大智度論 四攝品Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · The Four Means of Gathering

心要Essence

這一品從一個很不客氣的問題開始。前面幾品把「空」說盡了,須菩提於是問:「若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者,云何分別是善法、是不善法」,乃至四果、辟支佛道、無上菩提?既然什麼都空,善惡憑什麼還分?佛的回答不辯道理,只指事實:「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業」。夢是空的,夢裏造的業卻是真起的——空不礙它起,正因為它本來就起於顛倒。

菩薩要做的,不是把這場夢一口說破,而是一層層把人帶出來。經文說菩薩「住二空中——畢竟空、無始空,為眾生說法」,一面說一切法如夢如化,一面「於慳法中拔出眾生,教行檀波羅蜜」;等人貪著布施的福報了,再從福報中拔出,教他持戒;持戒生天,又從天上拔出,令住禪定;最後才「安置無餘涅槃及涅槃道中」。論主把這裏的機關點破:布施、持戒、禪定本身也是「因顛倒而生」,「雖少時益眾生,久則變異,能生苦惱故,亦教令捨離」。先給他一個可以抓的善,再奪走他所抓的——這就是本品講的方便。須菩提聽到這裏讚歎「諸菩薩摩訶薩甚希有難及」,佛許可了,並說這種希有難及之法,「一切聲聞、辟支佛不能報,何況餘人」。

底下講的希有法,第一件就是布施,而布施的頭一條是不揀擇。供養佛,與施給禽獸,「無有異」;施給正道中人,與施給凡夫,「皆無分別,等一布施」。理由只有一句:「一切法不異、不分別故。」果報也只有一句:「是菩薩無異、無別布施已,當得無分別法報,所謂一切種智。」因地不分別,果地才得無分別的智慧,因果是同一個相。反過來,若起念「佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養」,經文說得極重——「是非菩薩法」;「若分別簡擇,便墮諸佛、菩薩、辟支佛、學無學人、一切世間天及人訶責處」,而那句訶責更不留餘地:「誰請汝救一切眾生?汝為一切眾生舍、一切眾生護、一切眾生依」,既然自許是一切眾生的依靠,哪裏還有挑揀的餘地?

挑揀之外還有一層,是身。有人來乞菩薩的身體支節,經文說「是時不應生二心」,不作『若與?若不與?』的計較,因為「是菩薩摩訶薩為眾生故受身,眾生來取,何可不與」。這身本來就是為眾生受的。而真正讓這件事做得下去的,不是硬撐,是一個觀:「是中誰與、誰受?所施何物?是一切法自性皆不可得,以畢竟空故」——「住是諸空布施,是時具足檀波羅蜜」。論主後來還問:菩薩身又不是木石,怎麼割截而不生異心?答案並列了四種說法:久修忍辱的、久修慈悲的、得般若果報空心的、已是出三界法性生身的。四說並存,論主不裁一說為定。

佛眼所見的菩薩,一路看下去也全是這種不揀擇:「入大地獄,令火滅湯冷」,再「以三事教化:一者、神通,二者、知他心,三者、說法」;為諸佛作給使而不忘失法;「為畜生故,捨其壽命,割截身體,分散諸方」,讓吃到菩薩肉的眾生因此離畜生道。有人問:吃了菩薩的肉不是有罪嗎,怎麼反得度?論主答得清楚:這是菩薩本願——「若有眾生噉我肉者,當令得度」,而得度的實因不在肉,在肉所引發的慈心。至於三惡道為何不能度盡,論主用了一個很世間的比喻:「譬如大赦,及者得脫,不及者則不蒙。」

品名所繫的四攝,總標在這裏:「以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事。」布施又分兩種——「菩薩以二種施攝取眾生:財施、法施」。財施的清單很長,金銀珍寶、飲食衣服、乃至以己身給施;但財施從不停在物上,施完必定接著教:教三歸、教五戒、教禪定、教三十七道品,一直教到「無上安隱涅槃」。法施也分兩種:世間的是不淨觀、安那般那、四禪四無量四無色,凡「共凡夫所行法」都算;出世間的則是「三十七助道法、三解脫門」,其果只有一件——「斷一切煩惱習,是名聖無漏法果」。中間須菩提插問菩薩得不得一切種智,佛答得極簡:「菩薩心與佛心無有異」;論主再把這句擰緊:「今得一切種智,名為菩薩;已得一切種智,名為佛。」差別只在一個「今」與「已」。

四攝之中,布施講了三頁,其餘三事到卷八十九才各以一句收完:「菩薩摩訶薩以六波羅蜜為眾生說法」是愛語,「菩薩摩訶薩長夜教眾生,令行六波羅蜜」是利行,「菩薩摩訶薩以五神通力故種種變化,入五道中,與眾生同事」是同事。這種懸殊不是偏心,論主自己設問答了兩回:四事中何以獨廣布施?因為「布施中攝三事故,以財施、法施教化眾生,則無所不攝」,舉一即可例三。布施中何以又廣法施?因為「財施少,法施廣故」——「財施,有量果報;法施,無量果報」,財施只與三界富樂,法施能與涅槃常樂,而且「財施從法施生,聞法則能施故」。所以「以是等因緣故,廣說法施」。詳略之分,是果報的量本來如此。

相好一段最容易被當成裝飾,論主卻把它擺在一個很硬的位置上。三十二相與八十隨形好,轉輪聖王、提婆達、難陀也有幾分,何以還稱「出世間不共凡夫法」?答:「名字雖同,而威德、具足、淨潔、得處則不同於佛」——同一個名字,來處不同。又問:從頭到尾都在說五陰乃至一切種智,為什麼到論將結束才說相好?答:「佛有二種身:法身、生身。於二身中,法身為大」,法身利益大,所以先講;生身相好是聖無漏法的果報,所以放在最後。其間論十力、論性與欲,比喻一個比一個實在:佛籌量眾生可度不可度,「譬如良醫,觀其病相,審定知其可活則治之,不可活者則捨之」;性與欲之別是「性在內,欲在外。性重,欲輕。性難除,欲易捨。性深,欲淺」;一切到處道力與天眼力之別是「天眼但見生死時」,此力卻能未死而知因果。至於三十二相何以恰好與轉輪聖王同數,論主先答「三十二相不多不少,義如先說」,隨後並列其餘三說,四說並錄,其中一說極有意思——相是隨眾生所好而現的,有的地方不貴金色,有的地方以長指利爪為羅剎相、以手網縵為水鳥相,所以「是故佛隨眾生所好而為現相好。如是等,無有常定」。四說並列,論主同樣不裁。

到了八十隨形好,有兩條不像身相:一條是「識滿足」,一條是「住處安」。論主特地為這兩條設問。識滿足是什麼?「此識是果報生識,世間好醜自然而知」,不是學來的。住處安是什麼?「住處安者,如白衣勇士,牢持器仗,安據住處,則不可動」——出家之時,魔民惡鬼也動搖他不得。緊接著是四十二字門:「一字皆入四十二字,四十二字亦入一字」,而次第是「善學四十二字已,能善說字法;善說字法已,善說無字法」,歸結是「過一切名字故,名為佛法」。論主把這個次第說得更透:「善知字故,善知諸法名;善知諸法名故,善知諸法義。無字即是諸法實相義。」字是門,無字才是義;不由字不入,停在字上又不達。

最後一段是全品最緊的地方。眾生不可得、法不可得、法性也不可得,那菩薩憑什麼還為眾生說法?佛先把一切空掉一遍,然後說:「菩薩摩訶薩如是見一切法空,為眾生說法,不失諸空相」,並舉化人為喻——佛所化的人再化出無量人,教布施、教持戒,而「是化人無心、無心數法,云何分別破壞諸法」?說而無心,正是不壞法相。於是有那一串四重不住:「無所有法不住無所有法,所有法不住所有法,自性法不住自性法,他性法不住他性法」;論主配上兩個喻:「譬如虛空不住虛空」,「譬如火不住火中」。

再往下,須菩提步步進逼。色既不異法性,何以還分黑白果報、還分四沙門果?佛答「世諦故,分別說有果報,非第一義」。那麼凡夫也應該有須陀洹果了?佛以反問收之:「以凡夫人實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果,云何當有諸果」;「聖人知世諦、知第一義諦,有道、有修道,以是故聖人差別有諸果。」分別之所以能成立,繫於能分別者知不知;凡夫不知二諦,連世諦上的果也沒有他的分。然後佛把這個「知」也遣掉:「修道不得果,不修道亦不得果,亦不離道得果,亦不住道中得果。」論主解釋得很體貼:佛先前說修道得果,是就無著心說的;如今須菩提以著心問,「欲從道中出果,如麻中出油」,那就只好說不得。又怕人聽成不必修,補了一句「修尚不得,何況不修」,並設一喻:「譬如二人欲有所到:一者、住,不行;二者、失道。二俱不到。」不修與著心修,同樣到不了;分水嶺在「若心取相修道,雖有攝心禪定樂,無有道果」。

品末的收筆,收在說法者自己身上:「是菩薩自得無所著法,亦教人令得無所著法」,六度乃至一切種智,都教人不著。而那最後一句,像是把整品的力氣都放下了——「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中;於法性中不疑、不悶而說法,無罣、無礙、無遮,是則通達法性。」通達法性的人不住法性,正如火不住火中。四攝品講了那麼多攝取眾生的方法,末了只留這一個姿態:能說,而不住在所說裏;能度,而不站在能度的位置上。

This chapter begins with a very impolite question. The preceding chapters have said ‘emptiness’ to the end, and so Subhūti asks: ‘If dharmas are like a dream, like an echo, like a shadow, like a mirage, like an illusion, like a conjuration, without real substance, without any existent nature, and empty of specific marks, how are wholesome dharmas and unwholesome dharmas distinguished’, and so on up to the four fruits, the pratyekabuddha path, and unsurpassed awakening? Since everything is empty, by what are good and evil still told apart? The Buddha's answer argues no principle; it only points to a fact: ‘Ordinary foolish people find the dream and find the one who sees the dream, and so on up to finding the conjuration and finding the one who sees the conjuration, and give rise to wholesome deeds, unwholesome deeds, and indeterminate deeds of body, speech, and mind’. The dream is empty, yet the deeds done in the dream truly arise—emptiness does not hinder their arising, exactly because they arise from inversion in the first place.

What the bodhisattva has to do is not to expose this dream in one word, but to lead people out layer by layer. The sūtra says the bodhisattva ‘abides in the two emptinesses—ultimate emptiness and beginningless emptiness—and teaches the Dharma for beings’; on one side he says that all dharmas are like a dream and like a conjuration, on the other ‘he pulls beings out from the dharma of stinginess and teaches them to practise dānapāramitā’; when a person has come to crave the reward of giving, he pulls him out again from the reward and teaches him to keep morality; keeping morality he is born among the gods, and again he is pulled out of the heavens and made to abide in meditative concentration; only at the last is he ‘set in nirvāṇa without remainder and in the path to nirvāṇa’. The treatise-author lays bare the mechanism here: giving, keeping morality, and meditative concentration themselves also ‘arise because of inversion’, ‘though for a short time they benefit beings, in the long run they change and can give rise to suffering and vexation, so he also teaches them to give these up’. First give him a good thing he can hold on to, then take away what he holds—this is the skilful means this chapter speaks of. Hearing this far, Subhūti praises, ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas are very rare and hard to equal’; the Buddha approves, and says that this dharma, rare and hard to equal, ‘no śrāvaka or pratyekabuddha can requite, how much less other people’.

Of the rare dharmas spoken of below, the first is giving, and the first article of giving is not picking and choosing. Making offerings to a Buddha and giving to birds and beasts ‘are without difference’; giving to a person on the right path and giving to an ordinary person ‘are all without discrimination, one and the same giving’. The reason is only one sentence: ‘because all dharmas are not different and without discrimination.’ The retribution too is only one sentence: ‘This bodhisattva, having given without difference and without distinction, will obtain the retribution of the dharma without discrimination, namely the omniscience of all kinds.’ Only when there is no discrimination on the ground of the cause is the wisdom without discrimination obtained on the ground of the fruit; cause and fruit are one and the same mark. Conversely, if the thought arises, ‘the Buddha is a field of merit, I should make offerings; birds and beasts are not a field of merit, I should not make offerings’, the sūtra speaks with the utmost weight—‘this is not the bodhisattva's dharma’; ‘if he discriminates and picks and chooses, he falls into the place of rebuke by the buddhas, bodhisattvas, pratyekabuddhas, those in training and beyond training, and all the gods and humans of the world’, and that rebuke leaves no room: ‘Who asked you to rescue all beings? You are the house of all beings, the protection of all beings, the refuge of all beings’; since you yourself have promised to be the refuge of all beings, where is there still room to pick and choose?

Beyond picking and choosing there is one more layer, which is the body. When someone comes to beg the bodhisattva's limbs and joints, the sūtra says ‘at that time he should not give rise to two minds’, not reckoning ‘shall I give? shall I not give?’, because ‘this bodhisattva-mahāsattva receives his body for the sake of beings; when beings come to take it, how can he not give?’ This body was received for the sake of beings from the first. And what truly makes this deed doable is not gritting the teeth but a contemplation: ‘Who here gives, who receives? What thing is given? The self-nature of all these dharmas is unfindable, because of ultimate emptiness’—‘abiding in these emptinesses he gives, and at that time he makes dānapāramitā complete’. The treatise-author later also asks: the bodhisattva's body is not wood or stone; how is it cut and severed without a different mind arising? The answer sets four sayings side by side: one who has long cultivated patience, one who has long cultivated kindness and compassion, one who has obtained the empty mind that is the retribution of prajñā, and one who is already the body born of the dharma-nature beyond the three realms. The four sayings stand together, and the treatise-author rules none of them the settled one.

The bodhisattvas seen by the Buddha-eye, looked at all the way down, are all of this same not picking and choosing: ‘he enters the great hells and makes the fire go out and the boiling water grow cold’, and then ‘teaches and transforms by three things: first, supernormal power; second, knowing others' minds; third, teaching the Dharma’; he serves as attendant to the buddhas and does not forget or lose the Dharma; ‘for the sake of animals he gives up his life, cuts and severs his body, and scatters it in all directions’, so that the beings who eat the bodhisattva's flesh thereby leave the animal destiny. Someone asks: is it not a sin to eat the bodhisattva's flesh; how do they instead come to be delivered? The treatise-author answers clearly: this is the bodhisattva's original vow—‘if there are beings who eat my flesh, may they come to be delivered’—and the real cause of deliverance lies not in the flesh but in the kind mind the flesh calls forth. As for why the three evil destinies cannot be delivered to the last one, the treatise-author uses a very worldly simile: ‘It is as a great amnesty: those it reaches are freed, those it does not reach receive nothing.’

The four means of gathering to which the chapter's name is tied are marked in general here: ‘by four things he gathers in beings. What are the four? Giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour.’ Giving is further divided into two—‘the bodhisattva gathers in beings by two kinds of giving: the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma’. The list of the gift of wealth is very long: gold, silver, and precious jewels, food, drink, and clothing, and so on up to giving his own body; but the gift of wealth never stops at the thing; having given, he always goes on to teach: he teaches the three refuges, teaches the five precepts, teaches meditative concentration, teaches the thirty-seven limbs of the path, teaching all the way to ‘the unsurpassed nirvāṇa of peace and security’. The gift of Dharma too is divided into two: the worldly is the contemplation of impurity, ānāpāna, the four dhyānas, the four immeasurable minds, and the four formless absorptions, whatever counts as ‘dharmas practised in common with ordinary people’; the world-transcending is ‘the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path and the three gates of liberation’, whose fruit is only one thing—‘the cutting off of all the afflictions and their habitual residues; this is named the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows’. In between, Subhūti puts in a question whether the bodhisattva obtains the omniscience of all kinds, and the Buddha answers most simply: ‘The bodhisattva's mind and the Buddha's mind are without difference’; the treatise-author tightens this sentence further: ‘now obtaining the omniscience of all kinds, he is named bodhisattva; having obtained the omniscience of all kinds, he is named Buddha.’ The difference lies only in ‘now’ and ‘having’.

Among the four means of gathering, giving is spoken of for three pages, while the other three things are each gathered in one sentence only in fascicle eighty-nine: ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattva teaches the Dharma for beings by the six perfections’ is kind speech, ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattva through the long night teaches beings and makes them practise the six perfections’ is beneficial action, ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattva by the power of the five supernormal powers transforms himself in all kinds of ways, enters the five destinies, and shares in endeavour with beings’ is shared endeavour. This disparity is not partiality; the treatise-author himself sets the question and answers twice: why, among the four things, is giving alone spoken of broadly? Because ‘giving contains the three things; teaching and transforming beings by the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma, there is nothing it does not gather’, and raising one gives the pattern for three. Why within giving is the gift of Dharma again spoken of broadly? Because ‘the gift of wealth is little and the gift of Dharma is broad’—‘the gift of wealth has a measured retribution; the gift of Dharma has an immeasurable retribution’, the gift of wealth gives only the riches and pleasures of the three realms while the gift of Dharma can give the constant pleasure of nirvāṇa, and moreover ‘the gift of wealth arises from the gift of Dharma, for having heard the Dharma one can give’. So ‘by such causes and conditions, the gift of Dharma is spoken of broadly’. The division of detail and brevity is as the measure of the retribution is from the first.

The passage on the marks and minor signs is the easiest to take as ornament, yet the treatise-author sets it in a very hard place. The thirty-two marks and the eighty minor marks—the wheel-turning sage king, Devadatta, and Nanda have some share of them; why are they still called ‘world-transcending dharmas not shared with ordinary people’? Answer: ‘though the names are the same, in majesty, completeness, purity, and the place of their obtaining they are not the same as the Buddha's’—the same name, a different source. Again it is asked: from beginning to end it has spoken of the five aggregates and so on up to the omniscience of all kinds; why does it speak of the marks and minor signs only when the treatise is about to close? Answer: ‘The Buddha has two kinds of body: the Dharma body and the fleshly body. Of the two bodies, the Dharma body is the greater’, the Dharma body's benefit is great, so it is spoken of first; the marks and minor signs of the fleshly body are the retribution of the noble dharmas without outflows, so they are placed last. In between, discussing the ten powers and discussing nature and desire, the similes grow more concrete one after another: the Buddha reckons which beings can be delivered and which cannot, ‘as a good physician looks at the marks of the sickness and, judging and knowing for certain that the patient can live, treats him, and where he cannot live, gives him up’; the difference between nature and desire is ‘nature is within, desire is without. Nature is heavy, desire is light. Nature is hard to remove, desire is easy to give up. Nature is deep, desire is shallow’; the difference between the power of the paths leading everywhere and the power of the divine eye is that ‘the divine eye sees only the time of birth and death’, while this power knows cause and fruit before death. As for why the thirty-two marks are exactly the same in number as the wheel-turning sage king's, the treatise-author first answers ‘the thirty-two marks are neither more nor fewer; the meaning is as explained before’, and then sets out three further sayings, four sayings recorded side by side, one of them most interesting—that the marks are shown according to what beings like, for in some places the golden colour is not prized, and in some places long fingers and sharp nails are taken as the mark of a rākṣasa and webbed hands as the mark of a water-bird, so ‘therefore the Buddha shows the marks and minor signs according to what beings like. Such as these have nothing constant and fixed’. Four sayings set side by side, and again the treatise-author does not rule.

Coming to the eighty minor marks, two of them do not look like bodily marks: one is ‘consciousness full’, one is ‘secure in his dwelling-place’. The treatise-author sets questions specially for these two. What is consciousness full? ‘This consciousness is a consciousness born as retribution, which knows of itself the fair and the foul of the world’, not learned. What is secure in his dwelling-place? ‘Secure in his dwelling-place is like a white-robed warrior who, firmly holding his weapons and securely occupying his place, cannot be moved’—at the time of leaving home, Māra's people and evil ghosts cannot shake him either. Right after come the forty-two gates of letters: ‘each one letter enters all forty-two letters, and the forty-two letters also enter one letter’, and the sequence is ‘having trained well in the forty-two letters, he can speak well of the dharma of letters; having spoken well of the dharma of letters, he speaks well of the dharma without letters’, and the conclusion is ‘because it passes beyond all names and letters, it is named the Buddha's Dharma’. The treatise-author states this sequence more thoroughly: ‘Because he knows letters well, he knows well the names of dharmas; because he knows well the names of dharmas, he knows well the meaning of dharmas. Being without letters is precisely the meaning of the real mark of all dharmas.’ Letters are the gate, being without letters is the meaning; without letters one does not enter, and stopping at letters one does not arrive.

The last passage is the tightest place of the whole chapter. Beings are unfindable, dharmas are unfindable, the nature of dharmas too is unfindable; by what then does the bodhisattva still teach the Dharma for beings? The Buddha first empties everything once more, and then says: ‘The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, thus seeing all dharmas as empty, teaches the Dharma for beings and does not lose the marks of the emptinesses’, and raises the simile of the conjured person—a person conjured by the Buddha further conjures immeasurable people and teaches them giving and teaches them to keep morality, and ‘this conjured person is without mind and without mental-factor dharmas; how could he discriminate and destroy dharmas?’ To speak while without mind is exactly not to destroy the marks of dharmas. Then comes that string of four not-abidings: ‘the dharma without anything existent does not abide in the dharma without anything existent; the existent dharma does not abide in the existent dharma; the dharma of self-nature does not abide in the dharma of self-nature; the dharma of other-nature does not abide in the dharma of other-nature’; the treatise-author matches it with two similes: ‘It is as space does not abide in space’, ‘It is as fire does not abide within fire.’

Further on, Subhūti presses step by step. Since form is not different from the nature of dharmas, why are black and white retributions still distinguished, and the four fruits of the śramaṇa? The Buddha answers, ‘by reason of worldly truth retribution is spoken of with distinctions; it is not the highest meaning’. Then should ordinary people too have the fruit of the srota-āpanna? The Buddha gathers it with a question in return: ‘Because ordinary people really do not know worldly truth, do not know the truth of the highest meaning, do not know the path, and do not know how to distinguish the fruits of the path, how should they have the fruits’; ‘the sages know worldly truth, know the truth of the highest meaning, have the path, and have the cultivation of the path; therefore the sages have the various fruits with distinctions.’ That distinction can be established hangs on whether the one who distinguishes knows; ordinary people do not know the two truths, so even the fruits within worldly truth are no share of theirs. Then the Buddha dispels this ‘knowing’ too: ‘Cultivating the path he does not obtain the fruit; not cultivating the path he does not obtain the fruit either; nor does he obtain the fruit apart from the path; nor does he obtain the fruit abiding within the path.’ The treatise-author explains with great consideration: when the Buddha earlier said that cultivating the path one obtains the fruit, this was said with regard to the mind without clinging; now Subhūti asks with a clinging mind, ‘wishing to bring the fruit out from within the path, as oil is brought out from sesame’, and so one can only say that it is not obtained. Fearing again that people will hear this as no need to cultivate, he adds a sentence, ‘even cultivating, it is not obtained, how much less without cultivating’, and sets a simile: ‘It is as two people who wish to reach somewhere: one stays and does not go; one loses the road. Neither of the two arrives.’ Not cultivating and cultivating with a clinging mind alike fail to arrive; the watershed lies in ‘if the mind grasps at marks and cultivates the path, though there is the pleasure of meditative concentration that gathers the mind, there is no fruit of the path’.

The closing stroke of the chapter comes back upon the one who teaches: ‘this bodhisattva himself obtains the dharma without clinging, and also teaches others and makes them obtain the dharma without clinging’, the six perfections and so on up to the omniscience of all kinds, all taught to others without clinging. And that last sentence seems to set down the whole chapter's strength—‘One who thoroughly penetrates does not grasp at the mark of the nature of dharmas and does not abide within the nature of dharmas; within the nature of dharmas he teaches the Dharma without doubt and without oppression, without hindrance, without obstruction, without blocking: this is to penetrate the nature of dharmas.’ One who penetrates the nature of dharmas does not abide in the nature of dharmas, just as fire does not abide within fire. The chapter on the four means of gathering has spoken of so many ways of gathering in beings, and at the end leaves only this one posture: able to speak, yet not abiding in what is spoken; able to deliver, yet not standing in the position of the one who delivers.

義疏 · 總說Exposition · Overview

總說

〈四攝品〉是《大智度論》釋《大品般若》一部將訖時,把菩薩之行轉向眾生的一品。前品〈六喻品〉所說是無相中仍能具足六度,六喻——夢、響、影、焰、幻、化——是前品立的眼;本品開卷第一句便把這六個字原樣接過來,而所問者已不是自行,是眾生:「世尊!若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者,云何分別是善法、是不善法,是世間法、是出世間法,是有漏法、是無漏法,是有為法、是無為法」。空既說到這一步,一個最實際的難處便浮出來:若一切如夢,眾生何須度、善惡何從分?佛之答不從義理轉圜,從事實入手——「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業」:夢中人自己不知是夢,業卻真起,苦卻真受。故菩薩之所行成了兩橛而一事:一邊「住二空中——畢竟空、無始空,為眾生說法」,一邊「以方便力故,於慳法中拔出眾生,教行檀波羅蜜」,一層一層拔到「安置無餘涅槃及涅槃道中」。品名之所以立在「四攝」,即在此處:攝是接引之手,而這隻手自身住在畢竟空裡。全品二經二論,跨卷八十八、八十九,依卷界與經論之界分作三分弧:之上一經,列攝生之事;之中一論,逐條問其所以;之下一經一論,由事轉入說法者自身之無所住,終以「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中」收筆。

之上一分,說攝之事。經文先立菩薩之所住:「住報得六波羅蜜中及住報得五神通、三十七助道法」,然後才說攝——可度者「隨其所應而攝取之」。其下入布施,而布施一門開得最闊。先說平等:菩薩布施,「若供養佛、辟支佛、阿羅漢、阿那含、斯陀含、須陀洹等無有異;若施入正道中人及凡人,下至禽獸,皆無分別,等一布施」,所以然者只一句——「一切法不異、不分別故」。反面亦說得極重:若起念「佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養」,經文直判「是非菩薩法」;若於來乞者分別應與不應與,便墮諸佛聖賢乃至世間天人之訶責:「誰請汝救一切眾生?」再進一層是捨身:人非人來乞身體支節,「不應生二心」,其理仍不在勇不勇,在受身之本義——「是菩薩摩訶薩為眾生故受身,眾生來取,何可不與?」更進一層是空中之施:施時應念「是中誰與、誰受?所施何物?」,三輪俱不可得,「住是諸空布施,是時具足檀波羅蜜」,乃至身被割截時亦只作一念——「截我者誰?割我者誰?」。此下佛以佛眼所見六事證成攝生之廣:入大地獄「令火滅湯冷」而「一者、神通,二者、知他心,三者、說法」三事教化;為諸佛給使而所聞「終不忘失」;為畜生「捨其壽命,割截身體,分散諸方」;除餓鬼飢渴;於諸天示現火燒宮殿而告之「諸天!一切有為法悉皆無常,誰得安者?」;於諸梵天破其邪見而問「汝等云何於空相虛妄諸法中而生邪見?」。至此四攝之名方總標而出:「以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事」;而布施復開二門:「菩薩以二種施攝取眾生:財施、法施」。財施之目自金銀珍寶以至己身,其語最可誦者是那一句招呼——「汝等若有所須,各來取之,如取己物,莫得疑難!」;而財施不止於物,施已必繼之以教,終於「財施已,後教令得無上安隱涅槃」。法施則「有二種:一者、世間,二者、出世間」,世間者不淨觀、安那般那乃至四無色定,出世間者三十七品、三解脫門以至菩提;而所謂果,只一句——「斷一切煩惱習,是名聖無漏法果」。之上一分末後,須菩提問出全品最短而最利的一問:「菩薩與佛有何等異?」佛答亦不繞:「菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智,是名為佛。所以者何?菩薩心與佛心無有異。」其下便逐目列出世間不共凡夫法,自四念處、四正勤一路列到十八不共法、三十二相,末以「光明遍照三千大千世界」一節收住——列目雖長,其位置正在法施之下:『這一長串名相,是菩薩要施給眾生的東西』。

之中一分,說攝之所以。論主開卷先替讀者問一個看似多餘的問題:這個空與善惡的問題,前面已問過多次,何以又問?其答凡四重,首重「是事上已答」回指前品,其下三重:一者「眾生從無始生死已來著心深難解故,須菩提復作是重問」;二者「是般若波羅蜜欲說是空,義要故,數問」;三者最見悲心——「佛滅度五百年後,像法中眾生愛著佛法,墮著法中」,故憐愍而重明。二空之用,論主亦在此處一句判定:「畢竟空破諸法;無始空破眾生相」。其下逐條釋經。同樣教布施持戒禪定,前文已說,此處何異?「先說生身菩薩,今說變化身。先說一國土,今說無量世界。」何以能令佛與畜生齊等?不是輕佛,是於一切法修畢竟空心,故「是故知一切法畢竟空故,不輕畜生,不著心貴佛」;而論主隨即補一層,免人誤讀為混同善惡——「菩薩有二法門:一者、畢竟空法門,二者、分別好惡法門」,入空門則等觀,入分別門則阿羅漢、辟支佛尚不及佛,何況畜生。最見古論並錄不判之法者,是割截一條:「菩薩身非木石,云何眾生來割截而不生異心?」論主列四說而不裁——或曰「菩薩久修羼提波羅蜜故,能不愁惱;如羼提仙人被截手足,血皆為乳」,或曰久修慈悲「譬如草木無有瞋心」,或曰得般若果報空心故心不動,或曰「是菩薩非生死身,是出三界法性生身」。既能入地獄度生,何以三惡道不空?答曰眾生倍多,隨可度因緣而度,「譬如大赦,及者得脫,不及者則不蒙」。食菩薩肉者應當有罪,何以反得度?答在菩薩本願——「若有眾生噉我肉者,當令得度」,而論主特特點破因果之所在:「非以噉肉故得度,以起發慈心故,得免畜生,生善處,值佛得度」。何以獨廣說人道?因「三惡道中苦多故,眾生少疑」,諸天有天眼自見罪福,唯人「以肉眼不見罪福因緣果報,又多著外道邪師及邪見經書」。四攝何以只廣說布施?「布施中攝三事故」,舉一而例其三。布施中何以又廣說法施?「財施少,法施廣故」——「財施,有量果報;法施,無量果報」,「財施,能與三界富樂;法施,能與涅槃常樂」。須菩提何以要問菩薩得一切種智不?論主看出這是一個進退兩難之問,而答之以時位:「今得一切種智,名為菩薩;已得一切種智,名為佛」。九次第定、三十二相、八十隨形好本是世間共有,何以稱出世間不共?答有二節:「滅受定,但聖人能得」;而相好之與轉輪聖王等者,「名字雖同,而威德、具足、淨潔、得處則不同於佛」。何以一部論將訖方說相好?因「佛有二種身:法身、生身」,法身益多故先廣說,生身相好是無漏果報故置於末。十力何以但十?「佛實有無量智力,但以眾生不能得、不能行故不說」——十力者是可度眾生之事辦得成的那十種,故論主以醫為喻:「譬如良醫,觀其病相,審定知其可活則治之,不可活者則捨之」。其下辨性與欲之別,語極簡而極辨:「性在內,欲在外。性重,欲輕。性難除,欲易捨。性深,欲淺。」;辨一切到處道力與天眼之異,則曰「天眼但見生死時」,此力兼知未死時之因果;辨後三力何以唯佛所有,則歸於一句——「是故說法,初無空言」。之中一分末後又是一番並錄不判:佛身何以正與轉輪聖王同具三十二相?一說「三十二相不多不少,義如先說」;一說相不定,「隨眾生所好,可以引導其心者為現」;一說「此三十二相實定,以神通力變化身,隨眾生所好而為現相」;一說「佛有時神通變化,有時隨世界處生,當生處不得言神通變化」,而末一說復引一經為況:「或現金色、或現銀色、或日月星宿色,或長、或短,隨可引導眾生則為現相」。

之下一分,由攝轉入說法者自身。卷八十九以「之餘」續題重起,經文先把八十隨形好逐項列盡,收以「是八十隨形好,佛身成就」;然後四攝之餘三事各以一句收之——愛語是「菩薩摩訶薩以六波羅蜜為眾生說法」,利行是「菩薩摩訶薩長夜教眾生,令行六波羅蜜」,同事是「菩薩摩訶薩以五神通力故種種變化,入五道中,與眾生同事」。四攝既收,經文轉入四十二字門:「一字皆入四十二字,四十二字亦入一字」,而其次第有終有始——「善學四十二字已,能善說字法;善說字法已,善說無字法」,末句尤重:「過一切名字故,名為佛法」。至此須菩提提出全品最緊之難:眾生不可得、法不可得、法性不可得,六度乃至八十隨形好皆不可得,則「菩薩尚不可得,何況當有菩薩法!」——既如此,說法的是誰、說給誰?佛之答不迴避,先把十八空與一切法門逐一空盡,然後給出一個不落兩邊的姿態:菩薩「如是見一切法空,為眾生說法,不失諸空相」。何以能不失?以化人為喻:佛所化人復化作無量人而教之布施持戒,「是化人無心、無心數法,云何分別破壞諸法?」——說而無說者之心,故說不壞法。其下說所拔者之實相:「是色不縛不脫,受、想、行、識不縛不脫」;說能說者之無住:「無所有法不住無所有法,所有法不住所有法,自性法不住自性法,他性法不住他性法」。既然「色不異法性、不異如、不異實際」,何以猶分別黑白業報與四沙門果?佛答立在二諦:「世諦故,分別說有果報,非第一義;第一義中不可說因緣果報」。須菩提乘此再逼一步——若第一義中無分別,凡夫豈不應有聖果?佛之破法極利,只反問凡夫知不知二諦:「以凡夫人實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果,云何當有諸果?」;反之「聖人知世諦、知第一義諦,有道、有修道,以是故聖人差別有諸果」。再問修道得果不,佛則四句俱遮:「修道不得果,不修道亦不得果,亦不離道得果,亦不住道中得果」。而後佛以一連串反問把須菩提自己的答案逼出來:諸果是有為是無為?答「皆是無為!」;無為中有分別不?答不也;通達一切法一相時有分別不?答不也——難自己就散了。論②於此先補釋兩個小目:八十好中「識滿足」何以列在身相?因「此識是果報生識,世間好醜自然而知」;「住處安」何解?「住處安者,如白衣勇士,牢持器仗,安據住處,則不可動」。次釋字門而歸於一句——「無字即是諸法實相義」,其故在「諸法義中,諸法無名字」。次辨說法者三種失:作諸法皆空而所說不空是一失,「若以所說不空,則為失空相」是二失,口說空而心是有是三失——「若口說空而心是有,是亦為失」;不住之義則以三喻明之,「譬如虛空不住虛空」、「譬如火不住火中」、「譬如水性中無火性」。次自設一問:「此中何以但說二空名為法?」答曰所有者唯法與眾生二事,「若言畢竟空,則破諸法;若言無始空,則破眾生」,而所以獨取畢竟空者,「餘空如火燒木,猶有灰燼;畢竟空無灰無燼」——其下仍存異說不判:「若說十八空無咎,略說故說二空」。末後一大節最堪細讀:論主把須菩提之難判為著心所起——「今須菩提以著心問,欲從道中出果,如麻中出油」;又恐聽者反執不修,隨手堵住:「修尚不得,何況不修!」,並以二人不到為喻:「譬如二人欲有所到:一者、住,不行;二者、失道。二俱不到。」;末乃點出證時之心方是真實——「唯是心為真實,餘時皆虛誑」。全品終於一句姿態:「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中;於法性中不疑、不悶而說法,無罣、無礙、無遮,是則通達法性。」

三分弧之別,一言可斷:之上說攝之事,之中說攝之所以,之下說攝者之無所住。之上一條一條地給——給財、給法、給身、給名相之長列;之中一問一問地追——同一件事,問它憑什麼能成;之下一番一番地掃——掃到連說法者自身都不許站住。而三分之間有一線貫串,即「不分別」三字:之上之不分別,是不分別福田與非福田、應與與不應與;之中之不分別,是不輕畜生、不著心貴佛,而同時不廢分別好惡之門;之下之不分別,是為眾生說法而不分別諸法、不取法性相。四攝之所以能成,正因為攝者不住其攝;若住,則布施成擇施,說法成執法,最後連法性亦成一個可住之處。品名立在「四攝」而品末歸於「通達法性」,一品之義盡在此一去一歸之間。

因此,讀此品之每一段時,至少可問三層。其一,這一段所說的是給什麼,還是給的姿態——經文列相列目最長之處,其位置皆在法施之下,可見長列不是誇飾,是清單;而清單之外,那句「等一布施」才是判準。凡自覺已行布施時,先問所施之物,再問施時有無簡擇之心;論主說得明白,簡擇之病不在於分得清,在於分了之後就不給。其二,這一段若被反用,會成什麼——本品之危處全在「空」字:說空而不施,說不分別而輕善惡,說無所得而廢修道。論主把這三種反用都堵死了:畢竟空之外別立分別好惡法門,是堵第二種;「修尚不得,何況不修!」是堵第三種;而第一種堵得最早——四攝之首即是布施,空的第一個用處是能捨,不是能推。其三,我今力所不及,此品於我何用——之下一分正為此設。八十好與十力,我學不來;但「不失諸空相」與「不取法性相」是隨處可用的:說法時不自居說者,是不取;受人稱歎時不以為實有所得,是不住。順著二經二論讀下去,終會落在論主那一喻上——著心求果者「如麻中出油」,以為道中有個果可以榨出來;而全品末後所許的,不過是一種說法時的無礙:「於法性中不疑、不悶而說法」。不疑者非已證,是不在說時另起一念去疑;不悶者非無難,是難不成其為障。攝生之行千頭萬緒,其歸宿只是這一句。

依原論次序讀下去

Overview

"The Four Means of Gathering" is the chapter in which, as the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa's explanation of the Larger Sūtra draws near its end, the bodhisattva's practice is turned toward beings. What the preceding chapter, "The Six Similes", spoke of is that within the signless one can still make the six perfections complete; the six similes—dream, echo, shadow, mirage, illusion, conjuration—are the eye that the preceding chapter set up; the very first sentence of this chapter takes these six Chinese characters over just as they stood, yet what it asks about is no longer one's own practice but beings: 「世尊!若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者,云何分別是善法、是不善法,是世間法、是出世間法,是有漏法、是無漏法,是有為法、是無為法」 tr. "World-Honored One! If all dharmas are like a dream, like an echo, like a shadow, like a mirage, like an illusion, like a conjuration, without real substance, without any existent nature, and empty of specific marks, how is it distinguished that this is a wholesome dharma, this is an unwholesome dharma; this is a worldly dharma, this is a world-transcending dharma; this is a dharma with outflows, this is a dharma without outflows; this is a conditioned dharma, this is an unconditioned dharma". With emptiness spoken of as far as this, a most practical difficulty rises to the surface: if everything is like a dream, why need beings be delivered, and from where are good and evil to be told apart? The Buddha's answer does not turn round by way of principle; it enters from fact—「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業」 tr. "ordinary foolish people find the dream and find the one who sees the dream, and so on up to finding the conjuration and finding the one who sees the conjuration, and give rise to wholesome deeds, unwholesome deeds, and indeterminate deeds of body, speech, and mind": the person in the dream does not himself know that it is a dream, yet the deeds truly arise and the suffering is truly undergone. So what the bodhisattva practises becomes two halves that are one matter: on one side he 「住二空中——畢竟空、無始空,為眾生說法」 tr. "abides in the two emptinesses—ultimate emptiness and beginningless emptiness—and teaches the Dharma for beings", on the other side 「以方便力故,於慳法中拔出眾生,教行檀波羅蜜」 tr. "by reason of the power of skilful means he pulls beings out from the dharma of stinginess and teaches them to practise dānapāramitā", pulling them out layer upon layer until he 「安置無餘涅槃及涅槃道中」 tr. "sets them in nirvāṇa without remainder and in the path to nirvāṇa". The reason the chapter's name is set on 「四攝」 tr. "the four means of gathering" lies just here: gathering is the hand that receives and leads, and this hand itself abides in ultimate emptiness. The whole chapter, two sūtras and two treatises, spans fascicles eighty-eight and eighty-nine, and by the boundaries of the fascicles and of sūtra and treatise it is divided into a three-part arc: the First Part, one sūtra, lists the matters of gathering beings; the Middle Part, one treatise, asks item by item for their reasons; the Last Part, one sūtra and one treatise, turns from the matters into the non-abiding of the one who teaches the Dharma himself, and ends with 「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中」 tr. "One who thoroughly penetrates does not grasp at the mark of the nature of dharmas and does not abide within the nature of dharmas" as its closing stroke.

The First Part speaks of the matters of gathering. The sūtra text first establishes where the bodhisattva abides—he 「住報得六波羅蜜中及住報得五神通、三十七助道法」 tr. "abides in the six perfections obtained as retribution, and abides in the five supernormal powers and the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path obtained as retribution"—and only then speaks of gathering: those who can be delivered 「隨其所應而攝取之」 tr. "he gathers them in according to what is fitting for them". Below this it enters giving, and the one gate of giving is opened widest. First it speaks of equality: when the bodhisattva gives, 「若供養佛、辟支佛、阿羅漢、阿那含、斯陀含、須陀洹等無有異;若施入正道中人及凡人,下至禽獸,皆無分別,等一布施」 tr. "whether he makes offerings to the Buddha, the pratyekabuddha, the arhat, the anāgāmin, the sakṛdāgāmin, the srota-āpanna, and so on, there is no difference; whether he gives to people who have entered the right path or to ordinary people, down to birds and beasts, all is without discrimination, one and the same giving", and the reason for it is only one sentence—「一切法不異、不分別故」 tr. "because all dharmas are not different and without discrimination". The reverse side too is spoken with great weight: if the thought arises, 「佛是福田,我應供養;禽獸非福田,不應供養」 tr. "The Buddha is a field of merit, I should make offerings; birds and beasts are not a field of merit, I should not make offerings", the sūtra text rules outright, 「是非菩薩法」 tr. "this is not the bodhisattva's dharma"; if, toward those who come to beg, he discriminates whom he should give to and whom he should not, he falls under the rebuke of the buddhas and the sages and so on up to the gods and humans of the world: 「誰請汝救一切眾生?」 tr. "Who asked you to rescue all beings?" One layer further is giving up the body: when humans and non-humans come to beg his limbs and joints, 「不應生二心」 tr. "he should not give rise to two minds", and the reason again does not lie in whether he is brave or not, but in the original meaning of receiving a body—「是菩薩摩訶薩為眾生故受身,眾生來取,何可不與?」 tr. "This bodhisattva-mahāsattva receives his body for the sake of beings; when beings come to take it, how can he not give?" A layer further still is giving within emptiness: at the time of giving he should think, 「是中誰與、誰受?所施何物?」 tr. "Who here gives, who receives? What thing is given?"; the three wheels are all unfindable, 「住是諸空布施,是時具足檀波羅蜜」 tr. "abiding in these emptinesses he gives, and at that time he makes dānapāramitā complete", and even when his body is cut and severed he has only one thought—「截我者誰?割我者誰?」 tr. "Who is it that cuts me off? Who is it that severs me?". Below this the Buddha proves the breadth of gathering beings by six matters seen with the Buddha-eye: they enter the great hells and 「令火滅湯冷」 tr. "make the fire go out and the boiling water grow cold", teaching and transforming by three things, 「一者、神通,二者、知他心,三者、說法」 tr. "first, supernormal power; second, knowing others' minds; third, teaching the Dharma"; they serve as attendants to the buddhas, and what they hear they 「終不忘失」 tr. "never in the end forget or lose"; for the sake of animals they 「捨其壽命,割截身體,分散諸方」 tr. "give up their own lives, cut and sever their bodies, and scatter them in all directions"; they remove the hunger and thirst of the hungry ghosts; among the gods they show the palaces burning and tell them, 「諸天!一切有為法悉皆無常,誰得安者?」 tr. "Gods! All conditioned dharmas are wholly impermanent; who can obtain security?"; among the Brahmā gods they break their wrong views and ask, 「汝等云何於空相虛妄諸法中而生邪見?」 tr. "Why do you give rise to wrong views within dharmas whose mark is empty and which are false?". Only at this point is the name of the four means of gathering marked out in general: 「以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事」 tr. "He gathers in beings by four things. What are the four? Giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour"; and giving is further opened into two gates: 「菩薩以二種施攝取眾生:財施、法施」 tr. "the bodhisattva gathers in beings by two kinds of giving: the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma". The items of the gift of wealth run from gold, silver, and precious jewels to his own body, and the words in it most worth reciting are that one call—「汝等若有所須,各來取之,如取己物,莫得疑難!」 tr. "If you have any need, each of you come and take it, as if taking your own things; have no hesitation!"; and the gift of wealth does not stop at things: having given, he always follows with teaching, ending in 「財施已,後教令得無上安隱涅槃」 tr. "having given the gift of wealth, he afterwards teaches them and makes them obtain the unsurpassed nirvāṇa of peace and security". The gift of Dharma 「有二種:一者、世間,二者、出世間」 tr. "is of two kinds: first, worldly; second, world-transcending": the worldly is the contemplation of impurity, ānāpāna, and so on up to the four formless absorptions; the world-transcending is the thirty-seven limbs of the path, the three gates of liberation, and so on up to awakening; and as for what is called the fruit, there is only one sentence—「斷一切煩惱習,是名聖無漏法果」 tr. "cutting off all the afflictions and their habitual residues—this is named the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows". At the end of the First Part, Subhūti asks the shortest and sharpest question of the whole chapter: 「菩薩與佛有何等異?」 tr. "What difference is there between the bodhisattva and the Buddha?" The Buddha's answer does not go round either: 「菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智,是名為佛。所以者何?菩薩心與佛心無有異。」 tr. "The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, having obtained the omniscience of all kinds, is named Buddha. Why? The bodhisattva's mind and the Buddha's mind are without difference." Below this he lists item by item the world-transcending dharmas not shared with ordinary people, from the four foundations of mindfulness and the four right efforts all the way to the eighteen unshared dharmas and the thirty-two marks, and stops at the end with the passage on 「光明遍照三千大千世界」 tr. "his light illumines all the three-thousand great-thousand world"—the list is long, yet its position is exactly beneath the gift of Dharma: ‘this long string of names and marks is what the bodhisattva is to give to beings’.

The Middle Part speaks of the reasons for gathering. At the opening the treatise-author first asks, on the reader's behalf, a question that seems superfluous: this question of emptiness and of good and evil has already been asked many times before; why is it asked again? His answer is fourfold in all; the first, 「是事上已答」 tr. "this matter has already been answered above", points back to the preceding chapter, and the three below it are: first, 「眾生從無始生死已來著心深難解故,須菩提復作是重問」 tr. "because beings, from beginningless birth and death onward, have a clinging mind that is deep and hard to undo, Subhūti asks this repeated question once more"; second, 「是般若波羅蜜欲說是空,義要故,數問」 tr. "what this prajñāpāramitā wishes to speak is this emptiness; because the meaning is essential, he asks again and again"; third, where the compassionate mind shows most—「佛滅度五百年後,像法中眾生愛著佛法,墮著法中」 tr. "five hundred years after the Buddha's passing into extinction, beings in the semblance Dharma love and cling to the Buddha's Dharma and fall into clinging to dharmas", and so, out of pity, he makes it clear again. The use of the two emptinesses the treatise-author also settles here in one sentence: 「畢竟空破諸法;無始空破眾生相」 tr. "ultimate emptiness breaks dharmas; beginningless emptiness breaks the mark of beings". Below this he explains the sūtra item by item. Giving, keeping morality, and meditative concentration are taught alike and were spoken of in the earlier text; what is different here? 「先說生身菩薩,今說變化身。先說一國土,今說無量世界。」 tr. "What was spoken of before was the bodhisattva in a fleshly body; what is spoken of now is the transformation body. What was spoken of before was one land; what is spoken of now is immeasurable worlds." How can the Buddha be made level with animals? It is not making light of the Buddha; it is cultivating the mind of ultimate emptiness toward all dharmas, and so 「是故知一切法畢竟空故,不輕畜生,不著心貴佛」 tr. "therefore, knowing that all dharmas are ultimately empty, he does not hold animals in contempt, and does not with a clinging mind prize the Buddha"; and the treatise-author at once adds a further layer, lest people misread this as mixing good and evil together—「菩薩有二法門:一者、畢竟空法門,二者、分別好惡法門」 tr. "The bodhisattva has two dharma-gates: first, the dharma-gate of ultimate emptiness; second, the dharma-gate of distinguishing the good and the bad": entering the gate of emptiness, he contemplates all equally; entering the gate of distinguishing, even the arhat and the pratyekabuddha do not come up to the Buddha, how much less animals. Where the ancient treatise's way of recording side by side without judgement shows most is the item on being cut and severed: 「菩薩身非木石,云何眾生來割截而不生異心?」 tr. "The bodhisattva's body is not wood or stone; how is it that when beings come and cut and sever it, he does not give rise to a different mind?" The treatise-author sets out four sayings and does not rule among them: one says, 「菩薩久修羼提波羅蜜故,能不愁惱;如羼提仙人被截手足,血皆為乳」 tr. "because the bodhisattva has long cultivated kṣāntipāramitā, he can be without sorrow and vexation; just as when the sage Kṣānti had his hands and feet cut off, his blood all became milk"; one says that he has long cultivated kindness and compassion, 「譬如草木無有瞋心」 tr. "just as grass and trees have no mind of anger"; one says that, having obtained the empty mind that is the retribution of prajñā, his mind does not move; one says, 「是菩薩非生死身,是出三界法性生身」 tr. "this bodhisattva's body is not a body of birth and death; it is the body born of the dharma-nature that has gone beyond the three realms". Since he can enter the hells and deliver beings, why are the three evil destinies not emptied? The answer is that beings are many times more numerous, and he delivers them according to the causes and conditions of those who can be delivered, 「譬如大赦,及者得脫,不及者則不蒙」 tr. "It is as a great amnesty: those it reaches are freed, those it does not reach receive nothing". Those who eat the bodhisattva's flesh ought to have sin; why are they instead delivered? The answer lies in the bodhisattva's original vow—「若有眾生噉我肉者,當令得度」 tr. "If there are beings who eat my flesh, may they come to be delivered"—and the treatise-author makes a special point of showing where cause and fruit lie: 「非以噉肉故得度,以起發慈心故,得免畜生,生善處,值佛得度」 tr. "It is not because of eating the flesh that they are delivered; it is because of the kind mind that is roused that they can escape from the animal destiny, be born in a good place, meet a Buddha, and be delivered". Why is the human destiny alone spoken of broadly? Because 「三惡道中苦多故,眾生少疑」 tr. "within the three evil destinies there is much suffering, beings have little doubt"; the gods have the divine eye and see sin and merit for themselves; only humans 「以肉眼不見罪福因緣果報,又多著外道邪師及邪見經書」 tr. "with the fleshly eye do not see the causes, conditions, and retributions of sin and merit, and moreover many cling to the wrong teachers of the outside paths and to the scriptures of wrong views". Why, among the four means of gathering, is only giving spoken of broadly? 「布施中攝三事故」 tr. "Because giving contains the three things"—raising one gives the pattern for the other three. Why, within giving, is the gift of Dharma again spoken of broadly? 「財施少,法施廣故」 tr. "Because the gift of wealth is little and the gift of Dharma is broad"—「財施,有量果報;法施,無量果報」 tr. "the gift of wealth has a measured retribution; the gift of Dharma has an immeasurable retribution", 「財施,能與三界富樂;法施,能與涅槃常樂」 tr. "the gift of wealth can give the riches and pleasures of the three realms; the gift of Dharma can give the constant pleasure of nirvāṇa". Why must Subhūti ask whether the bodhisattva obtains the omniscience of all kinds? The treatise-author sees that this is a question that leaves no way forward or back, and answers it by time and position: 「今得一切種智,名為菩薩;已得一切種智,名為佛」 tr. "now obtaining the omniscience of all kinds, he is named bodhisattva; having already obtained the omniscience of all kinds, he is named Buddha". The nine successive absorptions, the thirty-two marks, and the eighty minor marks are originally held in common by the world; why are they called world-transcending and unshared? The answer has two parts: 「滅受定,但聖人能得」 tr. "the absorption of the cessation of feeling only sages can obtain"; and as for the marks and minor signs being the same as the wheel-turning sage king's, 「名字雖同,而威德、具足、淨潔、得處則不同於佛」 tr. "though the names are the same, in majesty, completeness, purity, and the place of their obtaining they are not the same as the Buddha's". Why, when the whole treatise is about to close, are the marks and minor signs only then spoken of? Because 「佛有二種身:法身、生身」 tr. "the Buddha has two kinds of body: the Dharma body and the fleshly body": the Dharma body benefits more, so it is spoken of broadly first; the marks and minor signs of the fleshly body are the retribution of what is without outflows, so they are placed at the end. Why are the ten powers only ten? 「佛實有無量智力,但以眾生不能得、不能行故不說」 tr. "The Buddha truly has immeasurable powers of knowledge; only because beings cannot obtain them and cannot practise them, they are not spoken of"—the ten powers are the ten kinds by which the matter of delivering beings who can be delivered can be accomplished, so the treatise-author takes the physician as a simile: 「譬如良醫,觀其病相,審定知其可活則治之,不可活者則捨之」 tr. "it is as a good physician observes the marks of the sickness and, judging and knowing for certain that the patient can live, treats him, and where he cannot live, gives him up". Below this he distinguishes nature from desire, in words extremely brief and extremely discerning: 「性在內,欲在外。性重,欲輕。性難除,欲易捨。性深,欲淺。」 tr. "Nature is within, desire is without. Nature is heavy, desire is light. Nature is hard to remove, desire is easy to give up. Nature is deep, desire is shallow."; distinguishing the power of the paths leading everywhere from the divine eye, he says, 「天眼但見生死時」 tr. "the divine eye sees only the time of birth and death", while this power also knows cause and fruit before death; distinguishing why the last three powers belong to the Buddha alone, he returns to one sentence—「是故說法,初無空言」 tr. "therefore his teaching of the Dharma has never been empty words". At the end of the Middle Part there is once more a setting side by side without judgement: why does the Buddha's body have the thirty-two marks exactly as the wheel-turning sage king does? One saying is, 「三十二相不多不少,義如先說」 tr. "the thirty-two marks are neither more nor fewer; the meaning is as explained before"; one saying is that the marks are not fixed, 「隨眾生所好,可以引導其心者為現」 tr. "according to what beings like, whatever can lead their minds, that he shows for them"; one saying is, 「此三十二相實定,以神通力變化身,隨眾生所好而為現相」 tr. "these thirty-two marks are really fixed; by the power of supernormal powers he transforms his body and, according to what beings like, shows the marks for them"; one saying is, 「佛有時神通變化,有時隨世界處生,當生處不得言神通變化」 tr. "the Buddha is sometimes a supernormal transformation, and sometimes is born according to the place in the world; where he is born, it cannot be said to be a supernormal transformation", and this last saying further cites a sūtra by way of illustration: 「或現金色、或現銀色、或日月星宿色,或長、或短,隨可引導眾生則為現相」 tr. "he shows a golden colour, or shows a silver colour, or the colour of the sun, the moon, and the stars, long or short; according to the beings who can be led, he shows marks for them".

The Last Part turns from gathering to the one who teaches the Dharma himself. Fascicle eighty-nine starts again with the title continued as 「之餘」 tr. "the remainder"; the sūtra text first lists the eighty minor marks item by item to the end, closing with 「是八十隨形好,佛身成就」 tr. "these eighty minor marks are what the Buddha's body accomplishes"; then the remaining three things of the four means of gathering are each closed with one sentence—kind speech is 「菩薩摩訶薩以六波羅蜜為眾生說法」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva teaches the Dharma for beings by the six perfections", beneficial action is 「菩薩摩訶薩長夜教眾生,令行六波羅蜜」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva through the long night teaches beings and makes them practise the six perfections", shared endeavour is 「菩薩摩訶薩以五神通力故種種變化,入五道中,與眾生同事」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, by the power of the five supernormal powers, transforms himself in all kinds of ways, enters the five destinies, and shares in endeavour with beings". With the four means of gathering closed, the sūtra text turns into the forty-two gates of letters: 「一字皆入四十二字,四十二字亦入一字」 tr. "one letter enters all forty-two letters, and forty-two letters also enter one letter", and their sequence has an end and a beginning—「善學四十二字已,能善說字法;善說字法已,善說無字法」 tr. "having trained well in the forty-two letters, they can speak well of the dharma of letters; having spoken well of the dharma of letters, they speak well of the dharma without letters", the last sentence weighing most: 「過一切名字故,名為佛法」 tr. "Because it passes beyond all names and letters, it is named the Buddha's Dharma". At this point Subhūti raises the tightest objection of the whole chapter: beings are unfindable, dharmas are unfindable, the nature of dharmas is unfindable, the six perfections and so on up to the eighty minor marks are all unfindable, so 「菩薩尚不可得,何況當有菩薩法!」 tr. "The bodhisattva is unfindable, how much less should there be the dharmas of a bodhisattva!"—that being so, who is it that teaches the Dharma, and to whom? The Buddha's answer does not evade; first he empties out the eighteen emptinesses and all the gates of dharma one by one, and then gives a posture that falls on neither side: the bodhisattva, 「如是見一切法空,為眾生說法,不失諸空相」 tr. "thus seeing all dharmas as empty, teaches the Dharma for beings and does not lose the marks of the emptinesses". How can he not lose them? By the simile of the conjured person: a person conjured by the Buddha further conjures immeasurable people and teaches them giving and keeping morality, and 「是化人無心、無心數法,云何分別破壞諸法?」 tr. "this conjured person is without mind and without mental-factor dharmas; how could he discriminate and destroy dharmas?"—he speaks without the mind of one who speaks, and so his speaking does not destroy dharmas. Below this he speaks of the real mark of those who are pulled out: 「是色不縛不脫,受、想、行、識不縛不脫」 tr. "This form is neither bound nor liberated; feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness are neither bound nor liberated"; and he speaks of the non-abiding of the one who speaks: 「無所有法不住無所有法,所有法不住所有法,自性法不住自性法,他性法不住他性法」 tr. "the dharma without anything existent does not abide in the dharma without anything existent; the existent dharma does not abide in the existent dharma; the dharma of self-nature does not abide in the dharma of self-nature; the dharma of other-nature does not abide in the dharma of other-nature". Since 「色不異法性、不異如、不異實際」 tr. "form does not differ from the nature of dharmas, does not differ from suchness, does not differ from the limit of reality", why still distinguish the black and white retributions of deeds and the four fruits of the śramaṇa? The Buddha's answer stands on the two truths: 「世諦故,分別說有果報,非第一義;第一義中不可說因緣果報」 tr. "By reason of worldly truth, retribution is spoken of with distinctions; it is not the highest meaning. Within the highest meaning, causes and conditions and retribution are unspeakable". Subhūti, taking this opening, presses one step further—if within the highest meaning there is no discrimination, should ordinary people not then have the noble fruits? The Buddha's way of breaking it is extremely sharp: he only asks in return whether ordinary people know the two truths: 「以凡夫人實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果,云何當有諸果?」 tr. "Because ordinary people really do not know worldly truth, do not know the truth of the highest meaning, do not know the path, and do not know how to distinguish the fruits of the path, how should they have the fruits?"; conversely, 「聖人知世諦、知第一義諦,有道、有修道,以是故聖人差別有諸果」 tr. "the sages know worldly truth and know the truth of the highest meaning; they have the path and have the cultivation of the path; for this reason the sages have the various fruits with distinctions". Asked again whether cultivating the path one obtains the fruit, the Buddha blocks all four alternatives: 「修道不得果,不修道亦不得果,亦不離道得果,亦不住道中得果」 tr. "Cultivating the path, one does not obtain the fruit; not cultivating the path, one does not obtain the fruit either; nor does one obtain the fruit apart from the path; nor does one obtain the fruit abiding within the path". And then, with a string of questions in return, the Buddha draws out Subhūti's own answer: are the fruits conditioned or unconditioned? He answers, 「皆是無為!」 tr. "They are all unconditioned!"; within the unconditioned is there distinction? He answers, Not so; when one penetrates all dharmas as one mark, is there distinction? He answers, Not so—and the objection disperses of itself. Treatise ② here first adds explanations of two small items: why is 「識滿足」 tr. "consciousness full", among the eighty minor marks, listed among the marks of the body? Because 「此識是果報生識,世間好醜自然而知」 tr. "this consciousness is a consciousness born of retribution, which knows of itself the fair and the foul of the world"; how is 「住處安」 tr. "secure in his dwelling-place" to be understood? 「住處安者,如白衣勇士,牢持器仗,安據住處,則不可動」 tr. "Secure in his dwelling-place is like a white-robed warrior who, firmly holding his weapons, securely occupies his dwelling-place and cannot be moved". Next it explains the gates of letters and returns them to one sentence—「無字即是諸法實相義」 tr. "being without letters is precisely the meaning of the real mark of all dharmas", the reason lying in 「諸法義中,諸法無名字」 tr. "within the meaning of dharmas, dharmas have no names or letters". Next it distinguishes three ways in which the one who teaches the Dharma loses: to make all dharmas empty while what is said is not empty is the first losing; 「若以所說不空,則為失空相」 tr. "if he holds that what is said is not empty, then that is losing the mark of emptiness" is the second; the mouth speaking emptiness while the mind holds existence is the third—「若口說空而心是有,是亦為失」 tr. "if the mouth says emptiness while in the mind there is existence, this too is losing"; the meaning of non-abiding it makes clear by three similes: 「譬如虛空不住虛空」 tr. "It is as space does not abide in space", 「譬如火不住火中」 tr. "It is as fire does not abide within fire", 「譬如水性中無火性」 tr. "It is as within the nature of water there is no nature of fire". Next it sets itself a question: 「此中何以但說二空名為法?」 tr. "Why, here, are only two emptinesses spoken of as named the Dharma?" The answer is that what exists is only the two matters, dharmas and beings: 「若言畢竟空,則破諸法;若言無始空,則破眾生」 tr. "if ultimate emptiness is spoken of, dharmas are broken; if beginningless emptiness is spoken of, beings are broken", and the reason ultimate emptiness alone is taken is that 「餘空如火燒木,猶有灰燼;畢竟空無灰無燼」 tr. "the other emptinesses are like fire burning wood, which still leaves ashes and embers; ultimate emptiness is without ashes and without embers"—below which a differing saying is still kept without judgement: 「若說十八空無咎,略說故說二空」 tr. "even if the eighteen emptinesses were spoken of, there would be no fault; it is because it is spoken of in brief that two emptinesses are spoken of". The last great passage most deserves close reading: the treatise-author judges Subhūti's objection to have arisen from a clinging mind—「今須菩提以著心問,欲從道中出果,如麻中出油」 tr. "now Subhūti asks with a clinging mind, wishing to take the fruit out from within the path, as oil is taken out from sesame"; fearing, too, that the hearers will in turn cling to not cultivating, he blocks it at once: 「修尚不得,何況不修!」 tr. "Even cultivating, it is not obtained, how much less without cultivating!", and gives the simile of two people who do not arrive: 「譬如二人欲有所到:一者、住,不行;二者、失道。二俱不到。」 tr. "It is as two people who wish to reach somewhere: one stays and does not go; the second loses the road. Neither of the two arrives."; at the end he points out that only the mind at the time of realisation is true and real—「唯是心為真實,餘時皆虛誑」 tr. "only this mind is true and real; at other times all is false and deceptive". The whole chapter ends with one sentence of posture: 「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中;於法性中不疑、不悶而說法,無罣、無礙、無遮,是則通達法性。」 tr. "One who thoroughly penetrates does not grasp at the mark of the nature of dharmas and does not abide within the nature of dharmas; within the nature of dharmas he teaches the Dharma without doubt and without oppression, without hindrance, without obstruction, without blocking: this is to penetrate the nature of dharmas."

The difference among the three parts of the arc can be settled in one word: the First Part speaks of the matters of gathering, the Middle Part speaks of the reasons for gathering, the Last Part speaks of the non-abiding of the one who gathers. The First Part gives item after item—giving wealth, giving Dharma, giving the body, giving the long list of names and marks; the Middle Part pursues question after question—of one and the same matter, asking by what it can be accomplished; the Last Part sweeps round after round—sweeping until even the one who teaches the Dharma himself is not allowed to stand. And through the three parts runs one thread, namely the three Chinese characters 「不分別」 tr. "without discrimination": not discriminating in the First Part is not discriminating between a field of merit and what is not a field of merit, between whom he should give to and whom he should not; not discriminating in the Middle Part is not holding animals in contempt and not with a clinging mind prizing the Buddha, while at the same time not abandoning the gate of distinguishing the good and the bad; not discriminating in the Last Part is teaching the Dharma for beings without discriminating dharmas and without grasping at the mark of the nature of dharmas. The reason the four means of gathering can be accomplished is precisely that the one who gathers does not abide in his gathering; if he abides, then giving becomes selective giving, teaching the Dharma becomes clinging to the Dharma, and at the last even the nature of dharmas becomes a place in which one can abide. The chapter's name is set on 「四攝」 tr. "the four means of gathering", and its end returns to 「通達法性」 tr. "penetrating the nature of dharmas"; the meaning of the whole chapter lies entirely between this one going out and this one return.

Therefore, in reading each passage of this chapter, one can ask at least three layers of questions. First, is what this passage speaks of a matter of what is given, or of the posture of giving—the places where the sūtra text lists marks and items at greatest length all stand beneath the gift of Dharma, which shows that the long list is not embellishment but an inventory; and beyond the inventory, the phrase 「等一布施」 tr. "one and the same giving" is the standard. Whenever one feels one has already practised giving, first ask about the thing given, then ask whether at the time of giving there was a mind that picks and chooses; the treatise-author says it plainly: the sickness of picking and choosing lies not in distinguishing clearly, but in not giving once one has distinguished. Second, if this passage were turned against its purpose, what would it become—the danger of this chapter lies wholly in the Chinese character 「空」 tr. "emptiness": speaking of emptiness and not giving, speaking of not discriminating and making light of good and evil, speaking of nothing to be attained and abandoning the cultivation of the path. The treatise-author has blocked all three of these misuses: setting up, beyond ultimate emptiness, a separate dharma-gate of distinguishing the good and the bad blocks the second; 「修尚不得,何況不修!」 tr. "Even cultivating, it is not obtained, how much less without cultivating!" blocks the third; and the first is blocked earliest—the first of the four means of gathering is giving, and the first use of emptiness is being able to give up, not being able to push away. Third, what I am now not strong enough to reach—of what use is this chapter to me—the Last Part is set up exactly for this. The eighty minor marks and the ten powers I cannot learn; but 「不失諸空相」 tr. "does not lose the marks of the emptinesses" and 「不取法性相」 tr. "does not grasp at the mark of the nature of dharmas" can be used anywhere: when teaching the Dharma, not setting oneself up as the one who speaks is not grasping; when praised by others, not taking it that one has really attained anything is not abiding. Reading on along the two sūtras and two treatises, one will come at last to rest on that simile of the treatise-author—one who seeks the fruit with a clinging mind is 「如麻中出油」 tr. "as oil is taken out from sesame", thinking that within the path there is a fruit that can be pressed out; and what the end of the whole chapter grants is no more than an unobstructedness at the time of teaching the Dharma: 「於法性中不疑、不悶而說法」 tr. "within the nature of dharmas he teaches the Dharma without doubt and without oppression". Without doubt does not mean already realised; it means not raising, at the time of speaking, another thought to doubt. Without oppression does not mean without difficulty; it means the difficulty does not become an obstruction. The practice of gathering beings has a thousand heads and ten thousand threads; where it comes to rest is only this one sentence.

Reading On in the Order of the Treatise

本品 3 葉Chapter contents · 3
  1. 78-01四攝品之上The Four Means of Gathering, Part 1 of 3四攝品之上:須菩提問夢響影焰幻化無實事無所有性自相空中云何分別善不善世間出世間有漏無漏有為無為乃至四果辟支佛道阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,佛答凡夫愚人於夢化中猶起身口意三業、菩薩住畢竟空無始空為眾生說陰入界空而以方便力於慳中拔出次第安置無餘涅槃及涅槃道中;須菩提讚歎菩薩甚希有難及、佛許說聲聞辟支佛所無之希有難及法;住報得六波羅蜜五神通三十七助道法諸陀羅尼諸無礙智到十方世界隨所應而攝取;布施饒益眾生之等一布施、福田非福田分別想非菩薩法、乞身體支節不生二心、畢竟空中誰與誰受所施何物而住諸空具足檀波羅蜜;佛眼所見十方菩薩入大地獄令火滅湯冷三事教化、為諸佛給使終不忘失、為畜生捨壽命割截身體、除餓鬼飢渴苦、六欲天上說法示現火起燒宮殿、令諸梵天遠離邪見;四事攝取之布施愛語利益同事、布施攝取之財施法施、財施之所施物與所教法、法施之世間出世間二種、聖無漏法與聖無漏法果;須菩提問菩薩得一切種智不與菩薩與佛有何等異;出世間不共凡夫法逐項——四念處四正勤四如意足五根五力七覺分八聖道分三三昧八背捨九次第定佛十力四無所畏四無礙智十八不共法三十二相,末以光明遍照三千大千世界與佛音聲遍滿收(經①)卷88
  2. 78-02四攝品之中The Four Means of Gathering, Part 2 of 3四攝品之中:論主釋前段經文——須菩提何以品品重問性空、凡夫於夢化中猶起三業與菩薩住二空之說法、方便力於顛倒中拔出眾生而次第捨離布施持戒禪定、經中已教布施持戒禪定今復更說之異在生身變化身與一國土無量世界、菩薩以般若力於一切法無分別故能令佛與畜生等、菩薩身非木石而割截不生異心之四說、菩薩無量而三惡道不盡空之故、眾生割截食肉而反得度之本願與毘摩羅鞊經香飯之喻、法華經藥王菩薩以身為燈之例、何以略說餘四道而廣說人道、四攝之中何以多說布施、布施之中何以廣說法施、須菩提何以問菩薩得一切種智不、九次第定三十二相八十隨形好何以名為出世間不共法、何以至經欲訖方說相好、佛十力何以但說十力與十力之逐一籌量、眾生利鈍二根與善欲惡欲二性之辨、一切到處道力與天眼力之異、後三力何以唯佛所有而二乘無、佛身何以正與轉輪聖王同有三十二相之四說與密迹經隨好現相(論①)卷88
  3. 78-03四攝品之下The Four Means of Gathering, Part 3 of 3四攝品之下:八十隨形好逐目乃至手足有德相,二施攝取眾生之收束與愛語利行同事三攝,善學一字乃至四十二字而一字入四十二字四十二字入一字、善說字法已善說無字法、過一切名字故名為佛法;須菩提問眾生法法性畢竟不可得云何住報得五神通為眾生說法,佛答眾生不可得故十八空乃至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提空、如是見一切法空為眾生說法而不失諸空相、不壞諸法相不二不分別、佛所化人復化無量人之喻;拔出眾生於顛倒地以不縛不脫法故、色畢竟清淨故;為眾生說法亦不得眾生及一切法、無所有法不住無所有法自性法不住自性法、於諸佛及聲聞辟支佛無有過;色與法性如實際異不、云何分別黑法黑報白法白報、世諦故分別說有果報非第一義、凡夫人應有須陀洹果之難與凡夫實不知世諦不知第一義諦之答、修道得果不之四句俱不、三結盡名須陀洹果等云何知不分別有為無為得諸果、諸果皆是無為而無為法中無分別、通達一切法一相所謂無相、自得無所著亦教人令得無所著如佛所化人布施不受報(經②);論主釋識滿足何以在隨形好中、足安立住處與安住處何異、四十二字義之一字盡入諸字與四十二字入一字、善知字故善知諸法名義而無字即是諸法實相義、須菩提問畢竟空無名字云何說法與佛可其問、不失於空而為說法之三失、方便說法無咎與第一義中無縛無解世諦故有縛有解、無所有法不住無所有之三喻、清淨說法於諸佛賢聖無有過、色等諸法與法性異不與何以但貴法性、得第一義聖人無所分別、此中何以但說二空名為法與火燒木之喻、須菩提凡夫應是聖人之難與佛之反破、須菩提自知有失與修道得果不、佛上說得果今云何言不、修尚不得何況不修與二人欲有所到之喻、斷三結得須陀洹之難與佛以反問答、末歸於善通達法性者不取法性相亦不住法性中(論②)卷89
義疏 · 承衍Exposition · Further Resonances

承衍

〈四攝品〉之所承,字面上便看得見。前品〈六喻品〉以須菩提之問開卷——「世尊!云何無相、不可分別、自相空諸法中具足修六波羅蜜」,佛答教人住五陰如夢如響如影如焰如幻如化而於其中行六度,其判語是「若法無自性,是法無相;若法無相,是法一相,所謂無相」,故能「當知菩薩布施無相、施者無相、受者無相」;其論末收於一句對比——「上以一念中能具諸波羅蜜,此以諸法雖空無相而能具諸波羅蜜為異」。本品品題緊接此句之後,而經文第一句便把前品那六個譬喻原樣拈起,只換了一個方向:前品問的是無相中如何自行,本品問的是無相中如何分別善惡以度他。連菩薩之所住亦是前品備好的——前品說「報得名更不修行,自然而得;譬如報得眼根,自然能見色」,本品開口說攝生之本,正作「住報得六波羅蜜中及住報得五神通」。論主自己也明說兩品之問是同一問:本品論①開卷即自設「品品中義無異而作種種名問」之難,而先答一句「是事上已答」,再出三因緣以釋其重問之意。

所啟者亦在本品末句已見端倪。本品終於說法者之姿態——「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中」;次品〈善達品〉開卷第一問即是「世尊!云何菩薩善達諸法相?」,承此「善通達」三字而問其相。而佛之答所用者,又正是本品之喻:本品以佛所化人化作無量人說法而「無心、無心數法」明說法不壞法,次品便逕以化人立其全答——「譬如化人不行婬、怒、癡,不行色乃至識」,乃至「菩薩亦如是,無有是事,亦不分別是法,是名善達諸法相」;又答化人之修道云「化人修道,不垢不淨,亦不在五道生死」。本品之末一大節說字與無字,說「過一切名字故,名為佛法」;次品則順此而說眾生之所繫——「眾生但住名相虛妄憶想分別中」,並釋名之為名曰「一切和合法皆是假名,以名取諸法,是故為名」。本品說名字不足以盡義,次品即從名字說眾生之縛與菩薩之拔,一開一合,其接續之跡逐句可按。

本品品題於諸本所存者,最可誌。本論底本題「大智度論釋四攝品第七十八」十二字;明本作「釋四攝品第七十八之上」十字,缺「大智度論」四字之前綴而增「之上」二字,是明本自以卷界二分本品;宮本作「大智度論釋第七十八品四攝品」十三字,品號與品名之語序互易;石本作「摩訶般若波羅蜜品第七十七四攝品八十九」十八字,其品號作「七十七」,較底本差一階,與前數品聖石諸本一貫。石本又於此處另標「卷第八十九首」——是石本之卷次以品界為界,其所稱之卷第八十九,正當底本卷第八十八之中,兩本分卷各成一系,並存不判。卷八十九續題作「大智度論釋四攝品第七十八之餘」而繫夾註「卷八十九」,用「之餘」而不用「之下」,與跨卷諸品同型。所釋大經之傳本,本品居其卷第二十四;而宋、元、明、宮四本於其中別立一分卷,續題作「摩訶般若波羅蜜經卷第二十七,四攝品第七十八之餘云」——經論兩造之分卷點落處各不相同,同一品而各自為界,屬傳承層之異,如實誌之。凡此諸異,皆不涉本品一字之義理,而各本之卷次一望可知其不同,故並錄以備讀者對勘。

古德讀此品者三家,所存各異其體。吉藏《大品經義疏》有專章逐段科釋,其品位總判最見識力——「此下第二明外化方便。前是內行方便,亦前是自行」,而下句逕接「今是化他,由內行滿足故能外益生」,以本品為一部大經自行轉化他之關捩;其科又以三品為一組:「第一此品明菩薩為化道無方巧化非一,第二善達品明為化之能,第三實際品明為化之意」,本品居首。品內則判為二:「初品為二:第一明菩薩化攝無邊為益無量,第二明菩薩雖能廣利不存化功」——後一分之名,正可作本品末節不取法性相之科目。其繫前後品之問亦與論主平行:「上品末問與今問同。上品末答明無所有破病,今品答明法雖無所有於凡夫有也」。於平等施一節,吉藏開得比論主更細:其科作「初、正明平等施為得;次、明簡擇施為失」,而隨即補一層以防死執——「須知簡擇不簡擇但得失安,無明無知心中簡擇不簡擇但失」,意謂有方便者簡擇與不簡擇俱得,無方便者俱失,得失不繫於簡擇之形。相好二問與論主所設兩問全合:「問:三十二相云何是出世間法?答:此是無漏果無漏業日起」;釋種智之難則作「當得種智名菩薩,已得種智名佛也」,與論主「今得一切種智,名為菩薩」之答同軌。其釋字門云「四十二字入一字,論四十二字皆有阿分,故入阿中也」——明言「論」,是逕引本論論②之文以釋經,相承之跡逐字可按。至二諦一難,吉藏自陳與「由來諸大師」異:諸師判須菩提就世諦作難,吉藏判其就第一義作難,末歸於「佛答:凡夫不知二諦,不語二諦也」,並釋何以獨標初果——「須陀洹是聖始,故標初為言也」。此外其書另有兩處於品外提及本品:釋經卷次時云「論十八卷及釋四攝品云三事,謂神通、知他心說法也」,正是本品佛眼所見入地獄度生之三事;釋〈道樹品〉時又云「第二從四攝品以下,明化他行」,與其本品之總判前後自相照應。

釋本論之古疏唯慧影《大智度論疏》一家,而其書殘闕,現存止於品六十九之中,本品逐文之釋闕——闕者不記為零命中,如實標闕。惟其全書另有兩處提及本品,皆可誌。其一為科判:「第二從四攝品去於化品有十品經,明菩薩外化方便」,而慧影自繫其所本為苻姚時諸法師之舊科——是則『本品為外化方便一段之首』一判,吉藏與慧影異書異時而同軌,且其源出羅什譯場同時諸師,此為本品科判層最堅之一證。其二為名相之問:「問:依下句義品及四攝品,經云皆是出世間法,何故唯言為別無色定」——所徵者正是本品出世間不共凡夫法之列目,可見慧影雖未及疏本品,讀本論時已以本品之文為據。均正《大乘四論玄義》則存括略引一條:「故大品經二十四卷四攝品云:佛告須菩提:凡夫實不知世諦,不知第一義,不知中道,不知分別道果,云何當有諸道不等也」;其所繫卷次與所釋經相合,知其所引為經而非論。逐字對勘,此引省一「人」字、易「第一義諦」為「第一義」、易「諸果」為「諸道不等」,且於「不知道」之位插入「不知中道」一語——而「中道」二字,本論與所釋經此段前後皆無。其上文正論中道與佛性,故此語當是均正自身詮釋之詞而非誤引底本,誌錄不判。至天台一系之止觀、玄義、釋籤、文句與注維摩諸書,遍檢「四攝品」之目皆〔查無〕,不強牽合,如實誌之。

把這一路承衍帶回本品,古德之所共見與本品之骨正是一事:四攝是轉身之處。前此諸品所說多是自行——無相中如何具足六度,空中如何不取證;自本品起,同一個空要拿去面對眾生。所以本品之難,從來不是「空不空」,是『空了還給不給』。吉藏判本品為外化之首而又以「雖能廣利不存化功」為其後半,慧影所傳苻姚舊科亦逕稱「外化方便」,兩家所見同在此一處:外化是能廣利,方便是不存功。本品自身給的驗法亦正是兩面。一面在給:我自以為已行布施時,先問所施是物而止,還是「財施已,後教令得無上安隱涅槃」;我自以為已無分別時,先問是否真能「若供養佛、辟支佛、阿羅漢、阿那含、斯陀含、須陀洹等無有異」而下至禽獸「等一布施」,抑或只是心裡不分而手上仍簡擇。一面在不住:我說法時,記得本品判說法者之三失——作諸法皆空而所說不空是失,「若口說空而心是有,是亦為失」;我有所得時,記得論主判著心求果者「如麻中出油」;我因此怯而不修時,記得那一句堵回來的話——「修尚不得,何況不修!」。全品說盡了攝生之事與攝生之所以,末後所留下的,不過是說法時的一種身分——「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中;於法性中不疑、不悶而說法,無罣、無礙、無遮,是則通達法性。」攝而不住其攝,說而不住其說,四攝之義盡於此。

Further Resonances

What "The Four Means of Gathering" inherits can be seen on the very surface of the words. The preceding chapter, "The Six Similes," opens with Subhūti's question—「世尊!云何無相、不可分別、自相空諸法中具足修六波羅蜜」 tr. "World-Honored One! How, within dharmas that are signless, indiscriminable, and empty of specific marks, does one make complete the cultivation of the six perfections"—and the Buddha's answer teaches one to abide in the five aggregates as like a dream, like an echo, like a shadow, like a mirage, like an illusion, like a conjuration, and within them to practise the six perfections; its verdict is 「若法無自性,是法無相;若法無相,是法一相,所謂無相」 tr. "If a dharma has no self-nature, that dharma is signless; if a dharma is signless, that dharma is of one mark, namely signlessness," and therefore it can say 「當知菩薩布施無相、施者無相、受者無相」 tr. "know that the bodhisattva's giving is signless, the giver is signless, the recipient is signless"; its treatise section closes on a single contrast—「上以一念中能具諸波羅蜜,此以諸法雖空無相而能具諸波羅蜜為異」 tr. "Above, it is that within a single thought one can be complete with all the pāramitā; here, it is that though dharmas are empty and signless one can be complete with all the pāramitā—this is the difference." This chapter's title follows directly upon that sentence, and the first sentence of its sūtra text takes up those six similes of the preceding chapter just as they were, changing only the direction: the preceding chapter asks how, within signlessness, one practises oneself; this chapter asks how, within signlessness, good and evil are distinguished so as to deliver others. Even where the bodhisattva abides was made ready by the preceding chapter—the preceding chapter says 「報得名更不修行,自然而得;譬如報得眼根,自然能見色」 tr. "obtained as retribution means obtained of itself without further cultivation; it is as the eye-faculty obtained as retribution can of itself see forms," and this chapter, opening its mouth on the root of gathering beings, says precisely 「住報得六波羅蜜中及住報得五神通」 tr. "abides in the six perfections obtained as retribution and abides in the five supernormal powers obtained as retribution." The treatise-author himself also states plainly that the questions of the two chapters are one and the same question: at the opening of this chapter's Treatise ① he sets up for himself the difficulty 「品品中義無異而作種種名問」 tr. "in chapter after chapter where the meaning has no difference, he still asks under all kinds of names," first answers with one sentence, 「是事上已答」 tr. "this matter has already been answered above," and then brings out three causes and conditions to explain the intent of the repeated question.

What it opens is likewise already glimpsed in this chapter's last sentence. This chapter ends on the posture of the one who teaches the Dharma—「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中」 tr. "One who thoroughly penetrates does not grasp at the mark of the nature of dharmas and does not abide within the nature of dharmas"; the very first question at the opening of the next chapter, "Thorough Penetration," is 「世尊!云何菩薩善達諸法相?」 tr. "World-Honored One! How does the bodhisattva thoroughly penetrate the marks of dharmas?", taking up these three Chinese characters 「善通達」 tr. "thoroughly penetrates" and asking about their marks. And what the Buddha's answer uses is again precisely this chapter's simile: this chapter, by a person conjured by the Buddha who conjures immeasurable people and teaches them the Dharma while being 「無心、無心數法」 tr. "without mind and without mental-factor dharmas," makes clear that teaching the Dharma does not destroy dharmas; the next chapter then sets up its whole answer directly on the conjured person—「譬如化人不行婬、怒、癡,不行色乃至識」 tr. "It is as a conjured person does not practise lust, anger, and delusion, does not practise form and so on up to consciousness," and so on up to 「菩薩亦如是,無有是事,亦不分別是法,是名善達諸法相」 tr. "the bodhisattva too is like this: there is no such matter, nor does he discriminate these dharmas; this is named thoroughly penetrating the marks of dharmas"; and answering on the conjured person's cultivating of the path, it says 「化人修道,不垢不淨,亦不在五道生死」 tr. "The conjured person cultivates the path, neither stained nor pure, nor is he within the birth and death of the five destinies." The last great section of this chapter speaks of letters and of being without letters, saying 「過一切名字故,名為佛法」 tr. "Because it passes beyond all names and letters, it is named the Buddha's Dharma"; the next chapter, following this, speaks of what beings are bound to—「眾生但住名相虛妄憶想分別中」 tr. "beings abide only within names and marks and the false recollection, imagining, and discrimination"—and explains what makes a name a name, saying 「一切和合法皆是假名,以名取諸法,是故為名」 tr. "All dharmas of coming together are provisional names; by the name one takes dharmas, therefore it is a name." This chapter says that names and letters do not suffice to exhaust the meaning; the next chapter, starting from names and letters, speaks of the bondage of beings and the bodhisattva's pulling them out—one opening and one closing—and the traces of their continuity can be examined sentence by sentence.

What the various editions preserve of this chapter's title is most worth recording. The base text of this treatise heads it 「大智度論釋四攝品第七十八」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Explanation of ‘The Four Means of Gathering’, Chapter Seventy-eight," twelve Chinese characters; the Ming edition reads 「釋四攝品第七十八之上」 tr. "Explanation of ‘The Four Means of Gathering’, Chapter Seventy-eight, First Part," ten Chinese characters, lacking the prefix of the four Chinese characters 「大智度論」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa" and adding the two Chinese characters 「之上」 tr. "First Part"—that is, the Ming edition itself divides this chapter in two at the fascicle boundary; the Palace edition reads 「大智度論釋第七十八品四攝品」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Explanation of the Seventy-eighth Chapter, the Four Means of Gathering Chapter," thirteen Chinese characters, the order of chapter number and chapter name being exchanged; the Ishiyama-dera manuscript reads 「摩訶般若波羅蜜品第七十七四攝品八十九」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā, Chapter the Seventy-seventh, the Four Means of Gathering Chapter, Eighty-nine," eighteen Chinese characters, its chapter number being 「七十七」 tr. "seventy-seven," one step off from the base text, consistently with the Shōgozō and Ishiyama-dera manuscripts in the preceding several chapters. The Ishiyama-dera manuscript further marks at this place 「卷第八十九首」 tr. "head of Fascicle Eighty-nine"—that is, the Ishiyama-dera manuscript's fascicle order takes the chapter boundary as its boundary, and what it calls Fascicle Eighty-nine falls precisely within Fascicle Eighty-eight of the base text; the two texts each form a system of their own in dividing fascicles, and both are kept without judgement. The continuation title of fascicle eighty-nine reads 「大智度論釋四攝品第七十八之餘」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Explanation of ‘The Four Means of Gathering’, Chapter Seventy-eight, the Remainder," with the interlinear note 「卷八十九」 tr. "Fascicle Eighty-nine" attached; it uses 「之餘」 tr. "the remainder" and not 「之下」 tr. "Last Part," the same pattern as the chapters that cross fascicles. In the transmitted text of the great sūtra being explained, this chapter lies in its Fascicle Twenty-four; yet the four editions—Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace—set up a separate fascicle division within it, the continuation title reading 「摩訶般若波羅蜜經卷第二十七,四攝品第七十八之餘云」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, Fascicle Twenty-seven: ‘The Four Means of Gathering’, Chapter Seventy-eight, the remainder; it says"—the points where the fascicle divisions fall differ between the two sides, sūtra and treatise; it is the same chapter, and each draws its own boundary; this belongs to differences at the level of transmission, and is recorded as it is. None of these differences touches the doctrinal meaning of a single character of this chapter, yet the difference in fascicle order among the various editions can be seen at a glance, and so they are all recorded together for the reader's collation.

Three of the ancient masters read this chapter, and what survives of each differs in form. Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra has a dedicated section dividing and explaining passage by passage, and its overall judgement of the chapter's position shows the most insight—「此下第二明外化方便。前是內行方便,亦前是自行」 tr. "From here down, second, the skilful means of transforming outwardly is made clear. The preceding was the skilful means of inner practice; also, the preceding was one's own practice"—with the next sentence joining on directly, 「今是化他,由內行滿足故能外益生」 tr. "now it is transforming others; because inner practice is complete, one can benefit the living outwardly," taking this chapter as the hinge on which the whole great sūtra turns from one's own practice to transforming others; his division further takes three chapters as one group: 「第一此品明菩薩為化道無方巧化非一,第二善達品明為化之能,第三實際品明為化之意」 tr. "First, this chapter makes clear that the bodhisattva, for the path of transforming, is without a fixed method, and his skilful transforming is not of one kind; second, the ‘Thorough Penetration’ chapter makes clear the ability to transform; third, the ‘Limit of Reality’ chapter makes clear the intent of transforming," this chapter standing first. Within the chapter he divides it in two: 「初品為二:第一明菩薩化攝無邊為益無量,第二明菩薩雖能廣利不存化功」 tr. "The first chapter is in two: first, it makes clear that the bodhisattva's transforming and gathering are boundless and his benefit immeasurable; second, it makes clear that though the bodhisattva can benefit broadly, he does not keep the merit of transforming"—the name of the latter part can serve exactly as the heading of this chapter's last section, on not grasping at the mark of the nature of dharmas. His linking of the questions of the preceding chapter and this one also runs parallel with the treatise-author: 「上品末問與今問同。上品末答明無所有破病,今品答明法雖無所有於凡夫有也」 tr. "The question at the end of the preceding chapter is the same as the present question. The answer at the end of the preceding chapter makes clear that there is nothing existent, so as to break the sickness; the answer of this chapter makes clear that though dharmas are without anything existent, for ordinary people they exist." On the section on equal giving, Jizang opens it out more finely than the treatise-author: his division reads 「初、正明平等施為得;次、明簡擇施為失」 tr. "first, it properly makes clear that equal giving is a gain; next, it makes clear that picking-and-choosing giving is a loss," and he at once adds a further layer to guard against rigid clinging—「須知簡擇不簡擇但得失安,無明無知心中簡擇不簡擇但失」 tr. "One must know that, picking and choosing or not picking and choosing, it is only a matter of where gain and loss are settled; within a mind of ignorance and not-knowing, picking and choosing or not picking and choosing is only loss"—meaning that one who has skilful means gains whether he picks and chooses or does not, and one without skilful means loses either way: gain and loss are not tied to the outward form of picking and choosing. His two questions on the marks and minor signs wholly accord with the two questions the treatise-author sets up: 「問:三十二相云何是出世間法?答:此是無漏果無漏業日起」 tr. "Question: how are the thirty-two marks world-transcending dharmas? Answer: these are the fruit without outflows, arising daily from deeds without outflows"; on the difficulty about the knowledge of all kinds he writes 「當得種智名菩薩,已得種智名佛也」 tr. "one who is to obtain the knowledge of all kinds is named bodhisattva; one who has obtained the knowledge of all kinds is named Buddha," running on the same track as the treatise-author's answer 「今得一切種智,名為菩薩」 tr. "now obtaining the omniscience of all kinds, he is named bodhisattva." His explanation of the gates of letters says 「四十二字入一字,論四十二字皆有阿分,故入阿中也」 tr. "Forty-two letters enter one letter: the treatise says the forty-two letters all have the share of a, and so they enter into a"—it says 「論」 tr. "the treatise" explicitly, so it directly cites the text of this treatise's Treatise ② to explain the sūtra, and the traces of inheritance can be examined word by word. As for the difficulty on the two truths, Jizang states himself that he differs from 「由來諸大師」 tr. "the great masters hitherto": those masters judge that Subhūti makes his difficulty on worldly truth, while Jizang judges that he makes it on the highest meaning, ending with 「佛答:凡夫不知二諦,不語二諦也」 tr. "The Buddha answers: ordinary people do not know the two truths; it does not speak of the two truths," and explaining why the first fruit alone is raised—「須陀洹是聖始,故標初為言也」 tr. "The srota-āpanna is the beginning of the sages, so the first is raised to speak of it." Beyond this, his book mentions this chapter in two further places outside the chapter: explaining the fascicle order of the sūtra, he says 「論十八卷及釋四攝品云三事,謂神通、知他心說法也」 tr. "The treatise in fascicle eighteen and in explaining ‘The Four Means of Gathering’ chapter speaks of three things, namely supernormal power, knowing others' minds, and teaching the Dharma," which are exactly the three things by which, as the Buddha-eye sees in this chapter, the bodhisattva enters the hells and delivers beings; explaining "The Tree of the Path," he again says 「第二從四攝品以下,明化他行」 tr. "Second, from the ‘Four Means of Gathering’ chapter down, the practice of transforming others is made clear," which answers to his overall judgement of this chapter, the earlier and the later shedding light on each other.

Of the ancient commentaries explaining this treatise there is only one, Huiying's Commentary, and his book is fragmentary: its extant text stops in the middle of chapter sixty-nine, and a running explanation of this chapter is lacking—what is lacking is not recorded as a zero result; the lack is marked as it is. Yet his whole book mentions this chapter in two other places, and both are worth recording. The first is a structural division: 「第二從四攝品去於化品有十品經,明菩薩外化方便」 tr. "Second, from the ‘Four Means of Gathering’ chapter on to the ‘Like a Conjuration’ chapter there are ten chapters of the sūtra, making clear the bodhisattva's skilful means of transforming outwardly," and Huiying himself attributes what he bases this on to the old division of the Dharma masters of the Fu and Yao times—so the judgement ‘this chapter is the head of a section on the skilful means of transforming outwardly’ is one on which Jizang and Huiying, in different books and at different times, run on the same track, and its source lies in the masters contemporary with Kumārajīva's translation assembly; this is one of the firmest pieces of evidence at the level of this chapter's structural division. The second is a question on names and marks: 「問:依下句義品及四攝品,經云皆是出世間法,何故唯言為別無色定」 tr. "Question: according to the ‘Meaning of the Phrase’ chapter below and the ‘Four Means of Gathering’ chapter, the sūtra says these are all world-transcending dharmas; why does it say only that it is for distinguishing the formless absorptions"—what it cites as evidence is precisely this chapter's list of world-transcending dharmas not shared with ordinary people, which shows that although Huiying did not reach the point of commenting on this chapter, in reading this treatise he already took this chapter's text as a basis. Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises preserves one citation in summarising form: 「故大品經二十四卷四攝品云:佛告須菩提:凡夫實不知世諦,不知第一義,不知中道,不知分別道果,云何當有諸道不等也」 tr. "Therefore the ‘Four Means of Gathering’ chapter in fascicle twenty-four of the Larger Sūtra says: The Buddha told Subhūti: ordinary people really do not know worldly truth, do not know the highest meaning, do not know the middle path, do not know how to distinguish the fruits of the path; how should they have the inequalities of the various paths"; the fascicle number it attaches accords with the sūtra being explained, so it is known that what he cites is the sūtra and not the treatise. Collated word by word, this citation omits the one Chinese character 「人」 tr. "people," changes 「第一義諦」 tr. "the truth of the highest meaning" to 「第一義」 tr. "the highest meaning," changes 「諸果」 tr. "the various fruits" to 「諸道不等」 tr. "the inequalities of the various paths," and in the position of 「不知道」 tr. "do not know the path" inserts the phrase 「不知中道」 tr. "do not know the middle path"—and the two Chinese characters 「中道」 tr. "middle path" are absent from both this treatise and the sūtra being explained, before and after this passage. The text just above it is discussing precisely the middle path and the Buddha-nature, so this phrase should be words of Junzheng's own interpretation and not a miscitation of the base text; it is recorded without judgement. As for the books of the Tiantai line—the Great Calming and Contemplation, the Profound Meaning of the Lotus, the Annotations on the Profound Meaning of the Lotus, the Words and Phrases of the Lotus, and the Commentary on the Vimalakīrti Sūtra—searched throughout for the heading 「四攝品」 tr. "The Four Means of Gathering," all are 〔not found〕; no forced connection is drawn, and this is recorded as it is.

Bringing this whole line of further resonances back to this chapter, what the ancient masters saw in common and the bones of this chapter are precisely one matter: the four means of gathering are the place where one turns round. What the chapters before this one speak of is mostly one's own practice—how, within signlessness, one makes the six perfections complete; how, within emptiness, one does not take realisation; from this chapter on, the very same emptiness has to be carried out to face beings. So the difficulty of this chapter has never been 「空不空」 tr. "empty or not empty"; it is ‘once it is emptied, does one still give or not’. Jizang judges this chapter to be the head of transforming outwardly and further takes 「雖能廣利不存化功」 tr. "though he can benefit broadly, he does not keep the merit of transforming" as its latter half; the old division of the Fu and Yao times transmitted by Huiying also calls it directly 「外化方便」 tr. "the skilful means of transforming outwardly"; what the two saw lies in this one same place: transforming outwardly is being able to benefit broadly; skilful means is not keeping the merit. The test this chapter itself gives likewise has precisely two faces. One face is in giving: when I think I have already practised giving, I first ask whether what I give stops at the thing, or whether 「財施已,後教令得無上安隱涅槃」 tr. "having given the gift of wealth, he afterwards teaches them and makes them obtain the unsurpassed nirvāṇa of peace and security"; when I think I am already without discrimination, I first ask whether I can truly do this—「若供養佛、辟支佛、阿羅漢、阿那含、斯陀含、須陀洹等無有異」 tr. "whether he makes offerings to the Buddha, the pratyekabuddha, the arhat, the anāgāmin, the sakṛdāgāmin, the srota-āpanna, and so on, there is no difference"—and, down to birds and beasts, give 「等一布施」 tr. "one and the same giving," or whether it is only that in my mind I do not divide while my hand still picks and chooses. The other face is in not abiding: when I teach the Dharma, I remember this chapter's judgement of the three ways of losing of one who teaches the Dharma—to hold that all dharmas are empty while what one says is not empty is losing; 「若口說空而心是有,是亦為失」 tr. "if the mouth says emptiness while in the mind there is existence, this too is losing"; when I have something attained, I remember the treatise-author's judgement of one who seeks the fruit with a clinging mind, 「如麻中出油」 tr. "as oil is taken out from sesame"; when on this account I grow faint-hearted and do not cultivate, I remember that sentence which blocks the way back—「修尚不得,何況不修!」 tr. "Even cultivating, it is not obtained, how much less without cultivating!" The whole chapter has said all there is to say about the matter of gathering beings and the reason for gathering beings, and what it leaves at the very end is no more than a standing one has when teaching the Dharma—「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中;於法性中不疑、不悶而說法,無罣、無礙、無遮,是則通達法性。」 tr. "One who thoroughly penetrates does not grasp at the mark of the nature of dharmas and does not abide within the nature of dharmas; within the nature of dharmas he teaches the Dharma without doubt and without oppression, without hindrance, without obstruction, without blocking: this is to penetrate the nature of dharmas." Gathering without abiding in the gathering, speaking without abiding in the speaking: the meaning of the four means of gathering is exhausted here.

考據Apparatus

一、科判

本品在《大智度論》釋《大品般若》之次第中屬〈釋餘品〉一段,跨卷八十八、八十九。品題「大智度論釋四攝品第七十八」〔T25 0677c26〕居卷八十八之中,非卷首起題——卷八十八自前品〈六喻品第七十七〉之品題開卷,前品訖於「上以一念中能具諸波羅蜜,此以諸法雖空無相而能具諸波羅蜜為異」〔T25 0677c24〕一句迄,本品品題緊接其後,故本品為『繫卷中·不繫卷首』之型,與前品之『品題即卷題』正相反。

卷八十八末題「大智度論卷第八十八」〔T25 0684b05〕,本品未竟;卷八十九以續題「大智度論釋四攝品第七十八之餘」〔T25 0684b08〕重起,並重出造署「聖者龍樹菩薩造」〔T25 0684b11〕、譯署「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」〔T25 0684b12〕。續題作「之餘」而非「之下」,與品四十、四十一、四十三、四十五、四十七諸品跨卷同型,如實誌錄。造署作「聖者龍樹菩薩造」——較品四十七、品七十七之「聖者龍樹造」多「菩薩」二字,屬底本造署用語之逐卷小異,如實誌錄不強解。

品身訖於「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中;於法性中不疑、不悶而說法,無罣、無礙、無遮,是則通達法性」〔T25 0687c15〕一段,止於〔T25 0687c17〕;次品〈善達品第七十九〉品題起於〔T25 0687c18〕,其經文「云何菩薩善達諸法相」〔T25 0687c19〕另起一問,與本品末段之「善通達法性」文脈相接而品界分明。

全品純漢字一萬四千零一十(工具值與本目逐段重算相合,無差額——異於品三十八至四十七各帳屢見之十數字口徑差)。依卷界與經論段界析為三單元:之上(卷八十八【經】段)四千九百五十四、之中(卷八十八【論】段)四千二百三十六、之下(卷八十九全段)四千八百二十,三數之和與全品值精確相符,零字漏失。切點皆為既有之卷界或【經】【論】標記,未新造任何邊界。

本版三單元之名與底本異本題記之「之上」「之下」不相蒙(易混處先揭)。 底本明本於品題作「釋四攝品第七十八之上」、於卷八十九續題作「七十八之下」——明本傳承自以卷界二分本品為之上、之下;本版則因純漢字逾常額而於卷八十八內再取【論】標記為界,成之上、之中、之下三單元。二者分法不同、名同而所指異,讀者以卷界為準:本版之上與之中合當明本之「之上」,本版之下即明本之「之下」。此為呈現層之切分,非異本之異文,誌錄以防誤讀。

品內結構為二經二論:【經】〔T25 0677c27〕、【論】〔T25 0681b01〕、【經】〔T25 0684b13〕、【論】〔T25 0686b21〕。四標記之校記情形兩兩有別:兩【論】標記皆入校勘條目(前者宋、元、明、宮、聖五本無此標記,後者宋、宮、聖三本無此標記),而兩【經】標記則否——經①之處底本無注,經②之處雖有注(記宋、宮、聖三本無此標記、石本不分卷)而不成校勘條目。標記存否屬底本傳承層,結構計數仍依底本標籤為準。

論段之問答密度:論①(之中)「問曰」「答曰」各二十見、「有人言」八見;論②(之下)「問曰」「答曰」各四見、「有人言」一見。論②後半另有一段以具名「須菩提問」「佛可須菩提言」「須菩提言」「佛言」句式展開之往復(自〔T25 0686c09〕至〔T25 0687c08〕),非「問曰」「答曰」之常式——判為論主牒經擬問答(論主以經中人物之名續申論義,非另牒經文,亦非經文本身),本目專列誌其體式,白話層依底本標籤直譯不增不減,義疏層明其為論主之筆。

二、術語考

本品之名相以四攝為綱,二施為目,下貫相好、字門、二諦、二空諸義。逐條誌其底本定義,不代定讀。

四攝(布施·愛語·利益·同事)。 總標出於經①:「以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事」〔T25 0679b18〕。四事之釋分居兩單元:布施一事於經①廣說(財施、法施二門,下詳),餘三事至經②方各以一句收之——「菩薩摩訶薩以六波羅蜜為眾生說法」〔T25 0685a03〕是愛語,「菩薩摩訶薩長夜教眾生,令行六波羅蜜」〔T25 0685a06〕是利行,「菩薩摩訶薩以五神通力故種種變化,入五道中,與眾生同事」〔T25 0685a07〕是同事。四攝之名相輕重懸殊(布施逾三頁,餘三僅三句),論主自設問答釋其所以(見第五目)。

二施(財施·法施)。 「菩薩以二種施攝取眾生:財施、法施」〔T25 0679b20〕。財施之目自金銀珍寶、飲食衣服以至「若以己身,給施眾生」,施已必繼之以教(三歸、五戒、一日戒、四禪四無量四無色、六念、不淨觀、安那般那,乃至三十七道品、四沙門果、辟支佛道、阿耨多羅三藐三菩提),其收句為「財施已,後教令得無上安隱涅槃」——財施非止於物,以物為門而終於涅槃,此本品財施義之骨。

世間法施·出世間法施。 「法施有二種:一者、世間,二者、出世間」〔T25 0679c11〕。世間法施之目為「不淨觀、安那般那念、四禪、四無量心、四無色定」〔T25 0679c13〕,並繫一句判其所攝:「如是等世間法,及諸餘共凡夫所行法,是名世間法施」〔T25 0679c14〕——判準在『共凡夫所行』。出世間法施則以聖無漏法為體。

聖無漏法·聖無漏法果。 經①兩度界說,前後不同而不相違。其一以法目言:「聖無漏法者,三十七助道法、三解脫門」〔T25 0679c19〕;其二以智言:四果智、辟支佛道智、三十七助道法智、六波羅蜜智乃至大慈大悲智——「如是等一切法,若世間若出世間智慧、若有漏若無漏、若有為若無為,是法中一切種智,是名菩薩摩訶薩聖無漏法」。其果則一:「斷一切煩惱習,是名聖無漏法果」〔T25 0679c29〕。前說舉其目,後說舉其智;果唯一事,斷習而已。

出世間不共凡夫法。 經①列目甚長(四念處以下三十七道品、三三昧、八背捨、九次第定、十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、三十二相、八十隨形好、五百陀羅尼門),其中九次第定、三十二相、八十隨形好三事實與世間共有,論①遂設問徵之,答以三事各有其不共之處:滅受想定「但聖人能得」〔T25 0682c27〕;四禪四無色定之不共在「不雜餘心」之次第修;相好之不共在「名字雖同,而威德、具足、淨潔、得處則不同於佛」〔T25 0683a02〕,且「八十隨形好具足,唯佛菩薩有之」〔T25 0683a09〕。判準不在名相之有無,在威德具足與果報所從。

三十二相·八十隨形好。 三十二相逐相列於經①之末,收句「是三十二相,佛身成就」〔T25 0681a24〕;八十隨形好逐條列於經②之首,自「一者、無見頂」〔T25 0684b13〕至「八十者、手足有德相」〔T25 0684c23〕,收句「須菩提!是八十隨形好,佛身成就」〔T25 0684c24〕。八十好中「二十一者、識滿足」〔T25 0684b22〕與「二十三者、住處安,無能動者」〔T25 0684b23〕兩條不類身相,論②專為之設問(見第三目、第五目)。

法身·生身。 論①釋相好何以至論將訖方說:「佛有二種身:法身、生身。於二身中,法身為大」〔T25 0683a16〕,法身益多故先廣說;「是生身相好莊嚴是聖無漏法果報」〔T25 0683a18〕,故次第置於末後。此二身之分亦是論①釋經段重出之據:「先說生身菩薩,今說變化身。先說一國土,今說無量世界」〔T25 0681c18〕。

性·欲(十力所攝之二法)。 論①釋佛十力中之「知一切世間種種無數性」,別立性欲之辨:「性先有,欲得因緣而生。譬如先有瘡,得觸因緣則血出」〔T25 0683b23〕;「性在內,欲在外。性重,欲輕。性難除,欲易捨。性深,欲淺」〔T25 0683b25〕——並判其業報之異(用性作業必當受報,用欲作業不必受報)。其下復錄異說:「欲常習增長,遂成為性;性亦能生欲」〔T25 0683b27〕——兩說並錄不判。

四十二字門·無字法。 經②教眾生「善男子!當善學分別諸字,亦當善知一字乃至四十二字」〔T25 0685a11〕,其互攝之式為「一字皆入四十二字,四十二字亦入一字」〔T25 0685a14〕,其次第為「善學四十二字已,能善說字法;善說字法已,善說無字法」〔T25 0685a15〕,其歸結為「過一切名字故,名為佛法」〔T25 0685a19〕。論②釋之以算數之喻,並立其義理次第:「善知字故,善知諸法名;善知諸法名故,善知諸法義。無字即是諸法實相義」〔T25 0686c06〕——字是門,無字是義;不由字則不入,止於字則不達。

報得五神通·果報六神通。 經②須菩提之問作「云何住報得五神通為眾生說法」〔T25 0685a27〕,論②轉述同一問則作「云何菩薩住果報六神通,為眾生說諸法」〔T25 0686c10〕——經作五、論作六,數不同。經①別處另有「住報得六波羅蜜中及住報得五神通、三十七助道法」〔T25 0678b20〕之語,與經②之「五」合。論②之「六」與經文之「五」並存於同一底本,如實誌錄不強解,不以一方改一方。

二諦(世諦·第一義)。 經②之收處:「世諦故,分別說有果報,非第一義」〔T25 0686a04〕;第一義之相為「是第一義,實無有相,無有分別,亦無言說」〔T25 0686a05〕。其分別之所以能立,繫於知與不知:「以凡夫人實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果,云何當有諸果」〔T25 0686a15〕;「聖人知世諦、知第一義諦,有道、有修道,以是故聖人差別有諸果」〔T25 0686a17〕。論②承之而立一句總判:「第一義中無縛無解,世諦故有縛有解」〔T25 0686c23〕。

二空(畢竟空·無始空)。 經①開宗即立:「住二空中——畢竟空、無始空,為眾生說法」〔T25 0678a07〕;論①釋其分職:「畢竟空破諸法;無始空破眾生相」〔T25 0681b19〕。論②復設問何以此中但說二空,答曰:「一切所有:若法、若眾生。若言畢竟空,則破諸法;若言無始空,則破眾生」〔T25 0687a25〕,並以火喻別其深淺:「餘空如火燒木,猶有灰燼;畢竟空無灰無燼」〔T25 0687a29〕。其下錄異說:「若說十八空無咎,略說故說二空」〔T25 0687b01〕——兩說並錄不判。

不住法(法性·如·實際)。 經②之末立四重不住:「無所有法不住無所有法,所有法不住所有法,自性法不住自性法,他性法不住他性法」〔T25 0685c13〕,其所以然為「是一切法皆不可得故。不可得法當住何處」。論②承之以三喻(見第三目)。全品收於「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中」〔T25 0687c15〕——通達之相,正在不取不住。

三、譬喻與故事

本品之喻多在論段,經段唯化人一喻。可分四類:釋不瞋悔者、釋十力者、釋相好者、釋不住者。

佛所化人化作化人喻(經②·全品唯一經喻)。 「譬如佛所化人,化人復化作無量千萬億人」〔T25 0685b24〕,化人教布施持戒乃至四無色定,而「是化人無心、無心數法,云何分別破壞諸法」〔T25 0685b29〕——菩薩為眾生說法而不壞法相,正如化人之說而無心。此喻於經②再現於收處:「譬如佛所化人布施,亦不受布施報,但為度眾生故」〔T25 0686b15〕,一喻兩用:前明說而無分別,後明行而不受報。

大赦喻(承『不盡度三惡道』義)。 論①答三惡道何以不盡空:「菩薩雖無邊無量,眾生倍多無量」〔T25 0682a23〕,「菩薩隨眾生可度因緣,若於三惡道中有餘功德者,菩薩則度」〔T25 0682a24〕,末繫一喻:「譬如大赦,及者得脫,不及者則不蒙」〔T25 0682a27〕——赦之不及,不由赦之不普,由受赦者之緣不具。

香飯喻(引《維摩詰經》·承『食菩薩肉得度』義)。 論①答眾生食菩薩肉何以反得度,先出本願「若有眾生噉我肉者,當令得度」〔T25 0682a29〕,次以色聲香觸各有喜瞋為例,末引經證:「服食香飯,七日得道者,有不得者」〔T25 0682b05〕——非以噉肉故得度,以起發慈心故得度,本品之判語極明。

藥王以身為燈喻(引《法華經》·承「以身布施」義)。 「以身為燈供養於佛,爾乃足滿」〔T25 0682b10〕——外物珍寶供養而意猶不滿,至以身乃滿;論主並自釋其理:人得外物不以為恩,「得其身時,乃能驚感」。

良醫觀病喻(承「處非處力」義)。 佛以初力籌量眾生可度不可度,「譬如良醫,觀其病相,審定知其可活則治之,不可活者則捨之」〔T25 0683b05〕——捨非無悲,於不可度者「修捨心」。

瘡得觸則血出喻·火熱水濕喻(承『性欲之辨』義)。 「性先有,欲得因緣而生。譬如先有瘡,得觸因緣則血出」〔T25 0683b23〕;復答眾生何以不皆作善欲:「如火熱性、水濕性,不應責其所以」〔T25 0683b21〕——性之所以然不可更問,問之則無窮。

舍利弗晡時之事(本起故事·承『後三力唯佛有』義)。 有一人即日應得阿羅漢,舍利弗日中時語之「汝無得道因緣」而捨不度;「晡時,佛以宿命神通見過去八萬劫前得道因緣」〔T25 0683c16〕,即日說法而其人得道——聲聞之智有涯,故十力唯佛有之。

羅剎相·水鳥相·罽賓國菩薩手網縵(承『相隨所好而現』義)。 論①錄相好定不定之四說,第二說謂相隨眾生所好而現,其證有二。其一以反例明之:「又眾生不貴纖長指及網縵,以長指利爪為羅剎相,以網縵為水鳥相」〔T25 0684a09〕;其二為一則實事:「如罽賓國彌帝」〔T25 0684a11〕後有底本造字一(見下專列),續云「力利菩薩手網縵,其父惡以為怪」〔T25 0684a12〕,其父以刀割之而言「我子何緣如鳥」〔T25 0684a13〕——同一相,於此為佛相,於彼為鳥相。

底本造字專列。 〔T25 0684a12〕「彌帝」二字之後、「力利」二字之前有底本造字一(CBETA 編號 CB01417),組字式作 [肄-聿+(入/米)]。本版原樣傳錄其組字式,不取任何正規化之單字形——此為本品唯一造字,逐字核已就位。

密迹經之現色(引經·承第四說義)。 「或現金色、或現銀色、或日月星宿色,或長、或短,隨可引導眾生則為現相」〔T25 0684a22〕;並以當時風土為證:「天竺國人于今故治肩髆令厚大、頭上皆以有髻為好」〔T25 0684a25〕——羅什譯場以此土審美釋彼土相好之痕,如實誌錄。其收句「是故佛隨眾生所好而為現相好。如是等,無有常定」〔T25 0684a16〕與第三說「此三十二相實定,以神通力變化身,隨眾生所好而為現相」〔T25 0684a17〕相對而立,四說並錄不判。

白衣勇士牢持器仗喻(承「住處安」義)。 論②釋八十好之「住處安」:「住處安者,如白衣勇士,牢持器仗,安據住處,則不可動」〔T25 0686b28〕,並繫出家之相:「又出家時,魔民、惡鬼無能動轉令退敗者」〔T25 0686b29〕。

虛空不住虛空·火不住火中(承「不住法」義)。 論②釋經②之四重不住,以三喻明之:無所有法不住無所有,「譬如虛空不住虛空」〔T25 0686c29〕;自性法不住自性法,「譬如火不住火中」〔T25 0687a01〕。他性不住他性則以水性中無火性為喻,並繫一語「又他性不定故」。

麻中出油喻·二人不到喻(承「修道得果不」義)。 論②釋佛何以先說修道得果而今言不得:「佛先說,非著心;今須菩提以著心問,欲從道中出果,如麻中出油」〔T25 0687b18〕;又慮聽者反執不修,故設二人之喻:「譬如二人欲有所到:一者、住,不行;二者、失道。二俱不到」〔T25 0687b22〕——住與失道,同是不到;不修與著心修,同是無果。其判在「若心取相修道,雖有攝心禪定樂,無有道果」〔T25 0687b24〕。

四、所釋經文

品題三造全帳(底本十二字·明本十字·宮本十三字·石本十八字兼卷記)。 品題〔T25 0677c26〕之注逐字全帳如下。底本(大正)作「大智度論釋四攝品第七十八」十二字;明本作「釋四攝品第七十八之上」十字,缺「大智度論」四字前綴而增「之上」二字;宮本作「大智度論釋第七十八品四攝品」十三字,語序異而品號同;石本作「摩訶般若波羅蜜品第七十七四攝品八十九」十八字,品號作「第七十七」,較底本少一階,並於同注內另記「卷第八十九首」。此注屬品題注層,不在校勘條目二百二十之內,故於本目與第八目專列。

石本之卷次自成一系(一品一卷·三記首尾相扣)。 石本於本品範圍前後共留三記:前品末〔T25 0677c25〕處記「卷第八十八終」,品題處記「卷第八十九首」,品末〔T25 0687c17〕處記「卷第八十九終」,而次品〈善達品〉起題處記「卷第九十首」。四記相扣,石本以本品全篇獨為其卷八十九——與底本(卷八十八之中起、跨入卷八十九)之分卷全不相同。石本又於卷八十八末題處記「不分卷」、於經②標記處記「不分卷」,即石本無底本之卷八十八、八十九分界。此屬卷次層面之異,非品號異讀,如實誌錄不判。

品號負一階之續(石本單見·聖本兩向不一)。 石本品號少一階,與品四十四至四十七一貫之模式延續無斷:品題作「第七十七」,品末尾記作「性釋第七十七品竟」。聖本則於卷題、續題處同作負一階(卷八十八末題注作「好釋第七六品訖第七十七品上」,卷八十九續題注作「七十七品下訖第七十八品」),而於品末尾記處作「性釋第七十八品」——聖本尾記不與其卷題同階。諸本各自來源、同向不必同步,誌錄不判,不以一處推全系。

卷題與續題五造。 卷八十八末題〔T25 0684b05〕之注三:石本無此卷題;「論」字聖本作「經論」;「八」字宮本作「八釋第七十七品訖第七十八品」。卷八十九續題〔T25 0684b08〕之注四:「論」字聖本作「經論」;「四攝品」三字聖本無;「七十八之餘」一句,宋元作「七十八下訖第七十九品」、明作「七十八之下」、宮作「七十八品下訖第七十九品」、聖作「七十七品下訖第七十八品」;「卷」字宮本作「卷第」。宋元宮三本著錄卷八十九實跨本品與次品之界(「訖第七十九品」),與底本同——卷八十九於本品內不收卷,續攝次品。

所釋經《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》之對位(卷第二十四·品題注·梵文標目不採)。 所釋經 T223 之〈四攝品第七十八〉起於〔T08 0392b12〕,其上〔T08 0392b09〕為卷題「摩訶般若波羅蜜經卷第二十四」——本品所釋之經文,於所釋經自身居其卷二十四,此一事下與均正之引文相合(見第六目)。所釋經品題之注記宋、元、明、宮、聖五本題作「摩訶般若波羅蜜經四攝品第七十八」(增經名前綴),同注末尾另繫大正編者所加之梵文標目一行——此屬近代編者所繫,非古德所傳,本版誌其存在而不採為梵源依據,亦不轉錄。

所釋經側目錄屬性重出(標記層異常·如實誌)。 所釋經 T223 之品級目錄,本品顯文作「78 四攝品」〔T08 0392b12〕而其編碼屬性標「78」,前品顯文「77 六喻品」〔T08 0389c29〕其屬性亦標「78」——兩品重出。本目復逐條核其上下:品七十五、七十六之屬性亦同標「76」,重出者凡兩處;次品「79 善達品」〔T08 0398a07〕屬性標「79」,序復歸正。顯文品號序列本身連續無誤,重出唯在編碼屬性層,屬底本電子本標記層瑕疵,非義理歧異,如實誌錄不強解;對位一律以顯文與內容逐字比對為準。

兩藏分卷點不同(所釋經側中途分卷)。 所釋經側於〔T08 0395a18〕(「云何為四無所畏」前)有一注:宋、元、明、宮四本於此另起「摩訶般若波羅蜜經卷第二十七,四攝品第七十八之餘」並記「分卷」。即所釋經之宋元明宮系亦於本品中途分卷,而其分卷點(四無所畏之前)與本論之卷八十八、八十九界(八十隨形好之前)不同。兩藏各自分卷、各自為政,皆不害品之為一品,如實誌錄。

全量牒經對讀(兩側對勘·開篇逐句核·對照組三串)。 本論經①開篇與所釋經〈四攝品〉逐字幾近同文——本論作「須菩提白佛言:「世尊!若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者」〔T25 0677c27〕;所釋經同段起於〔T08 0392b13〕,句式全同,異唯在標點分合與一處增略:本論作「是法能得須陀洹果,能得斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果」,所釋經作「是法能得須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果」——本論重出「能得」二字,所釋經不重,屬牒經層之增字,如實誌錄。對照組:「八十隨形好,佛身成就」、「以二施攝取眾生,所謂財施、法施」、「實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果」三串漢字流,於本論全書與所釋經全經各唯一見(本論分見〔T25 0684c24〕〔T25 0685a01〕〔T25 0686a15〕,所釋經分見〔T08 0396b10〕〔T08 0396b11〕〔T08 0397b28〕),對位唯一、無他品可淆。本論二【論】層為論體之結構性擴增,所釋經無此層,非異文。所釋經側於本品對讀範圍內之校勘見證逐條統計,本目未展開,據實誌其未展開,不以估值充數。

五、般若義眼

本品之眼,在把「空」與「有分別」這兩件看似相礙之事,收進一個次第裏。其義可約為五重。

其一,空中之所以仍有善惡,在顛倒而非在法。品首之問即是全品之問:畢竟空中云何分別善不善、有漏無漏乃至三乘諸果。佛之答不辯其理而指其事——「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業」〔T25 0678a04〕。夢是空的,夢裏造的業卻是有的;空不礙其起,正因其起於顛倒。故論①釋之云「凡夫顛倒心故,於法皆作顛倒異見,乃至不見一法是實」〔T25 0681b12〕。

其二,菩薩之用,在「拔出」而非在「說破」。經①言菩薩住二空為眾生說一切法如夢如化,隨即以方便力次第拔之:於慳中拔出令行布施,於布施果報中拔出令持戒,乃至於禪定中拔出令住涅槃道。論①點出此中之機關——布施持戒禪定皆「因顛倒而生」,「雖少時益眾生,久則變異,能生苦惱故,亦教令捨離」。先與之一個可著之善,再奪其所著,此本品方便義之骨;若布施持戒是定實法,則不應令遠離。

其三,平等施之判準是「一切法不異」。經①立布施之極則:供佛與施禽獸「無有異」,不作福田非福田之簡擇;其理唯一句——「一切法不異、不分別故」〔T25 0678c08〕;其果亦唯一句——「是菩薩無異、無別布施已,當得無分別法報,所謂一切種智」〔T25 0678c09〕。因地不分別,果地得無分別智,因果同一相。而簡擇之失說得極重:「若分別簡擇,便墮諸佛、菩薩、辟支佛、學無學人、一切世間天及人訶責處」〔T25 0678c20〕,其訶責之辭為「誰請汝救一切眾生?汝為一切眾生舍、一切眾生護、一切眾生依」〔T25 0678c21〕——自許為一切眾生之依,便無揀擇之餘地。至於捨身,理更逼一層:「是菩薩摩訶薩為眾生故受身,眾生來取,何可不與」〔T25 0678c26〕;而其行之所以能無所傷,在「是中誰與、誰受?所施何物」〔T25 0679a02〕之觀——「住是諸空布施,是時具足檀波羅蜜」〔T25 0679a05〕。

其四,四攝之詳略自有其理。論①自設兩問收之:何以四事中獨廣布施?答「布施中攝三事故,以財施、法施教化眾生,則無所不攝」〔T25 0682b29〕,且「四事中初廣開布施,則知餘三亦如是」——舉一例三。何以布施中又廣法施?答「財施少,法施廣故」〔T25 0682c03〕,其別在四重:「財施,有量果報;法施,無量果報」〔T25 0682c04〕,財施繫欲界、法施通三界乃至出三界,財施與三界富樂、法施與涅槃常樂,又「財施從法施生,聞法則能施故」。詳略不是偏心,是果報之量自然如此。

其五,二諦之收,收在「知」與「不知」,不在法之有無。經②末段之詰難甚利:色等既不異法性,何以猶有黑白之報、四果之差?佛答「世諦故,分別說有果報,非第一義」〔T25 0686a04〕。難者再逼:若如此,凡夫亦應有須陀洹果。佛乃以反詰收之——「以凡夫人實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果,云何當有諸果」〔T25 0686a15〕;「聖人知世諦、知第一義諦,有道、有修道,以是故聖人差別有諸果」〔T25 0686a17〕。分別之所以能立,繫於能分別者之知;凡夫不知二諦,故連世諦之果亦無分。而此知亦不可執為所得:「修道不得果,不修道亦不得果,亦不離道得果,亦不住道中得果」〔T25 0686a19〕,四句俱遣。末以說法者之姿態收全品:「是菩薩自得無所著法,亦教人令得無所著法」〔T25 0686b09〕;「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中」〔T25 0687c15〕——通達法性者不住法性,猶如火不住火中;能說而不著所說,是本品之終義。

六、諸家異釋

《大智度論》本無逐文全疏之傳統,古德引釋率屬據實偏倚。本品古德覆讀之情形三分:釋所釋經之吉藏疏存完整專章;釋本論之慧影疏於本品逐文之釋闕,然全書另有兩處提及本品;均正書中有括略引一條。天台諸系與注維摩之回搜以負命題結案(見下)。此目誌錄其所疏所引與本品之對應,不判各家詮釋高下。

吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451)·專章命中。 本品之疏起〔X24n0451 0330b14〕(其品名目錄別列於〔X24n0451 0195c13〕),訖〔X24n0451 0332a12〕,覆本品所釋經全篇。其可誌者六。

其一,品位總判——「此下第二明外化方便。前是內行方便,亦前是自行今是化他,由內行滿足故能外益生」〔X24n0451 0330b15〕:吉藏以本品為全經「化他」一大段之首。其科之次為「第一此品明菩薩為化道無方巧化非一,第二善達品明為化之能,第三實際品明為化之意」〔X24n0451 0330b19〕——三品一組,本品居首。同一分判亦見於其釋〈道樹品〉處:「第二從四攝品以下,明化他行」〔X24n0451 0324b16〕,前後自相照應。

其二,品內二分——「初品為二:第一明菩薩化攝無邊為益無量,第二明菩薩雖能廣利不存化功」〔X24n0451 0330b21〕;前分復二:「第一明生身方便益物,第二明法身菩提化物遍滿十方也」〔X24n0451 0330b23〕。

其三,重問之三義——「昔論有三義生起」〔X24n0451 0330c01〕,其三義(無始有所得病難破、說經將訖空為入道之要、佛滅後五百歲眾生鈍根難悟)與論①所出三因緣次第相當(見第七目)。吉藏並自繫前後品之問:「上品末問與今問同。上品末答明無所有破病,今品答明法雖無所有於凡夫有也」〔X24n0451 0330c06〕。

其四,簡擇之得失——「外施中為二:初、正明平等施為得;次、明簡擇施為失」〔X24n0451 0330c23〕,其下復開一層:「須知簡擇不簡擇但得失安,無明無知心中簡擇不簡擇但失」〔X24n0451 0330c24〕——有方便者簡擇不簡擇俱得,無方便者俱失。

其五,相好二問——「問:三十二相云何是出世間法?答:此是無漏果無漏業日起」〔X24n0451 0331a21〕;「問:上來何故不明相好,至此始明耶?答:生、法二身。上來明法身,法身最勝故;次明生身,生身劣故也」〔X24n0451 0331a22〕。兩問與論①所設兩問全合。其釋種智之問則作「當得種智名菩薩,已得種智名佛也」〔X24n0451 0331a18〕,與論①之答同軌。又「問:何故廣釋布施?若布施在初既廣,後亦例廣,後略明亦略也」〔X24n0451 0331b13〕,亦與論①舉一例三之答相當。

其六,二諦之難——吉藏於此自陳與「由來諸大師」之異:諸師以須菩提就世諦作難,吉藏則判其就第一義作難,末歸於「佛答:凡夫不知二諦,不語二諦也」〔X24n0451 0331c24〕,並釋標初果之故:「須陀洹是聖始,故標初為言也」〔X24n0451 0331c24〕。又其釋四十二字門云「四十二字入一字,論四十二字皆有阿分,故入阿中也」〔X24n0451 0331b21〕——明言「論」,即引本論論②之文以釋所釋經,其相承之跡逐字可按。

慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791)·本品逐文之釋闕·全書二處提及(如實誌)。 為釋本論之唯一古疏,僅殘卷存世;現存文本止於〔X46n0791 0917b12〕(品六十九之中),故本品逐文之釋闕,不記為零命中。惟其書全篇另有兩處提及本品,本目逐字核之。其一為科判:「第二從四攝品去於化品有十品經,明菩薩外化方便」〔X46n0791 0912c21〕——慧影與吉藏同以本品為「外化方便」一段之首,二家異書而同軌,且慧影自繫其所本為「苻姚時諸法師」之舊科。其二為名相之問:「問:依下句義品及四攝品,經云皆是出世間法,何故唯言為別無色定」〔X46n0791 0815a14〕——所徵者正是本品「出世間不共凡夫法」之列目(見第二目),可見慧影雖未及疏本品,其讀本論時已以本品之文為據。

均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784)·括略引一條。 「故大品經二十四卷四攝品云:佛告須菩提:凡夫實不知世諦,不知第一義,不知中道,不知分別道果,云何當有諸道不等也」〔X46n0784 0624a14〕。其所繫之卷次與所釋經自身相合(所釋經本品居其卷二十四,見第四目),可知均正所引為所釋經而非本論。逐字對勘所引與底本:所釋經作「以凡夫人實不知世諦,不知第一義諦,不知道,不知分別道果,云何當有諸果」〔T08 0397b27〕,本論同段作「以凡夫人實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果,云何當有諸果」〔T25 0686a15〕——均正所引為括略改寫:省「人」字、易「第一義諦」為「第一義」、易「諸果」為「諸道不等」,且於「不知道」之位插入「不知中道」一語。本目於本論、所釋經兩造逐字回搜,「中道」二字皆不見於此段前後——此語為均正自身詮釋之詞(其上文正論中道與佛性),非誤引底本,如實誌錄不判。

天台諸系與注維摩·負命題結案(專項查誌實)。 智顗《摩訶止觀》(T46n1911)、湛然《止觀輔行傳弘決》(T46n1912)、智顗《法華玄義》(T33n1716)、湛然《法華玄義釋籤》(T33n1717)、智顗《法華文句》(T34n1718)、僧肇等《注維摩詰經》(T38n1775)六部逐字回搜「四攝品」:全數零命中。本品未見此六部之具名徵引,零命中亦是帳,不以他品之引例充填。

七、互讀與承衍

本品之義脈,前後相承者有五,皆此目所誌,不代定讀。

其一,重問之承(品七十七→七十八·論主自答其所以)。 論①開卷即自問:「上來已,處處說:「諸法性空,云何分別有善、不善?」」〔T25 0681b01〕——何以品品義無異而作種種名問?其答先立一句「是事上已答」〔T25 0681b03〕,次出三因緣:「眾生從無始生死已來著心深難解故,須菩提復作是重問」〔T25 0681b04〕;「是般若波羅蜜欲說是空,義要故,數問」〔T25 0681b05〕;「佛滅度五百年後,像法中眾生愛著佛法,墮著法中」〔T25 0681b07〕故憐愍重明。論主自承本品之問與前品之問是同一問,其異唯在答處——前品答以無所有破病,本品答以「法雖無所有於凡夫有」(吉藏語,見第六目)。校勘層亦留兩品相連之痕:本品十八條星號重引之中,二條之所共之注落在品七十七範圍(見第八目),同一異讀跨品共注,底本編碼層自證兩品相接。

其二,品內前指與品外前指(論主自誌)。 論①兩度自指前文:釋相好之異云「如先分別轉輪聖王、佛相不同中說」〔T25 0683a03〕;釋十力前云「四念處等諸法義,如先說」〔T25 0683a20〕。論②則指向本論總綱:「四十二字義,如摩訶衍中說」〔T25 0686c01〕。三處皆論主自成經緯,非後人所加。

其三,引他經三部(《維摩詰經》《法華經》《密迹經》)。 論①於一品之內引三經為證:香飯之喻引《維摩詰經》〔T25 0682b05〕、以身為燈引《法華經》〔T25 0682b10〕、隨好現色引《密迹經》〔T25 0684a22〕。三引皆作證助釋,不涉判教,如實誌錄。

其四,古德科判之同軌(吉藏·慧影·苻姚舊科)。 本品於全經之位,吉藏判為「外化方便」之首〔X24n0451 0330b15〕,慧影引苻姚時諸法師之科亦作「第二從四攝品去於化品有十品經,明菩薩外化方便」〔X46n0791 0912c21〕——二家異書、異時而同繫本品為內行轉外化之關捩,且慧影明言其所承為羅什譯場同時諸師之舊科。此為本品科判層最堅之一證,兩造並存,誌錄不判。

其五,寶庫掛鏈(穩定徵引·軟引)。 本品『四攝攝生』之菩薩行門、『財施必繼以教、終於涅槃』之施教次第、『一切法不異故等一布施』之平等施義、『財施有量法施無量』之二施判、『字是門無字是義』之四十二字門義、『凡夫不知二諦故無諸果』之二諦義、『不取法性相亦不住法性中』之說法者姿態,為般若行門與二諦義之論藏所本,落穩定徵引〔T25n1509 四攝品·卷八十八至八十九〕;心經/金剛經/唯識諸帙引本論處尚未定稿,故軟引,俟其逐字核存。此屬般若義下貫諸經之承衍,誌錄不判。

八、校本與版本說明

本品底本為《大智度論》卷八十八至八十九〔T25 0677c26–0687c18〕(品身正文自品題〔T25 0677c26〕起,之上、之中兩單元居卷八十八,之下一單元自卷八十九續題〔T25 0684b08〕起,終於〔T25 0687c17〕,次品起於〔T25 0687c18〕);所釋經校本為《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》〈四攝品第七十八〉〔T08 0392b12 起,訖 0398a07 前〕;古德疏校本為吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451,覆本品〔X24n0451 0330b14–0332a12〕);慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791)本品逐文之釋闕、另有二處品外提及,均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784)括略引一條,天台諸系與注維摩負命題結案(並見第六目)。異讀校記依大正校勘,涉大正底本與宋、元、明、宮、聖、石(石山寺本)諸本及麗藏(K)、CBETA 校之異。

見證層(宋明元三本為大宗·聖乙全品零見證)。 本品校記二百二十條之見證分布,本目逐條重算:宋一百一十七見、明一百一十四見、元一百零九見、聖七十八見、宮七十六見、石五十六見;CBETA 校四見、麗藏校四見。其中缺字條(異本無此字)一百零六條,將近全帳之半。聖乙本於本品零見證——與品四十五至四十七聖乙密集大出之情形全異;麗乙、南藏、北藏亦皆零見。低出之本如實誌錄其零,不以他品之密度推補。

兩【經】標記之注不入條目(結構標記之不對稱)。 二【論】標記皆成校勘條目(〔T25 0681b01〕、〔T25 0686b21〕),而二【經】標記則否:經①〔T25 0677c27〕處底本無注;經②〔T25 0684b13〕處有注一(記宋、宮、聖三本無此標記,並記石本不分卷)而不成條目。另卷八十八末題前〔T25 0684b04〕處有石本「不分卷」注一,亦不入條目。此三注屬注層,本目專列補之,使結構標記之異讀無漏。

CBETA 依麗藏校訂型四條(正讀為 CBETA 校訂·專列)。 本品屬 CBETA 現代校勘層、依《高麗藏》(K14n0549)校訂之特殊型凡四條,逐字核底本,專列:其一〔T25 0678c11〕「匃(K14n0549_p1383c04)【CB】【麗-CB】|匈【大】」;其二〔T25 0684a25〕「髆(K14n0549_p1391c11)【CB】|[骨*(十/田/寸)](K14n0549_p1391c11)【麗-CB】|𮪴【大】|膊【宋】【元】【明】【宮】」——此條之 CBETA 讀法作單字形、麗藏讀法作組字式,二形並出,本版於總帳原樣傳錄;其三〔T25 0684c11〕「臍(K14n0549_p1392b15)(T08n0223_p0396a26)【CB】【麗-CB】|齎【大】|臍【宮】」——此條兼繫所釋經對應位之交叉引,是本品唯一帶第二重交叉引者;其四〔T25 0687b23〕「者(K14n0549_p1396b18)【CB】【麗-CB】|道【大】」。四條中三條之交叉引串於底本為緊接無分隔之拼接形,工作底本為可讀計以全形括號分隔,字面無增減。本版讀者面從 CBETA 現行文本讀法。

星號條十八(品內十六·跨品二·專列誌型)。 本品星號重引條(同一異讀於文中重複出現而共用一注)凡十八,隨條標明於下表。逐條核其所共之注:十六條之所共者落於本品範圍內(〔T25 0678b05〕含/舍、〔T25 0678b26〕取/缺、〔T25 0680a16〕循/修與觀/缺、〔T25 0680b08〕背捨/解脫四見共一注、〔T25 0680b16〕知/缺、〔T25 0683a07〕相/缺、〔T25 0684a06〕導/道、〔T25 0685b17〕空/缺、〔T25 0685c25〕際/際不異、〔T25 0686a26〕果/缺),二條之所共者落於品七十七範圍——〔T25 0678c02〕「相」字注(所共之注在〔T25 0677a17〕)、〔T25 0681b01〕「【論】」標記注(所共之注在〔T25 0677b16〕,即品七十七之【論】標記注)。後者一條尤可誌:前品之【論】標記注正是此星號之定義處,而其共用者落在前品之外、即本品,兩品之結構標記共一注,與第七目所誌兩品相接之跡互為表裏。星號條之大宗為「背捨/解脫」(宋、聖一貫作解脫,四見連段)、「循/修」(石本作修)、「含/舍」(明本作舍)諸單字之逐處重出,皆無涉義理。

校勘總帳(二百二十條全量對帳·底本原樣)。 下依工作底本原樣傳錄——本品校記合計二百二十條,與工作底本工具值機械相合,本目復自底本逐條重算亦得二百二十,兩數獨立相符。條依底本出現序全量列之,內含星號重引十八條(隨條標明所共之注及其所在)、CBETA 依麗藏校訂四條(隨條標記)。品題注、卷題注、兩【經】標記注屬注層不在條目之內,已於第四目與本目專列。三單元之條數分布:之上八十八條、之中五十七條、之下七十五條。異本讀法並列保存,正文仍從現行底本讀法:

校記條(二百二十·底本出現序·星號隨條標明)

  • 〔T25 0678a16〕無【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678a17〕有【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678a21〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0678a23〕令【大】|念【聖】
  • 〔T25 0678a25〕無邊【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678a28〕種種因緣【大】|因緣種種【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0678b05〕含【大】|舍【明】
  • 〔T25 0678b06〕果【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678b06〕含【大】|舍【明】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0678b05〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0678b07〕含【大】|舍【明】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0678b05〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0678b08〕亦【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678b26〕取【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0678b26〕禪【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0678b28〕可【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0678b29〕取【大】|〔-〕【石】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0678b26〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0678c02〕相【大】|相三昧【石】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0677a17〕·跨品·品七十七)
  • 〔T25 0678c02〕所【大】|而【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【石】
  • 〔T25 0678c07〕有【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0678c09〕無【大】|無分【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0678c10〕法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678c11〕匃(K14n0549_p1383c04)【CB】【麗-CB】|匈【大】(CBETA 依麗藏校訂型·見第八目專列)
  • 〔T25 0678c15〕布施【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678c15〕應【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0678c20〕擇【大】|釋【石】
  • 〔T25 0678c21〕訶責【大】|呵嘖【石】
  • 〔T25 0678c24〕時,若【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678c25〕支【大】|肢【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679a01〕提【大】|提若【石】
  • 〔T25 0679a08〕如【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679a16〕養【大】|給【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0679a21〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679a21〕皆【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0679b02〕修【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679b18〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679b19〕取【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0679b22〕珂貝【大】|呵珼【石】
  • 〔T25 0679b24〕若【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0679b29〕念戒【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679c03〕相【大】|相三昧【石】
  • 〔T25 0679c08〕蜜【大】|蜜已【石】
  • 〔T25 0679c09〕後【大】|復【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0679c15〕及【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679c16〕以【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0679c28〕無漏【大】|〔-〕【宋】
  • 〔T25 0680a03〕言:「菩薩與佛有何等異?」【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680a03〕佛言:「有異。菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智,是名為佛。所以者何?【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680a09〕已【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680a16〕循【大】|修【石】
  • 〔T25 0680a16〕觀【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680a16〕循【大】|修【石】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0680a16〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0680a17〕觀【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0680a16〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0680a17〕循【大】|修【石】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0680a16〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0680a18〕觀【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680a19〕所愛【大】|所受【宋】【元】【明】|愛【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680a29〕息【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0680b03〕相【大】|相三昧【石】
  • 〔T25 0680b07〕內【大】|內有【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680b08〕背捨【大】|解脫【宋】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680b08〕背捨【大】|解脫【宋】【聖】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0680b08〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0680b09〕背捨【大】|解脫【宋】【聖】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0680b08〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0680b09〕背捨【大】|解脫【宋】【聖】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0680b08〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0680b09〕一切【大】|有【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680b11〕背捨【大】|解脫【宋】【聖】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0680b08〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0680b13〕法【大】|法相【宋】
  • 〔T25 0680b14〕禪【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680b16〕知【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680b17〕法【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0680b18〕知【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0680b16〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0680b19〕一切【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680b23〕佛【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680b29〕有【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680c19〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680c20〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680c24〕者【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0680c25〕想【大】|相【宋】【元】
  • 〔T25 0680c26〕已【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680c26〕減【大】|咸【聖】
  • 〔T25 0681a03〕奩【大】|𭺈【聖】
  • 〔T25 0681a07〕𨄔,𨄔【大】|腨腨【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681a11〕軟【大】|軟而【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681a13〕停【大】|亭【石】
  • 〔T25 0681a13〕蜹【大】|䖟【石】
  • 〔T25 0681a22〕睫【大】|䀹【宋】|𥇒【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681a24〕肉【大】|肉骨【宋】【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0681a25〕世界【大】|國土【石】
  • 〔T25 0681a25〕則【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0681a27〕明【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681a29〕眾【大】|眾生【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681b01〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0677b16〕·跨品·品七十七)
  • 〔T25 0681b01〕上來已【大】|上已來【宋】【聖】【石】|從上已來【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681b02〕品【大】|〔-〕【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681b13〕中【大】|法【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0681b17〕悲【大】|愁【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0681b26〕貪【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681c09〕次復【大】|復次【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681c14〕問【大】|門【聖】
  • 〔T25 0682a03〕門【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682a21〕三【大】|是三【石】
  • 〔T25 0682a24〕倍【大】|位【聖】
  • 〔T25 0682a26〕見【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682b05〕說【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682b06〕慈【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0682b12〕恩【大】|思【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0682b19〕緣【大】|緣果報【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682c05〕果【大】|欲界果【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682c08〕能【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682c13〕得【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0682c23〕有【大】|又【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683a04〕故【大】|果【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683a07〕相【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0683a08〕相【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0683a07〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0683a17〕為【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0683a17〕法身大【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0683a17〕大【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0683a23〕則【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683a27〕非處【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0683b02〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683b02〕力【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683b10〕而【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683b20〕作【大】|行【石】
  • 〔T25 0683b20〕欲【大】|故【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683b22〕責【大】|嘖【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0683b24〕瘡【大】|創【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0683c07〕報【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0683c15〕語言:「汝【大】|證言【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683c17〕去【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683c22〕利鈍根【大】|根利鈍【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0684a06〕導【大】|道【石】
  • 〔T25 0684a07〕現【大】|現相【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0684a07〕又【大】|入【明】
  • 〔T25 0684a10〕爪【大】|抓【宋】【宮】|瓜【明】|扴【石】
  • 〔T25 0684a14〕腫【大】|朣【明】
  • 〔T25 0684a16〕眾【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684a16〕好【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0684a17〕常【大】|當【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684a22〕密【大】|蜜【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684a23〕導【大】|道【石】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0684a06〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0684a25〕髆(K14n0549_p1391c11)【CB】|[骨*(十/田/寸)](K14n0549_p1391c11)【麗-CB】|𮪴【大】|膊【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(CBETA 依麗藏校訂型·見第八目專列)
  • 〔T25 0684a26〕以【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684a26〕髻【大】|結【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684b02〕相【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684b04〕好【大】|好釋第七六品訖第七十七品上【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b05〕大智度論卷第八十八【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0684b05〕論【大】|經論【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b05〕八【大】|八釋第七十七品訖第七十八品【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684b08〕論【大】|經論【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b08〕四攝品【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b08〕七十八之餘【大】|七十八下訖第七十九品【宋】【元】|七十八之下【明】|七十八品下訖第七十九品【宮】|七十七品下訖第七十八品【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b09〕卷【大】|卷第【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684b13〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b15〕埵【大】|𦖋【元】【明】|㻔【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b16〕鉤鎖【大】|拘𤨏【聖】|拘𭹿【石】
  • 〔T25 0684b21〕持【大】|身【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b22〕逶迤【大】|委陀【石】
  • 〔T25 0684b27〕音【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b27〕臍【大】|齊【石】
  • 〔T25 0684c02〕姝【大】|姝好【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|殊好【石】
  • 〔T25 0684c03〕淨滿【大】|滿淨【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684c04〕與【大】|興【石】
  • 〔T25 0684c07〕羅【大】|那【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0684c10〕足【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684c11〕臍(K14n0549_p1392b15)(T08n0223_p0396a26)【CB】【麗-CB】|齎【大】|臍【宮】(CBETA 依麗藏校訂型·見第八目專列)
  • 〔T25 0684c14〕淨潔【大】|潔淨【石】
  • 〔T25 0684c18〕差【大】|著【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684c18〕生【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684c19〕發【大】|變【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684c21〕相【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684c23〕好【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684c24〕是【大】|是為【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0685a16〕善說字法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685a17〕字法【大】|法【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|字【聖】
  • 〔T25 0685a19〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685a21〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685a28〕眾生不可得【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685b02〕無【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685b10〕空【大】|空眾生不可得故【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0685b10〕空【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0685b17〕空【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685b17〕空【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0685b17〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0685b20〕當知【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0685b28〕何【大】|何分別【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0685c04〕是【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685c13〕所有法不住所有法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685c19〕佛【大】|佛及【石】
  • 〔T25 0685c25〕際【大】|際不異【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0685c27〕異如、不異實際,受、想、行、識,乃至有【大】|〔-〕【聖】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0685c25〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0685c27〕際【大】|際不異【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0686a01〕天【大】|諸天【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686a13〕法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686a13〕諦【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686a24〕果【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686a26〕果【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686a26〕果【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】(星號重引·所共之注在〔T25 0686a26〕·品內)
  • 〔T25 0686b04〕須菩提【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686b12〕邊虛【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686b14〕他【大】|他人【石】
  • 〔T25 0686b21〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686b24〕乃生【大】|乃至【宮】|乃至生【石】
  • 〔T25 0686b27〕立【大】|平【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686c04〕羅【大】|罪【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686c07〕諸【大】|識【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686c20〕明【大】|眼【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686c24〕有【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0687a05〕說【大】|施【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687a11〕異【大】|畢【聖】
  • 〔T25 0687a13〕壞【大】|增【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687a13〕性【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687a15〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687a25〕所有【大】|有【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】|有為法【石】
  • 〔T25 0687b08〕夫【大】|夫人【石】
  • 〔T25 0687b23〕者(K14n0549_p1396b18)【CB】【麗-CB】|道【大】(CBETA 依麗藏校訂型·見第八目專列)
  • 〔T25 0687b28〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687c05〕法【大】|法相【聖】
  • 〔T25 0687c07〕也【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687c16〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687c16〕悶【大】|問【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687c16〕罣【大】|量【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0687c17〕無礙【大】|礙【聖】|無𮤉【石】
  • 〔T25 0687c17〕無【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0687c17〕性【大】|性釋第七十八品【聖】|性釋第七十七品竟【石】

I. Structural Placement

Within the sequence in which the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa comments on the Larger Sūtra, this chapter belongs to the section of the "Commentary on the Remaining Chapters", spanning Fascicles 88 and 89. The chapter title, 「大智度論釋四攝品第七十八」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Four Means of Gathering, the Seventy-eighth"〔T25 0677c26〕, is placed within Fascicle 88, not raised as a title at the head of a fascicle—Fascicle 88 opens with the chapter title of the preceding chapter, "The Six Similes", the Seventy-seventh; the preceding chapter ends with the sentence 「上以一念中能具諸波羅蜜,此以諸法雖空無相而能具諸波羅蜜為異」 tr. "Above, the perfections can be made complete within a single thought; here, although dharmas are empty and signless, the perfections can be made complete—this is the difference"〔T25 0677c24〕, and this chapter's title follows straight on after it. This chapter is therefore of the type ‘tied within the fascicle · not tied to the fascicle-head’, precisely the reverse of the preceding chapter's ‘the chapter title is the fascicle title’.

The fascicle-end title of Fascicle 88, 「大智度論卷第八十八」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Eighty-eight"〔T25 0684b05〕, comes before this chapter is finished; Fascicle 89 starts again with the continuing title 「大智度論釋四攝品第七十八之餘」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Four Means of Gathering, the Seventy-eighth, the Remainder"〔T25 0684b08〕, and repeats the author's signature 「聖者龍樹菩薩造」 tr. "Composed by the noble Bodhisattva Nāgārjuna"〔T25 0684b11〕 and the translator's signature 「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」 tr. "Translated by Kumārajīva, Tripiṭaka master of Kucha, in the Later Qin"〔T25 0684b12〕. The continuing title reads 「之餘」 tr. "the remainder" and not 「之下」 tr. "the last part", of the same type as the fascicle-spanning of Chapters 40, 41, 43, 45, and 47; recorded as it is. The author's signature reads 「聖者龍樹菩薩造」 tr. "Composed by the noble Bodhisattva Nāgārjuna"—compared with the 「聖者龍樹造」 tr. "Composed by the noble Nāgārjuna" of Chapter 47 and Chapter 77, it has the two Chinese characters 「菩薩」 tr. "bodhisattva" more; this belongs to small fascicle-by-fascicle differences in the wording of the base text's author's signature, recorded as it is without forcing an explanation.

The body of the chapter ends with the passage 「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中;於法性中不疑、不悶而說法,無罣、無礙、無遮,是則通達法性」 tr. "One who thoroughly penetrates does not grasp at the mark of the nature of dharmas and does not abide within the nature of dharmas; within the nature of dharmas he teaches the Dharma without doubt and without oppression, without hindrance, without obstruction, without blocking: this is to penetrate the nature of dharmas"〔T25 0687c15〕, and stops at〔T25 0687c17〕; the chapter title of the next chapter, "Thorough Penetration", the Seventy-ninth, begins at〔T25 0687c18〕, and its sūtra text 「云何菩薩善達諸法相」 tr. "How does the bodhisattva thoroughly penetrate the marks of dharmas?"〔T25 0687c19〕 starts a new question; it joins in the thread of the text with the 「善通達法性」 tr. "thoroughly penetrating the nature of dharmas" of this chapter's last passage, while the chapter boundary stays clear.

The whole chapter has fourteen thousand and ten pure Chinese characters (the tool value agrees with this section's passage-by-passage recount, with no difference—unlike the count differences of a dozen or so characters seen again and again in the ledgers of Chapters 38 to 47). Divided by the fascicle boundary and the boundary between sūtra and treatise sections into three units: the First Part (the 【經】 section of Fascicle 88) four thousand nine hundred and fifty-four, the Middle Part (the 【論】 section of Fascicle 88) four thousand two hundred and thirty-six, the Last Part (the whole of Fascicle 89) four thousand eight hundred and twenty; the sum of the three numbers agrees precisely with the value for the whole chapter, with no character lost. The cut points are all an existing fascicle boundary or a 【經】【論】 marker; no new boundary has been made.

The names of this edition's three units and the 「之上」 tr. "first part" and 「之下」 tr. "last part" in a variant text's title notes of the base text do not correspond (the place most easily confused, set out first). In the base text the Ming edition reads at the chapter title 「釋四攝品第七十八之上」 tr. "Commentary on the Chapter on the Four Means of Gathering, the Seventy-eighth, First Part", and at the continuing title of Fascicle 89 「七十八之下」 tr. "Seventy-eighth, Last Part"—the Ming edition's transmission itself divides this chapter in two at the fascicle boundary, as first part and last part; this edition, because the count of pure Chinese characters exceeds the usual amount, takes the 【論】 marker within Fascicle 88 as a further boundary, making the three units of First Part, Middle Part, and Last Part. The two ways of division differ, and the same names point to different things; the reader takes the fascicle boundary as the standard: this edition's First Part and Middle Part together correspond to the Ming edition's 「之上」 tr. "first part", and this edition's Last Part is the Ming edition's 「之下」 tr. "last part". This is a division at the level of presentation, not a variant reading of a different text; recorded to guard against misreading.

The structure within the chapter is two sūtra sections and two treatise sections: 【經】〔T25 0677c27〕, 【論】〔T25 0681b01〕, 【經】〔T25 0684b13〕, 【論】〔T25 0686b21〕. The collation situation of the four markers differs pair by pair: both 【論】 markers enter collation entries (the former is absent in the five texts of the Song, Yuan, Ming, Palace, and Shōgozō, the latter is absent in the three texts of the Song, Palace, and Shōgozō), whereas the two 【經】 markers do not—at the place of Sūtra ① the base text has no note, and at the place of Sūtra ②, though there is a note (recording that the three texts of the Song, Palace, and Shōgozō lack this marker and that the Ishiyama text does not divide the fascicle), it does not form a collation entry. Whether a marker is present belongs to the layer of the base text's transmission; the structural count still follows the base text's labels.

The density of question and answer in the treatise sections: in Treatise ① (the Middle Part) 「問曰」 tr. "Question" and 「答曰」 tr. "Answer" are each seen twenty times and 「有人言」 tr. "someone says" eight times; in Treatise ② (the Last Part) 「問曰」 tr. "Question" and 「答曰」 tr. "Answer" are each seen four times and 「有人言」 tr. "someone says" once. In the latter half of Treatise ② there is in addition a passage of exchange unfolded in the named forms 「須菩提問」 tr. "Subhūti asks", 「佛可須菩提言」 tr. "the Buddha approves Subhūti's words", 「須菩提言」 tr. "Subhūti says", and 「佛言」 tr. "the Buddha says" (from〔T25 0686c09〕 to〔T25 0687c08〕), which is not the usual form of 「問曰」 tr. "Question" and 「答曰」 tr. "Answer"—it is judged to be the treatise-author's quasi-dialogue drawn from the sūtra (the treatise-author continues to set out the meaning of the treatise under the names of figures in the sūtra; it is neither a further citation of the sūtra text nor the sūtra text itself). This section lists its form separately; the vernacular layer translates directly according to the labels of the base text, adding nothing and removing nothing, and the exposition layer makes clear that it is from the treatise-author's pen.

II. Terms Examined

The names and marks of this chapter take the four means of gathering as the main cord and the two gifts as its meshes, running on below through the meanings of the marks and minor signs, the gates of letters, the two truths, and the two emptinesses. Entry by entry this section records their definitions in the base text, without fixing a reading in their place.

The four means of gathering (giving · kind speech · beneficial action · shared endeavour). The general heading comes in Sūtra ①: 「以四事攝取眾生。何等為四?布施、愛語、利益、同事」 tr. "By four things he gathers in beings. What are the four? Giving, kind speech, beneficial action, and shared endeavour"〔T25 0679b18〕. The explanations of the four things lie in two units: the one thing of giving is spoken of broadly in Sūtra ① (the two gates of the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma, detailed below), while the other three things are each gathered in one sentence only in Sūtra ②—「菩薩摩訶薩以六波羅蜜為眾生說法」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva teaches the Dharma for beings by the six perfections"〔T25 0685a03〕 is kind speech, 「菩薩摩訶薩長夜教眾生,令行六波羅蜜」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva through the long night teaches beings and makes them practise the six perfections"〔T25 0685a06〕 is beneficial action, 「菩薩摩訶薩以五神通力故種種變化,入五道中,與眾生同事」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, by the power of the five supernormal powers, transforms himself in all kinds of ways, enters the five destinies, and shares in endeavour with beings"〔T25 0685a07〕 is shared endeavour. The weight given to the names of the four means of gathering differs widely (giving runs to more than three pages, the other three to only three sentences), and the treatise-author himself sets a question and answer to explain why (see Section V).

The two gifts (the gift of wealth · the gift of Dharma). 「菩薩以二種施攝取眾生:財施、法施」 tr. "The bodhisattva gathers in beings by two kinds of giving: the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma"〔T25 0679b20〕. The items of the gift of wealth run from gold, silver, and precious jewels, food, drink, and clothing, on to 「若以己身,給施眾生」 tr. "or giving his own body to beings"; having given, he always follows it with teaching (the three refuges, the five precepts, the one-day precepts, the four dhyānas, the four immeasurables, and the four formless absorptions, the six recollections, the contemplation of impurity, ānāpāna, and so on up to the thirty-seven limbs of the path, the four fruits of the śramaṇa, the pratyekabuddha path, and anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi), and its closing sentence is 「財施已,後教令得無上安隱涅槃」 tr. "having given the gift of wealth, he afterwards teaches them and makes them obtain the unsurpassed nirvāṇa of peace and security"—the gift of wealth does not stop at the thing; it takes the thing as a gate and ends in nirvāṇa; this is the backbone of the meaning of the gift of wealth in this chapter.

The worldly gift of Dharma · the world-transcending gift of Dharma. 「法施有二種:一者、世間,二者、出世間」 tr. "The gift of Dharma is of two kinds: first, worldly; second, world-transcending"〔T25 0679c11〕. The items of the worldly gift of Dharma are 「不淨觀、安那般那念、四禪、四無量心、四無色定」 tr. "the contemplation of impurity, mindfulness of ānāpāna, the four dhyānas, the four immeasurable minds, and the four formless absorptions"〔T25 0679c13〕, and a sentence is attached that judges what it gathers: 「如是等世間法,及諸餘共凡夫所行法,是名世間法施」 tr. "Such worldly dharmas as these, and all the other dharmas practised in common with ordinary people, are named the worldly gift of Dharma"〔T25 0679c14〕—the criterion lies in ‘practised in common with ordinary people’. The world-transcending gift of Dharma, by contrast, takes the noble dharmas without outflows as its substance.

The noble dharma without outflows · the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows. Sūtra ① defines it twice, the earlier and the later different yet not contradicting each other. The first speaks by the items of dharmas: 「聖無漏法者,三十七助道法、三解脫門」 tr. "The noble dharmas without outflows are the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path and the three gates of liberation"〔T25 0679c19〕; the second speaks by knowledge: the knowledge of the four fruits, the knowledge of the pratyekabuddha path, the knowledge of the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path, the knowledge of the six perfections, and so on up to the knowledge of great kindness and great compassion—「如是等一切法,若世間若出世間智慧、若有漏若無漏、若有為若無為,是法中一切種智,是名菩薩摩訶薩聖無漏法」 tr. "All such dharmas as these—whether worldly or world-transcending wisdom, whether with outflows or without outflows, whether conditioned or unconditioned—the omniscience of all kinds within these dharmas: this is named the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's noble dharma without outflows". Its fruit is but one: 「斷一切煩惱習,是名聖無漏法果」 tr. "the cutting off of all the afflictions and their habitual residues; this is named the fruit of the noble dharma without outflows"〔T25 0679c29〕. The earlier saying raises its items, the later raises its knowledge; the fruit is one thing only, the cutting off of the residues and nothing more.

World-transcending dharmas not shared with ordinary people. Sūtra ① lists the items at great length (the thirty-seven limbs of the path from the four foundations of mindfulness on, the three samādhi, the eight liberations, the nine successive absorptions, the ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, the eighteen unshared dharmas, the thirty-two marks, the eighty minor marks, and the five hundred dhāraṇī gates); among them the three things of the nine successive absorptions, the thirty-two marks, and the eighty minor marks are in fact held in common with the world, so Treatise ① sets a question to challenge this, and answers that each of the three things has its own unshared point: the absorption of the cessation of feeling and perception 「但聖人能得」 tr. "only the sages can obtain"〔T25 0682c27〕; the unshared point of the four dhyānas and the four formless absorptions lies in their being cultivated in sequence 「不雜餘心」 tr. "not mixed with other minds"; the unshared point of the marks and minor signs lies in 「名字雖同,而威德、具足、淨潔、得處則不同於佛」 tr. "though the names are the same, in majesty, completeness, purity, and the place of their obtaining they are not the same as the Buddha's"〔T25 0683a02〕, and 「八十隨形好具足,唯佛菩薩有之」 tr. "the eighty minor marks complete—only buddhas and bodhisattvas have them"〔T25 0683a09〕. The criterion lies not in whether the names and marks are present, but in majesty and completeness and in the source of the retribution.

The thirty-two marks · the eighty minor marks. The thirty-two marks are listed mark by mark at the end of Sūtra ①, with the closing sentence 「是三十二相,佛身成就」 tr. "These thirty-two marks the Buddha's body accomplishes"〔T25 0681a24〕; the eighty minor marks are listed item by item at the head of Sūtra ②, from 「一者、無見頂」 tr. "first, the crown that cannot be seen"〔T25 0684b13〕 to 「八十者、手足有德相」 tr. "eightieth, hands and feet bearing the mark of virtue"〔T25 0684c23〕, with the closing sentence 「須菩提!是八十隨形好,佛身成就」 tr. "Subhūti! These eighty minor marks the Buddha's body accomplishes"〔T25 0684c24〕. Among the eighty minor marks the two items 「二十一者、識滿足」 tr. "twenty-first, consciousness full"〔T25 0684b22〕 and 「二十三者、住處安,無能動者」 tr. "twenty-third, secure in his dwelling-place, none able to move him"〔T25 0684b23〕 are not of the kind of bodily marks, and Treatise ② sets questions specially for them (see Section III and Section V).

The Dharma body · the fleshly body. Treatise ① explains why the marks and minor signs are spoken of only when the treatise is about to close: 「佛有二種身:法身、生身。於二身中,法身為大」 tr. "The Buddha has two kinds of body: the Dharma body and the fleshly body. Of the two bodies, the Dharma body is the greater"〔T25 0683a16〕; because the Dharma body's benefit is much, it is spoken of broadly first; 「是生身相好莊嚴是聖無漏法果報」 tr. "this adornment of the fleshly body with marks and minor signs is the retribution of the noble dharmas without outflows"〔T25 0683a18〕, and so in sequence it is placed last. This division of the two bodies is also the ground of Treatise ①'s explanation of why a sūtra passage recurs: 「先說生身菩薩,今說變化身。先說一國土,今說無量世界」 tr. "Before, the bodhisattva in a fleshly body was spoken of; now the transformation body is spoken of. Before, one land was spoken of; now immeasurable worlds are spoken of"〔T25 0681c18〕.

Nature · desire (two dharmas included in the ten powers). Treatise ①, explaining the 「知一切世間種種無數性」 tr. "knowing the various and countless natures of all the world" among the Buddha's ten powers, sets up separately a distinction between nature and desire: 「性先有,欲得因緣而生。譬如先有瘡,得觸因緣則血出」 tr. "Nature exists first; desire arises on obtaining causes and conditions. It is as there is first a sore, and on obtaining the condition of contact, blood comes out"〔T25 0683b23〕; 「性在內,欲在外。性重,欲輕。性難除,欲易捨。性深,欲淺」 tr. "Nature is within, desire is without. Nature is heavy, desire is light. Nature is hard to remove, desire is easy to give up. Nature is deep, desire is shallow"〔T25 0683b25〕—and judges the difference in their karmic retribution (deeds done by nature must receive retribution; deeds done by desire need not receive retribution). Below it a divergent saying is further recorded: 「欲常習增長,遂成為性;性亦能生欲」 tr. "Desire, constantly practised, grows and so becomes nature; nature too can give rise to desire"〔T25 0683b27〕—the two sayings are recorded side by side without judgement.

The forty-two gates of letters · the dharma without letters. Sūtra ② teaches beings, 「善男子!當善學分別諸字,亦當善知一字乃至四十二字」 tr. "Good man! You should train well in distinguishing the letters, and should also know well one letter and so on up to forty-two letters"〔T25 0685a11〕; the form of their mutual inclusion is 「一字皆入四十二字,四十二字亦入一字」 tr. "each one letter enters all forty-two letters, and the forty-two letters also enter one letter"〔T25 0685a14〕, their sequence is 「善學四十二字已,能善說字法;善說字法已,善說無字法」 tr. "having trained well in the forty-two letters, he can speak well of the dharma of letters; having spoken well of the dharma of letters, he speaks well of the dharma without letters"〔T25 0685a15〕, and their conclusion is 「過一切名字故,名為佛法」 tr. "because it passes beyond all names and letters, it is named the Buddha's Dharma"〔T25 0685a19〕. Treatise ② explains it by a simile of counting, and sets up its doctrinal sequence: 「善知字故,善知諸法名;善知諸法名故,善知諸法義。無字即是諸法實相義」 tr. "Because he knows letters well, he knows well the names of dharmas; because he knows well the names of dharmas, he knows well the meaning of dharmas. Being without letters is precisely the meaning of the real mark of all dharmas"〔T25 0686c06〕—letters are the gate, being without letters is the meaning; without letters one does not enter, and stopping at letters one does not arrive.

The five supernormal powers obtained as retribution · the six supernormal powers of retribution. Subhūti's question in Sūtra ② reads 「云何住報得五神通為眾生說法」 tr. "How does he, abiding in the five supernormal powers obtained as retribution, teach the Dharma for beings?"〔T25 0685a27〕, while Treatise ②, restating the same question, reads 「云何菩薩住果報六神通,為眾生說諸法」 tr. "How does the bodhisattva, abiding in the six supernormal powers of retribution, teach dharmas for beings?"〔T25 0686c10〕—the sūtra says five, the treatise says six; the numbers are not the same. Elsewhere in Sūtra ① there is also the wording 「住報得六波羅蜜中及住報得五神通、三十七助道法」 tr. "abiding within the six perfections obtained as retribution, and abiding in the five supernormal powers obtained as retribution and the thirty-seven dharmas that aid the path"〔T25 0678b20〕, which agrees with Sūtra ②'s 「五」 tr. "five". The treatise's 「六」 tr. "six" and the sūtra text's 「五」 tr. "five" stand together in one and the same base text; recorded as it is without forcing an explanation, and without altering one side by the other.

The two truths (worldly truth · the highest meaning). The gathering point of Sūtra ②: 「世諦故,分別說有果報,非第一義」 tr. "By reason of worldly truth, retribution is spoken of with distinctions; it is not the highest meaning"〔T25 0686a04〕; the mark of the highest meaning is 「是第一義,實無有相,無有分別,亦無言說」 tr. "This highest meaning truly has no mark, has no discrimination, and has no speech"〔T25 0686a05〕. That its distinctions can be established hangs on knowing and not knowing: 「以凡夫人實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果,云何當有諸果」 tr. "Because ordinary people really do not know worldly truth, do not know the truth of the highest meaning, do not know the path, and do not know how to distinguish the fruits of the path, how should they have the fruits?"〔T25 0686a15〕; 「聖人知世諦、知第一義諦,有道、有修道,以是故聖人差別有諸果」 tr. "The sages know worldly truth, know the truth of the highest meaning, have the path, and have the cultivation of the path; therefore the sages have the various fruits with distinctions"〔T25 0686a17〕. Treatise ②, taking this up, sets up one sentence of general judgement: 「第一義中無縛無解,世諦故有縛有解」 tr. "Within the highest meaning there is neither bondage nor release; by reason of worldly truth there is bondage and there is release"〔T25 0686c23〕.

The two emptinesses (ultimate emptiness · beginningless emptiness). Sūtra ① sets them up at the very opening of its teaching: 「住二空中——畢竟空、無始空,為眾生說法」 tr. "abiding within the two emptinesses—ultimate emptiness and beginningless emptiness—he teaches the Dharma for beings"〔T25 0678a07〕; Treatise ① explains their division of office: 「畢竟空破諸法;無始空破眾生相」 tr. "Ultimate emptiness breaks all dharmas; beginningless emptiness breaks the mark of beings"〔T25 0681b19〕. Treatise ② again sets a question why only the two emptinesses are spoken of here, and answers: 「一切所有:若法、若眾生。若言畢竟空,則破諸法;若言無始空,則破眾生」 tr. "All that there is: whether dharmas or beings. If one speaks of ultimate emptiness, it breaks all dharmas; if one speaks of beginningless emptiness, it breaks beings"〔T25 0687a25〕, and with a simile of fire distinguishes their depth: 「餘空如火燒木,猶有灰燼;畢竟空無灰無燼」 tr. "The other emptinesses are like fire burning wood, which still leaves ashes and embers; ultimate emptiness has no ashes and no embers"〔T25 0687a29〕. Below it a divergent saying is recorded: 「若說十八空無咎,略說故說二空」 tr. "If the eighteen emptinesses were spoken of there would be no fault; it is to speak briefly that the two emptinesses are spoken of"〔T25 0687b01〕—the two sayings are recorded side by side without judgement.

The dharma of not abiding (the nature of dharmas · suchness · the limit of reality). At the end of Sūtra ② four layers of not abiding are set up: 「無所有法不住無所有法,所有法不住所有法,自性法不住自性法,他性法不住他性法」 tr. "The dharma without anything existent does not abide in the dharma without anything existent; the existent dharma does not abide in the existent dharma; the dharma of self-nature does not abide in the dharma of self-nature; the dharma of other-nature does not abide in the dharma of other-nature"〔T25 0685c13〕, and the reason for it is 「是一切法皆不可得故。不可得法當住何處」 tr. "because all these dharmas are unfindable. Where should an unfindable dharma abide?" Treatise ② takes it up with three similes (see Section III). The whole chapter is gathered in 「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中」 tr. "One who thoroughly penetrates does not grasp at the mark of the nature of dharmas and does not abide within the nature of dharmas"〔T25 0687c15〕—the mark of thorough penetration lies precisely in not grasping and not abiding.

III. Similes and Stories

The similes of this chapter lie mostly in the treatise sections; the sūtra sections have only the one simile of the conjured person. They can be divided into four kinds: those explaining the absence of anger and regret, those explaining the ten powers, those explaining the marks and minor signs, and those explaining not abiding.

The simile of a person conjured by the Buddha who conjures conjured people (Sūtra ② · the only sūtra simile in the whole chapter). 「譬如佛所化人,化人復化作無量千萬億人」 tr. "It is as a person conjured by the Buddha, and the conjured person further conjures immeasurable thousands of myriads of koṭi of people"〔T25 0685b24〕; the conjured person teaches giving, keeping morality, and so on up to the four formless absorptions, and yet 「是化人無心、無心數法,云何分別破壞諸法」 tr. "this conjured person is without mind and without mental-factor dharmas; how could he discriminate and destroy dharmas?"〔T25 0685b29〕—the bodhisattva teaches the Dharma for beings without destroying the marks of dharmas, just as the conjured person speaks and is without mind. This simile appears again in Sūtra ② at its gathering point: 「譬如佛所化人布施,亦不受布施報,但為度眾生故」 tr. "It is as a person conjured by the Buddha gives, and does not receive the reward of giving either, but only for the sake of delivering beings"〔T25 0686b15〕—one simile used twice: the first makes clear speaking without discrimination, the second makes clear practising without receiving the reward.

The simile of the great amnesty (taking up the meaning of ‘not delivering the three evil destinies to the last one’). Treatise ① answers why the three evil destinies are not wholly emptied: 「菩薩雖無邊無量,眾生倍多無量」 tr. "Though bodhisattvas are boundless and immeasurable, beings are immeasurably many times more"〔T25 0682a23〕, 「菩薩隨眾生可度因緣,若於三惡道中有餘功德者,菩薩則度」 tr. "The bodhisattva follows the causes and conditions by which beings can be delivered; if within the three evil destinies there are those with remaining merit, the bodhisattva delivers them"〔T25 0682a24〕, and at the end attaches a simile: 「譬如大赦,及者得脫,不及者則不蒙」 tr. "It is as a great amnesty: those it reaches are freed, those it does not reach receive nothing"〔T25 0682a27〕—that the amnesty does not reach someone is not because the amnesty is not universal, but because the conditions of the one to receive it are not complete.

The simile of the fragrant rice (citing the Vimalakīrti Sūtra · taking up the meaning of ‘being delivered by eating the bodhisattva's flesh’). Treatise ① answers why beings who eat the bodhisattva's flesh are on the contrary delivered: it first brings out the original vow, 「若有眾生噉我肉者,當令得度」 tr. "If there are beings who eat my flesh, may they come to be delivered"〔T25 0682a29〕, next takes as examples that form, sound, smell, and touch each bring delight or anger, and at the end cites the sūtra as proof: 「服食香飯,七日得道者,有不得者」 tr. "Of those who ate the fragrant rice, some obtained the path in seven days, and some did not"〔T25 0682b05〕—it is not by eating the flesh that they are delivered, it is by giving rise to a kind mind that they are delivered; the judgement of this chapter is extremely clear.

The simile of the Medicine King making his body a lamp (citing the Lotus Sūtra · taking up the meaning of 「以身布施」 tr. "giving the body"). 「以身為燈供養於佛,爾乃足滿」 tr. "Making his body a lamp as an offering to the Buddha—only then was he satisfied"〔T25 0682b10〕—making offerings with outer things and precious jewels, his intent was still not satisfied; only with his body was he satisfied. The treatise-author also explains the principle himself: when people obtain outer things they do not take it as a kindness; 「得其身時,乃能驚感」 tr. "when they obtain his body, only then can they be startled and moved".

The simile of the good physician observing the sickness (taking up the meaning of 「處非處力」 tr. "the power of knowing what is possible and what is impossible"). With the first power the Buddha reckons which beings can be delivered and which cannot, 「譬如良醫,觀其病相,審定知其可活則治之,不可活者則捨之」 tr. "as a good physician looks at the marks of the sickness and, judging and knowing for certain that the patient can live, treats him, and where he cannot live, gives him up"〔T25 0683b05〕—giving up is not without compassion; towards those who cannot be delivered he 「修捨心」 tr. "cultivates the mind of equanimity".

The simile of the sore that bleeds on contact · the simile of the heat of fire and the wetness of water (taking up the meaning of ‘the distinction between nature and desire’). 「性先有,欲得因緣而生。譬如先有瘡,得觸因緣則血出」 tr. "Nature exists first; desire arises on obtaining causes and conditions. It is as there is first a sore, and on obtaining the condition of contact, blood comes out"〔T25 0683b23〕; and answering why beings do not all have wholesome desires: 「如火熱性、水濕性,不應責其所以」 tr. "As with the hot nature of fire and the wet nature of water, one should not demand its reason"〔T25 0683b21〕—the reason of a nature cannot be asked further; to ask it is to go on without end.

The matter of Śāriputra in the late afternoon (a story of origins · taking up the meaning of ‘the last three powers belong only to the Buddha’). There was a man who was due that very day to obtain arhatship; at midday Śāriputra told him, 「汝無得道因緣」 tr. "You have no causes and conditions for obtaining the path", and gave him up without delivering him; 「晡時,佛以宿命神通見過去八萬劫前得道因緣」 tr. "In the late afternoon the Buddha, by the supernormal power of knowing former lives, saw causes and conditions for obtaining the path from eighty thousand kalpas in the past"〔T25 0683c16〕, and that same day taught him the Dharma, and the man obtained the path—the knowledge of the śrāvakas has its limit, and so the ten powers belong only to the Buddha.

The mark of a rākṣasa · the mark of a water-bird · the webbed hands of the bodhisattva of the land of Jibin (taking up the meaning of ‘the marks are shown according to what is liked’). Treatise ① records four sayings on whether the marks and minor signs are fixed or not fixed; the second saying holds that the marks are shown according to what beings like, and its proofs are two. The first makes it clear by a counter-example: 「又眾生不貴纖長指及網縵,以長指利爪為羅剎相,以網縵為水鳥相」 tr. "Moreover, beings do not prize slender long fingers or webbing; they take long fingers and sharp nails as the mark of a rākṣasa, and webbing as the mark of a water-bird"〔T25 0684a09〕; the second is an actual event: after 「如罽賓國彌帝」 tr. "as in the land of Jibin, Midi"〔T25 0684a11〕 comes one created character of the base text (listed separately below), continuing with 「力利菩薩手網縵,其父惡以為怪」 tr. "-lili Bodhisattva had webbed hands, and his father loathed it as a portent"〔T25 0684a12〕; his father cut it with a knife, saying, 「我子何緣如鳥」 tr. "Why should my son be like a bird?"〔T25 0684a13〕—one and the same mark is here the mark of a Buddha and there the mark of a bird.

The created character of the base text, listed separately. At〔T25 0684a12〕, after the two Chinese characters 「彌帝」 tr. "Midi" and before the two Chinese characters 「力利」 tr. "lili", there is one created character of the base text (CBETA number CB01417), whose composed-character form is that of CB01417. This edition transmits its composed-character form as it stands, and does not take any normalised single-character form—this is the only created character in this chapter, checked character by character and in place.

The colours shown in the Sūtra of the Secret Traces (citing a sūtra · taking up the meaning of the fourth saying). 「或現金色、或現銀色、或日月星宿色,或長、或短,隨可引導眾生則為現相」 tr. "He shows a golden colour or shows a silver colour, or the colour of the sun, the moon, and the constellations, or tall, or short; according to how beings can be led, he shows marks for them"〔T25 0684a22〕; and the customs of the land at that time are taken as proof: 「天竺國人于今故治肩髆令厚大、頭上皆以有髻為好」 tr. "The people of India even now still work on their shoulders to make them thick and large, and all take having a topknot on the head as beautiful"〔T25 0684a25〕—a trace of Kumārajīva's translation bureau explaining the marks and minor signs of that land by the sense of beauty of this land; recorded as it is. Its closing sentence, 「是故佛隨眾生所好而為現相好。如是等,無有常定」 tr. "Therefore the Buddha shows the marks and minor signs according to what beings like. Such as these have nothing constant and fixed"〔T25 0684a16〕, stands over against the third saying, 「此三十二相實定,以神通力變化身,隨眾生所好而為現相」 tr. "These thirty-two marks are really fixed; by the power of supernormal powers he transforms his body and shows marks according to what beings like"〔T25 0684a17〕—the four sayings are recorded side by side without judgement.

The simile of the white-robed warrior firmly holding his weapons (taking up the meaning of 「住處安」 tr. "secure in his dwelling-place"). Treatise ② explains the 「住處安」 tr. "secure in his dwelling-place" among the eighty minor marks: 「住處安者,如白衣勇士,牢持器仗,安據住處,則不可動」 tr. "Secure in his dwelling-place is like a white-robed warrior who, firmly holding his weapons and securely occupying his place, cannot be moved"〔T25 0686b28〕, and attaches the mark of leaving home: 「又出家時,魔民、惡鬼無能動轉令退敗者」 tr. "Moreover, at the time of leaving home, neither Māra's people nor evil ghosts can move or turn him and make him fall back defeated"〔T25 0686b29〕.

Space does not abide in space · fire does not abide within fire (taking up the meaning of 「不住法」 tr. "the dharma of not abiding"). Treatise ② explains Sūtra ②'s four layers of not abiding, making them clear by three similes: the dharma without anything existent does not abide in what is without anything existent, 「譬如虛空不住虛空」 tr. "It is as space does not abide in space"〔T25 0686c29〕; the dharma of self-nature does not abide in the dharma of self-nature, 「譬如火不住火中」 tr. "It is as fire does not abide within fire"〔T25 0687a01〕. Other-nature not abiding in other-nature takes as its simile that within the nature of water there is no nature of fire, and attaches a phrase, 「又他性不定故」 tr. "and moreover because other-nature is not fixed".

The simile of oil from sesame · the simile of the two people who do not arrive (taking up the meaning of 「修道得果不」 tr. "whether one obtains the fruit by cultivating the path"). Treatise ② explains why the Buddha earlier said that cultivating the path one obtains the fruit and now says one does not obtain it: 「佛先說,非著心;今須菩提以著心問,欲從道中出果,如麻中出油」 tr. "What the Buddha said earlier was not with a clinging mind; now Subhūti asks with a clinging mind, wishing to bring the fruit out from within the path, as oil is brought out from sesame"〔T25 0687b18〕; and, fearing that the hearers would on the contrary hold to not cultivating, he sets the simile of the two people: 「譬如二人欲有所到:一者、住,不行;二者、失道。二俱不到」 tr. "It is as two people who wish to reach somewhere: one stays and does not go; one loses the road. Neither of the two arrives"〔T25 0687b22〕—staying and losing the road alike fail to arrive; not cultivating and cultivating with a clinging mind alike are without fruit. The judgement lies in 「若心取相修道,雖有攝心禪定樂,無有道果」 tr. "if the mind grasps at marks and cultivates the path, though there is the pleasure of meditative concentration that gathers the mind, there is no fruit of the path"〔T25 0687b24〕.

IV. The Sūtra Passage Explained

A full ledger of the three makings of the chapter title (base text twelve characters · Ming edition ten characters · Palace edition thirteen characters · Ishiyama text eighteen characters together with a fascicle record). The note on the chapter title〔T25 0677c26〕, in a full ledger character by character, is as follows. The base text (Taishō) reads 「大智度論釋四攝品第七十八」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Four Means of Gathering, the Seventy-eighth", twelve characters; the Ming edition reads 「釋四攝品第七十八之上」 tr. "Commentary on the Chapter on the Four Means of Gathering, the Seventy-eighth, First Part", ten characters, lacking the four-character prefix 「大智度論」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa" and adding the two characters 「之上」 tr. "first part"; the Palace edition reads 「大智度論釋第七十八品四攝品」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Seventy-eighth Chapter, the Chapter on the Four Means of Gathering", thirteen characters, with a different word order but the same chapter number; the Ishiyama text reads 「摩訶般若波羅蜜品第七十七四攝品八十九」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā, Chapter the Seventy-seventh, Chapter on the Four Means of Gathering, Eighty-nine", eighteen characters, its chapter number reading 「第七十七」 tr. "the Seventy-seventh", one step fewer than the base text, and within the same note it records separately 「卷第八十九首」 tr. "head of Fascicle Eighty-nine". This note belongs to the note layer of the chapter title and is not within the two hundred and twenty collation entries, so it is listed separately in this section and in Section VIII.

The Ishiyama text's fascicle numbering forms a system of its own (one chapter one fascicle · three records interlocking head and tail). Before and after the range of this chapter the Ishiyama text leaves three records in all: at the end of the preceding chapter〔T25 0677c25〕 it records 「卷第八十八終」 tr. "end of Fascicle Eighty-eight", at the chapter title it records 「卷第八十九首」 tr. "head of Fascicle Eighty-nine", at the end of the chapter〔T25 0687c17〕 it records 「卷第八十九終」 tr. "end of Fascicle Eighty-nine", and at the place where the title of the next chapter, "Thorough Penetration", begins it records 「卷第九十首」 tr. "head of Fascicle Ninety". The four records interlock; the Ishiyama text makes the whole of this chapter alone its Fascicle 89—entirely different from the fascicle division of the base text (beginning within Fascicle 88 and crossing into Fascicle 89). The Ishiyama text further records 「不分卷」 tr. "no division of the fascicle" at the fascicle-end title of Fascicle 88 and records 「不分卷」 tr. "no division of the fascicle" at the marker of Sūtra ②, that is, the Ishiyama text does not have the base text's boundary between Fascicles 88 and 89. This belongs to a difference at the level of fascicle numbering, not a variant reading of the chapter number; recorded as it is without judgement.

The continuation of the chapter number one step lower (seen only in the Ishiyama text · the Shōgozō text not uniform in two directions). The Ishiyama text's chapter number one step lower continues without break the pattern consistent through Chapters 44 to 47: the chapter title reads 「第七十七」 tr. "the Seventy-seventh", and the record at the end of the chapter reads 「性釋第七十七品竟」 tr. "nature. The commentary on the Seventy-seventh Chapter is finished". The Shōgozō text, at the fascicle title and the continuing title, likewise reads one step lower (the note on the fascicle-end title of Fascicle 88 reads 「好釋第七六品訖第七十七品上」 tr. "marks. Commentary on the Seventy-sixth Chapter to the Seventy-seventh Chapter, First Part", the note on the continuing title of Fascicle 89 reads 「七十七品下訖第七十八品」 tr. "Seventy-seventh Chapter, Last Part, to the Seventy-eighth Chapter"), while at the record at the end of the chapter it reads 「性釋第七十八品」 tr. "nature. Commentary on the Seventy-eighth Chapter"—the Shōgozō text's end record is not at the same step as its fascicle titles. The texts each have their own sources; running in the same direction, they need not run in step; recorded without judgement, and the whole system is not inferred from one place.

The five makings of the fascicle title and the continuing title. The fascicle-end title of Fascicle 88〔T25 0684b05〕 has three notes: the Ishiyama text lacks this fascicle title; for the character 「論」 tr. "treatise" the Shōgozō text reads 「經論」 tr. "sūtra-treatise"; for the character 「八」 tr. "eight" the Palace edition reads 「八釋第七十七品訖第七十八品」 tr. "eight. Commentary on the Seventy-seventh Chapter to the Seventy-eighth Chapter". The continuing title of Fascicle 89〔T25 0684b08〕 has four notes: for the character 「論」 tr. "treatise" the Shōgozō text reads 「經論」 tr. "sūtra-treatise"; the three characters 「四攝品」 tr. "Chapter on the Four Means of Gathering" are absent in the Shōgozō text; for the phrase 「七十八之餘」 tr. "Seventy-eighth, the Remainder", the Song and Yuan read 「七十八下訖第七十九品」 tr. "Seventy-eighth, Last Part, to the Seventy-ninth Chapter", the Ming reads 「七十八之下」 tr. "Seventy-eighth, Last Part", the Palace reads 「七十八品下訖第七十九品」 tr. "Seventy-eighth Chapter, Last Part, to the Seventy-ninth Chapter", and the Shōgozō reads 「七十七品下訖第七十八品」 tr. "Seventy-seventh Chapter, Last Part, to the Seventy-eighth Chapter"; for the character 「卷」 tr. "fascicle" the Palace edition reads 「卷第」 tr. "fascicle number". The three texts of the Song, Yuan, and Palace record that Fascicle 89 in fact spans the boundary between this chapter and the next (「訖第七十九品」 tr. "to the Seventy-ninth Chapter"), the same as the base text—Fascicle 89 does not close its fascicle within this chapter, and goes on to take in the next chapter.

The correspondence with the sūtra explained, the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra (Fascicle Twenty-four · the note on the chapter title · the Sanskrit heading not adopted). The "Four Means of Gathering", the Seventy-eighth chapter, of the sūtra explained, T223, begins at〔T08 0392b12〕, and above it at〔T08 0392b09〕 is the fascicle title 「摩訶般若波羅蜜經卷第二十四」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, Fascicle Twenty-four"—the sūtra text explained in this chapter lies, within the sūtra explained itself, in its Fascicle 24; this fact agrees with Junzheng's citation below (see Section VI). The note on the chapter title of the sūtra explained records that the five texts of the Song, Yuan, Ming, Palace, and Shōgozō entitle it 「摩訶般若波羅蜜經四攝品第七十八」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, Chapter on the Four Means of Gathering, the Seventy-eighth" (adding the sūtra name as a prefix), and at the end of the same note there is attached in addition one line of a Sanskrit heading added by the Taishō editors—this belongs to what modern editors attached, not to what the ancient masters transmitted; this edition records its existence but does not adopt it as a basis for the Sanskrit source, nor transcribe it.

The repetition of a table-of-contents attribute on the side of the sūtra explained (an anomaly in the marking layer · recorded as it is). In the chapter-level table of contents of the sūtra explained, T223, this chapter's displayed text reads 「78 四攝品」 tr. "78 The Four Means of Gathering"〔T08 0392b12〕 while its encoded attribute is marked 「78」 tr. "78", and the displayed text of the preceding chapter, 「77 六喻品」 tr. "77 The Six Similes"〔T08 0389c29〕, has its attribute also marked 「78」 tr. "78"—the two chapters repeat. This section further checks entry by entry above and below: the attributes of Chapters 75 and 76 are likewise both marked 「76」 tr. "76", making two places of repetition in all; the next chapter, 「79 善達品」 tr. "79 Thorough Penetration"〔T08 0398a07〕, has its attribute marked 「79」 tr. "79", and the order returns to correct. The sequence of displayed chapter numbers is itself continuous and without error; the repetition lies only in the layer of encoded attributes; this belongs to a flaw in the marking layer of the electronic edition of the base text, not a doctrinal divergence, recorded as it is without forcing an explanation; the correspondence takes throughout as its standard the character-by-character comparison of displayed text and content.

The two canons divide the fascicle at different points (a division of the fascicle midway on the side of the sūtra explained). On the side of the sūtra explained, at〔T08 0395a18〕 (before 「云何為四無所畏」 tr. "What are the four fearlessnesses?") there is a note: the four texts of the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace begin anew here with 「摩訶般若波羅蜜經卷第二十七,四攝品第七十八之餘」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra, Fascicle Twenty-seven, Chapter on the Four Means of Gathering, the Seventy-eighth, the Remainder", and record 「分卷」 tr. "division of the fascicle". That is, the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace line of the sūtra explained also divides the fascicle midway through this chapter, but its point of division (before the four fearlessnesses) differs from this treatise's boundary between Fascicles 88 and 89 (before the eighty minor marks). The two canons divide their fascicles each in its own way, each going its own course, and neither harms the chapter's being one chapter; recorded as it is.

A full side-by-side reading of the sūtra citations (collation of the two sides · the opening checked sentence by sentence · three control strings). The opening of this treatise's Sūtra ① is almost identical character by character with the "Four Means of Gathering" chapter of the sūtra explained—this treatise reads 「須菩提白佛言:「世尊!若諸法如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如幻、如化,無有實事、無所有性、自相空者」 tr. "Subhūti said to the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! If dharmas are like a dream, like an echo, like a shadow, like a mirage, like an illusion, like a conjuration, without real substance, without any existent nature, and empty of specific marks"〔T25 0677c27〕; the same passage of the sūtra explained begins at〔T08 0392b13〕, the sentence pattern entirely the same, the differences lying only in the dividing and joining of punctuation and in one addition: this treatise reads 「是法能得須陀洹果,能得斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果」 tr. "this dharma can obtain the fruit of the srota-āpanna, can obtain the fruit of the sakṛdāgāmin, the fruit of the anāgāmin, and the fruit of the arhat", while the sūtra explained reads 「是法能得須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果」 tr. "this dharma can obtain the fruit of the srota-āpanna, the fruit of the sakṛdāgāmin, the fruit of the anāgāmin, and the fruit of the arhat"—this treatise repeats the two characters 「能得」 tr. "can obtain", the sūtra explained does not repeat them; this belongs to added characters at the layer of the sūtra citation, recorded as it is. Control group: the three strings of Chinese characters 「八十隨形好,佛身成就」 tr. "the eighty minor marks the Buddha's body accomplishes", 「以二施攝取眾生,所謂財施、法施」 tr. "gathers in beings by the two gifts, namely the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma", and 「實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果」 tr. "really do not know worldly truth, do not know the truth of the highest meaning, do not know the path, and do not know how to distinguish the fruits of the path" are each seen only once in the whole of this treatise and in the whole of the sūtra explained (in this treatise at〔T25 0684c24〕〔T25 0685a01〕〔T25 0686a15〕 respectively, in the sūtra explained at〔T08 0396b10〕〔T08 0396b11〕〔T08 0397b28〕 respectively); the correspondence is unique, with no other chapter to confuse it. This treatise's two 【論】 layers are a structural expansion of the body of the treatise; the sūtra explained has no such layer, and this is not a variant reading. The entry-by-entry count of collation witnesses on the side of the sūtra explained within the range of this chapter's side-by-side reading has not been expanded in this section; that it has not been expanded is recorded as it is, and estimates are not made to pass for counts.

V. The Prajñā Eye

The eye of this chapter lies in gathering into one sequence two things that seem to hinder each other, 「空」 tr. "emptiness" and 「有分別」 tr. "having distinctions". Its meaning can be summarised in five layers.

First, the reason there are still good and evil within emptiness lies in inversion and not in dharmas. The question at the head of the chapter is the question of the whole chapter: within ultimate emptiness, how are wholesome and unwholesome, with outflows and without outflows, and so on up to the fruits of the three vehicles, distinguished? The Buddha's answer does not argue its principle but points to its fact—「凡夫愚人得夢、得見夢者,乃至得化、得見化者,起身口意善業、不善業、無記業」 tr. "Ordinary foolish people find the dream and find the one who sees the dream, and so on up to finding the conjuration and finding the one who sees the conjuration, and give rise to wholesome deeds, unwholesome deeds, and indeterminate deeds of body, speech, and mind"〔T25 0678a04〕. The dream is empty, yet the deeds done in the dream are there; emptiness does not hinder their arising, exactly because they arise from inversion. So Treatise ① explains it: 「凡夫顛倒心故,於法皆作顛倒異見,乃至不見一法是實」 tr. "Because of the inverted mind of ordinary people, they form inverted and different views about all dharmas, so that they do not see even one dharma as real"〔T25 0681b12〕.

Second, the bodhisattva's work lies in 「拔出」 tr. "pulling out" and not in 「說破」 tr. "exposing in one word". Sūtra ① says that the bodhisattva, abiding in the two emptinesses, tells beings that all dharmas are like a dream and like a conjuration, and at once by the power of skilful means pulls them out step by step: from stinginess he pulls them out and makes them practise giving, from the reward of giving he pulls them out and makes them keep morality, and so on until from meditative concentration he pulls them out and makes them abide in the path to nirvāṇa. Treatise ① points out the mechanism here—giving, keeping morality, and meditative concentration all 「因顛倒而生」 tr. "arise because of inversion", 「雖少時益眾生,久則變異,能生苦惱故,亦教令捨離」 tr. "though for a short time they benefit beings, in the long run they change and can give rise to suffering and vexation, so he also teaches them to give these up". First give them a good they can hold on to, then take away what they hold—this is the backbone of the meaning of skilful means in this chapter; if giving and keeping morality were fixed and real dharmas, one should not make people part from them.

Third, the criterion of equal giving is 「一切法不異」 tr. "all dharmas are not different". Sūtra ① sets up the utmost rule of giving: making offerings to a Buddha and giving to birds and beasts 「無有異」 tr. "are without difference", without picking and choosing between fields of merit and what is not a field of merit; its reason is only one sentence—「一切法不異、不分別故」 tr. "because all dharmas are not different and without discrimination"〔T25 0678c08〕; its fruit too is only one sentence—「是菩薩無異、無別布施已,當得無分別法報,所謂一切種智」 tr. "This bodhisattva, having given without difference and without distinction, will obtain the retribution of the dharma without discrimination, namely the omniscience of all kinds"〔T25 0678c09〕. On the ground of the cause there is no discrimination; on the ground of the fruit the knowledge without discrimination is obtained; cause and fruit are one and the same mark. And the fault of picking and choosing is spoken of with the utmost weight: 「若分別簡擇,便墮諸佛、菩薩、辟支佛、學無學人、一切世間天及人訶責處」 tr. "if he discriminates and picks and chooses, he falls into the place of rebuke by the buddhas, bodhisattvas, pratyekabuddhas, those in training and beyond training, and all the gods and humans of the world"〔T25 0678c20〕, and the words of that rebuke are 「誰請汝救一切眾生?汝為一切眾生舍、一切眾生護、一切眾生依」 tr. "Who asked you to rescue all beings? You are the house of all beings, the protection of all beings, the refuge of all beings"〔T25 0678c21〕—having promised oneself as the refuge of all beings, there is no room left for picking and choosing. As for giving up the body, the principle presses one layer further: 「是菩薩摩訶薩為眾生故受身,眾生來取,何可不與」 tr. "This bodhisattva-mahāsattva receives his body for the sake of beings; when beings come to take it, how can he not give?"〔T25 0678c26〕; and that his practice can be without injury lies in the contemplation 「是中誰與、誰受?所施何物」 tr. "Who here gives, who receives? What thing is given?"〔T25 0679a02〕—「住是諸空布施,是時具足檀波羅蜜」 tr. "abiding in these emptinesses he gives, and at that time he makes dānapāramitā complete"〔T25 0679a05〕.

Fourth, the detail and brevity of the four means of gathering have their own reason. Treatise ① itself sets two questions to gather this in: why, among the four things, is giving alone spoken of broadly? The answer: 「布施中攝三事故,以財施、法施教化眾生,則無所不攝」 tr. "because giving contains the three things; teaching and transforming beings by the gift of wealth and the gift of Dharma, there is nothing it does not gather"〔T25 0682b29〕, and 「四事中初廣開布施,則知餘三亦如是」 tr. "among the four things, giving is first opened out broadly, and so one knows the other three are likewise"—raising one gives the pattern for three. Why within giving is the gift of Dharma again spoken of broadly? The answer: 「財施少,法施廣故」 tr. "because the gift of wealth is little and the gift of Dharma is broad"〔T25 0682c03〕, the difference lying in four layers: 「財施,有量果報;法施,無量果報」 tr. "the gift of wealth has a measured retribution; the gift of Dharma has an immeasurable retribution"〔T25 0682c04〕; the gift of wealth is bound to the desire realm, while the gift of Dharma extends through the three realms and even beyond the three realms; the gift of wealth gives the riches and pleasures of the three realms, the gift of Dharma gives the constant pleasure of nirvāṇa; and moreover 「財施從法施生,聞法則能施故」 tr. "the gift of wealth arises from the gift of Dharma, for having heard the Dharma one can give". Detail and brevity are not partiality; it is that the measure of the retribution is naturally so.

Fifth, the gathering of the two truths gathers at 「知」 tr. "knowing" and 「不知」 tr. "not knowing", not at whether dharmas exist. The challenge of the last passage of Sūtra ② is very sharp: since form and the rest are not different from the nature of dharmas, why are there still black and white retributions and the differences of the four fruits? The Buddha answers, 「世諦故,分別說有果報,非第一義」 tr. "By reason of worldly truth, retribution is spoken of with distinctions; it is not the highest meaning"〔T25 0686a04〕. The challenger presses again: if so, ordinary people too should have the fruit of the srota-āpanna. The Buddha then gathers it with a question in return—「以凡夫人實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果,云何當有諸果」 tr. "Because ordinary people really do not know worldly truth, do not know the truth of the highest meaning, do not know the path, and do not know how to distinguish the fruits of the path, how should they have the fruits?"〔T25 0686a15〕; 「聖人知世諦、知第一義諦,有道、有修道,以是故聖人差別有諸果」 tr. "The sages know worldly truth, know the truth of the highest meaning, have the path, and have the cultivation of the path; therefore the sages have the various fruits with distinctions"〔T25 0686a17〕. That distinction can be established hangs on the knowing of the one who distinguishes; ordinary people do not know the two truths, so even the fruits within worldly truth are no share of theirs. Yet this knowing too cannot be held as something attained: 「修道不得果,不修道亦不得果,亦不離道得果,亦不住道中得果」 tr. "Cultivating the path he does not obtain the fruit; not cultivating the path he does not obtain the fruit either; nor does he obtain the fruit apart from the path; nor does he obtain the fruit abiding within the path"〔T25 0686a19〕—all four phrases are dispelled. At the end the whole chapter is gathered in the posture of the one who teaches the Dharma: 「是菩薩自得無所著法,亦教人令得無所著法」 tr. "this bodhisattva himself obtains the dharma without clinging, and also teaches others and makes them obtain the dharma without clinging"〔T25 0686b09〕; 「善通達者,不取法性相,亦不住法性中」 tr. "One who thoroughly penetrates does not grasp at the mark of the nature of dharmas and does not abide within the nature of dharmas"〔T25 0687c15〕—one who penetrates the nature of dharmas does not abide in the nature of dharmas, just as fire does not abide within fire; able to speak yet not clinging to what is spoken: this is the final meaning of this chapter.

VI. Divergent Readings of the Masters

The Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa has no tradition of a complete line-by-line commentary, and the citations and explanations of the ancient masters are, as they actually stand, generally uneven. The situation of the ancient masters' readings of this chapter falls into three: Jizang's commentary on the sūtra explained preserves a complete dedicated chapter; Huiying's commentary on this treatise lacks a line-by-line explanation of this chapter, though elsewhere in the whole book it mentions this chapter twice; Junzheng's book has one summarising citation. The search back through the Tiantai lines and the Commentary on the Vimalakīrti Sūtra closes as a negative result (see below). This section records how what they comment on and cite corresponds to this chapter, without judging the relative merit of each master's interpretation.

Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451) · a hit in a dedicated chapter. His commentary on this chapter begins at〔X24n0451 0330b14〕 (its chapter name is listed separately in the table of contents at〔X24n0451 0195c13〕) and ends at〔X24n0451 0332a12〕, covering the whole of this chapter of the sūtra explained. Six things in it can be recorded.

First, the general judgement of the chapter's place—「此下第二明外化方便。前是內行方便,亦前是自行今是化他,由內行滿足故能外益生」 tr. "From here on, the second makes clear the skilful means of outward transformation. The preceding was the skilful means of inner practice; again, the preceding was one's own practice, and now it is the transforming of others; because inner practice is fulfilled, one can benefit beings outwardly"〔X24n0451 0330b15〕: Jizang takes this chapter as the head of the great section of 「化他」 tr. "transforming others" in the whole sūtra. The order of his division is 「第一此品明菩薩為化道無方巧化非一,第二善達品明為化之能,第三實際品明為化之意」 tr. "First, this chapter makes clear that the bodhisattva, in the path of transforming, has no fixed method, and his skilful transformations are not one; second, the 'Thorough Penetration' chapter makes clear the ability to transform; third, the 'Limit of Reality' chapter makes clear the intent of transforming"〔X24n0451 0330b19〕—three chapters as one group, with this chapter at the head. The same division is also seen where he explains the "Tree of the Path" chapter: 「第二從四攝品以下,明化他行」 tr. "Second, from the 'Four Means of Gathering' chapter on, the practice of transforming others is made clear"〔X24n0451 0324b16〕; before and after, they answer to each other.

Second, the twofold division within the chapter—「初品為二:第一明菩薩化攝無邊為益無量,第二明菩薩雖能廣利不存化功」 tr. "The first chapter is in two: first, it makes clear that the bodhisattva transforms and gathers without bound, giving immeasurable benefit; second, it makes clear that though the bodhisattva can benefit broadly, he does not keep the merit of transforming"〔X24n0451 0330b21〕; the first part is again in two: 「第一明生身方便益物,第二明法身菩提化物遍滿十方也」 tr. "first, it makes clear the fleshly body's skilful means of benefiting beings; second, it makes clear the Dharma body's awakening transforming beings throughout the ten directions"〔X24n0451 0330b23〕.

Third, the three meanings of the repeated question—「昔論有三義生起」 tr. "Of old the treatise had three meanings for raising it"〔X24n0451 0330c01〕; his three meanings (that the sickness of beginningless having something to be attained is hard to break, that as the sūtra is about to close, emptiness is the key to entering the path, and that beings five hundred years after the Buddha's passing are of dull faculties and hard to awaken) correspond in order to the three causes and conditions brought out in Treatise ① (see Section VII). Jizang also ties the question to the chapters before and after on his own: 「上品末問與今問同。上品末答明無所有破病,今品答明法雖無所有於凡夫有也」 tr. "The question at the end of the preceding chapter is the same as the present question. The answer at the end of the preceding chapter makes clear that being without anything existent breaks the sickness; the answer of the present chapter makes clear that although dharmas are without anything existent, for ordinary people they exist"〔X24n0451 0330c06〕.

Fourth, the gain and loss of picking and choosing—「外施中為二:初、正明平等施為得;次、明簡擇施為失」 tr. "Within outer giving there are two: first, it makes clear directly that equal giving is gain; next, it makes clear that giving with picking and choosing is loss"〔X24n0451 0330c23〕, below which another layer is opened: 「須知簡擇不簡擇但得失安,無明無知心中簡擇不簡擇但失」 tr. "One must know that picking and choosing and not picking and choosing are only gain or loss as they are placed; within a mind of ignorance and not-knowing, picking and choosing and not picking and choosing are only loss"〔X24n0451 0330c24〕—for one with skilful means, picking and choosing and not picking and choosing are both gain; for one without skilful means, both are loss.

Fifth, the two questions on the marks and minor signs—「問:三十二相云何是出世間法?答:此是無漏果無漏業日起」 tr. "Question: How are the thirty-two marks world-transcending dharmas? Answer: These arise daily as the fruit without outflows of deeds without outflows"〔X24n0451 0331a21〕; 「問:上來何故不明相好,至此始明耶?答:生、法二身。上來明法身,法身最勝故;次明生身,生身劣故也」 tr. "Question: Why were the marks and minor signs not made clear above, and only made clear here? Answer: There are the two bodies, the fleshly and the Dharma. Above, the Dharma body was made clear, because the Dharma body is supreme; next the fleshly body is made clear, because the fleshly body is inferior"〔X24n0451 0331a22〕. The two questions agree entirely with the two questions set in Treatise ①. His explanation of the question on the knowledge of all kinds reads 「當得種智名菩薩,已得種智名佛也」 tr. "One who is to obtain the knowledge of all kinds is named bodhisattva; one who has obtained the knowledge of all kinds is named Buddha"〔X24n0451 0331a18〕, on the same track as Treatise ①'s answer. Again, 「問:何故廣釋布施?若布施在初既廣,後亦例廣,後略明亦略也」 tr. "Question: Why is giving explained broadly? If giving, at the beginning, is already broad, the later ones are broad by its example; when the later ones are made clear briefly, they too are brief"〔X24n0451 0331b13〕, which also corresponds to Treatise ①'s answer that raising one gives the pattern for three.

Sixth, the challenge on the two truths—here Jizang states his own difference from 「由來諸大師」 tr. "the great masters of earlier times": the masters take Subhūti as challenging in terms of worldly truth, while Jizang judges that he challenges in terms of the highest meaning, returning at the end to 「佛答:凡夫不知二諦,不語二諦也」 tr. "The Buddha answers: ordinary people do not know the two truths; he is not speaking of the two truths"〔X24n0451 0331c24〕, and explaining why the first fruit is named: 「須陀洹是聖始,故標初為言也」 tr. "The srota-āpanna is the beginning of the sages, so the first is named in speaking"〔X24n0451 0331c24〕. Again, his explanation of the forty-two gates of letters says 「四十二字入一字,論四十二字皆有阿分,故入阿中也」 tr. "The forty-two letters enter one letter: the treatise says the forty-two letters all have a share of a, so they enter into a"〔X24n0451 0331b21〕—he says 「論」 tr. "the treatise" explicitly, that is, he cites the text of this treatise's Treatise ② to explain the sūtra explained; the trace of this inheritance can be checked character by character.

Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791) · the line-by-line explanation of this chapter lacking · mentioned twice in the whole book (recorded as it is). The only ancient commentary that explains this treatise, it survives only in fragmentary fascicles; the extant text stops at〔X46n0791 0917b12〕 (in the middle of Chapter 69), so the line-by-line explanation of this chapter is lacking, and is not recorded as zero hits. Yet elsewhere in the whole of his book there are two mentions of this chapter, which this section checks character by character. The first is a sectional division: 「第二從四攝品去於化品有十品經,明菩薩外化方便」 tr. "Second, from the 'Four Means of Gathering' chapter onward to the 'Transformation' chapter there are ten chapters of the sūtra, which make clear the bodhisattva's skilful means of outward transformation"〔X46n0791 0912c21〕—Huiying, like Jizang, takes this chapter as the head of the section on 「外化方便」 tr. "the skilful means of outward transformation"; the two masters, in different books, run on the same track, and Huiying himself ties what he relies on to the old division of 「苻姚時諸法師」 tr. "the Dharma masters of the Fu and Yao times". The second is a question on names and marks: 「問:依下句義品及四攝品,經云皆是出世間法,何故唯言為別無色定」 tr. "Question: According to the 'Meaning of the Phrase' chapter below and the 'Four Means of Gathering' chapter, the sūtra says that all are world-transcending dharmas; why does it speak only of distinguishing the formless absorptions?"〔X46n0791 0815a14〕—what he calls to witness is precisely this chapter's list of items, 「出世間不共凡夫法」 tr. "world-transcending dharmas not shared with ordinary people" (see Section II), which shows that although Huiying did not reach the point of commenting on this chapter, when he read this treatise he already took the text of this chapter as a basis.

Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784) · one summarising citation. 「故大品經二十四卷四攝品云:佛告須菩提:凡夫實不知世諦,不知第一義,不知中道,不知分別道果,云何當有諸道不等也」 tr. "Therefore the 'Four Means of Gathering' chapter in Fascicle Twenty-four of the Larger Sūtra says: The Buddha told Subhūti: ordinary people really do not know worldly truth, do not know the highest meaning, do not know the middle path, and do not know how to distinguish the fruits of the path; how should they have the inequalities of the paths?"〔X46n0784 0624a14〕. The fascicle number he attaches agrees with the sūtra explained itself (this chapter of the sūtra explained lies in its Fascicle 24, see Section IV), which shows that what Junzheng cites is the sūtra explained and not this treatise. Comparing the citation character by character with the base text: the sūtra explained reads 「以凡夫人實不知世諦,不知第一義諦,不知道,不知分別道果,云何當有諸果」 tr. "Because ordinary people really do not know worldly truth, do not know the truth of the highest meaning, do not know the path, and do not know how to distinguish the fruits of the path, how should they have the fruits?"〔T08 0397b27〕, and the same passage of this treatise reads 「以凡夫人實不知世諦、不知第一義諦、不知道、不知分別道果,云何當有諸果」 tr. "Because ordinary people really do not know worldly truth, do not know the truth of the highest meaning, do not know the path, and do not know how to distinguish the fruits of the path, how should they have the fruits?"〔T25 0686a15〕—what Junzheng cites is a summarising rewrite: it omits the character 「人」 tr. "people", changes 「第一義諦」 tr. "the truth of the highest meaning" to 「第一義」 tr. "the highest meaning", changes 「諸果」 tr. "the fruits" to 「諸道不等」 tr. "the inequalities of the paths", and at the place of 「不知道」 tr. "do not know the path" inserts the phrase 「不知中道」 tr. "do not know the middle path". This section, searching back character by character in both this treatise and the sūtra explained, finds the two Chinese characters 「中道」 tr. "middle path" nowhere before or after this passage—this phrase is a word of Junzheng's own interpretation (his preceding text is precisely discussing the middle path and the Buddha-nature), not a miscitation of the base text; recorded as it is without judgement.

The Tiantai lines and the Commentary on the Vimalakīrti Sūtra · closed as a negative result (a dedicated check, recording the facts). Zhiyi's Great Calming and Contemplation (T46n1911), Zhanran's Supporting Practice and Broad Resolution of Calming and Contemplation (T46n1912), Zhiyi's Profound Meaning of the Lotus (T33n1716), Zhanran's Annotations on the Profound Meaning of the Lotus (T33n1717), Zhiyi's Words and Phrases of the Lotus (T34n1718), and Sengzhao and others' Commentary on the Vimalakīrti Sūtra (T38n1775)—these six works were searched back character by character for 「四攝品」 tr. "the 'Four Means of Gathering' chapter": all have zero hits. No named citation of this chapter by these six works is seen; zero hits is also an entry of the ledger, and is not filled in with examples of citation from other chapters.

VII. Cross-reading and Further Resonances

The threads of meaning of this chapter that carry on from before and after are five; all are recorded in this section, without fixing a reading in their place.

First, the continuation of the repeated question (Chapter 77 → 78 · the treatise-author himself answers why). At the opening of Treatise ① the treatise-author asks himself: 「上來已,處處說:「諸法性空,云何分別有善、不善?」」 tr. "Above, it has already been said in place after place: ‘All dharmas are empty of nature; how are wholesome and unwholesome distinguished?’"〔T25 0681b01〕—why, when the meaning of chapter after chapter is not different, are questions asked under all kinds of names? His answer first sets up one sentence, 「是事上已答」 tr. "This matter has already been answered above"〔T25 0681b03〕, and next brings out three causes and conditions: 「眾生從無始生死已來著心深難解故,須菩提復作是重問」 tr. "Because the clinging mind of beings, from beginningless birth and death onward, is deep and hard to undo, Subhūti again asks this repeated question"〔T25 0681b04〕; 「是般若波羅蜜欲說是空,義要故,數問」 tr. "This prajñāpāramitā wishes to speak of this emptiness; because the meaning is essential, it is asked again and again"〔T25 0681b05〕; and because 「佛滅度五百年後,像法中眾生愛著佛法,墮著法中」 tr. "five hundred years after the Buddha's passing into extinction, beings in the semblance Dharma love and cling to the Buddha's Dharma and fall into clinging to dharmas"〔T25 0681b07〕, out of compassion he makes it clear again. The treatise-author himself acknowledges that this chapter's question and the preceding chapter's question are one and the same question; their difference lies only in the answer—the preceding chapter answers that being without anything existent breaks the sickness, this chapter answers that 「法雖無所有於凡夫有」 tr. "although dharmas are without anything existent, for ordinary people they exist" (Jizang's words, see Section VI). The collation layer too keeps a trace of the joining of the two chapters: among the eighteen star re-citation entries of this chapter, the shared note of two falls within the range of Chapter 77 (see Section VIII); the same variant reading shares a note across chapters, and the encoding layer of the base text itself proves that the two chapters join.

Second, back-references within the chapter and beyond the chapter (recorded by the treatise-author himself). Treatise ① twice points back to earlier text: explaining the difference of the marks and minor signs it says 「如先分別轉輪聖王、佛相不同中說」 tr. "as was said earlier where it distinguished that the marks of the wheel-turning sage king and of the Buddha are not the same"〔T25 0683a03〕; before explaining the ten powers it says 「四念處等諸法義,如先說」 tr. "the meaning of the four foundations of mindfulness and the other dharmas is as said earlier"〔T25 0683a20〕. Treatise ② points to the general outline of this treatise: 「四十二字義,如摩訶衍中說」 tr. "the meaning of the forty-two letters is as said within the Mahāyāna"〔T25 0686c01〕. All three places are the warp and weft the treatise-author himself makes, not added by later people.

Third, three other sūtras cited (the Vimalakīrti Sūtra, the Lotus Sūtra, the Sūtra of the Secret Traces). Within one chapter Treatise ① cites three sūtras as proof: the simile of the fragrant rice cites the Vimalakīrti Sūtra〔T25 0682b05〕, making the body a lamp cites the Lotus Sūtra〔T25 0682b10〕, showing colours according to what is liked cites the Sūtra of the Secret Traces〔T25 0684a22〕. All three citations serve as proof to help the explanation and do not touch the classification of teachings; recorded as it is.

Fourth, the same track in the ancient masters' sectional divisions (Jizang · Huiying · the old division of the Fu and Yao times). As for this chapter's place in the whole sūtra, Jizang judges it the head of 「外化方便」 tr. "the skilful means of outward transformation"〔X24n0451 0330b15〕, and Huiying, citing the division of the Dharma masters of the Fu and Yao times, likewise reads 「第二從四攝品去於化品有十品經,明菩薩外化方便」 tr. "Second, from the 'Four Means of Gathering' chapter onward to the 'Transformation' chapter there are ten chapters of the sūtra, which make clear the bodhisattva's skilful means of outward transformation"〔X46n0791 0912c21〕—the two masters, in different books and different times, alike tie this chapter as the hinge where inner practice turns to outward transformation, and Huiying states explicitly that what he inherits is the old division of the masters contemporary with Kumārajīva's translation bureau. This is one of the firmest proofs at the level of this chapter's sectional division; both sides stand together, recorded without judgement.

Fifth, linking to the treasury (stable citation · soft citation). This chapter's bodhisattva gate of practice, ‘gathering beings by the four means of gathering’, its sequence of giving and teaching, ‘the gift of wealth always followed by teaching, ending in nirvāṇa’, its meaning of equal giving, ‘one and the same giving because all dharmas are not different’, its judgement of the two gifts, ‘the gift of wealth is measured, the gift of Dharma immeasurable’, its meaning of the forty-two gates of letters, ‘letters are the gate, being without letters is the meaning’, its meaning of the two truths, ‘ordinary people have none of the fruits because they do not know the two truths’, and its posture of the one who teaches the Dharma, ‘not grasping at the mark of the nature of dharmas and not abiding within the nature of dharmas’—these are what the treatise basket on the gate of practice of prajñā and the meaning of the two truths rests on; they rest on a stable citation〔T25n1509 四攝品·卷八十八至八十九〕; since the places in the volumes of the Heart Sūtra, the Diamond Sūtra, and Consciousness-Only that cite this treatise are not yet in final form, the citation is soft, awaiting their character-by-character verification. This belongs to the further resonances of the meaning of prajñā running down through the sūtras; recorded without judgement.

VIII. Witnesses and Editions

The base text of this chapter is Fascicles 88 to 89 of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa〔T25 0677c26–0687c18〕 (the main text of the chapter body begins from the chapter title〔T25 0677c26〕; the two units of the First Part and the Middle Part lie in Fascicle 88, and the one unit of the Last Part begins from the continuing title of Fascicle 89〔T25 0684b08〕, ending at〔T25 0687c17〕; the next chapter begins at〔T25 0687c18〕); the collation text for the sūtra explained is the "Four Means of Gathering", the Seventy-eighth chapter, of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra〔T08 0392b12 起,訖 0398a07 前〕; the ancient-master commentary text for collation is Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451, covering this chapter at〔X24n0451 0330b14–0332a12〕); Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791) lacks a line-by-line explanation of this chapter and has in addition two mentions outside the chapter; Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784) has one summarising citation; the Tiantai lines and the Commentary on the Vimalakīrti Sūtra are closed as a negative result (see also Section VI). The variant collation notes follow the Taishō collation, covering differences between the Taishō base text and the Song, Yuan, Ming, Palace, Shōgozō, and Ishiyama (the Ishiyama-dera manuscript) texts, as well as the Korean Canon (K) and the CBETA collation.

The layer of witnesses (the three texts of the Song, Ming, and Yuan the main body · the Shōgozō B with zero witnesses in the whole chapter). The distribution of witnesses in this chapter's two hundred and twenty collation notes, recounted entry by entry in this section: the Song seen one hundred and seventeen times, the Ming one hundred and fourteen times, the Yuan one hundred and nine times, the Shōgozō seventy-eight times, the Palace seventy-six times, the Ishiyama fifty-six times; the CBETA collation four times, the Korean Canon collation four times. Among them the entries of missing characters (the variant text lacks the character) number one hundred and six, nearly half of the whole ledger. The Shōgozō B text has zero witnesses in this chapter—entirely unlike the situation in Chapters 45 to 47, where the Shōgozō B appears densely; the Korean B, the Southern Canon, and the Northern Canon likewise all appear zero times. For the texts that appear little, their zero is recorded as it is, and is not supplied by inference from the density of other chapters.

The notes on the two 【經】 markers do not enter the entries (the asymmetry of the structural markers). Both 【論】 markers form collation entries (〔T25 0681b01〕, 〔T25 0686b21〕), but the two 【經】 markers do not: at the place of Sūtra ①〔T25 0677c27〕 the base text has no note; at the place of Sūtra ②〔T25 0684b13〕 there is one note (recording that the three texts of the Song, Palace, and Shōgozō lack this marker, and recording that the Ishiyama text does not divide the fascicle), which does not form an entry. In addition, before the fascicle-end title of Fascicle 88, at〔T25 0684b04〕, there is one note of the Ishiyama text, 「不分卷」 tr. "no division of the fascicle", which likewise does not enter the entries. These three notes belong to the note layer; this section lists them separately to supply them, so that no variant reading of the structural markers is left out.

Four entries of the type emended by CBETA following the Korean Canon (the correct reading being the CBETA emendation · listed separately). Of the special type belonging to the modern collation layer of CBETA, emended following the Korean Canon (K14n0549), this chapter has four entries in all; checked character by character against the base text, they are listed separately: the first〔T25 0678c11〕 「匃(K14n0549_p1383c04)【CB】【麗-CB】|匈【大】」 tr. "gai ‘beg’ (K14n0549_p1383c04) (CB) | xiong ‘chest’ (Taishō)"; the second〔T25 0684a25〕 「髆(K14n0549_p1391c11)【CB】|[骨*(十/田/寸)](K14n0549_p1391c11)【麗-CB】|𮪴【大】|膊【宋】【元】【明】【宮】」 tr. "bo ‘shoulder-blade’ (K14n0549_p1391c11) (CB) | a composed character (K14n0549_p1391c11) (Korean-CB) | a variant form (Taishō) | bo ‘shoulder’ (Song) (Yuan) (Ming) (Palace)"—in this entry the CBETA reading is a single-character form and the Korean Canon reading a composed-character formula, the two forms appearing together, and this edition transmits them as they stand in the general ledger; the third〔T25 0684c11〕 「臍(K14n0549_p1392b15)(T08n0223_p0396a26)【CB】【麗-CB】|齎【大】|臍【宮】」 tr. "qi ‘navel’ (K14n0549_p1392b15) (T08n0223_p0396a26) (CB) (Korean-CB) | ji ‘bring’ (Taishō) | qi ‘navel’ (Palace)"—this entry is at the same time tied by a cross-reference to the corresponding place in the sūtra explained, the only entry in this chapter carrying a second layer of cross-reference; the fourth〔T25 0687b23〕 「者(K14n0549_p1396b18)【CB】【麗-CB】|道【大】」 tr. "zhe ‘one who’ (K14n0549_p1396b18) (CB) (Korean-CB) | dao ‘path’ (Taishō)". In three of the four entries the strings of cross-reference are, in the base text, in a joined form directly following one another without separation; the working base text, for readability, separates them with full-width parentheses, adding or removing nothing in the wording. This edition's reader-facing text follows the reading of the current CBETA text.

Eighteen star entries (sixteen within the chapter · two across chapters · a separate listing recording their type). The star re-citation entries of this chapter (the same variant reading recurring in the text and sharing one note) number eighteen in all, marked with each entry in the table below. Checking entry by entry the note each shares: for sixteen entries the shared note falls within the range of this chapter (〔T25 0678b05〕 contain / house, 〔T25 0678b26〕 take / missing, 〔T25 0680a16〕 follow / cultivate and contemplate / missing, 〔T25 0680b08〕 turning away and relinquishing / liberation, four occurrences sharing one note, 〔T25 0680b16〕 know / missing, 〔T25 0683a07〕 mark / missing, 〔T25 0684a06〕 guide / path, 〔T25 0685b17〕 empty / missing, 〔T25 0685c25〕 limit / limit not different, 〔T25 0686a26〕 fruit / missing), while for two entries the shared note falls within the range of Chapter 77—the note on the character 「相」 tr. "mark" at〔T25 0678c02〕 (the shared note at〔T25 0677a17〕), and the note on the 「【論】」 tr. "(treatise)" marker at〔T25 0681b01〕 (the shared note at〔T25 0677b16〕, that is, the note on Chapter 77's 【論】 marker). The latter entry is especially worth recording: the note on the preceding chapter's 【論】 marker is precisely the place of definition of this star, while the one that shares it falls outside the preceding chapter, that is, in this chapter; the structural markers of the two chapters share one note, which forms the inside and outside of each other with the trace of the two chapters' joining recorded in Section VII. The main body of the star entries is the item-by-item recurrence of single characters such as 「背捨/解脫」 tr. "turning away and relinquishing / liberation" (the Song and the Shōgozō consistently read liberation, four occurrences in a continuous passage), 「循/修」 tr. "follow / cultivate" (the Ishiyama text reads cultivate), and 「含/舍」 tr. "contain / house" (the Ming edition reads house), none of which touches doctrine.

The general collation ledger (a full reckoning of two hundred and twenty entries · the base text as it stands). Below, following the working base text as it stands, they are transmitted—the collation notes of this chapter total two hundred and twenty entries, mechanically agreeing with the tool value of the working base text, and this section, recounting entry by entry from the base text, also obtains two hundred and twenty; the two numbers agree independently. The entries are listed in full in the order of their appearance in the base text, including eighteen star re-citation entries (each marked with the note it shares and where that note lies) and four entries emended by CBETA following the Korean Canon (each marked). The note on the chapter title, the notes on the fascicle titles, and the notes on the two 【經】 markers belong to the note layer and are not within the entries; they have been listed separately in Section IV and in this section. The distribution of entries among the three units: the First Part eighty-eight entries, the Middle Part fifty-seven entries, the Last Part seventy-five entries. The readings of the variant texts are preserved side by side, while the main text still follows the reading of the current base text:

Collation entries (two hundred and twenty · in order of appearance in the base text · stars marked with each entry)

  • 〔T25 0678a16〕無【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678a17〕有【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678a21〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0678a23〕令【大】|念【聖】
  • 〔T25 0678a25〕無邊【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678a28〕種種因緣【大】|因緣種種【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0678b05〕含【大】|舍【明】
  • 〔T25 0678b06〕果【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678b06〕含【大】|舍【明】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0678b05〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0678b07〕含【大】|舍【明】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0678b05〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0678b08〕亦【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678b26〕取【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0678b26〕禪【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0678b28〕可【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0678b29〕取【大】|〔-〕【石】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0678b26〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0678c02〕相【大】|相三昧【石】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0677a17〕 · across chapters · Chapter 77)
  • 〔T25 0678c02〕所【大】|而【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【石】
  • 〔T25 0678c07〕有【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0678c09〕無【大】|無分【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0678c10〕法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678c11〕匃(K14n0549_p1383c04)【CB】【麗-CB】|匈【大】 (the type emended by CBETA following the Korean Canon · see the separate listing in Section VIII)
  • 〔T25 0678c15〕布施【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678c15〕應【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0678c20〕擇【大】|釋【石】
  • 〔T25 0678c21〕訶責【大】|呵嘖【石】
  • 〔T25 0678c24〕時,若【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0678c25〕支【大】|肢【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679a01〕提【大】|提若【石】
  • 〔T25 0679a08〕如【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679a16〕養【大】|給【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0679a21〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679a21〕皆【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0679b02〕修【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679b18〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679b19〕取【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0679b22〕珂貝【大】|呵珼【石】
  • 〔T25 0679b24〕若【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0679b29〕念戒【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679c03〕相【大】|相三昧【石】
  • 〔T25 0679c08〕蜜【大】|蜜已【石】
  • 〔T25 0679c09〕後【大】|復【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0679c15〕及【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0679c16〕以【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0679c28〕無漏【大】|〔-〕【宋】
  • 〔T25 0680a03〕言:「菩薩與佛有何等異?」 tr. "How do the bodhisattva and the Buddha differ?"【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680a03〕佛言:「有異。菩薩摩訶薩得一切種智,是名為佛。所以者何?【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680a09〕已【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680a16〕循【大】|修【石】
  • 〔T25 0680a16〕觀【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680a16〕循【大】|修【石】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0680a16〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0680a17〕觀【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0680a16〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0680a17〕循【大】|修【石】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0680a16〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0680a18〕觀【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680a19〕所愛【大】|所受【宋】【元】【明】|愛【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680a29〕息【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0680b03〕相【大】|相三昧【石】
  • 〔T25 0680b07〕內【大】|內有【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680b08〕背捨【大】|解脫【宋】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680b08〕背捨【大】|解脫【宋】【聖】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0680b08〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0680b09〕背捨【大】|解脫【宋】【聖】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0680b08〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0680b09〕背捨【大】|解脫【宋】【聖】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0680b08〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0680b09〕一切【大】|有【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680b11〕背捨【大】|解脫【宋】【聖】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0680b08〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0680b13〕法【大】|法相【宋】
  • 〔T25 0680b14〕禪【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680b16〕知【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680b17〕法【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0680b18〕知【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0680b16〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0680b19〕一切【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680b23〕佛【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680b29〕有【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680c19〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680c20〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0680c24〕者【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0680c25〕想【大】|相【宋】【元】
  • 〔T25 0680c26〕已【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0680c26〕減【大】|咸【聖】
  • 〔T25 0681a03〕奩【大】|𭺈【聖】
  • 〔T25 0681a07〕𨄔,𨄔【大】|腨腨【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681a11〕軟【大】|軟而【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681a13〕停【大】|亭【石】
  • 〔T25 0681a13〕蜹【大】|䖟【石】
  • 〔T25 0681a22〕睫【大】|䀹【宋】|𥇒【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681a24〕肉【大】|肉骨【宋】【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0681a25〕世界【大】|國土【石】
  • 〔T25 0681a25〕則【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0681a27〕明【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681a29〕眾【大】|眾生【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681b01〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0677b16〕 · across chapters · Chapter 77)
  • 〔T25 0681b01〕上來已【大】|上已來【宋】【聖】【石】|從上已來【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681b02〕品【大】|〔-〕【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681b13〕中【大】|法【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0681b17〕悲【大】|愁【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0681b26〕貪【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681c09〕次復【大】|復次【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0681c14〕問【大】|門【聖】
  • 〔T25 0682a03〕門【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682a21〕三【大】|是三【石】
  • 〔T25 0682a24〕倍【大】|位【聖】
  • 〔T25 0682a26〕見【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682b05〕說【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682b06〕慈【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0682b12〕恩【大】|思【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0682b19〕緣【大】|緣果報【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682c05〕果【大】|欲界果【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682c08〕能【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0682c13〕得【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0682c23〕有【大】|又【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683a04〕故【大】|果【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683a07〕相【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0683a08〕相【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0683a07〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0683a17〕為【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0683a17〕法身大【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0683a17〕大【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0683a23〕則【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683a27〕非處【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0683b02〕者【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683b02〕力【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683b10〕而【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683b20〕作【大】|行【石】
  • 〔T25 0683b20〕欲【大】|故【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683b22〕責【大】|嘖【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0683b24〕瘡【大】|創【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0683c07〕報【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0683c15〕語言:「汝【大】|證言【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683c17〕去【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0683c22〕利鈍根【大】|根利鈍【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0684a06〕導【大】|道【石】
  • 〔T25 0684a07〕現【大】|現相【宋】【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0684a07〕又【大】|入【明】
  • 〔T25 0684a10〕爪【大】|抓【宋】【宮】|瓜【明】|扴【石】
  • 〔T25 0684a14〕腫【大】|朣【明】
  • 〔T25 0684a16〕眾【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684a16〕好【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0684a17〕常【大】|當【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684a22〕密【大】|蜜【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684a23〕導【大】|道【石】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0684a06〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0684a25〕髆(K14n0549_p1391c11)【CB】|[骨*(十/田/寸)](K14n0549_p1391c11)【麗-CB】|𮪴【大】|膊【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 (the type emended by CBETA following the Korean Canon · see the separate listing in Section VIII)
  • 〔T25 0684a26〕以【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684a26〕髻【大】|結【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684b02〕相【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684b04〕好【大】|好釋第七六品訖第七十七品上【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b05〕大智度論卷第八十八【大】|〔-〕【石】
  • 〔T25 0684b05〕論【大】|經論【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b05〕八【大】|八釋第七十七品訖第七十八品【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684b08〕論【大】|經論【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b08〕四攝品【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b08〕七十八之餘【大】|七十八下訖第七十九品【宋】【元】|七十八之下【明】|七十八品下訖第七十九品【宮】|七十七品下訖第七十八品【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b09〕卷【大】|卷第【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684b13〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b15〕埵【大】|𦖋【元】【明】|㻔【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b16〕鉤鎖【大】|拘𤨏【聖】|拘𭹿【石】
  • 〔T25 0684b21〕持【大】|身【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b22〕逶迤【大】|委陀【石】
  • 〔T25 0684b27〕音【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684b27〕臍【大】|齊【石】
  • 〔T25 0684c02〕姝【大】|姝好【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|殊好【石】
  • 〔T25 0684c03〕淨滿【大】|滿淨【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684c04〕與【大】|興【石】
  • 〔T25 0684c07〕羅【大】|那【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0684c10〕足【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684c11〕臍(K14n0549_p1392b15)(T08n0223_p0396a26)【CB】【麗-CB】|齎【大】|臍【宮】 (the type emended by CBETA following the Korean Canon · see the separate listing in Section VIII)
  • 〔T25 0684c14〕淨潔【大】|潔淨【石】
  • 〔T25 0684c18〕差【大】|著【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684c18〕生【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684c19〕發【大】|變【聖】
  • 〔T25 0684c21〕相【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684c23〕好【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0684c24〕是【大】|是為【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0685a16〕善說字法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685a17〕字法【大】|法【宋】【元】【明】【宮】|字【聖】
  • 〔T25 0685a19〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685a21〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685a28〕眾生不可得【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685b02〕無【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685b10〕空【大】|空眾生不可得故【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0685b10〕空【大】|〔-〕【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0685b17〕空【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685b17〕空【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0685b17〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0685b20〕當知【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0685b28〕何【大】|何分別【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0685c04〕是【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685c13〕所有法不住所有法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0685c19〕佛【大】|佛及【石】
  • 〔T25 0685c25〕際【大】|際不異【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0685c27〕異如、不異實際,受、想、行、識,乃至有【大】|〔-〕【聖】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0685c25〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0685c27〕際【大】|際不異【元】【明】【石】
  • 〔T25 0686a01〕天【大】|諸天【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686a13〕法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686a13〕諦【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686a24〕果【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686a26〕果【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686a26〕果【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】 (star re-citation · the shared note at〔T25 0686a26〕 · within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0686b04〕須菩提【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686b12〕邊虛【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686b14〕他【大】|他人【石】
  • 〔T25 0686b21〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686b24〕乃生【大】|乃至【宮】|乃至生【石】
  • 〔T25 0686b27〕立【大】|平【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686c04〕羅【大】|罪【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686c07〕諸【大】|識【聖】
  • 〔T25 0686c20〕明【大】|眼【宮】
  • 〔T25 0686c24〕有【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】
  • 〔T25 0687a05〕說【大】|施【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687a11〕異【大】|畢【聖】
  • 〔T25 0687a13〕壞【大】|增【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687a13〕性【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687a15〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687a25〕所有【大】|有【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】|有為法【石】
  • 〔T25 0687b08〕夫【大】|夫人【石】
  • 〔T25 0687b23〕者(K14n0549_p1396b18)【CB】【麗-CB】|道【大】 (the type emended by CBETA following the Korean Canon · see the separate listing in Section VIII)
  • 〔T25 0687b28〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687c05〕法【大】|法相【聖】
  • 〔T25 0687c07〕也【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687c16〕中【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687c16〕悶【大】|問【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0687c16〕罣【大】|量【宋】【元】【明】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0687c17〕無礙【大】|礙【聖】|無𮤉【石】
  • 〔T25 0687c17〕無【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0687c17〕性【大】|性釋第七十八品【聖】|性釋第七十七品竟【石】

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing. The full statement of AI's role across the 指月 project is maintained at methodology.

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0