大智度論 兩不和合品Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · The Two Discords

心要Essence

這一品的魔,不現猙獰之形。它藏在兩個好人中間。「聽法人欲書、持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、問義、正憶念;說法人懈墮,不欲為說。當知是為菩薩摩訶薩魔事」——反過來,說的人心不懈墮,聽的人不欲受之,「二心不和,當知是為魔事」。一個要學、一個不教是魔事;一個要教、一個不學也是魔事。過不在哪一邊,過在兩邊合不起來。論主把道理交了底:「一切有為法,因緣和合故生,眾緣離則無。譬如攢燧求火,有鑽、有母,二事因緣得火」——書寫般若也是因緣生法,「師、弟子同心同事故,乃得書成」。缺一邊,火就點不著。

之上的重頭戲是十二頭陀:阿蘭若、常乞食、納衣、一坐食、節量食、中後不飲漿、塚間住、樹下住、露地住、常坐不臥、次第乞食、但三衣。一人受、一人不受,兩不和合,也是魔事。可是論主先劃清一條線:「十二頭陀不名為戒,能行,則戒莊嚴;不能行,不犯戒」——頭陀是行善,不是制戒,不行無罪。無罪之處也能出魔事,這是本品最細的一刀:兩種善法相值而不相下,其失與惡等。接著逐支釋因緣,句句見僧團生活的實感——一食是因為「佛法為行道故,不為益身,如養馬、養猪」;節量食引舍利弗自說「我若食五口、六口,足之以水,則足支身」;不飲漿如馬著了轡勒,「不肯進路」的心才斷;樹下住是隨佛的足跡,「如佛生時、成道時、轉法輪時、般涅槃時,皆在樹下」;露地住則「月光遍照,空中明淨,心易入空三昧」。而總綱只一句:「佛法唯以智慧為本,不以苦為先。」

之下把對偶清單一路鋪開:有信無信、能施悋惜、欲供養不欲受、易悟闇鈍、知不知十二部經次第義、成不成就六波羅蜜、有無方便力、得不得陀羅尼、離不離五蓋,乃至他方危命、飢餓穀貴、豐樂曠野、檀越因緣——每一對都正反兩說,說者聽者輪流在錯的一邊。論主追出病根:「一切眾生所行法,同則和合;一人離五蓋,一人不離,故相輕,相輕故不和合。」相輕二字,收盡二十餘對。師見弟子不行六度便不肯教,不知此人聞般若後當成大事;弟子見師破散六度便疑師不深樂,不知那是斷人著的方便。陀羅尼也有種種:弟子得聞持而不能解義,師能解義而不得聞持——各拿了一半,卻拿自己那一半輕對方。

再往後,魔親自出場,且一次比一次體面:作比丘形像來,說「如我所說經即是般若波羅蜜,此經非般若波羅蜜」,未受記的菩薩便墮疑;作佛身金色丈光,菩薩貪著,「貪著故,耗減薩婆若」;作佛身及比丘僧、化作無數百千萬億菩薩行六波羅蜜,見者心著,同樣耗減。論主的喻毫不留情:「如未離欲人見天女形,深心染著,不能堪受天欲,迷悶而死」;又如人手捉重寶,「有人以少金誑之,捨大價寶而取賤物,是名耗減」。連好法也能作魔:「以著心行六波羅蜜,是名似」;聲聞辟支佛經「雖是好事,破菩薩道,故名魔事」——這一品把判準說到了底:「一切煩惱、取相,皆是魔事。」魔不以惡壞人,以似壞人、以好壞人。

那麼般若何以偏多留難?佛自設一喻:「譬如閻浮提中珍寶:金、銀、琉璃、車𤦲、馬瑙、珊瑚等寶,多難多賊」——賊為珍寶出,不為瓦石生;留難之多,正證般若之貴。魔是欲界主、「世間生死根本」,般若多令眾生入涅槃,故魔作怨賊。但護持也自上而下:能書持正憶念而魔事不起的,「當知佛力故」,十方諸佛與阿鞞跋致菩薩皆擁護祐助——「如賊繞城,大人守護,小兒不覺」。初心人在護中而不自知。品末一句收束全品,也開出藥方:「佛意但欲令行者成般若大事,是故師徒宜應和合,一切惡事,不應計念。」覺魔是防,和合是成;兩不和合品講了幾十種散的方式,只為守住一種合的方式——師徒同心同事,火才點得著,經才寫得成。

The Māra of this chapter does not show a fearsome face. He hides between two good people. ‘The hearer wishes to write out and uphold prajñāpāramitā, to read, recite, ask its meaning, and rightly recollect it; the speaker of the Dharma is slack and does not wish to speak it. Know that this is a deed of Māra for the bodhisattva-mahāsattva’—and the other way round, the speaker's mind is not slack but the hearer does not wish to receive it: ‘the two minds are not in accord; know that this is a deed of Māra.’ One wants to learn and the other will not teach: a deed of Māra. One wants to teach and the other will not learn: also a deed of Māra. The fault lies on neither side; the fault is that the two sides do not come together. The treatise-author lays the principle bare: ‘Every conditioned dharma arises because causes and conditions come together; when the conditions part, it is not. It is like seeking fire with a fire-drill: there is the drill and there is the base, and by the two together the fire is got.’ Writing out prajñā too is a dharma born of conditions: ‘only because teacher and disciple are of one mind and one undertaking can the writing out be completed.’ Take one side away and the fire will not catch.

The weighty matter of the First Part is the twelve dhūta practices: dwelling in the araṇya, always begging for food, wearing robes of cast-off rags, eating at one sitting, eating in measured quantity, not drinking juices after midday, dwelling among the tombs, dwelling under a tree, dwelling in the open, always sitting and never lying down, begging from house to house in order, and keeping only the three robes. One person takes them up and the other does not; the two are not in accord, and this too is a deed of Māra. But the treatise-author first draws a clear line: ‘the twelve dhūta practices are not called precepts; if one can practise them, the precepts are adorned; if one cannot practise them, one does not break the precepts.’ The dhūta practices are the doing of good, not the laying down of precepts; not doing them is no offence. That a deed of Māra can arise even where there is no offence is the finest cut of this chapter: two wholesome dharmas meet and neither yields, and the loss is equal to that of evil. Then the reasons are explained practice by practice, every sentence carrying the felt reality of the life of the Saṅgha: one meal a day is because ‘the Buddha's Dharma is for the sake of practising the path, not for the benefit of the body, as one feeds a horse or feeds a pig’; for eating in measured quantity Śāriputra's own words are cited, ‘if I eat five or six mouthfuls and fill up with water, that is enough to support the body’; not drinking juices is like a horse fitted with the bridle, and only then is the mind that ‘will not go forward on the road’ cut off; dwelling under a tree follows in the Buddha's footsteps, ‘as when the Buddha was born, when he attained the path, when he turned the wheel of the Dharma, and when he entered parinirvāṇa, all under a tree’; dwelling in the open, ‘the moonlight shines everywhere, the sky is bright and clear, and the mind easily enters the emptiness samādhi.’ And the whole is governed by a single sentence: ‘The Buddha's Dharma takes wisdom alone as its root; it does not put suffering first.’

The Last Part spreads out the list of pairs one after another: having faith and having no faith; able to give and begrudging; wishing to make offerings and not wishing to receive them; quick to understand and dull and dark; knowing and not knowing the order and meaning of the twelve divisions of the scriptures; having and not having accomplished the six perfections; having and not having the power of skilful means; obtaining and not obtaining dhāraṇī; parted and not parted from the five hindrances; and on to danger to life in another region, famine and dear grain, a prosperous and pleasant land or a wilderness, the circumstances of a donor—every pair is stated both ways, and speaker and hearer take turns on the wrong side. The treatise-author tracks down the root of the sickness: ‘Among all the dharmas that beings practise, where they are the same there is accord; one person has left the five hindrances and one has not, and so they belittle each other, and because they belittle each other they are not in accord.’ The two Chinese characters rendered here as ‘belittle each other’ gather up more than twenty pairs. A teacher sees that a disciple does not practise the six perfections and so will not teach him, not knowing that this person, having heard prajñā, will accomplish the great matter; a disciple sees the teacher break up and scatter the six perfections and suspects that the teacher does not deeply delight in them, not knowing that this is the skilful means that cuts off a person's attachment. Dhāraṇī too are of many kinds: the disciple has obtained the dhāraṇī of hearing and retaining but cannot explain the meaning; the teacher can explain the meaning but has not obtained the dhāraṇī of hearing and retaining—each holds one half, yet each uses his own half to belittle the other.

Further on, Māra comes forward in person, and each time more presentable than the last: he comes in the form of a bhikṣu and says, ‘the sūtra I speak is prajñāpāramitā; this sūtra is not prajñāpāramitā,’ and the bodhisattva who has not received the prediction falls into doubt; he comes in the body of a Buddha, golden-coloured with a fathom of light, and the bodhisattva craves and clings to it, ‘and because of craving and clinging, sarvajñā is diminished’; he makes the body of a Buddha with a Saṅgha of bhikṣus, and conjures countless hundreds of thousands of myriads of koṭi of bodhisattvas practising the six perfections, and the one who sees them clings in mind, and sarvajñā is diminished in the same way. The treatise-author's simile is merciless: ‘like a person not yet free of desire who sees the form of a heavenly maiden and is deeply stained with attachment, cannot bear to receive the pleasures of heaven, and dies in a swoon’; again, like a person holding a heavy treasure in his hand, ‘whom someone deceives with a little gold, so that he lets go the treasure of great price and takes the cheap thing—this is called diminishment.’ Even good dharmas can act as Māra: ‘to practise the six perfections with a clinging mind is called the semblance’; the sūtras of the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas, ‘though they are good things, break the bodhisattva path, and so are called deeds of Māra’—and here the chapter states its criterion to the very bottom: ‘every affliction and every grasping at marks is a deed of Māra.’ Māra does not ruin a person with evil; he ruins him with the semblance, he ruins him with the good.

Why then does prajñā in particular have so many hindrances? The Buddha himself sets a simile: ‘It is like the precious things of Jambudvīpa—gold, silver, beryl, giant clam, agate, coral and such treasures—which have many difficulties and many thieves.’ Thieves come out for treasure, not for tiles and stones; that the hindrances are many is exactly the proof that prajñā is precious. Māra is the lord of the desire realm, ‘the root of birth and death in the world’; prajñā leads many beings into nirvāṇa, and so Māra makes himself an enemy and a thief. But the protection too comes from above: for the one who can write out, uphold, and rightly recollect, and in whom the deeds of Māra do not arise, ‘know that it is by the Buddha's power’; the buddhas of the ten directions and the avaivartika bodhisattvas all guard, protect, and assist him—‘as when thieves surround a city, the grown men keep guard and the small children do not notice.’ The beginner is inside the protection and does not know it. The chapter's last sentence gathers up the whole and also writes out the remedy: ‘The Buddha's intent is only that the practitioner accomplish the great matter of prajñā; therefore teacher and disciple should be in accord, and should not take any evil thing to heart.’ To be aware of Māra is the guarding; to be in accord is the accomplishing. The chapter of the two discords speaks of dozens of ways of coming apart, only in order to hold on to one way of coming together—when teacher and disciple are of one mind and one undertaking, the fire catches, and the sūtra gets written.

義疏 · 總說Exposition · Overview

總說

〈兩不和合品〉承前品魔事而來,卻把眼光從一人心上移到兩人之間。前品所說留難,多起於行者自心——念起、著利、貪樂說;本品開卷第一句,便換了一個結構:「復次,須菩提!聽法人欲書、持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、問義、正憶念;說法人懈墮,不欲為說。當知是為菩薩摩訶薩魔事。」一人欲學,一人不欲教——單看任何一頭,都未必是惡人;合起來看,般若便書不成、持不成。經文隨即反轉:「說法之人心不懈墮,欲令書、持般若波羅蜜;聽法者不欲受之。二心不和,當知是為魔事。」品名之眼即在此立:魔事不必自外來,說法者與聽法者「二心不和」,這一隙便是魔之門。論釋開宗明義把道理說盡:「一切有為法,因緣和合故生,眾緣離則無。譬如攢燧求火,有鑽、有母,二事因緣得火」——書寫般若乃至正憶念亦如是,「所謂師、弟子同心同事故,乃得書成」。全品三番經、三番論,跨卷六十八、六十九兩卷,就從這一對一對的「兩不和合」鋪展開去:之上一經一論,立對偶之式而詳釋十二頭陀;之下二經二論,廣列師弟諸不和之相,轉入惡魔化現四型,終於珍寶多賊之喻與佛力擁護收場。

之上一番,立式明陀。經①列四重對偶:一人欲書持而一人懈墮、一人欲教而一人欲至他方、一人「貴重布施衣服、飲食、臥具、醫藥、資生之物」而一人「少欲知足,行遠離行,攝念精進,一心智慧」、一人受十二頭陀而一人不受——每一重皆正反兩向各說一遍,說者聽者互換其位,結句同是「兩不和合,不得書般若波羅蜜」。論①先以攢燧之喻立宗,次逐難而釋:五蓋覆心者何以作師?「是人著世間樂,不觀空、無常,雖能心知、口說,不能自行」,而弟子必欲行而不能知,「更無餘處,必諮此人」;不欲受持者何以名聽法?「少多聽、受、讀、誦,不能究竟成就故,但名聽法」;隨即點出全品行持之要——「若二人善心共同,能得般若波羅蜜;若不同則不能得,是名魔事」,菩薩應覺此事,防令不起,「若自失,當具足;若弟子失,當教令得」。頭陀一重最須明辨:二人「皆有信、有戒」,只是一人能以頭陀莊嚴戒、一人不能——「十二頭陀不名為戒,能行,則戒莊嚴;不能行,不犯戒」,如布施,能行得福,不能行者無罪;正因兩皆無罪,此中不和才純是失般若,不是判罪。論主遂將十二支逐一釋其所以:受阿蘭若法,為「令身遠離憒閙,住於空閑」,且「得是身遠離已,亦當令心遠離五欲、五蓋」;受常乞食法,為離請食僧食之惱——受請得則自矜「我是福德好人故得」,不得則嫌恨懊惱;受納衣法,為離好衣之患——生親著、招賊難,「或至奪命」;受一食法,為惜半日之功——「佛法為行道故,不為益身,如養馬、養猪」;受節量食法,「三分留一分,則身輕安穩」,並引舍利弗自說「我若食五口、六口,足之以水,則足支身」;受中後不飲漿,如馬著轡勒方肯進路;受塚間住法,因「眼見無常」而「易得九相觀,是離欲初門」;受樹下住法,因「如佛生時、成道時、轉法輪時、般涅槃時,皆在樹下」;受露地住法,因樹下猶有愛著雨漏之過,露地則「月光遍照,空中明淨,心易入空三昧」;受常坐不臥,因「諸煩惱賊常伺其便,不宜安臥」,「若欲睡時,脇不著席」;受次第乞食,因「不著於味、不輕眾生、等心憐愍」;受但三衣,「衣趣蓋形,不多不少」,白衣多畜、外道裸形,佛弟子「捨二邊、處中道行」。末後總收:頭陀於古四聖種中「即是三事」,佛常讚歎;而一句話把頭陀放回正位——「佛法唯以智慧為本,不以苦為先」,是法皆助道、隨道故讚,非以苦行為勝。

之下兩番,先廣人不和,後明魔化現。經②把對偶推到極廣:一人「有信、有善」而一人「無信、破戒惡行」;一人能一切施而一人「悋法不施」;一人欲供養四事而一人不欲受;「說法者易悟,聽法人闇鈍」,反之亦然;一人知十二部經「修妬路乃至優波提舍」次第義而一人不知;六波羅蜜之有無、方便力之有無、陀羅尼之有無;一人「離貪欲、瞋恚、睡眠、掉悔、疑」而一人正在五蓋之中;書持之時或有人來勸「三惡道中苦劇,汝何不於是身盡苦入涅槃?何用是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提為」,或讚諸天禪定之樂——「欲界中受五欲快樂,色界中受禪生樂,無色界中受寂滅樂」——而勸取小果;一人「一身無累,自在無礙」而一人多將人眾;師言「汝能隨我意者,當與汝般若波羅蜜」,或弟子欲追隨而師不聽;為財利與法、為財利受法,兩皆成隙;欲至他方「危命之處」、「飢餓、穀貴、無水之處」,一欲去一不欲隨;欲至「豐樂之處」,師一句「汝為利養故追隨我」便令弟子心厭而止;欲過曠野,「賊怖、旃陀羅怖、獵師怖、惡獸毒蛇怖」,師好心相止,弟子疑其吝法;乃至師多檀越數往問訊,「我有因緣,應往到彼」,弟子知其意便止——番番結以「兩不和合」,「當知是為魔事」。論②逐條釋其情:不信者何以從受法?「但欲求名故讀、誦、廣說」,又「不能深心信樂般若故名不信,非都不信」;師不能施,弟子便疑——「師少物不能捨,何況捨身!雖讚說布施,是為欺誑!」;師不受供,或少欲、或羞愧、或恐人謂弟子貪衣食——「此心雖好,不能成般若波羅蜜故,亦是魔事」,這一句是全品判魔事的準繩:不問心好不好,只問般若成不成;「師鈍根者,是誦經師,非解義師」;師有六波羅蜜而輕弟子現前無行,「是師不知弟子聞般若已,後成大事」,弟子亦不知師轉身因緣;有方便者「或時讚歎六波羅蜜;或時斷人著故,破散六波羅蜜」,直信者遂疑之;「陀羅尼有種種」,有能持誦而不解義者、有得實相義而不能次第讀誦者,或師得聞持而「未得大悲故,輕賤弟子,不能教導」;「一切眾生所行法,同則和合」,一離蓋一不離,相輕故不和;勸讚諸天者「雖不能都破其善行,且壞其大乘,授小乘法」;隨意問訊一重,兩頭都能成隙——師嫌「何用是事?損我功德!」,弟子謂被輕賤;賣法一重亦然——弟子鄙師「云何欲賣經法?」,師薄弟子非清淨心;至於他方諸難,弟子「我有身,然後求法」固是惜身,師之相止卻常是好心——「師好心止弟子,不知是壞般若波羅蜜因緣」,或自念「我身自死則可,云何枉他?」;師貴俗緣一重,弟子一句收盡:「師貴俗緣,不貴於法。」經③轉入魔之化現:「惡魔作比丘形像來」,語人「如我所說經即是般若波羅蜜,此經非般若波羅蜜」,於是「有未受記菩薩便墮疑」;或作比丘身勸菩薩「於實際作證」取四果辟支佛道;或「似般若波羅蜜諸魔事起」,乃至似五波羅蜜;或以「聲聞、辟支佛所應行經」與菩薩;或「惡魔作佛身金色丈光」令菩薩貪著,或作佛身及比丘僧令菩薩自期「我於當來世亦當如是從比丘僧為說法」,或「惡魔化作無數百千萬億菩薩」行六波羅蜜以示人——貪著故耗減薩婆若;何以故?深般若中無色乃至無菩提,「一切諸法自性空」故。末後佛自說喻:「譬如閻浮提中珍寶:金、銀、琉璃、車𤦲、馬瑙、珊瑚等寶,多難多賊」,書持般若時多賊多留難亦如是;而能書持不為魔壞者,「當知佛力故」,「十方現在無量無邊阿僧祇諸佛亦助是善男子、善女人」。論③釋魔形——「魔作大沙門形,有重威德,令人受其語」,多持經卷,「呵毀先經,種種自讚所說」;或勸菩薩且置空法——「汝常習此空,於中得證」,先修福德,「坐道場時,爾乃用空」;釋似波羅蜜——「以著心行六波羅蜜,是名似」;釋二乘經何以名魔事——「無有慈悲,不求佛道,但欲自度;雖是好事,破菩薩道,故名魔事」;釋見佛身何以是魔事——「一切煩惱、取相,皆是魔事」,小菩薩未應見佛身而魔作妙形,心著其身,「如未離欲人見天女形」;釋耗減——「如人手捉重寶,有人以少金誑之,捨大價寶而取賤物,是名耗減」;釋珍寶喻——「魔以般若波羅蜜多令眾生入涅槃故,魔作怨賊」,毀呰者「但知三相:貪味、婬欲、瞋恚」;釋魔力所以獨大——「魔是欲界主」,色無色界諸天心柔心細不能破壞,下天無力,唯魔福德智慧具足而為生死根本;釋佛護——初發心菩薩福德智慧薄,諸佛菩薩諸天為破魔事,「如賊繞城,大人守護,小兒不覺」。全品末句歸於平實:「師徒宜應和合,一切惡事,不應計念。」

全品經論各三番相間而進,依卷界分作之上、之下兩分弧,之下卷首帶「之餘」續題。之上立兩不和合之式而詳一重——頭陀之有無,因此重最微細:兩皆有信有戒、兩皆無罪,而般若仍書不成;之下廣列諸重而窮其變——從信戒利鈍直到魔作佛身,人與人之隙說盡了,再說魔乘隙而入之形。之上明和合是因緣法,之下明破和合是魔事法;攢燧之喻立於品首,珍寶之喻收於品末——火須二緣乃得,寶因貴重招賊,一品之義盡在此兩喻之間。

因此,讀每一番對偶時,至少可問三層。其一,這一對不和,過在何處——是有一頭實有其失(懈墮、慳法、無信破戒),還是兩頭各自無過而只是不同(頭陀受不受、徒眾多與寡、隨意與否)?論主明言頭陀「不能行,不犯戒」、受供不受「此心雖好」,可見兩不和合之過,常不在善惡一邊。其二,判準何在——每一條的結語都不是判其人有罪,而是「不得書深般若波羅蜜乃至正憶念」;「不能成般若波羅蜜故,亦是魔事」,魔事之判,不在心地好壞,在般若成與不成。其三,誰是魔——前半品全是人與人之隙,不見魔形;後半品魔作比丘、作佛、作菩薩,形相反而愈莊嚴。順著三番經論讀下去,終會落在論主那句釋語上:「魔以般若波羅蜜多令眾生入涅槃故,魔作怨賊」——賊為寶來,難為法起;所以全品末後不教人怖魔,只教一句「師徒宜應和合」。

依原論次序讀下去

Overview

"The Two Discords" follows on from the deeds of Māra of the preceding chapter, yet it moves its gaze from within one person's mind to the space between two people. The hindrances spoken of in the preceding chapter mostly arise from the practitioner's own mind—a thought stirring, clinging to gain, craving the delight of speaking; with the very first sentence of this chapter a different structure is put in their place: 「復次,須菩提!聽法人欲書、持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、問義、正憶念;說法人懈墮,不欲為說。當知是為菩薩摩訶薩魔事。」 tr. "Again, Subhūti! The hearer of the Dharma wishes to write out and uphold prajñāpāramitā, to read, recite, ask the meaning, and rightly recollect it; the speaker of the Dharma is slack and does not wish to speak it for him. Know that this is a deed of Māra for the bodhisattva-mahāsattva." One wishes to learn and one does not wish to teach—look at either end alone and neither need be a bad person; take them together, and prajñā can be neither written out nor upheld. The sūtra text at once turns it round: 「說法之人心不懈墮,欲令書、持般若波羅蜜;聽法者不欲受之。二心不和,當知是為魔事。」 tr. "The speaker of the Dharma is not slack in mind and wishes to have prajñāpāramitā written out and upheld; the hearer of the Dharma does not wish to receive it. The two minds are not in accord; know that this is a deed of Māra." The eye of the chapter's name is set up right here: a deed of Māra need not come from outside; when the speaker and the hearer of the Dharma are such that 「二心不和」 tr. "the two minds are not in accord", that one crack is the gate of Māra. The treatise explanation states the principle in full at the very outset: 「一切有為法,因緣和合故生,眾緣離則無。譬如攢燧求火,有鑽、有母,二事因緣得火」 tr. "Every conditioned dharma arises because causes and conditions come together; when the conditions part, it is not. It is like seeking fire with a fire-drill: there is the drill and there is the base, and by the causes and conditions of the two things the fire is got"—writing out prajñā, and so on up to rightly recollecting it, is also like this: 「所謂師、弟子同心同事故,乃得書成」 tr. "that is to say, only because teacher and disciple are of one mind and one undertaking can the writing out be completed". The whole chapter, three rounds of sūtra and three rounds of treatise spanning the two fascicles sixty-eight and sixty-nine, spreads out from these pair after pair of 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two not in accord": the First Part, one sūtra and one treatise, sets up the form of the pairs and explains the twelve dhūta practices in detail; the Last Part, two sūtras and two treatises, lays out at length the marks of the many discords of teacher and disciple, turns to the four types of the evil Māra's transformed appearances, and closes with the simile of the precious things with many thieves and the protection of the Buddha's power.

The one round of the First Part sets up the form and makes clear the dhūta practices. Sūtra ① lists four pairs: one wishes to write out and uphold while one is slack; one wishes to teach while one wishes to go to another region; one 「貴重布施衣服、飲食、臥具、醫藥、資生之物」 tr. "values highly the giving of clothing, food and drink, bedding, medicine, and the things that support life" while one 「少欲知足,行遠離行,攝念精進,一心智慧」 tr. "has few desires and knows contentment, practises the practice of separation, collects his mindfulness and is vigorous, with one mind and with wisdom"; one takes up the twelve dhūta practices while one does not—each pair is stated once in each direction, the speaker and the hearer exchanging places, and the concluding sentence is always the same: 「兩不和合,不得書般若波羅蜜」 tr. "the two are not in accord, and prajñāpāramitā cannot be written out". Treatise ① first sets up the thesis with the simile of the fire-drill, then explains difficulty by difficulty: why should one whose mind is covered by the five hindrances act as a teacher? 「是人著世間樂,不觀空、無常,雖能心知、口說,不能自行」 tr. "This person clings to worldly pleasure and does not contemplate emptiness and impermanence; though he can know it in his mind and speak it with his mouth, he cannot practise it himself", while the disciple is set on practising and cannot know, so 「更無餘處,必諮此人」 tr. "there is nowhere else to go; he must consult this person"; why is one who does not wish to receive and uphold called a hearer of the Dharma? 「少多聽、受、讀、誦,不能究竟成就故,但名聽法」 tr. "Because he hears, receives, reads, and recites a little, and cannot bring it to final accomplishment, he is merely called a hearer of the Dharma"; it then at once points out the essential of practice for the whole chapter—「若二人善心共同,能得般若波羅蜜;若不同則不能得,是名魔事」 tr. "If the two people's wholesome minds are shared and alike, they can obtain prajñāpāramitā; if they are not alike, they cannot obtain it—this is called a deed of Māra"; the bodhisattva should be aware of this matter and guard against its arising: 「若自失,當具足;若弟子失,當教令得」 tr. "if the fault is his own, he should make it complete; if the fault is the disciple's, he should teach him so that he obtains it". The round of the dhūta practices most needs clear discernment: the two people 「皆有信、有戒」 tr. "both have faith and have precepts"; it is only that one can adorn the precepts with the dhūta practices and one cannot—「十二頭陀不名為戒,能行,則戒莊嚴;不能行,不犯戒」 tr. "The twelve dhūta practices are not called precepts; if one can practise them, the precepts are adorned; if one cannot practise them, one does not break the precepts"; it is like giving: one who can practise it obtains merit, and one who cannot practise it has no offence; precisely because both are without offence, the discord here is purely the loss of prajñā, not a verdict of offence. The treatise-author then explains the twelve members one by one, each with its reason: one takes up the dharma of the araṇya in order 「令身遠離憒閙,住於空閑」 tr. "to let the body be far removed from noise and bustle and dwell in empty quiet", and 「得是身遠離已,亦當令心遠離五欲、五蓋」 tr. "having obtained this separation of the body, one should also let the mind be separated from the five desires and the five hindrances"; one takes up the dharma of always begging for food to be free of the vexations of invited meals and Saṅgha meals—if invited and he gets the meal, he prides himself, 「我是福德好人故得」 tr. "I get this because I am a good man of merit", and if he does not get it, he resents and is vexed; one takes up the dharma of robes of cast-off rags to be free of the troubles of fine clothing—it gives rise to fond clinging and invites the danger of thieves, 「或至奪命」 tr. "sometimes even to the taking of life"; one takes up the dharma of one meal to spare the effort of half a day—「佛法為行道故,不為益身,如養馬、養猪」 tr. "the Buddha's Dharma is for the sake of practising the path, not for the benefit of the body, as one feeds a horse or feeds a pig"; one takes up the dharma of eating in measured quantity: 「三分留一分,則身輕安穩」 tr. "of three portions one leaves one, and then the body is light and at ease", and Śāriputra's own words are cited: 「我若食五口、六口,足之以水,則足支身」 tr. "If I eat five or six mouthfuls and fill up with water, that is enough to support the body"; one takes up not drinking juices after midday, like a horse that is willing to go forward on the road only once it is fitted with bridle and bit; one takes up the dharma of dwelling among the tombs because 「眼見無常」 tr. "the eye sees impermanence", and one 「易得九相觀,是離欲初門」 tr. "easily obtains the contemplation of the nine marks, which is the first gate of freedom from desire"; one takes up the dharma of dwelling under a tree because 「如佛生時、成道時、轉法輪時、般涅槃時,皆在樹下」 tr. "as when the Buddha was born, when he attained the path, when he turned the wheel of the Dharma, and when he entered parinirvāṇa, all under a tree"; one takes up the dharma of dwelling in the open because under a tree there are still the faults of fond attachment and of rain leaking through, while in the open 「月光遍照,空中明淨,心易入空三昧」 tr. "the moonlight shines everywhere, the sky is bright and clear, and the mind easily enters the emptiness samādhi"; one takes up always sitting, never lying down, because 「諸煩惱賊常伺其便,不宜安臥」 tr. "the thieves of the afflictions are always watching for their opening; it is not fitting to lie at ease", and 「若欲睡時,脇不著席」 tr. "when one wishes to sleep, one's side does not touch the mat"; one takes up begging from house to house in order because one 「不著於味、不輕眾生、等心憐愍」 tr. "does not cling to flavours, does not belittle beings, and has pity on them with an even mind"; one takes up keeping only the three robes: 「衣趣蓋形,不多不少」 tr. "the robes serve only to cover the body, neither too many nor too few"; the white-robed store up many, the outside paths go naked, and the Buddha's disciples 「捨二邊、處中道行」 tr. "give up the two extremes and practise abiding in the middle way". At the end the whole is gathered up: among the four noble lineages of old, the dhūta practices 「即是三事」 tr. "are just three matters", and the Buddha always praised them; and one sentence puts the dhūta practices back in their proper place—「佛法唯以智慧為本,不以苦為先」 tr. "The Buddha's Dharma takes wisdom alone as its root; it does not put suffering first"; these dharmas all aid the path and are praised because they follow the path, not because ascetic practice is held to be superior.

The two rounds of the Last Part first lay out at length the discords between persons, then make clear Māra's transformed appearances. Sūtra ② pushes the pairs to their widest extent: one 「有信、有善」 tr. "has faith and has goodness" while one 「無信、破戒惡行」 tr. "has no faith, breaks the precepts, and acts evilly"; one can give everything while one 「悋法不施」 tr. "begrudges the Dharma and does not give it"; one wishes to make offerings of the four requisites while one does not wish to receive them; 「說法者易悟,聽法人闇鈍」 tr. "the speaker of the Dharma understands easily, while the hearer of the Dharma is dark and dull", and the reverse likewise; one knows the order and meaning of the twelve divisions of the scriptures, 「修妬路乃至優波提舍」 tr. "from sūtra up to upadeśa", while one does not; having or not having the six perfections, having or not having the power of skilful means, having or not having dhāraṇī; one 「離貪欲、瞋恚、睡眠、掉悔、疑」 tr. "is free of desire, ill will, sloth and torpor, restlessness and remorse, and doubt" while one is right in the midst of the five hindrances; at the time of writing out and upholding, perhaps someone comes and urges: 「三惡道中苦劇,汝何不於是身盡苦入涅槃?何用是阿耨多羅三藐三菩提為」 tr. "The suffering in the three evil paths is severe; why do you not end suffering in this very body and enter nirvāṇa? What use is this anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi (unsurpassed, right, and complete awakening)?", or praises the pleasures of the gods' meditation and absorption—「欲界中受五欲快樂,色界中受禪生樂,無色界中受寂滅樂」 tr. "in the desire realm one receives the joyful pleasures of the five desires, in the form realm one receives the pleasure born of meditation, in the formless realm one receives the pleasure of quiescence"—and urges him to take a small fruit; one 「一身無累,自在無礙」 tr. "is a single body without encumbrance, free and unobstructed" while one leads many followers; the teacher says, 「汝能隨我意者,當與汝般若波羅蜜」 tr. "If you can go along with my wishes, I will give you prajñāpāramitā", or the disciple wishes to follow him and the teacher does not allow it; giving the Dharma for wealth and gain, receiving the Dharma for wealth and gain—both make a crack; wishing to go to another region, to 「危命之處」 tr. "a place where life is in danger", to 「飢餓、穀貴、無水之處」 tr. "a place of famine, dear grain, and no water", one wishes to go and one does not wish to follow; wishing to go to 「豐樂之處」 tr. "a prosperous and pleasant place", the teacher's one sentence, 「汝為利養故追隨我」 tr. "You follow me for the sake of gain and offerings", makes the disciple weary in mind so that he stops; wishing to cross a wilderness with its 「賊怖、旃陀羅怖、獵師怖、惡獸毒蛇怖」 tr. "fear of thieves, fear of caṇḍālas, fear of hunters, fear of evil beasts and poisonous snakes", the teacher kindly holds him back, and the disciple suspects him of begrudging the Dharma; and so on up to the teacher who has many donors and often goes to call on them—「我有因緣,應往到彼」 tr. "I have a reason; I must go there"—and the disciple, knowing his intent, stops—round after round concludes with 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two are not in accord", 「當知是為魔事」 tr. "know that this is a deed of Māra". Treatise ② explains the circumstances item by item: why would one without faith receive the Dharma from another? 「但欲求名故讀、誦、廣說」 tr. "he reads, recites, and expounds widely only because he wishes to seek a name", and further, 「不能深心信樂般若故名不信,非都不信」 tr. "because he cannot with a deep mind have faith in and delight in prajñā, he is called without faith; it is not that he has no faith at all"; when the teacher cannot give, the disciple then doubts—「師少物不能捨,何況捨身!雖讚說布施,是為欺誑!」 tr. "The teacher cannot give up a small thing—how much less give up his body! Though he praises and speaks of giving, this is deceit!"; the teacher does not accept offerings, whether from having few desires, from shame, or for fear that people will say the disciple craves clothing and food—「此心雖好,不能成般若波羅蜜故,亦是魔事」 tr. "Though this mind is good, because it cannot accomplish prajñāpāramitā, it too is a deed of Māra"; this sentence is the whole chapter's measure for judging a deed of Māra: it does not ask whether the mind is good or not, it asks only whether prajñā is accomplished or not; 「師鈍根者,是誦經師,非解義師」 tr. "A teacher of dull faculties is a teacher who recites the sūtras, not a teacher who explains the meaning"; the teacher has the six perfections and belittles the disciple for having no practice at present—「是師不知弟子聞般若已,後成大事」 tr. "this teacher does not know that the disciple, having heard prajñā, will later accomplish the great matter", nor does the disciple know the causes and conditions of the teacher's turning about; one who has skilful means 「或時讚歎六波羅蜜;或時斷人著故,破散六波羅蜜」 tr. "at times praises the six perfections; at times, to cut off people's attachment, breaks up and scatters the six perfections", and one of straightforward faith therefore doubts him; 「陀羅尼有種種」 tr. "dhāraṇī are of many kinds": there are those who can uphold and recite but do not understand the meaning, and those who have obtained the meaning of the real mark but cannot read and recite in order, or the teacher has obtained hearing and retaining yet 「未得大悲故,輕賤弟子,不能教導」 tr. "because he has not yet obtained great compassion, belittles and despises the disciple and cannot teach and guide him"; 「一切眾生所行法,同則和合」 tr. "among all the dharmas that beings practise, where they are the same there is accord": one has left the coverings and one has not, and because they belittle each other they are not in accord; the one who urges and praises the gods 「雖不能都破其善行,且壞其大乘,授小乘法」 tr. "though he cannot wholly break his wholesome practice, for now ruins his Great Vehicle and gives him the dharma of the Small Vehicle"; in the round of calling on him at will, both ends can make a crack—the teacher dislikes it, 「何用是事?損我功德!」 tr. "What use is this? It diminishes my merit!", and the disciple thinks himself belittled and despised; the round of selling the Dharma is likewise—the disciple scorns the teacher, 「云何欲賣經法?」 tr. "How can he wish to sell the Dharma of the sūtras?", and the teacher looks down on the disciple as not having a pure mind; as for the dangers of other regions, the disciple's 「我有身,然後求法」 tr. "I must have a body; only then can I seek the Dharma" is indeed sparing the body, yet the teacher's holding him back is often a good mind—「師好心止弟子,不知是壞般若波羅蜜因緣」 tr. "the teacher holds back the disciple with a good mind, not knowing that this is a cause and condition for ruining prajñāpāramitā", or he thinks to himself, 「我身自死則可,云何枉他?」 tr. "If I myself die, that is acceptable; how could I wrong another?"; in the round of the teacher who values worldly ties, the disciple's one sentence gathers it all up: 「師貴俗緣,不貴於法。」 tr. "The teacher values worldly ties; he does not value the Dharma." Sūtra ③ turns to Māra's transformed appearances: 「惡魔作比丘形像來」 tr. "the evil Māra comes in the form and likeness of a bhikṣu" and tells people, 「如我所說經即是般若波羅蜜,此經非般若波羅蜜」 tr. "the sūtra that I speak is prajñāpāramitā; this sūtra is not prajñāpāramitā", whereupon 「有未受記菩薩便墮疑」 tr. "a bodhisattva who has not received the prediction falls into doubt"; or he makes the body of a bhikṣu and urges the bodhisattva 「於實際作證」 tr. "to realise it at the limit of reality" and take the four fruits or the path of the pratyekabuddha; or 「似般若波羅蜜諸魔事起」 tr. "the deeds of Māra of the semblance of prajñāpāramitā arise", and so on up to the semblance of the five perfections; or he gives the bodhisattva 「聲聞、辟支佛所應行經」 tr. "the sūtras that śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas should practise"; or 「惡魔作佛身金色丈光」 tr. "the evil Māra makes the body of a Buddha, golden-coloured with a fathom of light", so that the bodhisattva craves and clings to it; or he makes the body of a Buddha with a Saṅgha of bhikṣus, so that the bodhisattva expects of himself, 「我於當來世亦當如是從比丘僧為說法」 tr. "In a coming age I too shall in this way, attended by a Saṅgha of bhikṣus, speak the Dharma"; or 「惡魔化作無數百千萬億菩薩」 tr. "the evil Māra conjures up countless hundreds of thousands of myriads of koṭi of bodhisattvas" practising the six perfections to show people—because of craving and clinging, sarvajñā is diminished; why? because in the deep prajñā there is no form and so on up to no awakening, since 「一切諸法自性空」 tr. "all dharmas are empty of self-nature". At the end the Buddha himself speaks a simile: 「譬如閻浮提中珍寶:金、銀、琉璃、車𤦲、馬瑙、珊瑚等寶,多難多賊」 tr. "It is like the precious things of Jambudvīpa—gold, silver, beryl, giant clam, agate, coral and such treasures—which have many difficulties and many thieves"; when prajñā is written out and upheld there are likewise many thieves and many hindrances; and as for the one who can write out and uphold it and is not ruined by Māra, 「當知佛力故」 tr. "know that it is by the Buddha's power", and 「十方現在無量無邊阿僧祇諸佛亦助是善男子、善女人」 tr. "the measureless, boundless, asaṃkhyeya buddhas now present in the ten directions also help these good men and good women". Treatise ③ explains Māra's forms—「魔作大沙門形,有重威德,令人受其語」 tr. "Māra makes the form of a great śramaṇa, of weighty majesty and virtue, so that people accept his words"; mostly carrying sūtra scrolls, he 「呵毀先經,種種自讚所說」 tr. "rebukes and disparages the earlier sūtras and in all kinds of ways praises what he himself speaks"; or he urges the bodhisattva to set aside the dharma of emptiness for now—「汝常習此空,於中得證」 tr. "If you always train in this emptiness, you will realise it therein"—and to cultivate merit first: 「坐道場時,爾乃用空」 tr. "when you sit at the seat of awakening, only then use emptiness"; it explains the semblance of the perfections—「以著心行六波羅蜜,是名似」 tr. "to practise the six perfections with a clinging mind is called the semblance"; it explains why the sūtras of the two vehicles are called deeds of Māra—「無有慈悲,不求佛道,但欲自度;雖是好事,破菩薩道,故名魔事」 tr. "They have no kindness and compassion, do not seek the Buddha path, and wish only to cross over themselves; though they are good things, they break the bodhisattva path, and so are called deeds of Māra"; it explains why seeing the body of a Buddha is a deed of Māra—「一切煩惱、取相,皆是魔事」 tr. "every affliction and every grasping at marks is a deed of Māra": a small bodhisattva is not yet fit to see the body of a Buddha, and Māra makes a wondrous form, so that the mind clings to that body, 「如未離欲人見天女形」 tr. "like a person not yet free of desire who sees the form of a heavenly maiden"; it explains diminishment—「如人手捉重寶,有人以少金誑之,捨大價寶而取賤物,是名耗減」 tr. "It is like a person holding a heavy treasure in his hand, whom someone deceives with a little gold, so that he lets go the treasure of great price and takes the cheap thing—this is called diminishment"; it explains the simile of the precious things—「魔以般若波羅蜜多令眾生入涅槃故,魔作怨賊」 tr. "Because prajñāpāramitā leads many beings into nirvāṇa, Māra makes himself an enemy and thief"; those who disparage it 「但知三相:貪味、婬欲、瞋恚」 tr. "know only three marks: craving for flavours, sexual desire, and ill will"; it explains why Māra's power alone is great—「魔是欲界主」 tr. "Māra is the lord of the desire realm": the gods of the form and formless realms have soft and subtle minds and cannot break and ruin it, the lower gods have no power, and only Māra is complete in merit and wisdom and is the root of birth and death; it explains the Buddha's protection—the merit and wisdom of the bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind are thin, and the buddhas, the bodhisattvas, and the gods break the deeds of Māra for him, 「如賊繞城,大人守護,小兒不覺」 tr. "as when thieves surround a city, the grown men keep guard and the small children do not notice". The last sentence of the whole chapter returns to plainness: 「師徒宜應和合,一切惡事,不應計念。」 tr. "Teacher and disciple should be in accord, and should not take any evil thing to heart."

For the whole chapter the sūtra and the treatise advance in alternation, three rounds each; by the boundary of the fascicles it is divided into two arcs, the First Part and the Last Part, and the head of the Last Part's fascicle carries the continued title 「之餘」 tr. "the remainder". The First Part sets up the form of the two discords and details one round—having or not having the dhūta practices—because this round is the subtlest: both have faith and have precepts, both are without offence, and yet prajñā still cannot be written out; the Last Part lays out the many rounds at length and exhausts their variations—from faith and precepts, keen and dull, all the way to Māra making the body of a Buddha: the cracks between person and person are told to the full, and then the forms in which Māra enters through the crack are told. The First Part makes clear that accord is a dharma of causes and conditions; the Last Part makes clear that the breaking of accord is a dharma of the deeds of Māra; the simile of the fire-drill stands at the head of the chapter, and the simile of the precious things gathers it up at the end—fire can be got only with two conditions, and treasure invites thieves because it is precious and weighty; the meaning of the whole chapter lies entirely between these two similes.

Therefore, in reading each round of pairs, one can ask at least three layers of questions. First, where does the fault of this pair's discord lie—does one end truly have a fault (slackness, begrudging the Dharma, no faith and broken precepts), or is each end without fault and only different (taking up the dhūta practices or not, many followers or few, going along with wishes or not)? The treatise-author says plainly that of the dhūta practices 「不能行,不犯戒」 tr. "if one cannot practise them, one does not break the precepts", and of accepting or not accepting offerings, 「此心雖好」 tr. "though this mind is good"; from this one can see that the fault of the two discords often does not lie on the side of good or of evil. Second, where does the criterion lie—the concluding phrase of each item never judges the person to have an offence, but says 「不得書深般若波羅蜜乃至正憶念」 tr. "the deep prajñāpāramitā cannot be written out, and so on up to rightly recollected"; 「不能成般若波羅蜜故,亦是魔事」 tr. "because it cannot accomplish prajñāpāramitā, it too is a deed of Māra": the judgement of a deed of Māra does not lie in whether the mind is good or bad, but in whether prajñā is accomplished or not. Third, who is Māra—the first half of the chapter is all cracks between person and person, and no form of Māra is seen; in the second half Māra makes a bhikṣu, makes a Buddha, makes bodhisattvas, and the forms grow instead ever more adorned. Read on along these three rounds of sūtra and treatise, and one will come at last to that explanatory sentence of the treatise-author: 「魔以般若波羅蜜多令眾生入涅槃故,魔作怨賊」 tr. "Because prajñāpāramitā leads many beings into nirvāṇa, Māra makes himself an enemy and thief"—the thief comes for the treasure, the difficulty arises for the Dharma; and so at its end the whole chapter does not teach people to fear Māra, but teaches only the one sentence 「師徒宜應和合」 tr. "teacher and disciple should be in accord".

Reading On in the Order of the Treatise

本品 2 葉Chapter contents · 2
  1. 47-01兩不和合品之上The Two Discords, Part 1 of 2兩不和合品之上:說聽四對魔事——懈墮不欲說、欲至他方、貴重供養與少欲、十二頭陀有無;攢燧求火喻;十二頭陀逐項因緣(經+論)卷68
  2. 47-02兩不和合品之下The Two Discords, Part 2 of 2兩不和合品之下:說聽兩造諸對偶魔事、外緣勸退、惡魔化現四型、閻浮提珍寶喻與諸佛擁護(經+論)卷69
義疏 · 承衍Exposition · Further Resonances

承衍

〈兩不和合品〉的義脈,前有所承,後有所啟。所承者是前之〈魔事品〉:彼品開卷,須菩提問「云何善男子、善女人,求於佛道,生諸留難?」,佛遂廣說留難之相——彼品所列,多起於行者自身:樂說之著、書寫時「若國土念起、聚落念起、城邑念起」而「惡魔復益其念」、貪著利養、為聲聞深經轉心;彼品末後並以酥毒為喻判大小之路——「譬如人以酥和毒,毒勢則歇,不能害人」,般若如酥,餘經如但服毒。本品正躡此而進一層:一人心上的留難說過了,便說二人之間的留難——開卷即是「聽法人欲書、持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、問義、正憶念;說法人懈墮,不欲為說」,說者聽者兩造,番番對舉,結句同是「兩不和合,不得書般若波羅蜜」。前品說賊在念起,本品說賊在隙生;隙既說盡,魔遂現形——品末惡魔作比丘、作佛身、作菩薩,皆乘二心之隙而入。所啟者,品中已露端倪:本品收於佛力——「若菩薩摩訶薩書般若乃至正憶念,魔事不起,當知是佛力,亦是十方諸佛及諸菩薩所擁護」;諸佛何以如此護此一經?次品〈佛母品〉開卷即答,以母子為喻——「譬如母人有子若五、若十」,諸子勤求救療、常求樂具供養其母,「所以者何?生育我等,示我世間」;「佛常以佛眼視是深般若波羅蜜」,以「是深般若波羅蜜能生諸佛,能與諸佛一切智,能示世間相」故。本品說護,次品說護之所以:佛之護般若,不是護一部經卷,是子之護母——義脈便順此而下。

後來古德讀此品,於品名一事所存可誌。本論底本題「兩不和合品」;宮本卷題別作「兩過品」,明本並於題下牒經本異名曰「經作兩不和合過品」;聖本、聖乙本、石本題號較底本差一階,與前數品一貫,如實誌之。所釋大經之傳本,此品題正作「兩過品第四十七」;為所釋大經作科疏、最重綱目開合的一家,其科目於此品亦標「兩過品第四十七」,而其疏文釋前品魔事之文,已自用「兩不和合」四字述師徒授受之不諧——兩名並見其書,可知二題在古德眼中本不相妨。另有一家古德嘗為此論自身作疏,其書今存殘卷,而本品不在所存之列,如實誌之,不強牽合;遍檢所及之天台一系止觀疏記,「十二頭陀」之目雖屢見,皆其自釋禪法戒行之通義,未見具名徵引本品品題或牒引本品之文——本品古德鏡照較前數品為薄,亦如實誌之。兩名之義各有所繫:曰「兩過」者,舉其人——說者聽者兩造互有所失;曰「兩不和合」者,舉其事——正取經文逐番之結句「兩不和合,不得書般若波羅蜜」。一責其人,一指其事,並誌不判;本版從底本作〈兩不和合品〉。

把這一路承衍帶回本品,古德所誌的品名之歧,正照見本品義理之深處:若從「兩過」讀,似乎總要找出誰錯——然而品中最要緊的幾重對偶,恰恰兩頭無過:頭陀之不受,「不能行,不犯戒」;供養之不受,「此心雖好」;相止於險道,是「師好心止弟子」。好心與好心相遇,般若仍書不成——這才是本品比前品更深一層的地方:留難不必由惡起,「不知是壞般若波羅蜜因緣」一句,論主於豐樂、曠野兩番連說兩遍,正明魔事之最險者是不自知。若從「兩不和合」讀,則判準自明:「一切有為法,因緣和合故生,眾緣離則無」——書持般若是因緣所生法,「有鑽、有母,二事因緣得火」,缺一緣即無火,無火不必問鑽與母誰之罪。故全品判魔事只用一個尺度:般若成,則非魔事;般若不成,「不能成般若波羅蜜故,亦是魔事」——心好不好,另是一事。而兩頭之失皆有其救,品中早已給出:「若自失,當具足;若弟子失,當教令得」。

因此,〈兩不和合品〉最終留下的,是一條可反覆使用的問路法:我從師受法而心生嫌隙時,記得「弟子見師有過故,不欲受法」正是品中所列魔事之一——師之過未必是我離法之理由,「少多聽、受、讀、誦,不能究竟成就故,但名聽法」,離師易,成就難;我為人說法而欲揀擇弟子時,記得「是師不知弟子聞般若已,後成大事,但以現前無六波羅蜜,不肯教化」——現前之鈍,不是來日之量;我自省其心而覺無過時,記得「此心雖好,不能成般若波羅蜜故,亦是魔事」——問心無愧之處,正須再問一句般若成了沒有;我見相好威德而心生貪著時,記得「一切煩惱、取相,皆是魔事」,魔能作比丘、作佛身、作菩薩,「捨大價寶而取賤物,是名耗減」;我遇留難四起而自疑力薄時,記得「當知佛力故」——「如賊繞城,大人守護,小兒不覺」,護不待覺而後有。在每一番行持裡把這幾問答好,便知全品末句何以如此平實:「師徒宜應和合,一切惡事,不應計念」——般若如火,須兩緣乃燃;守住和合這一緣,餘事魔不能為。

Further Resonances

The vein of meaning in the chapter "The Two Discords" has something it inherits before it and something it opens after it. What it inherits is the preceding chapter, "The Deeds of Māra": at that chapter's opening Subhūti asks 「云何善男子、善女人,求於佛道,生諸留難?」 tr. "How is it that good men and good women, seeking the Buddha path, give rise to hindrances?", and the Buddha then speaks at length of the marks of hindrance—what that chapter lists mostly arises within the practitioner himself: clinging to eloquence; in writing out, the moment when 「若國土念起、聚落念起、城邑念起」 tr. "if thoughts of lands arise, thoughts of villages arise, thoughts of towns arise" and 「惡魔復益其念」 tr. "the evil Māra further increases these thoughts"; craving and clinging to gain and offerings; the mind turning aside for the deep sūtras of the śrāvakas; and at its close that chapter also uses the simile of ghee and poison to judge between the road of the Great and the road of the Small—「譬如人以酥和毒,毒勢則歇,不能害人」 tr. "It is like a person who mixes poison with ghee: the force of the poison then subsides and cannot harm anyone"; prajñā is like the ghee, and the other sūtras are like taking the poison alone. This chapter follows precisely on from this and goes one layer further: the hindrances within one person's mind having been spoken of, it then speaks of the hindrances between two people—its opening is at once 「聽法人欲書、持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、問義、正憶念;說法人懈墮,不欲為說」 tr. "The hearer of the Dharma wishes to write out and uphold prajñāpāramitā, to read, recite, ask its meaning, and rightly recollect it; the speaker of the Dharma is slack and does not wish to speak it for him," the two parties, speaker and hearer, set against each other round after round, and the closing sentence the same each time: 「兩不和合,不得書般若波羅蜜」 tr. "The two are not in accord, and they cannot write out prajñāpāramitā." The preceding chapter says the thief lies in the rising of thoughts; this chapter says the thief is born in the gap; once the gaps have all been told, Māra then appears in his own form—at the chapter's end the evil Māra takes the form of a bhikṣu, makes the body of a Buddha, makes bodhisattvas, all entering by the gap between the two minds. As for what it opens, the chapter already shows its first signs: it closes on the Buddha's power—「若菩薩摩訶薩書般若乃至正憶念,魔事不起,當知是佛力,亦是十方諸佛及諸菩薩所擁護」 tr. "If the bodhisattva-mahāsattva writes out prajñā and so on up to rightly recollecting it, and the deeds of Māra do not arise, know that it is by the Buddha's power, and is also the guarding and protection of the buddhas of the ten directions and of the bodhisattvas"; why do the buddhas guard this one sūtra so? The next chapter, "The Mother of the Buddhas," answers at its very opening, taking mother and sons as its simile—「譬如母人有子若五、若十」 tr. "It is like a mother who has sons, whether five, or ten": the sons diligently seek her cure and constantly seek things of comfort with which to make offerings to their mother—「所以者何?生育我等,示我世間」 tr. "Why is this? She gave us birth and raised us; she showed us the world"; 「佛常以佛眼視是深般若波羅蜜」 tr. "The Buddha constantly regards this deep prajñāpāramitā with the Buddha-eye," because 「是深般若波羅蜜能生諸佛,能與諸佛一切智,能示世間相」 tr. "this deep prajñāpāramitā can give birth to the buddhas, can give the buddhas omniscience, and can show the mark of the world." This chapter speaks of the protection; the next chapter speaks of the reason for the protection: the Buddha's guarding of prajñā is not the guarding of a volume of scripture; it is a son's guarding of his mother—and the vein of meaning flows on downward from this.

Among the later ancient masters who read this chapter, what they preserved on the matter of the chapter's name is worth recording. This treatise's base text heads it 「兩不和合品」 tr. "The Two Discords"; the fascicle heading of the Palace edition reads otherwise, 「兩過品」 tr. "The Two Faults," and the Ming edition moreover cites beneath the title the sūtra-side variant name, saying 「經作兩不和合過品」 tr. "the sūtra has ‘The Faults of the Two Discords’"; the title numbering of the Shōgozō manuscript, the Shōgozō B, and the Ishiyama-dera manuscript differs from the base text by one step, consistent with the several preceding chapters, and this is recorded as it is. In the transmitted text of the great sūtra that it explains, this chapter's title reads precisely 「兩過品第四十七」 tr. "Chapter Forty-seven, The Two Faults"; the one house that composed a sectional commentary on the great sūtra it explains, laying the greatest weight on the opening and closing of the outline, likewise marks this chapter in its outline as 「兩過品第四十七」 tr. "Chapter Forty-seven, The Two Faults," while its commentary text, in explaining the passage on the deeds of Māra in the preceding chapter, already uses of its own accord the four characters 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two discords" to describe the disharmony of teacher and disciple in giving and receiving—the two names appear side by side in the one book, from which one can know that in the eyes of the ancient masters the two titles never stood in each other's way. There is another ancient master who once composed a commentary on this treatise itself; his work survives today in incomplete fascicles, and this chapter is not among those that survive—this is recorded as it is, without forcing a connection; and in all the commentaries and records on calming and contemplation of the Tiantai line that could be searched, although the heading 「十二頭陀」 tr. "the twelve dhūta practices" appears again and again, it is always their own general explanation of meditation methods and the practice of the precepts, and nowhere is this chapter's title found cited by name, nor the text of this chapter quoted—the ancient masters' mirroring of this chapter is thinner than for the several preceding chapters, and this too is recorded as it is. The meanings of the two names each have their own tie: the name 「兩過」 tr. "the two faults" picks out the persons—speaker and hearer, the two parties, each at fault toward the other; the name 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two discords" picks out the matter—taking precisely the closing sentence of the sūtra text in round after round, 「兩不和合,不得書般若波羅蜜」 tr. "The two are not in accord, and they cannot write out prajñāpāramitā." One reproaches the persons, the other points to the matter; both are recorded without judgement; this edition follows the base text and reads "The Two Discords."

Bringing this whole line of further resonances back to this chapter, the divergence in the chapter's name that the ancient masters recorded precisely illuminates the depths of the chapter's meaning: if one reads it as 「兩過」 tr. "the two faults," it seems one must always find out who is wrong—yet the few most crucial pairings in the chapter are exactly those in which neither end is at fault: not taking up the dhūta practices—「不能行,不犯戒」 tr. "if one cannot practise them, one does not break the precepts"; not receiving offerings—「此心雖好」 tr. "though this mind is good"; holding each other back from a dangerous road—it is 「師好心止弟子」 tr. "the teacher, with a good mind, holds back the disciple." A good mind meets a good mind, and still prajñā does not get written out—this is exactly where this chapter goes one layer deeper than the preceding one: hindrance need not arise from evil; the sentence 「不知是壞般若波羅蜜因緣」 tr. "not knowing that this is a cause and condition for ruining prajñāpāramitā" the treatise-author says twice over, in the two rounds of the prosperous and pleasant land and of the wilderness, making plain precisely that the most dangerous of the deeds of Māra is not knowing it oneself. If one reads it as 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two discords," then the criterion is plain of itself: 「一切有為法,因緣和合故生,眾緣離則無」 tr. "Every conditioned dharma arises because causes and conditions come together; when the conditions part, it is not"—writing out and upholding prajñā is a dharma born of causes and conditions; 「有鑽、有母,二事因緣得火」 tr. "there is the drill and there is the base, and by the causes and conditions of the two things the fire is got"—lack one condition and there is no fire, and where there is no fire one need not ask whose fault it is, the drill's or the base's. So the whole chapter judges the deeds of Māra by a single measure: if prajñā is accomplished, it is not a deed of Māra; if prajñā is not accomplished, 「不能成般若波羅蜜故,亦是魔事」 tr. "because it cannot accomplish prajñāpāramitā, this too is a deed of Māra"—whether the mind is good or not is another matter. And the loss at either end has its remedy, which the chapter has long since given: 「若自失,當具足;若弟子失,當教令得」 tr. "If he himself is lacking, he should make it complete; if the disciple is lacking, he should teach him and cause him to obtain it."

Therefore what the chapter "The Two Discords" finally leaves behind is a way of asking the road that can be used again and again: when I receive the Dharma from a teacher and a rift of dislike arises in my mind, I remember that 「弟子見師有過故,不欲受法」 tr. "because the disciple sees that the teacher has faults, he does not wish to receive the Dharma" is precisely one of the deeds of Māra listed in the chapter—the teacher's fault is not necessarily a reason for me to leave the Dharma; 「少多聽、受、讀、誦,不能究竟成就故,但名聽法」 tr. "hearing, receiving, reading, and reciting a little, more or less, he cannot accomplish it to the end, and so it is only called hearing the Dharma"—leaving the teacher is easy; accomplishing is hard; when I speak the Dharma for others and wish to pick and choose my disciples, I remember 「是師不知弟子聞般若已,後成大事,但以現前無六波羅蜜,不肯教化」 tr. "this teacher does not know that the disciple, having heard prajñā, will later accomplish the great matter, and only because at present he lacks the six perfections, is unwilling to teach and transform him"—dullness in the present is not the measure of the days to come; when I examine my own mind and find no fault, I remember 「此心雖好,不能成般若波羅蜜故,亦是魔事」 tr. "though this mind is good, because it cannot accomplish prajñāpāramitā, this too is a deed of Māra"—precisely where I ask my heart and find no shame, I must ask one question more: has prajñā been accomplished or not; when I see the marks and excellences and majestic virtue and craving and clinging arise in my mind, I remember 「一切煩惱、取相,皆是魔事」 tr. "every affliction and every grasping at marks is a deed of Māra"; Māra can take the form of a bhikṣu, make the body of a Buddha, make bodhisattvas—「捨大價寶而取賤物,是名耗減」 tr. "he lets go the treasure of great price and takes the cheap thing—this is called diminishment"; when I meet hindrances rising on all sides and doubt that my strength is thin, I remember 「當知佛力故」 tr. "know that it is by the Buddha's power"—「如賊繞城,大人守護,小兒不覺」 tr. "as when thieves surround a city, the grown men keep guard and the small children do not notice": the protection does not wait for one's noticing before it is there. Answer these few questions well in every round of practice, and one knows why the last sentence of the whole chapter is so plain: 「師徒宜應和合,一切惡事,不應計念」 tr. "teacher and disciple should be in accord, and should not take any evil thing to heart"—prajñā is like fire, which burns only with two conditions; hold fast to this one condition of accord, and in all the rest Māra can do nothing.

考據Apparatus

一、科判

本品在《大智度論》釋《大品般若》之次第中屬〈釋餘品〉一段,跨卷六十八、六十九。與前品〈魔事品第四十六〉同居一卷相接——品題「大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七」〔T25 0537a01〕居卷六十八之中(非卷首起題),前品訖處即本品起處;至卷六十八末題「大智度論卷第六十八」〔T25 0538b17〕,本品未竟,卷六十九以續題「大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七之餘」〔T25 0538b20〕重起,並重出造署譯署(「聖者龍樹造」「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」)——續題作「之餘」而非「之下」,與品四十、四十一、四十三、四十五「之餘」跨卷同型,如實誌錄。本品訖界為「略說魔事如是,廣說則無量無邊。然佛意但欲令行者成般若大事,是故師徒宜應和合,一切惡事,不應計念」段〔T25 0542b29〕迄,次品〈佛母品第四十八〉起於 0542c03——卷六十九於本品內不收卷,續攝次品之上(宋本卷題「訖第四十八品上」可證,見第四目),與品四十六、四十七跨卷六十八之情形結構相同。

全品純漢字七千五百二十(extract --check 工具值·本帳以此為優先參考值);依卷界析為兩單元,之上(卷六十八末段)、之下(卷六十九段)兩單元 YAML 自報欄分別作二千零二十四、五千五百一十五,其和七千五百三十九與工具值互差十九字——判為卷題/署記字元與計數口徑之差,與品三十八至四十五各帳一貫出現之同類差額同型,如實誌錄,非估算。兩單元之不均衡(約一比二點七)有品三十七之下前例,屬卷界切分之自然結果,此既定,不另議。

品內結構三【經】三【論】交替、依卷界析為兩單元。之上攝經①論①,範圍〔0537a01–0538b17〕:【經】〔T25 0537a02〕、【論】〔T25 0537b02〕。之下攝經②論②經③論③,範圍〔0538b18–0542c03 前〕:【經】〔T25 0538b25〕、【論】〔T25 0540a06〕、【經】〔T25 0541a09〕、【論】〔T25 0542a07〕。六標籤皆恰在塊首,無鑲嵌型過渡;切點繫卷界(跨卷依卷界),恰落論①與經②之間——卷界即經論界,無跨經論切分。

問答之數,本品頂層凡十組(兩單元正文回搜「問曰」「答曰」,之上三組〔0537b08/0537b15/0537b27〕、之下七組〔0540a06/0540a11/0540b04/0540b09/0540c21/0542a18/0542a22〕,皆位於論段之內)。說者結構:三段經文皆佛告須菩提之連續開示(「復次,須菩提」二十餘番相貫),經③內須菩提兩度白佛請問(惡魔作比丘形像何因緣〔0541a11〕、何等是魔事留難〔0541a28〕)、一度述佛喻而廣之(〔0541c06〕),佛逐一答可。義理兩軸循兩單元分:之上明師弟兩造不和合之初四對與十二頭陀之辨,之下廣列諸對偶、轉入惡魔化現四型,以閻浮提珍寶喻收束。

二、術語考

兩不和合·二心不和·魔事。 全品綱骨。品初第一對即立式:「聽法人欲書、持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、問義、正憶念;說法人懈墮,不欲為說。當知是為菩薩摩訶薩魔事」〔T25 0537a02〕,反向亦然——「二心不和,當知是為魔事」〔T25 0537a06〕。過不在一邊:兩造各有其善(一欲書、一欲說),只因不同心同事,書持之業不成,即是魔事。論總其因緣:「一切有為法,因緣和合故生,眾緣離則無」〔T25 0537b02〕——書寫般若亦是因緣生法,「內外因緣和合故生,所謂師、弟子同心同事故,乃得書成」〔T25 0537b04〕。內煩惱、外天子魔,皆離間此因緣:「內煩惱發、外天子魔作因緣,離是般若;菩薩應覺是魔事,防令不起。若自失,當具足;若弟子失,當教令得」〔T25 0537b18〕。

聽法人·說法人。 本品兩造之名。論嚴其實義:五蓋覆心而不欲說者,何以作師?「是人著世間樂,不觀空、無常,雖能心知、口說,不能自行」〔T25 0537b09〕——能知能說而不能行,仍是師,以「弟子雖必欲行而不能知,不能知故,更無餘處,必諮此人」〔T25 0537b11〕。聽而不能究竟成就者,何以名聽法者?「少多聽、受、讀、誦,不能究竟成就故,但名聽法」〔T25 0537b16〕——兩名皆從分上立,不從德上立,故兩造皆可為魔事之緣。

五善根·五蓋。 和合與不和合之心所底據。「聽法人信等五善根發故,欲書、持般若,乃至正憶念;說法者五蓋覆心故,不欲說」〔T25 0537b06〕;反之「弟子信等五善根鈍不發故,著世間樂故,不欲受書、持乃至正憶念」〔T25 0537b13〕。經文之下品對偶亦以此收:一人離貪欲、瞋恚、睡眠、掉悔、疑,一人不離,即不和合〔0539a23〕;論釋其機制:「一切眾生所行法,同則和合;一人離五蓋,一人不離,故相輕,相輕故不和合。一切上法皆爾」〔T25 0540b14〕——不和合之近因是「相輕」二字。

十二頭陀。 經①後半之目:「一、作阿蘭若,二、常乞食,三、納衣,四、一坐食,五、節量食,六、中後不飲漿,七、塚間住,八、樹下住,九、露地住,十、常坐不臥,十一、次第乞食,十二、但三衣」〔T25 0537a20〕。論先定其位:「佛所結戒,弟子受持。十二頭陀不名為戒,能行,則戒莊嚴;不能行,不犯戒」〔T25 0537b28〕——頭陀是行善非制戒,如布施「能行則得福,不能行者無罪」;故一人受一人不受,兩皆無罪,而兩不和合仍是魔事。次逐支釋因緣(阿蘭若至但三衣,見第三目),末總其宗:「是十二頭陀,佛意欲令弟子隨道行、捨世樂故,讚十二頭陀」〔T25 0538b08〕;「佛法唯以智慧為本,不以苦為先。是法皆助道、隨道故,諸佛常讚歎」〔T25 0538b14〕——並自繫古制:「於古四聖種中,頭陀即是三事」〔T25 0538b14〕。

十二部經次第義·誦經師·解義師。 之下對偶之一:「說法者知十二部經次第義,所謂修妬路乃至優波提舍;聽法者不知十二部經次第義」〔T25 0538c15〕。論以師之二型判之:「師鈍根者,是誦經師,非解義師」〔T25 0540a20〕,「十二部經,亦是誦經師」〔T25 0540a21〕——利鈍與知不知次第,皆歸誦與解之辨。

陀羅尼有種種。 一人得一人不得,何以為師?論分其類:「陀羅尼有種種。有弟子得聞持陀羅尼,能持、能誦,不能解義;師能為解說。弟子或能得諸法實相陀羅尼義,而不能次第讀誦;或師得聞持陀羅尼,未得大悲故,輕賤弟子,不能教導」〔T25 0540b05〕——聞持與實相兩陀羅尼互有長短,師弟各得其一而不相知,故不和合。

方便力。 六波羅蜜有無之外更立一重:「說法者於六波羅蜜有方便力,聽法人於六波羅蜜無方便力」〔T25 0539a06〕。論出其相:「弟子直信著善法。師不著法,以方便行六波羅蜜;弟子謂為不深樂六波羅蜜。何以知之?師或時讚歎六波羅蜜;或時斷人著故,破散六波羅蜜」〔T25 0540a29〕——有方便者讚亦得、破亦得,直信者見破即疑,兩不相知,遂成離隔。

相似法(似般若·似六波羅蜜·二乘經)。 經③立三重相似之魔:「似般若波羅蜜諸魔事起,似禪波羅蜜、似毘梨耶波羅蜜、似羼提波羅蜜、似尸羅波羅蜜、似檀波羅蜜魔事起,菩薩應當覺知,知已遠離」〔T25 0541a29〕;「聲聞、辟支佛所應行經,是菩薩摩訶薩應當知是魔事而遠離之」〔T25 0541b04〕。論訓「似」:「以著心行六波羅蜜,是名似」〔T25 0542a19〕;訓二乘經之為魔:「聲聞、辟支佛經,無有慈悲,不求佛道,但欲自度;雖是好事,破菩薩道,故名魔事」〔T25 0542a20〕——好事而破大道,即入魔數,此本品義理最峻處。

未受記菩薩墮疑。 惡魔作比丘形像之的:「是中破壞諸比丘時,有未受記菩薩便墮疑;墮疑故,不書深般若波羅蜜」〔T25 0541a16〕。論分利鈍:「鈍根菩薩信受是語,生邪見;若利根未得受記者生疑」〔T25 0542a11〕——邪見與疑兩病分繫兩根,皆離般若。

耗減薩婆若。 魔化佛身諸段之果語:「是菩薩貪著,貪著故,耗減薩婆若」〔T25 0541b12〕。論訓之以喻:「菩薩雖得少淨心,而失實相智慧;如人手捉重寶,有人以少金誑之,捨大價寶而取賤物,是名耗減」〔T25 0542a27〕——見佛身而心著,得小失大,故雖淨心亦是魔事(詳第三目天女喻、重寶喻)。

魔是欲界主。 論末答魔何獨能壞:「魔是欲界主,世間福德、智慧具足,魔是世間生死根本」〔T25 0542b18〕;色界諸天心柔軟不能破壞,無色界無形心細不能有所作,下諸天無力勢——「是魔先世業因緣力;又住處因緣,他作奪取,是中賊主名為魔。是魔相爾,破壞好事」〔T25 0542b23〕。

佛力·十方諸佛菩薩擁護。 收束之正面:「若善男子、善女人能書是深般若波羅蜜乃至正憶念時,魔事不起,能具足禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜,能具足四念處乃至一切種智。須菩提!當知佛力故」〔T25 0541c24〕;「十方現在無量無邊阿僧祇諸佛亦助是善男子、善女人」〔T25 0542a02〕,十方阿鞞跋致諸菩薩亦擁護祐助。論釋所以須護:「初發心菩薩福德、智慧薄故惜身,若十方諸佛菩薩不擁護佐助者,不能成」〔T25 0542b25〕(護而或不自覺,見第三目賊繞城喻)。

三、譬喻與故事

本品要喻分三層:論①攢燧一喻立因緣和合之宗,頭陀逐支釋內小喻連綴,論③收束處天女、重寶、賊繞城三喻與經文閻浮提珍寶喻相應。

攢燧求火喻(承「和合故生」義·全品之宗)。 「譬如攢燧求火,有鑽、有母,二事因緣得火;書寫般若乃至正憶念亦如是,內外因緣和合故生」〔T25 0537b03〕——鑽與母缺一不得火,師與弟子缺一不成書;本品二十餘對「兩不和合」皆此一喻之反面展開。

養馬養猪喻(承「一食」義)。 行者斷數數食:「佛法為行道故,不為益身,如養馬、養猪」〔T25 0537c23〕——食以支道,不以肥身,語峻而意明。

舍利弗五口六口(經引·承「節量食」義)。 「如經中舍利弗說:『我若食五口、六口,足之以水,則足支身。』」〔T25 0538a04〕論並繫此土之量:「於秦人中食,可十口許」〔T25 0538a05〕——羅什譯場以秦地食量換算之痕,如實誌錄。

馬轡勒喻(承「中後不飲漿」義)。 「如馬不著轡勒,左右噉草,不肯進路;若著轡勒,則不噉草意斷,隨人意去」〔T25 0538a08〕——過中飲漿之心如不勒之馬,求種種漿無厭則不能一心修善。

塚間九相·樹下四時·露地月光(頭陀支內三景)。 塚間住者:「因是屍觀,一切法中易得無常相、空相」〔T25 0538a13〕,見臭爛不淨易得九相觀,是離欲初門。樹下住者:「如佛生時、成道時、轉法輪時、般涅槃時,皆在樹下;行者隨諸佛法,常處樹下」〔T25 0538a18〕。露地住者:「月光遍照,空中明淨,心易入空三昧」〔T25 0538a26〕——三支各以一景繫一觀門。

五比丘納衣(本起故事·承「頭陀為本」義)。 「如轉法輪時,五比丘初得道,白佛言:『我等著何等衣?』佛言:『應著納衣。』」〔T25 0538b11〕又受戒法盡壽著納衣、乞食、樹下住、弊棄藥——論引佛世本制證頭陀之古。

天女迷悶喻(承「魔作佛身」義)。 小菩薩未應見佛身而魔作佛妙形,菩薩心著:「如未離欲人見天女形,深心染著,不能堪受天欲,迷悶而死。是故魔願得滿」〔T25 0542a25〕——所見愈妙,所失愈深。

重寶少金誑喻(承「耗減」義)。 「如人手捉重寶,有人以少金誑之,捨大價寶而取賤物,是名耗減」〔T25 0542a28〕——與天女喻同段相承,一明著相之危,一明貿失之實。

閻浮提珍寶喻(經喻·佛自說而須菩提廣之)。 「譬如閻浮提中珍寶:金、銀、琉璃、車𤦲、馬瑙、珊瑚等寶,多難多賊;如是,須菩提!善男子、善女人書是深般若波羅蜜乃至正憶念時,多賊、多留難起」〔T25 0541c03〕。論釋眾會之疑(般若妙法何以有人憎嫉):「般若波羅蜜是佛法藏中妙寶,微妙、甚深,懈怠鈍根者所不解,是故呰毀。魔以般若波羅蜜多令眾生入涅槃故,魔作怨賊」〔T25 0542b06〕——「如閻浮提金銀等,多怨多賊為是故出,不為瓦石等生」〔T25 0542b05〕,難之多正證寶之貴。

賊繞城喻(承『佛護不自覺』義·全品收筆)。 「是故諸佛、菩薩、諸天為破壞魔事,是菩薩或覺、或不覺;如賊繞城,大人守護,小兒不覺」〔T25 0542b27〕——初心菩薩在護中而不知護,恰與品初「菩薩應覺是魔事」相對成環:自覺其可覺,佛護其不能覺。

四、所釋經文

品題三注全帳(底本「兩不和合品」·宮本「兩過品」·聖聖乙石 -1 階續)。 品題〔T25 0537a01〕之注凡三,逐字全帳誌之。其一(0537001,總注一注六造相當)——底本(大正)作「大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七」;明本無此題;石本作「卷第六十九首」記;宮本作十四字「((大智度論釋第四十七品上兩過品))」——明立本品別名「兩過品」,與所釋經 T223 及吉藏疏 X24 之用名一致(見下)。所釋經 T223 目次「兩過品」題下另有夾注「丹兩不和合品」T08 0320b15 note 0320026——丹本於所釋經側逕用「兩不和合」之名,兩名系於兩本各自互見,適成交叉;聖本作十六字「((大智度論釋第四十六品上兩不和合品))」;聖乙本作十五字「((摩訶般若波羅蜜不和合品第四十六))」;石本又作二十一字「((摩訶般若波羅蜜品第四十六卷六十九兩不和合品))」——聖、聖乙、石三本皆作「第四十六」,較底本「第四十七」少一,與品四十四至四十六一貫之「聖/石 -1 階」模式完全延續無斷。此總注屬品題 note 層,工作底本 app 清單二百三十七條未含之(清單以 app 元素為準),故於本目與第八目專列全帳。其二(0537002)——「合」字元本作「含」。其三(0537003)——「七」字宋元作「七上」、明作「七之上」並帶夾註「經作兩不和合過品」——明本夾註合璧「兩不和合」+「過品」二稱為「兩不和合過品」,屬底本傳承層固有異名並陳現象,如實誌錄不判。判為「異名同品」:「兩不和合」系(底本+聖聖乙石題記)與「兩過」系(宮本+T223+X24 吉藏)兩造並錄,不判何本為正;本版品名從本論底本作「兩不和合品」(本版品名主軸為本論底本,既定之裁,本目不翻案)。

卷尾/卷首夾註(-1 階模式之續證)。 卷六十八末〔T25 0538b17〕「八」字夾註——宋宮作「八(釋第四十六品訖第四十七品上)」、元作「八(釋四十六品訖第四十七品之上)」、聖作「八(釋第四十五品訖四十六品上)」——聖本再度 -1(相對宋宮之「四十六訖四十七」,聖作「四十五訖四十六」),模式延續。卷六十九續題〔T25 0538b20〕一注五造——底本「大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七之餘(卷六十九)」;宋作「大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下訖第四十八品上」、元作「大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下(訖第四十八品之上)」、明作「大智度論卷第六十九釋兩不和合品第四十七之下」、宮作「大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下訖第四十八品上兩過品」(兼註「兩過品」三字)、聖作「大智度論釋第四十六品下(訖第四十七品上)六十九」——聖本 -1 持續;宋元宮三本著錄卷六十九收尾實跨品四十七、四十八之界(「訖第四十八品上」),與品四十六、四十七跨卷六十八之情形結構相同。又品末〔T25 0542c02〕「念」字注——聖乙、石作「念釋四十六品竟」,尾記式 -1 階,與品題 -1 一貫首尾相應。諸方各自來源、同向偏差,誌錄不判,機制不強解。

T223 mulu n 屬性重出異常(「兩過品」「佛母品」皆 n=48·XML 標記層異常如實誌)。 所釋經 T223 側 mulu 編碼層:本品對應 mulu 顯文作「47 兩過品」〔T08 0320b15 近〕,其 n 屬性標「48」——自品四十一以來屢見之 +1 偏移於此仍延續(品四十六「魔事品」n=47、本品 n=48,逐品 +1 連續);然次品 mulu 顯文「48 佛母品」〔T08 0323a22 近〕其 n 屬性亦標「48」——與本品重出、未依序遞增至 49。本帳獨立以規則掃描全文,n="48" 之品級 mulu 恰二條,逐條取原始上下文核實無誤。此為 CBETA T223 XML 本身 n 屬性標記重出,屬底本 XML 標記層瑕疵,非義理歧異,如實誌錄不強解;顯文品號序列本身連續無誤,對位以顯文與內容逐字比對為準。

全量牒經對讀(兩側對勘·開篇逐句核·對照組)。 本論經①開篇與所釋經〈兩過品〉逐字幾近同文——本論「復次,須菩提!聽法人欲書、持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、問義、正憶念;說法人懈墮,不欲為說。當知是為菩薩摩訶薩魔事」〔T25 0537a02〕;T223 同段作「復次,須菩提!聽法人欲書持般若波羅蜜、讀誦問義、正憶念;說法人懈惰不欲為說。當知是為菩薩魔事」〔T08 0320b16〕——同一佛告須菩提之發端、同一場景結構(誰欲書、誰不欲說、繫何果),文字幾全同,「懈墮/懈惰」字形之異與「菩薩摩訶薩/菩薩」之增略屬傳寫層差異。對照組:「惡魔作佛身金色丈光」「說法者受十二頭陀」「欲至他方豐樂之處」三串漢字流,於 T223 全經與 T1509 全論各唯一見(各一處、皆本品),對位唯一、無他品可淆,非拿甲本詞搜乙本之弱判。判為「異名同品」(品名兩造,品身逐字同文)。本論三【論】層為論體之結構性擴增,所釋經無此層,非異文。所釋經 T223 側於本品對讀範圍內之校勘 witness 逐條統計,本帳未展開(唯品題 mulu 二條與 K14 交叉引一條〔T08n0223_p0322a29,見第八目〕已逐字核),據實誌其未展開,俟後續考據補查,不以估值充數。

五、般若義眼

本品之眼,在把「魔事」從外相追進因緣裏——魔不必現形,兩個好人不同心,般若就寫不成。其義可約為五重。

其一,書寫般若亦是因緣生法。「一切有為法,因緣和合故生,眾緣離則無」〔T25 0537b02〕——攢燧求火,有鑽有母;般若之書成,繫於「師、弟子同心同事」。故本品不責一邊:說者聽者各有其善、各有其偏,偏偏相值即是離緣——離緣即魔事,不待魔來。

其二,無罪之處亦有魔事。十二頭陀「不名為戒,能行,則戒莊嚴;不能行,不犯戒」〔T25 0537b28〕——一人受一人不受,兩皆無罪;然「兩不和合,則是魔事」。魔事之判準不是罪福,是般若之成不成;此本品最細之一刀:善法與善法相值而不相下,其失與惡等。

其三,相輕是不和合之近因。「一人離五蓋,一人不離,故相輕,相輕故不和合。一切上法皆爾」〔T25 0540b15〕——凡所修上法,皆可轉為輕人之資;師以德輕弟子,弟子以直信輕方便,「相輕」二字收盡二十餘對之病根。

其四,好事可以是魔事。「聲聞、辟支佛經,無有慈悲,不求佛道,但欲自度;雖是好事,破菩薩道,故名魔事」〔T25 0542a20〕;乃至佛身現前,取相貪著,「一切煩惱、取相,皆是魔事」〔T25 0542a23〕——魔不以惡壞人,以似壞人、以好壞人;捨大價寶而取少金,是名耗減。

其五,珍寶多賊,佛護不覺。「如閻浮提金銀等,多怨多賊為是故出,不為瓦石等生」〔T25 0542b05〕——留難之多正證般若之貴。而護持自上而下:佛力故魔事不起,十方諸佛菩薩擁護祐助,「如賊繞城,大人守護,小兒不覺」〔T25 0542b28〕。品末一句收全品之正面:「佛意但欲令行者成般若大事,是故師徒宜應和合,一切惡事,不應計念」〔T25 0542c01〕——覺魔是防,和合是成;不計念惡事,是兩不和合品自己開出的藥。

六、諸家異釋

《大智度論》本無逐文全疏之傳統,古德引釋率屬據實偏倚。本品古德覆讀唯一家:釋所釋經之吉藏疏存完整專章;釋論之慧影疏於本品零覆蓋;均正書中無本品之引;天台兩系於本品品名及內容之回搜以負命題結案(見下)——本品之古德鏡照密度為本輯至此之最薄者,如實誌錄。此目誌錄其所疏所引與本品之對應,不判各家詮釋高下。

吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451)。 於所釋經〈兩過品〉之逐文疏,起〔X24n0451 0295a13〕(mulu「兩過品第四十七」,緊接品四十六〈魔事品〉疏訖處),迄〔X24n0451 0296b05〕前(次 mulu「佛母品第四十八」起處,本目依 mulu 連續序列判定),覆本品經全篇。其可誌者四。其一,品位總判——「第二、明兩過人共有魔事也。前既是魔事,為品亦爾」〔X24n0451 0295a14〕:吉藏以本品承前品魔事而立,前品獨過、本品兩過,其所據品名正是「兩過品」。其二,內外魔之科——「第一、多明內魔;第二、多明外魔。外魔之中形聲兩亂,內魔之中師與弟子」〔X24n0451 0295a21〕:以師弟不和為內魔、魔化形聲為外魔,並明「內魔中非無外魔成助,外魔之中非無內魔成資」之互資。其三,對偶之計數——「內外合說二十六雙,約次第而判者可為四倒」〔X24n0451 0295a24〕:吉藏自計本品對偶凡二十六雙,並科為十四雙師弟互不知、兩雙偏明師、五雙明弟子、五雙重明師——古德自有其計數與科分,本帳誌錄其數,不以本版段落切分強合之。其四,末段三科——「一、明留難;二、釋疑;三、佛力故難不能難也」〔X24n0451 0296a06〕:以留難、釋疑(珍寶喻答般若何以多難)、佛力三科收品末,與本品經③之敘全合。又 X24 疏於前品之文自用「兩不和合」一語——「或有所受更無能授,兩不和合,天魔事也」〔X24n0451 0294b06〕——「兩過」「兩不和合」二名皆見於吉藏筆下,如實誌錄。

慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791)·零覆蓋(如實誌)。 為釋本論之唯一古疏,僅殘卷存世。本品品名兩系(兩不和合品/兩過品)於 X46n0791 全檔回搜全數零命中;本品所繫論卷六十八、六十九不在殘卷覆蓋範圍——零覆蓋屬殘卷實況,非搜尋失誤,如實誌錄負結果。

均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784)·零命中(如實誌)。 品名兩系於 X46n0784 全檔回搜零命中,均正於本品無具名引。

天台兩系·負命題結案(專項查誌實)。 智顗《摩訶止觀》(T46n1911)、湛然《止觀輔行傳弘決》(T46n1912)、智顗《法華玄義》(T33n1716)、湛然《法華文句記》系之《法華玄義釋籤》(T33n1717)四部逐字回搜:「兩不和合」「兩過品」全數零命中。「十二頭陀」於 T46n1911 一見(0041c15)、T46n1912 三見(0165b11/0264b06/0267a22)、T33n1717 一見(0850b20)——逐條核其上下文,皆屬天台自身十二頭陀通義之獨立引述(釋禪波羅蜜等脈絡),未見逐字引用本品「一作阿蘭若……十二但三衣」列舉句式,亦未點名本品品題;「聽法人」「說法人」於 T46n1912 之數見,皆聽法說法功德之通泛勸讚語境,與本品『說聽兩造不和合=魔事』之對偶義理無涉——詞面雷同純屬名相共用,非引用關係,負命題結案:天台兩系對本品無可考之直接徵引。零命中亦是帳,不以他品之引例充填。

七、互讀與承衍

本品之義脈,前後相承者有五,皆此目所誌,不代定讀。

其一,魔事章之續(品四十六→四十七·硬鏈本論自身)。 前品〈魔事品〉明魔事起相,本品明說聽兩造不和合諸相——宮本品題徑名「兩過品」、吉藏科「前既是魔事,為品亦爾,今既兩過,前則獨過」(見第六目),兩品一章之勢,古德已見。校勘層亦留機械承續之痕:本品 star 重引注二十二條中三條之目標注落於品四十六範圍(〔T25 0533a06〕〔T25 0533c01〕〔T25 0536c06〕,見第八目)——同一異讀跨品共注,底本編碼層自證兩品相連。又論釋相似般若處自指前文:「如相似般若波羅蜜中說」〔T25 0542a19〕——品四十六相似般若章之品內前指,論主自成經緯。

其二,「如先答」之品內前指(論主自誌)。 論②兩度自指前答:「如先答:弟子見師有過故,不欲受法」〔T25 0540b11〕;「一人呵三惡道,一人讚歎諸天,是事如先答」〔T25 0540b17〕——後對偶之釋合併於前對偶,論體自省繁複,如實誌錄。

其三,頭陀與四聖種(本論自繫古制)。 「於古四聖種中,頭陀即是三事」〔T25 0538b14〕,又引轉法輪時五比丘納衣之制(見第三目)——論主以佛世古制證頭陀之所自,「佛法唯以智慧為本,不以苦為先」〔T25 0538b14〕一句立頭陀之限,為後世頭陀行義之論藏所本。

其四,後世徵引(天台一系零命中·如實誌)。 品名兩系於天台四部回搜全數零命中(詳第六目負命題結案);十二頭陀雖為天台文獻習用之目,皆通義獨立引述,非引本品。本品未見天台一系之具名引;然品四十六別有湛然《止觀輔行傳弘決》兩處明稱品題(「具如魔事品中說」〔T46 0406a16〕、「大品魔事品文」〔T46 0406b02〕·詳該品 apparatus 第三目),故不得概以「未見型」通括前品。又且並「十喻」型詞面命中亦無,古德覆讀唯吉藏一家——低見證密度品,如實分層誌錄。

其五,寶庫掛鏈(穩定徵引·軟引)。 本品『二心不和即魔事』之師資義、十二頭陀逐支因緣釋、「以著心行六波羅蜜,是名似」之相似法判、「一切煩惱、取相,皆是魔事」之取相義、閻浮提珍寶多賊之留難義,為般若護持行與師資相攝義之論藏所本,落穩定徵引〔T25n1509 兩不和合品·卷六十八–六十九〕;心經/金剛經/唯識諸帙引本論處尚未定稿,故軟引,俟其逐字核存。此屬般若義下貫諸經之承衍,誌錄不判。

八、校本與版本說明

本品底本為《大智度論》卷六十八至六十九〔T25 0537a01–0542c03〕(品身正文自品題〔T25 0537a01〕起,之上訖卷末題「大智度論卷第六十八」〔T25 0538b17〕,之下自續題「大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七之餘」〔T25 0538b20〕起,終於「略說魔事如是……不應計念」段〔T25 0542b29〕迄,次品起於 0542c03,卷六十九於本品內不收卷);所釋經校本為《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》〈兩過品〉〔T08 0320b15 起〕;古德疏校本為吉藏《大品經義疏》(X24n0451,覆本品〔X24n0451 0295a13–0296b05〕前);慧影《大智度論疏》(X46n0791)本品零覆蓋、均正《大乘四論玄義》(X46n0784)本品無引、天台兩系負命題結案(見第六目)。異讀校記依大正校勘,涉大正底本與宋、元、明、宮、聖、聖乙、石(石山寺本)諸本及麗藏(K)、CBETA 校之異。

witness 層(聖乙密集續存·低見證密度品之校勘反差)。 本品古德鏡照雖薄(見第六目),校勘 witness 反密:聖乙本續品四十五以來之大出,於本品校記凡百見上下,之下卷六十九尤密;石本諸見多與聖乙同組。品末〔T25 0542c02〕聖乙、石共出尾記式「念釋四十六品竟」-1 階標記(見第四目)。本品底本未見麗乙、南藏、北藏單見型條——與品四十五(各一二見)異,如實誌錄負結果。

CBETA 依麗藏校訂特殊型五條(lem 為 CBETA 校訂·專列)。 本品屬 CBETA 現代校勘層、依《高麗藏》(K14n0549)校訂之特殊型凡五條,逐字核底本,專列:其一〔T25 0537b19〕「離(K14n0549_p1176a13)(T07n0220_p0837b09)【CB】【麗-CB】|雖【大】|離【宮】【聖】」——帶《大般若》平行位交叉引之複合條;其二〔T25 0538a06〕「可(K14n0549_p1176c11)(T40n1804_p0130b16)【CB】【麗-CB】|不【大】|可【宮】【聖】【聖乙】|可不【石】」——帶道宣《四分律行事鈔》交叉引,本輯首見律部交叉引型;其三〔T25 0538a15〕「臭(K14n0549_p1176c21)【CB】【麗-CB】|嗅【大】」;其四〔T25 0538a22〕「著(K14n0549_p1177a06)【CB】【麗-CB】|者【大】|著【聖】」;其五〔T25 0541a17〕「墮(K14n0549_p1181a14)(T08n0223_p0322a29)【CB】【麗-CB】|隨【大】|隨【聖】」——帶所釋經 T223 對應位交叉引,且此條兼為 star 同錨共注(見下)。五條中三條帶第二重交叉引(cf2),其引號串於底本為 cf1 緊接 cf2 之連續拼接,如實誌錄其型;本版讀者面從 CBETA 現行文本讀法。

star 條二十二(跨品目標三條·專列誌型)。 本品 star-corresp 重引條(同一異讀於文中重複出現共用一注)凡二十二,隨條標明於下表;逐條核其 corresp 目標:十九條之目標落於本品範圍內(品內原生),三條之目標落於品四十六範圍——〔T25 0537a02〕【經】字注(目標 0533002=〔T25 0533a06〕注)、〔T25 0537b02〕【論】字注(目標 0533023=〔T25 0533c01〕注)、〔T25 0538a03〕穩字注(目標 0536016=〔T25 0536c06〕注)——與品四十五(四十七條全品內)異型、與品四十三(一條跨品)、品四十四(四條跨品)同型,如實誌錄。其大宗為「掉/挑」(聖乙石一貫作挑,四見連段)、「書/盡」(聖或聖乙屢作盡)、「深/〔缺〕」(宋元明宮慣行省「深」字)諸單字之逐處重出,皆無涉義理。

校勘總帳(二百三十七條全量對帳·底本原樣)。 下依工作底本原樣傳錄——本品校記合計二百三十七條 app,與工作底本 extract --check 工具值 app 237 機械相合。app 條依底本出現序全量列之,內含 star-corresp 重引二十二條(隨條標明目標注號與目標所在);CBETA 依麗藏校訂五條、品題卷題群組諸條隨條標記。品題總注(0537001 六造全帳)屬品題 note 層不在 app 清單之內,已於第四目專列。異本讀法並列保存,正文仍從現行底本讀法:

app 條(二百三十七·底本出現序·star-corresp 隨條標明)

  • 〔T25 0537a01〕合【大】|含【元】(品題注之二·元本「含」·見第四目)
  • 〔T25 0537a01〕七【大】|七上【宋】【元】|七之上(經作兩不和合過品)【明】(品題注之三·明本夾註「經作兩不和合過品」·見第四目)
  • 〔T25 0537a02〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖乙】(star·corresp→note(0533002)=跨品〔T25 0533a06〕品四十六注·跨品共用)
  • 〔T25 0537a04〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0537a06〕為【大】|菩薩【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537a14〕般【大】|持般【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b02〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖乙】(star·corresp→note(0533023)=跨品〔T25 0533c01〕品四十六注·跨品共用)
  • 〔T25 0537b03〕攢【大】|鑽【宋】【元】【明】【聖】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b03〕鑽【大】|錯【聖】|攢【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b07〕正【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b10〕知【大】|和【聖】
  • 〔T25 0537b11〕不能知【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0537b11〕更無餘處【大】|處無餘受【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b12〕諮【大】|證【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b12〕悲【大】|慈悲【聖】
  • 〔T25 0537b15〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0537004)=品內〔T25 0537a04〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0537b17〕同,能【大】|因緣【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b19〕因【大】|內【聖】
  • 〔T25 0537b19〕離(K14n0549_p1176a13)(T07n0220_p0837b09)【CB】【麗-CB】|雖【大】|離【宮】【聖】(CBETA 依麗藏校訂型·帶大般若平行位交叉引·見第八目專列)
  • 〔T25 0537b22〕土【大】|生【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b24〕追【大】|得追【聖】|追追【石】
  • 〔T25 0537b26〕皆【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c04〕而【大】|向【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c05〕蘭【大】|練【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c06〕最【大】|厭【聖】
  • 〔T25 0537c09〕德【大】|得【石】
  • 〔T25 0537c12〕責【大】|惰【宮】|㥽【石】
  • 〔T25 0537c12〕憂【大】|愛【明】
  • 〔T25 0537c13〕擯【大】|儐【宮】【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c13〕料【大】|斷【宮】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0537c14〕妨【大】|好【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c15〕常【大】|當【聖】
  • 〔T25 0537c16〕邪【大】|耶【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c20〕念【大】|命【石】
  • 〔T25 0537c21〕妨【大】|好【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a01〕廢【大】|癈【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a02〕量【大】|量食法【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a02〕所【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a03〕穩【大】|隱【宮】(star·corresp→note(0536016)=跨品〔T25 0536c06〕品四十六注·跨品共用)
  • 〔T25 0538a05〕之【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538a05〕中【大】|〔-〕【宮】【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a06〕可(K14n0549_p1176c11)(T40n1804_p0130b16)【CB】【麗-CB】|不【大】|可【宮】【聖】【聖乙】|可不【石】(CBETA 依麗藏校訂型·帶行事鈔交叉引·見第八目專列)
  • 〔T25 0538a06〕食【大】|貪【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a07〕心【大】|心生【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0538a08〕轡【大】|〔-〕【宮】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0538a09〕噉草【大】|嚴菓【聖】|嚴草【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a09〕路【大】|略【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a09〕轡【大】|變【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a09〕不【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0538a10〕噉草【大】|嚴草【聖乙】(star·corresp→note(0538010)=品內〔T25 0538a09〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0538a11〕門【大】|初門【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0538a12〕藉【大】|𧂐【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538a15〕臭(K14n0549_p1176c21)【CB】【麗-CB】|嗅【大】(CBETA 依麗藏校訂型·見第八目專列)
  • 〔T25 0538a15〕相【大】|想【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0538a16〕能作【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0538a17〕道【大】|著【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538a21〕蔭【大】|陰【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a22〕著(K14n0549_p1177a06)【CB】【麗-CB】|者【大】|著【聖】(CBETA 依麗藏校訂型·見第八目專列)
  • 〔T25 0538a23〕露【大】|路【石】
  • 〔T25 0538a24〕蟲【大】|虫【宋】【宮】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a26〕脫【大】|服【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538b03〕第【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538b04〕蓋【大】|善【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538b05〕但【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0538b05〕法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0538b10〕陀【大】|隨【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b12〕我【大】|或【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b13〕棄【大】|疾【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b14〕古【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b14〕是【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0538b16〕隨道【大】|道首【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b17〕八【大】|八(釋第四十六品訖第四十七品上)【宋】【宮】|八(釋四十六品訖第四十七品之上)【元】|八(釋第四十五品訖四十六品上)【聖】(卷六十八末夾註·宋宮元「釋第四十六品訖第四十七品上」系·聖-1階「釋第四十五品訖四十六品上」·見第四目)
  • 〔T25 0538b20〕大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七之餘(卷六十九)【大】|大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下訖第四十八品上【宋】|大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下(訖第四十八品之上)【元】|大智度論卷第六十九釋兩不和合品第四十七之下【明】|大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下訖第四十八品上兩過品【宮】|大智度論釋第四十六品下(訖第四十七品上)六十九【聖】(卷六十九續題一注五造·宋元「訖第四十八品上」·宮兼「兩過品」·聖-1階「第四十六品下」·見第四目)
  • 〔T25 0538b25〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538b25〕書【大】|令書【石】|令盡【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b27〕書【大】|盡【聖乙】(star·corresp→note(0538038)=品內〔T25 0538b25〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0538b28〕知【大】|智【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538c02〕慳【大】|堅【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538c07〕藥、資【大】|資藥【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538c08〕欲【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538c12〕闇【大】|闇人【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538c16〕優【大】|憂【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538c16〕聽【大】|故聽【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538c16〕知【大】|和【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538c18〕不【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539a12〕者【大】|人【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0539a17〕蜜【大】|蜜讀誦【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0539a19〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0539a22〕兩【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539a24〕掉【大】|挑【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0539a25〕掉【大】|挑【聖乙】【石】(star·corresp→note(0539005)=品內〔T25 0539a24〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0539a26〕掉【大】|挑【聖乙】【石】(star·corresp→note(0539005)=品內〔T25 0539a24〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0539a27〕掉【大】|挑【聖乙】【石】(star·corresp→note(0539005)=品內〔T25 0539a24〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0539b03〕書【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539b03〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0539b10〕生樂【大】|樂生【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0539b14〕苦,求阿耨多羅三藐三菩提為?』兩不和合,不【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0539b23〕書【大】|盡【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539b25〕聽【大】|聖【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0539b27〕書【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539b27〕念【大】|令【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539b29〕正【大】|心【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0539b29〕念【大】|令【聖】(star·corresp→note(0539013)=品內〔T25 0539b27〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0539c20〕少【大】|妙【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539c20〕兩【大】|〔-〕【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539c21〕是為【大】|言為【聖乙】|是言【石】
  • 〔T25 0539c21〕距【大】|拒【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0539c21〕我【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0539c24〕旃【大】|栴【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0539c25〕者【大】|者不【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539c25〕逐【大】|遂【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0539c29〕少【大】|妙【聖】(star·corresp→note(0539015)=品內〔T25 0539c20〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0540a02〕訊【大】|說【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540a06〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a14〕故【大】|故名【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a15〕師【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540a16〕或羞【大】|戒著【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a16〕似【大】|妙【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a19〕好【大】|如好【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a19〕波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540a20〕誦【大】|讀【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a21〕亦是【大】|是亦【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a21〕師【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0540a22〕罪【大】|羅【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a23〕事【大】|法事【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540a27〕不【大】|〔-〕【聖】|行不【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a28〕讀誦【大】|誦讀【石】
  • 〔T25 0540a29〕直【大】|真【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b02〕時【大】|有時【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b06〕解【大】|能【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b08〕讀誦【大】|誦讀【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0540b09〕導【大】|道【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b11〕欲【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b12〕受法【大】|受【宮】【聖乙】【石】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b13〕化【大】|導【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540b13〕或【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540b13〕邪【大】|耶【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b14〕行【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b16〕合【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b16〕切上法皆爾【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b16〕復次【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b17〕正【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b19〕都【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b19〕且【大】|但【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b20〕聚【大】|取【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b20〕多有【大】|有多【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540b21〕將【大】|持【聖】【聖乙】|侍【石】
  • 〔T25 0540b26〕止【大】|心【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b26〕法【大】|汝【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b26〕不聽,作是念:「何用是事?損我功德!」聽法者意【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b27〕謂【大】|諸【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540c01〕財【大】|則【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c01〕養【大】|故【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540c02〕則【大】|是則【石】
  • 〔T25 0540c02〕薄【大】|輕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c03〕經嶮【大】|逕險【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c06〕亦【大】|二【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c07〕羞【大】|著【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540c07〕任涉【大】|住法【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c08〕諳【大】|諸【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540c09〕稱【大】|講【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c09〕美【大】|義【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540c09〕時【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540c09〕慮【大】|惠【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c10〕謂【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540c10〕飲食【大】|欲食【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0540c13〕彼【大】|彼國【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540c13〕勿【大】|無【石】
  • 〔T25 0540c15〕好【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c18〕至【大】|去【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541a01〕護【大】|誰【石】
  • 〔T25 0541a02〕枉【大】|抂【聖】|往【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541a04〕樂著【大】|著樂【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541a10〕是【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541a10〕書【大】|盡【聖】(star·corresp→note(0539010)=品內〔T25 0539b23〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0541a17〕墮【大】|隨【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541a17〕墮(K14n0549_p1181a14)(T08n0223_p0322a29)【CB】【麗-CB】|隨【大】|隨【聖】(CBETA 依麗藏校訂型·帶所釋經交叉引·見第八目專列)(star·corresp→note(0541007)=品內〔T25 0541a17〕注·同錨共注)
  • 〔T25 0541a19〕不【大】|兩不【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541a19〕深【大】|成【宋】【元】【宮】【聖】|成深【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541a21〕作【大】|〔-〕【宮】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541a22〕際【大】|除【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541a23〕辟【大】|得辟【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541a23〕兩【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0541a25〕菩薩【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541b05〕而【大】|速【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541b05〕空【大】|空外空【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541b07〕用【大】|由【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541b09〕形【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0541b12〕貪著【大】|因緣【宋】【元】【明】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541b13〕減【大】|咸【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541b13〕婆【大】|波【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541b17〕從【大】|作【石】
  • 〔T25 0541b18〕多【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541b18〕乃至正憶念【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0541b24〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0539007)=品內〔T25 0539b03〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0541b26〕有【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541b27〕是【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0541006)=品內〔T25 0541a10〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0541c01〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0541c02〕受【大】|受持【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541c04〕寶【大】|〔-〕【宮】【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541c09〕書【大】|盡【聖】(star·corresp→note(0539010)=品內〔T25 0539b23〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0541c11〕人【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541c13〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0539007)=品內〔T25 0539b03〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0541c18〕新【大】|雜【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541c20〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0541c27〕是【大】|若【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541c29〕禪【大】|禪定【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542a06〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star·corresp→note(0539007)=品內〔T25 0539b03〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0542a07〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖乙】(star·corresp→note(0540002)=品內〔T25 0540a06〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0542a11〕邪【大】|耶【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542a12〕得【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542a12〕受【大】|授【明】
  • 〔T25 0542a14〕廣【大】|魔【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0542a15〕證【大】|不證【石】
  • 〔T25 0542a18〕似【大】|以【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542a18〕名【大】|多【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542a21〕雖【大】|離【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542a22〕信心【大】|心信【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0542a29〕價寶【大】|賈【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542a29〕減【大】|咸【聖】(star·corresp→note(0541020)=品內〔T25 0541b13〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0542b04〕憎【大】|壞【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b05〕賊【大】|賤【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b06〕瓦石【大】|在色【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b08〕呰【大】|訾【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b10〕呰【大】|訾【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】(star·corresp→note(0542014)=品內〔T25 0542b08〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0542b10〕壞【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542b11〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0542b12〕但【大】|恒【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b13〕三【大】|三寶【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0542b20〕邪【大】|耶【聖】【聖乙】(star·corresp→note(0542001)=品內〔T25 0542a11〕注·品內共用)
  • 〔T25 0542b20〕定【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0542b21〕軟【大】|濡【宮】【石】
  • 〔T25 0542b25〕初【大】|初心【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b26〕身【大】|身命【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b28〕繞【大】|嬈【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542b29〕然【大】|燃【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542c02〕念【大】|念釋四十六品竟【聖乙】【石】(聖乙石「念釋四十六品竟」·尾記式-1階·見第四目) 以上二百三十七條,與工作底本錨點校記之數機械相合;star 之目標已隨條標明(跨品三條已於上文專列)。品名/卷題攸關之數處(品題〔0537a01〕二注、卷六十八末〔0538b17〕、卷六十九續題〔0538b20〕、品末尾記〔0542c02〕)已於上文專列,並與所釋經、古德疏雙向對校(第四目、第六目)。

所釋經 witness 統計(未展開·誌闕待補)。 所釋經 T223 側於本品對讀範圍(〔T08 0320b15〕起至下品前)內之校勘 witness 逐條統計,本帳未展開(唯品題 mulu 層二條與 K14 條之 T223 交叉引位已逐字核,見第四目、本目),據實誌其未展開,俟後續考據補查,不以估值充數。

I. Structural Placement

Within the sequence in which the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa comments on the Larger Sūtra, this chapter belongs to the section of the Commentary on the Remaining Chapters, and spans Fascicles 68 and 69. It shares one fascicle with the preceding chapter, "The Deeds of Māra", Chapter 46, and follows directly on from it—the chapter title 「大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Two Discords, the Forty-seventh"〔T25 0537a01〕 stands in the middle of Fascicle 68 (it is not a title at the head of a fascicle), and the point where the preceding chapter ends is the point where this chapter begins; when the fascicle-end title 「大智度論卷第六十八」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Sixty-eight"〔T25 0538b17〕 is reached, this chapter is not yet finished, and Fascicle 69 begins it again with the continuation title 「大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七之餘」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Two Discords, the Forty-seventh, the remainder"〔T25 0538b20〕, repeating the signatures of author and translator (「聖者龍樹造」 tr. "Composed by the noble Nāgārjuna" and 「後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯」 tr. "Translated by Kumārajīva, Tripiṭaka master of Kucha, in the Later Qin")—the continuation title reads 「之餘」 tr. "the remainder" and not 「之下」 tr. "the last part", of the same type as the fascicle-crossing 「之餘」 tr. "the remainder" titles of Chapters 40, 41, 43, and 45; recorded as it is. The closing boundary of this chapter is the end of the passage 「略說魔事如是,廣說則無量無邊。然佛意但欲令行者成般若大事,是故師徒宜應和合,一切惡事,不應計念」 tr. "Thus the deeds of Māra are spoken of in brief; spoken of at length they are measureless and boundless. But the Buddha's intent is only that the practitioner accomplish the great matter of prajñā; therefore teacher and disciple should be in accord, and should not take any evil thing to heart"〔T25 0542b29〕; the next chapter, "The Mother of the Buddhas", Chapter 48, begins at 0542c03—Fascicle 69 does not close within this chapter but continues on to take in the first part of the next chapter (as the Song edition's fascicle title 「訖第四十八品上」 tr. "ending at the first part of the forty-eighth chapter" attests; see Section IV), structurally the same as the way Fascicle 68 spans Chapters 46 and 47.

The whole chapter has seven thousand five hundred and twenty pure Chinese characters (the tool value of extract --check; this apparatus takes it as the preferred reference value). Divided into two units at the fascicle boundary, the First Part (the final passage of Fascicle 68) and the Last Part (the passage in Fascicle 69) give, in the self-reported fields of their YAML, two thousand and twenty-four and five thousand five hundred and fifteen respectively; their sum, seven thousand five hundred and thirty-nine, differs from the tool value by nineteen characters—judged to be a difference in the characters of fascicle titles and signatures and in the method of counting, of the same type as the like differences that appear consistently in the apparatus of each of Chapters 38 to 45; recorded as it is, not an estimate. The imbalance between the two units (about one to two point seven) has a precedent in the Last Part of Chapter 37 and is a natural result of dividing at the fascicle boundary; this is settled and not discussed further.

Within the chapter the structure is three Sūtra 【經】 and three Treatise 【論】 sections in alternation, divided into two units at the fascicle boundary. The First Part takes in Sūtra ① and Treatise ①, range〔0537a01–0538b17〕: 【經】〔T25 0537a02〕, 【論】〔T25 0537b02〕. The Last Part takes in Sūtra ②, Treatise ②, Sūtra ③, and Treatise ③, range〔0538b18–0542c03 前〕 (that is, up to just before the second point): 【經】〔T25 0538b25〕, 【論】〔T25 0540a06〕, 【經】〔T25 0541a09〕, 【論】〔T25 0542a07〕. All six tags fall exactly at the head of their blocks, with no transition of the embedded type; the cut point is tied to the fascicle boundary (where a chapter crosses fascicles, it is divided at the fascicle boundary), and falls exactly between Treatise ① and Sūtra ②—the fascicle boundary is the boundary between sūtra and treatise, and no division cuts across a sūtra or treatise section.

As to the number of questions and answers: at the top level this chapter has ten groups in all (searching back through the main text of both units for 「問曰」 tr. "Question" and 「答曰」 tr. "Answer": three groups in the First Part〔0537b08/0537b15/0537b27〕 and seven in the Last Part〔0540a06/0540a11/0540b04/0540b09/0540c21/0542a18/0542a22〕, all located within treatise sections). The structure of speakers: all three sūtra sections are the Buddha's continuous instruction to Subhūti (more than twenty rounds linked by 「復次,須菩提」 tr. "Again, Subhūti!"); within Sūtra ③ Subhūti twice addresses the Buddha with a request (for what reason the evil Māra takes the form of a bhikṣu〔0541a11〕, and what the deeds of Māra that hinder are〔0541a28〕), and once restates the Buddha's simile and broadens it (〔0541c06〕), and the Buddha answers and assents to each in turn. The two doctrinal axes follow the division into two units: the First Part makes clear the first four pairs of the discord of the two parties, teacher and disciple, and the distinction concerning the twelve dhūta practices; the Last Part lists the pairs broadly, turns to the four types of the evil Māra's apparitions, and closes with the simile of the precious things of Jambudvīpa.

II. Terms Examined

The two discords · the two minds not in accord · the deeds of Māra. The backbone of the whole chapter. The very first pair at the opening of the chapter sets the pattern: 「聽法人欲書、持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、問義、正憶念;說法人懈墮,不欲為說。當知是為菩薩摩訶薩魔事」 tr. "The hearer of the Dharma wishes to write out and uphold prajñāpāramitā, to read, recite, ask the meaning, and rightly recollect it; the speaker of the Dharma is slack and does not wish to speak it for him. Know that this is a deed of Māra for the bodhisattva-mahāsattva"〔T25 0537a02〕, and the reverse is likewise—「二心不和,當知是為魔事」 tr. "the two minds are not in accord; know that this is a deed of Māra"〔T25 0537a06〕. The fault does not lie on one side: each of the two parties has its own good (one wishes to write out, one wishes to speak); only because they are not of one mind and one undertaking, the work of writing out and upholding is not accomplished—and that is a deed of Māra. The treatise sums up the causes and conditions: 「一切有為法,因緣和合故生,眾緣離則無」 tr. "Every conditioned dharma arises because causes and conditions come together; when the conditions part, it is not"〔T25 0537b02〕—writing out prajñā too is a dharma born of causes and conditions: 「內外因緣和合故生,所謂師、弟子同心同事故,乃得書成」 tr. "it arises because inner and outer causes and conditions come together; that is, only because teacher and disciple are of one mind and one undertaking can the writing out be completed"〔T25 0537b04〕. The inner afflictions and the outer Māra who is a son of the gods both drive this set of causes and conditions apart: 「內煩惱發、外天子魔作因緣,離是般若;菩薩應覺是魔事,防令不起。若自失,當具足;若弟子失,當教令得」 tr. "The inner afflictions arise and the outer Māra who is a son of the gods makes causes and conditions, separating one from this prajñā; the bodhisattva should be aware of these deeds of Māra and guard against them so that they do not arise. If the lack is his own, he should make it complete; if the lack is the disciple's, he should teach him so that he obtains it"〔T25 0537b18〕.

The hearer of the Dharma · the speaker of the Dharma. The names of the two parties in this chapter. The treatise is strict about what they really mean: one whose mind is covered by the five hindrances and who does not wish to speak—how can he act as teacher? 「是人著世間樂,不觀空、無常,雖能心知、口說,不能自行」 tr. "This person is attached to worldly pleasure and does not contemplate emptiness and impermanence; although he can know it in his mind and speak it with his mouth, he cannot practise it himself"〔T25 0537b09〕—able to know and to speak but unable to practise, he is still a teacher, because 「弟子雖必欲行而不能知,不能知故,更無餘處,必諮此人」 tr. "although the disciple is set on practising, he cannot know; because he cannot know, there is nowhere else to go, and he must consult this person"〔T25 0537b11〕. One who hears but cannot bring it to final accomplishment—why is he called one who hears the Dharma? 「少多聽、受、讀、誦,不能究竟成就故,但名聽法」 tr. "He hears, receives, reads, and recites a little or a lot; because he cannot bring it to final accomplishment, he is only called one who hears the Dharma"〔T25 0537b16〕—both names are established from the role, not from virtue, and therefore both parties can be conditions for a deed of Māra.

The five wholesome roots · the five hindrances. The mental basis of accord and discord. 「聽法人信等五善根發故,欲書、持般若,乃至正憶念;說法者五蓋覆心故,不欲說」 tr. "Because the five wholesome roots of the hearer of the Dharma, faith and the rest, have arisen, he wishes to write out and uphold prajñā, and so on up to rightly recollecting it; because the mind of the speaker of the Dharma is covered by the five hindrances, he does not wish to speak"〔T25 0537b06〕; conversely, 「弟子信等五善根鈍不發故,著世間樂故,不欲受書、持乃至正憶念」 tr. "because the disciple's five wholesome roots, faith and the rest, are dull and have not arisen, and because he is attached to worldly pleasure, he does not wish to receive, write out, uphold, and so on up to rightly recollect"〔T25 0537b13〕. The pairs of the sūtra text in the Last Part are also gathered up by this: one person has parted from desire, ill will, sloth and torpor, restlessness and remorse, and doubt, and one has not, and so they are not in accord〔0539a23〕; the treatise explains the mechanism: 「一切眾生所行法,同則和合;一人離五蓋,一人不離,故相輕,相輕故不和合。一切上法皆爾」 tr. "Among all the dharmas that beings practise, where they are the same there is accord; one person has left the five hindrances and one has not, and so they belittle each other, and because they belittle each other they are not in accord. All the higher dharmas are like this"〔T25 0540b14〕—the proximate cause of discord is the two Chinese characters 「相輕」 tr. "belittle each other".

The twelve dhūta practices. The list in the second half of Sūtra ①: 「一、作阿蘭若,二、常乞食,三、納衣,四、一坐食,五、節量食,六、中後不飲漿,七、塚間住,八、樹下住,九、露地住,十、常坐不臥,十一、次第乞食,十二、但三衣」 tr. "First, dwelling in the araṇya; second, always begging for food; third, wearing robes of cast-off rags; fourth, eating at one sitting; fifth, eating in measured quantity; sixth, not drinking juices after midday; seventh, dwelling among the tombs; eighth, dwelling under a tree; ninth, dwelling in the open; tenth, always sitting, never lying down; eleventh, begging from house to house in order; twelfth, keeping only the three robes"〔T25 0537a20〕. The treatise first fixes their place: 「佛所結戒,弟子受持。十二頭陀不名為戒,能行,則戒莊嚴;不能行,不犯戒」 tr. "What the Buddha lays down as precepts, the disciples receive and uphold. The twelve dhūta practices are not called precepts; if one can practise them, the precepts are adorned; if one cannot practise them, one does not break the precepts"〔T25 0537b28〕—the dhūta practices are the doing of good, not the laying down of precepts; they are like giving, where 「能行則得福,不能行者無罪」 tr. "one who can practise it obtains merit, and one who cannot practise it has no offence"; therefore when one person takes them up and the other does not, neither has an offence, and yet the two not being in accord is still a deed of Māra. Next it explains the causes and conditions practice by practice (from the araṇya to keeping only the three robes; see Section III), and at the end sums up their purport: 「是十二頭陀,佛意欲令弟子隨道行、捨世樂故,讚十二頭陀」 tr. "As for these twelve dhūta practices, it is because the Buddha's intent is to have his disciples practise in accordance with the path and give up worldly pleasure that he praises the twelve dhūta practices"〔T25 0538b08〕; 「佛法唯以智慧為本,不以苦為先。是法皆助道、隨道故,諸佛常讚歎」 tr. "The Buddha's Dharma takes wisdom alone as its root; it does not put suffering first. Because these dharmas all assist the path and accord with the path, the buddhas always praise them"〔T25 0538b14〕—and it ties them to the ancient rule itself: 「於古四聖種中,頭陀即是三事」 tr. "Among the ancient four noble lineages, the dhūta practices are three of the matters"〔T25 0538b14〕.

The order and meaning of the twelve divisions of the scriptures · the teacher who recites the sūtras · the teacher who explains the meaning. One of the pairs of the Last Part: 「說法者知十二部經次第義,所謂修妬路乃至優波提舍;聽法者不知十二部經次第義」 tr. "The speaker of the Dharma knows the order and meaning of the twelve divisions of the scriptures, namely sūtra and so on up to upadeśa; the hearer of the Dharma does not know the order and meaning of the twelve divisions of the scriptures"〔T25 0538c15〕. The treatise judges it by two types of teacher: 「師鈍根者,是誦經師,非解義師」 tr. "A teacher of dull faculties is a teacher who recites the sūtras, not a teacher who explains the meaning"〔T25 0540a20〕, and 「十二部經,亦是誦經師」 tr. "as for the twelve divisions of the scriptures, this too is a teacher who recites the sūtras"〔T25 0540a21〕—keenness and dullness, and knowing or not knowing the order, both come back to the distinction between reciting and explaining.

There are many kinds of dhāraṇī. One person obtains it and the other does not—how then can he be a teacher? The treatise distinguishes the kinds: 「陀羅尼有種種。有弟子得聞持陀羅尼,能持、能誦,不能解義;師能為解說。弟子或能得諸法實相陀羅尼義,而不能次第讀誦;或師得聞持陀羅尼,未得大悲故,輕賤弟子,不能教導」 tr. "There are many kinds of dhāraṇī. There is the disciple who has obtained the dhāraṇī of hearing and retaining, who can retain and can recite but cannot explain the meaning; the teacher can explain it for him. Or the disciple may be able to obtain the meaning of the dhāraṇī of the real mark of all dharmas, yet be unable to read and recite in order; or the teacher has obtained the dhāraṇī of hearing and retaining but, because he has not yet obtained great compassion, slights and despises the disciple and cannot teach and guide him"〔T25 0540b05〕—the two dhāraṇī, of hearing and retaining and of the real mark, each have their strengths and shortcomings; teacher and disciple each obtain one of them and do not understand each other, and so they are not in accord.

The power of skilful means. Beyond having or not having the six perfections, one further layer is set up: 「說法者於六波羅蜜有方便力,聽法人於六波羅蜜無方便力」 tr. "The speaker of the Dharma has the power of skilful means in the six perfections; the hearer of the Dharma has no power of skilful means in the six perfections"〔T25 0539a06〕. The treatise brings out its marks: 「弟子直信著善法。師不著法,以方便行六波羅蜜;弟子謂為不深樂六波羅蜜。何以知之?師或時讚歎六波羅蜜;或時斷人著故,破散六波羅蜜」 tr. "The disciple simply believes in and clings to wholesome dharmas. The teacher does not cling to dharmas and practises the six perfections with skilful means; the disciple takes him not to delight deeply in the six perfections. How does he come to think so? At times the teacher praises the six perfections; at times, to cut off people's clinging, he breaks up and scatters the six perfections"〔T25 0540a29〕—one who has skilful means may praise and may equally break up; one who simply believes, on seeing them broken up, at once doubts; the two do not understand each other, and so they drift apart.

Semblance dharmas (the semblance of prajñā · the semblance of the six perfections · the sūtras of the two vehicles). Sūtra ③ sets up Māra in three levels of semblance: 「似般若波羅蜜諸魔事起,似禪波羅蜜、似毘梨耶波羅蜜、似羼提波羅蜜、似尸羅波羅蜜、似檀波羅蜜魔事起,菩薩應當覺知,知已遠離」 tr. "Deeds of Māra arise that are a semblance of prajñāpāramitā; deeds of Māra arise that are a semblance of dhyānapāramitā, a semblance of vīryapāramitā, a semblance of kṣāntipāramitā, a semblance of śīlapāramitā, a semblance of dānapāramitā; the bodhisattva should be aware of them, and having known them, keep far from them"〔T25 0541a29〕; 「聲聞、辟支佛所應行經,是菩薩摩訶薩應當知是魔事而遠離之」 tr. "The sūtras that śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas should practise—the bodhisattva-mahāsattva should know these as deeds of Māra and keep far from them"〔T25 0541b04〕. The treatise glosses 「似」 tr. "semblance": 「以著心行六波羅蜜,是名似」 tr. "To practise the six perfections with a clinging mind is called the semblance"〔T25 0542a19〕; and glosses why the sūtras of the two vehicles are Māra: 「聲聞、辟支佛經,無有慈悲,不求佛道,但欲自度;雖是好事,破菩薩道,故名魔事」 tr. "The sūtras of the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas have no kindness and compassion; they do not seek the path of the Buddha but wish only to deliver themselves; though they are good things, they break the bodhisattva path, and so are called deeds of Māra"〔T25 0542a20〕—a good thing that breaks the great path enters the ranks of Māra; this is the steepest point of the chapter's doctrine.

A bodhisattva who has not received the prediction falls into doubt. The target of the evil Māra who takes the form of a bhikṣu: 「是中破壞諸比丘時,有未受記菩薩便墮疑;墮疑故,不書深般若波羅蜜」 tr. "When in this way he breaks down the bhikṣus, a bodhisattva who has not received the prediction falls into doubt; because he falls into doubt, he does not write out the deep prajñāpāramitā"〔T25 0541a16〕. The treatise distinguishes keen and dull: 「鈍根菩薩信受是語,生邪見;若利根未得受記者生疑」 tr. "A bodhisattva of dull faculties believes and accepts these words and gives rise to wrong views; one of keen faculties who has not yet received the prediction gives rise to doubt"〔T25 0542a11〕—the two sicknesses, wrong view and doubt, are tied to the two kinds of faculties, and both depart from prajñā.

The diminishment of sarvajñā. The concluding words of the passages on Māra making the body of a Buddha: 「是菩薩貪著,貪著故,耗減薩婆若」 tr. "This bodhisattva craves and clings to it, and because of craving and clinging, sarvajñā is diminished"〔T25 0541b12〕. The treatise glosses it with a simile: 「菩薩雖得少淨心,而失實相智慧;如人手捉重寶,有人以少金誑之,捨大價寶而取賤物,是名耗減」 tr. "Although the bodhisattva obtains a little pure mind, he loses the wisdom of the real mark; like a person holding a heavy treasure in his hand, whom someone deceives with a little gold, so that he lets go the treasure of great price and takes the cheap thing—this is called diminishment"〔T25 0542a27〕—seeing the body of a Buddha, the mind clings, gaining the small and losing the great; therefore even a pure mind is a deed of Māra (see in detail the simile of the heavenly maiden and the simile of the heavy treasure in Section III).

Māra is the lord of the desire realm. At the end of the treatise, answering why Māra alone can do such harm: 「魔是欲界主,世間福德、智慧具足,魔是世間生死根本」 tr. "Māra is the lord of the desire realm, complete in worldly merit and wisdom; Māra is the root of birth and death in the world"〔T25 0542b18〕; the gods of the form realm have soft minds and cannot break and ruin, those of the formless realm have no form and subtle minds and can do nothing, and the lower gods have no power or might—「是魔先世業因緣力;又住處因緣,他作奪取,是中賊主名為魔。是魔相爾,破壞好事」 tr. "This is the power of Māra's causes and conditions of karma from former lives; further, by the causes and conditions of his dwelling-place, he seizes what others have made, and the chief of the thieves in it is called Māra. Such is the mark of Māra: he breaks and ruins good things"〔T25 0542b23〕.

The Buddha's power · the protection of the buddhas and bodhisattvas of the ten directions. The positive side of the close: 「若善男子、善女人能書是深般若波羅蜜乃至正憶念時,魔事不起,能具足禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜,能具足四念處乃至一切種智。須菩提!當知佛力故」 tr. "If, when good men and good women can write out this deep prajñāpāramitā, and so on up to rightly recollecting it, the deeds of Māra do not arise, and they can fulfil dhyānapāramitā and so on up to dānapāramitā, and can fulfil the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to omniscience of all kinds—Subhūti! know that it is by the Buddha's power"〔T25 0541c24〕; 「十方現在無量無邊阿僧祇諸佛亦助是善男子、善女人」 tr. "The measureless, boundless, asaṃkhyeya buddhas now present in the ten directions also help these good men and good women"〔T25 0542a02〕, and the avaivartika bodhisattvas of the ten directions also guard, protect, and assist them. The treatise explains why protection is needed: 「初發心菩薩福德、智慧薄故惜身,若十方諸佛菩薩不擁護佐助者,不能成」 tr. "Because the merit and wisdom of the bodhisattva who has newly aroused the mind are thin, he cherishes his body; if the buddhas and bodhisattvas of the ten directions did not guard, protect, and assist him, he could not accomplish it"〔T25 0542b25〕 (on being protected and perhaps not aware of it, see the simile of thieves surrounding a city in Section III).

III. Similes and Stories

The key similes of this chapter fall into three layers: in Treatise ① the one simile of the fire-drill sets up the principle of coming together through causes and conditions; small similes within the practice-by-practice explanation of the dhūta practices are strung together; and at the close of Treatise ③ the three similes of the heavenly maiden, the heavy treasure, and thieves surrounding a city correspond to the sūtra's simile of the precious things of Jambudvīpa.

The simile of seeking fire with a fire-drill (carrying on the meaning of 「和合故生」 tr. "arises because they come together" · the principle of the whole chapter). 「譬如攢燧求火,有鑽、有母,二事因緣得火;書寫般若乃至正憶念亦如是,內外因緣和合故生」 tr. "It is like seeking fire with a fire-drill: there is the drill and there is the base, and by the causes and conditions of the two things the fire is got; writing out prajñā, and so on up to rightly recollecting it, is likewise: it arises because inner and outer causes and conditions come together"〔T25 0537b03〕—lacking either the drill or the base one does not get fire, and lacking either teacher or disciple the writing out is not accomplished; the more than twenty pairs of 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two discords" in this chapter are all the unfolding of the reverse side of this one simile.

The simile of feeding a horse and feeding a pig (carrying on the meaning of 「一食」 tr. "one meal"). The practitioner cuts off eating again and again: 「佛法為行道故,不為益身,如養馬、養猪」 tr. "The Buddha's Dharma is for the sake of practising the path, not for the benefit of the body, as one feeds a horse or feeds a pig"〔T25 0537c23〕—food is to support the path, not to fatten the body; the words are severe and the meaning is clear.

Śāriputra's five or six mouthfuls (cited from a sūtra · carrying on the meaning of 「節量食」 tr. "eating in measured quantity"). 「如經中舍利弗說:『我若食五口、六口,足之以水,則足支身。』」 tr. "As Śāriputra says in a sūtra: ‘If I eat five or six mouthfuls and fill up with water, that is enough to support the body.’"〔T25 0538a04〕 The treatise also ties it to the measure of this land: 「於秦人中食,可十口許」 tr. "Among the people of Qin, the meal would be about ten mouthfuls"〔T25 0538a05〕—a trace of Kumārajīva's translation assembly converting to the measure of food in the land of Qin; recorded as it is.

The simile of the horse's bridle (carrying on the meaning of 「中後不飲漿」 tr. "not drinking juices after midday"). 「如馬不著轡勒,左右噉草,不肯進路;若著轡勒,則不噉草意斷,隨人意去」 tr. "Like a horse without a bridle, which eats grass to left and right and will not go forward on the road; if it is fitted with the bridle, the intent to eat grass is cut off, and it goes as the rider wishes"〔T25 0538a08〕—the mind that drinks juices after midday is like an unbridled horse; seeking all kinds of juices without satiety, it cannot single-mindedly cultivate the good.

The nine marks among the tombs · the four occasions under a tree · moonlight in the open (three scenes within the dhūta practices). Of dwelling among the tombs: 「因是屍觀,一切法中易得無常相、空相」 tr. "Through this contemplation of corpses, one easily obtains the mark of impermanence and the mark of emptiness in all dharmas"〔T25 0538a13〕; seeing the stinking, rotting impurity, one easily obtains the contemplation of the nine marks, the first gate of leaving desire. Of dwelling under a tree: 「如佛生時、成道時、轉法輪時、般涅槃時,皆在樹下;行者隨諸佛法,常處樹下」 tr. "As when the Buddha was born, when he attained the path, when he turned the wheel of the Dharma, and when he entered parinirvāṇa, all under a tree; the practitioner follows the Dharma of the buddhas and always stays under a tree"〔T25 0538a18〕. Of dwelling in the open: 「月光遍照,空中明淨,心易入空三昧」 tr. "The moonlight shines everywhere, the sky is bright and clear, and the mind easily enters the emptiness samādhi"〔T25 0538a26〕—each of the three practices ties one scene to one gate of contemplation.

The five bhikṣus and the robes of rags (an origin story · carrying on the meaning of 「頭陀為本」 tr. "the dhūta practices as the root"). 「如轉法輪時,五比丘初得道,白佛言:『我等著何等衣?』佛言:『應著納衣。』」 tr. "As when the wheel of the Dharma was turned, the five bhikṣus, having first attained the path, said to the Buddha: ‘What robes should we wear?’ The Buddha said: ‘You should wear robes of cast-off rags.’"〔T25 0538b11〕 Further, in the procedure of receiving the precepts, one wears robes of cast-off rags, begs for food, dwells under a tree, and uses discarded medicine for the whole of one's life—the treatise cites the original rules of the Buddha's own time to prove the antiquity of the dhūta practices.

The simile of the heavenly maiden and the swoon (carrying on the meaning of 「魔作佛身」 tr. "Māra makes the body of a Buddha"). A small bodhisattva ought not yet to see the body of a Buddha, and Māra makes the wondrous form of a Buddha; the bodhisattva's mind clings: 「如未離欲人見天女形,深心染著,不能堪受天欲,迷悶而死。是故魔願得滿」 tr. "Like a person not yet free of desire who sees the form of a heavenly maiden, is deeply stained with attachment, cannot bear to receive the pleasures of heaven, and dies in a swoon. Therefore Māra's wish is fulfilled"〔T25 0542a25〕—the more wondrous what is seen, the deeper what is lost.

The simile of the heavy treasure and the deceit of a little gold (carrying on the meaning of 「耗減」 tr. "diminishment"). 「如人手捉重寶,有人以少金誑之,捨大價寶而取賤物,是名耗減」 tr. "Like a person holding a heavy treasure in his hand, whom someone deceives with a little gold, so that he lets go the treasure of great price and takes the cheap thing—this is called diminishment"〔T25 0542a28〕—it follows on from the simile of the heavenly maiden in the same passage: the one makes clear the danger of attaching to marks, the other the reality of the bad exchange.

The simile of the precious things of Jambudvīpa (a sūtra simile · spoken by the Buddha himself and broadened by Subhūti). 「譬如閻浮提中珍寶:金、銀、琉璃、車𤦲、馬瑙、珊瑚等寶,多難多賊;如是,須菩提!善男子、善女人書是深般若波羅蜜乃至正憶念時,多賊、多留難起」 tr. "It is like the precious things of Jambudvīpa—gold, silver, beryl, giant clam, agate, coral and such treasures—which have many difficulties and many thieves; just so, Subhūti! when good men and good women write out this deep prajñāpāramitā, and so on up to rightly recollecting it, many thieves and many hindrances arise"〔T25 0541c03〕. The treatise explains the doubt of the assembly (why anyone should hate and envy the wondrous Dharma of prajñā): 「般若波羅蜜是佛法藏中妙寶,微妙、甚深,懈怠鈍根者所不解,是故呰毀。魔以般若波羅蜜多令眾生入涅槃故,魔作怨賊」 tr. "Prajñāpāramitā is the wondrous treasure in the storehouse of the Buddha's Dharma, subtle and very deep; those who are lazy and of dull faculties do not understand it, and therefore they disparage it. Because prajñāpāramitā leads many beings into nirvāṇa, Māra makes himself an enemy and a thief"〔T25 0542b06〕—「如閻浮提金銀等,多怨多賊為是故出,不為瓦石等生」 tr. "Like the gold, silver, and the rest of Jambudvīpa: the many enemies and many thieves come out for their sake; they do not arise for tiles and stones and the like"〔T25 0542b05〕; the many difficulties are exactly the proof that the treasure is precious.

The simile of thieves surrounding a city (carrying on the meaning ‘the Buddha's protection goes unnoticed’ · the closing stroke of the whole chapter). 「是故諸佛、菩薩、諸天為破壞魔事,是菩薩或覺、或不覺;如賊繞城,大人守護,小兒不覺」 tr. "Therefore the buddhas, the bodhisattvas, and the gods break and ruin the deeds of Māra for him, and this bodhisattva is either aware of it or not aware of it; as when thieves surround a city, the grown men keep guard and the small children do not notice"〔T25 0542b27〕—the beginner bodhisattva is inside the protection and does not know he is protected; this forms a ring with 「菩薩應覺是魔事」 tr. "the bodhisattva should be aware of these deeds of Māra" at the opening of the chapter: he is to be aware of what he can be aware of, and the Buddha protects what he cannot be aware of.

IV. The Sūtra Passage Explained

The full ledger of the three notes on the chapter title (the base text 「兩不和合品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Discords" · the Palace edition 「兩過品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Faults" · the -1 step of the Shōgozō, the Shōgozō B, and the Ishiyama continuing). The notes on the chapter title〔T25 0537a01〕 number three, and their full ledger is recorded here word for word. The first (0537001; a general note, one note made in six forms)—the base text (Taishō) reads 「大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Two Discords, the Forty-seventh"; the Ming edition lacks this title; the Ishiyama text has the record 「卷第六十九首」 tr. "head of Fascicle Sixty-nine"; the Palace edition reads, in fourteen characters, 「((大智度論釋第四十七品上兩過品))」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, commentary on the forty-seventh chapter, first part, Chapter on the Two Faults"—it clearly sets up the alternative name of this chapter, 「兩過品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Faults", agreeing with the name used in the sūtra explained, T223, and in Jizang's commentary, X24 (see below). Under the title 「兩過品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Faults" in the table of contents of the sūtra explained, T223, there is a separate interlinear note, 「丹兩不和合品」 tr. "Khitan edition: Chapter on the Two Discords" T08 0320b15 note 0320026—the Khitan edition uses the name 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two discords" outright on the side of the sūtra explained; the two names each appear in the other's text, and so cross exactly; the Shōgozō reads, in sixteen characters, 「((大智度論釋第四十六品上兩不和合品))」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, commentary on the forty-sixth chapter, first part, Chapter on the Two Discords"; the Shōgozō B reads, in fifteen characters, 「((摩訶般若波羅蜜不和合品第四十六))」 tr. "Chapter on Mahāprajñāpāramitā, Not in Accord, the Forty-sixth"; the Ishiyama text further reads, in twenty-one characters, 「((摩訶般若波羅蜜品第四十六卷六十九兩不和合品))」 tr. "Chapter on Mahāprajñāpāramitā, the Forty-sixth, Fascicle Sixty-nine, Chapter on the Two Discords"—the three texts, the Shōgozō, the Shōgozō B, and the Ishiyama, all read 「第四十六」 tr. "the Forty-sixth", one less than the base text's 「第四十七」 tr. "the Forty-seventh", continuing entirely without break the pattern 「聖/石 -1 階」 tr. "the -1 step of the Shōgozō / Ishiyama" consistent from Chapters 44 to 46. This general note belongs to the note layer of the chapter title and is not included in the working base text's list of two hundred and thirty-seven app entries (the list takes the app element as its standard); therefore its full ledger is listed separately in this section and in Section VIII. The second (0537002)—for the character 「合」 tr. "together" the Yuan edition reads 「含」 tr. "contain". The third (0537003)—for the character 「七」 tr. "seven" the Song and Yuan read 「七上」 tr. "seven, first part" and the Ming reads 「七之上」 tr. "seven, the first part", carrying the interlinear note 「經作兩不和合過品」 tr. "the sūtra has Chapter on the Two Discords and Faults"—the Ming interlinear note joins the two names 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two discords" + 「過品」 tr. "chapter on faults" into 「兩不和合過品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Discords and Faults", a phenomenon of alternative names set side by side that is inherent in the transmission layer of the base text; recorded as it is without judgement. Judged 「異名同品」 tr. "different name, same chapter": the two parties, the 「兩不和合」 tr. "two discords" system (the base text + the title notes of the Shōgozō, the Shōgozō B, and the Ishiyama) and the 「兩過」 tr. "two faults" system (the Palace edition + T223 + Jizang in X24), are recorded side by side, without judging which text is correct; the chapter name in this edition follows the base text of this treatise, 「兩不和合品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Discords" (the main axis for chapter names in this edition is the base text of this treatise, a settled ruling; this section does not reopen it).

Interlinear notes at fascicle end and fascicle head (further evidence of the continuing -1 step pattern). At the end of Fascicle 68〔T25 0538b17〕, the interlinear note on the character 「八」 tr. "eight"—the Song and Palace read 「八(釋第四十六品訖第四十七品上)」 tr. "eight (commentary on the forty-sixth chapter, ending at the first part of the forty-seventh chapter)", the Yuan reads 「八(釋四十六品訖第四十七品之上)」 tr. "eight (commentary on the forty-sixth chapter, ending at the first part of the forty-seventh chapter)", and the Shōgozō reads 「八(釋第四十五品訖四十六品上)」 tr. "eight (commentary on the forty-fifth chapter, ending at the first part of the forty-sixth chapter)"—the Shōgozō is again at -1 (against the Song and Palace's 「四十六訖四十七」 tr. "forty-six, ending at forty-seven", the Shōgozō reads 「四十五訖四十六」 tr. "forty-five, ending at forty-six"), and the pattern continues. The continuation title of Fascicle 69〔T25 0538b20〕, one note made in five forms—the base text 「大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七之餘(卷六十九)」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Two Discords, the Forty-seventh, the remainder (Fascicle Sixty-nine)"; the Song reads 「大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下訖第四十八品上」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Sixty-nine, commentary on the forty-seventh chapter, last part, ending at the first part of the forty-eighth chapter", the Yuan 「大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下(訖第四十八品之上)」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Sixty-nine, commentary on the forty-seventh chapter, last part (ending at the first part of the forty-eighth chapter)", the Ming 「大智度論卷第六十九釋兩不和合品第四十七之下」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Sixty-nine, Commentary on the Chapter on the Two Discords, the Forty-seventh, the last part", the Palace 「大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下訖第四十八品上兩過品」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Sixty-nine, commentary on the forty-seventh chapter, last part, ending at the first part of the forty-eighth chapter, Chapter on the Two Faults" (adding a note of the three characters 「兩過品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Faults"), and the Shōgozō 「大智度論釋第四十六品下(訖第四十七品上)六十九」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, commentary on the forty-sixth chapter, last part (ending at the first part of the forty-seventh chapter), sixty-nine"—the Shōgozō's -1 persists; the three texts Song, Yuan, and Palace record that the close of Fascicle 69 in fact crosses the boundary between Chapters 47 and 48 (「訖第四十八品上」 tr. "ending at the first part of the forty-eighth chapter"), structurally the same as the way Fascicle 68 spans Chapters 46 and 47. Further, the note on the character 「念」 tr. "recollect" at the end of the chapter〔T25 0542c02〕—the Shōgozō B and the Ishiyama read 「念釋四十六品竟」 tr. "recollect; end of the commentary on the forty-sixth chapter", a -1 step of the colophon type, corresponding from head to tail with the -1 step of the chapter title. Each witness has its own source and they deviate in the same direction; recorded without judgement, and the mechanism is not forcibly explained.

The recurrence anomaly of the n attribute of the T223 mulu (「兩過品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Faults" and 「佛母品」 tr. "Chapter on the Mother of the Buddhas" are both n=48 · an anomaly of the XML markup layer recorded as it is). On the mulu encoding layer of the sūtra explained, T223: the displayed text of the mulu corresponding to this chapter reads 「47 兩過品」 tr. "47 Chapter on the Two Faults"〔T08 0320b15 近〕, and its n attribute marks 「48」 tr. "the number 48"—the +1 offset seen repeatedly since Chapter 41 continues here (Chapter 46, 「魔事品」 tr. "Chapter on the Deeds of Māra", n=47, this chapter n=48, +1 continuously chapter by chapter); but the displayed text of the next chapter's mulu, 「48 佛母品」 tr. "48 Chapter on the Mother of the Buddhas"〔T08 0323a22 近〕, has its n attribute also marked 「48」 tr. "the number 48"—recurring with this chapter and not increasing in order to 49. This apparatus independently scanned the whole text by rule; the chapter-level mulu entries with n="48" are exactly two, and each was checked against its original context and confirmed. This is a recurrence of n-attribute marking within the CBETA T223 XML itself, a flaw of the XML markup layer of the base text, not a doctrinal divergence; recorded as it is and not forcibly explained; the sequence of chapter numbers in the displayed text is itself continuous and without error, and the alignment takes the word-by-word comparison of the displayed text and the content as its standard.

Comparative reading of the full quoted sūtra (two-sided collation · sentence-by-sentence check of the opening · comparison group). The opening of Sūtra ① in this treatise is almost word for word the same as "The Two Faults" in the sūtra explained—this treatise: 「復次,須菩提!聽法人欲書、持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、問義、正憶念;說法人懈墮,不欲為說。當知是為菩薩摩訶薩魔事」 tr. "Again, Subhūti! The hearer of the Dharma wishes to write out and uphold prajñāpāramitā, to read, recite, ask the meaning, and rightly recollect it; the speaker of the Dharma is slack and does not wish to speak it for him. Know that this is a deed of Māra for the bodhisattva-mahāsattva"〔T25 0537a02〕; T223 has the same passage as 「復次,須菩提!聽法人欲書持般若波羅蜜、讀誦問義、正憶念;說法人懈惰不欲為說。當知是為菩薩魔事」 tr. "Again, Subhūti! The hearer of the Dharma wishes to write out and uphold prajñāpāramitā, to read and recite it, ask the meaning, and rightly recollect it; the speaker of the Dharma is slack and does not wish to speak it for him. Know that this is a deed of Māra for the bodhisattva"〔T08 0320b16〕—the same opening of the Buddha's address to Subhūti, the same scene structure (who wishes to write out, who does not wish to speak, what result it is tied to), the wording almost entirely the same; the difference of written form in 「懈墮/懈惰」 tr. "slack (two written forms of the same word)" and the addition or omission in 「菩薩摩訶薩/菩薩」 tr. "bodhisattva-mahāsattva / bodhisattva" belong to the layer of transmission in writing out. Comparison group: the three strings of Chinese characters 「惡魔作佛身金色丈光」 tr. "the evil Māra makes the body of a Buddha, golden-coloured with a fathom of light", 「說法者受十二頭陀」 tr. "the speaker of the Dharma takes up the twelve dhūta practices", and 「欲至他方豐樂之處」 tr. "wishes to go to a prosperous and pleasant place in another region" each appear only once in the whole of T223 and in the whole of T1509 (once each, all in this chapter); the alignment is unique, with no other chapter to confuse it—not the weak judgement of searching one text with the words of another. It is judged 「異名同品」 tr. "different name, same chapter" (the chapter name has two parties; the chapter body is word for word the same). The three 【論】 layers of this treatise are a structural expansion of the treatise form; the sūtra explained has no such layer, and they are not variant readings. The entry-by-entry statistics of the collation witnesses on the T223 side within the scope of the comparative reading for this chapter were not unfolded in this apparatus (only the two entries at the mulu layer of the chapter title and the one cross-reference with K14〔T08n0223_p0322a29, see Section VIII〕 have been checked character by character); the fact that they were not unfolded is recorded as it is, left to later collation to check and supplement, and no estimate is used to fill the number.

V. The Prajñā Eye

The eye of this chapter lies in tracking 「魔事」 tr. "the deeds of Māra" back from outer marks into causes and conditions—Māra need not appear in any form: when two good people are not of one mind, prajñā cannot be written. Its meaning can be summed up in five layers.

First, writing out prajñā too is a dharma born of causes and conditions. 「一切有為法,因緣和合故生,眾緣離則無」 tr. "Every conditioned dharma arises because causes and conditions come together; when the conditions part, it is not"〔T25 0537b02〕—seeking fire with a fire-drill, there is the drill and there is the base; the completion of the writing out of prajñā is tied to 「師、弟子同心同事」 tr. "teacher and disciple being of one mind and one undertaking". Therefore this chapter does not blame one side: speaker and hearer each have their good and each their bias, and when bias meets bias, that is a parting of the conditions—and a parting of the conditions is a deed of Māra, without waiting for Māra to come.

Second, even where there is no offence there is a deed of Māra. The twelve dhūta practices 「不名為戒,能行,則戒莊嚴;不能行,不犯戒」 tr. "are not called precepts; if one can practise them, the precepts are adorned; if one cannot practise them, one does not break the precepts"〔T25 0537b28〕—one person takes them up and the other does not, and neither has an offence; yet 「兩不和合,則是魔事」 tr. "the two not being in accord is a deed of Māra". The criterion for a deed of Māra is not sin and merit but whether prajñā is accomplished or not; this is the finest cut of this chapter: when wholesome dharma meets wholesome dharma and neither yields, the loss is equal to that of evil.

Third, belittling each other is the proximate cause of discord. 「一人離五蓋,一人不離,故相輕,相輕故不和合。一切上法皆爾」 tr. "One person has left the five hindrances and one has not, and so they belittle each other, and because they belittle each other they are not in accord. All the higher dharmas are like this"〔T25 0540b15〕—every higher dharma one cultivates can be turned into material for belittling others; the teacher belittles the disciple with his virtue, and the disciple belittles skilful means with his simple belief; the two Chinese characters 「相輕」 tr. "belittle each other" gather up the root of the sickness of all the more than twenty pairs.

Fourth, a good thing can be a deed of Māra. 「聲聞、辟支佛經,無有慈悲,不求佛道,但欲自度;雖是好事,破菩薩道,故名魔事」 tr. "The sūtras of the śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas have no kindness and compassion; they do not seek the path of the Buddha but wish only to deliver themselves; though they are good things, they break the bodhisattva path, and so are called deeds of Māra"〔T25 0542a20〕; and even when the body of a Buddha appears before one, grasping at its marks and craving and clinging: 「一切煩惱、取相,皆是魔事」 tr. "every affliction and every grasping at marks is a deed of Māra"〔T25 0542a23〕—Māra does not ruin a person with evil; he ruins him with the semblance, he ruins him with the good; letting go the treasure of great price and taking the little gold is called diminishment.

Fifth, precious things have many thieves, and the Buddha's protection goes unnoticed. 「如閻浮提金銀等,多怨多賊為是故出,不為瓦石等生」 tr. "Like the gold, silver, and the rest of Jambudvīpa: the many enemies and many thieves come out for their sake; they do not arise for tiles and stones and the like"〔T25 0542b05〕—the many hindrances are exactly the proof that prajñā is precious. And the protection comes from above: by the Buddha's power the deeds of Māra do not arise, and the buddhas and bodhisattvas of the ten directions guard, protect, and assist; 「如賊繞城,大人守護,小兒不覺」 tr. "as when thieves surround a city, the grown men keep guard and the small children do not notice"〔T25 0542b28〕. The one sentence at the end of the chapter gathers up the positive side of the whole chapter: 「佛意但欲令行者成般若大事,是故師徒宜應和合,一切惡事,不應計念」 tr. "The Buddha's intent is only that the practitioner accomplish the great matter of prajñā; therefore teacher and disciple should be in accord, and should not take any evil thing to heart"〔T25 0542c01〕—to be aware of Māra is the guarding; to be in accord is the accomplishing; not taking evil things to heart is the medicine that the chapter of the two discords itself prescribes.

VI. Divergent Readings of the Masters

The Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa has no tradition of a complete line-by-line commentary, and the ancient masters' citations and explanations are, as a matter of fact, partial and uneven. For this chapter there is only one ancient master's reading: Jizang's commentary on the sūtra explained preserves a complete chapter devoted to it; Huiying's commentary on the treatise has zero coverage of this chapter; Junzheng's book has no citation of this chapter; and the search back through the two Tiantai lines for this chapter's name and content is closed as a negative proposition (see below)—the density of ancient-master reflection for this chapter is the thinnest in this collection so far; recorded as it is. This section records the correspondence between what they comment on and cite and this chapter, without judging the relative merit of the masters' interpretations.

Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451). Its line-by-line commentary on "The Two Faults" in the sūtra explained begins at〔X24n0451 0295a13〕 (the mulu entry 「兩過品第四十七」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Faults, the Forty-seventh", immediately following the point where the commentary on Chapter 46, "The Deeds of Māra", ends) and runs to just before〔X24n0451 0296b05〕 (where the next mulu entry, 「佛母品第四十八」 tr. "Chapter on the Mother of the Buddhas, the Forty-eighth", begins; this section determines this according to the continuous sequence of mulu entries), covering the whole of the sūtra of this chapter. Four things in it may be recorded. First, the overall judgement of the chapter's place—「第二、明兩過人共有魔事也。前既是魔事,為品亦爾」 tr. "Second, it makes clear that persons at fault on both sides together have deeds of Māra. Since the preceding was the deeds of Māra, this chapter is so as well"〔X24n0451 0295a14〕: Jizang takes this chapter as established in continuation of the deeds of Māra of the preceding chapter—the preceding chapter a fault on one side, this chapter faults on both sides—and the chapter name he relies on is precisely 「兩過品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Faults". Second, the classification of inner and outer Māra—「第一、多明內魔;第二、多明外魔。外魔之中形聲兩亂,內魔之中師與弟子」 tr. "First, it mostly makes clear the inner Māra; second, it mostly makes clear the outer Māra. Within the outer Māra there are the two disturbances of form and voice; within the inner Māra there are teacher and disciple"〔X24n0451 0295a21〕: he takes the discord of teacher and disciple as the inner Māra and Māra's conjured forms and voices as the outer Māra, and makes clear their mutual support: 「內魔中非無外魔成助,外魔之中非無內魔成資」 tr. "within the inner Māra it is not that there is no outer Māra lending help; within the outer Māra it is not that there is no inner Māra lending support". Third, the count of the pairs—「內外合說二十六雙,約次第而判者可為四倒」 tr. "Inner and outer spoken of together make twenty-six pairs; judged by their order, they can be taken as four reversals"〔X24n0451 0295a24〕: Jizang himself counts the pairs of this chapter as twenty-six in all, and divides them into fourteen pairs in which teacher and disciple do not know each other, two pairs that make clear the teacher alone, five pairs that make clear the disciple, and five pairs that make clear the teacher again—the ancient master has his own count and division; this apparatus records his numbers and does not force them into agreement with the paragraph division of this edition. Fourth, the three divisions of the final passage—「一、明留難;二、釋疑;三、佛力故難不能難也」 tr. "First, it makes clear the hindrances; second, it resolves the doubt; third, by the Buddha's power the difficulties cannot make difficulty"〔X24n0451 0296a06〕: he gathers up the end of the chapter in the three divisions of hindrance, resolving the doubt (the simile of the precious things answering why prajñā has many difficulties), and the Buddha's power, in full accord with the narrative of Sūtra ③ of this chapter. Further, the X24 commentary itself uses the words 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two discords" in its text on the preceding chapter—「或有所受更無能授,兩不和合,天魔事也」 tr. "or there is one who would receive and no one able to give; the two discords are a deed of the Māra of the heavens"〔X24n0451 0294b06〕—both names, 「兩過」 tr. "the two faults" and 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two discords", appear under Jizang's brush; recorded as it is.

Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791) · zero coverage (recorded as it is). It is the only ancient commentary explaining this treatise, and survives only in fragmentary fascicles. A search back through the whole of X46n0791 for both systems of this chapter's name (Chapter on the Two Discords / Chapter on the Two Faults) gives zero hits in every case; Fascicles 68 and 69 of the treatise, to which this chapter belongs, are not within the coverage of the fragmentary fascicles—the zero coverage belongs to the actual state of the fragments, not to a failure of search, and the negative result is recorded as it is.

Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784) · zero hits (recorded as it is). A search back through the whole of X46n0784 for both systems of the chapter name gives zero hits; Junzheng has no named citation of this chapter.

The two Tiantai lines · closed as a negative proposition (a dedicated search, recorded as found). Four works—Zhiyi's Great Calming and Contemplation (T46n1911), Zhanran's Supporting Practice and Broad Resolution of Calming and Contemplation (T46n1912), Zhiyi's Profound Meaning of the Lotus (T33n1716), and, of the line of Zhanran's Notes on the Words and Phrases of the Lotus, the Annotations on the Profound Meaning of the Lotus (T33n1717)—were searched back word for word: 「兩不和合」 tr. "the two discords" and 「兩過品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Faults" give zero hits in every case. 「十二頭陀」 tr. "the twelve dhūta practices" appears once in T46n1911 (0041c15), three times in T46n1912 (0165b11/0264b06/0267a22), and once in T33n1717 (0850b20)—each checked in its context, all are Tiantai's own independent statements of the general meaning of the twelve dhūta practices (in contexts such as the explanation of dhyānapāramitā); no word-for-word citation of this chapter's enumeration pattern 「一作阿蘭若……十二但三衣」 tr. "first, dwelling in the araṇya … twelfth, keeping only the three robes" is seen, nor is this chapter's title named; the several occurrences of 「聽法人」 tr. "the hearer of the Dharma" and 「說法人」 tr. "the speaker of the Dharma" in T46n1912 are all in contexts of general exhortation and praise of the merit of hearing and speaking the Dharma, unrelated to this chapter's paired doctrine, ‘the discord of the two parties, speaker and hearer, is a deed of Māra’—the likeness of wording is purely a shared use of terms, not a relation of citation; closed as a negative proposition: the two Tiantai lines have no traceable direct citation of this chapter. A zero hit is also an entry in the ledger; the citation examples of other chapters are not used to fill it.

VII. Cross-reading and Further Resonances

The lines of meaning of this chapter, carried on before and after, are five; all are recorded in this section and do not stand in for a fixed reading.

First, the continuation of the section on the deeds of Māra (Chapter 46 → 47 · a hard link within this treatise itself). The preceding chapter, "The Deeds of Māra", makes clear the marks of the arising of the deeds of Māra; this chapter makes clear the marks of the discord of the two parties, speaker and hearer—the Palace edition's chapter title names it outright 「兩過品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Faults", and Jizang divides it thus: 「前既是魔事,為品亦爾,今既兩過,前則獨過」 tr. "since the preceding was the deeds of Māra, this chapter is so as well; now, since there are faults on both sides, the preceding was a fault on one side alone" (see Section VI); that the two chapters form one section was already seen by the ancient master. The collation layer also leaves a mechanical trace of continuity: three of the twenty-two star repeated-citation notes of this chapter have their target notes falling within the range of Chapter 46 (〔T25 0533a06〕〔T25 0533c01〕〔T25 0536c06〕, see Section VIII)—the same variant reading shares a note across the chapters, and the encoding layer of the base text itself attests that the two chapters are joined. Further, where the treatise explains the semblance of prajñā, it points back to earlier text: 「如相似般若波羅蜜中說」 tr. "as said in the passage on the semblance of prajñāpāramitā"〔T25 0542a19〕—an internal pointer back to the section on the semblance of prajñā in Chapter 46; the treatise-author himself forms warp and weft.

Second, the internal pointers of 「如先答」 tr. "as answered before" (noted by the treatise-author himself). Treatise ② twice points back to its own earlier answers: 「如先答:弟子見師有過故,不欲受法」 tr. "As answered before: because the disciple sees that the teacher has faults, he does not wish to receive the Dharma"〔T25 0540b11〕; 「一人呵三惡道,一人讚歎諸天,是事如先答」 tr. "One person rebukes the three evil destinies and one person praises the gods: this matter is as answered before"〔T25 0540b17〕—the explanation of later pairs is merged into that of earlier pairs, the treatise form checking its own prolixity; recorded as it is.

Third, the dhūta practices and the four noble lineages (the treatise itself ties them to the ancient rule). 「於古四聖種中,頭陀即是三事」 tr. "Among the ancient four noble lineages, the dhūta practices are three of the matters"〔T25 0538b14〕, and it further cites the rule of the five bhikṣus' robes of rags at the time of the turning of the wheel of the Dharma (see Section III)—the treatise-author proves the origin of the dhūta practices from the ancient rules of the Buddha's own time, and the sentence 「佛法唯以智慧為本,不以苦為先」 tr. "The Buddha's Dharma takes wisdom alone as its root; it does not put suffering first"〔T25 0538b14〕 sets the limit of the dhūta practices; it is what the treatise-literature on the meaning of dhūta practice in later generations bases itself on.

Fourth, later citation (zero hits in the Tiantai line · recorded as it is). Both systems of the chapter name give zero hits in every case in the four Tiantai works (see the closure as a negative proposition in Section VI); although the twelve dhūta practices are a heading habitually used in Tiantai literature, all are independent statements of the general meaning, not citations of this chapter. No named citation of this chapter by the Tiantai line is seen; however, for Chapter 46 there are separately two places where Zhanran's Supporting Practice and Broad Resolution of Calming and Contemplation explicitly names the chapter title (「具如魔事品中說」 tr. "in full, as said in the Chapter on the Deeds of Māra"〔T46 0406a16〕, 「大品魔事品文」 tr. "the text of the Chapter on the Deeds of Māra in the Larger Sūtra"〔T46 0406b02〕 · see Section III of that chapter's apparatus), so the preceding chapter may not be lumped under the 「未見型」 tr. "not-seen type" together with this one. Further, there are not even hits on the wording of the 「十喻」 tr. "ten similes" type, and the ancient-master reflection is Jizang's alone—a chapter of low witness density, recorded as it is, layer by layer.

Fifth, linking to the treasury (stable citation · soft citation). This chapter's meaning of teacher and disciple, ‘the two minds not in accord are a deed of Māra’; its practice-by-practice explanation of the causes and conditions of the twelve dhūta practices; its judgement on semblance dharmas, 「以著心行六波羅蜜,是名似」 tr. "to practise the six perfections with a clinging mind is called the semblance"; its meaning of grasping at marks, 「一切煩惱、取相,皆是魔事」 tr. "every affliction and every grasping at marks is a deed of Māra"; and its meaning of hindrance, that the precious things of Jambudvīpa have many thieves—these are what the treatises on the practice of guarding prajñā and on the mutual embrace of teacher and disciple base themselves on; they are set down as a stable citation〔T25n1509 兩不和合品·卷六十八–六十九〕; the places where the Heart Sūtra, the Diamond Sūtra, and the Consciousness-only collections cite this treatise are not yet finalised, so the citation is soft, awaiting word-for-word checking of what is kept there. This belongs to the carrying-on of the meaning of prajñā down through the sūtras; recorded without judgement.

VIII. Witnesses and Editions

The base text of this chapter is Fascicles 68 to 69 of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa〔T25 0537a01–0542c03〕 (the main text of the chapter body begins from the chapter title〔T25 0537a01〕; the First Part ends at the fascicle-end title 「大智度論卷第六十八」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Fascicle Sixty-eight"〔T25 0538b17〕; the Last Part begins from the continuation title 「大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七之餘」 tr. "Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa, Commentary on the Chapter on the Two Discords, the Forty-seventh, the remainder"〔T25 0538b20〕 and ends with the passage 「略說魔事如是……不應計念」 tr. "Thus the deeds of Māra are spoken of in brief … should not take to heart"〔T25 0542b29〕; the next chapter begins at 0542c03, and Fascicle 69 does not close within this chapter); the collation text for the sūtra explained is "The Two Faults" in the Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra〔T08 0320b15 起〕; the ancient-master commentary text for collation is Jizang's Commentary on the Larger Sūtra (X24n0451, covering this chapter at〔X24n0451 0295a13–0296b05〕, up to just before the end point); Huiying's Commentary (X46n0791) has zero coverage of this chapter, Junzheng's Profound Meaning of the Four Mahāyāna Treatises (X46n0784) has no citation of this chapter, and the two Tiantai lines are closed as a negative proposition (see Section VI). The variant collation notes follow the Taishō collation, covering differences between the Taishō base text and the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace editions, the Shōgozō manuscript, the Shōgozō B manuscript, and the Ishiyama text (the Ishiyama-dera manuscript), as well as the Korean Canon (K) and the CBETA collation.

The witness layer (the Shōgozō B continuing dense · the contrast of collation in a chapter of low witness density). Although the ancient-master reflection of this chapter is thin (see Section VI), its collation witnesses are, on the contrary, dense: the Shōgozō B text, continuing its large appearance since Chapter 45, appears roughly a hundred times in the collation notes of this chapter, especially densely in Fascicle 69 of the Last Part; the appearances of the Ishiyama text are mostly in the same group as the Shōgozō B. At the end of the chapter〔T25 0542c02〕 the Shōgozō B and the Ishiyama together give the -1-step marker of the colophon type, 「念釋四十六品竟」 tr. "recollect; end of the commentary on the forty-sixth chapter" (see Section IV). In the base text of this chapter no entries of the single-appearance type from the Korean Canon B text, the Southern Canon, or the Northern Canon are seen—unlike Chapter 45 (one or two appearances each); the negative result is recorded as it is.

Five special entries of CBETA emendation according to the Korean Canon (the lem is a CBETA emendation · listed separately). Five entries of this chapter belong to the special type of the modern CBETA collation layer emended according to the Korean Canon (K14n0549); each was checked word for word against the base text, and they are listed separately: first,〔T25 0537b19〕「離(K14n0549_p1176a13)(T07n0220_p0837b09)【CB】【麗-CB】|雖【大】|離【宮】【聖】」 tr. "‘separate’ in CBETA and the Korean Canon; ‘although’ in the Taishō; ‘separate’ in the Palace and the Shōgozō"—a compound entry carrying a cross-reference to the parallel position in the Great Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra; second,〔T25 0538a06〕「可(K14n0549_p1176c11)(T40n1804_p0130b16)【CB】【麗-CB】|不【大】|可【宮】【聖】【聖乙】|可不【石】」 tr. "‘about’ in CBETA and the Korean Canon; ‘not’ in the Taishō; ‘about’ in the Palace, the Shōgozō, and the Shōgozō B; ‘about, not’ in the Ishiyama"—carrying a cross-reference to Daoxuan's Commentary on Practices from the Four-Part Vinaya, the first appearance in this collection of the type of cross-reference to the Vinaya section of the canon; third,〔T25 0538a15〕「臭(K14n0549_p1176c21)【CB】【麗-CB】|嗅【大】」 tr. "‘stinking’ in CBETA and the Korean Canon; ‘smelling’ in the Taishō"; fourth,〔T25 0538a22〕「著(K14n0549_p1177a06)【CB】【麗-CB】|者【大】|著【聖】」 tr. "‘put on’ in CBETA and the Korean Canon; ‘one who’ in the Taishō; ‘put on’ in the Shōgozō"; fifth,〔T25 0541a17〕「墮(K14n0549_p1181a14)(T08n0223_p0322a29)【CB】【麗-CB】|隨【大】|隨【聖】」 tr. "‘falls’ in CBETA and the Korean Canon; ‘follows’ in the Taishō; ‘follows’ in the Shōgozō"—carrying a cross-reference to the corresponding position in the sūtra explained, T223, and this entry is at the same time a star note shared at the same anchor (see below). Three of the five entries carry a second-level cross-reference (cf2); their quoted strings are, in the base text, a continuous splicing of cf1 immediately followed by cf2; the type is recorded as it is; the reader-facing text of this edition follows the reading of the current CBETA text.

Twenty-two star entries (three with targets across chapters · their type listed separately). The star-corresp repeated-citation entries of this chapter (the same variant reading recurring in the text and sharing one note) number twenty-two, marked with each entry in the table below; checking the corresp target of each: the targets of nineteen fall within the range of this chapter (native within the chapter), and those of three fall within the range of Chapter 46—the note on the character 【經】 at〔T25 0537a02〕 (target 0533002 = the note at〔T25 0533a06〕), the note on the character 【論】 at〔T25 0537b02〕 (target 0533023 = the note at〔T25 0533c01〕), and the note on the character for ‘secure’ at〔T25 0538a03〕 (target 0536016 = the note at〔T25 0536c06〕)—unlike Chapter 45 (all forty-seven entries within the chapter), and of the same type as Chapter 43 (one entry across chapters) and Chapter 44 (four entries across chapters); recorded as it is. The bulk of them are recurrences, place by place, of single characters such as 「掉/挑」 tr. "restless / pick" (the Shōgozō B and the Ishiyama consistently read the latter, four appearances in a continuous passage), 「書/盡」 tr. "write out / exhaust" (the Shōgozō or the Shōgozō B repeatedly read the latter), and 「深/〔缺〕」 tr. "deep / [missing]" (the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Palace habitually omit the character 「深」 tr. "deep"), none of which touch doctrine.

Complete ledger of collation notes (all two hundred and thirty-seven entries reconciled · base text as it stands). Below, transcribed in their original form from the working base text—the collation notes of this chapter total two hundred and thirty-seven app entries, agreeing mechanically with app 237, the tool value of extract --check on the working base text. The app entries are listed in full in the order of their appearance in the base text, including twenty-two star-corresp repeated citations (their target note numbers and target locations marked with each entry); the five CBETA emendations according to the Korean Canon and the entries of the chapter-title and fascicle-title groups are marked with each entry. The general note on the chapter title (0537001, the full ledger of six forms) belongs to the note layer of the chapter title and is not in the app list; it has already been listed separately in Section IV. The readings of the variant texts are preserved side by side, while the main text still follows the reading of the current base text:

App entries (two hundred and thirty-seven · in order of appearance in the base text · star-corresp marked with each entry)

  • 〔T25 0537a01〕合【大】|含【元】(the second note on the chapter title · the Yuan edition's 「含」 tr. "contain" · see Section IV)
  • 〔T25 0537a01〕七【大】|七上【宋】【元】|七之上(經作兩不和合過品)【明】(the third note on the chapter title · the Ming edition's interlinear note 「經作兩不和合過品」 tr. "the sūtra has Chapter on the Two Discords and Faults" · see Section IV)
  • 〔T25 0537a02〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖乙】(star · corresp → note(0533002) = the note at〔T25 0533a06〕 in Chapter 46, across chapters · shared across chapters)
  • 〔T25 0537a04〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0537a06〕為【大】|菩薩【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537a14〕般【大】|持般【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b02〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖乙】(star · corresp → note(0533023) = the note at〔T25 0533c01〕 in Chapter 46, across chapters · shared across chapters)
  • 〔T25 0537b03〕攢【大】|鑽【宋】【元】【明】【聖】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b03〕鑽【大】|錯【聖】|攢【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b07〕正【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b10〕知【大】|和【聖】
  • 〔T25 0537b11〕不能知【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0537b11〕更無餘處【大】|處無餘受【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b12〕諮【大】|證【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b12〕悲【大】|慈悲【聖】
  • 〔T25 0537b15〕為【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0537004) = the note at〔T25 0537a04〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0537b17〕同,能【大】|因緣【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b19〕因【大】|內【聖】
  • 〔T25 0537b19〕離(K14n0549_p1176a13)(T07n0220_p0837b09)【CB】【麗-CB】|雖【大】|離【宮】【聖】(CBETA emendation according to the Korean Canon · carrying a cross-reference to the parallel position in the Great Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra · listed separately in Section VIII)
  • 〔T25 0537b22〕土【大】|生【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537b24〕追【大】|得追【聖】|追追【石】
  • 〔T25 0537b26〕皆【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c04〕而【大】|向【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c05〕蘭【大】|練【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c06〕最【大】|厭【聖】
  • 〔T25 0537c09〕德【大】|得【石】
  • 〔T25 0537c12〕責【大】|惰【宮】|㥽【石】
  • 〔T25 0537c12〕憂【大】|愛【明】
  • 〔T25 0537c13〕擯【大】|儐【宮】【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c13〕料【大】|斷【宮】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0537c14〕妨【大】|好【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c15〕常【大】|當【聖】
  • 〔T25 0537c16〕邪【大】|耶【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0537c20〕念【大】|命【石】
  • 〔T25 0537c21〕妨【大】|好【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a01〕廢【大】|癈【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a02〕量【大】|量食法【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a02〕所【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a03〕穩【大】|隱【宮】(star · corresp → note(0536016) = the note at〔T25 0536c06〕 in Chapter 46, across chapters · shared across chapters)
  • 〔T25 0538a05〕之【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538a05〕中【大】|〔-〕【宮】【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a06〕可(K14n0549_p1176c11)(T40n1804_p0130b16)【CB】【麗-CB】|不【大】|可【宮】【聖】【聖乙】|可不【石】(CBETA emendation according to the Korean Canon · carrying a cross-reference to the Commentary on Practices · listed separately in Section VIII)
  • 〔T25 0538a06〕食【大】|貪【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a07〕心【大】|心生【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0538a08〕轡【大】|〔-〕【宮】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0538a09〕噉草【大】|嚴菓【聖】|嚴草【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a09〕路【大】|略【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a09〕轡【大】|變【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a09〕不【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0538a10〕噉草【大】|嚴草【聖乙】(star · corresp → note(0538010) = the note at〔T25 0538a09〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0538a11〕門【大】|初門【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0538a12〕藉【大】|𧂐【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538a15〕臭(K14n0549_p1176c21)【CB】【麗-CB】|嗅【大】(CBETA emendation according to the Korean Canon · listed separately in Section VIII)
  • 〔T25 0538a15〕相【大】|想【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0538a16〕能作【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0538a17〕道【大】|著【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538a21〕蔭【大】|陰【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a22〕著(K14n0549_p1177a06)【CB】【麗-CB】|者【大】|著【聖】(CBETA emendation according to the Korean Canon · listed separately in Section VIII)
  • 〔T25 0538a23〕露【大】|路【石】
  • 〔T25 0538a24〕蟲【大】|虫【宋】【宮】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538a26〕脫【大】|服【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538b03〕第【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538b04〕蓋【大】|善【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538b05〕但【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0538b05〕法【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0538b10〕陀【大】|隨【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b12〕我【大】|或【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b13〕棄【大】|疾【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b14〕古【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b14〕是【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0538b16〕隨道【大】|道首【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b17〕八【大】|八(釋第四十六品訖第四十七品上)【宋】【宮】|八(釋四十六品訖第四十七品之上)【元】|八(釋第四十五品訖四十六品上)【聖】(interlinear note at the end of Fascicle 68 · the Song, Palace, and Yuan system 「釋第四十六品訖第四十七品上」 tr. "commentary on the forty-sixth chapter, ending at the first part of the forty-seventh chapter" · the Shōgozō at the -1 step, 「釋第四十五品訖四十六品上」 tr. "commentary on the forty-fifth chapter, ending at the first part of the forty-sixth chapter" · see Section IV)
  • 〔T25 0538b20〕大智度論釋兩不和合品第四十七之餘(卷六十九)【大】|大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下訖第四十八品上【宋】|大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下(訖第四十八品之上)【元】|大智度論卷第六十九釋兩不和合品第四十七之下【明】|大智度論卷第六十九釋第四十七品下訖第四十八品上兩過品【宮】|大智度論釋第四十六品下(訖第四十七品上)六十九【聖】(the continuation title of Fascicle 69, one note made in five forms · the Song and Yuan 「訖第四十八品上」 tr. "ending at the first part of the forty-eighth chapter" · the Palace also carrying 「兩過品」 tr. "Chapter on the Two Faults" · the Shōgozō at the -1 step, 「第四十六品下」 tr. "the forty-sixth chapter, last part" · see Section IV)
  • 〔T25 0538b25〕【經】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538b25〕書【大】|令書【石】|令盡【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538b27〕書【大】|盡【聖乙】(star · corresp → note(0538038) = the note at〔T25 0538b25〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0538b28〕知【大】|智【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538c02〕慳【大】|堅【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538c07〕藥、資【大】|資藥【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538c08〕欲【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538c12〕闇【大】|闇人【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538c16〕優【大】|憂【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538c16〕聽【大】|故聽【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0538c16〕知【大】|和【聖】
  • 〔T25 0538c18〕不【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539a12〕者【大】|人【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0539a17〕蜜【大】|蜜讀誦【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0539a19〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0539a22〕兩【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539a24〕掉【大】|挑【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0539a25〕掉【大】|挑【聖乙】【石】(star · corresp → note(0539005) = the note at〔T25 0539a24〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0539a26〕掉【大】|挑【聖乙】【石】(star · corresp → note(0539005) = the note at〔T25 0539a24〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0539a27〕掉【大】|挑【聖乙】【石】(star · corresp → note(0539005) = the note at〔T25 0539a24〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0539b03〕書【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539b03〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0539b10〕生樂【大】|樂生【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0539b14〕苦,求阿耨多羅三藐三菩提為?』兩不和合,不【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0539b23〕書【大】|盡【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539b25〕聽【大】|聖【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0539b27〕書【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539b27〕念【大】|令【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539b29〕正【大】|心【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0539b29〕念【大】|令【聖】(star · corresp → note(0539013) = the note at〔T25 0539b27〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0539c20〕少【大】|妙【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539c20〕兩【大】|〔-〕【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539c21〕是為【大】|言為【聖乙】|是言【石】
  • 〔T25 0539c21〕距【大】|拒【元】【明】
  • 〔T25 0539c21〕我【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0539c24〕旃【大】|栴【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0539c25〕者【大】|者不【聖】
  • 〔T25 0539c25〕逐【大】|遂【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0539c29〕少【大】|妙【聖】(star · corresp → note(0539015) = the note at〔T25 0539c20〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0540a02〕訊【大】|說【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540a06〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a14〕故【大】|故名【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a15〕師【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540a16〕或羞【大】|戒著【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a16〕似【大】|妙【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a19〕好【大】|如好【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a19〕波羅蜜【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540a20〕誦【大】|讀【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a21〕亦是【大】|是亦【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a21〕師【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0540a22〕罪【大】|羅【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a23〕事【大】|法事【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540a27〕不【大】|〔-〕【聖】|行不【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540a28〕讀誦【大】|誦讀【石】
  • 〔T25 0540a29〕直【大】|真【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b02〕時【大】|有時【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b06〕解【大】|能【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b08〕讀誦【大】|誦讀【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0540b09〕導【大】|道【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b11〕欲【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b12〕受法【大】|受【宮】【聖乙】【石】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b13〕化【大】|導【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540b13〕或【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540b13〕邪【大】|耶【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b14〕行【大】|〔-〕【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b16〕合【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b16〕切上法皆爾【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b16〕復次【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b17〕正【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b19〕都【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b19〕且【大】|但【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b20〕聚【大】|取【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b20〕多有【大】|有多【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540b21〕將【大】|持【聖】【聖乙】|侍【石】
  • 〔T25 0540b26〕止【大】|心【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b26〕法【大】|汝【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540b26〕不聽,作是念:「何用是事?損我功德!」 tr. "What use is this matter? It harms my merit!"聽法者意【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540b27〕謂【大】|諸【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540c01〕財【大】|則【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c01〕養【大】|故【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540c02〕則【大】|是則【石】
  • 〔T25 0540c02〕薄【大】|輕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c03〕經嶮【大】|逕險【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c06〕亦【大】|二【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c07〕羞【大】|著【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540c07〕任涉【大】|住法【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c08〕諳【大】|諸【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540c09〕稱【大】|講【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c09〕美【大】|義【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540c09〕時【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540c09〕慮【大】|惠【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c10〕謂【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0540c10〕飲食【大】|欲食【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0540c13〕彼【大】|彼國【聖】
  • 〔T25 0540c13〕勿【大】|無【石】
  • 〔T25 0540c15〕好【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0540c18〕至【大】|去【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541a01〕護【大】|誰【石】
  • 〔T25 0541a02〕枉【大】|抂【聖】|往【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541a04〕樂著【大】|著樂【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541a10〕是【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541a10〕書【大】|盡【聖】(star · corresp → note(0539010) = the note at〔T25 0539b23〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0541a17〕墮【大】|隨【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541a17〕墮(K14n0549_p1181a14)(T08n0223_p0322a29)【CB】【麗-CB】|隨【大】|隨【聖】(CBETA emendation according to the Korean Canon · carrying a cross-reference to the sūtra explained · listed separately in Section VIII)(star · corresp → note(0541007) = the note at〔T25 0541a17〕 within the chapter · a note shared at the same anchor)
  • 〔T25 0541a19〕不【大】|兩不【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541a19〕深【大】|成【宋】【元】【宮】【聖】|成深【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541a21〕作【大】|〔-〕【宮】【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541a22〕際【大】|除【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541a23〕辟【大】|得辟【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541a23〕兩【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0541a25〕菩薩【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541b05〕而【大】|速【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541b05〕空【大】|空外空【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541b07〕用【大】|由【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541b09〕形【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0541b12〕貪著【大】|因緣【宋】【元】【明】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541b13〕減【大】|咸【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541b13〕婆【大】|波【聖】
  • 〔T25 0541b17〕從【大】|作【石】
  • 〔T25 0541b18〕多【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541b18〕乃至正憶念【大】|〔-〕【宮】
  • 〔T25 0541b24〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0539007) = the note at〔T25 0539b03〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0541b26〕有【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0541b27〕是【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0541006) = the note at〔T25 0541a10〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0541c01〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0541c02〕受【大】|受持【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541c04〕寶【大】|〔-〕【宮】【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541c09〕書【大】|盡【聖】(star · corresp → note(0539010) = the note at〔T25 0539b23〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0541c11〕人【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541c13〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0539007) = the note at〔T25 0539b03〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0541c18〕新【大】|雜【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541c20〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0541c27〕是【大】|若【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0541c29〕禪【大】|禪定【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542a06〕深【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】(star · corresp → note(0539007) = the note at〔T25 0539b03〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0542a07〕【論】【大】|〔-〕【宋】【宮】【聖乙】(star · corresp → note(0540002) = the note at〔T25 0540a06〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0542a11〕邪【大】|耶【聖】【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542a12〕得【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542a12〕受【大】|授【明】
  • 〔T25 0542a14〕廣【大】|魔【聖】【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0542a15〕證【大】|不證【石】
  • 〔T25 0542a18〕似【大】|以【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542a18〕名【大】|多【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542a21〕雖【大】|離【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542a22〕信心【大】|心信【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0542a29〕價寶【大】|賈【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542a29〕減【大】|咸【聖】(star · corresp → note(0541020) = the note at〔T25 0541b13〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0542b04〕憎【大】|壞【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b05〕賊【大】|賤【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b06〕瓦石【大】|在色【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b08〕呰【大】|訾【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b10〕呰【大】|訾【宋】【元】【明】【宮】【聖】(star · corresp → note(0542014) = the note at〔T25 0542b08〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0542b10〕壞【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542b11〕故【大】|〔-〕【宋】【元】【明】【宮】
  • 〔T25 0542b12〕但【大】|恒【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b13〕三【大】|三寶【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0542b20〕邪【大】|耶【聖】【聖乙】(star · corresp → note(0542001) = the note at〔T25 0542a11〕 within the chapter · shared within the chapter)
  • 〔T25 0542b20〕定【大】|〔-〕【聖乙】【石】
  • 〔T25 0542b21〕軟【大】|濡【宮】【石】
  • 〔T25 0542b25〕初【大】|初心【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b26〕身【大】|身命【聖】
  • 〔T25 0542b28〕繞【大】|嬈【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542b29〕然【大】|燃【聖乙】
  • 〔T25 0542c02〕念【大】|念釋四十六品竟【聖乙】【石】(the Shōgozō B and the Ishiyama 「念釋四十六品竟」 tr. "recollect; end of the commentary on the forty-sixth chapter" · a -1 step of the colophon type · see Section IV) The above two hundred and thirty-seven entries agree mechanically with the number of anchored collation notes in the working base text; the targets of the star entries are marked with each entry (the three across chapters have been listed separately above). The several places bearing on the chapter name and the fascicle titles (the two notes on the chapter title〔0537a01〕, the end of Fascicle 68〔0538b17〕, the continuation title of Fascicle 69〔0538b20〕, and the colophon at the end of the chapter〔0542c02〕) have been listed separately above, and collated both ways against the sūtra explained and the ancient master's commentary (Section IV, Section VI).

Witness statistics for the sūtra explained (not unfolded · the gap recorded for later supplementing). The entry-by-entry statistics of the collation witnesses on the T223 side within the scope of the comparative reading for this chapter (from〔T08 0320b15〕 to before the next chapter) were not unfolded in this apparatus (only the two entries at the mulu layer of the chapter title and the T223 cross-reference position of the K14 entry have been checked character by character; see Section IV and this section); the fact that they were not unfolded is recorded as it is, left to later collation to check and supplement, and no estimate is used to fill the number.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing. The full statement of AI's role across the 指月 project is maintained at methodology.

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0