大智度論 乘乘品Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · Riding the Vehicle

乘乘品:舍利弗問富樓那『云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘』——菩薩行般若波羅蜜時乘檀波羅蜜乃至般若波羅蜜,亦不得檀波羅蜜、菩薩、受者,用無所得故乃至乘於大乘(檀、尸羅、羼提、毘梨耶、禪、般若六度逐一);一心應薩婆若修四念處乃至十八不共法法壞故是亦不可得,菩薩但有名字眾生不可得,色但有名字色不可得乃至阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字佛不可得(色受想行識、眼乃至意、四念處乃至八聖道分、內空乃至無法有法空、十八不共法、諸法如、法相法性法住實際、菩提及佛十一層),具足神通成就眾生淨佛世界得一切種智轉法輪十方諸佛稱名讚歎;論主以富樓那三事明摩訶薩、有人言大莊嚴發大莊嚴乘於大乘三階(生法二空遞進)、不雜心離煩惱二乘意為薩婆若修相不可得、知一切法假名字、發大莊嚴常乘大乘得成佛轉法輪、大乘名畢竟清淨六波羅蜜五神通自莊嚴常不離諸佛得佛道(經+論)

〔T25 0389b02〕
心要Essence

前一品〈大莊嚴品〉,富樓那一開口便立了三句宗——是菩薩大莊嚴、是菩薩發趣大乘、是菩薩乘於大乘。前二句既已說過,到這一品,說的正是第三句「乘於大乘」。仍是舍利弗問、富樓那答——怎樣才叫菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。富樓那的回答看似層層鋪開,其實只繞著一個字轉,那便是「乘」。菩薩乘檀波羅蜜乃至般若波羅蜜,卻不得所乘的波羅蜜、不得能乘的菩薩、不得布施的受者,一切用無所得的心去乘,這才叫乘於大乘——乘而不著,是頭一層意思。第二層更深。菩薩作這樣的觀照——色只是個名字,色本身畢竟不可得;受想行識、眼乃至意、四念處乃至八聖道分、內空乃至十八不共法,以至諸法如、法性、法住、實際,全都只是名字施設,畢竟不可得。到最徹底處,連「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」這無上正等正覺的果、連「佛」本身,也一樣但有名字、佛不可得——不是別的空了而佛還立著,是連佛果自身也收進這畢竟空裡,方才稱得上乘於大乘。論裡把這「乘乘」的得名分作三個台階說——只知布施內外之物、還破不了我執的,只叫大莊嚴;能破我執、入了眾生空、卻還沒入法空的,叫發大莊嚴;要具足生法二空,行布施時三輪體空、不見有施的人受的人所施的財物,這才叫乘於大乘。可見這一「乘」,不是憑多行幾度、多莊嚴幾分,而是憑一顆不雜的心——離開一切煩惱、也離開二乘那自了的意,一味為著薩婆若、為著一切智而行;有了這不雜之心,修四念處乃至十八不共法而連所修之相也不可得、畢竟清淨,這才是乘於大乘。所以整一品,說到底,是要你看清——大乘不是一輛供你攀住不放的車,正因為乘它的人乘而不得所乘、觀一切法但有名字而畢竟不可得、以不雜的心一路為著一切智,他才真正乘上了這大乘,常乘此大乘、初無休息,直到成佛、轉法輪。這,便是乘乘品要你去領會的般若。

In the previous chapter, The Great Adornment, Pūrṇa set up three propositions as soon as he opened his mouth: this bodhisattva is greatly adorned; this bodhisattva sets out toward the Great Vehicle; this bodhisattva rides the Great Vehicle. The first two having been spoken, this chapter speaks precisely of the third, ‘riding the Great Vehicle’. Still Śāriputra asks and Pūrṇa answers: what is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva riding the Great Vehicle. Pūrṇa's answer seems to spread out layer by layer, but in truth it turns around a single word, ‘ride’. The bodhisattva rides the perfection of giving up to the perfection of prajñā, yet does not find the perfection ridden, does not find the bodhisattva who rides, does not find the recipient of the gift; riding all of it with the mind of nothing to be attained, this alone is called riding the Great Vehicle; riding without clinging is the first layer of meaning. The second layer goes deeper. The bodhisattva contemplates thus: form is only a name, and form itself is ultimately unfindable; feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, the eye up to the mind, the four foundations of mindfulness up to the limbs of the eightfold noble path, inner emptiness up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, and even the suchness of dharmas, dharma-nature, the abiding of dharmas, and the limit of reality, all are only names set up, ultimately unfindable. At the most thoroughgoing point even ‘anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi’, the fruit of unsurpassed, right, and complete awakening, even ‘the Buddha’ himself, is likewise a name only, and the Buddha cannot be found; it is not that other things are emptied while the Buddha still stands, but that even the Buddha-fruit itself is gathered into this ultimate emptiness, and only then can one speak of riding the Great Vehicle. The treatise explains the naming of ‘riding the vehicle’ by three steps: one who knows only how to give away inner and outer things and cannot yet break the clinging to self is called merely greatly adorned; one who can break the clinging to self and has entered the emptiness of beings but not yet the emptiness of dharmas is called arousing the great adornment; one who is complete in both the emptiness of beings and the emptiness of dharmas, and in practising giving finds the three spheres empty in substance, seeing no giver, no receiver, and no thing given, this alone is called riding the Great Vehicle. So this ‘riding’ does not rest on practising a few more perfections or adorning oneself a few degrees more, but on an unmixed mind: apart from all afflictions and apart from the two vehicles' intent of settling only oneself, practising with a single taste for sarvajñā, for omniscience; with this unmixed mind one cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness up to the eighteen unshared dharmas while even the mark of what is cultivated is unfindable, ultimately pure, and this is riding the Great Vehicle. So the whole chapter, when all is said, wants you to see clearly: the Great Vehicle is not a cart for you to seize and never let go; precisely because the one who rides it rides without finding what is ridden, contemplates all dharmas as names only and ultimately unfindable, and with an unmixed mind goes all the way for the sake of omniscience, he truly mounts this Great Vehicle, riding this Great Vehicle always and never resting from the first, until he becomes a Buddha and turns the wheel of Dharma. This is the prajñā that the Chapter on Riding the Vehicle wants you to grasp.

原典Canonical · verbatim

卷46 〔T25 0389b02〕

大智度論釋乘乘品第十六 龍樹菩薩造 後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯 【經】 爾時,慧命舍利弗問富樓那:「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘?」 富樓那答舍利弗言:「菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,乘檀波羅蜜,亦不得檀波羅蜜,亦不得菩薩,亦不得受者,用無所得故,是名菩薩摩訶薩乘檀波羅蜜。菩薩摩訶薩行般若波羅蜜時,乘尸羅波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜;乘般若波羅蜜,亦不得般若波羅蜜,亦不得菩薩,用無所得故,是為菩薩摩訶薩乘於般若波羅蜜。如是,舍利弗!是為菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。 「復次,舍利弗!菩薩摩訶薩摩訶衍,一心應薩婆若,修四念處,法壞故;乃至一心應薩婆若,修十八不共法,法壞故,是亦不可得。如是,舍利弗!是名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。 「復次,舍利弗!菩薩摩訶薩作是念:『菩薩但有名字,眾生不可得故。』是名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。 「復次,舍利弗!若菩薩摩訶薩作是念:『色但有名字,色不可得故;受、想、行、識但有名字,識不可得故。眼但有名字,眼不可得故;乃至意亦如是。四念處但有名字,四念處不可得故;乃至八聖道分但有名字,八聖道分不可得故。內空但有名字,內空不可得故;乃至無法有法空但有名字,無法有法空不可得故;乃至十八不共法但有名字,十八不共法不可〔T25 0389c〕得故。諸法如但有名字,如不可得故;法相、法性、法住、實際但有名字,實際不可得故。阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字,佛不可得故。』如是,舍利弗!是名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。 「復次,舍利弗!若菩薩摩訶薩從初發意已來,具足菩薩神通,成就眾生,從一佛國至一佛國,恭敬、供養、尊重、讚歎諸佛,從諸佛聽受法教,所謂菩薩大乘。是菩薩乘此大乘,從一佛國至一佛國,淨佛世界,成就眾生,初無佛國想,亦無眾生想。此人住不二法中,為眾生受身,隨其所應,自變其形而教化之;乃至一切智,終不離菩薩乘。是菩薩得一切種智已,轉法輪,聲聞、辟支佛及天龍、鬼神、阿修羅、世間人民所不能轉。爾時,十方如恒河沙等諸佛皆歡喜稱名讚歎,作是言:『某方某國某菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘,得一切種智,轉法輪!』舍利弗!是名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。」 【論】 釋曰: 富樓那以三事明摩訶薩,上已說二事,今問第三事「乘於大乘」,富樓那答。 有人言:菩薩直布施內外物,不能破吾我相,是名「大莊嚴」;若能破吾我相,入眾生空,未入法空,是名「發大莊嚴」。因眾生空入法空中,行檀波羅蜜,不見三事:施者、受者、財物,能如是者,是名「乘於大乘」。餘波羅蜜亦如是。 是菩薩以不雜心,離諸煩惱及二〔T25 0390a〕乘意,為薩婆若故,修行四念處,修相亦不可得,畢竟清淨故。是名乘於大乘。乃至十八不共法亦如是。 復次,若菩薩知一切法假名字,於名字和合中復有名字;一切世間、若出世間,皆是假名。是名乘於大乘。 復次,菩薩發大莊嚴,具足菩薩神通;具足菩薩神通故,成就眾生,從一佛國至一佛國;所經諸國,雨七寶蓮華,供養諸佛,拔三惡道眾生。變身無數,各各至諸佛前,聽受大乘法化;從諸佛前,趣大乘相。乘此大乘,從一佛國至一佛國,成就眾生,淨佛世界;不生眾生相,不取佛國相。住不二入地中,隨諸眾生所應度者而化度之,為眾生故受身。常乘大乘,初無休息。是菩薩乘於大乘,得成佛,轉法輪,諸聲聞、辟支佛所不能轉,何況餘小凡夫!十方如恒河沙等世界諸佛讚歎是菩薩:「某方某國某甲菩薩乘於大乘,成佛,轉法輪。」如是相,名為乘於大乘。 復次,大乘名畢竟清淨六波羅蜜。菩薩摩訶薩乘大乘時,以五神通而自莊嚴;菩薩住是乘中,一時變身無數,至十方世界供養諸佛,度脫眾生。是菩薩常不離諸佛,乃至得佛道,常乘此大乘。


《大智度論》卷46 · T25n1509 0389b02–0390a24

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

舍利弗問「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」

那時,慧命舍利弗問富樓那:『怎麼叫做菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘呢。』

富樓那答(一)·六度為所乘——乘檀波羅蜜乃至般若波羅蜜,亦不得所乘之度與能乘之菩薩受者,用無所得故名乘於大乘

富樓那回答舍利弗說:『菩薩摩訶薩修行般若波羅蜜的時候,乘於檀波羅蜜,卻也不執得檀波羅蜜,也不執得菩薩,也不執得受者,因為無所得的緣故,這就叫做菩薩摩訶薩乘於檀波羅蜜。菩薩摩訶薩修行般若波羅蜜的時候,乘於尸羅波羅蜜、羼提波羅蜜、毘梨耶波羅蜜、禪波羅蜜,乘於般若波羅蜜,卻也不執得般若波羅蜜,也不執得菩薩,因為無所得的緣故,這就是菩薩摩訶薩乘於般若波羅蜜。像這樣,舍利弗!這就是菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。

復次(一)·一心應薩婆若,修四念處乃至十八不共法,法壞故是亦不可得

『再者,舍利弗!菩薩摩訶薩的摩訶衍,一心相應於薩婆若,修習四念處,因為法會壞的緣故;乃至一心相應於薩婆若,修習十八不共法,因為法會壞的緣故,這修習也是不可得的。像這樣,舍利弗!這就叫做菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。

復次(二)·菩薩但有名字,眾生不可得故

『再者,舍利弗!菩薩摩訶薩作這樣的念想:菩薩只是有個名字罷了,因為眾生不可得的緣故。這就叫做菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。

復次(三)·色乃至佛但有名字、皆不可得——十一層法目盡歸畢竟空

『再者,舍利弗!若菩薩摩訶薩作這樣的念想:色只是有個名字罷了,因為色不可得的緣故;受、想、行、識只是有個名字罷了,因為識不可得的緣故。眼只是有個名字罷了,因為眼不可得的緣故;乃至於意也都是這樣。四念處只是有個名字罷了,因為四念處不可得的緣故;乃至八聖道分只是有個名字罷了,因為八聖道分不可得的緣故。內空只是有個名字罷了,因為內空不可得的緣故;乃至無法有法空只是有個名字罷了,因為無法有法空不可得的緣故;乃至十八不共法只是有個名字罷了,因為十八不共法不可得的緣故。諸法的如只是有個名字罷了,因為如不可得的緣故;法相、法性、法住、實際只是有個名字罷了,因為實際不可得的緣故。阿耨多羅三藐三菩提以及佛只是有個名字罷了,因為佛不可得的緣故。像這樣,舍利弗!這就叫做菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。

復次(四)·具足神通、成就眾生、淨佛世界、得一切種智轉法輪,十方諸佛稱名讚歎

『再者,舍利弗!若菩薩摩訶薩從最初發心以來,具足菩薩的神通,成就眾生,從這一個佛國到那一個佛國,恭敬、供養、尊重、讚歎諸佛,從諸佛聽受法教,也就是所謂的菩薩大乘。這菩薩乘著這大乘,從這一個佛國到那一個佛國,清淨佛的世界,成就眾生,起初就沒有佛國之想,也沒有眾生之想。這人安住在不二的法當中,為眾生受身,隨著他們所應受度的,自己變現形貌而教化他們;乃至一切智,始終不離菩薩之乘。這菩薩證得一切種智以後,轉動法輪,是聲聞、辟支佛以及天、龍、鬼神、阿修羅、世間人民所不能轉的。那時,十方如恒河沙那樣多的諸佛都歡喜,稱名讚歎,這樣說:某方某國某位菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘,證得一切種智,轉動法輪。舍利弗!這就叫做菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘。』

以下是論釋。

論主起釋——富樓那以三事明摩訶薩,前二事已說,今答第三事乘於大乘

論主解釋說。

富樓那用三件事來說明摩訶薩,上面已經說了兩件事,如今所問的是第三件事「乘於大乘」,富樓那便來回答。

有人言·大莊嚴、發大莊嚴、乘於大乘三階——依生法二空證得之淺深而分

有人說:菩薩只是布施內外的財物,還不能破除我執之相,這叫做「大莊嚴」;若能破除我執之相,入於眾生空,卻還未入於法空,這叫做「發大莊嚴」。因著眾生空而入於法空當中,修行檀波羅蜜,不見施者、受者、財物這三件事,能夠這樣的,這叫做「乘於大乘」。其餘的波羅蜜也是這樣。

論釋復次(一)·不雜心離煩惱二乘意,為薩婆若故修四念處,修相不可得

這菩薩以不夾雜之心,遠離諸煩惱以及二乘的意念,為著薩婆若的緣故,修行四念處,而修行之相也不可得,因為畢竟清淨的緣故。這就叫做乘於大乘。乃至十八不共法也是這樣。

論釋復次(二三)·知一切法假名字,名字和合中復有名字,世出世間皆假名

再者,若菩薩了知一切法都是假的名字,在名字和合當中又有名字;一切世間的法、或出世間的法,都是假名。這就叫做乘於大乘。

論釋復次(四)·發大莊嚴具足神通,雨寶供佛、變身聽法、常乘大乘,得成佛轉法輪

再者,菩薩發起大莊嚴,具足菩薩的神通;因為具足菩薩神通的緣故,成就眾生,從這一個佛國到那一個佛國;所經過的諸國,降下七寶蓮華,供養諸佛,拔濟三惡道的眾生。變現無數之身,各各到諸佛面前,聽受大乘的法化;從諸佛面前,趣向大乘之相。乘著這大乘,從這一個佛國到那一個佛國,成就眾生,清淨佛的世界;不生起眾生之相,不取著佛國之相。安住在不二的入地當中,隨著諸眾生所應受度的而化度他們,為著眾生的緣故而受身。常常乘著大乘,起初便沒有休息。這菩薩乘於大乘,得以成佛,轉動法輪,是諸聲聞、辟支佛所不能轉的,何況其餘的小凡夫呢。十方如恒河沙那樣多的世界諸佛都讚歎這菩薩:某方某國某甲菩薩乘於大乘,成佛,轉動法輪。像這樣之相,就名為乘於大乘。

論主終結——大乘名畢竟清淨六波羅蜜,五神通自莊嚴,常不離諸佛乃至得佛道

再者,大乘就叫做畢竟清淨的六波羅蜜。菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘的時候,以五神通來莊嚴自身;菩薩安住在這乘當中,一時之間變現無數之身,到十方世界供養諸佛,度脫眾生。這菩薩常常不離諸佛,乃至證得佛道,常常乘著這大乘。

Śāriputra Asks, ‘What Is Meant by the Bodhisattva-Mahāsattva Riding the Great Vehicle?’

At that time the venerable Śāriputra asked Pūrṇa: ‘What is meant by the bodhisattva-mahāsattva riding the Great Vehicle?’

Pūrṇa's Answer (1): The Six Perfections as What Is Ridden—He Rides the Perfection of Giving and So On up to Prajñāpāramitā, Yet Does Not Grasp the Perfection Ridden, Nor the Bodhisattva Who Rides, Nor the Receiver; Because There Is Nothing to Be Attained, This Is Called Riding the Great Vehicle

Pūrṇa answered Śāriputra, saying: ‘When the bodhisattva-mahāsattva practises prajñāpāramitā, he rides the perfection of giving (dāna), yet he does not grasp the perfection of giving, does not grasp the bodhisattva, and does not grasp the receiver; because there is nothing to be attained, this is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva riding the perfection of giving. When the bodhisattva-mahāsattva practises prajñāpāramitā, he rides the perfection of morality (śīla), the perfection of patience (kṣānti), the perfection of vigour (vīrya), and the perfection of meditation (dhyāna), and he rides prajñāpāramitā, yet he does not grasp prajñāpāramitā and does not grasp the bodhisattva; because there is nothing to be attained, this is the bodhisattva-mahāsattva riding prajñāpāramitā. Thus, Śāriputra, this is the bodhisattva-mahāsattva riding the Great Vehicle.

Furthermore (1): With a Single Mind in Accord with Sarvajñā He Cultivates the Four Foundations of Mindfulness and So On up to the eighteen unshared dharmas; Because Dharmas Perish, This Too Is Unfindable

‘Furthermore, Śāriputra, the Mahāyāna of the bodhisattva-mahāsattva is this: with a single mind in accord with sarvajñā (omniscience), he cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness, because dharmas perish; and so on up to: with a single mind in accord with sarvajñā, he cultivates the eighteen unshared dharmas, because dharmas perish—and this cultivating too is unfindable. Thus, Śāriputra, this is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva riding the Great Vehicle.

Furthermore (2): The Bodhisattva Is Only a Name, Because Beings Are Unfindable

‘Furthermore, Śāriputra, the bodhisattva-mahāsattva makes this reflection: The bodhisattva is only a name, because beings are unfindable. This is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva riding the Great Vehicle.

Furthermore (3): From Form up to the Buddha, All Are Only Names and All Unfindable—Eleven Tiers of Dharma Categories All Returning to Ultimate Emptiness

‘Furthermore, Śāriputra, if the bodhisattva-mahāsattva makes this reflection: Form is only a name, because form is unfindable; feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness are only names, because consciousness is unfindable. The eye is only a name, because the eye is unfindable; and so on up to the mind, which is likewise. The four foundations of mindfulness are only a name, because the four foundations of mindfulness are unfindable; and so on up to the limbs of the noble eightfold path, which are only a name, because the limbs of the noble eightfold path are unfindable. Inner emptiness is only a name, because inner emptiness is unfindable; and so on up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas, which is only a name, because the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas is unfindable; and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, which are only a name, because the eighteen unshared dharmas are unfindable. The suchness of all dharmas is only a name, because suchness is unfindable; the dharma-mark, the dharma-nature, the abiding of dharmas, and the limit of reality are only names, because the limit of reality is unfindable. Anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi (unsurpassed, right, and complete awakening) and the Buddha are only names, because the Buddha is unfindable. Thus, Śāriputra, this is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva riding the Great Vehicle.

Furthermore (4): He Perfects the Supernormal Powers, Brings Beings to Maturity, Purifies the Buddha-Worlds, Attains the Omniscience of All Kinds and Turns the Dharma Wheel, and the Buddhas of the Ten Directions Call His Name in Praise

‘Furthermore, Śāriputra, if from the time of his first arousing of the mind the bodhisattva-mahāsattva perfects the supernormal powers of a bodhisattva, brings beings to maturity, goes from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, reveres, makes offerings to, honours, and praises the Buddhas, and hears and receives the Dharma teaching from the Buddhas—this is what is called the bodhisattva's Great Vehicle. Riding this Great Vehicle, this bodhisattva goes from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, purifies the Buddha-worlds, and brings beings to maturity, and from the very beginning he has no notion of a Buddha-land and no notion of beings. This person abides in the non-dual dharma; for the sake of beings he takes on bodies, and, according to what each should receive for their deliverance, he himself manifests forms and teaches and transforms them; and so on up to omniscience, he never departs from the bodhisattva vehicle. After this bodhisattva has attained the omniscience of all kinds, he turns the Dharma wheel, which the śrāvakas, the pratyekabuddhas, and the gods, nāgas, ghosts and spirits, asuras, and the people of the world cannot turn. At that time the Buddhas of the ten directions, as many as the sands of the Ganges, all rejoice, call his name in praise, and speak thus: In such-and-such a direction, in such-and-such a land, such-and-such a bodhisattva-mahāsattva has ridden the Great Vehicle, attained the omniscience of all kinds, and turned the Dharma wheel. Śāriputra, this is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva riding the Great Vehicle.’

What follows is the treatise's explanation.

The Treatise-Author Begins His Explanation—Pūrṇa Clarified ‘Mahāsattva’ by Three Matters; the First Two Have Been Explained, and Now He Answers the Third, ‘Riding the Great Vehicle’

The treatise-author explains:

Pūrṇa uses three matters to make clear what a mahāsattva is. The first two matters have already been explained above; what is asked now is the third matter, ‘riding the Great Vehicle’, and so Pūrṇa answers it.

Someone Says: The Three Stages of Great Adornment, Arousing Great Adornment, and Riding the Great Vehicle—Divided by How Shallow or Deep the Realisation of the Two Emptinesses of Beings and of Dharmas Is

Someone says: When a bodhisattva only gives away inner and outer wealth and cannot yet break the mark of a self, this is called ‘great adornment’; if he is able to break the mark of a self and enters the emptiness of beings, but has not yet entered the emptiness of dharmas, this is called ‘arousing great adornment’. When, by way of the emptiness of beings, he enters into the emptiness of dharmas and practises the perfection of giving without seeing the three things—the giver, the receiver, and the gift—one who is able to do this is called ‘riding the Great Vehicle’. The other perfections are likewise.

The Treatise Explains, Furthermore (1): With an Unmixed Mind, Free of the Afflictions and of the Intentions of the Two Vehicles, He Cultivates the Four Foundations of Mindfulness for the Sake of Sarvajñā, and the Mark of Cultivating Is Unfindable

This bodhisattva, with an unmixed mind, far removed from all the afflictions and from the intentions of the two vehicles, cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness for the sake of sarvajñā, and the mark of cultivating too is unfindable, because of ultimate purity. This is called riding the Great Vehicle. And so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, likewise.

The Treatise Explains, Furthermore (2 and 3): He Knows That All Dharmas Are Provisional Names; Within the Coming Together of Names There Are Further Names; Worldly and World-Transcending Dharmas Alike Are Provisional Names

Furthermore, if the bodhisattva knows that all dharmas are provisional names, and that within the coming together of names there are further names; that all worldly dharmas, or world-transcending dharmas, are provisional names—this is called riding the Great Vehicle.

The Treatise Explains, Furthermore (4): Arousing Great Adornment and Perfecting the Supernormal Powers, He Rains Jewels in Offering to the Buddhas, Transforms His Bodies to Hear the Dharma, Constantly Rides the Great Vehicle, and Attains Buddhahood and Turns the Dharma Wheel

Furthermore, the bodhisattva arouses great adornment and perfects the supernormal powers of a bodhisattva; because he has perfected the supernormal powers of a bodhisattva, he brings beings to maturity, going from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land; in all the lands he passes through, he rains down lotus flowers of the seven jewels, makes offerings to the Buddhas, and rescues the beings of the three evil paths. He manifests countless bodies, each going before the Buddhas to hear and receive the Dharma teaching of the Great Vehicle; from before the Buddhas, he moves toward the mark of the Great Vehicle. Riding this Great Vehicle, he goes from one Buddha-land to another Buddha-land, brings beings to maturity, and purifies the Buddha-worlds; he does not give rise to the mark of beings and does not cling to the mark of a Buddha-land. Abiding in the ground of entering non-duality, he ferries beings across according to what each should receive for their deliverance, and for the sake of beings he takes on bodies. He constantly rides the Great Vehicle, and from the very beginning he never rests. This bodhisattva, riding the Great Vehicle, is able to become a Buddha and turn the Dharma wheel, which the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas cannot turn—how much less the rest, the petty ordinary people! The Buddhas of worlds as many as the sands of the Ganges in the ten directions all praise this bodhisattva: In such-and-such a direction, in such-and-such a land, the bodhisattva so-and-so has ridden the Great Vehicle, become a Buddha, and turned the Dharma wheel. Marks such as these are named riding the Great Vehicle.

The Treatise-Author's Conclusion—The Great Vehicle Is Called the Ultimately Pure Six Perfections; He Adorns Himself with the Five Supernormal Powers, Never Departs from the Buddhas, and So On until He Attains the Buddha-Path

Furthermore, the Great Vehicle is called the ultimately pure six perfections. When the bodhisattva-mahāsattva rides the Great Vehicle, he adorns himself with the five supernormal powers; the bodhisattva, abiding in this vehicle, in a single moment manifests countless bodies, goes to the worlds of the ten directions, makes offerings to the Buddhas, and ferries beings across to liberation. This bodhisattva never departs from the Buddhas, and so on until he attains the Buddha-path, constantly riding this Great Vehicle.

義疏Exposition

乘乘品:菩薩以『乘於大乘』釋摩訶薩——行六波羅蜜而乘檀乃至般若、不得三事用無所得故,色乃至佛但有名字畢竟不可得,論主以生法二空三階明大莊嚴、發大莊嚴、乘於大乘,不雜心離煩惱二乘意為薩婆若、大乘名畢竟清淨六波羅蜜而常乘此大乘不取所乘

在問什麼

這一品承接前一品〈大莊嚴品〉——富樓那一開口所立的三句「是菩薩大莊嚴,是菩薩發趣大乘,是菩薩乘於大乘」,前一品已就頭兩句大莊嚴與發趣大乘展開,這一品便輪到第三句「乘於大乘」。舍利弗一問「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」,富樓那便從六波羅蜜答起,收於一句「是為菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」——這一品的「大」,落在這個「乘」上。全品的幾個難處由此逼出。其一,說是乘於大乘,乘的究竟是甚麼、以甚麼為乘——既說行六度以乘大乘,何以又緊接「亦不得檀波羅蜜,亦不得菩薩,亦不得受者,用無所得故」,能乘之度、能乘之人、所度之受者一概不得,那還乘個甚麼。其二,經文一路從「色但有名字,色不可得故」推到「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字,佛不可得故」,連無上菩提與佛都但有名字、畢竟不可得,這與乘於大乘明明有所趣求,豈不相違。其三,論主釋名,引「有人言」立起大莊嚴、發大莊嚴、乘於大乘三階,這三階與前品富樓那所立的三句是不是一回事,何以又分出深淺。其四,論說「是菩薩以不雜心,離諸煩惱及二乘意,為薩婆若故」修四念處——四念處乃至十八不共法本是與二乘共修之法,何以在此又成了不共二乘的乘於大乘。這一品要回答的是這樣一件事:菩薩之名摩訶薩,在這一品落在「乘於大乘」上——所乘之大乘,論自明言即是畢竟清淨的六波羅蜜,菩薩以此六度為乘而乘之,而能乘之菩薩、所乘之度同歸「用無所得故」、同歸畢竟不可得;乘而不得所乘、行檀而不見施者受者財物三事,正是這一味不取不得,纔名乘於大乘。

逐段解明

先看富樓那這一段經文。舍利弗一問「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」,富樓那不先立所乘之乘,卻先從六波羅蜜答起:菩薩行般若時,乘於檀波羅蜜,而「亦不得檀波羅蜜,亦不得菩薩,亦不得受者,用無所得故」——所乘之度不得、能乘之菩薩不得、所度之受者不得,這纔名乘檀波羅蜜;乃至乘尸羅、羼提、毘梨耶、禪,乘般若波羅蜜亦然,收於「是為菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」。「乘」字先落在這「用無所得故」上——乘而不得所乘,方名乘於大乘。此下四段復次,層層深入。其一,摩訶衍「一心應薩婆若,修四念處,法壞故」,乃至修十八不共法法壞故,「是亦不可得」——道品之修亦不可得。其二,「菩薩但有名字,眾生不可得故」——連能行之菩薩亦但有名字。其三是全品最深一層,從「色但有名字,色不可得故」起,受想行識、眼乃至意、四念處乃至八聖道分、內空乃至無法有法空、十八不共法、諸法如、法相法性法住實際,一路推到「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字,佛不可得故」——蘊處界、道品、空、諸法實相之異名,乃至無上菩提與佛身,凡所稱名皆但有名字、畢竟不可得。其四,菩薩具足神通、成就眾生、淨佛世界而「初無佛國想,亦無眾生想」,得一切種智已轉法輪,十方諸佛稱名讚歎,總收於「是名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」——經段於此作結。

接著論主開釋。論主先牒定綱領「富樓那以三事明摩訶薩,上已說二事」,今答第三事乘於大乘。隨即引「有人言」立起三階:菩薩「直布施內外物,不能破吾我相」,是名「大莊嚴」;「若能破吾我相,入眾生空,未入法空」,是名「發大莊嚴」;「因眾生空入法空中,行檀波羅蜜」而不見施者受者財物三事,能如是者,是名「乘於大乘」——同一行檀布施,只依生空、法空證得之淺深而分三階,餘波羅蜜亦如是。此下論主釋經之四復次。釋其一,「是菩薩以不雜心,離諸煩惱及二乘意,為薩婆若故」修四念處,而「修相亦不可得,畢竟清淨故」——同一四念處,二乘取相自度,菩薩為薩婆若而修相不可得,故不共二乘。釋其二其三,「若菩薩知一切法假名字,於名字和合中復有名字」,世間出世間皆是假名。釋其四,菩薩發大莊嚴、具足神通,雨寶供佛、變身聽法,乘此大乘淨佛世界而「不生眾生相,不取佛國相」,常乘大乘、得成佛轉法輪。末後論主獨標一句要害「大乘名畢竟清淨六波羅蜜」——所乘之大乘,正是這畢竟清淨的六度;菩薩以五神通自莊嚴,變身供佛、度脫眾生,而「常不離諸佛,乃至得佛道,常乘此大乘」。全品收於這一味:所乘者畢竟清淨、畢竟不可得,而行處歷然、常乘不息。

不要讀錯

第一,不要把「乘於大乘」讀成別有一乘可乘、可得。經明說乘檀波羅蜜而「亦不得檀波羅蜜,亦不得菩薩,亦不得受者,用無所得故」——所乘之度、能乘之人、所度之受者一概不得,方名為乘。乘的不是一個實有之乘,乘而不得所乘,正是乘於大乘。

第二,不要把「色但有名字,色不可得故」乃至「佛不可得故」讀成撥無一切、乘無所乘。這一路但有名字、不可得,所遮的是執名字為實,連無上菩提與佛也不著為實有,而每一段皆收於「是名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」——正是在這畢竟不可得處立乘,不是廢去乘。

第三,不要把論主「有人言」三階讀成三事各別、互不相干。三階同是行檀布施,只依生空、法空證得之淺深而分——菩薩「不能破吾我相」但名大莊嚴,「入眾生空,未入法空」名發大莊嚴,「因眾生空入法空中」而不見施者受者財物三事,名乘於大乘,一味布施而階階深入,不是三種別行。

第四,不要把「離諸煩惱及二乘意,為薩婆若故」修四念處讀成廢棄道品、或與二乘同一。四念處乃至十八不共法本通二乘,而菩薩「為薩婆若故」修之,「修相亦不可得,畢竟清淨故」——同一道品,二乘取相自度,菩薩不取修相,故不共二乘、故名乘於大乘。

第五,不要把「常乘大乘,初無休息」以及常不離諸佛乃至得佛道,讀成有一實乘可長保而執。論自標「大乘名畢竟清淨六波羅蜜」,所常乘者即此畢竟清淨之六度——變身供佛、度脫眾生宛然不廢,而所乘畢竟清淨、不可得,行處歷然而心不著所乘。

修行作用

這一品最切近用功處,是把「乘於大乘」收到「用無所得故」、畢竟不可得這一味上。其一,乘的下手,不在別求一乘,而在行六度之時不得所乘之度、不見施者受者財物——布施如此,尸羅乃至般若亦然,行度而不得所行之度、不得能行之我,這便是乘於大乘在日用中的落處。其二,那一路「但有名字」而畢竟不可得的觀,是日用受持的把柄——色受想行識乃至無上菩提與佛,凡所稱名,知其但有名字、體不可得,於名字不生實執,纔是乘大乘而不被名字所乘。其三,論主三階提示用功的次第:先破吾我相而入眾生空,再「因眾生空入法空中」而不見三事,布施一行而生法二空俱運,不是離布施別有二空可證。其四,是那「為薩婆若故」而「修相亦不可得」的一味——修四念處乃至十八不共法宛然不廢,而心向薩婆若、不取修相,同一道品而不落二乘,這無所得而行、常乘不息,正是這一品從頭到尾的乘於大乘。

承衍

後來有古德為這一品逐文作疏,一開卷的總目便逕列「乘乘品第十六」,未另附別名。他釋「乘乘」這個複詞的字面:所謂乘乘,是「乘法乘故名乘乘也」——乘是駕御,法乘是所乘的大法,一個「乘」字兼收能乘之人與所乘之法二義,故疊稱乘乘。他並辨此品獨立設立之由:先前諸品都是舉人以釋大,說大人所乘故稱大,本品卻是「舉法釋人」,說因乘大法故名大人——視角由人轉到法。

這古德又為本品立了一重科判:品前先設一問,答則分為三段——初明乘乘,次明十方諸佛稱歎,三為總結;而初明乘乘一段又分乘乘之因與乘乘之得果二節,乘乘之因復開為乘於福慧、偏明乘慧、偏明乘功德三支。這一科判與本品經文——舍利弗問、富樓那答六度與畢竟空、末以得一切種智轉法輪、十方諸佛稱名讚歎作結——節節可以相對,是本品一份完整而可對驗的古德科判。

這古德還在前一品〈莊嚴〉的疏中前瞻引及本論之義,把大莊嚴、發趣、乘乘三句繫於生空、法空的遞進來讀:未得生法二空而行布施,但名大莊嚴;得眾生空、未得法空,名發趣;具得生法二空而行布施,方名乘乘。這一讀與本品論主「有人言」的三階逐義相合——「不能破吾我相」而但名大莊嚴,「入眾生空,未入法空」而名發大莊嚴,「因眾生空入法空中」行檀不見三事而名乘於大乘。此讀並不止一家所立,而本品經論自身並未明立生法二空這一名目,故只誌錄其說,不判定孰先孰後、是否同出一源。

這一品的品名,諸本並不一致:本論題作「乘乘」,數本都用「乘乘」二字;而所釋的那部經,數本卻題作「乘大乘」,更有古來別譯逕題為乘大乘品——「乘乘」與「乘大乘」兩名並存,各有所本,並錄而不判孰為正。又有別處的古德,明標「乘乘品」而釋乘為運出之義,說乘能運載眾生出離——其標舉品名屬實,然所引之語是義理的提要,非本品逐字的疏文,誌其標名之實而已。

把這些讀法帶回本品,最要留住的仍是那一句:菩薩之名摩訶薩,在這一品落在「乘於大乘」上,而所乘者以六度為能乘、以畢竟清淨之大乘為所乘,能乘與所乘同歸「用無所得故」、同歸畢竟不可得——名有乘乘、乘大乘之異,義只是這一味乘而不得所乘、行而不見三事。

Riding the Vehicle: ‘Mahāsattva’ Explained by the Bodhisattva’s ‘Riding the Great Vehicle’—Practising the Six Perfections, He Rides Giving and So On up to Prajñā, Not Obtaining the Three Things, Because It Is by Means of Nothing to Be Attained; Form and So On up to the Buddha Are Only Names, Ultimately Unfindable; the Treatise-Author, by Three Stages of the Twofold Emptiness of Beings and of Dharmas, Makes Clear the Great Adornment, Arousing the Great Adornment, and Riding the Great Vehicle; with an Unmixed Mind, Free of the Afflictions and of the Intent of the Two Vehicles, for the Sake of Sarvajñā; the Great Vehicle Is the Name for the Ultimately Pure Six Perfections, and He Always Rides This Great Vehicle without Grasping What Is Ridden

What Is Being Asked

This chapter carries on from the preceding chapter, “The Great Adornment.” Of the three phrases Pūrṇa set up the moment he opened his mouth, 「是菩薩大莊嚴,是菩薩發趣大乘,是菩薩乘於大乘」 tr. "this bodhisattva is greatly adorned, this bodhisattva sets out toward the Great Vehicle, this bodhisattva rides the Great Vehicle," the preceding chapter has already unfolded the first two, the great adornment and setting out toward the Great Vehicle; in this chapter it is the turn of the third phrase, “riding the Great Vehicle.” As soon as Śāriputra asks, 「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」 tr. "what is meant by the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’s riding the Great Vehicle?", Pūrṇa answers starting from the six perfections, and gathers it up in a single sentence, “this is the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’s riding the Great Vehicle”—the “great” of this chapter comes to rest on this “riding.” From this, several difficult points of the whole chapter are forced out. First, since it is called riding the Great Vehicle, what exactly is it that is ridden, and what serves as the vehicle? Since it says that one practises the six perfections so as to ride the Great Vehicle, why does it follow at once with 「亦不得檀波羅蜜,亦不得菩薩,亦不得受者,用無所得故」 tr. "he also does not obtain the perfection of giving, also does not obtain the bodhisattva, also does not obtain the recipient, because it is by means of nothing to be attained"? The perfection that rides, the person who rides, and the recipient who is carried across are all alike not obtained—what then is left to ride? Second, the sūtra text pushes all the way from 「色但有名字,色不可得故」 tr. "form is only a name, because form is unfindable" to 「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字,佛不可得故」 tr. "anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi and the Buddha are only names, because the Buddha is unfindable"; even unsurpassed awakening and the Buddha are only names, ultimately unfindable. Does this not plainly contradict riding the Great Vehicle, which evidently has something it tends toward and seeks? Third, in explaining the name, the treatise-author cites “someone says” and sets up three stages—the great adornment, arousing the great adornment, and riding the Great Vehicle. Are these three stages one and the same thing as the three phrases Pūrṇa set up in the preceding chapter, and why are depths distinguished among them once again? Fourth, the treatise says that 「是菩薩以不雜心,離諸煩惱及二乘意,為薩婆若故」 tr. "this bodhisattva, with an unmixed mind, free of the afflictions and of the intent of the two vehicles, for the sake of sarvajñā (omniscience)," cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness. The four foundations of mindfulness, and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, are originally dharmas cultivated in common with the two vehicles; why do they here become riding the Great Vehicle, which is not shared with the two vehicles? What this chapter sets out to answer is this one matter: the bodhisattva’s being named mahāsattva comes to rest, in this chapter, on “riding the Great Vehicle.” The Great Vehicle that is ridden, the treatise itself states plainly, is none other than the ultimately pure six perfections; the bodhisattva takes these six perfections as his vehicle and rides them, and yet the bodhisattva who rides and the perfections that are ridden return alike to “because it is by means of nothing to be attained,” return alike to the ultimately unfindable. Riding without obtaining what is ridden, practising giving without seeing the three things of giver, recipient, and goods—only this single flavour of not grasping and not obtaining is called riding the Great Vehicle.

Passage by Passage

First look at this passage of sūtra text spoken by Pūrṇa. As soon as Śāriputra asks “what is meant by the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’s riding the Great Vehicle,” Pūrṇa does not first set up a vehicle to be ridden, but answers starting from the six perfections: when a bodhisattva practises prajñā, he rides the perfection of giving, and yet “he also does not obtain the perfection of giving, also does not obtain the bodhisattva, also does not obtain the recipient, because it is by means of nothing to be attained”—the perfection ridden is not obtained, the bodhisattva who rides is not obtained, the recipient carried across is not obtained, and only this is called riding the perfection of giving; and so on, riding morality (śīla), patience (kṣānti), vigour (vīrya), and meditation (dhyāna), and riding the perfection of prajñā, is likewise, all gathered up in “this is the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’s riding the Great Vehicle.” The word “riding” first comes to rest on this “because it is by means of nothing to be attained”—riding without obtaining what is ridden, only this is called riding the Great Vehicle. Below this, four passages of “further” go deeper layer by layer. First, the Mahāyāna 「一心應薩婆若,修四念處,法壞故」 tr. "with one mind in accord with sarvajñā, cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness, because dharmas break down," and so on up to cultivating the eighteen unshared dharmas because dharmas break down, and “this too is unfindable”—the cultivation of the limbs of the path is itself unfindable. Second, 「菩薩但有名字,眾生不可得故」 tr. "‘bodhisattva’ is only a name, because beings are unfindable"—even the bodhisattva who practises is only a name. The third is the deepest layer of the whole chapter: starting from “form is only a name, because form is unfindable,” through feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, the eye and so on up to the mind, the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the limbs of the eightfold noble path, inner emptiness and so on up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas, the eighteen unshared dharmas, the suchness of all dharmas, the dharma-mark, the dharma-nature, the abiding of dharma, and the limit of reality, it pushes all the way to “anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi and the Buddha are only names, because the Buddha is unfindable”—the aggregates, sense-fields, and elements, the limbs of the path, emptiness, the other names for the real mark of all dharmas, and even unsurpassed awakening and the Buddha’s body: whatever is named is only a name, ultimately unfindable. Fourth, the bodhisattva is complete in supernormal powers, brings beings to maturity, and purifies buddha-worlds, and yet 「初無佛國想,亦無眾生想」 tr. "has from the first no perception of a buddha-land, and no perception of beings either"; having attained the omniscience of all kinds he turns the wheel of the Dharma, and the buddhas of the ten directions call his name and praise him; all is gathered up in “this is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’s riding the Great Vehicle”—and here the sūtra section concludes.

Next the treatise-author opens up the explanation. The treatise-author first fixes the main thread—「富樓那以三事明摩訶薩,上已說二事」 tr. "Pūrṇa makes clear the mahāsattva by three matters; two matters have already been explained above"—and now answers the third matter, riding the Great Vehicle. Straight after, he cites “someone says” and sets up three stages: the bodhisattva who 「直布施內外物,不能破吾我相」 tr. "simply gives away inner and outer things, but cannot break the mark of I and self" is called “the great adornment”; 「若能破吾我相,入眾生空,未入法空」 tr. "if he can break the mark of I and self and enters the emptiness of beings, but has not yet entered the emptiness of dharmas," this is called “arousing the great adornment”; 「因眾生空入法空中,行檀波羅蜜」 tr. "by way of the emptiness of beings he enters into the emptiness of dharmas and practises the perfection of giving," not seeing the three things of giver, recipient, and goods, and one who can be thus is called “riding the Great Vehicle.” It is one and the same practice of giving, and the three stages are distinguished solely by the shallowness or depth to which the emptiness of beings and the emptiness of dharmas have been realised; the remaining perfections are likewise. Below this comes the treatise-author’s explanation of the sūtra’s four “further” passages. Explaining the first: “this bodhisattva, with an unmixed mind, free of the afflictions and of the intent of the two vehicles, for the sake of sarvajñā,” cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness, and yet 「修相亦不可得,畢竟清淨故」 tr. "the mark of cultivation too is unfindable, because of ultimate purity"—it is the same four foundations of mindfulness, but the two vehicles grasp marks and liberate themselves, while the bodhisattva cultivates them for the sake of sarvajñā and the mark of cultivation is unfindable; hence it is not shared with the two vehicles. Explaining the second and the third: 「若菩薩知一切法假名字,於名字和合中復有名字」 tr. "if the bodhisattva knows that all dharmas are provisional names, and that within the coming together of names there are further names"—the worldly and the world-transcending are all provisional names. Explaining the fourth: the bodhisattva arouses the great adornment and is complete in supernormal powers, rains down jewels in offering to the buddhas, transforms his body to hear the Dharma, and rides this Great Vehicle to purify buddha-worlds, and yet 「不生眾生相,不取佛國相」 tr. "does not give rise to the mark of beings, and does not grasp the mark of a buddha-land"; always riding the Great Vehicle, he attains buddhahood and turns the wheel of the Dharma. At the very end the treatise-author singles out one crucial sentence on its own: 「大乘名畢竟清淨六波羅蜜」 tr. "the Great Vehicle is the name for the ultimately pure six perfections"—the Great Vehicle that is ridden is precisely these ultimately pure six perfections. The bodhisattva adorns himself with the five supernormal powers, transforms his body to make offerings to the buddhas, and liberates beings, and 「常不離諸佛,乃至得佛道,常乘此大乘」 tr. "is never apart from the buddhas, and until he attains the path of buddhahood always rides this Great Vehicle." The whole chapter is gathered into this single flavour: what is ridden is ultimately pure and ultimately unfindable, and yet the places of practice are distinct and clear, and the riding is constant and unceasing.

Do Not Misread

First, do not read “riding the Great Vehicle” as though there were some separate vehicle to be ridden and obtained. The sūtra says plainly that one rides the perfection of giving and yet “also does not obtain the perfection of giving, also does not obtain the bodhisattva, also does not obtain the recipient, because it is by means of nothing to be attained”—only when the perfection ridden, the person who rides, and the recipient carried across are all alike not obtained is it called riding. What is ridden is not a really existent vehicle; riding without obtaining what is ridden is precisely riding the Great Vehicle.

Second, do not read “form is only a name, because form is unfindable,” and so on up to “because the Buddha is unfindable,” as sweeping away everything, a riding with nothing to ride. What this whole sequence of “only a name” and “unfindable” refutes is clinging to names as real—even unsurpassed awakening and the Buddha are not held to as really existent—and yet every passage is gathered up in “this is called the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’s riding the Great Vehicle”: it is exactly here, in the ultimately unfindable, that the riding is established, not that the riding is abolished.

Third, do not read the treatise-author’s three stages of “someone says” as three separate matters that have nothing to do with one another. The three stages are alike the practice of giving, distinguished only by the shallowness or depth to which the emptiness of beings and the emptiness of dharmas have been realised: the bodhisattva who “cannot break the mark of I and self” is called only the great adornment; one who “enters the emptiness of beings, but has not yet entered the emptiness of dharmas” is called arousing the great adornment; one who “by way of the emptiness of beings enters into the emptiness of dharmas” and does not see the three things of giver, recipient, and goods is called riding the Great Vehicle. It is a single giving going deeper stage by stage, not three different practices.

Fourth, do not read cultivating the four foundations of mindfulness “free of the afflictions and of the intent of the two vehicles, for the sake of sarvajñā” as discarding the limbs of the path, or as being identical with the two vehicles. The four foundations of mindfulness, and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, are originally common to the two vehicles, but the bodhisattva cultivates them “for the sake of sarvajñā,” and “the mark of cultivation too is unfindable, because of ultimate purity.” It is the same limbs of the path, but the two vehicles grasp marks and liberate themselves, while the bodhisattva does not grasp the mark of cultivation; therefore it is not shared with the two vehicles, and therefore it is called riding the Great Vehicle.

Fifth, do not read 「常乘大乘,初無休息」 tr. "always riding the Great Vehicle, never once resting," together with never being apart from the buddhas until attaining the path of buddhahood, as though there were a real vehicle that could be kept for ever and clung to. The treatise itself declares that “the Great Vehicle is the name for the ultimately pure six perfections,” and what is always ridden is just these ultimately pure six perfections: transforming the body to make offerings to the buddhas and liberating beings are clearly not abandoned, and yet what is ridden is ultimately pure and unfindable; the places of practice are distinct and clear, and yet the mind does not attach to what is ridden.

Bearing on Practice

Where this chapter comes closest to the work of practice is in gathering “riding the Great Vehicle” into the single flavour of “because it is by means of nothing to be attained,” the ultimately unfindable. First, the starting point of riding is not to seek some other vehicle, but, while practising the six perfections, not to obtain the perfection ridden and not to see giver, recipient, or goods—so for giving, and likewise for morality and so on up to prajñā: practising a perfection without obtaining the perfection practised and without obtaining a self that practises is where riding the Great Vehicle lands in daily life. Second, that contemplation running all the way through “only a name,” ultimately unfindable, is the handle for receiving and upholding in daily life—form, feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, and so on up to unsurpassed awakening and the Buddha: whatever is named, know that it is only a name and that its substance is unfindable, and do not give rise to clinging to names as real; only then is one riding the Great Vehicle and not being ridden by names. Third, the treatise-author’s three stages point to an order for the work: first break the mark of I and self and enter the emptiness of beings, then “by way of the emptiness of beings enter into the emptiness of dharmas” and not see the three things; in the single practice of giving the twofold emptiness of beings and of dharmas operates together—it is not that there is a twofold emptiness to be realised apart from giving. Fourth is the single flavour of cultivating “for the sake of sarvajñā” while “the mark of cultivation too is unfindable”: the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas are cultivated and clearly not abandoned, yet the mind turns toward sarvajñā and does not grasp the mark of cultivation; the same limbs of the path, without falling into the two vehicles. This practising by means of nothing to be attained, riding constantly and unceasingly, is precisely the riding of the Great Vehicle of this chapter from beginning to end.

Further Resonances

Later an ancient master composed a commentary on this chapter phrase by phrase, and in the general table of contents at the opening of his commentary he lists it directly as “Chapter Sixteen, Riding the Vehicle,” without attaching any other name. He explains the literal sense of the compound “riding the vehicle”: what is called riding the vehicle is 「乘法乘故名乘乘也」 tr. "because one rides the Dharma-vehicle, it is called riding the vehicle"—riding is driving and steering, the Dharma-vehicle is the great Dharma that is ridden, and the one word “vehicle” takes in both senses, the person who rides and the Dharma that is ridden; hence it is doubled as “riding the vehicle.” He also sets out why this chapter is established on its own: the earlier chapters all took up the person in order to explain “great,” saying that it is called great because it is what a great person rides, whereas this chapter 「舉法釋人」 tr. "takes up the Dharma to explain the person," saying that one is called a great person because one rides the great Dharma—the angle of view turns from the person to the Dharma.

This ancient master also sets up a structural division for this chapter: a question is set before the chapter, and the answer is divided into three sections—first making clear riding the vehicle, next making clear the praise of the buddhas of the ten directions, and third the general conclusion; the first section, making clear riding the vehicle, is further divided into two parts, the cause of riding the vehicle and the fruit attained by riding the vehicle, and the cause of riding the vehicle again opens into three branches: riding merit and wisdom, riding wisdom in particular, and riding meritorious qualities in particular. This structural division can be set against the sūtra text of this chapter point by point—Śāriputra’s question, Pūrṇa’s answer on the six perfections and ultimate emptiness, and the conclusion with the attaining of the omniscience of all kinds, the turning of the wheel of the Dharma, and the buddhas of the ten directions calling his name and praising him; it is a complete and checkable ancient master’s structural division of this chapter.

This ancient master, in his commentary on the preceding chapter, “Adornment,” also looks ahead and cites the meaning of this treatise, reading the three phrases—great adornment, setting out, and riding the vehicle—as tied to a progression through the emptiness of beings and the emptiness of dharmas: to practise giving without having attained the twofold emptiness of beings and of dharmas is called only the great adornment; to have attained the emptiness of beings but not yet the emptiness of dharmas is called setting out; to practise giving having fully attained the twofold emptiness of beings and of dharmas is only then called riding the vehicle. This reading accords point for point with the three stages of “someone says” in this chapter’s treatise-author—one who “cannot break the mark of I and self” is called only the great adornment, one who “enters the emptiness of beings, but has not yet entered the emptiness of dharmas” is called arousing the great adornment, and one who “by way of the emptiness of beings enters into the emptiness of dharmas,” practising giving without seeing the three things, is called riding the Great Vehicle. This reading is not established by one master alone, while the sūtra and treatise of this chapter do not themselves explicitly set up the term “twofold emptiness of beings and of dharmas”; so its account is only recorded here, without judging which came first or whether they come from one and the same source.

The title of this chapter is not uniform across the editions: this treatise titles it “Riding the Vehicle,” and several editions all use these two words; the sūtra it explains, however, is titled in several editions “Riding the Great Vehicle,” and an alternative translation from ancient times titles it outright the chapter “Riding the Great Vehicle.” The two names, “Riding the Vehicle” and “Riding the Great Vehicle,” exist side by side, each with its own basis; both are recorded, without judging which is correct. Again, an ancient master elsewhere explicitly names “the chapter Riding the Vehicle” and explains “vehicle” in the sense of carrying out, saying that the vehicle is able to carry beings and bring them out to deliverance—his naming of the chapter title is factual, but the words cited are a summary of the meaning, not the verbatim commentary on this chapter; here only the fact of his naming it is recorded.

Brought back to this chapter, what is most worth keeping is still that one sentence: the bodhisattva’s being named mahāsattva comes to rest, in this chapter, on “riding the Great Vehicle,” and what is ridden takes the six perfections as that which rides and the ultimately pure Great Vehicle as that which is ridden; what rides and what is ridden return alike to “because it is by means of nothing to be attained,” return alike to the ultimately unfindable—the names differ, “riding the vehicle” and “riding the Great Vehicle,” but the meaning is only this single flavour of riding without obtaining what is ridden, practising without seeing the three things.

考據Apparatus

一、科判

本品在《大智度論》釋《大品般若》之次第中屬〈釋餘品〉一段,繫卷四十六之首,論自題「大智度論釋乘乘品第十六」〔T25 0389b02〕,所釋為《大品般若》相當之一品。

本品為卷四十六之開卷首品,緊承卷四十五末〈大莊嚴品第十五〉之後別起新卷,故本品品題後具造譯題款,題「龍樹菩薩造」〔T25 0389b04〕,其下復題「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」〔T25 0389b05〕(此與前〈斷見品〉〈大莊嚴品〉為卷中段續品、無題款者相對,型態同前〈摩訶薩品〉為卷首、有題款者)。譯者題款之朝代頭銜有異本讀法(後秦/姚秦、龜茲國三藏/三藏法師),詳第八目。

本品品名有一重須先辨之異名。就大正印本之表面品題觀之,本論題「乘乘品」、所釋經後秦鳩摩羅什譯《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》於同一位置題「乘乘品第十六」〔T08 0247a19〕,二本表面同名;然逐核兩造各自完整之校勘叢集(詳第四目、第八目),其格局實為兩造之傳本皆非一面倒,且交織互見。本論一系六本中,大正、宋、元三本讀「乘乘」核心(僅語序、有無「第十六」數字之別),明本題面亦作「乘乘品第十六」而自帶編輯性附記「經作乘大乘品」(即明本編者自陳其所對讀之經作「乘大乘」),聖本此段不作品名比對而改述本卷涵蓋範圍(釋第十五品訖第十七品上),石本讀「乘乘」而品次記「十五」、卷次記「四十八」(雙重偏移,詳第八目、本目末),宮本此卷全闕;所釋經 T223 一系六本中,大正、聖二本讀「乘乘」,宋、元、明、宮四本讀「乘大乘」。是兩造各自之底本層(本論大宋元石、所釋經大聖)皆傾「乘乘」,而所釋經之多數層(宋元明宮四本)與本論明本之編輯附語共指「乘大乘」;別有竺法護古譯《光讚經》逕題「乘大乘品第十四」〔T08 0184c26〕為第三方旁證。此一格局非「經乘大乘對論乘乘」之表面二分所能概,本目及第四目、第八目皆全幅並存兩造之傳本讀法,不偏取支持單一論斷之一側,誌錄不判。本目及以下讀者面正文仍隨本論題稱〈乘乘品〉。

本品經論為單卷內小型品,其架構為一〈經〉一〈論〉單一往復(與前〈摩訶薩品〉同為「一經一論」,異於〈斷見品〉〈大莊嚴品〉之「二經二論」),為本論〈釋餘品〉諸品中結構最單純之一型。【經】(〔T25 0389b06〕起)慧命舍利弗問富樓那「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」〔T25 0389b06〕,富樓那答,先以檀、尸羅乃至般若六度收於「是為菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」〔T25 0389b15〕,繼以五段「復次」層層開展(一心應薩婆若修四念處乃至十八不共法而法壞不可得〔T25 0389b16〕、菩薩但有名字眾生不可得〔T25 0389b20〕、色但有名字乃至阿耨菩提及佛但有名字不可得之畢竟空觀〔T25 0389b22〕、從初發意具足神通成就眾生淨佛世界乃至得一切種智轉法輪〔T25 0389c05〕、十方諸佛歡喜稱名讚歎〔T25 0389c14〕),收於經段末之總結句〔T25 0389c17〕。【論】(〔T25 0389c18〕起)先明富樓那三事之次第(大莊嚴、發趣、乘於大乘,前二已於前品說,今釋第三),繼以「有人言」立大莊嚴、發大莊嚴、乘於大乘三階釋名〔T25 0389c20〕,復以不雜心離煩惱二乘意為薩婆若〔T25 0389c25〕、一切法假名字〔T25 0390a03〕、發大莊嚴具足神通變身供佛度眾〔T25 0390a06〕、末以論主獨有之總結性「復次」明大乘即畢竟清淨六波羅蜜、常乘此大乘乃至得佛道〔T25 0390a19〕收全品。此段【論】全屬本論獨有之插入,所釋經 T223 於本品之末即轉入次品,於論段全無對應(詳第四目);本品因唯一往復,插入型態最為單純,一處插入落於全品之末(型同前〈摩訶薩品〉)。

本品全帙落於卷四十六之首,起品題〔T25 0389b02〕;卷四十六未於本品之末結卷,其下續入〈無縛無脫品第十七〉,故本品無卷尾題,範圍終點取次品〈無縛無脫品第十七〉起題〔T25 0390a24〕,不含。又本卷(卷四十六)之校勘有二重須先誌之特殊格局:其一,宮本整卷缺席——本品全部校勘記無一條列宮本為傳本,與品題附語「此卷宮本缺」逐字吻合;其二,石本品次負一、卷次正二之雙重偏移——石本自題「乘乘品十五卷四十八」,並於品末自收「釋十五品竟」,二重證據互證石本編號體系相對大正系統性偏移。二事皆詳第八目,本目先標其存在。

二、術語考

乘乘(乘於大乘·品命脈之名)。 本品得名之所繫。此「乘乘」複詞,前一「乘」為動詞(乘御、駕乘),後一「乘」為名詞(大乘之乘、所乘之法),合為「乘御大乘」之義。經以舍利弗問起「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」〔T25 0389b06〕,富樓那答之全篇皆以「是名/是為菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」為各段收束句反覆疊見(六度段〔T25 0389b15〕、菩薩但有名字段〔T25 0389b20〕、色但有名字段〔T25 0389c03〕等)。古德吉藏釋此複詞之字面義最切,云「今明乘乘則是具於人法,乘法乘故名乘乘也」〔X24 0244b10〕——謂「乘乘」兼「人」(能乘之主體)「法」(所乘之大法)二義,以乘御大法故名「乘乘」(詳第六目)。此名之「乘乘/乘大乘」跨本異讀,詳第一目、第四目、第八目。

但有名字·畢竟不可得(核心之空觀術語)。 本品義理最深之一層術語,即經復次段之「但有名字,……不可得故」句式。經云「若菩薩摩訶薩作是念:『色但有名字,色不可得故……』」〔T25 0389b22〕(底本此『』所標之念實貫下十一層法目而未即闔,收於0389c04「佛不可得故。』」,此處作節引),隨即以同一句式枚舉十一層法目——受想行識、眼乃至意、四念處乃至八聖道分、內空乃至無法有法空、十八不共法、「諸法如但有名字,如不可得故」〔T25 0389c01〕之如/法相/法性/法住/實際,終至「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字,佛不可得故」〔T25 0389c02〕。是「但有名字」者,謂諸法唯有名字施設而其自體畢竟不可得;此觀不惟遍及蘊處界、道品、空、不共法、諸法實相異名,且連「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」(無上正等正覺,修行終極之果)與「佛」本身亦同歸「但有名字、不可得」——菩提果與佛身俱收入畢竟空觀,方稱「乘於大乘」,此為本品「乘乘」義理最徹底之一層。論以「知一切法假名字,於名字和合中復有名字」〔T25 0390a03〕承此義而申之。

薩婆若·不雜心(論之修證關要)。 論釋菩薩何以乘大乘,歸於為薩婆若(一切智)故、以不雜心行之。論云「是菩薩以不雜心,離諸煩惱及二乘意,為薩婆若故」〔T25 0389c25〕——「不雜心」者,其心不雜二者:一離諸煩惱(煩惱障),二離二乘意(不墮聲聞、辟支之趣向);「為薩婆若故」者,一切修行皆為成就一切智而發,非為別果。是菩薩以此不雜之心修四念處乃至十八不共法,而「修相亦不可得,畢竟清淨故」〔T25 0390a01〕,方名乘於大乘。此「不雜心」與經復次①「一心應薩婆若」〔T25 0389b16〕相承,為論釋乘乘之修證骨幹。

大莊嚴·發大莊嚴·乘於大乘(三階釋名·品名之義理骨幹)。 論①「有人言」一段所立之三階,為本品「乘乘」得名之義理骨幹。論云「有人言:菩薩直布施內外物,不能破吾我相,是名『大莊嚴』;若能破吾我相,入眾生空,未入法空,是名『發大莊嚴』。因眾生空入法空中,行檀波羅蜜,不見三事:施者、受者、財物,能如是者,是名『乘於大乘』」〔T25 0389c20〕——三階依生空(眾生空、人無我)、法空(法無我)之得未得而分:未破吾我相(未得二空)而行施,僅名「大莊嚴」;破吾我相、入眾生空而未入法空,名「發大莊嚴」;具入生法二空、行施而三輪體空(不見施者、受者、財物三事),方名「乘於大乘」。此三階與前〈大莊嚴品〉富樓那立宗三句(大莊嚴、發趣大乘、乘於大乘)一脈相承,古德吉藏、均正皆以生法二空三階判之(詳第六目、第七目)。

三、譬喻與故事

《大智度論》以譬喻與故事著稱,然本品之論釋以義理直陳為主,於全品各品之中譬喻最為簡疏——無如前〈摩訶薩品〉之金剛喻軸、〈斷見品〉之目連故事與陰雲翳日月喻、〈大莊嚴品〉之遠行資糧破賊器仗雙喻等各別之譬喻故事。本品之教學命脈,一在「乘」(乘御、駕乘)此一貫串品名與經論之核心意象,一在論末神通變身供佛度眾之一段景象,據實誌錄如下,不強為本品比附本無之譬喻。

其一,「乘」之意象(品名與全品之喻軸)。本品品名「乘乘」、經論收束句「乘於大乘」所倚者,即「乘」(車乘、乘御)之意象——以大乘為所乘之車乘,菩薩乘御之而運載眾生趣佛道。然本品之經、論皆以「乘於大乘」為義理命題直陳,未如金剛品之就「金剛」層層開喻,故「乘」於本品正文唯為命題性意象而非展開之譬喻。此「乘」意象之古典開喻,實出古德之手——吉藏以「如人乘馬、乘舩」〔X24 0243b22〕明「能乘之人」與「所乘之法」相對而有「乘乘」(詳第六目);均正以「乘是運出義」〔X46 0642b07〕釋乘之能運載眾生出離(詳第六目)。異譯玄奘則於同一梵本段落易「乘」之意象為「擐大功德鎧」〔T05 0267c15〕之披甲意象(詳第四目)。是本品譬喻之骨在「乘」之一名,其開喻則散見於古德、異譯,本目誌此以見其實。

其二,神通變身供佛度眾之景(論·明乘大乘之相)。論末「菩薩發大莊嚴,具足菩薩神通」〔T25 0390a06〕一段,以一連景象明菩薩乘大乘之相——「所經諸國,雨七寶蓮華,供養諸佛,拔三惡道眾生。變身無數,各各至諸佛前,聽受大乘法化」〔T25 0390a07〕,繼而「乘此大乘,從一佛國至一佛國,成就眾生,淨佛世界」〔T25 0390a10〕,常乘大乘無休息乃至得成佛、轉法輪。此段雖非「如……」句式之譬喻,然以雨寶蓮華、變身無數、乘大乘遍歷佛國之景象,形象地展開菩薩乘御大乘之相,為本品論釋中最近於意象鋪陳之一段,與經段「是菩薩乘此大乘,從一佛國至一佛國,淨佛世界」〔T25 0389c08〕之神通功德段前後相應。

四、所釋經文

本論所牒之【經】段,與後秦鳩摩羅什譯《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》〈乘乘品第十六〉〔T08 0247a19–0247c05〕逐項相承。以下逐字對位,證論所釋確係此本經文;其論釋一段插入處,尤見本品義理之骨在論不在經。

第一組,品題異名(兩造傳本叢集全量並存)。本論〔T25 0389b02〕「大智度論釋乘乘品第十六」與 T223〔T08 0247a19〕「乘乘品第十六」,表面品名用字相同。然逐核兩造完整校勘(詳第八目):本論一系六本中,大正、宋、元三本讀「乘乘」核心,明本題「乘乘」而附記「經作乘大乘品」,聖本改述本卷範圍,石本讀「乘乘」而編號雙偏移,宮本此卷全闕;所釋經一系六本中,大正、聖二本讀「乘乘」,宋、元、明、宮四本讀「乘大乘」。是本論明本所附「經作乘大乘品」,正與 T223 宋元明宮四本之「乘大乘」相印,兩造獨立互證「乘乘」為兩造底本層之讀、「乘大乘」為所釋經多數層之讀。此異名之全幅格局並存於第八目,誌錄不判。

第二組,開宗問逐字近全同。本論〔T25 0389b06〕「爾時,慧命舍利弗問富樓那:『云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘?』」與 T223〔T08 0247a20〕「爾時慧命舍利弗問富樓那:『云何名菩薩摩』」(下續「訶薩乘於大乘」)逐字相承(僅逗號有無之編輯層異),為本品經論分界之整句錨點。

第三組,檀那/檀、禪那/禪之音譯詳略異文。本論全篇作「檀波羅蜜」「禪波羅蜜」,T223 全篇作「檀那波羅蜜」「禪那波羅蜜」——此為鳩摩羅什兩次譯出時音譯詳略之差異(檀那=dāna 全音譯,檀=略譯,本論慣用略譯;禪那=dhyāna 全音譯),全篇貫穿,不逐處另列。

第四組,法住/法位(義理負載異讀·跨 T223 全系交叉印證)。本論〔T25 0389c01〕「法相、法性、法住、實際但有名字」與 T223〔T08 0247b17〕「法相、法性、法位、實際但有」——本論作「法住」、T223 作「法位」。逐核兩造校勘:T223 自身此處六本一致讀「法位」(無校記);本論此處〔T25 0389c02〕之校記則本論聖本、石本讀「法位」,與 T223 全系吻合,本論僅大本、宋本讀「法住」,元本、明本兩讀並存(詳第八目)。「法位」(dharma-niyāmatā,法決定性)與「法住」(dharma-sthititā,法安住性)皆般若系「諸法如/法相/法性/法住〔法位〕/實際」諸法實相異名系列之成員,義理有別而非單純訛字。此組跨文本交叉印證強於單純品題異名,全量揭露於第八目,誌錄不判。

第五組,世界/國土之詞面異讀。本論〔T25 0389c09〕「淨佛世界,成就眾生」與 T223〔T08 0247b25〕「淨佛國土、成就眾生」——本論作「世界」、T223 作「國土」。本論此字〔T25 0389c09〕石本異文亦作「國土」(詳第八目),與 T223 主流讀法趨同,世界、國土同義(皆譯 lokadhātu/kṣetra 系語),供譯者參考,誌錄不判。

第六組,論段全屬本論獨有之插入(末端插入·T223 零對應)。本論於經段末之收束句〔T25 0389c17〕之後插入整段【論】〔T25 0389c18–0390a23〕(三事次第、有人言三階、不雜心、假名字、神通變身供佛、論主終結一段,即第二目、第五目諸釋),而 T223 於同一收束句〔T08 0247c05〕之後即接卷末,緊轉次品〈莊嚴品第十七〉,於論段全無一字之對應。是 T223〈乘乘品〉之全量〔T08 0247a19–0247c05〕恰與本論一段【經】〔T25 0389b06–0389c17〕之疆界精確重合,本論一段【論】則全落於 T223 品界之外,插入點落於全品之末(型同前〈摩訶薩品〉之論插於品末)。又,T223 次品題「莊嚴品第十七」與本論次品題「無縛無脫品第十七」完全不同——兩部漢譯自品十七起品名分歧(不屬本品範圍,誌錄供未來品十七研究參考)。

第七組,旁參異譯之核心意象分歧(乘/擐甲·方法之辨)。除逐字對讀之 T223 外,別核三種旁參異譯:其一,竺法護古譯《光讚經》〈乘大乘品第十四〉〔T08 0184c26〕,其開篇「賢者舍利弗問分耨文陀尼弗:『云何菩薩摩訶薩乘于摩訶衍?』」〔T08 0184c27〕(分耨文陀尼弗=富樓那彌多羅尼子之古譯音寫)與本品經之開篇逐義相應,其品題逕作「乘大乘」,為「乘大乘」一讀之第三方獨立來源(詳第一目、第八目)。其二,無羅叉譯《放光般若經》,本目以「乘乘品」「乘大乘品」「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」「色但有名字」四詞遍檢,皆 0 命中,放光般若於本品內容無可辨識之對應段落,誠實記錄,不強為考證。其三,玄奘譯《大般若波羅蜜多經》初分,其對應段落以「滿慈子」譯富樓那,核心意象作「擐大功德鎧」——「由諸菩薩為欲利樂一切有情,擐大功德鎧故,發趣大乘、乘大乘故,復名摩訶薩」〔T05 0267c14〕。是玄奘於同一梵本段落選以「擐甲」(saṃnāha,披甲、擐甲精進之意象)為主導譬喻,而羅什系(T223/T1509)則以「乘」(乘御、乘駕)為主導譬喻;然玄奘句中仍保留「發趣大乘、乘大乘」一語,可見底本原意兼具「乘」義。此為同一梵本段落經不同譯者選擇不同核心意象詞之顯例,供譯者參考,誌錄不判,不強判孰更貼近梵本原意。

五、般若義眼

本品之眼,在「乘於大乘」——菩薩觀諸法但有名字、畢竟不可得,以不雜之心(離煩惱及二乘意)、為薩婆若故而乘御大乘,其乘也,乘而不得所乘、不得能乘。全品唯一往復(舍利弗一問、富樓那一答,論主一釋),皆繫於般若之無所得、不可得。

其一,乘乘之乘,在乘六度而三事俱不可得。經以富樓那答,先立六度之乘,云菩薩行般若波羅蜜時「乘檀波羅蜜,亦不得檀波羅蜜,亦不得菩薩,亦不得受者,用無所得故」〔T25 0389b08〕,尸羅乃至般若五度亦如是,收於「是為菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」〔T25 0389b15〕——是所謂「乘」六波羅蜜者,乘而不得所乘之波羅蜜、不得能乘之菩薩、不得施之受者,以「用無所得故」貫之。乘而不著,方名乘於大乘。

其二,但有名字,畢竟不可得,乃至佛亦不可得。經復次段以「但有名字,……不可得故」句式,自色受想行識、眼乃至意、四念處乃至八聖道分、內空乃至無法有法空、十八不共法,遍及「諸法如但有名字,如不可得故」〔T25 0389c01〕之諸法實相異名系列,終至「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字,佛不可得故」〔T25 0389c02〕。是不惟蘊處界、道品、空性、不共法、諸法實相皆但有名字而畢竟空,連無上菩提之果與佛身自身亦同歸不可得——此乃本品畢竟空觀之極致。論承此義,云「知一切法假名字,於名字和合中復有名字;一切世間、若出世間,皆是假名」〔T25 0390a03〕,明世出世一切法皆假名施設而已。

其三,不雜心、為薩婆若,三輪體空而乘。乘大乘非徒觀空,其心有所歸、有所離。論以三階明之,具生法二空、三輪體空(不見施者、受者、財物),方名「乘於大乘」〔T25 0389c24〕;復以不雜心明之,云菩薩「以不雜心,離諸煩惱及二乘意,為薩婆若故」〔T25 0389c25〕修四念處乃至十八不共法而修相不可得、畢竟清淨——是乘大乘之心,離煩惱障、離二乘趣,一切修行皆為薩婆若(一切智)而發。故本品自六度之無所得、諸法之但有名字,以至於不雜心、為薩婆若、三輪體空,一線貫下,所歸唯在乘御大乘而不著能乘所乘、觀諸法畢竟不可得而心為一切智之般若義眼;末以論主終結一句總收之,云「大乘名畢竟清淨六波羅蜜」〔T25 0390a19〕,菩薩乘此畢竟清淨之大乘,常不離諸佛乃至得佛道。

六、諸家異釋

古德引釋本品者,此目誌錄其所疏、所引與本品之對應,不判各家詮釋。本品古德之網:吉藏《大品經義疏》逐文直疏,其支持最豐(含品目著錄、「乘馬乘舩」命名喻、「如論云」三階判、逐文疏之「乘法乘故名乘乘」與「舉法釋人」、與本品經文結構逐一對應之科判、後續諸品之「六問/乘乘人」回顧框架);慧影《大智度論疏》現存殘卷於本品之逐文疏付之闕如(品十三以下大段缺),如實記無;均正《大乘四論玄義》有一則品名標舉屬實、然引文非本品逐字之義理提要(第三型態,別於同名陷阱與逐字疏文);智顗諸著查無徵引。

吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451)之支持為本品古德之最豐者,凡三層。其一,卷首品目與逐文疏品題。卷首品目逕列「乘乘品第十六」〔X24 0195a20〕,無附加異名(異於前〈樂說品〉品目並列三重異名,本品品目僅單一品名,如實記此不對稱);逐文疏品題行以「乘乘品第十六乘乘品第十六」〔X24 0244b08〕雙重渲染同一品題。

其二,前〈辯才品〉範圍內之前瞻引用(「乘乘」得名之古德詮釋)。吉藏於前品之科判性總說中,先論「發趣」之後必有能乘所乘二端相對而生,云「次從一切名為發趣,有發趣故必有能乘之人、所乘之法,如人乘馬、乘舩,故有乘乘品同」〔X24 0243b21〕——謂「發趣」之後必有「能乘之人」與「所乘之法」二端相對,猶如人乘馬、乘船之能乘所乘關係,故繼「發趣」之後別立「乘乘品」以彰此義。復明引「如論云」而以生法二空判三階,云「如論云:未得生、法二空行施為大莊嚴,得眾生空、未得法空為發趣,具得生、法二空而行施為乘乘也。常有三解,如別疏」〔X24 0243c04〕——判「大莊嚴/發趣/乘乘」三品之得名為依生空、法空證得程度之三階:未得生法二空而行施=大莊嚴,得眾生空未得法空=發趣,具得生法二空而行施=乘乘。此三階與本品論①「有人言」之三階(第二目、第五目)逐義吻合,且用字高度接近(吉藏「未得生法二空」≈論「不能破吾我相」,「得眾生空未得法空」≈論「入眾生空,未入法空」,「具得生法二空」≈論「因眾生空入法空中」)。吉藏「如論云」所指,或即本品論①「有人言」一段、或指論主此義之通泛表述,兩者皆與本品內容高度相關,誌錄其義理吻合之事實,不強判其引文出處之字面精確。

其三,本品逐文疏之釋名與科判。吉藏釋「乘乘」複詞之字面義,云「莊嚴宜論萬行莊嚴,法身菩薩正觀具萬行故為莊嚴。發趣是始終處所,今明乘乘則是具於人法,乘法乘故名乘乘也」〔X24 0244b09〕——謂「乘乘」兼「人」(能乘之主體)「法」(所乘之大法)二義,以乘御大法故名「乘乘」;並辨此品獨立設立之由,云「今明是舉法釋人,大人以乘大法故名大人也,故出一品」〔X24 0244b12〕——先前諸品皆「舉人釋大」(大人所乘故稱大),本品則「舉法釋人」(因乘大法故稱大人),視角由人轉法。復以問答辨本品與前〈大莊嚴品〉之異,云「問:人乘於乘運萬行,與萬行莊嚴何異?答:前取萬行莊嚴於人,今明取人秉御萬行;前以法成人,此取人御法也」〔X24 0244b13〕——前品「法成人」(萬行陶鑄成就此人),本品「人御法」(此人秉持駕御萬行)。其科判本品經文,云「若階級釋則如論也。品前問,次答。答三:初明乘乘;次明為十方歎;三、總結。初中二:第一、明乘乘因;二、明乘乘得果」〔X24 0244b15〕——以「品前問、答三(初明乘乘、次為十方歎、三總結)」科本品,其「答三」與本品經文結構逐一對應(品前問對應舍利弗發問〔T25 0389b06〕,明乘乘對應六度乃至色但有名字諸段,為十方歎對應經段「十方如恒河沙等諸佛皆歡喜稱名讚歎」〔T25 0389c14〕,總結對應經段末之收束句〔T25 0389c17〕),無扞格可對,為本品獨立、完整、可驗證之古德科判材料。

吉藏復於後續各品以「乘乘」「乘乘人」回顧性標記本品在其大乘問答框架中之位置(存目誌錄,皆在本品範圍之外)。其總攝諸品為「大乘六問」,云「依通云為六問:一、問乘體;二、問乘用;三、」〔X24 0246b02〕(下列問始、問終、問中間住、問乘乘人),以本品當「乘乘人」一問;復於後品確認,云「次答第五問乘乘人。此中既標問,故乘品初有此問」〔X24 0251c04〕;末以「句義至乘乘,明菩薩摩訶薩義」〔X24 0257b11〕總結〈句義品〉(品十二)至〈乘乘品〉(本品)諸品皆明「菩薩摩訶薩義」。此三處雖不在本品正文之內,然直接以「乘乘」「乘乘人」指稱本品,構成吉藏對本品在其全書結構定位之獨立確認,存目誌錄,不作為本品正文之逐字引用材料。

慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791)之現存殘卷,於本品之逐文疏付之闕如。慧影疏原殘卷之逐文疏頭跳越品十三至品三十六一大段(含本品〈乘乘品〉),故本品之逐文疏落於此一大段缺口之內,於此殘卷中不存。本目以「乘乘品」「乘乘」遍檢慧影疏,皆 0 命中(另檢得「摩訶薩品」一處〔X46 0872c07〕,經核為前品之前瞻性提及,指向品十三,與本品無涉)。誠實記錄:本品在慧影現存殘卷中無逐文疏,如實記無,不臆稱其有。

均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784)有一則品名標舉屬實,然其引文非本品逐字。均正明標「大品經〔缺一字〕乘乘品云」(「經」「乘乘品」二字間,CBETA 底本原鈔一字漫漶不可辨)而引出一段釋義,云「乘乘品云:乘相,大乘也。乘是何義?乘是運出」〔X46 0642b07〕(下續「義,如般若能生一切得」),以「乘是運出義」釋乘之能運載眾生出離;復於後文云「乘乘則通因果也。故大品經云自從三界出至薩」〔X46 0643b16〕,延續「乘乘」概念之義理鋪展。然本目逐字核校 T223〈乘乘品〉全文〔T08 0247a19–0247c05〕與本論本品全文〔T25 0389b02–0390a24〕,皆未見「乘相」「運出」二詞之逐字對應——均正此段引文為其自身之義理提要、詮釋性轉述,非逐字牒引本品。此與前品所辨均正「同名陷阱」(詞面偶合而語境全然無關)性質不同:均正明確標舉品名「乘乘品」並將釋義繫屬本品,屬確有其實之品名指稱;然亦與吉藏之逐字疏文不同,不應等量齊觀為逐字引用。本目誠實分層記錄此一中間型態——品名引用屬實,引文內容則屬均正之義理提要,供譯者參考,不強判均正所據版本或其轉述之精確。

智顗諸著,本目承前品既建之核查方法遍檢「乘乘品」「乘乘」,皆 0 命中。如實記錄:未見智顗以任何形式徵引本品,不強採、不臆造。

七、互讀與承衍

本品之骨有三,皆為般若一系及後出諸疏所承。

其一,富樓那三句、三品一貫之承——本品〈乘乘品〉即富樓那立宗三句(大莊嚴、發趣大乘、乘於大乘)之第三句「乘於大乘」,承前〈大莊嚴品〉之前二句(大莊嚴、發趣)而來,論①開宗即自標「富樓那以三事明摩訶薩,上已說二事,今問第三事『乘於大乘』」〔T25 0389c18〕。古德吉藏、均正各以生空、法空之得未得判此三句為三階:吉藏云「如論云:未得生、法二空行施為大莊嚴,得眾生空、未得法空為發趣,具得生、法二空而行施為乘乘也」〔X24 0243c04〕,均正亦以「乘乘則通因果也」〔X46 0643b16〕承此三概念而鋪展。是本品三句立宗之義理架構,古德以獨立(或共源)之三階框架承而判之。本目誌其相承,不代為定讀,所繫諸出處皆見第四目、第六目逐字之載。

其二,「乘乘」複詞(人法、能乘所乘)之承——本品論主以三事、三階明「乘於大乘」,古德吉藏承之而釋「乘乘」複詞之字面義。吉藏以「今明乘乘則是具於人法,乘法乘故名乘乘也」〔X24 0244b10〕釋其兼「人」(能乘)「法」(所乘)二義,以「如人乘馬、乘舩」〔X24 0243b22〕開「能乘之人、所乘之法」之喻,以「此取人御法也」〔X24 0244b15〕辨本品「人御法」異於前品「法成人」。異譯玄奘則於同一梵本段落易「乘」(乘御)之意象為「擐大功德鎧」〔T05 0267c15〕之披甲意象,是同一梵本段落經異譯者選異核心意象。本目誌其相承,不代為定讀,所繫諸出處皆見第四目、第六目逐字之載。

其三,「但有名字、畢竟不可得」畢竟空觀之承——本品經復次段以「但有名字,……不可得故」句式遍枚十一層法目,遍及諸法實相異名而終至「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字,佛不可得故」〔T25 0389c02〕,論承之而云「知一切法假名字,於名字和合中復有名字;一切世間、若出世間,皆是假名」〔T25 0390a03〕。此「一切法但有名字、畢竟不可得」之畢竟空觀,為般若一系貫通之義,本品以「連菩提果與佛身亦不可得」為其極致。本目誌其相承,不代為定讀,所繫諸出處皆見第二目、第四目、第五目逐字之載。

就本論次第言,本品有內部互讀之明文,係論主自繫。論①開宗自繫前品之二事為所承,云「富樓那以三事明摩訶薩,上已說二事,今問第三事『乘於大乘』」〔T25 0389c18〕——論主自標本品所釋之「乘於大乘」為富樓那三事之第三,承前品已說之大莊嚴、發趣二事而下。此義脈之自繫,本目誌其相承,不代為定讀。

八、校本與版本說明

本品校勘可與經義相涉者,擇要如下;異本讀法並列保存,正文仍從現行底本讀法。本卷(卷四十六)有二重須先誌之特殊格局——宮本整卷缺席、石本品次卷次雙重偏移,二事詳本目末段。

0389b02(品題·兩造傳本全量並存):(大智度論釋乘乘品第十六〔卷第四十六〕)十六字【大】|大智度論卷第四十六第十六品釋乘乘品【宋】【元】|大智度論卷第四十六釋乘乘品第十六經作乘大乘品【明】|大智度經論卷第四十六釋第十五品訖第十七品上【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第十五乘乘品十五卷四十八【石】|此卷宮本缺——本論一系六本中,大正、宋、元三本讀「乘乘品」核心(僅語序、有無「第十六」數字之別),明本題面亦作「乘乘品第十六」而自帶編輯性附記「經作乘大乘品」(即明本編者自陳其所對讀之經作「乘大乘」),聖本此段不作品名比對而改述本卷涵蓋範圍(釋第十五品訖第十七品上),石本讀「乘乘」而品次記「十五」、卷次記「四十八」(雙重偏移,詳本目末),宮本此卷全闕。與所釋經 T223 之品題形成對照——T223 大正底本讀「乘乘」,其校記作 乘乘【大】|乘大乘【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(別有 T223 原校腳註「乘乘=乘大乘〔三〕〔宮〕」,〔三〕即宋元明合稱),即 T223 六本中僅大正、聖二本讀「乘乘」,宋、元、明、宮四本讀「乘大乘」。是兩造之底本層(本論大宋元石、所釋經大聖)皆傾「乘乘」,所釋經之多數層(宋元明宮四本)與本論明本之編輯附語共指「乘大乘」;別有竺法護古譯《光讚經》逕題「乘大乘品第十四」〔T08 0184c26〕為第三方旁證(詳第一目、第四目)。正文從底本「乘乘品」。

0389b05(譯者頭銜):後秦龜茲國三藏【大】|姚秦三藏法師【宋】【元】【明】——「後秦」「姚秦」為同一政權之異稱,「龜茲國三藏」「三藏法師」為頭銜表述之異,非實質內容分歧,純屬編輯層慣用語之異,誌錄不判。正文從底本「後秦龜茲國三藏」。

0389b06(經段起標籤):【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【聖】——宋本、聖本於經段起始處不明標「【經】」字樣(或徑以文意分段),不影響內容,供譯者參考。與論段起標籤 0389c18 【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【聖】 呼應同型(宋本、聖本於論段起始處亦不明標「【論】」),二本或另有分段慣例,誌錄不判。

0389b18(虛詞脫漏):法【大】|〔-〕【石】——「修十八不共法,法壞故」句中石本闕一「法」字,屬石本一貫之簡省型態(詳本目末石本偏移條),純屬技術性脫漏,誌錄不判。正文從底本「法」。

0389c02(法住/法位·義理負載·跨 T223 全系印證):法住【大】|法位【聖】【石】|法住法位【元】【明】(宋本此處未別出異文,從底本讀「法住」,即「法住」為大、宋二本之讀)——「法相、法性、法住、實際但有名字」句之「法住」(第四目第四組)。本論六本中大、宋二本讀「法住」,聖、石二本讀「法位」,元、明二本兩讀並存(法住法位);聖、石之「法位」與所釋經 T223 全系(六本一致)之「法位」〔T08 0247b17〕逐字吻合。「法位」(dharma-niyāmatā,法決定性)與「法住」(dharma-sthititā,法安住性)皆般若系諸法實相異名系列(諸法如/法相/法性/法住〔法位〕/實際)之成員,義理有別而非單純訛字,此為本品唯一同時具「跨 T223 全系印證」與「本論系內分歧」雙重證據之義理負載異文,供譯者參考,誌錄不判。正文從底本「法住」。

0389c09(世界/國土):世界【大】*|國土【石】*(「*」為 CBETA 標記,示此型異文之呼應)——「淨佛世界,成就眾生」句(第四目第五組)。底本作「世界」,石本作「國土」,與所釋經 T223 主流讀法「國土」〔T08 0247b25〕相合,世界、國土同義(皆譯 lokadhātu/kṣetra 系語)並存,誌錄不判。正文從底本「世界」。

0390a20(技術性異文):大乘【大】|於大乘【石】|乘【聖】——「菩薩摩訶薩乘大乘時」句之「大乘」,石本作「於大乘」、聖本作「乘」,屬虛詞增減層之技術異文,與義理無涉,誌錄不判。正文從底本「大乘」。

本卷二重特殊格局,並誌如下。其一,宮本整卷缺席——本品全部校勘記(自品題 0389b02 至品末 0390a23 諸條)無一條列宮本為傳本,與品題附語「此卷宮本缺」〔0389b02〕逐字吻合,即整部卷四十六(含本品全文及品十七前段)之宮本傳世抄本闕如,非個別異文而係整卷佚失(此與前〈大莊嚴品〉宮本讀「辯才品」者不同型——彼卷四十五宮本尚存而讀異名,本卷宮本全缺,勿混)。其二,石本品次負一、卷次正二之雙重偏移——石本於本品題自報「乘乘品十五卷四十八」〔0389b02〕,即品次記「十五」(較大正本「第十六」少一)、卷次記「四十八」(較大正本「卷四十六」多二);復於品末自收,校記作 大乘【大】|大乘釋十五品竟【石】〔0390a23〕,即石本於「常乘此大乘」句末附「釋十五品竟」,與其品題自報之「乘乘品十五」互證石本編為「品十五」。又,本論惯例於品末所附之「釋第某品竟」收尾註,於本品範圍內大正本無(大正本此收尾記事延後標記於品十七範圍〔0393a29〕,作「解釋第十六品竟」,石本則於彼處自收「品十六」對應大正本之品十七),即石本編號體系相對大正本系統性偏移負一(石本之品次恆較大正本少一)。石本此雙重偏移與前〈大莊嚴品〉石本編號偏移(彼題「大誓莊嚴品十四」偏移負一)同源,本卷另具卷次正二之特點,成因未強考,誌錄不判。

0389c25(術語核心詞·鄰字重出):雜【大】|離【宋】——「是菩薩以不〔雜〕心,離諸煩惱及二乘意」句,其「雜」字為第二目「不雜心」術語之所繫。底本作「不雜心」,宋本作「不離心」——「離」蓋涉下句「離諸煩惱」之「離」字而重出(鄰字重寫),非別立一讀;「不雜心」(心不雜煩惱與二乘意,第二目)之義理判釋不因此改,誌錄不判。正文從底本「雜」。

本品全帙校勘記逐條核校,扣除品題校記、上列義理負載與標籤諸條外,其餘各條均屬虛詞有無之增減(如0389b09得字、0389b15是/是名、0389b22若字、0389c04如是、0389c18已字、0390a01故字、0390a01相字等)或同音假借字(如0390a08經/逕)、鄰字重出(如0389c25離/故離)等之技術性異文,逐條核校未見義理層改變,故不逐條展開,僅統計性帶過。

本品底本為《大智度論》卷四十六〔T25 0389b02–0390a24〕,本品為卷四十六之開卷首品,故品題後具造譯題款;卷四十六未於本品之末結卷(續入〈無縛無脫品第十七〉),故本品無卷尾題,範圍終點取次品〈無縛無脫品第十七〉起題〔T25 0390a24〕,不含。所釋經校本為《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》〈乘乘品第十六〉〔T08 0247a19–0247c05〕(其品題大聖二本讀「乘乘」、宋元明宮四本讀「乘大乘」,詳第一目)。旁參異譯有竺法護《光讚經》(T08n0222·「乘大乘品第十四」)、無羅叉《放光般若經》(T08n0221·本品內容 0 命中)、玄奘《大般若波羅蜜多經》初分(T05n0220a·核心意象作「擐大功德鎧」,第四目第七組)。古德疏校本為吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451·本品支持最豐),別有慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791·本品逐文疏缺)、均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784·一則品名標舉屬實、引文非逐字之義理提要)。異讀校記依大正校勘,涉大正底本與宋、元、明、宮、聖、石諸本之異(本卷宮本全缺)。本品全帙校勘記詳存工作底本檔末;本表僅傳錄與本品核心義理措辭相涉之要目,不延伸為各本高下之判。

I. Structural Placement

Within the sequence in which the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa comments on the Larger Sūtra, this chapter belongs to the section of the Commentary on the Remaining Chapters and stands at the head of Fascicle 46. The treatise gives its own title as 「大智度論釋乘乘品第十六」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, the Sixteenth"〔T25 0389b02〕, and what it comments on is the corresponding chapter of the Larger Sūtra.

This chapter is the opening chapter of Fascicle 46. It follows directly on Chapter 15, "The Great Adornment", at the end of Fascicle 45, and begins a new fascicle; therefore after the chapter title it carries the colophon of authorship and translation, reading 「龍樹菩薩造」 tr. "composed by the Bodhisattva Nāgārjuna"〔T25 0389b04〕, and below that 「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」 tr. "translated by Kumārajīva, Tripiṭaka master of the Kingdom of Kucha, Later Qin"〔T25 0389b05〕 (this stands in contrast to the preceding "Cutting Off Views" and "The Great Adornment", which are continuing chapters in the middle of a fascicle and carry no colophon, and is of the same type as the earlier "Mahāsattva", which opens a fascicle and carries a colophon). The dynasty and title in the translator's colophon have variant readings among the editions (Later Qin / Yao Qin; Tripiṭaka master of the Kingdom of Kucha / Tripiṭaka Dharma master); see Section VIII.

The chapter's name has one layer of variant naming that must first be sorted out. Judging by the surface chapter titles of the printed Taishō edition, this treatise titles it 「乘乘品」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle", and the sūtra it explains, the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra translated by Kumārajīva of the Later Qin, titles the same position 「乘乘品第十六」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, the Sixteenth"〔T08 0247a19〕: on the surface the two texts bear the same name. Yet when the complete collation clusters of each side are checked one by one (see Sections IV and VIII), the pattern is in fact that the transmitted editions of neither side lean all one way, and the two interweave. Among the six editions of this treatise's line, the Taishō, Song, and Yuan read the core 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" (differing only in word order and in whether the numeral 「第十六」 tr. "the Sixteenth" is present); the Ming edition's title likewise reads 「乘乘品第十六」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, the Sixteenth", but carries its own editorial note, 「經作乘大乘品」 tr. "the sūtra has ‘Chapter on Riding the Great Vehicle’" (that is, the Ming editor states that the sūtra he read against it has 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle"); the Shōgozō at this point makes no comparison of chapter names but instead describes the range covered by the fascicle (explaining from Chapter 15 through the first part of Chapter 17); the Ishiyama text reads 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" but records the chapter number as 「十五」 tr. "fifteen" and the fascicle number as 「四十八」 tr. "forty-eight" (a double displacement; see Section VIII and the end of this section); and the Palace edition lacks this fascicle entirely. Among the six editions of the line of the sūtra explained, T223, the Taishō and Shōgozō read 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle", while the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace read 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle." Thus the base-text layers of each side (this treatise's Taishō, Song, Yuan, and Ishiyama; the sūtra's Taishō and Shōgozō) all lean to 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle", while the majority layer of the sūtra explained (the four editions Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace) and the editorial note of this treatise's Ming edition together point to 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle"; in addition, Dharmarakṣa's ancient translation, the Praise of Light Prajñāpāramitā, directly titles it 「乘大乘品第十四」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Great Vehicle, the Fourteenth"〔T08 0184c26〕, as third-party corroboration. This pattern cannot be summed up by the surface dichotomy 「經乘大乘對論乘乘」 tr. "the sūtra's ‘riding the Great Vehicle’ against the treatise's ‘riding the vehicle’"; this section, and Sections IV and VIII, all set out in full the transmitted readings of both sides, without favouring the side that supports any single conclusion, and record them without judgement. In this section and in the reader-facing text below, the chapter continues to be called "Riding the Vehicle", following this treatise's title.

The Sūtra and Treatise of this chapter make a small chapter within a single fascicle, and its framework is a single alternation of one Sūtra section and one Treatise section (like the earlier "Mahāsattva", it is 「一經一論」 tr. "one sūtra section, one treatise section", unlike the 「二經二論」 tr. "two sūtra sections, two treatise sections" of "Cutting Off Views" and "The Great Adornment"); it is the structurally simplest type among the chapters of this treatise's Commentary on the Remaining Chapters. In the Sūtra (beginning at〔T25 0389b06〕), the venerable Śāriputra asks Pūrṇa 「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」 tr. "what is called a bodhisattva-mahāsattva's riding the Great Vehicle?"〔T25 0389b06〕, and Pūrṇa answers. First he gathers the six perfections, from giving and morality up to prajñā, under 「是為菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」 tr. "this is a bodhisattva-mahāsattva's riding the Great Vehicle"〔T25 0389b15〕; then in five 「復次」 tr. "furthermore" sections he unfolds it layer upon layer (with one mind in accord with sarvajñā (omniscience), cultivating the four foundations of mindfulness up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, while the dharmas are destroyed and cannot be found〔T25 0389b16〕; the bodhisattva has only a name, and beings cannot be found〔T25 0389b20〕; the contemplation of ultimate emptiness in which form has only a name, and so on up to anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi and the Buddha having only names and not being findable〔T25 0389b22〕; from the first arousing of intent, being complete in the supernormal powers, bringing beings to maturity and purifying the buddha-world, up to attaining the omniscience of all kinds and turning the Dharma wheel〔T25 0389c05〕; and the Buddhas of the ten directions rejoicing, calling his name, and praising him〔T25 0389c14〕), and he closes with the summarising sentence at the end of the Sūtra section〔T25 0389c17〕. In the Treatise (beginning at〔T25 0389c18〕), it first makes clear the sequence of Pūrṇa's three matters (the great adornment, setting out, and riding the Great Vehicle; the first two were explained in the preceding chapter, and now the third is explained); next, with 「有人言」 tr. "some say", it sets up three stages of naming—the great adornment, arousing the great adornment, and riding the Great Vehicle〔T25 0389c20〕; then the unmixed mind, free of the afflictions and of the intentions of the two vehicles, for the sake of sarvajñā〔T25 0389c25〕; all dharmas as provisional names〔T25 0390a03〕; arousing the great adornment, being complete in the supernormal powers, transforming the body, making offerings to the Buddhas, and liberating beings〔T25 0390a06〕; and finally, with a summarising 「復次」 tr. "furthermore" that belongs to the treatise-author alone, it makes clear that the Great Vehicle is the ultimately pure six perfections, and that one constantly rides this Great Vehicle up to attaining the Buddha path〔T25 0390a19〕, closing the whole chapter. This Treatise section is wholly an insertion unique to this treatise; the sūtra explained, T223, passes at the end of this chapter directly into the next chapter and has no correspondence at all to the Treatise section (see Section IV). Because this chapter has only one alternation, its type of insertion is the simplest: the one insertion falls at the end of the whole chapter (of the same type as the earlier "Mahāsattva").

This whole chapter falls at the head of Fascicle 46, beginning with the chapter title〔T25 0389b02〕. Fascicle 46 does not close at the end of this chapter but continues into Chapter 17, "Neither Bound nor Freed", so this chapter has no fascicle-end title, and the end point of its range is taken at the opening title of the next chapter, Chapter 17, "Neither Bound nor Freed"〔T25 0390a24〕, exclusive. Further, the collation of this fascicle (Fascicle 46) has two special features that must first be noted. First, the Palace edition is absent for the whole fascicle: not a single note in the entire collation of this chapter lists the Palace edition as a witness, which agrees word for word with the note attached to the chapter title, 「此卷宮本缺」 tr. "this fascicle is missing in the Palace edition." Second, the Ishiyama text has a double displacement, chapter number minus one and fascicle number plus two: the Ishiyama text titles itself 「乘乘品十五卷四十八」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, fifteen; fascicle forty-eight", and at the end of the chapter closes on its own with 「釋十五品竟」 tr. "end of the explanation of the fifteenth chapter"; the two pieces of evidence confirm each other that the Ishiyama numbering system is systematically displaced relative to the Taishō. Both matters are detailed in Section VIII; this section first marks that they exist.

II. Terms Examined

Riding the vehicle (riding the Great Vehicle: the name of the chapter's lifeline). This is what the chapter's name hangs on. In the compound 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle", the first 「乘」 tr. "ride" is a verb (to drive, to ride), and the second 「乘」 tr. "vehicle" is a noun (the vehicle of the Great Vehicle, the dharma that is ridden); together they mean 「乘御大乘」 tr. "driving the Great Vehicle." The sūtra opens with Śāriputra's question, 「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」 tr. "what is called a bodhisattva-mahāsattva's riding the Great Vehicle?"〔T25 0389b06〕, and throughout Pūrṇa's answer 「是名/是為菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」 tr. "this is called / this is a bodhisattva-mahāsattva's riding the Great Vehicle" recurs again and again as the closing sentence of each section (the section on the six perfections〔T25 0389b15〕, the section on the bodhisattva having only a name〔T25 0389b20〕, the section on form having only a name〔T25 0389c03〕, and so on). Among the ancient masters, Jizang explains the literal sense of this compound most closely, saying 「今明乘乘則是具於人法,乘法乘故名乘乘也」 tr. "now it makes clear that ‘riding the vehicle’ is complete in both person and dharma: because one rides the dharma-vehicle it is called ‘riding the vehicle’"〔X24 0244b10〕—that is, 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" carries the two senses of 「人」 tr. "person" (the subject who rides) and 「法」 tr. "dharma" (the great dharma that is ridden), and because one drives the great dharma it is called 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" (see Section VI). For the cross-edition variant of this name, 「乘乘/乘大乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle / riding the Great Vehicle", see Sections I, IV, and VIII.

Only names; ultimately not to be found (the core term of the contemplation of emptiness). This is the doctrinally deepest layer of terminology in the chapter, namely the sentence pattern 「但有名字,……不可得故」 tr. "there are only names ... because it cannot be found" in the sūtra's "furthermore" sections. The sūtra says 「若菩薩摩訶薩作是念:『色但有名字,色不可得故……』」 tr. "if a bodhisattva-mahāsattva thinks thus: ‘form has only a name, because form cannot be found ...’"〔T25 0389b22〕 (in the base text, the thought marked off here by the inner quotation marks in fact runs on through the eleven layers of dharma-categories below without closing at once, and closes at 0389c04 with 「佛不可得故。』」 tr. "because the Buddha cannot be found.’"; here it is quoted in abridgement). Immediately after, with the same sentence pattern, it enumerates eleven layers of dharma-categories—feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness; the eye up to the mind; the four foundations of mindfulness up to the limbs of the eightfold noble path; inner emptiness up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas; the eighteen unshared dharmas; and suchness, the mark of dharmas, the nature of dharmas, the abiding of dharmas, and the limit of reality in 「諸法如但有名字,如不可得故」 tr. "the suchness of dharmas has only a name, because suchness cannot be found"〔T25 0389c01〕—and ends at 「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字,佛不可得故」 tr. "anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi and the Buddha have only names, because the Buddha cannot be found"〔T25 0389c02〕. 「但有名字」 tr. "Only names" means that dharmas have only the designation of names, while their own substance ultimately cannot be found. This contemplation not only extends over the aggregates, sense-fields, and elements, the limbs of the path, emptiness, the unshared dharmas, and the different names of the real mark of all dharmas; even 「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」 tr. "anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi" (unsurpassed, right, and complete awakening, the ultimate fruit of practice) and the 「佛」 tr. "Buddha" himself alike return to 「但有名字、不可得」 tr. "only names, not to be found." Only when the fruit of awakening and the Buddha's body are both gathered into the contemplation of ultimate emptiness is it called 「乘於大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle"; this is the most thoroughgoing layer of the meaning of 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" in this chapter. The treatise takes up this meaning and extends it with 「知一切法假名字,於名字和合中復有名字」 tr. "knowing that all dharmas are provisional names, and that within the coming together of names there are further names"〔T25 0390a03〕.

Sarvajñā; the unmixed mind (the crux of practice and realisation in the treatise). In explaining why the bodhisattva rides the Great Vehicle, the treatise comes down to its being for the sake of sarvajñā (omniscience) and practised with the unmixed mind. The treatise says 「是菩薩以不雜心,離諸煩惱及二乘意,為薩婆若故」 tr. "this bodhisattva, with the unmixed mind, free of all afflictions and of the intentions of the two vehicles, for the sake of sarvajñā"〔T25 0389c25〕. 「不雜心」 tr. "The unmixed mind" is a mind not mixed with two things: first, it is free of all afflictions (the obstruction of afflictions); second, it is free of the intentions of the two vehicles (it does not fall into the aims of the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas). 「為薩婆若故」 tr. "For the sake of sarvajñā" means that all practice is undertaken to accomplish omniscience, not for some other fruit. This bodhisattva, with this unmixed mind, cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, and yet 「修相亦不可得,畢竟清淨故」 tr. "the mark of cultivating too cannot be found, because of ultimate purity"〔T25 0390a01〕; only then is it called riding the Great Vehicle. This 「不雜心」 tr. "unmixed mind" continues the sūtra's "furthermore" ①, 「一心應薩婆若」 tr. "with one mind in accord with sarvajñā"〔T25 0389b16〕, and is the backbone of practice and realisation in the treatise's explanation of riding the vehicle.

The great adornment; arousing the great adornment; riding the Great Vehicle (three stages of naming: the doctrinal backbone of the chapter name). The three stages set up in the 「有人言」 tr. "some say" passage of Treatise ① are the doctrinal backbone by which this chapter gets the name 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle." The treatise says 「有人言:菩薩直布施內外物,不能破吾我相,是名『大莊嚴』;若能破吾我相,入眾生空,未入法空,是名『發大莊嚴』。因眾生空入法空中,行檀波羅蜜,不見三事:施者、受者、財物,能如是者,是名『乘於大乘』」 tr. "Some say: when a bodhisattva simply gives inner and outer things but cannot break the mark of I and self, this is called ‘the great adornment’; if he can break the mark of I and self and enters the emptiness of beings but has not yet entered the emptiness of dharmas, this is called ‘arousing the great adornment.’ When, by way of the emptiness of beings, he enters into the emptiness of dharmas and practises the perfection of giving without seeing the three things—giver, receiver, and goods—one who can be thus is called ‘riding the Great Vehicle’"〔T25 0389c20〕. The three stages are divided according to whether the emptiness of beings (the emptiness of sentient beings, the selflessness of persons) and the emptiness of dharmas (the selflessness of dharmas) have or have not been attained. Giving without having broken the mark of I and self (not having attained the two emptinesses) is called only 「大莊嚴」 tr. "the great adornment"; breaking the mark of I and self and entering the emptiness of beings but not yet the emptiness of dharmas is called 「發大莊嚴」 tr. "arousing the great adornment"; only entering fully both emptinesses, of beings and of dharmas, and giving with the threefold sphere empty in substance (not seeing the three things—giver, receiver, and goods) is called 「乘於大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle." These three stages continue in one line the three phrases with which Pūrṇa set up the thesis in the preceding "The Great Adornment" (the great adornment, setting out toward the Great Vehicle, riding the Great Vehicle), and among the ancient masters both Jizang and Junzheng judge them as three stages of the two emptinesses of beings and of dharmas (see Sections VI and VII).

III. Similes and Stories

The Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa is renowned for its similes and stories, but the treatise's explanation in this chapter is mainly direct statement of doctrine, and among all the chapters it is the sparsest in similes: there is nothing like the separate similes and stories of the earlier chapters—the vajra simile running as an axis through "Mahāsattva", the story of Maudgalyāyana and the simile of clouds veiling the sun and moon in "Cutting Off Views", or the double simile of provisions for a long journey and weapons for defeating bandits in "The Great Adornment". The lifeline of this chapter's teaching lies, first, in the core image of 「乘」 tr. "vehicle" (driving, riding) that runs through the chapter name and through Sūtra and Treatise, and second, in the scene near the end of the Treatise of supernormal powers, transformed bodies, offerings to the Buddhas, and the liberation of beings. They are recorded below according to the facts, without forcing onto this chapter similes it does not have.

First, the image of 「乘」 tr. "vehicle" (the simile-axis of the chapter name and of the whole chapter). What the chapter name 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" and the closing sentence of Sūtra and Treatise, 「乘於大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle", rely on is the image of 「乘」 tr. "vehicle" (a carriage; driving)—the Great Vehicle taken as the carriage that is ridden, which the bodhisattva drives to carry beings toward the Buddha path. Yet the Sūtra and Treatise of this chapter both state 「乘於大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle" directly as a doctrinal proposition, and do not, as the vajra chapter does with 「金剛」 tr. "vajra", open the simile layer by layer; so in the main text of this chapter 「乘」 tr. "vehicle" is only a propositional image and not an unfolded simile. The classical opening of the 「乘」 tr. "vehicle" image into a simile in fact comes from the hands of the ancient masters: Jizang, with 「如人乘馬、乘舩」 tr. "as a person rides a horse or rides a boat"〔X24 0243b22〕, makes clear that 「能乘之人」 tr. "the person who rides" and 「所乘之法」 tr. "the dharma that is ridden" stand over against each other, and so there is 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" (see Section VI); Junzheng, with 「乘是運出義」 tr. "vehicle means conveying out"〔X46 0642b07〕, explains that the vehicle can carry beings out to liberation (see Section VI). In a different translation, Xuanzang, for the same passage of the Sanskrit text, changes the image of 「乘」 tr. "vehicle" to the image of putting on armour, 「擐大功德鎧」 tr. "donning the great armour of merit"〔T05 0267c15〕 (see Section IV). So the bone of this chapter's simile lies in the single name 「乘」 tr. "vehicle", and its opening into a simile is scattered among the ancient masters and the different translation; this section notes this to show how things actually stand.

Second, the scene of supernormal powers, transformed bodies, offerings to the Buddhas, and the liberation of beings (Treatise: making clear the mark of riding the Great Vehicle). The passage near the end of the Treatise, 「菩薩發大莊嚴,具足菩薩神通」 tr. "the bodhisattva arouses the great adornment and is complete in the bodhisattva's supernormal powers"〔T25 0390a06〕, makes clear the mark of the bodhisattva's riding the Great Vehicle with a sequence of scenes—「所經諸國,雨七寶蓮華,供養諸佛,拔三惡道眾生。變身無數,各各至諸佛前,聽受大乘法化」 tr. "in the lands he passes through he rains down lotus flowers of the seven jewels, makes offerings to the Buddhas, and draws out the beings of the three evil paths. He transforms his body without number, and each goes before the Buddhas to hear and receive the teaching of the Great Vehicle Dharma"〔T25 0390a07〕—and then 「乘此大乘,從一佛國至一佛國,成就眾生,淨佛世界」 tr. "riding this Great Vehicle, from one buddha-land to another buddha-land, he brings beings to maturity and purifies the buddha-world"〔T25 0390a10〕, constantly riding the Great Vehicle without rest, up to attaining buddhahood and turning the Dharma wheel. Although this passage is not a simile in the sentence pattern 「如……」 tr. "like ...", through its scenes of raining jewelled lotus flowers, transforming the body without number, and riding the Great Vehicle through buddha-land after buddha-land, it unfolds vividly the mark of the bodhisattva's driving the Great Vehicle. It is the passage in this chapter's Treatise that comes closest to a laying-out of imagery, and it answers, before and after, to the Sūtra's section on the merits of supernormal power, 「是菩薩乘此大乘,從一佛國至一佛國,淨佛世界」 tr. "this bodhisattva, riding this Great Vehicle, from one buddha-land to another buddha-land, purifies the buddha-world"〔T25 0389c08〕.

IV. The Sūtra Passage Explained

The Sūtra section cited by this treatise follows item by item Chapter 16, "Riding the Vehicle"〔T08 0247a19–0247c05〕, of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra translated by Kumārajīva of the Later Qin. Below, the two are aligned word by word to prove that what the treatise explains is indeed this sūtra text; the place where the one Treatise section is inserted shows especially that the bone of this chapter's doctrine lies in the treatise and not in the sūtra.

First group: variant chapter names (the complete collation clusters of both sides' editions set side by side). This treatise's〔T25 0389b02〕 「大智度論釋乘乘品第十六」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, the Sixteenth" and T223's〔T08 0247a19〕 「乘乘品第十六」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, the Sixteenth" use the same characters for the chapter name on the surface. Yet when the complete collations of both sides are checked (see Section VIII): among the six editions of this treatise's line, the Taishō, Song, and Yuan read the core 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle"; the Ming titles it 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" but adds the note 「經作乘大乘品」 tr. "the sūtra has ‘Chapter on Riding the Great Vehicle’"; the Shōgozō instead describes the range of the fascicle; the Ishiyama text reads 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" but its numbering is doubly displaced; and the Palace edition lacks this fascicle entirely. Among the six editions of the line of the sūtra explained, the Taishō and Shōgozō read 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle", and the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace read 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle." Thus the 「經作乘大乘品」 tr. "the sūtra has ‘Chapter on Riding the Great Vehicle’" attached to this treatise's Ming edition matches exactly the 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle" of T223's Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace editions; the two sides independently confirm each other that 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" is the reading of the base-text layers of both sides, and 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle" the reading of the majority layer of the sūtra explained. The full pattern of this variant name is set out side by side in Section VIII and recorded without judgement.

Second group: the opening question agrees almost entirely word for word. This treatise's〔T25 0389b06〕 「爾時,慧命舍利弗問富樓那:『云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘?』」 tr. "At that time the venerable Śāriputra asked Pūrṇa: ‘What is called a bodhisattva-mahāsattva's riding the Great Vehicle?’" and T223's〔T08 0247a20〕 「爾時慧命舍利弗問富樓那:『云何名菩薩摩』」 tr. "At that time the venerable Śāriputra asked Pūrṇa: ‘What is called a bodhisattva-mahā-’" (continuing below with 「訶薩乘於大乘」 tr. "-sattva's riding the Great Vehicle") follow each other word for word (differing only, at the editorial level, in the presence or absence of a comma); this is the whole-sentence anchor for the boundary between Sūtra and Treatise in this chapter.

Third group: variants in the fullness of the transcriptions dāna / dān and dhyāna / dhyān. Throughout, this treatise writes 「檀波羅蜜」 tr. "the perfection of giving (dān)" and 「禪波羅蜜」 tr. "the perfection of meditation (dhyān)", while T223 throughout writes 「檀那波羅蜜」 tr. "the perfection of giving (dāna)" and 「禪那波羅蜜」 tr. "the perfection of meditation (dhyāna)". This is a difference in the fullness of transcription between Kumārajīva's two translations (dāna = dāna, a full transcription; dān = an abbreviated transcription, which this treatise customarily uses; dhyāna = dhyāna, a full transcription). It runs through the whole text and is not listed place by place.

Fourth group: the abiding of dharmas / the position of dharmas (a doctrinally weighted variant, cross-confirmed across the whole T223 line). This treatise's〔T25 0389c01〕 「法相、法性、法住、實際但有名字」 tr. "the mark of dharmas, the nature of dharmas, the abiding of dharmas, and the limit of reality have only names" and T223's〔T08 0247b17〕 「法相、法性、法位、實際但有」 tr. "the mark of dharmas, the nature of dharmas, the position of dharmas, and the limit of reality have only"—this treatise reads 「法住」 tr. "the abiding of dharmas", T223 reads 「法位」 tr. "the position of dharmas." Checking the collations of both sides: T223 itself here reads 「法位」 tr. "the position of dharmas" consistently in all six editions (no collation note); this treatise's collation note here〔T25 0389c02〕 shows that its Shōgozō and Ishiyama texts read 「法位」 tr. "the position of dharmas", agreeing with the whole T223 line, while only its Taishō and Song read 「法住」 tr. "the abiding of dharmas", and its Yuan and Ming keep both readings side by side (see Section VIII). 「法位」 tr. "The position of dharmas" (dharma-niyāmatā, the determinacy of dharmas) and 「法住」 tr. "the abiding of dharmas" (dharma-sthititā, the abiding character of dharmas) are both members of the prajñā-lineage series of different names for the real mark of all dharmas, 「諸法如/法相/法性/法住〔法位〕/實際」 tr. "the suchness of dharmas / the mark of dharmas / the nature of dharmas / the abiding of dharmas 〔the position of dharmas〕 / the limit of reality"; they differ in meaning and are not simply a scribal error. The cross-textual cross-confirmation of this group is stronger than that of the mere variant chapter name; it is disclosed in full in Section VIII and recorded without judgement.

Fifth group: the wording variant world / land. This treatise's〔T25 0389c09〕 「淨佛世界,成就眾生」 tr. "purifying the buddha-world, bringing beings to maturity" and T223's〔T08 0247b25〕 「淨佛國土、成就眾生」 tr. "purifying the buddha-land, bringing beings to maturity"—this treatise reads 「世界」 tr. "world", T223 reads 「國土」 tr. "land." For this word〔T25 0389c09〕 the Ishiyama variant of this treatise also reads 「國土」 tr. "land" (see Section VIII), converging with T223's mainstream reading. World and land are synonymous (both render terms of the lokadhātu / kṣetra family). This is offered for the translator's reference and recorded without judgement.

Sixth group: the Treatise section is wholly an insertion unique to this treatise (an insertion at the end; zero correspondence in T223). After the closing sentence at the end of the Sūtra section〔T25 0389c17〕, this treatise inserts a whole Treatise section〔T25 0389c18–0390a23〕 (the sequence of the three matters, the three stages of "some say", the unmixed mind, provisional names, the supernormal powers with transformed bodies and offerings to the Buddhas, and the treatise-author's concluding passage—that is, the explanations of Sections II and V), whereas T223, after the same closing sentence〔T08 0247c05〕, goes straight to the end of its fascicle and turns at once to the next chapter, "Adornment", Chapter 17, with not a single word corresponding to the Treatise section. Thus the whole of T223's "Riding the Vehicle"〔T08 0247a19–0247c05〕 coincides exactly in its boundaries with this treatise's one Sūtra section〔T25 0389b06–0389c17〕, while this treatise's one Treatise section falls wholly outside T223's chapter boundaries, the point of insertion falling at the end of the whole chapter (of the same type as the earlier "Mahāsattva", whose Treatise is inserted at the end of the chapter). Further, T223's next chapter title, 「莊嚴品第十七」 tr. "Chapter on Adornment, the Seventeenth", is entirely different from this treatise's next chapter title, 「無縛無脫品第十七」 tr. "Chapter on Neither Bound nor Freed, the Seventeenth"—the chapter names of the two Chinese translations diverge from Chapter 17 on (this is outside the range of this chapter, and is recorded for reference in future study of Chapter 17).

Seventh group: divergence in the core image among the collateral translations (vehicle / donning armour: a question of method). Besides T223, read against this chapter word by word, three collateral translations were further checked. First, Dharmarakṣa's ancient translation, the Praise of Light Prajñāpāramitā, "Chapter on Riding the Great Vehicle, the Fourteenth"〔T08 0184c26〕: its opening, 「賢者舍利弗問分耨文陀尼弗:『云何菩薩摩訶薩乘于摩訶衍?』」 tr. "The worthy Śāriputra asked Fennou Wentuonifu: ‘How does a bodhisattva-mahāsattva ride the Mahāyāna?’"〔T08 0184c27〕 (Fennou Wentuonifu is the old transcription of Pūrṇa Maitrāyaṇīputra), corresponds in sense to the opening of this chapter's sūtra, and its chapter title reads directly 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle", making it a third-party, independent source for the reading 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle" (see Sections I and VIII). Second, Wuluocha's translation, the Emission of Light Prajñāpāramitā: this section searched it throughout with the four terms 「乘乘品」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle", 「乘大乘品」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Great Vehicle", 「云何名菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」 tr. "what is called a bodhisattva-mahāsattva's riding the Great Vehicle?", and 「色但有名字」 tr. "form has only a name", with zero hits in every case; the Emission of Light has no identifiable passage corresponding to this chapter's content. This is recorded honestly, and no textual study is forced. Third, the first part of Xuanzang's translation, the Great Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra: its corresponding passage renders Pūrṇa as 「滿慈子」 tr. "Son of Full Kindness", and its core image is 「擐大功德鎧」 tr. "donning the great armour of merit"—「由諸菩薩為欲利樂一切有情,擐大功德鎧故,發趣大乘、乘大乘故,復名摩訶薩」 tr. "because the bodhisattvas, wishing to benefit and gladden all sentient beings, don the great armour of merit, and because they set out toward the Great Vehicle and ride the Great Vehicle, they are further called mahāsattva"〔T05 0267c14〕. Thus Xuanzang, for the same passage of the Sanskrit text, chose 「擐甲」 tr. "donning armour" (saṃnāha, the image of putting on armour, of armoured vigour) as the leading metaphor, while the Kumārajīva line (T223 / T1509) takes 「乘」 tr. "vehicle" (driving, riding) as the leading metaphor; yet Xuanzang's sentence still keeps the phrase 「發趣大乘、乘大乘」 tr. "set out toward the Great Vehicle and ride the Great Vehicle", which shows that the original sense of the base text included the sense of 「乘」 tr. "riding." This is a clear example of the same passage of the Sanskrit text being given different core image-words by different translators; it is offered for the translator's reference and recorded without judgement, and no forced judgement is made as to which is closer to the original sense of the Sanskrit.

V. The Prajñā Eye

The eye of this chapter lies in 「乘於大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle": the bodhisattva contemplates that all dharmas are only names and ultimately cannot be found, and with the unmixed mind (free of the afflictions and of the intentions of the two vehicles), for the sake of sarvajñā, drives the Great Vehicle; his riding is a riding in which neither what is ridden nor the one who rides is attained. The whole chapter is a single alternation (one question from Śāriputra, one answer from Pūrṇa, one explanation by the treatise-author), and all of it is tied to prajñā's nothing to be attained and not being findable.

First, the riding in riding the vehicle lies in riding the six perfections while the three things are all unfindable. In the sūtra, Pūrṇa answers by first setting up the riding of the six perfections, saying that when the bodhisattva practises the perfection of prajñā he 「乘檀波羅蜜,亦不得檀波羅蜜,亦不得菩薩,亦不得受者,用無所得故」 tr. "rides the perfection of giving, yet does not attain the perfection of giving, does not attain the bodhisattva, does not attain the receiver, because he uses nothing to be attained"〔T25 0389b08〕; the five perfections from morality up to prajñā are likewise, and it closes with 「是為菩薩摩訶薩乘於大乘」 tr. "this is a bodhisattva-mahāsattva's riding the Great Vehicle"〔T25 0389b15〕. So what is called 「乘」 tr. "riding" the six perfections is riding without attaining the perfection that is ridden, without attaining the bodhisattva who rides, without attaining the receiver of the giving, all threaded together by 「用無所得故」 tr. "because he uses nothing to be attained." Riding without clinging—only this is called riding the Great Vehicle.

Second, only names, ultimately not to be found—even the Buddha cannot be found. In its "furthermore" sections the sūtra uses the sentence pattern 「但有名字,……不可得故」 tr. "there are only names ... because it cannot be found", going from form, feeling, perception, constructions, and consciousness, the eye up to the mind, the four foundations of mindfulness up to the limbs of the eightfold noble path, inner emptiness up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas, and the eighteen unshared dharmas, extending over the series of different names of the real mark of all dharmas in 「諸法如但有名字,如不可得故」 tr. "the suchness of dharmas has only a name, because suchness cannot be found"〔T25 0389c01〕, and ending at 「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字,佛不可得故」 tr. "anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi and the Buddha have only names, because the Buddha cannot be found"〔T25 0389c02〕. Thus not only do the aggregates, sense-fields, and elements, the limbs of the path, the nature of emptiness, the unshared dharmas, and the real mark of all dharmas all have only names and are ultimately empty; even the fruit of unsurpassed awakening and the Buddha's body itself alike return to being unfindable—this is the utmost reach of this chapter's contemplation of ultimate emptiness. The treatise takes up this meaning, saying 「知一切法假名字,於名字和合中復有名字;一切世間、若出世間,皆是假名」 tr. "knowing that all dharmas are provisional names, and that within the coming together of names there are further names; all that is worldly, and all that is beyond the world, are provisional names"〔T25 0390a03〕, and makes clear that all dharmas, worldly and world-transcending, are nothing but designations by provisional names.

Third, the unmixed mind, for the sake of sarvajñā, riding with the threefold sphere empty in substance. Riding the Great Vehicle is not merely contemplating emptiness; the mind has somewhere it returns to and something it leaves. The treatise makes this clear with the three stages: only with both emptinesses, of beings and of dharmas, and with the threefold sphere empty in substance (not seeing the three things—giver, receiver, and goods) is it called 「乘於大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle"〔T25 0389c24〕; it further makes this clear with the unmixed mind, saying that the bodhisattva, 「以不雜心,離諸煩惱及二乘意,為薩婆若故」 tr. "with the unmixed mind, free of all afflictions and of the intentions of the two vehicles, for the sake of sarvajñā"〔T25 0389c25〕, cultivates the four foundations of mindfulness up to the eighteen unshared dharmas while the mark of cultivating cannot be found and is ultimately pure. So the mind that rides the Great Vehicle leaves the obstruction of afflictions and leaves the aims of the two vehicles, and all its practice is undertaken for sarvajñā (omniscience). Thus from the nothing-to-be-attained of the six perfections and the only-names of all dharmas, on to the unmixed mind, being for sarvajñā, and the threefold sphere empty in substance, a single line runs straight through, and where it all comes to rest is the prajñā eye of driving the Great Vehicle without clinging to the one who rides or to what is ridden, contemplating all dharmas as ultimately unfindable while the mind is set on omniscience. At the end, the treatise-author's concluding sentence gathers it all up: 「大乘名畢竟清淨六波羅蜜」 tr. "the Great Vehicle is called the ultimately pure six perfections"〔T25 0390a19〕; the bodhisattva rides this ultimately pure Great Vehicle, never parted from the Buddhas, up to attaining the Buddha path.

VI. Divergent Readings of the Masters

As for the ancient masters who cite and explain this chapter, this section records the correspondence between what they comment on or cite and this chapter, and does not judge the interpretations of the various masters. The network of ancient masters for this chapter is as follows. Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra comments directly, line by line, and gives the richest support (including the listing in its table of contents, the naming simile 「乘馬乘舩」 tr. "riding a horse, riding a boat", the three-stage judgement introduced by 「如論云」 tr. "as the treatise says", the line-by-line commentary's 「乘法乘故名乘乘」 tr. "because one rides the dharma-vehicle it is called riding the vehicle" and 「舉法釋人」 tr. "raising the dharma to explain the person", an outline corresponding item by item to the structure of this chapter's sūtra text, and the retrospective framework of 「六問/乘乘人」 tr. "the six questions / the person who rides the vehicle" in later chapters). The surviving fragmentary fascicles of Huiying's Commentary lack a line-by-line commentary on this chapter (a large section from Chapter 13 on is missing), and this is recorded as absent. Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises has one doctrinal digest in which the chapter name is genuinely cited but the quoted text is not word for word from this chapter (a third type, distinct both from the same-name trap and from verbatim commentary). No citation is found in Zhiyi's works.

Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451) gives the richest support among the ancient masters for this chapter, in three layers. First, the table of contents at the head of the work and the chapter title in the line-by-line commentary. The table of contents lists directly 「乘乘品第十六」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, the Sixteenth"〔X24 0195a20〕, with no additional variant name (unlike the table-of-contents entry for the earlier "Delight in Speaking" chapter, which sets out three variant names side by side; here the entry has only a single chapter name, and this asymmetry is recorded as it is); the chapter-title line of the line-by-line commentary renders the same chapter title twice, as 「乘乘品第十六乘乘品第十六」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, the Sixteenth; Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, the Sixteenth"〔X24 0244b08〕.

Second, the forward-looking citation within the range of the earlier "Eloquence" chapter (the ancient master's interpretation of how 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" gets its name). In his outline-style general remarks on the preceding chapter, Jizang first discusses how, after 「發趣」 tr. "setting out", the two ends of rider and ridden necessarily arise over against each other, saying 「次從一切名為發趣,有發趣故必有能乘之人、所乘之法,如人乘馬、乘舩,故有乘乘品同」 tr. "next, from ‘all’ onward it is called setting out; because there is setting out, there must be the person who rides and the dharma that is ridden, as a person rides a horse or rides a boat; hence there is likewise the chapter on riding the vehicle"〔X24 0243b21〕—that is, after 「發趣」 tr. "setting out" there must be the two ends, 「能乘之人」 tr. "the person who rides" and 「所乘之法」 tr. "the dharma that is ridden", standing over against each other, just as in the relation of rider and ridden when a person rides a horse or a boat; therefore after 「發趣」 tr. "setting out" a separate 「乘乘品」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle" is set up to display this meaning. He further explicitly cites 「如論云」 tr. "as the treatise says" and judges three stages by the two emptinesses of beings and of dharmas, saying 「如論云:未得生、法二空行施為大莊嚴,得眾生空、未得法空為發趣,具得生、法二空而行施為乘乘也。常有三解,如別疏」 tr. "As the treatise says: giving without yet having attained the two emptinesses, of beings and of dharmas, is the great adornment; having attained the emptiness of beings but not yet the emptiness of dharmas is setting out; giving having fully attained the two emptinesses, of beings and of dharmas, is riding the vehicle. There are always three explanations, as in a separate commentary"〔X24 0243c04〕—judging the naming of the three chapters 「大莊嚴/發趣/乘乘」 tr. "the great adornment / setting out / riding the vehicle" as three stages according to the degree to which the emptiness of beings and the emptiness of dharmas have been realised: giving without having attained the two emptinesses of beings and dharmas = the great adornment; having attained the emptiness of beings but not the emptiness of dharmas = setting out; giving having fully attained the two emptinesses of beings and dharmas = riding the vehicle. These three stages agree in meaning, point for point, with the three stages of 「有人言」 tr. "some say" in this chapter's Treatise ① (Sections II and V), and the wording is very close (Jizang's 「未得生法二空」 tr. "not yet having attained the two emptinesses of beings and dharmas" ≈ the treatise's 「不能破吾我相」 tr. "cannot break the mark of I and self"; 「得眾生空未得法空」 tr. "having attained the emptiness of beings but not yet the emptiness of dharmas" ≈ the treatise's 「入眾生空,未入法空」 tr. "enters the emptiness of beings but has not yet entered the emptiness of dharmas"; 「具得生法二空」 tr. "fully attaining the two emptinesses of beings and dharmas" ≈ the treatise's 「因眾生空入法空中」 tr. "by way of the emptiness of beings, enters into the emptiness of dharmas"). What Jizang's 「如論云」 tr. "as the treatise says" refers to may be the 「有人言」 tr. "some say" passage of this chapter's Treatise ①, or may be a general statement of this meaning by the treatise-author; both are highly relevant to this chapter's content. The fact of their doctrinal agreement is recorded, and no forced judgement is made on the literal precision of the source of his citation.

Third, the explanation of the name and the outline in the line-by-line commentary on this chapter. Jizang explains the literal sense of the compound 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle", saying 「莊嚴宜論萬行莊嚴,法身菩薩正觀具萬行故為莊嚴。發趣是始終處所,今明乘乘則是具於人法,乘法乘故名乘乘也」 tr. "Adornment ought to be discussed as the adornment of the myriad practices: because the right contemplation of the dharma-body bodhisattva is complete with the myriad practices, it is adornment. Setting out is the place of beginning and end. Now it makes clear that ‘riding the vehicle’ is complete in both person and dharma: because one rides the dharma-vehicle it is called ‘riding the vehicle’"〔X24 0244b09〕—that is, 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" carries the two senses of 「人」 tr. "person" (the subject who rides) and 「法」 tr. "dharma" (the great dharma that is ridden), and because one drives the great dharma it is called 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle." He also distinguishes why this chapter is set up on its own, saying 「今明是舉法釋人,大人以乘大法故名大人也,故出一品」 tr. "Now it makes clear that this raises the dharma to explain the person: the great person is called a great person because he rides the great dharma; hence a chapter is set out"〔X24 0244b12〕—the earlier chapters all 「舉人釋大」 tr. "raise the person to explain ‘great’" (it is called great because it is what the great person rides), while this chapter 「舉法釋人」 tr. "raises the dharma to explain the person" (he is called a great person because he rides the great dharma): the perspective turns from the person to the dharma. Further, by question and answer he distinguishes this chapter from the preceding "The Great Adornment", saying 「問:人乘於乘運萬行,與萬行莊嚴何異?答:前取萬行莊嚴於人,今明取人秉御萬行;前以法成人,此取人御法也」 tr. "Question: a person riding the vehicle carries the myriad practices—how does this differ from the adornment of the myriad practices? Answer: before, the adornment of the myriad practices was taken with respect to the person; now it makes clear that the person is taken as wielding and driving the myriad practices. Before, the dharma completed the person; this takes the person as driving the dharma"〔X24 0244b13〕—the preceding chapter is 「法成人」 tr. "the dharma completes the person" (the myriad practices mould and accomplish this person), and this chapter is 「人御法」 tr. "the person drives the dharma" (this person holds and drives the myriad practices). He outlines this chapter's sūtra text, saying 「若階級釋則如論也。品前問,次答。答三:初明乘乘;次明為十方歎;三、總結。初中二:第一、明乘乘因;二、明乘乘得果」 tr. "If it is explained by stages, then it is as in the treatise. The chapter first asks, and next answers. The answer has three parts: first, it makes clear riding the vehicle; next, it makes clear the being praised by the ten directions; third, the conclusion. The first has two: first, it makes clear the cause of riding the vehicle; second, it makes clear the fruit attained by riding the vehicle"〔X24 0244b15〕. He outlines this chapter by 「品前問、答三(初明乘乘、次為十方歎、三總結)」 tr. "the chapter first asks; the answer has three parts (first making clear riding the vehicle, next being praised by the ten directions, third the conclusion)", and his 「答三」 tr. "the answer has three parts" corresponds item by item to the structure of this chapter's sūtra text (the chapter's first question corresponds to Śāriputra's question〔T25 0389b06〕; making clear riding the vehicle corresponds to the sections from the six perfections up to form having only a name; being praised by the ten directions corresponds to the Sūtra's 「十方如恒河沙等諸佛皆歡喜稱名讚歎」 tr. "the Buddhas of the ten directions, as many as the sands of the Ganges, all rejoice, call his name, and praise him"〔T25 0389c14〕; the conclusion corresponds to the closing sentence at the end of the Sūtra section〔T25 0389c17〕). There is no conflict in the correspondence, and it is independent, complete, and verifiable ancient-master outline material for this chapter.

In later chapters Jizang further marks, retrospectively, this chapter's place in his framework of questions and answers on the Great Vehicle with 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" and 「乘乘人」 tr. "the person who rides the vehicle" (recorded as entries only; all lie outside the range of this chapter). He gathers the chapters together as 「大乘六問」 tr. "the six questions on the Great Vehicle", saying 「依通云為六問:一、問乘體;二、問乘用;三、」 tr. "According to the general account there are six questions: first, asking about the substance of the vehicle; second, asking about the function of the vehicle; third, ..."〔X24 0246b02〕 (listing below asking about the beginning, asking about the end, asking about abiding in between, and asking about the person who rides the vehicle), and takes this chapter as the question on 「乘乘人」 tr. "the person who rides the vehicle"; in a later chapter he confirms this, saying 「次答第五問乘乘人。此中既標問,故乘品初有此問」 tr. "Next it answers the fifth question, on the person who rides the vehicle. Since the question is marked here, this question stands at the beginning of the vehicle chapter"〔X24 0251c04〕; and finally, with 「句義至乘乘,明菩薩摩訶薩義」 tr. "from ‘The Meaning of the Phrase’ to ‘Riding the Vehicle’, the meaning of bodhisattva-mahāsattva is made clear"〔X24 0257b11〕, he sums up that the chapters from "The Meaning of the Phrase" (Chapter 12) to "Riding the Vehicle" (this chapter) all make clear 「菩薩摩訶薩義」 tr. "the meaning of bodhisattva-mahāsattva." Although these three places are not within the main text of this chapter, they refer to this chapter directly as 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" and 「乘乘人」 tr. "the person who rides the vehicle", and form Jizang's independent confirmation of this chapter's position within the structure of his whole book; they are recorded as entries, and are not used as word-for-word citation material for the main text of this chapter.

The surviving fragmentary fascicles of Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791) lack a line-by-line commentary on this chapter. In the original fragmentary fascicles of Huiying's commentary, the line-by-line commentary jumps over a large section from Chapter 13 to Chapter 36 (including this chapter, "Riding the Vehicle"), so this chapter's line-by-line commentary falls within that large gap and does not exist in these fragments. This section searched Huiying's commentary throughout for 「乘乘品」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle" and 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle", with zero hits in each case (in addition, one hit was found for 「摩訶薩品」 tr. "Chapter on Mahāsattva"〔X46 0872c07〕, which on checking is a forward-looking mention in an earlier chapter pointing to Chapter 13, and has nothing to do with this chapter). Recorded honestly: this chapter has no line-by-line commentary in Huiying's surviving fragments; this is recorded as absent, and no claim is made that there is one.

Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784) has one genuine citation of the chapter name, but its quoted text is not word for word from this chapter. Junzheng explicitly marks 「大品經〔缺一字〕乘乘品云」 tr. "the Larger Sūtra 〔one character missing〕 Chapter on Riding the Vehicle says" (between the two words 「經」 tr. "sūtra" and 「乘乘品」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle", one character of the original manuscript in the CBETA base text is blurred and illegible) and brings out a passage of explanation, saying 「乘乘品云:乘相,大乘也。乘是何義?乘是運出」 tr. "The Chapter on Riding the Vehicle says: the mark of the vehicle is the Great Vehicle. What does vehicle mean? Vehicle means conveying out"〔X46 0642b07〕 (continuing below with 「義,如般若能生一切得」 tr. "... -ing: just as prajñā can produce all attainment"), explaining with 「乘是運出義」 tr. "vehicle means conveying out" that the vehicle can carry beings out to liberation; further, later in the text he says 「乘乘則通因果也。故大品經云自從三界出至薩」 tr. "Riding the vehicle, then, spans both cause and fruit. Therefore the Larger Sūtra says: from going out of the three realms up to sa-"〔X46 0643b16〕, continuing the doctrinal development of the concept 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle." However, this section checked word for word the entire text of T223's "Riding the Vehicle"〔T08 0247a19–0247c05〕 and the entire text of this chapter of this treatise〔T25 0389b02–0390a24〕, and in neither is there any word-for-word correspondence for the two terms 「乘相」 tr. "the mark of the vehicle" and 「運出」 tr. "conveying out": Junzheng's quoted passage is his own doctrinal digest and interpretive paraphrase, not a word-for-word citation of this chapter. This differs in nature from Junzheng's 「同名陷阱」 tr. "same-name trap" distinguished in the preceding chapter (a chance coincidence of wording in an entirely unrelated context): here Junzheng explicitly marks the chapter name 「乘乘品」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle" and attaches his explanation to this chapter, which is a genuine reference by chapter name; yet it also differs from Jizang's word-for-word commentary, and should not be put on a par with word-for-word citation. This section honestly records this intermediate type in layers—the citation of the chapter name is genuine, while the content of the quotation is Junzheng's doctrinal digest; this is offered for the translator's reference, and no forced judgement is made on the edition Junzheng relied on or on the precision of his paraphrase.

For Zhiyi's works, this section, following the checking method already established in the preceding chapter, searched throughout for 「乘乘品」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle" and 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle", with zero hits in each case. Recorded as it is: no citation of this chapter in any form by Zhiyi is found; nothing is forcibly adopted and nothing is fabricated.

VII. Cross-reading and Further Resonances

The bones of this chapter are three, and all of them are taken up by the prajñā lineage and by the later commentaries.

First, the continuity of Pūrṇa's three phrases, three chapters as one thread. This chapter, "Riding the Vehicle", is the third of the three phrases with which Pūrṇa set up his thesis (the great adornment, setting out toward the Great Vehicle, riding the Great Vehicle), namely 「乘於大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle", and follows on from the first two phrases (the great adornment, setting out) of the preceding "The Great Adornment"; Treatise ①, at its opening, marks this itself: 「富樓那以三事明摩訶薩,上已說二事,今問第三事『乘於大乘』」 tr. "Pūrṇa makes clear the mahāsattva by three matters; two matters have already been explained above, and now the third matter, ‘riding the Great Vehicle’, is asked about"〔T25 0389c18〕. Among the ancient masters, Jizang and Junzheng each judge these three phrases as three stages by whether the emptiness of beings and the emptiness of dharmas have been attained: Jizang says 「如論云:未得生、法二空行施為大莊嚴,得眾生空、未得法空為發趣,具得生、法二空而行施為乘乘也」 tr. "As the treatise says: giving without yet having attained the two emptinesses, of beings and of dharmas, is the great adornment; having attained the emptiness of beings but not yet the emptiness of dharmas is setting out; giving having fully attained the two emptinesses, of beings and of dharmas, is riding the vehicle"〔X24 0243c04〕, and Junzheng too, with 「乘乘則通因果也」 tr. "riding the vehicle, then, spans both cause and fruit"〔X46 0643b16〕, takes up these three concepts and develops them. Thus the doctrinal framework of this chapter's three-phrase thesis is taken up and judged by the ancient masters within an independent (or common-source) three-stage framework. This section records the continuity and does not fix a reading on anyone's behalf; the sources involved are all given word for word in Sections IV and VI.

Second, the continuity of the compound 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" (person and dharma; rider and ridden). The treatise-author of this chapter makes clear 「乘於大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle" by three matters and three stages, and the ancient master Jizang takes this up to explain the literal sense of the compound 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle." With 「今明乘乘則是具於人法,乘法乘故名乘乘也」 tr. "now it makes clear that ‘riding the vehicle’ is complete in both person and dharma: because one rides the dharma-vehicle it is called ‘riding the vehicle’"〔X24 0244b10〕 Jizang explains that it carries the two senses of 「人」 tr. "person" (the rider) and 「法」 tr. "dharma" (the ridden); with 「如人乘馬、乘舩」 tr. "as a person rides a horse or rides a boat"〔X24 0243b22〕 he opens the simile of 「能乘之人、所乘之法」 tr. "the person who rides, the dharma that is ridden"; and with 「此取人御法也」 tr. "this takes the person as driving the dharma"〔X24 0244b15〕 he distinguishes this chapter's 「人御法」 tr. "the person drives the dharma" from the preceding chapter's 「法成人」 tr. "the dharma completes the person." In a different translation, Xuanzang, for the same passage of the Sanskrit text, changes the image of 「乘」 tr. "riding" (driving) to the image of putting on armour, 「擐大功德鎧」 tr. "donning the great armour of merit"〔T05 0267c15〕; so the same passage of the Sanskrit text was given a different core image by a different translator. This section records the continuity and does not fix a reading on anyone's behalf; the sources involved are all given word for word in Sections IV and VI.

Third, the continuity of the contemplation of ultimate emptiness, 「但有名字、畢竟不可得」 tr. "only names, ultimately not to be found." In its "furthermore" sections this chapter's sūtra enumerates eleven layers of dharma-categories with the sentence pattern 「但有名字,……不可得故」 tr. "there are only names ... because it cannot be found", extending over the different names of the real mark of all dharmas and ending at 「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提及佛但有名字,佛不可得故」 tr. "anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi and the Buddha have only names, because the Buddha cannot be found"〔T25 0389c02〕, and the treatise takes it up, saying 「知一切法假名字,於名字和合中復有名字;一切世間、若出世間,皆是假名」 tr. "knowing that all dharmas are provisional names, and that within the coming together of names there are further names; all that is worldly, and all that is beyond the world, are provisional names"〔T25 0390a03〕. This contemplation of ultimate emptiness, 「一切法但有名字、畢竟不可得」 tr. "all dharmas have only names and ultimately cannot be found", is a meaning that runs through the whole prajñā lineage, and this chapter takes 「連菩提果與佛身亦不可得」 tr. "even the fruit of awakening and the Buddha's body cannot be found" as its utmost reach. This section records the continuity and does not fix a reading on anyone's behalf; the sources involved are all given word for word in Sections II, IV, and V.

As for the order of this treatise, this chapter has an explicit internal cross-reference, attached by the treatise-author himself. Treatise ①, at its opening, attaches itself to the two matters of the preceding chapter as what it continues, saying 「富樓那以三事明摩訶薩,上已說二事,今問第三事『乘於大乘』」 tr. "Pūrṇa makes clear the mahāsattva by three matters; two matters have already been explained above, and now the third matter, ‘riding the Great Vehicle’, is asked about"〔T25 0389c18〕—the treatise-author himself marks the 「乘於大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle" that this chapter explains as the third of Pūrṇa's three matters, following on from the two matters already explained in the preceding chapter, the great adornment and setting out. This self-attachment of the line of meaning is recorded here as continuity, without fixing a reading on anyone's behalf.

VIII. Witnesses and Editions

Of this chapter's collation, the items that may bear on the meaning of the sūtra are selected below; the readings of the different editions are preserved side by side, and the main text continues to follow the reading of the current base text. This fascicle (Fascicle 46) has two special features that must first be noted—the Palace edition is absent for the whole fascicle, and the Ishiyama text's chapter and fascicle numbers are doubly displaced; both are detailed in the paragraph near the end of this section.

0389b02 (chapter title; the complete collation clusters of both sides' editions set side by side): (大智度論釋乘乘品第十六〔卷第四十六〕)十六字【大】|大智度論卷第四十六第十六品釋乘乘品【宋】【元】|大智度論卷第四十六釋乘乘品第十六經作乘大乘品【明】|大智度經論卷第四十六釋第十五品訖第十七品上【聖】|摩訶般若波羅蜜品第十五乘乘品十五卷四十八【石】|此卷宮本缺—among the six editions of this treatise's line, the Taishō, Song, and Yuan read the core 「乘乘品」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle" (differing only in word order and in whether the numeral 「第十六」 tr. "the Sixteenth" is present); the Ming edition's title likewise reads 「乘乘品第十六」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, the Sixteenth", but carries its own editorial note 「經作乘大乘品」 tr. "the sūtra has ‘Chapter on Riding the Great Vehicle’" (that is, the Ming editor states that the sūtra he read against it has 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle"); the Shōgozō at this point makes no comparison of chapter names but instead describes the range covered by the fascicle (explaining from Chapter 15 through the first part of Chapter 17); the Ishiyama text reads 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" but records the chapter number as 「十五」 tr. "fifteen" and the fascicle number as 「四十八」 tr. "forty-eight" (a double displacement; see the end of this section); and the Palace edition lacks this fascicle entirely. This stands in contrast to the chapter title of the sūtra explained, T223: T223's Taishō base text reads 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle", and its collation note reads 乘乘【大】|乘大乘【宋】【元】【明】【宮】 (there is also T223's original collation footnote, 「乘乘=乘大乘〔三〕〔宮〕」 tr. "riding the vehicle = riding the Great Vehicle 〔three〕〔Palace〕", where the bracketed ‘three’ is the collective name for the Song, Yuan, and Ming); that is, of T223's six editions only the Taishō and Shōgozō read 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle", while the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace read 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle." Thus the base-text layers of both sides (this treatise's Taishō, Song, Yuan, and Ishiyama; the sūtra's Taishō and Shōgozō) all lean to 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle", while the majority layer of the sūtra explained (the four editions Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace) and the editorial note of this treatise's Ming edition together point to 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle"; in addition, Dharmarakṣa's ancient translation, the Praise of Light Prajñāpāramitā, directly titles it 「乘大乘品第十四」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Great Vehicle, the Fourteenth"〔T08 0184c26〕, as third-party corroboration (see Sections I and IV). The main text follows the base text's 「乘乘品」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle."

0389b05 (the translator's title): 後秦龜茲國三藏【大】|姚秦三藏法師【宋】【元】【明】—「後秦」 tr. "Later Qin" and 「姚秦」 tr. "Yao Qin" are different names for the same regime, and 「龜茲國三藏」 tr. "Tripiṭaka master of the Kingdom of Kucha" and 「三藏法師」 tr. "Tripiṭaka Dharma master" are different expressions of the title; this is no substantive divergence of content but purely a difference of conventional wording at the editorial level, recorded without judgement. The main text follows the base text's 「後秦龜茲國三藏」 tr. "Tripiṭaka master of the Kingdom of Kucha, Later Qin."

0389b06 (the label at the start of the Sūtra section): 【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【聖】—the Song edition and the Shōgozō do not explicitly mark the word 「【經】」 tr. "Sūtra" at the start of the Sūtra section (or simply divide sections by the sense), which does not affect the content; this is offered for the translator's reference. It echoes, in the same pattern, the label at the start of the Treatise section, 0389c18 【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【聖】 (the Song edition and the Shōgozō also do not explicitly mark 「【論】」 tr. "Treatise" at the start of the Treatise section); the two editions may have some other convention of section division; recorded without judgement.

0389b18 (omission of a word): 法【大】|〔-〕【石】—in the sentence 「修十八不共法,法壞故」 tr. "cultivating the eighteen unshared dharmas, because the dharmas are destroyed", the Ishiyama text lacks one 「法」 tr. "dharma", in keeping with the Ishiyama text's consistent pattern of abridgement (see the item on the Ishiyama displacement at the end of this section); purely a technical omission, recorded without judgement. The main text follows the base text's 「法」 tr. "dharma."

0389c02 (the abiding of dharmas / the position of dharmas; doctrinally weighted; confirmed across the whole T223 line): 法住【大】|法位【聖】【石】|法住法位【元】【明】 (the Song edition gives no separate variant here and follows the base text's reading 「法住」 tr. "the abiding of dharmas"; that is, 「法住」 tr. "the abiding of dharmas" is the reading of the Taishō and Song)—in the sentence 「法相、法性、法住、實際但有名字」 tr. "the mark of dharmas, the nature of dharmas, the abiding of dharmas, and the limit of reality have only names", its 「法住」 tr. "abiding of dharmas" (Section IV, fourth group). Among this treatise's six editions, the Taishō and Song read 「法住」 tr. "the abiding of dharmas", the Shōgozō and Ishiyama read 「法位」 tr. "the position of dharmas", and the Yuan and Ming keep both readings together (the abiding of dharmas, the position of dharmas); the 「法位」 tr. "position of dharmas" of the Shōgozō and Ishiyama agrees word for word with the 「法位」 tr. "position of dharmas"〔T08 0247b17〕 of the whole line of the sūtra explained, T223 (all six editions consistent). 「法位」 tr. "The position of dharmas" (dharma-niyāmatā, the determinacy of dharmas) and 「法住」 tr. "the abiding of dharmas" (dharma-sthititā, the abiding character of dharmas) are both members of the prajñā-lineage series of different names for the real mark of all dharmas (the suchness of dharmas / the mark of dharmas / the nature of dharmas / the abiding of dharmas 〔the position of dharmas〕 / the limit of reality); they differ in meaning and are not simply a scribal error. This is the only doctrinally weighted variant in this chapter that has the double evidence of 「跨 T223 全系印證」 tr. "confirmation across the whole T223 line" and 「本論系內分歧」 tr. "divergence within this treatise's own line"; it is offered for the translator's reference and recorded without judgement. The main text follows the base text's 「法住」 tr. "the abiding of dharmas."

0389c09 (world / land): 世界【大】*|國土【石】* (「*」 tr. "the asterisk" is a CBETA mark indicating the correspondence of variants of this type)—the sentence 「淨佛世界,成就眾生」 tr. "purifying the buddha-world, bringing beings to maturity" (Section IV, fifth group). The base text reads 「世界」 tr. "world", and the Ishiyama text reads 「國土」 tr. "land", agreeing with the mainstream reading 「國土」 tr. "land"〔T08 0247b25〕 of the sūtra explained, T223; world and land are synonymous (both render terms of the lokadhātu / kṣetra family) and stand side by side, recorded without judgement. The main text follows the base text's 「世界」 tr. "world."

0390a20 (technical variant): 大乘【大】|於大乘【石】|乘【聖】—in the sentence 「菩薩摩訶薩乘大乘時」 tr. "when the bodhisattva-mahāsattva rides the Great Vehicle", for 「大乘」 tr. "Great Vehicle" the Ishiyama text reads 「於大乘」 tr. "on the Great Vehicle" and the Shōgozō reads 「乘」 tr. "vehicle"; this is a technical variant at the level of adding or dropping particles, with no bearing on doctrine, recorded without judgement. The main text follows the base text's 「大乘」 tr. "Great Vehicle."

The two special features of this fascicle are noted together as follows. First, the Palace edition is absent for the whole fascicle: not a single note in the entire collation of this chapter (the items from the chapter title 0389b02 to the chapter end 0390a23) lists the Palace edition as a witness, which agrees word for word with the note attached to the chapter title, 「此卷宮本缺」 tr. "this fascicle is missing in the Palace edition"〔0389b02〕. That is, the transmitted Palace manuscript of the whole of Fascicle 46 (including the entire text of this chapter and the first part of Chapter 17) is lacking; this is not an individual variant but the loss of a whole fascicle (it is of a different type from the preceding "The Great Adornment", where the Palace edition reads 「辯才品」 tr. "Chapter on Eloquence"—there, in Fascicle 45, the Palace edition still survives and reads a variant name, while here the Palace edition is wholly missing; the two are not to be confused). Second, the Ishiyama text's double displacement, chapter number minus one and fascicle number plus two: in this chapter's title the Ishiyama text reports itself as 「乘乘品十五卷四十八」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, fifteen; fascicle forty-eight"〔0389b02〕, that is, it records the chapter number as 「十五」 tr. "fifteen" (one less than the Taishō's 「第十六」 tr. "the Sixteenth") and the fascicle number as 「四十八」 tr. "forty-eight" (two more than the Taishō's 「卷四十六」 tr. "Fascicle forty-six"). Further, it closes on its own at the end of the chapter, with the collation note 大乘【大】|大乘釋十五品竟【石】〔0390a23〕; that is, at the end of the sentence 「常乘此大乘」 tr. "constantly rides this Great Vehicle" the Ishiyama text appends 「釋十五品竟」 tr. "end of the explanation of the fifteenth chapter", which, together with its title's self-report 「乘乘品十五」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Vehicle, fifteen", confirms that the Ishiyama text numbers it 「品十五」 tr. "chapter fifteen." Further, the closing note 「釋第某品竟」 tr. "end of the explanation of chapter such-and-such" that this treatise customarily appends at the end of a chapter is absent in the Taishō within the range of this chapter (the Taishō defers this closing record, marking it within the range of Chapter 17〔0393a29〕 as 「解釋第十六品竟」 tr. "end of the explanation of the sixteenth chapter", while the Ishiyama text closes there on its own with 「品十六」 tr. "chapter sixteen", corresponding to the Taishō's Chapter 17); that is, the Ishiyama numbering system is systematically displaced by minus one relative to the Taishō (the Ishiyama chapter number is always one less than the Taishō's). This double displacement of the Ishiyama text shares its origin with the Ishiyama numbering displacement in the preceding "The Great Adornment" (titled there 「大誓莊嚴品十四」 tr. "Chapter on the Great Adornment of Vows, fourteen", displaced by minus one); this fascicle has the further feature of a fascicle number plus two. Its cause is not forcibly investigated, and it is recorded without judgement.

0389c25 (core term; repetition of an adjacent character): 雜【大】|離【宋】—in the sentence 「是菩薩以不〔雜〕心,離諸煩惱及二乘意」 tr. "this bodhisattva, with the un〔mixed〕 mind, free of all afflictions and of the intentions of the two vehicles", the character 「雜」 tr. "mixed" is what the term 「不雜心」 tr. "the unmixed mind" of Section II hangs on. The base text reads 「不雜心」 tr. "the unmixed mind", and the Song edition reads 「不離心」 tr. "the mind not free"—the 「離」 tr. "free" is probably repeated under the influence of the phrase below, 「離諸煩惱」 tr. "free of all afflictions", with its 「離」 tr. "free" (repetition of an adjacent character), and is not a separate reading; the doctrinal judgement on 「不雜心」 tr. "the unmixed mind" (the mind not mixed with afflictions and with the intentions of the two vehicles, Section II) is not changed by it; recorded without judgement. The main text follows the base text's 「雜」 tr. "mixed."

Every note in this chapter's collation was checked item by item. Apart from the chapter-title notes and the doctrinally weighted and label items listed above, all the remaining items are technical variants: additions or omissions of particles (such as 0389b09 得, 0389b15 是/是名, 0389b22 若, 0389c04 如是, 0389c18 已, 0390a01 故, 0390a01 相), homophonous loan characters (such as 0390a08 經/逕), or repetition of adjacent characters (such as 0389c25 離/故離). Checked item by item, none shows a change at the doctrinal level, so they are not set out item by item but only passed over statistically.

The base text of this chapter is Fascicle 46 of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa〔T25 0389b02–0390a24〕. This chapter is the opening chapter of Fascicle 46, so after the chapter title it carries the colophon of authorship and translation; Fascicle 46 does not close at the end of this chapter (it continues into Chapter 17, "Neither Bound nor Freed"), so this chapter has no fascicle-end title, and the end point of its range is taken at the opening title of the next chapter, Chapter 17, "Neither Bound nor Freed"〔T25 0390a24〕, exclusive. The collation text for the sūtra explained is Chapter 16, "Riding the Vehicle", of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra〔T08 0247a19–0247c05〕 (its chapter title reads 「乘乘」 tr. "riding the vehicle" in the Taishō and Shōgozō and 「乘大乘」 tr. "riding the Great Vehicle" in the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace editions; see Section I). The collateral translations are Dharmarakṣa's Praise of Light Prajñāpāramitā (T08n0222; 「乘大乘品第十四」 tr. "Chapter on Riding the Great Vehicle, the Fourteenth"), Wuluocha's Emission of Light Prajñāpāramitā (T08n0221; zero hits for this chapter's content), and the first part of Xuanzang's Great Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra (T05n0220a; the core image is 「擐大功德鎧」 tr. "donning the great armour of merit", Section IV, seventh group). The collation text for ancient-master commentary is Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451; the richest support for this chapter); there are also Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791; the line-by-line commentary on this chapter is missing) and Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784; one genuine citation of the chapter name, whose quotation is a doctrinal digest and not word for word). Variant notes follow the Taishō collation, covering differences between the Taishō base text and the Song, Yuan, Ming, Palace, Shōgozō, and Ishiyama editions (in this fascicle the Palace edition is wholly missing). The full collation notes of this chapter are preserved at the end of the working base-text file; this list transmits only the main items bearing on the wording of this chapter's core doctrine, and does not extend to judging the relative merit of the editions.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing. The full statement of AI's role across the 指月 project is maintained at methodology.

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0