āpanna is the sixteen minds, the mental dharmas, the precepts without outflows, and such dharmas."〔X24n0451 0321c05〕, while this treatise's Treatise ② has 「善知須陀洹者,人也;須陀洹道者,見諦道也」 tr. "knowing well the srota-āpanna speaks of the person; the path of the srota-āpanna is the path of seeing the truths"〔T25 0641a16〕, the fruit being the sixteenth mind, the mental-factor dharmas, the precepts without outflows, and such dharmas—the two masters are nearly identical in word order and in the sense of their glosses, differing only slightly in fullness; again, for the item of unequalled wisdom, Jizang has 「於波若中亦不著般若,此釋妙絕無所為喻名無等慧」 tr. "Within prajñā he also does not cling to prajñā; this explanation is wondrous beyond all, with nothing that can serve as a simile for it, and it is named unequalled wisdom"〔X24n0451 0321c14〕, and this treatise has 「無等慧者,於般若中不著般若」 tr. "unequalled wisdom is, within prajñā, not clinging to prajñā"〔T25 0641b06〕. This apparatus records their agreement as it is, and does not judge which inherited from which. There are, further, two matters, one of names and one of attribution, in which the two masters differ; recorded side by side without judgement. First, the last item of the eleven wisdoms: Jizang has 「如如意寶能滿心願名為實慧」 tr. "Like the wish-fulfilling jewel, able to fulfil the wishes of the mind, it is named real wisdom"〔X24n0451 0321c15〕, while this treatise has 「寶慧者,如如意寶,自無定色,隨前物而變」 tr. "jewel wisdom is like the wish-fulfilling jewel, which has no fixed colour of its own but changes according to the thing before it"〔T25 0641b09〕—the simile of the wish-fulfilling jewel taken up is the same, but the name is in one case real wisdom and in the other jewel wisdom, a difference in the naming of the term; this apparatus records it without judgement and does not choose one on their behalf. Second, the attribution of the two items meaning and words: Jizang has 「得義法亦無礙為善知語,得辭及樂說故知義,具此四能說三乘」 tr. "Obtaining meaning and dharma likewise without obstruction is knowing well words; obtaining expression and delight in speaking, therefore he knows meaning; complete in these four, he can speak the three vehicles"〔X24n0451 0321c16〕, while this treatise has 「得義無礙、法無礙故,名善知義。辭無礙、樂說無礙故,名善知語。」 tr. "Because he obtains the unobstructed knowledge of meaning and the unobstructed knowledge of dharmas, it is named knowing well meaning. Because of the unobstructed knowledge of expression and the unobstructed knowledge of delight in speaking, it is named knowing well words."〔T25 0641b26〕—both masters assign the four unobstructed knowledges to the two items of meaning and words, but their attributions are exactly opposite: Jizang assigns the unobstructed knowledge of meaning and the unobstructed knowledge of dharmas to words, and the unobstructed knowledge of expression and the unobstructed knowledge of delight in speaking to meaning, while this treatise does the reverse. This is a difference of attribution, not a gap in fullness; this apparatus records them side by side as they are, and does not judge which is right.

Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791) · the commentary on this chapter is the last section of his whole work. The commentary on this chapter begins〔X46n0791 0916c15〕; its heading reads, in the base text as it stands, 「釋大方便品第六十九(不完)」 tr. "Commentary on the Chapter on the Great Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth (incomplete)"〔X46n0791 0916c15〕, and below the heading it notes directly 「釋第八十二卷論」 tr. "commentary on the treatise of Fascicle Eighty-two"; this is the very last heading in the whole book X46n0791; its commentary runs on continuously to〔X46n0791 0917b10〕, immediately below which is the fascicle-end title of Fascicle 24〔X46n0791 0917b12〕, and the whole book ends. The wording of the heading follows this treatise's base text in having 「大方便」 tr. "great skilful means", while the chapter number the commentary gives itself is the sixty-eighth: 「第六十八品者,名為方便品,即是方便門中第三品也。」 tr. "The sixty-eighth chapter is named the Skilful Means chapter; it is the third chapter within the gate of skilful means."〔X46n0791 0916c16〕—his number is always one less than the base text's, in the same direction as the step of -1 of the two texts 【聖】【石】 of the base text, the third independent documentary source for the step-of-minus-one reading seen in this chapter. His words on the order of sections say 「所以次六度相攝品後明此品者,上明菩薩於一度中而能具足諸波羅蜜,今明所以然者,由菩薩善巧方便故,所以如此,故次六度相攝品後明方便品。」 tr. "The reason this chapter is made clear after the chapter ‘The Six Perfections Contain One Another’ is that above it was made clear that the bodhisattva, within one perfection, is able to fulfil all the perfections; now it is made clear why this is so: it is because of the bodhisattva's skilful means that it is so; therefore after the chapter ‘The Six Perfections Contain One Another’ the chapter ‘Skilful Means’ is made clear."〔X46n0791 0916c17〕—he takes the preceding chapter's ‘in one perfection being complete in all the perfections’ as the question of why it is so, and takes this chapter's 「善巧方便」 tr. "good and skilful means" as its answer, in the same direction as the words with which this treatise's Treatise ① at its opening takes up the preceding chapter. He judges this chapter to have four parts: 「就此品中大有四分:第一就人辨方便,是故善吉問成就久近、供養佛多少、發心時節,菩薩即是方便之人,波若即是方便之法。」 tr. "Within this chapter there are broadly four parts. The first distinguishes skilful means with regard to the person; therefore Good Auspice asks how long ago it was accomplished, how many buddhas were given offerings, and at what time the mind was aroused; the bodhisattva is precisely the person of skilful means, prajñā is precisely the dharma of skilful means."〔X46n0791 0916c21〕, 「第二從譬如日月周行照四天下,明波若方便導成眾行。」 tr. "The second, from ‘it is as the sun and moon go round, illuminating the four continents’, makes clear that prajñā and skilful means guide the many practices to completion."〔X46n0791 0916c23〕, 「第三明脩因得果,名為因果方便。」 tr. "The third makes clear cultivating the cause and obtaining the fruit; it is called the skilful means of cause and fruit."〔X46n0791 0917a01〕, 「第四明菩薩善學波若雙照二諦,名為照達方便。有此四意。」 tr. "The fourth makes clear that the bodhisattva trains well in prajñā and illuminates both of the two truths; it is called the skilful means of illuminating penetration. There are these four intents."〔X46n0791 0917a01〕. He explains the simile of the sun and moon thus: 「明譬如日月周行陰陽、周行四域,多有所益。波若、方便二法亦爾。其猶日月,葢眾行也。」 tr. "It makes clear that, as the sun and moon go round through yin and yang, go round the four regions, and greatly benefit them, so the two dharmas of prajñā and skilful means are likewise. They are like the sun and moon, covering the many practices."〔X46n0791 0917a04〕; for the wheel-jewel he cites another sūtra as proof, 「若無輪寶者,但名似轉輪王,唯王一天下也。」 tr. "If he has no wheel-jewel, he is only called one resembling a wheel-turning king, ruling only one continent."〔X46n0791 0917a07〕; the passage of the buddha-land of Lion's Thunder-Voice cited in this treatise's Treatise ① Huiying also takes up, judging 「此國唯以智慧得佛,如諸天等雖有福德而不能至佛,」 tr. "In this land one obtains buddhahood only by wisdom, just as the gods and others, though they have merit, cannot reach buddhahood,"〔X46n0791 0917a16〕. The last two sections of his commentary explain the brief and the extensive: 「略相即是總相,廣相即是別相,大小兩乘盡有此總別二相也,」 tr. "The brief mark is precisely the general mark, the extensive mark is precisely the specific marks; both vehicles, the great and the small, all have these two marks, general and specific,"〔X46n0791 0917b04〕, 「云何菩薩摩訶薩知一切法略廣相已下,欲廣明之,故設此問也。」 tr. "From ‘how does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva know the brief and extensive marks of all dharmas’ onward: wishing to make it clear at length, he therefore sets out this question."〔X46n0791 0917b09〕. Hence Huiying's extant commentary covers this chapter only as far as the question on the 「略廣相」 tr. "brief and extensive marks" in Sūtra ①, and from Treatise ① onward, together with the continuation of Fascicle 83, there is no commentary—this is what the 「(不完)」 tr. "(incomplete)" noted in the CBETA heading actually refers to: the incompleteness of his book breaks off within this chapter, not at its head. This apparatus records this fact and does not infer from it that Huiying never commented on the rest (where there is no text to attest, there is no text to attest, and no judgement of a missing commentary is made). Recorded in addition: the general table of contents at the head of the X46n0791 fascicle also lists an item 「釋大方便品第六十九」 tr. "Commentary on the Chapter on the Great Skilful Means, the Sixty-ninth", agreeing with the internal heading; this apparatus's character-by-character citations are all tied to the internal heading, not to the general table of contents.

Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784) · zero hits (recorded as it is). The six strings 「大方便品」 tr. "The Great Skilful Means", 「方便品第六十九」 tr. "Chapter Sixty-nine, Skilful Means", 「略攝般若波羅蜜」 tr. "the brief gathering of prajñāpāramitā", 「五波羅蜜得波羅蜜名字」 tr. "the five perfections obtain the name of pāramitā", 「無夫婦人」 tr. "a woman without a husband", and 「善知字門」 tr. "knows well the gates of letters" were searched back over the whole file X46n0784 in a stream of Chinese characters, with zero hits for each string. This book is in the form of an outline of the doctrines of the Four Treatises school, not an explanation following the text chapter by chapter; the zero hits come from its genre, are not a defect, and are not used to infer in reverse that Junzheng has nothing to do with the sense of this chapter.

The two Tiantai lines · all four books zero (recorded as found by a dedicated check). For the four books—Zhiyi's Profound Meaning of the Lotus (T33n1716), Zhanran's Annotations on the Profound Meaning of the Lotus (T33n1717), Zhiyi's Great Calming and Contemplation (T46n1911), and Zhanran's Supporting Practice and Broad Resolution of Calming and Contemplation (T46n1912)—this apparatus fully scanned each book independently with the six strings listed above: four books, six strings, twenty-four combinations in all, all with zero hits〔not found〕. This apparatus records this as a negative result, not a negative proposition: the search strings have already been widened from the two strings of chapter names to six strings (including four strings of doctrinal sense that are not chapter names), and still zero, recorded as it is; zero hits are not used to assert that the two Tiantai lines inherit nothing at all from this chapter.

VII. Cross-reading and Further Resonances

In the lineage of meaning of this chapter there are five things that carry on from before and after, all recorded in this section, without fixing a reading on the reader's behalf.

First, the continuation of the preceding chapter, "The Six Perfections Contain One Another", the Sixty-eighth (proved by the treatise-author himself). Treatise ① at its very opening records for itself what it takes up: 「須菩提聞菩薩摩訶薩大利根相,所謂一波羅蜜邊能生五波羅蜜,行一波羅蜜即能具五波羅蜜,如上品中說;」 tr. "Subhūti heard of the marks of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's great keen faculties, namely that beside one perfection he can give rise to the five perfections, and that practising one perfection he can at once be complete in the five perfections, as is said in the chapter above;"〔T25 0635c05〕—「上品」 tr. "the chapter above" is the preceding chapter, and the treatise-author himself says that the question of this chapter arises from the sense of the preceding chapter. Huiying's commentary on the order of sections goes in the same direction (Section VI), so that the continuity judged by the two, treatise and commentary, agrees.

Second, pointers made by the treatise-author to other chapters and other places of this treatise (recorded by the treatise-author himself · six places). First, Treatise ①, explaining the bodhisattva caṇḍāla, ties it to another chapter of this treatise: 「菩薩旃陀羅者,如〈魔品〉中說:」 tr. "What is called the bodhisattva caṇḍāla is as is said in the ‘Māra’ chapter:"〔T25 0636b01〕; second, Treatise ①, explaining prajñā leading in front, cites the first chapter of this treatise: 「如《般若》初品中說:」 tr. "As is said in the first chapter of the Prajñā:"〔T25 0636b28〕; third, Treatise ①, explaining the difference among the three names suchness, the nature of dharmas, and the limit of reality, points again to the first chapter: 「如、法性、實際差別義,如初品中說。」 tr. "The sense of the difference among suchness, the nature of dharmas, and the limit of reality is as is said in the first chapter."〔T25 0639b03〕; fourth, Treatise ①, explaining joining and dispersing, points to this treatise's passage breaking the stained: 「如先破染、染者事中說。」 tr. "As is said earlier in the matter of breaking the stain and the one who is stained."〔T25 0638b20〕; fifth, Treatise ①, explaining being kept in mind by the buddhas, points to an earlier passage: 「諸佛念義,如先說。」 tr. "The sense of the buddhas' keeping in mind is as said earlier."〔T25 0638c15〕; sixth, Treatise ②, explaining the gates of letters, points to the passage on dhāraṇī: 「善知字門者,如文字陀羅尼中說。」 tr. "Knowing well the gates of letters is as is said in the dhāraṇī of letters."〔T25 0641a03〕. The earlier passages of this treatise pointed to in these six places this apparatus has not unfolded and checked back; it records as it stands that they have not been unfolded, and does not let what has not been checked stand for what has been checked.

Third, the three divergent views in the form 「有人言」 tr. "someone says" (a dedicated record of attribution). The treatise sections of this chapter cite divergent views three times, and this apparatus records the attribution of each, to guard against their being mistaken for the treatise-author's own statements: first, Treatise ①'s 「復有人言:諸善法不得般若,不得至薩婆若;般若不得諸善法,獨能至薩婆若。」 tr. "Someone further says: the wholesome dharmas, without obtaining prajñā, cannot reach sarvajñā; prajñā, without obtaining the wholesome dharmas, can reach sarvajñā by itself."〔T25 0637a27〕—the passage on the buddha-land of Lion's Thunder-Voice is tied below this one, and is not a sense set up by the treatise-author himself; second, Treatise ②'s 「有人言:觀可度眾生根有利鈍,具足者可度,不具足者未可度。」 tr. "Someone says: observing beings who can be delivered, their faculties are keen or dull; those whose faculties are complete can be delivered, those whose faculties are not complete cannot yet be delivered."〔T25 0641a19〕—the simile of the fledgling's feathers is tied to this one; third, the one of 「復有人言」 tr. "someone further says" at the end of Treatise ②〔T25 0641c04〕, whose cited view reads 「先五眾有三種:善、不善、無記。戒眾等五,亦名為五眾。」 tr. "The five aggregates earlier are of three kinds: wholesome, unwholesome, and indeterminate. The aggregate of morality and the other four are also named the five aggregates."〔T25 0641c04〕. All three are citations in narrative style, not in the ‘Question / Answer’ format, and do not enter the number of the top-level questions and answers (Section I).

Fourth, zero stars across chapters (a negative result of this apparatus's full scan). The star-corresp re-citation entries of this chapter number eleven in all, and both their anchors and their target notes all fall within the range of this chapter (marked entry by entry in Section VIII); this apparatus further did a full reverse scan of the whole file by the corresp attribute, and found no note whose anchor falls outside this chapter and whose target points back to this chapter, nor any anchor of this chapter pointing to a note of another chapter—that is, in the encoding layer of the base text this chapter has no trace of shared star notes with the chapters before and after it. This is of a different type from Chapters 43, 44, 47, 56, and 61, which do have stars across chapters; recorded as it is as a negative result, without forcing an explanation of its doctrinal significance.

Fifth, the junction with the next chapter, "The Three Wisdoms", the Seventieth (and the same name on the side of the sūtra explained). This chapter ends at〔T25 0641c05〕, and the next chapter, "The Three Wisdoms", the Seventieth, begins〔T25 0641c06〕; on the side of the sūtra explained, T223, the next chapter also reads 「三慧品第七十」 tr. "Chapter Seventy, The Three Wisdoms"〔T08 0373a09〕, the chapter names on the two sides, sūtra and treatise, being the same—unlike the opposite running of the two lines of this chapter's chapter name; this apparatus records its existence to make clear where this chapter's closing boundary stops, and does not unfold it here. Recorded in addition: the 【石】 text has a separate record at the end of this chapter, whose collation note reads in the base text as it stands 「說【大】|說釋六十八品竟【石】」 tr. "speaks (Taishō) | speaks; the commentary on the sixty-eighth chapter is finished (Ishiyama)"〔T25 0641c05〕; 「第六十八品」 tr. "the sixty-eighth chapter" is the base text's Chapter 69 (a step of -1), so that the Ishiyama text proves of itself that what it comments on comes to an end with this chapter.

VIII. Witnesses and Editions

The base text of this chapter is Fascicles 82 to 83 of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa〔T25 0632b14–0641c06〕 (the main text of the chapter body begins from the chapter title〔T25 0632b14〕; the First Part ends at the end of Sūtra ①〔T25 0635c04〕; the Middle Part begins from the 【論】 marker〔T25 0635c05〕 and ends at the fascicle-end title of Fascicle 82〔T25 0639b30〕; the Last Part begins from the continuation title〔T25 0639c03〕 and ends with 「緣,先略說,後廣說」 tr. "As for conditions, they are first spoken of briefly, and afterwards spoken of extensively"〔T25 0641c05〕; the next chapter, "The Three Wisdoms", the Seventieth, begins〔T25 0641c06〕). The list of collation notes of the working base text transmits the base reading and the variant readings of each text according to the CBETA collation entries, and the main text follows the base reading.

The witness layer (seven readings · a dedicated record of negative results). This apparatus independently scanned the wit attribute of all the collation entries within the range of this chapter; the witnesses seen number seven in all, and the actual number is reported for each: 【大】 seen one hundred and ninety times (of which one hundred and eighty-nine entries are lem, and one further entry falls back to rdg at the place of a CBETA emendation), 【宮】 eighty-four times, 【聖】 seventy-five times, 【宋】 seventy-one times, 【元】 sixty-six times, 【明】 sixty-six times, 【石】 sixty-four times; in addition, in the CBETA emendation layer, 【CB】 once and 【麗-CB】 once. This chapter has no independent count for other witnesses such as 【麗】【磧】【南藏】—not a gap in scanning; within the range of this chapter there truly are none, recorded as it is as a negative result. Further: the count of the Palace text (eighty-four) stands first among the six variant texts, unlike Chapter 61, where the Shōgozō text stands first, and Chapter 56, where the Song text stands first; this is the actual state of this chapter, and no agreement with the preceding chapters is forced.

Eleven star entries (all falling within the chapter · none across chapters · listed separately to record the type). The full ledger of this chapter's star-corresp re-citation entries (where the same variant reading recurs in the text and shares one note), which this apparatus independently scanned in full by the corresp attribute: the anchors of all eleven entries fall within the range of this chapter (marked with each entry in the table below), and their targets belong to ten notes—0632013〔T25 0632c10〕 ‘凌/浚/陵’, doubled (anchors at〔T25 0632c12〕 and〔T25 0636a16〕, the only note in this chapter with three anchors), 0633015〔T25 0633c04〕 single, 0634012〔T25 0634c06〕 single, 0635011〔T25 0635c09〕 single, 0636005〔T25 0636a26〕 single, 0636008〔T25 0636b12〕 single, 0639009〔T25 0639a25〕 single, 0640003〔T25 0640a29〕 single, 0640006〔T25 0640b27〕 single, 0641008〔T25 0641b19〕 single. Stars across chapters: zero (see Section VII, the fourth).

One case of a nested collation entry (listed separately · of a different type from the zero nesting of Chapter 61). This apparatus independently scanned the nesting structure of the collation entries within the range of this chapter and found one case: the entry at〔T25 0633b27〕 for the long omission in the 【宮】 text (its lem is a long passage of sūtra text, whose number of characters the base text marks in that entry as one hundred and sixty-nine; it begins with the sentence in which Subhūti asks why prajñā is highest and most wondrous, and ends with the sentence 「云何不取色,乃至不取阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?」 tr. "What is called not taking form, and so on up to not taking anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi?"), within whose lem there are two further collation entries: one is note 0633013 「以【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】」 tr. "by (Taishō) | omitted (Song, Yuan, Ming, Shōgozō)" (its anchor is also seen in the table below at〔T25 0633b28〕), and the other is a star entry (corresp pointing to note 0633015). That is, the collation note on the long omission and the collation notes on character-by-character variant readings within the passage stand together and enclose one another; this is the actual state of the structure of the base text's collation layer, recorded as it is without forcing an explanation.

Three cases of one note with several anchors (listed separately). In this chapter there are, in addition, three collation entries whose note numbers carry letter suffixes, because one note covers several passages in the text: 0633012 divides into three anchors, a, b, and c (two anchors at〔T25 0633b27〕, one anchor at〔T25 0633c09〕, all omissions of the 【宮】 text); 0634003 divides into two anchors, a and b (both at〔T25 0634a13〕, omissions of the 【聖】 text); 0635005 divides into two anchors, a and b (at〔T25 0635a11〕 and〔T25 0635a12〕, omissions of the 【聖】 text). These seven anchors are each listed as one entry; see the table below.

Reconciling the note layer with the collation-entry layer (catalogue-only notes zero · marginal notes zero · both negative results). This apparatus independently reconciled the n attributes of the notes against the starting anchors of the collation entries: within the range of this chapter the notes of type="mod" number one hundred and seventy-eight, and the collation entries one hundred and ninety; the difference of twelve = eleven star entries (sharing other notes) + one CBETA emendation entry (0639c1901, with no mod note). The result of the entry-by-entry reconciliation: of the one hundred and seventy-eight mod notes, not one lacks a corresponding collation entry—that is, this chapter has no catalogue-only note of the kind ‘a note but no entry’, unlike the three catalogue-only notes of Chapter 61; recorded as it is as a negative result. Further, within the range of this chapter the marginal notes of type="rest" number zero〔not found〕, unlike the two of Chapter 61.

One case of a CBETA emendation entry (listed separately). The entry at〔T25 0639c19〕 is a CBETA lem-type emendation: the wit of its lem is 【CB】【麗-CB】, reading 「時」 tr. "time", while the 【大】 text's 「事」 tr. "matter" falls back to rdg; within the lem two cross-references are attached, which in the base text as it stands read 「(K14n0549_p1325c18)(T08n0223_p0372a19)」 tr. "(the Korean Canon, K14, number 0549, page 1325, column c, line 18) (the sūtra explained, T08, number 0223, page 0372, column a, line 19)"—the former points to the Korean Canon text, the latter to the corresponding place in the sūtra explained, T223. This is the only CBETA emendation in this chapter, and also the only place where the 【大】 text does not stand as lem; hence, of the one hundred and ninety occurrences of 【大】 in the witness layer, one is rdg (see above).

Table of book numbers and book titles (taken character by character from the <title level="m"> of the base text of each file). T25n1509 Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa (the base text); T08n0223 Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra (the sūtra explained); X24n0451 Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (Jizang); X46n0791 Commentary (Huiying); X46n0784 Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (Junzheng); T33n1716 Profound Meaning of the Lotus (Zhiyi); T33n1717 Annotations on the Profound Meaning of the Lotus (Zhanran); T46n1911 Great Calming and Contemplation (Zhiyi); T46n1912 Supporting Practice and Broad Resolution of Calming and Contemplation (Zhanran). Every book title in this table this apparatus has taken afresh, character by character, from the <title level="m"> of the base text of that file, not copied over from another apparatus. The loci of the three files of the Supplement to the Canon are all taken from the lb of ed="X" (the lb of the R reprint of X24n0451 and X46n0791 is not adopted), and are not mixed with the loci of the Taishō Canon.

The general ledger of collation (a full ledger of one hundred and ninety entries · transmitted as they stand). Below, transmitted as it stands in the working base text—the collation notes of this chapter total one hundred and ninety entries, agreeing with the mechanical recount of the working base text, one hundred and ninety; this apparatus further rebuilt independently from the base-text XML, entry by entry, the anchor, lem, rdg, and witness sigla of each collation entry, rendered them into the table below in the order of their appearance in the base text, and reconciled them character by character with the list of the working base text: all one hundred and ninety entries identical, zero misplacement, zero difference of characters. The collation entries are listed in full in the order of the original book, including eleven star-corresp re-citation entries (the target note number and target locus marked with each entry); the several places bearing on the chapter title and fascicle titles are noted with their entries. The readings of the variant texts are preserved side by side, and the main text still follows the reading of the current base text:

App entries (one hundred and ninety · in order of appearance in the base text · star-corresp marked with each entry)

  • 〔T25 0632b14〕大智度論釋大方便品第六十九(卷八十二)【大】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九品上【宋】|大智度論卷第八十二釋方便品第六十九品上【宮】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九上【元】|大智度論卷八十二釋方便品第六十九之上經作大方便品【明】|大智度經論卷第八十二釋第六十八品上【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第六十八方便品卷八十二【石】
  • 〔T25 0632b19〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0632c07〕須菩提【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0632c10〕凌【大】|浚【宋】【宮】|陵【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0632c12〕凌【大】|浚【宋】【宮】|陵【元】【明】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0632013) = the note at〔T25 0632c10〕)
  • 〔T25 0632c17〕隨【大】|隨順【石】
  • 〔T25 0632c17〕朝侍【大】|侍朝【聖】|朝【石】
  • 〔T25 0632c19〕河【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0632c29〕輪【大】|三【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0633a02〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633a20〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633a21〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633a24〕心【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633a26〕思惟【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633a29〕故【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633b02〕得【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633b11〕身【大】|鳥【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0633b18〕微【大】|最【石】
  • 〔T25 0633b20〕法【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633b26〕寶【大】|實【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633b27〕是,於五波羅蜜中第一、最上、最妙【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633b27〕須菩提白佛言:「世尊!佛以何意故說般若波羅蜜最上、最妙?」 tr. "World-Honored One! With what intent does the Buddha say that prajñāpāramitā is highest and most wondrous?"佛告須菩提:「是般若波羅蜜取一切善法到薩婆若中,住不住故。」 tr. "This prajñāpāramitā takes all wholesome dharmas into sarvajñā, and this is because it takes abiding as not abiding."須菩提白佛言:「世尊!般若波羅蜜有法可取、可捨不?」 tr. "World-Honored One! Does prajñāpāramitā have any dharma that can be taken or can be given up?"佛言:「不也!須菩提!般若波羅蜜無法可取、無法可捨。何以故?一切法不可取、不可捨故。」 tr. "No, Subhūti! Prajñāpāramitā has no dharma that can be taken and no dharma that can be given up. Why? Because all dharmas cannot be taken and cannot be given up."「世尊!般若波羅蜜於何等法不取不捨?」 tr. "World-Honored One! With regard to what dharmas does prajñāpāramitā neither take nor give up?"佛言:「般若波羅蜜於色不取不捨,於受想行識乃至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提不取不捨。」 tr. "Prajñāpāramitā neither takes nor gives up form; it neither takes nor gives up feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, and so on up to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi."「世尊!云何不取色,乃至不取阿耨多羅三藐三菩提?」 tr. "World-Honored One! What is called not taking form, and so on up to not taking anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi?"【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0633b28〕以【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633b29〕是【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0633c04〕可【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0633c04〕可【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0633015) = the note at〔T25 0633c04〕)
  • 〔T25 0633c09〕佛言:「若菩薩不念色,乃至不念阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,是名不取色,【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634a12〕者【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634a12〕則不能生檀波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634a13〕不能生大悲【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634a13〕菩薩若復作是念:『諸佛知諸法【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634a16〕詔【大】|照【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0634a16〕佛【大】|諸佛【石】
  • 〔T25 0634a21〕無所【大】|不可【石】
  • 〔T25 0634a25〕耶【大】|取【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634a25〕遠離檀波羅蜜耶?乃至【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634a26〕遠離一切種智【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634b17〕種【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634b20〕如【大】|如如【聖】
  • 〔T25 0634c06〕應【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634c07〕乃至【大】|及【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】|乃【石】
  • 〔T25 0634c15〕應【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0634012) = the note at〔T25 0634c06〕)
  • 〔T25 0634c22〕所【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634c23〕菴【大】|掩【石】
  • 〔T25 0634c24〕羅【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0634c29〕死【大】|死以【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0634c29〕如是行,當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0635a01〕人【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0635a04〕耶【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635a09〕諸【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635a10〕道【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635a11〕波羅蜜乃至一切種智【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0635a12〕須菩提!譬如射師,執【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0635b11〕相【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635b17〕知【大】|智【聖】
  • 〔T25 0635b20〕性【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0635c04〕廣【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635c05〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0635c09〕已【大】|以【石】
  • 〔T25 0635c11〕已【大】|以【石】(star · corresp → note(0635011) = the note at〔T25 0635c09〕)
  • 〔T25 0635c15〕數【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635c22〕言【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635c25〕已【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0635c29〕以【大】|與【石】
  • 〔T25 0636a02〕令【大】|合【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636a14〕得【大】|復【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636a16〕凌【大】|浚【宋】【宮】|陵【元】【明】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0632013) = the note at〔T25 0632c10〕)
  • 〔T25 0636a21〕行【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636a22〕至,乃【大】|乃至【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636a26〕仗【大】|杖【石】
  • 〔T25 0636a27〕仗【大】|杖【石】(star · corresp → note(0636005) = the note at〔T25 0636a26〕)
  • 〔T25 0636b01〕者【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0636b02〕受【大】|授【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0636b12〕波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0636b14〕波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0636008) = the note at〔T25 0636b12〕)
  • 〔T25 0636b16〕波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0636b17〕般若【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0636b19〕各【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636b23〕導【大】|道【石】
  • 〔T25 0636b28〕前【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636c15〕指【大】|相【宮】
  • 〔T25 0636c16〕厭【大】|能勝【石】
  • 〔T25 0636c20〕當【大】|尚【聖】
  • 〔T25 0636c21〕能【大】|得【石】
  • 〔T25 0636c27〕般若【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637a03〕言【大】|言大【宋】【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0637a05〕塗【大】|徒【石】
  • 〔T25 0637a14〕是【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637a15〕而最上、最妙【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637a16〕玉【大】|王【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637a21〕切【大】|切法【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637a23〕悲【大】|大悲【石】
  • 〔T25 0637b06〕事【大】|處【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637b08〕波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637b18〕著【大】|若【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0637b21〕著,不著則不生【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637b25〕念【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637b27〕著故【大】|故著【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637c10〕便【大】|更【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637c20〕相【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637c21〕相【大】|根【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637c24〕語【大】|諸【聖】
  • 〔T25 0637c24〕人說【大】|說人【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637c25〕教詔【大】|演說【石】
  • 〔T25 0637c28〕諸【大】|戲論【宮】
  • 〔T25 0637c28〕佛【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a02〕是【大】|有【聖】
  • 〔T25 0638a05〕著【大】|者【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a07〕息:「如【大】|自如【聖】|息而【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a07〕必【大】|畢竟【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a10〕無所得【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a11〕等【大】|等釋曰【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a11〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a12〕是【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a13〕著【大】|若【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a13〕相【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0638a16〕破【大】|故【聖】|誰【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a23〕至【大】|是【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638a24〕無【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0638a25〕亦【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638b07〕廣【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0638b17〕若【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638b28〕樹【大】|子【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0638b28〕菓【大】|樹【石】
  • 〔T25 0638c02〕時至【大】|至時【石】
  • 〔T25 0638c15〕人【大】|又【聖】
  • 〔T25 0638c19〕瘡【大】|鎗【宋】【元】【明】|創【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0638c22〕何【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0638c25〕亦【大】|多【聖】
  • 〔T25 0638c26〕夫【大】|人【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0638c29〕學【大】|得【石】
  • 〔T25 0639a04〕三【大】|二【石】
  • 〔T25 0639a09〕聚【大】|眾【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0639a11〕知【大】|智【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639a13〕識【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639a19〕故【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0639a20〕知。先【大】|先知【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0639a23〕先【大】|失【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639a24〕知【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639a25〕妨【大】|防【石】
  • 〔T25 0639a26〕明【大】|眼【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639a28〕相【大】|相相【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639b09〕妨【大】|防【石】(star · corresp → note(0639009) = the note at〔T25 0639a25〕)
  • 〔T25 0639b10〕相【大】|量【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b10〕量【大】|相【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b13〕法【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639b17〕節【大】|櫛【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b21〕多【大】|是【宮】
  • 〔T25 0639b22〕不【大】|〔-〕【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b26〕法【大】|性【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639b29〕聞【大】|門【宋】【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b30〕論【大】|經【石】
  • 〔T25 0639b30〕二【大】|二釋第六十九品上【宋】【元】【宮】|二釋第六十八品上【石】
  • 〔T25 0639c03〕大智度論釋大方便品第六十九之餘(卷八十三)【大】|大智度論卷八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品【宋】|大智度論卷第八十三釋第六十九品下訖第七十品上方便品【宮】|大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九下訖第七十品上【元】|大智度論卷八十三釋方便品第六十九之下【明】|大智度經論卷第八十釋第六十品下訖第六十九品上【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品六十八卷八十三【石】
  • 〔T25 0639c08〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639c08〕所【大】|能【石】
  • 〔T25 0639c11〕進【大】|進喜【石】
  • 〔T25 0639c14〕學【大】|學如禪波羅蜜所說當學【石】
  • 〔T25 0639c19〕時(K14n0549_p1325c18)(T08n0223_p0372a19)【CB】【麗-CB】|事【大】
  • 〔T25 0639c20〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0639c27〕婆【大】|波【聖】
  • 〔T25 0639c27〕若【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0640a07〕十方【大】|今十方【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0640a16〕生【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0640a29〕知【大】|於【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0640a29〕知【大】|於【宋】【宮】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0640003) = the note at〔T25 0640a29〕)
  • 〔T25 0640a29〕善【大】|善善【聖】
  • 〔T25 0640b07〕諦【大】|四諦【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0640b27〕切【大】|切種種【宋】|切種【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0640b27〕切【大】|切種種【宋】|切種【元】【明】【石】(star · corresp → note(0640006) = the note at〔T25 0640b27〕)
  • 〔T25 0640c01〕寶【大】|實【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0640c07〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0640c14〕如【大】|如是【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0640c18〕以【大】|亦【宮】
  • 〔T25 0640c21〕八【大】|餘【石】
  • 〔T25 0640c25〕五【大】|六【石】
  • 〔T25 0641a06〕涅槃【大】|但般【聖】
  • 〔T25 0641a22〕鳥【大】|烏【明】
  • 〔T25 0641b02〕量【大】|礙【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0641b07〕異【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0641b09〕寶【大】|實【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0641b18〕者【大】|名【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0641b18〕估【大】|賈【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0641b19〕駃【大】|快【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0641b20〕駃【大】|快【宋】【元】【明】(star · corresp → note(0641008) = the note at〔T25 0641b19〕)
  • 〔T25 0641b23〕鴦崛【大】|鴦屈【宋】【宮】|央掘【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0641b24〕善【大】|好【石】
  • 〔T25 0641c01〕解說【大】|解脫【宮】|說【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0641c02〕以【大】|以故【石】
  • 〔T25 0641c05〕說【大】|說釋六十八品竟【石】

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing. The full statement of AI's role across the 指月 project is maintained at methodology.

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0