大智度論 四念處品之一Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · The Four Foundations of Mindfulness, Part 1 of 2
四念處品之一:四念處立,身念處十二觀(行住坐臥·安那般那·四大·三十六物·死屍九觀),論釋十二觀之得定與菩薩不共(經+論)
這一品,佛從三十七道品的頭一組——四念處——起手,把整個道品的譜系攤開來,一一標作「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」。先是身念處:行住坐臥了了自知,入出息如旋師之知繩長短,觀身四大如屠者之分牛四分,觀三十六物之不淨如明眼農夫開倉辨穀,乃至見死屍九想、白骨如貝——一路觀身,卻「亦無身覺,以不可得故」。你或要問:既說「念處」,何不逕說「智處」?論主答得乾脆——「初習行時,未及有智;念為初門」,而其實「四念處實體是智慧」;念只是初入的門,智慧才是它的體。四念處慧勝,四正勤精進勝,四如意足定勝,同是一個道品之體,隨增上之法而異名。接著論主點出這一品最要緊的一道分野:聲聞觀四念處,得煖、頂、忍乃至四果,取以證滅便了;菩薩卻「不忘本願,不捨大悲」,雖修這三十七品而不取涅槃——「本願牢故,大悲心深入故」。他借七住地的夢喻說:菩薩如人夢中縛栰渡河、中流而覺,正想「我空自疲苦,無河無栰」而欲自滅倒心時,「十方佛伸手摩頭」,勸他念本願、以此空法去度眾生。同一四念處,聲聞取以自證,菩薩行以度生,分野正在般若所攝的這一點本願大悲。過了經文的第二道門檻,佛便把餘下的道品一口氣列全——四正勤、四如意分、五根五力、七覺八正、三三昧、十一智、三根、十念、諸禪定,乃至佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法——每一目都收在「以不可得故」。到最後,落到四十二字入門:阿字門「一切法初不生故」,一路到「過荼無字可得」,佛說「因字有語,因語有名,因名有義」,聞一字即通一切法之實相;而菩薩分別破散諸字,言語空、名空、義空,「得畢竟空,即是般若波羅蜜」。這,便是四念處品要你領會的:從四念處到四十二字門,種種道品名數,一一以「以不可得故」為印,同歸於般若之無所得,和合而成一個大乘之體——「如是等種種分別,是名『菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍』」。
In this chapter the Buddha begins from the first group of the thirty-seven limbs of the path, the four foundations of mindfulness, spreads open the whole lineage of the limbs of the path, and labels each of them ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna’. First the foundation of mindfulness of the body: in walking, standing, sitting, and lying one knows oneself clearly; in breathing in and out one is like a turner who knows the length of his cord; one contemplates the four great elements of the body as a butcher divides an ox into four parts; one contemplates the impurity of the thirty-six things as a clear-eyed farmer opening the granary and distinguishing the grains; and so on to seeing the nine perceptions of the corpse and the white bones like shells; contemplating the body all the way, and yet 「亦無身覺,以不可得故」 tr. "also without any notion of a body, because it is unfindable". You may ask: since it is called ‘foundation of mindfulness’, why not simply say ‘foundation of wisdom’? The treatise-author answers crisply: 「初習行時,未及有智;念為初門」 tr. "at the beginning of practice one has not yet reached wisdom; mindfulness is the first gate", while in truth 「四念處實體是智慧」 tr. "the real substance of the four foundations of mindfulness is wisdom"; mindfulness is only the gate of first entry, and wisdom is its substance. In the four foundations of mindfulness wisdom prevails, in the four right efforts vigour prevails, in the four bases of supernormal power concentration prevails; all are the one substance of the limbs of the path, differing in name according to which dharma is dominant. Then the treatise-author points out the most important dividing line of this chapter: śrāvakas contemplate the four foundations of mindfulness, attain heat, summit, acceptance, up to the four fruits, take them to realise cessation, and are done; the bodhisattva, however, 「不忘本願,不捨大悲」 tr. "does not forget his original vow and does not abandon great compassion", and though he cultivates these thirty-seven limbs he does not take nirvāṇa, 「本願牢故,大悲心深入故」 tr. "because his original vow is firm, because his mind of great compassion has entered deeply". He borrows the dream simile of the seventh abiding ground: the bodhisattva is like a man who in a dream binds a raft to cross a river and wakes midstream; just as he thinks ‘I have wearied myself for nothing; there is no river and no raft’ and is about to extinguish his inverted mind, 「十方佛伸手摩頭」 tr. "the Buddhas of the ten directions stretch out their hands and stroke his head", urging him to recollect his original vow and to deliver beings with this dharma of emptiness. The same four foundations of mindfulness: the śrāvaka takes them to realise for himself, the bodhisattva practises them to deliver beings, and the dividing line lies precisely in this original vow and great compassion that prajñā gathers in. Past the second threshold of the sūtra text, the Buddha lists all the remaining limbs of the path in one breath: the four right efforts, the four divisions of the bases of supernormal power, the five faculties and five powers, the seven limbs of awakening and the eightfold path, the three samādhi, the eleven knowledges, the three faculties, the ten recollections, the meditations and absorptions, up to the Buddha's ten powers, four fearlessnesses, four unobstructed knowledges, and eighteen unshared dharmas; every item is gathered into ‘because it is unfindable’. At the last it comes down to the forty-two syllable-gates: the gate of the syllable a, ‘because all dharmas from the first do not arise’, all the way to ‘beyond ḍha no syllable can be found’; the Buddha says 「因字有語,因語有名,因名有義」 tr. "from syllables come words, from words come names, from names comes meaning", and hearing one syllable one penetrates the real mark of all dharmas; and the bodhisattva distinguishes and breaks apart the syllables, words empty, names empty, meaning empty, 「得畢竟空,即是般若波羅蜜」 tr. "attaining ultimate emptiness, which is prajñāpāramitā". This is what the Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness wants you to grasp: from the four foundations of mindfulness to the forty-two syllable-gates, every enumerated limb of the path is sealed with ‘because it is unfindable’, all return alike to prajñā's nothing to be attained, and join together to form one body of the Great Vehicle: 「如是等種種分別,是名『菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍』」 tr. "distinctions of every kind such as these are named ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna’".
卷48 〔T25 0402c14〕
大智度論釋四念處品第十九 龍樹菩薩造 後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯 【經】 佛告須菩提:「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍,所謂四念處。何等四? 「須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩,內身中循身觀,亦無身覺,以不可得故;外身中、內外身中循身觀,亦無身覺,以不可得故。勤精進一心,除世間貪憂。內受、內心、內法,外受、外心、外法,內外受、內外心、內外法,循法觀,亦無法覺,以不可得故。勤精進一心,除世間貪憂。 「須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩,云何內身中循身觀?須菩提!若菩薩摩訶薩行時知行,住時知住,坐時知坐,臥時知臥,如身所行,如是知。須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩如是內身中循身觀,勤精進一心,除世間貪憂,以不可得故。 「復次,須菩提!〔T25 0403a〕菩薩摩訶薩若來若去,視瞻一心,屈申俯仰,服僧伽梨,執持衣鉢,飲食、臥息、坐立、睡覺、語默,入禪、出禪,亦常一心。如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜,內身中循身觀,以不可得故。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩內身中循身觀時,一心念:『入息時知入息,出息時知出息;入息長時知入息長,出息長時知出息長;入息短時知入息短,出息短時知出息短。譬如旋師,若旋師弟子,繩長知長,繩短知短。』菩薩摩訶薩,亦如是一心念:『入息時知入息,出息時知出息;入息長時知入息長,出息長時知出息長;入息短時知入息短,出息短時知出息短。』如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩內身中循身觀,勤精進一心,除世間貪憂,以不可得故。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀身四大,作是念:『身中有地大、水大、火大、風大。』譬如屠牛師、若屠牛弟子,以刀殺牛,分作四分,作四分已,若立若坐,觀此四分。菩薩摩訶薩亦如是,行般若波羅蜜時,種種觀身四大:地大、水大、火大、風大。如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩內身中循身觀,以不可得故。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀內身,從足至頂,周匝薄皮,種種不淨充滿身中;作是念:『身中有髮、毛、爪、齒、薄皮、厚皮、筋、肉、骨、髓、脾、腎、心、肝、肺、小腸、大腸、胃、胞、𡱁、尿、垢、汗、目、淚、涕、唾、膿、血、黃、白痰、陰、肪、𦙽、腦、膜。』譬如田夫倉中,隔盛雜穀,種種充滿,稻、麻、黍、粟、豆、麥;明眼之人,開倉即知是麻、是黍、是稻、是粟、是麥、是豆,分別悉知。菩薩摩訶薩亦如是觀是身,從足至頂,周匝薄皮,種種不〔T25 0403b〕淨充滿身中,髮毛、爪齒,乃至腦膜。如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀內身,勤精進一心,除世間貪憂,以不可得故。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見棄死人身,一日、二日,至于五日,膖脹、青瘀,膿汁流出;自念:『我身亦如是相、如是法,未脫此法。』如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩內身中循身觀,勤精進一心,除世間貪憂,以不可得故。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見棄死人身,若六日、若七日,烏、鵄、雕、鷲、犲、狼、狐、狗如是等種種禽獸爴裂食之;自念:『我身如是相、如是法,未脫此法。』如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩內身中循身觀,勤精進一心,除世間貪憂,以不可得故。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見棄死人身,禽獸食已,不淨爛臭;自念:『我身如是相、如是法,未脫此法。』乃至除世間貪憂。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見棄死人身,骨鎖血肉塗染,筋骨相連;自念:『我身如是相、如是法,未脫此法。』乃至除世間貪憂。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見棄死人身,骨瑣血肉已離,筋骨相連;自念:『我身如是相、如是法,未脫此法。』乃至除世間貪憂。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見棄死人身,骨瑣已散在地;自念:『我身如是相、如是法,未脫此法。』如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀內身,乃至除世間貪憂。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見棄死人身,骨散在地,腳骨異處,膞骨、髀骨,腰骨、肋骨,脊骨、手骨,項骨、髑髏,各各異處;自念:『我身如是相、如是法,未脫此法。』如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀內身,乃至除世間貪憂。 「復次,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩見是棄〔T25 0403c〕死人骨在地,歲久風吹日曝,色白如貝;自念:『我身如是相、如是法,未脫此法。』如是,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀內身,乃至除世間貪憂,以不可得故。」 【論】 問曰: 四念處中有種種觀,何以但說十二種觀——所謂若內、若外、若內外? 復次,何等是內?何等是外?內外觀已,何以復別說內外? 復次,四念處中,一念處是內,內法中攝,所謂心;二念處是外,外法中攝,所謂受與法;一念處是內外,內外法中攝,所謂身。 何以說四法都是內、都是外、都是內外? 何以不但言「觀身」,而言「循身觀」? 云何觀身而不生身覺? 何以言「勤精進一心」?三十七品皆應言「一心」,何以但此中言「一心」? 此中若修行四念處時,一切五蓋應除,何以獨言「除貪」?世間喜亦能妨道,何以但言「除憂」? 觀身法種種門:無常、苦、空、無我等,今何以但言「不淨」? 若但觀不淨,何以復念身四威儀等?此事易知,何足問! 答曰: 是十二種觀,行者從此得定心。先來三種邪行,若內、若外、若內外;破三種邪行,是故有三種正行。有人著內情多,著外情少;如人為身故,能捨妻子、親屬、寶物。有人著外情多,著內情少;如人貪財喪身,為欲沒命。有人著內外情多——是故說三種正行。 復次,自身名內身,他身名外身;九受入名為內身,九不受入名為外身;眼等五情名為內身,色等五塵名為外身;如是等分別內、外。 行者先以不淨、無常、苦、空、無我等智慧觀內身,不得是身好相:若淨相,若常相,若樂,若我,若實。內既不得,復〔T25 0404a〕觀外身,求淨、常、我、樂、實亦不可得。若不得便生疑:「我觀內時,於外或錯;觀外時,於內或錯。」今內外一時俱觀,亦不可得。是時心得正定,知是身不淨、無常、苦、空、無我,如病、如癰、如瘡,九孔流穢,是為行廁;不久破壞、離散、盡滅、死相;常有飢渴、寒熱、鞭杖、繫閉,罵詈、毀呰、老病等諸苦常圍遶,不得自在。內空無主,亦無知者、見者,作者、受者,但空諸法因緣和合而有,自生自滅,無所繫屬,猶如草木,是故內外俱觀。 餘內、外義,如十八空中說。 「循身觀」者,尋隨觀察,知其不淨,衰老病死,爛壞臭處,骨節腐敗,摩滅歸土。如我此身,覆以薄皮,令人狂惑,憂畏萬端。以是故,如身相內外隨逐,本末觀察。又如佛說循身觀法。 「不生身覺」者,不取身一異相而生戲論。眾生於是身中起種種覺:有生淨覺,有生不淨覺;有生瞋覺,念他過罪;有人觀此身:「身為何法?諸身分邊為一?為異?」不生如是種種覺。所以者何?無所利益,妨涅槃道故。 復次,餘凡夫、聲聞人取身相能觀身,菩薩不取身相而能觀身。 「勤精進一心」者,餘世事巧便,從無始世界來,常習常作,如離別常人易,離別知識難;離別知識易,離別父子難;離別父子易,自離其身難;自離其身易,離其心者難。自不一心勤精進,此不可得!譬如攢燧求火,一心勤著,不休不息,乃可得火,是故說「一心勤精進」。 「除世間貪憂」者,貪除則五蓋盡去;猶如破竹,初節既破,餘節皆去。復次,行者遠〔T25 0404b〕離五欲,出家學道,既捨世樂,未得定樂,或時心生憂念,如魚樂水。心相如是,常求樂事,還念本所欲。行者多生是二心,是故佛說「當除貪、憂」。說「貪」,即是說世間喜,以相應故。 初觀不淨者,人身不淨,薄皮覆故,先生淨相,後生餘倒;以是故,初說不淨觀。 復次,眾生多著貪欲,取淨相;瞋恚、邪見不爾故,是以先治貪欲,觀不淨。 念身四威儀等者,先欲破身賊;得一心人,所為之事皆能成辦。以是故先尋繹其身所為、所行、來去、臥覺、坐禪觀身所作,常一心安詳,不錯不亂。作如是觀察,以不淨,三昧易得。 身雖安詳,內有種種惡覺觀,破亂其心;以是故,說安那波那十六分以防覺觀。安那般那義,如先說。身既安詳,心無錯亂,然後行不淨觀,安隱牢固。若先行不淨觀,狂心錯亂故,不淨反作淨相。佛法中,此二法名甘露初門。 不淨觀者,所謂菩薩摩訶薩觀身如草木瓦石無異。 是身外四大變為飲食,充實內身:堅者是地,濕者是水,熱者是火,動者是風;是四事入內即是身。是四分中,各各無我、無我所,隨逐自相,不隨人意。苦、空等亦如是說。 「若坐、若立」者,臥則懈怠,身不動故,心亦不動;行則心亂,身不靜故,心亦不靜。 欲以眼見事況所不見,故說譬喻:「牛」即是行者身,「屠兒」即是行者,「刀」是利智慧,「奪牛命」即是破身一相,「四分」即是四大。屠者觀牛四分,更無別牛,亦非是牛;行者觀身四大亦如是。是四大不名為身。所以者何?此〔T25 0404c〕四,身一故;又四大是總相,身是別相;若外四大不名為身,入身中假名為身。我不在四大中,四大不在我中;我去四大遠,但以顛倒妄計為身。用是散空智慧分別四大及造色,然後入三念處,得入道。 又此身從足至髮、從髮至足,周匝薄皮;反覆思惟,無一淨處。髮毛等乃至腦膜,略說則三十六,廣說則眾多。穀倉是身,農夫是行者,田種穀是行者身業因緣。結實入倉,是行者因緣熟得身。稻、麻、黍、粟等,是身中種種不淨。農夫開倉,即知麻、黍、麥、豆種種別異,是行者不淨觀,以慧眼開見是身倉,知此身中不淨充滿,必當敗壞,若他來害,若當自死。此身中但有屎尿不淨、種種惡露等。 已觀內身不淨,今觀外身敗壞;是故說二種不淨:一者、已壞,二者、未壞。先觀己身未壞有識,若結使薄、利根人即生患厭;鈍根結厚者,觀死人已壞,可畏可惡。 若死一日至五日,親里猶尚守護;是時禽獸未食,青瘀、膖脹、膿血流出、腹脹破裂、五藏爛壞,屎尿臭處,甚可惡厭。行者心念:「此色先好,行來、言語,妖蠱姿則,惑亂人情,淫者愛著;今者觀之,好色安在?如佛所說,真是幻法,但誑無智之眼!」今此實事露現,行者即念:「我身與彼,等無有異;未脫此法,云何自著、著彼?又亦何為自重輕他?」如是觀已,心則調伏,可以求道,能除世間貪憂。 又復思惟:此屍初死之時,鳥獸見之,謂非死人,不敢來近;以是故說「過六七日,親戚既去,烏鷲、野干之〔T25 0405a〕屬競來食之。」皮肉既盡,日日變異,以是故說「但有骨人」。見其如此,更生厭心,念言:「是心肝皮肉,實無有我,但因是身合集罪福因緣,受苦無量!」即復自念:「我身不久,會當如是,未離此法。」或時行者見骨人在地,雨水澆浸,日曝風吹,但有白骨;或見久骨筋斷節解,分散異處,其色如鴿;或腐朽爛壞,與土同色。 初觀三十六物,死屍膖脹,一日至五日,是不淨觀。鳥獸來食,乃至與土同色,是無常觀。是中求我、我所不可得,如先說「因緣生,不自在故」,是非我觀。觀身相如此,無一可樂;若有著者,則生憂苦,是名苦觀。 以四聖行觀外身,自知己身亦復如是,然後內外俱觀。 若心散亂,當念老病死、三惡道苦,身命無常,佛法欲滅;如是等,鞭心令伏,還繫不淨觀中,是名「勤精進」。一心勤精進故,能除貪、憂。 貪、憂二賊,劫我法寶,行者作是念:「是身無常,不淨可惡;如此眾生,何故貪著此身,起種種罪因緣?」如是思惟已,知是身中有五情、外有五欲,和合故生世間顛倒樂!人心求樂,初無住時。當觀此樂為實為虛?身為堅固,猶尚散滅,何況此樂! 此樂亦無住處,未來未有,過去已滅,現在不住,念念皆滅;以遮苦故名樂,無有實樂!譬如飲食,除飢渴苦故,暫以為樂,過度則復生苦,如先破樂中說。則知世間樂皆從苦因緣生,亦能生苦果;誑人須臾,後苦無量。譬如美食雜毒,食雖香美,毒則害人;世間樂亦如是。 婬欲煩惱等毒故奪智〔T25 0405b〕慧命,心則狂惑,捨利取衰,誰受此樂?唯有心識。諦觀此心念念生滅,相續有故,可得取相;譬如水波、燈焰。受苦心非樂心,受樂心非苦心,受不苦不樂心非苦樂心,時相各異,以是故心無常。 無常故不自在,不自在故無我。想、思、憶念等亦如是。 餘三念處內外相如先說。 行是四聖行,破四顛倒;破四顛倒故,開實相門;開實相門已,愧本所習;譬人夜食不淨,他了知非,羞愧其事。 觀是四法不淨、無常等,是名苦諦;是苦因愛等諸煩惱,是集諦;愛等諸煩惱斷,是滅諦;斷愛等諸煩惱方便,是道諦。 如是觀四諦,信涅槃道,心住快樂,似如無漏,是名「煖法」。如人攢火,並有煖氣,必望得火。 信此法已,心愛樂佛,是法如佛所說,如服好藥差病,知師為妙;諸服藥病差者,人中第一,是則信僧——如是信三寶。煖法增進,罪福停等故,名為「頂法」。如人上山至頂,兩邊道里俱等。從頂至忍,乃至阿羅漢,是一邊道;從煖至頂是一邊道。 聲聞法中觀四念處,所得果報如是。 菩薩法者,於是觀中不忘本願,不捨大悲,先用不可得空調伏心地,住是地中,雖有煩惱,心常不墮;如人雖未殺賊,繫閉一處。 菩薩頂法,如先法位中說。 忍法、世間第一法,則是菩薩柔順法忍。 須陀洹道,乃至阿羅漢、辟支佛道,即是菩薩無生法忍。如佛後品自說:「須陀洹若智、若果,皆是菩薩無生法忍。」 四正勤、四如意足,雖各各別位,皆在四念處中。慧多故,名「四〔T25 0405c〕念處」;精進多故,名「四正勤」;定多故,名「四如意足」。 問曰: 若爾者,何以不說「智處」而說「念處」? 答曰: 初習行時,未及有智;念為初門,常念其事,是智慧隨念故,以「念」為名。四念處實體是智慧。所以者何?觀內外身,即是智慧;念持智慧在緣中,不令散亂,故名「念處」。 與九十六種邪行求道相違,故名「正勤」。諸外道等捨五欲自苦身,不能捨惡不善,不能集諸善法。佛有兩種斷惡不善法:已來者除却,未來者防使不生;善法亦有二種:未生善法令生,已生善法令增長,是名「正勤」。 智慧火得正勤風,無所不燒。正勤若過,心則散亂,智火微弱;如火得風,過者或滅、或微,不能燒照。是故須定以制過精進風,則可得定。定有四種:欲定、精進定、心定、思惟定。制四念處中過智慧,是時定慧道得精進故,所欲如意;後得如意事辦故名「如意足」。足者,名如意因緣,亦名分。 是十二法,鈍根人中名為「根」,如樹有根未有力;若利根人中名為「力」,是事了了,能疾有所辦,如利刀截物故名有力。事未辦故名為「道」;事辦,思惟修行故名為「覺」。 三十七品論議,如先說。 問曰: 若菩薩修此三十七品,云何不取涅槃? 答曰: 本願牢故,大悲心深入故,了了知諸法實相故,十方諸佛護念故。如經說:「菩薩到七住地,外觀諸法空,內觀無我;如人夢中縛栰渡河,中流而覺。作是念:『我空自疲苦,無河無栰,我何所渡?』菩薩爾時亦如是,心則悔厭:『我何所度?何所〔T25 0406a〕滅?』且欲自滅倒心。是時,十方佛伸手摩頭:『善哉!佛子!莫生悔心!念汝本願!汝雖知此,眾生未悟,汝當以此空法教化眾生。汝所得者,始是一門;諸佛無量身、無量音聲、無量法門、一切智慧等,汝皆未得。汝觀諸法空故,著是涅槃;諸法空中無有滅處,無有著處;若實有滅,汝先來已滅。汝未具足六波羅蜜乃至十八不共法;汝當具足此法,坐於道場,如諸佛法。』」 復次,三三昧、十一智、三無漏根、覺觀三昧、十念、四禪、四無量心、四無色定、八背捨、九次第定,如先說。 復次,佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法,如初品中說。 是諸法後皆用無所得故。以般若波羅蜜畢竟空和合故名「除世間貪憂,以不可得故」。
《大智度論》卷48 · T25n1509
The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.
四念處總標:身、受、心、法,內外俱觀,皆以不可得故
佛陀告訴須菩提:『菩薩摩訶薩的摩訶衍(大乘),就是所謂的四念處。是哪四種呢?
『須菩提啊!菩薩摩訶薩,在內身之中就著身體循序觀察,卻不生起身的實有之覺,因為身終究不可得的緣故;在外身之中、在內外身之中就著身體循序觀察,也不生起身覺,因為不可得的緣故。如此勤加精進、專一其心,除去世間的貪與憂。對於內受、內心、內法,外受、外心、外法,內外受、內外心、內外法,也都循著而觀察,不生起法的實有之覺,因為不可得的緣故。同樣勤加精進、專一其心,除去世間的貪與憂。』
身念處(一):行住坐臥,如身所行,如是而知
『須菩提啊!菩薩摩訶薩要怎樣在內身之中就著身體循序觀察呢?須菩提!如果菩薩摩訶薩行走時知道自己在行走,安住時知道自己在安住,端坐時知道自己在端坐,臥息時知道自己在臥息;身體正在做什麼,就如實這樣知道。須菩提啊!菩薩摩訶薩就這樣在內身之中就著身體循序觀察,勤加精進、專一其心,除去世間的貪與憂,因為身不可得的緣故。』
身念處(二):往來俯仰、著衣持鉢、動靜語默,也常一心
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若前來、若離去,舉目瞻視都專一其心,屈伸手臂、俯身仰首,披著僧伽梨(大衣),拿持衣鉢,飲食、臥息、坐立、睡覺、言語與靜默,入於禪定、出於禪定,也都常常專一其心。就這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩修行般若波羅蜜,在內身之中就著身體循序觀察,因為身不可得的緣故。』
身念處(三):入息出息,隨息長短而知,如旋師執繩
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩在內身之中就著身體循序觀察時,專一其心地念念了知:「入息的時候知道是入息,出息的時候知道是出息;入息長的時候知道入息長,出息長的時候知道出息長;入息短的時候知道入息短,出息短的時候知道出息短。就像轉繩的師傅或轉繩師傅的弟子,繩子長就知道長,繩子短就知道短。」菩薩摩訶薩也是這樣專一其心地念念了知:「入息時知道入息,出息時知道出息;入息長時知道入息長,出息長時知道出息長;入息短時知道入息短,出息短時知道出息短。」就這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩在內身之中就著身體循序觀察,勤加精進、專一其心,除去世間的貪與憂,因為身不可得的緣故。』
身念處(四):觀身四大,如屠牛人分作四分
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀察身中的四大,這樣念道:「身中有地大、水大、火大、風大。」就像屠牛的師傅或屠牛師傅的弟子,用刀殺了牛,把牠分作四分;分作四分之後,或站或坐,觀看這四分。菩薩摩訶薩也是這樣,修行般若波羅蜜時,種種觀察身中的四大——地大、水大、火大、風大。就這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩在內身之中就著身體循序觀察,因為身不可得的緣故。』
身念處(五):從足至頂三十六物不淨,如明眼人開穀倉
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀察內身,從腳底一直到頭頂,周身裹著一層薄皮,種種不淨充滿在身中;這樣念道:「身中有頭髮、體毛、指甲、牙齒、薄皮、厚皮、筋、肉、骨、髓、脾、腎、心、肝、肺、小腸、大腸、胃、膀胱、屎、尿、垢、汗、眼、淚、鼻涕、唾液、膿、血、黃、白痰、脂肪的陰膏、肥肪、肪膏、腦、膜。」就像農夫的糧倉裡,隔成一格格盛裝各種穀物,種種充滿其中,有稻、麻、黍、粟、豆、麥;明眼的人一打開糧倉就知道:這是麻、這是黍、這是稻、這是粟、這是麥、這是豆,樣樣分別得清清楚楚。菩薩摩訶薩也是這樣觀察這身體,從腳底到頭頂,周身裹著薄皮,種種不淨充滿身中,從頭髮、體毛、指甲、牙齒,一直到腦、膜。就這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀察內身,勤加精進、專一其心,除去世間的貪與憂,因為身不可得的緣故。』
身念處(六):死屍九觀,從膖脹青瘀到白骨如貝
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見到被棄置的死人身體,經過一日、二日,乃至五日,膖脹起來、發青發紫,膿汁流淌出來;便自己念道:「我這身體也是這樣的形相、這樣的法則,還沒有脫離這法則。」就這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩在內身之中就著身體循序觀察,勤加精進、專一其心,除去世間的貪與憂,因為身不可得的緣故。
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見到被棄置的死人身體,經過六日、七日,被烏鴉、鵄鳥、雕、鷲、豺、狼、狐、狗,如此等等種種禽獸抓裂啃食;便自己念道:「我這身體也是這樣的形相、這樣的法則,還沒有脫離這法則。」就這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩在內身之中就著身體循序觀察,勤加精進、專一其心,除去世間的貪與憂,因為身不可得的緣故。
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見到被棄置的死人身體,禽獸吃過之後,殘穢不淨、潰爛發臭;便自己念道:「我這身體也是這樣的形相、這樣的法則,還沒有脫離這法則。」乃至除去世間的貪與憂。
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見到被棄置的死人身體,只剩骨架,殘餘的血肉塗抹沾染,筋與骨還相連著;便自己念道:「我這身體也是這樣的形相、這樣的法則,還沒有脫離這法則。」乃至除去世間的貪與憂。
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見到被棄置的死人身體,骨架上的血肉已經剝離,筋與骨還相連著;便自己念道:「我這身體也是這樣的形相、這樣的法則,還沒有脫離這法則。」乃至除去世間的貪與憂。
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見到被棄置的死人身體,骨架已經散落在地上;便自己念道:「我這身體也是這樣的形相、這樣的法則,還沒有脫離這法則。」就這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀察內身,乃至除去世間的貪與憂。
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩若見到被棄置的死人身體,骨頭散落在地上,腳骨在一處,小腿骨、大腿骨,腰骨、肋骨,脊骨、手骨,頸骨、頭骨,各各散在不同的地方;便自己念道:「我這身體也是這樣的形相、這樣的法則,還沒有脫離這法則。」就這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀察內身,乃至除去世間的貪與憂。
『再者,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩見到這被棄置的死人骨頭留在地上,年深日久,風吹日曬,顏色白得像海貝;便自己念道:「我這身體也是這樣的形相、這樣的法則,還沒有脫離這法則。」就這樣,須菩提!菩薩摩訶薩觀察內身,乃至除去世間的貪與憂,因為身不可得的緣故。』
論主先設十問:十二觀、內外、循身觀、身覺、一心、除貪憂、不淨、四威儀
以下是論釋。
有人問:四念處中有種種觀法,為什麼只說十二種觀——也就是若內、若外、若內外這三重乘以身受心法四處?再者,什麼是內?什麼是外?既然已經作了內觀、外觀,為什麼又要另外說內外觀?
再者,四念處之中,有一個念處是內,攝在內法之中,也就是心念處;有二個念處是外,攝在外法之中,也就是受念處與法念處;有一個念處是內外,攝在內外法之中,也就是身念處。既然如此,為什麼又說這四法都是內、都是外、都是內外呢?
為什麼不只說「觀身」,卻要說「循身觀」?怎樣觀身而不生起身覺?為什麼要說「勤精進一心」?三十七道品都應該說「一心」,為什麼偏在這裡說「一心」?在這裡若修行四念處時,一切五蓋都應當除去,為什麼單說「除貪」?世間的喜悅也一樣能妨礙道業,為什麼只說「除憂」?觀身的法門種種不同——無常、苦、空、無我等等,如今為什麼只說「不淨」?若只是要觀不淨,為什麼又要念身的四威儀等等?這種事一看就知道,哪裡值得問!
答十二觀:破三種邪行,行者從此得定心
論主答:這十二種觀,修行的人從此得到定心。先前有三種邪行——著於內、著於外、著於內外;為了破這三種邪行,所以有三種正行。有人著於內的心情多、著於外的心情少,就像有人為了自身的緣故,能捨棄妻子、親屬、財寶;有人著於外的心情多、著於內的心情少,就像有人貪求財物而喪身、為了欲望而沒命;有人著於內、著於外的心情都多——為了對治這三種偏著,所以說三種正行。
再者,自身叫作內身,他人之身叫作外身;能領受的九入(眼耳鼻舌身意等具識之根)叫作內身,不能領受的九入(外境等無識之處)叫作外身;眼等五種情根叫作內身,色等五塵叫作外身;像這樣種種來分別內與外。
內外身四重分別,內外俱觀乃得正定
修行的人先用不淨、無常、苦、空、無我等等智慧觀察內身,得不到這身的美好之相:找不到淨相,找不到常相,找不到樂,找不到我,找不到實。內身既然得不到,再觀察外身,尋求淨、常、我、樂、實,也同樣不可得。若還是得不到,便生起疑惑:「我觀內身的時候,對外身或許看錯了;觀外身的時候,對內身或許看錯了。」如今把內、外一時一起觀察,也還是不可得。這時心得到正定,了知這身不淨、無常、苦、空、無我,如同疾病、如同癰腫、如同瘡口,九個孔竅流淌著穢物,這身就是一座移動的廁所;不久便要破壞、離散、盡滅,滿是死亡之相;常有飢渴、寒熱、鞭杖、繫閉、辱罵、詆毀、老病等等眾苦,時時圍繞,不得自在。內裡空虛,沒有一個主宰,也沒有能知的人、能見的人,能造作的人、能領受的人,只是空空的諸法因緣和合而有,自然生起、自然消滅,無所繫屬,就像草木一樣。正因如此,所以要內外一起觀察。
其餘內、外的義理,如「十八空」之中所說。
釋「循身觀」、「不生身覺」:尋隨觀察而不起戲論
所謂「循身觀」,就是尋著身相隨順觀察,了知它的不淨,衰老病死,潰爛發臭,骨節腐敗,磨滅而歸於塵土。就像我這身體,只覆著一層薄皮,卻叫人癡狂迷惑,生出萬端的憂慮怖畏。正因如此,要順著身相的內外循序追隨,從本到末地觀察。又如佛陀所說的循身觀之法。
所謂「不生身覺」,就是不執取身是一、是異的相狀而生起戲論。眾生在這身中生起種種覺想:有的生淨的覺想,有的生不淨的覺想;有的生瞋恚的覺想,念著他人的過罪;有人觀察這身:「身究竟是什麼法?諸身分的邊際是一?還是異?」——不生起這樣種種的覺想。為什麼呢?因為毫無利益,反而妨礙涅槃之道。
再者,其餘凡夫、聲聞人是執取身相才能觀身,菩薩則不執取身相而能觀身。
釋「勤精進一心」、「除世間貪憂」:攢燧求火,破竹去節
所謂「勤精進一心」:其餘的世俗事務巧便,從無始的世界以來,常常串習、常常造作,就像離別尋常的人容易、離別知交難;離別知交容易、離別父子難;離別父子容易、離別自身難;離別自身容易、離別自己的心難。若自己不專一其心、勤加精進,這是辦不到的!就像鑽木求火,一心勤懇地鑽著,不停歇、不止息,才能得火,所以說「一心勤精進」。
所謂「除世間貪憂」:貪一除去,五蓋便都掃盡;就像剖破竹子,最初一節既破,其餘各節都跟著裂開。再者,修行的人遠離五欲,出家學道,既已捨了世間之樂,又還未得禪定之樂,有時心裡生起憂念,就像魚兒貪戀水。心相就是這樣,常常追求樂事,回頭又念著本來所欲的。修行人多半生起這兩種心,所以佛陀說「應當除去貪、憂」。說「貪」,也就是說世間的喜悅,因為二者相應的緣故。
何以先觀不淨、何以先念四威儀
最初觀不淨的緣故:人身本是不淨,只因薄皮覆蓋,先生起淨的相想,隨後又生其餘的顛倒;正因如此,最初說不淨觀。
再者,眾生多半貪著欲樂,執取淨相;瞋恚、邪見卻不是這樣,所以先對治貪欲,觀不淨。
念身四威儀等等的緣故:先要破除這身賊;得了一心的人,所做的事都能成辦。正因如此,先要尋繹這身所做、所行,來去、臥覺、坐禪,觀察身所造作,常常一心安詳,不錯亂。作這樣的觀察,用不淨去看,三昧就容易得。
安那般那防覺觀,此二法為甘露初門;不淨觀身如草木瓦石
身雖安詳,內裡卻有種種惡的覺觀擾亂其心;正因如此,說安那波那(出入息)十六分來防護覺觀。安那般那的義理,如前面所說。身既安詳,心無錯亂,然後修行不淨觀,才安隱牢固。若先修不淨觀,因狂心錯亂的緣故,反而把不淨當作淨相。在佛法之中,這兩種法(不淨觀與安那般那)叫作甘露的初門。
所謂不淨觀,就是菩薩摩訶薩觀這身體如同草木瓦石,沒有兩樣。
四大如屠牛四分,我不在四大中;穀倉喻三十六物
這身外的四大變為飲食,充實內身:堅硬的是地,濕潤的是水,溫熱的是火,動搖的是風;這四樣入內就是身。這四分之中,各各無我、無我所,隨順著各自的自相,不隨人的意願。苦、空等等也是這樣說。
所謂「若坐、若立」:臥著就懈怠,身不動,心也就不動;行走則心亂,身不靜,心也就不靜。
為了用眼睛能見的事來比況所不能見的,所以說這譬喻:「牛」就是修行者的身,「屠夫」就是修行者,「刀」是鋒利的智慧,「奪牛之命」就是破身是一的相,「四分」就是四大。屠夫觀牛的四分,再沒有另一頭牛,也不是牛;修行者觀身的四大也是這樣。這四大不叫作身。為什麼呢?這四大,怎能是同一個身?何況四大是總相、身是別相;若外四大不叫作身,入到身中才假名為身。我不在四大之中,四大不在我之中;我離四大很遠,只因顛倒而妄自計執為身。用這散空的智慧分別四大以及所造之色,然後入於後三念處(受、心、法),才能入道。
又這身從腳到髮、從髮到腳,周身裹著薄皮;反覆思惟,沒有一處是淨的。頭髮、體毛等等一直到腦膜,略說是三十六物,廣說則眾多。糧倉就是身,農夫就是修行者,田裡種穀就是修行者的身業因緣;結了果實收入糧倉,就是修行者因緣成熟而得的身。稻、麻、黍、粟等等,就是身中種種不淨。農夫打開糧倉,就知道麻、黍、麥、豆種種各異;這就是修行者的不淨觀,以慧眼打開這身的糧倉去看,知道這身中不淨充滿,終將敗壞,若被他人來害,若當自死。這身中只有屎尿不淨、種種惡露等等。
已壞未壞二種不淨;死屍變壞歷歷可見
已經觀了內身不淨,如今觀外身的敗壞;所以說二種不淨:一是已壞,二是未壞。先觀自身尚未破壞、還有心識的狀態,若結使淡薄、根性伶俐的人,立刻生起厭患;根性鈍、結使深厚的人,就觀已壞的死人,可畏可惡。
若死了一日到五日,親里還在守護;這時禽獸還沒來吃,青瘀、膖脹、膿血流出、肚腹脹裂、五臟潰爛,屎尿臭穢,非常可惡可厭。修行的人心念:「這色身先前那樣美好,來去、言語,妖媚蠱惑、姿態萬千,迷亂人的情意,好淫的人愛著它;如今一看,那美好的顏色在哪裡?如佛陀所說,真是幻化之法,只是欺誑無智慧的眼睛罷了!」如今這實情顯露出來,修行的人便念:「我的身與那具屍體,相等而沒有差別;都還沒脫離這法則,為什麼要自愛、又愛著別人?又何必看重自己、輕賤他人?」這樣觀了以後,心便調伏,可以用來求道,能除世間的貪與憂。
再進一步思惟:這屍體初死之時,鳥獸見了,以為不是死人,不敢靠近;正因如此,所以說「過了六七日,親戚既已離去,烏鴉、鷲鳥、野干之類爭相前來啃食牠。」皮肉既盡,一天天變異,正因如此,所以說「只剩一具骨人」。見到這樣,更生厭離之心,念道:「這心、肝、皮、肉,其實沒有我,只因這身聚集了罪福的因緣,承受無量的苦!」隨即又自念:「我這身不久,終要變成這樣,還沒離開這法則。」有時修行的人見骨人在地上,被雨水澆浸,日曬風吹,只剩白骨;有時見那年久的骨頭筋斷節解,散落各處,顏色像鴿子;有時腐朽潰爛,與泥土同一顏色。
死屍配不淨、無常、非我、苦四觀,四聖行內外俱觀
最初觀三十六物,死屍膖脹,從一日到五日,這是不淨觀。鳥獸來吃,乃至與泥土同色,這是無常觀。在這中間尋求我、我所都不可得,如前面所說「因緣而生、不得自在」的緣故,這是非我觀。觀身相如此,沒有一樣可樂;若有貪著的人,便生憂苦,這叫作苦觀。
用這四種聖行(不淨、無常、非我、苦)觀外身,自知自己的身也是如此,然後內外一起觀察。
鞭心令伏能除貪憂;貪憂二賊與世間樂之虛妄
若心散亂,就當念老病死、三惡道的苦,身命無常,佛法將滅;用這些來鞭策己心使它降伏,再繫回到不淨觀中,這叫作「勤精進」。因為一心勤精進的緣故,能除貪、憂。
貪、憂這兩個賊,劫奪我的法寶,修行的人這樣念:「這身無常,不淨可惡;這樣的眾生,為什麼還貪著這身,起種種造罪的因緣?」這樣思惟以後,知道這身中有內五情、外有五欲,二者和合,所以生出世間顛倒之樂!人心追求樂,最初沒有停歇的時候。應當觀這樂是實、是虛?身尚且堅固,還要散滅,何況這樂!
婬欲奪慧命,心念念生滅故無常無我
這樂也沒有安住之處,未來的還沒有,過去的已消滅,現在的不停住,念念都在消滅;只因遮去了苦,才叫作樂,並沒有真實的樂!就像飲食,只因除去飢渴之苦,暫且當作樂,過了度又再生苦,如前面「破樂」中所說。可知世間的樂都從苦的因緣生,也能生出苦的果報;欺誑人於須臾之間,後來的苦卻無量。就像美食摻了毒,食物雖香美,毒卻害人;世間的樂也是這樣。
因為婬欲、煩惱等等的毒,奪去了智慧之命,心便狂亂迷惑,捨了利益、取了衰損,是誰在受這樂呢?只有心識罷了。仔細觀這心念念生滅,因為相續不斷,才可以取得它的相;就像水波、燈焰。受苦的心不是受樂的心,受樂的心不是受苦的心,受不苦不樂的心不是受苦樂的心,各時的心相各不相同,正因如此,心是無常。
因為無常,所以不自在;因為不自在,所以無我。想、思、憶念等等也是這樣。
其餘三念處(受、心、法)的內外之相,如前面所說。
四聖行破四顛倒,配四諦入煖法、頂法
修這四種聖行,破四種顛倒(淨、樂、常、我);因為破了四顛倒,所以打開實相之門;打開實相之門以後,便慚愧自己本來所串習的。就像人在夜裡吃了不淨之物,別人指明那不是好東西,他便為這事羞愧。
觀這四法的不淨、無常等等,這叫作苦諦;這苦是由愛等等諸煩惱而來,這是集諦;愛等等諸煩惱斷除,這是滅諦;斷愛等等諸煩惱的方便,這是道諦。
這樣觀四諦,深信涅槃之道,心安住於快樂,好像已是無漏,這叫作「煖法」。就像人鑽火,並已有了煖氣,必定盼望得火。
信了這法以後,心愛樂佛,這法正如佛陀所說,就像服了好藥病癒,便知道醫師的高明;諸服藥而病癒的人,是人中第一,這便是信僧——這樣信三寶。煖法增長精進,罪與福停勻相等的緣故,叫作「頂法」。就像人上山到了山頂,兩邊的路途都相等。從頂到忍,一直到阿羅漢,是一邊的路;從煖到頂,是另一邊的路。
聲聞果報與菩薩不共:不忘本願,柔順忍與無生法忍
聲聞法中觀四念處,所得的果報就是如此。
菩薩之法,則是在這觀中不忘本願,不捨大悲,先用不可得的空調伏心地,安住在這心地之中,雖然還有煩惱,心卻常常不墮落;就像人雖還沒殺賊,卻把牠繫閉在一處。
菩薩的頂法,如前面「法位」中所說。
忍法、世間第一法,就是菩薩的柔順法忍。
須陀洹道,乃至阿羅漢、辟支佛道,就是菩薩的無生法忍。如佛陀在後面品中自己說:「須陀洹的智慧或果證,都是菩薩的無生法忍。」
四念處、四正勤、四如意足:慧、精進、定之分工;何以名念處
四正勤、四如意足,雖然各各另有其位次,卻都在四念處之中。因為慧多的緣故,叫作「四念處」;因為精進多的緣故,叫作「四正勤」;因為定多的緣故,叫作「四如意足」。
有人問:若是這樣,為什麼不說「智處」而說「念處」?論主答:最初串習修行的時候,還來不及有智慧;念是最初的門,常念著它的事相,這智慧是隨著念而起的緣故,所以用「念」來命名。四念處真實的體是智慧。為什麼呢?觀內外身,就是智慧;用念把智慧持在所緣境中,不讓它散亂,所以叫作「念處」。
正勤、如意足釋名,根、力、道、覺之辨
因為與九十六種邪行求道相違背,所以叫作「正勤」。諸外道等等捨了五欲、自苦其身,卻不能捨惡、不善,也不能積集諸善法。佛有兩種斷惡、不善之法:已經來的把它除去,還沒來的防它不生;善法也有兩種:未生的善法令它生,已生的善法令它增長,這叫作「正勤」。
智慧之火得了正勤之風,無所不燒。正勤若過了頭,心便散亂,智火反而微弱;就像火得了風,過了頭有時反而滅、或變微,不能燒照。所以要用定來制過度的精進之風,才可以得定。定有四種:欲定、精進定、心定、思惟定。制伏四念處中過度的智慧,這時定與慧之道因得了精進,所欲的都能如意;後來得了如意、事情辦成的緣故,叫作「如意足」。所謂「足」,是說如意的因緣,也叫作「分」。
這十二法(四念處、四正勤、四如意足),在鈍根的人中叫作「根」,就像樹有了根卻還沒有力;在利根的人中叫作「力」,這事明明白白,能迅速有所成辦,就像利刀截物,所以叫有力。事情還沒辦成,叫作「道」;事情辦成,思惟修行,叫作「覺」。
三十七道品的論議,如前面所說。
修三十七品何以不取涅槃:十方佛摩頭勸發;諸法如先說,收於無所得
有人問:若菩薩修這三十七道品,為什麼不取涅槃?論主答:因為本願牢固的緣故,因為大悲心深入的緣故,因為明明了了地知道諸法實相的緣故,因為十方諸佛護念的緣故。如經上所說:「菩薩到了第七住地,向外觀諸法空,向內觀無我;就像人在夢中綁了木筏渡河,渡到中流卻醒了,這樣念道:『我白白地自受疲苦,並沒有河、沒有筏,我渡的是什麼?』菩薩那時也是這樣,心便懊悔厭離:『我渡的是什麼?滅的是什麼?』只想自滅那顛倒之心。這時,十方佛伸手摩他的頭:『善哉!佛子!莫生悔心!念你的本願!你雖知道這一點,眾生卻還沒悟,你應當用這空法教化眾生。你所得到的,才只是一道門;諸佛無量的身、無量的音聲、無量的法門、一切智慧等等,你都還沒得到。你因觀諸法空的緣故,便執著這涅槃;諸法空中並沒有可滅之處,也沒有可著之處;若真實有滅,你先前早已滅了。你還沒具足六波羅蜜乃至十八不共法;你應當具足這法,坐於道場,如諸佛之法。』」
再者,三三昧、十一智、三無漏根、覺觀三昧、十念、四禪、四無量心、四無色定、八背捨、九次第定,如前面所說。
再者,佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法,如最初一品中所說。
這一切諸法,最後都用無所得的緣故(而成)。因為以般若波羅蜜的畢竟空與之和合,所以叫作「除世間貪憂,以不可得故」。
The Four Foundations of Mindfulness Set Out: Body, Feeling, Mind, and Dharmas, Contemplated Inwardly and Outwardly, All Because They Cannot Be Found
The Buddha told Subhūti: ‘The Mahāyāna (the Great Vehicle) of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is what are called the four foundations of mindfulness. What are the four?
‘Subhūti! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva, within the inner body, contemplates by following the body through, yet does not give rise to the notion of a body as real, because the body in the end cannot be found; within the outer body, and within the inner-and-outer body, he contemplates by following the body through, and likewise does not give rise to the notion of a body, because it cannot be found. In this way he exerts himself with vigour, makes his mind single, and removes the craving and sorrow of the world. With regard to inner feelings, inner mind, and inner dharmas, outer feelings, outer mind, and outer dharmas, and inner-and-outer feelings, inner-and-outer mind, and inner-and-outer dharmas, he likewise contemplates by following them through, and does not give rise to the notion of dharmas as real, because they cannot be found. In the same way he exerts himself with vigour, makes his mind single, and removes the craving and sorrow of the world.’
The Foundation of Mindfulness of the Body (1): Walking, Standing, Sitting, and Lying Down—As the Body Acts, So He Knows
‘Subhūti! How does the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, within the inner body, contemplate by following the body through? Subhūti! If, when the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is walking, he knows that he is walking; when he is standing, he knows that he is standing; when he is sitting upright, he knows that he is sitting upright; when he is lying down to rest, he knows that he is lying down to rest; whatever the body is doing, he knows it just so, as it truly is. Subhūti! It is in this way that the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, within the inner body, contemplates by following the body through, exerts himself with vigour, makes his mind single, and removes the craving and sorrow of the world, because the body cannot be found.’
The Foundation of Mindfulness of the Body (2): Coming and Going, Bending and Raising, Wearing the Robe and Holding the Bowl, Moving and Still, Speaking and Silent—Always with a Single Mind
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! Whether the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is coming forward or going away, he looks and gazes with a single mind; bending and stretching his arms, bowing his body and raising his head, putting on the saṃghāṭī (the great robe), holding his robe and bowl, eating and drinking, lying down to rest, sitting and standing, sleeping, speaking and keeping silent, entering meditative absorption and emerging from meditative absorption—in all of these, too, he always makes his mind single. In this way, Subhūti, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva practises prajñāpāramitā and, within the inner body, contemplates by following the body through, because the body cannot be found.’
The Foundation of Mindfulness of the Body (3): The In-Breath and the Out-Breath, Known According to Their Length, Like a Rope-Turner Holding the Cord
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! When the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, within the inner body, contemplates by following the body through, he knows it moment by moment with a single mind: “When breathing in, he knows he is breathing in; when breathing out, he knows he is breathing out; when the in-breath is long, he knows the in-breath is long; when the out-breath is long, he knows the out-breath is long; when the in-breath is short, he knows the in-breath is short; when the out-breath is short, he knows the out-breath is short. It is like a master rope-turner, or a master rope-turner's apprentice: when the cord is long he knows it is long, and when the cord is short he knows it is short.” The bodhisattva-mahāsattva likewise knows it moment by moment with a single mind: “When breathing in, he knows he is breathing in; when breathing out, he knows he is breathing out; when the in-breath is long, he knows the in-breath is long; when the out-breath is long, he knows the out-breath is long; when the in-breath is short, he knows the in-breath is short; when the out-breath is short, he knows the out-breath is short.” In this way, Subhūti, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, within the inner body, contemplates by following the body through, exerts himself with vigour, makes his mind single, and removes the craving and sorrow of the world, because the body cannot be found.’
The Foundation of Mindfulness of the Body (4): Contemplating the Four Great Elements of the Body, Like a Cattle-Butcher Dividing the Carcass into Four Parts
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates the four great elements in the body and reflects thus: “In the body there are the earth element, the water element, the fire element, and the wind element.” It is like a master cattle-butcher, or a master cattle-butcher's apprentice, who kills an ox with a knife and divides it into four parts; having divided it into four parts, whether standing or sitting, he looks at these four parts. The bodhisattva-mahāsattva is likewise: when practising prajñāpāramitā, he contemplates in all kinds of ways the four great elements in the body—the earth element, the water element, the fire element, and the wind element. In this way, Subhūti, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, within the inner body, contemplates by following the body through, because the body cannot be found.’
The Foundation of Mindfulness of the Body (5): The Thirty-Six Impure Things from Sole to Crown, Like a Clear-Eyed Man Opening a Granary
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates the inner body from the soles of the feet right up to the crown of the head, wrapped all round in a thin skin, with all kinds of impurities filling the body; and he reflects thus: “In the body there are head-hair, body-hair, nails, teeth, thin skin, thick skin, sinews, flesh, bones, marrow, spleen, kidneys, heart, liver, lungs, small intestine, large intestine, stomach, bladder, excrement, urine, grime, sweat, eyes, tears, nasal mucus, saliva, pus, blood, yellow humour, white phlegm, the fatty grease, fat, suet, brain, and membranes.” It is like a farmer's granary, partitioned into compartments holding various grains, filled with all kinds of things—rice, sesame, millet, foxtail millet, beans, and wheat; a clear-eyed man, as soon as he opens the granary, knows: this is sesame, this is millet, this is rice, this is foxtail millet, this is wheat, this is beans, telling each kind apart quite clearly. The bodhisattva-mahāsattva likewise contemplates this body, from the soles of the feet to the crown of the head, wrapped all round in thin skin, with all kinds of impurities filling the body, from head-hair, body-hair, nails, and teeth, right up to brain and membranes. In this way, Subhūti, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates the inner body, exerts himself with vigour, makes his mind single, and removes the craving and sorrow of the world, because the body cannot be found.’
The Foundation of Mindfulness of the Body (6): The Nine Contemplations of the Corpse, from Bloated and Livid to White Bones Like Shells
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! If the bodhisattva-mahāsattva sees the body of a dead person that has been cast away, after one day, two days, up to five days, swollen and bloated, turned livid and purple, with pus flowing out, he then reflects to himself: “This body of mine too has this form, this nature; it has not yet escaped this nature.” In this way, Subhūti, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, within the inner body, contemplates by following the body through, exerts himself with vigour, makes his mind single, and removes the craving and sorrow of the world, because the body cannot be found.
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! If the bodhisattva-mahāsattva sees the body of a dead person that has been cast away, after six days, seven days, torn and devoured by crows, kites, eagles, vultures, jackals, wolves, foxes, dogs, and all kinds of birds and beasts such as these, he then reflects to himself: “This body of mine too has this form, this nature; it has not yet escaped this nature.” In this way, Subhūti, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, within the inner body, contemplates by following the body through, exerts himself with vigour, makes his mind single, and removes the craving and sorrow of the world, because the body cannot be found.
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! If the bodhisattva-mahāsattva sees the body of a dead person that has been cast away, after the birds and beasts have eaten it, with its leftover filth impure, festering and stinking, he then reflects to himself: “This body of mine too has this form, this nature; it has not yet escaped this nature.” And so on, up to removing the craving and sorrow of the world.
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! If the bodhisattva-mahāsattva sees the body of a dead person that has been cast away, with only the skeleton left, smeared and stained with the remaining blood and flesh, the sinews and bones still joined together, he then reflects to himself: “This body of mine too has this form, this nature; it has not yet escaped this nature.” And so on, up to removing the craving and sorrow of the world.
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! If the bodhisattva-mahāsattva sees the body of a dead person that has been cast away, the blood and flesh on the skeleton already stripped away, the sinews and bones still joined together, he then reflects to himself: “This body of mine too has this form, this nature; it has not yet escaped this nature.” And so on, up to removing the craving and sorrow of the world.
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! If the bodhisattva-mahāsattva sees the body of a dead person that has been cast away, the skeleton already scattered on the ground, he then reflects to himself: “This body of mine too has this form, this nature; it has not yet escaped this nature.” In this way, Subhūti, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates the inner body, and so on, up to removing the craving and sorrow of the world.
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! If the bodhisattva-mahāsattva sees the body of a dead person that has been cast away, the bones scattered on the ground—the foot bones in one place, the shin bones, the thigh bones, the hip bones, the rib bones, the spine, the arm bones, the neck bones, the skull, each scattered in a different place—he then reflects to himself: “This body of mine too has this form, this nature; it has not yet escaped this nature.” In this way, Subhūti, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates the inner body, and so on, up to removing the craving and sorrow of the world.
‘Furthermore, Subhūti! The bodhisattva-mahāsattva sees the bones of this dead person that has been cast away left on the ground, over many years and long days, blown by the wind and baked by the sun, their colour as white as sea-shells; he then reflects to himself: “This body of mine too has this form, this nature; it has not yet escaped this nature.” In this way, Subhūti, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates the inner body, and so on, up to removing the craving and sorrow of the world, because the body cannot be found.’
The Treatise-Author First Sets Out Ten Questions: The Twelve Contemplations, Inner and Outer, Contemplating by Following the Body, the Notion of a Body, the Single Mind, Removing Craving and Sorrow, Impurity, and the Four Postures
What follows is the treatise's explanation.
Question: Within the four foundations of mindfulness there are all kinds of methods of contemplation; why are only twelve kinds of contemplation spoken of—that is, the threefold inner, outer, and inner-and-outer, multiplied by the four places of body, feeling, mind, and dharmas? Furthermore, what is inner? What is outer? Since inner contemplation and outer contemplation have already been made, why is inner-and-outer contemplation spoken of separately as well?
Furthermore, among the four foundations of mindfulness, one foundation of mindfulness is inner, included among inner dharmas—namely, the foundation of mindfulness of the mind; two foundations of mindfulness are outer, included among outer dharmas—namely, the foundation of mindfulness of feelings and the foundation of mindfulness of dharmas; one foundation of mindfulness is inner-and-outer, included among inner-and-outer dharmas—namely, the foundation of mindfulness of the body. That being so, why is it said again that these four dharmas are all inner, all outer, and all inner-and-outer?
Why is it not simply said ‘contemplating the body’, but instead ‘contemplating by following the body’? How does one contemplate the body without giving rise to the notion of a body? Why is ‘diligent vigour and a single mind’ spoken of? All thirty-seven limbs of the path ought to speak of ‘a single mind’; why is ‘a single mind’ spoken of here in particular? Here, when practising the four foundations of mindfulness, all five hindrances ought to be removed; why is only ‘removing craving’ spoken of? Worldly joy can hinder the work of the path just as well; why is only ‘removing sorrow’ spoken of? The methods of contemplating the body are of all kinds—impermanence, suffering, emptiness, non-self, and so on; why now is only ‘impurity’ spoken of? If one only wishes to contemplate impurity, why must one also be mindful of the body's four postures and so on? This sort of matter is known at a glance—how is it worth asking!
Answering the Twelve Contemplations: They Break Three Wrong Practices, and from Them the Practitioner Gains a Concentrated Mind
Answer: From these twelve kinds of contemplation the practitioner gains a concentrated mind. There were previously three wrong practices—clinging to the inner, clinging to the outer, and clinging to the inner-and-outer; to break these three wrong practices, there are three right practices. Some people's attachment to the inner is great and their attachment to the outer slight, as when someone, for his own sake, is able to give up wife and children, relatives, and wealth; some people's attachment to the outer is great and their attachment to the inner slight, as when someone loses his body out of greed for wealth, or his life for the sake of desire; some people's attachment to the inner and to the outer are both great—to counteract these three one-sided attachments, three right practices are spoken of.
Furthermore, one's own body is called the inner body, and the bodies of others are called the outer body; the nine sense-fields that feel (the faculties endowed with consciousness, such as eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind) are called the inner body, and the nine sense-fields that do not feel (outer objects and other places without consciousness) are called the outer body; the five sense faculties such as the eye are called the inner body, and the five sense-objects such as form are called the outer body; in all kinds of ways like these, inner and outer are distinguished.
The Fourfold Distinction of Inner and Outer Bodies; Only by Contemplating Inner and Outer Together Is Right Concentration Gained
The practitioner first contemplates the inner body with the wisdom of impurity, impermanence, suffering, emptiness, non-self, and so on, and cannot find any fine mark in this body: he finds no mark of purity, finds no mark of permanence, finds no pleasure, finds no self, finds nothing real. The inner body having been found unfindable, he next contemplates the outer body, seeking purity, permanence, self, pleasure, and the real, and these likewise cannot be found. If he still cannot find them, he then gives rise to doubt: “When I contemplated the inner body, perhaps I was mistaken about the outer body; when I contemplated the outer body, perhaps I was mistaken about the inner body.” Now he contemplates inner and outer together at one time, and still they cannot be found. At this time the mind gains right concentration and knows that this body is impure, impermanent, suffering, empty, and without self, like a sickness, like a boil, like a sore, its nine openings oozing filth, this body a walking privy; before long it must break down, scatter, and come to an end, full of the marks of death; the many sufferings—hunger and thirst, cold and heat, whips and staves, fetters and confinement, abuse, slander, old age and sickness, and so on—constantly surround it, and it has no mastery of itself. Within it is empty and void; there is no master, nor anyone who knows, anyone who sees, anyone who acts, anyone who receives; there are only empty dharmas existing through the coming together of causes and conditions, arising of themselves and ceasing of themselves, belonging to nothing, just like grass and trees. Precisely because of this, inner and outer must be contemplated together.
The remaining meaning of inner and outer is as explained in ‘the eighteen emptinesses’.
Explaining ‘Contemplating by Following the Body’ and ‘Not Giving Rise to the Notion of a Body’: Tracing and Contemplating without Raising Idle Discourse
‘Contemplating by following the body’ means tracing the marks of the body and contemplating in accordance with them, knowing its impurity—aging, sickness, and death, festering and stinking, its joints and bones rotting, wearing away and returning to dust. It is just as with this body of mine: it is covered only by a thin skin, yet it drives people mad and deluded and gives rise to endless worries and fears. Precisely because of this, one must follow the marks of the body inner and outer in sequence, contemplating from root to branch. It is also as the Buddha taught the method of contemplating by following the body.
‘Not giving rise to the notion of a body’ means not grasping at marks of the body as one or as different and so giving rise to idle discourse. Beings give rise to all kinds of notions and thoughts about this body: some give rise to notions of purity, some to notions of impurity; some give rise to notions of anger, dwelling on the wrongs of others; some people contemplate this body thus: “What dharma, after all, is the body? Are the boundaries of the parts of the body one? Or are they different?”—one does not give rise to notions of all these kinds. Why? Because they bring no benefit at all, and on the contrary obstruct the path to nirvāṇa.
Furthermore, other ordinary people and śrāvakas can contemplate the body only by grasping the marks of the body, whereas the bodhisattva is able to contemplate the body without grasping the marks of the body.
Explaining ‘Diligent Vigour and a Single Mind’ and ‘Removing the Craving and Sorrow of the World’: Drilling the Fire-Stick for Fire, Splitting the Bamboo Through Its Joints
As for ‘diligent vigour and a single mind’: the remaining worldly affairs come easily, having been constantly habituated and constantly done from the beginningless world onward—just as parting from an ordinary acquaintance is easy but parting from a close friend is hard; parting from a close friend is easy but parting from father and son is hard; parting from father and son is easy but parting from one's own body is hard; parting from one's own body is easy but parting from one's own mind is hard. If one does not make one's own mind single and exert oneself with vigour, this cannot be done! It is like drilling wood to seek fire: one drills earnestly with a single mind, without pausing and without stopping, and only then obtains fire; therefore it is said ‘a single mind and diligent vigour’.
As for ‘removing the craving and sorrow of the world’: once craving is removed, the five hindrances are all swept away; it is like splitting a bamboo—once the first joint is split, all the other joints split open along with it. Furthermore, the practitioner leaves the five desires and goes forth to train in the path; having already given up worldly pleasure but not yet having gained the pleasure of meditative absorption, at times his mind gives rise to sorrowful thoughts, like a fish longing for water. Such is the nature of the mind: it constantly seeks pleasurable things and turns back to think of what it originally desired. Practitioners mostly give rise to these two kinds of mind, so the Buddha said ‘one should remove craving and sorrow’. To say ‘craving’ is also to say worldly joy, because the two are associated.
Why Impurity Is Contemplated First, and Why the Four Postures Are Attended to First
The reason impurity is contemplated first: the human body is fundamentally impure, but because it is covered by a thin skin, one first gives rise to the notion of purity and afterwards to the other inversions; precisely because of this, the contemplation of impurity is spoken of first.
Furthermore, beings are mostly attached to sensual pleasure and grasp at the mark of purity; anger and wrong views are not like this, so one first counteracts desire by contemplating impurity.
The reason for being mindful of the body's four postures and so on: first one must break this thief, the body; for one who has gained a single mind, whatever he does can be accomplished. Precisely because of this, one must first trace out what this body does and how it acts—coming and going, lying down and waking, sitting in meditation—contemplating what the body does, always single-minded and composed, without confusion. Contemplating in this way and looking with impurity, samādhi is easily gained.
Ānāpāna Guards Against Initial and Sustained Thought, and These Two Dharmas Are the First Gates of Ambrosia; the Contemplation of Impurity Sees the Body as Grass, Trees, Tiles, and Stones
Although the body is composed, within there are all kinds of evil initial and sustained thoughts disturbing the mind; precisely because of this, the sixteen parts of ānāpāna (the in-breath and out-breath) are spoken of to guard against initial and sustained thought. The meaning of ānāpāna is as was said earlier. When the body is composed and the mind free of confusion, then practising the contemplation of impurity is secure and firm. If one practises the contemplation of impurity first, then because the mind is wild and confused, one takes the impure for the mark of purity instead. In the Buddha-dharma, these two dharmas (the contemplation of impurity and ānāpāna) are called the first gates of ambrosia.
The contemplation of impurity means that the bodhisattva-mahāsattva contemplates this body as no different from grass, trees, tiles, and stones.
The Four Great Elements Are Like the Butcher's Four Parts of the Ox, and the Self Is Not in the Four Elements; the Granary Simile for the Thirty-Six Things
The four great elements outside this body turn into food and drink and fill out the inner body: what is hard is earth, what is moist is water, what is warm is fire, what moves is wind; these four, having entered within, are the body. Within these four parts, each is without self and without anything belonging to a self, following each its own specific mark, not following people's wishes. Suffering, emptiness, and the rest are spoken of in the same way.
As for ‘whether sitting or standing’: lying down, one becomes lax—the body does not move, and the mind too does not move; walking, the mind is scattered—the body is not still, and the mind too is not still.
To use a matter the eye can see to illustrate what cannot be seen, this simile is spoken: the ‘ox’ is the practitioner's body; the ‘butcher’ is the practitioner; the ‘knife’ is sharp wisdom; ‘taking the ox's life’ is breaking the mark of the body as one; the ‘four parts’ are the four great elements. When the butcher looks at the four parts of the ox, there is no further ox, nor is it an ox; the practitioner's contemplation of the body's four great elements is likewise. These four great elements are not called the body. Why? How could these four great elements be one and the same body? Moreover, the four great elements are the general mark and the body is the specific mark; if the outer four great elements are not called the body, it is only when they enter the body that they are provisionally named body. The self is not within the four great elements, and the four great elements are not within the self; the self is far removed from the four great elements, and only through inversion is it falsely reckoned to be the body. Using this wisdom of dispersal-emptiness to analyse the four great elements and the form derived from them, one then enters the latter three foundations of mindfulness (feeling, mind, and dharmas), and only then can one enter the path.
Again, this body, from the feet to the hair and from the hair to the feet, is wrapped all round in thin skin; thinking it over again and again, there is not a single place that is pure. Head-hair, body-hair, and so on up to the brain-membrane: briefly spoken, these are thirty-six things; broadly spoken, they are very many. The granary is the body; the farmer is the practitioner; sowing grain in the field is the causes and conditions of the practitioner's bodily karma; the fruit that forms and is gathered into the granary is the body the practitioner obtains when his causes and conditions ripen. Rice, sesame, millet, foxtail millet, and the rest are the various impurities in the body. When the farmer opens the granary, he knows the various differences of sesame, millet, wheat, and beans; this is the practitioner's contemplation of impurity—opening the granary of this body with the eye of wisdom and looking, he knows that this body is filled with impurity and will in the end fall to ruin, whether harmed by others or dying of itself. In this body there is only excrement and urine, impurity, all kinds of foul discharges, and so on.
Two Kinds of Impurity, the Already-Decayed and the Not-Yet-Decayed; the Corpse's Decay Plainly Seen
Having contemplated the impurity of the inner body, one now contemplates the decay of the outer body; therefore two kinds of impurity are spoken of: the first is the already-decayed, the second the not-yet-decayed. First one contemplates one's own body in its state not yet broken down, still with consciousness; if a person's fetters are thin and his faculties keen, he at once gives rise to revulsion; a person of dull faculties and thick fetters contemplates the already-decayed dead person, fearful and loathsome.
If a person has been dead from one day to five days, his kin are still keeping watch; at this time the birds and beasts have not yet come to eat, and the corpse is livid and bruised, swollen and bloated, pus and blood flowing out, the belly burst open, the five organs festering, the excrement and urine foul—extremely loathsome and repulsive. The practitioner reflects: “This physical body was formerly so lovely—coming and going, speaking, bewitching and alluring, with a thousand charming poses, confusing people's feelings, loved by those given to lust; looking at it now, where is that lovely colour? As the Buddha said, it is truly a dharma of illusion and conjuration, merely deceiving eyes that lack wisdom!” Now that the truth of this has been laid bare, the practitioner then reflects: “My body and that corpse are equal and without difference; neither has yet escaped this nature—why should I love myself and also be attached to others? And why should I value myself and despise others?” Having contemplated in this way, the mind becomes tamed and can be used to seek the path, and is able to remove the craving and sorrow of the world.
Reflecting further: when this corpse has just died, birds and beasts that see it think it is not a dead person and dare not approach; precisely because of this, it is said, “After six or seven days, when the relatives have gone away, crows, vultures, jackals, and their like come vying to devour it.” When the skin and flesh are gone, it changes day by day; precisely because of this, it is said, “only a skeleton remains.” Seeing this, one gives rise all the more to a mind of revulsion and renunciation, reflecting: “This heart, liver, skin, and flesh in truth have no self; only because this body has gathered the causes and conditions of wrongdoing and merit does it undergo immeasurable suffering!” At once he again reflects to himself: “Before long this body of mine will in the end become like this; it has not yet escaped this nature.” At times the practitioner sees a skeleton on the ground, soaked by the rain, baked by the sun and blown by the wind, with only white bones left; at times he sees the bones of long years, sinews severed and joints loosened, scattered in every direction, their colour like a dove's; at times they are rotted and crumbled, the same colour as the earth.
The Corpse Matched to the Four Contemplations of Impurity, Impermanence, Non-Self, and Suffering; with the Four Noble Practices Inner and Outer Are Contemplated Together
First contemplating the thirty-six things, and the corpse swollen and bloated from one day to five days: this is the contemplation of impurity. The birds and beasts coming to eat, and so on up to becoming the same colour as the earth: this is the contemplation of impermanence. Seeking within this for a self or for what belongs to a self, neither can be found, because, as was said earlier, ‘it arises from causes and conditions and has no mastery of itself’: this is the contemplation of non-self. Contemplating that the marks of the body are thus, with not one thing to delight in; and that if someone is attached to it, he then gives rise to sorrow and suffering: this is called the contemplation of suffering.
Using these four noble practices (impurity, impermanence, non-self, and suffering) to contemplate the outer body, one knows for oneself that one's own body is also thus, and afterwards contemplates inner and outer together.
Whipping the Mind into Submission Can Remove Craving and Sorrow; the Two Thieves, Craving and Sorrow, and the Falseness of Worldly Pleasure
If the mind is scattered, one should be mindful of the suffering of old age, sickness, and death and of the three evil paths, of the impermanence of body and life, and that the Buddha-dharma will perish; using these to whip one's own mind into submission, one binds it back again to the contemplation of impurity: this is called ‘diligent vigour’. Because of a single mind and diligent vigour, one is able to remove craving and sorrow.
Craving and sorrow, these two thieves, rob me of the Dharma-treasure; the practitioner reflects thus: “This body is impermanent, impure, and loathsome; why do beings such as these still crave this body and raise all kinds of causes and conditions for committing wrongs?” Having reflected in this way, he knows that in this body there are the five inner faculties and outside there are the five desires, and from the coming together of the two, the inverted pleasure of the world arises! The human mind seeks pleasure, and from the very beginning has never had a time of rest. One should contemplate whether this pleasure is real or empty. Even the body, firm as it is, must still scatter and perish—how much more this pleasure!
Sexual Desire Robs the Life of Wisdom; Because the Mind Arises and Ceases Moment by Moment, It Is Impermanent and Without Self
This pleasure, too, has no place where it abides: the future has not yet come, the past has already perished, the present does not stay—moment by moment it is perishing; only because suffering is screened off is it called pleasure, and there is no real pleasure! It is like food and drink: only because the suffering of hunger and thirst is removed are they taken for pleasure for a while, and when one goes past the measure, suffering arises again, as was said earlier in ‘refuting pleasure’. It can be known that the pleasures of the world all arise from causes and conditions of suffering and are also able to produce the fruit of suffering; they deceive people for a moment, but the suffering afterwards is immeasurable. It is like fine food mixed with poison: though the food is fragrant and delicious, the poison harms people; the pleasure of the world is likewise.
Because the poisons of sexual desire, the afflictions, and so on rob one of the life of wisdom, the mind becomes wild and deluded, abandoning benefit and taking up loss—who is it that experiences this pleasure? Only mind-consciousness. When this mind is closely contemplated, it arises and ceases moment by moment; only because it continues without break can its mark be taken, like waves of water or the flame of a lamp. The mind that experiences suffering is not the mind that experiences pleasure; the mind that experiences pleasure is not the mind that experiences suffering; the mind that experiences what is neither suffering nor pleasure is not the mind that experiences suffering or pleasure; the marks of the mind at each time are each different; precisely because of this, the mind is impermanent.
Because it is impermanent, it has no mastery; because it has no mastery, it is without self. Perception, construction, recollection, and the rest are likewise.
The marks, inner and outer, of the remaining three foundations of mindfulness (feeling, mind, and dharmas) are as was said earlier.
The Four Noble Practices Break the Four Inversions; Matched to the Four Truths, One Enters the Stage of Warmth and the Stage of the Summit
Practising these four noble practices breaks the four inversions (purity, pleasure, permanence, and self); because the four inversions are broken, the gate of the real mark is opened; once the gate of the real mark is opened, one is ashamed of what one had habitually practised before. It is like someone who eats something impure in the night; when others point out that it was not a good thing, he feels ashamed on account of it.
Contemplating the impurity, impermanence, and so on of these four dharmas is called the truth of suffering; this suffering comes from craving and the other afflictions—this is the truth of origination; craving and the other afflictions being cut off—this is the truth of cessation; the means of cutting off craving and the other afflictions—this is the truth of the path.
Contemplating the four truths in this way, one deeply believes in the path to nirvāṇa, and the mind dwells in happiness, as though already uncontaminated; this is called ‘the stage of warmth’. It is like someone drilling for fire who already has warmth: he surely expects to obtain fire.
Having believed in this Dharma, the mind loves and delights in the Buddha, this Dharma being just as the Buddha said, as when someone takes good medicine and his illness is cured, he then knows the skill of the physician; all those who have taken the medicine and been cured are foremost among humans—this is faith in the Saṅgha; in this way one believes in the Three Jewels. The stage of warmth increases vigour, and because wrongdoing and merit are evenly balanced, it is called ‘the stage of the summit’. It is like someone climbing a mountain who has reached the summit: the ways down on either side are equal. From the summit to acceptance, right up to arhatship, is the path on one side; from warmth to the summit is the path on the other side.
The Fruit of the Śrāvakas and What the Bodhisattva Does Not Share with Them: Not Forgetting the Original Vow, Compliant Acceptance and the Acceptance of the Non-Arising of Dharmas
In the Dharma of the śrāvakas, contemplating the four foundations of mindfulness, the fruit obtained is just this.
In the Dharma of the bodhisattva, within this contemplation one does not forget the original vow and does not abandon great compassion; first one tames the ground of the mind with emptiness that cannot be found, and dwells in this ground of the mind; although there are still afflictions, the mind always does not fall; it is like someone who, though he has not yet killed the thief, has bound and confined him in one place.
The bodhisattva's stage of the summit is as was said earlier under ‘the dharma-position’.
Acceptance and the highest worldly dharma are the bodhisattva's compliant acceptance of dharmas.
The path of the srota-āpanna, up to the path of the arhat and the pratyekabuddha, is the bodhisattva's acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas. As the Buddha himself says in a later chapter: “The wisdom or the realisation of the srota-āpanna is all the bodhisattva's acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas.”
The Four Foundations of Mindfulness, the Four Right Efforts, and the Four Bases of Supernormal Power: The Division of Labour among Wisdom, Vigour, and Concentration; Why They Are Named Foundations of Mindfulness
The four right efforts and the four bases of supernormal power, although each has its own separate rank, are all within the four foundations of mindfulness. Because wisdom predominates, they are called ‘the four foundations of mindfulness’; because vigour predominates, they are called ‘the four right efforts’; because concentration predominates, they are called ‘the four bases of supernormal power’.
Question: If that is so, why are they not called ‘foundations of knowledge’ but ‘foundations of mindfulness’? Answer: When one first habitually practises, there is not yet time for wisdom; mindfulness is the first gate—one is constantly mindful of its object—and because this wisdom arises following mindfulness, they are named with ‘mindfulness’. The real substance of the four foundations of mindfulness is wisdom. Why? Contemplating the inner and outer body is wisdom; mindfulness holds wisdom in the object and does not let it scatter, so they are called ‘foundations of mindfulness’.
Explaining the Names Right Effort and Bases of Supernormal Power; Distinguishing Faculties, Powers, Path, and Awakening
Because they run counter to the ninety-six kinds of wrong practice in seeking the path, they are called ‘right efforts’. Those of the outside paths and others give up the five desires and torment their own bodies, yet they are unable to give up what is evil and unwholesome, and also unable to accumulate wholesome dharmas. The Buddha has two dharmas for cutting off what is evil and unwholesome: what has already come is removed, and what has not yet come is guarded against so that it does not arise; wholesome dharmas are likewise of two kinds: wholesome dharmas not yet arisen are made to arise, and wholesome dharmas already arisen are made to increase—these are called ‘right efforts’.
The fire of wisdom, obtaining the wind of right effort, burns everything. If right effort goes too far, the mind becomes scattered and the fire of wisdom on the contrary grows weak; it is like a fire that obtains wind: if the wind is too strong, the fire sometimes on the contrary goes out or grows faint and cannot burn or give light. Therefore concentration must be used to check the excessive wind of vigour, and only then can concentration be gained. Concentration is of four kinds: the concentration of desire, the concentration of vigour, the concentration of mind, and the concentration of reflection. Checking the excessive wisdom in the four foundations of mindfulness, at this time the path of concentration and wisdom, having obtained vigour, attains all that it wishes as it wishes; and because afterwards one attains one's wish and the matter is accomplished, they are called ‘bases of supernormal power’. ‘Base’ means the causes and conditions of attaining one's wish; it is also called ‘part’.
These twelve dharmas (the four foundations of mindfulness, the four right efforts, and the four bases of supernormal power), in people of dull faculties, are called ‘faculties’, like a tree that has roots but does not yet have strength; in people of keen faculties they are called ‘powers’—the matter is plain and clear, and they can swiftly accomplish something, like a sharp knife cutting through things, so they are said to have power. When the matter is not yet accomplished, they are called ‘path’; when the matter is accomplished, reflecting and practising, they are called ‘awakening’.
The discussion of the thirty-seven limbs of the path is as was said earlier.
Why One Who Practises the Thirty-Seven Limbs Does Not Grasp Nirvāṇa: The Buddhas of the Ten Directions Stroke His Head and Exhort Him; the Dharmas Are as Said Before, Gathered into Nothing to Be Attained
Question: If the bodhisattva practises these thirty-seven limbs of the path, why does he not grasp nirvāṇa? Answer: Because his original vow is firm; because the mind of great compassion has entered deeply; because he knows the real mark of all dharmas clearly and distinctly; because the Buddhas of the ten directions protect and keep him in mind. As a sūtra says: “When the bodhisattva reaches the seventh abode-stage, outwardly he contemplates all dharmas as empty and inwardly he contemplates non-self; like a man who in a dream binds a raft to cross a river, and midstream wakes up, and reflects thus: ‘I have been needlessly wearing myself out; there is no river and no raft—what is it I am crossing?’ The bodhisattva at that time is likewise; his mind then regrets and turns away: ‘What is it I am crossing? What is it I am extinguishing?’ He wishes only to extinguish that inverted mind for himself. At this time the Buddhas of the ten directions stretch out their hands and stroke his head: ‘Excellent! Child of the Buddha! Do not give rise to a mind of regret! Remember your original vow! Although you know this, beings have not yet awakened; you should use this dharma of emptiness to teach and transform beings. What you have attained is only a single gate; the Buddhas' immeasurable bodies, immeasurable voices, immeasurable Dharma-gates, all wisdom, and so on—none of these have you yet attained. Because you contemplate all dharmas as empty, you cling to this nirvāṇa; within the emptiness of all dharmas there is no place that can be extinguished, and no place that can be clung to; if extinction were truly real, you would long since have been extinguished. You have not yet fulfilled the six perfections, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas; you should fulfil these dharmas and sit at the seat of awakening, as is the Dharma of all Buddhas.’”
Furthermore, the three samādhi, the eleven knowledges, the three uncontaminated faculties, the samādhi with initial and sustained thought, the ten recollections, the four meditations, the four immeasurable minds, the four formless absorptions, the eight liberations, and the nine successive absorptions are as was said earlier.
Furthermore, the Buddha's ten powers, four fearlessnesses, four unobstructed knowledges, and eighteen unshared dharmas are as was said in the very first chapter.
All these dharmas, in the end, are (accomplished) through there being nothing to be attained. Because they are joined with the ultimate emptiness of prajñāpāramitā, it is called ‘removing the craving and sorrow of the world, because they cannot be found’.
四念處品之一:四念處為道品之首、大乘所攝,身念處十二觀何以先修不淨、云何觀身而不生身覺
在問什麼
這一分承著上一分的摩訶衍往下說,佛一開口便把四念處判入大乘——「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍,所謂四念處」。四念處本是三十七道品的第一組,聲聞、緣覺同修此法;如今卻列為菩薩摩訶薩的摩訶衍,這裡就藏著第一重追問:一個共二乘的觀法,憑什麼能是大乘?答案的鑰匙,在經文貫穿始終的那一句「以不可得故」——身、受、心、法歷歷可觀,卻以畢竟空冠之,這一冠,便把自了之觀改寫成了菩薩之道。
第二重追問落在身念處的鋪陳上。經說四念處各有內、外、內外三重觀,四處合成十二觀;但真正逐一展開的只有身念處——從行住坐臥、四威儀細行,到入出息、觀四大、三十六物不淨,再到死屍九觀;受、心、法三處則「如先說」一句帶過。於是論主一連設了十個問:何以只說十二觀?何等是內、何等是外、既觀內外何以又別說內外?何以不說「觀身」而說「循身觀」?云何觀身而不生身覺?何以獨言「一心」?何以獨言「除貪」、「除憂」?何以獨言「不淨」?——這一串問,把整分要解的關節都挑了出來。
第三重追問最要緊:修這十二觀、乃至三十七品,聲聞得的是煖、頂、忍法直到阿羅漢,菩薩修同一套法,果卻不同——這一分要回答的,正是在不動搖畢竟空、共修同一觀門的前提下,菩薩之四念處何以不落聲聞的自了,而成不取涅槃、迴向菩提的無生法忍。
逐段解明
第一,四處十二觀的開與合,是這一分的骨架。四念處各以內、外、內外三重觀成十二,而唯獨身念處被鋪成完整的樣板,受、心、法三處只以「餘三念處內外相如先說」略過。論主答十二觀之設,是為破先來的三種邪行——有人著內情多、有人著外情多、有人著內外情都多,破這三種偏著,故立內、外、內外三種正行,「行者從此得定心」。內外的界說又有四重:自身為內、他身為外;能受之九入為內、不受之九入為外;眼等五情為內、色等五塵為外。先觀內身求淨常我樂實而不得,再觀外身亦不得,內外一時俱觀仍不可得,這時「心得正定」,知身如病如癰如瘡、九孔流穢、內空無主。十二觀不是十二件事,是同一畢竟空觀在內外兩端、能所之間的層層逼近。
第二,「循身觀」與「不生身覺」,分判了菩薩觀身與凡夫觀身的界線。不說「觀身」而說「循身觀」,是要尋著身相隨順觀察、從本至末,知其不淨衰壞、摩滅歸土;「不生身覺」則是「不取身一異相而生戲論」——眾生於身中或起淨覺、或起不淨覺、或起瞋覺念他過罪、或計較身分是一是異,這些覺想無所利益、反妨涅槃道,故一概不生。論主一句點破關鍵:其餘凡夫、聲聞取身相才能觀身,「菩薩不取身相而能觀身」。觀而不取相,正是這一分「以不可得故」在身念處上的落腳。
第三,「一心勤精進」與「除世間貪憂」,是這觀門的兩根柱子。世事的巧便從無始串習,離身易而離心難,若不專一勤精進便辦不成,論以鑽木求火為喻——「一心勤精進」,不休不息才得火。「除世間貪憂」則是貪一除而五蓋盡去,論以破竹為喻:初節既破、餘節皆去;而所以並言貪憂,是因出家人捨了世樂、未得定樂,心生憂念如魚戀水,故佛連貪帶憂一併說除。
第四,何以於種種觀門中先說不淨,論主答得明白:人身本不淨,只因薄皮覆蓋先生淨相,眾生又多著貪欲取淨相,故先治貪欲、先觀不淨、先破身賊。而不淨觀不能孤起——身雖安詳,內有惡覺觀擾心,故先以安那般那十六分防覺觀,心無錯亂然後行不淨觀才安隱牢固;若顛倒其序,狂心錯亂反把不淨作淨。這兩法在佛法中叫作「甘露初門」。不淨觀成就時,「觀身如草木瓦石無異」,四大入身、各無我我所,我不在四大中、四大不在我中,只是顛倒妄計為身。
第五,死屍九觀與三十六物,是十二觀裡最觸目的一段,卻各有所配。論主收束道:初觀三十六物、死屍膖脹一日至五日,是不淨觀;鳥獸來食乃至與土同色,是無常觀;於中求我我所不可得,是非我觀;觀身無一可樂、著則生憂,是苦觀。四聖行既觀外身、又自知己身如是,然後內外俱觀。這一配,把可畏可惡的死屍相,收進了不淨、無常、非我、苦的四觀之中——不是為駭人,是要以眼可見之壞,況所不見之空。
第六,這一分的歸結,落在聲聞與菩薩的分野上,也正是三十七品互攝的過渡。觀四法破四顛倒,開實相門,配苦集滅道四諦,信涅槃道而心住快樂似如無漏,是為「煖法」;信三寶、罪福停等,是為頂法;再至忍、至阿羅漢辟支佛——這是聲聞所得的果報。菩薩則於同一觀中「不忘本願,不捨大悲」,先用不可得空調伏心地,雖有煩惱心常不墮;其忍法、世間第一法即柔順法忍,其須陀洹乃至辟支佛道即「須陀洹道,乃至阿羅漢、辟支佛道,即是菩薩無生法忍」。四正勤、四如意足雖各別位,皆在四念處中——「慧多故,名『四念處』;精進多故,名『四正勤』;定多故,名『四如意足』」,此即道品之互攝。至於修三十七品何以不取涅槃,論主答以「本願牢故,大悲心深入故」,並以十方佛伸手摩頭、勸菩薩莫滅倒心、當以空法教化眾生為喻。末後三三昧、十一智乃至十八不共法皆「如先說」帶過,全分收於一句——「是諸法後皆用無所得故」。道品共二乘,而無所得與本願,正是它成其為大乘的兩處不共。
逐觀補釋:三喻、二種不淨、死屍九觀
前一段已把身念處十二觀的開合、循身觀與不生身覺說過;這裡把經與論裡三個觸目的譬喻、以及死屍九觀的逐階,補足細節,好讓這條觀身之路首尾完整。
先看三喻。觀入出息時,經以旋師執繩為喻——「入息長時知入息長,出息長時知出息長;入息短時知入息短,出息短時知出息短」,就像轉繩的師傅或其弟子,「繩長知長,繩短知短」,息之長短歷歷分明而心不隨之奔逸,這正是安那般那十六分防覺觀的下手處。觀四大時,經以屠牛師為喻,論主更把喻體一一拆開:牛是行者身、屠兒是行者、刀是利智慧、奪牛之命即破身是一的相、四分即四大——屠夫把牛分作四分之後,眼前但見四分、更無別牛,也不見有一個叫「牛」的東西;行者以利智觀身,但見地水火風四大、更無別身,也不見有一個「我身」。這一喻要教的,正是「四大不名為身」、「我不在四大中,四大不在我中」——身只是四大入內的假名。觀三十六物時,經以田夫穀倉為喻,論主亦拆之:穀倉是身、農夫是行者、田種穀是行者的身業因緣、結實入倉是行者因緣熟而得身——明眼農夫一開倉便分別麻黍稻粟麥豆種種各異,行者以慧眼開這身倉,便知髮毛爪齒乃至腦膜三十六物種種不淨充滿、必當敗壞。三喻各治一觀——繩喻治息、牛喻治四大上的我執、倉喻治身上的淨執——而同教一事:身無實我,唯是因緣假合。
再看二種不淨。論主分不淨為二:「一者、已壞,二者、未壞」。先觀自身未壞而有心識者,結使薄、根性利的人即時生厭;根鈍結厚者則須觀已壞的死人,以其可畏可惡而奪其淨執。這是不淨觀的兩重下手,隨根之利鈍而異其所觀之境,不是兩種法,是同一治貪之觀在利鈍二根上的權巧。
末看死屍九觀的逐階。經歷數死屍的九個變壞之相,階階自念「我身如是相、如是法,未脫此法」:一者、一日至五日膖脹青瘀、膿血流出、腹裂臟爛,論主補其情境——親里猶守、禽獸未食,行者對此自省「好色安在」,知先前妖蠱惑人的美色,只是「誑無智之眼」的幻法;二者、六七日禽獸爭食;三者、禽獸食已而不淨爛臭;四者、骨鎖上血肉塗染、筋骨相連;五者、血肉已離、筋骨相連;六者、骨鎖已散在地;七者、諸骨異處,腳骨、膞髀、腰肋、脊手、項骨、髑髏各各散在別處;八者、歲久風吹日曝、色白如貝;九者、久骨筋斷節解、其色如鴿,乃至腐朽而與土同色。這九階不是為駭人,論主收之為四觀——初觀三十六物與膖脹五日是不淨觀、鳥獸食至與土同色是無常觀、於中求我我所不可得是非我觀、觀身無一可樂是苦觀——以眼可見之壞,況所不見之空。
卷末法義補釋:樂受、心無常、念處與智處、正勤與定
這一單元卷末,在論釋煖頂諸法之外,尚有一段完整的義理論述,前段未及,補之於下。
先說樂受本質與心無常。論主析世間樂本無實——「此樂亦無住處,未來未有,過去已滅,現在不住,念念皆滅」,只因遮去了苦才假名為樂。以飲食為喻:飲食「除飢渴苦故,暫以為樂,過度則復生苦」,可見樂從苦的因緣生、亦還生苦的果報。又以美食雜毒為喻:「食雖香美,毒則害人」,世間樂亦如是,誑人於須臾而後苦無量。至於那能受樂的心,論主教其念念生滅——「受苦心非樂心,受樂心非苦心,受不苦不樂心非苦樂心,時相各異」,故心無常;如「水波、燈焰」,正因相續不斷才可取其相,其實剎那不住。無常故不自在、不自在故無我,想、思、憶念也都如是。論主先立此析,是要拔那盤踞觀行的兩個賊——「貪、憂二賊,劫我法寶」:行者念此身無常不淨可惡,何故還貪著它、起種種造罪的因緣?既知內有五情、外有五欲,二者和合才生出世間顛倒之樂,便不被這假樂所劫。而所以說樂能奪人,是因婬欲等煩惱之毒奪去了智慧之命,人一狂惑便捨利取衰;究其實,受樂的不過是那念念生滅的心識罷了。看破這一層,樂受的甜、心念的常、身命的實,三處假相一時鬆動,觀身才不至於觀到中途又被貪憂牽回。這也正接回前段「除世間貪憂」的用功:貪一除則五蓋盡去,如破竹初節既破、餘節皆隨;而所以並言貪、憂,是因出家人捨了世樂、未得定樂,心易生憂如魚戀水,故佛連貪帶憂一併說除。析樂受、析心無常,便是替這一除貪憂鋪下義理的地基——不見樂之虛、心之無常,貪憂便無從斷根。
次說夜食不淨喻。行四聖行破淨、樂、常、我四種顛倒,便開實相門而愧其本所串習——論主以夜食為喻:「譬人夜食不淨,他了知非,羞愧其事」,人在暗中誤食不淨之物,經人指明方才羞愧;行者破顛倒、見實相之後,回看昔日所愛著的身,本是不淨,也如是自愧。
再說念處與智處。有人問:四念處實體既是智慧,何以不名「智處」而名「念處」。論主答:初習行時還來不及有智,「念為初門,常念其事」,智慧是隨著念而起的,故以念為名;且「念持智慧在緣中,不令散亂」,正是「處」字的落腳——念是把智慧繫定於所緣的那一著,故名念處。這一問答不可略過,它點出了念與慧的先後:念在前而攝、慧在後而觀,四念處以念立名而以慧為體。
末說正勤與定。正勤所以名「正」,是「與九十六種邪行求道相違」——外道捨五欲、自苦其身,卻不能捨惡不善、不能集諸善法;佛則有斷惡(已來者除、未來者防其不生)與生善(未生令生、已生令長)各二法,故名正勤。論主又以火風為喻,校量精進的過與不及——「智慧火得正勤風,無所不燒」,然而「正勤若過,心則散亂,智火微弱」,如火得風、過度反而或滅或微,故須以定來制那過度的精進之風;定有四種:欲定、精進定、心定、思惟定。末後又判這十二法(四念處、四正勤、四如意足)的位次——在鈍根人中名「根」,如樹有根而未有力;在利根人中名「力」,如利刀截物、能疾有所辦。事未辦時名「道」,事辦而思惟修行時名「覺」。同是這十二法,隨根之利鈍、事之辦否,而有根、力、道、覺的異名。
不要讀錯
不要把「不生身覺」讀成不觀身、或觀身成空而一無所知。不生身覺,是不取身一異相而起戲論,不是不觀;論明說菩薩「不取身相而能觀身」——觀行歷歷,只是不落取相。把它讀成閉眼不觀,就把般若的觀身讀成了斷滅。
不要把「初觀不淨」讀成不淨是究竟、或以不淨相為實。不淨觀只是甘露初門,是對治貪欲取淨相的方便;死屍九觀最終收於無常、非我、苦,再收於「以不可得故」的畢竟空。若停在不淨相上當作實有可厭之境,便錯把初門當作了終地。
不要把「除世間貪憂」讀成只除貪、憂兩項煩惱。貪除則五蓋盡去,如破竹初節、餘節皆隨;並言貪憂,是因捨世樂、未得定樂之際憂念易起,貪即世間喜之相應。只在事相上數落一兩個煩惱,就失了「初節既破,餘節皆去」的分量。
不要把菩薩四念處讀成與聲聞同一條路、同一個果。所修的十二觀是同一套,聲聞卻只到煖頂忍乃至阿羅漢,菩薩則以不可得空加本願大悲,成柔順忍與無生法忍,修道品而不取涅槃。混同二者,就抹去了這一分特意分判的聲聞、菩薩之界。
也不要把「以不可得故」讀成廢棄觀行、消極不修。這一句正是在身受心法一一觀得歷歷之時冠上去的——是觀而不著,不是不觀。以畢竟空作懶修的藉口,恰是把這一分讀反了。
修行作用
這一分可作觀身的一把尺。觀身時可問:我是尋隨觀察而不取身相,還是又悄悄計較起身是一、是異,落回了「身覺」的戲論?修不淨、九想時可問:我是把它當作對治貪著的初門、終要收歸不可得,還是停在可厭之相上,把方便錯認成了究竟?
除煩惱時這把尺也用得上:我除貪憂,是像破竹初節、五蓋隨去,還是只在一兩件事相上計較?用功時可問:我這一分勤精進,是鑽木求火般不休不息、一心不亂,還是散慢無力?最要緊的一問留給發心:我修這四念處、乃至三十七品,是只求自身出離的煖頂忍,還是不忘本願、不捨大悲,觀身受心法而不取涅槃、迴向菩提?若這幾問答得住,便是在畢竟空裡觀身不著、在共二乘的觀門上行不共的悲願——這正是四念處成其為摩訶衍在起步處的樣子。
承衍
後來讀這一分的古德,最常著力的是內外身的界說與道品體系的鋪列:有就自身、他身以及五情、五塵之分,細辨內身外身之所指,與論主「自身名內身,他身名外身」一路相發;也有把三十七道品的門數逐一辨列,旁及十力、四無所畏、三念處等法數的相攝,替讀者理出這一長串道品的骨架;又有以九相與十想相參,辨不淨觀在開與合之間的出入。也有古德留意到本品文分兩段——前為四念處、後為道品與字門——而統貫處理、其疏無異。這些讀法各有脈絡,此處只誌其取徑、不判其高下。
把這些讀法收回本單元,最值得保留的不是一張更細的科判,而是這一分對道品的般若改寫。四念處本是三十七品之首、共聲聞緣覺同修;而經一冠「以不可得故」、繫以「不忘本願,不捨大悲」,同一套身念處十二觀,在聲聞是煖頂忍至阿羅漢的自了,在菩薩便成了不取涅槃的無生法忍。身受心法照觀不廢,而畢竟空與悲願始終是那條不斷的線。這一分把「四念處」三字,從一條共二乘的舊路,還原成了一道能載人至佛地的大乘首門。
The Four Foundations of Mindfulness, Part One: The Four Foundations of Mindfulness Stand First among the Limbs of the Path and Are Embraced by the Great Vehicle; Why the Twelve Contemplations of the Foundation of Mindfulness of the Body First Cultivate Impurity; How One Contemplates the Body without Giving Rise to Body-Notions
What Is Being Asked
This section carries on from the Mahāyāna of the previous section, and the moment the Buddha opens his mouth he assigns the four foundations of mindfulness to the Great Vehicle—「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍,所謂四念處」 tr. "the Mahāyāna of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is, namely, the four foundations of mindfulness". The four foundations of mindfulness were originally the first group of the thirty-seven limbs of the path, a dharma cultivated alike by śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas; now, however, they are listed as the Mahāyāna of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva, and here lies hidden the first question to be pressed: how can a contemplation shared with the two vehicles be the Great Vehicle? The key to the answer lies in the phrase that runs through the sūtra text from beginning to end, 「以不可得故」 tr. "because it is unfindable"—body, feeling, mind, and dharmas can be contemplated distinctly, one by one, yet they are crowned with ultimate emptiness, and this one crowning rewrites a contemplation for concluding one’s own liberation into the path of the bodhisattva.
The second question pressed falls on the laying-out of the foundation of mindfulness of the body. The sūtra says that each of the four foundations of mindfulness has a threefold contemplation—inner, outer, and inner-and-outer—and that the four foundations together make twelve contemplations; but the only one actually unfolded item by item is the foundation of mindfulness of the body—from walking, standing, sitting, and lying down and the fine conduct of the four postures, to in- and out-breathing, the contemplation of the four great elements, and the impurity of the thirty-six things, and on to the nine contemplations of the corpse; the three foundations of feeling, mind, and dharmas are passed over with the single phrase “as said before.” And so the treatise-author sets ten questions in a row: why speak only of twelve contemplations? What is inner, what is outer, and, having contemplated inner and outer, why speak separately of inner-and-outer? Why not say “contemplating the body” but “contemplating the body by following it along”? How does one contemplate the body without giving rise to body-notions? Why say only “with one mind”? Why say only “removing covetousness” and “removing grief”? Why say only “impure”?—this string of questions picks out all the joints that this whole section has to explain.
The third question pressed is the most important: in cultivating these twelve contemplations, and even the thirty-seven limbs, what the śrāvaka attains is the dharmas of heat, summit, and acceptance, on up to arhatship; the bodhisattva cultivates the same set of dharmas, yet the fruit is different—what this section must answer is precisely this: on the premise of not wavering from ultimate emptiness and of cultivating in common the same gate of contemplation, why the bodhisattva’s four foundations of mindfulness do not fall into the śrāvaka’s concluding of his own liberation, but become the acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas that does not take nirvāṇa and dedicates itself toward awakening.
Passage by Passage
First, the opening-out and gathering-in of the four foundations and twelve contemplations is the skeleton of this section. Each of the four foundations of mindfulness makes up twelve through the threefold contemplation of inner, outer, and inner-and-outer, yet only the foundation of mindfulness of the body is laid out as a complete model, while the three foundations of feeling, mind, and dharmas are passed over with “as for the remaining three foundations of mindfulness, the marks of inner and outer are as said before.” The treatise-author answers that the twelve contemplations are set up to break three kinds of wrong practice that were there beforehand—some people are attached mostly to inner faculties, some mostly to outer ones, some to both inner and outer alike; to break these three one-sided attachments, three kinds of right practice are set up—inner, outer, and inner-and-outer—and “from this the practitioner attains a concentrated mind.” The definition of inner and outer further has four layers: one’s own body is inner and another’s body is outer; the nine sense-fields that are received are inner and the nine sense-fields not received are outer; the five faculties such as the eye are inner and the five sense-objects such as form are outer. First one contemplates the inner body seeking purity, permanence, self, and bliss, and does not find them; then one contemplates the outer body and again does not find them; contemplating inner and outer together at one time, still they cannot be found—at this point 「心得正定」 tr. "the mind attains right concentration", and one knows the body to be like a sickness, like an abscess, like a sore, its nine openings flowing with filth, empty within and without an owner. The twelve contemplations are not twelve separate things; they are one and the same contemplation of ultimate emptiness closing in, layer by layer, at the two ends of inner and outer and between subject and object.
Second, “contemplating the body by following it along” and “not giving rise to body-notions” draw the line between the bodhisattva’s contemplation of the body and the ordinary person’s. Not saying “contemplating the body” but “contemplating the body by following it along” means tracing the marks of the body and observing in accord with them, from root to branch, knowing it to be impure, declining and decaying, worn away and returning to earth; “not giving rise to body-notions” is 「不取身一異相而生戲論」 tr. "not taking the marks of the body as one or as different and so giving rise to idle discourse"—beings, within the body, give rise now to notions of purity, now to notions of impurity, now to notions of anger that dwell on others’ faults and offences, or reckon whether the parts of the body are one or different; these notions and thoughts bring no benefit and on the contrary obstruct the path of nirvāṇa, so none of them is given rise to. The treatise-author lays bare the key in a single sentence: other ordinary people and śrāvakas can contemplate the body only by taking its marks, but 「菩薩不取身相而能觀身」 tr. "the bodhisattva does not take the marks of the body and yet is able to contemplate the body". Contemplating without taking marks is exactly where this section’s “because it is unfindable” comes to rest in the foundation of mindfulness of the body.
Third, “with one mind, diligent and vigorous” and “removing worldly covetousness and grief” are the two pillars of this gate of contemplation. Skill in worldly affairs has been habituated from beginningless time; leaving the body is easy and leaving the mind is hard, and without single-minded diligent vigour it cannot be accomplished; the treatise takes drilling wood for fire as its simile—「一心勤精進」 tr. "with one mind, diligent and vigorous", ceaseless and unresting, and only then is fire obtained. “Removing worldly covetousness and grief” means that once covetousness is removed the five hindrances all go; the treatise takes splitting bamboo as its simile: once the first node is split, the remaining nodes all go; and the reason covetousness and grief are spoken of together is that those who have left home have given up worldly pleasure but have not yet attained the pleasure of concentration, and their minds give rise to thoughts of grief like a fish longing for water, so the Buddha speaks of removing covetousness together with grief.
Fourth, as to why impurity is spoken of first among the many gates of contemplation, the treatise-author answers plainly: the human body is by nature impure, and only because it is covered by a thin skin does the mark of purity arise first; beings, moreover, are mostly attached to desire and take the mark of purity, so desire is treated first, impurity contemplated first, the body-thief broken first. And the contemplation of impurity cannot arise on its own—though the body be calm, within there are evil initial and sustained thought disturbing the mind, so one first guards against initial and sustained thought with the sixteen parts of ānāpāna; once the mind is free of confusion, the practice of the contemplation of impurity is then secure and firm; if the order is inverted, the crazed mind in its confusion instead takes the impure for the pure. In the Buddhadharma these two dharmas are called 「甘露初門」 tr. "the first gate to the ambrosia". When the contemplation of impurity is accomplished, 「觀身如草木瓦石無異」 tr. "one contemplates the body as no different from grass, trees, tiles, and stones"; the four great elements enter to form the body, each without I or mine; the self is not in the four great elements, and the four great elements are not in the self—only by inversion is it falsely reckoned to be a body.
Fifth, the nine contemplations of the corpse and the thirty-six things are the most startling passage among the twelve contemplations, yet each has its assignment. The treatise-author gathers it up: first contemplating the thirty-six things and the corpse swollen and bloated from the first to the fifth day is the contemplation of impurity; birds and beasts coming to eat it, on to its becoming the same colour as the earth, is the contemplation of impermanence; seeking I and mine within it and not finding them is the contemplation of non-self; contemplating that there is nothing in the body to delight in, and that attachment gives rise to grief, is the contemplation of suffering. Having contemplated the outer body with the four noble modes of practice, one also knows for oneself that one’s own body is thus, and then contemplates inner and outer together. This assignment gathers the fearful and loathsome marks of the corpse into the four contemplations of impurity, impermanence, non-self, and suffering—not to horrify, but to use the decay that the eye can see to point, by comparison, to the emptiness that is not seen.
Sixth, the conclusion of this section falls on the division between śrāvaka and bodhisattva, which is also the transition to the mutual inclusion of the thirty-seven limbs. Contemplating the four dharmas breaks the four inversions and opens the gate of the real mark; matched with the four truths of suffering, origination, cessation, and path, one has faith in the path of nirvāṇa, and the mind abides in happiness seemingly as if without outflows—this is “the dharma of heat”; having faith in the Three Jewels, with offence and merit held level, is the dharma of the summit; and on to acceptance, to arhat and pratyekabuddha—these are the fruits of recompense that the śrāvaka attains. The bodhisattva, however, within the same contemplation 「不忘本願,不捨大悲」 tr. "does not forget his original vow and does not abandon great compassion"; he first tames the ground of the mind with the emptiness of unfindability, so that though he has afflictions his mind never falls; his dharma of acceptance and highest worldly dharma are the compliant acceptance of dharmas, and his srota-āpanna path up to the pratyekabuddha path are 「須陀洹道,乃至阿羅漢、辟支佛道,即是菩薩無生法忍」 tr. "the srota-āpanna path, up to the arhat and pratyekabuddha paths, are the bodhisattva’s acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas". Although the four right efforts and the four bases of supernormal power each have their own position, all are within the four foundations of mindfulness—「慧多故,名『四念處』;精進多故,名『四正勤』;定多故,名『四如意足』」 tr. "because wisdom predominates, they are called ‘the four foundations of mindfulness’; because vigour predominates, they are called ‘the four right efforts’; because concentration predominates, they are called ‘the four bases of supernormal power’"—this is the mutual inclusion of the limbs of the path. As to why one who cultivates the thirty-seven limbs does not take nirvāṇa, the treatise-author answers 「本願牢故,大悲心深入故」 tr. "because his original vow is firm, and because the mind of great compassion has entered deeply", and gives as illustration the buddhas of the ten directions stretching out their hands to stroke his head, urging the bodhisattva not to extinguish the inverted mind, and that he ought to teach and transform beings with the Dharma of emptiness. Finally the three samādhi, the eleven knowledges, and on to the eighteen unshared dharmas are all passed over with “as said before,” and the whole section is gathered into a single sentence—「是諸法後皆用無所得故」 tr. "all these dharmas, in the end, are employed by way of there being nothing to be attained". The limbs of the path are shared with the two vehicles, but nothing-to-be-attained and the original vow are precisely the two unshared points by which they become the Great Vehicle.
Supplementary Notes on the Contemplations One by One: Three Similes, Two Kinds of Impurity, the Nine Contemplations of the Corpse
The preceding passage has already spoken of the opening-out and gathering-in of the twelve contemplations of the foundation of mindfulness of the body, and of contemplating the body by following it along and not giving rise to body-notions; here the details are filled in for three striking similes in the sūtra and the treatise, and for the successive stages of the nine contemplations of the corpse, so that this path of contemplating the body may be complete from head to tail.
First, the three similes. For contemplating in- and out-breathing, the sūtra takes the turner holding the cord as its simile—「入息長時知入息長,出息長時知出息長;入息短時知入息短,出息短時知出息短」 tr. "when the in-breath is long he knows the in-breath is long; when the out-breath is long he knows the out-breath is long; when the in-breath is short he knows the in-breath is short; when the out-breath is short he knows the out-breath is short", just as a master turner or his apprentice, working the cord, “knows long when the cord is long, knows short when the cord is short”; the length of each breath is distinct and clear and the mind does not run off after it—this is exactly where the sixteen parts of ānāpāna set against initial and sustained thought take hold. For contemplating the four great elements, the sūtra takes the cattle-butcher as its simile, and the treatise-author further takes the simile apart piece by piece: the ox is the practitioner’s body, the butcher is the practitioner, the knife is sharp wisdom, taking the ox’s life is breaking the mark of the body as one, the four portions are the four great elements—after the butcher has divided the ox into four portions, he sees before him only the four portions and no other ox, nor does he see anything called “ox”; the practitioner, contemplating the body with keen knowledge, sees only the four great elements of earth, water, fire, and wind and no other body, nor does he see any “my body.” What this simile would teach is precisely 「四大不名為身」 tr. "the four great elements are not called the body" and 「我不在四大中,四大不在我中」 tr. "the self is not in the four great elements, and the four great elements are not in the self"—the body is only a provisional name for the four great elements entering within. For contemplating the thirty-six things, the sūtra takes the farmer’s granary as its simile, and the treatise-author takes this apart too: the granary is the body, the farmer is the practitioner, the fields sown with grain are the causes and conditions of the practitioner’s bodily karma, the harvest brought into the granary is the practitioner’s obtaining a body when his causes and conditions ripen—a clear-eyed farmer, as soon as he opens the granary, distinguishes hemp, broomcorn millet, rice, foxtail millet, wheat, and beans, each of a different kind; the practitioner, opening this granary of the body with the eye of wisdom, knows that the thirty-six things, from the hair of the head, body hair, nails, and teeth up to the brain membrane, are filled with every kind of impurity and must surely decay. The three similes each treat one contemplation—the cord simile treats the breath, the ox simile treats self-clinging upon the four great elements, the granary simile treats the clinging to purity upon the body—and together they teach one thing: the body has no real self; it is only a provisional coming together of causes and conditions.
Next, the two kinds of impurity. The treatise-author divides impurity into two: “first, the already decayed; second, the not yet decayed.” First one contemplates one’s own body, not yet decayed and possessed of mind and consciousness; a person whose fetters are thin and whose faculties are sharp at once gives rise to revulsion; one of dull faculties and thick fetters must contemplate the already decayed dead, whose fearfulness and loathsomeness wrest away his clinging to purity. These are the two ways into the contemplation of impurity, the object contemplated differing according to whether the faculties are sharp or dull—not two dharmas, but the skilful adaptation of one and the same contemplation that treats desire to the two kinds of faculty, sharp and dull.
Last, the successive stages of the nine contemplations of the corpse. The sūtra enumerates nine marks of a corpse’s decay, and at each stage one reflects that one’s own body has such marks and such a nature and has not yet escaped this dharma. First: from the first to the fifth day, swollen and bloated, blue and bruised, pus and blood flowing out, the belly split and the organs rotting—the treatise-author fills in the scene: the kinsfolk still keep watch and birds and beasts have not yet eaten; facing this, the practitioner examines himself—「好色安在」 tr. "where now is the fair form?"—and knows that the beauty that once bewitched and beguiled people was only an illusory dharma that “deceives the eyes of the unwise”; second: on the sixth and seventh days, birds and beasts fighting over it to eat; third: when the birds and beasts have finished eating, the impurity rotting and stinking; fourth: the chain of bones smeared with blood and flesh, sinews and bones joined together; fifth: blood and flesh gone, sinews and bones joined together; sixth: the chain of bones scattered on the ground; seventh: the bones in different places—foot bones, shin and thigh bones, hips and ribs, spine and hands, neck bones, skull, each scattered to a different place; eighth: after many years, blown by wind and baked by sun, white as a conch shell; ninth: the old bones, sinews severed and joints loosened, dove-coloured, until they rot away and become the same colour as the earth. These nine stages are not meant to horrify; the treatise-author gathers them into four contemplations—first contemplating the thirty-six things and the five days of swelling is the contemplation of impurity; the birds and beasts eating, on to the same colour as the earth, is the contemplation of impermanence; seeking I and mine within it and not finding them is the contemplation of non-self; contemplating that there is nothing in the body to delight in is the contemplation of suffering—using the decay that the eye can see to point, by comparison, to the emptiness that is not seen.
Supplementary Notes on the Dharma-Meaning at the End of the Fascicle: Pleasant Feeling, the Impermanence of Mind, Foundation of Mindfulness and Foundation of Knowledge, Right Effort and Concentration
At the end of the fascicle of this unit, beyond the treatise’s explanation of heat, summit, and the other dharmas, there is a further complete doctrinal discussion that the preceding passages did not reach; it is supplied below.
First, the nature of pleasant feeling and the impermanence of mind. The treatise-author analyses worldly pleasure as having no reality at all—「此樂亦無住處,未來未有,過去已滅,現在不住,念念皆滅」 tr. "this pleasure, too, has no place of abiding: the future has not yet come to be, the past has already ceased, the present does not abide—moment by moment it all ceases"—and it is only because suffering is screened off that it is provisionally named pleasure. Taking food and drink as a simile: food and drink “are for the time being taken as pleasure because they remove the suffering of hunger and thirst; taken beyond measure, they give rise to suffering again,” which shows that pleasure arises from the causes and conditions of suffering and in turn gives rise to the result of suffering. Again, taking fine food mixed with poison as a simile: “though the food is fragrant and fine, the poison harms a person”; worldly pleasure is likewise, deceiving people for a moment and afterwards bringing immeasurable suffering. As for the mind that is able to feel pleasure, the treatise-author teaches that it arises and ceases moment by moment—「受苦心非樂心,受樂心非苦心,受不苦不樂心非苦樂心,時相各異」 tr. "the mind that feels suffering is not the mind of pleasure, the mind that feels pleasure is not the mind of suffering, the mind that feels neither suffering nor pleasure is not the mind of suffering or of pleasure; their times and marks are each different"—therefore the mind is impermanent; like “water-waves and a lamp’s flame,” it is precisely because the continuity is unbroken that its mark can be taken, while in reality it does not abide for an instant. Being impermanent it is not autonomous, and not being autonomous it is without self; perception, construction, and recollection are all likewise. The treatise-author first sets up this analysis in order to uproot the two thieves entrenched in the practice of contemplation—「貪、憂二賊,劫我法寶」 tr. "the two thieves, covetousness and grief, rob me of my Dharma-treasure": the practitioner reflects that this body is impermanent, impure, and loathsome—why then does he still covet it and stir up all kinds of causes and conditions for committing offences? Knowing that within there are the five faculties and without the five desires, and that only when the two come together does the inverted pleasure of the world arise, he is not robbed by this false pleasure. And the reason it is said that pleasure can rob a person is that the poison of the afflictions, such as sexual desire, has taken away the life of wisdom, and once a person is crazed and deluded he abandons benefit and chooses ruin; examined to its end, what feels the pleasure is nothing but that mind-consciousness which arises and ceases moment by moment. Seeing through this layer, the sweetness of pleasant feeling, the permanence of thought, and the reality of body and life—these three false appearances loosen all at once, and only then is the contemplation of the body not dragged back by covetousness and grief halfway through. This also connects back to the practice of “removing worldly covetousness and grief” in the preceding passage: once covetousness is removed the five hindrances all go, as when the first node of bamboo is split and the remaining nodes all follow; and the reason covetousness and grief are spoken of together is that those who have left home have given up worldly pleasure but have not yet attained the pleasure of concentration, and their minds easily give rise to grief like a fish longing for water, so the Buddha speaks of removing covetousness together with grief. Analysing pleasant feeling and analysing the impermanence of mind lays the doctrinal foundation for this removal of covetousness and grief—if one does not see the hollowness of pleasure and the impermanence of mind, covetousness and grief have no way to be cut off at the root.
Next, the simile of eating impurity at night. Practising the four noble modes of practice breaks the four inversions of purity, pleasure, permanence, and self, and so opens the gate of the real mark, and one is ashamed of what one had habitually practised before—the treatise-author uses eating at night as a simile: “as a person who eats something impure at night, when another makes clear to him that it was wrong, is ashamed of the matter”; a person who in the dark mistakenly eats something impure feels shame only once someone points it out; the practitioner, after breaking the inversions and seeing the real mark, looking back on the body he once loved and was attached to, which was impure from the first, is likewise ashamed of himself.
Next, foundation of mindfulness and foundation of knowledge. Question: since the real substance of the four foundations of mindfulness is wisdom, why are they not called “foundations of knowledge” but “foundations of mindfulness”? Answer: when one first practises, there is not yet time for knowledge to arise; 「念為初門,常念其事」 tr. "mindfulness is the first gate; one is constantly mindful of the matter", and wisdom arises following upon mindfulness, so mindfulness gives the name; moreover, 「念持智慧在緣中,不令散亂」 tr. "mindfulness holds wisdom within its object and does not let it scatter", which is exactly where the word “foundation” comes to rest—mindfulness is the move that binds wisdom fast to its object, hence the name foundation of mindfulness. This question and answer must not be skipped over: it points out the order of mindfulness and wisdom—mindfulness comes first and gathers, wisdom comes after and contemplates; the four foundations of mindfulness take their name from mindfulness and their substance from wisdom.
Last, right effort and concentration. Right effort is called “right” because it 「與九十六種邪行求道相違」 tr. "runs counter to the ninety-six kinds of wrong practice in seeking the path"—those of the outside paths give up the five desires and torment their own bodies, yet cannot give up what is evil and unwholesome nor gather wholesome dharmas; the Buddha, however, has two dharmas each for cutting off evil (removing what has already come, and guarding against what has not yet come so that it does not arise) and for producing good (causing what has not yet arisen to arise, and causing what has already arisen to grow), hence the name right effort. The treatise-author further uses fire and wind as a simile to weigh the excess and deficiency of vigour—「智慧火得正勤風,無所不燒」 tr. "the fire of wisdom, obtaining the wind of right effort, burns everything"; and yet 「正勤若過,心則散亂,智火微弱」 tr. "if right effort is excessive, the mind scatters and the fire of knowledge grows faint", just as a fire that gets wind in excess is instead either put out or made faint; so concentration is needed to check that wind of excessive vigour; concentration is of four kinds: concentration of desire, concentration of vigour, concentration of mind, and concentration of reflection. Finally, the treatise ranks the positions of these twelve dharmas (the four foundations of mindfulness, the four right efforts, the four bases of supernormal power): in people of dull faculties they are called “faculties,” as a tree has roots but not yet strength; in people of sharp faculties they are called “powers,” like a sharp knife cutting things, able to accomplish quickly. When the task is not yet accomplished they are called the “path”; when the task is accomplished and one reflects and cultivates, they are called “awakening.” These same twelve dharmas, according to whether the faculties are sharp or dull and whether the task is accomplished or not, bear the different names of faculty, power, path, and awakening.
Do Not Misread
Do not read “not giving rise to body-notions” as not contemplating the body, or as contemplating the body into emptiness and knowing nothing at all. Not giving rise to body-notions is not taking the marks of the body as one or different and so stirring up idle discourse; it is not a failure to contemplate; the treatise says plainly that the bodhisattva “does not take the marks of the body and yet is able to contemplate the body”—the contemplation is distinct and clear, only it does not fall into taking marks. To read it as closing one’s eyes and not contemplating is to read prajñā’s contemplation of the body as annihilation.
Do not read “first contemplating impurity” as meaning that impurity is final, or as taking the mark of impurity as real. The contemplation of impurity is only the first gate to the ambrosia, a skilful means that treats desire’s taking of the mark of purity; the nine contemplations of the corpse are in the end gathered into impermanence, non-self, and suffering, and further gathered into the ultimate emptiness of “because it is unfindable.” If one stops at the mark of impurity and treats it as a really existing object of loathing, one mistakes the first gate for the final ground.
Do not read “removing worldly covetousness and grief” as removing only the two afflictions of covetousness and grief. When covetousness is removed the five hindrances all go, as when the first node of bamboo is split and the remaining nodes all follow; covetousness and grief are spoken of together because, at the juncture of having given up worldly pleasure but not yet attained the pleasure of concentration, thoughts of grief easily arise, and covetousness is what accompanies worldly joy. Merely counting off one or two afflictions at the level of particulars loses the weight of “once the first node is split, the remaining nodes all go.”
Do not read the bodhisattva’s four foundations of mindfulness as the same road and the same fruit as the śrāvaka’s. The twelve contemplations cultivated are the same set, but the śrāvaka reaches only heat, summit, and acceptance, on up to arhatship, while the bodhisattva, adding the original vow and great compassion to the emptiness of unfindability, accomplishes compliant acceptance and the acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas, and cultivates the limbs of the path without taking nirvāṇa. To conflate the two is to erase the boundary between śrāvaka and bodhisattva that this section takes such care to draw.
Nor read “because it is unfindable” as discarding contemplative practice and passively not cultivating. This phrase is set as a crown precisely when body, feeling, mind, and dharmas are each being contemplated distinctly and clearly—it is contemplating without attachment, not not contemplating. To use ultimate emptiness as an excuse for lazy practice is exactly to read this section backwards.
Bearing on Practice
This section can serve as a measuring-rule for contemplating the body. When contemplating the body, one can ask: am I tracing and observing without taking the marks of the body, or have I once again quietly started reckoning whether the body is one or different, falling back into the idle discourse of “body-notions”? When cultivating impurity and the nine perceptions, one can ask: am I treating it as the first gate that treats covetous attachment, which must finally return to unfindability, or have I stopped at the loathsome marks, mistaking the skilful means for the final end?
This rule is of use in removing afflictions too: in removing covetousness and grief, am I like one splitting the first node of bamboo, so that the five hindrances follow and go, or am I only haggling over one or two particulars? In applying effort one can ask: is this diligent vigour of mine ceaseless and unresting like drilling wood for fire, one-minded and undisturbed, or is it scattered, slack, and powerless? The most important question is left for the arousing of the mind: in cultivating these four foundations of mindfulness, and even the thirty-seven limbs, am I seeking only heat, summit, and acceptance for my own escape, or do I not forget my original vow and not abandon great compassion, contemplating body, feeling, mind, and dharmas without taking nirvāṇa, and dedicating toward awakening? If one can hold firm in answering these questions, then one is contemplating the body without attachment within ultimate emptiness, and practising an unshared compassionate vow upon a gate of contemplation shared with the two vehicles—this is just how the four foundations of mindfulness look, at the starting-point, as they become Mahāyāna.
Further Resonances
The ancient masters who later read this section applied their effort most often to the definition of the inner and outer body and to the laying-out of the system of the limbs of the path: some, in terms of one’s own body and another’s body and of the division between the five faculties and the five sense-objects, finely distinguish what the inner body and the outer body refer to, developing along the same line as the treatise-author’s “one’s own body is called the inner body, another’s body is called the outer body”; some enumerate and distinguish the number of gates in the thirty-seven limbs of the path one by one, touching also on the mutual inclusion of numbered categories such as the ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, and the three foundations of mindfulness, sorting out for the reader the skeleton of this long series of limbs of the path; and some compare the nine marks with the ten perceptions, distinguishing where the contemplation of impurity comes out and goes in between opening-out and gathering-in. There are also ancient masters who noticed that the text of this chapter falls into two sections—the first on the four foundations of mindfulness, the second on the limbs of the path and the syllable-gates—and treated them as one whole, their commentary showing no difference between the two. These readings each have their own provenance; here only their approach is recorded, without judging which is higher.
Brought back to this unit, what is most worth keeping is not a finer outline, but this section’s prajñā rewriting of the limbs of the path. The four foundations of mindfulness were originally first among the thirty-seven limbs, cultivated alike with śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas; but once the sūtra crowns them with “because it is unfindable” and binds them to “does not forget his original vow and does not abandon great compassion,” the same set of twelve contemplations of the foundation of mindfulness of the body is, for the śrāvaka, the concluding of his own liberation from heat, summit, and acceptance on to arhatship, and for the bodhisattva becomes the acceptance of the non-arising of dharmas that does not take nirvāṇa. Body, feeling, mind, and dharmas are illuminated and contemplated and never set aside, while ultimate emptiness and the compassionate vow remain throughout that one unbroken thread. This section restores the three words “four foundations of mindfulness” from an old road shared with the two vehicles to the first gate of the Great Vehicle, able to carry people to the ground of buddhahood.