大智度論 四念處品Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · The Four Foundations of Mindfulness
這一品,佛從三十七道品的頭一組——四念處——起手,把整個道品的譜系攤開來,一一標作「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」。先是身念處:行住坐臥了了自知,入出息如旋師之知繩長短,觀身四大如屠者之分牛四分,觀三十六物之不淨如明眼農夫開倉辨穀,乃至見死屍九想、白骨如貝——一路觀身,卻「亦無身覺,以不可得故」。你或要問:既說「念處」,何不逕說「智處」?論主答得乾脆——「初習行時,未及有智;念為初門」,而其實「四念處實體是智慧」;念只是初入的門,智慧才是它的體。四念處慧勝,四正勤精進勝,四如意足定勝,同是一個道品之體,隨增上之法而異名。接著論主點出這一品最要緊的一道分野:聲聞觀四念處,得煖、頂、忍乃至四果,取以證滅便了;菩薩卻「不忘本願,不捨大悲」,雖修這三十七品而不取涅槃——「本願牢故,大悲心深入故」。他借七住地的夢喻說:菩薩如人夢中縛栰渡河、中流而覺,正想「我空自疲苦,無河無栰」而欲自滅倒心時,「十方佛伸手摩頭」,勸他念本願、以此空法去度眾生。同一四念處,聲聞取以自證,菩薩行以度生,分野正在般若所攝的這一點本願大悲。過了經文的第二道門檻,佛便把餘下的道品一口氣列全——四正勤、四如意分、五根五力、七覺八正、三三昧、十一智、三根、十念、諸禪定,乃至佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法——每一目都收在「以不可得故」。到最後,落到四十二字入門:阿字門「一切法初不生故」,一路到「過荼無字可得」,佛說「因字有語,因語有名,因名有義」,聞一字即通一切法之實相;而菩薩分別破散諸字,言語空、名空、義空,「得畢竟空,即是般若波羅蜜」。這,便是四念處品要你領會的:從四念處到四十二字門,種種道品名數,一一以「以不可得故」為印,同歸於般若之無所得,和合而成一個大乘之體——「如是等種種分別,是名『菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍』」。
In this chapter the Buddha begins from the first group of the thirty-seven limbs of the path, the four foundations of mindfulness, spreads open the whole lineage of the limbs of the path, and labels each of them ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna’. First the foundation of mindfulness of the body: in walking, standing, sitting, and lying one knows oneself clearly; in breathing in and out one is like a turner who knows the length of his cord; one contemplates the four great elements of the body as a butcher divides an ox into four parts; one contemplates the impurity of the thirty-six things as a clear-eyed farmer opening the granary and distinguishing the grains; and so on to seeing the nine perceptions of the corpse and the white bones like shells; contemplating the body all the way, and yet 「亦無身覺,以不可得故」 tr. "also without any notion of a body, because it is unfindable". You may ask: since it is called ‘foundation of mindfulness’, why not simply say ‘foundation of wisdom’? The treatise-author answers crisply: 「初習行時,未及有智;念為初門」 tr. "at the beginning of practice one has not yet reached wisdom; mindfulness is the first gate", while in truth 「四念處實體是智慧」 tr. "the real substance of the four foundations of mindfulness is wisdom"; mindfulness is only the gate of first entry, and wisdom is its substance. In the four foundations of mindfulness wisdom prevails, in the four right efforts vigour prevails, in the four bases of supernormal power concentration prevails; all are the one substance of the limbs of the path, differing in name according to which dharma is dominant. Then the treatise-author points out the most important dividing line of this chapter: śrāvakas contemplate the four foundations of mindfulness, attain heat, summit, acceptance, up to the four fruits, take them to realise cessation, and are done; the bodhisattva, however, 「不忘本願,不捨大悲」 tr. "does not forget his original vow and does not abandon great compassion", and though he cultivates these thirty-seven limbs he does not take nirvāṇa, 「本願牢故,大悲心深入故」 tr. "because his original vow is firm, because his mind of great compassion has entered deeply". He borrows the dream simile of the seventh abiding ground: the bodhisattva is like a man who in a dream binds a raft to cross a river and wakes midstream; just as he thinks ‘I have wearied myself for nothing; there is no river and no raft’ and is about to extinguish his inverted mind, 「十方佛伸手摩頭」 tr. "the Buddhas of the ten directions stretch out their hands and stroke his head", urging him to recollect his original vow and to deliver beings with this dharma of emptiness. The same four foundations of mindfulness: the śrāvaka takes them to realise for himself, the bodhisattva practises them to deliver beings, and the dividing line lies precisely in this original vow and great compassion that prajñā gathers in. Past the second threshold of the sūtra text, the Buddha lists all the remaining limbs of the path in one breath: the four right efforts, the four divisions of the bases of supernormal power, the five faculties and five powers, the seven limbs of awakening and the eightfold path, the three samādhi, the eleven knowledges, the three faculties, the ten recollections, the meditations and absorptions, up to the Buddha's ten powers, four fearlessnesses, four unobstructed knowledges, and eighteen unshared dharmas; every item is gathered into ‘because it is unfindable’. At the last it comes down to the forty-two syllable-gates: the gate of the syllable a, ‘because all dharmas from the first do not arise’, all the way to ‘beyond ḍha no syllable can be found’; the Buddha says 「因字有語,因語有名,因名有義」 tr. "from syllables come words, from words come names, from names comes meaning", and hearing one syllable one penetrates the real mark of all dharmas; and the bodhisattva distinguishes and breaks apart the syllables, words empty, names empty, meaning empty, 「得畢竟空,即是般若波羅蜜」 tr. "attaining ultimate emptiness, which is prajñāpāramitā". This is what the Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness wants you to grasp: from the four foundations of mindfulness to the forty-two syllable-gates, every enumerated limb of the path is sealed with ‘because it is unfindable’, all return alike to prajñā's nothing to be attained, and join together to form one body of the Great Vehicle: 「如是等種種分別,是名『菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍』」 tr. "distinctions of every kind such as these are named ‘the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna’".
總說
〈四念處品〉緊承前品而來。前之〈摩訶衍品〉問大乘以何為體,佛答其體是六波羅蜜,復以十八空、百八三昧廣分別之。本品則仍用同一句式往下開——經文一段一段皆以「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」標起,自「所謂四念處」以下,歷四正勤、四如意、五根五力、七覺八正、三三昧、諸智乃至四十二字入門,逐一納之於摩訶衍。所釋之經題此為「廣乘品」,正謂廣舉大乘之所攝;本論題為「四念處品」,則取所廣之首目為名。全品之樞紐即在此——這一長串道品善法所以皆得名摩訶衍,不在其數之繁,而在其一一皆冠此摩訶衍之名、皆收「以不可得故」之印。四念處本是三乘共修之法,論主特為點出菩薩之異:菩薩於是觀中「不忘本願,不捨大悲,先用不可得空調伏心地」,故雖遍修三十七品而不取涅槃。是以同一四念處,聲聞修之以趣寂滅,菩薩修之則成摩訶衍;道品之為大乘,其判正在無所得般若一以貫之。
本品循此樞紐分兩單元開展。上單元(四念處)——經先揭四念處身受心法四觀,而詳明身念處之種種循身觀:行住坐臥四威儀、出入息之數、觀身四大、從足至頂三十六物之不淨,以至棄屍膖脹青瘀乃至白骨在地之九想。論則逐一釋其義——內外身之分、「循身觀」之尋隨、「不生身覺」之不起戲論、「勤精進一心」與「除世間貪憂」之所以,明四聖行破四顛倒、開實相門,配四諦而歷煖頂忍世第一法。至此聲聞取果,論主轉入菩薩,明「四念處實體是智慧」,而菩薩修之不取涅槃,終以「慧多故,名『四念處』;精進多故,名『四正勤』;定多故,名『四如意足』」通貫三十七品,並以「如先說」「如初品中說」預攝下文諸法數,收於「是諸法後皆用無所得故」一句。下單元(道品與字門)——經承前句式,逐一舉四正勤、四如意分、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分、三三昧、十一智、三根、十念乃至四禪四無量八背捨九次第定、佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法,終之以四十二字入門:自阿字「一切法初不生」,歷羅、波、遮、那以下,至荼字「邊竟處不可得」,過荼更無字可得,「當知一切諸法如虛空」。論則專釋「字等、語等」,明「四十二字是一切字根本」,逐字附秦言之訓而歸於——菩薩分別破散諸字,言語亦空,名空義空,「得畢竟空,即是般若波羅蜜」。一部之中,自最粗之身念處以至最細之字音,無一不名摩訶衍、無一不歸不可得,故品末結穴為「如是等種種分別,是名『菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍』」——道品字門之廣,終不出無所得般若一體。
Overview
“The Four Foundations of Mindfulness” follows closely on the preceding chapter. The preceding “Mahāyāna” asked what the Great Vehicle takes as its substance; the Buddha answered that its substance is the six perfections, and further distinguished it at length by the eighteen emptinesses and the hundred and eight samādhi. This chapter goes on opening in the same sentence pattern—section after section, the sūtra text is headed with 「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」 tr. "the Mahāyāna of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva", and from “namely, the four foundations of mindfulness” onward, through the four right efforts, the four bases of supernormal power, the five faculties and five powers, the seven limbs of awakening and the eight limbs of the right path, the three samādhi, the various knowledges, and so on to entry through the forty-two syllables, it takes each one in turn into the Mahāyāna. The sūtra chapter explained here is titled “The Broad Vehicle,” meaning precisely that it sets out at large what the Great Vehicle contains; the treatise titles it “The Four Foundations of Mindfulness,” taking its name from the first of the items it sets out. The pivot of the whole chapter lies just here—that this long string of wholesome dharmas, the limbs of the path, can all be called Mahāyāna lies not in the multitude of their number, but in this: each one of them is crowned with this name Mahāyāna, and each receives the seal 「以不可得故」 tr. "because it is unfindable". The four foundations of mindfulness are originally a dharma cultivated in common by the three vehicles; the treatise-author specially points out the bodhisattva’s difference: in this contemplation the bodhisattva 「不忘本願,不捨大悲,先用不可得空調伏心地」 tr. "does not forget his original vow, does not abandon great compassion, and first uses the emptiness of the unfindable to tame the ground of the mind", and therefore, though he cultivates all thirty-seven limbs of the path, he does not take nirvāṇa. Thus the very same four foundations of mindfulness, cultivated by the śrāvaka, tend toward quiescent cessation, while cultivated by the bodhisattva they become the Mahāyāna; that the limbs of the path are the Great Vehicle is judged precisely by the prajñā of nothing to be attained running through them as one.
The chapter unfolds along this pivot in two units. The first unit (the four foundations of mindfulness)—the sūtra first discloses the four contemplations of the four foundations of mindfulness, of body, feeling, mind, and dharmas, and sets out in detail the various contemplations following the body that belong to the foundation of mindfulness of the body: the four postures of walking, standing, sitting, and lying down; the counting of the breath going out and coming in; contemplating the body as the four great elements; the impurity of the thirty-six things from the feet to the crown; and on to the nine perceptions, from the discarded corpse swollen and bloated, blue and bruised, up to the white bones lying on the ground. The treatise explains their meaning one by one—the distinction of the inner and the outer body; 「循身觀」 tr. "contemplation following the body" as tracing along and following; 「不生身覺」 tr. "not giving rise to thoughts of the body" as not raising idle discourse; the reasons for “diligent vigour with a single mind” and for “removing covetousness and grief in the world”—making clear that the four noble practices break the four inversions and open the gate of the real mark, and, matched to the four truths, pass through heat, summit, acceptance, and the highest worldly dharma. Having reached the point where the śrāvaka takes the fruit, the treatise-author turns to the bodhisattva and makes clear that 「四念處實體是智慧」 tr. "the real substance of the four foundations of mindfulness is wisdom", and that the bodhisattva who cultivates them does not take nirvāṇa; at the end, with 「慧多故,名『四念處』;精進多故,名『四正勤』;定多故,名『四如意足』」 tr. "because wisdom predominates, they are called ‘the four foundations of mindfulness’; because vigour predominates, they are called ‘the four right efforts’; because concentration predominates, they are called ‘the four bases of supernormal power’", it runs through all thirty-seven limbs of the path as one, and with “as said before” and “as said in the first chapter” it gathers in advance the lists of dharmas below, closing them in the single sentence 「是諸法後皆用無所得故」 tr. "all these dharmas, afterward, are used by way of nothing to be attained". The second unit (the limbs of the path and the syllable gates)—the sūtra continues the preceding sentence pattern and raises one by one the four right efforts, the four divisions of the bases of supernormal power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven limbs of awakening, the eight limbs of the noble path, the three samādhi, the eleven knowledges, the three roots, the ten recollections, and on to the four meditations, the four immeasurable minds, the eight liberations, the nine successive absorptions, the Buddha’s ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, and the eighteen unshared dharmas, ending with entry through the forty-two syllables: from the syllable a, 「一切法初不生」 tr. "all dharmas from the very first do not arise", through ra, pa, ca, na, and those below, to the syllable ḍha, 「邊竟處不可得」 tr. "the place where the edge ends is unfindable"; past ḍha there is no further syllable to be obtained, and 「當知一切諸法如虛空」 tr. "know that all dharmas are like empty space". The treatise explains specifically 「字等、語等」 tr. "syllables are equal, speech is equal", makes clear that 「四十二字是一切字根本」 tr. "the forty-two syllables are the root of all syllables", attaches to each syllable its gloss in the language of Qin, and returns to this—the bodhisattva distinguishes, breaks apart, and scatters the syllables; speech too is empty, the name empty and the meaning empty; 「得畢竟空,即是般若波羅蜜」 tr. "attaining ultimate emptiness is precisely prajñāpāramitā". Within this single section, from the coarsest, the foundation of mindfulness of the body, to the finest, the sounds of the syllables, there is none not called Mahāyāna and none not returning to the unfindable; therefore the chapter’s close comes to its knot as 「如是等種種分別,是名『菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍』」 tr. "such various distinctions as these are called ‘the Mahāyāna of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’"—the breadth of the limbs of the path and the syllable gates never goes beyond the single substance of the prajñā of nothing to be attained.
承衍
〈四念處品〉的義脈,前有所承,後有所啟。所承者是前之〈摩訶衍品〉——彼品問大乘以何為體,佛答其體是六波羅蜜,復以十八空、百八三昧廣分別之,而一一以無所得為印。本品正承此而廣其乘:經文仍以「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」逐段標起,自「所謂四念處」以下,盡舉三十七道品、諸智、諸法數乃至四十二字入門,一一納入摩訶衍。故所釋之經題此為「廣乘品」,取廣舉大乘所攝為義;本論題為「四念處品」,取所廣之首目為名,二名同指一事——續前品之問,廣大乘之攝。而其廣仍不出畢竟空:道品字門一一收「以不可得故」,論末結以「是諸法後皆用無所得故」,正與前品十八空、百八三昧之同歸無所得,是同一印。所啟者則是其後之〈發趣品〉。前品開端,須菩提所問非一——既問大乘以何為體,復問「云何當知菩薩摩訶薩發趣大乘」;前品與本品廣答其第一問,至本品而摩訶衍之體與廣已舉之周。次品〈發趣品〉乃轉答第二問,佛言菩薩「行六波羅蜜時,從一地至一地,是名菩薩摩訶薩大乘發趣」,於是自初地十事、二地八法以下,明十地之發趣行法。摩訶衍之所攝既廣舉已周,經文順此而入十地——前品立體,本品廣攝,後品發趣,三品是同一條般若之路的次第推展。
後來古德讀本品,因所據經本題名之異,於品名先有兩讀。吉藏《大品經義疏》從所釋之經一側,題本品為「廣乘品第十九」,且自道「文句一二如此,疏皆無異也」——已見其意識本品文分兩節(近本版之兩單元),而其疏統貫兩節、不別施解。其疏於兩單元皆有實質科判:於上單元,辨內外身之分(與論①「自身名內身,他身名外身」相通),列三十七道品之體系而云「三十七道品門,三十七門等空,共數六十力、四無畏、大悲三念處也」,並逐條疏解十八不共法;於下單元則於四十二字門著墨尤詳,謂「此四十二字辨大乘一切名也」,明「因字有語,因語有名,因名有義」之教理鏈,而釋「字等、語等」之義為字與空平等、於諸好字不起憎愛——較前品單元二之僅一句帶過,本品吉藏之字門疏反更詳備。慧影《大智度論疏》則於本品全然無疏可徵:其疏卷十八至二十佚失不存,而本品所在之卷四十八恰落此闕卷之中;今存疏內雖亦有論四十二字陀羅尼之文,然核其所繫,乃疏〈序品〉先出之四十二字段落,非本品之疏,名同而所指異——是卷佚而疏不見於今藏,非慧影未疏,尤不可代擬以充其闕。均正《大乘四論玄義》為教理論書而非逐文疏,其引「行六波羅蜜、四念處乃至十八不共法」一組道品覆述之語,明標出自「發趣品最末」,乃引本品之次品〈發趣品〉,非本品〈廣乘品〉本身,於本品實無直接逐字之引。至若天台一系以四念處為觀行要目,智顗別有《四念處》之作,然彼所開者乃四念處法門之自身,非疏此論之品,名同而事異。此處唯誌錄諸家讀本品之處與其詳略存佚,以見各家如何讀本品,或因卷佚、因同名而未及讀本品,不判其詮釋高下,亦不取一家之判以定本品之義。
把這一路承衍帶回本品,最值得保存的不是一張更長的道品名目表,而是它為道品立法的方式。四念處以下、乃至四十二字之音,所以皆名摩訶衍,不在其數之多,而在其一一皆收「以不可得故」之印。聲聞亦修四念處,然歷煖頂忍而趣寂滅;菩薩修同一四念處,而「不忘本願,不捨大悲,先用不可得空調伏心地」,故雖遍修三十七品而不取證。因此本品留下一條可反覆使用的讀法:凡遇經舉一法為摩訶衍——無論是身念處之不淨、七覺八正之道支,抑或一字之音——即問此法如何以不可得而行、如何同歸畢竟空之般若;於每一處答好這一問,便知道品字門之廣,終不出前品所立之一體,而大乘之廣舉,始終即空而立、不離般若。
Further Resonances
The vein of meaning in the chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness has something it inherits before it and something it opens after it. What it inherits is the preceding chapter, Mahāyāna—that chapter asks what the Great Vehicle takes as its substance; the Buddha answers that its substance is the six perfections, and further distinguishes it broadly by the eighteen emptinesses and the hundred and eight samādhi, sealing each one with nothing to be attained. This chapter directly inherits this and broadens the vehicle: the sūtra text still marks the start of each section with “the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’s Mahāyāna,” and from “namely, the four foundations of mindfulness” onward it lists in full the thirty-seven limbs of the path, the knowledges, the numbered sets of dharmas, and even entry through the gates of the forty-two letters, gathering each one into the Mahāyāna. Therefore in the sūtra being explained this is titled “Broadening the Vehicle,” taking as its sense the broad listing of what the Great Vehicle includes; this treatise titles it “The Four Foundations of Mindfulness,” taking its name from the first heading of what is broadened. The two names point to one and the same matter—continuing the preceding chapter’s question, broadening what the Great Vehicle includes. Yet its broadening still does not go beyond ultimate emptiness: each limb of the path and each letter-gate is gathered in by 「以不可得故」 tr. "because it is unfindable," and the treatise at its end concludes with 「是諸法後皆用無所得故」 tr. "because all these dharmas are afterwards used by way of nothing to be attained," which is exactly the same seal as the preceding chapter’s eighteen emptinesses and hundred and eight samādhi returning alike to nothing to be attained. What it opens is the chapter after it, Setting Out. At the opening of the preceding chapter, what Subhūti asked was not one thing—he asked what the Great Vehicle takes as its substance, and further asked 「云何當知菩薩摩訶薩發趣大乘」 tr. "How should one know the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’s setting out toward the Great Vehicle?"; the preceding chapter and this chapter broadly answer his first question, and by this chapter the substance and the breadth of the Mahāyāna have been listed in full. The next chapter, Setting Out, then turns to answer the second question: the Buddha says that when a bodhisattva 「行六波羅蜜時,從一地至一地,是名菩薩摩訶薩大乘發趣」 tr. "practises the six perfections, going from one ground to another ground—this is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’s setting out in the Great Vehicle," and thereupon, from the ten matters of the first ground and the eight dharmas of the second ground onward, it makes clear the practices and dharmas of setting out through the ten grounds. What the Mahāyāna includes having been listed in full, the sūtra text follows on from this into the ten grounds—the preceding chapter establishes the substance, this chapter broadly gathers in, the following chapter sets out: the three chapters are the successive unfolding of one and the same path of prajñā.
When later ancient masters read this chapter, because the sūtra texts they relied on differed in title, there were from the first two readings of the chapter’s name. Jizang, in his Commentary on the Larger Sūtra, working from the side of the sūtra being explained, titles this chapter “Chapter Nineteen, Broadening the Vehicle,” and himself says 「文句一二如此,疏皆無異也」 tr. "The text, in its one and two, is like this; the commentary is without difference throughout"—which shows he was already aware that the chapter’s text falls into two sections (close to this collection’s two units), while his commentary runs through both sections as one and does not give them separate explanations. His commentary has substantive structural division in both units: in the first unit, he distinguishes inner and outer body (in keeping with Treatise ①’s 「自身名內身,他身名外身」 tr. "one’s own body is called the inner body; another’s body is called the outer body"), lays out the system of the thirty-seven limbs of the path, saying 「三十七道品門,三十七門等空,共數六十力、四無畏、大悲三念處也」 tr. "The gates of the thirty-seven limbs of the path—the thirty-seven gates, and so on to emptiness—counted together make sixty; the powers, the four fearlessnesses, great compassion, and the three foundations of mindfulness," and explains the eighteen unshared dharmas item by item; in the second unit he writes most fully on the gates of the forty-two letters, saying 「此四十二字辨大乘一切名也」 tr. "These forty-two letters distinguish all the names of the Great Vehicle," making clear the chain of teaching 「因字有語,因語有名,因名有義」 tr. "Because of letters there are words; because of words there are names; because of names there is meaning," and explaining the meaning of “letters equal, words equal” as letters being equal with emptiness, giving rise to neither hatred nor love toward the fine letters—compared with unit two of the preceding chapter, which passes over them in a single sentence, Jizang’s commentary on the letter-gates in this chapter is on the contrary more detailed and complete. For Huiying’s Commentary, by contrast, there is for this chapter no commentary at all that can be verified: fascicles eighteen to twenty of his commentary are lost and do not survive, and fascicle forty-eight, in which this chapter falls, lies precisely within this gap of missing fascicles; though the surviving commentary also contains passages discussing the dhāraṇī of the forty-two letters, when one checks what they are attached to, they are the passages commenting on the forty-two letters as they first appear in the chapter on the Introduction, not commentary on this chapter—the name is the same, but what it points to differs. It is that the fascicles are lost and so the commentary is not seen in the present canon, not that Huiying did not comment on it; still less may one compose a substitute to fill the gap. Junzheng’s Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises is a doctrinal treatise, not a line-by-line commentary; the words it cites recapitulating a group of limbs of the path, 「行六波羅蜜、四念處乃至十八不共法」 tr. "practising the six perfections, the four foundations of mindfulness, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas," are expressly marked as coming from “the very end of the chapter on Setting Out,” and so cite the chapter following this one, Setting Out, not this chapter, Broadening the Vehicle, itself; for this chapter there is in fact no direct word-for-word citation. As for the Tiantai line, which takes the four foundations of mindfulness as a key heading of contemplative practice, Zhiyi separately composed a work, The Four Foundations of Mindfulness, but what it opens up is the dharma-gate of the four foundations of mindfulness itself, not a commentary on this chapter of the treatise—the name is the same, but the matter differs. Here only the places where the various masters read this chapter, and how full or sparse, surviving or lost, their treatment is, are recorded, to show how each master read this chapter, or, because of a lost fascicle or a shared name, did not come to read it; their interpretations are not judged higher or lower, nor is one master’s judgement taken to settle the meaning of this chapter.
Bringing this whole line of further resonances back to this chapter, what is most worth keeping is not a longer table of the names of the limbs of the path, but the way it lays down the rule for the limbs of the path. That everything from the four foundations of mindfulness onward, up to the sounds of the forty-two letters, is called Mahāyāna lies not in their great number but in each of them bearing the seal 「以不可得故」 tr. "because it is unfindable." Śrāvakas too cultivate the four foundations of mindfulness, yet they pass through heat, summit, and acceptance and head for quiescent cessation; the bodhisattva cultivates the same four foundations of mindfulness, yet 「不忘本願,不捨大悲,先用不可得空調伏心地」 tr. "does not forget his original vow, does not abandon great compassion, and first uses the emptiness of the unfindable to tame the ground of the mind," and so, though cultivating all thirty-seven limbs throughout, does not take realisation. Therefore this chapter leaves behind a way of reading that can be used again and again: whenever the sūtra raises a dharma as Mahāyāna—whether the impurity of the foundation of mindfulness of the body, the path-limbs of the seven limbs of awakening and the eightfold right path, or the sound of a single letter—ask how this dharma is practised by way of the unfindable, and how it returns alike to the prajñā of ultimate emptiness; answer this one question well at each place, and one knows that the breadth of the limbs of the path and the letter-gates in the end never goes beyond the one substance established in the preceding chapter, and that the broad listing of the Great Vehicle is, from start to finish, established right in emptiness and inseparable from prajñā.
考據Apparatus
一、科判
本品在《大智度論》釋《大品般若》之次第中屬〈釋餘品〉一段,論自題「大智度論釋四念處品第十九」〔T25 0402c14〕。全品實落於單一卷四十八之內,不跨卷;經本帙拆為二讀者單元,其切割點〔T25 0406a15〕落於論①收句與經②起句之自然接縫上——非如前〈摩訶衍品〉之切割恰合物理卷界,本品之切割純為讀者篇幅之界,繫於經、論本身之段落轉換。
本品之經論架構為二〈經〉二〈論〉相承——經①〔T25 0402c18〕、論①〔T25 0403c04〕、經②〔T25 0406a15〕、論②〔T25 0408b01〕——非單經單論、亦非跨卷。單元一〈四念處〉:【經】①自〔T25 0402c18〕「佛告須菩提」起,佛立四念處為菩薩摩訶衍,展身念處之十二種觀(行住坐臥、入出息、觀四大、三十六物不淨、死屍九想乃至白骨如貝),並略舉受、心、法三念處;【論】①自〔T25 0403c04〕「問曰:四念處中有種種觀」起,以十問十答釋四念處之名義、內外之別、循身觀與不生身覺、勤精進一心、除世間貪憂諸目,兼以三十七道品之互攝過渡收束,訖論①收句〔T25 0406a13〕「是諸法後皆用無所得故」。單元二〈道品與字門〉:【經】②自〔T25 0406a15〕承身念處九想之收尾(歲久色如鴿、與土共合),總收受心法三念處,繼列其餘道品——四正勤、四如意分、五根、五力、七覺分、八聖道分、三三昧、十一智、三根、十念、諸禪定、佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法——終以四十二字入門及二十功德收,訖經②收句〔T25 0408a28〕「是陀羅尼門、阿字門等,是名菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」;【論】②自〔T25 0408b01〕「釋曰」起,釋「字等、語等」之義,逐一釋四十二字並附秦言訓詁,復設問答釋二十功德,收於全品終句〔T25 0409c14〕「如是等種種分別,是名『菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍』」。
卷首題款隨分卷而異。本品為卷四十八之首品,品題「大智度論釋四念處品第十九」後具造譯題款「龍樹菩薩造」〔T25 0402c16〕、「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」〔T25 0402c17〕,與跨卷、開卷單元卷首帶題款之慣例相符;單元二〔T25 0406a15〕居卷四十八之中段,承前經文而下,無品題、無造譯題款。此與前〈摩訶衍品〉之題款分佈適相反(該品單元一居卷四十六之次品而無題款、單元二為卷四十七之卷首而有題款),二品題款之有無各繫其於物理卷中之位置,皆各自結構正確。
本品品名於傳本間有一重須先辨之異名。本論大正底本題「四念處品」,明本附注「經作廣乘品」,宮本逕題「廣乘品」,石本則品次自報第十八、卷次自報五十(品次負一、卷次正二);所釋經後秦鳩摩羅什譯《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》於同一位置題「廣乘品第十九」〔T08 0253b17〕,其品題容器內別有丹本注記,標本品在丹本作四念處品(T08 0253b18 丹本夾注)。兩部同出羅什之手,四念處、廣乘二讀各自在對方文本內部留下互指之校本異文,構成雙向互證之閉環(詳第四目、第八目;此為本論釋《大品》諸品之品題交叉印證之第二例,首例見前〈摩訶衍品〉之摩訶衍、問乘二讀)。本目及以下讀者面正文一律隨本論題稱〈四念處品〉,餘稱誌錄不判。
本品之校勘有二重須先誌之特殊格局,皆詳第八目、本目先標其存在。其一,宮本於本卷(卷四十八·品十九全品)現存且逐條可校,與前〈摩訶衍品〉之上半(卷四十六)宮本整卷缺席適相反——勿誤襲前品之宮缺判。其二,石本品次負一與卷次正二之雙軌偏移,於品題起點完全確證(獲第四例連續確證),然於卷末收尾出現兩處未消解之異常(卷次石本讀十五、品次石本讀八品竟而缺一十字),本目誠實記為未消解疑點,不強行納入既有偏移框架。
二、術語考
四念處(三十七道品之首·品命脈之一)。 本品得名之所繫。經以四念處為菩薩摩訶衍之首,云「所謂四念處」〔T25 0402c18〕,開身、受、心、法四處,於身念處展十二種觀,各繫「循身觀,亦無身覺,以不可得故」。論主辨其名義:問何以說「念處」而不說「智處」,答云「初習行時,未及有智;念為初門」〔T25 0405c03〕,而點明其實體,云「四念處實體是智慧」〔T25 0405c04〕——以念為初入之門,其實體則是智慧,觀內外身即是智慧,念持智慧在緣中不令散亂,故名「念處」。論復釋「循身觀」者〔T25 0404a11〕尋隨觀察其不淨,釋「不生身覺」者〔T25 0404a15〕不取身一異相而生戲論。
三十七道品(四念處統攝·慧精進定之分位)。 四念處為三十七道品之首,餘道品皆以四念處為體而各有偏勝。論主明其分位,云「四正勤、四如意足,雖各各別位,皆在四念處中」〔T25 0405b28〕,復判其偏勝,云「慧多故,名『四念處』;精進多故,名『四正勤』;定多故,名『四如意足』」〔T25 0405b29〕——四念處慧勝、四正勤精進勝、四如意足定勝,同一道品體而隨增上之法立名。單元二則以【經】體逐一列名四正勤乃至八聖道分、三三昧、十一智、三根、十念諸道品法數,各冠「以不可得故」而歸摩訶衍。
四十二字入門(陀羅尼·單元二命脈)。 單元二之骨,亦全品字數最鉅之一段。經先立「字等、語等諸字入門」〔T25 0407c10〕,逐一出四十二字之門,首「阿字門,一切法初不生故」〔T25 0407c11〕,終於「過荼無字可得」〔T25 0408a13〕,凡四十二門,一一皆以不可得立義(如阿字之一切法初不生、羅字之一切法離垢)。論主釋其所以,云「四十二字是一切字根本」〔T25 0408b12〕,而立字、語、名、義之相生,云「因字有語,因語有名,因名有義」〔T25 0408b12〕——菩薩若聞一字,即隨其義通達一切法之實相;論復逐一釋四十二字並附秦言訓詁(阿提秦言初、阿耨波陀秦言不生等)。
以不可得故(般若攝道品之印·貫穿全品)。 本品身念處十二觀、單元二之三十七道品逐目、四十二字入門乃至二十功德,一一皆以「以不可得故」為其收梢。此非道品之外別加一語,乃以般若之無所得印一切道品字門,令四念處之循身觀「亦無身覺」、令諸道品之修習不著能所——是本品一切法數之共印,亦其會歸般若之樞(詳第五目)。
三、譬喻與故事
《大智度論》以譬喻著稱,本品之教學命脈,在經自身於身念處所設之數喻、及論主釋四念處與二十功德時所展之連環喻。皆繫於觀身不淨、以慧攝行而不著。
其一,經自身身念處三喻(單元一·經)。明入出息之知長知短,經設旋師之喻,云「譬如旋師,若旋師弟子,繩長知長,繩短知短」〔T25 0403a08〕——如製陶旋輪者於繩之長短了了分明,菩薩於入出息之長短亦如是知。明觀身四大之分別,論釋經之屠牛喻,云「『牛』即是行者身,『屠兒』即是行者,『刀』是利智慧」〔T25 0404b25〕——以利智之刀分身為地水火風四大,如屠者分牛四分,更無別牛。明三十六物之不淨,論釋經之穀倉喻,云「穀倉是身,農夫是行者」〔T25 0404c08〕——如明眼農夫開倉即辨稻麻黍粟,行者以慧眼開身倉即知其中不淨充滿。
其二,論釋四念處之精進喻(單元一·論)。釋「勤精進一心」,設攢燧求火之喻,云「譬如攢燧求火,一心勤著,不休不息,乃可得火」〔T25 0404a26〕——鑽木取火須一心不息乃得,自離其身、自離其心之難,非一心勤精進不可得。釋「除世間貪憂」,設破竹之喻,云「猶如破竹,初節既破,餘節皆去」〔T25 0404a28〕——貪除則五蓋盡去,如破竹初節既破,餘節皆迎刃而解。釋世間樂之虛妄,設美食雜毒之喻,云「譬如美食雜毒,食雖香美,毒則害人」〔T25 0405a28〕——世間樂如雜毒之美食,暫以遮苦為樂,過度則生苦無量。
其三,菩薩不取涅槃之故事喻(單元一·論)。論主釋菩薩修三十七品而不取涅槃,展七住地夢中縛栰之喻,云「如人夢中縛栰渡河,中流而覺」〔T25 0405c27〕——菩薩到七住地,外觀諸法空、內觀無我,如人夢中縛栰渡河、中流而覺,念「我空自疲苦,無河無栰」而欲自滅倒心;是時「十方佛伸手摩頭」〔T25 0406a01〕,勸其莫生悔心、念其本願,以此空法教化眾生。此一連環故事,為本品菩薩道異於聲聞取證之關鍵所在(詳第五目)。破竹之喻復於單元二論釋二十功德之「得陀羅尼」處再現,云「譬如破竹,初節既破,餘者皆易」〔T25 0409b13〕——得文字陀羅尼則諸陀羅尼自然而得,與單元一「除貪憂」之破竹喻同機而異用。
四、所釋經文
本論所牒之【經】段,與後秦鳩摩羅什譯《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》〈廣乘品第十九〉逐項相承。以下逐字對位,證論所釋確係此本經文;其二段【論】插入處,尤見本品義理之骨在論。
第一組,品題異名之雙向互證閉環(本品第四目之樞·兩造傳本各指對方·系列第二例)。本論〔T25 0402c14〕大正底本題「大智度論釋四念處品第十九」,其明本異文注記「經作廣乘品」——明本自標「經作廣乘品」,直指所釋經之題名;其宮本更逕題「廣乘品」(品次仍第十九,惟品名捨「四念處」而從「廣乘」)。所釋經 T223〔T08 0253b17〕大正底本題「廣乘品第十九」,其品題容器內別有丹本注記「丹本名為四念處品」(T08 0253b18 丹本夾注)——T223 自身之丹本異文,直指本論之題名。是兩部同出羅什之作,四念處、廣乘二讀各自在對方文本內部留下校本層級之交叉指涉,形成跨文本、雙向、互證之閉環(此為本論釋《大品》諸品之品題校本交叉印證之第二例,與前〈摩訶衍品〉摩訶衍、問乘二讀同型)。石本則另題「品第十八…卷五十」(品次負一,詳第八目)。
第二組,四念處總標逐字近全同。本論〔T25 0402c18〕「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍,所謂四念處」與 T223〔T08 0253b19〕「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍,所謂四念處」逐字相承(含標點幾近全同);其下身念處十二種觀(行住坐臥、入出息、觀四大、三十六物、九想)兩本亦逐項相應,惟 T223 於內身循身觀起處逕作陳述句、本論作「云何內身中循身觀」之設問句式,為敘述層之異,內容仍對應。
第三組,九想收尾與受心法總收句——確證單元切割點在 T223 亦為經文自身之分界。本論經②起句〔T25 0406a15〕「見是棄死人骨在地,歲久,其色如鴿」與 T223〔T08 0254b09〕同處「歲久,其色如鴿,腐朽爛壞,與土共合」逐字近同;其下總收三念處句,本論〔T25 0406a20〕「受念處、心念處、法念處亦應如是廣說」與 T223〔T08 0254b13〕「外身、內外身亦如是,受念處、心念處、法念處亦應如是廣說」逐字相承。是本論二讀者單元之切割點(經②起,繫於身念處九想之收尾),於 T223 亦為經文自身九想結束、道品開列之自然分界,非本論自訂之切割——單元切割與經文本有之段落轉換相合。
第四組,二段【論】皆本論獨有之插入。本品有二段論釋——論①〔T25 0403c04–0406a13〕(十問十答釋四念處名義、內外、循身觀、勤精進、除貪憂,兼三十七品過渡)與論②〔T25 0408b01–0409c14〕(釋「字等、語等」、逐一釋四十二字並附秦言、問答釋二十功德)——於 T223 皆全無對應:T223〈廣乘品〉之全量恰與本論二段【經】之並集重合(其於論①、論②對應處皆無論釋,逕由經文自身之段落相續),二段【論】全落於 T223 品界之外。二段之中,論②篇幅(含四十二字逐一釋名附秦言訓詁、二十功德逐一釋)為本論釋《大品》諸品中已知最大宗之單一插入段,論①次之——與前〈摩訶衍品〉同型(該品二論亦皆本論獨有插入、經皆對應 T223 連續無斷之段落)。
(跨傳本與本論自身之字面異文——四正勤之勤與懃、四無礙智之礙與閡、三根之知者根與智者根、十念之念滅與念善,及本論自身經列名層與論釋層四十二字八處用字之不一——並歸第八目,逐條誌其傳本分佈,不代判定。)
五、般若義眼
本品之眼,在四念處為三十七道品之首,一切道品、字門皆是菩薩摩訶衍,而其修習一一以「以不可得故」為印,同歸般若之無所得。
其一,以念為初門而實體是智慧。四念處雖以「念」立名,論主明其實體,云「四念處實體是智慧」〔T25 0405c04〕,而所以立「念」者,「初習行時,未及有智;念為初門」〔T25 0405c03〕——念為初入之方便,智慧為其實體;三十七道品慧、精進、定各有偏勝而同一道品之體〔T25 0405b28〕。是本品之修觀,非徒繫念於身受心法之相,乃以智慧觀其不淨、無常、苦、空、無我,於循身觀而「亦無身覺,以不可得故」。
其二,菩薩修道品而不取涅槃——本品異於聲聞之樞。聲聞法中觀四念處,得煖、頂、忍、世間第一法乃至四果之果報;菩薩則於是觀中「不忘本願,不捨大悲」,雖修三十七品而不取涅槃。論主釋其所以不取,云「本願牢故,大悲心深入故」〔T25 0405c24〕,而以七住地夢中縛栰之喻明之:菩薩中流而覺、欲自滅倒心時,「十方佛伸手摩頭」〔T25 0406a01〕,勸其念本願、以空法教化眾生。是同一四念處,聲聞取以證滅、菩薩行以度生,其分野正在般若所攝之本願大悲。
其三,四十二字門會歸畢竟空,即是般若。字門之立,因字有語、因語有名、因名有義〔T25 0408b12〕;然菩薩分別破散諸字,則言語空、名空、義空,論主明其歸,云「得畢竟空,即是般若波羅蜜」〔T25 0409b10〕。四十二字首於阿字「一切法初不生故」〔T25 0407c11〕、終於「過荼無字可得」〔T25 0408a13〕,一一以「不可得」立義,正是諸法實相之異門。是三十七道品、四十二字門種種法數,皆以「以不可得故」為其末後,同歸般若,「如是等種種分別,是名『菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍』」〔T25 0409c14〕——是本品般若義眼之所歸。
六、諸家異釋
古德引釋本品者,此目誌錄其所疏、所引與本品之對應,不判各家詮釋。本品古德之網:吉藏《大品經義疏》逐文直疏,二讀者單元皆有實質內容,字門一段尤詳;慧影《大智度論疏》現存殘卷於本品付之闕如,全品落於疏卷之物理缺口;均正《大乘四論玄義》屬教理引證型,於本品無直接引用,僅一則鄰近〈發趣品〉之道品覆述引。
吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451)疏本品約一頁半篇幅,二讀者單元皆有實質義疏,較前〈摩訶衍品〉之覆蓋為勻(該品單元二百八三昧僅一句帶過),本品字門一段反尤詳具。其一,品題與卷首品目皆沿 T223 底本之名。逐文疏品題作「廣乘品第十九」〔X24 0247a23〕,並自注「文句一二如此,疏皆無異也」——吉藏意識本品內容分兩段落,聲明其疏對兩段之處理無異,其全篇以「廣乘品」稱本品,與 T223 底本題名一致,非本論之「四念處品」。其二,單元一(四念處)有實質科判。吉藏就內外身分別(自身妻子財物為內外、眼等五情為內身)、三十七道品體系(云「三十七道品門」并舉十力、四無畏等〔X24 0247c07〕)、十八不共法逐條、九相十想之辨,皆有內容之逐文疏,與論①內外身定義、經②道品列名相呼應。其三,單元二(字門)疏尤詳。吉藏於四十二字門起云「四十二字辨大乘一切名」〔X24 0248a02〕,辨字陀羅尼與五百陀羅尼之關係、立字語名義之教理鏈云「因字有語,因語有名,因名有義」〔X24 0248a14〕(與論②〔T25 0408b12〕義理相通),復明「字等、語等」之義〔X24 0248b01〕。是吉藏對本品之覆蓋,兩單元皆有實質義疏,字門一段之詳反過於前品之相應處。
慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791)於本品逐文疏零命中,全品落於現存殘卷之物理缺口。本目遍檢慧影疏,未見任何本品之逐文疏品名容器;核校其疏卷第十七收卷〔X46 0875c19〕之後,下一存卷直跳至疏卷第二十一,疏卷十八、十九、二十(涵蓋本品所在之論本卷四十八)全部佚失,本品完整落於此缺口內。此零命中與前〈摩訶衍品〉同屬此一已知缺卷區間之連續確證。同名陷阱之辨(本目誌錄):慧影疏卷第十七(缺口之前)確有一段實質討論四十二字陀羅尼教理之文字,云「四十二字亦入一阿字」等〔X46 0866b18〕;然核校此段所疏之論本出處,實為本論品一〈序品〉龐大論釋內先略提之四十二字段(論本卷二十五附近),非本品十九之字門段——本論同一教理(四十二字陀羅尼)於全書出現不只一處(品一序品先略提、品十九本品方詳展),若不核其所疏之卷品範圍,易將慧影對品一段落之疏誤認為對本品之疏。本目已核實排除此同名陷阱,誌慧影對四十二字教理確有討論,惟非本品十九之逐文疏,維持零命中之誠實結論。
均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784)為教理系統性論書,非逐文注疏體,於本品無直接引用。本目遍檢,僅得一則鄰近品之引用:均正引「故大品經第五卷發趣品最末云:菩薩摩訶薩行六波羅蜜、四念處乃至十八不共法」〔X46 0573a06〕——此明標「發趣品」(T223 品二十,本品之次品),所引為〈發趣品〉對六波羅蜜、四念處乃至十八不共法一組道品之摘要覆述語,與本品十九經②之詳列(四念處、四正勤乃至十八不共法逐一展開)為同一教理系譜而非同一文字出處。且均正稱其為第五卷,而核 T223 經文,〈發趣品〉實始於卷六開卷,卷次標注不吻合,未能於本目釐清(或均正所據為別種分卷),誌錄不判。是均正對本品(無論以「四念處品」或「廣乘品」為名)無直接逐字引用,僅有一則鄰近〈發趣品〉之道品覆述引,此為誠實之零直接命中記錄。
(附辨·同名之防):以「四念處」立題之天台一系著述(智顗等)以四念處為修觀之綱要,同名而甚多,然皆天台自宗之觀行論述,非本論品十九之逐文疏,同名而不相涉,本目辨其非本品之古德疏,誌以防混,不涉判釋。
七、互讀與承衍
本品之骨有二——四念處為三十七道品之首、諸道品字門同歸般若之無所得——皆為本論前後文及古德所承。
其一,本論內部之自繫。論主釋本品諸道品法數,屢自標其所本,以「如先說」「如初品中說」帶過而回指更早之品次。釋安那般那,云「安那般那義,如先說」〔T25 0404b14〕;釋三十七品之總義,云「三十七品論議,如先說」〔T25 0405c22〕;釋三三昧、十一智、三無漏根等,云「復次,三三昧、十一智、三無漏根…如先說」〔T25 0406a09〕;釋佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法,云「…如初品中說」〔T25 0406a11〕;論②釋二十功德中五眾等義,亦云「五眾等義如先說」〔T25 0409b21〕。是本品道品法數之廣義,論主自繫於本論初品及前文之廣說,其互讀之明文皆論主自立。
其二,摩訶衍體用之義為前後品及古德所承。本品「四念處…是名菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」之句式,直承前〈摩訶衍品〉「六波羅蜜是菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」之開列衍體之程式——前品列六度、十八空、百八三昧為衍體,本品續列三十七道品、四十二字門為衍,同一「所謂…是名菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」之相承。其下傳:本品四十二字門之教理,吉藏《大品經義疏》以「四十二字辨大乘一切名」〔X24 0248a02〕直承而疏之,其疏反尤詳;本品經②之道品系列,均正《大乘四論玄義》所引〈發趣品〉之道品覆述〔X46 0573a06〕即與此同一系譜(誌其引不判)。慧影疏於本品之佚失(第六目),則為此義理下傳之鏈於現存文本中之一斷處,誠實並誌。此諸承衍在於義脈之相續,各家所取隨其宗趣,本目誌其相承而不代為定讀,所繫諸出處皆見第五目、第六目逐字之載。
八、校本與版本說明
本品校勘可與經義相涉者,擇要如下;異本讀法並列保存,正文仍從現行底本讀法。本品全落卷四十八單卷之內(不跨卷),有二重須先誌之特殊格局——宮本於本卷現存可校(與前〈摩訶衍品〉之上半卷四十六宮本整卷缺席適相反)、石本品次負一與卷次正二之雙軌偏移(品題起點完全確證、卷末收尾出現未消解之異常),二事詳本目末段。
0402c14(品題·兩造傳本雙向互證):大智度論釋四念處品第十九【大】|釋四念處品第十九經作廣乘品【明】|第十九品釋廣乘品【宮】|釋第十八品【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第十八四念處品卷五十【石】(note0402020)——本論一系中,大正底本題「四念處品」,明本附注「經作廣乘品」(直指所釋經之題名),宮本逕題「廣乘品」(品次仍第十九,惟品名捨「四念處」而從「廣乘」,與所釋經 T223 底本自題「廣乘品」一致),聖本作「釋第十八品」(品次較大正少一),石本題「品第十八…卷五十」(品次少一、卷次多二,詳本目末段)。與所釋經 T223 之品題形成雙向對照——T223 大正底本題「廣乘品第十九」〔T08 0253b17〕,其品題容器內丹本注記「丹本名為四念處品」(T08 0253b18 丹本夾注)(直指本論之題名)。是兩造各自內部之異文各指對方之讀,構成雙向互證之閉環(詳第四目)。正文從底本「四念處品」。
0409c16(卷末題記·宮本省略附加語):釋第十九品【大】|〔-〕【宮】(note0409030)——卷四十八收尾題記「大智度論卷第四十八釋第十九品」之「釋第十九品」四字,宮本省略。與宮本於品題逕作「廣乘品」(其品名自足,不更綴大正之品題)之邏輯一致,非缺席。正文從底本。
0409c16(卷末·石本卷次收尾異常·未消解):四十八【大】|十五【石】(note0409029)——卷末題記「卷第四十八」之卷次數字,石本作「十五」。此讀與同卷品題起點石本自報之「卷五十」(卷次正二)不相一致(同一卷四十八,起題石本作「五十」、卷末石本作「十五」,二處石本卷次座標自相牴牾);本目未能考定其成因(「五十」「十五」是否轉錄或刊刻之互倒,無旁證可據,不強行判定),誠實記為未消解之異常,不強行納入既有偏移框架,供後續以石經更完整本覆核。正文從底本「四十八」。
0409c16(卷末·石本品次收尾·聖負一吻合/石缺十字):十九品【大】|十八品【聖】|八品竟【石】(note0409031)——卷末「釋第十九品」之品次,聖本作「十八品」(品次負一,與其於品題「釋第十八品」方向一致);石本作「八品竟」,較大正「十九品」少一「十」字。正文從底本「十九品」。
0406a21(四正勤·勤/懃字形):勤【T25n1509】|懃【T08n0223】——經②「所謂四正勤」之「勤」,所釋經 T223 同處作「四正懃」〔T08 0254b12〕。二字皆訓勤勉,屬同譯者兩部用字之字形變體,非義理歧異,誌錄不判。正文從本論底本「勤」。
0407b23(四無礙智·礙/閡字形):礙【T25n1509】|閡【T08n0223】——經②「四無礙智」之「礙」,T223 通篇作「閡」(義無閡、法無閡、辭無閡、樂說無閡)〔T08 0255c20 附近〕,為兩部一致之字形差異,非個別誤植,誌錄不判。正文從本論底本「礙」。
0406c09(三根第三·知者根/智者根):知者根【T25n1509】|智者根【T08n0223】——三根之第三,本論作「知者根」,T223 作「智者根」〔T08 0255a05〕。「知者」(已知之無學位)與「智者」義理同指無學位階,未判孰為原譯,誌錄不判。正文從本論底本「知者根」。
0406c25(十念第七·念滅/念善·三方確證):滅【T25n1509】|善【T08n0223 底本】/滅【T08n0223 聖本】(T08 note0255003)——十念之第七,本論作「念滅」,所釋經 T223 大正底本作「念善」,而 T223 之聖本異文正作「念滅」(T08 note0255003「善【大】,滅【聖】」)。是本論底本與 T223 聖本二證皆讀「滅」,惟 T223 大正所據底本獨作「善」;「念滅」即隨念寂滅,於十隨念傳統中為常見一目。本目依紀律誌其三方分佈,不代為判定,正文從本論底本「念滅」。
0407c11起(經列名層)/0408b14起(論釋層)(四十二字門·經、論兩層八處用字不一·本論 T25n1509 自身經、論兩層之異,逐字核校,誌不臆改):四十二字入門,經先列名(「阿字門,一切法初不生故」等),論次逐一釋名並附秦言訓詁(如「若聞羅字,即隨義知一切法離垢相」,復注「羅闍,秦言垢」)。以字序位對比,經列名層與論釋層有八處用字不同——其一,經第十七作「磨」〔0407c23〕、論作「摩」〔0408c07〕;其二,經第十九作「他」〔0407c24〕、論作「陀」〔0408c09〕;其三,經第二十一作「簸」〔0407c26〕、論作「濕波」〔0408c12〕;其四,經第二十八作「拖」〔0408a01〕、論作「他」〔0408c21〕;其五,經第三十一作「魔」〔0408a04〕、論作「濕尛」〔0408c25〕;其六,經第三十五作「咃」〔0408a07〕、論作「他」〔0409a05〕;其七,經第四十一作「咤」〔0408a11〕、論作「吒」〔0409a12〕;其八,經第四十二作「荼」〔0408a12〕、論作「茶」〔0409a14〕。 其中第二十一(簸/濕波)、第三十一(魔/濕尛)為單字與複合音節之別——論以「濕波」「濕尛」複合音節詳注其實讀(子音叢集之音),經以單字略記,二者非牴牾而係略記與詳注同一梵音之兩式;餘六處則近音或形近之字詞游移。此八處皆本論自身經、論兩層措辭之異,非跨傳本異文、非搜尋失誤,誌錄以存其實,不代臆改。
0407c26/0408c12(簸字·校勘旁證):經列名層「簸」字,宋、宮、聖三本作異體「𤿺」(note0407032「簸【大】下同,𤿺【宋】【宮】【聖】下同」);論釋層「濕簸字無義,故不釋」句之「簸」,宋、元、明、宮、聖、石六本皆作「波」(note0408042「簸【大】,波【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】」)——多數傳本於論釋層此處讀「濕波」而非大正獨有之「濕簸」,益顯經(簸)、論(濕波)兩層用字之別。誌錄不判,正文從底本。
0408c25(濕尛字·校勘旁證):論釋層「濕尛」之「尛」,宋、元、明、宮四本作「麼」(note0408051「尛【大】下同,麼【宋】【元】【明】【宮】下同」)——與第二十一(簸/濕波)同型,此第三十一(魔/濕尛)之複合音節字,論釋層亦有多數傳本之異讀,二例並見,益證經、論兩層用字之別非孤例。經列名層「魔」字〔0408a04〕該處無校記。誌錄不判,正文從底本「尛」。
本品單卷之二重特殊格局,並誌如下。其一,宮本於本卷(卷四十八·品十九全品)現存可校。本目逐條核校卷四十八全段之校勘記(凡二百四十三條),未見任何此卷宮本缺之聲明;且其中九十九條明列宮本為傳本(含宮本自身之異讀,如品題逕作「廣乘品」〔note0402020〕、卷末省略「釋第十九品」〔note0409030〕),確證宮本於卷四十八逐字可校、並非缺席。前〈摩訶衍品〉因跨卷四十六、四十七而一半落入宮缺、一半否;本品全落卷四十八單卷,宮本全程現存——此界須明誌,勿誤襲前品之宮缺判。其二,石本品次負一與卷次正二之雙軌偏移,於品題起點完全確證、於卷末收尾出現未消解之異常。品題起點〔0402c14〕石本自報「摩訶般若波羅蜜品第十八…卷五十」——品次十八較大正第十九少一、卷次五十較大正四十八多二,與前〈摩訶衍品〉及更前二品(品十六、十七)已見之品次負一、卷次正二型態一致,獲第四例連續確證。然卷末收尾〔0409c16附近〕石本兩處座標與此型態不盡吻合:卷次石本作十五(note0409029,非五十)、品次石本作八品竟(note0409031,缺一十字)——本目誠實並存此二異常,不強行化約入既有偏移量,亦不迴避,供後續以石經更完整本覆核。此為既有石本雙軌偏移型態首次於收尾端遇不完全吻合之資料點。
本品全帙校勘記,扣除品題校記與上列諸條外,餘多屬虛詞增減、同音或形近假借、音譯詳略之技術性異文,逐條核校未見義理層改變,故不逐條展開,僅統計性帶過。本品底本為《大智度論》卷四十八全品〔T25 0402c14–0409c15〕,範圍終點取次品〈發趣品第二十〉起題(0409c23),不含。所釋經校本為《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》〈廣乘品第十九〉(T08n0223·品題大正底本讀「廣乘品」、丹本注「四念處品」)。古德疏校本為吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451·二讀者單元皆有實質科判、字門一段尤詳、沿「廣乘品」名),別有慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791·本品逐文疏佚於疏卷十八至二十之殘卷缺口、有同名陷阱之品一序品字門段須辨)、均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784·無本品直接引用、僅一則鄰近〈發趣品〉之道品覆述引)。異讀校記依大正校勘,涉大正底本與宋、元、明、宮、聖、石諸本之異。本品全帙校勘記詳存工作底本;本表僅傳錄與本品核心義理措辭相涉之要目,不延伸為各本高下之判。
I. Structural Placement
Within the sequence in which the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa comments on the Larger Sūtra, this chapter belongs to the section of the Commentary on the Remaining Chapters, and the treatise gives its own title as 「大智度論釋四念處品第十九」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness, the Nineteenth"〔T25 0402c14〕. The whole chapter in fact lies within the single Fascicle 48 and does not cross fascicles. It has been divided into two reader units, and the cutting point〔T25 0406a15〕falls on the natural seam between the closing sentence of Treatise ① and the opening sentence of Sūtra ②. Unlike the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna", whose cut happens to coincide with a physical fascicle boundary, the cut in this chapter is purely a boundary of length for the reader, tied to the transition between sections within the sūtra and the treatise themselves.
The chapter's framework of sūtra and treatise is two Sūtra sections and two Treatise sections in succession—Sūtra ①〔T25 0402c18〕, Treatise ①〔T25 0403c04〕, Sūtra ②〔T25 0406a15〕, Treatise ②〔T25 0408b01〕—neither a single Sūtra section with a single Treatise section, nor spanning fascicles. Unit One, "The Four Foundations of Mindfulness": Sūtra ① begins at〔T25 0402c18〕with 「佛告須菩提」 tr. "the Buddha told Subhūti"; the Buddha establishes the four foundations of mindfulness as the bodhisattva's Mahāyāna, unfolds the twelve kinds of contemplation of the foundation of mindfulness of the body (walking, standing, sitting, and lying down; the in-and-out breath; contemplating the four great elements; the impurity of the thirty-six things; the nine perceptions of the corpse, down to the white bones like a conch shell), and briefly raises the three foundations of mindfulness of feeling, mind, and dharmas. Treatise ① begins at〔T25 0403c04〕with 「問曰:四念處中有種種觀」 tr. "Question: within the four foundations of mindfulness there are various kinds of contemplation"; with ten questions and ten answers it explains the name and meaning of the four foundations of mindfulness, the distinction between inner and outer, contemplation following the body and not giving rise to the notion of a body, diligent vigour with a single mind, the removal of worldly covetousness and grief, and other items, and it closes with a transition on the mutual inclusion of the thirty-seven limbs of the path, ending at the closing sentence of Treatise ①〔T25 0406a13〕, 「是諸法後皆用無所得故」 tr. "all these dharmas afterwards all employ 'because there is nothing to be attained'." Unit Two, "The Limbs of the Path and the Syllable-Gates": Sūtra ② begins at〔T25 0406a15〕, continuing the close of the nine perceptions of the foundation of mindfulness of the body (after many years the colour is like a dove's; it merges with the earth); it sums up the three foundations of mindfulness of feeling, mind, and dharmas, and then lists the remaining limbs of the path—the four right efforts, the four divisions of the bases of supernormal power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven limbs of awakening, the eight limbs of the noble path, the three samādhi, the eleven knowledges, the three faculties, the ten recollections, the various meditative absorptions, the ten powers of the Buddha, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, and the eighteen unshared dharmas—and it closes with the forty-two syllable-gates of entry and the twenty merits, ending at the closing sentence of Sūtra ②〔T25 0408a28〕, 「是陀羅尼門、阿字門等,是名菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」 tr. "these dhāraṇī-gates, the gate of the syllable a, and the rest—these are called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna." Treatise ② begins at〔T25 0408b01〕with 「釋曰」 tr. "Explanation:"; it explains the meaning of 「字等、語等」 tr. "the sameness of syllables, the sameness of speech", explains the forty-two syllables one by one with glosses in the language of Qin attached, and further sets up questions and answers to explain the twenty merits, closing with the final sentence of the whole chapter〔T25 0409c14〕, 「如是等種種分別,是名『菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍』」 tr. "all such distinctions as these are called 'the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna'."
The inscriptions at the head of a fascicle vary with the division into fascicles. This chapter is the first chapter of Fascicle 48: after the chapter title 「大智度論釋四念處品第十九」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness, the Nineteenth" come the author and translator inscriptions 「龍樹菩薩造」 tr. "composed by the bodhisattva Nāgārjuna"〔T25 0402c16〕 and 「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」 tr. "translated by Kumārajīva, Tripiṭaka master of the kingdom of Kucha, of the Later Qin"〔T25 0402c17〕, in accord with the convention that a unit which crosses into or opens a fascicle carries the inscriptions at the fascicle head. Unit Two〔T25 0406a15〕 lies in the middle of Fascicle 48, continuing on from the preceding sūtra text, and has neither chapter title nor author and translator inscriptions. This is exactly the reverse of the distribution of inscriptions in the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna" (there Unit One is the second chapter within Fascicle 46 and has no inscriptions, while Unit Two is the head of Fascicle 47 and has them); in both chapters the presence or absence of the inscriptions depends on the unit's position within the physical fascicle, and each is structurally correct in its own right.
The chapter name has, among the transmitted texts, a layer of alternative naming that must be distinguished first. The Taishō base text of this treatise titles it 「四念處品」 tr. "Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness"; the Ming edition appends the note 「經作廣乘品」 tr. "the sūtra has 'Chapter on the Broad Vehicle'"; the Palace edition titles it outright 「廣乘品」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle"; and the Ishiyama text reports its own chapter number as the eighteenth and its own fascicle number as fifty (chapter number minus one, fascicle number plus two). The sūtra explained, the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra translated by Kumārajīva of the Later Qin, at the same position titles it 「廣乘品第十九」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle, the Nineteenth"〔T08 0253b17〕, and within the container of that chapter title there is a separate Khitan-edition note marking that in the Khitan edition this chapter is the Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness (T08 0253b18 Khitan-edition interlinear note). The two works both come from Kumārajīva's hand, and the two readings, 'Four Foundations of Mindfulness' and 'Broad Vehicle', each leave within the other's text collation variants that point to each other, forming a closed loop of two-way mutual attestation (details in Sections IV and VIII; this is the second instance of cross-attestation of chapter titles among the chapters in which this treatise explains the Larger Sūtra, the first being the two readings 'Mahāyāna' and 'Asking about the Vehicle' in the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna"). In this section and in the reader-facing main text below, the chapter is uniformly called "The Four Foundations of Mindfulness", following this treatise's own title; the other names are recorded without judgement.
The collation of this chapter has two special configurations that must be noted first; both are detailed in Section VIII, and this section first marks that they exist. First, the Palace edition survives for this fascicle (Fascicle 48, the whole of Chapter 19) and can be collated item by item—exactly the reverse of the first half of the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna" (Fascicle 46), where the Palace edition is absent for the whole fascicle; the previous chapter's judgement that the Palace edition is missing must not be carried over. Second, the double-track displacement of the Ishiyama text—chapter number minus one and fascicle number plus two—is fully confirmed at the starting point of the chapter title (a fourth consecutive confirmation), but at the close at the end of the fascicle two unresolved anomalies appear (the Ishiyama text reads the fascicle number as fifteen, and reads the chapter number as 'eight chapters ended', lacking a 'ten'). This section records them honestly as unresolved points of doubt and does not force them into the existing displacement framework.
II. Terms Examined
The four foundations of mindfulness (first of the thirty-seven limbs of the path; one of the chapter's lifelines). This is what the chapter's name rests on. The sūtra takes the four foundations of mindfulness as the first of the bodhisattva's Mahāyāna, saying 「所謂四念處」 tr. "namely, the four foundations of mindfulness"〔T25 0402c18〕; it opens the four foundations of body, feeling, mind, and dharmas, unfolds twelve kinds of contemplation under the foundation of mindfulness of the body, and ties each to 「循身觀,亦無身覺,以不可得故」 tr. "contemplating following the body, yet also without the notion of a body, because it is unfindable." The treatise-author distinguishes its name and meaning: asked why it says 「念處」 tr. "foundation of mindfulness" and not 「智處」 tr. "foundation of knowledge", he answers 「初習行時,未及有智;念為初門」 tr. "when one first practises, one has not yet come to have knowledge; mindfulness is the first gate"〔T25 0405c03〕, and he points out its real substance, saying 「四念處實體是智慧」 tr. "the real substance of the four foundations of mindfulness is wisdom"〔T25 0405c04〕—mindfulness is the gate of first entry, while its real substance is wisdom; contemplating the inner and outer body is itself wisdom, and mindfulness holds wisdom within its object and does not let it scatter, hence the name 「念處」 tr. "foundation of mindfulness." The treatise further explains that 「循身觀」 tr. "contemplating following the body"〔T25 0404a11〕 means searching along and observing its impurity, and that 「不生身覺」 tr. "not giving rise to the notion of a body"〔T25 0404a15〕 means not grasping the marks of the body's oneness or difference and so giving rise to idle discourse.
The thirty-seven limbs of the path (encompassed by the four foundations of mindfulness; the divisions of wisdom, vigour, and concentration). The four foundations of mindfulness are the first of the thirty-seven limbs of the path; the other limbs of the path all take the four foundations of mindfulness as their substance, each with its own predominance. The treatise-author makes their divisions clear, saying 「四正勤、四如意足,雖各各別位,皆在四念處中」 tr. "the four right efforts and the four bases of supernormal power, though each has its own separate position, are all within the four foundations of mindfulness"〔T25 0405b28〕, and further judges their predominance, saying 「慧多故,名『四念處』;精進多故,名『四正勤』;定多故,名『四如意足』」 tr. "because wisdom predominates, they are called 'the four foundations of mindfulness'; because vigour predominates, they are called 'the four right efforts'; because concentration predominates, they are called 'the four bases of supernormal power'"〔T25 0405b29〕—in the four foundations of mindfulness wisdom predominates, in the four right efforts vigour predominates, in the four bases of supernormal power concentration predominates: one and the same substance of the limbs of the path, named according to the dharma that is dominant. Unit Two, in the form of the Sūtra, lists one by one by name the numbered dharmas of the limbs of the path—the four right efforts up to the eight limbs of the noble path, the three samādhi, the eleven knowledges, the three faculties, and the ten recollections—each crowned with 「以不可得故」 tr. "because it is unfindable" and returned to the Mahāyāna.
The forty-two syllable-gates of entry (dhāraṇī; the lifeline of Unit Two). This is the backbone of Unit Two, and also one of the passages with the largest number of characters in the whole chapter. The sūtra first establishes 「字等、語等諸字入門」 tr. "the gates of entry into all syllables, the sameness of syllables and the sameness of speech"〔T25 0407c10〕 and sets out the forty-two syllable-gates one by one, beginning with 「阿字門,一切法初不生故」 tr. "the gate of the syllable a, because all dharmas are from the first unarisen"〔T25 0407c11〕 and ending with 「過荼無字可得」 tr. "beyond ḍha there is no syllable to be obtained"〔T25 0408a13〕, forty-two gates in all, each establishing its meaning by unfindability (for example, the syllable a, that all dharmas are from the first unarisen; the syllable ra, that all dharmas are free of defilement). The treatise-author explains why, saying 「四十二字是一切字根本」 tr. "the forty-two syllables are the root of all syllables"〔T25 0408b12〕, and establishes how syllable, speech, name, and meaning arise from one another, saying 「因字有語,因語有名,因名有義」 tr. "from syllables there is speech, from speech there are names, from names there is meaning"〔T25 0408b12〕—if the bodhisattva hears a single syllable, then following its meaning he penetrates the real mark of all dharmas. The treatise further explains the forty-two syllables one by one, with glosses in the language of Qin attached (ādi, in the language of Qin 'beginning'; anutpāda, in the language of Qin 'not arising'; and so on).
'Because it is unfindable' (the seal by which prajñā gathers in the limbs of the path; running through the whole chapter). In this chapter the twelve contemplations of the foundation of mindfulness of the body, each item of the thirty-seven limbs of the path in Unit Two, the forty-two syllable-gates of entry, and even the twenty merits all take 「以不可得故」 tr. "because it is unfindable" as their closing stroke. This is not a phrase added separately from outside the limbs of the path; rather, prajñā's seal of nothing to be attained is set on all the limbs of the path and syllable-gates, so that the contemplation following the body in the four foundations of mindfulness is 「亦無身覺」 tr. "also without the notion of a body", and so that the cultivation of the limbs of the path does not cling to agent and object. It is the common seal of all the numbered dharmas of this chapter, and also the pivot on which they return to prajñā (see Section V).
III. Similes and Stories
The Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa is renowned for its similes. The lifeline of this chapter's teaching lies in the several similes the sūtra itself sets up for the foundation of mindfulness of the body, and in the linked similes the treatise-author unfolds when explaining the four foundations of mindfulness and the twenty merits. All are tied to contemplating the body as impure, and to gathering practice with wisdom without clinging.
First, the three similes of the sūtra itself for the foundation of mindfulness of the body (Unit One, sūtra). To make clear the knowing of the long and short in-and-out breath, the sūtra sets up the simile of the turner, saying 「譬如旋師,若旋師弟子,繩長知長,繩短知短」 tr. "just as a turner, or a turner's apprentice, when the cord is long knows it is long, and when the cord is short knows it is short"〔T25 0403a08〕—as one who works a potter's turning wheel is perfectly clear about the length of the cord, so the bodhisattva knows the length of the in-and-out breath. To make clear the analysis of the body into the four great elements, the treatise explains the sūtra's simile of the cattle-butcher, saying 「『牛』即是行者身,『屠兒』即是行者,『刀』是利智慧」 tr. "'the ox' is the practitioner's body, 'the butcher' is the practitioner, 'the knife' is sharp wisdom"〔T25 0404b25〕—with the knife of sharp wisdom one divides the body into the four great elements of earth, water, fire, and wind, as the butcher divides the ox into four parts, and there is no ox besides. To make clear the impurity of the thirty-six things, the treatise explains the sūtra's simile of the granary, saying 「穀倉是身,農夫是行者」 tr. "the granary is the body, the farmer is the practitioner"〔T25 0404c08〕—as a clear-eyed farmer who opens the granary at once distinguishes rice, hemp, millet, and grain, so the practitioner who opens the granary of the body with the wisdom eye at once knows that it is full of impurity.
Second, the similes of vigour in the treatise's explanation of the four foundations of mindfulness (Unit One, treatise). Explaining 「勤精進一心」 tr. "diligent vigour with a single mind", it sets up the simile of drilling the fire-stick to seek fire, saying 「譬如攢燧求火,一心勤著,不休不息,乃可得火」 tr. "just as in drilling the fire-stick to seek fire, one applies oneself diligently with a single mind, without pause and without rest, and only then can one obtain fire"〔T25 0404a26〕—drilling wood to take fire succeeds only with a single mind that does not rest; the difficulty of leaving one's own body and leaving one's own mind cannot be overcome without diligent vigour with a single mind. Explaining 「除世間貪憂」 tr. "removing worldly covetousness and grief", it sets up the simile of splitting bamboo, saying 「猶如破竹,初節既破,餘節皆去」 tr. "just like splitting bamboo: once the first joint is split, the remaining joints all go"〔T25 0404a28〕—when covetousness is removed, the five hindrances all go, as when the first joint of the bamboo is split and the remaining joints all give way before the blade. Explaining the falseness of worldly pleasure, it sets up the simile of fine food mixed with poison, saying 「譬如美食雜毒,食雖香美,毒則害人」 tr. "just like fine food mixed with poison: though the food is fragrant and delicious, the poison harms a person"〔T25 0405a28〕—worldly pleasure is like fine food mixed with poison; it is taken as pleasure only because for a while it screens off suffering, and beyond measure it gives rise to limitless suffering.
Third, the story-simile of the bodhisattva who does not grasp nirvāṇa (Unit One, treatise). The treatise-author, explaining why the bodhisattva cultivates the thirty-seven limbs yet does not grasp nirvāṇa, unfolds the simile of binding a raft in a dream at the seventh abode-stage, saying 「如人夢中縛栰渡河,中流而覺」 tr. "like a person who in a dream binds a raft to cross a river and wakes in midstream"〔T25 0405c27〕—the bodhisattva who reaches the seventh abode-stage, contemplating outwardly that all dharmas are empty and inwardly that there is no self, is like a person who in a dream binds a raft to cross a river and wakes in midstream; thinking 「我空自疲苦,無河無栰」 tr. "I have wearied and pained myself for nothing; there is no river and no raft", he wishes to extinguish his own inverted mind. At that moment 「十方佛伸手摩頭」 tr. "the Buddhas of the ten directions stretch out their hands and stroke his head"〔T25 0406a01〕, urging him not to give rise to regret, to remember his original vow, and to teach and transform beings with this dharma of emptiness. This linked story is the key point at which the bodhisattva path of this chapter differs from the śrāvaka's grasping of realisation (see Section V). The simile of splitting bamboo appears again in Unit Two, where the treatise explains 「得陀羅尼」 tr. "attaining dhāraṇī" among the twenty merits, saying 「譬如破竹,初節既破,餘者皆易」 tr. "just like splitting bamboo: once the first joint is split, the rest are all easy"〔T25 0409b13〕—when the syllable-dhāraṇī is attained, all the dhāraṇīs are attained of themselves; it works by the same mechanism as the bamboo simile for 「除貪憂」 tr. "removing covetousness and grief" in Unit One, but is put to a different use.
IV. The Sūtra Passage Explained
The Sūtra sections cited by this treatise correspond item by item with Chapter 19, "The Broad Vehicle", of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra translated by Kumārajīva of the Later Qin. Below they are aligned word for word, to prove that what the treatise explains is indeed the sūtra text of this version; at the places where its two Treatise sections are inserted, one sees especially that the backbone of this chapter's doctrine lies in the treatise.
First group: the closed loop of two-way mutual attestation of the alternative chapter names (the pivot of this chapter's Section IV; each of the two transmissions points to the other; the second instance in the series). The Taishō base text of this treatise〔T25 0402c14〕 titles it 「大智度論釋四念處品第十九」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness, the Nineteenth", and its Ming-edition variant note reads 「經作廣乘品」 tr. "the sūtra has 'Chapter on the Broad Vehicle'"—the Ming edition itself marks 「經作廣乘品」 tr. "the sūtra has 'Chapter on the Broad Vehicle'", pointing directly to the title of the sūtra explained; its Palace edition goes further and titles it outright 「廣乘品」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle" (the chapter number still the nineteenth; only the chapter name abandons 「四念處」 tr. "the four foundations of mindfulness" and follows 「廣乘」 tr. "the broad vehicle"). The Taishō base text of the sūtra explained, T223〔T08 0253b17〕, titles it 「廣乘品第十九」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle, the Nineteenth", and within the container of that chapter title there is a separate Khitan-edition note, 「丹本名為四念處品」 tr. "the Khitan edition names it 'Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness'" (T08 0253b18 Khitan-edition interlinear note)—a Khitan variant within T223 itself, pointing directly to this treatise's title. Thus in these two works, both from Kumārajīva, the two readings 'Four Foundations of Mindfulness' and 'Broad Vehicle' each leave within the other's text a cross-reference at the level of collation witnesses, forming a closed loop that is cross-textual, two-way, and mutually attesting (this is the second instance of cross-attestation of chapter titles at the level of collation witnesses among the chapters in which this treatise explains the Larger Sūtra, of the same type as the two readings 'Mahāyāna' and 'Asking about the Vehicle' in the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna"). The Ishiyama text, for its part, titles it 「品第十八…卷五十」 tr. "Chapter Eighteen … Fascicle Fifty" (chapter number minus one; see Section VIII).
Second group: the general heading of the four foundations of mindfulness is almost wholly identical word for word. This treatise's〔T25 0402c18〕 「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍,所謂四念處」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna, namely, the four foundations of mindfulness" and T223's〔T08 0253b19〕 「菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍,所謂四念處」 tr. "the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna, namely, the four foundations of mindfulness" correspond word for word (the punctuation too being almost wholly identical). Below them, the twelve kinds of contemplation of the foundation of mindfulness of the body (walking, standing, sitting, and lying down; the in-and-out breath; contemplating the four great elements; the thirty-six things; the nine perceptions) also correspond item by item in the two texts, except that at the start of contemplating following the body within the inner body T223 uses a plain declarative sentence, while this treatise uses the interrogative form 「云何內身中循身觀」 tr. "how does one, within the inner body, contemplate following the body?"—a difference at the level of narration, while the content still corresponds.
Third group: the close of the nine perceptions and the sentence summing up feeling, mind, and dharmas—confirming that the unit cut is, in T223 too, a division within the sūtra text itself. The opening sentence of this treatise's Sūtra ②〔T25 0406a15〕, 「見是棄死人骨在地,歲久,其色如鴿」 tr. "seeing the bones of this discarded dead person on the ground, after many years their colour like a dove's", and T223 at the same place〔T08 0254b09〕, 「歲久,其色如鴿,腐朽爛壞,與土共合」 tr. "after many years their colour like a dove's, rotting, decaying, and breaking down, merging with the earth", are nearly identical word for word. In the sentence below that sums up the three foundations, this treatise's〔T25 0406a20〕 「受念處、心念處、法念處亦應如是廣說」 tr. "the foundation of mindfulness of feeling, the foundation of mindfulness of mind, and the foundation of mindfulness of dharmas should likewise be explained at length in this way" and T223's〔T08 0254b13〕 「外身、內外身亦如是,受念處、心念處、法念處亦應如是廣說」 tr. "the outer body and the inner-and-outer body are likewise so; the foundation of mindfulness of feeling, the foundation of mindfulness of mind, and the foundation of mindfulness of dharmas should likewise be explained at length in this way" correspond word for word. Thus the cutting point between this treatise's two reader units (the start of Sūtra ②, tied to the close of the nine perceptions of the foundation of mindfulness of the body) is, in T223 too, the natural division in the sūtra text itself where the nine perceptions end and the listing of the limbs of the path begins; it is not a cut devised by this treatise on its own account—the unit cut agrees with the transition between sections inherent in the sūtra text.
Fourth group: both Treatise sections are insertions unique to this treatise. This chapter has two Treatise explanations—Treatise ①〔T25 0403c04–0406a13〕 (ten questions and ten answers explaining the name and meaning of the four foundations of mindfulness, inner and outer, contemplating following the body, diligent vigour, and the removal of covetousness and grief, together with the transition to the thirty-seven limbs) and Treatise ②〔T25 0408b01–0409c14〕 (explaining 「字等、語等」 tr. "the sameness of syllables, the sameness of speech", explaining the forty-two syllables one by one with the language of Qin attached, and explaining the twenty merits by question and answer)—and neither has any correspondence at all in T223. The full extent of T223's "The Broad Vehicle" coincides exactly with the union of this treatise's two Sūtra sections (at the places corresponding to Treatise ① and Treatise ② it has no treatise explanation, and simply runs on through the sections of the sūtra text itself), and both Treatise sections fall wholly outside the bounds of T223's chapter. Of the two, Treatise ② by its length (including the explanation of the names of the forty-two syllables one by one with glosses in the language of Qin, and the explanation of the twenty merits one by one) is the largest single inserted section known among the chapters in which this treatise explains the Larger Sūtra, and Treatise ① comes next—of the same type as the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna" (whose two Treatise sections are likewise both insertions unique to this treatise, while its sūtra sections all correspond to continuous, unbroken stretches of T223).
(The literal variants across transmissions and within this treatise itself—the two graphs for 'effort' in the four right efforts, the two graphs for 'obstruction' in the four unobstructed knowledges, 'the faculty of one who knows' and 'the faculty of the wise' among the three faculties, 'recollection of cessation' and 'recollection of the good' among the ten recollections, and the inconsistency, at eight places, of the characters used for the forty-two syllables between the sūtra's list of names and the treatise's explanation within this treatise itself—are all assigned to Section VIII, where each is recorded with its distribution among the transmissions, without deciding on anyone's behalf.)
V. The Prajñā Eye
The eye of this chapter lies here: the four foundations of mindfulness are the first of the thirty-seven limbs of the path; all the limbs of the path and the syllable-gates are the bodhisattva's Mahāyāna; and their cultivation, each and every one, takes 「以不可得故」 tr. "because it is unfindable" as its seal, and they return together to prajñā's nothing to be attained.
First, mindfulness is the first gate, while the real substance is wisdom. Although the four foundations of mindfulness are named by 「念」 tr. "mindfulness", the treatise-author makes clear their real substance, saying 「四念處實體是智慧」 tr. "the real substance of the four foundations of mindfulness is wisdom"〔T25 0405c04〕, and the reason 「念」 tr. "mindfulness" is set up is that 「初習行時,未及有智;念為初門」 tr. "when one first practises, one has not yet come to have knowledge; mindfulness is the first gate"〔T25 0405c03〕—mindfulness is the skilful means of first entry, and wisdom is its real substance; among the thirty-seven limbs of the path, wisdom, vigour, and concentration each have their predominance, yet they are one and the same substance of the limbs of the path〔T25 0405b28〕. Thus the contemplation cultivated in this chapter is not merely fixing mindfulness on the marks of body, feeling, mind, and dharmas; it is contemplating with wisdom their impurity, impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and non-self, so that in contemplating following the body there is 「亦無身覺,以不可得故」 tr. "also no notion of a body, because it is unfindable."
Second, the bodhisattva cultivates the limbs of the path yet does not grasp nirvāṇa—the pivot at which this chapter differs from the śrāvakas. In the śrāvaka dharma, contemplating the four foundations of mindfulness, one obtains the fruits of heat, the summit, acceptance, and the highest worldly dharma, on up to the four fruits; the bodhisattva, within this contemplation, 「不忘本願,不捨大悲」 tr. "does not forget the original vow and does not abandon great compassion", and though he cultivates the thirty-seven limbs he does not grasp nirvāṇa. The treatise-author explains why he does not grasp it, saying 「本願牢故,大悲心深入故」 tr. "because the original vow is firm, because the mind of great compassion has entered deeply"〔T25 0405c24〕, and makes this clear with the simile of binding a raft in a dream at the seventh abode-stage: when the bodhisattva wakes in midstream and wishes to extinguish his own inverted mind, 「十方佛伸手摩頭」 tr. "the Buddhas of the ten directions stretch out their hands and stroke his head"〔T25 0406a01〕, urging him to remember his original vow and to teach and transform beings with the dharma of emptiness. So with one and the same four foundations of mindfulness, the śrāvaka takes them up to realise cessation, and the bodhisattva practises them to liberate beings; the dividing line lies precisely in the original vow and great compassion gathered in by prajñā.
Third, the forty-two syllable-gates return to ultimate emptiness, which is prajñā. The syllable-gates are established thus: from syllables there is speech, from speech there are names, from names there is meaning〔T25 0408b12〕; yet when the bodhisattva analyses and breaks apart the syllables, speech is empty, names are empty, and meaning is empty, and the treatise-author makes clear where this returns, saying 「得畢竟空,即是般若波羅蜜」 tr. "attaining ultimate emptiness is precisely prajñāpāramitā"〔T25 0409b10〕. The forty-two syllables begin with the syllable a, 「一切法初不生故」 tr. "because all dharmas are from the first unarisen"〔T25 0407c11〕, and end with 「過荼無字可得」 tr. "beyond ḍha there is no syllable to be obtained"〔T25 0408a13〕, each establishing its meaning by 「不可得」 tr. "unfindable", which is precisely another gate onto the real mark of all dharmas. Thus the thirty-seven limbs of the path, the forty-two syllable-gates, and all the various numbered dharmas take 「以不可得故」 tr. "because it is unfindable" as their final word and return together to prajñā: 「如是等種種分別,是名『菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍』」 tr. "all such distinctions as these are called 'the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna'"〔T25 0409c14〕—this is where the prajñā eye of this chapter comes to rest.
VI. Divergent Readings of the Masters
This section records the ancient masters who cite or explain this chapter, and the correspondence between what they comment on or cite and this chapter; it does not judge the interpretations of the various masters. The network of ancient masters for this chapter: Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra comments directly on the text passage by passage, with substantive content for both reader units, and is especially detailed on the syllable-gate passage; the surviving fragmentary fascicles of Huiying's Commentary have nothing for this chapter, the whole chapter falling in a physical gap among the commentary's fascicles; Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises is of the type that cites for doctrinal proof, and has no direct citation of this chapter, only one citation restating the limbs of the path from the neighbouring chapter "Setting Out".
Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451) comments on this chapter at a length of about a page and a half, with substantive commentary for both reader units, its coverage more even than for the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna" (where Unit Two, the hundred and eight samādhi, is passed over in a single sentence); in this chapter the syllable-gate passage is, on the contrary, especially detailed. First, the chapter title and the chapter heading at the head of the fascicle both follow the name of the T223 base text. The passage-by-passage commentary gives the chapter title as 「廣乘品第十九」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle, the Nineteenth"〔X24 0247a23〕 and notes on its own account 「文句一二如此,疏皆無異也」 tr. "the wording of the first and the second is like this; the commentary treats them without any difference"—Jizang is aware that the content of this chapter falls into two passages, and declares that his commentary treats the two passages no differently. Throughout he calls this chapter 「廣乘品」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle", in agreement with the title of the T223 base text, not this treatise's 「四念處品」 tr. "Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness." Second, Unit One (the four foundations of mindfulness) has a substantive outline. Jizang gives passage-by-passage commentary with real content on the distinction of the inner and outer body (one's own body, wife and children, and wealth as inner and outer; the five faculties, the eye and so on, as the inner body), on the system of the thirty-seven limbs of the path (saying 「三十七道品門」 tr. "the gates of the thirty-seven limbs of the path" and also raising the ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, and so on〔X24 0247c07〕), on the eighteen unshared dharmas item by item, and on the distinction between the nine marks and the ten perceptions, echoing the definition of the inner and outer body in Treatise ① and the listing of the limbs of the path in Sūtra ②. Third, Unit Two (the syllable-gates) is commented on in especially great detail. At the start of the forty-two syllable-gates Jizang says 「四十二字辨大乘一切名」 tr. "the forty-two syllables distinguish all the names of the Great Vehicle"〔X24 0248a02〕; he distinguishes the relation between the syllable-dhāraṇī and the five hundred dhāraṇīs, and establishes the doctrinal chain of syllable, speech, name, and meaning, saying 「因字有語,因語有名,因名有義」 tr. "from syllables there is speech, from speech there are names, from names there is meaning"〔X24 0248a14〕 (in doctrine consonant with Treatise ②〔T25 0408b12〕), and further makes clear the meaning of 「字等、語等」 tr. "the sameness of syllables, the sameness of speech"〔X24 0248b01〕. Thus Jizang's coverage of this chapter has substantive commentary for both units, and on the syllable-gate passage it is, on the contrary, more detailed than at the corresponding place in the preceding chapter.
Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791) has zero hits for passage-by-passage commentary on this chapter; the whole chapter falls in a physical gap among the surviving fragmentary fascicles. This section searched the whole of Huiying's commentary and found no container of a chapter name for passage-by-passage commentary on this chapter. On checking, after the close of Fascicle 17 of the commentary〔X46 0875c19〕 the next surviving fascicle jumps directly to Fascicle 21 of the commentary; Fascicles 18, 19, and 20 of the commentary (covering Fascicle 48 of the treatise, in which this chapter lies) are all lost, and this chapter falls entirely within this gap. This zero hit, like that of the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna", is a continued confirmation of this known range of missing fascicles. Distinguishing a trap of identical names (recorded in this section): Fascicle 17 of Huiying's commentary (before the gap) does contain a passage substantively discussing the doctrine of the forty-two-syllable dhāraṇī, saying 「四十二字亦入一阿字」 tr. "the forty-two syllables also enter the single syllable a" and so on〔X46 0866b18〕; but on checking the treatise passage this commentary explains, it is in fact the forty-two-syllable passage first briefly raised within the vast treatise explanation of Chapter 1, the Introduction, of this treatise (near Fascicle 25 of the treatise), not the syllable-gate passage of this Chapter 19. The same doctrine of this treatise (the forty-two-syllable dhāraṇī) appears in more than one place in the whole book (first raised briefly in Chapter 1, the Introduction, and only unfolded in detail in this Chapter 19); if one does not check the range of fascicles and chapters being commented on, one may easily mistake Huiying's commentary on a passage of Chapter 1 for a commentary on this chapter. This section has checked and excluded this trap of identical names, noting that Huiying does indeed discuss the doctrine of the forty-two syllables, but not as passage-by-passage commentary on this Chapter 19, and it maintains the honest conclusion of zero hits.
Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784) is a systematic doctrinal treatise, not a passage-by-passage commentary, and has no direct citation of this chapter. This section searched it throughout and found only one citation from a neighbouring chapter: Junzheng cites 「故大品經第五卷發趣品最末云:菩薩摩訶薩行六波羅蜜、四念處乃至十八不共法」 tr. "hence the very end of the chapter 'Setting Out' in the fifth fascicle of the Larger Sūtra says: the bodhisattva-mahāsattva practises the six perfections, the four foundations of mindfulness, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas"〔X46 0573a06〕—this plainly marks 「發趣品」 tr. "Chapter on Setting Out" (Chapter 20 of T223, the chapter after this one), and what it cites is the summarising restatement in "Setting Out" of a set of limbs of the path, the six perfections, the four foundations of mindfulness, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas. It belongs to the same doctrinal lineage as the detailed listing in Sūtra ② of this Chapter 19 (the four foundations of mindfulness, the four right efforts, up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, unfolded one by one), but it is not the same textual source. Moreover, Junzheng calls it the fifth fascicle, whereas on checking the T223 sūtra text, "Setting Out" in fact begins at the opening of Fascicle 6; the fascicle number does not match, and this section has not been able to clear this up (perhaps Junzheng relied on a different division into fascicles); it is recorded without judgement. Thus Junzheng has no direct word-for-word citation of this chapter (whether under the name 「四念處品」 tr. "Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness" or 「廣乘品」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle"), only one citation restating the limbs of the path from the neighbouring "Setting Out"; this is an honest record of zero direct hits.
(Appended distinction: guarding against identical names.) The works of the Tiantai line (Zhiyi and others) that take 「四念處」 tr. "the four foundations of mindfulness" as their title treat the four foundations of mindfulness as the outline of cultivating contemplation; they share the name and are very numerous, but all are Tiantai's own school's expositions of contemplative practice, not passage-by-passage commentaries on Chapter 19 of this treatise; they share the name and have no bearing on it. This section distinguishes them as not being ancient-master commentaries on this chapter, recording this to prevent confusion, without entering into judgement or interpretation.
VII. Cross-reading and Further Resonances
This chapter's backbone is twofold—the four foundations of mindfulness as the first of the thirty-seven limbs of the path, and the return of all the limbs of the path and syllable-gates together to prajñā's nothing to be attained—and both are taken up in the treatise's own text before and after and by the ancient masters.
First, the treatise's internal self-references. The treatise-author, explaining the numbered dharmas of the limbs of the path in this chapter, repeatedly marks their source himself, passing over them with 「如先說」 tr. "as explained before" and 「如初品中說」 tr. "as explained in the first chapter" and pointing back to earlier chapters. Explaining ānāpāna, he says 「安那般那義,如先說」 tr. "the meaning of ānāpāna is as explained before"〔T25 0404b14〕; explaining the general meaning of the thirty-seven limbs, he says 「三十七品論議,如先說」 tr. "the discussion of the thirty-seven limbs is as explained before"〔T25 0405c22〕; explaining the three samādhi, the eleven knowledges, the three outflow-free faculties, and so on, he says 「復次,三三昧、十一智、三無漏根…如先說」 tr. "furthermore, the three samādhi, the eleven knowledges, the three outflow-free faculties … are as explained before"〔T25 0406a09〕; explaining the ten powers of the Buddha, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, and the eighteen unshared dharmas, he says 「…如初品中說」 tr. "… as explained in the first chapter"〔T25 0406a11〕; and in Treatise ②, explaining the meaning of the five aggregates and so on among the twenty merits, he likewise says 「五眾等義如先說」 tr. "the meaning of the five aggregates and so on is as explained before"〔T25 0409b21〕. Thus the broad meaning of the numbered dharmas of the limbs of the path in this chapter is tied by the treatise-author himself to the extended explanations in the first chapter of this treatise and in the preceding text; the explicit statements of these cross-readings are all set up by the treatise-author himself.
Second, the meaning of the substance and function of the Mahāyāna is taken up by the chapters before and after and by the ancient masters. This chapter's sentence pattern 「四念處…是名菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」 tr. "the four foundations of mindfulness … these are called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna" directly continues the formula for listing the substance of the vehicle in the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna", 「六波羅蜜是菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」 tr. "the six perfections are the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna"—the preceding chapter lists the six perfections, the eighteen emptinesses, and the hundred and eight samādhi as the substance of the vehicle, and this chapter goes on to list the thirty-seven limbs of the path and the forty-two syllable-gates as the vehicle, in one continuous succession of 「所謂…是名菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍」 tr. "namely … these are called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva's Mahāyāna." As for its transmission onward: the doctrine of the forty-two syllable-gates of this chapter is taken up directly and commented on by Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra with 「四十二字辨大乘一切名」 tr. "the forty-two syllables distinguish all the names of the Great Vehicle"〔X24 0248a02〕, his commentary being, on the contrary, especially detailed; the series of limbs of the path in this chapter's Sūtra ② belongs to the same lineage as the restatement of the limbs of the path from "Setting Out" cited in Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises〔X46 0573a06〕 (its citation recorded without judgement). The loss of Huiying's commentary for this chapter (Section VI) is one break, in the surviving texts, in the chain by which this doctrine was handed down, and it is honestly noted alongside. These further resonances lie in the continuity of the line of meaning, and what each master takes up follows his own doctrinal aim; this section records their succession and does not fix a reading on anyone's behalf, and the sources tied to them are all found, word for word, in Sections V and VI.
VIII. Witnesses and Editions
Of this chapter's collation, the points that may bear on the meaning of the scripture are selected as follows; variant readings are preserved side by side, while the main text continues to follow the reading of the current base text. This chapter falls wholly within the single Fascicle 48 (not crossing fascicles), and has two special configurations that must be noted first—the Palace edition survives for this fascicle and can be collated (exactly the reverse of the first half of the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna", Fascicle 46, where the Palace edition is absent for the whole fascicle), and the double-track displacement of the Ishiyama text, chapter number minus one and fascicle number plus two (fully confirmed at the starting point of the chapter title, while unresolved anomalies appear at the close at the end of the fascicle); the two matters are detailed in the final paragraphs of this section.
0402c14 (chapter title; two-way mutual attestation of the two transmissions): 大智度論釋四念處品第十九【大】|釋四念處品第十九經作廣乘品【明】|第十九品釋廣乘品【宮】|釋第十八品【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第十八四念處品卷五十【石】 (note0402020)—within this treatise's line, the Taishō base text titles it 「四念處品」 tr. "Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness"; the Ming edition appends the note 「經作廣乘品」 tr. "the sūtra has 'Chapter on the Broad Vehicle'" (pointing directly to the title of the sūtra explained); the Palace edition titles it outright 「廣乘品」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle" (the chapter number still the nineteenth; only the chapter name abandons 「四念處」 tr. "the four foundations of mindfulness" and follows 「廣乘」 tr. "the broad vehicle", in agreement with the sūtra explained, T223, whose base text titles itself 「廣乘品」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle"); the Shōgozō reads 「釋第十八品」 tr. "Commentary on the Eighteenth Chapter" (a chapter number one less than the Taishō); and the Ishiyama text titles it 「品第十八…卷五十」 tr. "Chapter Eighteen … Fascicle Fifty" (chapter number one less, fascicle number two more; see the final paragraphs of this section). This forms a two-way contrast with the chapter title of the sūtra explained, T223—the Taishō base text of T223 titles it 「廣乘品第十九」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle, the Nineteenth"〔T08 0253b17〕, and within the container of that chapter title the Khitan-edition note reads 「丹本名為四念處品」 tr. "the Khitan edition names it 'Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness'" (T08 0253b18 Khitan-edition interlinear note) (pointing directly to this treatise's title). Thus the variants within each of the two works each point to the other's reading, forming a closed loop of two-way mutual attestation (see Section IV). The main text follows the base text's 「四念處品」 tr. "Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness."
0409c16 (end-of-fascicle colophon; the Palace edition omits an appended phrase): 釋第十九品【大】|〔-〕【宮】 (note0409030)—in the closing colophon of Fascicle 48, 「大智度論卷第四十八釋第十九品」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Forty-eight, Commentary on the Nineteenth Chapter", the four characters 「釋第十九品」 tr. "Commentary on the Nineteenth Chapter" are omitted in the Palace edition. This is consistent with the Palace edition's logic of titling the chapter outright 「廣乘品」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle" (its chapter name being self-sufficient, it does not further append the Taishō's chapter title); it is not an absence. The main text follows the base text.
0409c16 (end of fascicle; anomaly in the Ishiyama fascicle number at the close; unresolved): 四十八【大】|十五【石】 (note0409029)—the fascicle numeral in the end-of-fascicle colophon 「卷第四十八」 tr. "Fascicle Forty-eight" reads 「十五」 tr. "fifteen" in the Ishiyama text. This reading does not agree with the 「卷五十」 tr. "Fascicle Fifty" that the Ishiyama text itself reports at the starting point of the chapter title in the same fascicle (fascicle number plus two) (for one and the same Fascicle 48, the Ishiyama text reads 「五十」 tr. "fifty" at the opening title and 「十五」 tr. "fifteen" at the end of the fascicle: the Ishiyama text's fascicle coordinates at the two places contradict each other). This section has not been able to determine the cause (whether 「五十」 tr. "fifty" and 「十五」 tr. "fifteen" are an inversion in transcription or in carving, there being no side evidence to rely on, it does not force a determination); it records this honestly as an unresolved anomaly, does not force it into the existing displacement framework, and leaves it for later re-checking against a more complete copy of the Ishiyama scriptures. The main text follows the base text's 「四十八」 tr. "forty-eight."
0409c16 (end of fascicle; the Ishiyama chapter number at the close; the Shōgozō's minus one agrees / the Ishiyama text lacks the character 'ten'): 十九品【大】|十八品【聖】|八品竟【石】 (note0409031)—for the chapter number in 「釋第十九品」 tr. "Commentary on the Nineteenth Chapter" at the end of the fascicle, the Shōgozō reads 「十八品」 tr. "Eighteenth Chapter" (chapter number minus one, in the same direction as its chapter title 「釋第十八品」 tr. "Commentary on the Eighteenth Chapter"); the Ishiyama text reads 「八品竟」 tr. "Eighth Chapter ended", lacking, compared with the Taishō's 「十九品」 tr. "Nineteenth Chapter", the one character 「十」 tr. "ten." The main text follows the base text's 「十九品」 tr. "Nineteenth Chapter."
0406a21 (the four right efforts; variant graphs for 'effort'): 勤【T25n1509】|懃【T08n0223】—in Sūtra ②'s 「所謂四正勤」 tr. "namely, the four right efforts", the 「勤」 tr. "effort" appears in the sūtra explained, T223, at the same place as 「四正懃」 tr. "the four right efforts" (written with the variant graph)〔T08 0254b12〕. Both characters mean diligence; they are graphic variants in the usage of the same translator's two works, not a doctrinal divergence, and are recorded without judgement. The main text follows this treatise's base text's 「勤」 tr. "effort."
0407b23 (the four unobstructed knowledges; variant graphs for 'obstruction'): 礙【T25n1509】|閡【T08n0223】—in Sūtra ②'s 「四無礙智」 tr. "the four unobstructed knowledges", the 「礙」 tr. "obstruction" is written throughout T223 as 「閡」 tr. "obstruction" (variant graph) (unobstructed as to meaning, unobstructed as to dharma, unobstructed as to expression, unobstructed as to eloquence)〔T08 0255c20, in the vicinity〕; this is a graphic difference consistent across the two works, not an isolated misprint, and is recorded without judgement. The main text follows this treatise's base text's 「礙」 tr. "obstruction."
0406c09 (the third of the three faculties; 'the faculty of one who knows' / 'the faculty of the wise'): 知者根【T25n1509】|智者根【T08n0223】—for the third of the three faculties, this treatise reads 「知者根」 tr. "the faculty of one who knows", and T223 reads 「智者根」 tr. "the faculty of the wise"〔T08 0255a05〕. 「知者」 tr. "one who knows" (the stage beyond training, of one who has already known) and 「智者」 tr. "the wise" refer doctrinally to the same stage beyond training; which is the original translation is not decided, and it is recorded without judgement. The main text follows this treatise's base text's 「知者根」 tr. "the faculty of one who knows."
0406c25 (the seventh of the ten recollections; 'recollection of cessation' / 'recollection of the good'; three-way confirmation): 滅【T25n1509】|善【T08n0223 底本】/滅【T08n0223 聖本】 (T08 note0255003)—for the seventh of the ten recollections, this treatise reads 「念滅」 tr. "recollection of cessation", the Taishō base text of the sūtra explained, T223, reads 「念善」 tr. "recollection of the good", and T223's Shōgozō variant reads precisely 「念滅」 tr. "recollection of cessation" (T08 note0255003 「善【大】,滅【聖】」 tr. "'good' in the Taishō; 'cessation' in the Shōgozō"). Thus this treatise's base text and T223's Shōgozō, two witnesses, both read 「滅」 tr. "cessation", and only the base text on which the Taishō T223 relies reads 「善」 tr. "the good"; 「念滅」 tr. "recollection of cessation" is the recollection of stillness and cessation, a common item in the tradition of the ten recollections. Following its discipline, this section records the three-way distribution and does not decide on anyone's behalf; the main text follows this treatise's base text's 「念滅」 tr. "recollection of cessation."
From 0407c11 (the sūtra's list of names) / from 0408b14 (the treatise's explanation) (the forty-two syllable-gates; the characters used at eight places differ between the two layers of sūtra and treatise; differences between the sūtra layer and the treatise layer within this treatise, T25n1509, itself, checked character by character and recorded without conjectural emendation): for the forty-two syllable-gates of entry, the sūtra first lists the names (「阿字門,一切法初不生故」 tr. "the gate of the syllable a, because all dharmas are from the first unarisen" and so on), and the treatise then explains the names one by one with glosses in the language of Qin attached (for example, 「若聞羅字,即隨義知一切法離垢相」 tr. "if one hears the syllable ra, then following its meaning one knows the mark of all dharmas as free of defilement", with the further note 「羅闍,秦言垢」 tr. "rajas, in the language of Qin 'defilement'"). Comparing by position in the order of the syllables, the sūtra's list of names and the treatise's explanation differ in the characters used at eight places—first, the sūtra's seventeenth has 「磨」 tr. "the seventeenth syllable (sūtra graph)"〔0407c23〕 and the treatise has 「摩」 tr. "the seventeenth syllable (treatise graph)"〔0408c07〕; second, the sūtra's nineteenth has 「他」 tr. "the nineteenth syllable (sūtra graph)"〔0407c24〕 and the treatise has 「陀」 tr. "the nineteenth syllable (treatise graph)"〔0408c09〕; third, the sūtra's twenty-first has 「簸」 tr. "the twenty-first syllable (single graph)"〔0407c26〕 and the treatise has 「濕波」 tr. "the twenty-first syllable (two graphs)"〔0408c12〕; fourth, the sūtra's twenty-eighth has 「拖」 tr. "the twenty-eighth syllable (sūtra graph)"〔0408a01〕 and the treatise has 「他」 tr. "the twenty-eighth syllable (treatise graph)"〔0408c21〕; fifth, the sūtra's thirty-first has 「魔」 tr. "the thirty-first syllable (single graph)"〔0408a04〕 and the treatise has 「濕尛」 tr. "the thirty-first syllable (two graphs)"〔0408c25〕; sixth, the sūtra's thirty-fifth has 「咃」 tr. "the thirty-fifth syllable (sūtra graph)"〔0408a07〕 and the treatise has 「他」 tr. "the thirty-fifth syllable (treatise graph)"〔0409a05〕; seventh, the sūtra's forty-first has 「咤」 tr. "the forty-first syllable (sūtra graph)"〔0408a11〕 and the treatise has 「吒」 tr. "the forty-first syllable (treatise graph)"〔0409a12〕; eighth, the sūtra's forty-second has 「荼」 tr. "the forty-second syllable (sūtra graph)"〔0408a12〕 and the treatise has 「茶」 tr. "the forty-second syllable (treatise graph)"〔0409a14〕. Of these, the twenty-first (single graph in the sūtra, two graphs in the treatise) and the thirty-first (likewise) are a difference between a single character and a compound syllable: the treatise, with the compound syllables 「濕波」 tr. "the twenty-first syllable (two graphs)" and 「濕尛」 tr. "the thirty-first syllable (two graphs)", annotates their actual reading in detail (the sound of a consonant cluster), while the sūtra records them briefly with a single character; the two are not in contradiction, but are two forms, brief record and detailed annotation, of the same Sanskrit sound. The remaining six places are drifts between characters close in sound or similar in shape. These eight places are all differences of wording between the sūtra layer and the treatise layer within this treatise itself, neither variants across transmissions nor errors of search; they are recorded to preserve the facts, without conjectural emendation on anyone's behalf.
0407c26/0408c12 (the graph of the twenty-first syllable; collateral collation evidence): for the character 「簸」 tr. "the twenty-first syllable (single graph)" in the sūtra's list of names, the Song, Palace, and Shōgozō editions read the variant form 「𤿺」 tr. "the same graph in a variant form" (note0407032 「簸【大】下同,𤿺【宋】【宮】【聖】下同」 tr. "the standard form in the Taishō, likewise below; the variant form in the Song, Palace, and Shōgozō, likewise below"); in the treatise's sentence 「濕簸字無義,故不釋」 tr. "the syllable of the twenty-first gate has no meaning, and therefore it is not explained", the 「簸」 tr. "second graph of that syllable, as the Taishō writes it" is read as 「波」 tr. "second graph of that syllable, as the other editions write it" in all six editions, the Song, Yuan, Ming, Palace, Shōgozō, and Ishiyama (note0408042 「簸【大】,波【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【石】」 tr. "the one graph in the Taishō; the other graph in the Song, Yuan, Ming, Palace, Shōgozō, and Ishiyama texts")—most transmitted texts read at this place in the treatise 「濕波」 tr. "the twenty-first syllable (two graphs)", not the 「濕簸」 tr. "the twenty-first syllable (two graphs, Taishō form)" unique to the Taishō, which makes the difference of characters between the two layers, sūtra (single graph) and treatise (two graphs), all the more evident. Recorded without judgement; the main text follows the base text.
0408c25 (the graph of the thirty-first syllable; collateral collation evidence): in the treatise's 「濕尛」 tr. "the thirty-first syllable (two graphs)", the 「尛」 tr. "second graph of that syllable, as the Taishō writes it" is read as 「麼」 tr. "second graph of that syllable, as the other editions write it" in the four editions, the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace (note0408051 「尛【大】下同,麼【宋】【元】【明】【宮】下同」 tr. "the one graph in the Taishō, likewise below; the other graph in the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace, likewise below")—of the same type as the twenty-first (single graph in the sūtra, two graphs in the treatise), this compound-syllable character of the thirty-first (likewise single graph in the sūtra, two graphs in the treatise) also has a variant reading in most transmitted texts at the treatise layer; the two cases appear side by side, further proving that the difference in characters between the sūtra layer and the treatise layer is not an isolated case. The 「魔」 tr. "the thirty-first syllable (single graph)" in the sūtra's list of names〔0408a04〕 has no collation note at that place. Recorded without judgement; the main text follows the base text's 「尛」 tr. "second graph of that syllable, as the Taishō writes it."
The two special configurations of this chapter's single fascicle are recorded together as follows. First, the Palace edition survives for this fascicle (Fascicle 48, the whole of Chapter 19) and can be collated. This section checked item by item the collation notes for the whole of Fascicle 48 (two hundred and forty-three in all) and found no statement that the Palace edition is missing for this fascicle; moreover, ninety-nine of them explicitly list the Palace edition as a witness (including the Palace edition's own variant readings, such as titling the chapter outright 「廣乘品」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle"〔note0402020〕 and omitting 「釋第十九品」 tr. "Commentary on the Nineteenth Chapter" at the end of the fascicle〔note0409030〕), confirming that the Palace edition can be collated word by word for Fascicle 48 and is not absent. Because the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna", spans Fascicles 46 and 47, half of it falls into the Palace gap and half does not; this chapter falls wholly within the single Fascicle 48, and the Palace edition survives throughout—this boundary must be noted clearly, and the previous chapter's judgement that the Palace edition is missing must not be carried over. Second, the Ishiyama text's double-track displacement of chapter number minus one and fascicle number plus two is fully confirmed at the starting point of the chapter title, while unresolved anomalies appear at the close at the end of the fascicle. At the starting point of the chapter title〔0402c14〕 the Ishiyama text reports itself as 「摩訶般若波羅蜜品第十八…卷五十」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā Chapter, the Eighteenth … Fascicle Fifty"—the chapter number eighteen is one less than the Taishō's nineteenth, and the fascicle number fifty is two more than the Taishō's forty-eight, agreeing with the pattern of chapter number minus one and fascicle number plus two already seen in the preceding Chapter 18, "Mahāyāna", and in the two chapters before that (Chapters 16 and 17), and giving a fourth consecutive confirmation. But at the close at the end of the fascicle〔0409c16 nearby〕 two of the Ishiyama text's coordinates do not wholly fit this pattern: the fascicle number in the Ishiyama text is fifteen (note0409029, not fifty), and the chapter number in the Ishiyama text is 'eighth chapter ended' (note0409031, lacking a 'ten'). This section honestly records both anomalies side by side, neither forcing them into the existing displacement nor avoiding them, and leaves them for later re-checking against a more complete copy of the Ishiyama scriptures. This is the first data point at which the existing double-track displacement pattern of the Ishiyama text meets an incomplete fit at the closing end.
The remaining collation notes for this whole chapter, apart from the chapter-title notes and the items listed above, are mostly technical variants—additions or omissions of particles, loan characters of the same sound or similar shape, fuller or briefer transcriptions—and item-by-item checking found no change at the doctrinal level, so they are not set out one by one but only passed over statistically. The base text of this chapter is the whole chapter in Fascicle 48 of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa〔T25 0402c14–0409c15〕, the end point of the range being taken at the heading of the next chapter, Chapter 20, "Setting Out" (0409c23), not included. The collation text for the sūtra explained is Chapter 19, "The Broad Vehicle", of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra (T08n0223; the chapter title in the Taishō base text reads 「廣乘品」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle", and the Khitan edition notes 「四念處品」 tr. "Chapter on the Four Foundations of Mindfulness"). The collation text for the ancient-master commentary is Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451; a substantive outline for both reader units, especially detailed on the syllable-gate passage, following the name 「廣乘品」 tr. "Chapter on the Broad Vehicle"); there are in addition Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791; its passage-by-passage commentary on this chapter is lost in the gap of Fascicles 18 to 20 of the commentary's fragmentary fascicles, and there is a trap of identical names, the syllable-gate passage of Chapter 1, the Introduction, which must be distinguished) and Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784; no direct citation of this chapter, only one citation restating the limbs of the path from the neighbouring "Setting Out"). Variant notes follow the Taishō collation, covering differences between the Taishō base text and the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace editions, the Shōgozō, and the Ishiyama text. The full collation notes for this chapter are preserved in detail in the working base text; this list transcribes only the principal items that bear on the wording of this chapter's core doctrine, and does not extend into judgements of the relative merit of the editions.