大智度論 校量舍利品之上Dazhidulun — Mahāprajñāpāramitā-upadeśa · Weighing the Relics, Part 1 of 2

校量舍利品之上:舍利與般若二分之中取般若,如意寶珠喻般若功德(經+論)

〔T25 0475b02〕
本品心要Chapter essence

這一品,佛出了一道天秤上的難題。佛問帝釋:把滿閻浮提的佛舍利放作一分,把一卷寫下來的般若波羅蜜放作另一分,這兩分之中,你取哪一分?帝釋答得毫不遲疑:我寧取般若經卷。不是不敬舍利——他明說,供養芥子那麼小一粒舍利,功德都無量無邊;只是他看得更深一層:舍利之所以尊貴,是因為它「從般若波羅蜜中生、般若波羅蜜薰修故」才得人供養。舍利是果,般若是那薰它、成它的本。取般若,就是取舍利之所從生。這一秤、一問、一取,就是全品的骨——「校量舍利」四字,秤的正是舍利與般若孰為本末。

舍利弗卻在旁邊插進一句尖銳的質問:般若不可取啊——它無色、無形、無對,只是一相,所謂無相,你怎麼「取」得?帝釋答得漂亮:正因為「般若波羅蜜不行二法故,不二法相是般若波羅蜜」。他取的不是一件有相之物,取的是那個不落兩邊、無二無分別的般若;為了利益初發心的人,才順著世諦說一個「取」字。佛聽了連聲讚歎,又替他往深裡推一句:法性與般若無二無別,實際、不可思議性與般若也無二無別。般若既是無相無貌、無言無說,受持它的人心一深入,就「不見怖畏相」——沒有一個相可怖畏。帝釋還打了個親切的比方:他常在善法堂上坐,就算他不在座,諸天子也向他的空座作禮而去;同樣,般若經卷所在之處,十方的天龍夜叉都來禮拜供養——因為見般若就與見佛無異,「般若波羅蜜與佛無二無別故」。於是佛把秤越加越重,從滿閻浮提,加到三千大千世界,再加到恒河沙數世界滿中舍利;帝釋三周校量,一味只取般若。

為什麼舍利依般若才尊?論主用一個最實在的比方講透:像一個負債的人,親近了國王、在國王左右供事,債主反過來恭敬供養他——王喻般若,負債人喻舍利。舍利本是宿世業因所成,該還的債本躲不過;正因般若薰修,那些宿命的對報、飢渴寒熱都近不了它,反倒得諸天世人供養。接著論主把般若的功德鋪成全品最華麗的一段——如意寶珠喻。世間那顆無價摩尼寶,無心無識,卻能除四百四病、破黑闇、除熱除冷、解蛇毒、令濁水澄清;般若也如是,能除八萬四千病,根本是貪、瞋、癡、等分四病,以不淨觀、慈悲心、觀因緣一一對治。論主更逐重細辨:珠只能治肉眼,般若能治慧眼;珠治了肉眼,後病還會復發,般若治慧眼,畢竟清淨——珠的功德止於一隅,般若的功德通於究竟。一顆無記色法的寶珠尚且如此,何況般若是無上智慧、諸佛之母、諸法寶中的第一寶。

品的下半,帝釋換了個問法:什麼是有為法相、什麼是無為法相?佛答:內空乃至十八不共法中的智慧,是有為諸法相;無生無滅、無垢無淨、無增無減的「諸法自性」,是無為諸法相——而這兩種法相,都在般若波羅蜜裡攝盡,有為是修行的所行處,無為是所依止處。順著這個「攝一切法」,佛講出般若統攝六度的要義:菩薩行布施、持戒乃至觀諸法時,都以「般若波羅蜜為作明導」,才能各各具足成波羅蜜。就像閻浮提上的樹,葉、華、果、色各各不同,可它們的蔭卻無差別;諸波羅蜜入了般若、到了薩婆若,也一味無差別。論主還補兩個警策的喻:鹽是眾味之主,可愚人聽說便純食鹽,反而失味致患——只行般若而不與五度和合,也一樣墮邪見、不能增進善法,雖說眾行和合、般若為主,卻不可獨行;又像阿那婆達多池的四大河,一入大海就失了本名、合為一味,布施等離開般若則種種差別,入了般若則一相無別。

全品收在一個看似冒犯、實則最深的抉擇上。帝釋問:自己書寫供養般若經卷,與把經卷施給別人令他修學,哪一個福多?佛不直答,反用舍利設問:自己供養舍利,與分一粒芥子大的舍利施人令供養,哪個福多?帝釋答:分與他人令供養的福更多——論主點破:因為「以無吾我、慈悲心與故」。獨自讀誦或許還帶著我心,功德便小;以經卷施人、為人廣解其義,是替人作成佛的因緣,無吾我,功德就大。有人再追一句:福德既在心,佛何必碎身如芥子令人供養?答得極穩:信淨的心從兩個因緣生——內有正憶念,外有良福田;好穀子還要落在良田裡,才收得多;心雖好,也必得因著舍利,然後成大果報。最後佛自證般若為勝:三世聖人都從這裡學成聖道,連佛自己也是以此法得成無上聖、如今還回頭師仰此法。一場舍利與般若的天秤,秤到最後,秤出的是一句話——「般若是菩薩根本因緣,菩薩是諸佛根本因緣,諸佛是一切世間大利益安樂因緣」。舍利可敬,因它是般若所薰;佛可敬,因佛是般若所生。取般若、供養般若,從來不是不敬佛——敬那生佛、教佛的本源,正是最深的敬佛。這就是校量舍利品的心。

In this chapter the Buddha sets a hard problem on the scales. He asks Śakra: put the Buddha's relics filling Jambudvīpa on one side, and one written scroll of prajñāpāramitā on the other; of these two portions, which do you take? Śakra answers without the least hesitation: I would rather take the scroll of prajñā. It is not that he does not revere the relics; he says plainly that making offerings even to a relic the size of a mustard seed brings merit immeasurable and boundless. It is only that he sees one layer deeper: the relics are honoured because they ‘are born from prajñāpāramitā and are perfumed and cultivated by prajñāpāramitā’, and only therefore receive people's offerings. The relics are the fruit; prajñā is the root that perfumes them and brings them to be. To take prajñā is to take that from which the relics are born. This one weighing, one question, and one choice are the backbone of the whole chapter: the four Chinese characters rendered here as ‘weighing the relics’ weigh precisely which of relics and prajñā is root and which is branch.

Yet Śāriputra puts in a pointed challenge from the side: prajñā cannot be taken—it is without form, without shape, without resistance, only one mark, namely the signless; how can you ‘take’ it? Śakra's answer is fine: it is precisely because ‘prajñāpāramitā does not practise dual dharmas; the mark of non-dual dharmas is prajñāpāramitā’. What he takes is not some thing possessed of marks; what he takes is that prajñā which falls on neither side, without duality and without discrimination; it is for the benefit of those who have newly aroused the mind that he speaks, following worldly truth, of a ‘taking’. The Buddha hears this and praises him again and again, and pushes it one step deeper for him: the nature of dharmas and prajñā are without duality and without difference; the limit of reality and the nature of the inconceivable are likewise without duality and without difference from prajñā. Since prajñā is without mark and without appearance, without speech and without utterance, when the mind of one who receives and upholds it enters deeply, he ‘does not see any mark to be feared’—there is no mark there that could be feared. Śakra also offers an intimate comparison: he customarily sits in the Hall of Good Dharma, and even when he is not in his seat the gods pay homage to his empty seat and depart; in the same way, wherever a scroll of prajñā is, the gods, nāgas, and yakṣas of the ten directions come to pay homage and make offerings—because to see prajñā is no different from seeing the Buddha, since ‘prajñāpāramitā and the Buddha are without duality and without difference’. So the Buddha loads the scales heavier and heavier: from filling Jambudvīpa, to the three-thousand great-thousand world, and then to relics filling worlds as many as the sands of the Ganges; through three rounds of weighing Śakra takes prajñā alone, in a single taste.

Why are the relics honoured only in dependence on prajñā? The treatise-author explains it through the most down-to-earth comparison: it is like a debtor who draws near to the king and serves at the king's side, so that his creditors, reversing themselves, pay him reverence and make him offerings—the king is a simile for prajñā, the debtor for the relics. The relics were originally formed by the karmic causes of past lives, and the debts that must be repaid cannot be escaped; it is precisely because prajñā has perfumed and cultivated them that those retributions of past lives, hunger and thirst, cold and heat, cannot come near them, and instead they receive the offerings of gods and humans. Then the treatise-author spreads out the merits of prajñā in the most splendid passage of the whole chapter: the simile of the wish-fulfilling jewel. That priceless maṇi jewel of the world, having neither mind nor consciousness, can yet remove the four hundred and four sicknesses, break the darkness, remove heat and remove cold, dissolve snake-poison, and make muddy water clear; prajñā is likewise: it can remove the eighty-four thousand sicknesses, whose roots are the four sicknesses of greed, hatred, delusion, and their equal mixture, curing them one by one with the contemplation of impurity, the mind of kindness and compassion, and the contemplation of causes and conditions. The treatise-author goes on to distinguish it layer by layer: the jewel can heal only the fleshly eye, while prajñā can heal the wisdom-eye; when the jewel has healed the fleshly eye the sickness will later recur, but when prajñā heals the wisdom-eye it is ultimately pure—the merit of the jewel stops at one corner, while the merit of prajñā reaches through to the ultimate. If a jewel that is an indeterminate form-dharma is already like this, how much more prajñā, which is the unsurpassed wisdom, the mother of the buddhas, the first jewel among all the jewels of the Dharma.

In the lower half of the chapter Śakra changes his manner of asking: what is the mark of conditioned dharmas, and what the mark of unconditioned dharmas? The Buddha answers: the wisdom within inner emptiness and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas is the mark of conditioned dharmas; the ‘self-nature of dharmas’, which is without arising and without ceasing, without stain and without purity, without increase and without decrease, is the mark of unconditioned dharmas—and both of these marks of dharmas are wholly gathered within prajñāpāramitā: the conditioned is the place where practice moves, the unconditioned the place on which it relies. Following this ‘gathering of all dharmas’, the Buddha sets out the essential meaning of prajñā governing the six perfections: when a bodhisattva practises giving, upholds morality, and so on up to contemplating all dharmas, it is by having ‘prajñāpāramitā act as the bright guide’ that each can be fully accomplished as a perfection. It is like the trees of Jambudvīpa: their leaves, flowers, fruits, and colours each differ, yet their shade is without difference; when the perfections enter prajñā and reach sarvajñā, they too are of one taste, without difference. The treatise-author adds two cautionary similes: salt is the master of all flavours, yet a fool who hears this and eats salt alone loses the flavour and brings on sickness instead—to practise prajñā alone without joining it with the other five perfections is likewise to fall into wrong view and be unable to advance in wholesome dharmas; although it is said that all practices join together with prajñā as their master, it must not be practised alone. Again, it is like the four great rivers of Lake Anavatapta: once they enter the great sea they lose their own names and merge into one taste; giving and the rest, apart from prajñā, are variously different, but once they enter prajñā they are of one mark without difference.

The whole chapter closes on a choice that looks like an offence yet is the deepest of all. Śakra asks: to write out and make offerings to a scroll of prajñā oneself, or to give the scroll to another so that he may practise and learn—which merit is greater? The Buddha does not answer directly, but sets a question in turn using the relics: to make offerings to the relics oneself, or to divide off a relic the size of a mustard seed and give it to someone so that he may make offerings—which merit is greater? Śakra answers: the merit of dividing it and giving it to another to make offerings is greater—and the treatise-author lays bare the reason: because ‘it is given without any self and with a mind of kindness and compassion’. Reading and reciting alone may still carry the mind of self, and the merit is then small; to give the scroll to others and explain its meaning to them at length is to become for them the cause and condition of becoming a buddha; being without self, the merit is great. Someone presses one question further: since merit lies in the mind, why did the Buddha break his body into pieces the size of mustard seeds for people to make offerings to? The answer is entirely steady: a mind of pure faith is born from two causes and conditions—inwardly there is right recollection, outwardly there is a good field of merit; even good grain must fall into a good field before the harvest is great; though the mind be good, it must still rely on the relics before it brings forth the great result. Finally the Buddha himself bears witness that prajñā is supreme: the sages of the three times all learned the holy path from this, and he himself, having attained by this Dharma the unsurpassed holy state, now still turns back to honour this Dharma as his teacher. A weighing of relics against prajñā, weighed to the very end, weighs out a single sentence—‘prajñā is the root cause and condition of the bodhisattvas; the bodhisattvas are the root cause and condition of the buddhas; the buddhas are the cause and condition of great benefit and ease for all the world’. The relics are venerable because they are what prajñā has perfumed; the Buddha is venerable because he is what prajñā has given birth to. To take prajñā and make offerings to prajñā has never been a failure to revere the Buddha—to revere the source that gives birth to the Buddha and teaches the Buddha is precisely the deepest reverence for the Buddha. This is the heart of the chapter on weighing the relics.

原典Canonical · verbatim

卷59 〔T25 0475b02〕

大智度論釋校量舍利品第三十七 聖者龍樹造 後秦龜茲國三藏鳩摩羅什譯 【經】 佛告釋提桓因言:「憍尸迦!若滿閻浮提佛舍利作一分,復有人書般若波羅蜜經卷作一分,二分之中,汝取何所?」 釋提桓因白佛言:「世尊!若滿閻浮提佛舍利作一分,般若波羅蜜經卷作一分,二分之中,我寧取般若波羅蜜經卷。何以故?世尊!我於佛舍利非不恭敬,非不尊重;以舍利從般若波羅蜜中生、般若波羅蜜薰修故,是舍利得供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎。」 爾時,舍利弗問釋提桓因:「憍尸迦!是般若波羅蜜,不可取,無色、無形、無對,一相,所謂無相,汝云何欲取?何以故?是般若波羅蜜,不為取故出,不為捨故出,不為增減、聚散、損益、垢淨故出。是般若波羅蜜,不與諸佛法,不捨凡人法;不與辟支佛法、阿羅漢法、學法,不捨凡人法;不與無為性,不捨有為性;不與內空乃至無法有法空,不與四念處乃至一切種智,不捨凡人法。」 釋提桓因語舍利弗:「如是!如是!舍利弗!若有人知是般若波羅蜜不與諸佛法、不捨凡人法,乃至不與一切種智、不捨凡人法;是菩薩摩訶薩能行般若波羅蜜,能修般若波羅蜜。何以故?般若波羅蜜不行二法故,不二法相是般若波羅蜜,不二法相是禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜。」 爾時,佛讚釋提桓〔T25 0475c〕因言:「善哉!善哉!憍尸迦!如汝所說,般若波羅蜜不行二法故,不二法相是般若波羅蜜,不二法相是禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜。憍尸迦!若人欲得法性二相者,是人為欲得般若波羅蜜二相。何以故?憍尸迦!法性、般若波羅蜜,無二無別。乃至檀波羅蜜亦如是。若人欲得實際、不可思議性二相者,是人為欲得般若波羅蜜二相。何以故?般若波羅蜜、不可思議性,無二無別。」 釋提桓因白佛言:「世尊!一切世間人及諸天、阿修羅,應禮拜、供養般若波羅蜜!何以故?諸菩薩摩訶薩,般若波羅蜜中學,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。世尊!我常在善法堂上坐,我若不在坐時,諸天子來供養我故,為我坐處作禮,遶竟還去。諸天子作是念:『釋提桓因在是處坐,為諸三十三天說法故。』如是,世尊!在所處書是般若波羅蜜經卷,受持、讀、誦、為他演說;是處,十方世界中,諸天、龍、夜叉、揵闥婆、阿修羅、迦樓羅、緊那羅、摩睺羅伽皆來禮拜般若波羅蜜,供養已去。何以故?是般若波羅蜜中生諸佛及一切眾生樂具故,諸佛舍利亦是一切種智住處因緣。以是故,世尊!二分中,我取般若波羅蜜。 「復次,世尊!我若受持、讀、誦般若波羅蜜,心深入法中,我是時不見怖畏相。何以故?世尊!是般若波羅蜜無相無貌、無言無說。世尊!無相無貌、無言無說,是般若波羅蜜,乃至是一切種智。世尊!般若波羅蜜若當有相、非無相者,諸佛不應知一切法無相無貌、無言無說,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,為弟子說諸法無相無貌、無言無〔T25 0476a〕說。世尊!用般若波羅蜜實是無相無貌、無言無說故,諸佛知一切諸法無相無貌、無言無說,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提;為弟子說諸法亦無相無貌、無言無說。以是故,世尊!是般若波羅蜜,一切世間諸天、人、阿修羅應供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎,華香、瓔珞乃至幡蓋。 「復次,世尊!若有人受持般若波羅蜜,親近、讀、誦、說、正憶念及書寫、供養華香乃至幡蓋,是人不墮地獄、畜生、餓鬼道中,不墮聲聞、辟支佛地;乃至得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,常見諸佛;從一佛界至一佛界,供養諸佛,恭敬、尊重、讚歎,華香乃至幡蓋。 「復次,世尊!滿三千大千世界佛舍利作一分,書般若波羅蜜經卷作一分,是二分中,我故取般若波羅蜜。何以故?世尊!是般若波羅蜜中生諸佛舍利;以是故,舍利得供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎。是善男子、善女人供養、恭敬舍利故,受天上、人中福樂,常不墮三惡道;如所願,漸以三乘法入涅槃。是故,世尊!若有見現在佛、若見般若波羅蜜經卷,等無異。何以故?世尊!是般若波羅蜜與佛無二無別故。」 【論】 問曰: 上以起七寶塔校供養般若波羅蜜,義已具足,今佛何以以舍利、經卷對校? 答曰: 先明七寶塔是舍利住處,今但明舍利以對經卷。舍利雖不及般若,而滿閻浮提;般若妙故,但明經卷。 復次,出家人多貪智慧,智慧是解脫因緣故;在家人多貪福德,福德是樂因緣故。出家人多貪意識所知物,在家人多貪五識所知物。釋提桓因已證福樂果報最大,於在家人中最為尊勝;以〔T25 0476b〕是故,佛問釋提桓因。 釋提桓因言:「我於二分中,取般若波羅蜜經卷。」 此中自說因緣:「世尊!我不敢輕慢、不恭敬舍利,我知供養芥子許舍利,功德無量無邊,乃至得佛功德不盡,何況滿閻浮提!世尊!菩薩受身便有舍利,人所不貴;得成佛時,舍利以般若熏修故,人所恭敬、尊重、供養。是故二分中,我取勝者。」 問曰: 舍利弗知釋提桓因以世諦故言取般若波羅蜜,何以故難? 答曰: 釋提桓因在家中,為煩惱所縛、五欲所覆,而能說般若波羅蜜,是事希有!以是故,舍利弗質問,欲令釋提桓因更問佛深義,故難。 釋提桓因順舍利弗意,答言:「如是!」 釋提桓因意:於一切法中無二相,不以舍利為小、不以般若波羅蜜為大。般若波羅蜜,無二、無分別相;為利益新發意菩薩故,致以世諦如是說:「般若波羅蜜,能令眾生心無二無分別;以是利益故,我取般若。」 是時,佛讚釋提桓因:「善哉!善哉!」以能分別諸法,亦能善說般若相故,所謂無二相,是故讚歎。 佛此中自說譬喻:「若人欲分別法性、實際等作二分,是人為欲分別般若波羅蜜作二分。」 帝釋自說般若,又聞佛重說,其心清淨,深信歡喜,言一切世間所應禮敬。 帝釋此中自說因緣:「一切菩薩學是般若,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。」 又此中以己身為喻,己身喻佛,般若經卷喻坐處。 有人言:己身喻般若,坐處喻舍利。 「是故二分中,我取般若。」 「復次,世尊!我若受持般若,讀、誦,是時乃至不〔T25 0476c〕見怖畏相,何況實怖畏!所以者何?一切諸法無相、無言無說故。般若波羅蜜,能令人得是無相法,故無所畏。」 受持供養般若者,不墮三惡趣及二乘道,世世不離諸佛,常供養十方諸佛。是故般若波羅蜜,一切世間所應供養。 復次,佛開其初,以舍利滿閻浮提。帝釋既悟二事勝負,為一切眾生故,廣增至三千大千世界;此中自說因緣:「見般若波羅蜜,與見佛無異。」 【經】 「復次,世尊!如佛住三事示現,說十二部經:修多羅、祇夜乃至優婆提舍;復有善男子、善女人受持、誦、說是般若波羅蜜,等無異。何以故?世尊!是般若波羅蜜中,生三事示現及十二部經:修多羅乃至優波提舍故。 「復次,世尊!十方諸佛住三事示現,說十二部經:脩多羅乃至優波提舍;復有人受般若波羅蜜,為他人說,等無異。何以故?般若波羅蜜中生諸佛,亦生十二部經:修多羅乃至優波提舍。 「復次,世尊!若有供養十方如恒河沙等世界中諸佛,恭敬、尊重、讚歎,華香乃至幡蓋;復有人書般若波羅蜜經卷,恭敬、尊重、讚歎,華香乃至幡蓋,其福正等。何以故?十方諸佛皆從般若波羅蜜中生。 「復次,世尊!善男子、善女人聞是般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦、正憶念,亦為他人說,是人不墮地獄道、畜生、餓鬼道,亦不墮聲聞、辟支佛地。何以故?當知是善男子、善女人正住阿鞞跋致地中故。是般若波羅蜜遠離一切苦惱、衰病。 「復次,世尊!若有善男子、善女人書是般若波羅蜜經卷,受持、親近、供養、〔T25 0477a〕恭敬、尊重、讚歎,是人離諸恐怖。世尊!譬如負債人親近國王,供給左右,債主反更供養、恭敬是人,是人不復畏怖。何以故?世尊!此人依近國王,憑恃有力故。如是,世尊!諸佛舍利,是般若波羅蜜薰修故,得供養、恭敬。世尊!當知般若波羅蜜如王,舍利如負債人;負債人依王故得供養,舍利亦依般若波羅蜜修薰故得供養。世尊!當知諸佛一切種智亦從般若波羅蜜修薰故得成就。以是故,世尊!二分中,我取般若波羅蜜。何以故?世尊!般若波羅蜜中生諸佛舍利、三十二相;般若波羅蜜中,亦生佛十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、大慈大悲。世尊!般若波羅蜜中生五波羅蜜,使得波羅蜜名字;般若波羅蜜中生諸佛一切種智。 「復次,世尊!所在三千大千世界中,若有受持、供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎般若波羅蜜,是處,若人、若非人不能得其便,是人漸漸得入涅槃。世尊!般若波羅蜜為大利益如是,於三千大千世界中能作佛事!世尊!所在處,有般若波羅蜜,則為有佛。世尊!譬如無價摩尼寶,在所住處,非人不得其便。若男子、若女人有熱病,以是珠著身上,熱病即時除差;若有風病、若有冷病、若有雜熱風冷病,以珠著身上,皆悉除愈。若闇中,是寶能令明。熱時能令涼,寒時能令溫;珠所住處,其地不寒、不熱,時節和適。其處亦無諸餘毒螫;若男子、女人,為毒蛇所螫,以珠示之,毒即除滅。 「復次,世尊!若男子、女人眼痛、膚曀、盲瞽,以珠示之,即時除愈。若有癩瘡〔T25 0477b〕惡腫,以珠著其身上,病即除愈。 「復次,世尊!是摩尼寶所在水中,水隨作一色:若以青物裹著水中,水色即為青;若黃、赤、白、紅、縹物裹著水中,水隨作黃、赤、白、紅、縹色。如是等種種色物裹著水中,水隨作種種色。世尊!若水濁,以珠著中,水即為清,是珠其德如是!」 爾時,阿難問釋提桓因言:「憍尸迦!是摩尼寶,為是天上寶?為是閻浮提寶?」 釋提桓因語阿難:「是天上寶。閻浮提人亦有是寶,但功德相少不具足;天上寶清淨輕妙,不可以譬喻為比。 「復次,世尊!是摩尼寶,若著篋中,舉珠出,其功德薰篋故,人皆愛敬。如是,世尊!在所住處,有書般若波羅蜜經卷,是處則無眾惱之患,亦如摩尼寶所著處,則無眾難。世尊!佛般泥洹後,舍利得供養,皆般若波羅蜜力;禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜,內空乃至無法有法空,四念處乃至十八不共法,一切智,法相、法住、法位、法性、實際、不可思議性,一切種智,是諸功德力。善男子、善女人作是念:『是佛舍利,一切智、一切種智、大慈大悲、斷一切結使及習、常捨行、不錯謬法等諸佛功德住處。』以是故,舍利得供養。世尊!舍利是諸功德寶波羅蜜住處、不垢不淨波羅蜜住處,不生不滅波羅蜜、不入不出波羅蜜、不增不損波羅蜜、不來不去不住波羅蜜,是佛舍利是諸法相波羅蜜住處;以是諸法相波羅蜜薰修故,舍利得供養。 「復次,世尊!置三千大千世界滿中舍利。如恒河沙等諸世界滿其中舍利作一分,有人書般若波羅蜜經卷作一分,二分之〔T25 0477c〕中,我取般若波羅蜜。何以故?是般若波羅蜜中,生諸佛舍利;是般若波羅蜜修薰故,舍利得供養。世尊!若有善男子、善女人供養舍利,恭敬、尊重、讚歎,其功德報不可得邊,受人中、天上福樂,所謂剎利大姓、婆羅門大姓、居士大家、四天王天處乃至他化自在天中受福樂;亦以是福德因緣故,當得盡苦。若受是般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、說、正憶念,是人能具足禪波羅蜜乃至能具足檀波羅蜜,能具足四念處乃至能具足十八不共法;過聲聞、辟支佛地,住菩薩位;住菩薩位已,得菩薩神通,從一佛界至一佛界;是菩薩為眾生故受身,隨其所應,成就眾生:若作轉輪聖王、若作剎利大姓、若作婆羅門大姓,成就眾生。以是故,世尊!我不為輕慢、不恭敬故不取舍利,以善男子、善女人供養般若波羅蜜則為供養舍利故。 「復次,世尊!有人欲見十方無量阿僧祇諸世界中現在諸佛法身、色身,是人應聞受持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、正憶念、為他人廣說。如是善男子、善女人當見十方無量阿僧祇世界中諸佛法身、色身。是善男子、善女人行般若波羅蜜,亦應以法相修念佛三昧。復次,善男子、善女人欲見現在諸佛,應當受是般若波羅蜜,乃至正憶念。」 【論】 復次,「佛住三事示現,說十二部經」者。 問曰: 一切說法人中,無與佛等者;佛說十二部經,則無不備具,云何善男子但受持讀誦般若,與佛等無異? 答曰: 此中佛欲稱歎般若為大故。於十二部經中,般若為最〔T25 0478a〕勝。所以者何?說是般若波羅蜜,多有發菩薩心;說十二部經,雜發三乘意故。不以菩薩功德比佛無量身,此說法身。菩薩但說般若,勸導大乘;佛雜說,勸導三乘,故等無異。 復次,三事示現及十二部經根本者,所謂「般若波羅蜜」是。 供養十方如恒河沙等諸佛,若復有供養般若經卷,亦等無異。 此中佛說般若所以福德勝因緣,所謂般若能破一切苦惱、衰病、怖畏等。如負債人依王,王喻般若,負債人喻舍利。舍利是先世業因緣所成,因緣中應償諸對;以般若波羅蜜薰修故,宿命因緣諸對及飢渴寒熱所不能得,而得諸天世人所見供養。如負債人依王,反為債主所敬。 先說無諸衰病及怖畏,以明內;今說摩尼寶,人、非人不得其便,以明外。是人供養般若波羅蜜故,若今世、若後世,若身衰心病,盡皆能除;諸善願事,隨意能與。 得是般若波羅蜜大寶故,無諸怖畏、無所乏短;譬如無價寶珠,所願皆得。 問曰: 摩尼寶珠,於頗梨、金、銀,車𤦲、馬瑙、琉璃、珊瑚、琥珀、金剛等中,是何等寶? 答曰: 有人言:此寶珠從龍王腦中出,人得此珠,毒不能害、入火不能燒,有如是等功德。 有人言:是帝釋所執金剛,用與阿修羅鬪時,碎落閻浮提。 有人言:諸過去久遠佛舍利,法既滅盡,舍利變成此珠,以益眾生。 有人言:眾生福德因緣故,自然有此珠。譬如罪因緣故,地獄中自然有治罪之器。 此寶珠名如意,無有定色,清徹輕妙,四天下物,皆〔T25 0478b〕悉照現。如意珠義,如先說。是寶常能出一切寶物,衣服、飲食,隨意所欲,盡能與之;亦能除諸衰惱病苦等。 是寶珠有二種:有天上如意寶,有人間如意寶。諸天福德厚故,珠德具足;人福德薄故,珠德不具足。 是珠所著房舍、函篋之中,其處亦有威德。 「般若波羅蜜亦如是」者。 如如意寶珠能與在家人今世富樂,隨意所欲;般若波羅蜜能與出家求道人三乘解脫樂,隨意所願。 如意寶珠在所著處,非人不得其便;般若波羅蜜亦如是,行者心與相應,惡邪羅剎不能入其心中沮壞道意、奪智慧命。復次,般若波羅蜜所在處,魔、若魔民、地神、夜叉、諸惡鬼等不能得便。 如寶珠能除四百四病,根本四病:風、熱、冷、雜;般若波羅蜜亦能除八萬四千病,根本四病:貪、瞋、癡、等分。婬欲病分二萬一千,瞋恚病分二萬一千,愚癡病分二萬一千,等分病分二萬一千。以不淨觀除貪欲,以慈悲心除瞋恚,以觀因緣除愚癡,總上三藥或不淨、或慈悲、或觀因緣除等分病。 如寶珠能除黑闇;般若亦如是,能除三界黑闇。 如寶珠能除熱;般若亦如是,能除婬欲、瞋恚熱。 如寶珠能除冷;般若亦如是,能除無明、不信、不恭敬、懈怠等冷心。 日月皆諸寶所成,日能作熱,月能作冷,雖俱利益眾生,以不能兼故,不名為如意。 寶珠所在處,毒蛇等諸惡蟲所不能害;般若亦如是,貪欲等毒所不能病。 若有人毒蛇所螫,持寶珠示之,即時除愈;有人為貪欲等毒蛇〔T25 0478c〕所螫,得般若波羅蜜,貪恚毒即除,如難陀、鴦群梨摩羅等。 有人眼痛盲瞽,以寶珠示之,即時除愈;般若波羅蜜亦如是,有人以無明、疑悔、顛倒邪見等破慧眼,得般若即時明了。 如人癩瘡癰腫,以寶珠示之,即時除愈;般若亦如是,五逆癩罪等,得般若即時消滅。 如以種種色裹寶珠,著水中隨作一色;般若亦如是,行者得般若力故,心則柔軟,無所著,隨信手五根等,亦隨順四禪、四無量心、背捨、勝處及一切入。復次,於須陀洹、斯陀含、阿那含、阿羅漢、辟支佛地,隨順遍學,無所違逆。第六縹色者,是虛空色。行者得般若觀諸法空,心亦隨順不著。如是等種種者,入一切諸法,皆隨順無礙。 如水渾濁,雜色不淨,以珠著中,皆清淨一色;般若亦如是,人有種種煩惱、邪見、戲論,擾心渾濁,得般若則清淨一色。 如如意珠有無量功德,般若功德亦如是。 今當別相說般若功德:是如意珠,但能除惡鬼,不能壞魔天;般若則能除二事。珠能治身病;般若能治身、心病。珠能治人、神所治病;般若能治一切天、龍、鬼神所不能治病。珠能治世世曾所治病;般若能治無始世界來未曾所治病。如是等種種差別。 珠能照所住處夜闇;般若能照一切煩惱相應無明黑闇,及不共無明一切法中不了癡黑闇。 珠但能破所住處熱,不能破餘處熱;般若力,乃至無量世界劫盡大火,一吹能滅,何況一處熱! 珠但能除形質火、日之熱;般若能除三毒心熱。 珠能〔T25 0479a〕除風雨、寒雪;般若能除十方無量世界眾生不信、不恭敬、懈怠心等寒。 珠能却外毒螫,不能除四大毒蛇;般若能畢竟除此二種毒。 珠不能治邪見毒;般若能除。 珠能治肉眼;般若能治慧眼。 珠能治近見眼;般若能治遠見眼。 珠能治肉眼,肉眼不作珠;般若能治慧眼,慧眼即作般若。 珠能治肉眼,後病復發;般若治慧眼,畢竟清淨。 珠能治癩瘡惡腫;般若能治身癩、心癩。 問曰: 四種病中,攝一切病,何以故別說「眼痛」、「癩病」等? 答曰: 眼是身中第一,所用最貴,是故別說。諸病中癩病最重,宿命罪因緣故難治,是故更說。 珠能令水隨所裹色;般若能隨順心數善法。 珠不能轉人心;般若能轉一切眾生心性所樂所欲。 珠能令所著處濁水清,非一切水;般若力能令六覺濁心即時清淨;又於諸龍王、鬼神王、人王等貪恚濁心,能令清淨。 珠能使所著凾篋、房舍有威德;般若力能度十方無量世界阿僧祇眾生,令有威德。 珠功德力入函篋,凾篋不能與人隨意功德;舍利得般若薰修故,有人供養,必還得般若而得成佛。 是凾篋,凡夫之人所貴;舍利,凡夫、聖人所貴。 凾篋,世間受樂人所貴;舍利,出世間、世間受樂人所貴。 般若是如意寶珠,凾篋是舍利;舍利中雖無般若,般若所薰故得供養。 復次,諸聖法中,般若第一,無可譬喻;以世間人貴是寶珠故,以珠為喻。 人見如意寶珠,所願皆得;若見珠所住處,亦得少願。行者亦如是,得〔T25 0479b〕是般若波羅蜜義,即入佛道;若見般若所住舍利供養故,得今世、後世無量福樂,久必得道。 如是總相、別相,應當知。 問曰: 般若若有如是功德者,何以故說「舍利是五波羅蜜乃至一切種智所住處故得供養」? 答曰: 先已說:一切諸法,般若波羅蜜為首、為明導;譬如王來必有將從,但舉其主名,餘者已盡得。 讚般若波羅蜜,是義先已說。

The canonical text stands in Chinese only. This edition renders the essence, the plain reading, the exposition and the apparatus into English — never the sūtra itself. Switch to 漢讀本 or 並行雙語 above to read it.

白話Plain reading

舍利與般若經卷二分,帝釋取般若:舍利從般若中生

佛告訴釋提桓因(帝釋)說:『憍尸迦(帝釋的別稱)!若把充滿閻浮提(我們所住的這片大洲)的佛舍利作一分,又有人書寫的般若波羅蜜經卷作一分,這兩分之中,你取哪一分?』

釋提桓因向佛稟白:『世尊!若把充滿閻浮提的佛舍利作一分,般若波羅蜜經卷作一分,這兩分之中,我寧可取般若波羅蜜經卷。為什麼呢?世尊!我對於佛舍利並非不恭敬、並非不尊重;只因舍利是從般若波羅蜜中生、是被般若波羅蜜薰習修成的緣故,這舍利才得到供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎。』

那時,舍利弗問釋提桓因:『憍尸迦!這般若波羅蜜不可取,它無色、無形、無對(沒有相對待的境),只有一相,也就是無相,你為什麼還要取它呢?為什麼這樣說?因為這般若波羅蜜,不是為了取而出現,不是為了捨而出現,不是為了增、減、聚、散、損、益、垢、淨而出現。這般若波羅蜜,不給與諸佛之法,也不捨離凡夫之法;不給與辟支佛法、阿羅漢法、有學之法,也不捨離凡夫之法;不給與無為之性,也不捨離有為之性;不給與內空乃至無法有法空,不給與四念處乃至一切種智,也不捨離凡夫之法。』

釋提桓因回答舍利弗:『正是如此!正是如此!舍利弗!若有人了知這般若波羅蜜不給與諸佛之法、不捨離凡夫之法,乃至不給與一切種智、不捨離凡夫之法;這樣的菩薩摩訶薩就能行般若波羅蜜、能修般若波羅蜜。為什麼呢?因為般若波羅蜜不落在「二法」上,不二的法相就是般若波羅蜜,不二的法相就是禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜(布施度)。』

那時,佛稱讚釋提桓因說:『很好!很好!憍尸迦!正如你所說,般若波羅蜜不落在二法上,所以不二的法相就是般若波羅蜜,不二的法相就是禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜。憍尸迦!若有人想要得到『法性的二相』,這人就是想要得到般若波羅蜜的二相。為什麼呢?憍尸迦!法性與般若波羅蜜,無二無別;乃至檀波羅蜜也是這樣。若有人想要得到『實際、不可思議性的二相』,這人就是想要得到般若波羅蜜的二相。為什麼呢?因為般若波羅蜜與不可思議性,無二無別。』

釋提桓因向佛稟白:『世尊!一切世間的人以及諸天、阿修羅,都應當禮拜、供養般若波羅蜜!為什麼呢?因為諸菩薩摩訶薩,是在般若波羅蜜中修學,才得到阿耨多羅三藐三菩提(無上正等正覺)。世尊!我常在善法堂上安坐,我若不在座位上時,諸天子為了供養我的緣故,就向我的座位作禮,繞行完畢才離去。諸天子起這樣的念頭:『釋提桓因就在這座位上坐,為三十三天說法。』就像這樣,世尊!凡是書寫這般若波羅蜜經卷、受持、讀、誦、為他人演說的地方,這地方,十方世界中的諸天、龍、夜叉、揵闥婆、阿修羅、迦樓羅、緊那羅、摩睺羅伽都來禮拜般若波羅蜜,供養完了才離去。為什麼呢?因為這般若波羅蜜中,生出諸佛以及一切眾生的安樂資具,諸佛舍利也是一切種智所住之處的因緣。因為這個緣故,世尊!這兩分之中,我取般若波羅蜜。

『再者,世尊!我若受持、讀、誦般若波羅蜜,心深入於法中,我這時就不見任何怖畏之相。為什麼呢?世尊!這般若波羅蜜無相無貌、無言無說。世尊!無相無貌、無言無說,就是般若波羅蜜,乃至就是一切種智。世尊!般若波羅蜜若當真有相、不是無相的話,那諸佛就不應知道「一切法無相無貌、無言無說」而得到阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,也不應為弟子宣說「諸法無相無貌、無言無說」。世尊!正因為般若波羅蜜實在是無相無貌、無言無說的緣故,諸佛才知道一切諸法無相無貌、無言無說,得到阿耨多羅三藐三菩提;也才為弟子宣說諸法同樣無相無貌、無言無說。因為這個緣故,世尊!這般若波羅蜜,一切世間的諸天、人、阿修羅都應當供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎,用華香、瓔珞乃至幡蓋。

『再者,世尊!若有人受持般若波羅蜜,親近、讀、誦、講說、正憶念以及書寫、供養華香乃至幡蓋,這人就不墮地獄、畜生、餓鬼道中,不墮聲聞、辟支佛地;乃至得到阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,常見諸佛;從這一佛國到那一佛國,供養諸佛,恭敬、尊重、讚歎,用華香乃至幡蓋。

『再者,世尊!把充滿三千大千世界的佛舍利作一分,書寫的般若波羅蜜經卷作一分,這兩分之中,我仍舊取般若波羅蜜。為什麼呢?世尊!因為這般若波羅蜜中生出諸佛舍利;因為這個緣故,舍利才得到供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎。這善男子、善女人因為供養、恭敬舍利的緣故,領受天上、人間的福樂,常不墮三惡道;隨其所願,漸漸以三乘之法入涅槃。所以,世尊!若有人見現在佛、或見般若波羅蜜經卷,二者平等沒有差別。為什麼呢?世尊!因為這般若波羅蜜與佛無二無別的緣故。』

以下是論釋。

論①:舍利對經卷校量,帝釋為在家最尊;不二法相義

有人問:上文已用起造七寶塔來校量供養般若波羅蜜,義理已經具足,如今佛為什麼還要用舍利、經卷來對校?

回答:先前是點明七寶塔為舍利的住處,如今只是單就舍利來對比經卷。舍利雖然比不上般若,卻能充滿閻浮提;般若既然殊妙,所以只點出經卷(以少勝多)。

再者,出家人多半貪求智慧,因為智慧是解脫的因緣;在家人多半貪求福德,因為福德是快樂的因緣。出家人多半貪求意識所了知的事物,在家人多半貪求五識所了知的事物。釋提桓因已經證得福樂的果報最為廣大,在在家人中最為尊勝;因為這個緣故,佛才問釋提桓因。

釋提桓因說:『我在這兩分之中,取般若波羅蜜經卷。』

這裡帝釋自己說出緣由:『世尊!我不敢輕慢、不恭敬舍利,我知道供養芥子那麼一點點的舍利,功德就無量無邊,乃至得佛的功德也享用不盡,何況是充滿閻浮提的舍利!世尊!菩薩受生之身便有舍利,但人並不看重;等到成佛時,舍利因為被般若薰習修成的緣故,才被人恭敬、尊重、供養。所以這兩分之中,我取那殊勝的一分。』

有人問:舍利弗明知釋提桓因是就世諦(世間共許的道理)而說「取般若波羅蜜」,為什麼還要質難?

回答:釋提桓因身在家中,被煩惱所繫縛、被五欲所覆蓋,卻能宣說般若波羅蜜,這是希有的事!因為這個緣故,舍利弗才質問,是想使釋提桓因進一步向佛請問更深的義理,所以質難。

釋提桓因順著舍利弗的意思,回答說:『正是如此!』

釋提桓因的用意是:在一切法之中並無二相,不把舍利看作小、不把般若波羅蜜看作大。般若波羅蜜,無二、無分別之相;只是為了利益新發意的菩薩,才就世諦這樣說:『般若波羅蜜,能使眾生的心無二無分別;因為這樣的利益,所以我取般若。』

這時,佛稱讚釋提桓因:『很好!很好!』因為帝釋既能分別諸法、又能善巧宣說般若之相,也就是那「無二相」,所以佛才讚歎。

佛在這裡自己說出譬喻:『若有人想要把法性、實際等分作二分,這人就是想要把般若波羅蜜分作二分。』

帝釋自己宣說了般若,又聽佛重複闡明,他的心清淨,深信歡喜,說:一切世間都應當禮敬般若。

帝釋在這裡自己說出緣由:『一切菩薩修學這般若,才得到阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。』

又在這裡以自己的身作譬喻:自身譬喻佛,般若經卷譬喻座位。

也有人說:自身譬喻般若,座位譬喻舍利。

『所以這兩分之中,我取般若。』

『再者,世尊!我若受持般若,讀、誦,這時連怖畏之相都不見,何況是實有的怖畏!為什麼呢?因為一切諸法無相、無言無說。般若波羅蜜,能使人得到這無相之法,所以無所畏懼。』

受持供養般若的人,不墮三惡趣以及二乘之道,世世不離諸佛,常供養十方諸佛。所以般若波羅蜜,是一切世間都應當供養的。

再者,佛先開了個頭,以充滿閻浮提的舍利為例。帝釋既已領悟這兩件事的勝負,為了一切眾生的緣故,就把範圍擴大到三千大千世界;這裡帝釋自己說出緣由:『見般若波羅蜜,與見佛沒有差別。』

經②:三事示現十二部經皆從般若生;負債依王喻;摩尼寶喻

『再者,世尊!如同佛以三事示現(神通、記心、教誡三種示導),宣說十二部經:修多羅、祇夜乃至優婆提舍;也有善男子、善女人受持、誦、講說這般若波羅蜜,二者平等沒有差別。為什麼呢?世尊!因為這般若波羅蜜中,生出三事示現以及十二部經:修多羅乃至優波提舍。

『再者,世尊!十方諸佛以三事示現,宣說十二部經:修多羅乃至優波提舍;也有人領受般若波羅蜜,為他人宣說,二者平等沒有差別。為什麼呢?因為般若波羅蜜中生出諸佛,也生出十二部經:修多羅乃至優波提舍。

『再者,世尊!若有人供養十方如恒河沙數那麼多世界中的諸佛,恭敬、尊重、讚歎,用華香乃至幡蓋;又有人書寫般若波羅蜜經卷,恭敬、尊重、讚歎,用華香乃至幡蓋,這兩者的福正相等。為什麼呢?因為十方諸佛都是從般若波羅蜜中生。

『再者,世尊!善男子、善女人聽聞這般若波羅蜜,受持、讀、誦、正憶念,也為他人宣說,這人就不墮地獄道、畜生、餓鬼道,也不墮聲聞、辟支佛地。為什麼呢?應當知道這善男子、善女人正安住於阿鞞跋致(不退轉)地中的緣故。這般若波羅蜜,遠離一切苦惱、衰病。

『再者,世尊!若有善男子、善女人書寫這般若波羅蜜經卷,受持、親近、供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎,這人便遠離一切恐怖。世尊!譬如負債的人親近國王,供給、隨侍在王的左右,債主反而更去供養、恭敬這人,這人就不再畏怖。為什麼呢?世尊!因為這人依傍、親近國王,倚仗著王有力量的緣故。就像這樣,世尊!諸佛舍利,因為被般若波羅蜜薰習修成的緣故,才得到供養、恭敬。世尊!應當知道般若波羅蜜就像國王,舍利就像負債的人;負債的人依傍國王才得供養,舍利也是依般若波羅蜜修薰才得供養。世尊!應當知道諸佛的一切種智,也是從般若波羅蜜修薰才得成就。因為這個緣故,世尊!這兩分之中,我取般若波羅蜜。為什麼呢?世尊!因為般若波羅蜜中生出諸佛舍利、三十二相;般若波羅蜜中,也生出佛的十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、大慈大悲。世尊!般若波羅蜜中生出五波羅蜜,使它們得到「波羅蜜」的名字;般若波羅蜜中生出諸佛的一切種智。

『再者,世尊!凡是三千大千世界中,若有人受持、供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎般若波羅蜜的地方,這地方,無論是人、是非人都不能得其方便(無隙可乘),這人便漸漸得入涅槃。世尊!般若波羅蜜有這樣大的利益,能在三千大千世界中作佛事!世尊!凡是有般若波羅蜜的地方,就等於有佛。世尊!譬如無價的摩尼寶,在它所住的地方,非人得不到方便。若有男子、若有女人得了熱病,把這珠放在身上,熱病立時就痊癒;若有風病、若有冷病、若有雜熱風冷病,把珠放在身上,也都痊癒。若在暗中,這寶能使其光明。熱時能使清涼,寒時能使溫暖;珠所住之處,那地方不寒、不熱,時節調和適宜。那地方也沒有種種餘毒螫害;若有男子、女人被毒蛇所螫,把珠給他看,毒立即消除。

『再者,世尊!若有男子、女人眼痛、眼生翳膜、盲瞎,把珠給他看,立時就痊癒。若有癩瘡、惡腫,把珠放在他身上,病立即痊癒。

『再者,世尊!這摩尼寶放在水中,水就隨著現出一種顏色:若用青色的東西裹著放在水中,水色就成青色;若用黃、赤、白、紅、縹(淺青色)的東西裹著放在水中,水就隨著現出黃、赤、白、紅、縹色。像這樣種種顏色的東西裹著放入水中,水就隨著現出種種顏色。世尊!若水混濁,把珠放進去,水立即變清,這珠的功德就是這樣!』

那時,阿難問釋提桓因:『憍尸迦!這摩尼寶,是天上的寶?還是閻浮提的寶?』

釋提桓因回答阿難:『是天上的寶。閻浮提人也有這種寶,只是功德相少而不具足;天上的寶清淨輕妙,不可用譬喻來比方。

『再者,世尊!這摩尼寶,若放在篋(小箱子)中,把珠取出後,因為它的功德薰染了篋的緣故,人都愛敬那篋。就像這樣,世尊!凡是有書寫的般若波羅蜜經卷所住之處,這地方就沒有眾多惱患,也如同摩尼寶所放之處,就沒有眾多災難。世尊!佛般泥洹(涅槃)以後,舍利之所以得到供養,全是般若波羅蜜的力量;禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜,內空乃至無法有法空,四念處乃至十八不共法,一切智,法相、法住、法位、法性、實際、不可思議性,一切種智,都是這諸功德的力量。善男子、善女人起這樣的念頭:『這佛舍利,是一切智、一切種智、大慈大悲、斷一切結使以及習氣、常捨行、不錯謬法等諸佛功德的住處。』因為這個緣故,舍利才得到供養。世尊!舍利是諸功德寶波羅蜜的住處、不垢不淨波羅蜜的住處,是不生不滅波羅蜜、不入不出波羅蜜、不增不損波羅蜜、不來不去不住波羅蜜的住處,這佛舍利是諸法相波羅蜜的住處;因為被這諸法相波羅蜜薰習修成的緣故,舍利才得到供養。

『再者,世尊!放著充滿三千大千世界的舍利。若把如恒河沙數那麼多世界所充滿的舍利作一分,有人書寫的般若波羅蜜經卷作一分,這兩分之中,我取般若波羅蜜。為什麼呢?因為這般若波羅蜜中,生出諸佛舍利;因為這般若波羅蜜修薰的緣故,舍利才得到供養。世尊!若有善男子、善女人供養舍利,恭敬、尊重、讚歎,他的功德果報不可窮邊,領受人間、天上的福樂,也就是剎利大姓、婆羅門大姓、居士大家、四天王天處乃至他化自在天中領受福樂;也因為這福德的因緣,終當得以盡除眾苦。若領受這般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、講說、正憶念,這人便能具足禪波羅蜜乃至能具足檀波羅蜜,能具足四念處乃至能具足十八不共法;超過聲聞、辟支佛地,安住於菩薩位;安住菩薩位後,得菩薩神通,從這一佛國到那一佛國;這菩薩為了眾生的緣故而受身,隨眾生所應而成就眾生:或作轉輪聖王、或作剎利大姓、或作婆羅門大姓,來成就眾生。因為這個緣故,世尊!我不是因為輕慢、不恭敬才不取舍利,而是因為善男子、善女人供養般若波羅蜜就等於供養舍利的緣故。

『再者,世尊!若有人想要見十方無量阿僧祇(無數)諸世界中現在諸佛的法身、色身,這人就應當聽聞、受持般若波羅蜜,讀、誦、正憶念、為他人廣說。這樣的善男子、善女人就當見十方無量阿僧祇世界中諸佛的法身、色身。這善男子、善女人行般若波羅蜜,也應當以法相修念佛三昧。再者,善男子、善女人若想見現在諸佛,就應當領受這般若波羅蜜,乃至正憶念。』

以下是論釋。

論②:十二部經般若最勝;如意寶珠十九重配喻;般若為首明導

再者,關於『佛以三事示現,宣說十二部經』這一句。

有人問:一切說法的人當中,沒有能與佛相等的;佛所說的十二部經,無不完備,為什麼善男子只受持、讀誦般若,就與佛平等沒有差別?

回答:這裡是佛想要稱歎般若為大的緣故。在十二部經之中,般若最為殊勝。為什麼呢?因為宣說這般若波羅蜜,多能使人發菩薩心;宣說十二部經,卻雜然引發三乘之意。這裡並不是拿菩薩的功德去比佛那無量之身,而是就法身而說。菩薩只宣說般若,勸導大乘;佛雜然宣說,勸導三乘,所以說二者平等沒有差別。

再者,三事示現以及十二部經的根本,也就是所謂的「般若波羅蜜」。

供養十方如恒河沙數那麼多的諸佛,若又有人供養般若經卷,二者也平等沒有差別。

這裡佛說出般若之所以福德殊勝的緣由,也就是般若能破一切苦惱、衰病、怖畏等。就像負債的人依傍國王,王譬喻般若,負債的人譬喻舍利。舍利是先世業因緣所成的,在因緣中理應償還種種對報;但因為被般若波羅蜜薰習修成的緣故,宿命因緣的種種對報以及飢渴寒熱都近它不得,反而得到諸天世人所見的供養。就像負債的人依傍國王,反而被債主所敬。

先前說『沒有種種衰病以及怖畏』,是就內而言;如今說摩尼寶,人、非人都得不到方便,是就外而言。這人因為供養般若波羅蜜的緣故,無論今世、後世,若身有衰、心有病,全都能除;種種善願之事,都能隨意而得。

得了這般若波羅蜜的大寶,所以無種種怖畏、無所匱乏;譬如無價的寶珠,所願都能滿足。

有人問:摩尼寶珠,在頗梨(水晶)、金、銀、車𤦲、馬瑙、琉璃、珊瑚、琥珀、金剛等當中,是哪一種寶?

回答:有人說:這寶珠從龍王的腦中生出,人得了這珠,毒害不了它、火燒不了它,有這樣種種功德。

有人說:這是帝釋所執的金剛,與阿修羅戰鬥時,碎落在閻浮提。

有人說:是諸過去久遠佛的舍利,佛法既已滅盡,舍利就變成這珠,用來利益眾生。

有人說:因為眾生福德因緣的緣故,自然就有這珠。譬如因為罪的因緣,地獄中自然就有治罪的刑具。

這寶珠名叫「如意」,沒有固定的顏色,清澈輕妙,四天下的萬物,都在它上面照現。如意珠的義理,如先前所說。這寶常能出生一切寶物,衣服、飲食,隨意所欲,都能給與;也能除去種種衰惱病苦等。

這寶珠有兩種:有天上的如意寶,有人間的如意寶。諸天福德深厚的緣故,珠的功德具足;人福德淺薄的緣故,珠的功德不具足。

這珠所放的房舍、函篋之中,那地方也有威德。

所謂『般若波羅蜜也是這樣』。

如同如意寶珠能給在家人今世的富樂,隨他心意所欲;般若波羅蜜能給出家求道的人三乘解脫之樂,隨他心意所願。

如意寶珠放在哪裡,非人就得不到方便;般若波羅蜜也是這樣,行者的心若與它相應,惡邪的羅剎就不能進入他心中破壞道意、奪去慧命。再者,般若波羅蜜所在之處,魔、或魔民、地神、夜叉、諸惡鬼等都得不到方便。

如同寶珠能除四百零四種病,其根本是四種病:風、熱、冷、雜;般若波羅蜜也能除八萬四千種病,其根本是四種病:貪、瞋、癡、等分(三毒相等並起)。婬欲病分二萬一千,瞋恚病分二萬一千,愚癡病分二萬一千,等分病分二萬一千。以不淨觀除貪欲,以慈悲心除瞋恚,以觀因緣除愚癡,總合上面三種藥——或不淨、或慈悲、或觀因緣——來除等分病。

如同寶珠能除黑暗;般若也是這樣,能除三界的黑暗。

如同寶珠能除熱;般若也是這樣,能除婬欲、瞋恚之熱。

如同寶珠能除冷;般若也是這樣,能除無明、不信、不恭敬、懈怠等冷心。

日、月都是諸寶所成,日能發熱,月能發冷,雖然都利益眾生,但因為不能兼備(冷熱兩用),所以不名為如意。

寶珠所在之處,毒蛇等諸惡蟲所不能加害;般若也是這樣,貪欲等毒所不能為病。

若有人被毒蛇所螫,拿寶珠給他看,立時就痊癒;有人被貪欲等毒蛇所螫,得了般若波羅蜜,貪恚之毒立即除去,就像難陀、鴦群梨摩羅(央掘魔羅)等。

有人眼痛盲瞎,把寶珠給他看,立時痊癒;般若波羅蜜也是這樣,有人因無明、疑悔、顛倒邪見等破壞了慧眼,得了般若立時就明了。

如同人生癩瘡、癰腫,把寶珠給他看,立時痊癒;般若也是這樣,五逆、癩罪等,得了般若立時消滅。

如同用種種顏色裹著寶珠,放在水中就隨現一色;般若也是這樣,行者得了般若之力的緣故,心便柔軟,無所執著,隨順信手(信等五根中的信手)、五根等,也隨順四禪、四無量心、背捨、勝處以及一切入。再者,於須陀洹、斯陀含、阿那含、阿羅漢、辟支佛地,隨順遍學,無所違逆。第六種縹色,是虛空之色。行者得了般若,觀諸法空,心也隨順而不執著。像這樣種種,都是說:入於一切諸法,全都隨順無礙。

如同水混濁,雜色不淨,把珠放進去,就都清淨成一色;般若也是這樣,人有種種煩惱、邪見、戲論,擾亂其心而混濁,得了般若就清淨成一色。

如同如意珠有無量功德,般若的功德也是這樣。

如今就個別之相來說般若的功德:這如意珠,只能除惡鬼,不能壞魔天;般若卻能除這兩者。珠能治身病;般若能治身病、心病。珠能治人、神所治得的病;般若能治一切天、龍、鬼神所不能治的病。珠能治世世曾經治過的病;般若能治無始世界以來未曾治過的病。像這樣種種差別。

珠能照它所住之處的夜暗;般若能照一切與煩惱相應的無明黑暗,以及不共無明、一切法中不了達的癡暗黑暗。

珠只能破它所住之處的熱,不能破別處的熱;般若之力,乃至無量世界劫盡時的大火,一吹就能熄滅,何況是一處之熱!

珠只能除有形質的火、日之熱;般若能除三毒的心熱。

珠能除風雨、寒雪;般若能除十方無量世界眾生不信、不恭敬、懈怠之心等寒。

珠能卻退外來的毒螫,不能除四大這條毒蛇(喻身內四大之患);般若能畢竟除去這兩種毒。

珠不能治邪見之毒;般若卻能除。

珠能治肉眼;般若能治慧眼。

珠能治近見眼;般若能治遠見眼。

珠能治肉眼,但肉眼不會變作珠;般若能治慧眼,慧眼當下就成般若。

珠能治肉眼,後來病又復發;般若治慧眼,畢竟清淨。

珠能治癩瘡、惡腫;般若能治身癩、心癩。

有人問:四種病中,已統攝一切病,為什麼還要個別說「眼痛」、「癩病」等?

回答:眼是身中第一、所用最貴,所以個別說。諸病之中癩病最重,因為宿命罪的因緣而難治,所以再另外說。

珠能使水隨著所裹之色;般若能隨順心數(心所)善法。

珠不能轉人的心;般若能轉一切眾生心性之所樂、所欲。

珠能使它所放之處的濁水變清,卻不能使一切水變清;般若之力能使六覺(六種尋思)擾濁之心立時清淨;又能使諸龍王、鬼神王、人王等的貪恚濁心,得以清淨。

珠能使它所放之處的函篋、房舍有威德;般若之力能度十方無量世界阿僧祇眾生,使他們有威德。

珠的功德力入於函篋,函篋卻不能給人隨意的功德;舍利得了般若薰修的緣故,若有人供養,必還得般若而成佛。

這函篋,是凡夫之人所看重的;舍利,卻是凡夫、聖人都看重的。

函篋,是世間受樂之人所看重的;舍利,卻是出世間、以及世間受樂之人都看重的。

般若就是那如意寶珠,函篋就是舍利;舍利之中雖然沒有般若,卻因為被般若所薰的緣故而得供養。

再者,諸聖法之中,般若第一,無可譬喻;只因世間人看重這寶珠,所以拿珠來作譬喻。

人見了如意寶珠,所願都能滿足;若見了珠所住之處,也能得少分之願。行者也是這樣:得了這般若波羅蜜之義,當下就入佛道;若見了般若所住的舍利而供養的緣故,便得今世、後世無量福樂,久了必定得道。

這樣的總相、別相,應當了知。

有人問:般若若有這樣的功德,為什麼還說『舍利是五波羅蜜乃至一切種智所住之處,所以得供養』?

回答:先前已說:一切諸法,都以般若波羅蜜為首、為明導;譬如國王前來必有將領隨從,只要舉出他的主名,其餘的也就全都包舉在內了。

讚歎般若波羅蜜,這道理先前已經說過。

The Relics and the Scroll of Prajñā as Two Portions, and Śakra Takes Prajñā: The Relics Are Born from Prajñā

The Buddha told Śakra Devānām Indra (Śakra), saying: ‘Kauśika (another name for Śakra)! If the Buddha's relics filling Jambudvīpa (the great continent on which we live) were made one portion, and a scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra written out by someone were made another portion, which of these two portions would you take?’

Śakra Devānām Indra addressed the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! If the Buddha's relics filling Jambudvīpa were made one portion, and the scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra were made another portion, of these two portions I would rather take the scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra. Why? World-Honored One! It is not that I am without reverence for the Buddha's relics, nor that I am without esteem for them; it is only because the relics are born from prajñāpāramitā and are perfumed and cultivated by prajñāpāramitā that these relics receive offerings, reverence, esteem, and praise.’

At that time Śāriputra asked Śakra Devānām Indra: ‘Kauśika! This prajñāpāramitā cannot be taken; it is without form, without shape, without resistance (having no object standing over against it), and has only one mark, namely the signless. Why then would you take it? Why do I say this? Because this prajñāpāramitā does not appear for the sake of taking, does not appear for the sake of relinquishing, and does not appear for the sake of increase, decrease, gathering, dispersal, loss, gain, defilement, or purity. This prajñāpāramitā does not give the dharmas of the buddhas, nor does it abandon the dharmas of ordinary people; it does not give the dharmas of the pratyekabuddha, the dharmas of the arhat, or the dharmas of those in training, nor does it abandon the dharmas of ordinary people; it does not give the nature of the unconditioned, nor does it abandon the nature of the conditioned; it does not give inner emptiness and so on up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas, it does not give the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the omniscience of all kinds, nor does it abandon the dharmas of ordinary people.’

Śakra Devānām Indra answered Śāriputra: ‘Just so! Just so! Śāriputra! If someone knows that this prajñāpāramitā does not give the dharmas of the buddhas and does not abandon the dharmas of ordinary people, and so on up to: does not give the omniscience of all kinds and does not abandon the dharmas of ordinary people—such a bodhisattva-mahāsattva can practise prajñāpāramitā and can cultivate prajñāpāramitā. Why? Because prajñāpāramitā does not settle upon 「二法」 tr. "dual dharmas"; the mark of non-dual dharmas is prajñāpāramitā, and the mark of non-dual dharmas is dhyānapāramitā and so on up to dānapāramitā (the perfection of giving).’

At that time the Buddha praised Śakra Devānām Indra, saying: ‘Excellent! Excellent! Kauśika! It is just as you say: prajñāpāramitā does not settle upon dual dharmas, and therefore the mark of non-dual dharmas is prajñāpāramitā, and the mark of non-dual dharmas is dhyānapāramitā and so on up to dānapāramitā. Kauśika! If someone wishes to attain “two marks of the nature of dharmas”, this person wishes to attain two marks of prajñāpāramitā. Why? Kauśika! The nature of dharmas and prajñāpāramitā are without duality and without difference; and so on up to dānapāramitā, which is likewise. If someone wishes to attain “two marks of the limit of reality and of the nature of the inconceivable”, this person wishes to attain two marks of prajñāpāramitā. Why? Because prajñāpāramitā and the nature of the inconceivable are without duality and without difference.’

Śakra Devānām Indra addressed the Buddha: ‘World-Honored One! All the people of the world, together with the gods and the asuras, ought to worship and make offerings to prajñāpāramitā! Why? Because the bodhisattva-mahāsattvas train within prajñāpāramitā and only thereby attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi (unsurpassed, right, and complete awakening). World-Honored One! I often sit at ease in the Hall of Good Dharma; when I am not on my seat, the gods, for the sake of making offerings to me, pay homage to my seat, and only when they have finished circling it do they depart. The gods give rise to this thought: “Śakra Devānām Indra sits on this very seat and expounds the Dharma for the gods of the Heaven of the Thirty-three.” Just so, World-Honored One! Wherever this scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra is written out, received and upheld, read, recited, and expounded for others, to that place the gods, nāgas, yakṣas, gandharvas, asuras, garuḍas, kiṃnaras, and mahoragas of the worlds of the ten directions all come to worship prajñāpāramitā, and only when they have finished making offerings do they depart. Why? Because from within this prajñāpāramitā are born the buddhas and the requisites of peace and happiness of all beings, and the relics of the buddhas too are the cause and condition of the place where the omniscience of all kinds dwells. For this reason, World-Honored One, of these two portions I take prajñāpāramitā.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! If I receive and uphold, read, and recite prajñāpāramitā, and my mind enters deeply into the Dharma, at that time I do not see any mark to be feared. Why? World-Honored One! This prajñāpāramitā is without mark and without appearance, without words and without speech. World-Honored One! To be without mark and without appearance, without words and without speech—this is prajñāpāramitā, and so on up to: this is the omniscience of all kinds. World-Honored One! If prajñāpāramitā truly had marks and were not signless, then the buddhas ought not to have known 「一切法無相無貌、無言無說」 tr. "all dharmas are without mark and without appearance, without words and without speech" and so attained anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi, nor ought they to have proclaimed to their disciples 「諸法無相無貌、無言無說」 tr. "dharmas are without mark and without appearance, without words and without speech". World-Honored One! It is precisely because prajñāpāramitā is truly without mark and without appearance, without words and without speech, that the buddhas know that all dharmas are without mark and without appearance, without words and without speech, and attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi; and only thereby do they proclaim to their disciples that dharmas are likewise without mark and without appearance, without words and without speech. For this reason, World-Honored One, this prajñāpāramitā ought to receive the offerings, reverence, esteem, and praise of all the gods, humans, and asuras of the world, with flowers and incense, necklaces, and so on up to banners and canopies.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! If someone receives and upholds prajñāpāramitā, draws near to it, reads it, recites it, expounds it, rightly recollects it, and also writes it out and makes offerings to it with flowers and incense and so on up to banners and canopies, this person does not fall into the destinies of hell, animals, or hungry ghosts, and does not fall into the ground of the śrāvaka or the pratyekabuddha; and so on up to: he attains anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi and constantly sees the buddhas; going from one buddha-land to another buddha-land, he makes offerings to the buddhas, with reverence, esteem, and praise, with flowers and incense and so on up to banners and canopies.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! If the Buddha's relics filling the three-thousand great-thousand world were made one portion, and a written scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra were made another portion, of these two portions I would still take prajñāpāramitā. Why? World-Honored One! Because from within this prajñāpāramitā the relics of the buddhas are born; for this reason the relics receive offerings, reverence, esteem, and praise. These good men and good women, because they make offerings to and revere the relics, receive the blessings and happiness of the heavens and of the human world, and never fall into the three evil destinies; according to what they wish, they gradually enter nirvāṇa by the dharma of the three vehicles. Therefore, World-Honored One, if someone sees the present Buddha, or sees the scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra, the two are equal and without difference. Why? World-Honored One! Because this prajñāpāramitā and the Buddha are without duality and without difference.’

What follows is the treatise's explanation.

Treatise ①: The Relics Weighed against the Scroll, and Śakra as the Most Honoured among Householders; the Meaning of the Mark of Non-dual Dharmas

Someone asks: Above, offerings to prajñāpāramitā have already been weighed by means of raising stūpas of the seven jewels, and the meaning is already complete; why does the Buddha now again set the relics and the scroll against each other?

The answer: Earlier it was pointed out that the stūpa of the seven jewels is the dwelling place of the relics; now the relics alone are set against the scroll. Although the relics do not equal prajñā, they can fill Jambudvīpa; since prajñā is surpassing and wondrous, only the scroll is pointed to (the few surpassing the many).

Furthermore, those who have left the household mostly crave wisdom, because wisdom is the cause and condition of liberation; householders mostly crave merit, because merit is the cause and condition of happiness. Those who have left the household mostly crave the things known by mind-consciousness; householders mostly crave the things known by the five consciousnesses. Śakra Devānām Indra has already realised the greatest result of blessings and happiness, and among householders he is the most honoured and supreme; for this reason the Buddha asks Śakra Devānām Indra.

Śakra Devānām Indra says: ‘Of these two portions I take the scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra.’

Here Śakra himself states the reason: ‘World-Honored One! I do not dare to slight the relics or to be without reverence for them; I know that making offerings to relics the size of a mustard seed brings merit that is immeasurable and boundless, and so on up to: even the merit of attaining buddhahood is not exhausted—how much more relics filling Jambudvīpa! World-Honored One! The body the bodhisattva receives at birth has relics too, yet people do not esteem them; only when he becomes a Buddha are the relics, because they have been perfumed and cultivated by prajñā, revered, esteemed, and given offerings by people. Therefore of these two portions I take the surpassing portion.’

Someone asks: Śāriputra knew perfectly well that Śakra Devānām Indra spoke of 「取般若波羅蜜」 tr. "taking prajñāpāramitā" in terms of worldly truth (the principle commonly accepted in the world); why did he still raise a challenge?

The answer: Śakra Devānām Indra lives in the household, bound by the afflictions and covered by the five desires, and yet he is able to proclaim prajñāpāramitā—this is a rare thing! For this reason Śāriputra questioned him, wishing to make Śakra Devānām Indra go further and ask the Buddha about deeper meaning; therefore he raised the challenge.

Śakra Devānām Indra, following Śāriputra's intention, answers, saying: ‘Just so!’

Śakra Devānām Indra's intention is this: within all dharmas there are no two marks; he does not regard the relics as small, and does not regard prajñāpāramitā as great. Prajñāpāramitā has the mark of non-duality and non-discrimination; it is only in order to benefit bodhisattvas who have newly aroused the mind that he speaks thus in terms of worldly truth: ‘Prajñāpāramitā can make the minds of beings free of duality and free of discrimination; because of this benefit, I take prajñā.’

At this the Buddha praises Śakra Devānām Indra: ‘Excellent! Excellent!’ Because Śakra is able both to discriminate dharmas and to proclaim skilfully the mark of prajñā, which is precisely 「無二相」 tr. "the mark of non-duality", the Buddha therefore praises him.

Here the Buddha himself gives a simile: ‘If someone wishes to divide the nature of dharmas, the limit of reality, and so on into two portions, this person wishes to divide prajñāpāramitā into two portions.’

Śakra had himself proclaimed prajñā, and further heard the Buddha make it clear again; his mind was pure, and with deep faith and joy he said: all the world ought to worship prajñā.

Here Śakra himself states the reason: ‘All bodhisattvas train in this prajñā and only thereby attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi.’

Again, here he takes his own person as a simile: his own person is a simile for the Buddha, and the scroll of the prajñā sūtra is a simile for the seat.

There are also those who say: his own person is a simile for prajñā, and the seat is a simile for the relics.

‘Therefore of these two portions I take prajñā.’

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! If I receive and uphold prajñā, read and recite it, at that time I do not see even a mark to be feared—how much more a fear that is real! Why? Because all dharmas are signless, without words and without speech. Prajñāpāramitā can make a person attain this signless dharma, and therefore there is nothing to be feared.’

The person who receives, upholds, and makes offerings to prajñā does not fall into the three evil destinies or into the paths of the two vehicles; life after life he is not parted from the buddhas, and he constantly makes offerings to the buddhas of the ten directions. Therefore prajñāpāramitā is what all the world ought to make offerings to.

Furthermore, the Buddha first made a beginning, taking the relics filling Jambudvīpa as the example. Śakra, having understood which of these two things surpasses the other, for the sake of all beings widens the scope to the three-thousand great-thousand world; here Śakra himself states the reason: ‘To see prajñāpāramitā is no different from seeing the Buddha.’

Sūtra ②: The Three Kinds of Manifestation and the Twelve Divisions of the Scriptures Are All Born from Prajñā; the Simile of the Debtor Who Relies on the King; the Simile of the Maṇi Jewel

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! Just as the Buddha, by the three kinds of manifestation (the three kinds of guidance: supernormal power, reading minds, and instruction), proclaims the twelve divisions of the scriptures—sūtra, geya, and so on up to upadeśa—so too there are good men and good women who receive and uphold, recite, and expound this prajñāpāramitā; the two are equal and without difference. Why? World-Honored One! Because from within this prajñāpāramitā are born the three kinds of manifestation and the twelve divisions of the scriptures: sūtra and so on up to upadeśa.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! The buddhas of the ten directions, by the three kinds of manifestation, proclaim the twelve divisions of the scriptures: sūtra and so on up to upadeśa; so too there are those who receive prajñāpāramitā and proclaim it for others; the two are equal and without difference. Why? Because from within prajñāpāramitā the buddhas are born, and the twelve divisions of the scriptures too are born: sūtra and so on up to upadeśa.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! If someone makes offerings to the buddhas in worlds of the ten directions as many as the sands of the Ganges, with reverence, esteem, and praise, with flowers and incense and so on up to banners and canopies; and again someone writes out the scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra, with reverence, esteem, and praise, with flowers and incense and so on up to banners and canopies, the blessings of these two are exactly equal. Why? Because the buddhas of the ten directions are all born from prajñāpāramitā.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! Good men and good women who hear this prajñāpāramitā, receive and uphold it, read it, recite it, rightly recollect it, and also proclaim it for others—these people do not fall into the destiny of hell, of animals, or of hungry ghosts, nor do they fall into the ground of the śrāvaka or the pratyekabuddha. Why? It should be known that it is because these good men and good women are abiding rightly in the ground of avaivartika (non-retrogressing). This prajñāpāramitā keeps far away from all suffering and vexation, decline and sickness.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! If good men and good women write out this scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra, receive and uphold it, draw near to it, make offerings to it, revere it, esteem it, and praise it, these people then keep far away from all fear. World-Honored One! It is like a debtor who draws near to the king, supplying him and attending him at his left and right: the creditors, on the contrary, make still more offerings to this person and revere him, and this person no longer fears. Why? World-Honored One! Because this person relies on and is close to the king, and depends on the king's having power. Just so, World-Honored One! The relics of the buddhas receive offerings and reverence only because they have been perfumed and cultivated by prajñāpāramitā. World-Honored One! It should be known that prajñāpāramitā is like the king, and the relics are like the debtor; as the debtor, relying on the king, receives offerings, so the relics too, relying on prajñāpāramitā, are cultivated and perfumed and only thereby receive offerings. World-Honored One! It should be known that the omniscience of all kinds of the buddhas too is accomplished only through being cultivated and perfumed by prajñāpāramitā. For this reason, World-Honored One, of these two portions I take prajñāpāramitā. Why? World-Honored One! Because from within prajñāpāramitā are born the relics of the buddhas and the thirty-two marks; from within prajñāpāramitā are also born the Buddha's ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, the eighteen unshared dharmas, and great loving-kindness and great compassion. World-Honored One! From within prajñāpāramitā are born the five perfections, and it makes them receive the name 「波羅蜜」 tr. "pāramitā"; from within prajñāpāramitā is born the omniscience of all kinds of the buddhas.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! Wherever within the three-thousand great-thousand world someone receives and upholds, makes offerings to, reveres, esteems, and praises prajñāpāramitā, in that place neither humans nor non-humans can find an opening against him (there is no gap for them to exploit), and this person then gradually enters nirvāṇa. World-Honored One! Prajñāpāramitā has such great benefit that it can do the work of a Buddha within the three-thousand great-thousand world! World-Honored One! Wherever prajñāpāramitā is, it is the same as the Buddha being there. World-Honored One! It is like the priceless maṇi jewel: in the place where it dwells, non-humans cannot find an opening. If a man or a woman has a fever and this jewel is placed on the body, the fever is healed at once; if there is wind sickness, if there is cold sickness, if there is sickness of mixed heat, wind, and cold, and the jewel is placed on the body, all are healed. If it is dark, this jewel can make it bright. When it is hot it can make it cool, and when it is cold it can make it warm; in the place where the jewel dwells, that place is neither cold nor hot, and the seasons are harmonious and fitting. In that place, too, there are none of the various other poisons and stings; if a man or a woman is bitten by a poisonous snake and the jewel is shown to him, the poison is removed at once.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! If a man or a woman has pain in the eyes, a film grown over the eyes, or blindness, and the jewel is shown to him, he is healed at once. If there are leprous sores or malignant swellings, and the jewel is placed on his body, the sickness is healed at once.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! When this maṇi jewel is placed in water, the water accordingly shows one colour: if it is wrapped in something blue and placed in the water, the water becomes blue; if it is wrapped in something yellow, red, white, crimson, or pale blue (a light bluish colour) and placed in the water, the water accordingly shows yellow, red, white, crimson, or pale blue. Thus, wrapped in things of various colours and put into the water, the water accordingly shows the various colours. World-Honored One! If the water is turbid and the jewel is put into it, the water at once becomes clear—such are the merits of this jewel!’

At that time Ānanda asked Śakra Devānām Indra: ‘Kauśika! Is this maṇi jewel a jewel of the heavens? Or a jewel of Jambudvīpa?’

Śakra Devānām Indra answered Ānanda: ‘It is a jewel of the heavens. The people of Jambudvīpa also have this kind of jewel, but its marks of merit are few and not complete; the jewel of the heavens is pure, light, and subtle, and cannot be compared by any simile.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! If this maṇi jewel is placed in a casket (a small box), then after the jewel is taken out, because its merit has perfumed the casket, people all love and revere that casket. Just so, World-Honored One! Wherever a written scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra dwells, that place is without the troubles of many vexations, just as the place where the maṇi jewel is placed is without many calamities. World-Honored One! After the Buddha's parinirvāṇa (nirvāṇa), that the relics receive offerings is entirely the power of prajñāpāramitā; dhyānapāramitā and so on up to dānapāramitā, inner emptiness and so on up to the emptiness of non-existent and existent dharmas, the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, omniscience, the mark of dharmas, the abiding of dharmas, the position of dharmas, the nature of dharmas, the limit of reality, the nature of the inconceivable, and the omniscience of all kinds—all these are the power of these merits. Good men and good women give rise to this thought: “These relics of the Buddha are the dwelling place of the merits of the buddhas: omniscience, the omniscience of all kinds, great loving-kindness and great compassion, the cutting off of all fetters together with their residual habits, the practice of constant equanimity, the dharma of never erring, and the like.” For this reason the relics receive offerings. World-Honored One! The relics are the dwelling place of the pāramitā of the jewels of all merits, the dwelling place of the pāramitā that is neither stained nor pure; they are the dwelling place of the pāramitā that neither arises nor ceases, the pāramitā that neither enters nor exits, the pāramitā that neither increases nor diminishes, and the pāramitā that neither comes nor goes nor abides; these relics of the Buddha are the dwelling place of the pāramitā of the marks of all dharmas; it is because they have been perfumed and cultivated by this pāramitā of the marks of all dharmas that the relics receive offerings.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! Set aside the relics filling the three-thousand great-thousand world. If the relics filling worlds as many as the sands of the Ganges were made one portion, and a scroll of the prajñāpāramitā sūtra written out by someone were made another portion, of these two portions I take prajñāpāramitā. Why? Because from within this prajñāpāramitā the relics of the buddhas are born; because of being cultivated and perfumed by this prajñāpāramitā, the relics receive offerings. World-Honored One! If good men and good women make offerings to the relics, with reverence, esteem, and praise, the result of their merit cannot be exhausted to its limit; they receive the blessings and happiness of the human world and of the heavens, that is, they receive blessings and happiness among the great kṣatriya clans, the great brahmin clans, and the great householder families, and in the heaven of the Four Heavenly Kings and so on up to the gods Sovereign over Others' Transformations; and through the causes and conditions of this merit they will in the end be able to put an end to all suffering. If one receives this prajñāpāramitā, reads it, recites it, expounds it, and rightly recollects it, this person can then fulfil dhyānapāramitā and so on up to fulfilling dānapāramitā, can fulfil the four foundations of mindfulness and so on up to fulfilling the eighteen unshared dharmas; he passes beyond the grounds of the śrāvaka and the pratyekabuddha and abides in the bodhisattva position; having abided in the bodhisattva position, he attains the bodhisattva's supernormal powers and goes from one buddha-land to another buddha-land; this bodhisattva, for the sake of beings, takes on a body, and according to what beings require he brings beings to accomplishment: now as a wheel-turning sage king, now in a great kṣatriya clan, now in a great brahmin clan, he brings beings to accomplishment. For this reason, World-Honored One, it is not out of slighting or irreverence that I do not take the relics; it is because good men and good women who make offerings to prajñāpāramitā are thereby making offerings to the relics.

‘Furthermore, World-Honored One! If someone wishes to see the Dharma body and the form body of the buddhas now present in the immeasurable asaṃkhyeya (countless) worlds of the ten directions, this person ought to hear and receive and uphold prajñāpāramitā, read it, recite it, rightly recollect it, and expound it widely for others. Such good men and good women will see the Dharma body and the form body of the buddhas in the immeasurable asaṃkhyeya worlds of the ten directions. These good men and good women who practise prajñāpāramitā ought also to cultivate the samādhi of recollecting the Buddha by way of the mark of dharmas. Furthermore, if good men and good women wish to see the buddhas now present, they ought to receive this prajñāpāramitā, and so on up to: rightly recollect it.’

What follows is the treatise's explanation.

Treatise ②: Among the Twelve Divisions of the Scriptures Prajñā Is Most Surpassing; the Nineteenfold Matching of the Simile of the Wish-fulfilling Jewel; Prajñā as the Head and the Bright Guide

Furthermore, concerning the phrase ‘the Buddha, by the three kinds of manifestation, proclaims the twelve divisions of the scriptures’.

Someone asks: Among all who expound the Dharma, there is none who can equal the Buddha; the twelve divisions of the scriptures spoken by the Buddha lack nothing; why is it that a good man who merely receives and upholds, reads, and recites prajñā is equal to the Buddha and without difference?

The answer: Here it is because the Buddha wishes to praise prajñā as great. Among the twelve divisions of the scriptures, prajñā is the most surpassing. Why? Because proclaiming this prajñāpāramitā mostly makes people arouse the bodhisattva mind, whereas proclaiming the twelve divisions of the scriptures arouses the intentions of the three vehicles all mixed together. Here it is not the bodhisattva's merit being compared with the Buddha's immeasurable body; it is spoken with regard to the Dharma body. The bodhisattva proclaims only prajñā and exhorts to the Great Vehicle; the Buddha proclaims in a mixed way and exhorts to the three vehicles; therefore it is said that the two are equal and without difference.

Furthermore, the root of the three kinds of manifestation and of the twelve divisions of the scriptures is precisely what is called 「般若波羅蜜」 tr. "prajñāpāramitā".

Making offerings to buddhas as many as the sands of the Ganges in the ten directions, and again someone making offerings to the scroll of the prajñā sūtra—the two are also equal and without difference.

Here the Buddha states the reason why the merit of prajñā is surpassing, namely that prajñā can break all suffering and vexation, decline and sickness, fear, and the like. It is like a debtor who relies on the king: the king is a simile for prajñā, and the debtor is a simile for the relics. The relics are formed by the causes and conditions of karma in former lives, and within those causes and conditions they ought to repay all kinds of requital; but because they have been perfumed and cultivated by prajñāpāramitā, the various requitals of the causes and conditions of past lives, as well as hunger and thirst, cold and heat, cannot come near them, and on the contrary they receive the offerings seen by the gods and the people of the world. It is like a debtor who relies on the king and is on the contrary revered by his creditors.

What was said earlier, ‘there are none of the various declines and sicknesses, nor fear’, is said with regard to the inner; what is now said of the maṇi jewel, that neither humans nor non-humans can find an opening, is said with regard to the outer. Because this person makes offerings to prajñāpāramitā, whether in this life or in later lives, if the body has decline or the mind has sickness, all can be removed; all kinds of matters of wholesome wishes can be obtained as one wishes.

Having obtained this great jewel of prajñāpāramitā, one is therefore without the various fears and without any lack; it is like the priceless jewel, by which every wish can be fulfilled.

Someone asks: The maṇi jewel—among sphaṭika (crystal), gold, silver, giant clam shell, agate, beryl, coral, amber, vajra, and the like, which kind of jewel is it?

The answer: Someone says: this jewel comes forth from the brain of a nāga king; when a person obtains this jewel, poison cannot harm it and fire cannot burn it; it has such various merits.

Someone says: this is the vajra held by Śakra, which, when he fought with the asuras, broke and fell into Jambudvīpa.

Someone says: these are the relics of the buddhas of the distant past; when the Buddha-Dharma had already perished, the relics turned into this jewel, to benefit beings.

Someone says: because of the causes and conditions of beings' merit, this jewel exists spontaneously. It is like how, because of the causes and conditions of sin, the instruments for punishing sin exist spontaneously in the hells.

This jewel is named 「如意」 tr. "as one wishes"; it has no fixed colour, is clear, light, and subtle, and the myriad things of the four continents are all reflected upon it. The meaning of the wish-fulfilling jewel is as was said before. This jewel can constantly produce all precious things; clothing and food, whatever one wishes, it can give; it can also remove the various declines, vexations, sicknesses, sufferings, and the like.

This jewel is of two kinds: there is the wish-fulfilling jewel of the heavens, and there is the wish-fulfilling jewel of the human world. Because the merit of the gods is deep and thick, the merits of their jewel are complete; because the merit of humans is shallow and thin, the merits of their jewel are not complete.

In the rooms and caskets where this jewel is placed, that place too has majestic virtue.

As is said: ‘Prajñāpāramitā too is like this.’

Just as the wish-fulfilling jewel can give householders wealth and happiness in this life, according to whatever their minds wish, so prajñāpāramitā can give those who have left the household to seek the path the happiness of liberation of the three vehicles, according to whatever their minds aspire to.

Wherever the wish-fulfilling jewel is placed, non-humans cannot find an opening; prajñāpāramitā is also like this: if the practitioner's mind is in accord with it, evil and wrong rākṣasas cannot enter his mind to destroy his intent for the path and rob him of his wisdom-life. Furthermore, wherever prajñāpāramitā is, Māra, or Māra's people, earth spirits, yakṣas, the evil ghosts, and the like all cannot find an opening.

Just as the jewel can remove the four hundred and four sicknesses, whose root is four sicknesses—wind, heat, cold, and the mixed—so prajñāpāramitā can also remove the eighty-four thousand sicknesses, whose root is four sicknesses: greed, hatred, delusion, and their equal mixture (the three poisons arising together in equal measure). The sickness of lust divides into twenty-one thousand, the sickness of anger and hatred divides into twenty-one thousand, the sickness of delusion divides into twenty-one thousand, and the sickness of the equal mixture divides into twenty-one thousand. By the contemplation of impurity one removes greed and desire; by the mind of kindness and compassion one removes anger and hatred; by the contemplation of causes and conditions one removes delusion; and by combining the three medicines above—whether impurity, or kindness and compassion, or the contemplation of causes and conditions—one removes the sickness of the equal mixture.

Just as the jewel can remove darkness, prajñā too is like this: it can remove the darkness of the three realms.

Just as the jewel can remove heat, prajñā too is like this: it can remove the heat of lust and of anger and hatred.

Just as the jewel can remove cold, prajñā too is like this: it can remove the cold minds of ignorance, lack of faith, lack of reverence, laziness, and the like.

The sun and the moon are both made of jewels; the sun can give forth heat and the moon can give forth cold, and although both benefit beings, because they cannot combine both (the use of cold and the use of heat), they are not called ‘as one wishes’.

Wherever the jewel is, poisonous snakes and all the evil vermin cannot harm; prajñā too is like this: the poisons of greed and desire and the like cannot make one sick.

If someone is bitten by a poisonous snake and the jewel is shown to him, he is healed at once; if someone is bitten by the poisonous snakes of greed and desire and the like and obtains prajñāpāramitā, the poison of greed and hatred is removed at once, as with Nanda, Aṅgulimāla (the same name in another transliteration), and others.

If someone has pain in the eyes or is blind and the jewel is shown to him, he is healed at once; prajñāpāramitā too is like this: if someone's wisdom-eye has been destroyed by ignorance, doubt and regret, inverted wrong views, and the like, on obtaining prajñā it at once becomes clear.

Just as when a person has leprous sores or ulcerous swellings and the jewel is shown to him he is healed at once, prajñā too is like this: the five heinous sins, the leprosy of sin, and the like are extinguished at once on obtaining prajñā.

Just as, when the jewel is wrapped in various colours and placed in water, the water accordingly shows one colour, prajñā too is like this: because the practitioner has obtained the power of prajñā, his mind becomes soft and pliant and clings to nothing; he goes along with the hand of faith (the hand of faith among the five faculties beginning with faith), the five faculties, and so on, and also goes along with the four dhyānas, the four immeasurable minds, the liberations, the spheres of mastery, and the all-encompassing spheres. Furthermore, in the grounds of the srota-āpanna, the sakṛdāgāmin, the anāgāmin, the arhat, and the pratyekabuddha, he goes along with them and trains in them all, without any opposition. The sixth, the pale-blue colour, is the colour of space. The practitioner, having obtained prajñā, contemplates dharmas as empty, and his mind too goes along with this and does not cling. All such things as these say: entering into all dharmas, one goes along with them all without obstruction.

Just as when water is turbid, mixed in colour and impure, and the jewel is put into it, it all becomes pure and of one colour, prajñā too is like this: when a person has various afflictions, wrong views, and idle discourse that disturb his mind and make it turbid, on obtaining prajñā it becomes pure and of one colour.

Just as the wish-fulfilling jewel has immeasurable merits, the merits of prajñā too are like this.

Now, in terms of their particular marks, the merits of prajñā are spoken of: this wish-fulfilling jewel can only remove evil ghosts, and cannot destroy the Māra-gods; prajñā can remove both of these. The jewel can cure sicknesses of the body; prajñā can cure sicknesses of the body and sicknesses of the mind. The jewel can cure sicknesses that humans and spirits are able to cure; prajñā can cure sicknesses that no gods, nāgas, ghosts, or spirits are able to cure. The jewel can cure sicknesses that have been cured before in life after life; prajñā can cure sicknesses that have never been cured since the beginningless world. There are such various differences as these.

The jewel can illuminate the darkness of night in the place where it dwells; prajñā can illuminate the black darkness of ignorance associated with all the afflictions, as well as the black darkness of delusion, the unshared ignorance that does not penetrate all dharmas.

The jewel can only break the heat in the place where it dwells, and cannot break heat elsewhere; the power of prajñā can, with a single breath, extinguish even the great fire at the end of the kalpa in immeasurable worlds—how much more the heat of a single place!

The jewel can only remove the heat of fire and sun that have physical substance; prajñā can remove the heat of mind of the three poisons.

The jewel can remove wind and rain, cold and snow; prajñā can remove the cold of the minds of lack of faith, lack of reverence, laziness, and the like, of beings in the immeasurable worlds of the ten directions.

The jewel can drive off poisons and stings coming from outside, but cannot remove the poisonous snake of the four great elements (a simile for the afflictions of the four great elements within the body); prajñā can ultimately remove both of these poisons.

The jewel cannot cure the poison of wrong views; prajñā can remove it.

The jewel can cure the fleshly eye; prajñā can cure the wisdom-eye.

The jewel can cure the eye that sees what is near; prajñā can cure the eye that sees what is far.

The jewel can cure the fleshly eye, but the fleshly eye does not turn into the jewel; prajñā can cure the wisdom-eye, and the wisdom-eye at once becomes prajñā.

The jewel can cure the fleshly eye, and later the sickness returns; prajñā cures the wisdom-eye, and it is ultimately pure.

The jewel can cure leprous sores and malignant swellings; prajñā can cure the leprosy of the body and the leprosy of the mind.

Someone asks: Among the four kinds of sickness, all sicknesses are already included; why further speak separately of 「眼痛」 tr. "pain in the eyes", 「癩病」 tr. "leprosy", and so on?

The answer: The eye is foremost in the body and the most precious in use, so it is spoken of separately. Among all sicknesses leprosy is the heaviest; because of the causes and conditions of sin in past lives it is hard to cure, so it is spoken of again separately.

The jewel can make water follow the colour in which it is wrapped; prajñā can go along with wholesome mental-factor dharmas (the mental concomitants).

The jewel cannot turn people's minds; prajñā can turn what the mind-nature of all beings delights in and desires.

The jewel can make the turbid water in the place where it is placed become clear, but not all water; the power of prajñā can make the mind disturbed and made turbid by the six thoughts (six kinds of discursive thinking) pure at once; and it can further make pure the turbid minds of greed and hatred of the nāga kings, the kings of ghosts and spirits, the kings of humans, and the like.

The jewel can give majestic virtue to the caskets and rooms where it is placed; the power of prajñā can deliver asaṃkhyeya beings in the immeasurable worlds of the ten directions and give them majestic virtue.

The power of the jewel's merit enters the casket, but the casket cannot give people merit according to their wishes; because the relics have obtained the perfuming and cultivation of prajñā, if someone makes offerings to them, he will surely in turn obtain prajñā and become a Buddha.

This casket is esteemed by ordinary people; the relics are esteemed by ordinary people and noble ones alike.

The casket is esteemed by worldly people who enjoy pleasure; the relics are esteemed both by those who transcend the world and by worldly people who enjoy pleasure.

Prajñā is that wish-fulfilling jewel, and the casket is the relics; although there is no prajñā within the relics, because they have been perfumed by prajñā they receive offerings.

Furthermore, among all the noble dharmas, prajñā is foremost and beyond any simile; it is only because the people of the world esteem this jewel that the jewel is taken as a simile.

When a person sees the wish-fulfilling jewel, every wish can be fulfilled; if he sees the place where the jewel dwells, he can also obtain a small share of his wishes. The practitioner too is like this: having obtained the meaning of this prajñāpāramitā, he at once enters the Buddha path; if he sees the relics where prajñā dwells and makes offerings to them, he then obtains immeasurable blessings and happiness in this life and in later lives, and in time will surely attain the path.

Such general marks and particular marks as these should be understood.

Someone asks: If prajñā has such merits, why is it further said, ‘the relics are the dwelling place of the five perfections and so on up to the omniscience of all kinds, and therefore receive offerings’?

The answer: It has already been said earlier: of all dharmas, prajñāpāramitā is the head and acts as the bright guide; it is like a king who comes, always with a retinue following him: one needs only to name the lord, and all the rest are already included.

The principle of praising prajñāpāramitā has already been spoken of earlier.

義疏Exposition

校量舍利品之上:舍利從般若中生,二分取般若;如意寶珠喻般若功德

在問什麼

這一單元的題面是一場『二分抉擇』:佛把充滿閻浮提的佛舍利放一邊、把書寫的般若經卷放一邊,問帝釋取哪一邊。帝釋不取舍利而取般若。乍看像是輕慢舍利,其實正相反——帝釋立刻申明『我於佛舍利非不恭敬、非不尊重』,他取般若的理由只有一句:舍利之所以尊貴,是因為「從般若波羅蜜中生、般若波羅蜜薰修故」。所以真正的問題不是『舍利與般若孰貴』,而是『舍利的貴,其源頭在哪裡』。這一問一舉把供養的對象從果溯到因、從所生溯到能生。

這一問也回應了本品品名的兩面——「校量舍利」四字,一面是「校量」(權衡供養功德之遞階),一面是「舍利」(所校之物)。全單元的用力處,正是要在校量之中辨明:功德之多寡,不取決於所供物之大小、數量,而取決於所供之本是否為般若。故雖以『滿閻浮提舍利』對『一卷經卷』,量懸殊而般若反勝——這是本品「校量」二字的骨眼。

單元裡有兩處逆折把題眼逼得更緊。其一,舍利弗橫插一難:般若『無色、無形、無對,一相所謂無相』,既是無相不可取,帝釋憑什麼「取」?這一難把「取般若」逼向「不二法相」——帝釋答般若「不行二法」,取而無取相,才叫真取。其二,論主自設數問:既已用七寶塔校量過,何必再以舍利對校?既說般若無相,云何供養與佛等?既說般若功德如此之大,何以又說「舍利是五波羅蜜乃至一切種智所住處故得供養」?這三問把『能生(般若)』與『所生(舍利、經卷、諸佛功德)』之間的關係一層層剝開。全單元的骨幹,就是用一顆「如意寶珠」的譬喻,把般若如何為一切功德之所從出、又如何遠勝於它所出生的舍利,逐一配說清楚。

逐段解明

先看經①的抉擇與帝釋的理由。佛以『滿閻浮提舍利』對『書般若經卷』令帝釋取捨,帝釋取般若,並自陳因緣:舍利是「從般若波羅蜜中生、般若波羅蜜薰修故」才得供養。這一句是全品的根:舍利可貴,貴在其為般若所生所薰之果;取果不如取因,取所生不如取能生,故不取舍利而取般若,正是取其本源。到三千大千世界之量,帝釋仍取般若,理由更進一步——「是般若波羅蜜中生諸佛舍利」,乃至『若見現在佛、若見般若波羅蜜經卷,等無異』,因為「般若波羅蜜與佛無二無別故」。由『舍利從般若生』到『般若與佛無二』,能生之義一路推到極致:般若不僅生舍利,且與佛體無別,故見經卷即如見佛。這裡先立起本品的總命題:般若是舍利與佛的能生之本,供養舍利的功德實從般若而來。

舍利弗的質難與帝釋的回答,是經①的第一個關口。舍利弗說般若『無色、無形、無對,一相所謂無相』,且般若「不為取故出,不為捨故出,不為增減、聚散、損益、垢淨故出」,不與諸佛法、不捨凡人法,乃至不與一切種智、不捨凡人法——既是這樣一個離一切取捨增減之法,云何「欲取」?此難極利:般若既是絕待無相,一起「取」念便落能取所取之二,豈非自違其無相之性?帝釋順勢答出全品最要緊的一句義理:「般若波羅蜜不行二法故,不二法相是般若波羅蜜,不二法相是禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜。」他所謂「取」,不是取一個對象,而是行於不二;正因不落取捨二邊,才是真能行、真能修般若——不二法相不僅是般若之相,也是禪定乃至布施諸度之相,六度但一不二之慧貫之。佛隨即印可,並把不二推廣到法性、實際、不可思議性:凡欲得「法性二相」者即欲得『般若二相』,而「法性、般若波羅蜜,無二無別」;欲得「實際、不可思議性二相」者亦然。這就把『無相不可取』與「取般若」兩句表面相違的話,收在「不二」上會通了:無相不是空無可取,是取而不立取相;取般若不是別有所得,是契入法性之不二。

接著帝釋廣陳般若功德,一連數喻。善法堂坐喻是說:帝釋不在座時,諸天子猶為其座作禮,正如般若經卷所住之處,十方天龍八部皆來禮拜供養——因為「是般若波羅蜜中生諸佛及一切眾生樂具」。這一喻要緊的不是天神來拜,而是「所住處」即成聖所:座之受敬不在座本身,在座上曾說法之人;經卷之受敬不在紙墨,在其所詮之般若。無相無畏之義是說:受持般若、心深入法,「不見怖畏相」,因般若「無相無貌、無言無說」;更翻進一層——正因般若實是無相無說,諸佛才能「知一切諸法無相無貌、無言無說」而成正覺、而為弟子說法。這一句把「無相」從消極的「不可取」翻成積極的『成佛之所以然』:不是般若因無相而不足取,恰是諸佛因證此無相而成佛、而說法。再說受持般若之益:親近讀誦書寫正憶念供養者,不墮地獄畜生餓鬼、不墮聲聞辟支佛地,乃至得無上菩提、常見諸佛,從一佛界至一佛界供養諸佛——福之極致,全繫於一卷無相之經。

論①先解『以少勝多』之問:七寶塔本是舍利住處,如今單提舍利對校經卷,是「舍利雖不及般若,而滿閻浮提;般若妙故,但明經卷」——以充滿閻浮提之舍利尚不敵一卷般若,正見般若之妙。又解佛何以問帝釋:出家人多貪智慧(解脫因)、在家人多貪福德(樂因),出家人多貪意識所知物、在家人多貪五識所知物,帝釋「已證福樂果報最大,於在家人中最為尊勝」,故佛特問之,令這位福德之尊自陳取捨,其言更有分量。帝釋自陳因緣亦有分寸:他「不敢輕慢、不恭敬舍利」,明知供養芥子許舍利功德已無量無邊,然「菩薩受身便有舍利,人所不貴;得成佛時,舍利以般若熏修故,人所恭敬」——同是舍利,成佛前後之貴賤所別者,正在有無般若之薰,故取那能薰之勝者。論主又替舍利弗的「難」定性:帝釋身在家、為煩惱五欲所覆而能說般若,是「希有」事,舍利弗質問乃是「欲令釋提桓因更問佛深義」,並非真疑。帝釋順答「如是」,其意在『一切法中無二相,不以舍利為小、不以般若為大』;他就世諦而說般若「能令眾生心無二無分別」,是「為利益新發意菩薩」——可見帝釋一路是就世諦方便而說,其骨子仍是不二。至於「己身為喻」,論主並存兩說:一說自身喻佛、經卷喻坐處,一說自身喻般若、坐處喻舍利——前者為論主自釋,後者出「有人言」,論主並錄不判。論主末又點出佛「開其初,以舍利滿閻浮提」,帝釋既悟勝負,遂為一切眾生廣至三千大千世界,其自說因緣即「見般若波羅蜜,與見佛無異」——由閻浮提一量推至大千一量,取般若之志始終不移。

經②承前把功德鋪得更廣,並引入負債依王與摩尼寶兩大喻。三事示現、十二部經皆從般若中生;不僅本土如此,十方諸佛住三事示現、說十二部經亦「般若波羅蜜中生諸佛,亦生十二部經」,故受持般若、為他人說者與佛「等無異」。供養十方恒沙諸佛與書般若經卷,「其福正等」,因「十方諸佛皆從般若波羅蜜中生」——這是全品反覆致意的一義:功德之量取決於所依之本,本既相同,其福便等。又說聞般若受持正憶念者,「正住阿鞞跋致地中」,遠離一切苦惱衰病——受持之益不止免墮惡道,更正入不退轉位。負債依王喻最見『能生』之義:舍利如負債之人,般若如王,「負債人依王故得供養,舍利亦依般若波羅蜜修薰故得供養」;諸佛一切種智亦從般若修薰而成就。故般若中「生諸佛舍利、三十二相」,生「十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、大慈大悲」,生五波羅蜜之得名、生諸佛一切種智——這一長串功德的清單不是鋪張,而是把『般若為能生』一路數到佛地諸德,令人見般若所出之廣。摩尼寶喻則正式登場:寶所住處非人不得便,能除熱冷風雜諸病、除毒蛇螫、明闇處、令濁水隨色而清——阿難於此一問(本品阿難唯一出場),帝釋答此為天上寶,閻浮提亦有而「功德相少不具足」,正襯天上之寶清淨輕妙不可為比,喻般若功德之非世法可擬。帝釋更申舍利得供養「皆般若波羅蜜力」,並列舉舍利乃是「諸功德寶波羅蜜住處」「不垢不淨波羅蜜住處」以至「諸法相波羅蜜住處」,因被諸法相波羅蜜薰修,故得供養;乃至受持般若者能具足六度、四念處乃至十八不共法,過二乘地、住菩薩位、得菩薩神通,為眾生受身而成就眾生。末更說欲見十方諸佛法身色身者,當受持般若、以法相修念佛三昧——把供養之校量,收歸於「見佛」這一究竟利益上。

論②是本單元義理最密之處,環繞「如意寶珠」把般若功德逐一配說。先解『云何但受持般若即與佛等』:佛欲稱歎般若為大,「於十二部經中,般若為最勝」,因說般若多發菩薩心、說十二部經雜發三乘意,此就法身而說,故等無異。次解摩尼寶珠出處,論主並列四說(龍王腦中出/帝釋金剛碎落/過去佛舍利所變/眾生福德自然有),此亦古德異說,誌錄不判。論主又先總攝一句:般若之所以福德勝,在於「能破一切苦惱、衰病、怖畏」,且分內外二門——「無諸衰病及怖畏」以明內,『摩尼寶人非人不得其便』以明外,內外交顯,見般若護念之周。

接著是全品最綿密的『珠—般若』對配,可看作一張以珠襯般若、又處處見珠所不及的對照表。病之對配:珠除四百四病、根本四病(風熱冷雜),般若除八萬四千病、根本四病(貪瞋癡等分),並詳出對治之藥——以不淨觀除貪欲、以慈悲心除瞋恚、以觀因緣除愚癡,總合三藥以治等分病,此是把八萬四千煩惱收歸三毒、三毒收歸三觀的實修綱要。除闇除熱除冷之對配:珠除黑闇,般若除三界黑闇;珠除熱,般若除婬欲瞋恚之熱;珠除冷,般若除無明不信懈怠之冷心——外物之寒熱易除,心性之寒熱難消,故珠所除者形質、般若所除者三毒之心。毒與眼之對配:珠卻外來毒螫而不能除「四大毒蛇」(身內四大之患),般若則「畢竟除此二種毒」,且珠不能治邪見之毒而般若能除;珠治肉眼、近見眼,般若治慧眼、遠見眼,尤要者「珠能治肉眼,肉眼不作珠;般若能治慧眼,慧眼即作般若」——珠與所治者終是二物,般若與慧眼則治之即成,能所不隔。水色之對配:珠令水隨所裹之色、令濁水清,般若則能隨順心數善法、令六覺濁心與龍鬼人王之貪恚濁心清淨——珠所轉者外水,般若所轉者眾生心性。持久之對配尤關要害:珠但除所住處之闇熱、且「後病復發」,般若能滅劫盡大火、其治「畢竟清淨」——世間對治多是暫伏,般若之治乃是究竟。論主於此自設一問——四病既攝一切病,何以別說眼痛、癩病?答以「眼是身中第一,所用最貴」、「癩病最重,宿命罪因緣故難治」,故別說。末以函篋與舍利對顯,把喻收回本品題面:珠力入函篋而函篋不能與人隨意功德,舍利得般若薰修則供養者「必還得般若而得成佛」——般若是如意珠、函篋是舍利,舍利中雖無般若、卻因般若所薰而得供養;且函篋唯凡夫所貴,舍利則凡聖俱貴,其別正在有無般若之薰。最後論主自設收束之問:般若功德既如此,何以又說舍利是五波羅蜜乃至一切種智所住處故得供養?答得極精——「一切諸法,般若波羅蜜為首、為明導;譬如王來必有將從,但舉其主名,餘者已盡得」。舉般若之主名,則舍利所住之眾功德已盡攝其中,二者不相違。

不要讀錯

不要把『二分取般若』讀成貶低舍利。帝釋開口便說『我於佛舍利非不恭敬、非不尊重』,論主又代言「供養芥子許舍利,功德無量無邊」。取般若而不取舍利,不是說舍利不足貴,而是溯其所以貴——「舍利從般若波羅蜜中生」,取那能生之本而已。把它讀成『舍利不必供養』,恰違本品『舍利得供養皆般若力』之旨。

不要把『般若無相不可取』與「取般若」讀成矛盾。舍利弗以『無相不可取』設難,帝釋答以「不行二法」——所謂取,是不落取捨二邊而行於不二,不是取一個叫般若的東西。若把「取」讀成有能取所取,正是帝釋、佛所破的「二相」。

不要把摩尼寶、如意珠讀成般若真如珠。這是「以世間人貴是寶珠故,以珠為喻」的借喻,而且論主處處點出珠之不及:珠但除所住處熱、般若能滅劫盡大火,珠後病復發、般若畢竟清淨。喻是為顯般若遠勝於珠,不是說般若如珠一般是一物、有定相;讀成『般若是個能滿願的寶』,就把無相之般若坐實了。

不要把『八萬四千病、根本四病』與三藥的配對讀成醫方。論主把八萬四千煩惱收歸貪、瞋、癡、等分四病,再配以不淨觀、慈悲心、觀因緣三藥治之,這是一張修心的對治綱要,不是治身之藥方。四病是煩惱之類分、三藥是觀法之類分,重在令行者知煩惱雖多不出四類、對治雖廣不出三門,把它讀成珠能療身病一般的實效,就錯過了『般若治心』這一層。

不要把『珠出處四說』『己身二喻』讀成論主的定論或諍辯。這兩處都是論主並錄的異說(己身二喻,一為論主自釋、一出「有人言」),誌之不判。既不必在四說中強斷何者為真,也不可把並錄讀成論主自起爭端——它只是如實錄下舊說,重心仍在『般若為一切功德所從出』這一正義。

不要把「舍利是五波羅蜜乃至一切種智所住處」讀成與「取般若」相違。論主已用『舉主名而將從盡得』會通:般若為首為明導,舉般若則其所生、所住之眾功德(含舍利所住者)已盡攝。二說一是就能生說、一是就所住說,並行不悖,不是前後打架。

不要把「與佛等無異」讀成受持者已與佛齊。論主說得分明:這是『就法身而說』,是就所依之般若相同而說其福等,並非拿凡夫菩薩之功德去比佛的無量身。等的是所依之本、所發之大乘心,不是等其果位;把它讀成『持經即已成佛』,便失了『就法身說』這一分際。

不要把『舍利得供養皆般若力』讀成舍利本身無德。舍利是「先世業因緣所成」,本應償諸對報,正因般若薰修,宿業諸對及飢渴寒熱皆不能及,反得諸天世人供養——如負債人依王反為債主所敬。這是說舍利之德由般若而顯、而護,不是說舍利是空殼;貶舍利與神化舍利,都非論主之意。

修行作用

供養時守住『溯本』這把尺。禮舍利、禮塔、禮經卷,事相上一一恭敬(帝釋尚『不敢輕慢芥子許舍利』),心裡卻明白所敬之尊源在般若——『舍利從般若中生、般若薰修故得供養』。如此供養,既不失事相之福,又不滯於所生之相而忘其能生之本。這也提醒:修福不必與修慧打成兩橛,供養一卷般若、受持正憶念,其福已含攝一切種智所住之德,是即福即慧的下手處。

以『內外二護』安心。論主說般若功德「無諸衰病及怖畏」以明內、『人非人不得其便』以明外:內則身衰心病隨意能除,外則邪魔羅剎不得其便。用功時遇內擾(煩惱病苦)、遇外緣(違逆惱害),都可回到般若之照——不是求珠一般求一個護身之物,而是以無相之慧令內外諸擾無所著處,自然「不得其便」。

於「無相」處學不落二邊。日用中一遇『取捨』現前——取善捨惡、取淨捨垢、取般若捨舍利——就想起『般若不行二法故,不二法相是般若』:可以宛然行取捨之事,心不落取相捨相。這正是帝釋『取而無取』的落實。

以摩尼寶十九重之喻對治自心。珠除熱、除冷、除闇、卻毒、治眼、治癩,一一可轉觀己心之病:婬熱、瞋熱以慈悲不淨對治,無明之冷以般若之照對治,慧眼被邪見所破則以般若令其明了。用這串現成的配喻作日課的檢點表,比空說『以般若除煩惱』更有下手處。

記住般若「畢竟清淨」勝於珠之「後病復發」。世間種種對治多是壓伏,病緣一至又發;般若治慧眼是「畢竟清淨」「慧眼即作般若」。修行時若見煩惱暫伏又起,不必灰心,正好回到般若之照——求那能令病不復發的畢竟藥,而非只求一時之伏。

以『舉主名而將從盡得』安頓雜行。念佛、供養、持戒、布施種種善法看似分散,只要以般若為首為明導,如「王來必有將從」,一行般若則諸行盡攝。用心之要在『舉主』——把般若之無所得慧貫在一切善法之首,不必逐法零碎經營。

以『六度但一不二』收攝行門。布施時不見施者受者財物、持戒時不見持犯之相,種種度皆以不二之慧行之,即帝釋所謂「不二法相是禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜」。如此,一度之中已具般若、般若之外別無諸度,行者不必於六門各起一番取捨經營,唯守「不行二法」一味貫之。

於「見佛」處立究竟願。本單元把供養之校量,末後收在『欲見十方諸佛法身色身,當受持般若、以法相修念佛三昧』。念佛而以法相修,即是不取佛之色相而契佛之法身;供養般若之極致不在得福,而在能見諸佛。修行時把念佛與般若合修——念佛不離無相、觀空不廢念佛,正是本品『見佛與見般若等無異』之落實。

承衍

之上的骨架是一條『從所生溯能生』的線:經①以『二分取般若』立起舍利『從般若中生』,並藉舍利弗之難把「取般若」逼成「不行二法」的不二正義;經②以負債依王、摩尼寶兩喻把般若鋪成一切功德(舍利、諸佛相好、五度得名、一切種智)之所從出;論①②則層層釋難——以『以少勝多』解舍利對校之問,以「發菩薩心」解受持與佛等之問,以如意珠十九重配喻顯般若遠勝於它所出生之物,末以『舉主名而將從盡得』會通「取般若」與「舍利得供養」二說不相違。全單元的兩句引擎,一是帝釋的『舍利從般若薰修故得供養』,一是論主的『般若為首、為明導』:前一句管『能生』——舍利之貴溯到般若;後一句管『統攝』——舉般若則所生眾德盡在其中。之上把『舍利與般若』這對能所講到『舉主盡得』為止,也一路埋下了「攝」的伏線:般若不但生舍利、生諸佛諸德,更為一切法之首、之明導,舉般若則餘者盡得。這『攝一切法』之義在之上已呼之欲出,只待正面立說。留給之下的接口正順此而開:既然般若攝一切法,那麼『有為、無為』二法相又如何盡攝於般若、菩薩又如何以般若為明導而具足六度、書經自誦與施人校量又當如何權衡——這正是之下經③論③接著要問、要答的。之上以『舉主名而將從盡得』收,之下便以『有為無為二法相皆般若中攝』承,能生之義遂轉為能攝之義,一線相貫。合而觀之,之上所立的『舍利從般若生』與『般若與佛無二』兩柱,正是之下『般若攝一切法、為六度明導』的張本:先明般若為能生之本,再明般若為能攝之綱,本品一部校量之旨,於此上下兩單元首尾相接而後圓足。

Weighing the Relics, First Part: The Relics Are Born from Prajñā, and of the Two Portions Prajñā Is Taken; the Wish-Fulfilling Jewel as a Simile for the Merit of Prajñā

What Is Being Asked

The face of this unit's question is a ‘choice between two portions’: the Buddha sets on one side the Buddha's relics filling Jambudvīpa, and on the other side the written scroll of the prajñā sūtra, and asks Śakra which side he will take. Śakra does not take the relics but takes prajñā. At first glance this looks like slighting the relics, but in fact it is just the opposite—Śakra at once declares ‘it is not that I do not revere the Buddha's relics, not that I do not honour them’, and his reason for taking prajñā is only one sentence: the relics are noble because they are 「從般若波羅蜜中生、般若波羅蜜薰修故」 tr. "born from prajñāpāramitā and perfumed and cultivated by prajñāpāramitā". So the real question is not ‘which is nobler, the relics or prajñā’, but ‘where does the nobility of the relics have its source’. With this one question the object of offering is traced back from the fruit to the cause, from what is produced to what produces.

This question also answers to the two faces of this chapter's name—the title 「校量舍利」 tr. "weighing the relics" has on one face 「校量」 tr. "weighing" (weighing the ascending grades of the merit of offering), and on the other 「舍利」 tr. "relics" (the thing weighed). What the whole unit labours at is precisely to make clear, in the midst of the weighing, that the amount of merit is decided not by the size or number of what is offered, but by whether the root of what is offered is prajñā. Therefore, although ‘relics filling Jambudvīpa’ are set against ‘one scroll of the sūtra’, the quantities are vastly unequal and yet prajñā wins instead—this is the pivot of the word 「校量」 tr. "weighing" in this chapter.

Within the unit two reversals press the point of the question still harder. First, Śāriputra cuts in with a challenge: prajñā is ‘without form, without shape, without resistance, one mark, namely the signless’; since it is signless and cannot be taken, on what ground does Śakra 「取」 tr. "take" it? This challenge presses 「取般若」 tr. "taking prajñā" toward 「不二法相」 tr. "the mark of non-dual dharmas"—Śakra answers that prajñā 「不行二法」 tr. "does not practise dual dharmas"; taking without the mark of taking is what is called truly taking. Second, the treatise-author sets up several questions of his own: since the weighing has already been made with the stūpa of the seven jewels, why weigh again with relics? Since prajñā is said to be signless, how can offering to it be equal to offering to the Buddha? Since the merit of prajñā is said to be so great, why is it further said that 「舍利是五波羅蜜乃至一切種智所住處故得供養」 tr. "the relics receive offerings because they are the abiding-place of the five perfections and so on up to omniscience of all kinds"? These three questions peel back, layer by layer, the relation between ‘that which produces (prajñā)’ and ‘what is produced (the relics, the scroll, the merits of the buddhas)’. The backbone of the whole unit is the simile of a 「如意寶珠」 tr. "wish-fulfilling jewel", by which it is matched and explained point by point how prajñā is that from which all merits come forth, and how it far surpasses the relics it gives birth to.

Passage by Passage

First, look at the choice in Sūtra ① and Śakra's reason. The Buddha sets ‘relics filling Jambudvīpa’ against ‘the written scroll of the prajñā sūtra’ and has Śakra take one and leave the other; Śakra takes prajñā, and states his own causes and conditions: the relics receive offerings only because they are 「從般若波羅蜜中生、般若波羅蜜薰修故」 tr. "born from prajñāpāramitā and perfumed and cultivated by prajñāpāramitā". This sentence is the root of the whole chapter: the relics are precious, and their preciousness lies in their being the fruit born and perfumed by prajñā; taking the fruit is not as good as taking the cause, taking what is produced is not as good as taking what produces, so not taking the relics but taking prajñā is exactly taking their root source. When the measure reaches the three-thousand great-thousand world, Śakra still takes prajñā, and his reason goes a step further—「是般若波羅蜜中生諸佛舍利」 tr. "it is within this prajñāpāramitā that the relics of the buddhas are born", and so on to ‘whether one sees the present Buddha or sees the scroll of prajñāpāramitā, they are equal and without difference’, because 「般若波羅蜜與佛無二無別故」 tr. "prajñāpāramitā and the Buddha are without duality and without difference". From ‘the relics are born from prajñā’ to ‘prajñā and the Buddha are not two’, the meaning of that which produces is pushed all the way to its limit: prajñā not only gives birth to the relics but is also without difference from the Buddha's own body, so to see the scroll is like seeing the Buddha. Here the chapter's general proposition is first set up: prajñā is the producing root of the relics and of the Buddha, and the merit of making offerings to the relics in truth comes from prajñā.

Śāriputra's challenge and Śakra's answer are the first pass of Sūtra ①. Śāriputra says that prajñā is ‘without form, without shape, without resistance, one mark, namely the signless’, and that prajñā 「不為取故出,不為捨故出,不為增減、聚散、損益、垢淨故出」 tr. "does not come forth for the sake of taking, does not come forth for the sake of relinquishing, does not come forth for the sake of increase or decrease, gathering or scattering, loss or gain, defilement or purity"; it does not give the dharmas of the buddhas and does not relinquish the dharmas of ordinary people, and so on up to not giving omniscience of all kinds and not relinquishing the dharmas of ordinary people—since it is a dharma apart from all taking and relinquishing, increase and decrease, how can one 「欲取」 tr. "wish to take" it? This challenge is extremely sharp: since prajñā is absolute and signless, the moment a thought of 「取」 tr. "taking" arises one falls into the duality of the taker and the taken—does that not contradict its own signless nature? Śakra, following the point, answers with the most essential doctrinal sentence of the whole chapter: 「般若波羅蜜不行二法故,不二法相是般若波羅蜜,不二法相是禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜。」 tr. "Because prajñāpāramitā does not practise dual dharmas, the mark of non-dual dharmas is prajñāpāramitā, the mark of non-dual dharmas is dhyānapāramitā, and so on up to dānapāramitā." What he calls 「取」 tr. "taking" is not taking an object, but moving in non-duality; precisely because it does not fall into the two extremes of taking and relinquishing, it is truly able to practise and truly able to cultivate prajñā—the mark of non-dual dharmas is not only the mark of prajñā but also the mark of meditation and so on to giving and all the perfections, and the six perfections are threaded through by one single non-dual wisdom. The Buddha at once confirms this, and extends non-duality to the nature of dharmas, the limit of reality, and the nature of the inconceivable: whoever wishes to find 「法性二相」 tr. "two marks in the nature of dharmas" wishes to find ‘two marks in prajñā’, while 「法性、般若波羅蜜,無二無別」 tr. "the nature of dharmas and prajñāpāramitā are without duality and without difference"; so too with wishing to find 「實際、不可思議性二相」 tr. "two marks in the limit of reality and in the nature of the inconceivable". This brings the two statements that on the surface contradict each other—‘signless and cannot be taken’ and 「取般若」 tr. "taking prajñā"—to reconciliation in 「不二」 tr. "non-duality": signlessness is not an empty nothing with nothing to take, it is taking without setting up the mark of taking; taking prajñā is not attaining something else, it is entering into accord with the non-duality of the nature of dharmas.

Next Śakra sets out at length the merit of prajñā, in a string of similes. The simile of the seat in the Hall of Good Dharma says: when Śakra is not in his seat, the gods still pay homage to his seat, just as in the place where the scroll of prajñā abides the gods, nāgas, and the rest of the eight classes of the ten directions all come to worship and make offerings—because 「是般若波羅蜜中生諸佛及一切眾生樂具」 tr. "it is within this prajñāpāramitā that the buddhas and all the means of happiness of beings are born". What matters in this simile is not that gods and spirits come to worship, but that 「所住處」 tr. "the place where it abides" thereby becomes a holy place: the seat is revered not for the seat itself but for the one who taught the Dharma upon it; the scroll is revered not for its paper and ink but for the prajñā it expresses. The meaning of signlessness and fearlessness is this: one who receives and upholds prajñā and whose mind enters deeply into the Dharma 「不見怖畏相」 tr. "does not see any mark to be feared", because prajñā is 「無相無貌、無言無說」 tr. "without mark and without appearance, without words and without speech"; and it turns one layer further—precisely because prajñā truly is signless and without speech, the buddhas are able to 「知一切諸法無相無貌、無言無說」 tr. "know that all dharmas are without mark and without appearance, without words and without speech", and so attain right awakening and teach the Dharma to their disciples. This sentence turns 「無相」 tr. "signless" from the negative 「不可取」 tr. "cannot be taken" into the positive ‘that by which one becomes a Buddha’: it is not that prajñā, being signless, is not worth taking; on the contrary, it is by realising this signlessness that the buddhas become buddhas and teach the Dharma. Then the benefits of receiving and upholding prajñā are told: those who draw near to it, read, recite, write it out, rightly recollect it, and make offerings to it do not fall into the hells, the animals, or the hungry ghosts, and do not fall to the ground of the śrāvaka and the pratyekabuddha, and so on up to attaining unsurpassed awakening and always seeing the buddhas, going from one buddha-world to another buddha-world making offerings to the buddhas—the utmost of merit hangs entirely on one scroll of the signless sūtra.

Treatise ① first resolves the question of ‘the few surpassing the many’: the stūpa of the seven jewels was originally the dwelling-place of relics, and now the relics alone are set against the scroll because 「舍利雖不及般若,而滿閻浮提;般若妙故,但明經卷」 tr. "although the relics do not reach prajñā, they fill Jambudvīpa; because prajñā is wondrous, only the scroll is made clear"—since relics filling all of Jambudvīpa still cannot match one scroll of prajñā, the wonder of prajñā is seen all the more. It further explains why the Buddha asks Śakra: those who have left home mostly crave wisdom (the cause of liberation), while householders mostly crave merit (the cause of happiness); those who have left home mostly crave things known by mind-consciousness, while householders mostly crave things known by the five consciousnesses; Śakra 「已證福樂果報最大,於在家人中最為尊勝」 tr. "has already realised the greatest result of merit and happiness, and among householders is the most honoured and supreme", so the Buddha asks him in particular, letting this most honoured one in merit state for himself which to take and which to leave, so that his words carry the more weight. Śakra's statement of his own causes and conditions also has its measure: he 「不敢輕慢、不恭敬舍利」 tr. "does not dare to slight the relics or to be irreverent to them", and knows clearly that the merit of offering to relics the size of a mustard seed is already immeasurable and boundless, yet 「菩薩受身便有舍利,人所不貴;得成佛時,舍利以般若熏修故,人所恭敬」 tr. "when a bodhisattva takes on a body there are relics, but people do not value them; when he attains buddhahood, because the relics are perfumed and cultivated by prajñā, people revere them"—the relics are the same, and what separates their lowliness before buddhahood from their nobility after it is exactly whether or not they have been perfumed by prajñā; so he takes the superior one, that which perfumes. The treatise-author also settles the nature of Śāriputra's 「難」 tr. "challenge": that Śakra, living as a householder and covered over by the afflictions and the five desires, is able to speak on prajñā is a 「希有」 tr. "rare" thing; Śāriputra's questioning is 「欲令釋提桓因更問佛深義」 tr. "meant to lead Śakra Devānām Indra to ask the Buddha further about the deep meaning", not a real doubt. Śakra's answering 「如是」 tr. "just so" means ‘among all dharmas there is no mark of duality: the relics are not taken as small, nor prajñā as great’; that he speaks, in terms of worldly truth, of prajñā as 「能令眾生心無二無分別」 tr. "able to make the minds of beings without duality and without discrimination" is 「為利益新發意菩薩」 tr. "for the benefit of bodhisattvas who have newly aroused the mind"—one can see that Śakra all along speaks by way of the skilful means of worldly truth, while his bones are still non-duality. As for 「己身為喻」 tr. "taking himself as the simile", the treatise-author keeps two readings side by side: one reading has his own person stand for the Buddha and the scroll for the seat; the other has his own person stand for prajñā and the seat for the relics—the former is the treatise-author's own gloss, the latter is introduced by 「有人言」 tr. "some say", and the treatise-author records both without judgement. At the end the treatise-author points out that the Buddha 「開其初,以舍利滿閻浮提」 tr. "opened the beginning with relics filling Jambudvīpa"; once Śakra had grasped which wins and which loses, he, for the sake of all beings, extended it to the three-thousand great-thousand world, and his own statement of causes and conditions is precisely 「見般若波羅蜜,與見佛無異」 tr. "seeing prajñāpāramitā is no different from seeing the Buddha"—from the measure of Jambudvīpa pushed on to the measure of the great-thousand world, his resolve to take prajñā never shifts.

Sūtra ② carries on and spreads the merit out more widely, bringing in the two great similes of the debtor relying on the king and of the maṇi jewel. The three kinds of manifestation and the twelve divisions of the scriptures are all born from prajñā; and not only in this land—the buddhas of the ten directions, abiding in the three kinds of manifestation and teaching the twelve divisions of the scriptures, are likewise such that 「般若波羅蜜中生諸佛,亦生十二部經」 tr. "prajñāpāramitā gives birth to the buddhas, and also gives birth to the twelve divisions of the scriptures"; so one who receives and upholds prajñā and expounds it for others is 「等無異」 tr. "equal and without difference" from the Buddha. Making offerings to buddhas of the ten directions as many as the sands of the Ganges and writing out the scroll of prajñā—「其福正等」 tr. "their merit is exactly equal", because 「十方諸佛皆從般若波羅蜜中生」 tr. "the buddhas of the ten directions are all born from prajñāpāramitā"—this is the one meaning the whole chapter returns to again and again: the measure of merit is decided by the root it relies on, and when the root is the same, the merit is equal. It is further said that one who hears prajñā, receives and upholds it, and rightly recollects it 「正住阿鞞跋致地中」 tr. "abides rightly in the ground of avaivartika", far from all suffering, vexation, decline, and sickness—the benefit of receiving and upholding is not only escaping a fall into the evil destinies, but rightly entering the non-retrogressing position. The simile of the debtor relying on the king shows the meaning of ‘that which produces’ most clearly: the relics are like the debtor, prajñā is like the king; 「負債人依王故得供養,舍利亦依般若波羅蜜修薰故得供養」 tr. "the debtor receives offerings because he relies on the king; the relics too receive offerings because they rely on being cultivated and perfumed by prajñāpāramitā"; the omniscience of all kinds of the buddhas too is accomplished by the cultivating and perfuming of prajñā. So within prajñā are born 「生諸佛舍利、三十二相」 tr. "the relics of the buddhas and the thirty-two marks", born are 「十力、四無所畏、四無礙智、十八不共法、大慈大悲」 tr. "the ten powers, the four fearlessnesses, the four unobstructed knowledges, the eighteen unshared dharmas, great kindness and great compassion", born is the name of the five perfections, born is the omniscience of all kinds of the buddhas—this long list of merits is not display, but counts ‘prajñā as that which produces’ all the way to the virtues of the Buddha-ground, letting one see how wide is what prajñā brings forth. The simile of the maṇi jewel then formally takes the stage: in the place where the jewel abides non-humans find no opening; it can remove the sicknesses of heat, cold, wind, and their mixture, remove the stings of poisonous snakes, light up dark places, and make turbid water clear, taking on the colour it is wrapped in—Ānanda asks one question here (Ānanda's only appearance in this chapter), and Śakra answers that this is a heavenly jewel; Jambudvīpa also has it, but 「功德相少不具足」 tr. "its marks of merit are few and incomplete", which sets off the heavenly jewel as pure, light, and wondrous beyond comparison, a simile for the merit of prajñā, which no worldly dharma can match. Śakra further declares that the relics' receiving offerings is 「皆般若波羅蜜力」 tr. "entirely the power of prajñāpāramitā", and enumerates that the relics are 「諸功德寶波羅蜜住處」 tr. "the abiding-place of the pāramitā of the jewels of all merits", 「不垢不淨波羅蜜住處」 tr. "the abiding-place of the pāramitā that is neither stained nor pure", and so on to 「諸法相波羅蜜住處」 tr. "the abiding-place of the pāramitā of the marks of all dharmas"; because they are perfumed and cultivated by the pāramitā of the marks of all dharmas, they receive offerings; and so on to this, that one who receives and upholds prajñā can fulfil the six perfections, the four foundations of mindfulness, and so on up to the eighteen unshared dharmas, passes beyond the grounds of the two vehicles, abides in the bodhisattva position, attains the supernormal powers of a bodhisattva, and takes on bodies for the sake of beings so as to bring beings to maturity. At the end it is further said that one who wishes to see the Dharma body and the form body of the buddhas of the ten directions should receive and uphold prajñā and cultivate the samādhi of recollecting the Buddha by way of the mark of dharmas—gathering the weighing of offerings back into the ultimate benefit of 「見佛」 tr. "seeing the Buddha".

Treatise ② is the densest place in the doctrine of this unit, matching and explaining the merits of prajñā one by one around the 「如意寶珠」 tr. "wish-fulfilling jewel". It first resolves ‘how can merely receiving and upholding prajñā be equal to the Buddha’: the Buddha wishes to praise prajñā as great—「於十二部經中,般若為最勝」 tr. "among the twelve divisions of the scriptures, prajñā is the most supreme"—because teaching prajñā mostly arouses the bodhisattva mind, while teaching the twelve divisions of the scriptures arouses intents of the three vehicles mixed together; this is said with reference to the Dharma body, and so it is equal and without difference. Next it explains where the maṇi jewel comes from, and the treatise-author sets four accounts side by side (it comes out of a nāga king's brain / it is a fragment broken off Śakra's vajra / it is transformed from the relics of past buddhas / it exists naturally from the merit of beings); these too are divergent accounts of the ancient masters, recorded and not judged. The treatise-author also first gathers it up in one sentence: the reason the merit of prajñā is superior lies in its 「能破一切苦惱、衰病、怖畏」 tr. "being able to break all suffering, vexation, decline, sickness, and fear"; and it is divided into the two gates of inner and outer—「無諸衰病及怖畏」 tr. "free of all decline, sickness, and fear" makes the inner clear, ‘with the maṇi jewel, neither humans nor non-humans find an opening’ makes the outer clear; inner and outer show each other, and one sees how complete is the protecting care of prajñā.

Then comes the most finely woven ‘jewel–prajñā’ matching of the whole chapter, which can be read as a table of contrasts that uses the jewel to set off prajñā, while at every point showing what the jewel falls short of. The matching of sicknesses: the jewel removes the four hundred and four sicknesses and the four root sicknesses (wind, heat, cold, and their mixture); prajñā removes the eighty-four thousand sicknesses and the four root sicknesses (greed, hatred, delusion, and their equal mixture), and the medicines that counteract them are set out in detail—the contemplation of impurity removes greed, the mind of kindness and compassion removes anger, the contemplation of causes and conditions removes delusion, and the three medicines together cure the sickness of equal mixture; this is the practical outline that gathers the eighty-four thousand afflictions back into the three poisons, and the three poisons back into the three contemplations. The matching of removing darkness, removing heat, and removing cold: the jewel removes darkness, prajñā removes the darkness of the three realms; the jewel removes heat, prajñā removes the heat of lust and anger; the jewel removes cold, prajñā removes the cold mind of ignorance, lack of faith, and indolence—the cold and heat of outer things are easily removed, the cold and heat of the mind's nature are hard to dispel, so what the jewel removes is shape and substance, what prajñā removes is the mind of the three poisons. The matching of poison and of the eye: the jewel wards off poisonous stings that come from outside but cannot remove 「四大毒蛇」 tr. "the four great poisonous snakes" (the ills of the four great elements within the body), while prajñā 「畢竟除此二種毒」 tr. "ultimately removes both these kinds of poison"; moreover the jewel cannot cure the poison of wrong view, while prajñā can remove it; the jewel cures the fleshly eye, the eye that sees near, while prajñā cures the wisdom-eye, the eye that sees far; most important of all, 「珠能治肉眼,肉眼不作珠;般若能治慧眼,慧眼即作般若」 tr. "the jewel can cure the fleshly eye, yet the fleshly eye does not become the jewel; prajñā can cure the wisdom-eye, and the wisdom-eye at once becomes prajñā"—the jewel and what it cures remain two things in the end, whereas prajñā and the wisdom-eye become one in the very curing, the curer and the cured not separated. The matching of water and colour: the jewel makes water take on the colour it is wrapped in and makes turbid water clear, while prajñā can accord with wholesome mental-factor dharmas and make pure the turbid mind of the six thoughts, and the turbid minds of greed and anger of the kings of nāgas, of ghosts and spirits, and of humans—what the jewel turns is outer water, what prajñā turns is the nature of beings' minds. The matching of endurance goes most to the vital point: the jewel only removes the darkness and heat of the place where it abides, and 「後病復發」 tr. "afterwards the sickness breaks out again", while prajñā can extinguish the great fire at the end of the kalpa, and its cure is 「畢竟清淨」 tr. "ultimately pure"—the counteractions of the world are mostly temporary suppressions, while the cure of prajñā is final. Here the treatise-author raises a question of his own—since the four sicknesses include all sicknesses, why are eye pain and leprosy spoken of separately? He answers that 「眼是身中第一,所用最貴」 tr. "the eye is foremost in the body, and most precious in use", and that 「癩病最重,宿命罪因緣故難治」 tr. "leprosy is the heaviest, and is hard to cure because of the causes and conditions of sin in past lives", and so they are spoken of separately. At the end the casket and the relics are set against each other, bringing the simile back to the face of this chapter's title: the jewel's power enters the casket, yet the casket cannot give people the merit of having their wishes fulfilled, whereas the relics, having received the perfuming and cultivating of prajñā, are such that those who make offerings to them 「必還得般若而得成佛」 tr. "will surely in turn attain prajñā and become buddhas"—prajñā is the wish-fulfilling jewel and the casket is the relics; although there is no prajñā within the relics, they receive offerings because they have been perfumed by prajñā; moreover the casket is valued only by ordinary people, while the relics are valued by ordinary people and noble ones alike, and the difference lies exactly in whether or not there is the perfuming of prajñā. Finally the treatise-author raises a question himself to close: since the merit of prajñā is such as this, why is it also said that the relics receive offerings because they are the abiding-place of the five perfections and so on up to omniscience of all kinds? The answer is extremely fine—「一切諸法,般若波羅蜜為首、為明導;譬如王來必有將從,但舉其主名,餘者已盡得」 tr. "among all dharmas, prajñāpāramitā is the head and the bright guide; just as when a king comes there is surely a retinue following, and naming only the lord, the rest are already all included". Name the lord, prajñā, and the many merits that abide in the relics are already all gathered within it; the two statements do not contradict each other.

Do Not Misread

Do not read ‘of the two portions, prajñā is taken’ as belittling the relics. At his very first words Śakra says ‘it is not that I do not revere the Buddha's relics, not that I do not honour them’, and the treatise-author also says on his behalf 「供養芥子許舍利,功德無量無邊」 tr. "making offerings to relics the size of a mustard seed, the merit is immeasurable and boundless". Taking prajñā rather than the relics does not say that the relics are not worth valuing; it traces back why they are valued—「舍利從般若波羅蜜中生」 tr. "the relics are born from prajñāpāramitā"—and takes only that producing root. To read it as ‘the relics need not be offered to’ runs exactly against this chapter's point that ‘the relics' receiving offerings is entirely the power of prajñā’.

Do not read ‘prajñā is signless and cannot be taken’ and 「取般若」 tr. "taking prajñā" as a contradiction. Śāriputra raises his challenge with ‘signless and cannot be taken’, and Śakra answers with 「不行二法」 tr. "does not practise dual dharmas"—what is called taking is moving in non-duality without falling into the two extremes of taking and relinquishing; it is not taking a thing called prajñā. If 「取」 tr. "taking" is read as having a taker and a taken, that is precisely the 「二相」 tr. "two marks" that Śakra and the Buddha refute.

Do not read the maṇi jewel, the wish-fulfilling jewel, as prajñā truly being a jewel. This is a borrowed simile, 「以世間人貴是寶珠故,以珠為喻」 tr. "because people of the world value this precious jewel, the jewel is used as a simile", and the treatise-author points out at every turn where the jewel falls short: the jewel removes only the heat of the place where it abides, prajñā can extinguish the great fire at the end of the kalpa; with the jewel the sickness breaks out again afterwards, prajñā is ultimately pure. The simile is there to show that prajñā far surpasses the jewel, not to say that prajñā, like the jewel, is a thing with a fixed mark; to read it as ‘prajñā is a treasure that can fulfil wishes’ is to make the signless prajñā into something solid.

Do not read the pairing of ‘the eighty-four thousand sicknesses and the four root sicknesses’ with the three medicines as a medical prescription. The treatise-author gathers the eighty-four thousand afflictions back into the four sicknesses of greed, hatred, delusion, and equal mixture, and then pairs them with the three medicines of the contemplation of impurity, the mind of kindness and compassion, and the contemplation of causes and conditions to cure them; this is an outline of counteraction for cultivating the mind, not a prescription for curing the body. The four sicknesses are a classification of the afflictions, the three medicines a classification of contemplations; the weight lies in letting the practitioner know that though the afflictions are many they do not go beyond four kinds, and though the counteractions are wide they do not go beyond three gates. To read it as having a real effect like the jewel's healing of bodily sickness is to miss the layer of ‘prajñā cures the mind’.

Do not read ‘the four accounts of the jewel's origin’ and ‘the two similes of his own person’ as the treatise-author's settled conclusions or as disputation. Both places are divergent accounts the treatise-author himself sets side by side (of the two similes of one's own body, one is his own gloss and the other a 「有人言」 tr. "some say"), recorded without judgement. There is no need to force a decision about which of the four accounts is true, nor may the recording side by side be read as the treatise-author starting a controversy of his own—it simply records the old accounts as they are, and the weight still lies on the right meaning that ‘prajñā is that from which all merits come forth’.

Do not read 「舍利是五波羅蜜乃至一切種智所住處」 tr. "the relics are the abiding-place of the five perfections and so on up to omniscience of all kinds" as contradicting 「取般若」 tr. "taking prajñā". The treatise-author has already reconciled them with ‘name the lord and the retinue is all included’: prajñā is the head and the bright guide, and naming prajñā already gathers in all the many merits it produces and that abide (including those abiding in the relics). Of the two statements, one speaks of what produces and one of what abides; they run side by side without conflict, not fighting each other front and back.

Do not read 「與佛等無異」 tr. "equal to the Buddha and without difference" as meaning that the one who upholds it is already level with the Buddha. The treatise-author says it plainly: this is ‘said with reference to the Dharma body’; it says their merit is equal in that the prajñā relied on is the same, not that the merit of an ordinary bodhisattva is being set against the Buddha's immeasurable body. What is equal is the root relied on and the Great Vehicle mind aroused, not the fruit-position; to read it as ‘upholding the sūtra is already becoming a Buddha’ is to lose the boundary of ‘said with reference to the Dharma body’.

Do not read ‘the relics' receiving offerings is entirely the power of prajñā’ as meaning that the relics themselves have no virtue. The relics are 「先世業因緣所成」 tr. "formed by the causes and conditions of karma in former lives", and ought to repay all their opposing retributions; precisely because of the perfuming and cultivating of prajñā, the opposing retributions of past karma and hunger, thirst, cold, and heat cannot reach them, and instead they receive offerings from the gods and the people of the world—like the debtor who, relying on the king, is instead revered by his creditors. This says that the virtue of the relics is shown and protected by prajñā, not that the relics are an empty shell; belittling the relics and deifying the relics are both not the treatise-author's meaning.

Bearing on Practice

When making offerings, hold to the measuring-rule of ‘tracing back to the root’. In worshipping relics, worshipping stūpas, and worshipping the scroll of the sūtra, be reverent in each outward act (even Śakra ‘does not dare to slight relics the size of a mustard seed’), while knowing clearly in the mind that the honoured source of what is revered lies in prajñā—‘the relics are born from prajñā, and receive offerings because they are perfumed and cultivated by prajñā’. Offering in this way, one neither loses the merit of the outward act nor gets stuck in the mark of what is produced and forgets its producing root. This is also a reminder: cultivating merit and cultivating wisdom need not be split into two separate halves; offering to one scroll of prajñā, receiving and upholding it and rightly recollecting it, the merit already contains the virtues abiding in omniscience of all kinds—this is where to set one's hand to merit that is at once wisdom.

Settle the mind with the ‘two protections, inner and outer’. The treatise-author says the merit of prajñā makes the inner clear with 「無諸衰病及怖畏」 tr. "free of all decline, sickness, and fear", and makes the outer clear with ‘neither humans nor non-humans find an opening’: inwardly, bodily decline and sickness of mind can be removed at will; outwardly, evil Māras and rākṣasas 「不得其便」 tr. "find no opening". When in one's practice one meets inner disturbance (the sickness and suffering of the afflictions) or outer conditions (opposition, vexation, and harm), one can return to the illumination of prajñā—not seeking something to protect the body the way one seeks a jewel, but, by the signless wisdom, leaving the inner and outer disturbances nowhere to attach themselves, so that naturally they ‘find no opening’.

Learn, in the place of 「無相」 tr. "the signless", not to fall into the two extremes. In daily life, as soon as ‘taking and relinquishing’ appears before one—taking good and relinquishing evil, taking the pure and relinquishing the defiled, taking prajñā and relinquishing the relics—recall ‘because prajñā does not practise dual dharmas, the mark of non-dual dharmas is prajñā’: one may plainly carry out the acts of taking and relinquishing, while the mind does not fall into the mark of taking or the mark of relinquishing. This is exactly the making real of Śakra's ‘taking without taking’.

Use the nineteenfold simile of the maṇi jewel to counteract one's own mind. The jewel removes heat, removes cold, removes darkness, wards off poison, cures the eye, cures leprosy—each of these can be turned into a contemplation of the sicknesses of one's own mind: the heat of lust and the heat of anger are counteracted by kindness and compassion and by the contemplation of impurity; the cold of ignorance is counteracted by the illumination of prajñā; when the wisdom-eye is broken by wrong view, prajñā makes it clear again. Using this ready-made string of paired similes as a checklist for daily practice gives more of a place to set one's hand than merely saying ‘remove the afflictions with prajñā’.

Remember that prajñā's 「畢竟清淨」 tr. "ultimately pure" surpasses the jewel's 「後病復發」 tr. "afterwards the sickness breaks out again". The many counteractions of the world are mostly suppressions, and as soon as the conditions of sickness arrive it breaks out again; prajñā's cure of the wisdom-eye is 「畢竟清淨」 tr. "ultimately pure", and 「慧眼即作般若」 tr. "the wisdom-eye at once becomes prajñā". In practice, if one sees the afflictions suppressed for a while and then arising again, there is no need to lose heart; that is just the time to return to the illumination of prajñā—to seek the final medicine that can keep the sickness from breaking out again, not merely a suppression for a time.

Settle the many practices with ‘name the lord and the retinue is all included’. Recollecting the Buddha, making offerings, keeping the precepts, giving—the many wholesome dharmas seem scattered, but as long as prajñā is made the head and the bright guide, then as 「王來必有將從」 tr. "when a king comes there is surely a retinue following", practising prajñā once gathers in all the practices. The key to applying the mind lies in ‘naming the lord’—threading the wisdom of prajñā, which has nothing to be attained, at the head of all wholesome dharmas, without having to manage each dharma piecemeal.

Gather the gates of practice with ‘the six perfections are threaded by one single non-duality’. In giving, not seeing a giver, a receiver, or the thing given; in keeping the precepts, not seeing the mark of keeping or breaking; each of the perfections is practised with the wisdom of non-duality, which is what Śakra calls 「不二法相是禪波羅蜜乃至檀波羅蜜」 tr. "the mark of non-dual dharmas is dhyānapāramitā, and so on up to dānapāramitā". In this way, within one perfection prajñā is already complete, and outside prajñā there are no separate perfections; the practitioner need not raise a separate round of taking, relinquishing, and managing at each of the six gates, but only keeps to 「不行二法」 tr. "does not practise dual dharmas" and threads everything through with one taste.

Set up the ultimate vow at the place of 「見佛」 tr. "seeing the Buddha". This unit finally gathers the weighing of offerings into ‘one who wishes to see the Dharma body and the form body of the buddhas of the ten directions should receive and uphold prajñā and cultivate the samādhi of recollecting the Buddha by way of the mark of dharmas’. To recollect the Buddha while cultivating by way of the mark of dharmas is not to grasp the Buddha's form-marks but to accord with the Buddha's Dharma body; the utmost of offering to prajñā lies not in gaining merit but in being able to see the buddhas. In practice, cultivate recollection of the Buddha and prajñā together—recollecting the Buddha without leaving the signless, contemplating emptiness without abandoning recollection of the Buddha—this is exactly the making real of this chapter's ‘seeing the Buddha and seeing prajñā are equal and without difference’.

Further Resonances

The skeleton of the First Part is one line ‘tracing back from what is produced to what produces’: Sūtra ① with ‘of the two portions, prajñā is taken’ sets up that the relics are ‘born from prajñā’, and by way of Śāriputra's challenge presses 「取般若」 tr. "taking prajñā" into the right meaning of non-duality, 「不行二法」 tr. "does not practise dual dharmas"; Sūtra ②, with the two similes of the debtor relying on the king and of the maṇi jewel, spreads prajñā out as that from which all merits (the relics, the marks and excellent signs of the buddhas, the naming of the five perfections, omniscience of all kinds) come forth; Treatises ① and ② resolve the difficulties layer by layer—resolving the question of weighing against the relics with ‘the few surpassing the many’, resolving the question of upholding being equal to the Buddha with 「發菩薩心」 tr. "arousing the bodhisattva mind", showing with the nineteenfold matching of the wish-fulfilling jewel how prajñā far surpasses what it gives birth to, and at the end reconciling, with ‘name the lord and the retinue is all included’, the two statements of 「取般若」 tr. "taking prajñā" and 「舍利得供養」 tr. "the relics receive offerings" as not contradicting each other. The two engine-sentences of the whole unit are, first, Śakra's ‘the relics receive offerings because they are perfumed and cultivated by prajñā’, and second, the treatise-author's ‘prajñā is the head and the bright guide’: the first governs ‘what produces’—the nobility of the relics is traced back to prajñā; the second governs ‘gathering in’—name prajñā and the many virtues it produces are all within it. The First Part carries the pair ‘relics and prajñā’, the produced and the producer, as far as ‘name the lord and all is included’, and all along lays the hidden thread of 「攝」 tr. "gathering in": prajñā not only gives birth to the relics and to the buddhas and their virtues, but is also the head and the bright guide of all dharmas, and naming prajñā includes all the rest. This meaning of ‘gathering in all dharmas’ is already on the verge of being spoken in the First Part, waiting only to be set out directly. The joint left for the Last Part opens right along this line: since prajñā gathers in all dharmas, how then are the two marks of dharmas, ‘conditioned and unconditioned’, entirely gathered into prajñā; how does the bodhisattva take prajñā as the bright guide and fulfil the six perfections; and how should writing out the sūtra and reciting it oneself be weighed against giving it to others—this is exactly what Sūtra ③ and Treatise ③ of the Last Part go on to ask and to answer. The First Part closes with ‘name the lord and the retinue is all included’, and the Last Part takes it up with ‘the two marks of dharmas, conditioned and unconditioned, are both gathered within prajñā’; the meaning of producing thus turns into the meaning of gathering in, threaded through by one line. Seen together, the two pillars set up in the First Part, ‘the relics are born from prajñā’ and ‘prajñā and the Buddha are not two’, are exactly the groundwork for the Last Part's ‘prajñā gathers in all dharmas and is the bright guide of the six perfections’: first it is made clear that prajñā is the producing root, then that prajñā is the gathering cord, and the whole purport of weighing in this chapter, with these two units, upper and lower, joined head to tail, is thereafter complete.

Translator · 釋慧鏡 Shi Huijing. The full statement of AI's role across the 指月 project is maintained at methodology.

License · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0